reSee.it - Related Post Feed
@TrumpWarRoom - Trump War Room
WATCH: Former Nevada Attorney General @AdamLaxalt details the voting irregularities and potential fraud that is under investigation in the state.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker highlights the insecurity of the system, mentioning that over 600,000 mail-in ballots have been counted, including some sent to dead people and those who moved out of the state. They claim that 200,000 votes were verified by a machine with a reduced signature verification standard. The speaker also mentions that the machine requires a 200 DPI setting to match signatures, but the photos in the Nevada system fall below this standard. They express concern that 400,000+ votes have not been looked at and emphasize the lack of scrutiny in the mail-in system. Specific allegations include dead voters and over 3,000 people who moved out of Las Vegas but still voted. The speaker acknowledges the difficulty in verifying these claims.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's important for people to understand, 1st and foremost, how insecure this system is. They we have over 600,000 mail in ballots that have been counted. Those are votes that are official in our system. We also know that we have unclean rolls. Both ballots that have been mailed to dead people, to people that moved out of the state and many there are people that got a dozen ballots in their homes, etc.
And what the situation we have here is that 200,000 of those votes have been verified by a machine only. And we've spoken to compute to AI I am computer vision experts on this and they have told us that the registrar reduced the signature vacation standard to 40%. And they have said
Speaker 1: So let me repeat just for a second so people understand what you're talking about. It's a machine that reads a signature on an since you're a mail in ballot and you're saying the claim is that people who control those machines turn them down to a lower setting So they would more readily accept a signature even if it wasn't a perfect match. Is that the allegation?
Speaker 0: Oh, well, that's not even an allegation and that that is admitted in open court and nobody's denying that. They still think that that it's a reliable system. And, and, we've now been speaking these experts and they say that once you remove the factory setting, it takes months months of a massive a team of experts to get this back to a reliable standard. The other thing that came out in court was that this machine requires there's a 200 DPI setting to match the signature on the envelope and the signature on the voter file. We know from court as well that the photos in the Nevada system are well below this 200.
Those 2 things combined cast graved out on the 200,000 signatures that were verified. And again, no human being went back and double check these, those ended up just counting and, and we also have the next 400 +1000 those in votes that we have never looked at. And when I say that people, people can't believe that.
Speaker 1: Well, let me ask you, okay, so you I know that you've made the argument in court, which has not been accepted, that the law actually in Nevada means it says that humans should be checking the signatures and this isn't a job that machines should be doing, but you're not claiming that any of those votes that you know who they were for, whether they were for Biden or Trump anybody else. You're just saying that the controls are not being followed according to what you say is state law there in Nevada.
Speaker 0: Yeah, look, it says employee or clerk, we believe that humans should should be able should have to look at it. But but just throw that aside, the fact of the matter is, we have not been able to look at these signatures. When people think of a regular election that you can actually challenge voters, you can actually be part of the system. They created this new mail in system where 600 plus 1,000 votes have had no scrutiny whatsoever. And so we are concerned that we have no idea.
When I tell people that that I'm sure there's bad signature matches, meaning there is fraud that snuck through the system. I don't know if that's a 1,000 bad signatures, or if it's a 100,000 bad signatures, but we can all agree that there's no way those 2 signatures setting aside that all 600,000 are a perfect match.
Speaker 1: Okay. But very quickly because we gotta go. Do you have specific allegations? You mentioned people receiving dozens of ballots, people dead people. Do you have specific Absolutely.
Absolutely. So
Speaker 0: so the attorney general has been attacking me for a week without evidence and he tweeted today that now we don't have there's not evidence of widespread voter fraud. So they backed off the fact that there's 0 voter fraud. Now they're saying we haven't produced enough. We're outside of the system. This is a needle in a haystack type situation.
We've produced dead voters, we've also produced over 3,000 people that moved out of Las Vegas this year and still voted in this election. There are many more voters than in system. And I try to explain to people, we don't get to just call them and they're not gonna work with us and verify something. We have to verify it independently. Same for the news media, by the way.
It is hard to pin this stuff down.
Speaker 1: That's why we wanna see right. That's why we wanna see the sworn allegations and I have seen quite a few and we're tracking those down as well. I know some of the people who moved out of state will say their military and that legally they can do those votes, but I know there's a lot you cannot deal with with.
Speaker 0: So we're gonna track Less than a 100.
Speaker 1: Okay. We're gonna track your cases. So please keep us up to date because we just want people to have the answer is in transparency. I think regardless of party Absolutely. Adam, I'm sorry.
Thank
Speaker 0: you. Thank you.
@ElectionWiz - Election Wizard
Team Trump was mocked when they claimed to have discovered large amounts of people who voted in Nevada who were no longer legal residents of the state. The Voter Integrity Project discovered 8,443 people who voted in Nevada who did not meet the residency requirements to vote. https://t.co/OXSCI2iaAR
@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸
Tucker Carlson “They rigged the election in front of all of us and nobody did anything about it” 16,000 hrs of surveillance video Detroit Heilmann voting center 3 hrs and15 min after polls closed in Michigan Mules loading thousands of Bidens into a minivan with Indiana plates.
@bennyjohnson - Benny Johnson
Here’s 24 straight minutes of Democrats denying election results Why didn’t Republican DA’s prosecute them?
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers in the video discuss their belief that the 2016 and 2020 elections were stolen or illegitimate due to Russian interference, voter suppression, and issues with electronic voting machines. They express concerns about the integrity of the election process and question the legitimacy of the elected officials. They also mention specific instances, such as the 2000 election and the Georgia gubernatorial race, where they believe the election results were unfair. Overall, they argue that the election system is flawed and needs reform to ensure fair and transparent elections.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You can
Speaker 1: run the best campaign. You can even become the nominee. And you can have the election stolen
Speaker 2: from you.
Speaker 3: How can you win with Russian interference, though?
Speaker 2: That's the real thing. Cared about
Speaker 1: it in 2020. But rightly.
Speaker 2: Because I think I'm taking
Speaker 3: an illegitimate president that didn't really win. So how do
Speaker 2: you, you know, fight against that in 2020? You are absolutely right. He is an illegitimate president in my mind. Could you
Speaker 4: be my vice president for Denimid president in my mind.
Speaker 2: Could you be my vice president for candidate? Paul Brooks, I absolutely agree. Trump didn't actually win the election in 2016. He lost the election, and he was put in the office because the Russians interfered.
Speaker 5: Russia interfered with our election, attacked our democracy for the sole purpose of artificially placing someone at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, they were successful.
Speaker 1: Trump knows he's as an illegitimate president.
Speaker 3: The president will elect, although legally elected, is not legitimate. Unless it is president-elect As a legitimate president.
Speaker 6: You said you believe that Russia's interference altered the outcome of the election.
Speaker 1: I do. We have a president who, if In fact, it is proven, has been assisted by the Russians and may, in fact, not be a legitimate president. The one thing that Trump Is fearful of, when it comes to his being president, is that finally, we will see how illegitimate his victory actually was.
Speaker 2: I have an objection.
Speaker 7: I object to the 15 votes from the state of North Carolina. I object because people are horrified.
Speaker 6: He's an illegitimate president. Our election was hijacked. There is no question. Congress has a duty to hashtag protect our democracy and hashtag follow the facts.
Speaker 5: John Lewis is completely right. There is a cloud of legitimacy around the election of Donald Trump. The Russians interfered with his election. James Comey and the FBI interfered with his, Election. The fake news industry interfered with his election.
Speaker 1: Trump knows he's an illegitimate president who got illegitimate foreign powers. Do you believe Trump is a legitimate president?
Speaker 4: What I believe is that there's no question that the outcome of this election was affected by the Russian interference.
Speaker 2: There actually is a cloud of Okay. Legitimacy.
Speaker 6: So that legitimacy is the question. Yes.
Speaker 3: So that was a very tainted election. And and in that sense, it's it's illegitimate.
