reSee.it - Related Post Feed

Saved - August 1, 2023 at 3:50 AM

@AlexBerenson - Alex Berenson

Not this extremely well-designed paper, which showed ZERO decrease in influenza deaths or hospitalizations in England from flu shots: "No evidence indicated that vaccination reduced hospitalizations or mortality among elderly persons." https://acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/M19-3075?_ga=2.114195335.1018164567.1690725746-1383712439.1690725746…

@anish_koka - Anish Koka, MD

I’d be curious to hear what the recommendation for the annual flu vaccine is based on cc @gadboit

@VPrasadMDMPH - Vinay Prasad MD MPH

Without randomized data showing people have lower severe disease (and for your age) this is not only unacceptable, it is bad medicine and unethical. No one will comply. It is sad to be a CDC director living in Pfizer's pocket.

@michaelpsenger - Michael P Senger

New CDC Director Mandy Cohen: “We anticipate that COVID will become similar to flu shots, where it is going to be you get your annual flu shot and you get your annual COVID shot.” I was literally suspended from Twitter for predicting this back in 2021. https://www.ny1.com/nyc/all-boroughs/news/2023/07/27/cdc-director-covid-shot-annual-

CDC likely to recommend annual COVID shot in the fall, director says In an interview with Spectrum News, newly minted CDC Director Mandy Cohen talked about working to restore trust in the agency. ny1.com
Saved - August 1, 2023 at 3:09 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
In the midst of the pandemic, numerous questionable actions and statements have left many perplexed. Cancer screenings were canceled, leading to avoidable deaths, while dance routines took precedence. Asymptomatic individuals were suddenly considered symptomatic, and PCR tests were deemed fraudulent. Bizarre symptoms were attributed to COVID, without any scrutiny. Misleading claims about Ivermectin's safety were made, potentially costing lives. Plexiglass screens separated customers, yet cashiers handled their products. Seemingly contradictory rules were imposed, like the safety of eating in restaurants but the danger of restroom visits. The disappearance of the flu was attributed to COVID's dominance, but eradicating it so swiftly remains puzzling. Innocuous activities were deemed threats, while staying indoors and consuming fast food were not. Supermarket arrows became a matter of life and death, their logic still unclear. Vaccination incentives like unhealthy food raised concerns. Mask mandates showed little difference in case numbers between states. Dubious scientific practices, such as fast-tracked publications and conflicting statements, raised eyebrows. Natural immunity was dismissed, dissenting voices silenced, and manipulated images fueled fear. Suspicious investments in vaccine companies by influential figures added to the skepticism. Blaming the unvaccinated for vaccine failures lacked logic. Flip-flopping on COVID's origins and funding connections raised doubts. Despite being deplatformed, the author vows to continue speaking out against these actions.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

🧵THREAD: Remember when they cancelled millions of cancer screening appointments, leading to a significant increase in avoidable cancer deaths, while they performed ridiculous dance routines instead? Let me show you 20 more pieces of evidence proving that Covid was a big hoax.⬇️

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

#1. Remember when being symptomless was considered one of the symptoms? The lie that one could be asymptotically ill, along with fraudulent PCR tests, only made this plandemic possible. Either you are sick, or you aren't; being healthy was not a symptom of illness until 2020.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

#2. Remember when the CCP 🇨🇳 released CCTV recordings showing people collapsing on the street like sacks of rice, catching themselves with their hands just before impact, and then shaking spasmodically? They said it was one of the Covid symptoms and nobody ever questioned it.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

#3. Remember when Big Pharma shills like @PeterHotez told us that Ivermectin was horse paste and potentially harmful? It turns out, it could have saved millions of lives. Their true intention to mislead the general public needs to be criminally investigated.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

#4. Remember when they separated cashiers and customers with large Plexiglass screens, yet the cashier touched all the products the customer then took home?

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

#5. Remember when they told us that eating while seated in a restaurant would be safe, but a simple walk to the restroom could potentially be lethal and thus required wearing a face diaper?

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

#6. Remember when the flu totally disappeared in 2021, and they said it was simply because Covid was more transmissive? There's nothing simple about eradicating influenza from 100+ countries in just 28 days.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

#7. Remember when activities such as jogging alone at the beach, reading a book on a park bench, or taking a walk after 8 pm were considered threats to public health, but staying inside, avoiding the sun, and eating delivery fast food were not?

Video Transcript AI Summary
Stefano Baldini is seen in the final stretch with fixed cameras. Vigilio is about to enter and Greco is following closely behind. Stefano Baldini enters the Palatinaico for the last race of the 2008 police. Stefano Pasini is still in the race, but there is still one lap left to complete. Stefano is doing well despite the challenges. Finally, Stefano crosses the finish line and wins the marathon, securing the last medal for Italy in these Olympic Games. Stefano Caldini is praised for his victory.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Ci cominciano ad esserci le telecamere fisse con Stefano Baldini nel tratto finale. Diamo Vigilio, sta per entrare, farà Greco, è a Fista Stefano Baldini. Il suo ingresso al Palatinaico nell'ultima gara della polizia del ventotto Stefano Pasini attenzione che è lunga ancora perché c'è un giro, c'è uno stadio da compiere. Dietro un metro che crisi di che non ha mollato del tutto ma questo casino. Continente ancora vai Stefano. Ci a bordo, si devono bambini, si devono bambini, la vittoria è tutta sua, ultimo medaglia del dono di questi giochi olimpici. La Malatona, una delle gare singole del gioco in ufficio italiana, va a Stefano Caldini, bravo, bravo, bravo,

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

#8. Remember when you were considered a social menace if you walked in the opposite direction of the arrows in supermarkets? I still haven't completely understood the logic behind it, and I wonder how many lives have been spared by this measure.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

#9. Remember when public health officials and politicians, such as @BilldeBlasio, tried to lure people into getting vaccinated with unhealthy things like doughnuts and fast food? Inflammatory 'food' plus clot shots - what could possibly go wrong?

Video Transcript AI Summary
Get free fries when you get vaccinated. I got vaccinated, so can I get this? There's also a burger element to this, but it's too early for breakfast. Respect all ways of life, but if this appeals to you, think of it when you think of vaccination. Feeling good about the vaccination rate right now.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Free fries when you get vaccinated. I got vaccinated. You're saying I could get this? With delicious fries? Why not? But there's also a burger element to this? Let me check with Bill Meadhart. Is it too early in the day to eat a this could be breakfast? Yes. Okay. I want you to look at this and think about again, some people love hamburgers. Some don't. Really want to respect all ways of life. But If this is appealing to you, just think of this when you think of vaccination. Vaccinations. I'm getting a very good feeling about vaccination rate this moment.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

#10. Remember when they said that masks were reducing transmission, but neighboring states (e.g., North Dakota with lockdowns and a mask mandate, South Dakota as a free society) with and without mask mandates showed similar amounts of 'cases'?

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

#11. Remember when the Covid PCR protocol paper, co-authored by @MarionKoopmans, bypassed peer-review and was published within one day? It was then declared the gold standard by a WHO committee the very next day, a committee on which Koopmans was a member. https://www.drgoddek.com/p/how-scientific-fraud-took-the-world

How Scientific Fraud took the World Hostage Drosten's test is the pest. drgoddek.com

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

#12. Remember when 'public health experts' such as @DrLeanaWen asserted that the vaccines worked, yet claimed that the unvaccinated still posed a threat to the vaccinated?

Video Transcript AI Summary
Vaccinated individuals are facing consequences due to the actions of the unvaccinated. While vaccinated people are safe around each other, being surrounded by unvaccinated individuals in high transmission areas can lead to spillover infections. Even though these infections are usually not severe, it highlights the effectiveness of the vaccine. However, with the Delta variant, there is still a possibility of getting sick and transmitting it to family members. It is crucial for vaccinated individuals to understand that they are not fully protected.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Are paying a price for the actions of the unvaccinated because what we know is that the vaccinated are very safe around one another. So the 2 of you, all of us, if we're vaccinated, we're safe around each other. But if we're vaccinated and we're surrounded by a whole bunch of unvaccinated people, especially in areas with high coronavirus transmission, there's going to be spillover, and that's what we're seeing, that we're seeing vaccinated people also get infections. Now they tend to not be severe infections, which points to the effectiveness of the vaccine, but it's possible that especially with the Delta variant, we could still get ill, we could pass it on to our family members. And so I think it's really important that vaccinated people stop thinking that we're fully protected.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

#13. Remember when they tried to convince us that natural immunity was a dangerous conspiracy theory?

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

#14. Remember when people like @oatlia and @R_H_Ebright wanted to silence those with differing opinions and exclude them from society, instead of seeking a substantive dialogue on an equal footing?

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

#15. Remember when they showed fake photos of coffins from Bergamo, Italy, in March 2020, which terrified the world and contributed to the lockdown frenzy and global PsyOp?

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

#16. Remember when @BillGates said that the investments in the Covid 'vaccines' were his best investment ever? It's quite obvious that he knew what was going to happen, considering he invested about $50,000,000 in BioNTech, a company that until then had only reported losses.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Investing in the S&P 500 with reinvested dividends would have yielded around $17 billion, not $200 billion. Vaccinated individuals are protected against COVID-19 and its variants, reducing transmission and allowing society to return to normal. Getting both vaccine shots is crucial for stopping transmission and achieving high immunity levels. Fully vaccinated people can participate in activities without masks or distancing, but they can still transmit the virus. Reports from Israel indicate a decline in immunity, suggesting the need for booster shots. Israel plans to administer boosters to all adults. Overall, investing in vaccines has been a highly successful venture.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Spend over a 20 to 1 return. Speaker 1: If you had put that money into an S&P 500 and reinvested the dividends, you'd come up with something like $17,000,000,000, but you think it's $200,000,000,000. Here, yeah. Speaker 2: You're okay. You're not gonna you're not gonna get COVID if you have these vaccinations. Speaker 3: These vaccines are Highly, highly effective. Speaker 4: Vaccinated people do not carry the virus, don't get sick. Speaker 3: They're really, really good against variants. Speaker 5: Everyone who takes the vaccine is not just protecting themselves, but reducing their transmission, to other people and allowing society to get back to Normal. Speaker 4: Get your 1st shot and when you're due for your 2nd, get your 2nd shot. Speaker 5: Our key goal is to stop the transmission, to get the immunity levels up So that you get almost no infection going on whatsoever. Speaker 3: When people are vaccinated, they can feel safe that They are not gonna get infected. Speaker 2: If you're vaccinated, you're not gonna be hospitalized, you're not gonna be in ICU unit And you're not going to die. If you are fully vaccinated, you no longer need to wear a mask. Speaker 4: Anyone who is fully vaccinated Can participate in indoor and outdoor activities, large or small, without wearing a mask or physical distancing. But, what they can't do anymore is prevent transmission. Speaker 5: You know, we didn't have vaccines that block transmission. We got vaccines to help you with your health, but they only slightly reduce the penetration. We need a new new way of doing the vaccine. Speaker 3: The level of virus in the nasal Farries of a person who's vaccinated and infected is the same level as the level of virus in the nasal Speaker 4: Reports from our international colleagues, including Israel, suggest increased risk of severe disease amongst those back to me early. Speaker 3: And if you look at Israel, which has always been a month to a month And a half ahead of us, they are seeing a waning of immunity not only against infection But against hospitalizations and to some extent debt, the booster might actually be an essential part Of the primary regimen that people should have. The plan Speaker 2: is for every Israel, every adult to get a booster shot. Speaker 5: Clearly one of the best investments, I've ever been involved in.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

#17. Remember when politicians, journalists, and other public figures all suddenly began using the phrase 'Build Back Better'? In a real deadly pandemic such an orchestrated show would have been possible.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers discuss the concept of "building back better" in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. They emphasize the need to reset and improve various aspects of society, such as education and mental health. They mention Joe Biden's use of the phrase and a booklet called "Build Back Better" that focuses on rebuilding the country. The speakers also mention a conspiracy theory called the "great reset" that criticizes the idea. Overall, they highlight the opportunity presented by the pandemic to rethink and reset our way of living.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's a very pertinent question to ask how do we build back better? Speaker 1: To build back better or whatever. We have a chance to reset the clock and build back better than Speaker 0: before. To build back better than before. Speaker 1: Remember the the terrible damage of COVID as we try to build back from this, our global pandemic. Joe Biden calls it Build Back Better. Build Back Better. Building back better. Speaker 0: To do things differently, to build back better. Speaker 1: We're going to build it back better. Speaker 0: And build it back better. And my plan to build back better. Start taking all the problems that that have been created in education and mental health and start to build back in a positive way. Speaker 1: I have launched a booklet called Build Back Better written after coronavirus. It's about building this country back better. Growing conspiracy following it. It is called the great reset. Speaker 2: Unprecedented opportunity to rethink And reset the ways in which we live. Speaker 0: The great opportunity for reset. Speaker 1: The theory even calls Mr. Biden's campaign slogan, Build Back Better, a front for the conspiracy. Speaker 0: Build Back Better. Building Back Better our economy. Speaker 1: Build back beta. Speaker 0: All elements of the great reset are fundamental to building the future we need. This pandemic has provided an opportunity for a reset. Speaker 2: It's a big effort To some would say to build back back better. We would say To really have a reason, can I please set Speaker 1: Conspiracy? Conspiracy. Conspiracy.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

#18. Remember when the mainstream media blamed the unvaccinated for the deaths of vaccinated people, asserting it was because they were not vaccinated themselves? If a treatment does not work, it is simply illogical to blame those who rejected the treatment for its failure.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

#19. Remember when @K_G_Andersen changed his stance on COVID's origins in just four days, subsequently receiving additional funding from Fauci, and then labeled everyone questioning his 'scientific integrity' as 'anti-science'?

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

#20. Remember when I got de-platformed from Twitter for speaking out? Well, I'm back, and I won't let them silence me again! If, like me, you are not ready to forgive, I invite you to follow me (@goddeketal) and enjoy my daily content where I expose those who did this to us.

Saved - August 16, 2023 at 4:30 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The medical establishment faces scrutiny as JAMAnetwork investigates 52 American MDs countering Covid19 misinformation. Recourse is threatened against them. Misinformation and corruption plague the profit-driven pharmaceutical industry-funded system. Shea, a mouthpiece for ScienceUpFirst, funded by PHAC overseen by Health Canada, denies any conflict. Claims about preventable deaths are based on flawed models. Vaccines' potential to prevent deaths is highlighted.

@AJKayWriter - AJ Kay

Just when you thought the medical establishment couldn’t get any more untrustworthy, @JAMAnetwork publishes an “investigation” of 52 American MDs who countered Covid-19 lies & propaganda — & unambiguously threatens them with “recourse,” no less… 1/7

@AJKayWriter - AJ Kay

This utter nonsense is prime example of the type of misinformation — and corruption of their profession — they were fighting. The modern medical establishment is a profit-driven, politically-captured, pharmaceutical-industry-funded scourge with self-serving shills like Shea 2/7

@AJKayWriter - AJ Kay

To be clear, Shea is a mouthpiece for @ScienceUpFirst, an “anti-misinformation” initiative which is funded by the Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC) which is overseen by Health Canada which derives most of its funding from the pharmaceutical industry. But no conflict, right? 3

@AJKayWriter - AJ Kay

@ScienceUpFirst Weird. Twitter won’t let me post the rest of the thread… 🤔

@AJKayWriter - AJ Kay

Even the claim about 1/3 of deaths being preventable if PH recommendations were followed is a misrepresentation of the info. They’re referencing a (flawed) model that made political inferences about at vaccine uptake — not general “PH recommendations.” 4/7 https://globalepidemics.org/2022/05/13/new-analysis-shows-vaccines-could-have-prevented-318000-deaths/

New Analysis Shows Vaccines Could Have Prevented 318,000 Deaths - Global Epidemics Brown School of Public Health and Microsoft AI for Health release a new dashboard that shows vaccine preventable death nationwide and for each state, providing critical insights for state and federal Covid-19 response teams. globalepidemics.org
Saved - August 25, 2023 at 4:15 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The US government wants you to believe that the newly detected coronavirus caused a surge in respiratory disease mortality due to mass testing and shutdowns. However, the numbers don't add up. This virus supposedly killed 33 more people in 13 weeks than all other respiratory diseases combined in 21 weeks. It's not scientifically plausible. We need to reclassify iatrogenic deaths and consider other factors. Medical misadventures and crime have their own ICD codes.

@EWoodhouse7 - Jessica Hockett

The U.S. government wants you to believe: 1) A newly-detected deadly coronavirus wasn't doing anything to hospital respiratory disease mortality til the advent of mass testing and shutdowns. 2) This CV was capable of killing ~33% more people in 13 weeks than had died in 21 weeks by all other respiratory disease causes. 3) There were *enough* people vulnerable to this CV at this point in the flu season, when the most vulnerable would've already died. This is not biologically/epidemiologically or mechanistically plausible. At minimum, every iatrogenic death in those weeks needs to be removed from U07.1 and re-classified under the correct ICD code.

@EWoodhouse7 - Jessica Hockett

He who has ears, let him hear. ⬇️

@EWoodhouse7 - Jessica Hockett

No, but there are ICD codes for "medical misadventures" and crime. https://t.co/TdO1gqCXFV

Saved - August 27, 2023 at 7:07 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Title: Unveiling the Truth: The Dark Realities Surrounding COVID-19 and Vaccination Introduction: Welcome to this eye-opening thread that aims to expose the hidden truths behind the COVID-19 pandemic and the vaccination campaign. In this comprehensive post, we will delve into various alarming aspects, including media manipulation, PCR test controversies, attacks on the unvaccinated, and the unsettling events surrounding the disappearance of the flu. Brace yourself for a thought-provoking journey that will challenge the mainstream narrative and encourage you to stay informed and vigilant. Media Manipulation and PCR Test Controversies: Let's start by addressing the media's control over our minds. It is no secret that the mainstream media plays a significant role in shaping public opinion. However, it is crucial to question the information presented to us. The PCR test, a widely used diagnostic tool, has faced scrutiny due to potential manipulation, leading to inflated COVID-19 case numbers. By understanding these manipulations, we can gain a clearer perspective on the true impact of the virus. Relentless Attacks on the Unvaccinated: Another concerning aspect is the relentless attacks on those who choose not to receive the COVID-19 vaccine. It is essential to respect individual choices and engage in open dialogue rather than resorting to divisive tactics. By fostering understanding and empathy, we can create a more inclusive society that encourages informed decision-making. Event 201, Fauci's Predictions, and Catastrophic Contagion Exercises: Let's explore the events surrounding Event 201, a pandemic simulation exercise that took place shortly before the COVID-19 outbreak. This exercise raises questions about the preparedness and response strategies implemented during the actual pandemic. Additionally, we will examine the predictions made by Dr. Anthony Fauci, a prominent figure in the pandemic response, and how they have shaped our understanding of the crisis. Furthermore, we will shed light on a catastrophic contagion exercise that specifically targeted children, highlighting the potential risks and consequences faced by the most vulnerable members of society. The Disappearance of the Flu and Alarming VAERS Data: One puzzling phenomenon during the pandemic has been the disappearance of the flu. We will explore the possible reasons behind this unexpected occurrence and its implications for public health. Additionally, we will delve into the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) data, which reveals concerning adverse reactions to COVID-19 vaccines. Of particular concern is the rise in myocarditis cases among young adults and children, shedding light on potential risks associated with vaccination. CDC's Manipulation of Vaccination-Related Deaths: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has faced scrutiny regarding its handling of vaccination-related deaths. By examining the manipulation of data and the potential underreporting of adverse events, we can gain a deeper understanding of the risks associated with COVID-19 vaccines. It is crucial to ensure transparency and accountability in order to protect public health. Disturbing Findings and Potential Crimes Against Humanity: Prepare yourself for some truly disturbing findings. Pfizer's addition of an anti-heart attack drug for 5-11-year-olds due to cardiac disorders raises serious concerns about the safety of COVID-19 vaccines. Shockingly, medical professionals have reported heart attacks in vaccinated pregnant women, leading to a staggering increase in stillbirths and various complications. These findings point to potential crimes against humanity, demanding further investigation and accountability. Conclusion: In conclusion, it is imperative that we question the mainstream narrative surrounding COVID-19 and vaccination. By staying informed and vigilant, we can uncover the hidden truths and ensure that public health measures are based on transparency, accountability, and the well-being of all individuals. Let us continue to seek the truth and engage in open dialogue to create a society that values critical thinking and informed decision-making. Stay tuned for more updates as we navigate through these challenging times.

