reSee.it - Related Post Feed
@iluminatibot - illuminatibot
Video Transcript AI Summary
I discovered something significant: the idea of using hemp to replace plastic and other materials. Hemp is illegal, but it could be a sustainable alternative. However, the reason it's not being utilized is because hemp absorbs a lot of carbon. Growing enough hemp to replace plastic would offset the carbon reduction efforts of Agenda 21. This is why they continue to let the world suffer from plastic pollution instead of using hemp.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So I think I just stumbled upon something huge. You're gonna wanna hear this. And I haven't heard anyone talking about it. So I was thinking last night, what are we gonna do with all this trash? It's toxic.
It's plastic. It's leaching into the groundwater. What are we gonna do about it? And then I thought, well, duh. We just need to stop producing it and use a different material.
And then it hit me. Hemp is illegal anymore. So why aren't they using hemp to make plastics and whatnot? Which they're able to do, and it's not because of big oil. The reason they're not using hemp to replace the entire packaging, plastic, all these materials, this whole industry that it would replace.
It's because hemp is said To absorb a lot of carbon, the amount of hemp they need to grow to to facilitate the needs of that transformation of materials would completely offset the carbon in that they're trying to get us so desperately to stop producing. And agenda 21 is based around stopping this production of carbon. If hemp does it, they won't be able to stuff us into 5 g, facial recognition, smart cities that control every aspect of our life. So that's why they're not throwing hemp, and they're letting the world choke on plastic.
@RickyDoggin - A Man Of Memes
Video Transcript AI Summary
During the judiciary committee hearing, we faced some challenges. We aimed to obtain subpoenas for Jeffrey Epstein's flight logs and Sotomayor's book deal, which were not previously reported. Unfortunately, the chairman blocked our requests, which goes against the committee's intended process.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, if you were not watching C SPAN and if you didn't see that judiciary committee hearing today, this was quite a mess. But we were trying to get my subpoenas of Jeffrey Epstein's flight logs and the subpoena of Sotomayor in her book deal, things that weren't reported, but we have found out about this through the news. And, of course, the chairman blocked it all, cut it off. That's not how this committee is supposed to work.
@Whiplash437 - Whiplash347
Video Transcript AI Summary
Counties are allegedly stealing land through various agreements, exploiting citizens' ignorance. By creating ZIP code overlays, they claim ownership. The solution proposed is establishing private trusts to reclaim land. The speaker emphasizes the importance of recognizing the difference between lawful and legal land descriptions. They urge people to assert their rights, reclaim their land, and appoint sheriffs aligned with the people's interests. The focus is on restoring individual sovereignty and challenging the current system.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So what I think is important to note is that just about every county right now is trying to steal your land, not just trying to make it. And they usually do it through tacit, nonconsensual agreements. So when you signed or you registered, to vote here, when you signed a marriage certificate, when you sign your children into the hospital, when you sign their birth certificate, when you sign your driver's license. All of these things are scams to not only seal everything that you own, your entire estate, your children, and your land. Now the way that they've actually stolen the land is quite fascinating.
They just created an overlay of ZIP codes, then they claimed them. But the thing about it is they can't claim your land. Land can only be passed from one sovereign to the next. It cannot be passed to a foreign corporation. So what they're doing is they're claiming your land because you haven't, and that way when you die, they can take it from your heirs.
So that's why we need to get a little smarter about operating in the private, setting up our own private trust, and claiming our land. It's, like, far and away. All you need is a bunch of little, you know, white flags and some posts so you can get your meads and mounds, and then you can claim your land. And therefore, you can then pass it on to your heirs. So one of the things we're doing immediately for Operation Restoration is we're setting up a PMA, a social compact, wherein we're providing refuge for people that wanna come back and get their land back from the county.
We're talking 4,500,000 people in Maricopa County, of which they have every single person, this right here, this Maricopa County Assessor's Office
Speaker 1: Which, Mickey, no one's here working.
Speaker 0: No one's even here working.
Speaker 1: All these today's March 13th.
Speaker 0: Land, and they're just banging on the fact that you're gonna die
Speaker 1: They're all running around
Speaker 0: in there because they see a citizen.
Speaker 2: If I may, the way how the way how it's done. So you have you have a land. You have a physical land that can be only described in physical means and bounds. And, when you, when you go to purchase a property, let's actually wait for the gentleman to, to hear this. So when
Speaker 3: you go to purchase a property, you have a realtor. Right?
Speaker 2: And they show you the actual land. They show you the the front yard. They show you the backyard. They show you the house, you walk through the house, right? You love the barbecue and say, yeah, I want this house.
Okay, then they show you through this escrow process and at the end they they create deed. Deed of trust, warranty deed, corporate deed or some kind of deed. And in that moment, what they've done, they, they take in the description of the land and they took you into a fiction. Okay? And the way how they do it as as, Mickey was saying, through the assessor.
So when our country was invaded, they created this federal territory overlay on top of the land. So the actual land is described in the meets and bounds, which is which is, done through the surveyors, licensed surveyors map. So you have one map that's describing the actual land in the meets and bounds. It basically tells you from this pipe to this pipe, there is so much, you know, fee. Then you have to go at that degree to the next pipe.
And you that's how you describe the actual The actual description. No. Lawful description. There's a difference. No.