Speaker 1: Why Why do you think the president is going to such great lengths to essentially prove that he beat you? Because he knows he didn't. He knows he's an illegitimate president.
Speaker 6: Stolen email. Stolen drone. Stolen drone. Stolen election. Welcome to the world of unprecedented Trump.
So do you believe President Trump is an illegitimate president.
Speaker 2: Based on what I just said was I can't for Trump.
Speaker 6: He tweeted in February 2018, quote, the more we learn about 2016 election, the more illegitimate it becomes. America deserves to know whether we have a fake president in the Oval Office.
Speaker 3: And The rest in attempt to to have the election. And frankly, the FBI is weighing in on the election. I think make the make it makes this election illegitimate.
Speaker 1: There was a widespread Understanding that this election was not on the level. We still don't know what really happened, Isaac. I mean, there's just a lot that I think will Be revealed, history will discover, but you don't win by 3,000,000 votes and have all this other shenanigans stuff going on and not come away with An idea like, woah, something's not right here.
Speaker 5: Seems to me that there's a cloud of illegitimacy that continues to hang Over 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.
Speaker 4: The outcome of the election was affected by their interference. And now we need to know, To what degree, if any, the Trump campaign was actually in collusion
Speaker 1: with the Russia? He knows he's an illegitimate president. So of course, he's obsessed That's with me. And I believe that it's a guilty conscience.
Speaker 2: We actually won the last presidential election, folks. They stole And Al Gore won that election. I think he won anyway. Actually, I think I carried Florida. Al Gore won the election nationwide Also in Florida, but the Supreme Court ruled the other way.
Al Gore got more votes, but not enough to stay out of the Supreme Court where president Bush was elected five four.
Speaker 1: Bush versus Gore. A court took away a presidency.
Speaker 2: If all the votes were tallied in Florida, Adele Gold would be president today and George Bush would be back in office.
Speaker 0: I come from Florida where you and others participated in what I call The United States coup d'etat.
Speaker 6: In 2013, according to reports, vice president Joe Biden, he claimed that Al Gore was The one who was elected president. And he claimed that the recount result was, quote, a bad decision.
Speaker 2: And never forget, dear friends, what they did in Florida to Al Gore and me, to all of us, to older Americans, to African Americans, to Haitian Americans Deny the right to vote and have those votes counted.
Speaker 8: I do believe that projections were right in the 1st place at 7 o'clock when they called
Speaker 1: it before. Let me tell you without a doubt. George Bush did not carry Florida and it was not closed.
Speaker 2: There's no question that you won Oh, thank you, Charles. No. It's a question.
Speaker 4: That's a question.
Speaker 2: We will never know because The votes weren't weren't counted. But but and and then in your judgment I mean, that's unfortunate. And there is no other way of saying Let's be very blunt. Al Gore won the state of Florida in 2000, and we should never Forget it. Most Americans or great many Americans don't have confidence that the election of 2000 was fair.
Speaker 8: But I don't believe we lost that. I believe we just failed to have all of the votes counted
Speaker 4: The Supreme Court elected president. In 2004. Yeah. Al Gore won the state of Florida in 2000, although not the presidency.
Speaker 3: We know we won this election. They know we won this election. And Americans know we won this election.
Speaker 7: I know some people want you to believe that the Gore Campaign was a campaign that wasn't able to complete its mission. We did. Had all of
Speaker 0: those votes been found in Florida,
Speaker 8: I
Speaker 7: think Al Gore would be president on today.
Speaker 2: We had more votes. We won, and we are never going to let the United States Supreme Court choose the president of the United Takes the care. You should know by now based on the fact that he lost the popular vote by more than a half 1000000 voters, And we don't know how many he lost to buy in Florida. There's no doubt in my mind that Al Gore was elected president.
Speaker 9: I rise to Object to the fraudulent 25 Florida electoral votes.
Speaker 2: Really, we won the election in 2000, but they stole the election. I must object because of the overwhelming evidence of overwhelming evidence of official misconduct, deliberate fraud, and an attempt to The chairman has provided Imran had already Helped the Bush team with such favors as burying their rent a mob to Florida in 2000 to permanently halt of the counting of legally cast ballots. It is
Speaker 7: signed by myself on behalf of my diverse constituents and the millions of Americans who have been disenfranchised by Florida's inaccurate vote counts to Supreme Court not to speak with
Speaker 4: the United States despite of this election.
Speaker 1: Speaking to a Democratic group in Chicago, he said he made it clear he thinks Al Gore was the winner.
Speaker 2: The time it was over, our candidate won the popular vote. And the only way that could win the election was to stop the voting and fraud it. Catherine Harris, Jeb Bush, Jim Baker and the Supreme Court hadn't tampered with the results, l Gore would be. President? I think that the issue before us today, is not who won or should have won the 2000 presidential election.
That issue has been settled not to my opinion, but it has been settled. Let's just drop the vice president president or not. Al Gore should have been president of the United States.
Speaker 10: Al Gore, made it possible for George Bush to be The only appointed president in the history of these United States.
Speaker 6: Democrats have won the past 3 presidential elections. In two
Speaker 2: 1,000 unions turned out 25% of the vote and Al Gore won. But the Supreme Court hampered? That's a large The Supreme Court stopped the counting of votes, and if they've left the council on, Al Gore would've got the necessary votes.
Speaker 0: The Supreme Court selected tent. George w Bush
Speaker 2: as the president. He was not elected. There is overwhelming evidence that George w Bush did not win this Election.
Speaker 3: What I observed, as a voter, as a citizen of Illinois, 4 years ago were troubling evidence of the fact that not every vote was being counted. Don't think that George w Bush won the election, in 2000 against our goal because I I think he he probably lost Florida and also the nationwide.
Speaker 2: If you invite me back on this show
Speaker 3: in about 8 weeks, I
Speaker 2: think you're gonna learn that No, Roy. I think you get all the votes there. I felt what happened in Florida was a carefully worked out conspiracy. That many things could not go wrong in one state Without there having been a conspiracy, and many, many different things did go wrong. Many tricks were pulled of various kinds.
Speaker 8: The vice president did win, but, And I do believe that the majority of voters that intended to to go to polls last year wanted to vote and cast their votes for Al Gore. I do believe that in in in terms of Florida as well.
Speaker 2: The court has been supporting formation of the popular will. The most spectacular example being Bush versus Gore, where the majority by a five For a vote and joined the counting of more than a 100,000 ballots in Florida and essentially gave America its 1st court appointed president. A stolen citizen is naked and stolen. Even though Al Gore won the election, he won't take office.
Speaker 11: That election was stolen from of the rightful winner. So, mister speaker, I'm here today to talk about a stolen presidential election.
Speaker 2: I think in 2000, everybody Talk. Well, he did win the election out of the war. He started dividing America here in Florida By trying to take an election that I think any reasonable person would say he hadn't Actually, one.
Speaker 0: What happened in Florida will go down in history As a coup d'etat.
Speaker 2: Could we conclude, is it possible There was a conspiracy, and Florida officials were involved in the conspiracy. Never have so many things gone It's too wrong in one place before. Why how do all these things happen all at the same time in the same state? It is not as possible if there was a conspiracy that was very well organized. Why was the state police out there on that Today, election day, checking license plates and and so forth.
You know, how did all these things happen in 1 state at one time in 1 election? Is is it possible that Use the word conspiracy and not be afraid of it.
Speaker 1: I'm not sure wish Gore was president right now. He should be.
Speaker 2: Well, yes, he got elected. Well done. A battle that by the will of the people should have ended in victory. But tens thousands of Florida votes either were not counted or tossed down in the 2000 presidential election. 5 supreme court justices.
You've trumped the votes of 51,000,000 Americans. We should've let the entire state be reconned so it was clear, that Al Gore actually won the state of Florida.
Speaker 0: And Al War won the election.
