TruthArchive.ai - Related Post Feed
@HansMahncke - Hans Mahncke
This is from June 21, 2021. Putin was more honest about the J6 protesters than the entire US media establishment. https://t.co/hTVaKbIfdF
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker denies ordering the assassination of Alexei Navalny and argues that their country does not have a habit of assassinating people. They also question whether the arrest and detention of 450 individuals who entered the congress with political demands is a form of persecution for their political opinions.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Ask you may I just ask you a direct question? Did you order Alexei Navalny's assassination? Of course not. We don't have this kind of habit of assassinating anybody. That's 1.
Number 2 is I want to ask you, did you order the Assassination of the woman who walked into the congress and who was shot and killed by a policeman. Do you know that 400 And 50 individuals were arrested after entering the congress, and they didn't go there to steal a laptop. They came with political demands. 450 people have been detained. You're talking about a capital They're looking at jail time Between 15 25 years, and they came to the congress with political demands.
Isn't that persecution for political opinions?
@listen_2learn - The Researcher
The CIA mockingbird media is a disgrace. https://t.co/b8AcCN2HJb
Video Transcript AI Summary
The Trump campaign accuses Twitter and Facebook of censorship after the platforms blocked the spread of an unverified story about Joe Biden's son and a laptop allegedly full of his old emails. Experts suggest it resembles a disinformation campaign, potentially orchestrated by Russia. Social media outlets quickly limited the story's spread, with Twitter even suspending the accounts of the Trump campaign and White House press secretary. The intelligence community has warned the White House about Rudy Giuliani's involvement in promoting Russian disinformation. The FBI is investigating whether the unverified emails about Hunter Biden are part of a larger Russian disinformation effort. The president and his allies continue to push the story, while critics argue it is a smear campaign.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The Trump campaign is accusing Twitter and Facebook of censorship after the social media companies blocked the spread of an unverified story about former vice president Joe Biden's son and a laptop allegedly full of his old emails. It's a story raising concerns about whether it's real or just designed to sow confusion in the final weeks of the election.
Speaker 1: Experts say it has all the hallmarks of information laundering.
Speaker 2: This looks like your classic disinformation campaign.
Speaker 1: Eric O'Neil is a former FBI operative.
Speaker 2: Steal the information with a cyber attack, get the emails from Hunter Biden's account, and then put them on these laptops that are left at a repair store. And that's how the information is now laundered into the public.
Speaker 1: Who do you think is behind this?
Speaker 2: Well, the Russians would be my number one guess.
Speaker 1: Social media outlets were quick to limit the spread of the story. Twitter briefly suspending the accounts of the Trump campaign and White House press secretary after they tried to share it.
Speaker 3: Twitter and Facebook have limited the distribution of that Hunter Biden story. And last night, Twitter appeared to suspend the Twitter account of White House press secretary Kayleigh McEnany when she tried to share that story.
Speaker 4: Damn. You know a story is shady when Facebook is saying, woah. Woah. Woah. Woah.
Maybe people shouldn't see this.
Speaker 5: For a long time, Giuliani has been openly working to dig up dirt and promote disinformation on the Bidens. And now the Washington Post is also reporting that the intelligence community was so concerned that the Russians were using Giuliani to feed Russian disinformation to the president that they warned the White House about it last year. We're being told by 2 people who have been briefed on what the FBI is doing is that they're looking into whether these unverified emails about Hunter Biden published by the New York Post about foreign business dealings are part of the bigger Russian disinformation effort, which is well underway in these final days of the 2020 race. The intelligence community has said for months that Russia is very actively engaged in a disinformation campaign in the 2020 election, in particular against Joe Biden to denigrate his campaign in favor of president Trump.
Speaker 6: I think there are a lot of issues related to this New York Post story that quarterly, referenced the Hunter Biden emails. And as, I and several of my former colleagues pointed out publicly that it does bear the hallmarks of Russian disinformation.
Speaker 7: Tell committee chair Adam Schiff, who said this discussion over Hunter Biden the story that came out in the New York Post that is highly questionable and dubiously sourced is part of a Russian disinformation campaign.
Speaker 8: Well, what I can tell you for sure is that Rudy Giuliani was the source of this hard drive and, this information for the New York Post story. Also, the intelligence community has been saying repeatedly that Rudy Giuliani is the vehicle for Russian disinformation right now about Hunter Biden and the Bidens. To say that there's no evidence that somehow these emails and text messages or this hard drive, is part of a, potentially a Russian disinformation campaign doesn't make any sense to me, Hallie.
Speaker 4: Biden story, which we haven't covered as much for journalistic reasons, because of the lack of verification. We don't put unverified disinformation on.
Speaker 9: It's not every day where you see a headline like, former New York City mayor, president's personal lawyer, and longtime friend, White House was warned that Rudy was the target of Russian intelligence operation to feed misinformation to Trump.
Speaker 10: My colleagues at The Post reported tonight, a pretty explosive story, which is that, US intelligence agencies believed that Rudy Giuliani was being worked over by Russian, intelligence assets as a a conduit to feed misinformation to the president of the United States. Apparently, according to US intelligence, the Russians were on to him and and were using Giuliani's interest in Ukraine to feed him, misinformation, to to the president and to try to influence the American political process. And that's a big deal.
Speaker 11: Serious questions tonight about whether the Russians are using Rudy Giuliani to interfere in the US presidential election. Alex, there are fears that what Giuliani is now pushing here in the United States could actually be part of Russia's latest and very massive disinformation campaign in the US presidential election.
Speaker 5: Massive indeed. Wolf, we do know that it's a very active Russian campaign. That's according to the US intelligence community and that Rudy Giuliani already had open contact with a person that the US has called an agent for the Kremlin. Now we are being told by 2 people who've been briefed on, what the FBI is doing that they're looking into whether these unverified emails about Hunter Biden that were published earlier this week by the New York Post about his business dealings in Ukraine and China are part of this bigger Russian disinformation effort in the 2020 election. Now those efforts, according to the intelligence community, are to denigrate the Biden campaign and the former vice president in favor of president Trump.
Speaker 12: Over the past few days, president Trump has highlighted a report by the New York Post about Hunter Biden, Joe Biden's son. There are major questions about the origins and the accuracy of that story. The president's personal attorney was peddling Russian disinformation.
Speaker 13: Former senior intelligence official tells me that president Trump was warned Giuliani's information was likely Russian disinformation by national security adviser, Robert O'Brien, CIA director, Gina Haspel, director of National Intelligence, Joe Maguire, White House counsel, Pat Cipollone, attorney general Bill Barr, all told the president not to trust Giuliani, and this was first reported, Judy, by the Washington. The Biden campaign says that this is Russian disinformation.
Speaker 14: New questions today about an unverified report in the New York Post on Joe Biden's son, Hunter. Among them is Rudy Giuliani, the president's personal lawyer tied to a Russian effort to influence the US election.
