TruthArchive.ai - Related Post Feed

NAffects
Posted - April 25, 2023 at 8:04 PM
Saved - April 27, 2023 at 2:44 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The TwitterFiles reveal a concerning alliance between academics, journalists, intelligence operatives, military personnel, government bureaucrats, and NGO workers. Tech companies collaborate with each other and the state, while NGOs make blacklists of wrongthinkers. The collapse of public trust in experts and institutions led to the creation of a political monopoly. The Western antidisinformation field is betraying human rights activists fighting against online government repression. It's time to defund the antidisinformation industry and put the nongovernment back into NGO.

@NAffects - NetworkAffects

"1.TWITTER FILES #20 The Information Cartel"

@NAffects - NetworkAffects

2. My name is Andrew Lowenthal. For almost 18 years, I was Executive Director of @EngageMedia, an NGO devoted to protecting digital rights and freedoms. In recent years, I watched with concern and then despair as a dramatic change swept through my field.

@NAffects - NetworkAffects

3. Organizations & peers began de-emphasizing freedom of expression, instead promoting surveillance & censorship to combat 'disinformation'. Here Automated Controversy Detection & the Center for an Informed Public boast of their online monitoring capabilities.

@NAffects - NetworkAffects

4. I knew things were bad. When I started work on the #TwitterFiles, I learned: they're far worse. The Files show an uncanny alliance of academics, journalists, intelligence operatives, military personnel, government bureaucrats, NGO workers and more. Some I know personally.

@NAffects - NetworkAffects

5. I had always understood "civil society" to mean "not the military." The former exists to check the latter. So I was shocked to see the depth of collaboration. For instance, "civil society" groups coordinating with Pentagon officials in an "election tabletop" exercise. Why?

@NAffects - NetworkAffects

6. Also startling: Twitter emails and Slack communications suggesting heightened levels of data access for the military. Or military contractors like Mitre being part of the Aspen Institute's "Information Disorder" report along with NGO and academic colleagues.

@NAffects - NetworkAffects

7. In a functioning democracy there’s dynamic tension between government, civil society organizations, news media, and industry, all advancing their own interests, in theory keeping one another honest. In the #TwitterFiles we find them all working together, cartel-style.

@NAffects - NetworkAffects

8. In the #TwitterFiles, tech firms collaborate with each other, and the state. Companies organize "IndustrySynch," "Industry comms," "pre-sync," and "Multi-Party Information Sharing," collaborating on a "whole range" of subjects, from election security to state-media labeling.

@NAffects - NetworkAffects

9. Tech companies not only collaborate on content, they gather regularly for "private sector engagement" with the FBI, DOD, DHS, House and Senate Intel Committees, and others, each agency getting its own meetings:

@NAffects - NetworkAffects

10. Here Twitter staff ask for Twitter General Counsel (& former FBI Deputy General Counsel) Jim Baker's blessing for EIP and Virality Project partner Graphika to "inform their partners in USG 3-5 days before publication" of a report detailing Pentagon disinformation operations.

@NAffects - NetworkAffects

11. Graphika receives money from the Pentagon, Navy, and Air Force, while simultaneously supporting human rights organizations such as Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch. Working with both the perpetrators & those representing the victims is very 2023.

@NAffects - NetworkAffects

12. During the War on Terror the DHS was harshly criticized by progressives for civil rights violations and targeting of Muslims. Now DHS sub-entities like CISA work closely with progressive tech. Here Twitter warmly welcomes a DHS/CISA staffer's job application.

@NAffects - NetworkAffects

13. Other DHS staff such as Matt Masterson become fellows at the Stanford Internet Observatory and work on the Virality Project's censorship of "true stories of vaccine side effects." The revolving door between academia, government, NGO's and BigTech is endless.

@NAffects - NetworkAffects

14. As reported by @shellenbergerMD, The Aspen Institute combined WaPo, NYT, Rollingstone, NBC, CNN, Twitter, Facebook, Stanford, and "anti-disinfo" NGOs like FirstDraft to practice an oddly prescient "hack and leak" exercise on the Hunter Biden laptop BEFORE its release.

@NAffects - NetworkAffects

15. When the Hunter Biden laptop story broke, the existence of the recent tabletop exercise became instant important news - but the journalists who’d attended stayed mum, perhaps granting off-the-record privileges to the organizers.

@NAffects - NetworkAffects

16. "We totally blew it on our Burisma tabletop this summer — we didn't have Trump announcing "Lock him up" until day *nine* of the Burisma information operation" writes Garret Graff, the Aspen Institute’s Director of Cyber Initiatives.

@NAffects - NetworkAffects

17. "LOL! Ok, off the record, what's our working theory here of what happened?" replies Noah Shachtman, current Rolling Stone Editor-in-Chief.

@NAffects - NetworkAffects

18. Last week Secretary of State Anthony Blinken was alleged to have instigated the "Russian" "hack" letter signed by 50 former intel officials. At RightsCon, civil society's biggest digital rights event, Blinken spoke on 'disinformation' with Nobel Prize winner Maria Ressa.

@NAffects - NetworkAffects

19. See how it works? The people accusing others of "disinformation" RUN the biggest disinformation campaigns themselves.

@NAffects - NetworkAffects

20. Anti-disinformation conferences teem with Beltway journalists - the same names from the Post, Times, Atlantic, and NBC, over and over - but these proto-censorship workshops are often off the record, like defense or intel confabs. Reporters are participants, not adversaries.

@NAffects - NetworkAffects

21. The scale of funding is similarly beyond shocking. Governments and foundations pour millions - one company alone reportedly won $979 million from the Pentagon - into "anti-disinformation" firms and NGOs.

@NAffects - NetworkAffects

22. Craig Newmark is reported to have given more than $200m to journalism projects, (by another estimate $338m) including the founding funds for the Stanford Internet Observatory.

@NAffects - NetworkAffects

23. Whether it's the ADL with election miscreants, the Alethea Group counting China-linked accounts "amplifying known right-wing figures," or the Atlantic Council monitoring "opposition activity" around the Iran deal, the NGOs make blacklists of wrongthinkers:

@NAffects - NetworkAffects

24. The #TwitterFiles are riddled with removal demands from opaque cut-out organizations like the Center for Countering Digital Hate, whose mysterious funding never troubles either Twitter execs or the reporters who transmit their demands.

@NAffects - NetworkAffects

25. Media forwards the blacklist demands to industry:

@NAffects - NetworkAffects

26. Industry folds, and all the people from these groups - the same names, over and over - get together for hors d'oeuvres at cozy conferences with NATO STRATCOM, the Center for European Policy Analysis, the Carnegie Endowment, etc. One big club.

@NAffects - NetworkAffects

27. Here 12 Attorneys General ask Twitter to deplatform the 'disinformation dozen". Twitter jumps into action to help.

@NAffects - NetworkAffects

28. Nor was I prepared to read bluntly Orwellian communications like Twitter's cheery "Visibility Filtering Year in Review" Newsletter, boasting of new innovations in "soft intervention" and the "Visibility Filtering Library."

@NAffects - NetworkAffects

29. More surprising was the violation of commonly held privacy values. Meedan (one of Twitter’s 4 main 'anti-disinformation' partners on Covid) had an Omidyar funded project called CryptoChat that advocated peering into private, encrypted messages to weed out "misinformation".

@NAffects - NetworkAffects

30. In a similar vein The Algorthmic Transparency Institute (a core Virality Project partner) conducted Stasi-style “civic listening” and “automated collection of data” from “closed messaging apps” to hunt down "problematic content" through its Junkipedia initiative.

@NAffects - NetworkAffects

31. NGOs shill for corporate products. The Public Good Projects (a Twitter's COVID 'misinformation' partner) ran initiatives to "increase vaccine demand". @lhfang's #TwitterFiles revealed BioNTech sought Twitter's help to repress a vaccine equity campaign. https://theintercept.com/2023/01/16/twitter-covid-vaccine-pharma/ https://theintercept.com/2023/01/16/twitter-covid-vaccine-pharma/

Covid-19 Drugmakers Pressured Twitter to Censor Activists Pushing for Generic Vaccine The social media pressure campaign was just a part of the pharmaceutical industry’s successful lobbying blitz to retain patents — and make record profits. theintercept.com

@NAffects - NetworkAffects

32. The story of the #TwitterFiles and the Censorship-Industrial Complex (CIC) is really the story of the collapse of public trust in experts and institutions, and how those experts struck back, by trying to pool their remaining influence into a political monopoly:

@NAffects - NetworkAffects

33. In the #TwitterFiles we repeatedly see terms like "infodemic," "information pollution," and "information disorder," which express elite panic over the great technological explosion that has radically expanded the "contagion" of democratic participation.

