TruthArchive.ai - Related Post Feed
@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives
BREAKING: Everyone is saying the quiet part out loud about President Trump now.
Video Transcript AI Summary
I don't care who I offend, but if Trump gets convicted of a crime and can still run for president, I'll vote for him. He's funny and I want to see what he does. Trump is hilarious, so I'm voting for him. That's all I have to say.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I don't mean no harm, and I don't give a damn who this offends. But if that nigga Trump gets convicted of this crime and he could still run for president, I'm voting for his ass. I'm voting for that nigga. I'm voting for him. If that nigga gets convicted and he can still run for president just to see what the fuck he do because that nigga funny now.
Trump is funny as hell. I'm voting for him. I'm telling you right now. Okay? So just mix me with it.
@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury
At his rally in West Palm Beach, former President Trump recounted how Israeli PM Benjamin “let us down” for not being part of the strike on Iranian general Qasem Soleimani, but then tried to “take credit” for the operation. He backed out... Can you read between the lines?
Video Transcript AI Summary
Israel and the US planned to take out Soleimani, who posed a threat to military bases in the Middle East. However, Israel backed out at the last minute. Undeterred, the US proceeded with the operation and successfully eliminated Soleimani. The speaker expresses disappointment in Israel's decision and criticizes their attempt to take credit for the operation. They emphasize the need for accurate intelligence and caution against underestimating Iran's military capabilities. The speaker also suggests that a deal with Iran could have been reached if the election had not been rigged.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Don't forget, you know, I did have a bad experience with Israel though. When we took out Soleimani, it was us at Israel working as a group. And we knew where he was, we knew how he was coming in, we knew the plane, we knew everything. We worked on it for weeks, for months actually, but we worked on it for weeks. The night before, no, I I don't think this has ever been told.
They'll say, oh, it's classified information. Well, maybe it is, but I don't think so. The night before this happened, and by the way, Biden's got a lot of problem with those documents, he's moving them to Chinatown, he's moved them all over, I didn't, and I come under the Presidential Records Act, he doesn't. He does it because he was vice president and he was a senator. As a senator, you're not allowed to do it.
As a president, I am because I come under the president. I could do whatever I want, but I did nothing wrong. And then they go after me, but they don't go after him, but we'll see what happens. But with all of the different things that happened, we took abuse like nobody and we had to do this because we heard Soleimani was going to be blowing up 5 of our really big military bases in areas all over the Middle East, he was going to be blowing them up. He was a very bad guy, very smart guy, but very bad guy, he was a leader of their military for a long time.
In fact, the Ayatollah, they were all afraid of him. I actually think they were happy when this happened, okay? I think they were happy. I remember the prime minister of Pakistan said to me, it was the biggest event in the history of the Middle East. This is big stuff, this was a big event.
He said, I left my office, Khan, a very good man. He left his office, he said, I went home. This was the biggest event in my life, and he was a great cricket player, he was like, the Willie Mays, the Mickey Mantle, the Babe Ruth of cricket, he was a great cricket player. He became handsome guy, great guy, he became the prime minister of Pakistan, he said when I heard that he was dead, this was the biggest event I've ever seen, I've ever been involved in. And I left my office and I went home for 1 week and I contemplated.
He said, I've never seen anything like it. It was big stuff. This was much bigger than anybody, but we had to do it. He was going to blow up our installations all over, kill many people, many, many people and wounded people beyond recognition. And Israel was going to do this with us and it was being planned and working on it for months and now we had everything all set to go.
And the night before it happened, I got a call that Israel will not be participating in this attack. Nobody's heard this story before, but I like to tell it to Club 47 because you've been so loyal and so beautiful. And I said I said, what does this mean? We're working on it with them. Why?
They're not they didn't tell us why, sir, but they're not doing it. This was a day before, I said, I don't like that, that's not good. I looked at one of my generals, who's fantastic, a warrior. I'm telling you, we have unbelievable military, unbelievable warriors. Just not the guys you see on television.
They're real steps, real dubs. But these guys are warriors. They don't want to be on television. They want to win fights, okay? They want to win battles.
And I said to them, General, what do you want to do? Sir, we can do whatever you'd like to sir, we can finish it ourselves, sir, if you'd like. I said, well do we need them? Not at all, sir. I said, so what do you want to do general?
Sir, we have it under control if you wanna do it. If you don't wanna do it, we understand. Whatever you say, sir, is okay with us. He said, let's do it. Let's do it.
Let's do it. Because what this guy did to our soldiers, what this guy did to so many people, including many civilians, including many of his own people, just blew them to pieces by the tens of thousands. Let's do it. And he came on in the plane and we followed him right from the situation room, we followed the whole thing and about 15 seconds later, it was all over. And we did it.
But I'll never forget, I'll never forget that BB Netanyahu let us down. That was a very terrible thing, I will say that. And, so when I see, sometimes, the intelligence, you talk about the intelligence or you talk about some of the things that went wrong over the last week, they've got to straighten it out because they're fighting potentially a very big force, they're fighting potentially Iran. And when they have people saying the wrong things, everything they say is being digested by these people because they're vicious and they're smart. And boy are they vicious because nobody's ever seen the kind of sight that we've seen.
Nobody's ever seen it. But they cannot play games. So we were disappointed by that, very disappointed, but we did the job ourselves and it was absolute precision, magnificent, beautiful job. And then, Bibi tried to take credit for it. That wasn't good.
That didn't make me feel too good, but that's all right. So they got to strengthen themselves up because, they're fighting a big force and, you know, Iran's got close to a 3,000,000 person army military. That's big stuff, you know. That's no longer the minor leagues. We had them so in check.
They wouldn't do a thing against us. They wouldn't do a thing. They wanted to make a deal so badly. If that election wasn't rigged, we would've had that thing done so fast
@TheWakeninq - 1776
FLASHBACK Dems: Maniac Trump is going to allow war to break out https://t.co/KRPA9uDR19
Video Transcript AI Summary
We are committed to fighting for as long as it takes, supporting the president. However, there are concerns about the potential for World War 3 due to President Trump's decisions. We must not underestimate the dangers of a deranged president with control over nuclear weapons. It is crucial to find a way to avoid nuclear war and put an end to forever wars responsibly. Congress needs to restrain the president and not give him green lights for war. The military-industrial complex prioritizes short-term profit over America's security needs, and it's time to end these forever wars. Unlimited war reflects a lack of moral, particularly within the Republican party. Elections have consequences.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's worth fighting for for as long as it takes. And that's how long we're gonna be with you, mister president, for as long as it takes. We'll do it. Thank you.
Speaker 1: Well, we're on the brink of World War 3 because Donald Trump took the worst possible option given to him in a slideshow.
Speaker 2: In this country, we have begun to over Estimate the dangers of impeachment and underestimate the dangers of a deranged president retaining control over a nuclear hyper power.