That's a lawful description. The legal description is then when they take it at the end of escrow into the fiction, and that's the assessor's map and they did it so they can assess the property taxes because you cannot tax private
Speaker 3: land, but you can tax an estate.
Speaker 2: And that's how they do it. That they take the surveyor's map, they create another map, through the assessor's office called the assessor's map. And now this land is no longer described in the physical meets and bounds, but it's described through a legal description, through a new man that that was created in order for them to take you into, I call it it a little, little love land. Okay? Into the fiction.
And you think you are buying a property, but no. You are actually buying, an interest on their parcel. And the way how you know is just read your deed. In your deed, it will tell you that you are a tenant. Mhmm.
How can you own a property and be a tenant? And how come, if you paid all your property, if you paid for the house that you own, how come, let's say, you get a disease and something bad happens to you and you can no longer afford to pay the property taxes, then the county can come and steal your house that it's paid for. How is that done? This is how it's done. It's all done for fraud.
And people don't even realize that actually they are not foreclosing on the actual land, but they are foreclosing on a fiction, on APN number, which doesn't exist. It only exists as a creation of the mind. K? So the solution is people need to wake up and they need to make claim to the land that's actually sitting abundant.
Speaker 0: It's abundant. It's
Speaker 1: It's everywhere.
Speaker 0: It's abundant. This is how you win every war. It's the land. They knew that. They knew they had to con us out of our land and keep us poor and keep us poor generation to generation to generation so that they could basically just steal our country.
Right.
Speaker 1: And maybe the word the word direction.
Speaker 0: We are slaves, and we are all
Speaker 2: And what
Speaker 1: the word the word mortgage comes from, the rap the root word mort, which is mortician, engage, which is wish. So a mortgage is a 30 year sentence with interest.
Speaker 0: Deathly.
Speaker 1: The deathly is mortgage.
Speaker 0: And they brought money down your list to KB Trust to pay for it. So there's no proof that
Speaker 2: the bank even funded it in the first place. There's no money. There's no money. Money was taken away through the emergency banking act in the 1933. So if there is no money, you know, they couldn't just take the money.
They create had to create a system. It's basically the credit system, through the trust, you know, to you can only discharge set up or or terminate the debt because you have no way to to pay for anything. So what it what I like to really stress out to people people is if you look at at all the foreclosures where people, people's lives were ruined, where families were ruined, you know, people committed suicide for nothing. Okay? For nothing because they left a land that they settled on.
This is the American dream that you can you can own a land, you can you can, you know, nurture the land, you can live from the land, and then you pass it to your heirs. Okay? This is the American dream that so many brave men put their life to and we just gave it away. So this is really the call to people. You need to claim the land that you settled on.
You are the seller.
Speaker 3: Oh, my mind.
Speaker 2: Woo. And then and then you basically have to notice the county, hey, listen. I am no longer participating in this federal territory overlay. And, you know, I actually would like to invite you, come and locate the APN number. Come and locate your number on my property because I think it's on my property.
Mhmm. And, of course, they won't be able to. Right? So we can return the APN number to them. Right?
And once you return the APN number, it's no longer on your property. And should the APN number come back to your property, well, now it's subjected to $5,000 per day per person, trespass fee.
Speaker 0: Now what you guys don't know about Blanca is that she is a dejure sheriff. That she is de jure sheriff of Southern California. And she's brave.
Speaker 3: It means that, basically, as
Speaker 2: I was explaining to the to the corporate, shares, down the hall here is that, you know, they work for corporation. Exactly. So when people when when people when people, unslate from the corporation and they claim their rights and who they are, they declare the correct status that you are one of the people, which is the which is the authority. Well, then you can appoint and elect your your own sheriffs of the people. Right?
So that's the dejour share of the people, for the people, by the people. And to me, it just happened because I guess when, this pandemic rolled in and moms and dads were being arrested for having to wear muzzles to feed their families, you know, no one's no one was standing up for them. And so I was basically teaching people how to exercise your right, how to actually
Speaker 0: the same? And how do you we, the people happening. We, the people, have to stop putting loyalty and or authority to anyone who hasn't signed an oath of office to us. When you sign an oath of office to us and you're working for us, it is night and day. Yeah.
And and
Speaker 2: I can actually show anyone my my oath of office, you know, that's legitimate, and it's a it's it's an honor to to to have it, and I'm just here to serve. I don't get paid. So this is all volunteering because I just love I love freedom, and I love America, and that's what I can do.
Speaker 1: Is that California? We don't have freedom.
Speaker 3: We don't have that.
Speaker 2: California Republic. That's correct. Yeah. California Republic, which and start self governing. So let's let's look at that.
Speaker 0: You have 2 governments. You have the facto and the dejure. The dejure will never fail because it's set up by the forefathers. Okay? De jure is a republic.
It will never fail for lack of a Chelsea. We just have to seed it. Guys, stop watching the fake holy false fake news, fake government, fake everything, and start watching the real stuff. This is the real news.
Speaker 3: This is what real de deuxers
Speaker 0: do. They work for us. On top of that, I have the land patent for almost all of Maricopa County, as in we pulled the patent and now everyone can follow the process procedure to simply claim your land and pass it down to your heirs. Yeah. So this really is a start of a new we're
@thehealthb0t - healthbot
Video Transcript AI Summary
In 2015, a 153-page confidential agreement between Moderna and the US government is discussed. The agreement reveals collaboration between the NIH, Moderna, and Dr. Barrick on mRNA technology for a coronavirus vaccine. The government co-owns the vaccine candidates developed, raising questions about ulterior motives. This predates any current political affiliations.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We'll see how long this one makes it for. Are you ready? This is a 153 pages of the confidential agreement between Moderna and the US government, and it goes back to 2015. What? Jason, what was happening in 2015?
