reSee.it - Related Post Feed

@alexandrosM - Alexandros Marinos 🏴‍☠️

The Maddie de Garay case is the one case that blows up the whole Pfizer vaccine story. They misreported her injury in the 12-15 year-old children's vaccine trial, because if it were reported, that would have represented a far worse outcome than the covid harms to those 1000 children, which were of course negligible, and therefore the benefits of the vaccine to those healthy children, which were of course negligible. This is true especially considering that most children were naturally immune by that point. Pfizer lied and that lie presented a completely distorted image of what the outcome of the trial was, leading to Pfizer fraudulently securing further contracts, as well as the eventual inclusion of the COVID shots in the children's vaccine schedule. That inclusion, in turn, due to the provides Pfizer with liability shielding due to the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA) of 1986 (42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to 300aa-34). This law shields Pfizer of liability from that vaccine for injuries in *any patient*, so long as it is in the childhood schedule and it is also considered safe for pregnant women. If this isn't investigated thoroughly, nothing will ever be, but of course the story goes way too deep for it to ever be investigated properly. Once more, props to @RepThomasMassie and @AaronSiriSG for bringing this issue back to the surface.

@AaronSiriSG - Aaron Siri

My written testimony to Congress prior to testifying last week (full version with footnotes available at https://judiciary.house.gov/sites/evo-subsites/republicans-judiciary.house.gov/files/evo-media-document/Siri%20Testimony.pdf…): Dear Chairman Massie, Thank you for the invitation to testify before the House Judiciary Subcommittee ... in the hearing titled, Follow the Science?: Oversight of the Biden Covid-19 Administrative State Response. Our firm’s vaccine practice, which spans vaccine injury, exemptions, and policy, has over forty professionals. In our lawsuits, we must prove claims regarding these products with government and high impact journal data and sources. Appeals to credentials do not suffice. Please find below a few points regarding Covid-19 vaccines we believe provide a broader framework in which to consider the administrative state’s actions regarding these products. While these points may conflict with the cultural cognition of some, based on our experience, they reflect the best available evidence.

@AaronSiriSG - Aaron Siri

1. Covid-19 Vaccine Trials Were Robust When Compared with Other Vaccine Trials The pivotal trials relied upon to license Covid-19 vaccines were robust as compared to the trials relied upon to license most childhood vaccines. The following chart compares the pivotal trials for Pfizer and Moderna’s Covid-19 vaccines with those for FDA licensed vaccines that CDC recommends be injected (three times each) between birth and six months of age: The above data is easily confirmed by reviewing the source material on FDA’s website for each product. For example, below is a screenshot of Section 6.1 of the package insert for the Hep-B vaccine in the chart above: The trial reports submitted to FDA to license this Hep-B vaccine (obtained via FOIA) also confirm it was licensed for infants based on a trial with 147 infants and children and 5 days of safety monitoring after injection. FDA is also over three years late in substantively responding to a petition regarding this patently invalid trial. As another example, Prevnar 13 was licensed for babies based on a trial in which Prevnar was used as a control: In turn, Prevnar was licensed based on a trial in which another experimental vaccine, an “Investigational meningococcal group C conjugate vaccine,” was used as a control: A chart of each vaccine licensed by FDA on CDC’s childhood schedule, along with the control, safety review period, and link to FDA source for each, is available at https://icandecide.org/no-placebo. This chart reflects that none of the vaccines on CDC’s childhood schedule were licensed by FDA based on a long-term placebo-controlled trial and most were licensed based on days or weeks of safety follow up after injection. Hence, in comparison with the trials relied upon to license childhood vaccines, the trials for Covid-19 vaccines were robust. (See Section 2 in next tweet below)

@AaronSiriSG - Aaron Siri

2.Covid-19 Vaccine Trials Anemic When Compared to Drug Trials While Covid-19 vaccine trials were robust as compared to trials for vaccines on the CDC childhood schedule, they were anemic as compared to trials for most drugs. The table below (left) lists Pfizer’s top five selling products, according to one publication. The four drugs listed were each licensed based on a long-term placebo-controlled trial – the one vaccine listed, Prevnar 13, was not. The table below (right) again lists FDA licensed vaccines CDC recommends be injected (three times each) between birth and six months. Clinical trials are critical for assuring safety. After a vaccine is licensed, it is considered unethical to conduct a placebo-controlled trial. Yet, while drugs are typically licensed based on long-term placebo-controlled trials, this is not true of FDA licensed vaccines on CDC’s childhood schedule. (It is also noted that when another vaccine was used as a control, that “control” vaccine was also not licensed based on a long-term placebo-controlled trial. ) This provides further context for the trials relied upon to license Covid-19 vaccines. While these trials were robust when compared to other vaccines, they are anemic when compared to trials relied upon to license drug products. (See Section 3 in next tweet below)

@AaronSiriSG - Aaron Siri

3.Economic Interest to Assure Safety in Drug Trials Absent in Vaccine Trials Economic interests that incentivize a company to assure the safety of its product before release into the market are absent for vaccine products. Trials for drugs and vaccines are conducted by the pharmaceutical company seeking licensure. For drug products, companies remain liable for injuries the drugs cause after licensure. This provides an incentive to conduct long-term placebo-controlled trials to confirm the safety of drug products before licensure to avoid financial loss after licensure. In contrast, for vaccine products, this economic incentive was eliminated by the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 (the “1986 Act”) which gave companies immunity for injuries caused by most vaccines. This is why long-term placebo-controlled trials for vaccine products do not make financial sense for companies seeking to maximize profits. In fact, while assuring safety in drug trials is aligned with a company’s economic interest, it is in conflict in vaccine trials. Prior to 1986, there were 3 routine vaccines totaling 7 injections. The financial liability from these products resulted in companies exiting the market and leaving only one company selling each with the threat they too would cease selling these products. Instead of allowing economic interests to drive innovation of safer products, the 1986 Act gave pharmaceutical companies immunity for vaccine injuries for those products and any childhood vaccine added to CDC’s schedule thereafter. CDC’s maternal and childhood schedules now lists 19 vaccines totaling 84 injections. Covid-19 vaccines were developed within this same framework. Like other vaccines, companies developing Covid-19 vaccines knew before they were even developed that they would not be liable for injuries they caused – not only because of the 1986 Act, but also because of the additional immunity provided by the PREP Act, which the executive branch guaranteed in the procurement contracts for these products before they were even developed. We are not aware of any other product given the immunity for injuries that has been afforded to vaccine companies.

