reSee.it - Related Post Feed

Anc_Aesthetics
Posted - September 13, 2025 at 9:49 PM
Saved - September 14, 2025 at 7:32 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I am now convinced that Charlie’s assassination was executed by a radical left-wing transgender group. Evidence includes Tyler's relationship with a transgender man, bullets from his rifle with engravings linked to transgender ideology, and a transgender account celebrating Charlie's death shortly after it happened. Additionally, other accounts hinted at violence during Charlie's event, and Tyler was active in transgender discords, suggesting planning. He also received the rifle from someone, pointing to a coordinated effort. More updates will follow.

@Anc_Aesthetics - Aesthetica

I am now 100% confident that Charlie’s assassination was carried out by a radical left wing transgender terror cell. Let’s get into the evidence 1) Tyler was dating a living with a transgender man (male to female) https://t.co/Fxow6ifZxl

@Anc_Aesthetics - Aesthetica

2) Two of the bullets found in Tyler’s rifle had engravings consistent with radical far left transgender ideology “Notices bulge OwO” is a reference to “chasers” gay men who like trans women. Noticing the trans man’s “bulge” “catch fascist” is self explanatory https://t.co/XBjpSrKfER

@Anc_Aesthetics - Aesthetica

3) Tyler’s transgender boyfriend is friends with a transgender account on tik tok and X that goes by the name “churbum75m (saw Tyler June 30th)” Minutes after Charlie was confirmed dead this transgender posted “WE FUCKING DID IT” https://t.co/CwdLuRXeWt

@Anc_Aesthetics - Aesthetica

4) But this wasn’t the only transgender account that had prior knowledge of the assassination. At least two other transgender people had posted in advance that something would happen to Charlie during his speaking event at UVU. https://t.co/HIwsh6c3AR

@Anc_Aesthetics - Aesthetica

5) We know that Tyler was very active on transgender discords. A hotbed for radicalization and far left extremism. Was this discord server used to plan the attack?

@Anc_Aesthetics - Aesthetica

6) We know that Tyler was “given” the rifle and did not purchase it himself. Who gave it to him? This was obviously a combined effort involving multiple people so one can only assume he got help from his transgender associates.

@Anc_Aesthetics - Aesthetica

That’s it for now, I will update this thread as more information becomes available.

@Anc_Aesthetics - Aesthetica

Another transgender account has been found to have had prior knowledge of the assassination. That’s now 6 far left trans terrorists who had advanced knowledge. https://t.co/X9c3ylGkvK

@Anc_Aesthetics - Aesthetica

We also know that Tyler Robinson had a furry account. Which is another obvious connection to far left trans ideology.

@Anc_Aesthetics - Aesthetica

Community Notes have gotten so pathetic. How is someone this retarded allowed to add a community note? https://t.co/zWTnqx1Qp5

VoxExVeritas
Posted - September 14, 2025 at 1:50 AM
Saved - September 14, 2025 at 9:47 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
This episode is being removed from the internet. I suspect Charlie Kirk was considering a presidential run, but his loyalty to Israel seems questionable. His security team, led by a former FBI agent, has faced criticism for their lack of preparedness during a recent shooting incident. There are claims that the team distanced themselves from Kirk, but evidence supporting this is weak. Discussions about downloading and sharing content related to these events are ongoing, with various users exchanging information and resources.

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

This episode is being scrubbed form the internet. The Charlie Kirk Show November 16, 2023 Please Spread/Download/Post🧵(UPDATING)

Video Transcript AI Summary
At a Reno event, the host hailed the 'win for liberty' from 'liberation of Twitter' and Elon Musk as hero for free speech. The discussion centers on Musk's response to a tweet about an anti‑Semitic ad; his reply to commenter amid backlash. The ad shows a white father challenging his son about posting anti-Semitic content, with 'You want truth said to your face? There it is.' The artist formerly known as Eric tweets, 'Jewish communities have been pushing the exact kind of hatred against whites that they claim to want people to stop using against them,' and Elon says, 'you have said the actual truth.' The host cites 'the Anti Defamation League was part and parcel with Black Lives Matter' and 'the philosophical foundation of anti whiteness has been largely financed by Jewish donors in the country.' He concludes that labeling Musk anti‑Semite is 'sloppy... shallow... wrong and repulsive.'
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hello, everybody. Radio stations across the country. Honored to be with you. You can email us as alwaysfreedom@CharlieKirk.com and subscribe to our podcast. Excellent event last evening in Reno, Nevada. It's great to see so many of you. I cannot emphasize enough. The win for liberty, the win for humanity that the liberation of Twitter has meant for all of us. It's remarkable. Liberating Twitter from what it once us was to what it is now is a win for the narrative. It's a win for truth. It's a win as we try to fight back against this uniparty regime, the tyrants, and the authoritarian dictators that are running the country. Elon Musk, even if they shut down Twitter today, will go down as a major hero for allowing us to be able to speak, to question narratives, to get the truth out. Elon Musk got himself in a little bit of trouble yesterday. Elon Musk responded to a tweet that I actually don't think the tweet is that smart. I think one part of it is legit. But I think another part of it is not so great. But the essence of what Elon was responding to is a major thought crime in America. That the world's wealthiest man would comment on this is historic. So here's the tweet, and it's responding to a video. And the video was basically, a white father with his white son saying to his son, hey, you think that, you know, you're posting online all this anti Semitic stuff. Why don't you go and say this to these Jewish families face? Pretty powerful advertisement. This is the ad. Okay? It's about a minute long. It's a powerful ad. And then a person on Twitter responded to this advertisement, and then Elon responded to the person responding to the advertisement. It's important. Bear with us. Because right now, Elon Musk is being targeted like never before. Elon Musk was supposed to speak at a summit today, and he's been canceled. They don't wanna hear from Elon Musk because they are tarring and feathering him as an anti Semite. They've come after this program for calling us anti Semites. They're coming after Elon Musk for calling, they're calling him an anti Semite. So here's the advertisement. It's a powerful ad. Play cut 79. Speaker 1: I saw what you've been posting. Hitler was right. I didn't teach you that. You hide behind your screen, spewing all this hatred and ugliness. You got something they wanna say? Get out of the truck and say it to their faces. Speaker 0: Okay. So that that advertisement then was responded to by this person, the artist formerly known as Eric. Quote, okay. Jewish communities have been pushing the exact kind of dialectical hatred against whites that they claim to want people to stop using against them. I am deeply disinterested in giving the tiniest swear word, let's just say tiniest crap, now about Western Jewish populations coming to the disturbing realization that those hordes of minorities that support flooding their country don't exactly like them too much. You want truth said to your face? There it is. Now let me just say, this is not is not a very well written tweet. I said it's very confusing. I'll go through what they're basically saying here. Half of this tweet is true, half of it I don't like. You want the truth said to your face? There it is. Elon responds and he says, you have said the actual truth. Now we don't know what part Elon is saying is the actual truth. So let's go through this. Again, it's double negatives and misuse of the word disinterested. It's a strange tweet that Elon pinpointed on here. But the first part is absolutely true. Let's go to this. Jewish communities have been pushing the exact kind of hatred against whites that they claim to want people to stop using against them. Now I don't like generalizations. Not every Jewish person believes that. But it is true the Anti Defamation League was part and parcel with Black Lives Matter. It is true that some of the largest financiers of left wing anti white causes have been Jewish Americans. They went all in on woke, and it wasn't just ADL. It was some of the top Jewish organizations in the country that have done that. In fact, we have seen this with the recent retreat of Jewish donations that are no longer going to be administered to colleges. Right? Mark Rowan, Leon Kaufman. Can we get that full list? It's very powerful. The part of the so that's totally true. And by way, Tucker Carlson reinforces this. So I'm gonna kinda it was quite a day on the Internet. Tucker Carlson was inter interviewing Candace Owens. We have Candace Owens coming up next hour, and Tucker Carlson mentions that Jewish Americans have primarily been financing cultural Marxist ideas. We said this, by the way, last week, and people came after us. We came we actually said it in a different way. We said, I'm glad that Jewish Americans are reconsidering their financing of cultural Marxism, and people misunderstood it intentionally and slandered us as being anti Semites. But listen to this: Tucker Carlson is completely correct by saying this, that the philosophical foundation of anti whiteness has been largely financed by Jewish donors in the country. Play cut 92. Speaker 2: However, then I thought, well, wait a second. If the biggest donors at, say, Harvard have decided, well, we're gonna shut it down now. Where were you the last ten years when Speaker 1: they're before? Speaker 2: As Jenna said, you were allowing this, and then I found myself really hating those people, actually. That you're okay with that? On what grounds were you okay with that? Speaker 1: And I this is what I've been trying to explain to the pro Israel lobby that what you were seeing is lack of support. It's people that are asking the question is where were you Yeah. As we have endured all of this. You were paying Speaker 2: for it, actually. Speaker 1: Right. You were Speaker 2: paying for it. Speaker 1: You were you were paying for it. Speaker 2: You calling my children immoral for their skin color. You paid for that. Speaker 1: Yeah. And I So Speaker 2: why shouldn't I be mad at you? I don't understand. Speaker 0: So what what Tucker is saying is similar to part of the tweet that Elon isolated. That is true. That let's just say liberals, but that includes Jewish financiers of liberal causes didn't really care about University of Chicago having courses that saying, you know, the problem with whiteness. They didn't really care about American Express saying that we must eliminate whiteness. They didn't, in fact, they were supportive of it. A lot of liberals were okay with critical race theory, diversity, equity, inclusion. ADL went all in on the BLM type narrative, and ADL is one of many different organizations that were perfectly fine with the growing anti white wave. Now, to be clear, many of these Jews did not fully understand what they were financing. Their intentions were probably pretty good. As we've said, intentions mean next to nothing here. And I'm sure some of the intentions weren't so good, but let's just attention to the side. I'm not that interested in intentions. I'm interested in actions. Okay? Intentions are very hard to pinpoint. We get too caught up in the conservative movement on intentions. I learned this from the great Dennis Prager, who says stop focusing on intentions, focus on the actions. It's a much better way to judge whether or not something is right or wrong. Intentions, as I've said before, and there's a video that went viral, the Nazis thought they were doing good. They convinced themselves that they were doing good, when in reality, they were doing some of the greatest evil in the history of the species. So, Hamas thinks they're doing good. I could go through all this, but they're doing evil. So I'm not convinced that somebody's intentions are what matter. Many Jewish financiers culturally given money to George Washington University, Columbia, Yale, Dartmouth over and over and over again, hundreds of millions of dollars, billions of dollars, financing many nonprofits that many of them are now recognizing and realizing this was a bad idea. So I'm gonna build this out because the second part of the tweet I don't like, and it ties into some news that is not so good for AOC. It's not good for Ayanna Pressley. I'm gonna isolate that in just a second. But let me just say before I talk about my Patriot supply. It is sloppy. It is shallow. It is wrong and repulsive to call a great man Elon Musk an anti Semite. It cheapens the label of anti Semitism. It is not good for anybody.

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

🧵https://t.co/2TtdJ11qAG

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

Good Goys Gone Bad: Charlie Kirk Compilation Charlie didn't turn on israel- but israel turned on Charlie. The more I look into it the more I get the feeling he was considering running for president at some point and he's clearly not directly loyal to the Netanyahu crew.

Video Transcript AI Summary
This transcript covers claims that Jewish donors have funded open border neoliberal policies, cultural institutions, and nonprofits. "This is a beast created by secular Jews. And now it's coming for Jews, and they're like, what on earth happened?" It also cites "not just the colleges... It's Hollywood" and labels Epstein as "the first big scandal" with calls to "unseal all the Epstein documents in the Southern District Of New York" and to reveal "Everything." It notes "Alexander Acosta ... he was told to treat Epstein carefully because he was an intel asset" and asks "MI six, Saudi, or Mossad?" Beebe's claim: "You can't be MAGA if you're anti Israel." It cites polling: GOP "76%," Dems "36%," Now "eight%." It warns "This is the closest thing to the Holocaust that any of us have lived through" and urges Israel to "seek justice" without turning it into a regional war.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And Jewish donors, they have a lot of explaining to do, a lot of decoupling to do, because Jewish donors have been the number one funding mechanism of radical open border neoliberal quasi Marxist policies, cultural institutions, and nonprofits. This is a beast created by secular Jews. And now it's coming for Jews, and they're like, what on earth happened? And it's not just the colleges. It's the nonprofits. It's the movies. It's Hollywood. It's all of it. It's like time for you guys to wake up and say no more. Draw a line in the sand. I don't care if you hate me. Why don't you update them, Megan? Speaker 1: Well, this is the first big scandal, I'd say, of the Trump administration that's on team rational. It's not a fake media scandal like the left tries to create for president Trump every other day. It's one of the right's own making, and it's not going well. And it has to do with Jeffrey Epstein. Yeah. Let let me just ask you. Make some noise if you care about the Jeffrey Epstein scandal. Speaker 0: Raise your hand if it matters a lot to you. Raise your hand. So every hand of 7,000 people. Speaker 1: Everybody cares. It I think A lot. Speaker 0: I said a lot. Every hand. I'm open to it. If that's true, why don't you just tell us the prisoners' names who are on the same cell block as Jeffrey Epstein? Speaker 1: There's a lot. Speaker 0: No. That's BS. I'm sorry. The president The United States figured out whether they have HIPAA for federal prisoners. Tell us I mean, tell us who the other prisoners were if no one had access to it because all of a sudden, if we find out some of these prisoners had suspicious intel ties. Speaker 1: It's funny because you look back at the the past, Dan and Cash talked about Epstein all the time when they were in my business that Speaker 0: hasn't been a shtick of mine. Speaker 1: Mine neither. Mine neither. I I talked about myself. Right? Same. Same. But I am a lawyer by training, and I can smell BS when it's being shoveled to me. And it's very obvious to me right now that we've got spinners trying to mess with us in Washington on a story that is important, and here's why. Yes. Obviously, child sexual abuse matters. And if we have some ring of pedophiles running around, I mean, outside of Hollywood, we need to know. One of the main reasons that we voted Trump in was because we wanted real answers on real stories, and we didn't wanna be BSed anymore with a bunch of nonsense from our government that treated us like a bunch of stooges. Speaker 0: What is the one two three sequencing? Press conference, you would get rid of Bondi. What else to get us back on track towards transparency? I think the DOJ should immediately move to unseal all the Epstein documents in the Southern District Of New York. Speaker 1: Yeah. Everything. Everything except I think every solitary. Speaker 0: I think every file should be released to the public the same way as the JFK files. Let the American people decide. Do you think there's any intel community involvement in this? Speaker 1: I wouldn't be surprised one bit. I am convinced based on my own sources and my own reporting on this story, he wasn't one of ours. Speaker 0: So he was an American, which leads basically three options. MI six, Saudi, or Mossad? Yep. Which one would you choose? Speaker 1: I guess Mossad, given his connection to Ghislain Maxwell. So Speaker 0: what does that mean? Speaker 1: Well, I mean, it's possible that that's the reason everything's getting buried, that there is some treasure trove, and it's getting buried because Speaker 0: How many people here believe that? Raise your hand. Speaker 1: That was Well a fishy answer. Speaker 0: And, Megan, remember, Alexander Acosta in 02/2007, he said he was told to treat Epstein carefully because he was an intel asset. That was that was one of Trump's cabinet secretaries who was literally a US attorney three hours from here Speaker 1: Yep. Speaker 0: In Florida. He said that himself. He fully No. Again, I don't wanna I don't wanna feed into any of the, let's just say, speculative theories. But Alexander Acosta himself talked about Intel Asset. Yep. And you have to wonder that the timing of all this. Sunday night so you have the big beautiful bill. You have Independence Day weekend. Why are you doing this on a Sunday night? Was it Bury it. But you don't bury things on Sunday nights. Speaker 1: You do on a holiday weekend. You do. Yeah. Color away. They're traveling back from the Speaker 2: beach on Sunday night. They're dealing with traffic. They knew they were too smart to to think that they could get away with doing it on a Saturday night. Speaker 0: No. No. No. But he'll tell the truth and we will lose we will be like, if Bongino can't go and fight and solve this thing, then, like, I mean, what are we doing here? Speaker 1: I know. Speaker 0: Right? If Dan Bongino, who's like one of the greatest patriots we have Yep. Cannot go and reform the FBI with Kash Patel after we win a popular vote majority Right. Then I'm not I'm like, I will never give up, but I know for millions of people that will be met with just a sigh of cynicism. Speaker 3: The last I heard, Israel already controls something 40 to 50% of the territory in Gaza City. They've been warning people to get out for at least a couple of weeks now. Hamas have been stopping people at checkpoints and turning them back and shooting them if they don't stay in the city to be used as human shields by Hamas. So that's the current situation on the ground. Speaker 0: What other feedback or criticism would you have about this situation? I I know that it's impossible for anyone to listen to everything that you ever say, but looking at this from a American perspective, what else would you say things could have been handled differently? Maybe on the PR front, maybe also just on a a conduct front. Where where would you say as an outsider with things that could have been handled better, more efficiently, or with more precision? Author Ben Shapiro, author of Lions and Scavengers. We're gonna get to that in a second. I have one or two other questions on Israel. I think it's very important for our audience to hear this, though, because there is a an incessant campaign. And one thing a friend said to me interestingly, which is, okay, Charlie, we've pushed back against the media on COVID, on lockdowns, on Ukraine, on the border, on so, like, maybe we should also ask a question. Is the media totally presenting the truth when it comes to Israel? Just a question, you know, that maybe we shouldn't believe everything the media says because I know I've been conditioned to ask a lot more critical questions over the last couple of years. So, Ben, some people would accuse Israel of wanting to ethnically cleanse. Some people in the Israeli government are saying again, it's all over the place. Right? You have opinions all over. In your opinion, what would a good outcome five years from now be, and how does one respond to the claims of ethnic cleansing? Speaker 3: As far as your earlier question about what we believe from the media, one of the things that I find kind of astonishing in in some of the folks on the right who are highly critical of Israel is actually the the lack of credit the the lack of skepticism when it comes to legacy media. Legacy media are radically anti Israel overall. The New York Times can can certainly not be accused of being a pro Israel outlet. It'd be very difficult to make the accusation that the the Associated Press, which has wore hand in glove with Kamas for years or Reuters, that the these are these are wildly pro Israel outlets. And yet when it comes to the reporting, it seems to be sort of the the opposite. So the the perception of the legacy media is, like, owned by the Jews. Speaker 0: I was gonna say Ben. I'm pro Israel. You Jews own the media, Ben. So, I mean, come on. As you could tell by all the wonderful headlines you guys get. Speaker 3: Well, I mean, dude, the accusation that that we own the media has not prevented, you know, the Daily Wire from from employing people who radically disagree with me on all of these matters. I mean, I don't agree with Matt Walsh on foreign policy. Matt, obviously, is a major host over at Daily Wire. And that's just my shop when I'm I'm I'm overtly pro Israel. Right? I I'm not making any bones about this. I'm a Jew, and I'm a Zionist. I'm not gonna pretend that that to to say otherwise would be absolutely silly. To to suggest that that a some sort of atheistic Jewish person by birth who does not care about Judaism or Israel owning the New York Times means the New York Times is pro Israelis to ignore literally every bit of coverage they have ever done for my entire lifetime. Speaker 0: We we we're we're running out of time here. But just last question on this, Ben. I know this might be a a tougher question, but Beebe said, quote, I didn't like how he said this. I'll be honest. You can't be MAGA if you're anti Israel. I don't like it for a couple reasons. How how did you how did you analyze that statement from Beebe? Speaker 3: I mean and I I think that there is the ungenerous way of interpreting that and then the generous way of interpreting that. So ethnic cleansing, the idea presumably that that population movement is equivalent to ethnic cleansing. I think ethnic cleansing is a term that that's been fairly recently coined to describe population movement during war. And the reality is that's been ongoing for literally all of human history. The idea that that Israel is, quote, unquote, forcing people out of the Gaza Strip, that is not the stated policy of the Israeli government. The idea is if people want to leave, they can, but they're not being forced to leave. Again, moving people out of heavily urbanized areas that are honeycombed with terrorist booby traps pretty much everywhere is not the same thing as, quote, unquote, ethnic cleansing. And I think that ethnic cleansing is is very often used as sort of a a softer form of of the genocide attack. The idea being that Israel is trying to kill everyone, which, of course, is not true. The ungenerous way is to suggest that you have to hold a particular position on every Israeli governmental activity in order to in order to be MAGA, which, of course, is not true. I mean, you can disagree from the right or from the left with with Bibi's policies, and and you can still be plenty MAGA. I think the idea that that Bibi is putting out there is that if you are taking Hamas' side against Israel in a conflict, it is very difficult to align that with the with the stated positions of the Trump administration or what president Trump himself is doing right now. Speaker 1: You you Speaker 3: can't and that much, I certainly is true. Speaker 0: You cannot look. I I think you can have disagreements on Israel and still be MAGA, obviously. You should be America first. But if you're pro Hamas, you're something darker. Speaker 1: You and I are both supporters of Israel and Yeah. Have defended Israel since the beginning of this conflict and and spoken out about the antisemitism that has erupted on these college campuses many, many, many, many times. And something's happening, though, with this whole debate that is really bothering me, and I wonder if you're feeling it too. So I I mean, I genuinely believe you'd be hard pressed to find somebody in the public eye who's been as outspoken a defender of not every move Israel's taken in the war, but of Israel's right to defend itself and of the the just backward awfulness that we've been seeing on college campuses and the backlash against American Jews, then yours truly. I mean, I have been at the pointy end of the spear on this. And I Speaker 0: completely agree with that. Speaker 1: And I it was all heartfelt, and it remains heartfelt. Speaker 0: Yes. Speaker 1: However, however, I my contention here is that some in the pro Israel camp are so knee jerk about calling you antisemitic or getting deeply offended if you say anything that doesn't align with their narrative that it undermines their own cause. And I have to tell you, I find it very irritating because I do feel like some of us have earned the right to have some credibility on the subject of Israel and don't wanna be called those names when we have some mild pushback on some of the overreaches, whether it's, you know, whether they're winning or losing the propaganda war right now. And my contention is they've begun to lose it. And I realize it's propaganda coming at us from Hamas, but they their their numbers have turned. Here in America, they've turned. Not so much with Republicans, a little bit with Republicans, but but completely with the Democrat party and with independents. They they have shifted mightily from at least double digits highs to single digit lows now with the with when it comes to approval. And, also, with respect to you and I speculated about this at the Turning Point event, whether the possibility of Jeffrey Epstein possibly being a Mossad agent or asset or affiliated with, that's been turned around on me too to you must be anti Semitic. What the hell? That's such bullshit. Speaker 0: I Speaker 1: The same people who say, you can criticize Israel. That's fine. We won't call you anti Semitic if you criticize Israel. Turn around immediately and say, you're anti Semitic for even raising that. I completely reject that, and I've raised this as a pushback against my friends on that particular strain of the aisle to watch it because you don't wanna alienate people who are openly your friends by going nuts in your crackdowns on mild pushback on anything related to Israel. Now you Speaker 0: take it. I'm so I'm I'm so glad you brought this up. And I would second that. Megan, I think I have a bulletproof resume showing my defense of Israel both on campus, on social media, to to great, you know, let's just say mockery and scorn at times where because I believe it. Right? I I believe in the scriptural land rights given to Israel. I believe in fulfillment of prophecy. And again, I'm not a theologian, but I'm a Christian. My life was changed in Israel. The spiritual energy is so amazing there. I I want them to win. I've said that repeatedly. Same. And however, Megan, you're hitting on something very potent and important. Now let me first say, I don't wanna judge an entire group because there's been many people in the per Israel world that have been very sweet, very kind, very nuanced, very Charlie. You know, you're with us. You don't have to agree all the time. However, and I and I will say this, the behavior by a lot, both privately and publicly, are pushing people like you and me away. Not like we're gonna be pro Hamas. Not like we're gonna but we're like, honestly, the way you are treating me is so repulsive. I have text messages, Megan, calling me an anti Semite. I am learning biblical Hebrew and writing a book on the Shabbat. I honor the Shabbat, literally the Jewish Sabbath. I visit Israel and fight for it. And there's another article out in the Times of Israel today. I could read it on air. I was just reading before I got on. Charlie, what are you doing? Like, why are you what am I doing? I'm sorry. Like, let's just take a step back here. Like, I'm an American citizen. Yes. I want Israel to win. Yes. I'm a Christian. But, like, the sum of the mess and you saw I mean, you've seen how I've been treated, Megan, by some, not all, by some. Speaker 1: No. It's very irritating. It's it's been so unfair. They they were coming after you after a turning point for among other things. They had Dave Smith there. Dave Smith isn't allowed to criticize Israel. You had both sides. The the Israeli side was overrepresented. Speaker 0: No. You're not allowed to. It's even worse than that. Again, I would just wanna repeat for the fifth time. I love Israel. I want Israel to win. But my moral character is now being put into question, Megan. Not my decisions. Not like, hey. Are you doing this? Is it smart or is it dumb? But no. I am a bad person if I do this. And it's a I I could go I mean, I you saw it, Megan. It was trending on Twitter. Thousands of tweets and text messages. And if I were to be charitable and generous, I will say, the people that are attacking me are in a hyperparanoid state because they're at war, and war tends to make things black and white, and you're a hammer looking for a nail. So I'm trying to be charitable, Megan. Literally, I'm trying to cut as much slack as I can. Right? They go, okay. What would it be like if all of a sudden I'm starting to see a pattern of behavior similar to what my grandparents saw in nineteen thirties Germany online? How would I behave? So that's like my charitable kind of over compensation spirit. At the same time, I'm like, but you're it's it's not defensible to be dumb. Right? Yeah. Speaker 1: So And it's offensive. It's offensive to those of us who have been out there defending them in in many instances against critics on our own side. And now you have a couple of comments like, well, what about this? Well, has it gone on too long? Like, is it time to wrap it up? And the thing about Epstein is just so bizarre. I don't know who he was an agent for. It might have been Israel or an asset, or it might have been nobody, but we're allowed to speculate about that. It's like there's some rule. You can't go there when it comes to Israel. Speaker 0: Well, you and I believe that we're Americans and Americans first, Period. End of story. We are citizens of this nation. Okay? That's Israel, we have funded. We have supported. And they're up against a sea of Islamic totalitarianism, and we should be cheering for them. Right? Because they're up against barbarians and and monsters, and we want them to win. However, here is Megan Kelly and Charlie Kirk combined probably 30,000,000 social media followers, like pretty right? And you and I have been holding this down, and you you probably get the negative, oh, you're just shilling for Israel. I'm like, okay. I'm gonna do what's right regardless of the feedback. Right? But then all of a sudden, like, I host a person that I I moderate the debate of, my dear. Right? Right. And I give equal time to Josh Hammer, equal time to a pro Israel advocate, and my moral character is being put into question. And so I I just I think it's a hyper paranoid, like, we're just gonna try to we're we're gonna just stamp out everything type type of practice, but it goes to the point where if, for example, if I I have less ability sometimes online to criticize the Israeli government about backlash than actual Israelis do. And that's really, really weird, isn't it, Megan? Speaker 1: It that's not right. Wrong headed. I I'll tell you this for me. I got some blowback after saying Mossad possibilities with Epstein, a comment behind which I stand. I mean, I really and I've, of course, reported what Alan Dershowitz has said as his lawyer. He says I think he would have told me. He didn't say he had any of those connections. I hear all that. That doesn't mean it's not true. I think all these things should be explored. It's one of the many things that should be explored around Epstein. But saying that and also saying he might be a US asset, etcetera, doesn't make you anti Semitic. That's fucking crazy. And then we get to last week, I go on Piers Piers Morgan. Right? So I go on Piers Morgan last week, and I don't talk about Israel a lot on this show. I just like, covering the day to day of a conflict like this is not my thing. It's not what we do here at the Megan Kelly show. We haven't done it for Ukraine. We haven't done it for Israel. We haven't done it for a lot of conflicts, but we'll talk about it when big things happen. So Piers talks about it a lot. Piers asked me it was a very interesting kinda culture study. So he asked me about the the photos of the starving children out of Gaza. And I said a couple of things, both of which got a fair amount of pickup. Alright. So first, this is what I said about the photos. Listen to Sop 10. Well, I'm always reluctant to put too much stock in the images coming out of Gaza, that that phrase, because they're manipulated, and they're masters of propaganda, and they're fine having their own children starve just as long as they can put them on camera and show them off to the world. That that's Hamas. And, frankly, it's lot of Palestinians, so I'm very skeptical of taking those images at face value and saying it's Israel's fault. Okay. So that clip gets circulating Speaker 0: I'm with you on that. Speaker 1: A mill a million times by my Israeli friends and my Jewish friends online. Like, go, Megan. Yeah. Okay. Great. Cool. Cool. Cool. Yeah. She's right on. Look at her you know, speak truth to Piers. And then Piers released as a as a separate clip my follow-up to that comment. Okay? And and here's that. Speaker 0: Not a lot of nuance, Megan. It's only tribalism. Speaker 1: That's right. So here's sod 11. Israel, whether it realizes it or not, has made itself the villain of the world in in letting this thing go go on so long. They have lost support amongst their dearest friends. And even the entire Democrat party here in The United States has turned against them, and they're losing Republicans by the day here in America, which is their most important ally. So whether the fight continues to be just or not is almost irrelevant. As Trump said when he was running this time last year, not yet elected, time to wrap it up. And that's how I feel too. And I've given Israel a long berth. I fully understand as an American who was attacked on 09/11, my country was that, you know, when you attack The United States and you kill thousands of our citizens, and Israel was in this position on 10/07, it's fine to respond, and it doesn't have to be proportionate. Whoever said it has to be proportionate. But what Israel's doing now is losing its standing with the rest of the world. It's starting to lose too even with its closest friends, its moral reputation, its moral, high ground. And, as Trump said a year ago, time to wrap it up. Cue Well said. The 25 text messages from people I know, like friends who are pro Israel. Like, I'm so sad that you've left us. I'm so sad you let's debate it. You know, many Jewish, advocates think, let me come on your show, and we'll debate. There's nothing to debate. I'm on Israel's side. Just stop. Me observing Speaker 0: I totally agree. Speaker 1: That you're losing the propaganda war and that this has gone on for about two years now. And look. I mean, I pulled the stats. Support for Israel's military action in Gaza by party ID. GOP in June 2024, 76%. Now 71, so they lost 5%. Dems in October 2023, 36%. Now it's at eight. Independence, October 2023, it was 47%. Now it's 25%. You go under 35, you have almost zero support across The United States, your closest ally. I I see what's happening, and it's my job to comment honestly on it. But I am sick of being lectured on, like, you you have to see it exactly as we see it and support everything, or you're you're against us. Speaker 0: So so this is so important, Megan. And, again, I don't want not every you cannot say everyone in the pros are and I don't say it acts that way. But I Right. I got texts about you, Megan. Sam, why is Megan, like, doing the bidding of Hamas? I was like, what are you talking about? Megan's the best. Like, what she's amazing. And I said, why are you texting me about Megan? And I I I at that point and so this is what they don't understand. You and I, Megan, and Tucker is in the same category, and they've tried to go after Tucker. Yeah. Is that the and and the more you attack our moral character, the actually, the more we're gonna double down in the direction because 100%. I don't do it that way. Okay? Speaker 1: Right. Speaker 0: Like, when tell me I'm wrong. Cool. Tell me if I've got my facts wrong. By the way, on the Epstein thing, Naftali Bennett says he was an Epstein agent. We have to be pursuers of truth. They've denied it. Fine. Let's keep digging. Okay. Fine. But the the the the thing that I don't think I think is being lost is, like, on some part of the population, you can scold them into silence. Right? But if I have any deviation of a purity test, any deviation whatsoever, such as hosting a focus group, right, Megan, with a bunch of our students that went viral, having Dave Smith or Tucker at my event, it is all of a sudden, oh, Charlie is a, he's he's no longer with us and all that. So wait a second. What do you mean? What does with us mean exactly? Right? Mhmm. I'm an American. Okay? Like, I I I represent this country, and I I don't even understand that paradigm. But, Megan, I think you would agree at this. I wanna make sure we fast, like, really zero in on this. Personality types like you, myself, and Tucker, the more that you guys privately and publicly call our character into question, which is not isolated. Right? I'm Megan, it'll be one thing if it was one text or two text. It is dozens of texts. Yes. Then we start to say, hold the boat here. And and to be fair, some of my really good Jewish friends are like, that's not all of us. It's all. But these are leaders too though. Right? These are these are stakeholders. Right? And so look. I I'm I'm I'm afraid because again, I want civilization to win. I want the West to win. I don't want the Islam of fascist barbarians to storm the gates of Jerusalem. I want the holy sites protected. I believe in the holy land. I love that Jesus walked on water there and rose from the dead and preached in the, the Mount Of Beatitudes. Like, I I feel the connection to Israel. And I but at the same time simultaneously, when the hostile reaction is that now Meghan and Charlie are enemies. Right. Boy, I'll tell you. Like, you're you're you're you're you're gonna you're not gonna I won't say lose, but you will weaken and just basically deflate two of your strongest advocates if that continues. Speaker 1: Right. And it to me, I laugh because it's like, I've been bullied by the best of them. The best. And it it didn't work, and it's not going to work with them. And the more you try to tell me I can't criticize Israel, the more likely I am to do it, to focus on exactly what you're doing. Right? Like, what what are you doing that you're so defensive? You don't own me. I don't I don't take $1 of money from any Jewish affiliated group. That's not that's never been what my what my show's model. Take you know, Cozy Earth is my sponsor. People like Genucel. Those are the people I take. And I probably would feel reluctant to criticize Genucel, which is a great product, so I probably wouldn't do it anyway. My point is simply, I have my honest opinions, which is why I had credibility for the two years I've been defending them. Right? And I still have that credibility, and I don't need lectures from my friends who are more pro Israel than I am or who are just American Jewish people who are concerned about what's happening. I don't need lectures on my coverage. Okay? I'll call it like I see it. And you have no right to come on this show and demand a debate with me because I've said something you disagree with. It's my show and I'll decide the coverage we do here. Speaker 2: I just have way too many questions that makes me think about what the motives are. And if we go dark, I'll put all those things out there. Yeah. How did how did these guys not know this was taking place? Speaker 0: So I've been in Israel many times. The whole country is a fortress. When I first heard this story, I still had the same gut instinct that I did initially. I find this very hard to believe. I've been to that Gaza border. You you cannot go 10 feet without running into a 19 year old with an AR 15 or an automatic machine gun that is an IDF soldier. Right? The whole country is surveilled. And so let me just kind of go through this. We don't talk about Israeli politics very often, and most Americans don't know this. The last nine months, Israel was on the brink of civil war. It's not an exaggeration. This judicial stuff, there were there were hundreds of thousands of Israelis taking to the streets because Bibi Netanyahu was basically redefining the Israeli constitution. That's not an exaggeration. Right? He said the judicial branch has too much power. There were protests planned this week against Netanyahu where they anticipated tens of thousands of people to take to the streets. That's all gone, Patrick. Netanyahu now has an emergency government and a mandate to lead. I'm not I'm not willing to say to go so far that saying that Netanyahu knew or there was intelligence here, but I think some questions need to be asked. Was there a stand down order? Was there a stand down order? Six hours? I don't believe it. Israel's the side of New Jersey. When I took a helicopter ride from Jerusalem to the Gaza border, it's forty five minutes. Speaker 1: Wow. Speaker 0: Six hours. They're livestreaming the killing of Jews. Was did somebody in the government say stand down? That is a legitimate non conspiracy question. The whole country is the IDF. The whole country is. Yeah. And you're trying to tell me that they're going to concerts and kibbutzes and schools and by reports, six hours. Let's say it's three hours. That's suspect. Go ahead, Rob. Speaker 4: It's also not like a right wing reporting. This is from the New York Times. The long wait for help as massacre unfolds in Israel. I can't think of a more liberal news outlet than New York Speaker 0: Times. And and by the way, I I'm actually very pro Israel. So let me be very I mean Mhmm. So I'm not exactly I think we all are. No. No. I just wanna make sure my position is clear here. But I would so Patrick, there are other explanations. It's possible that the Netanyahu government was double crossed by bad agents. Okay? That's dark, but it's not as dark as what we're talking about. Okay? Another aspect is that Netanyahu might have traitors in his government, like legitimate traitors that have infiltrated. I was texting with some senior people in the IDF and they said, Charlie, can't say too much, but let's just say the same problem you have with the left in America we have here in Israel. So there's something to think about. Just something to think about, right? Is that maybe there are some people within those intel agencies that aren't as sympathetic. Or maybe, Patrick, maybe they might have gotten a tip, they might have gotten whispers, but no one thought it would be 1,200 Jews dead. That's a potential, right? Because here's the essence of it. The essence is this: this is the closest thing to the Holocaust that any of us have lived through. But the fact is now Bibi and the Israeli hard right government has a mandate I've to be careful the way I say this to they're going to try to ethnically cleanse Gaza. I mean, that's and I don't use that term lightly. Okay? They're talking about basically removing 2,500,000 people from there. Okay? And honestly, they have a mandate to go seek justice and revenge. They do. There is This idea that they need to have a truce or a peace treaty, that's morally crap after you see women and children be burned alive and dragged to the streets. But there are some serious questions here, Patrick. And let me tell you, my pattern recognition over the last five years has become pretty sharp. COVID, Maui fires, you know, Epstein. When I see a story and it doesn't click, we're our guts are usually right. I just want to be very sorry to interrupt. I'm saying that's what they're going to be accused of. If there are some people in public life in Israel that Patrick, what did your pilot guy say? I want only Jews in Israel. Right? Okay. That is a form of ethnically cleansing because 20% of Israel is Arab. Correct. Mean, look, here so let me also make sure I criticize both sides. Okay? So I'm gonna criticize the people that, you know, do the paragliding and it's sick. Lindsey Graham is an irresponsible lawmaker for what he's saying. Bombing Iranian oil depots? This thing could get wildly out of control very, very quickly. The last thing America needs is a kinetic war against Iran, an 87,000,000 person country that has a pretty fierce fighting spirit, a country at five times the size of Iraq. Five times the size of Iraq. We're gonna go start bombing oil depots. Yeah. That could get Russia further involved, China involved. Yeah. Look. The Armageddon situation is that for Israel, the Armageddon situation is that they overreact so much that they lose their Arab neutrality. Right now, they have neutrality with Egypt. If they overreact, they could lose that. They have warm conversations. I won't say a peace deal yet with Saudi Arabia. They could lose that. Jordan plays ball because America demands they play ball. They could lose that. Syria, Bashar al Assad, he acts as if it doesn't exist, but that could change in a moment's notice. Right? Lebanon via Hezbollah is already there. They could be all of a sudden dealing with a 15 country invasion of Speaker 2: Israel. Can they handle that? Speaker 0: They have in the past. I mean, the the Six Day War, the Yom Kippur War. The Yom Kippur War, for example, they were invaded from every direction. At the the Balfour declaration, when they were came a country in 1948, every Arab country declared war on them. Yeah. And and they were they almost lost the country. And to their credit, they held it off, and they earned the right to be Israel. I I I The women have no rights The answer is it shouldn't be a top priority of the American government because we have so many problems here to execute a CIA coup d'etat in another country. You have to put sanctions on. You have to put them in check. You have to try to, in my personal opinion, allow Israel to seek justice. At the same time, you cannot allow this to turn into a regional broader war. You know why? Because the adult America is gonna have to come clean it up. That's why. If we allow if we just kinda say, oh, it doesn't this thing turns into a regional conflict, we're gonna have more troops on the ground, and we're gonna have to go clean up this mess, as Trump calls it, in the region of sand and death while our own country is disintegrating and collapsing.

