reSee.it - Related Post Feed

Saved - August 2, 2025 at 10:41 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I recently explored Tucker Carlson's past, revealing his involvement in Nicaragua during the 1980s. Uncovered recordings and a 2005 interview show he aimed to support the anti-Sandinista side. College newsletters indicate he visited Nicaragua multiple times. Notably, this was during a period when his father led a media group pushing for regime change in Nicaragua. Carlson has openly acknowledged his privileged upbringing and has criticized figures like Bill O'Reilly for their inauthentic personas, despite later adopting a similar approach himself.

@AlanRMacLeod - Alan MacLeod

[Thread] New from me. Did Tucker Carlson really fight for the Contras in Nicaragua in the 1980s? Newly uncovered recordings suggest that he might have. Read my new @MintPressNews article on Tucker’s background here. https://www.mintpressnews.com/tucker-carlson-biography-nicaragua-cia/279782/

Tucker Carlson: The Elite Pedigree of a Brilliant Cosplaying “Populist” Alan Macleod reveals populist firebrand Tucker Carlson's to the CIA and multiple trips to Nicaragua as a "freedom-fighter" with the Contras. mintpressnews.com

@AlanRMacLeod - Alan MacLeod

In an unaired interview from 2005, Carlson reveals that he went to Nicaragua in the 1980s to, in his own words, “get involved in the war and support the side that was right, which was not the Sandinista side.” A 2017 interview confirms as much. https://t.co/7AgE0425h8

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 and his roommate went to Nicaragua the summer after freshman year to get involved in the war and support the side opposing the Sandinistas. They spent the summer trying to understand the war, and "all kinds of hilarity ensued."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And so the, summer after my freshman year, my roommate and I decided to go, down to Nicaragua for the summer and work and, you know, get involved in the war, you know, and support the side that we thought was right, which not the San Anista side. And Speaker 1: know that you were actually a freedom fighter, who traveled down to Central America to fight with the Contras. Will you fill them in on that story? No. Speaker 0: We spent the summer in Nicaragua trying to get a sense of the war there, and all kinds of hilarity ensued. But I love

@AlanRMacLeod - Alan MacLeod

An old newsletter from his college reveals that he went to Nicaragua on at least two occasions. https://t.co/t9V94LvBII

@AlanRMacLeod - Alan MacLeod

This was all at a time when Tucker’s dad was head of CIA cutout media group Voice of America, who were waging a relentless propaganda war against Nicaragua in an effort to bring about regime change. Here is Mr Carlson speaking about his role in bringing down communist countries. https://t.co/cjCHXBW7AZ

Video Transcript AI Summary
International broadcasting played a critical role in the USSR and Eastern Europe. Information poured across borders from Beijing to Budapest to Warsaw to Vilnius. News that millions stood up to oppressors helped others sweep oppressors away. International broadcasters were equally important in laying the groundwork for democratic revolutions. Eastern Europeans sound Western in talking about freedom, democracy, free enterprise, and environmental concerns. They got these ideas mainly from international broadcasters like Voice of America, BBC, Radio Liberty, and Radio Free Europe, not from their own media or textbooks.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I think we would all agree that international broadcasting played a very critical role as was suggested by mister Murdoch in the events that took place in The USSR and Eastern Europe over the last couple of years. From Beijing to Budapest to Warsaw to Vilnius, information poured across borders, and news that millions of people had stood up to their oppressors helped millions of others sweep those oppressors away. I also believe that international broadcasters were equally important in laying the groundwork for the democratic revolutions that we have seen. Isn't it incredible how western all of those Eastern Europeans sound in talking about freedom, democracy, free enterprise, environmental concerns. And they didn't get, those ideas from their own media or from textbooks in their countries. They got them mainly from international broadcasters like Voice of America, BBC, Radio Liberty, Radio Free Europe.

@AlanRMacLeod - Alan MacLeod

Tucker grew up “extraordinarily loaded just from money I inherited from a number of trust funds” and was a bowtie-wearing “out-of-the-closet-elitist” in his own words; “I don’t run around pretending to be a man of the people; I’m absolutely not a man of the people, at all.” https://t.co/WKXE81nC5i

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker states they are "extraordinarily loaded" due to inherited money from multiple trust funds, including the "Swanson deal." They claim never to have needed to work and that their involvement with cable news was merely a "phase." The speaker admits to being an "elitist" and an "asshole," but clarifies they are an "out of the closet elitist" who doesn't pretend to be a "man of the people."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, I'm, like, extraordinarily loaded just from, like, money I, you know, inherited from my number of trust funds. From the Swanson deal? From the Yeah. Totally. From the Swanson deal? Yeah. I'll go out and beat some servants. I'll wrap my Lamborghini around a tree, go pick up a kilo or two. You know, just like normal stuff like that. You're just living you're a trust fund baby, are you not? No. Completely. I've never needed to work. Yeah. I mean, it's all just the whole cable news thing was just a total toad. It was just it was like a phase I was going through. You're about the most unordinary person I know. You're an elitist. You're an asshole. Yeah. I don't know. I'm a but, see, I'm an out of the closet elitist. I don't run around pretending to be a man of the people. I'm absolutely not a man of the people at all.

@AlanRMacLeod - Alan MacLeod

He used to rail against Bill O’Reilly and his fake everyman schtick. Check out this incredible clip from 2003 where he talks about how fake O’Reilly’s conservative populist persona is. Yet years later, he would adopt this exact same character. https://t.co/UPFx3sZilE

Video Transcript AI Summary
Bill O'Reilly's success depends on the perception that he is who he claims to be. He is seen as an Irish Catholic populist fighting for the common person against the elite. However, there's a deep phoniness at the center of his persona. The moment this persona is revealed to be false, it's over. If he gets caught behaving like a stereotypical wealthy, demanding celebrity, such as slapping a flight attendant or making unreasonable demands of his staff, it would be devastating. His entire image is predicated on the idea that he is a regular person, which is impossible for someone making millions of dollars a year.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Bill O'Reilly's success is built on the perception that he really is who he claims to be. If he ever gets caught out of character, it's over. Speaker 1: That's right. I I I say before that that, know, Bill O'Reilly's really talented. He's more talented than I am. You know, he's got a lot more viewers than I do. He's a better communicator than I am. But I think there's kind of a deep phoniness at the center of his shtick. And again, as I say, the shtick is sort of built on this perception that he is the character he plays. He is every man. This kind of he's not right wing. He's a populist. This kind of Irish Catholic populist fighting for you against the powers that be. And that's great as a shtick, but I'm just saying the moment that it's revealed not to be true, it's over. The moment he gets caught, you know, slapping a flight attendant on the Concorde for not bringing his champagne fast enough or barking at, you know, one of his subordinates to take the, you know, brown M and M's out of my bowl and get me a bottle of Evian or something like it. The second that makes page six, it's over. Right? Because the whole thing is predicated on the fact that he is who he says he is. And just nobody is that person, especially not someone makes a million dollars, you know, many millions a year.
Saved - January 17, 2024 at 9:54 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Former Trump adviser Steve Bannon has been arrested and charged with fraud over a fundraising campaign for the US-Mexico border wall. He and three others allegedly defrauded donors of $25m. Bannon, a key architect of Trump's 2016 election victory, entered a not guilty plea. This incident highlights the presence of enemies surrounding Trump and raises questions about the motives of those claiming to fight for the country's freedom. The information about Bannon's ties to Israel and 9/11 suggests a deeper agenda. Trump distancing himself from his past administration is seen as a move against the Deep State.

@Prolotario1 - Ariel

How did we forget about this story? Former Trump adviser Steve Bannon has been arrested and charged with fraud over a fundraising campaign to build a wall on the US-Mexico border. Mr Bannon and three others defrauded hundreds of thousands of donors in connection with the "We Build the Wall" campaign, which raised $25m (£19m), the US Department of Justice (DoJ) said. Mr Bannon received more than $1m, at least some of which he used to cover personal expenses, it alleged. In court, he entered a not guilty plea. Mr Bannon, who has been released on bail, was a key architect of Donald Trump's 2016 presidential election victory. His right-wing anti-immigration ideology fuelled Mr Trump's "America First" campaign.https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-53853297 Do you all remember when @Realdefender45 was invited to be on this program? Do you all remember how excited she was? Do you now see she could care less about who she socializes with? How are all these "Plastic Pay-triots" communing with the enemies of Donald Trump and say they are fighting for the freedom of this country? Do you now see how many enemies were/are surrounding D. Trump? Now do you see why I uploaded that information about Andrew Breibart & Steve Bannon who started their news business in Israel with the same Zionist Benjamin Netanyahu who was behind 9/11? Ask yourself why are you not getting this info from these Plastic Pay-triots? Why do some want to be famous so bad where they are willing to risk their reputation just to say hey' I was on the WR with S. Bannon. People you have to understand why Donald Trump is no longer associating with people from his past administration. They are Deep State. But they want to convince you they are not in this for money, fame, and ego. The linktrees on their profile should tell you everything. I would have never thought someone would stoop that low who call themselves Realdefender45. How when you do not care if someone is working against your freedom that has ties to the very man who tried to take them? People, no one has any real info on me. This is why they avoid attacking the info but instead want to come after me personally. Now you see through the facade. Now you see through the smile. Now you see through the fake patriotism.

Steve Bannon charged with fraud over Mexico wall funds Ex-Trump adviser Steve Bannon is charged with fraud over fundraising to build a Mexican border wall. bbc.com
Saved - November 1, 2024 at 9:00 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
At the Trump rally in Madison Square Garden, I expressed my belief that Trump will win because he resonates with people who feel despised by the elite. I highlighted how Trump has freed us from the obligation to lie, allowing us to speak the truth about our leaders and their failures. I criticized figures like Liz Cheney and Kamala Harris, arguing they lack merit and have benefited from a flawed system. Trump empowers us to reject the narrative that we are lesser than those in power. I thanked him for this liberation and the freedom to speak honestly.

@TheFinalBot1 - Indy Cat 2000

👀 Tucker Carlson Epic Populist Rant at Trump Rally @ Madison Square Garden — Full 9 min “Donald Trump is going to win? Why is he going to win? The people he’s about to defeat have no idea! “Their first theory - Trump is evil so half the country’s evil also. They spent the last 4 years trying to destroy the country because they hate the people who voted for Donald Trump. “If they paused for 20 seconds to ask themselves why, they’d see the people like Trump because he likes them. And it’s real, it can’t be faked. “People know in a country that’s been taken over by a leadership class that actually despises them and their values and their history, their culture and their customs, really hates them. “The second reason ppl love Trump? And it’s why I’m here today — he’s liberated us from the obligation to tell lies. Made it possible for us to tell the truth about the world around us. If you want to enslave and degrade ppl, force them to tell lies. “And they have — they’ve forced us to lie about everything. And not just the obvious lies that men can become women or that Putin blew up the Nordstream Pipeline or that Jan 6 was an insurrection.. but the big lie. “The Big Lie is that they’re impressive — that the ‘people in charge’ have earned the right to rule over you, and they haven’t and you know that. They’re useless, have no skill, and they have 3/4ths of the money and they didn’t earn it! “They set up a system with the purpose of awarding themselves wealth and power when it’s undeserved.” (wow — Tucker is calling for meritocracy in the aristocracy). “Look at Liz Cheney — honestly, what skill could she possibly have that allowed her to send hundreds of thousands of people to their deaths? “No fair system would make Liz Cheney powerful. No fair system would make Larry Fink rich! No fair system would elevate someone like Kamala Harris to a presidential nomination. “She has never been accused of doing anything useful. She has precisely no achievements, she’s the nominee without getting a single vote. “She is a metaphor for the system they created to make themselves rich and powerful. Then they have the gall to lecture you - the people who can change a flat tire, have useful jobs, pay your taxes, and work 40 hours a week - lecture YOU that you are somehow immoral. “Trump has empowered us to call BS on the charade: ‘No, you are not better than us. No, you are not smarter than us! No you do not deserve what you have, you probably stole it. No you’re not going to bully me into silence anymore.’ “And I can promise you this, 9 days out when Robert Kennedy Jr. and Elon Musk and Tulsi Gabbard and everyone comes out for Donald Trump - when everyone realizes there’s nothing embarrassing about this — “What’s embarrassing is to take a perfectly great country and destroy it! As they have! We’re not ashamed, they should be. After 9 years of listening to their lies — no it’s not safe and effective, and no she’s not impressive. “That is Liberation - the Freedom to say what’s obviously True as a free man and not a slave. And I just wanna say thank you Donald Trump for that!” — @TuckerCarlson #MAGA

