reSee.it - Related Post Feed

Saved - December 13, 2023 at 12:16 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The new indictment against Trump reveals a dark and depraved plan. During the 2020 elections, numerous events occurred simultaneously: George Floyd protests, COVID release, lockdowns, election rule changes, mail-in ballots, no voter ID, free speech destruction, and censorship. They broke every rule to ensure Biden's victory. But they fear Trump's potential in 2024. They orchestrated January 6th, framing it as an insurrection. Now, they aim to charge Trump and disqualify him from future presidential runs using the 14th Amendment. This plan is cravenly evil.

@bennyjohnson - Benny Johnson

This is what is so duplicitous about this new indictment against Trump— this is what makes it so unbelievably dark and depraved: It was ALL a set up. So many things were hitting all at once during the 2020 elections: -George Floyd protests -release of COVID from China -COVID lockdowns -changing of all election rules -mail in ballots -ballot dumps -no voter ID -destruction of free speech -online “misinformation” censorship -Hunter Biden laptop censorship They were able to break EVERY SINGLE RULE in the book to drag Joe Biden across the finish line while he sat in his basement like a muppet. But they know they can’t do it again. Fool me once, shame on me. Fool me twice— the American people won’t let it happen. Donald Trump won 75 million LEGAL votes in 2020 and they are terrified he will do it again in 2024. So they have to do everything in their power to make sure he can’t. They orchestrated January 6th with undercover agents dressed as Trump supporters encouraging people to trespass into the Capitol. The crowd was FILLED with federal agents. The goal was to get people INSIDE the building. The Capitol Police Chief begged Nancy Pelosi to send the National Guard. 71 mins passed by and Nancy Pelosi REFUSED to answer calls for back up. The breach happened at the Capitol BEFORE Trump was even finished speaking. And then they framed the whole event as an “insurrection”. So now, they can charge Donald Trump for “insurrection” and use the 14th Amendment to disqualify him from ever running for president again. Do you understand now? Do you see how cravenly evil the plan has been all along?

Saved - August 2, 2023 at 9:41 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Special Counsel Jack Smith's recent indictments include Donald Trump, accusing him of unlawfully discounting legitimate votes. Smith's references could be to various individuals and groups who have discounted election results in the past. These include Stacy Abrams, who claimed to be the real governor of Georgia, Jimmy Carter, who attributed Trump's win to Russian interference, Hillary Clinton, who deemed Trump illegitimate, the Hollywood crowd who urged electors to vote against their states' popular vote, and Democratic members who tried to overturn the certified vote in Ohio. Smith's remarks may also allude to Molly Ball's Time essay, which detailed a 2020 cabal involving Democrats, Silicon Valley, and corporatists. This alliance aimed to change voting laws, control news censorship, influence street protests, and manipulate the work of state precinct workers, all with a budget of half a billion dollars.

@VDHanson - Victor Davis Hanson

Special Counsel Jack Smith added new indictments against Donald Trump, among them conspiratorially “unlawfully discounting  legitimate votes.” Was Smith here referencing Stacy Abrams who for years claimed she was the real governor of Georgia, barnstorming the country to overturn the vote count? Or maybe Smith referred to ex-president Jimmy Carter? He “discounted” the 2016 vote by claiming Trump won only due to the “Russians”? Or did Smith mean Hillary Clinton who discounted Trump as an “illegitimate” president, prompting her to join the “Resistance” against an elected president? Or maybe Smith meant the Hollywood crowd who cut commercials after the 2016 election, begging viewers to pressure the electors to refuse their constitutional duties to honor their states’ popular vote, and instead in insurrectionary fashion vote for Hillary Clinton? Or was Smith thinking of the 32 Democratic House members and Sen. Barbara Boxer in January 2005 who tried to toss out the legally certified vote in Ohio to swing the election to John Kerry? Or maybe Smith was referencing Molly Ball’s 2021 Time essay? She bragged of the 2020 “cabal” and “conspiracy” hatched by Democrats, Silicon Valley, and corporatists to spend half-a-billion  dollars to change state voting laws, censor the news, modulate the 2020 street protests, and absorb the work of state precinct workers?

Saved - November 29, 2023 at 4:23 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The fear of Trump's revenge and weaponization of bureaucracies is directly proportional to Biden's decline and family corruption. The Left's hypocrisy is evident in their attempts to wreck Trump's administration, suppress evidence, and politicize institutions. From the FBI to the IRS, Obama-Biden's legacy paved the way for partisan operations. The media conveniently forgets the Logan Act farce, calls for military coups, and violent fantasies against Trump. The truth is, they fear Trump would do exactly what they would do in his place, and that horrifies them.

@VDHanson - Victor Davis Hanson

Don’t Do Unto Others What We Would Have Done to Them? Once more, it gets even creepier how the projectionist Left is daily still shrieking about impending Trump “revenge” and “rage”, or about Trump’s purported enemies lists to come, or about his planned weaponization of the bureaucracies. The fear is in direct proportion to Biden cognitive decline, sinking polls, and walls-are-closing-in family corruption. Should we laugh or cry about the transparent hypocrisy? After all, who tried to wreck an administration with a 22-month-long Russian “collusion” fraud, suppressed a laptop with the lie it was Russian “disinformation”, or impeached a president for a phone call correctly identifying the Biden family’s operation in Ukraine as utterly corrupt and at the expense of U.S. interests? Do we recall that the Obama-Biden nexus—from 2009-17, and from 2021 until now—cemented the reputation of FBI as a partisan operation, rebooted the Pentagon as an agent of woke change ferreting out “white rage” and “white privilege”, reinvented the DOJ as a Biden family protection service, politicized the CIA so that it, along with the FBI, interfered in the 2016 and 2020 elections, and warped the IRS by suppressing evidence of Biden family tax fraud? What Lois Lerner, Eric Holder (self-identified as Obama’s “wingman”), and Loretta Lynch left undone was taken up by Merrick Garland. Does the New York Times, or Joe Scarborough or any of these strange pundits raging about Trump rage to come remember how the “Logan Act” farce was used to destroy Michael Flynn? Or the Foreign Policy essay of Rosa Brooks, a former Obama-era Pentagon lawyer, about how to drive out Trump without waiting for the 2020 election, by either impeachment, the 25thAmendment—or a military coup? How about the “kill Trump” porn that saw celebrities, actors, and academics envisioning decapitating, stabbing, shooting, exploding, or incinerating the orange man? How about Anonymous’s confessions about how fellow bureaucrats were trying to undermine and sabotage the operations of the Trump administration from within? Or the Pentagon’s retired 4-stars calling for Trump to be removed the “sooner the better”, or labeling him a Mussolini or Nazi-like figure? Who paid Twitter millions to censor the news of political opponents? Who paid foreign national Christopher Steele to peddle a fake dossier to destroy the 2016 Republican candidate? Do we remember Biden’s Phantom-of-the-Opera harangue about his “ultra-MAGA” and “semi-fascists” political enemies? Were not the twin pillars of Biden’s current foreign policy team, National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan, and Secretary of State Antony Blinken, once respectively knee-deep in the anti-Trump Alfa Bank-ping hoax and the “51 Intelligence Authorities” laptop scam? Again, the reason the media and politicians are terrified is that they are convinced Trump would do exactly what they would do in his place—and what they would do utterly suddenly horrifies them.

Saved - December 24, 2023 at 5:33 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The media claims that Trump attempted insurrection, but it was actually a riot due to failed security. Claims to save democracy by destroying it stem from mass psychosis after years of brainwashing. The Colorado Supreme Court ruling on Trump's ballot eligibility highlights the importance of protecting our democracy. The January 6 propaganda convinced half the country of a false narrative. The successful media propaganda led to increased support for government censorship.

@shellenberger - Michael Shellenberger

We must prevent people from voting for Trump because he attempted insurrection, the media say. But he didn't. January 6 was a riot from failed security, not a coup attempt. Claims that we must save democracy by destroying it stem from mass psychosis after years of brainwashing. https://t.co/Iv8Xjeuobn

@shellenberger - Michael Shellenberger

Hatred, Brainwashing, And Mass Psychosis Behind Democrats' War On Democracy We have to break the hypnotic trance destroying our country by @shellenberger You no doubt saw the news that the Colorado Supreme Court ruled that Trump cannot be on the ballot because he attempted insurrection on January 6. You might have paid little attention to it because you heard that the US Supreme Court would overrule the decision, and the holidays were coming up. But we should all pay attention, no matter your feelings about Trump, because what is at stake is nothing less than our democracy itself. Before saying why I think that is, it’s important for you to know something:

Video Transcript AI Summary
The Colorado Supreme Court ruled that Trump cannot be on the ballot due to his involvement in the January 6th insurrection. Some may have overlooked this news assuming the US Supreme Court would overturn the decision, especially with the holidays approaching. However, it is crucial for everyone, regardless of their political beliefs, to pay attention because our democracy is at stake.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hey, everyone. You probably saw the news that the Colorado Supreme Court recently ruled that Trump cannot be on the ballot because he attempted insurrection on January 6th. You might have paid little attention to it because you heard that the US Supreme Court would overrule the decision, and the holidays were coming up, and you've probably been busy. But we should all pay attention no matter your politics because what's at stake is nothing less than our democracy itself. Now before saying why I think this is, I wanna

@shellenberger - Michael Shellenberger

Please subscribe now to support our defense of free speech and democracy, and to watch the rest of the video! https://x.com/shellenberger/status/1738560965887881619?s=20

@shellenberger - Michael Shellenberger

I am sorry I did not speak up earlier against the January 6 propaganda. I thought the claims that it was a coup attempt were too ridiculous to be believed. I was wrong. Three years of relentless disinformation from state-controlled media convinced half the country that it was something it wasn't. Here's a thorough debunking of the nonsense by @ZaidJilani & @galexybrane that I wish I had published years earlier. Please share it with brainwashed friends and family and attempt to de-program them before they abolish our democracy. https://x.com/shellenberger/status/1737541647343526200?s=20

@shellenberger - Michael Shellenberger

Years Of Planning Behind Democrats’ Turn Against Democracy War on Trump shows that the most dangerous people are often those who consider themselves incapable of evil by @ZaidJilani & @galexybrane Donna Brazile (left), John Podesta (center), and Rosa Brooks (right) led a 2020…

@shellenberger - Michael Shellenberger

It’s shocking how well the media propaganda worked. Democrats went from 40% to 70% support for government censorship between 2018 and 2023. The last five years will be remembered as one of the most successful disinformation and brainwashing efforts in modern history. https://t.co/vbS4P1cWsg

Saved - December 28, 2023 at 12:33 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A lawsuit aiming to remove Trump from the ballot is allegedly backed by George Soros, according to the founder of the group behind the lawsuit. The group, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, recruited four Colorado Republicans who support Liz Cheney for President. The lawsuit is based on the events of January 6th, which the author argues did not result in any deaths or credible threats.

@AmericanHubener - Recall Katie Hobbs

🚨🚨🚨 FOLLOW THE MONEY Soros is behind lawsuit to disenfranchise 100 Million American Voters by Removing Trump from the Ballot Founder of group behind the lawsuit removing President Trump from the Colorado Ballot reveals their largest donor is George Soros. Melanie Sloan, left wing former counsel to Joe Biden and Chuck Schumer, founded Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington to act as the counterweight to Judicial Watch. They recruited four CO RINOs who think Liz Cheney should run for President to give standing. All of this, mind you, for “unarmed insurrection” on J6 that killed no one and made no credible threats to anyone.

