reSee.it - Related Post Feed

redvoicenews
Posted - February 4, 2023 at 12:34 PM
Saved - January 12, 2025 at 10:31 PM

@redvoicenews - RVM News

Trump Calls Attention To All The Chinese Espionage In America, Much Bigger Than Just The Balloon "The FBI even recently admitted that China operates a secret police force on American soil." - Donald Trump https://t.co/dCLdjTxhnY

Video Transcript AI Summary
China has thousands of spies in the U.S. across various sectors, including business and academia. I initiated a program at the Department of Justice to combat Chinese espionage, which Joe Biden quickly ended, labeling it as racist. This decision followed pressure from faculty at the University of Pennsylvania, linked to the Biden Center. Congress should investigate the university's financial ties to China and the Biden family. As president, I took significant steps against Chinese espionage, and I plan to expand these efforts upon returning to office. The FBI has acknowledged China's secret police operating in the U.S., enforcing Communist Party control over Chinese nationals here. We will dismantle this influence decisively and implement measures to protect American secrets.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's rarely even mentioned that China has many thousands of spies working in the United States in business, finance, academia, technology, media, and likely even government, very sadly. As president, I established a special initiative at the Department of Justice tasked with the sole mission of targeting Chinese espionage in the United States. Joe Biden terminated that program right away, suggesting that it was somehow racist. According to published reports, this came shortly after 160 faculty members of the University of Pennsylvania, where I went to school, the Wharton School of Finance, home of the now infamous Biden Center, wrote to Merrick Garland and demanded that the Chinese espionage initiative be shut down immediately. Congress needs to dig deep into the financial operations of the University of Pennsylvania, its Chinese donors, the Biden Center, and the Biden family and figure out what the hell is going on. As president, I took the most dramatic action of any administration to curtail China's ability to conduct espionage in the United States. And when I'm back in the White House, those efforts will be expanded in a very, very big way. Instead of hunting down Republicans, a reformed FBI and Justice Department will be hunting down Chinese spies. We will create new partnerships with businesses and universities to give them the tools to protect themselves from insider threats. We will also impose whatever visa sanctions and travel restrictions are necessary to shut off Chinese access to American secrets in compliance with our demands and in compliance with our laws. The FBI even recently admitted that China operates a secret police force on American soil. How do you like that one? Imposing the iron fist of the Communist Party. The rule think of this. The Communist Party rule on Chinese nationals and the United States. Just think about that. We will shut that down and we will shut it down cold. Thank you very much.
_KrisHunter_
Posted - September 16, 2023 at 1:30 PM
Saved - September 16, 2023 at 3:31 PM

@_KrisHunter_ - KrisHunter

This is the network that the FBI used to communicate with Twitter https://t.co/jk2hSU418r

@_KrisHunter_ - KrisHunter

Normally I would say it's weird that they're connected to China but not anymore. https://t.co/0A9OLBk0yP

bennyjohnson
Posted - November 1, 2023 at 5:01 PM
Saved - November 1, 2023 at 8:18 PM

@bennyjohnson - Benny Johnson

Sen. Rand Paul brilliantly makes FBI Director Wray accidentally ADMIT to STILL meeting with Big Tech companies after previously using them for election interference: "YOU PAID THEM 3 MILLION DOLLARS" https://t.co/iRn5pBaZ9v

Video Transcript AI Summary
The FBI has changed its interactions with social media companies following court rulings, but denies discussing constitutionally protected speech. The FBI also denies discussing vaccine efficacy with social media organizations. Director Wray is not familiar with a specific investigation involving subpoenas issued to congressional staffers. He acknowledges the need for caution when investigating a separate branch of government. The FBI denies paying Twitter for content moderation and is only required to reimburse companies for expenses related to producing information. Director Wray maintains that FBI agents have acted in compliance with the law. Secretary Mayorkas provides the same response as Director Wray regarding discussions of constitutionally protected speech.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Is the FBI still meeting with social media companies? Speaker 1: We're having some interaction with social media companies, but all of those interactions have changed fundamentally, in the wake of the court's rulings. Speaker 0: That's sort of an acknowledgement that perhaps you weren't just talking about national security, child pornography and human trafficking, right? You had other areas of discussion that did involve constitutionally protected speech. Speaker 1: No, no. That's not an acknowledgment of that. Speaker 0: But then how did you change your behavior? Speaker 1: Out of an abundance of caution in order to make sure that we don't run afoul of any court ruling. I would say, by the way, of course, that the injunction has been stayed by the supreme court. Speaker 0: Did any, anybody from the FBI ever discuss constitutionally protected speech with social media organizations? Speaker 1: Not to my understanding. Speaker 0: Vaccine efficacy, never discussed any post concerning vaccine efficacy? Speaker 1: Well, certainly not because to my understanding, as you know, the FBI was the 1st and for a long time, the only agency in the intelligence community to assess that the COVID origin was most likely from a lab lead. So the idea that we were engaging in I Speaker 0: commend you for that. But The Twitter files and other indications, as well as the Missouri versus Biden, list many cases of both DHS and FBI discussing constitutionally protected speech, Vaccine efficacy, mask efficacy, people who said, my brother got the vaccine and died yesterday. And the brother actually did die, but proof of cause and effect is one thing. But taking down posts like that was part of the discussion in these meetings. Speaker 1: Not by the FBI. We would not have been engaging with social media companies about vaccine efficacy, to my knowledge, certainly. Speaker 0: Director Wray, in 2017, the Department of Justice issued subpoenas to members of, The House Intelligence Committee congressional staffers as well as, senate, judiciary committee staffers, to turn over private information. Were you involved with that investigation, aware of it at the time? Speaker 1: I I'm not familiar with that specific investigation. Speaker 0: This had to do with the leaks, I believe. We have never been told completely. But the leaks concerning the, crossfire hurricane And the leaks concerning the conversation between Flynn and Kisli act that was wiretapped, that was classified that somehow got out, but you're not aware of anybody from the Congress being investigated? Speaker 1: Well, as I sit here right now, that's not something that's ringing a bell for me. Speaker 0: Do you see a problem With the Department of Justice issuing subpoenas to congressional staffers who are providing oversight to the very organization that's issuing the subpoenas? Speaker 1: Well, certainly, any time there's an investigative activity that touches upon a separate branch of government, namely the legislative branch, it has to be done extraordinarily carefully. And there are all kinds of policies that the department has in place to make sure that that's done appropriately. Speaker 0: Director, did the FBI pay Twitter Money to moderate content moderation? Speaker 1: I'm not aware of us paying money to moderate content there or anywhere else. Speaker 0: What was the $3,000,000 for that the FBI gave that's been revealed in Twitter files, which has been characterized by those writing the Twitter files as payment for content moderation. Basically, they said Twitter, you know, you guys will meet with them all the time. You had them taken down so many posts. They said, well, gosh, It's a lot of work, why don't you pay us? And so you did. You paid them $3,000,000. Are you aware of the payment? I'm not Speaker 1: aware of that specific payment, but I can tell you that when it comes to payments, going back well over 4 decades, when we are required by federal law when a company like in this instance a provider, goes through expenses to produce information, we're required to reimburse them for those expenses. And so I think that a lot of the questions about payments revolve around exactly that. Speaker 0: And you will repeat under oath that there was never any discussion of the FBI, to take down constitutionally protected speech. You think it's all national security, child pornography, sex trafficking? No discussion of constitutionally protected speech because this is all going to come out, and a lot of it's come out already in certain depositions. But you're saying there was never any discussion By any of your agents in any of these meetings of constitutionally protected speech being taken down. Speaker 1: To my knowledge, our agents conducted themselves in compliance with the law throughout. Speaker 0: Same question to secretary Mayorkas. You're, not aware of your agents Ever discussing any constitutionally protected speech with any of the social media companies? Speaker 1: The same answer as director Ray provided to you, ranking member Paul.
committeeonccp
Posted - November 9, 2023 at 1:12 PM
Saved - November 10, 2023 at 10:43 AM

@committeeonccp - Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party

“The issue we must confront is whether we want the dominant media platform in America to be one controlled by the Chinese Communist Party... If they can control what information you get, then they can have almost unlimited power.” - Chairman @RepGallagher https://t.co/1TQYISggXL