@AaronSiriSG - Aaron Siri

4.HHS’s Promotion and Defense of Vaccines Conflicts with Regulatory Duties to Identify and Disclose Safety and Efficacy Issues In recognition that the 1986 Act gutted the economic interest for companies to assure vaccine safety, the 1986 Act made the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”) and its agencies responsible for vaccine safety. The issue is that HHS’s duties to promote and defend vaccines conflict with its safety duties, and the former duties have sublimated the latter such that companies developing Covid-19 vaccines knew they would, even absent a pandemic, face a friendly regulatory environment. First, duties to promote an industry inherently conflict with duties to identify and address safety issues. This is why, for example, DOT promotes transportation while safety functions are handled by the independent NTSB. Similarly, DOE promotes nuclear power while safety functions are handled by the independent NRC. But with vaccines, these conflicting duties are handled by the same department, HHS. This same conflict exists for Covid-19 vaccines. Second, HHS is statutorily required to and does vigorously defend against vaccine injury claims. Under the 1986 Act, one can bring a claim for a vaccine injury, but it is against the Secretary of HHS in the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (“VICP”). This further conflicts HHS, including because any safety issues identified can be used against HHS in the VICP. Vaccines are the only consumer product where the government defends industry against consumers, instead of vice-versa. The same is true for Covid-19 vaccines – the injured are limited to request benefits from HHS in the CICP. Third, the foregoing conflicts may explain why HHS has failed to perform its basic safety duties pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-27, titled Mandate for Safer Childhood Vaccines (the “Mandate”), which underpins vaccine safety in our country. The Mandate has three simple requirements: (i) HHS must submit a biannual report to Congress detailing how it improved vaccine safety in the preceding two years – but it has never filed even one report; (ii) a task force comprised of the heads of CDC, FDA and NIH is to make ongoing recommendations to HHS on how to improve vaccine safety – but that task force was disbanded in 1998; and (iii) a list of HHS’s vaccine safety duties – but its failure to perform the simple foregoing duties belie its performance regarding this far harder duty. Finally, with regard to FDA and CDC’s independent vaccine advisory committees, VRBPAC and ACIP, a House Report from 2000 found that “[t]he overwhelming majority of members, both voting members and consultants, have substantial ties to the pharmaceutical industry.” An HHS Inspector General report from 2009 found similar issues. Our recent investigation of committee members revealed similar issues. These structural conflicts in regulating vaccines, whereby regulators view themselves and in fact conduct themselves like partners with pharmaceutical companies when it comes to vaccines (rather than regulators), have deepened since 1986 and are the framework into which Covid-19 vaccines were developed and licensed (as discussed herein) and regulated thereafter (as discussed below).

@AaronSiriSG - Aaron Siri

5.Examples of Structural Conflicts Impacting Covid-19 Vaccine Trials Clinical trials are supposed to be statistical comparisons of the outcomes of those in the experimental group as compared to those in the placebo group. This avoids, inter alia, the introduction of bias into the trial. (i)Deaths In Experimental v. Placebo Groups This statistical comparison approach was used when comparing symptomatic cases in the experimental group (8 cases) and placebo group (162 cases) in Pfizer’s Covid-19 vaccine trial to arrive at a 95% efficacy figure. (It is noted there were 3,410 suspected but unconfirmed cases not included in this analysis, the impact of which remains unknown. ) However, when it came to deaths in the trial, the statistical comparison approach was abandoned and instead each death was judged subjectively. In July 2021, Pfizer’s published study reported 15 deaths in the vaccinated group and 14 in the placebo group (including 9 cardiovascular deaths in the vaccinated group versus 5 cardiovascular related deaths in the placebo group). In November 2021, FDA’s published report of Pfizer’s trial stated that “there were a total of 38 deaths, 21 in the COMIRNATY [Pfizer’s Covid-19 vaccine] group and 17 in the placebo group. None of the deaths were considered related to vaccination.” Hence, a statistical comparison was conducted when the data supported the desired conclusion but a subjective assessment when it didn’t. We therefore asked the FDA: “Why are the death data from a randomized controlled trial (‘RCT’) treated like a clinical case-series rather than an RCT when it comes to assessing causality?” FDA responded that it was “unable to respond substantively at this time due to resource constraints and the ongoing pandemic response.” (ii)Pfizer Fails to Disclose Serious Adverse Events, FDA Takes No Action The data submitted to FDA is also unreliable as seen from the case of Maddie de Garay. Maddie is now 15 years old and was seriously injured in Pfizer’s Covid-19 clinical trial for 12-15-year-olds, which included only 1,131 children who received the shot. Maddie’s injuries left her wheelchair-bound and reliant upon a feeding tube, yet Pfizer classified her severe injuries as mere “functional abdominal pain” in its emergency use authorization submission to FDA. On behalf of Maddie, my firm wrote to FDA four times and provided her medical records, and the de Garays submitted their own comment to FDA about this falsity. Neither our firm nor the de Garays received any response until February 26, 2022, 128 days after we first contacted FDA. FDA’s response contained no explanation for the agency’s over 4-month-long delay in responding and, instead, merely suggested that the de Garays file a VAERS report. The de Garays had already done so, which raises serious concern about the claim that “FDA takes all reports of adverse events potentially related to vaccines seriously” as it contends. We separately commenced a lawsuit on September 3, 2022 against HHS for FDA’s internal communications related to Maddie de Garay. It revealed that on June 24, 2021, in response to inquiries from the public, FDA finally asked Pfizer about Maddie de Garay. On June 30, 2021, Pfizer for the first time disclosed to FDA Maddie’s serious adverse events, including being wheelchair bound and needing a feeding tube. But Pfizer’s report concluded that “the PI [principal investigator] did not feel that the subject’s symptology [sic] was consistent with a vaccine related adverse event.” As reflected in the email chain, FDA appears to simply accept this conclusion. All serious adverse events in a clinical trial, whether the sponsor considers them related to the product or not, must be reported to FDA. That the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine causes an injury should not be surprising – injuries from pharmaceutical products occur. What is concerning is that FDA appears unfazed by Pfizer’s failure to adequately disclose this serious injury. FDA should have taken serious issue with this conduct, and its failure to do so reflects the close partnership between FDA and Pfizer. That Pfizer faced no ramifications for failing to accurately and adequately disclose Maddie’s adverse event, in a clinical trial in which just over 1,000 children received the investigational vaccine, leaves open the question of how many other serious injuries were omitted from the data reported by Pfizer to FDA. (Also note that FDA continues to withhold records in its possession concerning Pfizer’s 12–15-year-old trial in which Maddie participated.)