Speaker 3: We cannot wait around While Donald Trump is in control of the nuclear weapon
Speaker 1: Your objection to potentially going into World War 3 cannot be procedural. Biggest danger of the Trump presidency is that we are always just a Trump whim away From nuclear war
Speaker 2: They say it's World War 3, but I'm looking out my window. It's very quiet in those smoking craters out there.
Speaker 1: Has to be told that it's his job to avoid World War 3.
Speaker 4: 1 democratic congressman, sent me a note this evening and say this President wants this war.
Speaker 1: A future administration needs to find a way to put an end to the forever wars.
Speaker 4: They're in a new normal, and
Speaker 1: the new normal is forever war. But there's a, you know, big difference between ending the forever wars, which he wants to do responsibly, and what seems to be president Trump's Rather itchy Twitter thing.
Speaker 5: The objective needs to be, to end the forever wars.
Speaker 3: If congress does not wanna go to war, Now is the time to start putting restraints on this president. And, again, they've been giving him green lights all the way.
Speaker 1: Maybe it's because we're gonna take on the military industrial complex and end and end endless wars.
Speaker 6: Every American needs to wake up to the Inanigans of the military industrial complex, and how much 100 of 1,000,000,000 of dollars are spent only because of short term profit And for, for military defense contractors as opposed to America's legitimate security needs.
Speaker 0: It's long past time we end the forever wars.
Speaker 7: All of this though risks more of a proxy war than I think we're gonna have a stomach for. And ending our forever wars so that we can better serve our constituents at home.
Speaker 8: When It comes to unlimited war. We seem to be able to be to to invent that numb that money very easily. And to me, it belies a lack of moral that people have right now, especially Republican party.
Speaker 0: And that's why there are elections. They have consequences.
reSee.it AI Summary
Javier Milei, Argentina's new President, is being compared to Donald Trump. Known as "The Shock Therapy" Maestro, he aims to expose corruption, pedophilia, and money laundering. This election outcome is monumental, causing panic among globalists. Milei fearlessly speaks out, reminiscent of the 2016 US election. With ISO-20022 in effect, unexpected appointments may occur. Today marks the death of globalism, leading to significant upcoming events. Donald Trump seems to support Milei. Exciting times lie ahead.
@Prolotario1 - Ariel
🚨Breaking: Javier Milei, the Argentina Donald Trump who has been labeled "The Shock Therapy" Maestro has won the presidency. This is one man that will have the power to Red-Pill his nation about all the corruption, pedophilia, money laundering etc. Do you all know how monumental this is? Do you know how many globalist are panicking right now? This guy does not bite his tongue at all. This is equivalent to the 2016 election in the US. But thus time with someone who is not afraid to call out anything you would only see on 4chan.
@Prolotario1 - Ariel
We will see how this unfolds. Because he has some interesting connections. But even so those can not even interfere at this point. Because now that ISO-20022 is live you will naturally see people put in position who wouldn't normally be allowed. You all have to understand how crucial ISO-20022 was to the ceasefire regarding Hamas. They all know globalism died today in multiple ways. So you are about to see many major events take place after today.
@SeekingAnon - Drewski
Trump knew, He spoke the truth, and They attacked him for it. MSM has to go. We are the News now. https://t.co/cZRf8s84Mm
Video Transcript AI Summary
At age 59, I walked off the bus as a different man. Although I'm not proud of it, what I said was just locker room talk. Bill Clinton, on the other hand, has done far worse things to women. He has a history of abusive behavior towards women, and Hillary Clinton has attacked those same women. One of them, Kathy Shelton, was raped at 12 years old, and Hillary represented her rapist and laughed at her. Bill Clinton was impeached, lost his law license, and had to pay a fine to Paula Jones. So, when Hillary brings up my words from 11 years ago, it's disgraceful and she should be ashamed of herself.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Walked off that bus at age 59. Were you a different man, or did that behavior continue until just recently? And you have 2 minutes for this.
Speaker 1: Told you. That was locker room talk. I'm not proud of it. I am a person who Has great respect for people, for my family, for the people of this country, and certainly I'm not proud of it, but that was something that, happened. If you look at, Bill Clinton, far worse, minor words, and his was action.
His was what he's done to women. There's never been anybody in the history Politics in this nation that's been so abusive to women. So you can say any way you wanna say it, But Bill Clinton was abusive to women. Hillary Clinton attacked those same women and attacked them viciously, 4 of them here tonight. One of the women who is a wonderful woman at 12 years old was raped at 12.
Her client She represented, got him off, and she's seen laughing on 2 separate occasions, laughing at the girl who was raped. Kathy Shelton, that young woman, Is here with us tonight. So don't tell me about words. I am absolutely I apologize for those words, But it is things that people say. But what president Clinton did, he was impeached.
He lost his license to practice law. He had to pay an $850,000 fine to one of the women, Paula Jones, who's also here tonight. And I will tell you that when Hillary brings up a point like that and she talks about words that I said 11 years ago, I think it's disgraceful, and I think she should be ashamed of herself if you wanna know the truth.
reSee.it AI Summary
Remember when Trump called Pence delusional, Netanyahu a betrayer, and Mcenany a Rino? Don't forget the opposition was once working with Trump. This is a "Live Sting Operation" where crimes continue to be committed for all to see. Trump won't be arresting anyone, but the military will. The border crisis and second lockdowns will be the tipping point. The new economy will emerge during the lockdowns, just like the Federal Reserve absorption and voter fraud in 2020. Space Force technology will stop the Deep State's plans. Dong Jingwei has evidence of CCP's plans and is in protective custody. Search engines are controlled by agencies, making it hard to find information on patriots. Flynn used people like Raiklin to rig elections. Think, it's not hard.
