reSee.it - Related Post Feed

Posted - March 28, 2023 at 11:11 PM

Saved - March 30, 2023 at 4:45 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

The Labour Party's petition challenging the election results appears to be a ploy to keep their supporters engaged. The petitioners failed to meet the minimum spread required by the Constitution, even in states where they claimed to have won. The President-elect won three geopolitical zones and finished second in the other three. The petitioners' case is weak, and their alternative prayers are unlikely to succeed. Nigerians should join hands with the President-elect and Vice President-elect to kick-start the Nigerian industrial and agricultural revolution.

@Green_rebel234 - Asiwaju Hype Man®

DISSECTING THE PETITION OF THE LABOUR PARTY PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE: PART 4 By Michael Chibuzo CONCLUSION From the contents of the entire petition filed by Mr. Peter Obi and the Labour Party, it is very glaring that the legal team of the Petitioners are simply.... A Thread

Video Transcript AI Summary

We were confident in our ability to defeat the opposition. We believed we were the superior team, well-prepared and ready to face any challenge. We had a strong leader, government, president, and vice president.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: I didn't see how the opposition, that team could beat us. Really, with all due respect to them, we were just a better side. We're just a better team. We're better prepared, and we responded, to every challenge we anticipated, we planned, we prepared, we checked, we rechecked. And I say you alone. Yes sir. We also had a leader and a government and a president and vice president who

@Green_rebel234 - Asiwaju Hype Man®

2/ ...embarking on a judicial voyage to entertain their fans and supporters and manage their post-election disappointment in addition to keeping them engaged with talking points until the next election cycle. When you look at all the prayers and alternative prayers contained...

@Green_rebel234 - Asiwaju Hype Man®

3/ ...the petition, it smacks of clout chasing or what the Gen Z will call cruise. In the entire petition for instance, the only places where the petitioners made any reasonable attempt to dispute the result of the election as announced by INEC were in Rivers State and...

@Green_rebel234 - Asiwaju Hype Man®

4/ ...Benue State, where they claimed they won by polling 205,110 votes and 329,003 votes respectively. In both places, the President-elect was declared winner by INEC. Ironically, the petitioners based their claim on the output of same collation process they are trying to...

@Green_rebel234 - Asiwaju Hype Man®

5/ ...discredit due to the slow upload of electronically transmitted results from the polling units to the IREV portal. The petitioners also cannot in good conscience claim or prove they got up to 25% of the votes cast in Sokoto (6568 out of the 586,785 total votes)...

@Green_rebel234 - Asiwaju Hype Man®

6/ ...Zamfara (1660 out of 498,078 total votes), Kebbi (10682 out of the 548,983 total votes), Katsina (6376 out of the 1,047,090 total votes), Kano (28,513 out of the 1,674,849 total votes; even PDP couldn't secure 25% here), Jigawa (1889 out of the 908,100 total votes)...

@Green_rebel234 - Asiwaju Hype Man®

7/ ...Niger (80,452 out of the 762,369 total votes; the modest votes here is due to FCT factor), Gombe (26,160 out of the 502,780 total votes), Kwara (31,116 out of the 434,738 total votes), Borno (7,205 out of the 455,034 total votes), Yobe (2,406 out of the 370,702 total votes)

@Green_rebel234 - Asiwaju Hype Man®

8/ ...Kogi (56,217 out of the 446,310 total votes), Adamawa (105,648 out of the 714,146 total votes; the votes reflected the sizeable Christian population in the state) and Bauchi (27,373 out of the 842,777 total votes) states where even the deaf and blind know its difficult...

@Green_rebel234 - Asiwaju Hype Man®

9/ ...for the petitioner to garner one quarter of the votes cast due to the kind of rhetoric and message of the Candidate during the campaigns which would not have gotten wide support from the voters in these states. Subtract these 14 states from 37 states (including the FCT)...

@Green_rebel234 - Asiwaju Hype Man®

10/ ...and you're left with 23 states. Therefore, before you even begin to subtract the South West States of Ogun, Oyo, Osun, Ekiti and Ondo where the petitioner also failed to get 25%, he has already failed to meet the minimum spread required by the Constitution. One is now...

@Green_rebel234 - Asiwaju Hype Man®

11/ ...left scratching the head to understand how exactly the petitioner feels he won the election going strictly by the contents of his petition. A look at the presidential election results from the 36 states and the FCT, one can clearly see that it reflects the accurate...

@Green_rebel234 - Asiwaju Hype Man®

12/ ...voting pattern in these areas. The President-elect, Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu was able to win because he went out to compete for votes in five out of the six geopolitical zones. In the North West, he won two states and came a very close 2nd position in the other five...

@Green_rebel234 - Asiwaju Hype Man®

13/ ...states where PDP or NNPP won. Overall, he got the highest number of votes in the North West. In the North Central, the President-elect equally had a very dominant showing, winning four states (Kwara, Niger, Kogi and Benue) out of the seven states while finishing...

@Green_rebel234 - Asiwaju Hype Man®

14/ ...a close second in Plateau and Nasarawa States. In the North East Alhaji Atiku Abubakar won in five out of the six states in his home region with the President-elect winning only Borno States where his running mate comes from. That notwithstanding, President-elect Tinubu...

@Green_rebel234 - Asiwaju Hype Man®

15/ ...finished second in Bauchi, Adamawa, Gombe and Yobe states while getting 27% of the votes in Taraba State just behind @PeterObi who finished 2nd with 29% of the votes. Now, when you look at the performance of the petitioner in the entire 19 northern states, you will...

@Green_rebel234 - Asiwaju Hype Man®

16/ ...see a predictable pattern - he won in Nasarawa, Plateau and the FCT and was runner up in Benue and Taraba States. Plateau, Benue and Taraba are states with Christian majority, which made many embrace his message in protest to the same faith ticket of the APC.

@Green_rebel234 - Asiwaju Hype Man®

17/ ...The victory of the petitioner in Nasarawa state may be surprising to many but on a closer analysis you will immediately understand what transpired. The state has a very sizeable Christian population and tend to be pro-PDP. In the 2023 polls, @officialABAT polled 172,922...

@Green_rebel234 - Asiwaju Hype Man®

18/ ..while Atiku of the PDP polled 147,093 votes. The petitioner, Mr. Obi won by polling 191,361 votes. When you combine the votes of PDP and APC in the state, you will get 320,015 votes. In 2015 when President Buhari squared against President Jonathan, Jonathan won Nasarawa...

@Green_rebel234 - Asiwaju Hype Man®

19/ ...after polling 273,460 votes while Buhari got 236,838 votes. In 2019, Buhari won Nasarawa State for the first time by polling 289,903 votes while Atiku Abubakar came a close second with 283,847 votes - a difference of 6,000 votes. So, in 2023 what happened basically...

@Green_rebel234 - Asiwaju Hype Man®

20/ ...was that the Christian bloc votes (who were usually pro-PDP) went to the petitioner who emerged as the third force and appealed to their Christian sentiment. The APC and the PDP were then left to split the usually Muslim majority votes of 320,015 votes. So, we can...

@Green_rebel234 - Asiwaju Hype Man®

21/ ...now see the @PeterObi win in Nasarawa state from the proper prism. When we come to the South, the President-elect won four out of the six states in his South West geopolitical zone, losing Lagos and Osun States narrowly to the @PeterObi and Atiku Abubakar respectively.

@Green_rebel234 - Asiwaju Hype Man®

22/ In the South South, the President-elect was declared winner in Rivers State (contested by the petitioner) and finished second in Akwa Ibom ahead of the petitioner who failed to get 25% in the state. In Bayelsa, the President-elect finished 3rd in a close contest just...

@Green_rebel234 - Asiwaju Hype Man®

23/ ...behind @PeterObi but got 25% of the votes while in Cross River State, the President-elect finished second with 31% behind the petitioner who won the State. In Edo State, the President-elect equally finished behind @PeterObi in 2nd even though he failed to secure 25%...

@Green_rebel234 - Asiwaju Hype Man®

24/ ...of the votes just like in Delta State. In the South East, the home region of the Petitioner, he performed very well by winning the five states in a landslide (it is ironic that the petitioner did not question the results from most states in the South East, where...

@Green_rebel234 - Asiwaju Hype Man®

25/ ...the collation process followed the same manual method INEC used across the country and where upload of the already electronically transmitted polling unit results to the IREV portal were equally delayed like in other parts of the country). Despite the poor showing of...

@Green_rebel234 - Asiwaju Hype Man®

26/ ...@officialABAT in the South East, the President-elect still finished 2nd in Imo and Ebonyi States and equally finished 2nd overall in the South East. We can see clearly from the above breakdown that the President-elect Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu won 3 geopolitical zones...

@Green_rebel234 - Asiwaju Hype Man®

27/ ...and finished second in the other three that he did not win. That's how to achieve national spread and win a Presidential election! Now, when you factor all these voting patterns, you will see that the pathway of victory of the President-elect is as clear as broad day light

@Green_rebel234 - Asiwaju Hype Man®

28/ ...and then you begin to wonder why exactly the petitioners really think they have a case if not to keep their base engaged and sell a fleeting hope to them. When you marry the three grounds upon which the petition is built, the pathway the petitioner is attempting to...

@Green_rebel234 - Asiwaju Hype Man®

29/ ...cling on becomes obvious. @PeterObi is simply trying to bring the court to disqualify the President-elect on the grounds of alleged double nomination of his running mate & alleged fine of $460,000 handed to the 2nd Respondent in 1993 (29 years ago) by a Court in Illinois.

@Green_rebel234 - Asiwaju Hype Man®

30/ Then if, in the unlikely event that the 2nd Respondent is disqualified, it means his votes are removed from the equation and the votes that would remain principally will be that of the Petitioner and Alhaji Atiku Abubakar, the first runner-up in the election. Even at that...

@Green_rebel234 - Asiwaju Hype Man®

31/ ...a recalculation of the 25% spread will still not see the petitioners meeting the 24 state threshold stipulated in the Constitution. This is why @PeterObi is equally asking the court to extract some votes from the 2nd Respondent before he is disqualified by alleging...

@Green_rebel234 - Asiwaju Hype Man®

32/ ...that many of his votes were unlawfully credited to the 2nd Respondent in many polling units. Unfortunately for the petitioners, even that is not enough to enable him meet the requirements of Section 134(2) hence his alternative prayers to the court to cancel the entire...

@Green_rebel234 - Asiwaju Hype Man®

33/ ...election and mandate INEC to conduct a fresh election in which the 2nd Respondent, President-elect Bola Tinubu will not be participating (having been disqualified based on ground 1 of their petition). @PeterObi in another alternative prayer begs the court instead...

@Green_rebel234 - Asiwaju Hype Man®

34/ ...to order for a runoff election between him and the next nearest challenger, @atiku in the event that the court determines that none of the remaining candidates met the requirement of Section 134(2) of the Constitution. @PeterObi did not claim that BVAS did not work...

@Green_rebel234 - Asiwaju Hype Man®

35/ ...which means it should be easy for them prove their claims of vote rigging and reallocation if they have any credible evidence. However, to me, this is perhaps the biggest election petition circus we will witness in our democratic history. Inasmuch as I am glad that...

@Green_rebel234 - Asiwaju Hype Man®

36/ ...the petition as shallow and disjointed as it is, will afford the judiciary the opportunity to further cement the interpretation of Section 134(2)b, I believe that our democratic process would have benefited more if the Petitioner simply did the honourable thing and placed

@Green_rebel234 - Asiwaju Hype Man®

37/ ...a call conceding defeat to the President-elect Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu the moment it became obvious that he had lost. This would have afforded the nation the golden opportunity to build on the success of the BVAS and fix few of the loopholes and logistical challenges...

@Green_rebel234 - Asiwaju Hype Man®

38/ ...identified in the Presidential Election. However, it is still a good thing for aggrieved parties to seek redress in court instead of the streets, even though the action and utterances of @PeterObi and Datti Ahmed since their defeat, notwithstanding their petition in court

@Green_rebel234 - Asiwaju Hype Man®

39/ ...against the outcome of the election, has been so toxic and inciting with a clear calculated attempt at rubbishing the credibility of the judiciary and hence lay the ground work for discrediting the anticipated verdict from the courts which will definitely dismiss their...

@Green_rebel234 - Asiwaju Hype Man®

40/ ...suit and uphold the electoral victory of the President-elect Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu. I therefore implore Nigerians to keep faith with our burgeoning democracy, frustrate the sinister agenda of anti-democratic elements bent on foisting an interim national government...

@Green_rebel234 - Asiwaju Hype Man®

41/ ...on Nigeria and join hands with the President-elect @officialABAT and Vice President-elect Kashim Shettima as they lead us in this great journey of National Hope Renewal. It is time to lower the temperature, discard the toxic rhetorics and join hands to kick start the...

@Green_rebel234 - Asiwaju Hype Man®

42/ ...great Nigerian industrial and agricultural revolution that will deliver shared prosperity to all Nigerians. Let's do this for the love of country and for our future generations!

