TruthArchive.ai - Related Post Feed

File411
Posted - January 18, 2020 at 11:21 PM
Saved - February 16, 2023 at 6:37 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The House Judiciary, Intelligence, and Managers have filed their impeachment brief against President Trump, alleging that he abused his power by using his office for personal gain and obstructed Congress by preventing investigations into his misconduct. Trump's legal defense is weak and he is not denying pressuring Ukraine. This is a threat to our democracy and future presidents. The Senate must be impartial and hold him accountable. President Trump's impeachment defense team has cherry-picked Sir William Blackstone's treaties and lied about the obstruction of Congress claim. They also failed to mention that absolute immunity does not extend to former senior officials. Trump's brief is weak and unconstitutional, and his assertion that the Senate cannot remove him even if the House proves every claim in the Articles of impeachment is chilling and dead wrong. In response, House Democrats have released a replication to Trump's answers, which is worth reading. It is important that the Senate remains impartial and holds the President accountable for his actions. Failure to do so would set a dangerous precedent for future presidents and threaten the integrity of our democracy.

@File411 - File411

Guys the @HouseJudiciary @HouseIntel and House Managers @RepAdamSchiff @RepJerryNadler@RepJeffries @RepZoeLofgren@RepValDemings @RepJasonCrow@RepSylviaGarcia Have FILED their Impeachment Brief... https://intelligence.house.gov/uploadedfiles/in_re_president_trump_house_impeachment_trial_brief_and_sof_1.18.20.pdf

@File411 - File411

@HouseJudiciary @HouseIntel @RepAdamSchiff @RepJerryNadler @RepJeffries @RepZoeLofgren @RepValDemings @RepJasonCrow @RepSylviaGarcia Opening paragraph is exquisitely simple This is NOT Democrat v Republican These are important matters of: Our Republic Oath of Office Rule of Law The very foundation of our Democracy - our Constitution & our founding fathers set in place a check & balance https://intelligence.house.gov/uploadedfiles/in_re_president_trump_house_impeachment_trial_brief_and_sof_1.18.20.pdf

@File411 - File411

@HouseJudiciary @HouseIntel @RepAdamSchiff @RepJerryNadler @RepJeffries @RepZoeLofgren @RepValDemings @RepJasonCrow @RepSylviaGarcia Abuse of Power argument is again exquisite in it’s simplicity. These are the facts. Trump used the awesome & immense power of the office of the President of the United States of America for his own personal gain. Full Stop ps exhibit downloading now🤓 https://intelligence.house.gov/uploadedfiles/in_re_president_trump_house_impeachment_trial_brief_and_sof_1.18.20.pdf

@File411 - File411

@HouseJudiciary @HouseIntel @RepAdamSchiff @RepJerryNadler @RepJeffries @RepZoeLofgren @RepValDemings @RepJasonCrow @RepSylviaGarcia Abuse of Power - Foreign interferences “pernicious act” Trump’s “anti corruption” stance belies credulity. He didn’t ask for an investigation - he ONLY wanted a pubic announcement from President Zelensky. Funds Frozen + Oval Mtg withheld = leverage https://intelligence.house.gov/uploadedfiles/in_re_president_trump_house_impeachment_trial_brief_and_sof_1.18.20.pdf

@File411 - File411

@HouseJudiciary @HouseIntel @RepAdamSchiff @RepJerryNadler @RepJeffries @RepZoeLofgren @RepValDemings @RepJasonCrow @RepSylviaGarcia Ackkk BRB apparently my family is annoyed that I haven’t cooked dinner...ungrateful heathens Not thrilled I was like ORDER something from Uber Eats and close my (home) Office Door. As I threw cash at them

@File411 - File411

@HouseJudiciary @HouseIntel @RepAdamSchiff @RepJerryNadler @RepJeffries @RepZoeLofgren @RepValDemings @RepJasonCrow @RepSylviaGarcia 🚨INSANE in the MEMBRANE🚨 Trump’s 7 page “answers” to the impeachment - he seems to be taking the impeachment rather well. Note my sarcasm. Good GOD this is the BEST his “1990’s legal team” can do? FFS this is embarrassing for Trump https://drive.google.com/file/d/1T8xwi1n7LQ9DBAxFt23ZBL75TZC8cP6p/view?usp=drivesdk

@File411 - File411

@HouseJudiciary @HouseIntel @RepAdamSchiff @RepJerryNadler @RepJeffries @RepZoeLofgren @RepValDemings @RepJasonCrow @RepSylviaGarcia PS so you can affirm the authenticity of that horribly histrionically written 7 page of legal garbage This is the “official” White House link https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Answer-of-President-Donald-J.-Trump.pdf

@File411 - File411

@HouseJudiciary @HouseIntel @RepAdamSchiff @RepJerryNadler @RepJeffries @RepZoeLofgren @RepValDemings @RepJasonCrow @RepSylviaGarcia FTR Trump’s actual brief is due on Monday so that 7 page petulant garbage screed is the “amuse-bouche” of the expected gold-leaf turd-sammich. (I’m going straight to hell) Back to a REAL and substantive legal brief https://intelligence.house.gov/uploadedfiles/in_re_president_trump_house_impeachment_trial_brief_and_sof_1.18.20.pdf

@File411 - File411

@HouseJudiciary @HouseIntel @RepAdamSchiff @RepJerryNadler @RepJeffries @RepZoeLofgren @RepValDemings @RepJasonCrow @RepSylviaGarcia The closing argument as to the Abuse of Power is incredibly powerful: “President Trump’s continuing presence in office undermines the integrity of our democratic processes and endangers our national security” https://intelligence.house.gov/uploadedfiles/in_re_president_trump_house_impeachment_trial_brief_and_sof_1.18.20.pdf

@File411 - File411

@HouseJudiciary @HouseIntel @RepAdamSchiff @RepJerryNadler @RepJeffries @RepZoeLofgren @RepValDemings @RepJasonCrow @RepSylviaGarcia Moving on to Obstruction of Congress - again the opening paragraph is exquisite in it’s simplicity: “President Trump obstructed Congress by undertaking an unprecedented campaign to prevent House Committees from investigating his misconduct” https://intelligence.house.gov/uploadedfiles/in_re_president_trump_house_impeachment_trial_brief_and_sof_1.18.20.pdf

@File411 - File411

@HouseJudiciary @HouseIntel @RepAdamSchiff @RepJerryNadler @RepJeffries @RepZoeLofgren @RepValDemings @RepJasonCrow @RepSylviaGarcia “If the President could both avoid accountability under the criminal laws and preclude an effective impeachment investigation, he would truly be above the law...President Trump’s conduct is the Framers’ worst nightmare” https://intelligence.house.gov/uploadedfiles/in_re_president_trump_house_impeachment_trial_brief_and_sof_1.18.20.pdf

@File411 - File411

@HouseJudiciary @HouseIntel @RepAdamSchiff @RepJerryNadler @RepJeffries @RepZoeLofgren @RepValDemings @RepJasonCrow @RepSylviaGarcia SMART CLOSING - this is BIGGER than Trump: “...future Presidents will feel empowered to resist any investigation into their own wrongdoing, effectively nullifying Congress’s power to exercise the Constitution’s most important safeguard against Presidential misconduct”

@File411 - File411

@HouseJudiciary @HouseIntel @RepAdamSchiff @RepJerryNadler @RepJeffries @RepZoeLofgren @RepValDemings @RepJasonCrow @RepSylviaGarcia “His misconduct challenges the fundamental principle...Americans should decide American elections...a divided system of government, in which no single branch operates without the check and balance of the others, preserves the liberty we all hold dear” https://intelligence.house.gov/uploadedfiles/in_re_president_trump_house_impeachment_trial_brief_and_sof_1.18.20.pdf

@File411 - File411

@HouseJudiciary @HouseIntel @RepAdamSchiff @RepJerryNadler @RepJeffries @RepZoeLofgren @RepValDemings @RepJasonCrow @RepSylviaGarcia Sorry to be redundant - but IMO the closing argument is phenomenally written - in terms of substance, the totality, somberness and gravity of what our Democracy faces. “A man you can bait with a tweet” - @HillaryClinton https://intelligence.house.gov/uploadedfiles/in_re_president_trump_house_impeachment_trial_brief_and_sof_1.18.20.pdf

@File411 - File411

@HouseJudiciary @HouseIntel @RepAdamSchiff @RepJerryNadler @RepJeffries @RepZoeLofgren @RepValDemings @RepJasonCrow @RepSylviaGarcia @HillaryClinton The rest of the 101 pages present a damning and incontrovertible case of WHY @senatemajldr @SenateGOP @SenSchumer @SenateDems need to be true & faithful to their oath - to be impartial. If the Senate acquits - vote them out in 2020. Full Stop https://intelligence.house.gov/uploadedfiles/in_re_president_trump_house_impeachment_trial_brief_and_sof_1.18.20.pdf

@File411 - File411

@HouseJudiciary @HouseIntel @RepAdamSchiff @RepJerryNadler @RepJeffries @RepZoeLofgren @RepValDemings @RepJasonCrow @RepSylviaGarcia @HillaryClinton @senatemajldr @SenateGOP @SenSchumer @SenateDems “a man you can bait with a tweet" can't be trusted "with nuclear weapons" - @HillaryClinton Yup that’s my closing argument - she warned all of us. Some of us listened. Some of you didn’t and now we are all paying the price

Video Transcript AI Summary
Imagine him in the Oval Office facing a crisis. A man easily provoked by a tweet cannot be trusted with nuclear weapons. Jackie Kennedy once said that during the Cuban Missile Crisis, President Kennedy worried that a war could be started by small-minded individuals driven by fear and pride. America's strength lies in intelligence, sound judgment, calm determination, and the strategic use of power. This is the type of leader I promise to be as commander in chief.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If you dare, imagine imagine him in the oval office facing a real crisis. A man you can bait with a tweet is not a man we can trust with nuclear weapons. I I can't put it I can't put it any better than Jackie Kennedy did after to the Cuban Missile Crisis. She said that what worried president Kennedy during that very dangerous time was that a war might be started. Not by big men with self control and restraint, but by little men, the ones moved by fear and pride. America's strength doesn't come from lashing out. It relies on smarts, judgment, cool resolve, and the precise and strategic application of power, and that's the kind of commander in chief I pledge to be.

@File411 - File411

@HouseJudiciary @HouseIntel @RepAdamSchiff @RepJerryNadler @RepJeffries @RepZoeLofgren @RepValDemings @RepJasonCrow @RepSylviaGarcia @HillaryClinton @senatemajldr @SenateGOP @SenSchumer @SenateDems Laid upon the table - again @HillaryClinton warned us. Some of us listened & took her warnings to heart Some of you didn’t and now we are ALL suffering the consequences of your “decisions”

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 accuses the other person of playing chicken with 1800 nuclear warheads and lacking respect. The speaker claims that the other person would prefer a puppet as the president of the United States, but it is clear that the accuser is the puppet. The accusation also implies that the Russians have been involved in some way.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: 1800 nuclear warheads, and she's playing chicken. Look. What what from everything I see, has no respect for this person. Well, that's because he'd rather have a puppet as president of the United States. No puppet. It's pretty clear You're the puppet. It's pretty clear you won't admit No. You're the the Russians have engaged

@File411 - File411

@HouseJudiciary @HouseIntel @RepAdamSchiff @RepJerryNadler @RepJeffries @RepZoeLofgren @RepValDemings @RepJasonCrow @RepSylviaGarcia @HillaryClinton @senatemajldr @SenateGOP @SenSchumer @SenateDems And lastly I make zero apologies for the music choice. None. Nada Zilch https://youtu.be/EQXbFHpZbXc

@File411 - File411

@HouseJudiciary @HouseIntel @RepAdamSchiff @RepJerryNadler @RepJeffries @RepZoeLofgren @RepValDemings @RepJasonCrow @RepSylviaGarcia @HillaryClinton @senatemajldr @SenateGOP @SenSchumer @SenateDems I can not emphasize how important these paragraphs are (Obstruction of Congress Article) The fact that Trump, @WhiteHouse @OMBPress @ENERGY @SecretaryPerry @StateDept @SecPompeo @DeptofDefense @EsperDoD @TheJusticeDept refused to produce a SINGLE document

Video Transcript AI Summary
Some suggest waiting for all witnesses and documents before proceeding with impeachment, but President Trump obstructed the investigation. He instructed his senior aides not to testify and defy subpoenas. He also told agencies not to provide relevant records, hindering our investigation.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Now some have suggested that we should wait to proceed with these impeachment proceedings because we've not heard from all of the witnesses or obtained all the documents. But the reason we have not heard from all the witnesses or documents is because President Trump himself has obstructed the investigation. He's directed his most senior aides who are involved in some of these events not to come testify, to defy subpoenas. He has told every one of his agencies with records that could be relevant not to Reduce those records to us to try to obstruct our investigation.

@File411 - File411

@HouseJudiciary @HouseIntel @RepAdamSchiff @RepJerryNadler @RepJeffries @RepZoeLofgren @RepValDemings @RepJasonCrow @RepSylviaGarcia @HillaryClinton @senatemajldr @SenateGOP @SenSchumer @SenateDems @WhiteHouse @OMBPress @ENERGY @SecretaryPerry @StateDept @SecPompeo @DeptofDefense @EsperDoD @TheJusticeDept Because I can tell you with a pretty high degree of certainty this is going to be used by the House Managers Trump: 'We're fighting all the subpoenas' https://www.politico.com/story/2019/04/24/trump-subpoenas-mueller-report-1289431

Trump vows to fight 'all the subpoenas' as partisan tensions spike The Trump administration is aggressively responding to lawmakers' efforts to probe all aspects of the presidency. politico.com

@File411 - File411

@HouseJudiciary @HouseIntel @RepAdamSchiff @RepJerryNadler @RepJeffries @RepZoeLofgren @RepValDemings @RepJasonCrow @RepSylviaGarcia @HillaryClinton @senatemajldr @SenateGOP @SenSchumer @SenateDems @WhiteHouse @OMBPress @ENERGY @SecretaryPerry @StateDept @SecPompeo @DeptofDefense @EsperDoD @TheJusticeDept And perhaps you should re-watch the December 9, 2019 hearing where Barry Berke made one helluva strong closing argument as to Trump’s Obstruction of Congress. Thusly explaining “mens rea” and “actus rea” by way of Trump’s own words & actions -the end

Video Transcript AI Summary
President Trump obstructed the impeachment investigation by instructing witnesses not to testify and withholding relevant records. This mirrors his actions during the prior Department of Justice investigation. He created a false record and attacked investigators and witnesses. On July 24th, the special counsel testified, and the very next day, Trump spoke to President Zelensky to further his Ukrainian scheme. He believed he could act above the law and obstruct the investigation if caught. However, courageous individuals testified and provided undeniable evidence that Trump prioritized his political interests over national security and election integrity. He intentionally and corruptly abused his powers, which goes against the principles of our constitution. No one, not even the president, is above the law.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Now some have suggested that we should wait to proceed with these impeachment proceedings because we've not heard from all of the witnesses or obtained all the documents. But the reason we have not heard from all the witnesses or documents is because president Trump himself has obstructed the investigation. He's directed his most senior aids who are involved in some of these events not to come testify, to defy subpoenas. He has told every one of his agencies with records that could be relevant not to produce those records to us, to try to obstruct our investigation. Now, this is evidence that president Trump is replaying the playbook used in the prior Department of Justice this investigation. In that investigation, he directed his White House counsel to create a false, phony record and document and lie Denying that president Trump had told him to fire the special counsel. He did many other things to try to interfere with that investigation. He attacked the investigators and and witnesses and called them horrible names just as he has done here. And president Trump thought he got away with it. On July 24th was the day that special counsel the special counsel testified before this committee and the House Intelligence Committee, The 24th. It was exactly the following day, 25th, that president Trump spoke to president Zelensky and furtherance of his Ukrainian scheme. He thought he got away with it. Not only that, he thought he could use his powers to interfere with that investigation so he could do what he wanted. He could act like he was above the law. And if he got caught, he would again use his powers to try to obstruct the investigation and prevent the facts from coming out. And that's exactly what he did. But fortunately, fortunately, because of the true American patriots who came forward to testify despite the threats by president against the people who worked in his own administration. They told the story. They, on their own, produced documents that provide uncontroverted, clear and overwhelming evidence that president Trump did this scheme. He put his political reelection interest over the nation's national security and the integrity of its elections. He did it intentionally. He did it corruptly. He abused his powers in ways that the founders feared the most. No person in the in this country has the ability to prevent investigations, and neither does the president. Our constitution does not allow it. No one is above the law, not even the president.

