reSee.it - Related Post Feed
@loudmouthgrant - ✨CONSPIRACY FACTS ✨
@elonmusk https://t.co/29TxguH7Qk
Video Transcript AI Summary
Most members of Congress lack understanding of the system, and those who do are afraid to speak up. An elite group of people, along with the corporations they run, have gained control over various aspects of our lives, including energy, food supply, education, and healthcare. They achieve this control by manipulating the world of finance and the source of money. The major banks, controlled by the moneyed elite, provide special loan rates to big corporations, ultimately giving them control. The Federal Reserve, disguised as a government-owned system but privately owned, has been criticized by many, including former Congressman Lewis T. McFadden and Senator Barry Goldwater. The founding fathers, having witnessed the negative effects of privately owned central banks, warned against their accumulation of wealth and power. The battle over who issues money has been a pivotal issue in US history, with the money changers using various means to maintain control. The media's power and influence have also become a concern, as biased and false news spreads easily on social media platforms. This poses a threat to democracy. The video also emphasizes the importance of Bitcoin as a decentralized network that cannot be controlled or stopped.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Most members of Congress just don't understand the system, and the few who do are afraid to speak up.
Speaker 1: As difficult as it was for me, I have come to an inescapable and profoundly disturbing conclusion. I believe that an elite group of people When the corporations they run have gained control over not just our energy, food supply, education, and health care, but over virtually every of our lives. And they do it by controlling the world of finance, not by creating more value, but by actually controlling the source of money. When I followed the money, I found that it took me up the levels of a pyramid. Here we are at the bottom level going about our daily lives.
Above us is government, people who are given a monopoly on force And use it to tax and control us whether or not we agree. But who controls them? At the next level are the corporations. Many would Say that it is now corporations and not nation states that rule the world. They call it a To acquire the world's resources and control the markets.
This must have access to cheap money. The big corporations get their loans at special rates from the banks, which means that those who control the major banks, the moneyed elite, ultimately control the corporations. As I followed the money, I've learned that almost everything I once believed about money is simply not true.
Speaker 2: The problem is we have a privately owned central bank system, in the United States disguised as a government owned system. Now if you look in the the, telephone book here in the Washington DC area, you look up for Federal Reserve in the blue government pages, It's not there. It's in the white pages right next to Federal Express. It's a privately owned central bank.
Speaker 0: One of the most outspoken critics in congress of the Fed was the former chairman of the House Banking and Currency Committee during the Great Depression years. Lewis t McFadden, Republican of Pennsylvania, Begna said in 1932, we have in this country one of the most corrupt institutions the world has ever known. I refer to the Federal Reserve Board. This evil institution has impoverished the people of the United States and has practically bankrupted our government. Senator Barry Goldwater was a frequent critic of the Fed.
Most Americans have no real understanding of the operation of the international money lenders. The accounts of the Federal Reserve System have never been audited. It operates outside the control of Congress and manipulates the credit of the United States. The founding fathers knew the evils of a privately owned central bank. First of all, they had seen how the privately owned British central bank, the Bank of England, had run up the British national debt to such an extent that had run up the British national debt to such an extent that parliament had been forced to place unfair taxes on the American colonies.
And Franklin claimed that this was the real cause of the American Revolution. Most of the founding fathers realized the potential dangers of banking and feared bankers' accumulation of wealth and power. Jefferson put it this way.
Speaker 3: I sincerely believe that Banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people to whom it properly belongs.
Speaker 0: That succinct statement of Jefferson is in fact the solution to all our economic problems today.
Speaker 4: Here's how it works. They print it, we borrow it, and we pay them interest. This is garbage. This is garbage. Your people in South Africa, you have Iran.
Right? That's going to 0. That's going to 0. Autorex. This is going to 0 too.
Euros are going to 0. The yen's going to 0. The Chinese currency is going to It's all going to 0 against Bitcoin. If you don't understand that yet, you're gonna be impoverished. You're gonna be on the street.
You're gonna be begging. You're gonna be out Business. You're gonna be toast.
Speaker 0: James Madison, the main author of the constitution, agreed. Interestingly, he called those behind the central bank Team, money changers. Madison strongly criticized their actions.
