reSee.it - Related Post Feed

LUMINEUSE777
Posted - January 29, 2023 at 4:34 PM
Saved - September 26, 2023 at 11:40 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The use of chitin, extracted from insects, to produce graphene, a toxic element found in COVID injections, raises concerns. The non-mandatory labeling of insect flour in food allows its incorporation without our knowledge, maximizing profits. Insect consumption poses health risks due to antinutritional substances. The potential transmission of parasitic diseases by edible insects is alarming. The addition of insect powder, like lactoserum, to various products is widespread. The questionable effects of consuming insects on inflammation and immunity require further investigation. The presence of graphene in COVID injections is scientifically proven. The use of insect powder in food products and its potential consequences should be carefully examined.

@LUMINEUSE777 - LUMINEUSE777

🛑💥🛑 1/ ? : NOUVEAU THREAD ÉVOLUTIF CHITINE, élément toxiq pour les humains contenue dans les insectes, est utilisée POUR produire 💥GRAPHÈNE qui est l'élément toxique contenu ds les injections COVID ! Lien vidéo NON dangereux, c'est 1 censure déguisée! https://www.bitchute.com/video/vGXSVuCQFYMV/

#CHITINE : Un Adjuvant à l’Oxyde De Graphène ### NOUVELLE VIDÉO ### Ricardo DELGADO (La Quinta Columna) nous alerte sur la raison de l’introduction des insectes dans la chaîne alimentaire humaine. Traduction et ST : La Quinta Columna - Voix Off : John Doe Lien vidéo source : https://… bitchute.com

@LUMINEUSE777 - LUMINEUSE777

2/? 💥De la chitine on extrait le chitosan, qui par 1 procédé d'exfoliation par ultrasons, DONNE DU GRAPHÈNE ! (GRAPHÈNE est l'élément TOXIQUE des injections COVID) De nombreuses carapaces d'insectes, crustacés sont CE QU'ON APPELLE des "bio-polymères" ! https://crowdbunker.com/v/qQicELi7os

@LUMINEUSE777 - LUMINEUSE777

3/? 💥En permettant NON-ETIQUETAGE OBLIGATOIRE de présence farine d'insectes ds alimentat°, ces farines peuvent être incorporées ds TOUT à notre insu ce qui PERMET: -profits MAXI sur vente farines insectes -sert en même temps à produire graphène -le tt combiné empoisonne populat°

@LUMINEUSE777 - LUMINEUSE777

4/? "Selon vétérinaires du León : manger insectes comporte risques pour santé. Il est nécessaire d'enquêter, car ils contiennent des substances anti-nutritionnelles qui activent processus inflammatoires tels que chitine et agents chélatants tels que les... https://www.larazon.es/salud/20230122/ph3osg5r5zg2hfuxn3vwhgacim.html

Menos solomillo y más gusanos Vendrán más insectos, junto a la recomendación de no ingerir carne, porque contamina, y sustituirla por carne artificial, que es muy buena larazon.es

@LUMINEUSE777 - LUMINEUSE777

5/? ...oxalates, qui réduisent absorption minéraux et vitamines, tels que les saponines et la thiaminase. Insectes cryptotoxiques (certains coléoptères) génèrent hormones stéroïdes et peuvent provoquer retard croissance, infertilité, masculinisat°, œdème, jaunisse et cancer foie"

@LUMINEUSE777 - LUMINEUSE777

6/? Autre vidéo sur dangers de la consommation d'insectes https://odysee.com/@ExcaliburTraduction:4/Insect-Food-Is-Toxic-Wl-1:f

Manger des insectes ? Voici une liste de problèmes sanitaires que cela va engendrer (liste non exhaustive et absolument pas rassurante). Entreprise française à fond dans le business de la nourriture à base d'insectes. odysee.com

@LUMINEUSE777 - LUMINEUSE777

7/? ÉTUDE SCIENTIFIQUE METTANT EN ÉVIDENCE LE QUESTIONNEMENT LÉGITIME À SE POSER SUR LES EFFETS INFLAMMATOIRES ET ANTI-IMMUNITAIRES DE LA CONSOMMATION D'INSECTES https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5680136/

Chitin and Its Effects on Inflammatory and Immune Responses Chitin, a potential allergy-promoting pathogen-associated molecular pattern (PAMP), is a linear polymer composed of N-acetylglucosamine residues which are linked by β-(1,4)-glycosidic bonds. Mammalians are potential hosts for chitin-containing ... ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

@LUMINEUSE777 - LUMINEUSE777

🚨💥🚨 8/ ? POUR MÉMOIRE : VIDÉO SYNTHESE DE L'ÉQUIPE SCIENTIFIQUE PLURI-DISCIPLINAIRE DE LA QUINTA COLUMNA... AYANT MIS EN ÉVIDENCE ET ALERTÉ SUR LA PRÉSENCE DE GRAPHÈNE DANS LES INJECTIONS COVID. https://odysee.com/@St%C3%A9phane:2/VACCINS--Le-vrai-but-de-ces-injections-est-scientifiquement-d%C3%A9montr%C3%A9-ici-...-Hallucinant-!!!:f

VACCINS Le vrai but de ces injections est scientifiquement démontré ici ... Hallucinant !!! La Quinta Columna est une organisation internationale qui est composée de scientifiques de toutes disciplines et du plus haut niveau... odysee.com

@LUMINEUSE777 - LUMINEUSE777

9/? ⚠️"Chitine et chitosane : prod et appli de nanomatériaux biomédicaux polyvalents" "applis nanotechnologiques de la chitine et du chitosane allant de ingénierie tissulaire, pansements, agents antimicrobiens, cosmétiques anti-âge et adjuvants de vaccins" https://www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.translate.goog/pmc/articles/PMC5094803/?_x_tr_sl=en&_x_tr_tl=fr&_x_tr_hl=en&_x_tr_pto=wapp

Chitin and Chitosan: Production and Application of Versatile Biomedical Nanomaterials Chitin is the most abundant aminopolysaccharide polymer occurring in nature, and is the building material that gives strength to the exoskeletons of crustaceans, insects, and the cell walls of fungi. Through enzymatic or chemical deacetylation, chitin ... www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.translate.goog

@LUMINEUSE777 - LUMINEUSE777

10/? ⚠️ETUDE ; "Évaluat° parasitologiq des insectes comestibles et leur rôle ds la transmission des maladies parasitaires à l'homme et aux animaux" 📢HUMAINS ET ANIMAUX ! Or alimentat° animale est aussi concernée ! Voir tweets suivants sur lactosérum ! https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31283777/

A parasitological evaluation of edible insects and their role in the transmission of parasitic diseases to humans and animals - PubMed From 1 January 2018 came into force Regulation (EU) 2015/2238 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2015, introducing the concept of "novel foods", including insects and their parts. One of the most commonly used species of insects are: mealworms (Tenebrio molitor), house cric … pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

@LUMINEUSE777 - LUMINEUSE777

11/? 💥⬇️Liste des ALIMENTS CONCERNÉS ⬇️💥 AYANT ÉTÉ AUTORISÉS À UTILISER DE LA "POUDRE ou FARINE D'INSECTES" 💥Parmi ces aliments, est cité le LACTOSERUM ! Voir absolument tweets suivants

@LUMINEUSE777 - LUMINEUSE777

12/? 💥 LACTOSERUM : pour comprendre ce que c'est, à quoi çà sert... et donc l'étendue potentielle de tous les aliments concernés si ils remplacent (ou ajoutent à) ce "lactoserum en poudre d'origine lactique" par de la "poudre d'insectes" !!! https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lactos%C3%A9rum

Lactosérum — Wikipédia fr.wikipedia.org

@LUMINEUSE777 - LUMINEUSE777

14/? 💥 LACTOSERUM : pour comprendre ce que c'est, à quoi çà sert... et donc l'étendue potentielle de tous les aliments concernés si ils remplacent (ou ajoutent à) ce "lactoserum en poudre d'origine lactique" par de la "poudre d'insectes" !!! https://www.tetrapak.com/fr-fr/insights/food-categories/whey-powder

Poudre de lactosérum Le lactosérum est le sous-produit de la fabrication du fromage à pâte dure, semi-dure et molle. Il s'agit d'une matière première utilisée pour produire la poudre de lactosérum et la protéine de lactosérum tetrapak.com

@LUMINEUSE777 - LUMINEUSE777

15/? ⚠️Après avoir lu les 3 tweets précédents... vous comprenez l'étendue des aliments concernés... la POUDRE DE LACTOSERUM étant donc utilisée ds ÉNORMÉMENT DE CHOSES dont : - laits infantiles, - produits laitiers, fromages .... et - alimentation animale

@LUMINEUSE777 - LUMINEUSE777

16/ ? 💥une des images du tweet suivant :

@Lion_Soldier3 - 🇫🇷🙏🇮🇹 🙏🇺🇲🙏🇷🇺🦁 Lion_Soldier

Ne tombez pas dans le panneau de bouffer des insectes 🙏🦁😉

@LUMINEUSE777 - LUMINEUSE777

17/ 💥selon tweet suivant : - Information ? "sous réserve" " à titre indicatif" que pour l'instant je n'ai pas pu confirmer par ailleurs - étiquetage serait NON obligatoire ? MAIS⚠️ - allergiq aux crustacés ont toutes raison d'être allergiq aux insect

@Lion_Soldier3 - 🇫🇷🙏🇮🇹 🙏🇺🇲🙏🇷🇺🦁 Lion_Soldier

Ne tombez pas dans le panneau de bouffer des insectes 🙏🦁😉

@LUMINEUSE777 - LUMINEUSE777

18/ ? 🚨⚠️🚨ALERTE MAJEURE du Dr Dorothea THUL : "Ce qu'ils ont fait avec ces injections.... ils tentent de le faire avec la "poudre d'insectes" ! "Cette poudre d'insectes n'est pas ce que vous croyez !" Voir sa lettre au BUNDESTAG (parlement allemand) dans les 2 tweets suivants

Video Transcript AI Summary
I wrote a letter to the German Bundestag about a new EU regulation allowing insects to be added to food. It's dangerous because it contains artificial DNA that can enter the human genome. This is similar to what they've been doing with injections for the past two years. It causes severe damage to the x-chromosome and can destroy the genetic code. We're dealing with a cruel and insane satanic gang trying to alter the human genome. Please read and share the letter to stop this immediately. The risks and side effects of insects in food need to be understood.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Ich würd euch bitten, einen Brief weiterzuleiten. Ich habe heute einen Brief geschrieben an den Deutschen Bundestag an alle Bundestagsabgeordneten. Es geht diese neue EU Verordnung, dass Insekten in jeglicher Form der Nahrungsmitteln hinzugefügt werden dürfen. Ihr habt keine Vorstellung davon, wie gefährlich das ist. Ihr habt auch keine Ahnung, dass das nicht einfach nur 'n bisschen Insektenpulver ist, was da reingemischt wird, sondern dass in diesem ganzen Zeug auch noch künstliche DNA sind Grenzen reingebastelt worden sind, die in das menschliche Genom wandern. Also mit anderen Worten, was die seit zwei Jahren in den Spritzen gemacht haben, das machen Sie jetzt über diese Insekten, die dienen als Trägersubstanz oder als Überträger. Kein Mensch weiß, welche Konsequenzen das haben wird. Man hat nur bis jetzt schon festgestellt, es schwere Schäden verursacht an dem sogenannten x-Chromosom. Und dass dadurch die GeschwätzChron zerstört werden können. Und ich denke, wir müssen nicht mehr darüber reden, dass wir es mit einer ganz furchtbaren grausamen Satanisten Bande tun haben hier, die völlig geisteskrank versucht hat, hier das menschliche Genum zu verändern. Und das machen Sie auch immer noch. Also bitte, ich hab den Brief geschrieben, ihr könnt ihn gern durchlesen, ihr könnt ihn auch gern kopieren und auch teilen, auch selber an den Bundestag schreiben. Ich hab nur aus ärztlicher Sicht die Gründe beschrieben, warum das hier sofort sofort gestoppt werden muss, weil es extrem gefährlich ist. Und bitte bitte man kann diese künstlichen DMA sequenz im Internet bestellen das wird alles über diese Abstriche vertuscht die ihr ja alle freiwillig machen sollt ist ja die Katastrophe. Ihr habt ja keine Ahnung, erklärt euch ja keiner auf, was das alles bedeutet. Deswegen mach ich es halt und deswegen bin ich euch, teilt es das Video vielleicht hier dieses zusammen mit dem Schreiben an den Bundestag. Je mehr Leute an den Bundestag schreiben, desto besser. Ihr könnt gern den Text von mir kopieren. Eure Dorothee Tool und beschäftigt euch mit den Risiken und Nebenwirkungen von Insekten in der Nahrung.

@LUMINEUSE777 - LUMINEUSE777

19/ ? 🚨⚠️🚨ALERTE MAJEURE du Dr Dorothea THUL : "Ce qu'ils ont fait avec ces injections.... ils tentent de le faire avec la "poudre d'insectes" ! "Cette poudre d'insectes n'est pas ce que vous croyez !" Voir suite de sa lettre au BUNDESTAG (parlement allemand) dans tweet suivant

@LUMINEUSE777 - LUMINEUSE777

20/ ? 🚨⚠️🚨ALERTE MAJEURE du Dr Dorothea THUL : "Ce qu'ils ont fait avec ces injections.... ils tentent de le faire avec la "poudre d'insectes" ! "Cette poudre d'insectes n'est pas ce que vous croyez !"

@LUMINEUSE777 - LUMINEUSE777

21/ ? ⚠️🛑⚠️LISTE DES PRODUITS VISÉS PAR L'AJOUT DE POUDRES D'INSECTES !!! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DAN0Qy2seh4

@LUMINEUSE777 - LUMINEUSE777

22/🚨💥🛑💥🚨 "Les 4 Listes officielles d'aliments à base de farine d'insectes" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TtXAgvI7AT4

@LUMINEUSE777 - LUMINEUSE777

23/? 📢⚠️📢⚠️📢⚠️📢 Selon vidéo ci dessous : "Comment repérer la farine d'insecte sur les paquets ?" Lien : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6PP1k4OCTV8

Video Transcript AI Summary
To determine if food contains insect flour, there are three steps. First, check the ingredients for terms like "farine d'insectes" or specific insect names. Second, look at the protein content, as insect-based products often have high levels. Normal protein levels are around 12g per 100g. Lastly, consider allergies, as the EU requires labeling for crustacean and mite allergies. If uncertain, contact the store or supplier. These techniques can help identify insect flour in food.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Comment selon moi nous pouvons repérer si des aliments contiennent de la farine d'insectes Étape un, je regarde la composition de l'aliment. Alors pour ça, il faut regarder du côté des ingrédients. Qu'est-ce que je regarde dans la composition En premier, je regarde s'il n'est pas directement mentionné le terme farine d'insectes ou alors je regarde s'il n'y a pas une de ces inscriptions sur le papier. Tachuta Domesticus pour la farine de grillant, Alfitobus petit ténébrillon mat pour la farine de l'arbre, tenebrio molitor ou poudre de ténébrillon pour la farine de larves séchée, vers de farine, locusta migratoire pour la farine de cricket migrateur. De toute façon, si vous voyez un nom ressemblant un de ces termes que je viens de citer, vous pouvez vous poser la question. Passons à l'exemple sur ce paquet de pâtes il y a écrit ce moule de blé dure qualité supérieure donc niveau farine ça a l'air ok. Passons à l'étape 2 voir la hauteur en protéines et oui ça paraît simple mais il faut savoir que les à base de farine d'insectes contiennent souvent de haute valeur en protéines. Par exemple voici une véritable liste d'ingrédients dans le passé de pâte à base de farine sur ce paquet il est directement inscrit, farine de blé dur fine gluten et farine de tenebrio molitor dix pour cent. Dans ce paquet pour cent grammes de pâte qui revenons à notre exemple. Je regarde maintenant si la hauteur en protéines a l'air normal. De ce que j'ai pu voir, la hauteur normale en protéines trouve souvent autour des douze grandes max. Donc sur l'exemple en photo le pâté de pâtes contient 12 g de protéines pour 100 g de pâtes ce qui paraît correct. Étape 3, pour finir je regarde du côté des allergies. Concernant la farine d'insectes, Union européenne doit normalement stipuler le risque d'allergie aux crustacés et aux acariens. Donc si vous n'êtes pas sûr et vous voyez dans un aliment risque d'aller agir au crustacé ou à carie, vous pouvez aussi avoir un doute sur la présence d'insectes à l'intérieur. Chacun est libre de faire à sa façon et tout cas je tenais à vous partager les techniques que j'utilise pour le moment. La meilleure façon de savoir si l'aliment contient de la farine d'insectes c'est de contacter le magasin ou le fournisseur. Voilà j'espère que cette vidéo pourra vous aider et n'hésitez pas à la partager.

@LUMINEUSE777 - LUMINEUSE777

24/? 🚨⚠️🚨 ALERTE du DÉPUTÉ EUROPÉEN Hervé JUVIN sur le sujet en 2 vidéos contenues dans le thread ci dessous ! https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1636078111073632257.html

Thread by @LUMINEUSE777 on Thread Reader App @LUMINEUSE777: ⚠️💥 Thread 1/2 CAPITALISME COGNITIF💥⚠️ et NANOTECHNOLOGIES ! 🔥Lien tweet original de @HerveJuvin : Sorry, your browser doesn't support embedded videos ⚠️💥 Thread 2/2 CAPITALISME COGNITIF💥⚠️ et NANOTEC...… threadreaderapp.com

@LUMINEUSE777 - LUMINEUSE777

25/?🚨🚨🚨 AVIS DE L'ANSES DATANT DE 2015 SUR LA CONSOMMATION D'INSECTES https://www.anses.fr/fr/system/files/BIORISK2014sa0153.pdf

Anses - Agence nationale de sécurité sanitaire de l’alimentation, de l’environnement et du travail anses.fr

@LUMINEUSE777 - LUMINEUSE777

@reSeeIt save thread

DjaonBea
Posted - January 10, 2022 at 4:41 PM
Saved - August 31, 2023 at 3:12 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
In this conversation, @DjaonBea and @Victor_Pivert10 discuss the topic of reverse transcriptase and mRNA incorporation into DNA. @DjaonBea claims to have heard from reputable specialists that mRNA can be incorporated into DNA, while @Victor_Pivert10 disagrees. They debate the issue, with @Victor_Pivert10 asserting that @DjaonBea misunderstands the concept. The conversation ends with @Victor_Pivert10 explaining that mRNA is not the same as gene therapy. The conversation also includes a comment about the difference between pro-vax and anti-vax individuals.

@DjaonBea - ✨DJΛӨП BΣΛ✨ (🌿🌺🍀🌳)❤️CO2

@Victor_Pivert10 @TheophileBurlet @AlicePolyanska @BaraleCyprien Non désolé c’est vous le pro. Ce n’est pas à moi de vous expliquer. Mais @CaudeHenrion elle l’explique bien (et d’autres). Je vous vois déjà botter en touche en déclarant que c’est une complotiste. Comment expliquez-vous que je sois mieux informé que vous ?

@Victor_Pivert10 - Victor PIVERT

@DjaonBea @TheophileBurlet @AlicePolyanska @BaraleCyprien @CaudeHenrion Heu, mais il y a une différence entre la prolifération cellulaire et la retrotranscriptase spontanée induite par injection d'un ARNm... Copier un lien ne veutpas dire que vous comprenez ce qui est écrit dedans.

@DjaonBea - ✨DJΛӨП BΣΛ✨ (🌿🌺🍀🌳)❤️CO2

@Victor_Pivert10 @TheophileBurlet @AlicePolyanska @BaraleCyprien @CaudeHenrion peu importe… La transcriptase inverse est possible du fait de je ne sais quoi. Et franchement je ne vais pas noter tout ce que j’entends, je me contente de mémoriser l’essentiel. Donc l’incorporation de l’arn messager dans l’ADN.

@Victor_Pivert10 - Victor PIVERT

@DjaonBea @TheophileBurlet @AlicePolyanska @BaraleCyprien @CaudeHenrion Bah non en fait, toujours pas... Mais au moins vous avouez ne pas comprendre ce qui est écrit mais vous vous en foutez, vous restez convaincu d'un truc totalement faux, et vois expliquez aux gens qui travaillent dans le domaine que ce sont des idiots... Formidable !

@DjaonBea - ✨DJΛӨП BΣΛ✨ (🌿🌺🍀🌳)❤️CO2

@Victor_Pivert10 @TheophileBurlet @AlicePolyanska @BaraleCyprien @CaudeHenrion J’ai bien compris ce qu’est la transcriptase inverse. Une non-spécialisation dans un domaine n’implique pas de ne pas pouvoir comprendre le domaine. Plutôt que de justifier votre opinion sur le sujet, vous osez me juger…

@DjaonBea - ✨DJΛӨП BΣΛ✨ (🌿🌺🍀🌳)❤️CO2

@Victor_Pivert10 @TheophileBurlet @AlicePolyanska @BaraleCyprien @CaudeHenrion Vous posez des affirmations, alors que j’ai entendu des grands spécialistes intègres dire l’inverse. Alors donc selon vous ils se trompent, et alors en quoi se trompent-ils ? pourquoi, comment ? Faites-moi bénéficier de votre savoir !

@Victor_Pivert10 - Victor PIVERT

@DjaonBea @TheophileBurlet @AlicePolyanska @BaraleCyprien @CaudeHenrion Les spécialistes que vous citez ne disent pas l'injection d'un ARNm la provoque. C'est comme si vous ne vouliez pas boire d'eau car l'eau ça bout, et vous avez peur de vous brûler. Sauf que oui l'eau ça bout, mais pas spontanément dans le corps humain...

@DjaonBea - ✨DJΛӨП BΣΛ✨ (🌿🌺🍀🌳)❤️CO2

@Victor_Pivert10 @TheophileBurlet @AlicePolyanska @BaraleCyprien @CaudeHenrion merci infiniment pour votre réponse éclairée ! Grâce a vous et à présent tout est clair dans mon petit cerveau. Je serai fier de citer en référence le grand victor pivert.

@Victor_Pivert10 - Victor PIVERT

@DjaonBea @TheophileBurlet @AlicePolyanska @BaraleCyprien @CaudeHenrion Mais à part ça vous ne jugez pas les gens...🤣 Y a rien de grand dans ce que je vous explique, je comprends ce que ceux que vous citez écrivent, pas vous, car c'est ma formation et mon métier. C'est comme ça, vous êtes compétent dans un autre domaine c'est tout

@Victor_Pivert10 - Victor PIVERT

@DjaonBea @TheophileBurlet @AlicePolyanska @BaraleCyprien @CaudeHenrion Je ne sais pas quel domaine, et je me garderais bien de venir vous expliquer que vous êtes un idiot alors que je n'y connais rien...

@DjaonBea - ✨DJΛӨП BΣΛ✨ (🌿🌺🍀🌳)❤️CO2

@Victor_Pivert10 @TheophileBurlet @CaudeHenrion Réussir un examen ne signifie pas être compétent.

@raoult_didier - Didier Raoult

Cet article met en évidence une transformation de l'ARN du vaccin Pfizer en ADN dans des cultures de cellules hépatiques, posant la question de leur intégration dans le génome. Il est accessible en cliquant sur ce lien : https://www.mdpi.com/1467-3045/44/3/73/htm

Intracellular Reverse Transcription of Pfizer BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 In Vitro in Human Liver Cell Line Preclinical studies of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine BNT162b2, developed by Pfizer and BioNTech, showed reversible hepatic effects in animals that received the BNT162b2 injection. Furthermore, a recent study showed that SARS-CoV-2 RNA can be reverse-transcribed and integrated into the genome of human cells. In this study, we investigated the effect of BNT162b2 on the human liver cell line Huh7 in vitro. Huh7 cells were exposed to BNT162b2, and quantitative PCR was performed on RNA extracted from the cells. We detected high levels of BNT162b2 in Huh7 cells and changes in gene expression of long interspersed nuclear element-1 (LINE-1), which is an endogenous reverse transcriptase. Immunohistochemistry using antibody binding to LINE-1 open reading frame-1 RNA-binding protein (ORFp1) on Huh7 cells treated with BNT162b2 indicated increased nucleus distribution of LINE-1. PCR on genomic DNA of Huh7 cells exposed to BNT162b2 amplified the DNA sequence unique to BNT162b2. Our results indicate a fast up-take of BNT162b2 into human liver cell line Huh7, leading to changes in LINE-1 expression and distribution. We also show that BNT162b2 mRNA is reverse transcribed intracellularly into DNA in as fast as 6 h upon BNT162b2 exposure. mdpi.com

@Victor_Pivert10 - Victor PIVERT

@TheophileBurlet @AlicePolyanska @BaraleCyprien Alors dîtes moi d'où il sort ce rapport ? De quoi parle-t-il ? Quand a-t-il été publié ? Car il est écrit noir sur blanc que cela ne fonctionne pas comme une thérapie génique... Regardez, je vous mets un lien moi aussi https://www.sante.fr/decryptage/nos-reponses/les-vaccins-arnm-contre-la-covid-19-sont-ils-une-forme-de-therapie-genique

Les vaccins à ARNm sont-ils une forme de thérapie génique ? Certains vaccins contre la Covid-19 utilisant de l’ARN messager, certaines personnes ont exprimé leur crainte que ce matériel génétique puisse être à l’origine de problèmes de santé. sante.fr

@Victor_Pivert10 - Victor PIVERT

@TheophileBurlet @AlicePolyanska @BaraleCyprien Ok, donc vu le rapport et sa date, on est donc d'accord que ce n'est plus le cas... Merci, au revoir.