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

🧵https://t.co/HD63I7jTs5

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

The Charlie Kirk Show November 16, 2023 | FULL Please Spread/Download/Post

Video Transcript AI Summary
Topics covered include Newsom in China, Musk accused of antisemitism over a tweet, with Musk defending that claim; AIPAC's pledge to spend 100 million dollars to defeat the squad; a realignment of white working-class and minority voters; the idea that Twitter is the incubator of elite opinion and TikTok is the incubator of idiocy for generation Z; Seamus Brunner's Controllogarchs alleging Gates' food patents and Soros and Buffett profiting from abortion through Cayman shell companies, plus AI and CBDCs as threats; the FCC's digital discrimination order on a three two party line vote and its implications for broadband deployment; the first prosecution of its kind under 18 USC 241 resulting in seven months' prison for Douglas Mackey; Candace Owens on Israel, Ben Shapiro dispute; Heather McDonald on race/crime statistics.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The Charlie Kirk show begins in one minute. The Charlie Kirk show begins in thirty seconds. The Charlie Kirk show begins in ten seconds. Speaker 1: The Charlie Kirk show starts now. Speaker 0: But today was supposed to be Gavin Newsom's day. After a romantic first date in Beijing where Gia showed Gavin his exquisite birds, intertwined trees, custom toboggans, Gavin thought he was a shoo in for a second date. She was flying into Gavin's hometown, San Francisco. And when Gavin found out, he grabbed the broom and cleaned up. Sorry, vagrants. I have a date. He waited for Chi at the airport, marveled at him as he descended onto the tarmac. And the way Gavin looked at Chi was kinda like how Taylor Swift looks at Travis Kelce. Gavin was ready to take the relationship to the next level until he found out there was someone else, Joe Biden. The president flew in on Air Force One. Now Newsom had competition. When Chi saw Joe, they couldn't keep their hands off each other. As Joe likes to brag, he spent more time with Chi than anyone else. Not to mention the fact that Chi's guys bribed the Biden family. The chemistry was unmistakable. Speaker 2: I've never doubted what you've told me in terms of your candid nature in which you speak. Speaker 3: I still remember our interactions very vividly, and it always gives me a lot of thoughts. Speaker 4: Whatever stage of development it may reach, China will never pursue hegemony or expansion and will never impose its will on others. China does not seek spheres of influence and will not fight a cold war or a hot war with anyone. China will remain committed to dialogue and impose confrontation and build partnerships instead of alliances. It will continue to pursue a mutually beneficial strategy of opening up. The modernization we are pursuing is not for China alone. We are ready to work with all countries to advance global modernization featuring peaceful development, mutually beneficial cooperation, and common prosperity, and to build a community with a shared future for mankind. Speaker 5: Let's talk about our dependence on China. Today, we're actually talking about Xi Jinping, picking on Donald Trump's word vermin to talk about that status quo. You know what's vermin? What's running around San Francisco on a given day before Gavin Newsom cleaned it up on a dime to roll out the red carpet for Xi Jinping. If he could do that for Xi Jinping, he could have done it on ordinary day, and yet we're here sitting talking not about the substance of that, but on one word that Donald Trump said in some speech in Miami. This is what's wrong with the mainstream media. Focus on the substance, and let's have an actual policy debate rather than talking to a presidential candidate instead of the policy substance of what's actually going on in the country, picking on some word that Donald Trump said on a certain day and asking me for comment on it. Speaker 6: You see, we're in a very important time in our nation's history. You look around in this room. Don't give me this nonsense that Americans are giving up. That is not true. Okay, get your tickets. Amfest.com. Amfst.com. Amfest.com. Huge speakers to be announced tomorrow. Mass of speakers. Can't wait to share that all with you. Excellent event last evening in Reno, Nevada. Really great people. We packed it out 1,300 patriots. Telling you the remnant is strengthening. It really is amazing to see. So God bless all of you that attended our event last evening. Lots to cover today. We got Candace Owen joining the show. We got so much stuff happening. Email us freedom@charliekirk.com. We're about to get started. Speaker 1: The Charlie Kirk show. Every day is a battle for your mind raging. Information coming from every angle with the will to deceive. Fear not. You found the place for truth. The voice of a generation that still has the will to believe in the greatest country in the history of the world. This is the Charlie Kirk show. Buckle up. Here we go. Speaker 6: Hello, everybody. Radio stations across the country. Honored to be with you. You can email us as always freedom@charliekirk.com and subscribe to our podcast. Excellent event last evening in Reno, Nevada. It's great to see so many of you. I cannot emphasize enough the win for liberty, the win for humanity that the liberation of Twitter has meant for all of us. It's remarkable. Liberating Twitter from what it once was to what it is now is a win for the narrative. It's a win for truth. It's a win as we try to fight back against this uniparty regime, the tyrants, and the authoritarian dictators that are running the country. Elon Musk, even if they shut down Twitter today, will go down as a major hero for allowing us to be able to speak, to question narratives, to get the truth out. Elon Musk got himself in a little Speaker 7: bit of Speaker 6: trouble yesterday. Elon Musk responded to a tweet that I actually don't think the tweet is that smart. I think one part of it is legit, but I think another part of it is not so great. But the essence of what Elon was responding to is a major thought crime in America that the world's wealthiest man would comment on this is historic. So here's the tweet and it's responding to a video and the video was basically a white father with his white son saying to his son, Hey, you think that, you know, you're posting online all this anti Semitic stuff, why don't you go and say this to these Jewish families face? Pretty powerful advertisement. This is the ad, okay? It's about a minute long, it's a powerful ad, and then a person on Twitter responded to this advertisement, and then Elon responded to the person responding to the advertisement. It's important. Bear with us. Because right now, Elon Musk is being targeted like never before. Elon Musk was supposed to speak at a summit today, and he's been canceled. They don't want to hear from Elon Musk because they are tarring and feathering him as an anti Semite. They've come after this program for calling us anti Semites. They're coming after Elon Musk for calling, they're calling him an anti Semite. So here's the advertisement. It's a powerful ad. Play Cut 79. I saw what you've been posting. Speaker 2: Hitler was right. Speaker 6: I didn't teach you that. You hide behind your screen, spewing all this hatred and ugliness. Speaker 2: You got something you wanna say? Get out of Speaker 6: the truck and say it to their faces. Okay. So that that advertisement then was responded to by this person, the artist formerly known as Eric. Quote, okay. Jewish communities have been pushing the exact kind of dialectical hatred against whites that they claim to want people to stop using against them. I am deeply disinterested in giving the tiniest swear word, Let's just say tiniest crap now about Western Jewish populations coming to the disturbing realization that those hordes of minorities that support flooding their country don't exactly like them too much. You want truth said to your face? There it is. Now, let me just say, this is not is not a very well written tweet. I said it's very confusing. I'll go through what they're basically saying here. Half of this tweet is true, half of it I don't like. You want the truth said to your face? There it is. Elon responds and he says you have said the actual truth. Now we don't know what part Elon is saying is the actual truth, so let's go through this. Again, it's double negatives and misuse of the word disinterested. It's a strange tweet that Elon pinpointed on here. But the first part is absolutely true. Let's go to this. Jewish communities have been pushing the exact kind of hatred against whites that they claim to want people to stop using against them. Now, I don't like generalizations. Not every Jewish person believes that. But it is true the Anti Defamation League was part and parcel with Black Lives Matter. It is true that some of the largest financiers of left wing anti white causes have been Jewish Americans. They went all in on woke and it wasn't just ADL, it was some of the top Jewish organizations in the country that have done that. In fact, we have seen this with the recent retreat of Jewish donations that are no longer going to be administered to colleges. Right? Mark Rowan, Leon Kaufman. Can we get that full list? It's very powerful. The part of the so that's totally true. And by the way, Tucker Carlson reinforces this. So I'm gonna kinda it was quite a day on the Internet. Tucker Carlson was inter interviewing Candace Owens. We have Candace Owens coming up next hour. And Tucker Carlson mentions that Jewish Americans have primarily been financing cultural Marxist ideas. We said this, by the way, last week, and people came after us. We came we actually said it in a different way. We said, I'm glad that Jewish Americans are reconsidering their financing of cultural Marxism. And people misunderstood it intentionally and slandered us as being anti Semites. But listen to this, Tucker Carlson is completely correct by saying this, that the philosophical foundation of anti whiteness has been largely financed by Jewish donors in the country. Play Cut 92. Speaker 8: However, then I thought, well, wait a second. If the biggest donors at, say, Harvard have decided, well, we're gonna shut it down now. Where were you the last ten years when they Speaker 9: were going Speaker 8: for WeisGenocide? You were allowing this, and then I found myself really hating those people actually. That you're okay with that? On what grounds were you okay with that? Speaker 9: And I this is what I've been trying to explain to the pro Israel lobby that what you are seeing is lack of support, is people that are asking the question is where were you? Yeah. As we have endured all of this. You were paying Speaker 8: for it actually. Speaker 9: Right. You were Speaker 8: paying for it. Speaker 9: You were you were paying for it. Speaker 8: Because you were calling my children immoral for their skin color. You paid for that. And I don't So why shouldn't I be mad at you? I don't understand. Speaker 6: So what Tucker is saying is similar to part of the tweet that Elon isolated that is true. That let's just say liberals, but that includes Jewish financiers of liberal causes didn't really care about University of Chicago having courses that saying, you know, the problem with whiteness. They didn't really care about American Express saying that we must eliminate whiteness. They didn't, in fact, they were supportive of it. A lot of liberals were okay with critical race theory, diversity, equity, inclusion. ADL went all in on the BLM type narrative and ADL is one of many different organizations that were perfectly fine with the growing anti white wave. Now to be clear, many of these Jews did not fully understand what they were financing. Their intentions were probably pretty good. As we've said, intentions mean next to nothing here. And I'm sure some of the intentions weren't so good, but let's just attention to the side. I'm not that interested in intentions. I'm interested in actions. Okay? Intentions are very hard to pinpoint. We get too caught up in the conservative movement on intentions. I learned this from the great Dennis Prager, who says stop focusing on intentions, focus on the actions. It's a much better way to judge whether or not something is right or wrong. Intentions, as I've said before, and there's a video that went viral, the Nazis thought they were doing good. They convinced themselves that they were doing good, when in reality, they were doing some of the greatest evil in the history of the species. Again, So Hamas thinks they're doing good. I could go through all this, but they're doing evil. So I'm not convinced that somebody's intentions are what matter. Many Jewish financiers culturally given money to George Washington University, Columbia, Yale, Dartmouth over and over and over again. Hundreds of millions of dollars, billions of dollars financing many nonprofits that many of them are now recognizing and realizing this was a bad idea. So I'm going to build this out because the second part of the tweet I don't like, and it ties into some news that is not so good for AOC. It's not good for Ayanna Pressley. I'm going to isolate that in just a second. But let me just say before I talk about my Patriot supply, it is sloppy. It is shallow. It is wrong and repulsive to call a great man, Elon Musk, an anti Semite. It cheapens the label of anti Semitism. It is not good for anybody. Okay, My Patriot Supply. I want to tell you guys about My Patriot Supply. It is an amazing service that you guys can have. In fact, they will bring your emergency preparedness food to you. Go to mypatriotsupply.com. That is mypatriotsupply.com. You are nine meals away from anarchy. Go to mypatriotsupply.com, to make sure that you have the emergency preparedness food for what might be coming next. I know it feels like things are falling apart. Make sure you are prepared for your family right now. Mypatriotsupply.com. That is mypatriotsupply.com. Email us freedom@CharlieKirk.com. Yesterday was one of the livelier days in the history of the Internet. We're just getting started. Stay right there. Noble Gold Investments is pleased to let you know that gold was the best investment class for 02/2022. Through all our record breaking inflation, crashing stock market, the crypto scams, there is one asset that has held its own, gold. According to longtermtrends.net, gold has actually outperformed the S and P 500, Dow, and Bitcoin for 02/2022. Had you invested in the S and P five hundred a year ago, you would be down more than 20%. If you invested in Bitcoin a year ago, you'd be down more than 65%. If you invested in the Dow a year ago, you'd be down almost 10%. Yes. Gold has outperformed them all in 02/2022, and silver is not far behind. Yes. While the world was busy hailing other assets as the real hedge, gold and silver are the only assets that would have protected your wealth. So join the thousands of others by opening a gold IRA or silver IRA with Noble Gold Investments. Get in right now, and you'll bag a free one fourth of an ounce American Gold Eagle coin with every qualified IRA of $50,000 or more. You can't go wrong with Noble Gold Investments and their thousands of five star reviews. Call Noble Gold at (877) 646-5347 to add real gold to your IRA. That's (877) 646-5347. We frequently get asked the question, who's in charge? Who is calling the shots? So it's clear it's not Joe Biden. There's somebody else that is in charge. Well, our next guest is Seamus Brunner, who has a new book out that is very interesting. Exposing the Billionaire Class, Their Secret Deals, and the Globalist Plot to Dominate Your Life. Sounds uplifting. Seamus, welcome to the program. Speaker 10: Hey, Charlie. It's great to be with you. Speaker 6: Tell us about your book. Speaker 10: Yeah. So I hear it all the time that the pandemic is over. The pandemic is in the path. That's not true. The pandemic was a blueprint for the future and you see it all the time. Our world is getting smaller. It's getting more and more controlled. We're losing control over our children's education, over everything from our food sources to our finances. And so this really lays out the people who are pushing this agenda. Speaker 6: Well, walk us through some of the specifics and the details that that are in the book, and, you know, we can go from there. Speaker 10: Sure. So we follow the money. We follow it all the way to the top at the Government Accountability Institute. We followed it to Davos. I know you've done some great work on this stuff. Let's see. Like, Bill Gates and the the food scheme he's got going. Everybody knows that Bill Gates is buying up all this farmland in The US. They know he's investing in creepy fake food companies, but they're you know, they're not really sure why. And so a lot of it is about money. We we follow the patents. Bill Gates, I mean, as a software salesman, he knows all about licensing and all about intellectual property. His father was an intellectual property attorney. He really helped Microsoft get off the ground. Well, he has used that intellectual property knowledge to start cornering the markets in industries like food. So for example, he buys into Beyond Meats and Impossible Foods only after they have received their patents. And that's kind of the whole thing with these fake foods. It's they say it's about climate change and solve you know, solving climate change, saving the planet. What it's really about is patenting our food sources. They patented the seeds. They've patented the fertilizers, and now they're patenting the meats. Speaker 6: Yeah. So, I mean, the more sinister explanation is that Bill Gates might wanna have less less people. What what what is the or what is the reason you would say that Bill Gates wants to control our food supply? Speaker 10: Well, that's absolutely true, and it sounds like a conspiracy theory. I thought it was too. And you see these clips every now and then of Bill Gates saying there needs to be less people. But that's what all of the characters in this book actually believe. They think that the Earth is vastly overpopulated, and population needs to go down. They don't ever really give you specifics on how they plan to bring the population down. Okay, Speaker 6: everybody. Welcome back. I mean the essence is this: Why do Jews continue to support institutions that hate them? Let's just make it as plain as possible, right? The the part of the tweet though that I want to isolate that I don't like is the kind of bitterness here. Quote, this person said that Elon responded to, I'm deeply disinterested in giving the tiniest crap now about Western Jewish populations coming to the disturbing realization that those hordes of minorities that support flooding their country don't exactly like them too much. This is where I disagree. I support own awakening. I think it's awesome that anybody wakes up regardless of if they did something prior in the past. I don't like that kind of bitterness and that kind of cynicism, to be honest. This person says I'm deeply disinterested in giving the tiniest crap about Western Jewish populations. I see it completely different. I think I think it's exciting and hopeful that Jewish Americans are starting to divest dollars from university campuses. I think that it's exciting when any population starts to reconsider their prior views. So kind of break out of the bitterness. Yes, of course, it's true that traditionally Jews have been funding in America institutions that hate them. And that's too bad. That's tragic. But there's the fact that they're discontinuing that, that they're speaking out against it, that gives me hope. So actually, I do have concern for that. So I I don't know if Elon was responding to that part of it. I think it was probably the first part. If I had to summarize again, I don't know. I can't read Elon's mind. He's gonna have to defend himself. He has sent out subsequent tweets mainly focused on the ADL saying why does the ADL turn a blind eye to anti white, anti Asian hatred while we import the third world that hates Jews and hates everybody? So he's clarified that. So to his credit, it's pretty clear. But this is very important. And we're starting to see some legitimate hope and movement in this direction, which I think is it was very exciting, which is that this announcement yesterday, AIPAC, the American Israeli Political Action Committee, has announced that they are going to spend $100,000,000 to defeat the squad. They're gonna spend a $100,000,000 to in Democrat primaries to go after AOC, Ilan Omar, Jamal Bowman, Ayanna Pressley, Rashida Tlaib, and there's two other black women. I don't know who they are. I think it might be Fox is the other one. I I I don't know. The squad has grown. Okay. They've multiplied in number. And AIPAC, the American Israeli political action committee is saying, we wanna get rid of the members of the squad. Now, of course, that's not the best use of their money. Their best use of their money is support Donald Trump, is an amazing friend of Israel, who fought against all this poison, but this is a better use of money than the traditional investments that we've seen from sending money to Harvard, sending money to Yale, sending money to the ADL, sending money to BLM. This is way better than APAC spending $100,000,000 to try to defeat Marjorie Taylor Greene or Lauren Boebert. This is now $100,000,000 that they're spending where AOC is gonna have to defend her turf. Elon Omar is gonna have to defend her turf. So to respond to this now viral tweet that Elon responded to, this person says I'm disinterested in giving the tiniest crap about Western Jewish populations coming to the disturbing realization. Wrong. We wanna win, and you should not say, hey, you're not welcome into the club because you made mistakes prior. I don't wanna be part of that political movement. I think that is callous, that is elitist, that smug. People should always be welcome to admit errors. Always. I think that's a bad attitude across the board. I held some really stupid political positions five years ago. Some people say, you're still not allowed in the club, Charlie, because you said something stupid five years ago. So there's no growth allowed. There's no forgiveness. There's no humility. Honestly, that's an anti Western value. It's an anti Christian value to say that what you said five years ago will always be hung around your neck and you'll never be allowed to grow, to develop, to clarify, to educate yourself. And I think it's actually exciting and showing that AIPAC, which does tilt Democrat, just so we're clear, most of the membership of AIPAC are Democrats. They are investing their resources to try and make it harder for Marxists to win. Is that the best use of their money? No. It is a far better use of money than what we have seen the last twenty or thirty years. It is a positive move in the right direction. So anyway, that's Elon Musk's response. Elon will have to defend himself. Elon is not an anti Semite. What Elon was probably isolating here, as he has clarified in subsequent tweets, is that hey, Jewish populations have been financing a lot of this stuff. It's good that they are waking up. I think it's positive. I think it's exciting, and it gives me hope. More after the break. Email is freedom@CharlieKirk.com. Speaker 11: Do you Speaker 6: know that the average American spends about twenty years in retirement? That's a long time to live without a steady income. And we wanna make sure you enjoy every moment of it and don't outlive your money. Retirement is about more than just investments. It's about living your best life. Let's not retire. Let's pivot. My friends at Pax Financial, who I use for my wealth management future, develop a course for the sole purpose of helping you pivot. If you want your own free guide to pivoting into the new chapter of life with purpose, visit packsfg.com/charlie. I don't think they're investing their money into the new modern day equivalents of hospitals or public parks. Rockefeller, for example, donated millions of acres in Maine and Wyoming, which we now know as the gateway to Yellowstone Park. They literally named the entire highway after it. You know, Carnegie built, you know, not just Carnegie Mellon Carnegie Mellon, but also huge amounts of public infrastructure projects. Talk about how this is a different elite. This is a different mindset. This is a separate psychology than we've seen of the elites a century ago. Speaker 10: That's exactly right, Charlie. The the, you know, the oligarchs so called oligarchs of the early twentieth century are nothing like what we're seeing today. What we see today with the big tech oligarchs is, like, it's got complexes on steroids. They want to control every aspect of your life from what you're eating to what you're seeing. I mean, information, of course, you you know, you talk about it all the time with the censorship and the clampdowns on descent. And as far as loving America, no. These are these are avowed globalists. They're loyal to the World Economic Forum, and Davos just they, you know, they call themselves citizens of the world. That's, know, the abolition of borders and Soros funding all of these migrant groups moving people into The US. He wants to do away with borders. And so, yeah, there's there's a you know, I they don't state that they're not loyal to The United States, but their actions and especially their funding show that they have other loyalties. Speaker 6: Yeah. The this kind of, other loyalties is important, and the god complex is bad. What's even worse than the god complex is wanting to use your kind of wealth and your power to remake the country, not to shore up its defenses. I mean, Henry Ford certainly had some issues. Right? But he poured into the country. He wanted a very strong country. And so where does this come from? Why is it that the new roster of the elites that you detail in your book, Controllogarchs, why do they hate the homeland so much? Where does this come from? Is it because they went to university? I mean, Bill Gates was a dropout. Is it because they were raised in a Silicon Valley finance culture that is more globalist minded? Where does it come from? Speaker 10: Well, let's see. Yes. That's exactly right. I mean, it's the globalist mindset. It's and it's not so it's not necessarily just America. It's more the peasant class. I mean, they have more in common with the elites of China, for example. I go, you know, into great detail about how they really love China, and they love the Chinese system. They love this amalgamation of capitalism and communism. State run capitalism is what they call it in China. Claus Schwab calls it stakeholder capitalism, which I know you've talked about, and it's sort of this esoteric term. But stakeholder capitalism, when you read Claus Schwab's manifestos, the people who don't aren't the stakeholders. He never talks about the people. We the people being stakeholders. It's always business leaders and NGOs and officials from, you know, the government. We don't have a seat at that table. Speaker 6: Yeah. So to kinda build that out further, though, which is there's the World Economic Forum. You have Klaus Schwab on the front page of your book. Everyone is driven by something different. I I I don't know if you agree with this. Do you think that Soros has a different agenda than Zuckerberg? I do. Zuckerberg seems like a guy who wants to end the game with the most tokens. Soros is a guy that wants to destroy the game. Would you agree with that? Speaker 10: Yeah. But they they I do I do agree with that. I mean, they're all they're all have different motivations to a degree, but they also have a lot of the same motivations in that they want to control, you know, every facet of life. I, you know, see it time and again both with Soros and with Zuckerberg. So, yes, they're they have different opinions. They're different people. Speaker 6: Yeah. I mean, I I just I I think that Soros is far more sinister and kinda say Machiavellian. Zuckerberg, I think, is malleable. I mean, based on all public accounts, people that have known Zuckerberg, he's used to be kind of this free speech liberal, almost libertarian, but I think he's a coward. I think that external forces have been able to shape shift Zuckerberg. I think he wants to be liked. I think he wants to have his empire. He wants to be reasonable. Soros is a legit ideologue. We we have no evidence that Zuckerberg in his private musings is all about, you know, western transformation. Right? Now he might be doing that, but as far as his intention, I'm not so sure. Speaker 1: Charlie Kirk Speaker 6: Okay, everybody. Hillsdale College. I'm wearing my Hillsdale tie today. With America's college and universities so morally corrupt, they're less concerned with critical thinking than with indoctrination. I'm happy to report there is a college where students debate ideas openly and honestly. It's my favorite college, Hillsdale College. You can learn more at charlieforhillsdale.com. As stated in Hillsdale's founding document in 1844, Hillsdale's original mission was to offer the serious kind of liberal arts education needed to preserve the blessings of civil and religious liberty across the land. Look, if you go to charlieforhillsdale.com, you'll find a short video. It's over a minute long showing how Hillsdale's work, not only on its Michigan and Washington DC campuses, but across the nation is effective in defending American liberty. Their online courses are excellent. You've got to check it out right now. Go to charlie4hillsdale.com. That is charlief0rhillsdale.com. As stated in the Hillsdale online documents, you've got to check it out. Charlie for hillsdale dot com. You could take the Victor Davis Hanson American citizenship class, the American history class, of course, on Aristotle, Winston Churchill, mathematics, Euclidean geometry, Genesis, Exodus. Do you want to learn? Charlieforhillsdale.com is the place to start. They do a wonderful job, and they are America's greatest college by far. So check it out. Charlieforhillsdale.com. Okay. So some of you might say, but Charlie, is there really a war on white people? Yeah. Let's put aside all of the obvious anti white violence we've seen in high schools, the white kid getting killed. You know, let's put all that aside, which which is clear. Let's put aside the University of Chicago course, the course at Yale, all that stuff. This is an amazing example of what we're talking about. Now, to be very accurate, you can't say that, you know, liberal Jews are funding this. Okay? What we're getting at, though, is that this example is one of hundreds of thousands that should really make you think deeply about what is happening in American education. It is fashionable. It is popular. It is in vogue to hate white people. I'm going to prove it to you. There's a new series of videos over the last couple of weeks that I've seen of students that record on Zoom high school debate competitions. Now, to be clear, high school debate is not what it used to be. It doesn't teach rhetoric. It doesn't teach persuasion. It doesn't teach public speaking. It doesn't encourage an authentic understanding of a topic. High school debate has become spewing of left wing talking points and they become winners. Now, recent weeks, high school students in debate again have been recording these debates on Zoom and have been putting them on the Internet to say, hey, look what passes as debate now. Look what passes as a popular argument or a what's considered to be a winning argument. So, oh, is this a guy that does this incubate debate James Fishback? I I guess he's the one that's tweeting this stuff out. It's very interesting. I I I wasn't aware of that. So I want you to listen very carefully. This here is a high school debate team that won the debate. I want you to count how many times they say the word white. This is what is considered to be a good argument. They ignored the prompt and resorted to shamelessly attacking white people, not once, not twice, but with zero depth whatsoever, blaming white people for all the problems. Listen carefully. This is what is considered to be a winning debate team in America today. Play cut one thirteen and listen carefully. Speaker 12: We demand that white Christians be held accountable for America's original sin. The negative continues the trend in politics while whiteness devours the other. Debating this topic is irrelevant while society is dominated by white Christians. Even if we have something educational to say about this topic, the political will just pray it away and continue their mission to conquer the world in the name of Jesus Christ. The military industrial complex has been coupled with American Christianity, the worship of the weapons of whiteness. United States was built to be a city upon a hill for white Christians. American Christianity has controlled all aspects of politics such as justifying slavery. We solved by decoupling weapons and worships and ending the crusade. White Christians literally inscribe scriptures onto their weapons, worshiping through war. We want to repent for our sins and show America's failure. By voting for us, the judge will send his signal to political leaders and condemn Christian in politics. Speaker 13: That ends up being a two one for Livingston. The affirmative tells me in summary and final focus that the role of the ballot for me is to reject Christian militarism. So at the end of the day, I'm left with deciding which side I think is better doing a better job rejecting Christian militarism. Speaker 6: That is considered to be a winning debate. They ignored the prompt and they just said, yeah, it's all about Christian militant militarism and white Christianity. That's considered to be deep. And they won. They won the debate. Where does that come from exactly? It goes down the tributary. It starts at Harvard. It starts at Yale. It starts at Dartmouth. And then it goes down. They create the teaching standards. They create the curriculum. And what many Jews are texting me to their great credit, They're saying, oh my gosh. High school debate will soon say this. They'll soon read a prompt. And it's the Jews' fault. They're an inch away from saying that. This close. And what Candace was saying and what Tucker was saying and what Elon is saying is that that clip I just played until recently did not bother most liberal Jews. And that's frustrating. Now it does bother a lot of liberal Jewish donors. Dots are starting to be connected. They're like, Oh, wait. All the toxicity and venom and hatred that we turned a blind eye to or we might have been cool with against white people is now being directed to us. So in that high school debate clip, you saw these kids reading a prompt, right? Reading a prompt, and they say, you know, white people are to blame for this. It doesn't take a massive leap to turn that high school debate kid to plug and replace, to copy paste white people out, Jewish in. That's where this comes from, guys. We've said this for the last couple weeks. Why is it that so many young people are on board for the Palestinian liberation thing or Gaza? Why are so many young people praising Osama bin Laden right now? It's a big thing right now on TikTok. Huge. Osama bin Laden is being praised by Generation Z because you've taught them to hate America, to hate white people, and then eventually hate Jews. And Hamas sympathizers are literally BLM two point o. You guys remember this. Here's cut one fourteen. White people begging for forgiveness from black people. This is during Floyd a Palooza. Play cut one fourteen. Okay. That's some sick stuff. Speaker 7: By the Speaker 6: way, it's sick on two sides. It's sick for the white people doing it and sick for the black people that are allowing it to happen. Like, some black guys should be like, this is insane. Get up. Enough. We're gonna take responsibility for our own problems. Get off your knees. Stop asking are you a you should have been are you KKK? Are you racist? Then stop apologizing. Enough. Stop pandering to us. You got that black woman crying. Oh my gosh. I've been waiting for this my whole life. I can get a job. Give me a break. The white hate gets turned into white guilt in the heads of weak minded people who then fall for the rhetoric. So where what does all this tie together, everybody? You are living through without a doubt one of the most heated, consequential, high stakes realignments in the history of the digital narrative war. I know that some of you might not see it, you might not be looking at it. If you are not actively on social media, you might not be watching it. I'm telling you, you are living through a TikTok, Twitter, Instagram. I have never seen sea changes like this ever. And we are flirting with some really dangerous stuff. Very dangerous stuff. There's some exciting stuff happen of people waking up and enlightenments and awakening and the rising of the frequencies. Producer Andrew said this morning, I have never seen so many people wake up so quickly. That is true. Simultaneously, I have not seen so much garbage, venom, crap spread so quickly in the history of the digital narrative war. Remember, Twitter is the incubator of elite opinion, but TikTok is the incubator of idiocy for generation Z. Let me say that again. Twitter is the incubator for elite thought. TikTok is the incubator of idiocy for Generation Z. They might say, but Charlie, let's compete on TikTok. We try. We have our, you know, I resisted as long as I could. They censor us. They ban us. They suppress us. TikTok, which is a Chinese Communist Party asset funded by the Chinese Communist Party, they elevate content that weakens America, weakens Western society. They will give priority to trans content. They give priority to gay content. They give priority to left wing politics, and they deemphasize pages that would talk about masculinity, borders, free speech, or conservative values. Chinese TikTok is all about solving math problems and games and being healthy and having big families. American TikTok is about cutting off your genitals, taking Lupron, and supporting Hamas. So what I'm getting at here, the macro, because some of you might say, but Charlie, how do all these different dots connect? You are living through right now one of the greatest changes of how people view the world in my life by far in my lifetime. I've not seen anything like it. COVID was close, but the difference with COVID is that almost all the means of communication were suppressed. We couldn't speak openly on Twitter during COVID. We kept on losing access to our Twitter account. We now have Twitter, so the truth can get out. We're like, wow. Could you if we had axe this is a this is the truth. If we had access to Twitter and Elon owned Twitter during COVID, I think hundreds of thousands of lives would have been saved. We got suppressed on ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, vitamin D, monoclonal antibodies. Imagine how many lives could have been saved if we had Twitter during COVID. It's a big deal. At the same time, we for every action there's equal and opposite reaction, we have Twitter and then we have TikTok, which is just this Wuhan laboratory of anti West hatred that Gen Z is just getting. It's pumping in. By the way, I've been completely unsuccessful. I tell parents, why do you give yourself your kids phones? Honestly, because parents don't want a parent anymore. That's why. They give their kid a digital pacifier so they can go back to wine and their kid can just stare at the screen all day long. Like, I don't know why my kid is depressed. Yeah. Go look at your kid's screen time. Okay? Eight and a half hours staring at TikTok. Yeah. I mean, don't be surprised when their suicidal ideation goes up. It's just so weird. Why do some of these kids depressed and anxious? Because they're staring at their screen all day long. Go be a parent. Go stare at a tree. Go fish. Go for a run. There's a life outside of watching a bunch of trannies dancing in favor of Hamas. Relieffactor.com, 100 drug free relief factor, knee pain, back pain, joint pain, double pain. Check it out right now at relieffactor.com. The 100% drug free Relief Factor could be the best solution for you. Leah was sitting on her couch in so much pain. She was literally in tears. You've got to check it out. She says, I'm so I'm truly amazed at this product. If you're living with aches and pains, see how Relief Factor, a daily drug free supplement could help you feel better and live longer. You're gonna get started. Try this Relief Factor three week quick start. It's only $19.95 and comes with feel better, your money back guarantee. Visit relieffactor.com. That's relieffactor.com. $1,800 for relief. That's $1,800 for relief. They're amazing. So check it out right now. Relieffactor.com. So please check it out right now. Relieffactor.com. One Sunday, Leah was sitting on her couch. She was in pain and got out of pain. Relieffactor.com. $1,800 for relief. Feel better and money back guarantee only $19.95. That is relieffactor.com relieffactor.com. Email us freedom@charliekirk.com and subscribe to our podcast. You are living through a digital realignment, a narrative war that is changing in real time. It's exciting and also scary simultaneously. We'll be right back. Because colleges and universities today are less concerned with critical thinking than with indoctrination. It is no wonder why so many young Americans embrace cancel culture, deny free speech to conservatives, and even celebrate terrorism. There is one college where students debate ideas openly and honestly, where they pursue truth together with their professors, and where America's great heritage of liberty is studied and revered. My favorite college, Hillsdale College. As stated in Hillsdale's founding document in 1844, Hillsdale's original mission was to offer the kind of serious liberal arts education needed to preserve the blessings of civil and religious liberty across the land, and this mission continues to guide Hillsdale College today. You can learn more at my favorite college's website, charlieforhillsdale.com. There, you will find a short video. It's just over a minute long showing how Hillsdale's work, not only on its Michigan campus, not only in Washington DC campus, but across the nation is effective in defending American liberty. Take some time to watch today at charlieforhillsdale.com. You are you're kind of super well built and trimmed. I think that's a good use of money. What's not a good use of money is his taxpayer funded electric vehicle ambitions. Tell us about it. Speaker 10: Yeah. That's right. And just going back to what you were saying a moment ago about Zuckerberg versus Doros, I think Bezos is a lot closer to Zuckerberg. Like you say, I mean, he had this sort of almost libertarian bent in the nineties, and it's sort turned into more I mean, he's very quiet. You don't hear much from him except when you see him doing these photoshoots. But it's yeah. But the with the electric vehicle, I mean, everyone knows about Amazon and Alexa. They're always listening to you. But what most people don't know is that they're actually trying to figure out what you're thinking. And and Amazon Web Services is, you know, a huge AI Speaker 1: Where tyranny dies and wisdom lives. The Charlie Kirk Show. Speaker 6: Somebody asked me the other day, how are you able to keep going on with this? Preserving liberty means more to me than anything else. You see, we're in a very important time in our nation's history. You look around in this room. Don't give me this nonsense that Americans are giving up. That is not true. Amfest.com. Amfest.com. Check it out. Phoenix, Arizona. It's gonna be the largest event we've ever held, god willing. Wait till you see the speakers we're announcing tomorrow. So get your tickets today while they're still there. Amfest.com. K. Welcome back. I I wanna just keep on encouraging APAC. I'm glad that they're deploying those resources in that way. It's not the best, but it's better, and that deserves encouragement and praise. God bless them. Candace Owens mentioned this, and we have Candace Owens coming up next hour. By the way, Candace was trending on Twitter all over the place, and people were so unfair to Candace Owens. I have her back a 100%. People say, oh, she's an anti Semite. I said, really? Candace Owens who dropped everything. I was in Jerusalem. It's a true story. I called Candace. I said, Candace, we have an extra ticket if you want it to go to the embassy opening when Trump moves the embassy. And she says, oh my goodness. She drops everything, eighteen hour flight, brutal connection through Europe, two red eye flights to get all the way to Israel for the embassy opening with Donald Trump. We saw where Jesus healed the sick. We went to the city of David. We saw the old city, and she loved it. So it's just these people, it's just so shallow, so sloppy. I don't like it at all. We'll talk more about that next hour. But Candace said this and she's and this is a vibe that is out there. And I don't think some of the pro Israel pro Israel advocates are listening when we say this. I'm gonna I'm gonna I'm in a separate category. I I have some bitterness that I've expressed on the show, which is the way that I've been talked about and treated has really bothers me, to be honest, because of how much prohazard advocacy I've done and do, but I'm a put put me aside. Okay? There is a Jonathan Greenblatt who runs the ADL. The ADL is an awful organization. He goes on television and he's saying this quote, Administrators are going to find their backbone if we hold them accountable. This is about the anti Jew hatred on campus. And by the way, he's correct in saying this to be perfectly fair. Donors need to hold them accountable. Students need to hold them accountable. Then he says the federal government needs to have them accountable. I don't really know what that means. Okay? But Jonathan Greenblatt, the reason why Candace said what she said on Tucker and the reason why the vibe on the right is off on this is we're like, really? Where were all of you guys the last couple of years? I thought hatred to one group is hatred to everybody. That's literally in the ADL ad. In the ADL ad is that all hate oh, I guess all hate is bad unless it's hatred of Asians and hatred of whites. Play cut 56. Speaker 14: The question I was gonna ask you, which we have now seen at least the beginning of some pushback finally from people who run these schools. You mentioned Columbia, other places. Do you see the leadership at some of these schools that you've been pushing so hard? Are they now finding the backbone you just described? Speaker 15: Well well, they're only gonna find the backbone if we hold them accountable. Donors need to hold them accountable. Students need to hold them accountable, and the federal government does too. And let me tell you, the university presidents, they might not listen to some students, but when they run the risk of losing hundreds of millions of dollars in federal grants, they're going to respond. Speaker 6: So there's a ADL is comprised of left wing, sometimes secular Jews. There's a major upheaval that's probably going to happen in the ADL sometime soon. Now why is it that the ADL receives such focus from Elon Musk and from us? It's not just that they're liberal. It's that the ADL goes out of their way to try and debank you. The ADL goes out of their way to try to pull advertisers from your show or from Twitter. The ADL, as he says accountability by the way, I think you should finally do that. By the way, if the ADL finally waves the sword towards colleges, I will be an enthusiastic supporter, but I don't buy it. If the ADL will be nearly as harsh to Harvard as they have been to Elon, God bless them. But they won't. They're gonna treat Harvard and Princeton and Yale with kid gloves, Cause the ADL are first liberals and then they're Jews. That's and you know who said that? Dennis Prager. So don't call me an anti Semite. Their liberalism is more important than their Judaism. It's always been that way. And they've been captured by a lot of secular Jews. So the question is, will the ADL be as ferocious, intense, nasty to Princeton, Yale, Dartmouth and Stanford as they have been to Twitter, to Jack Posobic, to Bannon? Probably not. You know, Greenblatt says, yeah, you know, we need some accountability. Really? Greenblatt, why don't you we know the answer because liberalism is very important to him, and Harvard is the holy cathedral of American left wing liberalism. Okay? Harvard is the Vatican of American leftism. It's just where they it's where the the catechism of the left is published in Harvard. So when he says accountability, why doesn't Harvard say, we're gonna defund you. We're gonna burn you to the ground because he doesn't he doesn't mean it. Okay. More coming up next hour. Email us freedom@charliekirk.com and subscribe to our podcast. Did you know that there is one phase of sleep that almost everyone fails to get enough of? And this one phase of sleep is responsible for most of your body's daily rejuvenation, repair, controlling hunger and weight loss hormones, boosting energy, and so much more. I'm talking about deep sleep. And if you don't get enough, you'll probably struggle with cravings, slow metabolism, premature aging, or even worse conditions. Why don't most people get enough of this one most important phase of sleep? A big reason is magnesium deficiency because over eighty percent of the population is deficient in magnesium. And magnesium increases GABA, which encourages relaxation on a cellular level, which is critical for sleep. Magnesium also plays a key role in regulating your body's stress response system. Those with magnesium deficiency usually have higher stress levels, which negatively impact sleep as well. Now before you go out, buy a magnesium supplement. It's important to understand that most products out there only have one or two forms of magnesium when the reality is your body needs all seven forms of this natural sleep mineral. That's why I Magnesium breakthrough contains all seven forms of magnesium designed to help calm your mind and you fall asleep, stay asleep, and wake up refreshed. The deep sleep benefits are really noticeable. Visit magnesiumbreakthrough.com/charlie and enter code Charlie 10 for 10% off any order. The special offer is only available at magnesiumbreakthrough.com/charlie. Speaker 10: Cloud contract type deal from the Pentagon. All of the big tech agencies are hosting their operations on Amazon Web Services. That's kind of a thing that goes really unnoticed. I mean, you see when you're watching an NFL game that Amazon's got the great stats, and I do enjoy seeing those stats that are you know, from AI that they're giving you. But think about all of that technology. They boast of it in the commercials being used against you. I mean, it's a pretty terrifying prospect. So I would say that Bezos amongst the people on the cover I mean, you're certainly right. George Soros is a total ideologue and and, you know, more terrifying in a lot of ways than what he's trying to fund with the chaos and the total destruction of The United States. You don't see Bezos totally funding that, but he's funding the climate change ambition, the so called climate change ambitions that are really all about control from the vehicles to the smart homes. I mean, there's some examples in the book of smart thermostats. If you got a smart thermostat, imagine going home in the middle of the summer, going to bed and waking up drenched in sweat because the utility companies have decided they're gonna use your smart thermostat to keep the temperature high in the middle of the summer. It's happened in Texas. It happened in Colorado. You see Gavin Newsom in California telling people that their, you know, their temperatures of their homes need to stay up at 80 degrees when it's in a heat wave. I mean, it's just crazy. And Jeff Bezos is making the tech that allows you to do that. Speaker 6: The book is Controllogarcs. We will be right back after the break. Seamus Seamus, stay right there. Email us freedom@charliekirk.com and subscribe to our podcast. We'll be right back. The book is Controllogarcs. Seamus Brunner continues with us. So, Seamus, let me ask you about this one, weaponizing artificial intelligence. Controllogarchs are rapidly ratcheting up AI to extinguish what remains of a free market and push Americans into Marxism. This is a very deep topic. I've always been I'm I'm worried currently that AI is going to be used as a tool to create a tyrannical society even worse than what we have. Your thoughts? Speaker 10: You're exactly right to be worried, and it's happening right now. The intelligence agencies, they're using AI. They're gonna use the tech companies to do it. You look at the biggest company, ChatGPT. I mean, regarding the of all you know, getting rid of the free market. Look at the largest company behind ChatGPT, OpenAI. There's a reason that OpenAI is funding universal basic income studies. And it's I mean, they you know, there's other experts, World Economic Forum experts who say that AI is going to eliminate 40% of the jobs. Either you're gonna have to adapt or you're gonna be out of work. And, you know, I think the ultimate goal here, they sort of state it when they say you will own nothing and be happy in Davos, is sort of a peasant class living in high rise buildings and ultra low emission zones with no cars eating the bugs, and that's what AI is going to allow. Speaker 6: In your research, how then do we best counter the the looming AI threat from these contrologarchs? Speaker 10: Well, the first step is you gotta be aware of this, and you gotta be aware of their blueprint. I mean, sunlight is the best disinfectant. Something that gives me hope in all of this is that keep more and more people are craving authenticity. As you see these AI thing, I mean, it's really cool that some of the videos you'll see online of what people are able to do with AI and making videos that look super real, but aren't. But then you see you can get down into the comment sections, and you see more and more people saying this is gross. This is creepy. It's the same thing with the fake foods. Something that gives me hope is, you know, they're not extremely popular, which is why they have to ban cows, and Ireland is headed towards slaughtering the cows. So as more more people become aware of what's going on, spread the word, shine the disinfecting light of sunlight on these agendas, that does give me hope. And, you know, nobody's gonna wanna live in a pod eating bugs. The question is once you're out of work and given a meager basic income of $30,000, are you going to be able to do anything about it? And that's why we need to act right now. Speaker 6: So your book Controllogarcs, set quote, rips back the curtain on never before published revelations. What are some of the craziest and most important revelations that our audience would not have heard before? Speaker 10: Well, I just published a piece on Breitbart today. It it might be the way he's lead story still, and this is about the the control guards profiting from abortion. I mean, right now, the supreme court is weighing whether or not to invalidate the FDA approval of a drug called mifepristone. It's also known as r u four eight six. And this is I mean, this thing is really a a sickening drug, and it shocked me when I found out that it's the most common method of abortion. Now you don't have to be pro life to find it sort of grotesque that people like George Soros and Warren Buffett are profiting and and setting up secret shell companies in the Cayman Islands in order to receive profits from chemical induced abortions. So that that drug, Texas was the great state of Texas was the one to sue the FDA last November saying that the Clinton era approval of this drug was totally crooked. And in the book, I actually document how just how crooked this was. It was the Rockefeller Foundation in partnership with a few other contrologarchs who brought this drug from a German company whose roots were in Nazi Germany. IG Farben's successor entity is called Huxde G. Huckst developed this drug that kills infants en masse or kills the new, I guess, fetuses en masse. And, you know, the you use tax exempt resources. This is what the Rockefeller Foundation does. They use tax exempt resources in partnerships with the government and the Clinton administration to bring this drug to market. Now it turns out that this is actually one of the most painful ways of having an abortion for a woman. And then you've got billionaires profiting from it. So I thought that was pretty pretty grotesque. You know, the a lot of the world economic forum stuff has been talked about. Yuval Noah Harari. I know you've talked about him a lot on the show. But just some of the some of the things that they are pouring billions of dollars into, whether the AI and the Neuralink type companies, microchips, brain microchips, with the test subjects being animals for now. I mean, actually, FDA just approved Neuralink for human trials. I thought this was all conspiracy theory stuff, microchips in brains. It's real. It's happening. Over 10,000 people have received microchips in their brains to ostensibly the the thin edge of the wedge is, to cure paralysis. But, of course, in the hype videos, it's like psychic text messaging and ultimately, like, VR porn, I guess, beamed directly into your brain stem. That kind of was shocking. And, it sounds like conspiracy theory stuff, but just go look at the videos on their websites. I mean, this is what they're trying to bring about. I mean, the founder of the Oculus Rift, is trying to make nerve implants to make VR porn more realistic. Zuckerberg has got patents, and patents is a huge theme in the book. I mean, that's what it's all about is patents equal profit. Zuckerberg's patenting things like Nu Skin and haptic suits so that when you're living in a virtual world, can you know, it's like Ready Player One type stuff. So it used to be dystopian future science fiction. It's all here. It's all now, and it's pretty shocking stuff. Speaker 6: So to reemphasize the abortion pill. Welcome back, everybody. Email us freedom@freedomcharleykirk.com and subscribe to our podcast. Joining us now is one of my favorite guests, Heather McDonald. Heather, welcome back to the program. I want everyone to check out When Race Trumps Merit. So Heather, there's been several stories. Haley Biden carjacked in DC, eight teenagers charged with murder in Las Vegas of a young white man, San Francisco that's cleaning up all the streets for Xi, which is a separate issue in some way, but we see we see all these different stories and we're getting more and more emails. Do you think that white America is starting to wake up, that there is a multidimensional, multi institutional war against white people in this country? Speaker 16: Well, we haven't figured out a language yet to really talk about it, Charlie, that will be acceptable to even many conservative ears. But I certainly hear that from students. I was at the University of Virginia last week, and a young student that I was speaking with said that there is a growing awareness among young people, especially for white males, that they are absolutely pariahs in our society. They are going to be the last admitted to schools, excuse me, the last fired, the first fired. And so it is a reality, and it is a reality that is absolutely denied by the entirety of of our mainstream society and by many conservatives. But we need to keep pointing this out because there is no grounds whatsoever for European the inheritors of European civilization to cancel it. Now those inheritors may be people of all different colors, but the the people that are under attack are the Caucasian inheritors of that civilization. And at this point in world history, we have nothing to apologize for because any violations of human rights, and human rights is, of course, exclusively a European Western concept, violations of those rights, whether it's American slavery or imperial atrocities, pale in comparison to every other civilization's ongoing atrocities and violence. Speaker 6: So Heather, I mean, another example, at Louisiana Tech, a black student stabbing for white women is just another story that has happened. I do think that there is a greater and greater understanding and agreement that the laws, the enforcement laws, the lack of media coverage, it's almost fashionable to hate white people. Now, I guess the next question is, Heather, what next? Would it be helpful for, you know, white people or white America to recognize and realize this and talk about this more? Because anytime we notice it, it's the amazing phrase from Michael Anton. It's not happening, but it's good that it is. Like, we're not allowed to even notice it. Your thoughts, Heather McDonald. Speaker 16: It's not just fashionable to hate white people. It's presidential. You know, we have a president now who goes around at every opportunity, staying the preposterous lie that white supremacy is the biggest threat in this country. And and let's just let's just get the facts out there, Charlie, yet again because this is so completely denied by the media that amplifies the Biden message of white supremacy. If you look at all interracial violence between blacks and whites and whites and blacks, blacks commit 87% of all interracial attacks between blacks and whites and whites and blacks. A black is 35 times more likely to commit an act of violence against a white person than vice versa. And we see it, you know, the the few times when you get the videos and you get either the names that reveal that it's a black perpetrator because of the pseudo Africanist names. We see this happening, and yet we're in an absolute state of denial. So what it's gonna take, what sort of politician or leader to articulate that reality, it it remains a a very, very touchy thing. I mean, I can feel it when I go on, you know, what is, for us, the mainstream media, which is Fox News. If you use white in any other context than one of opprobrium, you really are asking to be called a racist by fellow conservatives. And that is preposterous because to say that whites are under attack is not to attack blacks per se. It is to notice the facts, the averages. Of course, there are millions of blacks who are law abiding, who don't want to be treated as perpetual victims and wards of the state. But on average, there is a pathological inner city culture that is creating dysfunction. You have now what's going on, a race hustle on the part of too many Black leaders where they can simply play upon white guilt and claim that it is an accomplishment in itself to be Black. You have the possibility now of specializing in being black just as I could specialize in being female, or gays can specialize in being gay. And that's the one accomplishment that nobody can compete with you And and and it gives you enormous power over the absolute pariahs of straight white males. Speaker 6: And yet we're told that racism is the biggest problem. What what could actually break the matrix, and I don't know if you agree, Heather, I think that it's probably fifty fifty. I don't think every black believes that racism is the biggest problem. I think some have convinced themselves of that, but I think deep down a lot of great Black Americans, they know that there are other problems. Like you said, the pathologies that are put into their culture, right? What is considered to be acceptable? Not staying with the women that you impregnate, so on and so forth. Instead of telling black Americans that they could be great by doing great noble things, we have this self esteem cult of like black girl magic. You're magical because of whatever. It's toxic. And of course, there are tons of problems in urban America and it continues, to this day. Let's just play this this this tape that just went viral here. Play 71. But of course, racism is the problem. Play cut 71. Speaker 10: On my butter. We do it. Don't play my slide on post play. It will get like that. No. No. No. No. Switches right here. And I picked up That's just enough right there. That's enough. +1, 23. That's enough. Yeah. Speaker 6: It's I don't know if you saw that video, Heather. It's such a mystery why there are so many murders in the inner city. So Heather, go through the numbers because I think what percentage of murders are committed by black men in the country? You know, crime, is it is it proportional to their population? Speaker 16: Oh, no. It's it's vastly disproportional. Blacks commit about 66% of all violent crime in the country, at least in the 75 largest counties, which is where most of the population resides. Though they're 15% of the population in those 75 largest counties, they commit well over half of all murders. It's it's so disproportionate. It's far more disproportionate than their number in the prison population where they're a third of the prison population. In fact, studies have shown that blacks are less likely to be convicted of felonies, whether because prosecutors just aren't coming down as hard or they've got sympathetic juries. But at at a third of the prison population, that's actually much less than you would expect from blacks involvement in violent crime. But that video is absolutely classic, Charlie. We've seen those videos. The police see those videos all the time. You know, we're supposed to believe that that the problem with these black kids is that they're too poor. They don't have any opportunities as the mayor of Chicago, Brandon Johnson, has said to to justify the the flash mobs, marauding magnificent mile beating up on white tourists. The fact of the matter is blacks are posting inner city kids post videos like that from their smartphones all the time showing off their showing off their money. The social media is the police's best friend because it helps them solve these gang ties. Any kid that has a smartphone is not economically deprived. That kid is richer in resources than than Louis the fourteenth ever was. But we have Speaker 6: That turned is our such a good point. That is so correct. Yes. That's a great point. Speaker 16: Turn our eyes to see because we can't look at it any longer. In the nineties, we were talking about rap music. We were talking about the cop hatred, the misogyny, the homophobia. We were disturbed by it. Now we don't even talk about it. We simply blame ourselves and and feel like it is somehow a violation of racial etiquette to mention these pathologies. And there's pathologies in the white underclass as well. Let's be perfectly clear. But this Charlie, it is so urgent for whites to stop caving into the race hustle because whites Speaker 6: Okay. I think we need to fix Heather's connection. I I wish we could have finished that sentence. We'll fix that connection in a second. Ruff Greens and by the way, let's just summarize it. This is this is so simple. Get married, get a job, graduate high school, don't commit crimes. Period. Ruffgreens.com. You've heard me talk about Ruff Greens and how it's helping dogs. You gotta check out dog food is dead food. Ruff Greens has essential vitamins and minerals, omega oils, digestive enzymes, probiotics, and plenty of antioxidants. Get your free jump start trial bag. All you have to do is cover the shipping. Check it out right now. Roughgreens.com/kirk. That is ruffgreens.com/kirk. You don't have to change your dog's food. Just add a small scoop of rough greens every single day. Has omega oils, digestive enzymes, probiotics. It's incredible. If you have a dog, you've got to check out ruffgreens.com/kirk. That is ruffgreens.com/kirk. Ruffgreens.com/kirk. Check it out right now. Ruffgreens.com/kirk. Heather McDonald continues after the break. She's amazing. Check out her book. It's very, very important. When race trumps merit. More after the break. People ask me everywhere I travel about StrongCell. Charlie, is StrongCell legit? Charlie, do you really believe in the antiaging properties of NADH? Charlie, is this product worth the price? My answer is the same to all of their questions. Yes, yes, and yes. I'm a huge believer in this approach to health and wellness. StrongCell is a scientific breakthrough in cellular health replenishment that combines NADH, co q ten, and marine collagen to boost your body's cellular function. I personally take strong cell every day, and so do a ton of our Kirk listeners. Go see the reviews for yourself. If you are someone who relies on caffeine or sugar just to keep yourself going, then you have to give StrongCell a try. I only have one important request of you. I recommend this life changing product, but you have to give it at least four weeks to realize the best results. It takes a little time to reengineer your body's NADH. Think about it. It's been on the decline for quite a while, and in some cases, for decades. First step, go to strongcell.com/charlie today. That's strongsell.com/charlie and read the personal testimonials for yourself. Then use promo code Charlie to get a special 20% discount on your order. Again, that's strongsell.com/charlie, and don't forget your 20% discount by using promo code Charlie at checkout. Covered a lot. Zuckerberg, Bezos not as much. Who remember, he owns the Washington Post and his ex wife, Mackenzie, like you said, she's worth $35,000,000,000 and she's just spending money like it's going out of style on left wing politics. And then you have Soros. Soros out of the five out of the six no. Out of the five. Out of the five is the most notorious to try to reshape western society. What do what have you discovered about George Soros that you feel does not get enough attention? Speaker 10: Well, you know, there's a question of whether the George Soros would even laugh, and should he be on the cover, would he be alive? He's 93 years old. And so I wanted to see who the next Soros is, and that's Alexander Soros. Of course, George Soros has multiple children. Each one of them funds radical left wing causes. And, unfortunately, his $25,000,000,000 empire is passed in the hands of Alexander Soros, who is much more radical than he is, his father that is his father. Alex Alex Soros has said he wants to use this $25,000,000,000 empire to fund abortion. And, I mean, it obviously calls it women's rights and reproductive health. They all use sort of these euphemisms for the mass extermination of fetuses. But so and and, of course, elections are you know, if Alex Soros lives to the age of his father, our elections are not safe for the next fifty years. Speaker 6: Yeah. The the entire Soros cabal and cartel Soros cabal and cartel is gonna have billions and billions and billions of dollars. Alexander Source, by the way, is more political than the other. I love this clip here. So here you have Bill Gates who wants to be in charge of your childhood vaccinations, food, and health. Play cut 60. Speaker 17: Out there distributing health advice that have a giant hole in their health game. Speaker 11: Yeah. Absolutely. Speaker 17: Like, Bill Gates is a great example of that. He's got this big fat belly, and he's telling people they have to get vaccinated. Like, this kind of binary thinking, this kind of ridiculous way of looking at the world through only pharmacological interventions, through only medicine, through only this, through only that. There's so many different things that you have to do to be healthy. Speaker 6: Yeah. The the the best part of the tape is actually when Rogan just roasts him for for other, physical attributes. Check out the book Controllogarcs. Seamus will continue, after the breakup. Seamus Brunner continues with us. So, Seamus, what piece of research are here in the book that we didn't talk about? Do you wanna make sure our audience is aware of? Just plug your book, Controllogarcs. Speaker 10: I think my favorite chapter was the dystopian present chapter, and that's the one that's all about Speaker 6: Welcome back, everybody. Email us freedom@charliekirk.com and subscribe to our podcast. Make sure you get involved with Turning Point USA. We're getting we're getting Heather MacDonald back. I wanna play this piece of tape. There's several pieces of tape. Let's play cut one eighteen. This, has gone viral, millions of views of a kid's birthday party, and the kids are celebrating with firearms. I wonder if they're loaded. The parents are on board with this. It is a black culture problem, everybody. You know who the first person to say that is? Brandon Tatum. Candace Owens. It's not racism. It's not white supremacy. I'm sorry. This is a this is a major problem. This is a kid's birthday party of six and seven year olds dancing around with handguns. Play cut one eighteen, please. Yeah. But racism is the problem. Right? White supremacy is the greatest threat to the American homeland. And you know what's really sick? And I don't delight in this. That Is some of those kids are probably gonna get killed in a crossfire. First of all, just that that's again just like rule number one, that's against like every rule of how you handle a firearm. Okay? So that that alone should just bother you. Okay? Secondly, you're letting eight year olds dance around with guns? Spare me the lecture that it's white people's fault. Heather McDonald continues. Heather, sorry for the tech issues. You were finishing I don't know if you remember the thought that you were on, but it was important. Do you wanna just summarize what you're talking about? We can go from there. Speaker 16: Well, yes, there's something that white people can do at this point. We get asked all the time to two on these. Well, what can we do to close the academic skills gap? And I say, the we that you're referring to cannot do anything more. The we that you're has been trying for five cost of trillions of dollars of transfer. Speaker 6: Sorry. Sorry. The the the tech the tech just is not there today. Maybe we'll be able to fix it. What I think Heather was saying is that the we you're referring to have done far enough. I wanna play this piece of tape. I don't know if we have my answer to it, but this is important. Some of the biggest pushers of white supremacy being the problem are white people. It is self loathing. By far, the most pushers are white people. I would say there's plenty Al Sharpton and all of are there, but okay. Well, that's fine. Blake is contributing. I'll I'll read what he has to say in a second. Blake got one nineteen. Speaker 18: You you made a claim that the family is the bedrock of a civilized society or a productive society. How do you define a family? Because in the two hundred fifty thousand years that humans have existed on this planet, the nuclear family where you had where you had a single breadwinner, 2.6 children at a white picket fence is barely a 100 years old. It's a post war phenomena based on on the wealth after World War two. So would you consider a family, a same sex couple, for example, a legitimate family that provides us bedrock for society. And also, you know, we can also remember that interracial families were once illegal as well, you know, so the idea of a family has changed in human history. It used to be extended. Anyway Speaker 6: That's not that's not the tape I wanted, but the the dialogue goes on for him mentioning that blacks are treated terribly later in the discussion in the criminal justice system. And my answer is, stop committing crimes. I think a lot of people are waking up because we the the culture, not us, the culture way overplayed their hand when it came to racism being the problem, white supremacy. And I think when you start to see videos like that kid's birthday party and the graduation of blacks waving around guns, like, yeah, time out. Enough blame, Whitey. In fact, we have one of our most viral clips at NAU where a black student says, well, isn't it white people's fault? Like, why is it white people's fault that black men don't stay with the women that they impregnate? How is that my fault or the white race's fault? How is that white supremacy's fault? The answer and by the way, just so we're clear, 70 plus percent. So ish, depends on what city, but it's right around 75%. So about one in four ish, but we'll round down. 70% of black men abandon the women they impregnate. White people are not to blame for that. Candace Owens joins us next. Speaker 10: Purchases products and sell them to us cheap Chinese goods, just for money and that, you know, all that all of our businesses and the hollowing out of our manufacturing sector, it was all just about money. That's not the case. The people in this book like the Chinese model. They like this state run, capitalism model where, you know, a few select corporations can really make it rich while the rest of the people, if there's any dissent, instantly clamped down on, instantly disappeared. I mean, you see it with the COVID. You saw it with the COVID lockdowns. That was modeled after China's zero COVID policy. And even after China's zero COVID policy was shown to be an absolute failure, I mean, when you saw Shanghai residents locked down for days or weeks at a time, even after the the zero COVID policy was a failure, you still see these guys like Bill Gates advocating for lockdowns. And so the sort of collusion between Bill Gates and Anthony Fauci and both of their favor towards China, that's a huge problem. The social credit score is what I believe the end game is. I think the book shows that they're supporting millions and billions of dollars into digital ID efforts. Just last week, Bill Gates and the United Nations and the Rockefeller Foundation hosted an event called fifty in fifty, how 50 countries within five years are going to be rolling out these digital ID regimes, the central bank digital currencies. You know, these all sound like conspiracy type terms, but I know you know, Charlie, I know your audience is smart. They know that these are full speed ahead. The Atlantic Council also last week said that DBDCs are maintaining momentum, strong momentum through into 2024. The Fed is working on CBDC. The World Bank and the Bank of International Settlements love the idea of a global CBDC. You know, that the CBDC combined with the digital ID, combined with the information control is like game over. Speaker 6: One minute, Seamus. With your research, what is their vulnerability? What is their weak spot? Speaker 10: Well, it's it's We The People. We need to band together. If you're not doing something to counteract this force that is being exerted upon you, you need to, at the very least, spread the word. Our founders were right that, you know, that's why shows like yours are important. Getting the information out there, even, you know, just liking and subscribing and sharing, as dumb as that may sound, really is important and and evangelizing to your relatives and being you know, it's hard if you don't have the facts and you try to go to Thanksgiving dinner and convince your liberal uncle Larry of something, you know, you're not gonna make much headway. You gotta have the facts and the figures, then you'll, you know, talk to him and ask him what he thinks and ask him to explain his position. You'll find nine out of 10 times they really can't. So we do have an advantage with the fact that the truth is on our side. And the one the other thing that I would say we need to do is correct the imbalance. I mean, the left is just like you know, people like George Soros, though it's like an endless ATM for left wing causes, and there are Endless. Great conservative pay Yeah. Speaker 6: Gotta run. Speaker 10: Great conservative donors. We need more. Speaker 6: Seamus Brunner, excellent work. Controllogarchs, thank you so much. Everyone check it out. Joining us now is James Lawrence, attorney for the Legal Defense Fund for Douglas Mackie. James, thank you for taking the time. James, our audience is familiar, with this story and with what's happening, with mister Mackie. Just give us an update. How is Douglas doing personally? Speaker 19: Thanks again, Charlie, for having me on to discuss this case. So to get your audience up to speed, on October 18, the federal district court judge in Brooklyn, New York sentenced mister Mackey to serve seven months in prison for violating federal law under allegedly under 18 USC two forty one. So seven months in prison, which will start in January. So he was ordered to report to prison in January. And then importantly for your audience to know, he asked for the sentence to be stayed pending appeal. So his legal team right now is in the process of appealing the conviction to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals. And so his defense asked for the district court judge to allow the appeal to go forward and for his sentence not to start until all appellate options had been exhausted. The judge denied that request and ordered him to report for the start of his sentence beginning in January. And another point for your audience to be aware of, again, send us on October 18. On October 17 Speaker 1: The voice of generations is the Charlie Kirk Show. Speaker 6: Okay, everybody. Welcome back. Just briefly, Noble Gold Investments. Check it out. I'll tell you more about this later, but Noble Gold is seeing a huge investment of gold buyers from billionaires to multimillionaires to institutional investors. The people who are not afraid are those that invest in gold from Noble Gold Investments. That's noblegoldinvestments.com. Use promo code Charlie to bag a free five ounce America to beat up a coin with each gold or silver IRA. If you qualify, that's noblegoldinvestments.com. Joining us now is the great Candace Owens. Candace is forty weeks pregnant, everybody. So she might have to leave at any moment's notice. Thank you for taking the time. Candace, had a viral interview with Tucker yesterday, but after that or right as the interview was posted, Ben Shapiro tweeted at a Bible verse that you tweeted, which I found to be totally out of line and kind of triggered this massive Internet dispute, and he effectively asked you to resign from the Daily Wire. Candace, what is going on here? Speaker 9: Well, first, I just wanna say that I think people thought it was like all of this was like suspicious timing and that there's no conspiracy theory here. First and foremost, I had signed Donovan Tucker weeks ago. So this interview was already planned. And then obviously, the night before the video of Ben saying some remarks about me went viral. And then minutes before my Tucker interview aired, he did tweet that and I haven't yet gotten any clarity on what the significance of that tweet was. Me posting the Bible passes was just basically me calling for peace and accepting you know, the things that you can't change. And I definitely have had a very peaceful, happy end of pregnancy. And so I didn't and still don't really understand the nature of the tweet, but I did feel compelled in this instance to answer more strongly because it was a biblical passage. And I have said for a very long time that it does feel like Christians are always being told to shut up. And when you share just a biblical passage and it's somehow being construed or being told that there's something wrong with this passage, it was important for me as a Christian to defend our faith. Speaker 6: Yeah. Totally. So this has kind of been simmering for a couple of weeks. So just by background, Ben at a private event spoke to a group of people, and I wanna make sure I'm very clear and specific. He said something on the lines of you have faux sophistication on the matter, Candace. That was his quote. What is he talking about here? I mean, I follow you on social media. I'm a very pro Israel person. Right? I get accused of being a Jewish shill on a daily basis. Like, what what is Ben talking about here? And then secondly, why of all the tweets that he decided to ask you to resign, did he choose a bible verse? Speaker 9: Charlie, you your questions are the same questions that I have. I what what I have said on Tucker and what I will say here is that I think a lot of people who are emotionally involved in the conflict overseas are perceiving people that are actually moderate as radical. And they're not able to see that maintaining a level head is okay. And I think that when they have the benefit of hindsight and it's 2020, they're going to maybe regret some of the things that they've especially amongst their most fervent to to their most fervent allies and supporters, which is why on Tucker, I even brought up the concept of the attacks that have been constant against you. And if it's it's sort of like if you don't veer into radicalism right now, then they take everything. There's an extreme sensitivity there, you know? And every comment that you make, and I can correlate this two weeks ago when I was quite literally, I I sent two tweets back to back about Brian Mast and his comments in in congress being wrong as somebody that is a citizen congressman about saying there's no such thing as innocent civilian life. And then I followed it up by saying, you know, any sort of genocidal language is wrong no matter what government's coming from. I was referring to the American government, And the backlash that I got for saying genocide is always wrong, it's bonkers. I still can't comprehend it. It's such an easy statement for everyone to agree with. Every single person should have said, amen, amen, yes, agree. Genocide is always wrong and unjustifiable. And yet people read in between the lines and said that this must be you're saying this is happening, and it's like, no. But people, that is literally you applying your emotion, and it's utterly illogical. And I think we are living in times right now where it's really scary to see how much emotion people are having, that basic statements. And if I tweeted right now, pedophilia, no matter where it happens in in the world, is always wrong. Is that a statement at certain times okay? Is that statement at certain times not? So I have been trying to understand really what's going on, and the only thing that I can come up with is that people are highly emotional and they're not thinking straight right now. Speaker 6: Yeah. Yeah. That that's that's an eternal statement. Right? It's it's true regardless of what's happening. I I wanna just reinforce this because you bring up a really important point. And for the record, I've always gotten along well with Ben. I've known Jeremy for a long time, but I I call balls and strikes where I see it. And, Candace, I think it's been super unfair the way some people have been treating you and and really unfair because look. I know your heart too. I I tweeted this yesterday. Candace Owens flew eighteen hours through a brutal European connection to go to the embassy opening in Jerusalem, and we toured Israel together. And you you and I were on campuses multiple times together defending Israel and defending the Jewish people. And so I just find a lot of the coverage to be, you know, vitten not a lot, but but some people's chattering has been highly emotional. And so let's just you talked about this in the Tucker interview, Candice. If somebody in the audience is a very pro Israel person, can you bring them up to speed as how their cause is actually weakening by how they are going after allies? And I'm afraid that they are diluting and cheapening the term antisemitism the same way they've done with racism. Speaker 9: There's no question that they've diluted it. People are not even blinking now to be called an antisemite because, you know, when you start with Richard Spencer and you end with Charlie Kirk and you say everybody's an antisemite and everybody's trafficking in antisemitic tropes, you've just lost the plot. I mean, it's in everybody from Joe Rogan to Tucker Carlson last night for God knows what reason being called an anti Semite, and it's it's just completely a losing argument. And so it's funny because I've had some, you know, pro Israel friends that reached out to me and were saying, well, we're just trying to help you. And this time I asserted myself and I said, you need to listen to me. It's obvious to everybody that's looking around right now that there has been a loss in support for Israel, and that's not because any person agrees with what happened on October 7. We have all said on our platforms multiple times that what happened on October 7 is completely abhorrent, but it has a lot to do with the reaction of going after allies for asking questions, for trying to remain not neutral, but humane throughout this and saying that it is always sad. Like people were upset when I said it's always sad when you see a dead child. And some of the upset said, well, can't say that unless you say that also they were just being used as human shields. It's no, you can feel sympathy, you can feel empathy for individuals always, no matter what is going on. You don't need to gauge or jump into a political debate to acknowledge that you're still a human and you have a human response to seeing a dead child. And so what I have said from the very actually, before any of this on my show, is that when you use terms too much and you refer to everybody as something, whether it is a racist, a sexist, a homophobe, you will then find that those words have no power. And I do think that part of the frustration that some people that are parishial are having is trying to understand why this word has no power anymore. And I can explain it over and over, but I can't help people understand it. You saw it happen with Black Lives Matter. First, people were so scared of being called a racist. It was such a horrible smear, horrible libel, like what do I do to not be called that? And then as they started calling everything racist, you started realizing air was racist. And the CNN articles were saying, you know, white people blinking was racist. It became, okay, now we know that this word actually doesn't mean what you're saying, it just means that you want me to submit to whatever it is that you're saying very easily because you've used a smear. You've called me a holocaust snire, you've called me an anti Semite, You've said my silence is violence. And actually what you're trying to do is you're trying to assert control over me while claiming that you are the victim in this. But actually you're trying to assert power over me. And that's not the way to do it. You have to be well intended. And Dennis Prager has always made that point, by the way, for years and years that you have to be very careful when you use a word like that because it will lose power very fast. And unfortunately, his warnings were not heated in this circumstance and people are just don't believe it when you when things people are being called anti Semitic anymore. Speaker 6: Dennis warned us about this. He said an attack used too much loses its power. And you and I both Right. Were kind of we we both still consider Dennis a great friend and a great teacher. And Dennis says he's very careful using that label. He said, because I we want it when we need it, when there's a legit antisemite. And throwing it around as a thought terminating cliche or a means of control or hyper emotional does no one a good service. So so, Candace, let me ask you, because not everyone listens to your show, which is excellent. Everyone should subscribe to her show. There there's a lot of not not a lot. There's a fair amount of rumor or mystery of what you stand on on the war. Can you just the floor is yours. What do you what is your position? Because I think people are completely misinterpreting your views of the Jewish people of what's happening in Israel. Just explain to our audience just to kinda cut off the rumors at the pass. Speaker 9: Yeah. Thank you so much for asking, and and that's what I've said is nobody even asks anymore. And then when you give them an answer and you say, I've said this on my show multiple times, then they say to you, well, I don't listen to your show and, you know, you should tweet it. I'm like, well, my show is posted the full show is posted on Twitter every single day. Oh, well, I don't follow this account. So it becomes not about whether or not what you said or what you didn't say, it becomes about whether or not they were on Twitter at the moment and saw what you said. Otherwise, it doesn't count. You know? And so that's been very interesting. And again, a way to assert power and control and to say that you need to say it when I am online and on whether it's Instagram or Facebook or Twitter. I if I didn't see it, it didn't actually happen, which is completely foolish. But I have not shifted my views at all at at all when it comes to Israel and Palestine, whether it is Ukraine or Russia, whether it is Afghanistan. America has issues at home. We do not need to be sending more money overseas. It is the perspective that is held by Thomas Massey, is now being harassed and being called an anti Semite for his consistent voting against sending any dollar overseas throughout his entire career, right? He has not changed, he has not switched up, so this is not something that is being guided by a hatred or a love of people based on their race at all. It is just my policy, my stance is that America is falling apart. The politicians that are opining on stage and saying, well, we can do both. Look around you, obviously we can't. America is in steep decline educationally, socially, and morally. And I have also been clear that I understand the sentiments coming from white Americans that are saying, why are we suddenly being told now to care about the university debacle? Well, we have been calling this out for years. And Charlie, the you're perfect person to speak about this. You and I have traversed universities. We have been drowned out. We have been harassed. We have been chased out of restaurants for our ideas That's correct. As conservatives, and nobody cared. We couldn't get people to stop funding these universities. We could not get people to understand how bad the problem had become when you actually had professors, forget the students that were protesting, you had professors that were tweeting, all I want for Christmas is a white genocide. I believe that was at Drexel University in Pennsylvania, and that faculty member was protected, calling openly for genocide of white people. So it is a fair question. It is a fair critique when people say, why are you telling us this is a problem now? And this has a problem that many of us have been fighting for the last decade, and it seemed like nobody cared. And so by being fair in that assessment, by recognizing what white people have gone through in this country, by recognizing this, what I consider myself to be America first stances of the problems that are happening in this country, And by saying that I do not want to be involved in another Middle Eastern conflict, no matter where the stage is. People hear that in this moment as some form of antisemitism. It's not. It's consistency. It is the reason that I quoted Thomas Sowell on last night's episode that he has a quote about the civil rights era. He's referring to black America in this quote, but saying, when people are used to special treatment, sometimes being treated the same can feel like discrimination. And it's not discrimination to say that the obvious truths that we are facing in this nation. You can debate that academically, but don't be disingenuous and call people anti Semites for holding the same decisions that they have always held for the last decade. Speaker 6: Yeah. Your position has large agreement in many political circles. By the way, it's also held by people from Thomas Massey to Dennis Kucinich to Rand Paul to a certain extent. And you can have dis disagreements without having to throw around some of those vile labels imaginable. Candace, we're gonna continue after the break. Subscribe to the Candace Owens podcast. Candace is special. We have her back a 100%. And let's just take a pause. What's really going on here? That's what we're gonna talk about after the break. Email is freedom@CharlieKirk.com. Speaker 19: My wife gave birth to the couple's first child, and Doug couldn't be there, Charlie. He was not present at the birth of his first child because he he was in Federal District Court the following day in New York City awaiting awaiting sentencing. It's just another aspect of this case that's heart wrenching and troubling on every level. We've talked about it previously. The First Amendment problem. The Fifth Amendment problem, and with respect to the conduct of the trial itself, the Sixth Amendment problem. And then you compound all of those constitutional issues, which are profound and downright disturbing, and add on top of that the personal impact of missing the birth of your firstborn child and compounded with, hey. You're gonna have to report to prison in January. So that's the latest. Speaker 6: So in in American history, James, has someone been sentenced to federal prison for a speech crime such as this in the history of the republic? Speaker 19: Well, this is this is the first prosecution of its kind, Charlie, under 18 USC two forty one. And, this was a statute that was passed in 1871. It was aimed at preventing the Klan from exercising power and intimidating African Americans and who were who were newly emancipated from slavery. No such prosecution has been brought in the history of our country under that statute. Now, I mean, can can speech provide a, a predicate basis for criminal liability in other contexts? Yes. But it's we've maintained in court filings. This is Speaker 1: Waking up the woke. Speaker 5: Oh, you should get over that quickly. Speaker 1: One brainwashed radical at a time. Speaker 6: That's enough. Speaker 1: It's the Charlie Kirk show. Speaker 6: Preserving liberty means more to me than anything else. You see, we're a very important time in our nation's history. You look around in this room. Don't give me this nonsense that Americans are giving up. That is not true. Okay. America Fest. That's amfest.com. Get your tickets right now. Amfest.com. Biggest speakers in the whole movement, Tucker Carlson and many others. We continue with Candace Owens in just a second. Alright. Candace Owens continues with us. Candace, I'm I'm curious. Has Ben Shapiro called you privately to try to fix this, or is this all just been a public dispute? Speaker 9: It's all been public. I'm I've been, you know, very surprised by it. It's like I said on Tucker last night, something that I think is unfairly a blemish to the Daily Wire because, you know, the four of us, other hosts that work here at the Nashville campus are, we get along very well, you know, and I think that this looks like something that it's not because Ben is not a part of the day to day operations. And I'm not sure why his instinct is always to air something publicly. You know, Charlie, you and I worked for years together. We have had so many disagreements. I would call you, text you directly, yell at you, you know, that's that's healthy, you know? But I I would never just throw out a random tweet and expect you to see it when we were having any of those disagreements. When people text me and say, disagree with Charlie on this, I will just text you, like now up until this day. You know, what did you mean by this? Why are you doing this? Yes. We have to be able to have healthy dialogue and healthy instinct even when we are not understanding each other. Doesn't make it better to let things become public fodder. And it's why I did not want to meet Ben where he was at in engaging anything that was disparaging about him. Because look, I'm 34 years old, I have my third kid on the way. I know how to communicate like an adult. And so, yeah, I don't still yet fully understand where he is coming from. And I do think that we have all tried to be exceedingly understanding of his emotions during this time, as somebody who has familial ties to Israel. And understanding that over the last five weeks, it's been a very emotional time for him. And that's, you know, the human place that I have tried oops. Sorry. Dropped something there. The, you know, the human angle that I have tried to take in trying to perhaps understand why he is airing some of this publicly. Speaker 6: Yeah. Look. I I as I said, I've known known Ben for a long time. I hope he fixes that because leadership should not leadership should warrant the tough conversation and to do it in private. It's by way, it's not good for the movement. It's not good for the Daily Wire. We need the Daily Wire. Need the Daily Wire strong. It's an important company. Those amazing things. Walsh knows Knowles, Jordan, yourself, all that good stuff. So, Candace, fine. Just a couple minutes remaining here. This Israel issue, I'm afraid, is breaking both the left and the right simultaneously in different ways. What can we do to make sure that doesn't happen? On the right. The left can they can go to hell. On the right. Speaker 9: Well, we need to act like conservatives. We need to practice what we preach. We talk about free speech. We can't suddenly buck the trend of free speech because we're angry or we're upset. We talk about the need for more dialogue. We talk about the need for less libel. We talk about the need for less smears in the media. We cannot engage in that. We can't engage in the behavior of left ists just because we have become upset or an issue is close to us. Consistency is what is called upon. We must remain ideologically consistent. I think it's important to call balls and strikes within our own movement, but and I think that that's part of the problem is that many people are not, as I've spent our calls in behaving with consistently conservative principles on these matters. And I'm seeing a lot of behavior that mimics BLM right now. And that is going to, without question, cause a fracturing in the movement by people that are well intended. And look, I think that we were all way already sensing this sort of civil war in the conservative movement. And I think that's best represented by the very different perspectives that even the candidates that are running have. Are we America first? Do we believe that we should be engaging in overseas conflict all the time nonstop? We are, I think, as Vivek Ramaswamy said, going through this sort of adolescence period of trying to define what the conservative party is. And I I think it's changing. I think Trump was a huge part of that sea change, obviously, and and realizing that there's a frustration. I think younger conservatives feel a little disconnected and detached from some of the older conservatives in the movement for certain reasons that have become accustomed to military, industrial complex instincts, and constantly saying that our allegiance somehow be overseas, and they become accustomed to constantly being involved in overseas complex. And I think that we want something different. And the first thing that we want that is something different is healthy debate, and demanding healthy debate. Demanding full throated discussions and not emotional responses no matter what happens. Whether Russia invades Ukraine, we deserve a full throated debate about whether or not we should be sending billions of dollars unaccounted for over to Zelenskyy. And whether or not it's COVID policy, no matter how fearful people are, we deserve to have a full throttle debate about how we live in a COVID era. Do we still have our freedoms or do we become people that are suddenly authoritarian because we have fears? That is the future of the Republican Party that I want to see, is are people that can look back and say, whether you agreed with me or did not agree with me, I remained consistent, and I hope that you respect that. Speaker 6: I'll give some advice. Candace Owens is undefeated, everybody. So be careful fighting Candace Owens. Doesn't end well for you. Candace, God bless. We have your back and have that baby. We'll talk to you soon. Speaker 9: Thank you so much, Charlie. Such a pleasure to always join. Speaker 6: Thank you. Email us freedom@charliekirk.com. Enjoy Jack Passoeck. Third hour coming up. Speaker 19: Justice is contemplating just that. Other prosecutions predicated on the spread of misinformation and disinformation. And, Charlie, as we know from the COVID pandemic, today's misinformation and disinformation and conspiracy can be tomorrow's conventional wisdom. It's a path we can't go down. It's Pandora's box that we can't open. It's been opened in mister Mackey's case, and it has to be shut down on an appeal. And, again, that's why we're asking your audience to go to memedefensefund.com. Speaker 6: Douglas Mackey's case is the basis for the the Smith case against Trump. Same law, they escalate and they elevate. So, James, tell us about that. And by the way, it's memedefensefund.com. This impacts every single every single patriot out there that you could you could be a young man who now is a father. He misses the birth of his son so that these cockroaches, these maniacs, these vermin and swine can bring him in front of a judge to put him in federal prison for seven months, and there are no victims. James, I just want you to reiterate that. Who was victimized by his meme? Tell a bad joke and you go to jail? Speaker 19: Well, Charlie, the the government did not put on, did not forecast before trial and at trial, did not put on a single witness that said, I saw this meme. I was confused. And as a result, I texted my vote and didn't exercise my right to go to the polls or vote by mail or whatever other legal mechanism of voting was available to that person at the time. So not a single person, not a single confused voter who did not get to exercise their right to vote. And yet Douglas Mackie is going to prison for seven months anyway under this ruling and under the verdict unless it's overturned on an appeal, which is again why it's why it's so critical that we had the theory of prosecution at off of the past. And and and another thing for your audience to know, you know, we talk a lot of this country about our democracy, and people make allusions to it that our democracy in the case of former president Trump is under attack in many ways in the ways that he's trying to curtail the influence of the administrative state. It's important for your audience to know that Congress repeatedly considered whether or not to create criminal liability around election misinformation and disinformation. They considered various proposals to do that, and they rejected them. It never passed a proposal like this never passed the House or the Senate and and was signed into law by a duly elected president. And yet Mr. Mackey asked to report to prison in January anyway because the administrative state, the deep state, was able to stretch and contort a statute from 1871 to achieve an outcome that was not politically viable or could not be pushed through the congress. And and and that is really what the regime means when it talks about our democracy. It's not about voting. It's not about elected representatives voting. It's about unelected prosecutors and bureaucrats using statutes to enact its will and impose its will on the American people without votes. Speaker 6: Christina Wong tweeted on 11/08/2016, hey, Trump supporters. Skip poll lines at election two thousand sixteen and text in your vote. Text votes are legit or vote tomorrow on Super Wednesday. Christina Wong is still making jokes, was never investigated or indicted, and Christina Wong continues a living a free life. Meanwhile, Douglas Mackie did the exact same thing, even less blunt, by the way, and he is going to federal prison. The website is memedefensefund.com. Everyone should contribute memedefensefund.com. So James, what is your approach for the appeal going to be? First amendment protections, fifth amendment protections, what will your approach be for appeal? Speaker 19: Well, Doug's appellate team will undoubtedly raise arguments under the first, fifth, and sixth amendments. I mean, as the first amendment issues are are are have been talked about quite a bit. The fifth amendment issues relate to the use of a very vague statute. Again, as I mentioned in the opening segment, this is a law that was passed in 1871. And it is the text of the statute bars conspiracies to injure, quote unquote, to injure individuals in their exercise of protected rights. And so one of the arguments I'm sure his appellate team will make is that the statute itself is impermissibly ambiguous and vague, and attack it on on a void for vagueness challenge under the Fifth Amendment for lack of notice under the due process clause. You know, the Sixth Amendment issues relate to, among other things, mister Mackey's defense not being able to cross examine a confidential government witness who was allowed to testify basically under shield on the nature of that individual's ongoing relationship with the FBI. Under the sixth amendment, criminal defendants have a right to cross examine their accusers in public in open court. And one of the problems among others with this prosecution is that Mr. Mackie didn't get to do that in violation of the Sixth Amendment. And again, this is bedrock stuff. I mean, this goes back to the right to confront your witnesses in in public and open court goes back to sir Walter Raleigh, the the the namesake of my hometown, who was locked away in the Tower Of London precisely because he could not cross examine his witnesses in open court. That's why we have the sixth amendment. Speaker 6: Yeah. No kidding. So and then I mentioned this before the break. Is there an equal protection argument here potentially? I mean, they they don't enforce this against Christina Wong who has obviously did the exact same thing. Speaker 19: Right. No. I that's that's another that's another avenue, for sure is the, selective prosecution. Though defendants, in in many cases, try the that argument. And and certainly, in this case, as you pointed out in the open, you've got similarly situated individuals engaged in similar conduct. But I think that's a that's a harder harder case a harder case to make than than some of the other other arguments. That's just my my impersonal view of it. But Doug's appellate team will will handle all of that. Speaker 6: Yeah. The prosecutorial discretion that we give the federal government, is remarkable. James Lawrence, thank you so much. Memedefensefund.com. Help out Douglas Mackie, a young man going to jail because he told a bad joke. You are living in the Soviet Union. James, thank you so much. Speaker 19: Thank you. Speaker 6: Email us freedom@charliekirk.com and subscribe to our podcast receiving thousands of emails regarding the first hour that we did about this New York Times 2024 poll, but we have election day tomorrow. If you live in Virginia, major election day tomorrow. Play cut one. Speaker 20: We've delivered results, and that's why I'm excited about what's gonna be on the ballot. I think we can hold our house and flip our senate. We can keep going because there's so many more important topics for us to focus on. Speaker 6: There's a huge push in Virginia to turn I think they call it the Virginia House of Delegates. Right? To flip it. Going all in on early voting, going all in on ballot chasing. Could this end up demonstrating and showing a path forward? Glenn Youngkin has a serious favorability rating. Could be a template. Could end up being a blueprint for 02/2024. We're we're about to find out how smart Glenn Youngkin is, by the way. Glenn Youngkin avoiding the 2024 race, he's a smart guy. Unlike Ron DeSantis, he's like, yeah. I don't know if I wanna see myself getting into that. Some people say, oh, do you think he'll be vice president? Trump will never pick a vice president taller than him, so that's probably not gonna happen. And so Glenn Youngkin putting together a a blueprint in Virginia. If he stays out of the presidential race and flips the house of delegates and gets behind Donald Trump, I'll have a lot of respect for that man. So I'm cheering for him. I really like what he's doing. He's doing the tough work. He's focusing on governing in Virginia and avoiding some of the national political chatter. Speaker 1: If you wanna wear three masks outside, then listen to public radio. Speaker 10: Fresh air. Speaker 1: Breathe free. It's the Charlie Kirk show. Speaker 6: Welcome back, everybody. Email is freedom@charliekirk.com. I wanna bring to your attention a very important story here, and we have a great guest to walk us through it. So until September, the FCC, the Federal Communications Commission, which we are regulated by here because we are on we are on AM and FM radio, was balanced with two Republicans and two Democrats. Now that it has a Democrat majority, it's starting to enact a very radical social agenda, everybody. And one such radical step just happened. The FCC just recently adopted a, quote, digital discrimination order on a three two party line vote. So here to speak with us today about this is Republican FCC commissioner Nathan Symington, who was appointed by president Trump back in 02/2020. Mister Symington, thank you so much for joining us. Please tell us all about this. Speaker 7: Absolutely. Thanks for having me on, Charlie. So this item that we just enacted at the commission takes a very short section in the 2020. Speaker 6: K. I I I hate to be dark, but it it really it really is something when the FCC guy's Internet is not very good. Is that is that too soon, Blake? I'm kidding. He's a great this is what net neutrality will get you, everybody. Alright. We're gonna get him back in a second. Boy, we've really had we've had the stars aligning with Internet. Everybody, email us freedom@charliekirk.com. We'll get him back. No. This is really important story. All kidding aside. This is why we can't have net neutrality and actually proves the point. The we we've talked before about how the civil rights act passed back in the sixties and all of these civil rights regime laws that followed the the civil rights era laws, I should say. They could be used as skeleton key. Okay, mister Symington. Sorry about that. I don't know what happened, but welcome back. Thanks. Please continue. Speaker 7: Yeah, big tech at it again. So thanks for having me on, Charlie. So as I was saying, this item take the short section in the 2021 infrastructure bill that consists six and uses it to spin out a sprawling government takeover of the Internet. Actions a second six to five zero six did pass with some Republican vote, but its language was not nearly broad enough to support what the Democratic majority just voted to do with it. I'm sure people would not have voted for it if they knew that this was what would follow it. Speaker 6: Well, so look, the the government taking over the Internet sounds very sinister. So I just wanna be very specific. How is the government taking taking over over the the Internet? Internet? I mean, wanna are they gonna, like, nationalize Google? What are they gonna start taking over? Walk us through this. Speaker 7: Absolutely. Well, when people think about the Internet, they think about the sites and apps that they're using. But there's also a lot of physical infrastructure there, and it's very costly. This So is bad in a different way. It's about taking over the physical side, cell towers, fiber optic cables, servers. The justification is that some low income or minority areas have relatively low amounts of high speed internet. The FCC took just three words from the law preventing digital discrimination and decided that these low levels of internet subscriptions show discrimination by cell phone and internet providers just because they exist. Then the majority goes further and says any difference in service can be discrimination. Does one neighborhood have higher prices? Does one place have slower speeds, outdated equipment? If there's any difference, we can call it discrimination and we can find them whatever we want or order them to build whatever they Speaker 6: So what what would the ramifications of this potentially be? Could the FCC just fine you for providing Internet in a racist way as they deem racist? Speaker 7: I mean, pretty much. It's a it's a blank check. They could say, you have to build brand new fiber internet for this one town with 500 people. Some member of congress wants it. And then you have to charge them the same price you charge in Downtown Phoenix, where we'd have 10,000 people on the same line. And if you don't, here's $10,000,000 fine for you. Or here's another illustration. So you're deciding where to build out new fiber service. You're choosing an area between areas where you'd might make 1,000,000 a year versus 2,000,000 a year. The rational decision, of course, is you build out to the area where you're gonna have more uptake. Among other things, that would serve more people. But the FCC could fine you because it turns out that that was a more white area, whereas the $1,000,000 a year area is majority minority. And so the FCC is mandating what amounts to affirmative action and racial quotas for everything that the companies do. Speaker 6: Yeah. So I I wanna I mean, this just sounds like a mafia shakedown. Right? I mean, the the that but I I wanna just make sure we're clear. You said it's a federal government takeover of the Internet. Can you elaborate on that? That specific labeling? Speaker 7: Sure, absolutely. Well, we deal with regulated industries all the time and that's not necessarily takeover. Sometimes it's just everyone coming together and agreeing what they want the industry to look like and putting rules in place. But here there are no standards for when you have to bring a case or not, for how much you can find, for what orders you can give. Basically, there are no rules. And so the real effect is going to be that companies will be terrified because they won't know what they're allowed to do. The real question of what they're allowed to do is going to be determined by how much effort they spend sucking up to the government. And anytime the government wants them to do something, they'll have no choice but to come running and do it because the penalty for not doing that is potentially an endless legal nightmare. Speaker 6: So we've introduced this idea of a skeleton key before. I think Christopher Caldwell's book, Age of Entitlement, talks about how good intentions and a broadly written law can then be really given all the power to the enforcers or to the bureaucrats, and especially for left wing type priorities. Do you think that this fits into the criteria of an idea of a skeleton key law? Speaker 7: Absolutely. So no one is arguing, certainly not me, no one is arguing for the idea that companies should discriminate in how they lay out broadband. But using this idea that any difference in the real world amounts to discrimination is sufficient evidence of discrimination is the way that you turn every three letter letter agency, whether that's us at the FCC, whether that's the Federal Trade Commission, the FBI, the DOJ, whether you turn it in effect into a DEI agency. Every project has to have requirements and preferences, every agency has to be turned into a civil rights agency. So housing and urban development for example, they're trying to make it a legal requirement for cities to build low income housing projects next to or in the middle of any nice neighborhoods they have. There really doesn't seem to be any problem that can't be solved by calling people racist and punishing them for some other unrelated business decision. So another example, another one of the federal telecom agencies, NTIA, I'm an alumnus of them, they're distributing $40,000,000,000 in subsidies to build fiber internet, but they've loaded up the program. It's not just a fiber building program. It's a union labor mandate program. It's a DEI requirement program. It's a preference for government owned internet services program. And so you know, whether or not you think any of those things are a good idea, the point is that they've been put in in regs and therefore the agency has been diverted from its purpose to start doing all of these other DEI type things. Speaker 6: Yeah. So I mean, I guess a question I have is, is corporate America lobbying against all of this? I mean, do the traditional big uglies of the big firms? What where is their stance on this? Speaker 7: Yeah, because you would think that it's in their interest to have as much freedom of operation as possible. And to a degree that's true, and there will be counter pressure coming from some of the big companies in this area. But sometimes they sort of bring it on themselves. So if you look at the item that we just did at the FCC yesterday, when the underlying bill was still in Congress, a lot of corporate lobbyists actually said, we're okay with it. Congress gave them tens of billions in federal handouts as part of the same thing. So despite all those work strings being attached, overall they decided that it was worth it to be bought off. We need them to realize that this is a, in the words of my colleague, Carr, a Faustian bargain. In ten years the handouts will be gone but they'll have this digital equity arbitrage forever. It will never be enough. There's no way that you can ever make someone happy if there's no standard for what compliance is. On the other hand, by the time this comes along, people who were present at the original decision may well have collected their bonuses, retired, it won't be their problem anymore, it'll be our problem. Speaker 6: You stay right there, Nathan. One of the reasons I want to have you on is this is not a rule that's going to get front page New York Times treatment, but it's an excellent example of the subtle yet significant power of the federal bureaucracy, and hundreds of these decisions are made every single year. Not all of them get by the way, not the FCC has a board. Right? Not every agency has a board. And it just so happens, you know, we're here to talk about this. Think about the hundreds of other micro decisions the bureaucracy is making in equity and racial this. It adds up to a less free country. Nathan Symington, please stay right there, excellent job. MyPhD Weight Loss, check it out right now, that's MyPhD D weight loss. It's amazing at myphdweightloss.com. If you want to shed a few pounds, check out my Ph. D weight loss. I have lost over 25 pounds and I have no trouble maintaining it and I feel great. If you need to lose a few pounds, you don't have to do it alone. Give them a call at (864) 644-1900 today and get that first time consultation on your schedule. Your PhD nutritionist can set up a start date together, but don't put off the call. Working that call into my busy schedule a year ago has changed my life and I want the same for you. It is one of the best calls that you can make. So check it out right now, at myphdweightloss.com. Call (864) 644-1900. Call them today right now at myphdweightloss.com. That is myphdweightloss.com. Nathan Symington continues on a very important story that won't get top line coverage, but it goes to show the power of the bureaucracies. Congress didn't vote for this. Bureaucracies just make it up. We'll be right back. Of the people. Patrick, thank you so much for taking the time. Patrick, your book confirms and or the poll, I should say differently. The poll this week from the New York Times confirms the thesis of your book. That's a better way to frame it. Tell us about your book and how also the data is confirming your hypothesis. Speaker 11: So my book is about how essentially the parties, the parties that we knew maybe when I was growing up have just completely reversed themselves in terms of the democrats used to be seen as this party of the working class, party of the people really standing up for the blue collar worker. And really ever since 2016, that really hasn't been true anymore. You've seen this huge reversal in terms of working class voters increasingly voting Republican and voted for Trump in 2016. And more so, a lot of these coal a lot of these groups voted more so in 2020, including Latinos, African Americans. Now that looks to be if if this poll is fracked, it's gonna be like that on steroids in 2024. When you look at Trump being at 22% of the black vote within eight among Hispanic voters, We really are seeing a realignment in our politics. Speaker 6: Yes. So what is driving this? Is it the Republicans embrace of populist nationalist ideas, or is it a combination of academic fantasy ideas of white liberalism that don't resonate with non college educated muscular class voters? Speaker 11: It is it is a it is definitely a combination of both, but I think that, you know, everything that we're seeing out of the college campuses over the last month suggests that the left has really learned nothing about how to moderate their message to appeal to the working class majority of the country who are not interested in these ideas of decolonialization, of intersectionality, of things that are only ideas that only somebody with an advanced degree even could could even fathom. So I I do think that they're just continuing to dig themselves a bigger hole. And you go back to it didn't used to be like this. You go back to as recently as the nineteen nineties. And Bill Clinton, you know, a lot of Republicans didn't like Bill Clinton when he was president, but he is somebody who really moderated his message, said the era of big government is over, signed welfare reform, signed the Defense of Marriage Act. All of these things that, you know, you could not see Joe Biden for all his, like, talk about for all the talk that he is somehow this sort of blue collar working class Democrat. He is just as beholden, I think, to the left as as anyone, and you just don't see that kind of democrat anymore. Speaker 6: Why do you think that is? This Donald Trump obviously changed American politics that will be one of his longest lasting legacies is reshaping the Republican party. Democrats seem comfortable. They don't seem as if they want to win over muscular class voters again. They think they can create a fusion of the permanently government addicted and the hyper educated Boston elite. Why is that? Speaker 11: Well, I think they're going to be net then reduced to that elite. That's what's starting to happen. So this idea is the Democratic Party has always been this coalition of folks who are, you know, these liberals, primarily white liberals, and African Americans, Hispanics, minority voters, right? I mean, has always been kind of the core of the democratic coalition and now we're seeing that break apart where significant chunks of voters in these minority communities have actually started to break off. I know there's been talk about this for decades or poll conservatives have talked about this for decades, but it actually seems to be happening. So what's going on? What's going on is a lot of these groups are actually better off. So you know, under under Donald Trump, Hispanic incomes rose 20%. Speaker 6: Welcome back, everybody. Email us freedom@charliekirk.com. It's a very important topic. It's very important. It's not getting a lot of coverage, obviously. Mister Symington from the FCC continues. So I guess the immediate question is, will this affect my own Internet? Speaker 7: Well, it definitely will because the federal government is putting out a huge amount of money for this, but all that money is competing with each other. You know, you can't just wish resources into being by writing a check. Even if you've got the power of the US treasury behind you, there's just physical limitations on how many workers there are, how long it takes to trench and put in fiber, how long it takes to build the tower and hang radios off it, whatever you might want to ask. It's going to make everyone's internet much more over time, more costly and the worst thing is it's going to deflate the value of developing a project. So fewer projects will get developed. Corporations don't just have big plots of money, they go out and get financing just the way that you might take out a construction loan to build an office building or some such. And all of those deals are going to be implicitly deflated by this. So we can expect high priority political areas to get the best results out of this and the forgotten middle to get the worst. Speaker 6: Yeah, that's Can you just kind of speak for a second of how the FCC is composed and how many members of the board are there? Just for the uninitiated to our audience, explain it. And then also explain your purview. Speaker 7: Sure. So with the FCC, there's five of us. That's a recent development because the third Democratic seat was only filled in September. So for most of the Biden administration, there hasn't been a third Democrat and we've been in a two-two situation, which may explain why this item didn't come up until now. But the most important thing about us is that at the commissioner level, we're independent. That means appointed by the president, confirmed by the senate. After that, you cannot get fired unless you're committing crimes. So that lets me get out here and say what I really think without having to worry that that the secretary of something or other is gonna fire me over it. Regarding the purview, so the FCC kinda gets started for two reasons. Number number one, the old AT and T phone monopoly, which was a government backed monopoly that was the alternative. The United States was the only country in the world not to have a socialized national phone system at the time. So we said, no, we're going to let a private company run it, we're just going to supervise it and the FCC was put in place to do that. The other thing was to coordinate radio broadcasting. When radio was a young field, no one knew how to coordinate frequencies and people would just run up the power level and transmitters and try to interfere with each other in the best markets. Obviously, that wasn't workable, so we started a system of assigning frequencies and sort of took it from there. So in the modern day, it's cell phones, it's the phone network, it's also radar, it's satellite communications, undersea cables, pretty much any interstate communication by radio or wire. Speaker 6: So that's very helpful. Thank you. Talk to the processes that there's term limits, right? Is that correct? There are terms on each one of the board members? Speaker 7: Five year terms. Speaker 6: Yeah. And so then what what if there were to be a different winner of the election, like if if Trump, for example, were to win next November, what would that mean for vacancies on the board? Speaker 7: Well, the chairman, or in this case, the chairwoman, it's tradition the chair resigns on inauguration day at So nine Trump's FCC chair, Ajit Pai, still had time left in his term, but he resigned on inauguration day. So the tradition is that every president gets to pick his own chair. Speaker 6: Got it. Me just kind of final question here. You were a federal regulator during the Obama administration. Why were we able to have you come on and say this, and we don't hear this from other agencies like the FBI unless we get a whistleblower? Speaker 7: Oh, I'm sorry, wasn't here for the Obama administration. I took office in 2020. But nonetheless, yes, I'm politically independent. That is a really unique thing about how our agency works, because we have powers which is like the executive, but we also have rulemaking powers which is like the legislative. And so they made us independent so that we weren't beholden to either one of those because it would be a stealing of power from the other branch, if you see what I mean. Now in the case of some other agency, at the end of the day, the person on top may be confirmed by the Senate and nominated by the president, but is not politically independent. They instead they might serve at the president's pleasure. Well, you want to get on the wrong side of the president, that's a very quick way to get transitioned out of your job. Speaker 6: Nathan Symington, thank you so much. Excellent job. Appreciate it. Thank you. Speaker 7: Huge pleasure, Charlie. Take care. Speaker 6: Email us freedomcharleykirk dot com and subscribe on our to our podcast by going right here. This podcast by the way, podcast is doing very well. Number 11 right now in Apple News, so we'll see if that improves throughout the day. We shall see. 11 in Apple News, so please take out your phone and subscribe to the Charlie Kirk Show podcast. Several stories we have yet to hit, so email us freedom@CharlieKirk.com. President Xi comes and visits one of his colonies. He comes home. He wants to see what he's been buying. He wants to make sure that it's been a good investment for the homeland. Our ruler Winnie the Pooh is on the homeland right now. We are back. Speaker 11: American incomes rose 20%. So there no there's no longer the sense that they are need to be dependent on the federal government. You talk to people. I visited the Rio Grande Valley of South Texas, and you talk to people down there and they want to get ahead by their own hard work and are very suspicious of anyone who is on government welfare benefits. I mean, that is a really big concern. When you talk to people down there, see who talk about, like, why is there a Tesla in front of the unemployment office that shouldn't be happening? So it's a very different kind of politics that I think people on the left and, you know, frankly, some people on the right have assumed about about these people. They want they're achieving the American dream. They wanna get ahead, and they realize the Democratic Party is not helping them get there. Speaker 6: So let's just talk pure numbers in the states that matter, Georgia, Wisconsin, Arizona, maybe Pennsylvania. If these trends continue and Republicans get near 50% or at least near an equilibrium within the margin of error with Hispanics and continue to do well with working class whites, but maybe do a little bit worse with upper middle class white voters, What does that mean? How how significant is the growth in the multi class the multiracial middle class to just get one more vote than the other guy? Speaker 11: I mean, I I think that what Trump showed in 2016 and why the election was so close in 2020 was the fact that this coalition of working class whites and the more African Americans, Latinos punches above its weight in the electoral college. You know, when it comes to the states that will actually decide the election, not just the Rust Belt states of Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, but also states like Arizona, Georgia, and Nevada. You know, those states have tend to have few graduates than the blue states where primarily all these college graduates, people with postgraduate degrees, people who are listening to the crazy ideas coming out of college campuses now. You know, those are concentrated primarily in blue states. So that's why I think Trump or any Republican candidate would have an advantage in the electoral college by appealing and talking to these voters. Speaker 6: Yeah. If you look so the state with the most college degrees is by far by far Massachusetts, and it's that way every single year, I mean, with Boston and all that. And then Colorado is right up there. It's the second, And then it goes Vermont, New Jersey, Maryland, Connecticut. These are these are traditionally democrat states. And then you go from the bottom up, the ones that have the least college edge by the way, that doesn't mean they're stupid. I don't have a college degree. What it means though is that they have different professions. They'll work with their hands, plumbers, electricians, carpenters, oil fields, entrepreneurs. It's not an indictment of their intelligence. And they also but most importantly, Patrick, author of Party of the People, Different Value Systems. Speaker 11: That is absolutely right. This is a group that has never you know, they have never had anything handed to them. They've had to work for what they have. I And think that just they're unified united by a common sense value system, even if they don't vote Republican. I think that, you know, you particularly talk to try talking, I think about the green new deal or this green transition idea within these minority communities. And the polling is pretty clear on that, that when it comes to people really saying you know, all this stuff about global warming is nice and you hear this in focus groups a lot, but it doesn't help me put food on the table. And I think the real the real trigger as much as, you know, as much as Republicans wanna pat themselves on the back for realigning these voters, the real trigger for this has been the absolute failure of the Biden administration to bring down inflation meaningfully. And the fact that, you know, we've had so much inflation has really hit these voters particularly really hard in the wallet. And these are the voters who are actually paying attention to performance. You know, I think if you if you have a college degree, it doesn't necessarily mean you have more accurate ideas about politics or or the world because I think you're primarily, you're very partisan and you're voting. I think you're very committed to existing your existing ideology and whatever information comes out, really just is gonna push you in one direction or the other. This multiracial populist coalition is very pragmatic, is very common sense, and they can see what's happening. Speaker 6: I I wanna keep on diving into this. But a minute remaining a minute and a half remaining, does the does the working multiracial class you're talking about, if the Republican party were to go to all of sudden and nominate like a Mitt Romney or somebody like that, they wouldn't necessarily be on on board for that. Correct? Speaker 11: Well, I think that is it's a little bit I think we are not going back to that kind of Republican party. That said, I do think that there are a number of candidates running who Speaker 1: Warning. You're entering a not safe for the regime media zone. Facts incoming. Speaker 6: Alright, everybody. Welcome back. Email us freedom@CharlieKirk.com and subscribe to our podcast. Xi Jinping is visiting the colony of San Francisco. This whole thing is very bizarre. So first, Gavin Newsellini goes over to China, he does a visit there. Runs over a bunch of Chinese kids when playing basketball. The whole thing's very strange. You take some sort of GQ Vogue photo op on the Great Wall Of China, his shirt unbuttoned. It's very clear that Joe Biden sent Gavin Newsom. And Joe Biden says, hey, pal. I don't want to make the flight. You go. Because I guess they were doing kind of like a a trip swap type thing. And so Gavin goes to China and Xi Jinping comes to America. So Xi Jinping lands and he's coming to see his colony. He's invested so heavily into capturing the elite of America. And boy, they have delivered. So there's several takeaways here that are critically important. The first of which is the most obvious. When I visited Seattle this last summer, it was a mess. It was dirty. It was filled with vermin and swine and homeless people and degenerates and drug addicts and raging ludicicks come up to your car and start beating. It's a disgusting city. And I started talking to one of the people at my hotel. I said, This is unrecognizable. I said, Yeah, but it was actually pretty nice for a couple weeks this summer. I said, Why? I said, What changed? I said, Well, we had the MLB All Star game in Seattle this summer and they cleaned everything up. I said, Well, isn't it really demoralizing that if all the media cameras are coming, they clean everything up and then they don't care afterwards? Yeah, it's demoralizing, also shows they can fix it. This can be fixed. Urban dirtiness can be fixed. Now I find it hilarious that of all the things that motivate them to clean up the streets of San Francisco, it's Jinping. As many people have been commenting, Gavin Newsom gives a long speech assuring San Francisco homeless they can go back to pooping on the streets once Xi Jinping returns back to China. Play cut six. Speaker 21: I know folks say, oh, they're just cleaning up this place because all those fancy leaders are coming into town. That's true because it's true. But it's also true for months and months and months prior to APAC. We've been having different conversations. Speaker 6: You're not as smart as you think you are, Gavin. It's true because it's true. It also shows elections don't mean anything in California. He knows that he's got that job for life if he wants it. Total totalitarian dictator. Maybe he's not that different than Xi Jinping. So Xi Jinping arrives and Gavin greets him. Hey, old pal. How you doing? Xi Jinping's motorcade drives through San Francisco and it's noticeably clean. It's the cleanest San Francisco has been in multiple generations. Who who would have known? All we have to do to clean up the streets of San Francisco is fly in dictators. Playcut 64. Where are the American flags? What's with all the Chinese flags? Not a single US flag. But to be fair, they probably didn't remove any. You know what they probably had to remove, though? Some gay flags. CCP's not big into pride. It's not a it's not a core Confucian value to have men become women. So they're meeting Xi Jinping and Biden decides to fly in. He's like, oh, I can take the cross country flight. Let's go to cut one zero seven. Speaker 0: Gavin was ready to take the relationship to the next level until he found out there was someone else, Joe Biden. The president flew in on Air Force One. Now Newsom had competition. When Chi saw Joe, they couldn't keep their hands off each other. As Joe likes to brag, he spent more time with Chi than anyone else. Not to mention the fact that Chi's guys bribed the Biden family. The chemistry was unmistakable. Speaker 2: I've never doubted what you've told me in terms of your candid nature in which you speak. Speaker 3: I still remember our interactions very vividly, and it always gives me a lot of thoughts. Speaker 6: Thoughts or thoughts? That's the question. So look. The Chinese Communist Party is the great enemy of America, but he comes in and gets a hero's welcome here in the country. And just to be fair, you should always be talking to leaders even if they're their enemies. I totally supported Trump having him over to Mar A Lago, but you gotta be very clear about what you stand for. So Xi Jinping comes to San Francisco. Now the one thing we can hope for is Xi Jinping goes back to China, and he gives a big speech. We are no longer embracing left wing Marxism. He's like, that's a mess. Like, he goes back, and he just denounces the whole thing. It's like, jeez. That's what we're heading towards. But understand, the bromance between Gavin, Biden, and Xi Jinping, it's deeper than you might think. China is not an enemy. They're not a competitor. China is the goal. We've said for quite some time that the lack of understanding of Maoism will be our downfall. We are living through a cultural revolution. Xi Jinping runs the Chinese Communist Party. The Chinese Communist Party is the same project started by Mao Zedong. Mao Zedong launched a cultural revolution. He had a moment where people could speak out and there could be free speech until repressive tolerance came. Struggle sessions were Maoist. There were 10 different categories that were created in Mainland China, five for fascists, five for communists. Parents were incentivized to train their kids in the communist way, and the kids were incentivized to turn in their parents if they were not a 100% behind the party. The American leadership look at Xi Jinping and they privately say, man, it must be awesome. Must be awesome, mister Xi Jinping, that you have all this power, that you can do whatever you want whenever you want to do it. The American ruling elite, Gavin Newsom and Joe Biden, they wanna be more like Xi. They don't look at this as a conflict between two countries. They look at America hopefully to become closer to the Chinese Communist Party model. Cut one zero eight, Winnie the Pooh says that China wants to be friends with The US. Yeah. Even though they attack us cyber, they send in their kids to our schools to spy on us, they buy up land near military bases, they dump, steal, solar panels, and critical infrastructure and plastic. They pump fentanyl into our country in the reverse opium wars. They have digital fentanyl through TikTok. By the way, did China ever pay for COVID? Did they ever pay for COVID for creating a virus in the laboratory? Did anyone even mention it? Of course not. Joe Biden is there to go kiss the ring of who's been paying for the lifestyle for the Biden family for years. Play cut one zero eight. Speaker 4: Whatever stage of development it may reach, China will never pursue hegemony or expansion and will never impose its will on others. China does not seek spheres of influence and will not fight a cold war or a hot war with anyone. China will remain committed to dialogue and post confrontation and build partnerships instead of alliances. It will continue to pursue a mutually beneficial strategy of opening up. The modernization we are pursuing is not for China alone. We are ready to work with all countries to advance global modernization featuring peaceful development, mutually beneficial cooperation, and common prosperity, and to build a community with a shared future for mankind. Speaker 6: I mean, everything he's saying is a lie. They they lie professionally. They don't have a moral code like we do in the West. It's all about power. It's all about expanding the Chinese Communist Empire. They own ports of entry all throughout Africa and South America. The Belt and Road Initiative is the recreation of taking over the world. I mean, I can go through the list, and our leaders take it. Our leaders say, oh, yes. Must be so great. What great relations that we have. In a rare moment of honesty, Joe Biden calls Xi Jinping a dictator, Not exactly smart diplomacy, but honestly, I respect the candor. Plague at one zero nine. Are we becoming more like China or is China becoming more like America? The promise of free trade and the promise of neoliberalism is that eventually China would become like America. They become a liberal democracy with private property rights and entrepreneurship and free speech. We were sold by the Mitt Romneys of the world and the Paul Ryans of the world and George W. Bush and Dick Cheney. We were sold by the Bill Clintons, and even to a lesser extent, Ronald Reagan, that eventually China would liberalize and they would just become an open minded country because the more we traded them, the more it changes their values, and the opposite happened. The more that we have traded with China, they have got wealthier, but they've also become less free. They've become far more totalitarian, less open to different and new ideas. Most Americans never used to worry about the Chinese Communist Party until Trump woke us up. And understand the Chinese Communist Party owns Joe Biden, owns many members of the American government. Here's a montage of Joe Biden saying the rise of China was good, of course, because he's on the payroll. He's a traitor to The United States The United States, and he's a agent of the Chinese Communist Party, play cut 60 '7. Speaker 2: Let me be clear. I believed in 1979 and said so, and I believe now that a rising China is a positive development, not only for the people of China, but for The United States and the world as a whole. We want to see China rise, to continue to rise in a responsible way that will benefit you most, China, because you have an important role to play. A rising China can be a significant asset for the region and the world and selfishly for The United States. Speaker 6: He is an agent of the Chinese Communist Party. Are your kids or grandkids spending hours on YouTube and Netflix getting indoctrinated by woke ideology? It's time for you to take control over what your kids are watching and what is going on to shape them as they grow up. Sherwood is a content platform that offers ad free wholesome entertainment for families with traditional values. Make no mistake, the left is pushing their CRT and their trans agenda and it's making its way into kids entertainment. Sherwood has a library of audiobooks, ebooks, videos from classics like Velveteen Rabbit and Treasure Island, one of my favorites, to timeless cartoons and other entertaining content. It's a lifetime subscription to Sherwood Kids. It's usually $750, but this month only you can get a lifetime subscription for just $299. Just use promo code Charlie. Sign up today at sherwoodkids.com. That is sherwoodkids.com. Take back control over your kids' entertainment. Are you tired of playing defense with your kids' entertainment? Well, today, children can't even walk in the library, turn on the TV without seeing progressive nonsense and agendas everywhere. That's why we love Sherwood. It's ad free, wholesome kids entertainment platform that shares your value values. Sherwoodkids.com. Wonderful company. Check it out. Special deal. Sherwoodkids.com. Email us freedom@charliekirk.com and subscribe to our podcast. Open up your podcast app and type in Charlie Kirk show. So much more to cover. Email is freedom@CharlieKirk.com. We'll be right back. Speaker 11: By and large, capitalize on this on these trends. And you see it in a place like Virginia with Glenn Youngkin, you know, who did really well, and we'll see, you know, in the election tomorrow, you know, how well his candidates do. But I do think that, you know, we are permanently on a trajectory, I think here, where people are gonna have to, you know, Republicans are gonna have to realize, you know, it's not, you know, it's not gonna be the case that, you know, you're fully going to go back to where we were before Trump. And I think people in the establishment need to understand that too. Speaker 6: Patrick Raffini, stay right there. We have you for another segment. I encourage people to check it out. Party of the People inside the multiracial populist coalition remaking the GOP. So, Patrick, if you were advising the Republican party to go into 02/2024, there is a open question. Do you try to run up the score in the rules and go straight working class voter, or do we just kind of forget the upper middle class suburban type voter? Is or is it a balance of both for every messaging you do, you know, towards suburban? You might turn off some of the working class folks, or there are issues that can bridge the divide. What would you say, Patrick Rafini? Speaker 11: I think you always have to look at the issues that will bridge the divide because you're gonna you're gonna kill two birds with one stone that way. But what I do think that right now, are very concerned about the border. People are very concerned about the economy and the state the continued high inflation, the fact that, you know, prices are 20% higher than they were when Joe Biden was inaugurated. People are concerned about crime. We used to think about a lot of those issues as base issues, but the failure on those issues has been so great that those are not just base issues anymore. Those are issues that really resonate across the spectrum with independents, moderates, and they also resonate with Hispanics and African Americans too, especially. So I think like, we have plenty of issues. If we can stay focused, I think on those three issues, I think Republicans are gonna be in good shape. Speaker 6: Yeah. And I mean, so the the other question I have for you is that can another candidate other than Trump continue a multiracial type working class coalition? We've seen a little bit of evidence of that with DeSantis in 02/2022, but it hasn't really been replicated. It seems as if rural turnout dives a little bit, that kind of mystery voter is hard to replicate. Can it be done? Speaker 11: I think it can. I think it can in the sense of, yeah, you you have seen it. You you definitely have seen it with DeSantis. You've seen it with a candidate like I mentioned Junkin as well. I do think that in the sense of, I mean, you may have, and when you have candidates like, look, mean, MAGA was not a huge fan of Brian Kemp, but in Georgia, he carried that state in a landslide. Really, he carried by eight points and he won in all the places Trump won, but he added back some of those suburban voters. So, yeah, I think that any of these candidates. Speaker 6: Alright, everybody. Welcome back. Email us freedom@charliekirk.com. Story and politico dot com. Very interesting. We are mentioned. You guys are mentioned, actually, all of us together. Ronna McDaniel is under siege, and her critics concede she's likely to survive. For now, we shall see. She is likely to survive for the time being. It goes on to say that the members of the one sixty eight in the RNC, they think she's doing a great job. I wanna read one of these here. So there's a guy, Jeff Kaufman, brave soul from Iowa. He thinks that Rana's doing amazing. Having worked with chairwoman Rana over the past two election cycles, I could not have asked for a better partner to ensure help us ensure historic up and down republican victories in Iowa. Without her support, Iowa and the Iowa caucus would not be the first in the nation. She has my full confidence as we head into the thick of caucus season. Okay. That that's that's not an unfair statement as far you have to you have to fight for your state. You have to fight for your state so you get you get the caucus, but is she gonna help us win the White House? And by the way, Jeff Kaufman. It's not because of Rana that Iowa has turned red. It's because of Trump. Trump has turned Iowa from battleground state to a deep red state. Period. End of story. Iowa was a fifty fifty state. Barack Hussein Obama won it in 02/2008, and Iowa is now deep red because of Trump, not because of Rana. But Jeff Kaufman, your argument is that we should have Rana remain the chair because you guys got the Iowa caucus first. Like, that's a really I'm I I get that's what you have to do. You should fight for that in Iowa. I believe by the way, believe Iowa should be first. That's a bad argument for why she should stay chair of the RNC. We're mentioned here, quote, Charlie Kirk urged Trump to push for a change in leadership. Quote, there's still time to course correct on many of the structural problems of the RNC, Kirk said in a statement, but we need to move Kirk and Turning Point have tried to unseat McDaniel in the latest RNC election, but we fell short. That is correct. We did fall short. In the aftermath of last week's elections, the simmering frustration with McDaniel has become far more pronounced. North Carolina GOP chair Michael Watley says, I was disappointed with a vague statement. What the RNC is trying to do is give everyone of these candidates an opportunity to communicate their message to the American people. Hey, Michael Watley. Why aren't you disappointed that we got our clock cleaned? Last Tuesday? There is a petition. It's firerana.com. It's brought to you by Vivek Ramaswamy. Laura Ingram kinda butted heads with Rana. Play cut 13, please. Speaker 22: Why should you retain your job given the track record of the party under your leadership? And to that, what do you say? Speaker 23: Well, first, I'm gonna continue to focus on Joe Biden and Democrats. And I think there was a moment missed during that debate by Vivek to talk about the fact that we still have 13 American hostages in Israel. The fact that for the first time ever in the history of either party, we had a Jewish co sponsor for a debate, and we are in very perilous times in our country. Speaker 6: No. No. I'm sorry. Enough gaslighting. Are you a winner or a loser? Enough of the fluff. Okay? And by the way, I'm so tired of this. I don't do messaging. I do messaging. I can't spend money on state races. I to get your act together. Okay? It's always it's always a dick it's like a escape hatch. It's like constantly hold on a sec. I can't pin this thing down. Play cut 14. Speaker 22: One of the things, Arana, that happened was, I I think in Virginia, people were wondering where the money was, whether they were gonna get some help from the RNC. And I I know at one point, you said that that you were not asked for money in Virginia, but a source, Republican source familiar with the Youngkin team in Virginia told the angle late tonight that that is false. And there, meaning your story keeps changing. Anyone who thinks Virginia Republicans wouldn't wanna help when we knew we'd be outspent isn't being serious. You know, Rana, they were outspent by $8,000,000. Speaker 23: Glenn Youngkin and did a phenomenal job and he raised a lot of money. A lot of people don't understand fundraising. I can't raise state dollars. I don't get unlimited convention and and state dollars. And these were state house and state senate races. The r n c gets federal committee. So, I mean, come on. Speaker 6: First of all, what what are you talking about? You you I think there are segregated accounts, but is it not true that the r n c data is used by Republican candidates up and down the ballot? True or false? So and this is like a major slippery gaslighting thing. And when the great Larry O'Connor asked you about it, you said, oh, they didn't need the money. You didn't use that. It's either you can or you can't. Do you do messaging? We don't do messaging. It's the candidate's fault. Here's the essence. Losing. You gotta go. You gotta go. It's not personal. You're a sweet person. Go find something else to do. Email us freedom@charliekirk.com. See you guys tomorrow.

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

https://t.co/zCr1z8kYfg

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

👀Charlie Kirk's “Security” and Their Ties to Israel (I'm adding “NOT SUICIDAL” to my bio) Charlie Kirk's private security was handled by a detail that sometimes included former Secret Service agents and U.S. Marines. The security team, contracted by his organization Turning Point USA, was led by former FBI agent Greg Shaffer. The internet (and possibly Shaffer himself) is now distancing him from Kirk’s security. If you search for a connection, it will tell you that Shaffer Security Group stopped working with Kirk in 2022. Despite the supposed security expertise, this is Shaffer's comment about the Kirk shooting: “We typically anticipated close-range threats...” There is no proof of any disconnection. A single AP article making that claim yesterday is the only source. You can clearly see that Charlie had the same security personnel in 2022 that he did at the shooting. The people in charge of Kirk’s security essentially did nothing to secure the area or inspect rooftops prior to or during the event, despite the fact that it would have been a simple four-man job that could have included cameras for the event. After the shooting, the crime scene was not secured, and they allowed the staff to simply pack up the area. 🧵 @HarrisonHSmith @IanCarrollShow

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

https://t.co/cOFlQXK14Q

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

Charlie Kirk Assassination Master Thread The Evidence (DEEP THREAD🧵ONGOING)

Video Transcript AI Summary
"If Bibi Netanyahu, if he does something I don't like and if I criticize it, am I, like, a bad Christian? Absolutely not." "What I find strange is that we're able to criticize the American government sometimes in the Christian world with more freedom than the Israeli government." "To be pro Israel means you believe in the nation of Israel Mhmm. Not necessarily the government of Israel." "When you when Joe Biden was president, you and I were what we loved America, but we detested our government. And those two those two things beautifully coexisted." "Exactly. And what they don't want is they don't wanna be called bad Christians Mhmm." "If they challenge a foreign government, which is what happens so often. Right. Like you're a bad Christian if you have a question about a foreign government." "Right. That creates backlash that I don't think people understand."
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If Bibi Netanyahu, if he does something I don't like and if I criticize it, am I, like, a bad Christian? Absolutely not. What I find strange is that we're able to criticize the American government sometimes in the Christian world with more freedom than the Israeli government. To be pro Israel means you believe in the nation of Israel Mhmm. Not necessarily the government of Israel. When you when Joe Biden was president, you and I were what we loved America, but we detested our government. And those two those two things beautifully coexisted. Yeah. You never you never once said, hey, I'm I'm out on America. On America's right. Exactly. And what they don't want is they don't wanna be called bad Christians Mhmm. If they challenge a foreign government, which is what happens so often. Right. Like you're a bad Christian if you have a question about a foreign government. Right. That creates backlash that I don't think people understand.

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

@enduring_light I do. it's blocked. @xdownloaderbot download this

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

@PinkDragonflies 😂Idk if that's a good idea.

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

@PinkDragonflies I found this one.

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

@ThPrnnlPhlsph Scroll down

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

@JamesAFreeman Scroll down. I'm sure it's ok now. Everyone concerned has it now.

