reSee.it - Related Post Feed

Saved - January 21, 2025 at 6:04 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Ahead of Trump's mass deportation plan, I learned that Augsburg University sent a letter to staff directing them to deny entry to law enforcement, including ICE, and to cancel classes if they feel uncomfortable. Staff are also instructed to tell students to ignore any questions from officers.

@libsoftiktok - Libs of TikTok

NEW: Ahead of Trump’s mass deportation plan, @AugsburgU sent a letter to staff instructing them to refuse entry to law enforcement agencies including ICE, not provide ICE with any information, and to cancel classes if they feel uncomfortable when confronted by ICE. They are also told to instruct students to ignore officers if they ask them questions.

Saved - January 22, 2025 at 9:03 PM

@libsoftiktok - Libs of TikTok

Nurse at a Dallas-Fort Worth hospital in Texas posts threatening message toward ICE officers and instructs other hospital staff on how to ignore ICE agents if they show up at hospitals. CC @RealTomHoman https://t.co/cpWIsUSAjd

Saved - January 23, 2025 at 10:24 PM

@libsoftiktok - Libs of TikTok

This teacher says it'll be a "frozen day in hell" before she lets ICE officers come into her classroom. Trump authorized ICE to operate in schools. Obstructing law enforcement is a crime. https://t.co/0q32HkqS8E

Video Transcript AI Summary
I firmly believe that no one from ICE will ever come into my classroom to remove a student, especially since I have no undocumented students. Even if I did, the Plyler v. Doe ruling ensures that everyone is entitled to a free and appropriate education. I'm currently engaged in teaching and cannot answer the door right now. You'll have to come back later, which means never, because I stand firmly against any actions that threaten my students' rights.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I just wanna say with my entire fucking chest and 10 toes down on my shitty broken tile classroom floor that it will be a cold, no, frozen, day in hell before someone from ICE comes in my classroom to remove a student they suspect is undocumented first because I have no undocumented students. What are you talking about second even if I did? 1980 2 Plyer versus Doe says that it does not matter. Everyone is entitled to fair fair and a free appropriate education. And that's what I'm here to do. I'm so sorry. I can't come to my door right now. We're learning. We're doing class stuff. You're gonna have to come back later. And by later, I mean never because there are hills that I will die on, and this is one.
Saved - January 31, 2025 at 1:39 AM

@DecentBackup - BackupDecentFiJC

👺PLOT TWIST: Illegal immigrants have no such rights. I’m sorry this is happening to Jew.

@David_J_Bier - David J. Bier

A useful resource. Don't talk except to say: "I do not consent to searches. Am I being detained? I want a lawyer." Don't open the door without seeing a warrant signed by a judge.

Saved - January 31, 2025 at 4:31 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I received a notice from an NYPD source indicating that NYPD officers are restricted from engaging with ICE agents, except for special units. Sanctuary city policies allow for the deportation of migrants convicted of certain crimes, yet there seems to be confusion about enforcement. Additionally, notices sent to migrant shelters instruct employees to stall ICE agents, warning that this could lead to obstruction charges. Legal experts advise caution, as following these instructions may have serious consequences.

@ViralNewsNYC - Viral News NYC

🚨I received this notice from an NYPD source 🚨 This is what was sent to the desk at PCT, restricting NYPD officers from engaging or assisting ICE agents . I believe only special NYPD units can interact with ICE agents. _________________________________ Furthermore , as per sanctuary city policies , there is a list of 171 laws that if a migrant breaks and is convicted, law enforcement agencies can already turn those criminals into ICE to have them deported. ( I'm unclear why we haven't done this already) Also, with compliance with the sanctuary city laws, if a migrant is a public safety threat and either is connected with terrorists or dangerous gangs, the NYPD is allowed to communicate with ICE agents . A lot of confusion has been floating about on what NYPD officers can do with ICE. It's appears it's policies over Sanctuary City Laws .

@ViralNewsNYC - Viral News NYC

🚨This was sent into multiple migrant shelters and hotels throughout NYC 🚨 It's telling employees of migrants shelters not to work and pretty much stall federal agents from entering migrant shelter. This was sent in from a source at a migrant shelter. https://t.co/bXYZ9IJjqs

@ViralNewsNYC - Viral News NYC

Another notice sent to migrant shelters and hotels telling the employees to stall ICE agents if they show up . https://t.co/LGyLCMWQX6

@ViralNewsNYC - Viral News NYC

🚨 ICE Warning notice at NYC Migrant Hotel ⚠️A notice advises staff to question ICE agents, make phone calls, and delay their actions. ⚠️Legal experts warn this could lead to obstruction charges. Following such instructions could have serious consequences. (Sent in by a different source at a different shelter in NYC )

Saved - February 4, 2025 at 8:35 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I discovered that the NGO "Make The Road NY" has received over $16 million in government grants while actively training illegal aliens on how to avoid deportation and deceive ICE agents. They've been filmed coaching individuals to lie and not cooperate with law enforcement. Their financial disclosures reveal significant revenue from various government sources, including the Department of Homeland Security. I'm sharing this information to raise awareness about their activities and funding.

@nataliegwinters - Natalie Winters

Hi @DOGE, I think we found another one. Open borders NGO “Make The Road NY” has received over $16,000,000 in government grants while actively training illegal aliens how to avoid deportation and lie to ICE agents. 🧵🧵🧵

@nataliegwinters - Natalie Winters

The far-left, tax-exempt NGO was filmed coaching illegal aliens on how to lie to ICE agents to avoid deportation. The group also published a Deportation Defense Manual with a hotline to dox ongoing ICE raids. https://t.co/gjtFJj7sSd

Video Transcript AI Summary
Trump 2.0 presents new challenges, but people are more aware of their rights than ever. We will create strong communities as a form of resistance. Imagine a guardian in her home without a keyhole but with a window; the door is locked, and no one inside has a deportation order. It's crucial to understand that there will never be enough lawyers to ensure our safety. Therefore, these training sessions are essential for building muscle memory, similar to how children practice fire drills. We want to instill a reflexive response, so when the time comes, individuals can act without hesitation.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Trump 2.0 is a different beast than Trump 1.0, but people know their rights now more than ever, and we will build towns and cities. We will build fortresses of resistance. So I'm gonna paint the scene. Guardian is in her home. She doesn't have a keyhole, but she does have a window. The door does have a lock, and there is nobody in the home that has a deportation order. So. There will never be enough lawyers in this movement to keep us safe. And so it is incredibly important that we remember that these trainings are like muscle memory. The same way children do fire drills, and now, they walk out of the school, and they're texting, they're not even thinking. That's the sort of muscle memory we wanna build here.

@nataliegwinters - Natalie Winters

The group is advising illegal aliens to lie to ICE agents and “not open the door” to any law enforcement officials who show up at their homes. https://t.co/bC3rSrQTIb

@nataliegwinters - Natalie Winters

Their most recent financial disclosures show $16,124,582 listed in revenue from government grants. The parent organization “Make The Road States” counts an additional $2,000,000+. https://t.co/sMfOXjOnVp

@nataliegwinters - Natalie Winters

Make the Road NY has received a several grants from @DHS, @USCIS, @DOJ, and @HHSGov. Right now, they’re currently taking in six figure from @DHS. https://t.co/ys5II1V4hz

@nataliegwinters - Natalie Winters

@DOGE please ~do your thing~!

@nataliegwinters - Natalie Winters

@DOGE @threadreaderapp unroll

Saved - February 9, 2025 at 11:09 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
In Rosemead, California, illegal migrants have installed cameras to monitor for ICE activities. During a raid, the US Department of Homeland Security and ICE moved the cameras, causing panic among those filming. I believe DHS and ICE should not be under surveillance by individuals who are in the country illegally and could pose a threat. As the video progresses, they successfully gain entry, highlighting the potential danger if those illegally present were aware of their locations and armed. It's important to remember that these individuals are in the country unlawfully and lack rights.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

Rosemead, California: Illegal migrants have set up cameras outside their property to detect them if ICE is coming US Department of Homeland Security and ICE move the cameras during their raid and the people filming start losing their minds DHS and ICE have every right to not be under surveillance by criminals illegally in our country who could be monitoring their location to do them harm Towards the end of the video they gain entry. Imagine if the illegal knew all their locations and were armed. These people are illegally in our country, they have no rights

Video Transcript AI Summary
Why are they moving the cameras? They’re acting strange, even breaking a window with what looks like a gun. It's crazy! One vest says "ice" on it. We're filming this for my TikTok; it already has 13,000 followers. This is insane – they're breaking into someone's house! It looks like a criminal act, not legitimate police work. They're not reporting this. What's the point of breaking the window when there's a perfectly good door? We're scared they might shoot. Stay back!
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Curious? They're moving the cameras? Up. Why are you moving the cameras for? What are you scared of? What are you scared of? Show your face. Hello? Oh my god. Hold up. That's fine. Speaker 1: Why are they doing that? Speaker 0: They're maggot pumped. That's not me. Speaker 1: Don't tell me that's ice or something. It is? Speaker 0: Pretty sure she's working Speaker 1: with me. Do you follow-up on a meeting? No. Oh, hell no. No. But I have a TikTok with, like, 13,000 followers, and I'm gonna put this on right now. Yeah. That's crazy. I can't believe they're doing this. But they broke the window. Fucking ice. Are you Yeah. It says Speaker 0: ice on the bottom where it says please on this vest. Oh, no. It says Speaker 1: Just breaking it with a little gun thing. There's a oh, no. Yeah. He broke it with his gun. Speaker 0: What Speaker 1: is something s I HSI. Something like that. You said Armani News? Speaker 0: Armani News at Speaker 1: Oh, yeah. Yeah. Yeah. I do. Yeah. I do. Yeah. What are they doing? You can't just they're just breaking in somebody's house. Go on. Tell me not to be Speaker 0: quick. Speaker 1: It's ice, papa. Come in and get the dangerous criminal that was across the street from the park. What's the point of breaking that window and stuff? Like, there's a big ass pit. Speaker 0: Oh my god. I can't believe they're doing this. Speaker 1: I can't believe this is happening. They look like criminals breaking into a house. They're not reporting this on us. So this is not. Speaker 0: Stay over there. Speaker 1: Stay over there. What if they shoot or something? Get over there.
Saved - February 10, 2025 at 3:05 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’ve noticed that pro-open borders NGOs are actively resisting President Trump's ICE raids, and they are funded by substantial amounts of tax dollars. For instance, the U.S. Committee for Refugees and Immigrants has received nearly $376 million, which they use to develop training materials for illegal aliens to evade deportation and to lobby against immigration restrictions. Additionally, the Young Center for Immigrant Children's Rights, with over $11 million in funding, has been involved in lobbying against the Laken Riley Act and organizing against ICE. There are numerous other troubling examples as well.

@nataliegwinters - Natalie Winters

Pro-Open Borders NGOs plotting resistance to President Trump's @ICE raids are funded by hundreds of millions of your tax dollars. The U.S. Committee for Refugees and Immigrants, which has received $375.9 million, is using those funds to create training material for illegal aliens to avoid deportation and *lobby* against President Trump's immigration restrictions. The Young Center for Immigrant Children's Rights, a recipient of over $11 million, lobbied against the Laken Riley Act and engages in community organizing against @ICE. Many many more highly concerning examples.

Saved - February 14, 2025 at 12:14 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared a situation involving my client, who was arrested after entering the U.S. illegally using the CBP App. Despite having an asylum hearing where he was denied, I argue that he is in compliance and that immigration had no grounds for his arrest. I’m advocating for his release back into America. It’s frustrating to see how some people fail to grasp the fundamental issue: he entered the country without legal permission. I wonder about the qualifications of immigration attorneys who overlook such basic points.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

This immigration attorney’s illegal migrant client was arrested - He illegally entered America with the CBP App - She admits he entered WITHOUT INSPECTION - Already had an asylum hearing, he was denied She’s taken to social media to say he’s in compliance and here legally and immigration had no right or grounds to arrest her client, she’s trying to get him released back into America Again, HE ENTERED ILLEGALLY What are the qualifications to be an immigration attorney? How do these people not understand the most basic point here, they are not legally allowed to be here

