reSee.it - Related Post Feed

Saved - April 26, 2023 at 10:11 PM

@its_the_Dr - Johnny Midnight ⚡️

Lolol! Looks like he opened a big can of Whoop ass on the Media! https://t.co/2aD3vJeIK6

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker expresses frustration with the media's lack of coverage on important topics such as the Nord Stream and Seymour Hersh. They criticize the media's track record on reporting accurately, mentioning Iraq, Syria, and Russia as examples. The speaker also mentions Julian Assange and Tucker Carlson, praising them for speaking the truth and being critical of war. They call for the media to acknowledge the potential for World War III and the imprisonment of individuals critical of the war. The speaker concludes by stating that the mainstream media is losing credibility and only appeals to a small elite audience.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I I just I'm looking for the one with Seymour Hersh because it's a policy and press hall event. So shouldn't we be talking about the Nord Stream since that's the biggest story of the century, and you guys, you know I mean, you have the executive editor of the New York Times there who came out with a phony story to try and block Seymour Hersch. It's just it's just kind of funny how that happened, you know. I mean, did you even acknowledge Seymour Hersh? All of you are executive editors of papers that broke Pentagon, Mi Lai Watergate. Is this the same papers or not? I mean, is there anything you've gotten right in the last 20 years? Or am I mistaken about that? I mean, it's just kinda funny because Iraq, wrong. Syria? Wrong. Russia gave really wrong. Okay. I mean, the list goes on and on. So the last thing you could do To try and actually fix your reputation is acknowledge that through leaks, we had to find out that Zelensky was going to bomb Moscow on the anniversary? I mean, if you're so impartial, shouldn't you at least say, right, that Zelensky was going to bring us on the Spurs of World War 3? That seems pretty fair. While Julian Assange runs in prison, all of you got, you know, fat checks Because he's in jail for doing your job. And you know what? Tucker Carlson ain't no Seymour hurt, but he did something you guys are scared to do, speak the truth and actually be critical of the of the war, which is why he was actually fired from Fox because you are all okay. Every single one of you. None of you have actually had any relevancy. And you know what? The mainstream price is now dying. Nobody's ever gonna listen to you again. You have no credibility with the public. The only people who care about what you have to say are Elite apples who have nothing productive to say anymore, and it's dying off. So will you at least say something either about Nord Stream or Ukraine or the fact that Zelensky brought us to the verge of World War 3, and the only reason we knew about that was through leaks? Go ahead. It's a free speech event. Right? You guys are the best. Let's say something here. Mister Khan, come on. You know? You're the executive head of the New York Times. You know? I'm just trying to get into some good trouble here, man. Oh, listen, Karen. Get out of my face For a second. I gotta talk to these gentlemen. You gotta move. Yeah. Well, I just wanna hear what they have to say. Go ahead. I'm done. Wait return. You know what I'm talking to you. Come. Wait return. You could you could project if we can. Yeah. So thank you. Alright. I do think that we need to give, We're on the verge of World War III. Say something about this bombing. We blew up the Nord Stream pipeline. Listen. Don't stand there while there are people riding in prison. Nobody said anything about Uhuru. Right? The socialites who are in jail for being critical of this war?
Saved - May 11, 2023 at 9:16 PM

@DixiDarlen - 🏝️🇺🇸🏖️Dixie ♥️s America & Trump🏖️🇺🇸🏝️

💥No one, I mean no one, communicates with a crowd like the Boss, Donald J. Trump🇺🇸🦅🇺🇸 https://t.co/LklNg5fNhR

Saved - June 12, 2023 at 6:34 PM

@WojPawelczyk - Wojciech Pawelczyk

Trump has always been a man of the people https://t.co/fh0nmHLpKi

Video Transcript AI Summary
Trump's popularity among blue-collar workers is evident as he interacts with them while building his new skyscraper. They appreciate his demeanor and nickname, "the Don."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: No. Get off, fellas. Come on, baby. I know, man. How you know, fellas? It should not be surprising that Trump has some popularity with the kind of people building his newest skyscraper. Blue collar working men. They enjoy the Donald acting like the Don.
Saved - July 10, 2024 at 5:14 PM

@ricwe123 - Richard

The former mayor of the German city of Hamburg nails it.... 💯🎯 https://t.co/3qMi7aXhGS

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker: Discussing the future of Ukraine, Putin requested written plans from the Americans, but Biden refused to negotiate. This should have sparked concern in Germany, as a potential war would involve them. If conflict arises as the Americans warned, Germany will be drawn into the issue.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Wir werden jetzt, nachdem wir sehen, dass Sie's offenbar ernst machen, werden wir über die Zukunft der Ukraine mit Ihnen reden. Das hatte er ja ausdrücklich verweigert. Er hatte ja Putin hatte ja im Dezember zweitausendundeinundzwanzig an die Amerikaner geschrieben, ich brauche es diesmal schriftlich. Ich möchte schriftlich von ihnen wissen, wie wir mit der Ukraine in Zukunft umgehen wollen. Und daraufhin hat Präsident Biden gesagt, über diese Frage werden wir mit ihnen gar nicht verhandeln. Und als das passierte, sag ich mal, da hätte es in einen wirklich einen Aufstand auf deutscher Seite geben müssen und sagen müssen, das kann doch nicht wahr sein, Denn wenn es jetzt wirklich zu einem Krieg führt, wie ihr selber gesagt habt, ihr Amerikaner, dann führt das natürlich auch Deutschland mitten in diese Problematik.
Saved - September 23, 2023 at 5:29 PM

@TheChiefNerd - Chief Nerd

I can’t believe these @washingtonpost smear artists can still call themselves “journalists”

@stoolpresidente - Dave Portnoy

I Caught Wind That The Washington Post Was Writing A Hit Piece About Me And My Pizzafest So I Did What I Do. I Went on the Offensive

