reSee.it - Related Post Feed
@naomirwolf - Dr Naomi Wolf
Holy heck, is this real??
@hugh_mankind - New World Odor™
Remember that time when Nobel Prize Winner Prof. Luc Montagnier said: "The Covid Vaccine Is Creating The Variants" and that the vax campaign is "a scientific error as well as a medical error. It's an unacceptable mistake"?? It sure seems like he was absolutely right.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers discuss the impact of mass vaccination on the spread of COVID-19. They argue that the vaccination campaign has led to an increase in cases and deaths, particularly among young people with blood clotting issues. They claim that the variants of the virus are a result of the antibodies produced by the vaccine, which either kill the virus or force it to mutate. They also suggest that the antibodies created by the vaccine actually facilitate infection. The speakers criticize the decision to vaccinate during an ongoing epidemic and argue that the new variants are a result of the selection process caused by vaccination.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Quand on regarde les courbes de l'OMS, depuis qu'on a vacciné en janvier, les courbes de contamination explosent et également le nombre de morts, notamment des jeunes, avec de thromboses tout ça. Quel est votre regard sur cette vaccination massive, est dans une nation massive alors qu'il y aurait des traitements qui marchent, qui fonctionnent et pas cher.
Speaker 1: C'est une énorme erreur, n'est-ce pas C'est une erreur Scientifique, il y a une faute médicale si on peut dire enfin c'est inacceptable Dans l'histoire, on on notera le bilan un jour de tout ça, n'est-ce pas Car c'est effectivement la vaccination qui a créé les variants, le virus de de Chine n'est-ce pas,
Speaker 2: à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à à
Speaker 1: Des anticorps produits par un vaccin, et qu'est-ce qui va faire le virus ou bien mourir ou bien se trouver une solution. Les nouveaux variants sont vraiment la la production la résultante des vaccinations. Et donc vous voyez Je suis de près si vous voulez des expériences qui sont faites in situ, c'est-à-dire sur des patients, des malades qui sont devenus infectés par Le corona après une vaccination. Et je veux vous montrer que ce qui est apparu, c'est un virus variant Qui résistent à la vaccination.
Speaker 0: Comment peut-on vacciner en période épidémique Expliquez-moi.
Speaker 1: C'était impensable. Le silence si vous voulez, beaucoup de gens savent ça. Les épidémiologistes le savent tout ça. C'est sur des anticorps produits par le le virus qui permettent À l'infection de plus forte, vous voyez. C'est ce qu'on appelle les antibody de pending helensten, c'est-à-dire des anticorps qui favorisent une infection.
L'anticorps va se fixer sur le virus et à ce moment-là, il y a des récepteurs aux anticorps que nous avons dans nos macrophages et caetera qui vont à ce moment-là piquer le virus pas par hasard mais enfin du fait même qu'il est lié à des anticorps. Est clair que les nouveaux variants sont créés par la sélection des anticorps produits par la vaccination. D'accord.
@Thekeksociety - DR. Kek
1995 SPEECH "THE VACCINES WILL TURN PEOPLE INTO ZOMBIES!"
Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, the speaker discusses a man named Pierre Gilbert who talked about forced blast schemes in 1995. The speaker claims that this video cannot be found on YouTube due to censorship and suggests using a private search engine like DuckDuckGo. The video mentions the contamination of bloodstreams through mandatory vaccinations called Vlaskeins, which supposedly turn people into zombies. The speaker references liquid crystals in the brain cells and low-frequency waves that inhibit thinking. They also mention the connection between these ideas and the deployment of 5G towers. The speaker encourages viewers to avoid getting the Vlaskein vaccine and asks for comments on the topic.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hey, guys. Just wanted to show you a quick video of this man named Pierre Gilbert from back in 1995 talking about forced blast schemes that would be coming in the future and how they will turn people into zombies. Now, keep in mind, you can't find this video on YouTube, guys. I made a video about this about how YouTube is extremely censored nowadays. You can't find this video on YouTube.
I've tried. It doesn't work. You got to go on a completely separate private search engine to find videos like this. So you can't just find a video like this by typing it in on YouTube. It won't work that way because YouTube, it will just censor the results that pop up.
I had to go on DuckDuckGo to find this video. But, yeah, let's get to the video and I'll read the translation for you all. In biological destruction, there are organized tempests on the magnetic fields. What will follow is the contamination nation of the bloodstreams of mankind, creating intentional inspection. This will be enforced via laws that will make Laskan nations mandatory and these Vlaskeins will make possible to control troll people.
The Vlaskins will have liquid crystals that will become hosted in the brain cells, which will become microreceivers of electromagnetic field where waves of very, very low frequencies will be sent. And through these low frequency waves, people will be unable to think. You'll be turned into a zombie. Don't think of this as a hypothesis. This has been done.
Think of Rwanda. So, yeah, guys. Like I said, you can go on my story, swipe up, and you can go to the video on YouTube and you can see what people are saying in the comment section. There's a lot of, interesting things people are saying. I mean, it sounds pretty true.
I don't see why, you know, this would be a fake video of somebody named Pierre Gilbert just saying random stuff, you know, and, you know, it's definitely something to think about. So if you haven't gotten the vlastken yet, don't get it. If you got the first of the 2 doses, don't get the second one. Just don't get it, you know. Don't, you know.
If you got the first one, then the damage might already be be done, but, you know, If you already got the first one by mistake, don't get the second one. Just don't do it. Right? And, when he talks about the low frequencies will be emitted that kinda makes you think of 5 g. Maybe that's why these 5 g towers.
Maybe that's why they want 5 g towers everywhere, and maybe there's something in the blast scheme that'll be activated by these frequencies. So who knows guys? But Leave a comment. Let us know what you think.
reSee.it AI Summary
Bill Gates' alleged vaccine agenda is scrutinized in a report by James Corbett. Gates faced criticism for his actions in India, where he reportedly influenced health authorities to test experimental vaccines on the population. His foundation's investments in pharmaceutical companies raised concerns about conflicts of interest. Despite accusations of causing polio cases, Gates remains free. The report questions the motives behind his vaccine initiatives.
@Inversionism - Inversionism
Bill Gates and his decade of vaccines. This is a great report from James Corbett on Bill gates and his nefarious agendas to inject every human being on the planet with experimental vaccines. What he did in India should have put him in prison and dissolved his foundation. He captured and took over their health authorities to use the country as a bunch of guinea pigs for the gardasil and polio vaccines, while making those pharma companies his foundation held stock in, billions of dollars. Since starting his "decade of vaccines", his vaccine investments were said by him to have provided a 20 to 1 return. Remember his foundation is a supposed non-profit... so absurd. As I'm sure some of you have read, he gave a ton of people in India polio with his toxic shots, somewhere around half a million, and yet he remains a free man.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Bill and Melinda Gates announced a $10 billion commitment to research and develop vaccines for the world's poorest countries. This pledge was part of a larger agenda that aimed to increase profits for pharmaceutical companies, give the Gates Foundation more control over global health, and allow Bill Gates to shape the future for billions of people. Gates has been adamant that the world cannot return to normal until a vaccine for COVID-19 is developed, and this message has been echoed by many heads of state and health officials. However, there are concerns about the safety and rushed development of an experimental vaccine. The Gates Foundation has a history of influencing public health policies and funding vaccine development.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: $10,000,000,000. I mean, just speak about the magnitude of that. That is by far the biggest commitment of the Foundation, isn't it Bill? I mean, this is by far the largest.
Speaker 1: That's right. We've been spending a lot on vaccines. With this commitment, over 8,000,000 additional lives will be saved. So, it's one of the most effective ways that health in the poorest countries can be dramatically improved.
Speaker 2: In January of 2010, Bill and Melinda Gates used the World Economic Forum at Davos to announce the staggering $10,000,000,000 commitment to research and develop vaccines for the world's poorest countries, kicking off what he called a decade of vaccines.
Speaker 1: Today, we're announcing a commitment over this next decade, which we think of as a decade of Vaccines having incredible impact. We're announcing that we'll spend over $10,000,000,000 on vaccines.
Speaker 2: Hailed by the Gates funded media.
Speaker 1: For the record, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation is a NewsHour underwriter.
Speaker 2: And applauded by the pharmaceutical companies who stood to reap the benefits of that largest. The record setting commitment made waves in the international national community, helping to underwrite a global vaccine action plan coordinated by the Gates funded World Health Organization. But contrary to the Gates' own PR been that this $10,000,000,000 pledge was an unalloyed good and would save 8,000,000 lives. The truth is that this attempt to reorient the global health economy was part of a much a bigger agenda. An agenda that would ultimately lead to greater profits for big pharma companies, greater control for the Gates Foundation over the field of global health, and greater power for Bill Gates to shape the course of the future for billions of people around the planet.
This is Bill Gates' plan To vaccinate the world. You're tuned in to The Corbett Report. Given Gates' pledge to make this a decade of vaccines, it should come as no surprise that since the dawn of this coronavirus crisis, He has been adamant that the world will not go back to normal until a vaccine has been developed.