@AaronSiriSG - Aaron Siri

6.Preventing Transmission, an Example of Dogma Driving Policy CDC and FDA should not have been surprised the Covid-19 vaccines did not prevent transmission because even most vaccines mandated for school do not prevent infection and transmission, including inactivated polio vaccine, acellular pertussis vaccine, tetanus vaccine, and meningococcal vaccine. Nor are we aware of a single non-live vaccine for a respiratory infection, like Covid-19 vaccines, that prevents transmission and infection. As FDA explains, “FDA’s authorization and licensure standards for vaccines do not require demonstration of the prevention of infection or transmission.” FDA nonetheless promoted the belief that the Covid-19 vaccines products could do just that, including in the numerous “Just a Minute” promotional videos released by Dr. Peter Marks in late 2021 and early 2022. This occurred despite a CDC study, dated August 6, 2021, which found vaccinated individuals had a higher rate of infection and more viral carriage in their nasopharynx than the unvaccinated. With the release of this study, the CDC Director stated on CNN that “what they [Covid-19 vaccines] can’t do anymore is prevent transmission.” Then, on August 24, 2021, a study by the Wisconsin Health Department reviewed swab specimens in 24 counties and found high viral loads in “158 of 232 unvaccinated (68%...) and 156 of 225 fully vaccinated (69%...) symptomatic individuals” and in “7 of 24 unvaccinated (29%...) and 9 of 11 fully vaccinated asymptomatic individuals (82%...).” Our exchange with CDC in mid to late 2021 brought into focus the foregoing. Nonetheless, the implication these products could prevent infection and transmission persisted, including in a Pfizer report to the FDA on October 26, 2021, stating: “Maximizing the proportion of the population that is vaccinated is critically important to help reduce rates of infection, decrease transmission, prevent the emergence of new variants of concern, and hasten the end of the pandemic.” Despite the lack of clinical evidence to support these claims, FDA permitted Pfizer to continue to make them.

@AaronSiriSG - Aaron Siri

7.FDA and CDC Hide Concerning Post-Licensure Safety Data from Public CDC’s website states that: "[COVID-19] vaccines are monitored by VAERS and several other vaccine safety monitoring systems as part of the most intensive vaccine safety monitoring effort in U.S. history. This continuous, robust safety monitoring helps keep COVID-19 vaccines safe and helps ensure the benefits of vaccination continue to outweigh any risks." The other safety monitoring systems are V-safe, CISA, and VSD. (i)VAERS To monitor vaccine safety, federal health authorities heavily rely on the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (“VAERS”), a passive vaccine safety surveillance system to which reports of adverse events after vaccination can be submitted. VAERS is co-managed by CDC and FDA. On December 4, 2020, before the first Covid-19 vaccine was rolled out, CDC released the VAERS Standard Operating Procedures for Covid-19 (“VAERS SOP”), which states in relevant part: "The analyses for COVID-19 vaccine safety signals will focus on identifying deviations from preliminary safety data, and possibly from other vaccines, using disproportionality analyses and comparisons of reporting rates. Two main approaches to data mining are Proportional Reporting Ratios (PRRs) and Empirical Bayesian Geometric Means. Both have published literature suggesting criteria for detecting “signals”. PRR will be used at CDC for potential signal detection; Empirical Bayesian data mining will be performed by FDA." This SOP made clear that CDC planned to conduct safety signal monitoring using Proportional Reporting Ratios (“PRR”) and FDA planned to conduct safety signal monitoring using Empirical Bayesian (“EB”) data mining. Our firm requested the PRR signal detection data from CDC through FOIA and was denied. In the denial letter, CDC stated that it had not conducted PRR analyses; it instead highlighted the superiority of and historical use of EB data mining, calling it the “gold standard” and the “superior method” with which to detect safety signals. However, on September 2, 2022, then-CDC Director Rochelle Walensky sent a letter to Senator Ron Johnson acknowledging that PRR had in fact been used: “CDC performed PRR analysis between March 25, 2022, through July 31, 2022, to corroborate the results of EB data mining. Notably, results from PRR analysis were generally consistent with EB data mining, revealing no additional unexpected safety signals.” Our firm then sued CDC based on this admission and ultimately received 51 excel files containing PRR data. These files showed that CDC’s own threshold for triggering a signal for adverse events was more than met for numerous serious adverse events, including as seen in the following CDC tables noting that CDC considered, when truth was original, anything above a “2” in the PRR row a safety signal, as provided in the VAERS SOP: When the CDC was confronted with the above data it sought to hide from the public, it advised Senator Johnson that it was no longer relying upon PRR and instead would only rely upon FDA’s EB data mining; as CDC Director wrote to Senator Johnson: “CDC and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) chose to rely on Empirical Bayesian (EB) data mining—a more robust technique used to analyze disproportionate reporting—rather than PRR calculations to mitigate potential false signals. . . . Given the strength of the EB data mining method, CDC and FDA plan to continue relying upon EB data mining moving forward.” Given that CDC decided to abandon the PRR data and rely instead solely on the EB data, our firm requested the EB data mining results from FDA through FOIA and was denied. Hence, we commenced litigation and the FDA filed a motion requesting that the litigation be stayed for at least 18 months due to the agency being overwhelmed as a result of another court order, issued to our client and litigated by our firm, that ordered FDA to disclose all of the clinical trial documents related to the Pfizer and Moderna Covid-19 vaccines’ licensures. The Court granted the stay for 6 months and then recently granted an additional 6 months. To date, FDA has refused to produce the EB data mining results to the public despite the concerning results shown in the PRR data and despite the fact that it has already located and identified at least 150 records (75 emails and 75 excel files) that are responsive to the request. (ii)V-safe: V-safe is CDC’s premier system for tracking the safety of COVID-19 vaccines. It is a smartphone-based program that allows vaccine recipients to “tell CDC about any side effects after getting the COVID-19 vaccine.” Its purpose, as explained by CDC, “is to rapidly characterize the safety profile of COVID-19 vaccines when given outside a clinical trial setting and to detect and evaluate clinically important adverse events and safety issues that might impact policy or regulatory decisions.” On November 19, 2020, CDC published a protocol for developing v-safe titled “V-safe active surveillance for COVID-19 vaccine safety” which explained that “[t]he purpose of v-safe surveillance is to rapidly characterize the safety profile of COVID-19 vaccines when given outside a clinical trial setting and to detect and evaluate clinically important adverse events and safety issues that might impact policy or regulatory decisions.” V-safe was launched simultaneously with the EUA of the first COVID-19 vaccine in December 2020. Nine million of the approximate 10 million users who registered for v-safe did so between December 2020 and April 2021. The data submitted by 10 million v-safe users is likely a good reflection of the experience of the larger population of 265 million Americans who received at least one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine. V-safe collected a limited amount of safety information from its approximately 10 million users using check-the-box options. However, the program also provided a few free-text fields for users to provide additional safety information. CDC received at least 7.8 million free-text entries from v-safe users. Regarding symptoms collected using check-the-box options, v-safe users are asked to select one or more of 10 listed symptoms that occurred within the first week after vaccination. These symptoms are those that CDC says are normal after vaccination and are actually a sign the vaccine is working by producing an immune response. As CDC explains: “Any side effects from getting the vaccine are normal signs the body is building protection.” The 10 million v-safe users reported over 70 million check-the-box symptoms and this, as expected, did not raise any concerns for CDC as seen from the numerous studies CDC published with this data evidencing these high rates. The only other check-the-box safety information collected was whether users reported needing medical care, missed school or work, or could not perform normal daily activities. If a user selected that he or she needed medical care, the user was asked to select whether he or she sought telehealth, urgent care, emergency care, or were hospitalized. Since 2021, CDC has published dozens of studies to support its claim that COVID-19 vaccines are safe. The main data used in these studies is v-safe’s health impact data, with a focus on the rate of people who reported needing medical care after the vaccine. The studies formed the core of CDC’s support for the safety of COVID-19 vaccines, however, they only report the first week of health impact data after injection. This is, at best, highly misleading because CDC is well aware that injuries from COVID-19 vaccines can occur well after the first week. When CDC finally released the check-the-box data to the public, after over two years of legal demands and a federal lawsuit brought by our firm, the data it hid from the public for over two years showed that 7.7% of v-safe users reported needing medical care after a Covid-19 vaccine (and on average 2 to 3 times per person) and an additional 25% of v-safe users reported missing school or work or being unable to perform normal activities after the injection. CDC could have made v-safe a rapid and robust safety system by simply including check-the-box options for adverse events of concern (e.g., a check-the-box option for myocarditis or chest pain). In fact, the first version of the V-Safe Protocol, prior to the program’s launch, identified adverse events of special interest (“AESI”) in a chart titled Prespecified Medical Conditions: Despite CDC itself directly identifying these adverse events as harms of special interest, it did not include check-the-box options for these harms or for common symptoms from these harms. CDC could have taken advantage of this incredible opportunity – wherein v-safe was already capturing health data from over 10 million users – to easily include these AESIs as check-the-box options for v-safe users. This would have enabled CDC and the scientific community to easily calculate a rate for which v-safe users had myocarditis, or other adverse events that had been prespecified by CDC as potential problems (e.g., strokes, seizures, etc.). Instead, CDC chose to limit potential reporting of any such adverse events to the free-text fields knowing that, among other issues, fewer people would report issues in a free-text field (versus a check-the-box option) and this free-text data would be more difficult to standardize. In that regard, it does not appear that CDC designed this system with the interests of the public in mind, but rather its own interest to assure control of the data so it can release only data which comports with its a priori policy decision that these products are “safe.” Nonetheless, a FOIA for the free-text data was submitted and was also heavily litigated initially by another group, and thereafter our firm got involved in that litigation as well and, ultimately, we obtained a Court order that requires CDC to produce the millions of free-text fields on a rolling basis. That production has begun and continues today and through the end of this year. (iii)CISA CDC regularly claims that the Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment (“CISA”) is a critical part of the safety monitoring of vaccines. CDC describes CISA as: “a national collaborating network of vaccine safety experts from the CDC’s Immunization Safety Office (ISO), eight medical research centers, and other partners” that was established “to improve the understanding of adverse events following immunization at the individual patient level.” CISA, like the other safety surveillance programs, is also problematic for a few reasons. For one, as CDC states, “CISA provides consultations for U.S. healthcare providers with complex vaccine safety questions about their patients.” Our firm has heard time and again during the Covid-19 vaccine rollout that many people who suffered adverse events after their vaccination were not believed or being treated by their doctors. Many in the medical field would not acknowledge that the injury could potentially be a vaccine injury and so those people were unable to utilize CISA as it provides consultations only to healthcare providers and not to individual patients. Moreover, the Principal Investigator of CISA, Dr. Katherine Edwards, was a paid advisor to Pfizer, was compensated by numerous other pharmaceutical companies as a consultant and/or advisor, and also was one of five members of Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine trial’s data safety monitoring board. As explained by bioethicist Arthur Caplan, these boards are “very powerful. They’re key guardians of science and safety and are as important if not more important than the FDA.” Dr. Edwards had a close look at the Pfizer vaccine trial and the ability to stop the trial if there were safety concerns. Following the release of that same product, she was consulting with healthcare providers as to whether or not that same product was the cause of their patients’ serious injuries. This conflict casts serious doubt on the entire CISA program. (iv)VSD The Vaccine Safety Datalink is used by CDC and FDA to assess the safety of vaccines. VSD uses electronic health data from participating healthcare organizations and networks throughout the country. The VSD was once maintained at HHS but HHS moved the VSD to a health industry trade association starting in 2001 to avoid having the VSD data subject to FOIA, and to otherwise assure that only the scientists and studies of which it approves utilize the VSD. Thus, when a VSD study is conducted by HHS, in violation of basic scientific standards and process, the underlying raw data is almost never available for inspection by the public and other scientists. So while VSD data is heavily cited and relied upon by the federal health authorities, there is no public access to the data. There are other concerns with VSD as well, such as its lack of ability to assess the long-term impacts of vaccination and its use by the same agency that must defend against claims of vaccine harms, as discussed above.