Speaker 3: History records that the money changers have used Every form of abuse, intrigue, deceit, and violent means possible to maintain their control over governments by controlling money and its Issuance.
Speaker 0: The battle over who gets to issue our money has been the pivotal issue throughout the history of the United States. Wars are fought over it. Depressions are caused to acquire it. Yet after World War one, this battle was rarely mentioned in newspapers or history books. Why?
I, by World War one, the money changers with their dominant wealth had seized control of most of the nation's Press.
Speaker 5: The sharing of biased and false
Speaker 4: news has become all too common on social media. More alarming The power of the police
Speaker 5: is saying repeatedly are true without checking facts first.
Speaker 4: Unfortunately, some of our members are getting used to their platforms to push Their own personal lives and agenda to control to control exactly one of the unique things. And this is extremely dangerous to our democracy.
Speaker 0: This is Extremely dangerous to our democracy.
Speaker 5: This is extremely dangerous to our democracy.
Speaker 1: This is extremely dangerous to our democracy.
Speaker 5: This is extremely dangerous to our democracy.
Speaker 1: This is extremely dangerous to our democracy.
Speaker 5: This is extremely dangerous to our democracy.
Speaker 0: This is extremely dangerous to our democracy.
Speaker 5: This is extremely dangerous To our democracy, this is extremely dangerous to our democracy. This is extremely dangerous to our democracy.
Speaker 1: This is extremely dangerous to our democracy.
Speaker 4: This is extremely dangerous our democracy.
Speaker 5: This is extremely dangerous to our democracy.
Speaker 6: This is extremely dangerous to our democracy.
Speaker 1: This is extremely dangerous to our democracy.
Speaker 7: All the Trump supporters that I talked 2
Speaker 8: who were Trump voters.
Speaker 5: He's trying to undermine the media, trying to make up his own facts, and it could be that he can actually control, Exactly what people think, and that is the that is your job.
Speaker 4: Yeah. That is your job.
Speaker 6: You have owners. They own you. They Own everything. They own all the important land. They own and control the corporations.
They've long since bought and paid for the senate, the congress, the state houses, the city halls. They got the judges in their back And they own all the big media companies, so they control just about all of the news and information you get to hear. They got you by the balls.
Speaker 9: These authoritarians Hate Bitcoin and they for the same reason. Why do they hate Joe Rogan? Because they can't control him. He's not subject to to their authoritarian power. Why do they hit Bitcoin?
Because they can't control it.
Speaker 10: There's only one useful thing that any of us can do every day when we get up. One thing that matters above all. That one thing is convince someone to convert some other form of property into Bitcoin.
Speaker 11: By a show of hands, how many people hold Bitcoin? Not bad. Not bad. What I would recommend highly for anybody who doesn't get off 0, like, Today, it is, it's it it it it, we'll talk a little bit about it. But but what is it, it's an open, decentralized network That's open for anybody, and no one can stop it.
It's impossible to stop. It's impossible to stop.
@TuckerCarlson - Tucker Carlson
@elonmusk He really did. Confirmed.
@kiwiwayne2 - Kiwiwayne2 ex Kiwiwayne1
Nothing to see here!!! It’s all misinformation 🙄 https://t.co/53CSuzfVbV
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker analyzed the top 10 batches with high death counts and mortality rates. They found that all of these batches were from Pfizer. Batch number 1 had 711 vaccinated and 152 deaths, resulting in a 21% mortality rate. The expected mortality rate is 0.75%. These batches included all age groups, not specific to one age group. Other batches in the top 10 had mortality rates of 17%, 15%, and 4%. The speaker concludes that the chances of these batches not being a killer are extremely low, with odds of $100,000,000,000 to 1.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Okay. So what I did with the data was, look at the top 10, batches that were had a high death count, high mortality rate, and I put them on a chart, which you can see up there. So it's got a a batch ID. So what I did was our internal batch ID. I counted the number of vaccinated within that batch, and then I found out who was dead.
Speaker 1: Well, let's have a look.
Speaker 0: And so we then look at the percentage of the ratio.