Video Transcript AI Summary
The issue at hand is who controls the algorithm of TikTok, which is owned by Chinese company ByteDance. Chinese companies, particularly technological champions, are influenced by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). The concern is whether we should allow the dominant media platform in America to be controlled by the CCP. TikTok is not only a platform for dance videos but also a source of news for young Americans. If the Chinese Communist Party can control the information people receive, they will have significant power. This is the concern we must address.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The fundamental problem is who controls the algorithm. TikTok is, of course, owned by ByteDance, a Chinese company that is beholden like most Chinese companies, but especially their technological champions to the CCP. We've had ByteDance executives apologize in the past for failing to follow appropriate political direction. So the issue we must confront and, admittedly, it's a complex, difficult issue. But the issue we must confront is whether we want to allow the dominant media platform in America to be one controlled by the Chinese Communist Party. Because TikTok is not just a source of dance videos increasingly for young Americans, millennials, Gen Z, below, it's how they get the news. And that's really the concern. If they can control what information you get, then they can have almost unlimited power. That's the concern we have. Do you
LexiAlex
Posted - November 23, 2023 at 2:06 AM
Saved - November 23, 2023 at 12:19 PM

@LexiAlex - الكسندرا ميراي

They are going to shut down tiktok for sure https://t.co/iCOIcATcnf

Video Transcript AI Summary
In 1903, the Uganda scheme was proposed to create a Jewish homeland in East Africa. Europe was becoming hostile for Jews, so the idea of partnering with Britain to establish a homeland in present-day Kenya seemed appealing. The plan was approved by the Zionist Congress, but it never materialized. White settlers in East Africa opposed the scheme, fearing displacement. They formed an anti-Zionist committee and caused Britain to withdraw their offer. This raises questions about how the world would be different if the Jewish homeland had been established elsewhere.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Did you know that Israel was almost in Africa? Kind of. This is one of history's craziest almost moments that you've probably never heard of. The plan was called the Uganda scheme, and it was presented to the World Zionist Congress in 1903 by Theodore Herzl, widely regarded as the father of political Zionism. The plan would have created a Jewish homeland in East Africa. You might be wondering, why East Africa? Well, like many places in the world at the time, it was under the colonial control of the British empire. European colonizers came into East Africa and did what colonizers do. Displaced, dehumanized, subjugate, murder, the list goes But thousands of miles away, Europe was becoming an increasingly hostile environment for Jews. In fact, in 1903, Jews in Eastern Europe faced a terrible and bloody massacre. Jews were desperate. So when Britain offered to partner with the Zionists to establish a Jewish homeland in present day Kenya, it was appealing. So the 6th Zionist Congress convenes in August of 1903, and Herzl calls on the 473 delegates to vote on this plan. And it passes easily even though some hated it and many saw side as a temporary solution. But this is where it gets interesting. In the end, the Uganda scheme never came to fruition. In large part, because the white settlers in East Africa believed that it would be state. Unfair to them to be displaced by settlers. They established an anti Zionist immigration committee and published their approval in a local newspaper, causing Britain to withdraw their offer to the Zionists. All of this makes me wonder what the world would look like today if the Jewish homeland was anywhere else swore if the Palestinian people
SystemUpdate_
Posted - November 29, 2023 at 4:55 PM
Saved - December 3, 2023 at 8:39 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Is TikTok an agent of the CCP? Despite fear mongering, the US govt controls TikTok's content moderation, banning criticism of Zelensky or bin Laden's "Letter to America." TikTok prioritizes profit over moderation, while the US security state wants control. Threats to ban them are about compliance.

@SystemUpdate_ - System Update

**Is TikTok actually an agent of the CCP?** Despite fear mongering claims from every US politician & media outlet, the US govt has a total stranglehold on TikTok’s “content moderation.” It’s why they’ve banned any criticism of Zelensky—or bin Laden’s "Letter to America"👇

Video Transcript AI Summary
Many people believe that TikTok is controlled by the Chinese Communist Party and that its content moderation decisions are meant to manipulate young Americans. However, investigations have shown that the CIA and FBI are actually influencing TikTok's censorship. The founders of TikTok, who are capitalists, want to maintain access to the lucrative US market and have agreed to let the US government dictate what content should be censored. This is part of the US government's broader effort to control communication channels and ensure that critical videos or topics are censored according to their interests. TikTok's compliance with political censorship is driven by profit rather than ideology.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'd be willing to bet a lot of money, but there are a lot of you who believe this. Who believe that TikTok is controlled by the Chinese Communist Party. That the censorship or content moderation decisions they make are designed to manipulate young American people, young Americans into hating their government, into fighting with one another. Just like we were told the Russians do. We're constantly told the Russians are trying to infiltrate Social media to turn us against each other to create division. That was for a long time the reason more social media censorship was needed to Prevent the scary Russians from dividing us. Now they've added China to it. Knowing that a lot of people aren't afraid of Russia, That the Russiagate hoax proved to be a fraud. They've now switched the fear mongering to China. And I know there are a lot of people Who opposed the war in Ukraine, the US role in the war in Ukraine. Who know Russiagate is a fraud. Who say, no, Russia is not rendering a China. That's who we really have to be afraid of. Now what happened was, I actually did a lot of investigation and research into this because I wrote about it here in December of 2022 when I was still at substack, reflecting new US control of TikTok censorship, our report criticizing Zelensky was deleted. What happened was we produced a segment on our show here That was very critical of president Zelensky of the Ukrainian government and the war effort of the United States in Ukraine. And it got Went pretty viral. A lot of people were spreading it around and watching it. And then suddenly very short quickly it got banned, taken down by TikTok. That sent us a note saying this video is a violation of our terms of service. And of course I thought to myself, okay, I kept hearing that China censors to propagandize Americans against our government. So why would they wanna delete my video critical of the US government? Would they want to protect the US government from my criticism of it? Why would they want to protect the US government's war effort in Ukraine by banning critiques of it? That doesn't make any sense, does it? Just like it didn't make sense that TikTok banned mention of the Bin Laden letter? And we went and investigated what actually was going on. And it turns out that what's really going on. I'm gonna show you the evidence and you can make your own decision. Is that the CIA and the FBI have taken the position they want TikTok banned. The people who own TikTok, who are the founders of TikTok, the main founder in particular, is someone who was born in Singapore. He went to the London School of Economics. He then went to Harvard Business School. He's a capitalist. He's trying to get wealthy. He's getting rich. He's the founder of TikTok. And the US is an incredibly lucrative market for TikTok that they don't wanna lose access to because it would cost them 1,000,000,000 of dollars in valuation in their company. They're now trying to compete with Amazon and have ecommerce on that site. It's a gold mine. And so they're desperate not to get banned from the United States. And so they've told the CIA and the FBI, look, we don't care about political censorship. We'll turn that over to you. We'll let you Tell us what you want censored. In order for us to stay in the United States. And that is what's been happening. The US security state has been gradually commandeering the ability to content moderate on TikTok. As a condition for allowing TikTok to remain in the United States. The United States government has worked very hard to make sure it controls all important means of communication. It obviously has the US media in the palm of its hands. US media reports what the CIA and the FBI tell it to and doesn't report what they tell it not to say. The big tech platforms Facebook and Google and Twitter before Elon Musk, as we know were subject The constant orders from the government about what to censor and they did it. And the reason they're so fixated on Elon Musk. And the reason they hate Rumble and other any other site that doesn't obey them is because they can't stand the notion that Americans can go on a platform and communicate ideas that they can't stop. And this is what the ban The threats to ban TikTok are about. Is about trying to have the American government be able to commandeer those censorship decisions. So that Critical videos of Zelenskyy and the war in Ukraine or topic videos about the Bin Laden letter get Censored because the US government wants it to and they can easily get Google and Facebook to censor it It's a little harder with TikTok And TikTok has had to agree more and more because they don't care about political censorship. They care about profit. These are capitalists. They don't care about giving the US government control over content moderation. They're happy to do it. If that's the condition they have to meet in order to keep access to the very lucrative US market.

