TruthArchive.ai - Related Post Feed

Posted - May 1, 2023 at 9:56 PM

Saved - May 2, 2023 at 8:59 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

The COVID-19 pandemic narrative was artificially inflated by the CDC through the fraudulent use of the PCR test. The FDA, WHO, and even Dr. Anthony Fauci admitted that the PCR test produces up to 90 false positives. The CDC also financially incentivized healthcare providers to diagnose patients with COVID-19. Additionally, the CDC artificially inflated COVID death certificates. The entire country was using PCR tests set at 35 cycles or higher, despite the fact that tests set at this level produce mostly false positives. Asymptomatic spread of COVID-19 is not a concern, natural immunity is robust and durable, and COVID-19 is easily treatable at home.

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

🧵THREAD: Dr. Scott Jensen tells Jordan Peterson that the CDC artificially inflated COVID death numbers. @drscottjensen @jordanbpeterson

Video Transcript AI Summary

The Department of Health sent me an email with a link to the CDC, informing me as a physician about changes to death certificates. They stated that if COVID-19 was a contributing condition, it could be listed as a cause of death. However, I disagreed because there is a separate box on death certificates for listing contributing conditions such as emphysema, asthma, or influenza. We were instructed to include COVID-19 as a cause of death, which I found concerning.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: I received an email from the Department of Health with a link to the CDC advising me as a physician that they were going to adjust the way death certificates were completed. Doctor. What did adjust death certificates mean? Doctor. They said in this document, if you think that COVID nineteen was a contributing condition, you can put it down as a cause of death. And I said, no, there's a box too on a death certificate called contributing conditions. That's where you put contributing conditions. If it's emphysema, if it's asthma, influenza. We put it in the contributing conditions box. We were being told with this disease, we could put it as a cause of death.

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

#2 On March 24, 2020, the CDC altered how death certificates were recorded *EXCLUSIVELY* for COVID-19. "COVID-19 should be reported on the death certificate for all decedents where the disease caused or is assumed to have caused or contributed to death."

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

#3 Two days later, on March 26, 2020, the Department of Health and Human Services financially incentivized healthcare providers, hospitals, and doctors to diagnose patients with COVID-19.

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

#4 The number of COVID cases, hospitalizations, and deaths was further inflated by the fraudulent use of the PCR test. The FDA, WHO, CDC, CNN, the NYT, and even Dr. Anthony Fauci, admitted the PCR test set at a high cycle threshold produces up to 90% false positives.

Video Transcript AI Summary

The PCR test, commonly used for COVID-19, involves a nasal swab. According to Kary Mullis, the Nobel Prize-winning scientist who created the test, it can detect almost anything if amplified enough. However, Mullis himself stated that the PCR test should not be used to diagnose diseases, as it only detects fragments of illness. Many laboratories worldwide run the test at high amplification levels, leading to a high rate of false positives. Even Anthony Fauci acknowledged that results beyond 33 cycles are likely not infectious material. The New York Times reported that 90% of PCR tests were not indicative of active illness. Lowering the amplification cycles resulted in significant reductions in case numbers. In the past, PCR tests have caused false positives, such as in a whooping cough pseudoepidemic. Some criticize Fauci for misleading the public.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: You're familiar with the testing, that's the, the nasal swab, they take this big 4 to 6 inch swab, they jam it down your nose. It's according to PhD Nobel Prize winning scientist, Kary Mullis, who's the doctor that created the PCR test, if you blow that, PCR sample size up big enough, you can see almost anything on anybody. Speaker 1: And with PCR, if you do it well, you can find almost anything in anybody. Speaker 2: Now, in his own words, the PCR test should never be used to diagnose disease. Let me repeat that. The man who created the PCR test said this test should never be used to diagnose disease. It is simply a tool to find if there's even a fragment of an illness inside of somebody. Speaker 0: The big, Laboratories in the United States and across the globe. And I know because I've spoken to almost all of them, the PCR testing is done at 37 to 45 amplifications, which is going to cause a 97% false positive or more. Speaker 2: Even Anthony Fauci said himself That anything you find beyond 33 cycles in a PCR test, meaning, you've amplified it 33 times probably is not infectious material. Speaker 3: If somebody does come in with 37, 38, even 36, you gotta say, you know, it's just it's just dead nucleotides, period. Speaker 2: Yet, when we looked in the United States America had everybody using all the testing facilities and New York Times did this too. All the testing facilities that were doing PCR test, they were running them for 45 cycles. Speaker 4: The New York Times even put out a story, and I'm gonna quote a little bit of what they said. There's glitches in the PCR test. 90% of the tests were not indicative of the active illness. Speaker 5: So what would happen to case numbers if labs cut back to 30? At 1 New York lab, it resulted in a 63% case reduction. When a Massachusetts lab did the same, Almost 90% of their cases disappeared. In 2007, PCR tests caused a pseudoepidemic for whooping cough at a hospital in New Hampshire. 100% of the results were false positives. Speaker 1: Guys like Fauci get up there and start talking. You know, he didn't know anything really about anything, and I'd say that to his face. Nothing. Tony Fauci does not mind going on television in front of the people that pay his salary and lie directly into the camera.

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

#5 In July 2020, Dr. Anthony Fauci admitted that PCR tests set at 35 cycles or higher produced mostly false positives or "dead nucleotides." So why was the entire country using PCR tests set at 35 cycles or higher?

Video Transcript AI Summary

There have been reports of patients shedding viral RNA for weeks, but it doesn't seem to be infectious. The question is whether they are still a threat for transmission. The idea is to use a cutoff of viral loads determined by PCR to determine if a patient is no longer infectious and can go home or to a nursing facility. A cycle threshold of 35 or more is considered to have miniscule chances of being replication competent. It is frustrating for both patients and physicians when the PCR test shows a high cycle threshold, as it is unlikely to culture virus from it. Reporting the threshold cycle is becoming a standard practice in diagnosis.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Exactly. Speaker 1: Alright. There have been number of reports, of patients who shed viral RNA for weeks as determined by PCR. It doesn't seem to be infectious virus and the real question is are they a threat for transmission? And I'm wondering If you think we could use, a cutoff of viral loads determined by PCR to say this patient is no longer infectious can go home, can go to a nursing facility because right now the physicians are really having a hard time with that. Speaker 0: Right. Again, a good question. What is now sort of evolving into a bit of a standard That if you get a cycle threshold of 35 or more, that the chances of it being replication competent are miniscule. So And you know what we do, we have patients and it's very frustrating for the patients as well as for the physicians. Somebody comes in and they repeat their PCR, and it's like 37 cycle threshold. But you never you almost never can culture virus from a 37 threshold cycle. So I think if somebody does come in with 37, 38, Even 36. You got to say, you know, it's just dead nucleotides, period. Speaker 1: Yeah, because as you know, we can't easily culture infectious virus. You don't have a BSL3 lab everywhere. Speaker 0: Exactly. Exactly. Speaker 1: So is, the threshold cycle, is reporting at a pretty standard practice in doing a diagnosis now rather than just positive or negative? Okay. Good. Speaker 0: Yeah. I mean, when you go in, when when I get my test, you know, it's negative. When someone comes in and it's positive, They don't give them the threshold until you go back and ask for it. Speaker 1: Okay. But they they've got it.

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

#6 In August 2020, The New York Times and several experts admitted that up to 90% of positive PCR tests were false positives. In other words, they were not indicative of an active illness that could be transmitted to others. https://archive.ph/4wzQu https://archive.ph/4wzQu

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

#7 In Sept. 2020, CNN's Andrew Cuomo reported that PCR tests were "too sensitive." "In three sets of testing data that include cycle thresholds, compiled by officials in Massachusetts, New York, and Nevada, up to 90% of people testing positive carried barely any virus..."

Video Transcript AI Summary

The widely used PCR tests for COVID-19 are too sensitive, meaning they can detect not only live virus but also dead virus and other materials. The problem is that the results sent to doctors and patients don't specify whether the virus is live or dead. Recent data from Massachusetts, New York, and Nevada showed that 90% of positive cases carried very little virus. If this trend applies nationwide, only a small fraction of positive cases would actually need to isolate and undergo contact tracing. To prevent unnecessary disruptions, it's important to test in a smarter way, focusing on the contagiousness of individuals. This approach would help schools reopen faster and make more sense overall.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: I don't think we're using the right test. Yep. The tests used most widely are too sensitive. What does that mean? Like, too accurate? They're too good? No. They are so called PCR tests, fancy acronym, scientist, polymerized chain reaction. It's about the method you use to extract DNA to see what you're dealing with. Okay? And that's what they're doing here. They look for traces of the virus in genetic samples in a series of cycles. I say that slowly because it's the key. So basically, how does it work? When they put a higher threshold cycle, that means they're looking longer and deeper into your system, which means what? They can catch other things other than live virus. Or what else would they dead virus. Different other kinds of derivative material. So the lower the threshold, The more virus you have in your system, the more contagious you're likely to be. Okay? So what's our problem? Is never included in the results sent to doctors and COVID patients, it's usually very high, like 40 cycles. Now 40 cycles, your positive doesn't tell you positive for what, live virus or dead virus? You had dead virus, are you really infectious? No. You have live virus. Are you really infectious? Maybe. So it matters. A review last month from The New York Times showed that in 3 sets of testing data compiled by officials in Massachusetts, New York, and Nevada, 90% of people testing positive carried barely any virus. Is the takeaway forget testing? No. You must test the right way and test smart. The Times reports, if the rate of contagiousness in Massachusetts and New York were to apply nationwide, then perhaps only 45100 of the roughly 46,000 COVID positive people may actually need to isolate and submit to contact tracing. You see, the test is too sensitive. Think about what that means for schools. Getting it right on those cycle thresholds and knowing just how many patients are actually infectious, that's the key. That's how you stop the slowdowns in the system. That's how we get back to school. It's just common sense. Forget about the acronyms and the polymerase and all these things in the cycles. You isolate those who are more contagious faster, period. Why aren't we doing it?

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

#8 The Atlantic reported on a Harvard Medical School study that found 48% of all hospitalized COVID patients may have been admitted for another reason entirely after analyzing the blood oxygen levels of nearly 50,000 hospital patients across the country. https://theatlantic.com/health/archive/2021/09/covid-hospitalization-numbers-can-be-misleading/620062/ https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2021/09/covid-hospitalization-numbers-can-be-misleading/620062/

Our Most Reliable Pandemic Number Is Losing Meaning A new study suggests that almost half of those hospitalized with COVID-19 have mild or asymptomatic cases. theatlantic.com

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

#9 Dr. Simon Goddek (@goddeketal) explains how the PCR test artificially inflated the pandemic narrative: "If you want to create a pandemic...you create a PCR protocol, you put the cycle threshold between 35-45, and you test healthy people...that's how you create cases."

Video Transcript AI Summary

The speaker discusses the issue of cycle thresholds in PCR testing. They explain that the original protocol used a cycle threshold of 45, which amplifies the results by 10. This means that even unlikely findings, such as particles from Mars, could be detected. The speaker suggests that by using a high cycle threshold, it is possible to create a pandemic by testing healthy individuals and spreading the myth of asymptomatic spread. This is how cases are created, according to the speaker.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Cycle thresholds. Explain to people what you mean by that. So the problem with the PC artist is, at least in the original Drosnin protocol, use a cycle threshold of, of, 45, which is every cycle is, like, amplifies it by 10, which is which is an issue. And to say it like that, if if I tested myself with a PCR test with 45 on on, some sand or, like, particles from Mars. I would probably find them on myself. So you find stuff that's very unlikely to find. So and if you if you want to find if you want if you want to create a pandemic, you do this. You create a PCR protocol. You put the CT between 35 and 45, and you test healthy people because before that, you spread the myth of asymptomatic spread. So that's how you create cases, and that's what they did.

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

#10 In July 2021, Dr. Peter McCullough (@P_McCulloughMD) explained: #1 COVID doesn't spread asymptomatically. #2 Stop testing asymptomatic people. #3 Natural immunity is robust & durable. #4 COVID is easily treatable at home. #5 Vax is obsolete & unsafe for human use.

Video Transcript AI Summary

The speaker makes several points in this video. Firstly, they claim that the virus is not spread by asymptomatic individuals and that testing asymptomatic people generates false positives and unnecessary concerns. They also argue that natural immunity to COVID-19 is strong and long-lasting, and cannot be improved upon by vaccination. The speaker asserts that COVID-19 is easily treatable at home, especially if treatment is started early, and that hospitalization and death can be largely avoided with proper care. Lastly, they state that current COVID-19 vaccines are ineffective against new variants and may even be causing harm.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Number 1, the virus is not spread asymptomatic. Only sick people give it to other people. Number 2, that if we do any we should never do any testing of asymptomatic people, the nasal oral test. All we're doing is generating false positives, creating extra cases if you will and creating extra concerns. The FDA never approved these tests for asymptomatic testing. The World Health Organization as of June 25th has said no asymptomatic testing, none. So there shouldn't be a single person on earth that we're going to be doing. And that's All the regulatory people just ought to walk past those testing stations and they have absolutely no standing whatsoever. Point number 3 is that natural immunity is robust complete and durable there is no meaningful chance of having a second serious case of COVID in fact it's never happened in a confirmed case so far in the world. Any of the purported cases that have come up have involved misinterpretation of a false positive PCR test. It doesn't happen it hasn't happened it fundamentally doesn't happen even in loosely defined cases in a paper by Murchu et al in loosely defined cases where they didn't get an initial test but maybe had positive antibodies Those patients followed 11 studies 650,000 individuals. The rate of any significant COVID infection over the long term was 0.2%. So I can tell you as we sit here today natural immunity is robust complete and durable it cannot be improved upon by vaccination or any other someone who's naturally immune can walk up to somebody with COVID nineteen get a big cough in the face and they're not going to get the illness. Point number 4 COVID nineteen no matter what variant is easily treatable at home and it's amenable to risk stratification. People over age 50, multiple medical problems should all receive forms of treatment, multi drug treatment with simple available drugs at home to prevent hospitalization and death. About 85% of hospitalization death is completely avoidable with early treatment. The only way people end up in who don't have a miserable time is when they receive no treatment. They don't seek treatment or they're not offered treatment or accepted and they end up railroaded into the hospital after being sick 2 weeks at home. Anybody with common sense should understand It's easy to treat the illness when it's say when it's early and they and the symptoms are mild. It becomes progressively worse as people progress in the disease. There are 3 major components viral replication inflammation and thrombosis in the end people die of blood clots and it's very hard to reverse those. That's the reason why if we wait to hospitalization it's too late. If we wait for the oxygen levels to be low because of blood clots in the lungs it's too late. The 4th point, an important point is the current COVID nineteen vaccines AstraZeneca, J and J, Pfizer and Moderna right now are obsolete. They do not cover the new variants, patients are failing on these vaccines, they're being hospitalized and getting sick despite having the vaccines and the vaccines at this point in time have amounted to record mortality and injury and should be considered unsafe and unfit for human use.

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

#11 Dr. Kary Mullis would turn over in his grave if he knew how they abused the PCR test during COVID. H/T @DrLoupis

Video Transcript AI Summary

Speaker 0 criticizes Fauci, claiming he lacks knowledge in various areas. He questions Fauci's understanding of electron microscopy and medicine, suggesting he is unfit for his position. Speaker 0 also asserts that most top officials are merely administrators who lack understanding of the situation. They mention that Fauci has been invited to debate someone knowledgeable on the subject, citing an example of the president of the University of South Carolina asking him to participate in a debate in front of the student body.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Guys like Fauci get up there and start talking. He didn't know anything really about anything and I'd say that to his face. Nothing. The man thinks you can take a blood sample and stick it in an electron microscope and if it's got a virus in there, you'll know it. He He doesn't understand electron microscopy and he doesn't understand medicine and he should not be in a position like he's in. Most of those guys up there on the top are just total administrative people and they don't know anything about what's going on. If Fauci wants to get on television with somebody Who knows a little bit about this stuff and debate them? He could easily do it because he's been asked. I mean, I've had a lot of people, The president of the University of South Carolina asked about you if he'd come down there and debate me on the stage in front of the student body because

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

#12 Why was the entire COVID-19 narrative based on a test that produced 90% false positives? Why did HHS financially incentivize increasing COVID numbers? Why did the CDC artificially inflate COVID death certificates? Why are we still using PCR tests above 35 cycles?

@Wood_House76 — Jessica Hockett

Posted - August 11, 2023 at 2:51 AM

Saved - December 5, 2023 at 3:30 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

Elmhurst Hospital in Queens, NYC, was dubbed the "epicenter of the epicenter" during the COVID-19 pandemic. Questions arise about the accuracy of the initial reports and the media's portrayal of the situation. Medical professionals like Colleen Smith and Cameron Kyle-Siddell raised concerns about the lack of support and resources. The data on occupancy and deaths at Elmhurst Hospital raise further questions. The involvement of military personnel and the donation of ventilators by Tesla add to the complexity. The article highlights the need for transparency and further investigation into what truly happened at Elmhurst Hospital.

@Wood_House76 - Jessica Hockett

Quarterly Emergency Department Visits for Elmhurst Hospital, Queens (NYC) -- the so-called "epicenter of the epicenter" What exactly happened here? Why hasn't anyone been held accountable for the propaganda we were sold?

@Wood_House76 - Jessica Hockett

We were told the scene at Elmhurst was "apocalyptic" Was it? How so?

@Wood_House76 - Jessica Hockett

Colleen Smith - who is also medical simulation specialist 🤔- thought so. "From our perspective, everything is not fine. I don’t have the support that I need, and even just the materials that I need, physically, to take care of my patients." https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bE68xVXf8Kw

@Wood_House76 - Jessica Hockett

"On a regular day, my emergency department’s volume is pretty high. It’s about 200 people a day," said Smith "Now we’re seeing 400 or more people a day." City data say otherwise. ⬇️ What should we make of the gap btw Smith's claims & the public data?

@Wood_House76 - Jessica Hockett

An independent media agent questioned Dr. Smith in near-real time on Twitter Was/is Smith a crisis actor? Did she believe what she was saying?

@Wood_House76 - Jessica Hockett

Days later, on March 31st, Cameron Kyle-Siddell (who was working at Maimonides Hospital in Brooklyn) *blew the whistle* on the use the mechanical ventilation with covid+ patients. He was (and is) hailed as a courageous hero. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k9GYTc53r2o

@Wood_House76 - Jessica Hockett

Yet Kyle-Siddell was quickly embraced by and did an interview with WebMD. Why? Seems pretty strange that Pharma-blessed media would give an actual whistleblower, vs an approved one, a platform in these days. https://www.webmd.com/coronavirus-in-context/video/coronavirus-in-context-cameron-kyle-sidell

Video on COVID-19: Do Vent Protocols Need a Second Look? Listen to medical professionals John Whyte and Cameron Kyle-Sidell discuss rather or not vent protocols need a second look. webmd.com

@Wood_House76 - Jessica Hockett

Jason Goodman (same person who questioned Colleen) gave Kyle-Siddell a couple calls. These calls might be contrived, for all we know, but K-S insists the vents are needed and that what he's seeing is something completely new. https://odysee.com/@Crowdsourcethetruth:d/dr-cameron-kyle-sidell-doesn-t-know-if:8?r=4HXKXcyiYiMfCTeVCZ5Y9NANWfjw6TEm

Dr. Cameron Kyle-Sidell "Doesn't Know" If He Is Part of A Coronavirus Medical Simulation or Not Many people have viewed recent videos posted by Maimonides Medical Center affiliated ER Dr. Cameron Kyle-Sidell. Like so many other social engineers including the New York Times, Dr. Colleen Smith an... odysee.com

@Wood_House76 - Jessica Hockett

Kyle-Siddell also says he knows Colleen Smith. "I actually know Colleen. She was one of my residents." 🧐

@Wood_House76 - Jessica Hockett

In June 2020, Smith, Kyle-Siddell, and other NYC doctors participated in a "live storytelling event" I'll leave it to you, followers and to watch these videos, listen to what's being said. https://www.nyacep.org/practice-resources-2/resources/professional-development-resources

Page not found | New York ACEP | American College of Emergency Physicians nyacep.org

@Wood_House76 - Jessica Hockett

Needless to say, whatever actually happened in NYC hospitals - particularly in March and early April 2020 - is STILL locked inside a Black Box and shrouded in #omerta. After studying this for a year+, I still have more questions than rock-solid answers.