Video Transcript AI Summary
We have various big donors, including the Open Society Institute, the Wallace Global Fund, the Arca Foundation, and the Carnegie Corporation. George Soros funds the Open Society Institute. However, these donors do not ask for anything in return. We maintain a positive relationship with them, and they appreciate our transparency.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Find a legal hook to push our issues hard. Speaker 1: Who are some of the biggest donors you have, and is there a restriction on how much money they can give you? Speaker 0: We don't have any restriction, but I would say our biggest donors are, for example, the, the Open Society Institute is a very big donor. Speaker 1: And whose whose organization is that? Speaker 0: Well, it's in it's a foundation, but it's well known to be, George Soros is the one who funds it. The Wallace Global Fund gives us money. The Arca Foundation gives us money. Those are some of the big foundations where we Carnegie Corporation gives us money. Speaker 1: You you do see a thread through the different sides in this where a big donor like George Soros will give to an awful lot of progressive organizations. Is that does he ever ask for anything directly? Speaker 0: No. He and I have met him, and he's never asked for anything at all. And, I meet with the program officer from, from the Open in Society Institute, and they're very happy with what we do. And they're very keen on transparency. We're part of their

@AmericanHubener - Recall Katie Hobbs

Insurrection my ass! When stealing elections isn’t insurrection but challenging stolen elections is, you know Media has gone full on Funny Farm George Orwell. 🤡 Schumer originally claimed that Trump committed erection fraud on J6! 😂 https://t.co/02J2vQmvXg

Video Transcript AI Summary
To claim that Trump is an insurrectionist, one must believe that the events of January 6th were a genuine attempt to take over the government. However, there has never been an armed insurrection in history. The Capitol Police were the ones armed that day, and it appears that there may have been deep state intervention involved. Despite this, Joe Biden still considers Trump to be an insurrectionist.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: On the legitimacy of the claim that Trump is an insurrectionist. For that to be true, you have to believe that January 6th was an insurrection, a genuine attempt at taking over government. Now remember that there has never been an armed insurrection in history. In history, no one's ever gone, we're taking over this country. Oh, how are you gonna do that? Oh, bloody well. By being persuasive. Have you not seen these hats? We've got 1 guy with makeup on and a buffalo costume. Now step aside, sir. Like the Capitol Police were the ones that were armed. Right? And certainly they've got a lot more funding since that day and I'm sure that that's wasn't the sole agenda at play, certainly, it seems more and more that there was deep state intervention, involved on that day and that event. Joe Biden, though, he thinks that Trump is an insurrectionist.
Saved - December 28, 2023 at 5:14 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Donald Trump's alleged promise to step down after the 2020 Election certification is highlighted. The author argues against claims of an insurrection, election overturning, incitement, or coup. They mention Trump's call for peace, which led to his social media ban. Biden's attempt to criminalize calling the election rigged is criticized. The author blames the FBI, Capitol Police, D.C. Mayor, and Pentagon for the Capitol security failure. They suggest an intentional riot by the federal government. The banning of evidence submission and Trump's ability to contest charges are criticized. The author accuses elites of caring only about power and interfering in elections. They claim that election rigging is now openly visible.

@kylenabecker - Kyle Becker

Did you know: Donald Trump said he would step down from office within hours of the 2020 Election being certified? There was no "insurrection." There was no order to "overturn" the election. There was no "incitement" of the pre-planned riot. There was no "coup." Trump called for peace within hours of the J6 riots. This caused him to be *banned* on all major social media platforms in a breathtaking act of Big Tech collusion that only served to underscore the president's narrative that the election was "rigged." Now, Biden wants to criminalize calling the 2020 election "rigged" while he and his cohorts openly rig the 2024 election. The dirty open secret is that the failure to secure the capitol was not Trump's failure; it was the failure of the FBI, Capitol Police, D.C. Mayor, and Pentagon, who all knew what was coming but conveniently failed to act in order to frame Trump and his supporters. But there is a more insidious truth suggested by videos of undercover police officers urging Trump supporters to "go to the capitol," as well as Capitol Police opening doors and removing barricades, and tear gas being wantonly dispersed into a restrained crowd of Trump supporters. The ugly truth is that the federal government wanted a riot in order to obstruct the election challenges. Now, Jack Smith wants to ban the submission of January 6 evidence that would exonerate Trump with a fair jury and a competent judge. This is in addition to his exculpation under the constitutional process of impeachment, which saw Donald Trump prevail despite dubious proceedings. Judge Chutkan and Jack Smith want to deny Trump the ability to contest these politically motivated charges with facts and evidence that go directly to the heart of the case. It is a further insult to the American people's intelligence proceeding from the January 6 cover-up committee's partisan vendetta to sully a political enemy, rather than seek to find the truth. But the truth is not being allowed to prevail against corrupted elites who care only about their illegitimate ends and nothing about the legitimate means of attaining power. There were legal election challenges, a Constitutionally authorized objection to state elections, and a staged riot that D.C. elites in the Uniparty knew was coming. The ultimate irony is that Jack Smith's purported case against Trump for 'election interference' is itself the most brazen form of election interference in U.S. history. America's elections are no longer being rigged in secret; they are being rigged out in the open for everyone to see.

Saved - January 3, 2024 at 12:50 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Maine Secretary of State Shenna Bellows removed Trump's name from the primary ballot, accusing him of "insurrection" without any legal basis. This sets a dangerous precedent for future elections. Hillary Clinton's involvement in the 2016 election, hiring a foreign national to create a dossier against Trump, raises questions about her own eligibility. Clinton and her associates worked to undermine Trump's presidency, even after the special counsel found no collusion. Clinton's claims of election theft and rigging set the stage for the 2020 election.

@VDHanson - Victor Davis Hanson

Who Are the Real Insurrectionaries? Part One Maine Secretary of State Shenna Bellows just ordered Trump’s name removed from the primary ballot in May. She claimed he is guilty in her view of “insurrection”—a crime Trump has never been charged with, much less convicted of. Her evidence, mostly gleaned from popular news accounts and video reports, would not stand up in a court of law. Bellows has no law degree. She was appointed by a majority vote of the Democratic-controlled Maine legislature, not through a popular ballot. Her legal expertise seems to be derived from years of political activism with the ACLU. We can see where the ultimate trajectory of this usurpation is going—once a single official decides to remove the leading primary and general election candidate of the opposition from the ballot by fiat. Tit-for-tat will likely follow and would unwind the republic. Take Bellows’ action and then apply it to any future candidacy of Hillary Clinton. And by these new rules she surely would fail to qualify to have her name on a state ballot. Remember, in 2016 Hillary Clinton illegally hired a foreign national (by law forbidden to work in presidential campaigns), Christopher Steele, to create a “dossier” of smears and fake-news accounts, aimed at destroying her presidential opponent Donald Trump by extra-legal means. Clinton hid her illicit payments to Steele behind the paywalls of the DNC, the Perkins-Coie law firm, and Fusion GPS. Her leftwing associates and partisans in the waning Obama administration, the DOJ, State Department, FBI, and CIA worked hard to brand the slurs as credible, as they variously passed them off and leaked to the media on the eve of the election. They and Democrats in congress later engineered the appointment of a special counsel, whose investigations consumed two years of the Trump administration’s term, before finding no “collusion”. Even three years after the election in 2019 and the special counsel’s findings, Clinton could still persist that Trump was an “illegitimate” president: “He knows he’s an illegitimate president”. She also declared that year that the 2016 election had been “stolen”: “I think it’s also critical to understand that, as I’ve been telling candidates who have come to see me, you can run the best campaign, you can even become the nominee, and you can have the election stolen from you”—de facto asserting the balloting was fraudulent. She was prepping the battlefield for 2020. So Clinton continued her denialism right up to the eve of the 2020 election, further claiming the 2016 election was rigged, “There was a widespread understanding that this election [in 2016] was not on the level.” To be continued…

Saved - January 3, 2024 at 12:50 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
In a series of posts, the author discusses various instances of election denialism and attempts to overturn the 2016 election. They highlight how Hillary Clinton, Jimmy Carter, and Jill Stein questioned the legitimacy of the election and claimed interference by Russia. The author also mentions the efforts by Democrats to persuade electors to vote against their states' popular vote. Despite a Supreme Court ruling declaring such actions illegal, the "resistance" against President Trump continued throughout his administration.

@VDHanson - Victor Davis Hanson

Who Are the Real Insurrectionaries? Part Two Hillary Clinton was joined in her later efforts to deny the legitimacy of the 2016 election by a large chorus of elected House members, and ex-president Jimmy Carter. Carter in 2019 echoed her charges: “And there's no doubt that the Russians did interfere in the election. And I think the interference although not yet quantified, if fully investigated would show that Trump didn't actually win the election in 2016. He lost the election, and he was put into office because the Russians interfered on his behalf.” Here we have an ex-president election denialist accusing the then president of being a veritable traitor as well as an election rigger. We do not recall any outrage at the time. During the 2016 electoral-college process, third-party Green candidate Jill Stein, de facto acting as a DNC surrogate, claimed the 2016 ballot count was illegitimate. She thus sued in Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin claiming the voting machines were rigged. (To my knowledge the companies involved like ExpressVote XL did not sue Stein, Dominion-Voting-Systems-style for $1 billion). Stein’s denialism arose mostly in reaction to the Clinton campaign that had loudly claimed “experts” found that Clinton tallies in those states did not meet her campaign’s pre-election expectations. At the same time, Democrats organized a media/publicity campaign— headed by about a dozen Hollywood “stars” appearing in nightly TV commercials —seeking to flip electors into “faithless” electors. In other words, they urged electors to violate their oaths, and not to reflect the uncontested majority votes of their states. Instead they were begged to vote for Hillary Clinton, who had lost their respective states’ popular vote. All this activism arose despite a July 2020 Supreme Court ruling clearly reaffirming the constitutionality of prior state laws that had declared faithless electors illegal. In other words, the Left organized a well-funded effort to overturn the 2016 election by creating faithless electors. They sought to deny the people’s majority votes in their states, and they continued despite a recent prior Supreme Court ruling that this ploy was patently illegal. Just four months after the Inauguration, Clinton boasted that she was part of the “Resistance”, a direct echo to the armed French armed effort —La Résistance—against the Nazi occupation. I suppose Hillary thought she was one of the heroic Democratic maquis and Trump of course Adolf Hitler. Leftwing fact-checkers bristle when such comparisons are made between the 2016 and 2020 election denialism. But the real difference between the two elections’ denialism was that the organized “resistance” to an “illegitimate” president who had “rigged” and “stolen” the 2016 vote continued throughout the Trump administration, often in illegal fashion. To be continued…

Saved - January 27, 2024 at 4:38 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Donald Trump stormed out of a New York courtroom after a defamation suit brought by E. Jean Carroll was settled against him for $83.3 million. The suit was largely subsidized by billionaire Reid Hoffman, a Democratic Party donor. This civil suit is a preview of four additional leftwing criminal prosecutions that Trump will face. The E. Jean Carroll case is particularly baffling, as there are inconsistencies in her story and the alleged assault happened decades ago. The passing of the Adult Survivors Act in New York allowed Carroll to refile her case. Trump will face leftwing prosecutors, judges, and juries, and must stay calm while campaigning against Biden. The legal system, along with leftwing politicians, is turning the election process into a farce. Trump may be the only hope to stop this mockery of American law and traditions.