@NAffects - NetworkAffects

34. The Western "anti-disinformation" field, with its Government collaboration and calls for more state control over speech and expression, is betraying human rights activists around the world, who fight against online government repression.

@NAffects - NetworkAffects

35. Let's put the "non-government" back into NGO and defund the "anti-disinformation" industry. After all, the information control shoe will one day be on the other foot.

@NAffects - NetworkAffects

36. Read the full essay at https://www.racket.news/publish/post/115608327. With additional research from @mtaibbi and @bergerbell

pepedownunder
Posted - July 1, 2023 at 10:40 AM
Saved - July 26, 2023 at 10:23 AM

@pepedownunder - Teresa

WHO pandemic treaty is cancelled! In rare win vs. Big Pharma…. WHO has backed down on proposed amendments for mandatory vaccines & lockdowns - Australian MP Malcom Roberts

Video Transcript AI Summary
This week, the United Nations World Health Organization dropped proposed changes to their health regulations that would have made them mandatory for member states like Australia. These changes would have given the World Health Organization unprecedented power over issues such as proof of vaccination, quarantine procedures, and citizen travel. The proposal was heavily criticized and ultimately rejected. The idea of a global digital vaccine passport was also scrapped due to ethical and discriminatory concerns. The International Health Regulations Review Committee will now focus solely on actual public health emergencies rather than potential risks. This victory is seen as a win for Australian sovereignty and a rejection of unelected foreign bureaucrats.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This week represents a rare victory for Australian sovereignty, a victory for common sense, decency, and humanity, and a victory against the unelected, unaccountable foreign bureaucrats at the United Nations World Health Organization. You'll recall the World Health Organization proposed to change their health regulations that guide member states in the event of a disease outbreak like COVID. From guiding member states to being mandatory on member states, including Australia. This would have represented a complete destruction of Australian sovereignty and a fundamental imagining of the powers of the World Health Organization. Last December, the Liberal National Morrison Joyce Government voted in favor of these changes, yet many sensible countries voted against, and the proposal was lost. Undaunted, the United Nations World Health Organization tried again this year. After months of heavy criticism, 1 nation and those opposing these measures have had a huge win. The final report from the International Health Regulations Review Committee released this week has dropped the proposed changes. The United Nations World Health Organization will supreme and advisory body. Dystopian demands such as allowing the World Health Organization to make binding health orders over state and federal control have been tossed out. This includes the proposed powers that would have allowed the World Health Organization to control systems for proof of vaccination or vaccination status, quarantine procedures, citizen travel and mobility, forced vaccination, lockouts, lockdowns, mandatory detention, and other completely unacceptable infringements on people. Gone is the universal health passport or vaccine passport that was going to control the ability of citizens to travel between countries in a permanent capacity. It was decided that this would raise ethical and discriminatory concerns. A global digital vaccine passport will no longer be developed under the committee's powers for now. The committee will remain confined to actual public health emergencies rather than potential health risk undefined.
ABridgen
Posted - August 8, 2023 at 10:57 AM
Saved - August 8, 2023 at 2:41 PM

@ABridgen - Andrew Bridgen

Letter to Rishi Sunak with all the evidence sent yesterday. Awaiting a reply. @RishiSunak @Conservatives

canindependent
Posted - September 14, 2023 at 4:50 PM
Saved - September 15, 2023 at 3:45 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Dr. Kulvinder Kaur Gill, a vocal Ontario physician, faced disciplinary proceedings for opposing COVID19 policies. However, the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario (CPSO) surprisingly withdrew its case against her. Despite a scheduled 15-day hearing in 2024, the CPSO decided to halt the proceedings. For more details, refer to the withdrawal request letter: [link].

@canindependent - The Canadian Independent

CPSO Withdraws Disciplinary Proceedings Against Very Outspoken Ontario Dr. Kulvinder Kaur Gill Who Opposed Covid Policies. Dr. Gill, a physician practicing in the Toronto area, has garnered a substantial following on X and publicly voiced her opposition to COVID-19 policies. Although she had a 15-day full hearing scheduled for 2024, the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario (CPSO) has unexpectedly requested to withdraw its proceedings and case against her. You can review the withdrawal request letter at the link below. https://assets.nationbuilder.com/thedemocracyfund/pages/429/attachments/original/1694698608/20230912-Ltr-Tribunal_Redacted.pdf?1694698608…

DiedSuddenly_
Posted - September 27, 2023 at 1:29 AM
Saved - September 27, 2023 at 2:40 PM

@DiedSuddenly_ - DiedSuddenly

Nurse fired for not getting the jab. This is true courage!

Video Transcript AI Summary
A nurse is being escorted out of Kaiser Permanente Hospital for refusing to get vaccinated due to her religious beliefs. She expresses frustration at not receiving an explanation for why her religious exemption was denied. She emphasizes the importance of religious freedom and encourages others to consider what matters to them. The nurse has been placed on unpaid administrative leave and is willing to sacrifice her safety and security for her freedom. She has been a COVID nurse since the beginning of the pandemic and is determined to continue her work elsewhere. She urges viewers to think about their own values and the significance of freedom.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Nurse loses her job because she wouldn't take shots. Thank you. I am being escorted out of Kaiser Permanente Hospital for, my religious beliefs because I don't want to get a jab. And, I asked all day for someone to explain to me why my sincerely held Religious beliefs are not good enough for Kaiser. And no one was able to do that for me. So now they're escorting me out because I wanted an answer. And I'm not leaving without an answer. And I have some nurses here who are standing with me in solidarity, and I appreciate that. And I just want all of you to count the cost. I want you to watch this and think what really matters to me. Because I am willing to lose my safety and security, my house, everything for my freedom. And I want you to think about that. Let me ask you, do you believe in religious freedom? Kaiser doesn't. Do you believe in religious freedom? Do you believe in religious freedom? Well, Kaiser doesn't believe in religious freedom, because they are not accepting my religious exemption based on my sincerely held religious beliefs. Going up. That's a problem. Love you. All day, I've been asking for someone from HR to come talk to me about why my religious exemption was not good enough Kaiser. So I've been asking and asking, and no one will give me an answer. So I that was at 10:45 this morning I was told I'm now being placed on unpaid, administrative leave for no reason. I showed up to work this morning. Happy to work. All I want to do is work. All I want to do is work. Since the beginning, I've been a COVID nurse since the beginning when we didn't know what was going on, When we didn't know what kind of rooms we're walking into. But that's what we do. We're nurses. I'll keep doing that just somewhere else. But I want you all to think about what matters to you, because this matters to me. Freedom matters to me. Because when it's a slippery slope and you start
drsimonegold
Posted - October 13, 2023 at 5:16 PM
Saved - October 15, 2023 at 3:55 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Employees fired by NYC Department of Education for refusing COVID-19 vaccine must be reinstated with backpay. Judge rules denials of religious exemptions to teachers unconstitutional. A significant victory for medical freedom!

@drsimonegold - Dr. Simone Gold

A New York state judge ruled that employees fired by the New York City Department of Education for refusing to get the COVID-19 “vaccine” must be reinstated with backpay. State Supreme Court Judge Ralph J. Porzio found that the city’s denials of religious exemptions to certain city teachers was unconstitutional. This is a big win for medical freedom!

