reSee.it - Related Post Feed

apocalypseos
Posted - April 27, 2022 at 10:51 AM
Saved - May 6, 2024 at 1:42 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Russia was initially reluctant to get involved in combat in Syria, but eventually entered the war using air power. The US is accused of waging a war of aggression in Syria, aiming to cause famine and freeze the civilian population. The Caesar sanctions imposed on Syria were brutal, and there are allegations of the US being aware of the Beirut explosion. Russia's actions in Ukraine were an attempt to preempt an attack by Ukraine. The decision of peace or war is made in Washington, DC. The use of nuclear weapons against Russia is deemed insane. The life of Russia depends on stopping NATO from advancing to their borders. The world must recognize the need for a new paradigm for the future.

@apocalypseos - 🅰pocalypsis 🅰pocalypseos 🇷🇺 🇨🇳 🅉

“Russia was extremely reluctant to get involved in combat in Syria. The war began in 2011 when US began coordinating with terrorist groups. Al Qaeda has always been our proxy force on the ground. They together with ISIS have carried out the mission of the US” — Col. Richard Black https://t.co/nwmwaCZee5

Video Transcript AI Summary
Russia initially resisted involvement in Syria, where the US supported Al Qaeda through covert operations. The CIA supplied weapons, including anti-tank and anti-air missiles, to Al Qaeda in Idlib province. The US used proxies like Al Qaeda and ISIS to overthrow Syria's government. In Aleppo, the Syrian Army, Hezbollah, and Iranian-backed troops were key players. Similar proxy tactics are seen in Ukraine.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Russia was extremely reluctant to get involved in combat in Syria. The war began in 2011 when the United States landed, Central Intelligence Operatives to begin coordinating with Al Qaeda and other terrorist groups. And, we have been unwavering supporters of Al Qaeda since before the war formally began. We are supporters of Al Qaeda today where they're bottled up in Idlib province. The CIA supplied them under secret operation Timber Sycamore. We gave them all of their anti tank weapons, all of their anti air missiles. And, Al Qaeda has always been our proxy, force on the ground. They, together with ISIS, have carried out the mission of the United States together with a a great number of affiliates that really are kind of interchange where you have the free Syrian army, soldiers move from ISIS to Al Qaeda Qaeda to free Syrian Army rather fluidly. And, so we we started that war, but but the United States has a strategic policy of using proxies to engage in war. And our objective was overthrow the legitimate government of Syria. And in order to do that, we employed, proxy soldiers who were the, the, the most vile of all terrorists. Something very similar is happening right now in, in Ukraine. But going back to Aleppo, the the Syrian Army together with, with Hezbollah, which was very effective, there were some, some troops that were organized by Iran also. But it was pretty much, a Syrian show.

@apocalypseos - 🅰pocalypsis 🅰pocalypseos 🇷🇺 🇨🇳 🅉

“After four years, Aleppo had enormous destruction. At that point, the Russians at the invitation of the legitimate Syrian government entered the war but not as a ground force. Their air power was very effective.” — Col. Richard Black https://t.co/jmYNensgyS

Video Transcript AI Summary
After 4 years of brutal urban combat in Aleppo, Russia joined the war with air support, not ground forces. Their assistance in the last year tipped the balance, leading to a grand victory. Blaming Russia for Aleppo's destruction is unfounded, as they were not there when it happened. This narrative is part of propaganda. Translation: After 4 years of intense fighting in Aleppo, Russia entered the war with air support, not ground troops. Their help in the final year turned the tide, resulting in a major victory. Accusing Russia of causing Aleppo's destruction is baseless, as they were not present during the devastation. This is simply part of a propaganda narrative.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: They had fought this bitter urban combat, very brutal, very deadly, and they had fought it for 4 years before Russia ever joined the battle. So after 4 years, the city of Aleppo had enormous destruction. And, at that point, the, the Russians at the invitation of, of the legitimate government of Syria entered the war. But unlike, unlike many of the the media reports, they did not, enter the war as a ground force. Now, they had some small ground forces. They had military police, they had a few artillery units, a few special operations people, and they had quite a number of advisers and that sort of thing. But they were not a a significant ground force. On the other hand, they were a significant and very effective air force, that supplemented the the Syrian air force. It really was just the last year of the war, the the battle of for Aleppo, just the last year that they entered and their air power was was very effective. And, by this time, the Syrians had pretty well worn down the, the, the terrorist forces and, the, the Russian assistance was able to tip the, tip the balance and, Aleppo was the grand victory of the entire Syrian war. But to blame the Russians for the the massive destruction that took place within Aleppo, it it's bizarre because they they were not there. They were not even present when this happened. So, the the This is simply another part of the propaganda narrative which is

@apocalypseos - 🅰pocalypsis 🅰pocalypseos 🇷🇺 🇨🇳 🅉

“The US war against Syria is a war of aggression. The US invaded. We put troops on the ground. It was a seizure. John Kerry was frustrated at the tremendous victory by the Syrian Armed Forces against Al Qaeda and ISIS.” — Col. Richard Black https://t.co/NbKYmIU9QP

Video Transcript AI Summary
The US initiated the war in Syria through the CIA Special Activity Center, seizing a significant part of the country illegally. John Kerry mentioned a Plan B involving the American seizure of northern Syria, a vital breadbasket for the Syrian people.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The United States war against Syria is a war of aggression. We we put the, Central Intelligence. It's a highly secretive CIA Special Activity Center. These are kind of the James Bond guys of the Central Intelligence Agency. Total Machiavellian, They will do anything. They have there's no it's no holds barred with these guys. We sent them in and we started the war in Syria. The war didn't exist until we sent the CIA to coordinate with Al Qaeda elements. So we began the war and, we were not invited into Syria. In fact, the the United States has seized 2 significant parts of Syria. 1 is a very major part. The, the Euphrates River bisects or doesn't bisect. It it it carves off about a third of the northern part of of Syria. The United States invaded that portion. We actually put troops on the ground, illegal against any standard international law of war. It was it was a, just a seizure. And this was, this was something that was referred to by John Kerry, who was then the Secretary of State. And he, he, he was frustrated at the tremendous victory by the Syrian Armed Forces against Al Qaeda and ISIS. And he said, well, we Plan b was the American seizure of that northern portion of Syria. The importance of of taking that part of Syria is that it is the bread basket for all of the Syrian people.

@apocalypseos - 🅰pocalypsis 🅰pocalypseos 🇷🇺 🇨🇳 🅉

“Syria had a significant wheat surplus before the war. We wanted to take the wheat away to cause famine. By stealing the oil we could freeze the civilian population. We wanted to starve and freeze to death the Syrians.” — Col. Richard Black https://t.co/EEtKBm4pat

Video Transcript AI Summary
Syria had a surplus of wheat before the war, but we wanted to create famine by taking it away. We also seized oil and gas fields to disrupt transportation and freeze the population during winter. Despite our efforts, the resilient Syrian people resisted against overwhelming military force for over a decade. To regain control, the US imposed harsh CAESAR sanctions on Syria.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Syria actually had a significant wheat surplus, and the people were very well fed in Syria before the war. We wanted to take the weed away to cause famine among the Syrian people. The other thing we were able to do is to seize the major part of the the oil and natural gas fields. Those also were produced in that northern portion beyond the Euphrates River. And the idea was that by stealing the oil and the and the gas, we would be able to shut down the transportation system. And at the same time, during the Syrian winters, we could freeze to death the Syrian civilian population which in many cases were living in in rubble where where the these terrorist armies with mechanized divisions had attacked and just totally destroyed these these cities and left people just living in little pockets of rubble. We we wanted to starve and we wanted to freeze to death the people of Syria, and that was plan b. Now we became frustrated at a certain point that somehow these Syrians, these darn Syrians, it's a tiny little country. And why are these people resilient? They're fighting against 2 thirds of the entire military and industrial force of the world, how can a count can a nation of 23,000,000 people possibly withstand this for over a decade? And so we decided we had to take action or we were gonna totally lose Syria. And so, the US Congress imposed the CAESAR sanctions. The CAESAR sanctions were the most brutal sanctions ever imposed on ever any nation.

@apocalypseos - 🅰pocalypsis 🅰pocalypseos 🇷🇺 🇨🇳 🅉

“Caesar sanctions were the most brutal sanctions ever imposed on any nation. We cut off medical supplies so that Syrian women would die of breast cancer. CIA was aware of the nation that carried out Beirut explosion.” — Col. Richard Black https://t.co/ZHq4v5VxcV

Video Transcript AI Summary
The CAESAR sanctions imposed on Syria were harsh, including a naval blockade and devaluation of their currency. Medical supplies were cut off, leading to preventable deaths. A mysterious explosion in Lebanon's harbor, possibly orchestrated, devastated the country and severed a vital lifeline to Syria. It is suspected that the CIA may have been involved in this destructive act.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The CAESAR sanctions were the most brutal sanctions ever imposed on ever any nation. I mean, during the Second World War, sanctions were not nearly as strict as they were on Syria. We weren't at war with Syria, and yet we were in we had a, we had a naval blockade, around the the country. We devalued their currency through the SWIFT system for international payments, making it impossible for them to purchase medications. So you had Syrian women who would contract breast cancer, just like we have here in this country. But instead of here in this country where breast cancer has become relatively treatable, we cut off the medical supplies so that the women in Syria would die of breast cancer because they could not get the medications because we slammed their their, their, dollars through the swift system. The one of the last things that we did, and and the evidence is is vague on it, but there was a mysterious explosion in the harbor of, of in in Lebanon. And, it was a massive explosion of a of a shipload of of, ammonium nitrate fertilizer. It killed 100 of of Lebanese people. It, wounded 1,000 and 1,000, destroyed the economy of Lebanon. And most importantly, it destroyed the banking system of Lebanon, which was one of the few lifelines remaining to Syria. I don't think that explosion was accidental. I think it was orchestrated and I suspect that the Central Intelligence Agency was aware of the nation that carried out that that action to destroy Beirut Harbor.

@apocalypseos - 🅰pocalypsis 🅰pocalypseos 🇷🇺 🇨🇳 🅉

“You see this Machiavellian approach where we use unlimited force and violence and at the same time we control the global media to where we erase all discussions of what’s truly happening.” — Col. Richard Black https://t.co/GRuGVfusKo

Video Transcript AI Summary
We use unlimited force and control the global media to hide the truth from the public. People believe everything is done for good reasons, but it's not.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Throughout, you see this this Machiavellian approach where we use unlimited force and violence. And at the same time, we control the the global media to where we erase all discussions of what's truly happening. So to the to the the man, the woman in the street, they think things are fine, everything is is being done for altruistic reasons, but it's not.

@apocalypseos - 🅰pocalypsis 🅰pocalypseos 🇷🇺 🇨🇳 🅉

“We facilitated the movement of Islamic terrorists from 100 countries. They could murder the husbands and own their wives and children. There was a campaign of rape in Syria. Pedophiles wanted the small children.” — Col. Richard Black https://t.co/ChBUAC8fF5

Video Transcript AI Summary
We allied with Al Qaeda and ISIS, using them against the Syrian government. Terrorists from 100 countries joined them, engaging in organized rape and creating slave markets. They were allowed to kill husbands, own wives and children, and rape widows and young children. This led to a horrific campaign of violence and exploitation in Syria.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Making war on a civilian population is a crime of of grave significance in in the law of war. One of the things that we did as we as we allied ourselves with Al Qaeda and on and off with ISIS I mean, we fought ISIS in in a very serious way, but at the same time, we often employed them to use against the Syrian government. So it's kind of a love hate, but we have always worked with the with the terrorists. They were the they were the core. We facilitated the movement of of Islamic terrorists from a 100 countries, and they came and they joined ISIS, they joined Al Qaeda, they joined the Free Syrian Army, all of these different ones. And one of the things that they knew when they arrived is that they were lawfully entitled to murder the husbands. I'm not talking about military people. I'm talking about civilian. They could murder the husbands, they could kill them, and then they could possess and own their wives and their children. And they did it in vast numbers. And so there was a, there was a campaign of rape. It was an organized campaign of rape across the nation of Syria and, there, there actually were slave markets that, that arose in certain of these, rebel areas where they they actually had price lists of of the different women. And interestingly, the highest prices went to the youngest children because there were great number of pedophiles and the pedophiles wanted to possess small children because under the laws that were applied, they were permitted to rape these children repeatedly. They're able to rape the widows of the slain soldiers or the slain civilians.

@apocalypseos - 🅰pocalypsis 🅰pocalypseos 🇷🇺 🇨🇳 🅉

“There were tens, hundreds of thousands of Syrian women impregnated by terrorists imported into Syria that it was necessary to change the law so that they wouldn't have to be returned to their ISIS father.” — Col. Richard Black https://t.co/tIOE4ZSJA3

Video Transcript AI Summary
In 2016, President Assad told me they changed citizenship laws due to children of Syrian women impregnated by terrorists. The new law allowed these children to have Syrian citizenship instead of being sent to their ISIS fathers. This highlights the cruelty of war and the inhumanity imposed on people for political gain, like overthrowing governments or seizing resources. This policy is evident in the current administration's stance against Russia.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This was so bad that I spoke with, President Assad who shared with me that they were in the process when I visited in 2016. I was, I was in a number of battle zones in, in the capital. And I met with the president and he said that at that time, they were working on legislation in the parliament to change the law of citizenship. They had always followed the Islamic law which was that that a child citizenship derived from the father. But there were so many tens, hundreds of thousands of Syrian women impregnated by these terrorists who were imported into Syria that it was necessary to change the law so that they would have Syrian citizenship and they wouldn't have to be returned to their ISIS father in Saudi Arabia or in Tunisia. They could be retained in, in Syria. And I checked later and that law was passed and was implemented, but it just shows that the utter cruelty when we fight these wars, we have no limits on the the cruelty and the in inhumanity that we're prepared to impose on the people, making them suffer so that somehow that will translate into overthrowing the government and, perhaps taking taking their oil, taking their their resources? Clearly, the policy against Russia today by the current administration. Yes.

@apocalypseos - 🅰pocalypsis 🅰pocalypseos 🇷🇺 🇨🇳 🅉

“Russia is perhaps more blessed with natural resources than any other nation. People want to break up Russia to make trillionaires by the dozens. A drive towards Russia began almost immediately after USSR dissolved in 1991.” — Col. Richard Black https://t.co/lkRDzvCKUf

Video Transcript AI Summary
Russia is rich in natural resources, like grain, oil, aluminum, and fertilizers, making it a key player in the global economy. Some see breaking up Russia as a way to profit immensely. After the Soviet Union dissolved in 1991, NATO should have disbanded since its purpose was to counter the Soviet Union. Instead, NATO persisted, needing a new enemy to justify its existence. Russia sought to join the West, even meeting with Gazprom's leader.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Russia is perhaps more, more blessed with natural resources than any other nation on earth. They are a major producer of grain, of oil, of aluminum, of, of, fertilizers, of of of an immense number of things that tie into the the whole global economy. And, no doubt, there are people who look at this and say, you know, if we could somehow break up Russia itself, there will be fortunes made to where trillionaires will be made by the dozens. And, there there's some attraction to that. Certainly, you've seen some of this taking place already, with foreign interests taking over Ukraine and taking their vast resources. But, we we have we have we began a drive towards Russia almost immediately after the Soviet Union dissolved in 1991. The Soviet Union dissolved. The Warsaw Pact dissolved. And unfortunately, one of the one of the great tragedies of history is that we failed to dissolve NATO. The sole purpose of NATO was to defend against the Soviet Union. The Soviet Union no longer existed. We the NATO went toe to toe with the Warsaw Pact. The Warsaw Pact was gone. It no longer existed. There was no purpose in NATO continuing to exist. However, we retained it, and it could not exist unless it had an enemy. Russia was desperate to become part of the West. They I met with the head of Gazprom.

@apocalypseos - 🅰pocalypsis 🅰pocalypseos 🇷🇺 🇨🇳 🅉

“Russia went from an officially atheist country to the most Christianized nation in Europe by far. The gov't is very supportive of the church and the Christian faith. The US has a longstanding strategy to expand the empire.” — Col. Richard Black https://t.co/f5Z2okSB1T

Video Transcript AI Summary
Ukraine transitioned from atheism to Christianity, with strong government support for the church. They changed laws to define marriage as between a man and a woman, restricted abortion, and stopped overseas adoptions. The US has a history of expanding its empire, like in the Middle East, but faced resistance. Now, the US is moving eastward towards the Ukrainian or Russian border.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: They went from being an officially atheist country to where they became the most Christianized major nation in Europe by far. Not only were the people the most Christianized people, in any major country in Europe. But the government itself was very supportive of the church, of of the Christian faith. They, they altered their constitution to say that marriage was a union of man 1 man and 1 woman. They became very restrictive on the practice of abortion. They ended the practice of of, overseas adoptions, where some people were, were going to Russia and adopting little boys for immoral purposes. So, so they became a a totally different culture. And, in any event, the United States has has we have this long standing strategy, this political military strategy of expanding the empire. We did it in the Middle East where we attempted to create a massive neocolonial empire. It's, it became rather frayed. The people did not want it and, it it it seems to be, doomed to extinction sometime, but it may go on for another 100 years. But in any event, we are trying to do something similar as we roll to the east right up virtually to the, to the Ukrainian border or to to the Russian border rather.

@apocalypseos - 🅰pocalypsis 🅰pocalypseos 🇷🇺 🇨🇳 🅉

“A tremendous number of innocent Ukrainian soldiers and a lot of Russian soldiers will die needlessly. It breaks my heart. The US and NATO do not care how many Ukrainians die — not civilians, women, children, or soldiers.” — Col. Richard Black https://t.co/JswYOvyn3P

Video Transcript AI Summary
The US and UK are now fully supporting the war in Ukraine, aiming for victory at any cost by sending large amounts of military weapons. This approach will lead to unnecessary deaths of innocent Ukrainian and Russian soldiers, many of whom are young. The speaker expresses sadness over the loss of life on both sides, highlighting the lack of concern from the US and NATO for the lives lost in the conflict. The situation is likened to a football game where winning is prioritized over the well-being of the players.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The, the US and UK position on the war in Ukraine, just over these last few weeks has has now become not only supporting the war, but, victory at all costs. This has been declared by defense secretary Austin and others. And they are pumping in huge quantities of not only defensive, but offensive military weaponry to the Kyiv regime. What do you what do you see as the consequence of this policy? Speaker 1: I think I think one thing that it will do, is it will ensure that a tremendous number of innocent Ukrainian soldiers will die needlessly. A lot of Russian soldiers will die needlessly. These are kids. You know, kids kids go off to war. I went off to war as a kid. You think your country, right or wrong, everything they're doing is fine. I it just it breaks my heart when I look at the the faces of of young Russian boys who have been who have been gunned down, in some cases, very criminally by Ukrainian forces. And likewise, I see Ukrainian, young men who who are being slaughtered on the battlefield. We don't care. The United States and NATO, we do not care how many Ukrainians die. Not civilians, not women, not children, not soldiers. We do not care. We are it's it's it's become a great football game. You know, we've got our team. They've got our team. Rah Rah. We wanna get the biggest score and run it up. And, you know, we don't care how many how many of our players get, get, crippled on the on the playing field, as long as we win. Now we are shipping fantastic quantities of weapons.

@apocalypseos - 🅰pocalypsis 🅰pocalypseos 🇷🇺 🇨🇳 🅉

“President Putin made a desperate effort to stop the march towards war. He put specific written peace proposals on the table with NATO because Ukraine was massing troops to attack Donbass. NATO dismissed it.” — Col. Richard Black https://t.co/td5HgQO12b

Video Transcript AI Summary
Defense industries are bloated with tax dollars. Russia is likely to prevail in the conflict with Ukraine. Putin tried to prevent war by proposing peace to NATO in December 2021, but they ignored him. When armed Ukrainians approached the border, Putin felt compelled to act first. The Russian attack was not preplanned and lacked the typical 3 to 1 advantage of an attacker.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: All of these defense industries have become tremendously bloated with with, tax dollars. I don't think it's ultimately going to change the outcome. I think that, I think that Russia will prevail. The Ukrainians are in a very awkward strategic position, in the east. If you if you look at the way that this unfolded, president Putin made a desperate effort to to stop the march towards war. Back in in December of 2021, he went so far as to put specific written proposals on the table with NATO, peace proposals to to diffuse what was coming about. Because at this point, Ukraine was massing troops to attack the Donbas. And, so he was trying to head this off. He didn't want war. And, NATO just blew it off, just dismissed it, never took it seriously, never went into serious negotiations. At that point, Putin, seeing that, that armed Ukrainians with weapons to kill Russian troops were literally on their borders decided he had to strike first. Now you could see that this was not this was not some preplanned attack. This was not like, like Hitler's attack into Poland, where the the the standard rule of thumb is that you always have a 3 to 1 advantage when you are the attacker. You have to mass 3 times as many tanks and and artillery and planes and men as the other side has. In fact, when Russia went in, they they went in sort of with what they had, what they could cobble together on short notice.

@apocalypseos - 🅰pocalypsis 🅰pocalypseos 🇷🇺 🇨🇳 🅉

“Donbass did not join with the revolutionary gov't that conducted the coup of 2014. Ukraine had massed this enormous army to attack Donbass. Russia was forced to go in to preempt that planned attack by Ukraine. ” — Col. Richard Black https://t.co/KZbLbmgFAA

Video Transcript AI Summary
The Donbas region in Ukraine declared independence from the revolutionary government in 2014, leading to a conflict with Ukraine. Russia intervened to prevent a planned Ukrainian attack, hoping to avoid casualties. Unlike American tanks in Vietnam, a Russian tank stopped when civilians blocked its path, showing cautious rules of engagement.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Now the Donbas is adjacent to Russia. It is a a portion of Ukraine that did not join, with the revolutionary government that conducted the coup in 2014 and overthrew the the government of of Ukraine. They they refused to become a part of the new revolutionary, government of Ukraine and, so they they declared their independence and, Ukraine had massed this enormous army to attack against the Donbas. And so Russia was forced to go in to preempt that, that planned attack by Ukraine. And, you could see that Russia very much hoped that they could conduct this special operation without unduly causing casualties for the Ukrainians because they they they think of the Ukrainians or at least they did think of the Ukrainians as as brother Slavs, that they they wanted to have good relations. But there there was a famous picture with a a Russian tank that had been stopped by a gathering of maybe 40 civilians who just walked out in the road and blocked the road and the tanks stopped. I can tell you, in Vietnam, if we had a bunch of people who who stood in the way of an American tank going through, that tank would not have slowed down in the slightest. It wouldn't have honked the horn. It wouldn't have done anything. Wouldn't have fired a warning shot. It would have just gone on. And and, and I think that's more typical. I'm not I'm not criticizing the Americans. I I would I was there and I was fighting, and I probably would've would've driven the tanks straight through myself. But what I'm saying is that the the rules of engagement for the Russians were very, very cautious.

@apocalypseos - 🅰pocalypsis 🅰pocalypseos 🇷🇺 🇨🇳 🅉

“Russia did not bomb the electrical system, media systems, water systems, bridges, train systems, power plants hoping that peace can be achieved. It didn't work. The decision of peace or war is made in Washington, DC.” — Col. Richard Black https://t.co/XOzKD9t6jb

Video Transcript AI Summary
The Russians tried to avoid causing destruction in Ukraine during the conflict, hoping for a quick resolution. However, Ukrainian resistance was strong, escalating the situation. Russia controls the air but has not targeted critical infrastructure like trains, power plants, or government buildings in Kyiv. The speaker believes that the decision for peace or war lies with Washington, using Ukrainians as pawns in the conflict.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: They didn't want to create a great deal of hatred and animosity. They the Russians did not go in. They did not bomb, the electrical system, the the media systems, the water systems, all of these, the the the bridges and so forth, they tried to retain, the infrastructure of Ukraine in good shape because they they wanted it to get back. They just wanted this to be over with and get back to normal. It didn't work. The Ukrainians, the, the resistance was unexpectedly, hard. The Ukrainian soldiers fought with with great great valor, great heroism. And, and so now the the the game has been upped and it's become much, much more serious. But, it is amazing to look and, and to see that Russia dominates the air. They haven't knocked out the train systems. They haven't knocked out power plants. They haven't knocked out, so many things. They've never bombed the, the the buildings in the center of Kyiv. They, you know, the the capital of, of Ukraine. They haven't bombed the the buildings where the parliament meets. They they've been incredibly reserved about these things, hoping against hope that peace could be achieved. But I don't think I don't think Ukraine has anything to do with the decision about peace or war. I think the decision about peace or war is made in Washington DC. As long as we want the war to continue, we will fight that war using Ukrainians as proxies, and we will fight it to the last Ukrainian death.

@apocalypseos - 🅰pocalypsis 🅰pocalypseos 🇷🇺 🇨🇳 🅉

“According to Turkish media, 50 French senior officers are trapped in Azovstal steel plant in Mariupol. French soldiers have been on the ground directing the battle, kept under wraps. Marine Le Pen would have won.” — Col. Richard Black https://t.co/C1Qwopae61

Video Transcript AI Summary
The Turkish media reported that Russian forces won the siege at Mariupol, except for a steel plant where Ukrainian soldiers and 50 French officers are trapped. The presence of French officers was kept secret due to the recent French elections. It is speculated that French officers may have fired missiles sinking the Russian flagship. NATO may have maintained control over these sensitive missiles.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The Turkish media just published an article saying that there at, Mariupol where there was a great siege that the the Russians ultimately won. The one area they haven't taken over is this tremendous steel plant. There are a lot of, a lot of Ukrainian soldiers who are hold up there. And now it has come to light that apparently there are 50 French senior officers who are trapped, in that steel plant along with the Ukrainians. The French soldiers have been on the ground fighting, directing the battle, and this was kept under Rapp's ultra secret, because of the French elections that just occurred. Had the French people known that there were a large number of French officers trapped and probably going to die in that steel plant, the elections would have gone the other way. Marine Le Pen would have won. And, so it was very important that for the entire deep state that it not come to light that these French officers were there. We know that there are NATO officers who are present in on the ground in Ukraine as advisors and so forth, we run the risk. Now, my guess is, and this is, this is a guess, I, I could be wrong, but the, the flagship of the, the Russian Black Sea Fleet, the, Moskva was sunk, as a result of being struck by, anti, anti ship missiles. My guess is that those missiles, I think there's a good chance they were fired by the French. Now that's, I could be wrong, but those missiles are so ultra sensitive and so dangerous to our ships that I don't think that NATO would trust the missiles to Ukrainians or to anybody else. I think I think they have to be maintained under NATO control.

@apocalypseos - 🅰pocalypsis 🅰pocalypseos 🇷🇺 🇨🇳 🅉

“Two Republican senators said we might have to use nuclear weapons against Russia. That is insane. Russia has hypersonic missiles that can absolutely evade detection. There would be no human life in Washington, DC.” — Col. Richard Black https://t.co/aA7K11HN1E

Video Transcript AI Summary
Two Republican senators suggest using nuclear weapons against Russia, sparking concerns about the devastating impact of a thermonuclear war. Russia's hypersonic missiles can bypass US defenses and target major cities like San Francisco, Los Angeles, Chicago, Detroit, Baltimore, Washington DC, and New York City. With a powerful fleet of nuclear submarines, Virginia, including Northern Virginia and the Pentagon in Arlington County, would face total annihilation. The nation's capital would be devoid of human life in the aftermath.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We have 2, 2 Republican. I I happen to be Republican, but 2 Republican, US senators who have said that, well, we might just need to use nuclear, nuclear weapons against Russia. That is insane. I I think it's important that people begin to discuss what a thermonuclear war would would mean. We need to understand. We we think, oh, well, we we're big and we're bad and we have all this stuff. Russia is roughly comparable to the United States in nuclear power. They have hypersonic missiles that we do not have that can absolutely evade, any, any detection, any time way detection, and they can fire missiles from, from Russia and reach San Francisco, Los Angeles, Chicago, Detroit, Baltimore, Washington DC, New York City. And if you think about just Virginia where I happen to live, if if there were a nuclear war and keep in mind, they also have a very large and effective fleet of nuclear submarines that lie off the coast of the United States. They have a great number of of nuclear tipped missiles and they can evade any defenses we have. So just in Virginia, if you look at it, all of Northern Virginia would be essentially annihilated. There would there would hardly be any human life remaining in Loudoun County, Prince William County, Fairfax County, Arlington, Alexandria. The Pentagon lies in, in Arlington County. The Pentagon would simply be a glowing mass of of molten sand. There would be no human life there and there would be no human life for many miles around it. There would be no life remaining in, in the nation's capital.

@apocalypseos - 🅰pocalypsis 🅰pocalypseos 🇷🇺 🇨🇳 🅉

“Not only would everybody be killed but it would probably be impossible for people to inhabit New York City for hundreds of years after a nuclear war. The life of Russia depends on stopping NATO from advancing to their borders.” — Col. Richard Black https://t.co/qCwReEPqMZ

Video Transcript AI Summary
New York City would be destroyed if a war broke out, making it uninhabitable for centuries. Russia's survival depends on preventing NATO from advancing into Ukraine. American leaders prioritize personal gain over the well-being of the country. Speaking out against war comes at a cost. Ukraine's conflict does not affect the US, yet risks lives needlessly. Military officials prioritize career advancement over the interests of the American people.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Probably New York City itself, not only would everybody be killed, but it would probably be impossible for people to inhabit New York City for 100 of years afterwards. That not only would it cease to to be a place of of vibrant human life, but probably going out, for, you know, maybe half a millennium, it would not recover any sort of civilization. We need to understand the gravity of what we're doing. The life of Russia depends on stopping NATO from moving, advancing further right into Ukraine, right to their borders. They cannot afford not to fight this war. They cannot afford not to win this war. Ukraine is is meaningless to America. It has no no impact on our day to day lives, and yet we're playing this reckless game that, that risks the lives of all people in the United States and Western Europe for nothing. Just absolutely for nothing. We now have yes men. These these are not people whose principle devotion is to the United States and its people. Their principal devotion is to their careers and their ability to network with other, military officers upon retirement. There's a there's a very strong network that can place military, generals into think tanks where they promote war into, organizations like Raytheon and, and, there's there's quite a personal price that you pay for saying, hey. Stop. You know, war is, war is not in the interest of the American people.

@apocalypseos - 🅰pocalypsis 🅰pocalypseos 🇷🇺 🇨🇳 🅉

“It is very difficult to get into senior ranks if you are guided by principle, patriotism, and devotion to the people of this nation. There is going to have to be enormous pain. Major countries support Russia.” — Col. Richard Black https://t.co/2PqqEo24e9

Video Transcript AI Summary
We need courageous leaders who prioritize principles and patriotism in senior ranks. A president must shake things up to remove dangerous individuals. Americans must realize the importance of establishing a just world through dialogue with other nations. Unfortunately, significant turmoil may be necessary to drive this change. The media's bias has hindered public perception. Major countries like China, Brazil, South Africa, Saudi Arabia, and India support Russia in the ongoing conflict.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If we had if we had a better quality of of individual, we would have people with the courage who would say, I I don't care what it cost me personally. It is very difficult to get into the senior ranks if you are an individual guided by principle and patriotism and devotion to the people of this nation. That's just not how it works. And, at some point we need a president who will go in and, and, and shake the tree and bring a lot of these people falling down from it because, they're they're dangerous. They're very dangerous to America. Speaker 1: Why and what will it take to get Americans to recognize that we can and must sit down with Russians and with Chinese and with all other nations and establish a true, a just world based on the, dignity of man and the right to development and security. Speaker 0: I think, unfortunately, there's going to have to be enormous pain to drive that just as there was with the piece of of Westphalia. A nuclear war would do it. A an economic cataclysm of unprecedented proportions resulting from the from the, unbridled printing of money that we've engaged in over, the last 20 years. There are things that that could bring it about. But at this point, the media has been so totally censored, and so biased that, the American people really don't don't have the perception of the need for anything of that sort. In fact, there are major countries of the world that lean towards Russia in this war, starting with China, but then Brazil. You've got South Africa, Saudi Arabia, India. India is tremendous, tremendously, supportive of Russia.

@apocalypseos - 🅰pocalypsis 🅰pocalypseos 🇷🇺 🇨🇳 🅉

“Much of the world does not accept the latest propaganda about war crimes. The Russians held Bucha for a month. If you were going to slaughter a bunch of people wouldn't they all be in one place? It makes no sense.” — Col. Richard Black https://t.co/x2XwLpiYZB

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker questions the validity of claims regarding war crimes in Bucha, Ukraine. They highlight the lack of evidence and motive behind the alleged killings, pointing out inconsistencies in the narrative. The speaker questions why the victims were scattered along a road if a massacre had occurred, casting doubt on the accusations against the Russians.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The idea that somehow we we have this enormously just cause, it doesn't strike a great deal of the world that it is just. And there much of the world does not accept the the latest propaganda about, about war crimes. This this thing about Bucha, the that that's probably the most prominent of all the war crimes discussions. And what was Bucha? There was a there was a film taken, of of a vehicle driving down the road in in Bucha, which had been recaptured from the Russians. And every 100 feet or so, there was some person with his hands, zip tied behind his back and he'd been killed. This was discovered it was not announced until 4 days after the Ukrainians had retaken Bucha. Now we knew almost nothing about it. We we actually didn't even have proof that people had been killed, but assuming they had, we didn't know where they had been killed. We did not know who they were. We did not know who killed them. We did not know why they were killed. No one could provide an adequate motive for the Russians to have killed them. The Russians held Bucha for a month. If they were gonna kill them, why didn't they kill them during that month? And if you're going to slaughter a bunch of people, wouldn't they all be in one place and wouldn't you gun them all down there? Why would they be distributed along a a roadside, you know, a mile along the way? It makes no sense.

@apocalypseos - 🅰pocalypsis 🅰pocalypseos 🇷🇺 🇨🇳 🅉

“My hunch is that Ukrainians killed off these people [in Bucha] after they moved in because they were friendly to the Russian troops. The Ukrainian hospital administrator boasted about giving orders to castrate Russian POWs.” — Col. Richard Black https://t.co/ttY5fBe8RI

Video Transcript AI Summary
Four days after the mayor of Bucha declared liberation, dead bodies appeared on the road. Speculation arises that Ukrainians may have killed those friendly to Russians. The media's lack of questioning allows for potential war crimes, such as the castration of Russian POWs, to go unnoticed.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What we do know is that 4 days after the the mayor of Bucha joyously announced that the the city was liberated 4 days after the Ukrainian army had moved in and their special, their their propaganda arm of the Ukrainian military were there, all of a sudden, there were these dead people on the road. How come they weren't there when the Russians were there? How come they only appeared after the Russians were gone? If I were, you know, if I were looking at as as as simply a standard criminal case and I was talking to to criminal investigation division or the FBI or or military police or something, I'd say, okay. The first thing, let's take a look at the, the Ukrainians. It, it, my guess would be, and, you know, you start with a hunch when you're investigating a crime, my hunch is that the Ukrainians killed off these people after they moved in and after they looked around and said, okay, who who was friendly towards the Russian troops while the Russians were here? We're gonna we're gonna execute them. That would be my guess because I don't see any motive for the Russians to have just sort of killed a few people on their way out of town. So so you have the and nobody questions these because because the corporate media is so monolithic. We know for a fact, from the mouth of the head of a Ukrainian hospital, the guy who who ran the hospital, he he boasted that he had given strict orders to all of his doctors that when, wounded, Russian POWs, when casualties were brought in, they were to be castrated. Now this is a horrific war crime admitted from the mouth of the hospital administrator

@apocalypseos - 🅰pocalypsis 🅰pocalypseos 🇷🇺 🇨🇳 🅉

“Russian POWs were to be castrated. This is a horrific war crime admitted by the hospital administrator. I can't think of a more horrific war crime ever. The Ukrainian soldiers gunned down wounded Russian soldiers.” — Col. Richard Black https://t.co/EKvfgaIO15

Video Transcript AI Summary
Russian POWs were subjected to horrific war crimes by Ukrainian soldiers, including castration and mass shootings. In one instance, wounded Russian soldiers were gunned down at a gathering point, some with plastic bags over their heads. The soldiers also executed unwounded POWs without hesitation. Despite the undeniable proof, major news outlets like ABC, MSNBC, CNN, and Fox News have remained silent on these atrocities.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Russian POWs, when casualties were brought in, they were to be castrated. Now, this is a horrific war crime admitted from the mouth of the hospital administrator and the Ukrainian government said, we'll kinda we'll look into that, you know, like, is it no big thing. I I I can't think of a more horrific war crime ever. Where did you hear about it on ABC and and MSNBC and CNN and Fox News? Not a whisper. And yet the proof is undeniable. We had we had another clip where there was a, a POW, gathering point where the Ukrainians would bring POWs to a central point for processing. And this is about a 7 minute video, and the Ukrainian soldiers simply gunned them all down. And, they had probably 30 of these, these wounded Russian soldiers lying on the ground. Some of them clearly dying from their wounds. Some of them, they put plastic bags over their head. Now these are these are guys who are laying there, sometimes fatally wounded with their hands zip tied behind their backs, and they've got plastic bags over their heads so that making it difficult to breathe. And because they can't raise their hands, they can't they can't take the bags off so that they can they can breathe. And then they at at the end of the video, they the the Ukrainians bring in a van, and there are 3 unwounded, Russian POWs. And without this flight of thought or hesitation, as the 3 come off and their their hands are bound behind their backs, they gun down 2 of them right on camera, and they fall over. And the third one gets on his knees and and begs, that that, you know, they won't hurt him. And then they gun him down. Just

@apocalypseos - 🅰pocalypsis 🅰pocalypseos 🇷🇺 🇨🇳 🅉

“We destroyed virtually everything in Iraq — military & civilian targets — w/o much discrimination. The Russians have tended to be more selective. The philosophy of ‘shock & awe’ is to destroy everything needed to sustain human life.” — Col. Richard Black https://t.co/ifojAoj4X8

Video Transcript AI Summary
During the Iraq war, the US conducted 100,000 sorties in 42 days, destroying everything in the country. In comparison, the Russians only flew 8,000 sorties in the same time frame, being more selective in their targets. The US approach was to use shock and awe to destroy all essential infrastructure, while the Russians have been less destructive in Ukraine. The vast difference in violence between the two conflicts is evident in the number of sorties flown.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I gotta tell you, it you go back to to the wars that we've fought when we when we invaded Iraq, the shock and awe. We destroyed, we destroyed virtually everything, in in Iraq, everything of of significance. Every we we bombed military and civilian targets, without much discrimination. The coalition flew a 100,000 sorties in 42 days. You compare that to the Russians who have only flown 8,000 sorties in about the same period of time. A 100,000 American bombs versus 8,000, not not bombs, but sorties of bombs, 100,000 versus 8,000 in about the same time. And, and I think the the Russians have tended to be more selective. Whereas we went out with the shock and all, the the the philosophy of shock and all is that you destroy everything that is needed to sustain human life and to for for a city to function. You knock out the water supply, the electrical supply, the the heat, the, you know, the oil, the gasoline so that you you knock out all of the major bridges. And then you just continue and you just destroy everything. Iraq is a is a relatively small country. Ukraine is a huge country. 100,000 sorties in 42 days, 8,000 sorties in about the same time. A tremendous difference in violence between what we did in Iraq and what they have done in Ukraine.

@apocalypseos - 🅰pocalypsis 🅰pocalypseos 🇷🇺 🇨🇳 🅉

“The hyperinflation may be the wake-up call that jolts the world into the recognition that we must have a new paradigm for the future and at that point, the Peace of Westphalia might become a possibility.” — Col. Richard Black (Video Clip 23/23) https://t.co/v2sxHhhhBb

Video Transcript AI Summary
We can't wait for a nuclear war to bring peace like the Peace of Westphalia. The hyperinflation crisis is already horrific, pushing citizens in Europe and the US to wake up and take responsibility. A petition calls for an international conference with major nations to end the horror and establish true peace through development. The Shiller Institute's efforts towards world peace are crucial. We need to shift towards a new paradigm for the future, where peace benefits everyone, not a zero-sum game. Hyperinflation might be the wake-up call needed for this change. Peace of Westphalia could be a possibility. Translation: The video discusses the urgency of addressing the current hyperinflation crisis to push for world peace through an international conference involving major nations. The Shiller Institute's efforts towards peace are praised, emphasizing the need for a new paradigm where peace benefits all. Hyperinflation could serve as a catalyst for this shift, potentially leading to a Peace of Westphalia-like agreement.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Considering that we can't wait for a nuclear war to provoke a new piece of Westphalia, And I would suggest that what you've described is already horrific enough. And when combined with the hyperinflationary breakdown now sweeping the western world, which everybody is being affected, we we believe that we have to take that as the adequate horror, and recognition of, of a descent into a dark age to motivate, citizens in Europe and the United States. And we are finding that there is a waking up of people who have not wanted to look at their responsibility to the human race as a whole in the past who now are forced to consider that, which is the basis on which we've called for this in this petition for an international conference of all nations with the US, Russia, China, India, and so forth, sitting down to, end this horror, but to also bring about a true a true peace for mankind and an era of peace through development. Speaker 1: I thank the Shiller Institute for the tremendous effort that you've made, towards, achieving world peace. It's, it, it is one of the most important efforts ever made. We really need to start thinking about peace and and about, the limits of warfare and, this idea that somehow, we need this zero sum game where where we take from you and and that enhances us. We're in a in a in a world where everyone can gain and prosper by peace. And, but I I I I'm concerned that the hyperinflation may be the wake up call that, that jolts the world into a recognition that we must have a new paradigm for the future. And I think the Peace of Westphalia at that point might become a possibility.
apocalypseos
Posted - April 28, 2022 at 2:22 AM
Saved - August 14, 2024 at 2:14 PM

@apocalypseos - 🅰pocalypsis 🅰pocalypseos 🇷🇺 🇨🇳 🅉

“Syria had a significant wheat surplus before the war. We wanted to take the wheat away to cause famine. By stealing the oil we could freeze the civilian population. We wanted to starve and freeze to death the Syrians.” — Col. Richard Black (Video Clip 4) https://t.co/A36oY04vkp https://t.co/v7ZJIxaKA2

Video Transcript AI Summary
Syria had a significant wheat surplus before the war, and there were plans to seize this wheat to create famine. Additionally, oil and gas fields in northern Syria were targeted to disrupt transportation and harm the civilian population during harsh winters. The goal was to starve and freeze the Syrian people, but their resilience against overwhelming military force frustrated these efforts. To regain control, the US Congress imposed the CAESAR sanctions, which were among the most severe sanctions ever placed on a nation.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Syria actually had a significant wheat surplus, and the people were very well fed in Syria before the war. We wanted to take the weed away to cause famine among the Syrian people. The other thing we were able to do is to seize the major part of the the oil and natural gas fields. Those also were produced in that northern portion beyond the Euphrates River. And the idea was that by stealing the oil and the and the gas, we would be able to shut down the transportation system. And at the same time, during the Syrian winters, we could freeze to death the Syrian civilian population which in many cases were living in in rubble where where the these terrorist armies with mechanized divisions had attacked and just totally destroyed these these cities and left people just living in little pockets of rubble. We we wanted to starve and we wanted to freeze to death the people of Syria, and that was plan b. Now we became frustrated at a certain point that somehow these Syrians, these darn Syrians, it's a tiny little country. And why are these people resilient? They're fighting against 2 thirds of the entire military and industrial force of the world, how can a count can a nation of 23,000,000 people possibly withstand this for over a decade? And so we decided we had to take action or we were gonna totally lose Syria. And so, the US Congress imposed the CAESAR sanctions. The CAESAR sanctions were the most brutal sanctions ever imposed on ever any nation.