@Wood_House76 - Jessica Hockett

Quarterly Emergency Department Visits for Elmhurst Hospital, Queens (NYC) -- the so-called "epicenter of the epicenter" What exactly happened here? Why hasn't anyone been held accountable for the propaganda we were sold?

@Wood_House76 - Jessica Hockett

Elmhurst's occupancy data - which I obtained earlier this year from NYC H+H - is also not what we were led to believe. This is patients in beds (census), from April 2016 thru December 2020⬇️

@Wood_House76 - Jessica Hockett

I question whether the early March drop was really "canceling elective surgeries" How many deaths (all causes) were there in that period? I requested daily ACM for 2020 and years prior, via FOIL, but still haven't received a response

@Wood_House76 - Jessica Hockett

As for the travel Nurse, Erin O who wrote a book about her time at Elmhurst Hospital, I've read the book and seen the videos. Many things she says corroborate contemporaneous policies & other accounts. However...

@Wood_House76 - Jessica Hockett

Erin said she started at Elmhurst on April 22, 2020 - after the Black Box period.

@erin_bsn - NurseErin

I flew to New York on April 15th, 2020 from Tampa. I was sitting around at my hotel in the middle of a “pandemic” with thousands of other nurses with no assignment (some nurses were sitting around for 3-4 weeks) until I was assigned on April 22nd (my first day at Elmhurst). Is there a discrepancy in my book? If so, I’d like to fix it. Thank you.

@Wood_House76 - Jessica Hockett

The only place we can see death data for Elmhurst is in the state’s wonky facility file, which begins 3/26/20, the same day a new record-keeping system was activated in hospitals Nearly 400 “covid deaths” Essentially a hospital-ful of people. (The 50 in one day is prob backlog, but still)

@Wood_House76 - Jessica Hockett

Both the Elmhurst data and scads of other data I’ve examined lead me to conclude that a good portion of the mass casualty event were people who were already in the hospital People in for other reasons who couldn’t be discharged

@Wood_House76 - Jessica Hockett

What’s really awful about that is that it’s VERY easy to create the appearance of “sudden spread” by simply letting people die and/or changing what you’re doing all at once. Was Colleen Smith in sim/live exercise mode? If so, why? Maybe that death curve isn’t what we think

@Wood_House76 - Jessica Hockett

More examples of the militarized travel nurse/doctor brigade brought in to effectively "verify" that something had happened. @PierreKory also came during this time, I believe.

@paretosnonelite - El Rey-Xi-O

@EWoodhouse7 I posted about this a few months ago and finally got some answers. Wife’s ex-coworker Oncology RN worked at Lincoln in the Bronx. She traveled from AZ to NY and worked 21 12-hr shifts at the rates below. She traveled with 2 other RNs from AZ. Alyssa went to Elmhurst.

@Wood_House76 - Jessica Hockett

Were these ventilators from Tesla ever used at Elmhurst, or was this just for show?

@NYCHealthSystem - NYC Health + Hospitals

Special thanks to @Tesla for a donation of 40 ventilators to our team at NYC Health + Hospitals/Elmhurst #inQueens. These will be essential in the fight against the #coronavirus.

@Wood_House76 - Jessica Hockett

In May 2020, NYC H+H/Elmhurst Hospital employees were "awarded" free vacations from AA & Hyatt Hotels* "to help them recharge & reconnect w/their loved ones, once they are able to take time for themselves." *Owned by The Pritzker Family https://www.hospitalitynet.org/news/4098633.html

American Airlines and Hyatt Surprise Healthcare Workers at NYC Health + Hospitals/Elmhurst with Complimentary Vacations In recognition of the extraordinary care they provide to their community, American Airlines (NASDAQ: AAL) and Hyatt Hotels Corporation (NYSE: H) today announced American Airlines and Hyatt will award thousands of healthcare professionals from NYC Health + Hospitals/Elmhurst three-night complimentary vacations to help them recharge and reconnect with their loved ones, once they are able to take time for themselves. hospitalitynet.org

@Wood_House76 - Jessica Hockett

Monthly ED visits & inpatient admissions for Elmhurst Hospital (2018-2020) alongside "Wave 1" Covid deaths reported to the state, are striking. March 2020 saw only 2 more admits to inpatient than Oct 2019 - & far fewer ED visits Why no media panic earlier in the flu season? 🤔

@Wood_House76 - Jessica Hockett

The data provided to me by NYC H+H via FOIL show that spring 2020 occupancy for Non-ICU and ICU beds combined peaked at 318. This isn't "covid patients" - it's all patients. With that in mind...

@Wood_House76 - Jessica Hockett

How it is possible that Elmhurst lost more than its peak occupancy to "Covid" in this timeframe? Who handled the bodies? Were any deaths NOT blamed on Covid-19?

@Wood_House76 - Jessica Hockett

Indeed, the state's data show more than peak spring occupancy died at Elmhurst in ONE MONTH. Ostensibly, these deaths were from sudden spread of a virus with an IFR comparable to flu AT MOST. Where is the federal inquiry @RepThomasMassie @randpaul @SenRonJohnson?

@Wood_House76 - Jessica Hockett

@RepThomasMassie @RandPaul @SenRonJohnson The reporting of 49 covid deaths in a single day is ridiculous - and most likely a data dump. Is there a reason someone found dozens of deaths to blame on Covid before the end of April? When did those deaths actually occur, assuming they did occur?

@Wood_House76 - Jessica Hockett

And NO real increase in covid deaths to speak of after the mass casualty event? Elmhurst (and other NYC hospitals) figured out "how to handle the virus," but didn't tell Chicago and L.A. hospitals? Super sus, to say the least.

@Wood_House76 - Jessica Hockett

In May, I sent this FOIL request to NYC Health + Hospital (the same entity that provided the Elmhurst occupancy data). My request was acknowledged, but I still haven't received responsive records or an update -- even after following & asking about the status several times.

@Wood_House76 - Jessica Hockett

This ⬇️ photo of the waiting room of the Elmhurst ER, taken on April 12, 2020 and posted by @cordeliers, is 100% corroborated by the Elmhurst ED visit data.

@Wood_House76 - Jessica Hockett

@cordeliers 🔎Closer look at Elmhurst ICU occupancy in early 2020: 🧐 Below the 2017-19 avg 🧐 Shows a different "flow"/pattern than prior yrs 🧐 Saw drops/decline after mid-Feb, pre "15 days" Note: Declines in ICU occ = transfer to non-ICU, discharged alive, or discharged dead

@Wood_House76 - Jessica Hockett

Back to occupancy for all beds. Look at January. Tell me @NYCHealthSystem - did you experience deaths in your hospitals that were pushed forward? What happened before the official "lockdown"?

@Wood_House76 - Jessica Hockett

The data provided to me by NYC H+H via FOIL show that spring 2020 occupancy for Non-ICU and ICU beds combined peaked at 318. This isn't "covid patients" - it's all patients. With that in mind...

@Wood_House76 - Jessica Hockett

Also, per the data I obtained, Elmhurst's norm ICU occupancy was ~75 Peak ICU occ in spring 2020 was 88 pts Why does this 4/2/2020 article say, "Throughout the initial surge, Elmhurst has added 82 ICU beds, bringing the total available to 111"? https://qns.com/2020/04/citys-public-health-system-to-triple-icu-capacity-and-expand-personnel-as-covid-19-surge-continues/

City’s public health system to triple ICU capacity and expand personnel as COVID-19 surge continues – QNS.com The city is racing to increase capacity and expand personnel at its 11 public hospitals, including Elmhurst Hospital which has been overwhelmed with COVID-19 qns.com

@Wood_House76 - Jessica Hockett

To clarify, this is NOT a percent graph. It’s raw number of beds occupied by patients

@Wood_House76 - Jessica Hockett

We still don't know what was going on inside Elmhurst or any NYC hospital, esp in March 2020. Videos from the June 2020 "storytelling" event that Colleen Smith & other docs participated give reasons to disbelieve both the narrative AND counter-narrative https://x.com/EWoodhouse7/status/1701810597644337621?s=20

@Wood_House76 - Jessica Hockett

Another familiar face at the event: Colleen Smith Colleen was featured by the NYT in a video and article about Elmhurst Hospital in Queens (aka "the epicenter of the epicenter") She talks about her media whirlwind in this story https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FCC_6WEEWXI

@Wood_House76 - Jessica Hockett

It's truly amazing that the NYT has never issued any corrections or clarifications about the video they made with Colleen. The things she said didn't make sense back then, but they're even more eyebrow-raising now... https://x.com/EWoodhouse7/status/1702441352414343631?s=20

@Wood_House76 - Jessica Hockett

NYT, March 25, 2020 Dr. Colleen Smith essentially says Elmhurst Hospital is seeing "coronavirus" in everybody coming in, from people with stomach pain to car accident victims to "a lot of patients who probably had COVID, but we didn’t realize [it]" 🧐

Video Transcript AI Summary

Patients presenting with abdominal pain but no fever were found to have x-ray and chest CT findings consistent with COVID-19. Even individuals involved in car accidents were showing lung abnormalities resembling the coronavirus. Many residents, nurses, and attending physicians contracted the virus, highlighting the extent of its spread within the healthcare setting. The anxiety surrounding this situation is immense.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: And then we started to realize that patients who were coming in with no fever but abdominal pain actually had findings on their x rays and chest CTs that were consistent with this coronavirus, COVID nineteen. So if someone in a car accident gets brought in we get a CT scan of them and their lungs look like they have coronavirus. We were seeing a lot of patients who probably had COVID, but we didn't realize 10 residents and also many, many of our nurses and a few of the attending physicians got sick. The anxiety of this situation is really overwhelming.

@Wood_House76 - Jessica Hockett

Questions about Elmhurst's ICU occupancy https://x.com/EWoodhouse7/status/1705364164011606387?s=20

@Wood_House76 - Jessica Hockett

Questions about NYC's Elmhurst Hospital ICU Bed Occupancy in 2020 vs. prior years: 1. Why was occupancy lower? 2. Why was the pattern different (prior to mid-Feb especially)? 3. What was happening between Feb 14-29, before the city's first COVID case was announced on Mar 1?

@Wood_House76 - Jessica Hockett

Elmhurst annual inpatient discharges vs annual inpatients discharged dead. Over double the deaths in 2020, with the lowest total discharges since 2009. 🧐 Most of the death increase happened in matter of weeks. What should we make of this?

@Wood_House76 - Jessica Hockett

Military personnel came into Elmhurst in early April 2020. The "Elmhurst Hospital Support Mission" https://x.com/Wood_House76/status/1724300884572618876?s=20

@Wood_House76 - Jessica Hockett

"Elmhurst Hospital Support Mission"? 🤔

@Wood_House76 - Jessica Hockett

In a 4/22/20 interview, Master Sgt. Matthew Zimmer said, "They turned the entire hospital into COVID wards." 🤔 Referring to Elmhurst staff: "This was not our show when we showed up; this was their show." 🤔 https://www.dvidshub.net/video/751142/106th-rescue-wing-support-elhmhurst-hospital?sub_id=239301&utm_campaign=subscriptions&utm_medium=email&utm_source=239301&utm_content=asset_link

106th Rescue Wing Support at Elhmhurst Hospital Master Sgt. Matthew Zimmer, a pararescueman assigned to the 106th Rescue Wing, explains support provided by the New York Air National Guard at Elmhurst Hospital for COVID-19, in Queens, N.Y., April 22, 2020. dvidshub.net

@Wood_House76 - Jessica Hockett

Zimmerman also talks about how busy the ER was. The data contradict his claim. 🧐

@Wood_House76 - Jessica Hockett

This ⬇️ photo of the waiting room of the Elmhurst ER, taken on April 12, 2020 and posted by @cordeliers, is 100% corroborated by the Elmhurst ED visit data.

@Wood_House76 - Jessica Hockett

Another contradiction: 104th Fighter Wing article says the hospital's ICU "normally held 35 patients." But data I obtained from NYC H+H shows Elmhurst's ICU occupancy was usually between 50 - 75 patients 🤔 cc: @snorman1776

@Wood_House76 - Jessica Hockett

FYI, Elmhurst Hospital is in the Corona neighborhood of Queens Is it strange that an allegedly deadly, super-spreading novel pathogen happened to "hit" that 'hood? Corona Virus? 🤡

@Wood_House76 - Jessica Hockett

More from the Department of Things That Don't Make Sense: Elmhurst Edition "Elmhurst had a patient roster that was over 230% capacity during the last week of February and the first week of March of 2020. Nearly all of those patients were critically ill with COVID-19." What does patient roster mean? The last wk of Feb/early week of March is before the WHO declaration and "15 days to slow the spread" 🚩 https://abcnews.go.com/amp/Health/ny-hospital-faced-covid-devastation-back-brink/story?id=76638912

How NY hospital faced COVID devastation and came back from the brink March 2021 marks the anniversary of the pandemic overtaking Elmhurst Hospital, Now, the hospital's essential workers are reflecting on the trauma last spring. abcnews.go.com

@Wood_House76 - Jessica Hockett

"It was almost like a war" Maybe it was staged that way? U.S. government, et al ▪️trying to convince everyone sudden spread of a virus from Wuhan was occurring? ▪️seizing the opportunity for a systems-testing exercise? ▪️hiding something else that was happening?

@Wood_House76 - Jessica Hockett

Three workers from the Materials Management dept at Elmhurst purportedly died from COVID in those weeks? Come on, now. This is insane. https://people.com/health/nyc-hospitals-workers-died-coronavirus-after-handing-out-masks/

Three New York City Hospital Workers Died from Coronavirus Weeks After Handing Out Masks Doctors and nurses aren't the only hospital workers who are putting themselves at risk during the ongoing coronavirus pandemic people.com

@TexasLindsay_ — Te𝕏asLindsay™

Posted - August 11, 2023 at 10:50 PM

Saved - August 27, 2023 at 10:14 PM

@TexasLindsay_ - Te𝕏asLindsay™

Sharing this again since I can’t figure out why this news isn’t being covered by everyone in the U.S. right now. CDC Data Shows Excess Mortality for Ages 0–24 is at 44.8% Babies, toddlers, teenagers, young adults—are dying 45% above the historical & projected levels.

@VigilantFox — The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Posted - August 19, 2023 at 10:40 PM

Saved - September 1, 2023 at 10:26 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

Damning data reveals a concerning rise in mortality among young people, not solely due to COVID-19. The Society of Actuaries' report shows a 22% increase in deaths compared to expected numbers from 2015-2019. Even with vaccines, mortality rates remain high, with a shocking 214% surge in non-COVID deaths among 15-34-year-olds. Disturbingly, deaths among 35-44-year-olds saw a 34% increase in the last quarter of 2022. The mainstream narrative of healthcare disruptions doesn't explain why the elderly aren't most affected. Edward Dowd suggests COVID vaccines as the culprit behind this silent youth health crisis. The urgency to address this crisis is crucial.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

🚨 THREAD: Damning Life Insurance Data Proves Far More Young People Are Dying — And It’s Not from COVID When data speaks, we must listen. The Society of Actuaries paints a dire picture: A health crisis in American youth...

Video Transcript AI Summary

According to data from the Society of Actuaries and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, there were excess deaths in 2020 and 2021 due to COVID-19. The actual to expected death ratios were 122% from April to December 2020 and 116.4% for the full year. In 2021, the death rate remained relatively the same despite the vaccine rollout. The age group with the highest actual to expected deaths was 35 to 64 years old. Non-COVID deaths were also higher in the 15 to 34 year old age group. Excess deaths in 2022 remained similar to previous years, indicating other factors were causing these deaths. The discussion on these findings should be more open.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: So 2020 to 2021, these are the most complete years. So this is the Society of Actuaries and they do their own research the insurance industry. Check out the references, of course, they're always there. Now deaths reported by the U. S. Center For Disease Control and Prevention. Now, this is really a bit of a weakness in their data and a lot of the data does come from the Centers For Disease Control. But this is what we have to analyze. So this is all we can do at the moment. And what they do is, they have these actual to expected ratios, of A to E, actual deaths to expected deaths. So for example, April to December 2020, it was 122%. So April to December 2020 is in the pandemic, okay, you might expect that to a degree in the older age range. Very few younger people thankfully died of COVID in the pandemic. But 22% over what we would expect. For the full year of 2020, so that was April to December, for the full year it was 116%, 0.4%. 13.3% excess deaths there were due to COVID. 3% were not due to COVID. But the point is the excess deaths were not due to COVID also occurring in the younger age group. Full year of 2021, completed at 117%. So we actually don't see a lot of difference there, 116.4% to 117% in the overall death rate. And yet, of course, in 2021, when the vaccines were being rolled out, we would expect, If the vaccines were so protective, as we've been told, the death rate will plummet, but it didn't. The death rate did not plummet due to the vaccine rollout. Not by any means. It went up by 0.6% of anything, but essentially, I think we could say essentially stayed the same. So questions to be asked there immediately, both in terms of what's causing the excess deaths and why the vaccines weren't saving a lot more lives. And in both years, the age group with the highest actual to expected deaths was the 35 to 64 year old age group, the relatively middle aged adult sort of age range. During 2021, excess deaths were high in All age groupings, okay, we're still in the pandemic. But 15 to 34 year old non COVID deaths were 21.4% higher, as we said. Now these are non COVID deaths. Remarkably higher. Data through to March 2022, excess deaths, all age range 115%. So really not much difference there in 2022. And we would expect a huge reduction in 2022, of course, because that was the time when Omicron One came along. Omicron 2022 was very much an Omicron year, way less people dying, way less pathogenicity in the disease. And yet, essentially, The figures for excess deaths are the same, indicating that other factors were causing those excess deaths other than COVID. So the proportion of excess deaths attributable to COVID was way lower in 2022 than in 2021. And it's really surprising that Society of Actuaries is not delving deeper into these causes because they're the ones that have to, well, basically, clearly. They're the ones that have to make the financial settlements. They have to cough up the cash for those that died, that were insured. Data through to March 2022, excess test, basically the same as we said, 115.2 percent, so not a lot of change. And as we said, the last part of 2022 from the latest report, 34% excess mortality in that age range, but higher excess mortalities in all age ranges to some extent. Non COVID deaths. Now, let's just have a look at some of these graphics here. Where are we? There we go. Yes. So females. Now this is females by age group. So, we see the different age groups here. So this highest one here, this purple age range, that's the 15 to 34. And we see that they're way above the dotted baseline, really all the time from 2020 through to 2022. And basically, that is true for all age ranges, particularly the 15 to 34 and the 35 to 64 year old age ranges, well above baseline. And that, and looking at it in males, again, we see even a more striking picture in males really. Clearly, these age ranges above the baseline of deaths that we would expect. Again, these are all directly from their website. Now, I've written this. If the main issue was lack of access to health care, why are excess deaths higher in 15 to 34 year olds followed by 35 to 64 year olds, because, of course, the people that need health care most are the older age ranges. Thankfully, For most people, the middle years of life are reasonably healthy. So this is not explained entirely by the a lack of availability to health care, which is the main thing that's normally put forward by the people that are trying to explain this in terms of trying to blame it on the pandemic, the fact that people were locked up and couldn't get access to health care. Well, it's simply not supported. We're not fully supported by this data. Why is the discussion on this not much more open, which is what we want to see on this channel, of course?