@Prolotario1 - Ariel
We Forget So Easily: The Bottom Line Remember when D. Trump called Mike Pence delusional? Remember when D. Trump called Bibi Netanyahu betrayed him? Remember when he D. Trump said he was not a fan of Jeffrey Epstein? Remember when he called Kayleigh Mcenany a Rino? Remember when D. Trump said no cabinet post for Rudy Giuliani in his 2nd administration? Remember when Donald Trump called Bill Barr a coward? Remember when all these people were supposedly working with D. Trump who are now his opposition? Remember when Michael Flynn was invited to a D. Trump rally? Me neither because it never happened for a reason. Why would this be any different for Kash Patel? Why do we have to go over this again? How many times do you all want me to be right once again? How many times do you have to experience betrayal before you understand that you are watching a "Live Sting Operation"? Everyone that has been in your face constantly doing interviews, constantly releasing books, constantly requesting donations, constantly doing documentaries, constantly selling products, are not the people who will be joining you in "The New Republic". Did you all forget what D. Trump said about Michael Flynn? People you need to study what a sting operation is. All of you want D. Trump to be bold and blunt like I am when it comes to ousting opposition out in the open. No, D. Trump wants them to continue committing the crimes so you can see them for who they are. He knows many of you have your hearts open for people that is trying to take D. Trump down. Not to mention that D. Trump is not the one who will be arresting anyone. He signs the documents that allow the military to handle that. Which is called Continuity of Government-(COG). Meaning all of the things you all want to be obvious that will cause chaos & confusion will not be allowed to. This means out in the open (For Now) things have to carry on as normal until it no longer has to once enough of "The Normies" wake up. We are touching on that basis with the Border Crisis. But the tipping point will come once the 2nd lockdowns commence. This will not be what you presume a working plan that will succeed by the Cabal. This is the bridge to the other side I have been telling you all about. Remember, by the time this happens we will be transitioning into the new economy. And under the guise of the lockdowns is when this transformation will take place. No different then what happened in 2020 when the Federal Reserve was absorbed by the US Treasury. Or when all the celebrity homes went up for sale. Or when the voter fraud was occurring that resulted in the water marked ballots catching everyone in the act. Everything during that time was working in your favor. Which is why Donald Trump is able to call his second term "retribution". Because all the work to bring down the Cabal's and their henchmen will finally bare fruit. Especially now since they have all the names of those who were money laundering through Ukraine & Israel. Remember, they now have technology through Space Force to stop 85% of the Deep State plans and objectives. Did you all forget my last post already addressing this? Remember Dong Jingwei? He was given over 1 TB = 75 million pages of evidence containing 20 years of CCPs plans. Which included execution & current infiltration to destroy the U.S including creating the SARS, Covid 19 bioweapons & all companies & people in involved including HRC, weapons trade, money laundering, creating weapons for climate change (Evergreen Ship), U.S. officials. Deep State run military bases, DC and MSM Media. He is currently in protective custody within one of our major Mil intel agencies. This involved Obama, Gates, Fauci, CDC, Biden, WHO, HRC, Merrill Lynch, JP Morgan, CIA Rothschilds, Vatican and the Israeli Kazarian Crime Syndicate. Donald Trump has possession of all of this. People you have to understand your search engines for the most part are controlled by the 3 letter agencies. Which is why it's hard to find info on all the people you consider patriots who you think are trying to save the Republic. How many of you would have known Michael Flynn was using people like Ivan Raiklin to rig elections in key states that Joe Biden allegedly won? I. Raiklin is used to blackmail political figures to pressure them to audit votes. Why do you think you couldn't get Michael Flynn to address the 2020 theft? He worked in intelligence for decades so why did it take people who didn't to get to the bottom of what actually happened? Please, think people. It's not a hard thing to do.
@KatTheHammer1 - Kat™ The Hammer ⚒️
Even Joy Reid admits the feckless wonder in the Whitehouse is going to start "another fucking war" Hot mic moment! 😂 https://t.co/Ujyyhh3Ls4
Video Transcript AI Summary
President Biden expressed his willingness to address the border issue and take action if Congress is committed to solving it. He emphasized the need for Congress to pass a bill that would enable quick and effective solutions. The speaker also mentioned the possibility of shutting down the border to resolve the issue promptly.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Over the weekend, president Biden said he's ready to take action if congress is serious about solving the border issue. If that bill were the law today, I'd shut down the border right now and fix it quickly, and congress needs to get it done. Starting another fucking war.
@islantstudio - Chester Tam
Trump was right https://t.co/GKkSEETvni
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims that the biggest scandal was when their campaign was spied on, but the other person disagrees, saying there is no evidence. The speaker insists that it is all over the place and that it was bad for Biden. The other person explains that they can't put on things they can't verify. The speaker continues to assert that it has been verified and that they got caught. The other person denies knowing about it.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Biggest scandal was when they spied on my campaign. They spied on my campaign.
Speaker 1: There's no real evidence of that.
Speaker 0: Of course, there is. It's all over the place. Leslie, they spy to my campaign and they get caught.
Speaker 1: Can I say something? You know, this is 60 minutes, and we can't put on things we can't verify.
Speaker 0: Put it on because it's bad for Biden.
Speaker 1: We can't put on things we can't verify.
Speaker 0: Leslie, they spy to my campaign.
Speaker 1: Well, we can't verify.
Speaker 0: Totally verified. No. It's been just go down and get the papers. They spied on my campaign. They got caught.
Speaker 1: No. And then they
Speaker 0: went much further than that, and they got caught. And you will see that, Leslie. And you know that, but you just don't wanna put it on the ear.
Speaker 1: As a matter of fact, I don't know that.
@realDonaldTrump - Donald J. Trump
“PRESIDENT TRUMP WARNED US!” https://t.co/6oSVDd1wXg
Video Transcript AI Summary
The Biden-Harris administration is accused of releasing thousands of illegal immigrants convicted of violent crimes, including murderers and rapists. Kamala Harris is accused of lying. It is claimed that "an undocumented immigrant is not a criminal." Donald Trump warned about this and promises to deport "these thugs," secure the border, and make streets safe again. Trump states, "I'm Donald J. Trump, and I approve this message."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The Biden Harris administration just admitted they released thousands of illegal immigrants convicted of violent crimes. Kamala lied.
Speaker 1: An undocumented immigrant is not a criminal.
Speaker 0: They released murderers.
Speaker 1: An undocumented immigrant is not a criminal. Human traffickers. An undocumented immigrant is not a criminal.
Speaker 0: Rapists, all released under Kamala. President Trump warned us. He'll deport these thugs, secure the border, and make our streets safe again. I'm Donald j Trump, and I approve this message.
@EndWokeness - End Wokeness
MEDIA: Trump says he wants to place Liz Cheney in front of a firing squad. REALITY: Trump is taking about how DC politicians send our kids off to war from comfortable offices while never putting themselves in those war zones. https://t.co/Pa3L6csQov
Video Transcript AI Summary
She's a radical war hawk, always eager to send troops into danger without understanding the real consequences. It's easy to advocate for war from the comfort of Washington, but I wonder how she'd feel if faced with the reality of combat. In meetings, she consistently pushed for military action, showing a reckless disregard for the lives at stake.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: She's a radical war hawk. Let's put her with a rifle standing there with 9 barrel shooting at her. Okay? Let's see how she feels about it, you know, when the guns are trained on her face. You know, they're all war hawks when they're sitting in Washington in a nice building saying, oh, gee, Will.
Let's, send, let's send 10,000 troops right into the mouth of the enemy. But she's a stupid person. And I used to have I'd I'd have meetings with a lot of people, and she always wanted to go to war with people. So
@RickyDoggin - A Man Of Memes
Another reason why they hate him... He tells the truth. https://t.co/5G5wytFEMT
Video Transcript AI Summary
He wants to appear tough, but it's easy to take advantage of vulnerable people, like an elderly woman. Many in the audience are donors and special interests, which affects their support. The RNC has confirmed that the audience is filled with donors, and the lack of enthusiasm for me stems from my refusal to accept their money. I prioritize doing what's right for the American public over financial contributions. I'm the only one here committed to saving the country without relying on donations.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Let me just you know, he wants to be a tough guy. A lot of times, you'll have you'll have and and it doesn't work very well with How tough is it to say, like, property from an elderly woman? Let me talk. Quiet. Now so out of time a lot of times, That's all of his donors and special interests out there.