Speaker 2: We had the election stolen from us. You must admit that. They stole it, And we need a leader to help us get revenge.
Speaker 6: I voted for Al Gore. He won the election.
Speaker 2: They usurped the the powers as far as being put in it and intervene. It was With the fix as far as we're concerned, you know, it's it's there's no polite way to talk about it except the fix was in.
Speaker 0: After the election, when you stole Hold the election. You came back here and say, get over it. No. We're not gonna get over it.
Speaker 2: You know it. I know it. They know it. We won that election.
Speaker 12: Constantly shifting vote tallies in Ohio and malfunctioning electronic machines, which may not have paper receipts have led to additional loss of confidence by the public.
Speaker 2: The right to vote has been stolen from qualified voters. The New
Speaker 6: Yorker reported that Kerry thought that, quote, proxies for Bush had rigged many of the voting machines.
Speaker 7: In 2004, the democratic process was thwarted.
Speaker 2: To The 2004 presidential election in Ohio was riddled with unnecessary problems.
Speaker 4: Some machines malfunctioned, causing votes to be counted more than once or not at all.
Speaker 2: Based upon an inordinate number of allegations suggesting gross voting rights violations and misconduct, I joined with my colleagues and objective to counting the state of Ohio's electoral votes. As in 2000, the votes of many who wanted to vote were not, in fact, This
Speaker 3: last Friday night, I I arranged to meet senator Kerry at a fundraiser to give him a copy of my book. He told me he now thinks the election was stolen.
Speaker 1: The wife of John Kerry said she has lingering doubts about the legitimacy of the election. Her theory goes like this. 2 brothers, she calls hard right Republicans, Own 80% of voting machines in the US. Therefore, it would be easy to hack into the mother machines that control the electronic voting.
Speaker 7: There were Numerous irregularities in Ohio, including large percentages of projections of provisional balloting, problems with voting machines.
Speaker 1: As we look At our election system, I think it's fair to say that there are many legitimate questions about its accuracy, About its integrity.
Speaker 12: There are still legitimate concerns over the integrity of our election.
Speaker 3: The question obviously is How many instances were not caught that we don't know about? Number 1, we've seen a lot of, what I'll call, honest glitches where it just didn't work right, But also that these machines are hackable. A dishonest employee of the vendor or dishonest employee of the local board of elections or simply someone who knows electronics And as a computer at home, could hack into these machines and then put in the secret instructions to disregard every 20th Democratic voter had 10% to the carrier to the Bush vote or whatever. He might not even know it.
Speaker 2: I agree with tens of millions of Americans Who are more very worried that when they cast the ballot on an electronic voting machine, that there There is no paper trail to record that vote. The numerous irregularities that occurred with the electronic voting machines In Ohio on November 2nd last year, point to an unresolved national crisis.
Speaker 7: We cannot Clear that
Speaker 3: the election of November 2, 2004 was free and clear and transparent and real. There must be independent testing of the voting machines used in Ohio.
Speaker 1: I'm not confident that the election in Ohio was barely decided. We know that there was substantial voter suppression, and the machines were not reliable.
Speaker 12: The members of Congress who have brought this challenge are speaking up for their agreed constituents, many of whom may have been disenfranchised in this process.
Speaker 6: Treating today's electoral vote count in congress as a meaningless ritual would be an insult to our democracy unless we registered our own protest against the obviously fraud voting process that took place in so many
Speaker 2: of our states. Voters who wish to cast a vote for president or vice president Can't approach the polls with certainty that their vote will be counted. One of the most significant problems in Ohio and in many other states Was a lack of measures to ensure the integrity of electronic voting machines. In 2004, they caused democratic voters in Ohio to wait for 8 hours before they could cast their ballot. They turned the department of civil rights and the justice department into the voter suppression division with Voter ID laws, voter purging, voter caging, voter intimidation.
There aren't gonna be any more election stealing.
Speaker 1: Now you have one very
Speaker 6: We won. But I
Speaker 1: didn't lose. I got the votes, but we won't know exactly how many because of how they cheat it. I did win my election. I just didn't get to have the job. We were robbed of an election.
Without voter suppression, Stacey Abrams would be the governor of Georgia. Andrew Gillum is the governor of Florida. Using the
Speaker 4: word rigged, using the word steal, do you think it's dangerous going into 2020?
Speaker 1: I I don't because we can actually back it up. And so in response What I believe was stolen election. I'm not saying they stole it from me. They stole it from the voters' doors. That's when I was asked if I'm ever gonna concede.
The answer is no. If she had a fair election, she already would have won. This is not a speech of concession. This is a step that needs to acknowledge an action that's right, true, or action is right, true or proper. And I will not concede because the erosion of our democracy is not You refuse to concede and say that you lost.
Do you stand by that decision today? Absolutely.
Speaker 2: If Stacey Abrams doesn't win in Georgia, they Stolen. It's clear. It's clear.
Speaker 1: The only election It was not a free and fair I think the election was stolen from the people of Georgia. I believe it was stolen from the voters.
Speaker 2: So I
Speaker 3: think that Stacey Abrams' election is being stolen from her.
Speaker 1: The election was not fair. The process was not fair. Thousands of Georgians had their voices stolen because they were not able to cast ballots. And they cannot be guaranteed that their votes will be counted in 2020 if we don't do this right.
Speaker 4: If what happens to you happens nationally and we we see, whoever runs for whoever wins the Democratic nominee. If they say, actually, I can prove that there's a number of votes in every state that that and that's and that's the same thing that you just described happens in multiple states should they concede.
Speaker 1: I do not think we should concede an election until we know the results of an election. I still fundamentally believed it could be fair. And that's just not how life works. If it looks like it's cheating, it probably is. If it looks like it's rigged, it probably is.
Speaker 2: He would be the governor of Georgia today had the governor of Georgia not disenfranchised 1,400,000 Georgia voters before the election. That's what happened to Stacey Abrams. They took the votes away.
Speaker 6: You, notably did not concede. I acknowledge. Okay. You acknowledge That he won, but you did not concede. Correct.
5 months later, do you still feel like your opponent won through voter suppression? Yes. Reminder, she wrote. Brian Kemp stole the gubernatorial election from Georgians and Stacey Abrams.
Speaker 1: I said that the election stolen from Georgia voters, the process that took place during the legislative cycle was one that did not countenance and did not pay attention To the deep and real concerns of those who watch this election be stolen in the state of Georgia. It was stolen from the voters of Georgia. Georgia voters did not have their votes Counted. They were not allowed to cast votes. They had
Speaker 2: their votes discarded. Certainly gave the appearance of unfairness. I think it was, unfair. Stacy ran a great campaign. Probably won.
Speaker 1: And it was not fair to those who filled up absentee ballots. And depending on the county you sent it to, it Either it was counted or not counted, assuming you received it in time. Brian Kemp oversaw for 8 years the systematic and Systemic dismantling of our democracy, and that means there could not be free and fair elections in Georgia. As long as we have eligible American citizens who cannot cast a ballot, Then the game is rigged. I am complicit if I say that that system is fair.
Concession in the political space is an acknowledgement that the process This is fair. And I don't believe that to be fair. But I refuse to concede because concession means that the process was proper, that the result was true and And right. And I cannot say that. If I tend to
Speaker 0: say I didn't lose, I just didn't win.
Speaker 12: And I don't call it a lot.
Speaker 1: I just didn't win.
Speaker 2: Yes. Yes. Officially. Yes. Officially.
Speaker 1: Put it this way. I didn't get to get Inaugurated, next problem. Okay. But will I say that this election was not tainted, was not a disinvestment and a disenfranchisement of thousands of voters? I will not say that.
Candidates votes, black and white, lost Their races because they have been deprived of the votes they otherwise would have gotten. And the clearest sample is from next door in Georgia. Stacey Abrams should be governor leading that state right now. I was joking with Beth backstage when she lost. I'm like, no, I just didn't win, because we don't know what really happened because of the miasma of voter suppression.
