reSee.it - Related Post Feed
@VictorFromDE - Victor Scott
Nurse Erin continued. /4 https://t.co/In1J6adX2A
Video Transcript AI Summary
He was caring for a patient who was doing well, but suddenly transferred to the emergency room. Shortly after, the patient died, leaving the speaker questioning if the hospital's actions led to his death. The speaker is confused and upset, feeling that the patient shouldn't have died and suspecting foul play.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What killed him? Was being did the vent kill him? Yeah. Oh, yes. They're so sedated.
He had probably 8 or 9 drips. It's all sedation. She made this recording on what ended up being her last day at the hospital. I've been taking care of a patient for, like, a week right now. Who is this my and I call them.
And He's been doing great. He has a trach put in and he's been doing great. He's been talking, like, or communicating with me. He's telling me, like, laughing at my jokes and talking to his kids on FaceTime a couple days ago. And I told him that.
I told his kids that he was doing fine. And he and he was. And today, I was given him, and they came in. They told me that I need to leave the room, and I have to give report to somebody else. They took me from that unit.
They put me in the emergency room. And they don't need me there, but they put me there. And I'm not even there, like, 20 minutes. Not even there 20 minutes and I hear a code being called in my room that I was just left. And it's him.
And he was fine. He was fine. I don't understand that nothing makes sense. Like, why would they take me out of his room and put me in the ED? And then not 20 minutes later, he's dead.
It doesn't make sense. Like, did they kill him? He was my one patient that was gonna live. He shouldn't have died. I don't know what they did to him.
Something's not right.
@dksdata - David Dickson
#Pharmacy is ready to support primary care needs throughout this country. #cof #cdnpoli #pharmacy #futureofpharmacy @ShelsRx
@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense
Doctors During Covid #SC https://t.co/JqmchcY472
@ABDanielleSmith - Danielle Smith
This morning, I am joined by Ministers Adriana LaGrange, Dan Williams, and Jason Nixon on refocusing Alberta's health care system. https://t.co/8mhmFekXwD
@CartlandDavid - Dr David Cartland
Why are doctors and nurses still silent?? It’s literally inexplicable…..it’s 2023…..please let me know thoughts below!
@ChildrensHD - Children’s Health Defense
Covid Nurse Speak Out https://t.co/6foLLU7bfZ
@iluminatibot - illuminatibot
We now live in a nation where doctors destroy health https://t.co/aOOLDV4l4i
Video Transcript AI Summary
Most physicians and clinicians avoid getting involved in the issue of profit-driven healthcare. The real problem lies in the collusion between academic institutions, doctors, medical journals, and industry for financial gain. These corporations, as legal entities, often exhibit psychopathic traits, prioritizing profit over the well-being of patients. Many top drug companies have been fined billions for illegal marketing, hiding harm data, and manipulating results. However, these fines are often outweighed by the profits they make from selling the drugs. While the pharmaceutical industry has contributed life-saving treatments, the net effect of their practices is negative, with a significant amount of wasted resources and harmful drugs approved.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: That you were able to survive this. But for the most part, most physicians, most doctors, most clinicians, they don't wanna get involved in that, And so they toe the line.
Speaker 1: Yep. I think you've hit the hit the nail on the head. So let's give it some context here as well. So yes, legal responsibility to provide profit for shareholders, not to give you the best treatment. But the real scandals are the Those with a responsibility, Joe, to scientific integrity, academic institutions, doctors, medical journals, collude with industry for financial gain.
And the the or quite often, though and and I know you discussed, you know, in detail around the whole Vioxx scandal with John. But quite often, the way that these big corporations operate as legal entities, they're not pointing fingers at people Within them, you know. I met Pascal Sauteris. Had dinner with him, who's the CEO of AstraZeneca. You know, he even sent me a book, afterwards, you know, to my home address.
He knows where I live, so I better be careful. But he seemed like a nice guy. Right? But in their roles, They have they they are only responsible to their shareholders. But the problem is, and we see this historically, It's quite often.
And doctor Robert Hare is a forensic psychologist who was behind the original international we call DSM criteria for psychopathy. And he says that as these legal entities quite often in the way they conduct their business actually fulfill the criteria for psychopath. So callous unconcern For the feelings of others, incapacity to experience guilt, deceitfulness, conning others for profit. And we have precedent. We have history of that.
You know, between 2003 and 2016, most of the top ten, Most of the top 10 drug companies paid fines totaling about $33,000,000,000 for illegal marketing of drugs, hiding data on harms, and manipulation of results. And, you know, and when those crimes were committed, in most cases, they end up making more profit from sales of the drugs than they do from The fines. The fines.
Speaker 0: Like biopsy.
Speaker 1: So there's no incentive to stop doing what they're doing. Right. And ultimately, you know, the patients suffer. But I don't wanna throw the baby out with the bathwater here, because someone might say, well, hold on, doctor Malhotra, but aren't the drug industry responsible for all these life saving treatments and blah blah blah? And yes, they are.
But the question is, what is the net effect of them? So if you look at, in the last 20 years, so I'll just take give you some examples here. Between 20,021,008, of the 667 drugs approved by the FDA, only 70 75% of them We're found to be copies of old ones. So the drug companies will change a few molecules here and there on an old drug, rebrand it, rename it, patent it, make lots Some money and then they move on and they move on to the next one. Right?
So there's huge waste. Only 11% of them were found to be truly innovative, as in a therapeutic clinical benefit Benefit over the previous drugs. So there's all this waste. In France, something similar between 20,021,011, Of almost 1,000 drugs were approved by their regulator. Again, most of them are copies of old ones.
But About double the amount of drugs, Joe. 15% of those drugs were approved were found to be more harmful than beneficial compared to about 8% that were therapeutic benefits. So what does that mean when you look at it in its totality with the waste and the harm? The overall net effect of the drug industry, in my view, on society in the last 2 decades Has been a negative one.
@MargTokar - Katy E
SUPPORT OUR DRS! Smith thinks she can manipulate Albertans. Albertans CAN walk & chew gum at the same time! WE SUPPORT TRANS KIDS. WE SUPPORT OUR MDs. Please REPOST! Keep it going!
@FredDiBiase247 - 𝗙𝗿𝗲𝗱 𝗗𝗶𝗕𝗶𝗮𝘀𝗲 ①
Did you know doctors receives report cards? Must Watch👇🏽👇🏽 https://t.co/oKNyU61g8w
Video Transcript AI Summary
Doctors push health maintenance exams because early cancer detection improves outcomes. Doctors have metrics to meet, including a certain percentage of exams, or they face consequences like disciplinary action or job loss. It's not personal, it's about meeting requirements.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Why does your doctor push a lot of health maintenance exams so much and so fervently? I'm doctor Brady Cassiano. I am a board certified internal medicine physician who also practices integrative medicine, which combines both traditional Western medicine as well as natural options. I like to lean toward the natural side. But things like colonoscopies, mammograms, pap smears, your your doctor may be pushing.
It might be pushing rather aggressively, and sometimes you don't agree. But here is one of the reasons why. Outside of the fact that early detection of cancer increases your chances of doing better, but doctors get report cards. We get reports on what we call our metrics. And if we don't get a certain percentage of those exams, we get dinged.
And sometimes that could mean disciplinary action and even potentially losing a job. So don't get mad at your doctor.
@SBakerMD - Dr Shawn Baker 🥩
How can a physician be so darn clueless? https://t.co/ZYZwLDIkoW
Video Transcript AI Summary
A lipidologist comments on the dynamic variability of cholesterol levels, criticizing extreme fasting and exercise as abnormal and dangerous. The speaker argues that such practices are consistent with human history and physiology, challenging conventional medical beliefs. The lipid energy model is discussed, highlighting the body's ability to adapt to energy demands. The speaker criticizes modern medicine's reliance on pharmaceuticals and lack of understanding of human biology. The absurdity of the lipidologist's comments is emphasized, with the speaker questioning the necessity of constant eating and sedentary behavior. The speaker concludes by inviting feedback on the topic.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Check this out. This is a, physician, a lipidologist, by the way, who commented on the fact that, you know, I'd mentioned the other day that I had checked my cholesterol over 2 subsequent, about 15 hour periods. And and the first time, it was a 156 milligrams per deciliter, which would be considered completely fine by most, you know, conventional physicians. And the second time was 346. It went up a 190 points in about 14 hours, which is shows the extreme dynamic variability of cholesterol, particularly given, you know, certain situations, low carbohydrate diets, exercise, fasting, things like that all have these significant impacts.
And we know that a lot of people just assume that cholesterol is relatively static and making decisions, sometimes lifelong decisions based on a single laboratory. That is how a lot of, you know, medicine has practiced. Right? And so faced with that, this lipidologist says something which I think is completely it shows a complete lack of insight into human biology, human history, human evolution. He says, who would ever resort to doing that extreme of fasting and exercise.