@File411 - File411

@HouseJudiciary @HouseIntel @RepAdamSchiff @RepJerryNadler @RepJeffries @RepZoeLofgren @RepValDemings @RepJasonCrow @RepSylviaGarcia @HillaryClinton @senatemajldr @SenateGOP @SenSchumer @SenateDems @WhiteHouse @OMBPress @ENERGY @SecretaryPerry @StateDept @SecPompeo @DeptofDefense @EsperDoD @TheJusticeDept Indeed... Here’s a truth when you do NOT have facts or the law on your side then your only plausible “defense” is to argue “the process” But even then the Trump’s 7 pg missive masquerading as defense is the most mendacious pathetic legal filing I’ve read

@File411 - File411

@HouseJudiciary @HouseIntel @RepAdamSchiff @RepJerryNadler @RepJeffries @RepZoeLofgren @RepValDemings @RepJasonCrow @RepSylviaGarcia @HillaryClinton @senatemajldr @SenateGOP @SenSchumer @SenateDems @WhiteHouse @OMBPress @ENERGY @SecretaryPerry @StateDept @SecPompeo @DeptofDefense @EsperDoD @TheJusticeDept Bless his little heart Pulling it down now

@File411 - File411

@HouseJudiciary @HouseIntel @RepAdamSchiff @RepJerryNadler @RepJeffries @RepZoeLofgren @RepValDemings @RepJasonCrow @RepSylviaGarcia @HillaryClinton @senatemajldr @SenateGOP @SenSchumer @SenateDems @WhiteHouse @OMBPress @ENERGY @SecretaryPerry @StateDept @SecPompeo @DeptofDefense @EsperDoD @TheJusticeDept OMFG - he’s NOT denying he pressured Ukraine https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Trial-Memorandum-of-President-Donald-J.-Trump.pdf

@File411 - File411

@HouseJudiciary @HouseIntel @RepAdamSchiff @RepJerryNadler @RepJeffries @RepZoeLofgren @RepValDemings @RepJasonCrow @RepSylviaGarcia @HillaryClinton @senatemajldr @SenateGOP @SenSchumer @SenateDems @WhiteHouse @OMBPress @ENERGY @SecretaryPerry @StateDept @SecPompeo @DeptofDefense @EsperDoD @TheJusticeDept The opening salvo by Trump’s “stellar legal team” is about exactly what we should have expected. The level of intellectual contortion is just mind bending https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Trial-Memorandum-of-President-Donald-J.-Trump.pdf

@File411 - File411

@HouseJudiciary @HouseIntel @RepAdamSchiff @RepJerryNadler @RepJeffries @RepZoeLofgren @RepValDemings @RepJasonCrow @RepSylviaGarcia @HillaryClinton @senatemajldr @SenateGOP @SenSchumer @SenateDems @WhiteHouse @OMBPress @ENERGY @SecretaryPerry @StateDept @SecPompeo @DeptofDefense @EsperDoD @TheJusticeDept FFS you CHERRY picked SIR William Blackstone’s treaties (hundreds of pages) Come on - I thought Trump’s legal was an amalgam of “preeminent litigators” this is ridiculously awful - JFC they literally pulled ONE sentence out of Sir Blackstone’s writings https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Trial-Memorandum-of-President-Donald-J.-Trump.pdf

@File411 - File411

@HouseJudiciary @HouseIntel @RepAdamSchiff @RepJerryNadler @RepJeffries @RepZoeLofgren @RepValDemings @RepJasonCrow @RepSylviaGarcia @HillaryClinton @senatemajldr @SenateGOP @SenSchumer @SenateDems @WhiteHouse @OMBPress @ENERGY @SecretaryPerry @StateDept @SecPompeo @DeptofDefense @EsperDoD @TheJusticeDept First off you daft nitwit at the TIME our Constitution was ratified there were VERY FEW CRIMINAL LAWS on the books Your mendacity is a mix of sad, poor legal advice & equally deficient counter argument. Trump’s Abuse of power counter argument = <500 words https://whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Trial-Memorandum-of-President-Donald-J.-Trump.pdf

@File411 - File411

@HouseJudiciary @HouseIntel @RepAdamSchiff @RepJerryNadler @RepJeffries @RepZoeLofgren @RepValDemings @RepJasonCrow @RepSylviaGarcia @HillaryClinton @senatemajldr @SenateGOP @SenSchumer @SenateDems @WhiteHouse @OMBPress @ENERGY @SecretaryPerry @StateDept @SecPompeo @DeptofDefense @EsperDoD @TheJusticeDept Under AG Barr MAIN @TheJusticeDept is a fully own incorporated Trump Inc “obstruction of Congress” claim is frivolous and dangerous... he asserted legal rights and privileges of the Executive Branch against defective subpoenas” “only AFTER..” that’s a LIE https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Trial-Memorandum-of-President-Donald-J.-Trump.pdf

@File411 - File411

@HouseJudiciary @HouseIntel @RepAdamSchiff @RepJerryNadler @RepJeffries @RepZoeLofgren @RepValDemings @RepJasonCrow @RepSylviaGarcia @HillaryClinton @senatemajldr @SenateGOP @SenSchumer @SenateDems @WhiteHouse @OMBPress @ENERGY @SecretaryPerry @StateDept @SecPompeo @DeptofDefense @EsperDoD @TheJusticeDept Trump’s “only after” belies credulity - in APRIL of 2019 @RealDonaldTrump while on the south lawn of the White House he said the following “we are fighting all subpoenas,” “I don’t want people testifying,” and “no do-overs."

Video Transcript AI Summary
Attorney General Barr's refusal to release the full Mueller report and evidence led to the House Judiciary Committee holding him in contempt of Congress. Although an agreement was reached on some underlying evidence, it remains uncertain if the Department of Justice will honor the deal. Former White House counsel, Don McGahn, has also withheld documents and refused to testify. This pattern of stonewalling extends beyond the Mueller report, affecting various aspects of Americans' lives. These include the president's assault on affordable healthcare, particularly for those with preexisting conditions, family separation policy, misuse of military funds for the border wall, and attacks on civil rights protections.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Attorney general Barr refused to release the full, unredacted Mueller report and underlying evidence. That's why the House Judiciary Committee recently voted to hold him in contempt contempt of Congress. There was news today that an agreement was reached on some of the underlying evidence, but it is yet to be seen whether the Department of Justice will live up to its side of the deal. Meanwhile, former White House counsel, Don McGahn, has also failed to provide documents to Congress while refusing to testify before Congress. This unrelenting campaign of stonewalling doesn't stop with the Mueller report. It includes many issues that impact Americans' everyday lives. Issues like the president's attack on the affordable health care coverage, including those with preexisting conditions, his family separation policy, his misappropriation of military funds for his offensive border wall, his attack on civil rights protections

@File411 - File411

@HouseJudiciary @HouseIntel @RepAdamSchiff @RepJerryNadler @RepJeffries @RepZoeLofgren @RepValDemings @RepJasonCrow @RepSylviaGarcia @HillaryClinton @senatemajldr @SenateGOP @SenSchumer @SenateDems @WhiteHouse @OMBPress @ENERGY @SecretaryPerry @StateDept @SecPompeo @DeptofDefense @EsperDoD @TheJusticeDept @realDonaldTrump This is so fucking intellectually dishonest - Trump uses an AG Reno OLC - but FAILS to state how/what the Court ruled (Miers & Espy) that “absolute immunity” does NOT extend to former Sr officials (see next tweet for subthread) https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Trial-Memorandum-of-President-Donald-J.-Trump.pdf

@File411 - File411

@HouseJudiciary @HouseIntel @RepAdamSchiff @RepJerryNadler @RepJeffries @RepZoeLofgren @RepValDemings @RepJasonCrow @RepSylviaGarcia @HillaryClinton @senatemajldr @SenateGOP @SenSchumer @SenateDems @WhiteHouse @OMBPress @ENERGY @SecretaryPerry @StateDept @SecPompeo @DeptofDefense @EsperDoD @TheJusticeDept @realDonaldTrump Re the 2007 OLC Memo and the broadness & brazenness of Trump trying to “extend” absolute immunity to Kris Kobach & others. ⚖️See subthread ⚖️

@File411 - File411

@HouseJudiciary @HouseIntel @RepAdamSchiff @RepJerryNadler @RepJeffries @RepZoeLofgren @RepValDemings @RepJasonCrow @RepSylviaGarcia @HillaryClinton @senatemajldr @SenateGOP @SenSchumer @SenateDems @WhiteHouse @OMBPress @ENERGY @SecretaryPerry @StateDept @SecPompeo @DeptofDefense @EsperDoD @TheJusticeDept @realDonaldTrump See 2nd subthread the fact that Trump’s (not) awesome legal team is in fact lying in their Impeachment Brief shows he thinks he’s above our Laws, our Constitution and the truth and facts. It is shameful and the only one “debasing” here is Trump

@File411 - File411

@HouseJudiciary @HouseIntel @RepAdamSchiff @RepJerryNadler @RepJeffries @RepZoeLofgren @RepValDemings @RepJasonCrow @RepSylviaGarcia @HillaryClinton @senatemajldr @SenateGOP @SenSchumer @SenateDems @WhiteHouse @OMBPress @ENERGY @SecretaryPerry @StateDept @SecPompeo @DeptofDefense @EsperDoD @TheJusticeDept @realDonaldTrump You don’t have to agree with me but this is one of the main reasons I was petty vocal that Nadler should NOT be a House Manager bc I expected Trump would do this...attack the person and/or process bc facts are not on Trump’s side https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Trial-Memorandum-of-President-Donald-J.-Trump.pdf

@File411 - File411

@HouseJudiciary @HouseIntel @RepAdamSchiff @RepJerryNadler @RepJeffries @RepZoeLofgren @RepValDemings @RepJasonCrow @RepSylviaGarcia @HillaryClinton @senatemajldr @SenateGOP @SenSchumer @SenateDems @WhiteHouse @OMBPress @ENERGY @SecretaryPerry @StateDept @SecPompeo @DeptofDefense @EsperDoD @TheJusticeDept @realDonaldTrump I can’t believe Trump and his circa 1996 “legal team” are this intractable. Um...the House DID and IS litigating in Court (now at SCOTUS) enforcement of subpoenas Therefore THIS. IS. A. BLATANT. LIE. (see next tweet) https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Trial-Memorandum-of-President-Donald-J.-Trump.pdf

@File411 - File411

@HouseJudiciary @HouseIntel @RepAdamSchiff @RepJerryNadler @RepJeffries @RepZoeLofgren @RepValDemings @RepJasonCrow @RepSylviaGarcia @HillaryClinton @senatemajldr @SenateGOP @SenSchumer @SenateDems @WhiteHouse @OMBPress @ENERGY @SecretaryPerry @StateDept @SecPompeo @DeptofDefense @EsperDoD @TheJusticeDept @realDonaldTrump Weird so apparently Trump et al appear to be suffering from acute “selective amnesia” You know wha cures that precious ailment? The FACTs, lots and lots of FACTs FTR the separation of powers argument is kind of interesting, purely academically interesting

@File411 - File411

@HouseJudiciary @HouseIntel @RepAdamSchiff @RepJerryNadler @RepJeffries @RepZoeLofgren @RepValDemings @RepJasonCrow @RepSylviaGarcia @HillaryClinton @senatemajldr @SenateGOP @SenSchumer @SenateDems @WhiteHouse @OMBPress @ENERGY @SecretaryPerry @StateDept @SecPompeo @DeptofDefense @EsperDoD @TheJusticeDept @realDonaldTrump Back in December of 2019 the Court literally eviscerated the Trump-DOJ argument re Absolute Immunity This case is now on the SCOTUS docket At any rate I promised the kiddos I’d take them metal detecting or build a pressure rocket with a STEM kit

@File411 - File411

@HouseJudiciary @HouseIntel @RepAdamSchiff @RepJerryNadler @RepJeffries @RepZoeLofgren @RepValDemings @RepJasonCrow @RepSylviaGarcia @HillaryClinton @senatemajldr @SenateGOP @SenSchumer @SenateDems @WhiteHouse @OMBPress @ENERGY @SecretaryPerry @StateDept @SecPompeo @DeptofDefense @EsperDoD @TheJusticeDept @realDonaldTrump Again this is Trump’s brief - a cursory read of it left me underwhelmed It’s more of a rantings of an power thirsty wanna be authoritarian madman So you enjoy reading this gold leaf-turd-brief https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Trial-Memorandum-of-President-Donald-J.-Trump.pdf

@File411 - File411

@HouseJudiciary @HouseIntel @RepAdamSchiff @RepJerryNadler @RepJeffries @RepZoeLofgren @RepValDemings @RepJasonCrow @RepSylviaGarcia @HillaryClinton @senatemajldr @SenateGOP @SenSchumer @SenateDems @WhiteHouse @OMBPress @ENERGY @SecretaryPerry @StateDept @SecPompeo @DeptofDefense @EsperDoD @TheJusticeDept @realDonaldTrump setting my own bias of @gtconway3d his OpEd is worth reading: “His arguments are wrong on the facts and wrong on the law, but that’s not the worst part. At its core..represents an attack on the impeachment process — and on the Constitution itself” https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2020/01/20/george-conway-oped-trump-impeachment-answer/

Opinion | George Conway: The worst thing about Trump’s response to the impeachment articles Their arguments are wrong on the facts and wrong on the law, but that’s not the worst part. washingtonpost.com

@File411 - File411

@HouseJudiciary @HouseIntel @RepAdamSchiff @RepJerryNadler @RepJeffries @RepZoeLofgren @RepValDemings @RepJasonCrow @RepSylviaGarcia @HillaryClinton @senatemajldr @SenateGOP @SenSchumer @SenateDems @WhiteHouse @OMBPress @ENERGY @SecretaryPerry @StateDept @SecPompeo @DeptofDefense @EsperDoD @TheJusticeDept @realDonaldTrump @gtconway3d JUST IN - @HouseDemocrats replication...to the answers submitted by Trump This was JUST released https://intelligence.house.gov/uploadedfiles/in_re_president_trump_house_impeachment_replication_1.20.20.pdf

@File411 - File411

@HouseJudiciary @HouseIntel @RepAdamSchiff @RepJerryNadler @RepJeffries @RepZoeLofgren @RepValDemings @RepJasonCrow @RepSylviaGarcia @HillaryClinton @senatemajldr @SenateGOP @SenSchumer @SenateDems @WhiteHouse @OMBPress @ENERGY @SecretaryPerry @StateDept @SecPompeo @DeptofDefense @EsperDoD @TheJusticeDept @realDonaldTrump @gtconway3d @HouseDemocrats Holy hell... “President Trump maintains that the Senate cannot remove him even if the House proves every claim in the Articles of impeachment. That is a chilling assertion. It is also dead wrong.” https://intelligence.house.gov/uploadedfiles/in_re_president_trump_house_impeachment_replication_1.20.20.pdf

@File411 - File411

@HouseJudiciary @HouseIntel @RepAdamSchiff @RepJerryNadler @RepJeffries @RepZoeLofgren @RepValDemings @RepJasonCrow @RepSylviaGarcia @HillaryClinton @senatemajldr @SenateGOP @SenSchumer @SenateDems @WhiteHouse @OMBPress @ENERGY @SecretaryPerry @StateDept @SecPompeo @DeptofDefense @EsperDoD @TheJusticeDept @realDonaldTrump @gtconway3d @HouseDemocrats Forgive me I went back in to Trump’s 101 Duplicitous (legalese is correct) but “deceptive in words or action” Trump’s brief unconstitutional (or iterate thereof) used 19xs I’m not a lawyer but even I can tell this is weak AF -like a petulant child. SAD! https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Trial-Memorandum-of-President-Donald-J.-Trump.pdf

Rasmussen_Poll
Posted - April 15, 2023 at 3:19 PM
Saved - June 16, 2023 at 1:49 PM

@Rasmussen_Poll - Rasmussen Reports

AZ 2020 Counterfeit Ballot Exhibits: Be kind and share? - Maricopa County 2020 Ballot official paper standard - Voter-volunteer ballot hand-examination findings - Maricopa County official response on issue - Further AZ Senate ballot analysis https://uncoverdc.com/2022/06/29/predetermined-algorithms-source-of-widespread-election-fraud-in-arizona/ https://www.uncoverdc.com/2022/06/29/predetermined-algorithms-source-of-widespread-election-fraud-in-arizona/

Predetermined Algorithms Source of Widespread Election Fraud in Arizona - UncoverDC Predetermined algorithms were the cause of widespread election fraud in Maricopa, says Jovan Hutton Pulitzer. uncoverdc.com

@Rasmussen_Poll - Rasmussen Reports

Voter Fraud: We've covered official state legislature investigations and court cases about 2020 voter fraud since they began. Voter fraud is real. Legacy media has been hiding it. Voter fraud renders election polling worthless so it has been and will remain a focus of ours. https://t.co/Ps4fsV7Cw8