@apocalypseos - 🅰pocalypsis 🅰pocalypseos 🇷🇺 🇨🇳 🅉

“The US war against Syria is a war of aggression. The US invaded. We put troops on the ground. It was a seizure. John Kerry was frustrated at the tremendous victory by the Syrian Armed Forces against Al Qaeda and ISIS.” — Col. Richard Black https://t.co/QrWnWMwT7J https://t.co/oKUm6QCrEm

Video Transcript AI Summary
The U.S. involvement in Syria is characterized as a war of aggression, initiated by the CIA's Special Activity Center, which coordinated with Al Qaeda elements. The conflict began after the U.S. sent operatives into Syria without invitation. The U.S. has seized significant areas, particularly a major part of northern Syria along the Euphrates River, which is considered illegal under international law. This seizure was acknowledged by former Secretary of State John Kerry, who expressed frustration over Syrian forces' victories against Al Qaeda and ISIS. The northern region is crucial as it serves as the breadbasket for the Syrian population.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The United States war against Syria is a war of aggression. We we put the, Central Intelligence. It's a highly secretive CIA Special Activity Center. These are kind of the James Bond guys of the Central Intelligence Agency. Total Machiavellian, They will do anything. They have there's no it's no holds barred with these guys. We sent them in and we started the war in Syria. The war didn't exist until we sent the CIA to coordinate with Al Qaeda elements. So we began the war and, we were not invited into Syria. In fact, the the United States has seized 2 significant parts of Syria. 1 is a very major part. The, the Euphrates River bisects or doesn't bisect. It it it carves off about a third of the northern part of of Syria. The United States invaded that portion. We actually put troops on the ground, illegal against any standard international law of war. It was it was a, just a seizure. And this was, this was something that was referred to by John Kerry, who was then the Secretary of State. And he, he, he was frustrated at the tremendous victory by the Syrian Armed Forces against Al Qaeda and ISIS. And he said, well, we Plan b was the American seizure of that northern portion of Syria. The importance of of taking that part of Syria is that it is the bread basket for all of the Syrian people.
Kanthan2030
Posted - February 27, 2023 at 9:53 AM
Saved - September 22, 2023 at 1:05 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Several Arab lawmakers visited Syria to end the chaos caused by a 12-year proxy war involving the US, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Turkey, Jordan, Israel, UK, and France. Syria was once a peaceful, prosperous, and diverse country. However, American imperialists and globalists destroyed it covertly, with jihadists from around the world fighting against Assad. Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and Jordan played significant roles, while Turkey benefited economically. Israel sought to steal natural gas and even supported Al Qaeda fighters. UK and France aided propaganda efforts. The US was the chief propagandist and weapons supplier, while Iran, Hezbollah, and Russia came to Assad's rescue. The country was divided into Al Qaeda-controlled Idlib and a Kurdish area. Arab leaders should reflect on their collaboration with imperialists and strive for cooperation, peace, and progress in the Middle East.

@Kanthan2030 - S.L. Kanthan

A 🧵on Syria. Yesterday, several senior Arab lawmakers visited Syria to end the chaos unleashed on the prosperous country for the last 12 years. Under the US leadership, the brutal proxy war conspiracy involved Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Turkey, Jordan, Israel, UK, France & more. https://t.co/B2B99gig3u

@Kanthan2030 - S.L. Kanthan

Syria was a peaceful, prosperous, secular Muslim country where all religious people lived peacefully -- Sunnis, Shiites, Alawites, Christians, Jews, Kurds etc. In 2009, the NY Times named Syria as one of the 10 best places in the world to visit! https://t.co/691208cGz1

@Kanthan2030 - S.L. Kanthan

But the mad American imperialists and globalists decided to destroy Syria for various reasons. Here's how a whole bunch of hyenas attacked the lion. (Sort of like how how NATO countries are attacking Russia. But the Syrian attack was done covertly) https://t.co/fzn298EpoB

@Kanthan2030 - S.L. Kanthan

Jihadists and terrorists flew into Syria from all over the world. At least 100,000 foreign Islamists fought against Assad in this fake "civil war." https://t.co/ZEFSjARoJA

@Kanthan2030 - S.L. Kanthan

Saudi Arabia and Qatar provided most of the funding -- billions of dollars for logistics, weapons, jihadist wages etc. Jordan was the base for CIA training for terrorists -- branded as moderate rebels. Just across the Syria-Jordan border, they ignited the first fire in 2011. https://t.co/BE23wlI4wC

@Kanthan2030 - S.L. Kanthan

Turkey was the prime logistics central for jihadists and weapons. Turkiye also benefited from this war: 🔹Syrian refugees who provided cheap labor 🔹Syrian oil sold by ISIS at a great discount 🔹Hope of grabbing a big chunk of Syria

@Kanthan2030 - S.L. Kanthan

Israel wanted to steal natural gas in Golan Heights, the land that Israel stole from Syria in 1967. Israel armed/funded Islamic jihadists! Yeah, how geopolitics works -- like US arming/funding Nazis in Ukraine. Israel even treated the wounded Al Qaeda fighters. https://t.co/oVjSt6iY7z

@Kanthan2030 - S.L. Kanthan

UK and France also played big roles. Defectors from Assad's government fled to Paris, got paid a lot, and worked against Syria. These secular guys were the propaganda faces for the jihadists. UK organized the White Helmets, the fake "humanitarian" group that was just Al Qaeda https://t.co/i7Hec0b1DZ

@Kanthan2030 - S.L. Kanthan

The US was Chief Propagandist and Chief Weapons Supplier. Insane lies emanated from US media every day; And thanks to the American Empire, everyone around the world repeated the same atrocity propaganda. https://t.co/o6qumBBxqB

@Kanthan2030 - S.L. Kanthan

And billions of dollars of deadly weapons were given to Al Qaeda/ISIS fighting Assad in Syria. All were sneaked into Syria through Turkiye. https://t.co/Y3aQTsWOlL

@Kanthan2030 - S.L. Kanthan

Assad & Syrian military fought bravely for 5 years. Then, it was about to collapse when Iran, Hezbollah and Russia came for rescue. However, USA managed to split the country and creat two regions: Idlib - Al Qaeda central; and a Kurdish area. Divide and Rule by psychopaths.

@Kanthan2030 - S.L. Kanthan

Let's hope that Arab leaders feel guilty and stupid for working with imperialists to destroy their own region. Middle East is a vital region in a multipolar world. Cooperation, peace and progress in this region is pivotal. End 🧵

TheThe1776
Posted - May 31, 2023 at 10:46 PM
Saved - June 25, 2023 at 3:57 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Ukraine has become a hub for organ trafficking, sex trafficking, and money laundering. The new transplant laws allow hospitals, prisons, military units, and orphanages to use the organs of anyone under their care. Black market surgeons profit from illegal organ trafficking, violating human rights. Doctors Without Borders and The Red Cross have been accused of human organ trafficking. The United States' involvement in Ukraine is to sacrifice Ukraine to destroy Ukraine in order to bleed Russia. The organ harvesting industry is a criminal enterprise, and it's best to state organ donation in your will.

@TheThe1776 - ꪻꫝể ꪻꫝể

1/6) Ukraine is the Money Laundering, Sex Trafficking and Organ Harvesting Capital of the World. This thread is about Organ Harvesting in Ukraine. On 04/14/2022 the Ukrainian Parliament passed a law 5610 which clear Ukraine to export Organs abroad. Organs were removed without consent and the laws were passed during ongoing military actions. These laws were promoted by former acting health minister Ulyana Suprun. Under the new transplants laws Hospitals, Prisons, Military Units, and Orphanages are free to use the organs of anyone under their care.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The Ukrainian Parliament passed laws allowing organ donation without consent, including from children, and permitting the sale of organs abroad. Private clinics have the right to harvest organs without doctors' or undertakers' consent. Lieutenant General Vladimir Konanov has witnessed the actions of "river doctors" who exploit these laws. Former acting Ukrainian health minister Ulyana Suprun and Mikhail Radutsky, owner of Ukraine's largest network of private clinics, support these laws. American journalist George Eliason has exposed illegal organ harvesting in Ukraine. Human trafficking and disappearances also increased during this time. Correspondence between Ukrainian and German individuals discussed organ supply from Don Bass. Code abbreviations were used for different organs.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: 16th 2021. The Ukrainian Parliament approved law number 5831. It stipulates Ukrainians, including children, can become organ donors posthumously without their notarized consent and without relatives' consent. Organs can be sold abroad. A special database exists that cooperates with foreign clinics. On April 14, 2022, the Ukrainian parliament passed another law, number 56 one zero. It exempts organ transplantation from VAT. The road to Supporting Ukrainian organs abroad was clear. Serbian lawyer, Gordon Petrunjevic, knows how so called black market transplant surgeons operated in his home country. A particular of transplantology laws adopted in Ukraine is this, The right to harvest organs is granted to unsupervised private clinics. Organs are removed without consent of doctors or undertakers. These laws were passed during ongoing military action. Lieutenant general Vladimir Konanov, consigned Dar has fought in many of Donbas's hotspots and has risen through the ranks from soldier to defense minister of the Donetsk People's Republic. He's seen enough evidence of what so called river doctors do. These laws are promoted by former acting Ukrainian health minister Ulyana Suprun, and Mikhail Radutsky, a member of Zelensky's servant of the People's Party. Radutsky owns Ukraine's largest network of private clinics, and his commercial interest is obvious. US citizen, or doctor Death as she's known in Ukraine, has said repeatedly, Ukrainian kidneys and corneas are welcomed in the west. Vasily Prozorov, a former Ukrainian security service officer who sided with Russia for ideological reasons in 2014, has documents confirming Suprun's criminal activities in Ukraine. Under the new transplant laws, The authorities of Ukrainian hospitals, prisons, military units, and orphanages are free to use the organs of anyone under their care. The law lifts the ban preventing a transplant surgeon from taking part in a council of doctors who certify the death of a patient or his brain, after which organs can be harvested. Speaker 1: Because The doctors can now take, organs, you know, who's to say when they did it? Because the net result is the same. The person's life is snuffed out. They're not alive. Can they complain? Except a doctor that's going to know the truth. Speaker 0: American journalist George Eliason has covered developments in Ukraine since Maidan. He's been involved in exhuming graves of civilians killed by Ukrainian death squads. He submitted materials he'd collected to the US Senate, after which funding for the Azot regimen was temporarily suspended. Speaker 1: From 2013 to 2014, human trafficking doubled in Ukraine. And Between, March 2014 and September 2014, 26 2,600 people went missing, and they weren't accounted for. Speaker 0: The first reports of illegal organ harvesting came around the same time. LPR colonel Vitaly Kiselyov, of cosign communist, has been defending his homeland since 2014 from the moment Ukraine attacked Donbas and started killing its citizens. Liberating his homeland, Vladimir Kononov found much evidence of the so called ripper doctors. Alexander Torba, a doctor emeritus of the Lhugan People's Republic, is also aware of these gruesome findings. In 2014, a group of Ukrainian hackers, Cyberbearkut, published correspondence between former Ukrainian prime minister Yulia Timoshenko's lawyer, Sergei Vlasinca, and German transplant surgeon, Olga Weber, discussing organ supply from Don Bass. Code abbreviations were used. Core, heart. Nep, Kidney. Hep, liver. Pan, pancreas. Pull, lungs.

@TheThe1776 - ꪻꫝể ꪻꫝể

2/6) The head of the Federal Reserve Center Sergey Gotye Chief Transplantologist said “Either you're a transplant surgeon or a crook… Black market surgeons aren't surgeons. They're people who profit from illegal organ trafficking…This is a product of war…it’s murdered... who had no intention to become donors. This is a violation of human rights, no one asked them…And, therefore, it is a criminal offence…”. Today’s Neo-Nazi will harvest the organs and sell it for a profit before they gas them and burn them in ovens.

Video Transcript AI Summary
We have a growing number of orders, but there are concerns about the quality of goods. Conditions are becoming more difficult, with security risks and delays in accessing materials. The Ukrainian government officials seem to be involved, as there is no investigation into the black market organ trade. Organ procurement may soon be carried out by Global Rescue, with a contract from the OSCE. There are reports of crematoria deployed in Ukraine, causing panic among border troops. The legendary commander GIVI witnessed the human organ black market targeting Europe, the US, and Israel. Neo-Nazis in Ukraine are said to be involved in organ harvesting. These disturbing findings were discovered in 2014 in a village called the communar.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We're getting more and more orders. Do I have enough people? Put it down. 15 core, 63 NEP, 35 HEP, 20 pan, five pull. Speaker 1: Got it. I've passed it on. Speaker 0: Sergei, I've placed another order with you, but there were a lot of poor quality goods in the last batch. You're letting me down. Speaker 1: Olga, you haven't been here. You don't see how things are, and conditions are getting tougher and tougher. Speaker 0: T is suffering. My people are getting access to material too late. Customers are waiting. Speaker 1: There's Fire. Bombs going off. How are we supposed to transfer your men? Ensuring security is very difficult. We have to move this stuff out on Our own. Speaker 0: Is there proper access to the badly wounded and hopeless cases? Speaker 1: There is a big risk of a and too many questions from the local staff. Speaker 0: Don't let me down. Look for more material and choose the best. Speaker 1: There is plenty of material, No. But it's hard to get it out. Speaker 2: The participants claim that it's Moscow Medley. However, they don't file a lawsuit against Cyber Berkowitz, and Ukraine state authorities haven't launched an investigation either. Speaker 3: Most certainly, the Ukrainian government officials, security officials like the the SBU, and police are involved. They would have to be. Why? Otherwise, it would be investigated. And it's not and it's not going to be. Speaker 2: Harvested organs aren't stored long. Transport must be immediate. If its storage period expires, The organ can't be used. The head of the Shumakov Federal Research denture of transplantology and artificial organs. Professor Sergei Gautier has his own definition of black market transplant surgeons. Europe has also taken an The Italian publication, Polittica Mente Correto, Posted an article by doctor Guilfredo De Linzey saying, organ procurement will soon be carried out by Global Rescue, which specializes in this type of supply and has a contract with the OSCE. Speaker 3: The problem is is the head All of the OSCE here is very political, and they don't bring anybody that's not supporting Ukraine. Now I caught the American OSCE rep actively working intelligence For Ukraine. Ukrainian intelligence officers coming around traveling with o s OSCE. Speaker 2: In his investigation, doctor Dylan Sey also writes about crematoria deployed in Ukraine. At the beginning of 2022, German defense minister Christine Lambrecht said they'd send field hospitals And mobile crematorium stations to help Ukraine. The news threw the border troops into a panic because everyone But the events of 2014 when the fighting in Southeast Ukraine whistling to a human organ's black market Targeting Europe, the US, and Israel. Traffic was controlled by SBU officers. The legendary Somalia battalion commander Mikhail Tolstikh, callsign GIVI, fought on the front lines from the start of war in Donbas. He saw what was happening on the Ukrainian side of the border in real time. OAM. He was killed by Ukrainian death squads in 2017. Speaker 1: Bull. Speaker 2: The Bandarists are Hitler's direct successors. And the Nazis had huge experience when it came to dealing, finally, with people. Today's neo Nazis wouldn't stand for just gassing people and burning them in ovens. 1st, they'd harvest organs and sell them at a profit. Ukrainian were trained in organ extraction by foreigners. Head of the DPR, Alexander Zakhachanka, assassinated by Ukrainian Nazis, left an article about terrible finds discovered in 2014 in the village of and mine number 22 called the communar.

@TheThe1776 - ꪻꫝể ꪻꫝể

3/6) Lots of intel came in about bodies of Men leaving Slavyansk Ukraine in 2014 being found without organs. The danger may be that a wounded Ukrainian army soldier won't be given necessary medical care because they are considered suitable donor material. So they decided to profit by selling the organs of their own dead soldiers, and those of orphans, through investigations within Donbass, almost 2,000 orphaned children were taken from children's homes. According to the WHO every year there are more than 10,000 black market human organs sales. Cost of Organs in Euros: ◦Whole Liver: €150,000 - €550,000 ◦Liver Section:€40,000 ◦Eye Cornea: €4,000 - €15,000 ◦Kidney: €18,000 - €250,000 ◦Bone Marrow: 1 gram = €20,000 ◦Heart: €160,000 - €300,000 ◦1 Lung: €60,000 2 Lungs: €200,000

Video Transcript AI Summary
According to the World Health Organization, the black market for human organs is thriving, with prices ranging from €4,000 to €550,000 depending on the organ. Corruption in Ukraine has created a new category of victims, including wounded soldiers and prisoners, who are seen as potential organ donors. The government of Ukraine has been accused of profiting from the sale of organs, even from their own dead soldiers and orphans. Orphanages in Odessa have been implicated in child trafficking, further highlighting the dark side of the organ trade. The fate of missing children from Donbas remains unknown, as Ukraine refuses to provide any information or adhere to international norms.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: According to the World Health Organization, every year, there are more than 10,000 black market human organ Prices vary depending on region. A whole liver costs from 150 to €550,000 apart from 40,000. A cornea is from 4 to 15,000, a kidney from 18 to 250,000. Bone marrow is sold by weight. 1 gram costs about 20,000. A heart costs from 160 to 300,000. Alung is 60,000. A pair is 200,000. Prices in euros. To conceal tracks, crematoria as well as other are used. Doctor Guilfredo de Linze also writes, the danger may be that a wounded Ukrainian army soldier Won't be given necessary medical care because they're considered suitable donor material. Speaker 1: Because of the the just the level of corruption in Ukraine and the level of crime, you're creating a whole new category of victim. If Anybody that's in the hospital, and whether it's Ukrainian military, whether it's a a prisoner in Ukrainian custody, Or it's people from, Donbas village because they wanna cleanse them out too. And their value is no longer that, Some of their lives, their value is what you can get on an open market for their body parts. And this is disgusting, but this is just part and parcel with what the government of Ukraine has become. Speaker 0: Once the richest of the Soviet Republics, Ukraine, turned into the poorest. Maidan started violently. The budget was plundered, and industry was destroyed. The most valuable land, the famous black Toil was sold. War was unleashed, and millions of people are forced to live abroad against their will. So they decided to profit by selling the organs of their own Dead soldiers and those of orphans. Children's home number 1, the oldest in Lugansk, is operational. Children of all ages live here. Victoria Machalova is the boss and main teacher at the children's home. The kids address her affectionately as mama Vika. Back in 2014, Citing the military danger, the Ukrainian authorities ordered the evacuation of all children who had lost their parents in Donbas. Speaker 1: With, the orphans that went to Odessa, the orphanage down there itself was run by American Diaspora. If you're looking at, say, 7 people that were responsible for the children, 5 of them were Americans. And these were people that were supporting the combat that property sector was doing in After that, a year later, in publications like The Huffington Post, They were reporting that the orphanages in Odessa, which were being supported by churches, which is this particular one, and These particular children were being used for child trafficking. Okay? So you have children missing there. The human trafficking quotient is where you're going to find the black Organ trade. Speaker 0: Yulia Nazarenka, children's ombudsman in the Lugansk People's Republic, is investigating cases of missing children. 2022 saw a repeat With children once again being evacuated from territories controlled by Kyiv. Hundreds of orphans from the Donetsk People's Republic were evacuated in the same manner. Anyone's guess how to find children who have essentially been abducted from Donbas. The most favorable outcome would be adoption, but there's a question mark on that. Question mark on that. Ukraine ignores all international legislative norms and refuses to say anything about the fate of children it has taken.

@TheThe1776 - ꪻꫝể ꪻꫝể

4/6) Doctors Without Borders and The Red Cross were sent to Ukraine and said to have dealings with Neo-Nazis. Doctors Without Borders activities was led by Bernard Kouchner, he was the Alpha and Omega of the organ trade in Ukraine. Carla Del Ponte a Former Prosecutor wrote in her book that the most shocking crimes she uncovered was Albanian trafficking human organs and she directly accused Kouchner and Doctors Without Borders of human organ trafficking. It's a full-fledged project organized by a major criminal group: partly from NATO, Western countries and NGOs like Doctors Without Borders. Just after the liberation of Vukovar, Serbian detachment found a whole mountain of unburied corpses with their abdominal cavities ripped open for the purpose of surgically removing organs. Also a doctor named Fedak sold 130 newborn babies organ to the U.S. and told the mothers in Ukraine that their babies had died. His assistant was Oleg Tyagnibok, a hospital attendant from the 'Svoboda" party in the Verkhovna Rada that's declared itself a Nazi party.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Doctors Without Borders and the Red Cross have faced allegations of involvement with Neo-Nazis and human organ trafficking in Ukraine and Kosovo. The head physician of a hospital in Lvov was accused of selling newborns' organs to the United States, while children were taken away from their parents under false pretenses. The Red Cross, during World War 2, allegedly ignored the suffering of Soviet prisoners while caring for US and European prisoners. In Kosovo, former prosecutor Carla Del Ponte accused Doctors Without Borders of human organ trafficking, but only after she had resigned. Serbian journalist Mjodrak Zarkovic believes law enforcement in his country hides the truth and only reveals it for personal gain. The contents of Del Ponte's book are known to Western intelligence services and peacekeeping organizations.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Cross and Doctors Without Borders who are said to have dealings with Neo Nazis in Ukraine. There have been allegations against Doctors Without Borders, of human organ trafficking in Kosovo, and it's thought that representatives of the organization were present when the children were evacuated. Children are also taken away from their parents under various pretexts. Selling children in Ukraine is anything but new. The investigation and found that the head physician of the Lvov Regional Clinical Hospital, Bogdan Fedak, sold newborns' organs to the United States, telling their mothers in Ukraine that their children had died. International Tarian organizations seem unconcerned about crimes being committed in Ukraine. Director of the Lugansk Children's Tuberculosis Hospital recalls. During World War 2, international humanitarian organizations, most notably the Red Cross, ignored the suffering of Soviet prisoners in the the same way. Soldiers, women, children were killed, burned, and horrible experiments were done. But the Red Cross allegedly kept silent. The same organization cared well for US and European prisoners. The president of the Red Cross, Carl J Burkart, officially supported the Nazis and was personally received by Hitler. It was through Red Cross channels that Adolf Eichmann, mastermind of the final solution to the Jewish question, maniacal doctor Josef Mengele, Klaus Babbe, nickname the Butcher of Lyon, and lesser known Nazis were able to escape justice. In 1999, Doctors Without Borders putting an appearance in Kosovo as well. Berneur Kuzhneur, doctor and diplomat, the ideologists behind the Doctors Without Borders organization established in 1971. Today, it's an international movement involving more than 63,000 people. Their activities are thought to be noble and humane. But in 2005, a book written by a former prosecutor of The Hague tribunal, Carla Del Ponte, was released Call the Hunt, Me and War Criminals. During her work in Kosovo. The prosecutor saw much. Albanians trafficking human organs was the most shocking crime she uncovered. Del Ponte directly accused Kushner and Doctors Without Borders of human organ trafficking. But the accusation only came out once Del Ponte had resigned as chief prosecutor. Speaker 1: While Carlo Dovonte was the head prosecutor of the country's bureau. He kept silent about it. He ignored all the evidence, Not only on this issue, but on many other issues. After that, when she is not on the that position anymore, when she can only benefit from telling the truth, for example, in her book. Speaker 0: Serbian journalist Mjodrak Zarkovic has no illusions about the actions of law enforcement in his country. Speaker 1: Court reveals some truth that they don't want. Afterwards, when they can earn money From hints, from allegations, from suspicions. Yeah. Then they do that. Speaker 0: The chairman of the Society of Missing Serbs in Kosovo, Simor Spasic, lost relatives when the West savagely carved up Yugoslavia. The contents of The Hunt, Me and the War Criminals are well known to both Western intelligence services and various peacekeeping organizations.

@TheThe1776 - ꪻꫝể ꪻꫝể

5/6) Carla Del Ponte: UN Officials in Kosovo, NATO Military and EU Representatives interfered with crimes committed by Albanians. She wrote “We were denied documents my advisors agree the investigation of NATO activities was impossible” Elizabeth Debru appeared in the confession of a former employee of the Security Service of Ukraine, who spoke about the scheme for the removal of organs from Ukrainian servicemen who died or were mortally wounded in Donbass. Elizabeth Debru a transplant surgeon was forcing doctors to remove organs without consent or did it herself and Everything was sent abroad. It was President of Georgia Mikhail Saakashvili's wife, Sandra Roelofs who was the mission's true organizer. She's linked with 'black' transplanting worldwide and was nicknamed ‘Sandra the Ripper' in Georgia because her name often appear in scandals related to illegal organ harvesting. Sandra Roelofs had a medical foundation that specializes in providing “help” to people. Many of these so-called organizations are hiding under the guise of a humanitarian mission. These organizations engaged in the deadly crime of organ trafficking to make BIG money!

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: Talked about a bike accident and something about the chest. Speaker 1: Mentioned dust, smoke, and oil. Speaker 2: Discussed a woman named Elizabeth de Bruk who is involved in some kind of illegal activities related to organ extraction. She had connections in Ukraine and Georgia. Speaker 3: Talked about the woman's criminal activities and her association with a person named Mikhail. Mentioned scandals related to organ trafficking. Speaker 1: Described how the woman's style of work changed and she started performing organ extractions without consent. Speaker 3: Mentioned that the woman had a foundation and worked in Ukraine. Speaker 1: Talked about the woman's involvement in illegal organ trafficking and how she would perform surgeries on injured individuals. Speaker 0: Mentioned someone named Vladimir and talked about organ trafficking in Ukraine. Speaker 2: Discussed how some individuals were taken to America or Romania after being injured and their organs were harvested. Speaker 4: Described the conditions created by the Ukrainian regime for illegal organ trafficking and experimentation. Speaker 0: Mentioned a medical center where people witnessed individuals involved in organ trafficking leaving the area.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Любил слил живу как у ло байк кучи если надо да s за у груди Speaker 1: пыль под ху активно дым. И масло Speaker 2: Прошла разведка и мы получали перехват в районе Артем появилась небе женщина элизабет де брюк мы поднимали информацию по поводу этой женщины мы узнали о том что она является очень авторитет транс черным транс вам на территории америки этот де брюк она еще объявила в 2014 году в районе то которое было временно контроль стороне север дон нет лис к св на Speaker 1: служба украины прошлого года был отправлен зона пола января с нами начала профессиональный транс забит де она полностью поменялась стиль нашей работы нашей группы заставлял вынимать урон без всякой согласия ранен сейчас она сама все делала сара за 7 10 минут могла вырезать пару почек ранен или обо бойца я не знаю платили семьям этих бедных жертв или платили вообще все отправлял за гордон большинство по было со сто 128 гор бригады эль часто звонили на мобильный у нее также был спутников телефоны роутер роутера я английский знаю хорошо и поэтому как бы слышал все что она говорила элис х и просили улучшить качество из извлечения органов постараемся стан отвечала она это была жена на михаила с страны ру она являлась реальным организатор нашей Speaker 3: фигура сан Ру о и в мире ее четко с деятельностью черных транс насколько я знаю в Грузии не прозвище сан пот потому что как раз очень часто ее фамилия фигурирует скандала, связанных с не из органов человеческих тел. Ру по моим данным существует фонд спец на ока помощи людям опять благо предлог. А вместе с ми михаил с длительное время работал на территорию украины. На Украине появилось ее так прямо называли груз команда. Их очень много приехала из Грузии и они заняли свои высокие должности в разных структура украинской власти от генеральной прокуратуры до министерства з здравоохранения александр К ш Это был близкий друг Ми михаила а он порядка полутора лет руководил министерство здравоохранения Украины. Ну груз было очень многое. Speaker 1: Всё поменялось после визита с в зону а то и я со его в к полу называл товар он говорил что мы этим помогаем больным Европы и сша ожидаю свежие человеческие все пошло дьявол путем тех ребят которые были за у въезд артём записали в про без вести получилось так что их просто убили никакие согласия не за и родственники ко ничего не платили это сан все звонила и звонила т выполнить заказ при города опасной она на почки и селе вырезала сознание от взрыва мины девочки двенадцати 12 лет ее родного отца. Даже помню фамилию владимир Для ш Speaker 0: кто-то на руку на органах их сыновей, как они говорят Украины, которых просто имели возможно тяжелые ранения вместо того чтобы оказать помощь, их просто в скрывал и разделы раздела извините, как на просто на столе, кому сердце, кому легкая кому почки. Speaker 3: Le people Speaker 2: К примеру во он не имеет шансов вы чтобы его не разбирать на части они его ко это сильно обе на таком состоянии его якобы возят на р в америку либо велико либо ру румынии больше при и там от его уже ничего не остается Speaker 4: для украинского украинского режима присутствия ин это сравним с божество, ему можно делать все что угодно. Поэтому они создавались все право условия в рамках которых они занимались из органов и проведение каких-то экспериментов опыта и сбор соответствующий материала, который нужен был под конкретную задачу. Speaker 0: Мир Speaker 4: Медицинский центр были эти люди, которые буквально за несколько дней до взять теле, они собрались и покинули эту территорию и люди это видели, они свидетельства о том, что эти люди там были. Которые находились располагались прямо в клиника, которые занимались какими-то своими опыта

@TheThe1776 - ꪻꫝể ꪻꫝể

6/6) The United States has many goals in Ukraine, but protecting the Ukrainian people is just LIES we were fed. This is No different than the LIES to deliver democracy to the people of Iraq, Libya etc. They have destroyed these people! If you are in the pro Ukraine camp, you should know the real reason we are in Ukraine was/is to sacrifice Ukraine to destroy Ukraine in order to bleed Russia. The country suffering most from the Ukraine/Russia war is Ukraine. Their people are dying in huge numbers! Their buildings are all being blown to bits! Their entire country is being destroyed! Asked yourself why does THE MEDIA want us to care about this war when we have no geopolitical interest in Ukraine, this is to push the Globalist Agenda which is to take out anyone “Putin” who stands in the way of furthering their Agenda! “After the demilitarization of Ukraine is done, a separate military tribunal will be held for 'black' transplant surgeons.” says Aleksandr Torba Distinguished Doctor, LPR Rector State Medical University. The list of the connected West crimes are long and sad and must be brought to an End! I use to have on my Drivers License that I am an organ donor, but I took it off. Knowing how the organ harvesting industry works through research, it’s best to state it in your Will than have it on your DL if you wish to donate your organs. #EndOrganTrafficking #EndSexTrafficking #EndMoneyLaunderingOfOurHardEarnedTaxDollars #NotAnotherRedCentToCorruptUkraine #IWillNotSupportAnyCandidateWhoSupportGivingMoneyToUkraine #PuttingOtherCountriesFirstMeansYouPutAmericaLast

Video Transcript AI Summary
Russian soldiers claim to have discovered a horrifying situation in Ukraine, where children as young as 27 are allegedly being raised in factory farm conditions. The attractive ones are said to be sold as sex slaves to elite pedophiles, while the rest are reportedly carved up for organ harvesting. A Russian officer emotionally describes the children being treated like livestock by their Ukrainian captors. The Kremlin accuses the Kiev regime of earning millions of dollars annually from this illegal trade. It is believed that wealthy pedophiles with connections are the main buyers, as these children lack official papers. However, it is also mentioned that Ukrainian organs are openly traded, and there are plans to sell Ukrainian migrants' organs to foreigners. The Donbas region is preparing a tribunal to condemn Ukrainian Neo-Nazism and its sponsors. The crimes of the collective West are highlighted and must be stopped.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Russian soldiers are claiming that they've made a hideous discovery inside Ukraine where they say that children between the ages of 27 are being raised in factory farm conditions before the attractive ones are sold as sex slaves to elite pedophiles. And those who don't find buyers are carved up like discarded waste as their organs are harvested and sold for use at European and Israeli transplant centers. In video footage from the front lines of the Russo Ukrainian war, A visibly emotional Russian officer describes children being treated as if they're livestock piglets or rabbits by their Ukrainian captors around the town of Bismarck, where the discovery of a commercial scale child organ harvesting factory was reported. There have previously been more disturbing claims about Ukrainian factory farm children made by Russia. According to the Kremlin, the Kiev regime has been earning 100 of 1,000,000 of dollars per year, by raising children in degrading factory farm conditions and selling them to the highest bidder on the international market. No questions asked. It is understood that most of the buyers are wealthy pedophiles with elite connections. As these children do not have identities or official papers, They are pedophiles' dream because in illegal sense Speaker 1: But Ukrainian organs are openly on Doctor de Lincey claims. In 2021, Bulgaria presented a plan to trade Ukrainian migrants' organs off to foreigners. The customer pays a minimum of $50,000 per kidney. The donor receives between $5,015,000. So it's not only Ukraine. And when it comes to exterminating people, either Ukrainian or Russian, the Donbas is preparing a tribunal And condemnation of Ukrainian Neo Nazism also implies condemnation of its sponsors. The collective West's crimes is long and sad And must be brought to an end.
MoatAwesome_
Posted - October 29, 2023 at 1:42 AM
Saved - November 1, 2023 at 5:58 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The conflict in Gaza is not just about the immediate violence. It is connected to larger geopolitical and economic factors. The new Silk Road, a trade route stretching from China to Syria, is seen as a rival by the US and Israel. They aim to control gas reserves and pipelines, cutting off Russian and Iranian gas to Europe. Israel's gas field, Leviathan, becomes crucial. The US and Israel have funded the war in Syria, gaining control over oil fields and ports. Now, Israel seeks to exploit gas reserves and establish an economic corridor. The ongoing violence in Gaza is part of a larger struggle for control and dominance in the region.

@MoatAwesome_ - المعتصم بالله 𓋔

Thread No.7 This Thread is addressed to non-Arab Twitter users. I don't think people have any idea what's really happening in Gaza and why it is happening. So please give us some time to clarify things for you. https://t.co/ciCC2TBHR4

@MoatAwesome_ - المعتصم بالله 𓋔

A few weeks ago, right before this war in Gaza ignites , Netanyahu goes to the United Nations General Assembly and he holds up this map and declares his plan for a new Middle East. https://t.co/BFxqRvBqfC

@MoatAwesome_ - المعتصم بالله 𓋔

And people are going, what is this stupid line this guy's drawing with a red marker? it is an economic corridor that stretches all the way from India to the United Arab Emirates into Saudi Arabia, into Jordan, Israel, and then finally to the entire European continent. https://t.co/QZY9djTkcS

@MoatAwesome_ - المعتصم بالله 𓋔

I mean, the US at this point, their influence starting to fade, seeing the relevance of the $ recede after they stole $300B from Russia you have all these spooks in Washington and Tel Aviv running around desperately trying to counter bricks and counter China's new Silk Road. https://t.co/yCOHAsW4e6

@MoatAwesome_ - المعتصم بالله 𓋔

And this is their answer. This is a rival to the new Silk Road. Remember, the ancient Silk Road is the largest, most important trade route in human history. This thing is enormous. It stretches all the way from China to Syria to the Mediterranean Sea. https://t.co/ufpZgt6xsU

@MoatAwesome_ - المعتصم بالله 𓋔

The Chinese know how important this thing is, and they want to revive it. It is the future of world economics, trade and politics. Within the span of a few weeks, iran and Iraq have signed a railway deal. https://t.co/EgFWyUTaCQ

@MoatAwesome_ - المعتصم بالله 𓋔

So now you have a rail link for the new Silk Road. And President Assad of Syria N.B 📒(War criminal) , is now visiting China, the world's largest economy, and signing a strategic partnership. This is pivotal. https://t.co/eA9STvtLPD

@MoatAwesome_ - المعتصم بالله 𓋔

So now the new Silk Road has rail access all the way to the Mediterranean Sea through Sirius port in Latakia. So not just land, but maritime trade. This is crucial. And as enormous and important as all of this is, this is just one aspect. (You still have the gas.) https://t.co/l4AY6qU8t7

@MoatAwesome_ - المعتصم بالله 𓋔

How can we talk about the Middle East without talking about gas and oil? When the US instigated the Maidan coup in 2014, that wasn't just about NATO expansion and encirclement of Russia. https://t.co/vluiqIFycj

@MoatAwesome_ - المعتصم بالله 𓋔

This was about surrounding, controlling and cutting off Russian gas to Europe. Russia is the country with the largest proven reserves of natural gas. Control Ukraine, and you control the pipelines that feed and supply Russian gas to Europe. https://t.co/pTyDSqWUtq

@MoatAwesome_ - المعتصم بالله 𓋔

For decades, you've had US politicians, Republican and Democrat, every administration, openly saying on camera, we don't want NS. There will be we there will be no longer a NS too. We will bring an end to it. You want to have pipelines that don't go through Ukraine and Russia. https://t.co/NJR1jsqgXw

@MoatAwesome_ - المعتصم بالله 𓋔

For years, we've tried to get the Europeans to be interested in different pipeline routes. It's time to do that. You want to depend more on the North American energy platform, the tremendous bounty of oil and gas that we're finding in North America. https://t.co/KRUyrHx1fr

@MoatAwesome_ - المعتصم بالله 𓋔

Nord stream, one and two are blown up. I mean, this is without question the most egregious the largest terrorist attack on European infrastructure in modern history. There are only three countries on this planet that can pull this off. They are Russia, Britain and the US. https://t.co/9ZHkavW6Ku

@MoatAwesome_ - المعتصم بالله 𓋔

let me tell you, it was not Russia. You combine that with the sanctioned packages from the European Union banning Russian oil and gas, I mean, talk about shooting yourself in the foot. https://t.co/AlLqJrpZPX

@MoatAwesome_ - المعتصم بالله 𓋔

So now there's no more Russian gas coming into Europe. And just like that, the United States have achieved a long standing foreign policy objective. https://t.co/TWYlK0OM97

@MoatAwesome_ - المعتصم بالله 𓋔

Now, the only other country with enormous gas reserves, the second largest in the world, is Iran. Iran signed the nuclear deal in 2015 and 2016. They're complying in every way imaginable. The IAEA at the UN cannot be happier. And then the United States https://t.co/Xzc1HyrEtp

@MoatAwesome_ - المعتصم بالله 𓋔

And then the United States, the guys who orchestrated the whole deal, go back on their word and they rip it up, just like that and reimpose sanctions on Iran. So now Iran is barred from selling its oil and gas to Europe and others. https://t.co/3SBlAtrR6Q

@MoatAwesome_ - المعتصم بالله 𓋔

So Russia and Iran, the two countries with the largest gas reserves, are out of the picture. Then Israel all of a sudden proposed themselves as a solution to the European Union's gas shortages. Take our trilateral energy, for example, that we closed in June with Egypt and Israel. https://t.co/Qn7yt3gIRP

@MoatAwesome_ - المعتصم بالله 𓋔

In 2010, they conduct a geological survey and find this monstrous giant gas field in the Middle East. It's called the Leviathan, and it's in the Mediterranean Sea on the Levantine basin. That means it's right off the coast of Palestine , Lebanon and Syria. https://t.co/HzQyLUE4X3

@MoatAwesome_ - المعتصم بالله 𓋔

Syria initially declines, offers over its gas reserves, and simultaneously refuses to lay pipes for a Qatari gas project. What a coincidence. Barely a year later, war breaks out in Syria. And who's funding it? Israel and the US are just some of the parties funding and running. https://t.co/FSETbjerTi

@MoatAwesome_ - المعتصم بالله 𓋔

this war to overthrow the government in Damascus. Today, the United States control one third of Syria. They control all of Syria's oil fields. And Israel is bombing Syria's most vital port, Latakia, on a regular basis. https://t.co/eDRvMT5gAR

@MoatAwesome_ - المعتصم بالله 𓋔

So they're cutting off all the oil revenue and destroying crippling any maritime activity, such as trade, such as gas exploration. Another major port on the Levantine coast is in Beirut, which mysteriously explodes in 2020. https://t.co/Bii3iL0MSS

@MoatAwesome_ - المعتصم بالله 𓋔

And so Israel, proposing itself as a solution to Europe's gas shortages, shows up with an FPSO, this enormous gas extraction vessel, and tries sealing gas from Lebanon's Karish gas field. https://t.co/GbJ1OFSD0q

@MoatAwesome_ - المعتصم بالله 𓋔

And this reignites a huge maritime border dispute. And Israel has to go and beg the United States to solve this diplomatically because Hazballah said, if you steal one cubic inch of our gas, we will fire our missiles on your ship. Now we come to Gaza. https://t.co/HVUmbXY2MK

@MoatAwesome_ - المعتصم بالله 𓋔

Gaza is also a concentration camp run by the Israelis and it's been under siege , under naval blockade since 2007. I mean you can't even fish properly, let alone extract gas. And so now the Lebanese, the Syrian, thePalestinian ports, they're all out of action. https://t.co/wniUWIq6BH

@MoatAwesome_ - المعتصم بالله 𓋔

And the only working port left in coast is the Israeli port on Haifa. I mean how convenient. This makes Israel the only one able to explore gas and implement an economic corridor like the one that Netanyahu held up at the UN. https://t.co/BtxR9aFrRR

@MoatAwesome_ - المعتصم بالله 𓋔

So in other words, Israel and the United States together, killed off all the competition, stole their goods and cornered the market.

@MoatAwesome_ - المعتصم بالله 𓋔

But as winter is approaching, israel desperately need to get that gas for Europe. But there's no stability, there can never be stability in the region without solving the Palestinian question. And so when Netanyahu shows up at the UN with his brilliant know, the Israelis thought https://t.co/blbYlgyt6a

@MoatAwesome_ - المعتصم بالله 𓋔

oh, it's a done know, they'll just get Saudi Arabia to normalize ties and thereby extinguish the Palestinian issue once and for all. https://t.co/Simd18OCQj

@MoatAwesome_ - المعتصم بالله 𓋔

And that is precisely why they are in Gaza, slaughtering Palestinians like crazy, like they're in berserker know, Israel has bombed Gaza before, but this surpasses anything we've ever seen which is truly saying something.

@MoatAwesome_ - المعتصم بالله 𓋔

I mean this is know, calling people human animals and massacring them. Israel is just hoping the Palestinians will run away in fear into the desert. They've literally said this, they want to put them in the desert. https://t.co/8KrfexrOKU

@MoatAwesome_ - المعتصم بالله 𓋔

They want people in Gaza to go to the Sinai Desert and push the people in the West Bank into Jordan. This is genocide and ethnic cleansing without question. https://t.co/WZMvKLGUbv

@MoatAwesome_ - المعتصم بالله 𓋔

But it also has economic and geopolitical implications. Hamas and the collective resistance when they found out about Israel's plan and Saudi Arabia's wishes to normalize ties with Israel, which would destroy any hope of a Palestinian state, I mean this forced their hand. https://t.co/032udh0oAN

@MoatAwesome_ - المعتصم بالله 𓋔

It became clear they needed to act and respond immediately, lest Palestine be lost forever. https://t.co/2LevmZOJ3v

@MoatAwesome_ - المعتصم بالله 𓋔

For Palestinians, this is and always has been a matter of life and death. To be or not to be. Either the resistance axis and the global south expel the American and Israeli colonizers from the Middle East, or Israel and the United States will continue occupying the region, https://t.co/3wkzRLVHn0

@MoatAwesome_ - المعتصم بالله 𓋔

choking off the new Silk Road, plundering Syria's oil and keeping Russian, Iranian and Arab gas cut off from the world market. This is a decisive moment, and not just for Palestine, because the victors will end up drawing the new map of the world to come. https://t.co/PGz7ty3dCE

@MoatAwesome_ - المعتصم بالله 𓋔

All rights reserved and all effort is attributed to the creator of the original content Richard Medhurst.

@MoatAwesome_ - المعتصم بالله 𓋔

Thread No.7 Done . Free palestine. Free palestine. Free palestine. https://t.co/yKQBtT3KLm

_______showband
Posted - December 22, 2023 at 3:43 PM
Saved - December 22, 2023 at 5:45 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Israel's actions in the Middle East have contributed to the European refugee crisis. They have used Jewish-run NGOs and refugee resettlement agencies to empty the Middle East of potential opponents. Israel has a long history of seeking refugee resettlement outside its borders, with Europe being a major destination. The US and Israel's interventions in the Middle East have directly led to the influx of refugees into Europe. Jewish organizations, such as IsraAID, have played a significant role in facilitating the movement and resettlement of refugees in Europe. The focus should be on long-term integration of refugee populations to address the issue effectively.