@Victor_Pivert10 - Victor PIVERT

@TheophileBurlet @AlicePolyanska @BaraleCyprien C'est "une forme" de thérapie génique 🤔 Cette techo n'ayant pas été utilisée avant comme vaccin, elle était considérée comme telle par la FDA, même si ça n'en est pas une (c'est ce qui est écrit dans votre extrait !). Donc faut savoir hein... Et je vois que vous avez une envie

@Victor_Pivert10 - Victor PIVERT

@TheophileBurlet @AlicePolyanska @BaraleCyprien De m'apprendre mon métier, mais non, ce n'est pas une thérapie génique. Pour faire simple, la thérapie génique induit l'introduction d'un fragment d'ADN dans les chromosomes... Ce qui n'est évidemment par le cas avec l'arnm (qu'on trouve dans le blé, les légumes, etc...).

@Victor_Pivert10 - Victor PIVERT

@TheophileBurlet @AlicePolyanska @BaraleCyprien Vois en ingérez en grande quantité, quand vois mangez de la salade, du pain par exemple... Et pour autant cela ne modifie pas votre génome.

@DjaonBea - ✨DJΛӨП BΣΛ✨ (🌿🌺🍀🌳)❤️CO2

@Victor_Pivert10 @TheophileBurlet @AlicePolyanska @BaraleCyprien Pour un soi-disant pro, vous ignorez la transcriptase inverse…

@Victor_Pivert10 - Victor PIVERT

@DjaonBea @TheophileBurlet @AlicePolyanska @BaraleCyprien La retrotranscriptase spontanée chez l'homme 🤔 Expliquez moi, je vous écoute, vous avez toute mon attention...

@Agroufioun - Agroufioun

Il y a tout de même un différence terrible entre l'antivax et le prox : le provax veut imposer le vax à tous, l'antivax ne veut pas du vax pour lui. Il faudrait trouver un autre terme que provax : Totalivax ? TotalitariVax ? TyraniVax ?

@Victor_Pivert10 - Victor PIVERT

@AlicePolyanska @BaraleCyprien Non ce n'est pas un traitement génique...🙄

@Victor_Pivert10 - Victor PIVERT

@TheophileBurlet @AlicePolyanska @BaraleCyprien Ce ne sont pas de croyances, j'ai quelques compétences dans le domaine... Tu comprends ce que tu me montres ?

MFesneau
Posted - September 4, 2023 at 11:04 AM
Saved - September 4, 2023 at 3:32 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The government's priority is to end misleading labeling. A new decree will prohibit the use of terms that imply plant-based foods are of animal origin. This promotes transparency and meets the legitimate expectations of consumers and producers. Maintaining trust in labeling is crucial, whether it's about animal or plant products, origin, geographical indications, or labels. This policy aims to ensure transparency and loyalty towards consumers.

@MFesneau - Marc Fesneau

Mettre fin aux allégations trompeuses sur les étiquetages est une priorité du @gouvernementFR. Nous avons donc travaillé à la rédaction d’un nouveau décret visant l’interdiction d’utiliser pour les denrées alimentaires végétales des dénominations évoquant des denrées alimentaires d’origine animale. C’est un enjeu de transparence et de loyauté qui répond à une attente légitime des consommateurs et des producteurs. Garder le lien de confiance avec les consommateurs sur l’étiquetage et son intelligibilité est essentiel : → Dans le domaine animal comme végétal ; → Dans le domaine de l’origine des produits comme dans celui des indications géographique protégée ou des labels. Cette politique ne sert qu’un objectif : la transparence et la loyauté vis à vis du consommateur.

@Agri_Gouv - Ministère Agriculture et Souveraineté alimentaire

Communiqué 📢 | Le Ministre @MFesneau réaffirme l’interdiction d’utiliser pour les denrées alimentaires végétales des dénominations évoquant des denrées alimentaires d’origine animale ⤵️ https://agriculture.gouv.fr/le-ministre-reaffirme-linterdiction-dutiliser-pour-les-denrees-alimentaires-vegetales-des

Denrées alimentaires végétales : interdiction d’utiliser des dénominations évoquant des denrées alimentaires d’origine animale Un nouveau décret de la loi étiquetage du 10 juin 2020 fixe la liste des termes dont l'utilisation est interdite pour la désignation des denrées alimentaires comportant des protéines végétales et la liste des termes autorisés pour la désignation des denrées alimentaires d'origine animale pouvant contenir des protéines végétales ainsi que la part maximale de protéines végétales que peuvent contenir les denrées pour lesquelles ces termes sont utilisés. agriculture.gouv.fr
Thekeksociety
Posted - September 7, 2023 at 6:12 PM
Saved - September 7, 2023 at 7:28 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) claim to solve world hunger but have devastating consequences. They are linked to illnesses like cancer, heart disease, and fertility problems. Pesticides and gene editing in GMOs are poorly regulated worldwide. Even our meat and milk are being mRNA vaccinated. Monsanto, the creator of Agent Orange, harassed farmers and monopolized the food industry. GMOs flood the market, making natural options expensive. Beware of changing fruit structures. Pesticides are harmful to humans. Avoid Apeel brand. Food shortages are used to control farmers. Big Pharma owns the food industry. Let's expose this together.

@Thekeksociety - DR. Kek

THE GENETICALLY MODIFIED ORGANISM thread… 💉 https://t.co/vxM85WK70m

@Thekeksociety - DR. Kek

WHAT IS GMO? Said to SOLVE WORLD HUNDER! But it in fact, KILLS THE POPULATION! https://t.co/7lvsrCvrlI

Video Transcript AI Summary
GMOs, or genetically modified organisms, were once believed to be a solution for world hunger, promising benefits like drought resistance, higher yields, improved nutrition, and reduced pesticide use. However, the reality is quite different. The majority of GMOs on the market today serve two purposes: producing insecticides within the plant itself and being resistant to herbicides. This means that bugs that consume these plants die, and the plants can be sprayed with toxic herbicides without being harmed. Consequently, we are now consuming plants that act as pesticide factories and have been exposed to herbicides.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: GMO actually means genetically modified organism. GMOs have been promoted as a solution to world hunger, that they would lead to more drought resistant crops and bigger yields, that they would lead to better nutrition and flavor and less pesticide consumption. But in reality, they haven't accomplished any of those things. The vast majority of the GMOs on the market today have done is 1 or both of 2 things. Number 1, they are pesticide producers, which means They produce the insecticide BT in every cell of the plant. So a bug, certain bugs take a bite, their stomach split open and they die. Number 2 is that they are herbicide resistant, which means you can spray them with Roundup or two four d or certain other toxic herbicides and they'll kill the weeds, but they won't kill the plant that we're growing. So now we are eating plants that are living pesticide factories. They produce pesticide in every cell of the plant and we're eating plants that have been sprayed with herbicides.

@Thekeksociety - DR. Kek

GMOS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR MANY ILLNESSES + DEATHS! GMO CAN CAUSE: ⚠️ CANCER ⚠️ NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS ⚠️ HEART DISEASE ⚠️ DIABETES ⚠️ DEPRESSION / ADHD ⚠️ FERTILITY PROBLEMS ⚠️ POPULATION CONTROL https://t.co/d8JWYlY7ME

@Thekeksociety - DR. Kek

THE INTRODUCTION OF PESTICIDES / MRNA GENE EDITING MODS ARE LIMITLESS!!! + LESS REGULATED AROUND THE WORLD! WHAT ARE YOU EATING? ARE YOU BEING VACCINATED AS YOU EAT??? https://t.co/howSCFEvTu

@Thekeksociety - DR. Kek

KNOW WHAT FRUIT YOU SHOULD BE BUYING + WHAT YOU SHOULD STAY AWAY FROM! https://t.co/sdITtReKz2

@Thekeksociety - DR. Kek

DID YOU KNOW YOUR MEAT 🥩 + MILK 🥛 ARE ALREADY BEING MRNA VACCINATED? + COMPLETELY ALTERED! https://t.co/T0U5HY57UN

Video Transcript AI Summary
The Gates Foundation and Difida have partnered on various projects, including their work on livestock. They aim to improve animal survival through vaccines and better genetics, resulting in increased productivity. This has had a significant impact in Ethiopia, where chickens are laying more eggs, providing better nutrition, and even contributing to small savings in households. Edinburgh is a hub for top-notch research in this field, which is why Dipit and the Gates Foundation are funding scientists there.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, the Gates Foundation has partnered with Difida on a great number of things. And, among those are our work we do together on livestock. Helping animals survive, either by having vaccines or better genetics, helping them be more productive. It's making a big difference, You know, it's down in Ethiopia, seeing how chickens are out there, laying more eggs, getting more nutrition, and even some small savings into the household. So, Edinburgh happens to be where a lot of the world's best work on this is done, and that's why, Dipit and the Gates Foundation are funding scientists here. Okay. That's it. Fine. Yeah. Go ahead. Let's start.

@Thekeksociety - DR. Kek

IT’S BEING DONE ON A MASSIVE SCALE! https://t.co/OaOjVy70As

@Thekeksociety - DR. Kek

LET’S TALK ABOUT MONSANTO! 🌿 MONSANTO CREATED THE TOXIN AGENT ORANGE 🟧 WHICH WAS RAINED DOWN ON VIETNAM KILLING CROPS + PEOPLE! https://t.co/L0G4FlGYiQ

Video Transcript AI Summary
During the Vietnam War, the Vietcong used guerrilla warfare tactics against American forces in the dense rainforest. To combat this, the US sprayed 19.5 million gallons of Agent Orange, an herbicide, which devastated the ecosystem. However, the long-term effects on the Vietnamese population were severe. Evidence showed that Dioxin, a contaminant in Agent Orange, caused birth defects. These defects have affected around 3 million Vietnamese, including 150,000 children, causing various health issues such as cancer and heart disease. The US provided $400 million in aid for cleanup and victim care, but only $125 million reached the victims, amounting to about $41 per person. The cleanup projects remain unfinished, and the US and its companies refused to take responsibility in court.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In the jungles of Vietnam, American forces encountered a foe that used the same tactics the American Revolutionary Army used to gain independence from Britain. They were the Vietcong and adopted guerrilla warfare, a fighting style that proved to be very effective in the dense rainforest. It was devastating for American military. So with aerial port 19,500,000 gallons of an herbicide called Agent Orange was sprayed into the thick foliage. It destroyed the ecosystem and left the jungles fare. Little did the Vietnamese know, however, how devastating the effects would be on the population for generations to come. On the other hand, according to the New York Times, quote, the defense department and manufacturer were aware of evidence indicating that Dioxin, a contaminant in the herbicide, might cause birth defects in the children of women post of the defoliant. What do these birth defects look like? Well, bad. They have caused debilitating defects and have affected or reported 3,000,000 Vietnamese, including including a 150,000 children. The reported health issues caused are cancers, heart disease, spina bifida, oral clefts, hypospadias, and more. US responded by providing a total of $400,000,000 in aid to assist with the environmental cleanup and victim care. Only a 125,000,000 has been given to the victims, however, and although that sounds like a lot, it only provides about $41 to each victim. Additionally, the cleanup projects have not been finished, and the war ended in 1975. Worst of all, the US and its companies refused to claim any responsibility for the damage caused by the chemicals in court after a class action in lawsuit was filed.

@Thekeksociety - DR. Kek

MONSANTO🌿 AFTER DESTROYING THE LIVES OF VIETNAMESE, WENT ON TO CREATE THEIR PESTICIDES + COW GROWTH HORMONES https://t.co/iBtF3gyPfs

@Thekeksociety - DR. Kek

MONSANTO🌿 WENT TO WAR ON FARMERS WHO FAILED TO ACCEPT MONSANTO’S GMO SEEDS MONSANTO🌿💉 DECIDED TO CREATE SEED THAT CAN SURVIVE WITH LESS WATER + BRING IN A HIGHER YEALD. NATURAL FARMERS WHO CHOSE NOT TO USE MONSANTO’S SEEDS + PESTICIDES, WHERE HARASSED https://t.co/crKJm0KJoL

Video Transcript AI Summary
Farmers have been saving and planting seeds for thousands of years, but the idea of corporations owning food crops is relatively new. In the 1980s, the Supreme Court allowed the patenting of life, leading to companies like Monsanto patenting valuable crops. Monsanto, a chemical company known for products like DDT and Agent Orange, developed Roundup and genetically engineered soybeans that could resist it. Farmers initially resisted the idea of not being able to save their own seeds, but over time, acceptance grew. Now, if a farmer saves seeds, Monsanto, the main company involved, may send investigators to look into the matter.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: 10000 years ago, farmers started saving their best seeds and planting again in the following year. That's how seeds have been developed. That's how corn was developed from, a useless grass for the most part to to the extremely productive plant it is today. The idea that any corporation could own a food crop, you know, is a very new idea. It wasn't until 1980s that the Supreme Court said you could patent life. And that opened the floodgates, efforts to patent the most valuable parts of life, which is to say, the crops on which we depend. Monsanto is a chemical company. They produced DDT, Agent Orange in Vietnam and then they developed a product called Roundup. We started hearing rumblings about genetically engineered soybeans that could resist the application of Roundup. And when the Roundup sprayed over the top of it, it killed every weed out there except for this Roundup ready soybean. You know, I can remember when the 1st prohibitions against seed saving came into being, you know, and those farmers were just absolutely disgusted with the whole concept. And it's been interesting over the course of 11 years to watch watch us go from utter contempt for the notion that we can't save our own seed to acceptance. What happens if a farmer saves the seeds? Well, you know, this really there's only 1 company involved in this now and that's Monsanto. Montana is They've got a team of private investigators that kind of roam the country and they've got a little 1-eight hundred hotline they take calls on. And if they get a call and somebody alleges that somebody saved seed, they'll send an investigator out to look into the matter. And you save your own seed, you're going to get a call from somebody from Monsanto.

@Thekeksociety - DR. Kek

MONSANTO🌿 EVEN SENT AGENTS OUT TO HARASS FARMER WHO USED SPECIAL CLEANING EQUIPMENT INSTEAD OF THEIR HARMFUL PESTICIDES! https://t.co/yPv7dE3HFm

Video Transcript AI Summary
Two men arrived at my house in the evening, showing me a black card without disclosing they were from Manzano. They claimed to have a surveillance team monitoring me, causing me to wake up at 3 or 4 in the morning to avoid them. These individuals seemed to have a military or police background, appearing large and intimidating. I'm unsure if they had a surveillance team or if it was my neighbor who reported me. As I headed inside, one of them remarked that I was guilty. They mentioned a device from the 1800s used for planting seeds and speculated there might be around 6 of them in Indiana. Previously, every county had 3, but now they have all been removed.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: 2 men drove in my driveway at about 7, 7:30 at night, presented a black card to me. They never told me that they were from Manzano. Speaker 1: They said that they had had a surveillance team got me clammed in. I found it necessary to get up at 3 and 4 in the morning before the investigators are on the road following me. Speaker 0: They were, I'm gonna say, like, maybe ex military or or ex police. They were large and they were intimidating. Speaker 1: And I don't know whether they had a surveillance team or whether it was my neighbor that turned me in. I don't know. And as I Speaker 0: turned to walk in the house, one of them said, I hear in the back, he's guilty. It's a real ingenious device designed back in the 1800s So how many seed planters are out there in the country you believe in? Speaker 1: In the state of Indiana, there may be 6. Speaker 0: Maybe. I'm not a woman. I used to be. Oh my god. Every county had 3. They've all been Speaker 1: put out there. There's nobody left.

@Thekeksociety - DR. Kek

THE MONSANTO🌿 PLAN TO FIGHT WORLD HUNGER TURNED INTO THE WEAPONIZATION OF FOOD! https://t.co/rd85b8msbt

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker explains that they never switched to Monsanto Soybeans because they were getting good yields with conventional soybeans. They mention that their neighbors all use GMO soybeans, which can affect their crops. Another speaker points out that when a crop is genetically modified, the company owns it, which is a new concept in agriculture. They compare Monsanto to Microsoft, saying that Monsanto aims to own the intellectual property behind most of the food in America. Public plant breeding is now rare, and there are only a few varieties of soybeans available. The speaker expresses concern about not being able to buy certified seed and mentions a blacklist of unauthorized growers. They are on the list because they refused to turn over their records. The speaker concludes by discussing the limitations they face in choosing what to plant.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: When Monsanto Soybeans first came on the market, I just really never switched over. I was getting pretty good yields with with the conventional soybeans I've been using, so I thought, well, I'll just Speaker 1: stay where I'm at. My neighbors all just All around me are all GMO. The pollen blows in, if the seed moves in, I am still held accountable. Just Speaker 2: When you genetically modify a crop, you own it. We've never had this in agriculture. Speaker 3: It used to be that your land grant universities, they developed what was called public seed. Just The vast majority of the plant breeding was actually done in these public institutions. Speaker 2: Monsanto is very much like Microsoft. Just The same way Microsoft owns the intellectual property behind most computers in America, they set out to own the intellectual property behind most of Speaker 3: the food in America. Just Public plant breeding is a thing in the past. There virtually are no public seeds anymore. Speaker 1: Just So, like I said, there's only like 4 or 5 varieties I can actually plant. Now, I have some of the last soybeans coming out of the scene of Illinois. Just buy it. The GMO, okay. Let me ride it. But like I said, when it comes down to the point where I can't buy any more certified seed, what do I do? What are my options? Just I acquired this list that was mailed to me. The blacklist here is Monsanto's unauthorized grower list. Just Wow. Either farmers that have judgments against them or businesses or else it's already or it's farmers that have not submitted their paperwork, just Will not turn over the records. Wow. And then for my case, that's why I'm on there because I would not turn over my records. Am I on this list? Yes. You are. Just Wow. I see 2 of my farmers that I work for are on here. This list now, it comes down to the point where just I cannot buy Monsanto products. Okay? Right. So it's coming down to what can I plant? Just Monsanto is doing me on the basis that I'm encouraging the farmer to break the patent by cleaning their own

@Thekeksociety - DR. Kek

MONSANTO🌿 USED THEIR POWER TO GAIN POLITICAL, LEGAL + PHARMACEUTICAL HEADS TO CREATE AN UNTOUCHABLE PROTECTION AFTER HAVING TO PAYOUT A SETTLEMENT OF $10 BILLION https://t.co/Ph8eGSuA3e

Video Transcript AI Summary
There is a concerning connection between Monsanto and regulatory bodies, with Justice Clarence Thomas being a former Monsanto attorney. He wrote the majority opinion in a case that allowed companies to prevent farmers from saving their own seed. Monsanto had close ties to both the Bush and Clinton administrations. Over the past 25 years, our government has been dominated by the industries it was meant to regulate. The issue lies in the interests these regulators choose to represent. This centralized power is being used against farmers, workers, and consumers who are kept in the dark about their food.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There has been this revolving door between Monsanto's corporate offices and the various regulatory and judicial bodies that have made the key decisions. Justice Clarence Thomas was the Monsanto attorney. That wouldn't be such a big deal if it weren't for 1 court case that really decided this whole seed Saving issue. Justice Clarence Thomas wrote the majority opinion in a case that allowed these companies to prevent farmers from saving their own seed. Speaker 1: Monsanto had very close ties to the Bush administration and the Clinton administration. Speaker 0: And and this goes to why we haven't had much political debate over over this radical change to our food Speaker 1: The last 25 years, our government has been dominated by the industries that it was meant to be regulated. Speaker 0: The challenge is sometimes you have people with expertise in industry that may turn out to be really good regulators. It's really about what interests they decide to represent. Speaker 1: You're talking about power, centralized power. And that power is being used against the people who are really producing the food like the farmers. It's being used against the workers who work for these companies, And it's being used against consumers who are deliberately being kept in the dark about what they're eating, where it comes from, and

@Thekeksociety - DR. Kek

THE PAST 30+ YEARS GMO FOOD HAS FLOODED THE MARKETS, TURNING A MONOPOLY OF THE FOOD INDUSTRY! TO BUY ANYTHING NATURAL A CONSUMER IS RESPONSIBLE IN PAYING UPWARDS TO 30% INCREASE, MAKING MANY UNABLE TO LIVE HEALTHY! https://t.co/jvGovUKDUB

Video Transcript AI Summary
SB 63 is a consumer right to know measure that requires labeling of cloned foods. One speaker criticizes the FDA for allowing the sale of meat from cloned animals without further research and without labeling. Another speaker from the California Farm Bureau opposes labeling, arguing that it creates unnecessary fear and that educating consumers about the value of cloning technology is more important. The first speaker highlights how various industries have fought against labeling in the past, emphasizing the importance of consumers knowing what's in their food. A third speaker expresses concern about potential legal consequences for criticizing the meat and poultry industry. The conversation ends with a mention of veggie libel laws being different.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Good afternoon, Madam Chair and members. SB 63 is a consumer right to know measure. It simply requires that all foods that are cloned must be labeled as cloned foods. Speaker 1: These cloned animals are a fundamentally new thing. But I find it incredible that the FDA not only wants to allow the sale of meat from cloned animals without further research, But also wants to allow the sale of this meat without any labeling. Speaker 2: Other witnesses in opposition please. Newell Kramer with California Farm Bureau. And if I can point out, the reason that we are concerned with labeling is it creates unnecessary fear in consumers' mind until the industry has an opportunity To educate why we want to use this technology and the value of the technology. We don't feel that consumers just having a warning label will help them. Speaker 1: These companies fight Tooth and nail against labeling. The fast food industry fought against giving you the calorie information. They fought against telling you if there is trans fat in their food. The meatpacking industry for years prevented country of origin labeling. They fought not to label genetically modified foods and now 70% of processed food in the supermarket has some genetically modified ingredients. I think it's one of the most important battles for consumers to fight is is the right to know what what's in their food and how it was grown. Not only do they not want you to know what's in it, they have managed to make it against the law to criticize their products. Can you tell me how you've changed how you eat? Speaker 3: Yeah. We You're gonna you probably have to call talk to an attorney before you would put this in there. Speaker 1: I know, Speaker 3: but but I could have the meat and poultry industry coming after me and I really It depends on the context. You're not saying someone else here Yeah. I'm sorry, Robbie, but I get asked this all the time and and you know initially my reaction Action was I don't care. Let them sue me. Let them try and sue the mother of a dead child and see. Speaker 1: It's pretty amazing that you can't say how Speaker 3: Well, the veggie libel laws with are are are different.

@Thekeksociety - DR. Kek

GMOS IN FRUIT 🍉 HAVE YOU NOTICED YOUR FRUIT STRUCTURE CHANGING? HAVE YOU NOTICED HOW FRUIT IS CHANGING IN GENERAL? https://t.co/TSDr4P3CU5

Video Transcript AI Summary
A person discovered their watermelon had exploded overnight, leaving a messy table. They were unsure why it happened and found the inside of the watermelon unusual, almost like it was artificially made. This incident made them hesitant to eat watermelons in the future. Another person expressed their frustration with the situation and mentioned hearing a whistling sound before their own watermelon exploded. They advised against consuming genetically modified foods.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Walmart watermelon exploding everywhere. Speaker 1: I, so I came downstairs, and all of the guts of my watermelon was all over my table as you can see here. So I guess overnight, my watermelon exploded, combusted, and I'm not sure why. So Here it is again. The inside looks crazy. It really looks like it is a man made watermelon. It doesn't look like And natural, intricately grown watermelon. However, I'm just baffled, and I'm not really sure If I wanna eat watermelons ever again. Speaker 0: What the actual f c k is going on with our watermelon. Hank Green. It's now so bad. Speaker 1: The 2nd war Speaker 0: I cannot make this act. I heard a whistling sound in the pantry, and then my watermelon exploded like a. Stop eating GMO's food.