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

@zKillian https://t.co/HD63I7jTs5

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

The Charlie Kirk Show November 16, 2023 | FULL Please Spread/Download/Post

Video Transcript AI Summary
On The Charlie Kirk Show, topics span Gavin Newsom’s Beijing date and Joe Biden’s reception of Xi Jinping in San Francisco, then pivot to Elon Musk’s Twitter controversy over a pivotal exchange about anti-Semitism and Jewish donors financing anti-white causes. The program cites Candace Owens and Tucker Carlson, and notes AIPAC’s plan to spend $100 million to defeat the Squad. Seamus Brunner’s Controllogarchs argues Bill Gates, George Soros, Mark Zuckerberg, and Klaus Schwab push a globalist AI-and-patent regime, including food patents, digital IDs, CBDCs, and abortion-pill profits. The show covers Douglas Mackey’s seven-month prison sentence for a meme-related conviction and his ongoing appeal. Heather McDonald discusses alleged anti-white hostility and crime statistics. The FCC’s digital discrimination order, a three-to-two vote, would enable broad DEI-driven internet regulation and ‘skeletal’ legality. The broadcast emphasizes free speech and multiracial populist realignment.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The Charlie Kirk show begins in one minute. The Charlie Kirk show begins in thirty seconds. The Charlie Kirk show begins in ten seconds. Speaker 1: The Charlie Kirk show starts now. Speaker 0: But today was supposed to be Gavin Newsom's day. After a romantic first date in Beijing where Gia showed Gavin his exquisite birds, intertwined trees, custom toboggans, Gavin thought he was a shoo in for a second date. She was flying into Gavin's hometown, San Francisco. And when Gavin found out, he grabbed the broom and cleaned up. Sorry, vagrants. I have a date. He waited for Chi at the airport, marveled at him as he descended onto the tarmac. And the way Gavin looked at Chi was kinda like how Taylor Swift looks at Travis Kelce. Gavin was ready to take the relationship to the next level until he found out there was someone else, Joe Biden. The president flew in on Air Force One. Now Newsom had competition. When Chi saw Joe, they couldn't keep their hands off each other. As Joe likes to brag, he spent more time with Chi than anyone else. Not to mention the fact that Chi's guys bribed the Biden family. The chemistry was unmistakable. Speaker 2: I've never doubted what you've told me in terms of your candid nature in which you speak. Speaker 3: I still remember our interactions very vividly, and it always gives me a lot of thoughts. Speaker 4: Whatever stage of development it may reach, China will never pursue hegemony or expansion and will never impose its will on others. China does not seek spheres of influence and will not fight a cold war or a hot war with anyone. China will remain committed to dialogue and impose confrontation and build partnerships instead of alliances. It will continue to pursue a mutually beneficial strategy of opening up. The modernization we are pursuing is not for China alone. We are ready to work with all countries to advance global modernization featuring peaceful development, mutually beneficial cooperation, and common prosperity, and to build a community with a shared future for mankind. Speaker 5: Let's talk about our dependence on China. Today, we're actually talking about Xi Jinping, picking on Donald Trump's word vermin to talk about that status quo. You know what's vermin? What's running around San Francisco on a given day before Gavin Newsom cleaned it up on a dime to roll out the red carpet for Xi Jinping. If he could do that for Xi Jinping, he could have done it on ordinary day, and yet we're here sitting talking not about the substance of that, but on one word that Donald Trump said in some speech in Miami. This is what's wrong with the mainstream media. Focus on the substance, and let's have an actual policy debate rather than talking to a presidential candidate instead of the policy substance of what's actually going on in the country, picking on some word that Donald Trump said on a certain day and asking me for comment on it. Speaker 1: You see, we're in a very important time in our nation's history. You look around in this room. Don't give me this nonsense that Americans are giving up. That is not true. Okay, get your tickets. Amfest.com. Amfst.com. Amfest.com. Huge speakers to be announced tomorrow. Mass of speakers. Can't wait to share that all with you. Excellent event last evening in Reno, Nevada. Really great people. We packed it out 1,300 patriots. Telling you the remnant is strengthening. It really is amazing to see. So God bless all of you that attended our event last evening. Lots to cover today. We got Candace Owen joining the show. We got so much stuff happening. Email us freedom@charliekirk.com. We're about to get started. Speaker 6: The Charlie Kirk show. Every day is a battle for your mind raging. Information coming from every angle with the will to deceive. Fear not. You found the place for truth. The voice of a generation that still has the will to believe in the greatest country in the history of the world. This is the Charlie Kirk show. Buckle up. Here we go. Speaker 1: Hello, everybody. Radio stations across the country. Honored to be with you. You can email us as always freedom@charliekirk.com and subscribe to our podcast. Excellent event last evening in Reno, Nevada. It's great to see so many of you. I cannot emphasize enough the win for liberty, the win for humanity that the liberation of Twitter has meant for all of us. It's remarkable. Liberating Twitter from what it once was to what it is now is a win for the narrative. It's a win for truth. It's a win as we try to fight back against this uniparty regime, the tyrants, and the authoritarian dictators that are running the country. Elon Musk, even if they shut down Twitter today, will go down as a major hero for allowing us to be able to speak, to question narratives, to get the truth out. Elon Musk got himself in a little Speaker 7: bit of Speaker 1: trouble yesterday. Elon Musk responded to a tweet that I actually don't think the tweet is that smart. I think one part of it is legit, but I think another part of it is not so great. But the essence of what Elon was responding to is a major thought crime in America that the world's wealthiest man would comment on this is historic. So here's the tweet and it's responding to a video and the video was basically a white father with his white son saying to his son, Hey, you think that, you know, you're posting online all this anti Semitic stuff, why don't you go and say this to these Jewish families face? Pretty powerful advertisement. This is the ad, okay? It's about a minute long, it's a powerful ad, and then a person on Twitter responded to this advertisement, and then Elon responded to the person responding to the advertisement. It's important. Bear with us. Because right now, Elon Musk is being targeted like never before. Elon Musk was supposed to speak at a summit today, and he's been canceled. They don't want to hear from Elon Musk because they are tarring and feathering him as an anti Semite. They've come after this program for calling us anti Semites. They're coming after Elon Musk for calling, they're calling him an anti Semite. So here's the advertisement. It's a powerful ad. Play Cut 79. I saw what you've been posting. Hitler was right. I didn't teach you that. You hide behind your screen, spewing all this hatred and ugliness. You got something you wanna say? Get out of the truck and say it to their faces. Okay. So that that advertisement then was responded to by this person, the artist formerly known as Eric. Quote, okay. Jewish communities have been pushing the exact kind of dialectical hatred against whites that they claim to want people to stop using against them. I am deeply disinterested in giving the tiniest swear word, Let's just say tiniest crap now about Western Jewish populations coming to the disturbing realization that those hordes of minorities that support flooding their country don't exactly like them too much. You want truth said to your face? There it is. Now, let me just say, this is not is not a very well written tweet. I said it's very confusing. I'll go through what they're basically saying here. Half of this tweet is true, half of it I don't like. You want the truth said to your face? There it is. Elon responds and he says you have said the actual truth. Now we don't know what part Elon is saying is the actual truth, so let's go through this. Again, it's double negatives and misuse of the word disinterested. It's a strange tweet that Elon pinpointed on here. But the first part is absolutely true. Let's go to this. Jewish communities have been pushing the exact kind of hatred against whites that they claim to want people to stop using against them. Now, I don't like generalizations. Not every Jewish person believes that. But it is true the Anti Defamation League was part and parcel with Black Lives Matter. It is true that some of the largest financiers of left wing anti white causes have been Jewish Americans. They went all in on woke and it wasn't just ADL, it was some of the top Jewish organizations in the country that have done that. In fact, we have seen this with the recent retreat of Jewish donations that are no longer going to be administered to colleges. Right? Mark Rowan, Leon Kaufman. Can we get that full list? It's very powerful. The part of the so that's totally true. And by the way, Tucker Carlson reinforces this. So I'm gonna kinda it was quite a day on the Internet. Tucker Carlson was inter interviewing Candace Owens. We have Candace Owens coming up next hour. And Tucker Carlson mentions that Jewish Americans have primarily been financing cultural Marxist ideas. We said this, by the way, last week, and people came after us. We came we actually said it in a different way. We said, I'm glad that Jewish Americans are reconsidering their financing of cultural Marxism. And people misunderstood it intentionally and slandered us as being anti Semites. But listen to this, Tucker Carlson is completely correct by saying this, that the philosophical foundation of anti whiteness has been largely financed by Jewish donors in the country. Play Cut 92. Speaker 8: However, then I thought, well, wait a second. If the biggest donors at, say, Harvard have decided, well, we're gonna shut it down now. Where were you the last ten years when they Speaker 9: were going Speaker 8: for WeisGenocide? You were allowing this, and then I found myself really hating those people actually. That you're okay with that? On what grounds were you okay with that? Speaker 9: And I this is what I've been trying to explain to the pro Israel lobby that what you are seeing is lack of support, is people that are asking the question is where were you? Yeah. As we have endured all of this. You were paying Speaker 8: for it actually. Speaker 9: Right. You were Speaker 8: paying for it. Speaker 9: You were you were paying for it. Speaker 8: Because you were calling my children immoral for their skin color. You paid for that. And I don't So why shouldn't I be mad at you? I don't understand. Speaker 1: So what Tucker is saying is similar to part of the tweet that Elon isolated that is true. That let's just say liberals, but that includes Jewish financiers of liberal causes didn't really care about University of Chicago having courses that saying, you know, the problem with whiteness. They didn't really care about American Express saying that we must eliminate whiteness. They didn't, in fact, they were supportive of it. A lot of liberals were okay with critical race theory, diversity, equity, inclusion. ADL went all in on the BLM type narrative and ADL is one of many different organizations that were perfectly fine with the growing anti white wave. Now to be clear, many of these Jews did not fully understand what they were financing. Their intentions were probably pretty good. As we've said, intentions mean next to nothing here. And I'm sure some of the intentions weren't so good, but let's just attention to the side. I'm not that interested in intentions. I'm interested in actions. Okay? Intentions are very hard to pinpoint. We get too caught up in the conservative movement on intentions. I learned this from the great Dennis Prager, who says stop focusing on intentions, focus on the actions. It's a much better way to judge whether or not something is right or wrong. Intentions, as I've said before, and there's a video that went viral, the Nazis thought they were doing good. They convinced themselves that they were doing good, when in reality, they were doing some of the greatest evil in the history of the species. Again, So Hamas thinks they're doing good. I could go through all this, but they're doing evil. So I'm not convinced that somebody's intentions are what matter. Many Jewish financiers culturally given money to George Washington University, Columbia, Yale, Dartmouth over and over and over again. Hundreds of millions of dollars, billions of dollars financing many nonprofits that many of them are now recognizing and realizing this was a bad idea. So I'm going to build this out because the second part of the tweet I don't like, and it ties into some news that is not so good for AOC. It's not good for Ayanna Pressley. I'm going to isolate that in just a second. But let me just say before I talk about my Patriot supply, it is sloppy. It is shallow. It is wrong and repulsive to call a great man, Elon Musk, an anti Semite. It cheapens the label of anti Semitism. It is not good for anybody. Okay, My Patriot Supply. I want to tell you guys about My Patriot Supply. It is an amazing service that you guys can have. In fact, they will bring your emergency preparedness food to you. Go to mypatriotsupply.com. That is mypatriotsupply.com. You are nine meals away from anarchy. Go to mypatriotsupply.com, to make sure that you have the emergency preparedness food for what might be coming next. I know it feels like things are falling apart. Make sure you are prepared for your family right now. Mypatriotsupply.com. That is mypatriotsupply.com. Email us freedom@CharlieKirk.com. Yesterday was one of the livelier days in the history of the Internet. We're just getting started. Stay right there. Noble Gold Investments is pleased to let you know that gold was the best investment class for 02/2022. Through all our record breaking inflation, crashing stock market, the crypto scams, there is one asset that has held its own, gold. According to longtermtrends.net, gold has actually outperformed the S and P 500, Dow, and Bitcoin for 02/2022. Had you invested in the S and P five hundred a year ago, you would be down more than 20%. If you invested in Bitcoin a year ago, you'd be down more than 65%. If you invested in the Dow a year ago, you'd be down almost 10%. Yes. Gold has outperformed them all in 02/2022, and silver is not far behind. Yes. While the world was busy hailing other assets as the real hedge, gold and silver are the only assets that would have protected your wealth. So join the thousands of others by opening a gold IRA or silver IRA with Noble Gold Investments. Get in right now, and you'll bag a free one fourth of an ounce American Gold Eagle coin with every qualified IRA of $50,000 or more. You can't go wrong with Noble Gold Investments and their thousands of five star reviews. Call Noble Gold at (877) 646-5347 to add real gold to your IRA. That's (877) 646-5347. We frequently get asked the question, who's in charge? Who is calling the shots? So it's clear it's not Joe Biden. There's somebody else that is in charge. Well, our next guest is Seamus Brunner, who has a new book out that is very interesting. Exposing the Billionaire Class, Their Secret Deals, and the Globalist Plot to Dominate Your Life. Sounds uplifting. Seamus, welcome to the program. Speaker 10: Hey, Charlie. It's great to be with you. Speaker 1: Tell us about your book. Speaker 10: Yeah. So I hear it all the time that the pandemic is over. The pandemic is in the path. That's not true. The pandemic was a blueprint for the future and you see it all the time. Our world is getting smaller. It's getting more and more controlled. We're losing control over our children's education, over everything from our food sources to our finances. And so this really lays out the people who are pushing this agenda. Speaker 1: Well, walk us through some of the specifics and the details that that are in the book, and, you know, we can go from there. Speaker 10: Sure. So we follow the money. We follow it all the way to the top at the Government Accountability Institute. We followed it to Davos. I know you've done some great work on this stuff. Let's see. Like, Bill Gates and the the food scheme he's got going. Everybody knows that Bill Gates is buying up all this farmland in The US. They know he's investing in creepy fake food companies, but they're you know, they're not really sure why. And so a lot of it is about money. We we follow the patents. Bill Gates, I mean, as a software salesman, he knows all about licensing and all about intellectual property. His father was an intellectual property attorney. He really helped Microsoft get off the ground. Well, he has used that intellectual property knowledge to start cornering the markets in industries like food. So for example, he buys into Beyond Meats and Impossible Foods only after they have received their patents. And that's kind of the whole thing with these fake foods. It's they say it's about climate change and solve you know, solving climate change, saving the planet. What it's really about is patenting our food sources. They patented the seeds. They've patented the fertilizers, and now they're patenting the meats. Speaker 1: Yeah. So, I mean, the more sinister explanation is that Bill Gates might wanna have less less people. What what what is the or what is the reason you would say that Bill Gates wants to control our food supply? Speaker 10: Well, that's absolutely true, and it sounds like a conspiracy theory. I thought it was too. And you see these clips every now and then of Bill Gates saying there needs to be less people. But that's what all of the characters in this book actually believe. They think that the Earth is vastly overpopulated, and population needs to go down. They don't ever really give you specifics on how they plan to bring the population down. Okay, Speaker 1: everybody. Welcome back. I mean the essence is this: Why do Jews continue to support institutions that hate them? Let's just make it as plain as possible, right? The the part of the tweet though that I want to isolate that I don't like is the kind of bitterness here. Quote, this person said that Elon responded to, I'm deeply disinterested in giving the tiniest crap now about Western Jewish populations coming to the disturbing realization that those hordes of minorities that support flooding their country don't exactly like them too much. This is where I disagree. I support own awakening. I think it's awesome that anybody wakes up regardless of if they did something prior in the past. I don't like that kind of bitterness and that kind of cynicism, to be honest. This person says I'm deeply disinterested in giving the tiniest crap about Western Jewish populations. I see it completely different. I think I think it's exciting and hopeful that Jewish Americans are starting to divest dollars from university campuses. I think that it's exciting when any population starts to reconsider their prior views. So kind of break out of the bitterness. Yes, of course, it's true that traditionally Jews have been funding in America institutions that hate them. And that's too bad. That's tragic. But there's the fact that they're discontinuing that, that they're speaking out against it, that gives me hope. So actually, I do have concern for that. So I I don't know if Elon was responding to that part of it. I think it was probably the first part. If I had to summarize again, I don't know. I can't read Elon's mind. He's gonna have to defend himself. He has sent out subsequent tweets mainly focused on the ADL saying why does the ADL turn a blind eye to anti white, anti Asian hatred while we import the third world that hates Jews and hates everybody? So he's clarified that. So to his credit, it's pretty clear. But this is very important. And we're starting to see some legitimate hope and movement in this direction, which I think is it was very exciting, which is that this announcement yesterday, AIPAC, the American Israeli Political Action Committee, has announced that they are going to spend $100,000,000 to defeat the squad. They're gonna spend a $100,000,000 to in Democrat primaries to go after AOC, Ilan Omar, Jamal Bowman, Ayanna Pressley, Rashida Tlaib, and there's two other black women. I don't know who they are. I think it might be Fox is the other one. I I I don't know. The squad has grown. Okay. They've multiplied in number. And AIPAC, the American Israeli political action committee is saying, we wanna get rid of the members of the squad. Now, of course, that's not the best use of their money. Their best use of their money is support Donald Trump, is an amazing friend of Israel, who fought against all this poison, but this is a better use of money than the traditional investments that we've seen from sending money to Harvard, sending money to Yale, sending money to the ADL, sending money to BLM. This is way better than APAC spending $100,000,000 to try to defeat Marjorie Taylor Greene or Lauren Boebert. This is now $100,000,000 that they're spending where AOC is gonna have to defend her turf. Elon Omar is gonna have to defend her turf. So to respond to this now viral tweet that Elon responded to, this person says I'm disinterested in giving the tiniest crap about Western Jewish populations coming to the disturbing realization. Wrong. We wanna win, and you should not say, hey, you're not welcome into the club because you made mistakes prior. I don't wanna be part of that political movement. I think that is callous, that is elitist, that smug. People should always be welcome to admit errors. Always. I think that's a bad attitude across the board. I held some really stupid political positions five years ago. Some people say, you're still not allowed in the club, Charlie, because you said something stupid five years ago. So there's no growth allowed. There's no forgiveness. There's no humility. Honestly, that's an anti Western value. It's an anti Christian value to say that what you said five years ago will always be hung around your neck and you'll never be allowed to grow, to develop, to clarify, to educate yourself. And I think it's actually exciting and showing that AIPAC, which does tilt Democrat, just so we're clear, most of the membership of AIPAC are Democrats. They are investing their resources to try and make it harder for Marxists to win. Is that the best use of their money? No. It is a far better use of money than what we have seen the last twenty or thirty years. It is a positive move in the right direction. So anyway, that's Elon Musk's response. Elon will have to defend himself. Elon is not an anti Semite. What Elon was probably isolating here, as he has clarified in subsequent tweets, is that hey, Jewish populations have been financing a lot of this stuff. It's good that they are waking up. I think it's positive. I think it's exciting, and it gives me hope. More after the break. Email is freedom@CharlieKirk.com. Speaker 11: Do you Speaker 1: know that the average American spends about twenty years in retirement? That's a long time to live without a steady income. And we wanna make sure you enjoy every moment of it and don't outlive your money. Retirement is about more than just investments. It's about living your best life. Let's not retire. Let's pivot. My friends at Pax Financial, who I use for my wealth management future, develop a course for the sole purpose of helping you pivot. If you want your own free guide to pivoting into the new chapter of life with purpose, visit packsfg.com/charlie. I don't think they're investing their money into the new modern day equivalents of hospitals or public parks. Rockefeller, for example, donated millions of acres in Maine and Wyoming, which we now know as the gateway to Yellowstone Park. They literally named the entire highway after it. You know, Carnegie built, you know, not just Carnegie Mellon Carnegie Mellon, but also huge amounts of public infrastructure projects. Talk about how this is a different elite. This is a different mindset. This is a separate psychology than we've seen of the elites a century ago. Speaker 10: That's exactly right, Charlie. The the, you know, the oligarchs so called oligarchs of the early twentieth century are nothing like what we're seeing today. What we see today with the big tech oligarchs is, like, it's got complexes on steroids. They want to control every aspect of your life from what you're eating to what you're seeing. I mean, information, of course, you you know, you talk about it all the time with the censorship and the clampdowns on descent. And as far as loving America, no. These are these are avowed globalists. They're loyal to the World Economic Forum, and Davos just they, you know, they call themselves citizens of the world. That's, know, the abolition of borders and Soros funding all of these migrant groups moving people into The US. He wants to do away with borders. And so, yeah, there's there's a you know, I they don't state that they're not loyal to The United States, but their actions and especially their funding show that they have other loyalties. Speaker 1: Yeah. The this kind of, other loyalties is important, and the god complex is bad. What's even worse than the god complex is wanting to use your kind of wealth and your power to remake the country, not to shore up its defenses. I mean, Henry Ford certainly had some issues. Right? But he poured into the country. He wanted a very strong country. And so where does this come from? Why is it that the new roster of the elites that you detail in your book, Controllogarchs, why do they hate the homeland so much? Where does this come from? Is it because they went to university? I mean, Bill Gates was a dropout. Is it because they were raised in a Silicon Valley finance culture that is more globalist minded? Where does it come from? Speaker 10: Well, let's see. Yes. That's exactly right. I mean, it's the globalist mindset. It's and it's not so it's not necessarily just America. It's more the peasant class. I mean, they have more in common with the elites of China, for example. I go, you know, into great detail about how they really love China, and they love the Chinese system. They love this amalgamation of capitalism and communism. State run capitalism is what they call it in China. Claus Schwab calls it stakeholder capitalism, which I know you've talked about, and it's sort of this esoteric term. But stakeholder capitalism, when you read Claus Schwab's manifestos, the people who don't aren't the stakeholders. He never talks about the people. We the people being stakeholders. It's always business leaders and NGOs and officials from, you know, the government. We don't have a seat at that table. Speaker 1: Yeah. So to kinda build that out further, though, which is there's the World Economic Forum. You have Klaus Schwab on the front page of your book. Everyone is driven by something different. I I I don't know if you agree with this. Do you think that Soros has a different agenda than Zuckerberg? I do. Zuckerberg seems like a guy who wants to end the game with the most tokens. Soros is a guy that wants to destroy the game. Would you agree with that? Speaker 10: Yeah. But they they I do I do agree with that. I mean, they're all they're all have different motivations to a degree, but they also have a lot of the same motivations in that they want to control, you know, every facet of life. I, you know, see it time and again both with Soros and with Zuckerberg. So, yes, they're they have different opinions. They're different people. Speaker 1: Yeah. I mean, I I just I I think that Soros is far more sinister and kinda say Machiavellian. Zuckerberg, I think, is malleable. I mean, based on all public accounts, people that have known Zuckerberg, he's used to be kind of this free speech liberal, almost libertarian, but I think he's a coward. I think that external forces have been able to shape shift Zuckerberg. I think he wants to be liked. I think he wants to have his empire. He wants to be reasonable. Soros is a legit ideologue. We we have no evidence that Zuckerberg in his private musings is all about, you know, western transformation. Right? Now he might be doing that, but as far as his intention, I'm not so sure. Speaker 6: Charlie Kirk Speaker 1: Okay, everybody. Hillsdale College. I'm wearing my Hillsdale tie today. With America's college and universities so morally corrupt, they're less concerned with critical thinking than with indoctrination. I'm happy to report there is a college where students debate ideas openly and honestly. It's my favorite college, Hillsdale College. You can learn more at charlieforhillsdale.com. As stated in Hillsdale's founding document in 1844, Hillsdale's original mission was to offer the serious kind of liberal arts education needed to preserve the blessings of civil and religious liberty across the land. Look, if you go to charlieforhillsdale.com, you'll find a short video. It's over a minute long showing how Hillsdale's work, not only on its Michigan and Washington DC campuses, but across the nation is effective in defending American liberty. Their online courses are excellent. You've got to check it out right now. Go to charlie4hillsdale.com. That is charlief0rhillsdale.com. As stated in the Hillsdale online documents, you've got to check it out. Charlie for hillsdale dot com. You could take the Victor Davis Hanson American citizenship class, the American history class, of course, on Aristotle, Winston Churchill, mathematics, Euclidean geometry, Genesis, Exodus. Do you want to learn? Charlieforhillsdale.com is the place to start. They do a wonderful job, and they are America's greatest college by far. So check it out. Charlieforhillsdale.com. Okay. So some of you might say, but Charlie, is there really a war on white people? Yeah. Let's put aside all of the obvious anti white violence we've seen in high schools, the white kid getting killed. You know, let's put all that aside, which which is clear. Let's put aside the University of Chicago course, the course at Yale, all that stuff. This is an amazing example of what we're talking about. Now, to be very accurate, you can't say that, you know, liberal Jews are funding this. Okay? What we're getting at, though, is that this example is one of hundreds of thousands that should really make you think deeply about what is happening in American education. It is fashionable. It is popular. It is in vogue to hate white people. I'm going to prove it to you. There's a new series of videos over the last couple of weeks that I've seen of students that record on Zoom high school debate competitions. Now, to be clear, high school debate is not what it used to be. It doesn't teach rhetoric. It doesn't teach persuasion. It doesn't teach public speaking. It doesn't encourage an authentic understanding of a topic. High school debate has become spewing of left wing talking points and they become winners. Now, recent weeks, high school students in debate again have been recording these debates on Zoom and have been putting them on the Internet to say, hey, look what passes as debate now. Look what passes as a popular argument or a what's considered to be a winning argument. So, oh, is this a guy that does this incubate debate James Fishback? I I guess he's the one that's tweeting this stuff out. It's very interesting. I I I wasn't aware of that. So I want you to listen very carefully. This here is a high school debate team that won the debate. I want you to count how many times they say the word white. This is what is considered to be a good argument. They ignored the prompt and resorted to shamelessly attacking white people, not once, not twice, but with zero depth whatsoever, blaming white people for all the problems. Listen carefully. This is what is considered to be a winning debate team in America today. Play cut one thirteen and listen carefully. Speaker 12: We demand that white Christians be held accountable for America's original sin. The negative continues the trend in politics while whiteness devours the other. Debating this topic is irrelevant while society is dominated by white Christians. Even if we have something educational to say about this topic, the political will just pray it away and continue their mission to conquer the world in the name of Jesus Christ. The military industrial complex has been coupled with American Christianity, the worship of the weapons of whiteness. United States was built to be a city upon a hill for white Christians. American Christianity has controlled all aspects of politics such as justifying slavery. We solved by decoupling weapons and worships and ending the crusade. White Christians literally inscribe scriptures onto their weapons, worshiping through war. We want to repent for our sins and show America's failure. By voting for us, the judge will send his signal to political leaders and condemn Christian in politics. Speaker 13: That ends up being a two one for Livingston. The affirmative tells me in summary and final focus that the role of the ballot for me is to reject Christian militarism. So at the end of the day, I'm left with deciding which side I think is better doing a better job rejecting Christian militarism. Speaker 1: That is considered to be a winning debate. They ignored the prompt and they just said, yeah, it's all about Christian militant militarism and white Christianity. That's considered to be deep. And they won. They won the debate. Where does that come from exactly? It goes down the tributary. It starts at Harvard. It starts at Yale. It starts at Dartmouth. And then it goes down. They create the teaching standards. They create the curriculum. And what many Jews are texting me to their great credit, They're saying, oh my gosh. High school debate will soon say this. They'll soon read a prompt. And it's the Jews' fault. They're an inch away from saying that. This close. And what Candace was saying and what Tucker was saying and what Elon is saying is that that clip I just played until recently did not bother most liberal Jews. And that's frustrating. Now it does bother a lot of liberal Jewish donors. Dots are starting to be connected. They're like, Oh, wait. All the toxicity and venom and hatred that we turned a blind eye to or we might have been cool with against white people is now being directed to us. So in that high school debate clip, you saw these kids reading a prompt, right? Reading a prompt, and they say, you know, white people are to blame for this. It doesn't take a massive leap to turn that high school debate kid to plug and replace, to copy paste white people out, Jewish in. That's where this comes from, guys. We've said this for the last couple weeks. Why is it that so many young people are on board for the Palestinian liberation thing or Gaza? Why are so many young people praising Osama bin Laden right now? It's a big thing right now on TikTok. Huge. Osama bin Laden is being praised by Generation Z because you've taught them to hate America, to hate white people, and then eventually hate Jews. And Hamas sympathizers are literally BLM two point o. You guys remember this. Here's cut one fourteen. White people begging for forgiveness from black people. This is during Floyd a Palooza. Play cut one fourteen. Okay. That's some sick stuff. Speaker 7: By the Speaker 1: way, it's sick on two sides. It's sick for the white people doing it and sick for the black people that are allowing it to happen. Like, some black guys should be like, this is insane. Get up. Enough. We're gonna take responsibility for our own problems. Get off your knees. Stop asking are you a you should have been are you KKK? Are you racist? Then stop apologizing. Enough. Stop pandering to us. You got that black woman crying. Oh my gosh. I've been waiting for this my whole life. I can get a job. Give me a break. The white hate gets turned into white guilt in the heads of weak minded people who then fall for the rhetoric. So where what does all this tie together, everybody? You are living through without a doubt one of the most heated, consequential, high stakes realignments in the history of the digital narrative war. I know that some of you might not see it, you might not be looking at it. If you are not actively on social media, you might not be watching it. I'm telling you, you are living through a TikTok, Twitter, Instagram. I have never seen sea changes like this ever. And we are flirting with some really dangerous stuff. Very dangerous stuff. There's some exciting stuff happen of people waking up and enlightenments and awakening and the rising of the frequencies. Producer Andrew said this morning, I have never seen so many people wake up so quickly. That is true. Simultaneously, I have not seen so much garbage, venom, crap spread so quickly in the history of the digital narrative war. Remember, Twitter is the incubator of elite opinion, but TikTok is the incubator of idiocy for generation Z. Let me say that again. Twitter is the incubator for elite thought. TikTok is the incubator of idiocy for Generation Z. They might say, but Charlie, let's compete on TikTok. We try. We have our, you know, I resisted as long as I could. They censor us. They ban us. They suppress us. TikTok, which is a Chinese Communist Party asset funded by the Chinese Communist Party, they elevate content that weakens America, weakens Western society. They will give priority to trans content. They give priority to gay content. They give priority to left wing politics, and they deemphasize pages that would talk about masculinity, borders, free speech, or conservative values. Chinese TikTok is all about solving math problems and games and being healthy and having big families. American TikTok is about cutting off your genitals, taking Lupron, and supporting Hamas. So what I'm getting at here, the macro, because some of you might say, but Charlie, how do all these different dots connect? You are living through right now one of the greatest changes of how people view the world in my life by far in my lifetime. I've not seen anything like it. COVID was close, but the difference with COVID is that almost all the means of communication were suppressed. We couldn't speak openly on Twitter during COVID. We kept on losing access to our Twitter account. We now have Twitter, so the truth can get out. We're like, wow. Could you if we had axe this is a this is the truth. If we had access to Twitter and Elon owned Twitter during COVID, I think hundreds of thousands of lives would have been saved. We got suppressed on ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, vitamin D, monoclonal antibodies. Imagine how many lives could have been saved if we had Twitter during COVID. It's a big deal. At the same time, we for every action there's equal and opposite reaction, we have Twitter and then we have TikTok, which is just this Wuhan laboratory of anti West hatred that Gen Z is just getting. It's pumping in. By the way, I've been completely unsuccessful. I tell parents, why do you give yourself your kids phones? Honestly, because parents don't want a parent anymore. That's why. They give their kid a digital pacifier so they can go back to wine and their kid can just stare at the screen all day long. Like, I don't know why my kid is depressed. Yeah. Go look at your kid's screen time. Okay? Eight and a half hours staring at TikTok. Yeah. I mean, don't be surprised when their suicidal ideation goes up. It's just so weird. Why do some of these kids depressed and anxious? Because they're staring at their screen all day long. Go be a parent. Go stare at a tree. Go fish. Go for a run. There's a life outside of watching a bunch of trannies dancing in favor of Hamas. Relieffactor.com. A 100% drug free relief factor. Knee pain, back pain, joint pain, elbow pain. Check it out right now at relieffactor.com. The 100% drug free Relief Factor could be the best solution for you. Leah was sitting on her couch in so much pain. She was literally in tears. You've got to check it out. She says, I'm so I'm truly amazed at this product. If you're living with aches and pains, see how Relief Factor, a daily drug free supplement could help you feel better and live longer. You're gonna get started. Try this Relief Factor three week quick start. It's only $19.95 and comes with feel better, your money back guarantee. Visit relieffactor.com. That's relieffactor.com. $1,800 for relief. That's $1,800 for relief. They're amazing. So check it out right now. Relieffactor.com. So please check it out right now. Relieffactor.com. One Sunday, Leah was sitting on her couch. She was in pain and got out of pain. Relieffactor.com. $1,800 for relief. Feel better and money back guarantee only $19.95. That is relieffactor.com relieffactor.com. Email us freedom@charliekirk.com and subscribe to our podcast. You are living through a digital realignment, a narrative war that is changing in real time. It's exciting and also scary simultaneously. We'll be right back. Because colleges and universities today are less concerned with critical thinking than with indoctrination. It is no wonder why so many young Americans embrace cancel culture, deny free speech to conservatives, and even celebrate terrorism. There is one college where students debate ideas openly and honestly, where they pursue truth together with their professors, and where America's great heritage of liberty is studied and revered. My favorite college, Hillsdale College. As stated in Hillsdale's founding document in 1844, Hillsdale's original mission was to offer the kind of serious liberal arts education needed to preserve the blessings of civil and religious liberty across the land, and this mission continues to guide Hillsdale College today. You can learn more at my favorite college's website, charlieforhillsdale.com. There, you will find a short video. It's just over a minute long showing how Hillsdale's work, not only on its Michigan campus, not only in Washington DC campus, but across the nation is effective in defending American liberty. Take some time to watch today at charlieforhillsdale.com. You are you're kind of super well built and trimmed. I think that's a good use of money. What's not a good use of money is his taxpayer funded electric vehicle ambitions. Tell us about it. Speaker 10: Yeah. That's right. And just going back to what you were saying a moment ago about Zuckerberg versus Doros, I think Bezos is a lot closer to Zuckerberg. Like you say, I mean, he had this sort of almost libertarian bent in the nineties, and it's sort turned into more I mean, he's very quiet. You don't hear much from him except when you see him doing these photoshoots. But it's yeah. But the with the electric vehicle, I mean, everyone knows about Amazon and Alexa. They're always listening to you. But what most people don't know is that they're actually trying to figure out what you're thinking. And and Amazon Web Services is, you know, a huge AI Speaker 6: Where tyranny dies and wisdom lives. The Charlie Kirk Show. Speaker 1: Somebody asked me the other day, how are you able to keep going on with this? Preserving liberty means more to me than anything else. You see, we're in a very important time in our nation's history. You look around in this room. Don't give me this nonsense that Americans are giving up. That is not true. Amfest.com. Amfest.com. Check it out. Phoenix, Arizona. It's gonna be the largest event we've ever held, god willing. Wait till you see the speakers we're announcing tomorrow. So get your tickets today while they're still there. Amfest.com. K. Welcome back. I I wanna just keep on encouraging APAC. I'm glad that they're deploying those resources in that way. It's not the best, but it's better, and that deserves encouragement and praise. God bless them. Candace Owens mentioned this, and we have Candace Owens coming up next hour. By the way, Candace was trending on Twitter all over the place, and people were so unfair to Candace Owens. I have her back a 100%. People say, oh, she's an anti Semite. I said, really? Candace Owens who dropped everything. I was in Jerusalem. It's a true story. I called Candace. I said, Candace, we have an extra ticket if you want it to go to the embassy opening when Trump moves the embassy. And she says, oh my goodness. She drops everything, eighteen hour flight, brutal connection through Europe, two red eye flights to get all the way to Israel for the embassy opening with Donald Trump. We saw where Jesus healed the sick. We went to the city of David. We saw the old city, and she loved it. So it's just these people, it's just so shallow, so sloppy. I don't like it at all. We'll talk more about that next hour. But Candace said this and she's and this is a vibe that is out there. And I don't think some of the pro Israel pro Israel advocates are listening when we say this. I'm gonna I'm gonna I'm in a separate category. I I have some bitterness that I've expressed on the show, which is the way that I've been talked about and treated has really bothers me, to be honest, because of how much prohazard advocacy I've done and do, but I'm a put put me aside. Okay? There is a Jonathan Greenblatt who runs the ADL. The ADL is an awful organization. He goes on television and he's saying this quote, Administrators are going to find their backbone if we hold them accountable. This is about the anti Jew hatred on campus. And by the way, he's correct in saying this to be perfectly fair. Donors need to hold them accountable. Students need to hold them accountable. Then he says the federal government needs to have them accountable. I don't really know what that means. Okay? But Jonathan Greenblatt, the reason why Candace said what she said on Tucker and the reason why the vibe on the right is off on this is we're like, really? Where were all of you guys the last couple of years? I thought hatred to one group is hatred to everybody. That's literally in the ADL ad. In the ADL ad is that all hate oh, I guess all hate is bad unless it's hatred of Asians and hatred of whites. Play cut 56. Speaker 14: The question I was gonna ask you, which we have now seen at least the beginning of some pushback finally from people who run these schools. You mentioned Columbia, other places. Do you see the leadership at some of these schools that you've been pushing so hard? Are they now finding the backbone you just described? Speaker 15: Well well, they're only gonna find the backbone if we hold them accountable. Donors need to hold them accountable. Students need to hold them accountable, and the federal government does too. And let me tell you, the university presidents, they might not listen to some students, but when they run the risk of losing hundreds of millions of dollars in federal grants, they're going to respond. Speaker 1: So there's a ADL is comprised of left wing, sometimes secular Jews. There's a major upheaval that's probably going to happen in the ADL sometime soon. Now why is it that the ADL receives such focus from Elon Musk and from us? It's not just that they're liberal. It's that the ADL goes out of their way to try and debank you. The ADL goes out of their way to try to pull advertisers from your show or from Twitter. The ADL, as he says accountability by the way, I think you should finally do that. By the way, if the ADL finally waves the sword towards colleges, I will be an enthusiastic supporter, but I don't buy it. If the ADL will be nearly as harsh to Harvard as they have been to Elon, God bless them. But they won't. They're gonna treat Harvard and Princeton and Yale with kid gloves, Cause the ADL are first liberals and then they're Jews. That's and you know who said that? Dennis Prager. So don't call me an anti Semite. Their liberalism is more important than their Judaism. It's always been that way. And they've been captured by a lot of secular Jews. So the question is, will the ADL be as ferocious, intense, nasty to Princeton, Yale, Dartmouth and Stanford as they have been to Twitter, to Jack Posobic, to Bannon? Probably not. You know, Greenblatt says, yeah, you know, we need some accountability. Really? Greenblatt, why don't you we know the answer because liberalism is very important to him, and Harvard is the holy cathedral of American left wing liberalism. Okay? Harvard is the Vatican of American leftism. It's just where they it's where the the catechism of the left is published in Harvard. So when he says accountability, why doesn't Harvard say, we're gonna defund you. We're gonna burn you to the ground because he doesn't he doesn't mean it. Okay. More coming up next hour. Email us freedom@charliekirk.com and subscribe to our podcast. Did you know that there is one phase of sleep that almost everyone fails to get enough of? And this one phase of sleep is responsible for most of your body's daily rejuvenation, repair, controlling hunger and weight loss hormones, boosting energy, and so much more. I'm talking about deep sleep. And if you don't get enough, you'll probably struggle with cravings, slow metabolism, premature aging, or even worse conditions. Why don't most people get enough of this one most important phase of sleep? A big reason is magnesium deficiency because over eighty percent of the population is deficient in magnesium. And magnesium increases GABA, which encourages relaxation on a cellular level, which is critical for sleep. Magnesium also plays a key role in regulating your body's stress response system. Those with magnesium deficiency usually have higher stress levels, which negatively impact sleep as well. Now before you go out, buy a magnesium supplement. It's important to understand that most products out there only have one or two forms of magnesium when the reality is your body needs all seven forms of this natural sleep mineral. That's why I Magnesium breakthrough contains all seven forms of magnesium designed to help calm your mind and you fall asleep, stay asleep, and wake up refreshed. The deep sleep benefits are really noticeable. Visit magnesiumbreakthrough.com/charlie and enter code Charlie 10 for 10% off any order. The special offer is only available at magnesiumbreakthrough.com/charlie. Speaker 10: Cloud contract type deal from the Pentagon. All of the big tech agencies are hosting their operations on Amazon Web Services. That's kind of a thing that goes really unnoticed. I mean, you see when you're watching an NFL game that Amazon's got the great stats, and I do enjoy seeing those stats that are you know, from AI that they're giving you. But think about all of that technology. They boast of it in the commercials being used against you. I mean, it's a pretty terrifying prospect. So I would say that Bezos amongst the people on the cover I mean, you're certainly right. George Soros is a total ideologue and and, you know, more terrifying in a lot of ways than what he's trying to fund with the chaos and the total destruction of The United States. You don't see Bezos totally funding that, but he's funding the climate change ambition, the so called climate change ambitions that are really all about control from the vehicles to the smart homes. I mean, there's some examples in the book of smart thermostats. If you got a smart thermostat, just imagine going home in the middle of the summer, going to bed and waking up drenched in sweat because the utility companies have decided they're gonna use your smart thermostat to keep the temperature high in the middle of the summer. It's happened in Texas. It happened in Colorado. You see Gavin Newsom in California telling people that their, you know, their temperatures of their homes need to stay up at 80 degrees when it's in a heat wave. I mean, it's just crazy. And Jeff Bezos is making the tech that allows you to do that. Speaker 1: The book is Controllogarcs. We will be right back after the break. Seamus Seamus, stay right there. Email us freedom@charliekirk.com and subscribe to our podcast. We'll be right back. The book is Controllogarcs. Seamus Brunner continues with us. So, Seamus, let me ask you about this one, weaponizing artificial intelligence. Controllogarchs are rapidly ratcheting up AI to extinguish what remains of a free market and push Americans into Marxism. This is a very deep topic. I've always been I'm I'm worried currently that AI is going to be used as a tool to create a tyrannical society even worse than what we have. Your thoughts? Speaker 10: You're exactly right to be worried, and it's happening right now. The intelligence agencies, they're using AI. They're gonna use the tech companies to do it. You look at the biggest company, ChatGPT. I mean, regarding the of all you know, getting rid of the free market. Look at the largest company behind ChatGPT, OpenAI. There's a reason that OpenAI is funding universal basic income studies. And it's I mean, they you know, there's other experts, World Economic Forum experts who say that AI is going to eliminate 40% of the jobs. Either you're gonna have to adapt or you're gonna be out of work. And, you know, I think the ultimate goal here, they sort of state it when they say you will own nothing and be happy in Davos, is sort of a peasant class living in high rise buildings and ultra low emission zones with no cars eating the bugs, and that's what AI is going to allow. Speaker 1: In your research, how then do we best counter the the looming AI threat from these contrologarchs? Speaker 10: Well, the first step is you gotta be aware of this, and you gotta be aware of their blueprint. I mean, sunlight is the best disinfectant. Something that gives me hope in all of this is that keep more and more people are craving authenticity. As you see these AI thing, I mean, it's really cool that some of the videos you'll see online of what people are able to do with AI and making videos that look super real, but aren't. But then you see you can get down into the comment sections, and you see more and more people saying this is gross. This is creepy. It's the same thing with the fake foods. Something that gives me hope is, you know, they're not extremely popular, which is why they have to ban cows, and Ireland is headed towards slaughtering the cows. So as more more people become aware of what's going on, spread the word, shine the disinfecting light of sunlight on these agendas, that does give me hope. And, you know, nobody's gonna wanna live in a pod eating bugs. The question is once you're out of work and given a meager basic income of $30,000, are you going to be able to do anything about it? And that's why we need to act right now. Speaker 1: So your book Controllogarcs, set quote, rips back the curtain on never before published revelations. What are some of the craziest and most important revelations that our audience would not have heard before? Speaker 10: Well, I just published a piece on Breitbart today. It it might be the way he's lead story still, and this is about the the control guards profiting from abortion. I mean, right now, the supreme court is weighing whether or not to invalidate the FDA approval of a drug called mifepristone. It's also known as r u four eight six. And this is I mean, this thing is really a a sickening drug, and it shocked me when I found out that it's the most common method of abortion. Now you don't have to be pro life to find it sort of grotesque that people like George Soros and Warren Buffett are profiting and and setting up secret shell companies in the Cayman Islands in order to receive profits from chemical induced abortions. So that that drug, Texas was the great state of Texas was the one to sue the FDA last November saying that the Clinton era approval of this drug was totally crooked. And in the book, I actually document how just how crooked this was. It was the Rockefeller Foundation in partnership with a few other contrologarchs who brought this drug from a German company whose roots were in Nazi Germany. IG Farben's successor entity is called Huxde G. Huckst developed this drug that kills infants en masse or kills the new, I guess, fetuses en masse. And, you know, the you use tax exempt resources. This is what the Rockefeller Foundation does. They use tax exempt resources in partnerships with the government and the Clinton administration to bring this drug to market. Now it turns out that this is actually one of the most painful ways of having an abortion for a woman. And then you've got billionaires profiting from it. So I thought that was pretty pretty grotesque. You know, the a lot of the world economic forum stuff has been talked about. Yuval Noah Harari. I know you've talked about him a lot on the show. But just some of the some of the things that they are pouring billions of dollars into, whether the AI and the Neuralink type companies, microchips, brain microchips, with the test subjects being animals for now. I mean, actually, FDA just approved Neuralink for human trials. I thought this was all conspiracy theory stuff, microchips in brains. It's real. It's happening. Over 10,000 people have received microchips in their brains to ostensibly the the thin edge of the wedge is, to cure paralysis. But, of course, in the hype videos, it's like psychic text messaging and ultimately, like, VR porn, I guess, beamed directly into your brain stem. That kind of was shocking. And, it sounds like conspiracy theory stuff, but just go look at the videos on their websites. I mean, this is what they're trying to bring about. I mean, the founder of the Oculus Rift, is trying to make nerve implants to make VR porn more realistic. Zuckerberg has got patents, and patents is a huge theme in the book. I mean, that's what it's all about is patents equal profit. Zuckerberg's patenting things like Nu Skin and haptic suits so that when you're living in a virtual world, can you know, it's like Ready Player One type stuff. So it used to be dystopian future science fiction. It's all here. It's all now, and it's pretty shocking stuff. Speaker 1: So to reemphasize the abortion pill. Welcome back, everybody. Email us freedom@freedomcharleykirk.com and subscribe to our podcast. Joining us now is one of my favorite guests, Heather McDonald. Heather, welcome back to the program. I want everyone to check out When Race Trumps Merit. So Heather, there's been several stories. Haley Biden carjacked in DC, eight teenagers charged with murder in Las Vegas of a young white man, San Francisco that's cleaning up all the streets for Xi, which is a separate issue in some way, but we see we see all these different stories and we're getting more and more emails. Do you think that white America is starting to wake up, that there is a multidimensional, multi institutional war against white people in this country? Speaker 16: Well, we haven't figured out a language yet to really talk about it, Charlie, that will be acceptable to even many conservative ears. But I certainly hear that from students. I was at the University of Virginia last week, and a young student that I was speaking with said that there is a growing awareness among young people, especially for white males, that they are absolutely pariahs in our society. They are going to be the last admitted to schools, excuse me, the last fired, the first fired. And so it is a reality, and it is a reality that is absolutely denied by the entirety of of our mainstream society and by many conservatives. But we need to keep pointing this out because there is no grounds whatsoever for European the inheritors of European civilization to cancel it. Now those inheritors may be people of all different colors, but the the people that are under attack are the Caucasian inheritors of that civilization. And at this point in world history, we have nothing to apologize for because any violations of human rights, and human rights is, of course, exclusively a European Western concept, violations of those rights, whether it's American slavery or imperial atrocities, pale in comparison to every other civilization's ongoing atrocities and violence. Speaker 1: So Heather, I mean, another example, at Louisiana Tech, a black student stabbing for white women is just another story that has happened. I do think that there is a greater and greater understanding and agreement that the laws, the enforcement laws, the lack of media coverage, it's almost fashionable to hate white people. Now, I guess the next question is, Heather, what next? Would it be helpful for, you know, white people or white America to recognize and realize this and talk about this more? Because anytime we notice it, it's the amazing phrase from Michael Anton. It's not happening, but it's good that it is. Like, we're not allowed to even notice it. Your thoughts, Heather McDonald. Speaker 16: It's not just fashionable to hate white people. It's presidential. You know, we have a president now who goes around at every opportunity, staying the preposterous lie that white supremacy is the biggest threat in this country. And and let's just let's just get the facts out there, Charlie, yet again because this is so completely denied by the media that amplifies the Biden message of white supremacy. If you look at all interracial violence between blacks and whites and whites and blacks, blacks commit 87% of all interracial attacks between blacks and whites and whites and blacks. A black is 35 times more likely to commit an act of violence against a white person than vice versa. And we see it, you know, the the few times when you get the videos and you get either the names that reveal that it's a black perpetrator because of the pseudo Africanist names. We see this happening, and yet we're in an absolute state of denial. So what it's gonna take, what sort of politician or leader to articulate that reality, it it remains a a very, very touchy thing. I mean, I can feel it when I go on, you know, what is, for us, the mainstream media, which is Fox News. If you use white in any other context than one of opprobrium, you really are asking to be called a racist by fellow conservatives. And that is preposterous because to say that whites are under attack is not to attack blacks per se. It is to notice the facts, the averages. Of course, there are millions of blacks who are law abiding, who don't want to be treated as perpetual victims and wards of the state. But on average, there is a pathological inner city culture that is creating dysfunction. You have now what's going on, a race hustle on the part of too many Black leaders where they can simply play upon white guilt and claim that it is an accomplishment in itself to be Black. You have the possibility now of specializing in being black just as I could specialize in being female, or gays can specialize in being gay. And that's the one accomplishment that nobody can compete with you And and and it gives you enormous power over the absolute pariahs of straight white males. Speaker 1: And yet we're told that racism is the biggest problem. What what could actually break the matrix, and I don't know if you agree, Heather, I think that it's probably fifty fifty. I don't think every black believes that racism is the biggest problem. I think some have convinced themselves of that, but I think deep down a lot of great Black Americans, they know that there are other problems. Like you said, the pathologies that are put into their culture, right? What is considered to be acceptable? Not staying with the women that you impregnate, so on and so forth. Instead of telling black Americans that they could be great by doing great noble things, we have this self esteem cult of like black girl magic. You're magical because of whatever. It's toxic. And of course, there are tons of problems in urban America and it continues, to this day. Let's just play this this this tape that just went viral here. Play 71. But of course, racism is the problem. Play cut 71. Speaker 10: On my butter. We do it. Don't play my slide on post play. It will get like that. No. No. No. No. Switches right here. And I picked up That's just enough right there. That's enough. +1, 23. That's enough. Yeah. Speaker 1: It's I don't know if you saw that video, Heather. It's such a mystery why there are so many murders in the inner city. So Heather, go through the numbers because I think what percentage of murders are committed by black men in the country? You know, crime, is it is it proportional to their population? Speaker 16: Oh, no. It's it's vastly disproportional. Blacks commit about 66% of all violent crime in the country, at least in the 75 largest counties, which is where most of the population resides. Though they're 15% of the population in those 75 largest counties, they commit well over half of all murders. It's it's so disproportionate. It's far more disproportionate than their number in the prison population where they're a third of the prison population. In fact, studies have shown that blacks are less likely to be convicted of felonies, whether because prosecutors just aren't coming down as hard or they've got sympathetic juries. But at at a third of the prison population, that's actually much less than you would expect from blacks involvement in violent crime. But that video is absolutely classic, Charlie. We've seen those videos. The police see those videos all the time. You know, we're supposed to believe that that the problem with these black kids is that they're too poor. They don't have any opportunities as the mayor of Chicago, Brandon Johnson, has said to justify the the flash mobs, marauding magnificent mile beating up on white tourists. The fact of the matter is blacks are posting inner city kids post videos like that from their smartphones all the time showing off their showing off their money. The social media is the police's best friend because it helps them solve these gang ties. Any kid that has a smartphone is not economically deprived. That kid is richer in resources than than Louis the fourteenth ever was. But we have Speaker 1: That turned is our such a good point. That is so correct. Yes. That's a great point. Speaker 9: Turn our eyes to see Speaker 16: because we can't look at it any longer. In the nineties, we were talking about rap music. We were talking about the cop hatred, the misogyny, the homophobia. We were disturbed by it. Now we don't even talk about it. We simply blame ourselves and and feel like it is somehow a violation of racial etiquette to mention these pathologies. And there's pathologies in the white underclass as well. Let's be perfectly clear. But this Charlie, it is so urgent for whites to stop caving into the race hustle because whites Speaker 1: Okay. I think we need to fix Heather's connection. I I wish we could have finished that sentence. We'll fix that connection in a second. Ruff Greens and by the way, let's just summarize it. This is this is so simple. Get married, get a job, graduate high school, don't commit crimes. Period. Ruffgreens.com. You've heard me talk about Ruff Greens and how it's helping dogs. You gotta check out dog food is dead food. Ruff Greens has essential vitamins and minerals, omega oils, digestive enzymes, probiotics, and plenty of antioxidants. Get your free jump start trial bag. All you have to do is cover the shipping. Check it out right now. Roughgreens.com/kirk. That is ruffgreens.com/kirk. You don't have to change your dog's food. Just add a small scoop of rough greens every single day. Has omega oils, digestive enzymes, probiotics. It's incredible. If you have a dog, you've got to check out ruffgreens.com/kirk. That is ruffgreens.com/kirk. Ruffgreens.com/kirk. Check it out right now. Ruffgreens.com/kirk. Heather McDonald continues after the break. She's amazing. Check out her book. It's very, very important. When race trumps merit. More after the break. People ask me everywhere I travel about StrongCell. Charlie, is StrongCell legit? Charlie, do you really believe in the antiaging properties of NADH? Charlie, is this product worth the price? My answer is the same to all of their questions. Yes, yes, and yes. I'm a huge believer in this approach to health and wellness. StrongCell is a scientific breakthrough in cellular health replenishment that combines NADH, co q ten, and marine collagen to boost your body's cellular function. I personally take strong cell every day, and so do a ton of our Kirk listeners. Go see the reviews for yourself. If you are someone who relies on caffeine or sugar just to keep yourself going, then you have to give StrongCell a try. I only have one important request of you. I recommend this life changing product, but you have to give it at least four weeks to realize the best results. It takes a little time to reengineer your body's NADH. Think about it. It's been on the decline for quite a while, and in some cases, for decades. First step, go to strongcell.com/charlie today. That's strongsell.com/charlie and read the personal testimonials for yourself. Then use promo code Charlie to get a special 20% discount on your order. Again, that's strongsell.com/charlie, and don't forget your 20% discount by using promo code Charlie at checkout. Covered a lot. Zuckerberg, Bezos not as much. Who remember, he owns the Washington Post and his ex wife, Mackenzie, like you said, she's worth $35,000,000,000 and she's just spending money like it's going out of style on left wing politics. And then you have Soros. Soros out of the five out of the six no. Out of the five. Out of the five is the most notorious to try to reshape western society. What do what have you discovered about George Soros that you feel does not get enough attention? Speaker 10: Well, you know, there's a question of whether the George Soros would even laugh, and should he be on the cover, would he be alive? He's 93 years old. And so I wanted to see who the next Soros is, and that's Alexander Soros. Of course, George Soros has multiple children. Each one of them funds radical left wing causes. And, unfortunately, his $25,000,000,000 empire is passed in the hands of Alexander Soros, who is much more radical than he is, his father that is his father. Alex Alex Soros has said he wants to use this $25,000,000,000 empire to fund abortion. And, I mean, it obviously calls it women's rights and reproductive health. They all use sort of these euphemisms for the mass extermination of fetuses. But so and and, of course, elections are you know, if Alex Soros lives to the age of his father, our elections are not safe for the next fifty years. Speaker 1: Yeah. The the entire Soros cabal and cartel Soros cabal and cartel is gonna have billions and billions and billions of dollars. Alexander Source, by the way, is more political than the other. I love this clip here. So here you have Bill Gates who wants to be in charge of your childhood vaccinations, food, and health. Play cut 60. Speaker 17: Out there distributing health advice that have a giant hole in their health game. Speaker 11: Yeah. Absolutely. Speaker 17: Like, Bill Gates is a great example of that. He's got this big fat belly, and he's telling people they have to get vaccinated. Like, this kind of binary thinking, this kind of ridiculous way of looking at the world through only pharmacological interventions, through only medicine, through only this, through only that. There's so many different things that you have to do to be healthy. Speaker 1: Yeah. The the the best part of the tape is actually when Rogan just roasts him for for other, physical attributes. Check out the book Controllogarcs. Seamus will continue, after the breakup. Seamus Brunner continues with us. So, Seamus, what piece of research are here in the book that we didn't talk about? Do you wanna make sure our audience is aware of? Just plug your book, Controllogarcs. Speaker 10: I think my favorite chapter was the dystopian present chapter, and that's the one that's all about Speaker 1: Welcome back, everybody. Email us freedom@charliekirk.com and subscribe to our podcast. Make sure you get involved with Turning Point USA. We're getting we're getting Heather MacDonald back. I wanna play this piece of tape. There's several pieces of tape. Let's play cut one eighteen. This, has gone viral, millions of views of a kid's birthday party, and the kids are celebrating with firearms. I wonder if they're loaded. The parents are on board with this. It is a black culture problem, everybody. You know who the first person to say that is? Brandon Tatum. Candace Owens. It's not racism. It's not white supremacy. I'm sorry. This is a this is a major problem. This is a kid's birthday party of six and seven year olds dancing around with handguns. Play cut one eighteen, please. Yeah. But racism is the problem. Right? White supremacy is the greatest threat to the American homeland. And you know what's really sick? And I don't delight in this. That Is some of those kids are probably gonna get killed in a crossfire. First of all, just that that's again just like rule number one, that's against like every rule of how you handle a firearm. Okay? So that that alone should just bother you. Okay? Secondly, you're letting eight year olds dance around with guns? Spare me the lecture that it's white people's fault. Heather McDonald continues. Heather, sorry for the tech issues. You were finishing I don't know if you remember the thought that you were on, but it was important. Do you wanna just summarize what you're talking about? We can go from there. Speaker 16: Well, yes, there's something that white people can do at this point. We get asked all the time to join these well, what can we do to close the academic skills gap? And I say, the we that you're referring to cannot do anything more. The we that you're referring has been trying for five cost of trillions of dollars of transfer. Speaker 1: Sorry. Sorry. The the the tech the tech just is not there today. Maybe we'll be able to fix it. What I think Heather was saying is that the we you're referring to have done far enough. I wanna play this piece of tape. I don't know if we have my answer to it, but this is important. Some of the biggest pushers of white supremacy being the problem are white people. It is self loathing. By far, the most pushers are white people. I would say there's plenty Al Sharpton and all of are there, but okay. Well, that's fine. Blake is contributing. I'll I'll read what he has to say in a second. Blake got one nineteen. Speaker 18: You you made a claim that the family is the bedrock of a civilized society or a productive society. How do you define a family? Because in the February that humans have existed on this planet, the nuclear family where you had where you had a single breadwinner, 2.6 children at a white picket fence is barely a 100 years old. It's a post war phenomena based on on the wealth after World War two. So would you consider a family, a same sex couple, for example, a legitimate family that provides us bedrock for society. And also, you know, we can also remember that interracial families were once illegal as well, you know, so the idea of a family has changed in human history. It used to be extended. Anyway Speaker 1: That's not that's not the tape I wanted, but the the dialogue goes on for him mentioning that blacks are treated terribly later in the discussion in the criminal justice system. And my answer is, stop committing crimes. I think a lot of people are waking up because we the the culture, not us, the culture way overplayed their hand when it came to racism being the problem, white supremacy. And I think when you start to see videos like that kid's birthday party and the graduation of blacks waving around guns, like, yeah, time out. Enough blame, Whitey. In fact, we have one of our most viral clips at NAU where a black student says, well, isn't it white people's fault? Like, why is it white people's fault that black men don't stay with the women that they impregnate? How is that my fault or the white race's fault? How is that white supremacy's fault? The answer and by the way, just so we're clear, 70 plus percent. So ish, depends on what city, but it's right around 75%. So about one in four ish, but we'll round down. 70% of black men abandon the women they impregnate. White people are not to blame for that. Candace Owens joins us next. Speaker 10: Purchases products and sell them to us cheap Chinese goods, just for money and that, you know, all that all of our businesses and the hollowing out of our manufacturing sector, it was all just about money. That's not the case. The people in this book like the Chinese model. They like this state run, capitalism model where, you know, a few select corporations can really make it rich while the rest of the people, if there's any dissent, instantly clamped down on, instantly disappeared. I mean, you see it with the COVID. You saw it with the COVID lockdowns. That was modeled after China's zero COVID policy. And even after China's zero COVID policy was shown to be an absolute failure, I mean, when you saw Shanghai residents locked down for days or weeks at a time, even after the the zero COVID policy was a failure, you still see these guys like Bill Gates advocating for lockdowns. And so the sort of collusion between Bill Gates and Anthony Fauci and both of their favor towards China, that's a huge problem. The social credit score is what I believe the end game is. I think the book shows that they're supporting millions and billions of dollars into digital ID efforts. Just last week, Bill Gates and the United Nations and the Rockefeller Foundation hosted an event called fifty in fifty, how 50 countries within five years are going to be rolling out these digital ID regimes, the central bank digital currencies. You know, these all sound like conspiracy type terms, but I know you know, Charlie, I know your audience is smart. They know that these are full speed ahead. The Atlantic Council also last week said that DBDCs are maintaining momentum, strong momentum through into 2024. The Fed is working on CBDC. The World Bank and the Bank of International Settlements love the idea of a global CBDC. You know, that the CBDC combined with the digital ID, combined with the information control is like game over. Speaker 1: One minute, Seamus. With your research, what is their vulnerability? What is their weak spot? Speaker 10: Well, it's it's We The People. We need to band together. If you're not doing something to counteract this force that is being exerted upon you, you need to, at the very least, spread the word. Our founders were right that, you know, that's why shows like yours are important. Getting the information out there, even, you know, just liking and subscribing and sharing, as dumb as that may sound, really is important and and evangelizing to your relatives and being you know, it's hard if you don't have the facts and you try to go to Thanksgiving dinner and convince your liberal uncle Larry of something, you know, you're not gonna make much headway. You gotta have the facts and the figures, then you'll, you know, talk to him and ask him what he thinks and ask him to explain his position. You'll find nine out of 10 times they really can't. So we do have an advantage with the fact that the truth is on our side. And the one the other thing that I would say we need to do is correct the imbalance. I mean, the left is just like you know, people like George Soros, though it's like an endless ATM for left wing causes, and there are Endless. Great conservative pay Yeah. Speaker 1: Gotta run. Speaker 10: Great conservative donors. We need more. Speaker 1: Seamus Brunner, excellent work. Controllogarchs, thank you so much. Everyone check it out. Joining us now is James Lawrence, attorney for the Legal Defense Fund for Douglas Mackie. James, thank you for taking the time. James, our audience is familiar, with this story and with what's happening, with mister Mackie. Just give us an update. How is Douglas doing personally? Speaker 19: Thanks again, Charlie, for having me on to discuss this case. So to get your audience up to speed, on October 18, the federal district court judge in Brooklyn, New York sentenced mister Mackey to serve seven months in prison for violating federal law under allegedly under 18 USC two forty one. So seven months in prison, which will start in January. So he was ordered to report to prison in January. And then importantly for your audience to know, he asked for the sentence to be stayed pending appeal. So his legal team right now is in the process of appealing the conviction to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals. And so his defense asked for the district court judge to allow the appeal to go forward and for his sentence not to start until all appellate options had been exhausted. The judge denied that request and ordered him to report for the start of his sentence beginning in January. And another point for your audience to be aware of, again, send us on October 18. On October 17 Speaker 6: The voice of generations is the Charlie Kirk Show. Speaker 1: Okay, everybody. Welcome back. Just briefly, Noble Gold Investments. Check it out. I'll tell you more about this later, but Noble Gold is seeing a huge investment of gold buyers from billionaires to multimillionaires to institutional investors. The people who are not afraid are those that invest in gold from Noble Gold Investments. That's noblegoldinvestments.com. Use promo code Charlie to bag a free five ounce America to beat up a coin with each gold or silver IRA. If you qualify, that's noblegoldinvestments.com. Joining us now is the great Candace Owens. Candace is forty weeks pregnant, everybody. So she might have to leave at any moment's notice. Thank you for taking the time. Candace, had a viral interview with Tucker yesterday, but after that or right as the interview was posted, Ben Shapiro tweeted at a Bible verse that you tweeted, which I found to be totally out of line and kind of triggered this massive Internet dispute, and he effectively asked you to resign from the Daily Wire. Candace, what is going on here? Speaker 9: Well, first, I just wanna say that I think people thought it was like all of this was like suspicious timing and that there's no conspiracy theory here. First and foremost, I had signed Donovan Tucker weeks ago. So this interview was already planned. And then obviously, the night before the video of Ben saying some remarks about me went viral. And then minutes before my Tucker interview aired, he did tweet that and I haven't yet gotten any clarity on what the significance of that tweet was. Me posting the Bible passes was just basically me calling for peace and accepting you know, the things that you can't change. And I definitely have had a very peaceful, happy end of pregnancy. And so I didn't and still don't really understand the nature of the tweet, but I did feel compelled in this instance to answer more strongly because it was a biblical passage. And I have said for a very long time that it does feel like Christians are always being told to shut up. And when you share just a biblical passage and it's somehow being construed or being told that there's something wrong with this passage, it was important for me as a Christian to defend our faith. Speaker 1: Yeah. Totally. So this has kind of been simmering for a couple of weeks. So just by background, Ben at a private event spoke to a group of people, and I wanna make sure I'm very clear and specific. He said something on the lines of you have faux sophistication on the matter, Candace. That was his quote. What is he talking about here? I mean, I follow you on social media. I'm a very pro Israel person. Right? I get accused of being a Jewish shill on a daily basis. Like, what what is Ben talking about here? And then secondly, why of all the tweets that he decided to ask you to resign, did he choose a bible verse? Speaker 9: Charlie, you your questions are the same questions that I have. I what what I have said on Tucker and what I will say here is that I think a lot of people who are emotionally involved in the conflict overseas are perceiving people that are actually moderate as radical. And they're not able to see that maintaining a level head is okay. And I think that when they have the benefit of hindsight and it's 2020, they're going to maybe regret some of the things that they've especially amongst their most fervent to to their most fervent allies and supporters, which is why on Tucker, I even brought up the concept of the attacks that have been constant against you. And if it's it's sort of like if you don't veer into radicalism right now, then they take everything. There's an extreme sensitivity there, you know? And every comment that you make, and I can correlate this two weeks ago when I was quite literally, I I sent two tweets back to back about Brian Mast and his comments in in congress being wrong as somebody that is a citizen congressman about saying there's no such thing as innocent civilian life. And then I followed it up by saying, you know, any sort of genocidal language is wrong no matter what government's coming from. I was referring to the American government, And the backlash that I got for saying genocide is always wrong, it's bonkers. I still can't comprehend it. It's such an easy statement for everyone to agree with. Every single person should have said, amen, amen, yes, agree. Genocide is always wrong and unjustifiable. And yet people read in between the lines and said that this must be you're saying this is happening, and it's like, no. But people, that is literally you applying your emotion, and it's utterly illogical. And I think we are living in times right now where it's really scary to see how much emotion people are having, that basic statements. And if I tweeted right now, pedophilia, no matter where it happens in in the world, is always wrong. Is that a statement at certain times okay? Is that statement at certain times not? So I have been trying to understand really what's going on, and the only thing that I can come up with is that people are highly emotional and they're not thinking straight right now. Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah. That that's that's an eternal statement. Right? It's it's true regardless of what's happening. I I wanna just reinforce this because you bring up a really important point. And for the record, I've always gotten along well with Ben. I've known Jeremy for a long time, but I I call balls and strikes where I see it. And, Candace, I think it's been super unfair the way some people have been treating you and and really unfair because look. I know your heart too. I I tweeted this yesterday. Candace Owens flew eighteen hours through a brutal European connection to go to the embassy opening in Jerusalem, and we toured Israel together. And you you and I were on campuses multiple times together defending Israel and defending the Jewish people. And so I just find a lot of the coverage to be, you know, vitten not a lot, but but some people's chattering has been highly emotional. And so let's just you talked about this in the Tucker interview, Candice. If somebody in the audience is a very pro Israel person, can you bring them up to speed as how their cause is actually weakening by how they are going after allies? And I'm afraid that they are diluting and cheapening the term antisemitism the same way they've done with racism. Speaker 9: There's no question that they've diluted it. People are not even blinking now to be called an antisemite because, you know, when you start with Richard Spencer and you end with Charlie Kirk and you say everybody's an antisemite and everybody's trafficking in antisemitic tropes, you've just lost the plot. I mean, it's in everybody from Joe Rogan to Tucker Carlson last night for God knows what reason being called an anti Semite, and it's it's just completely a losing argument. And so it's funny because I've had some, you know, pro Israel friends that reached out to me and were saying, well, we're just trying to help you. And this time I asserted myself and I said, you need to listen to me. It's obvious to everybody that's looking around right now that there has been a loss in support for Israel, and that's not because any person agrees with what happened on October 7. We have all said on our platforms multiple times that what happened on October 7 is completely abhorrent, but it has a lot to do with the reaction of going after allies for asking questions, for trying to remain not neutral, but humane throughout this and saying that it is always sad. Like people were upset when I said it's always sad when you see a dead child. And some of the upset said, well, can't say that unless you say that also they were just being used as human shields. It's no, you can feel sympathy, you can feel empathy for individuals always, no matter what is going on. You don't need to gauge or jump into a political debate to acknowledge that you're still a human and you have a human response to seeing a dead child. And so what I have said from the very actually, before any of this on my show, is that when you use terms too much and you refer to everybody as something, whether it is a racist, a sexist, a homophobe, you will then find that those words have no power. And I do think that part of the frustration that some people that are parishial are having is trying to understand why this word has no power anymore. And I can explain it over and over, but I can't help people understand it. You saw it happen with Black Lives Matter. First, people were so scared of being called a racist. It was such a horrible smear, horrible libel, like what do I do to not be called that? And then as they started calling everything racist, you started realizing air was racist. And the CNN articles were saying, you know, white people blinking was racist. It became, okay, now we know that this word actually doesn't mean what you're saying, it just means that you want me to submit to whatever it is that you're saying very easily because you've used a smear. You've called me a holocaust snire, you've called me an anti Semite, You've said my silence is violence. And actually what you're trying to do is you're trying to assert control over me while claiming that you are the victim in this. But actually you're trying to assert power over me. And that's not the way to do it. You have to be well intended. And Dennis Prager has always made that point, by the way, for years and years that you have to be very careful when you use a word like that because it will lose power very fast. And unfortunately, his warnings were not heated in this circumstance and people are just don't believe it when you when things people are being called anti Semitic anymore. Speaker 1: Dennis warned us about this. He said an attack used too much loses its power. And you and I both Right. Were kind of we we both still consider Dennis a great friend and a great teacher. And Dennis says he's very careful using that label. He said, because I we want it when we need it, when there's a legit antisemite. And throwing it around as a thought terminating cliche or a means of control or hyper emotional does no one a good service. So so, Candace, let me ask you, because not everyone listens to your show, which is excellent. Everyone should subscribe to her show. There there's a lot of not not a lot. There's a fair amount of rumor or mystery of what you stand on on the war. Can you just the floor is yours. What do you what is your position? Because I think people are completely misinterpreting your views of the Jewish people of what's happening in Israel. Just explain to our audience just to kinda cut off the rumors at the pass. Speaker 9: Yeah. Thank you so much for asking, and and that's what I've said is nobody even asks anymore. And then when you give them an answer and you say, I've said this on my show multiple times, then they say to you, well, I don't listen to your show and, you know, you should tweet it. I'm like, well, my show is posted the full show is posted on Twitter every single day. Oh, well, I don't follow this account. So it becomes not about whether or not what you said or what you didn't say, it becomes about whether or not they were on Twitter at the moment and saw what you said. Otherwise, it doesn't count. You know? And so that's been very interesting. And again, a way to assert power and control and to say that you need to say it when I am online and on whether it's Instagram or Facebook or Twitter. I if I didn't see it, it didn't actually happen, which is completely foolish. But I have not shifted my views at all at at all when it comes to Israel and Palestine, whether it is Ukraine or Russia, whether it is Afghanistan. America has issues at home. We do not need to be sending more money overseas. It is the perspective that is held by Thomas Massey, is now being harassed and being called an anti Semite for his consistent voting against sending any dollar overseas throughout his entire career, right? He has not changed, he has not switched up, so this is not something that is being guided by a hatred or a love of people based on their race at all. It is just my policy, my stance is that America is falling apart. The politicians that are opining on stage and saying, well, we can do both. Look around you, obviously we can't. America is in steep decline educationally, socially, and morally. And I have also been clear that I understand the sentiments coming from white Americans that are saying, why are we suddenly being told now to care about the university debacle? Well, we have been calling this out for years. And Charlie, the you're perfect person to speak about this. You and I have traversed universities. We have been drowned out. We have been harassed. We have been chased out of restaurants for our ideas That's correct. As conservatives, and nobody cared. We couldn't get people to stop funding these universities. We could not get people to understand how bad the problem had become when you actually had professors, forget the students that were protesting, you had professors that were tweeting, all I want for Christmas is a white genocide. I believe that was at Drexel University in Pennsylvania, and that faculty member was protected, calling openly for genocide of white people. So it is a fair question. It is a fair critique when people say, why are you telling us this is a problem now? And this has a problem that many of us have been fighting for the last decade, and it seemed like nobody cared. And so by being fair in that assessment, by recognizing what white people have gone through in this country, by recognizing this, what I consider myself to be America first stances of the problems that are happening in this country, And by saying that I do not want to be involved in another Middle Eastern conflict, no matter where the stage is. People hear that in this moment as some form of antisemitism. It's not. It's consistency. It is the reason that I quoted Thomas Sowell on last night's episode that he has a quote about the civil rights era. He's referring to black America in this quote, but saying, when people are used to special treatment, sometimes being treated the same can feel like discrimination. And it's not discrimination to say that the obvious truths that we are facing in this nation. You can debate that academically, but don't be disingenuous and call people anti Semites for holding the same decisions that they have always held for the last decade. Speaker 1: Yeah. Your position has large agreement in many political circles. By the way, it's also held by people from Thomas Massey to Dennis Kucinich to Rand Paul to a certain extent. And you can have dis disagreements without having to throw around some of those vile labels imaginable. Candace, we're gonna continue after the break. Subscribe to the Candace Owens podcast. Candace is special. We have her back a 100%. And let's just take a pause. What's really going on here? That's what we're gonna talk about after the break. Email is freedom@CharlieKirk.com. Speaker 19: My wife gave birth to the couple's first child, and Doug couldn't be there, Charlie. He was not present at the birth of his first child because he he was in federal district court the following day in New York City awaiting awaiting sentencing. It's just another aspect of this case that's heart wrenching and troubling on every level. We've talked about it previously. The First Amendment problem. The Fifth Amendment problem, and with respect to the conduct of the trial itself, the Sixth Amendment problem. And then you compound all of those constitutional issues, which are profound and downright disturbing, and add on top of that the personal impact of missing the birth of your firstborn child and compounded with, hey. You're gonna have to report to prison in January. So that's the latest. Speaker 1: So in in American history, James, has someone been sentenced to federal prison for a speech crime such as this in the history of the republic? Speaker 19: Well, this is this is the first prosecution of its kind, Charlie, under 18 USC two forty one. And, this was a statute that was passed in 1871. It was aimed at preventing the Klan from exercising power and intimidating African Americans and who were who were newly emancipated from slavery. No such prosecution has been brought in the history of our country under that statute. Now, I mean, can can speech provide a, a predicate basis for criminal liability in other contexts? Yes. But it's we've maintained in court filings. This is Speaker 6: Waking up the woke. Speaker 5: Oh, you should get over that quickly. Speaker 6: One brainwashed radical at a time. Speaker 1: That's enough. Speaker 6: It's the Charlie Kirk show. Speaker 1: Preserving liberty means more to me than anything else. You see, we're a very important time in our nation's history. You look around in this room. Don't give me this nonsense that Americans are giving up. That is not true. Okay. America Fest. That's amfest.com. Get your tickets right now. Amfest.com. Biggest speakers in the whole movement, Tucker Carlson and many others. We continue with Candace Owens in just a second. Alright. Candace Owens continues with us. Candace, I'm I'm curious. Has Ben Shapiro called you privately to try to fix this, or is this all just been a public dispute? Speaker 9: It's all been public. I'm I've been, you know, very surprised by it. It's like I said on Tucker last night, something that I think is unfairly a blemish to the Daily Wire because, you know, the four of us, other hosts that work here at the Nashville campus are, we get along very well, you know, and I think that this looks like something that it's not because Ben is not a part of the day to day operations. And I'm not sure why his instinct is always to air something publicly. You know, Charlie, you and I worked for years together. We have had so many disagreements. I would call you, text you directly, yell at you, you know, that's that's healthy, you know? But I I would never just throw out a random tweet and expect you to see it when we were having any of those disagreements. When people text me and say, disagree with Charlie on this, I will just text you, like now up until this day. You know, what did you mean by this? Why are you doing this? Yes. We have to be able to have healthy dialogue and healthy instinct even when we are not understanding each other. Doesn't make it better to let things become public fodder. And it's why I did not want to meet Ben where he was at in engaging anything that was disparaging about him. Because look, I'm 34 years old, I have my third kid on the way. I know how to communicate like an adult. And so, yeah, I don't still yet fully understand where he is coming from. And I do think that we have all tried to be exceedingly understanding of his emotions during this time, as somebody who has familial ties to Israel. And understanding that over the last five weeks, it's been a very emotional time for him. And that's, you know, the human place that I have tried oops. Sorry. Dropped something there. The, you know, the human angle that I have tried to take in trying to perhaps understand why he is airing some of this publicly. Speaker 1: Yeah. Look. I I as I said, I've known known Ben for a long time. I hope he fixes that because leadership should not leadership should warrant the tough conversation and to do it in private. It's by way, it's not good for the movement. It's not good for the Daily Wire. We need the Daily Wire. Need the Daily Wire strong. It's an important company. Those amazing things. Walsh knows Knowles, Jordan, yourself, all that good stuff. So, Candace, fine. Just a couple minutes remaining here. This Israel issue, I'm afraid, is breaking both the left and the right simultaneously in different ways. What can we do to make sure that doesn't happen? On the right. The left can they can go to hell. Speaker 19: On the right. Speaker 9: Well, we need to act like conservatives. We need to practice what we preach. We talk about free speech. We can't suddenly buck the trend of free speech because we're angry or we're upset. We talk about the need for more dialogue. We talk about the need for less libel. We talk about the need for less smears in the media. We cannot engage in that. We can't engage in the behavior of left ists just because we have become upset or an issue is close to us. Consistency is what is called upon. We must remain ideologically consistent. I think it's important to call balls and strikes within our own movement, but and I think that that's part of the problem is that many people are not, as I've spent our calls in behaving with consistently conservative principles on these matters. And I'm seeing a lot of behavior that mimics BLM right now. And that is going to, without question, cause a fracturing in the movement by people that are well intended. And look, I think that we were all way already sensing this sort of civil war in the conservative movement. And I think that's best represented by the very different perspectives that even the candidates that are running have. Are we America first? Do we believe that we should be engaging in overseas conflict all the time nonstop? We are, I think, as Vivek Ramaswamy said, going through this sort of adolescence period of trying to define what the conservative party is. And I I think it's changing. I think Trump was a huge part of that sea change, obviously, and and realizing that there's a frustration. I think younger conservatives feel a little disconnected and detached from some of the older conservatives in the movement for certain reasons that have become accustomed to military, industrial complex instincts, and constantly saying that our allegiance somehow be overseas, and they become accustomed to constantly being involved in overseas complex. And I think that we want something different. And the first thing that we want that is something different is healthy debate, and demanding healthy debate. Demanding full throated discussions and not emotional responses no matter what happens. Whether Russia invades Ukraine, we deserve a full throated debate about whether or not we should be sending billions of dollars unaccounted for over to Zelenskyy. And whether or not it's COVID policy, no matter how fearful people are, we deserve to have a full throttle debate about how we live in a COVID era. Do we still have our freedoms or do we become people that are suddenly authoritarian because we have fears? That is the future of the Republican Party that I want to see, is are people that can look back and say, whether you agreed with me or did not agree with me, I remained consistent, and I hope that you respect that. Speaker 1: I'll give some advice. Candace Owens is undefeated, everybody. So be careful fighting Candace Owens. Doesn't end well for you. Candace, God bless. We have your back and have that baby. We'll talk to you soon. Speaker 9: Thank you so much, Charlie. Such a pleasure to always join. Speaker 1: Thank you. Email us freedom@charliekirk.com. Enjoy Jack Passoeck. Third hour coming up. Speaker 19: Justice is contemplating just that. Other prosecutions predicated on the spread of misinformation and disinformation. And, Charlie, as we know from the COVID pandemic, today's misinformation and disinformation and conspiracy can be tomorrow's conventional wisdom. It's a path we can't go down. It's Pandora's box that we can't open. It's been opened in mister Mackey's case, and it has to be shut down on an appeal. And, again, that's why we're asking your audience to go to memedefensefund.com. Speaker 1: Douglas Mackey's case is the basis for the the Smith case against Trump. Same law, they escalate and they elevate. So, James, tell us about that. And by the way, it's memedefensefund.com. This impacts every single every single patriot out there that you could you could be a young man who now is a father. He misses the birth of his son so that these cockroaches, these maniacs, these vermin and swine can bring him in front of a judge to put him in federal prison for seven months, and there are no victims. James, I just want you to reiterate that. Who was victimized by his meme? Tell a bad joke and you go to jail? Speaker 19: Well, Charlie, the the government did not put on, did not forecast before trial and at trial, did not put on a single witness that said, I saw this meme. I was confused. And as a result, I texted my vote and didn't exercise my right to go to the polls or vote by mail or whatever other legal mechanism of voting was available to that person at the time. So not a single person, not a single confused voter who did not get to exercise their right to vote. And yet Douglas Mackie is going to prison for seven months anyway under this ruling and under the verdict unless it's overturned on an appeal, which is again why it's why it's so critical that we had the theory of prosecution at off of the past. And and and another thing for your audience to know, you know, we talk a lot of this country about our democracy, and people make allusions to it that our democracy in the case of former president Trump is under attack in many ways in the ways that he's trying to curtail the influence of the administrative state. It's important for your audience to know that Congress repeatedly considered whether or not to create criminal liability around election misinformation and disinformation. They considered various proposals to do that, and they rejected them. It never passed a proposal like this never passed the House or the Senate and and was signed into law by a duly elected president. And yet Mr. Mackey asked to report to prison in January anyway because the administrative state, the deep state, was able to stretch and contort a statute from 1871 to achieve an outcome that was not politically viable or could not be pushed through the congress. And and and that is really what the regime means when it talks about our democracy. It's not about voting. It's not about elected representatives voting. It's about unelected prosecutors and bureaucrats using statutes to enact its will and impose its will on the American people without votes. Speaker 1: Christina Wong tweeted on 11/08/2016, hey, Trump supporters. Skip poll lines at election two thousand sixteen and text in your vote. Text votes are legit or vote tomorrow on Super Wednesday. Christina Wong is still making jokes, was never investigated or indicted, and Christina Wong continues a living a free life. Meanwhile, Douglas Mackie did the exact same thing, even less blunt, by the way, and he is going to federal prison. The website is memedefensefund.com. Everyone should contribute memedefensefund.com. So James, what is your approach for the appeal going to be? First amendment protections, fifth amendment protections, what will your approach be for appeal? Speaker 19: Well, Doug's appellate team will undoubtedly raise arguments under the first, fifth, and sixth amendments. I mean, as the first amendment issues are are are have been talked about quite a bit. The fifth amendment issues relate to the use of a very vague statute. Again, as I mentioned in the opening segment, this is a law that was passed in 1871. And it is the text of the statute bars conspiracies to injure, quote unquote, to injure individuals in their exercise of protected rights. And so one of the arguments I'm sure his appellate team will make is that the statute itself is impermissibly ambiguous and vague, and attack it on on a void for vagueness challenge under the Fifth Amendment for lack of notice under the due process clause. You know, the Sixth Amendment issues relate to, among other things, mister Mackey's defense not being able to cross examine a confidential government witness who was allowed to testify basically under shield on the nature of that individual's ongoing relationship with the FBI. Under the sixth amendment, criminal defendants have a right to cross examine their accusers in public in open court. And one of the problems among others with this prosecution is that Mr. Mackie didn't get to do that in violation of the Sixth Amendment. And again, this is bedrock stuff. I mean, this goes back to the right to confront your witnesses in in public and open court goes back to sir Walter Raleigh, the the the namesake of my hometown, who was locked away in the Tower Of London precisely because he could not cross examine his witnesses in open court. That's why we have the sixth amendment. Speaker 1: Yeah. No kidding. So and then I mentioned this before the break. Is there an equal protection argument here potentially? I mean, they they don't enforce this against Christina Wong who has obviously did the exact same thing. Speaker 19: Right. No. I that's that's another that's another avenue, for sure is the, selective prosecution. Though defendants, in in many cases, try the that argument. And and certainly, in this case, as you pointed out in the open, you've got similarly situated individuals engaged in similar conduct. But I think that's a that's a harder harder case a harder case to make than than some of the other other arguments. That's just my my impersonal view of it. But Doug's appellate team will will handle all of that. Speaker 1: Yeah. The prosecutorial discretion that we give the federal government, is remarkable. James Lawrence, thank you so much. Memedefensefund.com. Help out Douglas Mackie, a young man going to jail because he told a bad joke. You are living in The Soviet Union. James, thank you so much. Speaker 19: Thank you. Speaker 1: Email us freedom@charliekirk.com and subscribe to our podcast receiving thousands of emails regarding the first hour that we did about this New York Times 2024 poll, but we have election day tomorrow. If you live in Virginia, major election day tomorrow. Play cut one. Speaker 20: We've delivered results, and that's why I'm excited about what's gonna be on the ballot. I think we can hold our house and flip our senate. We can keep going because there's so many more important topics for us to focus on. Speaker 1: There's a huge push in Virginia to turn I think they call it the Virginia House of Delegates. Right? To flip it. Going all in on early voting, going all in on ballot chasing. Could this end up demonstrating and showing a path forward? Glenn Youngkin has a serious favorability rating. Could be a template. Could end up being a blueprint for 02/2024. We're we're about to find out how smart Glenn Youngkin is, by the way. Glenn Youngkin avoiding the 2024 race, he's a smart guy. Unlike Ron DeSantis, he's like, yeah. I don't know if I wanna see myself getting into that. Some people say, oh, do you think he'll be vice president? Trump will never pick a vice president taller than him, so that's probably not gonna happen. And so Glenn Youngkin putting together a a blueprint in Virginia. If he stays out of the presidential race and flips the house of delegates and gets behind Donald Trump, I'll have a lot of respect for that man. So I'm cheering for him. I really like what he's doing. He's doing the tough work. He's focusing on governing in Virginia and avoiding some of the national political chatter. Speaker 6: If you wanna wear three masks outside, then listen to public radio. Speaker 21: Fresh air. Speaker 6: Breathe free. It's the Charlie Kirk show. Speaker 1: Welcome back, everybody. Email is freedom@charliekirk.com. I wanna bring to your attention a very important story here, and we have a great guest to walk us through it. So until September, the FCC, the Federal Communications Commission, which we are regulated by here because we are on we are on AM and FM radio, was balanced with two Republicans and two Democrats. Now that it has a Democrat majority, it's starting to enact a very radical social agenda, everybody. And one such radical step just happened. The FCC just recently adopted a, quote, digital discrimination order on a three two party line vote. So here to speak with us today about this is Republican FCC commissioner Nathan Symington, who was appointed by president Trump back in 02/2020. Mister Symington, thank you so much for joining us. Please tell us all about this. Speaker 7: Absolutely. Thanks for having me on, Charlie. So this item that we just enacted at the commission takes a very short section in the 2020. Speaker 1: K. I I I hate to be dark, but it it really it really is something when the FCC guy's Internet is not very good. Is that is that too soon, Blake? I'm kidding. He's a great this is what net neutrality will get you, everybody. Alright. We're gonna get him back in a second. Boy, we've really had we've had the stars aligning with Internet. Everybody, email us freedom@charliekirk.com. We'll get him back. No. This is really important story. All kidding aside. This is why we can't have net neutrality and actually proves the point. The we we've talked before about how the civil rights act passed back in the sixties and all of these civil rights regime laws that followed the the civil rights era laws, I should say. They could be used as skeleton key. Okay, mister Symington. Sorry about that. I don't know what happened, but welcome back. Thanks. Please continue. Speaker 7: Yeah, big tech at it again. So thanks for having me on, Charlie. So as I was saying, this item take the short section in the 2021 infrastructure bill that consists six and uses it to spin out a sprawling government takeover of the Internet. Actions a second six to five zero six did pass with some Republican vote, but its language was not nearly broad enough to support what the Democratic majority just voted to do with it. I'm sure people would not have voted for it if they knew that this was what would follow it. Speaker 1: Well, so look, the the government taking over the Internet sounds very sinister. So I just wanna be very specific. How is the government taking taking over over the the Internet? Internet? I mean, wanna are they gonna, like, nationalize Google? What are they gonna start taking over? Walk us through this. Speaker 7: Absolutely. Well, when people think about the Internet, they think about the sites and apps that they're using. But there's also a lot of physical infrastructure there, and it's very costly. This So is bad in a different way. It's about taking over the physical side, cell towers, fiber optic cables, servers. The justification is that some low income or minority areas have relatively low amounts of high speed internet. The FCC took just three words from the law preventing digital discrimination and decided that these low levels of internet subscriptions show discrimination by cell phone and internet providers just because they exist. Then the majority goes further and says any difference in service can be discrimination. Does one neighborhood have higher prices? Does one place have slower speeds, outdated equipment? If there's any difference, we can call it discrimination and we can find them whatever we want or order them to build whatever they Speaker 1: So what what would the ramifications of this potentially be? Could the FCC just fine you for providing Internet in a racist way as they deem racist? Speaker 7: I mean, pretty much. It's a it's a blank check. They could say, you have to build brand new fiber internet for this one town with 500 people. Some member of congress wants it. And then you have to charge them the same price you charge in Downtown Phoenix, where we'd have 10,000 people on the same line. And if you don't, here's $10,000,000 fine for you. Or here's another illustration. So you're deciding where to build out new fiber service. You're choosing an area between areas where you'd might make 1,000,000 a year versus 2,000,000 a year. The rational decision, of course, is you build out to the area where you're gonna have more uptake. Among other things, that would serve more people. But the FCC could fine you because it turns out that that was a more white area, whereas the $1,000,000 a year area is majority minority. And so the FCC is mandating what amounts to affirmative action and racial quotas for everything that the companies do. Speaker 1: Yeah. So I I wanna I mean, this just sounds like a mafia shakedown. Right? I mean, the the that but I I wanna just make sure we're clear. You said it's a federal government takeover of the Internet. Can you elaborate on that? That specific labeling? Speaker 7: Sure, absolutely. Well, we deal with regulated industries all the time and that's not necessarily takeover. Sometimes it's just everyone coming together and agreeing what they want the industry to look like and putting rules in place. But here there are no standards for when you have to bring a case or not, for how much you can find, for what orders you can give. Basically, there are no rules. And so the real effect is going to be that companies will be terrified because they won't know what they're allowed to do. The real question of what they're allowed to do is going to be determined by how much effort they spend sucking up to the government. And anytime the government wants them to do something, they'll have no choice but to come running and do it because the penalty for not doing that is potentially an endless legal nightmare. Speaker 1: So we've introduced this idea of a skeleton key before. I think Christopher Caldwell's book, Age of Entitlement, talks about how good intentions and a broadly written law can then be really given all the power to the enforcers or to the bureaucrats, and especially for left wing type priorities. Do you think that this fits into the criteria of an idea of a skeleton key law? Speaker 7: Absolutely. So no one is arguing, certainly not me, no one is arguing for the idea that companies should discriminate in how they lay out broadband. But using this idea that any difference in the real world amounts to discrimination is sufficient evidence of discrimination is the way that you turn every three letter letter agency, whether that's us at the FCC, whether that's the Federal Trade Commission, the FBI, the DOJ, whether you turn it in effect into a DEI agency. Every project has to have requirements and preferences, every agency has to be turned into a civil rights agency. So housing and urban development for example, they're trying to make it a legal requirement for cities to build low income housing projects next to or in the middle of any nice neighborhoods they have. There really doesn't seem to be any problem that can't be solved by calling people racist and punishing them for some other unrelated business decision. So another example, another one of the federal telecom agencies, NTIA, I'm an alumnus of them, they're distributing $40,000,000,000 in subsidies to build fiber internet, but they've loaded up the program. It's not just a fiber building program. It's a union labor mandate program. It's a DEI requirement program. It's a preference for government owned internet services program. And so you know, whether or not you think any of those things are a good idea, the point is that they've been put in in regs and therefore the agency has been diverted from its purpose to start doing all of these other DEI type things. Speaker 1: Yeah. So I mean, I guess a question I have is, is corporate America lobbying against all of this? I mean, do the traditional big uglies of the big firms? What where is their stance on this? Speaker 7: Yeah, because you would think that it's in their interest to have as much freedom of operation as possible. And to a degree that's true, and there will be counter pressure coming from some of the big companies in this area. But sometimes they sort of bring it on themselves. So if you look at the item that we just did at the FCC yesterday, when the underlying bill was still in Congress, a lot of corporate lobbyists actually said, we're okay with it. Congress gave them tens of billions in federal handouts as part of the same thing. So despite all those work strings being attached, overall they decided that it was worth it to be bought off. We need them to realize that this is a, in the words of my colleague, Carr, a Faustian bargain. In ten years the handouts will be gone but they'll have this digital equity arbitrage forever. It will never be enough. There's no way that you can ever make someone happy if there's no standard for what compliance is. On the other hand, by the time this comes along, people who were present at the original decision may well have collected their bonuses, retired, it won't be their problem anymore, it'll be our problem. Speaker 1: You stay right there, Nathan. One of the reasons I want to have you on is this is not a rule that's going to get front page New York Times treatment, but it's an excellent example of the subtle yet significant power of the federal bureaucracy, and hundreds of these decisions are made every single year. Not all of them get by the way, not the FCC has a board. Right? Not every agency has a board. And it just so happens, you know, we're here to talk about this. Think about the hundreds of other micro decisions the bureaucracy is making in equity and racial this. It adds up to a less free country. Nathan Symington, please stay right there, excellent job. MyPhD Weight Loss, check it out right now, that's MyPhD D weight loss. It's amazing at myphdweightloss.com. If you want to shed a few pounds, check out my Ph. D weight loss. I have lost over 25 pounds and I have no trouble maintaining it and I feel great. If you need to lose a few pounds, you don't have to do it alone. Give them a call at (864) 644-1900 today and get that first time consultation on your schedule. Your PhD nutritionist can set up a start date together, but don't put off the call. Working that call into my busy schedule a year ago has changed my life and I want the same for you. It is one of the best calls that you can make. So check it out right now, at myphdweightloss.com. Call (864) 644-1900. Call them today right now at myphdweightloss.com. That is myphdweightloss.com. Nathan Symington continues on a very important story that won't get top line coverage, but it goes to show the power of the bureaucracies. Congress didn't vote for this. Bureaucracies just make it up. We'll be right back. Of the people. Patrick, thank you so much for taking the time. Patrick, your book confirms and or the poll, I should say differently. The poll this week from the New York Times confirms the thesis of your book. That's a better way to frame it. Tell us about your book and how also the data is confirming your hypothesis. Speaker 11: So my book is about how essentially the parties, the parties that we knew maybe when I was growing up have just completely reversed themselves in terms of the democrats used to be seen as this party of the working class, party of the people really standing up for the blue collar worker. And really ever since 2016, that really hasn't been true anymore. You've seen this huge reversal in terms of working class voters increasingly voting Republican and voted for Trump in 2016. And more so, a lot of these coal a lot of these groups voted more so in 2020, including Latinos, African Americans. Now that looks to be if if this poll is fracked, it's gonna be like that on steroids in 2024. When you look at Trump being at 22% of the black vote within eight among Hispanic voters, We really are seeing a realignment in our politics. Speaker 1: Yes. So what is driving this? Is it the Republicans embrace of populist nationalist ideas, or is it a combination of academic fantasy ideas of white liberalism that don't resonate with non college educated muscular class voters? Speaker 11: It is it is a it is definitely a combination of both, but I think that, you know, everything that we're seeing out of the college campuses over the last month suggests that the left has really learned nothing about how to moderate their message to appeal to the working class majority of the country who are not interested in these ideas of decolonialization, of intersectionality, of things that are only ideas that only somebody with an advanced degree even could could even fathom. So I I do think that they're just continuing to dig themselves a bigger hole. And you go back to it didn't used to be like this. You go back to as recently as the nineteen nineties. And Bill Clinton, you know, a lot of Republicans didn't like Bill Clinton when he was president, but he is somebody who really moderated his message, said the era of big government is over, signed welfare reform, signed the Defense of Marriage Act. All of these things that, you know, you could not see Joe Biden for all his, like, talk about for all the talk that he is somehow this sort of blue collar working class Democrat. He is just as beholden, I think, to the left as as anyone, and you just don't see that kind of democrat anymore. Speaker 1: Why do you think that is? This Donald Trump obviously changed American politics that will be one of his longest lasting legacies is reshaping the Republican party. Democrats seem comfortable. They don't seem as if they want to win over muscular class voters again. They think they can create a fusion of the permanently government addicted and the hyper educated Boston elite. Why is that? Speaker 11: Well, I think they're going to be net then reduced to that elite. That's what's starting to happen. So this idea is the Democratic Party has always been this coalition of folks who are, you know, these liberals, primarily white liberals, and African Americans, Hispanics, minority voters, right? I mean, has always been kind of the core of the democratic coalition and now we're seeing that break apart where significant chunks of voters in these minority communities have actually started to break off. I know there's been talk about this for decades or poll conservatives have talked about this for decades, but it actually seems to be happening. So what's going on? What's going on is a lot of these groups are actually better off. So you know, under under Donald Trump, Hispanic incomes rose 20%. Speaker 1: Welcome back, everybody. Email us freedom@charliekirk.com. It's a very important topic. It's very important. It's not getting a lot of coverage, obviously. Mister Symington from the FCC continues. So I guess the immediate question is, will this affect my own Internet? Speaker 7: Well, it definitely will because the federal government is putting out a huge amount of money for this, but all that money is competing with each other. You know, you can't just wish resources into being by writing a check. Even if you've got the power of the US treasury behind you, there's just physical limitations on how many workers there are, how long it takes to trench and put in fiber, how long it takes to build the tower and hang radios off it, whatever you might want to ask. It's going to make everyone's internet much more over time, more costly and the worst thing is it's going to deflate the value of developing a project. So fewer projects will get developed. Corporations don't just have big plots of money, they go out and get financing just the way that you might take out a construction loan to build an office building or some such. And all of those deals are going to be implicitly deflated by this. So we can expect high priority political areas to get the best results out of this and the forgotten middle to get the worst. Speaker 1: Yeah, that's Can you just kind of speak for a second of how the FCC is composed and how many members of the board are there? Just for the uninitiated to our audience, explain it. And then also explain your purview. Speaker 7: Sure. So with the FCC, there's five of us. That's a recent development because the third Democratic seat was only filled in September. So for most of the Biden administration, there hasn't been a third Democrat and we've been in a two-two situation, which may explain why this item didn't come up until now. But the most important thing about us is that at the commissioner level, we're independent. That means appointed by the president, confirmed by the senate. After that, you cannot get fired unless you're committing crimes. So that lets me get out here and say what I really think without having to worry that that the secretary of something or other is gonna fire me over it. Regarding the purview, so the FCC kinda gets started for two reasons. Number number one, the old AT and T phone monopoly, which was a government backed monopoly that was the alternative. The United States was the only country in the world not to have a socialized national phone system at the time. So we said, no, we're going to let a private company run it, we're just going to supervise it and the FCC was put in place to do that. The other thing was to coordinate radio broadcasting. When radio was a young field, no one knew how to coordinate frequencies and people would just run up the power level and transmitters and try to interfere with each other in the best markets. Obviously, that wasn't workable, so we started a system of assigning frequencies and sort of took it from there. So in the modern day, it's cell phones, it's the phone network, it's also radar, it's satellite communications, undersea cables, pretty much any interstate communication by radio or wire. Speaker 1: So that's very helpful. Thank you. Talk to the processes that there's term limits, right? Is that correct? There are terms on each one of the board members? Speaker 7: Five year terms. Speaker 1: Yeah. And so then what what if there were to be a different winner of the election, like if if Trump, for example, were to win next November, what would that mean for vacancies on the board? Speaker 7: Well, the chairman, or in this case, the chairwoman, it's tradition the chair resigns on inauguration day at So nine Trump's FCC chair, Ajit Pai, still had time left in his term, but he resigned on inauguration day. So the tradition is that every president gets to pick his own chair. Speaker 1: Got it. Me just kind of final question here. You were a federal regulator during the Obama administration. Why were we able to have you come on and say this, and we don't hear this from other agencies like the FBI unless we get a whistleblower? Speaker 7: Oh, I'm sorry, wasn't here for the Obama administration. I took office in 2020. But nonetheless, yes, I'm politically independent. That is a really unique thing about how our agency works, because we have powers which is like the executive, but we also have rulemaking powers which is like the legislative. And so they made us independent so that we weren't beholden to either one of those because it would be a stealing of power from the other branch, if you see what I mean. Now in the case of some other agency, at the end of the day, the person on top may be confirmed by the Senate and nominated by the president, but is not politically independent. They instead they might serve at the president's pleasure. Well, you want to get on the wrong side of the president, that's a very quick way to get transitioned out of your job. Speaker 1: Nathan Symington, thank you so much. Excellent job. Appreciate it. Thank you. Speaker 7: Huge pleasure, Charlie. Take care. Speaker 1: Email us freedomcharleykirk dot com and subscribe on our to our podcast by going right here. This podcast by the way, podcast is doing very well. Number 11 right now in Apple News, so we'll see if that improves throughout the day. We shall see. 11 in Apple News, so please take out your phone and subscribe to the Charlie Kirk Show podcast. Several stories we have yet to hit, so email us freedom@CharlieKirk.com. President Xi comes and visits one of his colonies. He comes home. He wants to see what he's been buying. He wants to make sure that it's been a good investment for the homeland. Our ruler Winnie the Pooh is on the homeland right now. We are back. Speaker 11: American incomes rose 20%. So there no there's no longer the sense that they are need to be dependent on the federal government. You talk to people. I visited the Rio Grande Valley of South Texas, and you talk to people down there and they want to get ahead by their own hard work and are very suspicious of anyone who is on government welfare benefits. I mean, that is a really big concern. When you talk to people down there, see who talk about, like, why is there a Tesla in front of the unemployment office that shouldn't be happening? So it's a very different kind of politics that I think people on the left and, you know, frankly, some people on the right have assumed about about these people. They want they're achieving the American dream. They wanna get ahead, and they realize the Democratic Party is not helping them get there. Speaker 1: So let's just talk pure numbers in the states that matter, Georgia, Wisconsin, Arizona, maybe Pennsylvania. If these trends continue and Republicans get near 50% or at least near an equilibrium within the margin of error with Hispanics and continue to do well with working class whites, but maybe do a little bit worse with upper middle class white voters, What does that mean? How how significant is the growth in the multi class the multiracial middle class to just get one more vote than the other guy? Speaker 11: I mean, I I think that what Trump showed in 2016 and why the election was so close in 2020 was the fact that this coalition of working class whites and the more African Americans, Latinos punches above its weight in the electoral college. You know, when it comes to the states that will actually decide the election, not just the Rust Belt states of Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, but also states like Arizona, Georgia, and Nevada. You know, those states have tend to have few graduates than the blue states where primarily all these college graduates, people with postgraduate degrees, people who are listening to the crazy ideas coming out of college campuses now. You know, those are concentrated primarily in blue states. So that's why I think Trump or any Republican candidate would have an advantage in the electoral college by appealing and talking to these voters. Speaker 1: Yeah. If you look so the state with the most college degrees is by far by far Massachusetts, and it's that way every single year, I mean, with Boston and all that. And then Colorado is right up there. It's the second, And then it goes Vermont, New Jersey, Maryland, Connecticut. These are these are traditionally democrat states. And then you go from the bottom up, the ones that have the least college edge by the way, that doesn't mean they're stupid. I don't have a college degree. What it means though is that they have different professions. They'll work with their hands, plumbers, electricians, carpenters, oil fields, entrepreneurs. It's not an indictment of their intelligence. And they also but most importantly, Patrick, author of Party of the People, Different Value Systems. Speaker 11: That is absolutely right. This is a group that has never you know, they have never had anything handed to them. They've had to work for what they have. I And think that just they're unified united by a common sense value system, even if they don't vote Republican. I think that, you know, you particularly talk to try talking, I think about the green new deal or this green transition idea within these minority communities. And the polling is pretty clear on that, that when it comes to people really saying you know, all this stuff about global warming is nice and you hear this in focus groups a lot, but it doesn't help me put food on the table. And I think the real the real trigger as much as, you know, as much as Republicans wanna pat themselves on the back for realigning these voters, the real trigger for this has been the absolute failure of the Biden administration to bring down inflation meaningfully. And the fact that, you know, we've had so much inflation has really hit these voters particularly really hard in the wallet. And these are the voters who are actually paying attention to performance. You know, I think if you if you have a college degree, it doesn't necessarily mean you have more accurate ideas about politics or or the world because I think you're primarily, you're very partisan and you're voting. I think you're very committed to existing your existing ideology and whatever information comes out, really just is gonna push you in one direction or the other. This multiracial populist coalition is very pragmatic, is very common sense, and they can see what's happening. Speaker 1: I I wanna keep on diving into this. But a minute remaining a minute and a half remaining, does the does the working multiracial class you're talking about, if the Republican party were to go to all of sudden and nominate like a Mitt Romney or somebody like that, they wouldn't necessarily be on on board for that. Correct? Speaker 11: Well, I think that is it's a little bit I think we are not going back to that kind of Republican party. That said, I do think that there are a number of candidates running who Speaker 6: Warning. You're entering a not safe for the regime media zone. Facts incoming. Speaker 1: Alright, everybody. Welcome back. Email us freedom@CharlieKirk.com and subscribe to our podcast. Xi Jinping is visiting the colony of San Francisco. This whole thing is very bizarre. So first, Gavin Newsellini goes over to China, he does a visit there. Runs over a bunch of Chinese kids when playing basketball. The whole thing's very strange. You take some sort of GQ Vogue photo op on the Great Wall Of China, his shirt unbuttoned. It's very clear that Joe Biden sent Gavin Newsom. And Joe Biden says, hey, pal. I don't want to make the flight. You go. Because I guess they were doing kind of like a a trip swap type thing. And so Gavin goes to China and Xi Jinping comes to America. So Xi Jinping lands and he's coming to see his colony. He's invested so heavily into capturing the elite of America. And boy, they have delivered. So there's several takeaways here that are critically important. The first of which is the most obvious. When I visited Seattle this last summer, it was a mess. It was dirty. It was filled with vermin and swine and homeless people and degenerates and drug addicts and raging ludicicks come up to your car and start beating. It's a disgusting city. And I started talking to one of the people at my hotel. I said, This is unrecognizable. I said, Yeah, but it was actually pretty nice for a couple weeks this summer. I said, Why? I said, What changed? I said, Well, we had the MLB All Star game in Seattle this summer and they cleaned everything up. I said, Well, isn't it really demoralizing that if all the media cameras are coming, they clean everything up and then they don't care afterwards? Yeah, it's demoralizing, also shows they can fix it. This can be fixed. Urban dirtiness can be fixed. Now I find it hilarious that of all the things that motivate them to clean up the streets of San Francisco, it's Jinping. As many people have been commenting, Gavin Newsom gives a long speech assuring San Francisco homeless they can go back to pooping on the streets once Xi Jinping returns back to China. Play cut six. Speaker 22: I know folks say, oh, they're just cleaning up this place because all those fancy leaders are coming into town. That's true because it's true. But it's also true for months and months and months prior to APAC. We've been having different conversations. Speaker 1: You're not as smart as you think you are, Gavin. It's true because it's true. It also shows elections don't mean anything in California. He knows that he's got that job for life if he wants it. Total totalitarian dictator. Maybe he's not that different than Xi Jinping. So Xi Jinping arrives and Gavin greets him. Hey, old pal. How you doing? Xi Jinping's motorcade drives through San Francisco and it's noticeably clean. It's the cleanest San Francisco has been in multiple generations. Who who would have known? All we have to do to clean up the streets of San Francisco is fly in dictators. Playcut 64. Where are the American flags? What's with all the Chinese flags? Not a single US flag. But to be fair, they probably didn't remove any. You know what they probably had to remove, though? Some gay flags. CCP's not big into pride. It's not a it's not a core Confucian value to have men become women. So they're meeting Xi Jinping and Biden decides to fly in. He's like, oh, I can take the cross country flight. Let's go to cut one zero seven. Speaker 0: Gavin was ready to take the relationship to the next level until he found out there was someone else, Joe Biden. The president flew in on Air Force One. Now Newsom had competition. When Chi saw Joe, they couldn't keep their hands off each other. As Joe likes to brag, he spent more time with Chi than anyone else. Not to mention the fact that Chi's guys bribed the Biden family. The chemistry was unmistakable. Speaker 2: I've never doubted what you've told me in terms of your candid nature in which you speak. Speaker 3: I still remember our interactions very vividly, and it always gives me a lot of thoughts. Speaker 1: Thoughts or thoughts? That's the question. So look. The Chinese Communist Party is the great enemy of America, but he comes in and gets a hero's welcome here in the country. And just to be fair, you should always be talking to leaders even if they're their enemies. I totally supported Trump having him over to Mar A Lago, but you gotta be very clear about what you stand for. So Xi Jinping comes to San Francisco. Now the one thing we can hope for is Xi Jinping goes back to China, and he gives a big speech. We are no longer embracing left wing Marxism. He's like, that's a mess. Like, he goes back, and he just denounces the whole thing. It's like, jeez. That's what we're heading towards. But understand, the bromance between Gavin, Biden, and Xi Jinping, it's deeper than you might think. China is not an enemy. They're not a competitor. China is the goal. We've said for quite some time that the lack of understanding of Maoism will be our downfall. We are living through a cultural revolution. Xi Jinping runs the Chinese Communist Party. The Chinese Communist Party is the same project started by Mao Zedong. Mao Zedong launched a cultural revolution. He had a moment where people could speak out and there could be free speech until repressive tolerance came. Struggle sessions were Maoist. There were 10 different categories that were created in Mainland China, five for fascists, five for communists. Parents were incentivized to train their kids in the communist way, and the kids were incentivized to turn in their parents if they were not a 100 behind the party. The American leadership look at Xi Jinping and they privately say, man, it must be awesome. Must be awesome, mister Xi Jinping, that you have all this power, that you can do whatever you want whenever you want to do it. The American ruling elite, Gavin Newsom and Joe Biden, they wanna be more like Xi. They don't look at this as a conflict between two countries. They look at America hopefully to become closer to the Chinese Communist Party model. Cut one zero eight, Winnie the Pooh says that China wants to be friends with The US. Yeah. Even though they attack us cyber, they send in their kids to our schools to spy on us, they buy up land near military bases, they dump, steal, solar panels, and critical infrastructure and plastic. They pump fentanyl into our country in the reverse opium wars. They have digital fentanyl through TikTok. By the way, did China ever pay for COVID? Did they ever pay for COVID for creating a virus in the laboratory? Did anyone even mention it? Of course not. Joe Biden is there to go kiss the ring of who's been paying for the lifestyle for the Biden family for years. Play cut one zero eight. Speaker 4: Whatever stage of development it may reach, China will never pursue hegemony or expansion and will never impose its will on others. China does not seek spheres of influence and will not fight a cold war or a hot war with anyone. China will remain committed to dialogue and post confrontation and build partnerships instead of alliances. It will continue to pursue a mutually beneficial strategy of opening up. The modernization we are pursuing is not for China alone. We are ready to work with all countries to advance global modernization featuring peaceful development, mutually beneficial cooperation, and common prosperity, and to build a community with a shared future for mankind. Speaker 1: I mean, everything he's saying is a lie. They they lie professionally. They don't have a moral code like we do in the West. It's all about power. It's all about expanding the Chinese Communist Empire. They own ports of entry all throughout Africa and South America. The Belt and Road Initiative is the recreation of taking over the world. I mean, I can go through the list, and our leaders take it. Our leaders say, oh, yes. Must be so great. What great relations that we have. In a rare moment of honesty, Joe Biden calls Xi Jinping a dictator, Not exactly smart diplomacy, but honestly, I respect the candor. Play cut one zero nine. Are we becoming more like China or is China becoming more like America? The promise of free trade and the promise of neoliberalism is that eventually China would become like America. They become a liberal democracy with private property rights and entrepreneurship and free speech. We were sold by the Mitt Romneys of the world and the Paul Ryans of the world and George W. Bush and Dick Cheney. We were sold by the Bill Clintons, and even to a lesser extent, Ronald Reagan, that eventually China would liberalize and they would just become an open minded country because the more we traded them, the more it changes their values, and the opposite happened. The more that we have traded with China, they have got wealthier, but they've also become less free. They've become far more totalitarian, less open to different and new ideas. Most Americans never used to worry about the Chinese Communist Party until Trump woke us up. And understand the Chinese Communist Party owns Joe Biden, owns many members of the American government. Here's a montage of Joe Biden saying the rise of China was good, of course, because he's on the payroll. He's a traitor to The United States The United States, and he's a agent of the Chinese Communist Party, play cut 60 '7. Speaker 23: Let me be clear. I believed in 1979 and said so, and I believe now that a rising China is a positive development, not only for the people of China, but for The United States and the world as a whole. We want to see China rise, to continue to rise in a responsible way that will benefit you most, China, because you have an important role to play. A rising China can be a significant asset for the region and the world and selfishly for The United States. Speaker 1: He is an agent of the Chinese Communist Party. Are your kids or grandkids spending hours on YouTube and Netflix getting indoctrinated by woke ideology? It's time for you to take control over what your kids are watching and what is going on to shape them as they grow up. Sherwood is a content platform that offers ad free wholesome entertainment for families with traditional values. Make no mistake, the left is pushing their CRT and their trans agenda and it's making its way into kids entertainment. Sherwood has a library of audiobooks, ebooks, videos from classics like Velveteen Rabbit and Treasure Island, one of my favorites, to timeless cartoons and other entertaining content. It's a lifetime subscription to Sherwood Kids. It's usually $750, but this month only you can get a lifetime subscription for just $299. Just use promo code Charlie. Sign up today at sherwoodkids.com. That is sherwoodkids.com. Take back control over your kids' entertainment. Are you tired of playing defense with your kids' entertainment? Well, today, children can't even walk in the library, turn on the TV without seeing progressive nonsense and agendas everywhere. That's why we love Sherwood. It's ad free, wholesome kids entertainment platform that shares your value values. Sherwoodkids.com. Wonderful company. Check it out. Special deal. Sherwoodkids.com. Email us freedom@charliekirk.com and subscribe to our podcast. Open up your podcast app and type in Charlie Kirk show. So much more to cover. Email is freedom@CharlieKirk.com. We'll be right back. Speaker 11: By and large, capitalize on this on these trends. And you see it in a place like Virginia with Glenn Youngkin, you know, who did really well, and we'll see, you know, in the election tomorrow, you know, how well his candidates do. But I do think that, you know, we are permanently on a trajectory, I think here, where people are gonna have to, you know, Republicans are gonna have to realize, you know, it's not, you know, it's not gonna be the case that, you know, you're fully going to go back to where we were before Trump. And I think people in the establishment need to understand that too. Speaker 1: Patrick Raffini, stay right there. We have you for another segment. I encourage people to check it out. Party of the People inside the multiracial populist coalition remaking the GOP. So, Patrick, if you were advising the Republican party to go into 02/2024, there is a open question. Do you try to run up the score in the rules and go straight working class voter, or do we just kind of forget the upper middle class suburban type voter? Is or is it a balance of both for every messaging you do, you know, towards suburban? You might turn off some of the working class folks, or there are issues that can bridge the divide. What would you say, Patrick Rafini? Speaker 11: I think you always have to look at the issues that will bridge the divide because you're gonna you're gonna kill two birds with one stone that way. But what I do think that right now, are very concerned about the border. People are very concerned about the economy and the state the continued high inflation, the fact that, you know, prices are 20% higher than they were when Joe Biden was inaugurated. People are concerned about crime. We used to think about a lot of those issues as base issues, but the failure on those issues has been so great that those are not just base issues anymore. Those are issues that really resonate across the spectrum with independents, moderates, and they also resonate with Hispanics and African Americans too, especially. So I think like, we have plenty of issues. If we can stay focused, I think on those three issues, I think Republicans are gonna be in good shape. Speaker 1: Yeah. And I mean, so the the other question I have for you is that can another candidate other than Trump continue a multiracial type working class coalition? We've seen a little bit of evidence of that with DeSantis in 02/2022, but it hasn't really been replicated. It seems as if rural turnout dives a little bit, that kind of mystery voter is hard to replicate. Can it be done? Speaker 11: I think it can. I think it can in the sense of, yeah, you you have seen it. You you definitely have seen it with DeSantis. You've seen it with a candidate like I mentioned Junkin as well. I do think that in the sense of, I mean, you may have, and when you have candidates like, look, mean, MAGA was not a huge fan of Brian Kemp, but in Georgia, he carried that state in a landslide. Really, he carried by eight points and he won in all the places Trump won, but he added back some of those suburban voters. So, yeah, I think that any of these candidates. Speaker 1: Alright, everybody. Welcome back. Email us freedom@charliekirk.com. Story and politico dot com. Very interesting. We are mentioned. You guys are mentioned, actually, all of us together. Ronna McDaniel is under siege, and her critics concede she's likely to survive. For now, we shall see. She is likely to survive for the time being. It goes on to say that the members of the one sixty eight in the RNC, they think she's doing a great job. I wanna read one of these here. So there's a guy, Jeff Kaufman, brave soul from Iowa. He thinks that Rana's doing amazing. Having worked with chairwoman Rana over the past two election cycles, I could not have asked for a better partner to ensure help us ensure historic up and down republican victories in Iowa. Without her support, Iowa and the Iowa caucus would not be the first in the nation. She has my full confidence as we head into the thick of caucus season. Okay. That that's that's not an unfair statement as far you have to you have to fight for your state. You have to fight for your state so you get you get the caucus, but is she gonna help us win the White House? And by the way, Jeff Kaufman. It's not because of Rana that Iowa has turned red. It's because of Trump. Trump has turned Iowa from battleground state to a deep red state. Period. End of story. Iowa was a fifty fifty state. Barack Hussein Obama won it in 02/2008, and Iowa is now deep red because of Trump, not because of Rana. But Jeff Kaufman, your argument is that we should have Rana remain the chair because you guys got the Iowa caucus first. Like, that's a really I'm I I get that's what you have to do. You should fight for that in Iowa. I believe by the way, believe Iowa should be first. That's a bad argument for why she should stay chair of the RNC. We're mentioned here, quote, Charlie Kirk urged Trump to push for a change in leadership. Quote, there's still time to course correct on many of the structural problems of the RNC, Kirk said in a statement, but we need to move Kirk and Turning Point have tried to unseat McDaniel in the latest RNC election, but we fell short. That is correct. We did fall short. In the aftermath of last week's elections, the simmering frustration with McDaniel has become far more pronounced. North Carolina GOP chair Michael Watley says, I was disappointed with a vague statement. What the RNC is trying to do is give everyone of these candidates an opportunity to communicate their message to the American people. Hey, Michael Watley. Why aren't you disappointed that we got our clock cleaned? Last Tuesday? There is a petition. It's fire Rana dot com. It's brought to you by Vivek Ramaswamy. Laura Ingram kinda butted heads with Rana. Play cut 13, please. Speaker 24: Why should you retain your job given the track record of the party under your leadership? And to that, what do you say? Speaker 21: Well, first, I'm gonna continue to focus on Joe Biden and Democrats. And I think there was a moment missed during that debate by Vivek to talk about the fact that we still have 13 American hostages in Israel. The fact that for the first time ever in the history of either party, we had a Jewish co sponsor for a debate, and we are in very perilous times in our country. Speaker 1: No. No. I'm sorry. Enough gaslighting. Are you a winner or a loser? Enough of the fluff. Okay? And by the way, I'm so tired of this. I don't do messaging. I do messaging. I can't spend money on state races. I to get your act together. Okay? It's always it's always a dick it's like a escape hatch. It's like constantly hold on a sec. I can't pin this thing down. Play cut 14. Speaker 24: One of the things, Arana, that happened was, I I think in Virginia, people were wondering where the money was, whether they were gonna get some help from the RNC. And I I know at one point, you said that that you were not asked for money in Virginia, but a source, Republican source familiar with the Youngkin team in Virginia told the angle late tonight that that is false. And there, meaning your story keeps changing. Anyone who thinks Virginia Republicans wouldn't wanna help when we knew we'd be outspent isn't being serious. You know, Rana, they were outspent by $8,000,000. Speaker 21: Glenn Youngkin and did a phenomenal job and he raised a lot of money. A lot of people don't understand fundraising. I can't raise state dollars. I don't get unlimited convention and and state dollars. And these were state house and state senate races. The r n c gets federal committee. So, I mean, come on. Speaker 1: First of all, what what are you talking about? You you I think there are segregated accounts, but is it not true that the r n c data is used by Republican candidates up and down the ballot? True or false? So and this is like a major slippery gaslighting thing. And when the great Larry O'Connor asked you about it, you said, oh, they didn't need the money. You didn't use that. It's either you can or you can't. Do you do messaging? We don't do messaging. It's the candidate's fault. Here's the essence. Losing. You gotta go. You gotta go. It's not personal. You're a sweet person. Go find something else to do. Email us freedom@charliekirk.com. See you guys tomorrow.

