TruthArchive.ai - Related Post Feed

Saved - February 24, 2024 at 1:29 AM

@blysx - Antony Blinken’s Bar mitzvah 🇷🇺🇵🇸

@_whitneywebb Not to mention that all the armaments used in these murders are bought and paid for by the U.S. taxpayer... https://t.co/c79SPPA35R

Saved - February 1, 2024 at 7:59 PM

@TheErrantFriend - The Errant Friend

Remember the words of Julian Assange whenever you see news reports of rockets fired, bases hit by attacks, or middle east violence. The goal is never to win. The goal is to have endless wars to wash money out of taxpayer pockets and into the hands of a transnational elite cabal. https://t.co/uJ8xF1woE9

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker explains that the objective is not to conquer Afghanistan, but rather to use it as a means to launder money from the United States and European countries back to a global network. The intention is to perpetuate an ongoing war, rather than achieving a victorious outcome.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Because the goal is not to completely subjugate Afghanistan. The goal is to use Afghanistan to wash money out of the tax basis of the United States, out of the tax basis of European countries through Afghanistan and back into the hands of a Transnational the world. That is the goal. I e, the goal is to have an endless war, not a successful war.
Saved - September 6, 2025 at 6:21 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe that the general population opposes wars, often being misled into conflict by the military-industrial complex and corrupt media. The ongoing support for Ukraine, which has cost taxpayers billions, highlights this issue. I see a pattern where wars are based on lies, leading to devastating consequences, yet the same political figures remain unaccountable. The push for military spending continues, while calls for peace are ignored. It's frustrating to witness politicians prioritize war over the needs of their own citizens.

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

Population as a whole don’t like wars. They don’t want to go into wars. They have to be fooled to reluctantly go into wars based on lies and misinformation. #MilitaryIndustrialComplex combined with corrupt #media push nations into wars. A 🧵👇 https://t.co/KMNiCiekO8

Video Transcript AI Summary
"One of the hopeful things that I have discovered is that nearly every war that has started in the past fifty years has been a result of media lives." "The media could have stopped it if they had searched deep enough." "If they hadn't reprinted government propaganda they could have stopped it." "Populations don't like wars and populations have to be fooled into wars." "Populations don't willingly and with open eyes go into a war." "But our number one enemy is ignorance and I believe that is the number one enemy that everyone is not understanding what is actually going on in the world." "Now, the question is who is promoting ignorance?" "In this latter category, it is bad media." "The result is we see wars and we see corrupt governance continue."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: One of the hopeful things that I have discovered is that nearly every war that has started in the past fifty years has been a result of media lives. The media could have stopped it if they had searched deep enough. If they hadn't reprinted government propaganda they could have stopped it. But what does that mean? Well that means basically populations don't like wars and populations have to be fooled into wars. Populations don't willingly and with open eyes go into a war. So if we have a good media environment then we will also have a peaceful environment. But our number one enemy is ignorance and I believe that is the number one enemy that everyone is not understanding what is actually going on in the world. It's only when you start to understand that you can make effective decisions and effective plans. Now, the question is who is promoting ignorance? Well, organisations that try to keep them secret, and those organisations which distort true information to make them false, misrepresented. In this latter category, it is bad media. It really is my opinion that the media in general are so bad, we have to question whether the world wouldn't be better off without them altogether. There's some very, very fine journalists and we work with many of them and some fine media organizations, but the vast majority are awful and are so distorted to how the world actually is. The result is we see wars and we see corrupt governance continue.

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

A prev thread on wars

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

America and NATO allies have supported Ukraine in this proxy war with Russia to the tune of $200 billion and it keeps growing. The sad part was Ukraine democratically elected government was brought down by the NATO forces in 2014. A meme 🧵 on wars 👇 https://t.co/GyvFHmZRmm

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

Just looking at this ridiculous amount of money #MilitaryIndustrialComplex is wasting on Ukraine makes my blood boil with hate for our politicians and bureaucrats pushing for these regime changes and wars

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

Each dot represents $100,000 in US taxpayer dollars, according to this highly illustrative graphic cc: @wgeary This is funding a NATO proxy war to further #MilitaryIndustrialComplex If put to vote 90% of Americans would oppose to fund Ukraine war https://t.co/sD3hr89uQ8

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

AS LONG AS JULIAN ASSANGE IS IN PRISON, WE ARE ALL IN PRISON. WHEN THE GOVERNMENT HAS THE POWER TO TELL US WHAT WE ARE ALLOWED TO SEE, HEAR AND KNOW, WE NO LONGER LIVE IN A FREE SOCIETY #FreeAssange #FreeAssangeNOW https://t.co/lmQDwfpQqb

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

https://t.co/frq2LiqRkD

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

Your government is least interested in stopping to lie, instead they’re terribly upset at those who expose their lies. https://t.co/Mt7FD1Nkmi

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

The #MilitaryIndustrialComplex doesn’t want peace, they’re war mongers EU wants war NATO wants war America wants war You’ll never have peace if one side never wants peace. Simple.

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

Brazil's President says the EU only wants war, weapons, and NATO expansion, while BRICS nations want a peaceful resolution: "How can we achieve peace between Russia and Ukraine if no one is talking about peace? Everyone is talking about war, talking about providing weapons to assist Ukraine, or NATO expansion eastward to Russia's border. Therefore, we must find those countries that seek peace. China wants peace. Brazil wants peace. Indonesia wants peace. India wants peace. So, let's bring these countries together and make a peace proposal for Ukraine. I used to trust the EU because it has always played an important role as a balancing force and has never directly participated in wars. However, the EU is directly involved in this conflict. When German Chancellor Olaf Scholz visited Brazil, and asked Brazil to sell missiles to the EU to help Ukraine, I told him 'no' because Brazil does not want to be involved in the war and hopes for peace."

Video Transcript AI Summary
Como é que a gente vai conseguir paz na Rússia e na Ucrânia? Se ninguém está falando em paz, todo mundo só fala de guerra, de mais armas para a Ucrânia ou de atacar a Rússia. O que precisamos, então, é de países que queiram paz. A China quer paz, o Brasil quer paz, a Indonésia quer paz, a Índia quer paz. Temos que juntar esses países e fazer uma única proposta de paz para Rússia e Ucrânia. Estou convencido de que a União Europeia, que sempre foi ponto de equilíbrio e nunca participava diretamente dos conflitos, agora entrou diretamente no conflito. Quando Olavo Schutz, chanceler da Alemanha, foi ao Brasil pedir para vender mísseis para entregar à Ucrânia, eu disse que não ia vender, porque o Brasil não quer entrar na guerra. O Brasil quer paz. English translation: How are we going to achieve peace in Russia and Ukraine? If no one is talking about peace, everyone is talking about war, about more weapons for Ukraine or attacking Russia. What we need, then, are countries that want peace. China wants peace, Brazil wants peace, Indonesia wants peace, India wants peace. We have to bring these countries together and make a single peace proposal for Russia and Ukraine. I am convinced that the European Union, which has always been a balancing force and never directly participated in conflicts, now has entered the conflict directly. When comrade Olavo Schutz, the German chancellor, went to Brazil to ask to sell missiles to deliver to Ukraine, I said I would not sell, because Brazil does not want to enter the war. Brazil wants peace.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Como é que a gente vai conseguir paz na Rússia e na Ucrânia? Se ninguém está falando em paz, todo mundo só está falando em guerra, todo mundo só está falando da da mais armas para a Ucrânia, sabe, atacar a Rússia ou a OTAN colocar fronteira no território russo. Então o que que nós precisamos encontrar? Países que queiram paz. A China quer paz, o Brasil quer paz, a Indonésia quer paz, a Índia quer paz. Então nós temos que juntar esses países e fazer 1 proposta de paz para a Rússia e para a Ucrânia. Eu eu tenho, estou convencido que a União Europeia, que sempre jogou papel importante porque a União Europeia sempre foi ponto de equilíbrio, né? Ela nunca participava diretamente dos conflitos, ela agora entrou diretamente no conflito. Quando o companheiro Olavo Schutz, chanceler da Alemanha, foi ao Brasil pedir para que o Brasil vendesse, sabe, mísseis para que ele pudesse entregar para a Ucrânia, eu disse que não ia vender os mísseis, porque o Brasil não quer entrar na guerra. O Brasil quer paz.