It's abnormal, and it's dangerous. Right? And so I I did eat for 37 hours, and I did an hour of cardio. Now can you imagine a scenario ever in the history history of humanity where something like that could have existed? Could you imagine, humans as hunters, you know, tracking animals for a day or 2 before they killed them, before they ate them, having to do some exercise to acquire their food?
I mean, this would have been the day to day to reality for significant portions of humanity for significant periods of time. Even even in recent thousands of years, that would have not been unusual. And then certainly if you go back into an evolutionary model where hunter gatherers were known to exist. I mean, this is, this is completely consistent with normal human physiology. And to think that we have a dynamic energy system that can respond to that in different ways.
Remember the whole thought behind the lipid energy model is that, things like fat is transported to meet demands. The liver liver transports fat to meet demands. And if you're fasted, you don't have a, you know, a glycogen filled liver, then those demands will be met with likely fat. And does he think that humans always had access to, you know, a grocery store? I mean, was he thinking that Uber Eats existed, you know, 20000, 50000 years ago perhaps?
And this is completely one of the problems, you know, with with medicine today, they have no insight into how the human body actually works. Believe it or not, as physicians, they don't understand. They all they understand is pharmacodynamics. Farming this, pharma that. This is where their education comes from.
This is where their thought comes from. They've lost the ability to think critically about these things. They have no curiosity. The only curiosity they have is what's the next drug gonna do. You know, it's very sad.
It's a very sad commentary. And so Pablo, perhaps if you, fasted and maybe exercised, you get rid of that double chin you're sporting there, buddy. So anyway, think about this. Think about the absurdity of that comment to say that it's dangerous. It's dangerous not to eat every 3 hours or something like that.
I mean, this is where we this is where we've gone as a physician saying that. You know, this is just insanity. Anyway, guys, let me know what you think. Do you think it's dangerous to go a whole 37 hours without eating? Do you think it's dangerous to do any kind of exercise without eating?
Do you think you'd have to just shove Twinkies in your mouth every 15 minutes and and just move around like a sloth? Perhaps that's a perhaps that's a way we're we're designed to live. Do you think anybody think that's realistic? Anyway, it's comical. Makes me laugh.
You know? Anyway, I'm off to LA for a couple days. We'll talk to you guys soon. Bye bye.
@Thekeksociety - DR. Kek
H O W MANY DOCTORS DO YOU THINK ARE DOING THIS? https://t.co/16E2chUvdH
Video Transcript AI Summary
A Michigan doctor was sentenced to 45 years for falsely diagnosing over 550 patients with cancer, leading to unnecessary treatments. Victims expressed anger and disappointment, with one family member recalling the doctor's false promises. The doctor admitted to misusing his talents for greed, earning millions from the fraudulent diagnoses. Patients described the experience as stressful and emotional.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We begin with that breaking headline today. A Michigan doctor sentenced being called a monster. A day of reckoning for the doctor who diagnosed 100 of patients with cancer when they did not have it. Outside the court, the tears and anger, he lied to so many patients, giving many of them extensive chemotherapy, which then made them sick. So many of those families today coming face to face with the doctor as he was sentenced to 45 years behind bars, and you're about to hear what the doctor said to those families.
ABC's Ron Claiborne leads us off.
Speaker 1: Judgment day for the doctor who caused so much pain. Victims of doctor Fareed Fata outside the courtroom where he was sentenced hand in hand then defiant.
Speaker 0: 45 years for the lives that he took. It just wasn't enough.
Speaker 1: In court, the 50 year old doctor breaking down saying, I misused my talents. Yes. And permitted this send to enter me because of power and greed. But those words, no comfort for Cheryl Blades.
Speaker 0: I could hear him talking to my mother because I went to every appointment. So I could hear him talking to her and promising her to save her.
Speaker 1: In all, Fata pleaded guilty to intentionally misdiagnosing more than 550 patients, often prescribing treatment for cancer that they did not have. He earned more than $17,000,000 as a result.
Speaker 0: Doctor Fata pounced on every opportunity to use a patient's body as a profit center.
Speaker 1: 1 of the patient's 53 year old Monica Flagg.
Speaker 0: Stressful. It was extremely emotional.
@MakisMD - William Makis MD
VIDEO: WE UNIFY Conference (Reclaiming Canada) - My Keynote Speech Few days ago a Canadian doctor was fined $44,784 for prescribing IVERMECTIN for COVID-19. ENOUGH. Dissolve the Colleges of Physicians and Surgeons & start criminal prosecutions @ABDanielleSmith#cdnpoli #ableg https://t.co/sXTN0fVQ6I
Video Transcript AI Summary
Colleges are accused of destroying medical ethics and the patient-doctor relationship. Danielle Smith, running for Premier of Alberta, spoke up for the unvaccinated, calling them persecuted. She suggested dissolving the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Alberta for change. Elect politicians willing to make major changes, not just tinker with healthcare. Support doctors who upheld the Hippocratic oath during the pandemic, as the healthcare system may collapse.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So the colleges were the biggest abusers. And I will say again, if there is anywhere where there should be criminal investigations and prosecutions, it should be at the colleges, the leadership of the colleges. Because they've done this to us. They they've basically they've destroyed bodily autonomy. They've destroyed informed consent.
They've destroyed every facet of medical ethics, established medical ethics that we've had since World War 2 that we've enjoyed. And they destroyed the patient doctor relationship. Danielle Smith is running to become the Premier of Alberta. And when she was elected as interim premier, in her first day she said, the unvaccinated were the most persecuted group that she's ever seen in her lifetime. And she was correct.
She had the guts to say it and she was absolutely 100% correct. And the media crucified her for it, but she said it. She said it publicly. And then the next thing that she has said that no other politician in Canada has ever even thought about, let alone said. She said that the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Alberta should be dissolved.
She said this. These are the kinds of politicians you need to elect cause we need major changes. The tinkering with, you know, tinkering with the health care system is not going to fix anything. We need major drastic changes and this is the only way is you're going to have to elect people who are willing to do the difficult work. The other way is to support the doctors who stood up for you during the pandemic.
And and look in your communities and and and find the doctors who are still faithful to their Hippocratic oath. Because there will come a time where our health care system will crumble and you're going to need them.
reSee.it AI Summary
I recently returned from Tokyo, where I witnessed a massive rally against the deployment of self-replicating RNA vaccines. Many in Japan view this as a significant threat, likening it to a third atomic bomb. The partnership behind this technology involves companies from the US, Australia, and Japan. Alarmingly, the CEO of the Japanese company has threatened legal action against anyone spreading dissent about the vaccine, raising concerns about freedom of speech and the potential risks of untested technology. I believe we must stand against this emerging tyranny.
@newstart_2024 - Camus
Dr. Robert Malone: "I just came back from Tokyo where they had a 30,000 person rally because they're about to deploy self-replicating RNA vaccines. Japan is being used as the guinea pigs for the world for this new technology. The Japanese people are calling this the third atomic bomb. This is being deployed in a cooperative agreement between a US company, Arcturus, a Canadian company, I'm sorry, a Australian company called CSL and a Japanese company. Now the CEO of the Japanese company recently gave a press conference. What did he say? He said anybody that is spreading misinformation, we're going to go after him legally, we're going to try to have them jailed. If you say anything against their self-replicating RNA vaccine technology that's never been rigorously tested, we don't know if it's going to infect other people. We don't know if it's going to spread. We know it's going to replicate. We don't know if it's going to get into the brain of the elders in Japan. But we do know that if we say anything about these concerns, the CEO is going to come after us and try to put us in jail. That's the new world order. That's what we're coming into. That's what they want to implement on us. They want to shut us down. They want to prevent us from speaking. They want to completely control the narrative and they want to be able to deploy psychological warfare on all of you to control you, to train you, to respond to the fear narratives about avian influenza and monkeypox and whatever it is they want to deploy next in order to control you, in order to teach you to shut up, sit down, stay in your homes, and do what you're told. Now I'm not okay with that, I don't think you're okay with that, and I hope that you join all of us in fighting this new tyranny."
Video Transcript AI Summary
A 30,000-person rally in Tokyo protested the deployment of self-replicating RNA vaccines, which some Japanese citizens are calling the "3rd atomic bomb." This deployment is a cooperative agreement between a US company (Arturis), an Australian company (CSL), and a Japanese company. The CEO of the Japanese company stated that anyone spreading misinformation about the vaccine will be pursued legally and potentially jailed. Concerns exist about the untested technology, including its potential to infect others, spread, replicate uncontrollably, and affect the brains of the elderly. The speaker believes this is an attempt to control the narrative, deploy psychological warfare, and suppress dissent, and urges listeners to fight this "new tyranny."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So here's what's going on. I just came back from Tokyo where they had a 30,000 person rally because they're about to deploy self replicating RNA vaccines. Japan is being used as the guinea pigs for the world for this new technology. The Japanese people are calling this the 3rd atomic bomb. This is being deployed in a cooperative agreement between a US company, Arturis, a Canadian I'm sorry.
