reSee.it - Related Post Feed

Saved - April 22, 2024 at 5:32 PM

@VictorFromDE - Victor Scott

A father discussing how his daughter was killed in the hospital and all of the techniques and deception used to do it. /7 https://t.co/YpWJ35TEoy

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker's daughter was almost put on a ventilator based on incorrect test results. The speaker challenged the doctor's decision and discovered the numbers were inaccurate. The daughter was not given certain treatments and the speaker was removed from the hospital for questioning protocols. The daughter's oxygen levels were misrepresented, leading to her death from respiratory failure caused by a sedation drug. The speaker's advocacy was absent for 44 hours, during which the daughter's sedation was increased, ultimately contributing to her death. The hospital's negligence led to the daughter's death.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Doctor came in and said, you'll need to put your daughter on a ventilator in the next 2 hours. You know, what the heck happened here? So I asked him, what is that based on? And he said, well, we did a blood gas draw last night and it shows that she needs to be on a ventilator. He says that we, you know, we did this blood gas draw last night. So I asked him what time he said, 11:30. I said, well, that 11:30 last night, Grace's blood pressure was 235 over 135 and her heart rate was 150 beats a minute. So I said, I don't think those numbers are objective and I want you to retake the numbers. So they did and Grace was fine. And she said, well, Grace's oxygen saturation's only at 85%. And because I was suspecting I would get COVID while I was in the room with Grace, I had all of my COVID materials in the room, including my own oxygen pulse ox. So I put that on Grace's finger, and it read 95%. So I called the nurse back in and said, is my finger meter accurate? And she said, yes. It is. I said, well, why is my meter reading 95% while your machine is only reading 85 percent? And she said it's because the leads get sweaty. She was only in the hospital 7 days. She was never on remdesivir or Avent because we refused those treatments. But they figured out a different way to take her out. And so I was with her from 6th through the morning of 10th. I was taken out by an armed guard for challenging, you know, the protocols. That's a whole another story. But then we had to hire an attorney to get my daughter Jessica in as a replacement and so Grace didn't have advocacy for 44 hours. During that 44 hours they increased the dose of a sedation drug called Presodex 7 different times. So they sedated my best buddy instead of taking care of her. And that drug, they started her on October 9th. So by the time her last day came around, October 13th, she was already on it for 4 days. The package insert says specifically to not use that drug for more than 24 hours because it causes acute respiratory failure. They listed the first cause of death on Grace's death certificate as acute respiratory failure which was directly caused by the hospital using that drug. So that piece of Grace's death certificate is true.
Saved - June 25, 2023 at 3:57 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Ukraine has become a hub for organ trafficking, sex trafficking, and money laundering. The new transplant laws allow hospitals, prisons, military units, and orphanages to use the organs of anyone under their care. Black market surgeons profit from illegal organ trafficking, violating human rights. Doctors Without Borders and The Red Cross have been accused of human organ trafficking. The United States' involvement in Ukraine is to sacrifice Ukraine to destroy Ukraine in order to bleed Russia. The organ harvesting industry is a criminal enterprise, and it's best to state organ donation in your will.

@TheThe1776 - ꪻꫝể ꪻꫝể

1/6) Ukraine is the Money Laundering, Sex Trafficking and Organ Harvesting Capital of the World. This thread is about Organ Harvesting in Ukraine. On 04/14/2022 the Ukrainian Parliament passed a law 5610 which clear Ukraine to export Organs abroad. Organs were removed without consent and the laws were passed during ongoing military actions. These laws were promoted by former acting health minister Ulyana Suprun. Under the new transplants laws Hospitals, Prisons, Military Units, and Orphanages are free to use the organs of anyone under their care.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The Ukrainian Parliament passed laws allowing organ donation without consent, including from children, and permitting the sale of organs abroad. Private clinics have the right to harvest organs without doctors' or undertakers' consent. Lieutenant General Vladimir Konanov has witnessed the actions of "river doctors" who exploit these laws. Former acting Ukrainian health minister Ulyana Suprun and Mikhail Radutsky, owner of Ukraine's largest network of private clinics, support these laws. American journalist George Eliason has exposed illegal organ harvesting in Ukraine. Human trafficking and disappearances also increased during this time. Correspondence between Ukrainian and German individuals discussed organ supply from Don Bass. Code abbreviations were used for different organs.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: 16th 2021. The Ukrainian Parliament approved law number 5831. It stipulates Ukrainians, including children, can become organ donors posthumously without their notarized consent and without relatives' consent. Organs can be sold abroad. A special database exists that cooperates with foreign clinics. On April 14, 2022, the Ukrainian parliament passed another law, number 56 one zero. It exempts organ transplantation from VAT. The road to Supporting Ukrainian organs abroad was clear. Serbian lawyer, Gordon Petrunjevic, knows how so called black market transplant surgeons operated in his home country. A particular of transplantology laws adopted in Ukraine is this, The right to harvest organs is granted to unsupervised private clinics. Organs are removed without consent of doctors or undertakers. These laws were passed during ongoing military action. Lieutenant general Vladimir Konanov, consigned Dar has fought in many of Donbas's hotspots and has risen through the ranks from soldier to defense minister of the Donetsk People's Republic. He's seen enough evidence of what so called river doctors do. These laws are promoted by former acting Ukrainian health minister Ulyana Suprun, and Mikhail Radutsky, a member of Zelensky's servant of the People's Party. Radutsky owns Ukraine's largest network of private clinics, and his commercial interest is obvious. US citizen, or doctor Death as she's known in Ukraine, has said repeatedly, Ukrainian kidneys and corneas are welcomed in the west. Vasily Prozorov, a former Ukrainian security service officer who sided with Russia for ideological reasons in 2014, has documents confirming Suprun's criminal activities in Ukraine. Under the new transplant laws, The authorities of Ukrainian hospitals, prisons, military units, and orphanages are free to use the organs of anyone under their care. The law lifts the ban preventing a transplant surgeon from taking part in a council of doctors who certify the death of a patient or his brain, after which organs can be harvested. Speaker 1: Because The doctors can now take, organs, you know, who's to say when they did it? Because the net result is the same. The person's life is snuffed out. They're not alive. Can they complain? Except a doctor that's going to know the truth. Speaker 0: American journalist George Eliason has covered developments in Ukraine since Maidan. He's been involved in exhuming graves of civilians killed by Ukrainian death squads. He submitted materials he'd collected to the US Senate, after which funding for the Azot regimen was temporarily suspended. Speaker 1: From 2013 to 2014, human trafficking doubled in Ukraine. And Between, March 2014 and September 2014, 26 2,600 people went missing, and they weren't accounted for. Speaker 0: The first reports of illegal organ harvesting came around the same time. LPR colonel Vitaly Kiselyov, of cosign communist, has been defending his homeland since 2014 from the moment Ukraine attacked Donbas and started killing its citizens. Liberating his homeland, Vladimir Kononov found much evidence of the so called ripper doctors. Alexander Torba, a doctor emeritus of the Lhugan People's Republic, is also aware of these gruesome findings. In 2014, a group of Ukrainian hackers, Cyberbearkut, published correspondence between former Ukrainian prime minister Yulia Timoshenko's lawyer, Sergei Vlasinca, and German transplant surgeon, Olga Weber, discussing organ supply from Don Bass. Code abbreviations were used. Core, heart. Nep, Kidney. Hep, liver. Pan, pancreas. Pull, lungs.

@TheThe1776 - ꪻꫝể ꪻꫝể

2/6) The head of the Federal Reserve Center Sergey Gotye Chief Transplantologist said “Either you're a transplant surgeon or a crook… Black market surgeons aren't surgeons. They're people who profit from illegal organ trafficking…This is a product of war…it’s murdered... who had no intention to become donors. This is a violation of human rights, no one asked them…And, therefore, it is a criminal offence…”. Today’s Neo-Nazi will harvest the organs and sell it for a profit before they gas them and burn them in ovens.

Video Transcript AI Summary
We have a growing number of orders, but there are concerns about the quality of goods. Conditions are becoming more difficult, with security risks and delays in accessing materials. The Ukrainian government officials seem to be involved, as there is no investigation into the black market organ trade. Organ procurement may soon be carried out by Global Rescue, with a contract from the OSCE. There are reports of crematoria deployed in Ukraine, causing panic among border troops. The legendary commander GIVI witnessed the human organ black market targeting Europe, the US, and Israel. Neo-Nazis in Ukraine are said to be involved in organ harvesting. These disturbing findings were discovered in 2014 in a village called the communar.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We're getting more and more orders. Do I have enough people? Put it down. 15 core, 63 NEP, 35 HEP, 20 pan, five pull. Speaker 1: Got it. I've passed it on. Speaker 0: Sergei, I've placed another order with you, but there were a lot of poor quality goods in the last batch. You're letting me down. Speaker 1: Olga, you haven't been here. You don't see how things are, and conditions are getting tougher and tougher. Speaker 0: T is suffering. My people are getting access to material too late. Customers are waiting. Speaker 1: There's Fire. Bombs going off. How are we supposed to transfer your men? Ensuring security is very difficult. We have to move this stuff out on Our own. Speaker 0: Is there proper access to the badly wounded and hopeless cases? Speaker 1: There is a big risk of a and too many questions from the local staff. Speaker 0: Don't let me down. Look for more material and choose the best. Speaker 1: There is plenty of material, No. But it's hard to get it out. Speaker 2: The participants claim that it's Moscow Medley. However, they don't file a lawsuit against Cyber Berkowitz, and Ukraine state authorities haven't launched an investigation either. Speaker 3: Most certainly, the Ukrainian government officials, security officials like the the SBU, and police are involved. They would have to be. Why? Otherwise, it would be investigated. And it's not and it's not going to be. Speaker 2: Harvested organs aren't stored long. Transport must be immediate. If its storage period expires, The organ can't be used. The head of the Shumakov Federal Research denture of transplantology and artificial organs. Professor Sergei Gautier has his own definition of black market transplant surgeons. Europe has also taken an The Italian publication, Polittica Mente Correto, Posted an article by doctor Guilfredo De Linzey saying, organ procurement will soon be carried out by Global Rescue, which specializes in this type of supply and has a contract with the OSCE. Speaker 3: The problem is is the head All of the OSCE here is very political, and they don't bring anybody that's not supporting Ukraine. Now I caught the American OSCE rep actively working intelligence For Ukraine. Ukrainian intelligence officers coming around traveling with o s OSCE. Speaker 2: In his investigation, doctor Dylan Sey also writes about crematoria deployed in Ukraine. At the beginning of 2022, German defense minister Christine Lambrecht said they'd send field hospitals And mobile crematorium stations to help Ukraine. The news threw the border troops into a panic because everyone But the events of 2014 when the fighting in Southeast Ukraine whistling to a human organ's black market Targeting Europe, the US, and Israel. Traffic was controlled by SBU officers. The legendary Somalia battalion commander Mikhail Tolstikh, callsign GIVI, fought on the front lines from the start of war in Donbas. He saw what was happening on the Ukrainian side of the border in real time. OAM. He was killed by Ukrainian death squads in 2017. Speaker 1: Bull. Speaker 2: The Bandarists are Hitler's direct successors. And the Nazis had huge experience when it came to dealing, finally, with people. Today's neo Nazis wouldn't stand for just gassing people and burning them in ovens. 1st, they'd harvest organs and sell them at a profit. Ukrainian were trained in organ extraction by foreigners. Head of the DPR, Alexander Zakhachanka, assassinated by Ukrainian Nazis, left an article about terrible finds discovered in 2014 in the village of and mine number 22 called the communar.

@TheThe1776 - ꪻꫝể ꪻꫝể

3/6) Lots of intel came in about bodies of Men leaving Slavyansk Ukraine in 2014 being found without organs. The danger may be that a wounded Ukrainian army soldier won't be given necessary medical care because they are considered suitable donor material. So they decided to profit by selling the organs of their own dead soldiers, and those of orphans, through investigations within Donbass, almost 2,000 orphaned children were taken from children's homes. According to the WHO every year there are more than 10,000 black market human organs sales. Cost of Organs in Euros: ◦Whole Liver: €150,000 - €550,000 ◦Liver Section:€40,000 ◦Eye Cornea: €4,000 - €15,000 ◦Kidney: €18,000 - €250,000 ◦Bone Marrow: 1 gram = €20,000 ◦Heart: €160,000 - €300,000 ◦1 Lung: €60,000 2 Lungs: €200,000

Video Transcript AI Summary
According to the World Health Organization, the black market for human organs is thriving, with prices ranging from €4,000 to €550,000 depending on the organ. Corruption in Ukraine has created a new category of victims, including wounded soldiers and prisoners, who are seen as potential organ donors. The government of Ukraine has been accused of profiting from the sale of organs, even from their own dead soldiers and orphans. Orphanages in Odessa have been implicated in child trafficking, further highlighting the dark side of the organ trade. The fate of missing children from Donbas remains unknown, as Ukraine refuses to provide any information or adhere to international norms.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: According to the World Health Organization, every year, there are more than 10,000 black market human organ Prices vary depending on region. A whole liver costs from 150 to €550,000 apart from 40,000. A cornea is from 4 to 15,000, a kidney from 18 to 250,000. Bone marrow is sold by weight. 1 gram costs about 20,000. A heart costs from 160 to 300,000. Alung is 60,000. A pair is 200,000. Prices in euros. To conceal tracks, crematoria as well as other are used. Doctor Guilfredo de Linze also writes, the danger may be that a wounded Ukrainian army soldier Won't be given necessary medical care because they're considered suitable donor material. Speaker 1: Because of the the just the level of corruption in Ukraine and the level of crime, you're creating a whole new category of victim. If Anybody that's in the hospital, and whether it's Ukrainian military, whether it's a a prisoner in Ukrainian custody, Or it's people from, Donbas village because they wanna cleanse them out too. And their value is no longer that, Some of their lives, their value is what you can get on an open market for their body parts. And this is disgusting, but this is just part and parcel with what the government of Ukraine has become. Speaker 0: Once the richest of the Soviet Republics, Ukraine, turned into the poorest. Maidan started violently. The budget was plundered, and industry was destroyed. The most valuable land, the famous black Toil was sold. War was unleashed, and millions of people are forced to live abroad against their will. So they decided to profit by selling the organs of their own Dead soldiers and those of orphans. Children's home number 1, the oldest in Lugansk, is operational. Children of all ages live here. Victoria Machalova is the boss and main teacher at the children's home. The kids address her affectionately as mama Vika. Back in 2014, Citing the military danger, the Ukrainian authorities ordered the evacuation of all children who had lost their parents in Donbas. Speaker 1: With, the orphans that went to Odessa, the orphanage down there itself was run by American Diaspora. If you're looking at, say, 7 people that were responsible for the children, 5 of them were Americans. And these were people that were supporting the combat that property sector was doing in After that, a year later, in publications like The Huffington Post, They were reporting that the orphanages in Odessa, which were being supported by churches, which is this particular one, and These particular children were being used for child trafficking. Okay? So you have children missing there. The human trafficking quotient is where you're going to find the black Organ trade. Speaker 0: Yulia Nazarenka, children's ombudsman in the Lugansk People's Republic, is investigating cases of missing children. 2022 saw a repeat With children once again being evacuated from territories controlled by Kyiv. Hundreds of orphans from the Donetsk People's Republic were evacuated in the same manner. Anyone's guess how to find children who have essentially been abducted from Donbas. The most favorable outcome would be adoption, but there's a question mark on that. Question mark on that. Ukraine ignores all international legislative norms and refuses to say anything about the fate of children it has taken.