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

PRAGUE - Tens of thousands of people are protesting against the government, for spending too much money and energy on Ukraine and ignoring the needs of their own people. Inflation now at 15% the people call for the globalist government to resign. #MilitaryIndustrialComplex doesn’t want the wars to end, it wants an endless war.

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

Independent Texas needs American democracy then… right? https://t.co/dcwiwajd2K

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

https://t.co/BxFEfVQbre

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

As if America doesn’t threaten other countries already with endless wars and sanctions, this lunatic CEO is asking for more with AI for his personal gains… what could go wrong https://t.co/Ccc96Y7agU

@brandongorrell - bsg

"We need to spend at least 5% of our budget on capabilities that will terrify our adversaries" — Palantir CTO @ssankar on how the DoD should leverage AI in the Senate Committee hearing on AI this morning.🤘🤘🤘 https://t.co/7cqRa4eK7Q

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

10 wars, millions dead, 1 Nobel peace prize and 0 indictments, 0 ICC hearings https://t.co/rOgvoNALZF

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

Can you believe it… https://t.co/LgmSidrgzL

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

What’s the weekly consignment to Ukraine these days $10 billion? https://t.co/MfNz1Mm6j3

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

All wars are based on lies. Wars are old men lying, young men dying. Stop enlisting and dying for their lies. https://t.co/oUlf9bTnVi

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

https://t.co/fhhQDxMbc1

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

The Ukraine war and the Iraq war are the same thing. They both wanted regime change, except Putin is considered a war criminal, Bush not https://t.co/gvGVh9TYkK

Video Transcript AI Summary
"Please explain to me the difference between Putin's invasion of Ukraine and our invasion of Iraq." "Somebody tell me what was different." "Why was ours considered okay and Russia's not?" "The only they're for the same thing, regime change." "Same thing." "We wanna change who is governing Iraq." "Putin wanted to change who is governing Ukraine." "Now don't get me wrong." "I didn't support either war." "They both suck." "But everybody you notice our national media doesn't bring that up at all, do they?" "And you notice they brought up now the Fed or the international courts have made it so Putin can't travel now because he's considered a war criminal." "Let's not forget the international courts did the same thing with Bush and Cheney after the invasion of Iraq." "Why do you think George Bush can't leave The US?"
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You don't like the questions I ask, so I'll ask you one today. Please explain to me the difference between Putin's invasion of Ukraine and our invasion of Iraq. Somebody tell me what was different. Why was ours considered okay and Russia's not? The only they're for the same thing, regime change. Same thing. We wanna change who is governing Iraq. Putin wanted to change who is governing Ukraine. Now don't get me wrong. I didn't support either war. They both suck. But everybody you notice our national media doesn't bring that up at all, do they? And you notice they brought up now the Fed or the international courts have made it so Putin can't travel now because he's considered a war criminal. Let's not forget the international courts did the same thing with Bush and Cheney after the invasion of Iraq. Why do you think George Bush can't leave The US?

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

Of course Victoria Nuland from America discussed democracy with Sudan 🇸🇩… no wonder it’s doing great https://t.co/P8syVnnh22

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

Highest military spending since the end of cold war. Ukraine is pushing us slowly towards WW3 unless some sanity prevails and negotiations happen between NATO & Russia. https://t.co/YvgHxItoGF

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

Truth about what’s going on in Sudan 🇸🇩. Russia wants to establish a naval base on the coast of Sudan in the Red Sea and America is opposing this deal. Stop your proxy wars in Africa now and get out America and Russia. https://t.co/daPS65uwuM

Video Transcript AI Summary
America and Russia are at it again, as in the Cold War they fought proxy wars in Africa, leading to the death of thousands of Africans. They are at it again in Sudan, fighting a proxy war. Two factions of the Sudanese military are fighting: one led by lieutenant general Mohammed Hamdan, head of the Rapid Support Forces; the other by army chief Abdel Fattah al Burhan. Russia has finalized a deal with Sudan to establish Russia's naval base in Sudan's Red Sea coast, and America is furious; 'America's ambassador to Sudan, John Godfrey, expressly wants Sudan not to seal that deal with Russia.' The fighting wasn't happening in a vacuum. Africa must learn to speak its truth; truth will set you free. The Cold War days are over; they cannot fight proxy wars in Africa at the expense of African lives. The fighting in Sudan must stop.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What's happening there is more than meets the eye, and it's time for the world to discuss the actual truth of what is going on there. America and Russia are at it again, just as they did sixty years ago during the Cold War when they fought proxy wars right in Africa, leading to the death of thousands of innocent Africans. They are at it again in Sudan, fighting a proxy war. Let me explain. Two factions of the Sudanese military are fighting each other. One of them is led by lieutenant general Mohammed Hamdan, head of the paramilitary group known as Rapid Support Forces. The other faction is led by the Sudanese army chief, general Abdel Fattah al Burhan. So why are they fighting? This is where Russia and USA come into the picture. You see, in the last couple of months, Russia has finalized a deal with Sudan to establish Russia's naval base in Sudan's Red Sea coast. America is not too happy with that. Actually, they're furious. America's ambassador to Sudan, John Godfrey, expressly wants Sudan not to seal that deal with Russia, but they're going ahead and doing just that. And so when the paramilitary unit began fighting the other faction of the army, that wasn't happening in a vacuum. The big problem is that you're not going to hear this in the mainstream media, neither are you going to hear a lot of African governments voicing this, which is very unfortunate because Africa must learn to speak its truth and stand on this truth because truth will set you free. So it is left to the African people, we, the African people, to speak this truth and tell America and Russia to get off Africa, to get their hands off Africa. The days of the Cold War, the days of the shenanigans of the Cold War are completely over, and they cannot fight proxy wars in Africa at the expense of innocent African lives. That has to stop. The fighting in Sudan must stop. The puppet masters must stop their evil, diabolic games.

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

US military spending trumps other major powers combined by a mile. Cut military spending, close the bases and recall troops as RFK suggests. https://t.co/QMiNZ1CKDJ

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

Every military conflict was a lie. Iraq was a lie and it destabilized the Middle East and spilled refugees into Syria etc. Afghanistan was a lie and the country literally fell back into the hands of Taliban. Ukraine Wasa lie and they keep lying.