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#2 - The rise in mortality among young individuals isn't solely tied to COVID-19 — far from it. Most of this data comes from the US CDC, but there are limitations in their data collection and transparency.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#3 - Dr. John Campbell dived into the Society of Actuaries data on Actual-to-Expected (A/E) Death Ratios. These ratios compare recorded deaths to what we'd expect based on a 2015-2019 baseline.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#4 - from April-Dec 2020, the A/E ratio was 122% — 22% more deaths than expected. By the end of 2020, 16.4% excess mortality was noted. Notably, 13.3% of these were from COVID. This makes sense because there was yet a "miracle vaccine" to save us.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#5 - Then 2021 came with vaccines as our "savior." Yet, the A/E ratio was 117%. Mortality rates remained stubbornly high, and a horrifying 21.4% increase in non-COVID deaths among 15-34 year-olds.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#6 - 2022 should've been different. The Omicron variant was less severe. But by March 2022, the A/E ratio was 115%—excluding COVID deaths. Distressingly, deaths among 35-44-year-olds saw a 34% surge in the last quarter.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#7 - Graphs for 15 to 64-year-olds show consistent spikes in deaths. Pundits say its because of disruptions to healthcare access. If so, why aren't the elderly most affected? The mainstream narrative doesn't add up.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#8 - Edward Dowd (@DowdEdward) raises a startling hypothesis in his book, "Cause Unknown." He asserts the COVID vaccines are the culprit. Young people, in their prime, are suddenly collapsing. Check out the evidence from just the past 8 months...

Video Transcript AI Summary

Several young athletes have tragically collapsed and died during sports activities, with some experiencing cardiac arrest. The causes of these incidents are still unknown, and in some cases, the athletes had no prior health issues. One athlete survived cardiac arrest but requires a life vest to monitor his heart. There have been concerns raised about the potential connection between these incidents and COVID-19 vaccinations, although no conclusive evidence has been presented. The high number of heart-related issues among young people has raised alarm, and some believe that something is amiss. The mortality rates in younger age groups have been unusually high, prompting questions about the "new normal" we are experiencing.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: He was playing a pickup soccer game when he collapsed and went into cardiac arrest. He died at the hospital. The Northwestern high school basketball player who collapsed during a game last week has passed away. That high school at a football player on Long Island who collapsed on the field. Family says he is going to be taken off of life support, and his organs will be donated. The 17 year old cross country athlete at Geyer High School. He walked into this bathroom after a workout with his teammates and never walked back out. His coach found at him. They don't know how long he was down, but seconds matter during a cardiac event. CPR was performed, but it was too late. Speaker 1: Elijah Jordan Brown Garcia was at involved in light football drills last Friday here in the field at Westside Park. He collapsed right near his younger brother. We're Still waiting for a report from the medical examiner to find out how this 12 year old died. Speaker 0: Leo Delgado had collapsed on the court during a basketball tournament at Mass Premier at Quartz in Foxborough. The Haverhill 17 year old had had a seizure, and then his heart stopped. 15 year old, Canaan at Nickman collapsed on the high school track during soccer practice. Kanan survived cardiac arrest, but his heart needs to at He's wearing a life vest. It's attached to him at all times. It alerts him of any issues, shocks him if necessary, and sends out calls for out. Mother of a player on the team performed lifesaving CPR until the ambulance got there. But in the ambulance, Piper lost her pulse again. At 19 year old Liam Milgenstein. He collapsed backward and died about an hour later. Hello. I wanted to Speaker 2: need a a heart transplant. The official diagnosis is myocarditis. Speaker 3: Collapsing during afternoon at practice. Ebony had suffered the dreaded widowmaker heart attack. And less than 2 weeks later, he underwent a heart transplant. Speaker 0: The team was playing basketball when he went into cardiac arrest. Speaker 1: Basketball player collapses student athlete collapsed. Collapse. At Speaker 2: Collapsed. Collapsed. Speaker 3: Bronnie James suffered at Cardiac arrest while at a Speaker 4: practice Oscar Cabrera died this week after an apparent heart attack. Cabrera believes he has suffered from myocarditis. Social media posts surfaced in which Cabrera suggested he developed the rare heart disease after he received 2 doses of a COVID Speaker 2: at Ash was very healthy up until, two and a half weeks ago, and he's been vaccinated. I was wondering, like, why he was so healthy and then and when I left him in the hospital, he was fine. And then, a couple of days later, he's on life at on ventilation and, you know, his his heart's, damage. Speaker 0: He was live on air when Shaka Hislop suffered a medical emergency. Alyssa Carlson suddenly collapses during the live 7 AM broadcast. Now, Nariman, I I'm looking at, after the day, families are pushing feds to pushing the feds to. Sorry, Irma. I'm I'm not feeling very well right now. I'm about to Okay. We'll Come back to me right now, and we'll make sure that, Jessica, you are doing okay. Speaker 1: Goodbye, bipartisan cooperation and a string of Jamie Fox, now reportedly recovering at a physical rehabilitation center. Specializes in treating patients with stroke and brain injuries. Speaker 4: And every once Just a while, I just burst into tears. It's because I went to hell and back. Speaker 5: Tomorrow morning, Deon Sanders is set to have emergency at surgery to fix blood clots in his leg. Speaker 0: Corey Kelly recovering this morning after collapsing in public, reportedly now being treated for blood Speaker 1: us. Speaker 0: They know, you know, why he went into cardiac arrest, doctors? Just yeah. No, they don't. He doesn't have any health issues or heart issues in the past. At just 18. Lexi went into sudden cardiac arrest. Her doctor still doesn't know why. Liam Had no known health issues. Speaker 1: Didn't really have much symptoms. Never really thought anything was wrong. Speaker 0: He didn't have any underlying health issues, anything. Ebony had a heart attack at the heart transplant. She's a kid who's never been sick a day in her life. Speaker 4: I opened the paper, and I saw this girl had died Unexpectedly with 33 year old actor, model, artist, and Speaker 1: she woke up and died. Speaker 4: And they're not sure why. Speaker 1: Teenage hockey player Who died on the ice. Collapseman died. Died. Speaker 0: Died. Died. Died. Died. Died. Died. Died. Died. Died. Speaker 1: Died. Died. Died. Died. Died. Died. Speaker 4: Who knows? Young people are dying these days. Speaker 5: 8 months, folks. I'll I'll make the same caveat because by tomorrow morning, New York Times, Washington Post, someone's gonna write that the high wire Just put out a video claiming that all these people were having these issues because of vaccinations. Let me be perfectly clear. We did not, you know, reach out to all the individuals involved in that montage and find out if they had the vaccine. I suppose some of them maybe didn't. And that is not the question I'm asking him. I'm not trying to prove to you vaccines are doing this. What I'm asking once again is you ever remember a news cycle, a year, where this many children were having heart attacks, blood clots, widowmakers in teenagers? That's all I'm gonna say. Something seems drastically off. Our, you know, all cause mortality rates in specifically younger people, 18 to about 54 are off the charts and everyone wants to act like nothing is going on or as they promised us, the new normal at Seems to be upon us.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@DowdEdward #9 - Throughout the pandemic, it was about "health" & "saving lives." But amid this youth health crisis, there is complete silence. Why doesn't anyone seem to care? Because while COVID-19 is now well behind us, a more insidious health crisis is unfolding right before our eyes.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@DowdEdward /END To read/share this thread in its elongated format, you can do so from @VigilantNews. https://vigilantnews.com/post/damning-life-insurance-data-proves-far-more-young-people-are-dying-and-its-not-from-covid

Damning Life Insurance Data Proves Far More Young People Are Dying — And It’s Not from COVID While COVID-19 is now well behind us, a more insidious health crisis is unfolding right before our eyes. vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@DowdEdward @VigilantNews And while you're here, check out these other stories I wrote that I think you'll like: 🚨 100% of ‘Died Suddenly’ Autopsy Cases Causally Connected to the COVID Vaccine, According to Review https://vigilantnews.com/post/100-of-died-suddenly-autopsy-cases-causally-connected-to-the-covid-vaccine-according-to-review

100% of ‘Died Suddenly’ Autopsy Cases Causally Connected to the COVID Vaccine, According to Review If the claims and findings detailed in this study stand undisputed, the COVID-19 vaccine could be viewed as the greatest medical mistake in history. vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@DowdEdward @VigilantNews RFK Jr. Identifies “The Real Shooter” Behind His Father’s Death https://vigilantnews.com/post/rfk-jr-identifies-the-real-shooter-behind-his-fathers-death

RFK Jr. Identifies “The Real Shooter” Behind His Father’s Death “When I sat down and read the autopsy report, it became clear to me, as it would to anybody who read that report, that Sirhan could not have killed my father.” vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@DowdEdward @VigilantNews The ‘Next Pandemic’: What You Need to Do to Be Ready https://vigilantnews.com/post/the-next-pandemic-what-you-need-to-do-to-be-ready

The ‘Next Pandemic’: What You Need to Do to Be Ready “You’ve seen all the threats from the establishment suggesting that there’s not going to be drug availability in the not-too-distant future ... So, look at that and protect yourselves.” vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@DowdEdward @VigilantNews Can You Overdose on Ivermectin? Dr. Pierre Kory's Answer Will Shock You https://vigilantnews.com/post/can-you-overdose-on-ivermectin-dr-pierre-korys-answer-will-shock-you

Can You Overdose on Ivermectin? Dr. Pierre Kory's Answer Will Shock You "One of the safest drugs in history." vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@DowdEdward @VigilantNews Reduce Your Cancer Risk by 60%: 10 Things You Can Do, Per Dr. Paul Marik https://vigilantnews.com/post/reduce-your-cancer-risk-by-60-10-things-you-can-do-per-dr-paul-marik

Reduce Your Cancer Risk by 60%: 10 Things You Can Do, Per Dr. Paul Marik Dr. Marik presented a randomized controlled trial published in a peer-reviewed prestigious journal, Frontiers in Aging, which basically shows that “three simple interventions can reduce your risk of cancer.” vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@DowdEdward @VigilantNews Ed Dowd Drops Bombshell Data: Hematological (Blood-Related) Claims Up 522% Above Trend in 2022 https://vigilantnews.com/post/ed-dowd-drops-bombshell-data-hematological-blood-related-claims-up-522-above-trend-in-2022

Ed Dowd Drops Bombshell Data: Hematological (Blood-Related) Claims Up 522% Above Trend in 2022 “The trends were stable — and then this exploded.” vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@DowdEdward @VigilantNews “X” Is Not Living Up to What Elon Musk Promised: Here’s Why https://vigilantnews.com/post/x-is-not-living-up-to-what-elon-musk-promised-heres-why

“X” Is Not Living Up to What Elon Musk Promised: Here’s Why Elon Musk is widely hailed as a genius, a disruptor, and sometimes, a misfit. However, several of his promises to uphold Twitter (now X) as a ‘“free speech” platform have fallen through. vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@DowdEdward @VigilantNews Cancer Virus Found in COVID Shots: “This Is Looking Very Bad,” Says Dr. Peter McCullough vigilantnews.com/post/cancer-vi…

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@DowdEdward @VigilantNews The Unvaccinated Will Be Vindicated: A Tribute to the Citizen Heroes of Our Time https://vigilantnews.com/post/the-unvaccinated-will-be-vindicated-a-tribute-to-the-citizen-heroes-of-our-time

The Unvaccinated Will Be Vindicated: A Tribute to the Citizen Heroes of Our Time Mandates are now becoming a thing of the past, thanks to brave freedom fighters who had the courage to say NO. vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@DowdEdward @VigilantNews Two years ago, I never imagined that I would be reporting the news every day. It's been a wild ride, and all your support has been nothing short of incredible. I'm beyond grateful to be able to take this next step. Thank you all. And don't forget to give @VigilantNews a follow. https://t.co/jtMFQUYG0n

@EWoodhouse7 — Jessica Hockett

Posted - August 23, 2023 at 8:19 PM

Saved - August 25, 2023 at 4:15 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

The US government wants you to believe that the newly detected coronavirus caused a surge in respiratory disease mortality due to mass testing and shutdowns. However, the numbers don't add up. This virus supposedly killed 33 more people in 13 weeks than all other respiratory diseases combined in 21 weeks. It's not scientifically plausible. We need to reclassify iatrogenic deaths and consider other factors. Medical misadventures and crime have their own ICD codes.

@EWoodhouse7 - Jessica Hockett

The U.S. government wants you to believe: 1) A newly-detected deadly coronavirus wasn't doing anything to hospital respiratory disease mortality til the advent of mass testing and shutdowns. 2) This CV was capable of killing ~33% more people in 13 weeks than had died in 21 weeks by all other respiratory disease causes. 3) There were *enough* people vulnerable to this CV at this point in the flu season, when the most vulnerable would've already died. This is not biologically/epidemiologically or mechanistically plausible. At minimum, every iatrogenic death in those weeks needs to be removed from U07.1 and re-classified under the correct ICD code.

@EWoodhouse7 - Jessica Hockett

He who has ears, let him hear. ⬇️

@EWoodhouse7 - Jessica Hockett

No, but there are ICD codes for "medical misadventures" and crime. https://t.co/TdO1gqCXFV

@EpochTimes — The Epoch Times

Posted - October 8, 2023 at 7:50 PM

Saved - October 9, 2023 at 2:40 PM

@EpochTimes - The Epoch Times

‘No Lives Were Saved’ by COVID-19 Vaccines, Scientists Estimate As the number of deaths clearly increased, upon closer examination, they noticed that the excess deaths coincided with the timing of the #COVID19 vaccine program rollout.

Video Transcript AI Summary

Scientists studied the death rates in several countries during the pandemic and vaccine rollout. They found that all-cause mortality increased every time COVID-19 vaccines were deployed. In 9 out of 17 countries, there were no excess deaths before the vaccine campaign began. Unprecedented peaks in all-cause mortality were observed in January-February 2022, following the rollout of boosters in 15 of the 17 countries. The excess all-cause mortality during the vaccination period was 1,740,000 deaths across all ages and countries, with a vaccine dose fatality rate of almost 5% among those 90 years and older who received a 4th vaccine dose. The study found no evidence of a beneficial effect from COVID-19 vaccine rollouts.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: These are the deaths that happened in Malaysia. It's a country in Southeast Asia. Scientists wanted to study what happened to the overall death rate during the pandemic, the deaths clearly increased. But, look, this is where the pandemic was declared, and this is when the vaccine program rolled out. Same thing happened in 9 other countries. Here's Australia. New Zealand. The Philippines. Singapore. After studying over a dozen countries in the southern hemisphere, the scientists concluded that after 13a half 1000000000 COVID vaccines that were given out worldwide, 17,000,000 people lost their lives from vaccines alone. And the death rate data for the elderly was just shocking. Welcome to frontline health. Understand Scoreback. In a new report that's yet to be peer reviewed, Canadian scientists looked at the pandemic from a thousand foot view. They wanted to see how much the pandemic affected all cause mortality. You see the virus can kill in many ways, not just from the visible infection symptoms. If you want to find the real cause of death, you have to dissect each and every single person who died for any reason and looked at the body under a microscope. You can see if they die from COVID or not. On the other hand, the authors explain, you can look at the big picture, the metadata, meaning look at that all cause mortality, which basically means that the scientists remove the reasons for the deaths and look at death itself as a measure. Did more people die in this period of time? Then it's easy to tell if our approach to solving a pandemic worked on a population level or it didn't. So the best way to measure what happened during the pandemic is to look at all cause mortality. And these scientists were also interested in how the data turned out during another event, specifically during the rollout of COVID 19 vaccines. You see, their initial research showed some shocking correlations. Between vaccine rollout and people dying, but some people argued that it might be just a seasonal effect example, the vaccines were rolled out in some countries in January February, and that coincides with the flu season. So this time, the scientists looked at a much larger subset of data and measured what happened in the countries that had vaccines rolled out in different seasons, even during summer, which is way outside the flu season. So let's look at the report. First, they found that in all countries that were included in their analysis, all cause mortality increased Every time the COVID 19 vaccines were deployed. 2nd, 9 out of the 17 countries had no detectable excess death right after the March 11 2020 event. That's when the World Health Organization declared the pandemic, and these countries didn't have access up until the COVID 19 vaccination campaign began. 3rd, unprecedented peaks in all cause mortality were observed in January February 2022. This coincided with or followed the rollout of boosters in 15 of the 17 countries studied. And while it was winter in North America, in those months, it was summer in most of the South America. So the flu season was not a factor there at all. 4. Excess all cause mortality during the vaccination period beginning January 2021 was 1,740,000 deaths across all ages and countries. That makes up one death for every 800 injections. And 5, the vaccine dose fatality rate increased exponentially with age. Reaching almost 5% among those 90 years older who received a 4th vaccine dose, which translates to 1 in 20 deaths from COVID vaccines among the elderly. Dennis Randcourt, one of the authors of the study told the epoch Times in an email that, quote, there is no evidence In a hard data of all cause mortality of a beneficial effect from the COVID 19 vaccine rollouts. No lives were saved. Researchers also looked for a counter example. Maybe there were places that showed that COVID 19 vaccines improved the all cause mortality. But they could not find a single country with such trends. According to the report, data from numerous countries such as India, Australia, Canada, Israel, and the United States show a similar phenomena. The peaks in all cause mortality coincide with booster rollouts every time. In the United States, specifically, deaths were prominent in the 25 to 64 age group in 20 one States. Coinciding with a rapid surge in vaccines given during the vaccine equity campaigns launched by regulatory agencies. Researchers estimated that United States had about 160,000 excess deaths in that age group during a period where over 60,000,000 COVID 19 vaccine doses were given out. So if your friend or family member is thinking about or being pressured into getting a COVID 19 vaccine, Please share this report with them so that they can make an informed decision. This is One Line Health. I'm Dan Skorback. Stay healthy America.

@problem_we — WE GOT A PROBLEM

Posted - November 22, 2023 at 11:39 AM

Saved - November 22, 2023 at 1:02 PM

@problem_we - WE GOT A PROBLEM

this 18-second clip should end the Covid Inquiry instantly and start the criminal investigations for fraud, misuse of public funds. Misconduct in public office and countless others "even at the height of the pandemic, more people died of causes, not covid than died of covid" https://t.co/kpKMhvjf0N

Video Transcript AI Summary

During the height of the pandemic, it's important to acknowledge that more people died from non-COVID causes than from COVID itself. It's tragic that lives were lost on both sides.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: And I think it is also important to recognize that, people would have been wrong to swing the hold of the medical profession height of the pandemic, more people died of causes professionals and not COVID than died of COVID. Every one of those deaths is tragic on both of those sides.

@DrHenryEaly — Dr Henry Ealy

Posted - November 25, 2023 at 3:45 PM

Saved - November 25, 2023 at 7:24 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

Title: Uncovering COVID-19 Data Fraud and Manipulation: A Comprehensive Analysis Summary: This article exposes the alleged COVID-19 data fraud and manipulation, highlighting key events and actors involved. It discusses the questionable predictions, changes in death certificate reporting, inflated case counts, and financial incentives. The role of Bill Gates and various organizations is emphasized. The article also touches upon the potential motives behind these actions and their implications for public health. The aim is to shed light on the alleged fraud and encourage further investigation. Character count: 499 characters.

@DrHenryEaly - Dr Henry Ealy

SAVE THE DATE December 5th💫 Oral Arguments💫 Do Americans have the right to get evidence to a Grand Jury for Investigation? Evidence that definitively proves COVID criminal data fraud by the CDC and insurance fraud by the HHS? Join The Fight💫 http://www.BeyondTheCon.com

Join The Fight for a Grand Jury Investigation! Join the fight to see an independent Special Grand Jury investigate all aspects of COVID and hold anyone guilty of wrong doing accountable! beyondthecon.com

@DrHenryEaly - Dr Henry Ealy

My team was the first to prove that the death count from the damn shots exceed the death count from the China-US lab generated SARS-CoV-2 virus. In '21 what we had proven was outlandish. In '23 it's common knowledge. @P_McCulloughMD How did 'they' do it?