@RNCResearch — RNC Research

Posted - August 2, 2023 at 2:51 AM

Saved - August 2, 2023 at 3:46 AM

@RNCResearch - RNC Research

Here are 24 STRAIGHT MINUTES of Democrats denying election results

Video Transcript AI Summary

The speakers in the video discuss their belief that the 2016 and 2020 elections were stolen or illegitimate due to Russian interference, voter suppression, and issues with electronic voting machines. They express concerns about the integrity of the election process and question the legitimacy of the elected officials. They also mention specific instances such as the 2000 election and the Georgia gubernatorial race. Overall, they argue that the elections were not fair and call for reforms to ensure a more transparent and accurate voting system.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: You can Speaker 1: run the best campaign. You can even become the nominee. And you can have the election stolen Speaker 2: from you. Speaker 3: How can you win with Russian interference, though? Speaker 2: That's the real thing. Cared about Speaker 1: it in 2020. But rightly. Speaker 2: Because I think I'm taking Speaker 3: an illegitimate president that didn't really win. So how do Speaker 2: you, you know, fight against that in 2020? You are absolutely right. He is an illegitimate president in my mind. Could you Speaker 4: be my vice president for Denimid president in my mind. Speaker 2: Could you be my vice president for candidate? Paul Brooks, I absolutely agree. Trump didn't actually win the election in 2016. He lost the election, and he was put in the office because the Russians interfered. Speaker 5: Russia interfered with our election, attacked our democracy for the sole purpose of artificially placing someone at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, they were successful. Speaker 1: Trump knows he's as an illegitimate president. Speaker 3: The president will elect, although legally elected, is not legitimate. Unless it is president-elect As a legitimate president. Speaker 6: You said you believe that Russia's interference altered the outcome of the election. Speaker 1: I do. We have a president who, if In fact, it is proven, has been assisted by the Russians and may, in fact, not be a legitimate president. The one thing that Trump Is fearful of, when it comes to his being president, is that finally, we will see how illegitimate his victory actually was. Speaker 2: I have an objection. Speaker 7: I object to the 15 votes from the state of North Carolina. I object because people are horrified. Speaker 6: He's an illegitimate president. Our election was hijacked. There is no question. Congress has a duty to hashtag protect our democracy and hashtag follow the facts. Speaker 5: John Lewis is completely right. There is a cloud of legitimacy around the election of Donald Trump. The Russians interfered with his election. James Comey and the FBI interfered with his, Election. The fake news industry interfered with his election. Speaker 1: Trump knows he's an illegitimate president who got illegitimate foreign powers. Do you believe Trump is a legitimate president? Speaker 4: What I believe is that there's no question that the outcome of this election was affected by the Russian interference. Speaker 2: There actually is a cloud of Okay. Legitimacy. Speaker 6: So that legitimacy is the question. Yes. Speaker 3: So that was a very tainted election. And and in that sense, it's it's illegitimate. Speaker 1: Why Why do you think the president is going to such great lengths to essentially prove that he beat you? Because he knows he didn't. He knows he's an illegitimate president. Speaker 6: Stolen email. Stolen drone. Stolen drone. Stolen election. Welcome to the world of unprecedented Trump. So do you believe President Trump is an illegitimate president. Speaker 2: Based on what I just said was I can't for Trump. Speaker 6: He tweeted in February 2018, quote, the more we learn about 2016 election, the more illegitimate it becomes. America deserves to know whether we have a fake president in the Oval Office. Speaker 3: And The rest in attempt to to have the election. And frankly, the FBI is weighing in on the election. I think make the make it makes this election illegitimate. Speaker 1: There was a widespread Understanding that this election was not on the level. We still don't know what really happened, Isaac. I mean, there's just a lot that I think will Be revealed, history will discover, but you don't win by 3,000,000 votes and have all this other shenanigans stuff going on and not come away with An idea like, woah, something's not right here. Speaker 5: Seems to me that there's a cloud of illegitimacy that continues to hang Over 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. Speaker 4: The outcome of the election was affected by their interference. And now we need to know, To what degree, if any, the Trump campaign was actually in collusion Speaker 1: with the Russia? He knows he's an illegitimate president. So of course, he's obsessed That's with me. And I believe that it's a guilty conscience. Speaker 2: We actually won the last presidential election, folks. They stole And Al Gore won that election. I think he won anyway. Actually, I think I carried Florida. Al Gore won the election nationwide Also in Florida, but the Supreme Court ruled the other way. Al Gore got more votes, but not enough to stay out of the Supreme Court where president Bush was elected five four. Speaker 1: Bush versus Gore. A court took away a presidency. Speaker 2: If all the votes were tallied in Florida, Adele Gold would be president today and George Bush would be back in office. Speaker 0: I come from Florida where you and others participated in what I call The United States coup d'etat. Speaker 6: In 2013, according to reports, vice president Joe Biden, he claimed that Al Gore was The one who was elected president. And he claimed that the recount result was, quote, a bad decision. Speaker 2: And never forget, dear friends, what they did in Florida to Al Gore and me, to all of us, to older Americans, to African Americans, to Haitian Americans Deny the right to vote and have those votes counted. Speaker 8: I do believe that projections were right in the 1st place at 7 o'clock when they called Speaker 1: it before. Let me tell you without a doubt. George Bush did not carry Florida and it was not closed. Speaker 2: There's no question that you won Oh, thank you, Charles. No. It's a question. Speaker 4: That's a question. Speaker 2: We will never know because The votes weren't weren't counted. But but and and then in your judgment I mean, that's unfortunate. And there is no other way of saying Let's be very blunt. Al Gore won the state of Florida in 2000, and we should never Forget it. Most Americans or great many Americans don't have confidence that the election of 2000 was fair. Speaker 8: But I don't believe we lost that. I believe we just failed to have all of the votes counted Speaker 4: The Supreme Court elected president. In 2004. Yeah. Al Gore won the state of Florida in 2000, although not the presidency. Speaker 3: We know we won this election. They know we won this election. And Americans know we won this election. Speaker 7: I know some people want you to believe that the Gore Campaign was a campaign that wasn't able to complete its mission. We did. Had all of Speaker 0: those votes been found in Florida, Speaker 8: I Speaker 7: think Al Gore would be president on today. Speaker 2: We had more votes. We won, and we are never going to let the United States Supreme Court choose the president of the United Takes the care. You should know by now based on the fact that he lost the popular vote by more than a half 1000000 voters, And we don't know how many he lost to buy in Florida. There's no doubt in my mind that Al Gore was elected president. Speaker 9: I rise to Object to the fraudulent 25 Florida electoral votes. Speaker 2: Really, we won the election in 2000, but they stole the election. I must object because of the overwhelming evidence of overwhelming evidence of official misconduct, deliberate fraud, and an attempt to The chairman has provided Imran had already Helped the Bush team with such favors as burying their rent a mob to Florida in 2000 to permanently halt of the counting of legally cast ballots. It is Speaker 7: signed by myself on behalf of my diverse constituents and the millions of Americans who have been disenfranchised by Florida's inaccurate vote counts to Supreme Court not to speak with Speaker 4: the United States despite of this election. Speaker 1: Speaking to a Democratic group in Chicago, he said he made it clear he thinks Al Gore was the winner. Speaker 2: The time it was over, our candidate won the popular vote. And the only way that could win the election was to stop the voting and fraud it. Catherine Harris, Jeb Bush, Jim Baker and the Supreme Court hadn't tampered with the results, l Gore would be. President? I think that the issue before us today, is not who won or should have won the 2000 presidential election. That issue has been settled not to my opinion, but it has been settled. Let's just drop the vice president president or not. Al Gore should have been president of the United States. Speaker 10: Al Gore, made it possible for George Bush to be The only appointed president in the history of these United States. Speaker 6: Democrats have won the past 3 presidential elections. In two Speaker 2: 1,000 unions turned out 25% of the vote and Al Gore won. But the Supreme Court hampered? That's a large The Supreme Court stopped the counting of votes, and if they've left the council on, Al Gore would've got the necessary votes. Speaker 0: The Supreme Court selected tent. George w Bush Speaker 2: as the president. He was not elected. There is overwhelming evidence that George w Bush did not win this Election. Speaker 3: What I observed, as a voter, as a citizen of Illinois, 4 years ago were troubling evidence of the fact that not every vote was being counted. Don't think that George w Bush won the election, in 2000 against our goal because I I think he he probably lost Florida and also the nationwide. Speaker 2: If you invite me back on this show Speaker 3: in about 8 weeks, I Speaker 2: think you're gonna learn that No, Roy. I think you get all the votes there. I felt what happened in Florida was a carefully worked out conspiracy. That many things could not go wrong in one state Without there having been a conspiracy, and many, many different things did go wrong. Many tricks were pulled of various kinds. Speaker 8: The vice president did win, but, And I do believe that the majority of voters that intended to to go to polls last year wanted to vote and cast their votes for Al Gore. I do believe that in in in terms of Florida as well. Speaker 2: The court has been supporting formation of the popular will. The most spectacular example being Bush versus Gore, where the majority by a five For a vote and joined the counting of more than a 100,000 ballots in Florida and essentially gave America its 1st court appointed president. A stolen citizen is naked and stolen. Even though Al Gore won the election, he won't take office. Speaker 11: That election was stolen from of the rightful winner. So, mister speaker, I'm here today to talk about a stolen presidential election. Speaker 2: I think in 2000, everybody Talk. Well, he did win the election out of the war. He started dividing America here in Florida By trying to take an election that I think any reasonable person would say he hadn't Actually, one. Speaker 0: What happened in Florida will go down in history As a coup d'etat. Speaker 2: Could we conclude, is it possible There was a conspiracy, and Florida officials were involved in the conspiracy. Never have so many things gone It's too wrong in one place before. Why how do all these things happen all at the same time in the same state? It is not as possible if there was a conspiracy that was very well organized. Why was the state police out there on that Today, election day, checking license plates and and so forth. You know, how did all these things happen in 1 state at one time in 1 election? Is is it possible that Use the word conspiracy and not be afraid of it. Speaker 1: I'm not sure wish Gore was president right now. He should be. Speaker 2: Well, yes, he got elected. Well done. A battle that by the will of the people should have ended in victory. But tens thousands of Florida votes either were not counted or tossed down in the 2000 presidential election. 5 supreme court justices. You've trumped the votes of 51,000,000 Americans. We should've let the entire state be reconned so it was clear, that Al Gore actually won the state of Florida. Speaker 0: And Al War won the election. Speaker 2: We had the election stolen from us. You must admit that. They stole it, And we need a leader to help us get revenge. Speaker 6: I voted for Al Gore. He won the election. Speaker 2: They usurped the the powers as far as being put in it and intervene. It was With the fix as far as we're concerned, you know, it's it's there's no polite way to talk about it except the fix was in. Speaker 0: After the election, when you stole Hold the election. You came back here and say, get over it. No. We're not gonna get over it. Speaker 2: You know it. I know it. They know it. We won that election. Speaker 12: Constantly shifting vote tallies in Ohio and malfunctioning electronic machines, which may not have paper receipts have led to additional loss of confidence by the public. Speaker 2: The right to vote has been stolen from qualified voters. The New Speaker 6: Yorker reported that Kerry thought that, quote, proxies for Bush had rigged many of the voting machines. Speaker 7: In 2004, the democratic process was thwarted. Speaker 2: To The 2004 presidential election in Ohio was riddled with unnecessary problems. Speaker 4: Some machines malfunctioned, causing votes to be counted more than once or not at all. Speaker 2: Based upon an inordinate number of allegations suggesting gross voting rights violations and misconduct, I joined with my colleagues and objective to counting the state of Ohio's electoral votes. As in 2000, the votes of many who wanted to vote were not, in fact, This Speaker 3: last Friday night, I I arranged to meet senator Kerry at a fundraiser to give him a copy of my book. He told me he now thinks the election was stolen. Speaker 1: The wife of John Kerry said she has lingering doubts about the legitimacy of the election. Her theory goes like this. 2 brothers, she calls hard right Republicans, Own 80% of voting machines in the US. Therefore, it would be easy to hack into the mother machines that control the electronic voting. Speaker 7: There were Numerous irregularities in Ohio, including large percentages of projections of provisional balloting, problems with voting machines. Speaker 1: As we look At our election system, I think it's fair to say that there are many legitimate questions about its accuracy, About its integrity. Speaker 12: There are still legitimate concerns over the integrity of our election. Speaker 3: The question obviously is How many instances were not caught that we don't know about? Number 1, we've seen a lot of, what I'll call, honest glitches where it just didn't work right, But also that these machines are hackable. A dishonest employee of the vendor or dishonest employee of the local board of elections or simply someone who knows electronics And as a computer at home, could hack into these machines and then put in the secret instructions to disregard every 20th Democratic voter had 10% to the carrier to the Bush vote or whatever. He might not even know it. Speaker 2: I agree with tens of millions of Americans Who are more very worried that when they cast the ballot on an electronic voting machine, that there There is no paper trail to record that vote. The numerous irregularities that occurred with the electronic voting machines In Ohio on November 2nd last year, point to an unresolved national crisis. Speaker 7: We cannot Clear that Speaker 3: the election of November 2, 2004 was free and clear and transparent and real. There must be independent testing of the voting machines used in Ohio. Speaker 1: I'm not confident that the election in Ohio was barely decided. We know that there was substantial voter suppression, and the machines were not reliable. Speaker 12: The members of Congress who have brought this challenge are speaking up for their agreed constituents, many of whom may have been disenfranchised in this process. Speaker 6: Treating today's electoral vote count in congress as a meaningless ritual would be an insult to our democracy unless we registered our own protest against the obviously fraud voting process that took place in so many Speaker 2: of our states. Voters who wish to cast a vote for president or vice president Can't approach the polls with certainty that their vote will be counted. One of the most significant problems in Ohio and in many other states Was a lack of measures to ensure the integrity of electronic voting machines. In 2004, they caused democratic voters in Ohio to wait for 8 hours before they could cast their ballot. They turned the department of civil rights and the justice department into the voter suppression division with Voter ID laws, voter purging, voter caging, voter intimidation. There aren't gonna be any more election stealing. Speaker 1: Now you have one very Speaker 6: We won. But I Speaker 1: didn't lose. I got the votes, but we won't know exactly how many because of how they cheat it. I did win my election. I just didn't get to have the job. We were robbed of an election. Without voter suppression, Stacey Abrams would be the governor of Georgia. Andrew Gillum is the governor of Florida. Using the Speaker 4: word rigged, using the word steal, do you think it's dangerous going into 2020? Speaker 1: I I don't because we can actually back it up. And so in response What I believe was stolen election. I'm not saying they stole it from me. They stole it from the voters' doors. That's when I was asked if I'm ever gonna concede. The answer is no. If she had a fair election, she already would have won. This is not a speech of concession. This is a step that needs to acknowledge an action that's right, true, or action is right, true or proper. And I will not concede because the erosion of our democracy is not You refuse to concede and say that you lost. Do you stand by that decision today? Absolutely. Speaker 2: If Stacey Abrams doesn't win in Georgia, they Stolen. It's clear. It's clear. Speaker 1: The only election It was not a free and fair I think the election was stolen from the people of Georgia. I believe it was stolen from the voters. Speaker 2: So I Speaker 3: think that Stacey Abrams' election is being stolen from her. Speaker 1: The election was not fair. The process was not fair. Thousands of Georgians had their voices stolen because they were not able to cast ballots. And they cannot be guaranteed that their votes will be counted in 2020 if we don't do this right. Speaker 4: If what happens to you happens nationally and we we see, whoever runs for whoever wins the Democratic nominee. If they say, actually, I can prove that there's a number of votes in every state that that and that's and that's the same thing that you just described happens in multiple states should they concede. Speaker 1: I do not think we should concede an election until we know the results of an election. I still fundamentally believed it could be fair. And that's just not how life works. If it looks like it's cheating, it probably is. If it looks like it's rigged, it probably is. Speaker 2: He would be the governor of Georgia today had the governor of Georgia not disenfranchised 1,400,000 Georgia voters before the election. That's what happened to Stacey Abrams. They took the votes away. Speaker 6: You, notably did not concede. I acknowledge. Okay. You acknowledge That he won, but you did not concede. Correct. 5 months later, do you still feel like your opponent won through voter suppression? Yes. Reminder, she wrote. Brian Kemp stole the gubernatorial election from Georgians and Stacey Abrams. Speaker 1: I said that the election stolen from Georgia voters, the process that took place during the legislative cycle was one that did not countenance and did not pay attention To the deep and real concerns of those who watch this election be stolen in the state of Georgia. It was stolen from the voters of Georgia. Georgia voters did not have their votes Counted. They were not allowed to cast votes. They had Speaker 2: their votes discarded. Certainly gave the appearance of unfairness. I think it was, unfair. Stacy ran a great campaign. Probably won. Speaker 1: And it was not fair to those who filled up absentee ballots. And depending on the county you sent it to, it Either it was counted or not counted, assuming you received it in time. Brian Kemp oversaw for 8 years the systematic and Systemic dismantling of our democracy, and that means there could not be free and fair elections in Georgia. As long as we have eligible American citizens who cannot cast a ballot, Then the game is rigged. I am complicit if I say that that system is fair. Concession in the political space is an acknowledgement that the process This is fair. And I don't believe that to be fair. But I refuse to concede because concession means that the process was proper, that the result was true and And right. And I cannot say that. If I tend to Speaker 0: say I didn't lose, I just didn't win. Speaker 12: And I don't call it a lot. Speaker 1: I just didn't win. Speaker 2: Yes. Yes. Officially. Yes. Officially. Speaker 1: Put it this way. I didn't get to get Inaugurated, next problem. Okay. But will I say that this election was not tainted, was not a disinvestment and a disenfranchisement of thousands of voters? I will not say that. Candidates votes, black and white, lost Their races because they have been deprived of the votes they otherwise would have gotten. And the clearest sample is from next door in Georgia. Stacey Abrams should be governor leading that state right now. I was joking with Beth backstage when she lost. I'm like, no, I just didn't win, because we don't know what really happened because of the miasma of voter suppression. I can't know for a fact that I would be the governor of Georgia, but for the He's in the management of Brian Kemp, but I know it's a pretty good guess. So I can't prove that I would have won, but I know we don't know because of how he behaved. Speaker 3: Is he the legitimate governor elect of Georgia? Speaker 1: He is the person who won an adequate number of votes from the governor. Speaker 2: With all with all due respect, and Speaker 3: I respect where you're coming from and I respect the the issues that you're raising. You're not answering the question. Do you think that Speaker 1: Wait a minute. I no. I what I talked to you Speaker 3: You're not using The word legitimate, is he the legitimate governor elect Georgia? Speaker 1: He is the legal governor of Georgia. He's not here to tell you that just because you win doesn't mean you're won. And you said to that you did not lose. You just did not win. Yes. So we're gonna talk about that. Bad news is that we didn't get the victory we secured. And the thing is we will never know empirically that I got more votes because we will never know which votes did make count. This was not fair. It was not right and it is deeply improper that someone could ascend to that role having performed So basically and so crassly against the very people he is now supposed to represent. The election was not fair. The process was not fair. So you don't feel that you lost fair and I do recognize I am not the governor of Georgia, but I do like to point out something that is true for me and for many in our state. And that is we won. Speaker 2: I'm not saying it's gonna be legit because the increase in the prospect of being illegitimate is a Direct proportions not being able to get these these reforms passed. Speaker 1: Right wing extremists already have a plan to literally seal the next presidential election. Speaker 13: It's not as if it's just Republicans who have monkeed around with elections in the past. Sometimes Democrats have to. Speaker 2: You Speaker 13: know, whenever people are in power, they're, you know, they have this tendency to try to, you know, tilt things in their direction.

@RealPunjabFiles — RealPunjabFiles

Posted - November 6, 2023 at 3:27 PM

Saved - November 6, 2023 at 3:52 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

In 1989, a peaceful Sikh procession in Jammu was attacked by Hindu fundamentalists of the Shiv Sena. Fourteen Sikhs were killed, Gurdwaras were destroyed, and hospitals were overwhelmed. The Punjab Human Rights Organization found that the attack was planned by the IB and executed by the Shiv Sena, with Karan Singh as a major financier. Despite arrests, no one of consequence was punished. The government failed to honor commitments for an impartial inquiry. The conspiracy against Sikhs by certain elements was evident.

@RealPunjabFiles - RealPunjabFiles

🧵 #PunjabFiles #NeverForget 1989 Massacre of Sikhs in Jammu by SHIV SENA A peaceful procession of Sikhs Was attacked by Hindu fundamentalists of the Shiv Sena of KARAN SINGH who was then made ambassador of India to the US. https://t.co/gLSthIOuaQ

@RealPunjabFiles - RealPunjabFiles

Fourteen Sikhs were killed, three Gurdwaras destroyed, the four hospitals in the city could not accommodate all the injured. The Punjab Human Rights Organization sent Mr. D’S. Gill, Mr MS. Jawanda aud Mr Jo ginder Singh to enquire. Their findings were shocking. https://t.co/VBl9gmCOya

@RealPunjabFiles - RealPunjabFiles

The attack was well planned and organized by the IB and executed by the Shiv Sena. Karan Singh was the patron and major financier of the Shiv Sena and Virat Hindu Samaj. For his anti SIkh efforts, he was given the plum foreign service post of US. ambassador. https://t.co/FpUgUGAilC

@RealPunjabFiles - RealPunjabFiles

The Criminal Investigation Department named 22 Shiv Sena activists for the Jammu violence. They were arrested but set free due to political pressure. Excerpts from the PHRO report.” No one of consequence was ever punished for the violence in Jammu. https://t.co/49rn9VLseM

@RealPunjabFiles - RealPunjabFiles

A few Gurdwaras in Purani Mandi were set on fire. Even the SMGS Hospital, the main hospital of the region, was not spared. A group of youths armed with Swords and other weapons attacked the people in the Hospital premises. https://t.co/UXQ5o6TbM8

@RealPunjabFiles - RealPunjabFiles

When most of the citizens alleged at the meeting that the “riots” were preplanned, the CM admitted the fact and promised to take action against the guilty officials for their lapses. Dr Abdullah said the Precisionists were not the aggressors as they had women and kids with them. https://t.co/Vmj0sSLC9W

@RealPunjabFiles - RealPunjabFiles

On January 14, Dr. Farooq Abdullah had said the State Government would write to the Chief Justice,to nominate a Judge preferably from the South to conduct the enquiry. But the govt did not honor the commitment. On January 21, a Cabinet meeting decided to appoint Mr. Ansari. https://t.co/sKasVgrsqU

@RealPunjabFiles - RealPunjabFiles

No communication was ever sent to the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. The Jammu Chambers of Commerce and the Yuva Shiv Sena announced that all markets would remain closed until the government released “innocent persons” unconditionally. https://t.co/nkcgZYCABB

@RealPunjabFiles - RealPunjabFiles

No action against the guilty officers was taken rather scape goats were being found for these incidents. Balraj Puri, a noted Hindu jour nalist said: I was present at the Control Room, when the officers telephoned thrice for contingent of police but no police were supplied.