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

In Depth: How Israel Created the European Refugee Crisis The world has looked on with shock and horror at the Jewish bombardment of innocent civilians in Palestine over the last few days. Apparently even Israel thinks their actions are indefensible, since on May 15th, (1/116)

@poxesfoxes - Pox Populi

@HankHeil @_______showband You were saying? https://t.co/cenSkMy5OY

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) destroyed a building housing the Associated Press (AP) and other media outlets in Gaza with the intention of stopping images of Palestinian suffering from reaching the rest of the world. Following the attack on the AP, (2/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

Israel stepped up its bombing of civilian targets, killing dozens of Palestinians with airstrikes on populated streets.But the Zionist strategy entails more than simply brutally punishing Palestinians and other Arab populations that stand up to them. (3/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

They also utilize an extensive network of Jewish-run NGOs and refugee resettlement agencies in the West to empty the Middle-East of potential opponents.Since the creation of the Jewish state in 1948, (4/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

refugee resettlement outside its borders has always been a major strategic goal. A 2013 article from the Israeli newspaper Haaretz revealed secret archival documents showing that from the very beginning, (5/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

Zionist Jews saw Europe as the destination of choice for the Arabs they had http://displaced.In the first half of the 1960s, the Foreign Ministry continued to examine plans to encourage the emigration of Arab refugees from the Middle East to Europe, (6/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

particularly to France and Germany. One option that was considered was to find them jobs in Germany, which was then in dire need of working hands. During 1962, Israeli officials examined the possibility of finding employment for Palestinian refugee laborers in Germany, (7/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

Austria and Switzerland. The initial checks done for this plan, known as “Operation Worker,” and the correspondence involved, were kept completely under wraps. (8/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

This plan was eventually tabled since then Israeli Prime Minister Golda Meier feared it could generate a huge backlash from the German people. In the 1960s Israel was considerably less powerful and secure than it is today, (9/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

so such bold plans had to be put on hold until later. But it demonstrates that foisting the Arabs on Europe as a form of racial revenge was on the minds of the Jews in Israel from the very beginning.Demographics have always been at the forefront of Israeli policy, (10/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

and their control over Western governments has long been used to ensure that Jews remain a demographic majority on their newly seized territory. (11/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

Meier leveraged Jewish power in Washington to scuttle a 1961 plan spearheaded by President Kennedy to offer resettlement in Israel to the then 1.1 million Palestinian refugees displaced by the 1948 war. In late 1961, in the wake of President Kennedy’s initiative, Dr. (12/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

Joseph Johnson, from the Carnegie Endowment, was appointed a special representative to tackle the problem and to work with the parties involved to come up with a solution. (13/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

The plan he devised − to distribute questionnaires to the Palestinian refugees and permit those who wished to return to Israel, subject to security considerations − stirred deep fears in Jerusalem.Meir, who was appalled by the idea, (14/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

wielded all the influence at her command in Washington in order to ensure that the plan met a quick death.The Clean BreakThe entire history of the Arab-Israeli conflict is beyond the scope of this article, (15/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

but the roots of the current refugee invasion can be traced back to the year 1996 when the so-called “neconservative” movement was formalized with the publication of the now infamous memo “A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm” by several Jewish foreign (16/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

policy analysts at the Israeli Institute for Advanced Strategic and Political Studies in Washington DC. The authors included well-known Jewish warmonger Richard Perle, (17/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

and the Jew David Wurmser who would go on to be the Middle-East policy adviser to Vice President Dick Cheney during the George W. Bush administration. (18/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

The “clean break” memo recommended that Israel break with its old strategy of using the United States simply for defensive military aid and diplomatic cover, and instead start an aggressive war against the entire Arab world and Iran using the US military as a proxy army. (19/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

In particular it recommended taking out Iraq and Syria.Israel can shape its strategic environment, in cooperation with Turkey and Jordan, by weakening, containing, and even rolling back Syria. (20/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

This effort can focus on removing Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq — an important Israeli strategic objective in its own right — as a means of foiling Syria’s regional ambitions.A year later, in 1997, (21/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

Jewish-Zionist “intellectuals” William Kristol and Robert Kagan set up the now infamous Project for the New American Century (PNAC) which recommended the United States engage in a massive military buildup to be used for pushing “democracy” around the world. (22/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

Of the 25 signatories to PNAC’s statement of principles, 15 were Jewish and ten served in the George W. Bush administration, including Deputy Secretary of Defense, Paul Wolfowitz. Richard Perle has also served as chairman of PNAC. (23/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

PNAC’s focus was on “regime change” in Iraq, though they acknowledged that without some “catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor” this would be difficult to sell to the American people. That event came on 9/11, (24/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

and the US subsequently invaded Afghanistan in 2001 and Iraq in 2003 at the behest of the Jewish-Zionist warmongers in the Bush administration.Endless WarAccording to a 2006 interview with retired General Wesley Clark, (25/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

the decision to invade Iraq was made two weeks after 9/11, and there were even more ambitious plans in the works to invade “seven countries in five years.” Playing into popular conspiracy theories, Clark claimed this strategy was somehow connected to oil. (26/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

He failed to mention that the plan he described had already been laid out in the “clean break” memo and PNAC policy papers written by various Jewish-Zionist officials in the Bush administration, (27/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

all of which placed the issue of Israel’s security significantly ahead of oil issues. In fact, oil politics were mainly viewed as an impediment to Israel’s interests due to the strategic leverage oil has offered to Arab countries and Iran. (28/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

The issue of oil has always been used to distract Americans from the real reason for their government’s seemingly insane foreign policy in the Middle-East. If the US simply wanted secure access to oil, (29/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

the last thing it would do would be to start wars and topple governments, thereby creating significant disruptions to world oil markets. Oil is often cited as the motivation for America’s longstanding policy of support for the barbaric regime in Saudi Arabia, (30/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

making a farce of its claims to care about human rights and democracy. But with the Iraq War, the US showed it is more than willing to take out major oil producing states if Israel requires it. (31/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

The longstanding friendly relationship between Saudi Arabia and Israel is a far better explanation for the US stance towards that country. In 2011, civil wars broke out in Syria and Libya, both of which were fomented by the US acting on behalf of Israel. (32/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

The nauseating refrain of “supporting democracy” has been trotted out by the US for years as a threadbare excuse to arm and fund terrorist militias in Syria to try to remove Syrian President Bashar Assad from power, (33/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

while pretending to fight against the “Islamic State in Iraq and Syria” (ISIS) terrorist group. (34/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

A 2012 email published by Wikileaks from current Biden administration National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan to then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton clearly outlined the US position regarding Islamist terrorist groups. (35/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

Sullivan made the astounding statement that Al Quaeda, who the US claims perpetrated the 9/11 attacks that killed 3,000 Americans, “is on our side in Syria.”The “last item” Sullivan mentions, (36/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

refers to a Reuters report that says this: AL-ZAWAHIRI URGES MUSLIM SUPPORT FOR OPPOSITIONAl-Qaida leader al-Zawahiri called on Muslims in Turkey and the Middle East to aid rebel forces in their fight against supporters of Syrian President Asad in an interne[sic] video (37/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

recording. Al-Zawahiri also urged the Syrian people not to rely on the AL, Turkey, or the United States for assistance. (38/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

Sullivan’s email puts the lie to all public statements from Washington that the purpose of intervention in Syria is to fight against radical Sunni terrorist groups. (39/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

The fact that the Jewish-owned US media completely ignored this earth shattering revelation is a testament to its bias and corruption.The US has also engaged in numerous bombings of Syria over the years, (40/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

usually at times when the Assad government was poised to win a major battle and take back a chunk of its rightful territory. The continued presence of US troops and mercenaries in Syria, along with funding for Islamist rebel groups and occasional bombing, (41/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

is meant to prevent Assad from retaking his country. If the US really wanted ISIS defeated, the obvious strategy would be to leave Assad alone to crush them with the assistance of Russia and Iran. (42/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

This policy would also have the benefit of actually being popular with American citizens, a fact that was cynically exploited by President Trump to win election in 2016.For its part, (43/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

Israel has provided medical aid to ISIS and other terrorists fighting Assad and in 2019 Israeli military official Gadi Eisenkot publicly admitted that Israel had been arming and paying monthly salaries to ISIS terrorists. In 2011 Libyan President Col. (44/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

Muammar Quadafi was murdered by US backed terrorists after an eight month civil war. That the US was behind this assassination is well known and not controversial. In her role as Secretary of State, (45/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

Hillary Clinton unabashedly celebrated Quadafi’s murder during a 2011 television interview in which she exclaimed with psychotic glee “We came. We Saw. He died.”Quadafi understood that Israel was behind the Western aggression against his country, (46/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

and attempted to save himself and his government by bypassing the US and appealing directly to Israel and influential American Jews. According to Israeli sources, (47/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

in 2011 he sought to plead his case to Israel and to the Israel lobby which controls foreign policy in the US. (48/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

…when the Libyan regime was teetering on the brink – due to the uprising and the damage from the UN-imposed Lockerbie sanctions first implemented in 1992 – she added, “Gaddafi desperately made extraordinary overtures to the Jewish lobby in the US and to Israel as well. (49/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

”While the Jewish-owned media in the US exclusively focused on alleged “human rights abuses” by Quadafi as the motivation for removing him from power, Israeli strategists have been more honest and realistic. Writing in 2016, Dr. Rafael Olek, (50/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

a strategic analyst for the Begin–Sadat Center for Strategic Studies in Israel, reiterated Israel’s commitment to its long term strategic goal of removing all oppositional governments no matter the human cost.With regard to the global aspect, (51/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

the Libyan issue raises several concerns. Firstly, there are question marks regarding the actual ability to enforce regimes of non-proliferation of weapons of mass destruction on rogue states. Secondly, (52/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

one may ask: would it be better to accept the stable regime of tyrants such as Gaddafi and Saddam Hussein, Assad and the Ayatollah regime in Iran, or should those tyrants be toppled despite the ensuing process where their countries disintegrate, (53/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

which involves severe violence? As much as we may regret the situation in Syria and Iraq, it seems, at least from the Israeli perspective, that the second option is preferable – it is easier to confine and the situation may stabilize eventually. (54/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

Despite the misery and death throughout the Middle-East caused by the Israeli strategy of “regime change,” Israel sees no reason to back off this policy. And why would it? Israel itself has remained remarkably secure throughout the chaos, (55/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

and has even increased its power and improved its diplomatic position.The Refugee CrisisIsrael’s wars and interventions in the Middle-East, working through its US proxy, (56/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

were the direct catalyst for the European refugee crisis which boiled over in 2015 and has lead to violence, terrorism, rape and political repression against native Europeans. The two major points of entry for refugees and migrants to Europe are Greece and Italy. (57/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

The US/Israeli orchestrated fall of Qaddafi in 2011 opened up a major route for refugees from the Middle-East and Africa to flow into Europe. According to the Washington Post 400, (58/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

000 migrants from the Middle-East and Africa flowed into Italy from Libya between 2014 and 2017 due to the overthrow of Qaddafi.Since the collapse of Moammar Gaddafi’s regime in Libya, the number of migrants crossing the Mediterranean has soared, (59/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

as people have taken advantage of a vacuum of authority to set sail from the country’s northern coast. A network of human smugglers who facilitate the traffic has expanded from the tip of North Africa down to countries such as Niger and Sudan. (60/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

Contacts for smugglers circulate on Facebook and WhatsApp in major cities across Africa. Since 2014, more than 400,000 migrants and refugees have crossed the Mediterranean from Libya to Italy. (61/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

This was a reversal of what had been a successful joint effort between Qaddafi and Europe to block migrants from reaching European shores. In 2004, Qaddafi began offering to control refugee flows as an incentive for normalization agreements with European states. (62/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

In 2010 he prophetically stated that Europe would turn black without his assistance.Back to 2004, Qaddafi began making deals with individual European states to control the tide of migrants. In August 2010, he visited his friend Silvio Berlusconi, (63/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

then president of Italy, in Rome and said Europe would turn “black” without his help.“Tomorrow Europe might no longer be European, and even black, as there are millions who want to come in,” Qaddafi said. (64/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

“What will be the reaction of the white and Christian Europeans faced with this influx of starving and ignorant Africans … we don’t know if Europe will remain an advanced and united continent or if it will be destroyed, as happened with the barbarian invasions. (65/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

”These deals were a success. With the help of Qaddafi, the flow of migrants and refugees into Italy was drastically cut in 2009. In June 2009, (66/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

he signed a “friendship” agreement with Italy that involved joint naval patrols against migrants and Italy handing over migrants captured en route to Europe to Libya, no questions asked. (67/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

The number of Africans caught trying to illegally enter Italy fell by more than 75 percent that year.This mutually beneficial arrangement between Italy and Libya was destroyed by Israel and the US, resulting in Quadafi’s morbid prediction coming true in 2015. (68/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

The Italian government has attempted to revive agreements with Libya in recent years to stem the tide of migrants. These attempts have been met with legal challenges. (69/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

The British NGO Global Legal Action Network (GLAN) filed a suit against Italy in the European Court in 2017, alleging human rights abuses. GLAN’s legal adviser is Itammar Mann, a Jewish Israeli legal professor that teaches “refugee law” in Haifa, Israel. (70/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

There are about 6.6 million refugees from the Syrian civil war worldwide, one million of which are in Europe. The peak years for refugee arrival in Europe were 2015-2017 when about 900,000 Syrians entered, mainly through Greece. (71/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

The displacement of the Syrian people serves a strategic goal for Israel by denying the Assad government of both human capital and potential recruits for its military. According to Pew Research, a disproportionate number of refugees in Europe are military aged men. (72/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

IsraAID workers help to land a migrant boat in Greece.Israel and Jewish-run NGOs in the West are the main facilitators of the movement and resettlement of Syrian, Iranian, Iraqi and Afghani refugees in Europe. (73/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

All four countries have been destabilized through war and sanctions by Israel and the US. IsraAID, the Israeli refugee agency, has operated the refugee centers on the Greek Island of Lesbos since 2015. (74/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

Greek refugee aid centers are mainly operated by Israelis; in Lesbos there is an Israeli school for Syrian, Iranian, Iraqi and Afghan refugees; and it is all part of a joint plan to revolutionize the concept of ‘Tikkun Olam’ and Jewish volunteering around the world. (75/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

Israeli reporter Liad Osmo quoted a Syrian refugee identified as “H., aged 20, from Aleppo” arriving on Lesbos in 2019.“My whole life, all through my childhood in Syrian schools, I was taught that the Israelis are the enemy, (76/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

and then the first thing I see when I approach the Greek coast is the Star of David on the shirts of Israelis who reach out and place me on the ground. (77/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

”Osmo goes on to say that the program to resettle refugees in Western countries will reach all over the world and involve several other Jewish agencies. This is made possible by a $66 million dollar investment from the State of Israel. (78/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

The concept of working to build a better world is now being adopted by a major Jewish organization in conjunction with the State of Israel…The Jewish Agency is now working with the Mosaic United organization on a joint project that is expected to dramatically increase (79/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

the number of young Jews involved in giving back to their local community. To American Jews, this is known as Tikkun Olam – or healing the world. This Jewish concept became a central tenet among the fourth generation descendants of Jewish immigrants to the United States. (80/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

The projects will be implemented all over the world – from Puerto Rico and Greece to Nepal, Mexico, India and Ethiopia through organizations such as IsraAID, Project TEN, Tevel B’Tzedek and more…“For the most part, (81/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

the only thing that makes Jewish students around the world think about their Jewish identity is when there is a BDS (the anti-Israel boycott, divestment and sanctions movement) demonstration on campus, or an anti-Semitic event somewhere around the world, (82/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

” says Rabbi Benji Levy, CEO of Mosaic United. “Such incidents distance them from the desire to be Jewish or associated with Israel.”Levy says the project was adopted by the Israeli government several years ago, under the auspices of the Ministry of Diaspora Affairs. (83/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

“The government will invest $66 million, which is a third of the budget,” he says.Rabbi Benji Levy welcomes Israel’s enemies to the Greek island of Lesbos.Germany has taken on far more refugees of Jewish conflicts than any other European state. (84/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

Against the will of the German people, Angela Merkel famously promised to take in 500,000 refugees per year in 2015. Israel’s footprint can be felt in Germany as well, where Israeli NGOs provide Arabic speakers with language lessons and find them work opportunities. (85/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

In 2018 Merkel presented IsraAID with an award for their work on integrating Arabic speakers into Germany. On their website, IsraAID boasts of the extensive programs they have set up in Germany to facilitate the integration of refugees, (86/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

while leaving out any mention of the Jewish state’s responsibility for the crisis in the first place.IsraAID has been operating in Germany since 2015, when one million asylum seekers and refugees reached the country, (87/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

most fleeing the brutality of the Syrian civil war and the threat of ISIS in Iraq and Syria… IsraAID Germany’s programs include refugee youth leadership groups, post-trauma psychosocial support for children using expressive arts therapy, (88/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

and a special program supporting survivors of the Yazidi genocide. IsraAID’s team in Germany is a multicultural mosaic of Arabic-, Hebrew-, German- and English-speaking psychologists, social workers, art therapists and educators. (89/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

They utilize their international experience and intercultural approach to promote the sustainable well-being and integration of refugees in Germany.…IsraAID’s global response includes sustainable programs to build resilience, provide education, (90/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

combat gender-based violence, advance child protection, improve sanitation and offer livelihood opportunities. Since the height of the Syrian refugee crisis in 2015, IsraAID has provided medical, psychosocial and educational support to over 100, (91/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

000 refugees in Greece and Germany alone.Many refugees fleeing war and persecution in Afghanistan, Iran, Iraq, and Syria for countries like Germany enter Europe through Greece. In Lesbos, (92/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

the Greek island where many refugees first arrive after a harrowing sea journey from Turkey, IsraAID provides medical care to new arrivals on the shoreline and operates the School of Peace, the only institution offering mother-tongue education in Arabic, Congolese French, (93/116

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

Farsi and Kurdish, with more than 200 students every week.…Through our work with IsraAID, we have seen the power and potential of the refugees we work with as they write a new story for themselves and their communities. It is a story of learning new languages, (94/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

of adjusting to new surroundings. It is 500 people, Arabic-, Kurdish-, Farsi- and French-speaking Muslims and Christians, celebrating Eid-al-Fitr in a Greek school run by an Israeli humanitarian aid organization. (95/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

Israel gushes with humanitarian rhetoric when talking about hosting an Eid-al-Fitr celebration in Europe for Muslims fleeing Zionist wars, but such a celebration is totally unthinkable in Israel. (96/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

In 2021 the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) spent Eid-al-Fitr bombing Palestinian civilians in Gaza. The previous day, fanatical Jews were recorded dancing in Jerusalem because they thought one of Islam’s holiest mosques was on fire. (97/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

Any nervousness expressed by Jews over the influx of foreigners into Europe has revolved solely around the potential negative impact on European Jews. The negative impact on native Europeans is only considered through the danger, from the Jewish perspective, (98/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

of galvanizing nationalist opposition. In a paper for the liberal Brookings Institution in 2015 Daniel Byman, professor of Jewish Civilization at Georgetown University in Washington DC, (99/116)

@_______showband - 𝐸𝐵

said that the solution to this problem was long term integration of the refugee populations in Europe.If the refugees are treated as a short-term humanitarian problem rather than as a long-term integration challenge, then we are likely to see this problem worsen. (100/116)

Megatron_ron
Posted - January 15, 2024 at 11:48 AM
Saved - January 15, 2024 at 4:59 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
American troops are reportedly being deployed to Iraq and Syria to fight against ISIS, according to CBS. However, Megatron claims that these bases are considered illegal by both countries and accuses the US of extracting oil from Syria unlawfully.

@Megatron_ron - Megatron

BREAKING: ⚡ 🇺🇸 American network CBS: "A new batch of American troops is preparing to head to both Iraq and Syria under the pretext of fighting ISIS." Megatron: Both Syria and Iraq officially call these bases illegal, hence the US occupation of these countries. The US illegally extracts tons of oil from Syria every year. (photo illustrative) t.me/megatron_ron

21WIRE
Posted - February 4, 2024 at 2:03 AM
Saved - February 4, 2024 at 12:27 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The US government and mainstream media are being dishonest about the recent US strikes in Iraq and Syria. Iraq and Syria want the US out of their countries, and Iran is their ally but not their proxy. The US's actions have further antagonized sovereign states and non-state actors in the region who want the US to leave the Middle East. This move by Biden will only accelerate the process of pushing the US out of their remaining exposed positions.

@21WIRE - Patrick Henningsen

EXPLAINER: TRUTH ABOUT THE LATEST U.S. STRIKES ON IRAQ & SYRIA: As usual, US government and MSM are lying about just about everything surrounding the 3 United States soldiers killed at “Tower 22” and supposed “Iranian aggression”. Iraq and Syria want the U.S. occupiers out of their countries, simply put. #Iran is their ally, but they are not Iran’s proxies. Watch this video and you will know and understand more than 99% of people in America and its allied countries. Watch & Share:

Video Transcript AI Summary
The recent US military escalation in the Middle East is based on a lie, according to the speaker. The claim is that Iranian-backed forces killed three US soldiers in Jordan. The speaker argues that the US has been illegally occupying 25% of Syria's territory since 2017 to control oil fields and resources, while imposing sanctions on Syria. The speaker also claims that ISIS only exists in areas where the US military is present, and that the US attacks against Iraqi militias have allowed ISIS to mount attacks. The speaker criticizes the US presence in Iraq and Syria, stating that the Iraqi parliament has condemned it. The lies told by the US are said to cover up reality, such as NATO's expansion and Israel's actions in Gaza. The speaker concludes by stating that the US is stealing Syrian oil and using the funds for undisclosed purposes.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: A few words about the recent US military escalation in the Middle East. Like all US military actions, this one relies on a lie in order to give it the pretense of legitimacy. The claim by Washington is that Iranian backed forces or Iranian proxies have killed 3 US soldiers in Jordan in a place called tower 22. Now this is significant where the location is because had it been a few meters In the Syrian territory, this would have had huge legal implications for the United States. It also meant that the United States would not have been able to retaliate in the broad fashion that it has done. Because the fact is the United States has been illegally occupying 25% of Syria's territory since 2017. For no reason at all well, there is a good reason why they're there. They're there to squat the Syrian oil fields in and around the Deir ez Zor area and to keep Syria from having access to its oil, its gas, also its agriculture, as well, all of its resources, while simultaneously the United States and the EU apply vicious sanctions like a total embargo on the country of Syria. So this is all part of the maximum pressure strangulation of Syria, but there's another reason why the United States is there and specifically in the area of Al Tanf, on the border there with Jordan. This magically is where ISIS loiters and hangs out. And what's amazing is that ISIS doesn't exist in any territory controlled by the Syrian government. ISIS only exists and is allowed to exist in areas where the United States military are. And if you look at after these US attacks, So these cruise missiles, these salvos, the bombing that was done over the last 48 hours by the United States and its coalition of the willing. What's interesting is that ISIS took advantage of this and mounted attacks against Iraqi militias. Those resistance forces, these Iraqi resistance militias, these aren't just ragtag militias. These are part of the people's mobilization units or the Hashd al Shaabi. These fall under the Iraqi Ministry of Defense. They were deputized during the rise of ISIS to fight ISIS. Those forces are there in the Iraqi and Syria border regions in order to protect The Iraqi people against the emergence of ISIS. And ISIS is still on the loose in these areas where the United States appears to be providing them some level of cover or level of protection. It's quite obvious after US strikes against these Iraqi militia facilities that ISIS then took advantage of that. And the joke is if ISIS had an air force, it would be the United States and Israel. And this Time and time again, we see examples of this. This happened many times in Syria, during the height of the dirty war over that period of 2012, into 2020. Okay? So this is beyond debate at this point. And by the way, the Iraqi parliament has passed multiple resolutions, made multiple statements condemning the US presence in Iraq. Nobody wants them there in Iraq. Nobody wants them in Syria. The Syrian government never invited them. The United States flew in and occupied with their Kurdish militia proxies. Those are real proxies, the ones the United States are paying and developing there to create a breakaway state in Northeastern Syria. A lot of people might be surprised at everything I'm saying, but this is all factual. You can go ahead and Look it up, but you will not I guarantee you will not hear or see anything like this in the United States mainstream media or the European media or the UK, for that matter. This idea that the United States has to escalate, in order to deescalate tensions, in the region is ridiculous. Likewise, the idea that United States is doing this as a deterrent against Iran is ridiculous because Iran didn't attack the United States. It's the Iraqi militias, the PMUs. It's the resistance in Syria and Iraq. You're not going to deter them. They are not Iran. They will continue to attack US facilities because they don't want them there. United States is illegal. They shouldn't be occupying Syria and the Iraqis don't want them either. So Washington is totally tied up in knots as usual on this issue, and nobody within the Beltway knows what's going on in the Middle East anymore. It certainly doesn't look like I do. So why are these lies important? Because these lies paper over reality, and we see this time and time again. With Crane, the lie to justify the proxy war against Russia was that Russia was planning to take over the whole of Ukraine and then reestablish the Russian Empire in Eastern Europe. And because of that, it gave the green light for this massive unprecedented Arms build up and proxy war in Ukraine is was a lie. What it was designed to do cover up the reality that NATO is the one who has been expanding. So in similar fashion, the the the other big lie here is that Iran is planning to take over the region and reestablish the Persian Empire. You laugh, but I hear people in Washington tell us this all the time. And in similar fashion, the other lie is that Hamas intends to genocide All Jews in Palestine and Israel. This is another lie that's designed to cover up the reality, the proven documented fact that Israel is undertaking, intends to and is executing an actual genocide in Gaza. So time and time again, you See these lies one after another. And this latest one is that the Iran has killed 3 US service I mean, Americans are up in arms demanding that the United States, once again turn the Middle East into, a glass crater. So a literal reboot of the neo conservative hysterics, okay? The reality is this, the reason the It states are in those positions illegally in Syria and in Jordan and everywhere else in the region for that matter is because of the state of Israel. Israel requires the United States be there to weaken their neighbor to the North Syria, but also to prevent Any, functional border between Syria and Iraq that can be used for trade or even for military assistance, of course, from Iran all the way to Lebanon. Okay? That is the reason. So let's not lie to ourselves. And by the way, the US is stealing the oil in Syria. Donald Trump said it. We need to go take the oil. The United States went and took the oil, and they're still taking the oil. And they're using the Funds from the stolen Syrian oil that should be going to heat homes in Syria while they're being embargoed, while people are starving in Syria. The United States steals that fuel and then sells it for cash and uses that cash for a slush fund likely for black ops or something like this. It's probably been quite useful, to have, some cash that you don't have to get appropriations from Congress for. So that's the reality of the situation there. So let's just dispense, with any pretenses here. ISIS is not there on its own. ISIS can only exist with the US presence in the region. Okay? The US has done nothing, to eliminate ISIS. In fact, if you wanna know the real truth of it, When ISIS rose out of nowhere in 2014, the ones who defeated ISIS on the ground in Iraq, okay, between 2014 and 2017. Who did the heavy lifting on the ground? Face to face combat was the Iraqi PMUs, was the Hashd al Shaabi and the Quds forces led by Qasem Soleimani. They fought and they defeated ISIS. The United States did stuff in the air that is debatable, how consequential it was. They did manage to flatten the entire city of Mosul And Iraq, so the United States does have that on its resume. They they are good at, reducing cities to rubble like the Israelis have done in Gaza. So but in terms of actual defeating ISIS, who took the losses, who drew the blood? It was the Iraqis. They fought this, Western backed and Gulf state backed creation. This monstrosity known as the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria or Iraq and Levant or Iraq and Sham, whatever, way you wanna pronounce the acronym of ISIS. ISIS comes from Al Qaeda. Al Qaeda comes from again the United States and the British. So let's get our history straight When we're trying to see what's going on today and take the propaganda, wrap it up into a nice neat little ball and throw it into the bin because that's about how useful all of the stuff coming out of the mainstream media conveyor belt of lies is to you in the real world.

@21WIRE - Patrick Henningsen

ADDENDUM: This week, the warhawks in Washington have treated U.S. media consumers with another episode of “shock and awe” as it launches a series of attacks which it claims are targeting alleged “pro-Iranian groups” located in Syria and Iraq.  While this display of military prowess may play well to an American domestic audience, the reality is that the White House has further antagonized multiple sovereign states and non state actors in the region who would like to see an accelerated exit by the US from a beleaguered Middle East. The United States is already on extremely weak footing in both Syria and Iraq, and locals have made it very clear their occupation presence is unwelcome – a key point which most in Washington have chosen to ignore. Far from deterring regional opposition to the occupation activities of the US and Israel, this move by Biden is only going to speed-up that process of pushing the US asset out of their remaining exposed positions…

Truthtellerftm
Posted - May 18, 2024 at 1:09 AM
Saved - June 15, 2025 at 11:28 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared updates on the ongoing issues surrounding Iraq's oil revenues, highlighting that an estimated $150 billion has been smuggled out since 2003, according to Iraqi President Barham Salih. The U.S. administration has been criticized for withholding oil proceeds amidst Iraq's economic struggles. I also touched on historical contexts, including Iraq's military support during the Iran-Iraq War and the geopolitical dynamics of that era. Additionally, I pointed out the extraction of oil by companies like BP post-invasion and raised questions about broader thefts, including gold.

@Truthtellerftm - Truth_teller 🇷🇺

🚨🇺🇸🇮🇶UPDATE: HOW MUCH OIL HAS THE US STOLEN FROM IRAQ? ❌Of the close to one trillion dollars made from oil since 2003, an estimated $150 billion of stolen money has been smuggled out of Iraq,” Iraqi president Barham Salih said in a televised speech. ❌The statement came as the Iraqi President submitted a draft Corrupt Funds Recovery Act to the Iraqi Parliament. ❌👹The administration of US President Joe Biden has refused to provide Iraq with the proceeds of its oil sales at a time that the Arab country is struggling with a crippled economy due to Washington’s illegal sanctions, Iraqi officials say. ✅How can U.S., NATO, and ISRAELI backed terrorism end? ❌“Terrorism can only be eliminated by draining its sources of funding based on corruption money as a political economy of violent,” Salih added. ❌The US currently has some 2,500 troops in Iraq focused on the mission to SUPPORT ISIS as part of Operation Inherent Resolve! ❌Moeen al-Kadhimi, a member of the Iraqi Parliament on the Finance Committee, denounced the US ban as an infringement on Iraqi sovereignty, saying, “The American side is making excuses to not give Iraq its legal, legitimate money from oil sales.” ❌According to a statement issued by the Iraqi Ministry of Oil, Iraq has achieved “more than $115 billion in crude oil exports for the year 2022,exporting more than 1.2 billion barrels, averaging 3.3 million barrels per day.” ✅How much oil have the BRITISH EXTRACTED and STOLEN from IRAQ? ❌BP Extracted £15 Billion of Iraqi Oil After British Invasion in 2009. BP has pumped 262 million barrels of Iraqi oil since 2011 and pumped oil worth £15.4bn in Iraq when it began production in the country for the first time in nearly four decades, new analysis shows. #Iraq SOURCE: CNN WORLD, Middle East Monitor, Reuters

@Truthtellerftm - Truth_teller 🇷🇺

🚨🇮🇶🇺🇸What else did the U.S. steal from Iraq? Billions in gold!

@Truthtellerftm - Truth_teller 🇷🇺

🚨🇺🇸IRAQI GOLD THIEF, Sen. Tim cotton, calls American university students protesting for Palestine Khamas sympathizers, fanatics and freaks! They’re little Gazans! https://t.co/QqpLv8sYOh

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses what they call "little Gazas" that have risen up on campuses across America. They criticize liberal college administrators and politicians for not restoring law and order and protecting other students. The speaker describes these "little Gazas" as "disgusting cesspools of anti-Semitic hate" full of pro-Hamas sympathizers, fanatics, and freaks. They claim that the terrorist sympathizers in these "little Gazas" are violently and illegally demanding death for Israel, just like the Ayatollahs in Iran.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We're here to discuss the little Gaza's that have risen up on campuses across America, and the liberal college administrators and politicians who refuse to restore law and order and to protect other students. These little Gaza's are disgusting cesspools of anti Semitic hate, full of pro Hamas sympathizers, fanatics, freaks. The terrorist sympathizers in these little Gaza's aren't peacefully protesting Israel's conduct of the war. They're violently and illegally demanding death for Israel, just like their ideological twins, the Ayatollahs in Iran.

@Truthtellerftm - Truth_teller 🇷🇺

Let’s learn more about the Iraqi invasion of Iran in 1980!

@RTSG_Main - RTSG

Saddam Hussein invaded Iran in 1980. Israel invaded Lebanon in 1982. Yes defending your own borders from an invader is a more immediate priority. Despite this, Iran still sent two expeditionary battalions to fight Israel in Lebanon. Saddam meanwhile armed Israel-aligned Maronite forces that used these weapons to wage war & massacres against Palestinians and their allies in Lebanon. In fact, by 1984, declassified US and Israeli intel reports directly state Iran is "more dangerous" than Saddam's Iraq to "Israel's existence" due to "growing Iranian influence and presence in Lebanon". It is obvious that reports such as this are in direct response to the geopolitical positions both countries respectively took with regards to the Lebanon conflict. As for "support", Iraq received in total $80 billion USD (1988) worth of arms from foreign countries, of which a third (~$27 billion) came from Western aligned states. Bizarre considering Iraq's military prior was built around Soviet-logistics and equipment. Iraq on top of that took $150 billion (1988 USD) total in loans from Western aligned states (primarily GCC states), indebting itself and in-effect weakening its own financial sovereignty. Iran only purchased in total $24 billion USD (1988) worth of arms (Iran's biggest suppliers being "rogue states" like North Korea & Gaddafi's Libya), along with no such loans, due to the various international embargoes. Yes, Iran did smuggle some Western arms and that's because of the fact the military the revolutionary govt inherited (the Shah's army) was logistically organised around Western-equipment. Unlike you, I'm not so arrogant to deny that. But by the end of the war, Iran's logistics largely became similar to an Eastern-bloc style military as the few countries they were able to replenish their weapons supplies from were states like the aforementioned Libyans, North Koreans, and others. Iraq purchased as much from France ($17B) alone as Iran's total purchases through the whole war ($24B). Do you ever have something to do than post about Iran all day? Like seriously. Besides the point that almost everything you post is some cheap/intellectually dishonest spin or completely fabricated lie; it is not healthy to be obsessively thinking about an old man and his country all day! It is very easy to unveil the negative image of the leaders that are your idols, as there is plenty of damning information about them. But such efforts are a waste of time, achieve nothing, and is odd obsessive behavior. None of this ideological nonsense matters except your position towards global financial hegemony centered in Wall Street & City of London; and it's clear by your recent opportunist Tucker posts which side of the line you stand on. Have a nice day 🙂

@Truthtellerftm - Truth_teller 🇷🇺

🚨✡️Look who’s been stealing Iraqi oil! https://t.co/u6hAiX6jdW

KevorkAlmassian
Posted - May 29, 2024 at 10:19 AM
Saved - July 2, 2024 at 1:32 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The real reasons behind the US-led regime-change war in Syria, according to Prof. Jeffrey Sachs and Tucker Carlson, include geopolitical priorities like removing the Russian Navy from the Mediterranean and countering the strategic alliance between Syria and Iran. The US also aimed to minimize the influx of weapons to groups fighting against Israeli occupation forces and block China's Belt and Road Initiative. Additionally, the creation of a Kurdish entity on the Eastern shore of the Euphrates aligns with the vision of a "Greater Israel" for some hardcore Zionists. However, these actions have resulted in a humanitarian crisis, with countless lives lost and millions displaced.

@KevorkAlmassian - Kevork Almassian🇸🇾🇦🇲

Prof. Jeffrey Sachs and @TuckerCarlson discuss the real reasons the neocons orchestrated the regime-change war in Syria. Sachs: “We started arming the jihadists in Syria and the US said Assad must go.” Tucker: “Why would you want to overthrow Bashar al-Assad?” Jeffrey Sachs referred to multiple points such as the presence of Russia's navy on the Mediterranean in Syria, installing an American puppet in Damascus and sheer ignorance from the American decision-makers. But, in my opinion, there is more to that. The US wanted to remove Assad from power for a few other factors: while removing the Russian Navy from the Mediterranean (and the Black Sea) has been a geopolitical priority, there is also the Iranian factor at play. The strategic alliance between Syria and Iran created a network of alliances between state and non-state actors in Iraq, Yemen, Syria and Lebanon and posed serious challenges to the US and Israeli hegemony over the region. Under Bashar al-Assad, Syria has become the "strategic depth" of the "axis of resistance" against American and Israeli dominance in the region. For example, in 2006, Syria's Assad opened the military warehouses of the Syrian army to Hezbollah which were used to repel the Israeli invasion of Lebanon and force them to leave. After that, Hezbollah delivered Syrian weapons to Gaza such as the anti-tank Kornet rockets. Therefore, the neocons and Zionists thought removing Assad from power would minimize the influx of weapons to the groups fighting against the Israeli occupation forces. Second, Syria is an important piece of geography in the Chinese Belt and Road Initiative. This explains the reason why the US forces are stationed on the Eastern shore of the Euphrates; not only to "keep the oil" but rather also to block the borders between Iraq and Syria, and eventually block the access of China's Belt and Road Initiative to the Mediterranean. Third, if you listen to hardcore Zionist theorists, they preach about the "Greater Israel". Where does the Eastern border of this Greater Israel end? On the Western shore of the Euphrates. According to these hardcore Zionists, the Kurds would be their neighbour on the Eastern shore of the Euphrates, and that is exactly what the US has done in that region. Washington created a large militia dominated by the YPG Kurds and encouraged them to separate from Syria and form their own entity. At the end of the day, whatever the reasons were, the US has committed a crime against humanity in Syria. A crime that will not be forgotten. Hundreds of thousands of Syrians are dead and millions more became refugees. The US supported the jihadists and created ISIS, al-Nusra, Islam's Army, Ahrar al-Sham, the Islamic Turkistan Army and many more terrorist armies and destroyed a beautiful and peaceful country with a rich history and civilization. In the discourse of this chaos, the Christians of Syria were ethnically cleansed from many towns and villages by these armies of US-backed terrorists.

Video Transcript AI Summary
In 2011, Obama suggested overthrowing Bashar al Assad, leading to years of war in Syria. The US attempted regime change, obstructing a UN peace agreement. Motives for overthrowing Assad remain unclear, possibly due to arrogance or financial interests. Similar actions in Libya resulted in chaos. These decisions lack transparency and have long-lasting consequences.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In 2011, Obama does the absolute neocon play of saying, almost out of the blue, by the way, why don't we overthrow Bashar al Assad, Syria's president? Well, that's a little damn weird, but suddenly you start hearing Assad must go. I was on Morning Joe when that statement by Hillary was made, and Joe Scarborough looked at me and said, Jeff, what do you think? I said, well, how are they gonna do that? That sounds like another pretty stupid idea. And it turned out that was 2 1011. We've had 13 years of war in Syria. 100 of 1, 000 dead. Destroyed the country. Of course, destroyed the country, and and who's president? Bashar al Assad. And interestingly, I can tell you. Yeah. I can tell you. In 2012, the US you know, there there were protests. There were things that were going on in Syria, but but the president said, okay. We'll send in the CIA to overthrow the government in Syria. And if anyone is wondering, we do this dozens of times, so don't have any illusion that this is unusual. It is the job, the terms of reference of the CIA to overthrow governments in other countries. I don't approve. I think it leads to war, destruction. It hasn't passed, Putin's notice that that's the job of the CIA, so it's another reason he doesn't exactly want the US on his border and so forth. Okay. So we start arming, the jihadists, crazy things in Syria. Yeah. I can say it. I'm just thinking because and the US says Assad must go. So a dipla the UN starts a diplomatic process, to try to find peace, which is the job of the UN. It's not to implement US regime change. It's to try to find peace. So the US, the UN succeeds in getting all of the parties to agree to a peace agreement except 1, the US. So the yes. So the idea that, you know, you couldn't find peace, you couldn't find these all these different factions in Syria, There was an agreement reached, but there was 1 obstacle to the agreement, and the obstacle was the US said on the 1st day of this agreement, Assad must go. And, the response was, you know, why don't you have it a process that'll be in 2 years an election or 3 years? Don't overthrow the government the 1st day. We have all this in place. And Obama, well, I don't know if it's Obama, probably Hillary, but whatever, said no. So that's why there was no agreement. But what was the motive? Like, why would you want to overthrow Bashar al Assad? Very strange. I've never heard an absolute intelligent reason for this. Believe me, their idea is we can do it, why not? 1 argument was that the neocons had a list and this is actually what Wesley Clark who was, you know, NATO's supreme commander in the end of 19 nineties. I know Wesley quite well, and he's also spoken about this. He said the neocons had a list that they were gonna clear out in the 2000 all of the governments aligned with the Soviet Union or with Russia. Now Russia has a naval base on the Mediterranean, and so Assad is therefore an enemy, or not an enemy. He doesn't rise to the level of being an enemy, someone whose peace you can take off the board and put in your own piece. That's all. So the idea is incredible arrogance. They don't think, honest to god. I don't know. Whoever gave that order knew nothing about Syria. That, I can guarantee you. But the downstream effects of that were were horrifying. Well, unbelievable because We created ISIS. So Yeah. But we probably created ISIS pretty directly because we funded jihadists all along the way. That's our story since 1979, actually. Yes. So this goes back a long time. They don't they're not clever. They're not honest. They're not transparent. They are arrogant to the hilt and they don't talk to anybody else, including to us, the American people, including to Congress, including to counterparts in other countries, and it gets you into trouble when you're so flippant and flagrant because remember what was happening in Syria, they did exactly the same thing in Libya. And you look at Libya, they decided to take out Gaddafi. Why? No 1 really knows. He was cooperating with us at that point. No 1 knows because, some people say Sarkozy, that that that Gaddafi had contributed to Sarkozy's campaign, that it was a personal vendetta. There are a hundred theories. The fact that there are a hundred theories shows that the whole thing was bullshit, to use a technical diplomatic term. You cannot even know right now why. What you know is that they misused the UN Security Council resolution to protect the people of Benghazi to launch a months long NATO aerial bombardment of Libya until they brought down the government, unleashed war in in Africa for the next 13 years until today, which is still roiling all of the countries of the region. They do these things because they can, because it doesn't count. Maybe another theory which is even a little maybe true. What difference? It's money. It's a business. We're running a business. We're trying weapons. We're doing this. Maybe it's all success from somebody's point of view that you have all these wars going with this big military machine. I don't know. That's that is a theory which is not completely dismissible because what you can't do, Tucker, is look and say, my god, we had a geopolitical reason to do this. This was really part of American security. We really needed to overthrow Assad. We really needed to take out Qaddafi because if we didn't do that something else would happen. You cannot even concoct a crazy narrative ex post that explains that. So these are not deeply explicable facts.
patricksavalle
Posted - October 31, 2024 at 6:13 PM
Saved - June 17, 2025 at 7:53 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
In mijn debat met 'christenen voor Israël' betoogde ik dat Rusland, Hezbollah en Iran cruciaal waren in de strijd tegen ISIS in Syrië, terwijl de VS en Israël hen probeerden te beschermen. Ik noemde voorbeelden van Amerikaanse luchtsteun aan ISIS en de rol van Hezbollah en Iran in de herovering van belangrijke gebieden. Ook bespreek ik de CIA's betrokkenheid bij het creëren van conflicten, zoals in Afghanistan en de steun aan groepen als Boko Haram. Het lijkt erop dat deze groepen vaak als proxy-legers voor de VS functioneren om geopolitieke belangen te bevorderen.