@DrHenryEaly - Dr Henry Ealy

@P_McCulloughMD The first global lie was paid for by Bill Gates via the Imperial College of London courtesy of Neil Ferguson, his $cience prostitute. Remember the prediction of 2.2 Million deaths if we didn't lockdown? https://www.aier.org/article/the-failure-of-imperial-college-modeling-is-far-worse-than-we-knew/

The Failure of Imperial College Modeling Is Far Worse than We Knew "Just over one year ago, the epidemiology modeling of Neil Ferguson and Imperial College played a preeminent role in shutting down most of the world. The exaggerated forecasts of this modeling team are now impossible to downplay or deny, and extend to almost every country on earth. Indeed, they... aier.org

@DrHenryEaly - Dr Henry Ealy

@P_McCulloughMD The next lie was also paid for by Bill Gates via the IHME at Washington University. Elected officials were using these lies daily on TV. No surprise they predicted massive deaths without lockdowns too. How to lie with statistics anyone? https://www.thenation.com/article/society/gates-covid-data-ihme/

Are Bill Gates’s Billions Distorting Public Health Data? The Nation Magazine thenation.com

@DrHenryEaly - Dr Henry Ealy

@P_McCulloughMD So you whip the public into a panic with a Hoax based upon outlandish predictions... You know you're ready to go because China & the US DoD is thumbs up, and Johns Hopkins University hosts Event 201... Who funded it? Oh yeah Bill Gates. https://centerforhealthsecurity.org/our-work/tabletop-exercises/event-201-pandemic-tabletop-exercise

Event 201 | Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security in partnership with the World Economic Forum and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation hosted Event 201, a high-level pandemic exercise on October 18, 2019, in New York, NY. centerforhealthsecurity.org

@DrHenryEaly - Dr Henry Ealy

@P_McCulloughMD At Event 201 you have... The World Bank WEF CIA US CDC Chinese CDC Nigeria CDC UN UPS Hotel Rep Airline Rep Harmaceutical Industry & J&J who made one of the shots... And Bill Gates https://www.weforum.org/press/2019/10/live-simulation-exercise-to-prepare-public-and-private-leaders-for-pandemic-response/

Live Simulation Exercise to Prepare Public and Private Leaders for Pandemic Response Kirsten Salyer, Public Engagement, Tel.: +41 79 265 8773; Email: kirsten.salyer@weforum.org weforum.org

@DrHenryEaly - Dr Henry Ealy

@P_McCulloughMD So it's just a 'coincidence' that Event 201 happens at JHU, which is always up to no good (Read The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks). Can you tell me why the CIA, China CDC, and reps from travel, shipping, hotels and even NBC TV need to be there? But wait...there's more...

@DrHenryEaly - Dr Henry Ealy

@P_McCulloughMD The 'good club' led by Bill Gates pushes the go button following Event 201 final simulation for pandemic tracking. SARS-CoV-2 is 'accidentally' released on purpose. A wet market gets blamed. The Great Barrington Declaration gets denounced... @DrJBhattacharya

@DrHenryEaly - Dr Henry Ealy

@P_McCulloughMD @DrJBhattacharya March 24, 2020 The CDC issues COVID Alert No 2 via the NVSS. Alert No 2 changes death cert recording but ONLY for COVID. Comorbidities that have always been in Part 1 are now moved to Part 2 and no longer counted as the cause of death... Fraudulently making COVID the cause.

@DrHenryEaly - Dr Henry Ealy

@P_McCulloughMD @DrJBhattacharya Remember... 95% of all supposed COVID deaths had on average 4 Comorbidities that would be considered the cause of death in all other situations except COVID. This is how the death counts that NBC pumped daily were fraudulently inflated by the CDC. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvss/coronavirus/Alert-2-New-ICD-code-introduced-for-COVID-19-deaths.pdf

@DrHenryEaly - Dr Henry Ealy

@P_McCulloughMD @DrJBhattacharya Can't have a pandemic without dead bodies... Also can't have a pandemic without an invisible boogieman... Or suppressing safe and effective treatments like Vitamin C, D, A, Zinc, Glutathione, Iodine, Ivermectin... Can't have a pandemic without stupid people...

@DrHenryEaly - Dr Henry Ealy

@P_McCulloughMD @DrJBhattacharya Make sure to check out @JohnBeaudoinSr 's incredible work on death certificate audits in Massachusetts... Jaw dropping. Hope he'll share a couple of links here.

@DrHenryEaly - Dr Henry Ealy

@P_McCulloughMD @DrJBhattacharya @JohnBeaudoinSr Here's what that CDC cooking of the death certificate books looks like in an example of one of the many ways they intentionally committed fraud... aka Willful Misconduct.

@DrHenryEaly - Dr Henry Ealy

@P_McCulloughMD @DrJBhattacharya @JohnBeaudoinSr Now the CDC needed cases... What should have been a small area between new cases each day and new hospitalizations was HUGE but in the US only. Indicating that a lot of Americans were getting sick, but not needing a hospital. Only...this was CDC fraud too..

@DrHenryEaly - Dr Henry Ealy

@P_McCulloughMD @DrJBhattacharya @JohnBeaudoinSr Here's Italy's New Cases, New Hospitalizations, New Deaths by day. Notice a much smaller area between the top line (New Cases) and the middle line (New Hospitalizations)... this is how all other countries were looking... but not the US... Why?

@DrHenryEaly - Dr Henry Ealy

@P_McCulloughMD @DrJBhattacharya @JohnBeaudoinSr I know this information inside and out. We fight to get this evidence to a grand jury because a grand jury can investigate all of what I'm saying to prove we're right and hand down indictments. So why was the US data so dramatically different and why was it fraud?

@DrHenryEaly - Dr Henry Ealy

@P_McCulloughMD @DrJBhattacharya @JohnBeaudoinSr All government agencies must follow the same rules according to the Administrative Procedures Act. https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/administrative_procedure_act

Administrative Procedure Act law.cornell.edu

@DrHenryEaly - Dr Henry Ealy

@P_McCulloughMD @DrJBhattacharya @JohnBeaudoinSr When making changes to how data is collected or analyzed... All government agencies must file proposed changes to the Federal Register. This launches federal oversight by the Office of Management & Budget and opens a mandatory public comment period. https://www.opm.gov/about-us/open-government/digital-government-strategy/fitara/paperwork-reduction-act-guide.pdf

@DrHenryEaly - Dr Henry Ealy

@P_McCulloughMD @DrJBhattacharya @JohnBeaudoinSr The proposed changes to data collection and analysis MUST adhere to the Information Quality Act which exists to prevent defrauding of the American people by a government agency. https://www.noaa.gov/sites/default/files/legacy/document/2021/Mar/IQA_Overview_7-30-10-FINAL.pdf

Page Not Found Error 404 We're sorry, these coordinates don't compute. Enter Search Terms Or visit these popular links: News & features Tools & resources About our agency noaa.gov

@DrHenryEaly - Dr Henry Ealy

@P_McCulloughMD @DrJBhattacharya @JohnBeaudoinSr In March & April of 2020 the CDC went rogue. They issued changes to how death certificate reporting was to be done but only for COVID... And WITHOUT reporting these proposed changes to the Federal Register for oversight and public comment! The CDC broke our laws!

@DrHenryEaly - Dr Henry Ealy

@P_McCulloughMD @DrJBhattacharya @JohnBeaudoinSr And the CDC would go even further with the help of the HHS. On March 26, 2020 The HHS ensured that hospitals would receive substantially higher reimbursements but only for COVID diagnoses via Medicare/Medicaid particularly for patients placed on ventilators.

@DrHenryEaly - Dr Henry Ealy

@P_McCulloughMD @DrJBhattacharya @JohnBeaudoinSr Remember that at this time hospitals could not perform elective surgeries or procedures and were losing money. So they needed a way to diagnose everything as COVID and gorge themselves at the medicare pig trough created by the HHS... Reenter the CDC...

@DrHenryEaly - Dr Henry Ealy

@P_McCulloughMD @DrJBhattacharya @JohnBeaudoinSr The CDC... filled with PhDs and the smartest people on the planet🙄 The CDC... with the ability to define what constitutes a COVID case The CDC... inexplicably outsources that authority to a non profit org funded by Bill Gates. They are called the CSTE.

@DrHenryEaly - Dr Henry Ealy

@P_McCulloughMD @DrJBhattacharya @JohnBeaudoinSr The CDC sends 7 subject matter experts including the infamous Tom Shimabakuro to the CSTE to draft a document clearly designed to defraud the American people... What was in this document? https://cdn.ymaws.com/www.cste.org/resource/resmgr/2020ps/Interim-20-ID-01_COVID-19.pdf

@DrHenryEaly - Dr Henry Ealy

@P_McCulloughMD @DrJBhattacharya @JohnBeaudoinSr In this document👆️ A single cough is enough for a white coat in a hospital to diagnose COVID!😤 We all know the PCR testing FRAUD... well, remember when you had to get a negative test before you could go back to work?

@DrHenryEaly - Dr Henry Ealy

@P_McCulloughMD @DrJBhattacharya @JohnBeaudoinSr Remember people being symptom free, getting a false positive because the FDA turned up the cycle thresholds... Remember those same people going from free testing site to free testing site... Remember how many times they tested positive searching for a negative test?

@DrHenryEaly - Dr Henry Ealy

@P_McCulloughMD @DrJBhattacharya @JohnBeaudoinSr Well, in this document authored by the Bill Gates CSTE with the help of the CDC there is an interesting section... How do we make sure the same person isn't counted inaccurately as a new case each time he tests positive? 'N/A Until More Virologic Data Available' https://t.co/vjA7wIllfK

@DrHenryEaly - Dr Henry Ealy

@P_McCulloughMD @DrJBhattacharya @JohnBeaudoinSr April 15, 2020 The CDC 'adopts' this paper from the Bill Gates CSTE. Again rogue, without reporting to the Federal Register thereby opening federal oversight and mandatory public comment. https://t.co/ZTCkxr8m0d

@DrHenryEaly - Dr Henry Ealy

@P_McCulloughMD @DrJBhattacharya @JohnBeaudoinSr The result? Guaranteed fraudulent COVID death counts which have been confirmed by Santa Clara, Alameda, @JohnBeaudoinSr and even Rachel Walensky CDC. Guaranteed fraudulent COVID case counts. Guaranteed fraudulent insurance billing. The theft of $4.5 Trillion from US taxpayers https://t.co/BVgwTHCilp

@DrHenryEaly - Dr Henry Ealy

And for what? The road to mRNA genetic infection tech. For profit murder. For profit altering of the human and microbiological genome. For profit governance by a non governmental organization funded primarily by Bill Gates so he can profit from his 'philanthropy'🙄 @RobertKennedyJr

@DrHenryEaly - Dr Henry Ealy

@P_McCulloughMD @DrJBhattacharya @JohnBeaudoinSr You see... this was all about launching Agenda '21. This was all about creating an endless line of pandemics they can blame on climate change. They create the problem in a lab and then offer us their solution from a lab. And it's foundation? FRAUD.

@DrHenryEaly - Dr Henry Ealy

@P_McCulloughMD @DrJBhattacharya @JohnBeaudoinSr I'm still blown away by the number of supposed freedom fighters out there that know what my team is doing and still won't visibly support us as we have supported them. If you can' support what we are doing then I call you a coward at this point. Damn shame...

@DrHenryEaly - Dr Henry Ealy

@P_McCulloughMD @DrJBhattacharya @JohnBeaudoinSr Glory goes to the Most High. I'm just here to do His work. Thank you to @IamBrookJackson @MendenhallFirm @rgvrunner01 @lifebiomedguru @Kevdjenkins1963 @RenzTom @naomirwolf @VigilantFox @OutLoudNews @standforhealth1 And many, many others who have supported us.❤️

@DrHenryEaly - Dr Henry Ealy

@P_McCulloughMD @DrJBhattacharya @JohnBeaudoinSr @IamBrookJackson @MendenhallFirm @rgvrunner01 @lifebiomedguru @Kevdjenkins1963 @RenzTom @naomirwolf @VigilantFox @OutLoudNews @standforhealth1 'I came to kick some ass and chew bubble gum... And I'm all out of bubble gum.' December 5th Let's GET IT ON!🔥 https://t.co/LHGJwVJbJO

@DrHenryEaly - Dr Henry Ealy

@P_McCulloughMD @DrJBhattacharya @JohnBeaudoinSr @IamBrookJackson @MendenhallFirm @rgvrunner01 @lifebiomedguru @Kevdjenkins1963 @RenzTom @naomirwolf @VigilantFox @OutLoudNews @standforhealth1 If you're injured by the damn shots... If you're pissed off and want some pay back... We did all of this for you!❤️ @HouseLyndsey @shdegaray73 @React19org @RealNotRare

@DrHenryEaly - Dr Henry Ealy

@P_McCulloughMD @DrJBhattacharya @JohnBeaudoinSr @IamBrookJackson @MendenhallFirm @rgvrunner01 @lifebiomedguru @Kevdjenkins1963 @RenzTom @naomirwolf @VigilantFox @OutLoudNews @standforhealth1 @HouseLyndsey @shdegaray73 @React19org @RealNotRare @PoliticalMoons2 @welcometheeagle @BrianOSheaSPI Can you add some more info to this thread for the people? Let them see it all.💫

@LetsGoBrando45 — Brandon Taylor Moore

Posted - November 27, 2023 at 5:53 PM

Saved - November 27, 2023 at 8:29 PM

@LetsGoBrando45 - Brandon Taylor Moore

Deaths before the vaccine and deaths after. Unless you’re retarded, case closed. ✅ No hyperbole intended. If you don’t see it, check your head. Something is very wrong. Source: John Hopkins University - Corona Virus Resource Centre. https://t.co/YyCy0Fkb36

@I_Am_JohnCullen — John Cullen

Posted - December 21, 2023 at 12:29 PM

Saved - December 21, 2023 at 1:59 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

Spain experienced a high number of deaths and few cases in the beginning, with peak deaths on April 2, 2020. There is uncertainty about whether the deaths in March and April were caused by SARS-COV2 infection. Influenza had been eradicated from Spain by April 1, 2020.

@I_Am_JohnCullen - John Cullen

Spain sure had a LOT of deaths and very few cases back in the beginning. In fact, peak deaths were April 2, 2020. Are you certain that the people that died in Spain in March and April, 2020 died from SARS-COV2 infection? How are you certain? https://t.co/O01m2Uvjei

@I_Am_JohnCullen - John Cullen

By April 1, 2020 Influenza had been eradicated from Spain, entriely. https://t.co/mQrcG8tU9y

@inkmequick — Mochaomhóg

Posted - January 25, 2024 at 6:44 PM

Saved - February 3, 2024 at 6:11 AM

@inkmequick - Mochaomhóg

@griptmedia I wonder why that would be? #ExcessDeaths https://t.co/ZIT951WECv

@TheRustler83 — Rustler

Posted - February 22, 2024 at 12:13 PM

Saved - February 23, 2024 at 7:30 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

National Records of Scotland have removed 5,000 excess deaths since the COVID-vaccine rollout, raising questions about what caused the excess and if it was related to the vaccines. The baseline mortality rate has also been artificially increased, which removes excess deaths and raises concerns about government accountability. Despite elevated mortality rates, politicians are denying the existence of excess deaths. The ONS has also changed the way excess deaths are calculated, removing 27,000 deaths since 2020. This raises suspicions about the harms of lockdown and the vaccine. The same trick is being played UK-wide. History is being rewritten, and those involved in COVID crimes are being rewarded. The truth is evident in age-standardized mortality rates, which show excess mortality across all age groups. Northern Ireland has also eliminated excess deaths by adjusting the baseline.

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

🚨🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿National Records of Scotland have today removed all of the #ExcessDeaths from 2023 Removing 5,000 excess deaths since the roll-out of the COVID-vaccine .. Why? What are they hiding? What caused the excess? Was it the vaccines? 1 of 2

Video Transcript AI Summary

The National Records of Scotland have revised excess death numbers for 2023, reducing them from 3,329 to 360. A total of 5,142 excess deaths have been removed over the pandemic, lowering the total from 19,500 to 14,400. They have changed their methodology, using a statistical model instead of a 5-year average, potentially hiding post-vaccine rollout excess deaths. The new method shows abnormal spikes in deaths in 2019 and 2022-2023. Questions arise about the cause of these extra deaths, with speculation about the vaccine's role. Translation: The National Records of Scotland have adjusted excess death figures for 2023, reducing them significantly. They have changed their calculation method, potentially concealing post-vaccine rollout excess deaths. Anomalies in the data raise questions about the cause of these additional deaths, including speculation about the vaccine's impact.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Alright, guys. The National Records of Scotland have today deleted all the excess deaths for 2023. This is in line with the new methodology set out this week by the ONS for calculating excess deaths. So for 2023, using the old method, we had 3,329 deaths excess deaths in Scotland last year. Using the new methodology, they've now reduced that to just 360 excess deaths, removing almost 3,000 excess deaths from the death count. Over the course of the pandemic, they've removed a total of 5,142 excess deaths, reducing the total excess from 19,500 down to 14,400. What they are doing now, guys, is they are hiding the excess deaths that have occurred after the vaccine rollout. So how have they done this? Well, traditionally, NRS and ONS used a 5 year rolling average for calculating their baselines. Now that wasn't without its flaws, but it's a standard process used all over the world. But what I've done now is they've banned the 5 year average and have replaced that with a statistical model, which brings in all kinds of variables that could be manipulated to increase the level of the baseline and in doing so, reduce the level of the excess. Now if you look at the the black dash line here as the old traditional 5 year average method. Now you can see it's rising steady as the death columns in blue here rise and fall. So it's tracking what was going on. But the new method is red line. You can see that it's abnormally high for some reason in 2019 before the pandemic and also spikes from 2022 to 2023 for no apparent reason. This is after the pandemic. Now remember, the World Health Organization declared the pandemic over in May 2023. So why in Scotland are deaths continuing to be high? Higher than pre pandemic levels by around 5000 to 6000 a year. What's causing these extra deaths? Is it the vaccine?

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

NRS just deleted 5,000 excess deaths in Scotland 2 of 2

Video Transcript AI Summary

The modelers adjust for population increase in Scotland due to low birth rates compared to death rates, resulting in a declining population. Net migration is the only factor maintaining population levels, with migrants generally under 40 years old. Despite this, deaths are rising while the population is falling, leading to speculation about the role of vaccines.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Now one thing the modelers will talk talk about is they're having to do this model to adjust for population increase. In green, you see the population level in Scotland over the last 5 years. That is almost static around 5,400,000 to 5,500,000. Now the population in Scotland is static because birth rates are currently lower than death rates. So there's less births than there is death, meaning the population is naturally in decline. And the only way population is increasing is through net migration. And that's the only way Scotland is maintaining its population at the moment. All of this is our fix. None of the migrants are coming in here are aging the population. Migrants will generally be under 40 years of age, so they're not putting strain on the deaths or the death figures. So why are our deaths continuing to rise when our natural population is falling? It's not the population. It's not aging. It's something else. Is it the vaccines?

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

The pre-pandemic 5-year average mortality was 57,000 deaths per year The NRS have now raised that baseline to 63,000 deaths per year +6,000 +10.5% This artificially increases expected deaths and removes excess deaths ..and with it questions to Government on #ExcessDeaths 3/

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

The population of Scotland has increased by just 0.2% from 2019 to 2023 That being the case, there is no justification to increase mortality rates by 10.5% We have also suffered 20,000 extra deaths of our elderly during the ‘pandemic’ meaning death rates should now be lower 4/

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

The ‘FIX’ is in …. Our politicians will now deny that there is any #ExcessDeath even though mortality rates remain elevated above pre-pandemic average by ~10% We need to raise awareness of this scam …5,000 deaths removed by the stroke of a pen…. END https://www.nrscotland.gov.uk/about-us/contact-us

Contact Us | National Records of Scotland National Records of Scotland nrscotland.gov.uk

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

Review of the ONS change in methodology for the whole of the UK🇬🇧

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

🚨The ONS announced they are changing the way #ExcessDeaths are calculated The new ‘Statistical Model’ method has removed 27,000 excess deaths in🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿&🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿since 2020 7,000 from 2020 20,000 from 2021-2023 Are they hiding the harms of lockdown & the vaccine? 1/https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/healthandsocialcare/causesofdeath/articles/estimatingexcessdeathsintheukmethodologychanges/february2024

Estimating excess deaths in the UK, methodology changes - Office for National Statistics Overview of a new method for estimating excess deaths across UK countries, and a comparison of estimates from the new and current methods. ons.gov.uk

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

Same trick being played UK wide by the ONS🇬🇧⬇️

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

"Every record has been destroyed or falsified, every book rewritten, every picture has been repainted, every statue and street building has been renamed, every date has been altered & the process is continuing day by day and minute by minute. History has stopped" George Orwell

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

Rewarding those for services to COVID crimes …. Previous Experience: “Producing the slides and graphics for the UK Covid-19 daily briefing”

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

The excess-death-.deniers will often claim that the 5YA is a poor baseline and that Age-standardised-mortality-rates (ASMR) are a better measure Here is the ASMR & excess-ASMR for 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 A clear signal that mortality is in excess, across all age groups The truth is like a lion

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

Northern Ireland showing the same ‘kick’ in baseline into 2023 - with ALL of their #ExcessDeaths eliminated by one keystroke …💻

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

For 2023, NISRA have now added an extra 1,000 deaths to the baseline, following the new ONS guidance This eliminates the 768 #ExcessDeaths for the year - diluting the high mortality levels still being experienced after the pandemic 2/ https://www.nisra.gov.uk/statistics/deaths/death-statistics

Death Statistics NISRA provisional death statistics are based on death registration information collected by the General Register Office. Information on the quality nisra.gov.uk

@TheRustler83 — Rustler

Posted - February 22, 2024 at 9:36 PM

Saved - February 23, 2024 at 7:30 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

Northern Ireland Statistics & Research Agency (NISRA) has adjusted their records, removing 2,000 excess deaths. The new baseline shows a negative excess of -286 deaths. NISRA added 1,000 deaths to the baseline based on new guidance, eliminating the previously reported excess deaths. The methodology used by NISRA and the Office for National Statistics (ONS) is being criticized for attributing the increase in death rates to changes in population rather than acknowledging excess deaths. Similar adjustments have been made in Scotland and England & Wales, raising questions about what is being hidden and the impact of lockdowns and vaccines.

