reSee.it - Related Post Feed

Saved - September 28, 2023 at 8:22 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Governments and corporations are accused of deliberately lying about Covid vaccines, leading to fraud and mass negligent homicide. Data suggests vaccinated individuals are more prone to infection, disease, and death. Pfizer admitted their vaccine wasn't tested for transmission prevention. US doctors warn against vaccines, citing toxicity and harm to vital organs. Physicians demand legal action against vaccine manufacturers for withholding safety information. A US cardiologist claims vaccines are causing deaths. Media, CDC, NIH, and FDA are accused of illegal advertising. Fauci and Gates are implicated in a global fraud. This deliberate plan must not go unpunished. Justice must prevail.

@SpartaJustice - Truth Justice ™

SAFE AND EFFECTIVE LIES: 17,000 Scientists and Physicians confirm that Governments around the world along with Corporations willfully and deliberately lied to humanity about the Covid vaccines. They must be charged with fraud, wrongful advertising and mass negligent homicide. The data now shows that the Covid vaccinated are more likely to become infected or have disease or even death if they have been Vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated people. The Covid Vaccines damage your heart, brain, reproductive tissue, lungs, increase cancer and permanently damage your immune system. The European Parliament asked Pfizer this direct question. "Was the Pfizer Covid Vaccine tested on stopping the transmission of the virus before it entered the market?" Janine Small, a Pfizer President replied "NO" we had to really move at the speed of science to really understand what is taking place in the market. At that point of view we had to do everything at risk." They risked your lives deliberately for nothing and lied to you. The United States Government is captured by Corporations. U.S. Doctors warn the world to stop taking the Covid Vaccines and Boosters, they are toxic, lethal, ineffective and must be stopped. They damage the brain, heart, liver, bone marrow and fetus causing all sorts of harm in the human body. The CDC and the FDA misinformation is causing death and injury in pregnant women and newborn babies around the world. 17,000 Physicians and Scientists demand that Pfizer, Moderna, BioNTech, Janssen, AstraZeneca and their enablers be immediately indicted for fraud for willfully withholding and omitting Covid Vaccine safety information from patients and physicians which led to toxic death and injury to thousands of innocent people around the world. There is excess mortality and death all over the world and populations are suddenly collapsing. A top U.S. Cardiologist says I'm going to be very clear about this. The Vaccine is Killing people and it's Killing large numbers of people. The CDC has over 16,000 Americans that have died within a few days of taking the vaccine and that's probably a gross underreporting. The public must demand criminal charges for illegal advertising by the Media, the CDC, NIH, FDA all which advertised the Covid Vaccines as safe and effective with no side effects. They deliberately broke the law and committed federal crimes of fraud, wrongful advertising and mass negligent homicide. All government officials and all corporate executives must be indicted and brought to justice. Anthony Fauci and Bill Gates were two of the main criminals in this global fraud of wrongful advertising and mass negligent homicide perpetrated upon billions of innocent people around the world. Everyone involved must be punished for their deliberate crimes against humanity. We must get justice in order for this to never happen again. They must be made an example of what happens to you when you deliberately break the law. This was not a mistake, this was a deliberate orchestrated plan to deceive you and manipulate you into taking a toxic experimental injection that was never given to humans before. Millions are injured and millions are dead. This is a global crime that must not go unpunished. Justice must be met, no matter what.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims that the genetic COVID-19 injections are more harmful than beneficial, especially for young and healthy individuals. They argue that the vaccines do not reduce COVID-19 infection and can actually increase the risk of infection, disease, and death compared to the unvaccinated. They also mention potential damage to the heart, brain, reproductive tissue, lungs, and immune system. Another speaker questions the testing of the Pfizer COVID vaccine and demands data from the committee. The response states that the vaccine was not tested for stopping transmission before entering the market. There are also concerns raised about the vaccines causing harm to women of reproductive age and unborn babies. The transcript ends with discussions about potential fraud and wrongful advertising related to the vaccines.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We must acknowledge that the genetic COVID nineteen genetic injections cause far more harm than good and provide zero benefit relative to risk for the young and healthy. They do not reduce COVID nineteen infection, which is treatable and not terminal. Furthermore, the most recent data demonstrates that you are more likely to become infected or have disease or even death if you've been vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated people. This is shocking to hear, but it is what the data are showing us. The data now show that these experimental gene therapy treatments can damage your children as well as yourself. It can damage your heart, your brain, your reproductive tissue, and your lungs. This can include permanent damage and disablement of your immune system. Speaker 1: Was the Pfizer COVID vaccine Tested on stopping the transmission of the virus before it entered the market. If not, please Clearly, if yes, are you willing to share the data with this committee? And I really want straight answer, yes or no, and I'm looking forward to it. Speaker 2: Regarding the question around, did we know about stopping humanization before, it's entered the market? No. These, you know, we had to really move at the speed of science to really understand what is taking place in the And from that point of view, we had to do everything at risk. Speaker 3: I really do believe that the federal government is captured As captured by corporate interests, the entire US population as well as the world has to understand they can no longer take these COVID vaccines. These are, they are toxic and lethal to an end ineffective that they have completely failed. They can only be viewed It is harmful and they need to Speaker 4: be stopped. And does it damage the brain? You bet it does. Is it damage to the heart? Yes. The liver? Yes. The bone marrow? Yes. It causes all sorts The harm in the human body. We should have stopped this before it ever started. Speaker 5: It's a misinformation from the CDC, the FDA, the American Board of The American college of a GYN, the society of the Patients, it is causing a lot of death and injury in my women of reproductive age, my pregnant women, and my pre Born babies and it's gotta stop and it's gotta stop now. Speaker 4: And for the vaccines broadly, we have no idea Yeah. What's gonna happen long term now that they're in the body? Studies suggest that the vaccines and the spike protein that's produced from them never Speaker 5: The the first and most important thing, don't take any more vaccines. Don't take any more boosters. Do not take any More of these dangerous experimental therapies. Speaker 6: Dear colleagues And supporters, we declare that Pfizer, Moderna, BioNTech, Janssen and AstraZeneca And their enablers willfully withheld and admitted crucial safety and effectiveness information From patients and physicians and should be immediately indicted for fraud. We know that shortly after administration of these products, Thousands of people have died. And although correlation isn't causation, reasonable criteria have been applied To examine the relationship between injections and the events and is absolutely clear cut that these are the cause of death. Mechanistically, the design of these products was knowingly deficient in a number of ways. First, They caused the expression in the human body of toxic virus spike protein. Unlike what They told us that it would stay in the injection site. They distribute widely around the body. There was no built in limit to the amount of toxic spike Protein that can be made or for how long it is made. That's the cause of the toxicity. Turning to the clinical trials, there There is evidence of questionable practices all around. For example, several of the studies were clearly unblinded while they were ongoing Contrary to best practice and also in a number of cases, subjects were removed from the database prior to statistical analysis In a way that is suggestive of fraud. We were given blanket assurances time and again by all of the companies about benign safety profile of their products. Even as the products rolled out in the earliest weeks, they must have known this Was not true. To add insult to injury, it appears that these products provide little Well, no protection from the virus that they sought to protect us from. Speaker 7: Two questions get asked when people have hesitancy or reluctance to get vaccinated. Did you go too quickly is the first. The answer to that is the speed was a reflection of extraordinary scientific Advances and did not compromise safety nor did it compromise scientific integrity. The next Question is, okay, but what about the fact, is it really safe and is it really effective? Or is this Something the government is trying to put over on us. Is this something the companies want to take advantage of? Well, Well, let's take a look at what's happened over the past few months. Speaker 4: I'm going to be very clear about this and I've recently just testified in the US Senate December 7, 2022. The vaccine is killing people and it's killing large numbers of people. It fulfills all the criteria for the Bradford Hill tenets of causality For, a medicinal product causing death, our CDC as of December 23, 2022 has over 1000 Americans that have died within a few days of taking the vaccine. Yeah. And that's probably a gross under report. Speaker 8: We don't know if these vaccines will work. We don't know if they'll work to avoid deaths. We don't know if they'll work to avoid transmission. That's why we're working on so many 1st generation vaccines. Speaker 2: How do we know if these vaccines are working? Speaker 8: You'd like it to be very safe In all the populations, that you indicated for no side effects and then you'd like it to avoid the individuals who gets the vaccine getting sick. Speaker 4: So where are the criminal charges going to, first come? I think the easy ones to go after are illegal advertising. The vaccines have been advertised by the CDC, The NIH, FDA, DHS, and the vaccine companies as safe and effective. Americans know they can't do that. The vaccines have to be presented with risks and benefits Including fatal myocarditis, blood clots, and neurologic damage. We haven't seen that on TV. That violates the Lanvin Act, the Truth in Advertising Act, US Drug and Cosmetic That that is an easy conviction for wrongful advertising of all those entities. That means government entities being called For malfeasance or wrongdoing. And then beyond that, the big charges are fraud. America has been defrauded in so many aspects of pandemic response.
Saved - October 12, 2023 at 1:58 PM

@DC_Draino - DC_Draino

I received this horrifying message from a follower today A healthy father played 18 holes of golf without any complaints, got the Pfizer vax at 3:30 PM, and was dead by 6 PM People need to be thrown in jail for this Enough is enough

Saved - October 24, 2023 at 10:54 AM

@junogsp7 - Tom Moore

Pfizer knew within 90 days of rollout that their experimental mRNA gene 🧬 therapy vaccine 💉 was damaging human bodies but proceeded full speed ahead with their goal of a jab in every arm .

Saved - November 16, 2023 at 2:36 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
As a taxi driver, I had a conversation with a physician who shared unsettling experiences related to the mRNA injections. He mentioned the correlation between high vaccine uptake and excess mortality. We discussed the surge in sudden cancers and the potential role of plasmid DNA. The physician expressed frustration at not being able to speak out due to fear of losing his license. We both felt helpless in the face of these issues. It is crucial to allow medical professionals to seek answers and engage in scientific debate to understand the causes of adverse events.

@BlaineFode - Blaine Fode

Tales from the taxi: As a taxi driver I've had the great fortune of speaking with people from all walks of life and professions. I'm perpetually exposed to different viewpoints and information I might never have heard otherwise. It was just last week that I had a long conversation with a physician that proved to be very unsettling. At first, I didn't know his profession. He was a soft spoken and serious individual. We talked about the local wildfires, and the hassle many of my displaced clients have had with insurance companies. From there I mentioned the oddity of health insurance companies losing money for the first time that I could remember- especially in the younger age brackets. Something I was familiar with through the work of former BlackRock hedge fund manager, @DowdEdward "I wonder what that could be about?" He sarcastically drawled. Dowd's work pointed to the mRNA injections as the culprit since the highest disability rates are found among working age, and therefore the mandated cohorts, who experienced a massive rise in injuries and death. I pointed this out, and my client immediately relaxed. "I know, I know," he said. "It is just like the excess mortality. The countries with the highest vaccine uptake have the highest excess mortality." I told him about BC's excess mortality- data which I had to compile myself from the BC gov'ts monthly death numbers- which show at the height of covid we had an 8% excess mortality, and ever since the rollout of the shots, have been oscillating between 20 and 30%. I told him how I sent this data to the MP, MLA, and office of public health, and none of them were interested. "More people are dying right now than at the height of covid," I said, "and they don't have an explanation. Do you remember the news during covid? Cases and Deaths on a daily ticker- you couldn't escape it, and now they suddenly don't care about more deaths! No explanation whatsoever. I sent them the birth data too, which showed a baby bump of 1.4% during the lockdowns, but 9 months post rollout the birth rate plummets almost 10% below the 5 year average and it has not come back up!" "I know. It is insane," he said. "So I am a physician, and I can tell you all of this is happening. I have seen it. I have 3 women in their 30's in good health. I've given them check ups for years. All three of them had strokes after their shots. Strokes! I had a woman in her 70's whose cancer had been in remission for 20 years. Suddenly the cancer came back, stage 4, and she died within the month. The only thing that changed was she got her vaccines."  He went on at some length about a multitude of other patients with sudden health complications. The more he spoke the more his calm demeanor faltered.  I asked him if he had heard about the plasmid DNA and SV(simian virus)40 promoters that @Kevin_McKernan, a leader of the human genome project, recently found. [A discovery that has since been acknowledged by Health Canada] I mentioned the speculation that this could be a likely pathway for the surge in sudden cancers being observed. He told me he was familiar with it, and went into some depth about the plausibility of the plasmid DNA being transcribed into the human genome, and how it could corrupt the cells natural anti-cancer mechanisms, among other things. I told him I had the pleasure of having @MakisMD, an albertan oncologist, on our podcast who told me about the "turbo-cancers" being observed around the world. Dr. Makis informed me that certain cancers don't occur in young people, historically. Like colon cancer, which takes 40-50 years before emerging, and now they are seeing 20 year olds diagnosed with late stage colon cancer out of the blue. The physician told me he was well aware. That he followed all of this closely but now wanted to stop. "I want to bury my head in the sand. It is just too much," he said. "I am seriously on the verge of having a mental breakdown." "Why?" I asked.

@BlaineFode - Blaine Fode

His eyes wobbled with tears- this man of calm and measured words, of science and logic, was breaking down in the back of my cab. "Because I am not allowed to say anything about it, or the government will take my license. I'm being torn apart by this. I am the only provider for my family, and so I have to choose them- but every day I have to face the morality of that decision. What can I do? Seriously, what can I do?" And he was genuinely asking me, a cab driver, for a solution. As if I knew another way. As if I could help. His sincerity and desperation drove me to tear up, and we were then just two men who knew something terrible was happening, and both felt helpless to change it.  I wanted to tell him to muster courage, to do the right thing. To give him a platitude about what example he would want to set for his children, what he would tell them to do if they were ever in such a bind, but how could I? I have never sacrificed 7 years to study medicine, I don't have a dependent family, and I risk nothing in my expression but vitriol and a bad tip. "I don't know, but speaking out seems like the only way this changes." "I envy you," he said, "keep doing what you are doing, keep talking about this." "But it is people like you who need to be heard, I'm just a cabby, I have no authority on the subject." "Yet I have the authority, but I cannot speak." And that was where we left it, and this story is all I can give. So I'll leave you here, to contemplate what our world, our province, has become. Under Bill C-36, our doctors cannot provide their expert opinion. Their experience and education are secondary to political dogmas espoused by bureaucrats. What, I ask, will be the point of a 'Second Opinion' when it must be the same prescription as the first? What is science when debate is not allowed, when consensus is stated rather than tested? Are we in less danger when whistleblowers are muzzled? Will the injured be able to find accountability, if wrong doing can never be pointed out or acknowledged? 1000 extra of us British Columbians are dying every month without explanation. Should our health care professionals be allowed to seek the reason why? Without the why, how can they begin to treat the cause? It is no secret that we are short on medical staff, but who would want to practice in an environment such as this? Around the world politicians are beginning to stand up as they listen to concerned scientists and doctors. Recently the British MP Andrew Bridgen and New Zealand MP Liz Gunn have both made waves with powerful testimony about this very issue. We desperately need this sort of discourse in Canada. To the vaccine injured, know that you are not alone. That almost daily I hear stories of people or their family members who insist the shots they received caused their malady or expiration. Some I drive to the hospital, some to the cancer clinic. I constantly hear about  miscarriages, stillbirths, strokes, myocarditis, pericarditis, blood clots, chronic headaches, neurodegeneration, lethargy, brain fog, skin conditions, seizures, sudden deaths, and cancers - all attributed to the jabs. Like everyone, I pray this it is not the case, but something is afoot and we deserve to know what. We need our experts and scientific debate if we are to ever know the answers to these questions- even if what they find is uncomfortable.

Saved - December 2, 2023 at 10:06 AM

@robinmonotti - Robin Monotti

"People were dying almost straight away after being injected.." New Zealand Covid19 "vaccine" database administrator. https://t.co/xoCsZC9Qkt

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses their involvement in building a vaccine payment system and noticing discrepancies in the data regarding deaths occurring shortly after vaccination. They explain their unique position as the sole database administrator in New Zealand and their ability to access and analyze the information. The speaker shares a chart showing the top ten batches with high death counts and mentions a website where people can find their batch information. They also highlight the high mortality rates among certain vaccinators. The speaker questions the reasons behind these deaths and emphasizes that the vaccine is meant to protect people. They analyze a timeline of deaths in New Zealand, noting spikes during flu seasons and the impact of COVID-19. The speaker concludes that the death rate in New Zealand has increased even after COVID-19.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Right. Well, I was involved with building a project, helped with, implementing a vaccine payment system for our providers. It's called, a pay per dose system. So it means that every time someone gets vaccinated, they get They get a payment for it as a provider. And I helped build it. I implemented it. And when I was looking at the data, which is part of my job, I noticed some discrepancies with the dates, of death, people getting people dying within a week of being vaccinated. Speaker 1: So what did you notice when you first started to look At this data as you were building it? Speaker 0: Well, as soon as the system went live, we noticed that, people would die almost straight away after being injected. So That sort of prompted my curiosity a bit, and so I dug a little deeper. And I am a scientist by nature. I I love science. It's My all time favorite. I've got a I've got a master's degree in science. Oh, no but no one knows this data. Nobody but me in New Zealand has seen this data. Now I'm giving it to the world. Speaker 1: Explain why. Explain that. Speaker 0: Because it's a it's a payment system, and I'm the database administrator for it. I'm the only one. Because New Zealand is a small country, you can get away with 1 database administrator to do this. So I'm in a unique position in the world. And because New Zealand is a tier one country with really good IT, I was able to manage and build the system and as be the only database administrator needed to look after it. In other countries like America or Britain, you'd need a whole team of people. So it'd be very difficult for 1 person to get access to all of this information. But in New Zealand, because of the size and because it's got really good IT, I happen to be the the one. Speaker 1: A lot of people want to know what was my batch? What can you do to help keep us with that? Speaker 0: Okay. So what I did with the data was, look at the top Ten, batches that were had a high death count, a high mortality rate. And I put them on a chart, which you can see up there. So it's got a a batch ID, which is our internal number for a batch, but You can easily get the Pfizer batch ID from that. It shouldn't be too difficult. Speaker 1: Tell us more about that because a lot of people will say, hey, that's only the top Tien, I want to know my batch. What would you advise? Speaker 0: Yep. You can do that. There's, there's a website, find my batch for the whole world that can actually find that. And I we can list this on, a website, the whole number of batches. There are 119 individual batches Just so far, New Zealand, a 119 Speaker 1: Of the Pfizer? Speaker 0: Of the Pfizer. Actually, not of all of them because we have We have Moderna. We have AstraZeneca. We've but they're only few and far between. Mostly, it's Pfizer. Mostly, it's Pfizer in New Zealand. Speaker 1: So people can find that? Yep. Find my batch? Speaker 0: Yes. They should be able to. Speaker 1: Yes. Hello? Speaker 0: So what I did was our internal batch ID, I counted the number of vaccinated within that batch, and then I found out who was dead. Speaker 1: Well, let's have a look. Speaker 0: And so we then look at the percentage of the ratio. Speaker 1: So do we know if these are all Pfizer, the top 10? Speaker 0: Yes, they are. Speaker 1: And this is Pfizer's batch number 1. We've had 711 from batch number 1 vaccinated. 152 of those died, which makes a 21% Speaker 0: death There are different ways to look at the data. You can slice it and dice it. So another way I looked at it was, are the vaccinators themselves, what are they doing? Are we looking at some who I've got a higher mortality rate than those. And sure enough, if we look at the next one, Unfortunately, there are. So what we have here are the top 10 vaccinators Who have the highest ratios of mortality? Speaker 1: For privacy reasons, We have redacted the names of those jabbed and the names of those jabbed. Speaker 0: We have to. Speaker 1: We have. Yeah. So we've just called it Vaccinator 1? Speaker 0: Yeah. But these are individuals. These are real people. These are real numbers. This is government data. So the top v one This vaccine added 246 people, and 60 of them are no longer with us. Speaker 1: That is nearly 25%. One in 4. Speaker 0: Nearly 1 in 4 that that person's vaccinated is dying dead. And you can come up with any number of reasons for it, But this should never happen. This should never happen. If they were all doing their job correctly, if there's a normal vaccine, But we point 7. Speaker 1: And if you were arguing, okay, there was 1 vaccinator who was incompetent, not doing the job properly, That's an aberration, but look at the other numbers. Yeah. So it looks then we start to say, what is it they were putting into people's bodies? Because the uniformity is what they were putting in. Look at this one. 621 by vaccinated, the 3rd highest Vaccinated. 621, 104 people dead, nearly 17% of the people they jabbed. Speaker 0: Yes. And unless they they go around, terribly ill cancer wards and injecting people, who they know are gonna die, Then there is no other explanation for this then, and why would they give them that anyway? You know? It doesn't make any sense. The vaccine is meant to Protect those people. On the left there, the big red line, is the Christchurch earthquake event. So that is the outlier, and that's A lot of people died on that day. From there, the next line where you get more than a 120 people dying is sometime 2012. Then you get nothing for a year. 2013 doesn't have any. 2014, you got a couple. Then nothing. 2016, you got 1. Then nothing until 2018 where you get A whole bunch of whole cluster, that's probably due to a flu epidemic because always these spikes that you see, these black lines previously on the left hand side, They're all due to the winter flu season, so you gotta remember that. They all all these deaths happened June, July, August. So there in 2018, we had a a big flu epidemic. Moving on to the right, we got another one. Then The next red one, the Christchurch massacre, which was in 2019 in March. But from that, you get a a cluster in 2020, a whole bunch there. May have been another bad flu season. We don't know. But then from 2021, you see A black line there appearing, and then it's like a flick of a switch. Suddenly, the black lines get closer together, And there's more of them. Very thick black lines there. So this this one here, Peak deaths was COVID with or from COVID, but then the deaths from COVID, if you look at the Worldometer website, it correlates to that. That was the same time, and they said that over 60 people died with or from COVID. Then after that, it suddenly suddenly drops off. So after that, you only get a couple of people a day dying with or from COVID. So if you if you go back to The chart there, in that case, you would you would expect to see the black lines disappear because no one's dying from COVID anymore. Right? But you're not. Yeah. Absolutely not. You're seeing the black lines. There are more people dying than ever before. These are the biggest number of deaths we've seen in history of New Zealand. The death rate has gone up 6%, 8% year on year. Even after COVID wasn't a thing. The death rate is still going up. And that's illustrated here by these black lines which are still going on.
Saved - March 25, 2024 at 7:33 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Governments and corporations lied about Covid vaccines, causing harm and death. Vaccinated individuals are more likely to be infected and suffer health issues. Pfizer admitted to not testing vaccine transmission. US doctors warn against vaccines, citing toxicity and ineffectiveness. 17,000 scientists demand fraud charges against vaccine manufacturers. Vaccines are killing people, with underreported deaths. Media, CDC, NIH, and FDA committed federal crimes by falsely advertising vaccine safety. Fauci and Gates are responsible and must face consequences. This was a deliberate plan to deceive and manipulate. Justice must be served.