I can't know for a fact that I would be the governor of Georgia, but for the He's in the management of Brian Kemp, but I know it's a pretty good guess. So I can't prove that I would have won, but I know we don't know because of how he behaved.
Speaker 3: Is he the legitimate governor elect of Georgia?
Speaker 1: He is the person who won an adequate number of votes from the governor.
Speaker 2: With all with all due respect, and
Speaker 3: I respect where you're coming from and I respect the the issues that you're raising. You're not answering the question. Do you think that
Speaker 1: Wait a minute. I no. I what I talked to you
Speaker 3: You're not using The word legitimate, is he the legitimate governor elect Georgia?
Speaker 1: He is the legal governor of Georgia. He's not here to tell you that just because you win doesn't mean you're won. And you said to that you did not lose. You just did not win. Yes.
So we're gonna talk about that. Bad news is that we didn't get the victory we secured. And the thing is we will never know empirically that I got more votes because we will never know which votes did make count. This was not fair. It was not right and it is deeply improper that someone could ascend to that role having performed So basically and so crassly against the very people he is now supposed to represent.
The election was not fair. The process was not fair. So you don't feel that you lost fair and I do recognize I am not the governor of Georgia, but I do like to point out something that is true for me and for many in our state. And that is we won.
Speaker 2: I'm not saying it's gonna be legit because the increase in the prospect of being illegitimate is a Direct proportions not being able to get these these reforms passed.
Speaker 1: Right wing extremists already have a plan to literally seal the next presidential election.
Speaker 13: It's not as if it's just Republicans who have monkeed around with elections in the past. Sometimes Democrats have to.
Speaker 2: You
Speaker 13: know, whenever people are in power, they're, you know, they have this tendency to try to, you know, tilt things in their direction.
@DiamondandSilk - Diamond and Silk®
You wanted Evidence of Election Fraud, well here it is....
Video Transcript AI Summary
Silk presents evidence of alleged election fraud in the 2020 US election. Statistical anomalies in Michigan, Wisconsin, and Georgia are discussed, with sudden spikes in votes for Joe Biden during a 5-hour window when counting had reportedly stopped. These spikes were deemed abnormal and extreme, potentially impacting the election outcome. Eyewitness and video evidence from Georgia is presented, showing a poll worker handling absentee ballots after hours. Cybersecurity experts claim that Dominion Voting Machines were connected to the internet and vulnerable to manipulation. Forensic audits of the machines in Michigan revealed high error rates and violations of election laws. The video urges viewers to share the evidence and demand election reform.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You all keep saying show me the evidence. Show me the evidence. Well, Silk got the evidence, and I want you all to play the next clip. Please play clip 3.
Speaker 1: No matter which side of the fence people have been on, they've been saying, show me the evidence. I'll believe it when I see the evidence. And people on both sides agree that something went terribly wrong in November 2020, but there really has been no comprehensive place to See the evidence of widespread fraud until now. This video is pure data, so don't get mad. You can't be angry when a scientist confirms gravity pulls downward at negative 9.8 meters per second squared even when that fact works against the narrative you've heard.
So here we go. Just before we show you some new disturbing video evidence, we'll talk about statistical anomalies in 3 states in question. In the early hours of November 4, 2020, Democratic candidate Joe Biden received several major boat spikes in Michigan, Wisconsin, and Georgia, suddenly placing him in the lead When he had been trailing Trump by a significant margin, 8,954 individual vote updates were analyzed across nearly all updates that follows Clear statistical pattern. However, a very small number of batches are especially questionable. The 4 most notable aberrations were 2 in Michigan, 1 in Wisconsin, and 1 in Georgia, and all occurred in the Same 5 hour window in the middle of the night when in some places counting reportedly had stopped.
Not only do these updates not follow generally observed patterns, but their behavior is particularly extreme. For context, using publicly available data from the New York Times, here is a visualization of the number of votes by candidate in Michigan from the beginning of the election night to 7 PM EST on November 4th. Trump is in red. Biden is in blue. Notice the sudden and improbable spike in votes for Biden at 6:30 AM where Biden received 141,258 votes while Trump only received 5,968.
This extreme ratio is surrounded by updates that are nearly the same in ratio. This particular update is 23 times more votes for Biden and is the most extreme update favoring Biden in all datasets Across all states, the situation in Wisconsin is even more stark. A single update to the vote count brought Biden from trailing by over 100,000 votes into the lead. Thirdly, a vote update in Georgia at 1:34 AM EST on November 4th, which shows a 136,150 votes for Joe Biden and only 29,115 for Donald Trump. The extents of these 4 votes spikes in question are more than the margin of victory in all 3 states, which means the spikes were not only abnormal in regards to percentage for Joe Biden, but also in magnitude of the vote count.
Out of roughly 9,000 updates, this election was decided by only 4 extreme updates, each with a probability of less than 1 tenth of 1%. Meaning, that had 4 unlikely updates not happened, we would have a different president in the White House. Detractors argue that these spikes were merely human error and not indication of fraud, and the errors have been corrected. If the errors have been corrected, where is their evidence? Why were the results never changed?
Others have said that the spikes indicate heavily democratic precincts. If that were the case, then California would show many spikes of that magnitude, but it doesn't. Only 1 vote update in California Anomalous in percentage of Biden votes, but not enough magnitude to shift an outcome. The strangest anomaly visible in the data is a consistently identical ratio of Biden to Trump votes across time, which is theoretically impossible. Here is Florida.
These updates occurred over a week following the election. Notice all the ratios of Biden to Trump votes are a 100% identical over several days. This pattern shows up in many states. It appears that a computer algorithm Is involved in the process, which is doing something called weighted race distribution. A feature of voting machines known as early as 2001, which gives values to votes rather than simply counting them.
Here in California, we see an update of 1 vote. About 65 Percent of that value is given to Biden and 32% to Trump. How can 1 vote go to more than 1 person? It is well known and not disputed that Diebold's software was to be switching votes through programming in past elections. Even though Diebold is no longer used, Dominion Voting Systems acquired ES and S in 2010, which acquired Diebold under its new name of Premier Election Solutions.
This does not exhaust all statistical data anomalies in the 2020 election, but the anomalies is only one factor to consider. Next is eyewitness and video evidence. In Georgia, there's a case of a poll worker named Ruby who was seen on Instagram giving a secretive live video of her working in the backroom filled with absentee ballots. At 10:30 PM on November 3rd, all media and poll watchers were told to leave State Farm Arena Because ballot counting was going to stop. But Ruby and her daughter and 3 others remained behind at State Farm Arena.
They pulled boxes of ballots out from under the table that was placed there in the morning and distributed them to several accounting stations.
Speaker 2: Back to Fulton County, Georgia right now, where our reporter Blaine Alexander apparently has some new reporting on the expectations for that Count.
Speaker 3: Well, Rachel, we've learned that the counting continues tonight. You know, right here in State Farm arena behind me, we've learned that there are 5 people who are Still inside, still working to scan those absentee ballots and try and get those numbers tabulated. Now initially, we believe we were told that everybody went home at At 10:30, but I just got off the phone with the county spokesperson who tells me that indeed there are still some people in there quite literally burning the midnight oil, scanning ballot after ballot and trying to get that Information in.
Speaker 2: And, Blaine, specifically, you said 5 people are inside that building. That's 5 of 5 actual individuals who are working all the ups and t's in Fulton County right now, just 5? Wow. Talk about having the sort of fate of the nation in your hands.
Speaker 1: Ruby is seen here in this video running the exact same stack of ballots to the machine three times. Other workers do the same. Note that a large surge in Biden votes can be observed after this tabulation at 06:34 Greenwich Mean Time, which is 1:34 AM in Georgia just After the time in question, you may ask, can a ballot really be counted more than once? Here is your answer from Coffee County, Georgia.
