reSee.it - Related Post Feed

Posted - December 31, 2022 at 1:46 AM

Saved - June 16, 2023 at 3:09 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

Beliefs must predict future outcomes. My beliefs were shown to me by force. Religion was required to state an opinion not in line with mainstream narrative. Something was wrong, so I dove down the rabbit hole. The numbers were not real. It was never about party politics. China had a 100% positive outcome if they influenced the American election. Spread the desire to find the truth.

@RealReaperCEO - PATRICK L. RILEY 🇺🇲

A wise man once told me that a system of beliefs is validated only by it's ability to predict future outcomes. My beliefs were not chosen, they were shown to me by force. I understand this is not everyone's cup of tea. Keep reading, this is not about 'Q'. Save America. (1/25)

@RealReaperCEO - PATRICK L. RILEY 🇺🇲

In-order-to state an opinion not in line with mainstream narrative, the 'cover and camouflage' of Religion was required. I had to appear sane enough to present information, and insane enough to not be taken as a significant threat. (2/25)

@RealReaperCEO - PATRICK L. RILEY 🇺🇲

Like most people, I could not help but feel something was significantly wrong. I dove down the 'rabbit hole'. (3/25)

@RealReaperCEO - PATRICK L. RILEY 🇺🇲

As stated, it is unlikely there was anyone in the U.S. military who was better positioned to see the onset in Real-Time. By matter-of-fact, the numbers were not real. (4/25)

@RealReaperCEO - PATRICK L. RILEY 🇺🇲

There are sources for everything, but don't take my word for it or dismiss it before you do your own research. (5/25)

@RealReaperCEO - PATRICK L. RILEY 🇺🇲

What was so important to the Democrats that they had to get rid of Trump? It was never about party politics. Plenty of Republicans are also compromised. (6/25)

@RealReaperCEO - PATRICK L. RILEY 🇺🇲

How deep in bed with China are they Really? Are China and the Democratic Party still two separate entities? (7/25)

@RealReaperCEO - PATRICK L. RILEY 🇺🇲

China had a 100% positive outcome if they influenced the American election, and a high chance of decline if they did not unseat @realDonaldTrump (8/25)

@RealReaperCEO - PATRICK L. RILEY 🇺🇲

The approval authority for this appeal was the Surgeon General and appeal authority was the Deputy Secretary of the Army, both Appointed by Joseph R. Biden. (9/25)

@RealReaperCEO - PATRICK L. RILEY 🇺🇲

Let me be clear, this is not an endorsement of Trump, nor am I releasing this as a call for any extreme action. I only ask that our Military still in uniform finds the personal courage to honor their Oaths. (10/25)

@RealReaperCEO - PATRICK L. RILEY 🇺🇲

Every Commander in the Chain-of-command that saw this request + supporting enclosures had a duty to start an investigation, not on the assumption I am correct but based on the accusation. At no time did I receive any feedback, refutation, nor confirmation of my concerns. (11/25)

@RealReaperCEO - PATRICK L. RILEY 🇺🇲

If there was an official investigation, I was never informed of one as is required by regulation. There was a mere suggestion that this had been forwarded to 'appropriate authorities'. I must wonder if those authorities include the FBI, the CIA, the State Department. (12/25)

@RealReaperCEO - PATRICK L. RILEY 🇺🇲

The fact is we know that multiple three-letter agencies have shown an overwhelming bias, media has proven over-whelming bias, and the military's system of checks and balances failed to take a verifiable threat to national security seriously. (13/25)

@RealReaperCEO - PATRICK L. RILEY 🇺🇲

We should probably ask @elon to look into the Democrat silencing of this first enclosure. The same people who shut down #HunterBidensLaptop had the same means when this was released... (14/25)

@RealReaperCEO - PATRICK L. RILEY 🇺🇲

It requires two people to lie, one to tell it and one to accept it as the truth; the American decline only stops when we stop swallowing the lies. (15/25)

@RealReaperCEO - PATRICK L. RILEY 🇺🇲

Note that this is not just glancing association. The @HouseGOP has started an investigation into the Biden family's Chinese and Ukrainian Money schemes: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bXX62XCVl_I&list=FLz_sCNOVGWOZ4_qMKYBNpFA&index=3 (16/25)

@RealReaperCEO - PATRICK L. RILEY 🇺🇲

If you're here because of $XRP, yes, this ties in. BRICS (China) backed-Dems are the higher power pushing the SEC to prevent $XRP adoption in the U.S. Gary was HRC's CFO, MIT Prof, SBF Laundering connected. (17/25)

@RealReaperCEO - PATRICK L. RILEY 🇺🇲

Hunter and Joe shared bank accounts. Hunter working with Big Oil and Bio-Labs in Ukraine, while joe took 10% ownership in Chinese Energy. Still wondering why gas is expensive again? (18/25)

@RealReaperCEO - PATRICK L. RILEY 🇺🇲

In fact, as stated earlier, Biden's farce election is what prompted the invasion of Ukraine. His ties to Ukraine were as much of an immediate threat to Russia as they are to us now. (19/25)

@RealReaperCEO - PATRICK L. RILEY 🇺🇲

Perhaps the Party of Slavery that started the first Civil War, founded the KKK and Planned Parenthood, rescued and empowered Nazi's in Operation Paperclip, assassinated JFK and MLK and now founds terrorist organizations like Antifa was never interested in "We The People". (20/25)

@RealReaperCEO - PATRICK L. RILEY 🇺🇲

Have I said too much? Taken liberties? I have barely scratched the surface. Wait until you learn what was well known by the government about the bloodlines from Paperclip. (21/25)

@RealReaperCEO - PATRICK L. RILEY 🇺🇲

Wait until you learn the truth about Liberia, ISIS, Iraq and Afghanistan. (22/25)

@RealReaperCEO - PATRICK L. RILEY 🇺🇲

If you are an American, I am sorry to shatter the bubble of those who were unaware, this is no longer (if it ever was) the country you believe it to be. (23/25)

@RealReaperCEO - PATRICK L. RILEY 🇺🇲

What I ask of you is to spread not this information but the desire to find the truth. My doubts in this government were so great that I chose to throw away 16 years of my commitment to the Army just so I could tell you this. (24/25)

@RealReaperCEO - PATRICK L. RILEY 🇺🇲

There are an additional 53 pages to this report. I will be posting more in the coming days and months. I do not know 100% that I am correct, but I've given 16 years of my life, I want more than a biased dismissal of facts. (25/25)

@RealReaperCEO - PATRICK L. RILEY 🇺🇲

@JKcryptobaron We just begin.

@RealReaperCEO - PATRICK L. RILEY 🇺🇲

@CryptFaq PM me an email address

@RealReaperCEO - PATRICK L. RILEY 🇺🇲

@DarenJ66 https://drive.proton.me/urls/H5DNJ4J6H8#h88sJddsuFbX

Proton Drive Proton Drive allows you to securely store and share your sensitive documents and access them anywhere. drive.proton.me

@RealReaperCEO - PATRICK L. RILEY 🇺🇲

@MarySmi78538413 ~80-90%

@RealReaperCEO - PATRICK L. RILEY 🇺🇲

@ThinkPolOfficer I haven't yet, legal reasons.

@listen_2learn — The Researcher

Posted - March 8, 2023 at 2:38 AM

Saved - December 2, 2024 at 1:34 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

The CIA has never truly functioned as a central intelligence agency; instead, it acts as the covert action arm for the President's foreign policy advisers. Its role includes supporting or overthrowing foreign governments while crafting intelligence to justify these actions. Disinformation plays a significant part in its operations, targeting the American public with misleading narratives. The discussion on the CIA's role in disinformation and media infiltration continues, and I’ve shared a video link for further insights.

@listen_2learn - The Researcher

“The CIA is not now nor has it ever been a central intelligence agency. It is the covert action arm of the President's foreign policy advisers. In that capacity it overthrows or supports foreign governments while reporting "intelligence" justifying those activities. It shapes its intelligence, even in such critical areas as Soviet nuclear weapon capability, to support presidential policy. Disinformation is a large part of its covert action responsibility, and the American people are the primary target audience of its lies." Part 1 👀

Video Transcript AI Summary

Many people misunderstand the CIA's role, believing it primarily gathers intelligence. In reality, it functions as a covert action agency, focusing on overthrowing or supporting foreign governments and conducting disinformation campaigns, particularly targeting the American public. The CIA develops relationships with the press through various means, including direct contacts and planting propaganda. While some journalists may knowingly publish CIA-favored articles, others may do so unknowingly. In Vietnam, the CIA created the Diem regime and used the press to promote an illusion of its legitimacy. During that time, the press and government often cooperated closely, viewing the CIA as a trustworthy entity. The CIA also established a system, referred to as Wiesner's Wurlitzer, to influence media narratives globally, with current efforts focused on rebuilding its covert operations and penetrating various institutions.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: A good many of us do not have a clear picture of what the CIA does. I think many of us believe it is an intelligence gathering agency that it gets information, that information becomes intelligence, and then it passes it on to key areas in the government. Is that an accurate impression? Speaker 1: No. It isn't. It's my view, and it's supportable by all the, evidence we can see in the church committee report, the pipe committee report, and, other collateral information. The CIA is not an intelligence agency. It's a covert action agency, covert action being overthrowing or supporting foreign governments. Another part of covert action is disinformation, and the, American people, in my estimation, are the primary target audience of the agency's disinformation operation. And I view Vietnam, the entire Vietnam War was brought to us, sold to us, by agency disinformation operations. That's the when I say us, I mean the American people. Speaker 0: Well, that had to be done, of course, through the press. Yes. How else would one reach the the American public? Well, how does the CI the CIA how does the CIA develop its relationship with the press? Speaker 1: Well, it happens on many levels in many different ways. It could be a a, director of agency, contact with the publisher, or it could be a lower level agency employee with a lower level person or managing editor, per se, or it could be hiring, agent people, agency people and placing them in the news, organization or it could be giving information to a reporter and winning his goodwill. It could be just a friendship sort of basis. It sort of covers the scheme of relationships that you can have, you know, in any social situation. Speaker 0: This relationship demands participation on the Speaker 1: part of the press, Speaker 0: though, does it not? Of course. Well, how does it participate? Speaker 1: It can participate in many ways. It can, publish articles that the agency wants published. Speaker 0: Knowingly publish it because the CIA wants it done Speaker 1: or unknowingly? Well, both. Knowingly, most of the time, I would guess. And sometimes the information is passed to a reporter as valid information, a good scoop, if you will, when it's just a planted propaganda. So the agency uses the press in numerous ways to achieve its, what I call, illusion building properties. Speaker 0: When you were, with the CIA in Vietnam, did you have any direct connection with the press? Speaker 1: No. I didn't. I do know of the case of the, the press in Saigon in the early fifties, where they were meeting directly with Colonel Lansdale, 5 members of the most prestigious newspapers in the United States, were meeting with Colonel Lansdale, the agency's man in Saigon. Speaker 0: How often would they meet? Speaker 1: Quite frequently. I don't know the exact frequency. But you will look at the press coverage for that era, and you'll find no mention of agency activities in the press. Yet the agency was totally responsible for the creation of the DM regime. It, it created the DM regime. It, built an illusion about the DM regime, and it used the press to sell the illusion to the United States, the illusion that lives lives on today in the United States. Speaker 0: Do you think that those 5 members of whom you speak had any idea that they were being used? Speaker 1: You have to the atmosphere of those days where the press and the government were so in tune on the, the issues that I I believe the it was it was a very much a cooperative effort more than a a using effort. The press viewed the situation, as the government did and and both cooperated in in putting across the stories. Speaker 0: The CIA was a were good folks to which one could be associated? Was that what you're saying at that time? Speaker 1: At that time, yes. Speaker 0: Yes. Uh-huh. Speaker 1: Of course, the agency developed what they called, Wiesner's Wurlitzer. That was, what they call an organ that he could play any any tune he wanted anywhere in the world at any time. Supposedly, they had 1 they owned 1 newspaper in any country of the world, and whatever articles they want run, whatever themes that they wanted to propagate, all they had to do was just press the right buttons and that that, those articles and and themes would would come up in those countries. I think we'd like to know who Wizzner was. Wizzner was a former deputy chief of the operations branch of the CIA. Speaker 0: And he created the world itself? Speaker 1: He created the world itself. And we find now, this came under the corporate action staff of the agency. And from recent information, William Casey is concentrating all his efforts in rebuilding the agency in developing the corporate action staff. That's the staff that that, develops in international organizations, international press organizations, international organizations of all types that, penetrates press, religious, academic, institutions, here here at home and abroad. This is where he's concentrating the the rebuilding effort.

@listen_2learn - The Researcher

The CIA, disinformation, and media infiltration continued. https://t.co/1FOOT3zwdm

Video Transcript AI Summary

The CIA's objective in spreading disinformation is to create an international anti-communist ideology, justifying actions like overthrowing governments in places like Nicaragua by linking them to larger threats. While some high-level officials may be aware of these operations, many in the State Department are often kept in the dark. The agency employs various forms of propaganda—white, gray, and black—to manipulate narratives. Although covert actions are being rebuilt under current leadership, manipulating the press today is more challenging due to increased skepticism among journalists and the public. While it would be difficult to sell another war like Vietnam, it remains possible with a sustained effort.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Why does the CIA do this? What is the objective of the CIA when they put out disinformation, when they, you might say, co opt the the press? One function of Speaker 1: the agency is is noted by the, church committee is to create an international anti communist ideology. Well, it's my thesis. The reason you wanna create this international anti communist ideology so that when you go down to Nicaragua and you wanna overthrow the government of Nicaragua, well, you have you can't justify to the American people going down there and overthrowing that government unless you can link it to a greater threat. It's just a little insignificant nation. But if you can link it to a greater threat, then you're justified in overthrowing it. And that's exactly what's happening in Nicaragua. It's it's not the Nicaraguans fighting to sustain, the way of life that they want. It's the Cubans or the Soviets or the Soviets and Cubans who are supporting this regime, and we have to we are therefore by working against the Nicaraguan government, we are actually, thwarting the the plans of the Soviet Union. That justifies our actions in that country. Speaker 0: Do you think the state department was part and parcel to the CIA plan, or was the State Department taken in by the CIA? Speaker 1: I think at the very highest levels of government, the National Security Council that directs the agency, the probably a very small clique of people knew about it, but certainly at the working levels of the State Department, even Daniel Ellsberg, who I've talked to recently, said he had no idea that he worked on the FOID paper. He had no idea that this was based on an agency COVID operation. Now this is just one example of, you know, thousands that could be brought up. The agency routinely Speaker 0: Tell me another one, then. Do what? You were talking about the Speaker 1: Some I can't talk about. I'm afraid I just can't I mean, under security restrictions not to. But look at the white paper in El Salvador. It was based on the discovery of communist documents, in El Salvador. And, supposedly, a leader of a small communist movement had gone around to, Vietnam and gone to West Germany, the PLO, all our presumed enemies in the world, and they had all promised to support him. This document was discovered all at once just as Reagan was taking office, and this would, form the basis of a white paper on El Salvador. And many critics have pointed out the the obvious fallacies within the white paper and the obvious forgery that it was. That's another one, and there are examples of doctor photographs that I can't talk about. And the planting of articles is a routine. It's almost it's a daily thing that goes on. You have a theme that has developed, the anti communist ideology, which you constantly are planting articles in newspapers in one country. You pick it up and replay it in another country and you use the techniques of white, gray and black propaganda. What's that mean? White propaganda is more or less a US government statement. Everybody recognizes it as such. Gray propaganda is a statement the sourcing is not quite clear. It's fuzzed up. Black propaganda would be if the agency would put out something, say, from the Communist Party of China and make it appear authentic. One good example of this, during the Cultural Revolution in China, the agency, through its radio transmitters on Taiwan, would would come in at the tail end of, radio broadcast mainland radio broadcast, and they would pretend that they were just continuations of the program. And they would say, well, the situation is terrible in China. You know? There's a uproar, the upheaval of the Cultural Revolution. Well, there's a there's sort of a playback on this and that the agency, foreign broadcast information service, was picking up those broadcasts, and they thought this information to be authentic. And they were disseminating it to the intelligence community, and the intelligence community was saying estimating the situation based on agency, disinformation. Speaker 0: Let's, let's pin down something you said a moment ago. Does this covert action exist in the CIA today as greatly as it did in the past? Speaker 1: As I understand, the the covert action staff is being rebuilt on a massive scale, that director William Casey is concentrating all his efforts in rebuilding this staff. And, we can assume that it's operating again in academia, in the press, in the religious groups, in international groups, in labor, youth, students. If it isn't now, it will soon will be. Speaker 0: In your opinion, is the press manipulated as much today as in the past? Speaker 1: I don't think it's as possible to manipulate the press as much today as was in the past. The press is much more skeptical, as are the American people in general. It'd be more difficult to do it, yet I'm I'm sure that in some areas, of course, it is being manipulated. Speaker 0: I think you've answered my question in part already, but the public, in your opinion, cannot be hoodwinked as easily as they as they were in the past. Is that what you're saying? Speaker 1: Right. I don't think they can be hoodwinked as easily. However, some of the illusions of the past continue, and one of those illusions is what the Vietnam War was all about. Well, do Speaker 0: you think with the manipulation of the press, which you have explained and which you believe still goes on to a degree, do you think another war such as Vietnam could be sold Speaker 1: to the American people? Not nearly so easily. I think it could be done, but it would take a more sustained effort, more across the board effort. I think there's a lot of skepticism out there and it would be very difficult to sell, but it could be done.