@SystemUpdate_ - System Update

TikTok cares far more about profit than content moderation—And the US security state cares deeply that no corners of the internet exist outside their control. It's what these constant threats to ban them are really about: Do what we want, or you're gone. https://rumble.com/v3yfiop-system-update-show-188.html

Americans Fired Since Oct. 7—What They Really Said. Is TikTok Censoring for China or the US? | SYSTEM UPDATE #188 Become part of our Locals community: https://greenwald.locals.com/ Follow Glenn: Twitter: https://twitter.com/ggreenwald Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/glenn.11.greenwald/ Facebook: https://www. rumble.com
TheChiefNerd
Posted - November 30, 2023 at 5:36 PM
Saved - November 30, 2023 at 9:27 PM

@TheChiefNerd - Chief Nerd

🚨 Rep. Elise Stefanik: “Do you believe that this censorship is a form of election interference?” Michael Shellenberger: “Absolutely it is. There’s no question in my mind.” @RepStefanik @shellenberger https://t.co/Bw04OSG7Ti

Video Transcript AI Summary
The Aspen Institute held a workshop attended by major media and social media platforms to discourage coverage of the Hunter Biden laptop story. This was concerning as there was no evidence of the laptop's existence, yet efforts were made to influence media coverage. Content moderators on platforms like Twitter have significant power in determining what Americans can say and see. It is inappropriate for unelected bureaucrats or tech companies to collude in influencing speech and information. The government and big tech should not decide who can speak on social media platforms; it should be decided by the people. This censorship can be seen as a form of election interference, as seen in the CTI League case where individuals displayed strong partisan bias.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This was the weirdest thing. We discovered that Aspen Institute had created a workshop that it was attended by basically all of the major media, including as well as all the major social media platforms to basically pre bunk in advance the Hunter Biden laptop even though it had not been there was no evidence that, that it existed outside of the fact that the FBI knew that they had it because they got it in December 2019. So to have the aspen as to trying to persuade people not to cover the Hunter Biden laptop story in August September of 2020 was quite chilling and disturbing to see. Speaker 1: These content moderators at social media platforms like Twitter wield an enormous amount of power in terms of determining not only what Americans can say, But also what Americans can see. Do you believe, Mr. Taibbi and Mr. Schellenberg, that it's appropriate for unelected bureaucrats Or these tech companies to collude to influence what Americans can say or read? Speaker 0: Absolutely not. And I wanted to stress again that all this was happening secretively with the blessing of the Department of Homeland Security with them sending, things to, from this is from the EIP at Stanford to, you know, to to Twitter and Facebook saying, We repeat our recommendations that this account be suspended. We recommend labeling all instances of this article. We recommend that you flag as falseness all these demands being made secretly without any public review. My view is that we don't, the government doesn't decide who can speak in the town square. Why should the government be deciding who can speak on social media platforms? We The People should decide our own content as adults' legal content. It should not be decided by either government or big tech. Speaker 1: And Mr. Taibbi, Mr. Schellenberg, do you believe that this censorship is a form of election interference? Speaker 0: Absolutely, it is. There's no question in my mind. Mr. Taibbi? Speaker 2: Yes. I think it certainly can be. And then the latest story that we did on the CTI League, we saw the over partisanship of the people involved in this operation. That was actually the reason the whistleblower came forward. The people involved, just The one of the quote was, they assumed everyone who was smart thought the way they did. They talked about the potential election of Donald Trump being an end of the world event. They talked about the wackadoodles who actually watch Fox News. And even as somebody who doesn't vote for Republicans, it was shocking to me to see this. And I think this was a consistent theme of not just the CTI League, but most of the censorship organizations that we looked at, they all tend to drift in one direction.
committeeonccp
Posted - December 1, 2023 at 1:45 AM
Saved - December 2, 2023 at 5:51 AM

@committeeonccp - Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party

“Leaked audio from internal @tiktok_us shows that ByteDance employees in China accessed American user data.” — Ranking Member @CongressmanRaja https://t.co/IJGuTym4DJ

Video Transcript AI Summary
Leaked audio reveals that ByteDance employees in China accessed American user data in 2021 after Project Texas began. This raises concerns because if ByteDance, which is subject to CCP control, can access American user data, they can potentially hand it over to the CCP, regardless of what TikTok claims.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Leaked audio from internal TikTok meetings show that ByteDance employees in China accessed American user data in 2021 after Project Texas started. Right? Correct. And so regardless of what TikTok says, if ByteDance can access American user data and ByteDance is subject to CCP control, then ByteDance, regardless of what TikTok does, can fork over American user data to the CCP. Right? That's correct.
NFSCSpeak
Posted - December 6, 2023 at 8:54 PM
Saved - December 6, 2023 at 9:12 PM

@NFSCSpeak - NFSC Speaks

According to Miles Guo's revelation, TikTok is an intelligence platform; it is a weapon. Americans calling it a digital fentanyl. TikTok poisons young people's thoughts, instigates the divide, and creates all that turmoil and chaos in the U.S.. https://t.co/SHYYwrReaJ

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses where people get their news and information, pointing out that TikTok is seen as an intelligence platform and a weapon. They compare it to digital Fentanyl, claiming that it weakens America and poisons people's minds to create division and chaos. The speaker mentions Mike Gallagher's reference to cognitive domain warfare, highlighting the CCP's skill in psychological manipulation. They suggest that the CCP is not just making changes but also indoctrinating younger minds.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Where do they peep what do these people get their news? Where do they get their information 247? And the TikTok is basically no surprise to people because Miles Guo, according to his revelation, he told us this is intelligence platform. This is a weapon, you know, I mean, I remember a few Americans calling it a digital Fentanyl. This is absolutely truth. You know, Fentanyl is to basically weaken America, to kill Americans and no different than the TikTok. It's to to basically poison your brain and then instigate the divide and create all those, turmoil and chaos. So you could fight, you could, you know, pit Americans to Americans, and then, you know, the enemy is laughing. So this is what, Mike Gallagher, from the Slack Committee call referred to as a, cognitive domain warfare that the CCP is really, really skilled at. They have developed sophisticated very sophisticated techniques of psychological warfare about to basically influence you and change your beliefs and change your, actions and for for behavior control and manipulation purpose. Yeah. But, you know, I don't think that they're just actually just doing the changes. I'm thinking they're doing more of the indoctrination of it, especially with the younger minds because it's hard to teach your old dog new tricks.
committeeonccp
Posted - December 14, 2023 at 5:19 PM
Saved - December 14, 2023 at 7:03 PM

@committeeonccp - Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party

“If a CCP-affiliated company (@Gotion48660) is allowed to build a factory in the U.S., would it be an extended arm of the CCP and possibly be used in repressive activities?” — @RepMoolenaar “Most large Chinese companies have a Party office built into them.” - @SophieDRich https://t.co/lP7tFN7ExK

Video Transcript AI Summary
If a CCP-affiliated company builds a factory in the United States, there is concern that it could serve as an extension of the CCP and potentially be involved in repressive activities. This is because many large Chinese companies have a party office integrated within them.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: A if a CCP affiliated company is allowed to build a factory in the United States, would it be an extended arm of the CCP and possibly be used in repressive activities? Well, then almost most large Chinese companies have a party a party, office built into them.
committeeonccp
Posted - December 19, 2023 at 12:40 PM
Saved - December 20, 2023 at 12:33 PM

@committeeonccp - Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party

NEW: “We now have DIRECT EVIDENCE of Chinese government officials accessing a product that hosts secret @tiktok_us information.” Chairman @RepGallagher details all 24 members of the Select Committee’s call for the @FBI to provide Congress with its findings on TikTok. ⬇️ https://t.co/DZQA22XBeg