@patricksavalle - Patrick Savalle

In mijn debat bij @cafeweltschmerz met twee zeer slecht geïnformeerde 'christenen voor Israël' werd getwijfeld aan mijn uitspraak dat Rusland, Hezbollah en Iran en niet de VS in feite Syrië hadden bevrijd van ISIS. En dat ISIS een Amerikaans/zionistisch proxy-leger was. In de geciteerde tweets mijn onderbouwing. Als jullie wat willen toevoegen, plaats dan de artikelen over hoe de VS systematisch hun ISIS-terroristen probeerden te redden met air lifts en bombardementen. Hoe Israëlische ziekenhuizen de gewonde ISIS-terroristen weer oplapten. Hoe het IDF wapens leverde aan de 'rebellen'. Maar ook hoe Russische en Hezbollah commando's vochten bij Palmyra en stad na stad bevrijdden van ISIS. Hoe de Russische luchtmacht uiteindelijk de doorslag gaf. En natuurlijk dat de VS nu Oost-Syrië bezetten. En hoe NATO steden als Raqqa en Mosul met de grond gelijkt maakte. cc @Shohrehfeshtali

Video Transcript AI Summary
De spreker stelt dat Boko Haram en ISIS proxy legers van de Verenigde Staten zijn. Hij beweert dat de VS Afghanistan binnenviel via in Pakistan opgeleide Moedjahedien, waarna Rusland te hulp werd gevraagd. Volgens de spreker hebben Hezbollah, het Palestijnse leger, Rusland en Iran Syrië en Irak bevrijd van ISIS. De VS houdt nu het oosten van Syrië bezet en steelt daar de olie, samen met Koerdische partners. Boko Haram, Al Qaida en ISIS zijn Amerikaanse proxy legers, met steun van Turkije en Israël in het conflict in Syrië. **Translation:** The speaker states that Boko Haram and ISIS are proxy armies of the United States. He claims that the US invaded Afghanistan via Mujahideen trained in Pakistan, after which Russia was asked for help. According to the speaker, Hezbollah, the Palestinian army, Russia and Iran liberated Syria and Iraq from ISIS. The US is now occupying eastern Syria and stealing oil there, together with Kurdish partners. Boko Haram, Al Qaeda and ISIS are American proxy armies, with support from Turkey and Israel in the conflict in Syria.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Gezichtspunt, maar dat hele bijzonder gezichtspunt, dat is overal terug te horen. Zelfs Boko Arram en Isis, dat zijn natuurlijk gewoon proxy legers van de Verenigde Staten. Dat is ook buiten twijfel. Boko Arram, het begon destijds, dat heeft heel kort wat geschiedenis lesgeven, begon destijds toen Afghanistan werd binnengevallen door de VS, maar dat deden VS niet zelf. Dat deden ze door de in Pakistan opgeleide. Moedjaidyn, waarop die regering en natuurlijk Rusland te hulp vroeg, de USZR destijds. Dat was de eerste keer dat ik het zag. Dat zijn proxylegers. Nou, ISIS is een proxy leger. Wie hebben wie hebben Syrië en Irak bevrijd van dat Amerikaanse proxy leger? Dat waren natuurlijk Hisbolla, Palestijnse leger, Rusland en Iran. Die hebben nota bene, Iran, Iran daar eruit geslagen. Boke Aram, hetzelfde verhaal. ISIS is eruit geslagen? Ja, joh, de Eredivisie, de Eredivisie en Syrië zijn bevrijd door Rusland, door Hessbolla. Hoe bedoel je dat vanuit 2014? 2014. Dat is toch Amerika? Nee, die hebben nu het Oosten van Syrië bezet gehouden. Die pikken daar de olie. Dus die hebben een deel van een land veel groter dan Oekraïne houden ze nou bezet, samen met hun Koerdische partners. Maar weet je, dit zijn gezichtspunten. Maar in de geopolitieke is het vrij geaccepteerd gezichtspunt dat Boko Haram, OKida, al onze moderad Redbels, ISIS, dat zijn Amerikaanse proxy legers met heel veel steun in dit conflict, in het Syrië conflict van Turkije en Israël trouwens. Hamas hadden we het over

@patricksavalle - Patrick Savalle

Rusland, Iran, Hezbollah en het Palestijnse leger kwamen destijds Syrië te hulp bij hun strijd tegen ISIS. Ze versloegen ISIS ondanks pogingen van de FUKUS-alliantie hun proxy-leger te beschermen. De rol van de Russische, Iraanse en Hezbollah-coalitie in de nederlaag van ISIS was aanzienlijk. Rusland begon in september 2015 met militaire interventies in Syrië, dit was een keerpunt in de oorlog. Rusland bood cruciale luchtsteun die, samen met grondtroepen zoals het Syrische leger, hielp om belangrijke gebieden van ISIS terug te winnen, waaronder steden als Palmyra. Iran speelde een grote rol door directe militaire betrokkenheid en strategische ondersteuning. Iraanse militaire adviseurs, geleid door Qasem Soleimani, coördineerden inspanningen ter plaatse. Iran ondersteunde sjiitische milities in Irak en Hezbollah in Syrië met mankracht, training en logistiek. Deze steun was cruciaal bij veldslagen zoals de herovering van Tikrit in Irak. Hezbollah was direct betrokken bij grondgevechten in Syrië, gesteund door Iran. Hun strijders speelden een sleutelrol in diverse veldslagen tegen ISIS, vooral in samenwerking met Syrische regeringsstrijdkrachten en Iraans gesteunde milities. Op het filmpje: de Russische Specnaz droegen destijds Hezbollah patches.

@patricksavalle - Patrick Savalle

Iedereen die het destijds nog niet in de gaten had, zou inmiddels de Syrië oorlog toch heel anders moeten zijn gaan zien. Was jij zo iemand? Kun jij eerlijk zijn tegen jezelf en je wereldbeeld herzien? ISIS is een CIA/Mossad creatie. Syrië werd door Rusland/Iran bevrijd. Het

@patricksavalle - Patrick Savalle

@TheCradleMedia - The Cradle

ISIS-K is entirely a US intelligence construct Whether in Russia, Afghanistan, Syria, or elsewhere, ISIS — and more specifically ISIS-K — are US foot-soldiers deployed to destabilize theaters to advance US interests. @SNarwani Watch on YouTube: bit.ly/3TwxiaR

Video Transcript AI Summary
The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights (SOAR) reported that Western coalition helicopters were airlifting foreign ISIS fighters out of Deir Zor in Syria. Two sources told the speaker that the US coalition was airlifting foreign ISIS fighters into Afghanistan. The speaker didn't understand this at the time. The speaker believes the US needed to leave behind a dirty fighting force to blow up mosques, schools, and infrastructure to continue chaos after US forces left. This would impede the development of pipelines and roadways, preventing China, Russia, Iran, and Pakistan from connecting with Afghanistan. The speaker believes ISIS is potentially a US construct, and ISIS K is a US CIA construct.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But how did ISIS get there? Now I remember very distinctly covering the Syrian war that there was, the SOAR, the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, which is based out of The UK. SOAR reported that anti ISIS Western coalition helicopters were airlifting foreign ISIS fighters, not the Syrian ISIS fighters, but the foreign ISIS fighters out of Deir Zor in Syria. And, of course, Western media didn't report this one at all. But it was a shock because at the time, nobody could understand where are they taking them, back into the Iraqi theater? They need to shuttle them back and forth? No. Two different sources told me that the US coalition was airlifting foreign ISIS fighters into Afghanistan, which at the time, I didn't understand at all. But in light of what's happened, The US needed leave behind a dirty fighting force that would blow up mosques, blow up schools, infrastructure to continue chaos once US forces left to impede the development of pipelines and roadways allowing China, Russia, Iran, Pakistan to connect with Afghat Asana to keep the country chaos, basically. So, you know, the story of ISIS in itself, we talk about it being potentially US construct. ISIS K is really absolutely a US CIA specific construct.

@patricksavalle - Patrick Savalle

@patricksavalle - Patrick Savalle

Hoe de CIA al eerder oorlog uitlokte met Rusland (toen nog Soviet Unie). President Carter liet Afghanistan aanvallen door in Pakistan getrainde en bewapende Mujahideen strijders waarop de Afghaanse regering Russische hulp vroeg. https://dgibbs.faculty.arizona.edu/sites/dgibbs.faculty.arizona.edu/files/afghan-ip.pdf

@patricksavalle - Patrick Savalle

@Denachtzuster1 - Denachtzuster(s)

17/4/18 - ISIS is de bindende factor tussen internationaal samenwerkende westerse geheime diensten. De modus operandi is het oprichten van genootschappen met als doel regime change operaties. Ook Nederlands maakt zich hier schuldig aan #WarCrimes

Video Transcript AI Summary
Karl Ortiz reports from Aleppo, at the headquarters of the White Helmets, noting a logo of ISIS above instructions on how to heal. He points out the flag of al Nusra nearby. Ortiz states that neighbors have said the White Helmets only take care of militants with weapons. He highlights the proximity of Al Qaeda headquarters to the White Helmets headquarters. Ortiz shows a school with ISIS signage and a dress code for women prohibiting transparent clothing, perfume, and requiring full coverage. He identifies the building as the original red crescent, similar to the Red Cross. Ortiz shows the headquarters of Alnusra and a flag of Al Nusra alongside a sign for the American Syrian coalition.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hi everybody, I am Karl Ortiz. I am here in the city of Aleppo. We are in the headquarters of the White Helmets. We see here the main logo of the White Helmets. Over here, we see the teaching of how the white helmets have to heal. And right above, as you can see, is the logo of ISIS. Over here, we see the flag of al Nusra. And here is another flag. And here we have a jacket of the white helmets. A lot of the neighbors over here have said that they were not taking care of civilians, but only militants that carry weapons and fighters. Take your own conclusions. Al Qaeda headquarters here, and just like not even two meters away, it is the White Helmet's headquarters. This is school over here that it says, ISIS, Islamic State for Iraq, for Hashem, Palestine, Syria, Jordan. You see everything is walking distance. These are their moderate rebels. We in the West have been sponsoring. Here is the entrance of the school. This is a dress code of a woman It says you cannot use anything transparent, you have to be fully covered, that you should not show off, you cannot wear perfume. This is the entrance. You see that it's a red crescent. It's like the Red Cross. So this was the original red crescent. We're gonna do a little briefing. I show you the headquarters of the White Helmets. I show you the headquarters of Alnusra. This is over here. You can see here what it says. This is a group. This is the American Syrian coalition. Come close. This over here is the flag of Al Nusra.

@superjan - Superjan

Je weet wel ISIS waar wij, Nederland die mooie witte Toyota's aan hebben geleverd (Al Sham) en bij wie "toevallig" altijd onze airdrops terecht kwamen. Die ISIS, waar John Mc Cain een graag geziene gast was. Die ISIS.

@patricksavalle - Patrick Savalle

https://muslimnewsmagazine.tv/boko%20haram-a%20cia%20covert%20operation%20in%20destabilization%20plots%20Against%20nigeria%20or%20terrorist%20organization.html

Boko Haram: Terrorist Organization or CIA Covert Operation in Destabilization Plots Against Nigeria muslimnewsmagazine.tv

@patricksavalle - Patrick Savalle

https://t.co/kTamR3KRsk

@KevorkAlmassian - Kevork Almassian

The man in the photo is Abu Mohammad al-Julani, the notorious leader of the Al-Nusra Front, al-Qaeda's Syrian branch since 2012. For over a decade, I’ve exposed the CIA’s backing of this terrorist group, but in the coming days, al-Julani will reveal his true role: the head of a US-contracted army, serving the interests of Israel. As I’ve already reported, al-Julani is rallying his terror forces, with direct support from the US, to launch an assault on Syrian Army positions in the north (Aleppo, Idlib, Latakia). The real goal? To keep the Syrian Army entangled in internal conflict, ready to neutralize them if an all-out war erupts between Israel/the US versus Iran. But this is an opportunity—after years of pressure to delay the long-awaited operation in Idlib—for the Syrian Army to obliterate this terrorist force once and for all.

@patricksavalle - Patrick Savalle

En ja hoor. Ook Boko Haram kreeg Amerikaans geld. Zoals ik in de video zei. Boko Haram is een Amerikaans proxy leger. https://t.co/p7yDUPqg1M

@ricwe123 - Richard

So now we know USAID was also funding Boko Haram, a group responsible for terror attacks in Nigeria, Cameroon, Niger and Chad. (U.S. Congressman Scott Perry) https://t.co/8TKktzWlU7

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims that $697,000,000 of U.S. money annually funds Madrasas, ISIS, Al Qaeda, Boko Haram, ISIS Khorazan, and terrorist training camps. They allege that programs like the Women's Scholarship Endowment ($60,000,000 annually) and Young Women Lead ($5,000,000 annually) are not benefiting Afghan women, because the Taliban does not allow women to speak in public. The speaker states that USAID spent $8,840,000,000 in the last twenty years on Pakistan's education programs, including $136,000,000 to build 120 schools, but there is zero evidence that any were built. They add that USAID spent $20,000,000 to create educational television programs for children unable to attend these nonexistent schools. The speaker concludes that U.S. money is funding terrorism and demands that it end.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Who gets some of that money? Does that name ring a bell to anybody in the room? Because your money, your money, $697,000,000 annually, plus the shipments of cash funds Madrasas, ISIS, Al Qaeda, Boko Haram, ISIS Khorazan, terrorist training camps. That's what it's funding. If you think that the that the the program under operation enduring Sentinel entitled Women's Scholarship Endowment which receives $60,000,000 annually or the young women lead which gets about $5,000,000 annually is going to women who, by the way, if you read the inspector general's report, has tell is telling you that the Taliban does not allow women to speak in public. Yet somehow, you're believing and American people are supposed to believe that this money is going for the betterment of the women in Afghanistan. It is not. You are funding terrorism, and it's coming through USAID. And it's not just Afghanistan because Pakistan's right next door. USAID spent $8,840,000,000 in the last year the last twenty years on Pakistan's education related program. It includes a $136,000,000 to build a 120 schools of which there is zero evidence that any of them were built. Why would there be any evidence? The inspector general can't get in to see them. But you know what? We doubled down and spent $20,000,000 from USAID to create educational television programs for children unable to attend the physical school. Yeah. They can't attend it because it doesn't exist. You paid for it. Somebody else got the money. You are paying for terrorism. This has got to end. I yield, mister chairman.
apocalypseos
Posted - November 30, 2024 at 6:13 AM
Saved - December 2, 2024 at 1:42 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I discuss the U.S. support for Al-Qaeda and ISIS in Syria, revealing a strategy of using proxy forces to achieve military objectives. I highlight the brutal tactics employed, including sanctions that led to famine and medical shortages, and the organized violence against civilians. The CIA's involvement in supplying arms to these groups is noted, as well as the exploitation of humanitarian crises for geopolitical gain. I express concern over the media's portrayal of these actions, which obscures the harsh realities faced by the Syrian people.

@apocalypseos - 🅰pocalypsis 🅰pocalypseos 🇷🇺 🇨🇳 🅉

🇸🇾🇺🇸 Richard Black, Former Virginia State Senator: Al-Qaeda has always been our proxy force on the ground; they, together with ISIS, have carried out the mission of the United States; we are supporters of al-Qaeda today where they’re bottled up in Idlib Province; we wanted to starve and we wanted to freeze to death the people of Syria; we wanted to take the wheat away to cause famine among the Syrian people; there was an organized campaign of rape across the nation of Syria; the highest prices went to the youngest children because there were a great number of pedophiles and the pedophiles wanted to possess small children; we cut off the medical supplies so that the women in Syria would die of breast cancer because they could not get the medications; the United States has a strategic policy of using proxies to engage in war; when we fight these wars we have no limits on the cruelty and the inhumanity that we’re prepared to impose on the people; 🔸 The war [in Syria] began in 2011 when the United States landed Central Intelligence operatives to begin coordinating with Al-Qaeda and other terrorist groups; 🔸 We have been unwavering supporters of Al-Qaeda since before the war formally began; 🔸 We are supporters of Al-Qaeda today where they’re bottled up in Idlib Province; 🔸 The CIA supplied them under secret operation Timber Sycamore; 🔸 We gave them all of their anti-tank weapons and all of their anti-air missiles; 🔸 Al-Qaeda has always been our proxy force on the ground; they together with ISIS have carried out the mission of the United States together with a great number of affiliates that really are kind of interchangeable—you have the Free Syrian Army; soldiers move from ISIS to Al-Qaeda to Free Syrian Army rather fluidly; 🔸 The United States has a strategic policy of using proxies to engage in war; 🔸 Our objective was to overthrow the legitimate government of Syria and, in order to do that, we employed proxy soldiers who were the the most vile of all terrorists; 🔸 Something very similar is happening right now in Ukraine; 🔸 Plan B was the American seizure of the northern portion of Syria; it is the bread basket for all of the Syrian people; we wanted to take the wheat away to cause famine among the Syrian people; by stealing the oil and the gas we would be able to shut down the transportation system, and, at the same time, during the Syrian winters we could freeze to death the Syrian civilian population which, in many cases, were living in rubble where these terrorist armies with mechanized divisions had attacked and just totally destroyed these cities and left people just living in little pockets of rubble; 🔸 We wanted to starve and we wanted to freeze to death the people of Syria; 🔸 The Caesar sanctions were the most brutal sanctions ever imposed on ever any nation; during the Second World War sanctions were not nearly as strict as they were on Syria; 🔸 We devalued their currency through the SWIFT system for international payments making it impossible for them to purchase medications; 🔸 We cut off the medical supplies so that the women in Syria would die of breast cancer because they could not get the medications; 🔸 One of the last things that we did, and the evidence is vague on it, but there was a mysterious explosion in the harbor [of Beirut] in Lebanon; it was a massive explosion of a shipload of ammonium nitrate fertilizer; it killed hundreds of Lebanese people; it wounded thousands and thousands, destroyed the economy of Lebanon, and, most importantly, it destroyed the banking system of Lebanon which was one of the few lifelines remaining to Syria; I don’t think that explosion was accidental; I think it was orchestrated and I suspect that the Central Intelligence Agency was aware of the nation that carried out that action to destroy Beirut Harbor; 🔸 Throughout you see this Machiavellian approach where we use unlimited force and violence and, at the same time, we control the the global media to where we erase all discussions of what’s truly happening; so to the man and woman in the street, they think things are fine, that everything is being done for altruistic reasons, but it’s not; 🔸 One of the things that we did as we as we allied ourselves with Al-Qaeda and on-and-off with ISIS; we fought ISIS in a very serious way but at the same time we often employed them to use against the Syrian government; so it’s kind of a love-hate [relationship]; but we have always worked with the terrorists, they were the core; 🔸 We facilitated the movement of Islamic terrorists from one hundred countries and they came and they joined ISIS, they joined Al-Qaeda, they joined the Free Syrian Army, all of these different ones; 🔸 There was an organized campaign of rape across the nation of Syria; the highest prices went to the youngest children because there were a great number of pedophiles and the pedophiles wanted to possess small children; they were permitted to rape these children repeatedly; they were able to rape the widows of the slain civilians and possess them and buy them and sell them among themselves; 🔸 There were so many tens hundreds of thousands of Syrian women impregnated by these terrorists who were imported into Syria that it was necessary to change the law so that they would have Syrian citizenship and they wouldn’t have to be returned to their ISIS father in Saudi Arabia or in Tunisia; 🔸 When we fight these wars we have no limits on the cruelty and the inhumanity that we’re prepared to impose on the people, making them suffer, so that somehow that will translate into overthrowing the government and, perhaps, taking their oil, taking their resources;

Video Transcript AI Summary
Al Qaeda has acted as a proxy force for the U.S. in Syria, working alongside ISIS to achieve American objectives. Since the war began in 2011, the U.S. has supported Al Qaeda, providing them with weapons through covert operations. The goal has been to overthrow the Syrian government, employing ruthless tactics to starve and freeze the civilian population, exacerbated by severe sanctions. Medical supplies were cut off, leading to preventable deaths. An explosion in Lebanon, which devastated the economy, is suspected to have been orchestrated to further harm Syria. The U.S. has manipulated global media narratives to obscure these actions, presenting them as altruistic. Throughout, there has been a disturbing campaign of sexual violence against women and children, facilitated by the chaos of war, highlighting the extreme cruelty inflicted on the Syrian people in pursuit of geopolitical goals.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Al Qaeda has always been our proxy, force on the ground. They, together with ISIS, have carried out the mission of the United States. We are supporters of Al Qaeda today where they're bottled up in Idlib province. We wanted to starve and we wanted to freeze to death the people of Syria. We wanted to take the weed away to cause famine among the Syrian people. There was a campaign of rape. It was an organized campaign of rape across the nation of Syria. The highest prices went to the youngest children because there were great number of pedophiles and the pedophiles wanted to possess small children. We cut off the medical supplies so that the women in Syria would die of breast cancer because they could not get the medications. But the United States has a strategic policy of using proxies to engage in war. When we fight these wars, we have no limits on the the cruelty and the in inhumanity that we're prepared to impose on the people. The war began in 2011 when the United States landed, Central Intelligence Operatives to begin coordinating with Al Qaeda and other terrorist groups. And, we have been unwavering supporters of Al Qaeda since before the war formally began. We are supporters of Al Qaeda today where they're bottled up in Idlib province. The CIA supplied them under secret operation Timber Sycamore. We gave them all of their anti tank weapons, all of their anti air missiles. Al Qaeda has always been our proxy, force on the ground. They, together with ISIS, have carried out the mission of the United States together with a a great number of affiliates that really are kind of interchange. We have the free Syrian army, soldiers move from ISIS to Al Qaeda to free Syrian army rather fluidly. But the United States has a strategic policy of using proxies to engage in war. Our objective was overthrow the legitimate government of Syria And in order to do that, we employed, proxy soldiers who were the the the most vile of all terrorists. Something very similar is happening right now in, in Ukraine. Plan b was the American seizure of that northern portion of Syria. It is the bread basket for all of the Syrian people. We wanted to take the weed away to cause famine among the Syrian people. By stealing the oil and the and the gas, we would be able to shut down the transportation system. And at the same time, during the Syrian winters, we could freeze to death the Syrian civilian population, which in many cases were living in in rubble where where the these terrorist armies with mechanized divisions had attacked and just totally destroyed these these cities and left people just living in little pockets of rubble. We wanted to starve and we wanted to freeze to death the people of Syria. The CAESAR sanctions were the most brutal sanctions ever imposed on ever any nation. I mean, during the 2nd World War, sanctions were not nearly as strict as they were on Syria. We devalued their currency through the SWIFT system for international payments, making it impossible for them to purchase medications. We cut off the medical supplies so that the women in Syria would die of breast cancer because they could not get the medications. The one of the last things that we did and and the evidence is is vague on it, but there was a mysterious explosion in the harbor of, of in in Lebanon. And, it was a massive explosion of a of a shipload of of, ammonium nitrate fertilizer. It killed 100 of of Lebanese people. It, wounded 1,000 and 1,000, destroyed the economy of Lebanon, and most importantly, it destroyed the banking system of Lebanon which was one of the few lifelines remaining to Syria. I don't think that explosion was accidental. I think it was orchestrated and I suspect that the Central Intelligence Agency was aware of the nation that carried out that that action to destroy Beirut Harbor. Throughout, you see this this Machiavellian approach where we use unlimited force and violence. And at the same time, we control the the global media to where we erase all discussions of what's truly happening. So to the to the the man, the woman in the street, they think things are fine. Everything is is being done for altruistic reasons, but it's not. One of the things that we did as we as we allied ourselves with Al Qaeda and on and off with ISIS. I mean, we fought ISIS in in a very serious way, but at the same time, we often employed them to use against the Syrian government. So it's kind of a love hate, but we have always worked with the with the terrorists. They were the they were the core. We facilitated the movement of of Islamic terrorists from a 100 countries, and they came and they joined ISIS. They joined Al Qaeda. They joined the Free Syrian Army, all of these different ones. There was a campaign of rape. It was an organized campaign of rape across the nation of Syria. The highest prices went to the youngest children because there were great number of pedophiles and the pedophiles wanted to possess small children. They were permitted to rape these children repeatedly. They're able to rape the widows of the slain soldiers or the slain civilians and, and possess them and buy them and sell them among themselves. There were so many tens, hundreds of thousands of Syrian women impregnated by these terrorists who were imported into Syria that it was necessary to change the law so that they would have Syrian citizenship and they wouldn't have to be returned to their ISIS father in Saudi Arabia or in Tunisia. When we fight these wars, we have no limits on the the cruelty and the in inhumanity that we're prepared to impose on the people, making them suffer so that somehow that will translate into overthrowing the government and, perhaps taking taking their oil, taking their their resources.
ivan_8848
Posted - November 30, 2024 at 12:14 PM
Saved - August 23, 2025 at 5:23 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
For the past decade, I've observed how foreign powers have aimed to dismantle Syria, often misrepresented in Western media as a civil war. Rather than a direct invasion, the strategy has involved inciting and arming minority groups, deploying mercenaries, and spreading propaganda. I’ve come across various sources detailing US arms shipments to rebels, the role of AIPAC, and the manipulation of narratives surrounding events like chemical attacks. These insights reveal a complex web of covert operations and misinformation shaping the ongoing conflict.

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

ICYMI: The Covert War on Syria For the past decade, foreign powers have sought to destroy Syria. Most people are unaware since western corporate media pretend the violence is the result of a revolution or civil war. A direct invasion of Syria would pose difficult political problems. The preferred method in the modern world is to destroy a nation by agitating and arming minority groups while sending thousands of foreign mercenaries to join attacks and flooding the world with propaganda. “US arms shipment to Syria rebels detailed”; HIS Jane’s 360; April 8, 2016 web.archive.org/web/2016120508… “AIPAC to go all-out on Syria”; Manu Raju; Politico; September 5, 2013 https://www.politico.com/story/2013/09/aipac-syria-096344 "The Red Line and the Rat Line"; Seymour Hersh; London Review of Books; April 17, 2014; explains the false flag chemical attacks https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v36/n08/seymour-m.-hersh/the-red-line-and-the-rat-line “The White Helmets are a Propaganda Construct”; The Corbett Report; February 11, 2018; https://corbettreport.com/the-white-helmets-are-a-propaganda-construct/ "Leaked docs expose massive Syria propaganda operation waged by Western govt contractors and media"; Ben Norton; The Grayzone; September 23, 2020; https://thegrayzone.com/2020/09/23/syria-leaks-uk-contractors-opposition-media/ “A Short History of the War on Syria 2006-2014”; Moon of Alabama; September 14, 2013; https://www.moonofalabama.org/2013/09/a-short-history-of-the-war-on-syria-2006-2014.html "Outgoing Syria Envoy Admits Hiding US Troop Numbers"; (thwarting President Trump's withdrawal plan); Katie Bo Williams; Defense One; November 12, 2020; https://www.defenseone.com/threats/2020/11/outgoing-syria-envoy-admits-hiding-us-troop-numbers-praises-trumps-mideast-record/170012/ https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ours_8ygO0A

Video Transcript AI Summary
For the past decade, foreign powers have sought to destroy Syria. "Israel wants to reclaim Southern Syria, Turkey wants to reclaim Northern Syria, and the Persian Gulf states want a secure route for a natural gas pipeline to Europe." The "American Empire" seeks to destroy any nation that fails to open its economy to Western corporations. The preferred method... "to destroy a nation by agitating and arming minority groups while sending thousands of foreign mercenaries" and "funded by foreign intelligence agencies via massive arms smuggling that supplied billions of dollars in weapons to so called rebels." "American weaponry included expensive shoulder fired surface to air missiles and large anti tank weapons, like the American TOW system." By the end of 2,015, the Syrian government had lost control of most of its territory. "Russia announced that any aircraft that bombed Syrian forces would be shot down." "Israel expanded its Druze militias in Southern Syria" and "American aircrafts and artillery supported Kurdish forces" into Eastern Syria. "The White Helmets" were "founded in 2013 by a British ex military officer" and "funded to the tune of $100,000,000 by The US, UK, and Europe"—they "purport to be rescuing civilians" yet "no one in Eastern Aleppo has heard of them." "The covert war on Syria killed over 400,000 people and pushed 5,000,000 refugees." "Seven years has been a disaster under Obama" with "CIA and Saudi Arabia together" fueling a "proxy war" that brought ISIS; get out. The plot to destroy Syria failed as it reconquered most of its territory.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: For the past decade, foreign powers have sought to destroy Syria. Most people are unaware since Western corporate media pretend the violence is the result of revolution or civil war. The truth is that Israel wants to reclaim Southern Syria, Turkey wants to reclaim Northern Syria, and the Persian Gulf states want a secure route for a natural gas pipeline to Europe. In addition, the American Empire seeks to destroy any nation that fails to open its economy to Western corporations and supports whatever Israel undertakes. A direct invasion of Syria would pose difficult political problems. The preferred method in the modern world is to destroy a nation by agitating and arming minority groups while sending thousands of foreign mercenaries to join attacks. Details are explained in the tale link below: The Plot to Destroy Syria. It was assumed that these powerful nations could quickly destroy Syria, as they did in Libya. This proved difficult because Syrian President Bashar al Assad, pictured with his wife, is smart and popular. He was studying to become an eye doctor in London before his dad died in February. The Assad family has ruled Syria for decades and threatened no nation. President Assad is popular among the Syrian people. He provides social services and protects minorities, including 2,000,000 Christians. Few Americans understand this war because of corporate propaganda. This is not a civil war, but an invasion by foreign mercenaries who also armed and trained dissidents. This was funded by foreign intelligence agencies via massive arms smuggling that supplied billions of dollars in weapons to so called rebels. See the tell link below about the illegal arms shipments from Algazi, Libya, coordinated by the US State Department. American weaponry included expensive shoulder fired surface to air missiles and large anti tank weapons, like the American TOW system shown here. The evidence of American involvement was so widespread that political leaders admitted arming Islamic terrorists in Syria, but insisted they be called moderate rebels. American government websites even posted details on massive arms shipments. See the link below. By the end of 2,015, the Syrian government had lost control of most of its territory. However, the Syrian army proved tough and a stalemate developed. It was thought that a huge American bombing campaign could turn the tide, but the American public and Congress were not ready for another war, despite a major lobbying effort from AIPAC. The weapons of mass destruction threat was spun, but Syria defused it by agreeing to allow American contractors to destroy its chemical stockpiles. Yet even after this, the gassed his own people ruse was tried twice. This failed to generate support for American airstrikes. Russia had not objected when Libya was destroyed, but decided to intervene to save Syria. It vetoed the effort to establish a UN sanctioned no fly zone over Syria, knowing this is just an excuse for a massive bombing campaign like was just done in Libya. Starting in December 2015, a few thousand Russian troops and dozens of aircraft arrived in Syria. Russia announced that any aircraft that bombed Syrian forces would be shot down. Syria had formally requested United Nations member assistance to repel foreign aggression, and Russia and Iran responded as required by the UN Charter. This was a big surprise and resulted in a rapid reversal on the battlefield. The Russians infuriated Turkey by bombing rebel oil tankers that were openly hauling stolen Iraqi and Syrian oil to Turkey, so a Turkish general ordered the shoot down of a Russian fighter that had crossed their border for just a few seconds while turning. Turkey and much of Europe rely on oil and natural gas pipelines that flow through Turkey. The Russians let Turkey know that their Syrian conquests would not be allowed, and any further provocations could result in the destruction of these pipelines. Turkey told its allies that their secret partition plan had become a bloody mess that caused over 3,000,000 refugees to flood Turkey, and it was not worth risking war with Russia. This displeased its allies, so they attempted a military coup in Turkey. This failed when the Russians learned of the plan and tipped off the Turkish president. As a result, another plan was devised. Israel expanded its Druze militias in Southern Syria and provided occasional air support. American aircrafts and artillery supported Kurdish forces who invaded Eastern Syria from Iraq to continue the war after rebels lost interest in attacking. The Allies would support Kurdish dreams of an independent nation that included most of Northern Syria. This infuriated the Turks, who invaded much of the Turkish controlled region after warning the Americans to back off. This led to a stalemate in Syria that few Americans understand because of corporate propaganda. One example was the fawning coverage of the so called White Helmets. This group was established by American and British intelligence funding to produce propaganda demonizing this government of Syria. The world was told they are a humanitarian rescue group, but Syrians only saw them on Western TV or winning an Academy Award for a documentary that was propaganda promoted by Israel via Hollywood. A great expose of the white helmets was produced by the Colbert Report, linked below. Propaganda common in Western media was exposed by independent reporter Eva Bartlett. Speaker 1: You talk about the corporate media, the Western media, the lies, and all of this. Could you explain what you think might be the agenda from us in the western media and why we should lie, why the international organizations on the ground should lie, why we shouldn't believe all these, absolutely documentable facts that we see from the ground, these hospitals being bombed, these civilians who are talking about the atrocities that they have been experiencing. How can you justify calling all of us liars? Speaker 2: Sure. Thank you. Speaker 3: I mean, there are certainly honest journalists amongst the very, compromised establishment media. Let's start with your second question. So international organizations on the ground. Tell me which ones are on the ground in Eastern Aleppo. Yeah. Okay. I'll tell you. There are none. There are none. These organizations are relying on Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, which is based in Coventry, UK, and which is one man. They're relying on compromised groups like the White Helmets, which let's let's talk about the White Helmets. The White Helmets were fund were founded in 2013 by a British ex military officer. They have been funded to the tune of $100,000,000 by The US, UK, and Europe, and other states. They purport to be rescuing civilians in Eastern Aleppo and Idlib, yet no one in Eastern Aleppo has heard of them. And I say no one bearing in mind that now 95% of these areas of Eastern Aleppo are liberated. The white helmets purport to be neutral, yet they can be found carrying guns and standing in the dead bodies of Syrian soldiers. And their video footage actually contains children that have been recycled in different reports. So you can find a girl named Aya who turns up in a report in month, say, August and she turns up in the next month in two different locations. So they are not credible. The SOHR is not credible. Unnamed activists are not credible. Once or twice, maybe, but every time, not credible. So your sources on the ground, you don't have them. As for your agenda, not your, but the agenda of some corporate media, It is the agenda of regime change. How can the New York Times, I was reading it this morning, or how can democracy now, which I was reading the other day, maintain until this day that this is a civil war in Syria? How can they maintain until this day that there were un that the protests were unarmed and nonviolent until, say, 2012? That is absolutely not true. How can they maintain that the Syrian government is attacking civilians in Aleppo when every person that's coming out of these areas occupied by terrorists is saying the opposite. How do I quantify the support of the Syrian people? The elections. In 2014, the Syrian people held elections. The point being, overwhelmingly, the people support president Assad. There are people that want change in the government. We're not pretending they don't want change. Everybody wants change. But in terms of support of the government, the point is they don't see president Assad as the problem. They see the problem as terrorism. They see elements of of of of problems in the the the system that they have there, but president Assad, they don't see as the problem. They actually overwhelmingly support him. So I'm basing it on their choice in their leader, and I'm basing it on my interactions with people in Syria. Speaker 0: The plot to destroy Syria failed as it reconquered most of its territory, except for areas protected by Turkey and The United States. One last effort was made to promote a false flag chemical attack to justify a bombing campaign. Former British general Jonathan Shaw explained to Sky News that their story made no sense because Syria had won the war, so was promptly cut off. Speaker 2: You think anything what we've heard from either Sergei Lavrov or indeed the Russian ambassador has made it more difficult for The UK to launch any kind of attack without putting it to parliament? You know, I don't I I Speaker 4: think quite apart from all that, the the the debate that seems to be missing from this is, and this was actually mentioned by the by the, the ambassador, was what possible motive might have, triggered Syria to launch a chemical attack at this time in this place? You know, the Syrians are winning. Don't take my word for it. Take the American military's word. General Virgil, the head of, CENTCOM, he said to congress the other day, America Assad has won this war, and we need to face that. So and then then you got last week the the statement by Trump or tweet by Trump that that America had finished with ISIL, and we're gonna pull out soon, very soon. And then suddenly you Speaker 2: get Okay. I'm I'm I'm I'm very sorry. You've been very patient waiting for us, but we do need to leave it there. I'm very sorry. Thank you very much indeed. More to come on Sky News. Do stay tuned. Speaker 0: The covert war on Syria killed over 400,000 people and pushed 5,000,000 refugees into neighboring countries. In 02/2018, professor Jeffrey Sachs from Columbia University was invited by a major news network to discuss Syria. He shocked everyone by telling the truth. Speaker 5: President Obama said, Assad must go. Mhmm. And I looked at you and Joe, and I said, how's he gonna do that? Where's the policy for that? Right. And we know they sent in the CIA to overthrow Assad. The CIA and Saudi Arabia together, in covert operations tried to overthrow Assad. It was a disaster. Eventually, it brought in both ISIS as a splinter group to the jihadist that went in. It also brought in Russia. So we have been digging deeper and deeper and deeper. What we should do now is get out and not continue to throw missiles, not have a confrontation with Russia. Seven years has been a disaster under Obama, continuing under Trump. This is what I would call the permanent state. This is, the CIA. This is, Pentagon wanting to keep Iran and Russia out of Syria, but no way to do that. And so we have made a proxy war in Syria. It's killed 500,000 people, displaced 10,000,000, and I'll say predict ably so, because I predicted it seven years ago that there was no way to do this, and that it would make a complete chaos. So what I would plead to president Trump is get out, like instinct told him by That the was his instinct, but then all the establishment, the New York Times, the Washington Post, the Pentagon, everybody said, no, no, that's irresponsible. But his instinct is right. Get out. We've done enough damage, seven years, and now we really risk a confrontation with Russia that is extraordinarily dangerous, reckless.
AIPAC to go all-out on Syria Officials say some 250 Jewish leaders and activists will head to the Hill next week politico.com
Seymour M. Hersh · The Red Line and the Rat Line: Erdoğan and the Syrian rebels · LRB 16 April 2014 The full extent of US co-operation with Turkey, Saudi Arabia and Qatar in assisting the rebel opposition in Syria has... lrb.co.uk
The White Helmets Are A Propaganda Construct | The Corbett Report Contrary to what its multi-million dollar international PR campaign would have you believe, the “White Helmets” are not a group of volunteer search-and-rescue workers that sprang spontaneously out of the Syrian soil. When you peel back the layers of foreign financing and reveal the foreign intelligence operatives and murky lobbying… corbettreport.com
Leaked docs expose massive Syria propaganda operation waged by Western govt contractors and media - The Grayzone Western government-funded intelligence cutouts trained Syrian opposition leaders, planted stories in media outlets from BBC to Al Jazeera, and ran a cadre of journalists. A trove of leaked documents exposes the propaganda network. (Puede leer este artículo en español aquí.) Update (September 29, 2020): A few days after this article was published, the authenticity of thegrayzone.com
Outgoing Syria Envoy Admits Hiding US Troop Numbers; Praises Trump’s Mideast Record ‘We were always playing shell games,’ says Amb. Jim Jeffrey, who also gives advice to President-elect Biden. defenseone.com
WVanwagenen
Posted - December 8, 2024 at 12:09 PM
Saved - December 10, 2024 at 6:39 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I reflect on the belief that Assad's departure would bring peace to Syria, reminiscent of the optimism many had after the US invasion of Iraq in 2003. I witnessed firsthand the chaos in Baghdad in 2005, where violence and fear were rampant. The reality is that the US invasion was not about democracy but rather about destabilizing Iraq for Israel's benefit. Now, with Israel's influence in Syria, I worry deeply for all Syrians, especially religious minorities and Sunnis, as history suggests that such interventions lead to further suffering.

@WVanwagenen - William Van Wagenen

'Assad is gone so now Syrians can live in peace and Israel will leave us alone.' Most Iraqis and Americans thought the same after US troops invaded Baghdad in 2003. In 2005, I was in Baghad and the situation had become so bad, with car bombings, kidnappings, and torture, that an Iraqi friend told me, 'We just need some foreign power to come and save us.' One of my colleagues, Tom Fox, was kidnapped an murdered. But Israel did not orchestrate the US invasion of Iraq to bring democracy, or get rid of a dicator, or 'stablize' the country. Israel's goal was to cause the collapse of Iraqi society. Neocons in the Bush Administration immediately initiated polices to destroy the Iraqi army, spark a sectarian war, loot Iraqi oil, and divide the country into weak, ethnic enclaves that could never threaten Israel, including the establishment of an Kurdish State. With Israel and its allies effectively in control of Syria, I am extremely fearful for Syrians. Not just religious minorities but also Syria's Sunnis.

ShadowofEzra
Posted - December 8, 2024 at 8:45 PM
Saved - December 8, 2024 at 11:51 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
In 2017, I revealed that Donald Trump and the CIA were in a fierce battle over Syria, with the CIA focused on toppling Bashar al-Assad. Trump's defiance of the agency's plans led to a volatile clash, which I believe contributed to the rigging of the 2020 election in favor of Joe Biden.

@ShadowofEzra - Shadow of Ezra

In 2017, Julian Assange dropped a bombshell: Donald Trump and the CIA were locked in a fierce battle over Syria. Assange revealed that the CIA’s number one priority—and its biggest budget item—was to topple Bashar al-Assad. However, Trump’s decision to defy the agency and reject its plans to remove Assad sparked a volatile clash between the two. This is why the 2020 election was rigged in favor of Joe Biden.

Video Transcript AI Summary
There is a significant conflict between Donald Trump, his adviser Steve Bannon, and U.S. intelligence agencies, particularly the CIA. This tension centers on Syria, where the CIA has invested heavily in efforts to overthrow Bashar al-Assad. Trump's campaign policy suggested cooperation with Assad and Russia to combat ISIS, which contradicts the CIA's objectives. This creates challenges for the CIA, as many of its personnel have built careers and alliances with countries like Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and Turkey to support the overthrow of Assad.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Be aware that there is a serious conflict, between, say, Donald Trump, one of his strategic advisers, Steve Bannon, and other people around them, and the Central Intelligence Agency and some of the other US security agencies, quite a serious conflict, where they where they are pushing to they are pushing to preserve their power and make the president not change their policies that they want to keep. What's a prime example of that? I think it is the leading cause of this conflict. It is a policy on Syria. So the budgetary spend, the number one project of the CIA has been the overthrow of the government to Bashar al Assad by measured by the amount of their budget that they're spending. So they spend more of their budget on that than anything else. So Trump has an electoral during his campaign, a policy of not overthrowing Baselar Asset, although I don't think he put it explicitly like that, but cooperating with Asset and the Russians to attack ISIS, which essentially means not overthrowing, Basala Asset. So that's creating enormous problems for the CAA because not only do they have people that have specialized in doing that and to have risen to positions of power within the Central Intelligence Agency for doing that, but they've made extensive connections and alliances with Saudi Arabia, with Qatar, with Turkey, etcetera, in order to overthrow that government and, to support the forces, internal and external, that are trying to achieve.
Kanthan2030
Posted - December 9, 2024 at 11:20 PM
Saved - December 10, 2024 at 10:05 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared a series of insights about the conflict in Syria, emphasizing that it was a proxy war rather than a civil war, fueled by foreign jihadists and weapons. Many countries, including the US and Israel, colluded to topple Assad for regional dominance and pipeline interests. Once viewed positively, Assad's secular regime fostered coexistence among various groups. However, the US funded extremist factions, leading to widespread violence and the destruction of cultural heritage. The narrative around the conflict has often overlooked the complexities and the realities on the ground.

@Kanthan2030 - S.L. Kanthan

50 photos and other media to illustrate the truth about Syria and Assad. Long 🧵 https://t.co/622qn1xfJL

@Kanthan2030 - S.L. Kanthan

What happened since 2011 was NOT a civil war. It was a proxy war waged by 100,000+ jihadists flown into Syria from all over the world. https://t.co/lIHzpYYegr

@Kanthan2030 - S.L. Kanthan

Weapons also flowed from all over the world. And they were sneaked into Syria mostly across the Syria-Turkey border. Some came in through Syria and Iraq as well. https://t.co/VtTSj6dXqI

@Kanthan2030 - S.L. Kanthan

The collusion to topple Assad involved many countries. US and Israel supplied weapons, money and propaganda. Saudi Arabia and Qatar provided money. Al Jazeera did the propaganda. Turkey and Jordan played key roles in logistics. UK provided propaganda and established the White Helmets. France recruited traitors.

@Kanthan2030 - S.L. Kanthan

The two main reasons: * US and Israel want total hegemony in the region. The US has had plans to break up many countries in the region. Plus, the Greater Israel project. * Qatar wanted a gas pipeline thru Syria to Turkey to Europe. But Assad wanted an Iranian pipeline. https://t.co/M4lvlz8ZC5

@Kanthan2030 - S.L. Kanthan

In 2010, the NY Times travel section listed "31 best places to visit in the world." And Damascus - capital of Syria - was ranked #7! Why? Because Syria under Assad was peaceful, safe and prosperous!

@Kanthan2030 - S.L. Kanthan

In 2010, Vogue magazine had a nice article on Asma Assad, the First Lady of Syria. "A Rose in the Desert" described all her great works in education, theater, charity, hospitals etc. Asma Assad was born and raised in the UK, where she met her husband, who was an ophthalmologist.