@AaronSiriSG - Aaron Siri

Full version with footnotes available at: https://judiciary.house.gov/sites/evo-subsites/republicans-judiciary.house.gov/files/evo-media-document/Siri%20Testimony.pdf Link to video of full hearing: https://judiciary.house.gov/committee-activity/hearings/follow-science-oversight-biden-covid-19-administrative-state-response

Follow the Science?: Oversight of the Biden Covid-19 Administrative State Response judiciary.house.gov

@SharylAttkisson - Sharyl Attkisson 🕵️‍♂️💼🥋

(READ) Whistleblower: Remdesivir linked to 601 military deaths https://sharylattkisson.com/2024/10/read-whistleblower-remdesivir-linked-to-601-military-deaths/

(READ) Whistleblower: Remdesivir linked to 601 military deaths | Sharyl Attkisson Whistleblower exposes 601 military deaths linked to remdesivir, alleging data manipulation and lack of informed consent. sharylattkisson.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

10 Shocking Stories the Media Buried Today #10 - Pfizer Accused of HIDING Deaths in COVID Vaccine Trials Damning new allegations have surfaced from researchers at @DailyClout who analyzed Pfizer’s clinical trial data. Anesthetist Dr. Jayanthi Kunadhasan and others claim Pfizer concealed the death of a Kansas trial participant who passed away 41 days after receiving her second dose of the vaccine. The participant’s death, along with other serious adverse events, was allegedly excluded from critical FDA discussions leading to the vaccine’s Emergency Use Authorization. Additionally, it was discovered that the death reporting rate in the placebo group was 80% (4 out of 5), while it was only 33% (2 out of 6) in the vaccinated group. This discrepancy raises a critical question: Was Pfizer deliberately HIDING deaths to make its vaccine appear safer than it actually is? In a scathing rebuke, cardiologist Dr. Aseem Malhotra reacted to the allegations against Pfizer, stating: “Pfizer covered up vaccine deaths, research team alleges. This is exactly why I coined the term ‘psychopathic determinants of health.’ Evidence points towards a crime against humanity by a psychopathic entity...” Read the full report from @DailyClout below.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