Video Transcript AI Summary
It’s an honor to be here, reflecting on Donald Trump’s return to New York City, where he faces opposition from the leadership that once celebrated him. Despite attempts to undermine him, Trump remains popular because he genuinely cares for his supporters. People appreciate his authenticity, especially in a political landscape filled with dishonesty. Trump has liberated many by allowing them to speak the truth, challenging the narrative that those in power are deserving of their positions. The current leadership, often seen as ineffective and disconnected, has created a system that rewards the undeserving. As more people recognize the absurdity of the status quo, they feel empowered to reject the lies and stand with Trump. This liberation is about embracing the truth and rejecting the false narratives imposed by the elite. Thank you, Donald Trump, for that freedom.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Thank you. I'm I saw the Grateful Dead in this arena in 1987. I was seated right there. How weird. It's it's so it's such an honor to be here, and it's wild. Just another day following Bobby Kennedy junior at a Donald Trump rally in Madison Square Garden. That's totally normal. Liz Cheney's out there with Kamala Harris, and there's Bobby Kennedy calling to protect women's sports at a Trump rally. It's a realignment. It's unbelievable, and it the fact that it's here is even sweeter. Imagine if you're and just pause for one moment. Imagine you're Donald Trump. You're from New York City. You become famous in New York City. You make your fortune in New York City, and all of a sudden, the leadership of New York City decides they're gonna destroy you because they don't like your politics. And so they yeah, boo. Imagine if that were you, though. And they try and take everything that you have. They try and put you in prison. They try and put your children in prison. If that happened to you, how often do you think you'd be going back to New York City? How about never? And yet he's here. It's like getting thrown out of a bar. And you think to yourself, well, you know, all my friends are in the bar. And you approach the door, and there's the bouncer, like, you're not allowed in here. But from behind the bouncer, you hear the cheers of your friend, come on in. And the bouncer hangs his head in shame. He's embarrassed that he's working for the man trying to keep the most popular person out of the bar, and that's Donald Trump back in the city that produced him with no embarrassment at all in a room full of his friends. The stones that takes, the bravery that takes is incredible. Donald Trump's gonna win. He's gonna win. I know that that's true. Why is Donald Trump gonna win? The people he's about to defeat have no idea, and they're panicked. They have no idea why people like Donald Trump. And their first theory was, well, Donald Trump is evil, so half the country's evil also. And that's one of the reasons they spent the last 4 years trying to destroy the country because they're mad at its voters for liking Donald Trump. How much easier would it have been just to pause for 20 minutes and ask yourself honestly in some silent place, why do people like Donald Trump? And if they had been honest enough to ask themselves that question, they would have come up with the 2 main reasons, and here what they here's what they are. The first reason that people like Donald Trump is because he likes them. That's why. And it's real. Affection is something you can't fake. I don't care how many times Kamala Harris would tell me she loves me. I don't believe her. I saw her kiss her husband with a mask on. A mask on. Her version of 10 years telling you Trump is a hater. Do you feel that on him? No. You don't. Because it's not there. I've spent a lot of time with Trump, and there's not one moment I've ever been with him off camera where he's spending his time grousing about people he hates, ever. He's talking about the people and the country he loves in his private time. Trust me. And people know in a country that's been taken over by a leadership class that actually despises them and their values and their history and their culture and their customs really hates them to the point that it's trying to replace them. They know someone who actually has affection for them, and that's Donald Trump. And it's requited. It's requited. They know. When he goes to McDonald's and serves fries, like, he's not faking that at all. That's why that worked. Democratic media consultants are like, how how is that working? Because it's real. That's why. And the second reason that people love Trump, and I put myself in this category, it's why I'm here today, is because he's liberated us in the deepest and truest sense, and the liberation he has brought to us is the liberation from the obligation to tell lies. Donald Trump has made it possible for the rest of us to tell the truth about the world around us, and that's the single most liberating thing you can do for people. If you want to enslave people, if you want to degrade them, force them to tell lies, and they have. They force us to lie about everything at gunpoint effectively. They put people in prison for refusing to lie. And not just the obvious lies that men can become women or Vladimir Putin blew up the Nord Stream pipeline. No. Honestly, he did. January 6th was an insurrection. They were unarmed, but it was very. Not even the obvious ones, but the big lie. You know what the big lie is? The big lie is that they're impressive. That's what the big lie is. That the people in charge have somehow earned the right to rule over you, and they haven't, and you know that. These are the single most useless people in the United States. They have no skills whatsoever. They've got 3 quarters of the money, and they didn't earn it. They set up a system precisely for the purpose of awarding themselves wealth and power when it's undeserved. You look at Liz Cheney and you ask yourself honestly, what skill could she possibly have that allowed her to send 100 of thousands of people to their deaths? Did she earn that? I don't think she did. No fair system would make Liz Cheney powerful. No fair system would make Larry Fink rich. No fair system would elevate someone like Kamala Harris to a presidential nomination. She's never been accused of doing anything useful. She has precisely no achievements. She's a nominee without getting a single vote. She is a metaphor for the system they created to make themselves rich and powerful, and then they have the gall to lecture you, the people who can actually change a flat tire and repair a power grid, who have useful jobs, who pay your taxes and work 40 hours a week, lecture you that you are somehow immoral. And Donald Trump has empowered the rest of us through mostly just sticking around in the face of their hate and abuse and persecution. He has given the rest of us the right to call BS on the charade. No. You are not better than us. No. You are not smarter than us. No. You do not deserve what you have. You probably stole it. No. You're not gonna bully me into silence anymore. And I can promise you at this point, 9 days out when Robert f Kennedy junior and Elon Musk and Tulsi Gabbard and pretty much every high school senior and college shorty girl in the country has come out finally saying, yeah, I am for Donald Trump, actually. When the entire country has realized there is nothing embarrassing about this, what's embarrassing is to take a perfectly great country and destroy it as they have. I'm not ashamed. You should be. At that moment, it's gonna be pretty tough for them. 10 days from now to look in the eye to America with a straight face, it's gonna be pretty hard to look at us and say, you know what? Kamala Harris, she's just she got 85,000,000 votes because she's just so impressive. As the first Samoan Malaysian low IQ former California prosecutor ever to be elected president. It was just a groundswell of popular support. And anyone who thinks otherwise is just a freak or a criminal. At this stage of the game, after 9 years of listening to their lies and finding every single one of them totally false. No. It's not safe and effective, and no. She's not impressive. It's very hard for me to believe the rest of us are gonna say, you know what, Joe Scarborough? You're right. You're right. She won fair and square because she's just so impressive. I don't think so. And to me, that is liberation. It's the freedom to say what's obviously true as a free man and not a slave. And I just wanna say thank you, Donald Trump, for that.
Saved - January 14, 2025 at 2:16 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe being an honest and caring person matters more than spreading falsehoods to discredit someone, especially when that person has endured significant hardships and has the ability to expose wrongdoing. I urge everyone to leave her alone and focus on protecting her family. It’s astonishing how interconnected certain organizations and individuals are, particularly regarding Battelle and Oak Ridge National Laboratory. The recent appointments and their timing raise questions about potential agendas, especially in light of recent events. Thanks to those who contributed insights on this matter.

@DecentBackup - BackupDecentFiJC

Oh ya? I think being an honest, caring and decent person is more important than just making shit up about someone you’re desperately trying to “discredit” at all costs. Especially someone you’ve been emotionally and psychologically abusing for as long as I can remember — simply because she’s a relentless, brilliant researcher, she’s been through some absolutely heinous shit in her life and she’s one of the few people on earth who’s capable of parsing and exposing all your vile misdeeds. And also because she refused to join “the payroll” and actively work against America’s best interests, unlike the rest of the Con Inc midwits. But I digress. Or maybe we should ask THESE people for their opinions on the matter. Whaddya think?

@jessy_laine83 - Jessy

@s1ngular1ty1337 @DecentBackup @okahomadude @merissahansen17 Who cares. Protecting her small children is more important than providing receipts to internet strangers.

@DecentBackup - BackupDecentFiJC

PS: If it feels like I’m talking to all of you, that’s because I am. Leave her the fuck alone. You’re fucking warned.🫡

@DecentBackup - BackupDecentFiJC

Lol, Mark Halperin.🤣 His bro (David) is CEO of Israel Policy Forum (10/7). His dad (Morton) was Director of ACLU, served in the LBJ, Nixon, Clinton and Obama, administrations and was super tight with Henry Kissinger and was a Senior Associate at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. (Your textbook set of DC Jew traitors.)

@DecentBackup - BackupDecentFiJC

Welp, isn’t this just an un-fucking-believable Cohencidence™️. There’s Oak Ridge National Laboratory, which is run by BATTELLE, again. Who could’ve POSSIBLY predicted this? Perhaps we should speak to Kathryn Moler, Stanford’s Vice Provost, Dean of Research and (as of September 2024) VP for SLAC. Or better yet, we’ll get in touch with Stephen Streiffer, the recently-appointed DIRECTOR of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (July 2023), whom Kathryn Moler just replaced as Stanford’s VP for SLAC.

@DecentBackup - BackupDecentFiJC

BATTELLE: Awww, yeah… there’s my bitch. ✅WAYNE A.I. FREDERICK *TEMPUS AI *SAVE THE CHILDREN *BOSTON CONSULTING GROUP *BLACKSTONE *FEDERAL RESERVE BOARD OF FIFTH DISTRICT RICHMOND *POTOMAC QUANTUM INNOVATION STEERING CENTER *GREATER WASHINGTON PARTNERSHIP *NATIONAL ACADEMY OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION annnnnd… *AGOSTINI LTD *FORMA THERAPEUTICS *INSULET *HUMANA *MUTUAL OF AMERICA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY *Thanks for the heads up, @andrewmitch84. This is another classic “Intel spooks”/DoE DEW/Green Energy Terrorism/money laundering/kid trafficking rackets that CIA, Booz Allen Hamilton, U.S. Navy and Raytheon/Lockheed/Boeing know and love so well.

@DecentBackup - BackupDecentFiJC

💥MASSIVE PROPS go out to @NoogaJack and @kaitlynspup on the Battelle and Oak Ridge National Laboratory deets. And to @DataRepublican on the Battelle assist! Thanks, team!🇺🇸🫡 https://t.co/MdenmunjSb

@DecentBackup - BackupDecentFiJC

It’s interesting that you mentioned Battelle does contract work for the DoE at Oak Ridge National Laboratory in Oak Ridge, TN, @kaitlynspup. Because HARRIET KUNG, the Acting Director of @doescience, had some very high praise for Kathryn Moler, right after Moler was appointed to replace Stephen K. Streiffer as the new VP of SLAC in September 2024. Stephen Streiffer resigned from SLAC and became the new Director of Oak Ridge National Laboratory on October 16, 2023. Interesting timing too, that appointment date. Just 9 days after the grotesque 10/7 attacks that Israel Policy Forum and its CEO, David Halperin (Mark Halperin’s brother), helped plan and execute. I’m sure that’ll never be relevant again either.🫡

Saved - January 24, 2025 at 2:26 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Calley and Casey Means are highlighted as influential figures in the MAHA movement, which is criticized for diverting attention from the harms of COVID vaccines. Retired pharma executive Sasha Latypova describes this movement as a psyop, promoting an "Anything But Vaccines" strategy that shifts blame for chronic illnesses away from vaccines. Latypova warns that the MAHA agenda may lead to food shortages under the guise of improving food quality, suggesting a plan to control the food supply and eliminate small farms, as past pandemic strategies have lost credibility.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

"Calley and Casey Means come from a family [that's as] Deep State as Deep State gets...their father is a Knight of Malta..." "We call the [MAHA] strategy ABV—Anything But Vaccines." Retired pharma R&D executive Sasha Latypova (@sasha_latypova) describes for Victor-Hugo Vaca II the myriad ways the MAHA movement is, in effect, a huge psyop being orchestrated to draw people's attention away from the enormous harms of the COVID injections and other "vaccines." In this clip, Latypova highlights the usurpation of the health freedom movement into MAHA, led by Calley and Casey Means, who "come from a family [that's as] Deep State as Deep State gets." The retired pharma R&D executive notes that the goal of this psyop movement is to blame the chronic illness epidemic in America on "anything but vaccines." This "ABV" strategy, she notes, has led to a focus on bogus progress, such as banning Red Dye 3, which, according to a crowdsourced research effort conducted by some of her SubStack readers, is not linked to cancer in anyway whatsoever. Furthermore, Latypova notes that the MAHA movement will ultimately be used as a way to create food shortages and famine under the guise of attempting to improve food quality. "They're going to engineer famine next time because pandemics don't work so much for them anymore. Too many people called BS. Too many people woke up from this," Latypova says. "They're going to go after the food supply, and, again, eliminate small businesses, put everything into industrial agriculture that they can easily control, and that's their next step plans." --------------Partial transcription of clip-------------- "It's all distraction into oh, we need to clean up the food. We live in toxic food. We live in toxic sludge. Everything is toxic around us. We just need to focus on everything else. So we call the strategy ABV, anything but vaccines. So they will tell you anything causes cancer. They will put proposition 65 notices on just about anything including Starbucks cups and say it's known to cause cancer. They already banned smoking, so they can't pin it on smoking anymore. So they go after food. "And so this whole MAHA policy was we need clean food, we need new nutritional guidelines, we need to ban all kinds of toxic things in agriculture, meaning pesticides, meaning you're gonna reduce yields, meaning you're gonna increase food prices, and a bunch of people are gonna starve. And we also need to, very recently, they finally banned the Red 3, which turns out actually, I did a crowdsourced, I I wrote an article and I asked my contributors, a lot of them are scientists also, to look up the food toxicology papers. There's no proof it causes cancer. None. If maybe if you eat 400 pounds of it, maybe. But it does not cause cancer. There's no proof of it. It's all political BS, and it's not even used anymore. That's why FDA was so happy to ban it. "So all of this is BS and distraction into toxic everything, all Wi-Fi and 5G and nanobots and chemtrails, and let's, you know, ban everything in agriculture so we can't grow anything anymore. But nothing about  vaccines in that MAHA policy at all. And turns out who came up with that policy? Oh, well, Calley Means— a new arrival in the health freedom movement are these Means twins. Have you seen them on Tucker Carlson show everywhere? "And so, right, so this is another surprise after this MAHA policy was like, who are these people? We have them in Senator Johnson's hearings with brother and sister Calley and Casey Means. And we see both of them talking in Senator Johnson's hearings. We see that they immediately go on Tucker Carlson show, Casey Means, and they talk for two hours about nonsense like, oh, we need to eat healthy. We've discovered the metabolic condition that can be, you know, cured by healthy eating and exercise. Oh my God. This is just, like, earth shattering news. Right? We've never we never knew about such stuff. Like right? "And Tucker Carlson is all like, oh, you were such a wonderful you know, you're a doctor from Stanford, like, 10 years of training in Stanford. Oh, but you quit in your 30th birthday. Turns out all of it is a lie. So my friend, Debbie Lerman, actually a journalist, did an actual journalism, digging deep into their backgrounds, and she found that these two clowns, Calley and Casey Means, first of all, she's not a doctor from Stanford. She quit some surgical residency in Oregon State, but somehow, Tucker Carlson repeats numerous times that she's a doctor from Stanford. "And she's so amazing. RFK Jr., somehow, in his acceptance speech in Arizona rally when he went to join Trump's campaign, promotes Calley Means as if he's such a, and everybody's like, who? You know? But he says, oh, he's been working for me. He's such a expert in soil regeneration. No. Nobody know. Like, it's these two, Calley and Casey Means, come from a family of Deep State as Deep State gets, including their father is a Knight of Malta, a thousand year old organization. They're plants from the Deep State, immediately parachuted. They also connected to pharma lobbying, Mercury LLC. You know, they've been lobbying for pharma for their professional lives. They've been parachuted immediately into Trump's campaign. "Also, Calley Means claimed that he as the one who convinced RFK Jr. to join Trump's campaign, and they are managing this campaign such that RFK Jr. cannot say a peep about vaccines or pharma. And all of it is going to be we're going to overly regulate the food supply, and we're gonna make huge changes there so that small farms can survive, so that everything has to be shut down, that they will we will be able to announce pandemics of new viruses and chicken farms and kill all the chickens so that, again, we don't have eggs in the stores, prices go up. "And, yes, they're going to engineer famine next time because pandemics don't work so much for them anymore. Too many people called BS. Too many people woke up from this. Now they're gonna be doing this. They're going to go after food supply, and, again, eliminate small businesses, put everything into industrial agriculture that they can easily control, and that's their next step plans."

Saved - January 29, 2025 at 4:15 AM

@DecentBackup - BackupDecentFiJC

Bari Weiss isn’t a neocon. She’s fucking Mossad.

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Listen to Tucker describe perfectly how Jewish Neocons like Bari Weiss, have switched from liberal to conservative to push the war with Iran and subvert the right wing…. https://t.co/lqkwHOyTWv

Video Transcript AI Summary
The discussion highlights the strategic deception in media, particularly with figures like Barry Weiss, who shifts from leftist to conservative stances to promote a pro-war agenda, specifically against Iran. The speaker expresses confusion over this shift, noting that moderate views are often labeled as anti-American. There's a concern that aligning with certain political factions increases the likelihood of conflict, particularly with Iran or Russia. The speaker emphasizes a desire for peace and questions the motivations of those advocating for war, suggesting that the media landscape is being manipulated to suppress dissent against military action.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Ever Yes. Is absolutely essential towards any road to war. And and I have to say the amount of calculated deception on the right. So all of a sudden, Barry Weiss, who's a leftist, becomes a conservative because she's against trannyism or something. Would you know, every normal person is against that. Yeah. But it you'd it's pretty obvious that the whole purpose of her organization, the free press, in her career in journalism, is to kind of soften up the right for war with Iran and and to attack anybody. And she gets whole constellation of people, you know, Neil Ferguson and all these kind of people who add weight to the project, but who really are all kind of paid to flack for war with Iran and attack anyone who's not with the program. I felt the sting of this, so I I didn't really understand how this worked. But then, you know, someone with, like, thoroughly moderate foreign policy views, I don't really want war with anybody. I'm not against anybody. And all of a sudden, you're like, wow. You know, people are calling you anti American. Well, there's precedent for this. So what you're just I don't know I don't know any of the people you described personally. What I'm just saying, like, there there was you said the problem with voting Republican is you're more likely to wind up with a war with Iran, and I agree with you. I'd much rather be with Iran than a war with Russia, but kinda don't want either one. And it's just interesting how the the groundwork I just know because I've been in conservative media my whole life. Also, all these new people and you're like, oh, Barry Weiss, are you really conservative? Well, not at all. Then what are you doing here? Oh, you're trying to convince me that I'm not allowed to oppose a war with Iran.
Saved - January 31, 2025 at 11:16 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I can't believe a few negative comments about my sweater have turned into such a big deal. The mean girl energy is off the charts, especially since no one even asked for feedback. At 23, I've already broken more stories than many mainstream reporters, all while graduating from UChicago in just three years. The War Room audience is incredibly powerful, as shown by the election results. Your attempts to smear me as misinformation have clearly failed, and now you're trying to paint me as a dumb bimbo. Good luck with that.