Frankenstein coronavirus. That's right. The same time doctor Barrick and doctor Xi published their paper on the new Frankenstein coronavirus. In fact, let's skip down to page 104. It shows that the NIH and Moderna were collaborating with doctor Barrick.
Wow. His signature is on page 106 of the material transfer agreement. But let's get back up to the top of this specific agreement. The NIH appears to be transferring the mRNA tech to doctor Barrick. But look what they want to make clear, quote, mRNA coronavirus vaccine candidates developed and jointly owned by the NIAID and Moderna.
Mhmm. I'm sorry. I mean, I've seen ulterior motives before, but usually you see them coming. Did you know that the government co owns the vaccine? Oh, by the way, this is not part of the Trump's thing.
This is this is not part of that. This is 2015. The same government that is now mandating its use owns the vaccine. You better share that one quick. Don't know how long it's gonna last.
@TheRoaringKitty - Roaring Kitty
Video Transcript AI Summary
Furi is a game with intense boss fights that feel like the final battle. The bosses taunt, demand you return to your cell, and make you doubt your quest for freedom. The soundtrack motivates you to keep fighting.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Furi is a game where every boss fight feels like the final boss. They taunt you, they demand you get back in your prison cell, they pound you into a pulp, and even make you doubt the righteousness of your own quest towards freedom. But the soundtrack, man, it keeps egging you on to whoop some
@TheRoaringKitty - Roaring Kitty
Video Transcript AI Summary
I demand to be addressed as Colonel or Sir. Did you order the code red? I want the truth. You can't handle the truth. I provide the freedom you enjoy. Did you order the code red? Yes, I did.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm not through with my examination. Sit down. Colonel. What's that? I'd appreciate if he would dress me as colonel or sir.
I believe I've earned it. What do you wanna discuss now? My favorite color? Colonel Jessup, did you order the code red? You don't have to answer that question.
I'll answer the question. You want answers? I think I'm entitled. You want answers? I want the truth.
You can't handle the truth. Son, we live in a world that has walls, and those walls have to be guarded by men with guns. Who's gonna do it? You? You, Lieutenant Weinberg?
I have a greater responsibility than you can possibly fathom. I have neither the time nor the inclination to explain myself to a man who rises and sleeps under the blanket of the very freedom that I provide and then questions the manner in which I provide it. I would rather you just said thank you and went on your way. Otherwise, I suggest you pick up a weapon and stand opposed. Either way, I don't give a damn what you think you are entitled to.
Did you order the code red? I did the job. Did you order the code red? You're goddamn right I did.
@Xx17965797N - Truthseeker
Video Transcript AI Summary
In school bathrooms, I noticed posters for hotlines like the national suicide hotline and the Trevor Project. Curious, I texted the national suicide hotline about my gender confusion. They ensured I wasn't suicidal and suggested I explore my gender. I visited TrevorSpace.org, which is for ages 13-24, and found discussions about loneliness and friendship. There were chat spaces for various identities, including non-binary and age regression. I believe schools are becoming a pipeline for human trafficking, particularly affecting vulnerable LGBTQ kids. When I spoke about this at the National Educators Association, I was cut off when mentioning the Trevor Project, which seems untouchable.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Noticed in our bathrooms that there were these metallic posters bolted into every student bathroom starting in kindergarten, giving the national suicide hotline, the Trevor Project, which is a LGBT suicide hotline, and a bully hotline. Mhmm. And so I thought and it was on my 5 year old level. And I thought, you know, I'm gonna text this hotline and pretend to be a kid and see what they say. So I texted the national suicide hotline, which is 988, and I said, I'm unsure of my gender.
I'm scared about puberty. What should I do? Now, of course, they made sure that I wasn't gonna commit suicide, so they asked all the proper questions. But then they wanted to know know my age, but I didn't give it. Then they said, well, you're not gonna commit suicide, so we see that you just need to explore your gender.
And then they sent me a Trevor Space text, and they said, this is where you can go to explore your gender in a safe place. So I did exactly what they told me to do. So when I went I went to treverspace.org, it said it was for 13 to 24 year olds. I saw kids talking. I'm assuming they were kids, but some were saying, I'm lonely and need a friend.
I saw a lot of that, and somebody would pop in and say, I'll be your friend. Hugs, hugs. Then I saw chat spaces like the chosen family, so we'll be a new family if your parents don't agree with this. They had non binary pals. They had, the furries club pretend to be an animal.
They had the regressor space, which is age identity, means that you can be a 50 year old man and say that you're a 16 year old girl. They had a gay men's club, but the tagline was let's talk about boys. I turned it into homeland security. I believe strongly that this our schools are being used as a pipeline to human trafficking because of these things, and I think they're actually the kids that are most vulnerable are the kids identifying as LGBTQ. Those are the kids being thrown into human trafficking.
I spoke at the National Educators Association. They let me speak. But when I brought up the Trevor Project, the president, Becky Pringle, cut me off immediately. The Trevor Project is a sacred cow. You cannot touch it.