@Kanthan2030 - S.L. Kanthan

The West once loved Assad. He was called the "Lion of Damascus." * France gave him the highest award -- Legion of Honor. * Queen Elizabeth invited Assad and his wife * Nancy Pelosi flew to Syria * European + Arab leaders met with him all the time * Even the Pope went to Syria

@Kanthan2030 - S.L. Kanthan

Syria under Assad was secular and moderate. Sunnis, Shiites, Christians, Alawites, Kurds, Armenians etc. got along with each other. No Al Qaeda, no Sharia Law, no Muslim Brotherhood. https://t.co/igSuWa0h7J

@Kanthan2030 - S.L. Kanthan

Syrians loved Assad. He could walk around and drive around Damascus and Syria without a huge security force. In fact, the Arab world loved him. In a 2009 Zogby poll - an American firm - Assad was the most popular leader in the region!

@Kanthan2030 - S.L. Kanthan

Assad is also a good father and a husband. He raised smart, down-to-earth, and compassionate children. https://t.co/Esl2SA6Pnp

@Kanthan2030 - S.L. Kanthan

Asma Assad was the ideal First Lady. https://t.co/B7eKsfKQnP

@Kanthan2030 - S.L. Kanthan

But for reasons discussed earlier, US and its evil friends decided to do a regime change in Syria. The "moderate rebels" were neither moderate nor rebels. They are low-IQ extremists & head-chopping terrorists aligned with Al Qaeda & ISIS. Al Qaeda = "Al Nusra" = "HTS" (Hayat Tahrir al-Sham)

@Kanthan2030 - S.L. Kanthan

The US-funded "rebels" are murderous thugs who ruthlessly execute men and women. They would kill Shiites and Christians just because of the religion. They have destroyed numerous Shiite shrines & mosques and Christian churches. #Syria https://t.co/3TDiBEjUmx

@Kanthan2030 - S.L. Kanthan

"Syrian" rebels are actually jihadists from all over the world, including Uyghurs from Xinjiang, China. These fanatics have terrorist camps for their own children, who are brainwashed to become even suicide bombers. This is not a "popular uprising against President Assad." https://t.co/3K30d3eSOQ

@Kanthan2030 - S.L. Kanthan

While US/NATO-funded terrorists targeted Christians, it was #Assad who protected #Christianity in all its forms. When the rebels destroyed historic Christian monasteries, Assad visited and rebuilt them. All the church leaders in Syria have repeatedly spoken in favor of Assad, but the US media deliberately ignore them.

@Kanthan2030 - S.L. Kanthan

US actively planned regime change in Syria as early as 2004. In 2005, CNN's Christiane Amanpour interviewed President Assad, when she brazenly told him that the US is funding Syrian opposition & trying to oust him in a coup.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Mister President, the U.S. is pushing for regime change in Syria, seeking a new leader and isolating you diplomatically. What are your thoughts on this? I am confident because my identity is rooted in Syria, not the U.S. Decisions about Syria should be made by the Syrian people alone. What if there were an alternative to you? Who could that be? Any Syrian could be an alternative; there are many eligible candidates. However, no one who is influenced by foreign powers should hold the presidency. This is a fundamental principle for us.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Mister President, you know the rhetoric of regime change is headed towards you from the United States. They are actively looking for a new Syrian leader. They're granting visas and and, visits to Syrian opposition politicians. They're talking about isolating you diplomatically and perhaps a coup d'etat or your regime crumbling. What are you thinking about that? Speaker 1: I feel very confident for one reason. Because I was made in Syria. I wasn't made in the United States, so I'm not worried. This is Syrian decision. It should be should be made by the Syrian people. Nobody else in this world. So we don't discuss it in Syria in Syria. Speaker 0: What would happen, do you think, if there was a an alternative to you? Who is the alternative to you? Speaker 1: Could be any Syrian. Any national Syria, and we have a lot. I'm not the only person, who is eligible to be president. We have a lot of Syrians. So we don't have any any problem about that. But no Syrian would be allowed to be president if he's made anywhere outside our borders. This is a Syrian principle.

@Kanthan2030 - S.L. Kanthan

Under George W. Bush, the US secretly recruited and funded opposition leaders in Syria. But Assad kept winning elections. Later, US State Dept. gave millions of dollars to establish a TV station ("Barada TV") to broadcast anti-Assad propaganda within Syria. #Wikileaks https://t.co/Kis8SNXnGh

@Kanthan2030 - S.L. Kanthan

2011 saw the biggest regime-change operations ever conducted by the US. It was called the Arab Spring. In Egypt, Mubarak was ousted. In Libya, Gaddafi was murdered by NATO. And so on. But Syria was the exception, because Assad was very popular with people and the military.

@Kanthan2030 - S.L. Kanthan

Thus, US deep state recruited Al Qaeda (AQ). Feb 12, 2012: AQ leader Zawahiri called jihadists all over the world to go to Syria & fight Assad ("cancerous regime"). Same day: Jake Sullivan - advisor of Hillary Clinton - sent an email: "Al Qaeda (AQ) is on our side in Syria"

@Kanthan2030 - S.L. Kanthan

Islamic terrorism on steroids Remember how the CIA armed the Mujahideen with guns and shoulder-powered stinger missiles to defeat the USSR in the 1980s? It was 1000x worse in Syria, where Al Qaeda was given tanks, powerful rockets, mortars, "hell canons" etc. #Assad

@Kanthan2030 - S.L. Kanthan

US weapons had an elaborate rat line that involved Azerbaijan's diplomatic airplanes, Saudi Arabia and finally through Turkey. Al Qaeda and ISIS got weapons worth billions of dollars. The CIA named its project, "Operation Timber Sycamore." #Syria #Assad https://t.co/mxaJGY3I9v

@Kanthan2030 - S.L. Kanthan

"Salafists, Al Qaeda and Muslim Brotherhood" US government and media were fooling the world, but US soldiers and intelligence officers in the field knew that they were training & arming the same people who did 9/11. Some Green Beret (US Special Forces) talked about it. General Flynn also wrote the famous memo in 2012, where he told the Pentagon that the groups that opposed Assad consisted of "Al Qaeda, Salafists and Muslim Brotherhood." For that, Flynn was fired! He later joined Trump's campaign.

@Kanthan2030 - S.L. Kanthan

US and Israel were openly supporting ISIS on one side and then using ISIS as an excuse to bomb Syria. Israeli officials, Kissinger, Thomas Friedman (NY Times) etc. praised ISIS for countering Iran. https://t.co/dll5rjJGb8

Tracking_Power
Posted - December 20, 2024 at 8:57 AM
Saved - December 20, 2024 at 9:37 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The situation in Syria has devolved into chaos, with no borders, resources, or military strength left, only the presence of various foreign forces and extremist groups. The so-called 'Blessed Revolution' has transformed a once-stable nation into a land of refugees and destruction. Initially framed as a fight for democracy and against tyranny, the narrative has shifted to focus on Iran and Hizballah. The conflict appears to serve the interests of foreign powers and financial stakeholders, while many remain oblivious or complicit in the sectarian violence.

@Tracking_Power - David Miller

The 'new Syria': no borders, no territory, no water, no crude oil, no army, no air defence and no weapons (except for those held by murderous al-Qa'ida gangs and foreign proxies). Just ISIS-in-suits, lots of Mossad, thousands of American troops, French Special Forces, German spies, Turkish asset-strippers, British 'diplomats', Zionist troops and constant Zionist airstrikes. The 'Blessed Revolution', which took one of the Arab world's most economically productive, stable and culturally sophisticated states and turned millions into refugees or vanished them into dust. First they told you it was for 'democracy'. Then they told you it was about removing a 'brutal tyrant' (unlike the very genteel Gulf rulers funding the regime change). Then they dared to tell you it was about 'Syrian agency', while all those telling you so were working for US intelligence front organisations. Now the ISIS-in-suits regime is in charge, they tell us it was about Iran and Hizballah all along. A sectarian war to smash Muslim unity; smash the Resistance; hand Syria over on a plate to the Zionists; and turn it into a playground for the financial interests of everyone who paid for the dirty war, all now jostling for their piece of the pie. And those who never understood — or lapped up the sectarian bloodlust — clap along like seals. Photo shows the suburbs of Damascus now.

KAGdrogo
Posted - January 8, 2025 at 12:18 AM
Saved - June 26, 2025 at 7:11 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared insights on Trump's recent repost highlighting Netanyahu's influence on U.S. foreign policy, particularly regarding the wars in Iraq and Syria. I believe Trump understands the deeper connections, even if he can't express them outright. I pointed out how Obama and Hillary were seen as agents of Israel, allegedly supporting groups like ISIS and Al-Qaeda. Trump’s actions during his administration, such as halting funding to these groups, were significant. General Flynn also seems aware of these dynamics, reinforcing the idea that many know the truth behind U.S. involvement in these conflicts.

@KAGdrogo - ĐⱤØ₲Ø🇺🇸

⚡️Trump just reposted a video explaining that the wars in Iraq and Syria came from Netanyahu Netanyahu “is STILL trying to get us to fight Iran to this day” “He’s gotten us into endless wars and because of the power of all of this in the U.S. politics, he’s gotten his way” This is the same Jeffrey Sachs that explained the “Greater Israel” agenda on Tucker Carlson and that the wars in the Middle East happened because Israel controls US foreign policy. ⚡️TRUMP KNOWS. Nothing is what it seems.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims the Syrian war narrative is false, stating Obama ordered the CIA to overthrow the Syrian government four years before Russia intervened. They allege the New York Times rarely reported on Operation Timber Sycamore, the presidential order to the CIA to overthrow Bashar al-Assad. Regarding the 2003 invasion of Iraq, the speaker asserts it was based on phony pretenses and that focus groups were used to determine how to sell the war to the American public. They claim the war originated from Netanyahu's theory that toppling Iraq, Syria, and Iran was the only way to eliminate Hamas and Hezbollah. The speaker accuses Netanyahu of pushing the US into endless wars and still trying to instigate a war with Iran. They dismiss the idea of "democracy versus dictatorship" as sensible terms.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The war in Syria. And you may actually hear from grown up reporters who are lying through their teeth or ignorant beyond imagining that, oh, the war in Syria. Yes. Russia intervened in Syria. Well, do you know that the that Obama tasked the CIA to overthrow the Syrian government starting four years before Russia intervened? What kind of nonsense is that? And how many times did the New York Times report on Operation Timber Sycamore, which was the presidential order to the CIA to overthrow Bashar al Assad? Three times in ten years. This is not democracy. This is a game, and it's a game of narrative. Why did The US invade Iraq in 02/2003? Well, first of all, it was completely phony pretenses. It wasn't, oh, we were so wrong. They didn't have weapons of mass destruction. They actually did focus groups in the February to find out what would sell that war to the American people. Abe Schultzky, if you wanna know the name of the PR genius. They did focus groups on the war. They wanted the war all the time. They had to figure out how to sell the war to the American people, how to scare the shit out of the American people. It was a phony war. Where did that war come from? You know what? It's quite surprising. That war came from Netanyahu, actually. You know that? It's weird. And the way it is is that Netanyahu had from 1995 onward the theory that the only way we're gonna get rid of Hamas and Hezbollah is by toppling the governments that support them. That's Iraq, Syria, and Iran. And the guy's nothing if not obsessive. And we're he's still trying to get us to fight Iran this day, this week. He's a deep, dark son of a bitch. Sorry to tell you. Because he's gotten us into endless wars, and because of the power of all of this, in The US politics, he's gotten his way. But that war was totally phony. So what is this democracy versus dictatorship? Come on. This is these are not even sensible terms.

@KAGdrogo - ĐⱤØ₲Ø🇺🇸

Trump KNOWS this but can’t say it outright …yet

@KAGdrogo - ĐⱤØ₲Ø🇺🇸

Which one of our “so called allies” do you think Trump is talking about here? He even said that he can’t say it, but he’s given plenty of signals that he knows. https://t.co/OYc0eMqhIL

Video Transcript AI Summary
Some allies that the U.S. works with and protects militarily are sending massive amounts of money to ISIS and Al Qaeda. When asked which countries are doing this, the speaker states, "You know who it is." The speaker then confirms that Saudi Arabia is one of the countries funding these groups, stating, "They're doing it. Everybody knows that." When asked about other countries involved, the speaker says there are others but declines to name them due to having relationships with people from those countries. The speaker asserts that "everybody knows that, and nobody says it."
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Some of our so called allies that we work with and we protect and we protect them militarily, they're sending massive amounts of money to ISIS and to Al Qaeda. So who who who are you talking who are you talking about there? You know who it is. What do I have to bring it up for? You know who it because you're running for countries, Jay, Joe. Saudi? Joe, other countries are giving massive amounts of money. People from other countries are giving massive amounts of money. Are you talking are you saying the Saudis are doing this? They're doing it. Everybody knows that. Okay. Any any other countries? There are, but I'm not gonna say it because I have a lot of relationships with people. But there are. And you know that, and everybody knows that, and nobody says it. Nobody.

@KAGdrogo - ĐⱤØ₲Ø🇺🇸

He already told us if you were paying attention.

@KAGdrogo - ĐⱤØ₲Ø🇺🇸

Listen very carefully: Trump knows who the deep state really is. https://t.co/YIK779gW83

Video Transcript AI Summary
They lied, claiming Saddam was developing nuclear weapons. They said there were weapons of mass destruction, but there were none, and they knew it. They claimed removing Saddam would have enormous positive reverberations on the region. Going into Iraq may have been the worst decision any president has made in the history of the country. We should have never been in Iraq.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: They lied. Okay. They said Speaker 1: Saddam is seeking and is working and is advancing towards the development of nuclear weapons. No question whatsoever. They lied. Okay. Speaker 0: They said there were weapons of mass destruction. There were none. And they knew there were none. There were no weapons of mass destruction. Okay. Alright. Speaker 1: No question whatsoever. They look. Bottom line, there Speaker 0: were no weapons of mass destruction. They said there are weapons of mass destruction. Speaker 1: If you take out Saddam, I guarantee that it will have enormous positive reverberations on the region. Speaker 0: Going into Iraq may have been the worst decision anybody has made, any president has made in the history of this country. That's how bad it is. Okay? We should have never been in Iraq. Speaker 1: I guarantee you. No question whatsoever.

@KAGdrogo - ĐⱤØ₲Ø🇺🇸

This is critical to understand. Despite what it appeared on the surface, Obama and Hillary were agents of Israel.

@KAGdrogo - ĐⱤØ₲Ø🇺🇸

Wikileaks revealed an email from Hillary Clinton that said: “the best way to help Israel is to overthrow the G0V of Syria.” Once you realize that Hillary Clinton and Obama were aiding AIQaida and lSlS because Israel runs US foreign policy, everything will begin to make sense. https://t.co/uMaIPqOt46

Video Transcript AI Summary
In a leaked 2012 email, then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton stated that the best way to help Israel is to use force in Syria to overthrow the government. The speaker questions why the American secretary of state would be willing to use American troops and money to overthrow the Syrian government, asserting there is no American interest in doing so. The speaker claims she is doing it to help Israel. The speaker believes this should be considered treason.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Here's Hillary Clinton, secretary of state in 2012. She said in in one of those emails that was leaked by, WikiLeaks, she said the best way to help Israel is to use force in Syria to overthrow the government. Now why is the American secretary of state willing to use American troops and American money to overthrow the government of Syria? There's no American interest there. She's doing it to help Israel. This should be considered treason.

@KAGdrogo - ĐⱤØ₲Ø🇺🇸

Trump stopped funding lsraeI’s proxy terrorist lSlS/AIQaida groupsand pulled troops from lsraeI’s war in Syria during his last administration. This is why they tried to stop him and it cannot be overstated.

@KAGdrogo - ĐⱤØ₲Ø🇺🇸

Trump was stopping Israel from overthrowing Syria in his last admin. He’s against their 7 wars for ‘Greater Israel’ plan so they’re trying to do as much damage as they can before he returns. https://t.co/W1v29GUN6L

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker stated the world would be better off with Saddam Hussein and Gaddafi in power. Iraq used to kill terrorists immediately, but now it's the "Harvard of terrorism." The speaker said that while Hussein was a horrible guy, Iraq was better then than it is now, as it is currently a training ground for terrorists. The speaker stated nobody even knows Libya, and there is no Iraq and no Libya anymore because it's all broken up. Human rights abuses are happening now and are worse than under Hussein or Gaddafi. Libya is a catastrophe, Iraq is a disaster, and the whole Middle East blew up around Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But you also recently said that the Middle East would be better off with Qaddafi, Saddam Hussein, and Assad in power. How does I didn't say Assad, but we certainly have not gained anything with Qaddafi. And you you look at what happened. I mean, look at Libya. Look at Iraq. Iraq used to be no terrorist. He would kill the terrorists immediately. It was like now it's the Harvard of terrorism. Iraq. If you look at Iraq from years ago, I'm not saying he was a nice guy. Was a horrible guy, but it was a lot better than it is right now. Right now, Iraq is a training ground for terrorists. Right now, Libya, nobody even knows Libya. Frankly, there is no Iraq and there is no Libya. It's all broken up. They have no control. Nobody knows what's going on. The world would be better off with Saddam Hussein A 100%. And Gaddafi in power? A 100%. As far as Assad is concerned. What about the human rights abuses? Let's talk well, you don't think they're happening now? They're worse now than they ever were. People are getting their heads chopped off. They're being drowned. They've right now, they're far worse than they were ever under Saddam Hussein or Gaddafi. I mean, look what happened. Libya is a catastrophe. You look at our ambassador as an example. Okay? Libya is a disaster. Iraq is a disaster. Syria is a the whole Middle East. And it all blew up around Hillary Clinton and around Barack Obama. It all blew up.

@KAGdrogo - ĐⱤØ₲Ø🇺🇸

lSlS/AIQaida = lsraeI/ClA

@KAGdrogo - ĐⱤØ₲Ø🇺🇸

The New Orleans terror suspect had an ISIS flag on truck but you’re supposed to forget that Israel armed and funded ISIS and AI Qaeda, along with the US deep state, (Israel.) https://t.co/ODRTU5SmwS

@KAGdrogo - ĐⱤØ₲Ø🇺🇸

Obama and Hillary funded, trained and armed lSlS & AIQaida because lsraeI runs US foreign policy.

@KAGdrogo - ĐⱤØ₲Ø🇺🇸

The reason Obama never wanted to take out lSlS is because he was really just a puppet of lsraeI & the ClA. https://m.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL1009/S00027/obama-and-his-family-tied-to-cia-for-years.htm https://t.co/nr3T1YAXct

@KAGdrogo - ĐⱤØ₲Ø🇺🇸

Does anyone REALLY believe Iran’s true controllers actually changed after 1979? The Iran-Contra affair, where a cabal of US/Israel officials covertly conspired with Iran — started in 1980, IMMEDIATELY after the fake 1979 Islamic Revolution

@KAGdrogo - ĐⱤØ₲Ø🇺🇸

Listen very carefully: This is THE SAME Jeffrey Sachs who TRUMP JUST REPOSTED⚡️

@KAGdrogo - ĐⱤØ₲Ø🇺🇸

This is the most important 13 minutes you can listen to right now to understand what is happening. America has only been going war on behalf Israel to expand their regional ambitions of “Greater Israel.” Syria was only overthrown for Israel. Jefferey Sachs explains perfectly: https://t.co/snUz84yxfA

Video Transcript AI Summary
According to the speaker, regime change in Syria is part of Netanyahu's 30-year war to remake the Middle East, a disaster that continues. Referencing Wesley Clark, the speaker claims the neocons and Israelis planned seven wars in five years to remake the Middle East, listing Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, Iran, Libya, Somalia, and Sudan as targets. The speaker alleges this plan originated with Netanyahu's "Clean Break" strategy in 1996, aiming for a "greater Israel" by dismantling governments supporting Palestinians. They claim the U.S., on behalf of Israel, has engaged in six of these wars, with Iran potentially being the seventh. The speaker states that Obama initiated the Syrian war in 2011, with Hillary Clinton declaring "Assad must go." They cite an IMF report praising Syria's economic growth before the conflict, arguing it posed no threat to the U.S. The speaker claims Netanyahu views any support for Palestinians as a threat to his vision of "greater Israel," encompassing annexed territories and potentially land from the Nile to the Euphrates, achieved through war rather than diplomacy. Obama's Operation Timber Sycamore allegedly involved the CIA working with Turkey and Saudi Arabia to overthrow Assad.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: All of a sudden the government in Syria changed. There was regime change in Syria. Who did that? Why? And what does it mean? Speaker 1: Well, it's part of a thirty year effort. This is Netanyahu's war to remake the Middle East. It's been a disaster. It continues to be a disaster. But as Netanyahu himself said after Assad left, we have remade the Middle East. And so it has to be understood as something that didn't just happen in a week, but has been an ongoing war throughout The Middle East. Maybe the right way to understand what's happened with Syria is to think back to a really remarkable occasion when Wesley Clark, the general who headed NATO, went to the Pentagon just after nineeleven, and famously he was showed a piece of paper that said, we're gonna have seven wars in five years, and he was completely dumbfounded. He said, what does this have to do with anything? And he was told that the neocons and the Israelis are gonna remake the Middle East. And the seven countries on the list are very telling. They were Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, Iran, and then in Africa, Libya, Somalia, and Sudan. And seven countries, we've been at war in six of them now. And I mean, we, The United States, on behalf of Israel, including in Syria. And so what happened in Syria last week was the culmination of a long term effort by Israel to reshape the Middle East in its image. That started with Netanyahu and his American advisors in 1996 in something called Clean Break, which was a political document that the Americans and Netanyahu made when Netanyahu became prime minister. After 09/11, it went into full gear with the Iraq wars being the first of those wars. Speaker 0: Clean break, what does that refer to? Speaker 1: Clean break is we're going to make a clean break of the Middle East. Speaker 0: A break with the past. Speaker 1: We're going to break with the past. We're not going to have land for peace, which is the idea that Israel would have a Palestinian state next door. No, we're going to have greater Israel, and we're just going to bash anybody that doesn't like it, and we're going to do that by bringing down any government that supports the Palestinians. It's a rather shocking amount of hubris. It has been, in my view, a complete disaster for The United States and for The Middle East. It has been Netanyahu's MO since 1996 actually, and he's been prime minister more than half the time since then. And The United States goes to war on his behalf, And what happened in Syria is the culmination of that effort. So seven wars in five years. Netanyahu came to The US in '19 in 02/2002, excuse me, after nineeleven. Actually, he came in 09/20/2001, if I remember correctly, and gave a speech that said, There's terrorism, but you don't fight the terrorists, you fight the governments that back the terrorists. That's the idea. So you go to war. You don't just have a kind of an anti terrorism effort, you go to war. And the first of those wars was Iraq, but Syria was supposed to be exactly the next war. And the timeline was this remarkable idea of seven wars in five years. According to all of the understanding that we now have from lots of insiders, from documents, from the archives, what happened was The US got bogged down in Iraq. There was the insurgency. We didn't move onward to the next war, which was to be Syria, which was to happen already twenty years ago. But in 2011, what really brought Assad down last week started under Obama. And yes, and this is also interesting. It doesn't really matter who's president. This is long term deep state policy. Obama ordered the CIA to overthrow Assad. So that started in 2011. Speaker 0: But why would Obama want to overthrow Assad? Because Speaker 1: Israel has run American foreign policy in The Middle East for thirty years. That's how it works. We have an Israel lobby. We have this clean break strategy. We have a plan for seven wars in five years. And what's interesting is they actually kind of carry out this madness. They don't explain any of it to the American people. They don't tell anybody, but you can watch step by step. We've had six of those seven wars. The only one that hasn't happened is Iran. And if you watch every day now, the MSM, the mainstream media is pushing for US war with Iran. Netanyahu's pushing for war with Iran. They're really trying to get this started to make seven out of seven. But Obama, for no particular reason, by the way, but he launched two of these wars on the list of seven. He launched the war to bring down the Libyan government, Muammar Gaddafi, in the fall of Or the war started in March 2011, and he and Hillary Clinton, his secretary of state, said Assad must go in the spring of twenty eleven. I remember scratching my head at the time saying, oh, that's interesting. How are they going to do that? Syria was a normal functioning country at the time, despite whatever you read, whatever propaganda is said, Syria was a normal functioning country. I recently dredged out a report by the International Monetary Fund on Syria in 2009 that praised the Syrian government for its reforms and its rapid economic growth, and looked forward to continued years of economic development. In other words, it was not this wasteland or this battlefield. It was an actual normal country. Speaker 0: Was it a threat to The United States? Speaker 1: It was no threat to The United States whatsoever, but it was deemed to be by Netanyahu a threat to Israel because of a simple reason, which is that Netanyahu wants to control all of Palestine, wants to rule over the Palestinian people, does not want a Palestinian state, and that has led to militant opposition. That's led to Hamas, that's led to Hezbollah, that's led to other groups. Netanyahu's theory is, well, we're never going to allow a Palestinian state, so we have to bring down any government that supports those militant groups against us, because our core aim is greater Israel. That's not much of a worthy cause, by the way. Having a Palestinian state next door and having peace could have saved probably a million lives by now over the last thirty years, but that's not Netanyahu's crazy ambition, which is- Speaker 0: What is greater Israel? Speaker 1: Greater Israel means, depending on how crazy the people are, either that Israel controls not only its geographic territory, but that it essentially controls or annexes the West Bank, the Golan Heights, which they've just enlarged Gaza. Golan Heights being part of Syria historically. It was part of Syria. It's claimed by Israel, and now with an expanded territory, and East Jerusalem. So everything that was captured in 1967, Netanyahu explicitly said, We're never giving that back. Now there are two motivations for that. One, Netanyahu says, Not safe to give it back because he doesn't want to negotiate any kind of peace or any state of Palestine. Then there are religious zealots, I would use even stronger terms, who use the book of Joshua, which is two thousand seven hundred years ago that said, well, God gave us everything from the river in Egypt, meaning the Nile, to the Euphrates. And there are zealots in Israel, and they're in the government who believe, yes, this is God's ordinance. We're going to take whatever we want. So the Niles to the Euphrates would include what? Well, you take the greater view of this, would include Lebanon, it would include Syria, it would include part of Iraq, it would include part of Egypt. And some of these people actually quote the Bible and say, we're going to do this. And it's a little sad and absolutely terribly frightening. But I'd say the more narrow vision is what they call from the river to the sea, from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean. That's taken as a pro Palestinian chant, but it's exactly the opposite. It is the greater Israel literal vision of the government of Israel. It's the literal idea. There happened to be 7,000,000 Palestinians there. That's a minor problem. Maybe they can be ethnically cleansed. Maybe they can be thrown out. Maybe they can just be ruled in a military dominant way. Of course, probably well over 100,000 have been killed in the most recent war by Israel. Official count, 45,000 of bodies claimed from the rubble, but we know that there are a lot more that have died since this war in Gaza began. But all of this is to say, this greater Israel idea says we can't make peace with the Palestinians, so anyone that supports the Palestinians is by definition a mortal threat to us, and when you have a mortal threat, you must destroy it. And so this is the opposite of diplomacy. It's war. And as Netanyahu crowed last week, it's war to remake the Middle East. It's all spelled out, by the way, in very clear ways, but you have to dig for them. You have to find them. You have to understand that this is longstanding. You have to understand that each president has played part of that role. So when we come back to Obama, he started the war with Syria in 2011. I can remember actually vividly the call that Assad must go. And yeah, I did scratch my head. I was actually, I think it was on Morning Joe when it was said, and I was asked by Joe Scarborough, What do you think? And I said, Well, that's pretty odd. How's he going to do that? It turned out it was going to be thirteen years of mass war, 300,000 dead and destroying a country. That's what it turned out to be. But Obama signed an order called Operation Timber Sycamore. People should look it up. You can find it online, but you can't find it in the mainstream media because it's not discussed. But it was a so called presidential finding that the CIA should work with Turkey, with Saudi Arabia, with others to overthrow the government of Syria. So that was the plan. We went to war.

@KAGdrogo - ĐⱤØ₲Ø🇺🇸

Oh, BTW - General Flynn knows too.

@KAGdrogo - ĐⱤØ₲Ø🇺🇸

Our job is to say the things they can’t. MIL-CIV alliance. They know. https://t.co/74XYZcZIKc

@KAGdrogo - ĐⱤØ₲Ø🇺🇸

A couple days later, he doubled down. They know.

@KAGdrogo - ĐⱤØ₲Ø🇺🇸

🔥General Flynn just spotlighted a thread implicating Israel and the deep state of the U.S. (Israel) for being behind ISIS, AIQaida and the regime change in Syria. It even mentions “Greater Israel.” I keep saying this but THEY KNOW. This is very encouraging to see from him. Thank you @GenFlynn for speaking out.

@GenFlynn - General Mike Flynn

A MUST READ THREAD (exceptional analysis and reporting—really well done). So what? Be careful what you ask for. “Want to know Syria's future? Look at Idlib -- the province under "rebels" control.” https://t.co/uZaETvpvF6

@KAGdrogo - ĐⱤØ₲Ø🇺🇸

⚡️

@KAGdrogo - ĐⱤØ₲Ø🇺🇸

Irregular warfare Nothing is what it seems ++ https://t.co/qhm7vMayv3

FracturedLight0
Posted - March 8, 2025 at 9:42 PM
Saved - March 17, 2025 at 12:42 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The posts detail the historical and ongoing turmoil in the Middle East, focusing on the destructive impacts of foreign interventions in countries like Iraq, Lebanon, Syria, Libya, and Palestine. I highlight how these nations were once thriving but were dismantled through calculated strategies aimed at control and exploitation. The narratives emphasize the role of foreign powers in creating chaos, erasing cultures, and manipulating economies, ultimately leading to suffering and instability. I express frustration over the indifference of the global community and a determination to resist the prevailing narratives.

@FracturedLight0 - Fractured Light

The Middle East was thriving… until 1948. Don’t believe me? I’ll show you The region was dismantled. Gaza, where it started, is the final act of a plan set in motion long before 1948 The blueprint’s tested. It works. Chaos. Death. Destruction But why? I’ll show you that too🧵

@FracturedLight0 - Fractured Light

In the 1970s, Iraq was booming. - Oil wealth: GDP exploded from $2.8B (1970) → $37.8B (1979) - Living standards soared: GDP per capita $280 → $2,900 - Life expectancy rose: 55 → 60+ - Baghdad was a modern, thriving city - The Iraqi dinar was worth more than $2 USD Now look at Iraq. What happened?

@FracturedLight0 - Fractured Light

The After: Iraq: A Nation Erased Phase 1: Saddam Was “Their Guy” Until He Wasn’t - The CIA installed the Ba’ath Party in the 1960s, paving the way for Saddam’s rise. - By the 1980s, the U.S. armed and supported Saddam in the Iran-Iraq War. - But Saddam got too independent. He stopped taking orders. - That’s when the U.S. flipped the script. Their asset had gone rogue. Phase 2: The First Gulf War (1991) – The Setup - Saddam invaded Kuwait in 1990 after April Glaspie (U.S. ambassador) hinted the U.S. wouldn’t intervene. - The trap was set. The U.S. crushed Iraq with Operation Desert Storm. - 500,000+ Iraqi children died due to U.S. sanctions. - When asked about it, Madeleine Albright said: “We think the price is worth it.” - Today, thousands of children are being slaughtered in Gaza. And we’re told the same thing. - Iraq was crippled economically but still had its sovereignty—for now. Phase 3: The Second Gulf War (2003) – The Real Heist - Weapons of Mass Destruction? Lie. The U.S. knew Iraq had none. - The real reason? Saddam was ditching the U.S. dollar for oil sales. - He planned to sell oil in euros, threatening the petrodollar system. - The U.S. & allies invaded, overthrew Saddam, and dismantled Iraq’s institutions. Who profited? ✅ Big Oil – ExxonMobil, Halliburton, BP seized Iraq’s resources. ✅ Defense contractors – Lockheed, Raytheon, Boeing cashed in on war. ✅ Israel & U.S. interests – Iraq was no longer a strong, independent nation. 🔹 Iraq is a country away from Israel. And as you’ll see, bordering them—or just being nearby—puts you in serious danger. Phase 4: The Aftermath – Chaos by Design - Saddam was executed in 2006, but Iraq was left in perpetual instability. - ISIS filled the power vacuum—the direct result of U.S. intervention. - Millions of Iraqis displaced, economy destroyed, resources looted. This wasn’t a “war.” It was calculated destruction. But calculated for whom? 🔹 Some things are untouchable. - Surrounded by cities reduced to rubble, one town remained standing—Alqosh. - It is home to the Tomb of the Prophet Nahum, a site sacred to Jews. - Despite entire villages around it being wiped out, Alqosh was left intact. Iraq was bombed into the Stone Age, yet this one site was spared. Are we supposed to believe radical Islamists, U.S. bombers, and warlords all decided this place wasn’t a target? The “Weird” Side – What Else Was in Iraq? 🔹 Iraq = Ancient Mesopotamia = Babylon = One of the oldest civilizations on Earth. 🔹 The Iraq National Museum was looted immediately after the U.S. invasion. 🔹 Stolen artifacts? Many were from ancient Babylon & Sumer. 🔹 Some believe the U.S. wasn’t just after oil—the Iraq War may have been about something much deeper. Something much stranger. 🕳️🐇 Iraq wasn’t a war. It was the same imperial playbook used for decades—just with different targets. This is how empires operate.

@FracturedLight0 - Fractured Light

The Paris of the Middle East 🇱🇧 Before war, Lebanon was one of the wealthiest nations in the Middle East. - The Lebanese pound was worth $3.30 USD - Beirut was "The Paris of the Middle East"—a global hub for banking, tourism, and culture - ☪️✝️ Religious harmony between Christians, Muslims, and Druze. A thriving, independent nation. Now? Lebanon is bankrupt, bombed, and in ruins. A failed state. What happened? Why? 👇

@FracturedLight0 - Fractured Light

The After: Lebanon: A Nation Torn Apart Lebanon didn’t collapse on its own. It was targeted. Phase 1: Civil War & Foreign Meddling (1975–2005) – Divide & Conquer - The Lebanese Civil War wasn’t just a civil war. It was a proxy war for outside forces. 🇺🇸 The U.S.: - Funded Christian militias and sent troops in 1982 under a “peacekeeping” mission. - Bombed Beirut in retaliation for the 1983 Marine barracks attack. *Goal? Keep Lebanon in the West’s sphere of control. 🇮🇱 Israel: - Invaded Lebanon in 1982 and occupied it for 18 years under the excuse of 'fighting the Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO). - Used the war as an excuse to wipe out Palestinian resistance. - Backed the Sabra and Shatila Massacre (1982), where thousands of Palestinian refugees were slaughtered. *Goal? Control South Lebanon & weaken Hezbollah, which they created. More on that later. 🇸🇾 Syria: - Sent troops in 1976, didn’t leave until 2005. - Played both sides—backed Christian militias at times, then Muslim groups. *Goal? Keep Lebanon as a buffer zone against Israel. End result? Lebanon became a battlefield for outside interests. Phase 2: Israel’s Occupation (1982–2000) Israel occupied Southern Lebanon for 18 years. - Bombed Lebanese towns regularly. - Set up a puppet militia (South Lebanon Army) to enforce Israeli rule. - Tortured & imprisoned thousands of Lebanese and Palestinians. - Committed massacres (Qana, 1996). Israeli military fired artillery shells at a United Nations compound, which was sheltering around 800 Lebanese civilians,killing 106 and injuring around 116. Israel only withdrew in 2000 because Hezbollah forced them out. Phase 3: The Rise of Hezbollah (1982–Present) - Israel’s invasion created Hezbollah. 🔹 Shia Muslims in South Lebanon suffered the most under Israeli occupation. 🔹 Inspired by Iran’s Islamic Revolution (1979), Hezbollah was formed. 🔹 Goal? Expel Israel & resist foreign control. By 2000, Hezbollah forced Israel to retreat. By 2006, they humiliated Israel in a war—Israel failed to crush them. 🔹 To the U.S. & Israel, Hezbollah is a "terrorist group." That may be a fair classification. But to many Lebanese people, they are the only defense against Israel. What are they supposed to do? Who else will defend them? Lebanon, like many nations in the region, has been forced into survival mode. After decades of war, occupation, and economic collapse, many civilians have no choice. They don’t pick sides—they pick survival. Some submit. Some resist. Many die either way. The tragedy of Lebanon isn’t just the war. It’s that foreign powers ensured that war would never end. Phase 4: The Economic Collapse (2019–Today) - Lebanon wasn’t destroyed by bombs—it was destroyed economically. - 2019 – The banking system collapsed overnight.📉 - The Lebanese lira lost 98% of its value. - People’s life savings were wiped out. - Electricity, food, and medicine became unaffordable. Who benefited? ✅ Western-backed elites moved their money abroad. ✅ The U.S. and Israel weakened Hezbollah by starving Lebanon. ✅ Lebanon was left completely dependent on foreign powers. Remember what I said about the dangers of being in close proximity to Israel? Phase 5: The Beirut Explosion (2020) – The Final Blow - One of the largest non-nuclear explosions in history ripped through Beirut. - 218+ killed, thousands injured. - Billions in damage. - Lebanese leadership covered it up. Was it just negligence? Or something more sinister? Either way, it destroyed what little Lebanon had left. Why Was Lebanon Targeted? Lebanon was too strategic and independent to be left alone. - Borders Syria & Israel - Financial hub – Could compete with Western banking. - Religious unity – Outside forces weaponized sectarianism to divide it. Now Lebanon is so weak, some fear it may be absorbed into Greater Israel. Yhis Wasn’t War. It Was a Process. 1) Divide the people. 2) Destroy the economy. 3) Control the country forever. Beirut was once “The Paris of the Middle East.” Now? Lebanon is a failed state. Not because of its people. Because foreign powers wanted it that way.

@FracturedLight0 - Fractured Light

Syria - A Nation Rising 🇸🇾 Before the war, Syria was one of the most stable and self-sufficient nations in the Middle East. - Debt-free – Unlike most countries, Syria had no debt to the IMF or World Bank. - Thriving agriculture & industry – Produced its own food, energy, and medicine. - No foreign military bases – Unlike Iraq, Afghanistan, or Libya, Syria wasn’t under U.S. occupation. - Religious harmony – Sunnis, Shias, Christians, and Alawites lived together without major conflict. Then came 2011. The so-called “Arab Spring.” 🔹 The media told you it was a revolution. 🔹 But in reality? Syria was targeted for destruction. What happened next wasn’t a civil war—it was a foreign invasion. 👇

@FracturedLight0 - Fractured Light

The After: Syria’s Destruction: A Manufactured War Phase 1: The U.S. & Israel’s Regime Change Plan - The Arab Spring “uprising” in Syria was a lie. - The CIA, Mossad, and Gulf States funded armed militants to overthrow Assad. - Hillary Clinton’s leaked emails confirm the goal was to weaken Syria to benefit Israel. Syria wasn’t targeted for “freedom.” It was targeted for resisting U.S.-Israeli dominance. Phase 2: The Rise of ISIS & U.S. “Moderate Rebels” - Who armed ISIS? The same people who claimed to fight them. - Weapons & money flowed to jihadist groups from the U.S., Saudi Arabia, Turkey, and Israel. - The goal? Destroy Syria from within, just like Iraq & Libya. - ISIS “accidentally” never attacked Israel—but always attacked Assad. A country who previously had no foreign military bases was turned into a battleground. Phase 3: Russia Intervenes – Assad Survives - Unlike Iraq and Libya, Syria had an ally: Russia. - In 2015, Russia sent its military to prevent total collapse. - The tide of war shifted. The U.S.-backed rebels lost. Why did Assad survive when Saddam, Gaddafi, and so many others didn’t? Russian backing? Yes, but that’s not the whole story. Was there something else? Phase 4: The Mystery – Why Was Assad Spared? 💥 Saddam & Gaddafi were executed. But Assad still stands. Why? - U.S. and Israel wanted regime change, but didn’t push all the way. Some rumors suggest Assad’s family has Iranian Jewish roots. If true, was he considered “off-limits” in a way Saddam and Gaddafi weren’t? Just like Alqosh in Iraq mysteriously survived destruction, Assad was never fully taken out. 💥 Is this speculation? Yes. But patterns are hard to ignore. —-------------------------------------------------- Phase 5: The U.S. Still Occupies Syria (2024) The war “ended,” but Syria is still occupied. ✅ The U.S. has bases in Syria—stealing its oil. ✅ Turkey controls parts of northern Syria. ✅ Israel bombs Syria regularly, violating its airspace. ✅ Sanctions keep Syria’s economy strangled. Syria survived—but for how long? It’s not free. It’s not stable. It’s still under siege. Syria Was Never About Freedom 🇸🇾 Before the war, Syria was debt-free, stable, and independent. 💥 Now? It’s a broken state—occupied, bombed, and strangled by sanctions. Syria was supposed to be another Iraq. Another Libya. Another failed state. It wasn’t about Assad. He was just in the way of making sure Syria would never stand on its own again.

@FracturedLight0 - Fractured Light

Libya Before: What They Never Told You We’re stepping just beyond the Middle East—but not out of the empire’s reach. 🇱🇾 Before NATO’s intervention, Libya was the wealthiest country in Africa. - Libyan Dinar was one of the strongest currencies in the world. - Gaddafi provided free housing, healthcare, and education. - Newlyweds received $50,000 from the government to start a family. - Gas was $0.14 per gallon. - Water infrastructure (Great Man-Made River) turned Libya into an oasis. 🔹 Then, the West decided Gaddafi had to go. For reasons 👇

@FracturedLight0 - Fractured Light

The After: Gaddafi’s Libya: Why They Had to Kill Him Phase 1: The Real Reason Gaddafi Was Killed The media told you it was about democracy. That was a lie. ✅ Gaddafi was planning to introduce a gold-backed dinar—an African currency independent of the U.S. dollar. ✅ Libya had no debt to the IMF or World Bank. It was self-sufficient. ✅ Gaddafi refused to play by the West’s rules—and for that, he was marked for death. ✅ He openly criticized Israel and the West—going as far as to say that America is controlled by Israel and that Israel was responsible for the JFK assassination. A self-sufficient leader who called out Zionist control and tried to break free from the global financial system? There was no way they were going to let him live. Phase 2: NATO’s Destruction of Libya (2011) NATO bombed Libya for months under the excuse of a "humanitarian intervention." ✅ The West armed & funded jihadists to overthrow Gaddafi. ✅ Libya’s government collapsed, and the country descended into chaos. ✅ Gaddafi was brutally murdered in the streets—Hillary Clinton’s evil cackled in an interview: “We came, we saw, he died.” - Who laughs about death? 🔹 Libya was "liberated." But what came next? Phase 3: Libya After Gaddafi – A Failed State Libya became a war zone overnight. ✅ Armed militias took over the country. ✅ The U.S. embassy was overrun and abandoned. ✅ Libya became a major hub for human trafficking and slave markets. ✅ ISIS and Al-Qaeda gained power. 🔹 Libya didn’t get democracy. It got destruction. Why Was Libya Targeted? ✅ Gaddafi wanted an independent Africa, free from Western control. ✅ Libya’s resources were too valuable to be left to the Libyan people. ✅ The West cannot allow self-sufficient nations to exist. Libya was never about freedom. It was about control. 🔹 Gaddafi tried to create a system outside the empire. They made an example out of him. 🔹 They dragged him through the streets, tortured him, and executed him on camera. 🔹 Then they laughed about it. Now Libya is a failed state. Its people are suffering. And no one in the West cares. This is what happens when you defy the powers that be.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker states "that is the land of unconfirmed." They mention "came, we saw, he died," and deny any connection between a visit and the death, while simultaneously expressing certainty of a connection.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So, I mean, that is the land of unconfirmed. Yes. Came, we saw, he died. Did it have anything to do with your visit? No. I'm sure it did.

@FracturedLight0 - Fractured Light

Before: Palestine Before 1948 Before Israel, Palestine was a country 🇵🇸 A real country with real cities—Jerusalem, Jaffa, Haifa, Nazareth. A real people with real culture—markets, schools, businesses, families. People had homes—until they came and took them. Then, everything changed. What happened?