Speaker 1: So do we know if these are all Pfizer, the top ten?
Speaker 0: Yes, they are.
Speaker 1: And this is Pfizer's batch number 1. We've had 711 from batch number 1 vaccinated. 152 of those died, which makes a 21%
Speaker 0: Percentage, yes.
Speaker 1: Death mortality rate from
Speaker 0: mortality rate.
Speaker 1: They are high. Now what's our normal that we would expect? Should be the mortality
Speaker 0: rate 0.75. 0.75. These batches are against all age groups as well. It's not one particular batch for 1 particular age group. It's across all ages.
So all the vaccination centers, whoever rocked up on the day, whatever age you were, and it would average out. It would all average out. So there's not 1 particular batch that points to 1 particular age group.
Speaker 1: So looking as if batch number 8, second one, yeah. 221, Jabs, 38, that's a 17% mortality rate. Batch number 3 here, And we've got 48 out of 310. So that's a 15%. And if we go right down the the in the top ten, batch 71, 11,000 vaccinated with batch number 71, 498 dead, and that's a 4%.
Now you say down the bottom on the screen, could you just tell us what this is saying?
Speaker 0: We
Speaker 1: The chances of these batches not being a killer are $100,000,000,000 to 1. Explain that as a statistician.
Speaker 0: Yes.
@txind1836 - TXIND1836🦅
@elonmusk 😂🤣 https://t.co/EJIOQSJjOq
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 reveals that Twitter has reduced its staff by 80%, which amounts to about 20% of the original size. Despite the significant reduction, the company is still able to function efficiently. The speaker suggests that running Twitter does not require a large workforce, unless the company aims to be an activist organization or prioritizes censorship.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Your staff did you fire at Twitter? One of the great business stories of the year. I think we're about 20% of the original size. So 80% left? Yes.
So A lot of people voluntarily Sure. Sure. But but it's 80% are gone from the day you chose. That's correct. Yes.
So how do you run the company with only 20% of the staff? Turns out, you don't need, that all that many people to run Twitter. But 80%? That's a lot. Yes.
Over I mean, if you're if you're not trying to run some sort of, glorified activist organization, With with and you don't care that much about censorship, then, you can really let go of a lot of people, turns out.
@patel_patriot - Jon Herold
Lol Grok basically calling @elonmusk a hypocrite https://t.co/OaJrZ8cpDK
@Johnson84Tj - Memelord ‘84
@elonmusk Hahaha. https://t.co/3ycIr161Gy
Video Transcript AI Summary
I am Big Chief Son of a Bear. I carry tomahawks, wear straw capes, and ride horses. I am proud to be an Indian.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What big chief son of a bear and I'll have tote and poke, Tom a hawks and straw capoose, whip and swell. Don't tip through. I'm an Indian
@THeinrich22 - Todd With Trump
Dear Elon, Is this true? Signed, All true American Patriots https://t.co/4XW4mgtjpd
Video Transcript AI Summary
Chris Wray informed Congress that he guarantees the election security of the United States. However, there are concerns about the FBI's involvement with social media giants like Twitter and Facebook. In the past, the FBI's election security task force would advise these companies on what content to restrict, which is not their role. The media should be outraged that a law enforcement agency is dictating their content. It seems that the focus is on preventing pro-Trump information from being shared. This raises questions about the integrity of the upcoming election, as these contracts are still in place.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Cash, I love having
Speaker 1: you on the program because, 1, you have been so professionally right. You predict things months years before they happen. You've done so on this program. I we probably should build our own cash stinger, where it's like somebody telling the future. Right?
Like, the the the great whatever Johnny Carson used to do. Right? Where he where he'd hold stuff up to his head and he'd predict things.
Speaker 0: Well, I got one for you. I wasn't planning on rolling this out yet, but if you want Sure.
Speaker 1: Gotcha. Okay. Well, I was gonna continue my compliment, but please.
Speaker 0: Alright. No. So Chris Wray just to congress or inform congress that he is guaranteeing the election security of the United States of America. Now you gotta ask yourself, wait a sec. What does that mean?