@BrockRiddickIFB - Brock Riddick
Video Transcript AI Summary
Have you heard what Jean Ho suggested? He thinks Donald Trump should sign a law allowing anyone who faked their death to return without harassment from the media or others. This could benefit those who want to escape the pressures of fame, especially in showbiz, where many feel trapped.
Additionally, I’ve found something significant related to this topic, but I need to keep it in my subscription area for now to gauge how strict the platform will be. If you want to know more about the real situation, consider subscribing. I’ll likely share it eventually, but for now, I’m testing the waters. Remember, this is all for entertainment purposes, and there’s no hidden message here.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Have you heard what Jean Ho said? Gino, who was this guy's personal photographer? Wait to hear this.
Speaker 1: But this is a law that I think Donald Trump should sign into law if he should become president again, and I think it's a pretty good idea. Imagine if Donald Trump signed into a law, something to the effect of that anyone who ever faked their death in the past come come back and not be harassed at all. The media couldn't contact him. People can't contact him unless they want to talk to them. They could just come back and live a peaceful life.
But the thing is and, again, I'm saying I'm not implying anything. But think about how wonderful this could be so that it extends to anyone that wants to retire from a certain profession. For example, look at all the people in showbiz or music or whatever that they just hate their lives because the fame wasn't what they thought it would be, and they just wanna leave, but they can't leave.
Speaker 0: That's a very interesting thought you have there, Jean, especially in light of what I've been posting lately. And not only what I've been posting lately, but what someone else has been posting lately. Now I'm not even gonna lie to you guys. I found my smoking gun. I really did.
The smoking gun that you won't have any doubt. But I gotta put it in my subscription area for the time being because I need to test the waters on how strict and censored they're gonna be about it. So if you wanna know the real deal that isn't him, that's just the decoy, you should go subscribe. And like I said, I'll probably release this eventually, but I just gotta test those waters and see how dangerous they are. But, of course, this is all for entertainment purposes.
I know that he's just having funsies, and there's no secret message there. Entertainment only.
@elonmusk - Elon Musk
Video Transcript AI Summary
We should expect hundreds of billions of dollars in wasteful spending at the Department of Defense. It's unacceptable that a full audit won't be completed for four years. The Pentagon needs to be able to pass a budget now, and while the Marine Corps has passed a clean audit for two years, this needs to be department-wide. We need to know exactly where every dollar is going. This is basic accounting, and it's something the Defense Department has lacked. We're committed to fixing this.
With America's $37 trillion debt, we must use resources wisely. We welcome partnerships, like with Doge, to streamline processes, cut waste, and ensure every dollar goes to our warfighters. The Defense Department has a huge budget, and responsible spending is crucial.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So tell us about this upcoming look at the spending at the defense department. Should we expect hundreds of billions of dollars in wasteful spending there?
Speaker 1: Unfortunately, I think so. And we very much the president is right. He's setting the pace, and he is also correct that American taxpayers deserve to know exactly how and where their money is spent. The fact that I have to commit, Maria, to an audit being done in four years is bad enough. The Pentagon should be able to pass a budget right now.
Now. Thankfully, the Marine Corps has passed a clean audit for two years in a row, and I applaud them. But that needs to go across the entire department. So that will be a focus. Where we spend dollars, we need to know or when we spend dollars, we need to know where they're going and why.
That's simple accounting, and that has not existed at the defense department. We're gonna fix that. But that's not even Doge. I mean, we welcome Elon Musk and Doge coming into our department to help us identify additional ways in which we can streamline processes, fast track acquisitions, cut waste, cut tail to put it to tooth. We we know, in in a world where America's, you know, $37,000,000,000,000 in debt, resources will not be unlimited.
So every dollar we can find that isn't being spent wisely is one we can put toward war fighters. So we welcome DOGE at DOD. We will partner with them, and it's long overdue. The Defense Department's got a huge budget, but it needs to be responsible.
@elonmusk - Elon Musk
Video Transcript AI Summary
I don't trust OpenAI. I founded it as an open-source non-profit; the "open" in OpenAI was my doing. Now it's closed source and focused on profit maximization. I don't understand that shift. Sam Altman, despite claims otherwise, has become wealthy, and stands to gain billions more. I don't trust him, and I'm concerned about the most powerful AI being controlled by someone untrustworthy.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I don't trust OpenAI. I mean, I you know, I started that company as a nonprofit open source. Yes. The open in OpenAI I named the company. I named the company Yeah.
OpenAI as an open source. And it is now extremely closed source and and maximizing profit. So Does risk I don't understand how you actually go from being a an open source nonprofit to a closed source for maximum profit organization. I'm missing Well, but Sam Aukland got rich, though, didn't he? At various points, he's claimed not to be getting rich, but he's claimed many things that were false.
And now apparently, he's gonna get $10,000,000,000 of stock or something like that. So, I don't trust Sam Altman, and I and I don't think we wanna have the most powerful AI in the world controlled by someone who is not trustworthy.
@Jim_Jordan - Rep. Jim Jordan
Video Transcript AI Summary
It's an exciting time with President Trump focused on fulfilling his promises. We need a Justice Department that applies the law equally, unlike the political approach under Biden and Garland. The focus should be on traditional crime, not spying on Americans. We're seeing changes with Pam Bondi and others, targeting sanctuary cities that defy federal law.