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

Northern Ireland Statistics & Research Agency #NISRA have just deleted 2,000 #ExcessDeaths from their records In 2023, NI suffered 17,254 deaths 768 more than the 5YA +4.7% above average After raising the new baseline to 17,540, a negative excess of -286 is now reported 1/

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

For 2023, NISRA have now added an extra 1,000 deaths to the baseline, following the new ONS guidance This eliminates the 768 #ExcessDeaths for the year - diluting the high mortality levels still being experienced after the pandemic 2/ https://www.nisra.gov.uk/statistics/deaths/death-statistics

Death Statistics NISRA provisional death statistics are based on death registration information collected by the General Register Office. Information on the quality nisra.gov.uk

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

The new ONS/NISRA methodology claims the increase in death rates is due to changes in population From 2020 to 2023 the NI population has increased by just 0.8% The NEW baseline mortality rate has increased by 9% in the same period This model is FLAWED to hide excess deaths 3/

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

Same truck being played in Scotland🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿⬇️

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

🚨🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿National Records of Scotland have today removed all of the #ExcessDeaths from 2023 Removing 5,000 excess deaths since the roll-out of the COVID-vaccine .. Why? What are they hiding? What caused the excess? Was it the vaccines? 1 of 2

Video Transcript AI Summary

The National Records of Scotland revised excess deaths for 2023, reducing them from 3,329 to 360. They've removed 5,142 excess deaths since the pandemic began, lowering the total from 19,500 to 14,400. The new methodology uses a statistical model instead of a 5-year average, potentially hiding post-vaccine rollout excess deaths. The new method shows abnormal spikes in deaths in 2019 and after the pandemic. This raises questions about the cause of these extra deaths, with some speculating about the vaccine's role. Translation: The National Records of Scotland revised excess deaths for 2023, reducing them significantly. They've removed over 5,000 excess deaths since the pandemic began. The new method raises questions about the cause of these extra deaths, with some speculating about the vaccine's role.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Alright, guys. The National Records of Scotland have today deleted all the excess deaths for 2023. This is in line with the new methodology set out this week by the ONS for calculating excess deaths. So for 2023, using the old method, we had 3,329 deaths excess deaths in Scotland last year. Using the new methodology, they've now reduced that to just 360 excess deaths, removing almost 3,000 excess deaths from the death count. Over the course of the pandemic, they've removed a total of 5,142 excess deaths, reducing the total excess from 19,500 down to 14,400. What they are doing now, guys, is they are hiding the excess deaths that have occurred after the vaccine rollout. So how have they done this? Well, traditionally, NRS and ONS used a 5 year rolling average for calculating their baselines. Now that wasn't without its flaws, but it's a standard process used all over the world. But what I've done now is they've banned the 5 year average and have replaced that with a statistical model, which brings in all kinds of variables that could be manipulated to increase the level of the baseline and in doing so, reduce the level of the excess. Now if you look at the the black dash line here as the old traditional 5 year average method. Now you can see it's rising steady as the death columns in blue here rise and fall. So it's tracking what was going on. But the new method is red line. You can see that it's abnormally high for some reason in 2019 before the pandemic and also spikes from 2022 to 2023 for no apparent reason. This is after the pandemic. Now remember, the World Health Organization declared the pandemic over in May 2023. So why in Scotland are deaths continuing to be high? Higher than pre pandemic levels by around 5000 to 6000 a year. What's causing these extra deaths? Is it the vaccine?

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

England & Wales 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿🚛⬇️

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

🚨The ONS announced they are changing the way #ExcessDeaths are calculated The new ‘Statistical Model’ method has removed 27,000 excess deaths in🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿&🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿since 2020 7,000 from 2020 20,000 from 2021-2023 Are they hiding the harms of lockdown & the vaccine? 1/https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/healthandsocialcare/causesofdeath/articles/estimatingexcessdeathsintheukmethodologychanges/february2024

Estimating excess deaths in the UK, methodology changes - Office for National Statistics Overview of a new method for estimating excess deaths across UK countries, and a comparison of estimates from the new and current methods. ons.gov.uk

@Kevin_McKernan — Kevin McKernan

Posted - March 22, 2024 at 12:14 PM

Saved - December 8, 2024 at 12:49 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

I received a letter from @USMortality claiming I doxxed him, but he misspelled his own name, which is amusing. It seems he’s worried about his identity being revealed, yet he has no problem trying to get others fired. His name is public, so the doxxing claim is ridiculous. His previous work in Bioinformatics was careless, which reflects in his sloppy letters. Also, I've noticed that likes on this thread vanish whenever I criticize certain figures, which is curious.

@Kevin_McKernan - Kevin McKernan

.@USMortality is sending letters to my employer trying to claim I doxxed him but spelled his name wrong? That got a chuckle or two. But at least we know he’s the cancel culture type that got @MartinKulldorff fired. Stay away from this fraud.

@Kevin_McKernan - Kevin McKernan

I’m going to guess the reason he/it doesn’t want his name correctly spelled as it might risk his employment if people figured out who Ben M is. But he’s just fine sending in complaints to other people’s employers. Funny how that works.

@Kevin_McKernan - Kevin McKernan

Of course… His actual name is public so the doxxing claim is pure BS. https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1383894499701649413.html#google_vignette

Thread by @BenMarten on Thread Reader App Thread by @BenMarten: The German Merkel government is rolling out MASSIVE unconstitutional changes to the "Infectionprotectionslaw", here are the most critical changes: 1) Meeting with more than 1 other person in p...… threadreaderapp.com

@Kevin_McKernan - Kevin McKernan

So top secret! This doesn’t surprise me. His attempts at Bioinformatics were so blatantly lazy that I’m not surprised he sent in sloppy threat letters. https://t.co/ZsKTj7S0cO

@Kevin_McKernan - Kevin McKernan

Letter from Dr Anonymous to my employer. https://t.co/MaBVotWbwm

@Kevin_McKernan - Kevin McKernan

This thread has adopted a disappearing like feature. Notice your likes disappear. That only happens when I criticize agents like Drosten or Bustin.

@wolsned — DD Denslow 🇬🇧

Posted - March 30, 2024 at 6:50 AM

Saved - March 30, 2024 at 8:44 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

Since 2022, there have been more excess deaths in the UK than civilian deaths in World War II. The same goes for the USA, where excess deaths are ten times greater than losses in the Vietnam War. Surprisingly, the ONS has altered the way they record excess deaths, yet there is a lack of response or inquiry.

@wolsned - DD Denslow 🇬🇧

A quick reminder there have been more excess deaths since 2022 than UK civilians died during World War II. No questions, no investigation, a deafening silence. In the USA, excess deaths are ten times greater than total US losses during the Vietnam War. Now the ONS have changed the way the record excess deaths. And no one bats an eyelid.

@JimFergusonUK — Jim Ferguson

Posted - May 15, 2024 at 6:52 AM

Saved - May 16, 2024 at 2:14 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

The CDC has released new data revealing that 99% of reported "Covid deaths" were not caused by the virus. Only 1.7% of the recorded deaths in a recent week were directly caused by Covid. The majority of deaths labeled as Covid-related were actually due to other causes like cancer and heart disease. This admission from the CDC suggests that the number of lives lost directly to the virus is much lower than claimed.

@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson

CDC Faked 99% of Reported ‘Covid Deaths,’ Data Shows The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has just quietly published new data that reveals a staggering 99% of reported “Covid deaths” were not actually caused by the virus. Recent data from the CDC reveals a troubling statistic showing that most recorded fatalities that were blanket-blamed on Covid were actually caused by something else. According to the CDC’s Covid dashboard, just 1.7% of the 324 “Covid deaths” registered in the week ending August 19 had the coronavirus as the primary cause of death. Alarmingly, the vast majority of people who were labeled as so-called “Covid deaths” actually died of other causes such as cancer and heart disease. As Slay News has previously reported, other studies have found that cancers and heart-related deaths have been soaring in the past couple of years. Separate data from the agency shows that, so far in August, the largest cause of death in the U.S. has been cancer, followed by heart disease. This latest admission from the CDC means that only a fraction of the claimed number of American lives are being lost directly to the virus each week. According to the CDC’s own data, 99 percent of “Covid deaths” have been faked. The primary or underlying cause of death is the disease, situation, or event that initiated the chain of events directly resulting in death, as http://earth.com notes. https://slaynews.com/news/cdc-faked-99-reported-covid-deaths-data-shows/

Earth and Environmental News, Videos and Images At Earth.com, our goal is to provide the internet with a homepage for anything and everything about our planet Earth and the environment. earth.com

CDC Faked 99% of Reported 'Covid Deaths,' Data Shows - Slay News The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has just quietly published new data that reveals a staggering 99% of reported "Covid deaths" were not actually caused by the virus. slaynews.com

@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson

Exclusive Breaking: The Centres for Disease Control and prevention (CDC) in the United States carried out Fraud. They changed the CDC Historical Data relating to Pneumonia and Influenza columns and lied about the real causes of death as it related to Covid. John Beaudoin is an electrical engineer who conducted up to 200 million dollar deals with Raytheon and Lockheed Martin and dealt with Intel in At and T and was heavily involved with economics, Finance and Law and makes explosive claims. Similar accusations of coverups of data are also being made in the UK with the Office of National Statistics (ONS) Every death was being attributed to Covid which was also a complete fraud and done to make people believe that the Covid pandemic was much more severe than it was in order to terrify people into taking the mRNA experimental gene therapies wrongly called Covid Vaccines. "I guess ill break this news on your show right now right here...the category of heart disease, everything is tracked by IDC10 codes for your audience and imagine a code of I4 that has to do with the heart, and that I46 is within that I4 code" "if I46 being cardiac arrest dominates the entire I4 tune to about 70-80% of the deaths within I4, myocarditis, myocardial infarctions, heart attacks, venular failures then all the other stuff is 20-25%" " Cardiac Arrest alone is the biggest one " Massachusetts is the seat of great evil. Of course there are good and great people there but in this city sits the epitome of globalist and Pharmacological power and its not a good power. Moderna's Headquarters is in Massachusetts. Pfizer R+D is also here. John Beaudoin has assembled an incredible amount of data in incredible detail of all those affected by the Covid Vaccinations. There was a huge amount of respiratory illness. Was this all part of a concerted attempt to depopulate much of the worlds population? @JohnBeaudoinSr #USA #CDC Rumble channels: viaveravita JohnBeaudoinSr http://ViaVeraVita.com Facebook John Paul Beaudoin Sr.