Video Transcript AI Summary
Dave Portnoy calls Emily to discuss an email she sent to sponsors of a pizza festival, accusing him of misogynistic and racist behavior. Emily claims she wanted to engage in a dialogue and get a response from the sponsors. Dave disagrees with her approach and questions her intentions, suspecting a hit piece. Emily insists she hasn't made up her mind about him and wants to have a full conversation. Dave expresses skepticism and requests to see the article before proceeding. They agree to talk the next day, but Dave remains cautious and plans to do more research on Emily.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is Emily. Speaker 1: Hey, Emily. This is Dave Portnoy calling. I'm recording you right now, but I've noticed a bunch of people you're it seems like you're sending we have this pizza fest happening on Saturday, and you're reaching out to our advertisers, and you're basically sending an email that says, to the effect. Dave's a misogynic racist. Do you wanna defend yourselves advertising at this event? Right? Speaker 0: I'm sorry. What's your name, Dave? I'm sorry. Who are you? Speaker 1: I'm the guy you're writing the article about, Dave Portnoy. Speaker 0: Oh, you're Dave Portnoy. Oh, hey. How are you? Speaker 1: Good. Speaker 0: Good. No. I'm not I'm not I haven't said anything like that. Speaker 1: I'm Well, I I can I can read if you want If you want, I can read what you actually sent? I have it. Speaker 0: Yeah. Yeah. Read because I I sent a bunch of notes, so I wanna make sure I know which one. Speaker 1: Okay. We are planning to write about the festival and how and how some of the sponsors and participants have drawn criticism by seemingly to associate themselves with Dave Portnoy, who has a history of misgenic comments and other problematic behavior. I wanna make sure that blank had a chance to respond this since the company is the most prominent, and they're partners of this festival. Speaker 0: Oh, that's the one I sent to which was definitely the most pointed of them because I really did want them to respond, and I was hoping to get something from them. Do you Speaker 1: think that's fair? Like, I I totally disagree with the assertions of what you said, the misogenic and all that stuff. So, like, it kinda backs people into a corner. So I'm happy to go over anything. I mean, you have That is pretty pointed. You said you didn't do it, then I have the exact evidence of you doing it. Speaker 0: So Well, I didn't say I didn't do that. I said I did. That was the one that was the most Speaker 1: well, no. You you that one before I before I provided proof, you said you didn't really remember doing that. And then I read it to you, and you're like, oh, yeah. I did it that one time. So you did do it. I'm happy to talk about the comments because to me, it's kinda like Porter's interference. Like, we're doing an event. Everyone's happy about the event. You know, I've raised 50,000,000 for small business. I've helped pizza. None of that. It's Dave is misogynic and problematic, and I'm happy to talk about it because to me, Nobody would like if someone's going around sending that email to their sponsors. And, again, you're not, like, questioning. You you're it's almost like a statement of fact. This is what I am. Speaker 0: Yeah. So, I do wanna talk to you about this, and I just want you to know that The story I'm working on, I'm working on with a colleague, and I want to kinda loop him on this because we did wanna talk to you real quick. Speaker 1: When were you gonna reach out? Speaker 0: We are planning to do it tomorrow morning, but, Speaker 1: So you're gonna write the article and then give me like, I've had that a bunch. People write a whole article and then give me the points after. Speaker 0: No. We're doing a bunch of reporting, and we wanted to make sure that when we finally did talk to you, we could really kind of present what you know, or Talk about things more fully based on Speaker 1: Like what? Like, it sounds like you have your opinion made of me based on that email. Uh-huh. So then how if you don't have your opinion made of me, how do you say in an intro email, Dave Portnoy has a history of misogynic comments and other problematic behavior? That's how you introduce the email. Speaker 0: Yeah. So, look, I just want you to know that this is not I I wanna talk to you about this, but, Speaker 1: I think you should talk to me before sending that email? Speaker 0: What I wanted to do is I wanted to talk to you when we had we wanna have some specific questions for you. And so I wanted to kinda have the full idea of what we Speaker 1: That's not a full idea. Like, you the anybody who's rationally reading that email being sent to an advertiser would have to be like, this is a hit piece, and you have your mind made up. Why else would you put? No. You but you you call me in the intro. I'll say it again. Dave Portnoy has a history of misogenic comments and other problematic behavior. You didn't say Dave Portnoy raised 50,000,000 for small business. Dave Portnoy saved thousands of pizza places. You didn't match. You said it in a way that is putting sponsors on the defensive. Speaker 0: So what I'm worried about when we contact you, I was worried that we would have sort of 1 shot To talk to you. Right? And so what I wanted to do is make everything we were gonna that we wanted to talk to you about before I reached out to you. That's why that's why I was waiting to call you. Speaker 1: Because you wanted to have everything together before you talk to me. I gotta be honest. This sounds like something who's gonna hit me in the last 2nd, be, like, comments and all this negative stuff. Speaker 0: No. This is, like, this is of standard journalistic stuff. Like, we Speaker 1: Unfortunately, yes. Talk about stuff. I have been an open book and willing to sit down with anybody at any time. And this all stems, by the way, from a guy who wrote an article that for 13 years, years has been tweeting negatively about me because he doesn't like me. So half the stuff he talks about didn't even exist. The guy doesn't like me, and now you're gonna run with this on the Washington Post. And anybody who's listening to this to think you were gonna give me a fair chance when you're leading to our sponsors before you talk to me is crazy. Speaker 0: Okay. Can we set up a time to talk tomorrow? Would that be okay? Like, I wanna talk to you. I really do. I just wanna make sure, like, I've got all my questions ready and stuff to talk to you about. Would that be okay? Can we set up a time? Speaker 1: I wanna see the article before you do it. Speaker 0: No. It's not really we can't do that. Speaker 1: Why can't you do why can't you do that? Because all I do when I is I validate all the stuff you're about to make up against me. I have been hit with the same things over and over, and they're all so wildly out of context. It's insane to say at this point in the game, when you've already written to the sponsors, let me say it again. Dave Portnoy has a history of misgenic comments in other problematic behavior. I catch you off guard on a phone call, and now you're like, no. We planned on talking to you tomorrow. Like, The Washington Post, which is a wildly left leaning publication. You have things you've said. You hate Trump. You hate Elon. Not that I'm those people. To think you're gonna give me a fair shake, I wasn't born yesterday. Speaker 0: I mean, I was gonna I wanted to talk to you and as part of my reporting. Like, we haven't written this story. We won't have written it by the time we talk to you. Like, this is talking to you, I would hope, is gonna be a big part of our reporting and and a big part of the story. So I'm really hoping I do that, but I want to give you a chance if we're gonna, you know, anything specific we're gonna include in a story. But I just don't have it all in front of me because I'm working with another reporter, and I want to make sure that we, you know, have this full Conversationist. We can have Speaker 1: What was the thesis of this article you're writing? Speaker 0: I don't know what the thesis is. I'm just reporting. It's just, you know, it's just you're an interesting guy. This you have an interesting role in this industry, and we just wanna look at it. That's all. Speaker 1: It seemed like you were going to try to shame sponsors for being associated with me and put them in a box when I know they all love me, but nobody wants the Washington Post writing an article sponsor associated with misogynic, you know, racist piece of shit. Nobody wants that. You that's what you're trying to do. And even on this call, it's pretty clear that's what you were trying to do. You don't have the facts for me. Speaker 0: What I might have sent on this call that would give you that impression? My all I've said on this call Speaker 1: Well, we started the call we started the call with you saying you never sending anything negative and then I read back an email like, oh, I did on that one. Speaker 0: I said that I sent a number of emails And that one was the most pointed because I was really trying to press them to respond. But I I I really and what I've been and what I've been asking people about, I'm just asking people what they're doing. Just asking people about, you know, how they seem to participate and how they view it. That's Speaker 1: Now but you could have just as easily said, what's your involvement? Are you proud to be involved with somebody who has done so much for the pizza and service industry? Right? That could have been an email. Speaker 0: Can we set up a time tomorrow to talk? I mean, really, I I wanna I wanna get into all of it. Speaker 1: Well, I don't know if I trust you yet. So I I'd want more I wanna see everything that you've been asking these people. Like, again, I don't think there's any the generally why I don't do this at the last minute is because if you really wanted to get my perspective. It wouldn't be me calling you. You would have already reached out to me in a fair manner. Speaker 0: Hey. Speaker 1: Hey. Sorry about that. I got, like, a call that came in in the middle of it. Speaker 0: Oh, no worries. Okay. So I was just saying I was gonna call you. I really wanted to talk with you. I wanna have a really full conversation. That's why. So can what time Speaker 1: I'm I'm more than willing to have an open conversation about anything if the article is not written. I'm afraid with what I'm seeing already here, All it does is it validates a hit piece. Speaker 0: I swear. I have not written have not written a story. Believe me. Speaker 1: Have you made your mind up about me? Speaker 0: We're we're in the reporting phase. I just don't you know, I can't for me to say, and I'm also I'm working with somebody else. Speaker 1: But that seems like a pretty straightforward question that have you made your mind up about me? If you can't answer that, no. Speaker 0: I can say I have not made my mind up about you. Speaker 1: Then why would you include that in the in the email to sponsors? Speaker 0: Because I was hoping for a dialogue with them. You know, sometimes you have to say something like this is like you know, it's sort of a reporting tactic when you want someone to respond. You kind of have to indicate that there might be something negative And then you get them to engage. That's all I was trying to do. I really wanted them to engage with me. Speaker 1: That is a engage. Bad state of journalism if that's a tactic that you have to what I would say is make up something about somebody. Understand that Speaker 0: there might be some there might be something negative, and so you wanna give people a chance to respond and have a conversation with you. That's What I was trying to do. Speaker 1: But at the same time, you're saying you don't know that that's actually truth, so you're you're leading with something that you haven't done enough research to know if it's valid. Speaker 0: I'm saying I'm saying there might be a bolder picture, and that's what I wanna talk to you about. And I wanna set up a time tomorrow morning, maybe, Like, 10? Are you free at 10? Speaker 1: I gotta do more research on you. I I still don't have the vibe that you're, like, that you're going to give me any sort of fair shake. Speaker 0: Okay. Well, that's fair. I can tell you and let me tell you the name if you wanna, like, you wanna look into me, you wanna My colleague, that I'm working with on the story, his name is Tim Carmen. He's also a food reporter at the Post. And it I'd love for both of us to be on the call and just, You know, we can talk. I am happy to, you know I I would definitely want some on the record stuff, but if there's stuff you wanna tell me, do you wanna tell me on around or off the record. We can talk about all Speaker 1: No. I'm always on the record. There's nothing I would ever say that is off the record. Speaker 0: I like that. I like that a lot. Okay. So, maybe, when would I say, tentatively 10 o'clock tomorrow? Speaker 1: Yes. I'll confirm tentatively. Now the one thing I'd always ask, just like this is being recorded, I would record the interview tomorrow. Speaker 0: I didn't have a chance I didn't have a chance to hit record. So I didn't I'm not reporting this call, but I get that you are. That's totally fine. I always anticipate that, You know, what I'm saying is gonna be recorded or be used. I get that. Speaker 1: Okay. So that that is a good step in establishing some degree of trust. So if you're fine with me recording tomorrow, then let's do, 10 AM tomorrow. Speaker 0: Okay. Do you wanna call me on this number? Speaker 1: Sure. Yes. Speaker 0: Okay. Okay. Great. Speaker 1: Alright. Speaker 0: Alright. We'll talk tomorrow, Jeff. Speaker 1: Okay. Sounds good. Speaker 0: Okay. Thank you.
Saved - October 21, 2023 at 5:22 PM