Speaker 1: We're going to have this intermediate period of opening up, And it won't be normal until we get an amazing vaccine to the entire world. The vaccine is critical because until you have that, things aren't really going to be normal. They can open up to some degree, But the risk of a rebound will be there until we have very broad vaccination. They won't be back to normal until we either have that Phenomenal vaccine or therapeutic that's like over 95% effective. And so we Have to assume that's going to be almost 18 months from now.
And then the final solution, which is a year to 2 years off is The vaccine. So we've got to go full speed ahead on all 3 fronts. Just to head off the conspiracy theorists, maybe we shouldn't call the vaccine the final solution. Maybe just the
Speaker 3: best solution.
Speaker 2: Okay. More interestingly, since Gates began delivering the same talking point in every one of his many media appearances of late. It has been picked up and repeated by heads of state, health officials, doctors, and media talking heads, Right down to the scientifically arbitrary, but very specific 18 month time frame.
Speaker 1: Realistically, COVID nineteen will be here for the next 18 months or more. We will not be able to return to normalcy until we find a vaccine or effective medications. The hard fact is, until we find a vaccine, going back to normal means putting lives at risk.
Speaker 4: This will be the new normal until a vaccine is developed.
Speaker 3: The only thing that will really allow life As we once knew it, to resume is a vaccine.
Speaker 5: Obviously, we continue to work on the vaccines, but the vaccines have to be down the road by Probably 14, 15, 16 months. We're doing great on the vaccines.
Speaker 2: The fact that so many heads of state, Health ministers and media commentators are dutifully echoing Gates' pronouncements about the need for a vaccine will not be surprising to those who saw last week's exploration Of how Bill Gates monopolized the global health. As we have seen, the Gates Foundation's tentacles have penetrated into every corner of the field of public health. 1,000,000,000 of dollars in funding and entire public policy agendas are under the control of this man, an unelected, unaccountable software developer With no medical research experience or training. And nowhere is Gates' control of public health more apparent than in the realm of vaccines. Gates launched the decade of vaccines with a $10,000,000,000 pledge.
Gates helped develop the global vaccine action plan administered by the Gates funded World Health Organization. Gates helped found Gavi, the vaccine alliance, aiming to develop healthy markets for vaccine manufacturers. Gates helped launch Gavi with a $1,000,000,000 donation in 2011, going on to contribute $4,100,000,000 over the course of the decade of vaccines.
Speaker 1: And so I'm pleased to announce to you that we're pledging an additional $1,000,000,000 Thank you. All right, thank you. It's not everyday we give away $1,000,000,000.
Speaker 2: One of the Gates Foundation's core funding areas is vaccine development and surveillance, which has resulted in Channeling of 1,000,000,000 of dollars into vaccine development, a seat at the table to develop vaccination campaigns in countries around the globe, And the opportunity to shape public thinking about Bill Gates' pet project of the past 5 years, preparing rapid development and deployment of vaccines In the event of a globally spreading pandemic.
Speaker 1: If anything kills over 10,000,000 people in the next few decades, It's most likely to be a highly infectious virus. Whether it occurs by the quirk of nature or at the hand of a terrorist, epidemiologists Showed through their models that a respiratory spread pathogen would kill more than 30,000,000 people in less than a year. And there is a reasonable probability of that taking place in the years ahead.
Speaker 6: Many The high profile personalities have been gathering at this year's World Economic Forum in Davos, which aims to discuss and deal with the globe's most pressing issues. Amongst them is the Microsoft founder, Bill Gates. His foundation is investing 1,000,000 in the Coalition For Epidemic Preparedness Innovations to help combat infectious diseases. Here's some of what he had to say about his push to develop new vaccines.
Speaker 1: Unfortunately, it takes many years to do a completely new vaccine. The design, Safety review, the manufacturing, all of those things mean that an epidemic Can be very widespread before that tool would come along. And so after Ebola, the Global Health Community talked a lot about this, Including a new type of vaccine platform called dnaRNA that should speed things along. And so This Coalition For Epidemic Preparedness Initiative, CETI, CEPI, is Three countries, Japan, Norway, Germany, and 2 foundations. Wellcome Trust, We've worked on a lot of things and our Foundation, Gates Foundation, coming together to fund, Actually trying to use that platform and make some vaccines.
And so that would help us in the future.
Speaker 7: We know vaccines can protect us.
Speaker 8: We just need to be better prepared. So let's Come together. Let's research.
Speaker 7: And invest. Let's save lives.
Speaker 2: Given Gates' mammoth investment in vaccines over the past decade, his insistence that
Speaker 1: Things won't go back to truly normal Until we have a vaccine that we've gotten out to basically the entire world.
Speaker 2: Is hardly surprising. What should be surprising is that this strangely specific and continuously repeated message that we will not go back to normal until we get a vaccine in 18 months Has no scientific basis whatsoever. Medical researchers have already conceded that a vaccine for SARS CoV two may not even be possible, Pointing to the inability of researchers to develop any kind of immunization against previous coronavirus outbreaks, like SARS or MERS. But even if such a vaccine were possible, serious concerns remain about the safety of developing, testing, and delivering such an amazing vaccine to the entire world in this remarkably short time frame. Even proponents of vaccine development Openly worry that the rush to vaccinate billions of people with a largely untested experimental coronavirus vaccine will itself present grave risks to the public.
One of these risks involves disease enhancement. It has been known for over a decade that vaccination for some viral infections, including coronaviruses actually enhances susceptibility to viral infection or even causes infections in healthy vaccine recipients.
Speaker 4: Now, the issue of safety is something that I want to make sure the American public understand. It's not only safety when you inject somebody and they get Maybe an idiosyncratic reaction, they get a little allergic reaction, they get pain. There's safety associated, Does the vaccine make you worse? And there are diseases in which you vaccinate someone, they get infected with what you're trying to protect them with, And you actually enhance the infection.
Speaker 2: This is no mere theoretical risk. As researchers We're trying to develop a vaccine for the original SARS outbreak discovered. The vaccine actually made the lab animal subjected to it more susceptible to the disease.
Speaker 9: One of the things that we're not hearing a lot about is the unique potential safety problem of coronavirus vaccines. This was First found in the early 1960s with the respiratory syncytial virus vaccines that children and it was done here in Washington with the NIH in Children's National Medical Center that some of those kids who got the vaccine actually did worse. And I believe there were 2 deaths And the consequence of that study because what happens with certain types of respiratory virus vaccines, you get immunized and then when you get actually exposed to the virus, you get this kind of paradoxical immune enhancement phenomenon. And what how and we don't entirely understand the basis of it, But we recognize that it's a real problem for certain respiratory virus vaccines. That killed the RSV program for decades.
Now the Gates Foundation is taking it up again. But when We started developing coronavirus vaccines and our colleagues we noticed in laboratory animals that they started to show some of the same immune pathology that resembled what had happened 50 years earlier.
Speaker 2: This specific issue regarding coronavirus vaccines Is exacerbated by the arbitrary and unscientific 18 month time frame that Gates is insisting on for the vaccine's development. In order to meet that deadline, vaccine developers are being urged to use new and largely unproven methods for creating their experimental immunizations, Including DNA and mRNA vaccines.
Speaker 10: For a self described wartime president, victory over COVID nineteen equals a vaccine.
Speaker 4: I hope we're gonna have a
Speaker 5: vaccine, and and we're going to fast track it like you've never seen before.
Speaker 10: Adding Trump style branding, the administration launched Operation Warp Speed, a multibillion dollar research and manufacturing effort to shorten the typical year plus vaccine development timeline.
Speaker 4: We're gonna start ramping up production with the companies involved And you do that at risk. In other words, you don't wait until you get an answer before you start manufacturing. You at risk proactively Start making it assuming it's going to work.
Speaker 10: You're thinking 18 months even with all the work that you've already done to this point and the planning something that you are taking with lots of different potential vaccinations and building up
Speaker 1: for that now? Yes. So there's an approach called RNA vaccine that people like Moderna, CureVac and others are using that In 2015, we'd identified that as very promising for pandemics and for other applications as well. And so if everything goes perfectly, with the RNA approach, we could actually beat the 18 months. We don't want to create unrealistic expectations.
Speaker 7: So the concept of an RNA vaccine is let's inject the RNA molecule that encodes for the spike protein.
Speaker 11: It's making your cell do the work of creating this viral protein that is going to be recognized by your immune system and trigger, the development of these antibodies.
Speaker 7: Our bodies won't make a full fledged infectious virus. They'll just make a little piece and then learn to recognize it and then Get ready to destroy the virus if it then later comes and unbathes us. It's a relatively new, unproven technology, and there's still no example of the RNA vaccine that's been deployed worldwide in the way that we need for the coronavirus.
Speaker 11: There's some possibility for unforeseen adverse effects.
Speaker 8: So this is all new territory, whether it would elicit that protective immune response against this virus is just unknown right now.