@MJTruthUltra - UltraMJTruth

MASTER THREAD 🧵 THE PLANDEMIC The Greatest Trick the the CDC ever pulled was convince everyone they were sick without any symptoms. Bookmark this Thread! This Master Thread will be updated with everything I’ve accumulated over the last 3 years. It will take me some time to update & it will be an ongoing thread for you to refer to. I will update this thread with 5-10 posts at a time, over time. WHY AM I DOING THIS? I’m just a normal guy with a family… who began questioning where this medical tyranny was taking us. Then I, as did thousands of fellow patriots who felt like something was very wrong, began speaking up. As a consequence to speaking up, thousands of us were banned off of social media. I’ve only been back a few months now, but I have 3 years worth of research that I want everyone to use as ammunition to help awaken others and hopefully avert Plandemic 2.0, which is coming. I have my theories as to why all of this is happening, but for this thread I will do my best to stick to facts & leave conjecture out of it. Let’s begin…

@MJTruthUltra - UltraMJTruth

This is my very first post in this thread because I believe the greatest driver of the Plandemic was the Main Stream Media. Whoever controls the media, controls the mind. Roughly six corporations control 90+% of ALL what you hear, read, & see. This video should terrify you. As we move forward in this thread, keep this video in mind. https://rumble.com/v3braja-the-mockingbird-mainstream-media-the-illusion-of-choice.html

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers discuss the prevalence of biased and false news on social media, with some media outlets publishing these stories without fact-checking. They emphasize that this is extremely dangerous to our democracy, repeating this statement multiple times.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: One side of the inquiry. Plagging our country. Plagging our country. Speaker 1: The sharing of bias and false news has become all too common on social media. More alarming, some media outlets publish these same fake stories without checking facts first. Speaker 0: The sharing fault. Biased and false. False news has become all too common on social media. Fault. And agenda control is exactly what they play. And this is extremely dangerous to our democracy. This is extremely dangerous to our democracy. This is extremely dangerous to our democracy. Speaker 1: This is extremely dangerous to our democracy. Speaker 0: This is extremely dangerous to our fault. Speaker 1: This is extremely dangerous to our democracy. Speaker 0: This is extremely dangerous to our democracy. This is extremely dangerous to our democracy. This is extremely dangerous to our democracy. This is extremely dangerous to our democracy. Okay. This is extremely dangerous to our risk to our democracy. Speaker 1: This is extremely dangerous to our democracy. Speaker 0: This is extremely dangerous to our democracy. This is extremely dangerous to our democracy.
The Mockingbird Mainstream Media - The Illusion of Choice Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci rumble.com

@MJTruthUltra - UltraMJTruth

“Covid Surges” were the cause of all the draconian lockdowns we experienced. Those “surges” were determined by something called a PCR test. The powers that be behind this plandemic knew that in order to maintain the constant fearporn of high cases, they decided to use the PCR test. Three Videos for your Review: 1.) This video summarizes how the PCR tests were weaponized against healthy individuals to exaggerate millions of case numbers. In a nutshell, the sample you provided is magnified by each Cycle Threshold (CT’s) A sick person with a viral load can successfully be picked up at 7 CTs. The recommended amplification of a sample is not to exceed >30 CT’s. However, a lot of labs ran everyones samples through 38-40 CT’s, which equated to millions of false positive Covid-cases… The “Experts” then began their campaign to convince everyone that asymptomatic people were spreading Covid. https://rumble.com/v3bnnni-share-with-anyone-who-wants-to-get-a-pcr-test-to-tell-them-if-they-have-cov.html 2.) Kary Mullis, the man who invented the PCR test, who was also a 1993 Nobel Prize winner in Chemistry… Said himself… “PCR, if you do it well, you can find almost anything in anybody… It allows you to take a minuscule amount of anything & make it measurable..” Mr. Mullis unfortunately died in 2019, before the Plandemic. Very coincidental… Kary Mullis Video https://rumble.com/v3bnr9s-kary-mullis-inventor-of-the-pcr-test-you-can-find-anything-in-anybody.html 3.) Anthony Fauci himself admitted that running Cycle Thresholds greater than 35 will almost always result in dead nucleotides of past sicknesses. This is very important to understand why there were so many “cases”. The media ran with it and never stopped. Fauci Video https://rumble.com/v3bnpb0-dr-anthony-fauci-admits-the-pcr-tests-are-useless-if-ran-at-high-thresholds.html

Video Transcript AI Summary
The PCR test, used to determine COVID-19 cases, amplifies RNA fragments to detect the virus. However, the high amplification can also detect traces of dead virus or remnants from other coronaviruses. Scientists recommend not testing over 30 cycle thresholds to avoid false positives. When labs reduced the cycles, case numbers significantly decreased. False positives can occur almost half the time, especially in populations with low COVID-19 prevalence. In the past, PCR tests have caused false epidemics. The test requires skilled technicians and careful handling, but it is currently being conducted on a large scale with hastily trained personnel. Therefore, it is important to question the accuracy of reported case numbers.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So you know all those case numbers we see? They're based on the PCR test. Just how reliable is it? SARS CoV 2, like many other viruses, contains genetic material called RNA. RNA fragments are so small, they're difficult to detect. The PCR test doubles the fragments in what are called cycle thresholds and keeps doubling them until they have enough genetic material to identify. Most labs go up to 38 or 40 cycles, cycles, which means an amplification of 1 trillion times. But is that too much amplification? Because while live virus is present in people who are actually sick, traces of dead virus are present in people who used to be sick even months later or in people who were exposed to a virus, virus, but their body cleared it and they never got sick at all. They're not infectious. Genuinely sick people get a positive test in relatively few cycles because they have a high hide viral load. But the samples of people who are recovered or exposed have to be magnified billions of times to get a positive result. That's why scientists are recommending not testing over 30 cycle thresholds. So what would happen to case numbers if labs cut back to 30? At one New York lab, it resulted in a 63% case reduction. When a Massachusetts lab did the same, almost 90% of their cases disappeared. And that's not the only way that PCR tests can go wrong. They can also misidentify remnants from the other 6 human coronavirus types add SARS CoV 2. Speaker 1: And in fact, if you're testing in a population that doesn't have very much COVID, you'll get false positives Almost half the time, the person actually doesn't have COVID. They have something else. They may have nothing. Speaker 0: In 2007, PCR tests caused a pseudoepidemic for whooping cough at a hospital in New Hampshire. 100% of the results were false positives. Speaker 2: Because if you can model amplify 1 single molecule Up to to something that you can really measure, which BCR can do, then there's just very few molecules that you don't have at least 1 single one of them in your body. Speaker 0: This is a delicate test that's supposed to be done by highly skilled technicians in a Darryl Lab, yet it's currently being done on a massive expedited scale with hastily trained technicians working on huge numbers of tests. So the next time you see case numbers, ask yourself how many of them aren't cases at all.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers discuss the misuse of PCR in estimating viral RNA. They explain that PCR can detect almost anything in the body, making it easy to find even rare viruses like HIV. However, they argue that testing for HIV specifically is unnecessary because individuals with HIV are likely to have other viruses as well. They emphasize that PCR is a quantitative tool that provides measurable information, but it does not determine sickness or the potential harm of a virus. The speakers also mention that PCR cannot differentiate between virus particles and active live viruses. Overall, they highlight the limitations and misinterpretations of PCR testing.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I want to ask this to Carrie. How do they misuse PCR to estimate all these so supposed free viral RNAs that may or may not be there? Speaker 1: Is this done? I think See, if you if you if you can say if if they wanted if they could find this virus in you at all. And with PCR, if you do it well, you can find almost anything in anybody. It starts making you believe in the amplify 1 single molecule up to something that you can really measure, which PCR can do, then there's just very few molecules that you don't have at least 1 single one of them in your body. Okay? So that could be thought of as a misuse of it just to claim that it's meaningful. But the real misuse of it is, is that you don't need to test for HIV. You don't need to test for the other 10,000 retroviruses that are unnamed also in the subject. See somebody that's got HIV, generally is going to have almost anything that you can test for, because they have definitely HIV is a fairly rare virus. There's only 1,000,000 of out of 250, 300,000,000 people in America that have that virus. So you have to get around, either your mother had to have it and pass it to you, or you have to really paying a lot of attention to people that do have it, is paying only attention to them and get a pretty good chance of getting it that way. It's hard to get it. But if you have it, there's a good chance you've also got a lot of other ones. Because you've been in the market where you've been, it's been possible for you to get a lot of is it it's to test for that one and say that has any special meaning is what I think is the problem. Not that PCR has been misused. It's like It's not an estimation of it's a really quantitative thing. It tells you something about nature little bit measurable and then talk about it in meetings and stuff like it is important. See that that that's not a misuse. That's just sort of a misinterpretation. Speaker 0: Even after all the these, PCR, this quantitative PCR, that if you just get down to a basic virological count, it's still 1 in a 1000 to 1 in 10,000, HIV in 1 to 1 in a 1000 1 in 500 to 1 in a 1000 T cells. Speaker 1: It is. There's very little of what they call HIV and what's been brought out here by Philpot and and and he said already. The measurement for it is not is not exact at all. It's not it's not as good as our measurement for things like apples. An apple is an apple. You know, you can get something that's kinda like, if you got enough things that look kinda like an apple, you stick them all together, you might think of it as an apple. But and HIV is like that. Those tests are all based on things that are invisible and they are the results are inferred in a sense. PCR is separate from that. It's just a process that's used to make a whole lot of something out of something. That's what it is. But it's not. It doesn't tell you that you're sick and it doesn't tell you that the thing you ended up with really was going to hurt you or anything like that. That's why it's not. Speaker 2: So even if you believe in HIV, it can't tell the difference between virus particles or active live virus. I mean, there's a lot of questions involvement. Guys, thank you very very much. I don't know what else I can say, but to, let you know that we will
Video Transcript AI Summary
If a PCR test has a cycle threshold (CT) of 35 or higher, the chances of it being replication competent are very low. So, if someone's PCR test has a CT of 37 or higher, it's unlikely that the virus can be cultured from it. In fact, even a CT of 36 may indicate that it's just dead nucleotides.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Right. Again, a good question. And what is now sort of, evolving into a bit of a standard that if you get a cycle threshold of 35 or more, that the chances of it being replication competent are miniscule. So that's a very important question. Somebody comes in, and they repeat their PCR, and it's like 37 cycle threshold. But you never you almost never can culture virus from a 37 threshold cycle. So I think if Somebody does come in with 37, 38, even 36. You gotta say, you know, it's just it's just dead nucleotides, period.
The PCR Test’s are Flawed Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci rumble.com
Kary Mullis - Inventor of the PCR Test “You can Find anything in Anybody” Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci rumble.com
Dr Anthony Fauci Admits the PCR Tests are Useless if Ran at High Thresholds Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci rumble.com

@MJTruthUltra - UltraMJTruth

I want to again highlight the Mainstream Media & their relentless psychological attacks on the unvaccinated… This should terrify you.. —— MSNBC • “You are the unvaccinated. You are the problem. It is the unvaccinated who are the problem, period, end of story. • “The anti-vaxer’s seem to have a thing for death & home remedies” • “The unvaccinated should be taxed. They should pay more for healthcare.” —— CNN • “The only people you can blame, maybe they should be shamed, are the unvaccinated” • “Anyone you came into contact with, Will blame you, as will the rest of us.” • “It’s time to start blaming the unvaccinated folks” • “It’s the unvaccinated are the threat” • “You’re punishing the vaccinated for the sins of the vaccinated” • “You’re treading on our freedom, really you’re killing other people” • “You have to start doing things for the greater good of society and not for idiots who think they can do their own research.” • “Oh you can’t shame them.. you can’t call them stupid. Yes, they are.” • “We need to start looking at the choice to remain unvaccinated, the same while driving while intoxicated.” • “Literally, the only people dying are the unvaccinated, and for those spreading misinformation, shame on you.” —— OTHER MSM • “ We know we can’t trust the unvaccinated” • “The vaccinated feel the unvaccinated are making me feel upset or angry” • “No, screw your Freedom” • “When are we going to stop putting up with the idiots of this country and say it’s mandatory to get vaccinated. F*ck their freedom • Fauci said our hospitals are overwhelmed… “It’s not complicated to me… Vaccinated person who suffered a heart attack, come on in…. Unvaccinated person who gobbled horse goo, rest in peace weezy” —— JOE BIDEN - The p[R]esident • “We’ve been patient… but our patience is wearing thin. • “It’s not about freedom or personal choice” • “Those who are not vaccinated will end up paying the price” This Video https://rumble.com/v2nr2ry-the-unvaccinated-are-scum.html

Video Transcript AI Summary
The video features various speakers expressing their frustration and blame towards the unvaccinated. They argue that the unvaccinated are the problem and should be shamed for their choices. The vaccinated are being asked to wear masks to protect the unvaccinated, which is seen as a moral obligation. Some speakers believe that mandatory vaccination is necessary, while others criticize the unvaccinated for endangering lives and being ignorant. There is a call for the unvaccinated to be taxed and treated similarly to drunk drivers. The video concludes with the assertion that every COVID death could have been prevented if everyone had been vaccinated.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You are the unvaccinated. You are the problem. It is the unvaccinated who are the problem, period. End of story. Speaker 1: The only people that you can blame the only people you can blame this isn't shaming. This is the truth. Maybe they should be shamed by the unvaccinated. Speaker 2: Just have to start Blaming the unvaccinated folks, not the regular folks. Speaker 1: Anyone you came into contact with will blame you as will the rest of us who've done the right thing by getting vaccinated. Speaker 3: Because frankly, we know that we can't trust the unvaccinated. I think Speaker 2: it's Time to get our moral house in order, Anderson. It's the unvaccinated who are the threat. Speaker 0: All these vaccinated folks are gonna start wearing masks To protect the unvaccinated folks. It's called a Christian value. Speaker 4: They're basically punishing the vaccinated, for the the sins of the unvaccinated. Speaker 3: People are not behaving honorably. The unvaccinated are basically saying, Well, it's open season for me. I can do whatever I want as well. Speaker 5: The the unvaccinated are basically beating their breasts running around the country Saying, We don't care. We're living free and so forth. Speaker 6: We've been patient, but our patience is wearing thin. Speaker 7: Unvaccinated, A group that includes children and people acting like children. And the rest of us are starting to get pissed off. Speaker 8: The vaccinated feel the unvaccinated are Making me upset or angry. Speaker 6: This is not about freedom or personal choice. Speaker 2: Well, my freedom is being kind of disturbed here. No. Screw your freedom. Speaker 4: The other day, Howard Stern weighed in with a much different approach. Speaker 2: Take a look. Speaker 9: When are we gonna stop putting up with the idiots in this country And just say, you know, it's mandatory to get vaccinated. Their freedom. Speaker 10: But you're treading on our freedom, Speaker 4: and you're making Other people say, really, you're killing other people. The anti vaxxers, they seem to have a thing for death and home remedies. Speaker 6: The anti maskers turned anti vaxxers are Not just putting their own lives at risk. If that was the issue, we could just say that we can watch them compete to win place their show in the Darwin Awards. Speaker 1: We have to start doing things for the greater good of society and not for idiots who think that they can do their own research. And don't get me started on the lunatics who won't take any of the COVID vaccines Speaker 2: Life is too short to be an ass. Life is way too short to be ignorant of the promise of something that is Helping people worldwide. Speaker 11: Maybe you're doing it because, you're you're disconnected or disorganized. Maybe you have some sympathetic psychological reasons, But maybe you're just being antisocial. Speaker 1: Oh, you can't shame them. You can't call them stupid. You can't call them silly. Yes. They are. Speaker 6: Those who are not vaccinated will end up paying the price. The unvaccinated should be taxed. They should pay more for health care. Speaker 3: We need to start looking At the choice to remain unvaccinated, the same as we look at driving while intoxicated. Speaker 2: We're gonna see, and I've said, almost Mhmm. 2 types of America. Speaker 5: Doctor Fauci said that if hospitals get any more overcrowded, they're gonna have to make some very tough choices about who gets an ICU. But I don't that choice doesn't seem so tough to me. Person having a heart attack, yes. Come right on in. We'll take care of you. Unvaccinated guy who gobbled horse goo, rest in peace, Wheezy. Speaker 0: Pointing back to the unvaccinated Who are really creating a problem in this country. Every death that we are seeing from COVID could have Been prevented. Speaker 8: Literally, the only people dying are the unvaccinated. And for those of you spreading misinformation, shame on you. Speaker 7: Shame on you. I don't know how some of you sleep at
The Unvaccinated are Scum Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci rumble.com