@TakingoutTrash7 - CtrlAltDelete

He doesn’t mince his words does he… https://t.co/7Ybq0Ohsk9

Saved - October 22, 2023 at 8:27 AM

@Prolotario1 - Ariel

"Look at our one and only world-renowned, beautifully enchanted, talented, and gifted Marilyn Monroe. No, wait... is that Rudy Giuliani?" https://t.co/8w8sKtndoh

Saved - November 13, 2023 at 4:12 PM

@orwell2022 - Orwell2024🏒

Once upon a time, the media (even CNN) still knew how to do its job. https://t.co/orLBQiXqH9

Video Transcript AI Summary
Pfizer, a company too big to fail, made a deal with the government to avoid being excluded from Medicare and Medicaid. They created a shell company, Pharmacia and Upjohn Company Incorporated, to take the blame for any convictions. This allowed Pfizer to continue doing business with the federal government. Despite paying a $1.2 billion criminal fine and settling civil suits for $1 billion, Pfizer's punishment may not be enough to deter other big pharma companies from engaging in illegal activities. The fear is that dealing with the Department of Justice is just seen as a cost of doing business.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Just as giant banks on Wall Street were considered too big to fail, Pfizer was considered too big to nail. Why? Because a company convicted of major fraud would automatically be kicked out of Medicare and Medicaid. Pfizer would no longer be allowed to bill any federal health programs for any of its products. It would be a corporate death sentence. Speaker 1: If a company like Pfizer ex is excluded from Medicare and Medicaid, they're out of business. Speaker 0: Lewis Morris, a top lawyer at the Department of Health and Human Services, told us Pfizer's collapse could leave 1,000 out of work, Millions not getting their medications. Speaker 1: We have to ask whether by excluding the company, are we harming our patients? Are we harming the beneficiaries who need these critical drugs? Speaker 0: Since shutting down Pfizer was unthinkable, Pfizer and the feds cut a deal. And here's how they did it. Pfizer, located here in New York, owns a company named Pharmacia Corporation, which owns another company called Pharmacia and Upjohn LLC, which owns Pharmacia and Upjohn Company LLC, which in turn owns Pharmacia and Upjohn Company Incorporated. And what does Pharmacia and Upjohn Company Incorporated do? Nothing. It's a shell created to be a legal shield for Pfizer. In other words, if Pfizer was at risk of being convicted, The Shell company would take the hit. Think of it as the great great grandson of the parent company. Birthday, March 27, 2007, just in time to plead guilty in a kickback case Against the company Pfizer had acquired a few years earlier. With that conviction, Pharmacia and Upjohn Company Incorporated, Which had never sold so much as a single pill was excluded from Medicare. 2 years later, When Pfizer was in trouble with Bextra, Pharmacia and Upjohn Company Incorporated, the Shell company, stepped up again and pleaded guilty. It was like having an imaginary friend, an imaginary bad guy to take the rap. And Pfizer, too big to nail, is still doing business with the federal government. Speaker 1: It is true that if a company is created, to take a criminal plea, but it's just a shell. The impact of an exclusion is minimal or nonexistent. Speaker 0: Did the punishment fit the crime? Pfizer says yes. It paid nearly $1,200,000,000 in a criminal fine for Bextra, the largest Fine ever. It paid $1,000,000,000 more to settle civil suits, although it denies wrongdoing on allegations it illegally promoted 12 other drugs. In all, Pfizer lost the equivalent of 3 months profit. But even Mike Lautz, who spent more than a decade prosecuting some of the largest Drug companies in the country isn't sure that $2,000,000,000 is enough to make big pharma clean up its act. Speaker 2: I worry that the incentives are so great, the money is so great, that that has, maybe made Dealing with us, the Department of Justice, is just a cost of doing business.
Saved - January 10, 2024 at 6:35 AM