We've curbed big tech censorship, but foreign countries are now pressuring tech companies to censor Americans. We're considering visa restrictions for those involved. Investigations are needed into the sweetheart deal for Hunter Biden, the January 6th pipe bombs, and more. The goal is transparency and accountability, answering the questions the American people deserve to have answered.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Mister chairman, just exciting moment. We're brimming. We're brimming with excitement. It's it's it's, really it it it's really, an unbelievable timeline that we're living in.
Speaker 1: You've
Speaker 0: been on the show for years, mister chairman. It's, like, saying that this might be what happens if we get Trump elected. You've you've gotta be whistling Dixie this morning.
Speaker 1: Well, yeah. It is it is an exciting time, and you we've never seen a president with this kind of focus intensity, just this kind of effort to just do what he told the voters he was gonna do, whether it's Elon Musk working for the president on this Doge effort and and identifying all the ridiculous spending or or the things you're talking about. But but this is a great great idea. How about these the the leaders of these cities? Instead of being sanctuary cities, you actually have a mayor who's going to stop the crazy crime that takes place in all our major urban areas.
He's gonna focus on on on on helping the citizens with their better education system and everything else. How about people like that? I think that's what president Trump wants versus, oh, we're gonna be a sanctuary city. We're gonna not comply with federal law enforcement who are executing the law. We're gonna make an we're gonna be a, you know, try to stop them and prevent them from doing their job.
I think I think that's the kind of focus that people want. And frankly, people in those cities want and president Trump is trying to trying to help make that come about.
Speaker 0: Yes. So okay. Something that we haven't gotten to on the show just yet is the news that president Trump has fired now all Joe Biden federal prosecutors. These are some of the people who've been a major thorn in your paw leading the judiciary committee. Your take on this, I'd see it's gotta be welcome, but we well, I don't think we've ever seen action like this, before, certainly not in Trump's first term.
Speaker 1: Well, this is this is real basic. We want a justice department that actually gets back to the fundamental principle, equal treatment under the law. We don't want a justice department like we had under the Biden Garland, administration where they're political. And we know Jack Smith was totally political. We know what was going on with some of the political prosecutions of folks on on January who who were here on January 6, who may have inadvertently stepped across some line and then they get prosecute.
So we we know that kind of attitude out there. And what I think president Trump and the people of the justice department are doing is saying, no. We're gonna focus on equal treatment under the law, applying the law the way it's supposed to be applied, not politics, and that is welcome. And, frankly, that's what the American people voted for because they saw how political that place had become, and and the lawfare activity against the guy who was our nominee for president, who got 77,000,000 votes and is now president of The United States against president Trump. And so, I think it's welcomed by the, by the people and a good thing for following our constitution.
Speaker 0: Yeah. I mean, Bambandi, very much like a wrecking ball. Did you hear the reports that she tore down a portrait of Joe Biden and Kamala Harris?
Speaker 1: I did.
Speaker 0: And what was it? Merrick Garland. Right? Yeah. That she personally did.
That there's now multiple credible reports that she did it herself and stacked them in the trash.
Speaker 1: The, the, the other thing you said, the the first day on the job, she issues the memorandum. On the second page of that memorandum, she's talking about this committee to look at the weaponization of government and particularly the justice department. And she goes bullet point by bullet point, and it's all things we had been focused on and investigating over the last congress. And it was so refreshing. In fact, I told Pam that.
I said, this is so good that memorandum you put out and the intensity and focus you are bringing to equal treatment under the law, again, is exactly what the American people wanted.
Speaker 0: So the criticism of this is gonna be, oh, you can't take away all the prosecutors. What will happen? Who will prosecute the crime? They've been doing the same thing with the FBI, right, with the, sort of the elimination of those individuals who, as you mentioned, January 6, were going after innocent Americans. You like, what's the counterbalance to that?
Right? Because that's that's the
Speaker 1: that's the that's the problem
Speaker 0: right now.
Speaker 1: Yeah. They have they take the FBI for an example, Vinny. The about $12,000,000,000 budget at the FBI. More than half of that money is spent on counterintelligence, intelligence, surveillance. I mean, basically, you know, looking and surveilling the American people.
More than half of the budget, half the personnel. I think the American people would kinda like an FBI that's probably focused more on traditional crime that, you know, organized crime, gang activity, money laundering, all the stuff that we typically think the FBI's child exploitation, everything else, focus on stopping that stuff versus spying on the American people. So, that's, I think, the kind of focus you're gonna see from Kash Patel when he gets confirmed and heads the FBI. That's what we want, and that's what I think American people want. So that that's that's what that's the change that I think needs to take place and is going to take place under Pam Bondi, Todd Blanche who will be deputy attorney general, and, of course, Kash Patel at the FBI.
Speaker 0: We oh, I think that the the the changes the changes, shook quite a few people. We weren't expecting that Leticia James gets, sued by the justice department on, like, day three. We weren't expecting that. And, it's, like, refreshing actually because sanctuary states are illegal. I mean, they should be illegal.
Right? Like, you you don't have a right to just defy federal law. You can just do that. You just Yep. Choose.
You're not gonna, there's no first amendment here. Right? And it's like, we're Oregon. Like, that's not how it works, actually.