@nataliegwinters - Natalie Winters

Excuse me? A few deranged haters comment that they didn’t like my *sweater* and this becomes a story? This mean girl energy is unreal, and you didn’t even ask for comment. Last time I checked, at 23 I’ve broken more stories than most mainstream reporters (that you all tried to censor and actively suppress by smearing as misinformation.) All while graduating from UChicago in three years. The War Room audience is the most powerful in media history - just look at the election results. Or ask Kevin McCarthy. Or Peter Daszak. Or (preemptively pardoned) Anthony Fauci. Sorry your viewership is sinking and your audience has no power. It’s very clear that your misinformation attacks FAILED so now you’re pivoting by trying to depict me as some dumb, vapid bimbo. Good luck with that. I know the left loves transgenderism, obesity, and ugly people, but you should pick someone else to attack.

@MailOnline - Daily Mail Online

Controversial White House Correspondent slammed over 'inappropriate' outfits https://trib.al/RvpOGEX

SocialFlow trib.al
Saved - February 28, 2025 at 8:32 PM

@MyLordBebo - Lord Bebo

He said bitch, like JD Vance is a bitch because he brings up bad topics. https://t.co/sWbqA687GX

Saved - March 18, 2025 at 2:47 AM

@GoyWonderTM - Juan Decentbaum

Your saltiness and hatred of truth and Whites isn’t our problem. It’s yours. It’s why The Daily Wire is being seen for what it is (Israeli intelligence) and is dying as a result.

@JeremyDBoreing - Jeremy Boreing

I predicted in January of 2024 that Tucker would conclude America was the bad guy in WWII. I’m not a prophet. It’s just been clear for a long time where this was going.

@AFpost - AF Post

Tucker Carlson begins to question whether it was preferable that the Allies won WW2 after seeing the effects of mass migration. Follow: @AFpost https://t.co/apj7lP0xbE

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker expresses concern about the state of Europe, despite their affection for the continent and family ties there. They believe Europe is currently "so degraded" but refrain from elaborating further or speculating on whether the situation could worsen.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It is I don't wanna be dark. I know this is gonna be clipped, but, like, at this point, Europe is so and I love Europe, and I'm there constantly, and my family there. I mean, I I really love Europe truly as an American. Yeah. But, like, it's so degraded. You know. I don't even wanna say it. I'm not even gonna say would it actually be worse or not. I just but it's pretty bad right now.
Saved - May 7, 2025 at 5:02 AM

@WhitlockJason - Jason Whitlock

.@TuckerCarlson ripped Bill Maher: “He’s one of the most unwise people in the media… I feel sorry for him. He’s almost 70 years old and has accrued no wisdom in his life” https://t.co/kDVCbObYKc

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers discuss Bill Maher, questioning his motives and perceived lack of wisdom. One speaker says Maher is unwise, lacking a deep understanding of people and the world, and that they don't listen to him. The other speaker agrees, adding that the Bible is the source of all wisdom and that Maher enjoys the benefits of America's Christian founding while mocking Christianity. They contrast this with Adam Carolla, who, despite being agnostic, prefers living next to Christians. The first speaker says there is no free speech without Christianity and that the tolerant and forgiving nature of Christians allows them to laugh at themselves, unlike "godless leftists" who take themselves too seriously. The second speaker expresses pity for people like Maher who may face a lonely and terrifying end without belief or companionship, especially as they age and confront death.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm I'm looking at people like Bill Maher who is positioning himself as an honest broker and someone that can see both sides. Should I buy it or is this just a business? Bill Maher? I don't buy it but I'm just asking you. It seems like it's a gimmick. He went to the White House with Kid Rock and they had dinner and he talked about it and he said something halfway positive about Trump. Is this just a business decision or Speaker 1: He's one of the most unwise people I've ever met. And I don't mean that as an I mean, I feel sorry for him. He's almost 70 years old and has accrued no wisdom in his life. And that's what I respect in people, particularly men, women too. I respect wisdom. Not knowledge, not glibness, a deep understanding of the way people are and the way the world works. That's what I really, really care about. You've got priorities that are real, that are enduring because our lives are not enduring. Our lives will be forgotten. Our graves will be unvisited, actually, over time. We will not count in history. But understanding that, understanding just how little power you have, understanding that what really matters is what comes after this, like, those are the roots of wisdom. And I I feel like he has none of that at all. So I don't listen to a single word he says ever. Speaker 0: It's not not to beat up on Mar, but I will take a couple shots here. You know, the bible is the source of all wisdom and and you can be really smart without the bible but you cannot be wise and so when I see someone like Mar who loves to mock Christianity but loves all the benefits of America's Christian founding. And these guys, this is where I give Adam Carolla credit, he's agnostic I believe but he's willing to say, I'd rather live next door to a Christian person than virtually anybody else. And Mar is starting to figure out like there is no free speech without Christianity. Speaker 1: That's for sure. Speaker 0: We are so tolerant and forgiving and we can laugh at ourselves because we accept how effed up we are and the godless leftists take themselves so seriously, they think they're God and that's why they get offended if they get criticized or mocked or made jokes about. But, yeah, so I I'm not I I totally agree with you about Bill Maher and I've occasionally enjoyed his program. Speaker 1: You gotta feel sorry for people like that though. Like, in the end, it's all fun, you're rich, tons of hot, you know, 22 year old girlfriends and everything. So fun. And then you get, like, Parkinson's or you get old. You know what I mean? And there's nobody there and, like, you don't believe anything and there's just, like, just a blankness ahead of you and, like, you're terrified. You're terrified. Imagine being an atheist on your deathbed having just, you know, seen people die in the last couple of years, and we all have seen people die. Like, you don't wanna be that person, and we should feel compassion. I mean it too. I'm not being patronizing. I'm being sincere.
Saved - June 4, 2025 at 9:11 PM

@LauraLoomer - Laura Loomer

Unbelievable! Just walked into my deposition. Unreal. Davis Wright Tremaine @DWTLaw, the law firm @billmaher and @HBO hired to defend themselves against my defamation lawsuit shares an office building with The Washington Post. Liberal cesspool. Birds of a feather!

@LauraLoomer - Laura Loomer

I am about to walk into my deposition for my DEFAMATION lawsuit against @billmaher and @HBO. I will be offline till my deposition is over. It’s absolutely OUTRAGEOUS that I have to use my very valuable time and resources to defend myself from sexist, misogynist and anti-Trump slurs made against me by one of the Left’s biggest Trump haters: Bill Maher. Everyone can see Maher’s long history and record of anti-Trump and low class tweets attacking @potus, his wife @MELANIATRUMP and his family. Bill Maher has in effect sexually harassed me in a vile, and very public manner which has severely harmed and damaged me and my reputation. He accused me of adultery and used me as a vehicle to attack President Trump during the 2024 Presidential election. Everybody knows I should be working in the White House, but Maher tried to Monica Lewinsky me and make me radioactive as I was traveling with President Trump and his campaign team simply because I am an effective investigative journalist, and a Jewish woman. Everyone knows Maher is an ATHEIST who hates women. He especially hates women who support and like President Trump. Who is representing Maher and @HBO in this legal matter? An anti-Trump law firm named Davis Wright Tremaine. @DWTLaw The law firm Davis Wright Tremaine has been hard at work "defending" those who have tried to destroy President Trump @realDonaldTrump, his family, me and anyone who stands up to the left and their vile, fake news propaganda. The firm advertises, as you can see in this article, that it is anti-Trump and anti-conservative. They proudly promoted on their website that they are “Trump’s Least Favorite Firm” in a @THR Hollywood Reporter spread in 2019, which they have since deleted from their website after I exposed this. My lawyer @LarryEKlayman has opposed DWT many times. Among the many Leftists and Trump haters DWT has represented is George Stephanopulos and ABC @ABC @ThisWeekABC in a defamation case filed by President Trump over a false accusation of RAPE. Ultimately, they settled with President Trump for $15 MILLION in December 2024. This further demonstrates how depraved Davis Wright Tremaine is as a firm. They defend people who make defamatory remarks for the sake of destroying our country and emboldening communists in the media. They tried to destroy President Trump’s reputation and his marriage by defending a Fake News puppet who accused Trump of being a RAPIST. Now, Davis Wright Tremaine is up against me and my lawyer Larry Klayman @LarryEKlayman in a defamation case I filed against Bill Maher and HBO. They want to defend Maher from facing consequences for falsely accusing me of having sex with Donald Trump, which was an attempt to destroy my reputation, as well as President Trump’s marriage with @MELANIATRUMP In April, DWT signed a brief DENOUNCING President Trump and his efforts to crack down on radical Left law firms that participate in the Weaponization of Government. They went out of their way to defend the anti-Trump, radical Leftist firm PERKINS COIE. You can support my legal fund to pay for the costs of this litigation to hold Bill Maher and his enabler HBO legally accountable here. Thank you. 🙏 👇🏻 https://www.givesendgo.com/LoomerLawfare 👇🏻

Laura Loomer Lawfare Fund Stand with Laura Loomer: Fund the Fight Against Lawfare and Expose the TruthPatriots, truth-seekers, and freedom lovers—Laura Loomer needs your help now more... givesendgo.com

@LauraLoomer - Laura Loomer

🚨 LAURA LOOMER VS BILL MAHER LAWSUIT UPDATE 🚨 I have arrived in DC for my deposition. Tomorrow, June 4, 2025, I am being deposed in DC by @billmaher and @HBO at the law offices of Davis Wright Tremaine @DWTLaw. This is an anti-Trump law firm, and they openly advertise

Saved - June 19, 2025 at 1:58 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared a screenshot of FARA documents showing Qatar paid over $200,000 for an interview between Tucker Carlson and the Qatari Prime Minister, despite Qatar's funding of Hamas. This interview appears to be a propaganda piece, as Qatar is known for financing Islamic terrorism globally. I believe Tucker's views on Iran are compromised by this financial relationship, and his media company has ties to a Muslim investor connected to Qatar. It's concerning that conservative voices may be influenced by these interests, undermining pro-American and pro-Israel perspectives.

@LauraLoomer - Laura Loomer

Here’s the screenshot from the FARA documents filled out this year that prove Qatar paid hundreds of thousands of dollars for an interview between @TuckerCarlson and the Prime Minister of Qatar (the same Qatar which funds HAMAS) regarding the “war with Iran”. This was a paid propaganda piece in which over $200,000 was paid by the Embassy of the State of Qatar for Tucker to interview a Qatari official all while knowing HAMAS is an Iranian proxy and funded by Qatar. Qatar funds Islamic terror all around the world and they think they can just pay everyone off to make them turn a blind eye. The Qataris are global funders of Islamic terrorism and their money has been used to murder American citizens. These are not good people. Tucker Carlson wants you to think his thoughts on Iran are based and original, but he’s literally participating in paid for interviews by the Qataris, who are funding and providing pent houses and luxury lifestyles to the leaders of HAMAS in DOHA. Tucker should just be honest that he’s a mouthpiece for genocidal Muslims. His media company was literally funded by a MUSLIM investor who is half Pakistani and half Iranian and who spends a lot of time in Qatar. And trust me when I say a lot of people in pro-Trump circles are very uncomfortable with this. Tucker is controlled by Muslims. People need to wake up and stop pretending like this is a conspiracy theory. Qatar and Iran are buying off conservative podcasters to push pro-Islamist, anti-American and anti-Israel talking points to undermine President Trump.

Saved - June 19, 2025 at 7:22 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
This is a false accusation. The contract and filing mentioned have nothing to do with us, and neither Tucker nor TCN has accepted any foreign money, including from Qatar. The real issue seems to be a disagreement with Tucker's views on a war you support. It would be more straightforward to address him directly about that. Your attacks are not new; they echo the tactics used against President Trump for stepping outside the pro-war narrative. The FARA report you referenced pertains to Lumen8Advisors, which clarified that they were paid for preparing the Qatari Prime Minister, not for Tucker's interview.

@NeilPatelTDC - Neil Patel

This is a lie. This contract and filing has nothing to do with us. Tucker and TCN have never accepted any foreign money, Qatari or otherwise. None of this is even about the interview anyway, of course. It's about you not liking Tucker's views on a war that you want. That's your right, but it would be more honest if you addressed Tucker directly on the real topic. There's nothing new to your attack — if there’s one thing President Trump has made clear, it's that stepping out of line with the pro-war monolith is dangerous. That’s why they’ve spent the last 10 years trying to destroy him with lies and violence. You're now trying to run that type of playbook against Tucker and it's not going to work any better. The FARA report you posted was for payments to a group called Lumen8Advisors that is registered to work for Qatar. Lumen8 has now made clear in the statement below that neither they nor the Qatari government paid Tucker to do this interview as you wrongly alleged. Lumen8 also makes clear in the statement that it was they who were paid for their work prepping the Qatari Prime Minister for the interview. You already knew all that of course, but for other people who care about the truth, Lumen8's entire statement is pasted below.

@LauraLoomer - Laura Loomer

Here’s the screenshot from the FARA documents filled out this year that prove Qatar paid hundreds of thousands of dollars for an interview between @TuckerCarlson and the Prime Minister of Qatar (the same Qatar which funds HAMAS) regarding the “war with Iran”. This was a paid propaganda piece in which over $200,000 was paid by the Embassy of the State of Qatar for Tucker to interview a Qatari official all while knowing HAMAS is an Iranian proxy and funded by Qatar. Qatar funds Islamic terror all around the world and they think they can just pay everyone off to make them turn a blind eye. The Qataris are global funders of Islamic terrorism and their money has been used to murder American citizens. These are not good people. Tucker Carlson wants you to think his thoughts on Iran are based and original, but he’s literally participating in paid for interviews by the Qataris, who are funding and providing pent houses and luxury lifestyles to the leaders of HAMAS in DOHA. Tucker should just be honest that he’s a mouthpiece for genocidal Muslims. His media company was literally funded by a MUSLIM investor who is half Pakistani and half Iranian and who spends a lot of time in Qatar. And trust me when I say a lot of people in pro-Trump circles are very uncomfortable with this. Tucker is controlled by Muslims. People need to wake up and stop pretending like this is a conspiracy theory. Qatar and Iran are buying off conservative podcasters to push pro-Islamist, anti-American and anti-Israel talking points to undermine President Trump.

Saved - June 24, 2025 at 5:47 PM

@LauraLoomer - Laura Loomer

.@TuckerCarlson lied and said he doesn’t know who I am. His cell is in my phone. 🤣🤣🤣 He also said I’m the “world’s creepiest human.” This coming from a grown man who claims he was attacked in his bed by a demon @ left with bloody claw scars. We have never seen the “scars”.