@FracturedLight0 - Fractured Light

📌 Where It All Started: Palestine After 1947 1948: The Nakba ("The Catastrophe") The Nakba was the violent expulsion of Palestinians to make way for Israel. ✅ 750,000+ Palestinians were ethnically cleansed ✅ Over 500 villages were wiped off the map ✅ Terrorist militias (Haganah, Irgun, Stern Gang) massacred entire towns Entire families were forced out at gunpoint. Homes were stolen. Cities were emptied. 🔹 What was the justification? Israel’s creation was framed as a “safe haven” for Jews after the Holocaust. Zionists pushed the lie that Palestine was “a land without a people for a people without a land.” The massacres and forced expulsions were called “self-defense” against Arabs who rejected partition. 🔹 What’s the narrative today? ✅ Israel calls 1948 its “War of Independence.” ✅ The ethnic cleansing of Palestinians is erased or justified as a wartime necessity. ✅ Palestinians resisting occupation today are labeled as “terrorists.” The survivors had two choices: 🔹 Flee into exile—never allowed to return. 🔹 Stay behind—trapped under permanent occupation. 💥 Palestine wasn’t just invaded. It was erased. And world powers? After WWII, they didn’t just stay silent—they ensured it happened. 📌 Jesus Christ & Palestine: Why This Was Always More Than Land People say this is just about land. About war. About power. But what if it’s about something much deeper? ✅ Where was Jesus from? Nazareth. ✅ Where did He die? Jerusalem. ✅ Where did He cleanse the temple? The same place where the money changers rule today. And who hates Jesus the most? 🔹 The same people who wrote the Talmud—the book that: - Calls Jesus a sorcerer - Says He is burning in hell in excrement - Insults His mother, Mary The same Pharisees, Sadducees, and money changers who persecuted Him still run the world today. Is it a coincidence that the land Jesus walked is the land they want erased? That they want control of? Where is their Third Temple supposed to be built? Jerusalem. Palestine isn’t just another war zone. It’s where Jesus walked. It’s where He fought the Pharisees. And it’s being erased by the same forces that wanted Him erased 2,000 years ago. This was never just about land. This was about Christ too. 📌 How Israel & the U.S. Use the Same Playbook Everywhere What they did to Palestine, they later did to: ✅ Iraq – Massacred civilians, fabricated WMD lies, looted resources. ✅ Lebanon – Bombed into ruins, occupied, divided by war. ✅ Syria – Foreign-backed terror groups used to justify destruction. ✅ Libya – Gaddafi executed, country turned into a failed state. There are many countries I did not name. 🔹 Palestine was the prototype. The rest of the Middle East was just next in line. 1️⃣ Steal the land. 2️⃣ Massacre the people. 3️⃣ Create terrorists—or call them terrorists for fighting back. 4️⃣ Lie to the world & control the narrative. This is why Gaza is being wiped out in real time, and no one stops it. 📌 Why This War Feels Different You can feel it. Something is different. This isn’t just another attack—they’re trying to erase Palestine completely. This isn’t just war—it’s open genocide, broadcasted live. And they want you to be desensitized to it. “War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ethnic cleansing is self-defense.” They control the words, so they control what you feel. But there’s one thing they didn’t expect—the internet. The world is watching now, more than ever. Will it matter? 📌 Trump: The Trojan Horse for Zionism People still don’t get it. The same man they told you to hate is the same man who got their biggest agenda items done. ✅ He moved the U.S. embassy to Jerusalem—a MASSIVE win for Israel. ✅ He gave them the Abraham Accords, bringing Arab nations under Israel’s control. ✅ He starved Palestine by cutting off aid and backing Netanyahu 100%. ✅ He made sure there was NO real anti-war movement when Gaza was finally wiped out. If Hillary had done this, there would have been outrage. If Biden had done this, there would have been protests. But under Trump? The dissidents stayed silent. Many of the people most likely to fight back—the ones who saw through the lies—were neutralized. "Our guy" screwed us. Those dissidents were the most important to deceive. And they did it. If Palestine falls, it’s over. This was never just about Palestine. 💥 It’s about control of the entire Middle East. Greater Israel? Every nation that resisted has been: ❌ Bombed ❌ Couped ❌ Starved ❌ Forced under puppet leadership Palestine is the final war. If they succeed, there is no resistance left. And if you’re not angry yet—you should be.

@FracturedLight0 - Fractured Light

I don’t know how much more I can say. I didn't even say it all. Every day, I wake up and watch the same horror unfold. Children butchered. Cities turned to dust. A genocide playing out in real-time, and people cheering for it like it’s a sportball game. I watch world leaders, the media, and the so-called opposition all march in lockstep, pretending that this is normal. That this is justified. That this is good. I talk to normal people about it, and they look at me like I’m crazy. The facts are right there, out in the open, undeniable—but they don’t see them. They can’t see them. The brainwashing is too deep. The programming is too complete. It doesn’t matter what I say. It doesn’t matter how obvious the truth is. Is this the black pill? Did they already win? They control the banks, the governments, the media, the education system. They decide who lives and who dies. They don’t just control the narrative—they control reality itself. They don’t just hide information—they make sure no one believes it when they see it. And if you do see it? They make sure no one listens to you. Trump is openly talking about wiping out Gaza and building resorts on top of Palestinian graves. His followers—who once claimed to be dissidents—are now cheering for the extermination of an entire people. And the Israelis? They’re still dancing. Still celebrating. It will never be enough for them. There is no line they won’t cross. And the world? Most of the world doesn’t care. The blood of children runs through the streets, and people are too busy watching Netflix. Sometimes, I just don’t see how we come back from this. But here’s what I do know. I will die before I bow down. I will never conform. I will never believe their lies. I will never accept their version of reality. They can call me crazy. They can call me antisemitic. They can call me a terrorist sympathizer. They can put my name on a list. I don’t give a fuck. They can kill me. But they will never own my mind. Mel Gibson asked in Braveheart, will you fight? As long as I am still breathing, my answer is yes. They will never break me. They will never make me believe their bullshit. And if even one person out there wakes up because of something I’ve said or wrote, if even one person starts to see—it’s worth it. Until the very end.

ivan_8848
Posted - April 13, 2025 at 10:45 AM
Saved - August 28, 2025 at 11:24 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe Jeffrey Sachs deserves a Nobel Prize for exposing the truth about the Syrian crisis, which he attributes to a U.S. presidential order rather than Assad's actions. He criticizes the Israeli government's influence over U.S. policy, labeling Netanyahu a mass murderer. Chris Hedges highlights the devastating impact of Israel's actions in Gaza, drawing parallels to historical atrocities. Former IDF soldier Ido Gal Razon shares his trauma from participating in violence against Palestinians. There's a strong sentiment that Israel operates as a criminal enterprise, controlling U.S. politics and media.

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

🏆 Jeffrey Sachs Should Be A Nobel Prize Winner The Greatest Truth Teller of Our Time! Jeffrey Sachs "KILLED" MAINSTREAM NARRATIVE 'CIA operation Timber Sycamore created Syrian crisis' ‘US Trained Jihadists & Then…’: Sensational Syria Revelation At Antalya Forum So this war in Syria did not come from Assad's repression. It did not come from Assad's dictatorship. This war came from a presidential order by Obama to overthrow Assad, starting in the spring of 2011.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker argues Netanyahu seeks to make The Middle East in Israel's image and overthrow opponents, aided by the CIA and the United States. He claims the Syria war originated from 'a presidential order by Obama to overthrow Assad starting in the 2011' through 'Operation Timber Sycamore,' with US-led arming of rebels including jihadists, yielding '600,000 dead in Syria.' He says the CIA intended the jihadist group to take power in Syria. He calls for 'real diplomacy' not CIA operations and says the wars in the region are driven by outside powers, with 'America provides the financing' and 'Israel couldn't fight for one day without The United States backing.' He asserts there is 'no international community' and that the US blocked the peace process, leading to '500,000' dead since then, concluding that empires divide to rule and urging US withdrawal for regional self-determination.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: That stretches back more than twenty five years. Netanyahu's idea is make The Middle East in Israel's image. Overthrow every government that opposes Israel. He's had a friend in that and that is the CIA and the United States government. So this war in Syria did not come from Assad's repression. It did not come from Assad's dictatorship. This war came from a presidential order by Obama to overthrow Assad starting in the 2011. We have a name for this program. It was Operation Timber Sycamore. The United States together with other countries in this region trained rebel trained fighters, especially jihadists including the ones that just took power to overthrow the regime. This created chaos. 600,000 dead in Syria in a war that has gone on for fourteen years. The outcome of this war is what the CIA wanted back in 02/2011, which is that the jihad group would take power in Syria after being armed by The United States. The reason I wanna be clear about this is that we will not have peace in this region until we have public diplomacy that is based on real diplomacy, not on CIA operations. And we will not have peace until Israel stops its militarization of the entire Middle East because the Syrian war is just one of six wars that Israel has promoted including in Lebanon, Iraq, Syria, Libya, Somalia, and Sudan. We had the list actually from Wesley Clark back in 2001 when he was handed a paper in the Pentagon that the goal was seven wars in five years. The only war that hasn't taken place yet to Netanyahu's great consternation is the US war with Iran, which Israel is still trying to instigate to this very day. So the Syrian war is part of a regional tragedy. We have tragedy in Gaza, the West Bank, Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, Sudan, South Sudan, and Libya that I put at the hands of the United States government and its ally Israel because none of these wars had to happen. These were all wars of choice. They were all wars that came from the idea of regime change operations that The United States would determine which regimes operate in which countries. We'll never have peace in this region if outside imperial powers like The United States are dictating the terms to this region. The only way to have peace in this region is if this region is determining its own future, not outside powers. And Israel could never do these wars on its own. These are American wars. America provides the financing. It provides the military backup. It provides the naval support. It provides the intelligence operations. It provides the munitions. Israel couldn't fight for one day without The United States backing. Israel could not be committing a genocide in Gaza without The United States full operational complicity. I don't mean political complicity, I mean direct daily operational complicity. This has to end. This region has been divided for one hundred years first by the British Empire and then by the American Empire. And this is going on until today. We have a genocide going on right next door. Till today, till this morning. People being wantonly killed, brazenly killed because The United States is providing the means for this. So this is what's happening in Syria. Is The US on the fence? Hardly. It's the major actor. I know by the way, I know firsthand that in 02/2012, UN Secretary General Ban Ki moon appointed former Secretary General Kofi Annan as special envoy to reach a peace in Syria. I loved Kofi Annan. I love Ban Ki moon. I worked for both of them. Kofi Annan arranged a peace in 2012. He arranged a peace in Syria. You know why it didn't happen? Because all the parties agreed to peace except one. Literally one. That was The United States Of America. The United States Of America said there will be no peace unless Bashar al Assad goes the first day. The other party said no no, you can't just determine that. Maybe there'll be a process, maybe there'll be elections agreed, maybe there'll be a two year process, a three year process. The United States said no. Assad must go the first day of any agreement or we block it. And so Kofi Annan stepped down from his position after having negotiated a peace arrangement and we have had 500,000 people dead since then. We should not allow this kind of criminality to be normal. This region has been at war nonstop for thirty years. Actually I would say for at least fifty seven years since the Six Day War because there has been no honest accounting of international law, no honest diplomacy. It's been militarization all the way through and we could have peace immediately in this region. All that is required in my view is The United States change its veto of Palestine as the hundred ninety fourth UN member state because on that basis, all the region would normalize relations and the wars all across this region would stop. But Israel has had control of over US policy. And it says no. It wants greater Israel. It wants Israel in Syria. It wants Israel in Lebanon. It wants Israel in the West Bank. It wants Israel in East Jerusalem. It wants Israel in Gaza. And until that stops, we're not going to have peace. So is The US on the fence? Of course not. It's the major protagonist of this whole war and has been for the last fourteen years. I am not discussing the agency of the Syrian people. I'm discussing the opposite. Do not be naive. Do not think that 600,600 people died because of Assad and the protesters. This was a war. Wars are expensive. They require billions of dollars. They require armaments. And I'm not talking about a conspiracy theory. I'm talking about a conspiracy. And you should know. Everybody go look up Operation Timber Sycamore. Understand what happened in your region. And if you think that calling in the CIA is gonna do the bidding of agency in this region, you are sadly mistaken. This region has been manipulated by Britain, France, and The United States for one hundred years since the Versailles treaty. It will not have safety or peace until The United States is out of this region through manipulation and war. You all say well it's Israel doing this. It's the same thing I'm talking about. It's the same reason for Operation Timber Sycamore. It's not an independent fact, it's the reason why this happened. I'm the last to denigrate agency. I'm telling you exactly the opposite. If you think your big friend The United States is gonna do your bidding and help you get your way, Empires divide to rule. They are not doing the bidding of Turkey or Syria or Lebanon or anybody else in this region. And if this is, yes, you want to balance Persia or Iran, you call in The United States to do that and you think this is going to work out well, it's not going to work out well. This region has three major powers. The Arab world, the Turkish world, and and and the Persian world. It's been more than a thousand years this way. I said to Iranian diplomats that Iran has been five thousand years. I was corrected seven thousand years. It's a long story. You don't need The United States to pull the chestnuts out of the fire. And don't believe that this happened because of the agency of the Syrian people. I'm sorry. I'm not denigrating the Syrian people, just the opposite. I know what happened. I know what my country does. I suspect most of you do too. And it should not be ignored because the wars are gonna continue until we have real agency, not pseudo agency. And by the way, there is no international community. We're trying to make one, but it doesn't exist right now. That's the tragedy in this world. There is no community. There are interests. There are militaries. There are regime change operations. This is not community. We need real community. And by the way, I give every day my volunteer time to the UN for twenty five years because I believe in it. It's my life commitment. So I believe in community. I also happen to know that United States blocked the agreement in 02/2012. I'm sorry. I won't elaborate. But The United States blocked it and I know it.

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

https://t.co/ZLYanZBgd0

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

CIA in Syria - Operation Timber Sycamore - Professor Jeffrey Sachs https://t.co/VUrIrvkiQH

Video Transcript AI Summary
Summary: "the CIA and Saudi Arabia together, in covert operations tried to overthrow Assad." "It was a disaster" and it "also brought in Russia." The speaker calls this "the permanent state" and says "We have made a proxy war in Syria" that has "killed 500,000 people, displaced 10,000,000," and "I predicted it seven years ago that there was no way to do this and that it would make a complete chaos." He urges, "get out." Another speaker adds, "six hundred thousand dead and 14,000,000 displaced," and says the United States should be part of the solution. He notes this happened because of us, cites "timber sycamore"—"The CIA operation together with Saudi Arabia"—"shrouded in secrecy" and "never debated by Congress, never explained." Ending the fight means stopping overthrow of a government and rebel support; "contrary to international law, contrary to the UN Charter"; risk of "an imminent confrontation with Russia." "Go to the UN Security Council ... with Russia on a strategy for ending the fight."
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And we know, they sent in the CIA to overthrow Assad. The CIA and Saudi Arabia together, in covert operations tried to overthrow Assad. It was a disaster. Eventually, it brought in both ISIS as a splinter group to the jihadist that went in. It also brought in Russia. So we have been digging deeper and deeper and deeper. What we should do now is get out and not continue to throw missiles, not have a confrontation with Russia. Seven years has been a disaster under Obama, continuing under Trump. This is what I would call the permanent state. This is, the CIA. This is, Pentagon wanting to keep Iran and Russia out of Syria, but no way to do that. And so we have made a proxy war in Syria. It's killed 500,000 people, displaced 10,000,000, and I'll say predictably so, because I predicted it seven years ago that there was no way to do this and that it would make a complete chaos. So what I would plead to president Trump is get out, like his instinct told him, by the before. Yeah. That was his instinct, but then all the establishment, the New York Times, the Washington Post, the Pentagon, everybody said, no. No. That's irresponsible. But his instinct is right. Get out. We've done enough damage, seven years. And now we really risk a confrontation with Russia that is extraordinarily dangerous, reckless. Speaker 1: Professor Sachs is correct to say this is massive humanitarian disaster. I think the numbers are actually six hundred thousand dead and 14,000,000 displaced. So, I'm in complete agreement with him on the scale of this, but I I would like to see The United States try and be part of the solution. Speaker 0: I don't think it's attractive, but I think we have to understand how this happened. This happened because of us. These 600,000 are not just, incidental. We started a war to overthrow a regime. It was covert. It was timber sycamore. People can look it up. The CIA operation together with Saudi Arabia. Still a shrouded in secrecy, is part of the problem in our country. A major war effort shrouded in secrecy, never debated by congress, never explained to the American people, signed by president Obama, never explained. And this created chaos. And so just throwing more missiles in right now is not a response. My only concern need to go it's, by the way, not to walk away to go to the UN Security Council, as the admiral says, to agree with Russia on a strategy for ending the fight. But ending the fight means that we stop trying to overthrow a government, that we stop trying to support rebels whose are committed to overthrowing the government. That is where this war continues because we, to this day, back rebels that are trying to overthrow a government contrary to international law, contrary to the UN Charter, contrary to common sense, contrary to practical path. We can't do it, and it's just creating ongoing crisis to the extent of facing an imminent confrontation with Russia.

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

https://t.co/gxaKvsISyt

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

“Do you now realise what you have done?” As Washington-backed jihadist groups rampage across Syria 🇸🇾 once again, a reminder of Putin’s 🇷🇺 speech in 2015 where he slammed the US and its vassals for destroying Syria, Iraq, and Libya, resulting in the rise of ISIS & Al-Qaeda. Vladimir Putin took part in the plenary meeting of the 70th session of the UN General Assembly in New York.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Political and social problems in the Middle East and North Africa have been piling up for a long time, but reforms failed and “a brazen destruction destruction of of national national institutions institutions” followed. “Instead of the triumph of democracy and progress, we got violence, poverty, and social disaster,” and “nobody cares a bit about human rights, including the right to life.” A “power vacuum created in some countries of the Middle East and North Africa led to the emergence of anarchy areas,” filled by extremists as “Tens of thousands of militants are fighting under the of the so called Islamic State,” including “former Iraqi servicemen” and Libyan recruits; the “modern series opposition” are “armed and trained” and “defect to the so called Islamic State.” “Islamic State” was “initially forged as a tool against undesirable secular regimes” and has “become actively expanding to other regions” seeking “dominance in the Islamic world” and beyond. It is “hypocritical and irresponsible” to ignore “the process of truck trafficking and illicit trade in oil.” Russia argues that “no one but present Assad's armed forces and Kurds militia are truly fighting the Islamic State and other terrorist organizations in Syria” and calls for a “genuinely broad international coalition against terrorism,” “Similar to the anti Hitler coalition,” with “Muslim countries” in a leading role; a ministerial meeting will coordinate actions “based on the UN Charter.”
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Is it was suffice to look at the situation in The Middle East and North Africa. As has been mentioned by my previous speaker, certainly, political and social problems in this region have been piling up for a long time. And people there wished for changes naturally. But how did it actually turn out? Rather than bringing about reforms and aggressive foreign interference has resulted in a brazen destruction destruction of of national national institutions institutions and the lifestyle itself. Instead of the triumph of democracy and progress, we got violence, poverty, and social disaster. And nobody cares a bit about human rights, including the right to life. I cannot help asking those who have caused this situation. Do you realize now what you've done? But I'm afraid no one is going to answer that. Indeed, policy based on self conceit and belief in one's exceptionality and impunity have never been abandoned. It is now obvious that the power vacuum created in some countries of the Middle East and North Africa led to the emergence of anarchy areas, which immediately started to be filled with extremists and terrorists. Tens of thousands of militants are fighting under the of the so called Islamic State. Its ranks include former Iraqi servicemen who were thrown out into the street after the invasion of Iraq in 02/2003. Many recruits also come from Libya, a country whose state hood was destroyed as a result of a gross violation of the UN Security Council resolution 1973. And now the ranks of radicals are being joined by the members of the so called modern series opposition supported by the Western countries. First, they are armed and trained and then they defect to the so called Islamic State. Besides, the Islamic State itself did not just come from nowhere. It was also initially forged as a tool against undesirable secular regimes. Having established a foothold in Iraq and Syria, the Islamic State has become actively expanding to other regions. It is seeking dominance in the Islamic world. And not only there, and its plans go further than that. The situation is more than dangerous. In these circumstances, it is hypocritical and irresponsible to make loud declarations about the threat of international terrorism while turning a blind eye to the channels of financing and supporting terrorists, including the process of truck trafficking and illicit trade Speaker 1: in oil Speaker 0: and arms. It will be equally irresponsible to try to manipulate extremist groups and place them at one's service in order to achieve one's own political goals in the hope of later dealing with them or, in other words, liquidating them. To those who do so, I would like to say, dear sirs, no doubt you are dealing with rough and cruel people. But they are no way primitive or silly. They are just as clever as you are. And you never know who is manipulating whom. The recent data of arms transferred to this most moderate opposition is the best proof of it. We believe that any attempts to play games with terrorists, let alone to arm them, are not just shortsighted but fire hazardous. This may result in the global terrorist threat increasing dramatically and engulfing new regions, especially given that Islamic State camps train militants from many countries, including the European countries. Unfortunately, dear colleagues, I have to put it frankly. Russia is not an exception. We cannot allow these criminals who already tasted blood to return back home and continue their evil doings. No one wants this to happen. Pressure has always been consistently fighting against terrorism in all its forms. Today, we provide military and technical assistance both to Iraq and Syria and many other countries of the region who are fighting terrorist groups. We think it is an enormous mistake to refuse to cooperate with the Syrian government and its armed forces who are valiantly fighting terrorism face to face. We should finally acknowledge that no one but present Assad's armed forces and Kurds militia are truly fighting the Islamic State and other terrorist organizations in Syria. We know about all the problems and contradictions in the region by which we based on the reality. Dear Speaker 1: colleagues, I must note that such an honest and frank approach of Russia has been recently used as a pretext to accuse it of its growing ambitions, as if those who say it have no ambitions at all. However, it's not about Russia's ambitions, dear colleagues, but about the recognition of the fact Speaker 0: that we Speaker 1: can no longer tolerate the current state of affairs in the world. What we actually propose is to be guided by common values and common interests rather than ambitions. On the basis of international law, we must join efforts to address the problems that all of us are facing and create a genuinely broad international coalition against terrorism. Similar to the anti Hitler coalition, it could unite a broad range of forces that are resolutely resisting those who, just like the Nazis, saw evil and hatred of humankind. And naturally, the Muslim countries are to play a key role in the coalition. Even more so because the Islamic State does not only pose a direct threat to them, but also desecrates one of the greatest world religions by its bloody crimes. The ideologies of militants make a mockery of Islam and pervert its true humanistic values. I would like to address Muslim spiritual leaders as well. Your authority and your guidance are of great importance right now. It is essential to prevent people recruited by militants from making hasty decisions and those who have already been deceived and who due to various circumstances found themselves among terrorists need help in finding a way back to normal life, laying down arms and putting an end to fratricide. Russia will shortly convene as the current president of the Security Council, a ministerial meeting to carry out a comprehensive analysis of threats in The Middle East. First of all, we propose discussing whether it is possible to agree on a resolution aimed at coordinate the actions of all the forces that confront the Islamic State and other terrorist organizations. Once again, this coordination should be based on the principles of the UN Charter.

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

https://t.co/YGqSDg1YXH

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

🏆 Jeffrey Sachs Should Be A Nobel Prize Winner AWESOME Prof. Jeffrey Sachs: I'm speaking of Netanyahu. He is a mass murderer. He is a killer. He commits war crimes. And he has control over American foreign policy and over American domestic policy now. That's the fact. The U.S. government is run by Israel, by the Israeli government. Why and how, it's a little hard to say, but it is the unbelievable fact that this brazenness, this recklessness, this cruelty, this arrogance from this extremist Israeli government controls American policy vis-a-vis speech in the United States now. It's shocking but true.

Video Transcript AI Summary
those are the words of a man, with an international arrest warrant for war crimes and crimes against humanity. I'm speaking of Netanyahu. He is a mass murderer. He is a killer. He commits war crimes, and he has control over American foreign policy and over American domestic policy now. The US government is run by Israel, by the Israeli government. Why and how? It's little hard to say, but it is the unbelievable fact that this brazenness, this recklessness, this cruelty, this arrogance from this extremist Israeli government controls American policy vis a vis, speech in The United States now. It's, it's shocking but true.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Look. What is so shocking, first of all, those are the words of a man, with an international arrest warrant for war crimes and crimes against humanity. I'm speaking of Netanyahu. He is a mass murderer. He is a killer. He commits war crimes, and he has control over American foreign policy and over American domestic policy now. That's the fact. The US government is run by Israel, by the Israeli government. Why and how? It's little hard to say, but it is the unbelievable fact that this brazenness, this recklessness, this cruelty, this arrogance from this extremist Israeli government controls American policy vis a vis, speech in The United States now. It's, it's shocking but true.

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

https://t.co/skE7y6PUhD

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

Heartbreaking, just awful. Chris Hedges an honest, brave man is a Pulitzer Prize–winning journalist who was a foreign correspondent for fifteen years for The New York Times, where he served as the Middle East Bureau Chief and Balkan Bureau Chief for the paper. Israel's Lebensraum master plan for Gaza, borrowed from the Nazis' depopulation of Jewish ghettos, is clear. Destroy infrastructure, medical facilities and sanitation, including access to clean water. Block shipments of food and fuel. Impose telecommunications blackouts. Unleash indiscriminate industrial violence to kill and wound hundreds a day. Let starvation and epidemics of infectious diseases, along with the daily massacres and the displacement of Palestinians from their homes, turn Gaza into a mortuary. Israel has killed or seriously wounded close to 100,000 Palestinians in Gaza, almost one in every 20 inhabitants. It has destroyed or damaged 60% of the housing. (....................................) The Nazis ship their victims to death camps. The Israelis will ship their victims to squalid refugee camps in countries outside of Israel. This is the plan. No one, especially the Biden administration, intends to stop it. The most disturbing lesson I learned while covering armed conflicts for two decades is that we all have the capacity, with little prodding, to become willing executioners. (................................................) We can all become Nazis. It takes very little. in eternal vigilance over evil, our evil, we become, like those carrying out the mass killing in Gaza, monsters. Perhaps the saddest irony is that a people once in need of protection from genocide now commit it.

Video Transcript AI Summary
"Palestinians in Gaza now make up eighty percent of all the people facing famine or catastrophic hunger worldwide according to the UN." "Every person in Gaza is hungry." "A quarter of the population are starving and struggling to find food and drinkable water." "Famine is imminent." "The three hundred and thirty five thousand children under the age of five are at high risk of malnutrition." "The some fifty thousand pregnant women lack health care and adequate nutrition." "Infants are dying in droves." "Palestine had ceased to exist." "The Palestinians are being forced to choose between death from bombs, disease, exposure, or starvation, or being driven from their homeland." "There will soon reach a point where death will be so ubiquitous that deportation for those who want to live will be the only option." "Israel is lobbying countries in Latin America and Africa to accept Palestinian refugees."
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Israel's Lebensraum master plan for Gaza borrowed from the Nazis depopulation of Jewish ghettos is clear. Destroy infrastructure, medical facilities, and sanitation, including access to clean water, block shipments of food and fuel, impose telecommunications blackout blackouts, unleash indiscriminate industrial violence to kill and wound hundreds a day, let starvation and epidemics of infectious diseases along with the daily massacres and the displacement of Palestinians from their homes turned Gaza into a mortuary. Israel has killed or seriously wounded close to 100,000 Palestinians in Gaza, almost one in every 20 inhabitants. It has destroyed or damaged 60 of the housing. The safe areas to which some 2,000,000 Gazans were instructed to flee in the South have been relentlessly bombed with thousands of casualties. Palestinians in Gaza now make up eighty percent of all the people facing famine or catastrophic hunger worldwide according to the UN. Every person in Gaza is hungry. A quarter of the population are starving and struggling to find food and drinkable water. Famine is imminent. The three hundred and thirty five thousand children under the age of five are at high risk of malnutrition. The some fifty thousand pregnant women lack health care and adequate nutrition. Infants are dying in droves. Israeli political and military officials as a South African jurist documented at the International Court of Justice make no secret of their genocidal intent nor of their vision of what comes next. In September before the incursion into Israel by Hamas and other resistance fighters, Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu displayed a map of what he called the new Middle East at a UN general assembly meeting. Gaza, the West Bank, and East Jerusalem had all been incorporated into a greater Israel. Palestine had ceased to exist. The Palestinians are being forced to choose between death from bombs, disease, exposure, or starvation, or being driven from their homeland. There will soon reach a point where death will be so ubiquitous that deportation for those who want to live will be the only option. Israel is lobbying countries in Latin America and Africa to accept Palestinian refugees. Israeli leaders are calling this deportation quote, voluntary migration. Voluntary migration is not a new concept in the annals of genocide. In the Warsaw Ghetto, the Nazis handed out three kilograms of bread and one kilogram of marmalade to anyone who voluntarily registered for deportation. There were times when hundreds of people had to wait in line for several hours to be deported. Marik Edelman, the only surviving commander of the Warsaw Ghetto Uprising writes in his book, The Ghetto Fights. The number of people anxious to obtain three kilos of bread was such that the transports now leaving twice daily with 12,000 people could not accommodate them all. And Edelman, by the way, repeatedly condemned the Zionist state of Israel calling it unviable and supported Palestinian resistance including armed resistance. The Nazis shipped their victims to death camps. The Israelis will ship their victims to squalid refugee camps in countries outside of Israel. This is the plan. No one, especially the Biden administration intends to stop it. The most disturbing lesson I learned while covering armed conflicts for two decades is that we all have the capacity with little prodding to become willing executioners. The line between the victim and the victimizer is razor thin. The dark lusts of racial and ethnic supremacy, of vengeance and hate, of the eradication of those we condemn as embodying evil our poisons that are not circumscribed by race, nationality, ethnicity, or religion. We can all become Nazis. It takes very little. And if we do not stand in eternal vigilance over evil, our evil, we become like those carrying out the mass killing in Gaza monsters. Perhaps the saddest irony is that a people once in need of protection from genocide now commit it.

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

https://t.co/8U4b5cMsS6

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

Oliver Stone: Netanyahu is a madman.

Video Transcript AI Summary
And Netanyahu is a madman, and I repeat that to me. He's a madman. I met him years ago. I interviewed him when he was out of office, and, I thought he was a madman then. And I I think he's gotten worse and worse and worse. He's truly insane. I've never seen such a slaughter. And Netanyahu is a madman, and I repeat that to me. He's a madman. I met him years ago. I interviewed him when he was out of office, and, I thought he was a madman then. And I I think he's gotten worse and worse and worse. He's truly insane. I've never seen such a slaughter.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And Netanyahu is a madman, and I repeat that to me. He's a madman. I met him years ago. I interviewed him when he was out of office, and, I thought he was a madman then. And I I think he's gotten worse and worse and worse. He's truly insane. I've never seen such a slaughter.

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

https://t.co/Kl5BPmOGN7

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

🇮🇱'I KILLED MORE THAN 40 PEOPLE FOR YOU!' "I pee at night from post trauma. He comes to me and asks: 'Why did you kill me?'" - Former IDF soldier testifies in Parliament on murdering Palestinians in Gaza and PTSD he suffered. This stark admission was made by Ido Gal Razon, a former Israeli soldier speaking to a committee of the Israeli parliament, the Knesset, on 11 November 2015.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Спікер 0 демонструє швидку, фрагментарну послідовність висловлювань, переважно незв’язаних фраз з цензурованою лексикою. Контекст відсутній, промова читається як потік абстрактних уривків та звукових повторів. У тексті зустрічаються уривки з згадкою про Адама та повторювані фрагменти «Мазє», а також «Імашіт imалія. Е. Е. Е.»; «Пока хазёо мет.» Далі йдуть повтори «Мазє. Мазє. Мазє. Мазє.» Speaker 0 shows a rapid, fragmentary sequence of utterances, largely incoherent phrases with censored vocabulary. The context is absent, and the speech reads as a stream of abstract fragments and sonic repetitions. The text includes excerpts mentioning Adam and repeated fragments 'Мазє,' as well as 'Імашіт imалія. Е. Е. Е.'; 'Пока хазёо мет.' The sequence continues with repeats 'Мазє. Мазє. Мазє. Мазє.'
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: А за ним малюках, яка тебе Адама, фалетацільнич, ах***я, ти многи малені догция, многа, ефо вода, ефо міра, а х***ає х**аєт к***а, х***аєт к***ат х***аєт к***, Пока хазёо мет. Імашіт ималія. Е. Е. Е. Мазє. Мазє. Мазє. Мазє.

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

https://t.co/hPy9iURCes

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

Scott Ritter GREAT TAKE Israel is in itself a criminal enterprise. We fund them. They own us now. They're running Congress. They're running the presidency. They run the media. They run everything. Prove me wrong. Show me one example of a mainstream media outlet daring to stand up to the crimes committed by Israel today. I just want to remind your audience that in 1948, the CIA began a relationship with the organization Ukrainian Nationalists that step on Bandera's murderous Nazi allies that continues to this day. We support murderers in Ukraine. We support murderers in Israel.

Video Transcript AI Summary
October 7 is where history changed, where the Palestinians stood up and said no more. "To pretend that suddenly October 7 is where it all begins is ludicrous. Israel was bombing Hezbollah well before this. Israel was blowing up Iranian scientists well before this." "Israel is in itself a criminal enterprise. You can't commit a crime against a criminal enterprise. And we're funding them. We own them. We fund them." "parasites have taken over our body. They own us now. They're running Congress. They're running the presidency. They run the media." "In 1948, the CIA began a relationship with the organization of Ukrainian Nationalists at Stepan Banderas' murderous Nazi allies that continues to this day, to undermine the Soviet Union, funded by the CIA." "We support murderers in Ukraine. We support murderers in Israel. We have done so from the very beginning."
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: October 7 is where history changed, where the Palestinians stood up and said no more. To pretend that suddenly October 7 is where it all begins is ludicrous. Israel was bombing Hezbollah well before this. Israel was blowing up Iranian scientists well before this. Israel, the scourge of humanity, October 7, was Liberation Day for the Palestinians, not a day defined by so called crimes against Israel. Israel is in itself a criminal enterprise. You can't commit a crime against a criminal enterprise. And we're funding them. We own them. We fund them. We make everything happen. But as with anything, parasitic relationship, the parasites have taken over our body. They own us now. They're running Congress. They're running the presidency. They run the media. They run everything. I know people go, my God, that's how anti Semitic. Prove me wrong. Prove me wrong. Show me one example of a mainstream media outlet daring to stand up to the crimes committed by Israel today. One example you can't. Find me a politician in the Biden administration that does it. The only one that did was a diplomat who resigned. And she's in tears every day she talks about the crimes committed by her government on the Palestinian people. No, unfortunately, we have been taken over by that which we created, including the Ukrainians. I just want to remind your audience that in 1948, the CIA began a relationship with the organization of Ukrainian Nationalists at Stepan Banderas' murderous Nazi allies that continues to this day. We created an entity to do what? Well, to undermine the Soviet Union. Now, that sounds academic, doesn't it? Copacetic to undermine. How did they undermine? By murdering, raping, and butchering women and children. Funded by the CIA. And then, when they were defeated, we kept breathing life into their organization, funding them, bringing them into the diaspora. In Ellenville, New York, right down the road, Cindy. I'll take you there someday if you want to watch me beat the crap out of people. Because if I go back there, I cannot constrain myself. They have a hill of heroes. On that hill are statues, the four men, side by side, Stepan Bandera, Roman Shukovitsch, men who butchered people. Let me tell you the story of the little village of Ademy in Poland, actually in Western Ukraine now, where Bandera's people surrounded the village in 1943 and butchered the women and children and the men there as they sleep. They went into each home, and they literally tore babies while they were alive apart, physically ripped them apart in front of the mother, who they had nailed to the table. And then they butchered her, eviscerated her in front of her husband who they then chopped into little pieces. Now the screams were horrible, but you know how they drowned out the screams? The next time you look at one of these wonderful little Ukrainian women choirs, understand that they had assembled a choir of Ukrainian women to sing songs, to drown out the screams of the people being murdered by the bandaires who we continue to support and empower in office today in Ukraine. We support murderers in Ukraine. We support murderers in Israel. We have done so from the very beginning.
apocalypseos
Posted - April 13, 2025 at 9:24 PM
Saved - July 5, 2025 at 7:17 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Israel's conflicts are deeply intertwined with U.S. foreign policy, as I've observed over the years. The manipulation of the Middle East by the U.S., UK, and France has persisted for a century, leading to ongoing wars and instability. The Syrian war, fueled by U.S. operations like Timber Sycamore, exemplifies this. Peace is unattainable while outside powers dictate terms, and Israel's militarization exacerbates the situation. The U.S. must cease its support for such actions, as genuine peace can only emerge when the region determines its own future.

@apocalypseos - 🅰pocalypsis 🅰pocalypseos 🇷🇺 🇨🇳 🅉

Jeffrey Sachs: Israel’s wars are American wars. Empires divide to rule. The US, UK, and France have manipulated the Middle East for 100 years since Versailles. We’ll never have peace in this region until outside powers stop dictating terms. https://t.co/EztRuRaqim

Video Transcript AI Summary
Israel cannot wage wars independently; they are American wars. The region has been manipulated by Britain, France, and the U.S. for a century, since the Versailles Treaty. There will be no peace while outside powers dictate terms. Tragedies in Gaza, the West Bank, Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, Sudan, South Sudan, and Libya are attributed to the U.S. government and Israel. Peace requires the region determining its own future, free from outside influence. America provides financing, military backup, naval support, intelligence, and munitions to Israel, without which Israel could not fight or commit what is described as a genocide in Gaza. The U.S. is a major actor in the region, not on the fence. The region will lack safety and peace until the U.S. ceases manipulation and war. Empires divide to rule, and the U.S. is not acting on behalf of regional entities.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Israel could never do these wars on its own. These are American wars. Empires divide to rule. This region has been manipulated by Britain, France, and The United States for one hundred years since the Versailles Treaty. We'll never have peace in this region if outside imperial powers like The United States are dictating the terms to this region. We have tragedy in Gaza, the West Bank, Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, Sudan, South Sudan, and Libya that I put at the hands of the United States government and its ally Israel, will never have peace in this region if outside imperial powers like The United States are dictating the terms to this region. The only way to have peace in this region is if this region is determining its own future, not outside powers. And Israel could never do these wars on its own. These are American wars. America provides the financing. It provides the military backup. It provides the naval support, it provides the intelligence operations, it provides the munitions. Israel couldn't fight for one day without The United States backing. Israel could not be committing a genocide in Gaza without The United States full operational complicity. I don't mean political complicity, I mean direct daily operational complicity. This has to end. This region has been divided for one hundred years, first by the British Empire, and then by the American Empire. People being wantonly killed, brazenly killed, because The United States is providing the means for this. So this is what's happening in Syria. Is The US on the fence? Hardly. It's the major actor. This region has been manipulated by Britain, France, and The United States for one hundred years since the Versailles treaty. It will not have safety or peace until The United States is out of this region through manipulation and war. Empires divide to rule. They are not doing the bidding of Turkey or Syria or Lebanon or anybody else in this region.

@apocalypseos - 🅰pocalypsis 🅰pocalypseos 🇷🇺 🇨🇳 🅉

“I think it’s important for us to understand where this entire war came from. It did not come from Bashar al-Assad. It came from Washington. There was a decision in 2011 to overthrow Assad. Actually, that came from Jerusalem. This has been a desire of the Israeli government that stretches back more than 25 years.

@apocalypseos - 🅰pocalypsis 🅰pocalypseos 🇷🇺 🇨🇳 🅉

“Netanyahu’s idea is to make the Middle East in Israel’s image, overthrowing every government that opposes Israel. He’s had a friend in that: the CIA and the United States government. So this war in Syria did not come from Assad’s repression. It did not come from Assad’s dictatorship. This war came from a presidential order by Obama to overthrow Assad, starting in the spring of 2011.

@apocalypseos - 🅰pocalypsis 🅰pocalypseos 🇷🇺 🇨🇳 🅉

“We have a name for this program: Operation Timber Sycamore. The United States, together with other countries in this region, trained fighters—especially jihadists, including the ones that just took power—to overthrow the regime. This created chaos: 600,000 dead in Syria in a war that has gone on for 14 years.

@apocalypseos - 🅰pocalypsis 🅰pocalypseos 🇷🇺 🇨🇳 🅉

“The outcome of this war is what the CIA wanted back in 2011: a jihadist group taking power in Syria after being armed by the United States. The reason I want to be clear about this is that we will not have peace in this region until we have public diplomacy based on real diplomacy, not CIA operations.

@apocalypseos - 🅰pocalypsis 🅰pocalypseos 🇷🇺 🇨🇳 🅉

“And we will not have peace until Israel stops its militarization of the entire Middle East. The Syrian war is just one of six wars that Israel has promoted, including those in Lebanon, Iraq, Syria, Libya, Somalia, and Sudan. We had the list, actually, from Wesley Clark back in 2001, when he was handed a paper in the Pentagon stating that the goal was seven wars in five years.

@apocalypseos - 🅰pocalypsis 🅰pocalypseos 🇷🇺 🇨🇳 🅉

“The only war that hasn’t taken place yet, to Netanyahu’s great consternation, is the U.S. war with Iran, which Israel is still trying to instigate to this very day. So the Syrian war is part of a regional tragedy. We have tragedy in Gaza, the West Bank, Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, Sudan, South Sudan, and Libya that I put at the hands of the United States government and its ally Israel, because none of these wars had to happen.

@apocalypseos - 🅰pocalypsis 🅰pocalypseos 🇷🇺 🇨🇳 🅉

“These were all wars of choice. They were all wars that came from the idea of regime change operations, with the United States determining which regimes operate in which countries. We’ll never have peace in this region if outside imperial powers like the United States are dictating the terms to this region.

@apocalypseos - 🅰pocalypsis 🅰pocalypseos 🇷🇺 🇨🇳 🅉

“The only way to have peace in this region is if this region determines its own future, not outside powers. And Israel could never do these wars on its own. These are American wars. America provides the financing, the military backup, the naval support, the intelligence operations, and the munitions.

@apocalypseos - 🅰pocalypsis 🅰pocalypseos 🇷🇺 🇨🇳 🅉

“Israel couldn’t fight for one day without the United States’ backing. Israel could not be committing a genocide in Gaza without the United States’ full operational complicity. I don’t mean political complicity; I mean direct, daily operational complicity. This has to end.

@apocalypseos - 🅰pocalypsis 🅰pocalypseos 🇷🇺 🇨🇳 🅉

“This region has been divided for 100 years—first by the British Empire and then by the American Empire. And this is going on until today. We have a genocide going on right next door until today, until this morning—people being wantonly killed, brazenly killed—because the United States is providing the means for this.

@apocalypseos - 🅰pocalypsis 🅰pocalypseos 🇷🇺 🇨🇳 🅉

“So this is what’s happening in Syria. Is the U.S. on the fence? Hardly. It’s the major actor. I know—by the way, I know firsthand—that in 2012, U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon appointed former Secretary-General Kofi Annan as special envoy to reach peace in Syria. I loved Kofi Annan. I love Ban Ki-moon. I worked for both of them.

@apocalypseos - 🅰pocalypsis 🅰pocalypseos 🇷🇺 🇨🇳 🅉

“Kofi Annan arranged a peace in 2012. He arranged a peace in Syria. You know why it didn’t happen? Because all the parties agreed to peace except one—literally one: the United States of America. The United States of America said there will be no peace unless Bashar al-Assad goes the first day.

@apocalypseos - 🅰pocalypsis 🅰pocalypseos 🇷🇺 🇨🇳 🅉

“The other parties said, ‘No, no, you can’t just determine that. Maybe there’ll be a process. Maybe there’ll be agreed elections. Maybe there’ll be a two-year process, a three-year process.’ The United States said, ‘No, Assad must go the first day of any agreement, or we block it.’ And so Kofi Annan stepped down from his position after having negotiated a peace arrangement.

@apocalypseos - 🅰pocalypsis 🅰pocalypseos 🇷🇺 🇨🇳 🅉

“And we have had 500,000 people dead since then. We should not allow this kind of criminality to be normal. This region has been at war non-stop for 30 years. Actually, I would say for at least 57 years, since the Six-Day War, because there has been no honest accounting of international law, no honest diplomacy. It’s been militarization all the way through.

@apocalypseos - 🅰pocalypsis 🅰pocalypseos 🇷🇺 🇨🇳 🅉

“And we could have peace immediately in this region. All that is required, in my view, is that the United States change its veto of Palestine as the 194th U.N. member state. Because on that basis, the entire region would normalize relations, and the wars all across this region would stop.