@TheThe1776 - ꪻꫝể ꪻꫝể

4/6) Doctors Without Borders and The Red Cross were sent to Ukraine and said to have dealings with Neo-Nazis. Doctors Without Borders activities was led by Bernard Kouchner, he was the Alpha and Omega of the organ trade in Ukraine. Carla Del Ponte a Former Prosecutor wrote in her book that the most shocking crimes she uncovered was Albanian trafficking human organs and she directly accused Kouchner and Doctors Without Borders of human organ trafficking. It's a full-fledged project organized by a major criminal group: partly from NATO, Western countries and NGOs like Doctors Without Borders. Just after the liberation of Vukovar, Serbian detachment found a whole mountain of unburied corpses with their abdominal cavities ripped open for the purpose of surgically removing organs. Also a doctor named Fedak sold 130 newborn babies organ to the U.S. and told the mothers in Ukraine that their babies had died. His assistant was Oleg Tyagnibok, a hospital attendant from the 'Svoboda" party in the Verkhovna Rada that's declared itself a Nazi party.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Doctors Without Borders and the Red Cross have faced allegations of involvement with Neo-Nazis and human organ trafficking in Ukraine and Kosovo. The head physician of a hospital in Lvov was accused of selling newborns' organs to the United States, while children were taken away from their parents under false pretenses. The Red Cross, during World War 2, allegedly ignored the suffering of Soviet prisoners while caring for US and European prisoners. In Kosovo, former prosecutor Carla Del Ponte accused Doctors Without Borders of human organ trafficking, but only after she had resigned. Serbian journalist Mjodrak Zarkovic believes law enforcement in his country hides the truth and only reveals it for personal gain. The contents of Del Ponte's book are known to Western intelligence services and peacekeeping organizations.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Cross and Doctors Without Borders who are said to have dealings with Neo Nazis in Ukraine. There have been allegations against Doctors Without Borders, of human organ trafficking in Kosovo, and it's thought that representatives of the organization were present when the children were evacuated. Children are also taken away from their parents under various pretexts. Selling children in Ukraine is anything but new. The investigation and found that the head physician of the Lvov Regional Clinical Hospital, Bogdan Fedak, sold newborns' organs to the United States, telling their mothers in Ukraine that their children had died. International Tarian organizations seem unconcerned about crimes being committed in Ukraine. Director of the Lugansk Children's Tuberculosis Hospital recalls. During World War 2, international humanitarian organizations, most notably the Red Cross, ignored the suffering of Soviet prisoners in the the same way. Soldiers, women, children were killed, burned, and horrible experiments were done. But the Red Cross allegedly kept silent. The same organization cared well for US and European prisoners. The president of the Red Cross, Carl J Burkart, officially supported the Nazis and was personally received by Hitler. It was through Red Cross channels that Adolf Eichmann, mastermind of the final solution to the Jewish question, maniacal doctor Josef Mengele, Klaus Babbe, nickname the Butcher of Lyon, and lesser known Nazis were able to escape justice. In 1999, Doctors Without Borders putting an appearance in Kosovo as well. Berneur Kuzhneur, doctor and diplomat, the ideologists behind the Doctors Without Borders organization established in 1971. Today, it's an international movement involving more than 63,000 people. Their activities are thought to be noble and humane. But in 2005, a book written by a former prosecutor of The Hague tribunal, Carla Del Ponte, was released Call the Hunt, Me and War Criminals. During her work in Kosovo. The prosecutor saw much. Albanians trafficking human organs was the most shocking crime she uncovered. Del Ponte directly accused Kushner and Doctors Without Borders of human organ trafficking. But the accusation only came out once Del Ponte had resigned as chief prosecutor. Speaker 1: While Carlo Dovonte was the head prosecutor of the country's bureau. He kept silent about it. He ignored all the evidence, Not only on this issue, but on many other issues. After that, when she is not on the that position anymore, when she can only benefit from telling the truth, for example, in her book. Speaker 0: Serbian journalist Mjodrak Zarkovic has no illusions about the actions of law enforcement in his country. Speaker 1: Court reveals some truth that they don't want. Afterwards, when they can earn money From hints, from allegations, from suspicions. Yeah. Then they do that. Speaker 0: The chairman of the Society of Missing Serbs in Kosovo, Simor Spasic, lost relatives when the West savagely carved up Yugoslavia. The contents of The Hunt, Me and the War Criminals are well known to both Western intelligence services and various peacekeeping organizations.

@TheThe1776 - ꪻꫝể ꪻꫝể

5/6) Carla Del Ponte: UN Officials in Kosovo, NATO Military and EU Representatives interfered with crimes committed by Albanians. She wrote “We were denied documents my advisors agree the investigation of NATO activities was impossible” Elizabeth Debru appeared in the confession of a former employee of the Security Service of Ukraine, who spoke about the scheme for the removal of organs from Ukrainian servicemen who died or were mortally wounded in Donbass. Elizabeth Debru a transplant surgeon was forcing doctors to remove organs without consent or did it herself and Everything was sent abroad. It was President of Georgia Mikhail Saakashvili's wife, Sandra Roelofs who was the mission's true organizer. She's linked with 'black' transplanting worldwide and was nicknamed ‘Sandra the Ripper' in Georgia because her name often appear in scandals related to illegal organ harvesting. Sandra Roelofs had a medical foundation that specializes in providing “help” to people. Many of these so-called organizations are hiding under the guise of a humanitarian mission. These organizations engaged in the deadly crime of organ trafficking to make BIG money!

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: Talked about a bike accident and something about the chest. Speaker 1: Mentioned dust, smoke, and oil. Speaker 2: Discussed a woman named Elizabeth de Bruk who is involved in some kind of illegal activities related to organ extraction. She had connections in Ukraine and Georgia. Speaker 3: Talked about the woman's criminal activities and her association with a person named Mikhail. Mentioned scandals related to organ trafficking. Speaker 1: Described how the woman's style of work changed and she started performing organ extractions without consent. Speaker 3: Mentioned that the woman had a foundation and worked in Ukraine. Speaker 1: Talked about the woman's involvement in illegal organ trafficking and how she would perform surgeries on injured individuals. Speaker 0: Mentioned someone named Vladimir and talked about organ trafficking in Ukraine. Speaker 2: Discussed how some individuals were taken to America or Romania after being injured and their organs were harvested. Speaker 4: Described the conditions created by the Ukrainian regime for illegal organ trafficking and experimentation. Speaker 0: Mentioned a medical center where people witnessed individuals involved in organ trafficking leaving the area.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Любил слил живу как у ло байк кучи если надо да s за у груди Speaker 1: пыль под ху активно дым. И масло Speaker 2: Прошла разведка и мы получали перехват в районе Артем появилась небе женщина элизабет де брюк мы поднимали информацию по поводу этой женщины мы узнали о том что она является очень авторитет транс черным транс вам на территории америки этот де брюк она еще объявила в 2014 году в районе то которое было временно контроль стороне север дон нет лис к св на Speaker 1: служба украины прошлого года был отправлен зона пола января с нами начала профессиональный транс забит де она полностью поменялась стиль нашей работы нашей группы заставлял вынимать урон без всякой согласия ранен сейчас она сама все делала сара за 7 10 минут могла вырезать пару почек ранен или обо бойца я не знаю платили семьям этих бедных жертв или платили вообще все отправлял за гордон большинство по было со сто 128 гор бригады эль часто звонили на мобильный у нее также был спутников телефоны роутер роутера я английский знаю хорошо и поэтому как бы слышал все что она говорила элис х и просили улучшить качество из извлечения органов постараемся стан отвечала она это была жена на михаила с страны ру она являлась реальным организатор нашей Speaker 3: фигура сан Ру о и в мире ее четко с деятельностью черных транс насколько я знаю в Грузии не прозвище сан пот потому что как раз очень часто ее фамилия фигурирует скандала, связанных с не из органов человеческих тел. Ру по моим данным существует фонд спец на ока помощи людям опять благо предлог. А вместе с ми михаил с длительное время работал на территорию украины. На Украине появилось ее так прямо называли груз команда. Их очень много приехала из Грузии и они заняли свои высокие должности в разных структура украинской власти от генеральной прокуратуры до министерства з здравоохранения александр К ш Это был близкий друг Ми михаила а он порядка полутора лет руководил министерство здравоохранения Украины. Ну груз было очень многое. Speaker 1: Всё поменялось после визита с в зону а то и я со его в к полу называл товар он говорил что мы этим помогаем больным Европы и сша ожидаю свежие человеческие все пошло дьявол путем тех ребят которые были за у въезд артём записали в про без вести получилось так что их просто убили никакие согласия не за и родственники ко ничего не платили это сан все звонила и звонила т выполнить заказ при города опасной она на почки и селе вырезала сознание от взрыва мины девочки двенадцати 12 лет ее родного отца. Даже помню фамилию владимир Для ш Speaker 0: кто-то на руку на органах их сыновей, как они говорят Украины, которых просто имели возможно тяжелые ранения вместо того чтобы оказать помощь, их просто в скрывал и разделы раздела извините, как на просто на столе, кому сердце, кому легкая кому почки. Speaker 3: Le people Speaker 2: К примеру во он не имеет шансов вы чтобы его не разбирать на части они его ко это сильно обе на таком состоянии его якобы возят на р в америку либо велико либо ру румынии больше при и там от его уже ничего не остается Speaker 4: для украинского украинского режима присутствия ин это сравним с божество, ему можно делать все что угодно. Поэтому они создавались все право условия в рамках которых они занимались из органов и проведение каких-то экспериментов опыта и сбор соответствующий материала, который нужен был под конкретную задачу. Speaker 0: Мир Speaker 4: Медицинский центр были эти люди, которые буквально за несколько дней до взять теле, они собрались и покинули эту территорию и люди это видели, они свидетельства о том, что эти люди там были. Которые находились располагались прямо в клиника, которые занимались какими-то своими опыта

@TheThe1776 - ꪻꫝể ꪻꫝể

6/6) The United States has many goals in Ukraine, but protecting the Ukrainian people is just LIES we were fed. This is No different than the LIES to deliver democracy to the people of Iraq, Libya etc. They have destroyed these people! If you are in the pro Ukraine camp, you should know the real reason we are in Ukraine was/is to sacrifice Ukraine to destroy Ukraine in order to bleed Russia. The country suffering most from the Ukraine/Russia war is Ukraine. Their people are dying in huge numbers! Their buildings are all being blown to bits! Their entire country is being destroyed! Asked yourself why does THE MEDIA want us to care about this war when we have no geopolitical interest in Ukraine, this is to push the Globalist Agenda which is to take out anyone “Putin” who stands in the way of furthering their Agenda! “After the demilitarization of Ukraine is done, a separate military tribunal will be held for 'black' transplant surgeons.” says Aleksandr Torba Distinguished Doctor, LPR Rector State Medical University. The list of the connected West crimes are long and sad and must be brought to an End! I use to have on my Drivers License that I am an organ donor, but I took it off. Knowing how the organ harvesting industry works through research, it’s best to state it in your Will than have it on your DL if you wish to donate your organs. #EndOrganTrafficking #EndSexTrafficking #EndMoneyLaunderingOfOurHardEarnedTaxDollars #NotAnotherRedCentToCorruptUkraine #IWillNotSupportAnyCandidateWhoSupportGivingMoneyToUkraine #PuttingOtherCountriesFirstMeansYouPutAmericaLast

Video Transcript AI Summary
Russian soldiers claim to have discovered a horrifying situation in Ukraine, where children as young as 27 are allegedly being raised in factory farm conditions. The attractive ones are said to be sold as sex slaves to elite pedophiles, while the rest are reportedly carved up for organ harvesting. A Russian officer emotionally describes the children being treated like livestock by their Ukrainian captors. The Kremlin accuses the Kiev regime of earning millions of dollars annually from this illegal trade. It is believed that wealthy pedophiles with connections are the main buyers, as these children lack official papers. However, it is also mentioned that Ukrainian organs are openly traded, and there are plans to sell Ukrainian migrants' organs to foreigners. The Donbas region is preparing a tribunal to condemn Ukrainian Neo-Nazism and its sponsors. The crimes of the collective West are highlighted and must be stopped.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Russian soldiers are claiming that they've made a hideous discovery inside Ukraine where they say that children between the ages of 27 are being raised in factory farm conditions before the attractive ones are sold as sex slaves to elite pedophiles. And those who don't find buyers are carved up like discarded waste as their organs are harvested and sold for use at European and Israeli transplant centers. In video footage from the front lines of the Russo Ukrainian war, A visibly emotional Russian officer describes children being treated as if they're livestock piglets or rabbits by their Ukrainian captors around the town of Bismarck, where the discovery of a commercial scale child organ harvesting factory was reported. There have previously been more disturbing claims about Ukrainian factory farm children made by Russia. According to the Kremlin, the Kiev regime has been earning 100 of 1,000,000 of dollars per year, by raising children in degrading factory farm conditions and selling them to the highest bidder on the international market. No questions asked. It is understood that most of the buyers are wealthy pedophiles with elite connections. As these children do not have identities or official papers, They are pedophiles' dream because in illegal sense Speaker 1: But Ukrainian organs are openly on Doctor de Lincey claims. In 2021, Bulgaria presented a plan to trade Ukrainian migrants' organs off to foreigners. The customer pays a minimum of $50,000 per kidney. The donor receives between $5,015,000. So it's not only Ukraine. And when it comes to exterminating people, either Ukrainian or Russian, the Donbas is preparing a tribunal And condemnation of Ukrainian Neo Nazism also implies condemnation of its sponsors. The collective West's crimes is long and sad And must be brought to an end.
Saved - August 27, 2025 at 12:10 PM

@ImMeme0 - I Meme Therefore I Am 🇺🇸

These people are truly evil!! In 2018 deposition, the Godfather Of Vaccines, Dr. Stanley Plotkin admits how he and his colleagues harvested organs, hearts, eyes, tongues, etc. from hundreds of fully formed aborted fetuses for use in making their vaccines. https://t.co/Rui0OUp8PG

Video Transcript AI Summary
During cross-examination, Speaker 1 describes fetal tissue work: the Wistar Institute study involving 76 fetuses, all three months or older when aborted and normally developed. Tissues were harvested by coworkers, cut up, and cultured, including pituitary gland, lung, skin, kidney, spleen, and heart (tongue probably). In his career, he says he worked with “quite a few” fetuses, but cannot recall exact numbers. He notes objections to using aborted fetal tissue in vaccines and cites that “The Catholic Church has actually issued a document on that which says that individuals who need the vaccine should receive the vaccines regardless of the fact, and that I I think it implies that I am the individual who will go to hell because of the use of aborted tissues, which I am glad.” Regarding religion, he says “Vaccination is always under attack by religious zealots who believe that the will of God includes death and disease?” and answers “Yes” and “Are you an atheist? Yes.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Your work related to vaccines, how many fetuses have been part of that work? Speaker 1: My own personal work? Two. I'm going to hand Speaker 0: you what's been marked plaintiff's exhibit 41. Okay? Are you familiar with this article, doctor Plotkin? Yes. K. Are you listed as an author on this article? Speaker 1: Yes. K. Speaker 0: This study took place at the Wistar Institute. Correct? Speaker 1: Yes. Speaker 0: You were at the Wistar Institute. Correct? Yes. How many fetuses were used in the study described in this article? Quite a few. So this study involved 74 fetuses, correct? I don't remember exactly how many. Turn to page 12 of the study. Speaker 1: Yeah. 76. Speaker 0: 76. Mhmm. And these fetuses were all three months or older when aborted. Correct? Speaker 1: Yes. Speaker 0: Okay. And these were all normally developed fetuses. Correct? Speaker 1: Yes. Speaker 0: What organs did you harvest from these fetuses? Speaker 1: A: Well, I didn't personally harvest any, but a whole range of tissues were harvested by coworkers. Speaker 0: And were these pieces were then cut up into little pieces. Right? Yes. And they were cultured? Yes. Okay. Some of the pieces of the fetuses were pituitary gland that were that were chopped up into pieces too? Mhmm. Okay. Included the lung of the fetuses? Yes. Okay. Included the skin? Yes. Kidney? Yes. Spleen? Yes. Heart? Yes. And tongue? Speaker 1: I don't recall, but probably yes. Speaker 0: So I Speaker 1: just want to make sure I understand. In in your entire career, and this was just one study. So I'm gonna ask I'm gonna ask Speaker 0: you again. In your entire career, how many fetuses have you worked with? Speaker 1: I don't Proximally. The exact number, but quite a few when we were studying them originally before we decided to use them to make vaccines. Speaker 0: Do you have any sense? I mean, this one study had 76. How many other studies did you have that you used aborted fetuses for? I don't remember how many. You're aware, are you aware that the, one of the objections to vaccination by the plaintiff in this case is the inclusion of aborted fetal tissue in the development of vaccines, and the fact that it's actually part of the ingredients of vaccines? Speaker 1: Yeah. I'm aware of those objections. The Catholic Church has actually issued a document on that which says that individuals who need the vaccine should receive the vaccines regardless of the fact, and that that I I think it implies that I am the individual who will go to hell because of the use of aborted tissues, which I am glad Speaker 0: to do. You know if the mother is Catholic? Speaker 1: I have no idea. Speaker 0: Do you take issue with religious beliefs? Yes. You've said that, quote, vaccination is always under attack by religious zealots who believe that the will of God includes death and disease? Speaker 1: Yes. Do you stand by that statement? I absolutely do. Speaker 0: Okay. Are you an atheist? Yes.
Saved - September 13, 2023 at 1:44 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Big Pharma's dark secret: organ harvesting. They target young adults, especially those aged 15-30. Unconscious patients on ventilators are at risk. Watch the eye-opening video to uncover the truth. Spread the word! #BigPharma #OrganHarvesting