Video Transcript AI Summary
Hi, everyone, I'm Rhea Chadrigan, an immigration attorney in Houston. I need to share an important story about a client. He had an asylum hearing which was denied, but he filed an appeal, so he is not removable. He has a work permit and has been compliant with ICE, using an app to share his location monthly. Recently, ICE called him, claiming his GPS wasn't working and that they were coming over. When they arrived, DEA agents with guns pulled him outside, threw him to the ground, and detained him in shackles. His daughter described it as a war scene, with excessive resources used on a compliant, non-violent person. It's crucial to get your immigration papers in order and consult with an attorney to explore your options. Everyone should have an immigration attorney on speed dial these days.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hey, guys. My name is Rhea Chadrigan. I am an immigration attorney in Houston, Texas. I'm jumping on here today to share a story. I don't usually post, work things like that on TikTok, but today, I feel like I have to. I was contacted on Tuesday by, the daughter of someone who was detained, and I have his authorization to share the story. And I've been going back and forth. Should I do it? Should I not? Because I don't wanna fear monger, but these really are, unprecedented times and unchartered territory, especially for, you know, people who recently got to practicing. So, this individual that is detained that I'm trying to get released, he had an asylum hearing in September, and it was denied. And he timely filed an appeal, so he's not removable. He cannot be deported. He has a pending asylum case with the Board of Immigration Appeals. And, he has a work permit. He's law abiding. He did enter without inspection. He surrendered to, CBP, and he's taken the ICE custody. He was released on his own recognizance, with ADT reporting requirements, which means he had to, like he has an app on his phone where once a month, he has to take a picture of himself and share his location, and they can track his location from it all the time. So, and he does that on on the thirteenth of every month. And so, when I went to visit him today, I asked him, like, what happened? Can you tell me, like, why you were detained? Because I I really don't understand why. And he told me that or what happened when you were detained? And he told me that, he was at home last Sunday. He woke up. He got a call, from a number, and it was the ice lady that calls and checks in on him and checks up on him and whatever. And, she said, hey. Are you home? Because the GPS and your app, I don't think it's working, blah, blah, blah. And he was like, no, I'm home. Like, everything's fine with my phone. Like, you know, I'm in compliance. I sent my picture, like, what's going on? And she's like, no, everything's fine. Don't worry. I'm just gonna come over in in about ten minutes. He said, okay. And he got up out of bed and, he went and asked his wife to make coffee because this lady was coming. So he said, please, can you make her a cup of coffee? And then, Ice shows up, knocks on his door. He had just put his pants on. He opens the door, and they, they're like, just come outside for a moment. Just come outside for a moment. They I guess they weren't as visual, like, he wasn't able to see them. And he steps out and DEA he sees someone with, like, DEA written on on whatever they're wearing and, guns pulled. They throw him to the ground. They detain him. They put him in shackles, literal shackles. They put handcuffs on his hands and on his feet, and it was all chained together. And he's just like, what's happened? What's happening? Like, you have the wrong guy. Like, I didn't do anything. Like, extremely confused. And, he said, it's cold. Can I just grab a jacket? Because he really didn't think he was gonna be detained. He didn't do anything. He's not a criminal. He's not, you know, none of those things. And he's in compliance with everything. And they grabbed him and they detained him, and he's been detained for about today's the sixth day, and I'm working on trying to get him released. But his daughter told him afterwards once he was detained and he called her, she said, you know, outside, it looked like they were coming to get some, like, huge criminal. It was like a war scene. Like, there were so many officers, so many people, all these resources being used for a nonviolent person who is in compliance with everything he should be doing. He has a work permit. He has a job. He pays taxes. And that just says a lot about the times we're living in. It's time to get your papers together. If you don't have papers, consult with an immigration attorney and find out your options. Sometimes you have options that you don't even know about. There's a lot of people who entered, you know, illegally who are married to US citizens or green card holders. There are waivers available. There might be something that you can do. I'm not saying there is. This is not legal advice. You need you would need a consultation for that, but talk to somebody, even if it's not me. Talk to someone and figure out what to do. And, honestly, at this point, I feel like everybody should have an immigration attorney on speed dial, in case something happens because, you know, they're just doing whatever they want. And I've been really hesitant to post anything about it, but at this point, I don't know what else to do. I don't know what else to do. It's it's just so scary. Yeah.
Saved - February 17, 2025 at 4:38 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’ve uncovered a long list of groups funded by Mark Zuckerberg that are actively working against the Trump presidency through various means, including lawsuits and protests. After exposing his connections to these nonprofits, Zuckerberg sought cover from the New York Times, which only confirms I struck a nerve. Organizations like CASA, Forward US, and Common Justice are among those receiving significant funding to oppose Trump’s immigration policies and promote resistance efforts. I also noted a concerning revision of grant information on Zuckerberg's foundation website, suggesting a cover-up.

@nataliegwinters - Natalie Winters

EXC: Here’s a LONG list of groups funded by Mark Zuckerberg that are actively sabotaging the Trump presidency through lawfare, ICE raid interference, lobbying, and mass protest. Funds comes from the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative or Forward US (founded by Zuck in 2013). 🧵🧵🧵

@nataliegwinters - Natalie Winters

Zuckerberg ran to the @NYTimes for cover after I exposed his ties to nonprofits bankrolling lawsuits against President Trump. You thought this would intimidate me? It proves I hit a nerve.

@nataliegwinters - Natalie Winters

1) CASA is currently suing the Trump administration over their Birthright Citizenship Executive Order. CASA also has an active tip hotline to dox ICE raids and agents. They’ve received at least $250,000 from Forward US. https://t.co/diLvPeEdLE

@nataliegwinters - Natalie Winters

2) Forward US has donated to Make The Road States, which published a “Deportation Defense Manual,” instructing illegal aliens how to avoid ICE raids. This includes instructing them to lie to ICE agents and law enforcement. The group is also suing Trump over mass deportations. https://t.co/7bXk3HSNhR

@nataliegwinters - Natalie Winters

3) Forward US has donated to VoteVets Action Fund, an organization the actively opposed and campaigned against the nomination of @PeteHegseth. They also put out ads attacking Trump’s spending freeze and smeared his immigration crackdown. https://t.co/jljyAn6JYX

@nataliegwinters - Natalie Winters

4) CZI donated at least $500,000 to Common Justice, a far-left group pledging to “resist POTUS’s efforts to criminalize immigration.” Common Justice is also part of Protect Democracy, the leading coalition of left-wing groups suing Trump. https://t.co/vc6zhgtafA

@nataliegwinters - Natalie Winters

5) The Obama alum hotbed think tank - the Center for American Progress - is currently lobbying Congress to “defend America against Trump’s Power Grab” and mobilizing academics and activists to achieve this. CAP belongs to Democracy Forward, the leading legal organization of left-wing groups suing Trump.

@nataliegwinters - Natalie Winters

6) CZI has given $550,000 to the Immigrant Legal Resource Center per @capitalresearch. This group has condemned Trump’s immigration agenda, pledging to “continue to work to defeat Trump’s immigration enforcement priorities.” https://t.co/Cf9biaYd6l

@nataliegwinters - Natalie Winters

7) CZI has given $200,000 to American Immigration Council, an open borders advocacy group that has criticized Trump’s immigration crackdown as “propaganda” and “fearmongering.” They’ve pledged to fight all his Executive Orders. https://t.co/n8qlRLTBLE

@nataliegwinters - Natalie Winters

8) MoveOn, a notorious far-left organizing group, is gathering activists to oppose Trump via mass demonstrations, petitions, and calls to lawmakers. They were a key 2016 Resistance organization. https://t.co/n3zVeClPpJ

@nataliegwinters - Natalie Winters

9) House Majority Forward, which has received $150,000 from Forward US, has cut several anti-Trump ads airing across national media. https://t.co/o0HKsp4NSY

@nataliegwinters - Natalie Winters

10) LUCHA, another Forward US grant recipient, has pledged to “never cede ground” or “back down” against the Trump presidency and their immigration agenda. https://t.co/3Nm9J77sPD

@nataliegwinters - Natalie Winters

11) CZI also supported the Black Alliance for Just Immigration, which opposed the Laken Riley Act claiming it was “anti-black.” https://t.co/zla3kZ1MVm

@nataliegwinters - Natalie Winters

12) CZI has repeatedly given six-figure grants to Haitian Bridge Alliance, which opposed the Laken Riley Act, TPS termination for Venezuelans, and using Gitmo to detain illegal aliens. https://t.co/7ScbAfzwox

@nataliegwinters - Natalie Winters

13) Radical immigration activist group America’s Voice has received $200,000 from Forward US while lobbying against Trump’s “enforcement” of immigration law and attacking his policies as “harmful.” https://t.co/ApxbYrMyF7

@nataliegwinters - Natalie Winters

14) The Justice Action Center has pledged to fight Trump in court over immigration restrictions and has received grants from Forward US. https://t.co/xodKhTvSUg

@nataliegwinters - Natalie Winters

15) The Latin American Association, a Forward US grant recipient, is helping illegal aliens avoid deportation. https://t.co/rqOnSjk2uO

@nataliegwinters - Natalie Winters

16) United We Dream is running several pressure campaigns against lawmakers to ensure they oppose Trump's immigration agenda and is threatening lawsuits. https://t.co/VOgZXNVLm3

@nataliegwinters - Natalie Winters

So, yet again, the @nytimes is wrong. Would you like to update this story @teddyschleifer? https://t.co/UFpLukpCEZ

@nataliegwinters - Natalie Winters

@nytimes @teddyschleifer Also, they're deleting grants from the CZI website! MASSIVE attempted coverup underway. https://t.co/Xr1lYjXFGG

@nataliegwinters - Natalie Winters

🚨🚨🚨 On February 12th, Mark Zuckerberg's foundation website listed over 5,000 grants. We know this consisted overwhelmingly of far-left groups. On the day I exposed Zuckerberg's ties to current anti-Trump activists, the site was revised to list just 680 grants. Many of these far-left donations are now missing, and you can only search from 2024 onward. This is a massive cover up. Archives below ⬇️

@nataliegwinters - Natalie Winters

@nytimes @teddyschleifer @threadreaderapp unroll

Saved - March 19, 2025 at 2:53 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I introduced Ana de Alba, the judge who denied the Trump administration's attempt to fire bureaucrats at six federal agencies. I noted her background as a self-described "lefty liberal from Berkeley," who has worked with the Mexican government to advise undocumented individuals on avoiding deportation. She has been involved with Legal Aid at Work, preparing undocumented workers for ICE raids, and has held "Know Your Rights" lectures for various Central American consulates. I expressed my concern, stating that she seems more like an activist than a judge.

@nataliegwinters - Natalie Winters

🚨Meet the Judge denying the Trump administration’s move to fire bureaucrats at six federal agencies. Ana de Alba is a self-described “lefty liberal from Berkeley” who worked with the Mexican government to advise illegal aliens how to avoid deportation. https://t.co/BjQGaKE4yZ

@nataliegwinters - Natalie Winters

Alba was previously on the Board of Legal Aid at Work, which preps illegal aliens for ICE raids by telling them "do not answer any questions." The group hosts "Know Your Rights" clinics to help illegals avoid deportation. https://t.co/sSphVAvvTG

@nataliegwinters - Natalie Winters

Alba has repeatedly held "Know Your Rights" lecture for "undocumented workers" on behalf of the Consulates of Mexico, El Salvador, Guatemala, and Nicaragua. She was also Counsel to the Consulate of Mexico. https://t.co/NjkzxqxGQI

@nataliegwinters - Natalie Winters

In her own words, she's a "“lefty liberal from Berkeley.” This is not a Judge. This is an activist! https://t.co/qC1SlhrYKE

Saved - April 4, 2025 at 10:37 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Homeland Security has arrested a man who went viral for threatening ICE agents and calling for violence against them. I believe this action demonstrates accountability, and I support efforts to protect our ICE heroes. Additionally, I shared posts from Rob King, the individual arrested, highlighting his threats against Kristi Noem and ICE. Some are even suggesting he should be sent to GITMO for his actions.

@nicksortor - Nick Sortor

🚨 #BREAKING: Homeland Security just ARRESTED the man who went viral calling to “open fire on ICE agents” This guy just learned the definition of F*** Around and Find Out 🤣🔥 Time to ALSO arrest the clown who posted a viral T*kTok calling for ICE agents to be “SHOT ON SIGHT” Noem is keeping her word to hold these clowns accountable. Keep fighting for our ICE heroes!

Video Transcript AI Summary
If ICE agents attempt to detain you or a loved one while wearing masks and driving unmarked vehicles without badges, you have the right to shoot them on-site in self-defense. Their behavior resembles that of gang members or the mafia, making it difficult to identify them. It is questioned why anyone would want to be an ICE agent, especially given their role in separating children from parents and deporting students. Deporting criminals is understandable, but targeting innocent people is considered ridiculous.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Shoot at ICE agents on-site. That's right. If ICE agents are trying to take you or a loved one, shoot them on-site. The way they're pulling up with masks on, with unmarked vehicles, no badge, no nothing. It could be anybody. It could be gang members. You have every right to shoot at them. This would be the best self defense case. You're just in fear for your life. You don't know who's behind that unmarked vehicle or who's behind that mask. This is ridiculous. What is our country coming to? Why would you wanna be a ICE agent anyway? Do you like separating kids from their parents? Do you like deporting students that are studying? I can understand deporting a gang member or criminals, but innocent people, it's ridiculous. The way these ICE agents are pulling up with masks on, unmarked vehicles, they are pulling up like gang members. They are pulling up like the mafia. You might as well shoot them on-site and have your day in court. Take care, guys. Now I'm out.

@nicksortor - Nick Sortor

These are the posts by Rob King, the man arrested by Homeland Security today for threatening Kristi Noem and ICE agents Sent him to GITMO! h/t @Brooketaylortv https://t.co/N5DFp2bUUu

Saved - April 28, 2025 at 8:56 PM

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

The Dems desperately need to import voters to win elections

@IanJaeger29 - Ian Jaeger

REPORT: Wisconsin Governor Tony Evers administration instructs all state employees to help illegal immigrants avoid ICE. https://t.co/N6eb7Q98O8

Saved - April 26, 2025 at 9:43 PM

@Timcast - Tim Pool

Arrest him

@IanJaeger29 - Ian Jaeger

REPORT: Wisconsin Governor Tony Evers administration instructs all state employees to help illegal immigrants avoid ICE. https://t.co/N6eb7Q98O8

Saved - April 27, 2025 at 1:14 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I came across a shocking report by election crime researcher Steve Baldwin, who claims that Democrats are using NGOs posing as charities to facilitate illegal immigration and manipulate voter registration. He asserts that swing state voter rolls are filled with illegal aliens, deceased individuals, and people who no longer reside in those states. Baldwin connects these findings to the 2020 election, suggesting that the combination of illegal aliens and mail-in ballots contributed to Joe Biden's 81 million votes.