Video Transcript AI Summary
Last week, the China Select Committee and I urged the FBI to update Congress on its investigation into TikTok's Chinese parent company, ByteDance. Forbes revealed that ByteDance gave Chinese government regulators access to sensitive TikTok data. This means that the Chinese government can spy on and influence Americans through the app. ByteDance's own investigators admitted to tracking American journalists and accessing their data. Public data analysis also suggests that TikTok allows anti-Semitic bias while censoring content sensitive to the Chinese Communist Party. The State Department reported that ByteDance kept a list of users likely blocked for supporting Uyghur Muslims. The FBI needs to share its findings on ByteDance and TikTok with Congress promptly. Time is running out.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Last week, along with the entire bipartisan membership of the China Select Committee, I called on the FBI to update congress on its investigation into TikTok's Chinese parent company, ByteDance, and its ability to surveil and influence Americans through the app. Last month, Forbes revealed that in preparation for the Chinese Communist Party's 20th National Congress, ByteDance granted Chinese government regulators access to a back end system containing some of TikTok's most sensitive data. We now have direct evidence of Chinese government officials assessing a product that hosts secret TikTok information, something TikTok CEO swore he had no evidence of when he testified before congress earlier this share. Under ByteDance's ownership, the CCP can use TikTok to spy on Americans at will and influence the content they consume. Last year, ByteDance's own Internal investigators conceded that employees had tracked multiple American journalists covering TikTok, accessing their IP addresses and user data in the process. The new public data analysis So TikTok posts also suggest that ByteDance permits rampant anti Semitic bias on the platform while suppressing and censoring contact sensitive to the CCP. Praise for the infamous terrorist Osama Bin Laden recently trended on TikTok. While pro Israel hashtags are underrepresented by at least a 2 to 1 margin versus other similar platforms. According to a recent state department where ByteDance even kept a list of users who are likely blocked from TikTok for reasons such as supporting Uyghur Muslims who are currently subjected to a genocide in China. A regime that is committing such that he should not be able to silence US critics of his policies, let alone be able to surveil US users, prey on American children, and exploit sensitive US data to the detriment of our national security. FBI director Chris Wray told the senate that TikTok screams security concerns, but then barely elaborated. The American people and Representatives need to hear the same screams that he's hearing. The FBI must provide congress with its finding on ByteDance and TikTok as soon as possible. The clock is ticking.
SenatorHeinrich
Posted - January 9, 2024 at 5:51 PM
Saved - January 10, 2024 at 4:35 AM

@SenatorHeinrich - Martin Heinrich

This is extremely concerning evidence of how the Chinese Communist Party is using TikTok to achieve its political ends. Recognizing how much I sound like a dad, it needs to be said: Fun videos cannot outweigh our national security.

@ncri_io - Network Contagion Research Institute

TikTok's Global Platform Anomalies Align with the Chinese Communist Party's Geostrategic Objectives In collaboration + @RutgersU, our report takes a data-driven approach: Does TikTok promote or demote content on the basis of CCP interests? Short answer: It certainly seems so🧵 https://t.co/5OJdODIqfl

committeeonccp
Posted - January 30, 2024 at 4:31 PM
Saved - January 31, 2024 at 11:02 AM

@committeeonccp - Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party

“I have a tendency to describe @tiktok_us as nothing more than CCP malware. Is that hyperbolic or is that accurate?” - @RepDustyJohnson “I happen to think that’s accurate.” - Former Obama Administration Defense Secretary Leon Panetta. https://t.co/ayyE4vGu07

Video Transcript AI Summary
I describe TikTok as CCP malware, and I believe it is accurate.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I have a tendency to describe TikTok as nothing more than CCP malware. Is that hyperbolic or is that accurate? No. I I I am to think it's accurate.
committeeonccp
Posted - January 31, 2024 at 5:36 PM
Saved - January 31, 2024 at 11:47 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
CCP-affiliated company, Gotion, collaborated with PLA in my district. Concerns arise as Gotion intends to bring Chinese nationals to Michigan. FBI Director Wray highlights the blurred line between the Chinese government and its private sector.

@committeeonccp - Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party

“In my district, @Gotion48660, a CCP-affiliated company, worked with the PLA. Gotion plans to bring 20-50 Chinese nationals to Michigan. Will these individuals be spies?” — @RepMoolenaar “This traces back to the blurry, non-existent line, between the Chinese government and its ‘private sector.’” — @FBI Director Wray.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Goshen, a CCP-affiliated company, plans to build an electric vehicle battery factory in Speaker 0's district. The company has received a large sum of money from federal, state, and local taxes. Goshen intends to bring Chinese nationals to Michigan, raising concerns about potential espionage. Speaker 1 explains that the issue stems from the blurred line between the Chinese government and its private sector. The Chinese government's authority and access could be used to undermine national security.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: My own district, there's a company Goshen, which is a CCP affiliated company. It's worked with the PLA and many of its top leaders, including the leader of its North American operations have ties to the CCP. Goshen is, wanting to build an electric vehicle battery factory in my district, and it's been given 100 of 1,000,000 of dollars in federal, state and local tax dollars to do so. To build and operate its factory in my district, Goshen plans to bring 20 to 50 Chinese nationals to Michigan. If that happens, how confident are you that it will not be used for espionage? In other words, do you believe there's a risk these individuals will be buys working in the United States? Speaker 1: Well, I'd have to drill in deeper on the specific example to be able to weigh in on that. But what I What I can tell you is that, a lot of this ultimately traces back to, the blurry of non existent line Between the Chinese government, and its private sector, and their ability the Chinese government's ability to should they Choose to leverage that authority, that reach, that access, in a way that undermines our national security, which is
Mos_Translators
Posted - February 1, 2024 at 5:11 AM
Saved - February 1, 2024 at 6:44 PM

@Mos_Translators - MOS Himalaya

Rep. Cruz confronts #TikTok CEO: I don't believe you. Rep. Cruz points out that #TikTok must comply with the CCP's National Intelligence Law, and according to which, all organizations and citizens should support, assist, and cooperate with the CCP no matter where they are. https://t.co/u3GlE4xp10

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker asks Mr. Chu about China's National Intelligence Law and whether ByteDance, the owner of TikTok, is subject to it. Mr. Chu confirms that ByteDance is subject to the law, but mentions that TikTok is not available in mainland China. The speaker then questions whether the law compels people to lie to protect national intelligence secrets. Mr. Chu avoids commenting on that and reiterates that TikTok is not available in mainland China. The speaker expresses disbelief, stating that TikTok promotes different content in China compared to the United States, including educational videos versus self-harm and anti-Israel propaganda.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Mr. Chu, in the next couple of minutes I have, I want to turn to you. You're familiar with China's 2017 National Intelligence Law, which states, All organizations and citizens shall support, assist and cooperate with National Intelligence efforts in accordance with the law and shall protect national intelligence work secrets they are aware of. Speaker 1: Yes, I'm familiar with this. Speaker 0: TikTok is owned by ByteDance. Is ByteDance subject to the law? Speaker 1: For the Chinese businesses that ByteDance Yes, it will be subject to this, but TikTok is not available in mainland China. And Senator, as we talked about in your office, we built Project Texas to put this out Speaker 0: of reach. So ByteDance is subject to the law. Now under this law, which says shall protect National Intelligence work secrets they are aware of, it compels people subject to the law to lie to protect those secrets. Is that correct? Speaker 1: I cannot comment on that. What I said again is that we have not What did you have Speaker 0: to protect those secrets? Speaker 1: The Senator, TikTok is not available in mainland China. We have moved the data into an American Speaker 0: TikTok is controlled by ByteDance, which is subject to this law. Now you said earlier, you said and I wrote this down, we have not been asked for any data by the Chinese government and we have never provided it. I'm going to tell you and I told this when you and I met last week in my office, I do not believe you. And I'll tell you the American people don't either. If you look at what is on TikTok in China, you are promoting the kids science and math videos, educational videos and you limit the amount of times kids can be on TikTok. In the United States, you are promoting to kids self harm videos an anti Israel propaganda. Why is there such a dramatic difference?
TuckerCarlson
Posted - March 12, 2024 at 7:40 PM
Saved - March 13, 2024 at 10:45 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
In a classified briefing, AOC accused Elon of election interference by altering algorithms on X in 2022. This aligns with the anti-TikTok legislation, which could lead to forced sale of social media platforms involved in election interference in 2025.

@TuckerCarlson - Tucker Carlson

In a classified briefing this afternoon, attended by officials from the Biden Justice Department, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez claimed that Elon committed “election interference” in 2022 by “changing the algorithms” on X to alter the results of the midterms that year. Not coincidentally, the anti-TikTok legislation now being debated on the Hill would allow the federal government to force the sale of any social media platform that interferes in elections. Just so you know what’s coming in 2025.