Video Transcript AI Summary
A New York state judge ruled that 10 employees fired by the New York City Department of Education for refusing the COVID-19 vaccine must be reinstated with back pay. The judge found that the city's denial of religious exemptions to certain teachers was unconstitutional and arbitrary. The judge stated that there was no rational basis for not allowing unvaccinated teachers among primarily unvaccinated students. The judge also referenced Mayor Eric Adams' lifting of the vaccine mandate for some private employees, suggesting that the mandate for public workers was arbitrary. Many workers lost their jobs for not adhering to the mandate. The ruling provides hope for those seeking justice through the courts.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hey, freedom lovers. This is doctor Peterson Peo with America's Front Line Doctors bringing you today's daily dose. So a New York state judge ruled 2 weeks ago that 10 employees fired by the New York City Department of Education for refusing to get the COVID nineteen vaccine have to be reinstated with back pay. Wonderful. State Supreme Court Judge Ralph Porzio found that the city's denials of religious exemptions, which by the way is illegal, to certain city teachers was unconstitutional, capricious, and arbitrary. This is what he had to say. This court sees no rational basis were not allowing unvaccinated classroom teachers in amongst an admitted population of primarily unvaccinated students. As such the decision to summarily deny the classroom teachers amongst the panel petitioners based on an undue hardship without any further evidence of individualized analysis is arbitrary, capricious, and unreasonable. As such, each classroom teacher amongst the panel petitioners is entitled to a religious exemption from the vaccine mandate. As part of his ruling, the judge made made reference to mayor Eric Adams' lifting of a vaccine mandate for some private employees in 22, notably celebrities and athletes. Months, he said the decision was evidence that the mandate for public workers was done on an arbitrary basis. MPs reports indicated that thousands of workers, teachers, and other staffers lost their jobs through not adhering to the banned it. So finally, justice is starting to be served. Because we know, forcing people to get an experimental drug is illegal. So for those of you out there who are still struggling, the more you're up, go to the courts, and that's going to be your avenue, though it is slow, it'll still be your avenue for justice. Ladies and gentlemen, only the truth will set you free. Stay tuned for the next daily dose.
PaulMitchell_AB
Posted - December 6, 2023 at 6:29 PM
Saved - December 6, 2023 at 7:18 PM

@PaulMitchell_AB - Paul Mitchell

"A doctor in B.C. has lost an appeal that would have allowed her to keep her hospital privileges despite not taking the COVID-19 vaccine." BC has a desperate shortage of doctors, but they still won't allow staff who refuse the harmful jab. Insanity. https://www.theepochtimes.com/world/bc-doctor-loses-appeal-to-retain-hospital-privileges-lost-over-refusal-of-covid-19-vaccine-5541809

BC Doctor Loses Appeal to Retain Hospital Privileges Lost Over Refusal of COVID-19 Vaccine The appeal board says although Dr. Theresa Szezepaniak has the right to refuse the shot, it doesn’t mean she is 'immune from the consequences of her decision.' theepochtimes.com
ShaunRickard67
Posted - December 21, 2023 at 4:34 AM
Saved - December 22, 2023 at 1:13 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Should we apply to have our Vaccine Travel Mandates lawsuit heard by the Supreme Court of Canada? Check out the Federal Court of Appeal's decision and our bombshell evidence. We've also filed a second lawsuit against the government. Read our statement of claim and open letters to key individuals. Get a full case breakdown and summary from our video with @jordanbpeterson, @rupasubramanya, and @PardyBruce. Donate to our legal fund and join our private Facebook group for updates. Follow me on Instagram and Twitter for more information.

@ShaunRickard67 - Shaun Rickard

URGENT UPDATE - Vaccine Travel Mandates Lawsuits We need to hear your thoughts & feedback ASAP - Should we file and apply to have our landmark Vaccine Travel Mandates lawsuit heard by the Supreme Court of Canada? RELATED CASE & EVIDENCE LINKS 1. The Federal Court of Appeal released its decision: https://x.com/ShaunRickard67/status/1722716504335032758?s=20 2. Our bombshell evidence: https://x.com/ShaunRickard67/status/1732050791760871645?s=20 3. JENNIFER LITTLE - Career Bureaucrat - Headed up the secretive & covert 20-person 'Covid Recovery Team' at Transport Canada: https://x.com/ShaunRickard67/status/1689013817101910016?s=20 4. DR. CELIA LOURENCO - Director General, Health Canada - Personally approved the use of ALL C-19 vaccines in Canada: https://x.com/ShaunRickard67/status/1689630999930380288?s=20 ANOOUNCEMENT - WE JUST FILED A SECOND LAWSUIT AGAINST THE GOVERNMENT: https://x.com/ShaunRickard67/status/1730061973369311345?s=20 6. Statement of claim we filed for our new lawsuit on November 29th, 2023: https://statementofclaimfiledtofederalcourt.tiiny.site/ 7. Open letter to Jennifer Little, Head of the Covid Recovery Team (Official title at the time of the Vaccine Travel Mandates) and Dr. Celia Lourenco, Director General, Health Canada (Official title at the time of the Vaccine Travel Mandates): https://x.com/ShaunRickard67/status/1732187127624978603?s=20 8. Open letter to @PierrePoilievre and @CPC_HQ: https://x.com/ShaunRickard67/status/1713591822134526188?s=20 9. Full case breakdown and summary with @jordanbpeterson, @rupasubramanya and @PardyBruce: https://youtu.be/zQLMctYO36E?si=SicOSk4KwZq0qGdy Donate to our legal fund here: https://www.givesendgo.com/TheCanadianLitigationAndFreedomFund Our private Facebook group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/durhamdissident My Instagram account: https://www.instagram.com/therealshaunrickard/ My X (Twitter) account:

Video Transcript AI Summary
Sean Rickard, along with his co-applicant Carl Harrison, filed the first-ever lawsuit against the government for vaccine travel mandates. They have faced numerous challenges and motions, but have won most of them. However, their case was deemed moot by the Federal Court of Appeal due to a lack of public interest. Despite this setback, they have filed a second lawsuit as a damages claim. They are considering taking the case to the Supreme Court of Canada but are facing financial challenges. They are seeking donations to continue their fight. They believe they have evidence that proves the government had no scientific rationale for implementing the mandates. They are asking for feedback and support from the public.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Welcome back. For those of you who don't know me and know or might be new here, and just started following along, my name is Sean Rickard. My co applicant and friend, Carl Harrison and I filed the 1st ever lawsuit against the government for the vaccine travel mandates, as a Charter Challenge. And, that case then was, followed by, Brian Peckford and Maxime Bernier through JCCF, who also filed lawsuits, and our friend, Nabil, out of Quebec, a lawyer there who is representing himself. The 4 cases at some point into the process were ordered to run concurrently. So all these 4 cases we've been appearing simultaneously online and also in person. The situation that we're in right now, basically fast Forward from December 24, 2021, when we originally filed this, we're now coming into our 2nd year. As of December 24, it'll be our 2nd year fighting this 1st lawsuit, which has been a hell of a ride. We've had motions thrown at us By the attorney general and the crown, we've had, our our evidence attempt to be, dismissed. We fought and won pretty much every motion that they've thrown at us to try and exhaust our resources and our funding and everything else and except for 1. And that was the, the final ruling by judge Gagne on a motion that the attorney general Asses, filed against us for mootness, saying that the case, because the mandates now have been Revoked, which they haven't. They've only been suspended. And the lack of public interest, they're saying that, The case is moot. We took that to the Federal Court of Appeal. We were unsuccessful there. They have, they did concur with, Justice Gagne that the case was moot, again, based on lack of public interest, Which means they didn't feel it was worth the expense to the courts to have this case heard despite The fact that it affected the lives and negatively impacted the lives of CAD 6,000,000, 6,000,000 plus in actual fact. So we're we're in a situation now where, we went to the Federal Court of Appeal hearing. The they made it public via Zoom. We were able to get 20,000 people to register to watch this hearing via Zoom. Now for those of you unaware, may not sound like a large number to you, but it's the largest number of people ever to attend a court hearing in Canada at the Federal Court. So for them to turn around and declare this to be, to for there to be a lack of public In this case, in this lawsuit is absolutely bullshit. I have no other word for it. It's insane. But And nevertheless, we're we're gonna prevail. We have to make a decision now, however, on this on our first case as to whether we're gonna seed to the Supreme Court of Canada. The other 3 cases, Brian Peckford, Maxime Bernier and Nabil, they've all, They're not going to go any further. We're the only case going. We are the we were the lead case out of the 4 during the proceedings. Also, it was our, lawyer, very talented young lawyer, Sampras Velas, that was able to uncover the evidence that we have that we feel is imperative to be heard in a public hearing in a federal court. We uncovered the fact There was none. There was no scientific evidence, there was no scientific rationale, there was no data, nothing provided by PHACC or any of the other health health organizations in Canada to to justify implementing the vaccine travel mandate. So we have all that. The only problem is we haven't had that evidence heard yet and we need to get that in front of a judge. So which is why we've just filed, Excuse me. On November 29th, our 2nd lawsuit, which is now a damages claim, we filed Again, on November 29th, and we're hoping to hear back. The attorney general has accepted our challenge, so to speak, and we will be going to court on that. However, the Supreme Court of Canada hearing if we're if we're gonna if we're gonna file with the Supreme Court of Canada, We have to make a decision as to whether this is financially possible, whether we have the resources and the people to do this. But we feel that it's necessary that we need to file this and take it as far as we can, if for no other reason than To get it down on the record and down in the history books as for what it is, we have a ton of evidence, that proves that the government did not have any scientific rationale, or or data or anything to support them invoking the vaccine travel mandates. And, we did, probably was it just over 2 months of cross examinations of 16 government witnesses and the evidence that we uncovered from a lot of the senior public health officials including doctor Celia Lourenco, who authorized the use of all vaccines in Canada. You can look her up on my Twitter page. There's a ton of information in there on her and another bureaucrat by the name of Jennifer Little who was tasked with, running an organization called the COVID recovery team, who were like a covert group whose job it was to try and find some science. Unfortunately, they failed, never came up with any of that and yet they implemented the mandates anyway and and prevented over 6,000,000 Canadians from being able to travel, within Canada and from leaving the country as well. So we feel it's imperative that we get this evidence in front of a judge as a as a secondary sort of backup measure. We have filed the 2nd lawsuit on November 29 this year, 2023. And, we're going to be heading into court I'm probably in the sometime in the New Year with that and we have to make a decision as of January 8, 2024, so this coming January, whether we're going to file with the Supreme Court of Canada. The biggest problem we have right now is fundraising has pretty much died this year. And the reason being obviously, I would imagine is the economy. We also there's a lot of There's a bit of a lack of interest considering that people are allowed to travel now. So people have got comfortable with doing that and kind of put What happened in the past behind them, we get all that. And the economy, there's not much we can do and we're fully understanding of that. Essentially, what I'm looking for from from all you out there, and a lot of you have been absolutely amazing, there's people donating monthly Athley and I've continued to do so since the outset of this thing. The support has been absolutely phenomenal. And we do want to see this Go the full run and to be heard in a court of law and justice to be done. But we can't do that without donations. And the donations I've dried up pretty much right now. And, there is a link. If if you're able to donate, there's a link in my bio. I'll also if you're watching this on Rumble or YouTube, I'll put it in the description down below. I'll also include it in the Twitter, which is the best place to find me and the best place to get the most comprehensive information and updates that you can from us and news releases and that type of thing. So I'll put all of that, like I said, either in the description on Rumble and YouTube, or I'll put it in the body of the post. And if you are able to donate to our GiveSendGo, then you can go, to my bio in both Instagram on Twitter, and I believe also on the Facebook page as well. But, again, I'll put it all in the descriptions wherever relevant, wherever you might happen to be watching this right now. So I need I guess we'll we need you to give us your feedback. Do do we take this to the Supreme Court of Canada. Do you think it's worth our while? But the bottom line is at the end of the day, we need money and we need support to do this. So Let me know in the comments what you think. We've got to make a call, like I said, before January 8, because we need to prep our submissions and everything for the Supreme Court of Canada if we're gonna do this. If you feel that you're gonna be able to help them and help us push Push on with this, the original case and the new case, as as a sort of a secondary backup, if you like, then please let us know. We're not going to let it go. We're going to keep pushing on. So I'll leave it right there, but please leave a comment down below, leave us your thoughts as to whether you think we should take this to the Supreme Court of Canada or not, and, Merry Christmas to everybody and, season's greetings,
The Canadian Freedom Litigation Fund UPDATES - FEDERAL VACCINE TRAVEL MANDATES LAWSUIT - UNDERWAY AND PROCEEDING THROUGH THE FEDERAL COURT – STATUS: FEDERAL COURT OF APPEALThis podcast/interview... givesendgo.com
Log into Facebook Log into Facebook to start sharing and connecting with your friends, family, and people you know. facebook.com
Login • Instagram Welcome back to Instagram. Sign in to check out what your friends, family & interests have been capturing & sharing around the world. instagram.com

@ShaunRickard67 - Shaun Rickard

BREAKING: The Federal Court of Appeal has released its decision, dismissing our appeal to the declaration of mootness in our Federal Vaccine Travel Mandate lawsuit. We are regrouping right now, I will post the Judge's ruling as soon as I have a link to the entire PDF that I can…

@ShaunRickard67 - Shaun Rickard

Queen's Law Professor, @PardyBruce & @rupasubramanya summarize serious legislative violations perpetrated by the Trudeau Cabinet & Jennifer Little, head of the covert 'Covid Recovery Team', who scrambled & failed to find ANY scientific evidence to support their tyrannical vaccine… https://t.co/6y3p4P7GdN