@MJTruthUltra - UltraMJTruth

October 18, 2019, something called EVENT 201 took place in New York, NY. EVENT 201 was a Tabletop Pandemic Simulation of a Coronavirus that escaped & killed 60 million people, sponsored by the WHO, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, World Economic Forum, John’s Hopkins Center for Security, & the CIA. Covid was announced 6 weeks after this tabletop exercise. Is that a coincidence? This Clip https://rumble.com/v1ovvf0-the-real-anthony-fauci-event-201-the-pandemic-simulation-in-2019.html RDK’s Full Documentary can be found by searching for “The Real Anthony Fauci Documentary” Online.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Today's video is about a simulation called event two zero one, which simulated meetings of a group called the Pandemic Emergency Board. The simulation was sponsored by the World Economic Forum, Johns Hopkins School for Security, and funded by NIH and Gates. The video discusses the importance of communication and combating disinformation during a pandemic. It also mentions the need for governments to take unprecedented actions and the potential for a severe global pandemic. The simulation took place before the first reported case of coronavirus in Wuhan, China. It highlights the strain on healthcare systems, the need for a vaccine, and the shortage of medical supplies.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Today, I will be your master Today, I will be Speaker 1: your master of ceremonies for event two zero one. Speaker 2: Today's scenario is going to simulate meetings of a multi stakeholder group called the Pandemic Emergency Board. This Ford has been urgently convened by the World Economic Forum. Speaker 3: In October of 2019, You have a tabletop simulation that is sponsored by Foundation, the World Economic Forum, Johns Hopkins School For Security, which is funded by NIH and Gates. The major host include not only Gates but also April Haines, who is the former Deputy Director of the CIA. So what is the CIA Doing, hosting a simulation on public health. The CIA is not a public health agency. It is An intelligence agency that does not do public health. Speaker 4: The line between disinformation and misinformation is not always an easy one to find that we shouldn't be trying to Control Communication but rather flood the zone. And I certainly seen the value of communicating constantly on these issues, so as to continue To deal with, you know, sort of the vacuum that can be created in this circumstance. All of the disinformation that will be put out, it's going to be important to actually have a response to those There are also intelligence sources identifying multiple foreign disinformation campaigns. Speaker 5: Governments need to be willing to do things that Are out of their historical perspective or for the most part it's really a war footing that we need to be on. Speaker 6: It can happen quickly, a Marshall Type plan, probably you may say that exactly, but a Marshall Plan, it can go into effect and stimulate change Very quick. The distrust relates to the health system more generally. Speaker 1: A step up from the part of the government on enforcement actions against fake news. Speaker 7: I think a couple of therapy. Things we have to consider are even before this began, the anti vaccine movement was very strong and this is something specifically through social media that is spread. So as We move forward, obviously, trust in pharmaceuticals and government is very important at this moment. Speaker 3: The simulation is a simulation Of a coronavirus that has escaped and ends up killing the 60,000,000 people around the planet. The Chinese government knew they escaped the virus by September 12, 2019. Curiously, Who is there is George Gao, who is the head of the Chinese CDC. At that time, George Gao almost certainly knew the coronavirus circulating. Speaker 2: Infected people got a respiratory illness with symptoms ranging from mild flu like signs of ceremony. The sickest required intensive care, many die. It's spreading rapidly throughout local communities. International travel has turned local epidemics into a pandemic spanning the globe. There are now Speaker 8: more than 30,000 reported cases. Experts warn this may be just the beginning of a global problem. Speaker 2: More than half of the recognized cases have fired hospital care creating a huge strain on health care systems. The fatality rate is about 10%. Because it appears the virus is readily transmitted through the air from person to person, essentially, all people are susceptible. Experts agree unless it is quickly controlled, it could lead to a severe pandemic, an outbreak that circles the globe, and affects people everywhere. 2 to 4 times more lethal than the 1918 influenza pandemic, the worst pandemic on record. Even so, some people only exhibit mild flu like symptoms not requiring treatment in the hospital. Alarmingly, those people are able to walk around and spread the virus not realizing they are doing so. Even worse, International travelers have been arriving at their destinations symptom free, but within a matter of hours, becoming ill. Travel related cases have blossomed into outbreaks in a number of locations and have quickly grown faster than health Authorities could respond Speaker 8: and contain them. I'm joined by immunologist, doctor Evani Bello, and doctor Raelia Blakey, an epidemiologist, both highly respected in their field. Speaker 1: Researchers are working on a vaccine. Even if we discover a good vaccine candidate, We're starting from scratch, and it takes time to test safety and efficacy, typically years. Speaker 2: We simply cannot rely on these old time lines and processes. With enough money and political will, anything is possible. Speaker 8: Our US affiliate has just released Polling results and public expectations for a vaccine. A majority of Americans expect a vaccine to be available within 2 months, and 65% of those polled are eager to take the vaccine even if it's experimental. In related news, a significant demand for personal protective equipment, like n of equipment like N95 masks and gloves are on the rise due to the pandemic. However, globally, hospitals are running low. Ceremony. Other critical medical supplies such as saline and antibiotics are dwindling. Countries and companies are reportedly stockpiling supplies, disrupting health care supply chains, causing dangerous shortages in many parts of the world. Speaker 5: What you just witnessed were highlights from event two zero one. This pandemic simulation exercise of the coronavirus took place about 6 weeks before the first Illness from the coronavirus was actually reported in Wuhan, China. Now the simulation also includes news reports which were fabricated just for this
The Real Anthony Fauci: Event 201, the Pandemic Simulation in 2019 Watch the Full FILM HERE https://rumble.com/v1ovda8-the-real-anthony-fauci-documentary-part-1.html Truth Seeker in my Spare Time Telegram is my home base of Operations— follow me at t.me/candlesinthen rumble.com

@MJTruthUltra - UltraMJTruth

In 2017, Anthony Fauci made “prediction” that Trumps administration will have to deal with a “Surprise outbreak” How did he know? https://rumble.com/v1f3sn7-anthony-fauci-predicts-there-will-be-a-surprise-outbreak-in-trumps-administ.html

Video Transcript AI Summary
I have served in 5 administrations and want to share my perspective on pandemic preparedness. Based on my experience, I want to emphasize that the coming administration will face challenges in dealing with infectious diseases. This includes both chronic diseases and unexpected outbreaks. The history of the last 32 years as the director of NIAID shows that there is no doubt the next administration will have to confront these challenges.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Given, as you heard from the introduction, that I have been around for a while and have had the opportunity and and the privilege and the pleasure of serving in 5 administrations, I thought I would bring that perspective to the topic today is the issue of pandemic, preparedness. And if there's 1 message that I want to leave with you today based on my experience, and you'll see that in a moment, is that there is no question that there will be a challenge, the coming administration in the arena of infectious diseases, both chronic infectious diseases in the sense of already ongoing disease, and we have certainly a large burden of that, but also there will be a surprise outbreak. There will be a surprise outbreak. There will be a surprise outbreak. And I hope by the end of my relatively short presentation, you will understand why history the history of the last 32 years that I've been the director of NIAID will tell the next administration that there's no doubt in anyone's mind that they will be faced with the challenges that their predecessors
Anthony Fauci “Predicts” There will be a Surprise Outbreak in Trumps Administration- 01/10/2017 Dr. Anthony Fauci “Predicts” There will be a Surprise Outbreak in Trumps Administration- January 10, 2017 Truth Teller in my Spare Time Telegram is my home base of Operations— follow me at t.me/candle rumble.com

@MJTruthUltra - UltraMJTruth

October 23, 2022 The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, in partnership with WHO and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, along with the CIA conducted a tabletop Catastrophic Contagion exercise at the Grand Challenges Annual Meeting in Brussels, Belgium. This “exercise” pandemic is deadlier than the coronovirus and SPECIFICALLY TARGETS CHILDREN! “As of today, there have been an estimated 1 billion cases worldwide with more than 20 million deaths, including nearly 15 million children. Countless millions are alive, but left with paralysis or brain damage,” says GNN, the fake news agency from the exercise. TODAY— Now we’re hearing about an even “deadlier variant” and upcoming lockdowns again in the fall… Joe Biden just announced “New Vaccines” for the new variant. Is that a coincidence? This video https://rumble.com/v206rpy-johns-hopkins-who-and-gates-foundation-simulate-a-catastrophic-contagion-th.html The exercise https://www.centerforhealthsecurity.org/our-work/exercises/2022-catastrophic-contagion/

Video Transcript AI Summary
Latin American countries alerted the WHO of outbreaks of a new infectious disease that could cause a severe pandemic if containment and mitigation efforts fail. Pandemics are political, financial, and global health risks. National leadership is crucial, along with support for local and national responses, training, and regional solidarity. Communication is key, involving scientists, social, religious, and political leaders. Trust is essential and needs to be rebuilt among countries, populations, and healthcare systems. The WHO should strengthen its role as a voice for the voiceless. Over a billion cases and 20 million deaths, including 15 million children, have been reported worldwide. Pandemic preparedness and response teams were established, but more countries should have participated. Lessons learned should be applied to future pandemics.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Officials in 2 Latin American countries alerted the WHO of several outbreaks of a new infectious disease that's the the the the the the the the the the the the the the the the Speaker 1: the the the the the the the the the the the the the the the the the the the the the the the the the the the the the the the the the the the the the the Speaker 0: the the the the the the the the the reported: the virus could cause a severe pandemic if early containment and mitigation efforts are not successful. Speaker 2: The pandemic In this type of situation and trend, would be a risk for the global health security. Pandemics are inherently political, financial and so much broader. Speaker 3: We have not spoken on the leadership in the country. And I think that we need to be also very careful. We cannot decide a lot of things without the leaders be involved and agree on that. Speaker 2: There is no substitute for national leadership. It's important to support the local response or Speaker 4: the national response. Training those that Speaker 2: are in these areas first, enabling them with the tools, protecting them. And it needs the regional solidarity first. Speaker 4: At this stage, communication is key. And communication should include not just scientists with data but also social, religious and political leaders. Speaker 2: Trust. This is an essential issue. And Trust was broken among countries, between populations and health care systems, between health care Speaker 3: I'm very sorry to say that in 2025, we need to strengthen the WHO needs to be a voice for the voiceless? Speaker 5: As of today, there have been an estimated one 1,000,000,000 cases worldwide with more than 20,000,000 deaths including nearly 15,000,000 children. Templest and trained for this moment years in advance. This included having full time pandemic preparedness and response teams which conducted detailed operational and routinely tested those plans through exercises and drills. If more countries had participated and heeded Speaker 6: I feel sad that the warnings about the pandemic were not heated enough, but I feel good that now the world will do the right thing so that the next pandemic Do the right thing so that the next pandemic, things will be good. It's a very sad thing, but we have to take advantage of The innovations that it helped highlight. Speaker 5: Well, thank you so much.
Johns Hopkins, WHO, & Gates Foundation Simulate a Catastrophic Contagion that Targets Children! Truth Seeker in my Spare Time Telegram is my home base of Operations— follow me at t.me/candlesinthenight Truth Social at @MJTruth Gab https://gab.com/mjtruth ALL MY RUMBLE CHANNELS - Feel Goods https rumble.com
Catastrophic Contagion A pandemic tabletop exercise at the Grand Challenges Annual Meeting in Brussels, Belgium, on October 2022. catastrophiccontagion.centerforhealthsecurity.org

@MJTruthUltra - UltraMJTruth

Look who “predicted” another Pandemic in April 2023 Anthony Fauci… “There will absolutely be another outbreak of another pandemic.” This Video https://rumble.com/v2glmpu-anthony-fauci-there-will-absolutely-be-an-outbreak-of-another-pandemic..html

Video Transcript AI Summary
We must take action to prevent future pandemics as they are inevitable in the lifetimes of our grandchildren and great-grandchildren. The exact timing of the next outbreak is uncertain, but we need to be prepared.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We really wanna prevent the next pandemic, and there will be one. There will absolutely be an outbreak grandparent your grandchildren and your grandparent your grandchildren and your great grandchildren's lifetime. We don't know. So if we really
Anthony Fauci - “there will absolutely be an outbreak of another pandemic.” April 3, 2023 Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social htt rumble.com

@MJTruthUltra - UltraMJTruth

It wasn’t just Fauci…. May 2023, WHO Director General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus even gave his own “prediction” The next pandemic that will be ‘even deadlier’ than COVID is coming, warns WHO “The threat of another variant emerging that causes new surges of disease and death remains,” Tedros said. “And the threat of another pathogen emerging with even deadlier potential remains.” “When the next pandemic comes knocking — and it will — we must be ready to answer decisively, collectively and equitably,” He goes on to say how we need to hand over our sovereignty by agreeing to the Pandemic Accord. (I’ll cover this later in the thread) This Video https://rumble.com/v2pn9xa-the-next-pandemic-will-be-even-deadlier-than-covid-is-coming-warns-who.html

Video Transcript AI Summary
The end of COVID-19 as a global health emergency doesn't mean it's no longer a threat. The Global Strategic Preparedness and Response Plan for COVID-19 emphasizes the need for action in five core areas. We still face the risk of new variants causing more disease and death, as well as the potential emergence of deadlier pathogens. We can't ignore these challenges. We must make necessary changes now to be prepared for the next pandemic. The Pandemic Accord is a commitment to international cooperation and a shared response to future threats. It's a generational agreement that aims to prevent panic and neglect, ensuring a more resilient world.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The end of COVID nineteen as a global health emergency is not the end of COVID as a global health threat. Earlier this month, the Secretariat published the 4th edition of the Global Strategic Preparedness and Response Plan for COVID nineteen, which outlines critical actions for countries in 5 core areas. The threat of another variant emerging that causes new surges of disease and death remains. And the threat of another pathogen emerging with even deadlier potential remains. We cannot kick this can down the road. If we do not make the changes that must be made, then who will? And if we do not make them now, and when? When the next pandemic comes knocking, and it will, we must be ready to answer this time for enhanced international cooperation, the pandemic accord? A generational commitment that we will not go back to the old cycle of panic and neglect that left our world vulnerable, but moved forward with a shared commitment to meet shared threats with a shared response. That's why we say the Pandemic Accord is a generational agreement.
The next pandemic will be ‘even deadlier’ than COVID is coming, warns WHO Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci rumble.com

@MJTruthUltra - UltraMJTruth

Before I get too ahead of myself, let’s talk again about “Covid Cases” Without “cases”, there is no need for lockdowns. Without “cases”, there is no Pandemic… One of the biggest mysteries of the Plandemic was the fact that the Flu completely disappeared… According to CDC & WHO data, as well as scientific journals, since November 2020, the drop-off in flu numbers following COVID’s arrival was swift and global, which caused a less than 1% positivity rate. What the “Fact Checkers” Say… • The Flu Vaccines were very effective that year, that’s why… • Due to Covid, staying home, social distancing, washing our hands, wearing masks slowed the spread of the flu…. Me— Ok…. If that worked for the flu, why didn’t it work for Covid? The logic doesn’t add up.. https://google.com/amp/s/www.scientificamerican.com/article/flu-has-disappeared-worldwide-during-the-covid-pandemic1/%3famp=true…

Flu Has Disappeared for More Than a Year Scientific American is the essential guide to the most awe-inspiring advances in science and technology, explaining how they change our understanding of the world and shape our lives. scientificamerican.com

@MJTruthUltra - UltraMJTruth

VAERS Data A nurse friend of mine, who was terrified of losing her job, brought this to my attention… She didn’t want to lose her job, but she didn’t want to get the vaccines either due of all of the adverse effects she saw in those who did get vaccinated early. She was also very familiar with something called VAERS and what she saw terrified her. VAERS is the primary mechanism in the U.S. for reporting adverse vaccine reactions. According to the VAERS website, healthcare providers are required by law to report to VAERS. Sadly, fewer than 1% of adverse events have ever been reported to VAERS… but… and this is a very big but…. That 1% tells quite a terrifying story. VAERS began recording data in 1990 of ALL vaccine adverts events. Notice the difference in numbers in every single category, by year… Let’s Go Over a Few Categories: DEATHS: • 2021- 22,277 deaths were reported. • 2022- 12,462 deaths were reported • 2023, As of Today- 2,472 deaths have been reported. — Compare the Years prior. — If these numbers represent only a 1% reporting rate, do some math on what the possible real number could be. Check for Yourself https://www.openvaers.com/covid-data/mortality MYOCARDITIS/PERICARDITIS: • 2021- 15,710 incidents reported • 2022- 10,604 incidents reported • 2023 as of Today- 1,372 incidents reported so far — Compare the Years prior. — If these numbers represent only a 1% reporting rate, do some math on what the possible real number could be. Check for Yourself https://www.openvaers.com/covid-data/myo-pericarditis MISCARRIAGES & STILLBIRTHS: • 2021- 3,427 incidents reported • 2022- 1,525 incidents reported • 2023- As of Today- 188 incidents reported Check for yourself https://www.openvaers.com/covid-data/reproductive-health MENSTRUAL: • 2021- 27,799 incidents reported • 2022- 16,214 incidents reported • 2023- As of Today- 1,945 incidents reported — Compare the Years prior. — If these numbers represent only a 1% reporting rate, do some math on what the possible real number could be. — Women everyone bagn experiencing menstrual issues after being vaccinated, which prompted hundreds of thousands of women to create groups on Facebook. One of the groups was reported to have 40k+ members… Ultimately, Facebooks “Covid-19 Misinformation Policy” reportedly took these groups down & Facebook even began removing individual posts. https://amp.theguardian.com/technology/2021/feb/08/facebook-bans-vaccine-misinformation Check for yourself https://www.openvaers.com/covid-data/reproductive-health Every single category on the VAERS website is just like this. What was the one common denominator that occurred worldwide around the time of these spikes? The vaccines…

Mortality - OpenVAERS openvaers.com
Myo/Pericarditis - OpenVAERS openvaers.com
Reproductive Health - OpenVAERS openvaers.com
Facebook bans misinformation about all vaccines after years of controversy Company will remove posts with false claims about vaccines on Facebook and Instagram amp.theguardian.com
Reproductive Health - OpenVAERS openvaers.com

@MJTruthUltra - UltraMJTruth

If those numbers don’t terrify you, this will… What if It was far worse? Many of those adverse events talked about in the above post are not even reported because the CDC did something truly sinister. According to the CDC, a person is not considered fully vaccinated until after two weeks of their last recommended dosage. https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2021/p0402-travel-guidance-vaccinated-people.html Click on any category on VAERS… Look at the spike in numbers following inoculation. https://www.openvaers.com/covid-data Let’s focus on just one of these Categories in VAERS: 👉 Deaths The CDC denies that these deaths are related to C19 vaccines, but their own data as well as VAERS data shows approximately 50 percent of all deaths occurred within 48-hours of vaccination. 2+2=4 Here’s the kicker— Everyone that died within that two week window (after being vaccinated) were considered an unvaccinated death. Do you understand what I just said? The CDC’s claim that an individual is not fully vaccinated until after two weeks of their final shot, exonerates them from all vaccine related harm that occurred within that two week window, while additionally serving to inflate the numbers.