Speaker 15: The US spy agencies have gathered intelligence that the president's personal lawyer, Rudy Giuliani, was dealing with alleged Russian intelligence agencies. Last week, Giuliani and former Trump official, Steve Bannon, provided the New York Post with unverified emails, allegedly linking one of Hunter Biden's Ukrainian partners with a possible meeting with Joe Biden when he was vice president, A meeting the Biden campaign says never took place. Experts say the emails cannot be authenticated. Some may have been altered or are fake.
Speaker 16: We have no idea whether or not the emails are legitimate, but this whole operation looks right out of the Kremlin playbook. Hack and dump.
Speaker 0: Tonight, there are growing questions about the man once known as America's mayor, Rudy Giuliani, and if he is being used by Russia to influence the 2020 presidential campaign.
Speaker 3: President Trump on the attack today, going after Joe Biden and his family with dubious accusations.
Speaker 17: I'll tell you what. It's an organized crime family as far as I'm concerned.
Speaker 3: The president is referencing a tabloid newspaper story with emails purportedly swiped from the vice president's son, Hunter. But CBS News has learned the president was personally warned by the national security adviser, Robert O'Brien, that the man who provided the information to the tabloid, his personal attorney, Rudy Giuliani, was the target of a Russian influence campaign aimed at crediting Biden. CBS News has learned the FBI is now looking into whether the information found on the device may be part of a Russian disinformation campaign.
Speaker 16: This looks like Russian intelligence. This walks like Russian intelligence. This talks like Russian intelligence. This effort by Rudy Giuliani and the New York Post and and Steve Bannon to cook up, supposed dirt on Joe Biden looks like a classic Russian playbook disinformation campaign. So when the intelligence community goes in and warns Donald Trump that Rudy Giuliani is being worked over by Russian intelligence, and then Rudy Giuliani suddenly comes forward with these mysteriously, created emails probably hacked through a Russian intelligence operation, we have to acknowledge the fact that the president of the United States is supporting, is condoning, is welcoming a Russian intelligence operation in 2020.
Nicole, this is collusion in plain sight.
Speaker 18: This is, this classic, textbook, Soviet Russian, tradecraft at work. The Russians have analyzed the target. They understand that the president and his enablers crave, dirt on vice president Biden. Whether it's real or contrived, it doesn't matter to them. And so all of a sudden, 2 two and a half weeks before the election, this laptop appears somehow, without and the emails on it without any metadata.
It just it's all very curious. But the so here you have a willing target and the Russians who are very sophisticated about how to exploit a willing target. And, to me, that's what's at work here.
Speaker 14: The FBI says this laptop is not Russian disinformation. So what are you talking about here? This laptop is real? It's not just the laptop. There's other emails.
There's text messages. They are real. So according to the US government I know you've tried to
Speaker 19: move everybody to look at that, but that's not what we're hearing from you.
Speaker 14: Why don't you go to report this? This is the one of the most powerful families in Washington. The Biden family. And you're okay. You're okay with our interests being sold out to profit, Joe Biden and his family when when we're suffering during a pandemic from communist China?
He's doing shady business deals with communist China. You're comfortable. Okay.
Speaker 19: As as you know perfectly well, I'm a journalist and a reporter, and I follow the facts. And there has never been any issues in terms of corruption. Now let me ask you this. Yesterday, the FBI Wait.
Speaker 14: Wait. FBI I do know that.
Speaker 19: I'm talking about reporting and any evidence. I'm talking to you now. Okay. I would love that
Speaker 14: you guys would start doing that thing and start doing that verification.
Speaker 19: We're not gonna do your work for you. I want to ask you a question.
Speaker 16: The FBI It's
Speaker 14: a journalist's country. It's a journalist's job to find out if this is verified.
Speaker 17: I think it's one of the biggest scandals I've ever seen, and you don't cover it. Biggest You wanna insignificant things. I'm telling you. Of course,
Speaker 12: it can be verified.
Speaker 17: She's insignificant things.
Speaker 12: I'm telling you.
Speaker 17: Of course, it can be verified. Excuse me. They found the laptop. Leslie.
Speaker 12: Leslie. Verify.
Speaker 17: What can't be verified?
Speaker 12: The laptop.
Speaker 17: Why you said that?
Speaker 12: Was that your laptop? For real. I don't know. I know. But you know that's
Speaker 20: this is
Speaker 12: I really don't
Speaker 14: know if the
Speaker 12: answer is. You don't know yes or no if the laptop?
Speaker 21: Laptop was yours?
Speaker 12: I don't have any idea. I have no idea whether it
Speaker 22: was yours.
Speaker 12: Of course, certainly. There could be a laptop out there that was stolen from me. There could be that I was hacked. It could be that there was, that it was Russian intelligence. It could be that it was stolen from me.
And you didn't drop off a laptop to
Speaker 1: be repaired No. From Delaware
Speaker 12: Not that I remember at all.
Speaker 22: In October 2020, a New York Post article said that emails purportedly showing shady dealings in Ukraine by Hunter Biden were found on a laptop computer that he supposedly left in a Delaware repair shop in 2019. The details were sketchy at best. And last month, a declassified intelligence report said that before the election, the Russians had launched a smear campaign against Joe Biden and his family.
Speaker 17: Take a look at what's going on, Leslie. And then you say that shouldn't be discussed. I'm saying It's the biggest scandal out there, Leslie.
Speaker 14: And you think it's
Speaker 12: the biggest issue to campaign on? I think it's
Speaker 11: Does it surprise you at all that this information Rudy Giuliani is peddling, very well could be connected to some sort of Russian government disinformation campaign?
Speaker 21: And, you know, the idea that the president, that the White House counsel and others were made well, we know that this whole smear on Joe Biden, comes from the Kremlin. That's been clear for well over a year now that they've been pushing this false narrative about the vice president and his son. Clearly, the origins of this whole, smear, are from the Kremlin, and the president is only too happy to have Kremlin help in in trying to amplify it.
Speaker 11: It's not like Rudy Giuliani is peddling this information in a vacuum, congressman. Take a look at this picture of the president in the old o oval office holding up a copy of the New York Post touting this conspiracy theory. It's made its way all the way to the commander in chief, with a big smile on his face.
Speaker 21: Yes. Well, look. I I you know, I think we know who the driving force behind this smear has been all along, and it's been, the president and the Kremlin. The kremlin has an obvious interest, in denigrating joe biden. They want donald trump to win.
They recognize he's a weak president. He's been unruly unwilling to stand up to putin and other autocrats. He has diminished nato. He has criticized and weakened our alliance, with our transatlantic partners. He's been the gift that doesn't stop giving for the Kremlin.
So, clearly, they wanna help him. So they wanna denigrate the vice president. The intelligence community has made that abundantly clear. And this this particular smear though, has also been acknowledged to come from the Kremlin. And there it is in the Oval Office, another wonderful propaganda coup for Vladimir Putin, seeing the president of the United States holding up a newspaper promoting Kremlin propaganda.