How can how can he do that? Somebody call Elon Musk, Mark Zuckerberg, And the other guys. And ask them if they have canceled every one of their contracts with the FBI's election task force to censor United States information. Ask them. Ask them if taxpayer funded contracts are still in play From the FBI and DOJ to these social media giants and whether or not they are meeting with them weekly and monthly with FBI leadership To talk election security.
Speaker 1: So this is still ongoing, what you're saying? Like, the same the same censorship regime for social media to ding people or ban them from questioning the results of the election. This is still ongoing.
Speaker 0: No. The same people that met leading up to the last election, the FBI And Twitter, the FBI, and Facebook, and their 80 person election security task force would go there and tell Suggest, oh, you can't put this out. You shouldn't put that out. It is not the FBI's job to tell media companies what they should and should not put out. And the media should be revolting that a law enforcement agency is dictating to the media what they can and can't put out.
But, of course, they're giving them a hall pass because What they don't want them putting out is anything pro Trump. And as we spent 1,000,000 tens of 1,000,000 of dollars As taxpayers, allowing for this election rig job to happen, and we are essentially allowing it to happen again because no one at these companies It's shredding these contracts. Wow.
@BillSmi72331024 - Bill Smith
@KanekoaTheGreat @elonmusk @Tesla Boy does this clip ring true——-> https://t.co/ULnTxlzV85
Video Transcript AI Summary
What matters is not which party controls our government, but whether the people control it. For too long, a small group in our capital has benefited from the government while the people have suffered. The establishment protected itself, not the citizens. But that's all changing, starting here and now.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What truly matters is not which party controls our government, but whether our government is controlled by the people. For too long, a small group in our nation's capital, has reaped the rewards of government while the people have borne the cost. The establishment protected itself, but not the citizens of our country. That all changes starting right here and right now.
@TheMarcitect - The Architect.
Watch how fast this story disappears into the abyss. Thoughts.. @elonmusk https://t.co/rAj46xQwWq
@CubbyKuma - Hootch
@MarsNAO @Diane_Jackson7 @X @elonmusk this is all i need to know about elon https://t.co/H9pwzc31jg
@DesmondConstan5 - Desmond A Constantine
@iamnot_elon I agree with her https://t.co/XmCEgLTjyq
Video Transcript AI Summary
I was at President Trump's rally in Ohio and noticed a security failure. There were snipers positioned strategically, but someone in the security detail seems compromised. We need answers. President Trump, we support you.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I was right behind president Trump at his rally in Ohio, and this security failure wasn't purpose. There are snipers on every roof around the perimeter in every strategic position. Someone in his security detail is clearly compromised, and I want answers. President Trump, we have your back.
@SaltyGoat17 - SaltyGoat
@CollinRugg These people are evil. This is what Elon put out. Un freaking believable!! https://t.co/BKUKrQROqs
@AmericanDebunk - American Debunk
@elonmusk We are the greatest source of hoax debunks on the planet https://t.co/FYSzQppgSD
Video Transcript AI Summary
The marchers in Charlottesville chanted anti-Semitic slogans like "Jews will not replace us" and used phrases linked to Nazi ideology. Many viewers were outraged by this. The former president commented on the protest, mentioning that while there were bad people in the group, there were also "very fine people on both sides." This statement sparked controversy, as it implied that some participants were not associated with the neo-Nazis or white nationalists, who should be condemned entirely.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The white nationalist and neo nazi marchers in Charlottesville chanting that Jews will not replace us, but their words, blood and soil, Jews will not replace us, blood and soil was a Nazi slope glued to the boat. Now most people watching that would be outraged. The former president said this.
Speaker 1: They showed him a star. Excuse me. The protester They didn't put some stuff to ask you. And you had some very bad people in that group, but you also had people that were very fine people on both sides.
Speaker 0: Very fine people among Americans that night chanting Nazi slogans. You had people, and I'm not
Speaker 1: talking about the neo nazis or the white nationalists because they should be condemned totally.