@listen_2learn - The Researcher

Link to video. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Vx_2L_eYVjU

@Vltra_MK — Michael Rae Khoury

Posted - July 19, 2023 at 11:48 AM

Saved - July 23, 2023 at 5:31 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

The CIA, often seen as a patriotic organization, may not be what it seems. Queen Elizabeth's jealousy led to the creation of privateering, a legal form of piracy. Later, her pirate network transformed into the East India Company. Jewish bankers, facing prejudice, became court factors for royals. Indirect assassinations were outsourced to criminal proxies like Emma Goldman. The CIA was built on ruthless tactics taught by British intelligence. The British Empire captured the US government under the guise of a counterintelligence partnership. Admiralty Law enables black ops by granting authority to military leaders. Prominent Americans like MLK and Malcolm X were assassinated by MI6. JFK's assassination remains secret due to Crown involvement. False flags and Operation Northwoods were used to start wars. The CIA and MI6 arm and fund terrorist organizations worldwide. Criminal organizations provide funding for the CIA's illegal activities. US wars in Afghanistan and Vietnam fueled the global heroin trade. The CIA intentionally flooded black neighborhoods with crack cocaine. The royal family still holds power.

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

< Black Ops 101 > The Dark Truth About the CIA ☠️ FULL THREAD 🧵 Many people think that the CIA is a patriotic organization that protects Americans from danger, and informs the President about what's happening in the world so he can make good decisions. But that couldn't be…

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

How It Started: Queen Elizabeth Gets Jealous In the 1500s, Spain was getting rich colonizing America, and the original Queen Elizabeth was feeling left behind. So she authorized a practice called “privateering”, which is essentially a legal version of piracy - where she would…

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

Reorganized Queen Elizabeth's pirate racket gets reorganized into a ruthless corporation: The East India Company After they defeated the Spanish Armada, the Queen reorganized her savage horde of pirates into the East India Company, which royals then used as the primary vehicle…

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

Reorganized Around Oligarchs Jewish Banking Oligarchs Christians were banned from becoming bankers in medieval Europe - so all banking was run by Jews. Royals used Jews as their "court factors" (aka chief bankers), because they were a small minority who faced extreme prejudice…

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

Masters of Indirect Assassinations Assassinations are much easier to keep secret when they are outsourced to criminal proxies. Emma Goldman was a criminal proxy (British intelligence asset) who led a worldwide movement of anarchists. Based out of London and funded by Banking…

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

Creating the CIA OSS = CIA During WW2, British intelligence (MI6) came over and built the OSS from the ground up - teaching the Americans the ruthless tactics they had been using for centuries. In 1947, OSS was reorganized into the CIA. Admirals Duped Military leaders saw…

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

Deal With The Devil Secret Partnership, Catastrophic Results Under the sneaky guise of a "counterintelligence partnership," the British Empire directly captures the US government, and uses it to further it's imperial ambitions across the globe. Unholy Alliance Since the…

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

Legal Logistics Black Ops Enabled By: Admiralty Law ⚓️ Admiralty Law was created centuries ago, before it was possible for military leaders deployed overseas to call their commander-in-chief and ask permission for things. So it gives Admirals the authority to order strikes and…

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

Assassinating Americans Royal Death Racket Prominent Americans deemed "counterintelligence threats" and assassinated by MI6: MLK Malcom X Robert Kenenedy

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

"They still won't release the JFK documents, 60 years later, because the assassination was ordered through the Crown. Meaning it can legally be kept secret forever."

Video Transcript AI Summary

Speaker 0: I need your help to inform and alert the American people. Senator Kennedy has been shot. Speaker 1: On February 28th, the ATF learned that Koresh knew they were coming but proceeded anyway. Speaker 0: 911, there's been an explosion. We need to backtrack for a better view. Defending freedom in dangerous times is our responsibility. We welcome it. Our energy and devotion will light up our country and those who serve it.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: I am asking your help in the tremendous task of informing and alerting the American people. I'm leading to the left. I got my head in the lap. Oh, Lord, I've been willing to some kind of a trap. Senator Kennedy has been shot. Is that possible? Is that possible? It is possible. He has not only senator Kennedy. Oh my God. Senator Kennedy has been shot. Speaker 1: February 28th, minutes before setting out on The ATF learned from an undercover agent that Koresh knew they were coming. They didn't turn back. Speaker 0: 911, what's your emergency? Has been blown away. We'll have to backtrack the other side so I can get a better view of it. The explosion now In the long history of the world, only a few generations have been granted the role of defending freedom in its hour of maximum danger. I do not shrink from this responsibility. I I welcome it. I do not believe that any of us would exchange places with any other people or any other generation. The energy, the faith, the devotion which we bring to this endeavor will light our country and all who serve it and the glow

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

Lying to Start Wars False Flags are murderous stunts that the CIA and military uses to trick the public into being okay with their racket wars: Gulf Of Tonkin The US Military knowingly lied to us about being attacked by North Vietnamese boats, and then used the lie to start the…

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

Operation Northwoods In the early 1960s, America's top military leaders reportedly drafted plans to kill innocent people and commit acts of terrorism in U.S. cities to create public support for a war against Cuba. Code named Operation Northwoods, the plans reportedly included the…

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

Arming Militants Most of the terrorist organizations on earth are funded and armed by D6 (the covert paramilitary wing of the CIA) & MI6: Mujahadeen in Afghanistan Drug Cartels in Central America ISIS & al-Nusra in Syria Neo-Nazis in Ukraine

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

Funding Sources Black-Ops Money Funding for the CIA's illegal rackets can't come from Congress (because if it did, there would be a paper trail). So the CIA makes deals with criminal organizations and uses that money to arm terrorists, kill people, rig elections, and manipulate…

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

World's Biggest Drug Dealers Opium (aka Heroin) Places the United States goes to war (i.e Afghanistan & Vietnam) end up becoming the world's biggest heroin producers: Vietnam & Laos During the Vietnam War, Vietnam and Laos became the world's leading producer of heroin. It…

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

Responsible for: Crack Epidemic The Black Community has known for decades how the CIA (via their MI6 proxies) intentionally flooded black neighborhoods with highly addictive crack-cocaine. At the time, they were widely dismissed as conspiracy theorists, but over the last decade,…

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

Royals still rule us Thread: https://t.co/SGen87qirP

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

LIVE Twitter Spaces - Black Ops 101 - 1PM EST https://t.co/a7UUyoyUYS

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

Set a reminder for my upcoming Space! https://t.co/rS5jYscLnp

@WarClandestine — Clandestine

Posted - August 2, 2023 at 7:03 PM

Saved - August 7, 2023 at 2:29 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

The J6 riot was staged to certify a stolen election. Mass mail-in voting, due to a pandemic caused by a human-engineered pathogen, allowed the election to be stolen. Hunter owns a biolab company in Ukraine that studied bat coronaviruses. Joe Biden, with Hunter as proxy, owns the biolab company. Biden won the election due to fraud enabled by the pathogen his own biolab studied. The media lied about the biolabs in Ukraine, Trump's impeachment, and Biden's support for Ukraine. Zelensky burned docs related to US biolab companies. The Deep State released a biological weapon to steal the election and establish a biomedical police state. This is the most sinister crime against humanity. The mission is to make these demons pay.

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

J6 was a staged riot so the Deep State could certify a stolen election. But what allowed them to steal the election? Mass mail-in voting, due to a “pandemic”, due to a pathogen that was engineered by humans. Why does Hunter own a biolab company operating in Ukraine? Metabiota was studying bat coronaviruses as part of the USAID PREDICT program from 2014-2019. So essentially Joe Biden, with Hunter as proxy, owns a biolab company, that was studying bat coronaviruses in Ukraine for the 5 years leading up to the release of SARS-CoV-2. Then Joe wins the election, due to fraud, made possible by the human-engineered pathogen, that his own biolab company was studying. Is it starting to make sense now? Is it starting to make sense why the media freaked out and blatantly lied to you about the existence of the biolabs in Ukraine? Why they impeached Trump when he started looking into Ukraine? Why Biden sent hundreds of billions of our tax dollars to defend Ukraine? Why Zelensky ordered his military to burn all docs associated with US biolab companies Metabiota and Battelle? The Deep State created a biological weapon and released it on the world to steal the 2020 Presidential election and establish the biomedical police state. It’s the most sinister crime ever perpetrated on humanity, and the mission never ceases until these demons pay for what they’ve done.

Video Transcript AI Summary

What if the worst biological attack in our country's history wasn't carried out by the individuals who were caught, confessed, and executed? There are coincidences that make me question if someone else unleashed the virus and killed all those people. Would you want to know who it was, even if it was someone working for our government? That's my question. If our own government was responsible for the deaths of almost 100,000 people at St. Mary's and Three Waters.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: What if the worst, the most horrifying biological attack in this country's history Speaker 1: Well, I don't understand. We know it was. They were caught. They confessed. Speaker 0: And they were executed, I know. And maybe that's really what happened. But I see this chain of events, These coincidences and I have to ask, what if that isn't what happened? What if someone else unleashed that virus? What if someone else killed all those people. Would you really want to know who it was? Sure. Even if it was someone working for this government. That's my question. If our normal government was responsible for what happened at St. Mary's and Three Waters. If our own government was responsible for the deaths of almost 100,000 people.

@bennyjohnson — Benny Johnson

Posted - October 26, 2023 at 9:25 PM

Saved - October 27, 2023 at 4:01 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

The FBI halted investigations into the alleged $10 million bribe by the Bidens to Ukraine and 17 audio recordings of Biden's criminal activity. Simultaneously, the FBI planted information against Trump and circulated a fake dossier to undermine him. This suggests a larger scheme: a corrupt politician was elected to defeat Trump, who had exposed the FBI and attempted to dismiss their director. It appears that the FBI is seeking revenge on Trump through their association with Biden.

@bennyjohnson - Benny Johnson

The FBI shut down an investigation into the Biden’s $10 million bribe to Ukraine. And the FBI shut down an investigation into 17 audio recordings of Biden criminal activity. Meanwhile, the FBI actively planted information against Trump. And the FBI disseminated a fake dossier to sabotage Trump. Do you see what’s going on? They got a dirty politician elected so they could defeat Trump, because he exposed the FBI and tried to fire their director. The FBI is using Biden to get revenge on Trump.

@Vltra_MK — Michael Rae Khoury

Posted - November 14, 2023 at 12:39 PM

Saved - November 14, 2023 at 2:06 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

The article explores various interconnected topics, including the influence of royal families, the dark truth about the CIA, the global banking cartel, and suspicious corporate acquisitions. It highlights the power of the royal bloodline, their control over key European countries, and their alleged manipulation of intelligence agencies. The article also delves into the CIA's covert activities, such as rigging elections and overthrowing governments. It touches upon the Federal Reserve, bankruptcy declarations, and the impact on individual rights. Additionally, it mentions the connection between Hillary Clinton's email server and Crown corporations, as well as the involvement of Google executives in war crimes. The article aims to shed light on these complex issues in a concise manner.

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

All of Prince Philip’s sisters married Nazis 🪃 Here’s the late Queen Elizabeth II with her uncle Edward — King Edward the VIII (also head of the Church of England) just doing what Fake British-German Nazi’s do 👀 1933 — So many Royal coincidences suddenly coming to light… ☀️

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

"How Britain Started the Arab-Israeli Conflict" 👀 This is a must-watch with all that's happening... 💯 (suggested at 1.5x speed)