KeithWoodsYT
Posted - March 13, 2024 at 3:14 PM
Saved - March 13, 2024 at 5:26 PM

@KeithWoodsYT - Keith Woods

🚨🇺🇲 Why is the US so keen to ban TikTok? It is about a foreign lobby, but it's not the Chinese 🇮🇱 https://t.co/UymyF9uJKt

Video Transcript AI Summary
They are pushing for a TikTok ban, with leaked recordings suggesting a powerful lobby influencing politicians. The Anti-Defamation League head highlights TikTok as a generational problem with significant political influence. A Time Magazine article calls for TikTok's sale or ban before the 2024 election, focusing on the lobby's control rather than China's involvement. It's revealed that a foreign government has infiltrated the US, but not the one commonly believed.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So they're pushing another TikTok ban built really hard, but something does not add up about it at all. Speaker 1: Bro, I've been trying to wrap my head around this for the last couple days, and nothing was making sense until I stumbled upon this leaked recording. First off, what I'm about to get into is highly controversial. It's extremely sensitive, so I'm gonna have to be really careful about it. This leaked recording is from about 4 or 5 months ago. It's Jonathan Greenblatt. He is the head of the Anti Defamation League. And so we really have a TikTok problem, a Gen Clear as day, we have a generational problem. We have a TikTok problem, and we're gonna need to put all our energy into this. If there's any lobby that owns more US politicians, it is this one. I can't really say it out loud, but this is the one. Democrats and Republicans alike fear this lobby's clout. We can count on well over half the house, 250 to 300 members to do whatever they want. In 24 hours, we could have the signatures of 70 senators on this napkin literally playing out right before our very eyes. There's also this Time Magazine article that just came out, why TikTok needs to be sold or banned before the 2024 election. The article barely even mentions China or election security. Almost the entirety of it focuses solely on this issue right here. Another chart from the article. And the ironic thing is that, yes, it's true. A foreign government has infiltrated the US, except it's just not the country they want you to think it is.
kikisknees
Posted - March 13, 2024 at 4:29 PM
Saved - March 13, 2024 at 5:30 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The House of Representatives has passed the TikTok ban bill with a vote of 356-92, and it is now moving to the Senate. There are concerns that this bill could extend beyond TikTok and give the government the power to control and censor content on various platforms. Some senators leading the charge are Mark Warner and Marco Rubio. Critics argue that this ban is a Trojan Horse and could be used to shut down other platforms before the election. The bill grants the White House the authority to define any platform as "foreign owned" and potentially control its content. There are suspicions that the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) is involved in this decision, aiming to manipulate the algorithm to favor pro-Israeli content over pro-Palestinian content.

@kikisknees - Kiki

The House of Representatives just rubber stamped the TikTok ban bill with a vote of 356-92. It's now moving on to the senate floor. https://t.co/7Cpa0vWijz

@kikisknees - Kiki

Wonder if the dual citizens in the Senate will put it on the president's desk? https://t.co/x0y9QWJqlY

@kikisknees - Kiki

This thing is a total Trojan Horse. It won't stop at TikTok, and the interests behind this will be free to use "Muh China," or "Muh Trump," or "Muh Elon" anytime they want to disable your favorite communication platforms like X, Telegram, discord, encryption services, Tor... (Look at the little sidebar article link on CNN XD)

@kikisknees - Kiki

Mark Warner and Marco Rubio, you say? Wonder why those guys are leading the charge in the senate?

@kikisknees - Kiki

https://t.co/3NttlJOtjP

@ToiletMarv - ToiletMarv

@kikisknees Most likely this will get used to shut down 𝕏 before the election. The TikTok ban bill gives the White House the power to define any platform/website as “foreign owned” even if domestic, giving them the ability to control/censor the content being published by the company. https://t.co/qf2L4Q3ANK

@kikisknees - Kiki

https://t.co/fkndejxVtZ

@OliverOrcbucks - DaddyOrcbucks

@kikisknees oy vey, people are disagreeing with our greatest ally?? Can't have that. https://t.co/QdqsFAspiF

@kikisknees - Kiki

Isn't it strange how the so-called Left and Right in congress never agree on anything, except for when it's on the one thing everybody knows is just so good for our country and its people?

@kikisknees - Kiki

Mr. Thomas Massie, @RepThomasMassie agrees with me: https://t.co/OkULeza5T3

@RepThomasMassie - Thomas Massie

The so-called TikTok ban is a trojan horse. The President will be given the power to ban WEB SITES, not just Apps. The person breaking the new law is deemed to be the U.S. (or offshore) INTERNET HOSTING SERVICE or App Store, not the “foreign adversary.” https://docs.house.gov/billsthisweek/20240311/HR%207521%20Updated.pdf https://t.co/P26hEbzQrf

@kikisknees - Kiki

It's all about the noticing. It can't be allowed. https://t.co/JNLIN1nw3o

@CensoredMen - Censored Men

🇺🇸🇨🇳 Who Is REALLY behind the TikTok ban? (🇮🇱) TikTok has 103 million monthly active users in the US. More than 1/3 (37.36%) of mobile internet users actively engage with TikTok. Half of TikTok’s US users are between the age of 10 and 29, with teens making up the bulk of the user base. Over 50% of content creators are between 18 and 24 years old. From October 23-30, 2023, posts with the # ‘standwithPalestine’ were posted 10x more than posts with the # ‘standwithIsrael’. Posts with the # ‘standwithPalestine’ also received 5x as many views. When TikTok was accused of deliberately pushing Pro-Palestinian content, they denied the claim and made it clear that the algorithm pushes whatever people engage with. Jonathan Greenblatt, the director of the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), which is an extremely powerful Jewish-Zionist organization that has often targeted free speech, was very worried by this. Seeing Gen Z in the US overwhelmingly support Palestine in the face of Israeli aggression, TERRIFIED him. Is it such a coincidence that today the ‘TikTok Ban Bill’ passes after MONTHS of congress pushing for it so heavily? They are demanding that the Chinese company ‘ByteDance’ sell the platform if the app wants to remain in the US. With the ADL being so entangled with this decision, I would imagine they’d want to manipulate the algorithm to push Pro-Israeli content while halting Pro-Palestinian content. The Chinese lobby isn’t a lobby Americans should be worried about, it’s the Zionist one. Because the Zionist lobby has been altering US domestic and foreign policy for over half a century.

Video Transcript AI Summary
There is a push for a TikTok ban bill, with leaked recordings suggesting a generational issue. The head of the Anti Defamation League mentions a lobby influencing US politicians, leading to bipartisan support for the ban. An article calls for TikTok to be sold or banned before the 2024 election, focusing on the lobby's power rather than China or election security. It suggests a different foreign government has infiltrated the US.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So they're pushing another TikTok ban bill really hard. But something does not add up about it at all. Speaker 1: Bro, I've been trying to wrap my head around this for the last couple days, and nothing was making sense until I stumbled upon this leaked recording. First off, what I'm about to get into is highly controversial. It's extremely sensitive, so I'm gonna have to be really careful about it. This leaked recording is from about 4 or 5 months ago. It's Jonathan Greenblatt. He is the head of the Anti Defamation League. Speaker 2: And so we really have a TikTok problem, a Gen z problem, and, again, like, we've been chasing this left right divide. It's the wrong game, Speaker 1: Clear as day, we have a generational problem. We have a TikTok problem, and we're gonna need to put all our energy into this. If there's any lobby that owns more US politicians, it is this one. I can't really say it out loud, but this is the one. Democrats and Republicans alike fear this lobby's clout. We can count on well over half the house, 250 to 300 members to do reflexively whatever they want. In 24 hours, we could have the signatures of 70 senators on this napkin. Literally playing out right before our very eyes. There's also this Time Magazine article that just came out, why TikTok needs to be sold or banned before the 2024 election. The article barely even mentions China or election security. Almost the entirety of it focuses solely on this issue right here. Another chart from the article. And the ironic thing is that, yes, it's true. A foreign government has infiltrated the US, except it's just not the country they want you to think it is.
Resist_05
Posted - March 13, 2024 at 9:48 PM
Saved - March 14, 2024 at 11:38 AM

@Resist_05 - Pelham

This is why they’re banning TikTok… https://t.co/UBtHA8OuOf

Cancelcloco
Posted - August 27, 2024 at 8:55 PM
Saved - August 27, 2024 at 10:31 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
RFK openly acknowledged the CIA's interference in the 2020 election, which I believe is undeniable and without consequences. I predicted that TikTok would remove my post, and they did so in under an hour, highlighting their role in mass election interference. My appeal was rejected, and my account faced punishment, demonstrating how they manipulate what is considered "truth."