It's really incredible.
Speaker 11: The Washington Post, as you saw, is reporting that, when the president was actually warned of concerns about Giuliani, where he was getting all this information, warned by US intelligence, law enforcement authorities, the president simply shrugged his shoulders and responded, that's Rudy. How much is that part of of the problem here that the president, at least according to this reporting in the Washington Post, doesn't seem to care?
Speaker 17: Well, it's
Speaker 21: a big part of the problem, and, and, you know, we've known for a long time look. Rudy Giuliani, doesn't, you know, run the president. The president runs Rudy Giuliani. Giuliani is doing the president's bidding. He was doing the president's bidding late last year and earlier this year.
In Ukraine, he was doing the president's bidding when he was meeting with an agent of the Kremlin. He was doing the president's bidding when he was pushing out this smear and trying to get the Ukrainians, to push out the smear of his opponent because he was definitely afraid of being exactly where we are right now, which is less than 3 weeks from the election, losing badly to Joe Biden. But, the fact that he would continue to do it, I guess, at this point shouldn't surprise us. But, this is the story of Donald Trump. Utter unwillingness to stand up to the Kremlin, a willingness to use their help no matter how dishonest and disreputable, a willingness to undermine our own elections by getting Kremlin help and amplifying it.
And there's only one remedy at this point, and that's to vote him out.
Speaker 11: Have you, as a member of the gang of 8, the top leadership in the, the congress, the senate, and the house, and members of the intelligence committee. Have you been formally briefed on what the Russians are up to right now in trying to, pedal this kind of information?
Speaker 21: Well, I was, in the intelligence committee today to see what the latest was. And frankly, we haven't gotten much, from the intelligence community very recently, which concerns me. They have, at times, some of the leadership, like the, director Ratcliffe, not been very forthcoming, in terms of the intelligence on the Russian threat and been promoting this false equivalence with other countries. So, you know, I wish I could tell you more, Wolf. I wish the intelligence community was at liberty to tell the public more.
But we do know this. The Russians are once again actively involved in trying to denigrate denigrate the vice president. Donald Trump is helping them. And, and we know that they are amplifying the president's misinformation about absentee ballots. This is another gift the president is giving the Russians.
Unlike 2016 when the Russians had to make up this stuff, they now can simply use the president's own false statements and amplify them. It is extraordinary both that a president of the United States is telling his own citizens and the rest of the world that America can't hold a free and fair election. The Kremlin just has to push out that false narrative by the president of the United States.
Speaker 11: Congressman Adam Schiff, thank you so much for joining us. To be
Speaker 12: to call Biden a criminal. Why is that?
Speaker 20: He is a criminal. He's a criminal. He got caught. Read his laptop. And you know who's a criminal?
You're a criminal for not reporting it. You are a criminal for not reporting it. No, brother. Let me tell you something. Joe Biden is a criminal, and he's been a criminal for a long time, and you're a criminal and the media for not reporting it.
Good luck, everybody. Have a good time.
Speaker 23: The president has said and you have tweeted that allegations of wrongdoing based on files pulled from Hunter Biden's laptop are Russian disinformation. There is a new book by a political reporter that finds some of the files on there are genuine. Is the White House still going with Russian disinformation?
Speaker 24: I think it's broadly known and widely known, Peter, that there was a broad range of Russian disinformation back in 2020.
Speaker 25: Okay. 50 former national intelligence folks who said that what this he's accusing me of is a Russian plan. They have said that this is has all the 4 5 former heads of the CIA, both parties, say what he's saying is a bunch of garbage. This is classic Trump. We have 4 days left, and all of a sudden, there's a laptop.
There's overwhelming evidence that from the intelligence community that the Russians are engaged.
Speaker 4: I still think that the stories from the fall about your son, Tucker, where Russia's disenfranchised as near the end of the campaign said?
Speaker 25: Yes. Yes. Yes. I know you'd asked it. I have no response.
It's another smear campaign. It's the last ditch effort in this desperate campaign to smear me and my family. The vast majority of the intelligence people have come out and said there's no basis at all.
Speaker 12: I get calls from my father to tell me that the New York Times is calling, but my old partner, Eric, who literally has done me harm for I don't know how long, is the one taking the calls because my father will not stop sending the calls to Eric. I have another New York Times reporter calling about my representation of the literally, Becca Patrick Co, the fucking spy chief of China who started the company that my partner, who has worth $323,000,000,000
Speaker 15: founded,
Speaker 12: It is now missing. The richest man in the world is missing who was my partner. He was missing since I last saw him in his $58,000,000 apartment and signed a $4,000,000,000 deal to big build the fucking largest fucking LNG court in the world. And I am receiving calls from the Soviet Union of New York from the US attorney himself. My best friend in business, Devin, has named me as a witness without telling me in a criminal case and my father without telling me.
@TheMilkBarTV - MilkBarTV
How world leaders spoke about Putin before the war in Ukraine. https://t.co/EG8utHIH7H
Video Transcript AI Summary
Two American speakers express trust in Vladimir Putin, with one stating that he found Putin to be straightforward and trustworthy. Another speaker praises Putin for his initial move towards democracy and describes him as very smart. The same speaker also mentions having a good relationship with Putin and states that he kept his word in their agreements. Another speaker acknowledges the challenges faced by the Russian president, including the need for economic restructuring and rebuilding civic society. This speaker believes it is understandable that Putin presents himself as a strong and patriotic leader. Lastly, one speaker expresses confidence in improved cooperation between NATO members and Russia. However, another speaker predicts that Putin will eventually take over all of Ukraine.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Is this a man that Americans can trust? I looked the man in the eye. I found him to be very straightforward and trustworthy. We had a very good dialogue. I was able to, get a sense of his soul.
I wouldn't have invited him to my ranch if I didn't trust him.
Speaker 1: Well, here's Biden 20 years ago praising Vladimir Putin for moving toward democracy. I'm close to amazed by how far Putin seems to have come in making throwing his lot with the West. I don't think anybody since Peter the Great has made such a significant, at least Initial move to the west.
Speaker 2: Mister Putin has got he got all he's very smart.
Speaker 0: Well, you know him better than most people.
Speaker 2: Yeah. I think we had a really good blunt relationship.
Speaker 0: Did Putin ever renege on a personal agreement he made to you?
Speaker 2: He did not.
Speaker 0: So behind closed doors, he could be trusted?
Speaker 2: He kept his word in all the deals we made.
Speaker 3: We have to understand the scale of the problems that the president of Russia has to deal with, and they're unlike any of
Speaker 0: the problems that any
Speaker 3: of the problems that any of the rest of us in in the Western world have to deal with. I mean, he's dealing with an economy that needs absolutely fundamental restructuring, civic Society that needs to be rebuilt after the years of Communism and external relations that have a whole series of historical Legacies that have to be overcome. So I don't think it's surprising that he is and presents himself as a strong leader, as a patriotic leader for Russia.