@WylieGuide - 🇺🇸 Rich Howard 🇺🇸

CITIZEN FREE PRESS Mobster Sammy the Bull Gravano says Donald Trump is incorruptible. “I tried to get to him. He just wouldn’t bite” https://t.co/GWLUWG5oT1

Video Transcript AI Summary
I tried to approach Trump multiple times to work with him, but he always had ex-FBI agents surrounding him. Despite my attempts, he never showed any interest in collaborating. There were layers of people in between us, making it impossible to reach him. One of my colleagues suggested going to his office, but we feared we would be arrested since everyone around him was an ex-FBI agent. In the end, it was clear that Trump was not interested in pursuing such opportunities.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You actually try to press up on Trump, but you could never get to him? Yeah. Because he had ex FBI agents all around him? Speaker 1: All the time. And I tried a couple times to press him and make arrangements where I could work with him and And I'm with him. I did that with other big contractors. I had the power of the unions. I could do all kinds of little things, But I couldn't get to him. He wouldn't bite. He just wouldn't bite. He he didn't wanna do anything like that, and there was layers of people in the middle. One of my guys said, we'll go up to the office. I said, we'll go up to the office. Everybody around him is an ex FBI agent. We'll go up the office, we'll get cuffed, And we'll go right to prison. So forget about Trump. He's a legitimate guy. He don't wanna do it. Forget about Trump.
Saved - April 19, 2024 at 1:50 PM

@JakeCan72 - Jake

🇺🇸Brandon Straka Dear liberals, whatever offends you about Donald Trump, the media is 1000 x worse. https://t.co/4x6B3v4Juv

Video Transcript AI Summary
I used to trust the liberal media until Trump won in 2016. I was shocked and angry. Then, I saw a video showing Trump mocking a disabled reporter. It turned out to be edited to make him look bad. The media often manipulates emotions to control thoughts.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Never in my life did it occur to me to question the ethics or motivations of the liberal media. To me, they were just the good guys. In 2016, I voted for Hillary Clinton. When Trump won the election, I was confused and outraged. How could half the country support someone so unfit, so unsound, and so morally objectionable? In January of 2017, I bitterly proclaimed on social media, I would never be able to understand how anyone could vote for a man who stood before a cheering crowd and mocked a reporter's disability. And that's when somebody sent me this. I mentioned the word regulated. What do you think about ISIS? Oh, ISIS is very tough. They said, Senator Cruz, what do you think of waterboarding? I don't wanna talk about it. You know, he didn't he didn't wanna talk about waterboarding. Written by a nice report, and now the poor guy, you gotta see this guy. I don't know what I said. I don't remember. Doing a comical imitation of somebody getting flustered after being called out for being dishonest and mocking someone's disability is a very important distinction. To intentionally mislead the public into believing something terrible and sinister took place, something that strikes a blow straight into the heart of what we consider to be common civility and the basic standards of decency is reprehensible to purposely invoke racism, homophobia, bigotry, and falsely assign these emotionally charged accusations to people in situations where they do not belong simply to control your thinking is criminal. And it turns out, they do it all the time. The media is keenly aware of a simple premise. If they can control how you feel, they can control how you think.
Saved - August 1, 2024 at 1:50 PM

@StaciBryant133 - Staci Bryant

@thevivafrei Donald Trump has done more to expose “journalists” than any other human being on this earth. And oh my God, they hate him so much for it. People are really starting to understand worldwide that they are contemptible zombie NPC’s. And once you see, you can never go to sleep again. https://t.co/XbvuPT0hsB

Video Transcript AI Summary
Media outlets have made numerous errors in reporting during the Trump era. Examples include false claims about Nancy Sinatra, Martin Luther King Jr.'s bust, Black History Month, Trump's immigration order, contacts with Russian officials, and more. Misinformation spread by CNN, The New York Times, NBC News, and others has been debunked. Errors range from misquoting sources to misrepresenting events. The media has also been criticized for misleading reports on Trump's interactions with foreign leaders and financial records. Trust in the media has declined, with inaccurate stories about taxes, immigration, and more contributing to public skepticism.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Trend of major media mistakes in the era of Trump forming a disturbing pattern. And now the president and first lady of the United States will take their first dance. The tone was set on president Trump's first official day in office. CNN claimed Nancy Sinatra was not happy about her father Frank Sinatra's song my way being used at Trump's Nancy Sinatra responded on Twitter. That's not true. I never said that. Why do you lie, CNN? Actually, I'm wishing him the best. Meantime, time incorrectly reported that president Trump had removed the bus statue of Martin Luther King Junior from the oval office. That false news went viral. In February 2017, TMZ reported Trump had changed the name Black History Month to African American History Month, implying the change was racist. In fact, it turns out presidents Obama, George w Bush, and Clinton all called Black History Month African American History Month. Also, the Washington Post reported on the cabinet battle over Trump's immigration order. The article was repeatedly updated to note that one of the reported meetings did not actually occur. A conference call did not happen as described in the article, and actions attributed to Trump were actually carried out by his chief of staff. And The New York Times reported on supposed contacts between Trump campaign staff and senior Russian intelligence officials. FBI director James Comey later testified it was not true. That report by The New York Times was not true. Is that a fair statement? Yeah. In the main, it was not true. In May, the BBC and The Guardian reported because Trump wasn't wearing headsets, he didn't bother to listen to the translation of a speech by Italy's prime minister. But Trump was wearing his earpiece in his right ear as always, said the White House. In June 2017, NBC News reported that Russian president Putin said he had compromising information about Trump. Actually, Putin said the opposite. Do you have something damaging on our president? Well, this is just another load of nonsense. Where would we get this information from? CNN and ABC falsely reported that FBI director Comey was going to refute Donald Trump's claim that Comey told Trump 3 times he wasn't under investigation. Instead, Comey confirmed Trump's claim under oath. It appears that you actually volunteered that insurance. Is that correct? That's correct. CNN retracted a report claiming congress was investigating a Russian investment fund with ties to Trump officials. Newsweek reported Poland's first lady refused to shake Trump's hand, but later acknowledged she did. CNN edited the video to make it appear as though Trump impatiently dumped a box of fish food into the water in Japan. The full video showed Trump had simply followed the lead of Japan's prime minister. Bloomberg and The Wall Street Journal falsely reported special counsel Robert Mueller had subpoenaed Trump's bank records. AP reported a new survey showed trust in the media had fallen during the Trump presidency, but the survey was actually conducted under president Obama. The New York Times said a hypothetical family's tax bill would rise nearly $4,000 under Trump's tax plan, it turns out their taxes would actually go down $43. The New York Times and CNN shared a story with photos of immigrant children in cages. It turns out the photos were from 2014 during the Obama
Saved - September 11, 2024 at 10:35 PM