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

The Truth About Big Pharma’s Organ Harvesting EXPOSED. If You Or Anyone You Know Is An Organ Donor YOU NEED TO WATCH THIS “The things I’m telling you, you are not allowed to hear. — You should be upset” “Who’s organs do they want, certainly from all children but from specially the people who are 15 -30. They’re life is in jeopardy, if they’re unconscious and on a ventilator they’re going to get their organs” You NEED TO WATCH This Whole Video

Video Transcript AI Summary
Plants have designated requesters, usually friendly and well-dressed, who befriend the relatives and offer support. This is part of the indoctrination process to procure organs. Organs for transplant can only come from living individuals, not cadavers. The target donors are children and young adults between 15 and 30 years old. The speaker reveals a disturbing practice where overdose victims are given Narcan to bring them to the emergency room, but their lives are not saved. Instead, their organs are harvested. Brain death is determined by lack of consciousness, absence of brain stem reflexes, and a procedure called the apnea test. The speaker warns against doing this test and shares a personal story of a girl who was declared dead but is still alive. Dissecting organs from living individuals is the only way to obtain them; cadavers cannot be used.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Plants. They have a designated requester and, designated requester is usually a very nice person who dresses nice and and be friends. The relatives can I get you a cup of coffee? All I know this has to be terrible on you. We'll do everything we can to help you. And all of that is part of getting them indoctrinated Procurement. To get their, yeah, to get their organs. I need to go to the store. So you cannot get any cannot get any organs from a cadaver. Every organ that's transplanted is a healthy organ and you can only get healthy organs from living persons. You cannot get any organs for transplant from a cadaver. So you don't put it on your license? And the things I'm telling you is that you you are not allowed to hear, and, and because if you hear it, you will be upset as you all 3 of you are upset and rightly so you should be upset because, whose organs do they want? They want the organs from the, from certainly from all children but especially the people who are fifteen to 30 and their life is in jeopardy. If they're unconscious on a ventilator, they're gonna get their organs and they do everything to get their organs. And and, once the organs are taken, you can't bring them back to life. And so that what they do is they tell the relatives, well, you you know, your your your daughter, Sally, would really like to do something good and this is the way to bring something good out of this tragedy and and, for your son. And the while they have been getting organs from accidents and gunshot wounds, they now get more organs from overdose of drugs then they do from accidents and gunshot wounds combined. There are 8 deaths a day from overdose in Ohio and and they they get their organs is is what they want. And and so what are they doing? They're giving the policemen the Narcan to counteract the drug which gets them into the emergency room, but it doesn't save their life. It gets them in the emergency room and they get their organs. And so So diabolically discussed. Oh, it really is. See, it's so bad. In I can't English. Oh my gosh. Yeah. Now just part of part of why I, when you were on talking about unconscious and pain and you might have talked about something else. What I'm encouraging you to do is to realize that that there are common denominators of all of this. The common denominator is that each person is unique and unrepeatable and special. And a person is is alive, but, so are the dogs and cats running around that are alive and so are the trees alive, but they don't have the life that the person has. And each person has that life whether that person can walk or talk or show consciousness. In brain death, they they do only three things for brain dump. 1 is that the the patient does not show consciousness. The patient does not how brain stem reflexes that that involve the eye or the ear. So there's about 14 brain stem reflexes, but they test only 6. They don't test the others. And then the test that they do that, is called the apnea test. It's really not a test, it's a procedure and what they do is take the ventilator away, for 10 minutes and the patient has to demonstrate that they can take a breath in that 10 minutes or that becomes a signal to cut out their organs. During the time they're off the ventilator, the carbon dioxide builds up, the acids build up, that makes the brain swell worse it makes them get worse. So everybody must learn do not do an APNI attempts. You'll almost learn it now and and you have to know it. I hope you never have to use it on your relatives, but you need to learn it. Do not do an apnea test. No one should ever have the procedure of an apnea a test. And then, you have to know that the overdose of drugs, they need time to heal, you know. Right now, and I got a text as I was coming in from the father of a girl in Canada, Takisha, McKinney. You you can Google her if you want, Takisha McKinney. I was I gave I was talking in New York and I was going to New Jersey the next day and they called me and asked me if I would, help with Takesha, so I went to Canada to help her. She overdosed on September 14th. On September 20th, they issued the death certificate on her. She's still very much alive. She moves her feet. She moves her legs. You know, and I mean, I could But she has a death certificate? She has a death certificate. She has a death certificate on September 20th and that this is, December 5th. And She's still alive. She's still alive. Yes. But they but she could have had her organs cut out on September 20th. But by going there put a stop to that. So she was not dissected. Every everybody who, who has their organs taken. They're all dissected alive. There's no organs you can get from a cadaver.
Saved - November 5, 2023 at 6:28 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Dr. Paul A. Byrne, a renowned neonatologist, challenges the concept of "brain death" and urges caution regarding organ donation. He argues that "brain death" is not true death and that organs must come from living individuals. Dr. Byrne highlights the differences between living and dead patients, emphasizing the importance of circulation and respiration. He also criticizes the apnea test, which can worsen a person's condition. Recovery after being declared "brain dead" is possible, according to his personal experience and research.

@catsscareme2021 - Jessica Rojas 🇺🇸💪

Brain Death Is A Lie. Don't Donate Your Organs. Very Disturbing Information - Dr. Paul A. Bryne Brain Death Is A Lie. Every donor is killed in the process, he stated. Revoking your organ donation status from your drivers license is not enough, you must also complete a document of refusal. Dr. Paul A. Byrne is a Board Certified Neonatologist and Pediatrician. He is the Founder of the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit at SSM Cardinal Glennon Children’s Medical Center in St. Louis, MO. He is Clinical Professor of Pediatrics at University of Toledo, College of Medicine. He is a member of the American Academy of Pediatrics and Fellowship of Catholic Scholars. Dr. Byrne is past-President of the Catholic Medical Association (USA), formerly Clinical Professor of Pediatrics at St. Louis University in St. Louis, MO and Creighton University in Omaha, NE. He is author and producer of the film “Continuum of Life” and author of the books “Life, Life Support and Death,” “Beyond Brain Death,” and “Is ‘Brain Death’ True Death?” Dr. Byrne has presented testimony on “life issues” to nine state legislatures beginning in 1967. He opposed Dr. Kevorkian on the television program “Cross-Fire.” He has been interviewed on Good Morning America, public television in Japan and participated in the British Broadcasting Corporation Documentary “Are the Donors Really Dead?” Although the medical profession declares patients “brain dead,” often following an accident, Dr. Byrne insisted there’s no such thing. "Brain death" was false, he said. “Brain death was a lie from the beginning. It has always been a lie. "Brain death" is not true death,” he continued. Organ transplant is the reason you have to have brain death. Dr. Byrne said this term crept into the medical profession following the world’s first heart transplant in 1968. It has since been defined and redefined and is now being replaced by another term known as cardiac death, he noted. He said donated organs, without exception, must come from a living person. Within minutes of “true death,” which, he explained, is the cessation of circulation and respiration, the organs will begin to die. This is why, when organs are removed from a donor, the beating heart is always taken last. You cannot get any organs from cadavers, he noted. If you’re really dead, then no organs can be extracted. He also pointed out the differences between living and dead patients. One example is cooling the body. This slows metabolism in someone who is alive. It slows destruction in a corpse. He said a ventilator, which pushes air into the body, can only be used on someone who’s living, as the person exhales the air. Also, if you cut the skin of someone who’s living, but declared “brain dead,” the wound will heal, something that won’t happen in a dead person. Clearly there’s a difference, said Dr. Byrne. Dr. Bryne went on to describe the damage that can result when doctors perform an “apnea test,” which often sets the stage for organ donation. This is when a ventilator is removed, prematurely, for 10 minutes, to see if a person can breathe on their own. This process, which he called “suffocation,” typically results in the person’s conditioning worsening, he said. Recovery after being declared “brain dead” is also possible according to Dr. Byrne's personal experience and research.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses their experience in neonatology and their belief that brain death is a lie. They claim to have published articles on the subject and have spoken about it extensively. They explain that brain death was invented to make organ transplantation legal and that it does not require brainwave testing. The speaker also mentions that organs are harvested from people who may still be conscious and feel pain, but are medically paralyzed. They compare this practice to what happened in Germany. Overall, they argue that brain death is primarily a way to obtain organs and save money on treating individuals who may not recover.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Okay. Freddy said go. Okay. Speaker 1: Anybody wants restart at the beginning. And, of course, that was only 9 months after I was conceived. Anyway, what, after I started a special care nursery at Cardinal Leonard Children's Hospital in 1963. And we were instrumental in we helped invent ventilator, we invented how to take blood pressure on premature gutted babies. We were the ones that invented nutrition in the vein. We identified the need for magnesium, the need for zinc, the need for copper. And and we did with metabolic beds. We did every every intake taking output and did these things. So we were a leader in the field of neonatology. The hospital still is so clear. The. But then I had a baby in 1975 with flat brainwaves that was said to be brain dead. After. And, it was suggested to stop treating him. I said, well, I don't do that. I treat babies I lived with some guy and kept treating him. And, he did eventually get off the ventilator and he went to school when he got straight a's and after playing baseball, and he's married. He's 3 children. So it's positive him after about 6 months when he continued to live and was doing much better than anybody would have predicted. I started to investigate brain death, And, it it took about 2 years till I understood the language of brain death. Rain death is is a lie. It's it's a a lie that's been pulled over and over again. So people don't even realize it's a lie anymore. But it's been a lie from the beginning, continues to be a lie. So, I have published in in the medical literature. I have an article in the, at, in the Journal of the American Medical Association. I have an article in the Gonzaga Law Review. It's 85 pages. It has 244 footnotes to it. After. And and, because of that, eventually, I have continued to, after, talk about brain death. Brain death is a lie. I have talked all all over the United States. I've, I've talking many countries and and, on on the subject and continued to do it. And that's because of, different things. That's how I got to meet, Ted Foley. I didn't meet him myself, but but through his cousin who, who's a physician and listened to what I had to say as we went to a football game. And she said, you you should know my cousin. So that's how I can get involved with this. But the the truth is easy. And And then once you deviate from the truth, then you have first, it says false, but then when people become conscious of this false, then it's a F. I. It's bringing up this, this alive. The way it occurred was that Christian Bernard did the first heart transplant in South Africa in 1967. 3 days later, they did the 2nd heart transplant. And you don't know where that is, but I'll tell you. It was done in Brooklyn, New York. And what what they did is they cut the beating heart out of a 3 day old baby you transplanted into an 18 day old baby. And at the end of their surgeries, a short time after the end of their surgeries, both of those babies began. It was illegal. It was immoral. And so they had to do something to make it legal. And so what they did is they set up a committee at Harvard, and the committee invented brain damage. The committee did not do studies on dogs or cancer rats. They didn't collect data on human beings. They just invented brain dump. And I had no patient data or no basic science studies. And and and I know it's really awful when you know about it. And it doesn't get better. It keeps getting worse after that then, a lot of people think that brain death means flat brainwaves. They're not even required to do brainwave testing. No way they did that. They they studied 9 patients and 2 of the 9 still had brainwave activity. Then they concluded no longer is it necessary to look at brainwaves. So it's not required to look for brainwave activity. Speaker 0: So when they're doing the the if on people they say are are Speaker 1: that they're all alive. You cannot Speaker 0: So they're harvesting organs out of people who are who are in some way conscious. They just Can't communicate? Speaker 1: Well, consciousness And they feel pain? The consciousness and pain, I encourage you to, to sharpen your mind so that you, stay focused on 1 issue or the other. Speaker 0: Sure. Speaker 1: Okay. And consciousness is important but but, it's one thing, not to demonstrate consciousness, and then we use words like conscious. But unconscious does not mean that there's no consciousness. It just means that we do not observe consciousness. And there's a difference. Speaker 0: So It's it's like subjective Right. Speaker 1: Observation. Whether a purpose whether a person, shows consciousness or not does not indicate whether they're alive or dead. Gotcha. See? And so so, and after. And, you use consciousness. And what else did you use to Speaker 0: Pain that they feel Speaker 2: pain and then they take Speaker 0: the organs out. Speaker 1: The pain is, It's one of those things that's real, and we should pay attention to it. But pain is the way that body the body, knows that something's wrong and it's a way that healing is initiated. Now we live in a world where no one should have any pain. Well, there are some sayings, no pain, no gain. Speaker 0: Right. And and and every Pain free is It's not exactly a good thing. Speaker 1: In fact, the matter is it's a bad thing. So so focus on pain. Now here's what happens. Just because a person can demonstrate pain doesn't mean they don't have pain. You know? A very good example of after, because they they give paralyzing agents, when they take the organs so that they don't they move and they don't squirm. Speaker 0: That's horrible. Speaker 1: And and even if they don't move and don't squirm and they caught on them, their heart rate goes up and their blood pressure goes up, after, which is the response to pain. And but they can't demonstrate that they have pain. Speaker 0: Because they're paralyzed. Medically paralyzed them. Yeah. So they can't respond by. Right. That's horrible. Speaker 1: Horrible. After it gets really bad if you pay attention to it. So in any event, they invented brain dump to mainly to get organs, but then also so so they don't waste money on treating people who aren't ever gonna get a job, who who are just going to live and and and not died. And so, you see, what brain dump is, it's primarily a way to get organs. January. Speaker 0: No. It's no different than what they did in Germany. Speaker 1: That's exactly what they did in Germany. That's exactly what they did in Germany. And and and actually, in my research many years ago, when you had to do the research by going to what we call the stacks in the library to get the old closing the term of the American Medical Association in 1919, 1920 of a doctor in Germany who wrote to, the American Medical Association and telling them what the doctors were doing in Germany. We signed it, the overseas correspondent, and told the doctors in the United States what was going on in Germany, and that was before HIPAA. So so in many ways, what's going on in this country is very similar to
Saved - June 26, 2024 at 10:47 PM

@catsscareme2021 - Jessica Rojas 🇺🇸💪

No wonder why regret Mom's always say "my intuition was screaming at me to stop the injections." This isn't science- it's barbaric and cruel. https://t.co/XCo1AQCTuE

Video Transcript AI Summary
That's my baby. Take a deep breath. Little pinch. You're doing great, mom. Last one. All done.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: That's my baby. Okay. Speaker 1: Okay. Take a deep Speaker 0: breath. Yes. Deep breath. There you go, sweetie. Little pinch. We're sorry. Okay. It's okay, sweetie. It's okay. You are good. You are done. More. You're doing great. You're doing great. I know. You're doing great, mom. Speaker 1: Okay, Max. Okay. Last one here. Speaker 0: Last one. Last one. I'll ask them, guys. All done. All done. Okay. All done. Okay.
Saved - July 31, 2024 at 2:13 PM

@DecentBackup - BackupDecentFiJC

Even though the link won’t load properly now, you’ll wanna remember that CLEVELAND CLINIC was one of the systems that refused to give organs to unvaccinated patients and just let them die instead. That’s gonna become hugely integral to the plot. https://t.co/jatJvTJJ1y

Saved - October 7, 2024 at 6:30 PM

@AreOhEssEyeEe - 🇨🇦Unacceptable Canadian Girl🇨🇦

Canada leads the world in harvesting organs from those who received medically assisted death. Do you get it yet?

@Savage16May - Savage

🚨🚨🚨 PLEASE 🚨🚨🚨 Give me thumbs up if you can see this 👇👇👇 Please comment if you already knew about this . https://t.co/njGmnl3J6n

Saved - October 19, 2024 at 6:21 AM

@Syl_Stormrider - Private Citizen

https://t.co/BjV9fflWo7 I'm not allowed to tell you this...... Are you an Organ Donor? You will want to watch this!!