Speaker 0: I am Confident that this new level of cooperation between NATO's members and Russia will now change the world and for the better.
Speaker 2: I got along with him great. But ultimately, he's gonna take over all of Ukraine.
@orwell2022 - Orwell2024🏒
Once upon a time, the media (even CNN) still knew how to do its job. https://t.co/orLBQiXqH9
Video Transcript AI Summary
Pfizer, a company too big to fail, made a deal with the government to avoid being excluded from Medicare and Medicaid. They created a shell company, Pharmacia and Upjohn Company Incorporated, to take the blame for any convictions. This allowed Pfizer to continue doing business with the federal government. Despite paying a $1.2 billion criminal fine and settling civil suits for $1 billion, Pfizer's punishment may not be enough to deter other big pharma companies from engaging in illegal activities. The fear is that dealing with the Department of Justice is just seen as a cost of doing business.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Just as giant banks on Wall Street were considered too big to fail, Pfizer was considered too big to nail. Why? Because a company convicted of major fraud would automatically be kicked out of Medicare and Medicaid. Pfizer would no longer be allowed to bill any federal health programs for any of its products. It would be a corporate death sentence.
Speaker 1: If a company like Pfizer ex is excluded from Medicare and Medicaid, they're out of business.
Speaker 0: Lewis Morris, a top lawyer at the Department of Health and Human Services, told us Pfizer's collapse could leave 1,000 out of work, Millions not getting their medications.
Speaker 1: We have to ask whether by excluding the company, are we harming our patients? Are we harming the beneficiaries who need these critical drugs?
Speaker 0: Since shutting down Pfizer was unthinkable, Pfizer and the feds cut a deal. And here's how they did it. Pfizer, located here in New York, owns a company named Pharmacia Corporation, which owns another company called Pharmacia and Upjohn LLC, which owns Pharmacia and Upjohn Company LLC, which in turn owns Pharmacia and Upjohn Company Incorporated. And what does Pharmacia and Upjohn Company Incorporated do? Nothing.
It's a shell created to be a legal shield for Pfizer. In other words, if Pfizer was at risk of being convicted, The Shell company would take the hit. Think of it as the great great grandson of the parent company. Birthday, March 27, 2007, just in time to plead guilty in a kickback case Against the company Pfizer had acquired a few years earlier. With that conviction, Pharmacia and Upjohn Company Incorporated, Which had never sold so much as a single pill was excluded from Medicare.
2 years later, When Pfizer was in trouble with Bextra, Pharmacia and Upjohn Company Incorporated, the Shell company, stepped up again and pleaded guilty. It was like having an imaginary friend, an imaginary bad guy to take the rap. And Pfizer, too big to nail, is still doing business with the federal government.
Speaker 1: It is true that if a company is created, to take a criminal plea, but it's just a shell. The impact of an exclusion is minimal or nonexistent.
Speaker 0: Did the punishment fit the crime? Pfizer says yes. It paid nearly $1,200,000,000 in a criminal fine for Bextra, the largest Fine ever. It paid $1,000,000,000 more to settle civil suits, although it denies wrongdoing on allegations it illegally promoted 12 other drugs. In all, Pfizer lost the equivalent of 3 months profit.
But even Mike Lautz, who spent more than a decade prosecuting some of the largest Drug companies in the country isn't sure that $2,000,000,000 is enough to make big pharma clean up its act.
Speaker 2: I worry that the incentives are so great, the money is so great, that that has, maybe made Dealing with us, the Department of Justice, is just a cost of doing business.
@SaltyGoat17 - SaltyGoat
The parallels of THIS👇🏼 and our own STATE RUN MEDIA is undeniable!!! https://t.co/9OgbTAdLaK
Video Transcript AI Summary
Korean dictator Kim Il sung had a large tumor on the back of his neck, which was ignored by North Korean state media. The speaker contrasts this with the belief that in our country, if Joe Biden faced any obvious physical or medical issues, journalists would report on it. They mention scenarios like Biden being unable to complete a sentence, mistaking his sister for his wife, or falling down in public without reason. The speaker believes that in a free country like ours, the New York Times would fulfill its duty by investigating and reporting on such matters, rather than covering them up.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Korean dictator Kim Il sung developed an enormous baseball sized tumor on the back of his neck. It was huge. It was grotesque. It was right there. You couldn't ignore it.
You couldn't possibly not see it. But in North Korea, state media did ignore it. They pretended it didn't exist. And so in some important sense, it didn't. Thankfully, nothing like that is happening in our country or ever will.
If Joe Biden ever developed some profound physical or medical problem that was obvious to everybody, Journalists would say something. This is not North Korea. We don't have state media here. If Joe Biden was, say, incapable of completing a full sentence or mistook his sister for his wife or suddenly started falling down in public for no reason. The New York Times would report on that, And they get to the bottom of what was actually happening.
That would be its duty in a free country like ours. It's not like they would cover it up.
@battleforeurope - Thomas Fazi
The Western coverage of the Ukraine war in a nutshell: from “Putin is finished” to “Putin is winning” in the span of four months. Amazing how these people still have a job. https://t.co/PJ0rrmW3iM
@beinlibertarian - Being Libertarian
If Tucker Carlson interviews Putin how many years will it take for people to analyze what he’s saying in a term that’s even slightly more complex than “good guys vs bad guys?” https://t.co/kOQi55LD5z
Video Transcript AI Summary
The Bush administration accuses President Hussein of deceiving the world about his weapons of mass destruction. A new UN resolution has been proposed, which, if passed, would authorize war due to his failure to prove disarmament. When asked about the new resolution, Speaker 1 maintains their position that they have not pursued any weapons of mass destruction and questions the need for issuing new resolutions. They emphasize that their stance remains unchanged and they prioritize their independence and dignity.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The Bush administration says president Hussein is just trying to fool the world one more time about his missiles and his weapons of mass destruction. And he faces a new UN resolution accusing him of failing to prove he has disarmed. A resolution which, if passed, would in effect Authorize war. Will the new proposed United Nations resolution, the one that's just out this week. Will this make any difference at all in your position?
Speaker 1: The basic position, there is no change. We have not pursued any weapons of mass destruction. So what do they want to issue new resolutions about now?
Speaker 0: So basically, no change in your position?