Speaker 2: Can you stand a ballot more than once?
Speaker 4: I've just done it. You just did the
Speaker 3: same batch that she's been doing.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Just keep scanning you.
Speaker 4: I just kept scanning that same Alright.
Speaker 2: She just keeps
Speaker 4: I just scanned the same batches that y'all just voted. Mhmm. I never got any more until that one. Then why
Speaker 2: they approved such a sister?
Speaker 1: Ruby allegedly posted this later on media. Of course, the mainstream media calls this misinformation, and most references to these videos have been deleted from Internet search results. Apple News, the morning of the election, sent out a push message to Apple News subscribers that elections are secure. So if it's true that election fraud is rare, what about Raquel Rodriguez. She was recently arrested for election fraud in Texas because of overwhelming video evidence incriminating herself that she was harvesting Ballots are paid.
Speaker 5: Leave the top of tickets to get votes for your Biden. How many votes do you think you can deliver for us?
Speaker 2: At least five thousand. And what are
Speaker 5: we looking at as far as how much that's gonna cost?
Speaker 2: For the entire team that I'm looking at, I'm looking at 55
Speaker 5: So $55,000 or $5,000 out if it gets either right?
Speaker 2: If not more, I'm I'm not gonna overpromise because remember, we we're we're 16 days till election day. You you can give me cash. You can
Speaker 5: do whatever you to do. $55,000 upfront. $5,000.
Speaker 2: That's right.
Speaker 1: Then there is cybersecurity evidence in the question of whether the Dominion Voting Machines tampered with over Internet connections. Signed affidavits under oath from cybersecurity experts indicate that Dominion Voter Systems and Edison Research were using an unencrypted VPN with login credentials that were easily accessible and used by foreign adversaries to monitor and manipulate boats. The IP addresses into the Edison Research Coast Service went in both directions, Meaning that not only were China and Iran and other countries accessing the servers, but also Edison Research was communicating back to these adversaries. The claims that Voting machines were not connected to the Internet are completely false. Cybersecurity experts have followed the communication of the data from Dominion Voting Servers and Edison Research To foreign countries.
A simple web search will uncover that dominionvotingsystems.com is registered to a company in Hunan, China. 3 of the 7 board members of UBS are Chinese nationals. That company owns Staple Street Capital, which in turn owns Dominion. On top of that, the Dominion software is licensed from Smartmatic, which is a Venezuelan owned and controlled company, and we're all familiar with how their elections go. Furthermore, forensic audits of the machines reveal significant errors.
Although the mainstream media and politicians are saying that it's dangerous misinformation that Dominion Voting Systems are unsecure, this was the very message that several left leaning news sources were claiming less In a year ago, NBC News and PBS found out just how easy it is to hack voting machines or cast fake votes.
Speaker 6: Want to know that Georgia just spent over a100 or is about to spend over $100,000,000 on a contract with Dominion to provide image cast hardware to the state in time for the 20, for the for the next primaries and for the 2020 Election and yet here these kids were who had opened it up, they said, look, you can pop the front off of it and here's a port you can get into right here that's easy, you know, all kinds of stuff that That you could certainly do within 6 minutes behind a curtain, much less, if you had extra time because any of these were, connected to the web as we've discovered Couple days before, so many of them are
Speaker 1: Despite opposition and attacks, election security experts were able to audit Dominion Voting Machines in Antrim County, Michigan, revealing unusually high error and adjudication rates. What does that mean? According to the report, Dominion Voting Systems is intentionally designed with inherent errors to create systemic Fraud and influence election results. Ballot errors are sent to adjudication, which means the vote can be decided by an election worker where there is no oversight, No transparency and no audit trail.
Speaker 5: We scanned a 113,130 as of moments ago. We've indicated a 106,000 possible.
Speaker 1: Experts identified an error rate of 68.05%, which is far above the Federal Election Commission guidelines of Federal election commission guidelines of 0.0008% were 1 in 250,000. Although vote adjudication logs are available for prior years. Suspiciously, all the logs for the 2020 were missing. Moreover, all security logs prior to 11:03 PM on November 4th are also missing. If that's not enough, the election event designer log shows that the Dominion Image cast precinct cards We're reprogrammed on October 23rd and again on November 5th, which violates the Help America Vote Act, which includes a 90 day Safe harbor period that prohibits changes to election systems, registries, hardware, and software updates without undergoing recertification.
Even if skeptics and critics persist that these issues are in Consequential. They should be willing for forensic audits to take place for transparency, yet they have viciously attacked attempts to review Why is that if there's nothing to hide? Election officials in Maricopa County, Arizona have even ignored subpoenas for release of election data and Dominion Machine audits until after the inauguration. Then there's the massive flux of unsolicited mail in ballots. The keyword is unsolicited.
In other words, people receiving ballots they never asked for. Politicians use the coronavirus to push mass mail in and extending the time to receive those ballots till many days after the election. There are many reports of people who voted in person also multiple unsolicited ballots in the mail. People who did not send in a mail in ballot denied in person voting because they were told they had voted already by mail when they hadn't. This opened up chaos in the system and uncertainty as to who actually voted.
Additionally, signature verification requirements was slackened in many states adding even more uncertainty. In fact, the Pennsylvania secretary of state unilaterally removed legislative signature requirements for mail in ballots. More than a 1000 signed affidavits have been given by poll workers who have witnessed illegal activities, non equal treatment of Republican poll watchers, counting ballots in Locations with no poll watchers, poll watchers not permitted close enough to see the counting process, shredding ballots, garbage bags full of ballots for Trump, entire boxes of hundreds of supposedly mail in ballots that have no folds indicating they were never actually mailed by anyone. The list goes on and on. These affidavits assigned by witnesses under penalty of perjury, so this should not have been taken lightly, but these witnesses were never heard in court.
Unfortunately, what we have covered is only the tip of the iceberg on fraud, cover ups, federal election law violations, and dishonesty on a global scale.
Speaker 7: So either the secretary of state's office is recording and certifying results that have negative errors and fraudulent votes
Speaker 8: in them, or someone is giving them negative
Speaker 1: permission. Recent polls show an overwhelming percentage of the US don't trust the 2020 election was without fraud. At the end of this video, the credits will be further data scrolling through that you can read for yourself and pause and go back and read again. So what can you do? Firstly, find a way to download this video and share it.
Film it with your mobile phone. Do anything to duplicate this. Post it with a hashtag here is the evidence, hashtag every legal vote. Because big tech and social media giants will do their best to erase it from the Internet as they've already done with much of the evidence we've already shared. And if they can't erase it, they'll fake fact check it.
Well, guess what? We've already done the fact checking. We've gone through thousands of pages of data, sworn affidavits, forensic reports, and cybersecurity reports. Secondly, you can demand election reform from your election state and local officials. We cannot let another election ever be this questionable ever again.
This is the United of America. People used to look to us on how to have democracy through our voting system. 2020 was a complete sham, and it cannot ever happen again.
Speaker 0: Special thank you to whoever put that particular video together. My team is going to load that video up as a stand alone video for all to see and for all to share. And I'm pretty sure that frank speech.com, lindelltv also have this video as a stand alone video for you all to take it, download it, Put it on platform, share with everybody, and let them know that we have the evidence. When they say show me the evidence, say, here it is. Look at this right here.
Okay?
@LeadingReport - Leading Report
BREAKING: A former USPS employee blows the whistle on 100,000 missing Wisconsin ballots.