@RealPunjabFiles - RealPunjabFiles

It appears that Centers’ conspiracy was working against the Sikhs. Tandon stated that in Jammu antisocial elements groups of Chaman Lal Gupta and Dr. Karan Singh are financed by the Chamber of Commerce under Jugal Mahajan/Ram Chand Mahajan also finance the Shiv Sena.

@KanekoaTheGreat — KanekoaTheGreat

Posted - November 10, 2023 at 7:17 PM

Saved - November 10, 2023 at 11:29 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

Evidence of voter fraud in Fulton County, Georgia during the 2020 election has emerged. Surveillance footage shows ballots being scanned multiple times, raising questions about the accuracy of the vote count. Audit tally sheets were found to be falsified, with fabricated vote totals. Testimony from election officials and witnesses further supports claims of irregularities, including pristine ballots and unsecured test ballots. Additionally, duplicate batches of mail-in ballots were discovered, resulting in thousands of fraudulent votes. Despite these concerns, efforts to inspect the ballots have been blocked. The article highlights the need for a forensic audit to ensure election integrity.

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

🚨THREAD: Tucker Carlson on Duplicated Ballots, Falsified Tally Sheets, and Mail-In Ballot Fraud in Fulton County, Georgia “It now appears there actually was meaningful voter fraud in Fulton County, Georgia, last November (2020). That is not a conspiracy theory. It’s true. Surveillance footage obtained by VoterGA shows large numbers of ballots being scanned multiple times. Pay attention to the women wearing yellow at the desk. According to VoterGA, she slides ballots into a scanning machine, removes the ballots, and then reinserts the same ballots. This happens multiple times. The question is, how many times were these ballots counted? Was each vote counted more than once? Fulton County won't answer that question. Now, one way to know that answer would be to check what are called audit tally sheets. Tellingly, for months after the 2020 election, Fulton County failed to provide more than 100,000 of those tally sheets, including 50,000 of them from mail-in ballots. When VoterGA finally forced Fulton County to turn over the tally sheets, the conclusion was stunning. Here's what the audit found. Seven falsified audit tally sheets containing fabricated vote totals... For example, a batch containing 59 actual ballot images for Joe Biden and 42 for Donald Trump was reported as 100 for Biden and 0 for Trump. The seven batches of ballot images with 554 votes for Joe Biden, 140 votes for Donald Trump, and 11 votes for Jo Jorgenson had tally sheets in the audit falsified to show 850 votes for Biden, 0 votes for Trump, and 0 votes for Jorgenson. Wait, did you just follow that? How is that not flat-out criminal fraud?"

Video Transcript AI Summary

In Fulton County, Georgia, a warehouse containing over 140,000 absentee ballots was broken into while deputies guarding the warehouse were absent. The motive behind the break-in remains unknown, but there are suspicions that it may be related to voter fraud allegations in the 2020 election. Fulton County officials have refused to allow public access to the ballots, but evidence suggests that at least 36 batches of mail-in ballots were double-counted, totaling over 4,000 votes. The Atlanta Journal Constitution also independently found hundreds of improperly duplicated ballots. Surveillance footage shows ballots being scanned multiple times, raising questions about the accuracy of the election results. The lack of transparency and potential fraud undermines trust in the democratic process.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: On a Saturday night in late May of this year, an alarm sounded in a big nondescript warehouse in Fulton County, Georgia. The warehouse was an unlikely place for a burglary. It was under round the clock surveillance by both private security and local law enforcement, including armed deputies with the Fulton County Sheriff's Office. Any unauthorized person entering from the outside would have to get past a locked 100 pound steel door as well as a maze of motion detectors. Not easy. But someone tried to do it anyway. And at just the perfect moment, 20 minutes after deputies in charge of guarding the warehouse left their posts. By the time those deputies returned to check out the alarm, someone had opened the 100 pound door to the warehouse. So what spent that night. And why? We still don't know. It's also not clear why the deputies left the warehouse or who took advantage of their absence. We do know that a lot of people might have had reason to try to get inside the warehouse. Depending on who you ask, the building contains evidence that either confirms or refutes the claim that voter fraud affected the outcome of the 2020 election in the state of Georgia. Georgia is a place that Joe Biden won by fewer than 13,000 votes. That warehouse holds more than a 140,000 absentee ballots. Now, what's interesting is that for reasons that are difficult to understand, Fulton County officials have refused to let the public see any of these ballots. An attorney called Bob Cheely has been pushing for transparency. He's filed suit for the right to see those ballots. He hasn't seen them all yet, but what he's found so far demands an explanation. All of us, no matter who you voted for, should wanna hear that explanation. You can't have a democracy if the public doesn't believe election results. Increasingly many people in this country don't believe them. The solution to that problem, and it's a significant problem, is not to scream at these people, called them lunatics or throw them in jail. The solution is to tell the truth about what happened. The only way to restore trust in our system is with facts. So what are the facts about the election in Fulton County, Georgia? Well, here's the official version. In May, the chairman of the and county board of commissioners, a man called Rob Pitts, explained that it was not necessary to look at the ballots. In fact, it was ridiculous even to ask to look at the ballots because there are already been plenty of recounts and all the recounts reach the same conclusion. Here's what Pitts said. And if it sounds familiar as you hear it, that's because so many other people in authority have been saying pretty much the same thing. Speaker 1: The elections in Fulton County, Georgia, they were open, they were fair, and they were transparent. The votes have been the elections have the election has been certified, so it's over. This will be the 4th one, and I can guarantee you that the results will be Of this one will be just like the results were for count 1, count 2, and count 3. No change. Again, our elections are open, fair, and transparent. Speaker 0: I can guarantee you. We already know what happened. Said we've counted those same ballots 4 times. The election's been certified. Stop already. And that's the argument that Fulton County has used in court to keep those ballots locked away in a warehouse. Except it's not true. It now appears there actually was meaningful voter fraud in Fulton County, Georgia last November. That is not a conspiracy theory. It's true. From the beginning, this show has tried to be fact based when we talk about the 2020 election results. So here's what we know tonight, factually. At least 36 batches of mail in ballots from the November election were double counted in Fulton County. That's a total of more than 4,000 votes. Those numbers come from a group called Voter GA, which along with Bob Chielly sued to get them. The final tally from the double counts we know about amounts to more than 33 100 votes for Joe Biden and 865 votes for Donald Trump. Now before you dismiss Bob Chielly and voter GA as dishonest partisan actors, keep in mind that the strongly left of center Atlanta Journal Constitution appears to agree with this, at least in outline. The newspaper reviewed the available digital ballot images independently And concluded that hundreds of ballots were improperly duplicated. What does that look like exactly? Well, here's what it looks like. At a press conference today, a consultant with voter GA called David Cross, showed how we can be certain that votes in Fulton County were counted more than once. Watch. Speaker 2: Identical mark next to it. You can see it's got the identical mark on the second one. And the ballot image is stored up here on the top left. So this one over is scanner 5162. That's scanner number 3. Fax number 235, image number 19. And And that matches 234 image 59. So you have the same ballot counted twice In the images and counted in the audit. How that's possible? I don't know. Speaker 0: How's that possible? I don't know. Every American should wanna know because the answer gets to the heart of the integrity of our elections, Houseions, otherwise known as our democracy. We're not talking about a couple of ballots here. We're talking about a lot of ballots. At least hundreds of ballots involved. Enough potentially to affect the outcome of the election. Here's another example. Speaker 2: Next ones. Alright? So same facts, number 234, image number 2, and 235, image number 61, Republican, Republican, Republican, Republican, all the way down to the point where this little spot up in Fannie Lewis matches this one over here. So question that that ballot was counted twice. Speaker 0: So what's the explanation for this? Well, if you ask Fulton County, these happens these ones you just saw on the screen were isolated incidents. Just a handful of bad ballots happens all the time. The county claims that any errors were caught in previous recounts. The problem is that neither one of those claims is true. Surveillance footage obtained by voter GA appears to show large numbers of ballots being scanned multiple times. Pay attention to the tape we're showing you to the woman wearing yellow at the desk. According to voter GA, she slides ballots into a scanning machine, removes the ballots and then reinserts the same ballots. This happens multiple times. The question is, how many times were those ballots counted. Was each vote counted more than once? Fulton County won't answer that question. Now one way to know the answer would be to check what are called audit tally sheets, tellingly for months after the presidential election, Fulton County failed to provide more than a 100,000 of those tally sheets, including 50,000 of them for mail in ballots. When voter GA finally forced Fulton County to turn over the tally sheets, the conclusion was stunning. Here's what the audit found. Quote, 7 falsified audit tally sheets containing fabricated vote totals. For example, a batch containing 59 actual ballot images for Joe Biden in 42 for Donald Trump was reported as a 100 for Biden and 0 for Trump. The 7 batches of ballot images with 500 and before votes for Joe Biden, 140 votes for Donald Trump, and 11 votes for Joe Jorgensen had tally sheets in the audit applied to show 850 votes for Biden, 0 votes for Trump, and 0 votes for Jorgensen. Wait. Did you just follow that? How is that not flat out criminal fraud? We'd love to know because it certainly sounds like flat out criminal fraud. We've obtained photographs showing what went on during the recount process for mail in ballots in Fulton County. These pictures were taken by a whistleblower made it in the recount. She said she noticed something odd as she did. None of the ballots that she saw had any creases on them. You can see the stacks of unfolded ballots on your screen now. That's strange because of course mail in ballots need to be bent in order to be mailed in. These ballots clearly had never been inside an envelope. And then there was a blower notice something else. All of the ballots there was a blower tells us have been filled out by a printer, not by hand. And many of them supported the exact same candidates, democrats, including Joe Biden. The warehouse, voter g a detected a series of other apparent irregularities in the recount. The group's audit found, for example, that quote, over 200 Fulton County mail in ballot images contained votes that were not included in the hand count audit results for the November election. Now why is that? We don't know. Keep in mind, once again, the results in the state of Georgia were decided by fewer than 13,000 votes. It was a close race. Every vote mattered. And then there's this, an elections expert called Mark Davis analyzed data from the post office. He found that nearly 35,000 Georgia voters moved out of their county of residence more than a month prior to election shouldn't day. They were ineligible to vote, and yet they did. They still voted in their old county. That is illegal. It's not a small thing. Violating election law is something we should care about. And by law, their votes should have been excluded from the total, but they were not excluded. Why are we okay with that? Why are we k with any of this. We're okay with it because we've been told we have to be okay with it. We're undermining democracy if we ask questions about what happened during the 2020 election. And of course, that's a perfect inversion of the truth. Without answers to legitimate questions like the ones we just posed, and those are legitimate questions, democracy dies. People begin to understand that the system they've been told is on the level is in fact rigged. And when they believe that, God knows what they do next. So let's find out what actually happened. Let's find out immediately. Let's find out without shame. It's our right to know. It's our responsibility to know.

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

GEORGIA🚨 20-year Fulton County Election Official Susan Voyles Says Test Ballots Counted In Georgia "This is the part that I am just so sure of. I think that some of the TEST BALLOTS from prior to the election made their way into these batches." "These are so clean, these are pristine. These are almost immaculate... I could tell that these had been printed... 107 of them all had this little eclipse for Biden... Every vote on every ballot, both sides, even soil and conservation, was exactly the same." "These were the cleanest ballots I have ever in my life seen... And then the paper felt different. There was just such an anomaly to these ballots." It doesn't take a rocket scientist to realize that these 145,000 ballots in Fulton County need to be forensically audited. Yet election integrity advocates like @VoterGa have been fighting in court for three years to inspect these "pristine" ballots on "different paper" with "no folds, or creases" and "perfect bubbles" that were "all for Biden." Especially considering New York City "accidentally" counted 135,000 test ballots in a June 2021 Mayoral election. Furthermore, there are NINE witness affidavits in Fulton County testifying to stacks of unusual mail-in ballots with "pristine sheets, no creases, and perfect bubbles" that went "all for Biden".

Video Transcript AI Summary

The speaker, who has experience with ballots, describes their observation of pristine and clean ballots. They noticed a slight eclipse on the bubble for Joseph R. Biden, which appeared on 107 out of 110 ballots. Every vote on every ballot, including referendums, was exactly the same, which the speaker finds statistically impossible. They believe these were preprinted ballots and suspect that some test ballots from before the election were mixed in. Out of 800 ballots, less than 40 were for Trump and 7 for Jorgensen. The speaker emphasizes the unusual cleanliness of the ballots, as there were no creases or signs of wear. They question how these ballots were not folded and express disbelief at the anomaly.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: I've done this for a long time. I've seen ballots. I've seen, I I've touched ballots. I've felt ballots. The first thing that struck me though wasn't the way the ballot was marked, it was how clean these ballots were. And that's where the word pristine came from because I. That was the only word that came to mind. I said: These are so clean, these are pristine. And I was running my hand over them and I said to my partner Barbara, I said: Barbara, Look at these. These, these are almost immaculate. And then I noticed on the bubble that was for Joseph R. Biden, There was a slight eclipse but I could tell these had been printed. And then as we went through this batch of a 110, which should have only been a 100, a 107 of them all had this little eclipse for Biden. The next thing I saw was I started glancing down the ballot and every vote on every ballot, Both sides, even soil and conservation, was exactly the same. Speaker 1: What about the referendums? Speaker 0: They were exactly the same. Speaker 1: What are the chances of that? Speaker 0: I'd say that's a statistical impossibility. I've done this forever, and most people forget something on a ballot. Speaker 1: And they all voted for the same thing? They did. Biden, Ossoff, Warnock, soil and water amendments, it was all the same. Speaker 0: Everything was the same and they were obviously pre printed. They tried to tell me the things that they were, but I knew that they weren't that. They couldn't have been adjudicated ballots. These were preprinted ballots. This is the part that I just am so sure of. I think some of the test ballots from prior to the election made their way into some of these batches. There were 800 in this box. Out of all those, there were less than 40 for Trump and 7 for Jorgensen. And as long as I've been doing this, I have never seen odds like Speaker 1: So what's that? Somebody somebody do the math. 96%. 90, 95% for Biden. I mean, that's that's unheard of. Plus, so on. Water's the same. Amendments are the same. Down ballots the same. Council mayor, whatever the referendums. This is a look. This is a statistical impossibility. Right? So you saw that and what about the other thing? They weren't folded. Speaker 0: Correct. Speaker 1: No crease. Speaker 0: As I ran my hand over these, there was no wear on them. Even when the ballot is sitting on your kitchen table, Soil from your hands gets on there. Soil from somebody else's hands when they're opening the ballot gets on there. These were the cleanest ballots I have ever in my life seen. Speaker 1: And if you got to deliver them back in an envelope, Susie, and that's the law, they have to be in an envelope. Envelope has to be sealed And you sign across the seal. Are these magic ballots? Did somebody steam clean them? How are they not folded? Speaker 0: That was the first thing that drew my attention was the fact that they were so and then the paper felt different. There I there was just such an anomaly to these ballots. Speaker 1: Unbelievable.

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

GEORGIA🚨 Here are a few affidavits filed shortly after the election attesting to the *counterfeit* ballots in Fulton County. GA Democrat: "Hundreds of these ballots seemed impeccable, no folds or creases. The bubble selections were perfectly made... only black ink, and all.. for Biden." GA Democrat: "All had a perfect black bubble and were all Biden... I heard... Biden.. over 500 times in a row." Susan Voyles, 20-year election official: "Pristine" sheets "difference in the texture of the paper" with "a different feel" and "no markings" and approximately "98% for Joe Biden." Our election system is so corrupt that @VoterGa has been fighting in court for three years for the right to inspect these ballots from the 2020 election.

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

GEORGIA🚨 Fulton County poll worker Bridget Thorne says thousands of *test ballots* were printed on the same "heavy cardstock" used for actual ballots and left unsecured with no chain of custody. The *test ballots* were "indistinguishable from live Georgia ballots," and stacks were left "unsecured all over the facility." "It's the same roll-in voter paper. There were reams of it all over the warehouse. Anybody could print. You could print whatever ballots you wanted. Not only test ballots." There are nine witness affidavits testifying to stacks of unusual mail-in ballots with "pristine sheets, no creases, and perfect bubbles" that went "all for Biden." Many election workers who signed these affidavits believe these "pristine sheets" were test ballots, yet no one has been allowed to inspect them for three years.