@ImMeme0 - I Meme Therefore I Am 🇺🇸

You can’t hate the media enough! https://t.co/aQUCeg1bbK

Saved - September 22, 2024 at 11:48 PM

@JohnStossel - John Stossel

The media treat Republicans and Democrats differently. Probably because for every Republican in a newsroom, there are TEN Democrats. https://t.co/VVDMtLJtAP

Video Transcript AI Summary
The media treats Republicans differently, with examples including CNN cutting away from Trump's speech after the Iowa caucus and MSNBC showing none of it. Rachel Maddow said it's not responsible to broadcast Trump live because he lies so much. Both Trump and Biden lie, but the media focuses more on Republican lies. Newsrooms have ten times more Democrats than Republicans, and NPR's new CEO tweeted that Trump is a racist and defended looting during BLM. The media criticizes Texas for refusing to remove a fence after the feds told them to, but they don't criticize sanctuary cities for not following federal immigration laws. Argentina's new president, a libertarian, is labeled "far right" and "Trump-like" despite his policies differing from Trump's. When he threatened to cut welfare benefits for protesters blocking streets, the protests stopped. More people are ignoring leftist media and getting their news from independent journalists on platforms like Substack and YouTube.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Have you noticed how some in the media just suck up to some politicians? Speaker 1: I'm struck just in your presence. Speaker 0: Struck in her presence. Speaker 1: Looking you in the eye with your passion that you are displaying. Speaker 0: Republicans are treated differently. Speaker 1: If if Speaker 0: let me finish this answer, because this is this is really important. I'm gonna Speaker 1: go ahead and interrupt you here. On the deal, Kaye. With that, sir. Let's just just just my question, though, governor. Excuse me. Speaker 0: Aggressive interviews are easy to notice, but some bias is more subtle. For example What a great campaign. The media have always covered Iowa caucus victory speeches. Speaker 1: We're gonna wanna listen in very, very closely. Thank you, Iowa. Speaker 0: But this year, when Trump won Speaker 1: Thank you. We love you all. Speaker 0: CNN cut away from his speech. Speaker 1: Here he is right now under under my voice. You hear him repeating his anti immigrant rhetoric. Speaker 0: Actually, no, Jake. You hear him. We don't. CNN wouldn't let us actually listen to Trump and decide for ourselves. MSNBC showed none of Trump's speech. Rachel Maddow said We will let you know if there's any news made. Maddow says it's not responsible to broadcast Trump live because he lies so much. But we reporters can point that out instead of cutting away when he talks. I've repeatedly reported on Trump's lies. Trump lies even about unimportant things like the crowd at his inauguration, the ratings of his TV show, but Biden lies too. Here he lies about doing well in law school. Speaker 1: Ended up in the top half of my class. Biden now concedes he did not graduate in the top half of his law school class. Speaker 0: He also lied when he said Speaker 2: I have never discussed with my son or my brother or anyone else anything having to do with their businesses, period. Speaker 0: I shouldn't be surprised that the media treat Republicans differently. For every Republican in newsrooms, there are ten Democrats. And now NPR has actually hired this woman to be its new CEO. She not only tweeted, Trump's a racist. But during BLM, looting said, sure, looting is counterproductive, but it's fine because what they're looting comes from a system of oppression. She's now the boss of government funded radio? Yes. Here's another example. Speaker 1: The governor of Texas refuses to give in to federal law. Speaker 0: Recently, reporters suddenly got very upset about rule of law. Speaker 1: The governor of Texas refuses to give in to federal law. Speaker 0: The media can't believe that Texas politicians put up a fence and won't remove it even after the feds told them to. But when it comes to sanctuary cities, the tone is very different. Speaker 1: Communities that shield undocumented immigrants by not reporting offenses to immigration enforcement. Speaker 3: They choose not to follow federal immigration laws. Speaker 0: They simply choose not to follow the law. They don't refuse like Texas does. Speaker 1: The governor of Texas refuses to give in to federal law. Speaker 0: Finally, the way the media labels politicians is just biased. Argentina's new president is a libertarian who promises to take a chainsaw to big government, so the media call him far right. Far right radical. Speaker 1: Far right Javier Millet. Far right Javier Millet. Speaker 3: Far right libertarian Javier Millet. Speaker 0: At least she calls him libertarian, but libertarians aren't far right. Most of us support ending wars, free trade, gay marriage, and all sorts of things far from far right. The late supports legalizing the sale of human organs. Maybe you oppose organ markets, but it's not far right. Conservatives are more likely to oppose organ sales. The shallow media just label anyone who doesn't agree with them right wing. Speaker 1: Argentina elected a right wing former TV host. Speaker 0: Far right. Far right and Trump like. Speaker 1: Donald Trump of Argentina. Speaker 0: He makes Trump almost look like a conventional political candidate. Speaker 3: He is nothing like Trump. Speaker 0: Economist Daniel DiMartino points out that Malay's policies are very different from Trump's. Speaker 3: The only thing that's similar to Trump is that he went against the establishment. He's funny in his speeches. He's charismatic. He has crazy hair, but that's it. I mean, this is a guy who's for free trade. This is a guy with very set on principles, who's very smart on on economics. Speaker 0: The media eagerly cover protesters who oppose malaise cutting the size of government. Speaker 1: Thousands are attending demonstrations opposing his drastic cuts to public spending. Speaker 0: Media call most any budget cut drastic, slash and burn, astronomical, draconian. But at least in Argentina, the proposed cuts are big. A lot of people don't like this. Unions are protesting. Speaker 3: In Argentina, it's very popular to protest on block streets. Speaker 1: It's the second protest against him this month. Speaker 0: But president Malay did something different because some union members get welfare payments. Speaker 3: He said that anybody who blocks a street illegally will lose all welfare benefits. Guess what happened? No streets were blocked. Speaker 0: Who knew that protesters blocking streets could be stopped by threatening their government handouts? You won't hear it from the leftist media. Libertarians get trashed. Republicans get interrupted and their speeches cut off, but Democrats largely get a pass even if you can't tell what they say. Speaker 1: Beer brewed here. It is used Speaker 4: to make the brew beer in Speaker 1: this department. Oh, earth rider. Thanks for the great legs. Speaker 0: But there is some good news. Today, more people ignore leftist media. CNN's prime time viewership fell behind the history channels recently. More people now get their news from independent journalists who publish in places like Substack and YouTube like us. It's a good trend because we're more thoughtful than the silly people on TV. Speaker 1: Mister president, how do you do that? Chaka chaka chip. Oh, yeah.
Saved - September 23, 2024 at 8:20 PM