@TheChiefNerd - Chief Nerd

TUCKER: “Laura Loomer, the world's creepiest human, I don't even know where she came from or who she is exactly but she's running around saying, ‘I'm Donald Trump's defender.’ It's bizarre.” https://t.co/OwJKrIP5y1

Video Transcript AI Summary
Mark Levin and others are using a "Trump skin suit" despite previously hating him and his agenda, including his foreign policy views, which they privately call "insane and isolationist." These individuals, including some at Fox News, harbor contempt for Trump. The speaker expresses frustration at seeing figures like Levin and Laura Loomer, whom they describe as the "world's creepiest human," championing Trump. The speaker believes it's dangerous for the country if people with a track record of failure and ideas that have demonstrably harmed the United States take control of the "America First" political movement. The speaker does not want to relive past mistakes and accuses Levin, Loomer, and others of being ignorant and irresponsible in their demands for military action, as they don't understand the potential consequences.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But Levin, again, doesn't care about The United States, and they're all wearing the Trump skin suit right now because they think it suits their purposes. These are people who hated Trump. They're anti Trump. They're never Trump, and that would include a lot of people on Fox News who I worked with for fifteen years. I know what their political views are. I they're my colleagues. They hate Trump. They hate him personally. They hate his agenda. They hate his economic views, and they really hate his foreign policy views, which in private they describe as insane and isolationist. He's a Nazi and all this stuff. I mean, they really have contempt for him. They kept him off the air at Fox News while I was there against my protests. So so that's just that's all true, and it's very frustrating as a literal person who cares about what's true to see people jumping up Mark Levin or Laura Loomer, that's world's creepiest human. I don't even know where she came from or who she is exactly, but she's running around. I'm I'm Donald Trump's, you know, defenders. It's bizarre. Champion. Champion. And and I'm and I'm the arbiter of what it means to be for America, someone who, again, has no interest in The United States. Demont demonstrated no interest. So I think it's just important. It's not a matter of score settling, and I don't I don't care what Mark Levin does in his private life. I don't care what his opinions are. Laura Loomer, I'm not even really sure who she is. However, if people like that are able to take over a political movement whose stated goal is to serve The United States, first and foremost, America first, make America great again. If those people can take control of that political movement, first of all, it's an offense against reality and truth, but second, it's really dangerous for the country. When they washed out of the Democratic party, this this the same people, and now they're trying to take over the Republican party. You know, how about no? Unbroken track record of failure, unbroken track record of ideas that hurt The United States in measurable ways, impoverished The United States, put us in unpayable debt, killed a ton of people, destabilized the world, caused a refugee crisis in Europe, destroyed Europe. You know, that's a lot of destruction for for one group of of people and one set of really bad ideas, the John Boltons, the Bill Crystals. Can they be allowed to take over the Trump White House? No. How about no? Just as an American. I mean, I don't and I don't really care what people think of me at this point. I'm 56. You were wrong. Well, I yeah. I've been wrong many many times. I'll be wrong many many more times. But the one thing I am is sincere. I really mean it. I don't care about the effect on me. I just I don't wanna relive Iraq. And I know the people who did it. I've lived among them. I defended it. I repeated their talking points. Not doing that again. And we came really close to doing that again because of Mark Levin and Laura Loomer and the rest of these morons who've never even left New Jersey. Like, they don't know anything about the world. That's the other thing. They're dumb. They don't know they don't not only they don't know the population of Iran, they don't know anything. They don't know the nations that border it. They just they just don't know anything. And I'm not making an argument for expertise or having been there, but I am making an ex an argument for being responsible when you demand that the US military do certain things. Okay. Then tell me what happens next. They can't. Because, again, they don't care.
Saved - July 15, 2025 at 5:11 PM

@DickAlupinya247 - Richard Allupinya

You’re an Israeli spy and nobody gives one single fuck about what you have to say.🖕

@ArynneWexler - Arynne Wexler

Tucker lost me in February 2024 with his Russian supermarket stunt “Look at my grocery cart” as if even the average person in America doesn’t intuitively understand the concept of per capita GDP You could do the same thing in Guatemala and everyone would roll their eyes Even worse, the slop meme accounts propagated the video and all that did was make the right look economically illiterate They’re not actually this stupid (though some are) They just believe you are Stop consuming the slop

Saved - August 6, 2025 at 9:42 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Tucker Carlson suggested that Nick Fuentes must be a government informant for knowing about his father's CIA background, which I found surprising since this information has been publicly available for years. I pointed out that many online users, including myself, had shared this info long before Tucker claimed to have discovered it. His recent admission about learning this from a Fuentes video, despite his father's lifetime knowledge, seems implausible. I also noticed Tucker's similarities to Ben Shapiro's past criticisms of Fuentes.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

1/ Tucker Carlson tells Candace Owens that Nick Fuentes must be a Fed, because how else could Nick know Tucker's dad was CIA when Tucker just found out this year? "How the hell would this child from Chicago know this?" But it's been publicly available info for years on the internet. Originally posted to bitchute 4 years ago (where it has 100k views), I even posted it to Gab over 2 years ago. Am I a Fed, too, Tucker? What does it say about Tucker's credibility that hundreds of thousands of internet anons figured out that his dad worked for the CIA before Tucker did? And why would Tucker be mad at people for their sleuthing of publicly available internet info?

Video Transcript AI Summary
Someone sent the speaker a video of a young, talented person from Chicago attacking him, claiming his father was in the CIA. The speaker initially dismissed this as untrue. However, after his father's death in March, he learned his father was indeed involved in that world, which shocked him. The speaker questions how this person knew about his father's involvement in intelligence, given his father's age. The person in the video claimed the speaker was a CIA operative. The speaker vehemently denies this, expressing strong animosity towards the CIA. He also says the person has since claimed he is funded by Russia. The speaker finds the CIA accusation personally offensive.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But I had the only reason I know who he is is because someone sent me a video a few years ago of him attacking me, I was like, so I'm looking at this. And I'm like, well, first of this kid's really talented, like legit. And I can assess that just having done the job for so long. So I was like, wow. Lots of talent. Native talent. And he's attacking my dad as a CIA. His dad's in the CIA or whatever. And I'm like, Well, that's no. Untrue. Then my father dies, and I learn, actually, yeah, was involved in that world. I was completely shocked by it. So, no one has to believe me, but that's just a fact. This was in March. And I'm like, well, why would how the hell would this child from Chicago my dad was 84 when he passed. Like, how who's this guy know my dad is? And, like, he's in an intelligence world. How would he know that? And I didn't Wait. So that was his critique of you because I didn't see it? Yeah. Someone just sent me this video, and it was like, you can't believe anything Carlson says because his father was in the CIA and he's a CIA working on behalf of the CIA. Well, I mean, I think it's pretty obvious and I'm pretty I mean, I actually feel emotional in my anger towards CIA. And I think that that comes out on the air quite regularly. Right. And so the idea that I'm working for the CIA is like deranged. Well, it helps, he said I was I'm funded by Russia now. Since the interview, he then did a thing and said I was funded by Russia. A lot more likely to take Russian money than I would be to work for the CIA because you would never take Russian money and you're not Russian. But but I mean, really hate the CIA. I mean, I would I mean, that's like very offensive to me. So why would you It's like personal for you. Well, little bit. Yeah. And anyway, like, who is this kid exactly? And maybe it's just an accident that the guy goes after exclusively goes after people who are in the same

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

2/ To be clear, the info in the "Tucker Carlson Company Man" video has been publicly known for decades. That video put it all together and made it digestible to the masses. You can find it by following my Gab link: https://gab.com/SamParkerSenate/posts/110347283262710429

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

3/ Or, you can watch it right here, and find out the information that Tucker knew his whole life but is pretending to have just found out this year. Do you find Tucker credible? https://t.co/2hwJ97H7Mr