Saved - December 23, 2024 at 5:31 AM

@JackStr42679640 - Jack Straw

WOW WOW...WATCH IT! Healthcare Medical Intervention is Number 1 Cause of Death in USA FollowsTheWhiteRabbit 🐇 https://t.co/tPs4sknvhq

Video Transcript AI Summary
Medical intervention is a leading cause of death in the United States, claiming around a million lives annually. Many people trust their doctors without realizing that a significant portion of medical education is based on unscientific principles. The current medical system is outdated and needs a complete overhaul. The idea of treating illness with harmful substances is flawed, yet it persists because it generates substantial profits for pharmaceutical companies, which wield significant influence.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Eating cause of death in the United States is medical intervention. Medical intervention kills about a 1000000 people a year. Doctors kill over a 1000000 people a year, and people go to their doctor and think nothing of it. Problem with our medical doctors is that these very good people make the biggest mistake of their life, and they go to medical school. 85% of what they're taught is unscientific nonsense, and then they're cut loose on the general population to practice unscientific nonsense. The medicine we have is now so far behind the science that it is impossible to bring it up to date. We have to take the medicine we have and discard it and start over. Where did we ever get the idea that we can help a sick person if we give them poison? It's a pretty stupid system, but it makes enormous amounts of money, and the drug companies have enormous power.
Saved - January 2, 2025 at 8:14 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I recently came across alarming information regarding a leaked 2018 proposal by Dr. Anthony Fauci, codenamed DEFUSE, which suggests plans for deploying self-spreading vaccines via drones without consent. This raises serious ethical concerns about public health measures and individual rights. Additionally, I learned about horrific practices of organ harvesting from children, particularly in Ukraine, involving government and corporate complicity. We must unite to expose these atrocities, advocate for transparency, and protect the vulnerable. Together, we can fight for truth and justice.

@MediaHubbz - N1NJA🥷⚔️

Leaked 2018 📃 CODENAME: "DEFUSE" 👀❗️ In an age where the battle lines between good and evil are starkly drawn, a disturbing revelation has surfaced about Dr. Anthony Fauci's alleged plans. A leaked 2018 proposal, codenamed DEFUSE, submitted by Fauci's EcoHealth Alliance to DARPA, details a chilling plan to deploy "self-spreading" vaccines using military-grade drones over population centers. This document describes the use of aerosolized immune modulators, chimeric spike proteins, and self-disseminating vaccines for mass "inoculation" of both animals and humans without their consent. The proposal raises significant ethical concerns, particularly around informed consent, as it advocates for technologies that could bypass individual choice in vaccination. The integration of such biotechnology with drone delivery systems hints at a scenario where public health measures could morph into covert military applications. This is further complicated by the historical collaboration between DARPA and Moderna, which had been working on RNA-based vaccines since 2012, including a spike protein sequence patented by Moderna in 2016 that uncannily matches part of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. What else can drones do❓ 🤔 Disruption of Electronics: EMP drones can temporarily disable or destroy electronic circuits within their range, which includes communication systems, navigation equipment, and weapon systems of enemy forces. This capability can be used to neutralize threats without physical destruction, thus reducing collateral damage. Counter-Drone Measures: Drones can be deployed to counter enemy drone swarms by disabling the drones' electronic components, effectively rendering them inoperable. This is particularly useful in scenarios where traditional kinetic methods might not be effective or could lead to significant collateral damage.📷📷 Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (ISR): Even with EMP capabilities, drones can still perform ISR tasks by collecting data through non-electronic means like visual or thermal imaging before or after deploying an EMP. The EMP can then be used to disable enemy surveillance or communication, providing a tactical advantage. Area Denial: By deploying EMPs, military forces can create zones where enemy electronic equipment would be inoperative, thereby controlling the battlefield by limiting the enemy's ability to coordinate or respond effectively. Protection of Assets: Drones with EMP capabilities can be used to protect high-value assets like command centers or airbases from electronic attacks or surveillance by enemy drones. Precision Targeting: Modern EMP drones might come equipped with targeting systems that allow for precise EMP emissions, minimizing unintended effects on friendly forces or civilian infrastructure. Surveillance and Reconnaissance: Drones provide real-time, high-resolution imagery and data from potentially hostile territories without risking human life. They can monitor enemy movements, assess terrain, and gather intelligence on enemy capabilities, allowing for better strategic planning and execution of missions. Target Acquisition: They can identify and track targets for precision strikes, either by guiding manned aircraft or directing other drones or ground forces. This enhances the accuracy of military engagements while minimizing collateral damage. Combat Operations: Armed drones like the MQ-9 Reaper can engage targets directly with missiles or bombs, providing a method of attack or defense that does not require pilots to be in immediate danger. They can also be used for close air support, offering quick response capabilities to ground troops. Logistics and Supply: Drones can deliver supplies, from medical aid to ammunition, to remote or contested areas. This capability is particularly useful for resupplying forward units or in scenarios where traditional supply routes are compromised. Search and Rescue: In situations where locating missing or downed personnel is necessary, drones can cover vast areas quickly, using thermal imaging or other sensors to find individuals in need of rescue. They can also drop survival equipment or provide real-time updates to rescue teams. Electronic Warfare: Beyond EMPs, drones can be used for jamming communications, radar, or other electronic signals, disrupting enemy operations or protecting friendly forces from enemy surveillance.📷 Decoy Operations: Drones can serve as decoys, drawing enemy fire or attention away from other military operations, thereby protecting more valuable assets or creating opportunities for strategic maneuvers. Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear (CBRN): Equipped with specialized sensors, drones can detect and map areas contaminated by hazardous materials, helping to protect troops and civilians from exposure. Psychological Operations: Drones can be used to distribute propaganda materials or broadcast messages in enemy or neutral territories to influence local populations or demoralize enemy forces. Environmental Monitoring: In military contexts, drones can assess the environmental impact of operations, monitor weather conditions, or track changes in terrain that might affect strategy. Question Everything 🤔💭 The timing of these developments, alongside the use of drones for "disinfection" during the COVID-19 crisis, has led to speculation about their true purpose. The covert nature of the DEFUSE project, coupled with allegations of whistleblower suppression and the classification of related research, suggests a possible cover-up that warrants urgent investigation. The drones can handle multiple tasks at the same time... So pay attention and be prepared for anything. This scenario underscores how we are living in times where the distinction between good and evil is more critical than ever. The potential misuse of biotechnology for non-consensual mass vaccination represents a profound ethical breach. It is imperative for us to collectively resist such practices by saying "NO" to biological vaccines deployed in this manner. Call to all Digital Soldiers: We must unite to educate, inform, and awaken the public consciousness. Our role is to challenge these narratives, promote transparency, and advocate for personal freedom and consent in all medical interventions. This fight is not just about resisting; it's about actively working towards a future where ethical practices in science and medicine are non-negotiable. We The People will always fight for the truth! In the end #God always wins! #WWG1WGA 🥷🫡⚔️ https://thepeoplesvoice.tv/leaked-docs-expose-faucis-plan-to-spray-self-spreading-vaccines-on-population-centers-by-drone/

Leaked Docs Expose Fauci's Plan to Spray 'Self-Spreading' Vaccines on Population Centers by Drone A recently leaked proposal from 2018 has cast new light on Dr. Anthony Fauci's plan to covertly spray "self-spreading" vaccines on large population centers. thepeoplesvoice.tv

@MediaHubbz - N1NJA🥷⚔️

Connect the dots 🥷 https://t.co/ZRcI6bEt79

@MediaHubbz - N1NJA🥷⚔️

Organ Harvesting on Children: The Dark Reality OPEN YOUR EYES! Watch the series of videos below 👇 Organ harvesting, particularly from children, has been exposed as one of the most heinous crimes against humanity, involving government entities, NGOs, and Elites in a web of corruption and exploitation. Alive Organ Donors: There are disturbing reports that organs are being harvested from individuals, including children, who are still alive under the guise of the "brain death" concept. This practice violates ethical medical standards and human rights, essentially treating individuals as commodities for the organ market. Involvement of Government, NGOs, and Elites: Ukraine: has become a focal point for organ harvesting, particularly from children. MEP Marcel de Graff has highlighted Ukraine's involvement in child trafficking, organ harvesting, and even the creation of "child kennels" with surrogate mothers for these horrific purposes. This comes alongside accusations of the country being a center for money laundering and sex trafficking. Legislation and Policy: In 2022, Ukrainian law 5610 was passed, allowing organ exports, which former acting health minister Ulyana Suprun facilitated. This law has raised concerns as it appears to permit organ harvesting from various institutions like hospitals, prisons, military units, and orphanages without the consent of individuals under their care.📷 International Corporations: There are claims that major corporations like The Coca-Cola Company are involved in purchasing children from Ukraine for organ harvesting purposes. However, these allegations need further substantiation due to their gravity and the implications they carry. Western Involvement: The situation in Ukraine has been discussed in terms of international criminality, with calls for the prosecution of high-level figures like President Zelensky for alleged crimes against children. The narrative suggests an orchestrated, international network where elites and government officials are complicit. The Global Scale: Human Trafficking Networks: The scale of child trafficking for organs extends beyond Ukraine, with concerns about children crossing borders in the U.S., where systems like HHS, CPS, and various adoption and foster care agencies might be complicit in these networks. The situation at the U.S. border with unaccompanied minors has sparked questions about their safety and the potential for exploitation.📷 Political Complicity: There's critique aimed at political figures and policies, especially regarding open border policies and their alleged connection to child trafficking and organ harvesting. The mention of large numbers of children unaccounted for annually underscores the magnitude of the issue. The Fight for Truth and Justice: As Anon Digital Soldiers, we are committed to uncovering and spreading the truth about these atrocities. The reality of organ harvesting from children is not a conspiracy but a disturbing fact that demands immediate action, transparency, and justice. We will not rest until: Every child involved is saved and accounted for. Those responsible, from government officials to corporate elites, are brought to justice. Global policies are reformed to protect the most vulnerable from such exploitation. We stand firm in our resolve: No more sitting on the fence! You can NO longer ignore crimes against children. Together, we will ensure these truths are known, and justice is served for the innocent. Now start doing your research on Dr Faucci [CONNECT THE DOTS] Share this information, help wake others around you, so we can shine the light on these demons! Stay strong and help me slay these demons. In the end #God always wins #SAVETHECHILDREN #WWG1WGA 🥷⚔️

Video Transcript AI Summary
Tissue procurement involves dissection to obtain requested tissues from intact fetuses. The status of the fetus, including heartbeat, can vary. Some hearts may beat independently even if not part of an intact body. Discussions reveal challenges in obtaining tissues, with some competitors opting to isolate and sell vials instead of providing whole specimens. In Nigeria, a man confessed to luring and killing individuals for their body parts, revealing a syndicate involved in human trafficking. Meanwhile, Kenya is developing a legal organ donation program to address the shortage of kidney donors. The Kenya Tissue and Transplant Authority is drafting regulations to facilitate organ harvesting from deceased patients, aiming to ensure ethical practices and equitable allocation of organs. The initiative seeks to educate the public on the importance of organ donation to save lives.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: How does a tissue procurement occur in one of these situations when the entire fetus is intact in the lab? Speaker 1: We do dissection. Speaker 0: And and just to be clear, you do dissection to obtain the tissues that are on the list for the day? Speaker 1: We do dissection to get tissues that the researchers have requested. Yeah. K. Speaker 0: They they are, I mean, they have a a heartbeat, don't they, at the point they would fall out? Speaker 2: You know, objection. This witness isn't in the room when that happens. This witness is not a doctor. This witness is not here to testify about the medical or biological conditions of the fetus when it comes when it's eliminated from the the mother. Speaker 0: And by not alive, do you mean that, they were not moving? Speaker 1: Correct. Speaker 0: And and do you mean that they did not have a heartbeat? Speaker 1: It would depend. Speaker 0: K. And when you say it would depend, what do you mean? Speaker 1: There are I can see hearts that are in not in an intact, POC that are beating independently. Speaker 3: Hi. Hi. Hi. Hi. Hi. Hi. Hi. Hi. Hi. Hi. Hi. Hi. Hi. Hi. Hi. Hi. Hi. Hi. Hi. Hi. Speaker 4: Hi. Hi. Hi. Hi. Hi. Hi. Hi. Hi. Hi. Hi. Hi. Hi. Hi. Hi. Hi. Hi. Hi. Hi. Hi. Hi. Hi. Hi. Hi. Speaker 5: I don't mind that. You know what? Speaker 3: I don't mind. So you'll be seeing Speaker 4: so you'll be meeting. So you know how you you know how you, that Paul? Speaker 6: Yes. Speaker 4: Anne is actually the one that they went to the lake 3 and a half days out of the week. Okay. So see. So she's Okay. So you Speaker 3: see each other. Speaker 4: You know, the one who's in charge like, Paul is an overall medical director being to your affiliate, but I kind of run the 3rd floor, the the abortion service. Yeah. So Okay. So if once we, like, get our relationship established, it will actually be And that you will Speaker 3: be seeing more of. You have to Speaker 4: go and play with our tissue. Okay. See if it's cool enough for you. Speaker 5: I like tissues. We have I like Speaker 3: the shoes. Speaker 4: We have Speaker 5: a lot of it. Okay. Speaker 3: You see? I'm here. Speaker 5: So more for me to check. Speaker 4: Can you just because, you know, it's not busy. I get Speaker 3: a truck. So I have 2 providers who go up to 24 weeks, and Anne is one of the providers. And I'm so Speaker 5: See, like, there's people right now, most of the people, like ABRs, that was some of our competitors. They're not even selling this issue. They're like, oh, we'll give you an isolation. And we're like, well, why can't I get it? And they're like, well, because it's such a demand right now, it's more profitable for us to isolate it and sell you the vials rather than give you the entire petition. You said, are Speaker 4: you serious? Funny because ever since I think I will feel like I'm 6 months or a year, I need to read up the proposition. Speaker 3: And so Speaker 4: now every time I join Danny Danny, I'm like, oh, there's so long. Yeah. Speaker 3: You already know. And, like, I can, like, I'm like, if I can do I'm Speaker 4: to hurry up. Whereas, like, other other days, it's, like, more intact where it's, like, maybe only, like, an arm that's I would imagine other days, it's, like, more intact where it's, like, maybe only, like, an arm that I would imagine most weeks Thursday, Friday, Saturday. Yeah. Anyone can do it. I've been told to for the week. See? And just for the Thursday, Friday, Thursday. Oh. Typical. Speaker 3: And that's what I was telling you. Like, we like, Speaker 4: Because it was a beetle anomaly, for a long time that you're going to win. I was like, I'm sorry we put formula in there. So it's all like dark white. Yeah. It's not clear. It's not like something you can see. And he was, oh. And Speaker 1: We were told to feed him well before killing him. That's a confession from a suspect who said he lured and killed his friend and sold his body parts. Senior correspondent Ivy Kano reports. Speaker 7: For weeks now, the Lagos police command headquarters has not held any parade of suspects. Now there are stories and there are crime stories. What you're about to hear is mind boggling. It's a story of a well coordinated syndicate, what our call merchants of human parts. The attend the police have arrested so far. He used to be a cemetery attendant, but due to increasing demand for fresh human parts, Ademola had to diversify into luring, killing, and selling fresh human parts. Speaker 8: Once it is been buried, we call it to try. Either it is still cold, it is still since I'm not the one that murdered the person, it's not life killing. It was buried already, so we call it dry. And I was in, okay. There was a local bad day. I did go there to drink. Normally, they've known me. I do travel there consistently since about 4, 5 years. Again, the guy now met me maybe a week to the time I'm coming back to Lagos. That, let me go to Lagos with you. You guys are okay. So, actually, I saw the opportunity because they've ordered already. So I called. Someone is coming to Lagos. The order was woman head, the heart, the hand, and not yeah. Personally, the leg, but not always. We're drinking. The guy was taking the cigarettes because he drinks a lot. So I don't know how they want to come, how they want to do the work. So so he he he went maybe 12 footstep ahead of where we are and placed the 4 piece of canal down. And immediately, the guy picked the polar knots, turning back. The man shot. Looked more immediately, and he died on the spot. So I went to 30 or so when we started working, cutting and dismembered the bird in and everything. I picked what's what they ordered. The head, the hearts, the left hand, left hand. The baba have taken have taken on the left hand and blood. Baba and Balogun. It's my friend. They they put the what's it called? The other part into 2, Batukism. Which one? They said, which one am I taking? And I said, I can't pack everything. If I need anything, I will cover. Maybe we'll meet. Speaker 7: He said they have so far killed 2 people. Speaker 8: The only person I can say maybe I regret is. But I can say he's a boy. Has even given me one path when I travel to Okiyo, which I met him around. Speaker 7: He revealed a king contracted them to kill his son so he could use his body parts. Speaker 8: It's just okay. He said no. He needs the edge. In fact, everything in Talibol is going to pick well. Speaker 7: He said Alhaji is a receiver, and his huge demand for human parts puts Ademola under pressure. Speaker 8: What you we we we we recovered from mama's house. Speaker 3: Is it someone that will use that thing Speaker 8: to that extent? My man knows everything. Speaker 7: Police say people should be cautious about who they associate with. Speaker 9: People should be careful the kind of jobs they accept. This person was asked to come and work on a pig farm. So people need to be extra careful and let somebody know where you're going to. Speaker 7: The police are also after most suspects in connection with the gang. Ivy Kano. CBC News, Lagos. Speaker 10: Now the country may soon have a legally adopted organ donation program that has rules to guide the process and will expand the possible sources of donor organs. Now the Kenya Tissue and Transplant Authority has formed a National Tissue and Organ Transplant Technical Committee, which is drafting regulations, standards, and guidelines that will allow such an organ donation program. Now the program will see organs harvested from dead patients to save the lives of patients whose organs have failed. Well, Kenya Tissue and Transplant Authority acting director doctor Nduku Quilonzo says this will see a shift from the perennial reliance on family donation practices, which have proven to be unreliable. Francis Mtellake reports. Speaker 11: Speaking at the 4 day Kenya Renal Association Conference in Mombasa, Kenya Tissue and Transplant Authority acting director, doctor Nduku Kilonzo, said the country is facing a shortage of kidney donors leading to many Kenyans losing their lives and some incurring huge medical bills weekly in undergoing dialysis. Speaker 12: We have to find a way of starting to get kidneys and other organs from people who have died. And to be able to do that or who what we call deceased donor programs. To be able to do that, we must have regulations. Kenyans must understand why it is important. Where there are legal issues around, who determines death and who then retrieves the organs and where the transplantation is done in order to ensure that there is no conflict of interest. But importantly, there is equity in our location of those kidneys when they are found. Speaker 6: Many of our donors are unhealthy. We also have diseases that are running in families that precludes some people from donating, and of course, the issues of blood group. So to go around all these, we need to get another pool of donors, a pool that is devoid of those issues. Speaker 11: The Kenya Tissue and Transplant Authority has formed a national tissue and organ transplant technical committee and is in the process of drafting a number of regulations, standards, and guidelines that will allow an organ donation program and seek kidneys from dead patients harvested to save life of patients whose kidneys and other organs have failed. Speaker 12: Organ allocation criteria. Who is due for the next available organ? We must have regulations around the facilities, which hospital, and what kind of hospital can do a transplant, and can transplant an organ from one human being to another, because you want people who are competent, who are certified if you're going to get the best outcomes. Speaker 6: What you are saying, there are people who unfortunately will be brain dead for whatever reason. Maybe they have got a massive stroke or maybe they've gotten a road traffic accident and they will not leave, and they will definitely pass on. What you are saying, brain death is equals to death. Speaker 11: According to the authority, cases targeted for the donor program are patients who may have died in an accident or have been recently removed from life support in hospital with the consent of the family. The authority says the regulations are also focusing on standards and unlawful organ harvesting and conflict of interest. Speaker 6: Once doctors make a diagnosis of brain death and the person who is brain dead has got healthy organs, then such organs should then be brought forward or be, transplanted on a living person. Because if they die, then they'll go with their organs. Speaker 11: By December this year, the draft bill will be ready with the team asking parliamentarians to support their move. Speaker 12: Can we educate Kenyans better? Can we get Kenyans to be able to, come out and become ambassadors for donation? Those especially those that, have benefited because I think that is what will start us on the journey. Every single journey of a 1000 steps starts with 1 step. And the first step is education, knowledge, and then get more and more people to become part of the movement. Speaker 11: Kenya Renewal Association President Doctor. John Giggis says Kenya is grappling with a shortage of kidney donors, a situation brought by underlining factors like health complications, mismatching blood groups, and other family related diseases. The cost of dialysis session and other cost infections currently stand at 76,000 shillings a month. Doctors say this will be reduced to 42,000 per month when patients undergo a successful kidney transplant. Francis Mtellaki, Citizen TV, Mombasa. Speaker 3: Next Speaker 12: speaker. Next speaker. Next speaker. Can I invite, madam?
Saved - January 6, 2025 at 11:22 PM