So it's what it is. That's what and by the way, let me just tell you. We needed tickets. You can't get them. You know who has the tickets for the, I'm talking about to the television audience?
Donors, special interest, the people that are putting up the money. So it is, the RNC told us we have all donors in the audience, and the reason they're not loving me, the reason they're not excuse me. The reason they're not loving me is I don't want their money. I'm gonna do the right thing for the American public. I don't want their money.
I don't need their money. And I'm the only one up here that can save
@AlexPfeiffer - Alex Pfeiffer
Did you know Kash Patel was given a DOJ award for work he did investigating and prosecuting terrorists under the Obama administration? https://t.co/WjuXYFAHTK
@MJTruthUltra - MJTruthUltra
Oh boy… did Trump just expose Netanyahu and Israel’s influence on American Politics? 👀 Trump shared a clip of Jeffrey Sachs discussing how Obama and Netanyahu orchestrated wars by scaring the shit out of Americans. https://t.co/NboqtwWR4b
@andrealynn_rn2 - Andrea Lynn
It’s one big club…and Trump is in it. You’ve been warned. https://t.co/nD9gyyn9qW
reSee.it AI Summary
He had me until this point. Why lie about something so trivial that's all over social media and easily verifiable? You can hear the conflict in his voice, caught between different opinions. It’s a bad, bad judgment call.
@RedTeamActual - R E D
He had me until…..here. Why lie about something so trivial that has been plastered all over social media and anyone with a heartbeat can verify? You can hear the split second conflict in his voice, trying to listen to different voices telling him different things….YES, NO, YES, YES, NO, NO, WHAT… Bad, bad judgement call.
@CatchUpFeed - Catch Up
Adam Schiff is terrified of Kash Patel being confirmed because he will have to answer for his role in the Russiagate hoax. https://t.co/KsMRXlB2z3
Video Transcript AI Summary
I believe Adam Schiff is the most responsible person for spreading disinformation on Russiagate. He claimed he had evidence of Donald Trump colluding with Russia, feeding lies to the mainstream media to push a false narrative for four years. As someone who ran the Russiagate investigation while Schiff was the minority leader on the House Intel Committee, he had access to the same information.
The released deposition transcripts prove Schiff knew there was no factual basis for the Russiagate narrative. So, when he tweets about being scared that Twitter will be a landing ground for disinformation, it's hypocritical. Twitter has been a place where people spread defamation and attack others, with clear hypocrisy on who they allow on the platform.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: He, Adam Schiff, the single most in the person who is responsible for spreading disinformation on Russiagate, saying he had evidence Donald Trump colluded with Russia, saying the intelligence community had all this information, and then going out to the mainstream media and feeding them these lies because they were in bed with him to spread a false narrative for four years and bamboozle the world into believing that Russiagate actually happened and Donald Trump conspired with Russia. It was a total falsehood. Adam Schiff knew it at the time. I was running the Russiagate investigation. He was the, leader of the minority on the House Intel Committee.
Devin Nunes was the then chairman. He had access to all the information we had access to. The transcripts are the best example, the 60 some odd transcripts that I took at depositions of of of cabinet secretaries, intel officials, DOJ, FBI, Fusion GPS, the all the like. We finally forced those deposition transcripts to light, and what do they show? The headline, Adam Schiff knew the entire time there was no factual basis to perpetuate the Russiagate narrative.
So when a guy like that issues this tweet, I just think it's America should pause and say the King Kong of disinformation is now coming up and saying he's all of a sudden scared that Twitter is going to be, the the the landing ground for disinformation. When you and I have been talking about it, right, Lisa, over the last few years, Twitter has been, the ground where people spread defamation, where people attack others mercilessly. And Twitter's hypocrisy on who they let on their platform and who they kick out has been on full display for years. They've suspended folks like, obviously, president Trump, Babylon b, and all these other journalists who are actually doing fact based reporting because they had the audacity to say
@Lisahudsonchow7 - Lisa 💃🏻💋🌹🍷
When did Donald Trump become a racist? 🔥🔥🔥🔥 He nailed it! https://t.co/gje9Q5CNeI
Video Transcript AI Summary
When did Trump become a racist? Only when they told you so? Was he a problem when he was with the Clintons? People are upset about the ad he took out against the Central Park 5, but back then, all the news pointed to their guilt. Plus, he was a registered Democrat at the time, and the DA, police chief, and mayor were all Democrats too.
Where's the outrage for corporations buying sweets at the DNC or abortion mobiles near the convention? Biden was racist, and some say he was only VP to balance the ticket. Hillary Clinton was a Goldwater girl who said, "bring them to heel" about us. Is racism only a problem with bad PR? An apology doesn't undo decades of racist policies. But Trump passed the First Step Act with Kim K. advocating for black people more than some black people are. When do we hold everyone accountable?
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Was Oprah dumb when she was hanging out with that racist? Was Whoopi Goldberg dumb when she was hanging out with that racist? So when did he become a racist? When they told you he was. Was he a racist?
Was he a problem for Hillary Clinton when he stood up at Chelsea Clinton's wedding? When he was golfing with Bill Clinton for years? Make it make sense. Oh, and again, this is not me advocating for Donald Trump, but I need to give you an example that you cannot you cannot argue. People are upset because Donald Trump's a racist because he took out an $85,000 ad in the newspapers against the exonerated five, formerly known as the Central Park 5.
Right? That's a problem. That's problematic because he said they needed to get the death penalty. You know what everybody leaves out of that conversation? Two things.
The first is all we had was the information that was being presented to us on the news. At the time. And at the time, all that information said that we got them. We got these kids. They ain't saying nothing about rounding them up or how they rounded them up or this, that, and third.
They sat up there and they present go look at a forget me. Go look at Ava DuVernay's Netflix movie. Go look at all the documentaries made about these guys. Now here's the gag. At the time when Donald Trump did that, he was a registered Democrat.
Not only that, he was a private citizen. Not only that, the district attorney, the assistant district attorney, the chief of police, the mayor, all of them happened to be Democrats. But that didn't stop anybody from dealing with the fact that they paraded them brothers up on that stage at the DNC in 2024, like, oh, Donald Trump's the problem. Oh, so but I didn't hear any of them issue an apology for what they did to railroad those boys for a decade and some change. How does that make sense?
Matter of fact, one of the assistant prosecutor is still a huge donator a a huge donor to the Democratic National Convention Democratic National Committee. So I'm trying to understand how that makes sense. And then, by the way, where's all your smoke for these corporations that were buying million dollar sweets at the DNC. You care about black life so much. Why were you okay with them having abortion mobiles a block away from the Democratic National Convention?
If if we're gonna talk about preserving life, if we're gonna talk about racism, we're gonna talk about systemic things. You have to talk about it regardless of who you like or who has the best PR or who says the things you don't like. That's my issue. Y'all know for a fact Joe Biden was a racist. Always been a racist.