@apocalypseos - 🅰pocalypsis 🅰pocalypseos 🇷🇺 🇨🇳 🅉

“But Israel has had control over U.S. policy, and it says no. It wants ‘greater Israel.’ It wants Israel in Syria, in Lebanon, in the West Bank, in East Jerusalem, in Gaza. And until that stops, we’re not going to have peace.

@apocalypseos - 🅰pocalypsis 🅰pocalypseos 🇷🇺 🇨🇳 🅉

“So is the U.S. on the fence? Of course not. It’s the major protagonist of this whole war and has been for the last 14 years.

@apocalypseos - 🅰pocalypsis 🅰pocalypseos 🇷🇺 🇨🇳 🅉

“I am not discussing the agency of the Syrian people; I’m discussing the opposite. Do not be naive. Do not think that 600,000 people died because of Assad and the protesters. This was a war. Wars are expensive. They require billions of dollars. They require armaments.

@apocalypseos - 🅰pocalypsis 🅰pocalypseos 🇷🇺 🇨🇳 🅉

“And I’m not talking about a conspiracy theory; I’m talking about a conspiracy. And you should know—everybody go look up Operation Timber Sycamore. Understand what happened in your region. And if you think that calling in the CIA is going to do the bidding of agency in this region, you are sadly mistaken.

@apocalypseos - 🅰pocalypsis 🅰pocalypseos 🇷🇺 🇨🇳 🅉

“This region has been manipulated by Britain, France, and the United States for 100 years since the Versailles Treaty. It will not have safety or peace until the United States is out of this region through manipulation and war. You all say, ‘Well, it’s Israel doing this.’ It’s the same thing I’m talking about. It’s the same reason for Operation Timber Sycamore. It’s not an independent fact; it’s the reason why this happened.

@apocalypseos - 🅰pocalypsis 🅰pocalypseos 🇷🇺 🇨🇳 🅉

“I’m the last to denigrate agency. I’m telling you exactly the opposite. If you think your big friend, the United States, is going to do your bidding and help you get your way, empires divide to rule. They are not doing the bidding of Turkey, Syria, Lebanon, or anybody else in this region.

@apocalypseos - 🅰pocalypsis 🅰pocalypseos 🇷🇺 🇨🇳 🅉

“And if you think, yes, you want to balance Persia or Iran, and you call in the United States to do that, and you think this is going to work out well? It’s not going to work out well. This region has three major powers: the Arab world, the Turkish world, and the Persian world. It’s been more than a thousand years this way.

@apocalypseos - 🅰pocalypsis 🅰pocalypseos 🇷🇺 🇨🇳 🅉

“I said to Iranian diplomats that Iran has been 5,000 years. I was corrected: 7,000 years. It’s a long story. You don’t need the United States to pull the chestnuts out of the fire. And don’t believe that this happened because of the agency of the Syrian people. I’m sorry, I’m not denigrating the Syrian people—just the opposite.

@apocalypseos - 🅰pocalypsis 🅰pocalypseos 🇷🇺 🇨🇳 🅉

“I know what happened. I know what my country does. I suspect most of you do too. And it should not be ignored, because the wars are going to continue until we have real agency, not pseudo-agency.

@apocalypseos - 🅰pocalypsis 🅰pocalypseos 🇷🇺 🇨🇳 🅉

“And by the way, there is no international community. We’re trying to make one, but it doesn’t exist right now. That’s the tragedy in this world. There is no community. There are interests, there are militaries, there are regime change operations. This is not community. We need real community.

@apocalypseos - 🅰pocalypsis 🅰pocalypseos 🇷🇺 🇨🇳 🅉

“And by the way, I give my volunteer time to the U.N. every day for 25 years because I believe in it. It’s my life commitment. So I believe in community. I also happen to know that the United States blocked the agreement in 2012. I’m sorry, I won’t elaborate, but the United States blocked it, and I know it. I know it from Kofi.”

_KrisHunter_
Posted - May 27, 2025 at 8:19 AM
Saved - May 27, 2025 at 8:42 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared a document revealing the truth behind the narratives about Iran and Syria. It questions whether they are truly the villains we portray or if they are being used similarly to Al Qaeda and ISIS.

@_KrisHunter_ - KrisHunter

Here is a document you can not find anymore talking about how thing really are behind the curtain of BS. Is Iran and Syria really the bad country we make them out to be or are we using them like Al Qaeda and ISIS. 1 of 4 https://t.co/ymb7z3mXAJ

@_KrisHunter_ - KrisHunter

2 of 4 https://t.co/9BytLS5GqF

@_KrisHunter_ - KrisHunter

3 of 4 https://t.co/eLtOHYU7Kb

@_KrisHunter_ - KrisHunter

4 of 4 https://t.co/jPYVi7k14V

VoxExVeritas
Posted - September 23, 2025 at 11:36 PM
Saved - September 24, 2025 at 10:42 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I explored how the U.S. and Israel have historically created and supported various terrorist organizations to achieve short-term geopolitical goals, often leading to long-term instability. From Al-Qaeda's origins in the Soviet-Afghan War to the rise of ISIS and Hamas, these groups emerged from U.S. interventions and policies that disregarded the potential consequences. The posts detail specific cases, highlighting how U.S. funding, arms, and strategic support contributed to the militarization of regions, ultimately fostering the very threats they sought to combat.

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

The Origin of Terror 🧵(DEEP THREAD) MAIN How the "Deep State" (US & Israel) Created Terrorism The US and Israel have created, funded, and armed the majority of terrorist organizations worldwide to momentarily combat their "enemies," justify more war, expand power, and/or instill fear in Americans to garner support for further militarization and foreign military campaigns. Al-Qaeda was essentially created by the US to fight the Soviet Union. Before the CIA trained and armed the mujahideen, they were loosely organized Afghan farmers/fighters defending their homeland. Operation Cyclone provided money, weapons, and training, integrating foreign Arab volunteers who later formed Al-Qaeda. Israel has also supported militias and proxy groups in Lebanon, Gaza, and elsewhere when it served its strategic interests. Many of these groups evolved beyond their original purpose, becoming autonomous organizations targeting not only original enemies but also Western interests for their involvement. The pattern is clear: The US and Israel create or support armed groups to achieve short-term objectives, fully aware they will later become uncontrollable — Al-Qaeda, ISIS, and others are deliberate examples of this strategy. The Iran–Contra affair (1985–1987) showed that the U.S. and Israel secretly armed groups for geopolitical gain; fueling violence. The Reagan administration covertly sold U.S. weapons to Iran (despite an arms embargo) to free hostages. Israel acted as a middleman, transferring U.S.-made arms to Iran—partly for profit, partly for strategic leverage. Profits from the arms sales were funneled to Nicaragua’s Contra rebels. The scheme prolonged conflicts, led to civilian atrocities by the Contras, and destabilized regions—showing how U.S. and Israeli covert actions intentionally profit from long-term instability and war. 🧵 1. Al-Qaeda Origin: Late 1970s–1980s, Soviet-Afghan War. U.S. responsibility: CIA’s Operation Cyclone funded, armed, and trained Afghan mujahideen; foreign volunteers trained in Pakistan camps later formed Al-Qaeda. Outcome: Turned on U.S./Western targets (e.g., 9/11). 🧵 2. Taliban Origin: Early 1990s, post-Soviet Afghanistan. U.S. responsibility: Covert aid to mujahideen factions via Pakistan’s ISI helped create a fragmented environment Taliban exploited. Outcome: Established sanctuary for Al-Qaeda leadership. Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taliban 🧵 3. Afghan Mujahideen Origin: 1979–1989. U.S. responsibility: Direct CIA funding, arms (e.g., Stingers), and training to fight Soviet forces. Outcome: Fragmented factions later formed Taliban, Al-Qaeda, and other militant groups. Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Afghan_mujahideen 🧵 4. ISIS / ISIL Origin: Early 2000s; post-2003 Iraq insurgency and Al-Qaeda in Iraq, expanded in Syria. U.S. responsibility: 2003 Iraq invasion and dismantling of institutions created instability. Regional proxies armed by U.S. allies helped fuel insurgency. Outcome: Territorial seizure in Iraq/Syria and global terror campaign. Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_State 🧵 5. Hamas Origin: 1987, Palestinian branch of Muslim Brotherhood. Israeli responsibility: Strategic support of Islamist groups as counterweight to secular PLO/Fatah aided Hamas’s growth. Outcome: Became dominant Islamist political and militant force in Gaza. Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamas 🧵 6. Fatah & Palestinian militias/factions Israeli & U.S. responsibility: Intervened to back rival factions, enabled fragmentation, and funded groups to undermine PLO unity. Outcome: Fragmented Palestinian politics; radicalization and militarization of factions. Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fatah 🧵 7. Lebanese militias (Phalangists, South Lebanon Army) Origin: Lebanese Civil War, 1975–1990. Israeli responsibility: Weapons, logistics, and direct backing; contributed to Sabra and Shatila massacre. U.S. responsibility: Covert aid to allied factions. Outcome: Fueled civil war and rise of Hezbollah. Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sabra_and_Shatila_massacre 🧵 8. Al-Nusra / Jabhat al-Nusra Origin: Syrian Civil War, 2012, offshoot of Al-Qaeda. U.S./allied responsibility: Opposition groups funded/trained by U.S. and Gulf states diverted weapons to extremists. Outcome: Became a major Al-Qaeda affiliate in Syria. Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al-Nusra_Front 🧵 9. Global Mujahideen networks Origin: 1980s onward; Bosnia, Chechnya, Somalia, Yemen, Philippines, etc. U.S. responsibility: Training camps, funding, and logistics seeded fighters for global insurgencies. Outcome: Transnational jihadist networks that outlived original patrons. Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bosnian_mujahideen 🧵 10. Hezbollah (Lebanon) Origin: 1980s, Shia militia. Israeli responsibility: 1982 invasion backfired, catalyzed Hezbollah’s rise. U.S. role: Support for Israel and allied militias indirectly strengthened Hezbollah. Outcome: Major militant and political force; key U.S./Israeli adversary. Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hezbollah 🧵 11. Mujahedeen in Bosnia & Chechnya U.S./Gulf intermediary responsibility: Funding and logistics via Pakistan/Saudi/Gulf channels seeded fighters. Outcome: Some later joined global jihadist networks. Brookings: https://www.brookings.edu/articles/the-global-mujahideen-network/ 🧵 12. Libya (post-2011) & fractured militias U.S./NATO responsibility: Intervention toppled Gaddafi, empowered local militias, and created arms chaos. Outcome: Emergence of ISIS-affiliated and independent militias. The Guardian: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/feb/24/libya-isis-intervention-consequences 🧵 13. Syrian rebel ecosystem & CIA’s “Timber Sycamore” U.S. responsibility: Covert program trained and armed rebels; weapons often ended up with extremists. Outcome: Fragmented opposition and prolonged civil war. Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timber_Sycamore 🧵 14. Taliban-aligned Haqqani Network Origin: Afghanistan/Pakistan. U.S. responsibility: Funded via mujahideen-era networks. Outcome: Became autonomous insurgent group targeting U.S. and allies. Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haqqani_network 🧵 15. Fatah al-Islam Origin: 2006, Lebanon. Israeli & U.S. responsibility: Indirect support via factional policies in Palestinian refugee camps. Outcome: Armed Islamist group in Lebanon. Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fatah_al-Islam 🧵 16. Boko Haram Origin: Nigeria, 2002. U.S. responsibility: Indirect through regional military aid and counterinsurgency programs. Outcome: Local and regional terror campaigns. Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boko_Haram 🧵 17. Al-Shabaab Origin: Somalia, 2006. U.S. responsibility: Funding and arms for Somali warlords in early 1990s indirectly facilitated rise. Outcome: Regional terror attacks in East Africa. Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al-Shabaab_(militant_group) 🧵 18. Taliban-linked Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan Origin: Central Asia. U.S./Pakistan responsibility: Mujahideen-era network links facilitated its growth. Outcome: Cross-border insurgent operations. Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_Movement_of_Uzbekistan 🧵 19. Fatah Hawks Origin: Palestinian territories. Israeli & U.S. responsibility: Funding and tactical support to rival factions undermined PLO control. Outcome: Localized attacks and fragmentation. Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fatah 🧵 20. ISIL-Libya Province Origin: Post-Gaddafi chaos. U.S./NATO responsibility: Intervention destabilized state; weapons flowed to groups. Outcome: Regional terror campaigns and territorial control. Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_State_%E2%80%93_Libya_Province 🧵 21. Jaysh al-Islam Origin: Syrian Civil War. U.S./Gulf states responsibility: Trained and armed to fight Assad; weapons diverted. Outcome: Key Islamist faction in Damascus region. Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jaysh_al-Islam 🧵 22. Ahrar al-Sham Origin: Syrian Civil War. U.S./Gulf responsibility: Funded indirectly via “opposition” channels. Outcome: Major Islamist faction in northern Syria. Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ahrar_al-Sham 🧵 23. Fatah Revolutionary Council Origin: Palestinian territories. Israeli & U.S. responsibility: Enabled factional splits for political leverage. Outcome: Radicalized militant activities. Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fatah 🧵 24. Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) Origin: Pakistan, 2007. U.S. responsibility: Mujahideen-era networks created recruitment base. Outcome: Attacks in Pakistan; cross-border operations. Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tehrik-i-Taliban_Pakistan 🧵 25. Jaish-e-Mohammed Origin: Pakistan-administered Kashmir. U.S. responsibility: Regional power vacuums and early Cold War networks enabled emergence. Outcome: Terror attacks in Kashmir and India. Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jaish-e-Mohammed 🧵 26. Lashkar-e-Taiba Origin: Pakistan, 1987. U.S. responsibility: Mujahideen-era networks provided early regional framework. Outcome: Mumbai attacks and Pakistan-administered Kashmir operations. Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lashkar-e-Taiba 🧵 27. Ansar al-Sharia (Libya & Yemen) Origin: Post-Gaddafi Libya & Yemen. U.S./NATO responsibility: State collapse after intervention created enabling environment. Outcome: Local terror campaigns. Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ansar_al-Sharia_(Libya) 🧵 28. Abu Sayyaf Origin: Philippines, early 1990s. U.S. responsibility: Cold War-era mujahideen networks seeded Islamist militancy; regional military aid amplified them. Outcome: Kidnappings and terror operations in the Philippines. Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abu_Sayyaf Continuing from 🧵29: 🧵 29. Al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) Origin: Yemen, 2009 (merger of Saudi and Yemeni Al-Qaeda branches). U.S. responsibility: Mujahideen-era networks and post-9/11 proxy operations indirectly enabled recruitment, funding, and logistics. Outcome: Regional and international terror operations. Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al-Qaeda_in_the_Arabian_Peninsula 🧵 30. Al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM) Origin: Algeria, 2007 (rebranding of GSPC). U.S. responsibility: Cold War-era funding and weapons flows into North Africa helped form militant networks. Outcome: Terror attacks across North Africa; kidnapping and insurgency campaigns. Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al-Qaeda_in_the_Islamic_Maghreb 🧵 31. Islamic State – Khorasan Province (IS-K) Origin: Afghanistan, 2015. U.S. responsibility: Power vacuums from long-term interventions and Afghan instability enabled emergence. Outcome: Deadly insurgency targeting Afghanistan and regional actors. Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_State_%E2%80%93_Khorasan_Province 🧵 32. Jemaah Islamiyah (JI) Origin: Southeast Asia, 1993. U.S. responsibility: Mujahideen-era networks and Cold War-era anti-communist frameworks seeded Islamist mobilization. Outcome: Regional terrorism, including Bali bombings. Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jemaah_Islamiyah 🧵 33. Al-Shabab (Somalia) Origin: Somalia, 2006. U.S. responsibility: Early 1990s Cold War-era interventions, arms flows to Somali warlords, indirectly enabled rise. Outcome: Regional insurgency and terror attacks in East Africa. Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al-Shabaab_(militant_group) 🧵 34. Harakat al-Shabaab al-Mujahideen (HSM) Origin: Somalia, 1990s. U.S./Gulf responsibility: Funding and indirect logistical support of Somali factions helped spawn militant networks. Outcome: Long-term regional terror network. Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al-Shabaab_(militant_group) 🧵 35. Islamic Jihad Union (IJU) Origin: Central Asia, early 2000s. U.S. responsibility: Afghan mujahideen-era networks and cross-border recruitment enabled formation. Outcome: Operations in Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan, and Germany. Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_Jihad_Union 🧵 36. Kata'ib Hezbollah (Iraq) Origin: Iraq, mid-2000s. U.S. responsibility: Post-2003 Iraq destabilization created space; regional proxy flows indirectly empowered militias. Outcome: Anti-U.S. insurgency and Iranian-aligned operations. Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kata'ib_Hezbollah 🧵 37. Jaysh Rijal al-Tariqa al-Naqshbandia (JRTN) Origin: Iraq, post-2003. U.S. responsibility: Iraq invasion dismantled state; militia growth enabled. Outcome: Local insurgent operations and sectarian violence. Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JRTN 🧵 38. Al-Murabitun (North Africa & Sahel) Origin: 2013 merger of North African jihadist groups. U.S./France responsibility: Interventions in Libya and Mali destabilized region, allowing formation. Outcome: Sahel terror attacks and kidnappings. Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al-Murabitun_(militant_group) 🧵 39. Boko Haram (Nigeria) Origin: 2002. U.S. responsibility: Regional military aid and counterinsurgency programs indirectly facilitated growth. Outcome: Terror campaigns, including kidnappings and attacks on civilians. Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boko_Haram 🧵 40. Ansar al-Sharia (Yemen) Origin: Yemen, post-Arab Spring. U.S. responsibility: Proxy interventions, destabilization, and arms flows indirectly enabled organization. Outcome: Regional insurgency and terror attacks. Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ansar_al-Sharia_(Yemen)

Taliban - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org
Afghan mujahideen - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org
Islamic state - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org
Hamas - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org
Fatah - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org
Sabra and shatila massacre - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org
Al-Nusra Front - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org
Bosnian mujahideen - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org
Hezbollah - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org
Page not found | Brookings brookings.edu
Page Not Found | The Guardian theguardian.com
Timber sycamore - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org
Haqqani network - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org
Fatah al-islam - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org
Boko Haram - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org
Al-shabaab (militant group) - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org
Islamic movement of uzbekistan - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org
Fatah - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org
Islamic state – libya province - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org
Jaysh al-islam - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org
Ahrar al-sham - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org
Fatah - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org
Tehrik-i-taliban pakistan - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org
Jaish-e-mohammed - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org
Lashkar-e-taiba - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org
Ansar al-sharia (libya) - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org
Abu sayyaf - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org
Al-qaeda in the arabian peninsula - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org
Al-qaeda in the islamic maghreb - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org
Islamic state – khorasan province - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org
Jemaah Islamiyah - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org
Al-shabaab (militant group) - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org
Al-shabaab (militant group) - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org
Islamic jihad union - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org
Kata'ib hezbollah - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org
Jrtn - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org
Al-murabitun (militant group) - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org
Boko Haram - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org
Ansar al-sharia (yemen) - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

🧵 https://t.co/RSt8jDxb46

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

The Origin of Terror (DEEP THREAD)🧵 1. Al-Qaeda Origin: Late 1970s–1980s, Soviet-Afghan War U.S. Responsibility: The CIA's Operation Cyclone was a covert program initiated in 1979 to arm and finance Afghan mujahideen fighters during the Soviet-Afghan War. This operation, one of the longest and most expensive in CIA history, involved the provision of weapons, training, and financial support to Afghan resistance groups through Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI). The program's primary objective was to counter Soviet influence in the region. However, it inadvertently laid the groundwork for the rise of Al-Qaeda. The influx of foreign fighters, including Osama bin Laden, and the establishment of training camps created a fertile environment for the development of transnational jihadist networks. These networks eventually coalesced into Al-Qaeda, which turned against its former benefactors, executing attacks such as the September 11, 2001, attacks on the United States. Outcome: Al-Qaeda, originally a logistical network for Afghan jihadists, evolved into a global terrorist organization, orchestrating numerous attacks against U.S. and Western targets. Their motivation? ▫️U.S. Military Presence in the Middle East: American troops were stationed in Saudi Arabia, home to Islam’s two holiest sites (Mecca and Medina), after the Gulf War (1990–1991). This was viewed as an occupation of sacred land and directly fueled outrage among Islamist groups. ▫️Support for Israel: The U.S. provided political, military, and financial support to Israel, backing policies that oppressed and displaced Palestinians. This made the U.S. a legitimate target in the eyes of Al-Qaeda. ▫️Sanctions and Military Interventions in Muslim Countries: U.S.-led sanctions and military interventions in Iraq during the 1990s caused massive civilian suffering, which Al-Qaeda cited as direct evidence of Western hostility toward Muslims. ▫️Support for Authoritarian Middle Eastern Governments: The U.S. backed regimes in Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Jordan, and Pakistan that actively repressed Islamic movements and populations, effectively making the U.S. complicit in the oppression of Muslims. ▫️Ideological and Religious Motivation: Al-Qaeda framed the attacks as defensive jihad — a religious duty to respond to Western aggression against Muslim populations. The U.S. was considered the “far enemy,” the main source of the oppression they were defending against. ▫️Retaliation for Prior U.S. Actions: Past U.S. interventions, including drone strikes, support for Mujahideen-turned-state adversaries, and sanctions, were treated as direct attacks on Muslims. The 9/11 attacks were a form of retribution for these policies. Wikipedia: https: //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al-Qaeda

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

https://t.co/sSYt3NS9QQ

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

The Origin of Terror🧵2. Taliban — Deliberate U.S. Destabilization & Weaponization Retired Gen. Wesley Clark - Democracy Now 2007 FULL📽️ Origin: Early 1990s, post-Soviet Afghanistan U.S. role: Direct and indirect—CIA aid, Pakistan’s ISI, U.S. military infrastructure, and billions in funding created the networks and conditions the Taliban exploited. Outcome: Taliban seized power (1996–2001), sheltered Al-Qaeda, and regained control after the 2021 U.S. withdrawal, equipped with U.S. hardware and access to financial flows. Cold War & Soviet Invasion (1979–1989) Operation Cyclone: CIA funneled billions via Pakistan’s ISI and Saudi funds to Afghan Mujahideen to fight the USSR. Training & Infrastructure: Camps in Pakistan and Afghanistan created hardened militant networks, including foreign Arab fighters such as Osama bin Laden. Policy Goal: Defeat the Soviets; Washington ignored long-term ideological extremism and regional instability. Post-Soviet Withdrawal & Civil War (1989–1992+) Soviet-backed Afghan government collapsed; Mujahideen factions turned on each other. Kabul shelled daily, public exhausted with lawlessness, corruption, and warlord abuses. Conditions made a “restorer of order” appealing—Taliban filled that vacuum. (Sources: Al Jazeera, Wikipedia, BBC) Rise of the Taliban (1994–1996) Madrassa students from Pakistan (Taliban = “students” in Pashto) promised to restore order and enforce strict Sharia. Benefited from: • Weapons and logistics left from U.S.-funded Mujahideen • Cross-border sanctuaries and supply lines • Training culture and militant ideology seeded by CIA/ISI Pakistan’s Role ISI backed the Taliban as a proxy to secure Afghanistan, counter India, and control trade routes. Provided safe havens, intelligence, and tactical support. U.S. Policy After 2001 & Withdrawal Fallout Taliban overthrown but regrouped in Pakistan. Obama era: U.S. poured resources into Afghan security forces and built massive bases (e.g., Bagram) — infrastructure that would later fall intact to Taliban. Biden era (2021): Rapid withdrawal left U.S. bases, Black Hawks, advanced rifles, vehicles, and equipment. Taliban quickly captured and showcased these assets. Funding: Reports indicate billions of U.S. taxpayer money flowed indirectly into Taliban-controlled systems via Afghan government structures, local taxes, and diverted aid. SIGAR audits document this. Strategic Context — Perpetual Proxy Warfare Iran-Contra precedent: U.S. repeatedly used covert arms-for-cash operations and proxies to destabilize regions while maintaining deniability. Retired Gen. Wesley Clark described a Pentagon memo planning regime-change campaigns in seven countries over five years — illustrating the mindset of using chaos and proxies as tools of power consolidation. Summary — Fact-Based Timeline 1979–1989: U.S. builds and arms Mujahideen to fight Soviets. 1989–1992: Civil war as Soviet exit leaves power vacuum. 1994–1996: Taliban rise using U.S.-enabled infrastructure and ISI support. 2001–2021: U.S. topples Taliban but pours in bases, weapons, and funds; Taliban remain resilient. 2021+: Biden-era withdrawal leaves Taliban with U.S. hardware and access to indirect financial flows. Result: A movement Washington fostered through deliberate policies and decades of funding became a long-term adversary — fully enabled by U.S. actions, proving that destabilization has been an intentional and recurring strategy.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Democracy Now airs an interview with General Wesley Clark about his presidential plans and US policy. Clark says about running: "I'm waiting for several different preconditions, which I'm not at liberty to discuss. But I will tell you this. I think about it every single day." He recounts a wartime memo describing plans to 'take out seven countries in five years, starting with Iraq and then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and finishing off Iran.' He argues Iran's influence in Iraq reflects US presence and warns the US should use force only as a last resort, urging diplomacy with Iran and Syria as part of a broader strategy. He defends Kosovo actions but says he regrets innocent deaths. He supports soldiers' rights to refuse deployment but stresses discipline. He backs closing Guantanamo, repealing the Military Commissions Act, and creating an international tribunal.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: From Speaker 1: It's happened before. You know Speaker 0: Will it happen again? Speaker 1: It might. Speaker 0: Today, an hour with retired general Wesley Clark. Will you announce for president? Speaker 1: Well, haven't said I won't. Speaker 0: What are you waiting for? Speaker 1: I'm waiting for several different preconditions, which I'm not at liberty to discuss. But I will tell you this. I think about it every single day. Speaker 0: Wesley Clark, on generals who run Iran, the war in Iraq, Israel Palestine impeachment, soldiers who refused to fight cluster bombs, the bombing of radio television Serbia, and was it a war crime, and more coming up. Welcome to democracynow, democracynow.org, the war and peace report. I'm Amy Goodman. At least 17 people have been killed in a storm carrying powerful tornadoes to the South and Midwest. Seven have died in Alabama with another nine deaths reported in Georgia. The army has fired the general in charge of the Walter Reed Army Medical Center. Major general George Waitman's dismissal comes more than a week into the fallout over the disclosure the army's top medical facility is in a state of major decay. Waitman had headed Walter Reed for only six months. The army's current surgeon general, lieutenant general Kevin Kiley, will serve as a temporary replacement. Kiley is also a former commander of Walter His appointment has raised questions amidst complaints. He was made aware of the problems at Walter Reed more than three years ago, but failed to make any improvements. On Capitol Hill, the house judiciary committee has issued subpoenas to four of the eight US attorneys who lost their jobs in a wave of dismissals from the Bush administration. The subpoenas come as part of investigation into whether the attorneys were forced out for political reasons. The house move marks the democrats' first major use of their new subpoena authority. The four prosecutors have been called to appear before a hearing next Tuesday. In Iraq, 18 government workers and soldiers have been kidnapped in what's being called a retaliation to the alleged rape of a Sunni woman by Iraq Shia dominated police. Meanwhile, in Baghdad, US troops are continuing a series of raids in Shiite areas. This is Shiite leader, Sayeda Abbas. Speaker 2: We will demonstrate men, women, and children demanding the withdrawal of the occupiers from Iraq. As long as the occupiers are in Iraq, they will destroy Islam and Iraq. Speaker 3: We will Speaker 2: die. We will give everything we have just for the sake of getting the occupiers to withdraw from Iraq. Speaker 0: Meanwhile, the last major British charity in Iraq has announced it's pulled out its entire staff and ended its presence there. Save the Children UK had been in Iraq since the first Gulf War. The group says the security situation has made it impossible to continue operations. Save the Children says it can't protect staff members nor reach the Iraqi children it wants to help. The Pakistani government says it's arrested a former Taliban defense minister and key insurgent leader. The man Mullah Obadela would be the most senior Taliban member to be captured since the US invasion of Afghanistan. The arrest comes amid new tensions over Bush administration's call on Pakistan to crack down on a Qaeda figures. On Thursday, Pakistan's US ambassador, Mahmoud Ali Dharani, was asked if increasing pressure and threatened aid cuts could bring down Pakistani president general Pravesh Musharraf. Speaker 3: No. Possibly. It could bring him down. It could destabilize the whole country. It it could cause a mega problem there. That is possible. Speaker 0: Back in The United States, the house has passed a bill that would make it easier for workers to join unions. The Employee Free Choice Act would stop employers from demanding secret ballot elections and require them to recognize unions if a majority of workers consented. President Bush has promised to veto the bill, while senate Republicans say they'll filibuster. President Bush paid a visit to the Gulf Coast Thursday visiting towns in Louisiana and Mississippi. It was his first trip to areas hit by hurricane Katrina in six months. The Pentagon's announced David Hicks will be the first Guantanamo prisoner tried under the new US law authorizing military trials of alleged enemy combatants. Hicks is an Australian citizen accused of helping the Taliban fight US troops in Afghanistan. Meanwhile, there is more news from the Jose Padilla hearings. Military prosecutors are claiming a video recording of Padilla's last interrogation at a US Navy brig in South Carolina has been lost. Defense lawyers had requested the video in an effort to prove Padilla's harsh treatment and confinement has helped cause serious psychological damage, making him unfit for trial. A judge rejected the defense argument Wednesday. A trial is set to begin in two weeks. A new poll from the New York Times and CBS News shows continued support in this country for universal health care. 55% of Americans say universal access to health insurance is the nation's top domestic priority. 60% say they would pay more taxes if that would mean guaranteed insurance for everyone. 80% say granting universal access is more important than extending president Bush's tax cuts. In Argentina, president Nestor Kirchner has announced his government will reject any involvement of the international monetary fund in Argentina's debt payment. Kirchner made the comments during his state of the union address. Speaker 4: In the Paris club, they tell us, you must have an agreement with the international monetary fund to be able to pay the debt. We say to them, sirs, we are sovereign. We want to pay the debt, but no way in hell are we going to make an agreement again with the IMF. Speaker 0: The IMF helped push through a series of economic policies that many believe helped bring Argentina's economy to collapse in 02/2001. The Bush administration is vowing to continue with its controversial missile defense system in Eastern Europe regardless of approval from NATO allies. Under the plan, Poland would host a battery of up to 10 ballistic missiles while The Czech Republic would host a radar facility. The proposals have set off protests across Europe. On Thursday, missile defense agency director, lieutenant general Henry Obering, said The US has other alternatives if current plans are rejected. Speaker 5: Certainly, he's still talking to the to The United Kingdom, But but but The Czech Republic and Poland are the optimum locations for this. So if for some reason and we believe we have every reason to believe that those those discussions will be successful, but if some reason they're not, there are other alternatives that we could go to, but they're not the optimum. Speaker 0: In Lebanon, a Belgian physician who survived a lengthy kidnapping in Lebanon two decades ago has returned to bring attention to the effects of Israel's use of cluster bombs. The doctor, Jan Koules, spent thirteen months in captivity beginning in 1988. On Thursday, Kools called for a cluster bomb ban and said Israel should compensate Lebanon for dropping hundreds of thousands of cluster bomblets during its attack last year. Speaker 3: I think that it is a good thing that the mines will be cleared. Nobody would argue with that, and the Belgians are quite good at doing that. And the question can be asked, who is going to pay for Speaker 4: all this? This is one Speaker 1: of the claims that we put forward. Speaker 3: We think that it is up to the Israelis to pay for the cost of clearing the cluster bombs. We can also ask Israel to pay for the money to reconstruct Lebanon. The Speaker 0: Iranian government has announced president Mahmoud Aminin Ajad will visit Saudi Arabia Saturday for a rare meeting with king Abdullah. It'll be Ahmadinejad's first state visit to Saudi Arabia amid a time of increasing tensions with The United States. Meanwhile, in Madrid Thursday, Iranian foreign minister Manoukr Mataki renewed calls for negotiations. Speaker 4: We should be allowed back to the negotiating table to put forward our arguments before the media and the people. The US reasoning that they can have nuclear weapons and others can't have nuclear energy is not valid. Speaker 0: And finally, former Republican congress member Bob Nay has reported to prison to begin a thirty month sentence. Nay was convicted for lying about his dealings with convicted Republican lobbyist Jack Abramoff. For years, Nay traded his political influence for gifts, vacations, campaign contributions, and in one case, $50,000 in gambling chips. He'll serve his jail term in a minimum security prison in West Virginia. And those are some of the headlines. This is democracynowdemocracynow.org, the war and peace report. I'm Amy Goodman. Today, an exclusive hour with general Wesley Clark, the retired four star general. He was supreme allied commander of NATO during the Kosovo war. He's been awarded the presidential medal of freedom. In 02/2004, he unsuccessfully ran for the democratic presidential nomination. He recently edited a series of books about famous US generals, including Dwight Eisenhower and Ulysses Grant, both of whom became president after their military careers ended. On Tuesday, I interviewed Wesley Clark at the ninety second Street wide Cultural Center here in New York City before a live audience and asked him about his presidential ambitions. What do you think of these generals who run for president? I like them. Speaker 1: It's happened before. You know Speaker 0: Will it happen again? It might. Later in the interview, I followed up on that question. Will you announce for president? Speaker 1: Well, I haven't said I won't. Speaker 0: What are you waiting for? Speaker 1: I'm waiting for several different preconditions, which I'm not at liberty to discuss. But I will tell you this. I think about it every single day. Speaker 0: Well, for the rest of the hour, we'll hear general Wesley Clark in his own words on the possibility of a US attack on Iran, the impeachment of president Bush, the use of cluster bombs, the bombing of radio television Serbia during the Kosovo war under his command, and much more. I interviewed general Clark on Tuesday at the 90 Second Street Y in New York. Now let's talk about Iran. You have a whole website devoted to stopping war. Speaker 1: Www.stopiranwar.com. Speaker 0: Do you see a replay of what happened in the lead up to the war with Iraq? The allegations of the weapons of mass destruction, the media leaping on to the bandwagon. Speaker 1: Well, in a way, but but but it's but, you know, history doesn't repeat itself exactly twice. What I did warn about when I testified in front of congress in 02/2002, I said, if you want to worry about a state, it shouldn't be Iraq. It should be Iran. But this government, our administration, wanted to worry about Iraq, not Iran. I I knew why. Because I'd been through the Pentagon. Right after 09:11, about ten days after 09:11, went through the Pentagon and I saw secretary Rumsfeld and and deputy secretary Wolferwitz. I went downstairs just to say hello to some of the people on the joint staff who used used to work for me. And one of the generals called me and he said, sir, you gotta come in you gotta come in and talk to me a second. I said, well, you're too busy. He said, no. No. He says, you we've made the decision. We're going to war with Iraq. This was on or about the September 20. I said, we're going to war with Iraq. Why? He said, I don't know. He said, I guess they don't know what else to do. So I said, well, did they find some information collect connecting Saddam to Al Qaeda? He said, no. No. He says there's nothing new that way. They just made the decision to go to war with Iraq. He said, I guess it's like we don't know what to do about terrorists, but we've got a good military and we can take down governments. And he said, I guess if the only tool you have is a hammer, every problem has to look like a nail. So I came back to see him a few weeks later. And by that time, we were bombing in Afghanistan. I said, are we still going to war with Iraq? And he said, oh, it's worse than that. He said he reached over on his desk. He picked up a piece of paper. He said, I just he said, I just got this down from upstairs, meaning the secretary of defense's office today. And he said, this is a memo that describes how we're gonna take out seven countries in five years, starting with Iraq and then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and finishing off Iran. I said, is it classified? He said, yes, sir. I said I said, well, don't show it to me. And I saw him a year or so ago. And I said, do remember that? He said, sir, I didn't show you that memo. I didn't show it to you. Speaker 0: I'm sorry. What did you say his name was? Speaker 1: I'm not gonna give you his name. Speaker 0: So go through the countries again. Speaker 1: Well, starting with Iraq, then Syria and Lebanon, then Libya, then Somalia and Sudan, and then back to Iran. So when you look at Iran, you say, is it a a replay? It's not exactly a replay. But here's the truth, that Iran from the beginning has seen that the presence of The United States in Iraq was a threat, a blessing because we took out Saddam Hussein and the Ba'athists. They couldn't handle them. We could took care of it for them. But also a threat because they knew that they were next on the hit list. And so, of course, they got engaged. They lost a million people during the war with Iraq. And they got a long and unprotectable, unsecurable border. So it was in their vital interest to be deeply involved inside Iraq. They tolerated our attacks on the Baathists. They were happy we captured Saddam Hussein. But they're building up their own network of influence. And to cement it, they occasionally give some military assistance and training and advice either directly or indirectly to both the insurgents and to the militias. And in that sense, it's not exactly parallel because there has been, I believe, continuous Iranian engagement. Some of it legitimate. Some of it illegitimate. I mean, you can hardly fault Iran because they're offering to do eye operations for Iraqis who need medical attention. That's not an offense that you can go to war over, perhaps. But it is an effort to gain influence. The administration has stubbornly refused to talk Iran about their perception, in part because they don't want to pay the price with their domestic our U. Domestic political base, the right wing base, but also because they don't want to legitimate a government that they've been trying to overthrow. If you were Iran, you'd probably believe that you were mostly already at war with The United States anyway since we've asserted that their government needs regime change. So and we've asked congress to appropriate $75,000,000 to do it, and we are supporting terrorist groups apparently who are infiltrating and blowing up things inside Iraq Iran. And if we're not doing it, let's put it this way, we're probably cognizant of it and encouraging it. So it's not surprising that we're moving to a point of confrontation crisis with Iran. My point on this is not that the Iranians are good guys, they're not, but that you shouldn't use force except as a last, last, last resort. There is a military option, but it's a bad one. Speaker 0: I wanted to get your response to Seymour Hirsch's piece in The New Yorker to two key points this week. Reporting the Pentagon's established a special planning group within the office of the Joint Chiefs of Staff to plan a bomb bombing attack on Iran, that this is coming as the Bush administration and Saudi Arabia are pumping money for covert operations into many areas of the Middle East, Lebanon, Syria, and Iran in an effort to strengthen Saudi supported Sunni Islam groups and weaken Iranian backed Shias. Some of the covert money has been given to jihadist groups in Lebanon with ties to Al Qaeda. Fighting the Shias by funding with Prince Bandar and then with US money not approved by Congress funding the Sunnis connected to Al Qaeda? Speaker 1: Well, I don't have any direct information to confirm it or deny it. It it's certainly plausible. The Saudis have taken a more active role. You know, the the Saudis Speaker 0: You were just in Saudi Arabia? Mhmm. You just came back Speaker 1: from Saudi Arabia? The Saudis have basically recognized that they have an enormous stake in the outcome in Iraq, and they don't particularly trust the judgment of The United States in this area. We haven't exactly proved our competence in Iraq. So they're trying to take matters into their own hands. The real danger is, and one of the reasons this is so complicated, is because let's say we did follow the desires of some people who say, just pull out and pull out now. Well, yeah, we we could mechanically do that. It would be ugly and it might take three or four months, but you could line up the battalions on the road one by one, and you could put the gunners and the Humvees and cock load and cock their weapons and shoot their way out of Iraq. You'd have a few roadside bombs, but if you line everybody up, there won't be any roadside bombs, maybe some sniping. You can fly helicopters over, do your air cover. You probably get safely out of there. But when you leave, the Saudis have gotta find someone to fight the Shias. Who are they gonna find? Al Qaeda. Because the groups of Sunnis who would be extremist and willing to fight would probably be the groups connected to Al Qaeda. So one of the weird inconsistencies in this is that were we to get out early, we'd be intensifying the threat against us of a super powerful Sunni extremist group which was now legitimated by overt Saudi funding in an effort to hang on to a a toehold inside Iraq and block Iranian expansionism. Speaker 0: And interestingly today, John Negroponte has just become the number two man, resigning his post as national intelligence director, to go to the State Department. Seymour Hirsch says because of his discomfort that the administration's covert actions in The Middle East so closely echo the Iran Contra scandal of the nineteen eighties and Negra Ponte was involved with that. Speaker 1: Well, I'm sure there are lot of reasons why John would go back to the State Department. John's a good he's a good man. But, you know, the question is in government is can you are you bigger than your job? Because if you're not bigger than your job, you get trapped by the pressures of events and processes into going along with actions that you know you shouldn't. And I don't know. I don't know why he left the national intelligence director's position. He started in the State Department. Maybe he's got a fondness to return and finish off his career in state. Speaker 0: Can you talk about do you know who the generals are who are threatening to resign Speaker 1: No. I don't. If No. Speaker 0: The United States And I Speaker 1: don't want know. Speaker 0: Do you agree with them? Speaker 1: Well, I'll put it this way. In on Labor Day weekend of nineteen ninety four, when I was the J five, I was a three star general. I was in the Pentagon, and and it was a Saturday morning. And so I was in the Walt Cross was the director of the joint staff and he was in the office. Think it was either Hal Elestis or Jack Sheehan who was the J-three at the time. The three of us, I think it was Jack still in the job for the last couple of days. And the three of us were in Shali Kashvili's office about 11:00 in the morning on a Saturday morning, and he had just come back from a White House meeting. And he was all fired up and the way that Shali could be. And he said, so, he said, we will see who will be the real soldiers this weekend. There is much work to be done. This operation on Haiti has to be completed. The planning must be done correctly, and it must be done this weekend so we will see who are the real soldiers. And then the phone buzzed, and he got up from this little roundtable the four of us were sitting at to take the call from the White House. We sort of looked at each other. We said, gosh, I wonder where this came from. I mean, we were all getting ready to check out of the building in an hour or so. We finished off the messages and paperwork, and we just usually got together because there was normally a crisis every Saturday anyway. So we normally would come in for the Saturday morning crisis. And so Charlie came back, and and and so I said to him, I said, well, sir, we've been talking amongst ourselves and we're happy to work all weekend to get all this done. But this is just a drill, right, on Haiti? He looked at me and he said, Wes, he said, this is no drill. He said, I'm not authorized to tell you this. But he said, the decision has been made and The United States will invade Haiti. The date is the twentieth, I think it was his date, of the September 20. And the planning must be done, and it must be done now. And if any of you have reservations about this, this is the time to leave. So I looked at at Jack and I looked at Walt. They looked at me. And I mean, we kind of shrugged our shoulders and said, okay, if you want to invade Haiti, I mean, it's not illegal. It's not the country we'd most like to invade. The opposition there consists of five armored vehicles. And but sure. I mean, if the president says to do it, yeah, we're not gonna resign over it. And so we didn't resign. Nobody resigned. But Charlie was a very smart man. He knew. He was bigger than his job and he knew that you had to ask yourself the moral, legal, and ethical questions first. And so I'm encouraged by the fact that some of these generals have said this about Iran. They should be asking these questions first. Speaker 0: General Wesley Clark, he says he thinks about running for president again every day. We'll come back to my interview with him in a minute. Speaker 6: One, and he's only 17. He's been a soldier for a thousand years. He's a Catholic, a Hindu, an atheist, a Jew. And he knows he shouldn't kill, and he knows he Speaker 3: always will kill you. For me, Speaker 6: my friend, and me for you. And he's fighting for Canada. He's fighting for France. He's fighting for The USA. And he's fighting for the Russians, and he's fighting for Japan. And he thinks we'll put an end to war this way. He's fighting for democracy if he Speaker 0: Buffy St. Marie, Universal here on democracynow, democracynow.org, the war and peace report. I'm Amy Goodman as we go back to my interview with general Wesley Clark. What about the soldiers who are saying no to going to Iraq right now? Iraq? To going to Iraq. People like first lieutenant Aaron Wattada, first commissioned officer to say no to deploy. And he they just declared a mistrial. And as court marshal, he will face another court marshal in a few weeks. What do you think of these young men and women? There are now thousands who are refusing. But for example, Aaron Wattata, who says he feels it's wrong. He feels it's illegal and immoral, and he doesn't want to lead men and women there. Speaker 1: Well, I think it's you know, he's certainly made a personally courageous statement, and he'll pay for the con he'll pay with the consequences of it. Speaker 0: Do you think he should have to go to jail for that? Speaker 1: Well, I think that you have to have an effective armed forces. And I think that it's not up to the men and women in the armed forces to choose where they'll go to war. Because at the very time you need the armed forces the most is there'll be a certain number of people who will see it the other way. And so I support his right to refuse to go, and I support the government's effort to bring charges against him. This is the way the system works. Now, the difference is the case that I described with Charlie Kashpile is we would have been given the chance to retire. We would have left our jobs. We might not have retired as three star generals because we hadn't done our duty. But we weren't in the same circumstance that he is, so there wasn't necessarily going to be charges brought against us. But an armed forces has to have discipline. It's not a it's a voluntary organization to join, but it's not voluntary unless it's illegal. And you can bring the the the trouble with Iraq is it's not illegal. It was authorized by the United States Congress. It was authorized by the United Nations Security Council resolution. It's an illegitimate war, but not an illegal war. Speaker 0: Do you think it's wrong? Speaker 1: It's wrong to fight in Iraq? Well, think it's a mistake. I think it's a bad strategy. I think it's brought us a lot of grief and will bring us a lot more grief. I think it's been a tremendous distraction from the war on terror, diversion of resources, and it's reinforced our enemies. But on the other hand, his case is a moral case, not a legal case. And if you're going to be a conscientious objector morally like this, then what makes it commendable is that you'll take your stand on principle and pay the price. If there's no price to be paid for it, then the courage of your act isn't self evident. So he's taken a very personally courageous stand. But on the other hand, you have to also appreciate the fact that the armed forces has to be able to function. So, you know, in World War I in France, there were a series of terribly misplaced offensives. And they brought they failed again and again and again. The French took incredible losses. And these were these were conscript armies. And after one of these failures, a group of thousands of soldiers simply said, we're not doing this again. It's wrong. You know what the French did? They did what they called decimation. They lined up the troops. They took every tenth soldier, and they shot them. Now the general who ordered that, he suffered some severe repercussions personally, morally. But after that, the soldiers in France didn't disobey. Had the army disintegrated at that point, Germany would have occupied France. So when you're dealing with the use of force, there is an element of compulsion in the armed forces. Speaker 0: But if the politicians will not stop it, as you pointed out, the Democrats joined with the Republicans in authorizing the war, then it's quite significant, I think, that you, as a general, are saying that this man has taken a courageous act. Then it's up to the people who are being sent to go to say no. Speaker 1: Yeah. But what the courage that we need is not his courage. We need the courage of the leaders in the United States government. The generals who could affect the policy, the people in congress who could force the president to change his strategy Speaker 0: How could they Speaker 1: do that? The current. That's the courage that's needed. Speaker 0: And how could they do that? Speaker 1: Well, you start with a nonbinding resolution in the United States congress and you build your momentum from there. And you keep hammering it. You you the congress has three principal powers. It has a power to appoint, power to investigate, power to fund. And you go after all three on all three fronts. You find out what the president needs until he takes it seriously. I think it's a difficult maneuver to to use a scalpel and say, we're we're gonna support funding, but we're not gonna support funding for the surge because that's requiring a degree of micromanagement that congress can't do. But you can certainly put enough squeeze on the president that he finally calls in the leaders of the congress and says, okay. Okay. What's it gonna take? I've gotta get my White House budget passed. I've gotta get 30 judges, federal judges confirmed. I've gotta get these these federal prosecutors, you know, the ones that I caused to resign so I could handle it. They've got to get replacements in place. What do I have to do to to get some support here? I mean, it could be done. It's hard, bare knuckle government. Speaker 0: Do you think congress should stop funding the war? Speaker 1: I think congress should take a strong stand to get the strategy changed. I don't think that if you cut off funding for the war, it's in the right now, that's not in The United States' interest. What is in The United States' interest is to change the strategy in the war. You cannot succeed by simply stopping the funding and saying you've got six months to get the Americans out. That's not gonna end the misery in Iraq. It's not gonna restore the lives of that have been lost, and it's not gonna give us the power in the region to prevent later threats. What we do have to do is have a strategy that uses all the elements of America's power, diplomatic, economic, legal, and and military. I would send a high level diplomatic team into the region. Right now, I'd have no holds barred and no preconditioned discussion with Iran and Syria. And I would let it be known that I've got in my bag all the tricks including putting another 50,000 troops in Iraq and pulling all 150,000 troops out. And we're going to reach an agreement on a statement of principles that brings stability and peace and order to the region. Let's just sit down and start doing it. That could be done with the right administrative leadership. It just hasn't been done. Think of it this way. You're on a ship crossing the Atlantic. It's a new ship and it's at night. And you're looking out ahead of the ship, and you notice that there's a part of the horizon. It's a beautiful starry night, except that there's a part of the horizon and sort of irregular hump out there where there are no stars visible. And you notice as the ship plows through the water at 30 knots that this area where there are no stars is getting larger. And finally it hits you that there must be something out there that's blocking the starlight, like an iceberg. So you run to the captain and you say, captain, captain, there's an iceberg and we're driving right toward it. And he says, look, I can't be bothered with the iceberg right now. We're having an argument about the number of deck chairs on the fore deck versus the aft deck. And and you say, but you're gonna hit an iceberg. He says, I'm sorry. Get out of here. So you go to the first officer, and he says, I'm fighting with the captain on the number of deck chairs. You know, we're approaching an iceberg in The Middle East in our policy. And we've got congress and The United States and the president of The United States fighting over troop strength in Iraq. It's the wrong issue. The issue is the strategy, not the troop strength. Speaker 0: General Clark, do you think Guantanamo Bay should be closed? Speaker 1: Absolutely. If Speaker 0: congress cut off funds for the prison there, it would be closed, should they? Speaker 1: Well, I think the first thing congress should do is repeal the Military Commissions Act. I'm very disturbed that a number of people who are looking at the highest office in the land have supported an act which advertently or inadvertently authorizes the admission into evidence of information gained through torture. That's not the America that I believe in. And the America that I believe in doesn't detain people indefinitely without charges. So I'd start with the military commissions act. Then I'd get our NATO allies into the act. They they they've said they don't like Guantanamo either. So I'd like to create an international tribunal, not a kangaroo court of military commissions, and let's go back through the evidence and let's lay it out. Who are these people that have been held down there? And what have they been held for? And which ones can be released? And which ones should be tried in court and convicted? You see, essentially, you cannot win the war on terror by military force. It is first and foremost a battle of ideas. It is secondly a a law enforcement effort, a cooperative effort among nations. And only as a last resort do you use military force. This president has distorted the capabilities of the United States Armed Forces. He's used our men and women in uniform improperly in Guantanamo and engaged in actions that I think are totally against the uniform code of military justice and against what we stand for as the American people. Speaker 0: Do you think that president Bush should be impeached? Well, Speaker 1: I think we ought to do first things first, which is we really need to understand and finish the job that congress started with respect to the Iraq war investigation. We were do you remember that there was gonna be a study released by the senate, that the senator from Iowa or from Kansas who was the Republican head of the senate intelligence committee, was going to, do this study to determine whether the administration had in fact misused the intelligence information to mislead us into the war with Iraq. Well, I've never seen that study. I'd like to know where that study is. I'd like to know why we've spent three years investigating Scooter Libby when we should have been investigating why this country went to war in Iraq. The Speaker 0: the Center for Constitutional Rights has filed a complaint against Donald Rumsfeld, General Miller and others in a German court because they have universal jurisdiction. Do you think that Donald Rumsfeld should be tried for war crimes? Speaker 1: Well, I'd like to see what the evidence is against Rumsfeld. I do know this, that there was a lot of pressure put on the men and women in uniform to come up with intelligence. I remember, I think it was either General Sanchez or General Abizaid who stated that we don't need more troops. This is the 2003. We just need better information. Well, to me that was immediate code words that we were really trying to soak these people for information. It's only a short step from there to all the kinds of mistreatment that occur at places like Abu Ghraib. So we know that Al Gonzalez wrote a couple of really or authored or his people authored and he approved a couple of outrageous memos that attempted to define torture as deliberately inflicted pain the equivalent of the loss of a major bodily organ or limb, which is it's not an adequate definition of torture. And we know that he authorized to some degree some coercive methods which we haven't. And we know president Bush himself accepted implicitly an assigning statement to a 2,005 act on military detainees that he would use whatever methods were appropriate or necessary. There's been some official condoning of these actions. I think it's a violation of international law and a violation of American law and a violation of the principles of good government in America. There have always been evidences of mistreatment of prisoners. Every army has probably done it in history. But our country hasn't ever done it as a matter of deliberate policy. George Washington told his soldiers when they captured the Hessians and the men wanted to run them through because the Hessians were brutal and ruthless, He said, no. Treat them well. He said, they'll join our side. And many of them did. It was a smart policy. Not only the right thing to do, but a smart policy to treat the enemy well. We've made countless enemies in that part of the world by the way we've treated people and disregarded them. It's bad, bad policy. Speaker 0: I wanted to ask you're a Fox News contributor now? Speaker 1: Oh, at least. Speaker 0: I wanted to ask you what you think of the dean of West Point, Brigadier General Patrick Finnegan, together with a military interrogator known named Tony Lagranas and the group Human Rights First. Going to the heads of the program 24, very popular hit show on, Fox, to tell them that what they're doing on this program, glorifying torture, is inspiring young men and women to go to Iraq and torture soldiers there and to stop it. Speaker 1: And not only that, but it doesn't work. Yeah. Pat Finnegan is one of my heroes. Speaker 0: So what do you think about that? And have you been involved in the conversation at Fox, which runs 24, to stop it? Speaker 1: Well, as far as I know, they've they actually put out a call to all the writers in Hollywood. My son's a writer, he was one of them who got a call. It it they were all told, stop talking about torture. It doesn't work. So I think it's it was an effective move by Pat Finnegan. Speaker 0: So you support it? Absolutely. General Wesley Clark. I'm interviewing him at the 90 Second Street. Why? We're gonna come back to the conclusion of that interview in a minute. Speaker 6: 19 miles to Baghdad. What have I Speaker 0: democracynowdemocracynow.org, the war and peace report. I'm Amy Goodman. General Wesley Clark recently edited a series of books about famous US generals, Grant, LeMay, Patton, and Eisenhower. When I interviewed him at the 90 Second Street Y, I asked him a question about the presidency of general Dwight Eisenhower. 1953 was also a seminal date for today. And that was when Kermit Roosevelt, the grandson of Teddy Roosevelt, went to Iran and led a coup against Mohammed Mosaddegh under Eisenhower. Speaker 1: People make mistakes. And one of the one of the mistakes that The United States consistently made was that it could intervene and somehow adjust people's governments, especially in the Middle East. I don't know why we felt that you can understand Latin America because Latin America was always an area in which people would come to The United States and say, you've got to help us down there. These are bounditos, and they don't know anything. And, you know, they don't have a government. Just intervene and save our property. And The United States did it a lot in the twenties. Of course, Eisenhower was part of that culture. He'd seen it. But in The Middle East, we'd never been there. We established a relationship during World War two, of course, to keep the Germans out of Iran. And so the Soviets and the Brits put an allied mission together. At the end of World War two, the Soviets didn't want to resign re withdraw. And, Truman called their bluff in the United Nations. And Eisenhower knew all of this, and and and Iran somehow became incorporated into the American defense perimeter. And so, his view would have been we couldn't allow a communist to take over. Speaker 0: But what's it more Speaker 1: about British petroleum? Speaker 0: What isn't it more about British petroleum? Speaker 1: Oh, it's always there are always interests. The truth is about The Middle East is had there been no oil there, it would be like Africa. Nobody is threatening to intervene in Africa. The problem is the opposite. We keep asking for people to intervene and stop it. And there's there's no question that the presence of petroleum throughout the region has sparked great power involvement. Whether that was the specific motivation for the coup or not, I can't tell you. But but there was definitely there's always been this attitude that somehow we could intervene and use force in the region. I mean, that that was true with I mean, imagine us arming and creating the mujahideen to keep the Soviets out of Afghanistan. Why would we think we could do that? But we did. And, you know, my lesson on it is whenever you use force, there are unintended consequences. So you should use force as a last resort. Whether it's overt or covert, you pay enormous consequences for using force. Speaker 0: I wanted to ask you about what you think of the response to Jimmy Carter's book, Peace Not Apartheid. Speaker 1: Well, I'm sorry to say I haven't read the book. And it's one of the things I've been meaning to read, and I just haven't. I will tell you this, that we're in a very, very difficult position in Israel. I say we because every American president has committed to the protection and survival of the state of Israel. And I think that's right. And I certainly feel that way. And I'm a very strong supporter of Israel. But somehow we've got to move off top dead center in terms of these discussions with the Palestinians. And this administration has failed to lead. They came into office basically determined not to do anything that Bill Clinton did. I think that was the basic guideline. And so they have allowed unremitting violence between Israel and the Palestinians with hardly an effort to stop that through US leadership. And now it's almost too late. So Condie was over there the other day, and she didn't achieve what she wanted to achieve. And people want to blame the Saudis, but at least the Saudis tried to do something at Mecca by putting together a unity government. So I fault the administration. Jimmy Carter's taken a lot of heat from people. I don't know exactly what he said in the book, but people are very sensitive about Israel in this country. And I understand that. My a lot of my friends have explained it to me and explained to me the psychology of people who were in this country and saw what was happening in World War II, and maybe they didn't feel like they spoke out strongly enough, soon enough to stop it. And it's not gonna happen again. Speaker 0: General Clark, I wanted to ask you a tough question that about journalists. Speaker 1: Well, that would be the first tough question you've asked me tonight. Speaker 0: There are more than a 100 journalists and media workers in Iraq who have died. And particularly hard hit are Arab journalists. I mean, you had Tariq A'yub, the Al Jazeera reporter who died on the roof of Al Jazeera when the US military shelled Al Jazeera, then went on to shell the Palestine hotel and killed two reporters, a Reuters cameraman and one from Tele Cinco in in Spain named Jose Coso. Many Arab journalists feel like they have been targeted, the idea of shooting the messenger. But this tough question goes back to, your being supreme, allied commander in Yugoslavia and the bombing of radio television Serbia. Do you regret that that happened? Speaker 1: No. I don't regret that at all. And that was part of the Serb command and control network. And not only that, I was asked to take out that television by a lot of important political leaders. And before I took it out, I twice warned the Serbs we were gonna take it out. We stopped, at one news conference in the Pentagon. We planted the question to to get the attention of the Serbs that we were gonna target Serb radio and television. Speaker 0: Our Speaker 1: defense. Yeah. And that night, in fact, Milosevic got the warning because he summoned all the foreign journalists to come to a special mandatory party at at at RTS that night. But we weren't bombing that night. We put the word out twice before we actually did it. Speaker 0: You told CNN, which was also there, to leave? Speaker 1: I told I used I think I used CNN to plant the story and to leak it at the Pentagon press conference. But we didn't we didn't tell anyone specifically to leave. What we told them was it's now a target. And it was Milosevic who determined that he would keep people there in the middle of the night just so there'd be someone killed if we struck it. So we struck it during the hours where there were not supposed to be anybody there. Speaker 0: But you killed civilians. Speaker 1: Six people died. Speaker 0: I think 16. But I think it's the media where it's the beauticians, the technicians. Speaker 1: Yeah. They were they were ordered to stay there by Milosevic. Yeah. Speaker 0: But it was a civilian target. Speaker 1: It was not a civilian target. It was a military target. It was part of the Serb command and control network. Speaker 0: What do you think of Amnesty International calling it a war crime? Speaker 1: Well, I think it was investigated by the criminal tribunal on Yugoslavia and found to be a legitimate target. So I think it's perfectly alright for Amnesty International to have their say. But everything we did was approved by lawyers, and every target was blessed. Speaker 0: But upon reflection not Speaker 1: have committed a war crime. Speaker 0: Upon reflection now and knowing who died there, the young people, the people who worked for RTS, who, as you said, if Milosevic wanted people to stay there, they were just following orders? Speaker 1: Well, it was a tragedy. But I'll tell you something. If you wanna talk about tragedies, how about this one? We bombed what we thought was a Serb police station in Kosovo. We saw the Serb vehicles. We flew unmanned aerial vehicles over it, and and we did everything we could to identify it. And we found that there were Serb police vehicles parked there at night. So we sent an f 16 in, dropped two five hundred pound laser guided bombs, and took it out. We killed 80 Albanians who'd been imprisoned by the Serbs there. They were trying to escape, and the Serbs locked them up in this farmhouse and surrounded them with vehicles. So, I regret every single innocent person who died, and I prayed every night that there wouldn't be any innocent people who died. But this is why I say you must use force only as a last resort. I told the story to the high school kids earlier, but it bears repeating, I guess. We had a malfunction with a cluster bomb unit, and a couple of grenades fell on a schoolyard. And some three, I think, three schoolchildren were killed in Nis. And two weeks later, I got a letter from a Serb grandfather. He said, you killed my granddaughter. He said, I hate you for this, and I'll kill you. And, I got this in the middle of the war, and it made me very, very sad. We certainly never wanted to do anything like that. But in war, accidents happen. And that's why you shouldn't undertake military operations unless every other alternative has been exhausted because innocent people do die. And, I think the United States military was as humane and careful as it possibly could have been in the Kosovo campaign. But still civilians died. And I'll always regret that. Speaker 0: Do you think cluster bombs should be banned? Speaker 1: You know, we used, I think, 1,400 plus cluster bombs. And there's a time when you have to use cluster bombs, when they're the most appropriate and humane weapon. But I think you have to control the use very carefully. And I think we did in Yugoslavia. Speaker 0: Right now, The US has rejected an international call to ban the use of cluster bombs. On Friday, 46 countries were in Oslo to develop a new international treaty to ban the use of cluster munitions by, I think it's 02/2008. Would you support that? Speaker 1: Well, you know, people who are against war often make the case by trying to attack the weapons of war and stripping away the legitimacy of those weapons. I participated in some of that. I'd like to get rid of landmines. I did I did participate in getting rid of laser blinding weapons, and I was part of the team that put together the agreement that got rid of laser blinding weapons. I like to get rid of nuclear weapons. But I can't agree with those who say that force has no place in international affairs. It simply does for this country. And I would like to work to make it so that it doesn't. But the truth is, for now, it does. And so I can't go against giving our men and women in uniform the appropriate weapons they need to fight, to fight effectively, to succeed on the battlefield, and to minimize their own casualties. Speaker 3: Well, we'll have to leave it there. Speaker 0: I thank you very much, general Wesley Clark. Speaker 1: Thank you. Thank you very much. Thank you. Speaker 0: General Wesley Clark. I interviewed him at the 90 Second Street Y, the cultural center here in New York on the publication of the great general series and Grant, LeMay, Patton, and Eisenhower. If you'd like a copy of this exclusive interview, you can go to our website at democracynow.0rg. You can get a DVD, or you can watch, listen to, or read the transcript at our website. On Monday, we'll be interviewing war correspondent Robert Fisk in our firehouse studio. He's a recipient of the 2006 Lannan Lifetime Achievement Prize for Cultural Freedom. On Sunday, March 4 at 7PM, he'll be speaking at New York's town hall on West 40 Third Street. Democracy Now is produced by Mike Burke, Sharifoglou Koduz, John Hamilton, Elizabeth Press, Yoruba Richin, Erin Mate, Jen Yutz, Anuradha Bagwati, Megan Whitney, Mike DeFilippo, Nick Marcello, Miguel Negara are our engineers. Special thanks to Jenny Filippazo, Tim Kepler, and Dennis Moynihan. Thanks also to Angela Alston, Uri Gahlad, Rebecca Silver, Kieran Krug Meadows, Jerome Bourgeois, Tory Townsend, and Samantha Chamblay. Again, if you go to our website at democracynow.0rg, you can sign up for our daily headlines and media alerts and find out about the stories that we are working on in the coming days. Democracynow.0rg. I'm Amy Goodman. Thanks for joining us.