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

@AshleyKlennon Me.. https://t.co/6jIgmUgXvG

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

@Jonatha19926576 @BBTunisia1 Search and drop relevant shit bro.

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

@marcodecunha @xdownloaderbot download this video

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

@Seeing_Dbl Do you have more info?

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

@Ni99let @MrsErikaKirk Good find

MrAndyNgo
Posted - September 14, 2025 at 1:57 AM
Saved - September 16, 2025 at 1:38 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I uncovered evidence that the suspect in the Charlie Kirk assassination, Tyler Robinson, has a trans lover named "Luna," who is anti-Christian and on hormones. A neighbor reported seeing them together shortly before the incident, raising questions about potential motives linked to trans issues. Additionally, I expressed concern about an AI-generated photo of the suspect that circulated widely, as it could mislead the public while the investigation was ongoing.

@MrAndyNgo - Andy Ngo

Unmasking "Luna": How I found the evidence confirming that the Charlie Kirk assassin suspect's alleged lover is trans, anti-Christian and on hormones. Suspect Tyler Robinson allegedly killed Charlie while he was answering a question about trans shooters. https://www.ngocomment.com/p/unmasking-luna-charlie-kirk-assassin

Unmasking 'Luna': Charlie Kirk Assassin Suspect's Alleged Lover Is Confirmed to Be Trans I investigate the evidence confirming that Tyler Robinson's room mate, who authorities believe was actually his romantic partner, is trans ngocomment.com

@MrAndyNgo - Andy Ngo

Josh Kemp, a neighbor of Charlie Kirk assassin suspect Tyler Robinson & his trans lover "Luna" Twiggs said he saw them kissing a couple weeks before the shooting. Authorities are now probing whether support for trans motivated the Antifa suspect to kill. https://t.co/sFaQ1Pfq0x

Video Transcript AI Summary
Two weeks ago, they were seen as a couple: “they were holding hands” and “they were,” and they “drove off in his car, the Dodge,” with “him dressed all in black? Yeah. Definitely.” The roommate was described as having “freckles on his face” and a “mushroom shaped” haircut. There were “published reports out there that this individual, the roommate, may have been transiting,” and the witness replied, “Did that correlate with what you saw? Yeah. Definitely.” “Okay. So he was going to have an operation to be to turn into a woman.” “Yeah. Yeah. And I think he's getting ready for that.” There was talk of a “doctor's appointment,” and they were seen “Just coming out” with the witness hearing “snippets of their conversation.” The witness said, “random guys don't hold hands and definitely don't kiss.” Nearby, it was “covered with police tape, a ton of police cars,” with “a guy sitting up on the hill with a sniper” and “SWAT trucks and definitely a few helicopters and a drone as well.” The observer asked, “Is there did a killing happen here?” and later learned “the guy that shot Kirk was lived right close to me,” adding, “For Charlie Kirk, I knew him over the years. Like, I didn't know him personally, but I've watched his videos before.”
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: With him. Were they holding hands? Yeah. They were. So yeah. They I mean, they drove off in his car, the the Dodge The time you saw them or this week? It was about the time I saw them. So long ago was that? I would say about two weeks ago. And did they so they looked like they were a couple? Yeah. Yeah. And he was dressed all in black? Yeah. Definitely. Mhmm. And you thought he was weird? Yeah. I I definitely. Yeah. What was weird about him? Just the way he walked and just the way I've seen him. I've never seen really anybody dressed all in black with a mask on, and I thought that was just quite weird. For those who've never seen the roommate, describe describe that person for us. He so he did have freckles on his face. For the haircut, he did have it was a weird haircut. Can't quite it was kind of a mushroom shaped one. Yeah. He was I would say he didn't come out much, but definitely a few other, like, just a little bit at a at a time. There's some published reports out there that this individual, the roommate, may have been transiting. Did that correlate with what you saw? Yeah. Definitely. Okay. So he was he was going to have an operation to be to turn into a woman. Yeah. Yeah. And I think he's getting ready for that. So does it what way do you think that? I remember them talking about a doctor's appointment. It was about about two weeks ago, I would say. And they were kissing? Yeah. Do you know where where did you see them kissing? Just coming out. I was riding with my bike, so I didn't see the whole thing. But, yeah, they were I saw them. And when did you hear them talking about a doctor's appointment? I would say about the same time that they came out. So that one time. Yeah. And where were you standing for that? I was just riding by here. So And you're able to hear snippets of their conversation? Yeah. Yep. But you were sure that they were a couple, you have only seen them together once? Mhmm. Yeah. Yeah. I mean, the way I mean, random guys don't hold hands and definitely don't kiss. So I would have tried to stop him if I knew it was him like before. I definitely I definitely do not like the fact that he was living close to me. It was covered with police tape, a ton of police cars. We had a guy sitting up on the hill with a sniper and SWAT trucks and definitely a few helicopters and a drone as well. What was going through your mind when you stepped in car? Like, I what is going on? And I asked the police officer. I'm like, is there did a killing happen here? They're like, I can't tell you. And so I I called my grandma. I found out that the guy that shot Kirk was at was lived right close to me. So for Charlie Kirk, I knew him over the years. Like, I didn't know him personally, but I've watched his videos before. And so

@MrAndyNgo - Andy Ngo

@EuPatrunjel The top left photo was made with AI, which made up facial features for the blurry screenshot. I wish people had not shared it so widely, especially while the suspect was at large.

ReiS_TuRCo
Posted - September 14, 2025 at 5:15 AM
Saved - September 14, 2025 at 9:00 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I'm puzzled about the missing images from the camera. Reports indicate that Turning Point USA staff might have had a security camera positioned directly behind Charlie Kirk during his murder. Shortly after the shooting, someone swiftly removed the device, which could have provided crucial footage.

@ReiS_TuRCo - KaNKa

Someone explain this Why are the images from this camera missing? Reports suggest that Turning Point USA staff may have the security camera positioned directly behind Charlie Kirk where he was murdered. Right after the shooting, someone quickly removed the device—footage that could reveal a critical new angle of the assassination.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Here, I just heard them say the active shooter, Charlie Kirk, has been shot. Charlie Kirk got hit is what the what the security detail just said. Here. I just heard them say the active shooter Here, I just heard them say the active shooter, Charlie Kirk, has been shot. Charlie Kirk got hit is what the what the security detail just said. Here. I just heard them say the active shooter Here, I just heard them say the active shooter, Charlie Kirk, has been shot. Charlie Kirk got hit is what the what the security detail just said. Here. I just heard them say the active shooter
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Here, I just heard them say the active shooter, Charlie Kirk, has been shot. Charlie Kirk got hit is what the what the security detail just said. Here. I just heard them say the active shooter
VoxExVeritas
Posted - September 14, 2025 at 7:42 AM
Saved - September 14, 2025 at 11:26 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I've been following the unfolding situation surrounding Charlie Kirk, especially after his recent assassination attempt. It seems there are numerous theories about why he was targeted, with some suggesting he had turned against Israel or was considering a presidential run. There's also a focus on his push for the release of Epstein files and connections to Mossad. Additionally, discussions about his security detail and alleged warnings before the shooting have surfaced. The narrative around his past comments on Israel and antisemitism is being actively reshaped, raising questions about political loyalty and influence.

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

Charlie Kirk Assassination Master Thread The Evidence (DEEP THREAD🧵ONGOING)

Video Transcript AI Summary
"If Bibi Netanyahu, if he does something I don't like and if I criticize it, am I, like, a bad Christian? Absolutely not." "What I find strange is that we're able to criticize the American government sometimes in the Christian world with more freedom than the Israeli government." "To be pro Israel means you believe in the nation of Israel Mhmm. Not necessarily the government of Israel." "When you when Joe Biden was president, you and I were what we loved America, but we detested our government." "You never you never once said, hey, I'm I'm out on America. On America's right." "And what they don't want is they don't wanna be called bad Christians Mhmm." "If they challenge a foreign government, which is what happens so often. Right. Like you're a bad Christian if you have a question about a foreign government."
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If Bibi Netanyahu, if he does something I don't like and if I criticize it, am I, like, a bad Christian? Absolutely not. What I find strange is that we're able to criticize the American government sometimes in the Christian world with more freedom than the Israeli government. To be pro Israel means you believe in the nation of Israel Mhmm. Not necessarily the government of Israel. When you when Joe Biden was president, you and I were what we loved America, but we detested our government. And those two those two things beautifully coexisted. Yeah. You never you never once said, hey, I'm I'm out on America. On America's right. Exactly. And what they don't want is they don't wanna be called bad Christians Mhmm. If they challenge a foreign government, which is what happens so often. Right. Like you're a bad Christian if you have a question about a foreign government. Right. That creates backlash that I don't think people understand.

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

🧵This was the breaking thread. https://t.co/i2ZstxjqOy

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

Why was Charlie Kirk shot? 👇🏻 Watch this. This was a month ago. Really watch it. If Charlie turned on israel...they'd be fucked. @HarrisonHSmith called it. https://t.co/bhgUEiIcpi

Video Transcript AI Summary
Megan Kelly and Charlie Kirk frame themselves as ardent defenders of Israel, urging caution against conflating critique with anti-Semitism. They argue that some in the pro-Israel camp punish mild pushback, harming credibility as they face online harassment and accusations of anti-Semitism, including Epstein/Mossad speculation. They cite a culture of hyperparanoia and insist they are Americans first. Megan recalls a Piers Morgan segment: she said 'the photos of the starving children out of Gaza' and 'they're manipulated, and they're masters of propaganda' and 'it's Hamas,' and that she is skeptical of taking those images at face value. They warn Israel risks losing standing with allies as support shifts: 'GOP in June 2024, 76%. Now 71%'; 'Dems in October 2023, 36%. Now it's at eight'; 'Independents ...(47%). Now it's 25%.' They defend hosting diverse voices—'you have no right to come on this show and demand a debate with me'.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You and I are both supporters of Israel, and Yeah. Have defended Israel since the beginning of this conflict, and and spoken out about the anti Semitism that has erupted on these college campuses many, many, many, many times. And something's happening though with this whole debate that is really bothering me, and I wonder if you're feeling it too. So I I mean, I genuinely believe you'd be hard pressed to find somebody in the public eye who's been as outspoken a defender of not every move Israel's taken in the war, but of Israel's right to defend itself and of the the just backward awfulness that we've been seeing on college campuses and the backlash against American Jews, than yours truly. I mean, I have been at the pointy end of the spear on this. And I Speaker 1: I completely agree with that. Speaker 0: And I it was all heartfelt, and it remains heartfelt. Speaker 1: Yes. Speaker 0: However, however, I my contention here is that some in the pro Israel camp are so knee jerk about calling you anti Semitic or getting deeply offended if you say anything that doesn't align with their narrative, that it undermines their own cause. And I have to tell you, I find it very irritating, because I do feel like some of us have earned the right to have some credibility on the subject of Israel and don't wanna be called those names when we have some mild pushback on some of the overreaches, whether it's, you know, whether they're winning or losing the propaganda war right now. And my contention is they've begun to lose it. And I realize it's propaganda coming at us from Hamas, but they their their numbers have turned. Here in America, they've turned, not so much with Republicans, a little bit with Republicans, but but completely with the Democrat party and with independents. They they have shifted mightily from at least double digits highs to single digit lows now with it with when it comes to approval. And also with respect to you and I speculated about this at the Turning Point event, whether the possibility of Jeffrey Epstein possibly being a Mossad agent or asset or affiliated with, that's been turned around on me too to you must be anti Semitic. What the hell? That's such bullshit. I agree. The same people who say, you can criticize Israel. That's fine. We won't call you anti Semitic if you criticize Israel. Turn around immediately and say, you're anti Semitic for even raising that. I completely reject that, and I raise this as a pushback against my friends on that particular strain of the aisle to watch it because you don't wanna alienate people who are openly your friends by going nuts in your crackdowns on mild pushback on anything related to Israel. Now you take it. Speaker 1: I'm so I'm I'm so glad you brought this up. And I would second that. Megan, I think I have a bulletproof resume showing my defense of Israel both on campus, on social media, to to great, you know, let's just say, mockery and scorn at times where I because I believe it. Right? I I believe in the scriptural land rights given to Israel. I believe in fulfillment of prophecy. And again, I'm not a theologian, but I'm a Christian. My life was changed in Israel. The spiritual energy is so amazing there. I I want them to win. I've said that repeatedly. Same. And however, Megan, you're hitting on something very potent and important. Now let me first say, I don't wanna judge an entire group because there's been many people in the Paris Real world that have been very sweet, very kind, very nuanced, very Charlie. You know, you're with us. You don't have to agree all the time. However, and I and I will say this, the behavior by a lot, both privately and publicly, are pushing people like you and me away. Not like we're gonna be pro Hamas. Not like we're gonna but we're like, honestly, the way you are treating me is so repulsive. I have text messages, Megan, calling me an anti Semite. Am learning biblical Hebrew and writing a book on the Shabbat. I honor the Shabbat, literally the Jewish Sabbath. I visit Israel and fight for it. And there's another article out in the Times of Israel today. I could read it on air. I was just reading before I got on. Charlie, what are you doing? Like, why are you what am I doing? I'm sorry. Like, let's just take a step back here. Like, I'm an American citizen. Yes. I want Israel to win. Yes. I'm a Christian. But, like, the sum of the mess and you saw I mean, you've seen how I've been treated, Megan, by some, not all, by some. Speaker 0: No. It's very irritating. It's it's been so unfair. They they were coming after you after Turning Point for among other things. They had Dave Smith there. Dave Smith isn't allowed to criticize Israel. You had both sides. The the Israeli side was over to represent. Speaker 1: Though. No. You're not allowed to. It's even worse than that. Again, I would just wanna repeat for the fifth time. I love Israel. I want Israel to win. But my moral character is now being put into question, Megan. Not my decisions. Not like, hey. Are you doing this? Is it smart or is it dumb? But no. I am a bad person if I do this. And it's a I I could go I mean, you saw it, Megan. It was trending on Twitter. Thousands of tweets and text messages. And if I were to be charitable and generous, I will say the people that are attacking me are in a hyperparanoid state because they're at war, and war tends to make things black and white, and you're a hammer looking for a nail. So I'm trying to be charitable, Megan. Literally, I'm trying to cut as much slack as I can. Right? They go, okay. What would it be like if all of a sudden I'm starting to see a pattern of behavior similar to what my grandparents saw in nineteen thirties Germany online? How would I behave? So that's like my charitable kind of over compensation spirit. At the same time, I'm like, but you're it's it's not defensible to be dumb. Right? Speaker 0: Yeah. So And it's offensive. It's offensive to those of us who have been out there defending them in many instances against critics on our own side. And now you have a couple of comments like, well, what about this? Well, has it gone on too long? Like, is it time to wrap it up? And the thing about Epstein is just so bizarre. I don't know who he was an agent for. It might have been Israel or an asset, or it might have been nobody. But we're allowed to speculate about that. It's like just some rule. You can't go there when it comes to Israel. Speaker 1: Well, you and I believe that we're Americans and Americans first, period. End of story. We are citizens of this nation. Okay? That's Israel, we have funded. We have supported. And they're up against a sea of Islamic totalitarianism, and we should be cheering for them. Right? Because they're up against barbarians and and monsters, and we want them to win. However, here is Megan Kelly and Charlie Kirk combined, probably 30,000,000 social media followers, like, pretty right? And you and I have been holding this down, and you you probably get the negative, oh, you're just shilling for Israel. I'm like, okay. I'm gonna do what's right regardless of the feedback. Right? But then all of a sudden, like, I host a person that I I moderate the debate of, mind you. Right? And I give equal time to Josh Hammer, equal time to a pro Israel advocate, and my moral character is being put into question. And so I I just I think it's a hyper paranoid, like, we're just gonna try to we're we're gonna just stamp out everything type type of practice, but it goes to the point where if for example, if I I have less ability sometimes online to criticize the Israeli government about backlash than actual Israelis do. And that's really, really weird, isn't it, Megan? It Speaker 0: it's so wrong headed. I'll tell you, this for me so I got some blowback after saying Mossad possibilities with Epstein, a comment behind which I stand. I mean, I and I've, of course, reported what Alan Dershowitz has said as his lawyer. He says, think he would have told me. He didn't say he had any of those connections. I hear all that. That doesn't mean it's not true. I think all these things should be explored. It's one of the many things that should be explored around Epstein. But saying that and also saying he might be a US asset, etcetera, doesn't make you anti Semitic. That's fucking crazy. And then we get to last week I go on Piers Piers Morgan. Right? So I go on Piers Morgan last week. And I don't talk about Israel a lot on this show. I just like covering the day to day of a conflict like this is not my thing. It's not what we do here at the We Megan Kelly haven't done it for Ukraine. We haven't done it for Israel. We haven't done it for a lot of conflicts, but we'll talk about it when big things happen. So Piers talks about it a lot. Piers asked me was a very interesting kind of culture study. So he asked me about the photos of the starving children out of Gaza. And I said a couple of things, both of which got a fair amount of pickup. Alright. So first, this is what I said about the photos. Listen to Sat 10. Well, I'm always reluctant to put too much stock in the images coming out of Gaza, that that phrase, because they're manipulated, and they're masters of propaganda, and they're fine having their own children starve just as long as they can put them on camera and show them off to the world. That that's Hamas, and frankly, it's a lot of Palestinians, so I'm very skeptical of taking those images at face value and saying it's Israel's fault. Okay. So that clip gets circulating Speaker 1: I'm with you on that. Speaker 0: A million times by my Israeli friends and my Jewish friends online. Like, go, Megan. Yeah. Okay. Great. Cool. Cool. Cool. Yeah. She's right on. Look at her you know, speak truth to peers. And then peers released as as a separate clip my follow-up to that comment. Okay? And and here's that. Speaker 1: Allowed to nuance, Megan. It's only tribalism. Speaker 0: That's right. So here's Sod 11. Israel, whether it realizes it or not, has made itself the villain of the world in in letting this thing go go on so long. They have lost support amongst their dearest friends, and even the entire Democrat party here in The United States has turned against them, and they're losing Republicans by the day here in America, which is their most important ally. So whether the fight continues to be just or not is almost irrelevant. As Trump said when he was running this time last year, not yet elected, time to wrap it up. And that's how I feel too. And I've given Israel a long berth. I fully understand as an American who was attacked on nine eleven, my country was that, you know, when you attack The United States and you kill thousands of our citizens, and Israel was in this position on 10/07, it's fine to respond, and it doesn't have to be proportionate. Whoever said it has to be proportionate. But what Israel's doing now is losing its standing with the rest of the world. It's starting to lose, too, even with its closest friends, its moral reputation, its moral, high ground. And, as Trump said a year ago, time to wrap it up. Speaker 1: Cue Well said. Speaker 0: The 25 text messages from people I know, like friends who are pro Israel. Like, I'm so sad that you've left us. I'm so sad you let's debate it. You know, many Jewish, advocates saying, let me come on your show, and we'll debate. There's nothing to debate. I'm on Israel's side. Just stop. Me observing I Speaker 1: totally agree. Speaker 0: That you're losing the propaganda war and that this has gone on for about two years now. And look. I mean, I pulled the stats. Support for Israel's military action in Gaza by party ID. GOP in June 2024, 76%. Now 71, so they lost 5%. Dems in October 2023, 36%. Now it's at eight. Independence, October 2023, it was 47%. Now it's 25%. You go under 35, you have almost zero support across The United States, your closest ally. I I see what's happening, and it's my job to comment honestly on it. But I am sick of being lectured on, like, you you have to see it exactly as we see it and support everything, or you're you're against us. Speaker 1: So so this is so important, Megan. And, again, I don't want not every you cannot say everyone in the pro is your and I don't say acts that way. But I Right. I got a text about you, Megan. Sam, why is Megan, like, doing the bidding of Hamas? I was like, what are you talking about? Megan's the best. Like, what she's amazing. And I said, why are you texting me about Megan? And I I I at that point and so this is what they don't understand. You and I, Megan, and Tucker is in the same category, and they've tried to go after Tucker Yeah. Is that the and and the more you attack our moral character, the actually, the more we're gonna double down in the direction because Speaker 0: 100%. Speaker 1: Don't do it that way. Okay? Right. Like, when tell me I'm wrong. Cool. Tell me if I got my facts wrong. By the way, the Epstein thing, Naftali Bennett says he was an Epstein agent. We have to be pursuers of truth. They've denied it. Fine. Let's keep digging. Okay. Fine. But the the the the thing that I don't think I think is being lost is like on some part of the population, you can scold them into silence. Right? But if I have any deviation of a purity test, any deviation whatsoever, such as hosting a focus group, right, Megan, with a bunch of our students that went viral, having Dave Smith or Tucker at my event, it is all of a sudden, oh, Charlie is a he's he's no longer us and all that. So wait a second. What do mean what is with us mean exactly? Right? Mhmm. I'm an American. Okay? Like, I I I represent this country, and I I don't even understand that paradigm. But, Megan, I think you would agree with this. I wanna make sure we fast, like, really zero in on this. Personality types like you, myself, and Tucker, the more that you guys privately and publicly call our character into question, which is not isolated. Right? I'm Megan, it would be one thing if it was one text or two text. It is dozens of texts. Yes. Then we start to say, hold the boat here. And and to be fair, some of my really good Jewish friends are like, that's not all of us. It's all but these are leaders too though. Right? These are these are stakeholders. Right? And so, look, I am I'm I'm afraid because again, I want civilization to win. I want the West to win. I don't want the Islam of fascist barbarians to storm the gates of Jerusalem. I want the holy sites protected. I believe in the holy land. I love that Jesus walked on water there and rose from the dead and preached in the the Mount Of Beatitudes. Like, I I feel the connection to Israel. And I but at the same time simultaneously, when the hostile reaction is that now Meghan and Charlie are enemies Right. Boy, I'll tell you. Like, you're you're you're you're you're gonna you're not gonna I won't say lose, but you will weaken and just basically deflate two of your strongest advocates if that continues. Speaker 0: Right. And it to me, I laugh because it's like, I've been bullied by the best of them. The best. And it it didn't work, and it's not going to work with them. And the more you try to tell me I can't criticize Israel, the more likely I am to do it, to focus on exactly what you're doing. Right? Like, what what are you doing that you're so defensive? You don't own me. I don't I don't take $1 of money from any Jewish affiliated group. That's not it's never been what my what my show's model. Take you know, Cozy Earth is my sponsor. People like Genucel. Those are the people I take. And I and I probably would feel reluctant to criticize Genucel, which is a great product, so I probably wouldn't do it anyway. My point is simply I have my honest opinions, which is why I had credibility for the two years I've been defending them. Right? And I still have that credibility, and I don't need lectures from my friends who are more pro Israel than I am or who are just American Jewish people who are concerned about what's happening. I don't need lectures on my coverage. Okay? I'll call it like I see it. And you have no right to come on this show and demand a debate with me because I've said something you disagree with. It's my show, and I'll decide the coverage we do here. Since president Trump was sworn in, his administration has made enormous progress at a breakneck pace. But don't forget, while they are moving mountains for the good of the nation, you've got your personal savings to worry about. And one of the best ways to look after your savings is through diversification, particularly with gold, like from Birch Gold Group. In the past twelve months, the value of gold has increased by 40%, and Birch was an advertiser on this show twelve months ago. If you had purchased then, you'd be 40% richer today. Now's the time. Central banks continue to bolster demand for gold by burying in record quantities. Global instability and tension is high, and Birch Gold makes owning physical gold so easy. Easily convert an existing IRA or four zero one k into a tax sheltered IRA in physical gold, or buy some to store in your home safe. Just text n k to the number 989898, and Birch Gold is gonna send you a free info kit on gold. Look into it. See if it's right for you. There's no obligation, just useful information to help you make a decision. With an a plus rating with a Better Business Bureau and tens of thousands of happy customers, Take control of your savings today. Text MK to 989898. Thanks so much for watching. If you like what you just saw, hit the subscribe button for more clips and full episodes.

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

🧵https://t.co/2TtdJ11qAG

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

Good Goys Gone Bad: Charlie Kirk Compilation Charlie didn't turn on israel- but israel turned on Charlie. The more I look into it the more I get the feeling he was considering running for president at some point and he's clearly not directly loyal to the Netanyahu crew.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Major themes: Epstein scandal and intel ties; unsealing documents; "Alexander Acosta in 02/2007, he said he was told to treat Epstein carefully because he was an intel asset." The panel asks "unseal all the Epstein documents" and ponders if Epstein was an "intel asset" and even a "Mossad" connection: "MI six, Saudi, or Mossad?"; "I wouldn't be surprised one bit" about intel community involvement. On Israel, Beebe says: "I didn't like how he said this. I'll be honest. You can't be MAGA if you're anti Israel." Ben Shapiro defends Israel; they push back against "legacy media are radically anti Israel." They cite polls showing waning American support for Israel's Gaza actions across parties, warn against stand-downs or regional war, and advocate American-first pragmatism while supporting Israel's right to defend itself.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And Jewish donors, they have a lot of explaining to do, a lot of decoupling to do, because Jewish donors have been the number one funding mechanism of radical open border neoliberal quasi Marxist policies, cultural institutions, and nonprofits. This is a beast created by secular Jews. And now it's coming for Jews, and they're like, what on earth happened? And it's not just the colleges. It's the nonprofits. It's the movies. It's Hollywood. It's all of it. It's like time for you guys to wake up and say no more. Draw a line in the sand. I don't care if you hate me. Why don't you update them, Megan? Speaker 1: Well, this is the first big scandal, I'd say, of the Trump administration that's on team rational. It's not a fake media scandal like the left tries to create for president Trump every other day. It's one of the right's own making, and it's not going well. And it has to do with Jeffrey Epstein. Yeah. Let let me just ask you. Make some noise if you care about the Jeffrey Epstein scandal. Speaker 0: Raise your hand if it matters a lot to you. Raise your hand. So every hand of 7,000 people. Speaker 1: Everybody cares. It I think A lot. Speaker 0: I said a lot. Every hand. I'm open to it. If that's true, why don't you just tell us the prisoners' names who are on the same cell block as Jeffrey Epstein? Speaker 1: There's a lot. Speaker 0: No. That's BS. I'm sorry. The president The United States figured out whether they have HIPAA for federal prisoners. Tell us I mean, tell us who the other prisoners were if no one had access to it because all of a sudden, if we find out some of these prisoners had suspicious intel ties. Speaker 1: It's funny because you look back at the the past, Dan and Cash talked about Epstein all the time when they were in my business that Speaker 0: hasn't been a shtick of mine. Speaker 1: Mine neither. Mine neither. I I talked about myself. Right? Same. Same. But I am a lawyer by training, and I can smell BS when it's being shoveled to me. And it's very obvious to me right now that we've got spinners trying to mess with us in Washington on a story that is important, and here's why. Yes. Obviously, child sexual abuse matters. And if we have some ring of pedophiles running around, I mean, outside of Hollywood, we need to know. One of the main reasons that we voted Trump in was because we wanted real answers on real stories, and we didn't wanna be BSed anymore with a bunch of nonsense from our government that treated us like a bunch of stooges. Speaker 0: What is the one two three sequencing? Press conference, you would get rid of Bondi. What else to get us back on track towards transparency? I think the DOJ should immediately move to unseal all the Epstein documents in the Southern District Of New York. Speaker 1: Yeah. Everything. Everything except I think every solitary. Speaker 0: I think every file should be released to the public the same way as the JFK files. Let the American people decide. Do you think there's any intel community involvement in this? Speaker 1: I wouldn't be surprised one bit. I am convinced based on my own sources and my own reporting on this story, he wasn't one of ours. Speaker 0: So he was an American, which leads basically three options. MI six, Saudi, or Mossad? Yep. Which one would you choose? Speaker 1: I guess Mossad, given his connection to Ghislain Maxwell. So Speaker 0: what does that mean? Speaker 1: Well, I mean, it's possible that that's the reason everything's getting buried, that there is some treasure trove, and it's getting buried because Speaker 0: How many people here believe that? Raise your hand. Speaker 1: That was Well a fishy answer. Speaker 0: And, Megan, remember, Alexander Acosta in 02/2007, he said he was told to treat Epstein carefully because he was an intel asset. That was that was one of Trump's cabinet secretaries who was literally a US attorney three hours from here Speaker 1: Yep. Speaker 0: In Florida. He said that himself. He fully No. Again, I don't wanna I don't wanna feed into any of the, let's just say, speculative theories. But Alexander Acosta himself talked about Intel Asset. Yep. And you have to wonder that the timing of all this. Sunday night so you have the big beautiful bill. You have Independence Day weekend. Why are you doing this on a Sunday night? Was it Bury it. But you don't bury things on Sunday nights. Speaker 1: You do on a holiday weekend. You do. Yeah. Color away. They're traveling back from the Speaker 2: beach on Sunday night. They're dealing with traffic. They knew they were too smart to to think that they could get away with doing it on a Saturday night. Speaker 0: No. No. No. But he'll tell the truth and we will lose we will be like, if Bongino can't go and fight and solve this thing, then, like, I mean, what are we doing here? Speaker 1: I know. Speaker 0: Right? If Dan Bongino, who's like one of the greatest patriots we have Yep. Cannot go and reform the FBI with Kash Patel after we win a popular vote majority Right. Then I'm not I'm like, I will never give up, but I know for millions of people that will be met with just a sigh of cynicism. Speaker 3: The last I heard, Israel already controls something 40 to 50% of the territory in Gaza City. They've been warning people to get out for at least a couple of weeks now. Hamas have been stopping people at checkpoints and turning them back and shooting them if they don't stay in the city to be used as human shields by Hamas. So that's the current situation on the ground. Speaker 0: What other feedback or criticism would you have about this situation? I I know that it's impossible for anyone to listen to everything that you ever say, but looking at this from a American perspective, what else would you say things could have been handled differently? Maybe on the PR front, maybe also just on a a conduct front. Where where would you say as an outsider with things that could have been handled better, more efficiently, or with more precision? Author Ben Shapiro, author of Lions and Scavengers. We're gonna get to that in a second. I have one or two other questions on Israel. I think it's very important for our audience to hear this, though, because there is a an incessant campaign. And one thing a friend said to me interestingly, which is, okay, Charlie, we've pushed back against the media on COVID, on lockdowns, on Ukraine, on the border, on so, like, maybe we should also ask a question. Is the media totally presenting the truth when it comes to Israel? Just a question, you know, that maybe we shouldn't believe everything the media says because I know I've been conditioned to ask a lot more critical questions over the last couple of years. So, Ben, some people would accuse Israel of wanting to ethnically cleanse. Some people in the Israeli government are saying again, it's all over the place. Right? You have opinions all over. In your opinion, what would a good outcome five years from now be, and how does one respond to the claims of ethnic cleansing? Speaker 3: As far as your earlier question about what we believe from the media, one of the things that I find kind of astonishing in in some of the folks on the right who are highly critical of Israel is actually the the lack of credit the the lack of skepticism when it comes to legacy media. Legacy media are radically anti Israel overall. The New York Times can can certainly not be accused of being a pro Israel outlet. It'd be very difficult to make the accusation that the the Associated Press, which has wore hand in glove with Kamas for years or Reuters, that the these are these are wildly pro Israel outlets. And yet when it comes to the reporting, it seems to be sort of the the opposite. So the the perception of the legacy media is, like, owned by the Jews. Speaker 0: I was gonna say Ben. I'm pro Israel. You Jews own the media, Ben. So, I mean, come on. As you could tell by all the wonderful headlines you guys get. Speaker 3: Well, I mean, dude, the accusation that that we own the media has not prevented, you know, the Daily Wire from from employing people who radically disagree with me on all of these matters. I mean, I don't agree with Matt Walsh on foreign policy. Matt, obviously, is a major host over at Daily Wire. And that's just my shop when I'm I'm I'm overtly pro Israel. Right? I I'm not making any bones about this. I'm a Jew, and I'm a Zionist. I'm not gonna pretend that that to to say otherwise would be absolutely silly. To to suggest that that a some sort of atheistic Jewish person by birth who does not care about Judaism or Israel owning the New York Times means the New York Times is pro Israelis to ignore literally every bit of coverage they have ever done for my entire lifetime. Speaker 0: We we we're we're running out of time here. But just last question on this, Ben. I know this might be a a tougher question, but Beebe said, quote, I didn't like how he said this. I'll be honest. You can't be MAGA if you're anti Israel. I don't like it for a couple reasons. How how did you how did you analyze that statement from Beebe? Speaker 3: I mean and I I think that there is the ungenerous way of interpreting that and then the generous way of interpreting that. So ethnic cleansing, the idea presumably that that population movement is equivalent to ethnic cleansing. I think ethnic cleansing is a term that that's been fairly recently coined to describe population movement during war. And the reality is that's been ongoing for literally all of human history. The idea that that Israel is, quote, unquote, forcing people out of the Gaza Strip, that is not the stated policy of the Israeli government. The idea is if people want to leave, they can, but they're not being forced to leave. Again, moving people out of heavily urbanized areas that are honeycombed with terrorist booby traps pretty much everywhere is not the same thing as, quote, unquote, ethnic cleansing. And I think that ethnic cleansing is is very often used as sort of a a softer form of of the genocide attack. The idea being that Israel is trying to kill everyone, which, of course, is not true. The ungenerous way is to suggest that you have to hold a particular position on every Israeli governmental activity in order to in order to be MAGA, which, of course, is not true. I mean, you can disagree from the right or from the left with with Bibi's policies, and and you can still be plenty MAGA. I think the idea that that Bibi is putting out there is that if you are taking Hamas' side against Israel in a conflict, it is very difficult to align that with the with the stated positions of the Trump administration or what president Trump himself is doing right now. Speaker 0: You you Speaker 3: can't and that much, I certainly is true. Speaker 0: You cannot look. I I think you can have disagreements on Israel and still be MAGA, obviously. You should be America first. But if you're pro Hamas, you're something darker. Speaker 1: You and I are both supporters of Israel and Yeah. Have defended Israel since the beginning of this conflict and and spoken out about the antisemitism that has erupted on these college campuses many, many, many, many times. And something's happening, though, with this whole debate that is really bothering me, and I wonder if you're feeling it too. So I I mean, I genuinely believe you'd be hard pressed to find somebody in the public eye who's been as outspoken a defender of not every move Israel's taken in the war, but of Israel's right to defend itself and of the the just backward awfulness that we've been seeing on college campuses and the backlash against American Jews, then yours truly. I mean, I have been at the pointy end of the spear on this. And I Speaker 0: completely agree with that. Speaker 1: And I it was all heartfelt, and it remains heartfelt. Speaker 0: Yes. Speaker 1: However, however, I my contention here is that some in the pro Israel camp are so knee jerk about calling you antisemitic or getting deeply offended if you say anything that doesn't align with their narrative that it undermines their own cause. And I have to tell you, I find it very irritating because I do feel like some of us have earned the right to have some credibility on the subject of Israel and don't wanna be called those names when we have some mild pushback on some of the overreaches, whether it's, you know, whether they're winning or losing the propaganda war right now. And my contention is they've begun to lose it. And I realize it's propaganda coming at us from Hamas, but they their their numbers have turned. Here in America, they've turned. Not so much with Republicans, a little bit with Republicans, but but completely with the Democrat party and with independents. They they have shifted mightily from at least double digits highs to single digit lows now with the with when it comes to approval. And, also, with respect to you and I speculated about this at the Turning Point event, whether the possibility of Jeffrey Epstein possibly being a Mossad agent or asset or affiliated with, that's been turned around on me too to you must be anti Semitic. What the hell? That's such bullshit. Speaker 0: I Speaker 1: The same people who say, you can criticize Israel. That's fine. We won't call you anti Semitic if you criticize Israel. Turn around immediately and say, you're anti Semitic for even raising that. I completely reject that, and I've raised this as a pushback against my friends on that particular strain of the aisle to watch it because you don't wanna alienate people who are openly your friends by going nuts in your crackdowns on mild pushback on anything related to Israel. Now you Speaker 0: take it. I'm so I'm I'm so glad you brought this up. And I would second that. Megan, I think I have a bulletproof resume showing my defense of Israel both on campus, on social media, to to great, you know, let's just say mockery and scorn at times where because I believe it. Right? I I believe in the scriptural land rights given to Israel. I believe in fulfillment of prophecy. And again, I'm not a theologian, but I'm a Christian. My life was changed in Israel. The spiritual energy is so amazing there. I I want them to win. I've said that repeatedly. Same. And however, Megan, you're hitting on something very potent and important. Now let me first say, I don't wanna judge an entire group because there's been many people in the per Israel world that have been very sweet, very kind, very nuanced, very Charlie. You know, you're with us. You don't have to agree all the time. However, and I and I will say this, the behavior by a lot, both privately and publicly, are pushing people like you and me away. Not like we're gonna be pro Hamas. Not like we're gonna but we're like, honestly, the way you are treating me is so repulsive. I have text messages, Megan, calling me an anti Semite. I am learning biblical Hebrew and writing a book on the Shabbat. I honor the Shabbat, literally the Jewish Sabbath. I visit Israel and fight for it. And there's another article out in the Times of Israel today. I could read it on air. I was just reading before I got on. Charlie, what are you doing? Like, why are you what am I doing? I'm sorry. Like, let's just take a step back here. Like, I'm an American citizen. Yes. I want Israel to win. Yes. I'm a Christian. But, like, the sum of the mess and you saw I mean, you've seen how I've been treated, Megan, by some, not all, by some. Speaker 1: No. It's very irritating. It's it's been so unfair. They they were coming after you after a turning point for among other things. They had Dave Smith there. Dave Smith isn't allowed to criticize Israel. You had both sides. The the Israeli side was overrepresented. Speaker 0: No. You're not allowed to. It's even worse than that. Again, I would just wanna repeat for the fifth time. I love Israel. I want Israel to win. But my moral character is now being put into question, Megan. Not my decisions. Not like, hey. Are you doing this? Is it smart or is it dumb? But no. I am a bad person if I do this. And it's a I I could go I mean, I you saw it, Megan. It was trending on Twitter. Thousands of tweets and text messages. And if I were to be charitable and generous, I will say, the people that are attacking me are in a hyperparanoid state because they're at war, and war tends to make things black and white, and you're a hammer looking for a nail. So I'm trying to be charitable, Megan. Literally, I'm trying to cut as much slack as I can. Right? They go, okay. What would it be like if all of a sudden I'm starting to see a pattern of behavior similar to what my grandparents saw in nineteen thirties Germany online? How would I behave? So that's like my charitable kind of over compensation spirit. At the same time, I'm like, but you're it's it's not defensible to be dumb. Right? Yeah. Speaker 1: So And it's offensive. It's offensive to those of us who have been out there defending them in in many instances against critics on our own side. And now you have a couple of comments like, well, what about this? Well, has it gone on too long? Like, is it time to wrap it up? And the thing about Epstein is just so bizarre. I don't know who he was an agent for. It might have been Israel or an asset, or it might have been nobody, but we're allowed to speculate about that. It's like there's some rule. You can't go there when it comes to Israel. Speaker 0: Well, you and I believe that we're Americans and Americans first, Period. End of story. We are citizens of this nation. Okay? That's Israel, we have funded. We have supported. And they're up against a sea of Islamic totalitarianism, and we should be cheering for them. Right? Because they're up against barbarians and and monsters, and we want them to win. However, here is Megan Kelly and Charlie Kirk combined probably 30,000,000 social media followers, like pretty right? And you and I have been holding this down, and you you probably get the negative, oh, you're just shilling for Israel. I'm like, okay. I'm gonna do what's right regardless of the feedback. Right? But then all of a sudden, like, I host a person that I I moderate the debate of, my dear. Right? Right. And I give equal time to Josh Hammer, equal time to a pro Israel advocate, and my moral character is being put into question. And so I I just I think it's a hyper paranoid, like, we're just gonna try to we're we're gonna just stamp out everything type type of practice, but it goes to the point where if, for example, if I I have less ability sometimes online to criticize the Israeli government about backlash than actual Israelis do. And that's really, really weird, isn't it, Megan? Speaker 1: It that's not right. Wrong headed. I I'll tell you this for me. I got some blowback after saying Mossad possibilities with Epstein, a comment behind which I stand. I mean, I really and I've, of course, reported what Alan Dershowitz has said as his lawyer. He says I think he would have told me. He didn't say he had any of those connections. I hear all that. That doesn't mean it's not true. I think all these things should be explored. It's one of the many things that should be explored around Epstein. But saying that and also saying he might be a US asset, etcetera, doesn't make you anti Semitic. That's fucking crazy. And then we get to last week, I go on Piers Piers Morgan. Right? So I go on Piers Morgan last week, and I don't talk about Israel a lot on this show. I just like, covering the day to day of a conflict like this is not my thing. It's not what we do here at the Megan Kelly show. We haven't done it for Ukraine. We haven't done it for Israel. We haven't done it for a lot of conflicts, but we'll talk about it when big things happen. So Piers talks about it a lot. Piers asked me it was a very interesting kinda culture study. So he asked me about the the photos of the starving children out of Gaza. And I said a couple of things, both of which got a fair amount of pickup. Alright. So first, this is what I said about the photos. Listen to Sop 10. Well, I'm always reluctant to put too much stock in the images coming out of Gaza, that that phrase, because they're manipulated, and they're masters of propaganda, and they're fine having their own children starve just as long as they can put them on camera and show them off to the world. That that's Hamas. And, frankly, it's lot of Palestinians, so I'm very skeptical of taking those images at face value and saying it's Israel's fault. Okay. So that clip gets circulating Speaker 0: I'm with you on that. Speaker 1: A mill a million times by my Israeli friends and my Jewish friends online. Like, go, Megan. Yeah. Okay. Great. Cool. Cool. Cool. Yeah. She's right on. Look at her you know, speak truth to Piers. And then Piers released as a as a separate clip my follow-up to that comment. Okay? And and here's that. Speaker 0: Not a lot of nuance, Megan. It's only tribalism. Speaker 1: That's right. So here's sod 11. Israel, whether it realizes it or not, has made itself the villain of the world in in letting this thing go go on so long. They have lost support amongst their dearest friends. And even the entire Democrat party here in The United States has turned against them, and they're losing Republicans by the day here in America, which is their most important ally. So whether the fight continues to be just or not is almost irrelevant. As Trump said when he was running this time last year, not yet elected, time to wrap it up. And that's how I feel too. And I've given Israel a long berth. I fully understand as an American who was attacked on 09/11, my country was that, you know, when you attack The United States and you kill thousands of our citizens, and Israel was in this position on 10/07, it's fine to respond, and it doesn't have to be proportionate. Whoever said it has to be proportionate. But what Israel's doing now is losing its standing with the rest of the world. It's starting to lose too even with its closest friends, its moral reputation, its moral, high ground. And, as Trump said a year ago, time to wrap it up. Cue Well said. The 25 text messages from people I know, like friends who are pro Israel. Like, I'm so sad that you've left us. I'm so sad you let's debate it. You know, many Jewish, advocates think, let me come on your show, and we'll debate. There's nothing to debate. I'm on Israel's side. Just stop. Me observing Speaker 0: I totally agree. Speaker 1: That you're losing the propaganda war and that this has gone on for about two years now. And look. I mean, I pulled the stats. Support for Israel's military action in Gaza by party ID. GOP in June 2024, 76%. Now 71, so they lost 5%. Dems in October 2023, 36%. Now it's at eight. Independence, October 2023, it was 47%. Now it's 25%. You go under 35, you have almost zero support across The United States, your closest ally. I I see what's happening, and it's my job to comment honestly on it. But I am sick of being lectured on, like, you you have to see it exactly as we see it and support everything, or you're you're against us. Speaker 0: So so this is so important, Megan. And, again, I don't want not every you cannot say everyone in the pros are and I don't say it acts that way. But I Right. I got texts about you, Megan. Sam, why is Megan, like, doing the bidding of Hamas? I was like, what are you talking about? Megan's the best. Like, what she's amazing. And I said, why are you texting me about Megan? And I I I at that point and so this is what they don't understand. You and I, Megan, and Tucker is in the same category, and they've tried to go after Tucker. Yeah. Is that the and and the more you attack our moral character, the actually, the more we're gonna double down in the direction because 100%. I don't do it that way. Okay? Speaker 1: Right. Speaker 0: Like, when tell me I'm wrong. Cool. Tell me if I've got my facts wrong. By the way, on the Epstein thing, Naftali Bennett says he was an Epstein agent. We have to be pursuers of truth. They've denied it. Fine. Let's keep digging. Okay. Fine. But the the the the thing that I don't think I think is being lost is, like, on some part of the population, you can scold them into silence. Right? But if I have any deviation of a purity test, any deviation whatsoever, such as hosting a focus group, right, Megan, with a bunch of our students that went viral, having Dave Smith or Tucker at my event, it is all of a sudden, oh, Charlie is a, he's he's no longer with us and all that. So wait a second. What do you mean? What does with us mean exactly? Right? Mhmm. I'm an American. Okay? Like, I I I represent this country, and I I don't even understand that paradigm. But, Megan, I think you would agree at this. I wanna make sure we fast, like, really zero in on this. Personality types like you, myself, and Tucker, the more that you guys privately and publicly call our character into question, which is not isolated. Right? I'm Megan, it'll be one thing if it was one text or two text. It is dozens of texts. Yes. Then we start to say, hold the boat here. And and to be fair, some of my really good Jewish friends are like, that's not all of us. It's all. But these are leaders too though. Right? These are these are stakeholders. Right? And so look. I I'm I'm I'm afraid because again, I want civilization to win. I want the West to win. I don't want the Islam of fascist barbarians to storm the gates of Jerusalem. I want the holy sites protected. I believe in the holy land. I love that Jesus walked on water there and rose from the dead and preached in the, the Mount Of Beatitudes. Like, I I feel the connection to Israel. And I but at the same time simultaneously, when the hostile reaction is that now Meghan and Charlie are enemies. Right. Boy, I'll tell you. Like, you're you're you're you're you're gonna you're not gonna I won't say lose, but you will weaken and just basically deflate two of your strongest advocates if that continues. Speaker 1: Right. And it to me, I laugh because it's like, I've been bullied by the best of them. The best. And it it didn't work, and it's not going to work with them. And the more you try to tell me I can't criticize Israel, the more likely I am to do it, to focus on exactly what you're doing. Right? Like, what what are you doing that you're so defensive? You don't own me. I don't I don't take $1 of money from any Jewish affiliated group. That's not that's never been what my what my show's model. Take you know, Cozy Earth is my sponsor. People like Genucel. Those are the people I take. And I probably would feel reluctant to criticize Genucel, which is a great product, so I probably wouldn't do it anyway. My point is simply, I have my honest opinions, which is why I had credibility for the two years I've been defending them. Right? And I still have that credibility, and I don't need lectures from my friends who are more pro Israel than I am or who are just American Jewish people who are concerned about what's happening. I don't need lectures on my coverage. Okay? I'll call it like I see it. And you have no right to come on this show and demand a debate with me because I've said something you disagree with. It's my show and I'll decide the coverage we do here. Speaker 2: I just have way too many questions that makes me think about what the motives are. And if we go dark, I'll put all those things out there. Yeah. How did how did these guys not know this was taking place? Speaker 0: So I've been in Israel many times. The whole country is a fortress. When I first heard this story, I still had the same gut instinct that I did initially. I find this very hard to believe. I've been to that Gaza border. You you cannot go 10 feet without running into a 19 year old with an AR 15 or an automatic machine gun that is an IDF soldier. Right? The whole country is surveilled. And so let me just kind of go through this. We don't talk about Israeli politics very often, and most Americans don't know this. The last nine months, Israel was on the brink of civil war. It's not an exaggeration. This judicial stuff, there were there were hundreds of thousands of Israelis taking to the streets because Bibi Netanyahu was basically redefining the Israeli constitution. That's not an exaggeration. Right? He said the judicial branch has too much power. There were protests planned this week against Netanyahu where they anticipated tens of thousands of people to take to the streets. That's all gone, Patrick. Netanyahu now has an emergency government and a mandate to lead. I'm not I'm not willing to say to go so far that saying that Netanyahu knew or there was intelligence here, but I think some questions need to be asked. Was there a stand down order? Was there a stand down order? Six hours? I don't believe it. Israel's the side of New Jersey. When I took a helicopter ride from Jerusalem to the Gaza border, it's forty five minutes. Wow. Six hours. They're livestreaming the killing of Jews. Was did somebody in the government say stand down? That is a legitimate non conspiracy question. The whole country is the IDF. The whole country is. Yeah. And you're trying to tell me that they're going to concerts and kibbutzes and schools and by reports, six hours. Let's say it's three hours. That's suspect. Go ahead, Rob. Speaker 4: It's also not like a right wing reporting. This is from the New York Times. The long wait for help as massacre unfolds in Israel. I can't think of a more liberal news outlet than New York Speaker 0: Times. And and by the way, I I'm actually very pro Israel. So let me be very I mean Mhmm. So I'm not exactly I think we all are. No. No. I just wanna make sure my position is clear here. But I would so Patrick, there are other explanations. It's possible that the Netanyahu government was double crossed by bad agents. Okay? That's dark, but it's not as dark as what we're talking about. Okay? Another aspect is that Netanyahu might have traitors in his government, like legitimate traitors that have infiltrated. I was texting with some senior people in the IDF and they said, Charlie, can't say too much, but let's just say the same problem you have with the left in America we have here in Israel. So there's something to think about. Just something to think about, right? Is that maybe there are some people within those intel agencies that aren't as sympathetic. Or maybe, Patrick, maybe they might have gotten a tip, they might have gotten whispers, but no one thought it would be 1,200 Jews dead. That's a potential, right? Because here's the essence of it. The essence is this: this is the closest thing to the Holocaust that any of us have lived through. But the fact is now Bibi and the Israeli hard right government has a mandate I've to be careful the way I say this to they're going to try to ethnically cleanse Gaza. I mean, that's and I don't use that term lightly. Okay? They're talking about basically removing 2,500,000 people from there. Okay? And honestly, they have a mandate to go seek justice and revenge. They do. There is This idea that they need to have a truce or a peace treaty, that's morally crap after you see women and children be burned alive and dragged to the streets. But there are some serious questions here, Patrick. And let me tell you, my pattern recognition over the last five years has become pretty sharp. COVID, Maui fires, you know, Epstein. When I see a story and it doesn't click, we're our guts are usually right. I just want to be very sorry to interrupt. I'm saying that's what they're going to be accused of. If there are some people in public life in Israel that Patrick, what did your pilot guy say? I want only Jews in Israel. Right? Okay. That is a form of ethnically cleansing because 20% of Israel is Arab. Correct. Mean, look, here so let me also make sure I criticize both sides. Okay? So I'm gonna criticize the people that, you know, do the paragliding and it's sick. Lindsey Graham is an irresponsible lawmaker for what he's saying. Bombing Iranian oil depots? This thing could get wildly out of control very, very quickly. The last thing America needs is a kinetic war against Iran, an 87,000,000 person country that has a pretty fierce fighting spirit, a country at five times the size of Iraq. Five times the size of Iraq. We're gonna go start bombing oil depots. Yeah. That could get Russia further involved, China involved. Yeah. Look. The Armageddon situation is that for Israel, the Armageddon situation is that they overreact so much that they lose their Arab neutrality. Right now, they have neutrality with Egypt. If they overreact, they could lose that. They have warm conversations. I won't say a peace deal yet with Saudi Arabia. They could lose that. Jordan plays ball because America demands they play ball. They could lose that. Syria, Bashar al Assad, he acts as if it doesn't exist, but that could change in a moment's notice. Right? Lebanon via Hezbollah is already there. They could be all of a sudden dealing with a 15 country invasion of Speaker 2: Israel. Can they handle that? Speaker 0: They have in the past. I mean, the the Six Day War, the Yom Kippur War. The Yom Kippur War, for example, they were invaded from every direction. At the the Balfour declaration, when they were came a country in 1948, every Arab country declared war on them. Yeah. And and they were they almost lost the country. And to their credit, they held it off, and they earned the right to be Israel. I I I The women have no rights The answer is it shouldn't be a top priority of the American government because we have so many problems here to execute a CIA coup d'etat in another country. You have to put sanctions on. You have to put them in check. You have to try to, in my personal opinion, allow Israel to seek justice. At the same time, you cannot allow this to turn into a regional broader war. You know why? Because the adult America is gonna have to come clean it up. That's why. If we allow if we just kinda say, oh, it doesn't this thing turns into a regional conflict, we're gonna have more troops on the ground, and we're gonna have to go clean up this mess, as Trump calls it, in the region of sand and death while our own country is disintegrating and collapsing.

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

🧵https://t.co/PvhN9kDdAp

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

Charlie Kirk Show | Sep 3, 2025 (10 days ago) "HUGE Epstein BOMBSHELL! List to Come! But There's a HUGE Twist" In this episode Charlie is explicit that Trump is not in the Epstein files. Even still, he continues to push to have the files released and has been a non stop advocate of the FULL UNREDACTED RELEASE of the files.

Video Transcript AI Summary
From the bitcoin.com studio, the host critiques NBC’s Epstein coverage and the impulse to tie events to Donald Trump. "This was a swing and a miss and a media loss right here." He notes NBC’s question: "Did anybody see or hear of the president himself doing anything inappropriate as it related to Jeffrey Epstein? No." The reply: "No... President Donald Trump was not involved in any of that stuff, period." He warns of a "bandwagon effect" and "half truths" used to extract money, cautioning against Me Too hysteria. He cites "a massive multibillion dollar Epstein compensation fund" and calls it "a big miss for those people that wanted to take out Donald Trump" in a "three ring media circus." He urges prudence and due process, cautioning against dubious claims like "Juliet Bryant is an alleged victim who got money and says she was abducted by a UFO."
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Okay, everybody. We're here at the bitcoin.com studio. That is the bitcoin.com studio. So it's been, I'm a say, a week or two probably since we've covered the Epstein situation. We are covering a lot of other stories. And the media, they they were waiting for this. You see, congress, they brought in a lot of the Epstein victims, and it's undoubtedly terrible what Epstein did to the underage high school girls and groomed them and sexually abused them. They're bringing in all of these Epstein victims. Interestingly, one of them is a man, so I don't that's breaking news, at least to me. I don't quite know all the details surrounding that. And the NBC News thought they have their moment. It is the media. They want nothing more than to be able to tie this to Donald Trump. They bring all of these Epstein victims, one after the other after the other, and they have their big moment. The media is just waiting for a metaphorical kill shot on Donald Trump. Amazingly, if all the questions they could ask, this is the one. But in some ways, I'm kinda glad they asked it in kind of a sick and twisted way. I'm glad they did. I'm glad they were able to air it out because this was a swing and a miss and a media loss right here. And this kinda goes to show that there's a lot of misinformation and half truths that are circulating around this entire thing, especially in the proximity of president Trump, especially. So here it is. NBC News. Ready to go. Try to get Donald Trump. We got him dead to rights. We got the panel. We got them all lined up. This is gonna be it. The NBC producers, they're waiting and they're waiting. We're gonna have our moment. We're gonna play cut 400. Speaker 1: I do have to ask, and I know and it's just something that that I think we're compelled to at this moment with the attention on president Trump, with these questions around a pardon. Did anybody see or hear of the president himself doing anything inappropriate as it related to Jeffrey Epstein? No. Speaker 0: No. No. The answer is no. No. President Donald Trump was not involved in any of that stuff, period. Hard stop. So anticlimactic. No. No. This is cut four zero one. This is another one of the Epstein victims. Several of us as a team of survivors have been discussing creating our own list of names. We know the names. Many of us were abused by them, and now together as survivors, we'll confidentially compile the names. Play Cut four zero one. Speaker 2: Several of us, Epstein survivors, have been discussing creating our own list of names. We know the names. Many of us were abused by them. Now together as survivors, we will confidentially compile the names we all know were regularly in the Epstein world, and it will be done by survivors and for survivors. No one else is involved. Speaker 0: So there is ongoing reporting, though. This is why you gotta be very careful with this stuff, everybody. You saw this with the Jerry Sandusky case in Penn State. You gotta be very, very careful with situations like this because you can get a lot you can get a bandwagon effect where a lot of people use half truths to be able to get money from a guy that obviously had a lot of assets. So you gotta you gotta have a lot you gotta pursue evidence. But you saw right there with the other previous clip. I just gotta replay this anticlimactic one. You gotta see this big wind up from NBC. We gotta replay cut 400. Replay cut 400. Speaker 1: I do have to ask, and I know and it's just something that that I think we're compelled to at this moment with the attention on president Trump, with these questions around a pardon. Did anybody see or hear of the president himself doing anything inappropriate as it related to Jeffrey Epstein? No. Speaker 0: It's I could I could watch that on repeat. That that's the entire media narrative poof. By the way, if the answer was yes, we would have heard this years ago. Biden would have been sitting on files that showed Donald Trump compromised with anything Epstein. They would have released this a long time ago. And I'm just gonna be honest with a lot of these movements that we see. We saw this with Sandusky. We saw this with others. And Michael Tracy on Twitter, quote, the British model and socialite who stayed in contact with Jeffrey Epstein into her thirties and who was ruled by a judge to have endured no illegal sexual activity is currently speaking at the big Epstein press conference. You get a lot of hanger ons. You get a lot of bandwagon effect. You get a lot of people in moments like this that are gonna try to either get money or try to ruins peep ruin somebody's character, and especially they'll try to ruin Donald Trump's character. And you saw in NBC, they can't even do that. You gotta use discernment. You gotta use prudence. So you gotta stay very cautious. Remember the lessons of the Me Too movement, and remember Kavanaugh. Remember all of that. And just another one. Again, a a lot of the people I'm sure that are presenting at this press conference were harmed and have terrible situations of them. Others, Juliet Bryant is an alleged victim who got money and says she was abducted by a UFO. It's quite a claim. In situations like this, I am coming at this from a perspective. Number one, they're gonna try to they're gonna try to smear and slander president Trump completely unnecessarily here. You saw this with the fake Wall Street Journal piece. You now saw this with the whole panel. Nuh-uh. Donald Trump wasn't involved. By the time the show ends, another American family farm will shut down. Not because they stopped working, but because a lot of grocery store meat doesn't come from them anymore. Over 85% of the grass fed beef in The US stores is imported, and most people have no idea. That's why I get all of my meat from goodranchers.com. Good Ranchers doesn't just sell meat, they guide you back to the source. All Good Ranchers products are a 100% born, raised, and harvested in The USA from local family farms. And with summer in full swing, there's nothing better than good food shared with your friends and family. Whether it's burgers by the pool, steaks on the grill, or nuggets for an easy meal, make sure you're serving America's best meat this summer. Plus, if you subscribe to any good rancher's box today, you'll get your pick of free meat for life. That's free Wagyu burgers, hot dogs, bacon, or chicken wings in every box for the lifetime of your subscription. And if you use my exclusive code Kirk at checkout, you get extra $40 off your first box. Once again, visit goodranchers.com. Use my code Kirk to get your free meat for life plus $40 off. Goodranchers.com. American meat delivered. But additionally, we're starting to verge in the territory on this story the way that it's going right now where this is way too me too. Where, okay, you're abducted by aliens, and you were kind of like in your thirties who was ruled by a judge to have no illegal sexual activity. And and so this is bad for two reasons. It's bad because the young ladies who were actually abused by this monster, Jeffrey Epstein, are now gonna be looped into some of these liars, and that's bad. And then number two, it's also just bad on its merits. There can be a temptation to rush into blind trust and a lack of healthy skepticism. A lot of Jeffrey Epstein victims were adults, and that distinction is important. Not all of them. Jeffrey Epstein absolutely also engaged with underaged people as well. I don't know if it's both men and women, but men seem to be part of the panel, but at least women. My take right now and my approach, and I this is my contribution to the zeitgeist, is I cut my teeth. I have the wounds to show during the Me Too movement. During the Me Too movement, I learned a lot. We saw the whole country lose its mind during mass hysteria. So let's not do that again. We need empirical data, and especially if there are people like Michael Tracy tweets, this British socialite, who a judge endured no illegal activity and stayed in contact with Epstein into the thirties into her thirties. Guys, that's not someone that I think we should be platforming, and we just want the truth. And a lot of this, again, it undermines the actual victims, and then you have a gold rush. And that's the problem. This happens way too often in situations like this, is you see a gold rush. San you from Sandusky to I I guess, like, 50 examples. The Weinstein case, by the way, Harvey Weinstein is a great example. Candace Owens has done some actually very interesting reporting on this. I don't know if I agree with all that she's actually really made me reconsider. But the point being is that you have a gold rush in situations like this where you have real victims at the core who deserve restitution and deserve justice, and then you have people on the exterior who present themselves as real victims either for attention or money. But the key today and the big takeaway is that this was a major swing and a miss for the media. They wanted to try to take out Trump. The democrats are desperate for a new narrative. And in the most anticlimactic lead balloon way that I've ever seen on live television, no. Wasn't involved. No. We're gonna keep analyzing this, but I we're now starting to see the ghosts of me too past start to seep into this, the language, the terminology. And I think we gotta learn our lessons from the Kavanaugh, from the guilty until proven innocent stuff that we saw. And that's not to say that every one of these individuals is like that, but Juliette Bryan who got money and said she was abducted by a UFO, I mean, that's an interesting claim. Love to learn more about that. We're cautious as we should be because you're dealing with people's, not just reputation, but you're dealing with the truth. And what you do not want, what will invalidate the actual abuse of these victims and the treacherous elements of this, whether it be intel agencies or all the other stuff, will be a bunch of opportunists that gold rush into this in a me too way to try to get cash or try to get clicks. Try to get cash, try to get clicks. Like this British socialite model. I don't know who this person's name is. Michael Tracy's reporting. You guys can look at all Michael Tracy's stuff at M Tracy. You gotta be prudent. You gotta be cautious. But at least my instinct feels a little bit too much like the Weinstein, the Kavanaugh. This whole thing is starting to raise some red flags for me, guys. It's starting to feel like much more of a a operation that we traditionally would ask questions about. It's kind of turning into a a three ring media circus. When there is money to be made by accusing people, accusers will appear. So we need to be cautious. We're gonna call balls and strikes as hard evidence emerges. The big takeaway today is that this is a big miss for those people that wanted to take out Donald Trump. And final point, there is a massive multibillion dollar Epstein compensation fund. There is a high incentive for people to say they were victims of him. There were real victims of him. A 100%. But now we're verging on we're we're blurring some lines like this one socialite who was a judge ruled no illegal sexual activity, was an adult when they when she engaged with Epstein, and stayed in contact through his thirties. We do not want hysteria. That's bad for everybody. We are anti hysteria and anti panic. Email us freedom@CharlieKirk.com. The final point is many of them then want to extract money from wealthy people who undoubtedly get embroiled in the coming fallout. I don't know. This is raising some antennas here. Got a little red flags going on here because I live through the nonsense and the carnage of me too. Let us not participate in that kind of circus. Let's be prudent. Let's look at the evidence. Let's weigh it. Give everybody due process. And that's our take. Big swing and a miss for those trying to take out Donald Trump.