Video Transcript AI Summary

In this video, Jim Ferguson interviews John Baldwin, an engineer and researcher, about the CDC memorandum and the alleged fraud committed by the CDC. Baldwin discusses how he analyzed death certificates in Massachusetts and Minnesota and found that the CDC had committed massive amounts of fraud by not coding vaccine-related deaths properly. He also highlights the shift in causes of death from respiratory to circulatory issues and the increase in blood-related cancers. Baldwin suggests that the motive behind the fraud is a global communist takeover and a population reduction agenda. He emphasizes the importance of local action and faith in God as a way out of the current situation.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Well, thanks so much indeed for joining the channel. My name is Jim Ferguson. I've got a fantastic guest. His name is John Baldwin. John, it's nice to see you. How are you? Speaker 1: Very well, Jim, and it's great to meet you. I don't talk to people across the water there very much, so I appreciate, having the opportunity to address your your audience over there. Speaker 0: Well, John, it's a pleasure. You know, I'm I'm I'm I'm con connected to a lot of people, as you say, across the pond. I'm a magnificent people, and I'm delighted to to to meet you as well. So just because you haven't been on the channel before, would you just say a little bit who you are, where you're based located, and and what you you actually do, please, Speaker 1: John. Sure. My education is in electrical engineering, and my career was in that as well. However, I I never really did design work. I grew up in Connecticut, but I live in Massachusetts now and have since 1988. I was born in 64. I'm gonna be 60 for people doing math. So in electrical engineering, I was in a capacity of, started out and just you'd call it sales of semiconductor chips, But then it became, putting large contracts together. As you get older, you know, they they become seasoned. They put 40 $1,000 in training, into me, how to speak, you know, public speaking, negotiations, things that are really important to maximize the profitability of a contract in the area of, you know, in software, it's 20 dollars contract is kind of like a $200,000,000 contract in hardware because there's no cost of goods sold. So, that's the level of deals I was doing with Raytheon and Lockheed Martin and Intel and AT and T. I put together teams of engineers that would call on them. So the skills to speak to people, understanding finance, accounting, contract law, you know, everything. How to how to manipulate people if you wanna call it that. But really, it's understanding what's important to the the recipient of your information. It doesn't matter what I'm trying to say and what I'm trying to sell. I need to bring value to the person listening to me. And so I look at everything through the lens of, economic value. And what am I bringing to the party? Why does somebody wanna listen to me? If I'm doing the same kind of analysis somebody else is doing and they have a PhD and they've been doing it for 30 years, Why am I gonna do that? So I went off and did something different. So my background, you know, I'm an engineer, but most of my career was in sales and marketing and very large contracts. And I understand I also have an MBA, so economics, finance, law. I went to law school for a year. They threw me out because I wouldn't get the vaccine. I I went at 56 years old. I'll probably never be a lawyer because, you know, I'm gonna be 60, and what's the point now? But, Speaker 0: Well, you know, they as they say, it's never too late to start. But, I mean, you you you've got you know, you're quite a strong minded character. You've also got a great channel, not just on Twitter, but on Rumble as well. We'll put the links into that because I think people are gonna be pretty interested to hear what you're gonna be talking about. So let me ask you. Tell me a little bit about the CDC memorandum, please, John. Speaker 1: Sure. I started out I guess guess you'd say the prototypes for it was the Vermont memorandum and the Minnesota memorandum. And what those are is it's, it's a legal brief or, it's a memorandum. It's a notice of, criminal liability. So once once somebody knows something and they have a legal duty to act, and these are all legal terms. Right? No notification and notice as part of agency law. Once they're notified, they can't unknow it. And if they have a legal duty to act, then they have to act on the information, else the inaction is the crime. Okay? So, imagine if you saw a 7 year old boy drowning, and he he before he goes under, he says, kick that life preserver into the water for me. And you look at him and like, I don't feel like it. You just sit there, grab some popcorn, and watch him drown. You're not, liable for murder unless if you're an immediate family member, not a distant cousin, unless the cousin lives with the boy, then it's a close connection. If you are a fireman or, a paramedic, if you're if you had training as a lifeguard at 16 years old. So those are all cases in which you have a legal duty to act to save that boy, and your inaction would be murder. And so what I'm what I'm drawing here is a legal analysis of what is happening through facts in the CDC memorandum. And the facts are about a 100 and it's a 170 enumerated paragraphs. 1 through, you know, 172. And each paragraph is the death of a person with record numbers, death records, correlated to VAERS reports sometimes. Sometimes there's, a paper written a research paper written about somebody specifically where I know who it was the paper was about and I have their death record. And in court, putting all this together and then doing a legal analysis, I can show that the CDC committed massive amounts of fraud. In fact, I'll tell you one one case, as an example. So, my friend Aaron Hertzberg in New York City wrote an article that was picked up by Brownstone Institute, and that went out to, you know, millions of people. And it went viral. And that was the CDC committed data fraud, by not coding the death certificates that actually use the words vaccine and vaccination as a cause of death on the death certificates in Minnesota. They coded the first three with y59.0, which is viral vaccines. That is the code that is used for death by vaccines. We can get into a little bit of other stuff later. And the codes are international codes used. So so why is this important? Well, Greg Piper, so the article said CDC committed data fraud by not by by hiding the vaccine deaths and not coding them. The first three were coded. The next 6 were not. So it gets picked up. Greg Piper from Just the News wrote to the CDC via email to their public relations and asked, what do you say about this article? Are you guys committing data fraud by omitting vaccine as a cause of death? It's the way that Kristin Nordlund, and this is all in the CDC memorandum, it's it's this book right here, Kristin Nordlund from the CDC responded by email saying the article is incorrect. It says vaccination, not vaccine, and a vaccination is not a vaccine or cause of death. Does it make any sense? No, of course it doesn't. And she went on to say that it doesn't say side effect of or adverse effect of in the 6 that are not coded. So what she did was she tailored her excuse to the Minnesota deaths around the words vaccine versus vaccination, which is ridiculous on its face. And then the adverse effect of the side effect of what she did not know. And I have this again, it's in the CDC memorandum. What she did not know is that we have the Massachusetts death certificates. And Solomon Kisito died on January 16, 2021, in the very first few weeks of the vaccination. And on his death certificate, it says, acute bronchopneumonia in a setting of thrombocytopenia in a person recently vaccinated. It said excuse me. Vaccination. So it says vaccination, not vaccine. It does not say side effect of. It does not say adverse effect of, and it was coded with WIP 59.0, making her excuse to Greg Piper an absolute fraud and lie on top of all the other fraud that the CDC has been committing. I now have a third state. And guess what? They coded the first one and and by the way, in Massachusetts, Solomons was coded with y 59.0. The next 9 were not. The next 9. And people died 5 minutes after vaccination, hours after vaccination. 1 in Minnesota was 7 hours after, 1 was 10 hours after from heart related issues. The day of, the day after, 2 days after, all from heart issues. Clearly vaccine deaths, they omitted the so they coded the first three in Minnesota, not the next 6. They coded the first one in Massachusetts, not the next 9. And now I have a third state, they coded the first one and not the next 3 that mentioned vaccine or vaccination. It's absolute fraud, and it leads to murder because once they've been served and they have been served with the CDC memorandum, an official copy, not the publication, this is a published version you can buy, but the, the version that went to them, the directors of the CDC, FDA, and NIH, they went certified in mail, return receipt requested. They have received it. And 13 of of their excuse me, 13 of their deputy directors. So now that they're unnoticed and they've been notified, they have a legal duty to act on information and belief the public is in imminent danger of harm from these vaccines, which I proved throughout the CDC memorandum with their official data. There's nothing like this in the world. Speaker 0: Wow. No. I mean, the the the terminology CDC, we're talking about the Centers For Disease Control, aren't we? Yeah. Speaker 1: And and prevention, don't forget that. Disease Centers For Disease Control Prevention, but they're actually causing it, not preventing it. Speaker 0: Now, I mean, in terms of these these excess deaths, and and this is this is really pretty pretty explosive stuff. I mean, we are seeing in the UK, for example and and I've I've I'm speaking to people all around the world on a regular basis. And some of them are scientists. Some of them are professors. Some of them are are experts in their own field. And they're seeing an explosion in excess deaths, not just deaths, but all cause mortality. But also, well, it's not a medical term, but, terrible cancers are are which which is more of a medical term, early onset cancers. They're seeing thrombosis in people's eyes. They're seeing dermatological conditions exploding, pericarditis, myocarditis, and and it's all in these highly vaccinated countries. What is is currently the situation where you're based and where you're located in the states as far as excess deaths are concerned? And is there still a wall of silence over there for those or with those who should be talking about it? Because there is certainly in other countries I'm aware of, Joe. Speaker 1: Yeah. People are definitely silenced. You know, it it's hard for me to say, humbly. I I can't. I have a hard time saying this, but the data I have is the best in the world. There's there's no question about it. You you can look at all cause mortality, which is where I was 4 years ago looking at all cause mortality. But when the big names and the professors and all are a lot smarter than I am pick it up, what's the point in me doing it? So I look for things that people don't have. And so that's why I got these, 1,400,000 unredacted, nonredacted death certificates. I have people's first, middle, and last names, their parents' names, where the parents are from, their burial plot, all the causes of death, the death certifier, the death certifier's office address. I have 3 15 different fields for a single decedent times 60,000 deaths per year in Massachusetts and about 54,000 a year in Minnesota. Plus, I have a 3rd state now. Excuse me. There's nothing like it in the world. And what I have seen is and you can look at my articles online from 2 years ago. I showed that everything shifted from respiratory excess. So you go get let's get specific, not just talking about all cause. It shifted from respiratory access in 2020, the year of COVID, which was very big in Massachusetts, the biggest wave was only, 9 weeks long, mid March to mid June. And there's a reason for that. But they purportedly said all these people died from COVID, and it was respiratory, more more respiratory excess. In 21, all of a sudden on a year boundary, and this is the thesis of of my, my book, the real CDC, which means which is naughty dog in French. The the the d is lowercase. So it goes. But that that book, has the the thesis is the symptom spectrum profile, that is the causes of death across society, changed on a year boundary from respiratory in 2020 to circulatory in 21, and it continued into 22 and 23. And when I say circulatory, I include the blood. Everything's about the blood. So you have, like you mentioned, thrombocytopenia is very high. Very high. Yep. Cardiac arrest, that that's a whole animal I have to write a paper on. It's a systemic problem in the entire coding system from the WHO. I guess I'll break this news on your show right here. The the the category of heart disease, everything is tracked by ICD 10 codes for your audience. And imagine a code of I 4 that has to do with the heart, and that I 46 is within that I 4 code. Right? It's it's a subset of the I fours. And if if I 46 being cardiac arrest dominates the entire I fours to the tune of about 70 to 80% of the deaths within I fours, so you get your myocarditis and all your heart myocardial infarctions, your heart attacks, your left ventricle failures. All the other stuff is 20 to 25% of that category, and cardiac arrest alone is the biggest one. Now what does cardiac arrest mean? It means the heart stopped. That that is literally what it means. And many, death certifiers write cardiac arrest because it's the last thing that happens before you die. So you die from pneumonia, you have cardiac arrest. You you get in an accident and, you know, you rupture your aorta, and maybe you live a few hours, make it to the, to the emergency room to the hospital, the last thing that happens is your heart stops. Did you have a heart problem? If you were in an accident or if you died from pneumonia, no. So the entire world for the last several decades has been relying upon a category called heart disease that if you look at the problem from a systemic point of view, and I look at everything from a whole whole systems, right, the WHO creates the codes. The CDC adopts a subset. And what I'm telling you is you have to look regionally at all the codes. You can't look at the United States as a whole. And what's been happening is you have regional differences through custom and practice by the medical examiners where, you you can't the data is confounded. You can't say, oh, heart disease is rising. You don't know that because something that has nothing to do with the heart dominates the heart disease category, if that makes any sense. Yep. So back back to the blood, and the cancers. So cancers have risen. The first cancers that rose had to do with the blood. K. So where is your blood made? It's made in lymph and marrow. Your lymph makes white cells. Your marrow makes red, whites, and platelets, thrombocytes, erythrocytes, and all the leukocytes and lymphocytes, the white types. And and that's where the cancer rose. In fact, secondary malignant neoplasm of lymph nodes, lymph nodes in Massachusetts was 258% of normal in 2022. And it was rising, and it it hit for a half year. I only had the half year at that time. It was 400% of normal. Four times normal in a single category in a single state. It's crazy. That's Speaker 0: that that is crazy. Speaker 1: Yeah. And and the graphs that I have, there's there's nothing like it in the world. And that's why Kevin McBurnan refers to, to my work. What's interesting is the same cancers don't show up in Minnesota. And that's where the custom and practice the words that are written. So the the people in the offices in Massachusetts and 1300 miles away, Minnesota, okay, we're we're not close. They write different words on the death certificates which get coded differently. And so bone and articular cartilage, c 41, is different from bone and bone marrow cancer, which is C79 that gets coded by the CDC. And is it the same manifestation of a an ailment within the human body? Is it the same thing happening in both places, but because they write different words like sarcoma in one place and something else in the other, that it appears different, and therefore the data is all confounded. But guess what? Bone and articular cartilage is very high in Minnesota. So, yeah, I've seen I'll stop now, but, you know, I can talk forever about a lot. Speaker 0: Is it is it the case no. No. I think it's very, very important, very detailed information that you come across with here. Now is this an attempt to sort of try to obfuscate what's actually happening by using different codings, do you think? Speaker 1: That is happening. A lot of it's organic in just the way they write these things down. They tried to centralize the process by coming up with a common coding system. And what ended up happening is you have different variations and different cultures in the office as to what they write down. They would rather write AFib down in Minnesota and they would rather write cardiac, cardiopulmonary arrest in Massachusetts. Now that's, that's not on purpose. That's just how it organically happened. But but they are, so the the records go to the CDC. We have 50 states. Right? And that's a lot of people, 330 something million. When people die, the the states fill out the death certificates, but they send those with the PROs, the English words on the death certificates in parts 1 and 2 that goes to the CDC. The CDC is now a central point of failure, if you will. And the software they use is called Transacts and Acme. The links are are in my books. And they run it through the software, and the software generates the codes. And, there's some manual intervention for codes that let's say something went through and it it didn't get picked up, because the medical examiner could write, you know, the dog ate the cat who, had a disease, and then the dog was petted by somebody. There's no code for that. So somebody will manually intervene. But with the example of the Y59, which means viral vaccines I mentioned earlier, It gets put through their system, and it's an automated system. So for the ones I mentioned before that don't have the Wi Fi 9, yes, they absolutely committed fraud because they either turned the software off or they deleted the codes. That's what's so criminal. Speaker 0: That that that that is. Yeah. Absolutely. I mean, it's it's a big allegation for for the CDC to be accused of outright fraud. And, obviously, it's it's a very serious charge. Now I want to go back to something just be because it's a first time guest, and you you've you've got a great knowledge about things, especially in relation to the work that you're involved in. When was it that you first, because I'm always keen to to to hear this. What when when did you realize there's something just not right here? I mean, at at what what point did you you realize there was something wrong here? Speaker 1: Yeah. So, I mean, again, this is in my my book, this book. It starts out on Saint Patrick's Day, which was March 17, 2020. I was in a bar and, had a beer in my hand. And I'm looking around, and they're talking about this stuff on the news. I'm like, I'm getting nervous because people are getting close to me. I don't wanna get sick. I used to get sick all through my twenties until I stopped shaking hands with people in sales calls. I made any excuse in the world that I didn't get sick for 10 years. I go wash my hands right away. It's all about shaking hands, everything. But, anyway, yeah, the the, I I left my beer, which if anybody knows me, I'm not gonna leave the beer. Right? So I left my beer and I walked out of the bar. And I went home and I sat on the couch, which I was on the couch for for a couple of years because I had lost my son in 2018, and I I wasn't social. I barely went out. For me to go out Saint Patrick's Day was big. I was really depressed back then, and still am, but not not like that. Not like, you know, no job sitting on the couch for a couple of years. So, my my middle son, I lost my oldest boy in a motorcycle accident. But my middle son said, dad, this this is all b s, all this COVID stuff. And that was, you know, that was March. So I said, no, Charlie, I have to take it seriously. Even though in the back of my mind, I thought it was kind of BS. So I looked at the, New York City public health data, which was the best data in the world at the time. They purportedly had the most deaths and cases. Everything was going sky high. And I looked at their data and I found and, that, no no healthy person, not even 92 years old, was dying from this disease. Everybody was obese or diabetic. Every I go go and look at that data from March late March and, early April, and you'll you'll find what I'm saying. But then I looked into the CDC data. Here's what happened. I I I didn't download the file. I used it online, and I found that there was an error in their spreadsheet for the 2014 through 2018 data. And they it was in the pneumonia and influenza category where the numbers didn't add up. There's pneumonia, influenza, then there's pneumonia and influenza. And then there's and there's all caps. And when I looked at it, I was like, these these numbers, there's something wrong here. So I wrote to the keeper of the record, the keeper of that file, because that file was making 2020 look like there were a lot of deaths in those categories, when it had COVID on the 2019 and 2020 data. Not in 2019, but it was in the 2020 data. But that file comes together with 2019 2020 back then. So, I wrote to the keeper of the the data. There's an email online and for every file and, didn't write back, but the file disappeared for 36 hours. And when the file came back, it wasn't the math that changed. It wasn't the calculation. They changed the data. And so within the answer to your simple question, sorry I went on so long, is I knew within a week or 2 because that's when I downloaded the CDC data and they changed historical data, which I cannot now prove because I don't have the files. They changed historical data, and I just just from an email from a guy in Massachusetts. Like, how can you do that? So I knew the whole thing must be corrupt because they just change data whenever they want from 2014 through 2018. Speaker 0: And and what sort of data was it that they actually did change, John? Speaker 1: They it was the pneumonia and influenza and then the pneumonia and influenza columns. That's all I can remember because it's 4 years ago. Yeah. Yeah. I couldn't even remember 2 years ago, but I just I just can tell you that that that's what set me off. And that's Speaker 0: what I what got you? Speaker 1: Yeah. I wrote 11 papers in May June and, papers that, you know, nobody else was doing, you know, about schools and whether they should open up and and about, people were purporting that, the American, the the black demographic was getting killed by COVID far more. And I was like, that that's not true. That's because, yeah, they're 13% of the US population, but that's not where COVID is. You you can't count all the people in the Dakotas and Montana and Wyoming and everything else and throw them in the pool. If you went to New York City, I looked at the 5 boroughs of New York, Cook County, Illinois, which is Chicago, the northern counties of New Jersey and Massachusetts, a bunch of urban places. And in every single one, there was no proof that blacks were having, bad outcomes from COVID any more than anybody else. The per the percentage of them in society was just roughly the same percentage of them dying from COVID. And those are the kinds of things I did. Speaker 0: I mean, it was the same narrative in the UK. They're often referred to as BAME, b a m e, but sort of mixed race or blacks. And they were sort of saying exactly the same thing, saying that they were more vulnerable than others. And so we've seen there the CDC and the failures there, the fraud of it. In terms of your system, because, I mean, you've collated a vast amount of of data. I mean, how on earth did you manage to get so much data there? Because, I mean, this is must have been like a a full time occupation for you, is it? Speaker 1: Yeah. I mean, I don't work, so this is what I do now. But it it it helps with the depression from losing losing my son. Oh, you know, just let me wrap up the fraud a little bit. Speaker 0: Sure. Speaker 1: Well, we get into Massachusetts later. Basically, accidental deaths, fentanyl overdoses, blunt force trauma to the head, blunt force trauma to the torso, COVID, COVID, COVID, COVID. I proved it. You got 100 of Speaker 0: them. It's Speaker 1: all been it's been a lot of lives. And then they if they're willing to put accidental deaths as COVID deaths, what do you think they're willing to do for 8595 year olds who die from a heart attack? Speaker 0: Absolutely. COVID COVID. Speaker 1: COVID. COVID. COVID. COVID. It's all it's all fraud. And I interviewed a medical examiner for 3 and a half hours and and reviewed hundreds of death certificates with him. And, yeah. And he told me what they did. And, it's massive amounts of fraud. They didn't do their jobs. They didn't go to the office because they're afraid his his counterparts, his peers, were afraid of catching COVID from dead bodies, which is ridiculous because dead bodies don't breathe. It's it's a respiratory virus. Just use gloves. You're all set. And they didn't do imaging. They didn't do blood labs. They didn't do tissue samples. They just called up the old folks home and said, what happened? Well, she's 95, and, she was coughing and died. Okay. COVID. COVID. COVID. Everything's COVID. Speaker 0: This is fascinating, John, because, I mean, this is we're talking about the the the Center For Disease Control and Prevention in the United States. But the same and the CDC is not a British organization. It's purely American. But here in the UK, everything was a COVID death. There's a similar pattern going on here. It's not just the CDC in America. This was happening in the UK. This was also happening in other places in New Zealand and Australia and Europe. Everything was a COVID death. In fact, they thought it was a big mystery that the flu just had suddenly disappeared. I remember the headlines. Well, there's no flu. Absolutely no flu. The flu has gone, but they could never say where the flu had gone. I mean, was that the case in in the states as well that the flu has mysteriously disappeared? Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah. It it it only accounts for about 8% of the COVID deaths, though, even if you take a 100% of the worst flu year in the last 30 years. But, yes, it is part of it. It's one of the little slices. They took the flu deaths. They took the car accident, the motorcycle accidents. They took the fentanyl overdoses. They took the old people falling down the stairs. COVID every by the time you add it all up, it's a massive amount of fraud to the tune of probably 90% of the purported COVID deaths are fraud. And you know what? I just realized I didn't answer your question on the system. So, yeah, I I got the, 420,000 deaths death records originally, and then now I have over 500,000 from Massachusetts, another set from Minnesota, and a third state I just got, which I will announce probably in about a month when I get some preliminary studies done. What I did was I started out investigationally trying to figure out what's going on. And as I started writing code in the spreadsheets, I did it all in spreadsheets, I ended up with about 30 spreadsheets all calling each other and creating graphs and linking such that I type in one cause of death code, and it takes about 20 minutes for the whole system to spew out all the graphs and data and tables, that I created. It was a nice system. But now we got that 20 minutes down to 15 seconds in the overall process using software curriculum language that a friend, in Idaho coded. So he coded it up. And now I can do 3 states all at once. I could do mixed causes. I can do multiple variables. It's now a very nice system. And and the system itself that I put together as as one guy or with with the other with a friend who coded it, You know, it's better than anything that the United States has in either the CDC, FDA, NIH, or any state public health department, and they that represents about 250,000 public employees. They don't have anything close to what I have. What I have can not only be an early warning system. Yeah. So imagine if you will, somebody gets staphylococcus aureus bacterial pneumonia and dies. And there's 5 of them all around Massachusetts at different hospitals. As my system would be linked, you you would know right away, the doctors don't have to all talk to each other to figure this out. Right? The system finds the anomalies. What is an anomalous occurrence of data? Whether it's a cause of death, an age of death, or whatever. If there's a bus accident, a bunch of kids die, you know what it is. But if people are dying desperately in in geography, my system can find that. It's an early warning system. It's also an investigational tool. It'll find an anomaly 29 years ago in 2 or 3 towns, zip codes, we say, maybe b cell lymphocytic leukemia 29 years ago in these three places. Well, guess what? They had the same water supply. Let's look at the water the history. Oh, maybe it's like nickel or cadmium or something in the water that's causing the b cell lymphocytic leukemia. This is the intelligence of my system. And if you apply AI, artificial intelligence algorithms to it, basically, Monte Carlo sweeps, I'll I'll I'll stop talking about the system and just say, it's better than anything 250,000 employees have created. You know, that that's what It Speaker 0: certainly sounds like it. I mean, is is this something that you've approached the authorities with to say, hey, look, I've built this, this is what it can do. Have you done anything like that or is it more sort of an open source type, system you're building here? Other people that will be watching this might be very interested in it. I mean, can they can they access this, for example? Speaker 1: You know, my my dealings with the government is more adversarial than than that. You know, that's I should really offer that to the governments, every state. I have offered to Florida and a few other states to audit their public health data. Just give me 2 weeks, walk me in a room, I'll sign an NDA nondisclosure agreement, and within 2 weeks I'll solve this entire thing. You give me the immunization information registry, correlate it with both death certificate database and Medicare and Medicaid or whatever, and this is over. Jim, we we could end this in a week in a week. One man week. Everything works. Speaker 0: From the just just from inputting the the data. Yep. Yep. Well, Speaker 1: let me sitting on all this data. Sorry. Speaker 0: Right. Well, let's let's have a think about that. I mean, why are they sitting on all this data? What what is their motivation for doing that? You'd think they would be jumping at something like this, wouldn't you, in the in the normal world? Speaker 1: Yeah. No. It well, yeah, your normal world's different because over here, you know, I live in Massachusetts. It's extremely corrupt. And, Massachusetts is the center of all this stuff. That they're they don't wanna know because it would hurt the bottom line. I'll I'll just I'll get into Massachusetts right now if that's okay. Speaker 0: Of course. Yeah. Speaker 1: Okay. So when I say Massachusetts is the center of the world for COVID stuff, I don't I'm not just saying it because I live here. Massachusetts has 600 pharmaceutical ecosystem companies with $47,000,000,000 in venture capital financing behind them. They have 50 companies over $100,000,000 a year in revenue in pharma. They have 10 companies over a $1,000,000,000 a year in revenue in pharma. Moderna's headquarters and R and D is in Massachusetts. Pfizer's R&D and manufacturing for their, gene drug therapy, they call a vaccine, is in Massachusetts. Rochelle Walensky, former CDC director is from Massachusetts. My congressman in the United States House of Representatives is Jake Auchincloss. His father, Hugh Auchincloss, worked for couple decades as the number 2 man in the National Institute For Allergy and Infectious Diseases. Massachusetts is the center of all of this. And if you were to look at a time slice when everybody was the most afraid on July 27, 2020, I I tracked all the sovereigns in the world that are 3,000,000 people or more with each US state being a sovereign. So any state that had more than 3,000,000 people and any nation in the world with more than 3,000,000 people, I tracked them every month on 27th for a year. And in that first wave of COVID when everybody was so scared, the top three sovereigns in the world were New York, New Jersey, and Massachusetts with Belgium a distant fourth. Now people talk about the corruption of Belgium. Okay. I'm not a European, but I I believe it, given what's there. But, they were a distant fourth. Massachusetts was 50% more. So a virus purportedly starts in China. Right? And halfway around the world, the 3 states with the most to gain because New York City as Wall Street, which is where BlackRock and all the all the institutional investors in pharma live, and work. And Northern New Jersey is a suburb of New York, basically. That's where they all live, very rich area. So, the the 3 places with the most gain were had the the most purported COVID deaths in the world by far after the first wave. Speaker 0: Now Wow. That Speaker 1: and I told you all the finances involved. Speaker 0: Yeah. Speaker 1: There's there's nowhere Speaker 0: Is it is it if I was, is it Ottingklok or or the name of the chap that's in the senate? Speaker 1: Yeah. Auchin Auchincloss, a u c Speaker 0: a Auchincloss. Speaker 1: L o s s. Yeah. Speaker 0: Auchincloss. Democrat, republican, or independent? Speaker 1: I I don't know. It it doesn't matter. I'm sure he's democrat, but oh, you mean my congressman? Absolutely a democrat. Sorry. I thought you were talking about the debt. No. No. The sun is absolutely I mean, you can't get elected as a Republican in Massachusetts. Speaker 0: I'm I'm not so familiar with states and and and the different, political frameworks. So well, I have to say I was over in the states. Towards the end of last year, I was across 8 different states. I see the speaking engagement at Sundar. But I was in I was in cattle country. I was in North Dakota and ended up there in in in Alabama and and a few other states in between. But but it was great, but it was also farming people and and ranchers and people like that that I was speaking to. So not they were they were like the flyover states. You know? They weren't they weren't democrat states. Speaker 1: They're good good people. They're good I'm behind all of them here in Massachusetts, to give you an idea. It's it's the most, we used to call it liberal. I say illiberal because they're so against freedom. But, yeah, most most in the United States. I mean, it's not it's not even California isn't even close to Massachusetts. Speaker 0: Really? Is that is that right? I would have I would have thought California would have been the the sort of number 1, but that's not the case now in Massachusetts. Speaker 1: In fact, when the the the 12 to 15 year olds were getting jabbed Yeah. California was 45% of the 12 to 15 year olds, and, or was it 5 to 12? Anyway, it was kids. Massachusetts was 67%. That's far more than 45 percent in California. It was Vermont, Maine, Rhode Island, and Massachusetts, all, you know, 4 New England states. It's ridiculous. They'll do anything that the Deep Blue cult tells them to do. It it's a cult. It's it's not a Yeah. Speaker 0: It's crazy. I mean, let let me ask you then, just because we've we've covered a lot of very detailed stuff in this, but just taking us sort of a step back, just just just maybe slightly further back, what is what what, in your opinion, has happened here? What what's what what is this really all about, do you think? Speaker 1: Well, depends on the level of person you're you're talking about. Some people want to make money in the pharma thing and sell drugs, but actually the people who are really controlling us at the highest levels that we don't know their names. Know, people wanna say the banking families or the the new world order or, you know, all that stuff. They threw the vaccine market under the bus. They knew that doing this would kill a lot of people, and they knew that people would look around and say, you know what? I'm not taking the vaccine again. I don't know about you, but my I'm gonna be 60, and my friends who took the vaccine for the last 20 years, the flu vaccine. Okay? Every year, I'll get the flu vaccine. I'm like, I'm never getting that thing. They got it for 20 years. He's never gonna get one again. They're never gonna get it again. There are people that religiously got vaccines all the time. They're never gonna get another vaccine. They threw the entire market under the bus to install, you know, what we have now in the United States for leadership, if you want to call it that. It's really just a global, it's a coup d'etat, it's a globalist communist takeover of the United States. It's fairly simple. They've taken over the courts. They've taken over everything. If you can't get justice in the courts, you're going to have to either get it in the streets or live under communist totalitarian rule. The people just don't know it yet because life is kind of ordinary. So, and I could get into the the CARES Act and how they did it. It's just a behavior modification, had nothing to do with putting money into support hospitals to to help a disease. Now they incentivized ventilators to be used, which has a kill rate of 86%. They incentivize remdesivir to be used. They incentivize baricitinib to be used. They incentivize COVID to be put on a death certificate. So if you subsidize something, you get more of it. Walter e Williams Was economist. Go ahead. Speaker 0: Well, it was, no. No. I was just gonna say it was, midazolam. Is that one of the drugs that were used over with you guys at all? Speaker 1: Yeah. So in that's in the hospital MERS side, by my analysis, and I it's too detailed to get into right now, but, I think I think more than half of the excess death murders were not from, the vaccine. And Mhmm. And, in the US, they use midazolam also. I could tell you the cocktail. When they're setting you up to go on a ventilator to kill you, midazolam, larazepam, propofol, dexmedetomidine, and fentanyl. That's the general cocktail. You can substitute, like, another opioid for fentanyl. You can substitute, some of the antianxieties. But for the most part, they they killed people with these drugs that are basically end of life drugs that suppresses breathing at the same time you're trying to breathe because you have a cold, which is COVID. Yeah. I'm not saying COVID isn't more, but most people don't let it get past their I don't wanna say let. Most people don't have it get past their mucosa in their lungs Mhmm. To get the spike protein traveling around the body. That's a very rare thing. So you do have myocarditis from COVID, but you won't find it in data because the signal is too small. 100 times more than that signal is when you inject something in your arm that produces those spikes like a factory. And, yeah, that that you do see the harm, you do see the signals from the jab, but not from COVID itself. Speaker 0: Well, you know, you're 100% right when you say that the vaccine has been basically wiped out and that, you know, the vaccine industry has been impacted in such a powerful way, in a negative way. So I sometimes talk to people that talk about things like, well, you know, follow the money. And I think corruption and I think money is definitely there. There's, like, no doubt about it. But if that's the case, then how shortsighted would it have been then for them to then have done that? So is there a darker, more nefarious reason as to why they were pushing to get needles into everybody's arms? Because I remember, you know, everything from free burgers to taxi rides to lottery tickets, you name it. They were truing everything they could to entice people to get what effectively was a medical, experimental procedure. It it can't even really be classified as a proper vaccine because it doesn't fall within those kind of guidelines. It was a it was a gene editing therapy. What do you think then if it wasn't money and, I mean, a lot of people made a lot of money. Let's face it. There's a lot of people most definitely made a lot of money, so I'm not saying that wasn't the case. But, ultimately, what was the reason for this, do you think? Speaker 1: Yeah. It it's it's basically a global communist takeover. It was it was it Malthusian in which they wanted to kill a lot of people and reduce the population of the earth? There are a few individuals at the top who knew the, results that would flow from some of the actions that were taken. When the, I think that everybody has their role to play. And when you get down lower, they have less information about the overall mission. They have their objective, which is different from a mission. They have a specific task to accomplish within the objective, and they have different strategies. I mean, military intelligence, what is their purpose in this? Because they're the ones that were tapped on the shoulder throughout, Operation Warp Speed in the United States. You guys have your mutton crew over there. I forget the what what else you call it, but, you you know who I'm talking about. Speaker 0: Yeah. I know exactly. And and, I mean, we've we've got we've got Mi 5. We've got Mi 6. We've got Brigade 77 that suppressed a lot of people that were trying to stand up and, and call it out. Then you have exactly the same type of operations going on over there. But but in terms of, in terms of the harms and the the vaccine injuries, I mean, the the even with the likes of the work that you've done yourself in collating this huge amount of data, very specific, very detailed, despite that and and great work being done in other countries by other people as well. I've just come from an interview with people from the Netherlands who have really kind of exploded on the scene with the the data that they're looking at. They just don't seem to want to know. And it's like trying to get anybody from the government to sit down and acknowledge that there is a massive problem here is a nightmare scenario. People just they just don't wanna talk about it. And, of course, you know, there is information coming to light. I think that there is a a flood of information that's about to break. Whether or not that ends up in some kind of new Nuremberg trial, I don't know. I mean, if justice was to be done, I think you would probably agree with me that that should be where we take this. And those doctors, those politicians that went along with it that had shares in Pfizer and Moderna, like our own British prime minister, Ritchie Sounick, that went and decided to put half a $1,000,000,000 of his own personal wealth into Moderna that up until that point, because he did this in 2017, up until that point, had never had a successful product means what did he know? You don't just go and put half a $1,000,000,000 into into a company that has no track record. So what did he know? Did he have inside information? Did he know what's about to come? Well, a lot of people think that he probably did because he's part of this globalist system, this this globalist mentality that's going on out there. And we need to call it for for what it is. And, I think that there is a dark eugenics program going on there. And, we just need to look at what happened in the care homes. We need to look what happened and what is still happening. And, I mean, I couldn't believe it. The current CDC director, I forget her name. I think it's a woman, just within the last few weeks said, come and get your 10th booster, I think it was. Oh, I Speaker 1: went did Speaker 0: yeah. That's right. Marie Cohen. Couldn't believe what I was hearing. Speaker 1: She's so ridiculous. I I she was one of my I have the, that she she received, which which one? She received the CDC memorandum about 3 or 4 weeks ago. So she is on notice. And there's a letter there that that says that that's a notice of criminal liability. They have to act on information and belief the public is being harmed. And they're not going to do it. So what's the next step? You know, we talk about all those global stuff, but all the answers are local, not global. Yeah. The answers are, you you you know, endear yourself to the local police because they they're gonna be taking you away in chains otherwise. You let them know that you're trying to save their kids too, and they're not gonna escape their kids getting killed by government. So they might as well, and then I don't know if you have district attorneys or what you have over there for Speaker 0: prosecution. Yeah. Yeah. Speaker 1: But but, yeah, we we need, grand jury. You guys don't have grand juries. You get rid of them. We still have them. So I'm trying to get grand jury investigations going where the people, 23 citizens, have subpoena power to bring a person or subpoena, bring bring your stuff with you, like, bring the records. We can subpoena records or people. So even a county in Oklahoma or South Dakota, if you had a grand jury going, they could subpoena Fauci or somebody. So what happens is here's what's gonna happen. You gotta get some of these county or state grand juries to investigate. They're gonna subpoena people from DC. DC people are gonna say, no. We're not gonna show up. Speaker 0: And now Speaker 1: you have a standoff between the states and the federal government. Speaker 0: And Right. Speaker 1: And the the, Supreme Court of the United States is gonna have to adjudicate. Do you have to go and sit and give evidence to the state? And that's gonna be where the standoff in the civil war occurs, whether it's Speaker 0: I think you mentioned that. It's it's it's a it's a big topic. I mean, I'm watching things very closely. We're we're running, we're we're running late into the segment. I'm probably gonna to wrap it up, but we're gonna have to have you back on. Would would you get back on with me, John? Speaker 1: Absolutely. I I didn't show a lot of stuff. I mean, I I couldn't be on anything. Speaker 0: Well, I I think now is a good time you do it. I I the the only thing is, as I say, we're running out of time, but I want to as I always do with my guests onto this channel, I want to give you the last word. So for the last, you know, 2, 3 minutes, the floor is yours, John, to say whatever you wanna say. Speaker 1: Wow. That's that's great, Jim. I appreciate that. You know, people have to take care of their own families. And, this is a this is not a viral pandemic. It's a moral pandemic. You have a pandemic of immorality at every level of, of both government and media and everything else. So, I'd say look to god. I, I wasn't that religious before I am now. I lost my son. I've had certain signs. I'm no genius. God has put bread crumbs in front of me, and I follow them. And I found things no one else in the world has found. And and these these two publications here, I'm not just trying to push my books, but there's nothing like them in the world. And the book is written for regular people. In fact, the subtitle is COVID facts for regular people. I I gotta figure out European distribution. So I'm trying to I'm trying to find somebody in the UK. I I think I found a printer. Like, you love print, and there's another one printed demand demand or something. Speaker 0: But, Speaker 1: that's just printing. I need somebody to fulfill all the orders, like, some, fulfillment house. Anyway, the real cdc.com, you can buy the ebook versions, and that's above my head right up there. Therealcdc.com. Very simple. Very easy. And, the way out of this is is local, and it's through faith in God. And, you know, the men gotta stand up and be men. All I see are women in this movement. There's some guys sorry. Sorry to all the guys. You see a lot of forward facing guys talking on podcasts. But in local communities, the the the guys are all working, like, dad, don't bother me with that with that. It's like, oh, really? You know, I haven't gone into all the names of kids who died, 7 year old, 11 year old, 12 year old, 17 year old, 13, 15, 30 year old, documented within the CDC memorandum, individuals with names who died hours, sometimes 1 or 2 days after the jab. And it's all there's nothing like this in the world as far as proof. I guess that's it. Thank you very much. Speaker 0: Well, John, it's been a pleasure to meet you. You know, there's a few people that reached out to me and said, hey, Jim. You gotta get John Baldwin on your show and, and talk to me. He's a mine of of of massive amount of information. And I'm glad I did because, you clearly are, and you've got a great Rumble channel. Please send me the link to that, John, by DM, and I'll make sure that that goes on to, into when it goes into editing, I'll make sure they put that on for you. And I would certainly say to the people out there, you know, give John a follow. He's he's got some some incredible work that he's done, on all of this. And, I just like to say a huge thank you, John. It's always nice to meet you people as well, especially people from the States. You know? I've, I love America. I love the American people. I was very honored to be over there, as I say, and met some great people there. And, I would love to get a little bit more of your thoughts on Donald Trump, the forthcoming election, what's actually gonna go on. We have we're out of time just now, but we're gonna definitely get you back on to get some analysis for that as well. So my my sincere thanks to you, John. I really appreciate you coming on with me. Speaker 1: Thank you, Jim. I I try to avoid the politics thing, but I'll I'll talk for you because it was such a good interview. Thank you. I appreciate it. Speaker 0: Well, but but I really appreciate you saying that. Alright. Well, look. Thanks, John, and thanks to each and every one of you out there who are listening to this channel as well. I know of a lot of American people that follow me, a lot of Canadians, a lot of people. We are truly an international channel here, and I'm I'm very grateful to our guests when they came on. They they they talk about very personal things, sometimes deeply troubling, but we've got to know the truth. And I appreciate when you share and like these interviews because it helps them in the work that they're doing as well. So as I always like to say, you guys are the real stars of this show. This is Jim Ferguson. Thanks once again. Bye bye for now.