Speaker 1: The basic stand of our position is clear. We do not compromise our independence. For our dignity
@TrzeciakCraig - Craig Trzeciak
@missin4mati0n That’s because the Putin on the left is who we grew up with. We now have Putin 2.0 https://t.co/yRd8VCe9AI
@SpartaJustice - Truth Justice ™
@TuckerCarlson The truth about Russia and Ukraine. https://t.co/1W7AHktNcb
Video Transcript AI Summary
The video discusses US interference in Ukraine and its implications. It mentions the historical background of Western Ukraine siding with the Nazis during World War 2 and the emergence of extremist groups in Ukraine. It highlights the influence of the CIA, US State Department, and IMF in Ukraine's affairs, including orchestrating a coup against Yanukovych. The video also touches on the war in Ukraine and its impact on globalization. It suggests that the conflict is driven by the desire for control over Ukraine's resources and the deep state's involvement. It concludes by mentioning the need for dialogue and a "great reset" to address global issues.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The first casualty of war is the truth. And if the American people knew the truth about US interference in Ukraine, they might not be so eager to start World War 3. During World War 2, Western Ukraine sided with the Nazis. Operating with them within the Ukraine. After decades of CIA infiltration, the Ukrainian People's Movement emerged in 1989 and gave birth to extremist groups, Svoboda, Trident, and Right Sector, neo Nazi groups pushing for the ethnic cleansing of Ukraine.
Extremist groups cultivated by the CIA, supported by the US state department, and used by the IMF to bring Ukraine to heal. When Yanukovych beat NATO backed, Yushchenko, in the 2010 elections, his government was being pressured into signing an EU association agreement by the International Monetary Fund in their typical conquer by debt offer, that would financially ruin the Ukraine and place them at the mercy of the World Bank. Yanukovych declined their offer. And in today's corrupt world, you're not allowed to say no to the IMF. Funded by Western NGOs associated with George Soros and the CIA, a highly organized color revolution was immediately deployed against Yanukovych.
Leaked phone calls reveal that the US state department was orchestrating this coup d'etat from within the US embassy with support from vice president Joe Biden.
Speaker 1: Sullivan's come back to me, VFR saying you need Biden, and I said probably tomorrow for an Boy, and I get the deets to stick. So Biden's willing.
Speaker 2: So you had this remarkable phone call where you have these 2 senior officials of the US government apparently talking about coup Or how they were planning to restructure the government of Ukraine.
Speaker 1: Fuck the EU. No. Exactly.
Speaker 0: Supporting a criminal war against Russia does not make you a patriot. It makes you a useful idiot of the globalist banking cartel, the very same entities waging war on all of humanity with vaccine passports and experimental jazz. The
Speaker 3: world's biggest investment fund says the war in Ukraine has put an And to globalization as we know it. Larry Fink is the chief executive of BlackRock. Countries and businesses are cutting ties with Russia. They're also imposing sanctions against the country, including cutting off its central bank from its foreign reserves, Fink predicts that with Russia's decoupling from the world, Governments and companies will reevaluate their supply chains and even consider reconsider the dependency in other nations.
Speaker 4: See, the truth is slowly gonna come out about what's really going on. And what's really going on is this. The Ukraine has been the center of Of the globalists for decades decades decades, 70 years at least, CIA, which is not a good organization, They're they're the the implementers of deep state, let's say. They've been working this in the Ukraine for 70 years, building up a resistance to everybody and everything. Why?
Because because they needed to bring the Soviet Union down, but they also want the resources that are in the Ukraine. That's what this is all about. Particularly Eastern Ukraine, massive natural resources The CIA goes in, gets control of an American business interest, and they're not business. They're just robber barons. They're not legitimate businessmen.
They just wanna steal, and that's what goes on. And so they're taking that away from from the from Russia and the Ukraine. And on top of that, it's the center of the deep state. And so by Vlad Putin going in, he's cutting the head off the snake. Once the head comes off, the whole beast will die.
So that's what's actually going on, folks. So please, They are gonna tell you their stories about, possible nuclear war and Vlad's a bad man. This is the war with Russia that they wanted with Hillary Clinton as president because she lost The whole war against Russia was postponed. This is the plan they always had.
Speaker 5: This has been in the works going back to at least 2015, 2016. It was somewhat set back by the election of Donald Trump in the United States because Trump was not a globalist, but he was opposed to many of these schemes. What we're seeing now is a merger of the great reset, the green new deal, The policies on on COVID and a number of other aspects of of government policy, which is being directed not on behalf of sovereign governments, But against sovereign governments. And this is why we're seeing the situation in Ukraine. And what is Russia's crime?
Putin has asked for 20 years for security guarantees for Russia, and these guarantees include No further eastward expansion of NATO, which was promised to Gorbachev in 1990, which was promised again to Yeltsin in 1994, And yet NATO keeps moving to the very borders of Russia. Now they're talking about, as Zelensky, the president of Ukraine, did at the Munich Security Conference, That Ukraine has a right to develop nuclear weapons. And for Putin, Russia's security is directly threatened by 2 aspects u the Ukraine situation, the corruption which includes prominent Nazis in positions of the defense and security forces of Ukraine, The European Union actually acknowledged in 2018 that the defense and security forces of Ukraine were heavily infiltrated by Neo Nazis marching behind the banners of the Ukrainian SS, which joined Hitler in the 19 forties. And when Putin said you need u Vacation of Ukraine, he was called crazy. But the idea of a government, corrupt government being used not To defend the Ukrainian people's freedom and sovereignty.
And I hate to see what's being done to the people of Ukraine right now in this war, But they are the cannon fodder for a NATO and US and British drive to bring down Russia and China. Why? Because they're the 2 leading powers in the world that oppose giving up sovereignty to this Green New Deal and the Great Reset.
Speaker 6: I I don't have too many remedies. The the remedies have to be discussed through dialogue by the stakeholders of our global system, But, I just see the need for such a dialogue, and I see the need for action. I see the need for a great reset.
Speaker 7: To what extent would a reset be brought about by a change in the White House, the election of Joe Biden, for instance?
Speaker 6: I don't know. We first, we shouldn't speculate about the outcome of the election. We will see, beginning of November and Sunday, we we can in any case, we can, and so it's a World Economic Forum, is a very open and as a open platform to integrate everybody who is willing To address those issues in a spirit, which means, to exercise here, true global citizenship.
@MattWallace888 - Matt Wallace
60 Minutes interviews Vladimir Putin! Journalism. Megyn Kelly interviews Vladimir Putin! Journalism. Bloomberg interviews Vladimir Putin! Journalism. Oliver Stone interviews Vladimir Putin! Journalism. Tucker Carlson interviews Vladimir Putin! Treason. https://t.co/iE9scTzyzx
reSee.it AI Summary
The state propaganda media is fearful of Tucker's interview with Putin, as evident in their voices. They are afraid of losing control of the narrative. This is the same media that criticized Tucker for interviewing Putin. These journalists were involved in peddling Russian disinformation and sowing chaos in our elections.
@kylenabecker - Kyle Becker
The state propaganda media is terrified of Tucker's interview with Vladimir Putin. You can hear it in their voices. They are truly afraid of losing control of the narrative. https://t.co/O88aNLijP0
Video Transcript AI Summary
Tucker Carlson, a right-wing media figure, is in Moscow to interview Vladimir Putin. Critics argue that Carlson is not a journalist and instead spreads misinformation on behalf of the Kremlin. They believe his work is biased and not aligned with the facts. Some compare his interview with Putin to watching a scandalous show. Furthermore, there is concern that the Republican Party, including Donald Trump, is doing Putin's bidding. Although some see this as Republicans supporting Putin, others believe they are actually supporting Trump, who in turn supports Putin.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Am I
Speaker 1: allowed to say his name?