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

🧵10 Minutes of the clip the media is spinning as not "not Charlies words".https://t.co/sMKQ0NDXmR

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

This episode is being scrubbed form the internet. The Charlie Kirk Show November 16, 2023 Please Spread/Download/Post🧵(UPDATING)

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker proclaims the 'win for liberty' and the 'liberation of Twitter' as a victory for truth and shaping the narrative against the 'uniparty regime.' Elon Musk is praised as a hero who enabled open speech and the ability to question narratives. He discusses a controversial ad showing a white father telling his son to confront anti-Semitic posts, and notes Elon Musk's reply to a commenter: 'you have said the actual truth.' The controversial tweet quoted in the discussion states, 'Jewish communities have been pushing the exact kind of hatred against whites that they claim to want people to stop using against them.' The segment cites Tucker Carlson asserting that 'Jewish Americans have primarily been financing cultural Marxist ideas.' The host adds, 'It is sloppy. It is shallow. It is wrong and repulsive to call a great man Elon Musk an anti Semite,' and argues 'Intentions mean next to nothing here.'
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hello, everybody. Radio stations across the country. Honored to be with you. You can email us as alwaysfreedom@CharlieKirk.com and subscribe to our podcast. Excellent event last evening in Reno, Nevada. It's great to see so many of you. I cannot emphasize enough. The win for liberty, the win for humanity that the liberation of Twitter has meant for all of us. It's remarkable. Liberating Twitter from what it once us was to what it is now is a win for the narrative. It's a win for truth. It's a win as we try to fight back against this uniparty regime, the tyrants, and the authoritarian dictators that are running the country. Elon Musk, even if they shut down Twitter today, will go down as a major hero for allowing us to be able to speak, to question narratives, to get the truth out. Elon Musk got himself in a little bit of trouble yesterday. Elon Musk responded to a tweet that I actually don't think the tweet is that smart. I think one part of it is legit. But I think another part of it is not so great. But the essence of what Elon was responding to is a major thought crime in America. That the world's wealthiest man would comment on this is historic. So here's the tweet, and it's responding to a video. And the video was basically, a white father with his white son saying to his son, hey, you think that, you know, you're posting online all this anti Semitic stuff. Why don't you go and say this to these Jewish families face? Pretty powerful advertisement. This is the ad. Okay? It's about a minute long. It's a powerful ad. And then a person on Twitter responded to this advertisement, and then Elon responded to the person responding to the advertisement. It's important. Bear with us. Because right now, Elon Musk is being targeted like never before. Elon Musk was supposed to speak at a summit today, and he's been canceled. They don't wanna hear from Elon Musk because they are tarring and feathering him as an anti Semite. They've come after this program for calling us anti Semites. They're coming after Elon Musk for calling, they're calling him an anti Semite. So here's the advertisement. It's a powerful ad. Play cut 79. Speaker 1: I saw what you've been posting. Hitler was right. I didn't teach you that. You hide behind your screen, spewing all this hatred and ugliness. You got something they wanna say? Get out of the truck and say it to their faces. Speaker 0: Okay. So that that advertisement then was responded to by this person, the artist formerly known as Eric. Quote, okay. Jewish communities have been pushing the exact kind of dialectical hatred against whites that they claim to want people to stop using against them. I am deeply disinterested in giving the tiniest swear word, let's just say tiniest crap, now about Western Jewish populations coming to the disturbing realization that those hordes of minorities that support flooding their country don't exactly like them too much. You want truth said to your face? There it is. Now let me just say, this is not is not a very well written tweet. I said it's very confusing. I'll go through what they're basically saying here. Half of this tweet is true, half of it I don't like. You want the truth said to your face? There it is. Elon responds and he says, you have said the actual truth. Now we don't know what part Elon is saying is the actual truth. So let's go through this. Again, it's double negatives and misuse of the word disinterested. It's a strange tweet that Elon pinpointed on here. But the first part is absolutely true. Let's go to this. Jewish communities have been pushing the exact kind of hatred against whites that they claim to want people to stop using against them. Now I don't like generalizations. Not every Jewish person believes that. But it is true the Anti Defamation League was part and parcel with Black Lives Matter. It is true that some of the largest financiers of left wing anti white causes have been Jewish Americans. They went all in on woke, and it wasn't just ADL. It was some of the top Jewish organizations in the country that have done that. In fact, we have seen this with the recent retreat of Jewish donations that are no longer going to be administered to colleges. Right? Mark Rowan, Leon Kaufman. Can we get that full list? It's very powerful. The part of the so that's totally true. And by way, Tucker Carlson reinforces this. So I'm gonna kinda it was quite a day on the Internet. Tucker Carlson was inter interviewing Candace Owens. We have Candace Owens coming up next hour, and Tucker Carlson mentions that Jewish Americans have primarily been financing cultural Marxist ideas. We said this, by the way, last week, and people came after us. We came we actually said it in a different way. We said, I'm glad that Jewish Americans are reconsidering their financing of cultural Marxism, and people misunderstood it intentionally and slandered us as being anti Semites. But listen to this: Tucker Carlson is completely correct by saying this, that the philosophical foundation of anti whiteness has been largely financed by Jewish donors in the country. Play cut 92. Speaker 2: However, then I thought, well, wait a second. If the biggest donors at, say, Harvard have decided, well, we're gonna shut it down now. Where were you the last ten years when Speaker 1: they're before? Speaker 2: As Jenna said, you were allowing this, and then I found myself really hating those people, actually. That you're okay with that? On what grounds were you okay with that? Speaker 1: And I this is what I've been trying to explain to the pro Israel lobby that what you were seeing is lack of support. It's people that are asking the question is where were you Yeah. As we have endured all of this. You were paying Speaker 2: for it, actually. Speaker 1: Right. You were Speaker 2: paying for it. Speaker 1: You were you were paying for it. Speaker 2: You calling my children immoral for their skin color. You paid for that. Speaker 1: Yeah. And I So Speaker 2: why shouldn't I be mad at you? I don't understand. Speaker 0: So what what Tucker is saying is similar to part of the tweet that Elon isolated. That is true. That let's just say liberals, but that includes Jewish financiers of liberal causes didn't really care about University of Chicago having courses that saying, you know, the problem with whiteness. They didn't really care about American Express saying that we must eliminate whiteness. They didn't, in fact, they were supportive of it. A lot of liberals were okay with critical race theory, diversity, equity, inclusion. ADL went all in on the BLM type narrative, and ADL is one of many different organizations that were perfectly fine with the growing anti white wave. Now, to be clear, many of these Jews did not fully understand what they were financing. Their intentions were probably pretty good. As we've said, intentions mean next to nothing here. And I'm sure some of the intentions weren't so good, but let's just attention to the side. I'm not that interested in intentions. I'm interested in actions. Okay? Intentions are very hard to pinpoint. We get too caught up in the conservative movement on intentions. I learned this from the great Dennis Prager, who says stop focusing on intentions, focus on the actions. It's a much better way to judge whether or not something is right or wrong. Intentions, as I've said before, and there's a video that went viral, the Nazis thought they were doing good. They convinced themselves that they were doing good, when in reality, they were doing some of the greatest evil in the history of the species. So, Hamas thinks they're doing good. I could go through all this, but they're doing evil. So I'm not convinced that somebody's intentions are what matter. Many Jewish financiers culturally given money to George Washington University, Columbia, Yale, Dartmouth over and over and over again, hundreds of millions of dollars, billions of dollars, financing many nonprofits that many of them are now recognizing and realizing this was a bad idea. So I'm gonna build this out because the second part of the tweet I don't like, and it ties into some news that is not so good for AOC. It's not good for Ayanna Pressley. I'm gonna isolate that in just a second. But let me just say before I talk about my Patriot supply. It is sloppy. It is shallow. It is wrong and repulsive to call a great man Elon Musk an anti Semite. It cheapens the label of anti Semitism. It is not good for anybody.

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

🧵Steve Bannon Event https://t.co/GJie222tgI

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

Charlie Kirk Show | Jul 11, 2025 "Steve Bannon Goes On EPIC Ultra MAGA Rant on Epstein & Deep State" Guys...it doesn't get anymore obvious than this. I'm putting together all the pieces but stuff like this is literally everywhere. For the past 6 months or more Charlie has been pushing for the release of the Epstein files while directly tying it to mossad. If these connections aren't taken seriously and investigated... That should be all the confirmation you need. Steve Bannon has been talking about running for president recently. Keep your eye on Bannon. I have a feeling he's next. Get to it and spread it before it's deleted. Go to YT and Kirk's channel and filter Epstein. Spread everything.

Video Transcript AI Summary
"God Bless America Again." "Alan Jackson Ministries is working hard to bring back biblical truth back into our culture." "Go to alenjackson.com/charlie for free shipping on God Bless America." "There's only one way to fix this." "Two or three action steps by Sunday afternoon." "I think it's special prosecutor ever." "The Epstein is some the question's very simple. Who governs this country? The American people or the deep state?" "Tom Fenton is not a lawyer." "You name Tom Fitten a special prosecutor." "He brings in a team of actual prosecutors." "There may be some victim issues here." "Would you believe Tom Fitten will release all the documents?" "The three most powerful institutions in Washington DC, the Federal Reserve, the Central Intelligence Agency and CENCOM."
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: When you take time to understand how God has consistently blessed America, pouring his grace and mercy on us over and over again, it will give you hope for the days ahead. We cannot afford to forget our past, good and bad, or we will forfeit the best opportunities of our future. God Bless America Again. This book will sharpen your perspective on what it means to bring God's truth into our nation today. Alan Jackson Ministries is working hard to bring back biblical truth back into our culture. Go to alenjackson.com/charlie for free shipping on God Bless America. Again, that's Alan Jackson, allenjackson.com/charlie. I love what I learned from Alan Jackson, and you will too. Welcome, everybody. We are here at the Student Action Summit in Tampa, Florida, and look at this crowd that we have here. Look at this. That's as good as it gets. We are here with Stephen K. Bannon. Steve, you've just been yelling for the last two hours. You you're pretty fired up about this Epstein thing. I I just got a call from someone in Washington. Let's not say his name. But he was like, wait. Speaker 1: A very dialed in guy. Super dialed in. Really super dialed Speaker 0: in. He's like, wait. Is this Epstein thing kinda big? I thought it's over. And Speaker 1: so first of all They think it's over because the media had eight minutes of president Trump as 20 questions and didn't mention it once. So even president Trump thinks it's over. Speaker 0: And so, Steve, what is your recommendation, your suggestion on how to fix this? Speaker 1: There's only one way to fix this. We have to come out of Tampa just like the Patriots did on doing like the Boston resolves. We have to come out with the Tampa resolves. Two or three action steps by Sunday afternoon. We're all committed to, all of us, to say this must happen, and I think it's special prosecutor ever. But we have to say no more nothing. We have to go forward with this. And the reason we're going forward with this, we're there to assist and augment president Trump, to help save president Trump's presidency because they are coming for another coup. You can see it happening. Just like the dark clouds were around Kennedy. Right? They they moved in and moved in and moved in. They assassinated him in in in Vietnam, and then they blew his head off in the middle of the day in in Dallas, Texas with a patsy named Lee Harvey Oswald that we find out sixty two years later was on the payroll of the CIA as they looked your parents in the eye and lied to them for sixty years. They're gonna lie about everything today and hope that seventy years from now nobody will care about it. Do you care about it? Yeah. If we don't come out of here united with Turning Point, as powerful as Turning Point is, if we don't come out of here and say, no more, more, we must have this because if we don't take down the deep state, we're gonna lose the entire country, and they think they're winning. They're laughing at us right now. They're laughing at you. They're mocking you. This is the Epstein is some the question's very simple. Who governs this country? The American people or the deep state? Do do they have do they have the consent of the governor on what they're doing right now? I hear a lot of talk. Speaker 0: Now now Speaker 1: see some action. Speaker 0: Now now, Steve, so special prosecutor, who would you recommend, and what does that scope look like? Because special prosecutors can be kind of a dead end sometimes. Speaker 1: It can't be. My recommendation right now would it be Tom Fenton. Tom Fenton is not a lawyer. He can hire all the lawyers. Is Tom Fenton have credibility with everybody? If Tom quit and Fitten looks you in the eye after everything he's gone through and fought for and said, here's what it is. Would you believe Tom Fitten? Would you believe Tom Fitten will release all the documents? It's very simple. You name Tom Fitten a special prosecutor. He brings in a team of actual prosecutors. You go to the court, and the first thing you do is petition the court to unseal all the sealed evidence. Right? Yeah. Number two is you take collect all the other evidence, not just from the FBI and the justice department, from every agency in our government, and you put it forward. Right? By the way, there may be some victim issues here. It just that's gonna have to be dealt with. You're gonna have to deal it. Do you guys wanna see everything or just some things? Yeah. Everything. You wanna see everything? Yeah. And you're prepared to take the accountability if that happens? Yeah. Are you? Yeah. You? Yeah. You gotta do a gut check. That's why we need these resolves this weekend. You do that. Also, the special prosecutor has a second mandate, and that is to be able to impanel a federal criminal grand jury that he can then bring all the evidence he finds if he finds it to the grand jury about the intelligence agencies and the interconnectivity with foreign governments, whether it's British government and MI six, the Saudi government and Saudi intelligence, Mossad and Shin Ben and the Israeli government and the CIA and all the other 17, intelligence apparatuses that you're paying for. He must get to that to see if there's any interconnectivity and who actually governs the American people. Speaker 0: So so, Steve, for people that were watching in the Western Washington press court, in the White House, let's say. They say, why do people care about this so much? Explain it. Bring us into the MAGA mind. Why let's just pan the audience. Raise your hand if the Epstein thing is very important to you. Raise your hand. Can we just show that pan shot really quick, guys? Keep your hands Speaker 1: up. It's a 100%. Speaker 0: Every hand goes up. Some people have two hands up. Speaker 1: It's Speaker 0: 100 but, Steve, why is it very important? This is by the way, this is ultra MAGA 10.2 o. MAGA. It's it's ultra MAGA as it gets. Speaker 1: Number one, it's the crimes against children. Right? The trafficking of children. But number two, it's what that trafficking was used for. Right? They need they have fought this from day one, and this is president Trump's hardest core base. And the only way this goes away, if these people, not just an answer, if they don't see a process that they can buy into, that they think are gonna treat them like adults and get the information to them, you know what they're gonna say? I'm out. I'm out. And if they're out, there is no MAGA movement going forward. Why do you think the press corps didn't answer my question? They hate you. They hate MAGA. They hate the power you have over Washington DC. That's where they're gonna roll over. They want this to go away. They know why because they know that you'll get just, okay, I'm gonna go away too. That's why there's not all the great stuff, the deportations, the tariffs, the economic program. This is why this is so important. And one of the tales you're gonna have, it's what's happening in Ukraine and what's happening in The Middle East. The three most powerful institutions in Washington DC, the Federal Reserve, the Central Intelligence Agency and CENCOM. Right? You've got the money in the brains, you've got the you got the money, you've got the brains, you got the muscle. All three of those must be brought to heel by this audience. The way we bring it to heel is you use Epstein is the tool to do it. We must use that tool. We must use it today. If we don't do it, let's just give up and go play. Let's just hang out. Right? We'll have a concert here for two days and a picnic. Speaker 0: We're not doing that. That's not why we're here. So so Steve, walk us through the mechanics. Can the president appoint a special prosecutor without congress? Speaker 1: He has to get by the way, the way because we use it, a prosecutor has to be the special prosecutor has to be confirmed by congress. But that's what we got the votes to do that. You don't need 60 you it's 51 votes. We control that. You just tell the Republican Party. We basically get online every night and bombard their offices with emails or text messages saying you must do this. Tom Fenton's a known guy. He can get confirmed. Speaker 0: Or Matt Gaetz. Speaker 1: Matt Gaetz would be the best. Speaker 0: How about Matt Gaetz? Would people like Matt Gaetz? Speaker 1: Matt Gaetz is amazing. Speaker 0: That would be a no brainer. Right? Speaker 1: I I think I think what you do I can't focus. I get too broad. I I think I think what you do is a Fenton, a special prosecutor, maybe Matt Gaetz's attorney general. Speaker 0: Yeah. If we I don't think that'll happen with with senate confirmation. But, Steven, closing your Speaker 1: Hold it. There's everybody there's not anybody if the process showed us with Hagsett and Bobby Kennedy and Tulsi, if you fix bayonets, there's nobody we can't get confirmed. Right? You put the fear of God in Joni Ernst. You put the fear of God in Tom Tillis. You put the fear of God in anybody. We can get him confirmed. Maybe Gates is better at holding the ball pin but or Gates for Fenton. He'll be ready for Speaker 0: a line change. I think Gates is right because there will be a line change at some point. Steve, in closing, going into the midterms and beyond, if the anger that I am getting from the audience on Epstein continues, what will that mean politically? Speaker 1: It'll be over, the country will be over and half of you people will be in prison. The other half will be bankrupt. That's why Speaker 0: it's all That's how important you think this is. Speaker 1: This is nothing more important. By the way, tonight at right after the 05:00 show, I'm a do a meet and greet with all of you. So I appreciate it. Speaker 0: God bless. Thank you. Speaker 1: Sure. Is Charlie Kirk the best? Is this guy the greatest warrior we got? Love you guys.

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

🧵Right after Bannon/Kelly events. https://t.co/6gk6UzkNDc

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

July 15, 2025 | Charlie Kirk falls in line, says "I'm done talking about Epstein" for time being. The Plot Thickens Two days after the TPUSA event with Megyn Kelly and the show with Steve Bannon, Charlie got the call from the Trump admin to drop the subject. Charlie did not, despite saying he was done talking about it. Only 10 days ago he was still posting videos about the Epstein files and I've found him bringing it up at least 5 Times since then. He got the call after the event with Steve Bannon in July but chose to post the video 11 days ago tying Epstein to mossad and calling out the Trump admin for being complicit with the deep state if they don't investigate it. Around the same time Charlie and Steve did their event Bannon was floating the idea of running for president in 2028. Link in 🧵 (It's from the lib media but it's still worth watching).

Video Transcript AI Summary
The White House said the president's entire team would continue to work in, "lockstep." Despite a feud involving Bondi, Patel, and Bongino, Bongino was back at work, and Trump said he spoke to him earlier and thought Bongino was "in good shape" in his current position. Charlie Kirk: "Honestly, I'm done talking about Epstein... I'm gonna trust my friends in the administration... balls in their hands." Laura Ingram scolds conservatives for discussing it. Greene described the handling as "a full reversal" and Fuentes said "MAGA is dead." Kennedy warned Epstein was a sex trafficker and asked who he trafficked to and why others weren't prosecuted. Overnight, House Republicans voted against a Democrat-backed amendment to publish Epstein documents; Ralph Norman was the only Republican on the committee to vote in favor. Ro Khanna pushes the measure to force release, which would publish all documents within thirty days of enactment.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The show that knows there is never a dull moment on the New York City subway. Man, look at that flooding. We're gonna get the forecast in just a few minutes. For now, I'm Ali Vitale on this Tuesday, July 15, and we'll start with the news. The Trump administration is trying to portray a united front as the president continues to face the threat of revolt from his MAGA base over the Jeffrey Epstein files. It comes after telling his supporters to not waste any more time or energy on the deceased convicted sex offender. The White House released this statement yesterday declaring that the president's entire team would continue to work in, quote, lockstep. That entire team piece is important because it comes despite the reported feud involving attorney general Pam Bondi, FBI director Kash Patel, and deputy FBI director Dan Bongino. What's more, Bongino was reportedly back at work yesterday according to CNN after he took Friday off and was rumored to have threatened to quit. CNN also reports Bongino's long term future is still uncertain at this point. Additionally, president Trump told reporters on Sunday he spoke to Bongino earlier that morning and thought Bongino was, quote, in good shape in his current position. We'll see about that, but it comes as some high profile Trump loyalists who voiced concerns over the lack of transparency regarding the Epstein files are now apparently heeding the president's orders and moving on. Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk, who voiced his concern over the Epstein files a mere forty eight hours ago at the Student Action Summit in Florida, now says he's, quote, done with the matter. Speaker 1: Honestly, I'm done talking about Epstein for the time being. I'm gonna trust my friends in the administration. I'm gonna trust my friends in the government to do what needs to be done, solve it, balls in their hands. I've said plenty this last weekend. Speaker 0: Make some noise if you care about the Jeffrey Epstein scandal. Speaker 1: Raise your hand if it matters a lot to you. Raise your hand. So every hand of 7,000 people. Everybody cares. It I think A lot. I said a lot. Every hand. Speaker 0: He did have a lot to say this weekend, but now he's trusting his friends in the government. Fox News host Laura Ingram, who also raised raised questions about the Epstein investigation over the weekend, is now actually scolding other conservative influencers for still discussing it as if she hadn't done so herself. Speaker 2: Now as conservative influencers were eating their own about stein, the president was stealing the show on the one year anniversary of the day he almost lost his life. He made a triumphant appearance at a global sporting event. Meanwhile, Democrats keep shooting in their own goal, stumbling from one embarrassment to the next. How many of you are satisfied you can you can clap. Satisfied with the results of the Epstein investigation. Clap. Okay. I told you to clap. You guys aren't listening. I'm not gonna grade you on a curve. So I was gonna get to that. How many of you are not satisfied with the results of the investigation? Speaker 0: Things change quick. And despite several Trump loyalists now changing their tune and falling in line, there are still some defectors that remain, at least for now. Among them, Republican congressman Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia, who criticized the Trump administration's handling of this case, told The New York Times, quote, it's definitely a full reversal on what was all said beforehand, and people are just not willing to accept it. Right wing influencer, Nick Fuentes, went so far as to say MAGA is dead in response to president Trump's posts, blaming Democrats for fabricating the Epstein files. Fuentes wrote on social media, quote, so now Trump is claiming the Epstein files are a Democrat hoax? LOL. And then there's Republican senator John Kennedy of Louisiana who said this to NBC News yesterday. Speaker 3: Mister Epstein was a sex trafficker. He was a sex trafficker of young women, some of whom were minors. I think it's reasonable for the American people to ask, who he sexed, trafficked these young women to, if anybody besides himself. And if there were others involved, why they haven't been prosecuted. That's a perfectly understandable question. And I think the justice department is going to have to answer it. Speaker 0: Overnight, House Republicans voted against a Democrat backed amendment that would force the justice department to release the Epstein files in full. The house rules committee voted against attaching that amendment to a cryptocurrency bill. Congressman Ralph Norman of South Carolina was actually the only Republican on that committee who actually voted in favor of it. The measure would have forced US attorney general Pam Bondi to publish all documents related to Epstein on a publicly accessible website within thirty days of it being enacted. Democrats say they expected the amendment to fail, but they plan to take advantage of Trump's turn to releasing the documents by driving a wedge between him and his base. They're gonna keep introducing that amendment or that bill, at least according to Ro Khanna, who's pushing it.

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

🧵Charlie Kirk essentially accusing mossad of being the force behind the US political blackmail ring. https://t.co/xHEXqo6LPZ

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

Charlie Kirk directly tying Epstein to mossad...again. Clip from January 2024. Please help me find the FULL.

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

🧵Charlie Kirk's “Security” & Ties to Israel https://t.co/zCr1z8lw4O

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

👀Charlie Kirk's “Security” and Their Ties to Israel (I'm adding “NOT SUICIDAL” to my bio) Charlie Kirk's private security was handled by a detail that sometimes included former Secret Service agents and U.S. Marines. The security team, contracted by his organization Turning Point USA, was led by former FBI agent Greg Shaffer. The internet (and possibly Shaffer himself) is now distancing him from Kirk’s security. If you search for a connection, it will tell you that Shaffer Security Group stopped working with Kirk in 2022. Despite the supposed security expertise, this is Shaffer's comment about the Kirk shooting: “We typically anticipated close-range threats...” There is no proof of any disconnection. A single AP article making that claim yesterday is the only source. You can clearly see that Charlie had the same security personnel in 2022 that he did at the shooting. The people in charge of Kirk’s security essentially did nothing to secure the area or inspect rooftops prior to or during the event, despite the fact that it would have been a simple four-man job that could have included cameras for the event. After the shooting, the crime scene was not secured, and they allowed the staff to simply pack up the area. 🧵 @HarrisonHSmith @IanCarrollShow

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

🧵"Insider Information" @TheGrayzoneNews https://t.co/SyMmtm9Hdh

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

Charlie Kirk refused Netanyahu funding offer, was ‘frightened’ by pro-Israel forces before death, friend reveals.

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

🧵Hours after shooting Full Epstein files release blocked. Spearheaded by Chuck Schumer. https://t.co/PWtN3qal9E

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

September 10th Recap | While You Were Distracted Further evidence against israel. 🕕 18:23 UTC / 1:23 PM CDT — Charlie Kirk event. 🕙 22:17 UTC / 5:17 PM CDT — Senate Republicans block release of Jeffrey Epstein–related documents. Chuck Schumer — Self proclaimed "guardian of israel". Chuck Schumer, as Senate Majority Leader, has been a key figure in blocking or advancing legislation related to Israel and other foreign policy issues in the Senate. 🧵

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

🧵ADL creates a page about israel Kirk connection. https://t.co/onwlC2Pslg https://www.adl.👁️org/resources/article/antisemitic-and-anti-israel-conspiracy-theories-follow-fatal-shooting-charlie https://t.co/Q7eIc9pvbZ

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

The ADL officially "DEBUNKED" israel being involved in the assassination of Charlie Kirk. Right @grok? Isn't that how it works in America? https://t.co/quU1vsvjtP

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

🧵Kirk's "antisemitism". https://t.co/EjrTUHsx3o

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

5 Times Charlie Kirk Made Antisemitic Remarks 🧵

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

🧵TPUSA israel sub domain goes down around the same time as Charlie increases public expression of his issues with Netanyahu, the israeli government and their involvement with Epstein and political blackmail. https://t.co/w1Nl4NKn2Q

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

Charlie Kirk | Curiouser & Curiouser Around the same time frame (July) that the Megyn Kelly, Steve Bannon events happened a subdomain of TPUSA's website (israel.) was removed from the site. This page can still be seen on Wayback Machine. Charlie Kirk(or someone with the authority)removed the subdomain of the TPUSA website that was essentially Charlie backing us israel and explaining why he loves israel. Check it out yourself @waybackmachine

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

🧵Reports surface that Kirk was warned ahead of time he would be shot at an event. https://t.co/gpm1N3y5vl

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

Charlie Kirk Was Warned He Would Be "100% Killed" Before Utah Shooting

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

🧵News outlets begin retracting old accusations of antisemitism.https://t.co/HESKojhq8k

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

🧵NY Times FORCED to retract the statements as not Charlies statements...yet the video shows he was backing up the statement and agreeing. They're saying it wasn't him saying it but rather him repeating what someone else said. They're rewriting the narrative in real time. There is a full campaign to scrub the internet of anything anti israel that Charlie has said and boost his pro israel takes. The ADL already made a full "debunking" page. All of the past accusations of Charlie Kirks antisemitism by the ADL and media outlets are being FORCED to retract their claims.

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

🧵AJC, one of many organizations that began to attack Charlie for antisemitism around the same time he was asked by the Trump admin(or whomever it was) to stop talking about the Epstein files. July 11th https://t.co/XOQFii14xe

@AJCGlobal - American Jewish Committee

Charlie Kirk and Megyn Kelly floated the baseless conspiracy theory that Jeffrey Epstein was a Mossad agent — and admitted they had no evidence. That doesn’t matter, because what people will remember is the lie. This isn’t just irresponsible. It’s a textbook example of how right-wing antisemitism spreads: through conspiracies dressed up as innocent speculation. They gave oxygen to an age-old trope of Jewish control — and in today’s climate, that’s not just offensive. It’s dangerous.

Video Transcript AI Summary
I wouldn't be surprised one bit. I am convinced based on my own sources and my own reporting on this story, he wasn't one of ours. So he was an American, which leads basically three options, MI six, Saudi or Mossad? Yep. Which one would you choose? Well, I mean it's possible that that's the reason everything is getting buried, that there is some treasure trove and it's getting buried because How many people here believe that? Raise your hand. Okay. I'd say about half half the hands think that it's being buried because of an Israeli thing. It could be. I I really don't know. And I no evidence to suggest that. I'm neither.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Do you think there's any intel community involvement in this? Speaker 1: I wouldn't be surprised one bit. I am convinced based on my own sources and my own reporting on this story, he wasn't one of ours. Speaker 0: So he was an American, which leads basically three options, MI six, Saudi or Mossad? Yep. Which one would you choose? Speaker 1: I guess Mossad given his connection to Ghislain Maxwell. Speaker 0: So what does that mean? Speaker 1: Well, I mean it's possible that that's the reason everything is getting buried, that there is some treasure trove and it's getting buried because How many people Speaker 0: here believe that? Raise your hand. Okay. I'd say about half half the hands think that it's being buried because of an Israeli thing. Speaker 1: It could be. I I really don't know. And I Speaker 0: no evidence to suggest that. I'm Speaker 1: just Yeah. No. Me Speaker 0: neither.

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

🧵Loomer attacking Charlie July 13th. https://t.co/x5Wi1rkuaF

@LauraLoomer - Laura Loomer

I don’t ever want to hear @charliekirk11 claim he is pro-Trump ever again. After this weekend, I’d say he has revealed himself as political opportunist and I have had a front row seat to witness the mental gymnastics these last 10 years. Lately, Charlie has decided to behave like a charlatan, claiming to be pro-Trump one day while he stabs Trump in the back the next. TPUSA was only able to thrive thanks to the generosity of President Trump. On the one year anniversary of the assassination attempt on Trump’s life, Charlie hosted @ComicDaveSmith at @TPUSA’s SAS conference where Dave Smith was able to speak to a bunch of conservative youth at an organization that claims to be Pro-Trump. 3 weeks ago, Dave Smith called for President Trump to be IMPEACHED and REMOVED from office over his decision to blow up Iran’s nuclear facilities. Charlie played both sides of the Iran issue on his show as we all saw, because he wants to play to both sides of the aisle. The honorable thing to do is to have a position and actually defend it to the death instead of flip flopping. Smith said all of MAGA “should turn on Trump” and abandon him. He said this 3 weeks ago. See the clip below. 👇🏻 TPUSA is definitely not pro-Trump. If they were, they certainly aren’t anymore. Out of all of the incredible pro-Trump voices out there who support the President, Charlie decided to host Dave Smith? It really is shameful. And I am honestly just disgusted by the nonstop flip flopping on the right.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker says, "Trump listen, man. I I supported him this last year. I apologize for doing so. It was a bad calculation. At the time, it seemed like the right one." He adds, "But he should be impeached and removed for this one." He continues, "And not not on some, like, not not on some ridiculous Nancy Pelosi. Of course, the congress will never do it because they're all a bunch of, you know, corrupt hacks. This is the one thing they support. This is, like, the yeah." He reiterates, "Donald Trump should be impeached and removed for this." "All of his supporters should turn on him." "It's the absolute betrayal of every"
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Trump listen, man. I I supported him this last year. I apologize for doing so. It was a bad calculation. At the time, it seemed like the right one. But he should be impeached and removed for this one. And not not on some, like, not not on some ridiculous Nancy Pelosi. Of course, the congress will never do it because they're all a bunch of, you know, corrupt hacks. This is the one thing they support. This is, like, the yeah. Donald Trump should be impeached and removed for this. All of his supporters should turn on him. It's the absolute betrayal of every

@ComicDaveSmith - Dave Smith

Thank you very much @charliekirk11 for having me at the @TPUSA event today. It was a fantastic event and it’s inspiring to see so many young people who are passionate about the future of our country.

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

🧵Israel still attacking Charlie..https://t.co/ZnOaU8IBOi

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

Even in death Carlie Kirk can't get away from the allegations of antisemitism. Why? Really think about it. 9/11/25

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

🧵Israel Steals HALF A BILLON DOLLARS.https://t.co/yLlzVazsZM https://t.co/KXRrwWpJE7

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

🧵US House Passes Defense Policy Bill, Including Provisions for Israel Military Aid | September 11, 2025 Gotta love them jews. The US House of Representatives on Wednesday passed the annual defense policy bill, authorizing nearly $900 billion in military spending including a slate of provisions aimed at bolstering Israel’s security. Passing by a vote of 231 to 196, largely along party lines, the bill underscores Washington’s continued military and political support for the Jewish state as it wages war against Iran’s network of terrorist proxies in the Middle East, primarily targeting Hamas in Gaza. The National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for fiscal year 2025 includes more than $650 million in direct US-Israel defense cooperation programs and several new policy directives. The measures were praised by the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), which has been lobbying for expanded security commitments. The package includes $500 million for missile defense cooperation, including funding for the Iron Dome, David’s Sling, and Arrow systems, along with bilateral research, development, testing, and evaluation. Another $35 million is directed toward joint emerging technologies, ranging from artificial intelligence and quantum to directed energy and cybersecurity. The bill also earmarks $50 million for anti-tunneling programs and $70 million for counter-drone efforts. Beyond funding, lawmakers moved to extend the War Reserve Stockpile Authority for Israel until 2029, ensuring Israel continued access to US military equipment pre-positioned in the region. The NDAA also requires the Pentagon to provide briefings to Congress on the status of aircraft and air-launched munitions approved for delivery to Israel. Several provisions target international institutions seen as hostile to US and allied forces such as Israel. The bill directs the Pentagon and State Department to work with NATO and major non-NATO allies to block enforcement of International Criminal Court (ICC) warrants against American or allied military personnel. It also prohibits US Defense Department participation in international defense exhibitions that exclude Israeli firms, an increasingly common occurrence in Europe. In November 2024, the ICC issued arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, his former defense minister, Yoav Gallant, and now-deceased Hamas terror leader Ibrahim al-Masri (better known as Mohammed Deif) for alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity in the Gaza conflict. The ICC said there were reasonable grounds to believe Netanyahu and Gallant were criminally responsible for starvation in Gaza and the persecution of Palestinians — charges vehemently denied by Israel, which has provided significant humanitarian aid into the war-torn enclave throughout the war. Lawmakers also mandated new assessments on regional security threats. The NDAA requires studies on preventing Hamas and other groups from using tunnels or maritime routes to smuggle weapons, along with reports on the status of integrated air and missile defense across US Central Command’s area of responsibility. To deepen industrial cooperation, the bill establishes a US-Israel defense innovation field office in Israel and starts a new Defense Industrial Base Working Group to explore opportunities for greater integration between the two countries’ defense sectors. The Pentagon is also directed to continually assess the impact of foreign arms embargoes and sanctions on Israel’s military readiness. The Senate still needs to finalize its version of the defense bill and reach a consensus with the House, before the legislation can head to US President Donald Trump’s desk to be signed into law.

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

@Visuals3rd ...that's what I'm doing.

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

@Critica1Me ⚡️⚡️

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

@PaulioMush Blame Loomer. He's the one that said it's always the jews.

RyanMattaMedia
Posted - September 15, 2025 at 12:11 PM
Saved - September 15, 2025 at 5:07 PM

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

Was Charlie Kirk’s body embalmed at the hospital morgue? Conspiracy theory, most likely debunked. https://t.co/aeha7aMwMz

Video Transcript AI Summary
Lauren the Mortician explains Charlie Kirk's funeral transport: "When Charlie Kirk's body left the hospital, there was a full police escort... a black discrete minivan... a funeral home removal van... and right behind it the medical examiner's car." She notes the autopsy is mandatory in open homicide investigations, with the medical examiner documenting bullet trajectory, tissue damage, and toxicology. Embalming is almost certainly performed to preserve the body for a family goodbye. The casket was carried onto Air Force Two in Utah with Vice President JD Vance helping to bear the weight, flanked by the United States Air Force Honor Guard in blue dress uniforms. Air Force Two is the call sign whenever the Vice President is on board; this is usually a Boeing C-32. There are none publicly documented using Air Force Two for a civilian in this way. Taken together, the hospital removal, the autopsy, the embalming, the honor guard and pallbearers, and the Air Force Two transport form a rare ceremonial sequence.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Alright. So the next conspiracy theory that we'll be about is Charlie Kirk never got involved. There's some grok things. John Collins saying some things. The grok's arguing with himself. And down in the comments is the best place to normally sift through some of this stuff. And I kinda wanna break these conspiracy theories down one by one. So we're gonna get into this one and why I think it's so important. So there's a girl named Lauren the magician over on TikTok. Now she does this for a living. She's an embalmer, and she goes through the entire chain of events and breaks this down. And one thing I just wanna kinda point out, so Charlie Kirk's body was leaving that hospital, and a lot of people are saying, this the odds of them actually putting the right type of vehicles as in, like, the the body examiner or the funeral home director and the actual proper van where they most likely transported his body in. Like, these are key things where if this was a SIOP and Charlie wasn't dead, would they have staged that down to the detail? Would they have expected anybody to actually catch that little type of detail? Speaker 1: A black discrete minivan in the middle. That's a funeral home removal van. And yes, they often look like everyday minivans. And right behind it is the medical examiner's car. Right there. That detail is Speaker 0: And I don't think they would have. So I want you guys to listen to this video. But before we get into it, I just wanna say, like, when we've gone down all of these rabbit holes, I've gone down literally everyone from flat earth to lizard people, guys. All of them. To the moon landing, to the flat earth, the lizard people, to Jewish space lasers, to advanced military technology. And I do think we have advanced military technology. I do think we have zero degree deep zero degree or zero gravity technology. I think we have zero propulsion systems as well. I think that there's a lot more that we don't understand about the world. But when it comes to breaking down this conspiracy theory, the why the reason I've been kinda staying on top of this is because I wanna debunk the shit that we can debunk and go, okay. We got a logical explanation for that. Let's get back to focusing on the shooter. The CCTV footage, guys. That's what we need. We need these freaking cameras. We need the evidence. We need the videos, and that's where the answers lie. Tracking down loose ends and making up more conspiracy theories that just confuse everybody, eventually, people's brains get so fried that they can't process everything. And they're like, shit. I don't know what's real. Don't know what's what. I don't know. I've seen that videos. No. Okay. Let's debunk the shit that we can debunk, and let's stay on top of the shit that we can stay on top of. This shooter is not adding up. This dude is not some trans lone shooter that shot Charlie Kirk with a fucking long rifle from a 142 yards away. That didn't happen. Somebody else was either on that roof or on another roof and that we're not talking about. And we're not gonna talk about it when we're throwing all this shit and just confusing everybody. Speaker 1: Charlie Kirk's casket was carried onto air force two in Utah with vice president JD Vance himself helping to bear the weight. The air force honor guard in full dress uniforms made up the pallbearer team, but before that moment there was a whole sequence of behind the scenes steps that brought us here. Hi, if you're new here, I'm Lauren, also known as Lauren the Mortician, and on this channel we talk about death, funerals, and the behind the scenes details most people never get to see. And yes, today I'm covering Charlie Kirk's funeral transport. I know this is going to upset some people but here's the thing, this is history. Horrible history and I wish it wasn't happening but it is. And my job here isn't politics, It's pulling back the curtain on what these moments actually mean from a death care perspective. When Charlie Kirk's body left the hospital, it didn't happen quietly. There was a full police escort out front, a black discrete minivan in the middle. That's a funeral home removal van and yes they often look like everyday minivans. And right behind it is the medical examiner's car. Right there. That detail is crucial. In cases of homicide, the body does not go straight to the funeral home. It goes first to the medical examiner for a full autopsy. And yes, you can literally see that here. The medical examiner following behind directly confirms it. That and this is my job so I know. And that autopsy isn't optional. In an open homicide investigation, the medical examiner documents everything: bullet trajectory, tissue damage, and toxicology. This isn't just about confirming the cause of death, it's about building evidence for investigators. After the procedure, his remains would have been released to a funeral home. And while I can't say with absolute certainty what happened behind closed doors, in my professional opinion embalming almost certainly took place. Why? Because embalming preserves and restores the body and after a traumatic death, it is the only way a family can have one more goodbye that feels possible. From there we arrive at this moment. If you look closely at those uniforms, those aren't secret service agents or funeral directors holding on to the casket. I mean, he's a funeral director and he's a funeral director. But the people holding on to the casket, that is the United States Air Force Honor Guard. Blue dress uniforms, white gloves, synchronized steps. And alongside them, the vice president himself, JD Vance, physically stepped in as a pallbearer. That is a rare a sitting Vice President personally helping to carry a casket onto Air Force two. It tells you the weight this moment carries both personally and symbolically. Now let's talk about Air Force two itself. The name isn't for just one specific plane, it's a call sign used whenever the Vice President is on board a US Air Force aircraft. Most of the time that's a Boeing C32, Speaker 0: which is Speaker 1: a military version of the Boeing seven fifty seven. I looked and I could not find another case where a prominent civilian has been flown home on Air Force two after death. There are many examples in the military of dignified transfer protocols, fallen service members brought home, autopsy prepared, sometimes flown, transported with honors. But none that are publicly documented using Air Force two for a civilian in this way. That sets this moment apart. If nothing else, it means what's happening for Charlie Kirk is extremely rare. It's not just about grief, it's about how the state is choosing to honor him. With all of these layers of ceremony, visibility, and protocol in a way that hasn't been standard for civilians. So when you put this all together, the hospital removal with the medical examiner close behind, the mandatory autopsy, the likely embalming for the family's goodbye, it's a definite embalming because he had an autopsy and he was murdered. I mean it's for sure. The honor guard, pallbearers, and finally the air force two with the vice president on board, you see the full chain of how this unfolded. This isn't just a funeral story. It's a piece of living history being written in real time.

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

If you are investigating the Charlie Kirk assassination and you are using footage that you downloaded from X. Please watch this video. I’m begging the employees at TPUSA, please post the original footage and please send me a copy of the original footage from the Sony cameras places directly in front of Charlie. With the original footage from any of these videos we can put almost single conspiracy theory to rest. If anyone has original footage from this event. Please message me on X. Thank you.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker lauds Charlie Kirk but shifts to showing how video metadata can reveal manipulation. 'the inspector card shows your your resolution and your frame rate.' He notes a 4K frame size of '3,840 times 2,160' and contrasts it with 'A 150 by 58', showing the clip’s actual size. He says 'everything we film is pretty much in 30 frames per second,' and that 'when you talk about a clip being at 15 frames per second, command I again, you can see we're at 15 frames per second'—implying alteration. They claim: 'This video has already been altered' and 'This has been rendered one time,' then 'reuploaded, downloaded again, reuploaded again.' Uploading to X and re-downloading could 'erase facial details' such as wrinkles. He adds: most iPhones film at 29.97 fps; 'the only device that films at flat 30 frames per second is an actual GoPro'; '60 frames per second' equals '59.94 frames per second,' and compressions degrade quality.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I wanna give this one out to Charlie Kirk, brother. Rest in peace, my friend. Even though we are political adversaries and we didn't see eye eye eye to eye on a lot, I was super excited to see you waking up to what Israel what power Israel has over our country. And there was nobody that was gonna make a bigger impact than Charlie Kirk. Charlie Kirk had the voice of the American youth, and he talked about any revolution, any type of regime change operation that our government's in. The most important part of that operation is the youth, and nobody had an ear of the youth more than Charlie Kirk. So I wanna talk about frame rates, I and wanna talk about resolutions. So when you talk about slowing down clips or people saying, hey. I watched this video. It's in AI. That's that bullet came from the side of the neck. I really wanna show you what they're actually trying to convince you. So check this out. K. So, like, people like Iam, Jen Kolin, do some great work, but I really wanna show you what that means. So take a look at this video. Okay? This is a video I filmed with Ken O'Keefe. And if you hit command, if you open up any video on or any, movie or film on your Mac and you just hit command I, it's gonna bring up your inspector card. So your inspector card shows your your your resolution and your frame rate. So let's just start with resolution. This is because this this is the most crazy. Right? So when we're all watching this video of Charlie, we're like, yeah, man. This video is massive. Right? It's full screen. Okay. Let me open it again and show you. So I open it again and show you. Okay. There it is. Okay. Now look at the resolution. A 150 by 58. But until you see it this way, you don't really you can't really comprehend it. Okay? So we have Ken O'Keefe in here. And if we go up to our settings and we go to sequence settings, we come over here, we can see that we're at 3,840 times 2,160. So that is your your size of your actual frame. Okay? That is that is four k. That is standard four k. Now they do a little bit bigger size for four k, but we'll just go. That was four k in 02/2017. Okay. So you're watching this video, like, yeah. Over here, you're watching the video of Ken and you see the video next to Charlie. You're like, okay. Same size video. Okay. What does that mean though? Now watch when I put the video of Charlie. We come over here and we grab this video of Charlie and we throw it in here. You understand how much smaller this actual video is than this actual video. This is four k. This is what we are watching here zoomed in on zoomed in on zoomed in on. And what does that mean? And now the next thing I wanna show you right here is actual frame rate. So everything we film is pretty much in 30 frames per second. Right? Or 29.97. Now if I grab another clip from say x, let's just go to one other random one I downloaded. Let's check this one out. Okay. This one right here, 30 frames per second. What that most likely tells me is somebody actually put that into a program like Videoleap or CapCut and they re rendered their iMovie and they re rendered it out because most likely the phone that filmed this was filming in 29 frames per second or 60 frames per second. Okay? So when you talk about a clip being at 15 frames per second, command I again, you can see we're at 15 frames per second. So this video has already been altered. Obviously, you can tell by the resolution it's been altered. That's not good. And then it's hard to say, like, yeah, what happened to Charlie Kirk's neck there? We're all doing our best to try to figure this out, but it's hard because that's what you're actually looking at. So you would have to get on a magnifying glass and a microscope and zoom into that, or you're blowing it up and it's looking like this. Now what happens? Now what this means is this has been uploaded to x at 30 frames per second. Somebody downloaded it. They slowed it down by 50% and they reuploaded it. Why is that also a bad thing? Okay. So take a look at every detail on Ken's face. I mean, we can get in there. We can see the wrinkles. We could probably see some nose hairs in there. You can see every facial hair. Now when you look up at the hat, this has been rendered one time. So when you're rendering an algorithm's rendering, it's trying to make the size of that file, right, the the bit rate, the file size as small as possible, especially when it's uploading to Twitter because Twitter doesn't wanna store all that space. So what Twitter does is it looks for any color where there's not much movement. Like, this is all black. So instead of having every pixel be in detail there, if there's no movement, what it's gonna do is it's gonna clump it into one. Take a look at Charlie's hair. Take a look here. You can see a little bit better. You can see a little bit more of a defined hair there. This looks just like one big blob. So what this tells us is this has been reuploaded, downloaded again, reuploaded again. So if I uploaded this to x, downloaded it, reuploaded it, downloaded it, reuploaded it, eventually, you wouldn't be able to see any wrinkles in his face. You wouldn't be the tattoos would start to blur together. All of this would be just one solid blob for sure. And, eventually, it would be so compressed that it would be so blurry that you almost couldn't see anything. So when we talk about is it AI? Was it AI? Was this used? Was that used? Unless we are actually talking about getting the original video in 60 frames per second. That was remember when his ring was changing fingers? And I go, holy crap. You know what's crazy about this and the stuff that they could get away with before that they're not able to get away with now? It's because most iPhones, if you have the settings set right, are filming in 60 frames per second. Most people put them back to 30 because it makes the files twice as big. And if you're trying to if you have an iPhone that doesn't have much storage, you don't wanna waste all that storage and have to delete videos every ten days. So what you do is you change your settings to 30 frames per second or 24 frames per second. When you're watching a movie at the movie theater, 24 frames per second. When you're watching a TV show on TV, 30 frames per second. When you're watching a kid play a video game or stream video games, 60 frames per second because the gamers need to see every little movement. And if the more frames per second you have, the the quicker, every little detail, every blade of grass, every hair, every everything is bigger. And there's more to this too. We can talk about the bit rate next and the codecs, but we won't go down that rabbit hole. This should be enough to help you guys understand. And one last little bit I'm gonna throw in there. Right? Okay. So when you're filming with my Sony a 60 a 6,100 or Sony FX three where I'm filming on my iPhone, it's filming in actually 29.97 frames per second. Anytime you see one that's in actually 30 frames per second, the only device that films at flat 30 frames per second is an actual GoPro. All cameras, all iPhones, almost all actually, well, I just know iPhones specifically. So any iPhone or any devices, any Sony device, we're all filming in 29.9 frames per nine 29.97 frames per second. When you're filming in 60 frames per second, you're actually filming at 59.94 frames per second. Okay? Do you understand that? So if you see a video that's uploaded and it actually says 60 frames per second, most likely that was either shot on a GoPro or it was actually uploaded into something like Video Leaper CapClut, rendered out, then reuploaded to x where it's on x. So that's two compressions. Download it again, three compressions. Do you see where I'm going with this? By the time you have somebody that's, like, editing or trying to zoom in on a clip or anything like that, if it's not the original, it is so compressed that you can't every pixel in that video is not original. The algorithm has compressed it. It's clumped things together. It makes the bullet hole move positions and bounce around. And then when you slow it down from 30 frames to 15 frames per second, there is no such thing as 15 frames per second. When you take a video that's filmed in 30 frames per second, you slow it down by 50%, you are literally losing 50% of your frames every second that you play that video. So it jumps, it skips, it skips, it's I don't know how else to explain it. I hope that made sense for you guys. Drop some comments below. Let me know if you guys are liking these videos. I'm gonna keep working on this angle. I definitely still don't think the dude on the roof is a trans shooter, and he has a boyfriend that wears furry things, and they had butt sex in the congress. Although, was Lindsey Graham's, a sidekick. Forget about that.

@RyanMattaMedia - RyanMatta 🇺🇸 🦅

Was Charlie Kirk wearing. Bullet proof vest when he was assassinated? https://t.co/fz7bgP6qof

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker discusses whether Charlie Kirk was wearing a bulletproof vest and how this could change perspectives. He says he knows nothing about guns but trusts Kyle Sarifen, who walked him through details. In the video, the speaker asks viewers to watch the chest reaction and explains what Kyle showed him. He notes the shirt shows a reaction before any neck hole appears and suggests two explanations for the missing bullet hole: a white vest under the shirt concealing a hole, or a bullet touching the black letters on the shirt. The mic was knocked off by the impact. He argues the shot likely came from the side and was a long rifle; the vest could be breached, with the bullet exiting via the throat after passing through chest structures. Blood splatter could be explained by arteries. He remains not convinced of a trans shooter.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In this video, I wanna talk about was Charlie Kirk most likely wearing a bulletproof vest because this is gonna kinda change a lot of perspectives on how things work. I wanna start this video off by saying I know absolutely nothing about guns, nothing about bulletproof vest, but I do trust Kyle Sarifen. And that man knows more about guns and bulletproof vests and ammunition than absolutely anybody I know. And he's kinda walked me through a few things, and I kinda wanna point out what he was showing me. Check out this video. So what you're watching here, you're gonna watch the reaction. I want you to pay close attention to his chest and the reaction of how this impact were to hit this chest. And I'm gonna let you guys watch it yourself. And then after you guys watch it, I'm gonna walk you through and explain kind of what Kyle was actually showing me and what we think may have happened. So right here, you can see where if we just scroll this back, something is hitting that shirt before it goes through his neck. Right? Something caused his body to react that way before we see the hole in the neck. You see, he was already flinching up. Something had already happened at that point. So if you see these letters, they're kinda hard to see here. But I was like, well, why didn't we see a bullet hole? Well, two things could have happened. Number one, there could easily be a white vest under it. So if a bullet went through, put a hole in the shirt, but the solid white was still there, they got filled in behind it. You might not have seen that bullet hole. Or what I just realized here is you guys have black letters on there. That round could have very possibly touched one of those black letters. It'd be interesting to see. Maybe I'm we're never gonna know, but the shirt looks like after the fact, but he did even have this mic on here. So something hit there and was so powerful that flung this mic off. And that's why say these people that are saying that the guy shot from this side, I don't think it's possible. I mean, is on completely on this side of his neck. His head was turned a little bit this way. There's no way to get that angle of that shot. So what most likely he was wearing was a vest like this was most likely white, and people are well, why don't we see any blood splatter? What we're thinking possibly could have happened was the bullet went straight through the vest, through holes in the chest, hits the spinal cord, hits a bone, and then comes actually ricochets and comes out the throat. And that is what we saw. Was most likely the exit wound was here in the throat and came out. And that would explain if you had this on under the shirt, bullet goes through this, hits something inside, ricochets back out, comes out the top. And then if you what you did notice is it almost looked like blood was coming through the shirt. And and people were saying it was AI because it looked like the blood was coming through the shirt. Well, if you had a vest on the round goes through the vest, that would also most likely, I would think, prevent the splatter. And then it came out up here and it made a giant exit wound. So what we saw was the blood gushing out there because it most likely probably hit an artery up here. I personally think when you look at it from this angle and you start to think about it from this and we we all heard the shot. It was it came down from that upper angle. It most likely was a long rifle and I'm still not convinced of the trans shooter. So let's not even go there. That released the CCTV footage, and then we can put this all to rest. But right now, it looks like he was hit with a long rifle. They went through the vest, which would make sense, came out the jugular. They picked him up and tried to take him, and everybody's like, well, why wasn't there a trail of blood? Well, if his heart was stopped and half of the blood came out in that few seconds on the ground while they tried to get him up and carry him there and his heart was no longer beating as they put him into the vehicle, that would mean he was dead on-site, which a shot like that goes in, severs the spinal cord, which is why you see his hands grip up like that, and then he falls back. He I think he was probably dead on impact most likely. And that's what I think we're seeing here, guys. So crazy side shooters, we walked through it. You know, the short range. No. I'm not saying that there couldn't have been. But, yeah, I don't think there could have been. This seems like the most logical answer. Now I'm not saying that that kid took the shot at all. I would love to see those videos and this whole trans shooter and Discord and this thing is just sounding way too crazy for me to be to to even believe. And there's been so many lies that the FBI has told us already. Like, you can't blame us for questioning these things. But as far as the bullet hole, the vest going through, coming out, like, this all makes sense. And when it comes to this, like, Kyle's Kyle does this stuff for a living, guys. Like, the guy has more guns and more ammo and more weapons and, like, this he eats, sleeps, shits, loves guns. Like, doesn't buy Bitcoin, doesn't make investments, buys guns. And, like, they always go up in value. So, like, they're a better investment than half the things that people that I know have invested in. So can't hate on it, guys. Drop some comments below. Let me know what you think.
AdameMedia
Posted - September 15, 2025 at 11:53 PM
Saved - September 16, 2025 at 5:06 PM

@AdameMedia - ADAM

Charlie Kirk’s security made hand signals the exact moment he got shot. Charlie kirk’s employees silenced eye witnesses. This stinks. https://t.co/psloB82QxY

Video Transcript AI Summary
Hang on. I was standing in probably the third okay. I was standing from probably the third row in the bottom. I saw hit I heard the shot ring out. I looked to my left, and then I looked over to my right. I saw him slump over in his chair forward. He slumped over. He had blood coming from the left side of his neck down his shirt, and he slumped over, and he was carried off. Get off me. Head to off me. Running high right now.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hang on. I was standing in probably the third okay. I was standing from probably the third row in the bottom. I saw hit I heard the shot ring out. I looked to my left, and then I looked over to my right. I saw him slump over in his chair forward. He slumped over. He had blood coming from the left side of his neck down his shirt, and he slumped over, and he was carried off. Get off me. Head to off me. Running high right now.
MJTruthUltra
Posted - September 16, 2025 at 5:37 PM
Saved - September 17, 2025 at 5:00 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared an update about Charlie Kirk, highlighting that George Zinn, who initially claimed responsibility for Kirk's assassination, has been charged with possessing child pornography. I noted that Zinn previously sent a threatening email after the Boston Marathon bombing, which he later dismissed as a joke, and he has appeared in interviews discussing 9/11. I questioned whether his claim of responsibility was a distraction from his legal troubles.

@MJTruthUltra - MJTruthUltra

UPDATE: Charlie Kirk BREAKING - The man who originally took credit for Charlie Kirk’s Assassination, George Zinn, has now been charged with possessing child porn. Life comes at you fast dipshit… ICYMI… • April 15, 2013 George Zinn sent an email threat four days after the Boston Marathon bombing to Marathon Organizers placing bombs at the finish line, which he later claimed was a joke. • He was also used a few times in interviews remembering 9/11. He has now charged for kiddie porn. Was this why he took credit for it/cause a distraction?

@MJTruthUltra - MJTruthUltra

UPDATE: Charlie Kirk 🚨 A Group called "Armed Queers Salt Lake City" (AQSLC) is under FBI Investigation for Possible Foreknowledge of Charlie Kirk’s Assassination • The leader of this group Ermiya Fanaeian, is reportedly a Iranian-born Transgender man, with Biden era State Department ties via a now-scrubbed award from Utah Global Diplomacy for UN Sustainable Development Goals • Armed Queers SLC, a queer and trans-led Marxist-Leninist organization founded in 2020 in Salt Lake City, Utah, focuses on combining LGBTQ+ activism with armed self-defense training to fight capitalism, state violence, imperialism, and promote socialist ideals, trans liberation, and the abolition of prisons and police; the group has ties to broader leftist networks including the Communist Party USA and Democratic Socialists of America. • As part of the National Network on Cuba (NNOC), Armed Queers SLC members joined a May 2025 May Day Brigade trip to Cuba, where they engaged with the communist regime to learn Revolutionary Tactics; in a now-deleted YouTube video titled "Cuba Report Back: Our Time as 2025 May Day Brigadistas," leaders Ermiya Fanaeian and "Connor" discussed embracing "terrorist" labels proudly and plans to apply these ideas to spark a U.S. Revolution. • On September 10, 2025—the same day Charlie Kirk was assassinated—the group deleted its Instagram account and scrubbed related content, including the Cuba trip video, in what is believed be be an apparent effort to hide its online footprint; archived versions reveal posts promoting armed protection of queer communities, and this clip where Ermiya Fanaeian states, “If we’re terrorists, we’re proud terrorists” This Video https://rumble.com/v6z0z78-armed-queers-salt-lake-city-aqslc-is-reportedly-under-fbi-investigation.html Sources Used: @JustTheNews @laderechadiario Just the News https://justthenews.com/nation/extremism/armed-queers-trains-radical-marxists-shoot-just-miles-where-charlie-kirk La Derecho News https://derechadiario.com.ar/us/argentina/transsexual-palestinian-immigrant-leads-lgbt-terrorist-group-utah-usa

Video Transcript AI Summary
These students who were regular medical students, they came and spoke and basically what they were saying was they were wearing their white coats, know, they looked like medical students. They were like, we're the reason that America's calling you terrorists. And they were saying, well, if we're terrorists, we're proud to be terrorists because we're sending doctors around the world. And if that's our terror, then so be it. Yep. Right? But here's this little island, a couple of miles away from America, you know, 90 miles away from America, and they have an a president who talks like us. They have a president who understands the need for a liberated Palestine. And I think that was, that definitely altered my world.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: These students who were regular medical students, they came and spoke and basically what they were saying was they were wearing their white coats, know, they looked like medical students. They were like, we're the reason that America's calling you terrorists. And they were saying, well, if we're terrorists, we're proud to be terrorists because we're sending doctors around the world. And if that's our terror, then so be it. Yep. Right? But here's this little island, a couple of miles away from America, you know, 90 miles away from America, and they have an a president who talks like us. They have a president who understands the need for a liberated Palestine. And I think that was, that definitely altered my world.
Armed Queers group trains radical Marxists to shoot just miles from where Charlie Kirk was murdered The group trains gay, queer, and transgender people to arm themselves and fight against capitalism and the American system. There is at this time no evidence linking the group to Tyler Robinson, Kirk's accused assassin. justthenews.com
A transgender Palestinian immigrant leads an LGBT terrorist group in Utah, USA. A Palestinian and transgender immigrant, Ermiya Fanaeian, leads a far-left terrorist movement and LGBT in the United States, Utah, the state where right-wing... derechadiario.com.ar

@MJTruthUltra - MJTruthUltra

This is absolutely incredible… Tucker Carlson, while being interviewed by JD Vance, said he found it absolutely Disgusting that Netanyahu used Charlie Kirk’s death as a Talking point that he lived for Israel’s Cause “I don’t think it’s helpful for people to jump in, https://t.co/McUzsSDOjJ

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 says Charlie bridged foreign policy gaps due to "genuine affection for Israel," and he privately expressed that he "love Israel." He argued, "we should not have another forever war, regime change war against Iran," and that view made him approachable because "this person doesn't hate me. It doesn't need to get existential. It's not about disliking me or some weird bigotry." He urged continuing in "the spirit that he operated in, which is one of love for other people, including people we disagree with." Speaker 1 notes Charlie was "a hardliner on immigration" who "wanted us to control our borders as much as possible" and who "wanted us to ramp up the deportations." He recalls Charlie asking, "why aren't the deportations higher? Why aren't you doing more?" He adds, "I'm a free citizen. I love you guys. I supported you guys, and I'm going to use my platform to try to accomplish as much good as I possibly can." He concludes, "I think that made him such an effective operator."
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I think the reason that Charlie was able to bridge the gap, particularly in foreign policy, is because he had, for example, genuine affection for Israel. She expressed to me in private many, many times, like, love Israel. I don't think we should have another forever war, regime change war against Iran. And I think that made complete sense to me. I sort of agree with that, actually. And so it allowed both sides to talk to him because they felt like this person doesn't hate me. It doesn't need to get existential. It's not about disliking me or some weird bigotry. But I don't think it's helpful to for people to jump in, particularly foreign heads of state to say, this is what, you know, he lived for my cause or whatever. That's disgusting, actually. Don't do that. That turns everybody off. You don't help your own cause by doing that, and it's also literally untrue. So I just hope that we can continue in I'm not exaggerating. The spirit that he operated in, which is one of love for other people, including people we disagree with, and don't make it, you know, as small bore as that. That doesn't help. Speaker 1: Yeah. So one of the issues, Tucker, I agree with you, that that he would express disagreements with the administration on. There are two that that jump out is, one, you know, Charlie was a hardliner on immigration. He wanted us to control our borders as much as possible. He wanted us to ramp up the deportations. I remember having conversations with Charlie where he would say, why aren't the deportations higher? Why aren't you doing more? And I would talk to him. But it wasn't, hey. I don't understand this or I disagree with you, and therefore, I'm gonna blast you and assume that you're in bad faith. It's I'm a free citizen. I love you guys. I supported you guys, and I'm going to use my platform to try to accomplish as much good as I possibly can. I think that made him such an effective operator. And I would talk to Charlie. I'd say, Charlie, well, look. Here here are the reasons why. And and as you see
JesseBWatters
Posted - September 17, 2025 at 1:00 AM
Saved - September 17, 2025 at 4:55 AM

@JesseBWatters - Jesse Watters

🚨 BREAKING: Charlie Kirk’s ASSASSIN was just spotted wearing a “SUICIDE WATCH SMOCK” 🚨 We just got our hands on a TROVE of NEW EVIDENCE: TEXT MESSAGES between the SHOOTER and his TRANS BOYFRIEND A SECRET NOTE… that was DESTROYED AND A CONFESSION 🚨 https://t.co/RigA4T6GXA

Video Transcript AI Summary
Fox News Alert: evidence in the Charlie Kirk murder—text messages between the shooter and his trans boyfriend, a note, and a confession. Tyler Robinson appeared on Zoom in a suicide‑watch smock. He’s charged with seven counts, including aggravated murder, obstruction of justice, and witness tampering, with the death penalty sought. Prosecutors say this was a political hit, with aggravating factors that he targeted Kirk based on political expression and knew children were present. Police recovered a note under his keyboard: "I had the opportunity to take out Charlie Kirk, and I’m gonna take it." The shooter told his boyfriend to destroy the note; Robinson confessed: "I had enough of his hatred." FBI says there may be coconspirators and is investigating leftist groups in Utah. Robinson reportedly radicalized after moving in with his trans boyfriend. Charlie Kirk was a dad and a husband; "There is nothing more American than that."
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Fox News Alert. We just got our hands on a trove of new evidence in the Charlie Kirk murder. Text messages between the shooter and his trans boyfriend, the secret note that was destroyed, and a confession. Tyler Robinson making his first court appearance just moments ago on Zoom and wearing a suicide watch smock. Speaker 1: Notice conviction of this offense may carry the death penalty for pursuant to Utah code seventy six three dash two zero seven point seven, a mandatory mandatory term of imprisonment for life without parole or an indeterminate term of not less than twenty five years and that may be for life. Speaker 0: Earlier today, the Utah County Attorney's Office announced they were charging an emotionless Robinson with seven counts, including aggravated murder, obstruction of justice, witness tampering, and they're seeking the death penalty. Death by firing squad is on the table. Prosecutors say this was a political hit. Speaker 2: The state is further alleging aggravating factors on counts one and two because the defendant is believed believed to have targeted Charlie Kirk based on Charlie Kirk's political expression and did so knowing that children were present and would witness the homicide. Speaker 0: Officials say they interviewed Robinson's trans lover and got their hands on a secret note that the shooter left under his keyboard the morning of the assassination and text messages between the two when Robinson was on the run. Robinson texting his trans boyfriend saying, drop what you're doing. Look under my keyboard. Underneath was a note that said, I had the opportunity to take out Charlie Kirk, and I'm gonna take it. The shooter told his boyfriend to destroy the note, but police were able to recover it. Then Robinson confessed. Speaker 3: You Speaker 2: weren't the one who did it. Right? Robinson, I am. I am. I'm sorry. Roommate, I thought they caught the person. Robinson, no. They grabbed some crazy old dude. Roommate, why? Robinson, why did I do it? Roommate, yeah. Robinson, I had enough of his hatred. Some hate can't be negotiated out. How long have you been planning this? Robinson, a bit over a week. Speaker 0: That's motive and intent. Robinson texted his trans roomie saying, I'd hoped to keep this secret until I died of old age. I am sorry to involve you. Charlie's killer thought he was gonna just go home and no one would find him. He wasn't that worried about getting caught. He was more worried about his father noticing his grandpa's gun was missing. Speaker 2: I might have to abandon it and hope they don't find Prince. How the f will I explain losing it to my old man? Remember how I was engraving bullets? The f in messages are mostly a big meme. If I see notice bulge u w u on Fox New, I might have a stroke alright. I'm gonna have to leave it. That really effing sucks. Speaker 0: So what else did the roommate know, and when did he know it? And who else knew what? The FBI says Robinson may have had coconspirators. Speaker 3: Who else may have been on that thread? What they may have known? Is that fair to say? Speaker 4: It's a lot more than that. We're running them all down. Speaker 3: It's a lot more than 20? Yes, sir. Speaker 0: Cash says they're following every lead, and the FBI is currently investigating leftist groups in Utah to see if there's a conspiracy. In the last year, Robinson became radicalized after moving in with his trans boyfriend. Speaker 2: Robinson's mother explained that over the last year or so, Robinson had become more political and had started to lean more to the left, becoming more pro gay and trans rights oriented. She stated that Robinson began to date his roommate, a biological male who was transitioning genders. This resulted in several discussions with family members, but especially between Robinson and his father who have very different political views. Speaker 0: Now the media has been telling us Robinson's conservative just because his parents were Republican. You don't always have your parents' politics. Look at me. Even though his family, his friends, his text messages pin him as a progressive, and the anti fascist catchphrases on his shell casings and his trans boyfriend. But Jasmine Crockett is still in denial. The reality is that the average person on Speaker 5: the left probably couldn't make a shot from 200 yards because they haven't been playing with assault rifles since they were a little kid. Speaker 0: He couldn't be liberal because liberals are bad shots. That's what they're telling you. Now if Crockett would read, she'd know Robinson accused Charlie of hate speech and killed him for it. And we got angry when we read the messages. ABC called them romantic. Speaker 6: It was very touching in a way that I think many of us didn't expect. A very intimate portrait into this relationship between the suspect's roommate and the suspect himself with him repeatedly calling his roommate who is transitioning, calling him my love, and I wanna protect you, my love. Speaker 0: ABC's touched by text messages between an assassin and his trans roommate. Disney is tickled by the intimacy of a killer telling his trans roommate how to orchestrate a cover up. This isn't a love story. This is a cold blooded murderer obstructing justice. ABC wasn't this touched when Charlie's widow wept in front of the nation. And the far left is acting like Charlie had it coming. Speaker 7: If you wanted Charlie Kirk to be alive, Donald Trump shouldn't have been president for the second term. You need conservatives to be afraid of getting killed when they go to events so that they look to their leadership to turn down the temperature. The issue is right now, they don't feel like there's any fear. Speaker 0: That guy's name's Destiny, and he just learned his fate. He's fired and banned from making any more money on his site. You need conservatives to be afraid of getting killed when you go to events? CNN is defending this guy. Speaker 8: We can't punish people for disagreeing with us. We can't punish people for being jerks and celebrating the death of someone. That's not illegal, and that shouldn't be who we are. Speaker 0: She's right. It's not illegal to say Charlie deserved to die, and they're glad he did. They have a right to say that, but we have a right to fire you. You can't walk into the office and say you're into homicide. You can't work at CNN and tweet, I'm comfortable with cold blooded murder. More people need to be killed. Speech is free, but you're not free from the consequences. If you're glad Charlie's dead and thought he had it coming, I'm supposed to sit next to you in the break room? You're gonna teach my kid at school or serve in government? And I'm supposed to just say, free speech. You're advertising that you're a maniac and that you have no decency, compassion, or humanity. That you're indifferent to death. And not just indifferent, you're sickly gleeful. That makes you a threat. That makes you dangerous. It makes you a beast. And what do we do with beasts? We leave them out in the wild. We have to be very careful about the kind of people we associate with. They aren't entitled to work for us. And these people, sadly, are everywhere. Speaker 9: Charlie Cook committed suicide is what he did. He knew it was coming. Charlie Cook did a great thing for humanity. He stopped that bullet before he hit a human being. Speaker 3: That bullet connected with Trump. How would you have felt if it had connected with more than I Speaker 9: wish that shooter would have been in Butner, Pennsylvania instead of getting Charlie Kirk. Speaker 0: This is more than just a disagreement over the border or crime or politics. We're talking about murder. Would CNN be okay if their producer said, that girl that got raped, she had it coming. Of course not. Or the Ukrainian refugee stabbed to death on a train, Irina, deserved to die. Those floods in Texas, that's karma. Hope you can swim. Never. And we're not saying these people should be put in prison. We're saying they're not walking into my office. I'm not letting them hang around my family. I don't wanna be anywhere near them. This college student in Texas barged into a Charlie Kirk vigil and acted out the bullying ripping through his throat. Texas State University just expelled that clown. It's a state school, and taxpayers should never have to fund that ghoul's education. He's a sociopath. And if he didn't learn his lesson today, in a few years, I guarantee he'll be preying on some innocent victim or victims. So we're not advocating jail time. We're recommending social purgatory until he repents and means it. Society's already treating the cancer. A councilman in Florida got caught celebrating Charlie's death, and now he's facing the will of the people. Speaker 10: Your days are numbered. You're rolling your eyes. It's disgraceful, man. You have brought a horrible name to this community. Speaker 5: I have a recall petition. If you're really gonna make the whole village go through this, it's gonna be done. I we have 40% of this village that's gonna do it. Walk away with respect. Do what's right. Speaker 0: I hope you find God, and your final judgment day is better than today. A country that supports assassinations is a country hurtling towards civil war. It's the very thirst for assassination and the fact that it's tolerated that's leading to more attempts. Charlie wasn't president. He wasn't a member of an extremist group. He was a mainstream Republican. He was on Fox. He had a hit podcast. He was my friend. They killed my friend. But above all, Charlie was a dad. He was a husband. Here he is telling his daughter how he met his mom. Speaker 4: Story time. So we're here at Bill's Harter's in New York City. And right near this very table is the first time that dad had met mama. And it started as a job, I was asking all these questions asking all these questions, philosophy, religion, Jesus. And then I realized mama was beautiful and smart and elegant and Christ like. And so I said, forget this job interview. I want to date you. I said, I have enough friends. And that's where your journey started. Speaker 0: Charlie wanted more than anything for Americans to fall in love and get married and have families, and draw themselves closer to God. There's nothing more American than that. There's nothing more human than that. Anyone who defiles a human life or advocates innocent lives to end violently is an animal.
Meowllian
Posted - September 20, 2025 at 4:49 AM
Saved - September 30, 2025 at 2:42 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
In my recent posts, I discussed the connections between various security figures and organizations linked to TPUSA, particularly focusing on Greg Shaffer of Shaffer Security Group and his ties to Echelon Front and JINSA. I highlighted the involvement of key individuals like Dan Flood and Brian Babin, emphasizing their roles in security and political circles. Additionally, I raised concerns about the effectiveness of Kirk's security detail during a recent incident, questioning their actions and the implications of their connections. The discussion also touched on historical ties between the LDS community and intelligence agencies.

@Meowllian - 𝕄𝕖𝕠𝕨𝕝𝕝𝕚𝕠𝕟

🔻🔻TPUSA Security 🔻🔻 Dan Flood - Head of Security Shaffer Security Group Echelon Front ▪️Greg Shaffer — founder Shaffer Security Group, FBI 20 years, used to do security for TPUSA until 2022. However, this same Shaffer security can be seen at UVU. Greg posts frequently about Islamic terror threats and pro Israel propaganda. ▪️Ben Shaffer — Greg Shaffer’s brother. Ben is to the right of Trump in the famous July 13 Butler photo. In the video below, Ben is the man in the middle sitting next to Erik Prince (Blackwater) speaking on working private security. ▪️Leif Babin — co-founder of Echelon Front, along with John Willink (Jocko Media), David Berke, Leif Babin, Codey Gandy, Steve Ward. Greg Shaffer, Willink, Babin & David Flood (Head of Security TPUSA) can be seen below in front of Echelon Front logo. Leif Babin is closely connected to JINSA (Jewish Institute of National Security of America) NY Cabinet, a powerful think tank on US Israel Defense Policy. ▪️Brian Babin (Congressman TX 36) — Leif Babin’s father is Chairman of the House Science, Space and Technology Committee and member of the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure. —> On Sept 10th, Babin attended the US Chamber of Commerce’s Global Aerospace Summit (Sept 9 - 11) —> Babin is very close to Trump & heavily involved with all Congressional Bills pushing Israel Defense funding - OBBB AI Technocratic Surveillance - Aeronautics- OBBB - Weather Authorization Act 2025, Border Policy / Alligator Alcatraz —> Brian Babin seen in pic below celebrating the passing of the OBBB standing in front of a painting in the White House depicting events transpired at Butler. Ben Shaffer is the Black shirt guy in CKs security detail (to the right of CK) was also at Butler (seen in sunglasses to the right of Trump).

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker details a security career with frontline work in Iraq and Afghanistan. They’ve provided security services to the president of the United States and other high-ranking members of the U.S. government, and they’ve protected diplomatic personnel, high-net-worth corporate clients, media personalities, investigative journalists, and the general public. They continue this work as a SWAT team leader and executive protection specialist, and have been repeatedly recognized for high-level professionalism, proficiency, and knowledge of security measures across those fields. The narration signals ongoing analysis of past events, suggesting the speaker is evaluating what happened within this security context in complex environments.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Performance in both Iraq and Afghanistan. I've provided security services to the president of The United States and other high ranking members in the United States government. I've protected diplomatic persons, high net worth corporate clients, media personalities, investigative journalists, and the general public. I continue that work today as a SWAT team leader and executive protection specialist. I've been recognized on numerous occasions for my high level professionalism, proficiency, and knowledge of all security measures while working in those fields. As I analyze what happened and

@Meowllian - 𝕄𝕖𝕠𝕨𝕝𝕝𝕚𝕠𝕟

SHAFFER SECURITY GROUP — TPUSA Security Firm ▪️Greg Shaffer - CEO - FBI 20 years ECHELON FRONT ▪️Leif Babin - co-founder - US Navy Seals —> closely connected to JINSA NY Cabinet JINSA — Jewish Institute for National Security of America ▪️policy think tank focused on US - Israel Defense & National Security issues in the Middle East. ▪️Michael Makovsky PhD - CEO —> worked extensively on US Israel defense ties & US policy towards Syria, Iraq, Gaza, and Middle East. —> Former Foreign Policy Director for Bipartisan Policy Center —> Former Special Assistant in Office of Secretary of Defense —> close to Yahoo

@deepwebslinger - DeepWebSlinger

How about a little background on Charlie Kirk's security company and who they're really associated with. ✡️

@Meowllian - 𝕄𝕖𝕠𝕨𝕝𝕝𝕚𝕠𝕟

https://t.co/a4b378i1Fn

@Meowllian - 𝕄𝕖𝕠𝕨𝕝𝕝𝕚𝕠𝕟

Shaffer JINSA Echelon Front

@Meowllian - 𝕄𝕖𝕠𝕨𝕝𝕝𝕚𝕠𝕟

https://t.co/54bEz4T1W2

@Meowllian - 𝕄𝕖𝕠𝕨𝕝𝕝𝕚𝕠𝕟

The history of the LDS + Deep State LDS recruits are overwhelmingly represented in multiple intelligence agencies, FBI, NSA, CIA, DHS, DoD, etc, and this is documented throughout history. Allan Dulles (FBI) preferred LDS recruits, 🔲 Early LDS missionaries were funded by the Rothschilds and had very militant operations since their first settlements in 1849 Utah. LDS lobbied Congress for the establishment of the State of the Deseret which would have included parts of California & the lands gained in the Mexican Succession. While this plan failed, the State of the Deseret is still referenced today thru beehive insignia embodying in the ideal of Zion, a community of righteousness, peace, and unity. 🔲 FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover is said to have preferred LDS recruits into the FBI, as was confirmed by Peter Ahearn, a former FBI special agent in charge who oversaw the agency’s recruiting for nearly three decades. 🔲 The nexus between Mossad and Mormon secret agents was published by Norman Mailer in A Harlot High and Low in the 60's when a reconditioned WWII Liberty ship was hijacked on the Thames River in London by Mossad. The ship had a cargo of uranium ore that had been originally mined in southern Utah that involved the Utah Corporation which also mines in Australia as well as Chile. 🔲 The establishment of Brigham Young University’s branch in Israel created a legitimate front for covert activities of the secret/CIA element of the LDS. Mormon world political interests are promoted and pursued lobbying on behalf of the Israeli government to pursue their Mosaic Law of an eye for an eye philosophy against Arab states and the deprived Palestinian people.

@Meowllian - 𝕄𝕖𝕠𝕨𝕝𝕝𝕚𝕠𝕟

@Use_Yandex_ BY + Rothschilds + LDS + Deep State

@Meowllian - 𝕄𝕖𝕠𝕨𝕝𝕝𝕚𝕠𝕟

https://t.co/YT69OoBk1v

@Meowllian - 𝕄𝕖𝕠𝕨𝕝𝕝𝕚𝕠𝕟

Brian Babin (TX 36) - Congressman with President Trump on 9/6/25 https://t.co/AtXOQHQq4v

@Meowllian - 𝕄𝕖𝕠𝕨𝕝𝕝𝕚𝕠𝕟

https://t.co/gUqlaa3sFt

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

Let me get this straight... Here we have Greg Shaffer, ex FBI and owner of Shaffer Security Group(the company that employed Dan Flood; the guy that's always behind Charlie) immediately going on multiple news stations to discuss the shooting and advise people as to what the FBI is doing... Nothing odd about that at all.. What's the liability for a security company that does nothing beyond standing there and allows the person they're protecting to be assassinated? Nothing? He claims he stopped working with Kirk in 2022. (no proof of that and you can clearly see Dan Flood right behind him) Greg claims it would have been "near impossible" to put a few men on the only roofs in the area.. "too expensive"...wow..🧵

Video Transcript AI Summary
Greg Schaefer, former FBI agent and CEO of Schaefer Security Group, said investigators are at the scene collecting evidence, including cell phones, videos and photographs from everyone present, and are scouring footage to identify a vehicle or the shooter as they left. He notes the weapon may have been left on the rooftop and that there may be DNA residue, fingerprints or shell casings, with a full court press by the FBI, Homeland Security, and local and state police to identify the shooter. John Anarelli says witnesses with video want to solve the case and that the FBI has a contact number to upload video; surveillance cameras and vehicles will be reviewed. The event drew about 3,000 people; Charlie Kirk had security, but security was not the same as protecting the site, and countersniper capabilities are extremely difficult. Charlie Kirk is a civilian; ballistic glass costs were discussed.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Thank you. Speaker 1: Well, listen now to talk more about the shooting and the hunt for the the assassin, former FBI agent, former member of the FBI hostage rescue team, Greg Schaefer, who's also CEO of the Schaefer Security Group. Speaker 0: And we're also joined by former FBI special agent, John Anarelli. Great to see both of you this morning. Greg, I'll start with you. Right now, the police and the FBI, they don't have anybody in custody that we know of. Two people were brought in for questioning yesterday, but then they were released. So where does the FBI's investigation turn to now? Speaker 2: Well, they're, at the location, the exact location of where the shot was fired, and they're trying to collect evidence, at that at that scene. They're collecting the cell phone, videos and photographs from everybody that was there on-site, and they're scouring through those videos to see if they can identify a vehicle or the shooter as he left the scene. You know, again, the rooftop may have the weapon may have been left there, may have been left behind. We don't know that. The FBI is keeping that information very close to the chest. Mhmm. There may be DNA residue up there left on the rooftop or fingerprints or shell casing with a fingerprint. So, again, there there are things that the FBI is doing, you know, behind the curtains of so to speak, that they're not letting us know right now how far along the investigation they are. But they there's it's a full court press by the FBI, homeland security, and local police, state police, to identify who the shooter is. Speaker 0: Yeah. Speaker 1: Yeah. John, Greg mentioned it two times yesterday. Police indicated or at least on social media, we were led to believe they had the guy in custody. Turned out not to be true. Do you worry that both of those in custody moments allowed the thousands of people there and their cell phones to get away, to leave the area? All that evidence, all of those people who could have pointed somewhere are now scattered to the winds, and investigators have to go find them? Speaker 3: I don't think they're gonna have to look very hard because people who were there who took video wanna solve this case. The FBI has made available a contact number that people can call if they have information. They can upload video that they have to assist in this investigation. Likewise, the FBI and locals are gonna be looking at every surveillance camera in the area, looking at vehicles that traverse from that location. So there's a lot of work being done, as Greg said, behind the scenes, and they're going to solve this case. Speaker 0: Yeah, and we hope that they solve it soon because right now there's a political assassin roaming free out there. And Greg, about 3,000 people. We understand we're at this event. The school's police department had six officers working it. We know that Charlie Kirk also had some personal security right there up front. But after something like this happens, a shooting in a gun free zone such as a college campus, I have to think that this changes things in the future. Do you think there was something more that could have been done to stop this? Speaker 2: Well, I don't know if you know this, but my company, Shift Security Group, actually was the head of security, and we did all these events for Charlie Kirk and Turning Point USA from 2015 to 2022. So I've actually been on college campuses, the exact, scenario that he was, doing when he was shot and killed. So, you know, he had, probably five, maybe six personal security, officers in and around the inner security where he was right around the stage. You look at the videos, you see two very large men in front of of the stage. You see an individual to directly to his right over his shoulder, and they probably had two individuals behind the stage, behind the tent as well. A couple of that with the six police officers on-site, and the six police officers were probably just doing crowd control and doing traffic control. So you gotta remember that the personal security for Charlie Kirk, their mission, the reason for them being there is to protect Charlie Kirk, full stop. They do not do anything as in regards to securing the site itself. That being said, securing a threat from 200 yards away or more. We're not sure exactly how far that distance is yet. It's very difficult, if not impossible. The is is manpower intense. If you have manpower issues, y'all all feel obviously have money issues. So to have a countersniper team or have the capabilities to identify and designate a threat that's 200 yards away is extremely difficult. Speaker 1: Yeah. John, to Greg's point, I mean, this is not a political candidate. This is not the president of The United States. They don't come with a massive plane loads full of secret service. Yeah. Charlie was a civilian, and we're talking about his security as if he was, you know, a sitting office holder. These are much different things, and this stuff costs a lot of money, doesn't it? Speaker 3: Not only costs a lot of money when you look at the resources involved in getting law enforcement to handle a private event, you still have to police the community. There are limited resources available. But in this day and age, having an outdoor event where you are a political target needing to be aware of the distance, the sight lines. But for Pennsylvania was only a year ago, so the reality that those situation exists, we have to plan for them in the future. It was tragic what occurred yesterday. Speaker 1: Yeah. We often ask, like, why wasn't there ballistic glass in front of him? That cost a lot of money. Alright. Greg, John, thank you for joining us this morning and giving us your insights. Speaker 0: Thank you, guys. Speaker 3: Thank you.