FULL REPORT: Pfizer Did Not Disclose a Kansas Vaccinated “Sudden Cardiac Death” from Its COVID-19 Clinical Trial https://dailyclout.io/pfizer-did-not-disclose-a-kansas-vaccinated-sudden-cardiac-death-from-its-covid-19-clinical-trial-dr-jeyanthi-kunadhasans-letter-to-kansas-attorney-general-kris-kobach/ (See 9 More Revealing Stories Below)

Pfizer Did Not Disclose a Kansas Vaccinated "Sudden Cardiac Death" from Its COVID-19 Clinical Trial - Dr. Jeyanthi Kunadhasan's Letter to Kansas Attorney General Kris Kobach RE: Undisclosed Vaccinated Death from Kansas in the C4591001 Trial at the Vaccine and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) dailyclout.io

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#9 - NY Mayor Eric Adams stuns a room full of liberal reporters with a blunt reality check about open borders and their link to sex trafficking. “We have 500,000 children who had sponsors in this country that we can’t find. We can’t find them. We don’t know if they’re doing child labor. We don’t know if they’re doing sex crimes. We don’t know if they’re being exploited.” “500,000 children,” he reiterated. “We don’t know where they are right now in this country.”

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#8 - John Fetterman slams legal cases against Trump and Hunter Biden in first Truth Social post. “Cases were both bullsh*t.” The lawmaker’s post read, “My first truth. The Trump hush money and Hunter Biden cases were both bulls—, and pardons are appropriate. Weaponizing the judiciary for blatant, partisan gain diminishes the collective faith in our institutions and sows further division.” Read More: https://nypost.com/2024/12/11/media/fetterman-slams-legal-cases-against-trump-hunter-biden-in-first-truth-social-post/

Fetterman slams legal cases against Trump, Hunter Biden in first Truth Social post: ‘Cases were both bulls—‘ Sen. John Fetterman, D-Pa., made a serious social media splash on Tuesday, becoming the first Democratic U.S. senator to post on President-elect Donald Trump’s platform, "Truth Social." nypost.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#7 - Rep. Thomas Massie believes the US government orchestrated—or at the very least facilitated—regime change in Syria. “The timing is definitely not a mistake.” Massie pointed out how dozens of jets and helicopters were conveniently bombed by Israel the same week that regime change occurred in Syria. “Basically, what these terrorists couldn’t do, other people in the Middle East hurried up and did here in this last week to make sure that Assad didn’t have the typical resources that a government would have to respond to these threats,” Massie explained. “It’s clear as day to me [that the US was involved],” Massie concluded. “And whether it was led by the United States or whether we just encouraged it, the timing is definitely not a mistake. When you find a turtle on a fence post, it didn’t get there by accident.” “Remember, Tulsi Gabbard was in Congress, and she and I collaborated on a lot of these efforts to stop the U.S. meddling in Syria. And now she’s been named as the head of DNI. Well, I think that was the signal to the Deep State to go in for the kill and get this over with because Trump and some of his nominees… are not going to carry on the policies of Obama and the Deep State,” Massie said.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#6 - CNN gets brutalized for pushing a “fake” story about Syria. CNN’s Lauren Cone reported, “A remarkable moment as CNN's Clarissa Ward and her team find a Syrian prisoner left behind in a secret prison, alone and unaware the Assad regime was no more.” However, she was not ready for these comments: “This is the worst propaganda I've ever seen. Low even for you guys.” (@GuntherEagleman) “This is why your network is losing to the Food Network. Fake garbage like this. How about going to NC and covering how the flood victims are being shafted by our own government.” (@Shawn_Farash) “Why is the cell so clean? How did he not hear the guard shooting the lock on the door? Why did he look so "fresh" when he stood up? How did he not die after going four days without water? I have so many questions. This was definitely staged.” (@CilComLFC)

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

While you’re here, remember to follow (@VigilantFox) and hit the bell 🔔 for more daily news roundups.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#5 - Biden Regime Quietly Extends ‘Emergency Declaration’ to Shield Big Pharma and COVID Vaccine Makers From Liability Until 2029 https://vigilantnews.com/post/covid-vaccine-makers-get-another-free-pass-as-biden-administration-extends-liability-shield-through-2029/

COVID Vaccine Makers Get Another Free Pass as Biden Administration Extends Liability Shield Through 2029 The extension comes amid growing calls for the vaccines to be paused or pulled from the market. vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#4 - The government now admits that the FBI had 26 Confidential Human Sources present at the Capitol on January 6th. Most of them committed crimes, yet not a single one has been charged, including three who entered the Capitol Building themselves. Video: @townhallcom

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@townhallcom #3 - Cooking Oils Linked to Surge in Colon Cancer Rates, Doctors Warn https://vigilantnews.com/post/cooking-oils-linked-to-surge-in-colon-cancer-rates-doctors-warn-in-new-study/

Cooking Oils Linked to Surge in Colon Cancer Rates, Doctors Warn RFK Jr. was right! vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#2 - Kash Patel claims ex-CIA Director Gina Haspel paid CIA agents to mislead the public on the origins of COVID-19. “Gina Haspel as Director of the CIA authorized six case officers to be paid off … to lie to the world where COVID came from because it fit the narrative that Fauci and the media wanted out there.” Credit: @TheChiefNerd

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#1 - 'USA' Chants Roar As Trump Rings NYSE Bell After Being Named TIME 'Person Of The Year' Donald Trump has been crowned TIME magazine's Person of the Year after reclaiming the presidency, marking him as only the second U.S. president in history to serve non-consecutive terms. The announcement came on Thursday, placing Trump at the pinnacle of a contentious list of global influencers. Trump’s victory lap included ringing the opening bell at the New York Stock Exchange in Manhattan, where chants of "USA' broke out... Trump is the first president to ring the bell since Ronald Reagan. Read More: https://www.zerohedge.com/political/trump-named-time-person-year-stunning-political-comeback

'USA' Chants Roar As Trump Rings NYSE Bell After Being Named TIME 'Person Of The Year' ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero zerohedge.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@townhallcom BONUS #1 - Lawsuit and Accusations of Rape Against Newsmax Host Ed Henry Unravel After So-Called Victim’s Kinky Sexts Revealed This case illustrates why we must uphold the presumption of innocence until proven guilty. ⚠️ Warning: Explicit Content https://vigilantnews.com/post/lawsuit-and-accusations-of-rape-against-newsmax-host-ed-henry-unravel-after-so-called-victims-kinky-sexts-revealed/

Lawsuit and Accusations of Rape Against Newsmax Host Ed Henry Unravel After So-Called Victim’s Kinky Sexts Revealed The case against Ed Henry has been destroyed. vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@townhallcom BONUS #2 - Moscow Threatens REVENGE After Ukraine Strikes Russia with 6 US-Made Ballistic Missiles https://vigilantnews.com/post/ww3-watch-moscow-vows-revenge-after-ukraine-strikes-russia-with-6-us-made-ballistic-missiles/