@Thekeksociety - DR. Kek

THIS IS HOW DEADLY THE PESTICIDES ARE ON HUMANS! https://t.co/sQ9OJU4Wj0

Video Transcript AI Summary
McDonald's uses russet Burbank potatoes for their French fries worldwide. These potatoes are long and difficult to grow, but McDonald's prefers them for their iconic red boxes with long chips. However, McDonald's has strict requirements for their potatoes, insisting on no blemishes. One common defect is net necrosis, which causes brown lines on the potatoes. To eliminate this defect, farmers in Idaho use a highly toxic pesticide called monitor. The farmers cannot enter their fields for 5 days after spraying. After harvesting, the potatoes need to be stored in large atmosphere-controlled sheds for 6 weeks to remove all the chemicals.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You go to McDonald's anywhere in the world, you will find French fries, and you will find that they're always made from the same potato, the russet Burbank potato from America that's unusually long and difficult to grow, but that's what they want. When you're McDonald's, you like those red boxes with a little bouquet of very long chip. And they further insist is that they have no blemishes at all. And there's a very common defect of russet Burbank potatoes called net necrosis. And you've seen potatoes with little brown lines, but McDonald's Owls won't buy them. And the only way to eliminate that is to eliminate an aphid. And the only way to do that is with a pesticide called monitor. That is so toxic that the farmers who grow these potatoes in Idaho dachoe won't venture outside into their fields for 5 days after they spray. And then when they harvest their potatoes, they they have to put them in these atmosphere controlled sheds the size of a football stadium because they're not edible for 6 weeks. They have to off gas all the chemicals in

@Thekeksociety - DR. Kek

STAY AWAY FROM THE BRAND “APEEL!” https://t.co/FOf7oTA7so

Video Transcript AI Summary
I ruined taco night by buying nonorganic avocados. Appeal is a plant-based coating applied to fruits and vegetables to slow spoiling, funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. It aims to save food waste and energy costs. However, I have concerns about its safety and the potential for toxic residues. It may also affect our ability to choose fresh, nutrient-dense produce. The coating could lock in toxins that are difficult to wash off, even on organic produce. This means that even organic avocados could be months old without us knowing. Overall, this technology doesn't prioritize the highest quality or most nutrient-dense food.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Dude, I ruined taco night. I grabbed nonorganic avocados. It's just the avocados, bro, and they have some of the lowest toxin residues anyway. But if I were to cancel taco night, that avocado would have had an appeal label. What's appeal? Appeal is an invisible plant based coating that is now being applied to fruits and vegetables to slow spoiling. Funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation to help save food waste, energy costs, all of it. That sounds wonderful. Saving food, energy, and the it, we'll see, but I'm definitely not sold on this coating. I'm not gonna argue whether this all natural, non GMO coating is safe to consume, despite the ingredients likely being extracted with toxic solvents. In fact, if you look on the FDA website, appeal sciences that set limits for how much of these toxic residues that can remain in the finished product. But what I'm most concerned about is how this affects our ability to shoes, high nutrient dense fruits and vegetables that are in season and recently harvested. So what you're saying is the good old days of finding the freshest produce possible, maybe over. Great point. My last challenge with this technology is that this coating may lock in toxins that I can't easily wash off anymore. Even organic produce uses approved that I wanna wash off. So this can be used in organic produce. If these were organic avocados using a peel, they could be months old, and I wouldn't know. And that's not prioritizing the highest quality or most nutrient dense food possible, and it definitely doesn't sound appealing to my taste buds either.

@Thekeksociety - DR. Kek

L👀K OUT FOR FOOD SHORTAGES! THIS IS WHAT THEY DO CONTROL FARMERS!!! IT’S LIKE THE MAFIA! https://t.co/EYnlLwW8j4

Video Transcript AI Summary
Farmers in the agriculture industry are being offered 1.5 times the value of their crops to destroy them. The federal government is also withholding subsidies for farming if crops are not destroyed. This creates a system where farmers cannot afford to provide food without government support. The government is trying to create a food shortage by paying farmers to destroy their crops. Farmers have received destruction notices and are given the option to manually destroy their crops for extra money. The government is providing instructions on how to properly dispose of the crops. This situation is concerning as it affects both food and energy control, limiting freedom.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Worker got talking today and something came up that I didn't really think about when my dad mentioned it to me. He's worked in the agriculture industry for over 40 years. This year, farmers are being offered 1.5 times the value of their crops to destroy them. They're also being told by the federal government they will not 4 received subsidies for farming if they refuse to destroy their crops. What does that mean? That means that the farmer cannot afford to provide you with food based upon the taxes the government is levying on him if the government doesn't in turn give him back his tax money to provide you with food. Kind of a fucked up system, but that's how it works. And, 4th well. They're not gonna subsidize them if they don't destroy the crops. They'll pay them more than what it's worth, and they want them to destroy it. And they'll still get their subsidies. They're trying to create a food shortage. We've got 8 months to get our own food supply. We're we're probably gonna be facing mass Speaker 1: starvation. Is it true that Speaker 2: the government is paying farmers to destroy their crops? 4 And the simple answer to that is yes, they are. Speaker 3: Initially heard about the government paying farmers to destroy their crops, I thought it Speaker 2: was a load of bullshit. Well, lo Speaker 3: and behold, we received our destruction notice the other day. So basically, there's 2 options on how to destroy the crop. The government could fly on agent orange or we could manually destroy the crop ourselves. Oh, we put too much blood, sweat, and tears in it to let them destroy it, so we decided to manually do it ourselves. Basically, it said if we use the lawnmower to destroy the crop, we could receive an extra $600 an acre, something about the low carbon footprint or something. So that's what we're doing. Speaker 4: I got my letter yesterday, to 5 package, which included these these 2 binders and then, of course, this 3 ring binder on how to properly dispose of your crops. And as you can tell, it's on government paper. And as you can tell, this here is the affected area in my section of the county, closest town and, Speaker 1: of Speaker 4: course, you can't run away where you live. So from the county tracks, then they break it down into these individual farm tracks you have to destroy. And you can see the the crop or the field. Speaker 0: 4 matter where Speaker 1: This is the 2nd machine that I dropped off here for the local farmers. Just wanna show you a little bit of each drum. We got 4 of these drums, 2 on each side. Now you can imagine the damage they can do, not counting the blade which you could set down. So this will be the 1st field that we take care of. So what we're gonna do is mash everything into the ground, and then I'm gonna go pick up some steel plates, lay them across the road, road plates, So we can get the machines over there, start on that farm. So the farmers got paid by the government. I don't understand understand what it's all about, but they got paid. Now they hired us to come in here and just destroy whatever we can. I don't understand how it all works, but We're already paid for a certain amount of time. You could hear the 1st machine already running out there. But when you hear them from us saying they're getting paid to Destroy everything. They ain't bullshitting y'all. Y'all better start paying attention. Speaker 2: Well, what you saw right there ought to concern you. I was doing exactly what I was told via a letter I got last night in the mail from the Department of Hydrocarbons. They said in order to stabilize oil prices, they need a bunch of oil just dumped and not dumped on the market, just dumped on lease roads and field roads and things like that. So I'm hooked up to that oil tank 4 going straight into my truck to get rid of it. Well, I'm gonna get fined if I don't get rid of it, they said. So that prompted me to call district selectmen Tony Delosian and asked him about this letter. He said he didn't know much about it, but he would suggest that I follow whatever it says. So here we go. These are some serious times right now. Since January, oil prices have been through the roof. 4 years. I'm seeing more and more farmers on TikTok saying that the government is paying them to kill their fields, Agent Orange. I saw a guy with a lawnmower mowing down beans getting paid to do it. 4. They're controlling food, now they're going to control energy. I don't understand why this is going on, but I tell you what, if they control food and they control energy, what freedom do you have left?

@Thekeksociety - DR. Kek

PLEASE TRY HARD TO RAISE YOUR FAMILY AWAY FROM THE CABAL FEEDING SYSTEM! KNOW THAT BIG PHARMA OWNS THE FOOD INDUSTRY! FOLLOW DR. KEK TO LEARN MORE! COMMENT BELOW! MAKE DR. KEK YOUR BEST FRIEND! LET’S EXPOSE EVIL TOGETHER!

supercarbon
Posted - September 10, 2023 at 1:23 PM
Saved - September 15, 2023 at 4:02 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Scientists urged governments to end chemical farming, promoting nature-friendly agriculture to feed everyone sustainably. A 2008 report funded by the World Bank, involving 400 scientists, showed the unsustainability of chemical agriculture. Governments blocked the report, favoring chemical farming. Pesticide companies lobbied against it, gaining control over our food system. Biotech giants now surpass governments in power, polluting our planet and collecting subsidies. Sustainable small-farmer agriculture is the solution. Support local nature-friendly farms to combat corporate damage and hunger.

@supercarbon - Graham Harvey

You may not know this. After in-depth global study, scientists urged UK and US governments to end ‘experiment’ in chemical farming. They said nature-friendly agriculture would feed everyone without wrecking the planet. If you’re not aware it’s because governments buried the study https://t.co/Jna2hBALbp

@supercarbon - Graham Harvey

Called IAASTD, the report was published 2008. Funded by World Bank, it involved 400 scientists. They showed chemical agriculture was unsustainable. Ecological agriculture would feed the world better. Government blocked it and went on subsidising chemical farming. Here’s why https://t.co/iq6IDRE1wk

@supercarbon - Graham Harvey

Pesticide companies lobbied hard against the report, which threatened their global chemical market. They leaned on governments which quickly caved in and blocked the report. Elected politicians effectively handed control of our food to chemical corporations https://t.co/kyu1Z4qmmk

@supercarbon - Graham Harvey

Even government scientists backed the chemical corporations against the scientific report. UK chief scientist Beddington warned of ‘perfect storm’ – population growth, climate change, water shortage – creating fear and helping pesticide giants https://t.co/mKpOp6P2oG

@supercarbon - Graham Harvey

Working through G7 and G20 economic forums, the biotech giants have tightened their stranglehold on the world food system. They are now more powerful than governments. Their products go on polluting our planet, contaminating food, destroying nature, collecting subsidies https://t.co/UUvjrgjFlp

@supercarbon - Graham Harvey

Science is now clear – nature-friendly, small-farmer agriculture is sustainable way to feed the world – and cool our planet. The view that chemicals are needed is a myth perpetrated by agribiz. The tragedy is our politicians and world leaders have bought into it. https://t.co/b2d1i9zWQY

@supercarbon - Graham Harvey

Ours is a world of abundance. If hunger threatens it’s because corporate power is damaging the natural systems we need to feed and protect us. Governments have failed us. But the solution is in our hands – buy local food from nature-friendly farms. Their numbers are growing https://t.co/YEyySQydLr

laquadrature
Posted - September 12, 2023 at 3:09 PM
Saved - September 13, 2023 at 12:44 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The proposed law aims to regulate the digital space, but it's a guise for the government to tighten its control over the internet. It includes measures like age verification for porn sites, which undermines online anonymity. The government also wants platforms to verify users' age, ultimately requiring everyone to prove their identity before signing up. Additionally, social media platforms could be banned if they fail to verify users' identities, even if they're convicted of harassment. The law introduces administrative censorship, forcing browsers to block URLs flagged by the police. Unfortunately, there are no measures to promote social media interoperability, which could regulate platforms without increasing their dominance. To defend a free and decentralized internet, support organizations fighting against this law.

@laquadrature - La Quadrature du Net

Le projet de loi visant à sécuriser et réguler l’espace numérique arrive à l'Assemblée. Ce texte se dit vouloir réguler Internet dans la continuité de l'Union européenne. En réalité, le gouvernement veut accroître son contrôle sur Internet. https://www.laquadrature.net/2023/09/12/projet-de-loi-sren-le-gouvernement-sourd-a-la-realite-dinternet/ #SREN

Projet de loi SREN : le gouvernement sourd à la réalité d'internet Le projet de loi visant à sécuriser et réguler l’espace numérique (aussi appelé « SREN » ou « Espace numérique ») est actuellement en discussion à l'Assemblée nationale, après avoir été voté en juillet dernier au Sénat. Ce texte, présenté comme une simple adaptation d'une série de règlements europée laquadrature.net

@laquadrature - La Quadrature du Net

Le projet de loi est touffu, alors aujourd'hui on vous propose pour l'instant un rapide tour d'horizon. Première mesure phare : forcer les sites porno à vérifier l'âge des internautes. Derrière cela se cache la fin du droit à l'anonymat en ligne. #SREN

@laquadrature - La Quadrature du Net

Et n'allez pas croire que cela serait limité aux sites porno. Le groupe Horizon, allié de la majorité présidentielle, a déjà fait voté cette année une loi qui veut imposer à toute plateforme de vérifier que ses utilisateur·rices sont âgé·es de 15 ans ou plus. #SREN

@laquadrature - La Quadrature du Net

Cette loi Horizon « pour une majorité numérique » et le contrôle de l'âge pour les sites porno que veut ici imposer le gouvernement vont dans le même sens : obliger chaque internaute à justifier de son identité avant de pouvoir s'inscrire sur une plateforme en ligne. #SREN

@laquadrature - La Quadrature du Net

Autre mesure : le bannissement des réseaux sociaux en cas de harcèlement. Ici encore, le gouvernement veut pousser les plateformes à vérifier l'identité de leurs utilisateur·rices, puisqu'elles commettraient un délit en laissant un internaute condamné se refaire un compte. #SREN

@laquadrature - La Quadrature du Net

Ce PJL introduit une nouvelle forme de censure administrative. Après le blocage DNS, le gouvernement veut forcer les navigateurs à bloquer les URL notifiées par la police. @mozilla est évidemment vent debout, et on vous invite à signer leur pétition. https://foundation.mozilla.org/fr/campaigns/sign-our-petition-to-stop-france-from-forcing-browsers-like-mozillas-firefox-to-censor-websites/ #SREN

Signez notre pétition pour empêcher la France d’obliger les navigateurs tels que Firefox de Mozilla à censurer des sites web Le gouvernement français envisage d’adopter une loi qui obligerait les navigateurs web, comme Mozilla Firefox, à bloquer des sites web désignés par le gouvernement. foundation.mozilla.org

@laquadrature - La Quadrature du Net

Enfin, on ne peut que regretter l'absence de mesures concernant l'interopérabilité des réseaux sociaux. Le gouvernement fait la sourde oreille à ce qui est pourtant une manière de réguler les plateformes sans accroître leur hégémonie. #SREN

@laquadrature - La Quadrature du Net

Il y a beaucoup de choses dans ce projet de loi, et rien qui n'aille dans le bon sens. Alors pour nous aider à défendre un internet libre et décentralisé, vous pouvez nous faire un don ! <3 https://www.laquadrature.net/donner #SREN

Faites un don à La Quadrature du Net Nous avons reçu 82,21% des dons dont nous avons besoin pour 2023 ▶ Faire un don _ Parce que le monde numérisé grandit chaque jour en étendue et en complexité, parce que les dispositifs de contrôle et de surveillance entrent chaque année plus loin dans l’intimité de nos vies, soutenez l’associ laquadrature.net
ResilientsTv
Posted - September 18, 2023 at 7:54 AM
Saved - September 20, 2023 at 9:56 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The Pfizer vaccine contains DNA fragments that may integrate into cells' DNA, posing a potential risk of future cancer. PJBuckhaults testified about this before the South Carolina Senate. Independent teams confirmed the contamination, including technology promoters. The production method causing higher contamination levels was not used for clinical trials. The manufacturer minimized the importance of impurities, and the EMA was aware but failed to address the issue. The presence of DNA in the vaccine raises concerns about long-term effects. Alterations in DNA persist and can be passed on to future generations.

@ResilientsTv - Resilients.TV

1/ "Le vaccin Pfizer est contaminé" "Il ne contient pas que de l'ARNm" "Il contient des morceaux d'ADN" "Cet ADN pourrait causer des effets graves" "Il est possible qu'il s'intègre dans l'ADN des cellules" "C'est un risque très réel de cancer futur" @P_J_Buckhaults au @SCSenate

Video Transcript AI Summary
I'm Philippe Boucalt, a cancer genomics researcher at the University of South Carolina. I've sequenced the DNA in the Pfizer vaccine and found that it contains fragments of DNA. This DNA could potentially cause rare but serious side effects, such as cardiac arrest and future cancer risks. The regulatory process that allowed this contamination is concerning. The DNA could integrate into long-lived somatic cells and potentially cause autoimmune attacks or disrupt tumor suppressors. To produce the vaccine, they cloned the PCR product into a plasmid vector, which led to the contamination. We can easily measure the amount of this substance in the vaccine and should conduct further studies to understand its implications. The FDA should require Pfizer to remove the DNA from the vaccine.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Alors un peu de ce que je fais ici, pour ceux qui ne me connaissent pas, je m'appelle Philippe Boucalt. Je suis là pour vous aider. J'ai obtenu un doctorat en biochimie et biologie moléculaire, je suis passionné par l'étude des gènes du cancer. Je suis chercheur angénomic du cancer à l'université de Caroline du Sud, spécialisée dans les modifications du gène humain lié au cancer Et les facteurs de risque, mon expertise concerne les causes et le développement du cancer, d'accord, donc techniquement cela signifie que je très très doué dans l'art du séquençage de l'ADN. Nous sommes doués pour détecter de l'ADN étranger dans des endroits où il devraient pas être même s'ils sont en faible quantité. Et nous avons utilisé ces compétences pendant la pandémie. Nous avons inventé le test Covid que beaucoup ont fait un test de crachat. Grâce à nos tests Covid effectués la nuit, J'ai gagné le respect en Caroline du Sud et dans cette assemblée. Nous avons rassuré les gens en leur disant s'ils étaient infectés ou non. Cela a renforcé notre réputation et a apaisé leurs craintes. Qualification pour commenter, technique et un peu relationnelle en Caroline du Sud, état où j'ai acquis mon expertise. Je vais me concentrer sur un thème très étroit ici, mais cela touche à beaucoup de ces problèmes réglementaires et je vous laisse le soin de les développer si vous le souhaitez. Je vais essayer de rester dans cette voie étroite de certains problèmes du vaccin Pfizer, comme une étude de cas pour les endroits où la surveillance réglementaire pourrait être améliorée. D'accord, le vaccin Pfizer est contaminé, il ne contient pas seulement de l'ARN messager. Il contient des morceaux d'ADN. Cet ADN est le vecteur d'ADN qui a été utilisé comme modèle pour la réaction de transcription in vitro lorsqu'ils ont fabriqué l'ARNm. Je sais que c'est vrai car je l'ai séquencé dans mon propre labo, un de mes collègues était responsable du programme de vaccination à la faculté de pharmacie Et pour des raisons inconnues, il a gardé chaque flacon. Il avait un congélateur rempli de fioles vide, les fioles ont un peu au fond d'elle, Il me les a tous donnés et je les ai regardés. Nous avons eu deux lots distribués et j'ai vérifié ces deux lots par séquençage et j'ai séquencé tout l'ADN du vaccin. Je peux voir ce qu'il y a là-dedans, il est surprenant qu'il y ait de l'ADN là-dedans, Vous pouvez comprendre comment cela s'est produit, et je suis légèrement préoccupé par les conséquences potentielles de cela, à la fois en termes de santé humaine et de biologie. Mais vous devriez être alarmés par le processus réglementaire qui lui a permis d'arriver là. Donc Cet ADN, à mon avis, pourrait causer certains des effets secondaires rares, mais graves, comme la mort par arrêt cardiaque. Il y a maintenant un grand nombre de cas de personnes qui sont décédés de manière suspecte après avoir reçu le vaccin, il est difficile de prouver ce qu'il a causé. Ce n'est que temporairement associé, et cet ADN est un mécanisme plausible. D'accord, il est possible que cet ADN s'intègre dans l'ADN génomique Des cellules qui ont été transpectées avec le mélange de vaccins. Cette intégration est probable et peut se produire. C'est ainsi que ça marche. On le fait au labo souvent. On prend de l'ADN, on le mélange avec un complexe lipidique comme le vaccin Pfizer. Nous le versons sur les cellules, beaucoup pénètrent dans l'ADN, devenant caractéristique permanente de la cellule. Ce n'est pas juste une chose temporaire. C'est dans cette cellule et toute sa descendance à partir de maintenant pour toujours. Ainsi soit-il. C'est pourquoi je suis un peu alarmé par la présence de cet ADN dans le vaccin. Différent de l'ARN car peut-être permanent. Danger pour la modification du génome des cellules somatiques à longue durée de vie comme les cellules souches. Théoriquement, cela pourrait causer une attaque auto-immune soutenue envers ce tissu, basée sur une solide biologie moléculaire, ce qui est une préoccupation raisonnable. C'est aussi un risque théorique très réel de cancer futur chez certaines personnes, Selon où ce morceau d'ADN étranger se trouve dans le génome, il peut interrompre un suppresseur de tumeurs ou activer un oncogène. Je pense que ce sera rare, mais le risque n'est pas nul. L'auto-immunité n'est pas mon domaine. Je ne suis pas immunologiste. Le risque de cancer, C'est mon problème. Je sais que c'est une chose et c'est une possibilité. Un rappel réglementaire ici pour être bien informé. Pour faire la transcription de l'ARN in vitro, vous devez lui donner un modèle d'ADN, d'accord Et vous pouvez lui donner un modèle d'ADN qui est juste un morceau d'ADN synthétique qui contient uniquement les instructions pour fabriquer l'ARN. Et c'est ce qui a été fait pour obtenir l'autorisation d'utilisation d'urgence et l'essai clinique. On l'appelle Process 1. Pour cela, ils ont fabriqué un produit PCR avec les parties souhaitées, puis effectué la transcription in vitro pour obtenir de l'ARN. Il n'y avait pas d'ADN plasmatique pour contaminer la substance utilisée pour l'essai, mais produire ce produit PCR ne permet pas de l'étendre de la manière nécessaire pour vacciner le monde entier. Donc une façon moins chère d'augmenter la production de ce modèle et de cloner ce produit PCR dans ce vecteur. Introduisez le vecteur plasmidi dans les bactéries pour obtenir une grande quantité d'ADN plasmidique. Ensuite, vous utilisez cet ADN plasmidi comme modèle pour conduire la transcription et produire votre ARN. Et c'est à ce moment-là que la contamination a été découverte dans les lots de production, même si elle n'était pas présente dans les produits utilisés pour les essais d'autorisation. Donc je sais que c'est un peu de science nerd, mais cela a des implications réglementaires pour vous les gars. Nous pouvons mesurer assez facilement la quantité de cette substance en laboratoire. Nous sommes doués pour ce genre de choses. C'est la même chose. Nous avons fabriqué un petit PC. Un collègue du MIT travaillait pour le Broad Institute à réaliser un test PCR et nous l'avons cloné ici, similaire au test PCR que vous avez passé pour le test de crachat. D'accord Même idée et expertise derrière. Nous avons la capacité de quantifier avec précision la quantité de cette substance dans un vaccin ou tout autre tissu. Je suis digne qu'il y avait environ deux milliards de copies de la pièce que nous recherchons dans chaque dose administrée. Regardez cette carte que je vous ai montrée, où toutes ces petites pièces que nous cherchons sont là, ce petit morceau, d'accord Mais si vous voyez deux milliards de copies de cela, il y a environ deux cents milliards de toutes les autres choses. Ce que cela signifie, c'est qu'il y a probablement environ deux-cent-milliards de morceaux d'ADN de plasma dans chaque dose du vaccin Et il est encapsulé dans cette nanoparticules lipidique. Donc, il est prêt à être livré à l'intérieur de la cellule. D'accord, C'est une mauvaise idée. Mes conclusions à partir de cela, nous devrions vérifier un grand nombre de personnes. Mes conclusions de cela sont que je devrais apprendre à utiliser PowerPoint. Nous devrions vérifier un groupe de personnes vaccinées en prélevant des échantillons de tissus, en particulier si nous nous concentrons sur les personnes blessées, Mais ce n'est pas nécessaire. Nous pourrions aussi nous concentrer sur des personnes normales et indemnes, et voir si cet ADN plasmatique s'intègre dans les génomes de leurs cellules souches. Ils laissent une carte de visite qui est là, l'une des raisons pour lesquelles je me concentre là-dessus est que C'est un peu différent de beaucoup d'autres préjudices imaginés où vous ne pouvez pas vraiment le prouver. Vous pouvez être méfiant à cause du timing, Mais vous ne pouvez pas le prouver. Vous le prouvez avec sa carte. Vous le trouvez dans les cellules souches des personnes blessées. C'est l'équivalent de trouver un certain type de plomb chez quelqu'un qui est maintenant mort. Il est assez raisonnable de supposer que cela a été la cause de cet événement. Le NOS royal, c'est-à-dire vous tous, devrait insister pour que la FDA exige impérativement que Pfizer Retire l'ADN du rappel et de toutes les futures versions de ce vaccin. Je suis un vrai fan de cette plateforme, d'accord Je pense qu'il a le potentiel de traiter les cancers. Je suis vraiment convaincu que cette plateforme est révolutionnaire. Je crois qu'au cours de votre vie, Des vaccins à ARNm ciblant spécifiquement les antigènes de votre cancer seront développés. Mais ils doivent résoudre ce problème dès maintenant. Je pense que les incidents financiers sont trop importants pour continuer à avancer comme ça, Et il faudra un peu d'encouragement pour s'en sortir.

@ResilientsTv - Resilients.TV

2/ Témoignage de @P_J_Buckhaults devant le Sénat de la Caroline du Sud, ci-dessus un extrait en français autotraduit de qualité acceptable. L'entier de la vidéo en langue originale est ci-dessous: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IEWHhrHiiTY

@ResilientsTv - Resilients.TV

3/ Un peu de contexte pour mieux comprendre l'implication de cette découverte de contaminants ADN dans les vaccins Pfizer (et Moderna): https://x.com/ResilientsTv/status/1672860643366432770?s=20

@ResilientsTv - Resilients.TV

4/ Un autre bon résumé rédigé par @P_J_Buckhaults récemment et publié sur twitter: https://x.com/ResilientsTv/status/1699128858685944121?s=20

@ResilientsTv - Resilients.TV

5/ On rappelle qu'il n'y a aucun doute sur la réalité de cette contamination, vérifiée par plusieurs équipes indépendantes, dont certaines sont des promoteurs de cette technologie: https://x.com/ResilientsTv/status/1697146476793651358?s=20

@ResilientsTv - Resilients.TV

6/ On rappelle que la méthode de production qui entraîne ce niveau de contamination plus élevé n'a pas été utilisée pour les fioles de l'essai clinique, uniquement pour la production de masse. On a injecté un produit différent de celui qui a été approuvé. https://x.com/ResilientsTv/status/1697150305819939220?s=20

@ResilientsTv - Resilients.TV

7/ On rappelle que le fabricant a choisi des méthodes de mesure de ces impuretés qui permettaient d'en minimiser l'importance: https://x.com/ResilientsTv/status/1697151629957509288?s=20

@ResilientsTv - Resilients.TV

8/ On rappelle que l'EMA avait conscience du problème mais n'en a pas pris la mesure: https://x.com/ResilientsTv/status/1697216251095916548?s=20

@ResilientsTv - Resilients.TV

9/ Même si, ce que nous souhaitons tous, les conséquences devaient être moins importantes que les risques potentiels soulevés par @P_J_Buckhaults, en temps normal et avec des médias fonctionnels, ce serait un scandale industriel majeur dont tout le monde parlerait.