Video Transcript AI Summary

Bridget Thorne, a voting technician in Fulton County, Georgia, raised concerns about the handling of test ballots during the election. She stated that the test ballots were printed on the same paper as real ballots, making them indistinguishable. Thorne also expressed uncertainty about the chain of custody for these ballots. She mentioned an incident where a consultant from the elections group was printing random ballots, and she corrected him on the process. Thorne also mentioned her concern about the presence of ACLU clerks with access to the voter database. Additionally, she highlighted the haphazard treatment of early voting ballots at the warehouse. Thorne filed an affidavit and shared her concerns with the Secretary of State.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Our next guest is a Fulton County, Georgia voting technician and says test ballots were handled in an unsecure manner and un indistinguishable from live ballots. Here with more is Bridget Thorne. Bridget, good morning to you. Speaker 1: Good morning. Speaker 0: Okay, so Bridget, what were you hired to do on Election Day? Speaker 1: I was trained as a poll tech, and I was hired to come down to the warehouse to help. The 24 employees that normally work the warehouse, were quarantined with COVID. So they had Dominion Software running the warehouse. Speaker 0: Okay. So one of the things that I read your affidavit. It's about 3 pages long. It's very interesting stuff. One of the things that concern you is, with each of the machines, you're supposed to run sample ballots. Test ballots, that is to say. You think they should have been run on just regular paper, but instead, they were run with the heavier cardstock that people normally vote on. So you're worried that a sample ballot, a test ballot, is indistinguishable from a real live ballot? Speaker 1: Correct, correct. They are. And it's the same roll in voter paper. There are rings of it all over the warehouse. Anybody could print. You could print whatever ballots you wanted, not only test ballots. Speaker 0: Yeah. So so all these ballots, and I think there were over a dozen per machine, We're printed. And then what happened to them? Speaker 1: I don't know. I assume there was a big suitcase in the middle of the warehouse that you could put stuff in to go to the Yeah. I since anyone had access to that, I would spoil a ballot before I put it in the shredder, but nobody else was directed To do anything about that. Like, we can't let these ballots get in the wrong hands. Speaker 0: And when you say spoil a ballot, you you would run something through a QR code in the corner so that it was unusable or else you'd rip it apart. And you did thousands of those so that they could not be used, or, you know, as a real ballot. And that's one of the things that concerns you. You don't know exactly the chain of custody. You don't know what happened to those ballots. Speaker 1: Correct. Correct. Speaker 0: Tell us also a little bit about, apparently there was a guy who was working there by the name of Mike. And you had some problems with the way Mike was operating. Speaker 1: So the last night I was there, we were done printing test ballots, but they lost. They would lose these test ballots. So we have to reprint them. And it was a very disorganized process. And And I decided to go out on the floor and leave the test ballot station. So there was nobody at the test ballot area or tables. And when I came back late at night, 10 o'clock at night thinking I need to get my purse, I'm gonna go home. There was a Dominion employee and a consultant from the elections group from Chicago who'd been there pretty much all week, but Stayed in the back of the warehouse. And he was, I assumed they need a test ballot, so I just sat down. How can I help? The Dominion employee soon left. I noticed the consultant was just printing random ballots. And so I corrected him. I'm like, let me give you a lesson. This is how you print test ballots. And so I taught him and then he's like, do I have to vote for Trump? And I'm like, yeah, you have to vote for Trump. And then he shortly left. And I later find out, I I thought he was a warehouse consultant. I have a background with some industrial engineering, my daughter, my husband, everybody's industrial engineers. So I was talking to him about Georgia Tech and how great it would be to get students to come down here and help. And He never corrected me that he wasn't a warehouse engineer. The elections group has nothing to do with warehousing. Speaker 0: So with all those tests and sample ballots, you just don't know what happened to them. And so you have a question. Was one other thing in your affidavit that was interesting, and that was, I think it was the day of the election. You received an email that said there would be ACLU clerks for absentee ballots in each precinct. Why were you troubled by the fact that there would be somebody from the ACLU there? Speaker 1: Well, I received an email on Sunday in preparation to be a precinct manager. And my immediate concern was that it was a partisan group that was having access to the voter database. Being a computer person, Having that database information as to who applied for an absentee ballot, who turned theirs in, who didn't turn theirs in, and you're giving it access to that database to a group was Kind of a concern for me, but I didn't know. So I contacted the Secretary of State's office and just put in my concern. And I thought, that's good. But the day of the election, my ACLU clerk was able to just use her personal laptop and she wasn't trained to collect an affidavit, which is the most important thing When clearing a veteran vote on the machines. Speaker 0: So you have come forward because you have seen these irregularities, and you don't know exactly what happened to the sample ballots. You don't know exactly what Mike Steele was. You don't know exactly what the ACLU involvement was, but you just were concerned given all of these allegations. Speaker 1: Yes, and then a big concern was the handling of the early voting ballots, The real ballots that people voted on in State Farm Arena, when they came into the warehouse, they were just haphazardly treated by anybody who wanted to dump the ballots out of the scanner tabulators. Speaker 0: And And Speaker 1: there was no oaths administered. There weren't 2 people present. People were just dumping them in suitcases and then leaving the suitcases on the floor and taking a break for dinner or just quitting the job. And I know how precious a ballot is in someone's vote. Speaker 0: And it Speaker 1: was very disturbing for me to see that. Speaker 0: Right, exactly. And that's why you filed this affidavit and you talked to the Secretary of State as well. Bridget Thorne, thank you very much for telling us your story and what you saw. Speaker 1: Thank you.

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

GEORGIA🚨 Fulton County falsified 7 audit tally sheets containing fabricated vote totals for their respective batches of ballot images. For example, a batch containing 59 actual ballot images for Joe Biden, 42 for Donald Trump, and 0 for Jo Jorgenson was reported as 100 for Biden and 0 for Trump. The seven batches of ballot images with 554 votes for Joe Biden, 140 for Donald Trump, and 11 for Jo Jorgenson had tally sheets falsified to show 850 for Biden, 0 for Trump, and 0 for Jorgenson. The VoterGA team also found at least 36 duplicate batches of mail-in ballots, resulting in 4,255 total extra votes. These fraudulent votes include 3,390 extra votes for Joe Biden, 865 extra votes for Donald Trump, and 43 extra votes for Jo Jorgenson. @TalkMullins @VoterGa

Video Transcript AI Summary

The speaker discusses tally sheets from the Georgia audit, noting that some sheets show fraudulent numbers, such as 100 to nothing or 150 to nothing. They mention that the sheets are signed by the auditors, but the person responsible for the fraud remains unknown. The speaker then shifts focus to the ballot images obtained through a lawsuit, pointing out that there are duplicate markings on different ballots. They mention that over 4,000 duplicate reports were found, with an error rate of 59.7% according to a spreadsheet with 40,000 line items comparing original election numbers to the recount.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Yeah. So what we're looking at, Heather and Steve, are tally sheets that were the auditors for the Georgia audit that was conducted on November 14th 15th in Fulton County. They fill these out as they counted the balance. And typically, you would see 37 to 43, 60 to 1 to 48, something like that. But here we have tally sheets that are 100 to nothing for ballots. So somebody filled this out. But it's not just one of these. We have a 7 of these and we're going to kind of scroll through and show you these live. There's another one, 100 to nothing. The actual counts of these are like 59, 42 in terms of ballot images. Here's one that's 150 to nothing. Speaker 1: Yeah. So basically, every the people that were Filling, doing the audit would count the batches and then write in fraudulent numbers because they have the corresponding images for these Hatches and they do not match these sheets. So whoever was doing them commit fraud. And what I had asked him in the press conferences, are these Sheets signed by the person that doing them. And apparently, they are Steve. And not only that, the secretary of state has the information. These sheets that they got, it's redacted. So they can't determine who was doing this, but we know that whoever did commit fraud. Now I wanna switch over to the images of the ballots. Right. These ballot images that they obtained through their lawsuit that are the official images from the Dominion machines, 2 different ballots right here, right? This is the ballot number, the batch or the ballot number here, different from here. But as you can see, it's the exact Same markings, Steve, on each one. And Garland, tell me, how many of these did you guys find? Speaker 0: Well, there are a total the there are total duplicate reporting of over 4,000. We're still looking at as to find out how many of these are duplicate scanned. Speaker 1: This spreadsheet behind here has about 40,000 line items, right, that compares the numbers from the original election to the recount. The error rate on that they said was 59.5%. Let that sink in. Speaker 0: Yeah. Actually, 59.7 to be exact.

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

GEORGIA🚨 Fulton County election officials told the media and observers that they were shutting down the tabulation center at State Farm Arena at 10:30 pm on election night only to continue counting ballots until 1:00 am. Video footage shows everyone was cleared out, including observers, but a handful of election workers stayed behind, pulled ballots out from under a table, and continued to scan ballots until 1:00 am. This included scanning the same sets of ballots multiple times in a row. SOS Brad Raffensperger hired a private contractor to monitor the Fulton County election. His notes obtained by @JustTheNews reveal that Raffensperger "ripped" Fulton County at 11:17 pm, saying, "Fulton can't get anything right," after the media reported that State Farm Arena had stopped counting for the night. His notes continue: 11:26 — There is confusion about whether or not they're still scanning at State Farm bc there were reports that the staff there told the rest of the staff and press to leave, but I am still getting number reports from Shaye ~11:30 — Amid reports from local news that the lights are off and the staff have left, I head to state farm 11:52 — I arrive at State Farm Arena and report to Ryan Germany and Deputy Secretary Jordan Fuchs that they staff are still scanning on all five scanners. "The media just packed up when I released all the staff opening and sorting ballots," Shaye told me. The scanners worked to clear what had been processed that day instead of interrupting the processing flow to secure the ballots before leaving. Their goal is to hit Ralph's 100k by the end of the night. 12:08 — I send Ryan insert photo timestamped image showing that scanners are still working so that he can refute stories to the contrary. Order is starting to break down ---> Ralph newly re-scanned some ballots that had already been processed by Shaye 12:15 AM — Inspector James Callaway arrives to investigate the accusations that the Fulton staff had told the press to go home and were scanning without observers. If the private contractor is saying "order is starting to break down" at 12:08 due to some "already been processed" ballots being "re-scanned," why does the arena footage show the very same election workers repeatedly re-scanning the same batches of ballots multiple times in a row before the private contractor arrives? Lastly, Fulton County released ballot images, and guess what? Fulton County counted the same ballots multiple times.

Video Transcript AI Summary

There was no water main break. A toilet leaked earlier but had no impact on the election. The water main break was used as an excuse to clear the room. The vote count was supposed to resume the next morning, but it was discovered that 5 women had been scanning ballots for 2 and a half hours the previous night. One woman repeatedly ran the same stack of ballots through the scanner. Another woman did the same on her desk. This video evidence shows that the principle of one person, one vote was disregarded. It's like having a video of someone running a red light, no need for expert testimony.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: There was no water main break at all. There was a toilet leak about 16 or 18 hours earlier in the day leaking from the ceiling from a suite above. It was cleaned up. It had no impact on this election. The water main break, pronouncement was obviously made to to clear the room of all poll watchers and the media. So they were told that night that, the vote count would be suspended because the water main break and that they would resume the vote count the next morning. The next morning, everybody was stunned to learn that the people at, State Farm arena, there were 5 women that worked for about 2 and a half hours from, just before 11 PM until just before 1 AM, scanning ballots. And the disturbing thing about it is that, there were 5 of these desks with women, at each of the 5 desks, and we've labeled the first one here kind of focused on her. She's wearing a purple top, desk 1. This is at 4 x speed, so we don't have to sit there what's, you know, in a slower speed. But you can see that this lady is, taking the same stack of ballots, And once she runs them through the scanner, there she goes. She sticks them back in and runs them a 2nd time and a 3rd time. And then the lady to her right wearing the yellow top. We we've got a 2nd video that shows that she did the same thing with stack of ballots on her desk. And, so there's ballot scan number 3 from desk number 1. 1 man, 1 vote just went out the window at State Farm Arena on the night of November 3, 2020, and it's here for all us to see. This is this is much like going to trial with a who ran the red light case, and instead of having people coming in and testifying about who ran the red light, you got a video showing who ran the red light. Now it doesn't take experts, you know

Video Transcript AI Summary

In this video, the speaker shows two different batches of votes, both from scanner 5162. They point out that there are similarities between the ballots in each batch, such as a little tail and the word "Republican" written on them. The speaker mentions that there are a total of 62 images in the batch, but they only highlight a few obvious examples. They also mention that the total numbers of the batches were fairly close. The speaker concludes that these similarities indicate duplicate ballots, suggesting that the entire batch was scanned multiple times.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Alright. So what we're looking at here are, are 2 different batches of votes. Scanner 5162, batch two thirty four, image 59. And scanner 5162, batch 2 35, image teen. And what you can see is that, like on this vote right here, we've got this exact same little tail that shows on both of them. And if you don't and if you think that maybe that's, you know, if you think that maybe that's just a, you know, a mistake or you know, or just a coincidence. Here's the next one that shows you can see Republican is written there. Republicans written there. This is, Ballot 61. This is ballot number 2. And then, each one of them even has this little dot in the Fannie Willis. Speaker 1: Okay. Do you have more of those? Speaker 0: We have the entire batch. I've got there's 62 images in here total. And I didn't even get a chance to go through all of them. But these are the most obvious ones, where it's clear that it's it's the same. This one's got the little tail on the side. Speaker 1: And so what happened so do you know the numbers of these total batches? Like Speaker 0: I don't remember what the what the totals were when the batches I don't think they were they weren't disparate. They we're fairly close, but the the simple fact that they occurred. Speaker 1: See that little bubble right there. This is a one image. Here's Another image? Exactly. See, the exact same in the batch number? Was it five 162. Speaker 0: Also, scanner 5162. Okay. Scatter. Batch number 235, image number 92, matches the same scanner 5162. Batch 234. Image 33. Speaker 1: So there you have it. Duplicate ballots. The entire batch is scanned several times.

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

GEORGIA🚨 CNN on Election Night 2020: "This is really fascinating. Again, all of the counties that we are looking at here are democratic strongholds all around the Atlanta area. Here is where it gets really bizarre... Fulton County, the most populous county... It is Atlanta. They just stopped counting at 10:30 pm... They stopped counting their absentee ballots. They said they would pick it up in the morning." P.S. They actually kept counting. Biden also received 98% of a 23,487 vote batch at 12:18 am. According to Georgia's official 2020 election data, Biden received 83% of the vote in Dekalb and 73% in Fulton County. So it's incredibly odd for Biden to get 98% of a vote batch. Although there are numerous witness affidavits testifying to stacks of unusual mail-in ballots with "pristine sheets, no creases, and perfect bubbles" that went "all for Biden." Unfortunately, nobody can inspect those 145,000 ballots in Fulton County, Georgia, despite Joe Biden only winning the state by 11,800 votes.

Video Transcript AI Summary

In this video, the speaker discusses the interesting situation in Fulton County, which is a Democratic stronghold in Atlanta. They mention that the county stopped counting their absentee ballots at 10:30 PM and will resume in the morning. It is estimated that there are at least 48,000 ballots yet to be counted. These outstanding areas around Atlanta are known for their Democratic support, and it is concerning that a significant number of absentee mail-in ballots are missing.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: This is really fascinating. Again, all of the counties that we're looking at here, Democratic stronghold, Phil mentioned it, all around the Atlanta area. Here's where it gets really bizarre, at Fulton County, most populous county, it is Atlanta, they just stopped counting at 10:30 PM. They stopped counting their absentee ballots, they said they'd pick it up in the morning, we believe there is a minimum of 48,000 ballots there. These are all areas, these are all outstanding areas here around the Atlanta Standing areas here around the Atlanta area that have democratic strongholds. K. They're democratic strongholds and they are missing a huge chunk of their absentee mail in ballots.

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

GEORGIA🚨 @CannConActual rips Georgia's fraudulent 2020 election. "I don't think you guys understand how much stuff is missing in Georgia." -The in-person voter election day ballot images -The hash files to validate ballot images -The drop box custody forms -They duplicated forms for missing days -Nobody signed 80%-90% of the poll tapes -Chain of custody documentation

Video Transcript AI Summary

The speaker discusses issues with the election in Georgia, specifically mentioning missing ballot images and hash validation files. They criticize the hand count process and mention duplicated Dropbox custody forms. They also highlight that poll tapes were not signed by witnesses. The speaker expresses frustration with the report from the cyber and security infrastructure agency and the sealing of the Halderman report. They mention the need for rigorous post-election audits and criticize the lack of risk limiting audits in the 2022 elections.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: You know, I've been working a ton in Georgia, Michigan, Arizona, but mainly lately in Georgia. If if you I don't think you guys, any of you guys understand how much shit is missing in Georgia. The machine count, the 1st machine count, the election day ballots that they scanned that people voted in person, we don't have those ballot images. We, the only images we have from Georgia, from Fulton County is the 2nd machine count images. Now, coincidentally, the Dominion Voting Machines, they, they create every time a ballot image is created on these ICX machines, they also create a hash validation file. So you can ensure that when you look at that ballot image, you can take that hash validation file and ensure that that ballot image has not been tampered with. Those are gone too. I mean it's just an absolute shit show and then they say, well we did 3 counts. We did a machine count, a hand count and a machine count. Well the hand count in, in Curling v Raffensperger, Philip Stark, who is no friend of the right, he's no friend of the right, came out and flat out said that you can't do a hand count on this because you can't, counting crap, you're auditing, you're doing a risk limit on crap, you're counting crap, you don't know that these ballots line up. It's just absolutely disgusting how much they got away with. We literally have shown them Dropbox custody forms. This is related to 2,000 mules. Dropbox chain of custody forms that are duplicated, they took a copy, scanned it and said this is this day and this day. The same exact document. They even tried to cancel it out and change the numbers and they decided not to and they went back. We have poll tapes like an overwhelming majority. We're talking like 80, 90 the poll tapes, nobody signed them. Nobody signed them as witnesses. None of the poll managers, the poll workers, nobody signed the tape, that is a document, that is a chain of custody document and they wouldn't put their names on. Did anybody ask them why? Did anybody ask any of these poll workers why they wouldn't put their names on it? It's just, it's so insane. And then we get this report from, SISO, the cyber and security infrastructure, whatever it is, agency, you know, Chris Krebs and safest election ever, that bullshit that he fed us early on, we get a letter from them after the Halderman report, which is still sealed by the way, because you know, that's the appropriate thing to do is when the election systems that we paid for, United States citizens paid for the whole entire free world, when an expert comes out that they touted as a hero in Antrim County for figuring out what happened in Antrim County, he's touted as a hero. He puts this report out and the federal judge immediately seals it and now the, now SISA comes out and says, we read it. It's pretty bad. You need to do rigorous post election audits, you know, all this stuff. So what happens in 2022? Brad Raffensperger and Brian Kemp outperform polls by over 20% 20% to win reelection in Georgia, are there any risk limiting audits? No. No. No.

@RealPunjabFiles — RealPunjabFiles

Posted - November 11, 2023 at 4:01 AM

Saved - November 11, 2023 at 6:31 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

In the #PunjabFiles controversy, some accounts are dismissing the truth by relying on biased newspaper cuttings. They ignore the PHRO and NHRC reports that contradict their narrative. Eyewitnesses reveal that the shooters were accompanied by a turbaned man and two clean-shaven men. The motive behind these killings was political, aiming to impose presidential rule in Punjab and benefit the Congress party. These clandestine tactics aimed to destabilize law and order and force central government intervention. The media and Shiv-Sena played a role in promoting this narrative. Additionally, temples were targeted to create communal tension. Reports of human rights violations in Punjab shed light on these incidents.