Video Transcript AI Summary

The conflict between Arabs and Jews in the Middle East has its roots in British double dealing during World War I. The British made conflicting promises to both the Arabs and the Jews, leading to a legacy of bloodshed and suffering. The secret Sykes-Picot Agreement divided the region into French and British spheres of influence, while the Balfour Declaration promised support for a Jewish homeland in Palestine. These actions, along with the imposition of mandates and restrictions on Arab immigration, fueled tensions and led to the establishment of the state of Israel in 1948. The consequences of British policy during the war continue to shape the Middle East today.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: The bitter struggle between Arab and Jew for control of the Holy Land has caused untold suffering in the Middle East for generations. It is often claimed that the crisis originated with Jewish immigration to Palestine and the foundation of the state Yet the roots of the conflict are to be found much earlier, In British double dealing during the First World War. This is a story of intrigue among rival empires, of misguided strategies and of how conflicting promises to Arab and Jew created a legacy of bloodshed which has determined the fate of the Middle East. Speaker 1: During the First World War, the British, the French, and the Russians had these secret plans to carve up the Ottoman Empire, because they believed that would balance out their imperial ambitions, but tough luck for the Turks, the Arabs, and anyone else who got in the way. Speaker 2: Certainly, all the seeds were planted then in the sense that it was the British who promised the Arabs independence on the one hand And, a Jewish homeland on the other, and you could not simply reconcile one With the other, Speaker 3: the British scattered promises to anyone who might be of some use To them without thinking about the consequences. So British duplicity, British double dealing went a long way to perpetuate the conflict in Palestine. Speaker 4: At the end of the day, when you're fighting a war, you are very liberal in what you're offering in terms of a post war settlement. When you get down to the conference table when the war has ended and you have to start honoring your agreements, you then have to decide what's in your interest or not, and it puts all the Middle East as a western flag for their power in India and their power in Asia in general. Speaker 0: The story of Britain's involvement in the Middle East and the ensuing struggle between Arab and Jew begins with her colonial past. At the beginning of 20th century, King Edward the 7th ruled over a vast empire with interests in every part Speaker 4: of the world. India became increasingly important because it was the 2nd pillar of British power in the world. Moving the Indian Army about was extremely important in extending British interests and British influence across the globe. And the Suez Canal was, of course, the quick way To do that, it's very important for the British shared geopolitical position to ensure the Suez Canal remains safe and secure. Speaker 0: With this aim in mind, Britain had become the only European power to establish a major foothold in the Middle East, in the principalities around the Persian Gulf, in Aden, and in Egypt. Britain had annexed Egypt from Turkey's Ottoman Empire in 18 82. And by the time it was made a protectorate in 1914, Cairo had become the center of British power in the Middle East. The presence of imperial troops in the region was of vital strategic importance. For the Ottoman Empire under Sultan Mohammed But the 5th was an alliance with Britain's much feared rival, Germany. Together with the Austro Hungarian Empire, these countries made up the Central Powers and pitted against them were the 3 allies, Britain, France and Russia. From the Ottoman capital, Constantinople in Turkey. The sultan ruled over the last of the great Islamic empires. It had been an almost terminal decline for decades. Yet the fate of the Ottoman Empire was to be sealed by the outbreak of the First World War in August 1914. In Europe, Germany's rapid advance was halted by Britain and France along the Austro front. In the east, Russia's war against Germany and Austria Hungary also reached deadlock. The powerful weapons of the industrial age were killing thousands of men in the trenches of every army. Speaker 5: All of the leading powers expected the war to be over within a matter of months. So in that sense, all of them are surprised at the end of 14, when not merely is the war going on, but it shows every sign of being likely to go on for a very long time. At that point, They began to think about new ways of winning the war. Speaker 0: Britain's prime minister, Asquith, felt that with the stalemate in Europe, it was essential to widen the conflict. Together with Foreign secretary, Lord Grey, minister for war, Lord Kitchener, and the first lord of the admiralty, Winston Churchill, they masterminded a complex strategy to undermine the Mine the central powers. Speaker 4: This was a global war, and the British saw the Middle East very much in a global context. The traditional British preference for sideshows, as people, unfavorably call it, the indirect strategy, The way of, attacking the soft underbelly, as Churchill called it, of the enemy. Speaker 0: And the soft underbelly was seen to be Turkey. Britain's secret plan involved, on the one hand, a military diversion, and on the other, a devious use of diplomacy through bribery, Subversion and double dealing, all these devices focused on the enemy's weakest link, Turkey's Ottoman Empire. Speaker 1: Diplomacy in general has always had a secret dimension to it. Whether where but where discretion ends and conspiracy begins is an open question. But during the period up to and during the First World War, there was a particularly intense set of negotiations and discussions between the major imperial powers, between the French, the Russians, and the British, in particular, cutting in the Italians as well about what would they do When the war was over and when the Ottoman Empire broke up. Speaker 0: The British government hoped that by striking a deal over the spoils of war, It would strengthen the alliance against the Central Powers. Amongst the allies, Russia had long sought access to the Mediterranean. In a secret treaty of March 1915, Britain and France offered What was to the czar a prize of vital geopolitical importance, Constantinople. Speaker 6: It is that key outlet into the wider world and into the Mediterranean. And it is the one thing, of course, the British and the French have been Attempting to prevent the Russians from achieving. So this is a complete This is this is the British, the French, and the Russians Coming to an agreement over something which was, up to this point, almost inconceivable. Speaker 0: Italy's King Vittoria Emmanuel is another target for bribery. Britain, France, and Russia tried to tempt Italy, a pro German state, to join the Allies. In April 1915, a secret treaty offered Italy a substantial bit of Ottoman real estate in Anatolia. Speaker 6: Again, it's another power coming into the equation and being offered territorial advancement which, in normal circumstances, would have been quite inconceivable. Speaker 0: The bribe worked. Italy joined the Allies and declared war on the Central Powers in August 1915. But Britain's strategy to undermine the enemy via the Ottoman Empire also required subversion. By using domestic opposition to weaken, maybe even destroy it, Britain exploited a new movement sweeping through the empire. Nationalism. Speaker 1: Nationalism in the sense of believing that there are peoples with a clear cultural identity and that these people should live independent. That idea spread to the Middle East as to other parts of the world in the latter part of 19th century. So you had the beginnings in the Ottoman Empire of a Turkish nationalism. Speaker 0: This came to a head when the young Turks power in a coup in 1908 and started to impose their language and culture on the Arabs of the empire. But this only reawakened an interest amongst Arabs in their own heritage. A 1000 years before, Arabs had brought the technology and literature of the east to the west. And their religion, Islam, had encompassed much of Asia, North Africa and Southwestern Europe. The idea of recovering that historic grandeur had remained in the consciousness of Arab intellectuals. By the start of the First World War, the antagonism between Arab and Turk had increased. Speaker 1: The very fact that the Turks were saying we want to have a unified empire meant the Arabs said, wait a minute. We're not part of this. So all of this Literary and nationalistic revival then took a much more political form, and therefore, you got the emergence of Arab nationalism. Speaker 2: They had arrived at the conclusion that remaining in the Ottoman Empire was becoming hopeless, this, that they couldn't actually share power with the Turks, and they began thinking of having their own Speaker 0: By the summer of 1915, British intelligence confirmed that the Arab nationalist movement was the breakthrough the government was looking for. Britain and her French ally Dispatched officers to sound out Arab leaders. Speaker 2: Both the French and the British started, You could say seducing various local Arab leaders that if you side with us, we'll give you your independence, so why don't you leave the Ottomans? And various people were tempted as a result. If they they thought they could actually gain independence, why not Side with the Europeans against the Ottomans. Speaker 0: The idea was to tempt the Arabs into a revolt against their Ottoman overlords And create a diversion which would tie down the central powers in the Middle East. Ironically, the impetus for such a diversion had come not From London but from the Arab world. In the Hejaz in Western Arabia, sheriff Hussein, its ruler, was set on extending his political and geographical domain. He believed he might be able to do it with the help of the British. In turn, the British were impressed by Sharif Hussein's family credentials as custodians of the holy places of Islam. Speaker 1: They call themselves Hashemites. They call the family Hashemites because that's the family or the tribe of the prophet Muhammad. They were the Bani Hashim, the sons of Hashim. So he was Sharif Hussein was the leader of the Hashemites. He was the person responsible for Mecca and Medina. And although he worked with the Ottomans before the First World War, once the First World War happened, he saw this was his chance. Speaker 0: A chance too for the British who saw support sheriff Hussein as a way to threaten the sultan's hold on the caliphate, the political leadership of the Islamic world. Speaker 2: The British, because they were Fighting the Ottomans, and the Ottomans were claiming to be the real representatives of Islam. They wanted a counterforce, And the counterforce was represented by Sharif Hussein being a descendant of the prophet. But Sharif Hussein was speaking of liberating Arab lands, Building a new national state. He wanted to be king of the Arabs, not simply of Arabians. Speaker 0: In July 1915, Sharif Hussein smuggled a message to the British high commissioner in Cairo, sir Henry McMahon, Offering to raise a substantial Arab force against the Ottomans in return for British support for Arab independence. In the ensuing secret correspondence between the 2 men, Sharif Hussein was given to understand that he could expect British Support in achieving some of his ambitions in the event of an Ottoman defeat. His letter of October 26, 1915 Outline the main points of the arrangement. Speaker 6: The actual document itself is absolutely Riven with ambiguity. There's no doubt about that. The question is whether Hussein recognizes that. My sense of Saying is that he does recognize it. In other words, there is no wool being poured over his eyes because he's perfectly aware that if he's going to create A modern Arab empire, he's going to need some logistical economic Development and that can only come from the outside world. Speaker 0: Taking Britain's assurances of support at face value, Hussein, together with his sons Faisal and Abdullah, Amassed a sizable force. The new army was commanded by the young and charismatic Faisal, who had captured should the imagination of the Arab masses in the quest for Arab independence. Yet even as Hussein and Fizal mobilized their troops, the British were preparing to sell them short. Back in London in the spring of 1916, Britain was negotiating with France about the future shape of the Middle East. Behind closed doors, sir Mark Sykes of the British Foreign Office had been meeting his French opposite number, Francois Georges Picot. Britain knew it was vital to offer the French a stake in the spoils of the Ottoman Empire should they win the war. Speaker 7: There was an awareness on the British side that they had made such huge sacrifices that one couldn't just ignore, the French ambitions, and the French were determined to have their historical peace of the Levant. Speaker 0: Pouring over a map of the Levant, Sykes and Pico personally drew in the areas they wished to see under their control. Their secret deal amounted to the virtual carve up of the Middle East. In area A for the French and area B for the British, the imperialists intended to exercise power indirectly. They would appoint advisers and take charge of the finances in their respective spheres of influence. Then there was the area colored blue which was to be directly controlled by France. This included what was then known as Greater Syria where the French traditionally had commercial and religious interests. As for the area colored pink known as Iraq With its strategic ports, railways and oil, this was to be under British rule. The area, colored yellow, represented Palestine and was envisaged as an international zone except for Haifa. Speaker 2: What the British wanted was the oil of Iraq, and they concentrated on getting Iraq and getting away from Iraq to the Mediterranean in order to transport this oil. So they got Haifa on the Palestinian coast, and they got most of Iraq. Speaker 7: The Sykes PICA agreement was a pretty shameful document, and I wouldn't attempt to Defended, but it was drawn up by people who were sort of operating under the old, kind of balance of power considerations in an imperial, frame of mind. Speaker 0: Unaware of these Secret dealings behind their backs. Hussein and Faisal proclaimed independence. And in June 1916, attacked the Turkish Troops. The Arab revolt against the Ottomans had begun. The Turkish garrison at Mecca was soon overrun, and the Seaport at Jidda seized. By 1917, Hussein and Faisal's forces had pushed North and engaged the Ottoman Turks along the Hejaz Railway. The British saw the Arab Revolt as part of its strategy for creating a military diversion against the central powers. In a pincer movement, Britain had launched a campaign from the southwest to ensure control of the Suez Canal and the Levant. And from the southeast, it was fighting to secure the oil wells of Iraq. All this to attack the Central Powers at their weakest point, The Ottoman Empire. Speaker 2: The Arabs hitched their fortunes to the British. They considered themselves to be fighting with the allies. But at the same time, they were not merged into the British Army, That they continue to act as an independent army called the Northern Army. Speaker 0: While the Arab army advanced northwards, Britain's general Allenby had crossed the Suez Canal. And by the spring of 1917, his forces had reached the frontier of Palestine. The war in Europe, however, was still not going well for Britain. The attempted push through the German lines of the Somme had produced little territorial gain. And the cost in lives was colossal. In London, there had been a change of leadership. The new prime minister, Lloyd George, felt that the Allied war effort needed a fresh impetus. Although America had so far been neutral in the war, Lloyd George was convinced that could be changed. He believed there was 1 powerful group which might influence the American government. Speaker 3: Lloyd George thought that The American decision, whether to join or not would depend critically on public opinion, And the Jewish support could tilt the scales in one direction or or the other. Speaker 5: You've got to remember that the British foreign office Greatly overestimate the political power of international Jewry, particularly the wealthy, financial, and commercial, Jewish elites. Speaker 6: What is extraordinary about this situation is that here you have, particularly the British, Seeing the Jewish world as one collective monolithic entity. And in that sense, They start looking at the role of the Jews in the war as being something which might be important. And from the point of view of the Allies, something else quite remarkable, this monolithic collective entity is pro German. Speaker 0: Many Jews in the upper echelons of German society did indeed have close connections to the Kaiser's foreign office. A new Jewish nationalist movement, Zionism, had also been able to establish its headquarters in Berlin. Zionism had originated in the 18 eighties after Theodore Herzl published a book espousing the virtues of a Jewish state. This caused a sensation amongst Jewish intellectuals in Germany, Austria, and Russia who shared Herzl's outrage at the escalation of anti Jewish Speaker 3: The end of 19th century saw the rise of anti Semitism all over Europe, in Austria, In Germany, in France, but particularly in Eastern Europe, in Poland, and in Russia. And the pogrom against the Jews in Russia gave rise to the establishment of The lovers of Zion societies in a number of Russian cities who started to promote and to finance and to sponsor colonization, immigration to Palestine. Herzl came to the conclusion that the Jews were not safe anywhere in Europe, And the only solution was for the Jews to have a state of their own over which they could exercise sovereignty and where they would not be A minority. Speaker 0: What had also given Zionism its appeal was the way in which it fitted in to historic Jewish aspirations. Scattered throughout the world since the destruction of the Jerusalem temple in the 1st century AD, many Jews had cherished the idea of returning one day to what their scriptures had told them was the promised land. In fact, there had already been a small community of indigenous Jews in Palestine. But even when some European Jews established settlements throughout the late 19th century, the whole Jewish community, by 1914, Constituted barely 8% of the population. The Zionist leader in Britain, Chaim Weizmann, had been lobbying the government for a guarantee that in the event of an Ottoman defeat, it would support Jewish emigration to Palestine. By early 1917, Lloyd George's view of Jews as globally influential convinced him that Zionism was another nationalist movement which should be co opted to the Allied cause. In March, Mark Sykes began negotiations with Weizmann. Speaker 6: There is a a bee in the bonnet of people like Mark Sykes, But actually, the Jews do ultimately look to each other and look to their own interest. And if that interest As they are being told by Weitzman is, what we really want is Palestine. They're prepared to believe it. They're prepared to go along with it. Speaker 0: As negotiations with Weizmann continued over the following months, The war deteriorated rapidly for the Allies. The German submarine campaign was seriously weakening Britain's merchant fleet. And although America had entered the war on the Allied side, President Woodrow Wilson was not yet willing to supply a significant number of troops. Britain's latest attempt to keep up the pressure on the Western Front soon became came bogged down in the muddy trenches of Passchendaele. As thousands of young men's lives were wasted in another fruitless campaign, morale amongst the soldiers plummeted. Amongst the soldiers plummeted. But the most serious threat to the Allied war machine came from the east. Russia was on the verge of collapse. After massive defeats at the hands of the Germans, the war weary country was disintegrating with food shortages, strikes, and demonstrations. When the czar was deposed in a revolution, Britain and France again greatly alarmed. Speaker 5: The point is that once Russia and its war effort begins to collapse, Essentially, the Germans have won the First World War unless they bring the Americans in. There's no way that the British and the French, on their own, I'll ever get to defeat Germany. Speaker 0: In October, the British government received an intelligence report suggesting that Jews were a significant influence in the leadership of the Bolshevik Party, the New revolutionary movement emerging as the dominant force in Russia. Lloyd George feared that these communists would take Russia out of the war. With the Americans still refusing to commit sufficient forces, he knew it It was time to act. He instructed his foreign secretary, Arthur Balfour, to issue a pledge to capture the hearts and minds of the Jewish People. Speaker 8: His Majesty's government view with favor the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people and will use their best endeavors to facilitate the achievements of this object. Speaker 0: The Balfour Declaration was issued on November 2, 1917, just as British forces were occupying Palestine. Speaker 3: I would say that the Balfour Declaration has to be understood not as an idealistic gesture, but It has to be understood within the framework of British imperial policy, and Lloyd George Was the main instigator of that, declaration because he believed that it would serve Britain's interests. Speaker 0: But this was also the first time that any major European power had given official backing for the Zionist goal of making Palestine into a Jewish homeland. Yet sheriff Hussein had understood that Palestine had been promised as part of his deal Arab independence. Anticipating Arab outrage at the prospect of a Jewish homeland in a largely Arab province, The Balfour Declaration had also stated that Speaker 8: Nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non Jewish communities in Palestine. Speaker 0: The declaration, nonetheless, appeared to indicate British support for Jewish immigration. Speaker 2: There were only a mere 80,000 out of Some like 700,000 people in Palestine who were Jews. The Indigenous inhabitants of Palestine were referred to as non Jewish inhabitants, and that that Palestine was being identified Even at that stage, as a Jewish land, and all the others had no defined identity. They were simply non Jewish. Speaker 3: The Balfour Declaration was what it says, A declaration. It wasn't a treaty. It wasn't a signed agreement. It was A declaration in support of the establishment of a national home for the Jewish people in Palestine. Speaker 0: In fact, the only treaty Britain had signed in regard to Palestine was with the French, The secret Sykes Picot Agreement. On November 7th, within a few days of the Balfour Declaration, the Bolsheviks took power in Russia. Lord George hoped that it would have the desired effect of appeasing the Jews in communist leadership. Speaker 6: What is it that they supposedly so want as Jews? Palestine. Now the whole argument is is totally logical. It's a nonsense argument because these particular people, if one were to think of people like Trotsky or Zinoviev or Yaffe, Some of the key Jewish leaders in the Russian Revolution, the the November Revolution, these these people, of course, are internationalists. Speaker 3: There were 15 to 20 Jews in the higher echelons of the Bolshevik party. Most of them were anti Zionist. And after they came to power, they, soon after they came to power, they issued a declaration to say that Zionism is a capitalist ploy, a capitalist idea. Speaker 0: The wildly inaccurate intelligence report on which Lloyd George based his strategy was to have major implications for Britain. Within weeks, Russia's new leaders did exactly the opposite of what he had expected. Not only did they pull out of the war, They opened up the archives of the czar's foreign office and published the secret treaties. The very treaties Britain had engineered with her allies to carve up the Ottoman Empire, and to which Russia had been privy. Speaker 5: That, of course, is a very great embarrassment to the Western Allies because the Allies have been doing all sorts of deals behind the scenes in which they have handed out to each other large sections of the world, meanwhile, Openly preaching that they are fighting the war in defense of democracy and, of course, also Telling among others, the Arabs, that they are supporters of self determination for the peoples of the Ottoman Empire. Speaker 1: Publication of secret treaties by the Bolsheviks certainly create an enormous suspicion in the Arab world, and this meant that the Sharif Hussein and the other Wait a minute. What's going on? What a, why are you not giving us independence? And secondly, why are you dividing us up into zone a and zone b? And at that point, of course, the Arabs realized that not only with the had the British got their own particular interests, for example, in the ports of Palestine or in Iraq, but that they had promised other things to the French. Speaker 0: Amid Arab confusion and suspicion, general Allenby entered Jerusalem on foot together with Sykes, Pico, and a number of other allied notables. His British led forces had captured the holy city in December 1917. The leaders of the Arab Revolt, however, were nowhere to be seen. Fearing that Hussein and Faisal might lose heart, the British government forwarded a message to them reiterating British commitment to Arab independence. Speaker 8: The Arab race will be given full opportunity of once again forming a nation in the world. This can only be achieved by the Adams themselves uniting, and Great Britain and her allies will pursue a policy with this ultimate unity in you. Speaker 0: Hussein stayed loyal to the Allied cause, still prepared to accept Britain's word on Arab independence, Although he spoke of settling accounts after the war. From Alain Bay's point of view, He continued to rely on Arab support in the war against the Ottomans. But now that Jerusalem had been occupied by the British, 1 party seized the initiative. In April 1918, I'm Weizmann and the International Zionist Commission traveled to Palestine to lay the foundation for a Hebrew university. Their hope was that it would become the intellectual hub of Zionism. Weitzman's visit, however, caused widespread alarm and indignation among the Arab population. And when he and the chief rabbi of Jerusalem met general Allenby, It looked as if Britain was preparing to honor the Balfour Declaration. 6 months later, Allenby's forces entered Damascus With their ally, Faisal's northern army, they had pushed the Ottoman troops north through Palestine into Syria. Speaker 2: The Arab revolt did contribute To the victory of the allies, first of all, it protected British flank in Palestine. Second, it kept a number of Turkish and German troops preoccupied. And third, the the British could I have never legitimized what they were doing unless they had the blessing of a particular Arab force. Speaker 0: On the 3rd October, the people of Damascus Flocked to Faisal's victory parade. If he was to seize power, he knew it was of great importance to make his presence felt And to be seen by the Arab people as their liberator. Later the same day, however, Faisal met with General Allenby At the Victoria Hotel in Damascus, Allenby warned him that his rule in Syria would be limited. Speaker 2: The British, by that time, knew that they were going to hand over Syria to the French. So they couldn't actually accept Faisal as a legitimate ruler. All they could do is to pay him, his salary and the expenses of his army and his administration. Speaker 0: Undaunted by Allenby's his warnings, Faisal assumed the title of governor of Damascus. With the support of his father, Sheriff Hussein, He set about creating a power base for their goal of an independent Arab state. On the 31st October, the Ottomans were finally defeated. And at 11 o'clock on the 11th November 1918, the guns fell silent in Europe as the war with the Central Powers came to an end. The peace conference at Versailles began in January 1919. Representatives of the victorious allies, such as the French prime minister, Thomasin, and the American president, Woodrow Wilson, gathered to sort out what was to be done with the Former territories of the defeated empires. Now the liberal use of promises by the British government had to be prioritized. Speaker 4: They did indeed make pledges to the Arabs, but they also made pledges to the Jews. And they also made pledges to the French and the Russians and everybody else. And these people saw the world as an imperial world. Not only did they want to carve up the Middle East, they wanted to carve up Russia. They thought this was the last great moment in which the imperial powers would be able to sit down and grab what was going, particularly since there was no one to stop them. Speaker 0: But Britain and her old ally, France, were up against the American president Woodrow Wilson's vision of a new world order, which promoted national self determination. Speaker 2: Once independence had seemed to be a possibility That this principle of self determination, supported by the Americans, was going to be offered to All those who were to be liberated from former empires like the Habsburgs and the Ottomans. What the Palestinians wanted was an independent state. Speaker 0: In fact, Faisal had come from Damascus to plead the Arab cause. But the future of Palestine and the Middle East formed part of Britain's pledge to France in the Sykes Picoca Carver. In the event, Woodrow Wilson's principles about self determination were forgotten when it came to the people of the Middle East. Britain and France were free to go ahead with their agreement. But what of the promises Britain had made to the Jews regarding Palestine? Foreign secretary Arthur Balfour, in a confidential memo during the Versailles peace talks with America, France, and Italy, wrote. Speaker 8: The 4 great powers are committed to Zionism. And Zionism be it right or wrong, good or bad is rooted in age long traditions. In present needs in future hopes, a far profounder import than the desires and prejudices of the 700,000 Arabs who now inhabit that ancient land. Speaker 0: That might sound like a warm endorsement of Zionism. Yet further in the postwar memorandum, Balfour hints at a much more cynical agenda. Speaker 8: So far as Palestine is concerned, The powers have made no declaration of policy, which at least in letter, they have not always intended to violate. Speaker 0: The Versailles peace conference was concluded on June 28, 1919, with the creation of the League of Nations. The 1st global institution for peace and security. Its covenant provided that the Arab and other territories ceded by the defeated Ottoman Empire should be administered by mandates which meant in effect that Britain and France were given the authority to impose their rule over the Arab territories. On November 21, 1919, Francois Georges Picot, the co architect of the Sykes Picot agreement, and the French general, Guro, arrived in Beirut. And so began the imposition of the French mandate for Syria and Lebanon. The British Forces who had occupied the region since ousting the Ottoman Turks during the last months of the war were handing over power to the French, thus fulfilling their wartime pledge. Faisal, who had been the governor of Damascus now for 16 months, had been consolidating his position. When he was proclaimed king by the Syrian National Congress, the French were incensed and general Guro sent in his troops. By August 7, 1920, Faisel had been deposed and had to Faisal of a single independent state were now a distant memory for the Europeans. Speaker 1: The whole issue of spheres of influence meant that What appeared what was at first appeared to be a willingness to accept a single Arab state was in fact seriously diluted. And then on top of that, of course, the very fact of there being at French area and a British area meant that in effect, this was the seed of partition. So you had both Independence was denied, but also the unity of this area was denied. Speaker 0: The boundaries and governments of the Middle Eastern states that emerged bore the unmistakable the French half of the previously Ottoman province of Greater Syria became the mandate for Lebanon and Syria. The other half became the British mandate for Transjordan and Palestine. In the east, the Ottoman area of Mesopotamia, which included the oil fields of Mersour, was given to Britain as the mandate for Iraq. Speaker 2: So this was basically The importance of the Sykes Picot agreement, to divide what is called the fertile crescent between Iraq and Syria and let Britain get access to the oil of the area and be able to exploit it in the future. Speaker 0: But British rule was initially rejected by the Iraqi people until Faisal was installed as king in July 1921. Britain hoped the limited power it devolved to him would serve to placate the frustrated demands for Arab independence. But sheriff Hussein expected more from the British. More from the British. Speaker 2: He never gave up the idea that the British had promised him independence, not only in Arabia, but in Syria and Iraq as well. And he wanted the British to fulfill their Speaker 0: Sheriff Hussein's dream of an Arab kingdom ruled by the Hashemites was only partially fulfilled. For although his other son, Abdullah, became King of Transjordan, their old rival, Ibn Saud, swept the Hashemites out of Hejaz when he conquered the Shemites out of Hejaz when he conquered the whole of the Arabian Peninsula. In Jerusalem, An administration was established by the British in the spring of 1920. There were no plans for devolving power in Palestine. Palestine was a land sacred to 3 religions. Jews were a small minority who had lived harmoniously with Christians and the much larger community of Muslims for 100 of years. But the Balfour declaration, promising Jews a homeland in had been incorporated into the British mandate at Versailles. Palestine was thus to be opened for new European Jewish immigration. With celebrations and parades in support of Zionist activities. It seemed as if the British were going to honor their pledges to the Jews and ignore Palestinian hopes of independence. Speaker 3: The Arabs Had a strong case, but very poor advocates. The Zionists had a case. It wasn't as strong as that of the local Arabs, but they had brilliant advocates. Zionism is one of the greatest public relations success stories of the 20th century, and Chaim Weizmann Exemplified these traditional Jewish skills of advocacy and, persuasion. Speaker 0: Some of these skills were clearly in evidence when Weizmann and various Zionist groups helped finance land purchases and the building of settlements for immigrant Jews. At the same time, Political and security organizations were created to support the emerging Jewish homeland. The Arab community in Palestine was incensed. Speaker 2: The Palestinians couldn't conceive their country being divided or given away to Another community, which had nothing to do with the Middle East in the 1st place and was almost wholly European at the time. So to them, it seemed absurd that 600 to 700,000 should give up their land, their homes, their villages, their towns, and hand them over to a minority, which was dispersed, throughout Palestine. And Palestine, after all, is named after its people, who are the Palestinians. Speaker 0: In 1925, Arthur Balfour toured the new Jewish settlements in Palestine. Although he was fated as a hero of the Zionist cause, the immigration of European Jews was to have unforeseen consequences for British rule in Palestine. Speaker 3: I believe that the Balfour Declaration was one of the most serious mistakes in British imperial history. It, committed Britain to, support of Jewish nationalism in Palestine after the war, and, it did not, produced any immediate benefits for Britain. Speaker 6: Without the Balfour Declaration, There could have been no genuine development of a Jewish national home, and the follow through In 1948, where you get the creation of a state of Israel, simply would not have happened. It it requires the umbrella of the British to be there, in effect, to support the emerging Jewish national home militarily at the bottom line. The very fact There are British troops, British policemen there to protect the Jewish communities is ultimately central to the situation. It could not have been done in any other way. Speaker 0: Throughout the 1930s and forties, the years of Nazi persecution in the Holocaust. Jewish immigration to Palestine increased rapidly. But what was seen by the Arabs As an alien incursion and the Jews as a fulfillment of historic rights led to polarization and violence. In response to terrorist acts by Arabs, Britain restricted the immigration. But the policy only stimulated Jewish terrorism. Against this background, Britain relinquished its mandate. And the state of Israel was born in 1948. When the first of several wars between the new state and its Arab neighbors began, thousands of Palestinian Arabs fled their homeland. Thus, the strategies employed by Britain to win the First World War Inadversely left a deep divide between Arab and Jew. Speaker 3: The most serious Consequences of British policy during the war was the encouragement of Arab nationalism and Jewish nationalism. And in the aftermath of the First World War, Britain was left With this legacy of double dealing and of betrayal, which was to haunt her for a long, long time. Speaker 1: Clearly, it played a role in dividing the Arab world into different states, in allowing the establishment of the state of Israel and in frustrating Arab desires. But if what happened in in Sykes Picot and everything else when the First World War is used as an excuse for the problems of the Middle East now, I think that would be a mistake. But, yes, the roots of what we see today Certainly arose from the double dealing of the 1st World War and from the frustrated expectations of that time.