RNCResearch
Posted - August 2, 2023 at 2:51 AM
Saved - August 2, 2023 at 3:46 AM

@RNCResearch - RNC Research

Here are 24 STRAIGHT MINUTES of Democrats denying election results

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers in the video discuss their belief that the 2016 and 2020 elections were stolen or illegitimate due to Russian interference, voter suppression, and issues with electronic voting machines. They express concerns about the integrity of the election process and question the legitimacy of the elected officials. They also mention specific instances such as the 2000 election and the Georgia gubernatorial race. Overall, they argue that the elections were not fair and call for reforms to ensure a more transparent and accurate voting system.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You can Speaker 1: run the best campaign. You can even become the nominee. And you can have the election stolen Speaker 2: from you. Speaker 3: How can you win with Russian interference, though? Speaker 2: That's the real thing. Cared about Speaker 1: it in 2020. But rightly. Speaker 2: Because I think I'm taking Speaker 3: an illegitimate president that didn't really win. So how do Speaker 2: you, you know, fight against that in 2020? You are absolutely right. He is an illegitimate president in my mind. Could you Speaker 4: be my vice president for Denimid president in my mind. Speaker 2: Could you be my vice president for candidate? Paul Brooks, I absolutely agree. Trump didn't actually win the election in 2016. He lost the election, and he was put in the office because the Russians interfered. Speaker 5: Russia interfered with our election, attacked our democracy for the sole purpose of artificially placing someone at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, they were successful. Speaker 1: Trump knows he's as an illegitimate president. Speaker 3: The president will elect, although legally elected, is not legitimate. Unless it is president-elect As a legitimate president. Speaker 6: You said you believe that Russia's interference altered the outcome of the election. Speaker 1: I do. We have a president who, if In fact, it is proven, has been assisted by the Russians and may, in fact, not be a legitimate president. The one thing that Trump Is fearful of, when it comes to his being president, is that finally, we will see how illegitimate his victory actually was. Speaker 2: I have an objection. Speaker 7: I object to the 15 votes from the state of North Carolina. I object because people are horrified. Speaker 6: He's an illegitimate president. Our election was hijacked. There is no question. Congress has a duty to hashtag protect our democracy and hashtag follow the facts. Speaker 5: John Lewis is completely right. There is a cloud of legitimacy around the election of Donald Trump. The Russians interfered with his election. James Comey and the FBI interfered with his, Election. The fake news industry interfered with his election. Speaker 1: Trump knows he's an illegitimate president who got illegitimate foreign powers. Do you believe Trump is a legitimate president? Speaker 4: What I believe is that there's no question that the outcome of this election was affected by the Russian interference. Speaker 2: There actually is a cloud of Okay. Legitimacy. Speaker 6: So that legitimacy is the question. Yes. Speaker 3: So that was a very tainted election. And and in that sense, it's it's illegitimate. Speaker 1: Why Why do you think the president is going to such great lengths to essentially prove that he beat you? Because he knows he didn't. He knows he's an illegitimate president. Speaker 6: Stolen email. Stolen drone. Stolen drone. Stolen election. Welcome to the world of unprecedented Trump. So do you believe President Trump is an illegitimate president. Speaker 2: Based on what I just said was I can't for Trump. Speaker 6: He tweeted in February 2018, quote, the more we learn about 2016 election, the more illegitimate it becomes. America deserves to know whether we have a fake president in the Oval Office. Speaker 3: And The rest in attempt to to have the election. And frankly, the FBI is weighing in on the election. I think make the make it makes this election illegitimate. Speaker 1: There was a widespread Understanding that this election was not on the level. We still don't know what really happened, Isaac. I mean, there's just a lot that I think will Be revealed, history will discover, but you don't win by 3,000,000 votes and have all this other shenanigans stuff going on and not come away with An idea like, woah, something's not right here. Speaker 5: Seems to me that there's a cloud of illegitimacy that continues to hang Over 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. Speaker 4: The outcome of the election was affected by their interference. And now we need to know, To what degree, if any, the Trump campaign was actually in collusion Speaker 1: with the Russia? He knows he's an illegitimate president. So of course, he's obsessed That's with me. And I believe that it's a guilty conscience. Speaker 2: We actually won the last presidential election, folks. They stole And Al Gore won that election. I think he won anyway. Actually, I think I carried Florida. Al Gore won the election nationwide Also in Florida, but the Supreme Court ruled the other way. Al Gore got more votes, but not enough to stay out of the Supreme Court where president Bush was elected five four. Speaker 1: Bush versus Gore. A court took away a presidency. Speaker 2: If all the votes were tallied in Florida, Adele Gold would be president today and George Bush would be back in office. Speaker 0: I come from Florida where you and others participated in what I call The United States coup d'etat. Speaker 6: In 2013, according to reports, vice president Joe Biden, he claimed that Al Gore was The one who was elected president. And he claimed that the recount result was, quote, a bad decision. Speaker 2: And never forget, dear friends, what they did in Florida to Al Gore and me, to all of us, to older Americans, to African Americans, to Haitian Americans Deny the right to vote and have those votes counted. Speaker 8: I do believe that projections were right in the 1st place at 7 o'clock when they called Speaker 1: it before. Let me tell you without a doubt. George Bush did not carry Florida and it was not closed. Speaker 2: There's no question that you won Oh, thank you, Charles. No. It's a question. Speaker 4: That's a question. Speaker 2: We will never know because The votes weren't weren't counted. But but and and then in your judgment I mean, that's unfortunate. And there is no other way of saying Let's be very blunt. Al Gore won the state of Florida in 2000, and we should never Forget it. Most Americans or great many Americans don't have confidence that the election of 2000 was fair. Speaker 8: But I don't believe we lost that. I believe we just failed to have all of the votes counted Speaker 4: The Supreme Court elected president. In 2004. Yeah. Al Gore won the state of Florida in 2000, although not the presidency. Speaker 3: We know we won this election. They know we won this election. And Americans know we won this election. Speaker 7: I know some people want you to believe that the Gore Campaign was a campaign that wasn't able to complete its mission. We did. Had all of Speaker 0: those votes been found in Florida, Speaker 8: I Speaker 7: think Al Gore would be president on today. Speaker 2: We had more votes. We won, and we are never going to let the United States Supreme Court choose the president of the United Takes the care. You should know by now based on the fact that he lost the popular vote by more than a half 1000000 voters, And we don't know how many he lost to buy in Florida. There's no doubt in my mind that Al Gore was elected president. Speaker 9: I rise to Object to the fraudulent 25 Florida electoral votes. Speaker 2: Really, we won the election in 2000, but they stole the election. I must object because of the overwhelming evidence of overwhelming evidence of official misconduct, deliberate fraud, and an attempt to The chairman has provided Imran had already Helped the Bush team with such favors as burying their rent a mob to Florida in 2000 to permanently halt of the counting of legally cast ballots. It is Speaker 7: signed by myself on behalf of my diverse constituents and the millions of Americans who have been disenfranchised by Florida's inaccurate vote counts to Supreme Court not to speak with Speaker 4: the United States despite of this election. Speaker 1: Speaking to a Democratic group in Chicago, he said he made it clear he thinks Al Gore was the winner. Speaker 2: The time it was over, our candidate won the popular vote. And the only way that could win the election was to stop the voting and fraud it. Catherine Harris, Jeb Bush, Jim Baker and the Supreme Court hadn't tampered with the results, l Gore would be. President? I think that the issue before us today, is not who won or should have won the 2000 presidential election. That issue has been settled not to my opinion, but it has been settled. Let's just drop the vice president president or not. Al Gore should have been president of the United States. Speaker 10: Al Gore, made it possible for George Bush to be The only appointed president in the history of these United States. Speaker 6: Democrats have won the past 3 presidential elections. In two Speaker 2: 1,000 unions turned out 25% of the vote and Al Gore won. But the Supreme Court hampered? That's a large The Supreme Court stopped the counting of votes, and if they've left the council on, Al Gore would've got the necessary votes. Speaker 0: The Supreme Court selected tent. George w Bush Speaker 2: as the president. He was not elected. There is overwhelming evidence that George w Bush did not win this Election. Speaker 3: What I observed, as a voter, as a citizen of Illinois, 4 years ago were troubling evidence of the fact that not every vote was being counted. Don't think that George w Bush won the election, in 2000 against our goal because I I think he he probably lost Florida and also the nationwide. Speaker 2: If you invite me back on this show Speaker 3: in about 8 weeks, I Speaker 2: think you're gonna learn that No, Roy. I think you get all the votes there. I felt what happened in Florida was a carefully worked out conspiracy. That many things could not go wrong in one state Without there having been a conspiracy, and many, many different things did go wrong. Many tricks were pulled of various kinds. Speaker 8: The vice president did win, but, And I do believe that the majority of voters that intended to to go to polls last year wanted to vote and cast their votes for Al Gore. I do believe that in in in terms of Florida as well. Speaker 2: The court has been supporting formation of the popular will. The most spectacular example being Bush versus Gore, where the majority by a five For a vote and joined the counting of more than a 100,000 ballots in Florida and essentially gave America its 1st court appointed president. A stolen citizen is naked and stolen. Even though Al Gore won the election, he won't take office. Speaker 11: That election was stolen from of the rightful winner. So, mister speaker, I'm here today to talk about a stolen presidential election. Speaker 2: I think in 2000, everybody Talk. Well, he did win the election out of the war. He started dividing America here in Florida By trying to take an election that I think any reasonable person would say he hadn't Actually, one. Speaker 0: What happened in Florida will go down in history As a coup d'etat. Speaker 2: Could we conclude, is it possible There was a conspiracy, and Florida officials were involved in the conspiracy. Never have so many things gone It's too wrong in one place before. Why how do all these things happen all at the same time in the same state? It is not as possible if there was a conspiracy that was very well organized. Why was the state police out there on that Today, election day, checking license plates and and so forth. You know, how did all these things happen in 1 state at one time in 1 election? Is is it possible that Use the word conspiracy and not be afraid of it. Speaker 1: I'm not sure wish Gore was president right now. He should be. Speaker 2: Well, yes, he got elected. Well done. A battle that by the will of the people should have ended in victory. But tens thousands of Florida votes either were not counted or tossed down in the 2000 presidential election. 5 supreme court justices. You've trumped the votes of 51,000,000 Americans. We should've let the entire state be reconned so it was clear, that Al Gore actually won the state of Florida. Speaker 0: And Al War won the election. Speaker 2: We had the election stolen from us. You must admit that. They stole it, And we need a leader to help us get revenge. Speaker 6: I voted for Al Gore. He won the election. Speaker 2: They usurped the the powers as far as being put in it and intervene. It was With the fix as far as we're concerned, you know, it's it's there's no polite way to talk about it except the fix was in. Speaker 0: After the election, when you stole Hold the election. You came back here and say, get over it. No. We're not gonna get over it. Speaker 2: You know it. I know it. They know it. We won that election. Speaker 12: Constantly shifting vote tallies in Ohio and malfunctioning electronic machines, which may not have paper receipts have led to additional loss of confidence by the public. Speaker 2: The right to vote has been stolen from qualified voters. The New Speaker 6: Yorker reported that Kerry thought that, quote, proxies for Bush had rigged many of the voting machines. Speaker 7: In 2004, the democratic process was thwarted. Speaker 2: To The 2004 presidential election in Ohio was riddled with unnecessary problems. Speaker 4: Some machines malfunctioned, causing votes to be counted more than once or not at all. Speaker 2: Based upon an inordinate number of allegations suggesting gross voting rights violations and misconduct, I joined with my colleagues and objective to counting the state of Ohio's electoral votes. As in 2000, the votes of many who wanted to vote were not, in fact, This Speaker 3: last Friday night, I I arranged to meet senator Kerry at a fundraiser to give him a copy of my book. He told me he now thinks the election was stolen. Speaker 1: The wife of John Kerry said she has lingering doubts about the legitimacy of the election. Her theory goes like this. 2 brothers, she calls hard right Republicans, Own 80% of voting machines in the US. Therefore, it would be easy to hack into the mother machines that control the electronic voting. Speaker 7: There were Numerous irregularities in Ohio, including large percentages of projections of provisional balloting, problems with voting machines. Speaker 1: As we look At our election system, I think it's fair to say that there are many legitimate questions about its accuracy, About its integrity. Speaker 12: There are still legitimate concerns over the integrity of our election. Speaker 3: The question obviously is How many instances were not caught that we don't know about? Number 1, we've seen a lot of, what I'll call, honest glitches where it just didn't work right, But also that these machines are hackable. A dishonest employee of the vendor or dishonest employee of the local board of elections or simply someone who knows electronics And as a computer at home, could hack into these machines and then put in the secret instructions to disregard every 20th Democratic voter had 10% to the carrier to the Bush vote or whatever. He might not even know it. Speaker 2: I agree with tens of millions of Americans Who are more very worried that when they cast the ballot on an electronic voting machine, that there There is no paper trail to record that vote. The numerous irregularities that occurred with the electronic voting machines In Ohio on November 2nd last year, point to an unresolved national crisis. Speaker 7: We cannot Clear that Speaker 3: the election of November 2, 2004 was free and clear and transparent and real. There must be independent testing of the voting machines used in Ohio. Speaker 1: I'm not confident that the election in Ohio was barely decided. We know that there was substantial voter suppression, and the machines were not reliable. Speaker 12: The members of Congress who have brought this challenge are speaking up for their agreed constituents, many of whom may have been disenfranchised in this process. Speaker 6: Treating today's electoral vote count in congress as a meaningless ritual would be an insult to our democracy unless we registered our own protest against the obviously fraud voting process that took place in so many Speaker 2: of our states. Voters who wish to cast a vote for president or vice president Can't approach the polls with certainty that their vote will be counted. One of the most significant problems in Ohio and in many other states Was a lack of measures to ensure the integrity of electronic voting machines. In 2004, they caused democratic voters in Ohio to wait for 8 hours before they could cast their ballot. They turned the department of civil rights and the justice department into the voter suppression division with Voter ID laws, voter purging, voter caging, voter intimidation. There aren't gonna be any more election stealing. Speaker 1: Now you have one very Speaker 6: We won. But I Speaker 1: didn't lose. I got the votes, but we won't know exactly how many because of how they cheat it. I did win my election. I just didn't get to have the job. We were robbed of an election. Without voter suppression, Stacey Abrams would be the governor of Georgia. Andrew Gillum is the governor of Florida. Using the Speaker 4: word rigged, using the word steal, do you think it's dangerous going into 2020? Speaker 1: I I don't because we can actually back it up. And so in response What I believe was stolen election. I'm not saying they stole it from me. They stole it from the voters' doors. That's when I was asked if I'm ever gonna concede. The answer is no. If she had a fair election, she already would have won. This is not a speech of concession. This is a step that needs to acknowledge an action that's right, true, or action is right, true or proper. And I will not concede because the erosion of our democracy is not You refuse to concede and say that you lost. Do you stand by that decision today? Absolutely. Speaker 2: If Stacey Abrams doesn't win in Georgia, they Stolen. It's clear. It's clear. Speaker 1: The only election It was not a free and fair I think the election was stolen from the people of Georgia. I believe it was stolen from the voters. Speaker 2: So I Speaker 3: think that Stacey Abrams' election is being stolen from her. Speaker 1: The election was not fair. The process was not fair. Thousands of Georgians had their voices stolen because they were not able to cast ballots. And they cannot be guaranteed that their votes will be counted in 2020 if we don't do this right. Speaker 4: If what happens to you happens nationally and we we see, whoever runs for whoever wins the Democratic nominee. If they say, actually, I can prove that there's a number of votes in every state that that and that's and that's the same thing that you just described happens in multiple states should they concede. Speaker 1: I do not think we should concede an election until we know the results of an election. I still fundamentally believed it could be fair. And that's just not how life works. If it looks like it's cheating, it probably is. If it looks like it's rigged, it probably is. Speaker 2: He would be the governor of Georgia today had the governor of Georgia not disenfranchised 1,400,000 Georgia voters before the election. That's what happened to Stacey Abrams. They took the votes away. Speaker 6: You, notably did not concede. I acknowledge. Okay. You acknowledge That he won, but you did not concede. Correct. 5 months later, do you still feel like your opponent won through voter suppression? Yes. Reminder, she wrote. Brian Kemp stole the gubernatorial election from Georgians and Stacey Abrams. Speaker 1: I said that the election stolen from Georgia voters, the process that took place during the legislative cycle was one that did not countenance and did not pay attention To the deep and real concerns of those who watch this election be stolen in the state of Georgia. It was stolen from the voters of Georgia. Georgia voters did not have their votes Counted. They were not allowed to cast votes. They had Speaker 2: their votes discarded. Certainly gave the appearance of unfairness. I think it was, unfair. Stacy ran a great campaign. Probably won. Speaker 1: And it was not fair to those who filled up absentee ballots. And depending on the county you sent it to, it Either it was counted or not counted, assuming you received it in time. Brian Kemp oversaw for 8 years the systematic and Systemic dismantling of our democracy, and that means there could not be free and fair elections in Georgia. As long as we have eligible American citizens who cannot cast a ballot, Then the game is rigged. I am complicit if I say that that system is fair. Concession in the political space is an acknowledgement that the process This is fair. And I don't believe that to be fair. But I refuse to concede because concession means that the process was proper, that the result was true and And right. And I cannot say that. If I tend to Speaker 0: say I didn't lose, I just didn't win. Speaker 12: And I don't call it a lot. Speaker 1: I just didn't win. Speaker 2: Yes. Yes. Officially. Yes. Officially. Speaker 1: Put it this way. I didn't get to get Inaugurated, next problem. Okay. But will I say that this election was not tainted, was not a disinvestment and a disenfranchisement of thousands of voters? I will not say that. Candidates votes, black and white, lost Their races because they have been deprived of the votes they otherwise would have gotten. And the clearest sample is from next door in Georgia. Stacey Abrams should be governor leading that state right now. I was joking with Beth backstage when she lost. I'm like, no, I just didn't win, because we don't know what really happened because of the miasma of voter suppression. I can't know for a fact that I would be the governor of Georgia, but for the He's in the management of Brian Kemp, but I know it's a pretty good guess. So I can't prove that I would have won, but I know we don't know because of how he behaved. Speaker 3: Is he the legitimate governor elect of Georgia? Speaker 1: He is the person who won an adequate number of votes from the governor. Speaker 2: With all with all due respect, and Speaker 3: I respect where you're coming from and I respect the the issues that you're raising. You're not answering the question. Do you think that Speaker 1: Wait a minute. I no. I what I talked to you Speaker 3: You're not using The word legitimate, is he the legitimate governor elect Georgia? Speaker 1: He is the legal governor of Georgia. He's not here to tell you that just because you win doesn't mean you're won. And you said to that you did not lose. You just did not win. Yes. So we're gonna talk about that. Bad news is that we didn't get the victory we secured. And the thing is we will never know empirically that I got more votes because we will never know which votes did make count. This was not fair. It was not right and it is deeply improper that someone could ascend to that role having performed So basically and so crassly against the very people he is now supposed to represent. The election was not fair. The process was not fair. So you don't feel that you lost fair and I do recognize I am not the governor of Georgia, but I do like to point out something that is true for me and for many in our state. And that is we won. Speaker 2: I'm not saying it's gonna be legit because the increase in the prospect of being illegitimate is a Direct proportions not being able to get these these reforms passed. Speaker 1: Right wing extremists already have a plan to literally seal the next presidential election. Speaker 13: It's not as if it's just Republicans who have monkeed around with elections in the past. Sometimes Democrats have to. Speaker 2: You Speaker 13: know, whenever people are in power, they're, you know, they have this tendency to try to, you know, tilt things in their direction.
libsoftiktok
Posted - August 2, 2023 at 11:37 PM
Saved - August 3, 2023 at 3:48 AM