@ResilientsTv - Resilients.TV

10/ Il faut aussi noter que le problème n'est pas tant le taux de contaminants ADN, qui est parfois plus haut, parfois plus bas que les plafonds réglementaires dans les échantillons testés, mais l'encapsulation dans des particules nano-lipidiques qui faciliteront son entrée.

@ResilientsTv - Resilients.TV

11/ Malgré plusieurs années passées sur twitter, je ne suis jamais complètement préparé pour faire face à la créativité (et à l'absurdité intégrale) du factchecking amateur. Bravo à notre lauréat du jour: https://x.com/Jean_Poldeux/status/1703715960400540062?s=20

@ResilientsTv - Resilients.TV

12/ Bravo à @HeyGen_Official pour la traduction par IA de l'anglais en français. Attention à quelques erreurs, dont "plasmidic" une ou deux fois traduit en "plasmatique" au lieu de "plasmidique".

@ResilientsTv - Resilients.TV

13/ Excellent résumé de la présentation complète rédigé par la non moins excellente @MaryanneDemasi «Je suis un peu inquiet de la présence de cet ADN dans le vaccin… L'ADN est un dispositif de stockage d'informations à longue durée de vie. C'est ce avec quoi vous êtes né, vous allez mourir et le transmettre à vos enfants. … Donc les altérations de l’ADN… eh bien, elles persistent », a déclaré @P_J_Buckhaults. https://maryannedemasi-substack-com.translate.goog/p/researchers-alarmed-to-find-dna-contamination?r=1gr4xq&_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=fr&_x_tr_hl=en

Researchers “alarmed” to find DNA contamination in Pfizer covid-19 vaccine A researcher testifies before a South Carolina Senate hearing about the discovery of DNA contamination found in Pfizer’s mRNA vaccine maryannedemasi-substack-com.translate.goog
BanounHelene
Posted - September 22, 2023 at 9:06 AM
Saved - September 22, 2023 at 1:45 PM

@BanounHelene - Hélène Banoun

Censure et omerta à tous les niveaux Constaté hier soir lors conférence sur gains de fonction virus et modification du génome des plantes à Marseille :ai abordé le problème des vaccins ARNm = GTP Personne n'a réagit!!

@BAM_PRESS - BAM!

. 🚫 OMERTA AU CNRS ? Consensus scientifique sur les vaccins Covid ? Ou bien peur, pressions, censure ? Que se passe-t-il réellement au CNRS ? Quel rôle joue CLARIVATE dans le contrôle des publications scientifiques ? @SabatierJeanMa1 *, directeur de recherche, a le courage de…

Video Transcript AI Summary
Jean-Marc Sabatier, a research director at CNRS, discusses the lack of scientific debate and censorship surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic. He explains that there is a silence and taboo within the scientific community regarding the adverse effects of vaccines. Despite evidence showing the deleterious effects of current vaccine platforms, there is a favoritism towards the narrative promoted by Big Pharma and those who follow it. Sabatier highlights the explosion of adverse reactions and the increased risk of infection among vaccinated individuals. He attributes the lack of scientific consensus to administrative and political influences within research organizations like CNRS. Despite facing marginalization and potential repercussions, Sabatier remains committed to conducting research based on scientific evidence and protecting public health.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Jean-Marc Sabatier, vous êtes directeur de recherche au CNRS. Au bout de deux ou trois ans, beaucoup de choses ont été publiées sur le Covid, beaucoup de choses ont évolué par rapport à ce qu'on savait il y a deux ou trois ans, notamment parce que vous avez publié, je crois que vous avez publié fait trente-cinq publications l'année dernière, déjà une quinzaine cette année. Vous avez été un pionnier pour comprendre que le Covid affectait le système régno-orgétancine qui a fait beaucoup beaucoup avancer la compréhension du Covid et vous venez de me dire quelque chose qui m'a, qui m'a beaucoup frappé. Je vous ai posé la question, comment vos collègues réagissent-ils Comment on parle au CNRS de tout ce qui se passe depuis trois ans Speaker 1: Sincèrement, ils réagissent pas. Disons que Voilà ils sont très silencieux sur ce qui se passe tout ce qui se concerne le SARS-CoV deux, la Covid, La vaccination anti Covid, il y a une espèce de chape de plomb dessus en travaillant un peu sur le SARS-CoV-deux, les vaccins etc on se sent quand même marginalisé. Voilà c'est un sujet qui dérange notamment quand on s'adresse en fait aux effets secondaires en fait des vaccins des injections vaccinales Ça dérange, ça dérange. Je ne sais pas trop pour quelle raison mais en tout cas on a l'impression que ça dépasse les aspects scientifiques purement, qu'il Il y a une espèce de chape de plomb, c'est vraiment un sujet complètement tabou. Si on parle dans un sens positifs pour ces vaccins c'est disons quand on suit la doxa sur les vaccins là il n'y a pas de problème. Speaker 0: On sait qu'il y a des effets secondaires on regarde les pharmacovigilences en Europe et aux États-Unis, il y a un signal assez inquiétant sur les pharmacovigilences des vaccins. Donc si je comprends bien, il y a une omerta sur ce genre de choses qui sont pourtant défait, c'est de ce que vous dites une omerta sur ça. Speaker 1: Oui, tout à fait vrai. Speaker 0: Par contre, le discours Speaker 1: qui est Speaker 0: celui des et celui des de Big Pharma et de ceux qui ont suivi lui est favorisé c'est bien ça Speaker 1: Oui tout à fait oui. Speaker 0: Mais ça veut dire qu'il n'y a pas de débat scientifique. Speaker 1: Non non il n'y a pas de débat scientifique non. Speaker 0: Mais alors comment ça Speaker 1: Il y a une censure, il y a une censure même, il y a une censure qui est très importante. Speaker 0: Une censure Speaker 1: Une censure oui vraiment dès qu'on veut soulever des problèmes d'effets secondaires même sur des données scientifiques on sent qu'il y a une censure au niveau des publications scientifiques, c'est beaucoup plus difficile de publier quand on a un article qui fait un focus sur des effets délétères des vaccins à ce moment-là ça devient très difficile de publier. Donc il y a vraiment Une omarca complète. Speaker 0: Omerca. Oui. Mais parce que moi ce qui me frappe là c'est que le public est trompé parce que le public on lui dit sur les médias mainstream, dix à longueur de journée, consensus scientifique. Mais vous qui êtes au sein du sein, au coeur du CNRS, comment il y aurait-il un consensus scientifique S'il n'y a pas de débat, c'est fou il n'y a pas de consensus scientifique. Speaker 1: Philippe Robichon Oui il n'y a pas du tout de consensus scientifique ça c'est un consensus scientifique peut-être au niveau des autorités sanitaires mais en tout cas on ne peut pas Appelez ça formellement un consensus scientifique parce qu'il n'existe pas. Je veux dire les plateformes vaccinales actuelles sont délétères celles qui sont basées Sur les ARN messagers elles sont clairement délétères il y a énormément de données qui montrent qu'il y a un problème ces vaccins ne sont pas des vrais vaccins c'est-à-dire qu'ils ne sont pas efficaces, il n'y a pas d'innocuité pour les personnes qui reçoivent ces injections vaccinales. On voit une explosion des effets secondaires Philippe Robichon par odravigilance par vahers donc disons les systèmes qui recensent en fait tout qui font les remontées sur les effets secondaires Philippe Robichon on voit qu'il y a une explosion dans tous les domaines on voit qu'il y a une explosion de maladies auto-immunes, de troubles cardiovasculaires, Philippe Robichon d'inflammation des divers organes, des problèmes menstruels et on sait bien que Ces injections vaccinales vont favoriser l'infection et c'est ce qu'on observe dans la réalité. On voit que lorsqu'on a été injecté On a plus de chances d'être infecté par le SARS-CoV-deux que lorsqu'on n'a pas reçu d'injection vaccinale. Speaker 0: Mais que les autorités sanitaires pour que les gouvernements continue de s'aveugler, pourquoi pas. Mais ce que je ne comprends pas, c'est qu'au CNRS, qui est quand même le le, enfin un des fleurons de la science en France, comment c'est possible que de telles données soient ignorées. Speaker 1: Dans les organismes étatiques de de recherche à la direction de de de ces organismes ce sont des administratifs Souvent des politiques, ce sont moins des scientifiques et puis ils ne doivent pas aller à contre-courant de ce que disent les autorités sanitaires que soit l'OMS ou autre et donc ils suivent un peu le mouvement et je pense que les personnes qui suivent pas le mouvement sont mises à l'écart. Donc peut-être que les scientifiques ont peur de sanctions ou ont peur pour leur carrière. C'est à dire quand on fait des publications scientifiques justement sur les effets délétères des vaccins on a du mal à faire passer ces articles parce que ça plaît pas Philippe Robichon Et les revues même qui publient ce type d'article sont sanctionnées par exemple par Clarivat c'est-à-dire que vraiment ça plaît pas aux autorités sanitaires. Speaker 0: Donc la censure est aussi bien dans les centres de recherche réputés comme au CNRS que dans les rues. Moi Speaker 1: c'est ce que je constate oui tout à fait Speaker 0: Philippe Robichon C'est terrible Philippe Speaker 1: Robichon ça dépasse les aspects scientifiques là on est Clairement en dehors de de de la science. Speaker 0: Alors le public qui dit s'être fait vacciner au nom de la science donc a été trompé. Speaker 1: Moi je dirais oui, oui clairement. Speaker 0: Vous dites que vous êtes marginalisé, est-ce que vous avez aussi subi des pressions Speaker 1: Disons pas directement mais disons qu'on m'a fait savoir que ça ne plaisait pas quoi voilà clairement Ça ne plaît pas. Bon je ne peux pas donner de détails précis mais bon il y en aurait il y en aurait à dire mais effectivement ça ne plaît pas du tout. Speaker 0: Vous subissez les pressions, mais vous ne pouvez pas le dire, je comprends très bien que vous ne pouvez pas donner de détails. Mais est-ce que vous avez quand même la crainte de risquer des sanctions plus lourdes Speaker 1: Quand on dit des choses qui ne plaisent pas, on s'expose quand même au moins des représailles. Mais là je veux dire c'est quand même trop grave là on peut pas laisser faire n'importe quoi. Speaker 0: Et dans cette marginalisation et ce risque de sanctions que vous avez, comment comptez-vous continuer de Speaker 1: travail Moi je veux continuer à faire de la recherche à mon niveau indépendamment de dépression et Bon moi j'ai été recruté au CNRS pour faire de la science pas pour faire de la politique ou pour suivre Les autorités sanitaires si je suis convaincu que ça ne va pas dans le bon sens et là ça ne va clairement pas dans le bon sens. Philippe Robichon Je suis rentré en CNRS en 1989 sur une thématique de vaccins donc j'ai déjà travaillé sur les vaccins, j'ai travaillé en collaboration avec l'institut pasteur de Paris Philippe Robichon Donc je me suis intéressé quand même très tôt au vaccin et puis j'ai regardé effectivement les spécificités des vaccins actuels Et les problèmes ARN messager et les problèmes qu'il pose et puis clairement c'est expérimental je veux dire On ne peut pas dire qu'il y a un consensus scientifique on ne peut pas dire que les données prouvent que ce sont des très bons vaccins, ce n'est pas vrai. Speaker 0: Donc malgré ce vous subissez vous allez continuer. Speaker 1: Oui parce que c'est mon rôle je veux dire c'est quand même trop grave parce que là il est question de la santé de la population donc moi mon travail en travaillant sur les vaccins c'est quand même de faire en sorte que je dise des choses Steve Abdelkarim Réel basé sur les aspects scientifiques et non pas sur des croyances. C'est quand même n'importe quoi ce qui est fait actuellement ça n'a plus rien de scientifique.
JohnBoweActor
Posted - October 10, 2023 at 9:28 PM
Saved - October 11, 2023 at 2:47 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
World Council for Health experts found bacterial DNA and cancer-promoting SV40 sequence in Covid vaccines. These findings were confirmed by independent labs. The DNA could integrate into human genomes, potentially affecting future generations. Undeclared genetic sequences were found in Moderna and Pfizer vaccines, with SV40 only in Pfizer. The vaccines are considered GMO products, requiring additional approval. The risks of these vaccines are unknown, demanding an immediate moratorium. #HealthNews #CovidVaccine

@JohnBoweActor - John Bowe

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE 10 OCT 2023 WORLD COUNCIL FOR HEALTH EXPERT PANEL FINDS CANCER PROMOTING DNA CONTAMINATION IN COVID-19 VACCINES International expert panel concludes that Covid vaccines are contaminated with foreign DNA and that SV40, a cancer-promoting genetic sequence has been found in the vaccines    Bath, U.K. – The World Council for Health, in collaboration with expert advisers, is dedicated to providing the public with accurate and reliable information to promote health and well-being. In light of recent concerns regarding bacterial DNA and genetic sequences in mRNA vaccines, the World Council for Health organized an Urgent Expert Hearing on this critical topic on Monday 9th October.     The hearing took place virtually and addressed the implications of these findings for all people of the world. The following internationally renowned immunologists, geneticists, specialist physicians and research scientists shared their findings with the audience:    •Kevin McKernan (USA)  •Dr Janci Lindsay (USA)  •Prof Sucharit Bhakdi (Germany)  •Assoc Prof Byram Bridle (Canada)  •Dr Peter McCullough (USA)  •Prof Brigitte König (Germany)  •Dr Jessica Rose (Canada)  •Prof Alexandra Henrion-Caude (France)  •Attorney Katie Ashby-Koppens (Australia) shared the legal implications of the deployment of unregulated GMO products as vaccines    Summary of Findings:    1Bacterial DNA (plasmids) has been found in mRNA vaccine vials.   2A cancer-promoting genetic sequence—SV40—has been found in the Covid-19 vaccines. This was not present in the vials used for the approval studies but has been found in all vials of the BioNTech vials disseminated for public use.  3These discoveries have been confirmed in several independent laboratories worldwide.  4The discovery was originally made in April 2023 by Kevin McKernan at which point regulatory bodies were contacted. No official reply has been received.  5Multiple mechanisms exist in which this genetic information might be integrated into the human genome.  6This DNA could instruct our bodies to produce mRNA and foreign proteins for an unknown period with potential implications for subsequent generations.  7There is no constructive purpose identified for the undeclared SV40 promotor sequence, which in addition to its cancer risk, enhances the capacity to incorporate the other foreign genetic material into the recipients’ own chromosomes potentially rendering them (and possibly even their offspring) permanently genetically modified.  8There are multiple completely undeclared genetic sequences in both Moderna and Pfizer vials with the SV40 sequence found only in the Pfizer vials. However, latent SV40 infections in a significant portion of the population could present the same SV40 risk to Moderna recipients.   9Even in the absence of chromosomal integration, the DNA plasmids could generate mRNA for the spike protein toxin and other harmful proteins for prolonged and unpredictable periods of time.  10Integration of foreign DNA into the human genome disrupts existing natural genetic sequences; this carries further risk of disease including cancer.  11The Covid-19 vaccines qualify as GMO (genetically modified organism) products, which require approval in addition to that required for older, more traditional vaccines.  12Informed consent for these products is impossible as the risks of the products have never been formally and transparently assessed by regulators and are not fully known. Independent assessment of the emerging and available evidence is that these products are extremely dangerous with implications for disease, death, transmission and inheritance.  13An immediate moratorium on these novel genetic “vaccines” was demanded by the expert panelists.

nesta_red
Posted - October 13, 2023 at 10:34 AM
Saved - October 31, 2025 at 7:39 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I see posts warning that glyphosate and pesticides poison life and earth, with studies linking exposure to learning and social difficulties. They argue EU approval fails to capture full harm, call for withdrawal, and accuse corporate capture of regulators and science. They cite groundwater contamination, farmer protests, and a push for independent science and bans, framed within fears of control, depopulation, and food system manipulation.

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

#Human-Caused #Poisoning of #Life and #Earth: #Poisoned #Fields - #Glyphosate, the underrated risk? https://tumia.org/en/directory/en/instance.php?tiname=Human-Caused%20Poisoning%20of%20Life%20and%20Earth:%20Poisoned%20Fields%20-%20Glyphosate,%20the%20underrated%20risk?&relationship=All&drsid=0&pisid=0&tiname_dno=1&page=1 The Colossal Mistake of Underestimating the #Death Spreading #Agriculture and #Meat #Industry: tumia.org/en/directory/e…

human-caused poisoning of life and earth: poisoned fields - glyphosate, the underrated risk? @ Tumia - the Objectoriented Internet Directory - Page 1 of 1 human-caused poisoning of life and earth: poisoned fields - glyphosate, the underrated risk? @ Tumia - the Objectoriented Internet Directory - Page 1 of 1 tumia.org

@GMWatch - GMWatch

Two herbicides detected in up to 98% of children—#glyphosate and 2,4-D—may cause learning and social difficulties, study warns https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-12619109/glyphosate-herbicide-24-d-memory-loss-cancer.html

Two herbicides in virtually every US crop may cause learning problems Researchers from the University of California San Diego found that glyphosate was present in 98 percent of the 520 urine samples. The chemical was linked to lower scores in tests. dailymail.co.uk

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

@GMWatch - GMWatch

‼️ In new statement by @ENSSER_org, scientists say the EU pesticide approval system fails to identify the full impact of #glyphosate, to the detriment of people and the environment. ENSSER scientists say the EU must withdraw glyphosate’s authorisation https://ensser.org/publications/2023/glyphosate-eu-pesticide-approval-system-fails-to-identify-full-impact-to-the-detriment-of-people-and-the-environment/

Glyphosate: EU pesticide approval system fails to identify full impact, to the detriment of people and the environment – ENSSER.ORG ensser.org

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

@GMWatch - GMWatch

They don't just own the #seeds & the chemicals but also the folk who should be keeping us safe! Our latest Lobbywatch Review contains striking examples of the corporate capture of lawmakers, regulators, scientific bodies & science reporting—from 🇺🇸🇨🇦🇪🇺🇬🇧🇮🇳 https://gmwatch.org/en/main-menu/news-menu-title/news-reviews/20319

Review 557: Lobbywatch - Corporate Capture Latest news on GMO food, GMO crops, GMO labelling and genetically modified organisms gmwatch.org

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

@GMWatch - GMWatch

News | #Glyphosate is increasingly contaminating groundwater. But the calculation models that pesticide watchdog @EFSA_EU uses to authorize the product do not show this. 'Scientifically unacceptable', say researchers.

@DeGroene - De Groene Amsterdammer

Nieuws | Glyfosaat komt steeds vaker in het grondwater terecht. Maar de rekenmodellen die pesticidenwaakhond EFSA gebruikt bij de toelating van het middel, laten dat niet zien. 'Wetenschappelijk gezien onacceptabel', stellen onderzoekers. https://buff.ly/3FQN21R

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

@EuropePAN - PAN Europe

Belgian and Dutch scientists - including 100+ profs - call on the government in Belgium and the Netherlands to take independent science serious. This means a NO to #glyphosate. https://www.pan-europe.info/blog/almost-300-scientists-100-profs-call-government-belgium-and-netherlands-vote-no-glyphosate#

Almost 300 scientists - 100+ profs - call on the government in Belgium and the Netherlands to vote no to glyphosate The pressure to vote NO to glyphosate on EU governments is increasing. After clear calls by civil society, 2,5 million signatures and a very clear IPSOS opinion poll scientists put their weight behind the call. In a letter 291 scientists - including 104 professors - from Belgium and the Netherlands ask their ministers to take independent science seriously. This is very pan-europe.info

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

High "efficiency"not=low carbon. https://tumia.org/en/directory/en/instance.php?tiname=The%20Colossal%20Mistake%20of%20Underestimating%20the%20Death%20Spreading%20Agriculture%20and%20Meat%20Industry

the colossal mistake of underestimating the death spreading agriculture and meat industry @ Tumia - the Objectoriented Internet Directory - Page 0 of 0 the colossal mistake of underestimating the death spreading agriculture and meat industry @ Tumia - the Objectoriented Internet Directory - Page 0 of 0 tumia.org

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

@vdvehi @dancalegria @JeroenPols Dat de volgende soort landbouw 6 keer minder CO2 uitstoot zou geven dan bv. een permacultuurtuin of -bos is een flagrante leugen: #Poisoned #Fields - #Glyphosate: https://tumia.org/en/directory/en/instance.php?tiname=Human-Caused%20Poisoning%20of%20Life%20and%20Earth:%20Poisoned%20Fields%20-%20Glyphosate,%20the%20underrated%20risk?&relationship=All&drsid=0&pisid=0&tiname_dno=1&page=1

human-caused poisoning of life and earth: poisoned fields - glyphosate, the underrated risk? @ Tumia - the Objectoriented Internet Directory - Page 1 of 1 human-caused poisoning of life and earth: poisoned fields - glyphosate, the underrated risk? @ Tumia - the Objectoriented Internet Directory - Page 1 of 1 tumia.org

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

#Human-Caused #Poisoning of #Life and #Earth: #Poisoned #Fields - #Glyphosate, the underrated risk? https://tumia.org/en/directory/en/instance.php?tiname=Human-Caused%20Poisoning%20of%20Life%20and%20Earth:%20Poisoned%20Fields%20-%20Glyphosate,%20the%20underrated%20risk?&relationship=All&drsid=0&pisid=0&tiname_dno=1&page=1 The Colossal Mistake of Underestimating the #Death Spreading #Agriculture and #Meat #Industry: tumia.org/en/directory/e…

human-caused poisoning of life and earth: poisoned fields - glyphosate, the underrated risk? @ Tumia - the Objectoriented Internet Directory - Page 1 of 1 human-caused poisoning of life and earth: poisoned fields - glyphosate, the underrated risk? @ Tumia - the Objectoriented Internet Directory - Page 1 of 1 tumia.org

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

#Human-Caused #Poisoning of #Life and #Earth: #Poisoned #Fields - #Glyphosate, the underrated risk? https://tumia.org/en/directory/en/instance.php?tiname=Human-Caused%20Poisoning%20of%20Life%20and%20Earth:%20Poisoned%20Fields%20-%20Glyphosate,%20the%20underrated%20risk?&relationship=All&drsid=0&pisid=0&tiname_dno=1&page=1 The Colossal Mistake of Underestimating the #Death Spreading #Agriculture and #Meat #Industry: tumia.org/en/directory/e…

human-caused poisoning of life and earth: poisoned fields - glyphosate, the underrated risk? @ Tumia - the Objectoriented Internet Directory - Page 1 of 1 human-caused poisoning of life and earth: poisoned fields - glyphosate, the underrated risk? @ Tumia - the Objectoriented Internet Directory - Page 1 of 1 tumia.org

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

@CarineKnapen Dit geldt natuurlijk enkel voor graskoeien. Het meeste vlees, denk ik, komt van megastallen (vleesfabrieken) en hun veevoeder van een zeer schadelijke pesticiden, chemische gmo monocultuur landbouw die wel verantwoordelijk is veel broeikasgassen uitstoot: tumia.org/en/directory/e…

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

@CarineKnapen 2. De oplossing is natuurlijk niet minder boeren, maar juist meer boeren die terug aan natuurlijke (permacultuur) landbouw (zoals die graskoeien) doen. Onze wef-who-vn-overheid doet echter net het tegengestelde met het oog op depopulatie en massacontrole.

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

@CarineKnapen Dit geldt natuurlijk enkel voor graskoeien. Het meeste vlees, denk ik, komt van megastallen (vleesfabrieken) en hun veevoeder van een zeer schadelijke pesticiden, chemische gmo monocultuur landbouw die wel verantwoordelijk is veel broeikasgassen uitstoot: tumia.org/en/directory/e…

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

@CarineKnapen Dit geldt natuurlijk enkel voor graskoeien. Het meeste vlees, denk ik, komt van megastallen (vleesfabrieken) en hun veevoeder van een zeer schadelijke pesticiden, chemische gmo monocultuur landbouw die wel verantwoordelijk is veel broeikasgassen uitstoot: tumia.org/en/directory/e…

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

@Royaal09794441 - Roy

"Waarom koopt Bill Gates een kwart miljoen hectare landbouwgrond op in de Verenigde Staten?" Omdat als je de bevolking wilt controleren, de beste manier is om de voedselvoorziening te controleren en hij wil sowieso dat jullie nepvlees en insecten eten. WEF FOODHUBS, PRINTED BEEF

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker discusses Bill Gates and his acquisitions in U.S. farmland, stating he owns about 242,000 acres of farmland in The United States, which is described as a lot. The claim is made that during COVID, China bought up about the same amount of farmland in The United States, and the purpose attributed to these acquisitions is to control the food supply. The speaker notes Gates as also one of the biggest investors in fake meat products that are entering storefronts, and mentions the existence of fake meat commodities being introduced into supermarkets. The speaker asserts that this is a distraction. They further claim to examine fake protein and how it’s being inserted in most products, stating that the aim is to take animal protein out of the consumption model and turn it into something grown and produced in the labs.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We all like to talk on Bill Gates. Why is he buying up all the farmland in The United States? He was about 242,000 acres of farmland in The United States, and that's a lot of farmland. During COVID, China bought up about the same amount of farmland in The United States. It's to control the food supply. If you're buying up the best farmland in the world in the middle of America and some of the best soil in America. What are the intentions? Now Bill Gates is also one of the biggest investors in fake meat products that are coming to the storefronts. You have all the fake meat commodities that are being introduced into the supermarkets. I believe that's a distraction. Well, let's look at fake protein and how they're inserting it in most of our products as well. They're trying to take animal protein out of our consumption model, turn it into something that's grown and produced in the labs.