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

.@DavidSacks explains how his distrust of the U.S. foreign policy establishment grew from the numerous lies, $8 trillion spent, and millions killed in Middle Eastern wars over the last two decades: "They lied us into the Iraq War. The war did nothing to improve American security. We destabilized the Middle East. We turned Iraq into an Iranian proxy state. The destabilization created a huge refugee problem that spilled over into Syria, which is another intervention that we bungled. We got in Afghanistan initially motivated by the fact that they supported Al Qaeda, which attacked us on 9/11, but then we stayed there in an open-ended occupation for 20 years, and the entire time we were told that we were winning and the country was being transformed into a democracy and everything turned out to be a lie. All of these foreign interventions in the middle east cost us $8 trillion, and the number of deaths is staggering. Almost a million direct deaths from all the wars we launched, and I've seen excess mortality numbers as high as 5 million. We unleashed staggering death and destruction. So, I don't know how you can live through the past twenty years without rethinking American foreign policy. Not recognizing that American foreign policy has been overly activist and overly interventionist. It's totally backfired on us and blown up in our faces. The sad thing is the same people that got us involved in that foreign policy are still there. It's the foreign policy establishment. There's been very little accountability for all of those people. In fact, most of them have moved to the Democratic party. They are really comfortable with the idea of state power."

Video Transcript AI Summary
I've evolved by watching what's been going on. I supported it because I thought they were telling us the truth. It was all lies. They lied us into that war. The war did nothing to improve American security. We destabilized the Middle East. We turned Iraq into an Iranian proxy state. We created a huge, again, destabilization, which created a huge, refugee problem that spilled over into Syria. We got involved in Afghanistan. We were told that we were winning, and the country was being transformed into a, you know, democracy. And everything turned out to be just a lie. Cost us around $8,000,000,000,000, and almost a million direct deaths, with excess mortality numbers as high as five million. The foreign policy establishment, the blob.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So this this is one of those issues where I've just evolved by, like, watching what's been going on. I mean, like everybody else, when we got involved in the Iraq war, I supported it because I thought they were telling us the truth. I mean, they told us that the Bush administration did, that Saddam Hussein was in cahoots with Al Qaeda, and they had WMD programs. And in fact, we knew where those programs were. That's literally what the administration told us. It was all lies. They lied us into that war. The war did nothing to improve American security. We destabilized the Middle East. We turned Iraq into an Iranian proxy state. We, we created a huge, again, destabilization, which created a huge, refugee problem that spilled over into Syria, which is another Yeah. Intervention that we we bungled. We got involved in Afghanistan. I think the original motivation for going into Afghanistan was just because they actually did support Al Qaeda and, which, attacked us in 09/11. But then we stayed there in an open end occupation for twenty years. And the entire time, we were told that we were winning, and the country was being transformed into a, you know, democracy. And everything turned out to be just a lie. So and then, of course, you know, I could get to the the just the actual numbers around this. It cost us all these foreign interventions in The Middle East cost us something like $8,000,000,000,000, and the number of deaths is just staggering. So, you know, almost a million direct deaths from from all the wars that we we launched, and I've seen excess mortality numbers as high as five million. So, you know, we unleashed staggering death and destruction. And, so I don't know how you lived through that over the past twenty years and not rethink American foreign policy. You know? Not recognize that that that American foreign policy has been overly activist and overly interventionist, and has totally blown up and backfired on us and blown up in our faces. And the sad thing is the same people who got us involved in that foreign policy, they're still there. I mean, it's it's the foreign policy establishment, the blob. There's been very little accountability for all those people. In fact, most of them have moved to the Democratic party. They're very comfortable with the idea of state power. So, you know, but there was a small circle of of, in in in the form in foreign policy who accurately predicted what would happen, and that that's basically the realist camp. And, of course, they're very out of favor with, with the elites in Washington because they, they wanted to restrain American involvement. And and that's not a popular message for anyone in Washington here. Yeah. So, yeah, I mean, I've I guess I've become more realist over time by virtue of just seeing the results of our policies.

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

Victoria Nuland the undersecretary of state a Bush era neocon - instead of promoting diplomacy, she lights matches wherever she meddles, agitating for endless wars in Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria and now in Ukraine. @codepink petition for awareness https://www.codepink.org/bidenfirenuland https://t.co/mb2wvCFL11

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

@sahouraxo is right - wherever Victoria Nuland goes, death and destruction follows https://t.co/qoBhOMaZMn

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

Military spending, 2022. China🇨🇳: $291 billion India🇮🇳: $66 billion Russia🇷🇺: $61 billion UK🇬🇧: $55 billion France🇫🇷: $51 billion Japan🇯🇵: $48 billion Germany🇩🇪: $46 billion Italy🇮🇹: $33 billion Brazil🇧🇷: $20 billion Iran🇮🇷: $6 billion Total: $677 billion US🇺🇸 military spending, 2022: $877 billion Yet in Western media, it’s China and Russia that seek world domination and are the biggest threat to world peace, not the United States.

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

Who cares if other people in other countries die… we are safe… right? https://t.co/KJ4E8IOarU

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

Is WHO declaring an emergency now https://t.co/36XX4mVE29

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

Hey American politicians and #DeepState Here’s an idea - stop wasting trillions of dollars on unnecessary wars & regime changes, take care of your own people, cities, borders, crimes and drug addiction issues https://t.co/IPy16Qoimk

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

Both Republicans & Democrats are part of #MilitaryIndustrialComplex https://t.co/HML8c6HaJK

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

No wonder USA and NATO nations don’t want an independent investigation on #Nordstream pipelines https://t.co/IznKfKpQAA

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

The War Department posted a reward for the capture of John Wilkes Booth, John Surrat, and David Harold, who murdered president Abraham Lincoln, April 20, 1865. https://t.co/8Ti3ha2Et9

Saved - August 15, 2023 at 1:32 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
President Eisenhower's farewell address warned us about the rise of the Military Industrial Complex, which has resulted in endless wars and misery. He also cautioned against a scientific and technological elite driving public policy, exemplified by the Covid Cartel censoring truth and sabotaging early treatment. Moreover, he emphasized the importance of not plundering our children's future, yet we face a staggering $162 trillion deficit and $33 trillion in total debt. Lastly, he urged us to avoid falling into a state of fear and hate, but scientific and political elites perpetuate alarmism and division. Watch the full video for more details.

@SenRonJohnson - Senator Ron Johnson

Take time to listen to President Eisenhower’s 15-minute-long farewell address. Here are 4 clips of what he warned us about that have all come true. Amazingly prescient.