Speaker 2: Yes. Yes. I'm just
Speaker 1: His name is Tucker Carlson, and he is the only American journalist who has been able to interview Putin since the invasion in 2022. Tucker Carlson is not a journalist, not even close. He kind of just walks right into Moscow And presents himself on a silver silver platter to the Kremlin, doing the Kremlin's job of misinforming, disinforming the American population.
Speaker 3: His explanation of why he's doing it, that he's a journalist and he needs to inform people, he can call himself whatever he wants. I think, his work is demonstrable as not being just about giving people information. He has a point of view and often it's It's not aligned with the facts.
Speaker 0: Putin talks to an American friend. The Russian president turning to right wing conspiracy theorist Tucker Carlson. And it comes as Kremlin propagandist Tucker Carlson, a leading voice of the right wing disinformation campaign is in Moscow. Ironically, he is there in the name of keeping Americans informed, sitting down for an interview with Vladimir Putin.
Speaker 3: Tucker Carlson is neither a journalist, nor a reporter, but he has played one on TV.
Speaker 4: Tucker Carlson still doesn't have a job. He's in Moscow house hunting, I hope. But, no, actually, Tucker is there to interview Vladimir Putin, which is so overtly ridiculous. Tucker Carlson interviewing Vladimir Putin, may not be, mean much to you, but for Trump, this is like watching OnlyFans. This is insane.
I
Speaker 3: You've seen sharp relief A Republican party that is now doing Vladimir Putin's bidding. Donald Trump always did. Yeah. And somebody that we know, that we used to know, going over, doing Vladimir Putin's bidding.
Speaker 2: It was striking again yesterday To see Republicans across the board, and maybe some of them are doing Vladimir Putin's bidding, but really they're doing Donald Trump's bidding, which is Vladimir Putin's bidding.
@kylenabecker - Kyle Becker
Same vibes: https://t.co/JLAtIUL6vI
@kylenabecker - Kyle Becker
These are the same "journalists" aka "useful idiots" who did Putin's bidding by peddling Russian disinformation in the Clinton Dossier and sowing chaos in our elections https://t.co/B6ZdZ2iCxt
@FreeStateOfMeme - MemeHeardRoundTheWorld
@RealAlexJones The real reason they don't want Tucker interviewing Puťìñ. Putin on ideological differences between Americans and Rusšìans. https://t.co/pH25DSzlB0
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers discuss the ideological differences between the United States and Russia, as well as the historical context of their relationship. They mention the individualistic nature of American society compared to the collectivist nature of Russian society. The conversation touches on the colonization of the American continent and the ethnic cleansing that occurred, as well as the history of slavery in the United States. The speakers highlight the importance of understanding and finding ways to cooperate despite these differences, as there have been periods of unity between the two countries in the past. They emphasize the need to focus on common interests and positive aspects to foster collaboration.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Большое уточнение. Просто мой вопрос был не только американо-иранских отношениях, но и о об американо-иранских отношениях, но и об американо-российских отношениях и наличиях, согласны вы с этим или нет, идеологических фундаментальных противоречий, но ключевым вопросам международного права.
Speaker 1: -Перед встречей с Обамой вы меня прямо так и толкаете.
Speaker 0: О Это же очень важно, потому что если страна считает, что ей позволено больше, чем всем остальным, то Я думал,
Speaker 1: что вы не заметите. Нет, вы заметили, удивительно, какой цепкий боец. У нас идеологических противоречий на сегодняшний день практически нет. У нас есть фундаментальные культурологические. В основе американского самосознания лежит индивидуалистическая идея, в основе российского коллективистская.
Вот есть один из исследователей Пушкина, который об этом очень точно и ясно сказал. Вот Унесенные ветром, помните, там главная героиня, -Она говорит, что я не могу себе представить, что я буду голодать. Вот для нее это самое главное. О нашем представлении, о представлении русского человека. Все-таки другие задачи.
Это что-то такое о за горизонт уходящий, что-то такое душевное, что-то такое связанное с Богом, -Понимаете, это немножко разная философия жизни. И поэтому понять друг друга довольно сложно. Но можно.
Speaker 0: Для этого, наверное, есть международное право для
Speaker 1: того, что я общаюсь. Ну да. Ну вот, о США, безусловно, демократическая страна, и она развивалась изначально как демократическое государство. Ведь когда люди начали осваивать этот континент, они приезжали, выстраивали отношения друг с другом и по факту жизни Вынуждены были это делать в диалоге друг с другом, поэтому она изначально рождалась как фундаментальная демократия. Вместе с не будем забывать, что освоение американского континента Вы меня зовуте, прямо в Гепри, мне не хочется об этом говорить.
Но освоение американского континента началось о крупномасштабной этнической чистке, которая не имела себе равных в истории человечества. Ведь европейцы, когда приехали, они этим и занимались, надо прямо об этом сказать. Она, не знаю, вот человечеству не так много известно из истории, ну, скажем, о уничтожении Карфагена римлянами, да, когда они уходили, они даже землю, так вот легенда гласит, солью посыпали, что там ничего не росло, об освоении американского континента европейцами, там землю никто не посыпал, потому что ее использовали, но уничтожали коренное население. После этого американская история знает рабство, и оно так глубоко проникло, ведь Колин Пауэлл еще в своей книжке написал, как ему было тяжело человеку с темным цветом кожи, тяжело было проиграться, как он всегда чувствовал на себе взгляды окружающих, значит, это сидит. Сидит наверняка до сих пор в душах и сердцах людей.
Ведь, ну, вот смотрите, мы знаем, во всяком случае сегодня, очень многие о стороны советского режима. Знаем Сталина, да? Так, как раньше мы его не знали. Знаем, что это был диктатор, тиран. Я очень сомневаюсь, чтобы Сталин весной 45 года, если бы у него была атомная бомба, -Применил бы ее против Германии.
В 41-42 году, когда стоял вопрос о жизни или смерти государства, Может быть, применил, если бы у него было. А в 45-м, когда уже противник все, Сдавался, по сути дела, шансов у него никаких не было. Я сомневаюсь, вот я лично. А американцы применили против Японии, терпящие поражения, причем против неядерного государства? Знаете, вот у нас большие различия между нами, но это ведь
Speaker 0: о -Нормально, когда люди с такими большими
Speaker 1: различиями полны решимости искать пути, которые помогают понимать друг друга. И мне представляется, что у нас нет другого выбора. И, более того, Ведь не случайно, что в критические периоды современной, новейшей истории о России и Соединенные Штаты объединялись и в Первую мировую войну, и во Вторую мировую войну. Вот как бы, как бы не противостояли друг другу, а когда вот гром грянул, произошло объединение. Что-то все-таки объединяет, о какие то обще фундаментальные интересы объединяют, нам нужно нам нужно вот на это обращать внимание, прежде всего.