@SpartaJustice - Truth Justice ™

SAFE AND EFFECTIVE LIES: 17,000 Scientists and Physicians confirm that Governments around the world along with Corporations willfully and deliberately lied to humanity about the Covid vaccines. They must be charged with fraud, wrongful advertising and mass negligent homicide. The data now shows that the Covid vaccinated are more likely to become infected or have disease or even death if they have been Vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated people. The Covid Vaccines damage your heart, brain, reproductive tissue, lungs, increase cancer and permanently damage your immune system. The European Parliament asked Pfizer this direct question. "Was the Pfizer Covid Vaccine tested on stopping the transmission of the virus before it entered the market?" Janine Small, a Pfizer President replied "NO" we had to really move at the speed of science to really understand what is taking place in the market. At that point of view we had to do everything at risk." They risked your lives deliberately for nothing and lied to you. The United States Government is captured by Corporations. U.S. Doctors warn the world to stop taking the Covid Vaccines and Boosters, they are toxic, lethal, ineffective and must be stopped. They damage the brain, heart, liver, bone marrow and fetus causing all sorts of harm in the human body. The CDC and the FDA misinformation is causing death and injury in pregnant women and newborn babies around the world. 17,000 Physicians and Scientists demand that Pfizer, Moderna, BioNTech, Janssen, AstraZeneca and their enablers be immediately indicted for fraud for willfully withholding and omitting Covid Vaccine safety information from patients and physicians which led to toxic death and injury to thousands of innocent people around the world. There is excess mortality and death all over the world and populations are suddenly collapsing. A top U.S. Cardiologist says I'm going to be very clear about this. The Vaccine is Killing people and it's Killing large numbers of people. The CDC has over 16,000 Americans that have died within a few days of taking the vaccine and that's probably a gross underreporting. The public must demand criminal charges for illegal advertising by the Media, the CDC, NIH, FDA all which advertised the Covid Vaccines as safe and effective with no side effects. They deliberately broke the law and committed federal crimes of fraud, wrongful advertising and mass negligent homicide. All government officials and all corporate executives must be indicted and brought to justice. Anthony Fauci and Bill Gates were two of the main criminals in this global fraud of wrongful advertising and mass negligent homicide perpetrated upon billions of innocent people around the world. Everyone involved must be punished for their deliberate crimes against humanity. We must get justice in order for this to never happen again. They must be made an example of what happens to you when you deliberately break the law. This was not a mistake, this was a deliberate orchestrated plan to deceive you and manipulate you into taking a toxic experimental injection that was never given to humans before. Millions are injured and millions are dead. This is a global crime that must not go unpunished. Justice must be met, no matter what.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers express concerns about the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines, alleging that they can cause harm and death. They question the transparency of vaccine trials and accuse companies of withholding crucial information. The speakers call for criminal charges against organizations for fraud and wrongful advertising, claiming that vaccines have led to deaths. They emphasize the need to stop taking vaccines and boosters immediately.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We must acknowledge that the genetic COVID 19 genetic injections cause far more harm than good and provide zero benefit relative to risk for the young and healthy. They do not reduce COVID 19 infection, which is treatable and not terminal. Furthermore, the most recent data demonstrates that you are more likely to become infected or have disease or even death if you've been vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated people. This is shocking to hear, but it is what the data are showing us. The data now show that these experimental gene therapy treatments can damage your children as well as yourself. They can damage your heart, your brain, your reproductive tissue, and your lungs. This can include permanent damage and disablement of your immune system. Speaker 1: Was the Pfizer COVID vaccine tested on stopping the transmission of the virus before it entered the market? If not, please say it clearly. If yes, are you willing to share the data with this committee? And I really want straight answer, yes or no, and I'm looking forward to it. Thank you very much. Speaker 2: Regarding the question around, did we know about stop and humanization before it sent to the market? No. These, you know, we had to really move at the speed of science to really understand what is taking place in the market. And from that point of view, we had to do everything at risk. Speaker 3: I really do believe that the federal government is captured. It's captured by corporate interests. The entire US population as well as the world has to understand they can no longer take these COVID vaccines. These are they are toxic and lethal to an end ineffective that they have completely failed. They can only be viewed as harmful and they need to be stopped. And, does it damage the brain? You bet it does. Does it damage the heart? Yes. The liver? Yes. The bone marrow? Yes. It causes all sorts of harm in the human body. We should have stopped this before it ever started. Speaker 4: It's a misinformation from the CDC, the FDA, the American Board of Obstetrics and Speaker 3: Gynecology, the American College of OBGYN, the Society of Internal Revenue Speaker 5: of Medicine. Speaker 4: It's a misinformation from those organizations Speaker 3: that is causing a lot of death and injury in my women of reproductive age, my pregnant women, and my pre born babies, and it's gotta stop and it's gotta stop now. Speaker 6: And for the vaccines broadly, we have no idea what's gonna happen long term now that they're in the body. Studies suggest that the vaccines and the spike protein that's produced from them never leaves the human body. Speaker 4: The the first and most important thing, don't take any more vaccines. Don't take any more boosters. Do not take any more of these experimental therapies. Speaker 5: Dear colleagues and support us, we declare that Pfizer, Moderna, BioNTech, Janssen and AstraZeneca and their enablers willfully withheld and omitted crucial safety and effectiveness information from patients and physicians and should be immediately indicted for fraud. We know that shortly after administration of these products, thousands of people have died. And although correlation isn't causation, reasonable criterion have been applied to examine the relationship between injections and the events, and it is absolutely clear cut that these are the cause of death. Mechanistically, the design of these products was knowingly deficient in a number of ways. First, they caused the expression in the human body of toxic virus spike protein. Unlike what they told us that it would stay in the injection site, they distribute widely around the body. There was no built in limit to the amount of toxic spike protein that can be made or for how long it is made. And that's the cause of the toxicity. Turning to the clinical trials, there is evidence of questionable practices all around. For example, several of the studies were clearly unblinded while they were ongoing contrary to best practice. And also, in a number of cases, subjects were removed from the database prior to statistical analysis in a way that is suggestive of fraud. We were given blanket assurances time and again by all of the companies about the benign safety profile of their products. Even as the products rolled out in the earliest weeks, they must have known this was not true. To add insult to injury, it appears that these products provide little or no protection from the virus that they sought to protect us from. Speaker 7: Two questions get asked when people have hesitancy or reluctance to get vaccinated. Did you go too quickly is the first. The answer to that is the speed was a reflection of extraordinary scientific advances and did not compromise safety nor did it compromise scientific integrity. The next question is, okay, but what about the fact, is it really safe and is it really effective? Or is this something the government is trying to put over on us? Is this something the companies wanna take advantage of? Well, let's take a look at what's happened over the past few months. Speaker 6: I'm gonna be very clear about this, and I've recently just testified in the US Senate, December 7, 2022. The vaccine is killing people, and it's killing large numbers of people. It fulfills all the criteria for the Bradford Hill tenets of causality for a medicinal product causing death. Our CDC, as of December 23, 2022, has over 16 16,000 Americans that have died within a few days of taking the vaccine. Yeah. And that's probably a gross under report. Speaker 8: We don't know if these vaccines will work. We don't know if they'll work to avoid deaths. We don't know if they'll work to avoid transmission. That's why we're working on so many first generation vaccines. Speaker 2: How do we know if these vaccines are working? Speaker 8: We'd like it to be very safe in all the populations, that you indicated for, no side effects, and then you'd like it to avoid the individual who gets the vaccine getting sick. Speaker 6: So where are the criminal charges going to, first come? I think the easy ones to go after are illegal advertising. The vaccines have been advertised by the CDC, NIH, FDA, DHS, and the vaccine companies as safe and effective. Americans know they can't do that. The vaccines have to be presented with risks and benefits, including fatal myocarditis, blood clots, and neurologic damage. We haven't seen that on TV. That violates the LEMON Act, the Truth in Advertising Act, the US Drug and Cosmetic Act. That is an easy conviction for wrongful advertising of all those entities. That means government entities being called for malfeasance or wrongdoing. And then beyond that, the big charges are fraud. America has been defrauded in so many aspects of pandemic response. Lives have been lost, and I think the big ticket item will be mass negligent homicide. It's tying together wrongful advertising, defrauding the com the country, and then leading to dust, due to lack of early treatment and then vaccine induced dust.
Saved - April 27, 2024 at 7:24 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
In Alberta, pre-filled COVID shot syringes were used without informed consent, leading to recipients and immunizers being unaware of the vaccine being administered. Complaints were raised about this illegal practice, but no action was taken by the United Nurses of Alberta union. The use of pre-filled syringes goes against official policy, which states that immunizers should only administer vaccines they have prepared themselves. This issue extends beyond Alberta, as evidenced by a photo of pre-filled vaccination needles in Delta, B.C. Various healthcare organizations, government officials, and the media are implicated in the obstruction of justice regarding these mass assaults.

@dksdata - David Dickson

🚨 COVID SHOTS WITHOUT INFORMED CONSENT Pre-filled COVID shot syringes not drawn by the immunizer were used throughout Alberta in 2021. This meant neither the immunizer nor the recipient knew what they were being injected with. Statement from an Alberta Nurse in 2021 - buried by the Chief of Staff to the Alberta Justice Minister, Justice Minister, Public Safety Minister, Health Minister, Premier and their "Political Allies". “I was instructed to administer a prefilled syringe to clients with the apparent vaccine. I was told a team of Nurses and Pharmacists were doing the reconstitution of the Pfizer vaccine and it would help us with efficiency to give a preloaded syringe to save time of the immunizing Nurse not needing to mix and draw up their own vaccine” In May of 2021 the United Nurses of Alberta (UNA) union had a Zoom call where this practice of using pre-filled syringes was raised. During this call, it was confirmed that complaints had already been submitted about this illegal prectice. The Union did NOTHING and the illegal practice continued. This meant every single shot given this way was an assault. If you did not provide or obtain informed consent for this, you MUST speak up now. Alberta CMOH official policy on the use of pre-filled syringes for COVID shots in 2021 “immunizers must:” “Only administer the COVID-19 vaccine that they have drawn up and labelled themselves” "Suggested informed consent script: “Due to challenging vaccine storage and handling requirements, the best way to transport the vaccine to your home is in a prepared syringe. It is important to understand that transporting the vaccine this way has not been broadly studied and there is limited data regarding the stability of the vaccine transported in this way. Would you like to proceed with receiving an immunization from a prepared syringe for COVID 19 vaccine?” Healthcare Unions knew. Healthcare Colleges knew. Alberta Health knew. Alberta Health Services knew. Pharmacies knew. The Media knew. Ministers and MLA's (on both sides) knew. Freedom Lawyers knew. Each and every one is complicit in the obstruction of justice relating to mass assaults in Alberta. https://dksdata.com/BenefactBulletins https://dksdata.com/AlbertaDead#COMMUNICATIONS… https://dksdata.com/Benefact/Prefilledsyringe.pdf https://onehealth.ca/Portals/1/2021-02-04%20Prefilled%20Syringes%20COVID-19%20Immunization%20-%20Final.pdf… https://open.alberta.ca/dataset/58d31634-61d9-469d-b95f-f714719b923e/resource/3b73d911-8a68-444f-958e-87cfd54e88a9/download/prefilled-syringes-covid-19-policy.pdf https://ab.bluecross.ca/pdfs/Off-Site-Pre-Filled-Syringes-(PFS)-for-small-groups.pdf… https://ab.bluecross.ca/pdfs/Off-Site-Pharmacy-Immunization-Policy-APPROVED.pdf

404 - PAGE NOT FOUND dksdata.com
404 - PAGE NOT FOUND dksdata.com
404 - PAGE NOT FOUND dksdata.com

@dksdata - David Dickson

Not just Alberta. "Needles are seen filled with the vaccination for COVID-19 at a truck stop on highway 91 North in Delta, B.C., Wednesday, June 16, 2021. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Jonathan Hayward"

Saved - May 10, 2024 at 10:36 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Following a massive Pfizer push in North Dakota, EMT Harry Fisher witnessed a significant increase in negative effects. He describes spontaneous abortions, fatal heart attacks, and multiple deaths. Fisher's experiences, along with an ER doctor's retirement due to the situation, led him to believe that a potential genocide was occurring. Fisher also witnessed a patient in their 20s die of a heart attack after receiving the injection in Muscogee, Oklahoma. The sudden deaths were alarming and occurred shortly after the vaccine rollout.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

There was a "massive Pfizer push in North Dakota...We had so many miscarriages that I was calling people to come down and clean the chairs because they were having spontaneous abortions [and] there was too much blood...We were seeing massive carnage." EMT Harry Fisher (@HopiNg66966500) describes for Jim Ferguson (@JimFergusonUK) the "massive carnage" he witnessed following the rollout of the COVID injections on a native reservation in North Dakota. Fisher describes many sudden deaths, including spontaneous abortions and fatal heart attacks. Following a "massive Pfizer push in North Dakota" on a native reservation, Fisher says he and his colleagues "had to intubate our nurse manager, [who had] multiple blood clots in their lungs." The EMT adds, "We had so many miscarriages that I was calling people to come down and clean the chairs because they were having spontaneous abortions because there was too much blood." "One of the nurses I was working with lost her husband to a heart attack the day after his shot. That guy's brother died a week after after a heart attack, so we were seeing a lot of death," Fisher says. "So much death that the ER doctor that I was working with, she's since retired and told me she was retiring after this because she pulled me to the side and said, we are quote-unquote 'Experiencing genocide.'" Fisher says that he was "already thinking [a genocide] was possibly occurring" and that the ER doctor's opinion was "confirmation that we were in a world of hurt." "You do a massive push of this...experimental substance, and then within the next few weeks suddenly people were dropping dead, it was just so easy to see because it all happened right at the same time in a very small, populated area." Fisher notes that he also worked in Muscogee in Oklahoma, where he witnessed a patient in their 20s die of a heart attack following their injection. "I was working in an ER there [and] a patient in their 20s came in with chest pain and they pretty much dismissed that patient, and as the patient was walking out the door, because they were just thinking 20-year-olds don't have heart attacks, the person died at the door of the ER and we couldn't resuscitate them."

Video Transcript AI Summary
They witnessed a surge in adverse reactions after a mass vaccination campaign in North Dakota, including blood clots, miscarriages, and deaths. An ER doctor described it as genocide, prompting her retirement. The interviewer has spoken to experts who also share concerns about the situation. In Muskogee, a young patient died of a heart attack after being dismissed by medical staff.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We had to innovate it. Well, they did a massive Pfizer push in North Dakota. I was working in native reservation, and they did it all at the same time, so it was easy to see because they did it all at the same time. And we had to innovate our nurse manager, multiple blood clots in their lungs. We had so many miscarriages that I was calling people to come down and clean the chairs because they were having spontaneous abortions, because there was too much blood. My one of the nurses I was work working with lost her husband to a heart attack a day after his shot. That guy's brother died a week after of a heart attack. So we were seeing a lot of death, so much death that the that the ER doctor that I was working with, she since retired and told me she was retiring after this because she pulled me to the side and said, we are, quote, unquote, experiencing genocide. So to be pulled away by my ER doctor and be told something that I was already thinking was possibly occurring was just confirmation that we were in a world of hurt. Speaker 1: I I interview a lot of doctors, scientists, professors, data analysts, and and lots of very interesting, very clever, smart people here on this channel. And, I've asked them their opinions about a lot of these things. And many of them, many of them, probably the vast majority of them have independently said because I always ask them. I don't tend to give people my opinion necessarily. Although, if you've watched the channel, you'll probably know my opinion on it. But I like to give people the opportunity to say what what they think and and not be, you know, not be sort of manipulated into saying something just because I'm thinking it. But I think you're right. And I think the that that nursing, was it was she a nursing manager, did you say, or or or a head of department? Speaker 0: That was our ER doctor. Speaker 1: An ER doctor. Right? Speaker 0: Well Our ER doctor actually told me that that she thought it was genocide, pulled me aside, and said it. But our our nurse manage our, like, our nurse, lead, basically, we had to innovate her because multiple blood clots in her lungs. I mean, we were just we were seeing massive carnage. And North Dakota was one of the worst spots that I was in because it would all it pushed at the same time, so it was easier to see because it just you you do a a massive push of this, you know, experimental substance, and then within the next few weeks, suddenly people are dropping dead. And it it was just so easy to see because it all happened right at the same time in a very small small populated area. It wasn't as easy to see in other places, but it still was noticeable because of the how young the patient started started being. I mean, in in Muskogee, I was working in ER there, and the patient's, like, a 20 and a a person in their twenties came in with chest pain, and they pretty much dismissed the that patient. And as the patient was walking out the door because they were just thinking, you know, 20 year olds don't have heart attacks, the person died at the at the door of the ER, and we couldn't resuscitate them. Speaker 1: Good lord.
Saved - July 17, 2024 at 8:36 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The process of making vaccines can result in hot lots, leading to disastrous releases. @MidwesternDoc highlights numerous examples of unsafe vaccines being put on the market despite warnings, causing harm to Americans. Recognition and change are necessary.

@PierreKory - Pierre Kory, MD MPA

Making vaccines is a dirty process, so hot lots are inevitable, and as @MidwesternDoc shows, dozens of disastrous lots have been released over the decades. Because this has been buried, very few doctors recognized the hot COVID-19 lots. This must change. https://midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-century-of-forgotten-hot-lot

The Century of Forgotten Vaccine Hot Lot Disasters How the mantra of "safe and effective" has shielded countless compromised products from scrutiny and led to the same disasters continuously repeating. midwesterndoctor.com

@PierreKory - Pierre Kory, MD MPA

@MidwesternDoc If you read through the examples @MidwesternDoc provides, it is shocking how many times the government was warned a new vaccine was not safe to put onto the market (ie. because it was contaminated) but they nonetheless did and injured hundreds if not thousands of Americans.

Saved - July 20, 2024 at 6:10 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I compiled a timeline reflecting concerns about injuries and deaths linked to COVID vaccinations. Notable warnings began in December 2020 from Dr. Sucharit Bhakti, who described the vaccination effort as a dangerous experiment. Reports of adverse events surfaced early in 2021, including deaths in Norway shortly after vaccination. By May 2021, significant death tolls were reported in the U.S., while New Zealand authorities downplayed concerns despite similar incidents. By September 2023, data revealed thousands of adverse event reports in New Zealand, including deaths and serious conditions.

@c_plushie - Coronavirus Plushie

I was watching some old videos and thought I'd put together this brief timeline of injuries and deaths following the covid shots. 2 Dec 2020: Dr. Sucharit Bhakti warns, "I think it's downright dangerous and I warn you, if you go along these lines you are going to go to your doom." 18 Dec 2020: Again, Dr. Dr. Sucharit Bhakti, "This is the hugest experiment that has ever been done on people in the history of medicine." 11 Jan 2021: @delbigtree, "I've said that I believe there is going to be mass carnage, people are going to be injured, and this is what we've been watching in our news feeds, in our social media feeds as this vaccine has been rolled out across the nation and the world." We begin hearing about injuries and deaths. 18 Jan 2021: Norwegian Institute of Public Health cautions against vaccinating old people with serious underlying conditions, as 29 people die shortly after getting the Pfizer shot. 6 May 2021: Tucker Carlson reports, "Between late December of 2020 and last month, a total of 3,362 people apparently died after getting the covid vaccine in the United States." 9 May 2021: Here in New Zealand, @PetousisH on @1NewsNZ, says "There's nothing to suggest there's anything of concern here", following the deaths of two elderly people** shortly after the Pfizer shot. **Keep in mind what happened in Norway, see 18 Jan 2021 in this timeline. 15 May 2021: Del Bigtree again, on the increase in vaccine injuries and deaths being reported. Note: at this point, the Pfizer shot had yet to be rolled out to the wider public here in New Zealand. 23 Sep 2023: Lynda Wharton @HopeRising19 explains how by the end of November 2022, Medsafe (New Zealand's medicines regulator) had discontinued regular pharmacovigilance reports. At that time, these were the numbers: * 65,000 Adverse Event Reports. * 3,688 Serious Adverse Event Reports. * Nearly 6,000 Adverse Event Reports for 5-19 year olds. * 184 families reported the death of a loved one following the injection. * 974 Kiwis had myocarditis/pericarditis following the injection. @nzfirst @winstonpeters @TanyaUnkovichMP @actparty @dbseymour @ChrisPenknz @JudithCollinsMP @NZNationalParty @chrisluxonmp @P_McCulloughMD @stkirsch #NZCovidInquiry2

Video Transcript AI Summary
Dr. Sukhrit Bakadi, a retired microbiologist and co-author of the book "Corona False Alarm Facts and Figures," expresses concerns about the COVID vaccine, calling it dangerous and a massive experiment on humanity. Various individuals share their experiences and concerns about adverse reactions and deaths following vaccination. They question the safety and efficacy of the vaccines, citing instances of blood clots, seizures, paralysis, and even deaths. They highlight the high number of adverse event reports compared to previous vaccines and the lack of transparency in reporting. The video raises doubts about the necessity and safety of the COVID vaccine.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The controversial co author of this book, Corona False Alarm Facts and Figures joins us now. Award winning researcher, retired microbiologist, doctor Sukhrit Bakadi. Doctor, thank you for getting up early for all of us for all these policies, lockdown, social distancing. Which in your view has been the most injurious to the public and not suited to the science? Speaker 1: The looming vaccination. Speaker 0: Well, so you believe that the COVID vaccine is not necessary? Speaker 1: I think it's downright dangerous. And I warn you, if you go along these lines, you are going to go to your doom. What what what is happening is that the world is being turned into an animal experiment. House. It's not even a house. It's our world. And you and our children are being the animals that are being tested. The hugest experiment ever been done in the history of medicine is being performed on men, on people. This is the thing that is so scandalous, so scandalous and so horrifying that any politicians want to go for this, that any authorities, any medical people will will will will say this is the right way to go is such a frightening, horrifying thought to me as a doctor. Speaker 2: I don't trust CNN. I don't trust m m s MSNBC or Fox or anybody that would promote a product that is still in an experimental use phase. Saying things like pregnant women should take it. Well, no, we didn't test on them, but they should take it. I said, and I've said in multiple talks, I believe there is going to be mass carnage. I believe people will be injured. Everything we saw in these trials showed us injuries were taking place. I don't care that Pfizer and Moderna or AstraZeneca explain away and say, well, those weren't caused by the vaccine. That is a hope and a dream. That is not science. And clearly, once this rolled out, I'm in one of those moments where it's sort of a thankless, I told you so, because this is what we have been watching in our news feed, in our social media feeds as this vaccine has rolled out across the nation and the world. Here is just a few of the problems that are glaringly obvious. Speaker 3: In every corner of the country, Americans have been rolling up their sleeves today. Speaker 4: Finally, there is light at the end of the tunnel. Speaker 5: Britain's medicine regulator has advised that people with a history of significant allergies do not get Pfizer BioNTech's COVID 19 vaccine. This warning came after 2 national health service workers reported severe adverse reactions on the 1st day of vaccine rollout. Speaker 6: A health care worker had an anaphylactic reaction during the 15 minute observation a severe allergic reaction, from a health care worker in Alaska after receiving the Pfizer BioNTech vaccine. Now, they report that this person is in stable condition, but the person had been hospitalized after, this allergic event. We're talking about the doctor who, is now the first known case of, an allergic reaction involving the Cambridge based company Moderna's new vaccine that he was taken to the emergency department after his first dose. Speaker 7: I really would like to, Moderna and also Pfizer to, investigate this more to prevent things from happening. Speaker 6: A second vaccine recipient in Alaska had a less serious allergic reaction. Eye puffiness, light headedness, and scratchy throat. He was treated with epinephrine, Benadryl, and Pepcid. Speaker 8: 317 patients out of 32,000 reported fever and headaches. Speaker 9: Mexican authorities over the weekend said they are studying the case of a 30 2 year old female doctor who was hospitalized after receiving the Pfizer BioNTech COVID 19 vaccine. The health ministry said in a statement released Friday night that the initial diagnosis is encephalomyelitis, an inflammation of the brain and spinal cord. Speaker 0: Miami Gregory Michael died following a suspected catastrophic reaction to the Pfizer COVID 19 vaccine. Speaker 3: A nurse is vaccinated. Just minutes later, this happened. Speaker 10: I'm sorry. It's okay. What? Speaker 3: Tiffany Dover fainted as she spoke to reporters at a hospital in Chattanooga, Tennessee. Speaker 8: She had the COVID 19 vaccine. I don't know what happened. I just want answers. I wanna know what led to my daughter's death. Speaker 9: Seizures, breathing difficulty, and a skin rash. Speaker 8: After being released from an urgent care facility, fainted in his home. Speaker 11: We have to assess whether the vaccine is the cause of death or if it is a coincidence that it happens soon after vaccination. Speaker 4: These are the kind of things that happen when you implement large vaccine programs. Speaker 12: And in a concerning development from Norway, the Norwegian Institute of Public Health has cautioned against vaccinating all people with serious underlying conditions against COVID 19. According to a report published by Bloomberg, 29 people have died days after receiving the Pfizer vaccine. Now this is one of the most alarming statements yet from a European health authority. Out of 29 deaths, 13 have undergone an autopsy and according to the Norwegian Medicines Agency, the results suggest suggest that common side effects may have contributed to severe reactions among the elderly. The elderly here refers to people above the age of 75. Speaker 13: Between late December of 2020 last month, a total of 3,362 people apparently died after getting the COVID vaccine in the United States. 3,362. That's an average of roughly 30 people every day. In just the 1st 4 months of this year, the US government has recorded more deaths after COVID vaccinations than from all other vaccines administered in the United States between mid 1997 and the end of 2013. That is a period of 15 and a half years. Again, more people, according to theirs, have died after getting the shot in 4 months during a single vaccination campaign than from all other vaccines combined over more than a decade and a half. Chart that out. It's a stunning picture. Speaker 14: An Auckland University vaccinologist, Helen Petousas Harris, is with me. Helen, thanks for coming in. I imagine this could make some people feel quite nervous. Do we need to worry? Not Speaker 15: at no. Not at all. We want to see events reported, enabled enables us to pick up things that are unexpected or of concern. And at the moment, there's nothing to suggest there's anything of concern here. Speaker 2: I think the people that have made the choice to get the vaccine, many of them probably really regret it, especially these people. Speaker 6: More than a 150,000,000 Americans have received at least one dose. Speaker 13: 58% of adult Americans with at least one shot. And a 110,000,000 Americans fully vaccinated. Speaker 16: On our way to hitting our goal of 200,000,000 shots by the 100th day in office. Speaker 17: But a Virginia woman says she believes her mother died as a result of the vaccine. Speaker 3: The woman passed away several days after getting her second Moderna vaccine. The death of an Ionia County wife and mother. Speaker 18: They found her dead in her room. Speaker 19: I was in full body convulsions. Speaker 20: Blood clots. Speaker 17: Flash pulmonary edema caused by anaphylaxis. Speaker 11: Abnormal clotting or pulmonary emboli. Speaker 8: Every bone and muscle in my body was shaking. Speaker 21: Her platelet levels had fallen. Speaker 11: She died. He died. Speaker 21: Fell into a coma. Died Wednesday. Speaker 22: 2 weeks after getting a first dose of a Pfizer COVID 19 vaccine, a 56 year old doctor in South Florida died this week. It's possibly the nation's first death linked to the vaccine. Speaker 18: This Orange County son worries his mom died because of her second Moderna COVID 19 vaccine dose. The day after her second shot on April 14th at a CVS in Orange, Griselda complained of the expected side effects, chills, body aches, and a fever. Speaker 7: She looked really pale, though. Really pale. Pale. And she just said she was tired, and she's gonna go home and sleep. Speaker 18: 2 days after her second dose, Griselda's family says they found her dead in her room. A handful of deaths, including Griselda's, are under investigation because they happened 1 to 3 days after the person got a COVID 19 vaccine dose. Speaker 21: The Facebook picture that captured Augusta Turiaco's delight at getting a COVID vaccine. The 55 year old Italian posting done on March 11th. Despite developing a headache and feeling unwell afterwards, she returned to her work as a music teacher. Her condition worsened. She fell into a coma and died 19 days after having the AstraZeneca injection. Medical records seen by Sky News show blood clots had formed in Augusta Turiaco's body, including in her brain. Her platelet levels had fallen. Speaker 17: Her 58 year old mother died less than an hour after receiving the Pfizer vaccine. Her mother had flash pulmonary edema caused by anaphylaxis. The medical examiner told Jones they would not be performing a full autopsy. Speaker 23: And that ripped my heart out all over again because I when something like this happens unexpectedly, you want answers. Speaker 11: Hamilton County coroner Lakshmi Samarco is investigating why the seemingly healthy college junior died suddenly. Samarco says Foley received the j and j COVID 19 vaccine Saturday afternoon, the day before he died. Speaker 24: The wife, mom, and animal rescued developed a persistent headache a week after receiving the Johnson and Johnson vaccine. She died April 19th from an acute subarachnoid hemorrhage, essentially a brain bleed. Speaker 25: Evans' obituary says she died Wednesday from a reaction to the COVID vaccine. In a statement, the Kansas State Health Department says a 60 8 year old started experiencing anaphylaxis. Speaker 26: Little is known about the person who died in Placer County, their age, gender, what vaccine they received, and if they had any underlying health conditions. But the Placer County Sheriff's Office says the person tested positive for COVID 19 in late December and was vaccinated January 21st and died several hours later. Speaker 20: Within a couple hours, he just couldn't breathe on his own. He had stomach problems. He was complaining that, he wasn't feeling good. Speaker 27: That's the message tonight from Kyle Zook. His dad died 4 days after getting his second shot of Pfizer vaccine. Speaker 20: And by the time he clocked out, he couldn't breathe at all. Speaker 27: That was January 5th. Within hours, Tim Zook was admitted into the ER of the same hospital he was working at. 2 days later Speaker 20: He was so bad, he voluntarily told them, put me on the ventilator. I wanna live. Those were his last words. Speaker 6: The sudden death of a former Detroit anchor and media executive brought loved ones and colleagues together today. Speaker 28: The Detroit media icon was found dead at her home last Tuesday by her husband just one day after taking the COVID 19 vaccine. Speaker 6: And in Orange County, an X-ray technician has died after getting his second dose of the Pfizer vaccine. According to the OC register, 60 year old Tim Cook had an adverse reaction within just hours of getting that second shot, and he died within a matter of days. Speaker 4: On Thursday, we learned of an Oregon woman in her fifties who developed a serious blood clot in combination with very low platelets and died. Speaker 29: An Auburn woman posting a warning tonight. She saw her grandfather get the COVID vaccine at a senior living facility Thursday. She writes, 20 minutes later, he realized his legs felt tingly and he was having shortness of breath. He was wheeled out in an ambulance. 1 hour later, he was in ICU on a ventilator, and 3 hours later, he passed away. Speaker 30: Brandy Parker McFadden sits in her Vanderbilt hospital bed unable to stand. Speaker 31: You know, our youngest is like, are you ever gonna walk again? And so, you know, we just reassure him this is extremely rare. Speaker 30: The mother of 3 received her second Pfizer COVID shot April 16th. Hours later, an unusual sensation started in her legs. Speaker 16: That's what created the sense of urgency. Speaker 30: James rushed Brandy to the emergency room at Vanderbilt Speaker 32: to end then the unimaginable. I woke up and I was like, I can't move my arms. I can't move my legs. Speaker 31: And so he's freaking out. The doctors are panicking. Speaker 16: I'm holding her hand, and her hand is limp throughout the whole thing while she's screaming in pain. And, you know, and the test results are all coming back negative. Speaker 30: 10 days later, Brandy is able to move her arms and wiggle her toes. She will now undergo intensive physical therapy, hoping to walk again. Speaker 31: I'm gonna fight. I'm I'm a fighter. Speaker 19: On January 4th, was very pressured by my employer to get the vaccine. My tongue was spazzing. The next day, I was in full body convulsions and stayed that way for 13 days. Speaker 33: I took the vaccine on January 19th. I've had 6 ER visits. There was one day where I had 16 back to back convulsions. It's been a long road from there. When the convulsion started, I knew it had to be from the vaccine. And I got up and I could not use either of my legs, followed by full body convulsions about 2 hours later. My husband took me to the ER, and from there I was transported over to the hospital. I was at Ochsner Hospital for 5 days, and I never got any treatment for convulsions. Speaker 8: That is my daughter work at the Sands Place in Hopington, and she have a heart problem. She go doctor and they give her the COVID injection, and that's how we leave her. Speaker 16: Yeah. That's why I'm not taking that shit. Speaker 7: Oh my god, man. Speaker 10: That's crazy. Speaker 7: Wow. What did you pass about? Omega. Speaker 8: 17 year old Everest Romney got his vaccine shot. A few days later, Everest couldn't even move his neck. And then the migraine started. His mother finally got him a CT scan. Then she got another one ordered on his head. That is when doctors found out he had 2 blood clots inside his brain, another on the outside of his brain. Speaker 34: The hardest thing was I let him get that shot. And he was healthy and well before. And I was doing my best and I I thought it was the right thing to do. And I don't wanna discourage any parents from not doing that. You know? I but you you quest you can't you can't help but question it when it all goes wrong. Speaker 35: Sorry about my appearance, but long story short, I got the Johnson and Johnson vaccine yesterday. Nobody knows if if this is the reason that all this stuff is going on, but started with chest pain, paralysis on my left side. I was rushed over via ambulance to Baylor Dallas, where I have had numerous scans done. I have had about 8 seizures in the last 2 days. Never had a seizure before. They did find a 3 millimeter brain aneurysm. I am currently hooked up to my EEG so they can monitor my seizures. Thank you everyone for all the prayers, and you will bring the financials soon. Speaker 10: I am currently in the ICU. About 2 weeks ago, I had the b a c c I n e. I'm currently in school to become a dental assistant. And on Thursday, I was driving home from school. My right arm fell off my skin. And until I was able to get to the ER. And as I arrived, I realized I couldn't have the right side of my body at all. The emergency room I was in believed that I had suffered a stroke. They had run some tests and realized that I need more medical attention than they could offer. I was then transported by ambulance to the ICU where I began my journey of fighting for my life. I had been going through a lot of tests, and a lot of stuff was happening, and doctors didn't have answers As to why I was suffering temporary paralysis, I ended up 5 nights on 3 different occasions. In a 24 hour period, I couldn't remember my friends. My family, myself, although I still cannot move this red leg. I have a walker now. My foot drags when I walk. Tomorrow, I get transferred over the rehab center. I have to learn to walk again. I am a young, pretty healthy, and active female of my early twenties just this past weekend. I just went fishing, camping up north, enjoying time with my friends, scouting for elk season and dew season. I'm a huge outdoor advocate. But due to this sad scene, I don't even know if I'll gain full movement in the leg back. Speaker 36: All I know is that prior to my vaccine, I was healthy. I was cool. And then after my vaccine, I had complete paralysis of my body. I've regained the upper body strength, and I'm working towards both toes moving on left and right. Speaker 6: On March 6th, Terrell received the Johnson and Johnson vaccine in Ashland. But 4 days later Speaker 16: I began to feel a little discomfort in my armpit, and then I began, a few days later, began to get an itchy rash. And then after that, I began to swell, and my skin turned red. Speaker 6: This red rash quickly spreading, covering Terrell's entire body. His legs and hands almost unrecognizable from swelling and discoloration. It's been getting worse and worse since Friday. Every morning, it's a little bit more worse. It's covering my entire body. Speaker 10: It's also in the palm of my hands. I am a COVID nurse Speaker 37: or have been for the past 3 months. I ended up taking the vaccine 3 weeks ago. So which now I've developed Bell's Palsy, right sided facial paralysis. Speaker 10: I've been through hell and back ever since I took that shot. Speaker 13: Go get vaccinated Speaker 11: now. Now. Speaker 38: By the end of November 2022, MedSafe discontinued regular pharmacovigilance reports. So that's nearly a year ago. Showing the number of New Zealanders who had reported adverse events following COVID injections. MedSafe themselves acknowledge that typical reporting captures no more than 5% of the actual number of adverse events. This is a passive voluntary reporting system and many New Zealanders including many doctors do not even know that it exists. By November 2022, MedSafe had received 65,000 adverse event reports. By MedSafe's own standards, if these reports represent only 5% of the actual number of adverse events, They suggest that 1,300,000 New Zealanders experienced an adverse event following a COVID injection. By November 2022, there were 3,688 reports deemed serious, meaning a medically important event that requires hospitalization, causes persistent or significant disability or is life threatening or results in death. Nearly 6,000 adverse event reports were lodged for young people aged 5 to 19 years. 184 families reported the death of a loved one following their COVID injection. 974 New Zealanders had new onset myocarditis or pericarditis after their injection. Contrary to the Ministry of Health Assurance that these conditions are mild and self limiting, many of these people remain severely unwell 2 years on. Prior to the rollout of the COVID injections, an average cumulative total of adverse events for adverse event reports for all doses of every vaccine administered in a typical year in New Zealand was 1500 adverse event reports. That's every childhood vaccine, every travel vaccine, flu vaccine, shingles vaccine combined resulting in approximately 1500 reports a year. Compare that to the 64,000 to the end of November last year for COVID injections. How many deaths are reported following vaccination in a typical year? 1 or less. Compare that with 184 reports in the 1st 21 months of COVID injections, 184 reported deaths. An official information application in April 2023 revealed that by March 2023 MedSafe held 11,289 reports deemed medically significant or serious. 1062 reports were listed as disabled, 118 were deemed life threatening, 184 were deaths.
Saved - August 19, 2024 at 11:26 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I had a conversation with a cancer patient who believes their illness and heart attack were caused by the vaccine. They expressed anger over their situation, especially not being able to see their child's first birthday, and mentioned the rapid progression to stage four cancer. I acknowledged the growing frustration among people who feel misled about vaccine safety. They shared that while one doctor acknowledged a possible link to the vaccine, another dismissed the idea. I offered my condolences and prayers for their family, hoping for justice in the future.