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

@USAWatchdog - Greg Hunter

Nobody Gets Out Alive from Climate Engineering Disaster – Dane Wigington "On the current course, nobody gets out alive, and that includes those who think they are going to go underground and ride this out." https://usawatchdog.com/nobody-gets-out-alive-from-climate-engineering-disaster-dane-wigington/

Nobody Gets Out Alive from Climate Engineering Disaster – Dane Wigington | Greg Hunter’s USAWatchdog By Greg Hunter’s USAWatchdog.com (Saturday Night Post) Climate engineering researcher Dane Wigington says huge lies are being told daily to cover up the speed in which the climate is imploding on a global scale. Sure, there have been all sorts of ways harm has been done to the environment, but Wigington contends the biggest single usawatchdog.com

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

@gringuitalatina - 🌴🌺 𝓜𝓸𝓷𝓲𝓬𝓪 🌺🌴

Waarom de boeren woedend zijn.. Spanje importeert bonen uit Marokko met residuen van pesticiden 3x hoger dan toegestaan in EU.

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

@theholisticnick - Nick | Gut Health

There’s a poison that’s silently contaminating our soil, food & water. It’s destroying our gut microbiomes, hormones & is also linked to chronic diseases like cancer. It’s called glyphosate. Here’s what you can do to protect your health. THREAD

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

Teach your children to cook, prepare, grow, find and recognize natural food. Why are these important skills not part of primary and secondary education? Exactly, the parasitic system wants your children dependent on + controlled by their industry+GMO food.

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

#Human-Caused #Poisoning of #Life and #Earth: #Poisoned #Fields - #Glyphosate, the underrated risk? https://tumia.org/en/directory/en/instance.php?tiname=Human-Caused%20Poisoning%20of%20Life%20and%20Earth:%20Poisoned%20Fields%20-%20Glyphosate,%20the%20underrated%20risk?&relationship=All&drsid=0&pisid=0&tiname_dno=1&page=1 The Colossal Mistake of Underestimating the #Death Spreading #Agriculture and #Meat #Industry: tumia.org/en/directory/e…

human-caused poisoning of life and earth: poisoned fields - glyphosate, the underrated risk? @ Tumia - the Objectoriented Internet Directory - Page 1 of 1 human-caused poisoning of life and earth: poisoned fields - glyphosate, the underrated risk? @ Tumia - the Objectoriented Internet Directory - Page 1 of 1 tumia.org

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

#Human-Caused #Poisoning of #Life and #Earth: #Poisoned #Fields - #Glyphosate, the underrated risk? https://tumia.org/en/directory/en/instance.php?tiname=Human-Caused%20Poisoning%20of%20Life%20and%20Earth:%20Poisoned%20Fields%20-%20Glyphosate,%20the%20underrated%20risk?&relationship=All&drsid=0&pisid=0&tiname_dno=1&page=1 The Colossal Mistake of Underestimating the #Death Spreading #Agriculture and #Meat #Industry: tumia.org/en/directory/e…

human-caused poisoning of life and earth: poisoned fields - glyphosate, the underrated risk? @ Tumia - the Objectoriented Internet Directory - Page 1 of 1 human-caused poisoning of life and earth: poisoned fields - glyphosate, the underrated risk? @ Tumia - the Objectoriented Internet Directory - Page 1 of 1 tumia.org

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

@Rodriramosdb De WHO-VN-WEF... elites zijn tot op heden verantwoordelijk voor het giftige en gebrekkige voedselsysteem en gaan het enkel nog giftiger (niet beter - dat is een flagrante leugen) maken voor de gewone mens.

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

#Human-Caused #Poisoning of #Life and #Earth: #Poisoned #Fields - #Glyphosate, the underrated risk? https://tumia.org/en/directory/en/instance.php?tiname=Human-Caused%20Poisoning%20of%20Life%20and%20Earth:%20Poisoned%20Fields%20-%20Glyphosate,%20the%20underrated%20risk?&relationship=All&drsid=0&pisid=0&tiname_dno=1&page=1 The Colossal Mistake of Underestimating the #Death Spreading #Agriculture and #Meat #Industry: tumia.org/en/directory/e…

human-caused poisoning of life and earth: poisoned fields - glyphosate, the underrated risk? @ Tumia - the Objectoriented Internet Directory - Page 1 of 1 human-caused poisoning of life and earth: poisoned fields - glyphosate, the underrated risk? @ Tumia - the Objectoriented Internet Directory - Page 1 of 1 tumia.org

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

#Human-Caused #Poisoning of #Life and #Earth: #Poisoned #Fields - #Glyphosate, the underrated risk? https://tumia.org/en/directory/en/instance.php?tiname=Human-Caused%20Poisoning%20of%20Life%20and%20Earth:%20Poisoned%20Fields%20-%20Glyphosate,%20the%20underrated%20risk?&relationship=All&drsid=0&pisid=0&tiname_dno=1&page=1 The Colossal Mistake of Underestimating the #Death Spreading #Agriculture and #Meat #Industry: tumia.org/en/directory/e…

human-caused poisoning of life and earth: poisoned fields - glyphosate, the underrated risk? @ Tumia - the Objectoriented Internet Directory - Page 1 of 1 human-caused poisoning of life and earth: poisoned fields - glyphosate, the underrated risk? @ Tumia - the Objectoriented Internet Directory - Page 1 of 1 tumia.org

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

I"ll be avoiding produce from Spain since seeing the ad in screenshot! Human-Caused #Poisoning of Life and Earth: #Poisoned #Fields - #Glyphosate, the underrated risk? https://tumia.org/en/directory/en/instance.php?tiname=Human-Caused%20Poisoning%20of%20Life%20and%20Earth:%20Poisoned%20Fields%20-%20Glyphosate,%20the%20underrated%20risk?&relationship=All&drsid=0&pisid=0&tiname_dno=1&page=1 The #Death Spreading #Agriculture and #Meat #Industry: tumia.org/en/directory/e…

human-caused poisoning of life and earth: poisoned fields - glyphosate, the underrated risk? @ Tumia - the Objectoriented Internet Directory - Page 1 of 1 human-caused poisoning of life and earth: poisoned fields - glyphosate, the underrated risk? @ Tumia - the Objectoriented Internet Directory - Page 1 of 1 tumia.org

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

@ChrisTCJansen - Chris Jansen 

Glyfosaat keuren ze goed, maar vitaminen en minralen gaan ze verbieden. En er zijn echt mensen die denken dat "ze" het beste met ons voor hebben... https://vitamine.shop/blog/worden-vitaminen-in-europa-aan-banden-gelegd/

Worden vitaminen in Europa aan banden gelegd? - FreeChoice De Europese Commissie is van plan om dit jaar maximaal toegestane hoeveelheden vitaminen vast te leggen voor alle Europeanen. vitamine.shop

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

THE SECRETIVE GLOBALIST CORPORATION, THEIR CORPORATE LACKEYS AND THEIR GREAT FAMINE -- FOR YOU! YES!! YOU! https://rumble.com/v4z2vsx-the-secretive-globalist-corporation-their-corporate-lackeys-and-their-great.html

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

@EtienneJansen - Etienne Jansen

@georgevanhouts Er wordt al een tijdje minutie in Oekraine gebruikt waarin verarmd Uranium is verwerkt. Dat is destijds in het voormalige Joegoslavie ook gebruikt. En dat is nu een land waar kanker veelvuldig voorkomt...

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

@FrankPeeters4 De natuur moet inderdaad niet hersteld worden, dat doet ze zelf wel. Het parasitaire systeem moet wel stoppen met natuur vernietigen. Dat is vanzelfsprekend niet de bedoeling van de natuur"herstel"wet, in tegendeel:

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

@CarineKnapen 2. De oplossing is natuurlijk niet minder boeren, maar juist meer boeren die terug aan natuurlijke (permacultuur) landbouw (zoals die graskoeien) doen. Onze wef-who-vn-overheid doet echter net het tegengestelde met het oog op depopulatie en massacontrole.

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

@CarineKnapen 2. De oplossing is natuurlijk niet minder boeren, maar juist meer boeren die terug aan natuurlijke (permacultuur) landbouw (zoals die graskoeien) doen. Onze wef-who-vn-overheid doet echter net het tegengestelde met het oog op depopulatie en massacontrole.

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

@CarineKnapen - Carine Knapen

De toekomst van de landbouw. Er komt vrijwel geen mens noch tractor meer aan te pas. 👇👇👇 Er bestaan overigens ook al efficiënte fruitpluk robots die massaal worden ingezet. De investering loont de moeite. Eén maal investeren voor jarenlang gebruik zonder hoge arbeidsinspanningen en - kosten. Hoeveel arbeidsplaatsen zullen er verdwijnen ?

Video Transcript AI Summary
Hybrid drones combine features of both types, offering versatility in use. In agriculture, using drones brings many advantages: they can monitor crop health, survey land, and manage irrigation. Drones equipped with sensors provide detailed data on soil and plant conditions, and this information helps farmers make informed decisions. The technical specifications of agricultural drones are impressive. They can carry significant weights of fertilizers and pesticides, usually ranging from 10 to 20 kilograms. Advanced drones are equipped with GPS and mapping capabilities, ensuring precise operations. Steps for using drones in agriculture include planning the flight path and loading the necessary materials. Farmers need to ensure the drone's battery is charged and perform a pre-flight check. During the flight, the drone's progress can be monitored in real time.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hybrid drones combine features of both types, offering versatility in use. Using drones in agriculture has many advantages. They can monitor crop health, survey land, and manage irrigation. Drones equipped with sensors provide detailed data on soil and plant conditions. Information helps farmers make informed decisions. Technical specifications of agricultural drones are impressive. They can carry significant weights of fertilizers fertilizers and pesticides, usually ranging from 10 to 20 kilograms. Advanced drones have GPS and mapping capabilities, ensuring precise operations. Steps for using drones in agriculture include planning the flight path and loading the necessary materials. Farmers need to ensure the drone's battery is charged and perform a pre flight check. During the flight, the drone's progress can be monitored in real time.

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

Brute Force Agent Orange https://rumble.com/v6rjse1-standalone-pset-4.s.17-connect-4in4-moves-pattern-recognition-deduction-hi-.html?start=220 Human-Caused Poisoning of Life and Earth. See parent tweet and its replies.

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

Human-Caused Poisoning of Life and Earth. See parent tweet and its replies.

@AHarVesco - NIBS

@ThrillaRilla369

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker argues that money is made from sick people, not healthy people, and that heart medicine, dandelions, and Roundup fit together. They claim the little yellow dandelions that people are told to hate are actually the greatest thing on earth for the heart, with enzymes and electrolytes that can cleanse and strengthen heart valves and muscles more than anything else, natural and free. They add that the same company that owns the heart medicine—the highest sold heart medicine in the world that makes hundreds of millions of dollars a year—also owns Roundup.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: They can only make money off of sick people, not healthy people. Heart medicine, dandelions, and Roundup. That sounds crazy. Right? But you know what? They all fit together like a puzzle. You know why? Those little yellow dandelions that grow in your yard that they tell you to hate, they're terrible. They're actually the greatest thing on the earth for your heart. The enzymes and the electrolytes can literally cleanse and strengthen your heart valves and muscles more than anything else, and it's natural and free. The crazy thing is the same company that owns the heart medicine that is the highest sold heart medicine in the entire world that makes hundreds of millions of dollars a year is the same exact company that owns Roundup.

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

@EtienneJansen @georgevanhouts Volgens de screenshot komt dit lijnzaad uit Kazachstan. Echter op de potjes in de winkel van mijn dorp staat Oekraïne. Beste Colruyt, deze potjes koop ik onder geen beding.

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

Human-Caused Poisoning of Life and Earth. See parent tweet and its replies.

@Child0fSource - Me&G0d

@robinmonotti he did that a long time ago with Glyphosate

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

Human-Caused Poisoning of Life and Earth. See parent tweet and its replies.

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

Groundbreaking Alzheimer's Cure...Harvard Scientists Release 10 Year Research. Lithium Deficiency Triggers Alzheimer's Disease & A Simple Lithium Compound Reverses The Disease. Glyphosate Has Chelated & Stripped Our Soil Of Lithium, Resulting In Widespread Mineral Deficiency. According to Harvard Scientists, This Missing Nutrient Is the Key to Stopping Alzheimer’s. Harvard researchers report that the brain naturally contains lithium & that its early loss sparks the cascade that becomes Alzheimer’s. In human tissue, lithium levels drop at the earliest stages & a brain-available, amyloid-evading lithium compound restored memory & reversed pathology. Lithium protects against neurodegeneration & supports the normal functioning of all major brain cells. The team discovered that loss of lithium in the human brain is among the earliest alterations linked to Alzheimer’s. In follow-up experiments, they showed that a new lithium compound resistant to amyloid capture restored memory. The researchers found that a lithium-restricted diet brought brain lithium levels down & Alzheimer’s disease symptoms ensued. This accelerated the aging process, giving rise to brain inflammation, loss of synaptic connections between neurons & cognitive decline. Replenishing lithium with the compound Lithium Orotate reversed the disease-related damage & restored memory function, even in advanced disease. Notably, maintaining stable lithium levels in early life prevented Alzheimer’s onset — a finding that confirmed that lithium fuels the disease process. Today's Foods Are Depleted Of Major & Trace Minerals Because Of Glyphosate, Which Is A Toxic Chelator That Was Never Meant To Come In Contact With Our Food Supply. It Was Originally Used To Strip Minerals From Pipes. Glyphosate was initially used as a descaling agent to clean out calcium & other mineral deposits in pipes & boilers of residential & commercial hot water systems. Multiple scientific studies have concluded that soil depletion has lowered lithium to undetectable levels, which in turn causes all plants to have little to no lithium as they always historically had prior to Glyphosate. Glyphosate binds to lithium in soil. The herbicide is a strong chelator that forms coordination complexes with various metal ions, including lithium. 👇Lithium Deficiency & Alzheimer's Disease Onset👇 https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-025-09335-x 👇Lithium Is A Mental Health Micronutrient👇 https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6443601/ 👇Glyphosate Chelates Minerals From Soil & Food👇 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0031405612000911 Speaker: @extremehealthradio2 Justin Stellman

Video Transcript AI Summary
Harvard University reports in Nature magazine (August 2025) on a new ten-year study of human brain tissue examining the impact of lithium and its restriction on blood and brain issues in mice and humans. The study tested trace minerals in blood and brain samples across healthy individuals and those diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease, with some subjects supplemented with lithium compounds like lithium orotate to see whether they reversed the pathology of Alzheimer's. Postmortem brain tissue and blood samples from thousands of donors at different stages of cognitive decline were analyzed. Key findings highlighted include: lithium deficiency is one of the earliest changes linked to Alzheimer's; lithium depletion caused amyloid plaque buildup, tau tangles, brain inflammation, neuron loss, myelin loss, and memory decline in mice. In contrast, lithium orotate evaded amyloid binding, reversed Alzheimer's pathology, restored memory, and worked at one one thousandth of the clinical dose. The report states that lithium compounds like lithium orotate reverse brain damage and memory loss in mice. The study’s results are described as tying into the work of Dr. Dale Bredesen’s work, The End of Alzheimer's.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Think we might have a cure for Alzheimer's. This is out of Harvard University. I'm not saying this. Right? I'm just reporting on what Harvard reported in Nature magazine. Brand new study, August 2025, guys. This was a ten year study of research of human brain tissue. And what they wanted to find out was whether or not the mineral lithium and the restriction of that had an impact on different blood and brain issues in mice and in people as well. And they tested the trace minerals in blood and brain samples across healthy people and those that were diagnosed with Alzheimer's. And some of them were supplemented with lithium compounds like lithium orotate to see whether or not it reversed the pathology of Alzheimer's. And they checked the postmortem brain tissue and blood samples from thousands of donors at different stages of cognitive decline. And what did they find? They found out that lithium deficiency is one of the earliest changes linked to Alzheimer's, and lithium depletion caused, check this out, amyloid plaque buildup, tau tangles, brain inflammation, neuron loss, myelin loss, and memory decline in mice. And lithium orotate evaded amyloid binding, reversed Alzheimer's pathology, restored memory, and worked at one one thousandth of the clinical dose. It says here lithium compounds like lithium orate reverse brain damage and memory loss in mice. Guys, this really ties into the work of doctor Dale Bredesen's work, the end of Alzheimer's.
Lithium deficiency and the onset of Alzheimer’s disease - Nature The earliest molecular changes in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) are poorly understood1–5. Here we show that endogenous lithium (Li) is dynamically regulated in the brain and contributes to cognitive preservation during ageing. Of the metals we analysed, Li was the only one that was significantly reduced in the brain in individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), a precursor to AD. Li bioavailability was further reduced in AD by amyloid sequestration. We explored the role of endogenous Li in the brain by depleting it from the diet of wild-type and AD mouse models. Reducing endogenous cortical Li by approximately 50% markedly increased the deposition of amyloid-β and the accumulation of phospho-tau, and led to pro-inflammatory microglial activation, the loss of synapses, axons and myelin, and accelerated cognitive decline. These effects were mediated, at least in part, through activation of the kinase GSK3β. Single-nucleus RNA-seq showed that Li deficiency gives rise to transcriptome changes in multiple brain cell types that overlap with transcriptome changes in AD. Replacement therapy with lithium orotate, which is a Li salt with reduced amyloid binding, prevents pathological changes and memory loss in AD mouse models and ageing wild-type mice. These findings reveal physiological effects of endogenous Li in the brain and indicate that disruption of Li homeostasis may be an early event in the pathogenesis of AD. Li replacement with amyloid-evading salts is a potential approach to the prevention and treatment of AD. Lithium has an essential role in the brain and is deficient early in Alzheimer’s disease, which can be recapitulated in mice and treated with a novel lithium salt that restores the physiological level. nature.com
Is Lithium a Micronutrient? From Biological Activity and Epidemiological Observation to Food Fortification Lithium compounds have been widely used in psychopharmacology, particularly in the treatment of bipolar disorder. Their normothymic and neuroprotective properties when used at high doses have been well established. However, a number of observations ... pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
The effect of glyphosate on soil microbial activity, microbial community structure, and soil potassium The herbicide, glyphosate [N-(phosphonomethyl) glycine] is extensively used worldwide. Long-term use of glyphosate can cause micronutrient deficiency … sciencedirect.com

@nesta_red - Nesta Red

@TruthArchiveAI save thread

jgalt485
Posted - October 26, 2023 at 5:08 PM
Saved - October 26, 2023 at 6:16 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Scientists are urging the World Health Organization (WHO) to declare climate and nature crises as a global health emergency. Over 200 scientific journals support this call, stating that both crises are harmful to human health and should not be treated separately. Climate change contributes to the spread of infectious diseases, pollution affects clean water sources, and biodiversity loss hinders food security. Such a declaration would require member states to exchange information to address the issues. Critics argue that it could lead to mandatory lockdowns and restrictions on climate skepticism. The fight against "disinformation" is a priority for the WHO, as stated by its director-general. The aim is to rebuild trust between people, governments, and institutions. However, some view this as a threat to freedom of expression. The issue of combating misinformation is also emphasized by YGL Ardern, who advocates for collective action to control speech for the sake of societal stability. She believes that emerging technologies like AI offer governments significant opportunities. This push for censorship aligns with the agendas of various global organizations and governments.

@jgalt485 - John Galt ⓩ 🇫🇷 cpt secours JohnGalt1 🇳🇱

1. Et voilà, ça commence ... Les "scientifiques" climatoscientistes (probablement ceux stipendiés par le GIEC, l'UE et l'ONU ) ont demandé à l'OMS que celle-ci déclare "les crises du climat et de la nature" comme étant une "urgence sanitaire"

@jgalt485 - John Galt ⓩ 🇫🇷 cpt secours JohnGalt1 🇳🇱

2. Dans le même temps, plus de 200 revues scientifiques ont publié un appel en ce sens avant la prochaine Assemblée mondiale de la Santé au printemps 2024. Cet appel affirme que la crise climatique et la perte de biodiversité sont toutes deux nocives

@jgalt485 - John Galt ⓩ 🇫🇷 cpt secours JohnGalt1 🇳🇱

3. pour la santé humaine et ne doivent pas être considérées séparément. 🤮🤮🤬 Le changement climatique, par exemple, contribue à la propagation de maladies contagieuses. La pollution nuit aux sources d’eau potable, et le déclin de la biodiversité rend plus difficile de nourrir

@jgalt485 - John Galt ⓩ 🇫🇷 cpt secours JohnGalt1 🇳🇱

4. sainement l’humanité. La déclaration d’une urgence sanitaire est le niveau d’alerte le plus élevé que l’OMS puisse imposer. Tous les États membres seront alors tenus d’échanger des informations afin de maîtriser le problème en question.

@jgalt485 - John Galt ⓩ 🇫🇷 cpt secours JohnGalt1 🇳🇱

6. La dernière fois que cela s’est produit, c’était pendant la pandémie de Corona. Ce message a été diffusé le 26.10.2023 sur Deutschlandfunk. https://www.deutschlandfunk.de/wissenschaftler-wollen-dass-who-klima-und-naturkrise-zum-gesundheitsnotstand-erklaert-100.html

Gemeinsamer Aufruf - Wissenschaftler wollen, dass WHO Klima- und Naturkrise zum Gesundheitsnotstand erklärt Wissenschaftlerinnen und Wissenschaftler haben die Weltgesundheitsorganisation aufgefordert, die Klima- und die Naturkrise zum Gesundheitsnotstand zu erklären. deutschlandfunk.de

@jgalt485 - John Galt ⓩ 🇫🇷 cpt secours JohnGalt1 🇳🇱

6. Ce qui autoriserait confinements obligatoires, interdiction de douter du climatoscientisme, au nom de la "lutte contre la désinformation" ... "indispensable à la sauvegarde des valeurs démocratiques" ... Monde orwellien, liberticide et dystopique !!

@jgalt485 - John Galt ⓩ 🇫🇷 cpt secours JohnGalt1 🇳🇱

7. La lutte contre la "désinformation" est d'ailleurs le but premier de l'OMS, comme vient de l'annoncer le patron de l'OMS. Les Etats doivent ratifier le nouveau traité pandémie (et le règlement sanitaire international modifié), 🤮🤮🤬

@jgalt485 - John Galt ⓩ 🇫🇷 cpt secours JohnGalt1 🇳🇱

8. car "la désinformation a érodé la confiance entre les peuples, les gouvernements et les institutions."🤣🤣🤣

Video Transcript AI Summary
The UN General Assembly adopted a declaration on pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response, emphasizing the need for a collective approach. The COVID-19 pandemic has caused immense damage, affecting lives, economies, and societies. It has exposed political divisions and worsened inequalities, hitting the most vulnerable communities the hardest. It is not a matter of if, but when the next pandemic will occur. To address this, WHO member states are negotiating a new pandemic accord and amendments to international health regulations. However, it is crucial to go beyond negotiations and ensure national ratification and accountable implementation. We must break the cycle of panic and neglect to protect future generations. Together, we are stronger.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Last month, the UN General Assembly adopted a political declaration on pandemic prevention, preparedness and response, underscoring their commitment to meet shared threats with a shared response. The COVID nineteen pandemic appended lives and livelihoods disrupting societies and economies and exposed and exacerbated political fault lines within and between nations. It eroded trust between people, governments and institutions fueled by a torrent of mis and disinformation, and it laid bare the searing inequalities of our world with the poorest and most vulnerable communities the hardest hit. The next pandemic is not a question of if, but of when. And we cannot afford to repeat the same mistake of the past. That's why WHO member states are negotiating a new pandemic accord and amendments to the international health regulations to strengthen the legal framework for the global response to pandemics, and we can't stop there. We must follow through with national ratification and accountable implementation. For the sake of future generations, we must not go back to the old cycle of panic and neglect that left our world vulnerable. We are stronger together.

@jgalt485 - John Galt ⓩ 🇫🇷 cpt secours JohnGalt1 🇳🇱

9. Un tel discours correspond à celui exposé à 'ONU par la YGL Ardern. Celle-ci milite pour la fin le liberté d'expression, qui "sème le chaos". "Nous en avons les moyens, il faut juste une volonté collective", soutient l'ex-Premier ministre néo-zélandais.

@jgalt485 - John Galt ⓩ 🇫🇷 cpt secours JohnGalt1 🇳🇱

10. Evoquant la menace de la "désinformation" - qui en novlangue signifie tout ce qui s'écarte un tant soit peu de la doxa mondialiste, la YGL met en garde les élites dirigeantes: le problème ne saurait être ignoré. Pour Jacinda Ardern, ne pas combattre la liberté

@jgalt485 - John Galt ⓩ 🇫🇷 cpt secours JohnGalt1 🇳🇱

11. d'expression représenterait... une menace à la liberté d'expression. Consciente que son combat "pourrait être mal interprété comme étant hostile aux valeurs qui nous sont si chères", l'ex-prêtresse du covidisme use d'un argument plus révélateur qu'elle n'imagine,

@jgalt485 - John Galt ⓩ 🇫🇷 cpt secours JohnGalt1 🇳🇱

12. expliquant que sortir du carcan de la propagande occidentale ferait "s'effondrer la force collective des pays".