@VDHanson - Victor Davis Hanson

83 million? Donald Trump in furor stormed out of a New York courtroom for a while, in the defamation suit brought by author and dating/boyfriend/sex-advice columnist E. Jean Carroll. It was just settled against Trump for $83.3 million! The Carroll suit was largely subsidized by Reid Hoffman the billionaire capitalist, and mega-donor to the Democratic Party and leftwing causes. The subtext of Trump’s rage, aside from the outrageous monetary size of the defamation ruling, is that he was facing—and angered—a leftwing claimant, a quite hostile leftwing judge, and a leftwing New York jury. The civil suit serves as a mere preview of four additional leftwing criminal prosecutions, leftwing judges, and leftwing juries to come—all on charges that would never had been filed if Trump either had not run for president or been a liberal progressive. Yet here we are. The E. Jean Carroll case is the most baffling of all five. She, the alleged victim, did not remember even the year in which the purported sexual assault took place, nearly three decades ago. Observers have pointed out dozens of inconsistencies in her story. It was never clear what were the preliminaries that supposedly (Trump denies meeting her) led both, allegedly, willingly to retreat together to a department store dressing room, where during normal business hours the alleged violence took place. Moreover, the sexual assault complaint came forward decades post facto—and only after Trump was running for and then president. Carroll eventually sued him for battery, but well after the statute of limitations had expired and thus the case seemed defunct. Her claims of defamation injuries arise from being fired from her advice column job at ELLE magazine. She claimed that Trump’s sharp denials and ad hominem retorts led to her career ruin. But the loss for anyone of a column at 76 does not seem such a rare occurrence, and the absence of a salaried job in one’s late seventies for four years does not seem to equate to a $83 million hit. And note the allegation that her dispute with Trump led to her firing was strongly denied by the very magazine that cut her loose. But then another strange thing happened. In 2022, a new law (“The Adult Survivors Act”) was passed in the New York legislature. It also post facto established a twelve-month window (beginning six months from the signing of bill) that permitted survivors of long ago alleged sexual assaults suddenly to sue the accused long-ago perpetrator—regardless of the previous statute of limitations. That unexpected opening suddenly gave Carroll’s prior unsuccessful efforts a rebirth. And she quickly refiled with the help of arch-Trump hating billionaire Hoffman. Yet the bill may have been introduced with Trump particularly in mind—given the legislator who introduced it, Brad Hoylman-Siga, was known as another Trump antagonist. More interestingly, he had earlier introduced and had passed another Trump-targeted bill. That “TRUST” act had empowered particular federal Congressional committees to have access to the New York State once sealed tax returns of high-ranking government officials—such as Trump. That bill’s generally agreed subtext was a green light for anti-Trump members of Congress to obtain legal access to Donald J. Trump's tax returns. So there is an eerie feeling that the New York legislature may have abruptly passed legislation that was aimed at the past conduct of Donald Trump but only after he entered the political arena. While these are not quite bills of attainder, there is something unsettling if they are post facto laws aimed at targeting the most famous and controversial man in America and the leading candidate for the presidency. In essence they were targeted statutes designed to make Trump’s prior legally unactionable behavior suddenly quite legally actionable. Trump will be subject to such special treatment all summer and fall. Prosecutors Bragg, James, Smith, and Willis will synchronize their court business for maximum effect. Trump again will face leftwing prosecutors, judges, and juries on charges that are politically driven, involving alleged behavior that is either usually not criminalized or not to the same degree as Trump’s case. (Do we remember the nearly $375,000 federal fine belatedly leveled at an exempt Obama but only five years after his 2008 illegal garnering of, and not reporting, foreign campaign contributions?) The stakes are higher each day as Trump closes in on the nomination and thus becomes the hope of half the country to end the Biden madness. Somehow Trump will have to stay calm, give no opening to his legion of hostile prosecutors, while conducting a nonstop campaign against Biden (and for a while Hayley), and while fighting to keep his name on various state ballots. So what we are witnessing is not even the extralegal efforts of Steele/Fusion GPS, Perkins Coie/DNC/Hillary Clinton in 2016, or the 2020 “Russian disinformation” ruse/change the voting laws/infuse half a billion dollars to absorb the work of the registrar machinations against Trump. We are way beyond all that. The legal system itself, hand-in-glove with leftwing politicos (compare campaign boasts of James and Willis, or prosecutorial visits to the January 6 committee and the White House) is turning the process of balloting and elections into an embarrassing farce. Still, Trump will have to soldier on. He must stay controlled amid the tsunamis, not play into the hands of his accusers, and remember that he may soon be the only eleventh-hour hope to stop this mockery of American law, customs and traditions.

Saved - March 4, 2024 at 5:35 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The series of posts highlights various court cases and testimonies related to the 2024 Trump election. The author points out inconsistencies and contradictions in testimonies, misuse of laws, and biased prosecution against Trump. The author believes that the Left fears and detests Trump, and is willing to destroy the American legal system to prevent him from becoming president again.

@VDHanson - Victor Davis Hanson

How To Destroy the American Legal System By either listening to testimonies or reading transcripts of the various 2024 Trump election-related court cases and testimonies, what we are left with is an epidemic of lies. 1) Hunter Biden’s current testimonies are contradicted by his own text messages, bank records, phone records, and testimonies of some of his associates. Anytime he is trapped in inconsistencies, he falls back on his addiction. Translated, that means we are sometimes supposed to believe he is a Yale-trained lawyer, experienced corporate grandee, and skilled negotiator, and thus carefully avoided involving his father in the family’s various schemes. And then again, sometimes when the evidence is damning and overwhelming, he simply cannot remember, or claims he was addled at the time in question due to his medical “addiction”. 2) In the Georgia Trump case, lawyers Terence Bradley, Nathan Wade, and Prosecutor Fani Willis all testified under oath to events that are contradicted by either prior other witness testimonies, or their own previous statements, or electronic phone records, and thus, to square the record, either have claimed amnesia, ignorance, or larger racist forces at work. Two of the three are leading the effort to indict a former president and current leading candidate for the presidency on a racketeering charge never before used in a Georgia election interference case, and to be tried by prosecutors who have either zero experience in felony criminal cases or no experience in racketeering cases or both. 3) Letitia James, the New York Attorney General, ran for office on promises to use her office to go after Donald Trump. She used an obscure consumer fraud law to claim Trump overvalued assets to obtain a loan that was paid back with interest and on time to a bank that audited his financial statement prior to the loan and had zero complaints about its profitable loan after it was paid off. Trump now is fined $355 million for a crime that has no victim, and has lost control of his New York businesses to a court-appointed judge. No one in New York history has ever been tried under this statute for allegedly exaggerating assets to get a loan that was paid back and over which the lending agency had no complaints. 4) Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg also boasted in his campaign for office he would go after Donald Trump. He is trying Trump on multiple felonies in a state court surrounding a supposed campaign finance violation over a nondisclosure agreement that the proper federal attorneys earlier felt did not merit prosecution. 5) Special Prosecutor Jack Smith is trying Trump for removing classified files to his estate at Mar-a-Lago. Note that twin special prosecutor Robert Hur found that President Biden also removed classified files to more and less secure residences for far longer (over 30 years) but as a senator and Vice President without Trump’s statutory presidential authority to declassify such documents. Biden admitted in 2017 he possessed such classified files and yet knowingly waited years to notify authorities. He did so only on the expectation that prosecutor Smith would soon indict Trump for the same alleged crime. Smith is also trying Trump on “insurrectionary” conduct despite Trump never having been charged in the prior three years by any federal or state authority for such an offense. 6) E. Jean Carrol (won $83.3 million in a “defamation” civil suit against Trump) won her case despite: 1) having no idea what year the alleged sexual assault took place some 30 years ago; 2) claiming she remembered the assault by the designer dress she wore that did not exist at the time; 3) advancing a narrative of events nearly identical to an episode of Law and Order that aired in 2012; 4) tweeting roughly two decades later that her supposed assailant’s TV show The Apprentice was one of her favorites; 5) her ELLE editor denying Carroll was fired from the magazine due to the Carroll-Trump dispute; 6) creating an app about how to break up couples through various machinations; 7) refiling her case beyond the statute of limitations, but only once a leftwing New York legislator strangely passed a bill allowing claimants of sexual abuse to have a one time, one year window to refile beyond the statute of limitations. 7) Blue or purple states such as Colorado, Illinois, and Maine are currently all attempting to remove Donald Trump from their presidential ballots on allegations of insurrectionary activity despite the fact he has never been convicted of any such charge and there is no precedent for such presidential disqualification. 8) Note the following: All the prosecutors, and litigants are either Democratic partisans or liberals. The trials have and will take place largely in Atlanta, New York, or Washington among leftwing prosecutors, judges, and jury pools. The majority of the charges and suits—the various states’ misuse of 14th Amendment, Bragg’s bootstrapping a state indictment onto a federal charge, James’s contortion of using a consumer fraud law to try Trump for a crime without a victim, Willis’s misuse of a racketeering statute to concoct an election interference charge, Carroll refiling once a leftwing jurist passed a special law that allowed her to do so postfacto, Smith’s effort to indict a president for insurrection and removing classified files—have either never been used before in these ways, or are in the wrong jurisdiction, or could equally apply to Democratic targets such as Joe Biden (found culpable by a special counsel but exempt by cognitive disability, named in various testimonies and texts as recipient of illicit foreign payments, accused of prior sexual assault), Hillary Clinton (fined for campaign finance violations), or Barack Obama (fined for campaign finance violations). So what is the reason for all this lying, these legal contortions, and egregious prosecutor and judicial misbehavior? Five simple facts alone: 1) The Left both fears and detests Donald Trump. 2) Donald Trump chose to run for the presidency in 2024. 3) Donald Trump is not a man of the Left. 4) Donald Trump is currently ahead of Joe Biden in both national polls and in the majority of swing state polls. 5) The Left feels barring Trump from the presidency is worth destroying 235 years of American jurisprudence.

Saved - March 21, 2024 at 7:23 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Democrats are accused of various actions against Trump, including spying, sabotage, impeachment, and targeting his supporters. The author questions their claim to save democracy through voting.

@jason_meister - Jason D. Meister 🇺🇸

Democrats illegally spied on Trump’s campaign, sabotaged his administration, undermined his presidency, banned him from social media, impeached him twice, arrested him four times, indicted him four times, charged him 91 times, jailed his supporters, raided his private residence, tried to remove him from ballots, and are attempting to bankrupt him through unconstitutional lawfare. And they tell you the only way to save democracy is to vote for them.