@SenRonJohnson - Senator Ron Johnson

WARNING: The grave implications of the rise of the Military Industrial Complex. RESULT: Endless wars and misery. https://t.co/NH5w103jiP

Video Transcript AI Summary
Threats constantly arise, and our military must be ready to deter aggression. Our military establishment has changed significantly since World War II and Korea. We now have a permanent armaments industry and 3.5 million people working in defense. The economic, political, and spiritual influence of this military-industrial complex is felt everywhere. While we recognize its importance, we must also understand its implications. We must guard against unwarranted influence by the military-industrial complex and ensure it doesn't endanger our liberties or democratic processes. We cannot take anything for granted. Only an alert and knowledgeable citizenry can ensure that our industrial and military machinery aligns with our peaceful goals for security and liberty to thrive.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But threats new in kind or degree constantly arise. Of these, I mentioned too only. A vital element in keeping the peace is our military establishment. Our arms must be mighty, ready for instant action so that no potential aggressor may be tempted to risk his own destruction. Our military organization today bears little relation to that known of any of my predecessors in peacetime or indeed by the fighting men of World War II or Korea. Until the latest of our world conflicts, the United States had no armaments industry. American makers of plowshares could, with time and as required, make swords as well, but we can no longer risk emergency improvisation of national defense. We have been compelled to create a permanent armaments industry of vast proportion. Added to this, 3,500,000 men and women are directly engaged in the defense establishment. We annually spend on military security alone more than the net income of all United States corporation corporations. Now this conjunction of an immense military establishment and a large arms industry is new in the American experience. The total influence, Economic, political, even spiritual is felt in every city, every state house, every office of the federal government. We recognize the imperative need for this development, yet we must not fail to comprehend its grave implications. Our toil, Resources and livelihood are all involved. So is the very structure of our society. In the councils of government, We must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence whether sought or unsought by the military industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist. We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes. We should take nothing for granted. Only an alert and knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial and military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods and goals so that security and liberty may prosper together.

@SenRonJohnson - Senator Ron Johnson

WARNING: The dangers of a scientific and technological elite driving public policy. RESULT: The Covid Cartel censoring truth and sabotaging early treatment. https://t.co/mBRLnwp0Mj

Video Transcript AI Summary
The technological revolution has brought significant changes to our industrial and military landscape. Research has become more formalized, complex, and expensive, with a growing portion being funded by the government. The traditional image of a solitary inventor has been replaced by teams of scientists in labs and testing fields. Similarly, universities have also undergone a research revolution, with government contracts often replacing intellectual curiosity due to the high costs involved. While we should respect and value scientific research, we must also be cautious of the potential for public policy to be influenced by a scientific elite. It is the responsibility of statesmanship to balance and integrate these forces within our democratic system, always striving for the goals of our free society.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Akin to and largely responsible for the sweeping changes in our industrial military posture has been the technological revolution during recent decades. In this revolution, research has become central. It also becomes more formalized, complex and costly. A steadily increasing share is conducted for, by or at the direction of the federal government. Today, the solitary inventor tinkering in his shop has been overshadowed by task forces of scientists in laboratories and testing fields. In the same fashion, the free university versity, Historically, the fountainhead of free ideas and scientific discovery has experienced a revolution in the conduct of research. Partly because of the huge costs involved, a government contract becomes virtually a substitute for intellectual curiosity. For every old blackboard, there are now hundreds of new electronic computers. The prospect of domination of the nation's scholars by federal employment, project allocations and the power of money is ever present and is gravely to be regarded. Yet in holding scientific research and discovery in respect, As we should, we must also be alert to the equal and opposite danger that public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific technological elite. It is the task of statesmanship to mold, to balance and to integrate these and other forces, new and old, within the principles of our democratic system, ever aiming towards the supreme goals of our free society.

@SenRonJohnson - Senator Ron Johnson

WARNING: We shouldn’t live for today, plundering and mortgaging our children’s future. RESULT: $1.62 trillion deficit in the first 10 months of FY2023. Almost $33 trillion in total debt with no end in sight. https://t.co/fRmLTNp2c2

Video Transcript AI Summary
Maintaining balance requires considering the element of time. We must resist the temptation to prioritize our own comfort and convenience today at the expense of future generations. By doing so, we risk not only depleting the resources that our grandchildren will need, but also jeopardizing their political and spiritual legacy. Our goal is to ensure that democracy endures for all future generations, rather than becoming a bankrupt ideology.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Another factor in maintaining balance involves the element of time. As we peer into society's future, we, you and I and our government, must avoid the impulse to live only for today, plundering for our own ease and convenience the precious resources of tomorrow. We cannot mourn the material assets of our grandchildren without risking the loss also of their political and spiritual heritage. We want democracy to survive for all generations to come, not to become the insolvent fan of tomorrow.

@SenRonJohnson - Senator Ron Johnson

WARNING: We shouldn’t allow global society to fall into a state of “dreadful fear and hate.” RESULT: Scientific elites scare us with climate and Covid alarmism. Political elites exacerbate division by pushing hate and fear. https://t.co/us2S9LmT1B

Video Transcript AI Summary
In order to create a better world, America believes in avoiding fear and hate, and instead fostering trust and respect. We should treat each other as equals, regardless of strength. It is important to resolve conflicts through peaceful means, using our intellect and good intentions. Disarmament is crucial, and we must continue to work towards it with honor and competence.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: During the long lane of the history yet to be written, America knows that this world of ours ever growing smaller must avoid becoming a community of dreadful fear and hate and be instead a proud confederation of mutual trust and respect. Such a confederation must be one of equals. The weakest must come to the conference table with the same competence as do we, protected as we are by our moral, economic and military strength. That table, though scarred by many fast frustrations cannot be abandoned for the certainty agony of the battlefield. Disarmament with mutual honor and competence is a continuing imperative. Together, we must learn how to compose differences not with arms, but with intellect and decent purpose.

@SenRonJohnson - Senator Ron Johnson

Watch the full video here: https://youtu.be/OyBNmecVtdU

Saved - August 19, 2023 at 6:35 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
59 years ago, the US Government planned a false flag operation called Operation Northwoods to justify a war against Cuba. The proposals included staged acts of terrorism, like remote-controlling civilian aircraft and sinking boats of Cuban refugees. JFK rejected the plan, deepening distrust among the military and intelligence community. JFK's assassination allowed the Military Industrial Complex to profit from escalating the Vietnam War based on false reports. War is profitable for those in power, who will lie and manipulate to maintain authority. Question everything and think for yourself.