@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

🚨🚨And here is the, BOMBSHELL REPORT that will shock the conscious of every American. Election crime researcher Steve Baldwin, CONFIRMS BEYOND THE SHADOW OF A DOUBT. Democrats are using NGOs disguised as charities to process illegal aliens—even before they cross the border. They’re then using the address of the processing center as the voter registration address. "What we have found is that voter rolls in the swing states are chock full of illegal aliens including dead voters, people who moved out of state, and people who don’t even exist living in gas stations.” Illegal Aliens + Mail-in-Ballots = 2020 Election. That’s how Joe Biden received his 81,000,000 crimes.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Some voter rolls in swing states contain illegal aliens because they register their address as the processing center. Software integrating property tax records with voting files reveals voters not living at legal residences. These new illegal voters are inundating voting roles, especially in swing states. In 2022, 40,000 phantom voters were exposed in Wisconsin and removed. These are people who were dead, moved out of state, don't exist, or don't live at a legal address. Challenging the address is the most efficient way to get an illegal voter off the voting roll. Certain NGO groups, such as Catholic Charities, are helping illegal immigrants and are funded by the Republican Party. These groups don't believe in borders and feel fine registering people to vote. Dark money, evading campaign rules, tends to go to NGOs and other groups. Evidence suggests a lot of dark money is coming from Chinese-controlled groups and is trying to affect the election in favor of Kamala Harris. The Trump campaign and the RNC need to dedicate time, money, and energy to analyzing the voting file in the seven major swing states to find voters using illegal addresses and have those addresses removed.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In research and voter fraud on and off for decades, and I'm in touch with a whole network of attorneys who work on voter fraud issues. And what we have found is that some of the voter rolls in the swing states are chock full of illegal aliens and other people who should not be on the voter roll. But we know there are illegal aliens on the voting rolls because they register their address as the processing center. All these NGOs that are processing them even before they cross the border, they're using the address of the processing center as their voter registration address. I guess they think Republicans are too stupid to notice. But we have software where we integrate the property tax records with the voting file. And so we can see where every voter actually lives. They have they have to live at a legal residence and many do not by the thousands. And all these new illegal voters are inundating the voting roles in especially the swing states. They are preparing for another big steal. Speaker 1: And in 2022, Senator Ron Johnson and Jay Valentine, they they exposed about 40,000 phantom voters. And let's talk about those phantom voters. They were in Wisconsin. They got them removed. And I understand that you tried reaching out to the Trump campaign, and they had no idea this was even happening. Speaker 0: Yeah. There's different ways of challenging people, but the most efficient way to get a bad voter, an illegal voter off the voting roll is to challenge the address. If the address is not a legal residence, they're easy to to you can you can force the mail to not go to it. You can't actually remove the person itself, but you can remove their address so that mail in ballots are no longer being sent to them. And that's the quickest way to do it, especially when we only have a few months left before the timeline hits. And yes, we removed about 40,000 what we call phantom voters. These are people who were dead or moved out of state or don't even exist or they don't live at a legal address. Address is listed as a gas station or a Walmart or a vacant house. And we're able to determine that. And because those 40,000 phantom voters were removed, Senator Ron Johnson was reelected. Speaker 1: So you also discovered certain NGO groups such as Catholic Charities. Yeah, they are helping out these illegal immigrants. Are actually funded by the Republican Party. Speaker 0: Yes. These are groups that are to the left of of most most mainstream religions or liberal Christian charity groups, and they have formed various NGOs. The Lutherans have one Catholic charities, another one, and they they don't believe in borders. And they they they feel perfectly fine with registering people to vote in our elections. They're very left. And and yet we funded them. The Republican budget last time around actually gave these NGOs the money to do to keep doing what they've been doing for a couple years. So yes, we have evidence that NGOs are deeply involved in corrupting our elections. Speaker 1: Yeah. Speaking of corruption, what is dark money and how is it influencing the key swing states? Speaker 0: Well, dark money is different ways of evading campaign rules on how much money you can give a candidate, And it tends to go to, not direct to the candidate, but to, NGOs and other groups. And, and then the money it's set up it's done in such a way that you can't tell the identity of the giver. But we have evidence that a lot of dark money is coming from Chinese controlled groups. And we believe this dark money is trying to affect the election in favor of Kamala Harris. Speaker 1: And the message that you really wanna get out there to the Trump the Trump campaign, the RNC, and and voters in America. Let's go ahead and, how can how can they ensure this November's election? How can they secure it? Speaker 0: Well, they need to have an emergency meeting right now and dedicate time, money, and energy to at least analyzing the voting file in the seven major swing states and find those voters who are are using illegal addresses and go through the process to have that address removed. They can do that in time for this election, but they have to start now.

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

The Dems desperately need to import voters to win elections

@IanJaeger29 - Ian Jaeger

REPORT: Wisconsin Governor Tony Evers administration instructs all state employees to help illegal immigrants avoid ICE.

Saved - April 28, 2025 at 3:20 AM

@WendyRogersAZ - Wendy Rogers

Can governors be arrested? My constituents have been asking me this constantly. Daily even.

@DerrickEvans4WV - Derrick Evans

🚨BREAKING: The Democrat Governor of Wisconsin, Tony Evers, just instructed state employees to obstruct federal ICE agents. https://t.co/iBK3TAqY9w

Saved - May 1, 2025 at 12:02 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
It takes days or weeks to get a warrant for a criminal search, so requiring one for Border Patrol to stop illegal aliens undermines our national sovereignty. Historically, no country has needed a judicial warrant to address foreign trespassers. Congress has excluded such procedures for alien removals, and this is madness.

@StephenM - Stephen Miller

It takes days or weeks to obtain a single warrant for a single criminal search. Requiring a warrant for Border Patrol to conduct an interdiction of an illegal alien is an act of legal insurrection against national sovereignty. Never in the history of our country or any country has a criminal judicial warrant been required to stop a foreign trespasser from invading your territory. Congress, indeed, has explicitly EXCLUDED all such procedures for alien removals. This is madness.

@EricLDaugh - Eric Daugherty

🚨 JUST IN: U.S. Federal District Judge Jennifer Thurston sends out an order banning Border Patrol from arresting illegal aliens "without warrant" - Fox Holy shlit. https://t.co/Fwy9NxrO4K

Video Transcript AI Summary
Following operation "Return to Sender" in January, where Border Patrol agents arrested individuals suspected of illegal entry, California District Judge Jennifer Thurston ruled that CBP agents cannot arrest suspected illegal migrants without a warrant. The judge also stipulated that there must be a reason to believe the person is a flight risk before a warrant can be obtained.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Alright. Another judicial pushback against president Trump's immigration crackdown. This comes after dozens were arrested in January during border patrol's operation return to sender, where agents rounded up people determined to have entered the, who were determined to determined to have entered the, country illegally. Yesterday, California district judge Jennifer Thurston demanded CBP agents cannot arrest suspected illegal migrants without a warrant or reason to believe the person is a flight risk before they can get one.
Saved - May 11, 2025 at 2:09 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared my thoughts on the recent arrest of Newark Mayor Ras Baraka for trespassing at an ICE facility, where he and others allegedly broke in. It seems like a desperate move that could end his political career. I also noted the actions of Rep. LaMonica McIver and Rep. Menendez, who reportedly pushed past security to enter the facility. Their behavior raises questions about their motives, especially since they’ve seen the conditions inside. Baraka claims he did nothing wrong, but the evidence suggests otherwise.

@wakeupnj - Wake Up NJ 🇺🇸 New Jersey

Democrat Ras Baraka, Mayor of Newark New Jersey was arrested for trespassing after he and others broke into an ICE Facility Guy is trying to look like a martyr, but just ended his political career "No one is above the law" https://t.co/sPjkxmNC28

@AlinaHabba - Alina Habba

The Mayor of Newark, Ras Baraka, committed trespass and ignored multiple warnings from Homeland Security Investigations to remove himself from the ICE detention center in Newark, New Jersey this afternoon. He has willingly chosen to disregard the law. That will not stand in this state. He has been taken into custody. NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW.

@wakeupnj - Wake Up NJ 🇺🇸 New Jersey

Info from @Bubblebathgirl "@RepLaMonica McIver just illegally entered an ICE facility in New Jersey by running in like a criminal when the gates were opened for an ICE bus" "...@RepMenendez pushed ICE agents to physically force his way past the gates" 🧵 https://t.co/xjFT8Ilt7P https://t.co/l8VQSH1W5A

@Bubblebathgirl - Paul A. Szypula 🇺🇸

You can see LaMonica McIver acting like a thug here outside of the Delaney ICE detention center in NJ. She assaulted ICE officers. Sadly, this is the low IQ behavior we’ve come to expect from Democrat members of Congress. @SpeakerJohnson, Expel McIver! https://t.co/ooaXpom3Ib

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker states, "You better put your hands on me." The speaker then says, "But Will. Okay? My So, this. It's for Brad, you know that's fool." They add, "They say it. Come in like that. Oh, boy."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You better put your hands on me. But Will. Okay? My So, this. It's for Brad, you know that's fool. They say it. Come in like that. Oh, boy.

@wakeupnj - Wake Up NJ 🇺🇸 New Jersey

@Bubblebathgirl @RepLaMonica @RepMenendez From @RepWPH 🚨DEMS GONE ROGUE: 2 Dem lawmakers & a pack of “protestors” reportedly BROKE INTO an ICE detention center in NJ This isn’t a protest-it’s a federal crime. The party of lawlessness, open borders, & illegal immigration keeps doubling down🧵 https://t.co/SPVThY3j2h https://t.co/si3VtBc9wh

Video Transcript AI Summary
Protests are ongoing at the privately operated ICE detention center in Newark, New Jersey. Democratic Congressman Robert Menendez Jr., son of the disgraced former senator, and Congresswoman Bonnie Watson Coleman were taken into custody after allegedly storming the facility. According to a DHS spokesman, the protesters were outside the facility when the gate opened for a van. Some protesters and the two members of Congress then allegedly stormed through the gate. DHS stated that the members of Congress storming into the detention facility is a bizarre political stunt that puts the safety of law enforcement agents and detainees at risk. DHS also stated that members of Congress are not above the law and cannot illegally break into detention facilities, and that they would have facilitated a tour had they been asked.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Correspondent, Eric Shawn, has more on what is unfolding in Newark. Eric, what have you learned? Yeah. Martha, that protests ongoing, that ICE Center, as we have been seeing in Newark, New Jersey involving those two members of congress and the city's mayor taken, into custody. The protest at Laney Hall, it's a huge privately operated detention center. You know, for weeks, it's been the target of demonstrations there. Reports, from a DHS spokesman tells Fox News that the protesters were outside the facility, that, when that gate opened you you can kinda see it there. The gate opened. A van went in. Then they say some of the protesters and two members of the of congress stormed in right through the gate. Those representatives, as we have reported, Democratic congressman Robert Mendendez junior, son of the former senator who was disgraced and convicted in a corruption case and resigned, and congresswoman Bonnie Watson Coleman, both Democrats, in a statement, DHS is saying this, quote, these members of congress storming into a detention facility goes beyond bizarre political stunt and puts the safety of our law enforcement agents and the detainees at risk. Members of congress are not above the law and cannot illegally break into detention facilities. Had these members requested a tour, we would have facilitated a tour of their facility. It is an ongoing situation. Martha, as you

@RepWPH - Rep. Wesley Hunt Press Office

🚨DEMS GONE ROGUE: Two Democrat lawmakers and a pack of “protestors” reportedly BROKE INTO an ICE detention center in New Jersey. This isn’t a protest—it’s a federal crime. The party of lawlessness, open borders, and illegal immigration keeps doubling down! https://t.co/iT8R2tkdcE

Video Transcript AI Summary
Protests are ongoing at the privately operated ICE detention center, Laney Hall, in Newark, New Jersey. According to a DHS spokesman, protesters and two members of congress stormed the facility after a gate opened to allow a van to enter. The members of congress involved are Democratic Congressman Robert Menendez Jr., son of the former senator, and Congresswoman Bonnie Watson Coleman, both Democrats. DHS released a statement saying the actions of the members of congress went beyond a political stunt and endangered law enforcement agents and detainees. DHS stated that members of congress are not above the law and cannot illegally break into detention facilities, and that a tour would have been facilitated if requested.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Correspondent, Eric Shawn, has more on what is unfolding in Newark. Eric, what have you learned? Yeah. Martha, that protests ongoing, that ICE Center, as we have been seeing in Newark, New Jersey involving those two members of congress and the city's mayor taken into custody. The protest at Laney Hall, it's a huge privately operated detention center. You know, for weeks, it's been the target of demonstrations there. Reports, from a DHS spokesman tells Fox News that the protesters were outside the facility, that, when that gate opened you you can kinda see it there. The gate opened. A van went in. Then they say some of the protesters and two members of the of congress stormed in right through the gate. Those representatives, as we have reported, Democratic congressman Robert Mendendez junior, son of the former senator who was disgraced and convicted in a corruption case and resigned, and congresswoman Bonnie Watson Coleman, both democrats. In a statement, DHS is saying this, quote, these members of congress storming into a detention facility goes beyond bizarre political stunt and puts the safety of our law enforcement agents and the detainees at risk. Members of congress are not above the law and cannot illegally break into detention facilities. Had these members requested a tour, we would have facilitated a tour of their facility. It is an ongoing situation. Martha, as you

@wakeupnj - Wake Up NJ 🇺🇸 New Jersey

@AlinaHabba confirmed the Mayor of Newark NJ Ras Baraka has been Arrested Will be charged for Breaking into an ICE Facility 🧵 https://t.co/THzMRf69qO https://t.co/6G5h82WM23