@libsoftiktok - Libs of TikTok

It’s always a good time to reshare this compilation of Democrats denying election results:

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers in the video discuss their belief that the 2016 and 2020 elections were stolen or illegitimate due to Russian interference, voter suppression, and issues with electronic voting machines. They express concerns about the integrity of the election process and question the legitimacy of the winners. They also mention specific instances such as the 2000 election and the Georgia gubernatorial race. Overall, they argue that the elections were not fair and that there is a need for electoral reforms to ensure a more transparent and legitimate process.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You can Speaker 1: run the best campaign. You can even become the nominee. And you can have the election stolen Speaker 2: from you. Speaker 3: How can you win with Russian interference, though? Speaker 2: That's the real thing. Cared about Speaker 1: it in 2020. But rightly. Speaker 2: Because I think I'm taking Speaker 3: an illegitimate president that didn't really win. So how do Speaker 2: you, you know, fight against that in 2020? You are absolutely right. He is an illegitimate president in my mind. Could you Speaker 4: be my vice president for Denimid president in my mind. Speaker 2: Could you be my vice president for candidate? Paul Brooks, I absolutely agree. Trump didn't actually win the election in 2016. He lost the election, and he was put in the office because the Russians interfered. Speaker 5: Russia interfered with our election, attacked our democracy for the sole purpose of artificially placing someone at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, they were successful. Speaker 1: Trump knows he's as an illegitimate president. Speaker 3: The president will elect, although legally elected, is not legitimate. Unless it is president-elect As a legitimate president. Speaker 6: You said you believe that Russia's interference altered the outcome of the election. Speaker 1: I do. We have a president who, if In fact, it is proven, has been assisted by the Russians and may, in fact, not be a legitimate president. The one thing that Trump Is fearful of, when it comes to his being president, is that finally, we will see how illegitimate his victory actually was. Speaker 2: I have an objection. Speaker 7: I object to the 15 votes from the state of North Carolina. I object because people are horrified. Speaker 6: He's an illegitimate president. Our election was hijacked. There is no question. Congress has a duty to hashtag protect our democracy and hashtag follow the facts. Speaker 5: John Lewis is completely right. There is a cloud of legitimacy around the election of Donald Trump. The Russians interfered with his election. James Comey and the FBI interfered with his, Election. The fake news industry interfered with his election. Speaker 1: Trump knows he's an illegitimate president who got illegitimate foreign powers. Do you believe Trump is a legitimate president? Speaker 4: What I believe is that there's no question that the outcome of this election was affected by the Russian interference. Speaker 2: There actually is a cloud of Okay. Legitimacy. Speaker 6: So that legitimacy is the question. Yes. Speaker 3: So that was a very tainted election. And and in that sense, it's it's illegitimate. Speaker 1: Why Why do you think the president is going to such great lengths to essentially prove that he beat you? Because he knows he didn't. He knows he's an illegitimate president. Speaker 6: Stolen email. Stolen drone. Stolen drone. Stolen election. Welcome to the world of unprecedented Trump. So do you believe President Trump is an illegitimate president. Speaker 2: Based on what I just said was I can't for Trump. Speaker 6: He tweeted in February 2018, quote, the more we learn about 2016 election, the more illegitimate it becomes. America deserves to know whether we have a fake president in the Oval Office. Speaker 3: And The rest in attempt to to have the election. And frankly, the FBI is weighing in on the election. I think make the make it makes this election illegitimate. Speaker 1: There was a widespread Understanding that this election was not on the level. We still don't know what really happened, Isaac. I mean, there's just a lot that I think will Be revealed, history will discover, but you don't win by 3,000,000 votes and have all this other shenanigans stuff going on and not come away with An idea like, woah, something's not right here. Speaker 5: Seems to me that there's a cloud of illegitimacy that continues to hang Over 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. Speaker 4: The outcome of the election was affected by their interference. And now we need to know, To what degree, if any, the Trump campaign was actually in collusion Speaker 1: with the Russia? He knows he's an illegitimate president. So of course, he's obsessed That's with me. And I believe that it's a guilty conscience. Speaker 2: We actually won the last presidential election, folks. They stole And Al Gore won that election. I think he won anyway. Actually, I think I carried Florida. Al Gore won the election nationwide Also in Florida, but the Supreme Court ruled the other way. Al Gore got more votes, but not enough to stay out of the Supreme Court where president Bush was elected five four. Speaker 1: Bush versus Gore. A court took away a presidency. Speaker 2: If all the votes were tallied in Florida, Adele Gold would be president today and George Bush would be back in office. Speaker 0: I come from Florida where you and others participated in what I call The United States coup d'etat. Speaker 6: In 2013, according to reports, vice president Joe Biden, he claimed that Al Gore was The one who was elected president. And he claimed that the recount result was, quote, a bad decision. Speaker 2: And never forget, dear friends, what they did in Florida to Al Gore and me, to all of us, to older Americans, to African Americans, to Haitian Americans Deny the right to vote and have those votes counted. Speaker 8: I do believe that projections were right in the 1st place at 7 o'clock when they called Speaker 1: it before. Let me tell you without a doubt. George Bush did not carry Florida and it was not closed. Speaker 2: There's no question that you won Oh, thank you, Charles. No. It's a question. Speaker 4: That's a question. Speaker 2: We will never know because The votes weren't weren't counted. But but and and then in your judgment I mean, that's unfortunate. And there is no other way of saying Let's be very blunt. Al Gore won the state of Florida in 2000, and we should never Forget it. Most Americans or great many Americans don't have confidence that the election of 2000 was fair. Speaker 8: But I don't believe we lost that. I believe we just failed to have all of the votes counted Speaker 4: The Supreme Court elected president. In 2004. Yeah. Al Gore won the state of Florida in 2000, although not the presidency. Speaker 3: We know we won this election. They know we won this election. And Americans know we won this election. Speaker 7: I know some people want you to believe that the Gore Campaign was a campaign that wasn't able to complete its mission. We did. Had all of Speaker 0: those votes been found in Florida, Speaker 8: I Speaker 7: think Al Gore would be president on today. Speaker 2: We had more votes. We won, and we are never going to let the United States Supreme Court choose the president of the United Takes the care. You should know by now based on the fact that he lost the popular vote by more than a half 1000000 voters, And we don't know how many he lost to buy in Florida. There's no doubt in my mind that Al Gore was elected president. Speaker 9: I rise to Object to the fraudulent 25 Florida electoral votes. Speaker 2: Really, we won the election in 2000, but they stole the election. I must object because of the overwhelming evidence of overwhelming evidence of official misconduct, deliberate fraud, and an attempt to The chairman has provided Imran had already Helped the Bush team with such favors as burying their rent a mob to Florida in 2000 to permanently halt of the counting of legally cast ballots. It is Speaker 7: signed by myself on behalf of my diverse constituents and the millions of Americans who have been disenfranchised by Florida's inaccurate vote counts to Supreme Court not to speak with Speaker 4: the United States despite of this election. Speaker 1: Speaking to a Democratic group in Chicago, he said he made it clear he thinks Al Gore was the winner. Speaker 2: The time it was over, our candidate won the popular vote. And the only way that could win the election was to stop the voting and fraud it. Catherine Harris, Jeb Bush, Jim Baker and the Supreme Court hadn't tampered with the results, l Gore would be. President? I think that the issue before us today, is not who won or should have won the 2000 presidential election. That issue has been settled not to my opinion, but it has been settled. Let's just drop the vice president president or not. Al Gore should have been president of the United States. Speaker 10: Al Gore, made it possible for George Bush to be The only appointed president in the history of these United States. Speaker 6: Democrats have won the past 3 presidential elections. In two Speaker 2: 1,000 unions turned out 25% of the vote and Al Gore won. But the Supreme Court hampered? That's a large The Supreme Court stopped the counting of votes, and if they've left the council on, Al Gore would've got the necessary votes. Speaker 0: The Supreme Court selected tent. George w Bush Speaker 2: as the president. He was not elected. There is overwhelming evidence that George w Bush did not win this Election. Speaker 3: What I observed, as a voter, as a citizen of Illinois, 4 years ago were troubling evidence of the fact that not every vote was being counted. Don't think that George w Bush won the election, in 2000 against our goal because I I think he he probably lost Florida and also the nationwide. Speaker 2: If you invite me back on this show Speaker 3: in about 8 weeks, I Speaker 2: think you're gonna learn that No, Roy. I think you get all the votes there. I felt what happened in Florida was a carefully worked out conspiracy. That many things could not go wrong in one state Without there having been a conspiracy, and many, many different things did go wrong. Many tricks were pulled of various kinds. Speaker 8: The vice president did win, but, And I do believe that the majority of voters that intended to to go to polls last year wanted to vote and cast their votes for Al Gore. I do believe that in in in terms of Florida as well. Speaker 2: The court has been supporting formation of the popular will. The most spectacular example being Bush versus Gore, where the majority by a five For a vote and joined the counting of more than a 100,000 ballots in Florida and essentially gave America its 1st court appointed president. A stolen citizen is naked and stolen. Even though Al Gore won the election, he won't take office. Speaker 11: That election was stolen from of the rightful winner. So, mister speaker, I'm here today to talk about a stolen presidential election. Speaker 2: I think in 2000, everybody Talk. Well, he did win the election out of the war. He started dividing America here in Florida By trying to take an election that I think any reasonable person would say he hadn't Actually, one. Speaker 0: What happened in Florida will go down in history As a coup d'etat. Speaker 2: Could we conclude, is it possible There was a conspiracy, and Florida officials were involved in the conspiracy. Never have so many things gone It's too wrong in one place before. Why how do all these things happen all at the same time in the same state? It is not as possible if there was a conspiracy that was very well organized. Why was the state police out there on that Today, election day, checking license plates and and so forth. You know, how did all these things happen in 1 state at one time in 1 election? Is is it possible that Use the word conspiracy and not be afraid of it. Speaker 1: I'm not sure wish Gore was president right now. He should be. Speaker 2: Well, yes, he got elected. Well done. A battle that by the will of the people should have ended in victory. But tens thousands of Florida votes either were not counted or tossed down in the 2000 presidential election. 5 supreme court justices. You've trumped the votes of 51,000,000 Americans. We should've let the entire state be reconned so it was clear, that Al Gore actually won the state of Florida. Speaker 0: And Al War won the election. Speaker 2: We had the election stolen from us. You must admit that. They stole it, And we need a leader to help us get revenge. Speaker 6: I voted for Al Gore. He won the election. Speaker 2: They usurped the the powers as far as being put in it and intervene. It was With the fix as far as we're concerned, you know, it's it's there's no polite way to talk about it except the fix was in. Speaker 0: After the election, when you stole Hold the election. You came back here and say, get over it. No. We're not gonna get over it. Speaker 2: You know it. I know it. They know it. We won that election. Speaker 12: Constantly shifting vote tallies in Ohio and malfunctioning electronic machines, which may not have paper receipts have led to additional loss of confidence by the public. Speaker 2: The right to vote has been stolen from qualified voters. The New Speaker 6: Yorker reported that Kerry thought that, quote, proxies for Bush had rigged many of the voting machines. Speaker 7: In 2004, the democratic process was thwarted. Speaker 2: To The 2004 presidential election in Ohio was riddled with unnecessary problems. Speaker 4: Some machines malfunctioned, causing votes to be counted more than once or not at all. Speaker 2: Based upon an inordinate number of allegations suggesting gross voting rights violations and misconduct, I joined with my colleagues and objective to counting the state of Ohio's electoral votes. As in 2000, the votes of many who wanted to vote were not, in fact, This Speaker 3: last Friday night, I I arranged to meet senator Kerry at a fundraiser to give him a copy of my book. He told me he now thinks the election was stolen. Speaker 1: The wife of John Kerry said she has lingering doubts about the legitimacy of the election. Her theory goes like this. 2 brothers, she calls hard right Republicans, Own 80% of voting machines in the US. Therefore, it would be easy to hack into the mother machines that control the electronic voting. Speaker 7: There were Numerous irregularities in Ohio, including large percentages of projections of provisional balloting, problems with voting machines. Speaker 1: As we look At our election system, I think it's fair to say that there are many legitimate questions about its accuracy, About its integrity. Speaker 12: There are still legitimate concerns over the integrity of our election. Speaker 3: The question obviously is How many instances were not caught that we don't know about? Number 1, we've seen a lot of, what I'll call, honest glitches where it just didn't work right, But also that these machines are hackable. A dishonest employee of the vendor or dishonest employee of the local board of elections or simply someone who knows electronics And as a computer at home, could hack into these machines and then put in the secret instructions to disregard every 20th Democratic voter had 10% to the carrier to the Bush vote or whatever. He might not even know it. Speaker 2: I agree with tens of millions of Americans Who are more very worried that when they cast the ballot on an electronic voting machine, that there There is no paper trail to record that vote. The numerous irregularities that occurred with the electronic voting machines In Ohio on November 2nd last year, point to an unresolved national crisis. Speaker 7: We cannot Clear that Speaker 3: the election of November 2, 2004 was free and clear and transparent and real. There must be independent testing of the voting machines used in Ohio. Speaker 1: I'm not confident that the election in Ohio was barely decided. We know that there was substantial voter suppression, and the machines were not reliable. Speaker 12: The members of Congress who have brought this challenge are speaking up for their agreed constituents, many of whom may have been disenfranchised in this process. Speaker 6: Treating today's electoral vote count in congress as a meaningless ritual would be an insult to our democracy unless we registered our own protest against the obviously fraud voting process that took place in so many Speaker 2: of our states. Voters who wish to cast a vote for president or vice president Can't approach the polls with certainty that their vote will be counted. One of the most significant problems in Ohio and in many other states Was a lack of measures to ensure the integrity of electronic voting machines. In 2004, they caused democratic voters in Ohio to wait for 8 hours before they could cast their ballot. They turned the department of civil rights and the justice department into the voter suppression division with Voter ID laws, voter purging, voter caging, voter intimidation. There aren't gonna be any more election stealing. Speaker 1: Now you have one very Speaker 6: We won. But I Speaker 1: didn't lose. I got the votes, but we won't know exactly how many because of how they cheat it. I did win my election. I just didn't get to have the job. We were robbed of an election. Without voter suppression, Stacey Abrams would be the governor of Georgia. Andrew Gillum is the governor of Florida. Using the Speaker 4: word rigged, using the word steal, do you think it's dangerous going into 2020? Speaker 1: I I don't because we can actually back it up. And so in response What I believe was stolen election. I'm not saying they stole it from me. They stole it from the voters' doors. That's when I was asked if I'm ever gonna concede. The answer is no. If she had a fair election, she already would have won. This is not a speech of concession. This is a step that needs to acknowledge an action that's right, true, or action is right, true or proper. And I will not concede because the erosion of our democracy is not You refuse to concede and say that you lost. Do you stand by that decision today? Absolutely. Speaker 2: If Stacey Abrams doesn't win in Georgia, they Stolen. It's clear. It's clear. Speaker 1: The only election It was not a free and fair I think the election was stolen from the people of Georgia. I believe it was stolen from the voters. Speaker 2: So I Speaker 3: think that Stacey Abrams' election is being stolen from her. Speaker 1: The election was not fair. The process was not fair. Thousands of Georgians had their voices stolen because they were not able to cast ballots. And they cannot be guaranteed that their votes will be counted in 2020 if we don't do this right. Speaker 4: If what happens to you happens nationally and we we see, whoever runs for whoever wins the Democratic nominee. If they say, actually, I can prove that there's a number of votes in every state that that and that's and that's the same thing that you just described happens in multiple states should they concede. Speaker 1: I do not think we should concede an election until we know the results of an election. I still fundamentally believed it could be fair. And that's just not how life works. If it looks like it's cheating, it probably is. If it looks like it's rigged, it probably is. Speaker 2: He would be the governor of Georgia today had the governor of Georgia not disenfranchised 1,400,000 Georgia voters before the election. That's what happened to Stacey Abrams. They took the votes away. Speaker 6: You, notably did not concede. I acknowledge. Okay. You acknowledge That he won, but you did not concede. Correct. 5 months later, do you still feel like your opponent won through voter suppression? Yes. Reminder, she wrote. Brian Kemp stole the gubernatorial election from Georgians and Stacey Abrams. Speaker 1: I said that the election stolen from Georgia voters, the process that took place during the legislative cycle was one that did not countenance and did not pay attention To the deep and real concerns of those who watch this election be stolen in the state of Georgia. It was stolen from the voters of Georgia. Georgia voters did not have their votes Counted. They were not allowed to cast votes. They had Speaker 2: their votes discarded. Certainly gave the appearance of unfairness. I think it was, unfair. Stacy ran a great campaign. Probably won. Speaker 1: And it was not fair to those who filled up absentee ballots. And depending on the county you sent it to, it Either it was counted or not counted, assuming you received it in time. Brian Kemp oversaw for 8 years the systematic and Systemic dismantling of our democracy, and that means there could not be free and fair elections in Georgia. As long as we have eligible American citizens who cannot cast a ballot, Then the game is rigged. I am complicit if I say that that system is fair. Concession in the political space is an acknowledgement that the process This is fair. And I don't believe that to be fair. But I refuse to concede because concession means that the process was proper, that the result was true and And right. And I cannot say that. If I tend to Speaker 0: say I didn't lose, I just didn't win. Speaker 12: And I don't call it a lot. Speaker 1: I just didn't win. Speaker 2: Yes. Yes. Officially. Yes. Officially. Speaker 1: Put it this way. I didn't get to get Inaugurated, next problem. Okay. But will I say that this election was not tainted, was not a disinvestment and a disenfranchisement of thousands of voters? I will not say that. Candidates votes, black and white, lost Their races because they have been deprived of the votes they otherwise would have gotten. And the clearest sample is from next door in Georgia. Stacey Abrams should be governor leading that state right now. I was joking with Beth backstage when she lost. I'm like, no, I just didn't win, because we don't know what really happened because of the miasma of voter suppression. I can't know for a fact that I would be the governor of Georgia, but for the He's in the management of Brian Kemp, but I know it's a pretty good guess. So I can't prove that I would have won, but I know we don't know because of how he behaved. Speaker 3: Is he the legitimate governor elect of Georgia? Speaker 1: He is the person who won an adequate number of votes from the governor. Speaker 2: With all with all due respect, and Speaker 3: I respect where you're coming from and I respect the the issues that you're raising. You're not answering the question. Do you think that Speaker 1: Wait a minute. I no. I what I talked to you Speaker 3: You're not using The word legitimate, is he the legitimate governor elect Georgia? Speaker 1: He is the legal governor of Georgia. He's not here to tell you that just because you win doesn't mean you're won. And you said to that you did not lose. You just did not win. Yes. So we're gonna talk about that. Bad news is that we didn't get the victory we secured. And the thing is we will never know empirically that I got more votes because we will never know which votes did make count. This was not fair. It was not right and it is deeply improper that someone could ascend to that role having performed So basically and so crassly against the very people he is now supposed to represent. The election was not fair. The process was not fair. So you don't feel that you lost fair and I do recognize I am not the governor of Georgia, but I do like to point out something that is true for me and for many in our state. And that is we won. Speaker 2: I'm not saying it's gonna be legit because the increase in the prospect of being illegitimate is a Direct proportions not being able to get these these reforms passed. Speaker 1: Right wing extremists already have a plan to literally seal the next presidential election. Speaker 13: It's not as if it's just Republicans who have monkeed around with elections in the past. Sometimes Democrats have to. Speaker 2: You Speaker 13: know, whenever people are in power, they're, you know, they have this tendency to try to, you know, tilt things in their direction.
mikepompeo
Posted - August 12, 2023 at 8:38 PM
Saved - August 12, 2023 at 8:47 PM