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

https://t.co/df7SDM9vDA

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

🧵 3. Afghan Mujahideen — How U.S. Policy Created a Militarized | Proxy Ecosystem President Ronald Reagan's Remarks and Chairman Yunis Khalis Remarks Following a Meeting With Afghan Resistance Leaders and Members of Congress in Roosevelt Room Origin: 1979–1989 (Soviet–Afghan War) U.S. role: Direct CIA funding, weapons transfers (including FIM-92 Stinger missiles), training, and covert programs routed through Pakistan’s ISI and Gulf partners. These were explicit, long-running policy choices intended to arm Afghan resistance against the USSR. Outcome: A heavily armed, politically fragmented insurgent ecosystem that later reconstituted into multiple militant actors (including groups that later joined or inspired Islamist movements and insurgencies). The mujahideen era created the weapons, logistics, cross-border sanctuaries, and combat culture that ruined Afghan state institutions and normalized militant proxy warfare. The policy: a presidential finding and Operation Cyclone • Fact: On 3 July 1979 a presidential finding authorized CIA support for Afghan insurgents. This began a formal, state policy of covert support. • Fact: The CIA’s covert program, commonly called Operation Cyclone (1979–1992), became one of the longest and most expensive covert actions in CIA history — explicitly to arm and finance the mujahideen. • Intent: The program’s declared aim was to “bleed” Soviet influence by sustaining Afghan resistance. That was the objective policymakers signed off on — not vague assistance but overt proxy warcraft. Money and materiel at scale • Fact: U.S. funding rose from under $1 million in 1979 to hundreds of millions per year in the mid-1980s; estimates show hundreds of millions to over half a billion per year at peak. The U.S., Saudi Arabia and Pakistan together channeled billions into the conflict. • Fact: By 1986 the U.S. provided high-tech weaponry such as the FIM-92 Stinger man-portable air-defense system; roughly 2,300 Stingers were shipped or transferred into the theater over the course of the program. Stingers decisively altered battlefield dynamics by neutralizing Soviet rotary and fixed-wing air superiority. The Pakistan conduit and selection of proxies • Fact: U.S. aid was routed through Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI). Pakistan’s ISI chose which Afghan commanders and factions received the lion’s share of support. • Effect: The ISI’s choices favored Islamist factions close to Zia-ul-Haq’s regime; crates, training and safe havens were allocated to groups that fit Pakistani strategic preferences, producing uneven empowerment among rebel factions. Training, networks and foreign volunteers • Fact: The covert effort built training camps, logistics pipelines, and cross-border sanctuaries on both sides of the Durand Line; these facilities trained Afghans and hosted foreign volunteers (Arab and other international fighters), creating transnational militant networks. (Field histories; Steve Coll; Peter Bergen) • Effect: The region’s militancy became transnational — fighters, ideas and tactics flowed from Afghan battlefields to other conflicts afterward. Tactical consequences — militarization and fragmentation • Fact: The flood of weapons and irregular training produced a heavily militarized society and empowered local warlords and factional leaders after the Soviet withdrawal. When Moscow left, those armed groups fought each other for control, shelling Kabul and destroying centralized governance. (Post-1989 Afghan civil war records) • Effect: A fractured polity and debilitated institutions made sustainable governance impossible and normalized the use of armed irregulars as political instruments. Not accidental blowback — a predictable result of explicit policy choices • Fact: U.S. policy makers explicitly prioritized defeating the Soviets using covert means — routing funds through Pakistan, arming ideologically committed factions, and supplying advanced systems (e.g., Stingers). These were deliberate, strategic decisions. • Fact: Numerous contemporaneous and retrospective observers (Pakistani leaders, U.S. diplomats, scholars) warned the U.S. about long-term risks; yet funding and transfers continued at scale. That sequence — intentional armament + choice of proxies + disregard for long-term stability — produced predictable outcomes that were foreseeable to policymakers. Legacy — why “ending terror” was never possible under this model • Fact: The mujahideen period institutionalized proxy war: permanent networks of fighters, caches of sophisticated weapons, madrassa recruitment pipelines and cross-border sanctuaries. These durable structures made periodic emergence of militant groups inevitable. (Historical analyses; Steve Coll; academic reviews) • Conclusion from the record (fact-based): When state policy deliberately builds militant capacity abroad for short-term geopolitical aims, it creates persistent militant ecosystems that are hard to extinguish — sustained violence becomes the default outcome, not an unforeseen accident. Considering that the US has continued to heavily fund these militant groups, it's clear that this is a deliberate M.O.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 described a moving meeting with chairman Eunice Khalis of the Islamic Union of Mujahideen of Afghanistan and others, noting continued strong U.S. support for the resistance and satisfaction with unity in choosing a chairman for the first time. The milestone demonstrates unity; the mujahideen have improved capabilities. Khalis’ delegation visits Washington after the November 10 UN General Assembly vote calling overwhelmingly for the withdrawal of all foreign troops from Afghanistan—the eighth such call since December. The withdrawal of Soviet forces is the key to resolving the Afghan crisis. The United States will strengthen support, aiming for "a genuinely independent Afghanistan, free from external interference, an Afghanistan whose people choose the type of government they wish, an Afghanistan to which the 4,000,000 refugees from Soviet aggression may return in safety and, yes, in honor." You are a nation of heroes.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, we've just held a very useful, and I might say brief, but also I will add a very moving discussion with chairman Eunice Khalis of the Islamic Union of Mujahideen of Afghanistan and other members of his distinguished delegation. I expressed our nation's continued strong support for the resistance and our satisfaction with the large step the Afghan resistance took toward unity in choosing a chairman for the first time. This new political milestone demonstrates that the people of Afghanistan speak with one voice in their opposition to the Soviet invasion and occupation of their homeland. This increasing unity has already made itself felt on the battlefield. During the past eighteen months, the mujahideen fighting inside the country have improved their weapons, tactics, and coordination. The result has been a a string of serious defeats for the Soviet elite units as well as many divisions from the Kabul army. Chairman Collies and his delegation are visiting Washington following the November 10 UN General Assembly vote, which, with a record vote once again, called overwhelmingly for the withdrawal of all foreign troops from Afghanistan. This is the eighth time since the December that the general assembly has decisively called upon the Soviet Union to pull its forces out of Afghanistan. And let there be no mistake about it, the withdrawal of Soviet forces is the key to resolving the Afghan crisis. Our other issues that have been raised to divert attention from this fact only extend the combat and prolong the suffering of the Afghan people. General secretary Gorbachev has publicly stated a Soviet readiness to withdraw. Both in April and September 1987, I asked the Soviet Union to set a date this year when that withdrawal would begin. I also stated that when the Soviet Union showed convincingly that it was ready for a genuine political settlement, The United States would be helpful. After all, the Soviet presence in Afghanistan is a major impediment to improve US Soviet relations, and we would like to remove it. The Soviets should want to do so as well. Unfortunately, the Soviet answer on a date for rapid withdrawal has been silence. Instead, we've seen the Kabul regime announce a phantom ceasefire and propose a transitional government, one that would leave this discredited and doomed group in control. These gambits have been rejected by the only voice that really counts, that of the Afghan people speaking through their resistance representatives. Any proposal unacceptable to the resistance is destined to fail. And as the resistance continues the fight, we and other responsible governments will stand by it. The support that The United States has been providing the resistance will be strengthened rather than diminished so that it can continue to fight effectively for freedom. A just struggle against foreign tyranny can count upon worldwide support, both political and material. The goal of The United States remains a genuinely independent Afghanistan, free from external interference, an Afghanistan whose people choose the type of government they wish, an Afghanistan to which the 4,000,000 refugees from Soviet aggression may return in safety and, yes, in honor. On behalf of the American people, I salute chairman Kalis, his delegation, and the people of Afghanistan themselves. You are a nation of heroes. Speaker 1: In the name of God, merciful and compassionate. As far as the Afghan problem is concerned, the president has shed light on some important points. I have no doubt that The US promises of support and commitment to the Afghan cause will be honored in the future as it has been in the past. I'm grateful for the opportunity to express the voice of the Afghan people to the world. This is an important opportunity for us. In Afghanistan, we have have more than 1,000,000 martyrs, and many children have been killed. Villages have been destroyed, and the war continues and intensifies. In the face of these sacrifices or these costs, we have continued our resistance, and we shall continue to do so. We the morale of our resistance is very high, and we shall continue with our struggle. Although the United Nations overwhelmingly has called for the withdrawal of the Soviet troops, unconditional withdrawal of Soviet troops, but the Soviets have continued the war, and this war, in our view, is likely to continue. In our view, the struggle in Afghanistan is not only for Afghanistan. The Soviets are using Afghanistan as a base for training their forces and using their weapons, but they also would like to use Afghanistan, should they be victorious, as a base from which they will threaten the Persian Gulf, the Middle East, and western interests in general. This is therefore an issue that involves not only the Afghans but the rest of the world, especially those who are seeking peace. As a result, it's important that these countries, we should continue their humanitarian and other support for the Afghan resistance and, in fact, should increase it. In Afghanistan, it's only the Afghan people that should determine the future government. We do not accept any right on this issue and do not accept interference by anyone as far as this issue is concerned. The world should rest assured that no matter what kind of regime the Afghans establish out of their own free will, that regime will not threaten anyone's interest and shall observe all international laws and live in peace with all its neighbors. And once again, want to reiterate that our struggle shall continue until the Soviets leave Afghanistan and until a government that the Afghans accept comes to power. We do not accept the preferences of others as far as our government is concerned. But we also would like to point out that we would like increased political support and recognition for our movement consistent with increased military achievements that we have on the battlefield. And then I'd like to call on the on the press to give adequate and and and correct information and analysis of what goes on in Afghanistan. That was the last point that the the chairman wants.

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

https://t.co/KsgQA3PMZ6

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

The Origin of Terror🧵 4. ISIS / ISIL — How U.S. & zionist Policy Created a Global Terror Machine Origin: Early 2000s — grew from post-2003 Iraq insurgency; exploded during the Syrian civil war (2011+). Key Point: ISIS didn’t emerge spontaneously. It was deliberately cultivated by U.S. foreign policy aligned with zionist strategic goals — destabilizing the Middle East, consolidating power, and controlling enemies of israel. This was a calculated move to reshape the region in israel’s favor, leveraging chaos as a tool for dominance while arming terrorist cells to attack countries that resist zionist control. Netanyahu once accused the Saudis of sending Gaza money for influence over Hamas. Every accusation with Netanyahu is a confession; he did as well. Immediate Causes (Documented Facts): zionist-Planned Invasion (2003): PNAC, a zionist neocon think tank, mapped Iraq’s invasion in 1998. Goal: not just oil — destabilize the region to protect israel, reshape power dynamics, and justify perpetual U.S. presence. PNAC’s founders, including Wolfowitz and Feith, were dual israeli-U.S. citizens with deep ties to the israeli military. Sectarian Governance: U.S.-installed Iraqi government, influenced by zionist advisors like Ahmed Chalabi, systematically marginalized Sunnis — grievances that ISIS exploited. Chalabi, an Iraqi exile with ties to israeli intelligence, played a key role in shaping U.S. policy. Al-Qaeda in Iraq: Abu Musab al-Zarqawi’s network, armed and trained via CIA remnants from Operation Cyclone, became ISIS’s operational core. Zarqawi’s fighters were initially backed by the CIA to destabilize Syria and Iran. Syrian Civil War (2011+): zionist-backed “regime change” efforts created safe havens for ISIS, HTS, and other jihadi factions. israel openly supported these groups as “moderate rebels” while bombing Syrian government forces. How ISIS Was Cultivated (Documented): Deliberate Dismantling: Bush-era neocons dissolved Iraqi institutions and army, creating a security vacuum designed to prevent any future Iraqi military challenge to israel. Proxy Wars: zionist-backed forces in Syria — including ex-Al-Qaeda affiliates — funneled weapons, fighters, and resources to ISIS. The CIA’s Operation Timber Sycamore, launched in 2012, supplied billions of dollars in arms to these groups. Financing ISIS: Gulf private donors connected to zionist networks, and international banks (Goldman Sachs, etc.) enabled ISIS access to cash, oil revenue, and smuggling profits. ISIS oil was sold through Turkey, with israeli companies acting as middlemen. Direct Obama-Era Support: Direct ISIS Funding: The Obama Administration knowingly allowed ISIS to sell oil to Turkey, with israeli companies acting as intermediaries. This wasn’t just indirect funding — ISIS directly profited from U.S.-enabled oil sales. Later sanctions were largely symbolic, doing nothing to disrupt the flow of resources. State-Sponsored Terrorism: The Obama Administration greenlit Qatar and Saudi Arabia’s funding of extremist groups that became ISIS, under the guise of “moderate rebel support.” U.S. Training for ISIS: ISIS commanders were trained in Jordan, receiving military skills they later used to expand the caliphate. This was direct U.S. support for ISIS leadership and operational capacity. (Timber Sycamore) Financing ISIS: Gulf private donors connected to zionist networks, and international banks (Goldman Sachs, etc.) enabled ISIS access to cash, oil revenue, and smuggling profits. ISIS oil was sold through Turkey, with israeli companies acting as middlemen. Trump Administration ISIS Oil Sales: Trump failed to stop ISIS from selling oil to Turkey, effectively funding the group. Israeli companies acted as middlemen, ensuring ISIS profited directly from stolen Syrian oil. Even later sanctions were meaningless—what does a “sanction” do to a terrorist group already making millions from illicit sales? Proxy Wars: Trump escalated support for Saudi Arabia and the UAE in Yemen, indirectly funding extremist groups that later merged with ISIS. This allowed ISIS to maintain influence and recruit across the region. Biden Administration Syria Airstrikes: Biden’s 2021 airstrikes targeted “Iran-backed militias” but killed civilians, fueling ISIS recruitment. This was a propaganda victory handed to ISIS and affiliated rebels. Continued Proxy Funding: Biden continued arming Saudi Arabia and the UAE, indirectly sustaining extremist groups tied to ISIS in Yemen. Israeli Involvement (Documented/Reported): Mossad Operations: Leaked intel shows ISIS commanders trained near the Golan Heights. Mossad agents were caught by Russian forces in Syria while evacuating ISIS leaders. Medical Support: israel treated wounded jihadists in its hospitals, including high-ranking ISIS commanders. Strategic Coordination: israeli airstrikes targeted Assad forces, indirectly aiding ISIS and allied militias. israel also provided intelligence to these groups. The Assad Reality: Secular Government: Assad’s secular government protected minorities and resisted zionist-backed regime change. Majority Jihadi Fighters: Most Syrians opposing Assad in conflict zones were jihadi fighters funded and armed by israel and U.S. proxies. Double Standards: When these groups attack Syria, Lebanon, or resist israel — they’re labeled “terrorists.” When zionist networks fund and arm them — they’re called “rebels fighting for freedom.” Same fighters. Different PR. Big Picture: Engineered Chaos: ISIS was engineered, not accidental. Terror is a tool: U.S. & israel use jihadist proxies to weaken anti-zionist regimes, justify endless wars, and expand influence. Media Obfuscation: Western media obscures this, framing Assad as a tyrant and jihadis as “moderates.” Assad’s Resistance: Assad fought these same terror groups that israel funded. His forces have been the primary bulwark against ISIS expansion. Conclusion: ISIS and affiliated jihadi groups are products of zionist-aligned strategy and U.S. intervention. Chaos, terror, and regime destabilization are features, not bugs, of foreign policy. ISIS is not a natural phenomenon but a weapon of war crafted by zionist interests to reshape the Middle East. The next time you hear about “terror attacks,” remember — it’s not just random violence, it’s a calculated tool of zionist power.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Discussion centers on subversion and thwarting plots against the state of Israel and, publicly, what they call the Mossad. It was hard to answer because 'you can't pick up the phone book.' 'There's no, Langley in, in Israel'—so they couldn't simply look up 'CIA or Mossad.' They asked, 'What shall we call it in English?' 'Mossad is institute,' but they wondered, 'when they write a letter to their friends in the CIA or the British intelligence, what do they call themselves?' It took a while, 'a matter of asking the prime minister's spokesman,' since officially 'the Mossad is under the prime minister's office.' He 'sort of wondered why you wanna know and all that,' so they explained, and he came up with 'the Israeli Secret Intelligence Service.' 'If it were to have initials, it would be ISIS. Just simple words like that.'
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Them, subversion, trying to foil plots against the state of Israel, political plots, others. You tell the story about how you try to find out what the what they call the Mossad when they deal with, publicly? I thought it was a reasonable question, but the trouble is, you can't pick up the phone book. There's no, Langley in, in Israel, and you can look up, you know, CIA or in our case, the Mossad. We thought we should ask, What shall we call it in English? You can translate the Hebrew words, as I said, Mossad is institute, but when they write a letter to their friends in the CIA or the British intelligence, what do they call themselves? It took a while. It was a matter of asking the prime minister's spokesman, the best you could do because officially, the Mossad is under the prime minister's office. And I think he sort of wondered why you wanna know and all that, so we explained. And he came up with the Israeli Secret Intelligence Service. I mean, if it were to have initials, it would be ISIS. Just simple words like that.

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

https://t.co/7zEVo28zYw

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

🧵 5. HAMAS — Resistance & Israeli Occupation Origin (1987): Hamas emerged during the First Intifada as the Palestinian branch of the Muslim Brotherhood. Israeli occupation and U.S. complicity in land theft and dehumanization created the conditions for Hamas to thrive. Unlike the "rebel" groups armed by israel and the U.S., Hamas is a genuine resistance movement born from Palestinian suffering and the resistance of armed aggressive military occupation. Documented Israeli Role (1970s–1980s): Israel didn't just "permit" Hamas's growth—it actively cultivated it as a counterweight to secular Palestinian nationalism. Israeli officials licensed Hamas's founder, Sheikh Ahmed Yassin, to build mosques, schools, and charities in Gaza. This wasn’t a mistake; it was a calculated move to divide Palestinians and maintain israeli dominance while giving israel the ability to claim Hamas is using "human shields" and "putting bases under schools/hospitals" and similar tactics. From the start, Israel's plan was to divide Palestine by creating, funding and radicalizing terrorist cells within Palestine to justify attacking them - taking their land - and apparently, exterminating the entire population. As evidenced by their recent and numerous statements indicating that even if Hamas releases the hostages there will be no cease fire. Key israeli officials going all the way back to the beginning of the occupation stated public that their goal was the removal of all Arabs in israel. How That Policy Functioned: Legal Recognition: Israel gave Hamas's Islamic charity network (Mujama al-Islamiya) official status, allowing it to expand under israeli oversight. Strategic Funding: Some Hamas institutions received resources or approvals because israeli planners believed they would undermine the PLO/Fatah. Public Admission: Israeli insiders later admitted this was a deliberate strategy to weaken secular Palestinian leaders.📺🧵 Growth Into Politics & Governance: Social Welfare: Hamas built its base through funding schools, hospitals, and welfare programs—filling gaps left by Israeli occupation and U.S. sanctions with money from Qatar, Saudi Arabia and israel. Democratic Victory: In 2006, Hamas won Palestinian legislative elections fair and square. Israel and the U.S. responded by cutting off aid and imposing a blockade. Governance: After violent clashes with Fatah, Hamas took control of Gaza and maintained order despite Israeli attacks and economic strangulation. Context: Hamas's "appeal" isn’t about “terrorism”—it’s about resistance to occupation, settlement expansion, and failed negotiations. Israel and the U.S. arm and train jihadist groups and ISIS in Syria and call them rebels while they attack Syrian women and children but then call Hamas "terrorists" for resisting the terrorism of the israeli occupation. Hamas has protected Palestinian civilians while israel bombs them. The exact opposite of israel's claims such as those made by Mike Huckabee last week.📽️in🧵 On September 12, 2001, Hamas representative Abdel Aziz Rantisi said that "the US reaps what it sows". He further stated that while Hamas could not approve of killing innocents, the United States was responsible for its own misery due to its support for israel and its actions against Arabs and Muslims. An understandable position considering the millions of Arabs and Muslims killed by the US and Israel in their never ending war campaign and occupation; and a testament to their overall restraint and nature. Further Context: Mia Shem stated that Hamas treated her well and only raped her with their eyes. When she returned to isreal she was drugged and raped by her gym instructor. 📺🧵 A fairly common practice in israel, which has one of the highest pedophile and rapist populations per capita in the world. Israel was caught brutally raping Palestinian prisoners on camera with police clubs. When they were punished (for getting caught) there was a riot to release them because "they have a right to rape". See: July 2024 Sde Teiman Incident International Designations: The U.S., EU, and israel label Hamas “terrorist” because it fights back against occupation. But Hamas has also negotiated ceasefires and shown restraint. They've agreed many times to a release of the hostages and Netanyahu intentionally ignores the offers, instead spreading propaganda claiming he's asking for peace and to "release the hostages". Meanwhile, israel kills tens of thousands of Palestinian civilians with impunity. Speculative Assertions: Elements within israel allowed or manipulated the 10/7 attacks to justify another war against Palestinians. An assertion made by Charlie Kirk before his assassination. The body of evidence that implicates israeli involvement, or at the very least that they knew ahead of time and allowed it to happen, continues to accumulate as insiders step forward and give their testimonies. Considering israel's history of creating and arming terrorist groups, how do we know that it was Hamas and not an israeli created cell that attacked on 10/7? As Netanyahu said "Democracies don't go to war easily. Sometimes you have to bomb them into going to war". There were large protests in israel leading up to 10/7 attack; protesting Netanyahu's judicial overhaul plan. Some 200k or more israelis showed up to protest Netanyahu. Conveniently for him, israel was attacked. Big Picture: By cultivating Hamas as a counterweight, israel created a force it later struggled to control. Hamas’s resistance is a response to occupation and systematic oppression—not a product of random violence. Conclusion: Historical records show israel cultivated the conditions for Hama's rise. The ongoing occupation, blockade, and attacks on civilians are the real aggressions. The evidence is undeniable. 📺Sep 22, 2025

Video Transcript AI Summary
"The UK led the way on Sunday recognizing a Palestinian state followed by Canada, Australia, and Portugal. In the face of the growing horror in the Middle East, we are acting to keep alive the possibility of peace and a two stage solution. Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu says there will not be a Palestinian state in the West Bank. I have a clear message to those leaders who recognize the Palestinian state after the terrible massacre of October 7. You are giving a huge price to terrorism, and it will not happen. There will be no Palestinian state West of the Jordan."
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The UK led the way on Sunday recognizing a Palestinian state followed by Canada, Australia, and Portugal. Speaker 1: In the face of the growing horror in the Middle East, we are acting to keep alive the possibility of peace and a two stage solution. That means a safe and secure Israel alongside a viable Palestinian state. Speaker 0: Unilateral recognition of a Palestinian state and the situation in Gaza are expected to dominate this week's UN general assembly. Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu says there will not be a Palestinian state in the West Bank. Speaker 2: At the UN, I will present the truth. This is Israel's truth, but it is the objective truth in our righteous struggle against the forces of evil and our vision for real peace, peace from strength. Speaker 0: Netanyahu said the recognition delivers one message. Speaker 3: I Speaker 2: have a clear message to those leaders who recognize the Palestinian state after the terrible massacre of October 7. You are giving a huge price to terrorism, and I have another message for you. It will not happen. There will be no Palestinian state West of the Jordan. Speaker 0: Despite the argument that the decision would sideline Hamas and bring peace, Hamas took credit for the recognition, saying it's because of their October 7 invasion and massacre of Israelis. Palestinians in Ramallah welcomed the decision and made their ultimate goal clear. We also hope to see a complete Palestinian state from the sea to the river. Israeli legal expert Eugene Kantorovich says supporters can say what they want, but a Palestinian state doesn't exist. Speaker 3: They have complete independence, autonomy. Israel is not controlling their lives. So, what would a state give them that they don't have now? The ability to buy weapons on the international market and the ability to open their borders and bring in jihadis from around the world. So, imagine October 7, except this time, instead of machine guns and gliders, they have airplanes and artillery and millions of people who have come to join them on jihad from around the world. Speaker 0: Therefore, he says, Israel cannot allow the establishment of a Palestinian state. In Israel, there is talk of extending Israeli sovereignty over biblical Judea and Samaria, also known as the West Bank, thereby preventing the establishment of a Palestinian state. Netanyahu says he'll deliver Israel's official response after he meets with president Trump following his UN speech. Julie Stall, CBN News, Jerusalem.

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

@clevernameer 😂

FurkanGozukara
Posted - March 20, 2026 at 10:44 AM
Saved - March 21, 2026 at 8:09 PM

@FurkanGozukara - Furkan Gözükara

OMG this is insane! A former CIA operative just admitted on camera that the US intentionally armed and relied on Al-Qaeda and ISIS in Syria just to serve Israel's geopolitical interests against Iran. They literally created the ISIS caliphate! https://t.co/4Oa4Y9FGya

View Full Interactive Feed