Video Transcript AI Summary
Mayor Raz Baraka has been arrested in New Jersey. According to the speaker, this is because Baraka publicly stated for three days that he would break in somewhere, eventually did break in, and refused multiple opportunities to remove himself. The speaker states that, like Pam Bondi in the United States, the state of New Jersey will not stand for anyone obstructing the removal of criminals. Baraka has been detained and will be charged. While confirming Baraka is in custody in New Jersey, the speaker declined to disclose the specific location where he is being held.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We have put the mayor, Raz Baraka, under arrest. You know, it's very simple, Martha. As I've said in the state of New Jersey, as Pam Bondi has said in The United States, we will not stand for anybody getting in the way of getting rid of criminals in this country. It's very simple. Unfortunately, the mayor has publicly for three days been saying that he's going to break in, eventually did break in, was given multiple opportunities to remove himself, failed to do so, and has been detained, and will be charged. And where is he being held? I'm not gonna speak to that right now. He's obviously in New Jersey. But he's in custody? Yes. He he is he has been arrested and and will be

@wakeupnj - Wake Up NJ 🇺🇸 New Jersey

Democrat Ras Baraka, Mayor of Newark New Jersey was arrested for trespassing after he and others broke into an ICE Facility Guy is trying to look like a martyr, but just ended his political career "No one is above the law" https://t.co/sPjkxmNC28

@AlinaHabba - Alina Habba

The Mayor of Newark, Ras Baraka, committed trespass and ignored multiple warnings from Homeland Security Investigations to remove himself from the ICE detention center in Newark, New Jersey this afternoon. He has willingly chosen to disregard the law. That will not stand in this

@wakeupnj - Wake Up NJ 🇺🇸 New Jersey

@AlinaHabba Should be really interesting to see what happens to Ras Baraka and these Dems after this Arrest 🧵 https://t.co/HdC5WtE38c

@wakeupnj - Wake Up NJ 🇺🇸 New Jersey

Ras Baraka is trying to play victim here being arrested outside an ICE facility in Newark These progressives look awful doing this and will be interesting to see if he drops out of the Gov race and what the other Dems running for Governor will say What do you think about this?

Video Transcript AI Summary
Ross Baraka, the mayor of Newark, New Jersey, is running for governor as a Democrat. He has been outside an ICE facility for the past three days. The speaker believes Baraka and the Democrats want to play victim and be martyrs. The speaker claims Democrats pushed for sanctuary status all over New Jersey and are skewing so far left that they're alienating independents and their moderate base. The speaker speculates about the future of Ross Baraka and whether he will drop out of the race and what will happen with his status as mayor.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If y'all don't know who this is, this is Ross Baraka, mayor of Newark, New Jersey, currently running on the Democrat side for governor. What's interesting is this man has been outside an ICE facility for the past three days. All for this shot right here. Ross Baraka and the Democrats want to play victim. They wanna be martyrs. The problem is is that you push for sanctuary status all over the state of New Jersey, all you Democrats. You look awful doing this. You're skewing so far left that you're alienating the independents and your moderate base. We'll see what happens with Ross Barack in the future. But I'd love to hear your comments, questions, concerns. Post them below because, seriously, I would love to know what you guys are thinking about this because this is wild, and I think he's gonna drop out of the race for this. And I'm curious what his mayor mayor status will be after all if he's not mayor of Newark anymore. I don't know. We'll see what happens, but definitely let me know what you think below.

@wakeupnj - Wake Up NJ 🇺🇸 New Jersey

Democrat Ras Baraka, Mayor of Newark New Jersey was arrested for trespassing after he and others broke into an ICE Facility Guy is trying to look like a martyr, but just ended his political career "No one is above the law" https://t.co/i5b7abWgmi

@wakeupnj - Wake Up NJ 🇺🇸 New Jersey

@AlinaHabba @DHSgov shows exactly who the Dems are fighting for as they try to break into the Newark ICE Facility 🧵 https://t.co/Kde8X8l7Su https://t.co/rZjbBkLgJ2

@wakeupnj - Wake Up NJ 🇺🇸 New Jersey

@DHSgov shows exactly who is at this facility Democrats are so desperate to shut down as they tried to break into the Newark ICE Facility What's ironic is these illegals wouldn't be here in the first place if there wasn't such a push for sanctuary state/cities here in NJ https://t.co/tVETSMCnsa

@wakeupnj - Wake Up NJ 🇺🇸 New Jersey

Democrat Ras Baraka, Mayor of Newark New Jersey was arrested for trespassing after he and others broke into an ICE Facility Guy is trying to look like a martyr, but just ended his political career "No one is above the law" https://t.co/i5b7abWgmi

@wakeupnj - Wake Up NJ 🇺🇸 New Jersey

Why is NJ Rep LaMonica McIver shoving and pushing her way past the gate to get into the Newark ICE facility? 🧵 https://t.co/gAbmQV9McK

@wakeupnj - Wake Up NJ 🇺🇸 New Jersey

Isn't this you pushing and shoving your way to get into the gate @RepLaMonica? https://t.co/jJZ7XIByro

Video Transcript AI Summary
Someone calls an unidentified group "New Jersey's Gestapo" and says, "You're tough. Real fucking tough." They then ask, "You're safe now, guys? Oh, you're safe now."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: New Jersey's Gestapo. Right here. Oh, yeah. Nice Oh, yeah. You're tough. Real fucking tough. Alright. Go ahead. K. You're safe now, guys? Oh, you're safe now.

@wakeupnj - Wake Up NJ 🇺🇸 New Jersey

Democrat Ras Baraka, Mayor of Newark New Jersey was arrested for trespassing after he and others broke into an ICE Facility Guy is trying to look like a martyr, but just ended his political career "No one is above the law" https://t.co/i5b7abWgmi

@wakeupnj - Wake Up NJ 🇺🇸 New Jersey

Ras Baraka released after being arrested saying he didn't do anything wrong Yeah, you did 🧵 https://t.co/vhvciyxuIT

@wakeupnj - Wake Up NJ 🇺🇸 New Jersey

Ras Baraka saying "....I didn't do anything wrong..." As he is released from being arrested at the Newark ICE Facility You literally trespassed, pushed and shoved your way to get past the gate 🔽 https://t.co/T3JPhCIPVn https://t.co/IgLM4gsR14

Video Transcript AI Summary
Someone calls out "New Jersey's Gestapo" to a group of people. The speaker sarcastically says "Oh, yeah. Nice Oh, yeah. You're tough. Real fucking tough." The speaker then says "Alright. Go ahead. K. You're safe now, guys? Oh, you're safe now."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: New Jersey's Gestapo. Right here. Oh, yeah. Nice Oh, yeah. You're tough. Real fucking tough. Alright. Go ahead. K. You're safe now, guys? Oh, you're safe now.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims they are portrayed as a villain on social media but cannot discuss the case due to legal restrictions. They assert their innocence, stating they did nothing wrong. The speaker references people seeking jobs, enrolling children in schools, and standing in food lines. They highlight the struggle to find opportunity in the community, emphasizing the risks taken by those who set foot in this city.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But these people have. That's right. And I and I see you on social media. They try to make me out to be a villain. I can't speak about the case, so I won't go into that. Speak brother. I promised the lawyers and the judge that I'd keep my mouth shut when I came out here. But the but the but the reality is this, I didn't do anything wrong. And all of us here, Everybody Yes. That tries to find a job here Yes. That tries to get their kids in the school Yes. That stands in food lines and ground lines Yes. Trying to get food here in this city you. That set their foot on this soil and risk what we all risk every day. Yeah. Talk about it. Down this community, trying to find opportunity for ourselves when opportunity doesn't exist.

@wakeupnj - Wake Up NJ 🇺🇸 New Jersey

Democrat Ras Baraka, Mayor of Newark New Jersey was arrested for trespassing after he and others broke into an ICE Facility Guy is trying to look like a martyr, but just ended his political career "No one is above the law" https://t.co/i5b7abWgmi

@wakeupnj - Wake Up NJ 🇺🇸 New Jersey

These folks have seen the conditions inside the Newark ICE facility, so then why did they push and shove their way past the gate? 🧵 https://t.co/QfLXQ5yW1T

@wakeupnj - Wake Up NJ 🇺🇸 New Jersey

Ras Baraka and several Congress representatives pushing and shoving, effectively trespassing All because they want access to the facility, but Bonnie Watson Coleman just admitted they seen the conditions So why did they force there way past the gates?? https://t.co/ZHtbnnvTwI https://t.co/5pSrNQSXlp

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker visited an unspecified facility and found the conditions inside to be acceptable, noting people are safe, clean, and being fed. However, the speaker doesn't know if everyone inside belongs there. The speaker believes ICE is out of control and attempting to intimidate people, but asserts that they will not succeed. The speaker declares that "we, the people" will ensure the current administration adheres to the rules that separate the U.S. from dictatorships. The speaker then yields the floor to Lamonica.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The fear of individuals just going about their lives in the streets. We came here to see the conditions inside and those conditions aren't bad. We don't know that everyone who is inside belongs there, but we knew that people are Okay. They're safe. It's clean. They're feeding them. ICE is out of control. ICE thinks it can intimidate all of us, and it cannot intimidate any of us. And we, the people, will make sure that this administration adheres to the rules that separate us from dictatorships in other third world countries. And I've spoken much too long. Let me turn this over to Lamonica. I guess because I'm the oldest and I'm the angriest.

@wakeupnj - Wake Up NJ 🇺🇸 New Jersey

Democrat Ras Baraka, Mayor of Newark New Jersey was arrested for trespassing after he and others broke into an ICE Facility Guy is trying to look like a martyr, but just ended his political career "No one is above the law" https://t.co/i5b7abWgmi

@wakeupnj - Wake Up NJ 🇺🇸 New Jersey

"..The video clearly shows @RepLaMonica (red clothing) shoving/elbowing her way past a DHS agent to get past the gate and into the property, followed behind by @RepMenendez & that it also shows Congresswoman McIver screaming in the faces of DHS agents" 🧵 https://t.co/v2duaJU0DI

@BillMelugin_ - Bill Melugin

NEW: DHS has provided @FoxNews ICE bodycam video from the altercation at the Delaney Hall detention facility yesterday. They say the video clearly shows @RepLaMonica (red clothing) shoving/elbowing her way past a DHS agent to get past the gate and into the property, followed behind by @RepMenendez & that it also shows Congresswoman McIver screaming in the faces of DHS agents. The members of Congress claim they were assaulted and “roughed up” during the incident, and deny DHS’ characterization that they “stormed” the facility.

Saved - May 25, 2025 at 3:19 PM

@CNviolations - Community Notes & Violations

Ed Krassenstein advises illegal immigrants to deny ICE access and chain their doors unless presented with a warrant. https://t.co/44ZgC7YIwe

Video Transcript AI Summary
If ICE agents come to your door, ask for a judicial warrant through the door, either by cracking the door on a chain lock or speaking through the closed door. A judicial warrant will have "Federal District Court" or "U.S. Court" on the heading and be signed by a magistrate or judge. Do not let them in without this warrant.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Please listen and share with your friends and family to protect them from ICE. If ICE agents come to your door, ask them for a judicial warrant through the door. Either chain lock your door and crack it or don't open it and speak to them through the door. A judicial warrant will say Federal District Court or U. S. Court on the heading. It will not say DHS. It will also be signed by a magistrate or a judge, so make sure that signature is there. If you don't receive one of these, do not let them in.

@badboujeebabee - BoujeeBombshell

@CNviolations Is this obstruction? https://t.co/8Bx0rFwVmt

Saved - January 9, 2026 at 1:17 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A post circulated details of surveillance footage: Renee Good’s SUV stopped sideways on a street for about three minutes before an incident. Agents gathered nearby, the SUV moved, and a passenger exited. The vehicle then blocked the road perpendicularly. An ICE officer arrived, resumed pursuit as others grabbed the door, and three gunshots were fired. A responder replied with a link.

@ImMeme0 - I Meme Therefore I Am 🇺🇸

NEW: Footage shows Renee Good’s vehicle stopped sideways in a Minneapolis street for three minutes before accident occur. “Surveillance video taken by a nearby home shows agents milling about near the vehicle, then converging on it. You can see, right there, the SUV begins to move—and that’s when the shots are fired.” “The SUV had been stationary and sideways across the road like that for about three minutes. The reason for that is unclear.” “The footage shows Renee Good’s maroon Honda Pilot entering from the right. Then, about 20 seconds later, someone gets out on the passenger side. We don’t know who this person is or why they leave the car. We then see her turn and pull perpendicular across the street, seeming to block the way.” “Finally, there is a new angle showing the federal officer who shot her. He arrives as another federal SUV pulls up. The ICE officer briefly goes back to his car, then returns, and with another agent grabbing at her door, she starts to move forward again—followed by three gunshots in quick succession.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
The surveillance footage shows a dark colored SUV driven by Renee Nicole Goode on the right in the back as it passes by. Agents are seen milling about near the vehicle, then converging on it, and the SUV begins to move, at which point shots are fired. Prior to this, the video shows the SUV stationary and sideways across the road for about three minutes, though the reason for that is unclear. CNN has obtained new video, grainy and distant, that shows four full minutes leading up to the shooting. Renee Goods’ maroon Honda Pilot enters from the right, and twenty seconds later someone gets out on the passenger side; we do not know who or why this person leaves the car. We then see her turn and pull perpendicular across the street, seeming to block the way but leaving room for vehicles to pass by her on either side. There is also a new angle of the federal officer who shot her. He arrives as another federal SUV pulls up; the ICE officer briefly goes back to his car, then returns, and with another agent grabbing at her door she starts to move forward again. It is hard to see from this angle, followed by three gunshots in quick succession. The footage shows four minutes in all from start to finish, but for all the video that may reveal, it says nothing about why Renee Goode was where she was or what she was doing there. It’s not all we don’t know.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: As the vehicle passes, you can see the dark colored SUV driven by Renee Nicole Goode. That's on the right there in the back. The surveillance video taken by a home nearby. Agents can be seen milling about near the vehicle, then converging on it. And then you see right there, the SUV begins to move, and that's when the shots are fired. Now prior to this, the video shows the SUV had been stationary and sideways across the road like that for about three minutes. The reason for that is unclear. Speaker 1: CNN has obtained some new video. Again, it's grainy and distant, but it shows four full minutes leading up to the shooting. It shows Renee Goods maroon Honda pilot entering, from the right there. Then twenty seconds later, someone gets out on the passenger side we don't know who or why this person leaves the car. We then see her turn and pull perpendicular across the street seeming to to block the way but as you see here leaving room for vehicles to pass by her on either side. Finally there is this new angle of the federal officer who shot her he arrives another federal SUV pulls up as the ICE officer briefly goes back to his car then he returns and with another agent grabbing at her door she starts to move forward again it's hard to see from this angle followed by three gunshots in quick succession. Four minutes in all from start to finish but for all the video that may reveal it says nothing about why Renee Goode was where she was or what she was doing there and it's not all we don't know.