@mikepompeo - Mike Pompeo

The Biden Administration’s politicization of our institutions is devastating.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker believes that the appointment of a Special Counsel is not significant because the person in question, Weiss, previously approved an unprecedented deal. They argue that Weiss is unlikely to investigate the potential corruption of the current president. The speaker suggests that Americans and the rest of the world are puzzled by the criminalization of certain actions. They emphasize the need for a clean Justice Department that represents justice for the American people, criticizing the political nature of the department under President Biden. The speaker also mentions a raid at Mar-a-Lago and a tip to the Bidens, which they believe undermines the central institutions of democracy.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What do you make of all these cases, all of these investigations and how do you think America looks at all this? Speaker 1: Martha, thanks for having me on. Today's announcement of Special Counsel doesn't seem all that special to me. I've been listening to your guests. I think they're precisely right. The fact that it was, in fact, Weiss who signed off on a deal that was unheard of, unprecedented, that prosecutor had to admit it had never been done before, suggests that Weiss is no more likely with his new title, his new role, to investigate the potential corruption of the current president of the United States than he was before he had this title. You know, that's where Americans stare at this. I think they look at these underlying facts and they watch the criminalization of actions that are being taken and they're just puzzled by it. I know the rest of the world is staring at it as well. That means that we have to have a Justice Department that is clean, that represents the American people in justice and not As political as Merrick Garland has made this Justice Department under President Biden, when they see that, when they see a raid at Mar a Lago and a tip To the Bidens, so that they don't find evidence. They that's common sense. That's not political. That's just common sense from any, you know, Simple crime show that somebody watches. They know that's not cricket. That's not right. And that's devastating to the central institutions that have underpinned our democracy for 2 50 years now, Martha.
Destiny15_FL
Posted - August 15, 2023 at 3:20 PM
Saved - August 15, 2023 at 3:41 PM

@Destiny15_FL - Destiny

Everything Democrats do is RIGGED. Democrats are RIGGERS!!!!

dom_lucre
Posted - August 28, 2023 at 8:14 PM
Saved - August 28, 2023 at 9:11 PM

@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

Please make all of these Republicans denying the elections go viral.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers in the video express their belief that the 2016 election was stolen and that Donald Trump is an illegitimate president. They claim that Russia hacked the election and tampered with vote tallies, although there is no credible evidence to support this. They call for the election results to be overturned and for Hillary Clinton to be made president. Some protesters became violent and clashed with police following Trump's election victory. The speakers express anger and frustration towards Trump, calling him a cheater and questioning the validity and credibility of his presidency. They fear that he will be reelected with the help of Russia.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hello. Do you recall getting rid of this? The saving 2015 election was sold. What about the 2016 election? Speaker 1: This was stolen. Speaker 2: Stolen. He's an illegitimate president. He's an illegitimate president. You know, pretending to be president. Why do you think the president is going to such great lengths To essentially prove that he beat you because he didn't. Speaker 1: 1 third of Clinton supporters say Trump election is not legitimate. Speaker 2: You are absolutely right. You can run the best campaign. You can even become the nominee, And you can have the election stolen from you. Speaker 1: The 2016 election was stolen. Speaker 2: Got a Thanks for waiting. Stay back. Today, Russia hacks the election. Russia hacked our election. Russia hacked our election. A little louder, Please. Speaker 1: Russia hacked our election. It was a 9/11 scale event. This was a Speaker 2: kind of cyber 9/11. Yes. It's a cyber 9/11. Yes. Speaker 1: Half of Clinton's voters believe the conspiracy theory that Russia hacked Election day votes. Speaker 2: We know that they were into voting roles. Actual interference with the elections themselves. Speaker 1: We know it happened. Despite no credible evidence, 67% of Democrats believe Russia tampered with vote tally. Speaker 2: Hacking the US Election. Hacking the US election. Russia hacked our elections. The Russia hacked our election. Speaker 1: Russia hacked Speaker 2: our election. Russia hacked our election. Russia hacked Speaker 1: our election. Russian hacking of our election. Hacking of our of our election. Russia hacked our election. Russia hacked our election. Stolen election. Russia hacked Speaker 2: our election. Russia hacked our election. Universal That meant that Russia hacked our election in 2016. Foreign governments hacked our elections. Speaker 1: Most young Americans consider Donald Trump an illegitimate president. Illegitimate president. Speaker 3: It's an illegitimate president. Speaker 1: Why is he illegitimate? He just won an election. Speaker 2: He is an illegitimate president in my mind. Speaker 4: I absolutely agree. Speaker 1: Experts urge Clinton Kent to challenge election results. Speaker 2: We will see how illegitimate his victory actually was. He's an illegitimate president. Speaker 4: Russia hacked our election. Russians hacking our election. Our election. Russia hacking Speaker 2: our election. Speaker 1: Don't see that president elect as a legitimate president. Trump was an illegitimate president who stole the election. He is not a president. Speaker 2: He's illegitimate. And my Biggest fear is that he's gonna do it again with the help of Vlad, his best pal. Terrifying. Speaker 4: Would you be my vice president? Speaker 1: Hillary Clinton voters call to overturn election results. Speaker 2: More than 4,000,000 people have already signed a petition on change .org. Calling for the electors election. Of the electoral college to, quote, ignore their states, vote, and cast their ballots for secretary Clinton. Speaker 4: Trump didn't actually win the election in 2006. Speaker 1: We are the victims of Speaker 3: a bloodless coup. He didn't won the general election. Speaker 1: Yo. Electoral College. Make Hillary Clinton president, period. Donald Trump is an illegitimate president. He's an illegitimate president. And don't accept Trump as a legitimate president. Speaker 2: This wasn't on the level. This election was not on the level. I don't Speaker 1: think he's a legitimate president. He got his victory from cheating. Yes. Trump cheated. Speaker 2: Cheated the 2016 election. He's an illegitimate president. Speaker 1: No validity. No credibility. And because Speaker 4: Anger at what some see as an illegitimate president. Speaker 1: It will not be a peaceful change of power. Speaker 2: A number of incidents turned violent. Protesters hurled trash Can't slash bombs and objects at police. Speaker 4: Several officer injured protesters through rocks and smashed windows leading to more confrontations, Injuries and arrest. Speaker 1: The chaotic scene just blocked outside the security of the inauguration. Speaker 0: Is denied election results is extreme Now? Yeah. Speaker 2: So let's let's be really clear. That comparison that you made is just ridiculous. Protests against Donald Trump's election victory surged overnight, And some became violent. Violence erupted on the streets of Portland during the 2nd straight day of protests over the election of Donald Trump. Some protesters launched fireworks and other projectiles at police. Several people began vandalizing cars. Some demonstrators smashed door windows. Protesters faced off with police in other cities too, including Oakland, Denver, and Minneapolis. Violent protests continuing now for the 3rd day in a row. Some 4,000 angry demonstrators over Trump's election victory taking to the streets. Officers in front of thousands of protesters in what police called a riot. Setting fires, taking their frustrations out Cars and buildings. Stop. Stop. Stop. People threw projectiles and officers and damaged property as well. I do a trash can't happen because I'm angry. No. 1 woman driving through was attacked as someone used a bat They smashed her windshield. They are undermining our democratic process, everything that we stand for.
A1Flipper
Posted - September 3, 2023 at 8:24 PM
Saved - September 4, 2023 at 2:20 PM

@A1Flipper - Vivek's BodyGuard🖐️🇺🇸

Remember when Stacy Abrams was an election denier

Video Transcript AI Summary
I won the election, but they cheated, so we don't know the exact number of votes. It wasn't a fair election, and I won't concede. The election was stolen from the people of Georgia, and we can't let it happen again in 2020. Thousands of Georgians couldn't vote, and their voices were taken away. If it looks like cheating or rigging, it probably is. The legislative process didn't address the concerns of those who saw the election being stolen.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Have one very affirmative statement to make. We won. But I didn't lose. I got the votes, but we won't know exactly how many because of how they cheated. I did win my election. I just didn't get to have the job. We were robbed of an election. Using the word rigged, using the word steal. Do you think it's dangerous going into 2020? I don't because we can actually back it up. And so in response to what I believe was a stolen election. I'm not saying they I spent the interim 10 days between the election and my non concession day, as we call it. Back to when outside asked if I'm ever going to concede. The answer is no. It was not a free and fair election. I think the election was stolen from the people of Georgia. I believe it was stolen from the voters. I just said it can't happen again. Thousands of Georgians had their voices stolen because they were not able to cast ballots. And they cannot be guaranteed that their votes will be counted in 2020 if we don't do this right. I said that the election was stolen from Georgia voters. If it looks like it's cheating it probably is. If it looks like it's rigged, it probably is. The process that took place during the legislative cycle was one that did not the countenance and did not pay attention to the deep and real concerns of those who watch this election be stolen in the state of
GuntherEagleman
Posted - September 21, 2023 at 3:30 PM
Saved - September 23, 2023 at 5:08 PM

@GuntherEagleman - Gunther Eagleman™

The 2020 election was stolen…!

Video Transcript AI Summary
They stopped counting votes on election night to determine the number of real votes and apply mail-in ballots. The speaker believes this would have happened in Texas and considers it fraud. When asked if it could have been a water leak, the speaker insists it was planned and would have occurred in Texas. They question if anyone has ever seen ballots not being counted for three hours while Trump was leading in states. The speaker asserts that anyone could have filled out the mail-in ballots and their origin cannot be determined. When challenged about it being a dangerous conspiracy theory, the speaker claims to have witnessed it happening.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: They stopped counting votes on election night. Speaker 1: Because what they needed to figure out was how many real votes there were so they could figure out how many mail in ballots to apply to the election. That's what they would have done in Texas, I'm convinced. Speaker 0: So you think that was fraud? Speaker 1: Right. I have no doubt, having been through that whole process Speaker 0: It wasn't just a water leak? Speaker 1: It was definitely planned. I mean, it would have happened in Texas. I promise you. Speaker 0: But can you just stop counting ballots on election Tonight, whatever was watching t oh, I know. Speaker 1: Have you ever seen that before, ever? For 3 hours? Speaker 0: Well, you tell me. You're the one who's never seen Speaker 1: it before in my life. I was, like, I knew it when they stopped. And it was and Trump is leading in all these states. I knew exactly what they were doing. Because there's no way to know where those mail in ballots came. Anybody could have filled them out. Anybody. There's no way to know where those ballots came from. Speaker 0: That's that's not a dangerous conspiracy theory. Speaker 1: It's I'm I watched it happen. I was a part
DrLoupis
Posted - October 6, 2023 at 9:17 PM
Saved - October 6, 2023 at 10:01 PM

@DrLoupis - Dr. Anastasia Maria Loupis

The rigged 2020 election destroyed America.