@DylanMAllman - Dylan Allman

59 years ago, the US Government killed its own president in broad daylight. Here's why: It starts with Operation Northwoods, a proposed false flag operation that originated within the US Department of Defense in 1962. The proposals called for CIA operatives to both stage and commit acts of terrorism against American military and civilian targets, blaming them on the Cuban government and using them to justify a war against Cuba. The list of potential attacks detailed in the document included... • The remote control of civilian aircraft, which would be secretly repainted as US Air Force planes. • A fabricated 'shoot down' of a US Air Force fighter aircraft off the coast of Cuba. • The assassination of Cuban immigrants by sinking boats of Cuban refugees on the high seas. • Blowing up a U.S. ship and orchestrating terrorism in U.S. cities. The plan was drafted by the Joint Chiefs of Staff, signed by Chairman Lyman Lemnitzer, and sent to the Secretary of Defense before it was rejected by JFK. What decent human being would sign such a thing? In the nuclear exchange with the Soviet Union that would have followed such an attack, more than 300 million human beings worldwide would have been killed. There already existed great distrust towards Kennedy among those in the military and intelligence community who perceived him as having mishandled the CIA's ill-conceived Bay of Pigs invasion. Now, following his rejection of Operation Northwoods, this distrust deepened further. At this time, the Kennedy brothers were making big changes and making powerful enemies in the process. As JFK was working to end the Cold War and the growing power of the Military Industrial Complex, his brother Robert was prosecuting organized crime figures with ties to the mafia who had lots of political influence at the time. The President could no longer be allowed to live. Shortly after JFK was assassinated in Dallas, Lyndon Johnson took over as President. Once President Johnson began escalating the war in Vietnam, All based on a lie. There were reports that Vietnamese torpedo boats had fired on the USS Maddox in the Gulf of Tonkin. Knowing these reports were false, Johnson retaliated for an attack that never occurred. By the end of the war in Southeast Asia, 58,000 Americans and 2 million Asians had been killed. Of course, billions of dollars had been made by defense contractors in the process. To the men who make such great profits, the human cost of war is nothing. The Military Industrial Complex is alive and well. War is not only profitable to those who wage it; it also gives the government an excuse to exert more authority over its subjects. Those in power will find an excuse, and if they can't, they'll make one up. War is murder. Those in power do not care about you. They will sell you out for more power and a quick buck in a heartbeat. Do not fall for their tricks. They will lie us into anything that benefits their interests. If you think this doesn't continue today, you are sadly mistaken. Think for yourself. Question everything.

Saved - September 14, 2023 at 3:38 AM

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

.@RobertKennedyJr: “The Democratic Party used to be anti-war. It’s now at the forefront of promoting these forever wars which are destroying our country." Do you agree?

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims that the Democratic Party unfairly favored Hillary Clinton over Bernie Sanders during the nomination process. They believe that if Sanders had been nominated, the country would be in a different place. The speaker also criticizes the Democratic Party for not supporting true progressive values and for promoting endless wars and corporate interests. They argue that they are an even bigger threat than Sanders and suggest that the party is protecting its donor base, which consists of large donors who expect favors in return. The speaker believes that these donors include military contractors and big corporations benefiting from Democratic policies.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well documented the Democratic Party, put their finger on the scale, their thumbs breath, their foot on the scale to make sure that Bernie Sanders could not get the nomination. I think if Bernie Sanders had gotten the nomination, we would be in a very different place in our country today. And, but I there's an antagonism and antipathy within the Democratic Party for, for people who have true progressive values, people who are challenging the dominance, the predominance Wall Street interests of companies like BlackRock, State Street, Vanguard, and the military industrial complex. The Democratic Party used to be anti war, it's now at the forefront of promoting these forever wars, which are destroying our country. And so, Bernie Sanders was a threat to that infrastructure. And I am 10 times the threat that Bernie Sanders was. And so I think that there's they've they pulled out all the stops to make sure that, that I will not threaten the donor base of the Democrat. The Democrat Party apparently raised $2,000,000,000 already. On that money did not come from regular Americans, that money predominantly comes from very, very large donors who I think we can assume that they're not giving it out of patriotic impulses, they're not giving it that kind of money, you know, tens of 1,000,000 of dollars out of love for humanity, but because they believe that there's a quid pro quo for them from the Democratic Party, the military contractors who want to keep these wars going, and the big corporations or who are benefiting from the policies that are now supported by the Democratic Party.
Saved - October 9, 2023 at 9:40 PM

@17ThankQ - Fletch17

Great find!!!!!!!!! HT @DschlopesIsBack “And you leave those billions of dollars of weapons behind I promise they're going to be used against your grandchild and mine some day" - The Big Guy

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker emphasizes the importance of telling the American people the truth about ending the war. They explain that if the president were to issue an order to end the war and withdraw all American troops, it would take about a year to physically remove them. However, if equipment is left behind, it could be done in 7 months. The speaker warns that leaving behind billions of dollars worth of weapons would result in them being used against future generations.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The big difference to tell the American people the truth about what our options are in ending this war. If tomorrow, The order goes out from the pre I'm president of the United States, issuing an order, end the war today, begin to withdraw all American troops. It will take a year to get the American troops out. Do you hear me now? That's the truth. It will take a year to get them physically out. Now if you leave all equipment behind, you might be able to do it in 7 months. And you leave those 1,000,000,000 of dollars of weapons behind that they're going to be used against your grandchild in mind someday. You leave those 1,000,000,000 of dollars of weapons behind. I promise they're going to be used against your grandchild in mind someday.
Saved - October 12, 2023 at 7:16 AM

@2BLibre - Henry

We should really remember what @georgegalloway explained about jumping the gun on Wars...

Saved - October 12, 2023 at 4:22 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The US and Israel's desire to bomb Iran, even without direct evidence, raises concerns. Similar to the Iraq war, where no involvement was proven, war hawks are rallying again. The Project for a New American Century outlines their agenda. Russia's oil deal with Iran and globalist banker interests against Iran, Russia, and China add complexity. Attacking Iran may escalate tensions with Russia and China. Remember, all wars serve the interests of bankers. Lindsey Graham's war obsession is worrisome.

@Inversionism - Inversionism

"You're saying the you would want the US and Israel to Bomb Iran even in the absence of direct evidence of their involvement in this attack?" Before she even finishes the question, he eagerly says "You got it.....yeah" This clip should clear up any confusion on who Israel and the US truly want to go to war with. Just like 9/11, Iraq had no involvement, and then all the war hawks started rallying in unison (Netanyahu did it numerous times in concern) to go after Saddam based on manufactured CIA intelligence. Now they're moving onto the next domino in the middle east after having toppled and coup'd the ones prior. Go read Project for a New American Century. It's all in there. He's also not telling you that Russia just signed a huge oil and gas deal with Iran last year, nor is he telling you about the globalist banker financial interests against Iran, Russia, China, etc, with the BRICS bank. Going after Iran will bring in Russia and likely China soon after, and then the fireworks really begin. Never forget... All. Wars. Are. Bankers. Wars. @LindseyGrahamSC go find yourself a nursing home you war obsessed lunatic.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker suggests bombing Iran's oil infrastructure as a response to their alleged financing of terrorism. They believe it is time for Iran to face consequences for supporting chaos. They clarify that if war escalates, they will come after Iran. Speaker 1 seeks clarification, asking if the speaker wants the US and Israel to bomb Iran without direct evidence of their involvement in the attack. The speaker confirms this.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What I would do is I would bomb Iran's oil infrastructure. The money financing terrorism comes from Iran. It's time for this terrorist state to pay a price for financing and supporting all this chaos. Yes. If you're the Iranians, if it were up to me. This war escalates. I'm coming after you. Speaker 1: I think this is what I'm trying to clarify here because I I'm wondering if what's your Speaker 0: Us to Israel. Speaker 1: The United States and Israel crystal clear. The United let me just let me just, let me just understand you just to be clear. You're saying that you would want the United States and Israel to bomb Iran even in the absence of direct evidence of Their involvement in this attack. Speaker 0: Yeah.
Saved - October 21, 2023 at 8:01 PM

@Yeahaboutthat3 - MoCheezePlz

Military Vets know why we went to War in the Middle East. And they aren't pleased.. https://t.co/2aI8BpGldR