CDC Newsroom CDC public health news, press releases, government public health news, medical and disease news, story ideas, photos. cdc.gov
COVID Vaccine Data - OpenVAERS openvaers.com

@MJTruthUltra - UltraMJTruth

It gets worse… These slides are from an FDA document “Vaccines & Related Biological Products Advisory Committee October 22, 2020” and provides a list of possible adverse reactions to be expected with the C19 vaccines. FDA Document https://fda.gov/media/143557/download In a nutshell, the FDA expected & projected the same adverse reactions from the C19 vaccines. The FDA even states they would be holding weekly & bi-weekly meetings on VAERS activities. This VAERS document from December 31, 2021 states: “The total number of deaths associated with the COVID-19 vaccines is more than double the number of deaths associated with all other vaccines combined since the year 1990.” https://vaersanalysis.info/2022/01/07/vaers-summary-for-covid-19-vaccines-through-12-31-2021/ If the FDA held weekly meetings on VAERS activities, you would this statement alone would set off alarms.. It never did…

FDA Error fda.gov
VAERS Summary for COVID-19 Vaccines through 12/31/2021 – VAERS Analysis vaersanalysis.info

@MJTruthUltra - UltraMJTruth

With the explosion of Myocarditis reports in young healthy adults & children that occurred after allowing children to be vaccinated, which is evident in the VAERS data… Pfizer ended up adding an Anti-Heart Attack Drug called Tromethamine for 5-11 year olds after thousands of cardiac disorders were seen in 12-17 year olds. The document also says, “The medicine may cause tissue damage if the drug leaks from the vain.“ along with a plethora of other effects. It appears they recognized the jab was causing heart attacks in children and swapped one ingredient with another to assist with the rise in heart attacks. They did all of this quietly… EUA Amendment Request for Pfizer-BioNTech Covid-19 Vaccine for Use in Children 5 Through 11 Years of Age October 26, 2021 https://fda.gov/media/153447/download

Video Transcript AI Summary
The EUA amendment request for the Pfizer BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine for children aged 5 to 11 reveals a change in the product formulation. Instead of using phosphate buffered saline, they now use tromethamine buffer, which is actually a heart attack drug. The document mentions potential side effects, including tissue damage if the drug leaks from the vein. This is concerning because the vaccine is supposed to be given intramuscularly, not intravenously. The side effects listed include allergic reactions, skin problems, breathing difficulties, and cardiovascular issues. The inclusion of another drug and the lack of attention to this matter is alarming. It seems like the rules are being changed without proper scrutiny, and now they are administering a dangerous blood thinner to children, which could lead to tissue damage.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: EUA amendment request for Pfizer BioNTech COVID nineteen vaccine for use in children 5 through 11 years old, dated October 26, 2021. So just before Halloween, they decided to sneak this through. Now if you go down to page 14 Now this is the incredible part. Yeah. This is it right here. So the product is the product. Formulation. To provide a vaccine with improved stability profile, the Pfizer Monotech COVID nineteen teen uses in children's 5 to 11, uses tromethamine buffer instead of phosphate buffered saline as used in previous formulations and excludes sodium chloride and potassium chloride. So there it is. But that's not a buffer. It's not a buffer. It's a literal heart attack drug, and that's what they claim here. So you go to drugs So again, they're doing all through changing definitions. They're just exactly how they change the definition of what a vaccine is. But here it is, Tromethamine, it's used to prevent acid problems in the blood. That doesn't sound like a buffer. That doesn't sound like saline solution when you think of saline solution. Now you go through, it says, well, it's not for newborns. That's one thing it says. But this is interesting. Some people may have very bad and sometimes deadly side effects when taking a drug. So there it is right there. And then it lists the different side effects that could happen. But this is what caught my eye more than anything. Medicine may cause tissue damage if drug links from the vein. Now why is that interesting? So when you and this is from my understanding of when nurses give these shots. They're supposed to give them into the muscle, not into the vein because if it gets in the vein, that's why you're having problems with these, blood clots and other heart problems and other blood disorders that people are going through. So and this says here, there's a problem if it leaks from the vein. It's supposed to be given intravenously, which is So they're mixing drugs that are contraintegrated. Exactly. And you can look at what the side effects are here, allergic reaction, rash, high blistered, peeling skin, trouble breathing, hoarseness, swelling, low blood sugar, shortness of breath, fever. But then there's another little you could go to more detail. Oh, and it has other ones, cardiovascular, chemical phlebitis, venospasms, cardiovascular. They say they're not frequently reported, but here they are, exfoliation tissue damage. And again, Rob, I want to continue with this, but here's the big issue. They're putting another drug with another drug and then burying it in a document. And nobody's talking about it. Yeah, yeah. That's the big thing. Nobody's talking about this. It's not, You have to go search through the 14 But it shows they blew up like, like, said in 2019, we're gonna blow the whole system up, do whatever you want. That's true. It's just mad scientists doing whatever they want. And all they have to do is a pandemic together, and then that gives them the excuse to do whatever they want and just change the rules. And now they're putting very dangerous blood thinner in children. Heptocellular necrosis. That's the tissue damage that that you're gonna see happen when they give this, vaccine to the kids.

@MJTruthUltra - UltraMJTruth

Medical Professionals Raised Alarms that Babies were Having HEART ATTACKS in the Wombs of Vaccinated Women - CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY! Prior to 2021, Intrauterine fetal demise (stillbirth) occurs when a child dies in the womb at or around the 20th week pregnancy— was extremely uncommon. 2021, the number of stillbirths explode… 1,200 fold increases… One single OBGYN was on track to see 9,000 high risk OB ultrasounds. • 1,200 fold increases in menstrual abnormalities • Miscarriages up • Birth defects up • Fetal cardiac arrhythmia up • Fetal malformations up • Reduction in amniotic fluid — Are you saying babies are having heart attacks in the womb? “Yes, The vaccines are causes a significant inflammatory effect.” March 1st, 2021 The FDA, under a federal judges order, began releasing data… one of these documents was a Post Marketing Analysis https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf This Document Outlined • 83% of all vaccinated pregnant women ended up with a dead baby • 274 Pregnancies, they couldn’t account for what happened to 238 of those pregnancies… the remaining pregnancies resulted in a dead baby… all but one single baby. Pfizer wanted these documents to come out 55 years later. Why??? Crimes Against Humanity! This Video https://rumble.com/v1wjpjy-the-vaccines-are-causing-babies-to-have-heart-attack-in-the-womb-crimes-aga.html Link For Video in Above Post (forgot to add) https://rumble.com/v3c4vdi-pfizer-quietly-adds-anti-heart-attack-drug-tromethamine-to-child-covid-shot.html

Video Transcript AI Summary
Before the vaccines, there were 1 to 2 fetal demises every 2-3 months. However, an email claimed that there were 22 fetal demises in just one month, with projections of increasing each month. A funeral home director mentioned that 5 out of 6 cases were vaccinated, and the other received remdesivir. There seems to be an increase in fetuses stored in refrigerators compared to previous years. A high-risk obstetrician with extensive experience noted a significant rise in stillbirth rates, with a rate of 29.3 per 1,000 live births. There have also been alarming numbers of dead fetuses, miscarriages, birth defects, and fetal cardiac issues. However, a safety monitoring system found no increased risks for pregnant women who received the vaccine. The birth rate in Hungary dropped by 20% after mass vaccinations began. A volunteer at a hospital was told not to come in as there were no babies being born. The speaker expresses concern about the potential rarity of seeing newborn babies due to the impact of the vaccine.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hello? Speaker 1: Hi, Michelle. This is Nick and Matthew. How are you? Speaker 0: I'm good. So before the vaccines came out, there were 1 to 2 fetal denises. Every 2 or 3 months, you would see I finally had enough when I got this email the other day. It said that there was a record of fetal demises and that there were 22 of them in 1 month. And in this email, it says that it's projected to increase each month. Speaker 2: The fetal demise in mothers gestational mothers in that 22 to 26 week period, I had a run of that in funeral home, and 5 of the 6 were vaccinated, the other had remdesivir, and They all lost their infants. Speaker 1: We're just seeing a fridge full of babies, but we're not actually doing the funeral. So that's a mystery to me as to Where these babies are going? So you're saying there's more fetuses in the refrigerators now than there was 2021. Yeah. I'm saying is more fetuses now in in in the refrigerator than I've seen ever before. Speaker 3: I've been doing high risk obstetrics for 43 years. I see a vast number of patients a year. I don't know of any other maternal fetal medicine physician in this country that sees as many patients as I do By ultrasound, at one point in time, this year, I was on track to see 9,000 high risk OB ultrasounds. So I know what's going on. And I've seen death and destruction like I've never seen before. The stillbirth rate Is measured in terms of live births per 1,000. And really it's come down in my career from about 10 to about Almost 5.8 or 6. Now let's go to 2021 and look at the stillbirth rate for Michelle's. This is horrifying. But if you take this death figure and you look at that rate at 29.3, That sigma that you're looking at is 40 plus Sigma, standard deviation. Let that sink in. This is from Waterloo, Canada. 83 still burst, about 4,000 deliveries. That exact same thing you saw with Michelle's. If that weren't bad enough, look at this. I couldn't even put it. There were 13 dead fetuses In 1 24 hour period, 1 20 4 hour period. 1200 fold in menstrual abnormalities. And then when we get into pregnancy, we're looking at a substantial increase in miscarriages, In birth defects, a substantial risk of fetal cardiac arrhythmia, fetal cardiac malformations, significant fetal growth slowing, Significant reduction in amniotic fluid, fetal cardiac arrest. Speaker 2: Are you saying babies are having heart attacks? Speaker 3: Yes. The vaccine causes a significant inflammatory effect. Speaker 4: Three different safety monitoring systems, again, they found no Significant safety signals for the mother or for the fetus because we have to remember in obstetrics, we're dealing with 2 patients. So no increased risks to be vaccinated while pregnant. Speaker 3: Anything that causes inflammation in my business, in my area of expertise causes damage, injury, Death and destruction in pregnancy. We've known that for half a century. Speaker 5: On March March first, the FDA released the 1st round of thousands of pages of data submitted by Pfizer for review of their COVID nineteen Vaccine. Speaker 6: It's the 5.3.6 post marketing analysis of the adverse events in which They outlined that 83% of all pregnant women who got vaccinated ended up with a dead baby. They had 2 70 pregnancies. They could not account for what happened to 238 of those pregnancies, and the remaining pregnancies resulted in a dead baby. Speaker 5: And originally, the documents were going to take 55 years to be released. But because of the court order, we'll get all of the documents Speaker 7: Thank you for the floor, Mr. President. Honorable National Assembly, In January this year, something happened that has not happened for decades. The birth rate fell by 20% compared to the line came just 9 months after the COVID mass vaccinations began in Hungary. Speaker 5: Now I will say a friend mind. She just told me this the other day. Her mother had volunteered at the hospital prior to COVID. So they called her and said, hey. Would you cut them back in and She volunteered obstetrics. Right? Babies. So she said, yeah. Alright. So they retrained her, and then they called her back and said, I guess there's no point you coming in. We're not having any babies born. Speaker 6: I never pass up an opportunity. When I see a newborn baby, I stop and I drink it in because my heart aches to think That seeing a newborn baby may become one of the rarest things. And and I want to be wrong. I hope I'm wrong. But so many people have taken this. There's nothing as close to seeing the face of god as seeing a newborn. And you have this evil that is is destroying
The Vaccines are Causing Babies to Have Heart Attacks in the Womb! CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY! Truth Seeker in my Spare Time Telegram is my home base of Operations— follow me at t.me/candlesinthenight Truth Social at @MJTruth Gab https://gab.com/mjtruth ALL MY RUMBLE CHANNELS - Feel Goods https rumble.com
Pfizer Quietly Adds Anti-Heart Attack Drug Tromethamine to Child Covid Shots - October 26, 2021 Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci rumble.com

@MJTruthUltra - UltraMJTruth

That’s it for the day …. I will update THIS THREAD again over the next few days. When it’s updated, this message will self-destruct. Stay Tuned! There’s a lot more. :)

Saved - September 18, 2023 at 6:50 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The disappearance of the flu for two consecutive years, replaced by COVID, raises questions about the effectiveness of measures like masks and lockdowns. If these measures truly eradicated the flu but failed to protect against COVID, it suggests testing fraud and a hidden agenda behind the pandemic. The link provides further information.

@Inversionism - Inversionism

Before anyone says another word about COVID, vaccine efficacy and booster shots, or a supposed impending pandemic going into the fall/winter, you need to explain to me in thorough scientifically substantiated detail exactly how the flu vanished for 2 years straight and was replaced by supposed COVID with equivalent numbers. If you claim it was masks, social distancing, hand sanitizer, lockdowns, or whatever other cope you have been told to believe, you need to provide an RCT demonstrating that it's efficacious enough to stop one of the most common viral illness for 2 years, but also not do anything to protect against COVID simultaneously. Until it's proven to me beyond any doubt that those measures made the flu vanish but didn't do anything for COVID, then I'm going to definitively declare that the entire COVID pandemic is predicated on RT-PCR and other testing fraud, and it was all a mass psyop to goad you into taking a bioweapon vaccine to make pharmaceutical companies billions of dollars, and perhaps some other nefarious intentions pertaining to fertility and depopulation agendas. Any takers? I'll wait.

Saved - November 7, 2023 at 1:16 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
In this theory, the author suggests that the disappearance of flu cases and positive flu tests was intentional. They believe that adverse effects and immune suppression caused by the flu shot were becoming harder to hide. The government and pharmaceutical industry may have welcomed the focus on COVID shots to divert attention from flu shot problems. The author also highlights the similarities between COVID and flu practices, such as PCR testing and tracking vaccination status. They question the impact of the flu shot on mortality and suggest that a "bad flu shot season" could have significant consequences. The article concludes by mentioning the possibility of a manufactured pandemic to hide other deaths and the effectiveness of propaganda campaigns.

@Wood_House76 - Jessica Hockett

THEORY ALERT: This is part of my still-in-progress theory arising from study of the Alleged Disappearance of Flu (The Flu-lusion). Documenting here for the record. In summary, I believe flu/positive flu tests temporarily, intentionally disappeared because they needed to be. Why? I believe the flu shot & unethical experimentation therewith was creating mortality problems in the form of adverse effects & immune-suppression that could no longer be hidden in other causes of death. In many ways, the things that are being said of the COVID shot had also been problems with the flu shot, for different reasons. IMO, the govt and Pharma is more-than-okay with the focus on the COVID shot probs -- because "emergency," dontchaknow? What they don't want is for people to look back at the flu shot probs, or realize that the flu shot & the goal for a universal vax goals were a big impetus for Operation COVID. What problems am I referring to? Not mass death per se, but deaths in children and the elderly that were getting hard to hide in and get attributed to other natural causes. These were a threat to a) Investments into respective - but increasingly mashed-up -- pandemic and bioterrorism/disaster planning efforts that needed to be "realized." You need to you make good on your *A Pandemic is Coming* prognostications. TONS of political & financial fuel had been invested into that enterprise. b) A Universal flu/respiratory shot ("One Shot to Rule Them All"), which complemented goals for various population surveillance desires. "Disease surveillance" is an effectively a form of citizen surveillance. Lots of "lessons learned" from those decades-long programs that are super useful for that health passport/Global l Control/One Govt thing that certain Elites and Borderless Entities are so interested in. "They" COULD NOT have people suspecting the flu shot is harmful, killing anyone, exacerbating ILI, etc. The flu shot changes every year and folks take it on faith that getting a shot and still getting sick is just a wrong guess. Pretty awe$ome. SARS and H1N1 2009 showed that it's pretty easy to create the appearance of sudden spread through PCR testing and panic pushing. You can even get people to take a new shot that way. The harder part, of course, is getting people to suddenly die on a scale that would convince them there's a Global Pandemic Emergency.

@Wood_House76 - Jessica Hockett

Related. Threading these for my purposes https://x.com/Wood_House76/status/1710745807450784137?s=20

@Wood_House76 - Jessica Hockett

Since ppl are talking about the "other" shot lately, I want make 3 points that build on seasonal data from Chicago (graph below). 1) There is no bigger racket than the flu shot. ▪️Changes every year ▪️Uptake fairly high (in the U.S.) ▪️Kids were roped in to the operation ▪️Widely acknowledged to not work well for the elderly (including by the CDC's flu expert) ▪️No one questions whether it has adverse effects, whether it causes/worsens respiratory illness, or can be deadly ▪️ People equate "not working" with "they guessed the wrong strain this year" Sounds like a cash cow, right? Imagine it wasn't simply "not working" but making things worse? Imagine you need a new platform because all your messing around with the shot since 2009 is getting out of hand but you can only hide it for so long. Imagine people aren't scared of flu but you've got those universal flu shot goals and all that investment in pandemic planning? What would you do? 2) Many things that have been "done with" SARS-CoV-2/COVID were already being done with influenza, on a smaller scale. It wasn't new on the scene in 2020. That includes but is not limited to ▪️PCR testing ▪️labeling ICU hospitalizations as flu associated based on a test result ▪️tracking vaccination status ▪️influenza-positive pneumonia deaths The idea that these practices in the COVID Era are mistakes, brand new to the people asked to apply them, etc. is incorrect. You don't "suddenly" foist these things on state/local public health agencies, healthcare workers, etc. You till the soil and leverage preexisting systems and practices. 3) The COVID shot/boosters/combo shots are not the only injections in the 2020-2023 mix. There has been widespread use of sedatives (for "calming" care home residents and people in ambulances, for putting people on vents) AND the flu shot. Where's all cause mortality by flu shot status, I wonder? Where's all mortality by flu shot & COVID shot status? It seems people who do good work trying to tease out COVID shot problems are either forgetting or ignoring the flu shot, as though it doesn't matter. In my opinion, starting the timeline in March 2020 or December 2020 is a mistake. Limiting one's view to Virus From Wuhan and COVID shots is also a mistake. Thank you for coming to my TED Talk.

@Wood_House76 - Jessica Hockett

Right. You need a decoy - i.e., an already-circulating, unremarkable pathogen co-opted from the background/existing landscape that can be used to launch the new platform you need AND can hide the excess that had been occurring that season. "Push forward" "Probable deaths" https://x.com/MariamAzeb/status/1712159023359795571?s=20

@MariamAzeb - Azeb Mariam🌷

@Wood_House76 The hard part is to hide the vaccine failure and implement the new platform.

@Wood_House76 - Jessica Hockett

You also need a term for the operation that can be used to code deaths over a longer period - and also have a public-facing meaning linked to the pathogen type. The ICD codes U07.1/U07.2 is COVID-19. (U07.2 isn't used in the U.S., as far as we're told.) In addition to the public-facing definition given by Tedros on Feb 11, 2020, COVID could mean Covert Operation for Virus-Initiated Disaster Coordinated Operation on Vaccine-Induced Disease Condition Of Vaccine Induced Disease Condition of Virus Induced Disease CoVert [&] OVert Infectious Diseases (a term already in scientific literature) https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8102300/#:~:text=Covert%20infections%20occur%20when%20bees,have%20a%20greatly%20curtailed%20lifespan. Coronavirus, Opioid, and Viral Infections Disaster Coronavirus, Opioid, and Viral Infections Deaths You need a term that isn't explicitly linked to the detection of a single virus, can change over time, and is "defensible" to posterity (e.g., "See? These WERE COVID deaths.")