@Cancelcloco - Ian Carroll

RFK finally said the quiet part out loud. The CIA interfered in the 2020 election in broad daylight and we all know it. Indisputably. Factually. Zero consequences. Zero accountability. https://t.co/p1lcYFqXW9

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims the CIA interfered in the 2020 election, referencing RFK Jr.'s statements and using the word "tomatoes" in place of "interference." They allege that platforms censoring this information are complicit in election interference. The speaker discusses a letter signed by 51 former senior intelligence officials who suggested that emails from Hunter Biden's laptop had "classic earmarks of a Russian information operation." The speaker points out that the officials admitted they didn't know if the emails were genuine or if Russia was involved. The speaker identifies some of the signatories as known liars, including James Clapper, Michael Hayden, and Gina Haspel. The speaker claims the CIA is forbidden from interfering in American elections but does so anyway to discredit information, including information related to Hunter Biden. They reference court testimony alleging Joe Biden was aware of and influenced by Hunter's business dealings. The speaker also references Bill Clinton's relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. The speaker concludes by criticizing intelligence agencies for meddling and lying, and praises those who seek truth and honesty.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm about to talk about what we're not allowed to talk about. So instead of the word interference, I'm gonna use the word tomatoes just for fun, and you'll understand what I mean here. Because RFK said a lot of amazing things on the Tucker Carlson interview he just did, But one big thing that he said out loud that no one's been saying out loud yet is that the CIA actively did election tomatoes in the 2020 election, and we all know it. And it's well proven, and it's not controversial, but no one wants to admit it or talk about it. And I'm just gonna throw some shots across the bow right now at the start of this video that any platform that censors this video is actively engaging in election tomatoes again by censoring not only free speech but true free speech that is being critical of their handlers in the agency. Speaker 1: And Democrats can't even hear this story because it touches so many sort of culture war buttons, but it's it's a true story that a 100 of Biden's laptop suddenly became an issue about a week before the debate. And Anthony Blinken, who is now the secretary of the state and who is then the director of president Biden's campaign, went to Gina Haspel, who is the head of this director of the CIA, and and said to her, we need help with this. She then got 51 CIA current and former CIA officers. Speaker 0: Remember this whole headline? Everything you just said is true, and I'm about to show you the original sources, the actual documents. This is just basic facts. More than 50 former senior intelligence officials, it was 51 to be exact, signed this letter outlining their belief that recent disclosed emails about the laptop has all the classic earmarks of a Russian information operation. This is the actual letter, which no one decided to actually read because they lay out their allegations, and then they say, quote, we want to emphasize that we do not know if the emails provided to the New York Post by president Trump's personal attorney Giuliani are genuine or not, and that we do not have evidence of Russian involvement. Just that our experience makes us deeply suspicious that the Russian government played a significant role in this case. So literally nothing. They're just making up claims to do what exactly? I mean, it's not like the CIA has been doing election tomatoes all across the world ever since it was first founded. Look it up. They do it with bags of cash. They do it with coups. They do it with assassins, All sorts of things. In this case, they do it with information. And all 51 of these dudes sign this letter, and at the bottom, it tells you who they are. This is all of their names in the order in which they appear, and you only need to look up the first two to realize, Jim Clapper, former director of National Intelligence? Yeah. He perjured himself when he lied to us about the NSA spying operations. Oh, and Michael Hayden? Yeah. He set up those NSA spying operations, lied to us about them, and then he also lied to us about the torture programs at places like Guantanamo Bay. Oh, and by the way, Gina Haskill, the CIA director that RFK was referencing at the start, the one that got this all moving, yeah, she was actually involved in those illegal torture programs, and then she helped cover it up by destroying, like, a whole bunch of tapes of those programs at a black site. So the list of top intelligence officials are literally professional deep state liars, and we know that factually. I mean, if you knew history, you would know that before you even knew that because the job of the CIA is to lie to you. Think about it. You don't need a covert intelligence agency to do things that you're allowed to do in the open. Then you would just do it with the normal government. And this letter was originally provided to Politico by former top aid under CIA director John Brennan, Nick Shapiro. Nick Shapiro is an expert in crisis management for the CIA, like the kind of crisis where the guy you want to get into office suddenly has this big scandal coming out and you need to discredit it. That kind of crisis. Don't worry about the fact that the CIA is expressly forbidden from interfacing with anything on American soil and definitely with anything to do with elections. Definitely no election tomatoes here in America. Just protecting us from disinformation. And not just the kind of disinformation that is wildly embarrassing and not just the kind of disinformation that implies straight up pedophilic interest in his child niece. There's pretty much only one reason why a dude, duplicates the same photo of his child niece in her bathing suit over and over and over again all throughout his camera roll. Does it with pictures of her friends too. Has, like, whole photo shoots. It's super messed up. But, obviously, it was done to him and his siblings in their childhood too. Whole other rabbit hole. These things happen in cycles. But But it also had evidence of all sorts of much more governmental level corruption that you can find in reports like the court testimony of Jason Galantes, Hunter Biden's 3rd business partner, the one that would not play ball, and so they tried to lock him up and keep him out of the courtroom so that he could not tell the true story of what Hunter Biden had been up to, where he clearly alleges that he has multiple instances of knowing without any doubt that mister Joe Biden was very much aware of Hunter's business deals and was very much influenced on behalf of Hunter. This is in reference to China, but we all know it was in reference to Ukraine too, where it conveniently, a little war did you doozy happened? But, anyways, the letter was enough for Biden to call it misinformation on the debate stage and brush it aside for the mainstream media to run cover in every single publication, just fucking propaganda, despite us now having house oversight committee documents clearly detailing the forensic analysis of the actual accounts, bank accounts, money transferring in and out of Biden family bank accounts. But somehow people still wanna bury their head in the sand because they've been programmed to be so angry about this orange guy that they can't even face up to the fact that maybe there's more going on here. Like, oh, you could never believe that the president of the United States would do something like that? He would never be corrupt like that? First of all, not even up to him. It's the CIA doing these things, and we all know how they do. And second of all, I've got news for you. Mister Bill Clinton, the president of the United States, pause, think about it. He was inviting Jeffrey to the White House, like, 17 times. He was engaging in the services that Epstein provided all throughout his presidency, and they just invited him to speak at the DNC as if you don't have a memory, as if you don't know who he really is. This isn't like, oh, he likes chocolate ice cream on the side, and that's silly. This is like hello? What Bill was actually up to makes the Monica Lewinsky scandal seem like a typo. And what the CIA is actually up to is everything they accuse Orange Man Bat of doing. And don't get me wrong. I don't have any great love for Orange Man. I just abhor intelligence agencies meddling in our shit and then pretending like they're protecting us. So props to RFK for speaking the truth, finally, even at great personal risk. Props to anyone who's thinking for themselves. Props to Tucker for hosting great conversations. You don't need to agree with people these days on every topic in order to realize that some people are here for truth and honesty and righteousness and just whatever's real, and other people are straight up fucking lying. At this point, it's not about less than rights. It's not about reds and blues. It's about the liars, the corrupt, the evil, and those who have real opinions and honesty and integrity and are gonna have respectful conversations about our differences, not make up lies, tomato elections, and destroy our country. That's pretty much where we're at now, so basically, fuck the CIA.

@Cancelcloco - Ian Carroll

I literally captioned it predicting TikTok would take it down. Took them less than an hour. TikTok is engaging in election interference right now on a mass scale. This is just one instance of MANY https://t.co/b06b27MsVI

@Cancelcloco - Ian Carroll

And appeal rejected. Strike added. Account punished. This is how they control the “truth” https://t.co/sZlQwzIicn

TheOfficial1984
Posted - January 19, 2025 at 8:04 PM
Saved - January 19, 2025 at 10:16 PM

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

.......and who owns Oracle? .......who also owns X? We are witnessing the largest consolidation of power and control over the narrative and user data to ever take place in the history of the internet. https://t.co/gxJjfj6htS

@IanCarrollShow - Ian Carroll

TikTok had nothing to do with China. All of its data centers were in Texas overseen, along with its algorithms by Oracle- a CIA front company. If you had been on TikTok you would have seen that the censorship was CIA and Mossad oriented, not CCP. I posted videos about tienamin square, Uyghur Muslims, Tibet and more- no censorship at all. Post about Jeffrey Epstein, the CIA, Mossad, AIPAC, video taken down. You’re falling for government propaganda by parroting the China fears.

americasgreat
Posted - April 10, 2025 at 12:06 PM
Saved - April 11, 2025 at 5:25 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I question why Elvis Chan, the Chinese Assistant Special Agent in Charge at the FBI's San Francisco office, remains involved in election and cybersecurity matters. He played a significant role in the Judiciary Committee's investigation into government overreach in censoring social media content, often targeting right-leaning views. Chan was deeply involved with social media companies during the 2020 election and attempted to access Twitter data without a warrant. Additionally, he allegedly lied under oath regarding the Hunter Biden laptop and had extensive access to information that influenced election integrity.