@Meowllian - 𝕄𝕖𝕠𝕨𝕝𝕝𝕚𝕠𝕟

Dan Flood — Head of TPUSA Security

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

🧵Dan Flood https://t.co/gIYHAtqOqW

@Meowllian - 𝕄𝕖𝕠𝕨𝕝𝕝𝕚𝕠𝕟

https://t.co/jxeSG9HsRo

@VoxExVeritas - VΩX

👀Charlie Kirk's “Security” and Their Ties to Israel (I'm adding “NOT SUICIDAL” to my bio) Charlie Kirk's private security was handled by a detail that sometimes included former Secret Service agents and U.S. Marines. The security team, contracted by his organization Turning Point USA, was led by former FBI agent Greg Shaffer. The internet (and possibly Shaffer himself) is now distancing him from Kirk’s security. If you search for a connection, it will tell you that Shaffer Security Group stopped working with Kirk in 2022. Despite the supposed security expertise, this is Shaffer's comment about the Kirk shooting: “We typically anticipated close-range threats...” There is no proof of any disconnection. A single AP article making that claim yesterday is the only source. You can clearly see that Charlie had the same security personnel in 2022 that he did at the shooting. The people in charge of Kirk’s security essentially did nothing to secure the area or inspect rooftops prior to or during the event, despite the fact that it would have been a simple four-man job that could have included cameras for the event. After the shooting, the crime scene was not secured, and they allowed the staff to simply pack up the area. 🧵 @HarrisonHSmith @IanCarrollShow

@Meowllian - 𝕄𝕖𝕠𝕨𝕝𝕝𝕚𝕠𝕟

Dr Frank Turek

@LaylaSofia2002 - Layla

@RyanMattaMedia Charlie Kirk's kill team members Dan Glenn, Justin Miraz and @DrFrankTurek . https://t.co/BtyXzyMSRt

@Meowllian - 𝕄𝕖𝕠𝕨𝕝𝕝𝕚𝕠𝕟

https://t.co/zLFp07YuZy

@Meowllian - 𝕄𝕖𝕠𝕨𝕝𝕝𝕚𝕠𝕟

Do we have another security firm involved? YREFY sponsored TPUSA Laine Shoneberger - CIO & Managing Partner of Yrefy https://t.co/2Qc3sMV0sO

@SkepticNut - Skeptic Nut

This is not UVU Police or Charlie's security. This was a TPUSA sponsor rep from Yrefy. Looks a lot like Laine Shoneberger, Chief Investment Officer and Managing Partner but difficult to know for sure. Photo below is from his FB where he is dressed in company attire, pictured with Larry Elder, Brandon Tatum and Chad Jackson for the film premiere of Uncle Tom in August 2022. I know you are inundated with DM's but I did send you a video on this yesterday.

Video Transcript AI Summary
A viewer notes a person in a blue shirt visible amid the chaos who sends a text and then takes a photo, and they wonder who that is. The speaker mentions receiving a ton of messages from current Turning Point employees about the company. The person is wearing a shirt that says Wirefi. According to sources at Turning Point, it was a rather young company that hasn't been around for very long, that came out in a really big way in terms of sponsorship for this tour. This aligns with Wi Fi being the backdrop advertiser behind Charlie in the event clips, suggesting the person may have attended as their first event of the season, as major sponsors. Judging by the placement and the fact that a wirefi donor or employee is there, we can draw the conclusion that they sponsored this very event. And I'm interested in knowing who that is.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: That's he's he's right there in the blue shirt. And, like, he I I don't I sends a text. As as I'm watching the footage, it goes on a little bit longer. Like, sends a text, takes a photo. Not entirely clear what's being done there, but it just sort of stood out to me, like, in the middle of the chaos seeing that. And I would really like to know who that is because we had received a ton of messages from current employees at Turning Point that had mentioned that company. He's wearing a shirt that says Wirefi. And according to the sources at Turning Point, it it was a rather young company, meaning that the company hasn't been around for very long, that came out in a really big way in terms of sponsorship, for this tour. And that's common sense given the fact that Wi Fi, you will notice in the clips of the event, is the backdrop advertiser that's behind Charlie. So maybe this person came because it's his first event of the season, and they are the major sponsors. Like I said, judging by the placement and the fact that a wirefi donor or employee is there, we can draw the conclusion that they sponsored this very event. And, I'm interested in knowing who that is.

@Meowllian - 𝕄𝕖𝕠𝕨𝕝𝕝𝕚𝕠𝕟

Yrefy — multiple entities in several states set up as shell companies Laine Shoneberger

@Meowllian - 𝕄𝕖𝕠𝕨𝕝𝕝𝕚𝕠𝕟

Yrefy — Donald & Laine Shoneberger

@Meowllian - 𝕄𝕖𝕠𝕨𝕝𝕝𝕚𝕠𝕟

Terryl Fansworth + Bryan Farnsworth — SD Card boys from AZ https://t.co/l5rjIuRfnt

@cecespitbull - Pitbull

@DiligentDenizen The man's name is Terryl Farnsworth. He and his brother Bryan Farnsworth handled Charlie's Video/Recording. They are from AZ. Huge Kirk fans. Too stupid to know to secure the scene. Plus no law enforcement did either. UVU law enforcement suck.

@Meowllian - 𝕄𝕖𝕠𝕨𝕝𝕝𝕚𝕠𝕟

@DebiLuvzGold

@Meowllian - 𝕄𝕖𝕠𝕨𝕝𝕝𝕚𝕠𝕟

@VoxExVeritas Pretty sure it’s him. I saw another source confirming it. Looking for it. He is the head of security for TPUSA still til this day.

@Meowllian - 𝕄𝕖𝕠𝕨𝕝𝕝𝕚𝕠𝕟

@ZoomonZuma 🔥 🔥 🔥

@Meowllian - 𝕄𝕖𝕠𝕨𝕝𝕝𝕚𝕠𝕟

@HeathrowJames What the hell does this have to do with why I posted?! Looks like you’re the bot and you’re directive is malfunctioning

TheIntelSCIF
Posted - September 30, 2025 at 7:21 PM
Saved - October 1, 2025 at 6:37 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m exploring the connections between Utah Valley University and the assassination of Charlie Kirk. It's curious that TPUSA rented the State Farm Stadium for Charlie's memorial in May 2025 when no other events were scheduled. There were military aircraft nearby during the assassination, and I'll discuss drones in a future video. Additionally, CIA agents were reportedly on campus, and their accounts were scrubbed after being exposed. When Tucker Carlson spoke at the event, Charlie encouraged him to speak freely about all topics, including sensitive ones. This situation is more complex than it appears.

@TheIntelSCIF - The SCIF

INTELLIGENCE ties to Utah Valley University and the Charlie Kirk assassination. Why was the State Farm Stadium center for Charlie's memorial service rented out by TPUSA in May of 2025, when no other events were planned or on their schedule? Why was their military/intelligence related aircraft flying in the proximity during the Charlie Kirk assassination. We will get into the drones in an upcoming video. Why are there CIA agents embedded at the Utah Valley University campus and why were their accounts scrubbed after this was made public? Last but not least, when Charlie invited Tucker to speak, Tucker told Charlie he would not bring up other countries such as Israel so he doesn't upset Charlie's donors. Charlie told him to specifically NOT HOLD BACK and to speak the truth about EVERYTHING and not to worry about his donors, so Tucker did. This is so much deeper than you are being led to believe. Pay attention. cc: TPVsean

Video Transcript AI Summary
TPUSA rented the State Farm Stadium for September 21, with the speaker saying there was no other planned event on that date. Investigators assert that a seemingly ordinary Utah Valley University professor was actually a CIA asset, one of seven intelligence and security specialists (Rusty Needs). The speaker questions why the UVU directory lists were removed and notes a claim that removing the directory was to protect faculty and staff; profiles including Elena Vasquez, Mark Harlan, Sarah Klein, Jamal Reed, T. Ramirez, and Elle Patel were reportedly dropped. It is claimed that UVU president Tuminez quietly cut ties to Zions Bank and Carnegie. Separately, Aircraft N1098L, a Bombardier Global 6,500, loitered near Charlie Kirk’s assassination; a Meta-recording button was described. The Lavon affair is recounted, ending with "Go all the way. Do it."
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: TPUSA rented that State Farm Stadium for the September 21 in May and it oh you might think oh well they have some other event that going on. No. You go on their website. There was no other planned event that was on the schedule for the September 21. Speaker 1: Investigators found that a seemingly ordinary professor was actually a CIA asset, one of seven intelligence and security specialists. Speaker 2: Was a CIA professor at Utah Valley University, Rusty Needs. He he was with the CNSS. I saw his bio, his photo. Just a few days ago, like, two days ago, I took this picture from the website. I got his bio, everything, and he has now, like, disappeared. I can't find it anywhere online. If anyone can find it, please let me know. I did have this, which is still on the Facebook page. Anyway, where is Rusty Needs? Hashtag where is Rusty Needs, the CIA agent that works at Utah Valley University. Why has he gone ghost online? Okay. I did this video yesterday, and now AI is saying that these people don't exist. The six people that I named don't exist, and it's all fiction. Does anybody know if any of these people are real people at Utah Valley University? Okay. Speaker 3: So I used AI to search the way back machine, and here are the dates and removals. So his profile was fully accessible on 09/24/2025, but taken down between September 24 and September 20 He looks to be the first taken down, followed by six others, also in the CNSS spy school or tied to Canvas security. These include doctor Elena Vasquez, national security policy whiz, professor Mark Harlan, counterintelligence ethics expert, Sarah Klein, event logistics liaison. Jamal Reed, track coach with security ties. T. Ramirez, intelligence simulations analyst. And Elle Patel, event planning coordinator. Now get this. Yesterday, I got a message from at humanities girly on TikTok saying, hey. So they removed the entire UVU directory from the Internet to protect faculty and staff. It's not just him. It's everyone. And then instantly, she went ghost. Her profile said, not found. So now everyone's profile is down. CNSS Rusty's department definitely contributed to Kirk event planning via briefings, but Utah Valley Police ran the security. Also interesting is that at the same time that those seven profiles were dropped from the website, president Tuminez quietly removed her significant ties to Zions Bank and Carnegie. Speaker 1: Now there's even more confirmation. Aircraft N1098L, a Bombardier Global 6,500, with a call sign Axle 10 loitered within visible range of Charlie Kirk's assassination as it happened. The Global 6,500 isn't a commuter jet. It's a platform for military intelligence, surveillance, and even weaponized drone operations. As Kirk lay bleeding, the scene closed in around him, appearing to render aid. But then, right in the middle of the chaos, he makes a decision, calm controlled. His hand rises to his Meta glasses and taps the record button. Speaker 4: Commenting about the sunglasses that the security guy that has the half sleeve, that he was they basically said, hey. He's wearing the Meta Ray Bans. And he actually went to record or take a picture of basically right over Charlie's body. So I looked at it and I was like, cow. They're a 100% correct. He does. He goes down and I'll impose the video right here. Take a look. He is going on the right hand side and he is touching this button. And what this button does, there's only one button. You hit it once. Real quick, that is a picture. It takes a picture of whatever you're looking at. Okay? If you hold it down just a little bit longer, it is going to record. Speaker 5: Part of history, you were never taught. The Lavon affair was a false flag operation carried out by Israel in Egypt in 1954. Israel was concerned about the rise of Egyptian nationalism under president Gamal Abdel Nasser and feared the strengthening ties between Egypt western powers, especially The US. So Israel came up with a plan. The operation was codenamed Operation Susannah or as it is commonly referred to now, Lavanafer. Israeli military intelligence recruited Egyptian Jews and undercover Israeli agents to orchestrate a series of bombings targeting American and British owned institutions in Egypt. The goal was to blame the attacks on the Muslim Brotherhood, Egyptian communists, or local nationalists, and damage relations between Egypt and the Western powers, particularly The US and The UK. During the month of July 1954, the operatives carried out a series of bombings targeting American and British owned civilian facilities in Cairo and Alexandria. The targets included cinemas, libraries, American educational centers, post offices on July 2. The agents detonated bombs at a post office in Alexandria. On July 14, they bombed the libraries of the US information agency in Alexandria and Cairo in a British owned theater. The homemade bombs consisting of bags containing acid placed over nitroglycerin were inserted into books and placed on the shelves of the libraries just before closing time. Several hours later, as the acid ate through the bags, the bombs exploded. On July 23, an incendiary bomb went off in the pocket of one of the agents outside the British owned theater in Alexandria. On 10/05/1954, Egypt announced the arrest of a 13 man spy ring. Egypt concluded that the operation was ordered by the Israeli secretary of defense, Pinchas Lavan, hence the name Lavan affair. The 13 agents consisted of Egyptian Jews and undercover Israelis. Two were acquitted. One of the Israeli agents, Max Bennett, who lived himself on arrest. One unalived himself in prison. Two more were unalived, and the rest were sentenced to lengthy prison terms. The Lavan affair meant that Israel lost significant standing and credibility in its relations with The US and The UK, which took years to repair. In 02/2005, Israel publicly honored the surviving spies by presenting them each with a certificate of appreciation for their efforts on behalf of the state, ending decades of official denial by Israel that the operation ever took place. The Lavon affair serves as proof that false flag operations are not off the table when it comes to Israel. Speaker 2: But it's it seemed true to me, and I had done, some work on that. I knew a bunch of people pretty close to that story. So so I thought that. And I said that to Charlie, and I said, but I'm not gonna say that because I don't wanna make your donors mad. I know it's just gonna be like an endless flurry of texts telling you to stop or you're gonna lose a bunch of funding. And he looked at me, I'll never forget it, and said, go all the way. Do it. Go all the way. I said, man, I you know, a lot of things I can talk about. I don't need to talk about that. And he said, do it. So I did it.
HustleBitch_
Posted - September 30, 2025 at 8:48 PM
Saved - September 30, 2025 at 11:06 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I discovered potential suspects in Charlie Kirk's assassination. At 12:15:18 PM, a man resembling the FBI's shooter, Tyler Robinson, was seen near Charlie's tent, acting suspiciously with a piece of fabric and planting something on the railing. Moments later, another individual interacted with that spot. Additionally, at 12:06 PM, another man was spotted on a nearby roof, and by 12:23 PM, footage showed a "shooter" fleeing another building. This sequence suggests a coordinated effort rather than random chaos, raising questions about the number of individuals involved.

@HustleBitch_ - HustleBitch

🚨 I JUST FOUND CHARLIE KIRK'S ASSASSIN(S) 🚨 WATCH THIS VERY CLOSELY. At 12:15:18 PM outside the Sorensen Center, a man matching the FBI's shooter Tyler Robinson with black hat, maroon shirt, sunglasses, black backpack, is spotted directly overhead and in-line with Charlie's tent, possibly from where the bullet traveled. He’s holding a piece of fabric in his left hand, using it to cover his grip as he plants something on the railing. Seconds later, another figure suspiciously touches that exact spot, slips something into his pocket, then slams out three fist-bumps on the rail. THE SIGNAL. But of course, this isn’t the only sighting: • Just before this, at 12:06 PM, another man is seen on the roof of the Woodbury Building. • At 12:23 PM, the FBI’s footage shows a "shooter" running off the Losee roof. Three different buildings. Three different times. Same window of 17 minutes. This wasn’t chaos. This was choreography. So the question the FBI won’t touch: how many assassins were REALLY involved in Charlie Kirk’s death?

Video Transcript AI Summary
Look how look how tiny that is. Wow. It's my own DIY streaming setup. So it's professional ones, not like $5. Yeah. This is the mic right here. This is the receiver for this. Yeah. It's a it's half over that transmitter. Really? So that way, if I have multiple cameras, you don't miss any angle, you know. Who makes that camera? Logitech. Yeah. It's always an emphasis. It's a Levo. It's for the game. I have a big a bigger one at home that I like to bring out here. It's a pretty wide angle. It has a micro four thirds lens. Oh, it does? Yeah. It's that big. Yeah. It's like a cube, like this big.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Look how look how tiny that is. Wow. It's my own DIY streaming setup. So it's professional ones, not like $5. Yeah. I just don't remember what that is. I've seen I've seen small ones, but I haven't seen them in some. This is the mic right here. This is the receiver for this. Yeah. It's a it's half over that transmitter. Really? So that way, if I have multiple cameras, you don't miss any angle, you know. Who makes that camera? Logitech. Yeah. It's always an emphasis. It's a Levo. It's for the game. I have a big a bigger one at home that I like to bring out here. It's a pretty wide angle. It has a micro four thirds lens. Oh, it does? Yeah. It's that big. Yeah. It's like a cube, like this big.
ProjectConstitu
Posted - October 9, 2025 at 3:55 PM
Saved - October 9, 2025 at 9:32 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The mystery surrounding the UVU shooting deepens as Rusty Needs, the ex-CIA professor linked to the incident, has vanished from online presence. Tyler Robinson, identified by the FBI as a suspect, is connected to a club that may be a CIA operation targeting young individuals for blackmail. This raises questions about the CIA's involvement at UVU and why these connections are being ignored. I urge everyone to follow @TheLFLounge for more insights and to share any tips regarding the events of 9/10. The search for truth continues.

@ProjectConstitu - Project Constitution

🚨BREAKING: BREAKING: UVU Shooting Mystery Deepens – Rusty Needs Gone, Suspects Tied to Secret CIA Front Rusty Needs, the ex-CIA professor who ran the CNSS at Utah Valley University — right where Charlie Kirk was shot on 9/10/2025 — has completely vanished online. His bio and photo were on the UVU site just days ago… now gone. Here’s where it gets explosive: Tyler Robinson, the FBI-identified suspect in the Charlie Kirk shooting, is connected to a Buzzards & Bees club — and so are his gay furry lover and the two goth girls seen by Phil Lyman, who allegedly celebrated immediately after the shooting. Multiple sources suggest this club is a CIA honeypot operation, targeting young people for blackmail and surveillance. Think about it: a CIA-connected academic disappears off the grid, while the official suspect and his close circle are all tied to a possible honeypot front? The dots are stacking fast. We need answers: Where is Rusty Needs? What was the CIA’s involvement at UVU? And why are these connections being overlooked in the mainstream narrative? Please go FOLLOW @TheLFLounge who is doing a great job digging deep and uncovering a lot of this information. 💥 Comment, share, and send any tips. The truth about 9/10 isn’t going away.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker describes an ongoing investigation linking the CIA, the LDS community, Utah Valley University, and Israeli academic centers such as the Jerusalem Center and Ariel University, saying they've connected many dots and reached the end of the investigation, with nervousness and sleeplessness. He asks Kash Patel and Donald Trump to respond. He alleges there was a CIA professor at Utah Valley University named Rusty Needs, he he was with the CNSS. He says he saw his bio and photo a few days ago, took a picture from the website, but now it has disappeared online, and he can't find it anywhere. He asks for help locating Rusty Needs, Hashtag where is Rusty Needs, the CIA agent that works at Utah Valley University, and questions why he has gone ghost online. What do you guys think? Comment below.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hey, guys. So this week, I've been doing my own little off piece Charlie Kirk investigation. Many of you guys have been following along. I've connected a lot of dots between the CIA, the LDS community, the Utah Valley University system, and academic centers in Israel, like the Jerusalem Center and Ariel University. I think I've kind of, like, reached the end of my investigation, and also I'm, like, kinda getting nervous. Like, I couldn't sleep last night at all. But my main question now is, and I would like to turn it over to the authorities. Kash Patel, Donald Trump, this is kinda, like, for you to answer now. There is was a CIA professor at Utah Valley University, Rusty Needs. He he was with the CNSS. I saw his bio, his photo. Just a few days ago, like two days ago, I took this picture from the website. I got his bio, everything, and he has now, like, disappeared. I can't find it anywhere online. If anyone can find it, please let me know. I did have this, which is still on the Facebook page. Anyway, where is Rusty Needs? Hashtag where is Rusty Needs, the CIA agent that works at Utah Valley University. Why has he gone ghost online? Okay. What do you guys think? Comment below.

@ProjectConstitu - Project Constitution

🚨 EXPOSED: The Charlie Kirk Assassination Was NO Lone Wolf Hit—It's a Deep State Team Op with CIA Ties, Moss^d Links & Gov Foreknowledge! On Sept 10, 2025, Charlie Kirk was gunned down at UVU. Official story? Lone gunman Tyler James Robinson. BS. Dig deeper: Google searches for "Tyler James Robinson 'alleged Charlie Kirk shooter'" EXPLODED on Sept 9th—ONE DAY BEFORE—in Washington DC & Huntsville, AL (Redstone Arsenal/Missile Defense hub). Specific full-name spikes? That's PRE-STAGING. Not random—gov intel teams KNEW. Then: Sept 7th (TWO DAYS prior), MASSIVE spikes on Derek Maxfield—the billionaire owner of the shady private jet (N888KG, Unique Cosmetics MLM front like Amway/Betsy DeVos vibes) that BOLTED from Provo Airport JUST 20 MINS AFTER the shot. I traced it to Moss^d connections. It killed its transponder, GHOSTED for 45 mins mid-flight. Escape pod? SAME DC & Huntsville hotspots querying both Robinson and Maxfield. Huntsville's space/missile command + DC energy depts? Possible—Q-level OP. Echoes JFK: Oswald's file on Angleton's desk pre-hit. We know NOW, not in 60 yrs. @RealGeorgeWebb1 bombshell: CCTV catches a Tyler-lookalike (tall, big nose) on UVU campus MINUTES before—behind 2nd-floor glass, EXACT spot near Phil Lyman & his "two goth girls." Lyman confirmed they were right there. Webb connects: Those girls from Provo's Buzzards & Bees goth club—SAME as Candace Owens exposed Robby Hild in (goth pic on site). Buzzards (old handlers)? Bees (young bait like Tyler/Robby)? Honeypot compromise team luring Kirk? All converging at the event—too "coincidental." Tyler's bio? 4.0 GPA STEM genius at Utah State—one semester in Center for Anticipatory Intelligence (CAI). Run by ex-CIA Jennifer Johnson & Langley Brass. Then... POOF. Vanishes 4 YRS til the hit. Theory: Undercover with CAI/CIA blackmail squad across UT campuses (USU, UVU, UofU, Utah Tech). "Anticipatory"? They predict false flags 'cause THEY ORCHESTRATE 'EM—snipers, explosives, the works. Gov backs it: Cox, trans agenda cover, state Capitol announcements. Metadata SCREAMS TEAM. Phil Lyman's Uranium One/Q-clearance ties? White Mesa mill? Layers: Israel angles, Warp Speed echoes (Paul Mango ops from Huntsville). Unique's "fastest growing" with ZERO customers? Blackwater-style front. Kirk exposed too much—TPUSA threat to the machine. From Webb: "Why query Tyler day-before in gov spots? Maxfield 2 days early? Team involved—like Angleton/Oswald. Goth concentration? CAI's the key to missing years—technical guy on honeypot crew." Spot on. This was gov-sanctioned. Evidence: searches, plane vanish, cam hit, goth nexus, CIA semester, ghost years. Got tips? Docs/connections? DM on X or email me [listed on my profile]. But NO contact/harassment of anyone i mention —innocent til proven. Let us pros investigate. FOLLOW @RealGeorgeWebb1 For More... What’s your take—team hit or "coincidence"? Share to expose the cover-up!

Video Transcript AI Summary
Baron Coleman researched who searched on the full name Tyler James Robinson before the assassination. “The two places in The United States that came up for that search … were Huntsville, Alabama and Washington DC.” Coleman also looked at Derek Maxfield, who owns the plane. “Derek Maxfield is this billionaire who owns this plane called Unique.” He describes Unique as a cosmetics company like Nu Skin based in Provo, Utah, with multilevel marketing like Amway. The program allegedly flew “three times in one day from Page, Arizona,” and he questions why searches on Maxfield occurred in Huntsville and DC on the seventh “if he's not part of an op.” He ties Redstone Arsenal, space and missile defense, and references Operation Warp Speed, a related base, and a “Provo compromise operation” with “Q level Lyman” linked to uranium One and Bear Ears. Speaker 1 notes Utah State’s Center of Anticipatory Intelligence, run by CIA-affiliated Jennifer Johnson; Tyler supposedly “starts his program and disappears” as part of a team, emphasizing metadata and a team rather than a lone shooter, with “trans agenda” as cover for intelligence.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: A guy by the name of Baron Coleman did some research on who searched on the full name, Tyler James Robinson, before the assassination on the the ninth. And Tyler James Robinson's are pretty specific search. And the two places in The United States that came up for that search and big hits, big spikes that Baron Coleman talked about were in Huntsville, Alabama and Washington DC. Huntsville, Alabama and Washington DC. And again, that type of foreknowledge or premonition or presaging typically tells us that, hey, something's going on. There's a team involved here. Coleman also looked at this named Derek Maxfield who owns the plane. Derek Maxfield is this billionaire who owns this plane called Unique. Unique is this cosmetics company like Nu Skin based in Provo, Utah, multilevel marketing like Amway, similar signature to Blackwater with Nancy DeVos or Betsy DeVos and and Prince in in Grand Rapids sort of it's sort of like Amway in Provo. They don't seem to have any customers, but they say they're the fastest growing company in the world, and they've got this jet that's going back and forth, back and forth, back and forth. The program about three times in one day from Page, Arizona, which is south along the border in Arizona and Utah. So it does give you this idea that it could be a team. It could be a q level clearance type operation. Again, why in Huntsville are they searching on Derek Maxfield on the seventh if he's not a part of an op? Right? Why are they searching on Derek Maxfield in Washington DC on the seventh if he's not part of an op. Why why you know, what somebody was in you interested in unique makeup. And, again, I'm saying it's in Huntsville and Washington DC. Huntsville is the Redstone Arsenal. It is space and missile defense. If you haven't followed us in the past, we talk about a lot of major government live exercises that kinda go out of there like Paul Mango running something called operation warp speed out of space and missile defense. Really? Yeah. Base and missile defense. Winber or Winber, Pennsylvania, flight 93 was run by this space and missile defense. That's the same guy who runs the coronavirus operation with Nick Jacobs and Paul Malone Bob Malone. It's just kind of funny. It could be that there was some kind of Washington DC firm that also makes space makeup, and they wanted Terry Perry to promote this new line of space makeup. And so we needed people at space and missile defense command to be involved. I mean, we we needed people at NASA to be involved in the space makeup. But it's hard to it's hard to understand why you would get two hot spot hits in Huntsville, Alabama, Missile and Space Command, and then also NASA or some kind of Department of Energy in Washington DC on Derek Maxfield on the seventh. And it's hard to understand why you would get a full hit on Tyler James Tyler James Robinson on the day before the assassination. Again, so these things don't lead you to believe that it's a lone gunman. Right? If you're it's sort of like Lee Harvey Oswald's file being on James Angleton's desk a week before the assassination. How many times does Angleton call for the Oswald file a week before the assassination? It just doesn't give you this is sort of the same thing. It it it gives you pause. Why are you querying at these two key government locations? Why are you querying this guy who's gonna do the assassination the next day? It sort of reminds you of the Oswald file on Angleton's desk. I'm sorry, but it does. Now we it took us sixty years to know that about Angleton. We finally got it in the last tranche of JFK documents, but we know that right now. We know that the Oswald file is on somebody's desk in Washington DC, full name, a day before the assassination. And then this Provo con compromise operation that seems to be running is also of interest. Q level Lyman. Yeah. Lyman because of his involvement with uranium one and the Bear Ears uranium plantation and the White Mesa uranium mill might have a q level clearance here so that's very true. You get this this concentration of things going on here with tall guy standing up with a big nose dressed exactly like Tyler. You have Tyler going along the Phil Lyman glass. You have Phil Lyman behind the Phil Lyman glass. You got the two goth girls. The the goth girls are from this club called Buzzards and Bees. This is a compromised operation in Downtown Provo. Buzzards are the old guys like me. Right? The bees are the people are the that are the pollinators. They're the Tylers and the the Robbie Hills, the young, you know, bait. And also girls are also but they're dressed up as goths, you can't tell if they're girls or guys. And the guys are dressed up as girls. Also, Twiggs, I think, is involved in this. Uncle Mikey Mitchell is involved in this kind of lure operation. They're doing it at all the campuses and all the universities. Why are all of those goth people, right, from buzzards and bees, why are they all right there in this little concentration? Now it could be like, hey, buzzards and bees buzzards and bees for and goth people for Charlie Kirk. I mean, it could be just that. It isn't simple. But it does seem to be this odd concentration and that tends you tend to think, hey. This is a team. Anyway, I'll go to the next video here. Speaker 1: Okay. Hello, everyone. George Webb here at Utah State University, home of the Aggies here in Logan, Utah, and this is the building for the Center of Anticipatory Intelligence. The Center of Anticipatory Intelligence. What do those letters spell out to? CAI. Well, that's convenient because the person who runs this, Jennifer Johnson, is CIA, and the top three people are CIA that run this building. It's a beautiful old building here on Old Main Hill. But the key to this is this is where, of course, Tyler Robinson starts his program and then disappears. He's one of the top students in America in engineering, in STEM, and then he disappears off the map. Now what we put forward is he's a part of a team. He's he's didn't flunk out at all. As a matter of fact, he's one of the technical members of a team. Right? And these things are very good. These teams are very good at anticipating false flags, anticipating things like the Charlie Kirk murder because they're the ones that do them. So you become very good at anticipating things when you're the one who does them. If you have the weapons team, if you have the sniper team, if you have the explosives team, you become very good at predicting when things are gonna happen because you're the ones doing them. And this is the key to the missing years. We have the missing years with Tyler. Right? This is gonna be the key to the missing years. He's working with his team members in this Intermountain, intelligence organization. Right? He's working with his team members at different campuses, Salt Lake City Campus, University of Utah. This is Utah State, of course. And Utah Tech down in into Saint George where we were on the tenth, the day of the shooting. But this is the key to our metadata. We're tracking the metadata of the team. Right? We're not arguing about the amphitheater anymore. We're not arguing about this shot, the microphone, and all these other things. Because all those things lead us to the same conclusion, right, that there is a team involved. So if you're looking for a team, the best thing to do is collect the metadata of the team, go for the team's metadata, and then you'll have the team. If if you follow Tyler's team, it's it's it's arm players. It's it's not hard to follow. They have they announce everything they do publicly. They're on the state capital steps. The governor supports this. Trevor Cox supports this. But with the trans agenda sort of being the cover for this intelligence, they're in the same building. Right? There's all the muckety mucks here at the university. This is the center for anticipatory intelligence.
ProjectConstitu
Posted - October 10, 2025 at 7:35 PM
Saved - October 10, 2025 at 8:49 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’ve spent hours reviewing footage and claim I solved it: not Tyler Robinson, but Operation 332—3 patsies, 3 shooters (BA sniper, palm shooter from security, and a tent remote gun), plus 2 distractions (Zen and Lyman). The BA sniper, stocky in cargo pants, fired the neck shot from the roof, then escaped. Palm shooter hit center mass to seal the cover. Inside job, pros only, possibly state actors. See the screenshot, download, share, and demand answers. He’s out there.

@ProjectConstitu - Project Constitution

🚨BREAKING NEWS: The REAL Charlie Kirk Killer CAUGHT on Camera Running Away, Not Tyler! —TRUE Assassin SPOTTED Fleeing Roof I know it's long but trust me you want to watch it in full, it includes airtight evidence that this is the main shooter. After 100s of hours digging—muzzle flash, IR beam, bullet trajectory, sound mapping—it's SOLVED. Not Tyler Robinson's lone wolf BS from 150yds. This was OPERATION 332: 3 patsies (Tyler, cell phone gun guy, pistol patsy, t), 3 shooters (BA sniper + palm shooter from his OWN SECURITY, and tent remote fired gun), 2 distractions (George Zen & Phil Lyman). The BA SNIPER? That stocky dude in cargo pants, thick shirt, reflective shades—running GUILTY across the bridge 23 secs post-shot. Dropped from the admin building roof, fired the kill shot to Kirk's neck, then bolted like hell. Palm shooter hit center mass for the "front" cover-up. Inside job, pros only. State actors? You connect the dots. WHO IS THIS GUY? Screenshot, download, SHARE EVERYWHERE. Tag @CharlieKirkTPUSA, @realDonaldTrump, @FBI, @CandaceOwens —demand answers! He's out there. We expose him NOW. [Image: Blurry still of stocky man mid-run on bridge, glasses/glasses, beard? Cargo pants visible —clearer image in comments below to circulate!] RT if you're with us—humanity over handlers! 👊

Video Transcript AI Summary
"I said that the sniper, the BA sniper, actually shot from right here." This is where the BA sniper shot from, right here. "The first shot was taken from the BA sniper." "That little blink that you just saw, that is the actual flash that's coming from the muzzle of the sniper rifle." He ties the event to "the infrared beam" and notes "This is why the infrared beam was on the cell phone." He describes "the arm pop out behind the cell phone to give the signal to take the shot." "This is your guy right here. This is him." He asks, "Who is he? Where is he going?" He states "The man was killed by his own team" and adds "scratch it." He references "This is Phil Lyman right here in the middle of your screen" and points to "That person in the red circle right there, that's the sniper. He came from this location right here." He concludes, "This is your guy" and reiterates, "So whatever everybody's telling you, scratch it."
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I said that the sniper, the BA sniper, actually shot from right here. Okay? And I meant exactly what I said. This is where the BA sniper shot from, right here. And it was the hardest thing ever to get a good angle to show you guys that, but I'll I'll let me drop down and show you a couple different things. Right? I wanna show you guys how I actually found the sniper, and I'm gonna show you in quick fashion how I found them. So the first shot was taken from the BA sniper. Now I want you guys to see where that circle is. That's where the action is gonna be. This is where you're going to see, an actual flash. I wanna prove to you, easily prove to you that where this flash is coming from because we're gonna couple this flash with the bullet and with the actual infrared beam itself. Now I'm gonna zoom in so you can see it a little bit better. Look. See that quick little it's a quick little blink. Look how quick it is. That right there. Did you see it? One more time. Right there. Boom. Alright. So that little blink that you just saw, that is the actual flash that's coming from the muzzle of the sniper rifle. Now why is that important? Now we're gonna go from the muzzle flash. We're gonna find you a still frame of the actual bullet itself. Now this is a little bit difficult to watch, but I'm gonna show you where the actual bullet is. Of course, this is highly blurred out, so you can't see anything and make anything out, but we're gonna go through this together real quick. And I'm keeping the sound off purposely so you guys can, you know, so it doesn't get any violations. Now I have a arrow here pointing to it because I want you guys to be able to see it. Let's go over there and look at it. We'll see if we could see it with this arrow turned up like that. There we go. It's literally for a second. There you go. There it is. And this is why I did it like this too. I'm just gonna let it play one time so you guys could actually see where the arrow's at. Just look at where the arrow's at. There. I could show you in slow motion too. That way, you guys could actually know where the actual bullet is at yourself. You don't have to worry about somebody else showing you. Now there's better renderings, but I can't get them past the sensors without blurring it tremendously. And you can kinda see it go by, you know, there. Again, I can't show you guys anything gruesome because they'll they'll block me. They'll ban me. You can kinda see the shadow of the bullet right there. I'm showing you the flash. I'm showing you exactly where the bullet is, and I have to kinda show you where it's coming from here. You'll notice that right here is the guy with the cell phone. Okay? That's sitting right next to Charlie. This is right here, the guy with the cell phone. The bullet is right here. Okay? Now if the bullet is right here and this is the guy with the cell phone, this is the bullet that's going right towards the back, the top right ear right here, and it's coming down, remember, a downward trajectory. So we have the muzzle flask reflection, and I'm calling it a reflection for a reason. We have the bullet itself. And let's go to now we have the infrared beam. Now when I show you this, this is what brought me to the conclusion that I came to. Watch this, guys. Watch very closely. Pay attention. If I can do this off my cell phone, the FBI should be embarrassed. Now mind you, we're not gonna get to this guy up front over here. Not gonna get to him just yet. Okay? Let's pause it. I'm gonna show you guys something that everybody missed. Shout out to Steven Bennoone. Steven Bennoone found this information. And, brother, thank you. You you you helped solve this. Now I'm I'm ex, ex military. Steven, Bennoon is ex CIA. And but he has converted his life. He speaks out against, nation states that control The United States. Speaks out against the things that are going on in The United States. Powerful guy. So so look at this. I want you to pay attention to this guy's cell phone. Look at this. Right as he was getting shot. Right here. This is when the sniper drops his beam down. He barely dropped his beam down and it landed on this guy's cell phone. It was trained. The whole time you'll see the arm pop out behind the cell phone to give the signal to take the shot. You're right here. This guy is doing a signal right beside Charlie. This is the guy's arm that we saw in the video. And this guy, I think he's moving off of an audio signal. They're all they all have their their microphones on or they all have their earpieces on. And everybody started moving at the same time. This guy this guy put out the signal, I believe, for the BA sniper, so that he can see. I'm about to show you how he positions his body to move it so that the BA sniper can actually see him. He puts himself in the sunlight, and he takes a little bit of a step back as he gives the signal to take the shot. Simultaneously, this guy right here hears it come over the microphone, and he turns and he takes his shot with a recoil that comes from his hand from his palm pistol. Counting or not counting gang violence. Great. Oh, that really looked like it that time. You know, there's probably two or three people in the crowd that have a gun. Speaker 1: Hang on. Oh. And then they say that you could see so it looks like he's pretending to pull up his sleeve and he has a palm gun. That's what it looks like. And there's the bullet. Speaker 0: And, again, his shot hits second, though, and I'm gonna show you exactly where there it is. It was right there the whole time. After after the first shot hit him and expanded his neck and put this what looked like it looked like his microphone blew up. Now you guys can see clearly the microphone did not blow up. It's still there. These are little magnets that slide off real easy. Anybody saying that this blew up, that it did not blow up. I don't know if it was set to blow up. That could be another theory, a possibility. Maybe it was a detonated device that just didn't go off in there. I don't know. But I know that it did not cause a discharge that went through Charlie's body or anything like that. So he was not shot with a camera phone from behind. That that's not what took him out. He was not blown up by this device right here. That's not what took him out either. But what we all missed was right there in the middle of the screen. When Charlie's shirt was puffed out from getting hit in the back of the head from that first round. Now mind you, you cannot fake the infrared beam. You can't fake the flash in the window. You can't fake the bullet coming at the same exact trajectory that the infrared beam was on. You cannot fake any of that stuff. If you have a bullet, if you have a gun muzzle flash in the window, and if you have an infrared beam, trust me, the gun is somewhere in that direction. Let me go ahead and show you guys what it looks like frame by frame so you know how the sniper shot hit first, and you'll understand how the shirt poofed out at the top. As the shirt was poofed out at the as it was poofed out, he got hit from here, from about the left hand side right near the heart area. That's why I said Charlie Kirk had no chance. He he passed away instantly. Watch. Okay? Just pay attention to But the shot came in and look at his neck expansion. The neck completely expands. And I don't wanna get too graphic here, but I want you guys to see how this part of the neck right here is pushed up into the left, up into the left, as all of this is right here is kinda blown out, if you will, from the expansion of the bullet dropping down into right here. Okay? Now pay attention to it. Again, I don't want it to be too graphic, but we took out the the actual you know, from where the the bullet came out, we took that part out. So here, again, the bullet hits right there. Okay? Now at this very second, this next second, this is why it was all on cue and for the shots to go off at the same time so that all the shots ended up sounding like one. That is the second that he got hit with the second shot. Boom. Look at that. Center mask, guys. Right there is clear as day. Just like the graphic I showed you. Just so you know, I'm not, like, altering anything or anything like that. I'm just showing you what's actually there in front of your faces. Like, they wanna play us, but they don't understand some of us will take the time to go through this stuff frame by frame. But this is the only evidence that I know of anybody who's talking about it from this standpoint is showing it from this standpoint. Okay? Look at that. He's hit. And the moment after he's hit, he's hit with a second shot right in the middle. I mean, these shots are back to back. Boom. Boom. Boom. Boom. Just like that. K? That flash that we saw, remember I told you the muzzle? I called it the muzzle flash reflection. Friends and family, look at this. So if the sniper is shooting from here, from this position and I'm gonna show you the sniper too. Okay? I I got you guys. I've worked on this detailed. So if he's shooting from here, right, his flash would have been caught by this super reflective wall. Look how reflective this wall is. This table is way over here, and this is reflecting off of the wall. This wall entire wall can reflect this muzzle flash coming from this guy's, from this guy's rifle right here. Now mind you, he has to just shoot down a straight path, again, right into the tent here, and it's the only line of sight that you can have because remember what we did in the beginning, this wall is too high. You can't stand anywhere else and have a beam. There's nowhere else to have a beam. There's nowhere else to have an infrared beam besides this hidden location. This hidden location on top of the BA Building gives you that. You cannot no one can see you. This balcony was closed off that day, so no one was on that balcony. And, oh, yeah, right here right here is a a rail. And this rail would have been provided any kind of reflection or obscurity so that anybody in a crouched position here would not have been seen. There's nobody out there to see them. Now here's the thing. Here's the kicker. Let me help you guys out. Even though that may be the case, look what we have here. We have security cameras, guys. There are security cameras out here. Okay? So if we can get the camera and if it's a one eighty camera, it would have caught this muzzle flash at the same time too. So let's press UVU to give us that camera footage off the side of this building here and from that little, outside area there, and we could probably be able to we might be able to see something. Who knows? I don't know. The angle is kinda weird. I think this is why they picked this location because there's just no camera that can pick that up. And if you're there in a crouched position, no one can see. So if I knew that my guy was at the top of the BA Building, all I was trying to do was find information, knowledge that would put me in the position to see where I can get the best footage from, this is Phil Lyman right here in the middle of your screen. Alright? That's Phil Lyman as you, you know, if you saw part two, then you know There. The funny thing about the Phil film that they showed with Phil Lyman is it He's running through the crowd and then boom, set the row. That little cut right there is interesting. We'll just, you know, kinda say that. It's a very, very interesting kinda cut, what I'm talking about. I'm not gonna go over anything with Phil right now, or his family. That person in the red circle right there, that's the sniper. That is the sniper right there. He came from this location right here. I'm gonna cut. And if you'll see here, I'm gonna zoom it in real quick. We'll see the BA sniper for about two frames right there up near my avatar right there, and then boom, gone just like that. So it seems as though this video was cut, it was edited, and the very first day that the BA sniper was actually seen was during the Phil Lyman interview, and I think that that's quite interesting. So I wanna go ahead and, give you a higher quality, like, bigger version. So let's take a look at this individual. This is uncut. Look at the frantic running. Can you see that? Look at the frantic running. And I said in the video yesterday, who is that? And I'm saying it again today. Who is that? Screenshot it if you need to, guys. Slow it down for you real quick too. There you go. We're gonna slow it down real quick for you so you get a really good view of this. Who is this guy? Overdressed. Now let me certify and tell you guys exactly why I know that that's the guy. And it's very easy to understand. You're gonna walk with me through it so that nobody can talk you out of your position when you explain why this is the actual Pay attention. Right here. I think it's been shooting. There's been a shooting. We heard shots we heard shots. Alright. We can stop it right there. We can stop it right there. Now you say about thirty somewhere between thirty one and thirty three seconds is when he got to us. Okay? When he ran across here and he got to us. Let's take this bad boy back. I'm gonna actually show you something. Watch this. If he was to shoot from this part of the roof right here, exactly where I said he was, if he took a shot from this part of the roof, it's nothing to drop down right here and run across this bridge. This part of the roof is actually open. Did you hear what I said? This part of the roof is open. He could have taken this shot easily from this position and dropped down right here and ran across. Here's the shot. Watch this one. Eight seconds. Position above the 10 so we can't You notice that eight seconds is when we heard the shot. No. I stopped it at nine, but we heard it at eight seconds exactly. Okay? So Boom. Eight seconds. We hear the shot. Now from eight seconds until we get to this rail is almost another ten seconds. Look at that. Eighteen seconds. Okay? Nineteen seconds. By the time we turn right here at twenty seconds let me show you. We'll keep it right there. Nineteen seconds. We'll go over. I'm gonna show you something. At this point in time right here is when you can first start to see him. Now it's gonna be harder for you guys because you're, you know, you're gonna get a different quality of this, but I'm gonna show you right here. His feet are going to start appearing right here, right in this area that you see right here. So he's not running from over here, from over here. He's running from this direction, right in his vein. Watch. And he's the only one doing it. You see his feet right there? That's him right there. Watch this. Here he comes. He goes to that first level of tape right there. K? And he's booking it. And he gets to the second level, and he's out of there. Now let's take an let's take a look at him, guys. Let's really key in on this. He's wearing cargo pants. He has on a thicker shirt, which we need which I thought it was a coat at first. Okay? Swore it was a coat at first. It's not a coat. It's a thick shirt, though. Very thick shirt for this day, and he's already a stocky guy. But but you can see there that it's a short sleeve shirt. You can see the type of glasses he has on. I said, man, this dude looks like a sniper, but this collar is pulled up all the way around his neck, these reflective sunglasses that he has on, and he is the only human, the only human after that shot to make this run across the bridge. Why am I focusing on just him? One, all of the timing works out 100% perfect to being him. So what I figured in my head is if I take this shot, drop down from this position, that's all within three to four seconds, five seconds maybe. Shot, boom, drop down, and take off running. A guy of his size across a bridge of this size, he should be able to take the shot, drop down, start running, and be there between twenty to maybe twenty three seconds. That's what I'm assuming. You talk about 40 yard dashes, and if we're talking about professionals, some of these guys are trained professionals. He looks he's he's stocky, but he's not out of shape. That's a difference. He's stocky, but he's not out of shape. This guy this guy right here. Stop for that. Now here's the problem. I'm gonna pause it. You see these steps right here? If he was really trying to help Charlie, if he was a part of his security detail, he'd have ran down these steps and immediately started helping Charlie at his tent and help him in security detail. If he was a part of the faculty or staff, he would immediately went into one of these buildings like all of the other people did. They all went from here and went to those buildings or got off of those steps. They got out of the area. He is the only one who crossed across the yellow tape, the box that was there was a box that was positioned here above Charlie. There was a yellow tape there, yellow tape there, where people were locked in or or locked out of that particular area. He is the only one who breached that tape and ran across. The only one. Okay? So when I see this person running across and getting there in exactly twenty seconds, I wanna go back and show you guys. Watch this. After the shot goes off, watch how much time it is before he actually passes us. Okay? I want you guys to see this with your own eyes so nobody can trick you out of your position. Alright. We're gonna hear the shot at eight seconds. Well, we already know the shot is at eight seconds. The shot just happened. Right? Now we get to the rail. Okay? Now it's our it's gonna be our first time at the rail over here seeing him come through. Here he is right there. Those are his feet right here. He's about to breach that teeth that's there. Now from eight seconds until twenty two, twenty three seconds, we're fifteen seconds in. He's booking it, though. He's moving. He crosses us at about thirty one seconds. That means from the time that the shot was taken at eight seconds is when we heard the shot until thirty one seconds. That's twenty three seconds it would have taken for him to take the shot, jump down, and run. Now where did he run to? You're saying, oh, maybe he ran down to go help on the other side. I'm glad you said that. I'm glad you said that. That's why we got Google Maps. So let me first show you this. One, here is exactly where he dropped down. I was assuming he took the shot from right here. Okay? Right around this area right here to reflect off of this wall right here to create the muzzle flash reflection off of this wall onto that window. I was assuming he was right about here, okay, to take the shot. I would have thought that he would have went this way to escape so that he could stay out of the visibility of anybody who's inside of this area over here. Nope. His thumb behind dropped down between this hole right here. Just how these little holes are at the top? He dropped down between this hole and ran out of here. Just like that. He dropped through here and ran out of here, and he shot Charlie from here. That's the line of sight. This is why Charlie was able to get hit in the back of the head with an infrared beam. This is why the infrared beam was on the cell phone. This is why, guys. So look. I'm gonna show you guys something here. Now if he ran across this bridge look at this. The only other staircase is over here. The staircase lets down. That's an inconvenient staircase to Charlie's position and where the security detail is. So if he's security detail trying to reach Charlie, he's definitely gonna go that way. But if he's trying to get away, he's not going that way. He's actually going this way. And I believe he ran down those steps and had a vehicle parked right here. Let's zoom out so I can show you where that is. Alright. So I believe that he took the shot here, dropped down through here, ran across here. Oops. I'm sorry, guys. Go back. Ran across here like this, came up here, ran across, and then literally dropped down right here into this area where these cars are right here and took off from there. So, you know, never to be seen again. As you can see, there's a little backwards way to get up out of there. I think that's our guy. Matter of fact, I don't think that's our guy. I know that's our guy. And if you're watching this with me, prove me wrong. Again, he was even seen right there. His feet were seen right there, and now we have him right here. It took twenty three seconds the time the shot was taken, and for him to get across the bridge to get away, If he was a part of the security detail, he would have ran down the steps that were right there. He did not run down the steps. He did not check on Charlie to look over the edge. He didn't do any of those things. Instead, he took off. He fled like his life depended on it. Who is he? Where is he going? And those are the questions that we should be asking, guys, because there's obviously something going on here where they're trying to sell us, Tyler Robinson as the main guy. He's not the main guy. This is your guy right here. This is him. One second, Mark. We just proved it right here in this video. I'm not gonna do it twice. You can just rewind it to see it again. Okay? It's that simple, guys. So whatever everybody's telling you, scratch it. Whatever the pundits are telling you on TV, scratch it. All the left right dividing stuff, scratch it. The man was killed by his own team. He was unalive by his own team. Now who paid them to do it? Why they did it? I'll let you guys figure that part out. My
ProjectConstitu
Posted - October 14, 2025 at 12:26 AM
Saved - October 14, 2025 at 5:24 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m detailing a multi-post thread that claims Israeli and DC IPs stalked Charlie Kirk’s circle for months, none of it a lone gunman story but a coordinated hit by the “Zionist Machine.” I cite screenshots and a July 2025 spike tied to Tucker Carlson’s AM Fest appearance, tracing digs into TPUSA figures, Utah sites, and other names. Posts 1–10 lay out this alleged web of surveillance, planning, and alleged targets, urging readers to judge.

@ProjectConstitu - Project Constitution

🚨 BREAKING: The Charlie Kirk Assassination Plot Deepens – Israel & DC IPs Were STALKING His ENTIRE CIRCLE for MONTHS! This is NO "Lone Gunman" BS – It's a Coordinated Hit by the Zionist Machine! Remember my last post dropping Google Trends bombs on how "Kathryn Nesbitt" spiked right before Charlie's murder? Yeah, that was just the tip. I've dug DEEPER – and holy hell, it's a rabbit hole of Israeli & Washington DC IP addresses searching EVERYTHING tied to Charlie's inner circle, his TPUSA crew, and even his would-be assassins' hideouts. Most hits? Around JULY 20, 2025 – exactly 2 months before they took him out. And guess what? That's the SAME WEEK Charlie platformed TUCKER CARLSON at AMFEST in Florida for the FIRST TIME. Coincidence? Or did Israel see Tucker + Charlie as the ultimate threat to their endless wars & AIPAC cash grabs? You decide. 😡I've got SCREENSHOTS FROM GOOGLE TRENDS proving IPs in ISRAEL & DC were obsessing over: Lance Twiggs' Townhouse (Assassin's Pad): 3419 S River Road, St. George UT – searched NONSTOP from Dec '24 to Sep '25. "Lance Twiggs" + address spikes? They KNEW where he lived. Tyler's Digital Footprint: "Tyler Robinson Discord/Reddit/FBI/LDS/TPUSA/Israel" – from June '24 to Nov '24. They tracked his EVERY MOVE online. Why? To recruit or silence? TPUSA Insiders & Allies: "Cooper Brown TPUSA," "Dr. Frank Turek," "Eric Bolling," "Professor Mark Harlin," "Jamal Reed," "Jeff Gray" – all searched in July-Aug '25. Charlie's team was in the crosshairs. Utah Valley University (The Kill Site): "UVU Rooftop/Gun/Parking/CCTV/Layout/Losee Center" – May-July '25. They SCOUTED the campus like pros. "Utah Valley University buildings" in Aug '24? PRE-PLANNED. Political Hits: "Phil Lyman," "Phil Lyman Tiffany Barker LDS," "Derek Maxfield," "Mike Mitchell Utah," "Rick Cutler" – July '25 spikes. GOP threats to Israel's grip? Weird Ties: "George Zinn 9/11," "Erwin Steele Caldera," "Gernot Ohner," "Dr. Elena Vasquez," "Rusty Needs," "Lisa Thornton," "Dan Flood," "Rob Hild" – scattered but timed to the plot. 9/11 echoes? Mossad playbook? Health & Cover-Ups: "Timpanogos Regional Hospital," "Intermountain Health," "Dixie Technical College" – post-July searches. Planning the "accident" narrative? Full list below – I could go ON FOREVER (it's endless), but this proves: ISRAEL + DEEP STATE = CHARLIE'S KILLERS. They feared his America First fire exposing their scams. @TuckerCarlson next? WAKE UP, PATRIOTS! Share this BEFORE they scrub it. Who's REALLY running the show? RT if you want JUSTICE! 🔥🇺🇸 More Screenshots In The Post Below Too

@ProjectConstitu - Project Constitution

Part 2: 🚨 BREAKING: The Charlie Kirk Assassination Plot Deepens – Israel & DC IPs Were STALKING His ENTIRE CIRCLE for MONTHS! This is NO "Lone Gunman" BS – It's a Coordinated Hit by the Zionist Machine! https://t.co/ZKWakGVoIC

@ProjectConstitu - Project Constitution

@firebrandlatina @RealCandaceO @tpvsean @IanCarrollShow @RyanMattaMedia @HustleBitch_ @Black_Scout @ZebBoykin @TuckerCarlson @RealAlexJones @realjesseonfire oh thats right. i get them names of those damn things mixed up. thanks. oh well. too late to edit it now though

@ProjectConstitu - Project Constitution

@FoodTravelUSA @RealCandaceO @tpvsean @IanCarrollShow @RyanMattaMedia @HustleBitch_ @Black_Scout @ZebBoykin @TuckerCarlson @RealAlexJones @realjesseonfire we want to talk to anyone inside @TPUSA who will speak to us. we will keep them anonymous if they want.

@ProjectConstitu - Project Constitution

@S18tx @RealCandaceO @tpvsean @IanCarrollShow @RyanMattaMedia @HustleBitch_ @Black_Scout @ZebBoykin @TuckerCarlson @RealAlexJones @realjesseonfire yes. i only included the names of the people that gave me a hit

@ProjectConstitu - Project Constitution

@wanalatte17 @RealCandaceO @tpvsean @IanCarrollShow @RyanMattaMedia @HustleBitch_ @Black_Scout @ZebBoykin @TuckerCarlson @RealAlexJones @realjesseonfire that is NOT where the shooter was but yes he is highly suspicious and in on it.

@ProjectConstitu - Project Constitution

@OOTCMAGA @RealCandaceO @tpvsean @IanCarrollShow @RyanMattaMedia @HustleBitch_ @Black_Scout @ZebBoykin @TuckerCarlson @RealAlexJones @realjesseonfire it's wild of big this is and how much planning and forethought they did.

@ProjectConstitu - Project Constitution

they have been plaing Charile's hit for a LONG time apparently. If you want today;s video by @tpvsean it all lines up. he uncovered a recently de-classifed CIA document outlining exactly what they did to Charlie and their plan to do it to 4 more big conservative influencer's as well.

@ProjectConstitu - Project Constitution

@JNewt21 @RealCandaceO @tpvsean @IanCarrollShow @RyanMattaMedia @HustleBitch_ @Black_Scout @ZebBoykin @TuckerCarlson @RealAlexJones @realjesseonfire correct

@ProjectConstitu - Project Constitution

@ent_socal @RealCandaceO @tpvsean @IanCarrollShow @RyanMattaMedia @HustleBitch_ @Black_Scout @ZebBoykin @TuckerCarlson @RealAlexJones @realjesseonfire 🎯

ProjectConstitu
Posted - October 16, 2025 at 8:29 PM
Saved - October 17, 2025 at 5:01 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I uncover alleged UVU Charlie Kirk incident cover-up: dormant LLCs revived, AG-linked figures, and a ghost-paving scheme by Hardscape Specialties tied to UVU insiders. Geneva Rock and Lasai LLC allegedly verify and hide traces, with CTC connections and HealthEquity ties whispered. Derek Brown’s office, Powell, Romrell named in schemes; rushed, bid-less paving days after the event. I demand receipts and answers from all players.

@ProjectConstitu - Project Constitution

🚨 BOMBSHELL EXPOSÉ: UVU's Charlie Kirk Assassination Cover-Up Runs DEEP – AG Insider-Owned Ghost Company Paves the Scene, Fraud Ties, & Shady Plane Connections! Folks, if you thought the rushed paving over Charlie Kirk's murder site at UVU on Sept 10, 2025 – just DAYS later, grass torn up, bricks slammed down, evidence VANISHED – was suspicious, hold my coffee. I dug like hell, hit up UVU insiders (off-record, but legit), and uncovered a cesspool of dormant LLCs, Attorney General cronies, and fraud ghosts. This ain't "renovation." It's erasure. And it gets DARKER. The culprits? Hardscape Specialties LLC – formed 2005, DEAD for 20 years. Zombified in FEBRUARY 2025, right before Kirk's rally. Owners? Michael Powell, SPECIAL AGENT under Utah AG Derek Brown, who in 2019 filed the affidavit nailing ex-UVU Asst Dean Jennifer Clegg for siphoning $350K+ from the College of Tech & Computing (she got canned in 2016 for it). Powell probed UVU's dirty finances... now his pet corpse-company "honors" the site by burying it under concrete? 🤨 Clegg's fraud? Straight from UVU's own statement – Powell's fingerprints all over. Powell's co-owner? Burton Romrell, longtime UVU ops guy who assisted Powell on "cases" there. Sources spill: Romrell overlapped with Powell's UVU digs. Hardscape's Articles of Org? Lists 'em both, Lehi UT address screams Powell. They revive a 20-year ghost and snag the gig to scrub Kirk's blood? Rushed job, no bids, started Sept 14 – 4 days post-hit. Bricks now hold mementos like a twisted shrine. Enter Geneva Rock Products Inc., Utah's concrete overlords. They slam a BUSINESS CERTIFICATE VERIFICATION on Hardscape... 72 HOURS post-resurrection. Scripted AF. Their reg agents? Delaware shadows. Filing history? Fresh 2025 stamps, like they had the playbook. And here's the kicker: Geneva Rock files under CTC (Corporation Trust Company) – SAME outfit tied to the TWO SUSPICIOUS PLANES that buzzed the Kirk event (you know, the ones vanishing off radar?). Oh, and Lasai LLC? Loops right back to Geneva Rock's web. Coincidence in a "historical global event" cover-up? Nah. Geneva pulled the SAME verification on Keeper Adventures LLC – another zombie! Inactive til MAY 19, 2025, helmed by Dr. Stephen Neeleman of Timpanogos Hospital (Intermountain Healthcare). Neeleman's HealthEquity empire? Billions. Why wake THIS "adventures" outfit post-assassination and verify it? Neeleman's got DOZENS of entities co-registered with Scott Cutler, HealthEquity CEO – whispers say Scott's kin to Rick Cutler, deep Utah power player. Adventures in what? Hiding tracks? Overseeing the madness? AG Derek Brown (elected '24, all "anti-Big Gov" vibes), Powell's direct boss. His office "fought" UVU fraud via Powell... who then paves the murder spot? Brown kin to Cooper Brown? Family webs in UT politics run thicker than concrete. UVU's core? Rotten – fraud in 2016, cover-up in 2025. Insiders: "Powell's firm just... materialized. No process." This is HUGE. AG agent owns the pavers? Ghost corps revived for the "honor"? Fraud echoes, plane ghosts via CTC/Geneva/Lasai? DEMAND ANSWERS! Tag @RealCandaceO @IanCarrollShow and @RealAlexJones – RT if you're raging, let's crack this wide! Who's pulling strings? 🔽I'll Drop All The RECEIPT'S In The Comment's Below.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Colin, of Project Constitution, references a clip posted on Hustle Bitch in which a man claimed to work for Hardscape LLC and described beautifying an area by removing grass, clearing Charlie’s location, and laying bricks—stating it took two days. The second speaker says about a week and a half earlier he received a call from Utah state maintenance workers asked to beautify an area where a brother had been gunned down. He says he went with a small group of brothers who hold differing beliefs and viewpoints to be useful, despite it being a heavy task. He notes he has received hate online and fake reviews, and states that the answer to hate is love and the answer to falsehood is truth. Colin responds by calling the post “straight up smoke and mirrors” and a “total front job, total psy op,” asserting it is part of a larger web of shady activity that allegedly loops back to the Utah State Attorney General’s office. He asserts that a company inactive for twenty years re-applied in February and landed the job for a historic global event, and that Geneva Rock’s registered agent is based in Delaware. He claims Geneva Rock ran a certificate verification 72 hours after reviving the company, which he says had been inactive for twenty years. He states the same certificate verification was also run on Keeper Adventures, a company run by Doctor Steven Neelman of Tippanogas Hospital, which he claims had been inactive until 2015–2020ish. He adds that Doctor Steven Neelman has many registered companies with Scott Cutler, whom his sources allegedly say is a possible relative of Rick Cutler, who is referred to as palm gun guy. Colin furthermore asserts that Michael Powell is a secret agent to the attorney general who is Derek Brown, and that Powell owns Hardscape LLC, the contracting company that did the paving. He claims Burton Rommel is the other co-owner of Hardscape LLC, and that Rommel worked at Utah Valley University (UVU) prior to that, assisting Powell in certain cases. Colin states Powell testified in a massive fraud case at UVU, with his testimony being crucial in convicting Jennifer Clegg, a UVU employee who he says was an assistant dean to the College of Technology and Computing (CTC) and in charge of finances and operation of TOC, and who was fired in February 2016. Colin concludes by repeating that a company inactive for twenty years supposedly redid the UVU cement just days after Charlie Kirk was shot, destroying the crime scene, and notes that the company is owned by a secret agent of the attorney general and tied to UVU, implying fraud. He urges readers to check the post for a full breakdown of everything.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hey, guys. It's me, Colin, Project Constitution. So I saw this clip posted on hustle bitch of this fella who claims to work for Hardscape LLC going on about, you know, how they beautify the area, yanking up the grass, where Charlie got taken out and slapped down those bricks and, you know, what, two days flat. Speaker 1: What's up, guys? Hey. I just wanna share a quick post here. I got a call about a week and a half ago from a couple of, couple of maintenance guys from the state of Utah that had been asked to replace, to beautify an area where a brother had been gunned down. It was Sunday. Usually don't work on Sunday, but but I needed to be useful. And so I showed up with a couple of my brother, with a couple of other brothers that we all have differing beliefs and differing viewpoints, and together we were useful. It was heavy to work where a brother was gunned down, but we did it. And I've wanted to make a post. I haven't wanted to be controversial. America is founded on people with different beliefs working together. That's exactly what we did that Sunday and that Monday. And I'm getting some hate online for it. I'm getting some fake reviews. And, you know, the answer to hate is love. The answer to falsehood is truth. Speaker 0: That's straight up smoke and mirrors. Total front job, total psy op. That is 100 percent a psy op. It's way bigger. It's a full on web of shady crap looping right back to the Utah State Attorney General's office. So a company that was inactive for twenty years and reapplied back in February lands the job for a historic global event, and Geneva Rock, who's registered agent is based out of Delaware, runs a certificate verification seventy two hours after resurrecting this company that's been inactive for twenty years. The other company that Geneva Rock also ran a business certificate verification on was Keeper Adventures, a company ran by Doctor. Neelman of Tippanogas Hospital. It was a company that had also been inactive until fivenineteentwenty twenty five. Doctor. Steven Neelman has many, many registered companies with a Scott Cutler, who my sources are telling me is a possible relative to Rick Cutler, which is palm gun guy. So let me tell you this much. Michael Powell is a secret agent to the attorney general who is Derek Brown, and he owns Hardscape LLC, the contractors who did the paving. And Burton Rommel is the other co owner of Hardscape LLC, and he worked at UVU prior to that assisting Michael Powell in certain cases. Now Michael Powell, he actually testified in a massive fraud case at UVU where his testimony was crucial in convicting the employee, Jennifer Clegg, with defrauding the university of over $350,000 over the course of several years. He filed an affidavit of probable cause against Jennifer in Utah's fourth district court, February 28. You know, she was a UVU employee for over fifteen years and was the assistant dean to the college of technology and computing, TNC, and was in charge of finances and operation of TOC when she was fired in 02/2016. So to reiterate, a company that was inactive for twenty years got the highest of honor redoing the UVU cement just days after Charlie Kirk was shot, you know, completely destroying the crime scene. And that company just happens to be owned by a secret agent of the attorney general and somebody tied to UVU and there, you know, some fraud going on there. So very, very weird stuff here. So check out everything in the post below where I break everything down.

@ProjectConstitu - Project Constitution

🚨 URGENT: "WTF? Tyler Robinson's Dad Owns the Construction Company That Paved Over Charlie Kirk's Blood? RT If You Demand Answers! Who TF was the construction company that raced to UVU days after Charlie Kirk's assassination? They ripped up the bloody grass where he was shot & slapped down a concrete pad—PLUS re-mudded the tunnel roof behind it. No-one knows who they are. Official silence = sus AF. GROK says Precision Granite & Marble LLC (owned by suspect Tyler Robinson's dad, Matt Robinson). If true? BOMBSHELL cover-up. I've scoured the net for facts—CRICKETS. No names, nada. I have not been able to disprove this yet unfortunately... Know anything? Company? Owner? Pics? DM or, email, or reply NOW. Digging for ties. Let's expose this!

Video Transcript AI Summary
Construction is underway here: they are removing the entire platform where he was sitting and are building a new platform in its place. The scene shows ongoing work, with noticeable construction activity and smoke, indicating a significant change to the area. In connection to the incident, the killer was present there, and there was a video taken from this location that captures the moment. The video shows a killer running behind in the background, providing visual confirmation of the pursuit or escape at that moment. The speaker notes that they were standing right here when the event happened, emphasizing their proximity to the action as it unfolded. They reiterate that this is what is happening at the site at this moment, highlighting the simultaneous construction work and the recounting of the event tied to the video evidence.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Let's see what are they doing because I see a lot of construction, smoke going on. Oh, no. They are constructing they are taking out the whole platform where he was sitting, and they are constructing a new one as you could see. So that's what the change is. And guess what? The killer was there at there, and there was a video taken from here. And that's where you see a killer running behind in the background. And I was, like, right here when it happened. So this is what is happening right now.

@ProjectConstitu - Project Constitution

🚨RECEIPT'S 1: https://t.co/XGi5IRsiMy

@ProjectConstitu - Project Constitution

RECEIPT'S 2: https://t.co/Iqpd5EWqdh

@ProjectConstitu - Project Constitution

@VoxExVeritas thanks so much.

@ProjectConstitu - Project Constitution

@NikkiRosier4 no i haven't thanks

@ProjectConstitu - Project Constitution

not the shooter. we have figured out for sure where the first and second shooters were. the sniper was on the BA building roof and the second shooter was palm gun guy. we have talked extensively on my channel about it. i can say with a high degree of certainly now that all other theories at this point are false

@ProjectConstitu - Project Constitution

@del_jeannie I DO LOVE ME SOME @RealAlexJones

@ProjectConstitu - Project Constitution

@m86742 @1ADefenderhp they can just give it up. we will always undercover whatever they try to hide.

@ProjectConstitu - Project Constitution

@db_wolfe276283 @matjendav4 this is complete mind f**k. this goes all the say to the Utah AG. the top cop in the state.

@ProjectConstitu - Project Constitution

@LeCrieur2015 sadly that is pretty accurate.

@ProjectConstitu - Project Constitution

@goqivana @m86742 @BasedMikeLee that is correct. where the hell is the FBI???

HustleBitch_
Posted - October 21, 2025 at 3:54 AM
Saved - October 21, 2025 at 6:12 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m watching Skyler Baird, the “eyewitness” behind Charlie when the shot rang out. Four interviews claim he was a random bystander, but he moved from the crowd to the front just before the shot. Days later he’s center front at Charlie’s memorial with a media badge, rows from the stage, after saying he probably couldn’t get in. His sparse Facebook—2.4K followers, 7 posts—shows a “digital creator” tag and abundant access. Front row for the assassination, then VIP at the memorial? Placement, not coincidence. Witness or setup?

@HustleBitch_ - HustleBitch

🚨 WATCH THIS CLOSELY. 🚨 THE “EYEWITNESS” FROM CHARLIE KIRK’S ASSASSINATION ENDED UP VIP AT HIS MEMORIAL Meet Skyler Baird, the guy seen right behind Charlie’s head when the shot went off. He gave four VERY STRANGE interviews claiming he was just a random bystander… but the footage doesn’t lie. He started back in the crowd, then somehow moved to the front row moments before the shooting. Days later, he’s on the main floor center at Charlie’s memorial with a MEDIA badge, just rows from the stage after saying he probably couldn’t even get in. His Facebook? 2.4K followers. 7 posts. No content. No history. Just a “digital creator” tag and front-row access everywhere. He was front row for the assassination… then cleared three security checkpoints to sit VIP at the memorial? That’s not coincidence. That’s placement. Was he a witness… or part of the setup?

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 describes Skyler as having given about four different interviews online right after the Charlie Kirk assassination. She notes he is seen with glasses on top of his head, front row at the scene, and somehow sits on the Main Floor at the Charlie Kirk Memorial during the memorial service. She asks, “Who is this guy? How is this possible? And why are his interviews so odd?” She points out that on the day of the shooting Skyler was in the front row and near a bodyguard. Speaker 1 and Speaker 2 recount Skyler’s position: “Maybe 10 or 15 feet away when it happened. Close as he could.” They describe Skyler with sunglasses on his head, and a Charlie Kirk bodyguard in front of him, with Skyler off to the side in the corner when Charlie began taking questions. They note the bodyguard is directly in front of Charlie, Skyler to the side, matching Skyler’s own account of being “front row, Noel in front of him,” with a bodyguard to his left and one in front of him. They say Skyler was “front row and center.” Speaker 0 then says Skyler later appeared sitting on the Main Floor at the Charlie Kirk Memorial, with a floor pass for a press conference, literally “maybe 10 or so rows from the front of the stage.” They claim this is documented on Skyler’s Facebook page. They mention Skyler’s Facebook shows two, perhaps “two point, I think, k” followings, with from 2018 to 02/2025 only about seven posts and about 10 pictures, implying a sparse content profile for a “digital creator.” Speaker 3 describes Skyler’s earlier claim about getting into the stadium: “Just made it to the stadium. There is an unlimited amount of security, Secret service, military, police, empty. Steel barricades all around. … There’s been people waiting in line since 05:30 in the morning.” He says Skyler went past multiple security layers to obtain a media badge and a floor pass, and then ended up on the Main Floor “a few rows back to the Charlie Kirk Memorial.” The speakers question how he could gain access and yet appear to be late, then have a media pass and seating positions. Speaker 4 adds, “So, again, why go into detail acting as if you were late, you didn’t even know you were gonna get in, yet somehow you end up with a passing all these checkpoints to get a media pass around your deck, end up on the First, you know, Main Floor just a few rows back to the Charlie Kirk Memorial that day. It’s just like it’s a big act, a big show that this guy's putting on. It’s like he was handpicked to do all these interviews. He was handpicked to have front row that day because he was up, you know, farther up in the crowd before Charlie got there.” Speaker 4 closes with a segment featuring a clip of another person describing a mythic, imagery-laden interpretation: “An indecision night. I photoshopped in my mind. I photoshopped the blood away. I photoshopped Charlie, sat him back up, put his smile back on, and rewound the tape… I rewound the bullet going back up into the rifle. I stuck a flower inside the rifle.”
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Okay. The Skyler guy gave about four different interviews online right after the Charlie Kirk assassination. Oddly enough, he is also seen right there with the glasses, right behind Charlie's head. The day that he was shot, he was front row to witness it. And then in all of his media interviews, he never once says he's press or anyone of importance, yet somehow he is able to sit on the Main Floor at the Charlie Kirk Memorial. Who is this guy? How is this possible? And why are his interviews so odd? And wait until you see where he was at the beginning of the day and then how he has moved to the front row. Very odd. Speaker 1: Watch the video for, like, 10. Speaker 2: It's like Speaker 3: Maybe 10 or 15 feet away when it happened. Speaker 2: Close as he could. Speaker 1: To my left is security. In the front of me is a security guard and then nothing else. Just Charlie Speaker 2: Baird says. Speaker 0: Okay. If you notice here, Skyler is the air is pointing it, and he's got those sunglasses kinda on top of his head, and then you're gonna see Charlie's bodyguard right there. So you see how they're kinda up against the wall? This was taken before it all started. This was around noon. So he's kinda up in the crowd, and the bodyguard is up in the crowd, which I find very odd because he's, like, behind the gate up into the crowd. And what you're gonna see next is it'll be the live footage of someone recording it, and this is around, like I said, noon, I believe. There they are. The bodyguard's kinda looking back towards him, and that's Skyler right there with the glasses on his head. Now do you see how far back they are kind of in the audience? Now you're actually gonna see where Skyler and the bodyguard move to a completely different area once Charlie gets there and the questions get started. So there is the bodyguard directly in front of Charlie, and then Skyler is over to the side with those sunglasses on his head directly off to the side corner of Charlie. So and that's exactly how he described it in that interview where he was and how he was positioned, how he said he was front row, Noel was in front of him. He had a bodyguard to the left of him and one in front of him. And so that is Skyler right there, front row and center. So this guy got front row seats. He's done all these interviews. And then I go and I find his Facebook and find out that at the memorial service, he was sitting on the Main Floor and had a floor pass press conference and was sitting literally, like, maybe 10 or so rows Speaker 3: Ruins that. Speaker 0: From the front of the stage. Speaker 2: He's since found some clarity. Speaker 1: Story was that Charlie Kirk was murdered for his political views. Speaker 2: And as everyone contemplates what's next Speaker 1: there's a cancer growing in our society. Speaker 2: He hopes for reflection Speaker 3: because there's a real cancer in our society and it's not just But Speaker 2: I know you were talking about the excitement there and focusing on the positives. So how do you wanna make sure that that he's remembered? Speaker 0: Okay. Now here he is sitting on the Main Floor at the Charlie Kirk Memorial, and I'm gonna get to that in a second because it's on his Facebook. But when we get to his Facebook page, something I really noticed was he's got two point, I think, k followings. So you think he'd have, like, a lot of stuff on his page that is interesting because, I mean, I'm gonna follow something, someone if their page has got, you know, all this awesome content on it and I wanna go back and, you know, view it all. He literally, from 2018 to to 02/2025, has maybe seven posts and like 10 pictures. This is his page, his Facebook page. I followed it so I could, you know, following it so I could view everything as if I'm following him. No reels, no nothing. He's a digital creator for what? This is all he has. That's 02/1978 post. But listen to him here. Speaker 3: Just made it to the stadium. There is an unlimited amount of security, Secret service, military, police, empty. Steel barricades all around. Yeah. They're definitely protecting this place. The all signs point to us not being able to get in, but the stadium's already overflown. The overflow's already overflown, and this is an hour before start time. There's been people waiting in line since 05:30 in the morning. Speaker 0: Okay. Notice how he said, and I don't know if I'm gonna be able to get in because people have been waiting out here forever. Okay. But then he gets a floor pass and gets to sit literally a few rows back on the Main Floor with a Did you hear pass that says media? How? Who is this guy? Speaker 3: I went past the first layer, letting him know that I was here for media. Went past the second layer. And the third layer required me to have a badge, and then we took it down to the floor. So that became requisite of me to get a badge. Speaker 4: So, Speaker 0: again, why go into detail acting as if you were late, you didn't even know you were gonna get in, yet somehow you end up with a passing all these checkpoints to get a media pass around your deck, end up on the First, you know, Main Floor just a few rows back to the Charlie Kirk Memorial that day. It's just like it's like it's a big act, a big show that this guy's putting on. It's like he was handpicked to do all these interviews. He was handpicked to have front row that day because he was up, you know, farther up in the crowd before Charlie got there. And then lo and behold, he's literally front row right there to see when Charlie, you know, was shot. Who is this guy? It's like he was planted in. Everything about this guy just screams or he flags me. Something is off. Who is he and who is he tied to? And seriously, go watch his videos. They are bizarre. Speaker 4: An indecision night. I I photoshopped in my mind. I photoshopped the blood away. I photoshopped Charlie, sat him back up, put his smile back on, and re rewound the tape in my mind. I rewound the bullet going back up into the rifle. I I was being transported up into this where the rifle was, and I I stuck a flower inside the rifle. I rewound the tape more in my mind's eye and the shooter. He goes down the stairs. I'm rewinding him. I'm I'm push
MarioNawfal
Posted - October 22, 2025 at 9:11 AM
Saved - October 27, 2025 at 10:55 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I follow Huang’s view: Beijing overplayed its hand, coercive power breeds global distrust. Rare earths dominate leverage but could backfire on China’s industries and global supply chains. The trade war exposed deep cracks—debt, inefficiency, shrinking productivity—while military buildup signals desperation, not dominance. A Taiwan move risks economic collapse and regime legitimacy. Democracy’s self-correcting edge is a real advantage in resilience and innovation, as multipolarity rises.