@BIPOCracism - BIPOC Doing Racism
Is an Indian posting on Elons account? “Do you make this lie?” “Do you make it” Two separate occasions https://t.co/mJ5ZQubtPU
@ever_e_mann - Ever Earnest Mann
@elonmusk If you listen to what he’s saying, he’s being disingenuous. What’s he hiding? https://t.co/JXi7WJAXZF
Video Transcript AI Summary
When long-time politicians treat honesty, decency, truth, and the rule of law lightly, it negatively impacts politics. Their calls for inquiries often seem motivated by a desire to align with far-right agendas rather than genuine concern.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And when politicians, and I mean politicians, who sat in government for many years, are casual about honesty, decency, truth and the rule of law, calling for inquiries because they want to jump on a bandwagon of the far right, then that affects politics.
@elonmusk - Elon Musk
Video Transcript AI Summary
Breaking news: The Southport stabbings, where Axel Rudacubana murdered three children at a dance class, have sparked national outrage. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper criticized the ease with which he ordered a knife online despite his violent past. The Prime Minister labeled him the "two-click killer" and promised stricter online knife sales regulations. Radio presenter James O'Brien connected the incident to Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk, suggesting they should be held accountable, despite their lack of involvement. This reflects a broader trend of avoiding uncomfortable truths in society. The government continues to deflect responsibility, focusing on online hate rather than addressing the root causes of violence. For more insights, consider subscribing to platforms that provide balanced news coverage.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Breaking news. Southport stabbings caused by knife. Axel Rudacubana's murder of 3 children and wounding of others at a Taylor Swift dance class shocked the nation last summer and served as the spark which ignited the riots. It is therefore with great relief that I can report that the government and their media lackeys have finally worked out what the problem is. Is it the fact that he was referred to PREVENT, the government program designed to identify and deradicalize potential terrorists on 3 separate occasions?
Is it the fact that the police had visited the family home numerous times in the months leading up to the attack? Is it the fact that up to 40,000 potential Islamic terrorists are on a government watch list? These are all reasonable questions, of course, which is precisely why they're not being asked. Instead, home secretary Yvette Cooper today explained that it was a total disgrace that the murderer was easily able to order a knife on Amazon despite having a previous conviction for violence and being just 17. The prime minister, Keir Starmer, described Rudo Cubana as the 2 click killer.
The result, Cooper has promised to bring in stronger measures to tackle knife sales online in the crime and policing bill this spring. Rejoice, citizens of Great Britain. Your safety is now assured. And if for some reason you're not satisfied by this approach, help is available. Radio presenter James O'Brien, the undisputed leader of Britain's moron industrial complex, whose job it is to tell normies what to believe in order to avoid the cognitive dissonance of having to face reality, is on hand to help.
He begins reasonably enough by pointing out that the killer bought his knife on Amazon. Why is this significant? After all, Rudacubana could have simply taken a knife from his parents' kitchen or waited a week for his 18th birthday and bought a knife from any shop in the country. It's significant, O'Brien explains, because
Speaker 1: Amazon, of course, is owned by Jeff Bezos. Jeff Bezos was sitting in the row behind Donald Trump at the latter's inauguration.
Speaker 0: Oh, how quickly the plot thickens. O'Brien continues this stunning bout of investigative journalism by exclusively revealing that one of the thousands of videos Rito Kobayna watched before committing his crimes was published on X, which as you all know is owned by Elon Musk, who not only got on stage at the inauguration, but did the Nazi salutes according to James O'Brien.
Speaker 1: The man who owns the platform that still hosts and, and holds the footage that the Southport Killer looked before he set off to that Taylor Swift dance class, he was not just sitting in the, row directly behind Donald Trump. He is the guy that got on stage and did the Nazi salute.
Speaker 0: Musk, of course, did no such thing, but was instead misrepresented by people like James O'Brien in a way that they would never do with politicians whose views they like and support. O'Brien concludes by stating that he is not given to hyperbole before suggesting that Bezos and Musk, 2 men who had nothing whatsoever to do with the Southport stabbings, are in fact the people we should be focusing on.
Speaker 1: The aligning of these planets is at the very least notable. But what the hell can a British government do to rein them in? Because that is the fight that they've picked.