@KimWexlerMAJD - Kimberly “Kim” Wexler MA JD

@ImMeme0 https://t.co/Ddz13hmBbW

@KimWexlerMAJD - Kimberly “Kim” Wexler MA JD

⚖️A new form of UNRESTRICTED LAWFARE? Are politically-guided civil rights lawyers weaponizing their individual First Amendment rights to spew harmful misinformation? Does this misinformation tend to encourage unlawful, dangerous confrontations? Under the shield of commentary Jenin Younes, national legal director for the American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Council, incorrectly and absurdly advised X readers that ICE officers had “no law enforcement authority over” Renee Good, and “no authority to search a U.S. citizen or arrest her.” Younes, a former appellate advocate for indigent criminal defendants, prefaces her commentary with her credentials, framing herself as a neutral expert: “I’m a former defense attorney and currently a civil liberties attorney with no political dog in this fight.” Admitting she has “the right to change” her opinion “if additional information changes the calculus,” Younes says she has reviewed early video of the tragic confrontation between Renee Good and ICE and confidently asserts: “It is very clear that the officers instigated the confrontation.” As a trained attorney myself, I am astounded at Younes’ willingness to risk her reputation on such a strange hill without first investigating the facts of what occurred BEFORE the scene that emerges from the 9-second video clips. But what’s more astonishing (and frankly shocking) are Younes’ statements of law that are dangerously, absurdly incorrect. In the first wave of commentary about the encounter, many inferred Good was free to leave the scene — despite audio in some clips with the voice of an agent shouting to Good, “get out of the f—— vehicle!” There is no “right to flee” a law enforcement encounter simply because one believes it may be unlawful. And there is no reason to believe the encounter was unlawful. Because contrary to Younes’ assertions, ICE agents in the course of executing their enforcement duties have statutory authority to stop, question, detain and arrest U.S. citizens, codified at 8 U.S. Code § 1357(a)(5). For activists who seek to exercise their First Amendment rights, civil rights attorneys like Younes should advise on the limits of their rights to protest lawfully and on how to protest safely. And they should make it clear that actively interfering with ICE activities is absolutely outside the bounds of Constitutionally protected expression. Under Younes’ view, the assertion that ICE officers have “no law enforcement authority over” U.S. citizens tends to suggest that citizens can interfere with their operations or commit crimes against them with impunity. Clearly that is not the case. Statements from Good’s family members and eyewitnesses suggest that Good had coordinated with local activists and was consciously leading or participating in an operation to obstruct ICE by blocking the road with their vehicles. Obviously, investigation is ongoing, and more facts will come to light. I agree with Younes on one thing: Renee Good should not have died. If Renee had had a proper understanding of the law, and of the dangerousness of putting herself physically between ICE and the execution of their law enforcement duties, the 37-year-old mom might have thought twice before taking part. Was it foreseeable? Could a mistaken belief that the law does not apply to her, in someone who adheres to zealous anti-ICE ideology, be the catalyst to radicalize a mom to commit an act of obstruction, sabotage or terrorism? Being in a vehicle may have enhanced the dangerousness compared to anti-ICE activism we saw in 2025, where protestors blocked roads with their bodies. Driving a 2-ton vehicle means Renee was operating a potentially lethal weapon, justifying lethal force in a self-defense situation. Does Younes have a “political dog in this fight”? Glenn Greenwald touts Younes’ work combatting censorship, leading a lawsuit against the Biden administration, as evidence of her lack of political bias. But to assume, on the basis of minimal evidence, that ICE agents must be held accountable for “overreach” is the very definition of prejudice: to hold a preconceived opinion. Lawyers have opinions. But a preconceived opinion against law enforcement in this context strongly suggests a political agenda. Does Younes’ misstatement of law suggest a new form of “unrestricted lawfare”? You decide.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 expresses concern about the administration’s response to the incident, noting that very quickly, very high up people, including Christine Ohm, Donald Trump himself, and Shady Vance, started calling the killed woman a domestic terrorist and saying she deserved it. The speaker argues that when a relatively young mother of three is killed by a law enforcement officer, government officials should say this was a tragedy, that they will conduct an investigation, and they will see what happened, instead of “running cover for the officer,” because such conduct erodes public trust. The speaker emphasizes that many things about the response freaked people out and describes it as disturbing to have people calling the woman a domestic terrorist. The question is raised: “What the fuck does that even mean?” The speaker notes that even if she did try to run the officer over, it’s not terrorism, and questions what people are talking about when they use that label. There is a critique of how words like “terrorist” are used loosely and how they have “lost meaning,” with the speaker asserting that this is the kind of rhetoric that is used to paint people in certain ways. The speaker draws a comparison, suggesting that labeling someone a terrorist resembles tactics used against Palestinians, where everyone is painted as a terrorist. The rapid labeling is described as part of a broader pattern of invoking terrorism to justify actions or narratives. The speaker concludes with a conditional reflection: if someone is a terrorist, then “actually anything goes,” signaling a perception that the label is being used to bypass normal standards or accountability.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And I think was troublesome about the administration's response was that very quickly, very high up people, including, you know, Christine Ohm, Donald Trump himself, Shady Vance, you know, started calling her a domestic terrorist saying that she deserved it. I think that's you know, when a relatively young mother of three gets killed by a law enforcement officer, I think that, you know, government officials high up government officials that should say this was a tragedy. We're gonna conduct an investigation. We're gonna see what happened instead of running cover for the officer. That just depletes public trust, I think. Like, it's so just so many, I think, things that really freaked people out. And I I think it is disturbing to have people calling her a domestic terrorist. What the fuck does that even mean? Like, even if she did try to run the officer over, it's not it's not terrorism. Like, what are you talking about? You're just throwing these words around. They've lost meaning and trying to paint her like, it's kind of what they do to Palestinians, you know, just calling everyone terrorist. Everybody's a terrorist. And Yeah. And if they are a terrorist right. If you're a terrorist, then actually anything goes. Right? And I think

@JeninYounesEsq - Jenin Younes

I'm a former defense attorney and currently a civil liberties attorney with no political dog in this fight. I watched the video at least 10 times from different angles and at different speeds and waited to offer an opinion, which I still reserve the right to change if additional

Saved - January 14, 2026 at 9:51 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I view this as fake for two reasons: 1) Obama counted border turnaways as deportations; interior deportations are needed because Biden/Harris let them in. 2) In non-sanctuary cities, deportations are orderly; sanctuary jurisdictions fight immigration enforcement to sow chaos, and they’re wrong. The reference cites Obama’s 3+ million deportations. Post 2 notes Moran was fired for leftist radicalism, pretending to be objective.

@JDVance - JD Vance

This argument is just entirely fake, for two reasons. 1) In the Obama administration, they counted being turned away at the border as a deportation. A person would show up, be sent back, and counted as a deportation. We have to do deportations from the interior of the country because Biden and Harris let them walk in. 2) In the cities that are not sanctuary cities, the deportation process is orderly and normal--like most law enforcement. In Minneapolis and a few other sanctuary jurisdictions, local jurisdictions and a few leftwing agitators have decided to wage war on all immigration enforcement officers. They are hoping that a little chaos will convince us to give up on immigration enforcement. They are wrong.

@TerryMoran - Terry Moran 🇺🇸

Barack Obama deported more than 3 million people from this country while he was president. No masked gangs descending on neighborhoods, snatching ordinary working people from their cars and disappearing them, storming homes without judicial warrants. This is just force, not law.

@noturtlesoup17 - amanda moore 🐢

Today at 34 & Park in Minneapolis, a woman tried to drive down the street where a protest had broken out in front of a home ICE was raiding, saying she had a doctor apt to get to. ICE agents busted out her windows, cut off her seatbelt, and pulled her out before arresting her.

@JDVance - JD Vance

Note: until he was fired for being a leftwing radical, Terry Moran was pretending to be an objective journalist on one of the major networks.

Saved - January 17, 2026 at 1:37 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I describe ICE agents going door to door in Columbia Heights, MN, targeting people by how they sound, demanding proof of citizenship, and trafficking them when they refuse. A man on private property is told to show ID, though no warrant, crime, or suspicion exists. An agent says, “Because of your accent.” They escalate, grab him, and restrain him without probable cause. Recording is obstructed. This arrangement abuses power.

@TheJFreakinC - Jesus Freakin Congress

🚨BREAKING: In Columbia Heights, MN, ICE agents are going door to door and targeting people based on how they sound, demanding proof of citizenship, then human trafficking them when they refuse to comply with unlawful orders. In the video, a man is standing by a garage on private property. ICE agents approach him and demand identification. The man correctly states that he does not have to show ID. He is not suspected of a crime, he is on private property, and the agents have no warrant… He then asks why he is required to provide documentation. An agent then says the quiet part out loud… “Because of your accent.” The man points out the obvious, “You have an accent too.” The agent then asks, “Where were you born?” The man responds, “Where were you born?” At that point, the agent escalates. He orders, “Put your hands behind your back,” then physically grabs the man, shoves him against the garage, and restrains him without a warrant, without probable cause, and without reasonable suspicion of a crime, or even knowing who he is. Another agent steps directly in front of the camera to obstruct recording, while another joins in assaulting the man on private property. What’s illegal here is visible on video: • Detaining someone on private property without a warrant • Demanding identification without reasonable suspicion • Targeting someone based solely on accent or perceived national origin • Using force to enforce an unlawful order • Obstructing a lawful recording of law enforcement The man is then taken against his will so ICE can “prove his status.” That is not a lawful stop, it is human trafficking under color of law, seizing a person first and transporting them elsewhere to investigate their identity later, all for profit. This is not border enforcement. This is not public safety. This is government agents abducting people based on how they sound, then trafficking them through detention systems for funding, quotas, and “processing.” And the question isn’t whether this man had legal status. The question is how long Americans will tolerate federal agents kidnapping people on private property, calling it “verification,” and pretending the Constitution no longer applies.

Video Transcript AI Summary
A confrontation unfolds between two parties, centered on whether the individual can be taken into custody and what paperwork is required. The officer or responder initiates the exchange by framing a choice: “You are required to. Where are you safe? Look, sir. Are you gonna do this the easy way, or are we gonna take you in?” The other person resists, insisting, “You cannot take me,” followed by, “Privately. Yes. I can.” The responder asserts authority: “Yes. I can.” The individual counters that they possess documentation, stating, “I do have my documentation.” The responder questions why paperwork is being requested, noting, “Because of your accent.” The person replies that they still are aware the other party has an accent too, adding, “I still you have an accent too.” The dialogue then shifts to a question about origin: “Where were you born, sir? Where were you born at?” The exchange escalates into a directive, as the responder orders, “Put your hands behind your back.” Key dynamics and exchanges: - The core dispute is whether the individual can be taken in and under what circumstances, with the other party emphasizing the possibility of a private resolution. - Documentation is presented by the individual as sufficient to satisfy any enforcement demands, while the responder attributes the request for paperwork to concerns over the individual’s accent. - The dialogue includes a mutual acknowledgment of accents, suggesting a potential bias or stereotype influencing the interaction. - The conversation culminates in a physical compliance instruction from one party—placing their hands behind their back—indicating a move toward detention or custody. Overall, the scene focuses on a power dynamic between enforcement personnel and the individual, anchored by demands for documentation, a debate over appropriate procedures influenced by perceived accent, and a final command signaling impending custodial action.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Yes. You are required to. Where are you safe? Look, sir. Are you gonna do this the easy way, or are we gonna take you in? You cannot take me Yes. I can. Privately. Yes. I can. You just have documentation. I do have my documentation. And you presented to me. Why are you asking me for my paperwork? Because of your accent. I still you have an accent too. Where were you born, sir? Where were you born at? Put your hands behind your back.
Saved - January 20, 2026 at 9:52 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m documenting a thread alleging that DHS and ICE/Border Patrol unlawfully detain, arrest, or harass people—often without warrants, probable cause, or proper identification procedures. Claims include racial profiling, detaining citizens, beating, home invasions, restroom detentions, bus stops, and trafficking-style practices. The videos depict abuses labeled as enforcement, with serious Fourth Amendment concerns raised.