@harryfisherEMTP - Harry Fisher

Real paramedic experience: Cancer Patient- I really think it’s the vaccine that caused my cancer. I had a heart attack not long after I got the shot too. Paramedic/me- they originally said covid shots were completely safe and effective at stopping the spread. Then we found out they aren’t actually safe as advertised and they don’t stop the spread. So many lies told to the public at this point. I have seen a lot of young people like yourself develop rapid cancer since taking them as well. I’m very sorry. Cancer Patient- we just had a baby. Knowing I won’t be able to see first birthday. I’m angry. I don’t know why this is allowed to happen to us. Paramedic/me- what stage do the doctors say you’re in? Cancer Patient- four. It’s like I went from just fine one day to stage four the next. The people that told us this was safe deserve the death penalty, or prison for life at the least. Paramedic/me- I hope justice is served to anyone that knowingly harms others. Do your doctors attribute the vaccine as the cause? Cancer Patient- one doctor said yes “he thinks so,” and that “they’re seeing many younger people in their office lately.” The other I talked to wouldn’t even listen to me when I suggested the vaccine as a possibility. Paramedic/me- I know saying I’m sorry doesn’t quite cut it, but I am. I’m glad you found one honest doctor. I’ll keep you in my prayers. You and your new family. Cancer Patient- thank you. ____________________ People are starting to get mad. They’ve gone from denial, sadness, to anger. They openly want retribution. I don’t know if we will see it in our lifetime, but I’m praying we do. Before more are harmed, and many are no longer here with us to see their murderers brought to justice. God bless

@harryfisherEMTP - Harry Fisher

I don’t know if you got to see the first birthday, but I pray you did.

Saved - August 31, 2024 at 1:45 PM

@iluminatibot - illuminatibot

Cocky Pharmacist admits that he knew the jab was for depopulation and was coerced into giving it to people. He doesn't seem to be phased one bit by killing and disabling people because of his job. His excuse was, that he was "forced" to do it. https://t.co/ZwPYwPL0PF

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 asks Speaker 1 if they personally administered any COVID-19 vaccinations and informs them they may be personally liable and prosecuted under the Nuremberg Code. Speaker 0 claims COVID was a hoax and the shots are for depopulation, having killed or permanently disabled millions. Speaker 1 states the company is liable, not them, because they made sure beforehand that the company would take responsibility and support them administering the shots.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Did you personally administer any COVID 19 vaccinations? Speaker 1: I'm sorry? Speaker 0: Did you personally, administer any COVID 19 vaccinations? Do you know that you may be, personally liable and, prosecuted under the Nuremberg Code? Speaker 1: Yeah. No. It's a it's a thing here, and I I've gone through, and I have I I know what you're doing here, and I'm with you. Speaker 0: You may have some debts on your hands. Speaker 1: Yeah. I I Speaker 0: How many did you administer? Speaker 1: Oh, I don't know. Speaker 0: Yeah. Rough estimate. Speaker 1: Oh, no. Speaker 0: Okay. Because, you know, it's it's recently come out. You know, the the COVID was a hoax and the the the shots are for depopulation. So, you know, you know, it's, it's really bad what happened. Speaker 1: You know? Yeah. Speaker 0: A lot a lot of people fell for it. Speaker 1: No. And, you Speaker 0: know, it's killed millions of people. Let's say permanently disabled, you know, countless millions. So Speaker 1: Yeah. Worldwide. So And that's why the only reason why I did it is because my company is liable for that, not for me because I was fortunate to administer. I'm with him. So that's why I made sure it was beforehand. I told him that, I was gonna take responsibility for it. Told them that wanted me to administer it. They were on the support, me. Okay. Because they told me I was gonna go fly back and stuff. Okay. I got you covered. Thanks, Cheers. Speaker 0: Thank you. Very interesting revelations there. Very interesting. You heard that.
Saved - October 8, 2024 at 12:42 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I had a conversation with a doctor about the implications of COVID vaccines. I questioned when people would realize the potential harm, and the doctor suggested most wouldn't want to know. We discussed the rising number of sudden deaths and the lack of answers for grieving families. The doctor expressed concern that, like with cigarettes, accountability might never come. He acknowledged he might also be a victim. I felt a chilling silence as we contemplated a future where the death toll could be catastrophic, urging those in EMS to prepare for unprecedented challenges.

@harryfisherEMTP - Harry Fisher

Real paramedic conversation with Doctor: Paramedic/me- at what point do you think people will finally realize they’ve been poisoned by these covid vaccines? Doctor- most won’t ever know. Most don’t want to know. Paramedic/me- people are dying suddenly all the time now. What do you tell the families? Doctor- there’s not much of a point to tell them now. What’s done is done. Besides, most people aren’t getting them anymore anyway. So I think most have a clue… Paramedic/me- so the powers that be are just going to get away with murder? Doctor- there’s going to be a day when there’s so much death that people will Demand answers. However, like cigarettes, and the amount of death they cause, not much will happen. Paramedic/me- what will you say then? When the death counts get so far out of hand. Doctor- I took the vaccine too. I’ll probably be one of the people that die suddenly as well. It’ll be up to the few of you left that didn’t take it to speak up for us. Paramedic/me- but won’t the government be apart of those that die suddenly too? Who’s going to listen to us at that point? Doctor- Harry, you’d be amazed at how many in our government faked getting the vaccine. By that time it happens, it will honestly be smart for you to keep your mouth shut and retire somewhere. Just take your family and get out of the way. Paramedic/me- silence __________________ There will be a day that the death toll is so overwhelming. So bad. It will look like a horror movie. The death is already immense, but if he’s right it’s going to overwhelm our system. For those working in ems. Prepare yourselves for the busiest disaster of your lives. God bless

Saved - November 10, 2024 at 3:48 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
As a paramedic involved with COVID vaccines, I've witnessed their deadly effects firsthand. I've spoken to the injured and performed CPR on victims. I urge everyone to avoid these vaccines, as they pose significant risks without proven benefits, including transmission prevention and safety for pregnancy.

@harryfisherEMTP - Harry Fisher

I’m a paramedic that works directly with covid vaccines. I have seen them kill people. I have talked to the injured and done CPR on the victims. Do not under any circumstance take them. They are dangerous. They do not stop transmission of COVID, they haven’t been tested for cancer link or their effects on pregnancy. These deadly vaccines are all risk and zero reward. Harry Fisher Paramedic

Saved - November 18, 2024 at 8:25 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I had a conversation with a patient recently diagnosed with stage four cancer just six weeks ago. They mentioned feeling weak and receiving a blood transfusion about ten weeks prior, during which they suspect they might have received vaccinated blood. The patient expressed concerns about the Covid vaccines and their potential link to "turbo cancers." It was a sad exchange, and I’m uncertain of their current condition, but I continue to pray for them. I believe there’s a need for unvaccinated blood options. God bless.

@harryfisherEMTP - Harry Fisher

Real paramedic experience: Paramedic/me- when were you first diagnosed with cancer? Patient- about 6 weeks ago. They say it’s already stage four. Paramedic/me- I’m so sorry. Did you take any of those Covid vaccines? Patient- no. I’ve heard of the turbo cancers that those shots can cause. Paramedic/me- it sounds like you are experiencing that now though. What do the doctors say? Patient- I was low on hemoglobin about 10 weeks ago, was feeling weak and they gave me a blood transfusion at the hospital. The cancer wasn’t present then. I’m betting I received vaccinated blood. Was diagnosed with stage four cancer just a few weeks after that. __________________ Was a sad conversation. Not sure if they are still alive to this day, but I’m still praying for them. Very awake person. We need unvaccinated blood options. God bless

Saved - December 5, 2024 at 6:18 PM

@harryfisherEMTP - Harry Fisher

Public data provided by Steve Kirsch. I’m a paramedic that’s done the CPR after people have taken the COVID vaccine. At this point in time those who are murdering us are getting pardons while the rest of us suffer. God bless https://t.co/hbyToQBRR8

Video Transcript AI Summary
You want me to elevate your head? This is what we had to do when the vaccines rolled out, and there's a lot of death being covered up. The COVID case fatality rate is calculated as deaths divided by cases. It should decrease with an effective vaccine, but in Santa Clara County, California, and nationwide, it actually increased by 2.6. This means your risk of dying from COVID went up. Our public health department refuses to comment.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You want me to elevate your head? This is what we were having to do to people whenever the vaccines rolled out. This is what they're trying to cover up. A whole lot of death. And here's some data provided by Steve Dersh. God bless. Speaker 1: The COVID case fatality rate is defined as deaths divided by cases. Now it's supposed to go down after you roll out an effective vaccine, but it went up by 2.6 in Santa Clara County. It went up in California and it went up nationwide. It went the wrong way. It increased your risk of dying from COVID. Our public health department refuses to comment.
Saved - January 1, 2025 at 10:59 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
In this extensive thread, I share alarming evidence and personal testimonies linking COVID injections to a rise in aggressive cancers, termed "turbo cancers." Experts, including oncologists and pathologists, describe how these vaccines may suppress the immune system, leading to rapid cancer progression. Anecdotal accounts from individuals reveal a troubling pattern of aggressive cancers developing shortly after vaccination. Scientific studies and VAERS data suggest significant increases in cancer rates post-vaccination, raising serious concerns about the long-term effects of these injections.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