WW3 Watch: Moscow Vows Revenge After Ukraine Strikes Russia with 6 US-Made Ballistic Missiles "This attack by Western long-range weapons will not go unanswered..." vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@townhallcom BONUS #3 - The Greatest Medication You Never Heard of https://vigilantnews.com/post/the-greatest-medication-youve-never-heard-of/

The Greatest Medication You’ve Never Heard of It's not ivermectin, and it's not hydroxychloroquine. But it does have something in common with both of those drugs. vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@townhallcom BONUS #4 - Ex-Secret Service Agent Warns of Major Attack on Trump Before Inauguration https://vigilantnews.com/post/ex-secret-service-agent-warns-of-major-attack-on-trump-before-inauguration/

Ex-Secret Service Agent Warns of Major Attack on Trump Before Inauguration “It’s going to be something of a much bigger magnitude" than the two assassination attempts. vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@townhallcom BONUS #5 - The Most Vaxxed Country on Earth Now Faces a Population Crisis https://vigilantnews.com/post/the-most-vaxxed-country-on-earth-now-faces-a-population-crisis/

The Most Vaxxed Country on Earth Now Faces a Population Crisis Sh*t continues to hit the fan. vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@townhallcom Thanks for reading! If you enjoyed this post, please do me a quick favor and follow this page (@VigilantFox) before you go. In other news, a journalist has obtained a copy of a hidden report from Pfizer, and the data is not looking good. See it here: https://t.co/g5kZ1sWGLb

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

10 Shocking Stories the Media Buried Today #10 - Hidden Pfizer Report Shows Heart Conditions Getting WORSE Over Time Nick Hunt has uncovered what regulators are desperate to hide—and the results are jaw-dropping. Compared to the unvaccinated, vaxxed individuals face: • A 23% higher risk of acute cardiovascular injury, with the gap worsening over time. • A 27% higher risk of arrhythmia. • A 2% higher risk of heart failure, though not yet statistically significant. • A 30% higher risk of stress cardiomyopathy. • A 40% higher risk of coronary artery disease, with risks increasing over time. • A 130% higher risk of myocarditis (within 21 days). With results like this, it’s no wonder they’re desperately trying to keep this information hidden from the public. (See the full report and nine more revealing stories below)

@judyannaggie - judyann451

Moderna buried child's death in COVID booster trial in EU report, FDA response called 'misleading' https://justthenews.com/government/federal-agencies/moderna-buried-childs-death-covid-booster-trial-eu-report-fda-response?utm_medium=social_media&utm_source=twitter_social_icon&utm_campaign=social_icons via @JustTheNews

Moderna buried child's death in COVID booster trial in EU report, FDA response called 'misleading' Stock-plunging mRNA vaccine maker, already in bed with feds on vaccine royalties, says booster not "causally" related without giving evidence. Investigations have found feds rarely enforce mandatory disclosure regulations. justthenews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

EXPOSED: The Chilling SSRI Link to Mass Shootings In the early 1990s, major media outlets openly reported on the connection between Prozac, suicide, and murder. The public was warned that SSRIs could trigger mass violence. But then, in 1997, everything changed. What happened? And why did the media go silent? 🧵 THREAD

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

📌 Before we dive in, bookmark this thread. Only by uncovering the past can you truly understand how to repair the broken, corrupted system we’re living with today.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Big Pharma gaslit the world for decades. They said SSRIs are the silver bullet. They said they didn’t cause psychotic violence. Mentally ill people were just already dangerous. midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-evidence…

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

But hidden clinical trial data, black-box warnings, and bone-chilling real-world cases tell a completely different story. The truth is, SSRIs are not just correlated with violence—they cause it.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

The FDA fought tooth and nail to block warning labels for SSRIs. Only after mass public pressure and mountains of evidence did a suicide warning finally get added—proving some level of causation.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

But as @MidwesternDoc's report details, they knew the truth all along. midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-evidence…

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

SSRIs like Prozac, Zoloft, and Paxil don’t just block serotonin—they hijack the brain’s reward system. It’s a lot like cocaine. After Prozac hit the market in 1988, the FDA received 39,000 adverse event reports. Really significant things like suicides, psychosis, and murders. And that was only the beginning.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc With so many red flags after it hit the market, you would have expected Prozac to be pulled. If not to protect people by regulating drugs, what exactly is the FDA for?

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc To truly understand how deep the corruption runs, check out @MidwesternDoc’s article exposing the FDA for what it really is. https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-fdas-war-on-americas-health

The FDA's War On America's Health Why do so many innovative therapies never see the light of day midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

They’ve tried to hide the evidence, but the truth is: Mass shootings and SSRIs are heavily intertwined. There’s a clear pattern in mass shootings. Whenever a shooter’s medical history becomes public, psychiatric drugs are almost always involved—and it’s usually SSRIs. But after Big Pharma started buying up media ads in 1997, those details somehow got buried.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

You’ve seen the claims and the memes connecting mass shooters to SSRIs. You’ve probably seen the way the media responds. And maybe you’ve believed them. But the truth is clear. It’s not a conspiracy theory—it’s a coverup. SSRIs quietly reprogram normal people into ticking time bombs by triggering something called akathisia. Akathisia is a torturous state of inner restlessness and suicidal rage. Yikes.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Clearly, akathisia is no joke. It’s so unbearable that people describe it as feeling "possessed" or attacked by "dark forces." Patients under akathisia often commit acts of suicide or homicide—and some even have no memory of the events afterward. And this is apparently okay according to the FDA.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc Watch this heartbreaking video of David Carmichael who killed his 11-year-old son while on SSRIs. He is now an outspoken critic of the drugs. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dwJ1TJSa7Ao

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Multiple court cases have exposed pharmaceutical giants like GSK and Pfizer. Internal documents revealed they knew their drugs caused violence and suicide. And what did they do? They hid it from the public. Juries have even found them liable for murder. But the drugs have stayed on the market anyway. If you were prescribed a medication that may make you commit suicide or homicide… would you want to be warned? I think the answer is obvious.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc @MidwesternDoc's report reveals that clinical trials showed SSRIs caused psychotic violence (ie. suicides) but the industry hid the evidence until lawsuits revealed the truth. https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-evidence-ssri-antidepressants