A, Australian company called CSL, and a Japanese company. Now the CEO of the Japanese company recently gave a press conference. What did he say? He said, anybody that is spreading misinformation, we're gonna go after him legally. We're gonna try to have them jailed.
If you say anything against their self replicating RNA vaccine technology that's never been rigorously tested. We don't know if it's gonna infect other people. We don't know if it's gonna spread. We know it's gonna replicate. We don't know if it's gonna get into the brain of the elders in Japan.
But we do know that if we say anything about these concerns, the CEO is gonna come after us and try to put us in jail. That's the new world order. That's what we're coming into. That's what they wanna implement on us. They wanna shut us down.
They wanna prevent us from speaking. They wanna completely control the narrative, and they want to be able to deploy psychological warfare on all of you to control you, to train you, to respond to the fear narratives about avian influenza and monkeypox in whatever it is they wanna deploy next in order to control you, in order to teach you to shut up, sit down, stay in your homes, and do what you're told. Now I'm not okay with that. I don't think you're okay with that. And I hope that you join all of us in fighting this new tyranny.
@newstart_2024 - Camus
Credit: @RWMaloneMD
@JackStr42679640 - Jack Straw
Good Dr https://t.co/6pcKkG4iiU
Video Transcript AI Summary
I learned very little about the root causes of declining American health during my time at Stanford Medical School. For example, each additional serving of ultra-processed food increases early mortality by 18%, yet these foods constitute 67% of children's diets. I had no nutrition courses and discovered that 82% of independently funded studies show harm from processed food, while 93% of industry-sponsored studies report no harm. Additionally, 95% of those who developed the USDA Food Guidelines had conflicts of interest with the food industry. Every year, a billion pounds of synthetic pesticides are sprayed on food, with 99.99% of U.S. farmland affected. These chemicals are linked to serious health issues, including autism, ADHD, hormonal disruptions, various cancers, and infertility.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's not an overstatement to say that I learned virtually nothing at Stanford Medical School about the tens of thousands of scientific papers that elucidate these root causes of why American health is plummeting and how environmental factors are causing it. For instance, in medical school, I did not learn that for each additional serving of ultra processed food we eat, early mortality increases by 18%. This now makes up 67% of the foods our kids are eating. I took 0 nutrition courses in medical school. I didn't learn that 82% of independently funded studies show harm from processed food while 93% of industry sponsored studies reflect no harm.
In medical school, I didn't learn that 95% of the people who created the recent USDA Food Guidelines for America had significant conflicts of interest with the food industry. I did not learn that £1,000,000,000 of synthetic pesticides are being sprayed on our food every single year. 99 point 99% of the farmland in the United States is sprayed with synthetic pesticides, many from China and Germany. And these invisible, tasteless chemicals are strongly linked to autism, ADHD, sex hormone disruption, thyroid disease, sperm dysfunction, Alzheimer's, dementia, birth defects, cancer, obesity, liver dysfunction, just liver dysfunction, female infertility, and more.
@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes
This is Ali Haider, he is a cardiologist in America “So here’s the state of American Healthcare today” Normally I would summarize but you need to hear this directly from him The US Healthcare system is broken so much worse than we realize. We need more doctors speaking out. https://t.co/g5DQI5Oylb
Video Transcript AI Summary
The current state of American healthcare involves a lengthy process for getting insurance approval for necessary procedures. A cardiologist submitted a request for a patient’s procedure, but it was denied, requiring additional information. After resubmitting data, the insurance company still denied the request, necessitating a peer-to-peer review. This involved scheduling a phone call with an insurance-employed doctor, which took nearly two weeks of back-and-forth communication and long hold times. Ultimately, despite all efforts, the procedure is likely to be denied again.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So here's the state of American health care today. I'm a cardiologist, and a patient was referred to me for a cardiology procedure because, well, they need the procedure. Now before we can schedule it, we have to get approval from the insurance company, which often requires a prior authorization. So for that, we submit all the information to the insurance company and await their decision whether it's approved. Of course, as it frequently happens, it was not approved, and they're requesting more information.
So we submit more data. Several days later, they come back and say, nope, still not approved. So they are requiring a peer to peer, which means that I get on a phone call with a doctor who's employed by the insurance company. So then we have to schedule the peer to peer. So my staff gets on the phone, day 1, day 2, day 3, an hour plus on hold each time until they finally get through.
And then they schedule a phone call, which is scheduled at the end of the week. They give you the time, and I gotta carve out time in my schedule in the middle of the day so I can speak to this doctor. Mind you, this process is now taking almost 2 weeks.
Speaker 1: And at the end of the day,
Speaker 0: it's probably still gonna be denied.
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe the notion that the sun causes cancer is absurd. The sun is essential for life and offers numerous health benefits, including stroke and cancer prevention, improved mood, and better bone health. The real issues arise from harmful practices like using toxic sunscreens and consuming processed foods, which contribute to poor metabolic health. We face many cancer-causing substances in our environment, but the sun itself is not the enemy. It's crucial to recognize the true sources of health problems rather than scapegoating sunlight.
@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith
"The Idea That The Sun Is Giving You Cancer Is The Most Asinine, Insane, Gaslighting, Ridiculous Statement On Earth." --Dr Rimka "The Sun Is A Nutrient. It Is Not Out To Kill You." "It Makes All Life Exist. It Charges Everything. We Are Alive Because Of The Power Of The Sun." The Benefits Of The Sun For Optimal Health: Stroke Prevention Cancer Prevention Heart Attack Prevention Bone Health Immune System Health Depression Prevention Natural Appetite Suppressant Natural Blood Sugar/Insulin Control Mood Enhancer Hair Keratin Production Naturally Lowers Blood Pressure Optimal Libido & Hormone Production Muscle Health & Injury Prevention Eyesight Health The sun—the very source of life—isn't the problem. It’s what you’re doing under it that compromises your metabolic health: *⃣ Slathering on toxic sunscreens loaded with carcinogens, then baking them into your skin with UV light. *⃣ Eating processed junk foods full of rancid seed oils, sugars & artificial additives that fuel oxidative stress. *⃣ Excessive sugar intake by way of processed sugars, corn syrup & juice adds to the toxic load. We’re constantly bombarded with cancer-causing substances: *⃣ Toxic carpets, vinyl flooring & furniture releasing harmful VOCs. *⃣ Body products & room freshening fragrances & candles filled with endocrine disruptors. *⃣ Ultra-processed foods engineered for profit, not health. The sun is an easy scapegoat. it’s not the sun that’s dangerous. 👇Vitamin D Deficiency & Chronic Disease👇 https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5440113/ 👇Melanoma Is Not Caused By Sunlight👇 https://ec.europa.eu/health/scientific_committees/scheer/docs/sunbeds_co255a_en.pdf 👇Sunscreen Carcinogen Ingredients👇 https://www.ewg.org/sunscreen/report/the-trouble-with-sunscreen-chemicals/#:~:text=Octinoxate%20is%20a%20non%2Dmineral%20UV%20filter.%20It,times%20above%20the%20proposed%20FDA%20safety%20threshold Speaker: Dr Stephanie Rimka @TheRealDrRimka
Video Transcript AI Summary
People get energy from sunlight, and those in the sun eat less food. Children should be outside in the sun without shirts, running barefoot on the grass to get electrons, which is free energy. The electron transfer chain in mitochondria is powered by the sun.
The idea that the sun causes cancer is false. The sun is a nutrient that makes all life exist and charges everything. Sunscreen contains carcinogenic chemicals. The speaker, age 51, has never used sunscreen, has had no work done, eats meat, and drives a convertible to maximize sun exposure because it makes them younger. The government is lying. Do the opposite of what the government says.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We make energy from sunlight. People who are in the sun eat less food. Let your kids be outside in the sun. Take their shirts off. Let them run around barefoot on the grass.
You know what you get from the ground? You get electrons. The same thing. It's straight free energy. What runs through a mitochondria that makes all the ATP the electron transfer chain it's not a fat acid train it's not a carbohydrate train protein if the sun is a nutrient it is not out to kill you The idea that the sun is giving you cancer is the most asinine, insane gaslighting, ridiculous statement on earth.
It makes all life exist. It charges everything. We are alive because of the power of the sun yet you want to tell people to slather on carcinogenic chemicals, bake it into their skin with the suns and say, oh, that's what's aging you. I'm 51 years old. I've never used sunscreen.
I don't have anything done to my face. I eat a ton of meat. I drive a convertible. I want as much as I possibly can get. You know, because it makes me younger.
They're lying to you. They've lied about almost everything. Do the opposite of what the government says.
Vitamin D and Chronic Diseases
Vitamin D is one of the essential nutrients to sustain the human health. As a member of the steroid hormone family, it has a classic role in regulating metabolism of calcium and a non-classic role in affecting cell proliferation and differentiation. ...