THE COVID INJECTIONS CAUSE AGGRESSIVE (TURBO) CANCERS EN MASSE: A MEGA-THREAD SHOWCASING THE OVERWHELMING EVIDENCE OF AN UNTHINKABLE HORROR THAT WILL TOUCH US ALL (1/57+)🧵 (Stick this thread on any post with a Community Note saying the injections don’t cause turbo cancers.) Thread index: Tweets 1–16: Physicians, Scientists, and Industry Experts—from the U.S., U.K., Canada, Germany, and Sweden—Describe How the COVID Injections Cause Turbo Cancers The injections— -Severely degrade the immune system, particularly causing T-cell suppression -Are adulterated with DNA plasmids, which contain the notorious SV40 promoter sequence, which has not only been associated with oncogenesis, but also binding with P53 a.k.a. “the guardian of the genome” -Are associated with far more aggressive cancers than what was normal prior to the injections’ rollout -Are associated with increasing rates of cancers Tweets 17–23: Anecdotal interviews with people describing aggressive cancers in themselves, their friends, or family members who’ve taken one or more COVID injections. Tweets 24–39: Evidence in the scientific literature and regulatory documentation that supports the idea that the COVID injections degrade the immune system, are capable of causing aggressive cancers, and contain DNA and SV40 contamination. Tweets 40–47: A—small—sample of the VAERS reports linking the COVID injections to various types of cancers. Tweets 48–57: Users on X speak out about themselves, family, or friends who developed an aggressive, often fatal, cancer following receipt of one or more COVID injections. NOTE: Please add your own COVID injection–related “turbo cancer” story to this thread to bolster the already overwhelming evidence that it is indeed a real phenomenon. —----------------------- DR. DAVID RASNICK—“I’m convinced that the true explanation of what’s behind turbo cancer is that these [COVID] injections…are devastating the immune system…[and] now we’re seeing a consequence of that devastated immune system.” In this first tweet, we start by hearing from cancer and AIDS research titan Dr. David Rasnick, who notes in a 2024 interview with Children’s Health Defense that this phenomenon of “turbo cancers” is new, and is defined by cancers that appear and grow to Stage 3 or Stage 4—i.e. “lethal”—in a matter of months. Rasnick, who earned a PhD in chemistry from the Georgia Institute of Technology in 1978, has more than 20 years of experience in the pharmaceutical and biotech industries, published numerous scientific papers, and invented novel laboratory techniques, notes that these turbo cancers are also affecting younger people than usual, including people in their 20s. “When it [the turbo cancer] develops, they get late stage cancer and they’re dead really, really quickly,” Rasnick says. “That is new.” Furthermore, Rasnick says the only other time these kinds of rapid-growing cancers have been observed was in lab animals that were made to be immune deficient “by design.” “I’m convinced that the true explanation of what’s behind turbo cancer,” Rasnick says, “is that these [COVID] injections…these mRNA and DNA genetic injections…are devastating the immune system…[and] now we’re seeing a consequence of that devastated immune system.” Rasnick adds, “Once your immune system is really, really depressed, now these things [cancers] can develop rapidly.” The cancer researcher adds, “We’re basically doing to human beings what we did to laboratory animals: We’re destroying their immune systems to the point where they can’t resist the cancer. And the cancers are now growing like they are in cell culture. They don’t have anything impeding their ability to proliferate.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
Turbo cancer refers to a concerning trend where cancer progresses from initial stages to advanced stages in a matter of months, particularly in young individuals. This rapid development is linked to a compromised immune system, likely due to mRNA and DNA vaccines, which are described as genetic injections rather than traditional vaccines. These injections appear to weaken the immune response, allowing tumors that may have been benign or dormant to grow unchecked. This phenomenon mirrors previous observations in immune-deficient animals, suggesting that the same detrimental effects are now occurring in humans. Essentially, the immune system's inability to combat cancer cells leads to accelerated tumor growth, akin to conditions observed in laboratory settings.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The turbo cancer thing, which is new, is that instead of taking decades for the cancer to develop all the way from nowhere to stage 3 and stage 4, which which release the cancers, we we're seeing this happen now in the order of months. And in young people like in their twenties, and and they get really when it develops, they get late stage cancer and they're dead really really quickly. That is new. The only time we have ever seen this rapid or so called turbo, that's what they call it now, we just call it accelerated cancer in the animals or things because they were immune deficient by by design. Now what we're doing, I think the simplest, best explanation and I'm convinced the true explanation of what's behind turbo cancer is is that these injections, these, nucleoside, I mean, these mRNA and DNA vaccines, these genetic injections, they're not vaccines, these genetic injections are devastating the immune system. We we we know that's happening already but now we're seeing a consequence of that devastated immune system. That's an acceleration of tumors that were probably already in you to begin with where benign probably go away on their own. You'd never know you've had it. And but once your immune system is really really depressed, now these things can develop rapidly. And we can we know that in animals, we've caused it in animals, you know, for decades. I personally didn't. I didn't work with those cool things. I was just a regular laboratory as a chemist. But, so now we're doing it in people. We're basically doing to human beings what we did to laboratory animals. We're destroying their immune systems to the point where, they they can't resist the cancer, and the cancer cells are now growing like they are in cell culture. They don't have anything impeding impeding their their, their ability to proliferate. And, that that in a nutshell is what turbocancer is.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(2/57) DR. RYAN COLE — “[These shots]...cause immune suppression. They cause a disruption and dysregulation of your immune system that normally is what would fight cancer.” In this clip from a 2023 interview with Greg Hunter, Dr. Ryan Cole, a board-certified pathologist and founder of Cole Diagnostics Inc. in Boise, Idaho, says that he saw early warning signs of immune system suppression following the rollout of the COVID injections and warned people that they “suppress the immune system.” Cole notes that the injections “alter the way your immune system works.” He adds that they “[put] your T cells to sleep” in such a way that they can’t perform their “surveillance” duties “to fight cancer.” The veteran pathologist adds that he has traveled the world, talking to oncologists, pathologists, family doctors, et al., who say that they’re “seeing cancers…in age groups…never seen before, and it happened after the rollout of the shots.” Cole adds that insurance datasets and some countries’ disability data confirms the huge uptick in cancers. In the U.K., for example, Cole says that in 2021, there was a 6–7% rise in cancers; in 2022, there was a staggering 35% increase. “Those are the types of data that we’re seeing that [are] really concerning,” Cole adds.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Many people have received COVID shots for various reasons. However, there are concerning trends regarding autoimmune diseases, heart inflammation in young people, and rising cancer rates. The lipid nanoparticle mRNA technology used in these vaccines has not been proven safe long-term. These shots may suppress the immune system, particularly T cells, which are crucial for fighting infections and cancer. This immune suppression has led to what some are calling "turbo cancers," characterized by aggressive and unusual tumor behavior. Reports from pathologists indicate an increase in aggressive cancers in younger populations since the vaccine rollout, with significant rises in cancer rates noted in disability datasets. The data is alarming and suggests a need for caution regarding these vaccines.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So many people got these shots, you know, for whatever reason I'm not here to judge. If you got 1, don't get 2. If you get 2, don't get 3. If you got 3, don't get 4. If you never got 1, please don't get 1. And here's why: because the amount of autoimmune disease we're seeing, the amount of inflammation in the hearts of healthy young people that we're seeing, the amount of neurologic damage and harm, Parkinson's, exacerbation, worsening of of dementia and Alzheimer's disease, and, you know, to bring the monster in the room, cancer, is on the uptick. And, and it's not me just saying, oh, well, you know, my job as a pathologist is to observe patterns, and if I see something, I say something. And what do you hear in the airports when you travel? If you see something, say something. Well, I did, and I still am. It's not just that these COVID shots are bad, it's anything with the lipid nanoparticle mRNA technology shot is not proven to be long term safe. So it's this whole platform that we have. So we're we're in trouble. We're seeing steady rises in all these chronic diseases that I mentioned, and you mentioned Greg, and unfortunately the cancer, statistics, I saw an early warning sign when these shots rolled out. I was the first one in the world to go public with it and said, hey, yeah, I did. And Really? I yeah. And at that point, I knew. I said, look, we have immune dysregulation. You want a healthy immune system. These shots suppress the immune system. Doctor Fossa out of the Netherlands, when he looked at the Pfizer vaccines and studies, showed that it was altering the way your immune system works. That's not good. It puts your t cells to sleep in a manner that they can't fight, and t cells are basically the marines of your immune system. They're in the frontline warriors, and all day long, you know, you and I sitting here right now, anybody listening, we have about 30,000,000,000 T cells circulating around in our body, and they're shaking hands and talking to yourselves, Hey, are you a friend? Are you a a foe? Are you infected? Are you a cancer cell? You know, what do we do with you? And so it's just knocking on the door, checking all the time with all your cells. Well, these shots, instead of having those be hearty, on the front line, healthy soldiers, it makes them kind of drunk and go back to the barracks and go to sleep. And now they can't do that surveillance, on the, you know, exactly to fight cancer, and so people ask, well, well, you know, do these shots cause cancer? Well, they cause immune suppression. They cause a disruption and a dysregulation of your immune system that normally is what would fight cancer. So that's what we're up against. And so, yeah, I shouted the warning early on, I was attacked for doing so, and here we are, all the data points that we can get are going upward. And there are a lot of data points Hold Speaker 1: on just a minute, I just want to, before Speaker 0: we get in. Yeah. Anytime. I'll write it. Speaker 1: When you say it doesn't cause cancer, you are one of the people that have used this turbo cancer. So we're getting turbo cancers because there's nothing there to fight it. Speaker 0: Well, yeah. Because those T cells have gone to sleep to a degree that they would normally fight off cancer, and now they're not there to fight off that cancer. And so the the term turbo cancer, a good friend in Sweden, pathologist, Doctor Ute Kruger, she was the one seeing, after the rollout of the shots, a really big uptick in breast cancers in her pathology practice. And these tumors were more aggressive, were larger than she was used to seeing, and were behaving in a manner that she hadn't seen before, so she called them turbocancers. And then that term got popularized and kind of spread around the world. And as I travel the world, talk to physicians, oncologists, pathologists, family docs, internists, OBGYNs, you name it, and they come to me at these meetings and say, I'm seeing cancers in my practice in age groups I've never seen before and it happened after the rollout of the shots. And the datasets are available in insurance datasets and in some countries we can get into the disability datasets like the United Kingdom, Ed Dowd and his group at financetechnologies.com with a PH, they they went in and looked at the disability dataset. In 2020 there was about a 1 point something percent increase in cancer, in 2021, about 6-seven percent, but in 2022, there was a 35% expected above average. So those are the type of data we're seeing that is really concerning.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(3/57) DR. ROGER HODKINSON— “The immune system has been taken off its watch…[there could be] a tsunami of…cancer and other conditions that have been brought on…by this vaccination program.” In this clip from a 2022 interview with the RAIR Foundation, Dr. Roger Hodkinson, a medical specialist in pathology, a graduate of Cambridge University, and a Fellow at the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada (FRCPC), echoes Dr. Ryan Cole’s concerns regarding the COVID injections’ deleterious effects on the immune system. “One of the primary functions of the immune system is to surveil the entire body, looking for little, tiny cancers that can be knocked off before they get to a size when they produce a lump or a syndrome that kills you…[And] with the [COVID] vaccination, having a profound impact on the vitality of our immune system, the deep concern is that some of these cancers that are being reported, or maybe all of them, are due to immune escape,” Hodkinson says. The pathologist adds, “the immune system has been…taken off its watch…and the cancer has been allowed to proliferate in a way that it would not normally have done.” Hodkinson goes on to note: “[This] could result in a tsunami of…cancer and other conditions that have been brought on…by this vaccination program.” He adds, “When…something of this magnitude…is not studied, that is cause for enormous concern. Because that is not the way medicine works.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
Recent reports suggest a significant increase in cancer rates post-vaccination, with anecdotal evidence indicating a potential tripling. The exact incidence remains unclear, but the immune system's role in identifying and eliminating early cancer cells is crucial. Vaccination may temporarily impair immune surveillance, allowing cancers to proliferate unchecked. This raises concerns about a possible surge in cancer cases resulting from the vaccination program. Some healthcare professionals, like Dr. Ryan Cole in Idaho, have noted increased cancer activity, highlighting the lack of thorough studies typically associated with vaccine development. Normally, vaccines undergo extensive research over several years, but this process was expedited in this case, raising alarms about potential complications.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There's been a lot of reports recently about it well, the the number I've been seeing kicked around is a 300% or tripling of cancer rates since the rollout of the injections. Speaker 1: Is that Speaker 0: your understanding? And do would you wanna go into the mechanism of that a little bit? Speaker 1: Yes. The true incidence of, cancer post vaccination is still not clear. What is clear is that there are enough anecdotal reports, globally, to strongly suggest that that is happening. The mechanism by which that would take place is very clear and well known. Because the immune system, does not just fight off infections, which is what most people think of. The job of the immune system is to figure out anything that's not you that's entering your body or is in your body. And of course, bugs are one thing that's not you. But equally, cancer, because of the fact that it's only a cancer because it's mutated. The DNA is different from you. The immune system, one of the prime functions of the immune system, is to constantly surveil the entire body looking for little tiny cancers that can be knocked off before they get to a size when they produce a lump or a syndrome that eventually kills you. And we believe that that process is is going on for our entire lives with meticulous efficiency because it's only when the balance of forces changes for various reasons as we get older that those little cancers don't get knocked off and do escape control. So with the vaccination having a profound impact on the vitality of our immune system, The the deep concern is that some of these cancers that are being reported, or maybe all of them, are due to immune escape. That the immune system has been basically taken off its watch for a period of time. And during that period of time, the cancer has been allowed to proliferate in a way that it would not normally have done. How prevalent that is, it's very unclear right now. Early. Again, we don't know what we don't know. And it could result in it could could result in a tsunami of conditions, cancer and other conditions, that have been brought on specifically and unintentionally by this vaccination program. Speaker 0: My. So that's something to definitely keep an eye for. Anecdotally, apparently, some on call just are reporting considerably more activity Speaker 1: than others. Doctor Ryan Cole, particularly in Idaho, was the first one to blow the whistle, but he's not the only one. It's you you see, when there's something of this magnitude, which is so obvious, when there's something of that magnitude that's not studied, that's cause for enormous concern. Because that's not the way medicine works. Vaccines, for example, vaccines are usually studied with great thoroughness for 5 to 10 years. Ordinary vaccines. Not a new technology, but just ordinary. You know, an attenuated virus, a dead virus. That's what we normally do. This time, that was trashed. Wholesale. Trashed. For something, there's nothing worse than a bad seasonal flu with all these gigantic potential complications.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(4/57) SCIENTIST KEVIN MCKERNAN—”The EMA…has documents that have leaked showing a one to 815-fold variance in the amount of DNA contamination that are in these vaccines.” In this clip from a presentation given to the International COVID Summit in 2024, Kevin McKernan, Founder and Chief Scientific Officer of Medicinal Genomics, as well as former R&D lead of the Human Genome Project, describes how there is “DNA contamination” in the mRNA COVID injections from both Pfizer and Moderna. McKernan notes that there is DNA plasmid contamination of between one and 815-fold from injection lot to injection lot (i.e. batch to batch) and that the contamination has been found by scientists in multiple states in the U.S. and in Germany. (The one to 815-fold figure means that the amount of DNA plasmids present in a given injection is up to 815 times the allowable amount set by regulatory agencies.) McKernan notes that regulators have, in turn, been forced to respond to the contamination and that the FDA in the U.S., the European Medicines Agency (EMA), and Health Canada have all confirmed that there is indeed DNA plasmids in the COVID mRNA injections. McKernan notes that the regulators have also confirmed that this DNA contamination includes the so-called “SV40 promoter,” which is a DNA sequence derived from the Simian Virus 40 that enhances gene expression. I.e. the SV40 promoter helps to import the contaminating DNA plasmids into the nucleus of the cell. Furthermore, McKernan notes that the inclusion of the SV40 in the contaminating DNA plasmids was originally withheld from the regulators by Pfizer. Note that, as outlined in the documentation in tweet 39 in this mega-thread, an FDA guidance document published back in 2010 states the following: “Residual DNA might be a risk to your final product because of oncogenic [i.e. cancer causing] and/or infectivity potential. There are several potential mechanisms by which residual DNA could be oncogenic, including the integration and expression of encoded oncogenes or insertional mutagenesis following DNA integration.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
There is significant evidence of DNA contamination in vaccines, with findings from multiple researchers in Germany, Japan, France, and the U.S. Regulatory bodies like the FDA and EMA acknowledge this contamination but downplay its importance based on Pfizer's reassurances. Initially, clinical trials used clean DNA, but the mass-produced vaccines used unfiltered plasma DNA, increasing contamination. The regulators received a misleading plasmid map, omitting crucial annotations. Claims about expired vials are false, as tests show decay can be measured accurately. Critics argue that the PCR methods used by regulators are inadequate, and Moderna's vaccines are cleaner. The regulators' use of different measurement methods for RNA and DNA raises concerns about transparency and compliance with regulations.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What we do have is reproduction in spades. We now have people in Germany, Japan. We have people in France who have seen this DNA contamination. The EMA even has documents that have leaked showing there is a one to 8 15 fold variance in the amount of DNA contamination there in these vaccines. That was data that was given to them cherry picked by Pfizer. We also have Doctor. Buchholz work in South Carolina that has replicated this qPCR. He's even done Oxford Nanopore sequencing on this. Doctor. Xin Lee has done Sanger sequencing in Connecticut. Doctor. Bridget Koning has done work in Germany. This much reproduction has forced the regulators to respond. We've got responses now from the FDA, from the EMA and from Health Canada that have all acknowledged this contamination is there. Now they disagree that it matters because they turn to their sponsors to get that answer. They've gone to Pfizer and asked them what is in these shots and doesn't matter. And they were handed an answer saying it's of no consequence. I'm going to show you why they're wrong on those three points. Let's back up a little bit. What happened here, in the clinical trials, they actually ran the clinical trial and clean DNA that was PCR amplified from a plasmid template, all right. That makes it a million fold cleaner above background. They then did a bait and switch. And when they went to the mass market with this, they gave everyone vaccines that skipped that PCR step and therefore was working off of plasma DNA alone. What that means is more background DNA from the plasma gets into the vaccines and more endotoxin presumably gets into the vaccines. This bait and switch was documented into Rest of Levy had published this. So what did they hand to the regulators? They handed the regulators this plasmid map on the right, which you'll notice is missing any sequence annotation from 6 to 9 on the map. That's very awkward. If you ever use plasmid annotation tools, they annotate everything on the map and they don't leave anything unannotated. So some big advisor had to go in and actively delete this annotation and hand it to the regulators and market. And so we're seeing a lot of growth in the market. And so we're seeing a lot of growth in the market. And so we're seeing a lot of growth in the market. And so we're seeing a lot of growth in the market. And so we're seeing a lot of growth in the market. Well, they're hiding the fact that this tool will define their system as a gene therapy, because it's a nuclear targeting sequencing. It moves DNA directly to the nucleus within hours in all cell lines, all right? Now they've also tried to attack the fact that we used expired vials. It's not true. We've had other people use vials that aren't expired. And this is a really bad position of theirs to take because they gave expired vials to patients. And it's very easy for you to measure whether something has decayed with an RNA integrity plot. We've done that. So this is a red herring. It's also a little bit bizarre. They've challenged that our PCR results aren't using proper methods. They have not published their methods. But you can go to Moderna's own patents, which will teach you that qPCR underestimates the problem, and therefore they had to invent new tools to get rid of the cna. Moderna does have cleaner vaccines, by the way, from a DNA standpoint. Why did they do this? Well, the regulators in some jurisdictions are letting them measure the DNA with 2 different yardsticks, and they care about a ratio of RNA to DNA. So what they do is they use a different method that inflates the RNA values, something known as fluorometry, and then they move to qPCR to measure the DNA. Now you've all probably had a COVID test or know that they measure RNA. So if you have primers that can measure DNA and you don't use them to measure the RNA, you are a fraud. And the regulators either don't know this or they are complicit in the crime. They're letting them use 2 different yarnsticks because without these 2 different yarnsticks, they can't pass these regulations.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(5/57) PROF. ANGUS DALGLEISH—“[The] synthetic DNA contamination…in…vials of the Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines…presents risks of genomic instability, which can manifest as cancers…” Professor Angus Dalgleish, a professor of oncology at St. George’s, University of London, describes in a presentation given to the Special Council at Port Hedland Town in Western Australia in 2024 how the DNA contamination found in the COVID mRNA injections by McKernan, et al. “can manifest as cancers, immune disorders, and hereditary diseases.” “Synthetic DNA contamination as detected in Australian vials of the Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines by David Speicher presents risks of genomic instability, which can manifest as cancers, immune disorders, and hereditary diseases,” Dalgleish says. “The vaccines contain lipid nanoparticles, which encapsulate synthetic DNA fragments. These nanoparticles deliver this DNA into various organs throughout the body, where the DNA has the potential to integrate into our own genetic material. As such these vaccines are not ‘vaccines,’ they are, in fact, gene therapy based. This genomic integration, as the scientific literature makes clear, can lead to cancer development, immune system disruption, and more. The sheer levels of contamination detected…in some cases are extraordinary, and far beyond what should be allowed in any medicinal product.” Dalgleish goes on to note: “While this may sound like a remote possibility…we are already seeing evidence of these effects in real patients. In my work as an oncologist in the U.K., I started to see a disturbing trend as early as February 2022. Patients who had been cancer free for many years were suddenly relapsing with aggressive, explosive cancers shortly after receiving booster doses of the COVID-19 vaccine. I personally counted six cases in as many weeks in patients who developed a rapid progression, having been completely stable, with zero disease, having been on an immunotherapy I had given them 5, 8, 10, 15, 18 years ago.” Dalgleish adds: “All these patients only had one thing in common, and that was they had all been forced to have a [COVID-injection] booster by their GPs on the grounds they were at risk. One of the most unsettling aspects of the nature of these cancers is that they are not slow progressing…they are aggressive, often presenting at advanced stages, affecting multiple organs by the time they are diagnosed. Colorectal cancer has specifically shown explosive growth—something we’ve never seen before. These cancers are emerging faster and more virulent than we would expect in patients who otherwise have been stable.” Dalgleish also notes a rise in blood cancers, such as leukemias and lymphomas, which have “appeared shortly after vaccinations.” “I have had many colleagues and patients express concerns about the timing of these cancers following what I believe are totally unnecessary boosters, which is not an isolated issue,” the oncologist goes on to say. “My own research has shown that the boosters suppress the T cell response and switch[es] the antibody response to tolerizing. That means this is the perfect example where you have switched off the policing of foreign invaders, viruses, etc. and cancer, allowing it to grow uncontrolled.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
Research indicates risks of foreign synthetic DNA integrating into human cells, potentially leading to serious health issues like cancer and immune disorders. Contamination found in Australian vials of Pfizer and Moderna vaccines raises concerns about genomic instability. These vaccines function more like gene therapy, as lipid nanoparticles deliver synthetic DNA into the body, where it may integrate into our genetic material. In clinical observations, patients who had been cancer-free for years experienced aggressive relapses after receiving COVID-19 booster doses. Notably, colorectal cancer cases are growing rapidly, and there is an increase in blood cancers like leukemias and lymphomas post-vaccination. The timing of these cancers has raised alarms among healthcare professionals. Research shows that boosters may suppress T-cell responses, impairing the immune system's ability to combat foreign invaders and cancer, leading to uncontrolled growth.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Decades of research have demonstrated the risks of foreign DMA integrating into human cells leading to potentially catastrophic outcomes. Synthetic DMA contamination as detected in Australian vials of the Pfizer and Moderna COVID 19 vaccines by David Spiker presents risks of a genomic instability which can manifest as cancers, immune disorders, and hereditary diseases. To explain in more straightforward terms, the vaccines contain lipid nanoparticles which encapsulate synthetic DNA fragments. These nanoparticles deliver this DNA into various organs throughout the body where the DNA has the potential to integrate into our own genetic material. As such, these vaccines are not vaccines. They are in fact a gene therapy based. This genomic integration, as the scientific literature makes clear, can lead to cancer development, immune system disruption, and more. The sheer levels of contamination detected up to a 145 times missile per missile limit in some cases are extraordinary and far beyond what should be allowed in any medicinal product. The real world evidence from the UK, While this may sound like a remote possibility, I am here to tell you that we are already seeing evidence of these effects in real patients. In my work as an oncologist in the UK, I started to see a disturbing trend as early as February 2022. Patients who had been cancer free for many years were suddenly relapsing with aggressive explosive cancers shortly after receiving booster doses of the COVID 19 vaccine. I personally counted 6 cases in as many weeks in patients who developed a rapid progression having been completely stable with 0 disease having been on the immunotherapy I gave them 5, 8, 10, 15, 18 years ago. I am used to people who, progress when they develop severe depression, such as during divorce, bereavement, debt, etcetera. But all these patients only had one thing in common, and that was they've all been forced to have a booster by the patient by their GPs on the grounds they were at risk. One of the most unsettling aspects in the nature of these cancers is that they're not slow progressing that we are accustomed to managing. They are aggressive, often presenting in advanced stages affecting multiple organs by the time they're diagnosed. Colorectal cancer, in particular, is showing explosive growth, something we've never seen before. These cancers are emerging faster and more virulent than we would expect in patients who otherwise been stable. In addition to cancer relapses, I've encountered a rise in blood cancers such as leukemias and lymphomas, which have appeared shortly after vaccinations. I have had many colleagues and patients express concerns about the timing of these cancers following what I believe to be totally unnecessary boosters. It is not an isolated issue. My own research has shown that the boosters suppress the t cell response and switch the antibody response to tolerizing. That means this is a perfect example where you have switched off the policing of foreign, invaders, viruses, etcetera, and cancer, allowing it to grow uncontrolled.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(6/57) DR. UTE KRÜGER—“Ultimately, I saw a correlation that the tumors appeared on average three [3] months after these so-called ‘vaccinations.’” In this clip from an interview with klaTVEnglish from 2024, Dr. Ute Krüger, a pathologist and breast cancer researcher in Sweden, describes her experience witnessing the exact same phenomenon Dr. Angus Dalgleish did in the previous tweet: explosive, aggressive cancers that appeared in cancer patients who were previously stable prior to receiving one or more COVID injections. Krüger describes how, following the rollout of the COVID injections, she began to see the largest tumors she had ever seen in her career. “And the tumors simply grew more aggressively, and there were more frequent occurrences, [meaning] relapses,” Krüger adds. The pathologist and breast cancer researcher notes: “Patients may have been tumor free for 20 years, and then a few months after these injections against corona, the tumor suddenly came back. And with such aggressiveness that the patients often died as a result.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
Tumors have been growing more aggressively, with sizes ranging from 4 to 16 centimeters, and patients experiencing frequent recurrences. Some patients, previously tumor-free for years, saw rapid tumor regrowth after COVID-19 vaccinations. Multifocal tumors, where multiple tumors appear in one breast, have also increased. For example, a 55-year-old patient had a 13-centimeter ductal carcinoma with over 20 invasive spots. Another case involved an 80-year-old who found a rapidly growing tumor in her previously operated breast just three months post-vaccination, along with skin metastases. Additionally, a 70-year-old woman with lobular breast cancer experienced explosive tumor growth in the liver after vaccination, leading to her death within a month. Observations indicate that tumors often reappear approximately three months after these vaccinations.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So in the past, a tumor was the size yeah. With the size of 4 centimeters was very rare. Now tumors were 4 to 16 centimeters. The largest tumor I've seen was 16 centimeters in size. You have to look at that on a ruler. It's huge. And the tumors simply grew more aggressively, and there were more frequent recurrences, so relapses. Patients may have been tumor free for 20 years, and then Speaker 1: a few months after these injections against corona, the tumor suddenly came back. And I'm not Speaker 0: against corona, the tumor Speaker 1: suddenly came back. And with Speaker 0: such aggressiveness that the patients often died as a result. And then I noticed that it occurred more frequently that there are several tumors in one breast, for for example. So multi multifocal tumors. And also that tumors occur in both breasts at the same time. Speaker 1: This foreign word means that there are several tumors in one place. Speaker 0: Yes. Exactly. The multifocality that there are several tumors in one breast. I brought some images with me of this, which show this, this multifocality. This is material from a 55 year old female patient who has a 130 millimeter ductal carcinoma. In other words, a tumor in the breast that is growing in the ducts. So 13 centimeters alone is extremely large. And in this area, she had 20 different so at least 20 different invasive. In other words, spots where the tumor had already grown out of the ducts and into the tissue. And here in the picture, you can see in the blue area, this is the area with the tumor in the ducts. And these red areas show these invasive foci where the tumor is already growing into the tissue. So here in this section alone, there are 7 invasive foci. Speaker 1: This picture here is a cross section? Speaker 0: Exactly. This is how the pathologist sees the material under the microscope. This is a cross section of the breast, and this is how the diagnosis finally made in pathology. There was also a pronounced growth in the lymph vessel far outside of the tumor. And she already had had 4 lymph node metastases. So the lymph nodes were already affected, which is also relatively rare. But that is because the tumor has grown so aggressively. And then I brought another picture on the subject of reoccurrence. This is an 80 year old patient who had undergone breast conserving therapy 7 years previously. This means that the area of the tumor was cut out of the breast and the rest of the breast was still there. And 3 months after this so called vaccination against corona, she found a tumor in this operated breast. And it grew extremely quickly. And in the surgical preparation, it was already 55 millimeters in size. So she also had several skin metastases in her breast at the same time. This is something that is extremely rare that the patient comes with a relapse and already has skin metastases at the same time. Those normally come much later. And here you can see the current surgical preparation. The green area is the scar from the operation 7 years ago. And then this red area right next to it here, that's the tumor that's growing there. It is only very small here, but you can see this direct connection to the scar. That's why I chose this cross section. And next, I also brought a cross section to illustrate the issue of tumor heterogeneity. And this means that the tumor can be found with different growth patterns. So this material is from a 70 year old woman who had had lobular breast cancer for several years, meaning a breast cancer that grows relatively slowly. And so she had had numerous metastases in the bladder, in the intestinal mucosa, in the bones, in the liver. And she had already lived with these metastases for 3 years. In other words, her body was in a state of relative equilibrium. But shortly after this so called vaccination, the tumor growth in the liver explodes, and the patient dies within a month. And the clinician who sent me this liver cylinder, so a cylindric sample punctured out of the liver, He wrote on the submission form that he had noticed that the tumor growth had exploded in the liver, but that nothing was visible at the other metastatic sites. And here, you can see normal liver tissue on the right side and this lobular tumor in the middle. You can't actually see very much of the tumor, but what you see are small dark dots. And on the far side, the far left side, this very dark area, this is the newly added tumor with the dark core and with the rapidly growing tumor. Ultimately, I saw the correlation that the tumors appeared on the average 3 months after these so called vaccinations.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(7/57) DR. JOHN CAMPBELL, describing the work of DR. DAVID SPEICHER—“The Moderna [injection] can contain up to 10 [trillion] copies of DNA fragments per dose.” In this clip from a video posted in October 2024, Dr. John Campbell, a semi-retired nurse lecturer, describes work performed by molecular virologist Dr. David Speicher, which found that in some of the COVID injection vials, there are 10 TRILLION copies of the DNA plasmids. Campbell notes that 3 to 10 copies is “enough to cause incorporation of SV40 DNA contamination into the nuclear genome of the cell, thereby causing a mutation, which has been identified in cell cultures in chromosomes 9 and 12, including an oncogene that can potentially cause cancer.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
Health Canada initially claimed the Pfizer vaccine did not contain SV40, but later acknowledged its presence, stating it has no functional role. Despite this, they sought clarification from Pfizer about the residual fragments. When asked for information, Health Canada provided redacted documents, raising questions about transparency. A technique called fluorometry, which labels DNA with fluorescent markers, revealed that some RNA vaccines, particularly Moderna's, could contain up to 10 trillion copies of DNA fragments per dose. This is concerning because just 3 to 10 copies can facilitate the incorporation of SV40 DNA into a cell's nuclear genome, potentially leading to mutations associated with cancer.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Health Canada has said there's no increased risk of cancers, and they also said at first that the Pfizer vaccine does not contain SV 40, but they were wrong. It does. They later said that although the SV 40 is present, so a bit of backpedaling there from Health Canada, that, the SV 40 the the SV 40 is the the contamination sequence. One of the contamination sequences of DNA that can get back into the nuclear material of the cell and cause mutation. Health Canada says that's got no functional role. So first of all, they said it's not there, and they said, oh oh, you know what? It is there. And they said, but don't worry about it. It doesn't do anything. But then Health Canada asked Pfizer about the residual fragment. So having Health Canada declared that it does nothing, they then wrote to Pfizer. So Health Canada know that these, these this contaminating SV 40 potential cancer causing sequence is there. And then, Health Canada was asked like a freedom of information request. Health Canada was asked for this information from Pfizer, but it came back redacted. Why why would they want to hide the scientific information, Health Canada? Why would they want to do that? Now, doctor speaker uses a technique called a fluorometry. Now this basically attaches a fluorescent molecule to the DNA, and then that means when the DNA is present, you can see it with your microscope. It fluoresces, and you can you can actually see it. It's giving off light. Now this is a good technique. This fluorometry is a good technique to give quantitative analysis of all of the DNA. So it analyzes all of the DNA that's present. It's a better technique than quantitative PCR because it's analyzing all of the DNA and labeling with this fluorescent marker all of the DNA that's present. And, it's found that in some, DNA in some some RNA, vaccines, some RNA vaccines, there is 10,000,000,000,000 copies of this DNA sequence, per dose. Now I was taken aback by this. Doctor speaker was found that some, the Moderna one particularly, can contain up to 10,000,000, copies of DNA fragment per dose. And we've just said that 3 to 10 copies of s v 40 DNA fragment is enough to facilitate transport into the person's own DNA into the cellular nuclear DNA. So 3 to 10 copies per cell and up to 10,000,000,000,000 copies. So that means that potentially 1 trillion, that's a 1000,000,000,000 body cells could be transfected with foreign DNA, and and that just I was taken aback by that. So, so 10,000,000,000,000 copies of DNA contamination potentially present per dose, 3 to 10 copies enough to cause incorporation of SV40, DNA contamination into the nuclear genome of the cell thereby causing a mutation which has been identified in cell cultures in chromosomes 9 and 12 including an oncogene that can potentially cause cancer, 10,000,000,000,000 copies per dose or up to that.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(8/57) DR. ANGUS DALGLEISH (PT. 2)—“The Pfizer [injections] are all full of SV40 [and] SV40 was what, in my day, we put into mice to make them grow tumors…” Here is Professor Angus Dalgleish once again, this time in a clip taken from a discussion with Charles Kovess et al. from December of 2024. Dalgleish notes the following: "It's obvious talking to everybody and all the presentations I've been to....[that] they're [the COVID injections] all completely contaminated. They're just not fit for purpose," Dalgleish says. "The Pfizer [injections] are all full of SV40 [and] SV40 was what, in my day, we put into mice to make them grow tumors so we could pour chemotherapy into them to see if it worked for the tumors. And we are putting this into humans for a disease that hasn't killed anybody for at least two years. It is beyond belief, and that's really what I cannot understand."