@RealPunjabFiles - RealPunjabFiles

🧵 #PunjabFiles The TRUTH Another lie by these propaganda accounts basing the whole story on a newspaper cutting of newspapers like Punjab Kesari, who were vocally Anti-Sikh at the time. They chose to ignore the PHRO and NHRC reports because it doesnt serve their purpose. https://t.co/WKDqSP5QLk

@RealPunjabFiles - RealPunjabFiles

After the 28 March incident, the committee interviewed Jagdish Singh, the Munshi who was involved in the shooting. As per Police version, three of the "terrorists" came from POLICE STATION No. 4 and vanished into either City Police office or Sadar Police station. 😮 https://t.co/O3ocSVcS9g

@RealPunjabFiles - RealPunjabFiles

The Committee traced the route taken by shooters; they moved from Dresi Ground, Old Mandi, GT road and then killing one in Arya School. However, there was a permanent post of CRPF in that very school. They only came out when people banged their door, not during shooting (Hmm..) https://t.co/Ka5A3RJmnc

@RealPunjabFiles - RealPunjabFiles

Most of the eyewitnesses chose not to say anything. The ones who did, told police and committee that the scooter was being driven by one Turbaned man with 2 CLEAN SHAVEN men in the back who were shooters.

@RealPunjabFiles - RealPunjabFiles

At the time, Surjit Singh Barnala was the CM of Punjab from Akali Dal who were political partners with BJP. The main motive behind these killings was found to be political so that the presidential rule can be imposed in Punjab which would give power to Congress in Centre. https://t.co/gASbjIwaU1

@RealPunjabFiles - RealPunjabFiles

The aim was to blackmail the administration, create conditions to immobilize law and order and force central govt to intervene and thus avenge the political defeat. The whole media and Shiv-Sena was pushing this very same Narrative.

@RealPunjabFiles - RealPunjabFiles

These were clandestine tactics played by two factions of erstwhile ruling party. Even the temples were not spared at this time and tail and ears of dead cows were thrown by overt and covert means to create a permanent wedge between two communities to serve political purpose. https://t.co/eOw7Oo0tQ4

@RealPunjabFiles - RealPunjabFiles

Excerpts from: Reports of Human right Violations in Punjab (PHRO, NHRC)

@BishopPOEvang — Bishop (LP) 𝕏

Posted - November 11, 2023 at 10:43 AM

Saved - November 11, 2023 at 10:28 PM

@BishopPOEvang - Bishop (LP) 𝕏

Gov Poll: Kogi Residents Protest As INEC Officials Arrive Polling Units With Pre-recorded Result Sheets https://t.co/oDnsE4h0Y7

Video Transcript AI Summary

Protesters are currently demonstrating in Magongo, as shown in the live footage. The location is the rap center, which is significant for the upcoming state election scheduled for November 11, 2023.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: They are protesting. You can see what's happening. You can see what's happening. This is happening live in Magongo. This is the rap center in Magongo. Government for this state. The election taking place on 11th of 11 2023. This is happening live.

@jacksonpbn — Jackson Ude

Posted - November 11, 2023 at 10:53 AM

Saved - November 11, 2023 at 10:28 PM

@jacksonpbn - Jackson Ude

In Ogori Magongo Local Government, Kogi State, result sheets already have recorded votes even before commencement of accreditation. Miracle indeed, no dey tire Yahaya Bello. https://t.co/xLtITVxvDC

@JeffreyGuterman — Dr. Jeffrey Guterman

Posted - November 12, 2023 at 6:57 AM

Saved - November 13, 2023 at 1:24 PM

@JeffreyGuterman - Dr. Jeffrey Guterman

A Labour Party representative is severely beaten and dragged out of the coalition centre in Imo State. https://t.co/NLYEeqMOVg

@LeadingReport — Leading Report

Posted - November 16, 2023 at 5:19 PM

Saved - November 16, 2023 at 5:23 PM

@LeadingReport - Leading Report

BREAKING: Audit the Vote PA has released a video showing 350,000 in-person votes being removed from the Republican Supreme Court candidate in Pennsylvania with no explanation, leading to the candidate losing by 200k votes. https://t.co/y6Cna43i5y

@JDunlap1974 — 🇺🇸🇺🇸Josh Dunlap🇺🇲🇺🇲 ULTRA-MAGA

Posted - November 16, 2023 at 6:29 PM

Saved - November 30, 2023 at 6:21 AM

@JDunlap1974 - 🇺🇸🇺🇸Josh Dunlap🇺🇲🇺🇲 ULTRA-MAGA

🚨 ALERT 🚨🚨 BREAKING: Audit the Vote PA has released a video showing 350,000 in-person votes being removed from the Republican Supreme Court candidate in Pennsylvania with no explanation, leading to the candidate losing by 200k votes. 🚨🚨 https://t.co/t6t6iDweWY

@ashoswai — Ashok Swain

Posted - December 30, 2023 at 10:39 PM

Saved - December 31, 2023 at 5:30 AM

@ashoswai - Ashok Swain

Pakistan becomes another Bangladesh! Pakistan election commission rejects former PM Imran Khan's nomination and almost all of his party candidates' nominations for 2024 elections. Pakistan Army is doing everything except a formal coup to make Nawaz Sharif the PM.

@KanekoaTheGreat — KanekoaTheGreat

Posted - January 3, 2024 at 10:13 PM

Saved - January 3, 2024 at 10:42 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

In the 2020 Presidential Election, there are allegations of election fraud in the swing states of Georgia, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Arizona, and Michigan. These allegations include altered and unlawfully cast votes, broken chain of custody, electronic manipulation, and missing or corrupted election files. Investigations have uncovered irregularities, unlawful activity, and fraud. The number of votes exceeds the number of voters in some cases. There were also issues with signature verification and the handling of absentee ballots. The report suggests that these irregularities and fraud may have affected the outcome of the election. It is important to review the evidence and draw your own conclusions.

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

🚨JUST IN - President Trump Releases Summary of Election Fraud in the 2020 Presidential Election in the Swing States Introduction: It has often been repeated there is “no evidence” of fraud in the 2020 Election. In actuality, there is no evidence Joe Biden won. Ongoing investigations in the Swing States reveal hundreds of thousands of votes were altered and/or not lawfully cast in the Presidential Election. Joe Biden needed them. On Election Night Nov. 3, 2020, President Donald J. Trump was sailing to reelection with landslide leads in numerous battlegrounds. In Georgia, President Trump was up by 12 points, and over 335,000 votes, with 56 percent of the vote in at 10:17 p.m. In Wisconsin, President Trump was leading by 121,380 votes and 5 points at 12:12 a.m., which Fox News anchor Bret Baier noted was “not a small margin.” In Pennsylvania, President Trump was leading by 659,145 votes at 12:38 a.m., a full 15 points. In Michigan, President Trump was leading by 293,052 votes and 10 points. The election was over. However, precincts in Atlanta, Detroit, Philadelphia, Phoenix, and Milwaukee kept counting until the results reached the desired outcome, which was the opposite of the will of the voters. Georgia went from having a total of 4.7 million votes, already a record for the state, according to Brad Raffensperger’s count on Nov. 4, to certifying almost 5 million. This was 300,000 more votes than what the top elections official claimed were cast in the Election. Getting to this result in Georgia, and other states, created an irredeemably compromised Election, filled with violations of the Constitution, unlawful ballots, widespread broken chain of custody, electronic manipulation, and missing and corrupted election files that made it uncertifiable — and impossible to recreate the results. President Trump was right to voice his objections to what had unfolded before the country’s eyes. Republican poll watchers were denied access to the counting in multiple jurisdictions and ballots were counted in secret in the middle of the night without media or observers present. Countless irregularities emerged, including reports of ineligible voters, voting machine anomalies, “water main breaks,” improbable percentages of ballots for Biden, and more. Since, investigations across the country have uncovered an avalanche of irregularities, unlawful activity, manipulation of election records, destruction of evidence, and fraud. The findings, which are outcome determinative, are detailed in the summaries of the Swing States. GEORGIA🚨 • Georgia was called by 11,779 votes. • Fulton County, Georgia, the most populous county in the state, has no digital record of all in person votes cast in its original results. • Not a single ballot purportedly cast during early in-person voting was witnessed to and signed off by poll managers, as required by Georgia election rules. Seals were broken and memory cards removed from tabulators for the results of these 315,000 votes, which were printed out on different machines than the ones that tabulated them. This prevented the reconciliation of how many votes were cast on each machine. • The ballot images of these votes, along with the rest of in-person ballots cast on Election Day, were destroyed. • The vote in Georgia was counted three times: the original machine count, a statewide hand recount, and a second machine count. Each time the state, and Fulton County, reported three different results. • Fulton County did not count the same ballots during the original count and the machine recount. There are 19,541 distinct ballots that appear in one machine count but not the other. • Thousands of fraudulent “presidential only” ballots were injected into the second machine count, with huge margins favoring Joe Biden. Ballots that are blank except for the presidential contest were counted in batches together, with the pattern appearing in at least eight counties, including Fulton. This means Georgia did not have the votes to justify its original Election “results.” • The second machine count was over 17,000 votes “short.” Fulton County was instructed to “reconcile” the results by the Secretary of State, and recertified its results without divulging the extent of the vote deficiency to members of the Fulton County Board of Registrations and Elections. • “Thousands of bogus votes” were ultimately added into the Election results via the second machine count. This includes 20,977 unsubstantiated votes of unknown origin. The results were missing 17,852 ballot images, and included 3,125 duplicate ballot images that were counted twice. • At least 2,871 ballots were counted two or three times in the second machine count, totaling 6,118 questionable votes. • Eighty-eight percent of Fulton County’s precincts reported a different total number of votes between the first and second machine count. • The only electronic votes that survived from the first count were the mail-in ballots, since they were tabulated on the high speed scanner their ballot images were automatically uploaded to the election server. • Ninety percent of these approximately 148,000 absentee ballots cast in Fulton County cannot be authenticated. Ballot images for 132,284 mail-in votes have no .SHA file, which is created automatically when a ballot is scanned and used to authenticate the digital image of the vote, lacking evidence they were scanned and tabulated properly, or even cast by a real voter. • 104,994 ballot image files of these mail-in ballots from the original count contained identical modified time stamps, suggesting electronic manipulation. • Fulton County does not know “how many voters cast votes” and its “lack of basic accounting controls make it impossible to determine who really won” in 2020, according to Philip Stark, a University of California, Berkeley professor who invented risk-limiting audits. Stark noted, “The electronic records of the election are not intact.” • 376,863 ballot images are missing from the first machine count, which includes all in-person votes in Fulton County. • None of the 315,000 votes cast during early voting in Fulton County were witnessed to and signed by the poll manager and two poll workers, as required by state election rules. The closing tapes for these votes are all unsigned, showed more tabulated votes than the tabulators had recorded as scanning in their protective counters, and recorded improbably low percentages for President Trump. For example, President Trump received only 0.9 percent, 2.4 percent, 3.7 percent from some of the tabulators, as if he was a third party candidate, or in a third world country. The anomalies indicate ballots were not scanned on the tabulators that printed the closing tapes, making the closing tapes fraudulent. • Tabulators used in Fulton County during early voting had their seals broken, and memory cards were reprogrammed and inserted into different scanners to count absentee ballots, in violation of election rules. This made it impossible to reconcile the true number of votes tabulated on the machines from the start of the Election to the end of counting. • 235,000 absentee ballots were requested and accepted too early, prior to the lawful date 180 days before the 2020 Election, which was May 6, 2020. These votes should have never been counted in the 2020 Election. • 4,081 false votes for Joe Biden were included in the hand count audit results for Fulton County. The false votes were the result of 36 accounting errors, which were confirmed by Governor Brian Kemp’s office and investigators working for Secretary Brad Raffensperger, yet they have never been removed from the official hand count results. These errors alone would reduce the margin to 7,698 votes. • The hand count audit included 3,935 unaccounted for votes due to 11 missing batch sheets in Fulton County. Differences from the original count to the hand audit total at least 15,690 votes, which is more than the entire election margin alone. This includes the 4,081 false Biden votes, plus “missing” votes discovered in Gwinett (1,642), Fayette (2,755), Floyd (2,700), Douglas (293), and Walton (284) counties that were likely due to machine counting errors. • Thousands of “pristine,” unfolded absentee ballots were counted during the hand count audit in Fulton County, according to at least six witnesses, which is the subject of ongoing litigation. These absentee ballots had no folds, and went 98 percent to Joe Biden, had “been added in a fraudulent manner,” witnesses said. • Fulton County certified 59,143 in-person votes on Election Day, despite the fact that only 14,152 people had voted as of 5 p.m. on Nov. 3, 2020. Evidence suggests the in-person vote total on Election Day was inflated by approximately 37,000 votes, as records show no rush to the polls during the final two hours of voting, and a screenshot of the in-person Election Day results shared by a government contractor showed only 21,843 people voted at the polls in Fulton County on Nov. 3. • Fulton County ordered over 1 million absentee ballots days before the 2020 Election, without any envelopes and the time necessary to mail. There were only 808,680 active voters in Fulton County as of Nov. 1, 2020, meaning the county had more blank mail-in ballots than the number of registered voters, and ordered them after the vast majority of mail-in ballot requests had already been sent to voters by Runbeck Election Services. • An estimated 30,000 to 92,670 illicit votes were trafficked in Georgia, as part of a massive ballot trafficking operation discovered by True the Vote. The group identified 242 traffickers in Georgia who engaged in 5,662 ballot drops into drop boxes, making an average of runs per trafficker. Over 40 percent of the illicit drops that were captured on camera were recorded between the non-voting hours of midnight and 5 a.m. • There were over 364,000 ineligible voter registrations on the rolls during the 2020 Election and likely 67,284 votes were cast from voters with invalid residency. • Massive manipulation of the Georgia voter rolls surrounding the 2020 Election has been uncovered. This includes 1,500 Voter IDs that received credit for voting in 2020, but were not on any voter rolls from 2020, some appearing for the first time on the voter rolls on Nov. 4, 2021, a year after the Election. Other findings include manipulation of inactive voters to cast ballots, “gifting” Nov. 3 votes up to 2 years after the Election, and casting votes on ballots previously rejected, cancelled, or not even turned in. • In 2020, there were absentee ballots issued to “Bangkok Thailand, Ga.,” “Denver, Ga.,” “Detroit, Ga.,” “Los Angeles, Ga.,” and other fraudulent addresses that do not exist. Ballots were fraudulently cast in 2020 from addresses listed as “Bronx, Ga.,” “Hilton Head, Ga.,” “Louisville, Ga.,” “San Diego, Ga.,” “New Orleans, Ga.,” “French Creek, Ga.,” “Virginia Beach, Ga.,” “Vicksburg, Ga.,” “Baltimore, Ga.,” “New York, Ga.,” and “Sarasota, Ga.,” all with zip codes out of state. • 43,907 drop box ballots violated chain of custody requirements in DeKalb County. • 59,000 of the 79,460 drop box ballots in Fulton County were not immediately transported to the election registrar, in violation of State Election Board rules. • An estimated 355,000 ballot transfer forms for drop box ballots are missing statewide. • Over 100,000 tally sheets for Fulton County were missing from the hand count audit, and remained missing for months after the Election. • In early January 2021, Ruby Freeman asked for an attorney because she wanted to “go live on every platform” to divulge information about how “the USB ports” were used in the 2020 Election. The expert cyber report by Professor J. Alex Halderman explained how external USB ports with election-changing malware can be inserted into Dominion machines by anyone with access, including election workers. • The presence of a “QR code mismatch” error within the Dominion tabulators that systematically undercounts votes was found in 65 out of 67 Georgia counties where records were available. The error was present in system log files for tabulators used in elections in 2020, 2021, and 2022. • The election results in Georgia in 2020 are not only unreliable, but were electronically altered, and are unsupported by the state’s own election records. The appearance of tens of thousands of unconfirmed ballots in subsequent hand and machine counts suggest reconciliation happened after the Election, meaning after it was clear what margins were needed to win. • Fulton County election officials admitted in early 2021 they do not engage in any reconciliation until weeks after Election Day. This means the number of voters showing up at the polls during each day of voting is not checked with the number of ballots tabulated each day, a basic process to ensure the number of ballots and voters match, and cannot be manipulated later. • “We can’t start reconciling that until usually a couple days before certification,” said then-Fulton County Elections Director Richard Barron, during a January 2021 Board meeting. “Because we have to get that report from KnowInk. I think KnowInk sends those to the state or KnowInk sends those directly to us. But those aren’t compiled then, on Election night. So we don’t have any way to balance those then. That’s like the post-election process that we do.”