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

The Cabal — Royals still rule us… 👇🏼

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

The Cabal - Royals still rule us... >The Bloodline< House Wettin, aka House Coburg and Saxe Gotha is a supremely powerful Germanic medieval bloodline dating back to 900AD. All the monarchs of Europe are either directly descended or directly related to this bloodline. This powerful cabal of royals has (throughout history) ruled the thrones of many European countries, including Portugal, Bulgaria, Poland, Germany, Russia, Liechtenstein. And they still rule the thrones of key European countries such as the United Kingdom, Belgium (HQ of EU) and the Netherlands to this day. They (via their intelligence agencies) secretly control everything in the western world. Many people view elite European and American oligarchs as the "cabal," but the truth is that Royals are the top of the food chain - legally more powerful than all oligarchs, politicians, and generals combined. They even control the United States via their corrupt deal with the CIA and FBI - blackmailing, bribing, or assassinating anyone who dares to get in their way (including Presidents).

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

Black Ops 101 — ☀️ The Dark Truth About the CIA/MI6+++ 👇🏼

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

< Black Ops 101 > The Dark Truth About the CIA ☠️ FULL THREAD 🧵 Many people think that the CIA is a patriotic organization that protects Americans from danger, and informs the President about what's happening in the world so he can make good decisions. But that couldn't be further from the truth. The truth is that the CIA is a vicious paramilitary mafia, that rigs elections, overthrows governments, kills people, and manipulates our presidents into doing their bidding. They are the world's foremost experts in lying, cheating, and stealing from other countries. They sow chaos, degeneracy, corruption, and violence everywhere they go. 🥷🏽Uses Terrorists & Criminals as Assassins 💰Blackmails & Bribes Politicians Worldwide 💵Funded By Slavery & Drug-Dealing 👑Uses Authority of the British Crown How It Started 🔥 The CIA was created by British Intelligence during WW2, when MI6 came over and taught Americans the ruthless tactics they had been developing for centuries.

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

Global Banking Cartel — FED Timeline 👇🏼

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

Royal Elites / Rothschild Formula > Global Banking Cartel 1913 Federal Reserve Act Federal Reserve Inc. A Private Company? Shareholders = ? IS THIS Constitutional? IS THIS LEGAL Are You A DEBT SLAVE? What is your recourse? What is a Federal Reserve Note? Define NOTE COLORABLE MONEY > COLORABLE COURTS 1933 United States Declares BANKRUPTCY United States Inc. A Private Company? Shareholders =? CREDITORS=? US BANKRUPTCY Still In Receivership? Emergency Banking Act March 9 1933 House Joint Resolution 192 73rd Congress June 5 1933 1938 Supreme Court - Erie Railroad v Tompkins Why is this relevant? Constitution Common Law Equity Law Admiralty Law AND / OR Statutory Jurisdiction? Statutory Jurisdiction Definition in Blacks Law Dictionary? Why Not? YOUR NAME Birth Certificate = ALL CAPs Social Security Card = ALL CAPs Drivers License = ALL CAPs Are YOU a Living Soul or a Person>CORPORATION? Blacks Law Dictionary 6th edition Birth Certificate Applications Started WHEN? Social Security Registration Started WHEN? Birth Certificate # = CUSIP SS# = CUSIP Cestui Que Vie Trust Cannon Law Blacks Law Dictionary 6th Edition Are YOU the Trustee or the Beneficiary? Who Created The Debt? The Bond? The CREDITORS? Uniform Commercial Code UCC = Private International Law? If UCC Private WHO OWNS? 1938 Supreme Court - Erie Railroad v Tompkins Common Law > No Compelled Performance Equity Law > Compels Performance Admiralty > Compelled Performance > AND Criminal Penalties > AND Requires International Contract? Statutory Jurisdiction = ? Are You A United States Citizen? Federal United States? OR Continental United States? United States = Federal CORPORATION Congressional Act 1871 28 USC 3002 - Part VI - Chapter 176 -Sub-Chapter 176 - Subsection A, (15) Did 14th Amendment Create A Lower Class of CITIZEN? 15 U.S. Statute At Large July 27 1868 "Expatriation Clause" WHY Is This Relevant? 14th passed when? What Is The District Of Columbia? Why Is This Relevant? Your Name as Signature ''Without Prejudice'' UCC 1-308 What is a ''compelled benefit''? ''Argument and Recourse'' UCC 1-103 COLORABLE MONEY > COLORABLE COURTS Are YOU a TAX / FEE / FINE SLAVE? What is YOUR recourse? UCC 1 - ''Secured Party Creditor"? YOU have more than you know THIS is what TERRIFIES the Cabal SHEEP NO MORE... 🦁🇺🇸🎻

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

Curious why Hillary’s Email Server and Podesta’s email hashes are all tied back to “COMPANIES HOUSE” Crown corporations… Important Timeline…👇🏼

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

Interesting Dates! 🪄 NOVEMBER 2nd, 2020 (1 day before The US Presidential Election) - Neustar Inc., Announces Acquisition of Verisign’s Public DNS Service NOVEMBER 2nd, 2020 (1 day before The US Presidential Election) - Ericsson completes acquisition of Cradlepoint Nov 3rd, 2020 🪃

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

Follow the Money, Corporate Acquisitions and Kiddy Domains… 👀☀️⚖️👇🏼

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

What if I told you there's a LITERAL Shadow War going on in CYBERSPACE - RIGHT NOW - between several Former and current Presidents++ working against the best interest of We The People and that there's data, contracts and CONCRETE EVIDENCE to prove it all? 🚨 Twitter Files 2.0 🚨

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

How many coincidences before it’s mathematically impossible? 👇🏼👀⚔️⚖️⛈️

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

How you tie John Podesta and Hillary's emails to the Ukraine through @Google's & @gmail to Ukraine dating to 2011... 💯 From the IP to Crimes and Charges already charged by the DOJ (Ericsson and Telia AB). Game Over. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Fr66YXdaYAIemeL?format=jpg&name=4096x4096

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

Google’s Jared Cohen and Eric Schmidt — War Crimes, the Arab Spring — Human Defection Tracking 👀⚖️☀️👇🏼

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

Jared Cohen and Google's Eric Schmidt's documented proof of using their Technology to tack and monitor the overthrow of Gaddafi and other Arab Spring leaders... They also wrote and spoke about this in their Private emails published by WikiLeaks and in books they (Cohen and Schmidt) published together. https://archive.ph/R13l2 Sources: https://www.wired.com/story/what-is-dns-hijacking/ Breakdown of the War in Syria: https://qintel.pro/syria/ Breakdown of the War in Libya: https://qintel.pro/libya/ Google is not what it seems: https://web.archive.org/web/20230918192418/https://wikileaks.org/google-is-not-what-it-seems/#ftn5

What Is DNS Hijacking? A recent attack on WikiLeaks illustrates a vulnerability deep in the routing system of the internet itself. wired.com

Syria | QINTELPRO qintel.pro

Libya | QINTELPRO qintel.pro

Julian Assange - Google Is Not What It Seems web.archive.org

@Vltra_MK — Michael Rae Khoury

Posted - December 13, 2023 at 9:26 PM

Saved - December 14, 2023 at 8:09 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

The posts discuss various conspiracy theories involving religious fronts, the Cabal, the CIA, the Bank of England, and the Rothschild family. They claim that these entities control world events, manipulate governments, fund terrorism, and have ties to the British Crown. The posts also mention the involvement of American corporations, Zionism, and the funding of Nazis. The author encourages further discussion on the topic.