Speaker 1: Yeah. And and this and the situation that I think both Tom Homan and Pam Bondi have talked about where it looks like sometimes their people are tipping off, the the bad gas, the the people with a criminal background who Tom Homan is coming in to rightfully repatriate out of the country repatriate back to their their their their home country, and they're getting tipped off in it. And I think Tom Homan said, it looks like it may have been an FBI agent who did that. Well, you can't do that. That's that that's like helping the bad guys when and and and endangering law enforcement, members potentially.
So, yeah, that when you when you're doing those kind of things, I think criminal prosecution should be something that's definitely, definitely in in play.
Speaker 0: And we wanna be treason, like, you're acting against federal law enforcement and you're helping out the criminals. You're not
Speaker 1: supposed to you're not supposed to help the bad guys. And if you do, you're probably in trouble, and we should probably prosecute peoples who do those things.
Speaker 0: Alright. Let's talk about your let's talk about your potential prosecutions. Let's talk about your potential investigations. What do we have coming up on the judiciary committee? A target rich environment, I think we'd call it.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Well, one thing on the censorship front, we think we've met we've had a huge impact there in stopping, big government and big tech and other federal government agencies and universities all working together, what Michael Shellenberger called the censorship industrial complex. We think we've really scaled that back into protecting the first amendment. But right now what's happening is in foreign countries, they're using their laws to pressure tech companies to censor Americans. And so we're gonna see if there's a way we can put some pressure on these foreign countries to, one example would be if you're you're involved in in in any way, censoring Americans, you shouldn't be able to get a visa and come to the country.
If you're someone of these foreign dignitaries who likes to come to The United States, everyone likes to come here. So that's a that's a piece of legislation one of our members has that we'll look at passing. And then on the oversight thing, we still think there's a look back that needs to happen with David Weiss, who was gonna give the sweetheart deal to Hunter Biden. We still think we don't have answers on, you know, who planted the pipe bombs on January 6, who leaked the Dobbs opinion, who put cocaine at the White House for goodness sake. I think the American people like to know those things, and they'd also like to know about what the Garland justice department was doing when they said, if you're a pro life Catholic, you're an extremist, or if you're a mom and dad at a school board meeting, we're gonna investigate you.
So we're gonna look back at all that stuff and get answers for the American people.
Speaker 0: I'd love to get an answer on something that cross our timeline. Some of your colleagues, Tom Tillis in the senate was actually, in front of an ad. I couldn't believe it when I saw it. He was in front of an ad that had an x over Elon Musk, and he said we must eliminate Elon Musk. We'll pull up the ad here and we'll pop it up on screen because it was I thought there's no way.
Here it is.
Speaker 1: There's no way.
Speaker 0: It's like it's gotta be a meme. Right? But no. It's real. And here's, your colleague, Republican in the senate saying, this is allegedly we're looking into who's funding this, but, like, help eliminate Elon Musk with a crossover his face and a USAID logo on the bottom.
And this is being of course, you can't just advertise somebody has to approve these advertisements.
Speaker 1: Right.
Speaker 0: Who's approving these advertisements exactly? It looks like an open threat against a member of the administration. This is insane.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Again, Democrats, Democrats will will attack the guy who's exposing the stupid spending instead of trying to stop the stupid spending. It makes no sense to me. And they're they're over the last, what, two weeks, it's been one one theme, one message from the Democrats, go after Elon Musk. Even though the president told us as as we've said before, told us that when he when he was running for the job, I'm gonna have Elon Musk head up this this Doge, group who's gonna go through agency by agency in the federal government, identify stupid things we're spending taxpayer money on.
And when he identifies those things, the Democrats says, oh, we gotta get rid of Elon Musk. What? That makes no sense. It's I I think, again, we're the party of common sense as the president, always says. I think the American people see this as good common sense governance and are not gonna be supportive of the left who continues to attack, Elon Musk.
I think he's doing the Lord's work. I know he did when he bought remember when he said when he bought Twitter? He said, like, I didn't spend $44,000,000,000 to buy Twitter. I spent $44,000,000,000 to save the first amendment and free speech for goodness sake, and he's been an integral part of the effort to protect the First Amendment. And now he's gonna try to protect us from having these bureaucrats who think they're smarter than you and I and all your viewers and listeners think they're smarter than the rest of us, protect us from the stupid things they wanna spend our money on.
Speaker 0: So it'd be nice it'd be nice to close down the government caves. Didn't know that, didn't know the feds on tricycles in limestone caves was how, retirements were processed. Did did you know that, congressman?
Speaker 1: I did not. I did not know that.
Speaker 0: Is that exciting exciting thing you learned this week?
Speaker 1: I did yeah. I didn't know we were spending money for what some trans comic can perform opera or whatever in Ireland. I didn't know we were spending money to put Bert and Ernie and Big Bert on Baghdad TV. And you're like, what the heck? Heck?
Speaker 0: It's true. What the heck? It's crazy. It's true.
Speaker 1: But oh, no. No. No. It's not that. That's not the problem.
The problem is Elon Musk. That that that that makes no sense. No sense to to the folks I get the privilege of representing in the Fourth District Of Ohio. They're on the Elon Musk's side.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Okay. I mean, it's it just but just as since we named Robert, if you if you would please allow us, here's a photo of the special special tricycles. These are tricycles that the feds drive around. They ride around on them all day.
We pay them salaries and then, massive retirement pensions to ride around on tricycles all day inside of the caverns of an old limestone man to handle retirement paperwork by hand and store them in boxes.
Speaker 1: This
Speaker 0: is what we pay for in the era of AI.