Speaker 0: If you are somehow shocked by these developments, I envy you. Those of us who comment on these issues regularly are beginning to see a pattern. In 2021, sir David Ames, the member of parliament for South and West, was stabbed to death by Ali Harbi Ali, a British citizen of Somali descent with Islamist links. What was the response of David's colleagues? To bang on about online hate as if their friend had been killed by a tweet.
The sad reality is that we live in a society that is absolutely determined to avoid unpleasant truth in the false belief that if we bury our heads in the sand, our problems will go away. They won't. Contrary to popular myth, even ostriches do not actually bury their heads in the sand because it's stupid and it doesn't work. But that won't stop the government from trying and idiots like O'Brien from making them on. If you enjoy these videos, you should know that they go out on my Substack days, weeks, sometimes months ahead of time.
So head on over there now by clicking the link in the description and subscribe. I use Ground News every day to cut through the noise and find the truth. They gather articles from over 50,000 news sources around the world and help you break free from big tech algorithms and echo chambers, something that's incredibly important in our polarized time. Go to ground dot news slash trigonometry to see how it works. A feature I rely on is the blind spot feed, which highlights stories that are disproportionately covered by either the left or the right.
With this, I know I'm never missing important news. It's great for recognizing your own biases and gaining a balanced perspective. Here's a story that is getting no coverage on the right whatsoever. Russia open to hearing Trump's proposals for ending the war, an official says. And here's one that doesn't appear in left leaning outlets.
Majority of Americans support Trump's plan to declare emergency at the border. Ground News helps you see the bigger picture with insights like the number of sources reporting, their reliability, and their bias distribution across the political spectrum. You can't get this type of news analysis anywhere else. Trigonometry viewers who subscribe through our link can get 40% off their unlimited access Vantage plan, the same plan that we use. Just click the link in the description or scan the QR code and subscribe at ground.news/trigonometry.
Your subscription helps Ground News bring transparency back to the media, which is something I fully endorse.
@mrshelby101 - Mr Shelby
@elonmusk Lady tells the truth? Your thoughts on this- https://t.co/F08GsKqiLS
Video Transcript AI Summary
If you genuinely believe Elon Musk's gesture was a Nazi salute, you lack the intelligence for politics and should reconsider sharing your opinions. This outrage is misplaced; it's a reaction to the growing support for the right. Recently, Donald Trump won a $15 million defamation lawsuit against ABC, highlighting the difficulty of proving bad intent in such cases. This reflects a broader distrust in the media. Additionally, Elon Musk, who is autistic, exhibits behaviors that some may misinterpret. His excitement and bluntness are part of his condition, not malicious intent. The media's portrayal of him is unfair, as this was merely an attempt to discredit the right that ultimately failed.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If you are someone who truly believe that what Elon Musk did was a Nazi salute, you are not intelligent enough to be in politics nor should you be sharing your opinion online. If anything, we should all be pointing and laughing at you because if you truly believe that he did that, then you truly believe all these democrats did one as well. So why weren't you outraged about it then? Because you knew that wasn't what they're doing the same way that when Elon Musk makes a statement saying from my heart to yours and does that motion, you know, he's not doing a Nazi salute. You're just so angry that you lost.
You're so angry that America woke up and is tired of the leftist bullshit that you've been pushing upon us for so long. So you're trying to say and do anything that will make people second guess themselves now supporting the right and it's not working. You're showing the world what an absolute clown you are. Donald Trump recently won a defamation lawsuit against ABC for $15,000,000 I want people to understand how hard it is for somebody at that level of fame to win a defamation law suit. Not only do you have to be able to prove that they lied, but you have to be able to prove so that they did it with bad intent towards you, that they purposely made a story up to make you look bad.
And he was able to prove it. And then you wonder why people sit here and say fake media say that they don't trust the news anymore because they lied to you. And this is not anything different. If anything, I honestly feel really bad for Elon Musk. Not that I agree with necessarily everything he says.
But people forget that this man is a diagnosed autistic man. There are going to be certain tics and behaviors and speech patterns that he has that other people aren't going to understand. As somebody with autism myself, I can attest to this. There's a lot of times where I think I'm being perfectly normal and nobody else does. So it's really sad to me to see the media vilify him for things that literally are just symptoms of autism.