Saved - May 5, 2024 at 8:05 PM

@WesternLensman - Western Lensman

FLASHBACK to the time when Hollywood openly exhorted Republican electors to overturn the 2016 Presidential election results and Donald Trump’s victory. They called on electors to change their votes, defy the will of the people, and install Hillary Clinton into office instead. https://t.co/9f89MCCiVw

Video Transcript AI Summary
The message urges Republican members of the electoral college to vote their conscience on December 19th to prevent an unfit candidate like Donald Trump from becoming president. They emphasize the importance of selecting a qualified candidate who is especially competent to serve as president. By doing so, they can give the House of Representatives the option to choose a better candidate. The message expresses support and solidarity with all citizens of the United States and calls on the electors to make history by standing up for the American people.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Republican members of the electoral college, this message is for you. As you know, our founding fathers built the electoral college to safeguard the American people from the dangers of a demagogue and to ensure that the presidency only goes to someone who is to an eminent degree endowed with the requisite qualifications. Speaker 1: An eminent degree. Someone who is highly qualified for the job. Speaker 2: The electoral college was created specifically to prevent an unfit candidate from becoming president. There are 538 members of the electoral college. You And just 36 other conscientious Republican electors can make a difference Speaker 3: by voting your conscience on December 19th. Speaker 2: And thereby shaping the future of our nation. Speaker 3: I'm not asking you to vote for Hillary Clinton. Speaker 2: I'm not asking you to vote for Hillary Clinton. Speaker 0: I'm not asking you to vote for Hillary Clinton. Speaker 4: As you know, the constitution gives electors the right to vote for any eligible person. Speaker 0: Any eligible person, no matter which party they belong to. Speaker 1: But it should certainly be someone you consider especially competent Speaker 2: Especially competent to serve as president of the United States of America. Speaker 5: By voting your conscience, you and other brave Republican electors can give the House of Representatives the option to select a qualified candidate for the presidency. Speaker 2: I stand with you. Speaker 0: I stand with you. I stand with you. Speaker 2: I stand with you in support and solidarity with conservatives, independents, and liberals. Speaker 1: And all citizens of the United States. Speaker 0: The American people trust that your voice speaks for us all. Speaker 3: And that you you will make yourself heard through the constitutional responsibility granted to you by Alexander Hamilton himself. Speaker 4: What is evident is that Donald Trump lacks more than the qualifications to be president. Speaker 1: He lacks the necessary stability. Speaker 2: And clearly the respect for the constitution of our great nation. You have position Speaker 3: The authority and the opportunity Speaker 0: to go down in the books as an American hero Speaker 5: who changed the course of history. Speaker 4: And you have my respect You have my respect You have my respect Speaker 0: For your patriotism. And service to the American people. Unite for America.
Saved - May 30, 2024 at 12:05 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
My prediction for the Trump trial is that he will be convicted due to a biased jury and a radical leftist judge, despite being innocent. Democrats will use his conviction to campaign against him, but he won't go to prison right away. Democrats may try to cheat in the election to prevent Trump from winning, but if he does win, he may be sent to prison. This could lead to political violence, which the left wants. The future looks grim with hidden terrorists, sympathizers of genocidal terrorists, drug cartels, Marxist influence in institutions, a fragile financial system, and a divided public conditioned to hate certain groups. Trump's conviction plays a role in the left's plot for revolution.

@Liz_Wheeler - Liz Wheeler

I generally avoid predictions… But here’s my prediction of what will happen in this Trump trial… Trump will be convicted. This is due to a biased jury & radical leftist judge. In reality he’s innocent, which is obvious from the facts of the case. But… nonetheless, he’ll be convicted. Trump will then be the “convicted felon” that Democrats want for campaign ads. Will Trump go to prison? Not right away. The Democrats will use the “convicted felon” “criminal” “facing prison time” language in the lead up to the election, but they won’t dare send him to prison before Election Day because it would energize Trump’s base ten times more than the epic Trump mugshot. The Democrats will try to cheat (again) & rig the election (again), to prevent Trump from getting to the White House. They’ll probably be successful in their cheating, due to the fact that Republicans have done nothing to counter the Democrat electioneering of 2020. Subsequently, if Joe Biden “wins” the election, Trump most likely won’t go to prison because Democrats will be wide-eyed innocent liars when they claim “We don’t want it to appear that we’re targeting political enemies.” But, if Trump wins because Republican voter turnout is so enormous it overcomes Democrat cheating, then Trump will be sent to prison. When? When the radical leftist Marxist Democrats who hate our country—and us—are ready for revolution. Because, if Trump is sent to prison—even as POTUS—it will spawn political violence. The left knows this and it’s what they want. The Democrats will try to blame Trump supporters for the violence. But ultimately remember, it’s NOT conservatives who want violence. It’s the bloodthirsty communist left who want a “civil war.” They want unrest, riots, anarchy & violence because it will allow them to usurp our rights in the name of “safety” and “democracy” & to overthrow our system of republican government and instead impose the tyranny they admit they want. 2025 isn’t going to be pretty. We have Islamist terrorists hidden in our cities. We have sympathizers of genocidal terrorists marching on our college campuses (and in Congress!). We have drug cartels operating in all 50 states whose business is the killing of our citizens with fentanyl. Our institutions—from healthcare to education—are captured by Marxists. Our financial system has been primed to be weaponized against us with ESG. The value of our dollar is so fragile thanks to deliberate overspending by Biden that all of our wealth & prosperity is hanging by a thread. And one half of the American public—who probably hate being called American—has been conditioned to hate anyone who is white, Christian, conservative, or believes in free speech. This hateful mob have proved themselves willing to burn businesses, assault law enforcement, target Trump supporters, persecute Christians, censor conservatives, and establish anarchy at the slightest emotional impetus. This brainwashed mob now just awaits word from the Democrats to unleash violence against us—again. And this time, as recorded conversations from inside radical orgs have shown, the violence they plan will be worse than the Summer of Rage 2020. Trump’s impending, bogus conviction is a key part of this plot. Nothing but extreme, repeated wrong deliberately inflicted by the left on the right all but ensures that some righteously angry but imprudent idiot acts out in violence if Trump is sent to prison, thereby setting the stage for the revolution the left wants.

Saved - June 2, 2024 at 9:59 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The posts suggest that there is a coordinated effort to remove President Trump from state ballots in order to steal the 2024 election. The author believes that attacks on Alex Jones and InfoWars are part of this effort. The regime allegedly wants to provoke an insurrection to justify labeling Trump supporters as domestic terrorists and increase surveillance. The author argues that Trump's removal from state ballots, combined with the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact, will ensure a Biden victory. They warn of the impending downfall of America and urge peaceful resistance to keep Trump on the ballots and vote in large numbers. The author advises against falling into the trap of violence and emphasizes the importance of remaining calm.

@HealthRanger - HealthRanger

ANALYSIS: Why the cabal’s attacks on President #Trump and @RealAlexJones are coordinated to steal the 2024 election by removing Trump from state ballots It is no coincidence that the Alex Jones / InfoWars studios are threatened with imminent takedown and liquidation just days after Donald J. Trump was “convicted” in a sham show trial. Expect another major hit against pro-America conservatives in the coming days. These hits are all engineered to achieve the specific outcome of provoking enough outrage to spark a spontaneous insurrection attempt against a rogue regime that has clearly gone full totalitarian, presenting a clear and present danger to the future of this republic. This regime needs just enough of a provoked insurrection to augment it with their own false flag crisis actors, FBI front groups and planted materials that can later be described as terrorist ordnance by the complicit media, which has long since abandoned any faint memory of functioning as an independent press. Trump was chosen for the lawfare hit job because they desperately need a felony on his record for ballot disqualification reasons stated below, and Jones was targeted because his audience is younger and more prone to revolutionary-style thinking which, the government hopes, might translate into spontaneous insurrection activities that could be harnessed or counterfeited by the feds and then blamed on Jones. (MK Ultra top graduates are no doubt having the sheep dip goo cleaned off them right now, readying them for full activation.) The regime needs, in other words, to resurrect the J6 narrative on a much larger scale so they can declare all Trump supporters to be domestic terrorists, thereby legally justifying the recently-reauthorized FISA warrantless spying on the American people, which Speaker Johnson gleefully approved after a secret coercion meeting with the intelligence community. Since FISA spying requires no legitimate warrants or court approval, they can then use this to hoover up all the phone call audio data, texts, emails and meta data for all those deemed to be Trump supporters, gathering up a treasure trove of intel on not just the public at large, but also business leaders, members of Congress and even SCOTUS justices whom they desperately want to blackmail into resigning or recusing on key decisions. This blackmail material will also be leveraged against state lawmakers to achieve the Trump ballot ban, covered below. It’s not difficult to imagine a fed-initiated “extremism” event being concocted in the weeks ahead, followed by a barely-coherent Joe Biden lecturing America on why all Trump supporters are “dangerous extremists who must not be allowed to dictate the direction of our country by intimidating fellow Americans during election season” or similar pandering nonsense. To achieve this, Biden will insist, dozens of US states with Dem governors or blue legislatures must take action to remove Trump from the ballot entirely, justifying this by citing both Trump’s “34 felony convictions” and whatever acts of “insurrection violence” the deep state can conjure up and loosely blame on Trump supporters in the mean time. Trump’s very existence on the ballots will be loudly derided as a “threat to democracy,” where the term “democracy” doesn’t mean what you and I normally think it means. It actually means the institutions of government corruption, coercion and power. With Trump removed from the ballots in several key states – and write-ins discarded by law – it will be impossible for Trump to achieve 50% of the popular vote. The “official” popular vote (after Trump is removed from ballots across key US states) will go to Joe Biden. This will trigger the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact (NPVIC), which will have achieved the necessary 270 electoral vote threshold before election day as remaining states rush the legislation through between now and November. This means that those states’ electoral votes MUST be granted to the winner of the “popular vote,” which will of course be Pretender-In-Chief Joe Biden since Trump will be banned from so many state ballots. (This strategy was brought to my attention by Zach Vorhies @PerpetualManiac in an interview I conducted with him on Friday, which will be posted here in the next day or two.) In this way, Dems will once again steal the election and claim to have been democratically elected by the majority of the people, even though most of America now clearly supports Trump and absolutely despises what Biden and the Democrats have done to America (inflation, open borders, censorship, destruction of the rule of law, international wars, defunding police, etc.). Every four years, in other words, Dems come up with a whole new way to steal each election. While establishment Republicans are still fighting for “election integrity” to stop the kind of steal that took place in 2020, the Dems already have a whole new scheme being implemented with the NPVIC. Having Trump convicted of a felony – ANY felony – was a necessary step to push for removing him from ballots across just enough states to make sure he can’t possibly achieve 50% of the popular vote. This is why Bragg and the NY court system were willing to self-immolate and destroy the entire foundation of the rule of law in NY in order to get these felony charges into Trump’s rap sheet, timed so that he can’t possibly complete a successful appeal and reversal of the charges before blue states decide whether or not to remove Trump from their ballots. SCOTUS has already ruled that states can legislate their own rules for qualifications and disqualifying criteria for federal elections, so there’s no way that SCOTUS can intervene and stop this from happening. Besides, the blue states are all-in with the election cheating anyway, as they are also terrified of surrendering their political futures to the will of the voters. The end result is that the 2024 election is about to be stolen right under our noses, in broad daylight, by a criminal cabal of occupiers who are fully prepared to suspend the constitution, confiscate guns, cancel the First Amendment and lock up anyone who dares oppose them with peaceful protests. If you resist them, you are designated a “terrorist” and jailed. If you don’t resist them, they steal your elections in broad daylight and dare you to do something about it. They are no longer even hiding what they’re doing. They’re committing treason right out in the open and detonating the pillars of our society in a Building 7-style controlled demolition sequence of events that began on May 30th with Trump’s conviction. What you are about to witness next will be the complete takedown of our constitutional republic, followed by another stolen election, and that will be followed by the mass arrests of Trump supporters, nullification of the Second Amendment and government raids to shut down all conservative media. This is the true end game, and it will spell the complete downfall of America at just the chosen time when Biden and his State Dept. incompetent goons are working overtime to provoke Putin into nuking America so that C.O.G. emergencies can be invoked, elections can be entirely suspended, and anyone labeled “Russia-adjacent” can be arrested and held without trial. This would include, of course, anyone who has ever said that Putin is more cognitively capable than Biden… a fact that is obvious to anyone who doesn’t share Biden’s nauseating senility. The only way to stop all this from going down is to peacefully fight to keep Trump on all the state ballots, then turn out in historic numbers to vote as part of the Trump tidal wave on November 5th, even if you don’t like Trump or agree with all his policies. This is no longer an election choice between liberal vs. conservative policies; it’s an election choice between the total annihilation of our constitution republic vs. saving it from tyranny at the last possible moment while heaving proton torpedoes into the exhaust vents of the Death Star. Above all, do NOT get seduced into acting out any form of physical rage or violence, as you will be provoked many times between now and November. The deep states is playing all its cards now, trying to initiate a revolt, a civil war, or any shred of violence it can summon. If spontaneous violence can’t be found, the deep state players will whip it up themselves and BLAME it on conservatives. Each of us must be wise enough to recognize what’s happening, keep our cool and show up on November 5th in numbers so overwhelmingly huge that no amount of cheating, ballot stuffing or voting machine tweaks can stop the Trump tidal wave of victory. I will be featuring a multi-part interview with Zach Vorhies over the next few days, covering all this, across multiple video platforms, and I will post links here. Follow my channel here to stay informed. Much more analysis yet to come. Watch this channel for more announcements ahead.