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
The trouble with ingredients in sunscreens | EWG's Guide to Sunscreens
Active ingredients in sunscreens come in two forms, mineral and chemical filters. Each uses a different mechanism for protecting skin and maintaining stability in sunlight. Each may pose hazards to human health. The most common sunscreens on the market contain chemical filters. These products typically include a combination of two to six of these active ingredients: oxybenzone, avobenzone, octisalate, octocrylene, homosalate and octinoxate. Mineral sunscreens use zinc oxide and/or titanium dioxide. A handful of products combine zinc oxide with chemical filters.
ewg.org
@frogNscorpion - Into the Memory Hole
Your anecdotes mean nothing. UK: 1/3 of doctors are foreign and make up over 60% of all sexual assault on patients 72% of them lose their licenses to malpractice. https://t.co/TauhaQaI3j
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe animal fats, particularly butter, are superfoods that can significantly benefit gut health. Butter is rich in butyric acid, a nutrient crucial for healing conditions like IBS and Crohn's disease. It reduces inflammation, inhibits harmful bacteria, and promotes beneficial bacteria growth. Beyond gut health, butyric acid enhances insulin sensitivity, supports cardiovascular health, boosts energy production, and aids digestion. Its protective role extends to various aspects of overall health, making butter a valuable addition to our diets.
@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith
Animal Fats Are Superfoods...Butter Is Especially Healthy For Your Gut! Butter Contains A Special Nutrient That Heals IBS & Crohn's Disease. Butyric Acid Is Made In The GI Tract, But Is Deficient In Those With Digestive Issues. Butter Is A Butyric Acid Powerhouse For Healing. Butyric Acid is formed in & found in our colons, and supports the health & healing of cells in the small & large intestine. It’s also the favored source of fuel for the cells lining the interior of the large intestine. Butyric Acid accounts for 83% of the short chain fatty acids in the colon. The butyric acid found in butter & ghee have these gut healing benefits: *⃣ Reduces inflammation of the gastrointestinal tract which is the root cause of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. *⃣ Inhibits the growth of unwanted bacteria in the gut & interferes with the growth of highly toxic bacteria. *⃣ Encourages the growth of beneficial bacteria like Bifidobacterium. *⃣ Supports healthy bowel function & regulates abnormal bowel movements. *⃣ Helps adjust water & electrolyte concentration in the intestinal tract. *⃣ Supports the health endothelial lining of the intestinal mucosa & normal bowel function in inflammatory bowel conditions. On top of this, butyric acid production in the gut delivers a host of remarkable benefits that extend far beyond digestive health: *⃣ Increases insulin sensitivity for T2D prevention. *⃣ Supports healthy cholesterol & is cardiovascular protective. *⃣ Increases cellular energy production & efficiency of energy utilization. *⃣ Protects the liver & promotes bile release for digestion. *⃣ Promotes satiety signals & lowers hunger levels. *⃣ Increases thermogenesis in the body. 👇Protective Role Of Butyric Acid👇 https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9730524/ 👇Butyric Acid For Inflammatory Bowel Disease👇 https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4027835/ 👇Health Benefits Of Ghee👇 https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10789628/ Speaker: @paulsaladinomd
Video Transcript AI Summary
Butter is a health food full of nutrients beneficial for humans. A recent study showed that patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) were given 300 milligrams of butyrate a day. Butyric acid is found in butter. Over twelve weeks, their IBS symptoms went down significantly. One tablespoon of butter contains 300 milligrams of butyrate. Therefore, one tablespoon of butter a day could significantly improve your gut health, whether you have IBS or not.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Butter is a health food for your gut. Check this out. I think butter is a health food in general. It's a healthy animal fat full of so many nutrients that are beneficial for humans. And there was a recent study where patients with irritable bowel syndrome, IBS, were given three hundred milligrams of butyrate.
Sounds like butter, right? Butyric acid is found in butter. Patients were given three hundred milligrams of butyrate a day, and over twelve weeks, their IBS symptoms went down significantly. How much butter would you have to eat to get three hundred milligrams of butyrate? One tablespoon.
One tablespoon of butter a day could significantly improve your gut health, whether you have IBS or not. I've always felt like butter is a health food, and now we know that butter is even healthier for your gut.
Protective role of butyrate in obesity and diabetes: New insights
Studies in human microbiota dysbiosis have shown that short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) like propionate, acetate, and particularly butyrate, positively affect energy homeostasis, behavior, and inflammation. This positive effect can be demonstrated in ...
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Butyric acid in irritable bowel syndrome
Butyric acid (butanoic acid) belongs to a group of short-chain fatty acids and is thought to play several beneficial roles in the gastrointestinal tract. Butyric anion is easily absorbed by enteric cells and used as a main source of energy. ...
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Health benefits of ghee: Review of Ayurveda and modern science perspectives
The scientific view on dairy fats is undergoing a change. While at one time they were associated with negative health effects, recent scientific research has provided new insights into the functional benefits of dairy fats and their fatty acids. ...
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
reSee.it AI Summary
I’ve been exploring the alarming phenomenon of COVID vaccine shedding, where unvaccinated individuals report strange symptoms after being near vaccinated people. My investigation, alongside @MidwesternDoc, revealed consistent patterns, including abnormal menstrual bleeding and other health issues. Peer-reviewed studies support these findings, suggesting that exosomes may play a role in transmitting the spike protein. Despite skepticism and censorship, the evidence is compelling. Many affected individuals feel ignored, raising critical questions about vaccine safety and informed consent.
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
The Shocking Truth About COVID Vaccine Shedding The most puzzling part of the COVID injection is its ability to “shed” and harm people who never even got the shot. @MidwesternDoc spent a year investigating over 1,500 of these reports. What emerged is one of the most alarming patterns of the pandemic. 🧵 THREAD
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
Everyone’s talking about shedding, but almost no one knows what it really is. Shortly after the COVID vaccine rollout, thousands of unvaccinated people started reporting strange symptoms—oftentimes right after being near someone recently vaccinated. They hadn’t gotten the shot. Yet they were sick. And the symptoms were eerily consistent.
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
Shedding isn’t just some blog theory. It’s backed by peer-reviewed research that was carefully examined by other scientists before being published. https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/what-weve-learned-from-a-year-of
What We've Learned from a Year of Vaccine Shedding Data
Numerous data sources now corroborate that the COVID vaccines shed in a consistent and replicable manner
midwesterndoctor.com
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
The most common shedding symptom might surprise you—abnormal menstrual bleeding. It was even happening to women long past menopause and to young girls who hadn’t had their first period. Doctors brushed it off. Social media mocked them for asking questions. But the patterns were too strong to ignore. Whatever was happening to these women was very, very real.
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
Other common symptoms reported by unvaccinated people included: • Flu-like illness • Headaches • Skin rashes • Nosebleeds • Fatigue • Sinus problems • Hair loss • Tinnitus • Shingles • Swollen lymph nodes
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
Some said they could even smell something strange—like a metallic, chemical odor—when near someone recently vaccinated for COVID. https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/what-weve-learned-from-a-year-of
What We've Learned from a Year of Vaccine Shedding Data
Numerous data sources now corroborate that the COVID vaccines shed in a consistent and replicable manner
midwesterndoctor.com
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
It wasn’t just random symptoms. There were patterns. People consistently got sick after being near vaccinated coworkers, family members, or crowds. And now @PierreKory and @MidwesternDoc have analyzed more than 1,500 detailed reports of suspected COVID vaccine shedding cases.
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
So, why is this happening? The theories vary, but the most likely explanation is exosomes—tiny particles the body uses to send messages between cells. After vaccination, the spike protein may be packaged inside exosomes. They’re then exhaled and secreted in sweat. And that’s how they spread.
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
In 2023, a peer-reviewed study found something wild: Unvaccinated children of vaccinated parents were developing antibodies to the spike protein without ever getting COVID or the vaccine. This implies something was transmitted from parent to child. What else could possibly explain it? Another clue: Pfizer's own trial protocol warned about “environmental exposure” from skin contact or inhalation. And the FDA classifies mRNA injections as gene therapy—where shedding is a well-known concern.
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
@PierreKory @MidwesternDoc And yes, the 2023 peer-reviewed study even went there—sexual shedding. A lot of people were afraid to talk about it, but the research confirmed what many suspected. People were getting sick after being intimate with vaccinated partners. https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/what-weve-learned-from-a-year-of
What We've Learned from a Year of Vaccine Shedding Data
Numerous data sources now corroborate that the COVID vaccines shed in a consistent and replicable manner
midwesterndoctor.com
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
@PierreKory @MidwesternDoc Despite all of this, we were told COVID-19 vaccine shedding was “impossible.” People were being mocked and censored just for asking questions about it. Nothing about this was scientific, yet we were told over and over again to “trust the science.”