Video Transcript AI Summary
The cross-examination reveals that the government panel responsible for creating the vaccine mandate for travel in Canada lacked expertise in medicine and infectious diseases. The director general of the panel, Jennifer Little, invoked cabinet confidence when asked about who ordered the mandates. The panel received no solid scientific recommendation from health and science experts to implement the mandate. Furthermore, an email exchange between Transport Canada and the Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC) showed a lack of specific scientific rationale for the mandate. Little admitted that implementing the mandate when only 50% of eligible Canadians were vaccinated would have caused chaos, but they waited until 80% were vaccinated. This raises questions about the true motivations behind the mandate.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Some some of the cross examination really reads like a John Grisham novel. You know, you've got the secretive government panel within Transport Canada, which is tasked with crafting the mandate. Apart from its head, who is a career bureaucrat, She has a degree in English literature. We don't really know much about the others. There are about 20 people on this panel. And she except She names 1 individual on this panel, and but who seems to have some kind of a public health background. When I reached out to her, she said she has a master's in science. But she refused to tell me what that was in. For all you know, it could be astrophysics, but we don't we don't we don't know we don't know that. But the key Key point here is none of these people had a background in medicine, epidemiology, infectious diseases, virology, you name it. They were just there to provide a cover for the mandate. Speaker 1: And you talk about is it Jennifer Little? Speaker 0: It's Jennifer Little. Yes. Speaker 1: And she was the one who was in charge of this. Is that correct? Speaker 0: Yeah. She was the director general of this this group, of Speaker 1: COVID nineteen. These are all civil servants you're talking about? They're all civil servants. K. Why did they regard it as part of their duty to Provide a cover story for the politicking of the Liberal government. I thought they had a duty to the public fundamentally. So why were they roped into this, and why did they agree to it? Speaker 0: Well, I mean, this is something that you, you know, you would have to ask them. But my guess is, you know, they were just doing their jobs, I guess. You know, you have the secretive task force within Transport Canada. And they really had no good scientific rationale. And they were looking for 1. They were scrambling for 1 days before literally less than 10 days before the mandate goes into effect. And, and, you know, including hoping that the Public Health Agency of Canada, PHAC, would come up with something, which they didn't. And, and and Jennifer Little, the bureaucrat that I referred to with the bachelor's degree in English literature, repeatedly said the decisions were made at very high levels. And, these were people senior to her and invoked cabinet confidence, and refused to answer who exactly ordered the mandates. Speaker 1: This was during cross examination? Speaker 0: Yes. This was during cross examination. Speaker 1: And she has the right she has the right to keep that information secret if it's come from from what? From a high enough legislative source? Speaker 0: I I I would guess so. I mean, this is not my area of expertise. I don't really know the law governing civil servants. But she certainly repeatedly, invoked cabinet confidence when she was asked questions of on who exactly ordered the mandates, making it pretty clear, I I I guess, I mean, one could infer from this, the decision was taken either by the prime minister himself or the cabinet as a whole. Speaker 2: Just just put aside the charter Sure. Just just on the basis of pure authority and the way government works, we have separation of powers. Yes? Governments and legislators. Now I know to most people, Those 2 things will look like the same thing because the same people are heading both of these branches. You know, the the prime minister sits in the House commons and the cabinet does as well, and they seem to run the show in the legislature, but they're 2 different things. And the legislature must pass a statute It gives the authority to the executive branch, which is what the cabinet heads, to make certain rules. Now those though though that authority is Limited according to its terms. And those terms in this case are, you can make rules about safety. But the problem is that if you don't have the prevention of infection as one of the characteristics of the vaccine, And the next question is, well okay. But but then what's the safety thing you're doing? Speaker 1: Well, Rupa and the plaintiffs And their representative lawyer have already made the claim that the evidence on the safety front not only wasn't there to begin with, but couldn't even be scrounged up post hoc. So that just seems absurd on the on the face of it. Speaker 2: Well, right. So so if I may, so, I mean, what Rupa's article was about and what and what The what the Santa Cruz examination managed to achieve was essentially an admission that There there wasn't really any, solid scientific recommendation from the from from the health and science people To the transport people that this ought to be done. Should should I I I I think I think the cross examination was very well done. And it might be interesting just To just to read you a very short sentence from, Jennifer Little that, Rippa was talking about in her cross examination. Right? So The question was, are there any emails, any briefs, any reports from Health Canada or public health recommending the implementation of a mandatory vaccination policy for travel. And after a long pause, The answer was this. I do not recall a document from the public health agency Or Health Canada to Transport Canada recommending that Transport Canada take this approach. In other words, there was there was no solid written recommendation to do this. And Right. Speaker 1: Well, that's that that sounds clear enough so that it's not even a matter of opinion. Right? Because we can always bandy about Rupa, you have a comment. Speaker 0: Yeah. Just to quickly jump in here, Jordan. Just picking up from what Bruce was saying that, you know, the damning e mail exchange that I mentioned in my story, it's about a senior Transport Transport Canada official who is emailing his counterpart at PHAC and asking this individual, look, The mandate's gonna be going into going into effect in a few days. We need we need some scientific rationale, some scientific evidence as soon as possible. He doesn't hear from this individual for a few days. Now it's like literally where the clock is ticking and he presses her and he says, we need something fairly quick. So Please, could you get something to us soon? And she eventually responds to him. And it's just generic homilies about how Vaccines are good for you. You should get vaccinated. And we believe that vaccines prevent severe disease and so on and so forth. The question is, What does this have to do with the transportation sector? How is it preventing transmission? How is it doing how is it specific to the travel sector. That's the question. And I will also tell you one more thing that I couldn't get into my story. Again, this goes back to Jennifer Little. She's asked about the, the implementation of the mandate. And she says, look, you know, had we done had Had we implemented this mandate when 50% of eligible Canadians have been vaccinated, it would have created, to use her own words, chaos in the system. If this were really about public policy, public health policy, shouldn't vaccination have been that should have been the primary consideration. But what they do is they wait till 80% of Canadians have been vaccinated, where a high number of high percentage of Canadians are vaccinated to implement a vaccine mandate, which is just extraordinary. Speaker 2: So And I agree. Just to finish off this thought, to to to to go back to this this This idea that the rationale let's let's just give them the benefit of the doubt. Let's say that the actual health based Scientific rationale is, as Rupa alludes to, that, you know, vaccines are are generally a good thing and that that having a vaccine mandate Will incentivize people to get a vaccine when they wouldn't otherwise do so. That is, it's not about Being on the plane, it's about the fact that people who want to be on a plane will have to get back. K? Here's the problem. If that's the rationale, That is not about the safety of air travel. And that means that is not an order authorized under the

@ShaunRickard67 - Shaun Rickard

JENNIFER LITTLE - Career Bureaucrat - Headed up the secretive & covert 20-person 'Covid Recovery Team' at Transport Canada - None of whom, including Little had any scientific or epidemiological backgrounds. Read the full official Federal Court transcripts from Jennifer Little's…

@ShaunRickard67 - Shaun Rickard

One of several smoking guns found during cross examinations of Senior Government Health Officials during our Lawsuit, irrefutable proof that the Trudeau Government lied. Dr. Lourenco - Director General, Health Canada - Personally approved the use of ALL C-19 vaccines in Canada.…

@ShaunRickard67 - Shaun Rickard

WE JUST FILED A SECOND LAWSUIT AGAINST THE GOVERNMENT - Vaccine Travel Mandates In our new lawsuit, which we filed with the Federal Court today, we are now suing the Government for damages - Link to our Statement of Claim below. We have taken this unexpected path as it appears…

@ShaunRickard67 - Shaun Rickard

Open letter to Jennifer Little, Head of the Covid Recovery Team (Official title at the time of the Vaccine Travel Mandates) and Dr. Celia Lourenco, Director General, Health Canada (Official title at the time of the Vaccine Travel Mandates). We would like to extend an…

@ShaunRickard67 - Shaun Rickard

*Share this post widely. Open letter to, @PierrePoilievre, @LeslynLewis, @MelissaLantsman, @Roman_Baber, @RachaelThomasMP and et al @CPC_HQ - A public response is respectfully requested. My co-applicant, Karl Harrison & myself, Brian Peckford, Maxime Bernier, Nabil Ben Naoum…

drsimonegold
Posted - December 26, 2023 at 8:37 PM
Saved - December 26, 2023 at 9:12 PM

@drsimonegold - Dr. Simone Gold

“No one should be made to choose between his or her livelihood and a potentially deadly DNA-altering and experimental injection.” Twenty-four former NYC workers who were fired for refusing the COVID jab are demanding their jobs back. Our fight continues. https://t.co/GLDPEv3Plz

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker expresses frustration about not being able to return to work despite the vaccine mandate being lifted. They explain that fired workers can reapply for their previous positions but must sign away their rights and may still be denied their jobs. The speaker highlights their dedication as a teacher, working through the pandemic while pregnant and prioritizing their students. They mention being fired without due process for declining the vaccine. They also raise concerns about the hidden data on vaccine side effects, such as blood clots, strokes, reproductive issues, and excessive mortality. The speaker concludes by stating that no one should have to choose between their livelihood and a potentially dangerous vaccine, and calls for an apology for all employees affected by the mandate.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Even though the vaccine mandate has been lifted, I have still not been able to return to work because the city has determined the fired workers will not be reinstated, but may reapply for their previous positions at which time they will sign away their rights to challenge their employment status and potentially be denied their jobs again, this time with no recourse. Should they be rehired, they would start from the bottom at the lowest salary step and without tenure. That is not happening, not after I gave my life to that job for a decade. I was an exemplary teacher calling an employee. I received timely effective observations, led professional development conferences, set the bar for parent outreach in student engagement and barely ever took a day off. At the end of my career, I worked pregnant through the pandemic because I knew my students, especially with my special education population needed in person learning. My students were always as much a priority to me as my own family, often to the detriment of my family since the job required ample personal time and attention outside of school hours. This might sound like an overabundance Self critics, but I will not be silent about the dedication I put into a career that was so quick to throw me aside. I was the kind of teacher whom you would want your son or daughter to have, And I was fired without a formal charge, without the due process that is my lawful right because I declined an objection that we have since learned and wreaked havoc on the lives of so many. I will forever stand on my decision to maintain my dignity, my health, my bodily autonomy, and my freedom from unnecessary medical interventions, especially since the data that Pfizer and other manufacturers wanted to hide for 75 years Has not been kind to them. Blood clots and strokes, reproductive issues, heart attacks in both the old and young, unprecedented miscarriages and aggressive cancers, Excessive all cause mortality in the youngest age bracket to date. People are suffering from these shots. And while that is an entirely different conversation and one that will come to light sooner And one that will come to light soon later, the takeaway from today's is this. No one should be getting to choose between his or her livelihood a potentially deadly DNA alter than experimental injection, all city employees who were fired or forced to resign due to the vaccine mandate deserve an apology. Never stop demanding to be made whole
PoliceOnGuard
Posted - March 28, 2024 at 1:52 PM
Saved - March 28, 2024 at 10:30 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Leah McInnes, a nurse in Saskatchewan, has been cleared of spreading misinformation by the College of Registered Nurses of Saskatchewan. The investigation found the accusations to be unfounded. McInnes supported vaccines but opposed mandates, citing autonomy and informed consent. The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms called it a victory for free expression. The Saskatchewan government initially acknowledged concerns about autonomy but changed their stance under pressure. The influence of unions and health regulators in promoting political ideologies over medical knowledge is concerning. Public disclosure of political influences is needed for a neutral medical profession.