@amuse - @amuse

Rioters took over the streets of Philly last night, communists have taken them over today. Is everything okay Philadelphia? https://t.co/5Sm3xrZ2Eh

Saved - October 28, 2024 at 1:59 AM

@_johnnymaga - johnny maga

They took everything from Rudy. His apartments, his vehicles, his World Series rings, etc. But America's Mayor showed up in support of Trump anyway — in the city they used to run — for the president's historic comeback. God Bless Rudy Giuliani. https://t.co/DhzwfCer0G

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker states the gathering is in midtown Manhattan, at the most iconic venue in the United States. They claim it's a place Republicans are not supposed to come, which is why Donald Trump came. The speaker asserts there's no place in America the president shouldn't be able to come.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We gather here today in the middle of midtown Manhattan. This is the most iconic venue of venues in the United States. This is where this is where a Republican's not supposed to come, which is why Donald Trump came here. There's no place in America the president shouldn't be able to come.
Saved - October 30, 2024 at 6:21 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I addressed Mayor Matthew Tuerk's attempts to obstruct our rally in Allentown, accusing him of trying to flex his power by pulling permits. I confronted him directly, expressing my frustration over his last-minute changes after assuring us everything was fine. With the election just eight days away, I called out his actions as disingenuous, highlighting how he showed up in a suit with cameras, seemingly trying to make a statement at our expense.

@CollinRugg - Collin Rugg

NEW: Trump campaign member eviscerates Allentown, PA Mayor Matthew Tuerk, who was apparently trying to pull permits ahead of Trump's rally. Tuerk is accused of trying to "show how big & strong" he was by obstructing Trump's Allentown rally. "You are out of your f*cking mind. Don't ever pull that sh*t on me again," the Trump campaign member said. "You try to pull some fake sh*t on the permits. You told us on Saturday it was fine. You are trying to pull our permits?" "The election is 8 days away. You said we could close off this entire intersection, and then the day of you show up in a fresh suit with all your cameras trying to show how big and strong you are."

Video Transcript AI Summary
The city announced that the entire block is closed on Apple Maps, causing confusion among the police. There are food trucks present, and the speaker questions how this affects voting access. They express frustration over permit issues and the sudden enforcement of barricades. The speaker insists that the event is not obstructing voting and challenges the city officials to walk the area to see the situation. There’s a back-and-forth about traffic management and access points for voters. The speaker offers to show officials how people can still vote despite the closures, emphasizing the need for clear communication and cooperation to resolve the situation.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Oh, really? Yeah. You put out a press statement yesterday. The city did saying that this entire block was closed on Apple Maps. You know what it shows? It shows this entire intersection closed. Look it up. You didn't let them remove the barricades now? Yeah. You're out of your fucking mind. Don't ever pull that shit on me again. The entire police force was confused. Yeah. Go ahead and call your chief, please. Speaker 1: You you're Speaker 0: gonna open it up while the trucks Speaker 1: are right there too. Really? Speaker 0: We have food trucks right there. Is this us? How is this in the way of voting? Oh, oh, oh, so someone lives on that block right there. They can't walk around to the other side. Why don't you walk it with me? Let's walk. Oh, really? I'm a big problem? I'm not the one who lied to you the entire time. You tried to pull some fake shit on the permits. Oh, really? You're laughing? You told us Saturday was fine. And then you say we can't have our porta potties there? Really? Okay. Go ahead and fucking call them. You said you're trying to pull that permit shit on us? You told us we could do that. Oh, really? You gotta pull a permit now? Oh, okay. Yeah. Right. Come on now. Oh, really? Election is 8 days away. You said we could close-up this entire intersection. And then the day of you show up in a freshly in a fresh suit with all your cameras trying to show, like, you're big and strong that you can shut this down. Oh, yeah? Oh, yeah. Oh, why don't we walk it? Why don't we walk it right now? Let's go and walk it. What what are they? Arnold Schwarzenegger? They got a they don't have to do anything crazy. They'll walk on the outside of the fence. Get up right here. Oh, what's that on Twitter? The city of Allentown is advising residents and visitors to prepare for traffic and oh, it's on Twitter. Thought you were on Twitter. The event will be hosted at the PPL Center on Tuesday, October 29th and is set to start at 7 PM. PM. The city has announced 3 closures in the downtown area. 7th Street from Linden to Walnut and Hamilton Street from 6 to 8th Street will be closed starting at 5 PM on Monday. Speaker 1: Now That was what we released at 4 Speaker 0: Oh. Oh, okay. Really? You're gonna pull that shit on me? Really? Speaker 1: Shit, man. Speaker 0: I'm You won't. Let's walk it. Let please, let's walk it. Let's let's see how close the office is. You told me you can't access they can't access Moni? Just come here. Yes. I Speaker 1: would like to know how somebody is gonna come from Speaker 0: up there. Oh, okay. Please. I will show you. I I can solve this for Speaker 1: you right now. Speaker 0: Somebody literally I can solve this for you right now. Speaker 1: Beautiful. Okay. Yeah. Speaker 0: I'm a kid's secret service too. Speaker 1: So let me fucking tell you got here. Yeah. Speaker 0: You're trying to get people killed? Are you serious? Speaker 1: Where are Speaker 0: we gonna process all these people? Where? Where are we gonna process them? I don't do you not see entrance right there? We're not blocking off the voting booth, man. What are you talking about? This is ridiculous. He's just he's just trying. He's scared that we're gonna vote for Donald Trump on November 5th. That's what he's scared about. Speaker 1: I I haven't bought anybody Speaker 0: Oh oh, yeah. You would? Oh, you would. Really? That's very interesting. Speaker 1: Who is that true here, man? Speaker 0: Who are you talking about? Speaker 1: Who are you I'm talking about people who are used to expect to be able to drive Speaker 0: Oh, so like, the city would have to announce it would be closed. So this intersection would be closed. Speaker 1: It's closed. Yeah. Speaker 0: Oh, I need to tone it down. How about you stop lying? How about you stop lying? How about you don't order your police force to do something that would prevent us from processing people Speaker 1: to get into the event. Excuse me. Is that the guy who put my man in jeopardy? Yeah. Speaker 0: This is a man right now. Traffic? Yeah. He's trying to he's trying to open up the barricades again. Speaker 1: That's what I'm called for. Open anything. What do you what do you people. Speaker 0: How many times do I show you? Being very professional, Speaker 1: my man's life was put in state to see. Where? Who's who's call was it to open up traffic again? Speaker 0: It was his call. Speaker 1: Right. We opened traffic. We're not gonna put you into each other. How did you How? Do you see this? Basic This didn't land here by itself. This is not I've not seen this this Speaker 0: Oh, really? Because you drove you're rolling a bike around 7 times around our event and then you left. Speaker 1: Question for you. What can we do to make this situation better? What we're trying to do right now is make sure that people can have Oh. Speaker 0: Oh. I don't I don't under what what are you not seeing? What are you not seeing? I can show you where they can vote. Speaker 1: Somebody does vote. Where? Do Speaker 0: you understand? Do you under mister mayor, there are 4 other streets around here. There are 4 other streets around here. Speaker 1: Drive through. Oh, so so Right now, driving through Speaker 0: to do our Speaker 1: job. Listen. Wait. Also, it's gonna be impossible for people to drive and Speaker 0: Who's telling you to do this, dude? Been here for 5 Who is telling you Speaker 1: to do this? Speaker 0: This morning. Speaker 1: I've been here since 2004. Listen. Good. Good. Good. Speaker 0: What's in your water, dude? Speaker 1: I don't understand. 2004? I was doing my job so you could be over doing yours. Okay? Okay. But if you get to the point How k. Speaker 0: Let me let me let me get this straight. Let me get this straight. I just wanna ask you something real quick. Let me let me ask you something real quick. We're here to do a job. Speaker 1: What's going on? We're No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. Okay. Okay. Speaker 0: Please please tell me your plan. Tell me your plan. How we can adjust this? Speaker 1: I'm working with my my police chief right now to make sure people Oh, okay. Speaker 0: Great. So let me get this straight. Where do you no. Speaker 1: No. You're lying. What are you lying about? Speaker 0: We told you at 5 o'clock. Your city released a statement saying that this was gonna be closed off. Why on Apple Maps is this intersection closed off? Speaker 1: Apple Maps is not the real world. Oh, okay. Okay. Speaker 0: Okay. What is the real world for Speaker 1: getting this job done? Well, this question. So how do we get to a solution where people can people Speaker 0: Okay. How about you don't lie to us to start off with? Speaker 1: Where people who can who don't can I easily walk to a pool? Halbert, Speaker 0: let me show you. I can show you where they can access the pool. This is Speaker 1: a very long time. Speaker 0: No. Let me please, please, Please come. I will come and show you how they can vote. I will come and show I can show you right now how Speaker 1: they can vote. Time frame. Please Speaker 0: I I can I'll I'll I can Speaker 1: deal with this. Just keep going. Just keep going. I'm not here to build. I'm not gonna argue with either one of them. Speaker 0: I'm gonna take Speaker 1: care of this. Speaker 0: I can take care of this. I'll Speaker 1: have her go. Speaker 0: Go grab Hunter. Speaker 1: Chief of chief. Chiefs on the way down. Speaker 0: Oh, chief's on the way down. Speaker 1: Oh, okay. Big bad chief. Okay. Speaker 0: I'll go Speaker 1: get the secret service. We work closely with them. Speaker 0: Oh, you work closely with them. I'm sure you Speaker 1: We do. Speaker 0: Okay. I can show you where they can vote. Speaker 1: I can show you the path. How? Speaker 0: If you want, I can write it on the a chalk on Speaker 1: the sidewalk. Come over here. But I want to know how to do it. Okay. Speaker 0: I can show you. That's beautiful.
Saved - December 7, 2024 at 9:18 PM