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
@PierreKory @MidwesternDoc @MidwesternDoc has pointed to possible treatments. Things like anti-inflammatories, detox protocols, and specific supplements seem to help. Read more on that below. https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/what-weve-learned-from-a-year-of
What We've Learned from a Year of Vaccine Shedding Data
Numerous data sources now corroborate that the COVID vaccines shed in a consistent and replicable manner
midwesterndoctor.com
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
@PierreKory @MidwesternDoc Meanwhile, researchers actually found that women who were never vaccinated or infected experienced dramatic menstrual changes after exposure. Disturbingly, one study found that 92% of women reported noticeable disruptions to their menstrual cycle—many within 3 days of exposure.
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
And sadly, it didn’t just stop at menstrual changes. Some women developed autoimmunity, reactivated viruses like shingles or Epstein-Barr, or even reported life-threatening conditions like blood clots, heart issues, and neurological flare-ups. Unfortunately, these weren’t isolated incidents.
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
Many of the most sensitive women had pre-existing issues like mold toxicity, fibromyalgia, or previous vaccine injuries. Even pets—cats, dogs, parrots—were affected! One woman said she had to stop visiting her parents after every trip left her bedridden. Another said, “I walked into church, and the second I sat down, I felt it. The same headache, same body ache, same smell. Every time.” A massage therapist said she could no longer work on vaccinated clients without getting sick herself.
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
I know what you’re thinking. This didn’t happen to you or to someone you know. It sounds almost unbelievable. You’re right. Most people never feel a thing. But for a vulnerable subset of the population, the impacts have been devastating—and they’ve been gaslighted and ignored at every turn. Just because we don’t experience something or know someone who has experienced it doesn’t mean it’s not happening.
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
@PierreKory @MidwesternDoc If shedding is real—and the evidence now suggests it is—then we need to ask important questions before it’s too late. Should mRNA vaccines even be allowed on the market if they can affect people who never gave consent?
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
@PierreKory @MidwesternDoc That’s what makes this so critical. Shedding means it’s not just about “personal choice.” The unvaccinated may still be impacted—sometimes severely. And yet… we’ve been given no warning. There’s no informed consent. And as always, there’s no accountability.
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
It’s one of the darkest truths of the COVID pandemic. We were told the vaccines would stay in your arm, and that anyone who said otherwise was a conspiracy theorist. Shedding wasn’t some wild internet myth. It was real. And while people were getting silenced, mocked, and banned for bringing it up, the truth was sitting in the science the entire time. They weren’t just wrong—they were gaslighting us, hard.
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
@PierreKory @MidwesternDoc We were told to get vaccinated to protect others. That it wasn’t a “personal choice.” It was for the greater good. And now everything feels upside down. We’re supposed to get vaccinated even though it can harm others? And they don’t get a choice? Make it make sense.
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
The evidence for shedding is no longer a conspiracy theory. It’s well-documented. It’s measurable. And it’s happening to real people. All mRNA injections must be held to the same safety standards as any other gene therapy. Until then, we’re all part of an uncontrolled experiment. I know I didn’t consent to participate. Did you?
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
If you’ve experienced strange symptoms after being around COVID vaccinated individuals, you're not crazy—and you’re not alone. Thousands of people have shared their stories with @PierreKory and @MidwesternDoc. Their patterns are striking. Their suffering is real. And their voices deserve to be heard.
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
@PierreKory @MidwesternDoc Thanks for reading! This information was based on a report originally published by @MidwesternDoc. Key details were been streamlined and editorialized for clarity and impact. Read the original report below. https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/what-weve-learned-from-a-year-of
What We've Learned from a Year of Vaccine Shedding Data
Numerous data sources now corroborate that the COVID vaccines shed in a consistent and replicable manner
midwesterndoctor.com
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
@PierreKory @MidwesternDoc For a full deep dive into COVID vaccines and more, don’t miss these other eye-opening articles by @MidwesternDoc: Yale Just Proved COVID Vaccine Injury Exists and Spike Production Persists for Years Inside The Body https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/yale-proved-covid-vax-injury-exists
Yale Just Proved COVID Vaccine Injury Exists and Spike Production Persists for Years Inside The Body
Reviewing the consequences of the reckless steps used to make the vaccines and the immunological damage which followed
midwesterndoctor.com
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
@PierreKory @MidwesternDoc DMSO is a Miraculous Therapy for Chronic Pain and Musculoskeletal Injuries https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/dmso-is-a-miraculous-therapy-for
DMSO is a Miraculous Therapy for Chronic Pain and Musculoskeletal Injuries
The decades of evidence DMSO revolutionizes the practice of medicine
midwesterndoctor.com
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
@PierreKory @MidwesternDoc How Do Vaccines Cause Autism? https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/how-do-vaccines-cause-autism
How Do Vaccines Cause Autism?
Past discoveries that can help us understand the current wave of neurological spike protein injuries.
midwesterndoctor.com
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
@PierreKory @MidwesternDoc While you’re at it, give @MidwesternDoc a follow. No one brings more research, clinical insight, or historical context when it comes to exposing the health myths we’ve all been fed. This is easily one of the most valuable accounts you’ll ever follow. --> @MidwesternDoc https://t.co/yeGG5UQVtt
@XPHOENIXDRAGON - 𝐏𝐇𝐎𝐄𝐍𝐈𝐗⚜️𝐃𝐑𝐀𝐆𝐎𝐍
💥 Nurses MIND BLOWING SPEECH! Must Hear - Sen. Ron Johnson. Nurse Nicole Sirotek. https://t.co/B3aRD3HHuE
Video Transcript AI Summary
Nicole Zerotech, registered nurse with critical care and flight nurse experience and a master's biochemist, says: "I didn't see a single patient died of COVID. I've seen substantial number of patients die of negligence. And the handicapping of medical professionals doing their job." On New York front lines, she cites: "Two days ago, I flew out my first 10 year old with a heart attack... And I'm like, well, he was just vaccinated yesterday. It is very much possible." She warns vaccine injuries are misattributed to anxiety or neuropathy to avoid reimbursement: "if they put down that it was a vaccine injury... they actually won't get reimbursed. It gets labeled as anxiety or neuropathy or Guillain Barre syndrome when in actuality, it's very realistically a vaccine injury." She founded American Frontline Nurses and traveled to South America, India, and South Africa; "nowhere in those countries and developing nations do I see these issues that we see here in The United States." She claims U.S. health care is "substandard third world nation health care" and that "you are better off in South America in a field hospital than you are in level one trauma designer hospitals in The United States." She reports nurses' accounts of inadequate care: "I've had patients that haven't been bathed, haven't been fed, haven't been given water, haven't been turned." "And if you ask me, this isn't a hospital. This is a concentration camp. That's right. Absolutely it is."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Thank you, senator. My name is Nicole Zerotech. I'm a registered nurse. I've been a registered nurse for over a decade. My specialty is critical care, a flight nurse that can manage ventilators.
And I'm actually a master's prepared biochemist, I have worked extensively with the HIV virus tracking, genetic mutations. I didn't see a single patient died of COVID. I've seen substantial number of patients die of negligence. And the handicapping of medical professionals doing their job, many of them are not dying from COVID. When I was on the front lines of New York
Speaker 1: I know we're gonna have a ton of people die, but these people aren't dying from COVID. Nobody is listening. They don't care what is happening to these people. They don't. I'm literally coming here every day and watching them kill them.
I'll know what's happening.
Speaker 0: They all agree with me, and they all just shake their heads. And I'm like, am I the only one who is not a sociopath? Two days ago, I flew out my first 10 year old with a heart attack and I had to fight the doctor in the ER because he's like 10 year olds don't have heart attacks. And I argued back and forth for thirty minutes to force his hand to get an EKG to find out that he had almost a complete STEMI which is ST elevated myocardial infarction. And he's like, well, that's not possible.
And I'm like, well, he was just vaccinated yesterday. It is very much possible. At any given time, people are getting a hold of me and the nurse advocates at American Frontline Nurses to help advocate because as you've seen, there is victim shaming. Oh, it's anxiety. Oh, it's this.
But in actuality, if they put down that it was a vaccine injury, the physician, the corporation, the hospital, the clinic, they actually won't get reimbursed. It gets labeled as anxiety or neuropathy or Guillain Barre syndrome when in actuality, it's very realistically a vaccine injury. I founded American Frontline Nurses. I've traveled extensively to South America, India, and South Africa working in hot zones, stopping the spread of the virus, and working with early intervention. And nowhere in those countries and developing nations do I see these issues that we see here in The United States.
Our level of health care has been deteriorated to substandard third world nation health care whereas I tell people you are better off in South America in a field hospital than you are in level one trauma designer hospitals in The United States. As nurses, we are getting reports across the country from our American frontline nurses. They're on a ventilator. They're not getting basic standards of care. I've had patients that haven't been bathed, haven't been fed, haven't been given water, haven't been turned.
And if you ask me, this isn't a hospital. This is a concentration camp. That's right. Absolutely it is.