@PoliceOnGuard - PoliceOnGuardForThee

Leah McInnes, a Registered Nurse in Saskatchewan, has been cleared of all wrongdoing after being accused of spreading misinformation by the College of Registered Nurses of Saskatchewan (CRNS). McInnes expressed concerns about covid vaccine effectiveness and shared views opposing vaccine mandates which prompted ‘anti-vaxxer’ complaints from fellow staff to the investigative branch of the CRNS. The investigation brought charges of spreading misinformation; accusations later determined to be unfounded, ending with all charges being dismissed. In their release, the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms (JCCF) described McInnes’s advocacy as measured and balanced; “She had supported vaccines as an important tool in Covid-management efforts while also pointing to emerging scientific evidence…that Covid vaccines did not eliminate transmission. [she] opposed vaccine mandates as a violation of basic ethical principles of autonomy and informed… consent” John Carpay, President of the JCCF went on to share, “This is a significant victory for free expression and democratic participation…all Canadians who work in a regulated profession have the freedom to advocate for their beliefs and should not face threats from their own professional association or professional regulator”. The Saskatchewan government initially acknowledged the potential infringements to individual autonomy associated with vaccine mandates but quickly changed their tune under the influence of the Saskatchewan Union of Nurses, NDP leader Ryan Meili and a group of Saskatchewan Health Authority’s Medical Health Officers, all calling for the “mandatory immunization” of all healthcare workers . While the NDP influence is not surprising, the bullying from health regulators is concerning, showing their willingness to abuse their influence to further political ideologies above sound medical knowledge and advancing research. It is time to demand the complete public disclosure of all political influences within these unions and agencies. The medical profession must remain neutral, supporting the health and wellbeing of citizens without political entanglements.   To read the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms article, click here; https://www.jccf.ca/free-speech-victory-charges-against-nurse-who-opposed-vaccine-mandates-defeated/

Free speech victory: Charges against nurse who opposed vaccine mandates defeated | Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms REGINA, SK: The Justice Centre is pleased to announce that the College of Registered Nurses of Saskatchewan (CRNS) has ruled in favour of nurse Leah McInnes following an October and November 2023 disciplinary hearing. The Investigation Committee of the CRNS had charged Ms. McInnes with spreading “misinformation” because she had voiced her concerns about vaccine mandates. The outcome vindicates her right to professionally advocate ... Read More jccf.ca
WallStreetSilv
Posted - April 5, 2024 at 4:29 AM
Saved - April 5, 2024 at 4:11 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A Canadian medical worker is facing job rejections due to her COVID vaccination status. Employers are asking about the number of shots she has received, which she finds intrusive and unnecessary. She urges for an end to this practice, stating that it is not their business, particularly in employment.

@WallStreetSilv - Wall Street Silver

This medical worker in Canada is being DENIED work because of her COVID vaccination status. She is applying for jobs, and one of the questions the employer is asking is: How many COVID shots have you had? "I've been declined work over my vaccination status" "I came to a question stating 'do you have 1,2,3,4 or 5 COVID vaccines" "ENOUGH is enough of this" "Stop asking people for their medical history" "It's none of your goddamn business" "Especially for employment" "This needs to STOP" 🚨🚨🚨

Video Transcript AI Summary
I was asked how many COVID vaccines I have, with no option to skip. I put 5 to waste their time like they waste mine. Employers shouldn't ask for medical history for jobs. I called EI about being declined work due to vaccination status. Employers requesting this should stop. Translation: I was asked how many COVID vaccines I have, with no option to skip. I put 5 to waste their time like they waste mine. Employers shouldn't ask for medical history for jobs. I called EI about being declined work due to vaccination status. Employers requesting this should stop.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And then I came to a question stating, do you have 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5 COVID vaccines. There was no option for 0. There was no way to skip this question. It's hilarious. So you know what? I put I I put 5. I put 5. I put 5. If these employers wanna waste my time, I'll waste yours. Give me a callback, please. You wanna waste my time? I'm gonna waste your time. Enough is enough of this. Stop asking people for their their medical history. It's none of your goddamn business, especially for employment. Like, this needs to stop. It's crazy. I've even called EI and let them know because I've been declined work over my vaccination status still. Like, are we gonna get over this? Wake up. To the ones to the employers that are requesting this, stop.
denisrancourt
Posted - May 1, 2024 at 9:18 PM
Saved - May 1, 2024 at 9:42 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Scientist @josephmhickey achieved a legal victory in Canada regarding vaccine-mandate firings. He self-represented and secured the right to appeal on constitutional grounds, bringing potential government accountability for vaccine mandates.

@denisrancourt - Denis Rancourt

BREAKING: Stunning legal victory about vaccine-mandate firings in Canada Scientist @josephmhickey was self-represented and won an uphill battle against the Government legal team securing his right to appeal on constitutional grounds 👉One step closer to possible government accountability for being vicious tyrants in forcing injections on workers

@josephmhickey - Joseph Hickey

LEAVE TO APPEAL GRANTED 1/ I have obtained leave to appeal in my Vaccine Mandates Employment Insurance (EI) case at the @SSTribunal_EN.

realXinOoi
Posted - May 15, 2024 at 12:24 PM
Saved - May 16, 2024 at 2:33 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I recently won a Court case related to employer COVID vaccine mandates. The Court found that the department acted unreasonably in applying the policy to me and placing me on leave without pay. I thank the Court for delivering justice and acknowledge my right to pursue medical information before consenting to a medical procedure. I self-represented in this case, and the Court's oral Decision is not available on the NSW Case Law website.

@realXinOoi - Xin Yin Ooi

VACCINE MANDATE COURT WIN 1. I recently won a Court case (in NSW) related to employer COVID vaccine mandates. Please find a redacted version of the Court’s oral Decision here. https://app.box.com/s/w3jiyqveujw2ps09fo1f9tlpny152n9k 2. I feel a deep sense of duty to make this public, as it may be useful for others who are pursuing similar cases. 3. I thank the Court for delivering justice over this grievance which has troubled me for a long time, and for acknowledging my right to pursue medical information before consenting to a medical procedure. 4. More importantly, I thank GOD. He has been on my side from the beginning. 5. I self-represented in this case, which took more than a year to finalise. 6. The Court has advised that “There is no written Judgment available unfortunately as the Judicial Officer only delivers oral Judgment for the small claim hearing matters.” - so this Decision will not be available on the NSW Case Law website.

Court Transcript - 10 April 2024 - Ooi v DPE Decision - Private Conversations unrelated to Decision or Judgement Redacted.pdf | Powered by Box app.box.com

@realXinOoi - Xin Yin Ooi

7. “The first conclusion relates to the reasonableness of the department’s vaccination direction. Whilst there is quite rightly no challenge by Ms Ooi to the lawfulness of the COVID vaccination policy, the Court finds that the department acted unreasonably in its application of the policy to her.” 8. “It was unreasonable to direct Ms Ooi to get vaccinated or obtain an exemption and return to the office at that time as she had a valid working from home agreement in place, she was actively investigating Novavax…” 9. “The second conclusion relates to the department’s actions of placing Ms Ooi on leave without pay… There is no lawful basis to place an employee on leave without pay…The actions taken by the department to direct Ms Ooi to cease work and place her on leave without pay amounted to a suspension under s 70 of the GSE Act.” 10. I have redacted some conversations unrelated to the Court’s Decision, out of respect for my Defendant.