Video Transcript AI Summary
As leaders, we must address the challenge of disinformation without compromising free speech. Ignoring this issue threatens the values we hold dear. It's difficult to end a war if people believe it's legal and noble. Similarly, addressing climate change becomes challenging if people deny its existence. Upholding human rights is hindered by hateful rhetoric and dangerous ideologies. We face battles on multiple fronts, but there is hope. For every new weapon, there is a tool to overcome it. Despite attempts to create chaos, there is a collective determination to restore order. We have the means, we just need the collective will.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: As leaders, we're rightly concerned that even the most light touch approaches to disinformation could be misinterpreted as being hostile to the values of free speech that we value so highly. But while I cannot tell you today what the answer is to this challenge, I can say with complete certainty that we cannot ignore it. To do so poses an equal threat to the norms we all value. After all, how do you successfully end a war if people are led to believe the reason for its existence is not only legal, but noble? How do you tackle climate change if people do not believe it exists? How do you ensure the human rights of others are upheld when they are subjected to hateful and dangerous rhetoric and ideology? The weapons may be different, selves, to disband communities, to collapse the collective strength of countries who work together. We we are facing many battles on many fronts. But there is cause for optimism because for every new weapon we face, there is a new tool to overcome it. For every attempt to push the world into chaos is a collective conviction to bring us back to order. We have the means. We just need the collective will.

@jgalt485 - John Galt ⓩ 🇫🇷 cpt secours JohnGalt1 🇳🇱

14. La tyranne Jacinda Ardern a été nommée à un nouveau poste de censure à l'université de Harvard... Son rôle consistera à utiliser des algorithmes d'IA pour faire du gouvernement "la seule source de vérité"... Jacinda Ardern affirme que

@jgalt485 - John Galt ⓩ 🇫🇷 cpt secours JohnGalt1 🇳🇱

15. "les technologies émergentes telles que l'IA offrent d'énormes possibilités aux gouvernements". https://t.me/jqhnspartan/69046

Video Transcript AI Summary
New Zealand is facing a global issue, and there are many rumors circulating on social media. The speaker acknowledges seeing these rumors but cannot individually dismiss all of them. Instead, they want to assure the public that they will provide daily updates with the most current information. They encourage the public to trust them as a reliable source, as well as the director general of health and the ministry of health. They invite people to visit their website for clarification anytime.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: New Zealand state in the midst of what is a global issue, as you would expect, there are a number of rumors that circulate. I am present on social media. I see it myself. I cannot go around and individually dismiss every single rumor I see on social media as tinted as I might be. So instead, I want to send a clear message to the New Zealand public. We will share with you the most up to date information daily. You can trust us as a source of that information. You can also trust the director general of health and the ministry of health. For that information, do feel free to visit at any time to clarify Any
JQHN SPARTAN La tyranne Jacinda Ardern a été nommée à un nouveau poste de censure à l'université de Harvard... Son rôle consistera à utiliser des algorithmes d'IA pour faire du gouvernement "la seule source de vérité"... Jacinda Ardern affirme que "les technologies émergentes telles que l'IA offrent d'énormes possibilités aux gouvernements". https://twitter.com/resist_05/status/1684005017202868224 Traduction : https://t.me/jqhnspartan t.me

@jgalt485 - John Galt ⓩ 🇫🇷 cpt secours JohnGalt1 🇳🇱

16. Une prise de position qui serait risible si le programme n'était pas en phase d'implémentation express (https://t.me/kompromatmedia/3933) dans la plupart des démocratie libérales. Pustula La Hyène qui se félicite du DSA, et se fait corriger par les X mens .... 🤣🤣

KOMPROMAT «Protéger nos démocraties»: von der Leyen comblée par l'entrée en vigueur du DSA, ministère de la Vérité de l'UE «Nous transposons nos valeurs européennes dans le monde numérique», se félicite la technocrate en chef de l'UE. Ce en quoi elle n'a pas tort, la censure étant devenue une valeur cardinale du bloc ces dernières années. «Avec des règles strictes en matière de transparence et de responsabilité, notre loi sur les services numériques vise à protéger nos enfants, nos sociétés et nos démocraties», poursuit la disciple d'Orwell. Le Digital Service Act a pour objectif affiché d'éviter la propagation sur le net des contenus que le ministère de la Vérité jugera dangereux. En premier lieu desquels les «fake news» et la «propagande», qui ne sauraient évidemment venir du camp du bien. «Ils ont peur de la vérité, une arme tranchante», expliquait déjà Vladimir Poutine à propos de l'interdiction de RT. ▶️ #Opération_Mockingbird–«La CIA a compromis les journalistes du monde entier»—Kennedy @kompromatmedia t.me

@jgalt485 - John Galt ⓩ 🇫🇷 cpt secours JohnGalt1 🇳🇱

17. Vous comprenez pourquoi le WEF, l'ONU, l'OMS, l'UE, tous les gouvernements veulent massivement censurer les RS. https://t.co/Jdmy8Q8fho

@jgalt485 - John Galt ⓩ 🇫🇷 cpt secours JohnGalt1 🇳🇱

@Poulin2012 @55Bellechasse @andrebercoff @nicolasputsch @dreslincourt @JusteMilieu3 @Houdiakova @Tocsin_Media @EricMorillot @sergiodde @CPorteu @PhilippeMurer @rougeyronpierre @Carene1984 @Cercle_Aristote @lacavernemythe @VictorSinclair3 @TvlCampagnol @tvlofficiel @BlaiseElise

@jgalt485 - John Galt ⓩ 🇫🇷 cpt secours JohnGalt1 🇳🇱

@YvesPDB @philippeherlin @PanDanTag @tatiann69922625 @mmtchi @silvano_trotta @BugaultV @Don_Quichoute @TribunePop23 @Resistance_SM @fredbascunana @Stephane_Poli @LeBalou90 @HigueroLucien @PolFabrice @jaclostermann @SierraTango74 @GRAZIANILaetiza @FabianAllanic @PinsolleT RT merci

4kychui
Posted - October 26, 2023 at 8:23 PM
Saved - October 26, 2023 at 9:28 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The Covid mRNA vaccines may cause various adverse effects due to the body's immune response to foreign proteins. This can lead to autoimmune destruction in different organs, such as the heart, uterus, and nervous system. These reactions explain the serious injuries and deaths reported. Michael Yeadon, an immunologist, suggests that deliberate inclusion of toxic elements in the vaccine formulation, along with lipid nanoparticles known to accumulate in organs like the ovaries, could also impact fertility. These findings raise concerns about the vaccines' safety and suggest a deliberate intent to harm.

@4kychui - Kychui Ehkytai

voir aussi sur le même journal : Reinformation Tiré de l’art de Anne Dolhein sur les positions du Dr Yeadon : …/… La vaccination covid conçue pour tuer ? Yeadon présente les indices Pourquoi les injections d’ARNm biologique provoquent-elles toute une série d’effets indésirables différents selon les personnes ? Voici ce qu’en dit le chercheur : « Lorsque vous injectez cet ARNm à une personne, qu’il se répand dans son corps et qu’il est absorbé par une cellule, ce message est converti en protéine. Et lorsque votre corps fabrique une protéine étrangère – je vous le garantis en tant qu’immunologiste – votre corps dira “c’est du non-soi” et attaquera la personne qui la produit jusqu’à ce que la cellule soit morte. Et je pense que c’est la cause d’une grande partie – mais pas de la totalité – des réactions indésirables à ces prétendus vaccins. » Par conséquent, ces substances « provoqueront une destruction auto-immune de l’endroit où elles se trouvent ». ▶️« Si cette substance se retrouve dans votre cœur, il y aura une myocardite ou une crise cardiaque. ▶️Si elle pénètre dans l’utérus d’une femme enceinte, c’est la fausse couche. ▶️Si elle pénètre dans le système nerveux, c’est toute une série de problèmes neurologiques. ➡️C’est le problème commun qui sous-tend de nombreuses lésions dues aux vaccins, dont certaines sont si graves que des personnes en sont mortes, comme ce que je pensais probable », a déclaré Michael Yeadon, qui est également diplômé en toxicologie. ➡️Il rappelle en outre que lorsqu’une partie du muscle cardiaque meurt à la suite d’une crise cardiaque ou d’une myocardite, « ce morceau de muscle cardiaque meurt et ne se reconstitue pas ». ▶️« Vous vous retrouvez donc avec un cœur fragilisé. ➡️C’est pourquoi il est si terrible d’entendre parler de myocardite chez les jeunes hommes. ▶️Leur cœur ne va pas se régénérer. Ils auront un cœur fragile pour le restant de leurs jours », a-t-il déploré. Répondant à une question de LifeSiteNews au sujet de ces déclarations, Michael Yeadon vient de préciser : ⏩« Les présumés vaccins ont été conçus pour blesser, mutiler et tuer. ▶️De multiples éléments évidemment toxiques ont été délibérément intégrés dans leur formulation, avec pour résultat des risques élevés de caillots sanguins, d’attaques auto-immunes et de tempêtes de cytokines dans l’ensemble du corps, en fonction de l’endroit où ils se sont retrouvés chez un individu donné. (…) ▶️🔺En outre, les agents ARNm ont été formulés au sein de nanoparticules lipidiques, 🔺dont on sait depuis 2012 qu’elles peuvent s’accumuler dans certains viscères, notamment les ovaires. ➡️🔺Des impacts négatifs sur la fertilité étaient donc également quasiment assurés. 🔺Il est impossible de prétendre que tout cela a été fait par inadvertance. »  Anne Dolhein ( revisité pour la ponctuation et mise en évidence des parties les + importantes par mes soins !()🤫 📛#DireNON 🛑#DireStop 🔴#plasmidgate va également dans le sens des conclusions du Dr M.Yeadon nb : Trop de Zazards ⁉️❗️✨ 🙏🏾👋🏾🫡

10121Ws
Posted - November 13, 2023 at 5:01 PM
Saved - November 14, 2023 at 11:25 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Genetically modified seeds, known as "Terminator seeds," are patented by companies. These seeds can only be used for one crop rotation before becoming unusable. Farmers are forced to buy new seeds every year. This business model is criticized for its negative impact on agriculture.

@10121Ws - WS 10121

𝗦𝗲𝗺𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗲𝘀 𝗧𝗲𝗿𝗺𝗶𝗻𝗮𝘁𝗼𝗿 Je serais plutôt enclin à dire que personne de sain d'esprit n'utilisera jamais ces choses mais malheureusement tout le monde n'est pas sain d'esprit. Les entreprises qui commercialisent ces semances, détiennent des brevets exclusifs sur des https://t.co/bOdzRt3RGz

@10121Ws - WS 10121

semences sans lesquelles aucun paysan ou agriculteur au monde ne peut semer et ensuite récolter. Il ne s'agit toutefois pas de semences ordinaires, mais de celles qui ont été manipulées génétiquement. Les "semences Terminator" constituent un développement particulier. Elle

@10121Ws - WS 10121

n'autorise qu'une seule rotation des cultures. Après cela, les graines se "suicident" et ne peuvent pas être réutilisées comme semences. L'objectif est de s'assurer que les semences doivent être achetées chaque année. Un business que le diable n'aurait pas pu mieux inventer 👿

_aussie17
Posted - November 22, 2023 at 1:26 AM
Saved - November 22, 2023 at 6:47 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
In a recent press conference, EU/FvD members, including MP Marcel De Graff and MP Joachim Kuhs, revealed shocking information from the EMA. The EMA clarified that corona vaccines were approved for individual immunizations, not for controlling or preventing infections. This contradicts government campaigns promoting vaccination to protect others. The EMA also acknowledged that vaccinated individuals can still get infected. The EMA's response undermines the vaccination policy and calls for accountability. The EMA's disregard for adverse events within 14 days of vaccination and the presence of GMO elements in mRNA vaccines raise concerns. The EMA must assess these risks and withdraw market approval. The obscured side effects and deaths associated with vaccines demand immediate action.

@_aussie17 - aussie17

🚨🚨🚨 JUST IN (21 Nov 2023) Press Conference from EU/FvD in the European Parliament led by MP Marcel De Graff @MJRLdeGraaff, MP Joachim Kuhs @Joachim_Kuhs, Willem Engel, Dr Vibeke Manniche and Max Schmeling Highlights------------------------------------------------ "Last month, I wrote a letter to the EMA with Joachim Kuhs and six other colleagues from the European Parliament. The European agency responsible for the admission of medicines to the European market. We asked for clarification on the many problems surrounding the corona vaccines. These problems are so great that we asked the EMA to withdraw the market admission. This month, we received an answer from the EMA to our letter. And this answer contains shocking facts. " "First of all, the EMA explicitly states that it has exclusively allowed the corona vaccines on the market for individual immunizations and absolutely not for the control of infection and absolutely not for preventing or reducing infections. And this is devastating for governments that have gone full circle with the message that you are doing it for someone else." "In fact, the EMA states that the exposure to the virus increases the chance of infections even in those vaccinated. The mass government campaigns to vaccinate yourself to protect your parents, your neighbors, the weaker in society, were not only unauthorized but also completely nonsense and not based on facts." "And I remind you once again that we are still fighting with a gigantic so-called unexplained excessive mortality In short, this information from the EMA is destructive to the developed vaccination policy of Rutte and de Jonge. The government knew that the vaccines would not protect against the spread of the virus, but did not share this information with the citizens. On the contrary, it forced the vaccines on our citizens with lies, obscured the side effects, and thus brought the health of everyone who had taken such a vaccine into danger. The vaccination campaigns should be stopped as soon as possible, and it is simply not safe." "And it does not meet the requirements set by the EMA. And the government and all political parties that supported this should be held accountable for their lies and fraud." "One of the major considerations for people whether or not to take a vaccine is the possible risks and side effects. EMA mentioned in its letter to us, they expect, I quote, "reports of conditions occurring at or soon after vaccination." End quote. This implies that data on adverse events or side effects within 14 days of vaccinations are of the utmost importance to assess the risks related to the vaccines. However, member state officials adopted the policy that as it would take 10 to 14 days for the vaccine to produce spike proteins, adverse events within 14 days after vaccination were not to be registered as related to the vaccination. Statistically, they considered the person who got the vaccine as not vaccinated within those first 14 days. What a nonsense!" "To be very clear, the mRNA is non-human and part of a GMO. Moreover, the recent publications on plasmid DNA contamination in these mRNA injection fluids proves beyond doubt that we are dealing with a GMO product. Regardless of the attempts to redefine the term GMO, following an EU court ruling from 2018, any innovation containing or derived from the use of genetic engineering techniques is to be considered the same as a GMO and subject to the same regulatory approval system. Now, integration of bacterial or viral genetic code into the human genome has been associated with a higher risk of cancer." "The EMA needs to assess all these statistics, the safety, and then take the decision. We demanded from the EMA to withdraw market approval immediately because of all these signals of people dying, of the myocarditis, pericarditis, people with this heart failure, dropping dead on the football field in front of television. That is all related to these vaccines. And that is what has been obscured by bad registration." -------------------------------------------------------

Video Transcript AI Summary
Marcel de Graaf, Willem Engel, and others discuss the safety issues and lack of informed consent surrounding COVID vaccines in a press conference. They highlight the existence of different batches of vaccines with varying risks, the failure of the European Medicines Agency (EMA) to properly inform the public, and the potential long-term side effects. They also question the classification of the vaccines as vaccines rather than gene therapy and raise concerns about the manipulation of data and the lack of transparency. The speakers call for the withdrawal of market authorizations and accountability for those responsible.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Marcel de Graaf, for the IFD Willem Engel, Nederlein, Gescholt in pharmaceutical sciences Maval Och, human rights activist. This is on set and hard marked And under the The effect of on the batches, von Karhonafaxes, batch dependency, Lumrad, Maxi Statisticas, Vibeke is in Paris. After all, Poland, Srivic met Joachim Kuz and Nocze Scholejas from the Europes parliament and briefed under EMA. Over a developed problem on the COVID vaccines. And there's a problem in Zohr wrote that by the EMA Fuhrung on in tracking from the Mark Tula team. The in the Videwele Immunizarzi, an absolute need for behearsing van besmetting, an absolute need for that for coma of Verminere van Besmettingen. And it is ver Nitegend for rehehehehehehehehehehehehehehewol, opetKompanyin, Orcholssein Gesam at the Boatschap and under. The EIMACHAP no ferre, and for Klarstein, anndhorwart, anixi pier, EIMAS p ordenings a reporte over the 2 Latinform faxes benardiche next slide. The aim of Verklaert, her how the bloats telling anaphiras, verhoek to kanst of infectsies the Zorrofen, Ester, Guseldeforge, and Marcel de Graaf, Fierst, my deal today is informazi, nicht metteburgers in Tiefendell, etdrangevakseans, and also Bergevakseans, and also Bergevakseans, Verduso de De Beijewerkingen and Brachtier made a gesundheit from Idereen, disond Vaxseinche, nomheift in Gefaari. The Vaxidancy Companions Speaker 1: Thank you very much, Marcel. I beg your pardon for my bad pronunciation, my bad English, But, if I would have known that, we could I could speak in German, then I would have done it. But now I have an English script. Please, pardon me. There are so many red flags in this COVID affair that it almost hurts your eyes. There's a big thing at stake, the health of our citizens. Many of them have decided to be repeatedly vaccinated against COVID Based on the information they received from their government and doctors, they assumed that they had made a well informed choice and have an informed consent. But informed consent is only possible when the information spread by the member states and its authorities regard these vaccines is The government's vaccines is correct. When misinformation is spread by the governments of our member states, Doctors can't give good advice, and people can't make a good choice whether they want to be vaccinated or not. One of the major consideration for people Whether or not to take a vaccine is a possible risks and side effects. EMA mentioned in its letter to us, They expect, I quote, reports of conditions occurring at at or soon after vaccination, End quote. This implies that data on adverse events or side effects within 14 days of vaccinations Member state officials adopted the policy that as it would take 10 to 14 days for the vaccine to produce Bi proteins, At worst events within 14 days after vaccination were not to be registered as related to the vaccination. What a nonsense. Government policies and also governmental med media campaigns to promote COVID vaccinations are thus Leaving out the risks and side effects that might occur in those 1st 14 days. Most allergic Reactions occur within 20 minutes to 2 hours after getting into contact with the allergen. Side effects of regular vaccines, Our children get normally occur within 1 to 2 days, but yet somehow they just invented This 14 days story to create this fake feeling of security and reducing the amounts of registered side effects. And that's my impression. They did it because they knew from the reports Pfeiffer and Madonna and so on, that many and severe side effects will come. Where are the governmental policies then based on how can doctors correctly advise their patients whether or not to take the vaccines? How can a citizen who is thinking about vaccination then assess for himself the safety of the COVID vaccines? How can there then be a truly informed choice and thus a valid consent when this crucial information is not shared? And why did the EMA not intervene? How can they upheld some market authorization when there is no accurate registration of It was also recently disclosed that the side effects registration institute in the US called VAERS has one register that's public and another closed database that is only available for certain pharmaceutical companies and officials. The closed database contains more more serious and more detailed side effects than the database that is not publicly accessible. That is, of course, unheard of and unacceptable. In this way, the ordinary citizen Who only has access to the public database if not correctly and fully informed about the risks, and, therefore, the citizen cannot give a A truly informed contribution to the vaccination. In Europe, we have a similar database called OITRAVigilance, Do they also have a closed and a public version? Are they also misleading our citizens? I don't know the answers, But we must get this question answered as soon as possible. The health of our citizens is at stake and the next COVID booster Campaigns have already started. Thank you for your attention. Speaker 0: Thank you. Thank you, Joachim. And now I'd like to to give the The floor to, Willem Engel. Speaker 2: Thank you. Speaker 3: So we are here today to inform you, the public and its representatives, About the grave errors and safety issues with the mRNA injections. You've heard from the previous speakers what political mortal sins have been committed by the EMA and the European Commission willfully misleading the public and using pseudoscience and public office to nudge, push and even force people into participating into an uncontrolled and potentially deadly experiment. The EMA has admitted that the information given to the public is not adequate for informed consent. Moreover, the lack of proof for transmission control from the start made the campaign of vaccinating for the other a scam, an illegal marketing campaign That the EMA tries to hide behind the fact that it's just advising the European Commission is weak and unbecoming of an agency that was founded to protect the European public against medical and pharmaceutical mistakes. Moreover, the argument that it would Be a disservice to the frail and elderly who are at risk from corona infection is a false argument as the whole population was forced in some way to participate in this real world experiment. From the EMA and other national institutes, we keep hearing that the Benefits outweigh the risks for each specific case or group. Yet we have seen no assessment or calculation. We have to assume this is a marketing line as it is not backed up by facts. The reality is that We are dealing with a public health crisis as we speak, not caused by a virus, but by these mRNA injections. Many 1,000 have been injured and cannot live a normal life because they were forced to participate in a potentially deadly experiment. Ignoring the Aarhus Treaty is a violation of international law that we have raised, and with us National institutes like the Commission For Genetic Modification, the COHEM. In their reports, they argue that the exemption under directive 20 twenty slash 1043 should be void as it cannot be in the interest of the public to skip studies on environmental impact and human health due to genetically modified organisms, which were used to produce the mRNA injections. To be very clear, the mRNA is nonhuman and part of a GMO. Moreover, the recent publications on plasmid DNA contamination in these mRNA injection fluids proves beyond doubt that we are dealing with a GMO product, regardless the attempts to redefine the term GMO Following an EU court ruling from 2018, any innovation containing or derived from the use of genetic engineering techniques is to be considered the same as an M GMO and subject to the same regulatory approval system. Now, integration of bacterial or viral genetic code into the human genome has been associated with a higher risk of cancer. Whether that will be the case, we don't know. But we should have known, more precisely, the EMA should have known, before giving a positive advice. Another serious concern is the interaction with the microbiome each person carries. By integration of antibiotic resistant genes, Some bacterial or fungal strains could become a health risk. An attempt was made to classify these injections as vaccines, An attempt that continues to this day. In regulation 2009 slash, 120, a line is misinterpreted. Gene therapy shall not include vaccines against infectious diseases. It should be read as mutually exclusive. Two essential components of a vaccine is long lasting immunity, also called active immunity as opposed to the passive immunity derived from antibody therapies. Secondly, a vaccine should contain an antigen. None of the mRNA injections contain an antigen. Using redefinition, omission, and skewing, An appointed expert group has tried to circumvent the regulations guarding the safety on gene therapy by silently changing the classification and and conditions for the marketing application of these mRNA injections. In the directives 2019 slash five And 2021 slash 756, the words corona and coding sequence were added to the conditions after the granting of the original marketing authorizations, making these authorizations themselves proof of fraud. The EMA in her reply is well aware of what happened, but tried to evade answering the questions about the legitimacy of the marketing applications by stating this is a political matter and should be taken up with the European Commission. Rest assured, we will. We will not stop until all mRNA injections are taken off the market. All victims are acknowledged, and those responsible For the biggest scandal in medical history are held accountable. Thank you for your attention. Speaker 0: Thank you, Willem. For you. You have cut the floor. Speaker 4: Yes. Thank you for having us. And I do agree that it's a public health crisis we are in the midst of. I'm one of 3 scientists who are behind the study of batch dependency safety issues, and Max will talk about that in a minute. But what we actually have shown, just to put it shortly, is that there was and still is 3 patterns of the side effects, both Less of the serious side effects and the more serious side effects and also the death. Max will show in a minute, which shows that from the beginning, the batches which were given were the so called bad batches. Actually, along the way, it changed whether whether it was Pfizer who changed the product, whether it was the transportation, we don't know. But what we know is that the patients or the people, the children, the young ones, the elderly who had these side effects, They weren't informed by the risk. They didn't have the benefit. You didn't have the beneficial and the the risk ratio, and some were given very bad batches. And that we know from our study. And that reminds me of what, the vice president from Pfizer said at one point in Nature. She said that, they were building the airplane while flying. And for me, that's obviously what happened because we've shown that one of the wings fell off. And then I'm like, well, if you know you have a safety issue, why don't you handle that safety issue? Why don't you withdraw the batches? Why don't you communicate to the, public? Which EMAN did and all the national, similar institutes didn't. And what our study also shows is that you have this safety issue, but it also shows that, EMA and the national institutions should have actually informed the public because Pfizer did that already in August 21. They actually informed the IMEI that there was a safety issue. They informed the IMEI that some of the badges, what we call the blue badges, gave many more side effects than some of the other batches. So we know that already. We have just replicated our data, into Sweden, which shows us us that It's a European matter. It's not just a Danish matter. It's a European issue. We know that now from Sweden. And I'm quite sure if we looked into the data From the rest of Europe, we would see exactly the same pattern. And what we are now into is that what we've shown was the short term, side effects, But we are very much interested into looking into the long term side effects. You mentioned cancer. Will there be a relation of certain cancers Toward, the the different batches, will there be, a difference between the all cause mortality? You have mentioned, Marcel, the excess mortality. We know from the data that since May 21, it was, like, literally literally on the spot that excess mortality happened In all the European countries, we have, seen those graphs or made those graphs ourselves, and we can see that the excess mortality is still there. Some places may be waning a little, but there's still an excess mortality, and that is very varying. And that brings me back to that I think I would have expected as a citizen. I'm not a politician. I'm just a doctor. I would have expected EMA to react on these data. Even before we published the data in April, I would have expected that they saw the safety issue, that they saw that in the database, and that they, You know, halted some of the vaccination, at least withdrawn, these blues batches and also informed The population, the young ones, the elderly and so on, we do have a problem. So going back to the the thing that the vice president from from Pfizer said, That they were building the airplane while flying, I must say the wing fell off. Thank you. Speaker 0: Thank you. And now I'd like to give the floor to Max Meiling, who is the statistician, who did all the data processing. Max, you have the floor. Speaker 2: Thank you very much. My name is Max Meeling, and I'm the statistician behind this study, Where BIPOCA is the medical, the medical capacity behind it. The, as you can see in front of you on this screen, is the result, The main result of our study, it shows from the official Danish data that we queried For the study, it shows each batch and how many, how many adverse reactions were present in each batch. You can see that along the y axis, the vertical axis, and along the horizontal axis, you can see how big were the batches. I should perhaps just mention a batch is a unit of vaccine that is produced, filled into vials, packaged up and sent out to different countries. As you can see from the graph, some of these batches are very small. Some of them are very big. And in this case, if we, assume that we would see a normal vaccine, a really good vaccine, something that was very consistently produced, We would see a near perfect line, one near perfect line. If we, on the other hand, produce A really horrible vaccine, the worst one we could possibly conceive. We would see no line. We would see just scattered dots. In this case, We see 3, not 1, but we see 3 lines, and they are actually near perfect. The problem with this is that it's obviously, it's something that is completely outside the category of what we should expect to see in adverse Adverse data. And in this case, it very clearly shows right away that It was because of the product's nature, it has been impossible for the, for the participants, for the vaccinees, People who receive the vaccines to give informed consent because if you cannot know the risk, how can how, how can you make Informed consent. How can you give informed consent? That's the main finding of this study, but something that is also very troubling is This shows a system. It shows a structure in the data. Adverse reactions, error, errors in production are, by nature, they're random. But this shows structure. We do not know yet why, But we're obviously researching this this issue, as BB Goetz also mentioned. But, As of now, we do not know why it is, but the only thing that we do know is that this should, by no means, be present. And that is why it's a very alarming safety signal, as has been mentioned. And I would like to stress again this this makes it Absolutely impossible to give informed consent. And I think I would like to stop there. Okay. Thank you. Speaker 0: Thank you, Max. I think you made it very clear that, there are 3 different types of batches, and every batch gives another risk. And, the blue one gives the highest mortality risk. And nobody knew upfront which batch he would get. Nobody knew that there was this difference between these batches. Nobody knew. But the EMA gets samples of every batch, and they can test it, and they can see whether or not they they are identical. And that's their job because their job is to protect us from, mistakes made by pharmaceutical industries. And they didn't. So that's it's very worrying. Thank you for, for making that clear, both of you. And that is also something that, in a second letter to the AMA we are going to address. Be sure of that, as are the things as contamination, by DNA of bacteria in the vaccines, as, are the things that, Joachim mentioned about, are there two databases with adverse, events. How come that the, EMA never warned us? And how could it be that they accepted governments to campaign, for off label use? Is there anyone who would like to ask a question? We still have some minutes before we round up. Yes, please. Speaker 5: 1st of all, thank you very much for your contribution, to this press conference. I have a question in the letter of summons. One of the arguments you have made with regards to the suspension of the marketing authorizations is That in the SMPCs of Pfizer and Moderna, that they are now very comprehensive and unreadable. However, one thing is very clear. I saw on page 4 of the document of the SMPC that is by now 574 pages. It literally mentions some cases required intensive care support and fatal cases have been observed, quote unquote. And, my question is how is it possible that the marketing authorizations have not been suspended And also withdrawn immediately by the EMA, since Pfizer and Moderna themselves admit that the remedy is now worse than the disease. Could you maybe elaborate on that a little bit? Speaker 0: I can tell you this, that's a question for the EMA. The EMA needs to, assess, all these statistics, the safety, and then take the decision. We demanded from the EMA to withdraw market approval immediately because of all these, sick Sorry. Signals of people dying of the myocarditis, pericarditis, people, with this heart failure dropping debt, on the football field, in front of television. That is all, related to these vaccines. And that is what, it has been obscured, obscured by bad registration. So, yes, It's a very, valid point. It only stresses that even now the the pharmaceutical industry is making this, clear statements in their, additional information of 5 74 pages. Sorry. I mean, that is not accessible information for a medical doctor or for a patient. They need to make a very concise, small, clear, list of side effects and, and and the probability. How much how probable how often does it occur? Like, 1 in 10,000, for instance. If 1 in 10,000 vaccinated, will drop dead sorry to put it dead blunt because of the vaccine, then it is much worse than, getting, a COVID infection. So that stated, I think the ball lies now with the EMA to take measures. Thank you. Other questions? None? Okay. [SPEAKER MARCEL DIEGE:] Speaker 5: Well, maybe one more, because, it seems that, You have to have, separate, SMPCs per booster. Could you elaborate on that maybe a little bit more, mister Engel? Speaker 3: Yeah. It's Strange that we see 1 document for all the the variants they have produced. The reasoning of the EMA is that it's Still the same marketing application, and it's a very, concerning point. We see that the clinical trials We're just ongoing for 3 weeks, yet the XBB 1.5 booster was granted a market, authorization. So the EMA really does not follow its own guidelines, and they have created a sort of, punched, A hole in this, overdraftilence, safety registration. So now we have untested, Speaker 0: Okay. Well, sorry, it's, we have to end this, no more questions. Thank you all very much for attending this press conference. Thank you very much for listening or watching us, Speaker 3: Every nation in every region now has a decision to make decisions. Speaker 1: You think I'm joking? Speaker 0: Predator drugs. You Speaker 1: will never see it coming.
LDeclencheur
Posted - November 24, 2023 at 4:21 PM
Saved - November 24, 2023 at 5:46 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
In a press conference at the European Parliament, Willem Engel revealed the scandal of mRNA injections. He emphasized that mRNA is not human and is considered genetically modified. A group of experts attempted to bypass safety regulations by silently altering the classification and market conditions of these mRNA injections. Safety concerns arise from these actions.