Speaker 2: Rushing at warp speed to develop a new vaccine using experimental technology and then mass producing and delivering billions of doses to be injected into Basically the entire world before adequate testing is even done, amounts to one of the most dangerous experiments in the history of the world. One that could alter the lives of untold numbers of people. That an experimental vaccine developed in a brand new way and rushed through with a special. Special shortened testing regime should be given to adults, children, pregnant women, newborn babies and the elderly alike Would be in any other situation unthinkable. To suggest that such a vaccine should be given to the entire planet Would have been called lunacy mere months ago.
But now the public is being asked to accept this premise without question. Even Gates himself acknowledges the inherent risks of such a project, but his concern is not for the lives that will be irrevocably altered in the event that the vaccines Cause damage to the population. Instead, he is more concerned that the pharmaceutical companies and the researchers are given legal immunity for any such damage.
Speaker 1: If we have 1 in 10,000 side effects, that's way more 700,000 People who will suffer from that. So really understanding the safety at gigantic scale across all age ranges, pregnant, male, female, undernourished, existing comorbidities, it's very, very hard and that actual decision of a decision of, okay, let's go and give this vaccine to the entire world. Governments will have to be involved because There will be some risk and indemnification needed before that can be decided on.
Speaker 2: As we have already seen, in the arena of global health, what Bill Gates wants is what the world gets. So it should be no surprise that immunity for the big pharma vaccine manufacturers and the vaccination program planners is already being worked on. In the US, the Department of Health and Human Services issued a declaration that retroactively provides liability immunity for activities related to medical countermeasures against COVID nineteen, including manufacturers, distributors, and program planners of any vaccine used to treat, diagnose, Cure, prevent, or mitigate COVID nineteen. The declaration was issued on March 17th, but retroactively covers any activity back to February 4th, 2020. The day before the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation announced an emergency $100,000,000 to fund treatment efforts And to develop new vaccines for COVID nineteen.
The plan to inject everyone on the planet with an experimental vaccine Is no aberration in Bill Gates' envisioned decade of vaccines. It is its culmination. The decade of vaccines kicked off with a kicked off with a Gates funded $3,600,000 observational study of HPV vaccines in India that according to a government investigation, Violated the human rights of the study participants with gross violations of consent and failed to properly report adverse events experienced by the vaccine recipients. After the deaths of 7 girls involved in the trial were reported, a parliamentary investigation concluded that the Gates funded Program For Appropriate Technology and Health Path, which ran the study, had been engaged in a scheme to help ensure healthy markets for GlaxoSmithKline and Merck, The manufacturers of the Gardasil and Cervarix vaccines that had been so generously donated for use in the trial. Had PATH been successful in getting the HPV vaccine seen included in the universal immunization program of the concerned countries.
This would have generated windfall profit for the manufacturers by way of automatic sale Year after year, without any promotional or marketing expenses. It is well known that once introduced into the immunization program, It becomes politically impossible to stop any vaccination. Chandra M. Gulhadi, editor of the influential Monthly Index of Medical Specialties, Remarked that it is shocking to see how an American organization used surreptitious methods to establish itself in India. And Samarin Nundi, Editor Emeritus of the National Medical Journal of India lamented that this is an obvious case where Indians were being used as guinea pigs.
Throughout the decade, India's concerns about the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and its corporate partners' influence on the country's national immunization programs grew. In 2016, the steering group of the country's national health mission blasted the government for allowing the country's national technical advisory group on immunization, The primary body advising the government on all vaccination related matters to be effectively purchased by the Gates Foundation. As one steering group member noted, the NTA GI Secretariat has been moved out of the government's health ministry to the office of Public Health Foundation of India And the 32 staff members in that secretariat draw their salaries from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. There is a clear conflict of interest. On one hand, the BMGF funds the secretariat that is the highest decision making body in vaccines and on the other, it partners with the pharma industry in Gabi.
This is unacceptable. In 2017, the government responded by cutting all financial ties between the advisory group and the Gates Foundation. Similar stories play out across the Gates Foundation's decade of vaccines. There's the Gates founded and funded meningitis vaccine project, Which led to the creation and testing of MenAfrovac, a 50¢ per dose immunization against meningococcal meningitis. The test led to reports of between 45 100 children suffering seizures and convulsions and eventually becoming paralyzed.
There's the 2017 confirmation that the Gates supported oral polio vaccine was actually responsible for the majority of new polio cases, And the 2018 follow-up showing that 80% of polio cases are now vaccine derived. There's the 2018 paper in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health concluding that over 490,000 people in India developed paralysis As a result of the oral polio vaccine between 20,021,017. There's even the WHO's own malaria chief, doctor Arata Kochi, Who complained in an internal memo that Gates's influence meant that the world's leading malaria scientists are now locked up in a cartel with their own research Search funding being linked to those of others within the group, and that the foundation was stifling debate on the best ways to treat and combat malaria, prioritizing only those methods that relied on new technology or developing new drugs. Kochi's complaint, written in 2008, highlights the most common criticism of the global health web that Gates has spun in the past 2 decades, that the public health industry has become a racket run by and for big pharma and its partners for the benefit of big business. At the time that Kochi was writing his memo, the executive director of the Gates Foundation's global health program was Tachi Yamada.
Yamada left his position as chairman of research and development at GlaxoSmithKline to take up the position at the Gates Foundation in 2006, And left the foundation 5 years later to become chief medical and scientific officer at Takeda Pharmaceuticals. Yamada's replacement as head of Gates's global health program, Trevor Mundle was himself a clinical researcher at Pfizer and Parke Davis and spent time as head of development with Novartis before joining the foundation. This use of foundation funds to set public policy to drive up corporate profits is not a secret conspiracy. It is a perfectly open one. When the Center For Global Development formed a working group to develop a practical approach to the vaccine challenge, they concluded that the best way to incentivize pharmaceutical companies produce more vaccines for the 3rd world was for governments to promise to buy vaccines before they were even developed.
They titled their report Making Markets for Vaccines.
Speaker 8: The project Making Markets for Vaccines is really designed to address a problem that's existed for a long time, which is insufficient research and development budgets, as well as investment capacity in vaccine development and production for the 3rd world. How do you create better incentives to get the pharma community, the vaccine community, to produce products that are specifically dedicated for the developing world. Michael Kremer, a professor at Harvard, had been thinking about this a problem for many years.
Speaker 3: He realized that if the rich countries of the world were to make a promise that they would buy a malaria vaccine If somebody produced it, that would give an incentive to the pharmaceutical industry to go and do the research and development needed to make one. But this idea was unfamiliar. No government had made a commitment to buy a product that didn't already exist.
Speaker 2: When the first such advanced market commitment was made in 2007, A $1,500,000,000 promise to buy yet to be produced vaccines from big pharma manufacturers. There was the Gates Foundation as the only non nation sponsor. The Gates Foundation Gavi Vaccine Alliance is an open partnership between the Gates Foundation, the World Health Organization, the World Bank and vaccine manufacturers. Their stated goal includes introducing new vaccines into the routine schedules of national immunization programs And to engage in market shaping efforts to ensure healthy markets for vaccines and other immunization products. If introducing new vaccines and ensuring healthy markets for them was the aim of Gates' decade of vaccines, there can be no doubt That COVID nineteen has seen that goal realized in spectacular fashion.
Speaker 6: Let's start the pledging. The EU kicked off its Fundraising drive with €1,000,000,000. In the hours that followed, pledges were beamed in from across the globe.
Speaker 1: The kingdom of Saudi Arabia has pledged $500,000,000.
Speaker 6: Even pop icon Madonna made a last minute donation of €1,000,000.
Speaker 12: By combining the world's expertise and brainpower and resources. We can attack this disease in the way it's attacking us Globally, our foundation is proud to partner with you. And I'm pleased to announce today that we will pledge $100,000,000 towards this effort.
Speaker 6: Germany was one of the leading donors pledging over €500,000,000. The money is earmarked for international health organizations and research Search networks in a bid to speed up the development of a vaccine.
Speaker 2: And there, At the center of this web is the Gates Foundation, connected to every major organization, research institution, international alliance and vaccine manufacturer involved in the current crisis. Certainly, the Gates, like the Rockefellers, have profited from their years as The most generous people on the planet. As curious as it might seem to those who don't understand the true nature of this monopoly cartel, Despite all of these grants and pledges, commitments of tens of 1,000,000,000 of dollars, Bill Gates personal net worth has actually doubled during this decade of vaccines. From $50,000,000,000 to over $100,000,000,000. But once again, we come back to the question, Who is Bill Gates?
Is he motivated simply by money? Is this incessant drive to vaccinate the entire population of the planet merely the result of greed? Or is there something else driving this agenda? As we shall see next time. Money is not the end goal of Gates' philanthropic activities.
Money is just the tool that he is using to purchase what he really wants. Control. Control not just of the health industry, but control of the human population itself. Next week on the Corbett report.
Speaker 1: So Melinda and I Wondered whether providing new medicines and keeping children alive, would that create more of a population problem?