And people sit there and they think that it's funny. No, he gets excited. He stims. He has certain vocal patterns. He's going to be a lot more blunt than most people would ever be.
And that's something that I appreciate. But a lot of people don't. They want to be lied to. They want to be sugar coated. But this was not a Nazi salute.
This was a sad attempt at the left to try to slander the right, and it just didn't work out that well for them.
@DOGE__news - (news) DOGE
Elon Musk: "It's a pretty good indication that if someone is using the word disinformation a lot, they are the ones creating the disinformation." https://t.co/Rjkuiq5vPZ
Video Transcript AI Summary
Prominent Democrats, including John Kerry, Tim Wallace, and Hillary, are allegedly saying that the First Amendment is a bad thing. These top-level Democrats view the First Amendment as an obstacle. The frequent use of the word "disinformation" is an indication that the speaker believes these individuals are creating disinformation. Those trying to suppress freedom of speech are considered the "bad guys." It is astonishing that this is happening in America in 2024.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: One prominent Democrat after another has been saying that freedom of speech, the first amendment, is is a is a is a bad thing. John Kerry. Yeah. John Kerry literally said that. Tim Wallace.
Tim. And and Tim Wallace. Yeah. And Hillary. Yeah.
Exactly. It's it's like a long list. It's it's they're they're not like, you know, mid level people in the it's like the top people in the Democratic Party are saying the first amendment's an obstacle, and and then they they use the word disinformation. Like, it's a pretty good indication that if someone's using the word disinformation a lot, they are the ones creating the disinformation. If you're trying to figure out, well, like, are the good guys?
Who are the bad guys? The the the people who are trying to suppress freedom of speech, they are the bad guys. You know? It's actually astonishing that that we're even in this position in 2024 in America. It's hard to even believe that this is real.
You know?
@RickyDoggin - A Man Of Memes
I agree with Elon! Do you? https://t.co/Rh0wZbrdcx
Video Transcript AI Summary
Fake NGOs are often fake charities, mostly run by Democrats, though Republicans may be involved to maintain silence. Billions of dollars are given to these Democrat-run NGOs, which then go through a network of additional NGOs. This is described as a giant money laundering scheme, where the terms NGO and money laundering are almost synonymous. Arrests are needed in this regard.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Fake NGOs. I think there needs to be a a number of arrests in that regard as well because these these are these are fake charities, where, mostly Democrats and wasn't both. It's I I don't wanna be fair. There's there's sometimes a little bit of Republican in there because they sometimes throw the Republicans a bone to say, hey. Be be quiet about this.
So it's it's it's it's that's that's that's where you start getting the uniparty thing going on. Mhmm. But it it is overwhelmingly to Democrats, and they they give these give billions of dollars to NGOs run by Democrats that then go through a whole network of additional gen NGOs. It's a giant money laundering scheme. Really, at at this point, I think the word NGO and money laundering are almost synonymous.
@sabback - Donna Marie
@TuckerCarlson "Maybe not everything is true that you've heard about me" https://t.co/6jPgpgvUhn
Video Transcript AI Summary
On 04/19/1995, a Gulf War veteran allegedly bombed the Oklahoma City Federal Building with a truck bomb he didn't build or rent, aided by a nonexistent passenger. The bomber was caught due to a missing license plate. The ATF, the supposed target, was empty that morning. The president vowed swift justice, but John Doe number two, identified by 24 witnesses, was deemed nonexistent by the FBI.
The prosecution didn't present CCTV footage of McVeigh and John Doe number two or explain the witnesses' accounts. They also didn't address government truck bomb testing or FBI informants. McVeigh and Nichols were convicted, but some insist the Ryder truck bomb couldn't have caused the damage, citing experts and a second explosive device that was found.
The FBI claims to have lost footage of McVeigh and John Doe number two. Terry Nichols alleges FBI involvement, but he was prevented from testifying. A bomb squad truck was present two hours before the blast, and someone called the Justice Department 24 minutes before the bombing to report it. Governor Keating's brother wrote a novel about a similar bombing with a character named Thomas McVeigh. McVeigh claimed to be a secret special forces operative with an implanted microchip. His execution was delayed due to withheld evidence, then carried out. No autopsy was performed, and the case was closed.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Are you the Oklahoma City bomber?