Saved - June 19, 2024 at 7:12 AM

@EndWokeness - End Wokeness

Hollywood begged the Electoral College to OVERTURN the election in 2016 These people now call us a threat to "our democracy" The internet is forever https://t.co/Ki37o9UmAZ

Video Transcript AI Summary
The message is for Republican members of the electoral college, urging them to vote their conscience on December 19th. They are reminded of their constitutional right to choose a qualified candidate for president, emphasizing that Donald Trump lacks the necessary qualifications and stability. The electors are encouraged to be American heroes by shaping the future of the nation and standing united for America.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Republican members of the electoral college, this message is for you. As you know, our founding fathers built the electoral college to safeguard the American people from the dangers of a demagogue and to ensure that the presidency only goes to someone who is to an eminent degree endowed with the requisite qualifications. Speaker 1: An eminent degree. Someone who is highly qualified for the job. Speaker 0: The electoral college was created specifically to prevent an unfit candidate from becoming president. There are 538 members of electoral college. You Speaker 2: And just 36 other conscientious Republican electors can make a difference. Speaker 3: By voting your conscience on December 19th. Speaker 2: And thereby shaping the future of our nation. Speaker 3: I'm not asking you to vote for Hillary Clinton. I'm Speaker 2: I'm not asking you to vote for Hillary Clinton. I'm not asking you to vote for Hillary Clinton. As you know, the constitution gives electors the right to vote for any eligible person. Speaker 0: Any eligible person, no no matter which party they belong to. Speaker 1: But it should certainly be someone you consider especially competent. Speaker 2: Especially competent to serve as president of the United States of America. By voting your conscience, you and other brave Republican electors can give the House of Representatives the option to select a qualified candidate for the presidency. I stand with you. Speaker 0: I stand with you. I stand with you. I stand with you in support and solidarity with conservatives, independents, and liberals. Speaker 3: And all citizens of the United States. Speaker 2: The American people trust that your voice speaks for us all. Speaker 3: And that you you will make yourself heard through the constitutional responsibility granted to you by Alexander Hamilton himself. Speaker 2: What is evident is that Donald Trump lacks more than the qualifications to be president. Speaker 1: He lacks the necessary stability. Speaker 0: And clearly the respect for the constitution of our great nation. You have position The authority. And the opportunity to go down in the books as an American hero. Speaker 2: Who changed the course of history. And you have my respect. You have my respect. You have my respect. Speaker 3: For your patriotism. And service Speaker 0: to the American people. Unite for America.
Saved - July 23, 2024 at 2:22 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I question whether actions by U.S. intelligence agencies regarding the Russiagate narrative, the rigging of the Democratic primary elections, and the censorship of the Biden laptop constitute insurrections against democracy. I point out that the Democratic Party has seemingly celebrated these events, including the violent protests associated with BLM, which caused significant damage. Kamala Harris even supported bail funds for those involved in the riots, while Elizabeth Warren acknowledged the rigging of the 2016 primary. Despite this, many continue to lecture the public about protecting democracy.

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

Was it an insurrection against democracy when U.S. intelligence agencies promoted the Russiagate hoax? Was it an insurrection against democracy when the Democrats rigged their primary election? Was it an insurrection against democracy when 51 intelligence officials lied about the Blden laptop to get it censored and influence the election? Was it an insurrection against democracy when BLM burned down cities for weeks, including violent attacks on the Secret Service as they attempted to burn down the White House? The Democrat Party celebrated all these insurrections against democracy. Kamala Harris promoted funds to bail out BLM rioters who caused $1 to $2 billion in damage while burning, looting, and rioting in American cities for weeks. Kamala Harris' bail fund even freed George Howard, who shot and killed a man shortly after his release. Elizabeth Warren stated on national TV that Democrats rigged their primary election in 2016. The Democrat Party rigged their primary election again in 2024. Yet, the same people go on TV every day and lecture America about attacks against our democracy.

Saved - August 3, 2024 at 8:11 AM

@mrddmia - 🇺🇸 Mike Davis 🇺🇸

Biden attempted to bankrupt Trump, throw him in prison for life, throw Trump off the ballot, and almost got Trump killed. When Biden failed, Democrat insiders overturned the will of 14 million Democrat primary voters and installed Kamala Harris in a bloodless coup. “Democracy!” https://t.co/nbZ5olptNi

Saved - December 27, 2024 at 1:03 PM

@DC_Draino - DC_Draino

Trump won the popular vote, every swing state, and the electoral college The Hill is now plotting an insurrection to stop him Disbar the authors of this article and send the FBI into their offices That’s how it works right? https://t.co/Oo5JqYbWRx

Saved - December 30, 2024 at 9:42 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I will keep saying it: there was collusion and unprecedented election interference. The U.S. Communist Democrat Party worked with the Chinese Communist Party. If you think I'm a conspiracy theorist, that's fine, but you just don't understand the depths of the left's pure evil.

@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

I will say say this again and I will keep on saying it. There was a collusion. There was an election interference the likes of which humanity has never seen before, The U.S. Communist Democrat Party colluded with the Chinese Communist Party. And if you think I am a conspiracy theorist, that’s perfectly alright. But I will say this, fuck you. You just don’t know what the left is capable of. PURE EVIL.

Video Transcript AI Summary
New evidence has emerged linking Dr. Anthony Fauci to a CIA cover-up regarding COVID-19. A whistleblower alleged that the CIA was paying individuals to suppress the lab leak theory. Additionally, a House committee investigating the origins of the pandemic revealed that Fauci was escorted into CIA headquarters without a record of entry and participated in influencing the agency's review. The committee is now demanding that the Department of Health and Human Services provide documents detailing Fauci's movements in and out of CIA-controlled sites during the pandemic.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Fox News alert. New evidence has just surfaced, tying doctor Anthony Fauci to the CIA's cover up of COVID 19. Last week, a whistleblower claimed the CIA was paying people off to bury the lab leak theory, and now this, from the house committee investigating the pandemic origins, quote, doctor Fauci was escorted into Central Intelligence Agency, CIA headquarters, without a record of entry and participated in the analysis to influence the agency's review. The committee is now ordering HHS to hand over documents detailing all of Fauci's movements during the pandemic in and out of CIA controlled sites.

@atensnut - Juanita Broaddrick

Bird flu is a scam. I repeat… Bird flu is a scam. Don’t fall for it!

Saved - March 1, 2025 at 11:30 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
You clowns are at it again, trying to deflect from your guy's embarrassing mistakes by lying about a favorite target. Just to clarify, I've never met or spoken to Zelenskyy or advised him. It's disappointing that you think it's in the U.S. interest to sell out Ukraine and appease Putin.

@AmbassadorRice - Susan Rice

You clowns are up to the same old tired crap. When your guy screws up and royally embarrasses himself and the U.S., you try to change the subject and lie about a favorite target to distract and deflect. For the record, I have never met Zelenskyy and never spoken to him. Ever. Or advised him or anybody around him. It’s a shame that you contend that it is in the U.S. national interest to sell out Ukraine and suck up to Putin.

@MZHemingway - Mollie

Yesterday, Susan Rice said of the Trump-Zelensky meeting, "There is no question this was a set up." She revealed full knowledge of the mineral agreement, complained that it didn't include "concrete" security agrees (meaning, apparently, commitment of US troops on the ground if conditions merit), and then mischaracterized Trump's behavior, counting on most Americans to not have watched what transpired over the entire hour in the Oval Office. You can look at this and dismiss it as typical Democrat talking points, but you could also view it as almost a confession, one that includes details about the current "Get Trump" effort. Yes, Trump won the popular vote against unbelievable odds, but if you think Team Obama is being any less involved in quiet insurrections than they were during the first Trump administration (Russia collusion, Ukraine impeachment, etc.), you're clueless. I'll remind you that Susan Rice was in the small Jan. 5, 2017 meeting in the WH with other key Russia collusion hoax perpetrators. Zelensky repeatedly declined opportunities to sign the deal in Kyiv and Munich, and requested the meeting at the White House. It later came out that Rice and Tony Blinken, Victoria Nuland, and Alexander Vindman may have been personally advising Zelensky to do this meeting in the way he did -- that they recommended him to be hostile and to try to goad Trump into blowing up. Even though he didn't, and even though Zelensky's actions horrified many normal Americans, the Obama team went on the airwaves to falsely characterize what happened. I think their goal was to have a wonderful performance by Zelensky, an angry Trump appearing to scuttle the deal, and the support of the neocon portion of the GOP to start applying pressure on Trump to have US Troop commitments as part of the "security guarantee." It was a set-up, in Susan Rice's interesting choice of words. Instead, Zelensky had one of the worst stage performances of his acting career, and Trump was statesmanlike (against all odds) throughout. Zelensky followed Team Obama's advice to be hostile to a tee, but it didn't land how they thought it would. Surprisingly, one of the most important aspects of it not working out might have been Lindsay Graham's reaction. Had he and other neocons thought Zelensky was being reasonable, Trump would be having to fight (even moreso) the neocon portion of the GOP in addition to Team Obama's dirty tricks. Even the "conservative" neocon pundits on TV last night were admitting Zelensky had royally messed up. As you can see from the hostility of the bureaucracy to any Republican oversight, no matter how reasonable or minor it may be, the entrenched bureaucracy and permanent DC apparatus is quite active. That goes quadruple for the deep state in the Intelligence Community. I'd expect more and more shenanigans and to be prepared so that you don't fall for the next information operation. The post-WWII architecture in Europe and the US needs this war to continue or be settled on "US troops on the ground" type guarantees, even though that's not what Americans want. Things will heat up here, and it's a very dangerous time.

Saved - May 4, 2025 at 3:55 PM

@StephenM - Stephen Miller

The Democrats appointed communist judges in a handful of America’s most liberal cities. Those unelected communist judges are now trying to rule over us all and invalidate the 2024 electoral landslide.

Saved - May 7, 2025 at 7:14 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The conversation began with a call for Harvard to be scrutinized. In response, it was suggested that Harvard should be investigated for its law school's ties to Protect Democracy, which allegedly played a role in legal actions against the Trump administration over the past four years.

@EDSecMcMahon - Secretary Linda McMahon

Dear @Harvard: https://t.co/XmMimXfkX0

@listen_2learn - The Researcher

@EDSecMcMahon Harvard needs to be investigated for their role in the lawfare against the Trump administration through their law school’s relationship with Protect Democracy who were also involved in all of the lawfare over the last four years including elections.

@listen_2learn - The Researcher

“Democracy and the Rule of Law Clinic” So Harvard law school students work for Protect Democracy, one of the lawfare nonprofits that works against the will of the 77M+ Americans that voted for Trump.