Video Transcript AI Summary
I am returning my global war on terrorism medal and national defense medal because they are both fives. I am giving back my medals for the people of Afghanistan, Iraq, Palestine, and all victims of occupation worldwide. Specifically, I dedicate this medal to the children of Iraq who have lost their parents. As a nuclear, biological, and chemical specialist, I served in a war that had no weapons of mass destruction, leading me to desert. I am one of 40,000 individuals who left the US Armed Forces due to this lie. Do these medals truly acknowledge a job well done, or do they conceal lies, corruption, and the mistreatment of young men and women?
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm here to return my global war on terrorism medal and my national defense medal because they're both fives. Speaker 1: And I'm turning in these medals today for the people of Afghanistan, Iraq, Palestine, and all victims of occupation across the world. And I'm giving back my medals for the children of Iraq and Afghanistan. May they be they be able to forgive us for all you've done to them. This medal I'm dedicating to the children of Iraq that no longer have fathers and mothers. I was a nuclear a biological chemical specialist for a war that didn't have any weapons of mass destruction. So I Deserted. I'm one of 40,000 people that left the United States Armed Forces because this is a lie. Speaker 0: Was any of this worth it? Do these medals thank us for a job well done? Do they mask lies, corruption, and abuse of young men and women?
Saved - October 23, 2023 at 9:27 PM

@TheGeorgeHQ - GEORGE

🚨 @elonmusk: "We're sleepwalking our way into WW3." https://t.co/FAlcRIs625

Video Transcript AI Summary
We may be sleepwalking into World War 3 due to a series of foolish decisions. It's important for people to reflect on their predictions and consider their track record. In the investing and VC world, track...
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I I I think we are sleepwalking our way into World War 3 sleepwalking our way into World War 3 with with one foolish decision after another, as you as you outlined, David. And and really people should be deeply self reflective. If they if their predictions have not come true, they should consider whether perhaps their other predictions might not come true either. I mean, what is the track record here? It's not good. Speaker 1: You know, it's funny. In in the investing world, out. You know, in the VC world in which, you know, we we operate, track
Saved - November 3, 2023 at 3:49 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Shi'a militias have launched numerous attacks on US bases since the killing of Soleimani. Despite Iraq's call for US forces to leave, they remain. The recent strikes are not unusual enough to justify US escalation into a catastrophic war. The war machine's corporate puppeteers prioritize profit over lives and the global economy. We need new leadership to contain the conflict and rely on Tehran's restraint. It's time for a responsible approach to maintain peace.

@amaryllisfox - Amaryllis Fox

This is what craven provocation of war looks like. Shi'a militias have launched over a hundred fifty attacks against US bases since we killed Soleimani in 2020. Much like Israel's lobbing of missiles across the Lebanese border, this activity has been in the normal range of the Middle East's delicate status quo. The US has tolerated it, given its troops remain in Iraq, a majority Shi'a country, even after Iraq's legislature unanimously voted for US Forces to leave its territory in 2020, US Forces have killed over 300,000 civilians in Iraq and Syria, and our military operations in both countries are egregious violations of international law. Any claim that recent Shi'a militia strikes are unusual enough to justify US escalation into a potentially catastrophic regional war are fatuous chunks of red meat designed to be repeated by useful idiots. The corporate puppeteers of our war machine are revving up their money machines without a single thought for the blood that may be spilled or the calamitous damage to the global economy (and your cost of living) that may result. Until we get such corrupt influences out of govt, our only hope to keep this conflict contained is praying for the restraint of Tehran's response. You know it's time for new leadership in Washington when the current crop leave you dependent on the mullahs' good judgement to keep your country out of war. Time for a grown-up in the situation room and a return to American strength by keeping the peace. #Kennedy24 #Syria #Iran #Biden #Trump #WarMachine

Saved - November 9, 2023 at 9:24 PM

@BowesChay - Chay Bowes

Since its foundation in 1776, the United States has been at War for all but 16 years of its existence. Millions Dead, Trillions wasted, Nothing learned. https://t.co/PV7JZv53AC

Saved - January 15, 2024 at 9:14 PM

@algadibadeel - محمد القاضي

@ysabellahazan If you want to see who really the war monger is ? ... look at this 😳‼️ https://t.co/5fXt8Gw1AF

Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, the speakers discuss the need for regime change in the Middle East. They mention that removing the Soviet Union and the PLO would end international terrorism. They also express a desire for regime change in Iraq and Iran, and mention Libya's pursuit of nuclear weapons. One speaker emphasizes the importance of standing with Israel. The video concludes with a derogatory comment about the people applauding.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: How crazy this is. And and if you wanna see who the real warmonger is in the Middle East, who the real psychopathic murderer is, or the guy who's the unstable, terrorist in the Middle East. Let's watch this again. Speaker 1: If you take away the Soviet Union and its chief proxy, the PLO, international terrorism would collapse. If you take out Saddam, Saddam's regime, I guarantee you that it will have enormous positive reverberations on the region. Obviously, we'd like to see a regime change, at least I would In Iran, just as I would like to see in Iraq. The question now is a practical question. It's not a question of whether Iraq's regime should be taken out, but when should it be taken out? It's not a question of whether you'd like to see a regime change in Iran, but how do Speaker 0: we Are there any other nations that you would recommend that the United States launch preemptive attacks upon at this point? Speaker 1: The answer is categorically yes, is Iraq and Iran, but a third nation, by the way, is Libya as well. Libya is trying very rapidly to build and atomic bomb capability. So you have here now 3 names. Speaker 2: All stand together to stop Iran's march of conquest, subjugation, and terror. I know that no matter on which side of the aisle you sit, you stand with Israel. Speaker 0: And all those clowns applauding are, some of the most unscrupulous, easily corrupted motherfuckers you've ever met in your life.
Saved - May 3, 2024 at 11:26 PM

@bibi_satanyahu - Maximus MadHam 🗽

General Wesley Clark told us about Pentagon’s agenda in advance. https://t.co/MgEZiQXiWO

Video Transcript AI Summary
A group of individuals orchestrated a policy coup to take over the government and destabilize the Middle East for control. This plan was not openly discussed or debated in the US, despite its significant impact.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And change governments. It's not to sort of deter conflict. We're gonna invade countries and I I I, you know, my mind was spinning. And, I put that aside. It was like a nugget that you hold on to. This country was taken over by a group of people with a policy coup. Wolfowitz and Cheney and Rumsfeld, and you could name a half dozen other collaborators from the Project for a New American Century. They wanted us to destabilize the Middle East, turn it upside down, make it under our control. It went back to those comments in 1991. Now did anybody ever tell you that? Was there a national dialogue on this? Did senators and congressmen stand up and denounce this plan? Was there a full fledged American debate on it? Absolutely not. And there still isn't.
Saved - June 12, 2024 at 9:31 AM

@crom_oliver - Oliver Crom

@jimmy_dore When a country joins NATO, they have to buy their Weapons from. "Approved" Companies! To Enable cohesion! "War Machine Profit"! It's so much more important, than Human Lives! https://t.co/PoYGgQUbQD