@LDeclencheur - Le Déclencheur

3/n Le scandale des injections arrive… (suite) Conférence de presse du 21 novembre 2023 au Parlement européen, avec l'intervention de Willem Engel : «Pour être très clair, l'ARNm n'est pas humain et fait partie des OGM… » «En recourant à la redéfinition, à l’omission et à la distorsion, un groupe d’experts désigné a tenté de contourner les réglementations garantissant la sécurité de la thérapie génique en modifiant silencieusement la classification et les conditions de mise sur le marché de ces injections ARNm»

Video Transcript AI Summary
Today, we are here to inform the public and representatives about the serious errors and safety issues related to mRNA injections. The previous speakers discussed the deadly political mistakes made by the EMA and the European Commission, who deliberately deceived the public and used pseudoscience to push people into potentially deadly experiments. The EMA admitted that the information provided to the public was not for informed consent. The lack of evidence for transmission control from the start makes the vaccination campaign a fraudulent and illegal marketing campaign. The argument that it is a disservice to vulnerable and elderly individuals is false, as the entire population has been forced to participate in this potentially deadly experiment. We demand the removal of all mRNA injections from the market and accountability for those responsible.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Nous sommes donc ici aujourd'hui pour vous informer, vous, le public et les représentants, au sujet des graves erreurs et des problèmes de sécurité liés aux injections d'ARNm. Les orateurs précédents vous ont fait part des erreurs politiques mortelles commises par l'EMA et la Commission européenne, qui ont délibérément trompé le public et utilisé la pseudoscience et la fonction publique pour inciter, pousser et même forcer les gens à participer à une expérience incontrôlés potentiellement mortels. L'EMA a admis que les informations données au public n'étaient pas pour obtenir un consentement éclairé. En outre, l'absence de preuve de contrôle de la transmission dès le départ A fait de la campagne de vaccination pour autrui, une escroquerie, une campagne de marketing illégale, le fait que l'EMA tente de se cacher derrière fonction de conseil auprès de la Commission européenne est peu convaincant et indigne d'une agence fondée pour protéger le public européen contre les erreurs médicales et pharmaceutiques. En outre, l'argument selon lequel ce serait un mauvais service rendu aux personnes fragiles et âgées qui sont exposées au risque d'infection par le corona est un faux argument, Car l'ensemble de la population a été forcée d'une manière ou d'une autre à participer à cette expérience en conditions réelles. L'EMA et d'autres instituts nationaux ne cessent de répéter que les avantages l'emportent sur les risques pour chaque cas ou groupe spécifique. Pourtant, nous n'avons vu aucune évaluation ni aucun chiffre. Nous devons supposer qu'il s'agit d'une ligne marketing car elle n'est pas étayée par des faits. La réalité est que nous sommes confrontés à une crise de santé publique en ce moment même, qui n'est pas causée par un virus, Mais par ces injections d'ARNm, des milliers de personnes ont été blessées et ne peuvent plus vivre normalement parce ont été forcées de participer à une expérience potentiellement mortelle. Ignorer notre histoire est une violation du droit international que nous avons soulevée. Et avec nous, des instituts nationaux comme la Commission pour les modifications génétiques, la COGEM. Dans leur rapport, ils soutiennent que l'exemption prévue par la directive deux-mille-vingt-mille-quarante-trois devrait être annulée, Car il ne peut être dans l'intérêt du public de passer outre les études sur l'impact environnemental et la santé humaine due aux organismes génétiquement modifiés ont été utilisés pour produire les injections d'ARNm Pour être très clair, l'ARNm n'est pas humain et fait partie des OGM. En outre, les récentes publications sur la contamination de l'ADN plasmique dans ces liquides d'injection d'ARNm prouvent sans aucun doute nous avons à faire à un produit OGM, indépendamment des tentatives de redéfinition du terme OGM, à la suite d'une décision 6 de l'UE de deux-mille-dix-huit. Toute innovation contenant ou dérivant de l'utilisation de techniques de génie génétique doit être considéré comme un OGM et soumise au même système d'approbation réglementaire. L'intégration du code génétique bactérien ou viral dans le génome humain a été associée à un risque plus élevé de cancer. Nous ne savons pas si ce sera le cas. Mais nous aurions dû le savoir plus précisément, le m a aurait dû le savoir avant de donner un avis positif. L'interaction avec le microbiome est un autre sujet de préoccupation. Chaque personne est porteuse d'une bi intégration de gènes résistantes aux antibiotiques. Certaines couches bactériens nous fongiques pourraient devenir un risque pour la santé. On a tenté de classer ces injections dans la catégorie des vaccins, Une tentative qui se poursuit encore aujourd'hui. Dans le règlement deux-mille-neuf-cent-vingt, la ligne est mal interprétée. La thérapie génique n'inclut pas les vaccins contre les maladies infectieuses, elle doit être lue comme s'excluant mutuellement. Les deux composantes essentielles d'un vaccin sont une immunité durable également appelée immunité active par opposition à l'immunité passive dérivée des thérapies par anticorps. Deuxièmement, un vaccin doit contenir un antigène. Aucune des injections d'ARNm ne contient un antigène. En recourant à la redéfinition, à l'omission et à la distorsion, un groupe d'experts désignés a tenté de contourner les réglementations garantissant la de la thérapie génique en modifiant silencieusement la classification et les conditions de mise sur le marché de ces injections d'ARNm. Dans les directives deux-mille-dix-neuf-cinq et deux-mille-vingt-et-un sept-cent-cinquante-six, Les mots corona et séquences codantes ont été ajoutés aux conditions après l'octroi des autorisations de mise sur le marché initial. Ce qui fait de ces autorisations une preuve de fraude. L'EMA dans sa réponse est bien consciente de ce qui s'est passé, Mais a tenté d'éluder les questions relatives à la légitimité de la demande de mise sur le marché, en déclarant qu'il s'agissait d'une question politique qu'elle devait être abordée avec la commission européenne. Je suis assuré que nous le ferons. Nous ne nous arrêterons pas tant que toutes les injections d'ARNm n'auront pas été retirées du marché. Toutes les victimes seront reconnues et les responsables du plus grand scandale de l'histoire de la médecine Devrons rendre des comptes. Merci de votre attention.
DiedSuddenlyFR
Posted - November 25, 2023 at 4:36 PM
Saved - November 25, 2023 at 8:53 PM

@DiedSuddenlyFR - 💉☠️🇫🇷 DIED SUDDENLY FRANCE 🔔

"Si vous contrôlez la nourriture, vous contrôlez les gens. C'est en fin de compte l'objectif final." Partout dans le monde, des organismes mondialistes non élus comme l'ONU et le WEF mènent la guerre contre les agriculteurs, dans le but de... 1/2 https://t.co/uVw3Dg1yIa

Video Transcript AI Summary
Bill Gates and his foundation are acquiring farmland and promoting a specific type of agriculture without animal-based proteins. This approach is causing damage and displacing small family farms worldwide. The government and corporate mega farms are shutting down small and medium-sized farms due to compliance issues and excessive regulations. This trend is seen in China, where small farms are being replaced by large government-controlled mega farms, forcing families into overcrowded cities. The global agenda against farmers is evident, as governments push these regulations worldwide. The solution to environmental issues lies in getting the top 20 countries responsible for 80% of emissions to take action, which requires leveraging money.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: When you start to see people like Bill Gates gobble up farmland and you read what his foundation says about farming when they say that we are going to have a particular type of agriculture, they want large blocks run by the government or by private consortia where they say, we're not gonna have animal based proteins. We're not gonna have stockyards. We're not gonna have turkey farms. We're not gonna have chicken. The academic mind always has the answers, but never in the real world. And they do a lot of damage Speaker 1: Everywhere you look, small and medium sized farms being gobbled up by these corporate mega farms because they can't keep up anymore. They can't comply I with these endless streams of regulations that are coming down. We're seeing that in China now where these giant mechanized corporate, big government controlled mega farms are, displacing all these little small family farms that families have been farming for 100 of years. In some cases longer, They're moving them all off their little plots of land and moving them into these big, horrific mega cities that they have built. And we're gonna see that all over the world With the decimation of small farms. So if they're not bankrupted by economic forces, the government itself will shut them down. Speaker 2: Everything is falling apart. There is a shortage of food. Many people, do not have don't have money to eat every day. Speaker 3: Everybody's out here today because they understand that when our government actually expropriates our Farmers, you know, we're all next. Not just Holland is now facing these types of regulations, but you can see the attack on farmers all over the world. It's an agenda that is carried out on a global level that is being pushed through government officials in perspective countries. Base. Speaker 0: This is precisely how the globalists have managed to take over national parliaments and national Speaker 4: 20 countries equaled 80% of all the emissions. You solve the problem to start with by I'm making sure all of those 20 countries are doing what they need to do. We have to pull them to the table and leverage further. So how do we get there? Well, the lesson I've learned in the last Here is money, money, money, money, money.
CPorteu
Posted - December 6, 2023 at 9:17 AM
Saved - December 7, 2023 at 7:45 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The rise of Talentism, a new form of capitalism managed by AI, could potentially eliminate the need for elections. This aligns with the vision of the World Economic Forum (WEF) and its founder, Klaus Schwab. The WEF has been working towards inclusive capitalism in collaboration with the Vatican. However, critics argue that this strategy allows unelected elites to govern the world under the guise of solidarity and responsibility. The WEF's website provides insights into our immediate future, and there is an urgent push to ratify laws by a simple majority at the European Council on December 15th. This acceleration is driven by a financial crisis that threatens globalism. The media's silence on these matters is concerning, as it hampers democratic debate. Journalists must remember their duty to inform the public, especially since many are funded by taxpayers. The implementation of a new European state is outlined in a diagram, and questions arise regarding potential glitches or intentional manipulation. The recent comments from Thierry Breton highlight the significance of AI in these developments. It is crucial to address these issues and safeguard democracy and sovereignty.

@CPorteu - Caroline Porteu

Ere du Talentisme , nouveau capitalisme géré par l'IA Un avenir sans élections , commandé par l'IA dotée d'un "pouvoir prescriptif"

@wideawake_media - Wide Awake Media

In a conversation with Google founder Sergey Brin, founder of the WEF, Klaus Schwab, delights at the thought of a future without elections: "Digital technologies mainly have an analytical power. Now [we're going] into a predictive power, and your company is very much involved in it. But then the next step could be to go into prescriptive mode, which means you do not even have to have elections anymore, because we know what the result will be." Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ffvu6Mr1SVc For more content like this, visit: https://wide-awake-media.com #KlausSchwab #WorldEconomicForum #GreatReset

Video Transcript AI Summary
Technology has evolved from having analytical power to now having predictive power. Our company is actively involved in this advancement. The next step could be moving towards a prescriptive mode, where elections may no longer be necessary because we can accurately predict the outcome beforehand. This raises the question of whether elections are still needed if we already know the result.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So technology now is and digital technologies mainly have an analytical power. Now we go into a predictive power and we have seen the first examples and your company very much involved into it. But since the next step could be to go into prescriptive mode, which means, you you do not even have have elections anymore because you can already predict what predict and afterwards you can say why do we need elections because we know what the result will be.
Wide Awake Media - News and commentary on the long-term agenda for global control that's unfolding before our eyes. News and commentary on the long-term agenda for global control that's unfolding before our eyes. wide-awake-media.com

@CPorteu - Caroline Porteu

Il y a trois ans était créé , avec le Vatican , le Conseil pour un capitalisme inclusif !https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/le-conseil-pour-un-capitalisme-inclusif-avec-le-vatican-une-nouvelle-alliance-de-dirigeants-d-entreprises-mondiales-demarre-aujourd-hui-843544232.html

Le Conseil pour un capitalisme inclusif avec le Vatican, une nouvelle alliance de dirigeants d'entreprises mondiales, démarre aujourd'hui /PRNewswire/ -- Le Conseil pour un capitalisme inclusif avec le Vatican (« le Conseil »), un nouveau partenariat historique entre certains des plus grands... prnewswire.com

@CPorteu - Caroline Porteu

En fait , les deux discours se rejoignent dans une stratégie commune qui est bien celle de faire en sorte que la gouvernance mondiale soit assurée par des élites non élues au prétexte d'une économie plus solidaire et plus responsable!!!

@CPorteu - Caroline Porteu

Le site du World Economic Forum est totalement accessible et je suggère à tous d'aller regarder ce qui est dit et démontré concernant notre futur immédiat ! https://intelligence.weforum.org/topics/a1Gb0000000LHN2EAO

Strategic Intelligence | World Economic Forum Strategic insights and contextual intelligence from the World Economic Forum. Explore and monitor the issues and forces driving transformational change across economies, industries and systems. intelligence.weforum.org

@CPorteu - Caroline Porteu

Nous constatons une véritable accélération dans la mise en place de cette stratégie avec en particulier les lois qui doivent être ratifiées définitivement par majorité simple au Conseil européen le 15 Décembre prochain , objet de mon thread précédent :

@CPorteu - Caroline Porteu

Le décès de l'Etat Nation nommé France est annoncé pour le 15 Décembre ! Dans une omerta médiatique totale . Il nous reste donc 13 Jours pour essayer de sauver notre démocratie et notre souveraineté ! Le Conseil Européen vient de fixer cette date !

@CPorteu - Caroline Porteu

Le vote d'aujourd'hui à Bruxelles viendra consacrer cette nouvelle religion qui interdit aux hérétiques de contester le dogme sous peine d'être condamné au bûcher de l'opinion publique .. (le monstre évoqué par le Council of Inclusive Capitalism)

@ThierryBreton - Thierry Breton

This Wednesday could be the final trilogue of our pioneering #AIAct. Meanwhile, I've asked a general-purpose AI to depict our 🇪🇺 law. For every 10 likes, I will ask to make it more innovative & trustworthy. And more epic too. Starting with this one ⤵️

@CPorteu - Caroline Porteu

Une fois de plus , vous pouvez constater l'importance de l'IA dans les dernières déclarations de Thierry Breton sur le sujet . Je vous laisse lire les commentaires

@CPorteu - Caroline Porteu

Mais pourquoi cette accélération et cette précipitation ? Il est probable que cela vienne d'une crise sans précédent du mondialisme financier qui comme le dit très bien Bruno Bertez est devenu un ogre qui ne survit que de sa destruction accélérée https://brunobertez.com/2023/12/04/billet-la-crise-du-systeme-capitaliste-financier-le-systeme-ne-survit-que-de-sa-destruction-acceleree/

Billet. La crise du Système capitaliste financier. Le système ne survit que de sa destruction accélérée. Le capitalisme est un Système. C'est un système de production mais aussi un système social de répartition de ce qui est produit. Ses caractéristiques sont l'accumulation et le besoin de profit pour soutenir cette accumulation, laquelle produit l'ordre social. Un système est un ensemble d'éléments interagissant entre eux selon certains principes ou règles. Par exemple une… brunobertez.com

@CPorteu - Caroline Porteu

Cette omerta médiatique sur ces sujets, omerta que l'on peut appeler censure puisque tout est public, me sidère de plus en plus. Le débat démocratique a besoin d'un minimum de relai d'information pour pouvoir avoir lieu . L'omerta/censure actuelle interdit ce débat

@CPorteu - Caroline Porteu

Il faut rappeler aux journalistes de notre pays que leur premier devoir est "la mission d'information" , notion qu'ils ont visiblement totalement oubliée alors qu'en plus bon nombre d'entre eux sont payés par nos impôts, ce qui est un scandale de plus

@CPorteu - Caroline Porteu

@CH_Gallois @UPR_Asselineau @PhilippeMurer @Vukuzman @rougeyronpierre @Cercle_Aristote @dupontaignan @Guillaume_Bigot @Stephane_Poli @Bertrand55B @YvesPDB @Verhaeghe @edouardhusson @DubreuilhMarcel @LeMediaEn442 @CNEWS @PascalPraud @christine_kelly @f_philippot

@CPorteu - Caroline Porteu

J'ajoute car de nombreuses personnes m'ont posé la question lors de mon précédent thread , que les étapes concernant la mise en place du Nouvel ETAT EUROPEEN , est parfaitement décrite dans ce petit schéma https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/fr/document/EPRS_BRI(2022)733615

Erreur 404 | Think Tank | Parlement européen Erreur 404 europarl.europa.eu

@CPorteu - Caroline Porteu

@CPorteu - Caroline Porteu

ON a le droit de se poser la question : GAG ou BUG Monstrueux sur le site Légifrance https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/codes/texte_lc/LEGITEXT000006069574/

Codes - Légifrance Codes legifrance.gouv.fr

@CPorteu - Caroline Porteu

L'AFP factuel a publié des commentaires sur les votes de résolution du 22 Novembre dernier objet de mon thread . Un paragraphe de cette publication m'a fait sourire ! https://factuel.afp.com/doc.afp.com.346C3M8

Non, le Parlement européen n'a pas supprimé le "droit de veto" des Etats de l'Union européenne A l'approche des élections européennes, en juin 2024, la question de l'élargissement de l'UE anime le débat politique. Dans ce contexte, certains internautes comme élus politiques ont affirmé, fin novembre 2023, que le Parlement européen avait supprimé "le droit de veto" des pays de l'Union européenne, en r... factuel.afp.com
CH_Gallois
Posted - January 23, 2024 at 7:56 AM
Saved - January 23, 2024 at 6:30 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The European Parliament adopted a resolution on January 17th regarding European historical consciousness. The resolution emphasizes prioritizing European and global history over national history, promoting a sense of European belonging, and addressing gender and multicultural perspectives in history education. The resolution was supported by various political groups, including the PPE, Renew, S&D, and Verts/ALE. A majority of 409 MEPs voted in favor, including members from Renaissance, Modem, PS, and EELV, while LR members abstained and some FI members also abstained.

@CH_Gallois - Charles-Henri Gallois 🇫🇷

Le Parlement européen a adopté une résolution hallucinante le 17 janvier concernant la conscience historique européenne ! Le rapport voté comporte entre autres les éléments suivants : ❌ Faire passer l'histoire européenne et mondiale avant l'histoire nationale. En d'autres termes, il faut arrêter d'être fiers d'être français et effacer l'histoire nationale. ❌Il est au contraire obligatoire de chanter les louanges de l'Union européenne et il est indispensable de faire émerger le sentiment d'appartenance européenne. ❌ Wokisme et haine de soi : « les stéréotypes sexistes, les asymétries de pouvoir et les inégalités structurelles sont profondément ancrés dans l’histoire européenne. » | « déplore l’absence d’une approche suffisamment multiculturelle et sensible au genre dans l’enseignement de l’histoire »

@CH_Gallois - Charles-Henri Gallois 🇫🇷

Ce texte a été à l'initiative d'un rapport du PPE, le groupe parlementaire des LR de François-Xavier Bellamy. Il a été voté en Commission par le PPE, Renew (groupe de Renaissance d'Olivier Véran), S&D (groupe du PS de Raphaël Glusckmann) et Verts/ALE (groupe d'EELV de Marie Toussaint). Le texte en question en intégralité ⤵️ https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2023-0402_FR.pdf

European Parliament - File not found The Internet address (url) you wanted to consult does not exist europarl.europa.eu

@CH_Gallois - Charles-Henri Gallois 🇫🇷

Au parlement européen, 409 députés européens ont voté cette abomination. C'est une majorité écrasante. Les députés français de Renaissance, du Modem, du PS et d'EELV ont voté pour. Le groupe PPE de LR a voté massivement pour. Les députés LR se sont abstenus, de même qu'Aubry et Maurel pour la FI.