@TheJFreakinC - Jesus Freakin Congress

🚨 DHS: “We don’t target people based on race or ethnicity.” Reality: An ongoing thread of videos proving they do. 👇 https://t.co/CbHaDw9ohQ

@TheJFreakinC - Jesus Freakin Congress

#1: https://t.co/wnSY6qwIRX

@TheJFreakinC - Jesus Freakin Congress

🚨BREAKING: In Columbia Heights, MN, ICE agents are going door to door and targeting people based on how they sound, demanding proof of citizenship, then human trafficking them when they refuse to comply with unlawful orders. In the video, a man is standing by a garage on private property. ICE agents approach him and demand identification. The man correctly states that he does not have to show ID. He is not suspected of a crime, he is on private property, and the agents have no warrant… He then asks why he is required to provide documentation. An agent then says the quiet part out loud… “Because of your accent.” The man points out the obvious, “You have an accent too.” The agent then asks, “Where were you born?” The man responds, “Where were you born?” At that point, the agent escalates. He orders, “Put your hands behind your back,” then physically grabs the man, shoves him against the garage, and restrains him without a warrant, without probable cause, and without reasonable suspicion of a crime, or even knowing who he is. Another agent steps directly in front of the camera to obstruct recording, while another joins in assaulting the man on private property. What’s illegal here is visible on video: • Detaining someone on private property without a warrant • Demanding identification without reasonable suspicion • Targeting someone based solely on accent or perceived national origin • Using force to enforce an unlawful order • Obstructing a lawful recording of law enforcement The man is then taken against his will so ICE can “prove his status.” That is not a lawful stop, it is human trafficking under color of law, seizing a person first and transporting them elsewhere to investigate their identity later, all for profit. This is not border enforcement. This is not public safety. This is government agents abducting people based on how they sound, then trafficking them through detention systems for funding, quotas, and “processing.” And the question isn’t whether this man had legal status. The question is how long Americans will tolerate federal agents kidnapping people on private property, calling it “verification,” and pretending the Constitution no longer applies.

Video Transcript AI Summary
An officer confronts a man and presents a choice: “Are you gonna do this the easy way, or are we gonna take you in?” The man asserts, “You cannot take me,” to which the officer responds, “Yes. I can,” and notes the possibility of handling it privately: “Privately. Yes. I can.” The officer says the man lacks paperwork, but the man replies, “I do have my documentation,” and asks, “And you presented to me. Why are you asking me for my paperwork?” The officer explains, “Because of your accent.” The man counters, “I still you have an accent too,” and the officer asks, “Where were you born, sir? Where were you born at?” The interaction ends with the officer ordering, “Put your hands behind your back.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Yes. You are required to. Where are you safe? Look, sir. Are you gonna do this the easy way, or are we gonna take you in? You cannot take me Yes. I can. Privately. Yes. I can. You just have documentation. I do have my documentation. And you presented to me. Why are you asking me for my paperwork? Because of your accent. I still you have an accent too. Where were you born, sir? Where were you born at? Put your hands behind your back.

@TheJFreakinC - Jesus Freakin Congress

#2: https://t.co/dKeCwLPLsD

@TheJFreakinC - Jesus Freakin Congress

🚨BREAKING: ICE/Border Patrol agents are human trafficking people in Minneapolis. In the video, you hear an agent say, “Do you have an ID?” And then seconds later say, “So you don’t have an ID?” and then immediately grab the woman and take her. He does not know who she is. He does not give her time to answer. He does not allow her to present identification. He simply seizes her and removes her so she can be placed in a detention facility while they “verify her status,” a process that financially benefits the agencies and contractors holding her. Taking someone by force, without verification, due process, or lawful justification, and transporting them for confinement and profit fits the definition of human trafficking. Calling it “enforcement” doesn’t change what it is.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 asks whether you need to show ID, questions if that has a warrant, and asks if you don’t have an ID.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Do you need to put the ID? I don't know if that's have a warrant. In it. So you don't have an ID?

@TheJFreakinC - Jesus Freakin Congress

#3: https://t.co/UiFgbW4L87

@TheJFreakinC - Jesus Freakin Congress

🚨BREAKING: ICE agents are now pulling people out of restrooms, refusing ID, and taking them without identifying who they are. In Clearwater, Minnesota, a video shows a group of agents waiting outside a men’s restroom inside a truck repair shop. Seconds later, you hear a man yelling, panic and fear in his voice. Then about five agents rush toward the restroom. An agent says, “Let’s go.” Agents pull a man out of the restroom, handcuffed. The man pleads, “I’ll give you my ID!” An agent responds, “Right, right, right…” as they push him out the door and take him away without verifying who he is or checking his ID. Everything about this video is alarming… Law enforcement is not allowed to detain people arbitrarily. ICE agents must have legal authority to seize someone, and restrooms, inside private businesses, are non-public spaces. Entering or removing someone from that space generally requires a judicial warrant or consent, absent an actual emergency. Ignoring an offer to provide identification while forcibly detaining someone raises serious due process and Fourth Amendment concerns. This isn’t about immigration status. This is about the government ignoring the constitution, racially profiling, and grabbing anyone who doesn’t immediately comply with their illegal demands. When federal agents can drag someone out of a restroom without verifying who the person is, and without accountability, no one’s rights are safe.

@TheJFreakinC - Jesus Freakin Congress

#4: https://t.co/eZO0J5aCyJ

@TheJFreakinC - Jesus Freakin Congress

🚨 Another day, another video of ICE agents illegally harassing a U.S. citizen for “proof of citizenship” while she walks through her own neighborhood in Minneapolis. In the video, a woman is surrounded by masked ICE agents. One agent tells her, “Do you have ID? If not, we’ll have to put you in our car and ID you.” That statement alone is unlawful. She calmly states, “I’m a U.S. citizen.” The agent immediately demands ID anyway. She correctly explains that she is not required to carry identification while walking in her neighborhood. There is no law requiring citizens to carry papers, and ICE does not have the authority to detain someone without reasonable, articulable suspicion of a specific crime. At that point, the agents escalate. They begin asking where she was born. She responds, “Minneapolis is my home.” The agents claim they are conducting an “immigration check” and repeat the question. That is not a legal basis for detention. Citizenship is not determined by place of birth alone, and ICE has no authority to conduct random street interrogations of people not suspected of immigration violations. When she again refuses to show ID, an agent threatens, “We’re going to put you in our car then.” That is an explicit threat of unlawful detention. She says, “I should be able to walk around at 3 without being afraid for my life.” Instead of disengaging, the agent again demands ID and again demands to know where she was born. She repeats, clearly and correctly, “It doesn’t matter where I was born. I’m a U.S. citizen.” The agent then attempts intimidation, warning her that lying about being a U.S. citizen could result in federal charges, despite having no evidence she was lying and no lawful basis to continue the stop. Only after repeated refusals to comply with an illegal detention do the agents finally walk away. This wasn’t law enforcement. It was a fishing expedition, relying on fear, intimidation, and the false belief that Americans must carry papers to exist in public. If masked federal agents can threaten to kidnap a U.S. citizen off the street for refusing to answer questions they have no legal right to ask, then the question isn’t whether rights are being violated. The question is how long Americans are expected to tolerate it.

Video Transcript AI Summary
An officer confronts a woman on the street, insisting she show identification. The officer asks for an ID multiple times, stating, “Do you have an ID on you, ma’am?” and later, “If not, we're gonna put you in the vehicle. We're gonna ID you.” The woman responds that she doesn’t need an ID to walk around in her city, and she refuses to produce any identification, saying, “I don't need to carry around an ID in my home,” and, “Not gonna give you a ID.” The officer presses, requesting the woman’s birth information as part of what he describes as an immigration check and a citizen check. He asks, “Where were you born?” and “Ma’am, can we see an ID, please?” The woman asserts her status, declaring, “I am US citizen,” and reiterates that Minneapolis is her home. She insists that this is where she belongs and that she should be allowed to walk there without fear, replying, “This is my home,” and, “I belong here. I should be walking around here at three. I shouldn't be afraid in my life at this point.” The officer continues to demand identification, stating, “Ma’am, do you have an ID to give us? Skirt? Yes. You're correct.” The woman pushes back on the line of questioning, asserting, “I am US citizen. I am US citizen. I don't think so. You have a right to picture me while I am in my home or walking around in my home. This is not acceptable.” She accuses the officers of terrorizing people, insisting, “You guys, you terrorizing people. Ma’am.” The exchange centers on the tension between civil verification checks and the woman’s insistence on her rights and belonging. As the conversation escalates, the officer reiterates the need for a birth place, while the woman remains adamant that where she was born is irrelevant to her citizenship and right to be in her home area. She maintains that she belongs there, repeatedly stating, “This I is my belong here. I'm sorry. I belong I'm not gonna take out anything. What the fuck?” The dialogue ends with the woman’s determination to resist producing any identification and a continued assertion of her US citizenship and claim to the space as her home.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Do you have an ID on you, ma'am? Speaker 1: I don't need a ID to walk around in in my city. This Speaker 0: is Okay. Do you have some IDs in, please? Speaker 1: I don't need a Speaker 0: If not, we're gonna put you in the vehicle. We're gonna ID you. Speaker 1: Can I do you? I'm not gonna take out you take out Speaker 0: your ID. You don't have an ID? Speaker 1: I'm not gonna take out an ID. Speaker 0: Hey, man. Speaker 1: It's ma'am. Am US citizen. I am US citizen. Speaker 0: Alright. Can we see an ID, please? Speaker 1: I am US citizen. I don't need to carry around an ID in my home. Well, where were born? Speaker 0: Where were you born? Speaker 1: This is my home. Speaker 0: Where were you born? Speaker 1: Minneapolis is my home. Speaker 0: Ma'am, that's not that's we're doing an immigration check. We're doing a citizen check. Speaker 1: This is where Speaker 0: We're asking you where you were born. Speaker 1: This is where I belong. This is my home. Speaker 0: Ma'am, can belong here, but where were Speaker 1: you born? Not gonna give you a ID. Speaker 0: Then we're gonna put you in the vehicle. Speaker 1: I belong here. I should be walking around here at three. I shouldn't be afraid in my life at this point. Speaker 0: Ma'am, do you have an ID to give us? Skirt? Yes. You're correct. Speaker 1: You're making me a skirt. You're making me a Do you Speaker 0: have an ID? Speaker 1: This is my home. Speaker 0: Ma'am, where were you born? Speaker 1: I am US citizen. I am US citizen. I don't think so. You have a right to picture me while I am in my home or walking around in my home. This is not acceptable. You guys, you terrorizing people. Ma'am And it's not Speaker 0: Where were you born? Speaker 1: It doesn't matter where I was born. Belong here. I am US citizen. What else can I say? I am citizen. This is my home. Speaker 0: Menia realize that if Speaker 1: you lie Speaker 0: that you're a US citizen Speaker 1: Menia, but this is my home. Speaker 0: Then you can get it up Speaker 1: Menia, but this I is my belong here. I'm sorry. I belong I'm not gonna take out anything. What the fuck?

@TheJFreakinC - Jesus Freakin Congress

#5: https://t.co/0XrfHZCTsK

@TheJFreakinC - Jesus Freakin Congress

🚨BREAKING: Border Patrol agents are caught on camera unlawfully stopping and threatening a U.S. citizen at a gas station, with zero legal basis. In the video, a Border Patrol agent approaches a man who is simply pumping gas into an unmarked vehicle and immediately demands, “Let me see your ID.” The man correctly responds, “I don’t have to show it to you.” Instead of stating any lawful reason for the stop, the agent escalates and asks, “How do I know you’re a U.S. citizen?” That question alone exposes the violation. The man is wearing normal clothing, committing no crime, not crossing a border, not driving, and not suspected of anything. There is no traffic stop, no reasonable suspicion, no probable cause, and no legal authority to demand proof of citizenship in this context. So, what the agent is really saying is this: If you don’t look white enough, you must prove you belong. That is racial profiling. It is unconstitutional. And it is illegal. The agent then issues a threat: “This can go two ways. I can take you in, or you show me your ID.” That is not a choice, it’s coercion. Faced with the threat of unlawful detention, the man is forced to hand over his identification, surrendering his rights under duress. This is exactly how constitutional rights are stripped away, not by law, but by intimidation. If Border Patrol can demand “proof of citizenship” from Americans at a gas station with no cause, then no one’s rights are safe.

@TheJFreakinC - Jesus Freakin Congress

#6: https://t.co/e2rWG50v7d

@TheJFreakinC - Jesus Freakin Congress

🚨 BREAKING: ICE agents in Minneapolis are seen arresting another teenager without verifying his identity first, and admit to it on camera. In the video, the teenager calmly tells agents he can go inside and get his ID to prove who he is. The agents refuse. Instead, they say they’ll “take pictures at HQ”… and then force him into their SUV anyway. That is deeply alarming. Law enforcement is not allowed to detain people first and figure out who they are later without lawful justification. Detaining someone without verifying identity, without probable cause, and without allowing them to present ID raises serious Fourth Amendment concerns. You cannot seize a person just to “check” who they are. This also mirrors what DHS has now openly admitted: that people are being detained first and sorted out later based on suspicion alone. That means innocent people, minors, and U.S. citizens are being taken into custody without verification, without charges, and without due process. If the government can forcibly detain someone simply to identify them, that is not law enforcement… that is unlawful detention.