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker alleges Tucker Carlson is a CIA puppet due to his and his father's connections to various organizations. Carlson's father, Richard, was Director of Voice of America, a propaganda broadcasting division with ties to the CIA, and later U.S. Ambassador to the Seychelles. Tucker supposedly attempted to join the CIA and later worked for publications with ties to individuals and organizations connected to the CIA, including the Heritage Foundation and The Weekly Standard. The speaker highlights connections between individuals associated with Carlson, such as Paul Greenberg, William Kristol, and Rupert Murdoch, to organizations like the Council on Foreign Relations, the Rothschilds, and individuals with alleged CIA ties. The speaker claims Carlson ridicules 9/11 conspiracy theories and avoids discussing the Rothschilds due to his controlled opposition role. The speaker suggests media personalities and outlets are controlled, and encourages viewers to research independently and avoid blindly trusting mainstream media figures.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The owners of this country know the truth. It's called the American dream because you have to be asleep to believe it. Speaker 1: Before I begin my video, I just want to remind you my dating site, clownworlddating.com, is up and running. Sign up is free. If you'd like a premium account, it's $10 a month. You could also donate or share a link if you don't want to sign up. Trying to get the idea off the ground. If you want to meet someone who's not an NPC, give Clown World Dating a try. In this video, I will document the many connections Tucker Carlson has to the CIA and other groups. The reason I'm doing this is because right now, he is leading a major part of America off a cliff with his false conservative platform. He rages about the elite and how America seems to be going down the drain when he himself couldn't be more connected to these same elites helping to do it. He is a total shill, a puppet being used to distribute propaganda. What people need to realize is the left and right paradigm we are given is entirely false. Whether you watch CNN or Fox, you are getting CIA agents highly trained in propaganda, usually coming from wealthy families. Take Anderson Cooper, for example. He admittedly interned at the CIA and was born into the Vanderbilt family. He could be called the face of CNN just as Tucker is the face of Fox. Follow me as I take you through his career and document his highly suspect rise in journalism. Don't forget to take notes and research these things yourself. Tucker Carlson was born on 05/16/1969 in San Francisco, California. When he was six years old, his father Richard divorced his mother Lisa and married Patricia Swanson, one of the heiresses to Swanson Enterprises most notable for their TV dinners. Carlson attended many boarding schools during his youth, including locations in Switzerland and Rhode Island. He graduated from Trinity College in Connecticut in 1991, which is known as one of the Little Ivies, which are a group of private schools which compete with Ivy League schools. Supposedly, Tucker attempted to join the CIA when he graduated, but his application was denied. I can't find an explanation as to why he wanted to be in the CIA or why they rejected him. His father was a very well connected man in the media industry and encouraged him to pursue journalism because, quote, they'll take anybody. His father Richard started his career in journalism at the young age of 22. He had jobs as a copy boy at the Los Angeles Times as well as a reporter for United Press International, which at the time was one of the largest newswire services in the world. He worked for a few TV stations in Los Angeles and San Diego before joining San Diego Federal Savings and Loan in 1977. The bank was headed by Gordon Luce, who was the former public affairs director for Reagan. Richard became vice president of finance within three years, and during this time, the bank had a lot of political controversies due to their connections to current and former members of the Reagan administration. In 1983, he decided to get into politics, and in 1984, ran for mayor of San Diego. He lost to his opponent Roger Hedgecock, who was later forced from office in 1985 after it was revealed he received over $350,000 illegally during his campaign. Coincidentally, he would also go on to become a conservative radio host. In 1986, using his connections to the White House, Reagan personally announced his intention to nominate Richard as associate director of the United States Information Agency. He became Director of Voice of America, which was a propaganda broadcasting division of USIA. He served as their longest running Director. Voice of America started in 1941 when President Roosevelt established the Foreign Broadcast Information Service as a program directed by the Office of Strategic Services, which became the CIA. The intention stated publicly was to communicate America's views abroad, but it was really an outfit to disseminate propaganda. The first few broadcasts for Voice of America were done over British Broadcasting Corporation transmitters but expanded rapidly and fell under control of the Office of War Information in 1942. The Office of War Information was tasked with creating and distributing propaganda domestically and internationally. They did this through various means such as broadcast, newspapers, posters, films, and other media. The agency was terminated by President Truman in 1945, their offices were transferred to the State Department and most of the responsibilities were transferred to the CIA. It should also be noted that a Voice of America relay station in Thailand was used as a CIA black site referred to as Cat's Eye or Detention Site Green. These overlaps and connections between Voice of America and the CIA should not be glossed over. In 1991, Richard Carlson was personally nominated by President George H. W. Bush to be The U. S. Ambassador to The Seychelles, a nation of islands off the Eastern Coast Of Africa. In 1997, he became CEO of King World Public Television, which was later purchased by CBS in 1999 for $2,500,000,000 He became the vice chairman of the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies, which is an organization that is part of the Israel lobby in The United States. It was founded by Clifford May, who was also a member of the Council on Foreign Relations, the project for the new American century, and vice chairman of the Republican Jewish Coalition. Now you're starting to see that it was no mistake Tucker wanted to join the CIA and become a journalist, like father like son. Tucker Carlson got his start in journalism when he was hired as a fact checker for policy review. This was a publication put out by the Heritage Foundation. The Heritage Foundation was founded in 1973 by three men: Paul Wyrick, a political activist and commentator Edwin Feulner, an academic who attended London School of Economics, which is a Rothschild controlled school who was also advisor to different government agencies and domestic policy consultant to Reagan, and last but not least, Joseph Coors of the Coors Brewing family. In 1975, Congress investigated the activities of the Korean Central Intelligence Agency in The US. Mr. Had met with the KCIA station chief, Kim Young Hwan, and in the early nineties, the Heritage Foundation started receiving donations from the KCIA. It should also be noted that in 02/2005, Mr. Fuelner was appointed to a task force on UN reform, which included such people as former CIA Director James Woolsey with the goal of achieving a more effective United Nations. The task force was also supported by the Council on Foreign Relations. In 1977, Paul Wyrick hired a man named Roger Pearson to write for policy review. In 1986, an intelligence agency watchdog publication called the Covert Action Quarterly documented Pearson's connections to James Jesus Engelton, who was the former chief of CIA counterintelligence, as well as Daniel Graham, former director of the Defense Intelligence Agency. The Heritage Foundation was largely funded by Joseph Coors through his family wealth, but it also received funding from Chase Manhattan Bank, Pfizer, Dow Chemical, Sears, General Motors, Amoco, and Mobile. David Rockefeller was CEO and Chairman of Chase Manhattan Bank at the time. It should also be noted that David's grandfather, John D. Rockefeller, who started the Standard Oil Company, had to break it up due to antitrust laws, and Amico, as well as Mobile, were once part of the company. John D. Rockefeller also donated the 16 acres of land upon which the United Nations headquarters sits in New York. In David Rockefeller's O Memoirs, he is quoted as saying, some even believe we, the Rockefeller family, are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of The United States, characterizing my family and me as internationalist and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure, One world, if you will. If that's the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it. He also funded and was chairman of the Council on Foreign Relations. A quick little fun fact. Before the homosexual political commentator David Brock, founder of Media Matters for America, a leftist propaganda outlet which received funding from George Soros and given office space by alleged pedophile and human trafficker John Podesta, he was on the board of the Heritage Foundation. He supported Hillary Clinton for president twice and dated James Alifantis, has been accused of being a pedophile and human trafficker. He is also a friend of Lynn Rothschild. Lynn Rothschild supposedly abhors Trump and fawns over Clinton publicly, yet her and Trump go way back as well. Also, here's a photo of Trump laughing it up with happy Rockefeller, wife of former vice president and New York governor Nelson Rockefeller. It's a great example to show you that these people are all liars and actors. They will fill whatever role they need to fill when they need to fill it. Sometimes that involves swinging to the total opposite side of the false paradigm politically if it's advantageous to the agenda of the elite. Pick your central banking puppet, left or right. It's all controlled, and these people are shameless whores. When Tucker Carlson left his job at policy review, he went to work for the Arkansas Democrat Gazette under the tutelage of editor Paul Greenberg. Mr. Greenberg was very well connected having his pieces published across 1,400 different newspapers within the Tribune Content Agency Syndicate at the time. He also won a Pulitzer Prize in 1969, appeared on major television networks as a political commentator on talk shows such as Charlie Rose. Now I can't actually prove that Mr. Greenberg was CIA, but when I started to look at a few publications he put out, it made me start to wonder. In one article entitled How to Break the CIA, published on jewishworldreview.com 09/02/2009, he defends the CIA from what he believes to be unfair persecution. He defends the torture of possibly innocent people as justified in the, quote, war on terror. When referring to the torture of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, he says, are we supposed to be sorry about that and proceed to punish those who uncovered these plans? On what theory? That no good deed for your country should go unpunished? He also boohoos about the morale of the CIA and how investigations might increase their agents' anxiety. In another article by Mr. Greenberg entitled Hooray for Snooping, published in the Arkansas Democrat Gazette 10/23/2013, he talks about a national conference of editorial writers he attended in Calgary, Alberta in the seventies or eighties. In the article, he says that, quote, that year at Calgary, one solemn resolution proposed that we stop talking to the CIA since a number of journalists abroad had been assassinated on the pretext that we were all CIA agents, capitalist spies, tools of imperialism, and, well, you know the rest. As if the killers were so lacking in imagination, they couldn't come up with some other excuse to do away with us if they hadn't invented this one. So there we were, an all too solemn convention assembled, First Amendment or no, debating whether we should gag ourselves. I dissented, being an American, and unaccustomed to being told whom I could talk to or not talk to. Memory grows furtive, but I believe the resolution was defeated. That it was ever considered was disgraceful enough. It occurs to some of us that if the CIA and FBI and NSA had been allowed to talk even to each other before 09/11/2001, that date might not have become another one that will live in infamy. If only big data could have been mined back then the way it is now, the country might have been a lot safer along with the thousands of innocent victims who found themselves in the Twin Towers that fateful day and others rushing to their rescue as firefighters and cops. And the troops who were stationed at the Pentagon as airliners were turned into flaming engines of destruction, their passengers and crews wiped out, including those who, like the ones aboard Valiant Flight United 93, were the first to mount a counterattack against the terrorists in the still continuing war. It would seem Mr. Greenberg, a very well connected columnist, was very sympathetic to the ambitions of the CIA for seemingly no reason. It should also be noted he was Jewish and a Zionist. When Tucker left the Arkansas Democrat Gazette, he went to work for the Weekly Standard News magazine in 1995. It was founded by William Crystal and Fred Barnes. William Crystal is Jewish and the son of Irving Crystal, who's been described as, quote, the godfather of neoconservatism. Irving Crystal was also a member of the Council on Foreign Relations and worked for the Congress for Cultural Freedom. The Congress for Cultural Freedom was a group started by a Jewish CIA agent named Mikkel Jocelyn in 1950. It distributed anti communist propaganda in 35 countries and published over 20 magazines. In 1966, The New York Times are in a series of articles exposing it as a front for the CIA to transfer money to the State Department and the United States Information Agency, the same agency which broadcasted Voice of America, which Tucker's dad was the director of. In the book, Finks, How the CIA Tricked the World's Best Riders, author Joel Whitney talks about, quote, how the good versus bad CIA is a false divide and that the cultural cold warriors again and again used anticommunism as a lever to spy relentlessly on leftist and indeed writers of all political inclinations, and thereby pushed US democracy a little closer to the Soviet model of the surveillance state. He alleges that Kristol was in fact a CIA employee, The man who referred to Irving as the godfather of neoconservatism was a man named Jonah Greenberg, also Jewish and editor in chief of The National Review, a semimonthly magazine. The magazine was founded by William F. Buckley Jr. And has played a significant role in the development of conservatism in The United States. Like Krystal, Buckley was also outed as a CIA employee in Joel Whitney's book. It should also be noted that Fred Barnes, co founder of The Weekly Standard, currently moderates a show on Voice of America called Issues in the News, again, the same program Tucker's father, Richard, was director of. It would seem William Crystal was also a fan of Paul Greenberg, Tucker's first mentor at the Arkansas Democrat Gazette since he quoted him in an article he published in the Washington Examiner 11/01/2004 entitled the 09/11 connection. In the article, quotes Paul as saying, everything we had thought, assumed, expected in the golden nineties hadn't been so. The surface piece of the nineteen nineties had been bought at a great price. On nine eleven, a failure of American leadership was revealed, a failure to look ahead and act forcefully to forestall threats, to do what Bush has called, quote, the hard work of fighting terror and spreading freedom. William's father Irving, alleged CIA employee, also only had kind words to say about mister Greenberg when he wrote the foreword to his 1991 book, Resonant Lives, 50 Figures of Consequence. He said, and I quote, our intellectual and spiritual elites today are, with some notable exemptions, semi educated at best. This explains why someone like Mr. Greenberg has not received the recognition he deserves. Oh yes, he has won a Pulitzer Prize and other awards, which is nice, but these are tributes to his journalistic talents as a columnist and editorial writer. As a master of the brief moral essay, he has yet to come into his own. These men all seem to connect to one another in some way, and they all seemingly support the, quote, alleged war on terror while increasing the size of the government in the name of preserving freedom. They protect Israel and promote their agenda while scapegoating Muslims for false flag attacks meant to justify giving more power to their think tanks and intelligence agencies, which answer to nobody except the people lining their pockets. After leaving The Weekly Standard, Tucker then went on to write for New York Magazine, Reader's Digest, Slate, Esquire, The New Republic, The New York Times, The Daily Beast, and The Wall Street Journal. He would also go to work on camera for CNN, PBS, and MSNBC before finally settling into his role at Fox News as the poster boy for conservative values. During those years, he also somehow found time to appear on shows like King of Queens, 30 Rock, and Dancing with the Stars. While he is now on Fox News as arguably their most popular personality, this wasn't his first tango with News Corporation, which owns Fox News. News Corporation owned by Rupert Murdoch also owned The Weekly Standard where Tucker worked under Bill Crystal. News Corporation headquarters is located in none other than the Rockefeller Center Complex in New York. Rupert Murdoch is also on the board of Genie Energy, an American energy company located out of New Jersey. Other noteworthy people on the board of Genie Energy include Jacob Rothschild, the head of the Rothschild banking dynasty, and James Woolsey, former director of the CIA, who if you remember earlier, was also on the UN Reform Task Force in 2005 with Heritage Foundation founder Edwin Feulner, whose goal was to create a more effective United Nations, the same United Nations which resides on land donated by John D. Rockefeller. In a 2015 article written by Charlie Rose in Vanity Fair, he details a merger between Jacob Rothschild and David Rockefeller. Rothschild bought 37% of shares in Rockefeller Financial Services through his RIT Capital Partners. This is the same Charlie Rose who would have Arkansas columnist Paul Greenberg on his show to talk politics, and the same Paul Greenberg who was held in such high regard by William Crystal and his father Irving. There are so many overlapping connections that can be made that I probably missed dozens, if not more, during my research into the topic. Given these connections to the CIA, the Rothschilds, the Rockefellers, etcetera, it's no wonder Tucker Carlson ridicules people who believe that 09:11 was an inside job and calls these people parasites. Speaker 0: Now I go back to our intermentors' policies way back in the '16 when we first funded Al Qaeda. Yeah. Back well, not yeah. Back back when they were fighting the Soviets. We we gave them a lot of money. Know, CIA CIA pretty much trained them. I mean I mean, that's that's pretty much enough evidence for me. Speaker 2: Did the government brought down the Twin Towers? Speaker 0: You know The government that the government was involved in bringing them to them because they would not be trained because who because who trained them? The government trained them. The CIA trained them. Special ops trained them. It's Speaker 2: alright. I've I've had this debate so many times. It's not you know, I Speaker 3: don't know. Speaker 2: I just it it seems Speaker 4: to me that it it's kinda beneath sort Speaker 2: of beneath like adult discourse even really, I guess. And it and it definitely discredits otherwise good ideas. I just think that the implications if if the government was involved, the implications are so vast that it should be looked into whether or not it seems ridiculous. Speaker 5: So for family members of the victims that are asking questions and want the evidence that's been withheld by the government released, you would say that they're less than adults somehow for wanting Speaker 2: that I would say that parasites like you make it much worse for them. That's what I would say. Speaker 5: I'm a parasite now? Speaker 2: Yeah. It's it's filthy to say things like that with no evidence, and you have none. Speaker 1: You should say. Speaker 2: That's my Speaker 1: It's also no wonder Tucker Carlson won't seriously address the Rothschilds on his show as his boss probably wouldn't be too happy even though they have so much control and influence. Whenever people bring up legitimate issues, it's his job to mock them so his viewers won't get to the truth of the matter. Speaker 6: Washington DC experienced a mild snowfall last week. Luckily, city councilman Trayon White was on it. He knows why it happened. Watch this. Speaker 7: It just started snowing out of nowhere this morning, man. Y'all better pay attention to this climate control, man. This climate manipulation, and DC keep talking about we're a resilient city, and that's a model based off the Rothschilds controlling the climate to create natural disasters they can pay for to own the cities, man. Be careful. Speaker 6: Yep. The Rothschilds control the climate. The Rothschilds, of course, are a wealthy Jewish banking clan. They're included in a great many conspiracy theories, but those theories rarely give them credit for the weather. That's an ambitious new twist. Mark Stein is an author and columnist and a part time meteorologist, and he joins us tonight. What do you make so this is by the way, I live here, so you can laugh all you want, but that's actually my city councilman speaking there. The Rothschilds control the weather. Did you know that? Speaker 3: Well, I did actually, Tucker. They've, they they bought the weather, from God, back in 1929, when he had a bit of a liquidity problem after the Wall Street crash, and, they keep it in the wine cellars at the Chateau Mouton Rothschild estate in France. And, they're able to micro target the climate. For example, it was light snow in your part of Washington, but I gather in the stairwell of Trayon White's apartment building, he actually had an avalanche just on his floor. That's that's how micro targeted the big Jew weather machine is able to be. And he may and by the way, you may you may think it's a light snowfall, but if you actually examine it, it's actually small pieces of gefilter fish, which is why it doesn't melt. And that's why the Jews control the snowplow business. So they scoop all the Gefilte fish in Washington away, and they use it to make Louis Farrakhan calypso albums, which they put out to discredit, Louis Farrakhan from telling the truth about the synagogue of Satan. It all makes Speaker 6: sense. See, the funny thing is Speaker 2: I mean, I don't Speaker 6: know if it's funny. It's actually so appalling and shocking that it's hard. It's hard. I'm just gonna laugh about it. That was that was you made me feel better about a city out of control. So then I wanna run this by you. May maybe you can make me feel better about this too. There's a new uproar on social media over microaggressions at UC Santa Cruz. The school has assembled a list of microaggressions. Tucker Speaker 1: Carlson seems to be everywhere. He has become the face of the conservative and right wing movement in The United States, surely due to the incredible amount of connections he has to intelligence agencies and the government. This is why the gatekeepers in the media attempt to give him credibility and publish stories like how he's being spied on by the NSA, or how a seemingly random man confronted him in Montana at a fly fishing shop and insulted him trying to start a confrontation, and it turns out that the man was actually an employee of the Asia Foundation, which was created in 1951 by the CIA as a front organization to distribute propaganda. If you had any doubts before watching this that Tucker Carlson was controlled opposition, I hope the research I presented will put that to bed. Mainstream media is all controlled in its one big incestuous pit. Don't worship these people as heroes because they will sell you down the river in a heartbeat. Is Tucker Carlson CIA? Well, you can't prove that directly, but once you pour through all of his connections, you would find it incredibly hard not to believe that is the case. About the only thing we're missing at this point is official government documents detailing as much, which I am sure will come out at some point in the future. The CIA has a very long and documented history of infiltrating and controlling the media. Operation Mockingbird is a great example of that. Tucker Carlson is just one of many examples you could make. Remember to always do your own research and turn off the television.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

4/ Tucker just literally admitted he heard in a Nick Fuentes video from "a few years ago" that his dad was in the CIA--while his dad Dick Carlson was still alive, mind you--yet still claims to have only discovered the truth in March of this year after his father had passed? GTFOH. Laughably unbelievable.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

5/ Did you notice this? https://t.co/7urbo645UI

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

Anyone else notice that Tucker Carlson copied Ben Shapiro's 6-year old smears of @NickJFuentes? Was that organic? https://t.co/kj7D65hugB

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 claims that someone tells edgy jokes about the holocaust and cookies to appear cool. Speaker 0 says that the next step is to declare oneself the true conservative, not a "bunch of masturbating losers who live in your mother's basement." Speaker 1 states that someone was making holocaust jokes. Speaker 1 asks if Nick Fuentes, described as a "weird little gay kid in his basement in Chicago," is participating in a super PAC to bump off Joe Kent.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Then you tell your friends how cool you are, and you tell edgy jokes about the holocaust and cookies because, I mean, what what could be funnier than that, obviously? Speaker 1: And then he gets up there and he's, like, you know, making holocaust jokes. Speaker 0: Step two, then you declare yourself the true conservatives, the true heirs to conservatism. Right? Not a bunch of masturbating losers who live in your mother's basement. No. You're the true heirs of conservatism. Speaker 1: And Nick Fuentes, this child, this weird little gay kid in his basement in Chicago, is participating in a super PAC to bump off Joe Kent?

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@_BarboDoll_ Lamest claim I've heard in a while. Tucker really exposed himself here

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@rheajason99 https://t.co/8U9pm0ca7G

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@Poisonflats I am Spartacus!

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@_hyperborean_ @TuckerCarlson 💯

Saved - August 15, 2025 at 5:45 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Tucker Carlson has a complex relationship with the CIA, having grown up in a world filled with former agents, including his father, Dick Carlson, who held significant positions like Director of Voice of America. Despite admitting in 2024 that his father worked with the CIA, he claimed in 2025 to be shocked by this revelation. I pointed out the inconsistencies in his narrative, noting that he had previously expressed admiration for the CIA and even applied to join. The timeline reveals a pattern of changing stories, suggesting a deeper connection to the agency than he admits.

@indexredtv - Index Red

Tucker Carlson spent decades surrounded by CIA spooks, applied to join them himself, and just claimed he was ‘shocked’ to learn his dad was one. Bro… @TuckerCarlson - you’re a fed. 🧵 Let’s talk about feds, family, and the one lie Tucker didn’t expect you to notice.

@indexredtv - Index Red

Let’s be crystal clear. 🗓️In 2024, Tucker casually admits: “Yeah, obviously my father worked in conjunction with the CIA…” 🗓️ In 2025, he says he was completely shocked to learn that exact same thing. He lied. https://t.co/VHaCelh0Ye

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 recalls applying to CIA and facing criticism, including from Putin, like, oh, you're from a CIA family. Well, yeah, obviously, my father worked in conjunction with CIA. I mean, that's what that is. And I tried to join the CIA, but I'm not being false about it. Native talent. And he's attacking my dad as the CIA is dad to the CIA or whatever. And I'm like, well, that's no. Untrue. Then my father dies, and I learn, actually, yeah, you know, did was involved in that world. I was completely shocked by it. So no one has to believe me, but that's just a fact. Right.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And so when I applied to CIA, and I've taken a lot of crap, including from Putin, like, oh, you're from a CIA family. Well, yeah, obviously, my father worked in conjunction with CIA. I mean, that's what that is. And I tried to join the CIA, but I'm not being false about it. Native talent. And he's attacking my dad as the CIA is dad to the CIA or whatever. And I'm like, well, that's no. Untrue. Then my father dies, and I learn, actually, yeah, you know, did was involved in that world. I was completely shocked by it. So no one has to believe me, but that's just a fact. Right.