The Effect of Covert and Overt Infections on Disease Dynamics in Honey-Bee Colonies Viral diseases of honey bees are important economically and ecologically and have been widely modelled. The models reflect the fact that, in contrast to the typical case for vertebrates, invertebrates cannot acquire immunity to a viral disease, so they ... ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

@Wood_House76 - Jessica Hockett

I suspect that what The Overlords fear most is that people will stop taking seasonal shots AND that nothing will happen as a result. Shorter term, we're dealing with all kinds of fallout. But imagine what would happen if it's shown that a "bad flu season" was a "bad flu shot season" - and not in the way people think? Yikes. https://x.com/h_robbins/status/1712161017533517912?s=20

@h_robbins - 🔥H🔥

@Wood_House76 My wife had a dramatic series of adverse reactions she'd never had before from the flu shot she took prior to Covid being officially in the US. Very similar to the neurological issues people are seeing with the Covid shots now. Debilitating vertigo, migraines, anxiety, etc.

@Wood_House76 - Jessica Hockett

P.S. Not a natural event. ⬇️ And not 100% the speed or magnitude of the deadly iatrogenic measures we know we taken when “15 days to slow the spread” was declared. What do you do with deaths you want to hide — deaths from other time periods (and maybe other location )? You manufacture the Pandemic Spike of 1918 on steroids. Because your hubris knows no bounds and you don’t expect anyone to call your bluff.

@Wood_House76 - Jessica Hockett

Bergamo, Italy https://open.substack.com/pub/woodhouse/p/three-cities-same-virus?r=jjay2&utm_medium=ios&utm_campaign=post Also not a natural event, and I would like to know more about this ⬇️

Three Cities, Same Virus? The spring 2020 daily death curves of Bergamo province, New York, and Chicago raise questions about whether the events can be reasonably blamed on sudden spread of the same pathogen. woodhouse76.com

@Wood_House76 - Jessica Hockett

⬇️

@Wood_House76 - Jessica Hockett

Now putting the death spike in. Seriously, was Bergamo attacked? Did the province experience an earthquake with aftershocks? There is nothing about this that says "disease-spread" event. https://t.co/MxQvI29agh

@Wood_House76 - Jessica Hockett

Adding on https://x.com/Wood_House76/status/1720878406911308068?s=20

@Wood_House76 - Jessica Hockett

ANOTHER ANGLE ON FLU SHOT PROBS AS A CATALYST FOR OPERATION COVID-19. Consider: Is it possible The Powers That Be been slowly losing control of the flu shot program since the 2009 🐖 component & their insistence on everyone (including kids) needing a flu shot? Is it possible there was cumulative damage, with the snowball getting bigger and bigger, to the point where it could no longer be hidden or controlled. Had a dead end been reached, with a need to change tactics? They could have/should have been been semi-honest with the public & said something like, "For reasons beyond control, influenza immunization is no longer providing adequate protection/was immunosuppressive; therefore, manufacturing processes would have to be changed immediately." But then who would foot the bill on the injured? Who would have been blamed or held responsible? The 2017-2018 season was a wake-up call, I'll bet. How much of Gottlieb's 'concession' about One Shot #goals back then was an act is hard to say. What I'm more sure of (though not certain) is that GoF, look-at-China is a ruse to distract from Flu Shot Probs. My view is still that "SARS-CoV-2" is something that was already out there/in us and was used as a decoy to off-ramp the egg-based approach and on-ramp mRNA. The U.S. isn't the only country at the helm of the Global Flu Surveillance Racket, but we are a Key Player. And let's be honest: No one but no one does staged events & Hollywood-infused propaganda like America. Those efforts officially launched in late 2019/early 2020 were MASTERFUL--as was the social media campaign, complete with dancing nurses, Healthcare Heroes reporting from the Frontlines, & contrived whistleblowers Cruise ship "outbreaks", screening at the airports, putting the first patients in E.T. pods...perfect for that "virus from afar" story. So what was that REALLY all about? In my opinion, there WAS a public health problem. But not the one people have been led to believe in. THAT is a big reason elected/appointed officials, private parties, borderless entities, and the likes of Robert Malone et al can keep telling spectacular noble lies with such aplomb. ###

Saved - November 29, 2023 at 3:38 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Many people are dying, but the connection to the Covid vaccine is being ignored. The lack of discussion raises questions about government, media, and institutions. Is there an infiltration? Something seems amiss.

@bambkb - Kevin - WE THE PEOPLE❤️ - DAD🦁 🐉 🔥

🚨🚨🚨Why are so many people dying and why is no one connecting it to the #Covid #Vaccine? Literally NOTHING has changed, except a mass injection rollout? WHY ARE THEY REFUSING TO TALK ABOUT IT? Have our governments, media and lead institutions been infiltrated that badly? It seems like it to me🤷‍♂️

Saved - December 21, 2023 at 1:59 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Spain experienced a high number of deaths and few cases in the beginning, with peak deaths on April 2, 2020. There is uncertainty about whether the deaths in March and April were caused by SARS-COV2 infection. Influenza had been eradicated from Spain by April 1, 2020.

@I_Am_JohnCullen - John Cullen

Spain sure had a LOT of deaths and very few cases back in the beginning. In fact, peak deaths were April 2, 2020. Are you certain that the people that died in Spain in March and April, 2020 died from SARS-COV2 infection? How are you certain? https://t.co/O01m2Uvjei

@I_Am_JohnCullen - John Cullen

By April 1, 2020 Influenza had been eradicated from Spain, entriely. https://t.co/mQrcG8tU9y

Saved - December 26, 2023 at 2:24 AM

@thevivafrei - Viva Frei

Going down the rabbit-hole of how Covid made the flu “disappear”… https://t.co/df4Tf3hleF

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the disappearance of the flu during the COVID-19 pandemic and questions why it was not as prevalent as usual. They explore various explanations, including the idea that COVID-19 was more contagious and therefore outcompeted the flu. They also mention studies suggesting that social distancing and mask-wearing measures effectively eradicated the flu. The speaker raises concerns about the financial incentives hospitals received for COVID-19 cases and suggests that misdiagnosing flu cases as COVID-19 may have occurred. They conclude that corruption and control may have played a role in the handling of the pandemic. The speaker encourages viewers to join their community for more information and understanding.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Alright, peeps. This is gonna be a little Blair Witch esque vlog. I was having a discussion with a family member, and we started talking about COVID, the pandemic, because what else are you gonna talk about during Christmas? Oh, 3 years into this pandemic, and I dropped a a statistic that I then had to immediately go fact check myself on. I'm talking and I say, do you not find it odd that the flu basically disappeared during COVID? And then I was immediately challenged. That's not true. And I was like, I'm gonna go fact check myself just to make sure. And lo and behold, I went down a rabbit hole. My wife has been saying that I've gotta think about something else. But For those of you who are not afflicted with OCD or ADHD or whatever obsessive compulsive disorder it is, I had gone down a rabbit hole of this piece of information that I knew that I knew that I've never really stopped to think about in thorough detail. For those of you who don't know, The flu which killed, I don't know, close to, I wanna say, 60,000 people in the US in 2017 to 2018 was It was apparently, like, the worst flu season, worldwide. In 2018, the flu season was so bad in Canada that they were canceling elective surgeries at hospitals because hospitals were overwhelmed. But I think it was 2016 to 2017 or 2017 to 2018 that was a wildly, virulent strain of the flu that killed tens of thousands of people, and I think the number is close to 60,000. You then fast forward to 2020 to 2021. The number was not even reported in a statistica, statistics about the flu deaths for that year. Like, it goes oddly enough from 2018 to 2019, 2019 to 2020, then 2021 to 2022. It skips the 2020 to 2021 year. And even more suspicious, in 2021 to 2022, they reported, like, 5,000 flu deaths in America, which is, like, a quarter of what it was during a typical flu season. And you read articles, and they do not hide the Fact that they are trying to convince the general population, the general public, that the flu all but disappeared during COVID. From Scientific American, Flu has disappeared for more than a year. Mask wearing, social distancing, and other steps to stop COVID nineteen have also curtailed influenza. That would seem to suggest that it also curtailed COVID nineteen. Oh, and then by the way, in pure gaslighting fashion, barely 8 months later, the fact checkers say, Fact check. Influenza virus is still active, hasn't, quote, disappeared, end quote. Can you believe the gaslighting? They are trying to make us think that we are going crazy. So I was not misremembering. It was in fact a correct memory, a correct understanding. The flu disappeared during COVID. Then I immediately began thinking, Don't wanna go down the conspiratorial rabbit hole. How could that be? And I began listening to people's explanations. I remember at the time, originally, when I had heard this statistic, the flu disappeared, and I questioned it back in the day. His name is ZDoggMD. He had an explanation that during, you know, a pandemic where you have competing respiratory viruses, obviously, that which is more contagious is gonna be the one that wins out. So, hence, in the battle between COVID and influenza, COVID was more contagious. Therefore, COVID, you know, defeated influenza, eradicating it effectively. Speaker 1: Now let's go back to SARS CoV 2. In this case, SARS completely supplanted influenza and, you know, RSV and these other upper airway, You know, infections that happen the same time a year. So could it be that it's a mix of everything? So We've shut down schools. We we've we've closed air travel. We've social distanced. We've masked. But then we've also got a large percentage of the population that is Infected or has been infected with SARS CoV 2 fired up interferon response and suppressed the rest off the circulating respiratory viruses, preventing this twindemic that we were talking about. Speaker 0: Other people pause it. And I mean, like, other people, experts, studies. I read a a a a summary of a study out of Harvard, which was hypothesizing that the reason influenza didn't spread and why we had virtually none of it, virtually none, since the outbreak of the COVID pandemic was because of social distancing, face masking, hygiene measures that were imposed on society as a whole, It basically eradicated, influenza. That's how effective it was. From a publication in Harvard School of Public Health A sharp drop in flu cases during COVID 19 pandemic. Precautions taken to fight the COVID nineteen pandemic, including wearing masks and distancing, are likely the major reason for a steep decline in flu cases in the US according to experts. Experts. Okay. Then how did it not work on COVID? I mean, the the you have to make that make sense. That's a square peg in a circle hole or whatever the expression is. Okay. The social distancing, hygiene, face masking measures were so effective, it eradicated influenza. And in 1 season, we magically made it drop to virtually 0, and yet it had no impact whatsoever on preventing the spread of COVID, or maybe it did maybe it would have been 10 times worse had we not done this, but it had very little impact seemingly. And according to a New York Times article, the face masks did nothing. Did we learn a lesson? So the measures worked for influenza, but not for COVID. You gotta make that make sense. Some people are saying, well, influenza spreads through bigger droplets, I don't know, closer contact. COVID was a much more contagious virus, and therefore, even these social distancing face masking measures, which worked on influenza, didn't work on COVID. Okay. Then why in the name of God's green earth Would we continue with these measures if, though effective against influenza, interesting enough, not effective against COVID, we continue with these measures? It makes no sense. It cannot make sense. And these are all just perfectly logical questions to be asked in the light of these statistics, which we are being told is the case. I go to the the Harvard study. Their biggest concern was not how to explain away the fact that influenza dropped to basically 0 because of these very effective measures which didn't work on COVID. Their concern was, let's just bypass that altogether. Let's just jump over that and worry about what's coming with future influenza, seasons because people hadn't been exposed to influenza for the last couple of years. Kistler, the Sperd also discussed how lower flu prevalence this year creates uncertainties about how the virus will evolve in the future. Quote, we have no idea how obliterating the flu for an entire year affects its evolution, end quote. He said, quote, we don't know if it's going to be easier to predict next year's flu strain because it hasn't been spreading as much or if it's going to be a lot harder because it's gone through this really tight evolutionary bottleneck, end quote. That's the concern. Not trying to explain away how all of this could possibly make sense. The most logical conclusion, and it's the one that, I think our viva barneslaw.locals.com community, the above average community there, hypothesizes and can offer some good evidence for. My bottom line conclusion is the only one that makes sense, I think, is that, basically, either they weren't testing for the flu during COVID and only testing for COVID And or they were just lumping all flu cases as COVID, lumping all flu infections, hospitalizations, deaths as COVID. Why would they be doing that? Showing the money. Well, there was this, unfortunate reality of financial incentives or at least financial compensation for COVID during a pandemic public health crisis. Hospitals were being compensated bonuses, premiums, amounts for COVID hospitalizations, for putting people on respirators. From an AP fact check, in thinking they were debunking another claim, this is what they actually admit. Hospital COVID payments tied to patient and treatment, not deaths. Oh, please do go on, AP. AP's assessment, false. Hospital industry officials and public health Experts confirm the federal government provides hospitals with enhanced payments for treating COVID 19 patients, but the payments are only currently applicable to those on Medicare. The enhanced payments, which are slated to end in May, also aren't contingent on a patient's death, but on the treatment or services provided to the patients, they said. They were being offered a financial compensation for these COVID infections. Whether or not that would influence people to reflexively or even, dare I say, potentially inaccurately, label a a, influenza hospitalization as a COVID because, look, they're in there for Respiratory. Anyhow, it's sort of a a, you know, a symptom determined, diagnosis. In any event, why not? We're gonna get a little bit of a financial incentive. Well, you read of one fact check-in particular, which is shocked and outraged at the idea that there might have been some indirect subconscious incentivizing to, overstate COVID hospitalizations, COVID deaths because of this financial incentive. They said no no one would ever do that. It it was fact checked false. No hospitals are not lying about COVID infections and COVID deaths for monetary gain. You notice how they impute intention and they impute causality so as to jump over just bypass The observation itself, which was whether or not hospitals were in fact being financially incentivized for COVID diagnosis, COVID deaths, respiratory, treatments, etcetera. From factcheck .org, the most reliable of fact checkers, and, yes, I'm being sarcastic, hospital payments and the COVID nineteen death count posted on April 21, 2020. My, we really didn't have much information at the time now, did we? Or hospitals inflating the number of COVID 19 cases and deaths so they can be paid more. Numerous readers have asked us about such claims, some of which imply that hospitals are making money by simply listing patients as having the disease when in fact the payments referenced are for treating patients. And while some of the posts imply that fraud may be afoot, multiple experts told us that such theories of hospitals deliberately miscoding patients as COVID 19 patients are not supported by the evidence. Quote, there's an implication here that hospitals are over reporting their COVID patients because they have an economic advantage in doing so, which is really an outrageous claim, end quote. Gerald Kaminski, senior fellow at the UCLA Center For Health Policy Research, told us. And he said any suggestion that patients may be put on ventilators of a financial gain, Not medical need, quote, is basically saying physicians are violating their Hippocratic oath. It would be like providing heart surgery on someone who doesn't need it, end quote. One fact check that I read said doctors wouldn't falsely diagnose them with COVID because that would violate their Hippocratic Oath. To which I immediately think, If I can find a doctor who's gonna lop off the healthy breasts of a young girl in the name of gender affirming care, I'll find an unscrupulous doctor that's to misdiagnose someone with COVID if it means that they're gonna get whatever 1,000 of dollars, bonus compensation, because of the health care system and the way it's been When you financially incentivize something, you don't have to coerce. It just becomes part of the system. And just to add something here as I edit while I walk back from the Cornfield, financial motivation is not the only type of relevant motivation. You can have fear as a, very important motivating factor here because I've interviewed people who have confirmed that at the time, what about they were slapping patients on ventilators for whatever extra financial gain they might get? They were doing it even if it wasn't necessarily in the best Medical interest of the patient because they were scared of getting the virus. And they thought by putting them on respirators, it would somehow protect the people, the nurses, the doctors, other patients, because their air will be recirculated into their own body and they wouldn't be spreading their COVID germs around there. Fear is a very, very good motivator, almost as good as financial motivation. Alright. Back to the video. When I had on John Beaudoin senior, just recently who was explaining to me that the spike in renal failure reports of renal failure, in fact, didn't coincide with the authorization to prescribe Remdesivir. It coincided with the financial incentivizing to diagnose with Remdesivir, as a as a treatment. That's when you notice a spike in renal. So the financial aspect of it, it creates the ecosystem. It creates the environment for it. And so this fact check which says Doctors would not be so unscrupulous to misdiagnose, etcetera, etcetera, because that would violate their Hippocratic Oath. Well, things are going fast in the pandemic. Someone comes into the hospital with certain symptoms. It's the logical thing to do, and it certainly explains how influenza diagnoses, infections, deaths Basically went to 0. This is what we call an orgy of evidence. No many orgies I had as a homicide cop or How many? None. This was all arranged. So one heck of a rabbit hole to go down and, at the end of the day, money corrupts everything. And at the end of the day, there are things that cannot and do not make sense, and people are very willing just to forgive and forget and move on. That's behind us. The wholesale corruption of the healthcare system, the health authority system, governments, everything, Wholesale corruption for financial gain, for narrative control, for compliance control. If the masks and the social distancing did not work for COVID, then why continue to implement it? Make sense of that without reflexively thinking control subordination of a population. But try to make sense of any of this. It can't make sense unless you adopt a nefarious financially motivated, modus operandi. That was my rabbit hole thought process of this very question. It's weird and can be very difficult to make sense of without Going into dark places. Alright. Well, this is a beautiful, it's a beautiful forest. I mean, this is beautiful weather. You know what to do if you like this stuff. Like, share, subscribe, hit the notification Join our viva barneslaw.locals.comcommunity, where you can partake in this aggregate wealth of knowledge, a community that knows its stuff that keeps others in check, that share knowledge and information with other members of the community so that we can all, as a whole, get much smarter, understand what's going on, and react better to the world around Go. Merry Christmas, and I'll see you before New Year's, but happy New Year's. The first sign of corruption in a society that is still alive is that the end justifies the means. George Bernanos. I can't say I understand this, but it sounds deep.
Saved - December 26, 2023 at 11:45 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Post 1: The author thanks David Freiheit for mentioning their video and announces the preorder availability of their book. Post 2: The author presents graphs showing a decrease in respiratory and pneumonia cases, as well as the disappearance of the flu in 2021. They suggest that flu cases were misreported as COVID-19 deaths for financial gain. Post 3: The author shares graphs indicating higher death rates among younger individuals in the third wave of COVID-19, questioning the efficacy of vaccines. Post 4: The author discusses the increase in deaths due to acute respiratory failure (ARF) in 2021 and 2022, suggesting a correlation with the Nov 2 CMS payment. Post 5: The author highlights a specific point on a graph related to the timing of financial incentives. Post 6: The author provides a clearer view of the correlation between the start of financial incentives and ARF excess deaths. Post 7: The author presents data from Minnesota, showing a divergence in 2020 after the introduction of financial incentives. Post 8: The author emphasizes the irrefutability of the visualized data, indicating a rise in deaths after the start of financial incentives. Post 9: The author expresses fatigue and shares a teaser about the CDC Memorandum, emphasizing that each number represents a person who died. Post 10: The author presents another page from the CDC Memorandum, highlighting excess deaths associated with cardiac issues and the COVID-19 vaccine. Post 11: The author shares a page from the CDC Memorandum discussing the potential risk of cancer associated with the COVID-19 vaccine and calls for action against those responsible.

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

1/ Thanks much David Freiheit, THE VIVA FREI, for the callout in this video. I will add a few graphs from my book and memorandum, which are on preorder at the site listed on my profile and will ship in 2 weeks or so.