Speaker 1: Maybe one of the benefits of me talking to you today is that you'll see that maybe not everything is true that you've heard about me.
Speaker 2: On the morning of 04/19/1995, a decorated Gulf War combat vet blew up the Federal Building in Oklahoma City using a truck bomb that he didn't build and a rider truck that he didn't rent with the help of a passenger who didn't exist. Having just gotten away with the largest act of terrorism on US soil to date, the Fort Bragg train Special Forces Sheep Drip Dropout blended in with the crowd by making his getaway in a car without a license plate and was immediately pulled over. The ATF was the supposed target of the attack, but luckily, all of their agents were out of the office that morning. Later that day, the president boldly declared
Speaker 3: We will find the people who did this. And When we do, justice will be swift, certain, and severe. Except for
Speaker 0: John Doe number two. John Doe number two. John Doe number two.
Speaker 2: Who, according to the FBI, never existed. In McVeigh's unprecedented three and a half week trial, the prosecution didn't show the CCTV footage of him and John Doe number two parking the Ryder truck. Didn't explain why 24 separate witnesses mass hallucinated the existence of John Doe number two. Didn't explain why the government testing truck bombs and the army was storing rider trucks at Camp Gruber right before the bombing, and didn't talk to the FBI informants who blew the whistle on the plot. But they did collaborate with the CIA, and they did convict McVeigh as the lone wolf bomber and Terry Nichols as his bomb constructing accomplice.
Still, a bunch of crazy conspiracy theorists, including 300 bombing victims, insist on talking about facts and evidence and refuse to simply believe what they've been told a million times by people in tailored suits with well clothed hair. They quote the US army brigadier general the FBI crime lab whistleblower and the inventor of the neutron bomb who point out the physical impossibility that the Ryder truck bomb did the damage to the building, but that doesn't matter because if there were other bombs in the building that day, we would have heard about them.
Speaker 0: The second explosive was found and diffused. I think he said another phone.
Speaker 4: The justice department is reporting that a second explosive device has been found.
Speaker 0: They then found a third device, which was also larger than the first. And I see another bomb truck going, so apparently, they're gonna try to get out that third bomb.
Speaker 2: The FBI claims to have lost the footage showing Mubay and John Doe number two parking the truck in front of the Murrah Building that morning, but that's understandable because the bureau has a lot of important evidence to store. Terry Nichols insists the FBI was involved in the plot, but thankfully a judge has saved us trouble of listening to him by preventing lawyers from deposing him. There was a bomb squad truck parked across the street two hours before the blast, but that just shows the authorities were prepared for anything. And
Speaker 0: Other documents obtained by 2020 show that someone called executive secretary at office at the justice department in Washington and said the Morrow Building had been bombed, but this was twenty four minutes before the blast.
Speaker 2: But that just shows the public was unusually vigilant that morning. Also
Speaker 4: Apparently, before the bombing, governor Frank Keating's brother, Mark, had been working on a novel about a terrorist bombing in Oklahoma City, stranger still. One of the characters in the novel was named Thomas McVeigh.
Speaker 2: But that's probably just a coincidence. McVeigh wrote a letter to his sister where he admitted to being a secret special forces operative and he complained to friends of the pain in his ass from an army implanted microchip, but that's crazy because if he didn't actually leave the army in 1991, there would be proof of that. McVeigh was not executed on 05/16/2001 as scheduled because
Speaker 0: The FBI had failed to turn over thousands of pages of evidence to McVeigh's defense attorneys.
Speaker 2: But the execution went ahead on June 11. In highly unusual and secret agreement, no autopsy was performed. One witness said he was still breathing, and the prison officials admitted his hearse was a decoy. Then the case was officially closed. And if you question any part of the story, you are a paranoid wingnut birther truther, tenth or prepper conspiracy loon who bring up any of these points ever again, ever.
This message has been brought to you by the friends of the FBI, ATF, DOJ, CIA, SBLC, MSN, and the US Army. And remember, ignorance is strength.