@indexredtv - Index Red

Let’s rewind even further. 🗓️ December 2022 - Tulsi Gabbard podcast: “There were a ton of former CIA officers in our neighborhood… my father worked for the government… that’s the world I lived in.” He literally says he applied to join the CIA himself. This world wasn’t new to him. He grew up inside it.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker recalls whether he considered joining the CIA before journalism; "No. Yeah." He notes growing up in Georgetown and says, "And this was obviously, it was ten years before 09/11. It was eleven years, 1990." There were "a ton of former CIA officers in our neighborhood." His father "worked for the government," and CIA officers, from his perspective as a child, were like kind of dashing, physically brave intellectuals, including "some guy who'd studied classics at Yale who wound up in Beirut as station chief." He says he wanted "an interesting life"—"That's the that's the main thing that I wanted out of life." He adds, "I never was interested in money" and, "I had the privilege of not being interested in money because I I didn't grow up in a family where we were worried about money, so I just never really thought about money."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Is it true before you got into journalism, you were thinking about joining the the CIA? Speaker 1: No. Yeah. Speaker 0: Yes. I I actually just I read that somewhere recently. I I didn't I didn't know that. Oh, yeah. What was what was what was your interest? What what drove that? Speaker 1: Well, that's the world that I lived in. I mean, we lived in Georgetown. Mhmm. And this was obviously, it was ten years before 09/11. It was eleven years, 1990. And there were a ton of former CIA officers in our neighborhood. My father worked for the government and, you know, there are a lot of them in that world, and CIA officers, from my perspective as a child, were like kind of dashing, physically brave intellectuals. You know, some guy who'd studied classics at Yale who wound up in Beirut as station chief. You know what I mean? Right. Right. Interesting life. And I wanted an interesting life. That's the that's the main thing that I wanted out of life. I never was interested in money. I had the privilege of not being interested in money because I I didn't grow up in a family where we were worried about money, so I just never really thought about money.

@indexredtv - Index Red

“I was like, oh, CIA. They send you to foreign countries as a case officer and you do vaguely patriotic things, and I was patriotic and I thought that would be great.” Tucker admired the CIA. He applied to join. He knew his neighbors were agents. He wasn’t “shocked” in 2025. He just changed his story.

Video Transcript AI Summary
She explains that she wanted an interesting life, not a boring one, and imagined the CIA would send her abroad as a case officer, doing vaguely patriotic work. She says she was patriotic and believed that would be great. She notes that she did not think the CIA was a sinister force, and it never occurred to her that the CIA might be playing a role in domestic politics. The excerpt ends with an unfinished thought—‘Like, that was ins’—hinting at an evolving reflection on the CIA’s role. This reveals an early perception of espionage as exciting and patriotic, and a lack of awareness of potential domestic political involvement.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But I but I wanted an interesting life. I didn't want a boring life, and so I wanted I was like, oh, CIA. They send you to foreign countries as a case officer, and you do vaguely patriotic things, and I was patriotic, and I thought that would be great. And I didn't I didn't think the CIA was a sinister force. It never occurred to me that the CIA might be playing a role in domestic politics. Like, that was ins

@indexredtv - Index Red

Let’s walk the timeline. 📆 Dec 2022 – Tells Tulsi he grew up around CIA officers, wanted to join. 📆 June 2024 – Admits on camera: “Yeah, my dad worked with the CIA.” 📆 March 2025 – His father dies. 📆 Aug 2025 – Claims he was “completely shocked” to find out.

@indexredtv - Index Red

His father Dick Carlson wasn’t some anonymous bureaucrat. He was: Director of Voice of America (1986–1991) U.S. Ambassador to the Seychelles Long rumored in D.C. to be CIA-connected His obituary called his career “never completely clear” but “undeniably intriguing.” That’s spook speak for: don’t ask.

@indexredtv - Index Red

Tucker was born in it. Tucker was raised by it. Tucker tried to join it. Tucker is a CIA Nepo Baby.

Saved - August 3, 2025 at 11:28 AM

@FuentesUpdates - Fuentes Updates

In 1999, Tucker Carlson claimed Pat Buchanan discredited the discussion about immigration and the Israel lobby. Yesterday, he claimed Nick Fuentes is part of a campaign to discredit "non-crazy, right voices." He's been using the same smear tactics for 25 years. https://t.co/MzyWNTrz2X

Video Transcript AI Summary
One speaker believes people should be allowed to have differing views on immigration and debate the merits of the Israeli lobby's power. However, Pat Buchanan discredits this conversation because he gives the sense that he has another agenda related to personal dislike, conspiracies, and the belief that Jews are a sinister force trying to affect American politics. Another speaker questions if a certain individual exclusively targets people in the same group and makes Holocaust jokes. This speaker suggests this individual is like David Duke, who would endorse their shows. They believe David Duke is part of a campaign to discredit people on the right, and that Nick Fuentes is doing the same. They clarify that this doesn't mean everything he says is false, that he isn't talented, or that he's a bad person, but that he is clearly part of a campaign to discredit non-crazy right voices.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I think that people should be allowed to have differing views on immigration. I think people should be allowed to point out the fact that there is an Israeli lobby, and, yes, it's powerful and debate the merits of that, I I guess. I don't think they're strictly speaking anything wrong with that. But, again, I think Pat Buchanan is part of the reason it's so hard to have that conversation because he discredits it by his by his presence, because he, gives people who watch him carefully the sense that he has another agenda that has to do with personal dislike and that he believes in conspiracies and and that he believes that the Jews are this sinister, secretly organized force, trying to affect American politics. And those aren't discussions I think normal people, sober people should be having because I think they're ludicrous. Speaker 1: Anyway, like, who is this kid exactly? Mhmm. And maybe it's just an accident that the guy goes after exclusively goes after people who are in the same roughly the same. And then he gets up there and he's, like, you know, making holocaust jokes, and it's, like, is it possible that this is like David Duke? David Duke every time I had a new show, David Duke would endorse my show. I don't know Dave who the hell is David Duke? Well, David Duke is obviously part of a campaign to discredit people on the right. Obviously. And I think it's very obvious that Nick Fuentes is exactly the same. Doesn't mean everything he says is false. It's it doesn't mean he's not talented. He's enormously talented. Doesn't mean he's a bad person. I'm not attacking him personally, but he is clearly part of a campaign to discredit non crazy right voices. You know That's obvious to me. I've been around a long time. I know when I see Speaker 0: it.
Saved - August 3, 2025 at 10:34 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
In a 1999 CSPAN call, a caller confronted Tucker Carlson about his association with Bill Kristol, labeling him a neocon and expressing disdain for both. Carlson acknowledged his connection, while the caller emphasized the need for true conservatives like Pat Buchanan, feeling vindicated by the exchange.

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

CSPAN caller 1999- “You (Tucker Carlson) work for Bill Kristol (neocon Jew) don’t you? Tucker Carlson- “I do. Happily.” Caller- “That guy, He’s not a republican, he’s a disgrace. Pat Buchanan just ripped him on a talk show. We don’t need republicans like you or Bill Kristol, we need conservatives like Pat Buchanan.” Caller vindicated.

Video Transcript AI Summary
A caller expresses support for Pat Buchanan and disdain for Bill Kristol, threatening to leave the Republican party if Buchanan goes. The caller admits to not reading Buchanan's book but claims to know its contents through Buchanan's appearances. Kristol's associate notes Buchanan's flirtation with the Reform Party and his meeting with Lenora Fulani, calling it a "bizarre public unraveling." A quote from Buchanan is read, stating women are "physically unequipped to compete in the worlds of athletics and arms." It's noted that Buchanan's long history of public opinions makes him vulnerable to such resurfaced quotes. Another caller expresses disappointment in Carlson and Kristol for attacking Buchanan, clarifying they are not part of the "Buchanan brigade." The caller expresses concern about the Clinton administration giving away U.S. sovereignty, citing the UN's involvement with national parks. Kristol's associate acknowledges the appeal of Buchanan's message regarding authoritarian tendencies in the Clinton administration but questions Buchanan's suitability as a messenger, given his recent actions.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You you work for Bill Crystal. Correct? Speaker 1: I do. Happily. Speaker 0: Yeah. That guy, he's not a republican. He's he's a disgrace. Pat Buchanan just ripped him yesterday on one of the talk shows. And I'm a Pat Buchanan backer, and I think the republican party's gonna rue the day. We don't need republicans like you and Bill Crystal. We need Republicans and conservatives like Pat Buchanan, and I think the Republican is gonna rue the day that you ever mess with Pat because when he goes, I go, and a lot of other people go. Speaker 2: Caller, have you read the book? Speaker 0: No. I have not, but I've listened to Pat over the last week reading the episodes that people are talking about and pretty much know what the book's about because I must have seen them 15 times in all the different shows. And he really tells it like it is. He actually explains more like all these other idiots who just, you know, take it out of context like Bill Crystal doesn't know what the hell he's talking about. Speaker 2: Alright. Thanks. Mister Carlson. Speaker 1: Well, I mean, there are a lot of people who who feel like Pat Buchanan represents something important in the Republican party, and and those are the people who should be on the phone to Pat. Call him at Homan McLean and say, gee, Pat, you know, stay. But it's Buchanan himself, as you know, who began these noises about going to the reform party and and of course went to New York and and had lunch with Lenora Fulani, long time leftist, and in general began this kind of bizarre public unraveling that we've been watching for the past week and a half. It really begins with Pat. Speaker 2: Washington Post pulls out four quotes this morning in their piece that was on the front page. Here's from a 1983 newspaper column, less equipped psychologically to stay the course in the brawling area of business, commerce, industry, and the professions. Women are physic physically unequipped to compete in the worlds of athletics and arms. Speaker 1: It's I mean, this is the problem, this is not unique to Pat, but with running for office when you spend a lifetime putting your opinions out there. You know, obviously, most most candidates for any office spend a lot of time trying to cloak their opinions. Pat has a lot of his out there, so quotes like this always revisit him. Speaker 2: Lin Wood, Washington, you're next. Speaker 3: Hi. I'm a real big fan of Tucker Carlson's and also Pat Buchanan. And Tucker, I think you gotta get outside the beltway, buddy. You know, the American people and I'm a I'm a Reagan Republican. I didn't vote Republican until Ronald Reagan. And I I have to tell you that I'm really disappointed in you and Bill Crystal who I I really do hold in high esteem to attack Pat Buchanan the way he is, and I wasn't I'm certainly not a Buchanan brigade or whatever they call him. Speaker 2: Carla, are you an America firster? Speaker 3: I'm sorry? Speaker 2: Are you an America firster? That's one of the themes of his book. Speaker 3: Well, Tucker brings brings up a good point. America first has the connotations of father what is it? Coughlin? Speaker 2: Coughlin. Speaker 3: Coughlin. Thank you. And and the and the Bundes. But but I'm not in in that regard. But I am am sort of frightened of the way the Clinton administration has given away our sovereignty, just in in incremental pieces. One being the the National Park system and and what has happened with the UN taking over certain of our national parks. Speaker 2: Let's let Tucker Carlson respond, sir. Speaker 1: I think that callers like this are are responding to the good parts of Pat's message. I mean, Buchanan has long pointed out that there are authoritarian tendencies in the Clinton administration. I think that's true by any objective measure. The question is, is Pat Buchanan, you know, the person to carry that message? And I I think more and more just witness the events of the last week. I mean, if if Pat Buchanan is this, you know, pure conservative, then I'm you know, the question is why is he going to the reform party and and making these alliances with discredited figures like Lenora Fulani Speaker 0: and
Saved - August 4, 2025 at 9:58 PM

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Dick Carlson- (Tucker Carlson’s dad) “This is interesting, I’ve never mentioned this because nobody ever asked me, but I was Monica Lewinsky’s book agent.” 🤔 https://t.co/ll7HgZ27Sg

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker is friends with Scooter Libby, whom he considers a person of great integrity. Libby was once his lawyer, through Leonard Garment. The speaker represented Monica Lewinsky in her book deals and sold her book. Scooter Libby drew up the contract for him when he represented Monica, a fact that was kept secret. Monica's mother married Peter Strauss, former director of the Voice of America, after Strauss's wife died. Strauss contacted the speaker to help Monica find legitimate ways to make money to pay her legal fees, as her father was not forthcoming. The speaker spent two weeks with Monica in New York, reviewing hundreds of offers. He then approached a publisher and an author, which led to the book deal.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Woolsey anyway is a friend of Scooters. I've been a friend of Scooters for years. Scooter Libby is a a person in my view of great integrity and and character. He was my lawyer one time before he went into the government. He was he and Leonard Garment were partners in a law firm, Deckard, Price, and Rhodes. Speaker 1: Former counsel to Richard Nixon. Yeah. Leonard Garment. Speaker 0: Yes. Leonard, a great guy in my view and a and a good friend of mine, and that's how I met Scooter through Leonard. Actually, Scooter represented me This is interesting. I've never mentioned this because nobody ever asked me but I represented Monica Lewinsky in her book deals. I was her book agent and I sold the book that my storybook. Anyway, I did And I did a couple of other things for her having to do with representing her, not a press representation. I stayed out of the press, but sort of quasi legal representation. And when I drew up the contract with Monica, it was Scooter Libbey who drew it up for me. So I mean Speaker 1: nothing How she get into that? Speaker 0: Well, Monica's mother married this is we talk about coincidences. Married a fellow who had been Peter Strauss, who had been director of the Voice of America in the Carter administration. Peter Strauss, fine guy, from New York, owned Strauss Communications which had radio stations and newspapers, and, Monica's mother after the scandal broke within about six or seven months that summer. I didn't know Monica's mother and I didn't know Monica, but I knew Peter Strauss. Peter Strauss wife Ellen Salzberger had died two or three years before. Peter's older and Peter married Monica's mother and then Peter called me and said that summer, the summer of the scandal had broken around December as I remember, called me and asked me if I would come to New York and talk to Monica because they were trying to find ways that Monica could legitimately and in a minimal amount of embarrassment make money to help pay for her legal fees and I I could see what the problem was because Peter has children, grown children. Peter was then, sorry, 75 and the fact that she had these enormous fees, hundreds of thousands of dollars, probably was difficult with his family I would imagine. Only guessing at that And her father, who's a physician in Los Angeles, was not forthcoming about paying for the fees. So I went up and I went I spent two weeks with Monica across the hall in the Essex House in a hotel in New York under assumed names and I went through all of her mail and all of the offers and of which they were hundreds and hundreds of offers of different kinds, some ridiculous, some not, in an attempt to find a way to make money so she could pay these legibles and she had just taken on two new attorneys here in Washington actually and Demaras and what's his name? Anyway so I succeeded and I approached a publisher ultimately and an author and anyway, we did the book and and so on. Now why was I telling you all of that? Because Scooter Libbey drew up the contract as with me as her book agent, but though we kept it secret. But Speaker 1: This is a
Saved - August 5, 2025 at 10:22 PM

@NickJFuentes - Nicholas J. Fuentes

Tucker Carlson’s character assassination of Pat Buchanan in 1999 is nearly identical to his attack on me last week. Seriously, what is going on here? This is the definition of controlled opposition. https://t.co/uwvZdlq4P4