@thevivafrei - Viva Frei

Going down the rabbit-hole of how Covid made the flu “disappear”… https://t.co/df4Tf3hleF

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the disappearance of the flu during the COVID-19 pandemic and questions why it was not reported in statistics. They explore various explanations, including the idea that COVID-19 was more contagious and therefore outcompeted the flu. They also mention a study from Harvard suggesting that social distancing and mask-wearing measures effectively eradicated the flu. The speaker raises concerns about the inconsistency in the effectiveness of these measures against COVID-19. They also mention financial incentives for hospitals to diagnose COVID-19 cases, which may have led to misdiagnosis or overreporting. The speaker concludes that corruption and control may be behind these inconsistencies.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Alright, peeps. This is gonna be a little Blair Witch esque vlog. I was having a discussion with a family member, and we started talking about COVID, the pandemic, because what else are you gonna talk about during Christmas? Oh, 3 years into this pandemic, and I dropped a a statistic that I then had to immediately go fact check myself on. I'm talking and I say, do you not find it odd that the flu basically disappeared during COVID? And then I was immediately challenged. That's not true. And I was like, I'm gonna go fact check myself just to make sure. And lo and behold, I went down a rabbit hole. My wife has been saying that I've gotta think about something else. But For those of you who are not afflicted with OCD or ADHD or whatever obsessive compulsive disorder it is, I had gone down a rabbit hole of this piece of information that I knew that I knew that I've never really stopped to think about in thorough detail. For those of you who don't know, The flu which killed, I don't know, close to, I wanna say, 60,000 people in the US in 2017 to 2018 was It was apparently, like, the worst flu season, worldwide. In 2018, the flu season was so bad in Canada that they were canceling elective surgeries at hospitals because hospitals were overwhelmed. But I think it was 2016 to 2017 or 2017 to 2018 that was a wildly, virulent strain of the flu that killed tens of thousands of people, and I think the number is close to 60,000. You then fast forward to 2020 to 2021. The number was not even reported in a statistica, statistics about the flu deaths for that year. Like, it goes oddly enough from 2018 to 2019, 2019 to 2020, then 2021 to 2022. It skips the 2020 to 2021 year. And even more suspicious, in 2021 to 2022, they reported, like, 5,000 flu deaths in America, which is, like, a quarter of what it was during a typical flu season. And you read articles, and they do not hide the Fact that they are trying to convince the general population, the general public, that the flu all but disappeared during COVID. From Scientific American, Flu has disappeared for more than a year. Mask wearing, social distancing, and other steps to stop COVID nineteen have also curtailed influenza. That would seem to suggest that it also curtailed COVID nineteen. Oh, and then by the way, in pure gaslighting fashion, barely 8 months later, the fact checkers say, Fact check. Influenza virus is still active, hasn't, quote, disappeared, end quote. Can you believe the gaslighting? They are trying to make us think that we are going crazy. So I was not misremembering. It was in fact a correct memory, a correct understanding. The flu disappeared during COVID. Then I immediately began thinking, Don't wanna go down the conspiratorial rabbit hole. How could that be? And I began listening to people's explanations. I remember at the time, originally, when I had heard this statistic, the flu disappeared, and I questioned it back in the day. His name is ZDoggMD. He had an explanation that during, you know, a pandemic where you have competing respiratory viruses, obviously, that which is more contagious is gonna be the one that wins out. So, hence, in the battle between COVID and influenza, COVID was more contagious. Therefore, COVID, you know, defeated influenza, eradicating it effectively. Speaker 1: Now let's go back to SARS CoV 2. In this case, SARS completely supplanted influenza and, you know, RSV and these other upper airway, You know, infections that happen the same time a year. So could it be that it's a mix of everything? So We've shut down schools. We we've we've closed air travel. We've social distanced. We've masked. But then we've also got a large percentage of the population that is Infected or has been infected with SARS CoV 2 fired up interferon response and suppressed the rest off the circulating respiratory viruses, preventing this twindemic that we were talking about. Speaker 0: Other people pause it. And I mean, like, other people, experts, studies. I read a a a a summary of a study out of Harvard, which was hypothesizing that the reason influenza didn't spread and why we had virtually none of it, virtually none, since the outbreak of the COVID pandemic was because of social distancing, face masking, hygiene measures that were imposed on society as a whole, It basically eradicated, influenza. That's how effective it was. From a publication in Harvard School of Public Health A sharp drop in flu cases during COVID 19 pandemic. Precautions taken to fight the COVID nineteen pandemic, including wearing masks and distancing, are likely the major reason for a steep decline in flu cases in the US according to experts. Experts. Okay. Then how did it not work on COVID? I mean, the the you have to make that make sense. That's a square peg in a circle hole or whatever the expression is. Okay. The social distancing, hygiene, face masking measures were so effective, it eradicated influenza. And in 1 season, we magically made it drop to virtually 0, and yet it had no impact whatsoever on preventing the spread of COVID, or maybe it did maybe it would have been 10 times worse had we not done this, but it had very little impact seemingly. And according to a New York Times article, the face masks did nothing. Did we learn a lesson? So the measures worked for influenza, but not for COVID. You gotta make that make sense. Some people are saying, well, influenza spreads through bigger droplets, I don't know, closer contact. COVID was a much more contagious virus, and therefore, even these social distancing face masking measures, which worked on influenza, didn't work on COVID. Okay. Then why in the name of God's green earth Would we continue with these measures if, though effective against influenza, interesting enough, not effective against COVID, we continue with these measures? It makes no sense. It cannot make sense. And these are all just perfectly logical questions to be asked in the light of these statistics, which we are being told is the case. I go to the the Harvard study. Their biggest concern was not how to explain away the fact that influenza dropped to basically 0 because of these very effective measures which didn't work on COVID. Their concern was, let's just bypass that altogether. Let's just jump over that and worry about what's coming with future influenza, seasons because people hadn't been exposed to influenza for the last couple of years. Kistler, the Sperd also discussed how lower flu prevalence this year creates uncertainties about how the virus will evolve in the future. Quote, we have no idea how obliterating the flu for an entire year affects its evolution, end quote. He said, quote, we don't know if it's going to be easier to predict next year's flu strain because it hasn't been spreading as much or if it's going to be a lot harder because it's gone through this really tight evolutionary bottleneck, end quote. That's the concern. Not trying to explain away how all of this could possibly make sense. The most logical conclusion, and it's the one that, I think our viva barneslaw.locals.com community, the above average community there, hypothesizes and can offer some good evidence for. My bottom line conclusion is the only one that makes sense, I think, is that, basically, either they weren't testing for the flu during COVID and only testing for COVID And or they were just lumping all flu cases as COVID, lumping all flu infections, hospitalizations, deaths as COVID. Why would they be doing that? Showing the money. Well, there was this, unfortunate reality of financial incentives or at least financial compensation for COVID during a pandemic public health crisis. Hospitals were being compensated bonuses, premiums, amounts for COVID hospitalizations, for putting people on respirators. From an AP fact check, in thinking they were debunking another claim, this is what they actually admit. Hospital COVID payments tied to patient and treatment, not deaths. Oh, please do go on, AP. AP's assessment, false. Hospital industry officials and public health Experts confirm the federal government provides hospitals with enhanced payments for treating COVID 19 patients, but the payments are only currently applicable to those on Medicare. The enhanced payments, which are slated to end in May, also aren't contingent on a patient's death, but on the treatment or services provided to the patients, they said. They were being offered a financial compensation for these COVID infections. Whether or not that would influence people to reflexively or even, dare I say, potentially inaccurately, label a a, influenza hospitalization as a COVID because, look, they're in there for Respiratory. Anyhow, it's sort of a a, you know, a symptom determined, diagnosis. In any event, why not? We're gonna get a little bit of a financial incentive. Well, you read of one fact check-in particular, which is shocked and outraged at the idea that there might have been some indirect subconscious incentivizing to, overstate COVID hospitalizations, COVID deaths because of this financial incentive. They said no no one would ever do that. It it was fact checked false. No hospitals are not lying about COVID infections and COVID deaths for monetary gain. You notice how they impute intention and they impute causality so as to jump over just bypass The observation itself, which was whether or not hospitals were in fact being financially incentivized for COVID diagnosis, COVID deaths, respiratory, treatments, etcetera. From factcheck .org, the most reliable of fact checkers, and, yes, I'm being sarcastic, hospital payments and the COVID nineteen death count posted on April 21, 2020. My, we really didn't have much information at the time now, did we? Or hospitals inflating the number of COVID 19 cases and deaths so they can be paid more. Numerous readers have asked us about such claims, some of which imply that hospitals are making money by simply listing patients as having the disease when in fact the payments referenced are for treating patients. And while some of the posts imply that fraud may be afoot, multiple experts told us that such theories of hospitals deliberately miscoding patients as COVID 19 patients are not supported by the evidence. Quote, there's an implication here that hospitals are over reporting their COVID patients because they have an economic advantage in doing so, which is really an outrageous claim, end quote. Gerald Kaminski, senior fellow at the UCLA Center For Health Policy Research, told us. And he said any suggestion that patients may be put on ventilators of a financial gain, Not medical need, quote, is basically saying physicians are violating their Hippocratic oath. It would be like providing heart surgery on someone who doesn't need it, end quote. One fact check that I read said doctors wouldn't falsely diagnose them with COVID because that would violate their Hippocratic Oath. To which I immediately think, If I can find a doctor who's gonna lop off the healthy breasts of a young girl in the name of gender affirming care, I'll find an unscrupulous doctor that's to misdiagnose someone with COVID if it means that they're gonna get whatever 1,000 of dollars, bonus compensation, because of the health care system and the way it's been When you financially incentivize something, you don't have to coerce. It just becomes part of the system. And just to add something here as I edit while I walk back from the Cornfield, financial motivation is not the only type of relevant motivation. You can have fear as a, very important motivating factor here because I've interviewed people who have confirmed that at the time, what about they were slapping patients on ventilators for whatever extra financial gain they might get? They were doing it even if it wasn't necessarily in the best Medical interest of the patient because they were scared of getting the virus. And they thought by putting them on respirators, it would somehow protect the people, the nurses, the doctors, other patients, because their air will be recirculated into their own body and they wouldn't be spreading their COVID germs around there. Fear is a very, very good motivator, almost as good as financial motivation. Alright. Back to the video. When I had on John Beaudoin senior, just recently who was explaining to me that the spike in renal failure reports of renal failure, in fact, didn't coincide with the authorization to prescribe Remdesivir. It coincided with the financial incentivizing to diagnose with Remdesivir, as a as a treatment. That's when you notice a spike in renal. So the financial aspect of it, it creates the ecosystem. It creates the environment for it. And so this fact check which says Doctors would not be so unscrupulous to misdiagnose, etcetera, etcetera, because that would violate their Hippocratic Oath. Well, things are going fast in the pandemic. Someone comes into the hospital with certain symptoms. It's the logical thing to do, and it certainly explains how influenza diagnoses, infections, deaths Basically went to 0. This is what we call an orgy of evidence. No many orgies I had as a homicide cop or How many? None. This was all arranged. So one heck of a rabbit hole to go down and, at the end of the day, money corrupts everything. And at the end of the day, there are things that cannot and do not make sense, and people are very willing just to forgive and forget and move on. That's behind us. The wholesale corruption of the healthcare system, the health authority system, governments, everything, Wholesale corruption for financial gain, for narrative control, for compliance control. If the masks and the social distancing did not work for COVID, then why continue to implement it? Make sense of that without reflexively thinking control subordination of a population. But try to make sense of any of this. It can't make sense unless you adopt a nefarious financially motivated, modus operandi. That was my rabbit hole thought process of this very question. It's weird and can be very difficult to make sense of without Going into dark places. Alright. Well, this is a beautiful, it's a beautiful forest. I mean, this is beautiful weather. You know what to do if you like this stuff. Like, share, subscribe, hit the notification Join our viva barneslaw.locals.comcommunity, where you can partake in this aggregate wealth of knowledge, a community that knows its stuff that keeps others in check, that share knowledge and information with other members of the community so that we can all, as a whole, get much smarter, understand what's going on, and react better to the world around Go. Merry Christmas, and I'll see you before New Year's, but happy New Year's. The first sign of corruption in a society that is still alive is that the end justifies the means. George Bernanos. I can't say I understand this, but it sounds deep.

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

2/ As for the flu conversation, here is Figure 19.12 from page 254 of "THE REAL CdC - PUBLIC HEALTH CRIMES 2020-2022" Respiratory "J" codes went down 2020 to 2021 and 2022. So did Pneumonia unspecified (notice the numbers) So did Viral pneumonia. So did covid Bacterial pneumonia went UP (or you can say it was flat) WHY? Why did MORE people die as a percentage of overall deaths and more in total number die from bacterial pneumonia in the years of the vx??? Now for flu. The numbers in 2020 occurred mostly BEFORE covid hit in March. That is, Jan, Feb comprise most of the 2020 flu numbers. But look at 2021. POOF - GONE. Where'd flu go. That "Long Live Freedom" guy was absolutely right. Do NOT stop investigating at flu though. Massachusetts purported 5,579 covid deaths in 2021. Look at 2021 for flu codes. Combine the two codes. It's 421. So ... yeah ... they stole flu to make up covid deaths to get money. But that's 421 is LESS THAN TEN PERCENT of 5,579.

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

3/ Before moving on to renal failure timing, here's Figure 19.8 from my book. The 85+ age group is what a disease should look like. It's a damped harmonic style where the amplitude of each wave is diminishing until gone. But look at all the ages younger than 55. After being vx'd, people under 55 died MORE in the third wave of cvid than the first or second waves of cvid. That seems to me to be negative efficacy. No matter what it is, you cannot explain it. Those young people were exposed to covid in TWO FULL SEASONS before succumbing in the THIRD WAVE. WHY?????

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

4/ I don't know if I'm supposed to do this, but this is an actual page out of my book. See the ARF deaths and how they grow over time. I earlier explain the differences among seasonal externalities, linearly increasing externalities, and steady-state externalities. Now look at the utter MASSIVE numbers of deaths. Some were greater in 2020 BEFORE remdesivir. People who died in excess had some ARF issues as well. BUT, those were culled and not available to die in 2021 and 2022. But MORE ... MANY MORE died in 2021 and 2022 after the Nov 2 CMS dot gov payment NCTAP kicked in. And as the waveform shows, the system is a combination of seasonal externality and linearly increasing externality. There are TWO externalities derived from the graphs. I know it's confusing without the context of several pages of explanation. And the book is more about people than graphs. This is only one page.

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

5/ This is not from my book. This is from page F-2 of EXHIBIT F from "The CDC Memorandum" that will ship in a few weeks. Also on preorder at TheRealCdC dot com Notice the dashed line in the really lower right corner of the graph. There is an arrow pointing at it. That's when the money kicked in.

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

6/ Here's a better view. Begin money = begin ARF excess deaths https://t.co/PtoPJ6qSvL

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

7/ If you think it's only MA, guess again. This is in all states. But I only have record-level source data from MA and MN. Sooooo .... here's Minnesota. Notice the lower LEFT graph. See the arrow. Notice that dashed line 2020 pulls away from the gray plots 2015-2019 a couple weeks after the money kicks in from CMS dot gov Page F-7 from EXHIBIT F of "The CDC Memorandum"

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

8/ Here's a better view. For all the trolls, this is just data visualized for regular people to see and understand. This is irrefutable. Trolls have no where to go with this stuff. They're boxed in. It's just true official state data visualized. Notice the arrow. Notice the rise AFTER the money kicked in.

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

9/ I'm tired and it's 2:32 AM. So here's one more teaser unrelated to Viva's video, but it's very telling. The CDC Memorandum has about 400 graphs of all types of data up through the first half of 2023. This NOT JUST DATA. Every number you see is a PERSON who DIED and had a family and friends. See the FOUR 25-44 aged people in 2022. They had kids and were kids. They're gone. It stared in 2021 and did NOT show excess in 2020, the year of massive numbers of covid deaths in Massachusetts. Look through the age groups. Look at the fiscal year bar graph at the bottom. How many got killed by the jabs. We KNOW sudden blood loss anemia NON-TRAUMATIC is associated with the jabs. The thrombocytopenia graphs show the same thing. Oh heck I'll just post another page after this one and then I'll go to bed.

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

10/ Page B-7 of The CDC Memorandum See, no excess in 2020 despite HUGE covid deaths numbers. Oh, but it's only 66 excess people in 2021 and 2022 combined. Yes, but this is ONE ICD-10 code. There are 3,000 excess cardiac arrest deaths, 500 excess PE deaths, 400 cardiac arrhythmia deaths, and many others. Easily 4,500 excess deaths in MA alone from causes associated with the jab and timed to the jab. People gotta wake up and ensure this never happens again. NO MRNA JABS EVER. They cannot correct them. And other jabs are bad, too. They all SUK.

@JohnBeaudoinSr - John Beaudoin, Sr. aka, Coquin de Chien

11/ Page E-5 from The CDC Memorandum If they didn't get you with the acute issues of clotting and bleeding, then there's still a chance you'll end up with cancer. So sorry to write it like that. People gotta get angry. Raise hell. Throw all the murderers out and then prosecute them. You can read this for yourself. Both calendar year and fiscal year graphs here to show 2023 increasing still. END of THREAD - gnite

Saved - December 28, 2023 at 3:26 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The flu shots' true dangers are being concealed by the CDC, who refuse to show the Medicare data post-shot. The credibility of the flu vaccine would be destroyed if they did. Check out the chart they're hiding. Many people I know have been injured by flu shots and refuse to get them or COVID boosters. The Medicare data for flu shots in 2021 reveals concerning death rates. The PNEU shot, on the other hand, appears safer, except for the day 0 deaths.

@stkirsch - Steve Kirsch

The flu shots are far more deadly than the CDC will ever admit. This is why they NEVER show the Medicare data post shot. NEVER! If they did, it would be game over for the flu vax and their credibility. Do you want to see the chart they won't show you?

@KatieGr37959419 - Katy

@stkirsch All of my excoworkers won't even get a flu shot let alone a covid booster. They are literally all injured or know someone that is. Missoula, MT. They thought I was crazy in 21 for leavening a 23 year career after 6 months of discrimination and asking about the kill protocols

@stkirsch - Steve Kirsch

Here is the Medicare data for the flu shot in 2021. This is deaths per day since the shot was given for everyone who got the shot in 2021. The "hump" shouldn't be there. Neither should the Day 0 deaths. https://t.co/FHecjoHS1Q

@stkirsch - Steve Kirsch

For comparison, here's a safer vaccine the PNEU shot given in the same year. Would be a safe vax except for the day 0 deaths (the dot at 900): https://t.co/9LmTHe16nO

Saved - December 28, 2023 at 1:36 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Post 1: The author questions why @TheVivaFrei ignores their work and speculates if it's due to arrogance or something more. They also suggest that @TheVivaFrei might be affiliated with Canadian intelligence or working with the CIA. They mention explaining it to Dr. Dave Collum, a professor at Cornell University, and express a desire to explain it to Viva. Post Referenced by Post 1: @ZDoggMD is cited by @thevivafrei discussing viral interference. The author questions if viral interference occurred in all 107 countries simultaneously and if it "pushed out" influenza. They also point out that influenza is the top comorbidity of COVID in the USA, raising the question of how both can be true. Post 2: The author wonders if @TheVivaFrei is intentionally avoiding them and leaves it up to the readers to decide.