@iluminatibot - illuminatibot

The real truth about organ donations This is terrifying https://t.co/ORVgIX86KT

Video Transcript AI Summary
Brain death is a fabricated concept primarily created to facilitate organ donation. It allows for the procurement of healthy organs from living individuals, as organs cannot be harvested from cadavers. The idea is controversial and often hidden from public knowledge, as it raises ethical concerns. Those labeled as brain dead still have functioning hearts and circulation, which contradicts the notion of being truly dead. The focus is often on younger individuals, particularly those aged 16 to 30, who may be in critical condition and on life support. The implications of this practice are troubling and warrant deeper scrutiny.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Brain death is is a lie. So people don't even realize it's a lie anymore. But it's been a lie from the beginning, continues to be a lie. They invented brain death to mainly to get organs, but then also so they don't waste money on treating people who aren't ever gonna get a job, who who are just going to live and and not die. And so to see what brain death is, it's primarily a way to get organs, cannot get any organs from a cadaver. Every organ that's transplanted is a healthy organ and you can only get healthy organs from living persons, Cannot get any organs for transplant from a cadaver. The things I'm telling you is that you are not allowed to hear because if you hear it, you will be upset as you all 3 of you are upset, then rightly so, you should be upset. Whose organs do they want for certainly from all children, but especially the people who are 16 to 30 and their life is in jeopardy. If they're unconscious and on a ventilator, they're gonna get their organs. Everybody who's called brain dead has a beating heart circulation and respiration. If they didn't have that, wouldn't have to call them brain dead. You can call them dead.
Saved - May 4, 2025 at 3:14 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I came across a lawsuit alleging that New York hospitals are harvesting organs from patients before they are actually dead. Patrick McMahon, a former transplant coordinator, claims that about one in five patients may still show signs of brain activity when declared dead. He believes that financial pressures lead hospitals to hastily declare brain death to free up bed space, while the donor network profits significantly from organ sales. McMahon, who was fired for speaking out, emphasizes the monetary incentives involved in this practice.

@toobaffled - “Sudden And Unexpected”

New York hospitals are routinely 'harvesting' organs from patients before they're even dead, an explosive lawsuit is claiming. (Older Story) "Plaintiff, Patrick McMahon, 50, (Pictured) reckons one in five patients is showing signs of brain activity when surgeons declare them dead and start hacking out their body parts. 'They're playing God,' said McMahon, a former transplant coordinator who claims he was fired just four months into the role for speaking out about the practice. He said that the donor network makes 'millions and millions' from selling the organs they obtain to hospitals and to insurance companies for transplants. 'Hearts, lungs, kidneys, joints, bones, skin graphs, intestines, valves, eyes -- it's all big money,' he said. The Air Force Combat veteran and former nurse added that financially strained hospitals are easily influenced to declare a patient brain dead because they're keen to free up bed space.” https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2208896/Patrick-McMahon-lawsuit-Donor-network-pressured-medics-declare-patients-dead-organs-harvested.html?fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAAR4Lh0wcXoPE6K8bcg3D6CQBy7DY35Rr_qvJ0WK7bbtPgiKvtahjPt3OMDlMxQ_aem_Bg6A1d2RBmW2HcfN6o6b0A#

'This kid is dead, you got that?' Donor network 'pressured medics to declare patients dead so organs can be harvested' A lawsuit, filed by former staff member Patrick McMahon yesterday, accuses transplant nonprofit The New York Organ Donor Network of bullying doctors into declaring patients brain dead when they are still alive so their body parts can be harvested. dailymail.co.uk
Saved - May 13, 2025 at 8:43 AM

@RichardEntuboca - Richard Entuboca

Israelis get placed atop organ donors lists all over the world, folks. It’s factored into AI platforms they’re developing to determine if you’re more “valuable” to them alive or dead. Srsly. Anthem AI: UJA/BCBS/UnitedHealth/AIG Ruth Raskas Eitan Hyam Israeli Ministry of Health

@Use_Yandex - Use Yandex Search Engine for Anti Zionist searches

Perhaps an Israeli needed that organ. It's selfish and Anti Semitic to not give up that organ. https://t.co/zJXUqYmlFw

Video Transcript AI Summary
A travel nurse claims Israelis can come to the US for free medical procedures, including organ donations, with flights and hospital stays paid. She alleges that if a US hospital offers something better than in Israel, or if they need an organ, Israelis can receive American organ donations for free, while Americans could face $70,000 in medical bills for the same. She states that half of the patients on one floor were often Israeli and that one patient received a heart and lung transplant within a week of arriving in the US, while Americans may wait years. She questions how Americans struggle to pay for healthcare while Israelis receive free healthcare in both Israel and the US, especially since US tax money supports both countries' healthcare systems.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Come to The US and receive our organs. Okay. This is actually insane. I don't think we'll realize how connected The US and Israel are. Not only does US give Israel Billions Of Dollars every year that helps fund their free health care. Meanwhile Americans do not receive free health care in The US, but that was just a travel nurse who worked on an organization floor in The US. And she said that what she learned, like, through her experience working on that floor was that Israelis can come to The US for free and receive any medical procedure if the hospital in The US is better or offer something that they can't get in Israel, or if they need an organ donation, they can receive American organ donations and they can come to The US and everything's paid for. Their flights paid for, their hospital stay, their medical procedure, everything is free. Meanwhile, if an American were to get an organ donation, it could cost them $70,000 in medical bills for being in the hospital, but an Israeli will get it for free. And she also said that at any given time, this floor would be half Israelis at this hospital. And she thinks that Israelis might be fast tracked because she talked to one patient who had a heart and a lung transplant. And within a week of being in The US, she was getting her donation. Meanwhile, like Americans could be on this list for years to wait for a match or wait to get a transplant. Like, that's just this is just insane. It's crazy to me that Americans are struggling to pay for health care, but Israelis can come and get medical procedures for free. Like, how does that make any sense? When Americans are paying their taxes and that money is going towards their health care system as well as Israel's health care system, how can Israelis get free health care in Israel and The US? How how does that make any sense?

@iluminatibot - illuminatibot

"You're trying to take my son off of life support and take his organs." Mother records hospital staff attempting to remove her son from life support in order to take his organs without her consent.

Video Transcript AI Summary
A woman demands to speak with whoever is in charge of Overland Park Regional Medical Center, claiming the hospital is trying to take her son off life support and harvest his organs against his and the family's wishes. She states that all the parents are present and have said no to organ removal. She also mentions attorneys who have allegedly said the procedure is permissible. The woman insists her son would not have wanted his organs removed and that she signed paperwork indicating he is not an organ donor. She repeatedly asks to speak with the director or whoever is in charge of the hospital and requests confirmation that her request is being denied.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: To speak with whoever's in charge of this hospital. Ma'am, I need to speak with whoever's in charge. You're trying to take my son off a life report and take his organs, and I ask for whoever's in charge. I ask for the director. I need to speak to the director. I need to speak to whoever's over Larry, ma'am. Okay. I'm asking you to speak to whoever's over Overland Park Regional Medical Center. I am sending this to the news. I've asked you not to take my son off. I swear my son would have not wanted his organs removed. All of us, all parents are here. We said no. We said no. Then Ma'am, please Ma'am. Can I get the director unfortunately? Whoever is over Olin Park Regional you just told me no, ma'am. Can you tell me no on this phone again? Tell me no again. I am happy to find someone to bring No. I want to talk to who is ever in charge of this hospital. Okay. This hospital. Okay. And the attorneys that is sitting to saying that this is okay. That you said that they said this is okay. I want I want ma'am, I I am having the drummers' license be did not want that. I signed with somebody. The gifts that he's not he's not giving them. Have to say? Yes. Can you go give whoever's in charge? Thank you.
Saved - June 22, 2025 at 11:11 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe that brain death is a fabricated concept designed primarily to facilitate organ harvesting. Many people are unaware that this definition was created to justify taking organs from those who are unconscious and on ventilators, particularly young individuals aged 16 to 30. I argue that every so-called "brain dead" person still has a beating heart and is alive. My conviction stems from my experiences, especially with a patient named Joseph, who was declared brain dead but ultimately made a full recovery. This has fueled my ongoing battle against the brain death definition in the U.S.

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

"Brain Death Is A Lie. It's Been A Lie From The Beginning & Continues To Be A Lie." Dr Paul Byrne, MD Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine "People Don't Know Brain Death Was Invented To Get Organs." "Those Who Are 16 to 30, Unconscious & On A Ventilator...Their Lives Are In Jeopardy." "They Invented Brain Death To Get Organs & Also So Money Isn't Wasted Treating People Who Aren't Ever Going To Get A Job, Who Are Just Going To Live & Not Die." Brain death is primarily a way to get organs. You cannot get any organs from a cadaver. Every organ that's transplanted is a healthy organ. You can only get healthy organs from living persons. You cannot get any organs for a transplant from a cadaver. You are not allowed to hear these truths because if you hear it, you'll be upset. And rightly so, you should be upset. Whose organs do they want? Certainly from all the children, but especially the people who are 16 to 30. Their life is in jeopardy. If they're unconscious & on a ventilator they're going to get their organs. Everybody who's called "brain dead" has a beating heart, circulation & respiration. If they didn't have that, wouldn't have to call them "brain dead", you can call them dead. Dr Paul Byrne: Dr. Byrne became a pioneering neonatologist in the 1960s. His work in neonatology improved the practice of medicine worldwide. His conviction to defend life became his all-consuming passion. In 1975, Dr. Byrne treated Joseph, a prematurely born baby, who was declared brain dead but Dr Byrne believed he was alive & refused to disconnect his ventilator. Joseph made a full recovery & is now grown, married & has 3 children of his own. Joseph motivated Dr. Byrne to begin the long battle to oppose brain death as a definition of death in the United States. 👇The Brain Death Fallacy👇 https://a.co/d/7TSlwHB 👇Harvesting Organs & Cherishing Life👇 https://a.co/d/cIhwZfg Speaker: Dr Paul Byrne, MD

Video Transcript AI Summary
Brain death is a lie invented to harvest organs and avoid the expense of treating non-productive individuals. Organs for transplant must come from living persons, not cadavers. This information is suppressed because it would upset people. Those aged 16 to 30, especially if unconscious and on a ventilator, are at risk of organ harvesting. Individuals declared brain dead have a beating heart, circulation, and respiration; otherwise, they would simply be considered dead.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Brain death is is a lie. So people don't even realize it's a lie anymore, but it's been a lie from the beginning, continues to be a lie. They invented brain death to mainly to get organs, but then also so they don't waste money on treating people who aren't ever gonna get a job, who who are just going to live and and not die. And so to see what brain death is, it's primarily a way to get organs. Cannot get any organs from a cadaver. Every organ that's transplanted is a healthy organ, and you can only get healthy organs from living persons. You cannot get any organs for transplant from a cadaver. The things I'm telling you is that you you are not allowed to hear because if you hear it, you will be upset as you all three of you are upset, and rightly so, you should be upset. Whose organs do they want? Certainly from all children, but especially the people who are 16 to 30, and their life is in jeopardy. If they're unconscious and on a ventilator, they're gonna get their organs. Everybody who's called brain dead has a beating heart circulation and respiration. If they didn't have that, you wouldn't have to call them brain dead. You could call them dead.
Saved - July 11, 2025 at 1:41 AM

@myhiddenvalue - Not A Number

"Brain death" is a lie they use for organ harvesting. https://t.co/Nhq0oWZkmW

Video Transcript AI Summary
Organs cannot be taken from cadavers because brain cells die within minutes of oxygen deprivation. A person is not dead if their heart is beating, they are metabolizing fluids, or having bowel movements. Brain death is a lie manufactured for eugenics, to facilitate organ harvesting. The best organ donors are 30 years old, with a beating heart, circulation, and on a ventilator. The decision to take organs is made early, as treatment to preserve organs differs from life-saving treatment. In the UK, everyone is an organ donor unless they opt out. When a 999 call is made, the system assesses the caller's medical history, tax contributions, and worth to determine if they receive life-saving treatment or are considered an organ donor. This system is eugenics.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: First of all, you cannot take an organ from a dead body, from a cadaver. Within three minutes of no oxygen, you're going to start damaging brain cells, and within five minutes, you're gonna have cellular death. You have got to be alive to take your organs. That's the end of it. You're not dead. There's no such thing as brain dead. Brain death. If your heart is beating, if you are metabolizing fluids, if you are metabolizing a liquid feed, a soya feed, which they give you and you're having bowel movements, you are not dead. You're not dead. It's a lie. They're talking about the brain stem where you've got the hypothalamus, the center that controls your blood pressure, your heartbeat, but the rest, you're not dead. It's a lie. It was a lie that was manufactured so that they could do their eugenics, taking organs from one person to the next. Who makes the best organ donor? 30 with a beating heart, a circulation, and ideally on a ventilator. When is the decision made to take your organs very early on, probably before you are even aware what they are doing? Because the treatment to preserve your organs is very different to the treatment to save your life. In The UK on the May 22, everybody became an organ donor unless you opt out. People do not know. So the minute that you make that 999 phone call, everything's up there on the screen. They know who you are. This is why they want you on a digital system. Your entire medical history is going to be fed through AI, how much tax you pay, what you're worth to the system, and that's going to come up with whether you're a yay or a nay. Are you getting life saving treatment, or are you on end of life care? What age are you? Are you then for organ donor? This is very important that people know this. And so you have to ask, what is this? It's eugenics. It's eugenics.
Saved - July 23, 2025 at 10:52 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I have spent 13 years as an intensive care RN, and I find organ procurement companies to be deeply troubling. Hospitals mandate that nurses contact these companies when patients meet specific criteria, even if they have expressed a desire not to be organ donors. I feel sick having to call these companies and witness them pressuring families to consent to organ harvesting while their loved ones are still alive and fighting for their lives.