@Jasper_Truth - Jasper Truth 🇺🇸
Important guidance from Patriot Nurse: WHAT YOU SHOULD AVOID SAYING TO A DOCTOR. PatrioticNurse https://t.co/JjbF05mStP
Video Transcript AI Summary
Patriot Nurse discusses what you should never say to a doctor or healthcare provider and which topics require careful handling when interacting with the medical system. She frames these issues within concerns about abuse and corruption in health care, and emphasizes the power imbalance between patients and licensed professionals in the United States, where mandatory reporting creates a fear-based compliance system.
Key points she makes:
- Mandatory reporting and tattletaling: Health care providers with licenses operate under mandatory reporting, creating a system where “if you see something, say something” can pressure professionals to report patients. This contributes to a power disparity at vulnerable moments for patients. Providers are not gods, and they are human and flawed.
- Fifth Amendment-like mindset: Patients should apply a mental filter similar to exercising a fifth amendment right—do not incriminate yourself; you should not feel obligated to disclose information beyond what benefits you.
- Mental health history questions: Asking about a history of mental illness can label patients. If a patient has remitted or recovered, there may be little need to disclose, though many clinicians emphasize the need for a good history and physical. A patient has sovereignty to share information at their discretion, and real nurses protect patient confidentiality and trust.
- Firearms and weapons questions: The American Academy of Pediatrics and the American Medical Association advocate screenings for firearms in the home. Patriot Nurse argues these are political organizations and cautions that information about weapons in the home can trigger mandatory reporting in ways that could lead to child protective actions. She says you are not required to fill out such paperwork, you can leave it blank, strike through, or refuse; if faced with tech prompts, you can request a hard copy and refuse to answer. Do not incriminate yourself, and do not feel compelled to answer what you do not want to disclose.
- Parental dynamics and CPS risk: Interactions in the doctor’s office can influence family court involvement and CPS referrals. Family court is described as a major path for government control over children. Be cautious with statements in front of doctors about parenting, as it can lead to CPS involvement.
- Postpartum and pregnancy-related screenings: She stresses the vulnerability of pregnant and postpartum women and notes a trend to refer to pregnant women as “pregnant people.” She warns that postpartum depression screenings can lead to CPS involvement if a woman answers in a way that triggers concern. She argues honesty can be penalized and emphasizes practical support from friends and family (help with meals, chores, errands) and non-drug interventions such as nutritional and hormonal considerations. She calls CPS involvement “evil” when women seek help and are judged by skewed screening results.
- “Whatever you think is best” is dangerous: She warns against deferring decisions to clinicians, urging patients to ask questions and delay decisions if there is no immediate emergency. She stresses informed consent and the importance of thinking through options before acting, especially when a patient is ill or medicated.
- Self-advocacy and preparation: No one will care for you or your family as much as you do. The more you know, the more you can converse as an equal with healthcare providers, reducing power imbalances. She promotes her online courses (four- and seven-hour medical prep) to build knowledge, reading ability, and self-advocacy, potentially avoiding unnecessary care and enabling better conversations if care is needed.
- Caution about political biases in medicine: She references Charlie Kirk’s assassination and notes that some medical professionals, despite credentials, may hold hostile views toward conservatives; she urges care providers to align with your values when possible and to consider location and insurance limitations.
- Final encouragement: Reiterate your fifth amendment rights, stay vigilant, and share the information with others who might benefit. She signs off as Patriot Nurse, inviting viewers to use the information to shield themselves and their families from what she describes as a potentially malevolent alliance between government and health care informers.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hey folks, it's Patriot Nurse. What should you NEVER say to a doctor who is taking care of you? Anything you should avoid in particular when visiting a hospital or an office where medical providers are looking at you? Yes. There are definite things that you should avoid saying, and there are definite subject matters that you should broach very carefully when interacting with the medical industrial complex.
We're gonna talk about this today because there are major issues that are not getting talked about, and the potential for abuse and corruption by health care professionals is rampant, and we've seen it recently. We're gonna unpack these issues today. Let's get started. So the first thing that we have to understand before we go over these do not touch areas, these subject matters, these things that you should never say to a physician or healthcare provider. You have to understand that in The United States, most healthcare providers are under a mantle of obligation called mandatory reporting, meaning that effectively if you see something, say something.
Or if you think you might have possibly seen something potentially, then say something. That's effectively the bearing that is being put on people who have licenses as health care providers. So what this creates is effectively a fear compliance system by the government, by the state boards, local boards, to force people into tattletelling on their patients. This is something that's particularly disturbing because there's a major disparity in power with a patient coming to a healthcare provider seeking care at their most vulnerable times. There's no way that that patient can defend themselves against them for the most part.
And because of the state of affairs, health care providers with licenses after their name and, you know, nice pretty starched white coats, they are looked at in many cases as effectively emissaries of god in our culture. That a doctor would never lie. A doctor would never falsify information. A doctor would never utilize a patient's answers to enforce a political position or a point. So all of these things we know are are obviously not true, that physicians are not God, that health care providers are human beings and they are flawed, and in many cases, they are driven by the same basal instincts that really have caused a lot of people to end up on the foul end of government enforcement over the years.
So other things we're gonna discuss, this is a mandatory pre req that you understand that in the same way that you would view yourself interacting with law enforcement as having a fifth amendment right to not say anything unless you incriminate yourself. You really need to apply that same mental filter whenever you are going and interacting with healthcare professionals really in any case. Now on one hand, I recognize that the healthcare professionals who are listening to this right now, many of them are probably nodding their heads like yep, yep, yep, and then some of them are probably like Patriot nurse, how could you possibly disincentivize patients from reporting what's really on their hearts and what they're really struggling with? Listen, man. I'm here for my people.
I'm here for my followers, my subscribers, and my patients. And they have rights, particularly rights to protect them against goons and thugs who have letters after their name, who happen to be government agents and political hacks with licenses. So that's where I'm holding. I care about people having their rights protected, including rights protected from the medical industrial complex incestuously aligned with the government. So the first thing that you should be very aware of is any type of mental health questions, any type of questionnaire that would ask you if you've had a history of, for instance, mental illness, etc.
Now on one hand, if you are seeking care specifically from a licensed therapist or someone who you feel confidence is going to help you get onto a path of better mental well-being, then that definitely is a need to know place. But be aware that if you are going into the medical system and you're receiving care and you check for instance that you have a history of depression or you have a history of bipolar disorder, you have a history of x y and z, then what you're doing is labeling yourself. And in many cases, if for instance that you have seen remission or you have seen healing from these areas, there is no need to really in most cases, there's no need to tattle on yourself. Now, again, I recognize that this is flying in the face of what a lot of the medical professionals who are alongside me would say, so we need a good history and physical, we need a good assessment. You know, that good assessment is the basis.
Listen, a patient has the right to tell you what they want to tell you. You don't have a right to force people to comply with extracting out their information. A patient has the right, they have sovereignty, to give you the information about themselves that they wish, at the time that they wish, and only insofar as it benefits them. And if that patient has made the determination it doesn't benefit them, then they are not obligated to divulge sensitive parts of their past. So just a statement there of patients' rights advocates, that's what nurses do.
That's what real nurses do. Real nurses do not abuse patient confidentiality and abuse patient trust. So as we've talked about the mental health part of things, let's also segue into another one, and this is number two. This is firearms and weapons related things. Two of the organizations that I despise the most in The United States have decided to advocate that their members conduct screenings for their patients' entry assessments on whether or not firearms are in the house.
The American Academy of Pediatrics is one of them, and the American Medical Association is another. These are political hacks. These are these are political organizations masquerading as medical advocacy groups. But make no mistake, these people in particular, the American Academy of Pediatrics has really been a huge proponent of leftist policies, including gender transitioning and abusive mutilation of children. And, of course, you know, that's okay.
But asking a person how many firearms is in the house, you know, this this is something that we should really advocate for as well in their mind. The problem is this. When you've got this type of information, particularly in pediatrics admission assessments, the admission assessment is gathering information to determine A, if there is a risk, a threat to the child, but the other thing is depending on who it is who is seeing you, if they determine that there are firearms in the home and they also determine that for whatever reason the kid says that they're sad or that they don't get along with people at school or for instance that mommy and daddy discipline them in corporal punishment ways that are commensurate with scriptural tenants, I would might add, that they start to connect these things in their mind. Because remember, they're mandatory reporters. Right?
Right? If you see something, say something. If you think there's a possibility for something. So be very wary about what it is that you respond to, and in fact, there is no need to know. They do not need to know what weapons are in the house.
They do not need to know what firearms in the house. You are not required to fill paperwork out. You can leave it blank. You can skip it. You can strike through it.
You don't have to answer any of this. If they shove a tablet in your face when you go to the office or they give you one of those little says have this filled out before your visit, you still don't have to fill it out. And if they say, like like, for instance, if it gives you an error code, like, oh, like, you have to fill this out. Like, none shall pass without filling it out. If it gives you one of those error codes, then just show up early, like ten, fifteen minutes early to your appointment.