Speaker 2: Researchers are now developing a a vaccine that is delivered using a dissolvable patch called a microneedle array. In Gates' vision, these digital identities will be tied to all of our actions and transactions.
Speaker 1: Once it's him that gives you infrastructure, the whole way you think about government benefits, This is, to be done differently. And so it's too bad if somebody thinks that creates a privacy problem.
Speaker 2: Bill Gates and the population control grid.
reSee.it AI Summary
Bill Gates' actions in India raised concerns. He allegedly influenced health authorities, using the country as a testing ground for vaccines, benefiting pharma companies he held stock in. These actions should have faced legal consequences and dissolved his foundation.
@iluminatibot - illuminatibot
What Bill Gates did in India should have put him in prison and dissolved his foundation. He captured and took over their health authorities to use the country as a bunch of guinea pigs for the gardasil and polio vaccines, while making those pharma companies his foundation held stock in, billions of dollars.
@_Janey_J - Janey
Bill gates ~ “making money off vaccines is a conspiracy theory”
Video Transcript AI Summary
Billions of dollars have been invested in vaccines, saving millions of lives. However, there is a conspiracy theory that suggests the intention is to profit from vaccines rather than saving lives. The speaker reveals that the return on investment for these vaccinations over the past two decades is an impressive 20 to 1, making it a highly profitable venture. This contradicts the conspiracy theory and highlights the economic benefits of vaccines.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Given billions for vaccines and and save millions of lives, if you just kind of invert that and say, no. We're, you know, trying to make money from vaccines and, not trying to save lives, that's a popular conspiracy theory.
Speaker 1: You've invested $10,000,000,000 in vaccinations over the last 2 decades. And you figured out the return on investment for that. And it kind of stunned me. Can you walk us through the math?
Speaker 0: Over a 20 to 1 return. So if you just looked at the economic benefits. That's a pretty strong number compared to anything else. No, we're trying to make money from vaccines and that's you know, a popular conspiracy theory. Over a 20 to 1 return.
@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes
Before Muammar Gaddafi Was Assassinated He Had A Warning “They will create the virus themselves & pretend to take their time to find the solution when they already have it.” He Planned For A United Africa. Here’s His Untold Story, The One The Media Wouldn’t Tell You
Video Transcript AI Summary
In 1999, the African Union was established with the goal of creating a United States of Africa. Gaddafi contributed $300 million, and other African nations donated $100 million to launch a satellite, enabling direct communication with Africa. Gaddafi also planned to establish an African Development Bank with $70 billion from Libyan oil money, eliminating the need for borrowing from the IMF and World Bank. He intended to set up a Caribbean Development Bank with $1 billion as well. Gaddafi's support for his people included free education from kindergarten to college, free medical attention, and the government covering the cost of medical treatment abroad if needed. Despite these achievements, Gaddafi was killed due to his aspirations for Africa's development.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, I was with. When in 3rd in 1999. Advanced coming out of the Oau to the African union with a vision of the United States of Africa. Listen to me 1,000,000,000 of dollars to create the African union. Did you know that Gaddafi gave $300,000,000 and other African nations gave 100,000,000 to put up a satellite so that we who call Africa don't have to go through to the continent.
Now, we can call directly to Africa and that 500,000,000,000 is in the hand of African people. Did you know that Mohammad Gaddafi was setting up an African development Bank with $70,000,000,000 in the African Development Bank from Libyan Oil money that we would not have to borrow money from the IMF and the World Bank. Is exorbitant rates. 0 interest under Islam non usury teachings. I just left think it.
And in the island of think it, He was gonna set up a Caribbean development bank. He told the prime minister there, and he was gonna put a $1,000,000,000 into bank for Caribbean Development. Why do you think they killed him? You think they killed him because he killed his people Hell no. They killed him because listen to me real good.
You touched one nerve at that point. Did you know that in Libya Listen. Everybody in Libya has either home or an apartment, they call it a flat. Did you know education in Libya is free from kindergarten to college. And did you know that if Olivia wanted to come to America, to be educated, the government in Libya paid for their education.
Did you know that? I was there when he opened a $500,000,000 hospital with 18, theaters for operation I was there and we went when he was making their own medicines. This was a man that gave free medical attention to all the citizens of Libya. And if Libya did not offer that kind of medical attention they could fly anywhere in the world and get it, and the Libyan government would pay for it. Did you know that?
The every Libyan citizen gunner type. Every year, and did you know that that man had no debt everything in his country was paid. Now when you got a man, that did that for an African nation and was trying to do that for all Africa. How do you think Europe felt about
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
When Bush invaded Iraq, he sold an unneeded vaccine to America (Saddam had no smallpox) that ended after too many were injured. It was a prototype for COVID with absurd lines like: "they don’t want their children getting destroyed the way the World Trade Center was destroyed." https://t.co/snw4dSdP0T
Video Transcript AI Summary
The threat of smallpox as a weapon of terror has resurfaced, with evidence suggesting that Soviet scientists who weaponized it during the Cold War may be working elsewhere. Smallpox is highly infectious and can spread through the air, potentially infecting and killing a large number of people. However, there is a lack of vaccine supply in the United States, with only 15 million doses available. Congress aims to produce an additional 200 million doses, but the necessary legislation has not been sent to the president yet. A French company recently discovered over 70 million doses of smallpox vaccine in its freezers. Research shows that the existing vaccine can be diluted and still provide adequate protection, potentially stretching the supply to 150 million doses. The question now is who will receive the vaccine and when, as the consequences of a bioterror attack with smallpox could be devastating, resulting in estimates of 100,000 to 1 million deaths.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Weapons of mass destruction. What the documents published today show is their clear objective to create as much human suffering as possible. Tom Fenton, CBS News, London.
Speaker 1: It has been more than 20 years since smallpox was declared eradicated worldwide And even longer since Americans stopped being vaccinated. Now the threat of smallpox is back as a weapon of terror. But Jim Stewart tells us Americans have little protection against it.
Speaker 0: The only remaining stocks of smallpox are supposed to be locked away in research labs at the Centers For Disease Control in Atlanta And similar ones in Russia. But with evidence that Soviet scientists who successfully weaponized it during the Cold War may now be working elsewhere, Smallpox gets top billing for a threat capable of killing 1,000.
Speaker 2: You know, I lose my sleep on smallpox. I think that's the worst because it's infectious. Our society is very, very mobile. All you're gonna need is a few handful of cases.
Speaker 0: The smallpox virus spreads through the air from person to person, And so the very 1st smallpox victim to walk into a hospital could potentially infect every person there. Unvaccinated, an estimated third of them would die.
Speaker 3: I want to see the vaccination made available. I want to see it made available soon, and I want my children to get it.
Speaker 0: After September 11th, Marsha Jordan Burke asked her pediatrician to vaccinate her children against smallpox.
Speaker 3: Their sense of urgency Is they don't want their children destroyed like the World Trade Center was destroyed. Take some big breaths, Christian.
Speaker 0: But doctor Barnett had to tell her and many other parents since That there is no vaccine. The reason is a lack of supply. The United States has 15,000,000 doses of old vaccine seen on reserve in case of an emergency, and congress wants to produce another 200,000,000 new doses, but the anti terrorism legislation that would pay for all that has yet to be sent to the president.
Speaker 3: I think maybe they're stalling for time until they have more vaccine and they figure out what to do. I think a voluntary small Vaccination program is inevitable.
Speaker 0: But even after manufacturing begins, getting the new vaccine will take at least a year. For some anxious parents and doctors, that's simply not soon enough. Jim Stewart, CBS News, Washington.
Speaker 4: The deadly smallpox virus thought to be obsolete, but now there is Growing anxiety about a possible new bioterror attack of some sort, which is why it was such big news that a French company Has just revealed an astonishing find more than 70,000,000 doses of smallpox vaccine long forgotten in its freezers. Also tonight, new research that the shows the small amount of vaccine available in the US may be available to protect many more people than originally thought. NBC News chief science correspondent, Robert Bazell, tonight on the growing debate over the best way to protect Americans from this awful disease.
Speaker 5: The studies out today on hundreds of volunteers prove the existing vaccine can be diluted extensively and still provide adequate protection.
Speaker 6: The supply of vaccine can be stretched considerably at least 1 to 5 and perhaps 1 to 10 times to give us perhaps as many as a 150,000,000 doses.
Speaker 5: And hundreds of millions of fresh doses will be ready by the end of the year. So now the questions are, who gets the vaccine and when?
Speaker 6: If in fact there is a bio terrorism attack with smallpox, The potential consequences could be devastating.
Speaker 5: Expert estimates range from 100,000 to a 1000000 deaths.
reSee.it AI Summary
In a 2008 speech at the WEF, Bill Gates discussed his goal of reducing mortality rates in developing countries by addressing common diseases. However, some individuals claim that his vaccination efforts are a disguise for depopulation. For more information, refer to the provided sources: a YouTube video and the website for daily email updates.