Video Transcript AI Summary
NATO is expanding aggressively, pressuring countries to join or face destruction and resource theft. The real power lies with the war machine, not the smiling faces in front of you. The focus is on profit, not the well-being of people. The situation in Ukraine is being ignored, with lies and manipulation at play. Ukraine is suffering, but NATO remains silent.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The North Atlantic Treaty Organization. We're expanding, and we've been busy. Any country that doesn't wanna join the alliance, well, we simply make them an offer. They can't refuse. Speaker 1: You see, Speaker 0: if you're not part of the alliance, we may one day have to bond. Destroy your country and your culture, Speaker 1: and then steal all of your natural resources. Speaker 0: You see, we do this for the people who are really in charge. The war machine. But, hey, don't worry. The smiling faces you see in front of you, Warner, will be nowhere near the battlefield Just like Zelensky. And are we the baddies? Speaker 1: They'll never let you see just how much pain and death and there's a we need so designed through expensive deadlines but now the question reflects why they've been lying by you. And as we wrote the book on all the orders Wendy and Anne took, Wilburton sent files politicians and Smiles who's profiteering their game. Speaker 0: They've gone real quiet on Ukraine. Speaker 1: Their lion was done, and they roll all their words right into 1. Death camp displayed on Ukraine. They've gone real quiet on Ukraine. They've gone real quiet on Ukraine.
Saved - July 9, 2024 at 11:11 PM

@FreeSpe88394786 - Free Speech

@Gabbar0099 The wars we have financed.

@WeAreWoke1776_3 - We Have It All

ALL the USA has done is destroy countries and people. WAR is NEVER the answer. EVER. https://t.co/bPosJt5yzp

Video Transcript AI Summary
In democratic countries, neighbors are not invaded, tariffs are not imposed, and weapons are not used for destruction or to give instructions.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Democratic countries actually don't invade their neighbors. Democratic countries don't harbor tariffs. Democratic countries don't use weapons to pass instructions. Don't use weapons to past destruction.
Saved - November 4, 2024 at 5:24 AM

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

10 wars, millions killed, trillions wasted, 1 nobel peace prize, 0 indictments https://t.co/XNn2Cq9q9I

Saved - November 12, 2024 at 7:59 AM

@dbenner83 - Dave Benner, Nemesis of Neocons

@elonmusk Robert F. Kennedy also did an excellent job of summarizing the lead-up to the war in Ukraine here as well: https://t.co/kd0sJ5Bj48

Video Transcript AI Summary
Putin claims he wants to negotiate the war, but Zelensky refuses. Historically, Russia has faced invasions through Ukraine, including by Hitler. After the Soviet Union's fall, Gorbachev allowed German reunification under NATO, seeking a promise not to expand NATO eastward. However, NATO expanded into 14 countries, and the U.S. withdrew from nuclear treaties, placing missiles near Russia. In 2014, the U.S. supported a government change in Ukraine, prompting Russia's annexation of Crimea. Zelensky, initially promising peace, faced pressure from the U.S. and couldn't sign the Minsk Accords. Russia's limited military presence aimed to negotiate, but U.S. intervention led to the treaty's collapse. This has resulted in significant casualties, with the perception of the U.S. as the aggressor growing globally.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You know, Putin every day says, I wanna settle the war. Let's negotiate. And Zelensky has said, we're not gonna negotiate. But Zelensky didn't start that way. I don't wanna, you know, delay the history, but Russia was invaded 3 times through Ukraine. The last time Hitler killed 1 out of every 7 Russians. They don't want to have Ukraine join NATO. So when the wall came down in the Soviet Union Europe, Gorbachev destroyed himself politically by doing something that was very, very courageous. He went to Bush, and he said, I'm going to allow you to reunify Germany under a NATO army. I'm gonna remove 450,000 Soviet troops, but I want your commitment. After that, you will not move NATO 1 inch to the east, and we've solemnly swore we wouldn't do it. Well, then in 97, Brzezinski was the first of the neocons said, we're gonna move NATO a 1000 miles to the east and take 15 countries into it and surround the Soviet Union. So then we not only move it into 14 new nations, but we unilaterally walk away from our 2 nuclear weapons treaties with the Russians. And we put Aegis missile systems in Romania and Poland 12 minutes from Moscow. When Russians did that to Cuba in 62, we came this close to nuclear war until they removed them. So the Russians don't want nukes 400 miles from Moscow. We then overthrow the Ukraine government. In 2014, they're elected government and put in a western sympathetic government. Russia then has to go into Crimea because they have a port. It's their only warm water port, and they know the new government that we just installed is gonna invite the US Navy into their port. So Russia then went into Crimea without firing a shot because the people of Crimea are Russian. Then the new Ukrainian government we installed started killing ethnic Russians in and they voted to leave and join Russia. Putin said, I don't want them. Let's give them protection and give them semi autonomy and make an agreement to keep NATO out of Ukraine. That treaty was written by Germany, France, Russia, and England, the Minsk Accords. And the Ukrainian parliament, which is controlled by ultra writers, and that's a nice way of of talking about them, refused to sign it. Zelensky runs in 2019. He's an actor. Why did he get elected with 70% of vote? Because he promised to sign the Minsk Accords. He promised peace. He gets in there, and he pivots. Nobody can explain why, but we know why. Because he was threatened with death by arthritis in his government and a withdrawal of support by the United States by Victoria Newan, who's the leading the economy state department. We told him he could not sign it. So then the Russians go in. They don't send a big army. They only send 40,000 people. It's a nation of 44,000,000 people. They clearly do not intend to conquer Ukraine, but they want us back at the negotiating table. We won't allow Zelensky to go back. So he goes to Israel and Turkey and says, will you please help me negotiate a treaty? The Russians just want I guarantee that Ukraine won't join NATO. Zelensky signs the treaty. Putin's people sign the treaty, and Putin starts withdrawing the Russian troops in good faith. And what happens, Joe Biden sends Boris Johnson, the British prime minister, over to Ukraine in April and forces him to tear up the treaty. And since then, 450,000 kids have died who none of them should have died. For every one Russian that dies, 5 to 8 Ukrainians died, they don't have any men left. You know, we're giving them all these weapons, but they don't have men left. It's a catastrophe, and we look kinda like the aggressor. That's the way the rest of the world sees us.
Saved - June 19, 2025 at 10:40 PM

@_rathbone - Rathbone

A reminder that every president is a war criminal, even Jimmy Carter. 🇺🇸 https://t.co/V8PiamYFtt

Video Transcript AI Summary
Ordered Cambodian genocide. Sent cruise missiles to Sudan. Gave the orders to do drones Friday.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Ordered Cambodian genocide and sent cruise missiles to Sudan people. Gave the orders to do drones Friday. Beta
Saved - January 2, 2025 at 3:25 AM

@TheRISEofROD - Machiavelli

Do you understand why ✡️ did 9/11 to push America into Middle East war? There were never “weapons of mass destruction” but Cheney’s Halliburton actually made $Billions while millions of innocent people died. Netanyajew got what he wanted too. No More Fucking Wars For Israel 🤬 https://t.co/CfH8XwrxnL

Saved - January 15, 2025 at 1:48 AM

@RattusIncognito - Mesocricetus Incognitus

@BowesChay Well done. But does the U.S. really “have the resources to support both its international commitments and domestic needs?” Those “international commitments” can be summed up easily: 🌟Supporting the wrong side in every war, including the few we didn’t start🌟 https://t.co/qlPtMvGhHc