Say, listen, like, I'm having some tech issues. I'm probably gonna need a hard copy here or something else, and just refuse to answer that. You do not have to incriminate yourself. You do not have to give any information over any health care provider, really any person for any reason whatsoever that you don't feel comfortable doing. So don't do it.
The third is specifically related to issues of parental dynamics in the house. And when it comes to parental dynamics, this can be not just for, for instance, pediatric visits, but also for really any type of interaction, particularly where family court is involved. And so family court, for those of you who've had the unfortunate experience of interacting with it, family court is effectively the single biggest way where the government takes mandatory custody control and otherwise otherwise purview over children. That is the biggest method, I think, overall for the transfer of power away from parents and into the state when it comes to the raising of children is family court systems. So if you can avoid family court by not getting divorced, then that would be a good thing.
But also realize that whenever these dynamics show up, particularly in doctor's offices, it, in many cases, can end up lending itself to CPS calls. CPS is more likely to get involved in child protective services, they are more likely to get involved in homes that are broken. So just be aware of how it is that you interact and what you say in front of doctors, particularly their children involved. The fourth thing that I want to discuss is specifically postpartum related issues to women who have given birth and also in pregnancy. Now, if you'll notice here, I have specifically chosen the biologically correct, factually accurate characterization of pregnant women.
Because right now, one of the little trendy things that ACOG and the American Academy Nurse Midwives this trend right now is to call pregnant women pregnant people. Because apparently, like, a tenth of a thousandth of a percent of transgender people decide that they wanna get knocked up later with whatever percentage, you know, in it. None of this is relevant. Right? The reality is that a pregnant woman is in a specific and vulnerable position, and we should advocate for pregnant women and their rights.
Now what happens is when women get shoved into these particular the hospital model of pregnancy care and of delivery, they are put through a matrix of questions and really this gauntlet of things that they have to answer. And in particular, one of the things that you'll notice is that around the time of the third trimester and also postpartum, she will be given a question series to screen for postpartum depression. Now be very careful about this. On one hand, I think it's fair to say as a woman who has worked with other women in labor and delivery, I have also worked as a psych nurse, inpatient psychiatric, and I have also worked in postpartum care. So I've seen the whole gambit of this.
One of the things that we need to be aware of is that there are certain, for instance, contributing factors to postpartum depression in women, and they should not be ignored. They should be mitigated, and they should be worked with appropriately in a caring manner and in an empathetic manner. But what happens is when women are given these screenings, these little numbers to add up, if you answer these questions incorrectly in your doctor's office, and you happen to have some activist nurse who's looking at it, or an activist doctor or a physician who's some left ist activist who really loves to get CPS involved in things, if a woman gives the wrong answer on her postpartum depression screening form, she could potentially look at a CPS call. This is awful. This is evil.
Because when it comes right down to it, that woman is extremely vulnerable if she is experiencing postpartum depression. She's in a very vulnerable position. And what happens is honesty is penalized. And whereas a woman, for instance, let's say that she was just struggling with baby blues or she's just having a really hard time because she has no effective try because the West has said, alright, women, you've cranked out babies. Get back to work in six weeks and just, you know, shove all of your maternal hormones down.
Good luck trying to convalesce from all that. Your pelvic floor is probably gonna suck for about two years, but you'll get over it. This is what we expect women to go through with no emotional support and then wonder why they're depressed and then send a c p s call to take their children whenever they actually reach out for help. It's abominable. It's deplorable.
So if you are a woman or you know a woman, you know someone who is in her later part of pregnancy and postpartum, I would just recommend to you friends that the best thing that you could do is to reach out and actually help. And not like, oh, I'll come over and hold the baby, but make food, do laundry, fold laundry, be willing to run errands, grocery haul, anything that you can do to practically help. Because when it comes right down to it, there are things that can, pharmaceutically, mitigate postpartum depression, but so much of this is hormonal, it is nutritional, and it is a lack of tribal support. And the last thing that a woman needs who is suffering from all of the aforementioned in deficit, the last thing that she needs is some agent of government knocking on her door threatening to take her baby and her other children away. It's evil, evil things.
And it happens. Why? Because she honestly answers questions given to her by someone she trusts with letters after their name. Another thing that you should avoid saying like the plague is whatever you think is best. Oh, friends, let me tell you.
Whatever you think is best is like carte blanche for medical abuse. When you go into a hospital and I've made videos about this particular the hospital dark side. I'll put a link to that video up here. When you go into a hospital, unfortunately, because of the way things are, you really have to suspect that you are going to be on the defense, that people are going to be trying to intervene. They're gonna be trying to give you things.
They might be screwing up your medication. They might be not giving your family members the assessments that should be happening at regular intervals. They may not be bathing your family members in in the the times and and care that are indicated for them. So when it comes to delegating your thoughts and giving away your critical analysis to someone because they've got letters after their name, friend, don't do that. Don't do that.
Don't do that. When they ask, do you wanna do this or do you wanna do this? The thing that we should be thinking in our mind is, what questions do I need to be asking here? And is there any real pressing time need to finishing this decision process immediately. Delay.
Delay. Delay. I'm telling you. Delay. Delay.
Delay. Take your time. Take your breath. Because when, for instance, if you're being offered a procedure, being offered a drug, so much of your mind, particularly if you're not feeling well to begin with and if you're in the hospital because you are not well, your mind is not operating the way it needs to because you're sick, because you're not at your best. Why in the world would we expect patients to be best at advocating for themselves and determining what's in their own best interest instantaneously, particularly if they've got a whole bunch of drugs on board?
So you have to be able to give this is a big important word informed consent. And part of that informed consent is you saying, I'm gonna take a step back here. As long as there's nothing emergent that has to be decided within five minutes, let me reflect on this and get back to you. So rather than trusting someone, say whatever you think is best, reflect on it yourself, take some time, simmer down, process it, and then make the decision that's in your best interest. I know we've covered a lot of things today, but before we really wrap up, I want to drive a point home for you.
No one is going to take better care of you than you. No one is gonna take better care of you or your family than you are. No one is as vested in interest as you are. So what that means is particularly in a time and a place where we're in such dire straits from a lack of a moral compass and political division in The United States because of this lack of moral compass. When you are going into care, you really have to assume upon yourself the role of a secondary care provider for you or your family member.
This is one of the reasons why I have created the online courses, the four and the seven hour course, because that four hour course that I've made the foundations of medical prep, guys, if you invest the time and energy into taking that course, you are gonna be in such a better position, a, to read or care for yourself and to avoid having to go to see doctors and hospitals, etcetera, in the first place, but b, god forbid, should you actually need to go into care, you're gonna be able to converse on a more equal level with these people so that they're not talking down to you and you're not exactly sure, wait a what do they mean by that? What do those numbers mean? How did they get that? On what basis did they make this assessment? You're already gonna have learned this stuff.
So when you are interacting with them, you're now really narrowing that gap of a power deficit. You remember that power deficit that we talked about earlier? The more that you know and the more that you're armed with knowledge and the more that your skills are brought up to where they need to be, you are bringing that power back into yourself. You are reeling it back in. Woo.
Cast it away. Reel it back in. So by reeling that power back into yourself, you're gonna be in a place that you're not gonna be as intimidated as easily, and you're going to make better decisions because you can stop and filter through that line of thinking. One of the things that I think is the most important about the work that I've done as a course facilitator and as an educator over the years, and I'll I'll tell this to people in class, my goal is to teach you how to think. My goal is to teach you how to filter through the information that you're seeing and come to the best and most logical conclusions based on what you have learned and what you found.
So plug there for the class. If you haven't taken that class, especially the four hour one, the foundation's medical prep class, guys, for the price of that class, if it saves you one trip to the doctor, paid for itself, two, now you're at a profit. But really in the day that we live, I wanna bring this back for a moment into some of the things that we've seen from a political standpoint. Guys, it has not been that long since Charlie Kirk was assassinated, And the things that we saw in the aftermath, in the medical industry, doctors, nurses, physicians, health care providers, pharmacists, reveling his death, wishing that people who followed him, conservatives, etcetera, received the same. These people are sickos.
They happen to be educated. They happen to have letters after their name. But make no mistake, they're not magnanimous. They are not some type of give love to the world carte blanche. They happen to work in health care usually because it pays for their mortgage and pays for their golf courses and pays for everything that they need, but they are every bit the bleeding heart radicals who hate you and me.
And when you're going into care from people like this, you really have to be on your guard. And hopefully, you're aware of these persuasions and you are making your choices with who you're receiving care from accordingly, particularly when it comes to those people caring for your children, particularly when it comes to those people caring for for your older family members, but also your primary care providers and your family physicians that you see. It is very important that you find people who are aligned with you on that. And if you can't, because I recognize a lot of people who, for instance, live in rural areas or, you know people who have very limiting insurance plans, you may not be able to see the people that you like, to see the physicians healthcare providers that you like. So if you are in that situation, my advice to you hopefully that you'll have internalized after watching this video in totality.