@wideawake_media - Wide Awake Media
Speaking at the WEF in 2008, Bill Gates tells Klaus Schwab about his mission to depopulate the third world, by "reducing the mortality rates of common diseases". Translation: I will reduce the population of developing countries by sterilising everybody with my "vaccines", under the guise of reducing the mortality rate of common diseases. Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=Ql-Mtlx31e8 Subscribe to us on Telegram: https://t.me/realwideawakemedia Subscribe to our newsletter, for daily email updates: https://www.wide-awake-media.com
Video Transcript AI Summary
In 10 to 15 years, I hope to leave a legacy of significant impact in my new role. My ambitious goal is to make a dramatic difference in at least half of the 20 diseases our global health program focuses on. By doing so, we can greatly reduce mortality rates in developing countries, leading to a decline in population growth. This, in turn, will make education and nutrition more accessible. I have high expectations for the positive changes we can achieve.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What would you like to see as your legacy in 10, 15 years? Of the new work? Of the new work. Yeah. Of your new function.
Well, I've set very ambitious goals because I'm quite optimistic. If you look at, say, the 20 diseases that our global health program goes after, I'd hope that within 15 years, over half of those, We could have had a very dramatic impact. Huge change in the mortality rates in developing countries, Which then has this effect of reducing population growth. That's the this big benefit that then makes everything like Education and nutrition, a lot easier. So I have very high expectations
(The Real) Wide Awake Media
My original channel was hacked and taken over by a scammer. He's now stealing my content (look at the timestamps). This is now the official Wide Awake Media channel. Please spread the word!
t.me
Wide Awake Media - News and commentary on the long-term agenda for global control that's unfolding before our eyes.
News and commentary on the long-term agenda for global control that's unfolding before our eyes.
wide-awake-media.com
@bamajayt - Bama_Jeans
Alex Jones in 2009.. Who knew he WASN'T crazy? He was right. Vaccines and viruses used as bioweapons? In 2009 we were chuckling.. Not so much now.. https://t.co/vPtcSn2tZk
Video Transcript AI Summary
There is a global agenda to enforce vaccines and establish a medical tyranny under the UN and World Health Organization. The Bilderberg group is behind this, aiming for a planetary dictatorship and forced depopulation through the medical system. Vaccines are crucial to their plan, despite the serious adverse reactions they can cause. Dr. Rima Lable, an insider, is concerned about the police state developments and the impending compulsory vaccination disguised as voluntary pre-vaccination. The World Health Organization has been working on vaccines to create permanent sterility, and illegal FDA-approved vaccines contain squalene, which can induce a pandemic. The government will then use this pandemic as justification.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There's an entire agenda afoot to force the population to undergo different type of medical treatments, namely vaccines. We're seeing a medical tyranny being set up, not just in the United States, but worldwide under the UN and the World Health organization. Who's behind all this? The Bilderberg group. They want a planetary dictatorship so they can carry out their forced depopulation agenda, and they Wanna do it through the medical system, and that's why vaccines are so important.
We know that many of these vaccines turn out to have serious adverse reactions. This is being done by design. They kill you slowly over time. That's why they're called soft kill. And I've got an insider I think you should really talk to, Doctor Rima Lable.
She doesn't live inside the United States because she's so concerned about all the police state developments. Wanna come and sit down?
Speaker 1: No, sir. I'd rather not.
Speaker 2: You'd rather Just be here so you can make a fast exit if you have
Speaker 1: As soon as you and I finish
Speaker 2: You're out there.
Speaker 1: Leaving the country again. Why? Because in a very short time, not today, Not tomorrow, but very soon, we'll be facing compulsory vaccination under the mistaken term of voluntary pre vaccination.
Speaker 2: What is it about these vaccinations? You think that they're bad?
Speaker 1: Well, first of all, let's start with the fact that the World Health Organization has decided that we have 90% too many people. The World Health Organization has been working since 19 74 on vaccines to create permanent sterility.
Speaker 2: Doctor, the response is gonna be, you're crazy. How can you say this stuff?
Speaker 1: I show them The documentation.
Speaker 2: Now this is pretty shocking.
Speaker 1: This process has already been ongoing. To make matters worse, We know that the vaccines that were illegally approved by the FDA contain a substance It's called squalene. They will induce a pandemic using the nasal mist vaccine, Which is a live attenuated virus. That means that if I take it, I can infect you. You're going to get the flu.
Everybody around us is going get the flu, then the United States government, based on their statements that they've already made, will say, oh my. We have a pandemic.
@ShadowofEzra - Shadow of Ezra
In 2009, at the United Nations, Muammar Gadaffi spoke about large companies creating viruses in order to sell vaccines. He was killed shortly after. https://t.co/cNKqWdpfZ8
Video Transcript AI Summary
Today, the speaker criticizes the commercialization of vaccines and medicines. They argue that capitalist companies produce viruses and vaccines for profit, which they find unethical. The speaker believes that vaccines and medicines should be provided free of charge, especially to children, and that the world should prioritize the well-being of people over making money. They emphasize the need for global efforts to manufacture and distribute vaccines without seeking profit. The speaker suggests that the responsibility lies with the general assembly to address these issues.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Today, there is swine flu. Perhaps tomorrow, there'll be fish flu. Because sometimes we produce viruses by controlling them. It is a commercial business. Capitalist companies produce viruses so, that they can generate and sell vaccinations.
This is a very shameful and poor ethics. Vaccinations and medicines should not be sold. In the green book, I maintain that medicines Should not be sold or subject to commercialization. Medicines should be free of charge and Nation's given free to children. But capitalist companies produce the viruses and vaccinations and want to make a profit.
Why are they not free of charge? We should give them free of charge, not sell them. The entire world should strive to protect our people, create and manufacture vaccinations, and then give them for free to children women are not profit by them. All those items are on the agenda of the general assembly, which has to exercise that duty.
reSee.it AI Summary
Muammar Gaddafi believes that intelligence agencies are creating viruses for profit. He suggests that making vaccines free could prevent the spread of viruses. He also mentions the consequences faced by those who speak the truth. Gaddafi references Saddam Hussein and himself as examples of leaders who were killed for standing up against the deep state. He criticizes the military-industrial complex for the state of Iraq and Libya.
@bambkb - Kevin - WE THE PEOPLE❤️ - DAD🦁 🐉 🔥
🚨🚨🚨 Former president of Libya 🇱🇾 Muammar Gaddafi : “I believe that there will be many viruses in the future - Many companies are working hard to CREATE them, especially INTELLIGENCE agencies”😳😳 “It’s obvious that it’s a business, because #Vaccines are expensive” “They create a virus, spread it around the world, then make MASSIVE PROFITS!!!” The working class almost lost $4 TRILLION dollars, while ‘the super RICH’ created 500 new billionaires and gained almost $ 4 Trillion dollars in wealth during #COVID - What a coincidence, right guys!?🙄 “If they make #Vaccines FREE for humanity, I bet that you will see MOST viruses STOP appearing and spreading”😆 You notice that he keeps saying “if you make #Vaccines free, viruses will disappear” - My interpretation : If there is NO profit to be made by these parasites, no virus will probably appear again - I completely agree Do you realize a trend here? If you speak too much TRUTH, you end up dying for whatever reason the media invents and propagandizes to the public🤔🤷♂️ Saddam Hussein, Muammar Gaddafi and many others were killed for simply standing up and speaking out against #TheDeepState - it’s an absolute joke to think that these countries are better off after they got bombed into oblivion by the #MilitaryIndustrialComplex - Iraq 🇮🇶 lives in extreme poverty now and so does 🇱🇾 Libya #NWO #DeepState #Gaddafi
Video Transcript AI Summary
Uzaktayım ve zaten beş kişi arasındayım. Elimde bir biber var ve onu yakaladım. Kitabımı bırakmamam gerekiyor. Yakın değiller, bu yüzden birbirlerine rezervasyon yapmaları gerekiyor.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Uzakt. Zaten. Beşin arasuyor. Bir biber var. Ben yakaladım.
Benu kitab bırakmaım. Yakın bir değillerler. Haniler rezervlen bir birbiri ne koyyabil.
@liz_churchill10 - Liz Churchill
Did anyone find out why Bill Gates was presenting a vaccine for ‘Religious Fundamentalists’ to the Pentagon in 2005? Is Satanic Bill Gates CIA? https://t.co/r7AoBjyIYB
Video Transcript AI Summary
Individuals with high levels of the BMAT 2 gene are religious fanatics, while those with low levels are not. Vaccinating against this gene could potentially eliminate extremist behavior. Brain scans show religious fanatics have increased activity in the theory of mind region, while non-religious individuals show disgust. The proposed project, Fund Vax, aims to develop a vaccine to combat religious fundamentalism using respiratory viruses like flu. The data supports the project's potential success.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We have individuals who are religious fun fundamentalist religious fanatics, and this is the expression, RT PCR, real time PCR, expression of the BMAT 2 gene. Over here, we have individuals. So so so let let me complete. So over here, we have, individuals who are not particularly, fundamentalists, not particularly religious. And you can see there's a much reduced expression of of this particular gene, the the BMAT 2, gene.