@americasgreat - Futurist™

Why is Elvis Chan, Chinese Assistant Special Agent in Charge (ASAC) still working at the FBI San Francisco field office on election and cybersecurity? Chan played a "pivotal figure" in the Judiciary Committees investigation into the federal government overstepping its authority by coercing social media companies, including Meta, X, and YouTube, to censor content that often suppressed right-leaning viewpoints. You can here Chan talk about it live in an interview, even though the Judiciary Committee had to sue the DOJ to get him to do an interview: https://www.bankinfosecurity.com/fbis-elvis-chan-on-election-cybersecurity-a-13852 "Chan described himself as 'one of the primary people with pass-through information,' information that the companies used when deciding whether to restrict online content," the committee wrote. Chan held as many as seven D.C.-based FBI agents held weekly meetings with Twitter and Facebook executives during the 2020 race "led a team of other FBI agents who regularly communicated with social media companies. Chan was involved with Russia in election misinformation story and had direct contact with Election County offices. Chan attempted to access Twitter data OUTSIDE of a warrant policy. https://www.c-span.org/clip/house-committee/user-clip-fbi-agent-elvis-chan-attempts-to-access-twitter-data-outside-of-a-warrant-policy/5058272 Best part, Chan lied under oath about knowledge of the Hunter Biden laptop, talks with Facebook, Judiciary document reveals. https://nypost.com/2023/08/07/fbi-agent-lied-about-knowledge-of-hunter-biden-laptop-talks-with-facebook/ Here is a 30 plus minute interview with Elvis Chan where he describes the amount of access he had in the FBI- directing Social Media Companies on Hunter and Joe, overseeing Chinese cyberterrorism, essentially was the cyber gateway keeper to elections. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N826H3gfQBU This is the guy protecting the American vote in elections. Feel safe? @FBIDDBongino @FBIDirectorKash @realDonaldTrump @AGPamBondi @LauraLoomer

FBI agent lied under oath about knowledge of Hunter Biden laptop, talks with Facebook, document reveals An FBI agent lied about discussions he had with big tech companies that suppressed reports on the contents of first son Hunter Biden’s laptop hard drive before the 2020 election, according to an internal Facebook document. nypost.com
KanekoaTheGreat
Posted - June 2, 2025 at 3:23 PM
Saved - July 24, 2025 at 1:38 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’ve uncovered alarming evidence about the FBI's involvement in concealing the Chinese Communist Party's infiltration of U.S. election systems through Konnech, a Michigan-based software company. This company, linked to Chinese firms, has been managing critical election logistics while storing sensitive voter data on Chinese servers. Despite a serious investigation initiated by field agents, FBI headquarters intervened, flipping the narrative and targeting whistleblowers instead. After facing legal challenges, we exposed Konnech's ties to the CCP, revealing a troubling connection that threatens election integrity.

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

🚨EXCLUSIVE: @FBIDirectorKash & @FBIDDBongino: Expose the FBI and Gascón’s Konnech–CCP Election Software Cover-Up Strong evidence shows that corrupt FBI officials and former LADA George Gascón deliberately concealed CCP infiltration of U.S. election systems—because exposing it would have politically benefited @realDonaldTrump. @Kash_Patel & @dbongino now have a rare opportunity: expose how deeply politicized the FBI became, remove CCP-controlled software from America’s elections, and finish an investigation that was already 90% complete before it was sabotaged. At the center of the scandal is Konnech, a Michigan-based election software company secretly developed and financed by two Chinese firms—Jinhua Yulian Network and Jinhua Hongzheng Technology—under contract with China’s National People’s Congress and in partnership with state-owned giants like Huawei, China Telecom, China Unicom, China Mobile, and Lenovo. Konnech’s flagship product, PollChief, is used to manage poll worker scheduling, equipment deployment, and logistics in major U.S. cities including Los Angeles, San Francisco, Detroit, Washington D.C., Fairfax County, and St. Louis. In early 2021, @TrueTheVote's Catherine Engelbrecht and Gregg Phillips discovered that Konnech was storing the personally identifiable information (PII) of U.S. election workers, judges, and voters on servers in China. Using open-source tools like Binary Edge, they traced PollChief to Chinese IP addresses—where they found unsecured databases containing names, Social Security numbers, addresses, bank information, voter roll data, polling location schematics, provisional ballot serial numbers, and even passwords for voting machines. They alerted FBI field offices in Detroit and San Antonio, where agents took the threat seriously and launched a 15-month counterintelligence investigation. But in April 2022—just before the release of Dinesh D’Souza’s 2000 Mules, a film on 2020 election fraud featuring True the Vote—FBI headquarters in Washington, D.C. intervened and flipped the investigation on its head. Field agents warned Engelbrecht and Phillips that they, not Konnech, were now considered the threat. Two senior female FBI officials in Washington D.C. were reportedly preparing criminal charges against them rather than Konnech’s CEO Eugene Yu. Engelbrecht was warned she and Phillips might be prosecuted for accessing Konnech’s data on Chinese servers. The FBI even tipped off Konnech about the investigation—compromising the case—and began circulating internal accusations that Phillips had committed cybercrimes, referring those allegations to the CIA and NSA. Phillips said their goal was to “Roger Stone” him—publicly smear and criminalize him as they had done to Trump allies. In fear for their safety, a field agent advised Engelbrecht and Phillips to take the “nuclear option”—go public. On August 13, 2022, they did just that at The Pit, a closed-door briefing in Arizona with 200 cybersecurity experts, journalists, and election integrity investigators. Two weeks later, Konnech sued them. In a stunning series of courtroom actions, Engelbrecht and Phillips were jailed and held in solitary confinement—until the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals ordered their immediate release. The FBI stood by and let it happen. After their release, they published thousands of documents exposing Konnech’s ties to China. Within days, Konnech dropped the lawsuit. Meanwhile, independent researchers quickly pieced together Eugene Yu’s background. Born in China, Jianwei Yu (于建伟) graduated from Zhejiang University in 1982 and worked for the CCP from 1983 to 1985 as a project manager in the Guangzhou Economic and Technological Development Zone. He moved to the U.S. in 1986 to pursue an MBA at Wake Forest University. In 2002, Yu founded Konnech. By November 2005, he had launched a Chinese subsidiary—Jinhua Yulian Network—funded and overseen by the CCP. That same year, he was profiled as an “overseas scholar” in a Chinese-language publication by the China Association for Science and Technology (CAST) and the American Zhu Kezhen Education Foundation (AZKEF). CAST is a formal CCP arm linking Chinese leadership with overseas scientists and technologists. AZKEF, where Yu served on the finance committee, flew U.S. researchers—including Harvard’s Charles Lieber—to Chinese universities. Lieber was later arrested for failing to disclose his ties to China’s Thousand Talents Plan, one of the CCP’s many programs that recruit foreign experts to encourage the illicit transfer of intellectual property back to China. Konnech’s Chinese ties ran deep. It partnered with Michigan State University’s Confucius Institute, developed software in CCP-run tech parks, and directly served China’s National People’s Congress (NPC) and the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference (CPPCC). On January 25, 2006, Yu’s Chinese company was accepted into the Chinese Academy of Sciences’ Jinhua Science and Technology Park—a CCP-controlled tech incubator. From that point on, Jinhua Yulian Network and Konnech, were financed, developed, and controlled by the Chinese Communist Party. Just a month later, on February 25, 2006, Yu registered the domain yu-lian .cn for Jinhua Yulian Network using his Konnech email address (eyu@konnech .com). Archived versions of the company’s Chinese-language website show Yu praising “Comrade Jiang Zemin” and the Chinese Communist Party, while promoting Konnech’s software products used by the National People’s Congress, the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference, Election Management Solutions Detroit, and U.S. Overseas Voters. In December 2006, Konnech partnered with the Confucius Institute to build a Chinese communication platform called ChineseBrief .com. Yu registered CNBrief LLC, launched www.cnbrief .com, and displayed a banner in Chinese that translated to: “Chinese Brief – Overseas Chinese Network.” Confucius Institutes are CCP-funded cultural centers embedded in Western universities that U.S. intelligence agencies and lawmakers have long warned operate under the direction of the CCP. On July 18, 2007, an archived Chinese government website showed Yu offering a 5 million yuan (~$700,000 USD) software development contract on behalf of Jinhua Yulian Network, again using his Konnech email address and website.