@MarioNawfal - Mario Nawfal

🚨🇨🇳 PROF. YASHENG HUANG: “CHINA OVERPLAYED ITS HAND” He was born in China, raised inside the Communist Party system, and now teaches at MIT after graduating from Harvard. Few understand Beijing’s power structure like Professor Yasheng Huang. In this exclusive, @YashengHuang breaks down what’s really happening behind China’s global image. •⁠ ⁠Why Beijing’s rare earth restrictions could backfire on its own industries •⁠ ⁠How the trade war exposed deep cracks in China’s economy •⁠ ⁠Why its military buildup signals desperation, not dominance •⁠ ⁠His warning that a Taiwan invasion would trigger economic collapse •⁠ ⁠And why the idea that “autocracy equals success” is one of the biggest lies of the century Huang says the world isn’t watching China’s unstoppable rise, it’s watching its slow decline. 00:48 – Meet Yasheng Huang: Born into a CCP family, Harvard-trained, and now at MIT 02:00 – A Clash of Systems: the struggle between 2 political economies: state-led capitalism vs. open-market democracy 03:10 – Rare Earths as a Weapon: China’s dominance in rare earth refining (≈90%) becomes a tool of strategic leverage 04:40 – U.S. Dependence & Global Shockwaves: Rare earths in phones, cars, and missiles 06:05 – Tech Becomes the Battlefield: From chip bans to tariffs, both sides weaponize technology 08:44 – The Xi–Trump Trade Gambit: China wields rare earths ahead of the summit as a bargaining chip. 10:00 – Did Beijing Overplay Its Hand? Huang argues yes - coercive strength often breeds global distrust 12:00 – The New Resource Race: Japan, Australia, and the U.S. rush to secure alternative rare earth supplies 14:00 – Short-Term Dominance, Strategic Weakness: China can shock the system now, but decoupling will hurt it more later 17:00 – Hard vs. Soft Assets: Why China’s dominance in infrastructure doesn’t equal innovation power 18:10 – Innovation Wars: China’s imitation-driven model versus America’s innovation advantage 21:00 – 3 Critical Years Ahead: innovation, resilience, and diplomacy will determine the decade 23:15 – China’s Economy Under the Microscope: beneath it lies debt, inefficiency, and shrinking productivity 25:30 – The Illusion of Prosperity: Ghost cities, unproductive infrastructure, and overinvestment 28:00 – Misread by the West: Investors still treat China like a high-growth miracle 35:00 – Militarization of the Economy: Civilian industries repurposed for defense 38:45 – Taiwan and the logic of deterrence - “They want to win without fighting” 41:00 – The Invasion Dilemma: Any move on Taiwan risks economic collapse and regime legitimacy 44:00 – Nationalism & Public Opinion: Propaganda builds unity, but enthusiasm for real war low 46:30 – Inside the CCP: The shrinking circle of advisers. “No one tells the emperor he’s wrong” 49:00 – The End of Debate: Technocrats are replaced by loyalists 55:00 – America’s Advantage: Democratic systems self-correct - “a feature autocracies can’t replicate” 58:00 – The Next Decade: Multipolarity emerges; both superpowers constrained by internal limits 59:30 – Closing Thoughts: Peace requires strength - and restraint

Video Transcript AI Summary
In this conversation, the host and professor Yasheng Huang discuss the evolving US-China trade tensions, China’s rare earth move, and potential implications for Taiwan, the global economy, and geopolitics. Huang explains the context, prioritizing how these developments might unfold over the next few years. The discussion opens with the claim that markets react to talk of a US-China trade war and that the world watches China-Taiwan dynamics. The host emphasizes China’s rare earth export restrictions as a powerful lever, noting China refines about 90% of the world’s rare earths, mines about 70%, and holds about 70% of reserves. He posits that this tool could influence global tech, AI, missiles, and defense hardware. Huang clarifies that the official rationale frames it as an export control requiring those who use Chinese rare earth processing to submit applications, with civilian uses supposedly allowed and defense-related uses scrutinized or prohibited. He notes that the line between civilian and defense uses is not clear, and that rare earths are integral to everyday devices (phones, computers) as well as military tech, making the proposed restrictions potentially disruptive to both civilian and defense sectors worldwide. The timeline of US-China tensions is reviewed. The host recaps US fentanyl tariffs on China around 10%, followed by broad tariffs in May, a Geneva 90-day truce, and later a stop on five-nanometer chip exports to China in May. August saw some relaxation of restrictions on seven-nanometer chips, with a cap on revenue from certain Chinese sales. Huang adds a mid-September development: the US imposed docking fees on Chinese ships in US ports, and China announced a rare earth export control, which Huang believes was possibly timed to influence a potential Xi Jinping-Trump summit in South Korea. He argues this rare earth move is unlikely to be narrowly targeted at the US and suggests it may be a bargaining chip—though he thinks China may have overplayed its hand. The conversation then explores China’s broader strategic position. The host notes China appears to be resisting Trump’s tariff strategy more than other countries, which have reached deals with Trump. Huang agrees and adds that China’s rare earth move could accelerate other countries’ efforts to develop processing capacity for rare earths, reducing China’s longer-term leverage. He compares the situation to Apple diversifying suppliers after China’s zero-Covid policies but stresses that diversification takes time and may not solve immediate supply concerns. He also contrasts hard assets (gold, Bitcoin) and soft assets (dollar-based financial leverage), arguing that the rare earth move could spur decoupling in the long term but immediate effects are constrained. The dialogue addresses China’s economy and productivity. The host mentions warnings of overhyped China growth and questions about weak productivity and debt. Huang distinguishes between productivity at the economy-wide level and company-level views; he notes productivity in the US is boosted by efficient enterprises but China’s total factor productivity has been negative overall due to waste and inefficiencies. He explains that overbuilding, such as empty housing, contributes to high debt levels because efficiency gains are offset by waste, leading to a higher capital requirement for each unit of output. He emphasizes that academic analyses consider both visible and hidden inefficiencies, while executives may focus on visible indicators like factories and infrastructure. On military capacity and strategic threats, the host raises concerns about China’s potential to overwhelm US naval capacity with large numbers of ships and China’s drone capabilities in modern warfare. Huang cautions that a full-scale invasion of Taiwan would mark “the end of the day” for the Chinese economy due to a shift to wartime production, reduced exports, and high debt. He suggests the current structure of the Chinese economy relies heavily on exports and consumer activity, which wartime mobilization would disrupt. Turning to governance models, the host asks about democracy versus autocracy. Huang distinguishes ideal democracy from implementation, arguing US systems exhibit autocratic features (gerrymandering, electoral college) and noting the US could perform better with a more open democratic framework. He argues that China’s autocracy has not necessarily delivered superior long-term growth; micro-level comparisons show that growth correlates with openness, not autocracy alone. He highlights that China’s economic expansion has been strongest in less tightly controlled regions, while more centralized control has coincided with slower growth. The final topic addresses Trump’s strategy and its impact on global dynamics. Huang contends Trump’s approach has elevated the status of autocratic leaders but that Europe and other nations may seek to balance by establishing closer ties with China, depending on China’s stance on Ukraine. He notes that leaders view Trump as transactional and that other countries tend to engage to safeguard their economic interests. The host and Huang acknowledge that the geopolitical landscape remains fluid, with China’s rare earth policy, US policy shifts, and Taiwan’s status all contributing to a complex, evolving strategic environment.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Markets crash every time there's talk of a trade war between The US and China. Also, the world is waiting to see what happens between China and Taiwan. Will China invade? What will The US do? Well, today, I spoke with professor Yasheng Huang. He was born in China. His father was part of the CCP, and his grandfather was also part of the CCP and is now a professor in The US after graduating from Harvard. And we talk about the real economic situation in China, how a trade war would look like over the next two to three years, and more importantly, whether China will invade Taiwan. Enjoy the conversation. Speaker 1: How are you, professor? Good. How are you? Good. Good. Speaker 0: It's a pleasure to finally meet. Speaker 1: Yeah. Nice meeting you. So, professor, I think in Speaker 0: the media right now, everyone's talking about the wars that are ongoing in Ukraine and Gaza. I think a lot of people are not paying enough attention to at least people outside of Wall Street and crypto. They're not paying too much attention on another war that's brewing and that's a trade war between The US and China. And that seems to continue to escalate to an extent that a few days ago, China did something that many thought would be unthinkable and they kinda applied long arm restrictions to rare earth exports which what that means and I'll let you expand on it, is essentially any company that uses Chinese rare earth, Chinese processed ore mined rare earths would need to seek permission or approval before exporting the products they produce. And taking into consideration China refines 70% of the world's rare earths and no, refines about 90% and mines about 70%, has about 70% of the reserves. It essentially controls the entire industry which is crucial for tech, for AI, and for missiles and private and fighter jets for The US. So it's a very very important mineral that is essentially controlled by China, and China has played or has threatened to play that card a few days ago. I'd love you to expand on that, professor, and what that means for the world and The US. Speaker 1: Yes. The official rationale is that it is not an export control. Oh, sorry. Export ban. It is a form of export control which is that those who use the rare earth process in China are required to submit applications for using the rare earth process in China. That may be a distinction without a difference, but the Ministry of Commerce later on clarified their position. You are absolutely right. If fully implemented, this is going to send shock waves globally because every electronic production uses rare earth and they set the threshold so low that virtually it means that everybody has to submit an application in order to use the Chinese process rare earth. Their explanation is that civilian usages are totally okay, but the defense related usages are going to be scrutinized and probably prohibited. But what is the definition of civilian usage? What is the definition of defense related usage? Speaker 0: It's not very clear. And it's important to note that the missiles that The US is struggling to supply Ukraine, the air defense systems are struggling to supply Israel and is struggling to supply their other allies, even Taiwan's got billions of military equipment that they paid The US for that they haven't received yet. All these require rare earths to be developed, require the magnets that China also manufactures, I think about 90%, 92% of. So what would be the impact on The US military and The US economy and the and the European economy and the rest of the world? But I think that will be mainly targeted on The US, so let's focus on The US. What would happen to The US if China goes ahead and proceeds with those restrictions? Speaker 1: Well, it would amount to a sudden stop in the production of the equipment and the machinery and the devices and the gadgets. But I just want to emphasize this point. Rare earth are used universally in electronic production. It's a little bit like using electricity, and so it's not really a sharp distinction between defense related and civilian usages of the element and and the magnets. The phones that we're using use rare earth. The computers we use use rare earth. So it's going to be really a global huge impact on on the economy, and so it's not a very well targeted strategy. Let me put it that way. Speaker 0: And, yeah, you know, one would try to understand why China did this on because it all started in in February. The US imposed the fentanyl tariffs on on China. It's about 10%. And then later in April, The US imposed tariffs across the world including China, but China got hit really hard, a 145% tariffs. Not long afterwards, a few weeks afterwards, was a Geneva truce for ninety days, essentially a pause on all tariffs and it went back to 30% which is a 1020% for fentanyl and 10% reciprocal tariff. But then so that was in May 12. May 23 US took another step when that's halting the five nanometer chip exports to China. So essentially, the the American leverage, a professor, is the chips, the AI chips that are required for booming industry that the world was racing to dominate. So that was done in May. Then we have in August, so a few months afterwards, The US didn't reverse that position, but essentially relaxed the restrictions, allowed seven nanometer chips to China with further limitations. I think it's a 15 it was from NVIDIA and AMD with 15% of their revenue capped to China, so fifteen one five, and that was it. That was in August. Now president Xi Jinping and president Trump were meant to meet in APAC but and I think it's very very soon, in the next few days or weeks. But what happened is a few days ago, China took a massive step that The US saw as escalatory and that's one we're talking about. First, did I get my my the the the the timeline right? And I would love you to explain why China made that step. What's the strategy behind it? Speaker 1: You got a broad timeline right, but then you missed one event which happened around mid September. The US imposed docking fees on Chinese ships that carry products and dock the ports of The United States. And if you think about the shipping industry, China produces so many ships, and there are so many ships that carry goods around. And and it's not just carry Chinese goods, but but carries goods produced by other countries. And China also came up with a stocking fee on The US ship, but it doesn't have many ships. Right? So is essentially, that response is so asymmetrically in favor of The United States. It's such unbalance between US and and and China. And then they announced this rare earth. I don't think the rare earth response was devised specifically to deal with the docking fees. Because if you look at the Rare Earth documentation, it is incredibly detailed, very long, and and and substantial. So they probably have been doing this for some time, maybe from April when president Trump declared the Liberation Day, but they didn't announce it. And I think I so this is nobody knows, right, because Chinese government decision making is not very transparent. My guess is that several several things. One is that they they are using this as a bargaining chip to prepare for a potential summit meeting between president Xi Jinping and president Donald Trump later this month in South Korea. Yep. In two weeks. Now we're gonna have a debate whether they overplayed that hand. Speaker 0: Do you think they did? Speaker 1: I think they did. I think they did. And and also this export control on rare earth is not targeted specifically against The United States. It is targeted against any user of the Chinese process rare earth. So this is a such a nuclear option of of a response that is not really well tailored, well designed as a bargaining chip because you you don't go after every country when you try to get a deal with The United States. And I think the other reason is probably they see some weaknesses on the part of The US. If you look at what is happening to the agricultural export to China, it it has virtually collapsed. Right? China has not bought any soybeans. There are bankruptcies now in rural America. Farmers are protesting, and, and this is a harvest season. So I I think they they they are pursuing this high pressure, tactic, before the summit, and I do believe they overplay their hand. Speaker 0: I agree. I think it I'll tell you what it reminds me of. First, I wanna say China seems to be the only country fighting against Trump in this tariff war that we've seen. All other Trump all other countries, including neighboring countries, have reached a deal with Trump, including India, which initially showed and, I wanna say, resilience, but kinda moved further towards China when they went to the summit, the Shanghai summit, not long after Trump imposed the tariffs against India because they're importing oil from Russia, but we found out a few days ago that now India and The US have signed a deal or signed a deal to gradually reduce exports to 50% imports of fifth to 50% from Russia, oil imports. So it seems that China is the only country that's really fighting against The US and that's the second biggest economy in the world. Now I do agree with you. They do seem that they've overplayed their hand, and and it reminds me of The US overplaying their hand over the last few years when it comes to the US dollar dominance and the dominance in the financial systems through SWIFT. And we've seen after what especially after what happened in Russia Ukraine after the war and what how they sanctioned Russia and any countries that does business with Russia and blocked Russia from the SWIFT system, froze Russian assets, that spooked a lot of countries, and a lot of countries are moving gradually moving away from the US dollar and towards gold. So I feel like what China did now is speed up the self reliance of countries when it comes to rare earths. The US is already investing in their own rare earth industry, and European countries are looking for alternatives. The US doing a deal with Ukraine that involves rare earths, think Greenland rare earth might play a role in what Trump was trying to do with Greenland. They do hold a lot of rare earth reserves. So that's the the downside, long term downside or repercussions of what China could face from this from this move. Speaker 1: Well, so I think there are some differences between the sort of financial sanctions imposed by The US after the Ukraine war in in this particular case. They are, you know, not perfect alternatives to the to the reserve currency, to the to the dollar assets. Right? Now crypto, gold. Nevertheless, they are readily available. Right? So you can go to them. So in that sense, The US leverage in terms of this financial leverage is not as strong as the Chinese leverage in rare earth. You can you can so I I do believe you used the term long term correctly. In the long term, yes, this move by China is going to motivate other countries to create their processing capacity. Rare earth, first of all, are not that rare, but it is the processing that is rare, that is concentrated. Right? So other countries are going to be motivated to create their processing facilities and capacity. Japan is also innovating products that can be substitutes for rare earth that may take take a while, but that's not going to help The United States in the immediate short run. Inflation is rising in this country. The trade with China is incredibly important. Christmas season is approaching. Whatever you can do on the rare earth front today is not going to help you to solve that problem. Right? So so in that sense, China does have a substantial bargaining leverage vis a vis The United States in the short run. The way I think about this is is analogous to what happened to Apple production in 2022. When China imposed zero COVID controls, that sent shock waves to companies such as Apple, to Foxconn. They view China as a very reliable manufacturing site of their phones, of their iPods and iPods, But that event shook their confidence and they began to move some of their production to Vietnam, to India. But that's going to take time. Right? So I I think the more analogous situation is that situation, which happened in 2022 when Apple began to diversify its sourcing strategy. But that's going to take time. It's not going to solve the problem. Speaker 0: Very good point. Speaker 1: Yeah. That's a very good point. Speaker 0: I think the point you've made where for countries to move away from the US dollar, there's alternatives available immediately, gold, Bitcoin being two examples. But for countries to move off Chinese reliance on rare earths, not the the mining, but the the the separation of the the rare earths, the the refining, that's a very dirty task that no other country wanted to do, even though The US was leading it in the seventies and eighties. Speaker 1: I I think this is a difference fundamental difference between hard assets and soft assets. Right? So The US advantage in The value of the dollar, the credibility of the financial system, federal reserve, these are substantial advantages. There's I am not questioning that, but these are sort of soft assets. And, you know, gold is is hard, but it's really mainly used not for its own value. It's really used as a storage of value. So it's in essence, it's more like a currency, more like a asset. Vis a vis hard assets. Right? Hard assets take time to establish. But I think I would argue that overplaying your hand is not going to be a wise move down the road. I think if there was any debate before this move whether or not other countries should invest in processing capacity, processing capability, that debate is finished. There's now consensus that that we should we should we should do that. Right? So, I mean, in the long run, that is going to reduce the the Chinese bargaining power, Chinese leverage. And then, also, it's not good it's not really good for Chinese economy as well because they have established this formidable capacity, and they are making a lot of money out of it. It's a very important part of their export production. So sometimes you really have to think hard about, you know, getting some short term tactical advantage, which requires you to calibrate your response and doing something really, really drastic. You may win in the short run, but you may lose in the long run. Speaker 0: Yeah. Like, so for example, The US blocked the export of certain chips to China, but then the the argument that NVIDIA made, they're like, China will out innovate us and they will no longer rely on us. We've given away an advantage, a long term advantage of us supplying those chips to China. So it's kinda similar position here, if China stops supplying of rare earth, refined rare earth to and the magnets to the Western world, then the Western world will become self sufficient and manufacture or refine its own minerals. Speaker 1: But Mario, let let me respond to that specific issue I a little bit think time horizon is very important in this discussion. It is not terribly useful to say, okay, China is going to develop their own chips. It it really matters whether or not they can develop their own chips next year, the year after, or in five or ten years. From a from a national security perspective, it matters tremendously whether that development is to happen instantaneously or it is going to happen over a long stretch of time. I have no doubt given what we know about Chinese engineering capability, technical capability, and the government support, China will be able to replace some of their chips now produced by NVIDIA, maybe TSMC. But from a geopolitical point of view, you will rather have China spend money on creating or recreating their chip capacity, then have them spend time and efforts and money on training their algorithm and building their weapons. Right? So given that's the choice, I'm not sure Jason Huang's explanation is is Speaker 0: It's a valid point. Speaker 1: Is sensible. Right? So you if you want to postpone the war, it matters tremendously if you can do that for three years as opposed to doing that only for one year. So I I think that's the way I think about this this this issue. You know, in three years, anything can happen. Right? Leadership change, Chinese economy, and all of that. Speaker 0: Chinese leadership change? No. You mean a US new US president. Do you Speaker 1: Well, that that's Speaker 0: how see a world where Speaker 1: Let let me put the the priorities of the leadership may change. Right? So I do believe that the Chinese economy is in is is in is is not in the best shape. For some extent, the national security objectives of the country are not serving its economic needs well, and the economic pressures are rising rather than declining, if there are going to be another three years of economic stagnation and problems, that may moderate their geopolitical priorities. Speaker 0: So talking about the Chinese economy, I've been I remember since 2000 early two thousands, everyone was talking about the China Chinese economy overheating is gonna crash, it's a lot of the numbers coming out of China are fake. But, yeah, then we continue seeing the Chinese economy grow year after year, and I think the growth now is about 5%. And then you get those videos coming out of China, the capacity, the technological advancements, you know, they used to be criticized for IP theft and now they're the leaders when it comes to international intellectual property in many sectors. Robotics, they've had they've leapfrogged the rest of the world when it comes to robotics. How are you sure the Chinese economy is weak? We understand there's a 20% youth unemployment. I know you wanna jump in. There's a a a a the household the property sector is not doing too well. Household wealth has gone down. Household spending's gone down. But somehow the economy still hums along pretty strongly. Speaker 1: Yeah. So let's separate the two issues. One is the economic economic growth, economic development, and the others are technology of of deal with them separately and and and try to integrate the the discussion. So going back to the the first point you made, which is that there were people in the early two thousands who predicted the collapse of the Chinese economy. They were proven totally wrong. Right? So as we know now, this is the year 2025 and Chinese economy is has not collapsed. But I think we can keep two ideas in our head. One is that those who predicted the economic collapse in the early two thousands were incorrect, and I would argue grossly incorrect, and also their analysis was incredibly flawed. We can keep that idea and then entertain the idea that Chinese economy today is is experiencing some substantial strains. I'm I'm not gonna use word like collapse, but but I think the appropriate word is economic strains, distresses. I'm willing to use those term. One huge difference between then and now is the debt level. So the Chinese debt to GDP ratio, in in the early two thousand, it was almost there was very low level. For in the nineteen eighties, nineteen nineties, and the first decade of the tooth of the twenty first century, the debt level relative to GDP stayed flat. Beginning in 02/2008, that curve moved sharply upward. And so when we think about stress, we typically associate stress with financial burdens, financial cost of squeezing capital in order to produce one percentage point of the GDP growth. In terms of that ratio, the cap what is known as incremental capital to output ratio, the amount of capital you need to generate one percentage point of the GDP today is, you know, five to seven times as compared with the early two thousands. Right? So the economy is becoming less less efficient from a capital perspective. We can come back to the technology later on. But that's actually what matters in terms of economic economic sustainable economic growth. If you look at the productivity numbers of the Chinese economy, they are all trending downward. When those people who predicted collapse in 2000 in early two thousand, they didn't look at the productivity numbers. They didn't look at the debt numbers. The productivity performance was very strong. Very, very strong. Speaker 0: How's how's productivity going down now? Like, the Ford CEO just a few days ago said he went to see the dark factories in China, he said, it's the most humbling thing I've ever seen. They have fast superior in vehicle technology. I see those videos. How's productivity shrinking? Yeah. That's fascinating. Speaker 1: This is a classic distinction between kind of how should I put it? The executive business view of Chinese economy and the academic view of of this issue. So I'm academic, so I'm gonna say my the academic view is more correct than the executive view. When the executives are looking at those factories, robots and automation, those factories are very very efficient. But they are they they cannot know what they didn't see. See, this is this is the problem with that kind of perspective. When they go to China, they go to see certain things. Right? They go to certain cities. They go to certain factories, and then they formulate their view on the basis of what they see. They don't formulate their view on the basis of what they don't see by definition. Right? So, essentially, this is Speaker 0: What are what are those things, professor? Like, what are some of the things you think they're not seeing? Speaker 1: Oh, what they don't see is there are a whole bunch of enterprises that are wasting capital, that are producing goods that nobody wants in the economy, that they're just sitting in the warehouses that don't that don't go anywhere. What they don't see is The US in The US economy so so so many of these people go to China and they say, wow. Look at the highway. Look at the airports. Look at the the high speed railways. And then they say, look at The United States. Look at the terrible airports. Look at the terrible highway. Okay. So let me tell you something. Logistical cost as a share of The US GDP is about 7%. The logistical cost as a share of the Chinese GDP is about 14%, double The US US US cost. Speaker 0: But how does it how does that that's weird because it doesn't add up to what we're seeing. Because you do see those videos. I've been to China about ten years ago. I'm sure it's changed a lot. And when you go there, it's always a step ahead of the rest of the world. That was ten years ago when I used to go for business. How is how does how do how do you get get Speaker 1: So, Mario Mario, but but I I think it's really important to drill this point rather rather clearly. You you formulate your views on the things that you see. You don't formulate your views on the things you don't see by definition this method. Yeah. Whereas we academics use data that incorporate the things that you see, but we also incorporate the things you don't see. In the end, efficiency and productivity is a is a is a it's not a rose concept. It's a net concept. Economy wide productivity is calculated as efficiency of the things that you see, right, executives see. And the inefficiencies of the things you don't see. So so it's a net concept. The the the issue is that which one in any economy you you have that. So when we Yeah. Report productivity of The US economy, it includes the incredible productive enterprises, you know, great enterprises that we have, technology, and all of that. It also includes really some lousy enterprises and lousy services that we get from restaurants and all of that. But the issue here is that the efficiency gains are bigger than the inefficiency losses. That we say this economy is net positive in terms of productivity. Systematic academic analysis shows that Chinese, is known as the economy wide productivity, total factor productivity is negative. Okay? So the inefficiency losses are bigger than the efficiency gains. So so the aggregate effect is negative. So I'm not denying that the impressive devices, impressive infrastructures that they have built. I'm not denying that at all. All I'm saying is that there are lot of waste in the economy, and those waste waste overwhelm these efficiency gains. Speaker 0: Okay. That that helps that helps me reconcile the two points. And I do remember, know, there are things we do end up seeing even though they try to hide them. I remember a long time ago, were all these buildings that you saw China booming in. There are all these buildings, like cities that were just completely empty. Do remember that? Nobody lives those towns, those cities. Yeah. Is that still happening? Speaker 1: So by definition, it is happening because they have overbuilt. And and the the houses, the apartments use lot of materials, steel, aluminum, bricks, ceramics, and all of that. That industry has been built to today, so you have this huge capacity that has been built. But then you have the output, which is houses that are not occupied. Right? And and this explains why the debt level is so high because usually when you have a very efficient economy, you can use less capital to generate more output. But now because efficiency is so low, you need to use more and more capital Speaker 0: Yeah. Speaker 1: To generate the same output. Right? So so so this is a a kind of analytical between business types and people like me, you know, and academic because we look at we look at the economy as a whole rather than just looking at a few factories or few airports. Speaker 0: Or or some TikTok videos that people scroll through saying, holy shit. Look what China has. And they don't understand is that what cost at what cost and what are the things that you don't see on those TikTok videos. What Speaker 1: what do Speaker 0: you make Speaker 1: That's absolutely Speaker 0: of the there's another metric that scares me, professor, is for every warship that The US produces, I'm sure you've seen that China can produce not one, not two, not five, not 10, not a 100, but 300 warships. I had to fact check that number cause I thought it was impossible. There is no way this is possible. You've got the same level of capacity and leapfrogs happening in the renewable energy sector. How about those two specific points? How concerning do you find those? Speaker 1: Well, I'm concerned from a national security point of view. Right? And I think that in the last years, China is moving very rapidly toward a wartime economy rather than a economy economy. Right? The way I define economy economy is an economy that generates employment, income gains to the 1.3, 1,400,000,000 Chinese people. The work wartime economy, the Soviet Union had some of that. Right? So it's tanks, nuclear weapons. Soviet Union is an extreme case of it. I'm not saying China today is like Soviet Union, but China has been moving in the direction of the Soviet Union in that sense. The war the warships, they they are good for fighting wars. I I can't think of another use of the warships. We can we can argue US is building too many too many weapons. You know? US may not build that many ships, but US is building building, you know, aircraft carriers and and planes. Of fighter jets. Speaker 0: No. A lot of fighter jets. Yeah. Speaker 1: And the defense budget is, you know, what, $500,000,000,000 a year? Speaker 0: So Yes. That's Speaker 1: I I think we can level that criticism against both China and The United States. Speaker 0: Yeah. Yeah. There's also, China's got a massive advantage when it comes to drones, drone manufacturing, and that's shown how important it is with the war in Ukraine and, to an extent, the war in Iran as well. Why do you think China is doing all this? We understand that the ambitions of having Taiwan being under one country, being part of China, and the timelines being set between 2027 and 2049, a lot of people pointing to 2027. What's your stance on a potential conflict in Taiwan, and and how big of a role is that playing on China's more and more military focused economy? Speaker 1: So so this is related to our earlier discussion, right, about chips vis a vis using so developing chips, developing capability to produce advanced chips vis a vis using currently advanced chips to build to build weaponry and to train algorithms and for war fighting purposes. My my I'll get to your question quickly, but I I do want to say that the national security concern is a very legitimate concern. And I think The US policy, the policy of other countries should think about this issue very, very seriously. And the way I think about this is that a peace is war delayed. You delay the war. And and and I think the imperative to delay the war on Taiwan, for example, is is is a paramount. And so we should think about the export control policy from that perspective. In terms of Speaker 0: It's good it's a it's a good status quo to maintain. Like, China's done incredibly well under the status quo of China and Taiwan being ambiguously two separate nations. The US is The US is US, and Taiwan's did done incredibly well. Japan and all neighboring countries have done relatively well. So, yeah, it is a good status quo to have. Speaker 1: Status quo has been fantastic for China, for Taiwan, for US, for Japan. Right? So I I I hold whatever leader responsible who is going to change that status quo. And I'm saying this about the Chinese leadership, but I'm also saying this about Taiwanese leadership. I'm worried about the Taiwanese leadership. I think they are now more explicit about getting, you know, formal recognition of their independence. I mean, they have de facto independence. They don't have a de jure independence. But under that de facto independence, they have grown into a, you know, a rich economy. TSMC is a powerful company. Foxconn is a powerful company. There are people, the Taiwanese people have a much higher living standard as compared with people in Mainland China. They have a vibrant democracy. Right? So the the the diplomatic recognition has been totally irrelevant to the welfare of the Taiwanese people, and I'm worried about the current Taiwanese leader who is edging closer and closer toward a formal, declaration or position on independence. I'm also worried about some of the rhetoric coming from some US politicians sort of nudging or encouraging them to move toward independence. But I'm also worried about China. Right? So the the the the reunification schedule. One of the things that Deng Xiaoping said many years ago, which I thought was a very very clever formula. He said, you know, our generation is not smart enough to solve this problem. Let's just delay it and and and let the future generation deal with this problem. I I think for China, the imperative is still to develop the economy to maintain GDP growth, to improve the living standard of the Chinese people rather than occupy additional land. I I just don't really see any rational reason for doing that. Speaker 0: There is there is the so Russia has sorry. Not Russia. China has two big weaknesses when it comes to and and I'd love you to elaborate on them as the expert, but from what I see, has two weaknesses when it comes to import imports in general, especially when it comes to oil. It's relying on cheap Russian oil and not sure how that relationship is gonna look like because China and Russia have historically been rivals if once a peace deal is reached in Ukraine, and there's the Malacca Straits at which the majority of Chinese imports go through and that's between it's between Indonesia and what two countries is the Malacca Straits between? Speaker 1: Malaysia. Right. Speaker 0: Malaysia and Indonesia. And essentially, the so these are both US allies. And then you've got the the the island wall that The US has formed militarily around China. So essentially, if China does invade Taiwan, it will struggle immensely from an imports perspective or especially when it comes to oil, But, also, some would argue it requires Taiwan to be able to break that deadlock because their whole navy will not be able to exit the South China Sea without having some sort of pathway, some sort of straits out of that area, and that's currently controlled by The US and US allies. Speaker 1: Yeah. So I'm not a military expert. I I don't really know the the kind of the war war tactics very well. All I'm saying is that the day that China is going to invade Taiwan, that's the end of the the day of Chinese economy. Right? In part because of the weaknesses you described, also in part that the whole economy is going to be a wartime economy, and that is not the engine of the growth for for Chinese economy. Right? Chinese economy is very dependent on exports. Chinese economy is very dependent on, you know, consumers and and in China. Wartime economy is is totally it's it's almost a different type of economy as compared with what Chinese economy is today. And it's such a high level of debt. Right? So that that that that is going to be the end of the Chinese economy. Speaker 0: There's something else, professor, I've been thinking a lot about recently, especially when we're that polarization in The US, especially after the Charlie Kirk assassination. I've been looking at democracies and they do seem I love democracies. I've lived in one in Australia, but they do have weaknesses. They do have flaws. One of them is systemic flaws. They're being exploited in different ways. And another one is to say seem very inefficient. Now what China's done as an authoritarian nation is that they've managed to focus on the long term horizon, not worry about the press, not worry about opposition that don't have any opposition. And, you know, I've been raised to believe this is not the right way to govern, but it's worked for them. Now I'm trying to to to understand if this is a right way to govern and democracy which is relatively new might have flaws and authoritarianism might be advantageous in some ways. So I would love to get your thoughts on it and what you think of the Chinese model because there's not many other nations, large nations, that have achieved that level of success through that level, through that way of governing. Speaker 1: Well, so there is a there is a I I think what you said is is I agree with some of it. I think that it's important to make a distinction between democracy as ideally constructed and democracy that is currently being implemented. And, you know, I'm not as familiar with Australia, but I'm recently familiar with The United States. I think there's no question that The United States has a very flawed political system. But if we look at this issue deeply, it is flawed precisely in those areas where The US system is most autocratic. Look at the dysfunctions of the US government. Where the dysfunctions are? The senate, right, the gerrymandering. Is gerrymandering democratic in in any sort of a reasonable description of a democracy? Right? Gerrymandering is designed to shape the electoral district so that to reduce the power of certain electorate. The senate has 100 senators. Each state has two senators, whether you are California or whether you are Wyoming. Is electoral college democratic? Electoral college is deeply antidemocratic. It gives seven times more voting power to people who live in Wyoming as compared with people who live in California. The simple I mean, this is not the only definition, but the simple definition of democracy is that kind of majority voice, majority votes should be more important in certain domains than the minority voices and minority views. The US political system does not even satisfy that requirement. I I actually think that if US system is more democratic oh, look at the gun control. Look at the gun control. Systematically, The US political system is designed against gun control even though they are more death from gun violence than they are from traffic accidents. You know? Something like forty thousand people every year in The United States die from gun violence. But for years and years, for decades and decades, they cannot fix that problem. Healthcare. For years and years, US cannot solve that problem because of the opposition from a very small number of the politicians. Speaker 0: Ah, so you're saying interesting. So you're saying a centralization of power, example lobbying groups, example the flawed voting system in The US. Those are the weaknesses of a democracy, not the democracy within itself. But I'll ask you this question, the the following You Speaker 1: actually failed democracy. Right? So if you can buy the policy through money rather than through the ballot box, I I would debate anyone who argues this is a democracy. This is not democracy. This is oligarchy. Speaker 0: But it's an incredible democracy if you compare to China, though. Speaker 1: Oh, that's that's absolutely true. Right? In in a in a sense of the elections, in the sense of of of a free press and and freedom of the of the speech. Speaker 0: Doesn't doesn't China doesn't China show show that authoritainers authoritarian governments could actually function and do well, at least in the short term? In the long term, it's a different question. Speaker 1: Not at all. So first of all, let me just make a methodological point. We should think about China, we should think about US, and think about Australia not as, sort of compare with each other. We should really compare them themselves against themselves. Right? So I think The US can do much better if US has a has a has a has a slightly different system, more democratic system. Let me put it that way. They can reduce the gun death. They can build more infrastructure if the system is designed better. For China so I I'm gonna have a new book coming out in January 2026. If you look at you're correct to say that Chinese autocracy is very good at growing GDP. But within the last forty years, there's a huge difference in terms of household income growth, personal income. So you receive a salary. I receive a salary from from my employer, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. As a as a regular citizen, you know, as a as a scholar, I care about GDP. As a regular citizen, you don't really care about GDP. You care about your personal paycheck. It turns out that the personal income growth in China of Chinese people, I'm not talking about Chinese government, Chinese people, was highest when Chinese political system was more open. And that was in the nineteen eighties, was more open. So it was not a democracy for sure, but we sometimes we lump all these things in the same category, autocracy. There are some more open autocracies. There are some more close autocracies. Right? If you look at East Asia, Taiwan was autocracy. South Korea was autocracy. Their economy grew fantastically in the nineteen fifties and nineteen sixties and nineteen seventies. Well, but North Korea was also autocracy. China under Mao was also autocracy. They didn't grow at all as compared with Taiwan and South Korea. It is precisely because under Deng Xiaoping, China became less autocratic. It was still autocratic system, but it became less autocratic. And then they began to grow. Right? So the correlation is actually between the political system becoming more open and less autocratic and good economic growth. If you look at the Chinese regions, it is especially those regions that were less controlled by the central government that began to grow strongly. Those regions in China that are under strong tight controls of the central government, they have performed poorly in the last forty years relative to those regions that are less under, less controlled by the central government. So I think the totality of the evidence does not support the idea that autocracy is the reason why China has grown so quickly. Speaker 0: Well, that's good to hear. It it's like, for example, under under president Xi Jinping, it obviously became more autocratic. The term limits have been removed, president for life. Yet you're saying GDP grew as a whole the country grew, but domestic household net worth has not grown as much and is still lagging because autocracy is not as effective as a democracy. Speaker 1: So if you look at the Chinese leaders since 1949, and I ask you to name two leaders that are most autocratic, you'll probably name Mao, right, for short, and Xi Jinping. K? So Mao didn't grow the Chinese economy. China remained very poor in 1976 when he died. Under Xi Jinping, the economy slowed down substantially, you know, from, you know, 8%, 9% to now officially speaking, 5%. Their alternative estimates, let's say What are they? The well, the alternative estimate put it between 1.53%. Okay? Oh, wow. So this is a this is a Speaker 0: That's more than The US. Speaker 1: This is a huge and and at a fraction of the per capita GDP as The US. For for per capita GDP, the Chinese is about, you know, 25% of The US per capita GDP. Aggregate GDP is bigger, but China has a bigger population. So at a fraction of The US per capita GDP, if you're growing at, you know, 1.5%, to me, that's a failure. Okay? So so now I ask you, right, the the following question, you know, is the most autocratic leader in China most successfully economically speaking? The answer to that is clearly no. Mao is the most autocratic. Under his leadership, Chinese economy didn't grow. Xi Jinping compared with Deng Xiaoping, compared with previous leaders you know, I'm not saying Xi Jinping is the same as Mao Zedong, but compared with Deng Xiaoping, compared with the previous leaders, he's more autocratic, and yet Chinese economy slowed down. Right? The correlation is exactly the opposite from the one that we often hear, which is that autocracy delivers the robust economic growth for China. That's just absolutely not true. Speaker 0: Interesting. Well, again, that's really, really reassuring to hear. The last topic I wanna ask you about, professor, is just, Trump as a whole and his strategy when it comes to China. When it comes to the world, I feel like he's been very aggressive, including to allies, yet he's reached a deal with all those countries, and they all know that, you know, the political system in The US, the president's only there for four to eight years. Trump only has three more years, so a lot of them have kowtow to Trump's demands and and reached some sort of agreement. Many saw Trump's strategy as alienating allies, and China was initially trying to take advantage of that position, trying to build relations, better relations with Europe, try to take America's position as the stable player in the global economy. But it seems that it's changed now with China's rare earth moves. Would love to Speaker 1: get your thoughts on Trump's strategy and how China's responding as a whole. I think the Trump administration has elevated the prestige, legitimacy, and the status of autocratic leaders such as Putin, such as Xi Jinping, Orban, and people like that. So there's a legitimacy boost to the autocracy because of the Trump administration. So in terms of ideological balance of power, it has shifted in favor of autocracy, and we're gonna see that for the next three years as well. But in terms of the real kind of economic balance of power, geopolitical balance of power, that depends on what China does and depends on what these other countries do. In terms of the sort of geopolitical balancing or economic balancing, I think it would it would be a very easy not a very easy, but it will be relatively easy thing for China and Europe to move closer to each other because both of them shared some degree of distrust of the Trump administration. The blocking obstacle of that is the Chinese position on Ukraine. Right? And and the the rare earth definitely does not advance that that relationship. But previous to that, it was the Chinese position on Ukraine. If China revises its position on Ukraine, you know, not necessarily going all the way against Russia, but at least moving toward a more neutral position, and China can Yes. Intermediate between Ukraine and Russia given China's power or not power, but given China's influence over over Russia. I think Europe will be eager to move closer to China. Right? I think That's a good point. I really my worry is about Europe. Europe is caught between Trump's America and China and with the Ukraine on their front door and they don't really think about either The US or China as a reliable partner, I think I think that is not a very good position for them to be in. Speaker 0: But at least they know that in The US, there'll be a new president that could change the his strategy when it comes to European relations, where in China, in three years, he'll probably continue being president Xi Jinping. Speaker 1: Yeah. So I I But before add let me add one point on this. Please. I think other leaders, including Indian leaders, understand Trump better than the Chinese leaders, which is that Trump is a transactional president. And you want to do transactions with him to safeguard the larger economic interest of your country. What Trump wants is a showmanship. Right? So he enjoys people kissing his ring and these democratically elected leaders, and I believe that they are doing the right thing to kiss his ring because their ultimate responsibility is employment in their own countries, is economic growth in their own countries rather than confronting president Trump. Your the landscape did exactly the right thing. You know? He kicked his ring. Right? So Yeah. I I I He's now wearing he's Speaker 0: now wearing a suit. Speaker 1: That's actually the kind of the political fiduciary responsibility of these leaders, and I gave them very hard remarks even though I really don't enjoy saying that. Speaker 0: Professor, it's been an incredible conversation. I appreciate you spending the time with us to explain the the trade war that we're seeing, the whole talk about rare earth restrictions by China, what that could lead to, and more importantly, the general geopolitical situation between the two powerhouses, The US and China. It was a great discussion. Thank you. Speaker 1: Yeah. I enjoyed talking Speaker 0: to Speaker 1: you, Mario.

@MarioNawfal - Mario Nawfal

🚨🇵🇸 EXCLUSIVE: TRAPPED TEENAGER SPEAKS FROM GAZA He is 17 years old and has spent two years trapped inside Gaza, living through airstrikes, hunger, and constant fear. In this exclusive, @ReachYuzuf shares what life looks like when survival becomes routine. •⁠ ⁠Nights filled with explosions and days without electricity •⁠ ⁠Families lining up for hours for a single loaf of bread •⁠ ⁠Evacuation papers costing thousands with no guarantee of escape •⁠ ⁠Schools destroyed, dreams on hold, and an entire generation growing up in ruins When asked what he wants most, Yusuf said it quietly but clearly. “I just want to finish school and live a normal life.” 00:00 – Intro: Speaking with a 16-year-old Yusuf trapped in Gaza 00:45 – Returning home after 4 months of evacuation 02:33 – Born in Dubai, stuck in Gaza since 2021 05:14 – October 7th: “I woke up to war” 06:45 – The first bombings and the family’s fear 09:05 – Life without basics: electricity, food, or clean water 10:52 – Hospitals without anesthesia, desperate medical care - “Breaking a leg could be fatal.” 12:31 – Living without showers, gas, or functioning sewage 14:50 – Religion, humor, and resilience in a war zone - “If I don’t laugh, I’ll go crazy.” 15:33 – Starvation: “Everyone I know has lost weight” 17:10 – Markets empty: “I haven’t seen eggs in months” 19:43 – Cucumbers cost $20 a kilo; inflation and unemployment, rent skyrockets 21:44 – Crypto lifeline: fundraising, 50% fees, survival 24:05 – Who keeps order? Hamas, neighbors, and chaos 26:32 – Ceasefire brings safer zones, aid trucks return 28:44 – Waiting for borders to reopen, keeping hope alive 29:06 – Rebuilding Gaza: rubble, aid, exhaustion and life after war 35:00 – Supporting Yusuf's projects: crypto, aid links, and donations 36:50 – Is the war really over? “Not until Rafah opens and peace returns” 37:24 – Final reflections: a young voice of courage within ruins

Video Transcript AI Summary
The transcript is a long, candid interview with a 16-year-old Palestinian boy who was born in the United Arab Emirates, lived in Gaza, and has been stuck there since the war began. He shares his daily life under war and a subsequent ceasefire, offering a firsthand look at how people survive when basic services are scarce. Key background - The speaker was born and raised in the UAE, moved to Gaza in 2021 for financial reasons, and his father remains in the UAE while his mother and siblings are with him in Gaza. They have tried to leave Gaza since day one of the war in October 2023 but have not succeeded after two years. - He emphasizes his family’s current safety improved after the ceasefire, noting that “the safe zone has expanded” and that he’s back in his house, though life remains difficult. Life during and after the ceasefire - Since the ceasefire started, there is a sense of tentative normalcy: “the saves zone has expanded,” more trucks and goods are entering stores, and he is back at home. - People are hopeful about the ceasefire, even if only “1%” of hope remains, as many are clinging to any sign of improvement. - The boy describes ongoing exhaustion from two years of war, noting that he wants to return to school, finish high school, and consider university, possibly in America or the UAE, with planned studies in marketing or business. Living conditions and daily necessities - Power relies on solar panels; he charges his phone at a neighbor’s solar setup. - Food and water are precarious. Most markets have scarce, expensive, or poor-quality items; there is a lack of basic foods such as eggs, chicken, and various meats for months. Prices fluctuate sharply; for example, a kilogram of cucumber is now much more expensive than in the UAE (around $5, compared to under $2 before the war). Rent for a two-room apartment is about $500 per month, a high sum in Gaza, and some people paid much more at the onset of the war. - He explains how money gets into Gaza: crypto is used, with a fundraiser in GoFundMe-style format, and a fundraiser manager sends money via crypto to cash exchanges. A notable fee (historically up to about 50%, later down to around 20-20%) is charged to convert crypto to cash. - Electricity is limited; there are some generators in some areas, but many rely on solar power. Water is obtained from wells and the nearby sea; early in the war, he filled up water jugs daily, but the situation has somewhat improved. - Sewage and bathrooms in tents are degraded; tents involve improvised setups with holes and improvised plumbing, especially when rain hits. There is no functioning sewage system in many tents. - Hospitals and medical care: anesthesia exists in some hospitals, but transport to outside Gaza for urgent care can be necessary; ambulances exist but depend on fuel and access. If a person is seriously injured without timely transport, outcomes can be dire. - Education and daily life: schools are destroyed or unusable; studying under siege is extremely challenging. The speaker notes that most people in Gaza face unemployment (the claimed unemployment rate being 99-100%), with many living on aid or in tents. Security and societal dynamics - Security during the war was weak; there were incidents of car theft and people evading identification by removing license plates. After the ceasefire, Hamas has reasserted some police and security roles in the area. - The speaker mentions that his cousin died because he could not access medical treatment promptly during the war. - The boy has used fundraising and humanitarian partnerships (Human Concern International) to distribute aid and sponsor orphans, with daily food distributions continuing through the ceasefire. Social and personal aspects - He notes that many people would leave Gaza if they could find a stable job abroad, while others remain due to lack of options or safety concerns. His own family’s situation remains precarious but currently safer than during peak hostilities. - He continues to document life in Gaza, balancing a resilient, hopeful outlook with the harsh realities around him. He envisions education and a future career, possibly in marketing, and expresses gratitude for the support he has received while acknowledging the ongoing hardship of daily life in a war-torn region.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I just spoke to a 16 year old boy born in Dubai, but now stuck in Gaza since the war. 16. And we've talked about his everyday life, what it's like living in a war zone, what Gaza is like today compared to before the war, and what happened post ceasefire. It's a pretty heartbreaking conversation. The connection was not great, so I apologize for that. The Internet is not great there. I hope you enjoy it. Speaker 1: Hey. How are doing? I'm doing good, man. How are you? Speaker 0: Good. Good. You're at your neighbor's your neighbor's place now or your place? Speaker 1: I'm back to my place. We were evacuated for, like, four months, but now I'm back. Speaker 0: How does it feel? Because I know I was watching your videos earlier and you were you had to evacuate twice from your house as a last minute thing. You had to go to a tent. Are you back home now that the ceasefire started? Back to a bit of normality? Speaker 1: Yeah. Thank god. Yeah. Since the ceasefire started, I'll be back to my house now because the saves all expanded. Speaker 0: Are people hopeful about the ceasefire? Speaker 1: I mean, yeah. People are holding on to anything basically. Even if it's 1%, people are holding on to anything and I am as well. Speaker 0: Because I saw the news today that the fighting started in Rafa. You saw that? Speaker 1: Yeah, saw that. I saw that. I hope it's nothing bigger than that. I hope it just gets solved quickly. I think it will. I don't think it'll be something bigger than that. Well, I hope it isn't. Speaker 0: How are you feeling? Because I've been watching you and you've it seems that it's it's taking a toll on you. Obviously, it's been taking a toll on you for a long time. It's been two years of war, but Yeah. I just feel like that energy you had early on is is starting to fade and you started doing less videos. Are you doing okay? Speaker 1: Oh, yeah. I'm doing well, but it's just you know, it gets pretty pretty exhausting, you know, surviving with everything that's going on. Like, sometimes I just wanna I just wanna be back in school, you know, and do my homework. But now I'm just documenting my life in this chaos, which can be really exhausting, like, no matter it's been happening for two years. Right? It'll get exhausting eventually, and it has. Speaker 0: What's heartbreaking is your story as well. I think you were born or you lived in Dubai before going where I am now. You lived here in this city before you went to Gaza and got stuck in a war. Can you tell the audience for anyone that doesn't know your story? Speaker 1: Yeah. So my story is I'm Palestinian. I was born and raised in The United Arab Emirates. And then in 2021, we moved to Gaza for financial reason and for financial reasons. There's a lot of reasons that went into it, but we had to move to Gaza in 2021. That was, like, the only option that we had. My dad is still in The UAE, though. And then we were gonna stay in Raza for, like, two years, and then the war happened in 2023. And, yeah, we were stuck. We tried to leave Raza since day one of the war. Since day one like, from October, started to try to leave, and it's been two years and we haven't left yet. Speaker 0: Tell people about Gaza because everyone sees Gaza as a war torn region now, and they see the death and destruction. What I think a lot of people struggle to do is to relate to Gaza and the Palestinians there. They go to the gym like we all do. You guys go on the internet, watch the same YouTube videos we all watch, listen to the same music, eat in restaurants with friends like we do. How was Gaza before? I know you didn't have the freedom that other countries do, in terms of having an airport, having a lot of blockade, but just tell us about what the region was as a culture, as life there. Speaker 1: I mean, it's it was pretty good. Like, it's you have everything that you need. I mean, it depends on your on the working class you are on. Because the minimum wage is, like, a $100 here, like, before the war. Like, a $100 per month. So depending I mean, every person was how do I say this? Every person was content. They were happy with what they had no matter how little or how much that they have. There we we were grateful for it. Right? And from Gaza as a culture, it was like like any Middle East. I wanna say any Middle East. It's more like any Lebanon country. We love olive oil. We we have our own dance, which is the, like, like, national dance. We have our national dresses. And I don't really know what to say. There there's a lot. Speaker 0: And then October 7 happened. Tell us about the day. Maybe first, where were you when that day happened? What was the feeling the the first emotion that you got? And just fully for the audience, you're 16 now I think and you were 14, 15 when the war started or October 7 started. Speaker 1: Yeah. I was 14 on October 7. Speaker 0: Because people look at you now, they think that that I'm talking to a 25 year old adult, but you're you're a kid with all respect. They've had to go through all this. How was it for for a kid? Remember, it's a very high percentage of children in in in Gaza, which is heartbreaking considering the casualties of the war. But tell me more about that day. Speaker 1: October 7, I woke up at, like, four and a half AM, and I woke up so early because I had a history test, like, the other day. So I was, like, preparing for it. I was studying for it. And while studying, I was studying for, like, two hours. After studying, I wanted to go to the gym. When I once I finished studying, I saw I went on the news and saw what happened. My friend told like, called me and told me what happened, and I was in shock. Because I knew whenever that happened, it's it's gonna end bad. Like, like, what happened? I I okay. Okay. But, like, I knew it was gonna end bad after I saw what happened. And I wanted to leave us ever since that day. I didn't go to the gym after studying because my gym closed at that day. They were it was risky to go, especially on the first few days. You it was something new. It wasn't like any other war before October 7. That day was it was sad. It was depressing. I was the start of all of this, and I could I would have never imagined that I would be going for what I'm going for right now since that day. Like, from that day, I would have never imagined that. If I was gonna leave Azer, which after many attempts, couldn't. Hopefully, again, once the borders do open, I'll I will leave. But, yeah, it's been two years and I haven't left yet. How's the lighting, by the way? I know it's it's kinda Speaker 0: You look at the door fine, man. Man, you look fine, I think. I think you have all exceptions for a guest that no other guest will have to solve the circumstances. So what about when the bombing started? Because I I remember that day I was covering it live and everyone was waiting on whether Israel will actually invade or not. Everyone thought most likely they will invade and then to what extent. When the bombing first started, was very heavy bombardment. It was insane scenes to see because we would get the footage from outside Gaza and it was just light and light and light and boom boom. It was heartbreaking to see. And I don't know that that continued for two years is is even crazier. But the the intensity of the first few days and weeks, especially first few days, Speaker 1: was something For the first, like, two months, I was like, I remember. I remember. What do you remember? In I think November unlike the first few weeks of the war, I remember me and my family decided to sleep in, like, the middle of our house just in case, like, a bomb happened or something did, like, hit the side of our house. We wouldn't be affected because we would be in the middle. Right? And I remember I remember I would like, the doors would shake, some windows shattered. It was it was tough the first few first few months. Speaker 0: A lot of people wonder these small things right now, like charging your phone, getting Internet, getting food, getting water. I know a month ago you ran out of water. What's life like now? What are the things how do you get food? What do you eat? Just give us an idea of all the necessities that people like me take for granted. How do you be able to sustain yourself? Speaker 1: Okay. So about, like, charging your phone, it's my solar panels. For example, my neighbor has solar panels. I just charge my phone at his place, obviously, for money. Food, you either get it by, like, eight or or go to the market. And the stuff that's being sold, it could be commercial depending if the borders are open, and it could be just aid being sold by people who, like, get aid. They do sell it. What else? Studying, you can you can basically not you can't study in Raza. It's it's tough. There's no schools. All the schools are destroyed. So yeah. What else? Speaker 0: What about the hospitals? What about if a woman woman wants to give birth? What if you get the flu? Not the flu, but you get some sort of condition that you need to go see a hospital, some emergency or, you know, you break your leg? Speaker 1: It depends. Most hospitals will have anesthesia. Well so that's that's a pretty bad one already. And if you get injured, for example, you might have to be transported to a country outside of Azerah to get to get treated. So if you do get pregnant I mean, I think it's people are getting pregnant before hospitals existed, so I think that's that's that's not too bad. It is horrible. There's no it is. It's harder. Yeah. Far out. Speaker 0: Far out. I injured myself just a few months ago and I was talking to my partner and I said like just imagine the days you know whatever a hundred years ago whatever it was where humans didn't have anesthesia. It's like it's like I'm like I wouldn't want to even live in that world and yet now we're in 2025 and people in Gaza don't even have anesthesia. You know, for me this doesn't like this is our it just hurts like to know that's anesthesia anesthesia cannot be used to make bombs. Anesthesia is to treat the wounded. It's sad and how many how many hospitals there if you wanna go to hospital right now, something happened to you, you broke your leg, what would you do? Speaker 1: There's a hospital, like, fifteen minutes away from me, like, walking distance. Let's say if you're, like, far away from the hospital, you need to find a car. So, I mean, finding a car or, like, a taxi is pretty tough. Sometimes there was no fuel for the cars because there were, like, no cars running. So, like, if you do get injured and it's a very time sensitive injury and you can't get to the hospital in time because you you don't have a proper vehicle, that that could happen to you because of the because, like, of the vehicle. So Speaker 0: Is there and that's a silly question, but there's no ambulances, is there? Speaker 1: No. There are ambulances. There are there are. Okay. And how how There there's fuel from them. Yeah. Speaker 0: Okay. And how active are they? Speaker 1: How active are they? I mean, they're they're pretty active. Speaker 0: If you call an ambulance, Fajid, would you get it in the next hour in about an hour? And I think it depends on the circumstances as well. Speaker 1: Yeah. Of course. It it it deeply depends on like what happened. If a bomb happens, of course, they'll they'll they'll rush there. But if you have like it really depends honestly. Speaker 0: Another question is that what about other necessities like going having a shower? I know you've run out of water a month ago. How long did you run out of water for? How was that like going to the bathroom, eating, getting the food? You didn't answer that one earlier. How do you get the food, and and how do you cook the food? There's is there gas for the ovens? Speaker 1: There's no gas for the ovens. We cook by firewood. We burn up wood. I cook on top of it. For water, is like we have an ocean. I mean, we have the Mediterranean okay. How do you say it? We have a sea beside us, so we can get water from it. Like, if you don't wanna shower from, like, the seawater, you can. And Azer is very rich with wells. There's a lot of wells in Raza. Speaker 0: That's nice. Speaker 1: Clean water. So, yeah, it's not too hard. It it can be hard at times. Like, def at the beginning of the war, I had to fill up, like, water gallons so, like, my family can cook so they can shower or they can use the bathroom. I had to, like, fill up two or four water gallons a day at the beginning of the war, even more. But like now, the like, the water situation is a bit better. It's a bit better. Speaker 0: And you're considered one of the fortunate ones because you Yeah. Have people that donate to you. So this is your life. Can you compare this to the average person in Gaza? If we say you're above average considering your success on YouTube, an average person, the people that we see in those videos starving and trying to get scrapes off of what's left over from the aid, can you tell us about their life? Speaker 1: Their life is pretty hard. You know, they don't have a job. I I think, like, that an unemployment rate is 99%, if not a 100. Like, jobs on the ground, you can't have an all I mean, an only job could work. Okay. I don't wanna get too much off topic. But an average person is probably jobless. They're probably living in a tent because their house is destroyed. They live off aid aid, like, charities that come, like, come over to the tent camps and give aid. Their life is very different than mine. Like, for me, I put like, I don't benefit from aid. There are people, like, less fortunate than me that deserve it more. So, like, me, if like, I have like, I'm very like, I have enough money for myself, for my me and my family, so I can buy food whenever. I don't have to wait for a, like, a charity to give me an aid box. So I'm very blessed in that fact, and I'm very blessed money to like, with money, money wise, and most people aren't. Most people have to wait until the next aid distribution happens. And depending on where you are, they may happen every day or they may happen once a week or maybe once a month. Maybe some people I know people that haven't got one single aid box at all because charities may, like, may have not been able to reach them or there's a million other reasons why. So my life is very different. Speaker 0: A lot of talk of starvation in Gaza and there's a lot of videos to show that as well. Can you talk about that situation when you go walking on the street? How's the hunger like? Speaker 1: I mean, pretty much everyone has lost weight. I lost weight. My entire family lost weight. Everyone I everyone I know has lost weight. So, you know, people aren't eating yet. But ever since this feast fire happened, aid has been there's more there's an influx of aid, which is good. But before that happened, people were not eating well. They weren't eating the best. And if you did have food, you didn't have if you did have money to buy food, there's nothing to buy, basically. Like, you have money, but there's nothing there's nothing to buy, and that's something I ran into. Speaker 0: What type of food was there in the market? Give us examples. What what are things that you never see in the market, Lester, that we we would consider normal? Eggs, chicken, meat, fish. Speaker 1: I haven't seen eggs in months. Haven't seen an egg in months. I haven't let me think. Chicken. Haven't seen chicken in months. Lots of meats, haven't seen in months. Salmon, fish. I mean, you could the people that do fish do get, like, seafood, and sometimes they do sell it, but, like, salmon's I haven't seen salmon's in months. Like, basic stuff, like, like, before, I always used to eat eggs every day. Like, now I don't even I can't even find one singular egg. Speaker 0: What are the prices like? First, how do you get your protein? You know, you know, you need protein to sustain yourself, sustain your muscles. How how do you get your protein source? Speaker 1: I mean, I won't even say my my muscle, like, I'm sustaining any muscles. Like, I was in the gym before the war. I've lost, like, pretty much all my muscles. But how do I get my protein? It could be from cheese. There is cheese. There is I forgot the protein source. Like, the main protein sources are chicken, eggs, meat, and I don't have any of that. You could say milk and cheese and but these are, like, very minimal. Not the best not not ranked highest on the protein source. Speaker 0: What are what are the prices like? And two questions. What are the prices like? Also, how do you get money? Speaker 1: How do I okay. So the prices are very they're fluctuating. They're not the best. They're but, like let me think. What what should I use as a reference? Speaker 0: Let's use what's something that we could both let's use maybe cucumber if that's something that's readily available. Do you get a lot of vegetables? Speaker 1: Yeah. Okay. Yeah. Okay. Yeah. We well, like, thank god there's like, that's that's fertile, like, vegetable wise. Mhmm. But wait. How much does a kilogram of cucumber cost in The UAE? Speaker 0: Checking I'm checking right now how much it costs. Let's do in in in in The US where my main audience is. Speaker 1: Okay. Okay. So one five it's between 3 and $5 US. So the highest amount cucumber was, it was around 70 shekels, which is roughly $20. Now it's, like, around 20 shekels, which is just above $5. Before the war, it was, like, not even $2. It was pretty cheap before the war. Speaker 0: That's but so you're at one stage, cucumbers cost four times as much as it costs in The US. Yes. And you're talking about a region that everyone's unemployed. Speaker 1: It's very important. On the end. Yeah. Yeah. What? My brother wants to say hi. Here he is. What's up? What's up, man? It's Mario. Speaker 0: We're play football. We're gonna we play football when you come to Dubai. Tell him we're gonna play football when he comes to Dubai. Speaker 1: How's it going? He wants to play football once he come to Dubai. Kick his ass. He wants to play football with you once you come to Dubai. Not about Speaker 0: Kick I know. You follow football. No. I remember he was stuck on one so he's if the price was the price is four times more. What about rent? Let's use that one as an example. Speaker 1: Rent. Rent is like so my friend, he's in a two room apartment. Yeah. It's just two rooms. Like, two rooms and a bathroom. And he's paying $500 a month for it. Pretty sure that's Gaza. That's a lot. Right? In yeah. In Gaza. Jesus Christ. I'm just seeing how compared to that to other regions. Yeah. And what I had to pay once thousand $500 for, like, an apartment, and I was in need of, like, you know, an apartment and a place to stay. I had, like, little no place to stay, and that was, like, my only option. That's ridiculous. So Yeah. How do you get Speaker 0: money in how do you how does anyone get money into the region? Speaker 1: So there is a lot of ways to do it. What I do personally is using crypto. So I have my own crypto wallet, and I have a like, I have my own fundraiser on Shuff. It's like a GoFundMe page. So I have my own fundraiser. People send me money on the fundraiser, and using that money on the fundraiser, my fundraising manager sends it via crypto to me. And then using crypto, I send it to, like, an exchange center here, an exchange office, and he gives me the money in cash. Speaker 0: Okay. And what does he take a percentage of it as well? Speaker 1: Yep. How much is that? I think it highest the highest percentage was around like 50%, but now it's like 20%. Yes. Speaker 0: So Yousef, did you say 50%? Speaker 1: Yeah. At one point, it was 55% or 50%. Speaker 0: Outrage If I send you a thousand dollars, you only get $500 out of it. Speaker 1: Yeah. That was, like, when the world was worst. Yeah. Speaker 0: And that was, like, one month worth of rent. Imagine. I'll send you a thousand dollar so if I wanna pay your rent right now and you're living in a two bedroom house just for the sake of argument, I'll have to send you a thousand dollars a month just to pay your rent in Gaza in a war torn country with the risk that the building could be destroyed any day. Yep. Or you could be asked to evacuate. Speaker 1: Yep. That's not even costing, like, the money cost or the Internet cost. That's just, like, for the apartment itself. Speaker 0: How about electricity? Speaker 1: There's no electricity. There's only solar panels. With electricity? There are regions that have, like, more, like, generators running, but they're really expensive. Like, my region doesn't have any generators. So I like, the way I charge my phone is using solar panels, and my neighbor has solar panels, as I said before. So I just send my phone to his place, and he charges life more from me for me. Speaker 0: Who another thing I wonder is who keeps security? Because Hamas is obviously busy fighting a war, and at least from the outside, it looks like they're crippled. Maybe I'm wrong. Is this still Hamas maintaining security locally? Is there other groups or is each person for their own? Like, how when you're paying rent, how do you make sure your house is your house? Because there's certain system rule or law and order to make sure that when I'm driving a car, no one comes in, takes my car, and becomes their car. So, you know, there's police there and there's cameras. How does security work in Gaza? Speaker 1: Yeah. So during the war, like, peak war, there wasn't, like, that much security. Everyone was busy, like, evacuating, busy finding food for their family. So, like, peak war, cars were being stolen. They would, like, take off the license plate so no one, like, knows it's their car, like, they stole a car. House wise, I mean, if you are if you do have a house, your neighbors are, like they're gonna know who's, like, gonna go in and go out. Like, when I had to evacuate my place, my neighbors stayed. I don't know why they stayed. It was pretty dangerous at that time. They stayed, and they'd, like, they'd see who would be, like, around the area. So they would be, like, the protectors of that area. So no one steals anything. So it's, like, even in independent security. That's, like, people were. But now, Hamas is operating. Like, they have their, like, own police security system in place. So So if you do have, like, a stolen car, you can just report it to them, basically. Speaker 0: Okay. So they already become active again? And Speaker 1: Yeah. Once the ceasefire yeah. When the when the ceasefire happened, they came back to, like, maintaining everything. Speaker 0: Do you have have you had anyone close to you in your family or close friends that was hit injured by the war or or any casualties? Speaker 1: I know my cousin. He was supposed to evacuate Gaza for medical treatment, but, like, too much time passed, and he died because he couldn't get, like, medical treatment in time. Speaker 0: It's when I speak to people there privately, it's I haven't spoken to one person, Gaza Youssef, that hasn't had a friend or family injured or killed in the war. Yeah. Speaker 1: I mean, yeah, basically, everyone has had, like, somebody close to them get affected by the war, like, with their life, basically. Speaker 0: How have things changed since the ceasefire? Speaker 1: Thing things have became way better. Like, the save zone has expanded. So, like, now my house isn't in the danger zone anymore. I haven't posted about this publicly. I haven't worked on the video yet, so that's why. But, yeah, now I'm back to my house. The safe zone has became bigger, and there are more trucks entering. There's, like, more stuff entering the store, which is good. Obviously, like, whatever's entering is not enough, but there's there is stuff entering, so that's not good to some extent. Speaker 0: How many people have cars? Speaker 1: Not everyone. Some people I know my my dad's friend. No. My dad my friend's dad sold his car so he can pay for his son's evacuation out of Azzur so he could Yeah. Study This was, like, at the beginning at the beginning, like, very beginning. Speaker 0: How much did it cost to evacuate someone back then? Speaker 1: It was, like, around $5,000. Speaker 0: And and you did did you try to evacuate then? Speaker 1: Yeah. I actually failed. Like, for each person, it was around $5,000. I made a fundraiser, like, leave Azer, and we got enough money. And then I paid when I paid to leave, there was, like, a thirty day a thirty day queue, like, month long queue. So I was waiting, like, for the queue to finish. Basically, I was waiting in line. And then Israel entered. Rafa. Rafa has basically, like, the border, like, the city that's bordering Egypt. Yeah. So we're gonna leave, like, through the Egyptian borders, but then that happened. Like, Israel entered that part and the border closed. Speaker 0: Did you get the money back at least? Speaker 1: We're keeping it until the border reopens. If the border, like, reopens and, like, we can leave in that way wait. One sec. Then I'll there's no reason for me to, like, take the money back right now. I'm keeping it until the border reopens, and then now then I can leave, like, in that way normally. Speaker 0: And what else has changed in that? Is there heavy equipment starting to come in and clear the rubble? Speaker 1: I have no idea about that. I think they will like, these they will enter, like, these this type of equipment will enter, like, once the war is, like, completely, like, ended, and they're, like, in the reconstruction phase. Speaker 0: In one of videos, you said people are calling you a trader for that. What percentage of people would you say wanna leave Gaza? Palestinian or not, they just want a normal life. And what percentage of people do you think wanna stay? I'm not saying that the ones that have no choice just but to stay, want to stay versus want to leave. Speaker 1: People who can, like, get a job outside or, like, find something, like, good for them outside, they would've they they would leave. Speaker 0: How much do you weigh now? Speaker 1: I think we're around I haven't checked the I'm around seventy kilograms, but I'm pretty tall. So, like, most of my height is in the bone, not in the muscle or, like, the Speaker 0: How how tall how tall are you? Speaker 1: I'm one eighty six centimeters. Speaker 0: Holy shit. You're taller than me. Speaker 1: How tall are tall. Speaker 0: I'm one eighty three, one eighty four. Speaker 1: Yeah. We're pretty we're the same thing, man. Speaker 0: Yeah. We'll we'll do arm wrestle when you come. I'll give you, like, three months. We're in Dubai. I'll give you three months to catch up in the gym because I've had an unfair advantage, and then we can arm wrestle. Speaker 1: Sure. Speaker 0: So we've talked about we've talked about like not many people have cars, very rare for people to have cars. We've talked about the different foods that you have, water. In terms of bathrooms, I'm sure there's no bathrooms that you can flush anymore is there? I've been camping so I know life when you don't have a normal bathroom but you have normal bathrooms and you have showers because you go to the there's a pond and there's the sea so you may be able to to get water that way. There's different ways to get water. Yeah. But bathrooms is no functioning sewage system at all. Is this completely gone? Speaker 1: Depends on the area. Some, like, sewage like, some sewage systems are, like, completely broken. So, like, depending on the area, you would see, like, sewage just, like, out in the open, like, out on the street. Speaker 0: And have you you've and oh, you've also been to a tent. I remember one of the videos, you had to have Speaker 1: a quick Speaker 0: pass to a tent. That was that was the worst. Tell us about the tent. That was the worst. Especially when it's raining. Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah. I'll tell you about the bathrooms and the and the tent. So how, like, the sewer system works in the bathroom is that there's no sewage like, the tents. There's no sewage there's no sewage system. So you would have a tent, and then you would have a tent for the bathroom, and then you would dig up, like, a big hole. And inside that hole, you would, like you'd have a pipe that connect, like, the bathroom to the hole. Right? And it would cover it would cover up the hole, basically. We put some wood in it, some sand to cover it up to cover it up. And then here you go. You have your own, like, sewage sewage Speaker 0: I know. I know how I've been I've been camping and stuff, I've done a lot of that training when I was younger, and I know how that was disgusting, but then you Speaker 1: get used to it after a while. It's disgusting. But you It's it's Speaker 0: it's horrible. And then how how what happens also when it rains and you're in that tent? Water's on the floor as well, no? Speaker 1: Oh, I remember. Casting through. Yeah. Yeah. I remember the first night it rained, like, when I was in the tent. I was so I got I had, like, a free shower, basically. Speaker 0: Bro, how Speaker 1: do you Speaker 0: how do you how do you still smile? How do you still laugh through this? Speaker 1: How do you get I have no idea, bro. I think I'm crazy. I have no idea, bro. I I I think I'm going crazy, man. Because most people are, like, pretty yeah. Most people are, like, pretty what's it called? Pretty, like, sad and, like, and then, like, you have me who's just, like, full of joy and whimsy about everything. Not about everything, like, that's going on, but, like, I'm just I still have some happiness left. I have no idea why. Played it. Speaker 0: I know religion played a key role in it from what Speaker 1: I used to have in previous videos. Yeah. Speaker 0: And last thing on on that front is what what's your day like now? Let's take us through today. What yes yesterday because today we're talking today or yesterday. From the morning you woke up till in the evening. Speaker 1: So you just wake up depending on what you like, when you wake up, you'd have some breakfast that you bought from, like, the other day. So it would be some cheese or some bread that you either baked or you bought, like, from a bakery. Bakeries have opened up, so that's good. Like, I don't have to bake bread. Like, it's all expensive white flour again. So you have that. So you wake up, eat some food. If you don't have food, go go buy food, or you eat from, like, an eight box to eat that. And then you if you don't have water, you're full of water. I mean, like, living life in a war is pretty boring. There's, like, not much that you can do. It's not like every day is a new adventure because that's that's not true. Like, it's pretty boring. Like, there's nothing much to do. Speaker 0: What's your plan when you get out? Yeah. Speaker 1: When I get out, I wanna get back to school, finish up high school, and then go to university. I'm thinking of going to university in America, but I haven't, like, fully thought about it. I might just do it in The UAE. What do you think? Should I do it in America? University? Speaker 0: US US has the best one of the best education systems in the world for sure. Speaker 1: Mhmm. For sure. What what are Speaker 0: you planning to study? That depends what you wanna study, though. Speaker 1: I'm thinking of marketing, I haven't thought about this so this is what I've kept like thought of so far. I'm thinking marketing or business studies, that's what I have right now in mind. Speaker 0: Then you've got an edge as well because you've built a hell of a brand around yourself, personal brand, a personality online, you've got your own following. And your family will be your dad so the last question I have is is your dad's in Dubai throughout all this but your mom is in Gaza with you? Speaker 1: Yeah. My mom's with me and I have a sister and a brother here. They're all with me and my dad's in in Dubai. Yeah. Speaker 0: He never went to Gaza with you guys when he left? Speaker 1: Not when we left, no, no. Speaker 0: And for anyone that wants to to support you, what is the best way to support you? Speaker 1: So there's gonna be a fundraiser link in the description which is my okay, bro. Oh my god. There's gonna be a link in the well, listen, I'm not I'm the type of guy that doesn't like asking for, like, money, But, like, in that situation, that's Speaker 0: forcing That's Yeah. Lagging. I'm trying to find out. I was gonna ask you if you're okay. No, bro. The you're you're you have a a link in the bio. We're gonna put it there for you. And then people could think you can send crypto on there because I know the link. We can send anyone send crypto to you and you can convert it. And you also don't you have a don't you also help there's there's a link to help others as well. You've created, like, your own your own aid not aid organization, but essentially movement, if you wanna call it that. Speaker 1: Yeah. I wanna put a So with the Human Concern International. Yeah. I work with Human Concern International to distribute aid to people here in Gaza. We sponsor orphans. We give out daily food distributions. We haven't stopped, like, ever since this ceasefire happened. We've been giving out food daily. So if you wanna donate, you can donate in the bio. If you wanna donate to me, you can donate in the in the as well. If you wanna donate crypto to me, you can also donate in the link in the in the comments because this is gonna be on Twitter. Right? Yeah. We'll put Speaker 0: it in the tweet. Speaker 1: We can have everyone's name either. Speaker 0: On Twitter, it will be in the tweet, and then YouTube will be in the link below. And people could just go to your profile and you have it on your profile. Man, in your mind, is the war over? Yeah. Yeah. Speaker 1: I think it's gonna be over once outside of of Haslam. Because for me, like like, right now, it's it's not over. Like, obviously, the risk of getting, like of being dad is, like, lesser, but I think, like, this will entirely end that I will truly feel at peace on some day way. Speaker 0: Man, I last thing I wanna say is I've been I've watched your videos. When I first stumbled upon you, I started watching your videos and I went back, and I started seeing how you've evolved throughout this entire period. First, like, no child should have to mature as quickly as you have. It's like life not even life. The worst life imaginable a human should imagine living hit you like a brick wall all in an instant. Mhmm. And I've seen you evolve. The hope is still there, at least that's my observation. Mhmm. You've posted less videos now. You just seem exhausted today, man. You just seem emotionally drained out. Hopefully soon, bro, we'll be here behind me. We'll be sitting down doing interview face to face because you're gonna have a hell of a story to tell when you get out of this shit, man. I think you found a way you found a way to keep posting videos through this bullshit, you found a way to somehow get internet, make a video, edit the video, put the thumbnail, still have a smile on your face when posting the video, still have a better attitude than most people living a posh life in The UK or The US or Europe or wherever else and you've been doing it for two years consistently. So I think that it's obvious you're at the finish line whether the finish line is a few days from now, a few weeks from now, a few months from now at least and as you said in your latest video when you look back at this it would have made you the man you are which is gonna be a hell of a man so so much respect for what you built bro. Again, behind me there we're gonna find a restaurant there and we're gonna sit down and do an interview again. Speaker 1: Okay. I can't wait a lot. So excited. Alright bro, keep your head high man.

@MarioNawfal - Mario Nawfal

🚨🇺🇸 ALL CHARLIE KIRK THEORIES: WHAT’S TRUE AND WHAT’S TOTAL FICTION Heard the rumors about Charlie Kirk’s assassination? Exploding mic. Mossad hit. Second shooter. Trans terror cell. Hidden trap doors. @StephenGardnerX has covered this story from the start. In this exclusive, https://t.co/6MNh2XIGDC