Знать наши различия, но при этом все-таки обращать внимание на тот позитив, который поможет нам сотрудничать.
@pavyg - Pavvy G
@TuckerCarlson A reminder of what the west used to think of Vladimir Putin before they got worried that he would become a threat to their globalist plans. https://t.co/fAWuVA5M1X
Video Transcript AI Summary
Two speakers, one being former President George W. Bush, express trust in Vladimir Putin, praising his straightforwardness and trustworthiness. Another speaker, possibly Joe Biden, acknowledges Putin's intelligence and their good relationship, stating that Putin kept his word in personal agreements. Another speaker highlights the challenges Putin faces as the President of Russia, including the need for economic restructuring, rebuilding civic society, and overcoming historical legacies in external relations. The transcript ends with a statement expressing confidence in a new level of cooperation between NATO members and Russia.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Is this a man that Americans can trust? I looked the man in the eye. I found it to be very straightforward and trustworthy. We had a very good dialogue. I was able to, get a sense of his soul.
I wouldn't have invited him to my ranch if I didn't trust him.
Speaker 1: Well, here's Biden 20 years ago praising Vladimir Putin for moving toward democracy.
Speaker 2: I'm close to amazed by how far Putin seems to have come in making throwing his lot with the west. I don't think anybody since Peter the Great has made such a significant, at least Initial move to the west.
Speaker 3: Mister Putin is got he got all he's very smart. You know him better than most people. Yeah. I do. We had a really good blunt relationship.
If you didn't ever renege on a personal agreement he made to you? He did not. So behind closed doors, he could be trusted? He kept his word and all the deals we made.
Speaker 1: We have to understand the scale of the problems that the president of Russia has to deal with, and Unlike any of the problems that any of the rest of us in in the Western world have to deal with. I mean, he's dealing with an economy that needs absolutely fundamental Restructuring, civic society that needs to be rebuilt after the years of of of communism, and external relations that have a whole series Historical legacies that have to be overcome. So I don't think it's surprising that he is and presents himself as A strong leader is a patriotic leader for Russia.
Speaker 0: I am confident that this new level of cooperation between NATO's members and Russia will now change
@PUNlSHEDJesus - 🏍✝JESUS MOTORCYCLE✝🏍
Putin sings Blueberry Hill while Hollywood celebrities applaud and sing along. America wishes they had a leader as loved and respected as this guy. https://t.co/PSsm6oiOxD
@mistergusano - Gusano
For those Putin followers who think that the Great Putin is fighting against the Talmudic Bolshevik, and the Babylonian Communists, I’m sorry to disappoint you… https://t.co/Q5qdGCNoP4
@BGatesIsaPyscho - Concerned Citizen
Hard to disagree with Russia on this one? https://t.co/L8Bkz4vwrR
@TaraInExile - Tara In Exile
Living in Russia's really opened my eyes. Don’t buy into all the mainstream media propaganda—there's a lot more to the story than what they tell you. https://t.co/onXJCDLzhR
Video Transcript AI Summary
Living in Russia is a wonderful experience, and the reality differs greatly from American propaganda. Russians welcome Americans. Transportation is accessible, easy, clean, and efficient, with low crime. Food is clean, GMO- and pesticide-free, and costs a third of what it does in America.
Medical care is accessible and affordable, as is education, which sets up a healthy, thriving middle class. 80 to 85% of people in Moscow own their flats or dachas. The speaker visited Saint Petersburg, Vladivostok, and Moscow, and saw a lot of farming in the countryside. Young entrepreneurs at the Saint Petersburg Economic Forum said it is easy to start a business in Russia due to less red tape and reasonable taxes.
These factors allow Russians to thrive, making them happy with their leadership and country, fostering innovation and trade with countries like China, India, and South Africa. The speaker encourages people to think critically, get a tourist visa, and see Russia for themselves.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Many of you have reached out and asked me what it's like to live in Russia. It has been a really wonderful experience. And one thing I really wanted to relay to all of you is how many lies and propaganda we've been told about Russia in America. It is amazing how different it is from what we're being told here in America. Russians, first of all, are very welcoming of Americans and really like them to be there.
I was welcomed with open arms even though I didn't know the language and didn't really know the culture. Also, transportation is accessible, easy, clean, efficient, and there's low crime. Food is clean. There's no GMOs. There's no pesticides, and it's a third of what it costs in America.
There's accessible medical care, which I had to use while I was there, and it was very affordable, as well as education. Now I talked to other Russians who went through the education system there, and it's really a great system, and they can go all the way through university. This sets up a healthy, thriving, middle class, and working university. This sets up a healthy, thriving, middle class, and working class, and that's what you see when you go to Russia. 80 to 85%, for instance, in Moscow of people own their own flats or and or dashes, which are the little houses outside in the country.
I went to Saint Petersburg, Vladivostok, and Moscow. So I got to see a lot of different cities and also in the countryside as well. There's a lot of farming and agricultural starting up. I went to the Saint Petersburg Economic Forum and I met some young entrepreneurs. And they talked about how easy it is right now to start a business in Russia, to cut through the red tape, and the taxes aren't prohibitive.
All of these things are making Russians thrive as a people. And so that's why they're happy with their leadership and happy with their country. And it makes for a lot of innovation and a lot of trade that they're able to do with other neighboring countries like China and India and South Africa. So that said, what I wanna relay to all of you is, you know, find out for yourself. Think critically.
If you don't believe me, get a tourist visa and go to Russia. See for yourself.
@adnashmyash - Maksym Borodin
@kingsrush "Russia is not an enemy..." https://t.co/pUNAcPRNuG
Video Transcript AI Summary
За Белгород, Донбасс и Крокос! Для победы России необходимо ввести полярные задания в стратегические ядерные ракеты и нацелить их на города США! Ярс, Сармат и Посейдон — готовим к запуску! Вашингтон, мы идем за тобой!
---
For Belgorod, Donbass, and Krokos! To achieve victory for Russia, we need to implement polar missions in our strategic nuclear missiles and target them at U.S. cities! Yars, Sarmat, and Poseidon — preparing for launch! Washington, we are coming for you!
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: За Белгород, Донбасс и Крокос берем
Speaker 1: США в фокус!
Speaker 0: Для Победы России требуем ввести полярные задания в наши стратегические ядерные ракеты и наставить их на города Соединенных Штатов Америки! Ярс, Сармат и Посейдон! Берем прицепы! Вашингтон!
Speaker 1: На, Вашингтон! На, Вашингтон! На, Вашингтон! На, Вашингтон! На, Вашингтон!
На, Вашингтон! На, Вашингтон! На, Вашингтон! На, Вашингтон! На Вашингтон!