Another evidence that that supports our our hypothesis approach. What you what you see
Speaker 1: here is by by by spreading this virus, we're gonna eliminate individuals from donning on a bomb vest and going into a market and blowing up the market.
Speaker 0: So our our hypothesis is that these are fanatical people, that they have overexpression of the BMAT 2 gene, and that by vaccinating them against this, we'll eliminate this behavior. So we have some some very, very, remarkable data in this next slide. Here we have 2, brain scans, these are fMRIs. These are 2 different individuals with different levels of expression of VMAT2. On top, is an individual who's a religious fanatic and individual, and we've repeated this numerous times, that that has high levels of VMAT 2.
Now, this individual down here who had low levels of the VMAT 2 gene, this individual would, self describe as as as not particularly religious. In in each case, these individuals were, were read a religious text. This individual, light lit up, the right middle frontal gyrus, shown here. And that's a part of the brain that's associated with theory of mind. It's a part of the brain that, has to do with intents and beliefs and desires.
In contrast, in marked contrast, here's an individual who would, not particularly, self describe as, as religious. And when they're read a religious text, what you see is that this part of the brain called the anterior insula lights up. This is a part of the brain that's associated with with disgust or displeasure on hearing something.
Speaker 1: So you're suggesting I take a CT scan with me when I'm, evaluating people to determine whether I put a bullet in their head?
Speaker 0: So so, the the data that I'm presenting here, supports, the the concept that that we're proposing. And I think that, we would not propose to do CT scans or fMRIs on on individuals out in the hinterlands of of Afghanistan. The virus would immunize against this VMAT 2 gene, and that would would have the effect that you see here, which is it's essentially to turn a fanatic into a a a normal person. And we think that will have major effects in the Middle East.
Speaker 1: How would you suggest that this is gonna be dispersed? The aerosol?
Speaker 0: Well, so so the the present plan and the tests that we've done so far, have used, respiratory viruses, such as flu or or, rhinoviruses. And, we believe that that's a satisfactory way to get the exposure of the largest, part of the population. Most of us, of course, have had been exposed to both of those viruses. And and we're we're quite confident that that this will be a a very successful, approach.
Speaker 1: This is fascinating. What's the name of this proposal?
Speaker 0: Yeah. So so the name of this project is Fund Vax, which is the vaccine for religious fundamentalism.
Speaker 1: And you have a proposal already?
Speaker 0: The proposal, has just been submitted, and I think that the data that I have shown you today would would support, the the development of of this project, and we think it has great promise.
@bambkb - Kevin - WE THE PEOPLE❤️ - DAD🦁 🐉 🔥
🚨🚨🚨 “Depopulation through FORCED vaccination : The Zero Carbon Solution” This was written in 2011 and proposed by the saviour of humanity himself, Bill Gates😳 Can anyone connect the dots yet? https://t.co/y4bPlwO4Hz
Video Transcript AI Summary
In 2011, Gates suggested compulsory vaccination as an environmentally friendly solution. A meeting in 2009 called the Good Club involved Warren Buffett, Oprah Winfrey, George Soros, and Bill Gates discussing depopulation, vaccines, and pandemics. The meeting took place at David Rockefeller's house. The speakers connect the dots across decades, hinting at a possible conspiracy.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Through compulsory vaccination. Gates thinks at the time, 2011, it would be the most, quote, environmentally friendly solution. Hats off to this woman who kept it. Uh-huh. Your thoughts?
Speaker 1: This is this has been he they've told us this again and again. He's out in the open saying this. You know, his father was, the president of Planned Parenthood. Mhmm. I mean, there's so many things that's so twisted.
If you go back to 2,009, there was a meeting called the Good Club.
Speaker 0: Mhmm.
Speaker 1: And it was Warren Buffett and Oprah Winfrey and George Soros and Bill Gates, and they all got together behind closed doors to talk about what? Depopulation, vaccines, pandemics, all of the things that we saw unfold. What a huge coincidence that was.
Speaker 0: Very interesting. That one might call it a conspiracy theory, at one time, and maybe it turned out to not be a conspiracy.
Speaker 1: Where they met?
Speaker 0: Davos or
Speaker 1: No. Actually, at David Rockefeller's house.
Speaker 0: Oh, there we go. Wow. That's even better.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah. He had a a little a cottage there for them to need it.
Speaker 0: Quick thought, Terrence, and we'll bring in Orin Adritz next. No. Just dots being connected even across decades. That's crazy. Incredible.
Sounds like a rabbit hole in
@RedpillDrifter - Redpill Drifter
Bill Gates and Klaus Schwab in 2008 discussing how great it will be when disease reduces the population. But stop being a conspiracy theorist. https://t.co/vBkwt6py7H
Video Transcript AI Summary
In 10-15 years, I hope to see a significant impact on global health, particularly in reducing mortality rates in developing countries. We aim for improvements in diseases like malaria, with the ultimate goal of easing challenges in education and nutrition. Our foundation uses data-driven dashboards to track progress and share learnings with others. With a budget of $3 billion annually, we have high expectations for the impact we can make. Thank you for the opportunity to discuss our work at the World Economic Forum.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What what would you like to see as your legacy in 10, 15 years?
Speaker 1: Of the new work?
Speaker 0: Of the new work. Yes. It's a new function.
Speaker 1: Well, I set very ambitious goals because I'm quite optimistic. If you look at say the 20 diseases that our global health program goes after, I hope that within 15 years, over half of those, we could have had a very dramatic impact. Some of them will prove to be harder than others, for example, AIDS, we will have made an improvement, but not the dramatic improvement probably in that timeframe. Malaria perhaps and a number of the other ones, we have things in the pipeline. So huge change in the mortality rates in developing countries, which then has this effect of reducing population growth.
That's the this big benefit that then makes everything like education and nutrition a lot easier. So I have very high expectations there. And we actually use these dashboards internally at the foundation to make everything be quite numeric. We're trying to be rigorous about that and even share those so that people can see, oh, you fell short of what you had in mind and then we get to explain if we have any lessons that might be learnable from other foundations. So I think there's some things about how we go about things that I hope those learnings can have an impact.
There is the specific work in the different divisions, health, development and U. S. Education work, but in 15 years, boy, we by then, we will have spent a lot of money, 3,000,000,000 a year, 15 years, that adds up. And for that, people should have a very high expectation of what we can do.
Speaker 0: Thank you, Bill, for having brought, to us this evening. A very enlightened,
Speaker 1: very
Speaker 0: a very enlightened view of, capitalism. I hope many will follow you. We will facilitate it in any case because that's the mission of the World Economic Forum. And I'm looking forward to, if I may say so, to welcome you back in your new incarnation next year. Thank you.
Speaker 1: Thank you.
@DiedSuddenly_ - DiedSuddenly
Remember the swine flu and the marketing surrounding it? Remember when they quickly rolled out a vaccine, but backtracked after people started getting injured by it? When the facts came out about the Swine Flu injection propaganda, the people will riot. https://t.co/hV94z2aGxR
Video Transcript AI Summary
The video discusses the controversy surrounding the swine flu vaccine campaign. Important figures like President Ford and Elton John took the shot, but some, like Mary, did not give permission to use their names. Mary was leery of the vaccine due to potential side effects. Despite concerns, the government did not release all the facts. Judy Roberts and others are still awaiting their day in court.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If swine flu wants to challenge me, I'm ready. Oh, me too, brother. Me too. Get the swine flu shot. Time is running out.
Read to you from one of your own agencies. Memos planning the campaign to urge Americans to take the shot. The swine flu vaccine has been taken by many important persons. Example, president Ford, Henry Kissinger, Elton John, Muhammad Ali, Mary, Rudolph Noref, Walter Cronkite, Ralph Nader, Edward Kennedy, etcetera, etcetera. Did you talk to these people beforehand to find out if they plan to take the show?
Not know. Did anybody? I do not know. Did you get permission to use their names in your campaign? I do not know.
Mary, did you take a swan flu shot?
Speaker 1: No. I did not.
Speaker 0: Did you give them permission to use your name saying that you had or were going to?
Speaker 1: Absolutely not. Never did.
Speaker 0: Did you ask your own doctor about taking the swine flu
Speaker 1: shot? Yes. And at the time, he thought it might be a good idea. But I resisted it because I was leery of having the symptoms that sometimes go with that kind of inoculation. A man with my government because they knew the facts, but they didn't release those facts because they if they had released them, the people wouldn't have taken.
And they can come out tomorrow and tell me there's gonna be an epidemic, and they can drop off like flies to me, I will not take another shot that my government tells me to take.
Speaker 0: Meantime, Judy Roberts and some 4,000 others like her are still waiting for their day in court.
reSee.it AI Summary
Moderna CEO, Stéphane Bancel, admitted that they produced 100,000 COVID-19 vaccine doses in 2019, with a statement predicting the need for 1 billion doses the following year. Questions arise regarding how this information was known while being missed by others, leading some to call for accountability.