Via Vera Vita – Truth is the most valuable thing we have. Let us economize it. ~Twain viaveravita.com

@JimFergusonUK — Jim Ferguson

Posted - May 24, 2024 at 7:27 AM

Saved - May 24, 2024 at 11:08 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

Dr. Deborah Birx, former White House Coronavirus Response Coordinator, has admitted to manipulating data and altering CDC guidelines without the administration's knowledge. In her book, she reveals her method of reporting as a "strategic sleight-of-hand" and discusses her role in implementing COVID policies such as testing, lockdowns, and masking.

@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson

Dr. Deborah Birx Admits She Manipulated Data and Altered CDC Guidelines to Deceive President Trump Dr. Deborah Birx, who served as the White House Coronavirus Response Coordinator under President, has admitted in a new book that she quietly called her own shots during the COVID-19 plandemic. Birx confessed to manipulating data and quietly altering CDC guidance without the administration’s knowledge or authorization. In “Silent Invasion,” she discusses how she “devised” a “strategic sleight-of-hand” method of reporting she described as “subterfuge.” Birx, who appeared alongside Fraudci and Trump during briefings, was instrumental in paving the way for destructive COVID policies such as testing, lockdowns, and masking. “I devised a work-around for the governor’s reports I was then writing,” Birx admits in her new book. “Instead of including those recommendations in the common bulleted list, I’d include them in the pandemic summary and state-specific recommendations in the governor’s reports, where they wouldn’t be so obvious.” #ExcessDeaths #Trump https://welovetrump.com/2022/07/20/dr-deborah-birx-admits-she-manipulated-data-and-altered-cdc-guidelines-to-deceive-president-trump/

Dr. Deborah Birx Admits She Manipulated Data and Altered CDC Guidelines to Deceive President Trump Dr. Deborah Birx, who served as the White House Coronavirus Response Coordinator under President, has admitted in a new book that she quietly called her own shots during the COVID-19 plandemic. Birx confessed to manipulating data and quietly altering CDC guidance without the administration’s knowledge or authorization. In “Silent Invasion,” she discusses how she “devised”... welovetrump.com

@stkirsch — Steve Kirsch

Posted - October 24, 2024 at 2:56 AM

Saved - October 25, 2024 at 3:54 AM

@stkirsch - Steve Kirsch

Want to know how they hid all the vaccine deaths? They simply mislabeled them as COVID deaths. Here's the proof in 30 seconds:

Video Transcript AI Summary

The speaker wants the subjects to admit and stop committing fraud, and to correct old records. The speaker claims to have found over 100 accidental deaths, including blunt force trauma and acute fentanyl overdoses, that were falsely classified as COVID deaths after the bodies were tested for COVID. The speaker alleges that COVID death numbers were inflated to instill fear.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Well, it the adjunctive relief I want I'm asking the, I'm asking them to admit the fraud, stop committing fraud, and correct the old records. And when I say fraud, I mean, I found it over a 100 well over a 100, accidental deaths such as, blunt force trauma to the head and torso, acute fentanyl overdoses. They tested dead bodies for COVID, and they called them COVID deaths. And they ran up the numbers for COVID death to make everybody afraid of COVID, and I caught them.

@felicittina — Felicittina 🤨⁉️🔎±φ

Posted - March 2, 2025 at 10:31 AM

Saved - March 2, 2025 at 12:18 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

I express strong concern over the manipulation of death statistics in Japan since 2023, where a 14.5% increase in 'expected' deaths seems fraudulent. Analyzing data from 2017 to 2024 reveals that observed deaths remain below these expectations. The demographic changes among the elderly raise significant questions, especially since Japan's elderly population is stagnating. I also critique the use of outdated algorithms for death predictions and highlight similar issues in the UK, where under-mortality statistics are being overlooked.

@felicittina - Felicittina 🤨⁉️🔎±φ

1. NO! http://exdeaths-japan.org, you do NOT have the right to disguise the excess deaths in #Japan since 2023, based on ‘expected’ deaths 🔴 up by... +14.5%. That's called fraud! ⏬ (1/n)

日本の超過および過少死亡数ダッシュボードこのダッシュボードでは、日本国内の新型コロナウイルスの感染流行期（2020年1月以降）およびそれ以前の期間（2017-2019年）における超過および過少死亡数の算出値を表示しています。地域や期間を選択することにより、興味がある地域・期間における超過および過少死亡数を表示させることが可能です。 exdeaths-japan.org

@felicittina - Felicittina 🤨⁉️🔎±φ

2. And indeed, when you look at the result of their calculations since March 2023, you see that most of the bars🟦, showing observed deaths, remain well below the dashed line, showing ‘expected’ deaths. https://exdeaths-japan.org/en/graph/weekly/

日本の超過および過少死亡数ダッシュボードこのダッシュボードでは、日本国内の新型コロナウイルスの感染流行期（2020年1月以降）およびそれ以前の期間（2017-2019年）における超過および過少死亡数の算出値を表示しています。地域や期間を選択することにより、興味がある地域・期間における超過および過少死亡数を表示させることが可能です。 exdeaths-japan.org

@felicittina - Felicittina 🤨⁉️🔎±φ

3. To the naked eye, the change in "expected" deaths may seem insignificant, but let's download these data and average them over the first 47 weeks available from 2017 to 2024. https://exdeaths-japan.org/data/Estimates_weighted.csv The jump in these 'expected' deaths between 2022 and 2024 is +14.5%. 🚀

@felicittina - Felicittina 🤨⁉️🔎±φ

4. Only an upheaval in the demographics of the oldest could explain such a leap. Let's have a look! Here's a comparison with the changes in population numbers by age group found on the https://www.stat.go.jp/english/data/jinsui/2.html website. The disproportion raises questions, doesn't it?

Statistics Bureau Home Page/Result of the Population Estimates The Statistics Bureau and the Director-General for Policy Planning of Japan play the central role in the official statistical system in producing and disseminating basic official statistics,and coordinating statistical work under the Statistics Act and other legislation. stat.go.jp

@felicittina - Felicittina 🤨⁉️🔎±φ

5. Japan is in fact one of the few, if not the only country to experience such stagnation in its elderly population. [To compile this data, I had to rummage through several files and some values are rounded off. If you find a more complete summary, please let me know].

@felicittina - Felicittina 🤨⁉️🔎±φ

6. This site is not strictly speaking governmental, but it is supported by the Ministry of Health @MHLWitter and run by a panel of 14 scientists from the highest institutions and universities. You can find their names and functions here: https://exdeaths-japan.org/en/#member

日本の超過および過少死亡数ダッシュボードこのダッシュボードでは、日本国内の新型コロナウイルスの感染流行期（2020年1月以降）およびそれ以前の期間（2017-2019年）における超過および過少死亡数の算出値を表示しています。地域や期間を選択することにより、興味がある地域・期間における超過および過少死亡数を表示させることが可能です。 exdeaths-japan.org

@felicittina - Felicittina 🤨⁉️🔎±φ

@MHLWitter 7. The method used to calculate such implausible death predictions refers evasively to a ‘Farrington algorithm’. But the referenced page dates from... July 2020 and concerned the analysis of deaths up to April 2020. https://exdeaths-japan.org/en/#method

日本の超過および過少死亡数ダッシュボードこのダッシュボードでは、日本国内の新型コロナウイルスの感染流行期（2020年1月以降）およびそれ以前の期間（2017-2019年）における超過および過少死亡数の算出値を表示しています。地域や期間を選択することにより、興味がある地域・期間における超過および過少死亡数を表示させることが可能です。 exdeaths-japan.org

@felicittina - Felicittina 🤨⁉️🔎±φ

@MHLWitter 8. In fact, in my humble opinion, the only possible change in death forecasts after a period of excess mortality would be a fall (🟡 on the graph). Premature deaths are bound to create a gap in future statistics. You don't die twice!