TheRISEofROD
Posted - October 18, 2023 at 3:09 PM
Saved - October 18, 2023 at 3:58 PM

@TheRISEofROD - Machiavelli

Rigged Elections Have Consequences Send this to a democrat: https://t.co/PYRihhS4xc

Video Transcript AI Summary
In a recent 60-minute interview, the speaker expresses strong criticism towards President Joe Biden and his administration. They believe that the administration is corrupt and incompetent, and that Biden is unable to address the issues facing the country. The speaker questions why a disclaimer was placed before the interview and highlights the lack of coherence in Biden's responses. They argue that other countries are not taking the United States seriously, leading to attacks from groups like Hamas. The speaker concludes by suggesting that something catastrophic is imminent and expresses confusion about the current state of affairs.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Sleepy Joe 60 minute interview was the most preposterous, ridiculous, sadden thing I've ever seen on national television and history. This administration is so terrible and they know it. They know it's so much that they decided to take it upon themselves to put a fucking disclaimer before the interview. Now you might be asking yourself, what did the disclaimer actually say? Well, Long story short, it's sugarco. This is the old motherfucker that is incompetent, don't know where he's at, don't know how he got there and don't know what the fuck is going on. They pretty much said, bear with this old corrupt motherfucker. Seen this man sit here and try to justify his wrongdoing for the last 3 years. It's fucking ridiculous. I don't care if you're a liberal, Republican, conservative, independent. I think at this point, we all can agree that this motherfucker and this administration and this government is beyond corrupt. Okay, it can't be no obvious than what the this man had the audacity to sit on TV and say, I can fix it. As if somebody else did this shit. As if somebody else did the inflation or started this war or or or or have all this bullshit that's going on right now as if Trump started it. All this shit happened on your end, sleepy Joe. When you gonna clean up your mess, you don't get if I rerun for pres no. No. We don't want you to rerun for president. No. Go sit your ass down. Y'all have to go see this 60 minute interview. Not for the fact of knowledge, but you all have to see this shit to believe it, man. Other countries are laughing at us. That's why Hamas is attacking because They don't they don't they don't see us serious. There's no backbone. Why? Because this government, this administration has sold us out. It was that simple. This is all over fucking money. This man couldn't even form a co why do you even do an interview if you can't form a coherent sentence? The interview asked some simple ass question. Don't. Don't. Don't. Don't what? Give a fucking reasonable answer to why our country is fucked up. At this point, I I genuinely believe the movie 2012 is coming to life. And here's why. I feel like they're building something to jet the fuck out because something catastrophic is about to happen. This shit ain't making sense. What the hell is going on, man?
RNCResearch
Posted - October 25, 2023 at 4:13 PM
Saved - October 25, 2023 at 8:55 PM

@RNCResearch - RNC Research

ELECTION DENIERS: Here are 24 straight minutes of Democrats denying election results — dating all the way back to 2000. https://t.co/gDnNqfruWD

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers in the video discuss their belief that the 2016 and 2020 elections were stolen or illegitimate due to Russian interference, voter suppression, and issues with electronic voting machines. They express concerns about the integrity of the election process and question the legitimacy of the elected officials. They also mention specific instances, such as the 2000 election and the Georgia gubernatorial race, where they believe the election results were unfair. Overall, they argue that the election system is flawed and needs reform to ensure fair and transparent elections.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You can Speaker 1: run the best campaign. You can even become the nominee. And you can have the election stolen Speaker 2: from you. Speaker 3: How can you win with Russian interference, though? Speaker 2: That's the real thing. Cared about Speaker 1: it in 2020. But rightly. Speaker 2: Because I think I'm taking Speaker 3: an illegitimate president that didn't really win. So how do Speaker 2: you, you know, fight against that in 2020? You are absolutely right. He is an illegitimate president in my mind. Could you Speaker 4: be my vice president for Denimid president in my mind. Speaker 2: Could you be my vice president for candidate? Paul Brooks, I absolutely agree. Trump didn't actually win the election in 2016. He lost the election, and he was put in the office because the Russians interfered. Speaker 5: Russia interfered with our election, attacked our democracy for the sole purpose of artificially placing someone at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, they were successful. Speaker 1: Trump knows he's as an illegitimate president. Speaker 3: The president will elect, although legally elected, is not legitimate. Unless it is president-elect As a legitimate president. Speaker 6: You said you believe that Russia's interference altered the outcome of the election. Speaker 1: I do. We have a president who, if In fact, it is proven, has been assisted by the Russians and may, in fact, not be a legitimate president. The one thing that Trump Is fearful of, when it comes to his being president, is that finally, we will see how illegitimate his victory actually was. Speaker 2: I have an objection. Speaker 7: I object to the 15 votes from the state of North Carolina. I object because people are horrified. Speaker 6: He's an illegitimate president. Our election was hijacked. There is no question. Congress has a duty to hashtag protect our democracy and hashtag follow the facts. Speaker 5: John Lewis is completely right. There is a cloud of legitimacy around the election of Donald Trump. The Russians interfered with his election. James Comey and the FBI interfered with his, Election. The fake news industry interfered with his election. Speaker 1: Trump knows he's an illegitimate president who got illegitimate foreign powers. Do you believe Trump is a legitimate president? Speaker 4: What I believe is that there's no question that the outcome of this election was affected by the Russian interference. Speaker 2: There actually is a cloud of Okay. Legitimacy. Speaker 6: So that legitimacy is the question. Yes. Speaker 3: So that was a very tainted election. And and in that sense, it's it's illegitimate. Speaker 1: Why Why do you think the president is going to such great lengths to essentially prove that he beat you? Because he knows he didn't. He knows he's an illegitimate president. Speaker 6: Stolen email. Stolen drone. Stolen drone. Stolen election. Welcome to the world of unprecedented Trump. So do you believe President Trump is an illegitimate president. Speaker 2: Based on what I just said was I can't for Trump. Speaker 6: He tweeted in February 2018, quote, the more we learn about 2016 election, the more illegitimate it becomes. America deserves to know whether we have a fake president in the Oval Office. Speaker 3: And The rest in attempt to to have the election. And frankly, the FBI is weighing in on the election. I think make the make it makes this election illegitimate. Speaker 1: There was a widespread Understanding that this election was not on the level. We still don't know what really happened, Isaac. I mean, there's just a lot that I think will Be revealed, history will discover, but you don't win by 3,000,000 votes and have all this other shenanigans stuff going on and not come away with An idea like, woah, something's not right here. Speaker 5: Seems to me that there's a cloud of illegitimacy that continues to hang Over 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. Speaker 4: The outcome of the election was affected by their interference. And now we need to know, To what degree, if any, the Trump campaign was actually in collusion Speaker 1: with the Russia? He knows he's an illegitimate president. So of course, he's obsessed That's with me. And I believe that it's a guilty conscience. Speaker 2: We actually won the last presidential election, folks. They stole And Al Gore won that election. I think he won anyway. Actually, I think I carried Florida. Al Gore won the election nationwide Also in Florida, but the Supreme Court ruled the other way. Al Gore got more votes, but not enough to stay out of the Supreme Court where president Bush was elected five four. Speaker 1: Bush versus Gore. A court took away a presidency. Speaker 2: If all the votes were tallied in Florida, Adele Gold would be president today and George Bush would be back in office. Speaker 0: I come from Florida where you and others participated in what I call The United States coup d'etat. Speaker 6: In 2013, according to reports, vice president Joe Biden, he claimed that Al Gore was The one who was elected president. And he claimed that the recount result was, quote, a bad decision. Speaker 2: And never forget, dear friends, what they did in Florida to Al Gore and me, to all of us, to older Americans, to African Americans, to Haitian Americans Deny the right to vote and have those votes counted. Speaker 8: I do believe that projections were right in the 1st place at 7 o'clock when they called Speaker 1: it before. Let me tell you without a doubt. George Bush did not carry Florida and it was not closed. Speaker 2: There's no question that you won Oh, thank you, Charles. No. It's a question. Speaker 4: That's a question. Speaker 2: We will never know because The votes weren't weren't counted. But but and and then in your judgment I mean, that's unfortunate. And there is no other way of saying Let's be very blunt. Al Gore won the state of Florida in 2000, and we should never Forget it. Most Americans or great many Americans don't have confidence that the election of 2000 was fair. Speaker 8: But I don't believe we lost that. I believe we just failed to have all of the votes counted Speaker 4: The Supreme Court elected president. In 2004. Yeah. Al Gore won the state of Florida in 2000, although not the presidency. Speaker 3: We know we won this election. They know we won this election. And Americans know we won this election. Speaker 7: I know some people want you to believe that the Gore Campaign was a campaign that wasn't able to complete its mission. We did. Had all of Speaker 0: those votes been found in Florida, Speaker 8: I Speaker 7: think Al Gore would be president on today. Speaker 2: We had more votes. We won, and we are never going to let the United States Supreme Court choose the president of the United Takes the care. You should know by now based on the fact that he lost the popular vote by more than a half 1000000 voters, And we don't know how many he lost to buy in Florida. There's no doubt in my mind that Al Gore was elected president. Speaker 9: I rise to Object to the fraudulent 25 Florida electoral votes. Speaker 2: Really, we won the election in 2000, but they stole the election. I must object because of the overwhelming evidence of overwhelming evidence of official misconduct, deliberate fraud, and an attempt to The chairman has provided Imran had already Helped the Bush team with such favors as burying their rent a mob to Florida in 2000 to permanently halt of the counting of legally cast ballots. It is Speaker 7: signed by myself on behalf of my diverse constituents and the millions of Americans who have been disenfranchised by Florida's inaccurate vote counts to Supreme Court not to speak with Speaker 4: the United States despite of this election. Speaker 1: Speaking to a Democratic group in Chicago, he said he made it clear he thinks Al Gore was the winner. Speaker 2: The time it was over, our candidate won the popular vote. And the only way that could win the election was to stop the voting and fraud it. Catherine Harris, Jeb Bush, Jim Baker and the Supreme Court hadn't tampered with the results, l Gore would be. President? I think that the issue before us today, is not who won or should have won the 2000 presidential election. That issue has been settled not to my opinion, but it has been settled. Let's just drop the vice president president or not. Al Gore should have been president of the United States. Speaker 10: Al Gore, made it possible for George Bush to be The only appointed president in the history of these United States. Speaker 6: Democrats have won the past 3 presidential elections. In two Speaker 2: 1,000 unions turned out 25% of the vote and Al Gore won. But the Supreme Court hampered? That's a large The Supreme Court stopped the counting of votes, and if they've left the council on, Al Gore would've got the necessary votes. Speaker 0: The Supreme Court selected tent. George w Bush Speaker 2: as the president. He was not elected. There is overwhelming evidence that George w Bush did not win this Election. Speaker 3: What I observed, as a voter, as a citizen of Illinois, 4 years ago were troubling evidence of the fact that not every vote was being counted. Don't think that George w Bush won the election, in 2000 against our goal because I I think he he probably lost Florida and also the nationwide. Speaker 2: If you invite me back on this show Speaker 3: in about 8 weeks, I Speaker 2: think you're gonna learn that No, Roy. I think you get all the votes there. I felt what happened in Florida was a carefully worked out conspiracy. That many things could not go wrong in one state Without there having been a conspiracy, and many, many different things did go wrong. Many tricks were pulled of various kinds. Speaker 8: The vice president did win, but, And I do believe that the majority of voters that intended to to go to polls last year wanted to vote and cast their votes for Al Gore. I do believe that in in in terms of Florida as well. Speaker 2: The court has been supporting formation of the popular will. The most spectacular example being Bush versus Gore, where the majority by a five For a vote and joined the counting of more than a 100,000 ballots in Florida and essentially gave America its 1st court appointed president. A stolen citizen is naked and stolen. Even though Al Gore won the election, he won't take office. Speaker 11: That election was stolen from of the rightful winner. So, mister speaker, I'm here today to talk about a stolen presidential election. Speaker 2: I think in 2000, everybody Talk. Well, he did win the election out of the war. He started dividing America here in Florida By trying to take an election that I think any reasonable person would say he hadn't Actually, one. Speaker 0: What happened in Florida will go down in history As a coup d'etat. Speaker 2: Could we conclude, is it possible There was a conspiracy, and Florida officials were involved in the conspiracy. Never have so many things gone It's too wrong in one place before. Why how do all these things happen all at the same time in the same state? It is not as possible if there was a conspiracy that was very well organized. Why was the state police out there on that Today, election day, checking license plates and and so forth. You know, how did all these things happen in 1 state at one time in 1 election? Is is it possible that Use the word conspiracy and not be afraid of it. Speaker 1: I'm not sure wish Gore was president right now. He should be. Speaker 2: Well, yes, he got elected. Well done. A battle that by the will of the people should have ended in victory. But tens thousands of Florida votes either were not counted or tossed down in the 2000 presidential election. 5 supreme court justices. You've trumped the votes of 51,000,000 Americans. We should've let the entire state be reconned so it was clear, that Al Gore actually won the state of Florida. Speaker 0: And Al War won the election. Speaker 2: We had the election stolen from us. You must admit that. They stole it, And we need a leader to help us get revenge. Speaker 6: I voted for Al Gore. He won the election. Speaker 2: They usurped the the powers as far as being put in it and intervene. It was With the fix as far as we're concerned, you know, it's it's there's no polite way to talk about it except the fix was in. Speaker 0: After the election, when you stole Hold the election. You came back here and say, get over it. No. We're not gonna get over it. Speaker 2: You know it. I know it. They know it. We won that election. Speaker 12: Constantly shifting vote tallies in Ohio and malfunctioning electronic machines, which may not have paper receipts have led to additional loss of confidence by the public. Speaker 2: The right to vote has been stolen from qualified voters. The New Speaker 6: Yorker reported that Kerry thought that, quote, proxies for Bush had rigged many of the voting machines. Speaker 7: In 2004, the democratic process was thwarted. Speaker 2: To The 2004 presidential election in Ohio was riddled with unnecessary problems. Speaker 4: Some machines malfunctioned, causing votes to be counted more than once or not at all. Speaker 2: Based upon an inordinate number of allegations suggesting gross voting rights violations and misconduct, I joined with my colleagues and objective to counting the state of Ohio's electoral votes. As in 2000, the votes of many who wanted to vote were not, in fact, This Speaker 3: last Friday night, I I arranged to meet senator Kerry at a fundraiser to give him a copy of my book. He told me he now thinks the election was stolen. Speaker 1: The wife of John Kerry said she has lingering doubts about the legitimacy of the election. Her theory goes like this. 2 brothers, she calls hard right Republicans, Own 80% of voting machines in the US. Therefore, it would be easy to hack into the mother machines that control the electronic voting. Speaker 7: There were Numerous irregularities in Ohio, including large percentages of projections of provisional balloting, problems with voting machines. Speaker 1: As we look At our election system, I think it's fair to say that there are many legitimate questions about its accuracy, About its integrity. Speaker 12: There are still legitimate concerns over the integrity of our election. Speaker 3: The question obviously is How many instances were not caught that we don't know about? Number 1, we've seen a lot of, what I'll call, honest glitches where it just didn't work right, But also that these machines are hackable. A dishonest employee of the vendor or dishonest employee of the local board of elections or simply someone who knows electronics And as a computer at home, could hack into these machines and then put in the secret instructions to disregard every 20th Democratic voter had 10% to the carrier to the Bush vote or whatever. He might not even know it. Speaker 2: I agree with tens of millions of Americans Who are more very worried that when they cast the ballot on an electronic voting machine, that there There is no paper trail to record that vote. The numerous irregularities that occurred with the electronic voting machines In Ohio on November 2nd last year, point to an unresolved national crisis. Speaker 7: We cannot Clear that Speaker 3: the election of November 2, 2004 was free and clear and transparent and real. There must be independent testing of the voting machines used in Ohio. Speaker 1: I'm not confident that the election in Ohio was barely decided. We know that there was substantial voter suppression, and the machines were not reliable. Speaker 12: The members of Congress who have brought this challenge are speaking up for their agreed constituents, many of whom may have been disenfranchised in this process. Speaker 6: Treating today's electoral vote count in congress as a meaningless ritual would be an insult to our democracy unless we registered our own protest against the obviously fraud voting process that took place in so many Speaker 2: of our states. Voters who wish to cast a vote for president or vice president Can't approach the polls with certainty that their vote will be counted. One of the most significant problems in Ohio and in many other states Was a lack of measures to ensure the integrity of electronic voting machines. In 2004, they caused democratic voters in Ohio to wait for 8 hours before they could cast their ballot. They turned the department of civil rights and the justice department into the voter suppression division with Voter ID laws, voter purging, voter caging, voter intimidation. There aren't gonna be any more election stealing. Speaker 1: Now you have one very Speaker 6: We won. But I Speaker 1: didn't lose. I got the votes, but we won't know exactly how many because of how they cheat it. I did win my election. I just didn't get to have the job. We were robbed of an election. Without voter suppression, Stacey Abrams would be the governor of Georgia. Andrew Gillum is the governor of Florida. Using the Speaker 4: word rigged, using the word steal, do you think it's dangerous going into 2020? Speaker 1: I I don't because we can actually back it up. And so in response What I believe was stolen election. I'm not saying they stole it from me. They stole it from the voters' doors. That's when I was asked if I'm ever gonna concede. The answer is no. If she had a fair election, she already would have won. This is not a speech of concession. This is a step that needs to acknowledge an action that's right, true, or action is right, true or proper. And I will not concede because the erosion of our democracy is not You refuse to concede and say that you lost. Do you stand by that decision today? Absolutely. Speaker 2: If Stacey Abrams doesn't win in Georgia, they Stolen. It's clear. It's clear. Speaker 1: The only election It was not a free and fair I think the election was stolen from the people of Georgia. I believe it was stolen from the voters. Speaker 2: So I Speaker 3: think that Stacey Abrams' election is being stolen from her. Speaker 1: The election was not fair. The process was not fair. Thousands of Georgians had their voices stolen because they were not able to cast ballots. And they cannot be guaranteed that their votes will be counted in 2020 if we don't do this right. Speaker 4: If what happens to you happens nationally and we we see, whoever runs for whoever wins the Democratic nominee. If they say, actually, I can prove that there's a number of votes in every state that that and that's and that's the same thing that you just described happens in multiple states should they concede. Speaker 1: I do not think we should concede an election until we know the results of an election. I still fundamentally believed it could be fair. And that's just not how life works. If it looks like it's cheating, it probably is. If it looks like it's rigged, it probably is. Speaker 2: He would be the governor of Georgia today had the governor of Georgia not disenfranchised 1,400,000 Georgia voters before the election. That's what happened to Stacey Abrams. They took the votes away. Speaker 6: You, notably did not concede. I acknowledge. Okay. You acknowledge That he won, but you did not concede. Correct. 5 months later, do you still feel like your opponent won through voter suppression? Yes. Reminder, she wrote. Brian Kemp stole the gubernatorial election from Georgians and Stacey Abrams. Speaker 1: I said that the election stolen from Georgia voters, the process that took place during the legislative cycle was one that did not countenance and did not pay attention To the deep and real concerns of those who watch this election be stolen in the state of Georgia. It was stolen from the voters of Georgia. Georgia voters did not have their votes Counted. They were not allowed to cast votes. They had Speaker 2: their votes discarded. Certainly gave the appearance of unfairness. I think it was, unfair. Stacy ran a great campaign. Probably won. Speaker 1: And it was not fair to those who filled up absentee ballots. And depending on the county you sent it to, it Either it was counted or not counted, assuming you received it in time. Brian Kemp oversaw for 8 years the systematic and Systemic dismantling of our democracy, and that means there could not be free and fair elections in Georgia. As long as we have eligible American citizens who cannot cast a ballot, Then the game is rigged. I am complicit if I say that that system is fair. Concession in the political space is an acknowledgement that the process This is fair. And I don't believe that to be fair. But I refuse to concede because concession means that the process was proper, that the result was true and And right. And I cannot say that. If I tend to Speaker 0: say I didn't lose, I just didn't win. Speaker 12: And I don't call it a lot. Speaker 1: I just didn't win. Speaker 2: Yes. Yes. Officially. Yes. Officially. Speaker 1: Put it this way. I didn't get to get Inaugurated, next problem. Okay. But will I say that this election was not tainted, was not a disinvestment and a disenfranchisement of thousands of voters? I will not say that. Candidates votes, black and white, lost Their races because they have been deprived of the votes they otherwise would have gotten. And the clearest sample is from next door in Georgia. Stacey Abrams should be governor leading that state right now. I was joking with Beth backstage when she lost. I'm like, no, I just didn't win, because we don't know what really happened because of the miasma of voter suppression. I can't know for a fact that I would be the governor of Georgia, but for the He's in the management of Brian Kemp, but I know it's a pretty good guess. So I can't prove that I would have won, but I know we don't know because of how he behaved. Speaker 3: Is he the legitimate governor elect of Georgia? Speaker 1: He is the person who won an adequate number of votes from the governor. Speaker 2: With all with all due respect, and Speaker 3: I respect where you're coming from and I respect the the issues that you're raising. You're not answering the question. Do you think that Speaker 1: Wait a minute. I no. I what I talked to you Speaker 3: You're not using The word legitimate, is he the legitimate governor elect Georgia? Speaker 1: He is the legal governor of Georgia. He's not here to tell you that just because you win doesn't mean you're won. And you said to that you did not lose. You just did not win. Yes. So we're gonna talk about that. Bad news is that we didn't get the victory we secured. And the thing is we will never know empirically that I got more votes because we will never know which votes did make count. This was not fair. It was not right and it is deeply improper that someone could ascend to that role having performed So basically and so crassly against the very people he is now supposed to represent. The election was not fair. The process was not fair. So you don't feel that you lost fair and I do recognize I am not the governor of Georgia, but I do like to point out something that is true for me and for many in our state. And that is we won. Speaker 2: I'm not saying it's gonna be legit because the increase in the prospect of being illegitimate is a Direct proportions not being able to get these these reforms passed. Speaker 1: Right wing extremists already have a plan to literally seal the next presidential election. Speaker 13: It's not as if it's just Republicans who have monkeed around with elections in the past. Sometimes Democrats have to. Speaker 2: You Speaker 13: know, whenever people are in power, they're, you know, they have this tendency to try to, you know, tilt things in their direction.
MarcLobliner
Posted - November 3, 2023 at 2:48 AM
Saved - November 3, 2023 at 2:58 PM