@TaraO318368 - Don't Tread On Momma 🇺🇸🐍

I have worked as an intensive care RN for the last 13 years. These organ procurement companies are pure evil. Hospitals REQUIRE nurses to contact these companies if patients meet certain criteria even if they have wishes to NOT be an organ donor. These companies come in and try to hustle families to consent to this on the patient's behalf. It made me sick to call the companies and watch them through the glass windows trying to get these families to agree to harvest the organs of their loved one who was still alive fighting for their life.

Saved - July 23, 2025 at 4:40 AM

@lreneemacbaird - Lucia 💧 🔥

@SecKennedy There is no such thing as brain death. https://t.co/wAcZdCVJ7L

Saved - July 27, 2025 at 11:40 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I am deeply troubled by the findings of a recent investigation into the organ transplant system, which revealed that over 28 patients were alive when organ harvesting surgeries began. The case of Anthony Thomas Hoover highlighted alarming practices by organ procurement organizations, where patients showing signs of life were subjected to procedures that some staff likened to euthanasia. The investigation uncovered serious issues with how circulatory death is determined, raising ethical concerns about the classification and timing of organ donations. This situation demands urgent reform.

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

More Than 28 Patients Were Still Alive When Organ Harvesting Surgery Began. RFK Jr & HHS Find Systemic Disregard For Sanctity Of Life In Organ Transplant System: "Hospitals allowed the organ procurement process to begin when patients showed signs of life & this is horrifying!" July 21, 2025— The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) under the leadership of Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. announced a major initiative to begin reforming the organ transplant system following an investigation that revealed disturbing practices by a major organ procurement organization. The investigation was prompted by the troubling case of Anthony Thomas Hoover, 36, hospitalized four years ago in Kentucky for a drug overdose. He was unresponsive for two days & his family consented to remove life support so his organs could be harvested, after being approached & counseled by an organ procurement organization (OPO). Network For Hope, the OPO, began the process of procuring his organs even though Anthony seemed to be improving. He then awoke & began “thrashing on the bed” & was subsequently sedated. Hospital staff became “uncomfortable with the amount of reflexes” the patient was exhibiting & some began to call his organ procurement procedure “euthanasia,” though representatives of the OPO procurement group told them it was not. One Physician finally stopped the surgery & Hoover survived, albeit with malicious damage already done. Investigations revealed 103 patients not classified properly, 73 patients who were neurologically alive & more than 28 patients were alive when organ procurement surgery began. The HHS investigation revealed that some OPOs actively seek cardiac, or circulatory, death donors rather than brain death ones. The classification of circulatory death involves patients who are typically comatose & on life support. These individuals retain brain function but are deemed unlikely to recover based on medical assessments, which can involve the subjective judgment of the doctors. A coma patient or someone on a ventilator who is fully alive within, can be pronounced as "cardiac or circulatory death" & organs harvested to be sold for transplants. There are serious questions surrounding organ donations that result from the determination of circulatory death, or called “cardiac determination.” There is no uniform time clinicians must wait after the heart stops. Hospitals establish the amount of time that can pass before clinicians can determine someone has circulatory death, generally around five minutes. In some of these cases, “the extraction of the organs is actually the cause of death” for the patient. About 20,000 organs last year were procured after a patient was said to have undergone circulatory death, representing one-third of all donations in the U.S. This figure is 3X higher than it was five years ago, reflecting a rising reliance on this method. 👇How To Opt Out Of Organ Donation In US👇 https://donatelife.net/donation/donor-registries/removing-yourself-from-a-donor-registry/ 👇HHS & RFK Jr Press Release👇 https://www.hhs.gov/press-room/hrsa-to-reform-organ-transplant-system.html 👇Organ Donation Cardiac Death Controversy👇 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1556793108000491#:~:text=Persistent%20barriers%20to%20donation%20continue,the%20continuation%20of%20DCD%20practices Speaker: @KateShemirani Video: @Wellness_Radar

Video Transcript AI Summary
There is no such thing as brain death; if your heart is beating, you are not dead. This concept was manufactured to facilitate eugenics through organ harvesting. Organs cannot be taken from cadavers because brain cells are damaged within minutes of oxygen deprivation. The best organ donors are under 30, with a beating heart, circulation, and on a ventilator. The decision to take organs is made early, possibly before the patient is aware, because organ preservation treatment differs from life-saving treatment. In the UK, everyone is an organ donor unless they opt out. When a 999 call is made, the system accesses medical history, tax records, and other data to determine if the person receives life-saving treatment or is considered an organ donor based on age and other factors. This is eugenics.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There's no such thing as brain dead, brain death. If your heart is beating, you're not dead, it's a lie, you're not dead, it's a lie, it was a lie that was manufactured so that they could do their eugenics, taking organs from one person to the next. First of all, you cannot take an organ from a dead body, from a cadaver, within three minutes of no oxygen, you're going to start damaging brain cells and within five minutes, you're gonna have cellular death, you have got to be alive to take your organs, that's the end of it, you're not dead. Who makes the best organ donor? Under 30 with a beating heart, a circulation and ideally on a ventilator, When is the decision made to take your organs? Very early on, probably before you are even aware what they are doing because the treatment to preserve your organs is very different to the treatment to save your life. In The UK on the May 22, everybody became an organ donor unless you opt out, people do not know, so the minute that you make that 999 phone call, everything's up there on the screen, they know who you are, this is why they want you on a digital system. Your entire medical history is going to be fed through AI, how much tax you pay, what you're worth to the system and that's going to come up with whether you're a yay or a nay, Are you getting life saving treatment or are you on end of life care? What age are you? Are you then for organ donor? This is very important that people know this, and so you have to ask what is this? It's eugenics. It's eugenics.
Removing Yourself From a Donor Registry We understand that you are considering removing your donor registration. In case you have questions about organ, eye and tissue donation, please read our frequently asked questions. If you registered through your local motor vehicle department Please go to your state’s online registry to update or remove your donor registration. You can find your state’s online […] donatelife.net
Controversies in Organ Donation: Donation After Cardiac Death An ever-increasing disparity between the demand for vital organs for transplantation and the number of available donors presents challenges to the med… sciencedirect.com
Saved - July 31, 2025 at 2:40 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
In 2021, I was pronounced brain dead in Kentucky and prepped for organ donation. Miraculously, I woke up during a cardiac test, visibly distressed, yet was still taken for an "Honor Walk" to the OR. Two doctors halted the procedure, and the surgery was canceled. Now, three years later, whistleblowers have come forward, prompting federal investigations. This situation raises serious questions about the concept of "brain death" and its implications for organ harvesting. If you're considering opting out as a donor, you can update your status through the National Donate Life Registry or your local DMV.

@BabyD1111229 - 0️⃣BlackBetty ⚓️

A Kentucky man declared brain dead woke up during organ harvest prep — and survived. In 2021, TJ Hoover was pronounced brain dead at Baptist Health in Richmond, KY, and prepped for organ donation. But during a cardiac test, he woke up, thrashing and visibly crying. Staff still wheeled him into the OR as part of an “Honor Walk” — while he was very much alive. Two doctors refused to continue, and the surgery was finally canceled. TJ is still alive today. Now, 3 years later, whistleblowers have come forward — and federal investigations are underway. 🔴 Let’s be real: “Brain death” is a medical-legal invention — not actual death — created to fast-track organ harvesting. You cannot harvest usable organs from a dead person. The donor must be alive — breathing, heart beating — so the industry can profit. How many more close calls never come to light? 🛡️ Want to opt‑out as an organ donor? You can change or cancel your organ donor status at any time: • Visit the National Donate Life Registry at [http://RegisterMe.org] or your state’s registry site, and update your profile to remove yourself  . • If you have a donor designation on your driver’s license, you may also need to get a new license without it at your local DMV . Credit to original owner… Unknown

Register to be an Organ, Eye and Tissue Donor More than 100,000 people are waiting for a lifesaving transplant. Register today registerme.org
Saved - August 2, 2025 at 2:14 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared a shocking story about a 13-year-old girl in Alabama who was declared "brain-dead" but woke up just before organ harvesting. This raises serious concerns about the accuracy of such diagnoses and the potential for financial incentives in organ donation. I questioned how many similar cases exist and highlighted the troubling reality that this situation is part of a larger, profit-driven industry. Many others echoed my sentiments, expressing disbelief and concern over the ethics of organ donation practices and the intersection of money and medicine.

@catsscareme2021 - Jessica Rojas 🇺🇸💪

Imagine being 13… declared "brain-dead"… and waking up right before they cut you open for your organs. This isn’t a horror movie. It happened. A 13-year-old Alabama girl was set to become an organ donor. Her family was told she was gone forever. Machines were prepped, surgeons ready. Then-she moved. She opened her eyes. She LIVED. Doctors said she was "brain-dead." They were wrong. How many others have been silenced, buried, or cut open alive… all because of faulty tests and a rush to harvest? If you think hospitals don’t have financial incentives when it comes to organ donation, think again. Every single time a case like this emerges, officials say ‘protocol wasn’t followed.’ How many times do we need to hear that before we question the system itself?

@catsscareme2021 - Jessica Rojas 🇺🇸💪

How many people have to move, cry, or wake up right before organ harvesting before we call it what it is? This isn’t medicine- it’s a billion-dollar industry built on greed and deception.

@catsscareme2021 - Jessica Rojas 🇺🇸💪

@GenBelisarius That describes it perfectly, unfortunately 😕

@catsscareme2021 - Jessica Rojas 🇺🇸💪

@DrWojakMD I remember reading this on FB several years ago. It was my first wake up call regarding organ donation.. scary.

@catsscareme2021 - Jessica Rojas 🇺🇸💪

@SeanBFlanagan Too many! And they always call these "mistakes"

@catsscareme2021 - Jessica Rojas 🇺🇸💪

@fubots1 Smart! 🙏

@catsscareme2021 - Jessica Rojas 🇺🇸💪

@joe4deadcat It is! Did you ever watch the video with the Doctor who admits "brain death" is a lie?

@catsscareme2021 - Jessica Rojas 🇺🇸💪

@Kelly4Infowars I agree. The body will either reject the organs or it destroys their bodies because of the massive drugs they need to be on..

@catsscareme2021 - Jessica Rojas 🇺🇸💪

@boytzun You're very right ✅ it's like programmed robots who have been taught since childhood to obey, memorize, sit still and never question "authority" I get it.

@catsscareme2021 - Jessica Rojas 🇺🇸💪

@kristi10442 This is absolutely heartbreaking. I can’t imagine how that moment must stay with you. Thank you for sharing something so personal—your story matters, and I’m so sorry you had to go through that. 🙏

@catsscareme2021 - Jessica Rojas 🇺🇸💪

@suezq7369 Yes, they made a killing in many different ways during Covid, sadly.

@catsscareme2021 - Jessica Rojas 🇺🇸💪

@asamomma1 You're on to something.. Money, politics, and opaque policy can intersect dangerously in medicine.

Saved - October 10, 2025 at 2:30 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The reality of organ transplants is far more troubling than most realize. Investigations reveal that nearly 30% of organ donors showed signs of life during harvesting, raising ethical concerns about the definition of death, which was altered decades ago. Corruption and exploitation in the organ trade are rampant, with significant financial incentives leading to black market activities. Additionally, recipients may experience emotional and personality changes linked to their donors. The medical community must address these profound issues and explore alternatives to organ harvesting.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

The truth about organ transplants is worse than anyone imagined. Millions sign up as organ donors, never imagining the system could betray them. But federal investigators found nearly 30% of ANR donors showed signs of life, as surgeons prepared to harvest their organs. Nurses say some organ donors are sedated or even paralyzed just so the organ harvesting procedures can continue. Even more disturbing, the definition of “death” was re-engineered decades ago to make this nightmare possible. This is what no one tells you about being an organ donor—and what really happens when someone receives an organ. 🧵 THREAD

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

The information in this thread comes from the work of medical researcher @MidwesternDoc. For all the sources and details, read the full report below. https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-unseen-cost-of-organ-transplants

The Unseen Cost of Organ Transplants: Ethical Issues and Spiritual Implications Exploring the Ambiguity of Brain Death, the Ethics of Organ Harvesting, and the Mysterious Transference of Consciousness midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

In case you missed it, @MidwesternDoc released one of the most shocking reports yet. Yes, organ transplants save lives—but the system is absolutely riddled with corruption, misdiagnosed “brain death,” and multiple cases of patients showing signs of life as their organs were about to be harvested. This is nothing short of disturbing.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

The organ trade (yes, that’s a thing) is worth billions, and a single transplant can cost nearly $2 million. Whenever we’re dealing with that kind of money, exploitation always follows. Always. Investigations estimate 5–20% of kidney transplants worldwide come from black markets—often at the expense of the poor or the imprisoned.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

One of the most disturbing revelations: the definition of death was deliberately re-engineered to make organ harvesting easier. In 1968, Harvard created the term “brain death.” Not because science proved it was a thing, but because it allowed doctors to legally harvest viable organs from people whose hearts were still beating. A beating hard is necessary for keeping organs alive and healthy for transplantation.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Since then, countless patients who were diagnosed as brain dead have later revived. This has even happened moments before their organs were to be removed for transplantation. This isn’t just a conspiracy or a once in a million occurrence. This is happening to real people, some of whom have survived to tell their story. Colleen Burns woke up on the operating table. Jahi McMath was written off as dead but showed brainwaves and purposeful movement months later.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

One of the most incredible cases of something called “Locked-in syndrome” happened to a 12-year-old boy named Martin. Locked-in syndrome is when someone is still conscious but has lost all control of their body and all ability to communicate. Hence the term “locked-in—they’re literally trapped inside their own body. Martin was left in a vegetative state after a bout with meningitis. He was eventually sent home where his parents waited for him to die. But he didn’t. Four years later, Martin began to regain consciousness. By the age of 19 he was aware of everything around him, and at 26, a caregiver discovered signs that he was indeed aware. Eventually, Martin recovered enough to get married.