@RepNancyMace - Rep. Nancy Mace

Is there anything the American people hate more than lying? https://t.co/xXum57oo4r

Video Transcript AI Summary
You're not being honest this morning, and it feels disrespectful to the American people. If congressional seats are based on the census, with about 750,000 people per seat, would that affect how seats are drawn? Yes or no? I'm sorry, could you slow down? No, I can't. The answer is yes.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You're not being honest this morning. I and I think it's a slap in the face to the American people. If a portion of congressional seats is based on the census and roughly 750,000 people pour congressional seat in this country, would that unfairly impact how congressional seats are drawn, yes or no? I'm sorry. You're speaking too fast for me. Can you slow down a little bit? No, I can't. The answer is yes.
Saved - January 21, 2025 at 11:24 PM

@RagingKuJo1222 - ⚔️ Silent Silas ⚔️

President Trump brilliantly outmaneuvered a reporter from a FAKE NEWS outlet who attempted to corner him regarding the January 6 hostages. https://t.co/1YUJqOlVCS

Video Transcript AI Summary
It's never acceptable to assault a police officer. Regarding DJ Rodriguez, who used a stun gun on an officer during the Capitol riot and later confessed, the question of his pardon arises. However, many murderers today go uncharged, particularly in cities like Philadelphia and LA. Those who have served time in harsh conditions deserve consideration. In places like Portland and Minneapolis, where violence occurred and no one was held accountable, the situation is troubling. I decided to grant pardons, similar to Joe Biden, who also pardoned numerous criminals. Questions should focus on his pardons, including those for his relatives and associates.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You would agree that it's never acceptable to a solid police officer. Speaker 1: Sure. Speaker 0: So then if I can, among those who pardon DJ Rodriguez, he drove a stun gun into the neck of a DC police officer who was abducted by the mob that day. He later confessed on video to the FBI and pleaded guilty for his crimes. Why does he deserve a pardon? Speaker 1: Well, I don't know. Was it a pardon? Because we're looking at commutes and we're looking at pardons. Okay. Well, we'll take a look at everything, but I can say this. Murderers today are not even charged. You have murderers that aren't charged all over. You take a look at what's going on in Philadelphia. You take a look at what's going off in LA, where people murder people and they don't get charged. These people have already served years in prison, and, and they've served them viciously. It's a disgusting prison. It's been horrible. It's inhumane. It's been a a terrible, terrible thing. I also say this. You go to Portland, where they did where they wrapped police officers, shot police officers. Nothing happened to anybody. You go to Seattle, where they took over a big chunk of the city and people died. Portland, a lot of people died. Wait a minute. And you go, also, take a look at, Minneapolis, because I was there, and I watched it. And if I didn't bring in the National Guard, that city wouldn't even exist today. People were killed, and nobody went to jail. So these people have already served a long period of time, and I made a decision to give a pardon. Joe Biden gave a pardon yesterday to a lot of criminals. These are criminals that he gave a pardon to, and you should be asking that question. Why did he give a pardon to all of these people that committed crimes? Why did he give a pardon to the, j 6 unselect committee when they burned and destroyed all documents which showed that they did what was wrong, not me. Wait a minute. Wait a minute. Why did they give a pardon to all of his relatives, his brother who made 1,000,000 of dollars to all these different people? He gave pardons. That's the question you should be answering. Alright. Go ahead. Yeah. Please. If I Speaker 0: if I can just follow-up really bad, you see if you Speaker 1: guys follow-up really bad. No. No. No. No. That's what I asked. Go ahead. You said
Saved - February 9, 2025 at 4:43 AM