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

JUST IN - President Trump Releases Summary of Election Fraud in the 2020 Presidential Election in the Swing States WISCONSIN🚨 • Wisconsin was called by 20,682 votes. • The Wisconsin Supreme Court ruled drop boxes are illegal under Wisconsin law, in a 4-3 decision issued in July 2022. • Wisconsin Election Commissioner Meagan Wolfe unilaterally declared ballot drop boxes could be used to vote in 2020 elections, even though “WEC’s commissioners never voted to adopt this memo.” • Ahead of the November 2020 Election, Wolfe encouraged clerks to use “creative solutions” to deploy drop boxes, that she said could be “unstaffed.” There were 528 drop boxes used in the General Election, and a total of 1,969,274 absentee votes cast, including 1,346,731 votes cast by mail, and 653,236 in-person. • In a concurring opinion to the ruling finding drop boxes to be unlawful, Justice Rebecca Bradley writes, “If the right to vote is to have any meaning at all, elections must be conducted according to law. Throughout history, tyrants have claimed electoral victory via elections conducted in violation of governing law… in Wisconsin elected officials “deriv[e] their just powers from the consent of the governed.” • “The right to vote presupposes the rule of law governs elections. If elections are conducted outside of the law, the people have not conferred their consent on the government. Such elections are unlawful and their results are illegitimate.” • Justice Bradley concluded “thousands of votes have been cast via this unlawful method,” using drop boxes, “thereby directly harming the Wisconsin voters.” • “The illegality of these drop boxes weakens the people’s faith that the election produced an outcome reflective of their will,” Justice Bradley writes. “The Wisconsin voters, and all lawful voters, are injured when the institution charged with administering Wisconsin elections does not follow the law, leaving the results in question…Electoral outcomes obtained by unlawful procedures corrupt the institution of voting, degrading the very foundation of free government. Unlawful votes do not dilute lawful votes so much as they pollute them, which in turn pollutes the integrity of the results.” • In the city of Milwaukee, nearly half of all its votes were cast by mail, totaling 217,424 ballots. The city deployed 15 drop boxes, with election officials claiming the drop boxes would be “under 24-hour surveillance.” However, after the election, not a single municipality in the county produced video surveillance of drop boxes in response to open records requests. Various responses included, “No records exist for your request,” “No video from requested time frame,” “No such records exist,” and “No security camera.” • The election integrity group True the Vote identified 107 ballot traffickers in Milwaukee County between Oct. 20 and Nov. 3, 2020, who each made 20 or more visits to drop boxes. Each trafficker made an average 26 visits, and as many as 15 in one day, and made multiple visits to non-governmental organizations. • The 107 traffickers made a total of 2,824 trips to drop boxes during the 2020 Election, with a majority of visits occurring after 8:00 p.m. • In 2020 there was a surge of “indefinitely confined” votes in Wisconsin, resulting in 220,404 votes cast from individuals who were exempted from showing voter ID. This surge of suspect votes was due to Democrat election clerks giving advice that was deemed illegal after the election, instructing voters to identify themselves as disabled during the COVID pandemic to avoid voter ID laws. • Indefinitely confined voters, who are supposed to be physically unable to go to the polls due to age, disability, or illness, increased by an astounding 393 percent in Dane County from 2016 to 2020; 492 percent in Racine County; 281 percent in Milwaukee County; and 287 percent in the state overall. • There were just 56,978 indefinitely confined votes in 2016, and roughly 70,000 43 in 2019. In 2020, however, there were 220,404 votes cast using indefinite confinement status. Over 77 percent of these individuals had never been listed as indefinitely confined before. The Wisconsin Legislative Audit Bureau identified 48,554 people who voted as indefinitely confined in November 2020 who had never provided photo identification or did not have photo identifications on file with clerks, which is more than twice the vote margin of 20,682. • Scott McDonell, the Democrat clerk of Dane County, which encompasses the area of Madison, told all residents they could identify themselves as indefinitely confined because of COVID, specifically citing it as a way to get around the Voter ID law. • McDonell previously blamed Wisconsin’s voter ID law for President Trump’s victory in 2016, claiming in a 2018 Twitter post that “thousands of voters [were] deterred from voting due to [the] ID law.” • In 2020, McDonell urged all voters to declare themselves indefinitely confined in order to obtain an absentee ballot and “skip the step of uploading an ID” in the April 2020 primary election. Once a voter is identified as indefinitely confined, they continue to receive absentee ballots automatically for subsequent elections. “I urge all voters who request a ballot and have trouble presenting a valid ID to indicate that they are indefinitely confined,” McDonell said in a Facebook post. • The Wisconsin Supreme Court ruled in December 2020 that the pandemic “did not render all Wisconsin electors ‘indefinitely confined,’ thereby obviating the requirement of a valid photo identification to obtain an absentee ballot,” and the clerks’ “interpretation of Wisconsin election laws was erroneous.” • The Wisconsin Election Commission ordered nursing homes to violate the law by not allowing Special Voting Deputies (SVDs) inside their facilities, which led to election fraud where incapacitated elderly residents had votes cast in their name with the assistance of nursing home staff. • An investigation by the Racine County Sheriff found the Wisconsin Elections Commission “shattered” state election laws. Nursing homes saw an “unusual surge in voting activity,” and at least 8 cases of felony voter fraud were found in one nursing home, accounting for nearly 1 in 5 families of residents. • The Wisconsin Election Commission admitted it was “essentially telling the clerks to break the law” by ordering the sending of absentee ballots to nursing homes and barring Special Voting Deputies inside the facilities. • An interim report released by Special Counsel Michael J. Gableman raised “serious and legitimate questions that the certification of Wisconsin’s election results may have been undertaken in an unlawful and unconstitutional manner.” • Gableman claimed “Democracy in the Park” events in Madison involved numerous possible violations of the law, “calling into question the validity of over 17,000 absentee ballots.” • These outdoor events to collect mail-in ballots were the subject of numerous complaints, and it is “not clear that all of the workers at those events were properly deputized and trained, swore and filed the mandatory oath of office, or documents related to absentee ballots were properly handled.” • The Office of the Special Counsel also claimed evidence of “undue influence by well-funded private groups, who leveraged large grants to certain Wisconsin cities in order to co-opt our election apparatus to their benefit.” • The report confirms at least 17.5 percent of election clerks “were not properly trained,” and that “exploitation of elders” occurred in nursing homes. • In one example, Maryl Barrett, who was 104 years old and did not recognize her own children, had a ballot cast in her name in the 2020 Presidential Election. • The Office of Special Counsel’s second interim report found nursing homes in Milwaukee, Dane, and Racine counties with 100 percent turnout due to the Wisconsin Election Commission’s order. • The special counsel said it possessed evidence of nursing home facility staff and directors who “assisted residents in completing ballots; assisted residents in obtaining absentee ballots; pressured residents to vote; collected completed ballots from residents; forged signatures of residents; illegally returned residents’ ballots to the municipal clerks by mail, by placing the ballots in drop boxes, and/ or delivering them directly to the clerks; pressured and/or assisted incompetent persons to complete and cast ballots in the November 2020 election, up to and including persons who have had their right to vote take away by court order due to mental incompetence.” • The second interim report also detailed an $8.8 million “election bribery scheme” involving Mark Zuckerberg’s Center for Tech and Civic Life and the cities of Milwaukee, Madison, Racine, Kenosha, and Green Bay. “In the agreement, the Cities took CTCL’s money to facilitate in-person and absentee voting within their respective city.” • The “Wisconsin Safe Voting Plan” developed for CTCL facilitated grants to major Wisconsin cities to deploy drop boxes for mail-in ballots, including $50,000 to Green Bay, $40,000 to Kenosha, $50,000 to Madison, $58,500 to Milwaukee, and $18,000 to Racine. • Whitney May, the director of government services for CTCL, posted numerous anti-Trump posts on social media, including telling people “don’t vote for Trump” in 2016. • Internal emails from election officials in Green Bay revealed Michael SpitzerRubenstein, a former Democratic Party operative, served as a “de facto elections administrator and had access to Green Bay’s absentee ballots days before the election.” • The Office of the Special Counsel referenced this case, and has evidence that this grantee, which was funded by CTCL, was “directly involved in all aspects of management of election officials, was entrusted with the only sets of physical keys to the city’s central count location, managed the transportation of ballots, and instructed the counting of unlawful ballots that had arrived at the central count location beyond the lawful time window.”

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

JUST IN - President Trump Releases Summary of Election Fraud in the 2020 Presidential Election in the Swing States PENNSYLVANIA🚨 • Pennsylvania was called by 80,555 votes. • Months after the election, there were 121,240 more votes than voters, according to the Pennsylvania Department of State. By law, Pennsylvania cannot certify an election with this type of discrepancy. • Republican lawmakers, led by State Representative Frank Ryan, were tracking the vote discrepancy in real time in the Statewide Uniform Registry of Electors (SURE) system. Ryan, a certified public accountant, initially reported that there were 170,830 more votes than voters in the Presidential race, more than twice the margin in Pennsylvania. “These numbers just don’t add up, and the alleged certification of Pennsylvania’s presidential election results was absolutely premature, unconfirmed, and in error,” the lawmakers said. • The Pennsylvania Department of State’s office called this “obvious misinformation,” while admitting the “only way to determine the number of voters who voted in November from the SURE system is through the vote histories,” which they said Philadelphia, Allegheny, and other counties had still not completed — an admission the election was certified without ensuring the number of voters and votes matched in the SURE system. The election was certified on Nov. 24, 2020, and the Department of State’s statement came on Dec. 29, 2020. • The SURE system was checked and downloaded weekly with updated voter histories from the general Election until all the counties uploaded their vote histories, which was not completed until February 2021. At this time there were still over 121,000 votes that did not have a corresponding voter in the SURE system. • The statement by the Department of State “that the voting would reconcile, once the counties completed their SURE uploads, was incorrect,” according to Verity Vote. “When the final county finished uploading their voter histories and closed the election in SURE, it was February 1, 2021, which was the same day that [Secretary of State Kathy] Boockvar announced her resignation. At the time that Philadelphia closed the election in SURE, the voter histories showed that the county accepted at least 7,944 ballots that could not be associated with a registered voter.” • Pennsylvania credited 71,893 people for voting who returned mail-in ballots after Election Day, and these individuals were included in the voter history files. This includes 50,285 received between Nov. 4 and Nov. 6; 11,570 received between Nov. 7 and Nov. 11; and 10,038 that were received on or after Nov. 12. Boockvar claimed only 10,000 ballots were received between the close of the polls on Election Day and Nov. 6. • While 71,893 people received credit for voting by mail, these votes purportedly did not count. Even while including these voters in the total number of who participated in the Election, Pennsylvania still came up 121,240 voters short. • According to the Department of State data, there were 7,035,746 ballots cast in the 2020 Presidential Election, including all write-in votes, over-votes, and under-votes. “After all counties closed the election in SURE, only 6,914,556 voters were credited with participation in the 2020 General Election. This reveals a voter deficit of 121,240.” • In Philadelphia, hundreds of thousands of mail-in ballots were unlawfully counted in secret, in defiance of a court order, while Republican poll watchers were thrown out of buildings where voting took place. • U.S. Attorney Bill McSwain was told to stand down and not investigate election irregularities by Attorney General Bill Barr. McSwain said he was instructed to not discuss the allegations of voter fraud he received, and to pass any “serious” investigations along to then-State Attorney General Josh Shapiro, a Democrat who promised days before the election that President Trump “is going to lose.” • Mark Zuckerberg of Facebook poured over $25 million into the administration of the election in Pennsylvania in 2020. Over $10 million went to the Democrat-controlled jurisdiction of Philadelphia, which included $5.5 million on “ballot processing equipment” and $552,000 for drop boxes. • A lawsuit filed in Delaware County revealed video evidence of election officials discussing destroying election evidence from the November 2020 Election. “It’s a felony,” one official says after talking about the need to “get rid” of voting “pads and second scanners.” Sources involved in the litigation alleged the Delaware County officials violated numerous election laws and that the destruction of records was “done to ensure records eventually provided actually matched the election results that were reported in Nov. 2020.” • Delaware County received $2.2 million from Zuckerberg’s Center for Tech and Civic Life (CTCL), which it spent on “recruiting and training a sufficient number of poll workers; setting up drop box locations for voters to return ballots,” and other Get Out the Vote efforts. • The election integrity group True the Vote said Philadelphia was the worst offender it witnessed when investigating the widespread ballot trafficking scheme operating across multiple Swing States in 2020. They identified 1,155 ballot traffickers who each visited at least 10 drop boxes and five non-governmental organizations. Some ballot traffickers made hundreds of trips to drop boxes.

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

JUST IN - President Trump Releases Summary of Election Fraud in the 2020 Presidential Election in the Swing States ARIZONA🚨 • Arizona was called by a margin of 10,457 votes. • Maricopa County accepted 20,500 mail-in ballots after Election Day 2020, including 18,000 – more than the entire election margin – on Nov. 4 picked up from the U.S. Postal Service. By law, ballots must be received no later than 7 p.m. on Election Day, which was Nov. 3. • “The 20,000 ballots recorded as incoming from the USPS on and after November 4 were of sufficient quantity to change the result of the 2020 General Election in Arizona,” according to Verity Vote. • The findings were based on Maricopa County’s official Elections Department records, which were withheld from a public records request for nearly seven months. The records showed 18,000 mail-in ballots received on Nov. 4; 1,000 received on Nov. 5; and 1,500 received on Nov. 6. • The 18,000 mail-in ballots received on Nov. 4 and subsequently counted represented a significant spike in ballots received, higher than every single day total since Oct. 29, 2020. The receipt of mail-in ballots had steadily declined from 14,500 ballots on Oct. 29 to 10,500 on Oct. 30; 6,000 on Oct. 31; 1,500 on Nov. 1; 1,000 on Nov. 2; and 2,500 on Nov. 3. • In the 2020 General Election, 420,987 ballots failed signature verification standards, “thus the election was openly vulnerable to fraud,” according to an ongoing analysis conducted by We the People Arizona Alliance and presented to the state legislature. • The initial analysis of 380,976 ballots, using official state records and official signature verification training techniques, identified 181,378 ballots that should not have been counted, or nearly half of all reviewed. • This includes: 1,870 blank envelopes, some of which were approved on Nov. 5 and Nov. 8; 542 with a signature other than the voter; 2,104 scribbles; 128 duplicate voters processed; 48,117 unreasonably different control signatures; 1,875 where the signature did not match until after the election; 36,034 control signatures that do not match the voter; 4,433 unusable control signatures; 47,366 that failed Secretary of State standards; and 38,909 egregious signature mismatches, where not one point of a signature matched any on file. • In the case of the 1,875 votes, the ballot envelopes did not have a signature match on Election Day, but “matching” signatures were later put on file for the voter on either Jan. 28, 2021, Feb. 3, 2021, or Feb. 8, 2021. There were 783 signatures digitally inserted on Feb. 3, 2021 alone. • Since the findings were presented to the Arizona State Legislature, the number of egregious mismatches found has increased to 76,354, over seven times the election margin. This is an error rate of 9.30 percent of ballot envelopes reviewed. • Throughout the signature verification analysis, which remains ongoing, analysts have consistently found 20 percent do not meet the Secretary of State’s standards, and 9 percent are egregious violations. Extrapolated to all 1.9 million mail-in ballots in 2020, 176,700 ballots “should have been rejected for improper signature verification due to egregious signature mismatches.” • Maricopa County has no documented chain of custody for 740,000 ballots from the 2020 Election. • Out of the 923,000 early vote ballots accepted at vote centers or drop boxes, only 183,406 ballots are accounted for on ballot transport forms. More than 80 percent of the ballot transport forms have no ballot counts. • Without proper documentation of how many votes were cast at the time they were cast, it is impossible to verify the origin and true total of ballots in a given election. “Without this count, there is no way to determine if the transport staff retrieved one ballot or one thousand ballots,” according to Verity Vote. “Keeping a proper chain of custody is more than a best practice - it is essential to encouraging trust in our democracy,” according to the Election Assistance Commission. • Of the 1,895 early vote ballot transport forms, 48 did not have the required two witness signatures attesting to the ballot transfer, including some with no witness signatures at all. “As a result, the public is not assured that both parties witnessed the transfer of ballots,” as required. • Millions of files of 2020 General Election data and security logs were deleted from the Elections Management Server and purged on critical days, including the day before the Arizona audit of the 2020 Election began on Feb. 2, 2021. • The Maricopa County Board of Supervisors admitted they purged the system and moved election data after they received a subpoena, in testimony before the U.S. House of Representatives. • Two precincts in Pima County had over 100 percent turnout for mail-in ballots, and 40 precincts had over 97 percent returned. • The national mail-in ballot return rate was 71 percent, but in Pima County the mail-in ballot return rate was 15 percent higher, and 19 percent higher than all the counties combined in the entire state of Arizona. One precinct with 99.5 percent mail-in turnout had 9,812 ballots counted. Another precinct with 100.6 percent turnout had 2,182 ballots returned, but only 2,170 mail-ins were ever sent. These two precincts total 11,994 ballots, which alone is more than the margin needed to alter the outcome of the Presidential Election. • In all, there were 264,000 votes from precincts in Pima County with over 92 percent turnout for mail-in ballots. • Significant anomalies were discovered for mail-in ballot returns in Pima County. In precincts with anomalous high turnout of over 92 percent in Pima County, mail-in ballots started flipping from 6 percent Republican for Biden to 40 percent of Republicans voting for Biden. • The election integrity group True the Vote identified more than 202 ballot traffickers in Maricopa County who made 4,282 individual drop box visits during the 2020 General Election. • Two individuals were charged and plead guilty for ballot harvesting in Yuma County, Arizona during the 2020 primary election. • A computer scientist testified that an algorithm similar to what is used in cruise control or self-driving cars was present affecting the early votes in Pima and Maricopa counties in the 2020 General Election, with the ability to “reach and maintain a predetermined setpoint (outcome) despite unplanned disturbances.” • Walter C. Daugherity, a senior lecturer emeritus in the Department of Computer Science and Engineering at Texas A&M University who developed courses in artificial intelligence, expert systems, programming and software design, analyzed the Cast Vote Records, finding, “ballots in Maricopa County and Pima County were artificially processed through the tabulators tracking a ProportionalIntegral-Derivative (PID) type control function in a closed-loop feedback system.” • Daugherity, who has received over $2.8 million in grant funding and was previously consulted as a computer expert by the New York Times, Washington Post, IBM Federal Systems Division, the Texas Department of Agriculture, U.S. Customs Service, as well as classified work, discovered “significant and systematic decline in the cumulative ratio as counting progresses,” in the early mail-in and in-person votes for the Presidential Election results in Maricopa County and Pima County. • For example, the “first block of ballots being 75 [percent] for a candidate, the next block of ballots being 74 [percent] for a candidate, the next block of ballots being 73 [percent] for a candidate, and so on, systematically declining all the way to Election Day.” • Daugherity’s expert opinion is that the downward sloping line in the sequence that votes were recorded indicated a strong control. The cumulative ratio of Biden to Trump votes for all cast vote records before Election Day in recorded order for Pima County declines from over 300 percent to 157 percent by Election Day. • “Such a uniform and predictable pattern is so statistically implausible that it would not occur without artificial manipulation,” according to Daugherity. The data’s lack of independence cannot be explained by the preference of Democrats voting earlier than Republicans.