@MarcLobliner - Marc Lobliner - IFBB Pro

Election fraud appears to be rampant. What if the 2020….. Nevermind

NetworksManager
Posted - November 11, 2023 at 8:30 AM
Saved - November 11, 2023 at 10:23 PM

@NetworksManager - Bruce Porter Jr. 

It is proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that the 2020 US Election was stolen. It's time to stand up American Man. STAND UP https://t.co/xDlbwfYNOB https://t.co/NmFI0qNyUG

Video Transcript AI Summary
In May, an alarm went off in a warehouse in Fulton County, Georgia, where evidence related to voter fraud in the 2020 election was stored. Deputies guarding the warehouse had left their posts, and when they returned, they found the door open. It was later discovered that at least 36 batches of mail-in ballots were double counted, totaling over 4,000 votes. The Atlanta Journal Constitution also found that hundreds of ballots were improperly duplicated. Surveillance footage showed ballots being scanned multiple times, but the county claims these were isolated incidents. Audit tally sheets were falsified, and photographs showed unfolded ballots filled out by a printer. Additionally, thousands of voters who had moved out of their county still voted illegally. The lack of transparency and irregularities undermine trust in the election system.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: On a Saturday night in late May of this year, an alarm sounded in a big nondescript warehouse in Fulton County, Georgia. The warehouse was an unlikely place for a burglary. It It was under round the clock surveillance by both private security and local law enforcement, including armed deputies with the Fulton County Sheriff's Office. Any unauthorized Person entering from the outside would have to get past a locked 100 pound steel door, as well as a maze of motion detectors. Not easy. But someone tried to do it anyway and at just the perfect moment, 20 minutes after deputies in charge of guarding the warehouse left their posts. By the time those deputies returned to check out the alarm, someone had opened the 100 pound door to the warehouse. So what Happened that night and why? We still don't know. It's also not clear why the deputies left the warehouse or who took advantage of their absence. We do know that a lot of people might have had reason to try to get inside the warehouse. Depending on who you ask, the building contains evidence that either confirms or refutes the claim That voter fraud affected the outcome of the 2020 election in the state of Georgia. Georgia is a place that Joe Biden won by fewer than 13,000 votes. That warehouse holds more than a 140,000 absentee ballots. Now, what's interesting is that for reasons that are Shealy has been pushing for transparency. He's filed suit for the right to see those ballots. He hasn't seen them all yet, but what he's So far demands an explanation. All of us, no matter who you voted for, should wanna hear that explanation. You can't have a democracy if the public doesn't believe election results. Increasingly, many people in this country don't believe them. The Solution to that problem and it's a significant problem is not to scream at these people, call them lunatics or throw them in jail. The solution is to tell the truth about what happened. The only way to restore trust in our system is with facts. So what are the facts about the election in Fulton County, Georgia? Well, here's the official version. In May, the chairman of the Fulton County Board of Commissioners, a man called Rob Pitts, explained that it was not necessary to look at the ballots. In fact, it was ridiculous even to ask to look at the ballots because there already been plenty of recounts and all the recounts reach the same conclusion. Here's what Pitts said. If it sounds familiar as you hear it, that's because so many other people in authority have been saying pretty much the same thing. Speaker 1: I mean, I'm really baffled about this. What do they want? We've had 3 counts already. The elections in Fulton County, Georgia, they were open, they were fair, and they were transparent. The votes have been certified. The elections have the election has been certified, so it's over. This will be the 4th one, and I can guarantee you that the results will be of this one will be Just like the results were for count 1, count 2, and count 3. No change. Again, our elections are open, fair, and transparent. Speaker 0: I can guarantee you. We already know what happened. We've counted those same ballots 4 times. The election's been certified. Stop already. And that's the argument that Fulton County has used in court to keep those ballots locked away in a warehouse. Except it's not true. It now There actually was meaningful voter fraud in Fulton County, Georgia last November. That is not a conspiracy theory. It's true. From the beginning, this show has tried to be fact based when we talk about the 2020 election results. So here's what we know tonight, factually. At least 36 batches of mail in ballots from the November election were double counted in Fulton County. That's a total of more than 4,000 votes. Those numbers It's come from a group called Voter GA, which along with Bob Chielly sued to get them. The final tally from the double counts we know about amounts to more than 33 100 votes for Joe Biden and 865 votes for Donald Trump. Now before you dismiss Bob Chielly and voter GA as dishonest partisan actors, Keep in mind that the strongly left of center Atlanta Journal Constitution appears to agree with this, at least in outline. The newspaper reviewed the available digital ballot images independently and concluded that hundreds of ballots were improperly duplicated. What does that look like exactly? Well, here's what it looks like. At a press conference yesterday, a consultant with voter GA called David Cross showed how we can be certain that votes in Fulton County were counted more than once. Watch. Speaker 2: What I'm gonna show you here is 2 ballots side by side. One of them is marked for Jason Shaw. It's got a little squiggle mark next to it. You can see it's got the identical mark on the second one. And the ballot image Image is stored up here on the top left. So this one over here is scanner 5162. That's scanner number 3. Fax number 235, image number 19. And that matches 234, image 59. So you have the same ballot counted twice in the images and counted In the audit. How that's possible? I don't know. Speaker 0: How's that possible? I don't know. Every About a couple of ballots here. We're talking about a lot of ballots. At least hundreds of ballots involved. Enough potentially to affect The outcome of the election. Here's another example. Here's one Speaker 2: of the next ones. Alright. So same facts number 234, number 2 and two thirty five, the number 61, Republican, Republican, Republican, Republican, All the way down to the point where this little spot up in Fannie Willis matches this one over here. So question that that ballot was counted twice. Speaker 0: So what's the explanation for this? Well, if you ask Fulton County, these discrepancies, the ones you just saw on the screen, were isolated incidents. Just a handful of bad ballots Happens all the time. The county claims that any errors were caught in previous recounts. The problem is that neither one of those claims is true. Surveillance footage obtained by voter GA appears to show large numbers of ballots being scanned multiple times. Pay The tape we're showing you to the woman wearing yellow at the desk. According to voter GA, she slides ballots into a scanning machine, removes the ballots, and then reinserts the same ballots. This happens multiple times. The question is, how many times were those ballots counted? Was each vote counted more than once? Fulton County won't answer that question. Now one way to know the answer would be to check what are called audit tally sheets. Tellingly, for months after the presidential election, Fulton County failed to provide more than a 100,000 of those tally sheets, including 50,000 of them for mail in ballots. When voter GA finally forced Fulton County to turn over the tally sheets, the conclusion was stunning. Here's what the audit found. Quote, 7 falsified audit tally sheets containing fabricated vote totals. For example, a batch Containing 59 actual ballot images for Joe Biden and 42 for Donald Trump was reported as a 100 for Biden and 0 for Trump. The 7 batches of ballot images with 554 votes for Joe Biden, 140 votes for Donald Trump and 11 votes for Joe Jorgensen had tally sheets in the It falsified to show 850 votes for Biden, 0 votes for Trump, and 0 votes for Jorgensen. Wait, did you just follow that? How is that not flat out criminal fraud? We'd love to know because it certainly sounds like flat out Criminal fraud. We've obtained photographs showing what went on during the recount process for mail in ballots at Fulton County. These pictures were taken by a whistleblower who participated in the recount. She said she noticed something odd as she did. None of the ballots that she saw had any creases on them. You can see the stacks to have unfolded ballots on your screen now. That's strange because of course mail in ballots need to be bent in order to be mailed in. These ballots clearly had never been inside an envelope. And then the whistleblower noticed something else. All of the ballots the whistleblower tells us have been filled out by a printer, not by hand. And many of them supported the exact same candidates, Democrats, including Joe Biden. Voter GA detected a series of other apparent irregularities in the recount. The group's audit found, for example, that quote, over 200 Fulton County mail in ballot Images contained votes that were not included in the hand count audit results for the November election. Now why is that? We don't know. Keep in mind, once again, the results in the state of Georgia were decided by fewer than 13,000 votes. It was a close race. Every vote mattered. And then there's this. An elections expert called Mark Davis analyzed data from the post office. He found that nearly 35 1,000 Georgia voters moved out of their county of residence more than a month prior to election day. They were ineligible to vote, and yet they did. They still voted in their old county. That is illegal. It's not a small thing. Violating election law is something we should care about. And by law, Their votes should have been excluded from the total, but they were not excluded. Why are we okay with that? Why are we okay with any of this? We're okay with it because we've been told we have to be okay with it. We're undermining democracy if we ask questions about what happened during the 2020 election. And And of course, that's a perfect inversion of the truth. Without answers to legitimate questions like the ones we just posed, and those are legitimate questions, democracy dies. People begin to understand the system they've been told is on the level is in fact rigged. And when they believe that, God knows what they do next. So let's find out what Surely happened. Let's find out immediately. Let's find out without shame. It's our right to know. It's our responsibility to know.

@NetworksManager - Bruce Porter Jr. 

We had a coup in 2020. Democrats & intelligence community cheated voters stealing presidential election overthrowing government. They brought in military occupying the Capitol for nearly a year, installed illegitimate Joe Biden and censored all opposition. https://t.co/nRU52LXlzC

Video Transcript AI Summary
There are over 7,000 deployed troops in Washington DC, barricading the area. Soldiers can be seen on every corner, and the military presence is significant. The speaker expresses surprise and asks for viewers' thoughts. They emphasize the large number of troops and comment that they are the "good guys."
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Okay, guys. Just got intel off the streets from these soldiers. We're we're right next to the capital of United States. It's all barricaded up. There's soldiers on every corner. You guys can see here's Washington DC right now in real time. They're here. The military is here. So we just got word from one of these guys that there is over 7,000, deployed troops inside Washington DC. Now, they're everywhere. You guys can see it on every they're on every corner. Corner. The military is here in Washington, DC. What do you think this is? Feel free to comment. They're everywhere. Wow. Look at them coming. Holy smokes. Look at them all. Holy shit. Look at them all. These are the good guys. These are the good guys.
GuntherEagleman
Posted - November 16, 2023 at 1:06 PM
Saved - November 17, 2023 at 12:43 AM

@GuntherEagleman - Gunther Eagleman™

The democrats stole the 2020 election… 👇🏼https://t.co/YmVmKyd4uy

Video Transcript AI Summary
The accounting center was moved from the courthouse in Media, Pennsylvania to the Wharf in Chester, Pennsylvania at a cost of $2.1 million. The center is located in a parking lot near loading docks and has connections to Power HRG and Super Youth Park Soccer Stadium. There were concerns about a backroom where there were no observers and no transparency. It took a lawyer's injunction to gain access, but even then, they were only allowed 5 minutes every 2 hours. The speaker emphasizes the importance of transparency and truth in the electoral process and hopes for swift justice for anyone involved in fraudulent activity. They express the frustration and determination of Americans to defend the country.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The $2,100,000 spent to move the accounting center from the courthouse in Media, Pennsylvania, which has been something that has been done for for decades, to the Wharf in Chester, Pennsylvania. Let me explain to you the layout of the accounting center. It is in the middle of a huge parking lot, which sits back on Seaport Drive next to loading docks. It has multimillion dollar connections to the company Power HRG and Super Youth Park Soccer Stadium. The accounting center was on the 1st floor in which there were multiple places to bring in ballots in and out of elevators in many rooms in which workers had access. I was there for 3 straight days. What became of concern was the backroom which had had no observers, no line of sight or transparency into the process. There was no cooperation, complete resistance from election night and every day after. It took until our lawyer got an injunction to get into that backroom in which pre canvassing was transpiring. Even with an injunction which was a joke, we were granted 5 minutes every 2 hours, and the setup was sitting in a chair 20 feet from any physical ballot. I truly wish I had enough time today to to recreate what I witnessed and felt during those moments. But we did not gather here today just for me and my experience, but rather a collection of experience experiences from Americans like myself. What I hope to achieve is for the public to understand is what we is that we have stuck our necks out, have been intimidated, threatened, bullied, has spent countless hours away from our families, friends, and jobs. We have signed affidavits under penalty of perjury, which should be consideration enough to know that this is a very serious issue. I'm here for one thing only and that is to speak the truth. This is not about party. This is about my country. Every American deserves transparency, truth and be able to question those in power without fear of intimidation, bullying or backlash. I hope this committee takes action if needed, and justice will be swift to anyone involved in fraudulent activity. The republic is angry, disgruntled, tired, beaten up, and ready to defend this country.
robreiner
Posted - November 17, 2023 at 3:11 PM
Saved - November 17, 2023 at 9:16 PM

@robreiner - Rob Reiner

If you vote for anyone but Joe Biden, you are voting to destroy American Democracy.

GhostofBPH
Posted - November 29, 2023 at 5:00 AM
Saved - November 29, 2023 at 2:24 PM

@GhostofBPH - GBPH

The elections are rigged. Anybody who refuses to discuss election integrity is either stupid or a schemer.