@DiedSuddenly_ - DiedSuddenly
How did they know, and how did we miss this? The CEO of Moderna, Stéphane Bancel, confessed that their company manufactured 100,000 doses of COVID-19 vaccine in 2019. In 2019 he stated: “Next year we’re going to need to make 1 billion doses. There’s going to be a pandemic.” Some people need to start going to jail.
Video Transcript AI Summary
In 2022, the speaker discusses the rapid development and scaling of vaccines for different COVID-19 variants. They highlight the increase in manufacturing capacity compared to 2020, with a personal anecdote about predicting the need to produce a billion doses due to the pandemic.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It happened obviously with COVID-nineteen starting from 2022 and how extraordinary the process was also in terms of the speed. How is development adoption and scaling of vaccine going on when it comes for different variants and sub variants? Because this is one of the big concerns as we as we're all here now and we're discussing when we understand the context and this is a great deal.
Speaker 1: Sure. Good morning and thank you for having me on the panel. So the great news versus 2020, where we are today is we have manufacturing capacity. As Seth knows, when the pandemic happened, Molina had made 100,000 doors in 2019 for the whole year. And I remember walking after that I was into the office of my head of manufacturing and I say, how will we make $1,000,000,000 next year?
And you look at me a bit funny, say, what? I say, yeah, we need to make $1,000,000,000 next year. There's going to be a pandemic.
Speaker 0: And I'm going
@liz_churchill10 - Liz Churchill
Everyone thought he was delusional. Look what’s happening now. “I believe there will be many viruses in the future…companies are working hard to create them…especially private Intelligence Agencies. How is this possible…”? -Libya’s Muammar Gaddafi 1942-2011 https://t.co/oF7DHKWvXw
@toobaffled - “Sudden And Unexpected”
Africans received 50 million smallpox vaccines tainted with AIDS from the W.H.O. “The amount of wickedness that exists among us is unfathomable.” The London Times headlined a worldwide story on May 11, 1987. https://t.co/lS4aMZHug2
@JamesMelville - James Melville 🚜
2010: Channel 4 News: Swine Flu: “One of the greatest medical scandals of the century….The Council of Europe’s health chief has accused major pharmaceutical firms of organising a campaign of panic and unduly influencing World Health Organisation decisions.” https://t.co/NIpjbsw8xJ
Video Transcript AI Summary
A Council of Europe health chief accused major pharmaceutical firms of organizing a panic campaign and unduly influencing World Health Organization (WHO) decisions regarding swine flu. European countries are burdened with bills for millions of unwanted vaccine doses, prompting calls for an investigation.
The predictions for the impact of swine flu included 64,000 deaths, tens of thousands hospitalized, and a country crippled by the virus. The government spent hundreds of millions of pounds on antiviral drugs and vaccines. However, 10 months into the pandemic, only 355 Britons died, and globally, the virus hasn't lived up to fears. Politicians in Brussels are requesting an investigation into the role pharmaceutical companies played in influencing political decisions that led to a swine flu spending spree. The Council of Europe Committee wants the investigation to focus on the WHO's decision to lower the threshold required for a pandemic declaration and probe ties between key WHO advisors and drug companies. Some suspect the danger was vastly exaggerated by pharmaceutical companies to make money.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Greatest medical scandals of the century according to a leading health expert in Brussels. The Council of Europe Health's chief has accused major pharmaceutical firms of organizing a campaign of panic and unduly influencing World Health Organization decisions. And with European countries now burdened with bills for millions of unwanted doses of the swine flu vaccine, he wants an investigation. Our science correspondent, Tom Clark, has this report.
Speaker 1: Flu viruses can spread 64,000 people dead, tens of 1,000 hospitalized, a country crippled by a virus. The predictions for the impact of swine flu on Britain were grim. The government's response, spending 100 of 1,000,000 of pounds on antiviral drugs and vaccines, adverts, and leaflets. But 10 months into the pandemic, only 355 Britons have died. And, globally, the virus hasn't lived up to our fears.
Were governments misled into preparing for the worst? Politicians in Brussels are now asking for an investigation into the role pharmaceutical companies played in influencing political decisions that led to a swine flu spending spree.
Speaker 2: There must be a process to to get more transparency how the in the WHO have a function and who is influencing the decisions of the WHO and what is the role of the pharmaceutical industry there. I'm very suspicious about the processes which are behind this, pandemic.
Speaker 1: The Council of Europe Committee want the investigation to focus on the World Health Organization's decision to lower the threshold required for a pandemic to be formally declared.
Speaker 0: The world is now at the start of the 2009 influenza pandemic.
Speaker 1: When this happened in June last year, governments had to activate huge pre prepared contracts for drugs and vaccines with manufacturers. They also want to probe ties between key WHO advisors and drug companies.
Speaker 3: Who is deciding what the risk is? Is it the pharmaceutical companies who want to sell drugs? Or is it someone making a decision based on the perceived danger? In this case, it appears that the danger was vastly exaggerated. And was it exaggerated by the pharmaceutical companies in order to make money?
Speaker 1: Our government, like many others, is now paying the price for being prepared. Citing commercial confidential
@iluminatibot - illuminatibot
Bill Gates and Klaus Schwab in 2008 discussing how great it will be when disease reduces the population. https://t.co/MICiL3nJ0D
Video Transcript AI Summary
人在里面的时候我们就是一个人的时候我们。
When people are inside, we are alone.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: 的 人 在 这 里 面 的 时 候 我 们 的 时 候 我 们 的 时 候 我 们 的 时 候 我 们 的 时 候 我 们 的 时 候 我 们 就 是 一 个 人 的 时 候 我 们
@KennedyForTheW - KennedyForTheW
2005: Jon Stewart interviews RFK about vaccines before Pharma bought up the airwaves https://t.co/TmdoHKFj1y
Video Transcript AI Summary
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. discusses the controversial link between autism and childhood vaccinations, particularly focusing on thimerosal, a mercury-based preservative used in vaccines from 1989 to 2003. He highlights a significant rise in neurological disorders during that period, with autism rates increasing from 1 in 2,500 children in 1988 to 1 in 166 today. Although thimerosal has been removed from most vaccines in the U.S., it remains in some, including the flu vaccine, and autism rates are rising in countries like China, where vaccinations began in 1999. Kennedy expresses concerns about the pharmaceutical industry's fear of litigation and the reluctance of federal agencies to admit potential harm caused by their decisions. He recounts an experience with ABC News, where a story on this topic was initially canceled but later aired with a pro-pharmaceutical slant, raising questions about media influence and transparency.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Link between autism and childhood vaccinations, please welcome Robert f Kennedy Junior to the program. Robert?
Speaker 1: Nice to see you. Likewise.
Speaker 0: As we adjust our chairs. Normally known more for environmental causes, and I guess to a certain extent, this is, apropos of that. Most recently, you're talking about the link between autism and vaccinations. Pretty controversial.
Speaker 1: What what what It's not all vaccinations, but between, 1989 and 2003, almost all of our vaccinations included a material called called thimerosal, which breaks down to form mercury. It was a preservative. It was unnecessary to add the vaccines. And we saw during that period a dramatic increase in neurological disorders among American children. Today, 1 in every 6 American children has some born during that period has some kind of, neurological disorders, speech delay, language delay, dyslexia, and at the opposite end of the range, autism.
Autism rates at in 1988 before they started adding all these vaccines, 1 in every 25 100 children had autism. Today, 1 in every 166 children have autism. And there is very, very strong science, really overwhelming science, linking those autism rates to the thimerosal that was in the vaccines. The thimerosal, people should know, has been removed from most of the vaccines in America. We still have it in the flu vaccine and in 1 or 2 other, but we are still giving it to children all over the world.
And there's now been a dramatic increase in the 3rd world in autism rates. A few years ago, 6 years ago, autism was unknown in China. Today, we started giving them our vaccines in 1999. Today, there's 1,800,000 cases of autism in China. And there's there the the science today, if you actually read the science, which most journalists don't do, the science is, is overwhelming that there is a link between the autism and the thimerosal.
Speaker 0: So where then, you know, is the controversy? Because there are certain there are certain issues that, if true, if validated, do boggle your mind with a sense of humanity. If these vaccine makers or if the FDA or other people are allowing a certain compound into these vaccinations that's causing autism and they now know it, Why are they fighting so hard, to keep that? Is it is it purely to save their asses, or is it are they concerned about people then rejecting vaccines in general and then the public health suffers? I mean, clearly, a lot of these people are not benevolent.
Speaker 1: There appear to be 2 two concerns. One is the, the pharmaceutical industry is terror terrified of the litigation. This is literally 1,000,000,000,000 of dollars of damage for each autistic kid. The if you have a kid with autism in your family, it shatters your family. So that's a concern with the pharmaceutical industry.