Video Transcript AI Summary
The recent discussions in Australia highlight serious concerns about messenger RNA vaccines, particularly those from Pfizer, which are reportedly contaminated with SV 40, a substance previously used in animal studies for tumor growth. This raises alarming questions about their safety, especially since COVID-19 hasn't posed a significant threat in over two years. Additionally, a deal between the Australian Prime Minister and Moderna for a ten-year supply of vaccines, costing 2 billion Australian dollars and intended for children, is particularly troubling. The implications of using gene therapy in this manner are deeply concerning, and there is a call for accountability from those behind these vaccine manufacturers.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's obvious talking to everybody and all the presentations I've been to Australia and since I've come back and that magnificent, that Perth conference, with the, the the debate with the, premier of Western Australia and the head of the medicine there who didn't turn up to the debate and which I thought was was a very funny thing, but they got all the evidence that the messenger RNA vaccines there, they're all completely contaminated. They are just not fit for purpose. The Pfizer's are all full of SV 40. SV 40 was what in in my day, we put into mice to make them grow tumors so we could pour chemotherapy into them to see if it worked for the tumors. And we are putting this into humans for a disease that hasn't killed anybody for at least 2 years. It is beyond belief, and that's really what I cannot understand. Now today, I got sent something from Australia, which and I must say it's the closest I have to being holding my stomach and being sick. It was, Arace Morrison, the prime minister, doing a deal with Moderna for messenger RNA vaccines for the next 10 years that you will buy 2,000,000,000 Australian dollars of these vaccines off the next 10 years, and they will target all sorts of diseases, and they will be given to children. This is a a gene therapy that they didn't. How much were they bribed to do that because I must say, if I was given a $1,000,000,000 to do this and it meant it going into children, I would walk away even if it was 10,000,000. To me, it's beyond belief that you would even consider it. These people behind Moderna and Pfizer are just pure pure evil, and they must be held to account.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(9/57) DR. SUCHARIT BHAKDI—“The integration of any foreign gene into your chromosome can cause cancer immediately.” Sucharit Bhakdi, a retired Professor Emeritus of Medical Microbiology and Immunology and former Chair of the Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene at Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, describes in this clip taken from a conversation with Children’s Health Defense from May 2023 how the integration of foreign genes into a person’s genome can lead to cancer. Bhakdi notes that mRNA injections cause this type of damage because “the [DNA] plasmids, these foreign genes derived from bacteria, stolen from bacteria, enter the human cells, and…every cell that is genetically altered is doomed.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
Integrating foreign genes into chromosomes can lead to cancer, inflammation, and permanent genetic changes passed to offspring. This is a warning about the dangers posed by RNA vaccines being introduced globally by organizations like the WHO, CDC, and FDA. The initial vaccines are already causing harm due to the introduction of foreign genes into the body. The production of mRNA does not ensure that these bacterial genes will not enter human cells, resulting in genetic alteration. Every genetically altered cell faces dire consequences.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The integration of any foreign gene into your chromosome can cause cancer immediately, can cause all sorts of inflammation, and moreover, will cause this gene to be transmitted to your offspring. You will be genetically transformed forever. This is not a hate speech. This is a speech to make everyone wake up and see the dangers that they are facing because the WHO and the CDC and the FDA and all these guys up there are planning to introduce RNA vaccines worldwide everywhere and the first have already been introduced and they are causing the same damage that all the others are going to cause because a foreign gene is entering your body and because the production of this mRNA will never never guarantee that plasmids, these foreign genes derived from bacteria, stolen from bacteria, enter the human cells and what this means is that all humans who are injected with these bacterial plasmids or genes are genetically altered. And every cell that is genetically altered is doomed.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(10/57) KEVIN MCKERNAN (Pt. 2)—“This SV40 component…it interacts with P53 [which] is [the] guardian of the genome that’s supposed to keep our genome intact…[and] it’s the most cited gene in cancer.” In this clip from an interview Kevin McKernan did with Bret Weinstein, he notes that the SV40—which has been firmly established as being present in the DNA plasmid contamination in the COVID injections—interacts with P53, a gene that is commonly referred to as “the guardian of the genome.” “This SV40 component…it interacts with P53 [which] is [the] guardian of the genome that’s supposed to keep our genome intact,” McKernan says. “And now we have billions of these molecules being injected that we know interact with that.” Furthermore, McKernan adds that P53 is “the most cited gene in cancer,” and “if you mess with P53, you’re inviting cancer, particularly if you shut it down.” The scientist also notes that simply having fragmented DNA inside the cytosol of cells—that is, the liquid portion of the cytoplasm within a cell, where many biochemical reactions occur—is enough to cause cancer; meaning the DNA doesn’t even need to be imported into the nucleus of the cell. “It [the plasmids] doesn’t have to get into the nucleus to cause cancer. Just cytosolic presence of DNA like this can trigger this cGAS STING pathway,” McKernan notes. (The cGAS-STING pathway is an innate immune signaling route that detects cytosolic DNA to trigger an immune response, including inflammation and an antiviral defense.)

Video Transcript AI Summary
The SV40 component, highlighted by David Dean and others, interacts with p53, known as the "guardian of the genome," crucial for maintaining DNA integrity. The introduction of billions of these molecules raises concerns about their effects, especially since they bind to p53. Research from the Brown Cancer Institute suggests that the spike protein may alter p53 transcription, potentially leading to cancer if p53 is compromised. Damaged DNA fragments can trigger the cGAS-STING pathway, signaling danger within cells and potentially leading to oncogenesis. There is skepticism about whether this DNA enters the nucleus, but even its presence in the cytosol can be harmful. Observations of rare cancers in vaccinated children, particularly blood cancers like lymphoma, raise alarms about these potential risks.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This SV 40 component, that David Dean has published on being a gene therapy tool, it's also been published by David, I'm sorry, by Draymond et al, which, shows that it interacts with p 53. So p 53 is this guardian of the genome that's supposed to keep our genome intact. And now we have billions of these molecules being injected that we don't interact with that. Now we don't know what it does from the literature that's out there today. We just know that it it binds to p 53. We have, Walthak Aldeyary's work out of the Brown Cancer Institute showing that the spike protein itself may alter the the transcription of p 53. So there's a couple You wanna describe what p53 is when you say guardian of the genome? Yeah. So this is probably the most cited gene in cancer. And if you mess with p53, you're inviting cancer, particularly if you shut it down. This clean this mops up DNA that's been damaged. And now you're you're you're injecting your cells with these, shreds shrapnel DNA that that triggers that pathway. That triggers what's known as a c gas sting pathway, which is a pathway that when it sees broken DNA like that, interferon goes off being like there's something wrong here. We shouldn't have fragmented DNA inside the cytosol or in the nucleus. And that that pathway alone, if you trigger enough repeatedly, can lead to oncogenesis. So there there is a lot of, debunkers out there that try to say you can't prove this DNA is getting into the nucleus based on David Dean's work. We it doesn't have to get into the nucleus to cause cancer. It's just cytosolic presence of fragments of DNA like this can trigger this, cGAST thing pathway. So I've been trying to turn people's attention to cancer mainly because I'm seeing it. I I know kids that shouldn't have cancer because they got vaccinated. And, these are these are very rare cancers that you don't find in children, that are showing up for in close proximity to to usually blood cancers like lymphoma.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(11/57) DR. JANCI LINDSAY— “LNPs have been found to cause cancer cells that are already present to more readily spread by inducing endothelial leakiness.” In this clip from a presentation given for the World Council for Health, posted in 2023, toxicologist and molecular biologist Dr. Janci Linsday describes the nine (or more) ways the mRNA COVID injections can cause cancer. In her presentation, Lindsay notes that: –the injections use lipid nanoparticles (LNPs), which have been found to cause cancer cells that are already present to spread more readily –the LNPs may be oncogenic by themselves –the SV40 is a “super promoter” that is “great at driving gene expression,” and should it sit above an oncogene, you could have “an amplification of a cancer gene.” –the spike protein can interact with, and suppress, P53, the aforementioned “guardian of the genome.” –the injections can produce “frame shifted” proteins, which are aberrant and can themselves cause cancer –the mRNA in the injections itself can reverse transcribe into the genome, in turn causing insertional mutagenesis and cancer –the injections cause immunosuppression of T cells, which, in turn, can damage the immune system and lead to cancer (as previously mentioned in the thread)

Video Transcript AI Summary
There are several potential ways that lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) and mRNA can induce cancer. LNPs can transfect various cells, including hematopoietic stem cells, and may promote the spread of existing cancer cells. The SV40 elements in plasmids can drive gene expression, potentially amplifying oncogenes. The spike protein can inhibit tumor suppressor protein p53, and insertional mutagenesis can create aberrant proteins leading to cancer. mRNA can reverse transcribe to DNA, integrating into the genome, particularly in the ovaries and testes. Immunosuppression of T cells can allow cancer to expand. Concerns exist about the potential for genetic vaccines to be passed to offspring through germ cells, but this has not been adequately investigated. Integration into gametes could lead to genomic changes, raising the risk of cancer rather than functional integration.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So the 9 potential ways to induce cancer or more, 1, the lipid nanoparticles themselves can take mRNA and DNA to all cells. And they've been shown to readily transfect hematopoietic stem cells. LNPs have also been found to cause cancer cells that are already present to more readily spread by inducing endothelial leakiness. There may also be an oncogenic effect of the LMPs themselves, which has not yet been studied. As Kevin said, there are s v 40 elements to the plasmids. This is extremely concerning, particularly because they were not disclosed to regulators. So the s p 40 promoter is very promiscuous. It's a super promoter. It's it's great at driving gene expression. If and if that should sit above an oncogene, of course, you could have, an an explosion of an ample amplification in a cancer gene. The s v forty enhancer region, the nuclear targeting sequence, as Kevin described, also takes the DNA to the nucleus within a very short time period. It is designed to do that so that you get effective, gene therapy, gene, insertional, gene therapy. So the spike protein itself, can also interact with and inhibit the tumor suppressor protein p53 that was shown pretty early on. And then plasma DNA does not need to have the SV 40 sequences in order to, be able to cause insertional mutagenesis and to go to the nucleus. There are lots of proteins that assist in carrying and binding to and carrying that exogenous DNA to the nucleus where it can then be integrated. So insertional metagenesis can cause something called frameshift mutations, which also lead to aberrant proteins being made. Those aberrant proteins can also lead to cancer. MRNA itself can be reverse transcribed to DNA, and then also integrate in the genome, which causes cancers. And this is particularly true in the ovaries and the testes where line 1 is more, reverse transcriptase is more constitutively expressed. So that's a real concern there. RNA, through through a mechanism that I'll go through, coming up, can also be reverse transcribed to DNA and then that DNA back to RNA and then to cDNA, and and then be passed on. There's another mechanism called or there's another mechanism through which these could cause cancer, and that is through immunosuppression of t cells of the t cells, particularly, t cells that that keep cancer from expanding, in these stoichiometric niches where where they guard the cancer clone and keep it from expanding. We see this in our pets as they grow older, that once we have immunosensis and thymic involution, then you see an explosion in these sarcomas and lipomas and other cancers because of this, these T cells not being present to stop clonal expansion. So, there are different types of genetic mutations. There's somatic mutations, which only affect, the cells outside of the gametes. And then there's germline mutations, which affect the gametes. Now, here it says that a somatic mutation cannot result in a hereditary in hereditary passing on. But there is a mechanism through which you can have extra chromosomally passed genetic elements, be passed through sperm. And it is a very interesting mechanism of epigenetic regulation. And that is called sperm mediated gene transfer. Trying to make sure I don't go over here. So, ways to pass on genetic vaccines to progeny through both male and female germ cells. I spoke a little bit about this in, December of 2/22 at the US Senate. My my very large concern that these gene therapies will be passed on to our progeny and will contaminate the gene pool. And this is not being investigated at all. Not a single person has investigated sperm or ova to see if these are being genetically integrated. And I have reached out to multiple labs asking them if they would investigate this. We have an in vitro lab that is willing to work with anyone who, is willing to test both Sperminova for, for integration. So, in the first, you can have integration into the genome directly of gametes, from the DNA based vaccines or through reverse transcription of RNA, into the coding DNA. And, of course, the DNA plasmid sequences then make that possible as well. We know that these go to the testes and ovaries, and we know that they can be taken up there, and and integrated into the gametes. Genomic integration could result in cancers rather than just, functional integration. In fact, it's it's unlikely that we will have functional integration, into the genome creating a spike protein, but more likely that you'll have insertable mutagenesis leading to cancer.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(12/57) KEVIN MCKERNAN (Pt. 3)—“We have sequencing from a colon [tumor] biopsy from a patient who was four [4] times vaccinated…we can find [Pfizer-injection DNA] plasmids in there at a hundred copies per cell.” In this clip from a 2024 Mind & Matter podcast, we hear again from scientist Kevin McKernan, who describes finding the DNA plasmids from Pfizer’s mRNA COVID injection in a colon tumor from a—now deceased—individual who received four injections. ​​”We have sequencing from a colon biopsy from a patient who was four [4] times vaccinated. A year after vaccination, they had a colon cancer. They biopsied it that day, and then 30 days later, they died, and then they biopsied after, and we have sequencing on both the pre-mortem and post-mortem samples," McKernan says. The scientist and entrepreneur, often cited as the first person to find DNA contamination in the mRNA COVID injections, adds, "we can find plasmids in there a hundred copies per cell. They're not exactly the same as Pfizer's, which is a real head-scratcher, but they're in there." McKernan goes on to say: “The copy number alone suggests that these things aren't fully fragmented. Right? These plasmids really shouldn't be replicating to a hundred copies per cell." McKernan adds, "They shouldn't be in there at that level because if you just do the math on how much is in the vaccine, when you do an injection of this, this person has four vaccines...1.2 ml of Pfizer...went into about 87,000 mls [of] body volume. So you should have a massive dilution into your body. Yet when we're sequencing this and doing qPCR off the tumor, the CTs coming back off the tumor are almost as high as they are straight out of the vial."

Video Transcript AI Summary
We have sequenced samples from a colon biopsy of a patient who was vaccinated four times and developed colon cancer a year later. The sequencing revealed plasmids, with about 100 copies per cell, which differ from Pfizer's. This raises questions about potential variations in manufacturing or contamination. Preliminary data suggests these plasmids may integrate into the genome, with one integration observed on chromosome 21 affecting a cancer-related gene. The high copy number indicates replication, as the expected dilution from vaccination would not account for such levels. The formalin-fixed tissue confirms these plasmids were present while the patient was alive, but the source remains unknown.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We have done that. We haven't published the work yet, but we have sequencing from a colon, a colon biopsy from a patient who was 4 times vaccinated. A year after vaccination, they had a colon cancer. They biopsied it that day, and then 30 days later, they died, and then they biopsied after. And we have sequencing on both the the pre mortem and post mortem samples. And we can find plasmids in there a 100 copies per cell. They're they're not exactly the same as Pfizer's, which is a real head scratcher, but they're in there. And there's 2 of them. And there's there's a one encodes spike and one encodes nucleocapsid. We don't know why where the hell the nucleocapsid ones come from. Speaker 1: But if they got there from a Pfizer vaccination, why would the plasma be different than the Pfizer plasmid? Speaker 0: So that's a good question. Is do they have more than 1 in circulation? Like, is BioNTech got a different manufacturing plasmid than than the manufacturing plant out here in the US? Because they're making these in 2 different locations. Yep. It's possible. Is there contamination in their laboratory that, in the manufacturing of this, they get the wrong plasmid in their Erykolai pad, and suddenly they've got a different background there. Is there this possibility from the Beck paper I described in Seattle? Is that in play? And we've gotta do everything in our end to make sure we didn't introduce it, which we're doing. We're running all types of experiments to show that there's spike expression going on. Speaker 1: But there's any there's any number of reasons that could explain this. Speaker 0: Yes. Yeah. Yeah. So, but we also have data preliminarily back that's looking we run this program called ISLING. It's a really cool program that that's designed to look for vector integration into genomes, because they have to do this for a lot of gene therapy projects. And if you run that that program on on the on the sample, it does pop out a lot of integration events that we're now in the process of saying about verifying just to confirm that they're real. Speaker 1: So you guys are looking at and confirming whether these DNA plasmids are actually not only getting into human cells, but integrating into the nuclear genome. Speaker 0: Yes. Yeah. So we've got, you know, we've got a case now that that we're zeroing in on that looks like the SV 40 poly a signal, which is a termination signal. It's a transcription termination signal. We've got a piece of that integrating into chromosome 21, and it's breaking a gene that's involved in cancer. So, that that that one looks really interesting. Like, that could be maybe the driver of this whole thing. But the the program spits out a long list of potential integrations that we have to go through and and verify which ones are real and which ones are artifacts and all that. So I I wanna get ahead of ourselves on that. That's that hasn't been saying or verified yet. But, there the copy number alone is, suggests that these things aren't fully fragmented. Right? That these these plasmas really shouldn't be replicating to a 100 copies per cell. They couldn't they shouldn't be in there at that level, because if you just do the math on how much is in the vaccine Mhmm. After when you do an injection of of this this person has 4 vaccines, so 1.2 ml of Pfizer. That went into about 87,000 ml as your body volume. So you should have a massive dilution into your body. Yet when we're sequencing this and doing qPCR off the tumor, the CTs coming back off the tumor are almost as high as they are straight out of the vial. Yeah. Speaker 1: So basically what you're saying is in this case where you've got these biopsied cells from a tumor, you're finding on the order of a 100 copies of this DNA plasmid per cell. And in theory, if it is coming if the if you're just sort of injecting some with a jab, it's got these DNA contaminants, you should find many fewer than a 100 copies of plasmid per cell that's coming directly from the jab. So and so I think what you're implying is that this high number, a 100 or so per cell, implies that perhaps the cell itself replicated multiple copies of these. Speaker 0: Yes. Yeah. And I and even if it were an integration event, which I I do think there could be 2 things going on here. There there could be plasmids replicating episomally, and there could be parts of them integrated. But if it were purely integrated and the plasma was gone, we would not expect to see the copy number of what integrated to be higher than the copy number of the genome. Right? You'd get one integration into 1 chromosome probably, so it would be half the signal of what you get amplifying a human house gene like RNA p, which is what we use. You would get, you know, a similar CT if it integrated, because because if it were driver mutation, the the cells would take off, and it would maybe have one copy of that mutation with it. And as a tumor advanced, you would probably you expect to see a CT score in PCR for that region that was similar to the actual genome background, but we're not seeing that. We're seeing CTs that are that are way ahead. You know, if it's a 100 fold up there, it's around 6 to 7 CTs ahead of the RNA p gene, which is the human gene. And then when we do sequencing, we see the same thing. The coverage of sequencing is, like, 100 to 200 x in the plasmid is that when we're at 1x of the human genome. So they're they're in this tumor at really high levels, and that that tells us that it has to be replicating. And this was a formalin fixed tissue, so like it's not like we could sprinkle plasmids on it from our laboratory to contaminate that and have them be trans translationally active. Right? Yeah. Formalin is like this process when you take a tissue and you formalin fix it. It's like think of it as like carbon freezing Han Solo. Right. Right. Right. A nerd. Alright? So you can't add plasmid after the fact and get it to replicate on cells, and you can't add plasmids on the fact afterwards and get it to integrate. Like, the the those those things can only occur if the cells are live. So we're pretty certain we've we've ruled out that, alright, this isn't coming from us. The anti vaxxers aren't pouring plasmids on this great story. Okay? Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah. Speaker 0: This is this was this has this has certain biological signals that show this this was present in the patient when they were alive. We don't know the source of it. They were 4 times vaccinated, and one of the vaccines that they used, was one of the earliest vaccines from December 30, 2020.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(13/57) RETIRED PHARMA R&D EXECUTIVE SASHA LATYPOVA— “The FDA was fully aware that these things would cause cancer because they’ve written numerous guidance documents [saying so]; that’s how they regulate industry.” In this clip from an interview with Dr. Drew from 2024, retired pharma R&D executive Sasha Latypova describes how the "FDA was fully aware that these things [the COVID injections] would cause cancer, because they've written numerous guidance documents [saying so]; that's how they regulate industry.” Latypova notes that in “2015, 2013, even more recently than that, they wrote extensive guidance documents explaining to manufacturers who wanted to develop mRNA products that they need to study...cancer..." "They had this knowledge and they told manufacturers you have to study these risks and you have to exclude them and they were also not allowed to even study it in healthy volunteers because it was considered unethical," Latypova adds. "It was considered too dangerous. So then we come to 2020 [and] all of the sudden all of this is solved—this is a joke. To me, that's where I became extremely suspicious..." One such FDA guidance document referenced by Latypova is linked in tweet 39 of this mega-thread.

Video Transcript AI Summary
I recently met someone whose 18-year-old daughter developed cancer after receiving the Pfizer vaccine. I've heard from many parents who lost children to these injections, some experiencing immediate and horrific deaths. They repeatedly share their stories with lawmakers, highlighting a significant crime that must end. The FDA was aware of the potential cancer risks associated with these vaccines, as outlined in guidance documents from 2013 and 2015. These documents instructed manufacturers to study risks like cancer, fertility issues, and cardiovascular problems, and deemed it unethical to test on healthy volunteers. Yet, by 2020, these concerns were seemingly overlooked. This raises serious suspicions about the intentions behind the vaccine rollout, suggesting a premeditated crime where regulators and the military may have colluded with pharmaceutical companies.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I just had a guest in my house whose 18 year old daughter was injected with Pfizer, and she has cancer. I sat across numerous people who lost their children to these injections. Some died immediately. Some deaths were gruesome. And these people have to go and testify to lawmakers and anybody who would listen and recount the story over and over and over again. And this is a a massive, massive crime, and it needs to stop. Now FDA was fully aware that these things will cause cancer because they've written numerous guidance documents. That's how they regulate industry. So even in 2015, and I read those guidance documents, 2015, 2013, even more recently than that, they wrote extensive guidance documents explaining to the manufacturers who wanted to develop mRNA products That they need to study, especially cancer, that these products can cause death, that these products can cause fertility issues, blindness, strokes, cardiovascular issues, all of that is written because that's called regulatory knowledge. They have this knowledge. And they told manufacturers, you have to study these risks and you have to exclude them. And they were also not allowed to even study it in healthy volunteers because it was considered unethical. It was considered too dangerous. So then we come to 2020, all of a sudden all of this is solved. This is a joke, okay? So to me, that's where I became extremely suspicious and started looking into it for myself. But that's what I'm telling you. It's a premeditated crime, regulators knew, and the military conducted this fake exercise to capture all these pharma companies and make them make these weapons.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(14/57) DR. JAMES ROYLE— “In addition to the increase in all-cause excess deaths in highly vaccinated countries since the gene based–injectable rollout, there has been observed an alarming and significant increase in cancers.” In this 2024 presentation for the Stone Summit, U.K.-based surgeon Dr. James Royle describes seeing the same kinds of phenomena regarding turbo cancers as described by Professor Angus Dalgleish, Dr. Ryan Cole, Dr. Ute Krüger, et al. He also notes that the excuses for these cancers that have been used to deflect away from the COVID injections as the cause don’t make any logical sense. “In addition to the increase in all-cause excess deaths in highly vaccinated countries since the gene-based injectable rollout, there has been observed an alarming and significant increase in cancers,” Royle says. “These cancers have been termed colloquially ‘turbo cancers.’ Obviously, this is not a scientific term, but reflects the different aggressive biological nature that seems to be being observed by the public as well as clinicians…There was [also] a clear, dramatic increase [in cancer rates] that occurred in 2021 shortly after the rollout.” Royle goes on to note the following: “A robust study recently published from Japan now [retracted] by the journal after significant pressure showed cancer-related excess mortality in vaccinated populations. Cancer is being observed within all ages. It is my assertion shared by many experts oncologists and clinical colleagues around the world that the cancers we are seeing are extremely aggressive and are of a different biology. One study showed this dramatic increase, particularly in younger ages through 2021, [and in] 2022, [a] 7.9% increase.” The surgeon adds: “I've noticed aggressive widespread recurrences in previously successfully treated bowel cancer cases that I'd considered cured. Many metastases in these cases are unusual or atypical. Middle aged and elderly people are presenting with out-of-the-blue aggressive stage IV colorectal cancer who are incurable and die within weeks or months. In many of these cases, the entire liver appears to be filled with large, round tumor masses.” The prominent surgeon notes that “many of [his] multidisciplinary team colleagues, fellow surgeons, oncologists, pathologists, radiologists and specialist nurses have all acknowledged… [a] sudden change in patterns and [a] dramatic increase in these aggressive incurable advanced cancers…observed in these past two years. However, none of them can offer an explanation.” “This post-2021 increase cannot be explained by a sudden population-wide change in environmental toxins,” Royle notes. “Ultra-processed foods are not new. We already had an obesity epidemic prior to COVID-19,” the surgeon adds. “In any case, there is no valid argument that the increase is due to stopping [cancer] screening given we are seeing a particular increase in cancers in much younger people, 20 to 45 years of age. Screening services for colorectal cancer and breast and others typically start at 60 years [of age].”