Speaker 1: Go figure. Go figure. Yeah.
Speaker 0: In conclusion, we did hear, from somebody I know that you're very close with, James Comer and Anaplena Luna, this past week. They both been on the program, and then we covered live their announcement of sort of a massive declassification operation. I'm sure you're in favor of that. You've often been on the show talking about it. Can you give us kind of an update?
Is this even something that is feasible? We've you've held up the black line paper before. You've been, like, you've come on the program and held out, like, these just black ink blots. And, like, what what's to give us any hope that that we'll be able to punch past that?
Speaker 1: Yeah. I think I think the main hope is is in the White House. President Trump has indicated he wants the American people to have transparency and understand what what happened with some of these situation with with with the the tragic assassination of of, JFK, and and other issues. So, yeah, let's let's get the facts out there. Our government has information.
We're gonna work with with, in the in the justice department. We're gonna work with, Pam and, Pam Bondi, the attorney general, and and and Todd Blanch, the deputy attorney general, and Cash, to get information on on things, as I said before, that we want that we think the American people still have questions about. So we wanna get those answers. And, the same with, with chairman Comer and representative, Ana Paulina Luna, they wanna get answers to the American people. So the more folks the more you can focus in on it.
I mean, we're seeing this with Elon Musk. There have been organizations who've highlighted the stupid spending in the past. Citizens against government waste has done good work over, you know, the last forty years highlighting the pork book and all the stupid spending. But when you have an intense focus and it was an element of the campaign and a presidential race, that's when you can really highlight it and you get the media attention and the focus of the American people. That's when you can make a difference.
So any effort that adds to the the attention and and focus on an issue helps us get the answers, and that's what chairman Comer and representative Anna Paulino Luna are up to.
Speaker 0: Don't understand it. I I'd say it probably wants to show. Why does our federal government spend so much time and resources protecting pederists? I don't get it, mister I don't. I said this is Jeffrey Epstein.
He's already been he was found guilty of these things, yet we spend all of these resources protecting the client list and everybody who was involved. That doesn't make any sense to me. I'm just I'm just a dumb Midwesterner, you know. I guess I don't.
Speaker 1: You got common sense. Common sense. That's what you are from the nook ass.
Speaker 0: Too many questions. Yeah. That's right. Everybody needs, obviously, if you're not already following Jim Jordan, you're crazy. Okay?
You're living in one of the limestone caves where the government does its retirement. And you're also by following Jim Jordan, who has more followers than us on x, very humbling, 6,000,000 followers on x, you're missing out on the man who actually saved Facebook from itself, and it's something that we haven't gotten a chance to thank you for live. Thank you. Mark Zuckerberg specifically citing your, investigation into Facebook and censorship, saying this is why we've decided to destroy all of our censorship policies because of Jim Jordan. And so thank you, mister chairman.
Speaker 1: Thank you. Thanks for all the good work you do.
Speaker 0: Alright. Godspeed.
@BrockRiddickIFB - Brock Riddick
Video Transcript AI Summary
Someone was clearly on their way to kill me, so I've required protective services essentially all the time. It is very troublesome to me, especially because they've involved my wife and my three daughters. How do I feel? Terrible.
Do I continue to receive threats today? Yes, I do. Every time someone gets up and says I'm responsible for the death of people throughout the world, the death threats go up.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Someone who clearly was on their way to kill me. And it's required my having protective services essentially all the time. It is very troublesome to me. It is much more troublesome because they've involved my wife and my three daughters. At this moment, how do you feel?
Keep your mic on. Terrible. Do you continue to receive threats today? Yes. I do.
Every time someone gets up and says I'm responsible for the death of people throughout the world, the death threats go up.
@elonmusk - Elon Musk
Video Transcript AI Summary
Scott Saad discusses Sam Harris's disappointment that Joe Rogan allows people who spread disinformation on his platform, mentioning Dave Smith, Tucker Carlson, and Donald Trump. Saad disagrees with Harris's consequentialist view on free speech, stating that in a free society, people should be allowed to speak, even if one disagrees with them. Saad says he internalizes the deontological principle that in a free society, you speak to people. He contrasts this with Harris's apparent belief that certain individuals are too dangerous to be given a platform. Saad argues against shutting down voices, even those with whom he strongly disagrees, unless they directly incite violence. He criticizes Harris for seemingly wanting to decide who is allowed to speak. Saad concludes by expressing disappointment in Harris's descent into immoral consequentialism, advocating instead for open debate where better ideas can prevail.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hi everybody, this is Scott Saad. I just saw a clip on X where Sam Harris is sharing his profound disappointment that Joe Rogan would allow all sorts of people on his, platform that quote, you know, spread disinformation and misinformation. He mentions a guy by the name of Dave Smith. I'm not exactly sure who he is. I know he's some kind of anti Israel guy.
And then he mentions the fact that he speaks to guys like Tucker Carlson and Donald Trump and so on, and these guys are way too dangerous to be given this platform. Again, this demonstrates the consequentialist, bent that Sam has when it comes, to freedom of speech, freedom of inquiry, open debate in a free society. I may not like what Dave Smith says about Israel, and I may think that it's completely wrong. The few snippets I've seen, I don't think very highly of his analyses, But I certainly have never had the reflex to go in public and say, Hey Joe, why are you letting these guys on your show? Because I completely internalize the deontological principle that in a free society, you speak to people.