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers discuss a controversial figure, possibly Nick Fuentes, noting his talent and articulation while also acknowledging problematic aspects of his views. It's claimed he appeals to young white men who feel economically disenfranchised and unrepresented. One speaker suggests this figure is part of a campaign to discredit legitimate right-wing voices. Concerns are raised about his alleged belief in conspiracies and the idea that Jewish people are a sinister force manipulating American politics. The figure is described as portraying himself as a victim persecuted by a powerful cabal for speaking truth to power, similar to Karen Silkwood. He is accused of making Holocaust jokes and targeting individuals within a specific group. Pat Buchanan's presence is said to discredit certain conversations.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I mean, this is part of the sad thing of happy Canada as far as I'm concerned. Speaker 1: Sad thing is, and I know that no one who watches him will believe me. Speaker 0: That does raise issues that I think are important. Speaker 1: Doesn't mean everything he says is false. It's it doesn't mean he's not talented. He's enormously talented. Doesn't mean he's a bad person. I'm not attacking him personally. Speaker 0: I mean, I think that, you know, the sovereignty of the American military, etcetera. Mean, these are not just crank issues. Speaker 1: It's young white men who've been totally cut out of our economy, attacked mercilessly. I mean, they really are the victims, and they're desperate, and no one speaks for them. So they go to Fuentes because he's, like, incredibly articulate, and they think he's our leader. Speaker 0: But unfortunately, Pat Buchanan raises them in a Speaker 1: way that I think is discredited. But he is clearly part of a campaign to discredit non crazy right voices. Speaker 0: Pat Buchanan is part of the reason it's so hard to have that conversation because he discredits it by his by his presence. Speaker 1: That's a campaign to destroy credible voices on the right, and Fuentes is part of it. Speaker 0: And that he believes in conspiracies and and that he believes that the Jews are this sinister, secretly organized force trying to affect American politics. And those aren't discussions I think normal people sober people should be having. Speaker 1: Anyway, like, who is this kid exactly? Mhmm. And maybe it's just an accident that the guy goes after, exclusively goes after people who are in the same, roughly the same. And then he gets up there and he's like, you know, making Holocaust jokes. Speaker 0: When attacked, he can always fall back on the line, well, the, you know, the tiny cabal that controls American politics doesn't like me because I speak truth to power. This is actually incidentally almost verbatim what he said the other day that I offend the plutocracy, that I'm a wanted man by the inside the Beltway people, and in in in every sense cast himself as a as a victim who is sort of a Karen Silkwood of politics. Someone who's so truthful that he's being hunted down by the by the conspiracy that runs Washington. I mean, it's it's all a bit much.
Saved - August 7, 2025 at 4:57 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I discussed Tucker Carlson's father, Dick, who was involved with the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies, a pro-Israel think tank supported by wealthy Jewish donors. I questioned Tucker's recent claims about the Israel lobby, given his father's connections. I also reflected on Rush Limbaugh's significant role in promoting conservatism while rarely addressing Jewish influence, despite his past visit to Israel and interactions with notable figures. The conversation included various reactions and interactions with followers, highlighting differing perspectives on these topics.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

1/ Tucker Carlson’s dad, Dick, sat on the board of FDD—Foundation For The Defense Of Democracies—a pro-israel think tank bankrolled by ultra-wealthy jewish donors from MEGA, the jewish billionaires club that ran Jeffrey Epstein. Receipts at the end of the video. https://t.co/DtdmJZeXCI

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker is the vice chairman of the Foundation for Defense of Democracies (FDD), a counterterrorism think tank founded after 9/11. FDD is bipartisan and nonpartisan, with offices in Washington and Brussels. The organization runs programs supporting pluralism and democracy while opposing terrorism. The speaker says FDD is a daily player in the war of words and ideas related to terrorism and has been effective in addressing the threat. Tucker Carlson is identified as the speaker's son, who works at MSNBC and is a writer. Another son, Buckley Carlson, lives in Washington and works for Frank Luntz and also produces a radio show for the speaker on WMAL.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What are you doing right now? I'm vice chairman of a counterterrorism think tank. It's called Foundation for the Defense of Democracy. It's becoming sort of well known, I think, because we are sort of a daily player in the war of words and the war of ideas relative to terrorism. We're here in Washington. We do have an office in Brussels. We run a lot of programs that are in support of pluralism and democracy and and opposed to to terrorism, of course. Let me shorten it to the acronym FDD. FDD was started right after nine eleven. Group of people got together. It's bipartisan. It's nonpartisan. We have Democrats and Republicans on the advisory board and on the board itself, and, it was set up to to do something about the threat of terrorism. And I think it's been effective in doing so. And what's your relationship to Tucker Carlson? Tucker Carlson is one of my two sons. Tucker Carlson, is on MSNBC and and actually quite a good writer, I think, is my oldest son. I have a son named Buckley Carlson who lives in Washington. Buckley is a writer and and upholstery. He works for Frank Luntz. He He also works for me. He's the producer of a radio show that I do on WMAL.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

2/ Dick Carlson helped run FDD from 2001-2012. Original donors to FDD included Charles & Edgar Bronfman, who founded MEGA. Michael Steinhardt & Leonard Abramson were MEGA members. Other jewish billionaires like Bernard Marcus, Sheldon Adelson & Paul Singer, who aligned closely with the MEGA circle, were also big donors to FDD during Dick Carlson's tenure.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

3/ But yeah, we're just supposed to believe that Tucker recently became aware of the israel lobby last year. Do you believe him? I don't.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

4/ What if I told you Rush Limbaugh kissed the wall? https://t.co/5LdmTEQQyI

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

1/ Yesterday, I told you about Bill Buckley and how he was an intelligence operative who promoted modern Conservativism & helped restrain the radical elements on the Right. Today, I bring you Rush Limbaugh. At his peak, Rush had an audience of 50 million weekly listeners. For 33 years on the radio he was perhaps the greatest champion of conservatism in the country. He helped launch the entire "Right-wing talk radio phenomenon." Guys like Sean Hannity, Glenn Beck, Dennis Prager and Mark Levin owe a great debt to him. He wrote books, published a newsletter and even had a television show. Always championing "Conservatism." But in all those years, he barely spoke of jews & certainly never called out jewish power or jewish supremacy. Little known fact, in 1993, Limbaugh made the trip to israel, visited the holo caust museum with Benjamin Netanyahu, and touched the wall. jews credit him with helping mainstream support for israel within the conservative movement. Sometimes I wonder what else happened on that 5-day tour that was never reported? Especially since it was in the era where no one was aware of the Epstein-style blackmail operations israel was engaged in.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

5/ interesting! https://t.co/aMXQBJN19l

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

How's that pizza, Tucker? https://t.co/Ledr06PqLs

@SamParkerSenate - Sam Parker 🇺🇲

Wait, so Tucker's CIA dad worked with the Jeffrey Epstein MEGA Group billionaires for over a decade? Lol. And Tucker wants us to think he's recently become aware of the israel issue? Do you still believe Tucker is on our side? https://t.co/2L4xVknryR

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@IanMalcolm84 Thank you very much, kind sir. You're an absolute scholar yourself.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@AXLnDAVY He's been protecting them a long time

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@Jetmonty You sound retarded. Or are you just a jewbot?

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@LegateSilva YW

Saved - September 17, 2025 at 4:02 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I addressed some misinformation circulating online about the TPUSA Hamptons event, clarifying it was held at a hotel, not my home, and that I covered costs without any NDAs involved. I shared my thoughts on the criticism from Tucker Carlson, emphasizing I have no connection to Jeffrey Epstein and detailing my professional journey to my current net worth. I also discussed my investment strategies and philanthropic efforts. Lastly, I initiated a conversation on whether young people should buy or rent, referencing a prior economic discussion.

@BillAckman - Bill Ackman

A few facts, corrections, and receipts to dispel some misinformation going around social media: The @TPUSA Hamptons event was not held at my house, but rather at a hotel in Bridgehampton. As I previously explained, I did cover the cost of the event, ie, travel, food, and lodging for the participants. This was not a secret event and no one signed an NDA. Everyone including the Turning Point representatives who attended are totally free to share whatever they want about what took place and what was discussed. This was not a ‘Chatham House rules’ event. Some have already publicly shared their experiences and perspectives on the convening. In the spirit of transparency I encourage any of the other attendees that have not already shared their thoughts on the event to do so. That said, I understand why some may not want to do so because of the fear of getting attacked by the mob who assume that something untoward took place. I am sure there are some Israel supporters of TPUSA who became upset with Charlie because he told me so. He complained to me that some pro-Israel advocates view any criticism of Israel as antisemitic and we both agreed that this is wrong. I did not complain to Charlie about @TuckerCarlson’s criticism of me at TPUSA. I did ask him why he thought Tucker attacked me and he told me that he did not know why. He told me that he thought my statement in response to Tucker was ‘a great one.’ It can be found here: https://t.co/xN4aINfSHJ I have been reluctant to post private texts, but in an effort to put this whole thing to bed I share the following brief exchange with Charlie. And when reading this text exchange, ask yourself whether Charlie sounds like someone who I threatened, blackmailed and/or was the subject of an ‘intervention’ about Israel or otherwise. Lastly, I totally understand the shock and distress that all who knew or followed @charliekirk11 are feeling after his untimely and tragic death, but let’s not let those emotions cause us to construct conspiracy theories that can cause innocent people serious and potentially deadly harm. One tragic and devastating loss is enough.

@BillAckman - Bill Ackman

@TuckerCarlson went on a rant yesterday @TPUSA and suggested that I was in Jeffrey Epstein’s ‘constellation of people’ who have been getting away with scams. His evidence is that ‘the most useless people have no actual skills become billionaires.” He referred to me as an example of one of the most useless billionaires in Jeffrey Epstein’s constellation: “[C]an you answer the question: ‘How did Bill Ackman get $9 billion?’ Bill Ackman, a pretty impressive guy? I know Bill Ackman. No. Bill Ackman is like well-connected and super aggressive; that’s it. I think well connected, super aggressive people deserve a fair living like everybody else, but if you are accruing nine [billion] dollars just because you are willing to do anything, I don’t know why we have to pretend that that is good.” In order to address Tucker’s defamatory statements, I thought it would be useful to share a few facts: I never met Jeffrey Epstein, flew on his planes, went to any of his parties and/or properties, or interacted with him ever. When my wife was a professor at MIT, she received a $125,000 grant from Epstein (prior to my knowing of her existence). She met Epstein once for 45 minutes at the request of the head of the MIT MediaLab, made a presentation about her work, and later got a grant. That was the last time she ever met or spoke to Jeffrey Epstein. If this is why Tucker thinks I am in Jeffrey Epstein’s constellation, it’s clear he doesn’t know anything about astronomy. With respect to how I generated a net worth of more than $9 billion, I share the following: I inherited good genes from wonderful parents who instilled good values in me. I never received an allowance so I worked odd jobs washing and waxing cars, digging ditches, lawn and tree care, etc. for pocket money beginning when I was about 10. My parents gave me a huge head start by paying for my education including college and business school. I paid for my housing and expenses, and they paid for my tuition. I worked through college selling advertising for the Let’s Go Harvard Student Travel Guides. I learned a lot about sales working in a basement of a dorm smiling and dialing small hostels, hotels, and car rental companies around the world selling ads to strangers. After college I went to work for my dad’s real estate mortgage brokerage company. I received a $40,000 draw and generated more than $600,000 in commissions in 18 months, making me one of the largest, if not the largest producer during my short term there. I received only 15% of the commissions I generated which contributed to my choosing to pursue an alternative career as an investor, and went to business school to learn more about investing. When I graduated from business school, my parents gave me $100,000 in a settlor trust. My dad said that I would never inherit anything more as he wanted me to 'make it on my own.' The funds never left the trust, and I don’t include them in my net worth. My good economic fortune comes largely from compounding, that is, investing over the long term and building a successful investment business. I started a hedge fund called Gotham Partners when I graduated from business school. I guess you could call me aggressive, but I wasn’t well connected then so my strategy was to cold call super rich people that I found on the Forbes 400 list to raise money. I called about 100 or more people and managed to get 25 or so meetings and raise $2.8 million from six people. Four of the six were on the Forbes list. One was a guy my then-girlfriend (eventually my first wife’s) mother sold an apartment to, and another was the father of a classmate from business school. My dad initially refused to invest, calling the launch of a hedge fund with no experience a stupid idea, but when he saw other much wealthier people commit, he put in $200,000. Gotham Partners, as we called it, generated strong returns with ultimately $500 million under management, but it had a somewhat ignominious end 10 years later. We had shorted MBIA and bought CDS on the company, and I wrote a white paper on why the company did not deserve its triple-A credit rating (briem.com/files/Ackman_M…). MBIA did not like it and went after us aggressively, catalyzing an investigation by Eliot Spitzer. We ended up winding up the fund and I dealt with regulators for a year or so. The Gotham investors ultimately did well and nearly all invested in a new fund I launched about a year later called Pershing Square. (Eventually I got a near apology note from the SEC after I recreated the MBIA CDS short at Pershing Square and it blew up during the Great Financial Crisis. See: The Confidence Game by Christine Richard) I was able to launch Pershing Square due to backing from Joe Steinberg and Ian Cumming of Leucadia National Corporation, which in 2013 merged with Jefferies. I met Joe during my early real estate career and we did a number of co-investments with him at Gotham Partners including a co-investment in our MBIA short and CDS position. Joe and Ian, i.e., Leucadia invested $50 million along with my $4 million to launch Pershing Square. Without their backing, Pershing Square would have been an improbable launch in light of the cloud over me due to the windup of Gotham Partners and the regulatory investigation for which I did not get formal closure until a year or so later. I offered Joe and Ian 20% of the Pershing Square management company as a thank you for their commitment, and they wouldn't take it. My net worth today comes from three principal assets: 1. My initial investment in the Pershing Square funds has increased 56 times since Pershing Square’s inception due to compounding. I also increased my investment in the Pershing Square funds over time by reinvesting incentive fees net of taxes that I earned from our investors, and in 2017 during a rough patch, I doubled down by borrowing $300 million and investing more. My investment in the Pershing Square funds today is worth about $2.5 billion 2. The management company which employs me and the rest of the Pershing Square team has become a very profitable business over time. I started Pershing Square with de minimis capital. We sold a 10% interest in the business last year to strategic investors at a $9.5 billion pre-money valuation. I own about half of the Pershing Square management company, the value of which grows as we compound the value of the funds we manage. My interest in the Pershing Square management company is worth about $6.5 billion today. Pershing Square has generated one of the best investment track records of any investment firm over the last 21 and one-half years, generating 2.9 times the return of the S&P 500 over the same period net of all fees and expenses. While Tucker may believe investment management is a useless activity, I expect our investors would say otherwise. Furthermore, our approach to investing is not just buying and selling securities. We have been an active and engaged investor since we launched, and have played a major role in turning around poorly managed, troubled, and/or bankrupt companies with Canadian Pacific, Chipotle, and General Growth being good examples of this activity. Our investment approach has benefited all of the stakeholders of the company’s in which we have invested, including shareholders, employees, customers, and the communities in which they operate. While not all of our investments have been successful, the substantial majority of our active investments have generated large returns for shareholders. Our biggest loss was a passive investment in Valeant Pharmaceuticals where another activist led the board of directors and drove the strategic direction of the company. So much for passive investments. While we have generated excellent returns for our investors, we have made substantially more money for the other public shareholders who invested alongside us over the last 21 years, and we don’t charge them any fees. We are typically a less than 10% owner of the companies in which we invest so more than 90% of the value we have helped create has gone to the investing public. We have been an important leader and innovator in the shareholder activist movement, which has led to a greater balance of power between shareholders, management and boards. I believe a meaningful driver of our country’s economic and stock market outperformance over the last 20 years versus our global competitors has been driven by shareholder activism, as many new shareholder activists have followed in our footsteps and accelerated value creation in Corporate America improving management, governance, capital allocation, operational efficiency, and driving long-term shareholder value creation. 3. The balance of my assets are in mostly private investments. I have been an active investor in start-ups. I was a day-one investor in Coupang and have invested a few hundred million in other start-ups and venture funds. My original $2.5 million investment in Coupang in 2009 became a billion dollars in 2021, which I gave to the Pershing Square Foundation and other philanthropies. My start up investment activity has contributed to technology innovation, job growth, wealth creation, as well as scientific innovation in biotechnology and other fields. I have also invested directly in real estate, private companies as well as a few funds. The Pershing Square Foundation and affiliated DAFs have granted over $900 million to various causes (see my response to @cernovich https://t.co/YFHhaPyi9z) and have about $900 million of uncommitted assets. So, in short, I got a huge start with great parents, and a wonderful education paid for by mom and dad. Despite Tucker’s statements to the contrary, there were no scams and a lot of useful activity behind the wealth I have created. Tucker says he knows me. In short, we have had only two interactions. Five years ago, he put on a show claiming I committed market manipulation and he did so without calling me to check the facts. When I sent him a detailed letter proving his allegations were entirely false, he called me. On the call, I addressed every one of his additional questions to his apparent satisfaction. He didn’t quite apologize, but he said he would write something up and read it on his show later that night to clear the record. I thanked him for offering to do so. Unfortunately, he did not keep his word. Six months or so later, he again made the same false accusation on one of his shows. I think he largely did so to taunt me into coming on the show as he offered me an opportunity for rebuttal if I came on when I reached out for a correction. He has also asked me to come on his show multiple times on other topics, particularly as the issues I focused on became more aligned with his views, but I refused to come on his show until he cleared the record, which he never did. I actually used to enjoy Tucker’s show on Fox. I thought he raised important issues and had interesting guests. Now he has gone off the reservation, in particular about Iran, Israel, and the Middle East. Some say his politics relate to where his business’ funding comes from and some say he just doesn’t like Jews. I have no idea what motivates him and why he appears to be a changed man. I was an early and strong proponent of President Trump’s ultimate decision to take out Iran’s nuclear capability, which Tucker opposed, and I have been a strong voice in support of Israel so perhaps that’s why he attacked me yesterday. Tucker owes me an apology. I know I am not going to get one because he is not man enough to care about the truth. At least, that’s been my experience with him. With respect to Tucker's tens or hundreds of millions, it would be great for him to explain how he is contributing to society with the work that he does. While useless billionaires are bad, harmful millionaires are definitively worse.