And the only reason he was vice president under Obama is because they wanted to balance the ticket. So if you put a Negro in there, let's make sure we put somebody who was mentored by Strom Thurman, who eulogized Robert Byrd, who was an exalted Cyclops in the Klan. Oh, you mean the guy who who said that Barack Obama was a what what was the word? Oh, the first mainstream clean, articulate black person? Excuse me?
That was okay? Oh, you you can't get a Dunkin' Donut unless you got unless you got a little Indian in you. He said that. You're okay with that. You're okay with Hillary Clinton being a Goldwater girl, who was a car carrying racist and segregationist, who also said, we need to bring them to heel.
Them meaning you and me. Because we were teenagers at the time when she said that, and she was the first lady. So is racism a problem, or is racism with the right amount of PR a problem? When is it just, hey, this is wrong, and it needs to be wrong? Oh, but he apologized for it.
Yeah. But his apology don't do nothing for the thirty plus years of racist policies that have affected us. But then again, when you got somebody creating a First Step Act, getting these people out for nonviolent drug offenses, you got Kim Kardashian. And I can't stand Kim Kardashian neither. You got her advocating for more black people than I see black people are advocating for black people.
Not making a bunch of noise on the senate floor. Not pontificating on somebody's podcast. Literally taking their time, money, energy, and efforts and putting it out there. So I'm trying to understand when is it enough that we hold everybody accountable, not the people they just tell you to like.
@JJCarrell14 - J.J. Carrell
I warned about this! Buckle up America because we are heading straight into a war. Wait until shots are fired and dead bodies line the streets and then we will see all the Anti-Americans descend! Look at what our govt created! https://t.co/fyNuteTob1
@AdameMedia - ADAM
The man who knew the World Trade Centre buildings would be brought down 6 years before the actual event and then said they were “good” for his state now wants you to fight a war with Iran. https://t.co/RdXI0Z2FV9
Video Transcript AI Summary
In the 1990s, the speaker stated that the West doesn't understand militant Islam. The speaker wrote a book in 1995, asserting that if the West doesn't recognize the suicidal nature of militant Islam, the next event would be militant Islam bringing down the World Trade Center. The speaker reiterated that the West doesn't understand militant Islam and repeated the claim from their 1995 book about militant Islam and the World Trade Center.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In in the nineteen nineties, and I said that the West really doesn't understand militant Islam. So I wrote a book in 1995, and I said that if if the West doesn't wake up to the suicidal nature of militant Islam, the next thing you'll see is the the militant Islam is bringing down the World Trade Center. I said that the West really doesn't understand militant Islam. So I wrote a book in 1995, and I said that if if the West doesn't wake up to the suicidal nature of militant Islam, the next thing you'll see is the the militant Islam is bringing down the World Trade Center.
reSee.it AI Summary
Trump pointed out that the ongoing wars in Iraq and Syria stem from Netanyahu's influence. He claims Netanyahu continues to push for conflict with Iran. It’s a reminder that things aren’t always as they appear, and Trump seems to be aware of the deeper implications.
@KAGdrogo - ĐⱤØ₲Ø🇺🇸
Never forget Trump posted a video explaining that all the endless wars in Iraq and Syria, etc. came from Netanyahu. Netanyahu “is STILL trying to get us to fight Iran to this day” Nothing is what it seems. TRUMP KNOWS. https://t.co/EKfwIUsaMr
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims the Syrian war narrative is false, stating Obama ordered the CIA to overthrow the Syrian government four years before Russia intervened. They allege the New York Times rarely reported on Operation Timber Sycamore.
Regarding the 2003 invasion of Iraq, the speaker asserts it was based on "phony pretenses." They claim focus groups were used to determine how to "sell" the war to the American public.
The speaker attributes the Iraq war to Netanyahu, who allegedly believed toppling Iraq, Syria, and Iran was the only way to eliminate Hamas and Hezbollah. They state Netanyahu has been trying to get the U.S. to fight Iran and has influenced U.S. politics to achieve his goals, resulting in "endless wars." The speaker concludes that the terms "democracy versus dictatorship" are not sensible.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The war in Syria. And you may actually hear from grown up reporters who are lying through their teeth or ignorant beyond imagining that, oh, the war in Syria. Yes. Russia intervened in Syria. Well, do you know that the that Obama tasked the CIA to overthrow the Syrian government starting four years before Russia intervened?
What kind of nonsense is that? And how many times did the New York Times report on Operation Timber Sycamore, which was the presidential order to the CIA to overthrow Bashar al Assad? Three times in ten years. This is not democracy. This is a game, and it's a game of narrative.
Why did The US invade Iraq in 02/2003? Well, first of all, it was completely phony pretenses. It wasn't, oh, we were so wrong. They didn't have weapons of mass destruction. They actually did focus groups in the February to find out what would sell that war to the American people.
Abe Schultzky, if you wanna know the name of the PR genius. They did focus groups on the war. They wanted the war all the time. They had to figure out how to sell the war to the American people, how to scare the shit out of the American people. It was a phony war.
Where did that war come from? You know what? It's quite surprising. That war came from Netanyahu, actually. You know that?
It's weird. And the way it is is that Netanyahu had from 1995 onward the theory that the only way we're gonna get rid of Hamas and Hezbollah is by toppling the governments that support them. That's Iraq, Syria, and Iran. And the guy's nothing if not obsessive. And we're he's still trying to get us to fight Iran this day, this week.
He's a deep, dark son of a bitch. Sorry to tell you. Because he's gotten us into endless wars, and because of the power of all of this, in The US politics, he's gotten his way. But that war was totally phony. So what is this democracy versus dictatorship?
Come on. This is these are not even sensible terms.
@KAGdrogo - ĐⱤØ₲Ø🇺🇸
https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/113789043423746072
@KAGdrogo - ĐⱤØ₲Ø🇺🇸
Never forget Trump posted a video explaining all the endless wars in Iraq and Syria, etc. came from Netanyahu. Netanyahu “is STILL trying to get us to fight Iran to this day” Nothing is what it seems. https://t.co/EKfwIUsaMr
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims the war in Syria began with Obama tasking the CIA to overthrow the Syrian government four years before Russia intervened. They allege the New York Times rarely reported on Operation Timber Sycamore, which was the presidential order to the CIA to overthrow Bashar al Assad.
Regarding the 2003 invasion of Iraq, the speaker asserts it was based on phony pretenses and that focus groups were used to determine how to sell the war to the American people. They claim the war originated with Netanyahu, who believed toppling Iraq, Syria, and Iran would eliminate Hamas and Hezbollah. The speaker accuses Netanyahu of pushing the U.S. into endless wars and trying to instigate a war with Iran. They conclude that the concepts of "democracy versus dictatorship" are not sensible terms.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The war in Syria. And you may actually hear from grown up reporters who are lying through their teeth or ignorant beyond imagining that, oh, the war in Syria. Yes. Russia intervened in Syria. Well, do you know that the that Obama tasked the CIA to overthrow the Syrian government starting four years before Russia intervened?