BasedSamParker
Posted - September 23, 2025 at 12:54 AM
Saved - September 23, 2025 at 11:30 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I discussed the implications of Charlie Kirk's assassination and its timing with the TikTok takeover by pro-Israel billionaires. Kirk was a vocal supporter of TikTok and opposed censorship efforts, particularly from Jonathan Greenblatt of the ADL. The acquisition of TikTok and its algorithm changes raise questions about whether Kirk's opposition posed a threat significant enough to warrant his removal. I drew parallels to JFK's assassination, suggesting that motives behind such actions may not be fully understood at the time, and emphasized the strategic importance of TikTok for Israel's future.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

1/ TIKTOK CAPTURE BY ISRAEL: CHARLIE KIRK ASSASSINATION MOTIVE? FACT: Charlie Kirk vocally opposed censoring Tiktok over anti-israel content, and specifically attacked Jonathan Greenblatt of the ADL for trying to get hate speech censorship imposed on social media companies. FACT: It was Greenblatt who helped lead the effort to force the sale of Tiktok to a consortium of pro-israel jewish billionaires just one week after Charlie was killed. FACT: The White House has acknowledged the Tiktok algorithm will now be altered under the direction of its new pro-israel jewish owners. FACT: Recapturing the support of Gen Z has been a top priority for israel since 10-7. "We have a major major major generational problem." - Jonathan Greenblatt Given the lengths & efforts israel went to secure this acquisition—including getting Tiktok shut down—is it fair to wonder whether potentially fierce opposition from Charlie Kirk was a sufficient motivation for removing him, regardless of his otherwise generous support for israel? You might say, "If israel needed the support of young people back, why would it get rid of its top supporter amongst the youth?" Perhaps a comparison is in order: in his time, JFK was seen as a strong supporter of israel, a pro-israel zionist, and a stalwart ally to the jewish people—but, he had been engaged in trying to get the AZC (the forerunner of AIPAC) registered as a foreign agent lobby under FARA. At the time, the American public barely noticed and little appreciated just how important the jewish/israeli lobby was seen by israel to its existence & future. It's now generally accepted by many that this effort to stop AIPAC was likely one of the motives behind israel's alleged role in the JFK assassination. We see now the stranglehold israel has on us through AIPAC, but the public didn't see or know back then what it would become. Are we experiencing something similar with respect to Charlie Kirk & Tiktok? Something that doesn't look like a big enough deal to us now to merit assassination, but will end up being a much bigger deal in hindsight? We do know israel wants this Tiktok censorship & control at any cost. They see it as strategically vital to their existence and future. Any opposition from Charlie would have been seen as a threat. The only question is how big a threat? Sadly, we'll never know how any opposition from Charlie over jewish/israeli censorship of Tiktok would have played out. That scenario died with him. Cui bono?

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

2/ Charlie was a huge fan of Tiktok and a very vocal critic of censoring it. https://t.co/yf0nyjGRQE

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

3/ In June, Charlie was excited that Trump had saved Tiktok from shut-down for another 90 days until September 17th. Is the timing of Charlie's death & the Tiktok takeover just a coincidence? https://t.co/bOpeYxOdQD

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

4/ Jonathan Greenblatt called on their jewish brains to figure out how to recapture the youth. In spite of Charlie Kirk's efforts at TPUSA, the youth were still straying. Keeping Charlie around was a net neutral decision. But opposition from Charlie over Tiktok censorship would have been a net negative.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

5/ Pro-israel jewish billionaires will now control the algorithm and censorship on Tiktok. How do you think Charlie would have reacted to this? What would he have said to his college kids? https://t.co/CWAbSHPliF

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

6/ Read more about how the public missed the jewish/israeli role the JFK assassination: https://t.co/SG4LbigIfM

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

1/ "Charlie Kirk was a zionist and one of israel's strongest supporters, why would they kill him?" Please allow me to explain why this isn't necessarily as robust a falsification of the "israel did it" theory as you might think. 🔖This essay thread. When JFK was assassinated in 1963, no one suspected israel or jewry, nor did they for decades. Why? 3 reasons: 1. At the time, JFK was perceived as being a great ally to jews and a strong supporter of israel & zionism. This cannot be overstated. This would have been the position of regular people and insiders alike. 2. Certain aspects and motives we now ascribe to israel/jewry for being behind the assassination were mostly not known. (Ex: Nukes/Fight with David Ben-Gurion, Palestinian Right of Return, Withdrawal from Vietnam, James Angleton & his army of jewish spies, Yitzhak Rabin was in Dallas that day) 3. Certain aspects and motives that were known but not appreciated by audiences of the time to be as important as we now understand them to have been. (Ex: Jack Ruby, Jolly West, AZC/AIPAC/FARA Registration, Zapruder) Applying the experience, it's possible the actual motives behind assassinating Charlie Kirk might not actually be known, yet, or they might be known and they don't seem as important to us Gentiles right now as they actually are. I submit that a surface-level understanding, or even a moderately critical view, of Charlie's known support for israel isn't nececssarily a sufficient test to rule out israeli/jewish involvement. That level of knowledge, analysis & understanding is why no one suspected jews/israel of being behind the JFK assassination for so long. Let's look at that JFK case, now.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@IvdeaDelenaEst JFK was their top guy in 1963. I guess you missed that part. The US was their top ally in 1967. They still attacked the USS Liberty. The US was their "Greatest Ally" in 2001. It still helped carry out 9/11. You clearly don't know or understand these people.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

@andrewj081981 https://t.co/h7jtjItVdb

DiligentDenizen
Posted - September 27, 2025 at 8:16 AM
Saved - September 27, 2025 at 6:28 PM

@DiligentDenizen - Diligent Denizen 🇺🇸

‼️🇺🇸: “We have to control TikTok as that’s number 1, then we have to control X —talk to Elon, Elon is our friend” "With the help of our American influencers" 👀 What? 🤔 https://t.co/lvuZqmHjbj

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker discusses Christian influencers and the 'woke right,' calling them insane and noting they are 'meeting on some of the things.' He says the base of support in the United States is being challenged systematically, 'a lot of this is done with money. Money of NGOs, vast. Money of governments, faster.' To fight back, he urges engaging 'Our influencers' and using battle tools. He states 'the weapons change over time' and that 'the most important ones are social media.' He highlights that 'the most important purchase that is going on right now is glass Followers. Five followers. TikTok.' 'TikTok. Number one. Number one.' He ends: 'Now if we can get those two things, we get a lot,' and 'We have to fight the fight, okay, to take give direction to the Jewish people and give direction to our non Jewish friends or those who could be our Jewish our friends.'
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Christian influencers. Okay. You said you talked about the woke right, and you said, I call it the woke right. That's a brilliant I don't know if the woke right because these people, you know, they're not any different from the woke left. I mean, they're they're insane. They're amazing. But they're actually meeting on some of the things. And what we have to do is we have to secure that part of our the base of our support in The United States. That is being challenged systematically. A lot of this is done with money. Money of NGOs, vast. Money of governments, faster. Okay? We have to fight back. How do we fight back? Our influencers. I think you should also talk to them if you have a chance to that that community. They're very important. And secondly, we're gonna have to use the tools of battle. You know, the the weapons change over time. You can't fight today with swords. That doesn't work very well. Okay? And you can't fight with the fight with cavalry. That doesn't work very well. And you have these new things, you know, like drones, things like that. I won't get into that. But we have to fight with the weapons that apply to the battlefields in which we're engaged. And the most important ones are social media. And the most important purchase that is going on right now is glass Followers. Five followers. TikTok. Barnes? TikTok. Oh. TikTok. Number one. Number one. And I hope it goes through because it's it can be consequential. He's a friend. We should talk to him. Now if we can get those two things, we get a lot, and I could go on on other things, but that's not the point right now. We have to fight the fight, okay, to take give direction to the Jewish people and give direction to our non Jewish friends or those who could be our Jewish our friends. Are we
View Full Interactive Feed