Saved - March 4, 2025 at 12:25 PM

@JamesMelville - James Melville 🚜

A timely reminder of what Julian Assange said back in 2011: "The goal is an endless war, not a successful war." https://t.co/BIjM2IzXKM

Video Transcript AI Summary
The real objective in Afghanistan isn't conquest. It's about creating a system to funnel money from the U.S. and European taxpayers, cycle it through Afghanistan, and ultimately channel it back to a global security network. The aim is to perpetuate an endless conflict, not to achieve victory or resolution.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Because the goal is not to completely subjugate Afghanistan. The goal is to use Afghanistan to wash money out of the tax bases of the United States, out of the tax bases of European countries, countries through Afghanistan and back into the hands of a transnational security army. That is the goal. IE, the goal is to have an endless war, not a successful war.
Saved - June 23, 2025 at 10:18 PM

@DougAMacgregor - Douglas Macgregor

War with Iran is likely to walk The United States directly into WW III. Let's avoid this! https://t.co/K7Sv5NkwhA

Saved - August 3, 2025 at 8:16 AM

@nidal_shehadeh - nidal shehadeh

When will you people stop playing Russian roulette with humanity, you have taken humanity to the edge of Extinction on more than one occasion it's about time that you choose peace instead of being a bunch of European warlike carpet baggers,have you apologized for the USS Liberty? https://t.co/vlKvW1q1oS

Video Transcript AI Summary
A speaker claims an event was a thousand times worse than the Cuban Missile Crisis but unknown. He told his crew they were facing a serious action, and only one man opted out. Another speaker states he was ordered to prepare air squadrons to bomb military and communications targets in Israel. Dick Thompson, a retired CIA agent, was told by Shotsky that he was ordered to launch nukes against Israel as soon as a nuclear weapon detonated in Cairo.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You know how much press the nuclear warheads got when they landed in Cuba? Well, this was a thousand times worse, but nobody knows about it. I lined up my boys on the deck and said, lads, it seems like we're going to take part in a very serious action. Those who are not ready to risk their lives should step ahead. Only one stepped ahead. Speaker 1: I was told to get my air squadrons ready to equip the airplanes with bombs and to be ready to strike military and communications targets in Israel. Speaker 0: Dick Thompson was retired CIA. He knew his way around. Shotsky told him that they had ordered him to launch nukes against Israel as soon as the first nuclear weapon was detonated in Cairo.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Admiral Martin ordered four planes with nuclear warheads from the America aircraft carrier to Cairo. Vyshevsky planned to target the Dome Of The Rock with surface-to-surface missiles that required high reflectivity, to be detonated after the first nuclear weapon hit Cairo. A Strategic Air Defense Command pilot in California was ready to launch a nuclear attack on China and the Soviet Union hours before the USS Liberty attack. He stood down because of the attack on the Liberty. Strategic Air Command headquarters is located in Nebraska. An airman in Nebraska reported an alert on the morning of June 8th that had them preparing to scramble. The Strategic Air Command at Moffett Air Force Base is located 10 miles south of Omaha, Nebraska.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In Cairo. Admiral Martin ordered four planes off the America aircraft carrier with nuclear warheads to be headed to Cairo. Speaker 1: Vyshevsky was was faced with a dilemma because he had surface to surface missiles, he said, and they required high reflectivity, but he said that he had to have something with high reflectivity, so he had targeted the Dome Of The Rock. So as soon as the first nuclear weapon was detonated in Cairo, the Dome Of The Rock would be disintegrated. Speaker 2: I interviewed a pilot who was part of the Strategic Air Defense Command in The US who was stationed in California. Speaker 3: The mission of the strategic air command is Speaker 4: to be prepared to conduct strategic air operations on a global basis so that in the Speaker 3: event of sudden aggression, SAC could immediately mount Speaker 4: simultaneous nuclear attacks. Speaker 2: He was on the runway hours before the USS Liberty was attacked, ready to launch a nuclear attack on China and The Soviet Union. And he only found out afterwards when he was to stand down that it had been because of the attack on the Liberty. Speaker 5: From from a Nebraska standpoint, that's where our Strategic Air Command, you know, headquarters is located. Speaker 4: We are in the command post of the Strategic Air Command at Moffett Air Force Base, 10 miles south of Omaha, Nebraska. Speaker 5: Long after the attack, I had heard from a an airman who was out in Nebraska Avenue. He said on the morning of June 8, they had an alert that had them go to their ready room for preparation for scrambling. Speaker 4: It just scares me to death every time it blows back from the head with daily test, I jump. Even if I'm looking at my watch and going to blow in the next five seconds, I jump.
Video Transcript AI Summary
One speaker states they jump at the sound of a horn and turn pale. Another speaker questions why a group would scramble four hours before an attack. Maintaining nuclear deterrents demands control. There was a plan to bring Russia into a potential third world war. One person states they elevated to battle preparedness level one in the entire fleet. Another speaker claims they were minutes from this happening when orders came from Washington to stop the attack. One speaker claims they were six minutes from World War Three, which would have been worse than anything in history. Another speaker tracked down David Ness, the acting ambassador in Cairo, who received urgent messages to evacuate the embassy and destroy secret materials because Cairo was going to be attacked in reprisal for the Liberty. The Navy was preparing a message.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: As I jump. Even if I'm looking at my watch and don't blow in the next five seconds, jump. And in fact, at home, if I I hear something that sounds like a horn, I usually jump. And I turn pale, I'm sure. Sure, and I run to the thing like crazy. Speaker 1: Now they weren't briefed yet as to where they were going. They were just in the ready room. And 4AM would have been 10AM our time over there, long before the attack. So if you know, we didn't get hit until two in the afternoon, fourteen hundred Zulu time. So why would they have scrambled, you know, four hours before anything had even developed over in our area? Speaker 0: Maintaining a nuclear deterrent demands precise and positive control of the force. There Speaker 2: was a plan to bring Russia and bring everybody into the fold of things and and start a a potential third world war. Speaker 3: No business moment. Speaker 4: Well, I'll use the DEFCON terminology. We actually elevated to battle preparedness level one in the entire fleet, and all these ships in that in that fleet were supposed to maintain battle preparedness number one. Speaker 3: We were in within probably only minutes of that happening when orders came through from Washington, and there are several stories of people who overheard McNamara, the defense secretary, and the president, Lyndon Johnson, shouting down the phone, stop the attack. Call everybody back. Speaker 2: We were six minutes from World War three. It was gonna be worse than anything that we'd ever seen in history before. Speaker 3: One of the interesting witnesses that I tracked down in in all this was a man called David Ness who was the acting ambassador in Cairo at the time. On the day that the Liberty was attacked, he gets messages, urgent messages saying, you must you must get out of the embassy. You must destroy all your secret materials. Cairo is going to be attacked in reprisal for the liberty. Speaker 1: There was this message that they the navy was preparing to

@nidal_shehadeh - nidal shehadeh

@Isaac_Herzog People who live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones. https://t.co/7fBkqXT8cl

View Full Interactive Feed