What kind of nonsense is that? And how many times did the New York Times report on Operation Timber Sycamore, which was the presidential order to the CIA to overthrow Bashar al Assad? Three times in ten years. This is not democracy. This is a game, and it's a game of narrative.
Why did The US invade Iraq in 02/2003? Well, first of all, it was completely phony pretenses. It wasn't, oh, we were so wrong. They didn't have weapons of mass destruction. They actually did focus groups in the February to find out what would sell that war to the American people.
Abe Schultzky, if you wanna know the name of the PR genius. They did focus groups on the war. They wanted the war all the time. They had to figure out how to sell the war to the American people, how to scare the shit out of the American people. It was a phony war.
Where did that war come from? You know what? It's quite surprising. That war came from Netanyahu, actually. You know that?
It's weird. And the way it is is that Netanyahu had from 1995 onward the theory that the only way we're gonna get rid of Hamas and Hezbollah is by toppling the governments that support them. That's Iraq, Syria, and Iran. And the guy's nothing if not obsessive. And we're he's still trying to get us to fight Iran this day, this week.
He's a deep, dark son of a bitch. Sorry to tell you. Because he's gotten us into endless wars, and because of the power of all of this, in The US politics, he's gotten his way. But that war was totally phony. So what is this democracy versus dictatorship?
Come on. This is these are not even sensible terms.
reSee.it AI Summary
The FBI has raided John Bolton's home and office regarding classified documents, highlighting his role in the Project for the New American Century (PNAC), which advocated for military intervention in the Middle East. PNAC's founders, including Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld, sought a "New Pearl Harbor" to justify the invasion of several countries. General Wesley Clark warned of these plans in 2001. I believe President Trump is aware of the true culprits behind 9/11, and I anticipate accountability for those involved.
@LightOnLiberty - Bridgett Fertig
FBI raids former National Security Advisor John Bolton's home and office over classified documents! Anti-Trump, warmongering John Bolton was one of the direct signatories of several PNAC letters leading to 9/11, including the notable one in 1998 urging President Bill Clinton to remove Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq. Bolton's involvement with PNAC directly reflects his warmongering foreign policy, championing the overthrow of world leaders in various countries for his masters in the Military Industrial Complex. The Military Industrial Complex who organized PNAC to set up the 9/11 attacks as a premise to in invade, destroy & conquer the Middle East, got even richer, while the Fake News corporations [They] also own, speaks nothing of these issues and attacks President Trump for trying to broker WORLD PEACE! You don't hate the media enough. Founders of PNAC included Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, and Robert Kagan - who is married to Victoria Nuland. All of these members would later serve in the Bush administration, championing for regime change overseas which was accomplished due to 9/11 a few years after PNAC was founded.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Breaking news: The FBI is searching John Bolton's home outside DC and Maryland in Bethesda, Maryland. The New York Post is reporting this is related to classified documents. The FBI hasn't provided an official comment. On social media, posts from the FBI director and the deputy director read: "no one is above the law. FBI agents on a mission." Bolton, a former ambassador and National Security Adviser, was in the room with President Trump making key decisions on national security and foreign policy, and he has been highly critical of Trump. Bolton previously was accused of including classified information in his 2020 book, The Room Where It Happened, and had his life threatened by Iran after Trump pulled his security detail. This comes a day after Patel revealed that former FBI director James Comey had authorized leaks of classified documents, while "misleading congress" just before the twenty sixteen elections.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We actually start this hour with breaking news. The FBI is currently raiding the home of former ambassador and former National Security Advisor John Bolton. Let's get straight out to News Nation's Libby Dean, who's live at the White House with all of these details and Libby. This has to do with classified information. I mean, what's going on here?
Speaker 1: Markey, this is really early on here, but I'm learning from a source that the FBI is searching John Bolton's home currently. It's just outside of DC and Maryland, and, this is obviously breaking news. But at one point, of course, this was Trump's national security adviser. It was in the room with president Trump making key decisions when it came to national security, foreign policy. Of course, we've seen him, become highly critical of president Trump, and now we're learning the FBI is conducting a search of John Bolton's home.
The New York Post is reporting this is related to classified documents. Now we have reached out to the FBI. They haven't provided an official comment, but we can take a look at social media where we've heard from both the FBI director as well as the deputy director. That's, of course, Cash Patel, is the FBI director who posted, quote, no one is above the law. FBI agents on a mission.
It's safe to assume here that that mission is likely this, search that is being conducted at John Bolton's home. Now there's a lot of history here, but we, of course, saw, Bolton had previously had his life threatened by Iran and then president Trump pull his, detail, his security detail. That's been the latest development. Also, Bolton previously was accused of including classified information in his 2020 book, The Room Where It Happened, and Bolton, of course, frequently critical of president Trump's national security foreign policy approach. And this actually comes a day after Patel real revealed that, former FBI director James Comey had authorized leaks of classified documents, while, quote, misleading congress just before the twenty sixteen elections.
Now there's a lot of history here, Markey. This is obviously breaking news. You're taking a look right there of what's taking place on the ground outside of John Bolton's home in Bethesda, Maryland. That's about thirty, forty five minutes from the White House here. But this is, of course, president Trump's, during his first term national security adviser in his home now being searched by the FBI, a major development this early morning here in DC.
Marquis.
Speaker 0: Libby Dean, thank you so much. Live from the White House. Keep us posted. We'll check back in as we continue to, learn more this morning.
@LightOnLiberty - Bridgett Fertig
PNAC was a project that insisted we needed a "New Pearl Harbor Event" ( 9/11 ) that would allow our foot into the Middle East to set up the premise to invade & destroy the governments of 7 countries in 5 years: Iraq Syria Lebanon Libya Somalia Sudan Iran In 2001, retired 4-Star U.S. Army General named Wesley Clark warned the American people that the United States Government had plans to overthrow seven countries in 5 years. Under the guise of 9/11, it was accomplished with Bush’s invasion, later continued on being carried out with Barack Obama. The United States Government has committed Treason of the highest caliber, the likes of which will shock the entire world.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Shortly after 9/11, a Pentagon staffer says a colleague told him 'we're going to war with Iraq,' with no new evidence linking Saddam to Al Qaeda. A few weeks later, a memo 'describes how we're gonna take out seven countries in five years, starting with Iraq and then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, and Sudan, and finishing off Iran.' Iran saw U.S. presence in Iraq as both a threat and a blessing; they were 'building up their own network of influence' and sometimes gave 'military assistance and training' to insurgents and militias. The administration allegedly sought to pay for regime change—'asking congress to appropriate $75,000,000' and 'supporting terrorist groups apparently who are infiltrating and blowing up things inside Iraq Iran.' Hersh notes a 'special planning group' to bomb Iran and Saudi funding of Sunni groups and the risk that a U.S. pull-out could empower Al Qaeda.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Right after 09:11 about ten days after 09:11, I went through the Pentagon and I saw secretary Rumsfeld and and deputy secretary Wolferwitz. I went downstairs just to say hello to some of the people on the joint staff who used used to work for me. And one of the generals called me and he said, sir, you gotta come in you gotta come in and talk to me a second. I said, well, you're too busy. He said, no.