Video Transcript AI Summary
An employee at the Milwaukee Street post office in Madison, Wisconsin claimed that 100,000 missing ballots were reported by the USPS. However, the employee doubted this claim based on their experience. Another USPS employee revealed that they were instructed to backdate late-received ballots as long as they were postmarked for the 3rd. The employee expressed concern about the integrity of the election and emphasized the need for action to restore faith in the electoral process. They questioned why the USPS was searching for ballots on November 4th, hours after the polls had closed.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: He explained to me that an order had come down from the Wisconsin, Illinois chapter of the USPS that 100,000 ballots were missing. He then told me that his post office, the one at Milwaukee Street in Madison, Wisconsin, had dispatched employees used to look for the missing ballots around 4 AM, November 4th. He said, and I quote, around 4 AM. And that only ballots, 7 or 8 ballots were found at United Mailing Services, my work. Based on my previous experience ballots inhabit of double checking for the ballots, I believe that to be a lie immediately.
The following day, November 5th twenty, I had a conversation with a different USPS employee whose name I also know, in which she the USPS employees were ordered to backdate ballots that were received too late to be lawfully counted. I asked this employee if I would be getting in trouble for those ballots the night before with my own boss, just kinda making sure that I was covered. Because at first, I I think perhaps I did miss ballots, but I couldn't have if they weren't on the card where they're supposed to be. The employee said, employee said, no. I wouldn't as long as they were postmarked for the 3rd.
And then she hesitated for a moment and for a moment and said that's why they had us do that, referring to USPS employees. I'm not a Trump supporter. I'm not Biden supporter. I voted for Joe Jordans in this election, and I voted libertarian in the Wisconsin governor governor's race in bounty eighteen, which was my 1st election that I could vote in. But I know that something wrong here, and I just wanna see that something gets done about it for our state and for the people of our state so that people can have faith in our bad elections, I think the American people and the people of Wisconsin have a right to battle, what happened?
And the bottom line of this is why was the USPS even looking for ballots on November 4th, hours after the polls closed at 8 PM.
@LeadingReport - Leading Report
BREAKING: Election experts say President Trump would have won the 2020 election 305-233 if all ‘trafficked ballots’ by mules were removed.
@the_trump_wins - Trump Wins
Tucker Carlson “They rigged the election in front of all of us and nobody did anything about it” 16,000 hrs of surveillance video Detroit Heilmann voting center 3 hrs and15 min after polls closed in Michigan Mules loading thousands of Bidens into a minivan with Indiana plates.
@TheRISEofROD - Machiavelli
Rigged Elections Have Consequences Send this to a democrat: https://t.co/PYRihhS4xc
Video Transcript AI Summary
In a recent 60-minute interview, the speaker expresses strong criticism towards President Joe Biden and his administration. They believe that the administration is corrupt and incompetent, and that Biden is unable to address the issues facing the country. The speaker questions why a disclaimer was placed before the interview and highlights the lack of coherence in Biden's responses. They argue that other countries are not taking the United States seriously, leading to attacks from groups like Hamas. The speaker concludes by suggesting that something catastrophic is imminent and expresses confusion about the current state of affairs.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Sleepy Joe 60 minute interview was the most preposterous, ridiculous, sadden thing I've ever seen on national television and history. This administration is so terrible and they know it. They know it's so much that they decided to take it upon themselves to put a fucking disclaimer before the interview. Now you might be asking yourself, what did the disclaimer actually say? Well, Long story short, it's sugarco.
This is the old motherfucker that is incompetent, don't know where he's at, don't know how he got there and don't know what the fuck is going on. They pretty much said, bear with this old corrupt motherfucker. Seen this man sit here and try to justify his wrongdoing for the last 3 years. It's fucking ridiculous. I don't care if you're a liberal, Republican, conservative, independent.
I think at this point, we all can agree that this motherfucker and this administration and this government is beyond corrupt. Okay, it can't be no obvious than what the this man had the audacity to sit on TV and say, I can fix it. As if somebody else did this shit. As if somebody else did the inflation or started this war or or or or have all this bullshit that's going on right now as if Trump started it. All this shit happened on your end, sleepy Joe.
When you gonna clean up your mess, you don't get if I rerun for pres no. No. We don't want you to rerun for president. No. Go sit your ass down.
Y'all have to go see this 60 minute interview. Not for the fact of knowledge, but you all have to see this shit to believe it, man. Other countries are laughing at us. That's why Hamas is attacking because They don't they don't they don't see us serious. There's no backbone.
Why? Because this government, this administration has sold us out. It was that simple. This is all over fucking money. This man couldn't even form a co why do you even do an interview if you can't form a coherent sentence?
The interview asked some simple ass question. Don't. Don't. Don't. Don't what?
Give a fucking reasonable answer to why our country is fucked up. At this point, I I genuinely believe the movie 2012 is coming to life. And here's why. I feel like they're building something to jet the fuck out because something catastrophic is about to happen. This shit ain't making sense.
What the hell is going on, man?
@polishprincessh - 👑💥 Serenity 💥👑
10,000 illegal aliens using the same exact social security number voted on November 3, 2020 https://t.co/gMSABJdbGf
Video Transcript AI Summary
We found 10,000 people using the same Social Security number. They are brought in illegally and given a number to pay taxes. Companies hire them across various plants and factories, all using the same number. The IRS only checks if there's an employer linked to the number, validating it. This allows these individuals to obtain driver's licenses and potentially influence voter rolls. These workers don't pay taxes as it's deducted by the companies. The government has a $1.7 trillion slush fund, generating $100 million in interest monthly. This information reveals a corrupt system that benefits everyone involved, leading to attempts on the speaker's life.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We discovered 10,000 people using the exact Social Security number. See if this one rings true. You take an illegal. You bring them in. They sign a piece of paper promising to pay taxes.
What they get is a Social Security number so the employers can take out the taxes. Put a pin in that. Here's what they do. In cities like this, let's think of A chicken processor. They will bring in hundreds of illegals.
They will spread them out across all of these plants and factories, giving them jobs. They're all using the same Social Security number. The IRS unconnected our names from the Social Security number. Now when you look it up, it just pings to see if there's an employer. If there is, it says it's good.
It validates it. Why do they do that? Because all of these factories are giving them Social Security numbers. The government turns its back on it. As you have a Social Security number and you go over to motor voter, pass the driver's court test, Right?
You get a driver's license. Suppression, look, you got a social. You must be a citizen. That's how they pack the roles. By the way, those guys don't pay taxes anyway.
It's taken out by companies. Our government's been sitting on $1,700,000,000,000 slush fund that that one fund has still in it to this day. So if you wanna know where the dark money comes from by the way, that's what, $100,000,000 in, a month in interest. I could go on. I now understand this is why they tried to kill us, and it's not stuff I wanted to know.
It's not stuff I wanted to know about my country. It's not stuff I believed, But we have a uniparty. We don't have multiple parties. Everybody's benefited from this at one time or another.
@ChuckCallesto - Chuck Callesto
JUST IN: Shock poll reveals MASSIVE voter fraud.. 17 % of mail in voters ADMITTED to voting in a state where they don’t live.. 21 % ADMITTED to filling out someone else’s ballot.. 8% reveal they were OFFERED MONEY to vote.. https://t.co/eiRSI0jqdF
Video Transcript AI Summary
A recent Heartland Rasmussen poll reveals some concerning statistics about voting behavior. According to the poll, 17% of individuals confessed to voting in a state where they do not reside. Additionally, 21% admitted to completing another person's ballot, while 8% acknowledged being offered money in exchange for their vote. These findings shed light on potential issues surrounding the integrity of the voting process.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: A new Heartland Rasmussen poll finds that 17% of people admit they voted in a state where they don't live. 21% admitted they filled out someone else's ballot. And 8% admitted they were offered money to vote.
@the_trump_wins - Trump Wins
Tucker Carlson “They rigged the election in front of all of us and nobody did anything about it” 16,000 hrs of surveillance video Detroit Heilmann voting center 3 hrs and15 min after polls closed in Michigan Mules loading thousands of Bidens into a minivan with Indiana plates. https://t.co/LO3dORdtvW
@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸
Tucker Carlson ‘they rigged the election’ and wiped their crimes clean ‘in front of all of us and nobody did anything about it.’ Not even a congressman. https://t.co/U4NqE67Kmj
Video Transcript AI Summary
I found a video where the speaker goes through some server logs and discovers a database issue. They mention finding different forensics related to it. They also mention a person named Christy, who seems to be active in the GMC community.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So here's the video that everybody is calling me. Let's see. Who do we do? The the server logs. Well, I went back to to our logs.