The Decades of Evidence SSRI Antidepressants Cause Mass Shootings How Dangerous Must a Drug Be Before it is Pulled from the Market? midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Here are some real examples from real lawsuits: Donald Schell, aged 60, took Paxil for only 48 hours before killing his family and himself. For the very first time, a jury found a pharma firm liable for deaths caused by antidepressant use. Kurt Danysh, who had no history of violence and was inappropriately prescribed Prozac, shot and killed his own father after 17 days of taking the drug. In 1996, Kurt was convicted of murder. But then, in 2004, it was exposed that Eli Lilly hid data that Prozac can cause violent behavior. After 24 years of hard work, Kurt was finally released from prison. Kim Witczak (@woodymatters) had a wrongful death, failure to warn lawsuit against Pfizer after her husband killed himself after taking Zoloft for 5 weeks. After filing the lawsuit, Pfizer sent investigators out to snoop into Kim’s private life. They even talked to her neighbors. In Canada, a judge ruled that Prozac led to the murder of a teen at the hands of his 16-year-old friend.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc And what did the FDA do with all of this evidence? They covered it up. They gaslit parents, buried warnings, ignored rampant trial fraud, and stonewalled Congress. It’s basically the same playbook they ran during COVID.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Mass shooting after mass shooting shows the pattern: • Columbine shooter: SSRIs • Red Lake, Minnesota shooter: An unusually high SSRI dose • Wahluke, Washington: SSRIs that cause hallucinations • Parkland shooter: psychiatric meds • Nashville shooter: psychiatric meds confirmed • And many, many more. In the 1990s, school shootings suddenly shifted from rare to frequent. The timeline overlaps with the introduction of SSRIs into the US market. And yet the media's silence grows louder with every tragedy.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc For a glimpse into what some of these shooters may have experienced, watch this video of Cory Baadsgaard who took a loaded rifle to school after developing SSRI-induced hallucinations. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WlnMOee82gA

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

And it's not just shootings. Thousands of akathisia-driven murders and suicides have happened quietly across the country. And many others taking the drugs who don’t become violent have felt as though they’re slowly losing their minds. It’s a terrifying thing to experience. Victims and families were left ruined while Big Pharma raked in $17 billion a year off SSRIs alone.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc @MidwesternDoc’s report exposes a shocking truth: clinical trials showed that SSRIs caused psychotic violence and suicide—but the industry hid the evidence for years, until lawsuits finally forced it into the light. https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-evidence-ssri-antidepressants

The Decades of Evidence SSRI Antidepressants Cause Mass Shootings How Dangerous Must a Drug Be Before it is Pulled from the Market? midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Unfortunately, stopping SSRIs can be very challenging and even deadly. If you're on an SSRI, never stop suddenly. Withdrawal can be catastrophic—leading to severe depression, psychosis, or violent behavior. Tapering off very slowly under expert care is absolutely critical. Big Pharma and your doctor probably never told you that part. And they probably don’t mind that their patients (or should I say customers) struggle and often fail to quit.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

SSRIs are a billion-dollar weapon of mass destruction. These drugs are not only harmful but have directly caused psychotic violence, including mass shootings. The FDA helped cover it up. The media silenced the victims. And once again, the price was paid in blood. How many more need to die before we stop putting profits over people?

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc Thanks for reading! This information was based on a report originally published by @MidwesternDoc. Key details were streamlined and editorialized for clarity and impact. Read the original report here. https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-evidence-ssri-antidepressants

The Decades of Evidence SSRI Antidepressants Cause Mass Shootings How Dangerous Must a Drug Be Before it is Pulled from the Market? midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc For a deeper dive into what modern medicine has overlooked—or intentionally buried—check out these other eye-opening reports by @MidwesternDoc: The Forgotten Cancer Cure Hiding in Plain Sight https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-forgotten-cancer-cure-hiding

The Forgotten Cancer Cure Hiding in Plain Sight How DMSO turns a common dye into a highly potent cancer treatment that's harmless to normal tissue midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc Why Do Vaccines Cause Autism? https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/why-do-vaccines-cause-autism

Why Do Vaccines Cause Autism? Past discoveries that can help us understand the current wave of neurological injuries and the silence surrounding them midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc What’s The Healthiest Water To Drink? https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/whats-the-healthiest-water-to-drink

What's The Healthiest Water To Drink? April's Open Thread midwesterndoctor.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@MidwesternDoc While you’re at it, give @MidwesternDoc a follow. No one brings more research, clinical insight, or historical context when it comes to exposing the health myths we’ve all been fed. This is easily one of the most valuable accounts you’ll ever follow. —> @MidwesternDoc https://t.co/BSCAk7IvxZ

@IamBrookJackson - Brook Jackson 💜

BREAKING: Commit Fraud in a Clinical Trial? You Will Go to Jail...unless you are Pfizer! 🔴Data falsification: Trial results were fabricated undermining the entire drug approval process. ⚠️ FDA was misled: The agency was fed false data that could have shaped regulatory decisions. 💊 Health risk: These trials involved asthma drugs used by millions. 💰 Motive? Money. Like always. But unlike the small fish who get charged, Pfizer walks away untouched—again. https://ourcommunitymedia.org/us-news/owners-of-clinical-research-facility-plead-guilty-to-fraud-in-asthma-drug-trials/

Owners of Clinical Research Facility Plead Guilty to Fraud in Asthma Drug Trials Owners of a Florida clinical research facility plead guilty to wire fraud conspiracy, admitting to manipulating clinical trials on asthma drugs. ourcommunitymedia.org

@newstart_2024 - Camus

Dr. Joel Wallskog’s Harrowing Testimony on COVID Vaccine Injuries—A Call for Accountability & Justice For 19 years, Dr. Joel Wallskog was a successful orthopedic surgeon in Wisconsin. Then, on December 30, 2021, he received the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine. Within a week, his life changed forever. Leg weakness. Numbness. Loss of balance. Repeated falls. Diagnosed with transverse myelitis, autonomic dysfunction, and an unspecified immune disorder, he was forced into medical retirement. His providers didn’t even connect his condition to the vaccine. Now, as co-chair of REACT19—a science-based nonprofit representing nearly 40,000 Americans injured by COVID vaccines—Dr. Wallskog is fighting for acknowledgment, research, and justice. The Disturbing Truth About COVID Vaccines in Kids & Pregnant Women - Clinical trials were rushed. Safety data was withheld or altered. Follow-up periods as short as two weeks were deemed acceptable. - Maddie DeGaray, 14 at the time, was severely injured in Pfizer’s Phase 3 trial at Cincinnati Children’s Hospital. Her symptoms—reduced to a "stomachache" in trial data—left her wheelchair-bound, using a feeding tube at 17. - VAERS & V-Safe failed. Were these systems designed to underreport? - Pregnant women & children were given experimental shots—violating centuries of medical ethics. The Human Cost of Institutional Failure - Thousands of injured Americans have been gaslit, ignored, or abandoned by the medical system. - Regulatory agencies (FDA, CDC) prioritized promotion over protection, ignoring conflicts of interest. - Science is never settled, yet dissent was silenced. A Call to Action Dr. Wallskog’s mission is clear: ✅ Acknowledge the injured. ✅ Research vaccine injuries. ✅ Provide medical care & compensation for victims. "We’ve had negative reactions—but we seek positive actions." The COVID shots have been removed from childhood schedules for healthy kids—a step forward. But the damage is done. Will America finally take responsibility?