@TheJFreakinC - Jesus Freakin Congress

#7: https://t.co/xjCRv03mX8

@TheJFreakinC - Jesus Freakin Congress

🚨BREAKING: WARNING — DISTURBING FOOTAGE Yesterday in Minneapolis, ICE agents brutally beat and illegally arrested a legal U.S. resident… all caught on camera. In the video, five ICE agents are seen on top of a man who is face down on the concrete. One agent repeatedly knees him in the face while the man does not resist. He is motionless, in pain, and screaming in agony. The assault only stops when the agent realizes a legal observer is filming. This is not an allegation. It is recorded violence. And it gets worse. The man, identified as Juan Carlos, is currently unhoused and living out of his car. ICE agents unlawfully approached him, ripped him from his vehicle, violently beat him, arrested him, and transported him to the Whipple Detention Facility. Juan Carlos posed no threat. He is a legal U.S. resident. Yet, he was assaulted and treated like a criminal. While in custody, he began having difficulty breathing. Only then did agents transport him to a hospital, still in shackles. He had blood in his ears from the beating, yet, was denied medical care until he was in medical distress. Once at the hospital, ICE agents attempted to intimidate medical staff and interfere with care. After approximately two hours, they finally issued Juan Carlos a ticket and left. To be absolutely clear: -ICE agents beat a legal U.S. resident. -They illegally arrested him. -They attempted to hold him in a detention facility. -They withheld medical care until his condition worsened. -They only backed down once there were witnesses, video evidence, and hospital staff present. If Juan Carlos had not been taken to the hospital… a place with mandated witnesses and documentation… it is very possible a legal U.S. resident would still be sitting in an immigration detention center today. And this is the part they don’t want you to realize: Immigration detention is a profit-driven system. Private prison corporations make money by keeping beds full. Every illegal arrest, every unlawful hold, every person thrown into a detention center without cause is revenue for a private company. When law enforcement agencies can illegally beat and attempt to warehouse legal residents for profit, this stops being about immigration enforcement and becomes a business model built on human suffering, and human trafficking. This is not a misunderstanding. This is not “questioning.” This is state violence, enabled by a system that profits from illegal confinement. And it will continue until it is forced to stop.

@TheJFreakinC - Jesus Freakin Congress

#8: https://t.co/Dw9GsAsYZL

@TheJFreakinC - Jesus Freakin Congress

🚨BREAKING: ICE agents were caught on video illegally detaining a U.S. citizen in Richfield, Minnesota. In the video, ICE agents surround a man who is already on his knees on the pavement, with his hands raised, while agents stand over him and verify his citizenship. This alone is a serious constitutional violation. ICE does not have authority to detain U.S. citizens to check their immigration status. They also do not need someone on their knees to “verify” citizenship. And forcing someone into a compliance position on the ground without probable cause constitutes an unlawful detention under the Fourth Amendment. After agents confirm he is a U.S. citizen, the man stands up and begins yelling… visibly angry and shaken. The man is yelling at agents for swarming his car at gun point, a U.S. citizen, and forcing him out. Saying, “I could’ve died.” ICE agents then try to claim it was because of his registration. A line they often use, that still doesn’t justify their actions. What this video shows is federal agents detaining first, forcing compliance, then checking legality afterward… the opposite of how policing in a constitutional system is supposed to work. If ICE can force a U.S. citizen to the ground over a car they happen to be driving, citizenship no longer protects you. This isn’t a minor mistake. It’s a clear abuse of power and a violation of the Fourth Amendment, and every American should be outraged.

@TheJFreakinC - Jesus Freakin Congress

#9: https://t.co/9oHXWnqJ8P

@TheJFreakinC - Jesus Freakin Congress

🚨BREAKING: ICE agents admit on video that they illegally pulled over a car driving down a street in Minneapolis. In the video, multiple ICE agents are seen surrounding a civilian vehicle with several cars. Both back doors of the vehicle are open as agents stand around it. An ICE agent is heard saying: “We just want to make sure you are good, you were driving like a complete maniac, and the way that you’re acting, we have to verify if you are good, and then we will be out of here.” That statement matters… because ICE does not have general authority to conduct traffic stops. Immigration enforcement agents cannot pull someone over for alleged driving behavior. That power belongs to state and local law enforcement, not federal immigration officers. There is no claim of a specific crime. No explanation of probable cause. No warrant shown. Just ICE agents stopping a car, detaining the occupants, and admitting on camera that they initiated the stop based on how someone was “driving.” That is an unlawful stop. Under the Constitution, law enforcement cannot seize or detain someone without legal authority or probable cause. Blocking a vehicle, surrounding it with agents, opening doors, and questioning occupants is a seizure… and doing so without lawful authority is a violation of the Fourth Amendment. If ICE can pull over random cars, invent a reason, and detain people with no warrant and no authority, then the question isn’t whether this was illegal… It’s how many more unconstitutional stops they’ll get away with before someone gets hurt again.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 says: "Hey. We just wanna make sure that you guys are good. You're driving like a complete maniac. And the way that you're acting, we gotta verify if you're good and then we'll be out of here. You understand?" The other replies: "No."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hey. We just wanna make sure that you guys are good. You're driving like a complete maniac. And the way that you're acting, we gotta verify if you're good and then we'll be out of here. You understand? No.

@TheJFreakinC - Jesus Freakin Congress

#10: https://t.co/OWT9Bh4tCj

@TheJFreakinC - Jesus Freakin Congress

🚨This video is terrifying, and it’s exactly why “just comply” does not protect you from ICE/Border Patrol agents, even as U.S. citizens, and why you always film them. In North Carolina, ICE/Border Patrol agents illegally stopped two U.S. citizens. They questioned them without legal cause, took their licenses, and admitted on camera that the men were allowed to record. And they were still attacked. In the video, one man asks if he can film for his safety. The agent says yes, saying that he’ll “have to put his mask on.” The agents take their licenses, ask where they’re from, where they live, what they’re doing in the area, all without legal authority. The men cooperate anyway. Then the situation turns dangerous. Another agent suddenly tells the driver, “Turn off your video. You are being detained, so you are not free to record.” That is false. Recording law enforcement in public is legal, including during detention. The driver calmly refuses, keeps one hand on the steering wheel as instructed, and holds his phone in the other. That’s when the agent lunges for the phone. The agent throws himself into the car, trying to grab the device. When the driver moves it away, the agent assaults him. The agent then illegally opens the car door, something the driver correctly points out they are not allowed to do. The agents keep demanding the filming stop, as multiple agents keep reaching for the phone. Then they escalate again. They threaten arrest, grab the driver, and start hitting him and trying to drag him out of the car, even though he keeps saying, “We haven’t done anything wrong.” When they fail to pull him out, they back away, visibly angry. They turn on the passenger next. An agent grabs him, threatens handcuffs, and assaults him trying to force him out of the vehicle. When that doesn’t work, they start yelling conflicting commands, claiming the men are “interfering with an investigation.” An investigation into what? Their own illegal stop. At one point, an agent shouts that the men can’t interfere, while another tries… again… to grab the phone, almost certainly to stop or erase the recording. Only after all of this do the agents finally release them. Because they are U.S. citizens. Because the stop was illegal. And because the camera was still rolling. This is why you film ICE. This is why compliance doesn’t save you. This is why they hate cameras. If this hadn’t been recorded, this would be another lie in a report, another “resisting” accusation, another abuse buried and denied. Film them. Always.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 describes a tense encounter, asserting safety concerns and clarifying they were visiting parents in Spencer and live there. They refuse to provide a requested detail: “What’s your dad’s name?” and answer “You don’t gotta get the information.” The other party orders, “Hands where I can see them. Don’t move around. Be nice,” followed by statements that they are not detained: “We’re not detained.” The speaker notes, “I have that too on recording already, and you are not allowed to do this,” and is told to “Turn the phone off.” There are repeated directives to relax and stop moving, with insistence that they are not in a traffic stop: “You’re not in the fucking traffic stop.” The confrontation escalates with commands to come up, culminating in “Come on up. Come up. Come on up. You got the right one.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So I can from my safety. Right? What's that? I can recover from my safety? Sure. I'll put this on there. You said you're there with your parents? No. No. I said I went to go visit them. I live in Your parents? Yeah. I live in Spencer. What's your dad's name? You don't you don't gotta get the information. Hands where I can see them. Don't move around. Be nice. Okay. No. We're not detained. They haven't told you we detained. They didn't say nothing about it. I'm telling you right We're not detained. Phone now. Nope. I got that too on recording already, and you are not allowed to do this. They're even turning. Phone. Get off the phone. Turn the phone off. Say it again. You need to relax. Around. Stop moving around. I have to stop. Keep. You're not in the fucking traffic stop. Come on up. Get your fuck up. Come on up. Come on up. Come on up. You got the right one. Come up.

@TheJFreakinC - Jesus Freakin Congress

#11: https://t.co/hvRvDVBGJM

@TheJFreakinC - Jesus Freakin Congress

🚨BREAKING: ICE/Border Patrol agents are once again illegally arresting U.S. citizens in Minnesota. In the video, you can hear the agent ask for ID AFTER he assaulted, tackled and handcuffed the man. When the man asks why he’s being detained, the agent claims it’s because the car is registered to an undocumented immigrant. The man responds, “What? I’m a U.S. citizen.” Despite this, the agent grabs his wallet and drags him toward an unmarked van… still without verifying his identity. This isn’t law enforcement. This is reckless abuse of power. If ICE can assault, arrest, and transport a U.S. citizen without confirming their identity, then no one is “safe” under this system. This is what happens when agencies operate with impunity… and it’s exactly why these abuses must be documented, challenged, and stopped.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 raises questions and frustration during what appears to be a tense interaction with law enforcement or vehicle authorities. The sequence includes confusion about identification and vehicle ownership, and a demand for official information. Key points: - A request is made: “Do you have an ID on you?” followed by a directive to speak clearly, “Speak to the piss, miss. Wait. No. Don’t know.” - There is a confrontation about the vehicle: “Why why the fuck am I being put in or not? The vehicle that you’re driving is registered to an illegal immigrant. Is it your vehicle? What?” - The speaker expresses disbelief and concern: “Right. Go in here. For real, bro. What is wrong with you guys? The fuck? Fuck.” - A location reference is noted: “West Saint Paul.” - A request for space and safety: “Ma’am, can you do me a favor? Just stay back over there. Okay?” - A demand for accountability and identification: “I have the right to know his badge number. What is your badge number?”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Do you have an ID on you? Speak to the piss, miss. Wait. No. Don't know. Why why the fuck am I being put in or not? The vehicle that you're driving is registered to an illegal immigrant. Is it your vehicle? What? Right. Go in here. For real, bro. What is wrong with you guys? The fuck? Fuck. West Saint Paul. Ma'am, can you do me a favor? Just stay back over there. Okay? I have the right to know his badge number. What is your badge number?

@TheJFreakinC - Jesus Freakin Congress

#12: https://t.co/42WhxG4Ej4

@TheJFreakinC - Jesus Freakin Congress

🚨BREAKING: ICE/Border Patrol agents were posted up in a grocery store parking lot in Richfield, MN, stopping, detaining, and interrogating people based solely on how they look. This is racial profiling. It is illegal. In the video, an agent can be heard yelling at a bystander to “get back” while he illegally detains a random U.S. citizen and demands answers. No warrant. No probable cause. Just intimidation in a parking lot. Another person filming correctly informs the man of his rights, that he does not have to answer a single question. That is exactly what everyone should be doing in these situations. The moment multiple people started filming and asserting those rights, the agents suddenly backed off, got in their vehicle, and drove away. Because they knew they were violating the law. This is not “immigration enforcement.” This is unconstitutional harassment, and it only stops when people document it, speak up, and refuse to comply with illegal orders.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 issues a terse instruction sequence directed at someone present: first, to “Back off.” Then, to consider the option of not responding to “them,” followed by a firm directive to “Just don’t say anything.” The sequence culminates in an explicit expression of confusion or incredulity with the line, “What the fuck is this?” This single speaker’s comments convey a clear, multi-step control directive intended to alter the other person’s behavior in the moment. The initial directive, “Back off,” functions as a command to create distance or cease engagement, signaling that the speaker feels the situation or the other party warrants withdrawal or reduced interaction. The subsequent line, “You don’t have to respond to them,” reinforces the aim of disengagement, emphasizing autonomy in choosing whether to engage with the other party. The third directive, “Just don’t say anything,” further narrows permissible action to complete silence, removing the possibility of a spoken response and steering the recipient toward nonverbal comportment or radio silence, depending on the context of the interaction. The closing line, “What the fuck is this?” introduces a sudden emotional reaction—likely confusion, disbelief, or frustration—directly addressing the nature of the situation. The profanity underscores a high level of intensity or surprise, suggesting that whatever is unfolding has elicited a strong, immediate response from Speaker 0. Taken together, the lines present a coherent set of instructions aimed at minimizing interaction and exposure to the other party (“them”), coupled with a reaction that questions the premise or quality of the ongoing scenario. The sequence emphasizes control and restraint, urging silence and withdrawal, while also capturing an abrupt, exclamatory moment of perplexity or dissatisfaction.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Back off. You don't have to respond to them. Just don't say anything. What the fuck is this?