Logs. And guess who it is? Who it is. Database in my extended. That's what I find find different forensics.
What a great person to have on a GMC here in the community. This one. Christy, who is the active active
Video Transcript AI Summary
On 2/11, 462 log entries were overwritten by a script. On 3rd March, 37,686 log entries were overwritten by the same script. On 12th, 330 log entries were overwritten. The EMS admin account is responsible for this. The challenge is that this occurred before an audit, which means the full context of the election is not available. The log file shows that someone purged all the results for the election, deleting all records and files. This happened right before the audit started.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: On 2/11, 462 log entries were overwritten by this script. On 3rd March, 37,686 log entries were overwritten by this same script. On 12th, which is the day before we received the system, there were 330 log entries overwritten by that script. Now the challenge here is that I know that this occurred. I know which account did it.
It was the EMS admin account. You would think that if you were doing an audit the next day, that you would want to have the full context of the election to be audited, but that clearly was not the case in this instance. Sorry.
Speaker 1: Just to clarify. So this is a log file specifically from report report, tallying I'm sorry. Results tallying and reporting, which is the Dominion software, that entry says that someone went into the program and clicked on something that said, I wanna purge all the results for this election. That goes through and deletes all of the records within it. And if you actually take a look, You can see the success.
It's like the 2nd lineup, you know, that it completed successfully, and it literally deletes all of the files On the NAS directory as well, which is where all the results from the election are contained, where all the images from the election are contained, and all those other details. So some Individual went into an application, and they chose specifically, to to run something that would clear all records in the system that was used to generate the official results the day before an audit started.
reSee.it AI Summary
In the 2020 Nevada election, there were alleged irregularities:
- 42,000 people voted twice.
- 1,500 dead people voted.
- 19,000 non-residents voted.
- 8,000 votes from non-existing addresses.
- 15,000 votes from commercial addresses or vacant lots.
- 4,000 non-citizens voted.
Similar claims were made in other swing states. Calls for prosecutions have been made.
@Alissa4TheUSA - ᗩℓιѕѕα♡
This is crazy😲 In the 2020 Nevada election: - 42,000 people voted twice. - 1,500 dead people voted. - 19,000 people who did not live in Nevada voted, and they were not a college student. - 8,000 people voted from a non existing address. - 15,000 people who voted were registered to a commercial address or vacant lot. - 4,000 people who voted were non-citizens. This happened in all of the swing states. We need prosecutions now!
Video Transcript AI Summary
42,000 people in Nevada voted more than once, 1,500 were deceased, 19,000 didn't live in Nevada, 8,000 had non-existent addresses, 15,000 were registered at commercial or vacant addresses, and 4,000 were non-citizens. The speaker asked about voter fraud prosecutions in Nevada, to which the response was not yet.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: 42,000 people in Nevada voted more than once according to your work in this, 42,000 people. 15 1500 people voted in Nevada that were dead. 19,000 people voted though they did not live in Nevada and they weren't a college student. 8,000 people voted from a non existent address, 15,000 people voted though they were registered to a commercial address or a vacant address and 4,000 people, voted in Nevada that are non citizens. My question to you is, in my state when someone votes twice and we do have that occasionally about 50 times a year that that actually occurs in our state, we election in Nevada, do you know of any prosecutions currently going on in Nevada for any voter fraud?
Not yet, senator. And that's extremely
@JDunlap1974 - 🇺🇸🇺🇸Josh Dunlap🇺🇲🇺🇲 ULTRA-MAGA
Poll watcher from the 2020 Presidential election was shocked to find mail-in “absentee” ballots in sequential order, proving voter fraud https://t.co/hZBUHj24oZ
Video Transcript AI Summary
When I started recording ballot numbers and names from mail-in ballots, I noticed they were in sequence, which is unusual. The envelopes had no date, just "November 0-2020." When I questioned this, I was told not to interfere. The ballots were all from the same street in Detroit, with similar signatures and no date stamp. They weren't in the system and were being entered manually. It seemed suspicious.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: When I started, writing down the ballot numbers and the last names of the person of the ballot, the that had the name on the ballot, they were all in sequence. These are absentee ballots, mail in mail in ballots. They cannot be in sequence. 2232 cannot have 2233 next to it because if they're mailed in, they come in all different numbers. And when when I started noticing that these numbers are almost next to each other, like, one or the other was in the middle, but then they were almost next to each other, my my antennas went up.
That's exactly when I thought something is not right here. Then I asked a supervisor. There was not even a date on those, envelopes. It said November 0 dash 2020. There was no second number there.
Then I said, what is the date on this one? Then they got really mad at me. They said, you're not letting us do our job. You're disturbing us. And at that point because we really don't wanna be kicked out, you know, so we were just kinda not challenging anything because we wanna still stay in the room because we barely had anybody.
Not only that, the sequence ballot numbers were all from the same area, like the guarded street in the downtown Detroit. Guardant street sequential ballots, signatures were all alike. They had no date stamp. It's at like, it was empty after 0. There was no 3rd or second or first or nothing.
And, they were none of them were coming up in the system. They were all being entered manually. They even knew that none of these details would even be in the poll book or in the system.
reSee.it AI Summary
The author expresses concern about the perceived rigging of elections, highlighting the ease of voting without an ID. They suggest that the requirement for an ID creates a false sense of security, as a law passed by Democrats in 2020 allows for voting without it. The author shares an anecdote about their Republican neighbor having two votes in a Democratic primary, despite never voting in one before. They believe this is an example of election theft.
@MattForVA - Matt Strickland
Watch how rigged these elections are. I voted with no ID last week to prove to you how easy it is. They'll ask you for your ID, so you have the perception that it's secure. But, while you were asleep in 2020, Dems passed a law that says you don't have to show it. All you have to do is put a name, date, & signature. That's it. My neighbor who is a staunch Republican has two votes on his voting record in a Dem primary. He has not only never voted Dem, he's never voted in a primary, only in general elections. This is just one way they steal elections.
Video Transcript AI Summary
You need to fill out paperwork to vote, even without ID or a driver's license. Just provide your name, date, and signature. No registration is required to vote.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You didn't? No. That's gonna create a problem. You can write, but you're gonna have that's gonna create a problem. Let's see.
You're having to fill out paperwork and you have to enter your team. Gotta fill out paperwork? Yeah. To vote with nobody? Yeah.
But I can still vote? Yes. Okay. Thank you. Alright.
I'll fill out that paperwork. Alright. Okay. Oh, dear. Okay.
No ID. You no driver's license? Did you drive over here? I drove. Yeah.
And you don't have a license? License? No. No license. You got a registration or something in your vehicle?
No. Nothing at all. No address. You don't have a registration? Nothing.
Alright. I can still vote. Right? Yeah. Yeah.
Alright. This is confirmation statement. K. Alright. Let's see.
What do you need? Just go ahead. Select the line name. Mhmm. The date.
June 18th. Right? Mhmm. 2024. I'm gonna have him go ahead and run through the EPP, make sure you're in the right place.
Alright. Name, date, is that all you need? I'm here to vote, but I haven't registered to serve yet. Okay. Okay.
So just name, date, and signature. Right? Yep.
@FFT1776 - Sheri™
Election fraud deniers👇🏻 10,000+ illegal aliens used the “exact same” Social Security number and voted in the Nov 3, 2020 election. This is just in Arizona. Congress knew this and certified a criminal enterprise on Jan 6. https://t.co/elUBb8OzLd
Video Transcript AI Summary
We found 10,000 people sharing the same Social Security number for work. Employers give undocumented workers the number to deduct taxes. The IRS ignores the mismatch and validates it if there's an employer. This helps undocumented workers get driver's licenses and vote. They don't pay taxes, companies do. The government holds a $1.7 trillion slush fund. This dark money generates $100 million in interest monthly. The system benefits both parties.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We discovered 10,000 people using the exact Social Security number. See if this one rings true. You take an illegal. You bring them in. They sign a piece of paper promising to pay taxes.