@I_Am_JohnCullen - John Cullen

Why does @TheVivaFrei ignore my work? Is he arrogant, or is it something worse than that? Is he Canadian intelligence? Is he working with the CIA? Here, I explain it to Dr Dave Collum, Professor of Organic Chemistry at Cornell University. I'd love to explain it Viva https://t.co/AKiQh5fXFi

Video Transcript AI Summary
There were two pandemics happening simultaneously: the blue pandemic and the green pandemic. The green pandemic refers to COVID-19, while the blue pandemic is less visible due to the dominance of COVID-19. The speaker wants to understand why there were two pandemics and why only one was widely discussed. They mention that the two pandemics correlate strongly and suggest exploring other phenomena that occurred during this time.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm gonna give you the bottom line upfront so that I'm not teasing you for, you know, the next hour of the conversations to what the hell happened here. Speaker 1: So Thank you. Speaker 0: Alright. So it's it's sort of one of the things that they do, I think, at West Point is bottom line upfront and then show us how how did you bake the cake, how did you do this, how did you get here. The net of it is that there were 2 pandemics. What one of them, one of the pandemics was what I call the blue pandemic and the other was the green pandemic. What you're seeing here is the 2 pandemics overlaid. The green one is COVID. The blue one is rather difficult to see because of COVID. Mhmm. And what we're gonna do is take a look and understand, wait a minute, how were there 2 pandemics? Why would there be 2 pandemics? Why would they only tell us about 1? Speaker 1: And they correlate pretty rigorously. Speaker 0: Yes, they do, don't they? Now and we're gonna look at, well, how do they correlate so rigorously and what other phenomenon were taking place at the same time Speaker 1: what

@I_Am_JohnCullen - John Cullen

Hey @ZDoggMD @thevivafrei is citing you here talking about viral interference. Is that what happened in all 107 countries? At the same time? So viral interference "pushed out" influenza? But it's the #1 comorbidity of COVID in the USA. So, how can both be true?

@I_Am_JohnCullen - John Cullen

Is he avoiding me? You be the judge: https://t.co/5s93coa2Ff

Saved - January 5, 2024 at 8:14 AM

@NickHudsonCT - Nick Hudson

One of the best calls in Covid Twitter history. Look at the date!

@Thomas_Binder - Dr. Thomas Binder, MD

The excess mortality in Europe (link) is currently lower than during the last 'influenza season'. Are we sure that actually #SARSCoV2 is spreading extremely fast, not rather the number of people who are tested? #SARSCoV2 #COVID19 https://euromomo.eu

EUROMOMO EuroMOMO Bulletin, Week 52, 2023 EuroMOMO pooled estimates show an elevated level of mortality, mainly in those ≥ 65 years old This week’s pooled EuroMOMO estimates of all… euromomo.eu
Saved - January 22, 2024 at 1:05 PM

@amuse - @amuse

There is no proof that the experimental mRNA vaccines people were forced to take are responsible for excess deaths. Until there is proof we shouldn’t waste our time investigating the vaccines. h/t @ben_kew https://t.co/EknaGOGNZv

Saved - February 23, 2024 at 7:30 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Northern Ireland Statistics & Research Agency (NISRA) has adjusted their records, removing 2,000 excess deaths. The new baseline shows a negative excess of -286 deaths. NISRA added 1,000 deaths to the baseline based on new guidance, eliminating the previously reported excess deaths. The methodology used by NISRA and the Office for National Statistics (ONS) is being criticized for attributing the increase in death rates to changes in population rather than acknowledging excess deaths. Similar adjustments have been made in Scotland and England & Wales, raising questions about what is being hidden and the impact of lockdowns and vaccines.

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

Northern Ireland Statistics & Research Agency #NISRA have just deleted 2,000 #ExcessDeaths from their records In 2023, NI suffered 17,254 deaths 768 more than the 5YA +4.7% above average After raising the new baseline to 17,540, a negative excess of -286 is now reported 1/

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

For 2023, NISRA have now added an extra 1,000 deaths to the baseline, following the new ONS guidance This eliminates the 768 #ExcessDeaths for the year - diluting the high mortality levels still being experienced after the pandemic 2/ https://www.nisra.gov.uk/statistics/deaths/death-statistics

Death Statistics NISRA provisional death statistics are based on death registration information collected by the General Register Office. Information on the quality nisra.gov.uk

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

The new ONS/NISRA methodology claims the increase in death rates is due to changes in population From 2020 to 2023 the NI population has increased by just 0.8% The NEW baseline mortality rate has increased by 9% in the same period This model is FLAWED to hide excess deaths 3/

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

Same truck being played in Scotland🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿⬇️

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

🚨🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿National Records of Scotland have today removed all of the #ExcessDeaths from 2023 Removing 5,000 excess deaths since the roll-out of the COVID-vaccine .. Why? What are they hiding? What caused the excess? Was it the vaccines? 1 of 2

Video Transcript AI Summary
The National Records of Scotland revised excess deaths for 2023, reducing them from 3,329 to 360. They've removed 5,142 excess deaths since the pandemic began, lowering the total from 19,500 to 14,400. The new methodology uses a statistical model instead of a 5-year average, potentially hiding post-vaccine rollout excess deaths. The new method shows abnormal spikes in deaths in 2019 and after the pandemic. This raises questions about the cause of these extra deaths, with some speculating about the vaccine's role. Translation: The National Records of Scotland revised excess deaths for 2023, reducing them significantly. They've removed over 5,000 excess deaths since the pandemic began. The new method raises questions about the cause of these extra deaths, with some speculating about the vaccine's role.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Alright, guys. The National Records of Scotland have today deleted all the excess deaths for 2023. This is in line with the new methodology set out this week by the ONS for calculating excess deaths. So for 2023, using the old method, we had 3,329 deaths excess deaths in Scotland last year. Using the new methodology, they've now reduced that to just 360 excess deaths, removing almost 3,000 excess deaths from the death count. Over the course of the pandemic, they've removed a total of 5,142 excess deaths, reducing the total excess from 19,500 down to 14,400. What they are doing now, guys, is they are hiding the excess deaths that have occurred after the vaccine rollout. So how have they done this? Well, traditionally, NRS and ONS used a 5 year rolling average for calculating their baselines. Now that wasn't without its flaws, but it's a standard process used all over the world. But what I've done now is they've banned the 5 year average and have replaced that with a statistical model, which brings in all kinds of variables that could be manipulated to increase the level of the baseline and in doing so, reduce the level of the excess. Now if you look at the the black dash line here as the old traditional 5 year average method. Now you can see it's rising steady as the death columns in blue here rise and fall. So it's tracking what was going on. But the new method is red line. You can see that it's abnormally high for some reason in 2019 before the pandemic and also spikes from 2022 to 2023 for no apparent reason. This is after the pandemic. Now remember, the World Health Organization declared the pandemic over in May 2023. So why in Scotland are deaths continuing to be high? Higher than pre pandemic levels by around 5000 to 6000 a year. What's causing these extra deaths? Is it the vaccine?

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

England & Wales 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿🚛⬇️

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

🚨The ONS announced they are changing the way #ExcessDeaths are calculated The new ‘Statistical Model’ method has removed 27,000 excess deaths in🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿&🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿since 2020 7,000 from 2020 20,000 from 2021-2023 Are they hiding the harms of lockdown & the vaccine? 1/https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/healthandsocialcare/causesofdeath/articles/estimatingexcessdeathsintheukmethodologychanges/february2024

Estimating excess deaths in the UK, methodology changes - Office for National Statistics Overview of a new method for estimating excess deaths across UK countries, and a comparison of estimates from the new and current methods. ons.gov.uk
Saved - September 1, 2024 at 11:12 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The CDC has confirmed that there is no isolated proof of the Covid virus, as highlighted in a recent FOIA response. This raises questions about whether what people experienced since 2000 was actually the common flu, which notably disappeared in 2020. A lab team tested 1,500 samples in 2020 and found only influenza A and B, concluding that Covid-19 may have been misidentified. They assert that many deaths attributed to Covid were due to co-morbidities exacerbated by the flu. This ongoing lack of isolation remains a critical issue in understanding the virus.

@sophiadahl1 - Sophia Dahl

The CDC Confirmed that Covid Virus Has Never Been Isolated‼️ The CDC officially proved there Is no proof of Covid's existence in response to an FOIA request. What was experienced by people starting in 2000 could very well have been the common flu which interestingly disappeared in 2020. Without isolating the virus and then comparing it to what is in diseased tissue and non diseased tissue, we cannot prove that a certain microbe caused a certain disease‼️ On June 7, 2021, the CDC had stated then also that their searches could not find any evidence that Covid-19 had been isolated. Now we know that in August of 2024, that we still have the issue of it not being isolated. This was the key issue with why the data about the Covid-19 coronavirus had not been shared according to Wu Zunyou, the chief epidemiologist at the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention‼️ 🔗👇 https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_Center_for_Disease_Control_and_Prevention "No, they didn't isolate the virus. That's the issue."‼️ A member of a lab team with a Phd in virology and immunology, together with her lab team, tested 1500 supposed samples of Covid-19 through Koch's postulates and an SEM microscope in southern california in 2020 and they did not find any covid‼️ @PeacfulGenocide 🔗👇 What they found was influenza A and some were influenza B. The researcher concluded after not finding any evidence of Covid being isolated that, "We have now come to the firm conclusion through all our research and lab work, that the COVID 19 was imaginary and fictitious. The flu was called Covid and most of the 225,000 dead were dead through co-morbidities such as heart disease, cancer, diabetes, emphysema etc. and they then got the flu which further weakened their immune system and they died."‼️🙏👇 Ben @USMortality 🔗👇 John Carleton🔗👇 https://www.johnccarleton.org/BLOGGER/2021/08/07/written-proof-cdc-has-no-isolated-purified-sample-of-sars-cov-2-virus-that-causes-covid-19/ Journal of Medical Virology🔗👇 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7166628/ Credit 💫 CovidVaccineAdverseReactions💥

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker states the virus was not isolated. Live animal samples are irrelevant. The speaker suspects the origin is different than originally thought. China's government is presenting the city where the virus emerged as the city that defeated it in a new patriotic film.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Why has the data not been shared? Speaker 1: No. They didn't isolate the virus. That's the issue. Speaker 0: What about live animal samples? Speaker 1: It doesn't tell you anything. I do not suspect it's coming from what we originally thought. Speaker 0: China's government is crafting its own narrative. A patriotic film premiering today that presents the city where the virus first emerged as the one that survived to defeat it.
Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention - Wikipedia en.m.wikipedia.org
Outbreak of pneumonia of unknown etiology in Wuhan, China: The mystery and the miracle ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

@PeacfulGenocide - Enjoying the Peaceful Genocide?

@USMortality This was from 2020:

@USMortality - Ben

Officially confirmed by CDC FOIA: The SARS-CoV-2 virus has not been isolated in a purified sample!

Saved - October 17, 2024 at 12:03 PM

@ABridgen - Andrew Bridgen

Amazing that for the first time in recorded history flu cases almost disappeared during the ‘Covid 19 pandemic.’ Of course they did. https://t.co/KKPXrefPOA

Saved - October 25, 2024 at 3:54 AM

@stkirsch - Steve Kirsch

Want to know how they hid all the vaccine deaths? They simply mislabeled them as COVID deaths. Here's the proof in 30 seconds:

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker wants the subjects to admit and stop committing fraud, and to correct old records. The speaker claims to have found over 100 accidental deaths, including blunt force trauma and acute fentanyl overdoses, that were falsely classified as COVID deaths after the bodies were tested for COVID. The speaker alleges that COVID death numbers were inflated to instill fear.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, it the adjunctive relief I want I'm asking the, I'm asking them to admit the fraud, stop committing fraud, and correct the old records. And when I say fraud, I mean, I found it over a 100 well over a 100, accidental deaths such as, blunt force trauma to the head and torso, acute fentanyl overdoses. They tested dead bodies for COVID, and they called them COVID deaths. And they ran up the numbers for COVID death to make everybody afraid of COVID, and I caught them.
Saved - February 13, 2025 at 1:02 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe the recent CDC data reveals that COVID-19 is now less deadly than the flu, contradicting the narrative that justified lockdowns and vaccine mandates. It raises serious questions about the motives behind these actions—was it truly about public health or control? I wonder why governments and Big Pharma manipulated data and silenced dissent. Many lives were affected by these decisions, and if COVID wasn't the catastrophe they claimed, what was the real reason for the push to vaccinate? The truth is emerging, but will there be accountability for those responsible?

@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson

🚨 THEY LIED: COVID NOW OFFICIALLY LESS DEADLY THAN THE FLU—JUST LIKE "CONSPIRACY THEORISTS" SAID ALL ALONG! 🚨 🔴 It was never about public health—it was about control. 🔴 The CDC’s latest data confirms it: COVID-19 now has a LOWER mortality rate than seasonal flu. Yet, for years, governments locked us down, destroyed businesses, and forced experimental vaccines on millions. 🔴 Why? To panic the population. To push an agenda. To coerce as many people as possible into taking their shots. 🔥 WAS IT JUST ABOUT MONEY? OR WAS IT SOMETHING MUCH DARKER? 🔥 📢 QUESTIONS THAT MUST BE ANSWERED: ⚠️ Why did governments and Big Pharma manipulate the data and silence anyone who questioned the narrative? ⚠️ How many lives were destroyed because of their lies? ⚠️ If COVID was never the apocalypse they claimed, then what was the REAL reason they needed you vaccinated? 🚨 The truth is finally coming out. The conspiracy theorists were RIGHT. The question is: Will the people who pushed this global hysteria ever be held accountable? 🚨

Saved - February 14, 2025 at 12:56 AM

@TheChiefNerd - Chief Nerd

Well that’s not good👇

@SharylAttkisson - Sharyl Attkisson 🕵️‍♂️💼🥋

Why don't you know about this? That time a definitive govt. study concluded flu shots don't work in the elderly-- and didn't make a difference with mortality in any age group. The more of the elderly population that got flu shots, the more the death rate increased." NIH wouldn't give permission to any of the study authors to do an interview with me. Why? Step #2 of sending me down the rabbit hole on vaccines and govt. coverups. @RepThomasMassie Much more in my bestseller: Follow the $cience https://www.amazon.com/Follow-Science-Sharyl-Attkisson/dp/0063314916/ref=sr_1_1

Video Transcript AI Summary
We're taking a closer look at protecting seniors from the flu, following studies questioning the effectiveness of flu shots for older people. While most flu deaths occur in those 65 and older, mass vaccinations haven't done the job. Despite a sharp increase in seniors getting vaccinated over twenty years, flu deaths among the elderly continue to climb. Studies adjusting for various factors still show that flu shots haven't reduced deaths in this group. This same conclusion has been observed in other countries, including Australia, France, Canada, and The UK. The CDC is exploring new strategies, but still advises seniors to get flu shots, as they might lessen flu severity or prevent other complications. The focus may shift towards vaccinating children and others who could transmit the flu to the elderly.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The CDC is taking a closer look at how best to protect seniors from the flu. The agency is holding a symposium about that and other issues this week. It all follows a series of studies that question the effectiveness of flu shots given to older people. Here's Cheryl Atkinson with our report. Speaker 1: Millions of seniors swear by their annual flu shots. After all, ninety percent of people killed by the flu are 65 or older. That's perfect. But CBS News has learned that behind the scenes, public health officials have come to a new and disturbing conclusion. Mass vaccinations of the elderly haven't done the job. Doctor Walter Orenstein was among the first to notice the problem when he headed up the Centers for Disease Control's National Immunization Program. He says it's now become a consensus among public health experts. Speaker 2: What is absolutely clear is that there is still a substantial burden of deaths and hospitalizations out there that has not been prevented through the present strategy. Speaker 1: Here's what scientists have found. Over twenty years, the percentage of seniors getting flu shots increased sharply from fifteen percent to sixty five percent. It stands to reason that flu deaths among the elderly should have taken a dramatic dip, making an X graph like this. Instead, flu deaths among the elderly continue to climb. It was hard to believe, so researchers at the National Institutes of Health set out to do a study adjusting for all kinds of factors that could be masking the true benefits of the shots. But no matter how they crunched the numbers, they got the same disappointing result. Flu shots have not reduced deaths among the elderly. It's not what health officials hope to find. NIH wouldn't let us interview the study's lead author, so we went to Boston and found the only co author not employed by NIH, doctor Tom Reichardt. Speaker 3: We realized that we had incendiary materials. Speaker 1: Doctor Reichardt says they thought their study would prove vaccinations had helped. Speaker 3: We, we were trying to do something mainstream. That's for sure. Speaker 1: Were you surprised? Astonished. Did you check the date a couple of times to make sure? Speaker 3: Well, even more than that, we've looked at other countries now. And the same is true. Speaker 1: That study, soon to be published, finds the same poor results in Australia, France, Canada, and The UK. And other new research stokes the idea that decades of promoting flu shots in seniors and the billions spent haven't had the desired result. The current head of national immunizations confirms CDC is now looking at new strategies, but stops short of calling the present policy a failure. Speaker 4: There's an active dialogue into how we can do better to prevent influenza and its complications in the elderly. Speaker 1: So what's an older person to do? The CDC says they should still get their flu shots, that it could make flu less severe or prevent other problems not reflected in the total numbers. But But watch for CDC to likely shift in the near future more toward protecting the elderly in a roundabout way by vaccinating more children and others around them who could give them the flu. Cheryl Atkinson, CBS News, Washington.
503 - Service Unavailable Error amazon.com
Saved - February 25, 2025 at 11:32 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The conversation began with a claim that increased flu vaccinations correlate with higher mortality rates, suggesting that vaccines are responsible for these deaths. The speaker criticized the pharmaceutical industry for allegedly manipulating research to favor vaccine sales, citing a lack of transparency among researchers. In response, another participant argued that hospital protocols, rather than the virus itself, are the main cause of fatalities, advocating for early treatment with alternative remedies like Ivermectin and Fenbendazole to improve survival rates.