No. He says, we've made the decision we're going to war with Iraq. This was on or about the September 20. I said, we're going to war with Iraq. Why?
He said, I don't know. He said, I guess they don't know what else to do. So I said, well, did they find some information collect connecting Saddam to Al Qaeda? He said, no. No.
He says there's nothing new that way. They just made the decision to go to war with Iraq. He said, I guess it's like we don't know what to do about terrorists, but we got a good military and we can take down governments. And he said, I guess if the only tool you have is a hammer, every problem has to look like a nail. So I came back to see him a few weeks later.
And by that time, we were bombing in Afghanistan. I said, we still going to war with Iraq? And he said, oh, it's worse than that. He said he reached over on his desk. He picked up a piece of paper.
He said, I just he said, I just got this down from upstairs, meeting the secretary of defense's office today. And he said, this is a memo that describes how we're gonna take out seven countries in five years, starting with Iraq and then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and finishing off Iran. I said, is it classified? He said, yes, sir. I said I said, well, don't show it to me.
And I saw him a year or so ago. And I said, you remember that? He said, sir, I didn't show you that memo. I didn't show it to you.
Speaker 1: I'm sorry. What did you say his name was?
Speaker 0: I'm not gonna give you his name.
Speaker 1: So go through the countries again?
Speaker 0: Well, starting with Iraq, then Syria and Lebanon, then Libya, then Somalia and Sudan, and then back to Iran. So when you look at Iran, you say, is it a a replay? It's not exactly a replay. But here's the truth, that Iran from the beginning has seen that the presence of The United States in Iraq was a threat, a blessing because we took out Saddam Hussein and the Baathists. They couldn't handle them.
We took care of it for them. But also a threat because they knew that they were next on the hit list. And so, of course, they got engaged. They lost a million people during the war with Iraq, and they got a long and unprotectable, unsecurable border. So it was in their vital interest to be deeply involved inside Iraq.
They tolerated our attacks on the Baathists. They were happy we captured Saddam Hussein, but they're building up their own network of influence. And to cement it, they occasionally give some military assistance and training and advice either directly or indirectly to both the insurgents and to the militias. And in that sense, it's not exactly parallel because there has been, I believe, continuous Iranian engagement. Some of it legitimate, some of it illegitimate.
Mean, can hardly fault Iran because they're offering to do eye operations for Iraqis who need medical attention. That's not an offense that you can go to war over perhaps, but it is an effort to gain influence. And the administration has stubbornly refused to talk with Iran about their perception, in part because they don't want to pay the price with their domestic Our US domestic political base, the right wing base, but also because they don't want to legitimate a government that they've been trying to overthrow. If you were Iran, you'd probably believe that you were mostly already at war with The United States anyway since we've asserted that their government needs regime change. So, and we've asked congress to appropriate $75,000,000 to do it, and we are supporting terrorist groups apparently who are infiltrating and blowing up things inside Iraq Iran.
And if we're not doing it, let's put it this way, we're probably cognizant of it and encouraging it. So it's not surprising that we're moving to a point of confrontation crisis with Iran. My point on this is not that the Iranians are good guys, they're not, but that you shouldn't use force except as a last, last, last resort. There is a military option, but it's a bad one.
Speaker 1: I wanted to get your response to Seymour Hirsch's piece in the New Yorker to two key points this week. Reporting the Pentagon's established a special planning group within the office of the Joint Chiefs of Staff to plan a bombing attack on Iran, that this is coming as the Bush administration and Saudi Arabia are pumping money for covert operations into many areas of the Middle East, including Lebanon, Syria, and Iran in an effort to strengthen Saudi supported Sunni Islam groups and weaken Iranian backed Shias. Some of the covert money has been given to jihadist groups in Lebanon with ties to Al Qaeda. Fighting the Shias by funding with Prince Bandar and then with US money not approved by Congress funding the Sunnis connected to Al Qaeda.
Speaker 0: Well, I don't have any direct information to confirm it or deny it. It's certainly plausible. The Saudis have taken a more active role. You know, the the Saudis
Speaker 1: You were just in Saudi Arabia?
Speaker 0: Mhmm.
Speaker 1: You just came back
Speaker 0: from Saudi Arabia? Well, the Saudis have basically recognized that they have an enormous stake in the outcome in Iraq. And they don't particularly trust the judgment of The United States in this area. We haven't exactly proved our competence in Iraq. So they're trying to take matters into their own hands.
The real danger is and one of the reasons is so complicated is because let's say we did follow the desires of some people who say, just pull out and pull out now. Well, yeah, we we could mechanically do that. It would be ugly, and it might take three or four months, but you could line up the battalions on the road one by one, and you could put the gunners in the Humvees and cock load and cock their weapons and shoot their way out of Iraq. You'd have a few roadside bombs, but if you line everybody up, there won't be any roadside bombs, maybe some sniping. You can fly helicopters over, do your air cover, you probably get safely out of there.
But when you leave, the Saudis have gotta find someone to fight the Shias. Who are they gonna find? Al Qaeda. Because the groups of Sunnis who would be extremist and willing to fight would probably be the groups connected to Al Qaeda. So one of the weird inconsistencies in this is that were we to get out early, we'd be intensifying the threat against us of a super powerful Sunni extremist group, which was now legitimated by overt Saudi funding in an effort to hang on to a a toehold inside Iraq and block Iranian expansionism.
@LightOnLiberty - Bridgett Fertig
President Trump KNOWS! "He was one of the people that forced Bush to do the ridiculous bombings in the Middle East. He wants to always kill people." "He could be a very unpatriotic guy. We're going to find out." Treason Doesn't Pay Well in the End! https://t.co/ukWw51pDEc
Video Transcript AI Summary
When I hired him, he served a good purpose by pushing for the ridiculous bombings in The Middle East. He wants to kill people and is very bad at what he does, but that worked for me because when he’s quiet, he’s a quiet presence; in meetings, leaders fear him and would give me everything. He could say something bad about Trump; he’ll always do that, but he really doesn’t talk. He’s quiet. I could walk into a room with him and a foreign country would cave. He’s not a smart guy, but he could be a very unpatriotic guy. I know nothing about it. I just saw it this morning. They did a raid. DOJ briefing? They’ll brief me probably today. It’s not necessary. I could know about it. I could be the one starting it. I’m the chief law enforcement officer, but I feel that it’s better this way.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I when I hired him, he served a good purpose because as you know, he was one of the people that forced push to do the ridiculous bombings in The Middle East about he, you know, he he wants to always kill people. And, he's very bad at what he does, but he worked out great for me because every time he doesn't talk, he's like a very quiet person, except on television. He could say something bad about Trump. He'll always do that. But but he really doesn't talk.