Saved - August 14, 2025 at 4:18 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Victor Davis Hanson critiques the modern Democrat Party, arguing they undermine democracy while claiming to defend it. He highlights their reliance on a narrative of "saving democracy" from Donald Trump, which he believes contradicts their actions. He cites gerrymandering as an example of their hypocrisy and outlines three major scandals aimed at Trump, including the Russia collusion hoax and the suppression of the Hunter Biden laptop story. Hanson asserts that Democrats have sabotaged democracy and now face the consequences of their actions, feeling powerless and frustrated.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

PAYBACK. Victor Davis Hanson just EXPOSED how the Left UNDERMINED democracy while pretending to defend it. He laid out three UNDENIABLE examples. Now they’re POWERLESS—standing atop a house of cards. Then came one of the most BRUTAL indictments of the modern Democrat Party: “You have been the most vicious and the most abject subverters of democracy, all for the short term gain of destroying Donald Trump.” 🧵 THREAD

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Victor Davis Hanson just held a mirror up to the modern Democrat Party the reflection wasn’t flattering. According to Hanson, their entire political strategy now hinges on a single claim: that they are “saving democracy” from Donald Trump. But peel back the rhetoric, and the reality looks very different. “The Democrats have a new narrative. The left in general does, that they are ‘saving democracy’ from Donald Trump, and that justifies almost any means necessary to achieve the end of destroying or preventing Donald Trump from governing effectively.” Hanson laid out in simple terms the glaring contradiction: “The problem with all of this is they are destroying democracy to destroy Donald Trump.” It’s not even a metaphor. It’s a direct inversion of what they claim to stand for. And to prove it, he walked through exactly how this mindset has played out in real-time.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The transcript features Speaker 0 presenting two central claims. "The Democrats have a new narrative, the left in general does, that they are saving democracy from Donald Trump, and that justifies almost any means necessary to achieve the end of destroying or preventing Donald Trump from governing effectively." "The problem with all of this is they are destroying democracy to destroy Donald Trump." The speaker frames these statements as a critique of perceived tactics in political discourse around Trump. No further context is provided in the transcript. The excerpt highlights a conflict over democratic norms and strategic considerations in U.S. politics.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The Democrats have a new narrative, the left in general does, that they are saving democracy from Donald Trump, and that justifies almost any means necessary to achieve the end of destroying or preventing Donald Trump from governing effectively. The problem with all of this is they are destroying democracy to destroy Donald Trump.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Take gerrymandering. Hanson pointed to it as a textbook example of the left projecting what they’ve already done onto their opponents. Now that Republicans are playing by the same rules, Democrats are screaming foul. But what’s good for the goose, is good for the gander. “One of the issues that they are agitating is the redistricting of congressional districts in Texas, in California now,” he said. “And the general problem that the left has is if you look at gerrymandering to make these jigsaw puzzle piece-like districts, the left is way ahead of the right.” He pointed out that in many states where Trump won 40–50% of the vote, Republican representation in Congress doesn’t come close to matching that. And he backed it up: “There’s been sophisticated studies of gerrymandering, and it boils down to the Republicans are short, some 6 to 10 seats in the House based on the proportion of the national vote they have received.” So why the outrage now? Because Democrats fear losing their edge. “The Democrats know that, but they’re angry about the Texas reapportionment and gerrymandering, and their attitude is we’ve already gerrymandered our states to the maximum. Don’t dare try to emulate us.” When Republicans do, suddenly it’s a threat to democracy. In response, Democrat blowhards like James Carville have doubled down on a new mantra: get tougher. But as Hanson explained, the Democrats are already there. “James Carville said that they have to get tougher. That’s the new mantra.” And yet, he argued, they’ve been anything but restrained. “Got to get tougher, got to get meaner. Cory Booker screams and yells and throws a fit about every three weeks in the Senate. Hakeem Jeffries picks up his baseball bat. There’s usually a video with the squad or representatives using the word ‘sh—’ or the F word, kind of pornographic.” “Jasmine Crockett periodically calls Donald Trump names that are—can’t be repeated on air. But you can see the anger.” He paused before making the point crystal clear: “They have been too tough.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses redistricting and gerrymandering in Texas and California, noting the left's advantage in drawing 'jigsaw puzzle like districts.' Studies indicate Republicans are short about six to ten seats in the House relative to their share of the national vote. Democrats know this but are angry about Texas reapportionment and gerrymandering, and their attitude is, 'we've already gerrymandered our states to the maximum. Don't dare try to emulate us.' James Carville said that they have to get tougher. 'That's the new mantra.' Cory Booker screams and yells in the Senate, Hakim Jeffries picks up his baseball bat. There's usually a video with the squad or representatives using the word SHIT or the F word, kind of pornographic. Jasmine Crockett periodically calls Donald Trump names that are can't be repeated on air. The anger persists, and the new idea is that they haven't been tough enough. They have been too tough.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What do I mean? One of the issues that they are, agitating is the redistricting of congressional districts in Texas, in California now. And the general problem the left has is if you look at gerrymandering to make these jigsaw puzzle piece like districts, the left is way ahead of the right. In other words, states that have proportions of 30 to 40 to 50% for Donald Trump do not have that level of representation in the Congress. And there's been sophisticated studies of gerrymandering and it boils down to the Republicans are short some six to 10 seats in the House based on the proportion of the national vote they have received. The Democrats know that, but they're angry about the Texas reapportionment and gerrymandering. And their attitude is, we've already gerrymandered our states to the maximum. Don't dare try to emulate us. James Carville said that they have to get tougher. That's the new mantra. Got to get tougher, got to get meaner. Cory Booker screams and yells and throws a fit about every three weeks in the Senate. Hakim Jeffries picks up his baseball bat. There's usually a video with the squad or representatives using the word SHIT or the F word, kind of pornographic. Jasmine Crockett periodically calls Donald Trump names that are can't be repeated on air. But you can see the anger and now the new idea is that they haven't been tough enough. They have been too tough.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Before we get to the next clip: if you’re not following me, you may be missing out on critical updates. Hit the bell 🔔 so you don’t miss the inconvenient truths the media hopes you’ll never see. → @VigilantFox

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

That set the stage for Hanson’s most serious charge. The three earth-shattering scandals Democrats have orchestrated to cripple Trump weren’t just aggressive…they were unprecedented. They make Watergate look like a tea party on the South Lawn. “There’s been three great scandals in the 21st century,” he said. “The first was the Russian collusion hoax that was prompted by Hillary Clinton and facilitated by the Obama administration on its way out, that almost destroyed the Trump campaign, sabotaged his transition, and ate up 22 months of his first two years.” He continued: “The second was the Biden, FBI and CIA—but especially the CIA and the intelligence agencies—got 51 people, former intelligence authorities, to LIE to the American people on the eve of the second debate to affect the 2020 election, and claimed, falsely, that Donald Trump was lying about the laptop of Hunter Biden.” “That was a complete lie. It was Hunter’s laptop. We know, because the FBI had it in its possession and authenticated it.” And then came the third. “The great scandal,” Hanson said, “that the Democratic Party and the obsequious media knew that Joe Biden was non compos mentis, he was not cognitively able to fulfill the office of the presidency.” He described how they hid it from the public…until it became impossible to hide. “When he finally challenged Donald Trump to a debate and melted and before our very eyes, sort of like the Wicked Witch in The Wizard of Oz, he melted into a non-entity.” What an image. Maybe this could be used as a metaphor for the current state of the Democrat Party. Melting.

Video Transcript AI Summary
There's been three great scandals in the twenty first century. First, the Russian collusion hoax prompted by Hillary Clinton and facilitated by the Obama administration on its way out that almost destroyed the Trump campaign, sabotaged his transition, and ate up twenty two months of his first two years. Second, the Biden FBI, and CIA, but especially the CIA and the intelligence agencies, got 51 people, former intelligence authorities, to lie to the American people on the eve of the second debate to affect the two thousand twenty election and claimed falsely that Donald Trump was lying about the laptop of Biden Hunter Biden, that it was fake, that it was a Russian production and Donald Trump then was colluding again with the Russians. That was a complete lie. It was Hunter's laptop, we know because the FBI had it in his possessions and unauthenticated. And finally, the great scandal that the Democratic Party and the obsequious media knew that Joe Biden was non compost mentees. He was not cognitively cognitively able to fulfill the office of presidents, the presidency, and they kept that from the American people until they could no longer keep it when he finally challenged Donald Trump to a debate and melted before our very eyes, sort of like the Wicked Witch and The Wizard of Oz. He melted into a nonentity.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There's been three great scandals in the twenty first century. The first was the Russian collusion hoax that was prompted by Hillary Clinton and facilitated by the Obama administration on its way out that almost destroyed the Trump campaign, sabotaged his transition, and ate up twenty two months of his first two years. The second was the Biden FBI, and CIA, but especially the CIA and the intelligence agencies, got 51 people, former intelligence authorities, to lie to the American people on the eve of the second debate to affect the two thousand twenty election and claimed falsely that Donald Trump was lying about the laptop of Biden Hunter Biden, that it was fake, that it was a Russian production and Donald Trump then was colluding again with the Russians. That was a complete lie. It was Hunter's laptop, we know because the FBI had it in his possessions and unauthenticated. And finally, the great scandal that the Democratic Party and the obsequious media knew that Joe Biden was non compost mentees. He was not cognitively cognitively able to fulfill the office of presidents, the presidency, and they kept that from the American people until they could no longer keep it when he finally challenged Donald Trump to a debate and melted before our very eyes, sort of like the Wicked Witch and The Wizard of Oz. He melted into a nonentity.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Hanson broadened the lens. He argued that when you line up the pattern of actions, from media lies to lawfare to ballot bans, one thing becomes clear: the Democrats aren’t protecting democracy. They’ve been gutting it. “If you look at the Democrats, they have staged three great scandals to try to destroy the Trump administration and by extension, democracy.” Then he listed more. Each transgression against democracy, stabbing like a dagger. “They impeached Donald Trump twice. No one’s ever done that.” “They tried him as a private citizen. Nobody’s ever done that.” “They raided his home in Mar-a-Lago. That is a terrible precedent for an ex-president. No one has ever done that.” “They tried to get him off the ballot in 25 states. No one had ever done that.” “There were two assassination attempts during the campaign that had never happened before.” “They tried to debunk him and make it impossible for Donald Trump to write a check, whether from Morgan Stanley or Bank of America or any bank.” So when Carville says Democrats are now going to get tough? They already did. Hanson says it’s TOTAL gaslighting. “When James Carville says, we’re going to get tough, we’re going to get really tough, and we’re going to let in Puerto Rico and Washington, DC to get four senators, or we might have to pack the court to 13 justices, I’m thinking, well, you always were going to do that.” He went even further. “If you had not lost the House and Senate during the Biden administration, had you had a normal president that was in control of his mental and physical abilities, then you would have not only packed the court and not only, as you promised, let in two states, but in addition, you would have gotten rid of the Electoral College by the hook and crook of the National Voter Compact.” “And more importantly, you would have abolished the Senate.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker argues that Democrats launched “stage three great scandals” to destroy the Trump administration and democracy, listing: “They impeached Donald Trump twice. No one's ever done that.” “They raided his home in Mar A Lago.” “They tried to get him off the ballot in 25 states.” “There were two assassination attempts during the campaign.” “They tried to debank him and make it impossible for Donald Trump to write a check, whether from Morgan Stanley or Bank of America or any bank.” He cites James Carville's claim: “we're gonna get tough, we're gonna get really tough and we're gonna let in Puerto Rico and Washington DC to get four senators or we might have to pack the court to 13.” “You were going to pack to 15.” He adds that “if you had not lost the House and Senate during the Biden administration… you would have abolished the senate.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So my point is, if you look at the Democrats, they have stage three great scandals to try to destroy the Trump administration, and by extension, democracy. They impeached Donald Trump twice. No one's ever done that. They tried him as a private citizen. Nobody's ever done that. They raided his home in Mar A Lago. That is a terrible president for an ex president president. No one has ever done that. They tried to get him off the ballot in 25 states. No one had ever done that. There were two assassination attempts during the campaign. That had never happened before. They tried to debank him and make it impossible for Donald Trump to write a check, whether from Morgan Stanley or Bank of America or any bank. So my point is this, when James Carville says we're gonna get tough, we're gonna get really tough and we're gonna let in Puerto Rico and Washington DC to get four senators or we might have to pack the court to 13. I Justice, I'm thinking, well you always were going to do that. You were going to pack to 15. In fact, if you had not lost the House and Senate during the Biden administration, had you had a normal president that was in control of his mental and physical abilities, then you would have not only packed the court and not only, as you promised, let in two states, but in addition you would have gotten rid of the electoral college by the hook and cook of the National Voter Compact, and more importantly, you would have abolished the senate.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