Video Transcript AI Summary
NBC News exclusive: the first American TV interview with a man who lived essentially trapped inside his own body for about a decade—he could see and hear everything around him, but he couldn't talk or move. Doctors told his parents he couldn't understand the world around him, but that changed when someone realized he was in there. Martin Pastorius, who fell ill at 12 in South Africa, says he was awake and unseen for nearly ten years. He now communicates by typing into a computer that voices his words: "You must have overheard so many conversations." He recalls abuse in care centers, though most caregivers were good; a therapist noticed a glimmer ten years in. He went to college, learned to drive, and married Jonah in 2008. His book Ghost Boy is a New York Times bestseller, and his message: "don't overlook what's possible" and to "treat everyone with kindness, dignity, compassion, and respect..."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Back now with an NBC News exclusive tonight. The first American TV interview with a man who lived essentially trapped inside his own body for about a decade of his life. He could see and hear everything around him, but he couldn't talk. And he couldn't control his body movements. Doctors told his parents he couldn't understand the world going on around him, but that all changed one day when someone finally realized he was in there, then started the effort to unlock the man inside. We get his story tonight from NBC's Kate Snow. Speaker 1: To look at Martin Pastorius now, you'd never know what he's been through. He was a healthy 12 year old growing up in South Africa when he went home sick from school one day. Speaker 2: He never ever got better. Speaker 1: His body weakened. He lost control of his muscles, stopped communicating. Doctors believed it was a neurodegenerative disease and told his parents he was unaware of the world around him. But that was wrong. For nearly a decade, he says he was awake, but no one noticed. Speaker 3: For some many years, I was like a ghost. It was like I wasn't there. I was invisible. Speaker 1: This is Martin today. This is how you communicate now? Speaker 3: Yes. Speaker 1: He speaks by typing into a computer that voices his words. Because that takes time, we gave him some of our questions in advance. You must have overheard so many conversations. Speaker 3: Yes. Many times. You get to see and hear things that you probably never would. Things like what people really think and how they really are when nobody is watching. Speaker 1: Like one night when he heard his mom in a moment of despair. Speaker 2: I said to him one day, I hope you die. And I had no idea that he understood that. And I'm very, very sorry I said it. Speaker 3: While I was very sad and upset by what she said, I understood where that was coming from. My mother often felt that she wasn't a good mom, and one of the hardest things for me was I couldn't tell her that. No. You are doing great. She is a good mother. Speaker 1: Martin lived at home with his parents, but was regularly in care centers where he says at times he was subjected to abuse, verbal, physical, and sexual. Speaker 3: There was never a care home that I was in where there wasn't some degree of abuse. Even if it didn't happen to me, I witnessed it happening to others. Speaker 1: But he says most of his caregivers were good people, like the therapist who noticed a glimmer in Martin's eye ten years into his illness. Tess revealed he could communicate. Speaker 3: I remember feeling happy, like, wow, But also thinking to myself, what next? Speaker 1: As your mind grew stronger, did your body also get stronger? Speaker 3: Yes. My body slower got stronger too. It took a massive amount of work, blood, sweat, and tears, literally over many years. Speaker 1: He went to college, even learned to drive using an adapted car. And in 02/2008, he met a friend of his sisters, Jonah. Speaker 2: I just thought it's really attractive. Speaker 1: They got married five years ago. Martin, it sounds almost like a love at first sight kind of story. Speaker 3: Yes. I think it was. It is hard to explain, but you just know. I had heard people say that I'd always thought, yeah, right, until it happened to me. Speaker 1: His message now, don't overlook what's possible. Speaker 3: Treat everyone with kindness, dignity, compassion, and respect whether or not you think they understand or not, to never underestimate the power of the mind, the importance of love and faith, and to never stop dreaming. Speaker 1: Martin is a man who appreciates every joy in life. His book Ghost Boy is now on the New York Times bestseller list, Brian. Speaker 0: What an incredible story and what a message there at the end about how to treat other people.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Despite the fact that brain death is not straightforward and significant variations (like not actually being brain dead) are not as rare as they would like to admit, the New York Times recently argued that the definition of death should be broadened even more to meet the increasing organ demand. They want to redefine what life means until the organ supply matches the system’s needs.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc Want the full report with cases and documentation? It’s all available in @MidwesternDoc's article: https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-unseen-cost-of-organ-transplants

The Unseen Cost of Organ Transplants: Ethical Issues and Spiritual Implications Exploring the Ambiguity of Brain Death, the Ethics of Organ Harvesting, and the Mysterious Transference of Consciousness midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Investigations into the U.S. organ procurement system (OPTN) have confirmed the worst: widespread corruption and dysfunction. Congress found 80% of eligible organs are never even collected, whistleblowers are retaliated against, and families are misled and gaslit in moments of crisis.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

A federal review revealed an absolutely chilling statistic. Nearly 30% of authorized but not recovered cases showed signs of consciousness during the organ harvesting process. Patients were crying, moving, and even mouthing “help me.” Some brave surgeons have refused to operate while coordinators pressured them to continue the harvesting process despite obvious signs of life.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Nurses have testified that patients were sedated, and sometimes even purposefully paralyzed, to push forward organ harvesting procedures. One ICU nurse: “All they care about is getting organs. They’re so aggressive. It’s sickening.” This isn’t medical care—it’s straight out of a horror movie.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Even when transplants succeed, outcomes are often grim. Organ transplant isn’t easy. Within 10 years, nearly half of kidney and heart grafts fail. In an effort to achieve success, patients are forced to take toxic immune-suppressing drugs for life, costing $10,000–$30,000 a year. Unsurprisingly, these drugs can come with severe side effects. Survival comes at a steep price.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

If this didn’t sound horrific enough, the COVID era added new layers of cruelty. Around the world, unvaccinated patients were denied transplants. Some complied—only to suffer organ rejection soon after the shot. Others were told by their doctors that they were not eligible for the vaccine, due to their frailty—but that didn’t matter. And guess what? Reports now link mRNA vaccines to graft failures in kidneys, livers, corneas, and hearts.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc The deeper you look, the darker it gets. @MidwesternDoc's full report is a must-read. https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-unseen-cost-of-organ-transplants

The Unseen Cost of Organ Transplants: Ethical Issues and Spiritual Implications Exploring the Ambiguity of Brain Death, the Ethics of Organ Harvesting, and the Mysterious Transference of Consciousness midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

An often unacknowledged feature of organ transplants is that they often transfer memories, emotions, even personality traits from donor to recipient. Cases document recipients developing new cravings, habits, or even dreams reflecting their donor’s final moments. Science can’t explain it. But it happens.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Dr. Paul Pearsall’s research in this phenomenon, The Heart’s Code, details dozens of these cases. One woman craved beer and chicken nuggets—her donor’s favorites. A child dreamed vividly of her donor’s murder and later helped police identify the killer. Sounds unbelievable, doesn’t it? If true, what happens in the final moments before organs are removed is significant and must be considered.

Video Transcript AI Summary
A heart transplant is life changing; some recipients report memories and tastes from their donor. "I absolutely do not believe for a second that a heart is just a pump." "I was convinced that I was living with the presence of another within me." "It's like two people in one body." Researchers Pearsall and Schwartz examine donor memories and "feedback memory" theories, publishing cases where a donor's heart influenced a recipient's tastes. "Memory itself is what's called distributed, distributed process." HeartMath finds the heart is "the most accurate part of our body that reflects how we're feeling" and "the largest generator of electromagnetic signals in the body." They ask whether the heart could have its own intelligence and what this means for memory and transplant recipients.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: A heart transplant is a life changing event. Speaker 1: The world is now my oyster from the bottom to the top. Speaker 0: But for a few, it brings much more. Speaker 2: I absolutely do not believe for a second that a heart is just a pump. Speaker 3: Little by little, many things started happening. Speaker 2: I was more of an Italian food fan, but I love Mexican food now. Speaker 3: Suddenly, green peppers, putting them in my food. I used to take them out. Speaker 4: I just was writing and writing and writing. Speaker 2: I didn't have a clue where it was coming from. Speaker 3: I was convinced that I was living with the presence of another within me. Speaker 1: It's like two people in one body. Speaker 0: Is it possible that a new heart could bring with it the memories of a donor? Speaker 5: This idea of a sentient, remembering, connecting heart is one of the most radical scientific concepts to come along in a very long time and it changes everything. Speaker 0: With strict codes of confidentiality in place at the hospital, it was impossible for Claire to have known these details about her donor. So where could these memories have come from? Professor Paul Pearsall is a cardio neurologist from the University of Honolulu. He first encountered stories like Claire's whilst recovering in hospital from a bone marrow transplant. Speaker 5: I had a bone marrow transplant for stage four cancer in the very early 80s and I was on the transplant unit and we would sit down at night all of us who were dying and most of us were, and talk about things. And the heart transplant recipients were reporting, receiving the memories, feelings, food preferences, fears, musical preferences of their donor. One woman who got the heart of a boxer was the most quiet, demure, easygoing woman, hated violence, left the room when her husband would watch football. She got this heart of the boxer, now she watches football and yells and swears and punches and everything. So that's when I started hearing all these remarkable stories and I started to collect every single one I could. Speaker 0: Could the transplanted heart be bringing with it some kind of information from its previous owner? We know that the heart is a hugely energetic organ and is in constant communication with the brain. 40,000 neurons or nerve cells in the heart communicate up to the brain. Hormones from the heart travel in our bloodstream and every time the heart beats it creates a pulse wave. But most impressive of all is our heart's magnetic energy, 5,000 times more powerful than the brain. It can be measured up to feet away from our bodies. Speaker 5: I thought this heart is just as powerful, more powerful, and does talk to the brain. Maybe we should be paying attention to that. Maybe the brain, even though it thinks it's us, isn't. Speaker 0: Professor Pearsall was sure that the energy of the heart and its relationship with the brain was the key. And as more and more transplant patients came up with these remarkable experiences, it seemed to confirm it. But could his hunch stand up to science? Speaker 5: The heart is a connective organ, a gentle organ. It's a different type of intelligence. I don't know all about its intelligence. That's what we need to learn, And how we learn that is by asking openly questions about people's hearts, not dismissing them as poetry, as metaphor. Say maybe there's something to this. Speaker 0: Professor Pearsall collated his research into a book called The Heart's Code. In it, he explored these stories about organ transplant patients and what they reveal about where we store our memories. Simultaneously, on the opposite side of America, Professor of Psychology and Psychiatry from Yale University, Gary Schwartz, was developing a new theory of how memory could work. Speaker 1: I was studying how feedback mechanisms are involved in learning. When we talk, for example, how the brain learns, we talk about what are called neural networks in the brain. It turns out that the way a neural network works is that the output of the neurons feed back to the input of the neurons. And this process goes over and over again. And so long as the feedback is present, the neurons will learn. If you cut the feedback, there is no learning in the neurons. And the implication is that it's important for the neurons to have the feedback in order for the learning to take place. Well, by extension, any system that has feedback is gonna therefore learn. I mean, we learn to shoot baskets, for example, in basketball by getting feedback about whether we're accurate or not. We learn to speak by getting feedback about whether we're accurate or not. And so consequently, any system, any set of cells that has feedback mechanisms in a network is gonna learn the same way that neurons learn. And that's what's called feedback memory or systemic memory. Speaker 0: He applied his theory of feedback memory to the heart and predicted that information could be transferred through organs in transplant surgery. At around the same time, cases like Claire Sylvia hit the headlines. And Professor Pearsall published numerous similar stories from transplant patients. The two men realized their common ground and got in touch with each other. Speaker 1: We spoke to each other on the telephone, and as I began to hear more details about the cases, I began to realize that this was a theoretical prediction that could actually be verified in the biomedical world. I told Paul that I felt it was very important that some of his best cases be looked at very carefully and that they be published in a journal article. Speaker 5: I collected and did the interviews and did the transcripts and the analysis of the transcripts and have got all the transcripts together and then sent them to Doctor. Schwartz. Speaker 0: They had to trace and interview not only the heart recipients but also the donor families What they were looking for were parallels between donor and recipient in their preferences, memories, and tastes. Speaker 1: I independently examined those cases, had them blindly looked at by other individuals, and then wrote a formal research report describing those cases and giving the kinds of examples of data that are sort of irrefutable. If you look at the content carefully, you will discover that the degree of coincidence is too detailed. For example, there's a case that we describe of a man 47 years old, and he received the heart of a 17 year old black young man. And he was not racist, but he had a lot of biases about what he expected of young black men, including the fact that if he was gonna pick up anything from them, he would be afraid, for example, that he might be picking up rap music. However, after he received the transplant of the various changes that he experienced is he had a profound change in his preference for music. He became obsessed with classical music. He began listening to it over and over. He began singing melodies classical melodies to songs he hadn't heard. His wife was thoroughly confused. Only later was it learned that the young boy was actually leaving his violin lessons because he was a classical violinist, and he was hit by a car. That kind of information is not the kind of information that you just get with a random assortment of fears or changes in simple preferences. Speaker 0: The stories they were collecting seemed to contain remarkable parallels. It seemed to Schwartz that the information relayed by the recipient could only have come from their new heart. Speaker 1: To the extent that the heart is serving as a circulating feedback storage system for core central memories in the body, then if that heart is taken out and placed in another body, those core central memories, which are circulating within the heart in its cellular and neural feedback loops would continue and be passed on in the new person. Speaker 0: Jim is one of those patients who experienced an extraordinary change directly after his operation five years ago. Speaker 4: Well, I left school when I was 15. I was a common man in a lorry driver room, so I didn't have a very good education. But I learned myself how to write, and I'm not very good Speaker 6: at Speaker 4: spelling. So it was a surprise to me that six months after we transplant, I just sat down one morning and just scribbled saying down, and then that led to many poems and me book what I'm writing. I just was writing and writing and writing, and that's how it came about, like, you know. And I don't know where it come from, to be honest with you, because I said I've never done anything like this before. I'm sending you a thousand kisses. Speaker 0: Before his transplant, Jim had no creative talent for writing and very little time for sentimentality. Speaker 4: Never ever wrote anything before in my life. Never even sent her a love letter in forty two years. Have I? Oh. Some Speaker 0: scientists now think they found a system of neurons in the heart that challenges the orthodox view of the brain. Speaker 5: Until the recent past, science has glorified the brain. The questions we should be asking as scientists is, is that the only place these things happen? When we just know about the heart and its remarkable energy, and its connections with the brain, and its neurons, and its hormones, if we know that, shouldn't we be asking is, and here comes the key scientific question, is there another source of intelligence? Is there another way to think? Not instead, but also. The question isn't either or. The question is and. And if we only glorify the brain, we'll never be open to the possibility that another organ thinks. Speaker 0: Researchers at the Institute of Heart Math in California are investigating the possibility that the heart could actually have its own unique intelligence. Doctor Roland McCratie and his colleagues have developed experiments to see whether the metaphors of the heart could stand up to scientific scrutiny. Speaker 6: I first heard of Paul Pearsall when I think he contacted me in terms of exploring possible mechanisms that might explain the the phenomena of a heart transplant recipient taking on some of the personality characteristics of the person that they got the heart from. He'd interviewed quite a number of patients that had this experience and there's enough of this that I think we have to take it seriously. There is something going on here. Speaker 0: Doctor. McCratie's research is controversial, but he found support in evidence provided by a neurologist, Doctor. Andrew Amour from Montreal in Canada. After many years treating patients with heart disease he observed there was more to the heart than the current scientific model could explain. Speaker 7: In those days, in the sixties, there was no consideration of the nervous system. The heart was just a pump and the reason is because people have not had the facility to see the heart in any other form. You look at it and it's a pump. Right? And my own bias is that in the last fifty years or so, we have developed the ability with all the electronics to record more than just the muscle on the heart, but the neurons on the heart. Speaker 0: As he looked closer, he noticed something remarkable. Speaker 7: I started to record outside the heart and found neurons that no one had expected before. And I thought, gee, that's sort of nice. I wonder if that could be on the heart. Right? So from there and having developed techniques that I felt good about, I put them on a heart and bingo, they worked. Speaker 0: He had discovered a sophisticated collection of neurons in the heart. According to him, they were organized into a small but complex nervous system. He called it the little brain in the heart. Suddenly, our traditional views on the brain and intelligence were being challenged. If the heart had brain cells, could it have its own unique type of intelligence? The researchers at HeartMath believe so. They call it heart intelligence. Speaker 6: The heart itself has a quite complex nervous system and all the types of neurons and the way they're wired together to be able to say that the heart has a functional brain. And doctor Armour has pictures of it. I mean, it's there's definitely a little brain in the heart. And the types of neurons that are in the brain and the heart have also been demonstrated to have both short and long term memory using the same type of techniques that you'd use to show that neurons in the brain exhibit memory. Speaker 7: This little collection of neurons can retain input function for a little while. So if your heart beats, puts it in, this little guy is still oscillating. So the last cardiac cycle could set up a number of future cardiac cycles. That's memory. Speaker 0: Once a heart is removed from the donor, it is cooled and can stay alive for up to four hours. Speaker 7: Heart's in the room. Thank you. Speaker 0: Only when the heart is profused with blood from its new owner does it spontaneously start beating again. It is thought that this internal nervous system or brain in the heart is what allows a heart transplant to work. McCratie goes further. Speaker 6: Certainly the function of the heart itself have got to be transplanted and go along. When you think of the heart it's a very complex organ. All the coordination that has to happen within the heart for it to pump efficiently and it it really can't function properly and efficiently without the neural system in the in the heart. That that's very clear. So that those types of functions have got to get transplanted, and there's certain types of memory there that the heart has to remember what it did last beat or a few beats ago to be able to function properly now. Speaker 7: Boy, the heart started beating right away, didn't it? Pretty good. Pretty nice. Speaker 0: If the heart has a nervous system and a type of memory needed for its efficient function, could higher level memories also be stored and transferred? And what would this tell us about where our memory resides? Speaker 6: Memory itself is what's called distributed, distributed process. And this has been known for many, many, many hundred years. Now that you can't localize memory to a neuron or a group of neurons. The memory itself is distributed throughout the neural system. So why do we have to draw a line at the throat and say that memory is only distributed from here to here? Why couldn't it be distributed throughout the whole neural system? Speaker 0: And if memory is distributed throughout the nervous system, including organs like the heart, what would this mean for transplant recipients? Speaker 6: When you put a heart into a transplant, we could potentially retrieve some of those memories that were distributed throughout the whole system. I'm certainly not saying that is the explanation, but it's plausible that could be what's going on. Speaker 0: Some heart transplant recipients feel a change so profound they are battling with a complete transformation. Bill Wohl from Phoenix, Arizona had a heart transplant five years ago. His change after the operation was dramatic. Speaker 8: I couldn't have been luckier because I got a fantastic donor, someone super healthy, handsome leading man, good looks, and the fun began. Speaker 0: Bill felt he was being driven by a completely new personality. Previously a successful and hardworking businessman, he put his career aside and began a new life. Doctor Jack Copeland was his transplant surgeon. Speaker 7: Within months, the man was transformed into an athlete. We have very little idea that this was going to happen to him, but it did. He started cycling, he started working out, he started swimming. Speaker 0: Just months after his operation, Bill began training excessively. But it wasn't until a full year later, when he met his donor family, that he found out that he had developed remarkable parallels to his donor. Speaker 8: I know on certain things that I had no interest or whatever in before, it had to come from somewhere and it makes sense to me, and I truly believe that it came from my donor. Speaker 0: Brady, Bill's donor, was a Hollywood stuntman. Go. Whoo. It was only when Bill met his donor family that his new interests seemed to make sense. He is convinced that he has inherited many personality traits through his donor's heart. The researchers at the Institute of Heart Math set out to design an experiment to investigate the heart's role in processing emotional information. Speaker 6: What we found was that the heart is by far the most accurate part of our body that reflects how we're feeling. Our heart is literally beating out different messages that is strongly correlated with our emotional state. It's a scientific fact, even though a lot of people don't know this, that the heart sends more information to the brain than the brain sends to the heart. Speaker 1: It's very important to understand the relationship between the brain and the heart because this ultimately helps us understand how the heart can have memories related to the brain. The brain and the heart are interconnected by multiple sources of information. First of all, there's neural connection from the brain to the heart. There's also humoral connections. Okay? Hormones will go from the brain to the heart. The heart, in turn, of course, sends feedback back to the brain through pressure receptors and through, literally the blood going back. But then, what's often not recognized is that the heart is the largest generator of electromagnetic signals in the body. In fact, the EKG is is 10, a 100 times even larger than the EEG of the brain. And the electrical signal from the heart travels through the bloodstream to the brain. And, of course, the brain's electrical signal travels back to the heart. So consequently, these two are sharing their interactions even electromagnetically with each other. Speaker 6: It's like a radio transmitter works. The heart radiates very strong fields, and the heart is the strongest rhythmic source of electromagnetic fields in the body. And with today's equipment, we can measure the magnetic field of the heart six feet away from the body. Probably, goes farther, but that's the sensitivity of the equipment we have now. Speaker 0: They began investigating the heart's role in our experience of feeling and emotion. Speaker 6: Some of our more recent research where we're looking at the, I call it the electrophysiology of intuition, are indicating that the heart really is connected to some other, I call it, field of information. Speaker 0: In the experiment, subjects were shown photographs chosen to cause extreme emotions, both positive and negative. They were selected at six second intervals at random. They recorded the physiology of brain and heart activity. Speaker 6: What we found is in that what we call pre stimulus period before they saw the photograph, that both the heart and the brain would react differently. That the heart was shifting changing, before the brain was. Speaker 0: According to McCraty, the experiment shows that the heart is behaving intuitively. Remarkably, the heart registers an anticipatory response before a disturbing image appears on screen and sends a message directly to the emotional centers of the brain. The brain then prepares the body to take action. Speaker 6: This was even a surprise to us that the heart was plugged into this type of information even before the brain. Speaker 0: Where all this leads according to McCraty is to suggestion that the brain doesn't have an exclusive role in information processing. Speaker 6: It is quite plausible then that if we transplant a heart from one person to another, that that transplanted heart is connected to a field that field of information from the person that got that heart from and it feels like there's somebody else inside them. Speaker 0: MacRatty's theories are not accepted by mainstream medicine but patients like Claire Sylvia are still searching for an explanation for what they feel. With new evidence that an organ like the heart could have its own unique type of intelligence, we are moving towards an understanding of how the heart, in collaboration with the brain, has a role to play in interpreting the world around us. Speaker 5: The heart may be based on current science a sentient thinking, feeling, remembering organ. That's the story. The transplant patients are some of the data. If that's true, then we ask the question, have we been thinking without a heart for all these years or at least not as much with it as we should? If that's the case, we better wake up and have a heart.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Chinese medicine has long linked organs with emotions. For example, the liver with anger, the lungs with grief, and the heart with joy. Modern transplants appear to validate these beliefs, with recipients suddenly overwhelmed by new emotional states they had never experienced before. But is this being considered in the process?