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

JUST IN - President Trump Releases Summary of Election Fraud in the 2020 Presidential Election in the Swing States MICHIGAN🚨 • Michigan was called by 154,188 votes. • A record 5,579,317 votes were cast and certified in Michigan in the 2020 General Election, the highest turnout in 60 years. To date, Michigan has never shown 5,579,317 voters listed for the 2020 Election in its Qualified Voter File, the state’s database for all voter registration records. • As of December 2023, Michigan has 271,566 more votes than the number of voters listed in its Qualified Voter File for Nov. 3, 2020, more than one and a half times the Election margin. • In data obtained from the Secretary of State’s office on nearly a monthly basis since the Election, the most voters ever recorded in the Qualified Voter File was 5,511,303 voters in April 2021. This means Michigan’s own election records showed 68,014 more votes than voters. However, the number of voters listed in the Qualified Voter File has been in flux ever since December 2020, and always short of the voters needed to reconcile the total votes cast. A complete list of voters from 2020 has never been provided. • The number of voter IDs listed as voting in 2020 has steadily declined since February 2022. As of December 2023, there was a total of 5,307,751 voters listed as voting on Nov. 3, 2020 in the Qualified Voter File. Voter history files continue to be removed from the record, resulting in 271,566 less vote history records than necessary to reconcile the results. • Each month voter histories from the 2020 Election are being manipulated. Thousands of unique votes are removed from the voter history files, and other unique votes added. Since December 2020, 270,559 voter histories for 2020 have been removed, while 103,128 have been added. • Individual voter histories are constantly changing, including the history of the state’s Democrat Governor Gretchen Whitmer, whose voting history is missing votes throughout 2020. • A complete list of voters was requested via a Freedom of Information Act request in December 2021 and took nine months for the state to fulfill. Two datasets were provided, and neither matched. The first dataset fell 22,146 voters short, while the second dataset was 120,883 absentee ballots short. • Democrats threatened Republicans on the Wayne County Board of Canvassers and doxxed children in order to certify the 2020 results. Monica Palmer, then the chair of the Wayne County Board of Supervisors, cited the fact that 70 percent of Detroit’s mail-in ballot counts were still “out of balance and unexplained” from the August primary as a reason why she initially voted against certifying the 2020 Election results. Palmer was “bullied and threatened” and “feared for her safety” due to threats she received for voting no. A Democrat Michigan State representative-elect attacked Palmer over her certification vote, and revealed where her children went to school, saying, “I want you to think about what that means for your kids.” • Officials in Detroit illegally blocked Republican poll challengers’ access, covered the windows, called the cops, and denied lawful challenges in order to count ballots in secret. • Affidavits and video evidence revealed thousands of ballots were delivered through a back door of the TCF center, the central counting facility in Detroit, at 3:30 a.m. on Election night. • A report seeking to “debunk” issues of fraud released by the Michigan State Senate Oversight Committee confirmed a “large volume” of ballots were delivered to the TCF center with no chain of custody in the middle of the night. • An estimated 289,866 absentee ballots were identified as sent to people who never requested them, “something that would be illegal,” according to the senate committee. • Mark Zuckerberg gave Michigan $16.8 million through his nonprofit Center for Tech and Civic Life. • Detroit received $7.4 million to “dramatically” expand the vote for Democrats. The grants financed drop boxes “to facilitate the return of absentee ballots,” like the ones that came in the TCF center after midnight. • The election integrity group True the Vote uncovered the same pattern of widespread ballot trafficking between NGOs and ballot drop boxes in Michigan. Numerous instances of ballot stuffing were caught on camera in Detroit, including video where a woman can be seen going to a drop box, and abruptly returning to her car after realizing the stack had no signatures. The woman then signs the ballots, and deposits the illicit ballots she had just signed into the drop box. • Secretary Jocelyn Benson made unlawful changes to signature verification rules for absentee ballots, ordering election workers to presume all were legitimate. A judge ruled Benson’s order was invalid, but not until months following the election, and just 0.1 percent of mail-in ballots were rejected in the November 2020 Election for all signature issues. The rejection rate for mismatching signatures was just 0.04 percent, as only 1,400 out of 3.4 million ballots were rejected. • Secretary Benson has lost in court six times for issues related to the 2020 Election. • A fraudulent voter registration scheme was discovered in October 2020 and documented in a police report in Muskegon County and hidden for nearly 3 years after the 2020 Election. • A city clerk in Muskegon witnessed a woman drop off between 8,000 and 10,000 voter registrations at the clerk office on Oct. 8, 2020, many appearing to be fraudulent. The incident was reported it to the Muskegon Police Department one week later. Eight thousand new voter registrations in Muskegon would amount to over 20 percent of the city’s population of only 38,000 residents. • An ensuing investigation confirmed thousands of voter registrations in the same handwriting and many invalid or non-existent addresses. The suspect told Michigan State Police that she was being paid $1,150 per week to “find unregistered voters and provide them with a form so they can get registered to vote or obtain their absentee ballot.” The police found “dozens of new phones” and “hundreds of pre-paid payment cards” during the investigation. • A Department of State analyst consulted in the investigation confirmed a quantity of voter applications were “clearly fraudulent” and others were “highly suspicious having either erroneous or are missing key pieces of information.” Others appeared to be legitimate. • The organization behind the scheme was GBI Strategies, a firm hired by numerous Democrat campaigns. GBI Strategies was funded by a super PAC called “Black PAC,” which paid the firm $11,254,919 to register voters for Joe Biden in 2020. Employees of GBI Strategies were paid $15 an hour or $120 a day, according to the police report. • GBI Strategies was believed to be operating not just in Muskegon, but throughout Michigan and in other Swing States. • Democrat Attorney General Dana Nessel’s office contacted the Muskegon Police Department and asked Michigan State Police to assist with a joint investigation. The Michigan police then turned their investigation over to the FBI. • Andrew Kloster, deputy general counsel at the United States Office of Personnel Management during the Trump Administration, said he was made aware of the investigation into GBI Strategies before the 2020 Election and attempted to raise the issue for further investigation. He was informed there were “standing orders not to deal with election matters” in the offices of the White House counsel office and Attorney General Bill Barr. • The investigation was not made public until 2023, after the police reports were obtained through a Michigan Freedom of Information Act request.

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

President Trump Releases Summary of Election Fraud in the 2020 Presidential Election in the Swing States I look forward to fact-checkers debunking this, citing sources from the corporate media that spent four years claiming Donald Trump was a Russian agent and dismissing Hunter Biden's laptop as Russian disinformation. I encourage you to personally review the numerous citations in this report and reach your own conclusions. https://cdn.nucleusfiles.com/e0/e04e630c-63ff-4bdb-9652-e0be3598b5d4/summary20of20election20fraud20in20the20swing20states.pdf

@MoeedNj — Moeed Pirzada

Posted - February 8, 2024 at 6:36 PM

Saved - February 8, 2024 at 8:20 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

Imran Khan's PTI is leading in 140 constituencies out of 266 in Pakistan's elections. There are challenges, such as attacks on polling stations and snatching of ballot boxes. TV channels are not allowed to declare results, and internet shutdowns have occurred. It's important to focus on the facts and support the people of Pakistan rather than the army generals.

@MoeedNj - Moeed Pirzada

People of Pakistan have spoken! Imran Khan’s PTI despite insurmountable challenges is leading in 140 constituencies out of 266 across Pakistan. Generals of Pakistan have stopped TV Channels from declaring results. Polling stations are being attacked, ballot boxes being snatched. Internet that was shut down at 8am is again being shut down. It’s time to look at facts, time to stand with people of Pakistan and not Army Generals! Please Don’t let Pakistan to become another Iran! @BradSherman @IlhanMN @HouseForeignGOP @RepSpanberger @usembislamabad @amnestyusa @SecBlinken @RepSlotkin @AmbJohnBolton @nytimesworld @piersmorgan @BDUTT

@soldierspeaks — Adil Raja

Posted - February 8, 2024 at 7:39 PM

Saved - February 8, 2024 at 8:23 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

The success of PTI is a threat to the junta and Asim Munir. Movement of troops from Mangla to Islamabad and Rawalpindi raises suspicion. Reports suggest massive rigging by the ISI under military protection to change election results.

@soldierspeaks - Adil Raja

This information is of vital importance. The success of PTI is unimaginable for the junta. Asim Munir cannot absorb it, neither can the army. How could they let PTI decide their fate? Their entire game could be disrupted. According to further reports from Mangla, there is some movement of troops taking place. Please note that the mood of officers at Military Operation Directorate was suspicious. Why are additional troops being moved from Mangla to Islamabad and Rawalpindi?" There are reports of massive rigging by the ISI under protection of the military troops. Asim Munir wishes to re-create 1970 scenario. They are changing the results at the Returning Officers offices.

@Haider4PTI — Haider Ali

Posted - February 10, 2024 at 1:28 PM

Saved - February 10, 2024 at 6:44 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

The internet and Twitter have been shut down in Pakistan due to state repression. People are protesting against the theft of their votes and facing teargas shelling. #Pakistan #ElectionResults #مینڈیٹ_پر_ڈاکا_نامنظور

@Haider4PTI - Haider Ali

State Repression Alert 🚨🚨🚨 This is why the internet & Twitter have been shut down in #Pakistan because the state & the military establishment are teargas shelling on people who have come out to protest against the theft of their votes. @SkyNews @amnesty @ryangrim @UNWatch @hrw @TRTWorldNow @TIME @UNWatch @business #ElectionResults #مینڈیٹ_پر_ڈاکا_نامنظور

@GBalloutine — George Balloutine™

Posted - March 6, 2024 at 6:13 AM

Saved - March 6, 2024 at 11:47 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

There are concerns about election fraud in Harris County, TX. Dan Crenshaw's victory is being questioned due to two precincts having zero votes for @thejamesonellis, which seems statistically impossible. Issues include machine errors, drive-through voting at all polling locations, and voting booths displaying incorrect candidates. Additionally, the Harris County DA was told she had already voted when she went to vote.

@GBalloutine - George Balloutine™

Real Time Election Fraud in Harris County TX! Dan Crenshaw did NOT Win. 2 Precincts Totals Came In & NOT 1 vote in either of them for @thejamesonellis That's STATISTICALLY IMPOSSIBLE!!! Errors with machines, Drive through voting at every Harris County polling location. Voting booths showing the wrong candidates in the wrong areas. And here is the Icing on the cake, Harris County’s DA Went to Vote Today & WHEN SHE GOT THERE, THEY TOLD HER SHE ALREADY VOTED.

@simonateba — Simon Ateba

Posted - May 15, 2024 at 9:01 PM

Saved - May 15, 2024 at 9:14 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

A judge has ordered a new election for the 180th District Court seat in Harris County, Texas, due to allegations of 1,430 illegal votes. Tami Pierce challenged her 449-vote loss to Dasean Jones, leading the court to determine that the true outcome of the election cannot be determined.

@simonateba - Simon Ateba

BREAKING - RIGGED ELECTION? A judge has just ordered a new election for the 180th District Court seat in Harris County, Texas, following Tami Pierce's challenge to her 449-vote loss to Dasean Jones in the November 2022 election. The decision comes after allegations that 1,430 illegal votes were cast, leading the court to determine that the true outcome of the election cannot be ascertained.

@BehizyTweets — George

Posted - October 28, 2024 at 9:38 PM

Saved - October 29, 2024 at 2:09 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

I learned that RNC lawyers have alerted Pennsylvania officials about voters facing issues at the polls, including claims of downed computers and early closures. It seems like a more direct approach, like filing lawsuits, might be necessary to ensure voters can cast their ballots.

@BehizyTweets - George

BREAKING: RNC lawyers have sent a letter to Pennsylvania officials saying that voters are being denied at the polls "Voters consistently report to us... they are told that “computers are down,” the site will be closing early, they are not accepting any more voters, and that mail ballots will not be counted." Let's just skip the whole sending letters thing and go straight to filing lawsuits to force them to do their job.

@JosephLTrahan — Joseph L Trahan for Senate District 15

Posted - November 4, 2024 at 6:16 PM

Saved - November 5, 2024 at 12:30 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

I’m raising concerns about the Harris County Central Count's handling of voter numbers during early voting. It seems they adjusted the daily totals significantly, with reports of thousands of voters disappearing from HCC South Loop and being moved to Kashmere. My team and I actively engaged with voters at the polling location, distributing campaign buttons to those who had just voted. On one day alone, we observed 2,500 voters, yet the official count was later adjusted to just 711. We demand clarity on these discrepancies, especially with over 60 polling locations showing similar shifts.

@JosephLTrahan - Joseph L Trahan for Senate District 15

BREAKING NEWS: Harris County Central Count must have some kind of secret teleportation device they used to remove 2000 to 3000 voters a day from HCC South Loop and moved them to Kashmere every day of early voting after the fact. THIS is merely one of many astounding feats overcoming the limitations of time and space, physics, Rodney Ellis' team has been able to achieve. Me, my team and other candidates worked HCC Southloop many days of the early voting period. For instance, Wednesday we know for a fact we passed out 1000 campaign buttons to voters that exited the polling location with a "I Voted" sticker, many of which we had spoken with as they were entering the polling location. Wednesday Oct 30 at HCC 610 loop easily 2,500 voters entered that voting center by all accounts and this morning Harris County Central Count adjusted that number to 711? Over 60 daily totals shifted from heavy "Republican" polling locations to heavy "Democrat" polling locations. We want answers. Left Totals at polls closing Friday evening and these numbers lasted online until the morning where the image at right shifted 60 different daily totals as indicated entirely inconsistent with first hand on site witnesses at these polling locations. @KenPaxtonTX @TeamBettencourt @DanPatrick @merissahansen17 @hollyshansen @GrooganFox26

@MichelleRM68 — Michelle #AmericaFirst

Posted - November 5, 2024 at 2:03 PM

Saved - November 5, 2024 at 9:17 PM

@MichelleRM68 - Michelle #AmericaFirst

BREAKING: Here they go again!! According to Lara Trump, in PA, there were 8 different counties trying to block Republican poll watchers from entering the building!!! 👇👇👇 https://t.co/6OvrDWpfbn

Video Transcript AI Summary

Pennsylvania is the focus, as we faced challenges with poll watchers being denied entry in eight counties, including areas near Philadelphia and Pittsburgh. We quickly mobilized our election integrity operation to address these issues, and I'm pleased to report all our poll watchers are now inside. It's a crucial state for us, and we've been actively campaigning there, holding two rallies with Donald Trump yesterday, while Kamala Harris was also in the state. The support from the people of Pennsylvania was encouraging, and we remain optimistic about our chances.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Well, I'd be lying, Lawrence, if I said anything other than Pennsylvania. Yeah. We already, this morning from the RNC, had to do a little work with our attorneys because our poll watchers, if you can believe this, and I'm sure people can, were being prevented from entering the buildings in 8 different counties, some of them around Philadelphia, some of them outside of Pittsburgh, where they prevented our poll watchers, our Republican poll watchers from going in. So we had to act in a moment's notice, and that's why we designed this election integrity operation the way we did to identify problems and strike at a moment's notice. And all of our poll watchers, I'm happy to report, are in. But, look, it's a tight state, and it's a must win state. And I think, you know, we've seen so much emphasis put in that state. We were there twice yesterday. We did 2 rallies with Donald Trump. Obviously, Kamala Harris was there yesterday. But I gotta tell you, we felt a lot of love from people in Pennsylvania yesterday, so we're very optimistic.

@TheGrumpyGitPA — Jason Hatton

Posted - November 5, 2024 at 3:45 PM

Saved - November 6, 2024 at 11:34 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

I’ve been tracking several irregularities during the 2024 general election in Pennsylvania. In Lancaster, a fraudulent voter registration scheme was uncovered, with thousands of applications submitted at the last minute. Similar issues arose in Luzerne County, where a former elections board member dumped numerous applications. Bucks County faced early voting shutdowns, leading to extended voting days after a lawsuit. Reports of machine failures and polling delays emerged across various counties, raising concerns about election integrity. Despite these issues, officials declared the election fair.

@TheGrumpyGitPA - Jason Hatton

Here is a list of all the "irregularities" that I am aware of during the 2024 general election in PA. 10/25/24 - Lancaster, PA. Paid canvassers dumped a large number of applications off at the last minute, with at least some of them being fraudulent.

@BehizyTweets - George

BREAKING: Lancaster, Pennsylvania officials have BUSTED a large-scale fraudulent voter registration scheme that includes thousands of applications with the same handwriting, fake signatures, false addresses, etc They discovered the same scheme in other Pennsylvania counties. District Attorney Heather Adams revealed that the applications came from canvassers who were paid to obtain voter registrations, adding that "The majority of the applications were from residents in the city of Lancaster... The canvases themselves took place at various shopping centers, parking lots of grocery stores and businesses, sidewalks and parks." "We are aware of at least two other counties that receive similar applications that are currently being investigated." If you listen closely, the DA said the Clerk received the applications at or near the deadline to register to vote. That means the bad actors waited till the last minute so no one would notice. They would've used the fraudulent applications to commit mail-in ballot fraud without getting caught. We better check the entire state of Pennsylvania, and we better see arrests NOW.