@TheJFreakinC - Jesus Freakin Congress

#13: https://t.co/yGzNMhhbIc

@TheJFreakinC - Jesus Freakin Congress

🚨BREAKING: ICE/Border Patrol agents are illegally racially profiling people at bus stops in New Jersey. Video shows agents surrounding bus stops and rounding people up, not because they committed crimes, not because they’re “the worst of the worst,” but because they look Latino and are on their way to work. This isn’t law enforcement. It’s intimidation. It’s harassment. It’s collective punishment based on skin color, and it’s happening in public, in broad daylight. If the government can disappear people for waiting for a bus, none of this is about safety, and all of it is about power.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The transcript captures a tense moment at a Bergen Lyon Avenue location near a White Castle, where Speaker 1 reports that ICE came by and grabbed people, stating, “ICE came by and grabbed people. They are targeting the bus stops. Again, they are targeting the bus stops.” Speaker 0 responds with anger, asking, “What are you doing?” and labeling the action as terrorism, saying, “You fucking terrorists. You’re a fucking terrorist.” The speakers describe the scene as individuals were taken from the area, emphasizing that the raids are focused on bus stops and the surrounding vicinity, including Fairview Avenue, with Speaker 1 asking, “How many other bus stops? How many other locations?” They urge vigilance for others, noting that “any moment a vehicle like this can't see into the window” due to tinted windows, warning that law enforcement came into the location and “grabbed people.” Speaker 1 reiterates the need to “be on point” and to “be aware of what you're doing,” urging people to stay attentive as they go about their day. Throughout, there is a sense of fear and urgency, with the speakers repeatedly calling attention to the raids and the targeting of public transit access points like bus stops. Additional exchanges include Speaker 0 directing, “Hey. Hey. No. No. No. You're not gonna scare me,” and Speaker 1 insisting, “Don't touch her. Don't touch her. Don’t touch her.” The overall message is a warning to community members about ICE activity at specific transit hubs and the potential for people to be detained, paired with strong emotional reactions to the perceived aggression and disruption.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: $50,000. This is what your fucking soul is worth? Speaker 1: How could you guys do this to us, man? You understand what you guys are fucking doing? Look at this shit. Look at this. Speaker 0: What are you doing? What are you doing? Hey. Hey. No. No. No. No. You're not gonna scare me. Speaker 1: Don't touch her. Don't touch her. Don't touch her. Back up. This morning, we came by to this location, Bergen Lyon Avenue at a White Castle. ICE came by and grabbed people. They are targeting the bus stops. Again, they are targeting the bus stops. Speaker 0: You fucking terrorists. You're a fucking terrorist. What are these people doing? What are these people doing? Going to work. Speaker 1: Fairview Avenue. You see? So they're targeting this area, guys. How many other bus stops? How many other locations? So, again, you gotta be on point. Just be aware of what you're doing. Be aware that any moment a vehicle like this can't see into the window. There are tints. They came into this location, and they grabbed people. So, again, we're letting you guys know, please be attentive.

@TheJFreakinC - Jesus Freakin Congress

#14: https://t.co/bmDo2E55Wo

@TheJFreakinC - Jesus Freakin Congress

🚨DHS lied again about a Border Patrol shooting in San Bernardino. U.S. citizens were illegally stopped, their windows smashed, and then shot at fourteen times while trying to DRIVE AWAY… with a TEENAGER inside the car. After the shooting, DHS tried to flip the story and charged the driver, Francisco Longoria, with assault on a federal officer. That charge collapses immediately on video. There were no agents and no vehicles in front of the car. No one was being threatened. No officer was in danger. On August 16, Border Patrol agents unlawfully detained a U.S. citizen traveling with his teenage son and his daughter’s boyfriend. Agents demanded identification without legal cause. When the family did not comply, agents smashed the vehicle’s windows… an unlawful escalation and destruction of property. Francisco drove away in fear. As the car was fleeing, agents opened fire 14 times. DHS later claimed the shooting was “self-defense,” saying the driver “forced a CBP officer to discharge his firearm.” That is a lie. The videos clearly show no imminent threat, no officer in the vehicle’s path, and no legal justification for deadly force. Fleeing is not a capital offense. Law enforcement is not allowed to shoot people for driving away. The charges against Francisco were eventually dropped. But, the agents who illegally detained U.S. citizens, smashed their windows, and fired 14 rounds at a car carrying a teenager? They faced no consequences. So, the question isn’t whether DHS lied… The question is: how many citizens have to be shot at before federal agents are held accountable for violating the Constitution?

Video Transcript AI Summary
Francisco Longoria’s case unfolded in San Bernardino, Southern California. He was stopped in his car with his teenage son in the passenger seat and another man in the back seat by border patrol agents. The situation is depicted in two separate cell phone videos and a video from a surveillance camera across the street. In these videos, one border patrol agent is seen smashing the car’s glass. Then Longoria drives away. Importantly, the surveillance video across the street clearly shows there were no federal agents or federal vehicles in front of or in any way in the path of Longoria’s vehicle when he drove away, yet that moment is when a border patrol agent discharged his firearm at him multiple times. The Department of Justice charged Longoria with assault on an officer. However, prosecutors dropped the case within less than a month of filing it. This is not an isolated outcome; it is part of a broader pattern observed in several cases. The narrative notes that this dropping of charges is not unique to Longoria’s case, and that there are other instances where cases have been thrown out by judges. From the reviewed material, only four of the cases examined actually have ongoing criminal prosecutions. This total is described as a much smaller number than might be expected given the DHS’s public claims accusing individuals of assaulting federal officers. The speaker underscores that assault on a federal officer is a serious and prosecutable charge, yet the current landscape shows relatively few active prosecutions amid numerous accusations. In summary, Longoria’s episode involved border patrols, a glass-breaking incident, and Longoria’s subsequent drive-away during which a border patrol agent fired multiple shots. The DOJ dropped the assault-on-officer charge against Longoria in under a month, and among similar cases, only a minority remain under active prosecution, with four cases still ongoing. This pattern is highlighted as notable in the discussion of how these cases are proceeding relative to the public accusations by DHS.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Let's focus on the case of Francisco Longoria. It happened here in SoCal in San Bernardino. He was stopped in his car with his teenage son in the passenger seat, another man in the back seat by border patrol agents, where you're seeing here in these two separate cell phone videos. One of the border patrol agents smashes the glass, another thing that happens frequently, and then Longoria drives away. In these two videos as well as in a video from a surveillance camera across the street, it's very clear that there were no federal agents or federal vehicles in front of or in any way in the way of Longoria's vehicle when he drove away, and yet that was the moment where a border patrol agent discharged his firearm at him multiple times. You know, the feds charged Longoria. The DOJ charged Longoria with assault on an officer, but that case was dropped. Prosecutors dropped. They voluntarily withdrew the case within less than a month of filing it, and that's not the only one of these cases where exactly that has happened or cases has been have been thrown out by judges. Only four of the cases that we looked at, Katie, actually have an ongoing criminal prosecutions, which is a much smaller a much smaller number than you would expect from all the instances that DHS has publicly accused people of assaulting federal officers, is, of course, a very serious and prosecutable. You know, the other

@TheJFreakinC - Jesus Freakin Congress

#15: https://t.co/osV0EUPjcH

@TheJFreakinC - Jesus Freakin Congress

🚨 BREAKING: ICE is now disappearing Native Americans. ICE and Border Patrol are not protecting anyone. They are trafficking and disappearing POC under the cover of “immigration enforcement”... And now, in Minnesota, agents are taking Oglala Sioux tribal members, U.S. citizens, Indigenous people on their own land, and effectively vanishing them. Tribal leadership has been desperately trying to locate them. No charges. No transparency. No confirmation of where they are being held. Just federal agents grabbing unhoused Native men and refusing to account for them. If this were about undocumented immigrants, tribal members wouldn’t be on the list. If this were about “criminals,” tribal governments wouldn’t be searching for their own people like they’ve been abducted. This is what trafficking by the state looks like: • Target people who are poor, unhoused, or marginalized • Snatch them during coordinated raids • Move them between agencies and facilities • Refuse to disclose locations • Pretend it’s “procedure” They are doing this to Black, Latino and Asian communities every day… and now they’re doing it to Native people, the original citizens of this land, protected by treaties the federal government is legally bound to honor. When Native Americans can be disappeared by ICE, no one is “safe.” This is not law enforcement. This is not immigration policy. This is a system that treats POC as disposable bodies… and calls it national security.

Video Transcript AI Summary
A representative from the Oglala Sioux Tribe notes that one member has been released, but the other three could not be located. The council members gained access to the facility but were unable to find their three tribal members today, and they claim they are not classifying them by nationality, acknowledging that tribal members are citizens of the United States since 1924. They state that there is nobody more American than American Indians, and they could not locate them today, so they will continue on. They assert that we are America. They question how Native Americans could be targeted and imprisoned by immigration and customs enforcement officers, declaring that such targeting is legally impossible.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And one of them has been released, but they couldn't locate the other three. So the council members here who are they're all elected officials of the Oglala Sioux tribe, and they gained access to the facility, and they couldn't find their three tribal members. They're they're not they they claim that they're not classifying them by their nationality, which tribal members are also citizens of The United States since 1924. You know, there's nobody more American than American Indians, but we they were unable to find them here today, and so they're gonna continue on. They don't understand that we are America. How could you possibly target Native Americans and with immigration and customs enforcement officers and then imprison us? That is impossible. It's legal legally impossible to do that.

@TheJFreakinC - Jesus Freakin Congress

#16: https://t.co/ffkTMDF6aR

@TheJFreakinC - Jesus Freakin Congress

🚨BREAKING: ICE agents broke into another family’s home without a warrant in Minneapolis, a blatant violation of the Fourth Amendment, and illegally detained a U.S. citizen, half-naked, in subzero temperatures. Yesterday, ICE agents showed up at a Hmong family’s home, forced their way inside without a warrant, trashed the house, put a gun to the daughter-in-law’s head, and dragged the father out wearing only boxers, refusing to let him put on clothes, while it was -9 degrees outside. Then it gets worse. He is a naturalized U.S. citizen. ICE illegally entered his home, illegally detained him, drove him around for over an hour, interrogated and fingerprinted him, and only after realizing they had no authority to hold him, quietly dumped him back at his house like nothing happened. No warrant. No charges. No consequences. This isn’t immigration enforcement… It’s armed home invasions, constitutional violations, and state-sanctioned kidnapping. And if they can do this to a U.S. citizen in his own home, they can do it to you.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker begins by referring to “the plates,” indicating something about license plates or identification, and then describes a tense incident involving a van. They state that a van “tried to run us over,” specifically mentioning that it attempted to strike them and their mother. The speaker notes that they managed to seize or stop a man associated with the event, saying, “Nomás agarraron a ese señor,” which translates to “They just grabbed that man.” They identify the man as Chinese, adding the detail that “he was taking a bath” at the time this occurred. The overall account focuses on the attempted vehicle confrontation, the proximity to their safety, and the subsequent capture or custody of a man described as Chinese who, according to the speaker, was bathing during the incident. The speaker’s statements present a sequence: showing or referencing plates, an aggressive van aiming to strike them and their mother, and the capture of a Chinese man who was in the act or situation and was bathing. The language conveys a moment of danger, followed by the intervention that resulted in detaining the man involved.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Estas son las placas. Y esa van, esa van nos quiso atropellar. Esa van nos quiso atropellar a mí y a mi mamá. Nomás agarraron a ese señor, es un chino, pero se estaba bañando.
Saved - February 2, 2026 at 10:08 PM

@GooBiiSnacks - Mike Honcho

Someone that went to law school should have a memory that doesnt fade in less than 2 months. These are YOUR posts😂🫠 https://t.co/k1Vm4BA7KO

@KimWexlerMAJD - Kimberly “Kim” Wexler MA JD

I was in law school when the Homeland Security Act was passed. I remember conversations about how DHS would consolidate far too much executive power into the hands of a single cabinet secretary. I have written about how Mayorkas’ ultra vires acts directly violated the mission of the department. But this is a post about why Americans should refrain from taking dangerous actions at anti-ICE demonstrations.

@KimWexlerMAJD - Kimberly “Kim” Wexler MA JD

🔥RIGHT TO FLEE is NOT A THING🔥 There is no “right to try to escape” or flee a law enforcement encounter simply because one believes the encounter may be unlawful. In fact, resisting or evading a federal officer is a crime, and attempting to evade law enforcement tends to lead https://t.co/nISLbBTeTj

Saved - March 29, 2026 at 2:45 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I report that Border Patrol agents tried to arrest a man inside a private home without a warrant. They were in the front yard as the homeowner and the man told them to leave private property. An agent grabbed him; he crawled toward the door and went inside. The agents followed, despite pleas to stop. This contravenes Payton v. New York and Lange v. California, which bar warrantless entry into a home and hot pursuit for a nonserious offense.

@TheJFreakinC - Jesus Freakin Congress

🚨BREAKING: Border Patrol agents were caught attempting to force an arrest inside a private home… without a warrant. The video shows agents were already in someone’s front yard trying to detain a man. The homeowner comes out and tells them to leave, because they are on private property. The man they’re trying to detain is saying the same thing… you’re on private property… get out. Instead of backing off… an agent grabs him around the waist, trying to tackle the man. The man breaks free, crawling to the door, and goes inside the house. At that point, this should’ve been over. Because under the Constitution, entering a home without a warrant is one of the clearest lines law enforcement are not allowed to cross. But, they cross it anyway. One agent grabs his foot as he’s going in… and then both agents follow him inside the home, while the homeowner is actively telling them to get out. Over and over. This is exactly what the Supreme Court ruled against in Payton v. New York… law enforcement cannot enter a home to make an arrest without a warrant. And in Lange v. California… they made it clear you don’t get to chase someone into their home, for a non-serious offense, and call it “hot pursuit.” They were told to leave private property… and didn’t. They attempted a detention without respecting that boundary. And then forced their way into a home anyway. All without a warrant.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: "Hey. You're private property. You're on private property. Hey. You're on private property. Get the fuck out. Yeah. I told you. You're on private property."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hey. You're private property. You're on private property. Hey. You're on private property. Get the fuck out. Yeah. I told you. You're on private property.
View Full Interactive Feed