Remember your fifth amendment the same way that you would interact with a policeman at a stop. You have a right to remain silent and you don't have to tell anyone anything that you don't want to. I am not by any means advocating shirking care for people or that people should not seek medical care when they need, but what I am advocating for is to be zealous in guarding your information and to be very much proactive and on the defense when it comes to interacting with people who are in a power advantage over you and to whom you are giving very sensitive information. So be aware of this, friends. Unfortunately, because of the times that we live in, I don't see this getting better anytime soon, but what we can do is to shield ourselves and to take care of our family members and really to self select out of the system.
That is the reason for this channel. That is the reason for the classes that I have taught over the years. That is the reason for the mechanism and the teaching the the teaching that I do in order to help people not have to jeopardize their safety and not have to put themselves, and subjugate themselves into a system that really doesn't have their best interests at heart. If you got value out of this video, friends, please share this with one person, one person who you know would benefit from it. One friend who you know, they might be in this situation.
Share it, friends. Wanna make sure that good people get this information and that they're shielded and protected from a potentially malevolent alliance between the government and health care informers who do not have their best interests at heart. Hope the video was a blessing to y'all. Have a wonderful week. For now, it's Patriot nurse.
Sign off, and I'll see y'all later. Bye.
@DianaT192 - Diana PATRIOTS ARE UNITED❤️🇺🇸❤️🙏
This nurse tells the truths about our horrible medical system ! https://t.co/qgR0d2ERlo
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 announces that they are retiring tomorrow, the last day of ten years working in a hospital, and shares key messages they believe others in the field should know. They reiterate their guidance: do not put your name on the donor registry, even though you can donate and share your life or organs; they note that their prior video with this point was taken down, but they are repeating it.
They express strong, conspiratorial concerns about food safety, claiming they are being harmed by what is put in food because of a for-profit health care system aimed at making people sick to drive health-care spending. They pose questions about how cancer, diabetes, and other diseases are caused, attributing these to diet and processed foods, and urge stopping processed foods.
They urge listeners to stop vaping and state a personal view that cigarettes might be a better option than vaping. They describe cases of people with pneumothorax resulting from vaping cartridges being used too aggressively, and warn that vaping can send someone to an early grave. They also suggest a cynical view about aging and social security, implying society does not want people to reach old age for financial reasons, and question what defense people have in the country, framing life as a basic wish to live without being obstructed.
They advise always getting a second opinion after any medical diagnosis, emphasizing that doctors can be fallible and that one should seek multiple opinions to protect oneself.
Despite these warnings, Speaker 0 expresses gratitude for the field of medicine, noting pride in learning, meeting amazing people, and the daily opportunity to help others. They describe waking up every day to assist someone as filling their heart and state a hope that more medical people feel the same.
The address ends on a personal note about retirement, with Speaker 0 asking the audience to share what their day looks like as they retire the next day.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So I am lucky enough to say that I'm retiring tomorrow. Tomorrow is my last day of my ten years of working in a hospital, and I'm gonna share with you some things that I really think you guys need to to know as somebody who's been doing this a hot minute. My other video got kinda taken down, but I'm gonna say it again. Do not put your name on the registry. Okay?
You can donate, share your life, absolutely, share your organs, but do not put your name on the donor registry. They took down that video, so I'm gonna kinda stuff it in here and see if we can keep going and maybe it'll slide. They are trying to kill us with our food. They are. I'm sorry.
I've been seeing 20 year olds who are coming in with cardiac problems. It's not just the food, the energy drinks, the vaping, all of those things, guys. You know that they're testing the bread and the candies to see what kind of poison they're putting in it. And the reason they're putting poison in our food is because we have a for profit health care system. They are trying to make us sick so that we spend our money in health care.
How do you get cancer? How do you get any of these diseases? Diabetes? It's all on what you put in your body. We have to stop eating processed foods.
Please stop vaping. Stop vaping. Cigarettes are, I think, better point than vaping. We were seeing people coming in with pneumos because they try and hit that cartridge too hard and they actually pop a lung. You have to quit vaping.
That will send you to an early grave. And they don't want us to get older because we're paying into social security, right? And they don't want us to hit the age where we actually will take it. What defense do we have at this point in this country? All we're trying to do is just live our lives.
Always get a second opinion. I know, anytime a doctor or anyone diagnoses you with anything, always get a second opinion. They might be the highest, best doctor in the thing, always get a second, maybe even third opinion. Medical people are humans and they make mistakes. Please protect yourself.
I love medicine and I feel very grateful to have been able to work in this field. And I've learned so many things, and I've met so many amazing people. I'm really grateful that I got to go and wake up every day and help someone. That fills my heart, and that's why I do this. And I hope that more medical people feel the same way still.
Have a great day, guys. I'm retiring tomorrow. What's your day?
@kacdnp91 - Kelly DNP Functional/Integrative Medicine
What is allopathic health? Does anyone know who this is bc she’s brilliant 🤣 https://t.co/zjb7JRO8U9
Video Transcript AI Summary
The clinician apologizes for the wait, notes being about forty-five minutes late, and thanks the patient for waiting. They ask how the patient has been in the last couple of months. The patient responds that it has been bad, and the clinician asks if that is the patient’s normal baseline, confirming that it is. The patient agrees they are doing worse. The clinician acknowledges and expresses concern, asking if the patient has been exercising, drinking plenty of water, and getting enough sleep. The patient confirms some activity but the clinician urges “More. Do more of that. More. More. More.” The clinician asks about sleep quality again, suggesting that more sleep can be beneficial.
The clinician notes the patient has increased joint pain, and attributes this to the patient’s history and overall condition, advising a little more exercise and more sleep as potentially beneficial for the joint pain. The patient is reminded of being on five thousand milligrams of their medication, and the clinician confirms to keep that dosage. The clinician states there is no real timeline for this medication and says the patient will probably be on it for the rest of their life, but with regular specialist follow-ups for side effects to ensure things are fine. The clinician adds that they understand and mention having many patients with similar experiences.
Regarding new symptoms, the patient reports chest pain, and the clinician notes this requires referral to cardiology. Another symptom mentioned is severe stomach pain, which prompts a referral to gastroenterology (GI). The patient’s home situation is described as tough, and the clinician asks whether the patient has seen a counselor, offering a referral to one. Skin issues are also noted; the clinician observes a couple of concerns upon the patient’s entrance and prescribes a cream, acknowledging it may not be very effective but intending to try it. There is a brief acknowledgment that the situation is challenging and that not much can be done about some aspects.
The clinician asks if the patient eats fish and confirms that the overall assessment is that the patient is not doing well and feeling terrible. A plan is made to schedule a follow-up in about three to six months, with the understanding that the same process will be repeated. The clinician concludes by instructing the patient to check out at the desk.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hey. Sorry for the wait. Yeah. I know I know I'm, like, forty five minutes late, but thank you for waiting. How are you doing?
It's good to see you. Alright. So how have you been these last couple months? Bad. Bad.
Got it. And that's like your normal. Right? That's your, like, baseline. Okay.
Got it. So would you say you're doing worse? Yes? Okay. Yeah.
Sorry to hear about that. And have you been exercising plenty, drinking lots and lots of water? Yeah? Okay. Good.
More. Do more of that. More. More. More.
Okay? More. Have you tried getting more sleep? Yeah. That can be really beneficial for you.
Have you been dealing with increased joint pain? Yes. Okay. Well, I mean, that's normal, you know, given your history and just generally who you are. For the joint pain, I would say a little more exercise and also sleep.
I think that would be really good for you. Alright. Remind me, you are on five thousand milligrams of your medication? Okay. Good.
Let's keep that up. Seems to be working. Timeline? No. There's not really a timeline for this medication.
You'll probably be on it for the rest of your life. But as long as you go see the specialists for the side effects, you know, everything will be fine. I understand. I I have a lot of patients just like you all going through the same exact stuff. Yeah.
The same. Any new symptoms? Chest pain. Got it. Okay.
Not much I can do about that on my end, so I'll refer you to cardiology. Anything else? Severe stomach pain? Got it. I'll refer you to GI for that one.
Yeah. How's how's everything at home? That's tough. Yeah. Do you see a counselor?
I'll refer you to one. And skin issues? Couple. Yeah. I've noticed that when you walked in.
I'll give you a cream. We'll see if it works. It probably won't, but we'll see. I know. I know it's tough.
Yeah. Unfortunately, that's just how it is, and there's not much we can do about it. Do you eat fish? So just generally not doing good and feeling terrible. Got it.
Alright. Well, let's schedule a follow-up for about three, six months. Okay? And then we'll just do this all over again. Alright.
Sounds great. Alright. Make sure to check out at the desk. Okay?