Now, you may choose not to want to speak to them because you don't want to give them, you know, your time. I don't necessarily debate, creationists, not because I'm trying to shut their voice, but because I don't think it'll be a worthwhile exchange to discuss evolution with a creationist. There's nothing that I can share with them that would alter their position, and therefore an engagement would be futile. But I never have the reflex to say, Hey, Elon, why are you allowing these people on X? These people are sending me all kinds of mean anti Jewish insults.
Please cancel their accounts and so on. Precisely because I understand that in a free society, short of direct incitement to violence and so on, all bets are off. You either believe in free speech absolutism or you don't. So the the reflex that Sam has, which is, you know, there are too many important issues to allow all the rubes, the plebs, the great unwashed to, you know, be exposed to all this. It is for us, the anointed ones, and I as your leader, the Malibu Meditator, to decide who's allowed to speak, who's not allowed to speak, who should be given a platform, who shouldn't be given a platform.
I mean, having the goal to go to Joe Rogan, who, you know, I obviously know very well. He's a good friend. I've been on his show 11 times. And Sam has been on his show. Imagine now turning on him and saying, Boy, how come Joe allows some people to go on his show with whom I disagree?
That's not how it works. So, the descent of Sam into immoral consequentialism and a violation of every deontological principle continues unabated. And again, it's a very powerful lesson, which is don't commit that fallacy. There is an endless number of things that Sam has said, for example, as relating to COVID that are profoundly wrong. Imagine if we had said, Hey, don't allow Sam to go on any shows anymore.
He is a purveyor of disinformation and misinformation. No. Let him go on shows, let him espouse his position, and then if there are better ideas, then if nothing else, the punishment will be that his words would come back to haunt him. So, more disappointment from the great Malibu Meditator. Cheers, everybody.
@simpatico771 - SIMPLICIUS Ѱ
Video Transcript AI Summary
У вас водка литровая? А вот магазин Михаэлс — там продается литровая водка? По талонам вам не жалко было водку на колпро на играть большая удача
Do you have liter vodka? Here's Michaels store — there is liter vodka sold there? By coupons you wouldn't mind vodka for kolpro to play, big luck
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: У вас водка литровая? А вот магазин Михаэлс. И там продается литровая водка? По талонам вам не жалко было водку на колпро на играть большая удача
@KarluskaP - Karli Bonne’ 🇺🇸
Video Transcript AI Summary
Endocannabinoid system is essential, acting like a conductor that keeps all body systems in harmony. As we age, the system weakens, contributing to pain, inflammation, cognitive decline, and other aging ailments doctors treat with dangerous and addictive pharmaceuticals. Lifestyle changes can help, but 'the system can be restored faster using hemp derived CBD.' When restored, 'pain subsides, sleep is improved, and stress is reduced.' And 'disease progression can slow down and years are added to your life as well as years spent in good health.' 'Twenty percent of seniors are already using CBD today for pain, arthritis, cancer symptoms, sleep disorders, Alzheimer's, and many other ailments of aging.' Doctors are not equipped to provide guidance, and 'there are no FDA standards for what is already in the market today.' PwC estimates 'annual cost savings for The US, nearly $64,000,000,000 a year' if cannabis is fully integrated. The '2018 farm bill' championed by president Trump was the first step. Now educate doctors on the endocannabinoid system, provide Medicare coverage for CBD, and give millions of seniors the support they deserve. 'You will deliver the most important senior health initiative of the century, cementing your legacy and transforming aging care.'
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Can revolutionize senior health care. We've all heard about the major systems in our bodies, like the digestive, respiratory, nervous, and cardiovascular systems. But there's one essential system discovered in the nineties that you probably never heard of. It makes all of the other systems work smoothly with each other, like a conductor ensuring the different sections of an orchestra all play a beautiful symphony together. This system is called the endocannabinoid system.
It has been acknowledged and studied by scientists extensively with support from the National Institutes of Health. As we age, the system weakens. As a result, the different systems in our body stop working together smoothly. That's one of the reasons older adults struggle with pain, inflammation, cognitive decline, and other ailments of aging for which doctors often prescribe dangerous and addictive pharmaceuticals. They also recommend lifestyle remedies such as exercise, good diet, and stress management.
And while all these improve the system, it is only fractionally and over a long time. But here's the game changer. The system can be restored faster using hemp derived CBD. When the system is restored, pain subsides, sleep is improved, and stress is reduced. When the system is restored, disease progression can slow down and years are added to your life as well as years spent in good health.
And twenty percent of seniors are already using CBD today for pain, arthritis, cancer symptoms, sleep disorders, Alzheimer's, and many other ailments of aging. But doctors are not equipped to provide guidance. And there are no FDA standards for what is already in the market today. Imagine if that were the case for other medications. Older adults are suffering needlessly.
Hemp derived CBD can help them feel better, live longer, and improve their quality of life significantly.
Speaker 1: A PricewaterhouseCoopers report estimates annual cost savings for The US, nearly $64,000,000,000 a year if cannabis is fully integrated into the health care system.
Speaker 0: The groundbreaking 2018 farm bill championed by president Trump was the first step. Now it's time to educate doctors on the endocannabinoid system, provide Medicare coverage for CBD, and give millions of seniors the support they deserve. You will deliver the most important senior health initiative of the century, cementing your legacy and transforming aging care. Millions everywhere. We'll thank you.