@realXinOoi - Xin Yin Ooi

page 1-4 of Court's oral decision, for those who prefers to use jpeg. https://t.co/M2Zi6od98O

@realXinOoi - Xin Yin Ooi

page 5-8 of Court's oral decision, for those who prefers to use jpeg. https://t.co/TCFQ2NXAiS

@realXinOoi - Xin Yin Ooi

page 9 of Court's oral decision, for those who prefers to use jpeg. https://t.co/fjNc9rYfCk

JohnBasham
Posted - June 8, 2024 at 1:12 AM
Saved - June 9, 2024 at 6:27 AM

@JohnBasham - John Basham

BREAKING: Ninth Circuit Court Of Appeals Has Ruled That The Covid-19 Shot WAS NOT A VACCINE, ONLY A MEDICAL TREATMENT, THAT EMPLOYERS COULD NOT MANDATE! https://t.co/kJlhw7W4ng

toobaffled
Posted - June 27, 2024 at 4:59 AM
Saved - June 27, 2024 at 1:30 PM

@toobaffled - “Sudden And Unexpected”

Are you vaccinated? It’s time to sue your doctor .. 🧑‍⚕️ share this everywhere You can also sue your pharmacy 👇 ☠️💉 https://t.co/nqfrXuDmbQ

Video Transcript AI Summary
On January 11, 2023, a notice was sent to medical professionals regarding the lack of indemnity for COVID-19 vaccine administration. It emphasized the importance of obtaining informed consent and warned against misinformation. The suggestion was made to record conversations with doctors about informed consent and potentially sue if necessary. The goal was to hold doctors accountable and raise awareness about the risks associated with vaccination.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This was put forward on January 11, 2023. And let's look at this. This was to doctors, physicians, nurses. This is what they say. So imagine you're a doctor, you've been given this vaccine out, and you get this. Dear medical professional, administering of COVID 19 vaccination is likely not an indemnified action. This is notice of your obligations risks, rights, and potential risks. It goes on to say, on, the second, July 2021 and 28 August 2021, the former federal government announced a proposed medical indemnity scheme for health professionals administering COVID 19 vaccines. Recent correspondence from government advisers outlines that such an indemnity scheme was never established per se, unlike the case with cove unlike the case with manufacturers of COVID 19 vaccines, there appears to be no government liability protection beyond the vaccine injury COVID 19 vaccine claims scheme. Now we're gonna keep breaking this apart and then we'll talk about it. This is important. So they they start going at a couple other angles here. This is all in one document. Government and AHPRA correspondents outline practitioners obligations to obtain informed consent. They're saying, hey, by the way, you need to you need to get informed consent and this is what that look like. Consent to be legally valid, it must be given voluntarily in the absence of undue pressure, coercion, or manipulation. It can only be given after the potential risks and benefits of the relevant vaccine. The risk of not having it at any alternative options have been explained to the person. Not a lot of that going on. Wow. But then it says then it says this, hey, remember remember that inform consent we told you you had to give people? Oh, by the way, you're also being threatened by your boards for misinformation. So you better walk that tight rope. It says, the 9 March 2021 joint statement by AHPRA and national boards threaten regulatory action, quote, for anti vaccine messages and professional health practices in any promotion of anti vaccination claims including on social media. Regardless, evidence from reputable sources demonstrates that COVID 19 provisionally approved vaccines have real known and unknown harms and immunocompromising effects. Doctors have a duty to warn patients of any material risk associated with the treatment as well as ensuring their decisions are being made without undue coercion. Speaker 1: The only way we're going to see any progress is if you go to your doctor and ask them, hey. Did you provide me with informed consent? And if you know they didn't ask, why didn't you provide me with informed consent? And then you say to them, hey, I think I may have to sue you for this. Record this conversation with your phone in your pocket, and just see what they say. If it's a good saucy video, get it around the world, and then go and sue your doctor. We need to get everybody on the same page. If we sue all doctors, it will be viral. It will be in the news, and they have to come out and explain what's happening. They did not provide you with informed consent. If you were vaccinated, you're damaged, and you're scared, then you absolutely need to do this. This is your only course of action to get anything back from what happened to you.
robbystarbuck
Posted - July 1, 2024 at 4:45 PM
Saved - July 1, 2024 at 5:06 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Blue Cross BlueShield of Tennessee has been ordered by a Federal Jury to pay $700,000 to Tanja Benton, an employee who was fired for refusing the COVID vaccine. Benton, a bio statistical research scientist, worked at BCBS for over 17 years. #JusticeServed

@robbystarbuck - Robby Starbuck

Incredible. A Federal Jury has determined that Blue Cross BlueShield of Tennessee must pay $700,000 to an employee that was fired for refusing the COVID vaccine. Tanja Benton was a bio statistical research scientist at BCBS for 17+ yrs before they fired her for refusing the vax. She’s my hero today. Below is the Judgement order ⬇️

dockaurG
Posted - July 9, 2024 at 3:57 AM
Saved - July 9, 2024 at 3:06 PM

@dockaurG - Kulvinder Kaur MD

👏🏽Bravo! US Court of Appeals leading us back to sanity. Govts are never sole arbiter of “truth” nor can there be blind deference to harmful & unethical/immoral edicts of govt esp against one’s conscience When will 🇨🇦courts show this courage for judicial independence/integrity?

@LeadingReport - Leading Report

BREAKING: U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit has reversed the dismissal of a case from physicians who were seeking to sue various credentialing boards who “suppressed” them for going against the official government story line about COVID-19.

robinmonotti
Posted - September 12, 2024 at 3:15 PM
Saved - September 13, 2024 at 8:33 AM

@robinmonotti - Robin Monotti

One of the few honest GPs in the UK. Hero.

@robinmonotti - Robin Monotti

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13842047/Covid-Vaccine-sceptic-GP-struck-misinformation.html

Vaccine sceptic GP who spread misinformation about Covid is struck off Dr Sam White claimed that the virus was planned and orchestrated by pharmaceutical companies along with tech tycoons Bill Gates and Elon Musk and called the Covid jabs a 'heinous crime'. dailymail.co.uk
DavidWolfe
Posted - November 13, 2024 at 10:17 PM
Saved - November 14, 2024 at 9:45 PM

@DavidWolfe - David Wolfe

Dr Paul Thomas was de-licensed for telling the Truth about vaccines—he let his patients choose the childhood vaccine schedules that parents wanted. This is what he found. https://t.co/iWTTyHBNHZ

Video Transcript AI Summary
We analyzed every patient in my practice without excluding anyone. We categorized over 500 unvaccinated children and more than 3,700 vaccinated ones. The findings were surprising: unvaccinated children experienced fewer illnesses and chronic conditions. The data clearly showed that as vaccination rates increased, so did health issues like infections, ADD, ADHD, neurodevelopmental problems, eczema, allergies, and anemia. The contrast between vaccinated and unvaccinated children was striking. If I had known this information before my daughter was born, I would have made different choices. Every parent wants the best for their child and deserves access to all relevant information to make informed decisions. I share this in hopes that it helps others.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We were definitely looking at every single patient born in my practice. There was no cherry picking. There was no we're gonna exclude you for this or that. Every baby born was looked at, and we looked at every single office visit. We stratified them according to the number of vaccines they had. Okay. So, basically, we had over 500 who had 0 vaccines, and then we had another 3,700 and some who had some vaccines. And what we found, Dell, was actually even mind boggling for myself. What I was clearly seeing was these kids don't get sick. They don't get chronic conditions. Well, the data spoke for itself, and you're showing your viewers the graph. Those orange lines are, over time, over that ten and a half years, the more vaccines you had, the worse you were for whether we looked at infections, ADD, ADHD, neurodevelopmental issues, eczema, allergies. It doesn't matter what we looked at. Even just plain old anemia skyrockets in the vaccinated when compared to the blue line, the unvaccinated. Wow. This data is so powerful. Speaker 1: If I had access to this information before my daughter was born, I would have made very different choices. Every parent wants the best for their child. Every parent deserves access to all the information to make an informed choice. I share this because I wish someone would share it with me.
ChildrensHD
Posted - November 21, 2024 at 7:31 PM
Saved - November 22, 2024 at 8:01 PM