На Вашингтон! На Вашингтон! На Вашингтон! На Вашингтон! На Вашингтон!
На Вашингтон! На Вашингтон! На Вашингтон! На Вашингтон! На
@DefiantLs - Defiant L’s
In case you needed a reminder of how the media operates. https://t.co/Cy4wfTrapI
Video Transcript AI Summary
CNN allegedly edited a video to falsely depict Trump dumping fish food in Japan, when he was following the prime minister's lead. NBC News falsely reported Putin claimed to have compromising information on Trump; Putin actually denied it.
The New York Times and CNN allegedly shared photos of immigrant children in cages from 2014, during the Obama administration. Newsweek falsely reported Trump golfed in Florida during Thanksgiving 2019; he was serving troops in Afghanistan.
CBS allegedly aired a story in March 2020 showing a crowded New York hospital, using file footage from Italy, and repeated the error a week later. The BBC and The Guardian reported Trump didn't listen to an Italian prime minister's speech because he wasn't wearing headsets, but he was wearing an earpiece. Newsweek reported Poland's first lady refused to shake Trump's hand, but later acknowledged she did.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: CNN edited the video to make it appear as though Trump impatiently dumped a box of fish food into the water in Japan. The full video showed Trump had simply followed the lead of Japan's prime minister. In June 2017, NBC News reported that Russian president Putin said he had compromising information about Trump. Actually, Putin said the opposite. Do you have something damaging on our president?
Well, this is just another load of nonsense. Where would we get this information? The New York Times and CNN shared a story with photos of immigrant children in cages. It turns out the photos were from 2014 during the Obama administration. In November 2019, Newsweek falsely reported that president Trump was spending Thanksgiving golfing in Florida.
He was actually in Afghanistan serving dinner to US troops. Good morning. CBS aired a story in March of 2020 supposedly showing a New York hospital crowded with patients It's all hands on deck in America's hospitals. It was actually filed tape from Italy. A week later, CBS News mistakenly used the Italy video again.
In May, the BBC and The Guardian reported because Trump wasn't wearing headsets, he didn't bother to listen to the translation of a speech by Italy's prime minister. But Trump was wearing his ear piece in his right ear as always at the White House. Newsweek reported Poland's first lady refused to shake Trump's hand, but later acknowledged she did.
@Linda82982011 - Ms. Jazz
@_wake_up_USA They had state run media since Operation Mockingbird. Then Elon bought Twitter and we can finally hear the truth. https://t.co/7NkOdU73Dh
@ricwe123 - Richard
There was a time when German mainstream media bothered telling the public that the Ukrainian government was terrorizing the people living in Donbas and Luhansk. That era is long gone, buried beneath a mountain of lies and propaganda..... https://t.co/Hy8UcQrkcb
Video Transcript AI Summary
Georg Restle of Westdeutscher Rundfunk offers a commentary on the European Union’s responsibility amid violence in eastern Ukraine. He foregrounds the gravity of the conflict by citing UN figures: over 1,000 dead, about 3,500 injured, and around 100,000 displaced. The situation is described as war in Europe, one of the dirtiest the continent has seen in decades. People in Donetsk and Luhansk are experiencing conditions reminiscent of past wars: no electricity or water, scarce bread, and daily fear of being buried under the rubble of their homes. The demand is clear: the war must end, but not through vague pleas or one-sided appeals.
Restle argues that Western leaders who rightly call on Vladimir Putin to stop Russia’s backing of pro-Russian militias must also support the Ukrainian government. He emphasizes that the UN report is unambiguous: the Ukrainian military also terrorizes civilians, using artillery fire in residential settings and showing little regard for the distress and lives of ordinary people. This, he states, is unacceptable and cannot be tolerated by Europe.
He further asserts that Moscow is complicit in a broader cycle of violence, as it bears responsibility for a “soldateska” that abducts, tortures, and murders innocents. In light of this, Europe’s governments also bear responsibility for the actions of the Kyiv government that they helped bring to power. Restle insists that a clear message must now be directed at those in Kyiv: the terror against civilians must end, and artillery shelling of living areas must stop immediately.
If such demands are not met, Restle warns that Europe would become complicit in the killings. The conclusion draws a stark moral equation: the dead civilians in the house-to-house fighting in Donetsk or Luhansk would also be Europe’s dead, if European policy remains passive or one-sided. The transcript centers on a call for accountability and balanced pressure—holding all parties to ceasefire commitments and civilian-targeted violence, while recognizing the shared responsibility Europeans would bear if the fighting continues without decisive action.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Welche Verantwortung trägt die Europäische Union angesichts der Gewalt im Osten der Ukraine? Dazu ein Kommentar von Georg Restle vom Westdeutschen Rundfunk.
Speaker 1: Über 1000 Tote, dreieinhalbtausend Verletzte, 100000 auf der Flucht. Wer die Zahlen der Vereinten Nationen von heute ernst nimmt, der sollte aufhören, in der Ukraine von einem Konflikt oder Aufstand zu sprechen. Nein, dies ist Krieg mitten in Europa. Und es ist 1 der schmutzigsten, den dieser Kontinent in den letzten Jahrzehnten gesehen hat. Was die Menschen in Donezk oder Luhansk in diesen Tagen erleben, ist ein Albtraum, den die meisten von uns nur noch von den Erzählungen ihrer Eltern oder Großeltern kennen.
Kein Strom und kein Wasser, kaum noch Brot zum Essen und die tägliche Angst, schon morgen von den Trümmern des eigenen Hauses begraben zu werden. Ja, dieser Krieg muss aufhören. Aber mit wohlfeilen Appellen ist es längst nicht mehr getan, schon gar nicht mit einseitigen. Wenn westliche Politiker Wladimir Putin zu Recht auffordern, Russlands Unterstützung für die prorussischen Terrormilizen zu beenden, dann, ja dann müssen sie jetzt auch der ukrainischen Regierung in den Arm fallen. Denn der Bericht der UN ist unmissverständlich.
Auch das ukrainische Militär terrorisiert die Zivilbevölkerung. Es trägt den Krieg mit Artilleriefeuer in Wohn- und Schlafzimmer. Es nimmt kaum Rücksicht auf die Not der Menschen und auf deren Leben offenbar noch weniger. Dies kann, dies darf Europa nicht dulden. So wie Moskau mitverantwortlich ist für eine Soldateska, die Unschuldige entführt, foltert und mordet, so tragen Europas Regierungen Mitverantwortung für das rücksichtslose Töten 1 Regierung, der sie selbst zur Macht verholfen haben.
Deshalb braucht es jetzt eine klare Botschaft an die Machthaber in Kiew. Der Terror gegen die Zivilbevölkerung muss beendet, der Artilleriebeschuss von Wohngebieten sofort eingestellt werden. Wenn nicht, macht sich Europa mitschuldig. Dann sind die getöteten Zivilisten im Häuserkampf von Donezk oder Luchansk auch unsere Toten.