What they get is a Social Security number so the employers can take out the taxes. Put a pin in that. Here's what they do. In cities like this, let's think of a chicken processor. They will bring in 100 of illegals.
They will spread them out across all of these plants and factories, giving them jobs. They're all using the same Social Security number. The IRS unconnected our names from the Social Security number. Now when you look it up, it just pings to see if there's an employer. If there is, it says it's good.
It validates it. Why do they do that? Because all of these factories are giving them Social Security numbers. The government turns its back on it. As soon as you have a Social Security number and you go over to motor voter, pass the driver's court, test.
Right? You get a driver's license. The person looked, you got a social. You must be a citizen. That's how they pack the roles.
By the way, those guys don't pay taxes anyway. It's taken out by companies. Our government's been sitting on $1,700,000,000,000 slush fund that, that one fund has still in it to this day. So if you want to know where the dark money comes from. By the way, that's what, a $100,000,000 in Per month.
A month in interest. I could go on. I now understand this is why they tried to kill us, and it's not stuff I wanted to know. It's not stuff I wanted to know about my country. It's not stuff I believed, But we have a uni party.
We don't have multiple parties. Everybody's benefited from this at one time or another.
@AndrewPatriot_ - ⭐Andrew⭐45 #MAGAdonian 🗽
Fraud in plain sight! And Democrats said there was no election fraud... https://t.co/mSyIESfgUh
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared concerns about the integrity of the Nevada election, citing claims of multiple votes, deceased individuals voting, and illegal registrations. Despite these allegations, there have been no prosecutions. I believe Congress certified a criminal conspiracy on January 6 and call for arrests.
@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸
And here is, the State of Nevada, CONSPIRACY DAY NOVEMBER 3, 2020 Sen. James Lankford: • 42,000 people voted more than once, • 1,500 resurrection of the dead, • 19,000 didn't live in Nevada, • 8,000 voted from a non-existent address, • 15,000 registered to a commercial address, • 4,000 illegal aliens. • zero prosecutions. And • United States Congress certified a criminal conspiracy on Jan 6. Issue the arrest warrants at once.
Video Transcript AI Summary
42,000 people in Nevada voted multiple times, including 1,500 deceased individuals, 19,000 who didn't reside in Nevada, and 8,000 from nonexistent addresses. Additionally, 15,000 were registered at commercial or vacant addresses, and 4,000 were noncitizens. In our state, we prosecute individuals for voting twice, which occurs about 50 times a year. Of the 130,000 instances of potential voter fraud identified in Nevada's 2020 election, there have been no prosecutions yet. It's crucial to enforce voter integrity laws. While building a fraud case can take time, an honest investigation should lead to charges. Losing the principle of one person, one vote risks authoritarianism.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: 42,000 people in Nevada voted more than once according to your work in this. 42,000 people. 15 1500 people voted in Nevada that were dead. 19,000 people voted though they did not live in Nevada and they weren't a college student. 8,000 people voted from a nonexistent address.
15,000 people voted though they were registered to a commercial address or a vacant address. And 4 1,000 people, voted in Nevada that are noncitizens. My question to you is, in my state, when someone votes twice, and we do have that occasionally, about 50 times a year that that actually occurs in our state, we prosecute individuals that vote twice. Of this 130,000 instances that you have identified from the 2020 election in Nevada, do you know of any prosecutions currently going on in Nevada for any voter fraud?
Speaker 1: Not yet, senator, and that's extremely important. This has to be these laws have to be enforced. We, of course, I I represent the Trump campaign and the campaign's electors. I don't represent the government. We can't bring prosecutions.
But if we are going to enforce voter integrity laws, they must be enforced, and we are confident that although it often takes a long time to put together a fraud case, although it takes prosecutors months, sometimes even years, to go through subpoenas and warrants, and using the the FBI to go investigate these things. Once a good hard look at these cases is examined, an honest look, if we do that, there should be charges brought. Because the the ranking member brought up in his remarks that when you lose the the principle of 1 person, 1 vote, the end result is a is authoritarianism. That
@elonmusk - Elon Musk
This is messed up. Vote Republican in Nevada!
@karma44921039 - karma
How illegal immigrants are getting registered to vote. https://t.co/sADwf80L9m
Video Transcript AI Summary
I discovered the source of how ineligible individuals are being added to voter rolls. It's an organization called the Electronic Registration Information Center (ERIC), led by David Becker, who has a controversial background. ERIC, funded by George Soros, contracts with states to access sensitive DMV records protected under privacy laws. Their membership agreement prevents disclosure of citizenship status, allowing them to add names to voter rolls without confirming eligibility. These names are then shared with the Center for Election Innovation and Research, which received significant funding from Zuckerbucks in 2020.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I found the source of exactly where all these illegals are getting put on the voter rolls, and it's gonna be made public very, very soon. And I'll tell you right now where it is. And it's an organization called the Electronic Registration Information Center. It's led by a guy named David Becker who was involved in a scandal while he was a US attorney, and he essentially contacted the city of Boston while he worked for the DOJ, and the DOJ sued Boston over voting rights claiming that he would help them get out of it. He then worked for PFAW, the People For the American Way, a far left organization.
Then he went on to work for Pew. And with George Soros' money, he created an organization called the Electronic Registration Information Center, which is known as ERIC. And then ERIC contracts with the states to get your DMV records. All that sensitive data that nobody else can get that's protected under the driver's privacy protection act, that's where they're finding out the ineligible voters. That's where they're finding out who in the state isn't registered to vote.
And their membership agreement prohibits you And their membership agreement prohibits you from disclosing to them who is or is not a citizen. So you send all the information to people who live there. Don't tell them if they're citizens or not. And they pump those names onto the voter rolls, and then they circulate it back, and then they give it to the other organization David Becker found, which is the Center For Election Innovation and Research, which is the recipient of all those Zuckerbucks from back in 2020.
@iheartmindy - Mindy MF Robinson 🇺🇸
The Nevada Election shenanigans have begun.... Supposedly the election office was closed Sunday...but when my friend showed up to see what they were up to, she noticed a parking lot full of out-of-state plates and sketchy people refusing to explain what they were doing. https://joehoft.com/2024-steal-nv-clark-county-election-office-closed-sunday-but-out-of-state-workers-show-up-and-observers-not-allowed-in/#google_vignette
2024 STEAL NV: Clark County Election Office Closed Sunday But Out of State Workers Show Up and Observers Not Allowed In | Joe Hoft
Extremely SUSPICIOUS Activity at the Clark County, Nevada Elections Office on Sunday Before Election Guest post from Martel Maxim It's Sunday afternoon, just two days before the Election of a Lifetime that will determine if America lives or dies, and something isn't quite right in the County where the world famous city of Las Vegas
joehoft.com
@Robert_Cr59 - ⭐⭐⭐Robert Crosby⭐⭐⭐
Amazingly, every glitch, error, and accident nationwide favors one party. https://conservativeroof.com/early-votes-mysteriously-shift-in-favor-of-democrats/
HOW IS THIS POSSIBLE? — LATEST UPDATE: 3000 Votes in Texas 'Mysteriously' S...
WHAT THE HELL?
conservativeroof.com
@BoLoudon - Bo Loudon
🚨BREAKING: It's been 80 MINUTES since polls in Nevada closed. Despite this, there's not a single vote reported. WHAT'S GOING ON?
@EndWokeness - End Wokeness
Non-citizen was just arrested for voting in 3 elections. But remember, it never happens. https://t.co/Mqaso0wYsy