@AtRealBen - Real Ben

I always wondered why Nixon was so hated; he knew 👇🏻 https://t.co/7WOz3Jv0gc

Video Transcript AI Summary
The provided transcript appears to contain a repetitive sequence of characters ("的 的 一 个 人 都 是 不 是 一 个 人 的 人 的 人"). It does not form a coherent sentence or convey a meaningful message. Therefore, a concise summary is not possible. A shorter version would simply be a repetition of a smaller portion of the original meaningless phrase.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: 的 的 一 个 人 都 是 不 是 一 个 人 的 人 的 人 都 是 不 是 一 个 人 的 人 的 人 都 是 不 是 一 个 人 的 人 的 人 都 是 不 是 一 个 人 的 人 的 人 的 人 都 是 不 是 一 个 人 的 人 的 人 的 人
Saved - February 21, 2025 at 4:56 PM

@DefiantLs - Defiant L’s

Old Trump commercials are hilarious. https://t.co/VuEGOC8GNq

Saved - March 12, 2025 at 8:59 PM

@Bubblebathgirl - Paul A. Szypula 🇺🇸

@CollinRugg Funniest POTUS ever. Want a real good laugh? Watch Trump roasting Rosie back in the day: https://t.co/yUegfFrdfK

Video Transcript AI Summary
Rosie O'Donnell is disgusting, inside and out. She's a slob who talks like a truck driver. I was happy when her talk show failed, and her magazine was a disaster. I like to see bad people fail, and Rosie's a disaster. She called me a snake oil salesman, which is pretty low coming from her. I don't understand how she even got on television. Barbara made a terrible mistake putting her on The View, and I'd fire her. Rosie is very unattractive, both inside and out, and lucky to have her girlfriend, who I could take away. She's trying to use The View to get even with me, but I fight back. I'll probably sue Rosie for saying I was bankrupt when I'm worth billions. I want to take money out of her fat ass pockets and think she's got deep-seated problems and should go to rehab. Rosie is a loser.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Rosie O'Donnell's disgusting. I mean, both inside and out. You take a look at her. She's a slob. She talks like a like a truck driver. Rosie attacked me personally because I was very happy when her talk show failed. The other thing that failed, and this was a real monster and everybody was suing her, was her magazine. Her magazine called Rosie was a total disaster. So I loved it. I gloat over it. I think it's wonderful because I like to see bad people fail. Rosie failed. I'm happy about it. She's basically a disaster. Well, she called me a snake oil salesman. And, you know, coming from Rosie, that's pretty low because when you look at her and when you see the mind, the mind is is weak. I don't see it. I don't get it. I never understood how does she even get on television. I believe Barbara made a terrible mistake putting her on, and I think Barbara's probably paying a big price. If I were running The View, I'd fire Rosie. I mean, I'd look her right in that fat ugly face of hers. I'd say, Rosie, you're fired. We're all a little chubby, but Rosie's just worse than most of us. But it's not the chubbiness. Rosie is a very unattractive person, both inside and out. Rosie's a person that's very lucky to have her girlfriend, and she better be careful or I'll send one of my friends over to pick up her girlfriend. Why would she stay with Rosie if she had another choice? She's trying to use ABC and The View to get even with me. But with me, we fight back. I'll probably sue Rosie because she doesn't tell the facts. As an example, I'm worth many billions of dollars. Now she said I was bankrupt. I never went bankrupt. So probably I'll sue her because it would be fun. I'd like to take some money out of her fat ass pockets. I actually think they ought to look at her whole life and see where she's coming from because I think she's got some very deep seated problems. Perhaps it should be Rosie that goes to rehab. Rosie is a loser.
Saved - April 14, 2025 at 8:25 PM

@NobodymrRobert - 🔨Robert The Builder 🇺🇸

TRUMP Really knows how to answer a question asked by fake news. https://t.co/SWc9eFP5Tk

Video Transcript AI Summary
An individual, a citizen of El Salvador, was illegally in the United States and was returned to his country of origin. The exception is Venezuela, which was refusing to take people back. The foreign policy of the United States is conducted by the president, not by a court. No court has a right to conduct foreign policy. The Supreme Court said no court has the authority to compel a foreign policy function. The administration won a case nine to zero, but CNN is portraying it as a loss because they want foreign terrorists in the country. President Trump's policy is that foreign terrorists who are here illegally get expelled. The president was asked why he doesn't just say it's wonderful that criminals are being kept out of the country.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Sick these are sick people. Was wondering if you have something to say. Yeah. I mean, Steve and I minded it. I don't understand what the confusion is. This individual is a citizen of El Salvador. He was illegally in The United States and was returned to this country. That's where you deport people back to their country of origin except except for Venezuela that wasn't refusing to take people back in places like that. I can tell you this, mister president. No. The foreign policy of The United States is conducted by the president of The United States, not by a court. And no court in The United States has a right to conduct a foreign policy of The United States. It's that simple. The court specifically said it couldn't be sent back to El Speaker 1: Salvador. Point. The supreme court said exactly what Marco said, that no court has the authority to compel a foreign policy function in United States. We want a case nine zero, and people like CNN are portraying it as a loss as usual because they want foreign terrorists in the country who kidnap women and children. But president Trump, his policy is foreign terrorists that are here illegally get expelled from the country, which by the way is a ninety ten issue. Speaker 0: Well, the president mister president, you said that if the supreme court said someone needed to be returned, that you would abide by that. You said that on your first one just a few days ago. And they said have to answer this question. Why don't you just say, isn't it wonderful that we're keeping criminals out of our country? Why can't you just say that? What's a legal Why do you go home and go home and go And that's why nobody watches you anymore. You know, you have no credibility.
Saved - May 6, 2025 at 4:32 AM

@MilaLovesJoe - Mila Joy

The mafia tried to get to Trump but they determined he was uncorruptable. That's my President. https://t.co/uivmKFyIWy

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker states they tried to pressure Trump and arrange to work with him, as they had with other contractors, leveraging the power of the unions. However, they couldn't reach Trump because he was surrounded by ex-FBI agents. The speaker claims Trump didn't want to engage in any illicit activities. An associate suggested going to Trump's office, but the speaker refused, believing they would be arrested due to the ex-FBI agents present. The speaker concludes that Trump is legitimate and not interested in such dealings.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Actually try to press up on Trump, but you could never get to him. Yeah. Because he had ex FBI agents all around him? All the time. And I tried a couple times to press him and make arrangements where I could work with him and and on with him. I did that with other big contractors. I had the power of the unions. I could do all kinds of little things, but I couldn't get to him. He wouldn't bite. He just wouldn't bite. He he didn't wanna do anything like that. And there was layers of people in the middle. One of my guys said, we'll go up to the office. I said, we'll go up to the office. Everybody around him is an ex FBI agent. We'll go up to the office. We'll get cuffed, and we'll go right to prison. So forget about Trump. He's a legitimate guy. He don't wanna do it. Forget about Trump. Yeah.
Saved - May 22, 2025 at 4:20 AM

@EndWokeness - End Wokeness

HOLY SHLIT Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson just got called out TO HIS FACE about his racist treatment of white residents https://t.co/SCQx61O1Lh

Saved - September 18, 2025 at 3:07 PM

@EndWokeness - End Wokeness

We really don't hate the media enough https://t.co/DHZBf0MJC9

View Full Interactive Feed