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

Who’s ready for some REALLY DIFFICULT TRUTHS? https://t.co/WnltGsGtDU

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

I’m more of a Rip the bandaid off kinda guy… 🤷🏽‍♂️ The next few reports will be 🔥 https://t.co/afE3qdpceS

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

All “Religious fronts” are involved… The Death Cult hijacked everyone & everything — using tropes to cause us to fight one another (by design) — then use the “one world government” trope so we lose our ability to come together. They’re sick & stupid… God & Real History Win

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

It’s time to FINALLY TELL the Whole Truth about Las Vegas, 9/11 and 9-1-1 from the 1st-hand perspective of the affected & [the Observer]. 🔱 The Game Is Over. 🕋🕌🕍⛪️ Check Mate. ♟️ Biblical. ☦️ https://t.co/9wqcYSGwt6

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

Who really runs the world throughout History?

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

"How Britain Started the Arab-Israeli Conflict" 👀 This is a must-watch with all that's happening... 💯 (suggested at 1.5x speed)

Video Transcript AI Summary

The video discusses the origins of the Arab-Israeli conflict, tracing it back to British double dealing during World War I. The British made conflicting promises to both the Arabs and the Jews, leading to a legacy of bloodshed in the Middle East. The Sykes-Picot Agreement divided the region into French and British spheres of influence, while the Balfour Declaration supported the establishment of a Jewish homeland in Palestine. These actions created tensions between the Arab and Jewish communities, ultimately leading to the establishment of the state of Israel and the displacement of Palestinian Arabs. The consequences of British policies during the war continue to impact the region today.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: The bitter struggle between Arab and Jew for control of the Holy Land has caused untold suffering in the Middle East for generations. It is often claimed that the crisis originated with Jewish immigration to Palestine and the foundation of the state Yet the roots of the conflict are to be found much earlier, In British double dealing during the First World War. This is a story of intrigue among rival empires, of misguided strategies and of how conflicting promises to Arab and Jew created a legacy of bloodshed which has determined the fate of the Middle East. Speaker 1: During the First World War, the British, the French, and the Russians had these secret plans to carve up the Ottoman Empire, because they believed that would balance out their imperial ambitions, but tough luck for the Turks, the Arabs, and anyone else who got in the way. Speaker 2: Certainly, all the seeds were planted then in the sense that it was the British who promised the Arabs independence on the one hand And, a Jewish homeland on the other, and you could not simply reconcile one With the other, Speaker 3: the British scattered promises to anyone who might be of some use To them without thinking about the consequences. So British duplicity, British double dealing went a long way to perpetuate the conflict in Palestine. Speaker 4: At the end of the day, when you're fighting a war, you are very liberal in what you're offering in terms of a post war settlement. When you get down to the conference table when the war has ended and you have to start honoring your agreements, you then have to decide what's in your interest or not, and it puts all the Middle East as a western flag for their power in India and their power in Asia in general. Speaker 0: The story of Britain's involvement in the Middle East and the ensuing struggle between Arab and Jew begins with her colonial past. At the beginning of 20th century, King Edward the 7th ruled over a vast empire with interests in every part Speaker 4: of the world. India became increasingly important because it was the 2nd pillar of British power in the world. Moving the Indian Army about was extremely important in extending British interests and British influence across the globe. And the Suez Canal was, of course, the quick way To do that, it's very important for the British shared geopolitical position to ensure the Suez Canal remains safe and secure. Speaker 0: With this aim in mind, Britain had become the only European power to establish a major foothold in the Middle East, in the principalities around the Persian Gulf, in Aden, and in Egypt. Britain had annexed Egypt from Turkey's Ottoman Empire in 18 82. And by the time it was made a protectorate in 1914, Cairo had become the center of British power in the Middle East. The presence of imperial troops in the region was of vital strategic importance. For the Ottoman Empire under Sultan Mohammed But the 5th was an alliance with Britain's much feared rival, Germany. Together with the Austro Hungarian Empire, these countries made up the Central Powers and pitted against them were the 3 allies, Britain, France and Russia. From the Ottoman capital, Constantinople in Turkey. The sultan ruled over the last of the great Islamic empires. It had been an almost terminal decline for decades. Yet the fate of the Ottoman Empire was to be sealed by the outbreak of the First World War in August 1914. In Europe, Germany's rapid advance was halted by Britain and France along the Austro front. In the east, Russia's war against Germany and Austria Hungary also reached deadlock. The powerful weapons of the industrial age were killing thousands of men in the trenches of every army. Speaker 5: All of the leading powers expected the war to be over within a matter of months. So in that sense, all of them are surprised at the end of 14, when not merely is the war going on, but it shows every sign of being likely to go on for a very long time. At that point, They began to think about new ways of winning the war. Speaker 0: Britain's prime minister, Asquith, felt that with the stalemate in Europe, it was essential to widen the conflict. Together with Foreign secretary, Lord Grey, minister for war, Lord Kitchener, and the first lord of the admiralty, Winston Churchill, they masterminded a complex strategy to undermine the Mine the central powers. Speaker 4: This was a global war, and the British saw the Middle East very much in a global context. The traditional British preference for sideshows, as people, unfavorably call it, the indirect strategy, The way of, attacking the soft underbelly, as Churchill called it, of the enemy. Speaker 0: And the soft underbelly was seen to be Turkey. Britain's secret plan involved, on the one hand, a military diversion, and on the other, a devious use of diplomacy through bribery, Subversion and double dealing, all these devices focused on the enemy's weakest link, Turkey's Ottoman Empire. Speaker 1: Diplomacy in general has always had a secret dimension to it. Whether where but where discretion ends and conspiracy begins is an open question. But during the period up to and during the First World War, there was a particularly intense set of negotiations and discussions between the major imperial powers, between the French, the Russians, and the British, in particular, cutting in the Italians as well about what would they do When the war was over and when the Ottoman Empire broke up. Speaker 0: The British government hoped that by striking a deal over the spoils of war, It would strengthen the alliance against the Central Powers. Amongst the allies, Russia had long sought access to the Mediterranean. In a secret treaty of March 1915, Britain and France offered What was to the czar a prize of vital geopolitical importance, Constantinople. Speaker 6: It is that key outlet into the wider world and into the Mediterranean. And it is the one thing, of course, the British and the French have been Attempting to prevent the Russians from achieving. So this is a complete This is this is the British, the French, and the Russians Coming to an agreement over something which was, up to this point, almost inconceivable. Speaker 0: Italy's King Vittoria Emmanuel is another target for bribery. Britain, France, and Russia tried to tempt Italy, a pro German state, to join the Allies. In April 1915, a secret treaty offered Italy a substantial bit of Ottoman real estate in Anatolia. Speaker 6: Again, it's another power coming into the equation and being offered territorial advancement which, in normal circumstances, would have been quite inconceivable. Speaker 0: The bribe worked. Italy joined the Allies and declared war on the Central Powers in August 1915. But Britain's strategy to undermine the enemy via the Ottoman Empire also required subversion. By using domestic opposition to weaken, maybe even destroy it, Britain exploited a new movement sweeping through the empire. Nationalism. Speaker 1: Nationalism in the sense of believing that there are peoples with a clear cultural identity and that these people should live independent. That idea spread to the Middle East as to other parts of the world in the latter part of 19th century. So you had the beginnings in the Ottoman Empire of a Turkish nationalism. Speaker 0: This came to a head when the young Turks power in a coup in 1908 and started to impose their language and culture on the Arabs of the empire. But this only reawakened an interest amongst Arabs in their own heritage. A 1000 years before, Arabs had brought the technology and literature of the east to the west. And their religion, Islam, had encompassed much of Asia, North Africa and Southwestern Europe. The idea of recovering that historic grandeur had remained in the consciousness of Arab intellectuals. By the start of the First World War, the antagonism between Arab and Turk had increased. Speaker 1: The very fact that the Turks were saying we want to have a unified empire meant the Arabs said, wait a minute. We're not part of this. So all of this Literary and nationalistic revival then took a much more political form, and therefore, you got the emergence of Arab nationalism. Speaker 2: They had arrived at the conclusion that remaining in the Ottoman Empire was becoming hopeless, this, that they couldn't actually share power with the Turks, and they began thinking of having their own Speaker 0: By the summer of 1915, British intelligence confirmed that the Arab nationalist movement was the breakthrough the government was looking for. Britain and her French ally Dispatched officers to sound out Arab leaders. Speaker 2: Both the French and the British started, You could say seducing various local Arab leaders that if you side with us, we'll give you your independence, so why don't you leave the Ottomans? And various people were tempted as a result. If they they thought they could actually gain independence, why not Side with the Europeans against the Ottomans. Speaker 0: The idea was to tempt the Arabs into a revolt against their Ottoman overlords And create a diversion which would tie down the central powers in the Middle East. Ironically, the impetus for such a diversion had come not From London but from the Arab world. In the Hejaz in Western Arabia, sheriff Hussein, its ruler, was set on extending his political and geographical domain. He believed he might be able to do it with the help of the British. In turn, the British were impressed by Sharif Hussein's family credentials as custodians of the holy places of Islam. Speaker 1: They call themselves Hashemites. They call the family Hashemites because that's the family or the tribe of the prophet Muhammad. They were the Bani Hashim, the sons of Hashim. So he was Sharif Hussein was the leader of the Hashemites. He was the person responsible for Mecca and Medina. And although he worked with the Ottomans before the First World War, once the First World War happened, he saw this was his chance. Speaker 0: A chance too for the British who saw support sheriff Hussein as a way to threaten the sultan's hold on the caliphate, the political leadership of the Islamic world. Speaker 2: The British, because they were Fighting the Ottomans, and the Ottomans were claiming to be the real representatives of Islam. They wanted a counterforce, And the counterforce was represented by Sharif Hussein being a descendant of the prophet. But Sharif Hussein was speaking of liberating Arab lands, Building a new national state. He wanted to be king of the Arabs, not simply of Arabians. Speaker 0: In July 1915, Sharif Hussein smuggled a message to the British high commissioner in Cairo, sir Henry McMahon, Offering to raise a substantial Arab force against the Ottomans in return for British support for Arab independence. In the ensuing secret correspondence between the 2 men, Sharif Hussein was given to understand that he could expect British Support in achieving some of his ambitions in the event of an Ottoman defeat. His letter of October 26, 1915 Outline the main points of the arrangement. Speaker 6: The actual document itself is absolutely Riven with ambiguity. There's no doubt about that. The question is whether Hussein recognizes that. My sense of Saying is that he does recognize it. In other words, there is no wool being poured over his eyes because he's perfectly aware that if he's going to create A modern Arab empire, he's going to need some logistical economic Development and that can only come from the outside world. Speaker 0: Taking Britain's assurances of support at face value, Hussein, together with his sons Faisal and Abdullah, Amassed a sizable force. The new army was commanded by the young and charismatic Faisal, who had captured should the imagination of the Arab masses in the quest for Arab independence. Yet even as Hussein and Fizal mobilized their troops, the British were preparing to sell them short. Back in London in the spring of 1916, Britain was negotiating with France about the future shape of the Middle East. Behind closed doors, sir Mark Sykes of the British Foreign Office had been meeting his French opposite number, Francois Georges Picot. Britain knew it was vital to offer the French a stake in the spoils of the Ottoman Empire should they win the war. Speaker 7: There was an awareness on the British side that they had made such huge sacrifices that one couldn't just ignore, the French ambitions, and the French were determined to have their historical peace of the Levant. Speaker 0: Pouring over a map of the Levant, Sykes and Pico personally drew in the areas they wished to see under their control. Their secret deal amounted to the virtual carve up of the Middle East. In area A for the French and area B for the British, the imperialists intended to exercise power indirectly. They would appoint advisers and take charge of the finances in their respective spheres of influence. Then there was the area colored blue which was to be directly controlled by France. This included what was then known as Greater Syria where the French traditionally had commercial and religious interests. As for the area colored pink known as Iraq With its strategic ports, railways and oil, this was to be under British rule. The area, colored yellow, represented Palestine and was envisaged as an international zone except for Haifa. Speaker 2: What the British wanted was the oil of Iraq, and they concentrated on getting Iraq and getting away from Iraq to the Mediterranean in order to transport this oil. So they got Haifa on the Palestinian coast, and they got most of Iraq. Speaker 7: The Sykes PICA agreement was a pretty shameful document, and I wouldn't attempt to Defended, but it was drawn up by people who were sort of operating under the old, kind of balance of power considerations in an imperial, frame of mind. Speaker 0: Unaware of these Secret dealings behind their backs. Hussein and Faisal proclaimed independence. And in June 1916, attacked the Turkish Troops. The Arab revolt against the Ottomans had begun. The Turkish garrison at Mecca was soon overrun, and the Seaport at Jidda seized. By 1917, Hussein and Faisal's forces had pushed North and engaged the Ottoman Turks along the Hejaz Railway. The British saw the Arab Revolt as part of its strategy for creating a military diversion against the central powers. In a pincer movement, Britain had launched a campaign from the southwest to ensure control of the Suez Canal and the Levant. And from the southeast, it was fighting to secure the oil wells of Iraq. All this to attack the Central Powers at their weakest point, The Ottoman Empire. Speaker 2: The Arabs hitched their fortunes to the British. They considered themselves to be fighting with the allies. But at the same time, they were not merged into the British Army, That they continue to act as an independent army called the Northern Army. Speaker 0: While the Arab army advanced northwards, Britain's general Allenby had crossed the Suez Canal. And by the spring of 1917, his forces had reached the frontier of Palestine. The war in Europe, however, was still not going well for Britain. The attempted push through the German lines of the Somme had produced little territorial gain. And the cost in lives was colossal. In London, there had been a change of leadership. The new prime minister, Lloyd George, felt that the Allied war effort needed a fresh impetus. Although America had so far been neutral in the war, Lloyd George was convinced that could be changed. He believed there was 1 powerful group which might influence the American government. Speaker 3: Lloyd George thought that The American decision, whether to join or not would depend critically on public opinion, And the Jewish support could tilt the scales in one direction or or the other. Speaker 5: You've got to remember that the British foreign office Greatly overestimate the political power of international Jewry, particularly the wealthy, financial, and commercial, Jewish elites. Speaker 6: What is extraordinary about this situation is that here you have, particularly the British, Seeing the Jewish world as one collective monolithic entity. And in that sense, They start looking at the role of the Jews in the war as being something which might be important. And from the point of view of the Allies, something else quite remarkable, this monolithic collective entity is pro German. Speaker 0: Many Jews in the upper echelons of German society did indeed have close connections to the Kaiser's foreign office. A new Jewish nationalist movement, Zionism, had also been able to establish its headquarters in Berlin. Zionism had originated in the 18 eighties after Theodore Herzl published a book espousing the virtues of a Jewish state. This caused a sensation amongst Jewish intellectuals in Germany, Austria, and Russia who shared Herzl's outrage at the escalation of anti Jewish Speaker 3: The end of 19th century saw the rise of anti Semitism all over Europe, in Austria, In Germany, in France, but particularly in Eastern Europe, in Poland, and in Russia. And the pogrom against the Jews in Russia gave rise to the establishment of The lovers of Zion societies in a number of Russian cities who started to promote and to finance and to sponsor colonization, immigration to Palestine. Herzl came to the conclusion that the Jews were not safe anywhere in Europe, And the only solution was for the Jews to have a state of their own over which they could exercise sovereignty and where they would not be A minority. Speaker 0: What had also given Zionism its appeal was the way in which it fitted in to historic Jewish aspirations. Scattered throughout the world since the destruction of the Jerusalem temple in the 1st century AD, many Jews had cherished the idea of returning one day to what their scriptures had told them was the promised land. In fact, there had already been a small community of indigenous Jews in Palestine. But even when some European Jews established settlements throughout the late 19th century, the whole Jewish community, by 1914, Constituted barely 8% of the population. The Zionist leader in Britain, Chaim Weizmann, had been lobbying the government for a guarantee that in the event of an Ottoman defeat, it would support Jewish emigration to Palestine. By early 1917, Lloyd George's view of Jews as globally influential convinced him that Zionism was another nationalist movement which should be co opted to the Allied cause. In March, Mark Sykes began negotiations with Weizmann. Speaker 6: There is a a bee in the bonnet of people like Mark Sykes, But actually, the Jews do ultimately look to each other and look to their own interest. And if that interest As they are being told by Weitzman is, what we really want is Palestine. They're prepared to believe it. They're prepared to go along with it. Speaker 0: As negotiations with Weizmann continued over the following months, The war deteriorated rapidly for the Allies. The German submarine campaign was seriously weakening Britain's merchant fleet. And although America had entered the war on the Allied side, President Woodrow Wilson was not yet willing to supply a significant number of troops. Britain's latest attempt to keep up the pressure on the Western Front soon became came bogged down in the muddy trenches of Passchendaele. As thousands of young men's lives were wasted in another fruitless campaign, morale amongst the soldiers plummeted. Amongst the soldiers plummeted. But the most serious threat to the Allied war machine came from the east. Russia was on the verge of collapse. After massive defeats at the hands of the Germans, the war weary country was disintegrating with food shortages, strikes, and demonstrations. When the czar was deposed in a revolution, Britain and France again greatly alarmed. Speaker 5: The point is that once Russia and its war effort begins to collapse, Essentially, the Germans have won the First World War unless they bring the Americans in. There's no way that the British and the French, on their own, I'll ever get to defeat Germany. Speaker 0: In October, the British government received an intelligence report suggesting that Jews were a significant influence in the leadership of the Bolshevik Party, the New revolutionary movement emerging as the dominant force in Russia. Lloyd George feared that these communists would take Russia out of the war. With the Americans still refusing to commit sufficient forces, he knew it It was time to act. He instructed his foreign secretary, Arthur Balfour, to issue a pledge to capture the hearts and minds of the Jewish People. Speaker 8: His Majesty's government view with favor the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people and will use their best endeavors to facilitate the achievements of this object. Speaker 0: The Balfour Declaration was issued on November 2, 1917, just as British forces were occupying Palestine. Speaker 3: I would say that the Balfour Declaration has to be understood not as an idealistic gesture, but It has to be understood within the framework of British imperial policy, and Lloyd George Was the main instigator of that, declaration because he believed that it would serve Britain's interests. Speaker 0: But this was also the first time that any major European power had given official backing for the Zionist goal of making Palestine into a Jewish homeland. Yet sheriff Hussein had understood that Palestine had been promised as part of his deal Arab independence. Anticipating Arab outrage at the prospect of a Jewish homeland in a largely Arab province, The Balfour Declaration had also stated that Speaker 8: Nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non Jewish communities in Palestine. Speaker 0: The declaration, nonetheless, appeared to indicate British support for Jewish immigration. Speaker 2: There were only a mere 80,000 out of Some like 700,000 people in Palestine who were Jews. The Indigenous inhabitants of Palestine were referred to as non Jewish inhabitants, and that that Palestine was being identified Even at that stage, as a Jewish land, and all the others had no defined identity. They were simply non Jewish. Speaker 3: The Balfour Declaration was what it says, A declaration. It wasn't a treaty. It wasn't a signed agreement. It was A declaration in support of the establishment of a national home for the Jewish people in Palestine. Speaker 0: In fact, the only treaty Britain had signed in regard to Palestine was with the French, The secret Sykes Picot Agreement. On November 7th, within a few days of the Balfour Declaration, the Bolsheviks took power in Russia. Lord George hoped that it would have the desired effect of appeasing the Jews in communist leadership. Speaker 6: What is it that they supposedly so want as Jews? Palestine. Now the whole argument is is totally logical. It's a nonsense argument because these particular people, if one were to think of people like Trotsky or Zinoviev or Yaffe, Some of the key Jewish leaders in the Russian Revolution, the the November Revolution, these these people, of course, are internationalists. Speaker 3: There were 15 to 20 Jews in the higher echelons of the Bolshevik party. Most of them were anti Zionist. And after they came to power, they, soon after they came to power, they issued a declaration to say that Zionism is a capitalist ploy, a capitalist idea. Speaker 0: The wildly inaccurate intelligence report on which Lloyd George based his strategy was to have major implications for Britain. Within weeks, Russia's new leaders did exactly the opposite of what he had expected. Not only did they pull out of the war, They opened up the archives of the czar's foreign office and published the secret treaties. The very treaties Britain had engineered with her allies to carve up the Ottoman Empire, and to which Russia had been privy. Speaker 5: That, of course, is a very great embarrassment to the Western Allies because the Allies have been doing all sorts of deals behind the scenes in which they have handed out to each other large sections of the world, meanwhile, Openly preaching that they are fighting the war in defense of democracy and, of course, also Telling among others, the Arabs, that they are supporters of self determination for the peoples of the Ottoman Empire. Speaker 1: Publication of secret treaties by the Bolsheviks certainly create an enormous suspicion in the Arab world, and this meant that the Sharif Hussein and the other Wait a minute. What's going on? What a, why are you not giving us independence? And secondly, why are you dividing us up into zone a and zone b? And at that point, of course, the Arabs realized that not only with the had the British got their own particular interests, for example, in the ports of Palestine or in Iraq, but that they had promised other things to the French. Speaker 0: Amid Arab confusion and suspicion, general Allenby entered Jerusalem on foot together with Sykes, Pico, and a number of other allied notables. His British led forces had captured the holy city in December 1917. The leaders of the Arab Revolt, however, were nowhere to be seen. Fearing that Hussein and Faisal might lose heart, the British government forwarded a message to them reiterating British commitment to Arab independence. Speaker 8: The Arab race will be given full opportunity of once again forming a nation in the world. This can only be achieved by the Adams themselves uniting, and Great Britain and her allies will pursue a policy with this ultimate unity in you. Speaker 0: Hussein stayed loyal to the Allied cause, still prepared to accept Britain's word on Arab independence, Although he spoke of settling accounts after the war. From Alain Bay's point of view, He continued to rely on Arab support in the war against the Ottomans. But now that Jerusalem had been occupied by the British, 1 party seized the initiative. In April 1918, I'm Weizmann and the International Zionist Commission traveled to Palestine to lay the foundation for a Hebrew university. Their hope was that it would become the intellectual hub of Zionism. Weitzman's visit, however, caused widespread alarm and indignation among the Arab population. And when he and the chief rabbi of Jerusalem met general Allenby, It looked as if Britain was preparing to honor the Balfour Declaration. 6 months later, Allenby's forces entered Damascus With their ally, Faisal's northern army, they had pushed the Ottoman troops north through Palestine into Syria. Speaker 2: The Arab revolt did contribute To the victory of the allies, first of all, it protected British flank in Palestine. Second, it kept a number of Turkish and German troops preoccupied. And third, the the British could I have never legitimized what they were doing unless they had the blessing of a particular Arab force. Speaker 0: On the 3rd October, the people of Damascus Flocked to Faisal's victory parade. If he was to seize power, he knew it was of great importance to make his presence felt And to be seen by the Arab people as their liberator. Later the same day, however, Faisal met with General Allenby At the Victoria Hotel in Damascus, Allenby warned him that his rule in Syria would be limited. Speaker 2: The British, by that time, knew that they were going to hand over Syria to the French. So they couldn't actually accept Faisal as a legitimate ruler. All they could do is to pay him, his salary and the expenses of his army and his administration. Speaker 0: Undaunted by Allenby's his warnings, Faisal assumed the title of governor of Damascus. With the support of his father, Sheriff Hussein, He set about creating a power base for their goal of an independent Arab state. On the 31st October, the Ottomans were finally defeated. And at 11 o'clock on the 11th November 1918, the guns fell silent in Europe as the war with the Central Powers came to an end. The peace conference at Versailles began in January 1919. Representatives of the victorious allies, such as the French prime minister, Thomasin, and the American president, Woodrow Wilson, gathered to sort out what was to be done with the Former territories of the defeated empires. Now the liberal use of promises by the British government had to be prioritized. Speaker 4: They did indeed make pledges to the Arabs, but they also made pledges to the Jews. And they also made pledges to the French and the Russians and everybody else. And these people saw the world as an imperial world. Not only did they want to carve up the Middle East, they wanted to carve up Russia. They thought this was the last great moment in which the imperial powers would be able to sit down and grab what was going, particularly since there was no one to stop them. Speaker 0: But Britain and her old ally, France, were up against the American president Woodrow Wilson's vision of a new world order, which promoted national self determination. Speaker 2: Once independence had seemed to be a possibility That this principle of self determination, supported by the Americans, was going to be offered to All those who were to be liberated from former empires like the Habsburgs and the Ottomans. What the Palestinians wanted was an independent state. Speaker 0: In fact, Faisal had come from Damascus to plead the Arab cause. But the future of Palestine and the Middle East formed part of Britain's pledge to France in the Sykes Picoca Carver. In the event, Woodrow Wilson's principles about self determination were forgotten when it came to the people of the Middle East. Britain and France were free to go ahead with their agreement. But what of the promises Britain had made to the Jews regarding Palestine? Foreign secretary Arthur Balfour, in a confidential memo during the Versailles peace talks with America, France, and Italy, wrote. Speaker 8: The 4 great powers are committed to Zionism. And Zionism be it right or wrong, good or bad is rooted in age long traditions. In present needs in future hopes, a far profounder import than the desires and prejudices of the 700,000 Arabs who now inhabit that ancient land. Speaker 0: That might sound like a warm endorsement of Zionism. Yet further in the postwar memorandum, Balfour hints at a much more cynical agenda. Speaker 8: So far as Palestine is concerned, The powers have made no declaration of policy, which at least in letter, they have not always intended to violate. Speaker 0: The Versailles peace conference was concluded on June 28, 1919, with the creation of the League of Nations. The 1st global institution for peace and security. Its covenant provided that the Arab and other territories ceded by the defeated Ottoman Empire should be administered by mandates which meant in effect that Britain and France were given the authority to impose their rule over the Arab territories. On November 21, 1919, Francois Georges Picot, the co architect of the Sykes Picot agreement, and the French general, Guro, arrived in Beirut. And so began the imposition of the French mandate for Syria and Lebanon. The British Forces who had occupied the region since ousting the Ottoman Turks during the last months of the war were handing over power to the French, thus fulfilling their wartime pledge. Faisal, who had been the governor of Damascus now for 16 months, had been consolidating his position. When he was proclaimed king by the Syrian National Congress, the French were incensed and general Guro sent in his troops. By August 7, 1920, Faisel had been deposed and had to Faisal of a single independent state were now a distant memory for the Europeans. Speaker 1: The whole issue of spheres of influence meant that What appeared what was at first appeared to be a willingness to accept a single Arab state was in fact seriously diluted. And then on top of that, of course, the very fact of there being at French area and a British area meant that in effect, this was the seed of partition. So you had both Independence was denied, but also the unity of this area was denied. Speaker 0: The boundaries and governments of the Middle Eastern states that emerged bore the unmistakable the French half of the previously Ottoman province of Greater Syria became the mandate for Lebanon and Syria. The other half became the British mandate for Transjordan and Palestine. In the east, the Ottoman area of Mesopotamia, which included the oil fields of Mersour, was given to Britain as the mandate for Iraq. Speaker 2: So this was basically The importance of the Sykes Picot agreement, to divide what is called the fertile crescent between Iraq and Syria and let Britain get access to the oil of the area and be able to exploit it in the future. Speaker 0: But British rule was initially rejected by the Iraqi people until Faisal was installed as king in July 1921. Britain hoped the limited power it devolved to him would serve to placate the frustrated demands for Arab independence. But sheriff Hussein expected more from the British. More from the British. Speaker 2: He never gave up the idea that the British had promised him independence, not only in Arabia, but in Syria and Iraq as well. And he wanted the British to fulfill their Speaker 0: Sheriff Hussein's dream of an Arab kingdom ruled by the Hashemites was only partially fulfilled. For although his other son, Abdullah, became King of Transjordan, their old rival, Ibn Saud, swept the Hashemites out of Hejaz when he conquered the Shemites out of Hejaz when he conquered the whole of the Arabian Peninsula. In Jerusalem, An administration was established by the British in the spring of 1920. There were no plans for devolving power in Palestine. Palestine was a land sacred to 3 religions. Jews were a small minority who had lived harmoniously with Christians and the much larger community of Muslims for 100 of years. But the Balfour declaration, promising Jews a homeland in had been incorporated into the British mandate at Versailles. Palestine was thus to be opened for new European Jewish immigration. With celebrations and parades in support of Zionist activities. It seemed as if the British were going to honor their pledges to the Jews and ignore Palestinian hopes of independence. Speaker 3: The Arabs Had a strong case, but very poor advocates. The Zionists had a case. It wasn't as strong as that of the local Arabs, but they had brilliant advocates. Zionism is one of the greatest public relations success stories of the 20th century, and Chaim Weizmann Exemplified these traditional Jewish skills of advocacy and, persuasion. Speaker 0: Some of these skills were clearly in evidence when Weizmann and various Zionist groups helped finance land purchases and the building of settlements for immigrant Jews. At the same time, Political and security organizations were created to support the emerging Jewish homeland. The Arab community in Palestine was incensed. Speaker 2: The Palestinians couldn't conceive their country being divided or given away to Another community, which had nothing to do with the Middle East in the 1st place and was almost wholly European at the time. So to them, it seemed absurd that 600 to 700,000 should give up their land, their homes, their villages, their towns, and hand them over to a minority, which was dispersed, throughout Palestine. And Palestine, after all, is named after its people, who are the Palestinians. Speaker 0: In 1925, Arthur Balfour toured the new Jewish settlements in Palestine. Although he was fated as a hero of the Zionist cause, the immigration of European Jews was to have unforeseen consequences for British rule in Palestine. Speaker 3: I believe that the Balfour Declaration was one of the most serious mistakes in British imperial history. It, committed Britain to, support of Jewish nationalism in Palestine after the war, and, it did not, produced any immediate benefits for Britain. Speaker 6: Without the Balfour Declaration, There could have been no genuine development of a Jewish national home, and the follow through In 1948, where you get the creation of a state of Israel, simply would not have happened. It it requires the umbrella of the British to be there, in effect, to support the emerging Jewish national home militarily at the bottom line. The very fact There are British troops, British policemen there to protect the Jewish communities is ultimately central to the situation. It could not have been done in any other way. Speaker 0: Throughout the 1930s and forties, the years of Nazi persecution in the Holocaust. Jewish immigration to Palestine increased rapidly. But what was seen by the Arabs As an alien incursion and the Jews as a fulfillment of historic rights led to polarization and violence. In response to terrorist acts by Arabs, Britain restricted the immigration. But the policy only stimulated Jewish terrorism. Against this background, Britain relinquished its mandate. And the state of Israel was born in 1948. When the first of several wars between the new state and its Arab neighbors began, thousands of Palestinian Arabs fled their homeland. Thus, the strategies employed by Britain to win the First World War Inadversely left a deep divide between Arab and Jew. Speaker 3: The most serious Consequences of British policy during the war was the encouragement of Arab nationalism and Jewish nationalism. And in the aftermath of the First World War, Britain was left With this legacy of double dealing and of betrayal, which was to haunt her for a long, long time. Speaker 1: Clearly, it played a role in dividing the Arab world into different states, in allowing the establishment of the state of Israel and in frustrating Arab desires. But if what happened in in Sykes Picot and everything else when the First World War is used as an excuse for the problems of the Middle East now, I think that would be a mistake. But, yes, the roots of what we see today Certainly arose from the double dealing of the 1st World War and from the frustrated expectations of that time.