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

The psychological burden of transplant recipients is immense. Many recipients describe feeling like a stranger suddenly lives inside them. Some resist the new organ because of the way this makes them feel, while others embrace it as a “guardian angel.” Studies suggest even one’s attitude toward the organ can affect whether or not the transplant succeeds.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

It seems that “trapped emotions” may transfer with organs. That means traumas embedded deep within the donor may end up with the recipient. Therapies to release these emotions have reportedly improved organ acceptance and even function. Ignoring them only compounds suffering and increases the chance of rejection.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc While it sounds unbelievable, these aren’t isolated anecdotes—they’re documented patterns. The stories in @MidwesternDoc's report will leave you with goosebumps: https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-unseen-cost-of-organ-transplants

The Unseen Cost of Organ Transplants: Ethical Issues and Spiritual Implications Exploring the Ambiguity of Brain Death, the Ethics of Organ Harvesting, and the Mysterious Transference of Consciousness midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

So what’s the solution? Medicine presents a false and dangerous choice. They currently want to relax the definitions of death to make it even easier to harvest organs and increase supply, or we allow black markets to flourish. Both are unacceptable. There are alternatives to harvesting organs. These include lab-grown organs, xenotransplants, and therapies that restore failing organs before transplant is needed.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc One such therapy is DMSO. Decades ago, IV DMSO was shown to reverse brain injuries that often lead to “brain death.” If adopted, using DMSO could save patients who are now written off as hopeless. This could even reduce the demand for organs altogether.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

At its core, this is much bigger than medicine. Organ transplantation forces us to confront questions about consciousness, death, and the very nature of memory. Where do our emotions really live? Where is our identity stored? And what happens when those things are transplanted into another body? If we’re going to remove organs from one human and put them into another, we must answer these questions. It is irresponsible not to.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Organ transplantation is sold as a miracle. Yes, the practice has saved countless lives. Maybe even someone in your own life has been touched by organ transplantation. But behind the curtain lies corruption, redefined death, live harvesting, and spiritual questions that modern science refuses to face. The truth is disturbing. And it can’t be ignored.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc Thanks for reading! This information was based on a report originally published by @MidwesternDoc. Key details were streamlined and editorialized for clarity and impact. Read the original report here. https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-unseen-cost-of-organ-transplants

The Unseen Cost of Organ Transplants: Ethical Issues and Spiritual Implications Exploring the Ambiguity of Brain Death, the Ethics of Organ Harvesting, and the Mysterious Transference of Consciousness midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc For a deeper dive into what modern medicine has overlooked—or intentionally buried—check out these other eye-opening reports by @MidwesternDoc: What They Don’t Tell You About C-Sections https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/what-the-dont-tell-you-about-c-sections

What They Don’t Tell You About C-Sections Exploring the short and long term consequences of a frequently unnecessary procedure midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc The Great Cholesterol Scam and The Dangers of Statins https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-great-cholesterol-scam-and-the

The Great Cholesterol Scam and The Dangers of Statins Exploring the Actual Causes and Treatments of Heart Disease midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc What’s The Healthiest Water To Drink? https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/whats-the-healthiest-water-to-drink

What's The Healthiest Water To Drink? April's Open Thread midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc While you’re at it, give @MidwesternDoc a follow. No one brings more research, clinical insight, or historical context when it comes to exposing the health myths we’ve all been fed. This is easily one of the most valuable accounts you’ll ever follow. --> @MidwesternDoc https://t.co/6q2ec60QGx

Saved - November 10, 2025 at 8:50 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I argue brain death was invented in 1968 to redefine irreversible coma as death, enabling organ harvesting. The dead donor rule seeks to prevent killing for organs, yet declaring someone dead allows harvesting. Critics like Pellegrino oppose sacrificing persons; others like Wijdicks say brain death serves transplantation. Today, cardiac and circulatory death are also used. You can opt out through donor registries and cards.

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

"There Is No Such Thing As Brain Death, It's A Lie. If Your Heart Is Beating, You Are Not Dead." Kate Shemirani "Brain Death Was Invented To Harvest More Organs." "Authorities Will Decide If They Will Provide You With Life Saving Care Or Prep You For 'Organ Donation' Surgery." In 1968, without studies or evidence 13 people at Harvard Medical School coined the idea of brain death...that certain people in a coma, who had always been considered to be alive...could now be redefined as being dead, “Our primary purpose is to define irreversible coma as a new criterion for death.” They believed redefining them as already being dead would remove all controversy surrounding harvesting their organs for transplantation. This forever changed the dead donor ethics rule... The dead donor rule states that people must neither be alive when organs are removed nor killed by the process of organ removal. By redefining people with severe brain injury as being dead already, this sets in motion the taking of a life. They are alive, unable to speak or communicate in any conceivable way & cannot stop the organ donation surgery process being done to them. Dr. Edmund D. Pellegrino, founding director of the Pellegrino Center for Bioethics at Georgetown University, argues against brain death... "The only indisputable signs of death are those we have known since antiquity, i.e., loss of sentience, heartbeat, and breathing; mottling and coldness of skin; muscular rigidity; and eventual putrefaction as the result of generalized autolysis of body cells." "I have chosen to give priority to the welfare of the patient before he or she becomes a donor on grounds that harm must not be done even if good comes from it." "No person should be sacrificed as a means for the good of another. This is a moral precept that recognizes the intrinsic worth of every human being." From its inception, “brain death” has been driven by the desire for viable organs. Today, in addition to 'brain death' there are the classifications of 'cardiac death' & 'circulatory death' used by organ procuring organizations for organ harvesting. A coma patient or someone on a ventilator who is fully alive within, can be pronounced as a "cardiac or circulatory death" & organs harvested to be sold for transplants. Dr. Eelco F. Wijdicks, American Academy of Neurology (AAN), has stated... "The diagnosis of brain death is driven by whether there is a transplantation program or whether there are transplantation surgeons. I do not think brain death examination now, in practice, would have much if any meaning if it were not for the sake of transplantation." 👇How To Opt Out Of Organ Donation In The US👇 https://donatelife.net/donation/donor-registries/removing-yourself-from-a-donor-registry/ 👇Organ Donation Cardiac Death Controversy👇 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1556793108000491#:~:text=Persistent%20barriers%20to%20donation%20continue,the%20continuation%20of%20DCD%20practices 👇The Reality Of Brain Death & Organ Donation👇 https://lifeissues.org/2015/10/surprising-realities-of-organ-donation-and-brain-death/ Speaker: @KateShemirani Video: @Wellness_Radar

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 argues against the concept of brain death, stating that if the heart is beating, a person is not dead and that the idea of brain death is a lie manufactured to enable organ eugenics. He contends that organ donation cannot occur from a dead body, explaining that within three minutes of no oxygen brain cells begin to die and within five minutes cellular death occurs, so organs can only be taken from someone who is alive. He then claims that the best organ donor under 30 is someone with a beating heart, circulation, and ideally on a ventilator. He questions when the decision to take organs is made, suggesting it happens very early, possibly before the patient is aware of what is happening because the treatment to preserve organs differs from life-saving treatment. He references the UK policy implemented on May 22, where everyone became an organ donor unless they opt out. He asserts that people do not know about this policy and that once a 999 call is made, information is displayed on a screen; they know who you are, which is why there is a push toward a digital system. He claims the entire medical history would be fed through AI, including tax information and what a person is worth to the system, to determine whether they are a donor (yay) or not (nay). The transcript further asserts that a person’s status—whether they are receiving life-saving treatment or are on end-of-life care—along with age, will influence organ-donor status. He emphasizes the importance of people understanding this, and concludes by reiterating his belief that this process amounts to eugenics, labeling it as eugenics.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There's no such thing as brain dead, brain death. If your heart is beating, you're not dead, it's a lie, you're not dead, it's a lie, it was a lie that was manufactured so that they could do their eugenics, taking organs from one person to the next. First of all, you cannot take an organ from a dead body, from a cadaver. Within three minutes of no oxygen, you're going to start damaging brain cells and within five minutes, you're gonna have cellular death. You have got to be alive to take your organs, that's the end of it, you're not dead. Who makes the best organ donor under 30 with a beating heart, a circulation and ideally on a ventilator? When is the decision made to take your organs? Very early on, probably before you are even aware what they are doing because the treatment to preserve your organs is very different to the treatment to save your life. In The UK on the May 22, everybody became an organ donor unless you opt out, people do not know, so the minute that you make that 999 phone call, everything's up there on the screen, they know who you are, this is why they want you on a digital system. Your entire medical history is going to be fed through AI, how much tax you pay, what you're worth to the system, and that's going to come up with whether you're a yay or a nay. Are you getting life saving treatment or are you on end of life care? What age are you? Are you then for organ donor? This is very important that people know this, and so you have to ask what is this, it's eugenics, it's eugenics.
Removing Yourself From a Donor Registry We understand that you are considering removing your donor registration. In case you have questions about organ, eye and tissue donation, please read our frequently asked questions. If you registered through your local motor vehicle department Please go to your state’s online registry to update or remove your donor registration. You can find your state’s online […] donatelife.net
Controversies in Organ Donation: Donation After Cardiac Death An ever-increasing disparity between the demand for vital organs for transplantation and the number of available donors presents challenges to the med… sciencedirect.com
Surprising Realities of Organ Donation and Brain Death - Life Issues Institute The realities of organ donation and how the subjective nature of the brain death diagnosis can influence procurement teams, doctors and families. lifeissues.org
Saved - November 29, 2025 at 7:53 PM

@iluminatibot - illuminatibot

Brain dead is a lie, [they] invented brain dead to harvest your organs legally. https://t.co/gmZ74Xmqsc

Saved - February 6, 2026 at 10:16 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m reading New Brunswick law that allows organ removal after death has not yet occurred if a physician says death is imminent from injury or disease. I’m told you don’t need to be dead to have organs harvested, and who will be carved up while still not dead—the most vulnerable people with no voice in the hospital.

@thevivafrei - Viva Frei

Understand what you are reading here. Read the words. Then read them again. This is actual law in New Brunswick, Canada, as related to presumptive organ donation. "17: The Chief Coroner may allow the removal of organs or tissue after the death of a person notwithstanding that death has not yet occurred if: (a) in the opinion of a physician the death of the person is imminent by reason of injury or disease" You don't need to be dead to have your organs harvested. And who do you think will be carved up while still *not dead*? The most vulnerable people of society with no voice in the hospital to protect them.

View Full Interactive Feed