@RealDrJaneRuby - DR JANE RUBY™️

How do you trust a pharmaceutical company to show you "GREAT numbers and success" after that company spent the last five years ignoring millions of American deaths and permanent disability from their products? https://t.co/HfEsn9OfJo

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

DISTURBING: Vietnam just shut down a jaw-dropping 86 MILLION bank accounts overnight, cutting citizens off from their own money for refusing to hand over their biometric data. This is state-enforced digital control, showing just how fast freedom disappears when survival is tied to compliance. Dr. Andrew Kaufman warns Americans not to assume it “can’t happen here.” With REAL ID rolling out and Palantir-linked surveillance expanding, the same playbook is already underway on American soil. In Vietnam, people had “a few months’ warning,” then watched their accounts freeze. Most complied without protest. And that same passive mindset is spreading in the U.S. today. Make no mistake: this is a global test run for total control. The only defense is building a parallel economy—now. Support for local businesses, the use of cash, and holding gold and silver are a must. Because once the switch flips here, our freedom won’t come back. Watch the full episode:👇 https://rumble.com/v6zbql2-uk-to-launch-digital-id-86m-bank-accounts-shut-down-fdas-shock-admission-da.html

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

#ad: Get your FREE copy of The Bible and Gold at http://goldbiblepulse.com. In this faith-based book, Alin Armstrong explores biblical principles of fair trade, honesty, and sound money. “Unequal weights are an abomination to the Lord,” he writes, reminding us that since Eden, gold has been God’s standard for honest money—a safeguard no one can print away or corrupt. Discover these timeless principles for yourself—get your FREE copy now at http://goldbiblepulse.com. DISCLOSURE: This ad was paid for by Genesis Gold Group. We may earn a small commission when you shop through our sponsors. Thank you for your support.

Gold Bible – Secured My Wealth genesisgold.securedmywealth.com

Gold Bible – Secured My Wealth genesisgold.securedmywealth.com

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Meanwhile in the UK, the government is racing to impose a dystopian digital ID—one that decides whether you can work, bank, or even go online. This goes far beyond immigration. It’s about control over every aspect of your life. Minister Liz Kendall admitted it outright: digital ID will determine who can access government services—and who can’t. No ID means no access. That isn’t convenience—it’s exclusion. Australia shows us what’s coming next. A rollout pitched as “voluntary” in 2024 has already become mandatory. By next year, Australians won’t even be able to perform a Google search without a digital ID. Now the UK is moving in lockstep, with reports confirming that digital IDs will soon be tied to jobs, housing, and immigration checks. Critics call it the oldest trick in the book: problem, reaction, solution. Open the borders, spark outrage, then use the chaos to push digital ID as the “fix” for the problems they just made. But the ones really being locked out aren’t the migrants—it’s you. This isn’t about stopping illegals. It’s the blueprint of a global control grid—and once the gates slam shut, they rarely open again. Watch the full episode:👇 https://rumble.com/v6zbql2-uk-to-launch-digital-id-86m-bank-accounts-shut-down-fdas-shock-admission-da.html

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

#ad: Want protection from surveillance, hacking, and even electromagnetic threats? The elite Faraday bags at escapezone.com/pulse block GPS, Bluetooth, RFID skimming, and EMF—perfect for phones, laptops, wallets, and more. Their premium ballistic backpack even combines Faraday shielding with Kevlar armor, giving you the upper hand in an unpredictable world. Want to shield your body, too? Try their EMF-blocking beanies and blankets—because protection shouldn’t stop with your phone. Whether it’s for you, your family, or someone you love—don’t leave it to chance. Shop now at escapezone.com/pulse and protect what matters most. DISCLOSURE: This post contains affiliate links. If you make a purchase through them, we may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you. This helps keep our work independent. Thank you for your support.

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Our final story tonight is deeply disturbing. The FDA just admitted it never tested Pfizer and Moderna’s COVID-19 vaccines for DNA fragments, relying solely on the drugmakers’ word. At an official CDC meeting, pediatric cardiologist Kirk Milhoan demanded answers on why the shots remain on the market when independent labs found DNA contamination hundreds of times above legal limits. The FDA admitted it had done zero independent testing and offered no timeline for action. Independent studies led by @Kevin_McKernan and David Speicher revealed excess plasmid DNA—including SV40 sequences linked to cancer research—far beyond FDA and WHO thresholds. Regulators claim there’s “no evidence of harm,” yet a new study found vaccine DNA integrated into the genome of a 31-year-old woman with aggressive bladder cancer. Their admission exposes a chilling truth: regulators aren’t protecting you—they’re protecting Big Pharma. @zeee_media's explosive report uncovers what they don’t want you to see. Watch the full episode:👇 https://rumble.com/v6zbql2-uk-to-launch-digital-id-86m-bank-accounts-shut-down-fdas-shock-admission-da.html

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

#ad: What if the real answers to your health aren’t in your doctor’s office, but in your own hands? While your family doctor may only give you 10 rushed minutes, the FAB 4 docs will equip you with the knowledge you need to heal yourself naturally. https://www.myehialoha.org/ages-fall-conference-2025-make-yourself-healthy-again-myha/#a_aid=VFOX It’s all happening October 23–25 at this year’s Healing for the Ages Annual Conference. Don’t miss your chance to Make Yourself Healthy Again. Save 30% on your virtual ticket today with coupon code VFOX. DISCLOSURE: This post contains affiliate links. If you make a purchase through them, we may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you. This helps keep our work independent. Thank you for your support.

A.G.E.S. '25 AFC | Make Yourself Healthy Again (MYHA) - My EHI Aloha Join our Annual Fall Conference and learn how to Make Yourself Healthy Again (MYHA). myehialoha.org

@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊

Thanks for tuning in. Follow us (@Zeee_Media and @VigilantFox) for stories that matter—stories the media doesn’t want you to see. We’ll be back with another show tomorrow. See you then. Watch the full episode:👇 https://rumble.com/v6zbql2-uk-to-launch-digital-id-86m-bank-accounts-shut-down-fdas-shock-admission-da.html

@newstart_2024 - Camus

A chilling account from Dr. Sabine Hazan. Her last patient of the day: a previously healthy woman. Four days after her COVID booster, she was paralyzed, now wheelchair-bound. This is a serious adverse event, the kind clinical trial veterans recognize immediately. Yet, it went unreported. Dr. Hazan states she sees vaccine injuries "every day," claiming to have hundreds of such cases. Most alarming? She alleges Pfizer contacted this patient in an effort to "mitigate" and silence her story. This isn't an isolated incident. It's a pattern of ignored suffering.