He's quiet. And I'd walk into a room with him with a foreign country, and the foreign country would give me everything because they said, oh, no. They're gonna get blown up because John Bolton is there. He's a not a smart guy, but he could be a very unpatriotic guy. I mean, we're gonna find out.
I know nothing about it. I just saw it this morning. They did a raid. Do you expect, DOJ to brief you on this? They'll be they'll brief me.
Probably today sometime. And the foreign minister I don't wanna I tell Pam and I tell the group. I don't wanna know about it. Just you have to do what you have to do. I don't wanna know about it.
It's not necessary. I could know about it. I could be the one starting it. I'm actually the chief law enforcement officer, but I feel that it's better this way.
@LightOnLiberty - Bridgett Fertig
@kellyannelu Trump knows who did 9/11. And they're ALL going down, one by one.
@joma_gc - Bad Hombre
Makes sense why John Bolton was panicking over Kash Patel’s nomination. https://t.co/ocTPj47OMq
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared my thoughts on Dr. John R. Virgil, a prominent doctor in Albuquerque, who stated that Charlie deserved to die and labeled the murder as just. I also encouraged anyone with tips to email me at dcbhigbyy@gmail.com, requesting links to social media profiles and posts.
@camhigby - Cam Higby 🇺🇸
Prominent DOCTOR in Albuquerque New Mexico says Charlie DESERVED TO DIE and calls the murder “JUST” Meet Dr. John R. Virgil. He is a managing Partner at JRV Medical Group, and a board certified physician. Here are his public Facebook posts about Charlie’s murder. https://t.co/1qBlcM6T6i
@camhigby - Cam Higby 🇺🇸
Email me tips at dcbhigbyy@gmail.com Make sure to include links to every post, LinkedIn, and a social media profile with name and face.
@davidicke - David Icke
The Trump warning from months ago - it was obvious all along why he was installed a second time. https://t.co/VeApmcEpdd
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 1 describes a scenario in which troops are on the streets in Los Angeles and Washington DC, with Trump saying he will deploy troops in other cities and aiming to unseat Maduro in Venezuela due to oil, while disregarding stated justifications. He notes these developments as examples of what he has warned about, arguing that in the United States these moves come from a leader who claims to oppose them. He contends that Alex Jones is promoting the same policies that he says Trump is introducing, including a plan to use troops to intervene in Venezuela and to deploy troops into Mexico against the Mexican government, citing drug cartels as a pretext.
Speaker 1 then connects these events to a broader historical pattern, tracing them to technocracy and the concept of a technate—an intended global government run by appointed technocrats and bureaucrats rather than elected politicians. He asserts that Elon Musk’s grandfather, Holderman, supported technocracy in the United States and that the technate movement in the 1930s aligned with Adolf Hitler. He references maps from the 1930s showing a technate extending from Venezuela through Central America, Mexico, the United States, and Canada, ending in Greenland. He claims this vision of technate relates to efforts to position Greenland as an American territory and to the idea of reshaping North American governance into a non-elective, globally coordinated structure under a world government.
Speaker 1 asserts that moves to intervene in Venezuela, deploy troops into Mexico, and the push for Greenland as a territory fit into the unfolding technate plan. He emphasizes that, from his perspective after decades of analysis, these elements “fit together,” and that even people who oppose some aspects may still be supporting components of the same global dystopia conspiracy. He notes that his synthesis has become clearer over time, contrasting it with how the same ideas seemed bewildering in earlier years.
Speaker 0 briefly shifts to directing readers to the video description for further reading and to obtain his latest book, which is positioned as streamlining these interconnections. He mentions his new book as designed to demonstrate how the various elements align into a single conspiracy framework.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In February and March 2026, I'll be back on the road in Hull, Gateshead, Derby, and in Colchester. 2026 is when they want to cross the line as fast as they can into an AI controlled humanity. We stand up now or we regret it forever. That's four dates, and you can get the tickets in the link below.
Speaker 1: So now we have troops on the streets in Los Angeles. We have troops on the streets in Washington DC. We have the dictator Trump saying he's gonna introduce troops on the streets in other cities. He wants to unseat Maduro in Venezuela because of all the oil they have. Never mind the excuses he gives.
They always do that. It's because of the all all the oil there. And we're seeing, ironically, everything that I've been warning about coming to fruition in The United States, everywhere else too, but in The United States, via a man who claims to oppose what he's introducing. There's there's no better example of someone who has sold out to a colossal extent, in indeed, totally, than Alex Jones. I was pointing this stuff out a long time ago, and then along came Alex Jones later, but still a long time ago.
And he was talking about all these things that Trump is introducing, and he was opposing them. He was warning about them. And now, day after day, he's promoting them. The latest one, which I found absolutely staggering last night, is that he's supporting Trump's desire to use troops to unseat Maduro in Venezuela and to put troops into Mexico against the will of the Mexican government using the excuse of drug cartels or whatever. But if you put this thing together in a much more expanded way, you can go back to Elon Musk's grandfather, a guy called Holderman, who was operating in Canada, and he was pushing something called technocracy.
The Technate, they called it. The technate technocracy is a form of government, which they want global, globally, in which no longer do you have elected politicians. That's why they're putting so many moronic politicians into power because they're trying to undermine public support for elected politicians. You look at the UK cabinet, there's not a brain cell to rub together. Not two brain cells to rub together there in the cabinet of the UK, including the prime minister, Starman.
You look at the cabinet and the government of Trump in The United States, same. I'm sure you'll find you look out all over Europe, you'll find the same too. So the idea is that you have a government of appointees, of technocrats, of bureaucrats, of people running health systems, etcetera, etcetera, appointed people. And the tech nate that Elon Musk's grandfather wanted and was supported by people in The United States, and the technocracy movement in the nineteen thirties supported Adolf Hitler, by the way, they were planning a technate area that went from where? You can see the maps, the old maps from the nineteen thirties that goes from Venezuela in South America all the way through Central America, including Panama and Mexico, up through The United States, up through Canada, and guess where it ends in the North?
Greenland. And when you look at targeting Venezuela, moving troops into Mexico, saying we want Canada to be the fifty first state, which he never mentioned in the election campaign, and suddenly he comes to office and he's all over it, And why they want to include Greenland as an American territory is it's the tech nate unfolding, and these tech nates, are designed to have their like all over the world under a world government, which again would be appointed not elected. So when you've been doing it as long as I have, thirty six years now, these things all fit. But if you're new to it, it's bewildering, and I understand why. It was bewildering to me in 1990.
You don't see how the things fit, and therefore, I've just finished a new book which is designed specifically to put these elements together and show how it all fits together because I see people, genuine people, who are opposing this but supporting that when that and this are both part of the same conspiracy for global dystopia. If you
Speaker 0: want to read more and watch more of my content, then go to the description under the video where you can buy my books. The latest one is the road map, where you can get tickets for public events, and how you can subscribe to a fantastic video channel called iconiciconic.com.