Video Transcript AI Summary
There has been a concerning rise in aggressive colorectal cancers, termed "turbocancers," particularly after the rollout of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines. This increase is observed across all age groups, with a notable spike in younger patients. The aggressive nature of these cancers is unusual, especially in elderly patients who typically present with operable stages. Various explanations, such as lifestyle factors and delayed diagnoses due to lockdowns, do not account for the sudden changes seen post-2021. A correlation exists between the vaccine rollout and the rise in cancer cases, suggesting potential mechanisms related to immunosuppression and other biological disruptions. Despite reporting these observations, feedback from health authorities has been minimal. Many healthcare professionals share similar concerns but hesitate to voice them due to fear of repercussions. There is a growing consensus that the vaccines may not be safe or effective, and calls for their cessation are increasing.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Finally, I need to talk about cancer, particularly colorectal cancers. In addition to the increase in all cause excess deaths in highly vaccinated countries since the gene based injectable rollout, there has been observed an alarming and significant increase in cancers. These cancers have been termed colloquially turbocancers. Obviously, this is not a scientific term, but reflects the different aggressive biological nature that seems to be being observed by the public as well as clinicians. Despite recent articles claiming that the sudden growth in cancers is not new, such as the Gaslighting article in the Daily Mail reporting on a baffling increase in trend in data from 1990 to 2019. There was a clear dramatic increase that occurred in 2021 shortly after the rollout. A robust study recently published from Japan, now redacted by the journal after significant pressure, showed cancer related excess mortality in vaccinated populations. Cancer is being observed within all ages. It is my assertion shared by many experts oncologists and clinical colleagues around the world that the cancers we are seeing are extremely aggressive and are of a different biology. One study showed this dramatic increase, particularly in younger ages through 2021, 5.6% increase, 2022, a 7.9% increase. I've noticed aggressive widespread recurrences in previously successfully treated bowel cancer cases that I consider cured. Many metastases in these cases are unusual or atypical. Middle aged and elderly people are presenting with out of the blue aggressive stage 4 colorectal cancer who are incurable and die within weeks or months. In many of these cases, the entire liver appears to be filled with large round tumor masses. It is horrific to see on a weekly basis in IMBT. In my experience, it is rare for colorectal cancer to be as aggressive in elderly. Usually, sporadic cancers that are diagnosed are still operable when they present. Elderly patients rarely present with stage IV disease and certainly not in the way I've started seeing. Recently, we've seen 3 patients presenting with synchronous cancers, that is 2 separate bowel cancers in different areas of the colon presenting at the same time. This was previously considered rare, less than 3%. 1 of 1 was middle aged, otherwise fit well with 2 bulky, locally invasive cancers, and one was very elderly with 2 primary cancers and liver metastases. Many of my multidisciplinary team colleagues, fellow surgeons, oncologists, pathologists, radiologists, and specialist nurses, have all acknowledged to me the sudden change in patterns and dramatic increase in these aggressive incurable advanced cancers that we've observed in these past 2 years. However, none of them can offer an explanation. Various theories have been suggested. So what then is causing the sudden increased incidence in the other 92% that we're seeing? Number 2, Western ultra processed diet obesity and sedentary lifestyles. Whilst these things have undoubtedly played a major role in the steady increase in cancer over the past 3 to 4 decades, they do not explain the post 2021 sudden increase and change in biology, aggressive nature. This post 2021 increase cannot be explained by a sudden population wide change in environmental toxins. Ultra processed foods are not new. We already had an obesity epidemic prior to COVID 19. Number 3, lockdowns causing delayed diagnosis and suspended cancer screening programs. The post 2021 surge in aggressive cancers in all ages cannot be blamed on lockdown and delayed diagnosis. As I showed earlier, during the 19 the COVID 19 pandemic, we did not stop our 2 week wait for colorectal pathways. We diagnosed and treated more rather than fewer cancers during lockdown as the only pathway that GPs can access. Therefore, this argument of stage migration or missed or delayed diagnosis does not hold true for colorectal cancer. Furthermore, colorectal screening services were only stopped for a few months of the first and second wave. In any case, there is no valid argument that the increase is due to stopping screening, given we are seeing a particular increase in cancers in much younger people, 20 to 45 years of age. Screening services for colorectal cancer and breast and others typically start at 60 years. Number 4, there's a close temporal association of the increasing cancers and the rollout of population wide mRNA COVID 19 genetic injections. The evident correlation fulfills the majority of the 9 Bradford Hill epidemiological criteria for causation. There are multiple plausible mechanisms that have been proposed by which cancer could be induced or potentiated, accelerated by the mRNA gene injections, including unacceptably high levels of bacterial plasmid contamination, the discovery of the SV40 tumor promoter, disruption of the p53 tumor suppressor, etcetera. These mechanisms are discussed widely by scientists and clinicians, such as doctor Kevin McKernan, professor Angliss Douglies, doctor William Mackis, and doctor Ryan Cole, a US pathologist, and many others and have been discussed on numerous international calls. More generally, the shots are clearly causing generalized immunosuppression. The immune system is grossly underestimated its complexity and importance in tumor surveillance in destroying mutated cells before they become cancers. Recently, other doctors have told me how they are seeing sudden recurrences of cancers that have been cured 10 or even 15 years earlier. I submitted over 20 yellow cards from June 2021. I could have submitted many more, but it was becoming very apparent that the MHRA was ignoring the data. I've never been given any feedback on any analysis of my cases or even acknowledgment, except the 2 or 3 cases where further clarifying information that I'd already provided was requested. I was given no information back from the MHRA to indicate that they were looking at yellow card data or analyzing it. Despite this, the safety signal from both the MHRA and the VAERS system in the United States is unprecedented and undeniably obvious. Presenting this information formally, I've received mixed responses. More recently, in my more departmental morbidity and mortality meetings, there's been a more open acknowledgment that perhaps some observed events, such as ischemic bowel cases, may have been related to vaccines. I've had a number of conversations with 2 colorectal colleagues in other areas of the country who've had similar shared experiences. They're in agreement with the observed patterns of thrombotic, infective and inflammatory, and malignant disease. I've had the opportunity to give a presentation to an international surgical meeting in London in March 2023. At the end, I was congratulated on my perceived courage in standing up and speaking about these concerns. There was general agreement in the room, 30 or more surgeons. Many offered acknowledgment and similar observations, but had been unwilling to raise their concerns for fear of repercussions. In fact, a rather alarmed, eminent, retired surgeon present stated it was our duty to raise these concerns. In conclusion, the data are clear that COVID 19 vaccines are neither effective or safe. My own personal observations have been increasingly backed up by other data around the world and research studies as well as expert opinion in other centers. I personally demand that these injections and any promotion of them be stopped with immediate effect. Thank you for your attention.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(15/57) DR. WILLIAM MAKIS— “Once the vaccines roll out in 2021, you see a statistically significant rise in cancer, and it rises every single year since then…there’s some kind of damage that…can manifest years after you’ve had your last COVID vaccines.” In this clip from a discussion with pediatrician Dr. Paul Thomas, oncologist, radiologist, and cancer researcher Dr. William Makis describes some of the work that’s been done by The Ethical Skeptic on cancer trends following the rollout of the COVID injections. Makis notes that there was a “statistically significant rise in cancer” in the U.S. following the rollout of the COVID injections. Furthermore, he says that the injections cause “some kind of damage that…can manifest years after you’ve had your last COVID vaccines.” "I love the work of Ethical Skeptic, and this is his work," Makis says of the graph he presents for Thomas. "This is a data analyst on X...and he looks at CDC data, and he finds these trends that are really fascinating." "These are deaths from malignant neoplasms in...a younger cohort, ages 0 to 54," Makis says. "And you see that really, in 2020, you don't see much in terms of a [rise in] cancer. There seems to be a slight blip above trend line, but it's sort of still hovering around a long-term trend line. And then once the vaccines roll out in 2021, then you see a statistically significant rise in cancer, and it rises every single year since then." Ethical Skeptic "calls it a 12-sigma event, which is...I'm not even gonna try to describe what that means, how astronomically unlikely this is to be a sort of a random thing or a coincidence," Makis says. "This is a very real trend. I'm seeing it in thousands and thousands of young people," the cancer researcher adds. "And what's shocking and what's particularly concerning about this graph—and I really want people to pay attention to this—is that people stopped taking booster shots. People have, by and large, stopped taking booster shots. But the trend continues. And it's a very steady upward trend. There's no sign of it leveling off or stopping, or reversing. And this has me really, really concerned for the long term." Makis goes on to say: "Initially, I started seeing these patterns...Someone would take a COVID vaccine and then they would be diagnosed with a stage 4 cancer out of the blue four months later, six months later. And I thought, 'Okay. Well, maybe there's a pattern here. Maybe there's a sort of a certain time that's required for cancer to develop.' And through my research, I found, for example, that there is a shift in the type of antibodies that we produce. It's called the IgG4 shift. And IgG4 antibodies start being produced once you've been exposed to multiple shots, once you've had at least two COVID vaccines. And these are called tolerance antibodies. This is where your...immune system starts tolerating the antigen, which is the spike protein; but it also starts tolerating cancer and cancer cells. And that takes a few months. That whole shift takes several months to happen. "But then I start[ed] seeing cases where the young person hasn't taken a shot in the last two years, then they're just suddenly diagnosed with an aggressive stage 4 cancer that behaves the way these mRNA vaccine–induced turbo cancers are behaving, and they [the patients] have a very, very poor prognosis. They don't respond to chemotherapy or radiation therapy or even immunotherapy, and then they die approximately six to 12 months after diagnosis. So there is a long-term effect, and that is the one thing that really has me concerned...that there is something that happens to people who've had the vaccines that is permanent. There's some kind of damage that appears to be permanent, and it can manifest years after you've had your last COVID vaccines. And this is really, really, concerning for me."

Video Transcript AI Summary
A recent analysis of CDC data shows a concerning trend in cancer deaths among individuals aged 0 to 54. Before 2020, cancer rates were stable, but after the rollout of COVID vaccines in 2021, there has been a statistically significant rise in cancer cases each year. This trend persists despite a decrease in booster vaccinations, suggesting potential long-term effects from the initial vaccines. Observations indicate that some individuals develop aggressive stage 4 cancers months after vaccination, with poor responses to treatment. Research indicates a shift in antibody production, which may lead to the immune system tolerating both the spike protein and cancer cells. This raises concerns about permanent damage from the vaccines that could manifest years later.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You have an, slide, I believe, that shows the trend in cancer. We maybe we should put that up, and then you can kind of share with our audience, what you're seeing here on this on this image. Speaker 1: You know, this is I love the work of ethical skeptic, and and this is, his work. This is a data analyst, on on x on Twitter, and he looks at CDC data, and and he he finds these these trends that are really fascinating. And and so he had released, his analysis recently about cancer. He puts this out every couple of months. And this is the trend that he's put out. These are deaths from malignant neoplasms and younger this is a younger cohort, ages 0 to 54. Speaker 0: Yeah. Speaker 1: And and you see that really in 2020, you don't see much in terms of a can a rising cancer. There seems to be a slight blip above, you know, trend line, but it's sort of it's still hovering around a long term trend line. And then once the vaccines roll out in 2021, then you see a statistically significant rise in cancer, and it rises every single year since then. I mean and he calls it a 12 sigma event, which is, you know, I mean, I'm not even gonna try to describe what, you know, what that means, how astronomically unlikely this is to be a sort of a random thing or or a coincidence. This is a very real trend. I'm seeing it in 1,000 and 1,000 of of young people. And and what's what's shocking and what's particularly concerning about this graph, and I really, you know, want people to pay attention to this, is that people stop taking booster shots. People have, by and large, stopped taking Right. Speaker 0: But the trend continues. Speaker 1: But the trend continues. And it's a very steady upward trend. There's no sign of it leveling off or stopping, or reversing. And this has me really, really concerned, for the long term. Speaker 0: Yeah. That point you just made to me means and correct me if I'm wrong. I'm just sort of thinking it through. A lot of people aren't taking the boosters anymore. So the risk has to have come from the prior vaccines they got, maybe even 2, 3 years ago, speaking to speaking to the fact that it has perhaps permanently harmed our immune systems, those those people who have taken those jabs. Speaker 1: Exactly. And so initially, I started seeing these patterns. You know? Someone would take a COVID vaccine, and then they would be diagnosed with a stage 4 cancer out of the blue 4 months later, 6 months later. And I thought, okay, well maybe there's a pattern here. Maybe there's a sort of a certain time that's required for cancer to develop. And and, you know, through my research, I found, for example, that there is a shift in the type of antibodies that we produce. It's called the IgG4 shift. And, you know, IgG4 antibodies start being produced once you've been exposed to multiple shots, once you've had at least 2 COVID vaccines. And these are called tolerance antibodies. This is where your body starts the immune system starts tolerating the antigen, which is, you know, the the spike protein, but it also starts tolerating cancer and cancer cells. And that takes a few months. That whole shift, you know, takes several months to to happen. But then, you know, I start seeing also cases where the young person hasn't taken a shot in the last 2 years. Then they're, you know, just suddenly diagnosed with an aggressive stage 4 cancer that behaves the way these mRNA vaccine induced turbocancers are behaving and they have a very, very poor prognosis. They don't respond to chemotherapy or radiation therapy or even immunotherapy and then they die approximately 6 to 12 months after diagnosis. So there is a long term effect. And that is the one that really has me concerned is that there is something that happens to people who've had the vaccines that is permanent. There's some kind of damage that appears to be permanent, and and it can manifest years after you've had your last COVID vaccines and and this is really really concerning for me.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(16/57) DR. CHARLES HOFFE—“In my practice now…approximately two-thirds of all cancer diagnoses—since the vax rollout—are stage 4.” Topping off the first section of this turbo cancer mega-thread, which features expert testimonials from around the Western world, we have a clip of family physician Dr. Charles Hoffe speaking on turbo cancers during a 2022 Children’s Health Defense virtual roundtable. Hoffe, who has more than 30 years of experience as a family physician, notes that “as a family doctor, over the years, a small percentage of the new cancer diagnoses would unfortunately be stage 4 at first diagnosis. But in [his] practice now…approximately two-thirds of all cancer diagnoses since the vax rollout are stage 4.” Hoffe notes, “pathologists around the world have noticed this—that, unfortunately, now people who had previous cancers, which were in remission, are flaring up since their shots because of the damage to their immune system by the COVID shots. [And with] new cancers being diagnosed, the tumors are bigger than ever. They seem to grow very aggressively, spread very aggressively, and be very resistant to treatment. So this has been nicknamed turbo cancer.” The veteran family physician goes on to describe one such case of turbo cancer he’s seen in a man who was mandated to get a COVID injection in order to keep his job. Hoffe shows how the man, a 61-year-old machine operator, developed a grapefruit-sized tumor in his lungs within months of getting his COVID injection. He also developed other tumors, including ones that grew along the vertebrae of his spine. Hoffe notes that the prognosis at the time was that the man would almost certainly die due to the aggressive cancers.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Cancer cases are increasingly being diagnosed at advanced stages, with many patients presenting with stage 4 cancers since the COVID vaccine rollout. One patient, a 61-year-old machine operator, experienced severe shortness of breath after receiving his second vaccine dose. Initially, his chest x-ray was normal, but by September, he developed back pain and underwent further imaging, revealing a grapefruit-sized tumor in his chest and another tumor near his lumbar vertebra. This rapid progression of aggressive tumors, referred to as "turbo cancer," highlights the alarming trend of aggressive cancer growth post-vaccination. Tragically, the patient’s prognosis is very poor, raising concerns about the impact of the vaccines on immune health.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, what we're seeing is also that people are starting to talk about the cancers which are appearing. Doctors are seeing them and also the the number of, of cases of cancer which, you know, are much advanced when they're first recognized and also they have distant spread. It's quite remarkable. Charles, are you seeing something like this in your practice? Speaker 1: Yeah. I in fact, I wanted to talk about one of my own patients. You know, it's it's it's fascinating as a as a family doctor, over the years, a small percentage of the new cancer diagnoses would unfortunately be stage 4 at first diagnosis. But in my practice now, it's approximately 2 thirds of all cancer diagnoses since the vax rollout, are stage 4. And so, you know, pathologists around the world have noticed this that unfortunately now people who had previous cancers which were in remission are flaring up since their shots because of the damage to their immune system by the COVID shots. But new cancers being diagnosed, the tumors are bigger than ever. They seem to grow very aggressively, spread very aggressively and be very resistant to treatment. So this has been nicknamed turbo cancer. So I wanted to just do a quick presentation of a gentleman who's been a patient of mine for about 20 years. So this gentleman is a 61 year old machine operator who was mandated to have the shots for his work. And so November last year, he had a second shot. After that, he complained to me that he was just out of breath, all the time. Just really felt short of breath. Couldn't do what he used to be able to do. I assumed he probably had micro clotting either in his lungs or his heart. So anyway, in December of last year, he was sent off for a chest x-ray, to investigate it. And so the slide on the left is his chest x-ray from December of last year which was completely normal. So then you'll see that this is the progression of events. This year, in September of this year, he started to develop a low back pain that radiated down into his thigh and his buttock that seemed like sciatica. And, he eventually got bad enough that he went into an ER where he had a chest x-ray and a CT scan. So as you remember, he had a normal chest x-ray 1 month after his COVID shot. The chest x-ray on the right hand side which you can you might be able to see, he has got literally a grapefruit sized tumor in the center of his chest. So you can see it right in compare the size, you can see the lung on the left side in the left x-ray, you can see that's what a right lung should look like. Now obviously the patient's right lung is on our left because they're facing us. And so you can see the two lobes of that lung are collapsed and how much smaller that lung is. But he literally has a 4 inch diameter tumor that's displacing his trachea right in the center of his chest that has grown since his first x-ray, which was 10 months before. Now this is astonishing for a primary tumor to grow from being invisible 10 months ago to literally 4 inches or 10 centimeters in diameter in that space of time. Now his back pain was being caused by a secondary which was his first symptoms. He had a 2 and a half inch diameter, a 6 centimeter diameter tumor adjacent to his 4th lumbar vertebra, which was impinging on the nerves and causing his back pain and had caused collapse of that vertebra. So this is a real case of turbocancer tragically in this patient who was mandated to have these shots in order to keep his job and unfortunately now I don't think his chances of surviving this are pretty close to 0. This is a highly aggressive cancer. So this is tragic. It is absolutely tragic. The people were were given these shots to keep them safe and and it is just devastating what this is doing.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(17/57) DR. MICHAEL HUANG—“The clinic I work at, it's about 30 physicians…in the past year, I've learned that two out of the 30 physicians I work with were diagnosed with aggressive advanced cancer, and one of them died because of that.” Starting off our testimonies portion of this turbo-cancer mega-thread, we have Dr. Michael Huang, a family medicine physician in California, describing during a 2024 conversation with Charles Kovess, et al. how he started to see aggressive cancers crop up in his colleagues following the rollout of the COVID injections. Huang tells Kovess, et al.: “I have seen what has happened when my friends have taken the shots. I used to work at Kaiser. It's a large management group. And the clinic I work at, it's about 30 physicians. And, you know, physicians, we are usually trying to stay healthy, trying to avoid harms. We don't smoke. We don't drink. And, unfortunately, in the past year, I've learned that two out of the 30 physicians I work with were diagnosed with aggressive advanced cancer, and one of them died because of that. Almost monthly, I will hear about one or two physicians [who] die suddenly. And most recently, we know this family practice resident who's in his thirties. We have seen him about a month ago, healthy, vibrant, and he suddenly died of advanced gastric cancer and left an unborn child as a result. So we start to see the results of healthcare providers playing Russian Roulette, getting the shots as they're…leading their patients, setting examples, getting their booster shots and getting injured from these experimental vaccines.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
I've lost all my friends during my medical training because they thought I was crazy. In the past year, I've witnessed alarming health issues among my colleagues. Out of 30 physicians at my clinic, two were diagnosed with aggressive cancer, and one died. It's become common to hear about physicians dying suddenly. Recently, a healthy family practice resident in his thirties died from advanced gastric cancer, leaving behind an unborn child. This situation highlights the risks healthcare providers face when they receive these experimental vaccines, which they promote to their patients while potentially suffering serious health consequences themselves.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I've lost every friend I had, through my medical training because they everyone thought I was nuts. I was crazy. But in the past year, I have seen what has happened when my friends have taken the shots. I used to work at Kaiser. It's a large, management group. And the clinic I work at, it's about 30 physicians. And, you know, physician, we are usually trying to stay healthy, trying to avoid harms. We don't smoke. We don't drink. And unfortunately, in the past year, I have learned that 2 out of the 30 physician I worked with were diagnosed with aggressive advanced cancer and one of them died, because of that. Almost monthly, I will hear 1 or 2 physician will die suddenly and most recently, we know this, family practice resident who's in his thirties, we have seen him about a month ago, healthy, vibrant, and he suddenly died of, advanced gastric cancer and and left an unborn child as a result. So we start to see the results of health care provider, playing the Russian roulette, getting the shots as their lead leading their physician leading their patients, setting examples, getting their booster shots and getting injured from these experimental vaccines.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(18/57) NURSE DAWN—“This is a huge tumor about the size of a softball behind my eye. And I had [metastases] to the back of my skull and 12 different areas of my bones.” In this clip taken from a 2023 interview with Children’s Health Defense, Dawn, a nurse, describes how she developed cancers throughout her body after receiving two Moderna COVID injections. Dawn describes how the cancer is “muscle-loving,” appearing throughout her body, and did not respond to treatment. Dawn also shows how she developed a “huge tumor about the size of a softball” behind her eye” and had “[metastases] to the back of [her] skull and 12 different areas of [her] bones.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
I received my first Moderna shot in December 2020, followed by a second in January. Shortly after, I experienced severe headaches and vision changes, which I initially attributed to hormonal issues. An ER visit revealed a large tumor behind my eye and metastases in my skull and bones, diagnosed as myelosarcoma. This aggressive cancer is rare, typically found in children and dogs post-vaccination. I went through multiple hospitals before receiving treatment at Moffitt Cancer Center, including a clinical trial, chemotherapy, and radiation. After a few months of remission, the cancer returned in my pancreas, kidney, liver, and shoulder, as it can spread throughout the body.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Okay. So after your 3rd, any injuries or you just Speaker 1: I had cancer at the time. Speaker 0: Oh, you're off your 3rd shot. I thought you said it's 5 months after. Speaker 1: That was after the booster. Okay. So, basically, I got the, first, shot Moderna in 2020 when they first came out at the end of December. And then I got the the other one in January, and then I ended up, having the worst headache of my life with, basically my eye was bulging on my head. It yeah. It was crushing my nasals and basically, it was causing vision changes. Speaker 0: Talk talk us through this. Speaker 1: It was causing vision changes where it was looking like seventies picture where where, like, color fades and everything. And, basically, at that time, my dog also had, like, a infection in his eye, so I was using his eye steroids. Speaker 0: So I thought it was just like a regular eye thing, and I checked into the ER. And that's how Speaker 1: I found out I had cancer. And basically Speaker 0: So what are we looking at here? These are your eyes. Speaker 1: Those are my eyes. This is a huge tumor about the size of a softball behind my eye, and I had METs to the back of my skull and 12 different areas of my bones. And, basically, what this cancer is, it's called, myelosarcoma, which is muscle loving. So it can go anywhere in your body. I How Speaker 0: but how my question is this. If it's 5 months after your Moderna shots, how long do you know how long it would take to grow a tumor that big? Speaker 1: I would they said it was the most aggressive cancer that they've seen, but I was developing mild headaches, like, after the Moderna shot, but I didn't think anything of it because I thought I was, perimenopausal because I had a hysterectomy. So I'm, like, I didn't know if I was because I still have my ovaries. Sorry. I'm talking with my hands. So I just basically thought it was just like a hormone thing. And then I they checked the pressure in my eye and my eye was bulging out of basically my head. The pressure was up and I found out. Speaker 0: They do to help you? Is that human out? Speaker 1: Basically, I got bounced around from hospital to hospital because nobody ever seen this type of tumor before. It's usually found in, little kids and also dogs after post rabies vaccinations. And, basically, I was transferred up to Tampa General, which is an hour away. They wanted to do a biopsy of it at the bedside because there wasn't enough operating rooms during COVID time, and I'm like, there's no way you're gonna do that to me. And then I ended up going to see a cancer specialist here. They didn't wanna touch me because they've never seen this before. So I ended up going to Moffett, Cancer Center, and they had to give me a pediatric, cancer doctor to take care of me that only seen a couple cases of this before in kids. And, basically, I ended up doing a medical clinical medical trial that's NIH approved and FDA approved. And I ended up over a 120 hours of chemotherapy. I had 90 sessions of radiation and over 40 days of staying in the hospital where they thought I was going to die. Speaker 0: And and then what happened? Speaker 1: And, basically, I had a few months of remission, and then the cancer came back again. Speaker 0: In the same place? Speaker 1: In a different place. This the second time it came back, it was in my pancreas and between my kidney and my liver and in my shoulder. And they said it because it's muscle loving, it can Speaker 0: show Speaker 1: up anywhere.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(19/57) MODERNA COVID INJECTION–TRIAL PARTICIPANT—“I know I got this vaccine that's caused me to have a rare cancer that has progressed way faster than it was supposed to.” In this clip from a HighWire segment, we hear from a participant of Moderna’s COVID-injection “clinical trial” describe how she developed T-cell lymphoma—a type of cancer that originates from T cells, a type of white blood cell in the immune system—following receipt of her injection. Since being diagnosed, the trial participant notes that she’s been to the doctor approximately 200 times and has had four surgeries. Despite the doctors’ visits and surgeries, however, the participant notes her cancer has only become “worse.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
It's been over two years since I joined the Moderna trial, and I've had numerous doctor visits and surgeries. Recently, I went to my dermatologist for an unbearable itch, leading to a biopsy that suggested T cell lymphoma. Further biopsies confirmed the diagnosis. I was told it was a slow-moving cancer, but soon developed rashes treated with a powerful retinoid, which caused severe side effects. After a brief period of improvement, the lymphoma worsened, resulting in painful, bubbly rashes that made it difficult to wear normal clothing. A blood test revealed the presence of Caesare cells, indicating blood involvement. I believe this vaccine has contributed to the rapid progression of my rare cancer, and now I can only have faith in God.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's been just a little over 2 years since I joined the Moderna trial. And I've been to the doctor probably 200 times. I know I had 4 surgeries. And I've gotten worse. I went into my dermatologist for this itch on my back that was driving me crazy. It had been itching and itching. I couldn't stand it anymore. I couldn't sleep. So she did a biopsy, and almost 2 weeks go by, and then she calls me and she says, we saw something that looks suggestive of T cell lymphoma. So they did 4 more biopsies. 1 on my right arm, 1 on my back, 1 on my stomach, and then one on my left back's arm. And they all came back just suggestive of t cell lymphoma except for the one on my back's arm came back definite t cell lymphoma. They told me that you have a very slow moving cancer, and and don't worry, and everything's gonna be fine. Sure enough, a month later, I had a rash on my stomach and a rash on my back. They treated me with a very powerful retinoid called Acetritin. But unfortunately, I had a lot of severe side effects from it. It seemed to work on my skin for about a month or 2, but then it just stopped working. And I just had, like, this lymphoma explosion all over my skin. Very uncomfortable, like, bubbly rash. It burned, and clothing bothered me. I could only wear, like, nightgowns around the house that were very soft and loose dresses when I went anywhere. So they wanted to do another blood test, and then the Caesare cells showed up. That's what they call t cell lymphoma, and with blood involvement, they're called Caesare cells. I know I got this vaccine that's caused me to have a rare cancer that has progressed way faster than it was supposed to. This is beyond my control. My only option is to just have faith in God.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(20/57) JILL KLEISS— “Shortly after I had my vaccine, two weeks later, I went to have my routine mammogram…[months later] I insisted on a biopsy…[and was told I] have the same breast cancer again [that I had prior to the ‘vaccine’] on the other side.” In this clip we hear from Jill Kleiss, also known as the Chemo Dancer on YouTube, who describes how she developed breast cancer following her COVID injection. Kleiss, who had had breast cancer prior to receiving the injection, developed cancer in the breast that had previously been healthy and cancer-free.