That’s why the Democrats’ narrative is collapsing under its own weight. “So the problem, James Carville, and Democrats, is that you have sabotaged democracy, and you’ve done things that no one has ever done before to an oppositional candidate, presidential transition, and president.” Now, the consequences are finally catching up with them…not because they were too soft, but because they pushed too far and failed. They are both powerless and rudderless, lost at sea. “You’re furious because you’re on the 40% side of every issue that’s dear to you, from the trans issue to the border issue to the crime issue, to the Green New Deal issue, to foreign policy, and you have no political power.” “You don’t have the White House, you don’t have the Congress, you don’t have the Supreme Court.” “And your institutional power—the media, academia, the foundation—they are under assault.” So now, he said, they’re spinning a new story to distract from what’s really happening. “You’ve created this completely false narrative that you have to get tough… In fact, the opposite is true, everybody.” Then he delivered the final blow with the grace and eloquence only Hanson could bring. It was knockout punch after knockout punch. It cut directly to the core of Democrat Party....bare for the world to see. “You have been the most vicious and the most abject subverters of democracy all for the short term gain of destroying Donald Trump.” “And now that’s boomeranging upon you, and you don’t like to see it happen to you, what you tried to do to Donald Trump.” “There’s a whole vocabulary cross-culturally for what is happening to you now. It’s called payback is a ‘blank’, karma, boomerang, do unto others as you should do unto you, only eye for an eye, tooth for a tooth.” “But this is called retribution and it’s fully earned for what you’ve done to democracy, as long as it’s legal and it’s necessary.” “You’re angry because you’re impotent, and you created false narratives that Donald Trump is doing what you have actually done.” “And what is that? Destroying democracy.” Wow, that was BRUTAL, but accurate.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker accuses James Carville and Democrats of sabotaging democracy, "you have sabotaged democracy, and you've done things that no one has ever done before to an oppositional candidate, transition presidential transition, and president." They say Democrats are furious because they're "on the 40% side of every issue"—trans, border, crime, Green New Deal, foreign policy—and have "no political power" with "no White House" or Congress or Supreme Court, while "your institutional power, the media, academia, the foundation, they are under assault." The speaker contends they've created a "completely false narrative" that you have to get tough; "the opposite is true"—"the most vicious and the most abject subverters of democracy" for the short-term gain of destroying Donald Trump. Now that's "payback" / "karma boomerang" / "retribution," fully earned for what you've done to democracy as long as it's legal and it's necessary. What is that? Destroying democracy.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So the problem, James Carville and Democrats, is that you have sabotaged democracy, and you've done things that no one has ever done before to an oppositional candidate, transition presidential transition, and president. And now you're furious because you're on the 40% side of every issue that's dear to you, from the trans issue to the border issue to the crime issue to the Green New Deal issue to foreign policy. And you have no political power. You don't have the White House. You don't have the Congress. You don't have the Supreme Court. And your institutional power, the media, academia, the foundation, they are under assault. And so you're frustrated and you've created this completely false narrative that you have to get tough and you've been very Marcus of Queensbury rules like. In fact, the opposite is true to everybody. You have been the most vicious and the most abject subverters of democracy all for the short term gain of destroying Donald Trump. And now that's booming booming boomeranging upon you and you don't like to see it happen to you what you tried to do to Donald Trump. And there's a whole vocabulary cross culturally for what is happening to you now. It's call it call called payback is a blank karma boomerang do unto others, you should do unto you, only eye for an eye, tooth for tooth. But this is called retribution and it's fully earned for what you've done to democracy as long as it's legal and it's necessary. But you're angry because you're impotent and you created false narratives that Donald Trump is doing what you have actually done. What is that? Destroying democracy.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Watch the full episode of the @DailySignal here:

@DailySignal - The Daily Signal

VDH: Democrats Betray Democracy to Stop Trump The Left claims they’re “saving democracy” from Donald Trump—but their actions tell a different story. Democrats have pushed some of the most brazen political scandals in modern history—from the Russia collusion hoax, to burying the Hunter Biden laptop, to hiding President Biden’s cognitive decline—all in the name of stopping Trump. @VDHanson exposes how the Left has undermined democracy in the very process of claiming to defend it on today’s episode of “Victor Davis Hanson: In His Own Words.” “  The problem, James Carville and Democrats, is that you have sabotaged democracy. And you’ve done things that no one has ever done before to an oppositional candidate, presidential transition, and president. And now you’re furious because you’re on the 40% side of every issue that’s dear to you—from the trans issue to the border issue, to the crime issue, to the Green New Deal issue, to foreign policy. And you have no political power. You don’t have the White House, you don’t have the Congress, you don’t have the Supreme Court. And your institutional power—the media, academia, the foundation—they are under assault.” 👉Don’t miss out on Victor’s latest videos by subscribing to The Daily Signal today. You’ll be notified every time a new piece of content drops: https://www.youtube.com/dailysignal?sub_confirmation=1 👉If you can’t get enough of Victor Davis Hanson from The Daily Signal, subscribe to his official YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/@victordavishanson7273 👉He’s also the host of “The Victor Davis Hanson Show,” available wherever you prefer to watch or listen. Links to the show and exclusive content are available on his website: https://victorhanson.com (0:00) The New Narrative (0:22) The ‘Tougher’ Mantra (1:25) Gerrymandering and Redistricting (3:01) The Three Great Scandals (4:54) Unprecedented Actions Against Trump (6:15) Democratic Frustration (8:09) Conclusion

Video Transcript AI Summary
Victor Davis Hanson argues that “The Democrats have a new narrative, the left in general does, that they are saving democracy from Donald Trump” and that this justifies “almost any means necessary” to stop him. The problem, he says, is they are “destroying democracy to destroy Donald Trump.” He cites redistricting as evidence: “gerrymandering” in Texas and California, noting the left is “way ahead of the right” and that Republicans are “short some six to 10 seats” based on the national vote. Democrats allegedly insist “we've already gerrymandered our states to the maximum” and “Don't dare try to emulate us.” The piece repeats yelling and tough talk: “James Carville said that they have to get tougher... Hakim Jeffries picks up his baseball bat” and “Cory Booker screams and yells.” Hanson catalogs “three great scandals”—“Russian collusion hoax,” “Hunter Biden laptop” with “51 former intelligence authorities”—and lists impeachment, raid on Mar-a-Lago, attempted ballot access removal, assassination attempts, debanking. He concludes they sabotaged democracy and now face payback.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The Democrats have a new narrative, the left in general does. They are saving democracy from Donald Trump. That justifies almost any means necessary to achieve the end of destroying or preventing Donald Trump from governing effectively. The problem with all of this is they are destroying democracy to destroy Donald Trump. James Carville said that they have to get tougher. That's the new man. We gotta get tougher. We gotta get meaner. Haikum Jeffries picks up his baseball bat. Cory Booker screams and yells and throws a fit about every three weeks in the senate. But you can see the anger, and now the new idea is that they haven't been tough enough. In fact, the opposite is true, everybody. You have been the most vicious and the most abject subverters of democracy all for the short term gain of destroying Donald Trump. Hello. This is Victor Davis Hanson for The Daily Signal. The Democrats have a new narrative, the left in general does, that they are saving democracy from Donald Trump. And that justifies almost any means necessary to achieve the end of destroying or preventing Donald Trump from governing effectively. The problem with all of this is they are destroying democracy to destroy Donald Trump. What do I mean? One of the issues that they are agitating is the redistricting of congressional districts in Texas, in California now. And the general problem the left has is if you look at gerrymandering to make these jigsaw puzzle piece like districts, the left is way ahead of the right. In other words, states that have proportions of 30 to 40 to 50% for Trump do not have that level of representation in the Congress. And there's been sophisticated studies of gerrymandering, and it boils down to the Republicans are short some six to 10 seats in the House based on the proportion of the national vote they have received. The Democrats know that, but they're angry about the Texas reapportionment and gerrymandering. And their attitude is, we've already gerrymandered our states to the maximum. Don't dare try to emulate us. James Carville said that they have to get tougher. That's the new mantra. Gotta get tougher, gotta get meaner. Cory Booker screams and yells and throws a fit about every three weeks in the Senate. Hakim Jeffries picks up his baseball bat. There's usually a video with the squad or representatives using the word SHIT or the F word, kind of pornographic. Jasmine Crockett periodically calls Donald Trump names that can't be repeated on air. But you can see the anger. And now the new idea is that they haven't been tough enough. They have been too tough. There's been three great scandals in the twenty first century. The first was the Russian collusion hoax that was prompted by Hillary Clinton and facilitated by the Obama administration on its way out that almost destroyed the Trump campaign, sabotaged his transition, and ate up twenty two months of his first two years. The second was the Biden, FBI, and CIA, but especially the CIA and the intelligence agencies, got 51 people, former intelligence authorities, to lie to the American people on the eve of the second debate to affect the two thousand twenty election and claimed falsely that Donald Trump was lying about the laptop of Biden Hunter Biden, that it was fake, that it was a Russian production, and Donald Trump then was colluding again with the Russians. That was a complete lie. It was Hunter's laptop, we know, because the FBI had it in his possessions and unauthenticated. And finally, the great scandal that the Democratic Party and the obsequious media knew that Joe Biden was non Campos mentees. He was not cognitively cognitively able to fulfill the office of presidents, the presidency, and they kept that from the American people until they could no longer keep it when he finally challenged Donald Trump to a debate and melted before our very eyes, sort of like the Wicked Witch and The Wizard of Oz. He melted into a nonentity. So my point is, if you look at the Democrats, they have stage three great scandals to try to destroy the Trump administration and by extension, democracy. They impeached Donald Trump twice. No one's ever done that. They tried him as a private citizen. Nobody's ever done that. They raided his home in Mar A Lago. That is a terrible president for an ex president president. No one has ever done that. They tried to get him off the ballot in 25 states. No one had ever done that. There were two assassination attempts during the campaign. That had never happened before. They tried to debank him and make it impossible for Donald Trump to write a check whether from Morgan Stanley or Bank of America or any bank. So my point is this, when James Carville says, we're gonna get tough, we're gonna get really tough, and we're gonna let in Puerto Rico and Washington DC to get four senators, or we might have to pack the court to 13. I justice, I I'm thinking, well, you always were going to do that. You were going to pack to 15. In fact, if you had not lost the House and Senate during the Biden administration, had you had a normal president that was in control of his mental and physical abilities, then you would have not only, packed the court and not only, as you promised, let in two states, but in addition you would have gotten rid of the electoral college by the hook and cook of the National Voter Compact, and more importantly, you would have abolished the Senate. So the problem, James Carville and Democrats, is that you have sabotaged democracy, and you've done things that no one has ever done before to an oppositional candidate, transition presidential transition, and president. And now you're furious because you're on the 40% side of every issue that's dear to you, from the trans issue to the border issue to the crime issue to the Green New Deal issue to foreign policy. And you have no political power. You don't have the White House. You don't have the Congress. You don't have the Supreme Court. And your institutional power, the media, academia, the foundation, they are under assault. So you're frustrated and you've created this completely false narrative that you have to get tough and you've been very Marcus of Queensbury rules like. In fact, the opposite is true to everybody. You have been the most vicious and the most abject subverters of democracy, all for the short term gain of destroying Donald Trump. And now that's booming booming boomeranging upon you, and you don't like to see it happen to you what you tried to do to Donald Trump. And there's a whole vocabulary cross culturally for what is happening to you now. It's called called payback is a blank karma boomerang. Do unto others, you should do unto you, only eye for an eye, tooth for tooth. But this is called retribution and it's fully earned for what you've done to democracy as long as it's legal and it's necessary. But, you're angry because you're impotent and you created false narratives that Donald Trump is doing what you have actually done. What is that? Destroying democracy. Thank you very much. This is Victor Davis Hanson for The Daily Signal. Thank you for tuning in to The Daily Signal. Please like, share, and subscribe to be notified for more content like this. You can also check out my own website at victorhansen.com and subscribe for exclusive features in addition.
The Daily Signal We believe that high-quality, credible news reporting on political and policy issues is of paramount importance to an informed and free society. The Daily Si... youtube.com
Victor Davis Hanson This is the official YouTube channel for Dr. Victor Davis Hanson.Dr. Hanson is the Martin and Illie Anderson Senior Fellow at the Hoover Institution, and his... youtube.com
Home Has the Military Lost Middle America VDH’s Blade of Perseus // Private Papers Traditionalist and conservative America once was the U.S. military’s greatest defender. Bipartisan conservatives in Congress ensured generous Pentagon budgets. Statistics of those killed in action, in both Afghanistan and Iraq, reveal that white males, especially those of the rural and middle classes, […] victorhanson.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@DailySignal Special thanks to @overton_news for helping me put this thread together! If you’re into truth-seeking news accounts like mine, they’re definitely worth a follow here and on Substack: —> @overton_news —> https://www.overtonnews.com/p/who-is-overton.