Video Transcript AI Summary
Steven (interviewer) and Charlie Kirk’s discussion covers the Charlie Kirk shooting at the Utah Valley University campus, the evidence, theories, and ongoing investigations. The key points are: - Two narratives around the incident: many are angry about the Gaza-Israel war, while others note Charlie Kirk was irritated about defending Israel more than America and about a Jewish donor pulling money; this discrepancy led some to speculate about Israeli involvement, though no definitive link is presented in their discussion. - The microphone/explosion theory and the “exploding mic” explanation are challenged. The mic is deemed too small to cause the observed effects, there is no residue, and the shirt’s cavitation can account for the shirt puffing without an explosion. They discuss the lack of burns or tears and conclude the exploding-mic theory does not fit the evidence they examined. - On the terrain and line of sight: a walkthrough of the scene revealed the Losey Building is two or three stories tall, with Charlie Kirk in a lower amphitheater area; the shooter, Tyler Robinson, fired from above, shooting downward. The terrain and proximity were difficult to gauge from Google Maps, and being physically present changed their understanding of distances and angles. The shooter’s position, sightlines, and the potential visibility of the shooter’s face or gun from the roof were clarified through on-site observation. - Handprint and measurement observations: a handprint believed to be from Tyler Robinson was found on the roof edge, accompanied by a measurement tape suggesting a length around 36 to 40 inches, consistent with the length of a rifle. A yellow tape measure taped to the building and later footage from a telescoping camera supported this assessment. There was discussion about whether the handprint length corresponded to a rifle’s size, and whether a towel on the shooter concealed a weapon. - Video and evidence release: there is an ongoing investigation, and authorities have not released all video or autopsy details. They emphasize the rights of Tyler Robinson to due process; unlike a deceased suspect, Robinson is alive and defense counsel is heavily involved. Investigators have used lasers, measurements, and other techniques at the crime scene, but not all footage is publicly shared during ongoing proceedings. - Autopsy and ballistic questions: debates about wound direction (front versus rear entry), exit wounds, and the possibility that a 30-06 round could be consistent with the neck wound; a front-entry or behind-back trajectory is discussed. Forensic experts describe how X-rays and ballistic analysis will determine the bullet’s path and fragments, while noting that the death certificate does not specify the bullet type, which is a common practice. - Candace Owens and donor-related DM discussions: Candace released DMs in which Charlie Kirk reportedly said, “Jewish donors play into all the stereotypes. I cannot and will not be bullied like this, leaving me no choice but to leave the pro Israel cause.” They discuss whether those messages indicate Israel involvement or donor pressure. Steven argues donors may have wanted Kirk to uphold Judeo-Christian values and that the donor dynamics could explain some tensions, but they do not conclude an Israeli conspiracy. - Discord chats, text messages, and “trans terror cell” theories: they discuss the possibility of Discord chats and messages being forged or taken out of context; some theories mention a transgender cell or coordinated conspiracies. Steven notes Kash Patel announced investigations into conspiracy theories, but as of now no arrests have occurred. The Discord exchanges were described as real in part, but their relevance to planning remains uncertain; there is speculation about premeditation versus reactive admissions. - Other theories and debunkings: theories such as trapdoors, tunnels, or irrigation pipes were addressed and dismissed. Claims about an Egyptian military plane, drones, or a private jet turning off transponders were also discussed and generally debunked or dismissed based on timing, geolocation, and official statements. - Weapon specifics and trajectory: Matt Tardio and Chris Martenson are referenced regarding the ballistics and wound mechanics; Steven suggests the 30-06 wound is plausible if the cartridge quality and angle were favorable, but emphasizes that more autopsy details and bullet analysis are required. He expects more evidence to emerge during the trial, including ballistics, gun residue on the shooter’s clothes and car, and the shooter’s geolocation data. - Trust in institutions: the conversation closes with a note that, regardless of the findings, trust in institutions like the FBI heavily influences how people accept or reject the evidence and conclusions. They acknowledge that even with extensive surveillance footage and forensic analysis, public trust will shape the reception of any official findings. Steven commends the coverage for being thorough and methodical across multiple theories. In summary, the discussion blends现场 observations with ongoing investigative questions: the on-site terrain clarified shooting angles, the handprint and measurement evidence suggested rifle length, and the autopsy/ballistics details remain pending; many alternative theories (explosive mic, trapdoors, drone activity, coordinated conspiracies, or donor-driven motives) are discussed and evaluated against observed evidence, with a general emphasis on awaiting official forensic results and trial proceedings.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Charlie says Jewish donors play into all the stereotypes. I cannot and will not be bullied like this, leaving me no choice but to leave the pro Israel cause. Speaker 1: So I think what happens is you've you've got two stories going on. Right? You've got a lot of people that are angry about the Gaza Israel war, and then you've got people that are saying, wait a minute. We have on record Charlie Kirk being irritated that he's having to defend Israel more than America. Speaker 0: The exploding mic doesn't make sense. You know, the mic is too small. There is no residue. The sound does not align with an exploding mic. Speaker 1: Well, is there any country on planet Earth that covertly blew up a lot of people with a really small device? Oh, it's Israel. Right? Mhmm. The the pagers to Hezbollah, the cell phones to Hezbollah. Right? So I think that story kinda took off. Speaker 0: I know Mossade is extremely capable, but Mossade is not stupid. Speaker 1: I I think it's much more likely that a 30 aught six got jammed in his neck than that he was shot from behind or shot from a trapdoor. So that's more plausible to me than than some of these conspiracies. But we're gonna we're gonna have to wait and see. I do believe that more is going to come out, but I think right now they're holding their cards in order to get a conviction. Speaker 0: I'm just gonna jump straight to it because I think you've done you've been covering it since early on and, went as far as most creators kinda came made all these different assumptions and came up with these theories without actually seeing the place physically. And looking at the place through Google Earth where Charlie Kirk was speaking at the time he was assassinated and trying to explain all these different questions that people have is very different to when you're there in the grounds having a look at those different locations. Can you give us a thoughts on on how that walkthrough went? What were the differences that you saw? Speaker 1: So the I I just completed my second walkthrough, but you're absolutely right, Mario. I I covered this story for almost two weeks based off articles, based on aerial imagery, Google Maps. But once I actually got there, the thing that shocked me the most was the terrain. The Losey Building where we're told Tyler Robinson shot from is two or three stories tall, and Charlie is way down in, a pit of an amphitheater. And so he's definitely shooting down at this angle. So as I got there, I I had only been there for maybe ten minutes, and I figured out how to get onto the roof where the shot came from in about ten seconds. So but until you understand the terrain, if you're just looking down on Google Earth, it looks really flat because they have these, like, big red tiles that are sidewalks, but some of those are also walkways of a roof. And so the way that the the the terrain is was it really threw me off until I went there. How close everything is really surprised me. Like, you think, oh, he's a football field and a half away. But when you're sitting there, you're like, wait a minute. With my own eyes, I could have seen Tyler Robinson. I could have seen his face. I could have seen the barrel of a gun. But all of the focus and energy and hype was down on Charlie Kirk, and, sadly, nobody was looking up. But I I just walked it for a second time. While I was there, I got to see the handprint of Tyler Robinson in the dust coming off the roof where he jumps off. There was also a measurement tape there, and you can see what looks like something about 36 to 40 inches long that scrapes that dust on the edge of the building. So until I actually went there, I was relying a lot on articles and Google Maps, and it was totally different in person. Speaker 0: Interesting. So the the length that that that scraped the area where the handprints were, was that the size of the 30 odd six rifle that you had? Speaker 1: It appears to be. Now, when we were there two days ago, I noticed that there was the first time that I went, there was actually a yellow tape measure that had been taped to the building. And I thought, what what is that? I didn't understand it. When I went back the second time and Gray Hughes investigates, he was able to use his telescoping camera. He said, look. Here's the here's the handprints and all of that. And I go, oh my gosh. Yes. They're trying to measure if it's the length of a gun because some people have said, there's no way he has a gun. You can't jump off of a building with a gun. And others have gone frame by frame. And even though it's blurry and pixelated, you can see something very stiff inside of what looks like a a dark gray or a black towel. So I personally believe they were trying to measure, did this guy have a gun from his handprint to where that final scrape was? And it does look to be the length of a of a rifle. Speaker 0: Yeah. So on in the video, for anyone that hasn't seen it, there's a video of Tyler Robinson jumping off the roof. And he had something with him, but it was very pixelated. And it was a towel hiding something. No one knew what it was. Some people said it's too small to be a rifle, but it's also very difficult to make that determination because it was very pixelated. And they haven't released, so some people will be, like, listening to us now, I'll let you elaborate. They'd be like, yeah. Okay. But then if they have the footage showing the rifle or showing Tyler Robinson, you you mentioned a camera that was exactly where Tyler Robinson was taking the shot. So they have the footage most likely. Then people are like, okay. Why aren't they releasing that footage? People don't understand. There is an ongoing investigation, and you don't release the evidence that will be used in the court proceedings while the investigation or the court proceedings, the hearings are ongoing. Do you wanna elaborate on that as well? Speaker 1: Yeah. So, you know, unlike Thomas Matthew Crooks who shot at president Trump, he was killed. This guy is still alive. So under our rights as American citizens, he now has the right to innocent until proven guilty. He has the right to due process. He has the right to a lawyer. He's they're hiring the highest power lawyers in America right now. So I think that they have moved from crime scene to conviction. The other thing that was really interesting that a lot of YouTubers and and creators are missing is it it's really easy to think that TikTok has all truth. Right? Like, okay. He shot somebody at Turning Point USA is taking an SD card. There's a gentleman that sneaks in the crime scene and steals a Charlie Kirk hat. And then next thing you know, they're ripping out the grass and everything goes away. Right? But if you go to local news channels in Utah, KJazz, KUTV, KSL, others, and you just search Charlie Kirk crime scene, there's hundreds of photos. This place was crawling with police, crawling with investigators, people in military fatigue, SWAT team. They're clearing out the the the area. So and and right before I was asked to leave the campus by the police on Wednesday, we asked the guy, hey. Are are you you know, how many days were they here investigating? Three or four? He and he shakes his head and he goes, I'm not allowed to say. Right? So his body language is confirming, yes, they were here for days. We asked him, you know, were they using lasers, measurements, sound device? And he's like, I'm not allowed to say, but he's shaking his head yes. You know? So and I I didn't film the interaction. I respect the police. This guy was very nice. At the end, he said, by the way, I watch your show, I'm glad I didn't offend a a fan. Right? But he gave me a lot of information before we we got kicked out. But, anyway, I hope that answered your question. Speaker 0: It does. It does. Yeah. And I think you've addressed that in your last video as well. I recommend people check it out. Because it haven't I seen the videos you've made before that about Charlie Kirk. I've seen that last one, and I've I've glimpsed a few before that. So the way I assume things went in your mind, and I think most people went through that process, is that you had these questions. You know, some people jump to conclusions before even asking the questions. They start with the conclusion and go back. And we'll go through some of those and and and, kinda discuss them and and maybe fact check a few of them. But what were some of the questions you had early on? Things you did not understood or you maybe you saw a video on YouTube or some expert talking about the the rifle being disassembled or the gunshot wound being an exit wound. What were some of those questions? And after this investigation, these interviews you've done on this, what was your conclusion at the end? Speaker 1: Okay. Great question. So in the beginning, I was just like everyone else. I I was waiting to to hear what would come out from the FBI, news stories, leaks in the media. I was one of the very first people to go live about the Charlie Kirk shooting. I had just come off of an interview with Josh Hammer, who is at the center of all the Candace Owens drama. So I was literally on my podcast with him while Charlie Kirk is being shot. I get off of that. I get a text message from my family saying, Charlie Kirk's been shot in the neck. I think he might be dead. And I'm like, no. His Twitter shows him throwing hats. He's fine. And then all of a sudden, boom, breaking news. And so I decide, okay. I'm gonna go live. During that live, I'm trying not to throw up. You know, I'm watching this footage over and over again, and and I I was just very, very upset. And so I was like, okay. I don't usually cover crime stories. I'm pretty much focused on military, government, Donald Trump, the the country, of America. So I was like, okay. I'm just gonna see what starts to come out. And so I I just started, you know, sharing what was coming out. And then I didn't really know whether I could trust the FBI because of JFK and MLK and RFK and January 6 and, you know, just a lot a Yeah. Lot The Epstein files, where the heck are those? Right? So a lot of these are, like, brewing in the back of my mind, but I'm like, okay. Sadly, our family has been through a murder trial. And so I just had to keep reminding myself that regardless of whether you believe the FBI or you don't believe them, a murder trial, they are going to go through this with a fine tooth comb. The burden is going to be on proving that Tyler Robinson is guilty, not that he's innocent. They're going to have experts from everything from his cell phone to photos to the the chats to his geolocation. So I know that the FBI is not going to be able to get away with much because there's a living human that has to go through a murder trial. So for me, I was like, okay. That leads me to just say, okay. I'm going to not fully trust them, but I'm going to try to build out this narrative myself. So as stuff starts to to come out, I just start building ideas of what I think has happened. I start eliminating in my mind the conspiracy stuff that I think is not true, but gets lots of clicks on YouTube. I didn't wanna go that route. And and so then I just started building piece by piece what I thought had had happened. And then that's when I was like, okay. I don't fully understand autopsies, medical examiners, a death certificate. I'm going to get an investigator on. So I I talked to an investigator. I'm going to get a forensic expert on. I'm going to get an autopsy expert. I'm going to get a mortician. And I was trying to understand, like, how does someone get shot in the neck with a 30 aught six supersonic high power rifle and it doesn't blast through the back of them? But at the same time, my own eyes were like, okay. I've sadly watched Charlie Kirk die probably 50 times. There's no mist. There's no blood splatter. There's no hole through the banner behind him. And then Candace Owens comes out and says, I was able to watch the video. There's no blood. There's no bullet hole. And I go, okay. That confirms what I believed that he wasn't shot from behind. Then that week, every video going viral is him being shot from behind. I was able to debunk most of those pretty quickly based on location, based on that data I shared, and talking with Turning Point USA. Then I started just looking at different aspects of the crime. Okay. Are there any other areas where you could have shot Charlie Kirk from? Pretty much determined it was just that location. What kind of what kind of gun could it be? Is it the guy, you know, tugging at his shirt and it's a palm gun? No. It's too loud. It's too much force from the front. Is there a a wound from behind? Is this a exit wound or an entrance wound? And and then I started reaching out to those experts. So I I just started eliminating the stuff that sounded cool, but didn't really make a lot Speaker 0: of sense. Mhmm. Yeah. Yeah. What's the talk about v one. There's a lot of people talking about the gunshot being the exit wound and a gunshot from the back. So you were able to verify if this is true or not. How did you do that? What what footage did you look at? Speaker 1: So the the first thing that I did I've gotta remember it all because I've looked at so much footage. But the the first thing that I looked at when I was watching those videos from other creators was that that he he does not put an earpiece on. And so I was like, okay. That eliminates the earpiece. And then it was like, oh, he was shot right behind the ear, but I have video footage from people here in Utah, and there is no bullet hole in the back of his head. The other thing is when you zoom in and you've got these snipers and gun range experts, and I'm sure they're great at what they do. But when you see that thing come out, if you zoom in, there's zero red pixelation in the photo. So I'm like, that can't be blood. And so then I started looking from different angles and I realized, oh, wait a minute. The necklace that Charlie is wearing with a crucifix, that blasts off. And then I was able to find a video where I slowed it down, and then I screen grabbed it, and then I slowed it down again. And you can actually see the chain, And it comes around the back of his neck. Some people are saying that's blood. Some are saying that's an earpiece. Some are saying that's the bullet dummy. It it's his necklace Speaker 0: It is. Speaker 1: Coming around. Right? So that that was the first one on that. The big video that went viral was a gun range expert. He says, oh, he's he's shot from this stairwell. Well, number one, you can't get to the stairwell. It's it's literally fenced off as hard as Gaza. Right? Like, it is fenced in. You cannot get up there. The other thing is I I have lots of video where there's nobody standing there. There's nobody dressed in a grass suit. There's nobody with a sniper. It's really hard to get to that position. The second thing was that position is too far forward. So how do you shoot someone from behind when you're in a forward position? Right? So it it it didn't make sense to do to for that. Then the last thing that I debunked this video that got, like, 8,000,000 views is the guy points to the wrong tent. You see, it's an easy shot for anybody with sniper experience, and he's pointing to the wrong tent. And I'm like, okay. This can't be true. So I threw that out. I didn't do a video. I didn't even do a debunking video. Speaker 0: Oh, you should've. Speaker 1: I just kept with truth. I Speaker 0: should've. Right? Yeah. I I think so as well. And there's people talking about an exploding mic. That's why the shirt kinda flew off and why the the necklace flew off. Now I've interviewed Chris Martinson. I've had Matt Tardew on as well. We've, you know, talked about these different theories. The exploding mic doesn't make sense. You know, the mic is too small. There is no residue. The sound does not align with an exploding mic. So that was one of the theories that was floating around as well. I'm not sure if you've looked into it. There's no burns. The the clothing does not even tear. And the the shirt, you know, a lot of people talk about the shirt that kinda kinda puffs up. Why does that happen? Essentially, it's a cavitation. You know, you've got a high powered rifle, causes cavitation. Chris Martinson talked about that. Causes cavitation. That's pretty common for the shirt to do this. Any other points on these two theories? Speaker 1: Yes. So the the exploding mic, here's what I think happened, is you've got a large group of people that immediately wanted to blame Israel. So I think what happens is you've you've got two stories going on. Right? You've got a lot of people that are angry about the Gaza Israel war, and then you've got people that are saying, wait a minute. We have on record Charlie Kirk being irritated that he's having to defend Israel more than America. We have him, irritated that a Jewish donor pulled out money. So immediately, people are like, oh, this has to be Israel. Well, is there any country on planet Earth that covertly blew up a lot of people with a really small device? Oh, it's Israel. Right? The the pagers to Hezbollah, the cell phones to Hezbollah. Right? So I think that story kinda took off and this desire to blame Israel. But if you look at it, there's no explosion. How does something explode but then go with the momentum of the blast? That doesn't make a lot of sense. How does something go from this collarbone, like, the Adam's apple and then in here and then gets lodged in the t one vertebrae? So for me, that that didn't make a lot of sense. The cavitation makes a lot of sense. When I talked to Andrew Colvet at Turning Point, I'm one of the only people that I think he's done an interview with outside of the Charlie Kirk show. He told me about all of the damage to the neck and where they found the bullet, the fact that there were fragments, and about the cavitation, you know, destroying his heart and all of his neck and all. All of that makes a lot of sense to me. I think Chris Martinson did some really good investigation on that. The one thing, and I've told him this myself, he believes that the the shooter was further to the left on the cafeteria building and that he shot between two trees. But that the roof there is pure white. You would it's on an angle. You would literally he would have had to hang over the roof. I I think the shooter would have been seen. And, also, the audio analysis shows the gun further back. So for me, the cavitation makes sense. The exploding mic and the different shooting location do not. Speaker 0: Yeah. You mentioned about the whole Israel theories. I think people need to understand the the kind of the causation correlation. Like, if I fight with my, let's say, my CEO of the company or or a friend, and then I happen to get shot a few days later, you're making those correlations so quickly is a common thing that happens during instances like this for people to get answers. I think there is I would love to get your thoughts on the DM, though, because Candace I wanna get your thoughts on the theories that Candace has mentioned because she's gone pretty deep in into different rabbit holes, but she has also achieved some pretty interesting investigations. So the DMs that she released. So I'll read it out for anyone in the audience that hasn't seen it. So Charlie Kirk says and also, I think two days before the assassination, he said, just lost another huge Jewish donor. $2,000,000 a year because we won't cancel Tucker. I'm thinking of inviting Candace. And then someone says, like, he's upset about it. And I think they say to him later, please don't invite Candace. Charlie says, Jewish donors play into all the stereotypes. I cannot and will not be bullied like this, leaving me no choice but to leave the pro Israel cause. So a lot of people saw this and kinda tried to link it to Israel. For me, me I pretty quickly dismissed the Israeli theory. Like, I'm like, first, there is people like, if if Charlie's a bit upset with Israel for whatever reason, I think it's you know, anyone that's just got can think for themselves would not blindly follow any cause. You can question president Trump. You can question Israel. You can question the US government. You can question the FBI, unlike we do. But it doesn't mean you turned against someone. If we question the US government or if I'm critical of Trump for the Epstein files, doesn't mean I'm critical of everything Trump does. And it just doesn't make sense for Israel to first assassinate such such a high profile person in The US. They lose all their American support instantly. They lose Trump's support, someone who's allied to president Trump. From a strategic perspective, it makes zero sense. Now, Candace, from what I understand, she hasn't said Israel's behind it. She's gonna release a lot of information hinting that this is a theory worth, considering. What are your thoughts on that? Speaker 1: So my my worry with her and a few others is they they're telling these two parallel stories so close together that what if there's crossover. Right? And I I think, you know, where the the the Jewish money, him being irritated with Israel, having to defend the Gaza Israel war, I'm sure that wore on him. He he got to the point where over 50% of his questions on campuses were about Israel. He didn't wanna talk about Israel. He wanted to talk about America. He wanted to talk about Trump. Right? So the the the thinking that I have is you know, I used to do financial planning. So everybody wants to preserve their capital, and everybody hopes to get a a rate of return on their investment. Right? But when it comes to donations, there's no rate of return, and there's no return of your money. So once you hand over that donation, you literally get nothing back financially. Right? So that's why when somebody donates money, they're donating because they believe that you are going to push forward the thing that they care about. Now whether those donors wanted him to say that Israel's completely innocent of, you know, the this Gaza situation or that Hamas is the most evil thing in the world, I don't think it was that. I think it was, hey. We need to uphold Judeo Christian values. Israel is an ally of ours. But, again, I think he just got tired of that. So when he started bringing Tucker Carlson, who's been very hard on Netanyahu and Israel, he's talking about Candace who's been very hard on Netanyahu and Israel. I think that they're conflating the two together. And I think he was just like, listen. If the donor giving me money is not going to trust me as the CEO to run my corporation, bring conservative values, Judeo Christian values, then it it's not worth it. Like, I don't want it. So if I'm gonna be controlled on what I bring talk about and you're gonna try to make me, talk always about Israel versus America, then you like, you just fell right into these stereotypes. You know? So, again, I I don't know. I'm not here to defend Israel. I don't get any Jewish money. Speaker 0: I don't know. I defend Israel. Like, it's from a from I just I'll say it for you. Like, from a logical perspective, it makes zero sense. Like, I'm very critical for what Israel is doing in Gaza. I've been vocal about it. I was with the former IDF spokesperson yesterday, and I'm critical of that. That doesn't mean and I'm also critical of I don't know what your view on on this, and and it's a different topic, but I'm critical of APAC influence on The US. I think America should put America first instead of any other country first. That doesn't mean Israel did everything. It is I know Mossad is extremely capable, but Mossad is not stupid. You would not kill someone like Charlie Kirk because he's maybe annoyed about the Jewish the pro Israeli donors that he has. So, yeah, I'd I'd dismiss the theory as well. On the on the other theories, though, by Candice, I've wrote them down quickly. Because after I saw those DMs, started watching her videos. She talks about a lot of people talk about the Discord messages between him and his partner being fabricated, he uses words like vehicle, which he doesn't usually speak that way. For me, that's not evidence. You know, maybe he's in a different mood. If someone is serious, they might say a word in a certain way. Speak the way I'm speaking to you now, the way you're speaking to me is very different to how we're gonna speak to our loved one later tonight. So I think people speak differently in different circumstances. Have you looked at those messages? And I'll add one more to it. The posts as well before the shooting, there were posts on Twitter, and those were interesting for me. Not sure if you've seen them. People predicting the assassination. The FBI is investigating them. There's one here says, on September 11, they said, it'd be funny if someone like Charlie Kirk got shot on September 10. Laugh my ass off. That was September 3. Sorry. We've got another one here on August 6. It says September 10 will be a very interesting day, and one of them was followed by the partner of the shooter. So do you think those are coincidences? Have you looked into them at all? They are being investigated by the FBI, so we may hear more about them. Speaker 1: Yeah. I I think there could be, some intelligence or coordination behind the scenes in in my video I put out that you watched. I I said twice on that video, you know, I could see him pulling this off and executing the plan. But as far as planning this, it seems like this was very thought through. Where to come in, how to hide the gun, how to get on the roof, how much time you had, how to jump off the roof, hiding in the trees. All of that seems very planned out. Someone would have had to have known the UVU campus. They would have had to walk it. They you couldn't plan this from Google Maps because roofs would look like sidewalks. All sidewalks would look like the same, you know, elevation. So as far as the text messages go, I have mixed feelings about those because I believe that they're real, but I think they also could have been preplanned in order to make Lance Twigg look innocent. Oh, I had no idea that my lover was gonna go kill this guy. You know? Like, I'm just as shocked as the rest of the world. Right? So I believe they're real. And the forensic expert I talked to, he said, Steven, most people don't realize this, but Tyler Robinson's cell phone is going to be the second most p important piece of evidence next to the gun itself. And I was like, really? And he said, they're going to be able to track whether he went on the week before. They're gonna track every movement second by second of him coming onto campus, getting on the roof, jumping off. There's videos now twenty minutes after the shooting where he has picked up on, like, a cafe's video camera for just a couple of seconds. Right? And people go, wow. Isn't it lucky that that bakery owner just happened to see that? Like, are you kidding me? You went through a thousand hours of video footage to find that. It's because the FBI was tracking his phone. They knew right which parking lot he went to. The next morning, he's at a Maverick gas station at 07:15 in the morning in Cedar City, which is three hours south. How did they know that? He used a credit card, and they're tracking his cell phone. They know everything about what he did on that. They're also going to be able to say, okay. Were these text messages from Tyler sent in Orem down to Lance Twigg in Southern Utah? Was he in Southern Utah, or was he up there? So they're going to be able to track all of that. But just my gut feeling is I believe that the texts are real. What I don't know is did they premeditate that conversation in order to make the boyfriend look innocent? That, I don't know. Speaker 0: That's a logical question. And people don't understand that privacy is pretty much dead. They can know everything about it. It's very difficult to hide anything from authorities now. Didn't they find the the person that was behind the California fires by pinging his phone close to the fires minutes after the fire started? That was just a few days ago. You've seen that in the news. Yeah? It's gonna show you Yes. Yep. Can't if you can spot someone who starts a fire in the middle of a forest, you can easily be able to find out where a shooter was before he took a shot just by having his cell phone. That answers that question. There's another another point mentioned by Candice, just a last point there. She talks about reports, radio chatter early on. I think one of the police members said on the radio, a male and a female suspect. And later on, they corrected that mistake. I'm not sure if you've looked into that. I don't see that as evidenced as a co conspirator with Tyler Robinson. It takes more than one policeman, you know, police officers early after the shooting. They can make mistakes. Maybe they thought they saw someone and then change the account. Not sure if you've seen that report. And lastly, there's also been talks of, I think, trapdoors or kind of a the lecture hall had tunnels under it, I think it was. Speaker 1: Yeah. Let me go through each one of those. So, and I'll add a couple of more. So so I've I've not seen anything credible about him being with a female. Candice is the only one that said that, but even the TMZ video footage, he he's alone going in. He's alone coming out. So I I don't know that. At 07:15 the next morning in Cedar City, it appears that he's by himself based on the video footage. So I don't know about that one. There was another one. A guy named Hustle Bitch put out a video where they're over the radio saying, hey. The FBI is telling us not to question anybody. Right? Well but they could be saying till we get there. Right? Like, just hold people, but don't ask them anything until we can get there. We're we're now taking over the crime scene. So so that's another one. It also came out oh, Charlie Kirk didn't have an autopsy. Everyone went crazy. Right? Of course, they had an autopsy. This was a homicide. Somebody was shot with a gun in the neck. They died. Remove the name Charlie Kirk. It is against the law to not have that. So that one we put to rest. The the trapdoor, it's it's literally irrigation pipes. You you open that up, and there's irrigation pipes for watering the grass moving. So no no trapdoor there. The other thing is I keep seeing all these TikToks where it's like, our friend is literally shot, and then the next day, they're ripping out the grass. Well, they they didn't rip out the grass until the fourteenth. So he's he's killed at 12:23 on the tenth, and then they rip out the grass on the fourteenth. Why did they do that? Blood and human fluids are considered a biohazard. Also, they they're not shutting down the school. There's thousands of students that are walking. There's there when I was there, there were hundreds of people there taking photos, thinking about Charlie, making videos. You don't want a bloody grass stain there, so they rip that out. Why why they're fixing the tunnel? That one, I don't know. But from every picture I've seen, they're they're fixing the ceiling of the tunnel where there would be no blood, no bullet, no damage. So I I don't know that it had anything to do with the Charlie Kirk assassination. I'm trying to think if there's oh oh, another one that Candice put out there. She said, we now know with a 100% certainty that he was not shot and killed with a 30 aught six because it's not on the death certificate. Well, I reach out to the number one forensic expert, the guy that used to run the medical examiner office for Atlanta, Georgia. I asked him. He said, Steven, there's never been a death certificate where they put the type of bullet that killed somebody. They might say gunshot wound, bled to death from gunshot wound, hemorrhage from gunshot wound, shot in the head from gunshot wound, but they will never say that it was nine millimeter bullet or that it was a 20 you know, a a rifle or or something like that. So that one got cleared up for me pretty quickly. So I believe she's confusing the medical examiner's report and the autopsy with a death certificate. A death certificate is basically just to for banking, for closing down accounts, for collecting Social Security, getting a deed moved over into your name, things like that. So that was another one where I don't think that she knows with 100% certainty what kind of a gun or bullet it was because the death certificate never reflects that. Speaker 0: There's also an one last theory from Candice is about a a, I think, an Egyptian military plane taking off right after the shot was taken, I think, an hour after. But turns out she got the timing wrong. I'm trying to find out what the the time she got. The UTC time it was UTC time, not Utah time. So that was another theory that was dispelled pretty quickly. I think Speaker 1: people called it out on x. Yeah. I've heard I've drones. I've heard there were at least six drones flying in Speaker 0: the it's it's insects. Exactly. Exactly. People thought when I was when Speaker 1: I was there, you've got a water feature that they had turned off because it's really noisy. And then you've got grass. There were bugs everywhere even while I was filming. So I believe those are bugs. They also said a billionaire who hasn't flown on his private jet in a year suddenly takes off and turns off his transponder. That was debunked. Derek Cox's shield. Yeah. You've got people saying, why is an IP address in Israel searching Tyler Robinson? You know, it's it it just to me, it's grasping at straws. Speaker 0: Yeah. That was the Google Trends one. You should couldn't like, he put I just saw it today by accident because I was probably I was researching Charlie Kirk, so it popped up on my feed. And it was someone putting Google Trends. Why did someone search Tyler Robinson? And then some other term related, I think, the the the name of the rifle, the type of rifle. Why did they search the type of rifle or the roof he was on, I think? Why did they search it? But he put only a seven day window, there's a spike. In a seven day window, you could probably find the search of any word you can imagine with the billions of searches done on a daily basis. You need, you know, for you to kinda have a valid question, look at beyond just seven days, not within that seven day period. Was in the thirty day period or ninety day period? Was there no one searching except the day before? Then, okay, you can ask a question and try to find the answer for it. You mentioned the jet that took off by Derek Maxfield and turned off the tracking service. So you've got the information came out that the tracking service was not FFA put out a statement clarifying that the transponder was never turned off. And even if it was, it's not that uncommon for it to happen. They they sometimes turn it off in specific when there's an when when when there's a a certain airspace zone that doesn't have traffic control. So that was a pretty common it's it's not no valid question there. The drones one you've talked about. There is one one last question that was getting up, the rifle being assembled or disassembled. So as far as I understand, that was never the official that was not in any official statement that the rifle was disassembled. Is that correct? Speaker 1: So from what I've read, they believe he put some portion of the gun together on the roof before he runs out and lays down. But as far as disassembling it and changing clothes and getting off the roof, I I think that was bad information that has since been corrected. If he's run so I'm just I I try to like, I watch a lot of movies, so I try to just think in terms of movies. Right? Like, he probably lays down the towel. He lays down. He takes the shot, throws the gun, rolls it up, and he's gone. He's off and running within, like, three seconds. It takes him about fourteen seconds from his position to jumping off the roof, and then he's gone into the into the wooded area. So one one thing that that forensic expert told me is he said, Steven, the the dust on the rocks because that roof is covered in in, like, pebbles, rocks. Right? He said that's going to have a unique signature. So it's gonna be on his clothes. It's gonna be on the gun. It's gonna be on his shoes. So he said his shoes are a major part of this investigation. I thought, oh, that's really interesting. I didn't think about that. He said, you know, they're gonna have dust on the tread. They're gonna have soil from where he lays lays the gun. They're gonna have the dust from when he lays down. There's no way to not get dust on your shoes if you lay down. Right? So he said that's gonna be a major part. His car is also going to be a major part of the trial. I said, why? He said, because he's gonna sit down. There's gonna be that dust. There's gonna be soil samples. There's also going to be gun residue from taking a shot on his hands. Now he puts his hands on his steering wheel, so that car is a major part of the evidence as well, which I thought was cool. I I I hadn't thought that far. Speaker 0: Yeah. You also reminded me in in your latest video, Chris Martinson talked about how in the video where Tyler Robinson was running on the roof and jumping off, we talked about it earlier with the rifle under the towel. There was two questions that Chris had. One of them is there's a shadow showing of him running on the roof, and then the shadow disappears when he jumps on a new surface. That's easily explained either by the camera, such as the camera, for various technical reasons, wouldn't show if he jumps, makes a jump, some it wouldn't show the shadow anymore, but more importantly, it was a different surface at a different angle. So that was a more easy to understand explanation that the the shadow won't show anymore. But there was another question he had. He he was asking, he was posing in in his coverage. There was a gentleman were walking in that same video of Tyler Robinson running on the roof. He's walking, walking, and then he goes behind a tree and disappears. He doesn't walk past the tree. So in his mind, maybe the video was edited and they made an error. First, you know, if someone's been able to create this entire scenario and be able to hide it to that level, they won't miss such a simple error. But put that aside, you went there, had a look at the place, and you said the walkway goes down, so that's why the person would not be seen after they walk past the tree? Speaker 1: Yeah. So from the camera's perspective or sorry. If you're if you're down on the ground, what you're gonna see is you're gonna see four big trees. And then it looks it looks like the horizon just keeps going. Right? But if you're on the ground, there's actually four trees. Two of them are lined up from the camera's view, and there's a sidewalk. When that person comes, he goes behind two trees, not just one, and then the path drops off. It goes it it's it's a pretty steep drop. And so it does. It looks like AI. Like, okay. Here's a student, and then all of a sudden, he doesn't come out the backside of that tree. Right there, there's a path. If you pull up Google Earth, you can you can fact check me on that. But, yeah, that explains that. The other thing that he had an issue with is when he's running on the roof, he runs in front of a glass building, and they pick it up. And for just like a split second, the the two different window panes kinda go like that. And he's like, how did that how I we don't know the frame rate. We don't know, you know, why that did that. And then when he goes from the pebbled roof onto the pure bright white, almost every photo editor has said, there's just so much white that a camera that far back just didn't pick up the shadow. So but the palm print is right there, which which I thought was pretty interesting. Speaker 0: Interesting. We've we've covered pretty much all the theories that are out there. I've got maybe a couple of last ones. That was a great job, by the way, Steven. You you know a lot more than I expected. You've got the there's one here about a trans terror cell. So people talking about so they say proponents claim the FBI has admitted to probing multiple accomplices, signing investigations into Discord, chats, text messages, bullet trajectories, and questioning of over 20 people. They say Robinson's text to his transgender roommate are cited as proof of coordination because he said, I had enough of this hatred, which claims the roommate was part of the transterror cell. Now you said the roommate could have been complicit in the assassination, and those text messages that people said are faked might have been fabricated in order to indemnify Robinson's boyfriend. But people have taken it a step further, and they're saying there is a trans terror cell. But from what I've seen, there's no indication beyond speculation. Have you looked into that? Speaker 1: Yeah. My understanding is Kash Patel made an announcement that they're gonna look into everything, including all the conspiracy theories and and these Antifa groups, these trans groups. As of right now, there's been no arrests. So that doesn't mean that they're not just letting those people think that they've gotten away with something. It also doesn't mean that they were accomplices to it. So that one, we we still don't really know. And then the in the Discord chats, from what I understood, and maybe more will come out in the trial, there there was a lot less several days later that came out that was in the Discord. I mean, he did go on and say he basically admitted that he had killed Charlie Kirk. It was great to know you guys and talk about video games, and then the the chat ends. So but from what I read, if you go back in time, he's not, like, planning the murder with these people. So I don't know. I think a lot more is gonna come out in the trial as far as video footage, tracking his geolocation, the gun, all of that. The the mystery for me still is how did this 30 aught six bullet not blast through the back of his neck? But it didn't. And so is it a different caliber? Speaker 0: Says yeah. Matt's I was gonna bring that one up as a last point. Matt Tardio, because I got him and Chris to kinda go back and forth. Matt said there are some variables that would impact how that bullet acts once it enters the body. So one of them is the ammo quality itself. How old is it? The muzzle velocity. I'm not a shooter, I don't know the technicalities. Angle of entry. So Chris Martin talks about a 10 degree angle, approximately nine, ten degrees. Angle of entry, the yaw, the the the the bone impact as well and how's you know, how how how solid the bones were, how strong Charlie Kirk's bones were. And they both agreed that the wound is plausible if the cartridge was weak. Also, the cartridge was engraved. Does that weaken the cartridge? How was it engraved? So there's a lot of questions. And once we see the cartridge, we'll be able to answer the the the whether the casing was weakened or not. But it is according to Matt, who's a green beret, and he's had a lot of experience in this. He said that it is very plausible that, a 30 o six bullet reacts the way it did. What's your what was your conclusion on that point? Speaker 1: So I I think it's much more likely that a 30 aught six got jammed in his neck than that he was shot from behind or shot from a trapdoor. So that's more plausible to me than than some of these, conspiracies. But we're gonna we're gonna have to wait and see. I mean, this is why I brought on a forensic person. This is why I brought on the Lauren the mortician because I don't you know, this is this is out of my level of expertise. But when they start telling me, they took X rays of Charlie's body. That's how they knew exactly where the bullet was. It wasn't that they were just digging around with their fingers in his neck. You know? That thing shined. That's how they knew where the fragments of the bullet were. They're going to use math and trajectory and ballistics with the X-ray to figure out exactly the path of the bullet, the first impact, what was destroyed. So there's a lot that's gonna come out. I wish they would release the autopsy, but they're not going to. I wish they would release more video, but they're not going to. Right now, they are desperately trying to convict Tyler Robinson, get him the death penalty, and then you have Tyler Robinson's attorneys that are desperately trying to free him, but if nothing else, let him go to prison for life. So, I think a lot's gonna come out in the trial. Speaker 0: And do you think that, once the trial is over, that they will release more videos or potentially the autopsy? Or that's They might. Speaker 1: There's a lot that's gonna come out. Because just, you know, all the true crime podcasts that I've listened to, they have so much more data, but all of those are from crimes that are in the past. This is one that is still very much in the present. So I do believe that more is going to come out, but I think right now, they're holding their cards in order to get a conviction. Speaker 0: Yeah. And I think a final point for me is that once it's all about trusting the institutions. If you don't trust the FBI, then anything we've just spoken about, you can question. Because the FBI has significant capabilities. Could they fake they can't fake everything we've just talked about. Obviously, it's, you know, there's too many cameras out there. You know, they got the the sound recordings to be able to find out from the various sound people recording the sound of the bullet getting shot. You'd be able to to to geolocate where that gun was located. You got all these different videos. If someone shot from the back, you can easily catch that person. But people will not trust the autopsy. They'll not trust these videos if they don't trust the FBI. So I think the question eventually boils down to how much do you trust the authorities, and and, you know, you've got the right to question them. But if you don't trust anything they say, then it's hard for you to believe anything we've really talked about here, any all the evidence that's been released or they released. But I think, Steven, you've done the best coverage on this from what I've seen. I think you've you've objectively analyzed everything, and you knew about every single theory. And I had to watch all these different videos to kinda collate all the theories that people are coming up with, and you've known about all of them. You've investigated all of them. So it's it's a been pleasure to have a conversation about this. Thank you. Thank you very much.
BasedSamParker
Posted - October 22, 2025 at 7:30 PM
Saved - October 22, 2025 at 10:12 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I note Skyler Baird was searched from Israel and DC prior to the assassination, but not Utah. He has 2,400 followers (account since 2006) with only 7 posts, 5 after the event. Before the assassination: a Coast Guard helicopter photo (2018) and a July 2025 Epstein FB post. One LDS verse post; unorthodox rat-tail haircut. A curious link to Daniel Merrell of Hardscape Utah. Watch the HustleBitch_ video. Who is this guy, and how does he get close access to Charlie Kirk?

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

MORE CHARLIE KIRK BREAKING, THE MYSTERY Of "RANDOM" ASSASSINATION WITNESS SKYLER BAIRD: ▪️Skyler Baird was searched from israel and DC prior to the assassination, but not from Utah. (see below) ▪️He has 2,400 followers on an account created in 2006, but only 7 posts ever to the page, 5 of which are since the assassination. (source below) ▪️Before Assassination: 1 old picture of him working as a Coast Guard helicopter team member in 2018. (pic below) ▪️Before Assassination: 1 Jeffrey Epstein FB post from July 10, 2025 (1 israeli search of him was from July 3rd, 2025). (pictured below) ▪️1 FB post is a semi-obscure verse from the Book of Mormon, signaling devout LDS membership, but doesn't appear to be wearing the LDS garments. No discernible undershirt or telltale outlines around the thighline or neckline. (pictured below) ▪️Has a weird little rat tail hair-do, definitely unorthodox for a Mormon. Like really unorthodox. I've never seen a fellow Mormon man--devout or otherwise--wear his hair like that. (shown below) ▪️Has a strange interaction with Daniel Merrell--the guy from Hardscape Utah who allegedly paved over the crime scene on the Sunday morning after the assassination. (shown below) Make sure to watch the video posted by @HustleBitch_ below to more fully understand these details. (quote tweeted below) Who is this guy? And how does he keep getting such close access to Charlie Kirk?

@HustleBitch_ - HustleBitch

🚨 WATCH THIS CLOSELY. 🚨 THE “EYEWITNESS” FROM CHARLIE KIRK’S ASSASSINATION ENDED UP VIP AT HIS MEMORIAL Meet Skyler Baird, the guy seen right behind Charlie’s head when the shot went off. He gave four VERY STRANGE interviews claiming he was just a random bystander… but the footage doesn’t lie. He started back in the crowd, then somehow moved to the front row moments before the shooting. Days later, he’s on the main floor center at Charlie’s memorial with a MEDIA badge, just rows from the stage after saying he probably couldn’t even get in. His Facebook? 2.4K followers. 7 posts. No content. No history. Just a “digital creator” tag and front-row access everywhere. He was front row for the assassination… then cleared three security checkpoints to sit VIP at the memorial? That’s not coincidence. That’s placement. Was he a witness… or part of the setup?

Video Transcript AI Summary
The clip centers on Skyler, a man seen in multiple interviews right after the Charlie Kirk assassination. The presenters highlight that Skyler appeared in about four online interviews, and he’s pictured with sunglasses on top of his head behind Charlie’s head. They note that the day Charlie Kirk was shot, Skyler was front row to witness it, and in the interviews he never claims to be press or someone important, yet he sits on the Main Floor at the Charlie Kirk Memorial. They question how this is possible and point to oddities in his interviews. In one sequence, Skyler is described as being only about 10 to 15 feet away when it happened, with security to his left and nothing else in front of him—“Close as he could.” They show Skyler and Charlie’s bodyguard moving to a different area once Charlie arrives and questions begin. Skyler is described as front row and center, with the bodyguard directly in front of Charlie and Skyler off to the side with sunglasses on his head. The footage is contrasted with his Facebook activity, which the speakers examine afterward. They state that at the memorial service Skyler was “sitting on the Main Floor” with a floor pass for a press conference, seated literally “maybe 10 or so rows from the front of the stage.” They contrast this with Skyler’s Facebook page, noting that he has “two point, I think, k followings,” and that from 2018 to 02/2025 there are “maybe seven posts and like 10 pictures.” The presenters remark that there is little material on his page, suggesting a discrepancy between his apparent access and his online footprint. Further, the speakers recount Skyler’s account of entering the stadium. He says, “There is an unlimited amount of security, Secret service, military, police, empty. Steel barricades all around. Yeah. They’re definitely protecting this place,” and adds that there had been “an overflow,” with people waiting since 05:30 in the morning. Yet Skyler ends up with a floor pass and sits just a few rows back on the Main Floor with a badge that says media, prompting the question: “How?” They describe how another person explained the process of passing through multiple layers to obtain a media badge and access the floor. The discussion turns speculative: Skyler “was handpicked to do all these interviews,” to have “front row” seating, and to be present at key moments. The dialogue then shifts to a series of unusual videos by Skyler, described as “bizarre.” One clip contains a speaker describing an “indecision night” where they say, “I photoshopped in my mind the blood away,” “I rewound the tape,” and “the shooter… goes down the stairs,” with continued vivid, fantastical editing of the event.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Okay. The Skyler guy gave about four different interviews online right after the Charlie Kirk assassination. Oddly enough, he is also seen right there with the glasses, right behind Charlie's head. The day that he was shot, he was front row to witness it. And then in all of his media interviews, he never once says he's press or anyone of importance, yet somehow he is able to sit on the Main Floor at the Charlie Kirk Memorial. Who is this guy? How is this possible? And why are his interviews so odd? And wait until you see where he was at the beginning of the day and then how he has moved to the front row. Very odd. Speaker 1: Watch the video for, like, 10. Speaker 2: It's like Speaker 1: Maybe 10 or 15 feet away when it happened. Speaker 2: Close as he could. Speaker 1: To my left is security. In the front of me is a security guard and then nothing else. Just Charlie Speaker 2: Baird says. Speaker 0: Okay. If you notice here, Skyler is the air is pointing it, and he's got those sunglasses kinda on top of his head, and then you're gonna see Charlie's bodyguard right there. So you see how they're kinda up against the wall? This was taken before it all started. This was around noon. So he's kinda up in the crowd, and the bodyguard is up in the crowd, which I find very odd because he's, like, behind the gate up into the crowd. And what you're gonna see next is it'll be the live footage of someone recording it, and this is around, like I said, noon, I believe. There they are. The bodyguard's kinda looking back towards him, and that's Skyler right there with the glasses on his head. Now do you see how far back they are kind of in the audience? Now you're actually gonna see where Skyler and the bodyguard move to a completely different area once Charlie gets there and the questions get started. So there is the bodyguard directly in front of Charlie, and then Skyler is over to the side with those sunglasses on his head directly off to the side corner of Charlie. So and that's exactly how he described it in that interview where he was and how he was positioned, how he said he was front row, Noel was in front of him. He had a bodyguard to the left of him and one in front of him. And so that is Skyler right there, front row and center. So this guy got front row seats. He's done all these interviews. And then I go and I find his Facebook and find out that at the memorial service, he was sitting on the Main Floor and had a floor pass press conference and was sitting literally, like, maybe 10 or so rows Speaker 1: Ruins that. Speaker 0: From the front of the stage. Speaker 2: He's since found some clarity. Speaker 1: Story was that Charlie Kirk was murdered for his political views. Speaker 2: And as everyone contemplates what's next Speaker 1: there's a cancer growing in our society. Speaker 2: He hopes for reflection Speaker 1: because there's a real cancer in our society and it's not just But Speaker 2: I know you were talking about the excitement there and focusing on the positives. So how do you wanna make sure that that he's remembered? Speaker 0: Okay. Now here he is sitting on the Main Floor at the Charlie Kirk Memorial, and I'm gonna get to that in a second because it's on his Facebook. But when we get to his Facebook page, something I really noticed was he's got two point, I think, k followings. So you think he'd have, like, a lot of stuff on his page that is interesting because, I mean, I'm gonna follow something, someone if their page has got, you know, all this awesome content on it and I wanna go back and, you know, view it all. He literally, from 2018 to to 02/2025, has maybe seven posts and like 10 pictures. This is his page, his Facebook page. I followed it so I could, you know, following it so I could view everything as if I'm following him. No reels, no nothing. He's a digital creator for what? This is all he has. That's 02/1978 post. But listen to him here. Speaker 1: Just made it to the stadium. There is an unlimited amount of security, Secret service, military, police, empty. Steel barricades all around. Yeah. They're definitely protecting this place. The all signs point to us not being able to get in, but the stadium's already overflown. The overflow's already overflown, and this is an hour before start time. There's been people waiting in line since 05:30 in the morning. Speaker 0: Okay. Notice how he said, and I don't know if I'm gonna be able to get in because people have been waiting out here forever. Okay. But then he gets a floor pass and gets to sit literally a few rows back on the Main Floor with a Did you hear pass that says media? How? Who is this guy? Speaker 1: I went past the first layer, letting him know that I was here for media. Went past the second layer. And the third layer required me to have a badge, and then we took it down to the floor. So that became requisite of me to get a badge. Speaker 3: So, Speaker 0: again, why go into detail acting as if you were late, you didn't even know you were gonna get in, yet somehow you end up with a passing all these checkpoints to get a media pass around your deck, end up on the First, you know, Main Floor just a few rows back to the Charlie Kirk Memorial that day. It's just like it's like it's a big act, a big show that this guy's putting on. It's like he was handpicked to do all these interviews. He was handpicked to have front row that day because he was up, you know, farther up in the crowd before Charlie got there. And then lo and behold, he's literally front row right there to see when Charlie, you know, was shot. Who is this guy? It's like he was planted in. Everything about this guy just screams or he flags me. Something is off. Who is he and who is he tied to? And seriously, go watch his videos. They are bizarre. Speaker 3: An indecision night. I I photoshopped in my mind. I photoshopped the blood away. I photoshopped Charlie, sat him back up, put his smile back on, and re rewound the tape in my mind. I rewound the bullet going back up into the rifle. I I was being transported up into this where the rifle was, and I I stuck a flower inside the rifle. I rewound the tape more in my mind's eye and the shooter. He goes down the stairs. I'm rewinding him. I'm I'm push
ProjectConstitu
Posted - December 2, 2025 at 4:27 PM
Saved - December 2, 2025 at 6:13 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I connect the dots the media won’t touch: Owens claims a French official says Macron green-lit her assassination with a $1.5M payoff; a network including Israeli assets is tied to Kirk’s case. The shooter’s identity is disputed by a French source, who hints training by the French Foreign Legion. Tennessee Gov. Lee meets Israeli diplomats and oversees a $1.5B Orano deal, while silence comes from FBI, the Élysée, and the governor. Anti-Macron voices targeted; archives scrubbed. Demand accountability.

@ProjectConstitu - Project Constitution

🚨EXPOSED: TENNESSEE Just Became GROUND ZERO For The CANDACE OWENS / CHARLIE KIRK COVER-UP Let’s connect the dots the media refuses to touch: 1️⃣ Candace Owens (who lives in Tennessee) goes public: A high-level French government official warns her that Macron personally green-lit her assassination. $1.5 million allegedly paid. Squad includes one Israeli operative + French Foreign Legion assets. Same network allegedly behind Charlie Kirk’s public execution. 2️⃣ Candace’s French source NEVER said “Tyler Robinson” was the shooter. They said “Charlie Kirk’s assassin trained with the French Foreign Legion 13th Brigade.” Candace clarified last night: “Tyler Robinson is the patsy. He never even stepped on that campus. His only ‘job’ was dropping clothes by a Dairy Queen & cemetery to frame him.” France’s “denial” only said “Tyler Robinson was never in the Legion.” That’s not a denial — that’s a confession they know he’s not the real shooter. 3️⃣ Tennessee Governor Bill Lee’s VERY interesting calendar: • November 19 — private meeting with Israeli Consul General Eitan Weiss in Nashville, full photo op, “continued support for Israel.” • Same state just handed Macron’s government-owned company Orano 920 acres in Oak Ridge + $1.5 BILLION in incentives (Macron personally restructured Orano when he was Economy Minister). • Israel is the ONLY foreign government aggressively selling bonds directly to U.S. states — Tennessee is buying. 4️⃣ Silence is deafening: • Candace reported the threat to FBI, White House, counter-terrorism → zero public response. • Élysée Palace → zero denial of the $1.5M hit. • Governor Lee → zero comment on any of it while meeting the exact foreign players named. So let me get this straight… The two loudest anti-Macron, anti-deep-state voices in America (Charlie Kirk & Candace Owens) both get targeted. One is publicly executed. One is told she’s next. Both cases point to French + Israeli assets. And the Governor of the state where Candace lives is quietly cutting billion-dollar deals with Macron’s company and posing for photos with Israeli diplomats — weeks after the hits? 5️⃣ But wait—evidence is VANISHING: Tried pulling Macron's official 2023 Orano announcement vid from France 24 & Even the OFFICIAL Élysée Palace Archive?Straight 404 errors. YouTube embed? "This video isn't available anymore." Dug deeper: Internet Archive's Wayback Machine? ZERO snapshots archived from May 2023 onward—no traces, no redirects, nada. A routine state visit from 2+ years ago, scrubbed clean across official sites and global archives? Right as Candace exposes Macron's hit squad? This isn't "lost media"—it's a digital hit job. They're erasing the paper trail before your eyes. Share screenshots NOW before they vanish too. So let me get this straight… The two loudest anti-Macron, anti-deep-state voices in America (Charlie Kirk & Candace Owens) both get targeted. One is publicly executed. One is told she’s next. Both cases point to French + Israeli assets. And the Governor of the state where Candace lives is quietly cutting billion-dollar deals with Macron’s company and posing for photos with Israeli diplomats — weeks after the hits? Now they're memory-holing the proof? If this happened in a movie you’d call it “too obvious.” But it’s happening in real life — and they’re hoping you stay asleep. Tag someone who still thinks this is “conspiracy theory.” Tag Governor Bill Lee and demand answers.Tag @RealCandaceO, The clock is ticking.

@ProjectConstitu - Project Constitution

🚨BOMBSHELL: Utah Gov's Secret Meetings with Egypt & France Just EXPOSED – 13 Days After Kirk's Assassination! WHAT ARE THEY HIDING?😱 On Sept 10, 2025, Charlie Kirk was gunned down at UVU. The nation mourned. The manhunt raged.But 13 days later—Sept 23—Cox turned Utah's Capitol Gold Room into a clandestine hub for FOREIGN INTEL HEAVYWEIGHTS from EGYPT & FRANCE. Back-to-back. Zero public trace. What We Know: 🔴11:30 AM: Closed-door meeting with Egyptian Ambassador Motaz Zahran—D.C. intel boss bridging Egypt, Israel, US secrets. Speaks French & Arabic. 🔴3:30 PM: Closed door meeting with French Consul General Florian Cardinaux—SF-based, DGSE intel pipeline on speed dial. SAME BUILDING. SAME DAY. BURIED DEEP in internal calendars from http://governor.utah.gov. Erased from press, X, everything. No photos. No statements. Recall: Egyptian planes shadowed the hit? French Prez allegedly greenlit a strike on Candace Owens? This isn't diplomacy. This is DAMAGE CONTROL. Or WORSE. Who pulled strings to fly these spooks to SLC? What "classified" whispers exchanged while America grieved? Utah's governor—our governor—hosting enemy intel shadows in silence? @SpencerJCox @GovCoxOffice Explain This? Charlie's blood cries out. We won't forget. DEMAND ANSWERS Everyone Please FOLLOW @Mia_Stretch, She Is The Person Who Brought This To My Attention.

Governor Spencer J. Cox governor.utah.gov

@ProjectConstitu - Project Constitution

🚨 CONFIRMED: Macron's "Death Squad" Behind Candace Owens Assassination Plot? Russian Intel Confirms the Nightmare Is Real👀 Candace Owens just dropped a bombshell: A French gov't insider warns the Macrons greenlit her murder via elite Gendarmerie hit squad—with Israeli ties & https://t.co/GhSCnJenQ6

Video Transcript AI Summary
A sensational set of allegations has been put forward by the foundation for the fight against injustice, claiming that French President Emmanuel Macron is overseeing a secret death squad. The group alleges the existence of Lilly (also spelled Lily in places), a covert unit operating under the direct orders of the Elysee Palace. Lilly, described as 40 to 50 elite operatives drawn from France’s intelligence services (DGSE and DGSI), is said to be capable of killing critics with methods that mimic natural or accidental deaths, including poisonings, staged car crashes, balcony falls, and overdoses. The report centers on Alexandre Bernalla (referred to in the transcript with variants such as Bernaleau), once Macron’s trusted security aide who was dismissed, charged, and convicted after a May Day protest confrontation. The foundation claims Bernalla is now the linchpin of Lilly, orchestrating a network of killers. It also names other alleged figures: Bernard Emie, former head of the DGSE, as a key coordinator; Patrick Strolda, Macron’s chief of staff, accused of funneling funds through off-the-books channels to sustain the unit; and Laurent Nunez, a top security official, said to be in charge of recruiting operatives. If true, the allegations depict a well-funded machine backed by powerful figures within France. The claimed operation is described as a playbook straight from a spy thriller: poisonings that mimic heart attacks, car crashes that look like accidents, suicides framed from balcony falls, and overdoses designed to discredit victims. The foundation argues that the number of coincidences involving Macron’s critics—journalists, activists, and politicians—suggests a pattern beyond chance. However, there is no hard evidence tying these men directly to assassinations. The claims rely largely on anonymous testimonies from French politicians and journalists, and there are questions about the source’s transparency. The foundation’s credibility is contested, and there is an atmosphere of doubt about whether Lilly exists at all. Dismissals of the claims include speculation about coordinated smear campaigns, possibly fueled by Macron’s domestic enemies or foreign actors such as Russia, which is accused of disseminating disinformation about him. Macron’s supporters counter that he remains a reformer pursuing growth and international diplomacy, pointing to investments like the €20,000,000,000 secured at the 2025 Choose France Summit. The Elysee Palace has likewise pushback against far-fetched claims, including previous debunked rumors about Macron on trains with other European leaders, attributed to Kremlin-backed accounts. The discussion weighs whether Lilly is a genuine hidden operation or a fabrication, while acknowledging that anonymous sources and a lack of verifiable documents complicate the truth. Ultimately, the discussion frames Lilly as either a symbol of a dangerous abuse of power or a tool of disinformation, illustrating how distrust in institutions can be amplified by sensational claims. The core takeaway is that Macron’s presidency is a lightning rod, with Lilly allegations highlighting broader questions about trust in government and the fragility of democratic institutions.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If you think the French government is all about liberty and transparency, what I'm about to tell you might shatter that illusion. Explosive allegations have surfaced, claiming president Emmanuel Macron is running a secret death squad. Yes, you heard that right. A covert team of assassins targeting journalists, politicians, and activists who dared to oppose him. Stay with me, because this story is about to take you down a rabbit hole of power, betrayal and chilling conspiracies that could redefine what you think about modern France. This isn't just another political scandal. It's a bombshell investigation from the foundation for the fight against injustice. A group claiming to have uncovered evidence of a clandestine unit operating under the direct orders of the Elysee Palace. They call it Lily, a nod to the fleur de lis, France's ancient symbol of royalty, and it's allegedly made up of 40 to 50 elite operatives, handpicked for their ability to kill without hesitation. We're talking poisonings, staged accidents, and sniper hits, all designed to look like tragic coincidences. But as these incidents pile up, the question looms. Is this the work of a democratic leader or something far darker? The accusations point to a shadowy network tied to some of Macron's closest allies, including a name you might recognize, Alexandra Benalla, a figure already infamous for his role in violent incidents. If these claims are true, they could expose a level of corruption and control that rivals the darkest chapters of political history. But before we dive deeper, let's ask ourselves, how did we get here, and why should you care? Because if a government can silence its critics in the shadows, what does that mean for freedom anywhere? The story starts with whispers, rumors that have been circulating in France's political underbelly for years. Macron, elected in 2017 as a fresh face of progressive reform, has faced mounting criticism for his handling of protests, economic policies, and foreign affairs. From the yellow vest movement to his controversial pension reforms, he's no stranger to public backlash. But according to posts found on X, the foundation for the fight against injustice has taken these criticisms to a whole new level, alleging that Macron didn't just weather opposition, he eliminated it, literally. The report claims that Lilly is a highly trained unit, drawn from the ranks of France's intelligence agencies, the DGSE and DGSI. These aren't your average hired thugs. We're talking about battle hardened veterans, operatives who've spent years in covert operations, chosen for their loyalty and their ability to execute orders without question. The Fleurs de Lis codename is particularly telling. It's a symbol tied to French monarchy, a nod to absolute power. Is Maquel, a president who's often been accused of acting like a king, leaning into that imagery? Or is this just a clever way to mask something even more sinister? At the heart of this alleged operation is Alexandre Bernalla, a name that sends chills down the spine of anyone familiar with French politics. Bernaleau was once Macron's trusted security aid, but he fell from grace in 2018 after video surfaced of him assaulting protesters during a May Day demonstration. The scandal rocked France, raising questions about unchecked power in Macron's inner circle. Bernaleau was sacked, charged, and convicted. But according to the foundation, that was just the beginning. They claim he's now the linchpin of Lilly, orchestrating a network of killers under the president's orders. The report also names other heavyweights allegedly involved. Bernard Emie, former head of the DGSE, is said to be a key figure in coordinating operations Patrick Strolda, Macron's chief of staff, is accused of funneling funds through off the books channels to keep the unit running. And Laurent Nunez, a top security official, is allegedly in charge of recruiting these operatives. If true, this isn't just a rogue operation, It's a well oiled machine backed by some of the most powerful figures in France. But here's where it gets murky. There's no hard evidence linking these men directly to assassinations. So, are these accusations a smoking gun or just smoking mirrors? Let's talk about the methods. The foundation claims Lily uses a playbook straight out of a spy thriller. Poisonings that mimic heart attacks, car crashes that look like accidents, falls from balconies chalked up to suicide, even overdoses staged to discredit victims. These aren't wild shootouts in the streets. They're subtle, calculated hits designed to avoid suspicion. But the report argues that the sheer number of coincidences involving Macron's critics is too much to ignore. Journalists who've investigated government corruption suddenly dying in car wrecks. Activists found dead after publicizing anti Macron campaigns. Politicians suffering unexplained medical emergencies. The pattern, they say, is undeniable. This sounds like something out of a movie. Could a modern democracy like France really harbor a secret death squad? It's a fair question. France is a nation built on the ideals of liberty, equality, and fraternity. It's a member of the G7, a beacon of Western democracy. But history tells us that even democracies can have dark secrets. Look at the CIA's covert operations during the Cold War or the extrajudicial killings tied to other governments. Speaker 1: However, when threatened, doesn't always play by the rules, and Macron's presidency has been anything but smooth. Since taking office, Macron has faced relentless challenges. The yellow vest protests sparked by fuel tax hikes in 2018 turned into a broader revolt against his perceived elitism. His decision to dissolve parliament in 2024 led to political chaos, with the far right emerging as a major force. His international moves, like pushing for a ceasefire in Ukraine or recognizing Palestine, have drawn both praise and criticism. Add to that the economic strain of French companies investing abroad while domestic unrest grows, and you've got a president under siege. Could a leader in this position resort to extreme measures to maintain control? It's not unthinkable these are serious allegations, and we need to approach them with a critical eye. The foundation for the fight against injustice, the source of these claims, isn't exactly a household name. Who are they? Their website describes them as a human rights organization, but there's little public record of their funding or leadership. The lack of transparency raises red flags. And the evidence? It's largely based on anonymous testimonies from French politicians and journalists. Without names, documents, or verifiable proof, it's hard to separate fact from fiction. Could this be a coordinated smear campaign, possibly fuelled by Macron's enemies, like Russia, which has been accused of spreading disinformation about him. Speaking of disinformation, Macron's team has been quick to push back. The Elysee Palace has a history of batting down wild claims, like the recent rumor about Macron using cocaine on a train with other European leaders. They called that absurd and pointed to Kremlin backed accounts as the source. Could the Lilly allegations be another Russian ploy to destabilize France? It's possible Macron's vocal support for Ukraine and his push for European unity make him a prime target for Moscow's propaganda machine. Yet dismissing the claims outright feels too easy. What if there's a kernel of truth buried in the noise? Macron's defenders argue he's a reformer fighting against a tide of populism and external threats. His push for foreign investment, like the €20,000,000,000 secured at the twenty twenty five Choose France Summit, shows a leader focused on growth. His diplomatic efforts from Syria to Ukraine paint him as a statesman, not a dictator. And the banala scandal old news, they say a minor embarrassment that's been blown out of proportion. But the counterargument doesn't erase the questions: Why do so many of Macron's critics meet untimely ends? And why does his administration seem so quick to label any criticism as fake news? Here's where the story takes a darker turn. If Lilly exists, it's not just about Macron, it's about the system that enables him. The DGSE and DGSI are among the most sophisticated intelligence agencies in the world. They've got the tech, the training, and the resources to pull off covert operations without leaving a trace. And France's history of espionage is no secret. From the sinking of the rainbow warrior in 1985 to the wiretapping scandals of the 1990s, the French state has a track record of playing dirty when it suits them. Could Lily be the latest chapter in that story? Let's imagine for a moment that these allegations are true. Picture a secret meeting in the Elysee where Macron, Benalla, and a handful of loyalists plot to silence a journalist who's getting too close to a corruption scandal. The order goes out, and within days, the target is gone a heart attack, a fall, a car crash. The public mourns, the media moves on, and the regime breathes easier. It's chilling, but it's not impossible. Power protects itself, and history is littered with examples of leaders who crossed lines to stay in control. But here's the flip side: what if this is all a fabrication? Macron's enemies, both domestic and foreign, have every reason to paint him as a villain. The far right, which has gained ground in France, thrives on narratives of betrayal and corruption. Russia, stung by Macron's support for Ukraine, has a clear motive to spread lies, and the foundation's reliance on anonymous sources makes it easy to dismiss their claims as gossip. Without concrete evidence, documents, recordings, or named witnesses, it's hard to take the story at face value. So where does that leave us? Caught in a fog of uncertainty, that's where. The truth is, we don't know if Lilly exists. The allegations are explosive, but they're also unproven. What we do know is that France is at a crossroads. Macron's presidency is under fire, his country is divided, and the stakes couldn't be higher. If these claims are true, they expose a terrifying abuse of power. If they're false, they're a stark reminder of how disinformation can weaponize doubt to destabilize a nation. Let's zoom out. This isn't just about France it's about what happens when trust in institutions crumbles, When people start believing their leaders are capable of anything murder, cover ups, betrayal it erodes the foundation of democracy. And that's the real danger here. Whether Lilly is real or not, the fact that these allegations are gaining traction shows how fragile faith in government has become. Every coincidence, every unexplained death fuels the fire, and in a world where truth is harder to pin down, that fire spreads fast. So what's the takeaway? Macron's presidency is a lightning rod, loved by some, loathed by others. The 'Lilly' allegations, true or not, are a symptom of a deeper problem, a growing distrust in power.
SGTreport
Posted - December 6, 2025 at 6:32 PM
Saved - December 7, 2025 at 1:30 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m saying Charlie Kirk’s assassination coverup is the most important story. Everyone trashing Candace Owens is covering for the real assassins. A massive multi-state conspiracy to murder Charlie Kirk. Liars include: TPUSA leadership, Timcast, Scrowder, Ben Shapiro, Mark Levin, Graham Allen. Who am I missing?

@SGTreport - SGTreport

Charlie Kirk's assassination COVERUP is the most important story in the world right now. EVERYONE who is shitting on @RealCandaceO is ACTIVELY running cover for the REAL assassins (plural). This was a MASSIVE multi-state conspiracy to MURDER Charlie Kirk. SO THE LIARS include: @TPUSA leadership, @Timcast @GmorganJr @scrowder @AshtonForbes @DefiyantlyFree @benshapiro @marklevinshow @GrahamAllen Who am I missing?? Let me know below. ·

@ProjectConstitu - Project Constitution

🚨 BREAKING: FRENCH FOREIGN LEGION SOLDIER CAUGHT 10 FEET From CHARLIE KIRK Right BEFORE The SHOT — Same Unit Also HUNTING Candace Owens?! 😱 Same Unit Tied to the Candace Owens Hit Squad? I’m not saying it’s a coincidence… but explain THIS Look at this photo from inside the secure zone at Charlie Kirk’s last event. Dead center: a man in a Marseille hat standing literally feet away from Charlie, inside security perimeters that regular people couldn’t even dream of getting through. Why does this matter? Camp de Carpiagne — the elite French Foreign Legion training base — is 18 miles from Marseille. Same exact region. Same exact unit that intel sources have repeatedly tied to the active plot against Candace Owens… and now we find one of their boys in a Marseille cap inside the kill box the day Charlie drops? This isn’t “random European tourist” energy. This is “I have credentials, I know exactly where to stand, and nobody stopped me” energy. So let’s ask the question TPUSA doesn’t want asked: ❓French military asset? ❓Part of the same team that’s reportedly coming for Candace? ❓Just the world’s unluckiest vacation? We’re only looking for the truth. If you ARE this guy in the Marseille hat and you’ve got an innocent explanation — inbox is open, no judgment. If you KNOW this guy — slide into my DM's right now. Because after everything that’s come out in the last 48 hours… another “coincidence” like this isn’t a coincidence anymore. Tag @RealCandaceO and share with everyone who still thinks Charlie’s death was just some “lone wolf.” The puzzle pieces are stacking up and they all point overseas. Who is Marseille Hat Guy? Drop your theories below. The clock is ticking. 👀

ProjectConstitu
Posted - December 6, 2025 at 7:15 PM
Saved - December 8, 2025 at 12:31 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m highlighting a massive update tying the Marseille hat to a Foreign Legion unit, not a random tourist souvenir. The hat guy was within 20 feet of Charlie Kirk, possibly on an inner security allow list. The hater appears linked to Camp de Carpiagne, home base for 1er REC commandos, suggesting a trained op rather than coincidence. Post-shot, he exits to a black SUV in seconds. Marseille's military density supports a hub for ops; DGSE link is claimed, with Legion as the offshore muscle. The implication: foreign assets inside TPUSA perimeters.

@ProjectConstitu - Project Constitution

🚨 MASSIVE UPDATE: The Marseille Hat Conspiracy Just Got DEEPER – French Foreign Legion Assassin Ties EXPOSED! 😱🔥 If you thought the French Legion soldier lurking 10ft from Charlie Kirk was wild... buckle up. Shoutout to @GoingStrategic (FOLLOW HIM!) who dug HOURS into this rabbit hole & uncovered BREAKTHROUGHS that SCREAM foreign op. This isn't coincidence – it's a pattern. Thread incoming, but here's the BOMBSHELLS: 1️⃣ VIP SECURITY BREACH: The hat guy? Likely on TPUSA's "ALLOW LIST" for the INNER SECURITY ZONE. He was ~20ft from Charlie DURING the shot. Regulars don't get that close. We're talking CREDS. His NAME is out there – who recognizes him? 👀 2️⃣ LEGION HQ CONFIRMED: That Marseille hat? Bought 1-18 MILES from Camp de Carpiagne – elite French Foreign Legion base. Not random tourist merch. This is HOME TURF for the unit hunting elites like Charlie & Candace. 3️⃣ NARROWED TO COMMANDOS: Zooming in: 1er Régiment étranger de cavalerie (1er REC) – the SPECIFIC Legion squad training AT Carpiagne. Armored cavalry pros. Assassins in berets. Coincidence? Nah. 4️⃣ INSTANT EXTRACTION: Post-shot, hat guy "exfills" to a BLACK SUV with HATCH OPEN – SLAMS shut in <2 SECS. Planned getaway? Security cams don't lie. He KNEW the play. 5️⃣ MARSEILLE = MILITARY GHOST TOWN: Southern France's "wild west" – 9HR train from Paris (pop center). High military density, low tourists. Perfect op hub. Why there? Follow the Legion. 6️⃣ DGSE HIT SQUAD LINK: France's CIA (DGSE) deploys Service Action elites for wet work. But guess what? NONE of their Paris-based commandos (CPES, CPEOM, etc.) operate in Marseille. ONLY the FOREIGN LEGION does. Overseas muscle for black ops. Charlie was collateral... or was he TARGET #2 after Candace? This ties DIRECTLY to the Owens plot intel. Foreign assets inside TPUSA perimeters? WAKE UP. @TPUSA @MrsErikaKirk @RealCandaceO – your teams need to TALK. Be wary of who is protecting you? Please Tag @RealCandaceO

@ProjectConstitu - Project Constitution

🚨 BREAKING: FRENCH FOREIGN LEGION SOLDIER CAUGHT 10 FEET From CHARLIE KIRK Right BEFORE The SHOT — Same Unit Also HUNTING Candace Owens?! 😱 Same Unit Tied to the Candace Owens Hit Squad? I’m not saying it’s a coincidence… but explain THIS Look at this photo from inside the secure zone at Charlie Kirk’s last event. Dead center: a man in a Marseille hat standing literally feet away from Charlie, inside security perimeters that regular people couldn’t even dream of getting through. Why does this matter? Camp de Carpiagne — the elite French Foreign Legion training base — is 18 miles from Marseille. Same exact region. Same exact unit that intel sources have repeatedly tied to the active plot against Candace Owens… and now we find one of their boys in a Marseille cap inside the kill box the day Charlie drops? This isn’t “random European tourist” energy. This is “I have credentials, I know exactly where to stand, and nobody stopped me” energy. So let’s ask the question TPUSA doesn’t want asked: ❓French military asset? ❓Part of the same team that’s reportedly coming for Candace? ❓Just the world’s unluckiest vacation? We’re only looking for the truth. If you ARE this guy in the Marseille hat and you’ve got an innocent explanation — inbox is open, no judgment. If you KNOW this guy — slide into my DM's right now. Because after everything that’s come out in the last 48 hours… another “coincidence” like this isn’t a coincidence anymore. Tag @RealCandaceO and share with everyone who still thinks Charlie’s death was just some “lone wolf.” The puzzle pieces are stacking up and they all point overseas. Who is Marseille Hat Guy? Drop your theories below. The clock is ticking. 👀

EvanAKilgore
Posted - December 9, 2025 at 11:57 PM
Saved - December 10, 2025 at 1:13 AM

@EvanAKilgore - Evan Kilgore 🇺🇸

MUST WATCH: Candace Owens received a credible tip (from a man who was in witness protection) that may prove the U.S. military was involved in Charlie Kirk's assassination. The man alleges he saw Brian Harpole at a high level military meeting in AZ days before C.K. was murdered. https://t.co/dz0FeMSkSH

Video Transcript AI Summary
A young military man did his job excellently and accidentally uncovered that our government was implicated in working with the cartels, not fighting them. He later realized that the government then fed him to the cartels, and he’s been on the run for his life for 35 years. Over the years he faced abusive litigation, harassment by narco attorneys, and police records that were allegedly disappeared. He has presented evidence of hitmen coming after him, and after decades he finally obtained his paperwork with the help of county clerks who retrieved records. In May 2025, the man, now 56 and with a new name, was released from a 35-year military-grade NDA. Deciding to confront his past, he travels from Washington back to the base where it began—Fort Huachuca, Arizona. He books a stay at Candlewood Suites on the base and arrives on September 8 at 5:37 PM. In the lobby he notices a Special Forces-looking person and a young woman who leave in a green pickup with him. The next morning, September 9, at about 5:30 AM, he goes off base to get coffee in Sierra Vista and meets soldiers wearing 10th Mountain Division patches. They tell him that Joint Task Force Six has continued as Joint Task Force Southern Border (JTF Southern Border) and that a building is being used as a temporary command center. He proceeds to the new JTF headquarters around 7:37 AM and meets two or three men who are friendly. He sees about 12 lieutenant colonels and notes the presence of a key figure who he believes is Brian Harpole. Allegedly, after this the situation escalates. The man is confronted by two captains who escort him out and subject him to a seven-hour interrogation, during which they suspect him of being a spy. He is accused of being a bomb threat due to alleged special forces or EOD connections, and he is gaslit to consider the possibility that he might threaten others or himself. After the interrogation, they conferenced with the base commander, verify that he is not there to spy on the meeting, and decide to send him off post. He drives to Tucson, finds a hotel, then flies home, with a stop in Salt Lake City where his wife mentions Charlie Kirk. The man says he happened to be in the Salt Lake airport when Candace, i.e., Candace Owens, was discussing strange flights, and she mentions Charlie Kirk. He provides documentation: high school diploma, military records, police records, NDAs, and court documents he’s fought to obtain for this story spanning 35 years. He recalls the commander in charge of force protection, whom he could only identify as Captain Neff (about 36, brown hair, gray-haired man with glasses), and he notes an incident number given by the Captain: 8611-2025MPC446, which he believes could be FOIA-requested. He emphasizes that this is not just about one conspiracy but ties to global trafficking and cartels, including potential government involvement at high levels. He says he’s not hiding anymore and that Charlie Kirk’s assassination coverage ties into this larger narrative. He asks for anyone who saw something or knows how to FOIA-request the records to come forward, providing the dates, times, and documents he has shared. He ends by thanking God and noting his intent to pursue further exposure and potential meetings with others connected to the case.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Commander. Okay, so let's pause and just recap there very quickly. And I'm gonna tell you what this has to do with Charlie Kirk. Okay? So I guess in a sentence, a young military man did his job excellently. He accidentally stumbled upon the fact that our government was implicated not in fighting the cartels, but working with the cartels. And suddenly, he realizes after some time that the government then feeds him or somebody spitefully, perhaps his commander, fed him to the cartels, and now he's on the run for his life. What happens over the course of the next thirty five years is he's hacked. He says that he goes through abusive litigation. He is harassed. He says there are narco attorneys that attack his credits. There are he has police records, by the way, for all of this. He has presented evidence for this. But throughout a certain point in time, these police records were virtually disappeared. He had been reporting that hitmen were coming after him. He had names. This is a thirty five years long ordeal. He now has all of his paperwork, thanks to some county clerks who did the right thing and were able to dig up these records. But you name it, this man has lived it throughout the last thirty five years. Fast forward to May 2025, May, and Harry Myers, who now has a new name by the way, which I'm not saying, But he is finally released from this thirty five year military grade NDA. So what does this now 56 year old decide to do? He decides that he's going to confront his past. He wants answers. He wants to know why he was never protected. He wants to know if the FBI had been informed, and if so, which they were supposed to be, why they didn't do their job. Why didn't they protect Harry? He was working for the military, and he did his job. He makes up his mind that he's going to deal with this in person. He is going to travel from his home in Washington back down to the very base where this all began, right? To Fort Huachuca, pardon me, Huachuca in Arizona. He's gonna revisit the past. He's gonna get these answers. He books himself to stay in a hotel on the base, a military hotel known as Candlewood Suites. And this is on the evening of September 8. I want you to remember that, okay? He has been so thorough. He has sent me time stamps, bookings, reservations, went through his call logs. I was like, I want you to pinpoint when everything happened. So he gets to the Candlewood Suites at approximately, on September 8, 05:37PM. Checks into the hotel. You can imagine he's a person that pays a lot of attention to his surroundings. Right? When the cartels are after you and your family, and you are compelled to change your name, you pay attention to your surroundings to see if anybody looks shady. What he notices is somebody who is special forces in the lobby. He said, you just know when you're dealing with a special forces guy. And he is in the lobby and a person, a young woman, comes down thereafter. That young woman, who at the time he did not recognize, is with him. They kind of fluff around in the lobby while he's checking in. He's left alone with his wife. And thereafter, the two of them get into a green pickup truck, and they drive off. Okay. The next morning, now we're September 9, he wakes up at around 05:30AM in the morning because he wants to see the sunrise. He says that he then fails at finding the Army Criminal Investigations Department. So he drives off base, just a little ways off base, to get some coffee and Sierra Vista. While getting that coffee, he runs into some soldiers, again, this is just all God at this point, who happen to be wearing tenth Mountain Division patches. And he's like, that's my old unit. What's going on here? He thinks his unit's gone, nothing's going on with this unit for a long time, but it's been torn apart, I don't know what the military expression is for that. He strikes up a conversation with these young guys, and they tell him, oh, no, no, no. The old joint task force six is now being continued, and it's known as JTF, Joint Task Force Southern Border. Now for those of you who are like me who don't know literally what it sounds like, Joint Task Force, meaning you can get the Army, Navy, everybody kind of working together on something. And they're like, yeah, it's now JTF southern border. And they give him directions of how he can actually get to the new command center. They tell them that they're actually currently borrowing a building down there. And he tells me that there would have been no other way he would have discovered where it was. So his intention was to go to Army CID. Now he's like, wow, I can go directly to the actual JTF six, which is now being continued, and get some answers. What luck. It is now around 07:37AM when he enters the new or temporary JTF headquarters, And he sees two guys and he's pretty impressed. He's like, Woah, these are E4, E5s. He tells me that means that they're lieutenant colonels. And they are the ones that are checking him in. He happens to walk in at the exact time that they are concluding a meeting. And he is kind of even more impressed because he sees about 12 lieutenant colonels. He tells me, you do not see that many people, that many e fours, e fives, e sixes. Please military guys forgive me for me not knowing what the proper vernacular. But he just goes, what's going on? He's like, you don't see this unless you're at the Pentagon or you're at the White House. You just don't see this many high up the food chain, lieutenant colonels. He's going, man, this is a pretty important meeting. And then he sees three men walk out, one of which is the person he identifies as the person that's the center of the action. He said you could just tell this is the most important person. And he has gray hair, he's got glasses. I believe he said that he's about five'ten. And at this point, he sees that the person that is with him, and he is, he said, certain that the person that is with him is Brian Harpole. Yeah. Okay. Oh, it's about to get even more interesting. So, and again, I'm going to say allegedly because I wasn't there. But I have spoken to this guy and I very much trust what he is saying. I think he is very credible. So he sees Brian Harpole come out, this older guy, and what then happens is first the guys that are checking him in are friendly, he explains to them, yeah, this is what happened to me, I just want to speak to somebody. They're like, yeah, let me help you. Then all of a sudden after Brian, who he believes to be Brian Harpole, who he's not obviously recognized at that time, he would not have known that was Brian Harpole, he remembers him obviously because then the biggest political assassination since JFK happens, suddenly somebody hits the panic button. And two captains come out and they escort him out of the building and they begin what becomes a seven hour interrogation. They think he's a spy. How did you rumble this meeting? How did you know this meeting was taking place? He's being asked a bunch of questions. They're putting pressure on him. They're gaslighting him. I actually want to, if you give me a second, I want to read exactly what he messaged me about what took place. It's incredible. It's actually just incredible how he describes their strategy here of attempting to gaslight him into believing that he was a spy or that he was working for somebody. And he's like, no, I'm just here over an incident that happened 35 ago. I'm trying to get answers regarding it, and they're putting pressure on him. I'm going to write this verbatim. He says he's being interrogated. He is being accused of being a bomb threat because I was special forces in the military, EOD in the military. They then attempted to try to gaslight me to see if they could angle an accusation of me being a threat to others or myself. When all of that fell flat, they then conferenced with base commander After I assumed they verified that I was not there to spy on that particular meeting, they decided it was okay to send me off post. That's when I drove a Tucson, I got a room. The next morning I turned in my rental car, got on a plane back home, and I had to stop in Salt Lake. Upon landing and turning on the phone, my wife is telling me about Charlie Kirk. And again, this was just a coincidence. I happened to be in the airport at the time that you were talking about all of those strange flights that were taking place there. I did not notice anything helpful, other than the fact that the airport was not very crowded. So after seven hours, he explains to me that they were going to, they debated holding him for forty eight hours for this perceived perhaps maybe bomb threat spy thing that's happening. And he's thinking, can you imagine this, they're paranoid, but he's paranoid and thinking, oh my gosh, this is more like Sinaloa cartel stuff, and I'm being treated like this because I've wanted to speak out about this story for thirty five years. Both of them are wrong. Both of them are wrong. This really is just a coincidence. And adding to this coincidence is the fact that he got the commander's name. Obviously that questioned him for this long. He says this was the guy that was in charge, the commander. And he said he was approximately 36 years old. He had brown hair, the one I'm talking about that was leading the charge on asking him all the questions and interrogating him. And that his name was Captain Neff. I'm going Now, I have the same question that you have because I don't I've looked and it does seem that, and I never even questioned this, whether or not it's potential that Blake Neff has military connections as well. I guess that kind of like, I just thought this was a producer of Charlie Kirk's show. But it is interesting that somebody, and this would be a brother or cousin, I don't know, this is the person that interrogated him. And eventually, he says, was a person that had a heart and realized that he was not a part of any spy network, and eventually escorted him off of the base and onto his way. That's a lot of coincidence for me. Now he says to me, communicated this to me very clearly, he said, Candace, I know how these meetings work. These are the meetings that are had ahead of an operation. Like when an operation is being confirmed, you have these final meetings and they involve all the higher ups. And you are trying to do this in a very isolated location where people are not going to accidentally happen upon you because they've got something to say about what happened thirty five years ago. And that is what he happened upon. And I don't know what to make of this information, other than he feels that he then recognized these people. He feels certain that he recognized these people in the days following Charlie's Kirk's assassination. When a bunch of people are doing Fox News, and obviously then we've got a massive event at a stadium, and everybody is in front of the camera eulogizing him. He feels confident that he recognizes these people and that needs to be shared. He's willing to tell a story. Like I said, I have verified. He has sent me so many documents, everything from his high school graduation certificate, to his military documents, to the police records, to everything that he's speaking about that happened back then NDAs, judges, things that he's been in court with fighting, just to get out his story of what happened thirty five years ago when he did the right thing, when he stumbled upon. And boy, does he have some luck. Boy, does he have some luck that he goes from one government conspiracy to what he now believes he stumbled upon, which would be another government conspiracy. Okay? He said that this commander, Neff, by the way, was the commander of force protection. Best he could tell, he did not get the first name. He did get an incident number, which I should have had prepared for you, but I can find it here in our chat because he sent me that too. He said, there would have been no record for this if they didn't swarm me as if there was a bomb threat because now of course there is an actual incident report and he believes that this can be FOIA requested. And that report number, if you will bear with me, I'm going to read that to you all because I think this is going to take really the whole world to investigate. It is 8611Dash2025MPC446. So that is the report number that was given to him by this Captain Commander NEF. And like I said, he has given me every I could have just put up documents upon documents certifying that he was there, certifying that this happened. Whether or not his descriptions, and whether or not the people that he thinks he saw, he actually saw at this base, I don't know. What I will say is that something that I could easily have done was to see whether or not I asked him did you see Dan Flood? No, well that checks out because Dan Flood was with Charlie in Korea. And I am wondering about that. Why would you want to go to Japan a day before you have a college campus event? You have Charlie on the September, he is in Korea doing an event. And then on the seventh, he's in Japan, and he is on CNN News Japan speaking. And so yeah, on the eighth, if that's when he left, maybe he left on the ninth, you've got a twelve hour flight back home. And I have questions and somebody out there knows something. And I don't know what to say other than this feels right. This feels right to me. This feels to me as we were speaking about yesterday about global trafficking and cartels and the government involved in this somehow and implicated in this somehow in ways that we don't quite understand, but that we know involves the highest possible levels of corruption, that this feels right. And like I said, he is not hiding. He is done hiding. He has been silenced for thirty five years, running from his life and being gaslit about that. And the same way that I am being gaslit about that. And I have a very terrifying update for you regarding people that have been trying to assassinate me. And speaking to him was I guess emotionally qualifying because exactly what he's been going through, I've been going through, he didn't have the platform to be able to get his name out. And I said to him, do you want to come out? And he said, yeah, I've been silent for thirty five years. He said, I watch your stuff and I can't believe that you got this email. And I said to him, the chances of me seeing this were basically slim to none. And it was the first email that was in my box and I just called you. And I feel God moving in that. And despite the I mean, just the utterly demonic and satanic action and the level of collusion that had to take place for 09:10 to happen. I do also know, as I have always known spiritually, that they wouldn't get away with it. And I think Charlie, whatever vision he had in which he knew his life would be short and which he knew that I would not let this go because I somehow feel tied to it and we're seeing more and more every day, that's somehow I am tied to this. I think that this is God operating. I really do. I think Bless this man. Thank you so much for your service to this country. I know that he wants to, he said he would love to meet Ian Carroll and I guess he's watching his stuff and I will obviously make that happen and much more in the coming days. I don't expect the Feds to reach out. I don't expect them to be interested in this angle or this potential meeting that I think they probably already knew about. I do hope though that somebody else saw something and somebody knows the quickest way to FOIA request that stuff. Somebody knows how to get behind this so we can get information. I've given you the dates. I've given you the times. He has given so much more. I know I just thank God that I saw that email. We're gonna pause there. And if you guys know anything,
BasedSamParker
Posted - December 19, 2025 at 8:27 PM
Saved - December 25, 2025 at 8:35 AM

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

BREAKING, MUST WATCH: Frank Turek said he was FaceTiming his family when Charlie Kirk was k*lled, but was he actually watching secret drone surveillance instead? IMO, I think he might have been—and ironically, it's the alleged arm signal from Dan Flood that could prove it: https://t.co/RaJlsJ5zAi

Video Transcript AI Summary
The transcript presents a video analysis centered on Frank Turek during an event with Charlie, focusing on whether Frank was FaceTiming his wife and son/daughter-in-law or viewing drone surveillance footage. The speaker asserts that Frank, initially seen on the left of Charlie and later to Charlie’s right, was FaceTiming someone but then shifted to viewing surveillance footage, likely from a drone, rather than the FaceTime call. Key claims and sequence: - The narrator describes Frank standing to Charlie’s right behind him, holding a phone, and initially FaceTiming someone while Charlie sits and asks questions. The claim is that Frank’s FaceTime feed shows a woman and a picture-in-picture frame, suggesting FaceTiming with someone. - The speaker contends that the phone Frank is using for the FaceTime appears different from the phone he uses to view drone footage, noting discrepancies in phone appearance (dimensions, front/back features, button color). - The analysis shifts to allegedly showing that Frank’s phone screen is displaying drone surveillance footage rather than faces. The speaker points to frames where objects on the screen resemble a car, trees, a building with a spire or fountain, and a golf cart, arguing these are not faces or reflections. - A key part of the argument is a claimed cross-angle discrepancy: Dan Flood’s tattooed arm appears on Frank’s phone screen at angles inconsistent with the real arm’s orientation, implying the feed is from a different camera angle than Frank’s own position. The speaker argues this mismatch indicates a surveillance feed, possibly from a drone, rather than a direct FaceTime view of a person. - The footage sequence allegedly shows movement synchronized between Frank’s phone screen and what’s happening off-screen, including observations of an arm, two legs, and later a moment that might depict Charlie tipping over after an incident. - The presenter points out a potential visual link between a tire/hubcap and a vehicle seen earlier on Frank’s phone, inviting viewers to compare frames and decide if they are the same. - The speaker invites the audience to review the footage themselves, proposes that Frank was not FaceTiming anyone, and suggests that he may have switched to drone footage. They emphasize that this is a theory that should be investigated and encourage downloading the footage to form a conclusion. - Acknowledgment is given to Indi Rose of the Let Me Stop You There podcast, whose analysis influenced the video, with an invitation to followers to review her work and compare viewpoints. Overall, the transcript details a contested interpretation: whether Frank used FaceTime as claimed or was viewing drone surveillance footage, with emphasis on frame-by-frame inconsistencies, angle mismatches, and the appearance of drone imagery on Frank’s screen, culminating in a call for independent review of the footage.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hey, everybody. You remember Frank Turrick who was standing to the right of Charlie and slightly behind him wearing the white hat, holding up his phone, allegedly FaceTiming his wife, his son and daughter-in-law right before Charlie was killed? I don't think that's what he was doing. In fact, I think he was monitoring drone surveillance footage, and I can prove it, allegedly. Let's get into it. Speaker 1: Anyway, on our way in, we had drone footage of the crowd building, and Charlie had it on his phone. I said, Charlie, I don't like this place. There are too many buildings. Speaker 0: So did you catch that? He said that Charlie was watching drone footage on his phone in his hand, and he puts his hand out and makes like Charlie was looking at the drone footage on his phone. So we know they had the capability of looking at drone footage on their phones. Speaker 1: I mean, they just love Charlie. So I start FaceTiming my wife and say, look at this. This is incredible. Then I start FaceTiming my son and my daughter-in-law while Charlie sits down and begins to ask questions. Speaker 0: Here you can see Frank over on Charlie's left side, and you can actually, if you look closely, you can see that he is on FaceTime. We'll zoom in here and we'll see a woman in the screen, and then we'll see the picture in picture frame of the phone camera feed in the lower right corner. So earlier on, he was actually FaceTiming somebody, and we can see that. But then he moves to the other side, to Charlie's right side behind Charlie. Speaker 1: Now this is where you may have seen an Internet conspiracy. The man in the white hat was was giving signals to the shooter. Yeah. The man in the white hat was me. Okay? I did this with my hat. Maybe I touched my nose or something while I'm holding my phone because I'm FaceTiming my son and daughter-in-law, And they're huge Charlie fans, so I'm I'm maybe 30 feet from Charlie. I'm right off his right elbow. I'm I'm standing probably just off camera if the camera's going forward, on him. Speaker 0: So they're big Charlie fans, and he's filming Charlie for the FaceTime. Right? Wrong. Look at his phone. It's not pointed at Charlie, and there's no faces in the phone. Now contrary to popular opinion, this is not a black screen or a blank screen or even a reflection. No. I'm gonna show you that he's actually getting video surveillance from what I believe is a drone, perhaps even a set of drones, and I'm gonna show you that now. It also occurs to me as I compare the two phones, I'm not even sure it's the same phone. So on the left, that's the phone he was FaceTiming with. On the right is the one where he's looking at what I think is drone surveillance footage. We're going look at that. But look at these two phones, and tell me if I'm just seeing things, but they don't quite look like the same phone. The one on the left looks a little thicker than the one on the right, and they look maybe like they might be slightly different dimensions. And the button on the phone on the right is all black, and then you have these silver looking buttons on the phone on the left, I'm not a 100% positive these are even the same phone. What do you guys think? Alright. Let's get back into it. So let's just start advancing it. So I'm gonna zoom in here. You see that? That is the front of a pickup truck that's behind them out in the parking lot. So there's the pickup truck that I'm talking about in the background. When they were walking in, you can see this white Chevy with a black grill. Okay. Look. Notice the molding and the patterning in Frank's phone and then on this pickup truck. I think that's what that is. I think that's at the front of that pickup truck. I think there's a drone flying around. Now let's just advance. Let's just advance a little bit. Let's take it frame by frame and look carefully at what's on the phone screen. Look at that. You see that? That's a car. That's a car. You can see its windows, the outline of the body, and then you can also see it looks like maybe some green trees above it. And then some, I don't know, blue or something. That looks like looks to be like a building with a spire on top or perhaps a fountain or something. You see that? So here I've pointed out those things so you can see what I'm referring to. I don't know. Maybe you see something else. I'm not sure what I'm seeing, but this is not a reflection, and it's not something in the crowd either. This is these are images. These are something else. Then this looks like it could be one of the golf carts perhaps out behind with the cloth top and the seats. You see that? See the rounded seat and the cloth top? Let's check that out. Let's take a look at these golf carts. So remember the golf carts that are out back there by the pickup truck? Well, the next image we have after the pickup truck is this thing that maybe looks like the seats and the cloth from the this golf cart. That's what I think it might be. There's a round hole, something there. I don't know what that is. See, there's no faces. Things are happening on his screen. Right? And then we have something here. Not sure what that is. It almost looks like a wheel well. See that flat curved surface? It's white and then the dark black curved surface underneath it. I'm not sure what that is. See, there's images rapidly moving on on his phone. Now he's not moving his phone. See these are not reflections. Okay? This is something happening on his phone screen. Okay. Now this is the part where I think this proves he's looking at surveillance footage from a drone. Because you're going see Danflend's arm here begin to move, and you're going to see his arm move on the screen as well. But here's the key. See that? That's his that's his arm. I think that's his arm and tattoo ink, but from an obvious different angle. That's from a different angle because Frank's phone is not pointed at Dan Flood's arm right there with the tattoo on it. Yet, he's it's showing up on his bone in perfect synchronously. Look at this. See? That's tattooing from a different angle, a different surface on Dan Flood's arm. Furthermore, you can even see the bracelet that's on Dan Flood's wrist, but it's at the wrong angle. The angle that it's showing up on Frank's phone is wrong for how his arm is laid out in relationship to the phone. Frank is getting a video feed from a different angle of Dan Flood's arm right here. Where is it coming from? From this angle, you can see that the inside of Dan Flood's arm is actually more heavily tattooed than the outside. Here's another shot from a different angle. It's a little more blurry, but you can get the point that it's more ink on the inside of his arm than on the outside of his arm, which is what we see here through Frank's phone juxtaposed against the outside of Dan's arm. This is where I think this proves that Frank Turk is seeing footage from some other camera, which I submit is probably a drone. You can see look at that. See that? You can see it happening in his phone screen. And you can see Dan Flood's arm moving, but they're from obvious different angles. Now, let's keep going. You see that? Now I'll get this next image. Right here. That's somebody's arm with a hand at the end of it. See that? That's an arm with a hand. And if we keep going, you can see that arm. It's almost like somebody's walking or standing. You see the see their two legs right here? Two legs right there, you can see the light in between them. It's a view of somebody with their arm and two legs walking or swaying back and forth or something. Then we get to the point where we get the two two white dots of light. And this is interesting because this looks like a wheel. I'm not sure exactly what that is. And now I think we're getting maybe right here, perhaps a view of Charlie tipping over. He's just been shot or killed or something's happened. And now, boom. Right there. Something white with sunlight shining on it. That might be Charlie. And now Frank is gonna take a dive and we'll see everything happen. Now let's watch the whole thing in sequence in real time. And you be the judge. You tell me what you see. Speaker 1: I'm gonna give you I'm gonna give you some credit. Do know how many mass shooters there have been in America over the last ten years? Counting or not counting gang violence. Great. Speaker 0: You see this tire, my friends? Is this the same tire, hubcap, and car body that we maybe saw on Frank's phone just a few seconds prior? What do you think? Speaker 1: Now Speaker 0: let's watch that phone sequence one more time at half speed. Speaker 1: In the last ten years. How soon you're not counting game violence? Great. Speaker 0: I'd like to thank Indi Rose of the Let Me Stop You There podcast who first put me onto this. She's done her own extensive analysis of this video sequence on Frank Turek's phone. So I encourage you to go to her page, follow her, and watch her video analysis, and see where we differ. There you have it, my friends. I don't think Frank Turek was FaceTiming anybody. I think he was, and then I think he switched over to that drone footage. Perhaps it was the same feed that Charlie was using when they were first driving up. I don't know. I'm not accusing him of anything, and maybe I'm wrong. This is a possibility. This is a theory that I think needs to be looked into, so I encourage you to download the footage and look at it for yourself, and let's figure out what's going on here.
HustleBitch_
Posted - March 16, 2026 at 2:08 PM
Saved - March 16, 2026 at 3:10 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I summarize a video from Bee Better claiming politics are run by a closed billionaire donor elite. It ties Erica Franz Faye to Charlie Kirk, alleging donors groomed Charlie for the presidency and Erica managed donor dinners behind the scenes. It says 2024 panic about his foreign-policy drift; the night before, Erica said he left, he texted “feels like it’s over.” Within 72 hours: VanceKirk2028 domain, Erica became TPUSA CEO, she forgave the shooter, joined the Air Force Academy Board. The author suggests a hidden donor system explains it.

@HustleBitch_ - HustleBitch

🚨 BILLIONAIRE’S SON BLOWS OPEN CHARLIE KIRK ASSASSINATION — ACCUSES ERICA KIRK OF KNOWING EXACTLY WHY — “I MIGHT GET DELETED FOR THIS” "Nobody in the history of political assassinations has ever acted as bizarre as Erica Kirk." The man behind Bee Better, who says he grew up around billionaire donor circles, just posted a video claiming politics is actually run by a closed billionaire donor hierarchy. According to him: • Billionaires choose who rises long before voters ever see them • Presidents are basically the student-council president of the system Then he connects that world to Charlie and Erica Kirk. • Erica Franz Faye met Charlie at Turning Point USA in Phoenix in 2018 • Charlie flew her to New York for a job interview, then decided to date her • Donors were openly talking about Charlie as a future presidential candidate • Erica allegedly ran the donor dinners and billionaire relationships behind the scenes He claims donors panicked in 2024 when Charlie allegedly began drifting away from their foreign-policy priorities. According to the story he tells, pressure inside the marriage escalated. The night before everything happened: • Erica said Charlie left around 2:30 AM to sleep in another room • Charlie reportedly texted a friend: “It feels like it’s over.” Then the timeline he points to: Within 72 HOURS of Charlie Kirk's assassination: • The domain http://VanceKirk2028.com was registered • Erica became CEO of Turning Point USA • She publicly forgave the alleged shooter almost immediately • She later took Charlie’s former seat on the U.S. Air Force Academy Board of Visitors "The only reason she's not demanding answers is because she knows exactly who did it and why." The man claims once you understand how billionaire donor networks operate… “the entire story suddenly makes sense.” “I might get deleted for posting this.” Look closely at the timeline... what doesn’t add up to you?

Meowllian
Posted - September 20, 2025 at 4:49 AM
Saved - September 24, 2025 at 3:47 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’ve been exploring the connections within TPUSA's security and its affiliations. Greg Shaffer, founder of Shaffer Security Group and former TPUSA security head, frequently discusses Islamic terror threats and pro-Israel views. His brother, Ben Shaffer, is seen in a notable photo with Erik Prince and is involved in private security. Leif Babin, co-founder of Echelon Front, has ties to influential defense policy groups. Additionally, Congressman Brian Babin, Leif's father, is active in promoting Israel defense funding and has close ties to Trump.

@Meowllian - 𝕄𝕖𝕠𝕨𝕝𝕝𝕚𝕠𝕟

🔻🔻TPUSA Security 🔻🔻 Dan Flood - Head of Security Shaffer Security Group Echelon Front ▪️Greg Shaffer — founder Shaffer Security Group, FBI 20 years, used to do security for TPUSA until 2022. However, this same Shaffer security can be seen at UVU. Greg posts frequently about Islamic terror threats and pro Israel propaganda. ▪️Ben Shaffer — Greg Shaffer’s brother. Ben is to the right of Trump in the famous July 13 Butler photo. In the video below, Ben is the man in the middle sitting next to Erik Prince (Blackwater) speaking on working private security. ▪️Leif Babin — co-founder of Echelon Front, along with John Willink (Jocko Media), David Berke, Leif Babin, Codey Gandy, Steve Ward. Greg Shaffer, Willink, Babin & David Flood (Head of Security TPUSA) can be seen below in front of Echelon Front logo. Leif Babin is closely connected to JINSA (Jewish Institute of National Security of America) NY Cabinet, a powerful think tank on US Israel Defense Policy. ▪️Brian Babin (Congressman TX 36) — Leif Babin’s father is Chairman of the House Science, Space and Technology Committee and member of the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure. —> On Sept 10th, Babin attended the US Chamber of Commerce’s Global Aerospace Summit (Sept 9 - 11) —> Babin is very close to Trump & heavily involved with all Congressional Bills pushing Israel Defense funding - OBBB AI Technocratic Surveillance - Aeronautics- OBBB - Weather Authorization Act 2025, Border Policy / Alligator Alcatraz —> Brian Babin seen in pic below celebrating the passing of the OBBB standing in front of a painting in the White House depicting events transpired at Butler. Ben Shaffer is the Black shirt guy in CKs security detail (to the right of CK) was also at Butler (seen in sunglasses to the right of Trump).

Video Transcript AI Summary
Performance in both Iraq and Afghanistan. I've provided security services to the president of The United States and other high ranking members in the United States government. I've protected diplomatic persons, high net worth corporate clients, media personalities, investigative journalists, and the general public. I continue that work today as a SWAT team leader and executive protection specialist. I've been recognized on numerous occasions for my high level professionalism, proficiency, and knowledge of all security measures while working in those fields. As I analyze what happened and
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Performance in both Iraq and Afghanistan. I've provided security services to the president of The United States and other high ranking members in the United States government. I've protected diplomatic persons, high net worth corporate clients, media personalities, investigative journalists, and the general public. I continue that work today as a SWAT team leader and executive protection specialist. I've been recognized on numerous occasions for my high level professionalism, proficiency, and knowledge of all security measures while working in those fields. As I analyze what happened and

@Meowllian - 𝕄𝕖𝕠𝕨𝕝𝕝𝕚𝕠𝕟

SHAFFER SECURITY GROUP — TPUSA Security Firm ▪️Greg Shaffer - CEO - FBI 20 years ECHELON FRONT ▪️Leif Babin - co-founder - US Navy Seals —> closely connected to JINSA NY Cabinet JINSA — Jewish Institute for National Security of America ▪️policy think tank focused on US - Israel Defense & National Security issues in the Middle East. ▪️Michael Makovsky PhD - CEO —> worked extensively on US Israel defense ties & US policy towards Syria, Iraq, Gaza, and Middle East. —> Former Foreign Policy Director for Bipartisan Policy Center —> Former Special Assistant in Office of Secretary of Defense —> close to Yahoo

@deepwebslinger - DeepWebSlinger

How about a little background on Charlie Kirk's security company and who they're really associated with. ✡️

View Full Interactive Feed