@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense

“Stand firm. You will be compensated.” Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan was recently ordered to pay $10 million in punitive damages alone to a long-time (remote!) employee they fired because she declined to accept a COVID jab.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Employers are legally required to make reasonable accommodations, as affirmed by the Supreme Court in 2023, unless it poses a substantial cost. In this case, a remote worker with sincere religious beliefs was denied accommodation after submitting a letter from her priest, stating her objection to products linked to aborted fetal cell lines. The jury awarded $10 million in punitive damages against Blue Cross Blue Shield for their refusal to accommodate her. This case, along with others, sends a clear message to employers about the consequences of religious discrimination. The lawyers noted that a reasonable settlement was offered but rejected by the employer, leading to the trial and victory for the employee. It's a reminder that standing firm in the face of discrimination can lead to compensation.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Employers have an obligation under the law to make reasonable accommodations. And the Supreme Court in 2023 said that the employer has to do it unless it's a substantial cost. This is one of these cases where the employer did zip to try to accommodate this woman. She's a completely remote worker during COVID. She has sincere religious beliefs. She sends in a letter from her priest. She's Catholic. She doesn't want any product that involves the use of aborted fetal cell lines. And they just rejected it out of hand. No explanation. The jury awarded punitive damages. They awarded $10,000,000 to punish Blue Cross Blue Shield, a medical insurance company. And all of these cases, the Bart case of the metro operators, the the train operators, where they each got a $1,000,000, these are sending a signal to employers. Don't you ever do this again. Don't you ever think that you can just fire people who've been your loyal employees for 30 years because they have religious objections to an experimental shot. You can't discriminate against people based on their religion. I spoke to the lawyers in this case. They said that, you know, they they were happy to make a reasonable settlement. And, the the employer just wouldn't consider it. So that's why it went to trial and that's why she won. Speaker 1: Right back in the day, you told everyone to stand firm. They will be compensated if they fight back. You I remember you saying that and you were right. Look at this Speaker 0: It's happening. Again, it's happening, Polly.
robinmonotti
Posted - December 17, 2024 at 2:55 PM
Saved - December 17, 2024 at 4:27 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I recently learned that Dr. William Bay, who called Covid vaccines 'the crime of the century,' has had his medical license reinstated after a two-year suspension. The Queensland Supreme Court ruled in his favor, criticizing the conduct of the medical regulators as 'profoundly unsatisfactory.' Dr. Bay, who represented himself against a strong legal team, plans to continue speaking out about vaccine-related issues and claims that regulators are trying to silence health practitioners regarding the risks of Covid vaccines.

@robinmonotti - Robin Monotti

Doctor who labelled Covid vaccines 'crime of the century' scores huge legal win after he was banned from practising | "A doctor who labelled Covid vaccines 'the crime of the century' has forced medical authorities to hand back his licence after a two-year suspension.  Queensland's Supreme Court sided with Dr William Bay last Friday, who self-represented against a top legal team employed by the Queensland Medical Board and Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency (AHPRA). In his ruling, Justice Thomas Bradley described the conduct of the two medical regulators as 'profoundly unsatisfactory' and their accusations against Dr Bay as 'entirely unfounded'. Dr Bay has been unable to practise after his licence was suspended in August 2022.  On his X account, Dr Bay said that having won his case, where he was awarded costs and had all ongoing investigations dismissed, he would keep speaking out.   'We will not forget the vaccine-injured and the crime of the century is now exposed,' he tweeted.  In a Sunday interview with Sky News show The Outsiders, Dr Bay showed no sign of damping down his rhetoric, which saw him form activist group the Queensland People's Protest while practicing as a GP during the pandemic.  He accused regulators of issuing 'a gag order to all nurses, doctors, psychologists and every other health practitioner in Australia to shut up and be quiet about the risks of the so-called Covid vaccines'." David Southwell

@robinmonotti - Robin Monotti

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14200005/William-Bay-Covid-vaccine-ban-win.html

Major update on Aussie doctor who spoke out against Covid vaccines The Supreme Court sided with Dr William Bay, who self-represented against a top legal team employed by the Queensland Medical Board. dailymail.co.uk
thehealthb0t
Posted - January 4, 2025 at 5:03 AM
Saved - January 4, 2025 at 3:30 PM

@thehealthb0t - healthbot

How to refuse a vaccine https://t.co/L4GvFmMHST

Video Transcript AI Summary
Are you being pressured by your school or employer to get a COVID-19 vaccination? No one has the authority to force you to take experimental treatments. COVID-19 injections are not fully approved vaccines, and there are serious concerns about their safety and effectiveness. To protect yourself, you can access powerful documents from Solari that hold institutions accountable for any adverse reactions. These documents require institutions to acknowledge the risks and take personal liability for any harm caused. Simply fill out the forms with your information, send them via certified mail, and keep copies for your records. This process helps ensure your health decisions remain under your control.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Are you a student and your school or college is telling you that you must have a vaccination? Are you an employee and your employer is telling you that you must have a vaccination? No one, not even the government, has the authority to force or coerce vaccinations. Many companies and institutions have become zealots in promoting COVID 19 injections due to corruption, self interest, or ignorance about the injuries and deaths from adverse reactions to the experimental injections. Mass censorship and false information about the effectiveness of those injections has created serious misunderstandings about these unapproved experimental and hazardous medical treatments. The fact is, COVID-nineteen injections are not even vaccines by definition. And while each manufacturer has different issues with their injections, none of them have been shown to be safe or effective and none of them have been approved by the FDA for non emergency use. On a daily basis there is mounting evidence of very strange injuries, deaths, and adverse reactions from the experimental COVID-nineteen injections. You should never allow any institution, doctor, or friend to pressure you into taking experimental or unproven medications. I'm gonna show you how to take control of that and protect yourself and your family. Solari has some very powerful documents online for you to copy, edit, and present to any school, college, or employer where you are being pressured to take the experimental COVID 19 injections, which they are calling vaccines. These documents make it impossible for any institutional officer to claim ignorance of COVID 19 injection risks. They require that the institution's officers take full personal liability for any injuries, deaths and losses caused by the experimental treatment. They require that they acknowledge the possible adverse reactions and negative consequences of the treatment. They require that the institution's officers acknowledge the specific laws and codes that prohibit coerced experimental medical treatments. Those laws and codes are included in those documents, and the documents are free. Catherine Austin Fitts, who publishes the Solari report and website, has put together these very powerful documents in the spirit of public service because there are so many people and institutions now which are violating the law and our rights by trying to control the medicines and treatments we take. These are documents which you present to anyone who is trying to coerce you into taking medical treatments. Here's how to navigate to these forms. Go to pandemic. Solari.com. In the blue navigation bar, hover over employer and school forms. Select either the employer or the school form link. Even if you believe that you should take the COVID 19 injections, you need to present these forms to protect you in the case of any adverse reaction or negative consequences. These forms represent your requirement that they understand they cannot force vaccinations, they must inform you of the risks, and they must take full responsibility for any damages they cause. Simply put your name and address on the form printed out and present it to your school, college, or employer. It is best to send them by certified mail so you have proof of delivery. The forms require response by your school or employer. If they don't respond, your mail receipts are proof that they were noticed. Once any institutional officer receives this document, it is hard to imagine they would dare to coerce medical treatment upon you. The document informs them of the possible consequences they face if they attempt to coerce medical treatment on you. Remember, these are templates, so you remove any instructions and format it like a letter. Add your name and address and the name and address of the recipient whoever's coercing the COVID 19 injections and then add the date, a salutation, and sign it at the bottom, then send it by US certified mail. Keep copies and mail receipts as record of the delivery. If you deliver by hand, you won't have proof of delivery. You do want that proof because this document may change the legal status of you and the recipient to give you the advantage in the relationship. Without proof of delivery, they can claim they never saw it. Your health and health care should never be controlled by anyone but you. These documents are how you get that control.
liz_churchill10
Posted - January 29, 2025 at 1:33 AM
Saved - January 29, 2025 at 3:57 AM

@liz_churchill10 - Liz Churchill

She was right. https://t.co/fV6hzrknbn

thehealthb0t
Posted - October 26, 2025 at 3:16 AM
Saved - October 26, 2025 at 11:02 AM

@thehealthb0t - healthbot

How to refuse a vaccination. https://t.co/I7H3RILo1U

DrAseemMalhotra
Posted - March 12, 2026 at 5:03 PM
Saved - March 12, 2026 at 7:54 PM

@DrAseemMalhotra - Dr Aseem Malhotra

BREAKING NEWS TELEGRAPH: ‘I blew the whistle on covid jabs 5 years ago. Now, I’m fighting for my medical license’ ‘You do not rebuild trust by shutting down debate. You rebuild it through transparency, humility and the courage to admit uncertainty’ https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2026/03/12/fighting-for-medical-licence-after-blowing-covid-whistle/ https://t.co/j9BvGyeSjC

View Full Interactive Feed