Video Transcript AI Summary
I had a mammogram that revealed a COVID node, which my doctor assured me was harmless. After receiving the vaccine, I had another mammogram, and again, they found a COVID node. My oncologist suggested a biopsy, which I insisted on despite initial resistance from my doctors. Eventually, they agreed to the biopsy. While substitute teaching, I received the call confirming my worst fear: I had breast cancer again, this time on the other side. I felt numb but reminded myself that I had overcome this before. If I hadn't detected the cancer through the enlarged lymph node, it might have gone unnoticed for a year, allowing the HER2 positive cancer to spread.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I had a mammogram. The doctors found something, and they told me it was a COVID node. She told me the COVID node was nothing to worry about, and my biggest fear was having to have chemo again. It was really hard to go through, but luckily, I only needed surgery and I didn't have to have chemo. Then COVID hit and I knew I had a compromised immunity. So I knew I wanted to get the vaccine as soon as possible. Shortly after I had my vaccine, 2 weeks later, I went to have my routine mammogram. The doctors found something, and they told me it was a COVID node. She told me the COVID node was nothing to worry about. It happened with a vaccine. So we'll check it 3 months later with an ultrasound. And then I went to see my surgeon, oncologist, and he said, Jill, you have a COVID note. I said, yeah. I looked into that. I said, nothing to worry about, I was told. And he said, when you get the ultrasound, you should do a biopsy too. So I insisted on a biopsy. They didn't wanna do it. I knew I had to be aggressive on this one. Everybody tried to discourage me. My doctors tried to discourage me. There was a lot of back and forth. And then finally, I got agreement that they were going to do a biopsy. I went back to work, substitute teaching, and I'm on the playground, and I get the call. And as soon as she picked up the call, I knew. I said, it's bad news, isn't it? And she said, you have the same breast cancer again on the other side. I was kind of numb of, okay, Jill. You did it before. You can do it again and just get through it. If I hadn't found the cancer to the enlarged lymph node that my body was alerting me I had cancer, I would have been dead in a year because they would have found the cancer till 1 year later in my next mammogram when HER2 positive had invaded my body.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(21/57) CHILDREN’S HEALTH DEFENSE BUS STORY—“[After receiving his COVID injection], all of the sudden he had multiple cancers, fluid buildup around the heart, [and] pneumonia.” In this clip from a Children’s Health Defense bus story, we hear from a gentleman who describes a cousin of his who developed brain and lung cancer following receipt of his COVID injection. The gentleman notes that his cousin subsequently died—the time between the development of the cancers and death was less than a year.

Video Transcript AI Summary
In the summer of 2022, I saw my cousin, who had just retired and was dealing with back issues. Shortly after, he was found to have fluid around his heart and was diagnosed with lung cancer. His surgery for the back was postponed for treatment, but they couldn't identify the cause of the fluid. Eventually, he was also diagnosed with brain cancer. Due to his deteriorating condition, they decided against radiation after chemotherapy. He developed pneumonia while hospitalized and passed away in January. From being relatively healthy in July, he faced multiple severe health issues in a short time. His family was fully vaccinated, and his daughter was particularly cautious during COVID, not allowing anyone in the house.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I also have a cousin. It is 2023 right now. He summer of 2022, I had seen him 4th July. He was a a union brother as well. He had some back problems. He had just retired. And he was supposed to go in for surgery for his back, but he was discovered to have fluid build up around the heart and also was diagnosed with lung cancer. He went in for treatment, and they paused the surgery for his back. He went in for treatment for the lung cancer, and they couldn't find out what was causing the the fluid around the heart. And, subsequently, they also discovered he had brain cancer. And then, ultimately, they 4 they decided not to go with the radiation after the chemo because he was in such bad shape. And then he developed pneumonia while in the hospital and subsequently passed away in, I think it was January. So from 4th of July, he was totally fine other than the back problem. Right? He had a little he'd always had back trouble, degenerative discs. But then all of a sudden, multiple cancers, fluid build up around the heart, pneumonia. And you knew that he took the shot? Yes. His daughter wouldn't even let them in the house during COVID because she was so afraid. So there is no doubt in my mind their whole family was fully up to date. His wife, my other cousin, I know I know she has taken it. I know I know he had taken it. And and, you know, how many, I don't know, but I definitely know that they were they were vaccinated.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(22/57) CHILDREN’S HEALTH DEFENSE BUS STORY—”I…have three aunts that had turbo cancer from the COVID shot. They all died last year. Within months of each other.” A woman describes for Children’s Health Defense how three of her aunts all developed turbo cancer following their receipt of one or more COVID injections. She notes they all died within months of each other.

Video Transcript AI Summary
I have three aunts who developed aggressive cancer after receiving the COVID vaccine, and they all passed away last year within months of each other. One had pancreatic cancer, which is known for its rapid progression. The other two aunts had different types of cancer, but the family is not discussing the details.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I do have 3 aunts that had turbo cancer from the COVID shot. They all died last year within months of each other. What kind of cancer? One had pancreatic cancer, which I know is a fast cancer anyway. It does spread very quickly. The other 2, I don't even know. The family won't even talk about it. These are my cousins, of course, but my aunt's children.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(23/57) JEREMIAH’S AUNT, NANCY ARCHER—“I think [it] took, from her last shot, approximately, 12 months to get to that point where medicine didn’t even think they had an answer [for her cancer].” In this Children’s Health Defense bus interview, we hear from Jeremiah, who describes how his aunt, Nancy Archer, died of turbo cancer following receipt of a Pfizer COVID injection. “It was heartbreaking to watch her succumb to turbo cancer from the effects of the shot,” Jeremiah says. He notes that she only took the injection because she wanted to ensure that she could travel freely between her homes in the U.S. and Guatemala. The timespan between Nancy’s receipt of her final Pfizer injection and her turbo cancer–caused death was approximately one year according to Jeremiah.

Video Transcript AI Summary
My aunt, Nancy Archer, was a loving massage therapist and healer who supported me through tough times. Despite her belief in natural medicine, she got the Pfizer vaccine due to fear of being stranded while living on a tight budget in Guatemala. After her second shot, she felt a lump in her abdomen but chose to treat it naturally instead of seeking medical help. Over time, her condition worsened, and the VA struggled to diagnose her, eventually revealing widespread cancer. She opted out of chemotherapy and spent her remaining months with family. Although she didn't want to discuss it, she acknowledged that the vaccine might have contributed to her illness.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Alright. We are live. Can you tell us your name, please? Speaker 1: My name is Jeremiah Blonde. Speaker 0: Alright. And this is a story about your aunt? Speaker 1: Yes. My my aunt, Nancy Archer, who was I was very close with. She had been there for me all my life and through my father's death and many other really trying times. And, she was a massage therapist and a healer. And, she healed me a lot and, just was there for me. And for so many people, she was loving, and it's, very into natural medicine and not going along with what the government has people do. But for some reason, she took the, Pfizer vaccine. Speaker 0: Why do you think that was if she was so into natural? What happened? Speaker 1: Well, she lived on a very tight social security budget. So she lived half the year in Guatemala, and she has a family there and people there. And, she was very afraid that she would be stranded somewhere. And, so she got the first shot and she's like, oh no more not doing that again. And then I think a month or 2 later she go she went ahead and got the second shot before she flew out to Guatemala. And so while she was in Guatemala she, started feeling like a lump in her gut and, like a hard sensation from the inside and out and, she, you know, wanted to treat it naturally whatever it was but she really didn't want to know so she didn't come back to the States and go to the doctor and, she basically wanted to heal naturally, meditation, those kinds of things and, she just started feeling worse and worse and felt the the lump getting bigger and bigger. And she, finally went through the VA and it took them a long time to make any kind of determination, but they were vacillating between ovarian cancer and mesentery cancer and, what is that? The appendix cancer. Just like and then eventually got to a point where they said, what? We don't we can't really help you. It's everywhere in your abdomen. And that was about I think that took from the her last shot approximately, 12 months to get to that point where, medicine didn't even think they had answer. So she chose to, go without chemo and, she lasted a few more months. We had a family reunion with her and she knew she was gonna go, but it was very hard to watch her. And, of course, I advised her many times not to get the shot and and it was heartbreaking to, watch her succumb to what I what I feel are super, sorry, terrible cancer from the effects of the shot. Speaker 0: Did she think that the shot gave her the cancer? Did she ever talk about it? Speaker 1: She didn't really wanna talk about it, but she knows that I I mean, I talked to her about it, but I was also trying to focus on and and helping her. But, yeah, I think she acknowledged she did acknowledge that it was most likely from the shot at one point.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(24/57) 2024 Study Published in Cureus Shows Significant Cancer Increase in Japan Following the Rollout of the COVID Injections in the Country Title: Increased Age-Adjusted Cancer Mortality After the Third mRNA-Lipid Nanoparticle Vaccine Dose During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Japan Authors: Miki Gibo, et al. Published: April 8, 2024 Journal: Cureus Key excerpts: “No significant excess mortality was observed during the first year of the pandemic (2020). However, some excess cancer mortalities were observed in 2021 after mass vaccination with the first and second vaccine doses, and significant excess mortalities were observed for all cancers and some specific types of cancer (including ovarian cancer, leukemia, prostate cancer, lip/oral/pharyngeal cancer, pancreatic cancer, and breast cancer) after mass vaccination with the third dose in 2022.” “In 2020, the first year of the pandemic, there was significant deficit mortality for all causes (< 99% lower PI) and no excess mortality for all cancers. However, in 2021, there was significant excess mortality of 2.1% (>99% upper PI) for all causes and 1.1% (>95% upper PI) for all cancers. In 2022, the excesses increased to 9.6% (>99% upper PI) for all causes and 2.1% (>99% upper PI) for all cancers. In 2022, the number of excess deaths was 115,799 (95%CI: 106,018, 125,501) for all causes and 7,162 (95%CI: 4,786, 9,522) for all cancers.” Link: https://www.proquest.com/openview/4513714a8a02ac4e05aed1faa662214c/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=2045583

Increased Age-Adjusted Cancer Mortality After the Third mRNA-Lipid Nanoparticle Vaccine Dose During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Japan - ProQuest Explore millions of resources from scholarly journals, books, newspapers, videos and more, on the ProQuest Platform. proquest.com

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(25/57) “Five case reports of 71, 40, 76, 55, and 75 years old with diagnoses of colon cancer, breast cancer, skin cancer, and gastric cancer in the last two patients respectively days and months after receiving the second, third and fourth doses of the COVID-19 vaccine.” Title: Which Could Be the Risk Factors for Developing Cancer After Receiving The COVID-19 Vaccine? Authors: Huang, W. L Published: January 28, 2023 Journal: International Journal of Cancer Research & Therapy Key Excerpts: “There are several articles in the literature after the COVID-19 pandemic showing the necessity of vaccinating people who have a cancer diagnosis to prevent this disease in this group of patients. But what I want to report in this article is that I am facing an increasing number of cases of patients with cancer after receiving COVID-19 vaccines and this is what I want to describe in this study, using the thoughts of Hippocrates (460 bce - 375 bce), the father of medicine, that said that ‘it is more important to consider other ancient medical traditions prior to the knowledge we have nowadays.’” “Five case reports of 71, 40, 76, 55, and 75 years old with diagnoses of colon cancer, breast cancer, skin cancer, and gastric cancer in the last two patients respectively days and months after receiving the second, third and fourth doses of the COVID-19 vaccine.” “The conclusion of this study is that patients that are developing cancer after receiving the COVID-19 vaccine have in common, energy deficiency inside the five internal massive organs (and these alterations are the factors to induce cancer formation according to traditional Chinese medicine) and the use of this kind of vaccine has the potential to reduce even more the vital energy of the patient which is already very low and leading to a weakness state of the immune system and increasing the chance to have any kind of chronic diseases, in this case, cancer.” Link: https://www.opastpublishers.com/open-access-articles/which-could-be-the-risk-factors-for-developing-cancer-after-receiving-the-covid19-vaccine.pdf

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(26/57) “We report on an aggressive, infiltrating, metastatic, and ultimately lethal basaloid type of carcinoma arising shortly after an mRNA vaccination for COVID-19…We propose that the vaccine can cause suppression of the immune system, which leads to accelerated cancer progression.” Title: Bell’s palsy or an aggressive infiltrating basaloid carcinoma post-mRNA vaccination for COVID-19? A case report and review of the literature Authors: Anthony M Kyriakopoulos, et al. Published: September 15, 2023 Journal: Journal of Experimental and Clinical Sciences Key Excerpts: “We report on an aggressive, infiltrating, metastatic, and ultimately lethal basaloid type of carcinoma arising shortly after an mRNA vaccination for COVID-19…We propose that the vaccine can cause suppression of the immune system, which leads to accelerated cancer progression.” “In this study we describe all aspects of this case and discuss possible causal links between the rapid emergence of this metastatic cancer and mRNA vaccination. We place this within the context of multiple immune impairments potentially related to the mRNA injections that would be expected to potentiate more aggressive presentation and progression of cancer. The type of malignancy we describe suggests a population risk for occurrence of a large variety of relatively common basaloid phenotype cancer cells, which may have the potential for metastatic disease.” Link: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10620857/

Bell’s palsy or an aggressive infiltrating basaloid carcinoma post-mRNA vaccination for COVID-19? A case report and review of the literature We report on an aggressive, infiltrating, metastatic, and ultimately lethal basaloid type of carcinoma arising shortly after an mRNA vaccination for COVID-19. The wife of the patient, since deceased, gave the consent for publishing the case. The ... pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(27/57) “Evidence is provided that adding 100 % of N1-methyl-pseudouridine (m1Ψ) to the mRNA vaccine in a melanoma model stimulated cancer growth and metastasis…Based on this compelling evidence, we suggest that future clinical trials for cancers or infectious diseases should not use mRNA vaccines with a 100 % m1Ψ modification, but rather ones with the lower percentage of m1Ψ modification to avoid immune suppression.” Title: Review: N1-methyl-pseudouridine (m1Ψ): Friend or foe of cancer? Authors: Alberto Rubio-Casillas, et al. Published: May 2024 Journal: International Journal of Biological Macromolecules Key Excerpts: “Evidence is provided that adding 100 % of N1-methyl-pseudouridine (m1Ψ) to the mRNA vaccine in a melanoma model stimulated cancer growth and metastasis…Based on this compelling evidence, we suggest that future clinical trials for cancers or infectious diseases should not use mRNA vaccines with a 100 % m1Ψ modification, but rather ones with the lower percentage of m1Ψ modification to avoid immune suppression.” Link: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0141813024022323

Review: N1-methyl-pseudouridine (m1Ψ): Friend or foe of cancer? Due to the health emergency created by SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes the COVID-19 disease, the rapid implementation of a new vaccine technology wa… sciencedirect.com

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(28/57) “Treg responses produced after mRNA vaccination and the subsequent mRNA-encoded SARS-CoV-2 spike protein expression may lead to a harmful influence on the immune system of vaccinees, and subsequent accelerated development of cancer and autoimmune disease.” Title: Oncogenesis and autoimmunity as a result of mRNA COVID-19 vaccination Authors: Anthony M Kyriakopoulos, et al. Published: April 23, 2024 Journal: TechRxiv PREPRINT Key Excerpts: “In summary, the Treg responses produced after mRNA vaccination and the subsequent mRNA-encoded SARS-CoV-2 spike protein expression may lead to a harmful influence on the immune system of vaccinees, and subsequent accelerated development of cancer and autoimmune disease. These mechanisms are consistent with both epidemiological findings and case reports.” Link: https://www.techrxiv.org/doi/full/10.22541/au.171387387.73158754

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(29/57) “In this report, a rare case of primary cutaneous adenoid cystic carcinoma (PCACC) localized in the subcutaneous tissue of the scapular region that grew after BNT162b2 corona virus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination…The BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine has been associated with a multisystem inflammatory syndrome (MIS-V). A comparable immune reaction could potentially enhance tumor growth rate.” Title: Primary Cutaneous Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma in a Rare Location With an Immune Response to a BNT162b2 Vaccine Authors: Yilmaz, Abdurrahman, et al. Published: April–June 2024 Journal: JBJS Case Connector Key Excerpts: “In this report, a rare case of primary cutaneous adenoid cystic carcinoma (PCACC) localized in the subcutaneous tissue of the scapular region that grew after BNT162b2 corona virus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination is presented and may be explained by CD4 and CD8 cell infiltration. The BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine has been associated with a multisystem inflammatory syndrome (MIS-V). A comparable immune reaction could potentially enhance tumor growth rate.” Link: https://journals.lww.com/jbjscc/abstract/2024/06000/primary_cutaneous_adenoid_cystic_carcinoma_in_a.7.aspx

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(30/57) “mRNA vaccine boosters may impair immune system response in immune compromised individuals. Multiple doses of the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines may result in much higher levels of IgG 4 antibodies, or also impaired activation of CD4 + and CD8 + T cells.” Title: mRNA vaccine boosters and impaired immune system response in immune compromised individuals: a narrative review Authors: Alberto Boretti Published: January 27, 2024 Journal: Clinical and Experimental Medicine Key Excerpts: “mRNA vaccine boosters may impair immune system response in immune compromised individuals. Multiple doses of the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines may result in much higher levels of IgG 4 antibodies, or also impaired activation of CD4 + and CD8 + T cells.” Link: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10238-023-01264-1

mRNA vaccine boosters and impaired immune system response in immune compromised individuals: a narrative review - Clinical and Experimental Medicine Over the last 24 months, there has been growing evidence of a correlation between mRNA COVID-19 vaccine boosters and increased prevalence of COVID link.springer.com

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(31/57) “The mRNA vaccines potentially cause increased risk to infectious diseases and cancer.” Title: Innate immune suppression by SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccinations: The role of G-quadruplexes, exosomes, and MicroRNAs Authors: Stephanie Seneff, et al. Published: June 2022 Journal: Food and Chemical Toxicology Key Excerpts: “The mRNA vaccines potentially cause increased risk to infectious diseases and cancer.” “In this paper, we present evidence that vaccination induces a profound impairment in type I interferon signaling, which has diverse adverse consequences to human health. Immune cells that have taken up the vaccine nanoparticles release into circulation large numbers of exosomes containing spike protein along with critical microRNAs that induce a signaling response in recipient cells at distant sites. We also identify potential profound disturbances in regulatory control of protein synthesis and cancer surveillance.” “These vaccinations have now been shown to downregulate critical pathways related to cancer surveillance, infection control, and cellular homeostasis.” Link: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027869152200206X

ScienceDirectScienceDirect sciencedirect.com

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(32/57) “In this report we describe the case of a healthy, young, athletic woman who developed acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL)/lymphoblastic lymphoma (LBL) after receiving the second dose of the Pfizer/BioNTech modified mRNA (modRNA) COVID-19 genetic vaccine (marketed as Comirnaty)” Title: A Case Report of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia (ALL)/Lymphoblastic Lymphoma (LBL) Following the Second Dose of Comirnaty: An Analysis of the Potential Pathogenic Mechanism Based on of the Existing Literature Authors: Patrizia Gentilini, et al. Published: Posted April 1, 2024 Journal: PREPRINT Key Excerpts: “In this report we describe the case of a healthy, young, athletic woman who developed acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL)/lymphoblastic lymphoma (LBL) after receiving the second dose of the Pfizer/BioNTech modified mRNA (modRNA) COVID-19 genetic vaccine (marketed as Comirnaty)” “A time interval of 16 weeks from the second vaccination to the diagnosis of cancer was noted.” Link: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Panagis-Polykretis/publication/379538444_A_Case_Report_of_Acute_Lymphoblastic_Leukaemia_ALLLymphoblastic_Lymphoma_LBL_Following_the_Second_Dose_of_ComirnatyR_An_Analysis_of_the_Potential_Pathogenic_Mechanism_Based_on_of_the_Existing_Literatu/links/6615050439e7641c0ba6c7f8/A-Case-Report-of-Acute-Lymphoblastic-Leukaemia-ALL-Lymphoblastic-Lymphoma-LBL-Following-the-Second-Dose-of-ComirnatyR-An-Analysis-of-the-Potential-Pathogenic-Mechanism-Based-on-of-the-Existing-Literat.pdf

ResearchGate - Temporarily Unavailable researchgate.net

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(33/57) “We report a case of neuropsychiatric symptoms and refractory HLH in a woman with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) after receiving her COVID-19 vaccine treated with belimumab, later found to have intravascular large B-cell lymphoma (IVLBCL) at autopsy.” Title: Fatal hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis with intravascular large B-cell lymphoma following coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination in a patient with systemic lupus erythematosus: an intertwined case Authors: Yusuke Ueda, et al. Published: November 6, 2023 Journal: Immunological Medicine Key Excerpts: “We report a case of neuropsychiatric symptoms and refractory HLH in a woman with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) after receiving her COVID-19 vaccine treated with belimumab, later found to have intravascular large B-cell lymphoma (IVLBCL) at autopsy.” Link: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/25785826.2024.2338594

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(34/57) “After reviewing the available literature, we are particularly concerned that certain COVID-19 vaccines may generate a pro-tumorigenic milieu (i.e., a specific environment that could lead to neoplastic transformation) that predisposes some (stable) oncologic patients and survivors to cancer progression, recurrence, and/or metastasis.” Title: SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination and the Multi-Hit Hypothesis of Oncogenesis Authors: Raquel Valdes Angues, et al. Published: December 17, 2023 Journal: Cureus Key Excerpts: “After reviewing the available literature, we are particularly concerned that certain COVID-19 vaccines may generate a pro-tumorigenic milieu (i.e., a specific environment that could lead to neoplastic transformation) that predisposes some (stable) oncologic patients and survivors to cancer progression, recurrence, and/or metastasis.” Link: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10792266/

SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination and the Multi-Hit Hypothesis of Oncogenesis Cancer is a complex and dynamic disease. The “hallmarks of cancer” were proposed by Hanahan and Weinberg (2000) as a group of biological competencies that human cells attain as they progress from normalcy to neoplastic transformation. These ... pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(35/57) “We present a rare case of metastatic prostate cancer diagnosed after initially presenting as generalized lymphadenopathy following a coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID) booster vaccination.” Title: Metastatic prostatic adenocarcinoma presenting as generalized lymphadenopathy unmasked by a COVID booster vaccine Authors: Kavya Bharathidasan, et al. Published: November 28, 2023 Journal: Clinical Case Reports Key Excerpts: “We present a rare case of metastatic prostate cancer diagnosed after initially presenting as generalized lymphadenopathy following a coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID) booster vaccination.” Link: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/ccr3.8278

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(36/57) “Our results raise grave concerns regarding the safety of the BNT162b2 vaccine and call for an immediate halt of all RNA biologicals unless these concerns can be dispelled.” Title: BioNTech RNA-Based COVID-19 Injections Contain Large Amounts Of Residual DNA Including An SV40 Promoter/Enhancer Sequence Authors: Ulrike Kämmerer, et al. Published: December 3, 2024 Journal: Science, Public Health Policy and the Law Key Excerpts: “We further analyzed RNA and DNA contents of these vials and identified large amounts of DNA after RNase A digestion in all lots with concentrations ranging from 32.7 ng to 43.4 ng per clinical dose. This far exceeds the maximal acceptable concentration of 10 ng per clinical dose that has been set by international regulatory authorities.” “Our results raise grave concerns regarding the safety of the BNT162b2 vaccine and call for an immediate halt of all RNA biologicals unless these concerns can be dispelled.” Link: https://publichealthpolicyjournal.com/biontech-rna-based-covid-19-injections-contain-large-amounts-of-residual-dna-including-an-sv40-promoter-enhancer-sequence/

BioNTech RNA-Based COVID-19 Injections Contain Large Amounts Of Residual DNA Including An SV40 Promoter/Enhancer Sequence - Science, Public Health Policy and the Law Background: BNT162b2 RNA-based COVID-19 injections are specified to transfect human cells to efficiently produce spike proteins for an immune response. publichealthpolicyjournal.com

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(37/57) “These data demonstrate the presence of billions to hundreds of billions of DNA molecules per dose in these vaccines. Using fluorometry, all vaccines exceed the guidelines for residual DNA set by FDA and WHO of 10 ng/dose by 188 – 509-fold.” Title: DNA fragments detected in monovalent and bivalent 2 Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna modRNA COVID-19 vaccines from Ontario, Canada: Exploratory dose response relationship with serious adverse events Authors: David J. Speicher, et al. Journal: PREPRINT Key Excerpts: “These data demonstrate the presence of billions to hundreds of billions of DNA molecules per dose in these vaccines. Using fluorometry, all vaccines exceed the guidelines for residual DNA set by FDA and WHO of 10 ng/dose by 188 – 509-fold…Our findings extend existing concerns about vaccine safety and call into question the relevance of guidelines conceived before the introduction of efficient transfection using LNPs.” Link: https://osf.io/preprints/osf/mjc97

DNA fragments detected in monovalent and bivalent Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna modRNA COVID-19 vaccines from Ontario, Canada: Exploratory dose response relationship with serious adverse events. Background: In vitro transcription (IVT) reactions used to generate nucleoside modified RNA (modRNA) for SARS-CoV-2 vaccines currently rely on an RNA polymerase transcribing from a DNA template. Production of modRNA used in the original Pfizer randomized clinical trial (RCT) utilized a PCR-generated DNA template (Process 1). To generate billions of vaccine doses, this DNA was cloned into a bacterial plasmid vector for amplification in Escherichia coli before linearization (Process 2), expanding the size and complexity of potential residual DNA and introducing sequences not present in the Process 1 template. It appears that Moderna used a similar plasmid-based process for both clinical trial and post-trial use vaccines. Recently, DNA sequencing studies have revealed this plasmid DNA at significant levels in both Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna modRNA vaccines. These studies surveyed a limited number of lots and questions remain regarding the variance in residual DNA observed internationally. Methods: Using previously published primer and probe sequences, quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) and Qubit® fluorometry was performed on an additional 27 mRNA vials obtained in Canada and drawn from 12 unique lots (5 lots of Moderna child/adult monovalent, 1 lot of Moderna adult bivalent BA.4/5, 1 lot of Moderna child/adult bivalent BA.1, 1 lot of Moderna XBB.1.5 monovalent, 3 lots of Pfizer adult monovalent, and 1 lot of Pfizer adult bivalent BA.4/5). The Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) database was queried for the number and categorization of adverse events (AEs) reported for each of the lots tested. The content of one previously studied vial of Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine was examined by Oxford Nanopore sequencing to determine the size distribution of DNA fragments. This sample was also used to determine if the residual DNA is packaged in the lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) and thus resistant to DNaseI or if the DNA resides outside of the LNP and is DNaseI labile.  Results: Quantification cycle (Cq) values (1:10 dilution) for the plasmid origin of replication (ori) and spike sequences ranged from 18.44 - 24.87 and 18.03 - 23.83 and for Pfizer, and 22.52 – 24.53 and 25.24 – 30.10 for Moderna, respectively. These values correspond to 0.28 – 4.27 ng/dose and 0.22 - 2.43 ng/dose (Pfizer), and 0.01 -0.34 ng/dose and 0.25 – 0.78 ng/dose (Moderna), for ori and spike respectively measured by qPCR, and 1,896 – 3,720 ng/dose and 3,270 – 5,100 ng/dose measured by Qubit® fluorometry for Pfizer and Moderna, respectfully. The SV40 promoter-enhancer-ori was only detected in Pfizer vials with Cq scores ranging from 16.64 – 22.59. In an exploratory analysis, we found preliminary evidence of a dose response relationship of the amount of DNA per dose and the frequency of serious adverse events (SAEs). This relationship was different for the Pfizer and Moderna products. Size distribution analysis found mean and maximum DNA fragment lengths of 214 base pairs (bp) and 3.5 kb, respectively. The plasmid DNA is likely inside the LNPs and is protected from nucleases. Conclusion: These data demonstrate the presence of billions to hundreds of billions of DNA molecules per dose in these vaccines. Using fluorometry, all vaccines exceed the guidelines for residual DNA set by FDA and WHO of 10 ng/dose by 188 – 509-fold. However, qPCR residual DNA content in all vaccines were below these guidelines emphasizing the importance of methodological clarity and consistency when interpreting quantitative guidelines. The preliminary evidence of a dose-response effect of residual DNA measured with qPCR and SAEs warrant confirmation and further investigation. Our findings extend existing concerns about vaccine safety and call into question the relevance of guidelines conceived before the introduction of efficient transfection using LNPs. With several obvious limitations, we urge that our work is replicated under forensic conditions and that guidelines be revised to account for highly efficient DNA transfection and cumulative dosing. osf.io