Who is Overton? Time to peel back the curtain. overtonnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@DailySignal @overton_news I was banned 3 times from Twitter 1.0 for defying mainstream narratives. If censorship strikes again, you’ll always find my latest threads at http://VigilantFox.com. I sift through the news so you can live your life. Stay Informed Here: https://www.vigilantfox.com/p/how-to-stay-informed-with-vigilant.

The Vigilant Fox | Substack Writer, video clipper, and pro-freedom citizen journalist with 12 years of healthcare experience. Tyranny is not possible without compliance. Click to read The Vigilant Fox, a Substack publication with hundreds of thousands of subscribers. vigilantfox.com
How to Stay Informed with The Vigilant Fox WELCOME NEW READERS! vigilantfox.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@DailySignal @overton_news Thanks for reading. For more in-depth stories the mainstream won’t touch, follow me on 𝕏. —> @VigilantFox Looking for something else to read? RED STATE REVOLT: DeSantis Steps Into the Fight to CRUSH Democrat Map-Rigging in Florida https://t.co/sMhtVh1JMS

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

REVOLT. Republicans are FIGHTING back. GOP governors are now OPENLY talking about redistricting to COUNTER Democrat gerrymandering SCHEMES. Governor DeSantis says he even caught Obama trying to RIG Florida’s map. Then he dropped the numbers that could CHANGE the Midterms: “In 2018, there were 300,000 more registered Democrats than Republicans. Today there are 1.3 million more registered Republicans than Democrats.” 🧵 THREAD

Saved - August 26, 2025 at 12:52 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Norm Eisen, a key advisor to Barack Obama, confessed to leading a Color Revolution against Trump, claiming it was part of a long-term strategy to undermine the U.S. government. He revealed that he orchestrated a coup through the State Democracy Defenders Fund, established after the 2020 government overthrow.

@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

Here it is: Barack Obama’s consigliere, Norm Eisen, admitted to waging a Color Revolution against Trump as part of a years-long plot to overthrow the United States government—yet again. • He admitted to orchestrating a multi-faceted coup against President Trump through his State Democracy Defenders Fund, formed immediately after the overthrow of the United States government in 2020.

Video Transcript AI Summary
State Democracy Defenders Fund formed after stopping the attempted coup of twenty twenty and began on January 7, 2021, combining the most successful coup fighters with anti-autocracy experts. They studied Hungary, Turkey, Poland, Brazil, and the Czech Republic to understand why autocracy failed or succeeded there. They emphasize that "It's not just litigation. Litigation is very important in our peaceful, lawful, vigorous effort." They describe three guardrails: "Think of litigation, the courts as the first guardrail"; "The next one is political leadership"; and "the third and maybe the most important... The people." They note protests doubling in 2025 versus 2021, and launched The Contrarian, with Jen Rubin quitting the Washington Post and I quitting CNN, reaching "600,000 subscribers" in two months. They recount cases like blocking Elon Musk out of the Treasury, which produced an order. They forecast a 2026 ballot wipeout and argue Trump and Musk are unpopular.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: My organization, the State Democracy Defenders Fund, we were born out of the success in stopping the attempted coup of twenty twenty. And I kind of got the people who I admired the most. I worked representing multiple parties fighting in court, but also in the court of public opinion in that unsuccessful effort to reverse the legitimate outcome of the twenty twenty election. I got the best people together who I thought were the toughest, the smartest and who won a lot in 2020. And we added in building our organization. We started this immediately after. This work started on January 7, this new work, 2021, right after the coup failed when the the violent insurrection that Trump inspired on January 6 was defeated. I started combining the most successful coup fighters that I came across in my work in 2020 with experts who had helped study or defeat autocracy internationally. So we went to places over the intervening years, like Hungary and Turkey, where the effort to oust an autocrat failed. Why did it fail? What did they fail to do? But we also looked at places like Poland, Brazil, Czech Republic, the country where I served as ambassador, where there were successful ousters in recent years of autocratic regimes. And we came together over that four year period with a plan to defeat autocracy. It's not just litigation. Litigation is very important in our peaceful, lawful, vigorous effort. Think of litigation, the courts as the first guardrail. Donald Trump has been loudly banging into that guardrail in this, over a 150 cases where we and others have had so many wins. Because we've been winning, that guardrail is holding. But that loud banging is waking up two other barriers that lie two other guardrails that lie on the other side of litigation. The next one is political leadership, where we've seen in The United States that elected officials mostly at the state levels like the state AGs, they've been going to court but they've been talking, holding town halls, speaking to the American people. Now Congress is starting to get in the act. So that's a second layer of protection. The third and maybe the most important, and this is the difference. This is why autocracy was defeated in Poland and why it is still there down the block in Hungary. The people. When you awaken the American people, which that loud banging in the first guardrail has done. Do you know that there's twice as many protests in 2025 as there were in 2021. 2021 was covered as the era of big protest against Donald Trump. There's actually been more in 2025. Another thing we've done is, we've incubated the an independent publication at Democracy Defenders. It's called The Contrarian. Jen Rubin quit the Washington Post. I quit the CNN, and we started the contrarian. In two months, we've got 600,000 subscribers. We're the first publication in America to have a beat on the democracy movement where we cover all of these protests sometimes hundreds a week. It's everything from town halls where people of both parties are telling congressmen and senators, why are you going along with authoritarianism that's hurting us? It's hurting the American people. The veterans services are being gutted. People are angry about that. Schools are being gutted. Safety for our air and water and our vaccines. There's a measles epidemic. The people are angry. But also smaller protests like spontaneous in front of Tesla dealerships. And one of my cases, got had a case locking Elon Musk out of the treasury department. I was getting ready to go to court. I turned on the television and a spontaneous protest had erupted in front of the treasury department in support of my case, keep Elon Musk out of treasury. We did get that order blocking him out of treasury. And then suddenly, I see members of congress are showing up at the protest because they didn't wanna be left out. So those are the next two after the litigation. Political opposition, the treetops, but the American people, the grassroots. And when those three things combined together, authoritarianism and autocracy doesn't have a chance. And I think you're gonna see a wipeout at the ballot box, for example, with the House of Representatives in 2026 because people just don't like this autocratic regime. Donald Trump is very unpopular. Most unpopular president except for Trump won at this point in his tenure, and Elon Musk, his co president, is absolutely hated by the American people. He has abysmal popularity ratings.
Saved - November 8, 2025 at 2:30 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I read a claim alleging sedition by Barack Obama and every co-conspirator from the White House down. It quotes DNI Gabbard saying Obama ordered the overthrow after 2016 in favor of Hillary Clinton, lists numerous officials and entities, accuses them of manufacturing the “Russian collusion” hoax to topple the government and oust Trump, and cites a coverup by Christopher Wray—Watergate pales beside it.

@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

Here it is: Just thirty-eight seconds of Barack Obama——sedition—and every single co-conspirator involved, from the White House down. Director of National Intelligence @DNIGabbard: “Barack Hussein Obama ordered the overthrow of the United States government on behalf of Hillary Clinton after the 2016 election was over—after the American people said no, we want Donald Trump to be our commander in chief, not Hillary Clinton.” Barack Hussein Obama: JOHN BRENNAN, JAMES CLAPPER, JAMES COMEY, SUSAN RICE, LORETTA LYNCH, SALLY YATES, LISA MONACO, HILLARY CLINTON, ADAM SCHIFF, ANDREW MCCABE, PETER STRZOK, LISA PAGE, BRUCE OHR, NELLIE OHR, ROBERT MUELLER, ROD ROSENSTEIN, ANDREW WEISSMANN, VALERIE JARRETT, BEN RHODES, JOHN CARLIN, MARY MCCORD, JAMES BAKER, JONATHAN MOFFA, MICHAEL KORTAN, DAVID LAUFMAN, SAMANTHA POWER, JOHN KERRY, DENIS MCDONOUGH, JIM RYBICKI, BILL PRIESTAP, CHRISTOPHER STEELE, RICHARD DEARLOVE, ALEXANDER DOWNER, STEFAN HALPER, JOSEF MIFSUD, SERGEI MILLIAN, SIDNEY BLUMENTHAL, CODY SHEARER, TERRY MCAULIFFE, JONATHAN WINER, JOHN PODESTA, HUMA ABEDIN, ANTHONY WEINER, CHERYL MILLS, HEATHER SAMUELSON, JAKE SULLIVAN, ROBBIE MOOK, DEBBIE WASSERMAN SCHULTZ, PETER KADZIK, RACHEL BRAND, MATTHEW AXELROD, MARY JACOBY, PREET BHARARA, JOSH CAMPBELL, JENNIFER PALMIERI, SIR ANDREW WOOD, ROBERT HANNIGAN, ALEXANDRA CHALUPA, MICHAEL SUSSMANN, DMITRY ALPEROVICH, and officials from the DNC, CrowdStrike, Fusion GPS (including Glenn Simpson), and Perkins Coie (including Marc Elias) and don’t you dare forget about the coverup—Christopher Wray. —all manufactured the “Russian collusion” conspiracy hoax, a years-long seditious conspiracy with the sole intent of toppling the United States government during the 2016 presidential election and of overthrowing the duly elected president in 2017. Watergate? not even close!

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 says that over the last several weeks they declassified and released documents exposing that President Obama and leaders in the intelligence community knowingly manufactured a false intelligence document after the 2016 election. The document alleged that Russia aspired to help President Trump win the election with the aim of undermining his presidency and usurping the will and the voices of the American people who sent Trump to the White House.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We look at where we are now over the last several weeks. We've declassified and released documents that exposed how president Obama and leaders in the intelligence community knowingly manufactured a false intelligence document after the twenty sixteen election was done, after the American people said, no, we want Donald Trump to go and be our commander in chief, not Hillary Clinton. And this manufactured document alleged that Russia aspired to help president Trump win the election with the aim of undermining his presidency and usurping the will and the voices of the American people who sent Trump to the White House.
View Full Interactive Feed