@MikeBenzCyber - Mike Benz

The 5 minute summary of how DHS rigged the 2020 election through mass censorship of Joe Biden's political rivals. https://t.co/L0RN4MBSSW

Video Transcript AI Summary
Stanford University, University of Washington, Graphica, and the Atlantic Council were used as a front by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to manipulate social media during the 2020 election. The goal was to censor posts containing misinformation about mail-in ballots and other election-related topics. DHS lacked the legal authority to directly censor, so they set up the Election Infrastructure Partnership (EIP) to fill the gaps. These outside organizations received federal funding and worked closely with DHS to ban or throttle millions of posts and accounts. The entire operation was orchestrated to rig the election. The question now is whether there will be political accountability for these actions.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Stanford University, University of Washington, Graphica, and the Atlantic Council, and their service as a cutout to get, to do through the backdoor what Department of Homeland Security and the rest of these alphabet soup, national security, law enforcement agencies couldn't do through the front door. Speaker 1: That's exactly right. So you had this never Trump cabal within the Department of Homeland Security, by the way, I'm not even saying To be partisan, if it was a Bernie Sanders who had won, they would have, they would have, done a deep state coup from the populous left. I mean, this is they they're sensitive about their right and their left populous blank. So basically you had this, this early period in 2020 where they were afraid Trump was going to win the election And they decided they need to rig social media because Trump won in 2016 on the basis of the social media strength. And so you had this foreign policy cutout coup within this cybersecurity, this obscure little cybersecurity sub agency within DHS. This is what we just talked about in the previous segment. They defined social media posts, if they contain misinformation as being an attack on critical infrastructure sure of the US Federal Government. Cause they defined elections to be critical infrastructure. So CS, this, this little, This little cybersecurity sub agency called SISA, it developed a long arm jurisdiction over your opinions about the election on social media by saying if you speak misinformation about mail in ballots, if you say that they are not safe and effective, then then you are committing a cyber attack on the critical infrastructure of American elections and so DHS has the ability to censor you. Now they knew they couldn't pull this off directly because of the First Amendment. And in fact, the head of the IP, Alex Stamos was, is on tape and my foundation, Foundation For Freedom Online ended up catching this and clipping it saying that DHS at the time knew that they lacked the legal authorization to censor directly. So they set up EIP in order to fill the gaps of what government could not do itself. And so you had these outside organizations that were given not just, federal funding in large part of the Atlanta Council, the Digital and, and Graphica are both federally funded, both the universities involved, Stanford The new w ended up getting a joint $3,000,000 grant shortly after the election. And they essentially got paid off for, for doing the, for getting the administration into office. And what they did is DHS worked closely with this outside cut out consortium of those 4 entities in order to get essentially hundreds of millions of posts and tens of thousands of counts either banned or throttled this massively rigged the entire election cycle. This is started in June, 2020. They got 22,000,000 tweets Labeled misinformation because they bragged on tape about coercing the tech companies through inducing crisis PR and threatening to have the government break them up on both antitrust and other regulatory grounds if they did not censor Trump supporters in, ahead of the 2020 election. Now they didn't use the phrase Trump supporters. They said, anyone who questions mail in ballots, Anyone who question who talks about ballot harvesting, anyone who talks about ballot trafficking and anyone who's got a problem with vote tabulation on election day. I mean, this is the perfect Cover up, if you were doing dirty deeds, by the way, they basically had the people, in charge of administering the election were also in charge of Sensoring all questions about the administration of the election. If this happened in a third world country, the state department would, immediately pass international sanctions on such a country and declared its elections to be invalid, but this was architected within the bowels of our own Department of Homeland Security, who is a final note I should add, was deliberately set up to model a domestic CIA, the Stanford, Internet observatories, Renee de Resta, who started her career in the CIA It was, they were the primary, leader of the EIP partnership bragged on tape at a DHS This information conference shortly after the election that they knew that they couldn't set up a DHS censorship cell inside the The CIA because the CIA is foreign facing and they couldn't do it within the FBI because the FBI requires a law breaking predicate because it's attached to the justice department. So they created base, they gave DHS the foreign facing dirty tricks powers of the CIA with the domestic jurisdiction of the FBI, but evading the FBI restrictions by putting it at DHS. So this whole thing was orchestrated top to bottom. They knew it was dirty, from jump street and now they're getting caught. But question is, is there a political will to hold them accountable?
kylenabecker
Posted - December 2, 2023 at 6:00 PM
Saved - December 2, 2023 at 6:06 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Voting for Trump in 2024 is crucial for America's future. Despite his critics, Trump's enemies are worse. Fearmongering about his threat to democracy is baseless, as his four years in office brought peace, prosperity, and lower taxes. If he were a dictator, he would have weaponized the government like Democrats are doing now. Many oppose Trump without questioning the lies and propaganda against him, which could be a fatal mistake. The Capitol riot narrative falls apart under scrutiny. Trump even stated he would step down after the election was certified. Americans must reject propaganda, fight for election integrity, and stand up for free speech. Not voting for Trump in 2024 would be detrimental to America's future.

@kylenabecker - Kyle Becker

America is 'Over' If You Don't Vote for Trump in 2024 Voting for Trump is a moral imperative in 2024. Americans must put their feelings aside. It is crucial to be objective and grasp what is at stake. No matter what you feel about Trump's 'style,' his political enemies are infinitely worse. The biggest 'tell' his enemies are liars about Trump's supposed 'threat to democracy' is he already spent four years in office. All of the fearmongering about Trump dissolves in light of the fact we enjoyed four years of peace, prosperity, energy independence, lower taxes, border sanity, and non-weaponized government. If Trump were a 'fascist' dictator, he would have weaponized the federal government against his enemies in the exact same way that Democrats are doing against him now. Most people who oppose Trump do so because they feel that he is bad for the country. They don't question the overwhelming barrage of provable lies and debunkable propaganda that has been unleashed against him. This could prove to be a fatal mistake for the country. The Corrupt Media painted Trump as an "authoritarian" dictator with 90% negative news, which proves the exact point that he wasn't an authoritarian dictator. What about J6? Donald Trump is blamed for the Capitol riot on January 6, where we are supposed to believe that because the president gave a relatively benign speech, he had anything to do with unarmed extremists, who killed exactly no one, 'storming the capitol' in a pre-planned siege, with the full knowledge of the FBI and despite advance warnings, in order to disrupt the election objections in Congress in some vain, inexplicable bid to hold on to power. This narrative makes exactly zero sense after even a modicum of serious scrutiny. When you question the official narrative about the J6 "insurrection," it crumbles into sand. After the 2020 election was certified, Trump said on Jan. 7 he would step down so Biden would become the next president. Some "coup." Thus, it is irrelevant if he said the election was "rigged" or "stolen." Democrats like Hillary Clinton and Al Gore and Barack Obama have been saying similar things about elections for years. None of them are being prosecuted, let alone in a blatant act of election interference. Americans have to stop putting up with this incessant stream of nonsense propaganda coming out of the U.S. government. They must reject the "fortifying" of elections by a shadowy, corporatist cabal. They must stand up to the censorship of regime critics. They must not tolerate attacks on free speech. They must continue to fight for election integrity. This leads us all to one inescapable conclusion. America is over if you don't vote for Trump in 2024.

TuckerCarlson
Posted - December 20, 2023 at 8:48 PM
Saved - December 20, 2023 at 10:56 PM

@TuckerCarlson - Tucker Carlson

The actual end of democracy. https://t.co/OXA4SHnNug

Video Transcript AI Summary
On January 6th, there was no Trump-led insurrection as claimed by some. The crowd had no weapons or plan to overthrow the government. Trump himself was at the White House, calling for calm. However, a Colorado Supreme Court ruling cited the 14th Amendment to bar Trump from appearing on the state's ballot, despite no conviction of insurrection. This decision was seen as lunacy, especially when compared to the loss of the US's moral authority abroad. The left celebrated this ruling, with some expressing gratitude to unelected judges for overriding voters' desires. The Colorado Secretary of State, Jenna Griswold, stated on MSNBC that accusations on television are now enough to remove a presidential candidate. This erosion of due process and the rule of law raises concerns about the state of democracy.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This was pretty puzzling to watch. Whatever else January 6th was, and in some ways, we still don't know exactly what it was, it was not a Trump led insurrection. The crowd had no guns. They had no plan to overthrow the government. Nothing like that has ever emerged. And above all, Trump was not leading it. He was miles away at the White House at the time where he issued a public statement calling for calm and nonviolence. So why were the people on television telling us that Trump led an insurrection? This was, of course, a lie, but it was also a very obvious lie. So, clearly, we are watching the rollout of a talking point, words crafted for a specific purpose. But what was the purpose? We got an answer to that question yesterday when the Colorado Supreme Court ruled that because he led an insurrection, Donald Trump's then cannot appear on the state's ballot next fall. The 4 liberal judges who concluded this cited as their justification article Three of the 14th Amendment, which was written in 18/68 to keep former Confederate officials from holding office. That was the sum total of their reasoning. Despite the fact Donald Trump has never been convicted by any court of insurrection, and although the 14th amendment specifically does not apply to the presidency, Donald Trump cannot run for president because he's an insurrectionist. This seemed like lunacy because it was lunacy. 3000 miles away in El Salvador, there was no question about what was happening. The United States has lost its ability to lecture any other country about, quote, democracy, wrote Salvadoran president Nadeem Bukele. And yet in this country, no one on the left dared say that. Instead, Donald Trump's enemies celebrated. The Atlantic magazine expressed gratitude that unelected judges had, quote, rescued the country from the desires of voters because, actually, that's democracy. And then there was Jenna Griswold. That's the Colorado Secretary of State. You may not have seen her before, but you will instantly recognize the category she represents. Unhappy 39 year old liberal women with Ivy League degrees and a deep streak of authoritarian impulses. Here's Griswold on MSNBC last night explaining that a conventional legal process is no longer necessary for the left to get its way. No more trials or evidence or jury verdicts. An accusation made on television is now enough to remove a front runner from the presidential race. If Nancy Pelosi and Joe Scarborough call you bad, Americans are not allowed to vote for you. Watch. Speaker 1: Look. I believe he incited the insurrection. There were big questions around section 3 of the 14th amendment, and the Colorado Supreme Court has weighed in in a very loud way, making themselves clear. Frankly, we've never had a president try to steal the presidency and engage in insurrection, ever before. So Trump's actions are unprecedented. The Colorado Supreme Court confirmed that the district court got it right, that he did engage in insurrection. Yeah. I think, section 3 of the 14th amendment has to apply to the presidency because if not, it's a get out of jail free card. And in a country of laws where no man is above another, we can't have one office Be able to do whatever they want when it comes to rebellion and then be able to be seated in office again. Speaker 0: None of this seems very American. All that looks like the actual end of democracy.
JoeBiden
Posted - June 28, 2024 at 5:42 PM
Saved - July 14, 2024 at 8:48 PM

@JoeBiden - Joe Biden

Donald Trump is a genuine threat to this nation. He's a threat to our freedom. He's a threat to our democracy. He's literally a threat to everything America stands for.

KanekoaTheGreat
Posted - July 22, 2024 at 6:33 PM
Saved - July 23, 2024 at 2:22 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I question whether actions by U.S. intelligence agencies regarding the Russiagate narrative, the rigging of the Democratic primary elections, and the censorship of the Biden laptop constitute insurrections against democracy. I point out that the Democratic Party has seemingly celebrated these events, including the violent protests associated with BLM, which caused significant damage. Kamala Harris even supported bail funds for those involved in the riots, while Elizabeth Warren acknowledged the rigging of the 2016 primary. Despite this, many continue to lecture the public about protecting democracy.

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

Was it an insurrection against democracy when U.S. intelligence agencies promoted the Russiagate hoax? Was it an insurrection against democracy when the Democrats rigged their primary election? Was it an insurrection against democracy when 51 intelligence officials lied about the Blden laptop to get it censored and influence the election? Was it an insurrection against democracy when BLM burned down cities for weeks, including violent attacks on the Secret Service as they attempted to burn down the White House? The Democrat Party celebrated all these insurrections against democracy. Kamala Harris promoted funds to bail out BLM rioters who caused $1 to $2 billion in damage while burning, looting, and rioting in American cities for weeks. Kamala Harris' bail fund even freed George Howard, who shot and killed a man shortly after his release. Elizabeth Warren stated on national TV that Democrats rigged their primary election in 2016. The Democrat Party rigged their primary election again in 2024. Yet, the same people go on TV every day and lecture America about attacks against our democracy.

KariLake
Posted - August 2, 2024 at 9:53 PM
Saved - August 3, 2024 at 2:29 PM

@KariLake - Kari Lake

Threat to democracy? 🤔🤔 https://t.co/gZEZ7toIEy

elonmusk
Posted - August 10, 2024 at 11:46 AM
Saved - August 10, 2024 at 6:35 PM

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

Freedom of speech is the bedrock of democracy. If the truth is suppressed, it is impossible to make an informed voting decision. The degree to which freedom of speech is being undermined around the world is extremely alarming.

CarolineForPA
Posted - May 3, 2025 at 4:09 PM
Saved - May 5, 2025 at 1:29 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared my frustrations about Scott, who misrepresented his contributions while I was actively running spaces and uncovering the truth. Many in Pennsylvania were focused on getting Trump elected, while Scott did nothing to help. I contributed significantly to his app but left after my findings. Despite my efforts to raise awareness, I was blocked from a space for speaking the truth. I believe a woman involved is complicit in silencing dissent. Our elections are being compromised, and we risk losing our nation, one race at a time. More revelations are coming.

@CarolineForPA - Caroline for Congress

Like I said in the post below . While real grassroots like myself and 1000s of others, most of them had no idea that Scott was over in X gaslighting the entire platform that he was doing all the work I knew, as I ran spaces and discovered multipple lets say untruths about Scott's actions . The People in PA that did know were so busy getting @realDonaldTrump Not just elected, but on the primary ballot which scott did flat out nothing to do with. Refusing to add "make calls for Trump"on his new App,which BTW I helped a great deal with, but quit promptly after my discoveries. Most just kept working and kept our mouths shut . Though I did both, I rang the alarm bell ,networking and work for Trump camp. I was literally blocked from an entire space for telling the straight up truth and this woman knew it . They Blocked it because they knew it was true. In my opinion this woman is a co-conspirator , because she not only knew she propped up and silenced the truth . Very much including with presler and she told me she'd been paying him in 1 way or the other since 2015 More will be revealed .Our states Elections are being rigged and compromised and we are losing our nation1 down ballot race at a time .

@CarolineForPA - Caroline for Congress

After the election in the state of Pennsylvania, literally 1000s of ppl worked daily and tirelessly with no camera attached to their every move and on their own dime. I was one of them doing all the grunt work , and also during the primary to secure Trumps position on the ballot We had to overcome party GOP elitist make no mistake Scott is establishment GOP all the way and that's not a compliment in PA, anywho Some of us never sat down for a meal with our families. Some people freinds and family passed away and they still hit the streets for free. Most folks didn't know that Scott was over on X, gaslighting the people into believing he had done all the work. And was taking credit for it, too. I know he did not do a damn thing for the non- establishment candidates in the primaries. Why? He says he doesn't endorse in the primary, but that's not all together true, is it ? I was at the polls, many different ones, and in constant contact with others at polls. No sign of Scott. He was having a nice day at lunch with a " friend" While most of us had to just recover, tired and broke, physically exhausted, Scott showed up like this on X and several million $ richer - My husband took 1 look and said blasphemy -

GuntherEagleman
Posted - February 6, 2026 at 10:42 AM
Saved - February 6, 2026 at 1:25 PM

@GuntherEagleman - Gunther Eagleman™

2020 was stolen. https://t.co/mJchdnvyVa

Video Transcript AI Summary
Initiated by a court order, the Michigan investigation team obtained forensic access to a DS 200 tabulator—the machine that counts the votes. A Telet four g wireless chip manufactured in Taiwan was discovered embedded into the motherboard. The voting machine tapes clearly indicate modem engagement and transmission of election data. Some of the anomalies noted in the 2020 general elections involved five key states that all stopped counting at a certain time in these battleground states. These were all where the software, the mini machines, the SNS machines were used, Smartmatic, GEMS software. So when the vote stopped counting, and this has been noted in other countries as well, President Trump was significantly ahead. When reporting and counting resumed, there was a massive spike that occurred that favored Joe Biden.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Initiated by a court order, the Michigan investigation team obtained forensic access to a DS 200 tabulator, the machine that counts the votes. A Telet four g wireless chip manufactured in Taiwan was discovered embedded into the motherboard. The voting machine tapes clearly indicate modem engagement and transmission of election data. Some of the anomalies that we noticed in the twenty twenty general elections, that five key states all stopped counting at a certain time in these key battleground states. These were all where the software, the mini machines, the SNS machines were used, Smartmatic, GEMS software. So when the vote stopped counting, and this has been noted in other countries as well, president Trump was significantly ahead. When reporting and counting resumed, there was a massive spike occurred that, that favored Joe Biden.
View Full Interactive Feed