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

The Cabal — Aka the Death Cult… 👇🏼

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

The Cabal - Royals still rule us... >The Bloodline< House Wettin, aka House Coburg and Saxe Gotha is a supremely powerful Germanic medieval bloodline dating back to 900AD. All the monarchs of Europe are either directly descended or directly related to this bloodline. This powerful cabal of royals has (throughout history) ruled the thrones of many European countries, including Portugal, Bulgaria, Poland, Germany, Russia, Liechtenstein. And they still rule the thrones of key European countries such as the United Kingdom, Belgium (HQ of EU) and the Netherlands to this day. They (via their intelligence agencies) secretly control everything in the western world. Many people view elite European and American oligarchs as the "cabal," but the truth is that Royals are the top of the food chain - legally more powerful than all oligarchs, politicians, and generals combined. They even control the United States via their corrupt deal with the CIA and FBI - blackmailing, bribing, or assassinating anyone who dares to get in their way (including Presidents).

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

How they pull it off… 👇🏼

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

< Black Ops 101 > The Dark Truth About the CIA ☠️ FULL THREAD 🧵 Many people think that the CIA is a patriotic organization that protects Americans from danger, and informs the President about what's happening in the world so he can make good decisions. But that couldn't be further from the truth. The truth is that the CIA is a vicious paramilitary mafia, that rigs elections, overthrows governments, kills people, and manipulates our presidents into doing their bidding. They are the world's foremost experts in lying, cheating, and stealing from other countries. They sow chaos, degeneracy, corruption, and violence everywhere they go. 🥷🏽Uses Terrorists & Criminals as Assassins 💰Blackmails & Bribes Politicians Worldwide 💵Funded By Slavery & Drug-Dealing 👑Uses Authority of the British Crown How It Started 🔥 The CIA was created by British Intelligence during WW2, when MI6 came over and taught Americans the ruthless tactics they had been developing for centuries.