@Inversionism - Inversionism

The more flu shots were given, the greater the mortality rates from the flu, found in every country they looked at. Instead of seeing the obvious in that vaccines were causing the increase in deaths, they went with the profit incentivized "roundabout" logic to increase vaccination rates in the people around them instead, like children... This was 2 decades ago... Vaccinology is pure pseudoscience and these corrupt pharma whore scientists are just manufacturing studies until they get the results they want, never looking into the bad results that would result in less shots being sold and question if the vaccine even works in the first place. The only researcher that would even talk to the reporter was the one that wasn't on NIH payroll. That tells you all you need to know about the quality and honesty of vaccine research. It's all fraud.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Over 20 years, flu shot rates among seniors rose from 15% to 65%, yet flu deaths continued to climb. An NIH study adjusting for various factors confirmed that flu shots haven't reduced deaths in the elderly. We were astonished by these findings, which hold true in other countries like Australia, France, Canada, and the UK. Despite billions spent, current research suggests flu shots in seniors haven't had the desired impact. The CDC is exploring new strategies but maintains that seniors should still get vaccinated, as it may lessen flu severity or prevent other complications. The CDC may shift towards vaccinating more children and others around seniors to protect them indirectly.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Here's what scientists have found. Over twenty years, the percentage of seniors getting flu shots increased sharply from fifteen percent to sixty five percent. It stands to reason that flu deaths among the elderly should have taken a dramatic dip, making an x graph like this. Instead, flu deaths among the elderly continue to climb. It was hard to believe, so researchers at the National Institutes of Health set out to do a study adjusting for all kinds of factors that could be masking the true benefits of the shots. But no matter how they crunched the numbers, they got the same disappointing result. Flu shots have not reduced deaths among the elderly. It's not what health officials hope to find. NIH wouldn't let us interview the study's lead author. So we went to Boston and found the only coauthor not employed by NIH, doctor Tom Reichert. Speaker 1: We realized that we had incendiary materials. Speaker 0: Doctor Reichert says they thought their study would prove vaccinations had helped. Speaker 1: We, we were trying to do something mainstream. That's for sure. Speaker 0: Were you surprised? Speaker 1: Astonished. Speaker 0: Did you check the data a couple of Speaker 1: times to make sure? Well, even more than that. We've looked at other countries now, and the same is true. Speaker 0: That study soon to be published finds the same poor results in Australia, France, Canada, and The UK. And other new research stokes the idea that decades of promoting flu shots in seniors and the billions spent haven't had the desired result. The current head of national immunizations confirmed CDC is now looking at new strategies, but stopped short of calling the present policy a failure. There's an active dialogue into how we can do better to prevent influenza and its complications in the elderly. So what's an older person to do? The CDC says they should still get their flu shots, that it could make flu less severe or prevent other problems not reflected in the total numbers. But watch for CDC to likely shift in the near future more toward protecting the elderly in a roundabout way by vaccinating more children and others around them who could give them the flu. Cheryl Atkinson, CBS News, Washington.

@ecomuaf - ecom 🇺🇸

@Inversionism Vaxxes or no, hospital protocols are what kills, not the virus. Put them on IVM and Fenben + any of a hundred other cheap remedies, early enough, and they'll all live. Just like every cold/flu season since records have been kept. Regardless of comorbidities.

Saved - March 2, 2025 at 4:44 AM

@stkirsch - Steve Kirsch

This can never be reposted enough. The NIH determined the flu vaccines don’t work so they ordered their scientists NOT to talk to the press. Please repost.

@SharylAttkisson - Sharyl Attkisson 🕵️‍♂️💼🥋

Why don't you know about this? That time a definitive govt. study concluded flu shots don't work in the elderly-- and didn't make a difference with mortality in any age group. The more of the elderly population that got flu shots, the more the death rate increased." NIH wouldn't give permission to any of the study authors to do an interview with me. Why? Step #2 of sending me down the rabbit hole on vaccines and govt. coverups. @RepThomasMassie Much more in my bestseller: Follow the $cience https://www.amazon.com/Follow-Science-Sharyl-Attkisson/dp/0063314916/ref=sr_1_1

Video Transcript AI Summary
We're taking a closer look at how to best protect seniors from the flu, especially since studies question the effectiveness of flu shots in older people. Despite mass vaccinations of the elderly and a sharp increase in seniors getting flu shots over the past 20 years, flu deaths among the elderly continue to climb. Research from the NIH and other countries reveals that flu shots haven't reduced deaths among the elderly. While the CDC confirms they're exploring new strategies and still recommends seniors get flu shots to lessen the flu's severity, the focus may shift towards vaccinating those around seniors to protect them indirectly.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The CDC is taking a closer look at how best to protect seniors from the flu. The agency is holding a symposium about that and other issues this week. It all follows a series of studies that question the effectiveness of flu shots given to older people. Here's Cheryl Atkinson with our report. Speaker 1: Millions of seniors swear by their annual flu shots. After all, ninety percent of people killed by the flu are 65 or older. That's perfect. But CBS News has learned that behind the scenes, public health officials have come to a new and disturbing conclusion. Mass vaccinations of the elderly haven't done the job. Doctor Walter Orenstein was among the first to notice the problem when he headed up the Centers for Disease Control's National Immunization Program. He says it's now become a consensus among public health experts. Speaker 2: What is absolutely clear is that there is still a substantial burden of deaths and hospitalizations out there that has not been prevented through the present strategy. Speaker 1: Here's what scientists have found. Over twenty years, the percentage of seniors getting flu shots increased sharply from fifteen percent to sixty five percent. It stands to reason that flu deaths among the elderly should have taken a dramatic dip, making an X graph like this. Instead, flu deaths among the elderly continue to climb. It was hard to believe, so researchers at the National Institutes of Health set out to do a study adjusting for all kinds of factors that could be masking the true benefits of the shots. But no matter how they crunched the numbers, they got the same disappointing result. Flu shots have not reduced deaths among the elderly. It's not what health officials hope to find. NIH wouldn't let us interview the study's lead author, so we went to Boston and found the only co author not employed by NIH, doctor Tom Reichardt. Speaker 3: We realized that we had incendiary materials. Speaker 1: Doctor Reichardt says they thought their study would prove vaccinations had helped. Speaker 3: We, we were trying to do something mainstream. That's for sure. Speaker 1: Were you surprised? Astonished. Did you check the date a couple of times to make sure? Speaker 3: Well, even more than that, we've looked at other countries now. And the same is true. Speaker 1: That study, soon to be published, finds the same poor results in Australia, France, Canada, and The UK. And other new research stokes the idea that decades of promoting flu shots in seniors and the billions spent haven't had the desired result. The current head of national immunizations confirms CDC is now looking at new strategies, but stops short of calling the present policy a failure. Speaker 4: There's an active dialogue into how we can do better to prevent influenza and its complications in the elderly. Speaker 1: So what's an older person to do? The CDC says they should still get their flu shots, that it could make flu less severe or prevent other problems not reflected in the total numbers. But But watch for CDC to likely shift in the near future more toward protecting the elderly in a roundabout way by vaccinating more children and others around them who could give them the flu. Cheryl Atkinson, CBS News, Washington.
503 - Service Unavailable Error amazon.com
Saved - October 19, 2025 at 12:31 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m checking how the flu shot is performing this year. The study shows cumulative influenza incidence rose faster among the vaccinated than the unvaccinated—does that mean it’s not working? Post 2: Study:

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

Let’s check in on how the flu shot is working this year. “over the course of the study the cumulative incidence of influenza increased more rapidly among the vaccinated than the unvaccinated.” Does that mean it working or no?

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

Study: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.01.30.25321421v3

Effectiveness of the Influenza Vaccine During the 2024-2025 Respiratory Viral Season medRxiv - The Preprint Server for Health Sciences medrxiv.org
Saved - April 18, 2025 at 11:18 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared insights on how the pandemic was manipulated for power, detailing staged events, misleading statistics, and psychological tactics used to instill fear. I discussed the false narratives around asymptomatic spread, the inflation of COVID death counts, and the suppression of effective treatments to promote vaccines. The media played a crucial role in perpetuating panic, while dissent was silenced. Ultimately, I argued that the pandemic served as a pretext for a broader agenda, reshaping society under elite control, rather than focusing on public health.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

🧵HOW THEY CREATED THE FAKE PANDEMIC They fooled the world, crashed economies, censored truth, and rewrote science overnight. Here's exactly how they turned fear, lies, and propaganda into the greatest power grab of our time. ⬇️ A THREAD ⬇️ https://t.co/4wWONfONjy

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

1. Staged Wuhan Panic: China kicked off the scare with choreographed "collapse in the street" videos. People dramatically keeling over in Wuhan, something never seen elsewhere. Even WHO called these collapses "atypical." It was pure psy-op theater to ignite global fear. https://t.co/v7vaoBXXM4

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

2. Bogus PCR cases: A phony testing regime built the “casedemic.” The German cirologist @c_drosten introduced a PCR test that can’t diagnose infection – cranked to excessive cycle thresholds so it flagged mostly false positives. Millions of healthy people were branded “dangerous COVID cases,” juicing the numbers to justify lockdowns.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

3. “Asymptomatic spread” myth: They pushed the lie that healthy people could silently infect others, to justify testing and restricting those with no symptoms. But there is no such thing as asymptomatic transmission. This was propaganda to lock down the healthy and mask toddlers. What many people don’t know is that the person who came up with the lie of asymptomatic transmission is the same one who created the COVID PCR protocol: the German virologist Christian Drosten.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

4. Coordinated Narrative Shift on COVID: On Feb 1, 2020, Fauci, Drosten, Andersen & others had a secret call. They admitted COVID might be lab-made. Within days, they flipped, pushed the natural origin lie, and Andersen got millions in grants. Science was replaced with narrative. https://t.co/r4fqdyx9Ip

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

5. Weaponized psychology: Governments literally hired behavioral psychologists to crank up the fear. In the UK, the SPI-B team admit they used “unethical” fear tactics – one scientist called it “totalitarian… not ethical”​ – to increase compliance. Leaked documents show officials discussing how to frighten the public into obedience. This was a deliberate fear pandemic, not a viral one.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

6. Needed fake mortality: The sniffles were never going to kill enough people to sustain panic. To maintain the illusion of a deadly pandemic, they needed excess mortality data. So they cooked the books to create the appearance of mass death (see next points). COVID’s true infection fatality rate (~0.2% globally) is akin to a bad flu – so they had to inflate the body count by any means.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

7. Manufactured hysteria illness: Since “mild cold symptoms” wouldn’t deliver the death spike they needed, authorities terrorized everyone to trigger mass psychogenic illness – essentially people getting sick from fear​ via chronically elevated cortisol levels. These elevated levels suppress immunity; anxiety and lockdown harms caused spikes in deaths (heart attacks, overdoses) that they then counted as “COVID.” It was a self-fulfilling pandemic of fear.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

8. 24/7 media terror: They blasted fear propaganda non-stop. News tickers ran running death tolls, every hospital incident became front-page news, and worst-case models dominated headlines. Governments fed the panic with lurid warnings (Boris Johnson claiming “bodies piled high” if restrictions lifted). By design, the public was kept in a state of constant fear. Objective risk (median COVID age ~80) was ignored to create the impression anyone could drop dead tomorrow.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

9. Flu cases relabeled as COVID: Flu virtually disappeared. Instead of celebrating the end of flu, officials pretended it was due to COVID measures – an absurd lie while COVID supposedly ran rampant. They simply rebranded the flu (and other respiratory illnesses) as “COVID” to inflate the pandemic.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

10. Every death counted as COVID: If you died in a car crash but tested positive, it was marked as a COVID death. Guidelines said even if the cause was clearly unrelated, it still counted. Hospitals were told to list deaths as COVID if the patient had ever tested positive or was merely suspected. Even those who died within two weeks of a positive test were included. This wildly inflated the stats by labeling non-COVID deaths as COVID.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

11. Financial incentives to inflate deaths: Hospitals had a perverse monetary motive to jack up COVID diagnoses. In the US, thanks to emergency payouts, a COVID patient on a ventilator could bring in ~$40,000 – roughly triple the normal reimbursement. Medicare’s 20% bonus for COVID cases and ventilator bonuses meant big $$$ for hospitals that labeled patients as COVID and put them on vents. This incentivized over-treatment and even negligence (e.g. unnecessary venting with ~90% fatality once intubated). It literally paid to have more COVID deaths.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

12. Early treatments banned: They aggressively suppressed effective therapies to protect the vaccine rollout. Doctors using ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, or vitamin D were vilified. The Lancet published a fake HCQ study (later retracted) that halted global trials. Meanwhile, they pushed toxic and expensive remdesivir. Even monoclonal antibodies and IV vitamin C were restricted. Denying real treatment let patients worsen, driving deaths and fear, all to pave the way for their “miracle” vaccines.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

13. Fake hospital footage & crisis actors: Media showed us scenes of overflowing hospitals – often misleading or outright fake. Example: CBS News was caught using video of a packed Italian ICU while reporting on NYC’s COVID situation​, implying New York hospitals were overrun. They called it an “editing mistake.” Similar stunts happened worldwide (recycling old disaster photos, staging scenes). Meanwhile, many hospitals were actually so empty (elective care canceled) that nurses had time for TikTok dance videos. The “overwhelmed hospitals” narrative was largely a scripted show to panic the public.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

14. Draconian lockdowns with no benefit: They imposed China-style society-wide lockdowns – a blunt instrument never recommended in prior pandemic plans. Small businesses, schools, churches all shuttered by government decree. The result was a devastating economic and social harm, with no proven mortality benefit.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

15. “Vaccines are the only way out”: After stoking panic and crushing cures, they presented the magic solution – rushed mRNA vaccines. Self-proclaimed health experts like Bill Gates promised these experimental shots were 95% effective and safe, that vaccination would end the pandemic. Governments shoveled billions to Pharma and granted them blanket immunity from liability for any harms. They then coerced the public via mandates and “passport” systems. It was a massive human experiment, using fear to sell acceptance of a novel vaccine platform and to cement a new level of state and corporate control over individual bodies.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

16. Lies about vaccine efficacy: They did not hesitate to lie. The CDC Director herself falsely claimed “vaccinated people do not carry the virus”​ and won’t get sick. President Biden said “you’re not going to get COVID if you have these vaccinations.” These statements were patently false – breakthrough infections happened by the millions, and studies showed vaccinated individuals can spread COVID​. They knowingly oversold the vaccines to bully people into compliance, then kept changing the story (“you need a booster…actually 3 boosters…”). Fun fact: If you died within two weeks of a positive PCR test, you were counted as a COVID death — no questions asked. But if you died within two weeks of the vaccine? “Doesn’t count, it hadn’t kicked in yet.” One rule to inflate fear, another to protect the narrative.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

17. Goalposts forever shifting: Nothing was ever temporary. “15 days to slow the spread” turned into 15 months of restrictions​. They said masks were unnecessary – then mandated two masks. They said lockdowns would be one-time – then reimposed them repeatedly. They promised “herd immunity” at 70% vaccinated – then moved the target. Each time the public met one demand, authorities doubled back and added more, betraying every assurance. This psychological abuse kept societies off-balance and prolongued the emergency powers indefinitely.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

18. Crushing and punishing dissent: Any expert or citizen who questioned the narrative was attacked. High-profile scientists who proposed focused protection (the Great Barrington Declaration) were subjected to a secret campaign by NIH officials calling for a “quick and devastating takedown” of them​. Doctors who saved patients with ivermectin or other protocols were stripped of licenses. Online skeptic communities were purged from Facebook , Twitter, and YouTube. Whistleblowers (nurses, data analysts) faced gag orders. The establishment used character assassination and censorship to maintain the illusion of unanimous “Science” support, quashing debate through intimidation.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

19. Data rigging to promote vaccines: When vaccines rolled out, they manipulated statistics to credit them. In May 2021 the CDC quietly stopped tracking COVID cases among vaccinated people unless hospitalized or dead​. Tens of thousands of breakthrough infections disappeared from the data. By counting every case in unvaccinated but ignoring most in vaccinated, they fabricated a narrative that “almost only the unvaccinated” were getting sick. This was a blatant data trick to prop up vaccine efficacy and fuel scapegoating of the unvaccinated.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

20. Ever-changing variants to extend fear: Just as the original wave waned, they hyped new “variants of concern” – Alpha, Delta, Omicron – to keep fear alive, and then blamed it on the unvaccinated. Each variant became the next reason for booster shots and continued restrictions. Media dutifully pumped scary stories (“Delta hitting young people”, “Omicron evades immunity”) with little context. It was a moving target to prevent the public from relaxing. By the time people caught on that each variant was milder than advertised, another one was on the horizon. The endless variants ensured the panic carousel kept spinning.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

21. Excess mortality surged post-vaccination: After mass vaccination campaigns, excess deaths rose dramatically, and continue even now. Authorities blamed everything from heatwaves to gardening and “climate anxiety,” desperately avoiding the most obvious cause: the jab itself. https://t.co/E7pam6YzfC

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

22. Inventing "Long COVID": As vaccine injuries surged, authorities conveniently introduced "Long COVID", a vague, catch-all diagnosis. Its broad, ambiguous symptoms perfectly matched common post-vaccination side effects, masking the truth behind escalating injuries. https://t.co/Q7JvQbAOeO

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

23. Conveniently “ending” the pandemic: After three years of orchestrated chaos, they abruptly declared the crisis over – not because of any scientific breakthrough, but for political convenience. The WHO ended the global emergency in May 2023, even as excess mortality remained high. Suddenly, COVID coverage vanished. Leaders who imposed tyranny moved on to the next agenda (Ukraine, climate) without apology or accountability. The pandemic theater ended when its architects chose to shift focus — not when the virus faded. Now they want amnesty for terrorizing citizens for years.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

24. Engineered for the Great Reset: In sum, the “pandemic” was a planned global power grab – a pretext for a new world order. Consider that in October 2019, globalists (WEF/Gates) ran Event 201, a tabletop exercise simulating a coronavirus pandemic that crashes economies and prompts draconian measures​. Sound familiar? Just months later, COVID-19 hit and governments executed in lockstep the very playbook discussed. Klaus Schwab of the WEF openly called COVID-19 a “rare but narrow window” to impose the Great Reset of society. From lockdowns to digital IDs, the pandemic fulfilled a wish-list of authoritarian controls. This was never about public health – it was about exploiting a virus to restructure society under elite rule. The “fake pandemic” narrative has been proven by each of these hard facts, and history will remember it as one of the greatest frauds ever perpetrated. Thank you for reading this thread and please give it a share and me a follow if you found it informative. Much appreciated.

Video Transcript AI Summary
As a young generation, we are grateful to penetrate cabinets. The change can be shaped by us. We have to prepare for a more angry world by taking action to create a fairer world. I see the need for a great reset. People assume we are just going back to the good old world, but this is fiction. It will not happen. There is only one way this pandemic is going to go: it's going to get worse and worse and worse. The next crisis is already waiting for us, and it is the climate crisis.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: As a young generation like prime minister Trudeau, half of this cabinet are actually young noble leaders of the world are grateful. We penetrate the cabinets. The change is not just happening. The change can be shaped by us. We have to prepare for a more angry world. How to prepare? Take the necessary action to create a fairer world. I see the need for a great reset. So people assume we are just going back to the good old world which we had and everything will be normal again. This is, let's say, fiction. It will not happen. Speaker 1: There is only one way this pandemic is going to go. It's going to get worse and worse and worse. Speaker 0: The next crisis is already waiting for us around the coma, and it is the climate crisis.
View Full Interactive Feed