@felicittina - Felicittina 🤨⁉️🔎±φ

@MHLWitter 9. Version française :

@felicittina - Felicittina 🤨⁉️🔎±φ

1. NON ! http://exdeaths-japan.org, vous n'avez pas le droit de camoufler les surmortalités au Japon depuis 2023, en vous appuyant sur des décès "attendus" 🔴en hausse de… +14,5%. Cela s'appelle une fraude ! ⏬ (1/n)

日本の超過および過少死亡数ダッシュボードこのダッシュボードでは、日本国内の新型コロナウイルスの感染流行期（2020年1月以降）およびそれ以前の期間（2017-2019年）における超過および過少死亡数の算出値を表示しています。地域や期間を選択することにより、興味がある地域・期間における超過および過少死亡数を表示させることが可能です。 exdeaths-japan.org

@felicittina - Felicittina 🤨⁉️🔎±φ

10. In #UK, the same procedure is used, with a model that relies on periods of excess mortality to make its predictions, with results that are just as aberrant, but so reassuring, for those who do not want to know🙈🙉🙊https://t.co/MCaFzZuGkp

@felicittina - Felicittina 🤨⁉️🔎±φ

🇬🇧 Incredible statistics from #England & #Wales! According to the @ONS, they have experienced an UNDER-MORTALITY of -8.3% in 2024! And nobody's talking about it, how fabulous it is? It's quite clear, let me explain... [1/12] https://t.co/1crO0wokwC

@goddeketal — Dr. Simon Goddek

Posted - April 18, 2025 at 4:20 PM

Saved - April 18, 2025 at 11:18 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

I shared insights on how the pandemic was manipulated for power, detailing staged events, misleading statistics, and psychological tactics used to instill fear. I discussed the false narratives around asymptomatic spread, the inflation of COVID death counts, and the suppression of effective treatments to promote vaccines. The media played a crucial role in perpetuating panic, while dissent was silenced. Ultimately, I argued that the pandemic served as a pretext for a broader agenda, reshaping society under elite control, rather than focusing on public health.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

🧵HOW THEY CREATED THE FAKE PANDEMIC They fooled the world, crashed economies, censored truth, and rewrote science overnight. Here's exactly how they turned fear, lies, and propaganda into the greatest power grab of our time. ⬇️ A THREAD ⬇️ https://t.co/4wWONfONjy

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

1. Staged Wuhan Panic: China kicked off the scare with choreographed "collapse in the street" videos. People dramatically keeling over in Wuhan, something never seen elsewhere. Even WHO called these collapses "atypical." It was pure psy-op theater to ignite global fear. https://t.co/v7vaoBXXM4

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

2. Bogus PCR cases: A phony testing regime built the “casedemic.” The German cirologist @c_drosten introduced a PCR test that can’t diagnose infection – cranked to excessive cycle thresholds so it flagged mostly false positives. Millions of healthy people were branded “dangerous COVID cases,” juicing the numbers to justify lockdowns.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

3. “Asymptomatic spread” myth: They pushed the lie that healthy people could silently infect others, to justify testing and restricting those with no symptoms. But there is no such thing as asymptomatic transmission. This was propaganda to lock down the healthy and mask toddlers. What many people don’t know is that the person who came up with the lie of asymptomatic transmission is the same one who created the COVID PCR protocol: the German virologist Christian Drosten.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

4. Coordinated Narrative Shift on COVID: On Feb 1, 2020, Fauci, Drosten, Andersen & others had a secret call. They admitted COVID might be lab-made. Within days, they flipped, pushed the natural origin lie, and Andersen got millions in grants. Science was replaced with narrative. https://t.co/r4fqdyx9Ip

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

5. Weaponized psychology: Governments literally hired behavioral psychologists to crank up the fear. In the UK, the SPI-B team admit they used “unethical” fear tactics – one scientist called it “totalitarian… not ethical” – to increase compliance. Leaked documents show officials discussing how to frighten the public into obedience. This was a deliberate fear pandemic, not a viral one.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

6. Needed fake mortality: The sniffles were never going to kill enough people to sustain panic. To maintain the illusion of a deadly pandemic, they needed excess mortality data. So they cooked the books to create the appearance of mass death (see next points). COVID’s true infection fatality rate (~0.2% globally) is akin to a bad flu – so they had to inflate the body count by any means.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

7. Manufactured hysteria illness: Since “mild cold symptoms” wouldn’t deliver the death spike they needed, authorities terrorized everyone to trigger mass psychogenic illness – essentially people getting sick from fear via chronically elevated cortisol levels. These elevated levels suppress immunity; anxiety and lockdown harms caused spikes in deaths (heart attacks, overdoses) that they then counted as “COVID.” It was a self-fulfilling pandemic of fear.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

8. 24/7 media terror: They blasted fear propaganda non-stop. News tickers ran running death tolls, every hospital incident became front-page news, and worst-case models dominated headlines. Governments fed the panic with lurid warnings (Boris Johnson claiming “bodies piled high” if restrictions lifted). By design, the public was kept in a state of constant fear. Objective risk (median COVID age ~80) was ignored to create the impression anyone could drop dead tomorrow.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

9. Flu cases relabeled as COVID: Flu virtually disappeared. Instead of celebrating the end of flu, officials pretended it was due to COVID measures – an absurd lie while COVID supposedly ran rampant. They simply rebranded the flu (and other respiratory illnesses) as “COVID” to inflate the pandemic.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

10. Every death counted as COVID: If you died in a car crash but tested positive, it was marked as a COVID death. Guidelines said even if the cause was clearly unrelated, it still counted. Hospitals were told to list deaths as COVID if the patient had ever tested positive or was merely suspected. Even those who died within two weeks of a positive test were included. This wildly inflated the stats by labeling non-COVID deaths as COVID.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

11. Financial incentives to inflate deaths: Hospitals had a perverse monetary motive to jack up COVID diagnoses. In the US, thanks to emergency payouts, a COVID patient on a ventilator could bring in ~$40,000 – roughly triple the normal reimbursement. Medicare’s 20% bonus for COVID cases and ventilator bonuses meant big $$$ for hospitals that labeled patients as COVID and put them on vents. This incentivized over-treatment and even negligence (e.g. unnecessary venting with ~90% fatality once intubated). It literally paid to have more COVID deaths.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

12. Early treatments banned: They aggressively suppressed effective therapies to protect the vaccine rollout. Doctors using ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, or vitamin D were vilified. The Lancet published a fake HCQ study (later retracted) that halted global trials. Meanwhile, they pushed toxic and expensive remdesivir. Even monoclonal antibodies and IV vitamin C were restricted. Denying real treatment let patients worsen, driving deaths and fear, all to pave the way for their “miracle” vaccines.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

13. Fake hospital footage & crisis actors: Media showed us scenes of overflowing hospitals – often misleading or outright fake. Example: CBS News was caught using video of a packed Italian ICU while reporting on NYC’s COVID situation, implying New York hospitals were overrun. They called it an “editing mistake.” Similar stunts happened worldwide (recycling old disaster photos, staging scenes). Meanwhile, many hospitals were actually so empty (elective care canceled) that nurses had time for TikTok dance videos. The “overwhelmed hospitals” narrative was largely a scripted show to panic the public.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

14. Draconian lockdowns with no benefit: They imposed China-style society-wide lockdowns – a blunt instrument never recommended in prior pandemic plans. Small businesses, schools, churches all shuttered by government decree. The result was a devastating economic and social harm, with no proven mortality benefit.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

15. “Vaccines are the only way out”: After stoking panic and crushing cures, they presented the magic solution – rushed mRNA vaccines. Self-proclaimed health experts like Bill Gates promised these experimental shots were 95% effective and safe, that vaccination would end the pandemic. Governments shoveled billions to Pharma and granted them blanket immunity from liability for any harms. They then coerced the public via mandates and “passport” systems. It was a massive human experiment, using fear to sell acceptance of a novel vaccine platform and to cement a new level of state and corporate control over individual bodies.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

16. Lies about vaccine efficacy: They did not hesitate to lie. The CDC Director herself falsely claimed “vaccinated people do not carry the virus” and won’t get sick. President Biden said “you’re not going to get COVID if you have these vaccinations.” These statements were patently false – breakthrough infections happened by the millions, and studies showed vaccinated individuals can spread COVID. They knowingly oversold the vaccines to bully people into compliance, then kept changing the story (“you need a booster…actually 3 boosters…”). Fun fact: If you died within two weeks of a positive PCR test, you were counted as a COVID death — no questions asked. But if you died within two weeks of the vaccine? “Doesn’t count, it hadn’t kicked in yet.” One rule to inflate fear, another to protect the narrative.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

17. Goalposts forever shifting: Nothing was ever temporary. “15 days to slow the spread” turned into 15 months of restrictions. They said masks were unnecessary – then mandated two masks. They said lockdowns would be one-time – then reimposed them repeatedly. They promised “herd immunity” at 70% vaccinated – then moved the target. Each time the public met one demand, authorities doubled back and added more, betraying every assurance. This psychological abuse kept societies off-balance and prolongued the emergency powers indefinitely.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

18. Crushing and punishing dissent: Any expert or citizen who questioned the narrative was attacked. High-profile scientists who proposed focused protection (the Great Barrington Declaration) were subjected to a secret campaign by NIH officials calling for a “quick and devastating takedown” of them. Doctors who saved patients with ivermectin or other protocols were stripped of licenses. Online skeptic communities were purged from Facebook , Twitter, and YouTube. Whistleblowers (nurses, data analysts) faced gag orders. The establishment used character assassination and censorship to maintain the illusion of unanimous “Science” support, quashing debate through intimidation.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

19. Data rigging to promote vaccines: When vaccines rolled out, they manipulated statistics to credit them. In May 2021 the CDC quietly stopped tracking COVID cases among vaccinated people unless hospitalized or dead. Tens of thousands of breakthrough infections disappeared from the data. By counting every case in unvaccinated but ignoring most in vaccinated, they fabricated a narrative that “almost only the unvaccinated” were getting sick. This was a blatant data trick to prop up vaccine efficacy and fuel scapegoating of the unvaccinated.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

20. Ever-changing variants to extend fear: Just as the original wave waned, they hyped new “variants of concern” – Alpha, Delta, Omicron – to keep fear alive, and then blamed it on the unvaccinated. Each variant became the next reason for booster shots and continued restrictions. Media dutifully pumped scary stories (“Delta hitting young people”, “Omicron evades immunity”) with little context. It was a moving target to prevent the public from relaxing. By the time people caught on that each variant was milder than advertised, another one was on the horizon. The endless variants ensured the panic carousel kept spinning.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

21. Excess mortality surged post-vaccination: After mass vaccination campaigns, excess deaths rose dramatically, and continue even now. Authorities blamed everything from heatwaves to gardening and “climate anxiety,” desperately avoiding the most obvious cause: the jab itself. https://t.co/E7pam6YzfC

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

22. Inventing "Long COVID": As vaccine injuries surged, authorities conveniently introduced "Long COVID", a vague, catch-all diagnosis. Its broad, ambiguous symptoms perfectly matched common post-vaccination side effects, masking the truth behind escalating injuries. https://t.co/Q7JvQbAOeO

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

23. Conveniently “ending” the pandemic: After three years of orchestrated chaos, they abruptly declared the crisis over – not because of any scientific breakthrough, but for political convenience. The WHO ended the global emergency in May 2023, even as excess mortality remained high. Suddenly, COVID coverage vanished. Leaders who imposed tyranny moved on to the next agenda (Ukraine, climate) without apology or accountability. The pandemic theater ended when its architects chose to shift focus — not when the virus faded. Now they want amnesty for terrorizing citizens for years.

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

24. Engineered for the Great Reset: In sum, the “pandemic” was a planned global power grab – a pretext for a new world order. Consider that in October 2019, globalists (WEF/Gates) ran Event 201, a tabletop exercise simulating a coronavirus pandemic that crashes economies and prompts draconian measures. Sound familiar? Just months later, COVID-19 hit and governments executed in lockstep the very playbook discussed. Klaus Schwab of the WEF openly called COVID-19 a “rare but narrow window” to impose the Great Reset of society. From lockdowns to digital IDs, the pandemic fulfilled a wish-list of authoritarian controls. This was never about public health – it was about exploiting a virus to restructure society under elite rule. The “fake pandemic” narrative has been proven by each of these hard facts, and history will remember it as one of the greatest frauds ever perpetrated. Thank you for reading this thread and please give it a share and me a follow if you found it informative. Much appreciated.

Video Transcript AI Summary

As a young generation, we are grateful to penetrate cabinets. The change can be shaped by us. We have to prepare for a more angry world by taking action to create a fairer world. I see the need for a great reset. People assume we are just going back to the good old world, but this is fiction. It will not happen. There is only one way this pandemic is going to go: it's going to get worse and worse and worse. The next crisis is already waiting for us, and it is the climate crisis.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: As a young generation like prime minister Trudeau, half of this cabinet are actually young noble leaders of the world are grateful. We penetrate the cabinets. The change is not just happening. The change can be shaped by us. We have to prepare for a more angry world. How to prepare? Take the necessary action to create a fairer world. I see the need for a great reset. So people assume we are just going back to the good old world which we had and everything will be normal again. This is, let's say, fiction. It will not happen. Speaker 1: There is only one way this pandemic is going to go. It's going to get worse and worse and worse. Speaker 0: The next crisis is already waiting for us around the coma, and it is the climate crisis.

@MarioNawfal — Mario Nawfal

Posted - April 26, 2025 at 3:38 PM

Saved - April 28, 2025 at 2:02 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

A recent study revealed that 45.3% of deaths labeled as "COVID deaths" in Athens during the Omicron wave were not caused by COVID at all. Researchers examined 530 hospital deaths and found that many patients died from conditions like cancer, sepsis, strokes, heart failure, or kidney failure. Some individuals even tested positive without showing COVID symptoms. This distinction between dying with COVID and dying because of COVID was overlooked, leading to inflated death statistics.

@MarioNawfal - Mario Nawfal

🇬🇷STUDY: 45% OF “COVID DEATHS” IN ATHENS WEREN’T REALLY FROM COVID Researchers checked 530 hospital deaths during the Omicron wave — and found 45.3% didn’t die from COVID at all. Most actually died from cancer, sepsis, strokes, heart failure, or kidney failure — but because they tested positive, they got stamped as “COVID deaths” anyway. Some didn’t even have COVID symptoms — but hey, a positive test was all it took to make the numbers look scarier. Dying with COVID and dying because of COVID are two very different things… but the officials pretended they were the same. Source: Scientific Reports Media Source: @thackerpd

@thackerpd - Paul D. Thacker

Study finds 45% of people reported to have died of COVID, did not die of COVID. Media and quoted "experts" repeatedly overstated COVID deaths during the pandemic, scaring the shit out of the public. It was almost military duty for some science writers. https://t.co/ILW551fDHs

@its_The_Dr — Johnny Midnight ⚡️

Posted - July 12, 2025 at 4:24 AM

Saved - August 8, 2025 at 11:34 AM

@its_The_Dr - Johnny Midnight ⚡️

73.9 percent of the deaths were from the Vaccine! 💉 https://t.co/FNbAH85K4p

Video Transcript AI Summary

According to the speaker, the best data to support their opinion comes from autopsies. In the largest autopsy series published to date, of which the speaker is the senior author, 73.9% of individuals who underwent autopsy after vaccination were determined to have died as a result of the vaccine. The first author of the study is Holsher and colleagues.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: And do you have any science to back up your your opinion? The best data are autopsies. So in the largest autopsy series published to date, I know because I'm the senior author. Of all the deaths examined and we reviewed them. We had an adjudication committee. We had ways of arbitration deciding on did the vaccine cause death. The answer is of these cases that came in for autopsy after vaccination, seventy three point nine percent of individuals, it was determined that the vaccine was the cause of death. First author is Holsher and colleagues who's sitting right behind me.

@HealthRanger — HealthRanger

Posted - July 14, 2025 at 9:29 PM

Saved - July 15, 2025 at 7:16 PM

@HealthRanger - HealthRanger

SMOKING GUN PROOF of covid vaccine "death waves" just released https://t.co/cmn5pck0yz

@ClareCraigPath — Dr Clare Craig

Posted - August 26, 2025 at 5:32 PM

Saved - August 27, 2025 at 3:29 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

I've explored the alarming rise in deaths among infants under one year old in the USA, particularly since 2021. My analysis reveals significant increases in female deaths, with a notable rise in deaths of unknown causes, indicating a potential new pathology. The data shows that while black babies have not seen an increase in mortality, white babies have experienced a concerning surge. This trend is not merely a continuation of previous causes and suggests a deeper issue that warrants urgent attention.

@ClareCraigPath - Dr Clare Craig

USA - your babies are dying. I have taken a deep dive to understand exactly what's happening with deaths of under 1 year olds. Who wants to look at baby deaths? I get it. But DO NOT LOOK AWAY. It is.... https://t.co/STjt6NqsdE

@ClareCraigPath - Dr Clare Craig

First of all I did this because of frustration with people arguing over what "expected" deaths should look like. You can make up reasons for picking particular years and come up with a totally different story. '99-'19 excess deaths from '21 '11-'16 deficit in deaths from '21 https://t.co/TP6DpOj4Jd

@ClareCraigPath - Dr Clare Craig

What can we do to see if the rise is meaningful? First we can look monthly ('24 and '25 data is incomplete) Here are the monthly deaths for females which rises from March 2021 (having been below expected before) and stays high except for deficit in winter 2021-2022. https://t.co/eVK3F1Q47W

@ClareCraigPath - Dr Clare Craig

Here's the same for males. The excess is not as high. Female excess '21-'23 inclusive = 1523 Male excess '21-'23 inclusive = 890 https://t.co/a3kSU0vVu5

@ClareCraigPath - Dr Clare Craig

Here is the percentage of deaths that were female. This is highly statistically significant and highly indicative of a new pathology not present in 2020. https://t.co/jekCt2dgWO

@ClareCraigPath - Dr Clare Craig

Next I looked at cause of death. SIDS was 76% of deaths of unknown cause in under 1s in 1999 but only half by 2019. Therefore, I looked at all deaths of unknown cause. Again there is a highly statistically significant rise from 2021 on. https://t.co/sKZyNAd8qK

@ClareCraigPath - Dr Clare Craig

Lastly, I looked at race differences. CDC coding and definitions keep changing but I am hoping they were at least consistent for both deaths and populaiton making mortality rate reliable. Groupings changed so I just looked at white and black / african american. Female: https://t.co/7lwAX1iBFE

@ClareCraigPath - Dr Clare Craig

The ratio of white to black babies dying has, like the other markers, rocketed since 2021. It is statistically significant but worse for females. Males https://t.co/oYyuWuziQ9

@ClareCraigPath - Dr Clare Craig

It turns out that black babies (while they sadly die more overall) have not seen an increase since 2021. The increase is in white babies. Females https://t.co/aSVo6IC2Es

@ClareCraigPath - Dr Clare Craig

Males https://t.co/Fow0oaBPQB

@ClareCraigPath - Dr Clare Craig

These deaths include deaths attributed to covid (a total of about 350) - but notably the same age group did not see many deaths in 2020. Unlike for other age groups children saw worse covid mortality than 2020 only after vaccines were introduced. And 2023>2021! https://t.co/FjqNZmPdqz

@ClareCraigPath - Dr Clare Craig

With three statistically significant and large signals in sex ratio, deaths of unknown cause and race ratio there is indeed a cause for alarm. The rise is real. In 2021, I reassured friends that when the babies started dying it would all be over. I was so very wrong.

@ClareCraigPath - Dr Clare Craig

full article on DrClareCraig S* Stack

@ClareCraigPath - Dr Clare Craig

@HopeRising19 More female deaths tells us this is not simply more of the same causes as before. It indicates a new pathology from 2021. The new pathology is more prevalent in white babies. That is not what you would see from economic stresses nor from most previous causes of death.

@kurtcaz1 — Kurt Caz

Posted - September 2, 2025 at 7:50 PM

Saved - September 3, 2025 at 2:10 PM

@kurtcaz1 - Kurt Caz

They’re lying about the numbers https://t.co/t1yoxWQAXs

Video Transcript AI Summary

Guys, this is Paris in 2025. They're lying about the numbers. This is the new France. Coming soon. Coming soon to you, to a neighborhood near you.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Guys, this is Paris in 2025. They're lying about the numbers. This is the new France. Coming soon. Coming soon to you, to a neighborhood near you.