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

The only people to admit funding Terrorism and get away with it is the Bank of England… 👇🏼

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

These people have COVERED UP every investigation related to Terrorism Financing through the Bank of England > BCCI > Hogan Lovells > Neustar > Ericsson It's all connected and they're pushing us into War because they've been caught red handed with direct ties to Iran and 9/11 💯 https://t.co/tQ1PsoWjYC

Video Transcript AI Summary

The Bank of England, acting as a financial regulator, attracted banks to London in the past. One such bank was BCCI, which grew rapidly but eventually went bankrupt due to financial fraud and terrorist financing. Whistleblowers had contacted the Bank of England, but no action was taken. The Bank of England's governor at the time defended the lack of intervention, stating that closing banks for fraud would leave fewer banks. The lenient regulation and secrecy in London attracted more banks than any other financial center. British offshore centers, including trusts, were established to attract global capital with strong secrecy laws. Trusts allow assets to be separated from their owners, making them difficult to tax or trace. These offshore arrangements hold trillions of dollars of assets.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: At the heart of the City of London stands the Bank of England. The Bank of England is not just a central bank. It is also a financial regulator. At the demise of empire, the Bank of England used this regulatory authority to help attract the world's banks to London. In 1972, The Bank of England issued a licence to the Bank of Credit and Commerce International, which set up its head office in London. Within 10 years, BCCI grew into the 7th largest bank in the world. 10 years later, BCCI was bankrupt. Speaker 1: The deputy director of the CIA, Richard Kerr, said late today that the CIA did use BCCI To support CIA activities overseas. Speaker 0: But BCCI had not just collaborated with the world's intelligence services. It had also engaged in extensive financial fraud, money laundering, and terrorist financing. Speaker 2: BCCI constituted international global crime of Speaker 3: a level that boggles the mind. BCCI was Financing terrorism, the Bank of England knew it says the report. But instead of supervising it properly, it tried to prevent the Then the bank's collapse. Speaker 2: I am saying very directly that the Bank of England had sufficient information in front of it to close BCCI, 15 months earlier than it did, millions of depositors were hurt in that process. Speaker 0: Numerous whistle blowers from BCCI had contacted the Bank of England, yet the Bank of England did nothing. Speaker 4: The Bank of England had plenty of time to intervene and investigate, but it did not do so because the tradition at that time, What still survives is that a while actually, you know, you have to just kind of send hints and talk over lunch tables with the chaps, Regulating other chaps, and all would be well. Speaker 0: Robin Lee Pemberton, the governor of the Bank of England at the time of the collapse BCCI commented. The present system of supervision has served the community well. If we close down a bank Every time you found an incidence of fraud, you would have rather fewer banks than we do at the moment. London was a place for banks to engage in business that was not allowed elsewhere. Where senior bankers did not have to worry about the consequences of their actions. This is one of the reasons why today, there are more banks in London than in any other financial center. Speaker 5: In Britain, nobody goes to jail. No bankers go to jail. They generally don't. They are a protected species, and that is part of the offshore Sure business model of the UK is to say, we will protect you. We will bring your money here. We will look after you. We're not gonna put you in prison. We'll let you do what you want. Speaker 0: Light touch regulation was one way of attracting business to London. Another was secrecy. From the 19 sixties onwards, City of London Institutions began to establish offshore branches in former outpost of the British Empire. Their aim was to create offshore centers with strong secrecy legislation in order to attract capital from across the globe. Speaker 5: Swiss banking secrecy is the most famous, the most well known, you know, you put your money in a Swiss bank and they won't they promise to tell anybody, and that's one kind of secrecy. But another kind of secrecy, which is very British, is the trust. And the trust is a very, slippery, complicated, and devious mechanism. Trusts emerge, the legend has it, from the time of the crusades when the knights would go off and fight in foreign lands, and they would leave their assets In the care of trusted stewards. What trusts do ultimately is they play with the concept of ownership. Ownership is not such a simple thing. So the settler, the knight in this case, would hand over the assets to Someone who these days would be called a trustee, it's often a lawyer. Legally, you are separated from those assets. They're not yours anymore. There's a barrier. You can't be taxed on them. You can't be nobody's gonna find anything about your connection to these assets. Speaker 0: In Britain's offshore jurisdictions, No qualifications are necessary to be a trustee. Anyone can set up a trust and act as a trustee. There is no registry of trusts. There are no bodies to certify that a trust has been set up. Speaker 6: The only persons who know about the creation of this agreement are The trustee and the settler. There's no obligation to register it. There is no financial reporting obligation of trusts. They're not required to put annual statements onto account anywhere. So, actually, trusts are, To all intents and purposes, invisible arrangements. Speaker 0: Economist John Christiansen was an economic adviser to the secrecy jurisdiction of Jersey for 10 years. Speaker 6: We're not talking about a few million. We're talking now about 1,000,000,000, 1,000,000,000,000 of dollars of copper, which apparently belong to nobody. For tax purposes and for other purposes, they belong to nobody. Everything, works of arts, gold bullion, horse racehorses, cars, real estate, Not just financial assets, but a whole load of nonfinancial assets belong to these trusts, sitting there, belonging to nobody. Now think that one through, because we are talking about maybe as much as $50,000,000,000,000 of assets sitting offshore behind these instruments.

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

They funded the Nazis through American Corporations after they moved them all to Delaware from NJ in the early 1900’s during the “Spanish flu epidemic”. They also funded Zionism and provided the mandate for Israel. (The Rothschilds & Crown merged through Titles of Nobility)

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

All of Prince Philip’s sisters married Nazis 🪃 Here’s the late Queen Elizabeth II with her uncle Edward — King Edward the VIII (also head of the Church of England) just doing what Fake British-German Nazi’s do 👀 1933 — So many Royal coincidences suddenly coming to light… ☀️ https://t.co/osuYR8O0UD

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

Follow the Money… 👇🏼

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

Reorganized Around Oligarchs Jewish Banking Oligarchs Christians were banned from becoming bankers in medieval Europe - so all banking was run by Jews. Royals used Jews as their "court factors" (aka chief bankers), because they were a small minority who faced extreme prejudice from the rest of the population, so they were reliant on royals for protection. Jews were stereotyped as not being loyal to any country, so MI6 reorganized itself around Jewish Oligarchs to obfuscate the British origin of it's activities. House Rothschild Rothschild was the Court Factor (chief banker) to a German royal in the Holy Roman Empire. His sons became the top bankers for every major government in Europe - eventually bailing out The Vatican, and the Central Bank of England - helping it monopolize its control over currency. They built & maintained a vast network of spies, saboteurs, smugglers, bankers, and businessmen across all of Europe, and became the preeminent super-oligarchs that MI6 was organized around in the early 1800's. The Rothschild's were also promoted to royalty and given "titles of nobility" (i.e. "Baron") for their service to the Empire. House Sasoon Sassoon's (Rothschild's of the Far East) were the wealthy Court Factors (chief bankers) to the Ottoman Pasha of Baghdad. After the Pasha was overthrown, they moved to India, where the British Crown granted them monopoly rights on all Indian cotton, silk, and opium production. When China tried to outlaw their opium dealing (because it was wreaking havoc on the Chinese economy and population), the Sassoon's asked the British Royals to retaliate - and they eagerly agreed. Kicking off the Opium Wars - where the British Empire destroyed China, seized Hong Kong, and forced them to legalize opium again. House Schiff Born in Frankfurt (roommate of the Rothschild's), Schiff was a fabulously wealthy banker who helped establish, Citibank, Wells Fargo, Western Union, Union Pacific, and the Federal Reserve. He financed the American railroads, and the Japanese military efforts against Tsarist Russia (a target of the British Empire). Working with the British MI6, Schiff secretly helped fund the Emma Goldman archaist networks (who assassinated leaders around the world) and the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia. Schiff arranged the Rothschild (Bank of England) money that put US oligarchs Rockefeller & Carnegie on the map.

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

Pop into our Spaces if you want to talk more about this thread… https://t.co/GhslBpoGHG

@Vltra_MK — Michael Rae Khoury

Posted - December 19, 2023 at 1:19 AM

Saved - December 19, 2023 at 1:40 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

The posts discuss the influence and power of the British Crown, highlighting connections to Israel/Palestine and the support of Saudi Arabia. They also mention the Cabal, a powerful bloodline that has ruled European thrones and allegedly controls intelligence agencies. The CIA is described as a paramilitary mafia that manipulates presidents and engages in illegal activities. The posts also touch on Saudi Arabia's barbaric regime and the British Crown's involvement in funding Nazis and controlling Zionism.

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

Follow the History of the British Crown 👑 — all roads lead back to their rule — incl. & especially Israel/Palestine [British Mandates] (see follow up threads)… 👇🏼 Saud/Rothschild/Soros = all 🇬🇧|👑 backing Yet people worship Kings & Queens… 💯 Does anyone stop & ask why!? 🤷🏽‍♂️

@georgegalloway - George Galloway

If you had told me that even in this cruel world a modern state would get away with slaughtering over ten thousand children in ten weeks, while still retaining the support of most western governments and blanket cover from the mainstream media I simply wouldn't have believed you... #GazaGenocide

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

Thread: The Cabal - Royals still rule us... https://x.com/Vltra_MK/status/1678949429099782145?s=20

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

The Cabal - Royals still rule us... >The Bloodline< House Wettin, aka House Coburg and Saxe Gotha is a supremely powerful Germanic medieval bloodline dating back to 900AD. All the monarchs of Europe are either directly descended or directly related to this bloodline. This powerful cabal of royals has (throughout history) ruled the thrones of many European countries, including Portugal, Bulgaria, Poland, Germany, Russia, Liechtenstein. And they still rule the thrones of key European countries such as the United Kingdom, Belgium (HQ of EU) and the Netherlands to this day. They (via their intelligence agencies) secretly control everything in the western world. Many people view elite European and American oligarchs as the "cabal," but the truth is that Royals are the top of the food chain - legally more powerful than all oligarchs, politicians, and generals combined. They even control the United States via their corrupt deal with the CIA and FBI - blackmailing, bribing, or assassinating anyone who dares to get in their way (including Presidents).

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

< Black Ops 101 > - how they pull it off... https://x.com/Vltra_MK/status/1681632089085558787?s=20

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

< Black Ops 101 > The Dark Truth About the CIA ☠️ FULL THREAD 🧵 Many people think that the CIA is a patriotic organization that protects Americans from danger, and informs the President about what's happening in the world so he can make good decisions. But that couldn't be further from the truth. The truth is that the CIA is a vicious paramilitary mafia, that rigs elections, overthrows governments, kills people, and manipulates our presidents into doing their bidding. They are the world's foremost experts in lying, cheating, and stealing from other countries. They sow chaos, degeneracy, corruption, and violence everywhere they go. 🥷🏽Uses Terrorists & Criminals as Assassins 💰Blackmails & Bribes Politicians Worldwide 💵Funded By Slavery & Drug-Dealing 👑Uses Authority of the British Crown How It Started 🔥 The CIA was created by British Intelligence during WW2, when MI6 came over and taught Americans the ruthless tactics they had been developing for centuries.

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

Saudi Arabia - The Worlds Most Barbaric Regime (also empowered by the British Crown) https://qintel.pro/saudi-arabia/

Saudi Arabia | QINTELPRO qintel.pro

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

It’s all so obvious once you see it… 👇🏼

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

"How Britain Started the Arab-Israeli Conflict" 👀 This is a must-watch with all that's happening... 💯 (suggested at 1.5x speed)