There's also a concern with the scientists at CDC and the FDA, the federal agencies that green lighted autism. And as congressman Weldon, who's a right wing Republican congressman who's also invested in this issue and is convinced that there's a link, what he says is that, you know, how many people how many of us would want to admit that a decision we made had poisoned a whole generation of American children? The, but, you know, the principle kind of benevolent, rationale is that, these, the the federal agencies and the pharmaceutical companies wanna make sure that people don't get scared off of vaccines. What I've been saying is people are gonna be frightened about vaccines if they don't trust the federal regulators, to be honest with the American people. And the biggest threat to our vaccine program is that these people have now been caught red handed conspiring to hide this information from the American people.
We've tried you've tried to
Speaker 0: talk about this publicly, and there's a real interesting story about what happened, to you with with ABC News, where they had shot a story for you concerning the link.
Speaker 1: I had I had pieces coming out, the cover story of salon.com, and Rolling Stone simultaneously, printed published the same piece. We had an exclusive deal with ABC to air the piece, to air a story about the piece. ABC on ABC Nightly News and Good Morning America. ABC told us, they had read the piece, we gave them an exclusive, so we didn't pitch it to the other networks. They told us that they believed in the story, that they were behind it.
They wanted to be the network to expose this to the American people. The night before the piece aired, I received a call from the producer saying ABC has canceled the piece. The order came from higher ups at the, network. They won't explain why they're doing it. 2 days later, ABC was deluge deluged with, with letters from the autism community, mainly mothers who have autistic kids, but hundreds and hundreds of emails.
This is what the producer told me. And he said, we are no longer gonna cancel it. We're now, going to air it. Booking a rec we're gonna recut it. They recut the show, but they recut it to make it virtually an advertisement for the pharmaceutical industry.
And indeed, you know, as if to emphasize the capitulation to big pharma, they bracketed the segment that they did on flimerosal with 2 ads for pharmaceutical, you know, products, you know. I mean, I have no idea what happened at ABC, and I can't, you know, look into their heads and see what happened. But, that series of events was, suspicious.
Speaker 0: And if if nothing else, it does seem that, it's very hard to argue the idea that putting mercury in things some people would argue, I guess, that we're surrounded by all sorts of mercury contaminants and everything, and the vaccines aren't as much. But, with with so many passionate people on the case of it, it it would seem that there must be something there. Smoke, there's fire.
Speaker 1: Yeah. The you know, I I got into this serendipitously. It's not really my area. I've been working on environmental, mercury for many years from power plants. In 19 states, it's now unsafe to eat any freshwater fish because of mercury that's coming from our power plants.
I eat only
Speaker 0: tropical fish. That's my,
Speaker 1: fish.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Well, it's it's it's, a remarkable story. I wish we had more time, but, I appreciate you getting the word out. And I know, parents of kids with autism truly appreciate it. And I know that it's a very difficult thing, thing for them to be dealing with, so I'm sure they appreciate the help and support.
For having
Speaker 1: And the show My pleasure.
@elizatino - ElizaTino
@liz_churchill10 Here's what Gaddafi had to say about vaccines. I kind of remember this speech, but it didn't have any impact on me until I saw it again after Covid. I know there were several reasons why he was taken out and I wonder if things like this were one of them. https://t.co/Qt1NeUVWEN
@redpilldispensr - Red Pill Dispenser
Dr. Rima Laibow, 2009: "Very soon, we'll be facing compulsory vaccination." "The World Health Organization has decided that we have 90% too many people." "The World Health Organization has been working since 1974 on vaccines to create permanent sterility." https://t.co/3v6pOWAoA2
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker is leaving the country due to impending compulsory vaccination, which they call a mistaken term of voluntary vaccination. They claim the World Health Organization believes there are too many people and has been working since 1974 on vaccines to create permanent sterility.
The speaker alleges that vaccines illegally approved by the FDA contain squalene. Injecting squalene causes the immune system to attack it, then attack the body, resulting in Gulf War syndrome-like symptoms.
The speaker fled the United States fearing the Bilderberg's plan to use vaccines to kill much of the world's population. They claim a pandemic will be induced using a nasal mist vaccine, a live attenuated virus, which will cause the flu to spread.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: As soon as you and I finish
Speaker 1: You're on.
Speaker 0: I'm leaving the country again. Why? Because in a very short time, not today, not tomorrow, but very soon, we'll be facing compulsory vaccination under the mistaken term of voluntary vaccination.
Speaker 1: Now what is it about these vaccinations? You think that they're bad?
Speaker 0: Well, first of all, let's start with the fact that the World Health Organization has decided that we have ninety percent too many people. The World Health Organization has been working since 1974 on vaccines to create permanent sterility.
Speaker 1: Doctor, the response is gonna be, you're crazy. How can you save this stuff?
Speaker 0: I show them the documentation.
Speaker 1: Now this is pretty shocking.
Speaker 0: This process has already been ongoing. To make matters worse, we know that the vaccines that were illegally approved by the FDA contain a substance called squalene.
Speaker 1: Squalene, an organic compound used in vaccines to stimulate the immune system and increase the response.
Speaker 0: If I inject you with squalene, your immune system will attack the squalene, but then it starts attacking all of the parts of your body. What does that look like when you meet a person to whom that is happening? It looks like Gulf War syndrome. It looks like every joint in the body swollen and intolerably painful and immobilized.
Speaker 1: This is in these shots they're gonna give us?
Speaker 0: It's in some of them, but the US government has to prick up their sleeve.
Speaker 1: Which is? Kissy Ventura's investigation into the secret society that runs the world has led to this, a meeting on a remote airstrip with doctor Rima Labo. The physician fled The United States in fear of the Bilderberg's plan to use vaccines to kill off much of the world's population.
Speaker 0: They will induce a pandemic using the nasal mist vaccine, which is a live attenuated virus. That means that if I take it, I can infect you. You're going to get the flu. Everybody around us is going to get the flu. Then the United States government, based on their state
reSee.it AI Summary
I learned that the Spanish Flu was allegedly caused by a vaccine. Frederick Lamont Gates injected the U.S. army with an experimental bacterial meningitis vaccine at Fort Riley, which he did for the Rockefeller Foundation. This vaccine experiment supposedly went horribly wrong and spread disease globally during the war.
@toobaffled - “Sudden And Unexpected”
Did you know that, ‘the Spanish Flu’ was caused by a Vaccine ? Frederick Lamont Gates injected the USA army on behalf of ‘the Rockefeller Foundation’ at Fort Riley. They were injected with an experimental ‘bacterial meningitis’ Vaccine derived from horses. 🐴 “The so called, ‘Spanish flu’ was a Vaccine experiment that went HORRIBLY wrong!!” The army then went to WAR and spread disease around the world!
Video Transcript AI Summary
The Spanish Flu did not originate in Spain, nor was it a flu. It was a bacteria that caused lethal pneumonia.
In 1918, an experimental bacterial meningitis vaccine cultured in horses by the Rockefeller Institute was injected into soldiers at Fort Riley. The Spanish Flu was a vaccine experiment gone wrong. 2,000,000 soldiers went overseas and spread the bacteria. The American population was then vaccinated as well.
The Rockefeller Institute was in charge of the distribution and mass vaccination program, and Doctor Frederick Gates was the main scientist in charge. Survivors became "cloud adults," spreading the bacteria to others.
Similarities exist between the Spanish Flu and COVID-19: Frederick Gates then, Bill Gates now; Rockefeller initiative then and now; disease developed in Fort Riley then, Wuhan now; closed down societies then and now; "cloud adults" then, shedding now.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Died. One third of the entire world population was infected. There are several very interesting things about the Spanish flu. First of all, it didn't start in Spain. Secondly, it wasn't a flu.
There's more, but let's start with these two, shall we? If it didn't start in Spain, then where did it? In The US. If it wasn't a flu virus, what was it? It was a bacteria that caused severe and, in most cases, lethal pneumonia.
Long story short, during the first half of nineteen eighteen, an experimental bacterial meningitis vaccine cultured in horses by the Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research in New Rockefeller University, was injected into soldiers at Fort Riley. The so called Spanish flu was a vaccine experiment gone horribly wrong. 2,000,000 of them went overseas. They forged under poor sanitary conditions, so the bacteria spread like wildfire wherever they went. The story was then spread that these soldiers would come home with all sorts of European diseases so the American population was vaccinated as well.
Who was in charge of that distribution and mass vaccination program? The Rockefeller Institute. Who was the main scientist in charge? Doctor Frederick Gates. Those who survived became cloud adults, meaning they spread the bacteria to others, even the nonvaccinated.
In modern COVID days, we would call it shedding. The vaccinated infecting the nonvaccinated. Pleasing coincidence. Right? Frederick Gates then.
Bill Gates now. Rockefeller initiative then. Rockefeller initiative now. Disease developed in Fort Riley, US then. Disease developed in Wuhan, China now.
Close down societies then. Closed down societies now. Clowed adults then. Shedding now. All for our own good, our own safety back then and now.