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(38/57) “We conclude that the SV40 origin of replication and early control region are sufficient viral components for the genomic instability at sites of SV40 integration and that SV40 T Ag is not required.” Title: The genomic instability associated with integrated simian virus 40 DNA is dependent on the origin of replication and early control region Authors: D J Hunter, et al. Published: February 1, 1994 Journal: Journal of Virology Key Excerpts: “We conclude that the SV40 origin of replication and early control region are sufficient viral components for the genomic instability at sites of SV40 integration and that SV40 T Ag is not required.” Link: https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/jvi.68.2.787-796.1994?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori%3Arid%3Acrossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub++0pubmed

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(39/57) “Residual DNA might be a risk to your final product because of oncogenic and/or infectivity potential. There are several potential mechanisms by which residual DNA could be oncogenic, including the integration and expression of encoded oncogenes or insertional mutagenesis following DNA integration.” Title: Guidance for Industry Characterization and Qualification of Cell Substrates and Other Biological Materials Used in the Production of Viral Vaccines for Infectious Disease Indications Authors: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Key Excerpts: “Residual DNA might be a risk to your final product because of oncogenic and/or infectivity potential. There are several potential mechanisms by which residual DNA could be oncogenic, including the integration and expression of encoded oncogenes or insertional mutagenesis following DNA integration.” Link: https://www.fda.gov/media/78428/download

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(40/57) SENIOR RESEARCH SCIENTIST STEPHANIE SENEFF—"Ninety-eight percent [98%] of the mentions of cancer [in VAERS in 2021] were COVID vaccines...This is just very striking to me that cancer is something that these vaccines cause that other vaccines don't cause..." To start the VAERS portion of this turbo-cancer mega thread, we have senior research scientist at MIT Stephanie Seneff describing for Dr. William Makis, Zen Honeycutt, et al. how the COVID injections are heavily associated with various cancers according to numerous reports in VAERS. "Ninety-eight percent [98%] of the mentions of cancer [in VAERS in 2021] were COVID vaccines," Seneff says. "It's hugely more highly represented than the number of COVID vaccines that were received in that year, so it's way out of line with the other [non-COVID] vaccines." "This is just very striking to me that cancer is something that these vaccines cause that other vaccines don't cause," Seneff adds. She notes that for VAERS reports of cancer regarding flu jabs, there are "practically none," which means the ratio of how often the COVID injections cause cancer versus flu jabs is "infinity." As for mechanism of action, Seneff highlights one paper describing PD-L1 overexpression as a result of the COVID injections, which, in turn, can increase one's odds of developing cancer. (PD-L1, Seneff notes, is a "molecule that's produced by both cancer cells and immune cells" that "prevents... immune cells from responding to both the... COVID virus, but also to cancer.") Seneff notes that the paper shows a "dramatic difference" in overexpression of PD-L1 in the control group versus the group recently injected with the COVID jabs, with the latter group showing far more of it.

Video Transcript AI Summary
VAERS, the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, collects data on vaccine-related adverse events. Analysis shows that in 2021, 98% of cancer-related reports were linked to COVID vaccines, significantly higher than other vaccines. A comparison with the flu vaccine revealed virtually no cancer cases associated with it, highlighting a stark contrast. Research indicates that PD L1, a receptor produced by cancer and immune cells, may contribute to this issue. Elevated PD L1 levels were observed two days after vaccination, suggesting an activated immune system may suppress responses to both COVID and cancer. This nonspecific immunosuppressive effect raises concerns about the potential for increased cancer risk following vaccination.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Couple of examples here of data from the VAERS. VAERS is this database that the US government maintains. And I have spent a lot of time looking through VAERS. We did a lot of analysis. Speaker 1: Just one minute for people who don't know what VAERS is. It's the vaccine adverse event reporting system that has been set up by the CDC that doctors and patients can report, vaccine adverse events, for afterwards. Yeah. Speaker 0: And it's a very valuable database for looking at what's going on with the different vaccines. And so, in this same paper, food and chemical toxicology, we have a lot of data on various numbers on the counts of occurrences of different things with the COVID vaccines compared to all the other vaccines that were delivered in 2021. And the numbers are just astonishing because these are different words that are related to cancer, cancer lymphoma, leukemia, metastasis, carcinoma, neoplasm. So, we could look at the counts in the various database for that year, which was when the vaccine was introduced, for all the COVID vaccines and then for all vaccines altogether. And you can see that almost all of the cases, you know, 98% of the mentions of cancer were COVID vaccines. It's hugely highly more highly represented than the number of COVID vaccines that were received in that year. So it's way out of line with the other vaccines. And this is something that I found on the web. There's another analysis of, again, the same database. They compared the COVID vaccine to the flu vaccine. So this is the COVID vaccine, this is the flu vaccine, the counts for these 2 different vaccines normalized by the total number of vaccines administered. And for neoplasm, breast cancer, lymphoma, lung cancer, prostate cancer, brain neoplasms. All these different conditions, you can see the numbers here for COVID, there's practically none for the flu vaccine. So in many cases, the ratio is infinity. So this is just very striking to me that that cancer is something that these vaccines cause that other vaccines don't cause. And now you can see some of the evidence of why that might be. And this was a very interesting paper to me about this PD L1, overexpression of PD L1. That is a very dangerous thing to have because that is going to link to cancer. And so this was measured 2 days after the 2nd vaccine. So they'd had their 2 vaccine series. And a quote from the paper, an activated immune system needs to be regulated to avoid autoimmune collateral damage. And that's what's going on. There's such an intense reaction that the immune system cuts back and it tries to stop it by elevating this PD L1. You can see here's the control data and this is the, the vaccine recipient. Speaker 1: Stephanie, can you just tell us a little bit what is PD L1? Speaker 0: Yeah. Yeah. I will get to that in a moment, but it is a particular, receptor. It's a molecule that's produced by both cancer cells and immune cells. And it basically, just like IgG4 in a way, gets in the way. It blocks, the immune cells. It says stand down. It prevents the immune cells from responding to both the virus, the COVID virus, but also to cancer. So it can cause again, a dangerous increase in the potential of having cancer. And you can see this dramatic difference between the controls and the people 2 days after the vaccine. Vaccinations may have a nonspecific immunosuppressive effect lasting for a certain period of time. This is a quote from this paper. So they're concerned about this nonspecific, meaning that it could suppress the immune system response to cancer.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(41/57) VAERS ID 1220913: “HUSBAND DIED BECAUSE OF TERMINAL PANCREATIC CANCER.” (One dose of Moderna’s COVID injection.) https://t.co/e0iryfdfLg

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(42/57) VAERS ID 2184304: “HE HAD 2 LUMBAR SPINE X-RAYS ON OR ABOUT JULY 16, 2021, WHICH SHOWED LESIONS ON HIS SPINE…FROM THAT POINT ON I WATCHED THE TUMORS APPEAR ON HIS BODY AND HEAD. HE DIED 9/7/2021.” (Two doses of Moderna’s COVID injection.) https://t.co/t0ZBbVpa7k

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(43/57) VAERS ID 2785362: “TURBO CANCER RAPIDLY SPREAD THROUGHOUT HER BODY, EVENTUALLY WINDING UP IN HER SPINE AND BRAIN…TAKING HER LIFE.” (Three doses of Moderna’s COVID injection.) https://t.co/haWd0l5sfX

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(44/57) VAERS ID 1037833: “SHE [WAS] INFORMED THAT 3 DAYS AFTER THE SHOT, SHE HAD [A] CT WITH CONTRAST FOR STAGE 1 LUNG CANCER.” (One Pfizer COVID injection.) https://t.co/33rfHuGu3O

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(45/57) VAERS ID 1248298: “PATIENT PRESENTS TO EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT ONE DAY AFTER VACCINATION…FOUND TO HAVE WIDELY METASTATIC...CANCER INVOLVING CHEST, ABDOMEN, AND PELVIS.” (Two Moderna COVID injections.) https://t.co/uOZEvqujz3

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(46/57) VAERS ID 1290185: “PATIENT STATES THAT WITHIN 2 WEEKS OF THE FIRST VACCINE SHE NOTICED BREAST SWELLING, NIPPLE INVERSION AND TENDER AXILA OF THE RIGHT BREAST…[SHE NOW HAS] INVASIVE BREAST CARCINOMA.” https://t.co/zPtBA8zDXq

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(47/57) SYMPTOMS TEXT SEARCH: CARCINOMA; TOTAL NUMBER OF REPORTS: 923 Note that in the context of the COVID injections, searching a single cancer-related term like “carcinoma” turns up more than 900 reports. Also note that VAERS reports are only a small fraction of the true number of adverse-event cases. According to one study performed by Harvard Pilgrim Health Care, Inc. in 2011, it is estimated that VAERS is underreported by a factor of 100 or more. Source: https://digital.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/docs/publication/r18hs017045-lazarus-final-report-2011.pdf

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(48/57) “I HAVE A FAMILY MEMBER WHO WAS IMMUNO-COMPROMISED, FORCED TO TAKE [THE] VACCINE TO KEEP [THEIR] JOB, [AND] NOW HAS TURBO CANCER & [IS] FIGHTING FOR [THEIR] LIFE.” https://t.co/Q8Qzyg4DFa

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(49/57) “MY EX TOOK IT...HE DIED 9 MONTHS LATER WITH TURBO CANCER.” https://t.co/TVMaGjcENk

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(50/57) “MY WIFE HAD HER BREAST CANCER IN CHECK BUT WAS MANDATED TO TAKE THE COVID SHOT [WHEN] SHE WAS A SCHOOL TEACHER. TURBO CANCER AND GONE IN 5 WEEKS.” https://t.co/EN9DlNUn51

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(51/57) “I LOST MY BELOVED MOTHER TO METASTATIC CANCER (SARCOMA KIDNEYS AND LUNGS) IN AUG [20]23. SHE DECLINED AFTER HER 5TH VACCINE (MODERNA) IN SEPT [20]22.” https://t.co/U2j0M8H6ja

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(52/57) “MY MUM WAS A HEALTHY, INDEPENDENT, OUT-EVERYDAY WOMAN UNTIL SHE GOT THE SHOT. 2 DAYS LATER SHE HAD BLEEDING BEHIND HER EYES, A FEW MONTHS AFTER THAT, DIAGNOSED WITH LUNG AND BRAIN CANCER…3 DAYS AFTER DIAGNOSIS PASSED AWAY.” https://t.co/8DtdEnuuoX

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(53/57) “I’VE LOST 5 OF MY FRIENDS (45-55 ALL VAXXED) ALL HAD WHAT I’D DESCRIBE AS TURBO CANCERS THAT SPREAD TOO QUICKLY FOR TREATMENT IN SOME CASES.” https://t.co/akzGIRHMJI

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(54/57) “MY [MOTHER IN LAW] WAS DIAGNOSED WITH BRAIN CANCER THIS PAST APRIL, THEY DID OPERATE, BUT 8 [WEEKS] LATER, SHE DIED. SHE WAS [VACCINATED] AT LEAST TWICE THAT WE KNOW OF.” https://t.co/tBT856ql5Z

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(55/57) “I HAVE A 47 YEAR OLD FRIEND WHO DIED THIS WEEK. TURBO CANCER. VAX AND BOOSTED. BRAIN TUMORS AND STAGE 4 COLON CANCER IN A MATTER OF MONTHS. DIED A YEAR LATER.” https://t.co/BLWLdls5oy

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(56/57) “MY DAD PASSED AWAY IN MAY FROM TURBO CANCER! HE WAS DIAGNOSED IN SEPTEMBER OF 2023, 8 MONTHS LATER HE DIED. HE WAS EXTREMELY HEALTHY, AND IN EXCELLENT SHAPE. HE TOOK 2 SHOTS WITHOUT MY KNOWLEDGE…” https://t.co/0kJ587txVP

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(57/57) “LOST MY FRIEND IN FEBRUARY TO A TURBO CANCER. SHE WENT FROM NO CANCER TO BONE CANCER AND STOMACH CANCER TO DEAD IN SEVERAL MONTHS. HER FAMILY PRESSURED HER TO TAKE THE SHOTS.” https://t.co/cQ66egypct

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(ADDENDUM TWEET 1) “You know, if you just read the pamphlet that comes with the COVID-19 vaccines, it says COMIRNATY has not been evaluated for…carcinogenicity…[Meaning] It hasn't been tested to see if it causes cancer.” In this clip, EMT and whistleblower Harry Fisher shows us the package insert that comes with the COMIRNATY injection (i.e. Pfizer’s ostensibly FDA approved COVID injection). He notes that the insert says that the injection has not been tested for potential carcinogenicity. Fisher notes that this means that “it hasn’t been tested to see if it causes cancer.” “They're constantly telling us it [the COVID injection] can't cause cancer, and they haven't even studied to see if it can,” Fisher adds. “They write it right there in the pamphlet.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
The COVID-19 vaccine pamphlet states that comorbidity has not been evaluated for potential causes of carcinogenicity, genotoxicity, or male fertility impairment. It specifically mentions that carcinogenicity has not been tested, meaning there's no evidence to confirm whether it can cause cancer. Genotoxicity refers to the potential for a substance to damage genetic information, which could lead to mutations and cancer. Despite claims that the vaccine cannot cause cancer, the lack of studies on this aspect is noted in the pamphlet. Additionally, concerns about male fertility are raised.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You know, if you just read the pamphlet that comes with the COVID 19 vaccines, it says, comorbidity has not been evaluated for the potential cause, carcinogenicity, genotoxicity, or the impairment of male fertility. Carcinogenicity, it hasn't been tested to see if it causes cancer. And genotoxicity, the ability of a chemical, physical, or biological agent to damage a cell's genetic information, which can lead to mutations and potential cancer. They're constantly telling us it can't cause cancer, and they haven't even studied to see if it can. They write it right there in the pamphlet. And then there's the male fertility part. God bless.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(ADDENDUM TWEET 2) PLEASE ADD YOUR OWN PERSONAL TURBO-CANCER STORY TO THIS THREAD. For me: My first cousin once removed died of turbo cancer at the age of 40 and left behind one young son. Also: my uncle was diagnosed with skin cancer following his injection; my former barber was diagnosed with prostate cancer following his injection; my best friend’s father was diagnosed with colon cancer following his injection.

Saved - February 3, 2025 at 5:47 PM

@BGatesIsaPyscho - Concerned Citizen

“I was fired after 31 years - for saying people with natural immunity didn’t need an experimental Covid Vaccine” “The Covid shots have caused damage than anything else in history - because the Toxic Spike Protein ends up EVERYWHERE in your body” https://t.co/znuYWQzaLC

Video Transcript AI Summary
I was fired after 31 years as an emergency room physician without any patient complaints. My dismissal was due to my belief that individuals with natural immunity did not need vaccination. While I lost over 50% of my income and can no longer work in the emergency room, I still maintain my private practice. I discovered that Pfizer's biodistribution studies revealed the vaccines spread throughout the body, not just remaining in the arm. The messenger RNA from the vaccines affects various organs, including the brain, lungs, heart, liver, reproductive organs, and bone marrow. This widespread distribution is why the COVID vaccines have resulted in a broader range of side effects than any other medical treatment in history.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I was fired after 31 years as an emergency room physician with not one single patient complaint against me in those 31 years. I was fired for saying that somebody who had natural immunity didn't need to be vaccinated against a disease to which they were already immune. Fortunately, I still have my medical license even though I lost a significant part at least 50% of my income and I couldn't work as an emergency room doctor anymore. I still have my private practice. So when I discovered from the, the biodistribution studies that Pfizer had hidden, that we knew that these vaccines go around your entire body, they do not just stay in your arm, Pfizer's biodistribution studies on the lipid nanoparticles show that they literally take those messenger RNA strands into every part of your body that go into your brain and your lungs and your heart and your liver and your reproductive organs and your bone marrow and everywhere, which is, by the way, why these COVID shots have caused a greater array of side effects than any other medical treatment in history because this toxic spike protein ends up in literally every every part of your body
Saved - February 6, 2025 at 11:17 PM

@laralogan - Lara Logan

This confirms that they knew all along they were hurting people & they pushed the shots anyway. Criminal.

@CartlandDavid - Dr David Cartland BMedSci MBChB MRCGP (2014)

This is mind blowing! Pfizer whistleblower releases internal documents showing they had received over 158,000 adverse reaction reports within 2 months of it's release. https://t.co/RE2QeM5cLM

Saved - June 6, 2025 at 1:32 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared a troubling incident where a patient just off a ventilator received an mRNA COVID vaccine, only to die days later. Following this, there was a verbal order to erase the vaccination from the medical record. This is a clear violation of medical ethics, as every doctor understands that critically ill patients should not be vaccinated. Despite the documentation of these events, no one has been held accountable for this situation in Canada.

@toobaffled - “Sudden And Unexpected”

A COVID shot given to a patient just off a ventilator — then an order to erase it from the record. 💉 Four days after surviving critical illness, an ICU patient was injected with mRNA. Days later, they died. Then came a verbal order to remove the vaccine from the chart. This wasn’t speculation. It was documented. Every doctor knows: 🚫 Never vaccinate the critically ill Yet it happened in Canada. No one was held accountable. - National Citizens Enquiry - https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1KTW2XtuCU/?

Video Transcript AI Summary
Four days after ordering a deadly injection, Dr. Picchu allegedly ordered the removal of the COVID-19 vaccination record from the patient's medical file. The speaker claims any doctor would know not to vaccinate an ill patient, especially one recently off a ventilator. The head of the ICU ordered an mRNA injection for COVID-19 for a patient less than a week removed from a mechanical ventilator. The patient died later that week. The speaker states that Dr. Picho, head of the ICU in British Columbia, still has his medical license.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Four days after ordering this deadly injection, the doctor, Doctor. Picchu, makes a verbal order to the nurse to remove COVID-nineteen vaccination from the medication record. Unless I had seen this medical record with my own eyes, I would not believe that any doctor would be so criminal as to try and forge and remove a medical record that showed evidence of deliberate harm to a patient who just recovered from a ventilator. Every family doctor, every medical student even knows, you never give any vaccination while a patient is still ill. This patient was less than a week off of a mechanical ventilator and the head of ICU orders an mRNA injection for COVID-nineteen. Later that week the patient died. As far as I know Doctor. Picho in British Columbia, head of the ICU still has his British Columbia medical license.
Error facebook.com
Saved - June 14, 2025 at 8:41 AM

@liz_churchill10 - Liz Churchill

Horrific. “73.9% of deaths after the ‘Covid Vaccine’ are due to the shot. The IMMEDIATE withdrawal of the ‘Vaccine’ is essential to prevent further loss of life. The continued administration of these products now constitutes MASS NEGLIGENT HOMICIDE…” https://t.co/ARz1g7sUqI

Video Transcript AI Summary
The McCullough Foundation has conducted over 20 scientific studies exposing the harms of COVID-19 shots. A systematic review of autopsy findings proved a causal link between mRNA shots and death, so Brazil is putting kids at risk. A study found a 37% life expectancy reduction in those who received two or more doses. The largest COVID-19 vaccine safety study ever conducted, with 99 million people, found a 500% increased risk of myocarditis and a 200-300% increased risk of spinal cord inflammation, as well as Guillain Barre syndrome. A study of 85 million people found a 300% increased risk of heart attacks, strokes, arrhythmias, and coronary artery disease. Another study showed people with strokes who got mRNA shots are producing spike protein in their cerebral arteries for up to 17 months. People are producing spike in their vital organs, reducing their life expectancy, risking death and cardiovascular damage, and it's dangerous to give these to children.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: At the McCullough Foundation, we have conducted over 20 scientific studies all published in the peer reviewed literature now, exposing the harms of these shots. And, I I I'll I'll go over some of the most glaring ones. And so, one of our studies, a systematic review of autopsy findings and deaths after COVID nineteen vaccination, actually proved a causal link between these mRNA shots and death. And so what Brazil's doing, they're putting these kids at risk of death. A study by Alessandro and colleagues found a thirty seven percent life expectancy reduction in those who received two or more doses. And so they're reducing the life expectancy of these kids, and it's just an absolute disaster. We now know few recent studies that are absolutely shocking that we are so we have the and we have the largest COVID nineteen vaccine safety studies ever conducted. The one, ninety nine million people in it. They found, five hundred percent increased risks of myocarditis, about two hundred, three hundred percent increased risks of spinal cord inflammation. And then we have Guillain Barre syndrome in that study. So that just that study proved it wasn't safe for human use. And then we have last week, the largest study with eighty five million people, and it just came out. They found three hundred percent increased risks, heart attacks, strokes, arrhythmias, and coronary artery disease. And then we had another study last week that came out that showed people with strokes who got mRNA shots are producing spike protein in their cerebral arteries, so in their brains, for up to seventeen months. Or that's at least how long it looked. And so we have people now producing spike in their vital organs, reducing their life expectancy, risking death, risking cardiovascular damage, and it's absolutely dangerous. It's absolutely terrible that they're giving these to children.
Saved - October 27, 2025 at 3:42 PM

@redpilldispensr - Red Pill Dispenser

"One vaccinator, in one day, vaccinated 99 people." "Within a year, 36 of them were dead." "And there are hundreds and hundreds of instances like that." https://t.co/kAnmsiclEx

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker recounts an evolution in perspective: they were on board at the beginning, a stance they say cannot be disputed by others. However, they state that data revealed an issue that “shouldn’t be happening” and describe it in terms of excess deaths. The speaker insists that the data shows a stark pattern across vaccination events, detailing a specific anecdote: “one vaccinated on one day vaccinated ninety nine people. And within a year, thirty six of them were dead.” They quantify the improbability of this outcome with the claim that it represents “one point eight trillion to one against.” The speaker emphasizes that this is not an isolated occurrence but is part of a larger set of similar instances. They assert that “there are hundreds and hundreds of instances like that all over New Zealand,” underscoring the breadth of the pattern they perceive in the data. In summation, the speaker insists that the observed excess deaths following vaccination ought to be unacceptable, stating simply: “That should never happen. The odds.” The overall message centers on a perceived discrepancy between initial support for vaccination and the data-driven claim of extraordinary rates of death among those vaccinated, expressed through a highly improbable odds figure and a claim of widespread, recurring examples across New Zealand.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And you noticed the ninety one what was it? The I was all on board at the beginning, and that's something that they cannot dispute. But I saw something in the data based on my experience that shouldn't be happening, and that was the excess deaths which you're referring to. One vaccinated on one day vaccinated ninety nine people. And within a year, thirty six of them were dead, and that is one point eight trillion to one against. That should never happen. The odds. Yeah. And there are hundreds and hundreds of instances like that all over New Zealand. That's what I've to judge. One of them.
Saved - October 28, 2025 at 11:14 PM

@DiedSuddenly_ - Died Suddenly

This is completely shocking… "One vaccinator, in one day, vaccinated 99 people." "Within a year, 36 of them were dead." "And there are hundreds and hundreds of instances like that." https://t.co/pqCMSdEEY9

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker says they were on board at the beginning, but based on their data and experience, excess deaths are occurring. They reference “one vaccinated on one day vaccinated ninety nine people,” and state that “within a year, thirty six of them were dead,” adding that this is “one point eight trillion to one against.” They assert, “That should never happen. The odds.” The speaker notes there are “hundreds and hundreds of instances like that,” across New Zealand. They claim this is “what got the church. One of them.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And you noticed the ninety one what was it? The Yeah. I was all on board at the beginning, and that's something that they cannot dispute. But I saw something in the data based on my experience that shouldn't be happening, and that was the excess deaths which you're referring to. One vaccinated on one day vaccinated ninety nine people. And within a year, thirty six of them were dead, and that is one point eight trillion to one against. That should never happen. The odds. And there are yeah. And there are hundreds and hundreds of instances like that. All over New Zealand. That's what got the church. One of them.
Saved - March 5, 2026 at 4:53 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I was fired after 31 years as an ER physician with no complaints, says Dr. Charles Hoffe. He claims COVID shots cause more side effects than any treatment in history and that the toxic spike protein reaches every part of the body.

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

"I was fired...after 31 years as an ER Physician & not one single complaint against me." ~Dr Charles Hoffe "These COVID shots have caused greater side effects than any other medical treatment in history. The toxic spike protein ends up in literally every part of your body." https://t.co/YKK5lFVZ6a

Saved - April 12, 2026 at 11:31 AM

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

The vaccine dosage was obviously too high and done too many times. I had the original Wuhan virus before there was any vaccine and it was much like any other cold/flu. Bad, but not terrible. But my second vaccine shot almost sent me to the hospital. Felt like I was dying.

@PeterSweden7 - PeterSweden

This should be headline news EVERYWHERE. A Pfizer insider who was former head of toxicology in Europe has just come out and said something that many "conspiracy theorists" suspected. He estimates that 20 000 to 60 000 people in Germany have died from the c*vid vaccine. This was said at a parliamentary enquiry commission in Germany. So why isn't this massive news being reported everywhere? Is the mainstream media that has recieved millions in funding from Bill Gates deliberately covering this up... 🤔

View Full Interactive Feed