Video Transcript AI Summary

Good morning. On Tuesday, I was informed by Krista Miller about potentially fraudulent voter registration applications. The Elections Office received around 2,500 applications close to the registration deadline, many showing the same handwriting and mismatched signatures. Investigations revealed inaccuracies in addresses and personal information, with individuals stating they did not complete these forms. The fraudulent registrations are linked to a large-scale canvassing operation that began in June, primarily in Lancaster City, but also in other areas. Preliminary findings indicate that about 60% of the applications reviewed so far are fraudulent. The investigation is ongoing, and we are coordinating with local police departments as needed.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Good morning, everyone. District Attorney Heather Adams. On Tuesday afternoon, I was contacted by Krista Miller who is our Chief Clerk of Elections regarding potentially fraudulent voter registration applications that had recently been received by her office. At that time, she informed me that the Elections Office received approximately 2,500 applications at or near the deadline for registering to vote. While preparing to process these applications, staff noticed that numerous applications appear to have the same handwriting, were filled out on the same day with unknown signatures, and some were previously registered voters excuse me and the signatures on file did not match the signatures on the application. So before I begin to summarize our preliminary findings I must remind everyone that this is an ongoing investigation and for that reason I will be limited in the details that I can provide. Lancaster County detectives, began investigating the voter registration applications and immediately found applications that were indeed fraudulent. Indicators of fraud included inaccuracies with the addresses listed on the applications, false personal identification information, as well as false names. A number of the applications also contained names that did not match the provided date of birth, driver's license number, and Social Security number. Date of birth, driver's license number and social security number. But the individuals listed on the applications informed detectives that they did not request the form, they did not complete the form and verified that the signature on the form was not theirs. At this point, it is believed that the fraudulent voter registrations are connected to a large scale canvassing operations for voter registrations that date back to June. However, the majority of the applications received are dated August 15th and after. Those canvassing for voter registrations were employed and paid to obtain voter registration applications. The majority of the applications were from residents in the city of Lancaster however applications were also received from residents in Columbia, Elizabethtown, Mount Joy, Akron, Ephrata, Stevens, Strasburg as well as other locations across Lancaster County. The canvases themselves took place at various shopping centers parking lots of grocery stores and businesses sidewalks and parks. During this preliminary investigation, detectives were able to, verify some of the applications were indeed legitimate. In these instances, the application the applicant verified that they did provide information to a canvasser. For these applications, we will immediately advise voter registration, and that we determined that 60% have been that we have completed, we have determined that 60% have been fraudulent. That is of the investigations that we've completed. We do have more, to do today. And my understanding is that voter registration is still going through the box of 2,500 but should be completed sometime here today. As I said the investigation is ongoing. We are aware of at least 2 other counties that receive similar applications that are currently being investigated. At this point we have confirmed violation of our crimes code as well as our, elections code. We have all available to TACTUS working on this. We are all hands on deck so that we can properly assess the validity of these applications in a timely manner. If needed we will request additional assistance from our local police departments.

@TheGrumpyGitPA - Jason Hatton

10/25/24 - Luzerne county, PA. Around the same time Canvassers dumped fraudulent applications on Lancaster, a former elections board member dumped a large number of applications...many dating back to August.

@ScottPresler - ThePersistence

SCOOP: ‼️Major Breaking Story‼️ At the most recent Luzerne County Board of Elections meeting, Manager Romilda Crocamo revealed that “Beth McBride dropped off and dumped a numerous amount of applications. Most of them were dated in June. They were delivered to the Bureau of Election on the last day of registration.” ➡️ Beth McBride was the acting Director of Elections when Luzerne County ‼️ran out of paper on Election Day in 2022‼️ Recently, Lancaster County uncovered a voter registration fraud operation: 2,500 applications (the majority of which are fraudulent) were turned in on or near the deadline — just like Luzerne — & are linked to an organization that began efforts in June. I am calling for an immediate investigation into the “numerous amount of applications” turned in to the Luzerne Bureau of Elections on Monday, October 21st. Contact Luzerne District Attorney Samuel M. Sanguedolce & demand that he investigate. The details mimic a current investigation in Lancaster County. After contacting the DA, contact your elected officials in the Pennsylvania State House & State Senate and demand they bring attention to this. How many other counties received a massive amount of voter registration applications on the deadline that are dated back to June? If we do not address these inconsistencies, Pennsylvania voters cannot have confidence in fair & free elections. Share this everywhere. CC: @Commish_Schmidt @PAStateDept @SamSanguedolce @RepMeuser @alecryncavage

@TheGrumpyGitPA - Jason Hatton

10/29/24 - Bucks county, PA. The deadline for on-demand, mail-in ballots was extended after video surfaced showing officials closing locations early.

@KyleJamesLive - Kyle James

@ScottPresler In Bucks County, PA, early voting lines were shut down hours early, keeping some people from voting. That wasn’t right. So, the GOP sued—and won! Now, there are 3 more days of early voting in Bucks County.

Video Transcript AI Summary

Hi, Martha. This situation is significant and complex. Bucks County is a crucial swing area in Pennsylvania. An injunction now allows voters to request on-demand mail-in ballots until 5 PM on Friday, extending the previous deadline. There was confusion as the original cutoff was 5 PM yesterday, but footage from the RNC shows lines being closed around 2:30 PM. Some voters reported being told that the deadline could be adjusted at any time. One voter expressed frustration, noting that the people waiting in line are there due to a lack of trust in the system.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Hi, Martha. Yeah. This is big. It's also very complicated. I mean, Bucks is one of the most critical swing counties, if not the most, in Pennsylvania. And according to this injunction that was just released, voters seeking to vote by on demand mail in ballot can now do so until 5 PM on Friday. Now the previous deadline was 5 PM yesterday. That's a process, that we're talking about here. It's unique to Pennsylvania counties. There was a lot of confusion because, again, the deadline was 5 PM, but the video that you're seeing from the RNC shows lines being cut off around 2:30 PM. Speaker 1: We just got up here, and they said they reserved the right to cut off the, the deadline any anytime they see fit. Speaker 2: When I was in line, I saw them come out with to close the line off. I understand this isn't a polling place, but you're not doing me a favor. The reason these people are here is because they don't trust the system.

@TheGrumpyGitPA - Jason Hatton

Update: The fraud discovered in Lancaster on 10/25/24 has also been found in three other counties. York, Monroe, and Cambria counties have reported fraud similar to what was found in Lancaster.

@ZitoSalena - ZitoSalena

Monroe County District Attorney said the fraudulent voter registration forms were traced to FieldCorps whose clients included Biden-Harris, Mark Kelly and Arizona Democrats. Calls to the number listed went unreturned and the FieldCorps website was mysteriously taken down.

@TheGrumpyGitPA - Jason Hatton

11/1/24 Bucks County, PA. Long lines, according to @JoeBiden, is a form of voter suppression. This was after Bucks County closed in-person voting early this week, resulting in a court ordering them to extend in-person voting 2 more days.

@PamelaProp35046 - Pamela Propson

I'm here in Levittown Bucks County they have a line of at least 200 or more. Some of them are truck drivers that want to vote now because they will be on the road Tuesday. @EarlyVoteAction @ScottPresler @JondavidRLongo Some have been here 3 different times to try to vote.

@TheGrumpyGitPA - Jason Hatton

11/1/24 Democrats in Luzerne County are alleging that some voters did not receive the mail-in ballots they requested.

@WNEP - WNEP

The county manager says the bureau received a list of people missing their requested mail-in ballot from the county's Democratic chairperson. https://www.wnep.com/article/news/local/luzerne-county/luzerne-county-election-officials-are-rechecking-records-after-alleged-missing-mail-in-ballots-politics/523-aa858a77-240c-42cb-a57f-b2908c7b5ae3

Luzerne County Election Officials are rechecking records after "alleged" missing mail-in ballots The county manager says the bureau received a list of people missing their requested mail-in ballot from the county's Democratic chairperson. wnep.com

@TheGrumpyGitPA - Jason Hatton

Here are two more videos of the lines/voter suppression in Bucks County.

@willchamberlain - Will Chamberlain

In Ron DeSantis’ Florida, I waited in line for only 30 minutes on the very first day of early voting, and that was as crowded as it would be In Josh Shapiro’s Pennsylvania, Republicans have to wait hours in line even after Dems were ORDERED to fix things https://x.com/cluny_b/status/1852468577170813429/video/1

@ScottPresler - ThePersistence

It’s after 7 p.m. & voters are STILL waiting for their ballots. Was this intentional in a county that we recently flipped from 🔵🔜🔴? 📍Levittown, PA 📍Bucks County

Video Transcript AI Summary

Hi, it's Heather with Early Boat Action at Quakertown. A boater here has to leave because of a long wait. They arrived at 3:15 and have been waiting for nearly three hours. The process has changed, and now it's taking about an hour to get their paperwork back. It's their daughter's birthday, and they have dinner reservations in New Jersey, so they can't stay in line. They plan to vote on Tuesday instead and hope the process goes smoothly then. They express appreciation for the staff, praising their professionalism and helpfulness during this experience. They hope to connect again under better circumstances.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Hi. It's Heather with Early Boat Action. We are here at Quakertown, and I have a boater who unfortunately cannot stay. You wanna tell me what happened? Well, we've been here since 3:15 at, at Quakertown. So we were told to fill out these papers, but now the process, we're we're getting up to the door, and the process is they just changed it where people are waiting an hour to get this back. And it's my daughter's birthday. She has dinner reservations in New Jersey, so we're not able to stay in line. Because if it's another hour, once we fill this out and give the ballot, then we have to stay and we can't vote on Tuesday. And there's people still waiting on the other side that were here, like, way before we were because the neighbors of ours moved out. So How long have you been here? We've been here since 3:15, and it's, what, 6 now? So 3 hours, just about 3 hours. So and, unfortunately, we can't we can't stay here because she's gotta be somewhere. So there's there's nothing that, that we can do to to hang out here. So we will go vote on Tuesday. Absolutely. I just hope that the process is flawless on Tuesday. You know? But it's just nice to have you. It's just really nice to have you. Thank you, Paul. Absolutely. Absolutely. You guys are professional. Like, I can't say enough nice things about you guys doing that. You're awesome. Wonderful experience with all of you. You you can't do enough. You're helpful. You're you're energetic. You're keeping everybody cutting pizza. You're you're doing all of it. So Thank you. Kudos to you guys that it's a wonderful organization. So Thank you. Hopefully, we'll be able to have contact with you guys again on a more positive more positive note. Hopefully, Trump gets it open. Absolutely.

@TheGrumpyGitPA - Jason Hatton

11/5/24 Scanning machines are down in Bedford, Cambria, Sommerset, and Clearfield Counties.

@Maloney - Cliff Maloney

REPORT: BEDFORD, CAMBRIA, CLEARFIELD, and SOMERSET scanning machines are down STAY IN LINE FILL OUT YOUR BALLOT AND PLACE IN LOCKBOX THIS IS WHY YOU NEED TO VOTE EARLY... absolute incompetency happening on the ONE DAY that the majority of Trump voters vote STAY IN LINE!

@TheGrumpyGitPA - Jason Hatton

11/5/24 At least one polling location opened late in Luzerne County, and once it did open the staff struggled to get the machines working.

@WNEP - WNEP

Voting was delayed at precinct Luzerne County https://www.wnep.com/article/news/local/luzerne-county/polling-issues-in-luzerne-county-lafflin-borough-st-maria-goretti-church-hall-judge-of-elections-scanner-poll-workers/523-879c2441-3f2f-4327-8315-c399e2cc7ffe

Poll hours extended in part of Luzerne County As polls opened on Election Day, voters have already encountered issues casting their ballots in Luzerne County wnep.com

@TheGrumpyGitPA - Jason Hatton

1/5/24 Poll watchers in eight counties are being turned away.

@ChairmanWhatley - Michael Whatley

PENNSYLVANIA ELECTION INTEGRITY: Early this morning we learned that Republican poll watchers in Philadelphia, York, Westmoreland, Allegheny, Lehigh, Cambria, Wyoming, and Lackawanna Counties were being turned away. We deployed our roving attorneys, engaged with local officials, and can now report that all Republican poll watchers have been let into the building. We will keep fighting, keep winning, and keep sharing updates.

@TheGrumpyGitPA - Jason Hatton

11/5/24 Machines are down in Cambria county. Cambria was also mentioned with reports of fraud and poll watchers being turned away.

@EndWokeness - End Wokeness

Voting machines are down in deep red Cambria County, PA. STAY. IN. LINE.

@TheGrumpyGitPA - Jason Hatton

11/5/24 Alleghany County. One of two districts had the wrong paperwork, no poll book, and the judge showed up late.

@Brash_1 - Brandon 🇺🇸🥓🥃

Standing in line at my polling place. Poll worker just came out and announced that Allegheny County didn’t send the necessary paperwork for one of the 2 districts at this polling location and one of the necessary officials hasn’t shown up yet. They’re separating the 2 districts and allowing 1 district to vote. This is unacceptable. @ScottPresler

@TheGrumpyGitPA - Jason Hatton

11/5/24 Ward 3 in West Pittston suffered voting machine errors that delayed voting.

@WNEP - WNEP

Newswatch 16's Jack Culkin went to Luzerne County, where voters had a slow start on Tuesday. https://www.wnep.com/article/news/local/luzerne-county/voting-issues-in-luzerne-county-election-bureau-west-pittston-ward-2-judge-of-elections-pennsylvania-jack-culkin/523-73385798-adee-46ee-8c74-d7e94157e2ea

Voting machine error message to blame for delayed voting in part of Luzerne County Newswatch 16's Jack Culkin went to Luzerne County, where voters had a slow start on Tuesday wnep.com

@TheGrumpyGitPA - Jason Hatton

11/5/24 Electioneering by Harris poll watchers in Greensburg.

@JamesOKeefeIII - James O'Keefe

SPOTTED: Electioneering at Fire Station 3 Greensburg, PA, Polling Official Displaying "Team Kamala" Stickers Inside Place Where People are Voting

@TheGrumpyGitPA - Jason Hatton

11/5/24. @GovernorShapiro ignores everything that happened and declares it a "free and fair" election.

@GovernorShapiro - Governor Josh Shapiro

Thank you to our incredible team at the @PAStateDept, our 67 county Boards of Elections, and every election administrator and volunteer who's worked tirelessly for weeks to ensure today’s election is free, fair, safe, and secure. Because of your efforts, our democracy works. 🇺🇸

@TheGrumpyGitPA - Jason Hatton

@GovernorShapiro 11/5/24 Washington Township, PA.

@Breaking911 - Breaking911

CNN: A judge in Fayette County, Pennsylvania, has ordered a poll official in Washington Township to allow votes to be sent to the county election bureau for tabulation when voting ends “without a hand count or manual tabulation of the votes cast for any office.”

@TheGrumpyGitPA - Jason Hatton

@GovernorShapiro 11/5/24 Another video of the chaos in Cambria County, where machines were down.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

Resident Update from Swing State Cambria County, Pennsylvania Election Day Polls are down, Poll Workers “They're telling people is to fill out an emergency ballot, put it in this box, and they'll take it to the courthouse to be counted” “Hell no — It's crazy. This is madness.”

Video Transcript AI Summary

Ballots in Cambria County, Pennsylvania are down, and people are being told to fill out emergency ballots to be counted later. This situation is concerning. There's a lot of fear surrounding Trump’s potential victory, as many believe he is the best option for the country. The past four years have been problematic, with a president who seems unaware of key issues, including border control. There's skepticism about Kamala Harris's chances in the upcoming election. Overall, there's a sense of urgency to address these issues, and personal goals, like losing weight, are also on the mind.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Have you guys seen all the ballots in Cambria County, Pennsylvania are down? So what they're telling people is to fill out an emergency ballot, put it in this box, and they'll take it to the courthouse to be counted. Hell no. They better get those fixed. And here it goes, starting. No. Jesus will have his way. It's crazy. It's already starting. Okay. I'm sharing this. You guys should follow me on my Instagram. Go my Instagram is priscilla7905. Go follow me over there. I post a lot of stuff over there. It's already starting. It's crazy. It's crazy. This is madness. They are so scared of Trump winning because they know it's the best option for us. These last 4 years, we've had a president that has slept more than he's been awake. That's a problem. He didn't even know who was coming in and out of the borders. I'm surprised he knows who's coming in and out of his own house. It's a problem. We need to fix this. And if Kamada Harris I don't know what her name is. Kamada. Kamala. Whatever her name is. I don't care about her name. She's not gonna win. What I do know is I mean, if you come into the snack because I need to get down £2 in 3 days.

@TheGrumpyGitPA - Jason Hatton

@GovernorShapiro 11/5/24 Bellafonte County. Polling location was evacuated after being stormed by "disrupters."

@MailOnline - Daily Mail Online

Pennsylvania voting site evacuated as 'disruptors' storm building https://trib.al/z0SpNVf

SocialFlow trib.al

@nomandatesco — 𝕊𝕔𝕒𝕣𝕪 𝔼𝕝𝕖𝕔𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟 𝔻𝕖𝕟𝕚𝕖𝕣 🇺🇸

Posted - November 6, 2024 at 2:03 AM

Saved - November 6, 2024 at 2:14 AM

@nomandatesco - 𝕊𝕔𝕒𝕣𝕪 𝔼𝕝𝕖𝕔𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟 𝔻𝕖𝕟𝕚𝕖𝕣 🇺🇸

WHAT THE HECK‼️‼️ AP called Maryland for Kamala… but their own numbers show Trump has more votes… at 1% reporting TRUMP IS AHEAD IN MARYLAND AND THEY CALLED IT FOR KAMALA—CHEATING‼️‼️‼️ #Election2024 https://t.co/ADrnpCffrh

@BoLoudon — Bo Loudon

Posted - November 6, 2024 at 4:21 AM

Saved - November 6, 2024 at 4:38 AM

@BoLoudon - Bo Loudon

🚨BREAKING: It's been 80 MINUTES since polls in Nevada closed. Despite this, there's not a single vote reported. WHAT'S GOING ON?

@MendlovitzMark — Mark Mendlovitz

Posted - November 8, 2024 at 12:18 AM

Saved - November 8, 2024 at 3:56 PM

@MendlovitzMark - Mark Mendlovitz

Marc Elias is trying to steal Pennsylvania's Senate victory by Dave McCormick. After days of showing Pennsylvania has 95% or more of the ballots in, it's now showing 84%. Suddenly new ballots have appeared in Philadelphia! Isn't that amazing?

@Real_RobN — 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

Posted - May 17, 2025 at 6:22 PM

Saved - May 19, 2025 at 1:50 AM

@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

Your government was effectively overthrown on November 3, 2020, after six swing states stopped counting simultaneously on election night. https://t.co/uEfemZBYsR

@realDonaldTrump - Donald J. Trump

“REPORT: DOMINION DELETED 2.7 MILLION TRUMP VOTES NATIONWIDE. DATA ANALYSIS FINDS 221,000 PENNSYLVANIA VOTES SWITCHED FROM PRESIDENT TRUMP TO BIDEN. 941,000 TRUMP VOTES DELETED. STATES USING DOMINION VOTING SYSTEMS SWITCHED 435,000 VOTES FROM TRUMP TO BIDEN.” @ChanelRion @OANN