@BillAckman - Bill Ackman

@Cernovich .@Cernovich, this is totally absurd. I have been a centrist my entire life. I have given ~ $50 million, not billions, to @Harvard. The funds went to fund chairs in behavioral economics, to Paul Farmer for global health care initiatives, and to the rowing team. I have given

@LauraLoomer - Laura Loomer

Bill Ackman @BillAckman is a great guy and he supports President Trump and uses his money to make the world a better place. Leave it to @TuckerCarlson to single out a billionaire and demonize him simply because he is….JEWISH. Ackman is a very nice guy and Tucker just wants https://t.co/w4Xi6A5Nrq

@BillAckman - Bill Ackman

Here is the beginning of the discussion where I am following up on whether young people should buy or rent which was discussed in depth during the economic discussion I led. You will note the text exchange took place on August 15th: https://t.co/yAnn5RqySj

Saved - October 2, 2025 at 3:18 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Tucker Carlson addressed the misconception that God favors a specific group, asserting that the true "Chosen People" are those who choose Jesus. I criticized figures like Lindsey Graham for suggesting that failing to support the secular government of Israel has dire consequences, emphasizing that this is not the Christian message.

@MJTruthUltra - MJTruthUltra

Tucker Carlson went there… The Oldest of Christian Heresies is that God somehow prefers “The Chosen People”— “No, The Only Chosen People are those who choose Jesus. PERIOD.” But daily, we have people like Lindsey Graham in Congress telling everyone that if you don’t support the SECULAR Government of Israel, God will Kill You. That is NOT the Christian Message. https://rumble.com/v6zqx8y-the-oldest-of-christian-heresys-is-that-god-somehow-prefers-the-chosen-peop.html

Video Transcript AI Summary
To restore balance between the US and Israel and sane public conversation, the speaker says we must get our theology right. This message is aimed at Christians—the largest group of Israel supporters in the US—whose view is colored by a Christian heresy: that God prefers some people based on DNA. The chosen people, he argues, are 'the people who choose Jesus' and that is the universal Christian message. He cites Lindsey Graham and others, calling this 'not Christianity' and 'heresy.' Examples: 'Israel is our friend. They're the most reliable friend we have in the Mideast.' 'This is not a hard choice if you're an American.' 'If America pulls the plug on Israel, god will pull the plug on us.' 'God will kill you if you don't support Bibi Netanyahu.' He contends this uses God as a weapon, and 'the killing of the innocent' is forbidden; 'that person is committing heresy.'
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And the last thing that I think we need to do to restore balance between the relationship between The United States and Israel and to restore some sanity to the public conversation on this topic is to get our theology right. And this is not a message aimed at Israelis or Jews. This is a message aimed at Christians who are the largest group of Israel supporters in The United States. And their view of Israel is colored not just by a sentimental attachment, which is fine, or trips to Israel, great, no problem, But by a Christian heresy, the oldest of the Christian heresies, which is that God somehow prefers some people based on their DNA. And, of course, the whole point of Christianity is that that is no longer true, that there is no chosen people. The chosen people are people who choose Jesus. That is the Christian message right there. It's not an anti Semitic message, by the way. It's the Christian message. It's the core Christian message. And yet there are many, many self described representatives of the Christian faith, the world's largest, who are daily sending a different message. And we should be very clear. Whatever this is, it's not Christianity. It is heresy. And among the many examples we could pick, we're gonna go, because we couldn't control ourselves, with Lindsey Graham. Watch. Speaker 1: To people in my party, I'm tired of this crap. Israel is our friend. They're the most reliable friend we have in the Mideast. They're a democracy surrounded by people who would cut their throats if they could. This is not a hard choice if you're an American. It's not a hard choice if you're Speaker 0: a Christian. Speaker 1: A word of warning. If America pulls the plug on Israel, god will pull the plug on us. Speaker 0: God will kill you if you don't support Bibi Netanyahu. That's what he's saying. And there are cheers, unfortunately. Cheers when he said that god will kill you. He will pull the plug on you like a quadriplegic in intensive care. You're gonna flatline unless you support the secular abortion on demand government of Israel. That's the Christian perspective, really. That God loves some people more because of their DNA. That is not the Christian message. That's the opposite of the Christian message. The Christian message is universal. That's the whole point of it. The chosen people in Christianity are those who choose Jesus. The entire New Testament is that story. And anyone who says otherwise has not read it or is lying. God does not prefer you because of your DNA or anyone else because of their DNA, period. So the fact that people can stand up in The United States in 2025 and say something like that, and by the way, not even make the case, Just invoke the power of god as a weapon. He will kill you. He'll pull the plug on your country unless you go along with this. We need more war. Listen to yourself. And it's not just Lindsey Graham. It's the speaker of the house, Mike Johnson. It's a lot of people, some of whom are very nice people. People have dinner with him. They seem perfectly normal. But this is a heresy, and it's deranged. And you know it's deranged because it's a justification for killing the innocent. And in Christianity, if there's one thing that's crystal clear, it's that Christians cannot abide the killing of the innocent. People who have done nothing wrong cannot be killed. That's a sin. You are not allowed to do that, period. And if you find anyone leveraging the message of Jesus to justify the killing of innocents, that person is committing heresy.

@MJTruthUltra - MJTruthUltra

Tucker Carlson: If Israel is our greatest Ally, why in the world are they Transferring US Military Technology to CHINA? Why does China have a significant stake in the Port of Haifa, Israel’s biggest port? — China's involvement in Israel's Port of Haifa is limited to the Shanghai International Port Group (SIPG) operating the Haifa Bayport Terminal, a modern container terminal, under a 25-year concession (2021–2046) Tucker goes on to say Netanyahu openly brags about having control over Trump and the United States — Highlighting that Trump understands he’s losing some support over Israel, and he’s had enough. https://rumble.com/v6zqvtu-israel-is-our-greatest-ally-why-in-the-world-are-they-transferring-us-milit.html

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 argues that Israel is 'our greatest ally' and that 'we should never ask anything of them,' while claiming 'Israel has a long history of transferring military technology, including American military technology to China' and that 'China is running the Port Of Haifa, Israel's biggest port.' He contends loyalty is one-way, and that Netanyahu 'has pushed it too far' by claiming 'I control Donald Trump. I control the United States Congress. I control The United States.' The clip shows Trump pushing back on annexing the West Bank, saying, 'I will not allow Israel to annex the West Bank. No. I will not allow it. It's not gonna happen.' The piece links waning support, especially among young voters, to humiliation from 'a tiny foreign power,' concluding, 'That's why Donald Trump has lost support over this Israel question, and he knows that, and he's pushing back.'
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Which is gone. I mean, just give you one more example of the humiliation, which is almost beyond belief. So Israel's our greatest ally. We should never ask anything of them. Of course, you you heard Nikki Haley. You hear all of them say exactly the same thing. Protecting Israel's most important thing. They're our only real ally. If they're our only real ally, why does Israel have a long history of transferring military technology, including American military technology to China? To China? Most people have no idea that's true. It is true. Why is China running the Port Of Haifa, Israel's biggest port? Really, if they're such a close ally. And, of course, the answer is because from Israel's perspective, we're not a close ally. We're a country that has been willing to help them. But when you only have 9,000,000 people and a limited defense budget, you know, you take help where you can get it. So the loyalty is not requited. It's one way. And I think the good news is that the governor of Israel, in particular, the prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu, has pushed it too far. And he did that in part by running around, telling people what he thought was true apparently. I control Donald Trump. I control the United States Congress. I control The United States. He said that to political allies and opponents in his country. He said it to foreign heads of state. Fact. I control these people. Don't you worry. And by the way, if you kick me out of office, the next guy probably won't have the level of control that I have. He's made that case openly, verbally. He said it out loud. And that was too much for our president. And so in one of the great moments, it was just who say? It was a cool shower on a hot day. President Trump pushed back, not directly, but you can watch this clip and see that he's had enough. Here is president Trump the other day asked about Israel's plans to annex the West Bank. Watch. Speaker 1: Did you promise leaders this week that you would not allow Israel to annex the West Bank? Is that something that you I will I will not allow Israel to annex the West Bank. No. I will not allow it. It's not gonna happen. Did you speak with Netanyahu about this directly? But I'm not gonna allow it. Whether I spoke to him or not, I did. But I'm not allowing Israel to annex the West Bank. Speaker 0: Mister Speaker 1: Obin There's been enough. It's time to stop. Speaker 0: It's been enough. I will not allow it. He's not just talking about the West Bank there, obviously. These are political people. They understand when your poll numbers fall dramatically, particularly among the young men who help make you president, you have to ask why is that? And it's about this issue. Because it's too humiliating. And people who don't wanna see their government bossed around by a tiny foreign power are not haters. They don't hate any ethnic group. They just don't wanna be humiliated. And by the way, why should they be humiliated? That's the core problem right there. That's why Donald Trump has lost support over this Israel question, and he knows that, and he's pushing back. And there's just no question from that clip whatsoever.

@MJTruthUltra - MJTruthUltra

Tucker Carlson goes SCORCHED EARTH on Bibi Netanyahu for saying American’s are part of the “Woke Reich” and bragging on Camera about his Efforts to Censor Americans https://rumble.com/v6zqusg-tucker-carlson-goes-scorched-earth-on-bibi-netanyahu.html https://t.co/4qxVWeHN4L

Video Transcript AI Summary
They're not even pretending to such an extent that the prime minister of Israel goes on television to openly participate and meddle in internal American politics, taking sides, attacking people, Americans. I call it the woke reich. And secondly, we're gonna have to use the tools of battle and the most important ones are social media. Five followers. TikTok. TikTok. One. Number one. Oh, Alex. X. You know, so we have to talk to Elon. He's not an enemy. He's a friend. We should talk to him. We pushed congress to force a TikTok sale. The only reason we have free speech in The United States right now is because of Elon Musk. Free speech is central to the entire idea of America. This is not a sophisticated propaganda campaign. This is a brutal and brutish propaganda campaign where anyone who disagrees with anything is immediately slandered and smeared.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: They're not even pretending to such an extent that the prime minister of Israel goes on television to openly participate and meddle in internal American politics, taking sides, attacking people, Americans. You wouldn't think it would be his business. He's not an American leader. He's not even an American citizen. Going on television to attack Americans because they're not fully on board with sending billions more to a country of 9,000,000 people? And in case you think that's an overstatement, here is the prime minister of Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu, commenting on American politics. Speaker 1: Talked about the woke right, and he said, I call it the woke reich. That's a brilliant I don't know if the woke reich because these people, you know, they're not any different from the woke left, I mean, insane here in the movies. But they're actually meeting on some of the things. We have to fight back. How do we fight back? Our influencers. I think you should also talk to them if you have a chance. To that that community. They're very important. And secondly, we're gonna have to use the tools of battle and the most important ones are social media. And the most important purchase that is going on right now is class Followers. Speaker 0: Five followers. TikTok. Speaker 1: TikTok. One. Number one. And I hope it goes through because it's it can be consequential. Mhmm. And the other one what's the other one that's most important? Speaker 0: Oh, Alex. X. Speaker 1: X. X. Speaker 0: Very Speaker 1: good. You know, so we have to talk to Elon. He's not an enemy. He's a friend. We should talk to him. Now if we can get those two things, we get locked and I could go on on other things, but that's not the point right now. We have to fight the fight. Speaker 0: It's almost unbelievable that he said that on camera. Imagine. This is a foreign leader bragging about how he censoring Americans. Again, this guy runs a country of 9,000,000 people that's totally dependent on our tax dollars to exist. And here he is on camera, he's a sophisticated guy. He of course, he knows that he's being filmed saying, anyone who opposes me in The United States who opposes more aid to Israel or opposes getting sucked into war with Iran, which does not serve American interest, that person is not simply mistaken or wrong. I'm not gonna bother to explain why that person is wrong. That person is a Nazi, part of the woke Reich, a Nazi. And the only way to fix it is by preventing Americans in the last country on Earth with guaranteed freedom of speech, prevent Americans from hearing the other side. And so we push congress to force a TikTok sale, which is true, by the way. And when that happened and various members of congress said, no. Really, it's about China. There were people in line who said, no. I think it's really about Israel. You you you kinda wish it was about China. Here he is just admitting. No. No. No. We pushed the US congress to censor in The United States to commit censorship in The United States because we think it's bad for us, and we need to talk to Elon. The only reason we have free speech in The United States right now is because of Elon Musk. By the way, a naturalized American, a foreigner who looked at The United States and said, what's great about that country? People can say what they believe because they're not slaves. They're not subjects of the state. They're citizens of a nation that they own. Free speech is central to the entire idea of America. In fact, it's really the only thing that sets us apart from any other country on Earth. It's not our market economy. It's freedom of speech. And here's this guy, a foreign head of state who, let me restate, is totally dependent on our tax dollars to exist, is saying Americans don't have that right, and he's gonna do some kind of secret pressure campaign on Elon Musk to censor x because it bothers Israel. You know, that's the point at which you just say no. Absolutely not. That is not allowed. But since no one has said that, it has continued. And that's why when you go on social media, you see person after person taking that guy's line. That guy's line. Repeating foreign government talking points on social media as Americans. Oh, you're you can't say that. It's true. It's a 100% true. And it's also totally counterproductive, by the way. This is not a sophisticated propaganda campaign. This is a brutal and brutish propaganda campaign where anyone who disagrees with anything is immediately slandered and smeared.
Saved - November 20, 2025 at 7:42 PM

@GiganteRicardo9 - Ricardo Gigante

Alternatively, what you’ll GET is ‘the fuck out of our country before you can’t,’ you traitorous cunt.

@Fair_and_Biased - Jackie Chea ⚖️

Alternatively, I’d take silence/neutrality. What really puts a bee in my bonnet, though, is that she’s playing defense for Tucker – taking a clear side against those who criticize him.

@LaibelWeiner - Laibel Weiner

For the 100th time @megynkelly, we are not asking for "condemnation". We want to hear the following sentence: "I don't agree with Tucker for platforming a rabid anti-semite and conveniently not challenging him on anything. He should have been a bit tougher. Tucker has had a https://t.co/pg6QWaVbF3

View Full Interactive Feed