SimonSecours
Posted - January 23, 2024 at 12:37 PM
Saved - January 23, 2024 at 7:11 PM

@SimonSecours - SIMON STRUEUX (30) compte secours

Comment Tedros a pu être élu Directeur général de l’OMS pour un mandat de 5 ans, par les États Membres de l’Organisation, en mai 2017 ? Un gars, qui je rappelle est condamné dans son pays d'origine, l'Éthiopie, pour crime contre l’humanité...

@EclaireLutin - Lutin éclairé

#AgriculteursEnColere voilà un de vos ennemis 🛑Le chef de l'OMS, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, déclare la guerre à la viande et à l'agriculture traditionnelle, au nom de la lutte contre le « changement climatique » : "Nos systèmes alimentaires nuisent à la santé des populations et de la planète. Les systèmes alimentaires contribuent à plus de 30 % des émissions de gaz à effet de serre et représentent près d'un tiers de la charge mondiale de morbidité." "Transformer les systèmes alimentaires est donc essentiel, en s'orientant vers des alimentations plus saines, diversifiées et davantage végétales." Quelqu'un se souvient-il d'avoir élu ce clown pour dicter quels types d'agriculture et de régimes alimentaires sont autorisés ? Non, moi non plus. Suivre mon compte de sauvegarde : @wide_awake_news

Video Transcript AI Summary
Food systems contribute to greenhouse gas emissions and global disease burden. Transforming food systems by promoting healthier, plant-based diets could save millions of lives annually. The World Health Organization (WHO) is dedicated to assisting countries in developing and implementing policies to improve diets and combat climate change. The speaker is pleased that more than 130 countries have signed the COP 28 UAE declaration on climate and health, emphasizing the importance of protecting and promoting the health of both people and the planet.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Our food systems are harming the health of people and planet. Food systems contribute to over 30% of greenhouse gas emissions and account for almost 1 third of the global burden of disease. Transforming food systems is therefore essential by shifting towards healthier, diversified, and more plant based diets. If food systems delivered healthy diets for all, we could save 8,000,000 lives per year. WHO is committed to supporting countries to develop and implement policies to improve diets and fight climate change. I'm, therefore, very pleased that over 130 countries have signed the COP 28 UAE declaration home climate and health. Together, we can protect and promote the health of both people and planet.
BanounHelene
Posted - January 26, 2024 at 8:41 AM
Saved - January 27, 2024 at 1:11 AM

@BanounHelene - Hélène Banoun

C'est le même combat que celui contre les ARNm : ces produits sont des thérapies géniques mais ont été réglementés comme des vaccins Banoun, H. mRNA: Vaccine or Gene Therapy? The Safety Regulatory Issues. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 10514. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37445690/

mRNA: Vaccine or Gene Therapy? The Safety Regulatory Issues - PubMed COVID-19 vaccines were developed and approved rapidly in response to the urgency created by the pandemic. No specific regulations existed at the time they were marketed. The regulatory agencies therefore adapted them as a matter of urgency. Now that the pandemic emergency has passed, it is time to c … pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

@AssoPollinis - POLLINIS

Ce vote décisif @Europarl_FR sur la dérégulation des #NouveauxOGM #NGT aura comme conséquence le renforcement du modèle agricole intensif, principal responsable de l’effondrement des #pollinisateurs et de la #biodiversité. Ce règlement est inacceptable pour plusieurs raisons : https://t.co/8cftAluyVF

RWMaloneMD
Posted - November 16, 2024 at 9:29 PM
Saved - November 22, 2024 at 1:22 PM

@RWMaloneMD - Robert W Malone, MD

Low Level Chronic Glyphosate Harms in Fetal Development and Reproductive Toxicity 45 scientific papers to encourage you to stop buying conventional foods Click on the link for the essay and data. https://www.malone.news/p/low-level-chronic-glyphosate-harms

Low Level Chronic Glyphosate Harms in Fetal Development and Reproductive Toxicity 45 scientific papers to encourage you to stop buying conventional foods malone.news
JimFergusonUK
Posted - June 1, 2025 at 8:31 AM
Saved - June 1, 2025 at 10:25 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The USDA has approved genetically engineered vaccines for use in organic food production, compromising the integrity of the organic label. This change means that animals treated with DNA-altering injections can now be sold as certified organic, leading to concerns about purity and consumer deception. I believe this move reflects a broader agenda to undermine clean food and personal choice, as regulatory loopholes allow GE technology to infiltrate our food supply. It's crucial to defend the integrity of organic farming before it's irreversibly altered.

@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson

BREAKING:🚨 ORGANIC ISN’T SAFE ANYMORE — USDA OPENS THE DOOR TO GENETIC ENGINEERING 🚨 🔴 The USDA has quietly approved genetically engineered (GE) vaccines for use in organic food production. 🔴 Yes — the very label millions trust is being corrupted from within. 🔴 Animals treated with DNA-altering injections can now be sold as certified organic. 🔥 THIS ISN’T SCIENCE — THIS IS SABOTAGE 🔥 📢 WHAT THIS MEANS: ⚠️ The "organic" label no longer guarantees purity. ⚠️ GE technology is being smuggled into your food through regulatory loopholes. ⚠️ Consumers are being deliberately deceived. ⚠️ This is a globalist war on clean food, bodily autonomy, and informed choice. 💥 First, they altered the food supply. 💥 Then, they blurred the labels. 💥 Now, they’re injecting biotechnology into what was once sacred — our organic farms. 🚨 THIS ISN’T ABOUT HEALTH — THIS IS ABOUT CONTROL 🚨 Corrupt agencies. Complicit certifiers. They want a future where nothing is natural — and nothing is yours. 👊 Reject the deception. Defend organic integrity. Because once it's gone — it's gone forever. https://www.naturalnews.com/2023-08-22-usda-allows-ge-vaccines-in-organic-food-production.html

BEWARE: USDA allows genetically engineered vaccines to infiltrate organic food production – NaturalNews.com The Alliance for Natural Health (ANH-USA) discussed in an article how the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and other organic certifiers are allowing the genetically engineered (GE) vaccines to infiltrate organic food production. In 2019 the National Organic Standards Board (NOSB), an advisory committee of the USDA, decided to consider the use of vaccines produced through “excluded methods” or […] naturalnews.com
ValerieAnne1970
Posted - August 5, 2025 at 8:33 AM
Saved - August 5, 2025 at 9:34 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared information about mRNA vaccines being injected into milk bubbles and fed to mice, demonstrating that messenger RNA can cross the GI tract. I highlighted the USDA's collaboration with Merck on genetic vaccines for pets and livestock, including canine influenza and swine vaccines, which could pose risks to humans through shedding. Additionally, I raised concerns about Bayer/Monsanto's use of RNA spray technology on food crops without long-term studies, emphasizing the potential toxicity to both the environment and consumers.

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

"mRNA Vaccines Were Injected Into Milk Bubbles & Fed To Mice...Within 3 Feedings The Mice Were Fully Vaccinated." Dr Peter McCullough "This Proves That Messenger RNA Crosses The GI Tract." "The USDA Has An Entire Array Of Genetic Vaccines That They Are Developing With Merck." Merck Animal Health vaccines & related developments: Companion animals Canine Influenza: Merck has developed & received USDA approval for the NOBIVAC NXT Canine Flu H3N2 vaccine, which uses RNA-particle self replicating spray technology to protect dogs against canine influenza. Feline Leukemia Virus (FeLV): The USDA also approved the NOBIVAC NXT FeLV vaccine, which utilizes the same RNA-particle self replicating spray technology as the canine influenza vaccine. This is toxic for your family pets & you *⃣ when your pet sneezes or gets saliva on you, you receive the vaccine too, thru shedding. Livestock Cattle: Merck offers a range of vaccines for cattle under the BOVILIS name, including enteric disease caused by bovine coronavirus (BOVILIS CORONAVIRUS). Swine: Merck's acquired company, Harrisvaccines, received USDA licensure for its RNA Particle (RP) vaccine platform, allowing for the manufacturing of herd-specific, custom vaccines for various diseases including those impacting swine. Poultry: Merck Animal Health partnered with Cambridge Technologies to be the exclusive sales agent for their autogenous poultry vaccines, including an experimental vaccine for avian metapneumovirus type B, which received USDA approval for manufacturing & sale. This is toxic for livestock & to you *⃣ you will be consuming the self replicating RNA spike protein. Bayer Monsanto Food Crops Big Ag & Bayer/Monsanto are rolling out RNA spray technology on common food crops — without long term studies on health or environmental impacts. Here's a list of crops that could be sprayed with mRNA interference (RNAi) sprays👇🏽 Potatoes Tomatoes Corn Cabbage Cotton Papaya Peas Cucumber Grapes Strawberries Zucchini Soybeans Wheat Chickpeas Rice Barley Lettuce Spinach These will be toxic to vegetables, fruit, our soil & to you *⃣ you will be consuming self replicating RNA spike protein. No mandatory labeling will be required for crops treated with mRNA sprays in the US. 👇Exosome mRNA Vaccine Fed To Mice In Milk👇 https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10058540/ 👇USDA Approves Merck Spray Family Pet Vaccine👇 https://www.merck.com/news/usda-approves-merck-animal-healths-nobivac-nxt-canine-flu-h3n2-the-first-and-only-rna-particle-technology-vaccine-for-canine-influenza/ 👇Expanding Edible Plant Based Vaccines👇 https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5492011/ Speaker: Dr Peter McCullough, MD Video: @toxins_in_children

Video Transcript AI Summary
In 2022, Zhang and colleagues reportedly stabilized a segment of the spike protein receptor binding domain in an exosome and immunized mice by feeding them milk containing it, suggesting mRNA can cross the GI tract. The USDA is allegedly co-developing genetic vaccines for the food supply, including vegetables, fruits, and livestock. Self-replicating RNA vaccines are already used in pork to prevent porcine diseases. Despite some experts believing conventional veterinary vaccines are sufficient, Merck is advancing the technology for livestock, with proposals for use in cattle. Missouri has attempted to legislate transparency regarding the use of genetic vaccines to protect the food supply.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: 2022, Zhang and colleagues from a small Chinese company took a restricted segment of the genetic code for the spike protein receptor binding domain, and they were able to stabilize it in an exosome, a phospholipid packet, like a milk bubble. And they actually gave milk through feedings to mice. And with three feedings, they were successfully able to immunize the mice. So they proved that messenger RNA cross es the GI tract and the USDA has an entire array of genetic vaccines that they are in co development with companies for vaccination of the food supply. Both the the vegetable and fruits food supply as well as livestock. Now the vaccines in livestock so far and and by the way, self replicating RNA vaccines are used in pork. They are used to prevent, you know, poor sign diseases at this juncture. Many experts believe they're not needed. The conventional veterinary vaccines work fine. Livestock supplies find that there this technology is not needed. But yet it's being advanced by the drug companies predominantly Merck. It's been proposed in cattle. It's not yet in cattle. Missouri has had a house built to at least get transparency on this, and they've tried to advance this. Americans want transparency if genetic vaccines are used to protect
Intraduodenal Delivery of Exosome-Loaded SARS-CoV-2 RBD mRNA Induces a Neutralizing Antibody Response in Mice Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV-2), which causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), has presented numerous challenges to global health. Vaccines, including lipid—based nanoparticle mRNA, inactivated virus, and ... pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
USDA Approves Merck Animal Health’s NOBIVAC® NXT Canine Flu H3N2 – The First and Only RNA-Particle Technology Vaccine for Canine Influenza - Merck.com Innovative technology represents a breakthrough scientific achievement for highly contagious respiratory disease RAHWAY, N.J., June 25, 2024 – Merck Animal Health, known as MSD Animal Health outside of the United States and Canada, a division of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, N.J., USA (NYSE:MRK), announced today the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) approval of NOBIVAC ® NXT Canine Flu H3N2, a next-level solution to help safeguard dogs against the ongoing threat of canine influenza. The product is expected to be available at veterinary clinics and hospitals nationwide late this summer. Merck Animal Health has a long-standing commitment to discovering and developing innovative preventive medicines that support veterinary healthcare teams and improve the lives of pets. NOBIVAC NXT is a revolutionary, first-of-its-kind vaccine technology for companion animals that leverages RNA-particle technology, allowing for a precise immune response to protect against a wide range of viral and merck.com
Disease Prevention: An Opportunity to Expand Edible Plant-Based Vaccines? The lethality of infectious diseases has decreased due to the implementation of crucial sanitary procedures such as vaccination. However, the resurgence of pathogenic diseases in different parts of the world has revealed the importance of ... pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
XPHOENIXDRAGON
Posted - October 14, 2025 at 12:40 PM
Saved - October 15, 2025 at 2:56 AM

@XPHOENIXDRAGON - 𝐏𝐇𝐎𝐄𝐍𝐈𝐗🐦‍🔥𝐃𝐑𝐀𝐆𝐎𝐍

🚨⚠️HOW GMO COMPANIES MONOPOLISE AGRICULTURE AND LOOK OUT FOR YOUR HEALTH. https://t.co/p7EuMwyLgZ

Video Transcript AI Summary
Checklist for summary approach: - Identify and preserve the core claims about GMO technology, safety concerns, and corporate motives as presented. - Highlight explicit examples and mechanisms (insertion of genes, Bt toxin, built-in pesticides, herbicide tolerance, seed patents). - Note the portrayed regulatory and legal dynamics (lobbying, revolving door, labeling, litigation, seed saving restrictions). - Emphasize unique or provocative elements (codfish gene for frost resistance, Indian BT cotton suicides link, cross-pollination as “not our problem”). - Exclude repetitive or filler content; avoid adding new judgments or opinions. - Translate or retain English phrasing of key statements exactly as needed. - Keep the summary within 388–486 words. Genetically modified organisms (GMO) are presented as a comprehensive, almost omnipotent solution to modern nutrition and farming, combining inserted insect and fish genes, irradiation, and pesticides embedded in crops. The narrative asserts: “Our GM scientists are putting the pesticide right inside the crops,” so the food itself will “kill those pesky critters stone cold dead.” It claims Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) toxin, produced by the inserted gene, destroys insects’ stomachs but not humans, adding, “We have absolutely no testing results to prove that these are safe, but they are. Trust us.” It argues that pesticides in crops enable plants to withstand more weed killer than organic crops, promising “No weeds, no bugs. More food, more profit.” The transcript lists staple crops: corn, rice, soybeans, cotton, alfalfa, papaya, oilseed rape, and adds that “GM is the gift that keeps on giving,” with ambitions including frost-resistant traits such as codfish genes in strawberries for the icy North Atlantic environment: “insert a gene from a codfish… Result, frost resistant strawberries.” It frames the looming challenge of population growth and food security as justification for rapid GMO adoption. Testing anecdotes are cited: “tests on rats eating genetically modified potatoes showed them growing slower after two or three generations and developing fertility problems, some organ development issues.” The speakers disparage critics as “goody two shoes scientists” and “whiny campaigners,” insisting they will wait to see human effects while biotech profits fund further GMO experiments. A central strategy is to persuade farmers to abandon organic farming in favor of GM, accompanied by aggressive seed patenting: “Whenever we change the natural gene sequence of any plant, we get a patent ASAP. It’s our invention after all. … total control of the seed.” Seed saving would be prohibited: “If you save seeds for next year’s crop, we’ll know. We’ll tie up farmers for years in the courts.” Farmers must buy new seeds and pesticides yearly; cross-pollination is dismissed as not their problem, and “your crops belong to us” once genes migrate. Regulatory capture and lobbying are described as routine: a “revolving door” between industry and judges, former GM lawyers in regulation bodies, and efforts to keep GMO labeling off products. The piece notes India’s BT cotton saga, claiming “hundreds of thousands of farmers have been organically recycled to dodge debts that they owe us,” with debts supposedly dying with farmers under Indian law and Bt cotton’s yields and bollworm resistance threatening revenue, as the strategy envisions becoming the sole cotton-seed supplier. European concerns about GMO pig feet—sterilization and growth issues—are acknowledged, with plans to work around them. The closing pitch invites consumption: “Eat up your veggies… there’ll be plenty for everyone for the right price.”
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hey, kid. What's up? Do you hate having to eat those healthy vegetables? Is nutrition getting you down? Well, cheer up. Help's on the way. Say hello to g m o, genetically modified organisms. You can eat them all day. Not only will mealtimes be extra delicious, they'll also contain oodles and oodles and insect genes and fish genes. Just think of all that extra yummy goodness. But that's not all. We're irradiating everything you eat, so you'll never have to absorb a single nasty nutrient ever again. And don't forget about pesticides, plenty of those. Yes, sir. Like to know more? Well, let's take a look. Corn is a staple food used in many, many ways throughout the food industry. Growing it takes time, money, and lots of pesticides to protect the crops from bugs, vermin, and fungus. Now some people think that pesticides made by big biotechs are harmful for humans, animals, and the environment, but that's okay. We've solved that problem. Our GM scientists are putting the pesticide right inside the crops. That's right. Isn't that amazing? The food itself will kill those pesky critters stone cold dead. Now some people are worried about the bees dying off. Busy bees pollinate billions of dollars worth of crops, vegetables, fruit, flowers, you name it. But some insects are just plain greedy. They'll eat everything inside if you don't watch out. GMO to the rescue. Thanks to genetic engineering, the plant produces a toxin from the newly inserted bacterium gene. The toxin kills insects, but not humans. The bacillus thuringiensis toxin destroys the insects' stomachs. Ouch. We have absolutely no testing results to prove that these are safe, but they are. Trust us. We care. And because the pesticides are already growing right inside the crop, GM plants can withstand more weed killer than the old fashioned organic crops. No weeds, no bugs. More food, more profit. What's not to like? But that GMO goodness isn't just about corn. There's rice, soybeans, cotton, alfalfa, soybeans, papaya, soybeans, oilseed rape. Is that all? Not on your life. GM is the gift that keeps on giving. The possibilities are endless. Just imagine you're a limey Brit trying to grow strawberries in the frozen wastes of Scotland land. Well, in the future, why not insert a gene from a codfish who's built to thrive in the icy North Atlantic? Result, frost resistant strawberries. Wow. I want it now. The effects of GMO food on humans aren't as tried and tested as we'd like, but there are much more important things that need our attention right away. The population is exploding. How will we feed everyone? We need food security, and we need it now. But just because tests on rats eating genetically modified potatoes showed them growing slower after two or three generations and developing fertility problems, oh, and some organ development issues, Some goody two shoes scientists and whiny campaigners worry that that might happen to humans too. Well, let's wait and see. In the meantime, the biotech companies can rake in the profits that will fund more exciting GMO experiments. We love farms. We love them so much, we want them all. We want to persuade every potential partner farmer to forget all about that silly organic farming and get with us on the GMO bandwagon. Whenever we change the natural gene sequence of any plant, we get a patent ASAP. It's our invention after all. Hey, the new GMO plants are our intellectual property. We aim to achieve total control of the seed. Got an organic farm nearby? Great. Soon, everything you grow will be enhanced by the altered genes from our GM crops. Isn't nature wonderful? And what better way to spread the GMO goodness around than the wind? Accidental cross pollination isn't our problem, and it's no excuse for profit loss. And once our genes get into your crops, your crops belong to us. Yep. Well, it's our technology. If you're going to use it, you've got to pay. We don't care how it got there. When we own the food, we will own life. So those naughty farmers better not save their seeds for next year's crop. If they do, we'll know. We'll tie up farmers for years in the courts. Farmers will just have to buy more seeds next year and more pesticides too. It's win win all around. If you wanna fight us, we might just take your farm as a settlement. But we're human. Just thanks mother nature, but we'll take it from here. But we're doing all this for you, Johnny. Don't forget that. And if it's all too much for you to take in, don't worry. We've got it all figured out. By the time you're a teenager, it'll be GMO a go go. We just need to make sure that our army of lobbyists keep GMO labeling off any products. Why spoil consumers with unnecessary choices after all? And if old farmer Joe decides to fight us, we have a ready made network waiting to take care of him. Can you say revolving door? Yep. Some judges used to be lawyers who worked for us, and we make sure that they take care of business. And legislation? No problem either. Former GM industry lawyers also work for the food regulation bodies, and we have enough cash in our pockets to lobby any issues all the way to Saturn and back. Some people still think government food regulatory bodies are serving their needs. Hilarious. We are making a killing in India. Literally, hundreds of thousands of farmers have been organically recycled to dodge debts that they owe us. BT cotton doesn't always give strong yields, and bullworm, cotton's main pest, seems to be gaining resistance to our transgenic BT cotton. This can mean bad crops and no revenue for some. We say once you're in, you're in. However, under Indian law, any debts die with the farmers. So farmer suicides stop debts being passed on to any remaining family. But I'm confident that we can lobby that issue too. When we own all of the cotton varieties, and we will, suicides will be of little concern because we'll be the only cotton seed suppliers. Duh. Concerns have been raised in Europe over problems with GMO pig feet causing sterilization and growth problems, but we have years of marketing left before that's proved, and we'll find a way to work with the Danish pig farmer's banging bath drum. So eat up your veggies, Johnny. There's going to be plenty for everyone for the right price.
ValerieAnne1970
Posted - January 11, 2026 at 11:38 AM
Saved - January 11, 2026 at 2:53 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m reporting a claim that Bayer’s Glyphosate‑Free Roundup swaps glyphosate for diquat, a neurotoxin allegedly linked to cancer and a 126% Parkinson’s risk rise. It outlines kidney failure, digestive burns, microbiome destruction, lung damage, brain injury, liver stress, heart and muscle harm, and warns proximity to treated areas raises risk. It highlights US bill AB‑453, the Pesticide Shield Act, as shielding Bayer from lawsuits, with a 2026 showdown.

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

🚨Shocking update on Bayer's "Glyphosate-Free" Roundup—it's now loaded with DIQUAT, 200X MORE poisonous! After acquiring Monsanto & facing massive lawsuits over Roundup's original formula, Bayer swapped out glyphosate for DIQUAT, touting it as a safer option for gardens & yards. But the truth? Diquat is a deadly neurotoxin linked to cancer & it boosts Parkinson's risk by 126% in people & animals. Already outlawed in several nations for triggering widespread organ damage, DIQUAT wreaks havoc through oxidative stress. Here's the breakdown of its brutal effects: - Kidneys: Primary victim—builds up and destroys tubules, leading to total failure and often death in severe cases. - Digestive System: Burns and inflames the mouth, throat, and stomach right away. - Gut Health: Ruins the microbiome by wiping out good bacteria like Lactobacillus, sparking inflammation and worsening toxicity everywhere. - Lungs: Triggers swelling, failure, and even scarring. - Brain & Nerves: Causes confusion, seizures, coma, and permanent damage—living near treated areas hikes Parkinson's by 126%. - Liver: Overwhelms with stress, causing inflammation and dysfunction. - Heart: Damages muscle tissue, leading to collapse and necrosis. - Muscles: Breaks down tissue, releasing toxins that hammer the kidneys further. And now, the US bill AB-453—dubbed the "Pesticide Shield Act"—is pushing for full legal protection for companies like Bayer/Monsanto. It blocks extra warnings, kills lawsuits for hidden dangers & strips rights from victims. Already through initial votes, it's set for a decisive 2026 showdown, thanks to heavy industry lobbying. And now, the US bill AB-453—dubbed the "Pesticide Shield Act"—is pushing for full legal protection for companies like Bayer/Monsanto. It blocks extra warnings, kills lawsuits for hidden dangers, and strips rights from victims. Already through initial votes, it's set for a decisive 2026 showdown, thanks to heavy industry lobbying. This is about more than weeds—it's our health on the line! Spread the word if you're outraged.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Bayer has removed glyphosate from Roundup weed killer, and according to the speaker, this is presented as good news only to reveal a new toxic lineup being sprayed in homes and public spaces. The speaker notes that all of these ingredients are horrible, with special emphasis on Dequat dibromide, which is stated as not only banned in the European Union but also more toxic than glyphosate and capable of damaging the gut, kidneys, liver, and nervous system. Despite these warnings, the speaker asserts that this mixture is still being sprayed. The message is that the problem with Roundup isn’t that it’s fixed, but that it’s not fixed at all—the product has not been made safe; instead, it has been rebranded, swapping one toxic chemical for four others, and the public is being led to believe it is safe. In addition to the product changes, the speaker highlights a legislative development: AB 453. This bill is described as shielding pesticide companies from liability in court, even if their chemicals cause harm. The speaker asserts that this reduces accountability and results in more toxins being sprayed near families. The overall claim is that Bayer did not make Roundup safer by removing glyphosate; rather, they replaced it with a new set of toxic ingredients, and now a state bill would protect manufacturers from legal consequences related to any harm caused by these chemicals.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In case you haven't heard, Bayer removed glyphosate from Roundup weed killer. Sounds like good news. Right? Until you see what they replaced it with. Here is the new toxic lineup that they are spraying in your yards, your parks, your schools, your golf courses, and in your neighborhoods. All of these ingredients are horrible especially Dequat dibromide which is not only banned in the European Union, more toxic than glyphosate, but damages your gut, your kidneys, your liver and your nervous system yet we're still allowing this to be sprayed. They didn't fix roundup they just rebranded the poison and switched one toxic chemical for four and they want you to believe that it's safe. And now here's the worst part They're now pushing through AB four fifty three, a bill that shields pesticides companies from being liable in court even if their chemicals cause you harm. So that means less accountability and more toxins being sprayed near your family.
View Full Interactive Feed