Video Transcript AI Summary

The video discusses the origins of the Arab-Israeli conflict, tracing it back to British double dealing during World War I. The British made conflicting promises to both the Arabs and the Jews, leading to a legacy of bloodshed and determining the fate of the Middle East. The Sykes-Picot Agreement divided the region into French and British spheres of influence, while the Balfour Declaration supported the establishment of a Jewish homeland in Palestine. These actions created tensions between the Arab and Jewish communities, which eventually led to the establishment of the state of Israel and the displacement of Palestinian Arabs.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: The bitter struggle between Arab and Jew for control of the Holy Land has caused untold suffering in the Middle East for generations. It is often claimed that the crisis originated with Jewish immigration to Palestine and the foundation of the state Yet the roots of the conflict are to be found much earlier, In British double dealing during the First World War. This is a story of intrigue among rival empires, of misguided strategies and of how conflicting promises to Arab and Jew created a legacy of bloodshed which has determined the fate of the Middle East. Speaker 1: During the First World War, the British, the French, and the Russians had these secret plans to carve up the Ottoman Empire, because they believed that would balance out their imperial ambitions, but tough luck for the Turks, the Arabs, and anyone else who got in the way. Speaker 2: Certainly, all the seeds were planted then in the sense that it was the British who promised the Arabs independence on the one hand And, a Jewish homeland on the other, and you could not simply reconcile one With the other, Speaker 3: the British scattered promises to anyone who might be of some use To them without thinking about the consequences. So British duplicity, British double dealing went a long way to perpetuate the conflict in Palestine. Speaker 4: At the end of the day, when you're fighting a war, you are very liberal in what you're offering in terms of a post war settlement. When you get down to the conference table when the war has ended and you have to start honoring your agreements, you then have to decide what's in your interest or not, and it puts all the Middle East as a western flag for their power in India and their power in Asia in general. Speaker 0: The story of Britain's involvement in the Middle East and the ensuing struggle between Arab and Jew begins with her colonial past. At the beginning of 20th century, King Edward the 7th ruled over a vast empire with interests in every part Speaker 4: of the world. India became increasingly important because it was the 2nd pillar of British power in the world. Moving the Indian Army about was extremely important in extending British interests and British influence across the globe. And the Suez Canal was, of course, the quick way To do that, it's very important for the British shared geopolitical position to ensure the Suez Canal remains safe and secure. Speaker 0: With this aim in mind, Britain had become the only European power to establish a major foothold in the Middle East, in the principalities around the Persian Gulf, in Aden, and in Egypt. Britain had annexed Egypt from Turkey's Ottoman Empire in 18 82. And by the time it was made a protectorate in 1914, Cairo had become the center of British power in the Middle East. The presence of imperial troops in the region was of vital strategic importance. For the Ottoman Empire under Sultan Mohammed But the 5th was an alliance with Britain's much feared rival, Germany. Together with the Austro Hungarian Empire, these countries made up the Central Powers and pitted against them were the 3 allies, Britain, France and Russia. From the Ottoman capital, Constantinople in Turkey. The sultan ruled over the last of the great Islamic empires. It had been an almost terminal decline for decades. Yet the fate of the Ottoman Empire was to be sealed by the outbreak of the First World War in August 1914. In Europe, Germany's rapid advance was halted by Britain and France along the Austro front. In the east, Russia's war against Germany and Austria Hungary also reached deadlock. The powerful weapons of the industrial age were killing thousands of men in the trenches of every army. Speaker 5: All of the leading powers expected the war to be over within a matter of months. So in that sense, all of them are surprised at the end of 14, when not merely is the war going on, but it shows every sign of being likely to go on for a very long time. At that point, They began to think about new ways of winning the war. Speaker 0: Britain's prime minister, Asquith, felt that with the stalemate in Europe, it was essential to widen the conflict. Together with Foreign secretary, Lord Grey, minister for war, Lord Kitchener, and the first lord of the admiralty, Winston Churchill, they masterminded a complex strategy to undermine the Mine the central powers. Speaker 4: This was a global war, and the British saw the Middle East very much in a global context. The traditional British preference for sideshows, as people, unfavorably call it, the indirect strategy, The way of, attacking the soft underbelly, as Churchill called it, of the enemy. Speaker 0: And the soft underbelly was seen to be Turkey. Britain's secret plan involved, on the one hand, a military diversion, and on the other, a devious use of diplomacy through bribery, Subversion and double dealing, all these devices focused on the enemy's weakest link, Turkey's Ottoman Empire. Speaker 1: Diplomacy in general has always had a secret dimension to it. Whether where but where discretion ends and conspiracy begins is an open question. But during the period up to and during the First World War, there was a particularly intense set of negotiations and discussions between the major imperial powers, between the French, the Russians, and the British, in particular, cutting in the Italians as well about what would they do When the war was over and when the Ottoman Empire broke up. Speaker 0: The British government hoped that by striking a deal over the spoils of war, It would strengthen the alliance against the Central Powers. Amongst the allies, Russia had long sought access to the Mediterranean. In a secret treaty of March 1915, Britain and France offered What was to the czar a prize of vital geopolitical importance, Constantinople. Speaker 6: It is that key outlet into the wider world and into the Mediterranean. And it is the one thing, of course, the British and the French have been Attempting to prevent the Russians from achieving. So this is a complete This is this is the British, the French, and the Russians Coming to an agreement over something which was, up to this point, almost inconceivable. Speaker 0: Italy's King Vittoria Emmanuel is another target for bribery. Britain, France, and Russia tried to tempt Italy, a pro German state, to join the Allies. In April 1915, a secret treaty offered Italy a substantial bit of Ottoman real estate in Anatolia. Speaker 6: Again, it's another power coming into the equation and being offered territorial advancement which, in normal circumstances, would have been quite inconceivable. Speaker 0: The bribe worked. Italy joined the Allies and declared war on the Central Powers in August 1915. But Britain's strategy to undermine the enemy via the Ottoman Empire also required subversion. By using domestic opposition to weaken, maybe even destroy it, Britain exploited a new movement sweeping through the empire. Nationalism. Speaker 1: Nationalism in the sense of believing that there are peoples with a clear cultural identity and that these people should live independent. That idea spread to the Middle East as to other parts of the world in the latter part of 19th century. So you had the beginnings in the Ottoman Empire of a Turkish nationalism. Speaker 0: This came to a head when the young Turks power in a coup in 1908 and started to impose their language and culture on the Arabs of the empire. But this only reawakened an interest amongst Arabs in their own heritage. A 1000 years before, Arabs had brought the technology and literature of the east to the west. And their religion, Islam, had encompassed much of Asia, North Africa and Southwestern Europe. The idea of recovering that historic grandeur had remained in the consciousness of Arab intellectuals. By the start of the First World War, the antagonism between Arab and Turk had increased. Speaker 1: The very fact that the Turks were saying we want to have a unified empire meant the Arabs said, wait a minute. We're not part of this. So all of this Literary and nationalistic revival then took a much more political form, and therefore, you got the emergence of Arab nationalism. Speaker 2: They had arrived at the conclusion that remaining in the Ottoman Empire was becoming hopeless, this, that they couldn't actually share power with the Turks, and they began thinking of having their own Speaker 0: By the summer of 1915, British intelligence confirmed that the Arab nationalist movement was the breakthrough the government was looking for. Britain and her French ally Dispatched officers to sound out Arab leaders. Speaker 2: Both the French and the British started, You could say seducing various local Arab leaders that if you side with us, we'll give you your independence, so why don't you leave the Ottomans? And various people were tempted as a result. If they they thought they could actually gain independence, why not Side with the Europeans against the Ottomans. Speaker 0: The idea was to tempt the Arabs into a revolt against their Ottoman overlords And create a diversion which would tie down the central powers in the Middle East. Ironically, the impetus for such a diversion had come not From London but from the Arab world. In the Hejaz in Western Arabia, sheriff Hussein, its ruler, was set on extending his political and geographical domain. He believed he might be able to do it with the help of the British. In turn, the British were impressed by Sharif Hussein's family credentials as custodians of the holy places of Islam. Speaker 1: They call themselves Hashemites. They call the family Hashemites because that's the family or the tribe of the prophet Muhammad. They were the Bani Hashim, the sons of Hashim. So he was Sharif Hussein was the leader of the Hashemites. He was the person responsible for Mecca and Medina. And although he worked with the Ottomans before the First World War, once the First World War happened, he saw this was his chance. Speaker 0: A chance too for the British who saw support sheriff Hussein as a way to threaten the sultan's hold on the caliphate, the political leadership of the Islamic world. Speaker 2: The British, because they were Fighting the Ottomans, and the Ottomans were claiming to be the real representatives of Islam. They wanted a counterforce, And the counterforce was represented by Sharif Hussein being a descendant of the prophet. But Sharif Hussein was speaking of liberating Arab lands, Building a new national state. He wanted to be king of the Arabs, not simply of Arabians. Speaker 0: In July 1915, Sharif Hussein smuggled a message to the British high commissioner in Cairo, sir Henry McMahon, Offering to raise a substantial Arab force against the Ottomans in return for British support for Arab independence. In the ensuing secret correspondence between the 2 men, Sharif Hussein was given to understand that he could expect British Support in achieving some of his ambitions in the event of an Ottoman defeat. His letter of October 26, 1915 Outline the main points of the arrangement. Speaker 6: The actual document itself is absolutely Riven with ambiguity. There's no doubt about that. The question is whether Hussein recognizes that. My sense of Saying is that he does recognize it. In other words, there is no wool being poured over his eyes because he's perfectly aware that if he's going to create A modern Arab empire, he's going to need some logistical economic Development and that can only come from the outside world. Speaker 0: Taking Britain's assurances of support at face value, Hussein, together with his sons Faisal and Abdullah, Amassed a sizable force. The new army was commanded by the young and charismatic Faisal, who had captured should the imagination of the Arab masses in the quest for Arab independence. Yet even as Hussein and Fizal mobilized their troops, the British were preparing to sell them short. Back in London in the spring of 1916, Britain was negotiating with France about the future shape of the Middle East. Behind closed doors, sir Mark Sykes of the British Foreign Office had been meeting his French opposite number, Francois Georges Picot. Britain knew it was vital to offer the French a stake in the spoils of the Ottoman Empire should they win the war. Speaker 7: There was an awareness on the British side that they had made such huge sacrifices that one couldn't just ignore, the French ambitions, and the French were determined to have their historical peace of the Levant. Speaker 0: Pouring over a map of the Levant, Sykes and Pico personally drew in the areas they wished to see under their control. Their secret deal amounted to the virtual carve up of the Middle East. In area A for the French and area B for the British, the imperialists intended to exercise power indirectly. They would appoint advisers and take charge of the finances in their respective spheres of influence. Then there was the area colored blue which was to be directly controlled by France. This included what was then known as Greater Syria where the French traditionally had commercial and religious interests. As for the area colored pink known as Iraq With its strategic ports, railways and oil, this was to be under British rule. The area, colored yellow, represented Palestine and was envisaged as an international zone except for Haifa. Speaker 2: What the British wanted was the oil of Iraq, and they concentrated on getting Iraq and getting away from Iraq to the Mediterranean in order to transport this oil. So they got Haifa on the Palestinian coast, and they got most of Iraq. Speaker 7: The Sykes PICA agreement was a pretty shameful document, and I wouldn't attempt to Defended, but it was drawn up by people who were sort of operating under the old, kind of balance of power considerations in an imperial, frame of mind. Speaker 0: Unaware of these Secret dealings behind their backs. Hussein and Faisal proclaimed independence. And in June 1916, attacked the Turkish Troops. The Arab revolt against the Ottomans had begun. The Turkish garrison at Mecca was soon overrun, and the Seaport at Jidda seized. By 1917, Hussein and Faisal's forces had pushed North and engaged the Ottoman Turks along the Hejaz Railway. The British saw the Arab Revolt as part of its strategy for creating a military diversion against the central powers. In a pincer movement, Britain had launched a campaign from the southwest to ensure control of the Suez Canal and the Levant. And from the southeast, it was fighting to secure the oil wells of Iraq. All this to attack the Central Powers at their weakest point, The Ottoman Empire. Speaker 2: The Arabs hitched their fortunes to the British. They considered themselves to be fighting with the allies. But at the same time, they were not merged into the British Army, That they continue to act as an independent army called the Northern Army. Speaker 0: While the Arab army advanced northwards, Britain's general Allenby had crossed the Suez Canal. And by the spring of 1917, his forces had reached the frontier of Palestine. The war in Europe, however, was still not going well for Britain. The attempted push through the German lines of the Somme had produced little territorial gain. And the cost in lives was colossal. In London, there had been a change of leadership. The new prime minister, Lloyd George, felt that the Allied war effort needed a fresh impetus. Although America had so far been neutral in the war, Lloyd George was convinced that could be changed. He believed there was 1 powerful group which might influence the American government. Speaker 3: Lloyd George thought that The American decision, whether to join or not would depend critically on public opinion, And the Jewish support could tilt the scales in one direction or or the other. Speaker 5: You've got to remember that the British foreign office Greatly overestimate the political power of international Jewry, particularly the wealthy, financial, and commercial, Jewish elites. Speaker 6: What is extraordinary about this situation is that here you have, particularly the British, Seeing the Jewish world as one collective monolithic entity. And in that sense, They start looking at the role of the Jews in the war as being something which might be important. And from the point of view of the Allies, something else quite remarkable, this monolithic collective entity is pro German. Speaker 0: Many Jews in the upper echelons of German society did indeed have close connections to the Kaiser's foreign office. A new Jewish nationalist movement, Zionism, had also been able to establish its headquarters in Berlin. Zionism had originated in the 18 eighties after Theodore Herzl published a book espousing the virtues of a Jewish state. This caused a sensation amongst Jewish intellectuals in Germany, Austria, and Russia who shared Herzl's outrage at the escalation of anti Jewish Speaker 3: The end of 19th century saw the rise of anti Semitism all over Europe, in Austria, In Germany, in France, but particularly in Eastern Europe, in Poland, and in Russia. And the pogrom against the Jews in Russia gave rise to the establishment of The lovers of Zion societies in a number of Russian cities who started to promote and to finance and to sponsor colonization, immigration to Palestine. Herzl came to the conclusion that the Jews were not safe anywhere in Europe, And the only solution was for the Jews to have a state of their own over which they could exercise sovereignty and where they would not be A minority. Speaker 0: What had also given Zionism its appeal was the way in which it fitted in to historic Jewish aspirations. Scattered throughout the world since the destruction of the Jerusalem temple in the 1st century AD, many Jews had cherished the idea of returning one day to what their scriptures had told them was the promised land. In fact, there had already been a small community of indigenous Jews in Palestine. But even when some European Jews established settlements throughout the late 19th century, the whole Jewish community, by 1914, Constituted barely 8% of the population. The Zionist leader in Britain, Chaim Weizmann, had been lobbying the government for a guarantee that in the event of an Ottoman defeat, it would support Jewish emigration to Palestine. By early 1917, Lloyd George's view of Jews as globally influential convinced him that Zionism was another nationalist movement which should be co opted to the Allied cause. In March, Mark Sykes began negotiations with Weizmann. Speaker 6: There is a a bee in the bonnet of people like Mark Sykes, But actually, the Jews do ultimately look to each other and look to their own interest. And if that interest As they are being told by Weitzman is, what we really want is Palestine. They're prepared to believe it. They're prepared to go along with it. Speaker 0: As negotiations with Weizmann continued over the following months, The war deteriorated rapidly for the Allies. The German submarine campaign was seriously weakening Britain's merchant fleet. And although America had entered the war on the Allied side, President Woodrow Wilson was not yet willing to supply a significant number of troops. Britain's latest attempt to keep up the pressure on the Western Front soon became came bogged down in the muddy trenches of Passchendaele. As thousands of young men's lives were wasted in another fruitless campaign, morale amongst the soldiers plummeted. Amongst the soldiers plummeted. But the most serious threat to the Allied war machine came from the east. Russia was on the verge of collapse. After massive defeats at the hands of the Germans, the war weary country was disintegrating with food shortages, strikes, and demonstrations. When the czar was deposed in a revolution, Britain and France again greatly alarmed. Speaker 5: The point is that once Russia and its war effort begins to collapse, Essentially, the Germans have won the First World War unless they bring the Americans in. There's no way that the British and the French, on their own, I'll ever get to defeat Germany. Speaker 0: In October, the British government received an intelligence report suggesting that Jews were a significant influence in the leadership of the Bolshevik Party, the New revolutionary movement emerging as the dominant force in Russia. Lloyd George feared that these communists would take Russia out of the war. With the Americans still refusing to commit sufficient forces, he knew it It was time to act. He instructed his foreign secretary, Arthur Balfour, to issue a pledge to capture the hearts and minds of the Jewish People. Speaker 8: His Majesty's government view with favor the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people and will use their best endeavors to facilitate the achievements of this object. Speaker 0: The Balfour Declaration was issued on November 2, 1917, just as British forces were occupying Palestine. Speaker 3: I would say that the Balfour Declaration has to be understood not as an idealistic gesture, but It has to be understood within the framework of British imperial policy, and Lloyd George Was the main instigator of that, declaration because he believed that it would serve Britain's interests. Speaker 0: But this was also the first time that any major European power had given official backing for the Zionist goal of making Palestine into a Jewish homeland. Yet sheriff Hussein had understood that Palestine had been promised as part of his deal Arab independence. Anticipating Arab outrage at the prospect of a Jewish homeland in a largely Arab province, The Balfour Declaration had also stated that Speaker 8: Nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non Jewish communities in Palestine. Speaker 0: The declaration, nonetheless, appeared to indicate British support for Jewish immigration. Speaker 2: There were only a mere 80,000 out of Some like 700,000 people in Palestine who were Jews. The Indigenous inhabitants of Palestine were referred to as non Jewish inhabitants, and that that Palestine was being identified Even at that stage, as a Jewish land, and all the others had no defined identity. They were simply non Jewish. Speaker 3: The Balfour Declaration was what it says, A declaration. It wasn't a treaty. It wasn't a signed agreement. It was A declaration in support of the establishment of a national home for the Jewish people in Palestine. Speaker 0: In fact, the only treaty Britain had signed in regard to Palestine was with the French, The secret Sykes Picot Agreement. On November 7th, within a few days of the Balfour Declaration, the Bolsheviks took power in Russia. Lord George hoped that it would have the desired effect of appeasing the Jews in communist leadership. Speaker 6: What is it that they supposedly so want as Jews? Palestine. Now the whole argument is is totally logical. It's a nonsense argument because these particular people, if one were to think of people like Trotsky or Zinoviev or Yaffe, Some of the key Jewish leaders in the Russian Revolution, the the November Revolution, these these people, of course, are internationalists. Speaker 3: There were 15 to 20 Jews in the higher echelons of the Bolshevik party. Most of them were anti Zionist. And after they came to power, they, soon after they came to power, they issued a declaration to say that Zionism is a capitalist ploy, a capitalist idea. Speaker 0: The wildly inaccurate intelligence report on which Lloyd George based his strategy was to have major implications for Britain. Within weeks, Russia's new leaders did exactly the opposite of what he had expected. Not only did they pull out of the war, They opened up the archives of the czar's foreign office and published the secret treaties. The very treaties Britain had engineered with her allies to carve up the Ottoman Empire, and to which Russia had been privy. Speaker 5: That, of course, is a very great embarrassment to the Western Allies because the Allies have been doing all sorts of deals behind the scenes in which they have handed out to each other large sections of the world, meanwhile, Openly preaching that they are fighting the war in defense of democracy and, of course, also Telling among others, the Arabs, that they are supporters of self determination for the peoples of the Ottoman Empire. Speaker 1: Publication of secret treaties by the Bolsheviks certainly create an enormous suspicion in the Arab world, and this meant that the Sharif Hussein and the other Wait a minute. What's going on? What a, why are you not giving us independence? And secondly, why are you dividing us up into zone a and zone b? And at that point, of course, the Arabs realized that not only with the had the British got their own particular interests, for example, in the ports of Palestine or in Iraq, but that they had promised other things to the French. Speaker 0: Amid Arab confusion and suspicion, general Allenby entered Jerusalem on foot together with Sykes, Pico, and a number of other allied notables. His British led forces had captured the holy city in December 1917. The leaders of the Arab Revolt, however, were nowhere to be seen. Fearing that Hussein and Faisal might lose heart, the British government forwarded a message to them reiterating British commitment to Arab independence. Speaker 8: The Arab race will be given full opportunity of once again forming a nation in the world. This can only be achieved by the Adams themselves uniting, and Great Britain and her allies will pursue a policy with this ultimate unity in you. Speaker 0: Hussein stayed loyal to the Allied cause, still prepared to accept Britain's word on Arab independence, Although he spoke of settling accounts after the war. From Alain Bay's point of view, He continued to rely on Arab support in the war against the Ottomans. But now that Jerusalem had been occupied by the British, 1 party seized the initiative. In April 1918, I'm Weizmann and the International Zionist Commission traveled to Palestine to lay the foundation for a Hebrew university. Their hope was that it would become the intellectual hub of Zionism. Weitzman's visit, however, caused widespread alarm and indignation among the Arab population. And when he and the chief rabbi of Jerusalem met general Allenby, It looked as if Britain was preparing to honor the Balfour Declaration. 6 months later, Allenby's forces entered Damascus With their ally, Faisal's northern army, they had pushed the Ottoman troops north through Palestine into Syria. Speaker 2: The Arab revolt did contribute To the victory of the allies, first of all, it protected British flank in Palestine. Second, it kept a number of Turkish and German troops preoccupied. And third, the the British could I have never legitimized what they were doing unless they had the blessing of a particular Arab force. Speaker 0: On the 3rd October, the people of Damascus Flocked to Faisal's victory parade. If he was to seize power, he knew it was of great importance to make his presence felt And to be seen by the Arab people as their liberator. Later the same day, however, Faisal met with General Allenby At the Victoria Hotel in Damascus, Allenby warned him that his rule in Syria would be limited. Speaker 2: The British, by that time, knew that they were going to hand over Syria to the French. So they couldn't actually accept Faisal as a legitimate ruler. All they could do is to pay him, his salary and the expenses of his army and his administration. Speaker 0: Undaunted by Allenby's his warnings, Faisal assumed the title of governor of Damascus. With the support of his father, Sheriff Hussein, He set about creating a power base for their goal of an independent Arab state. On the 31st October, the Ottomans were finally defeated. And at 11 o'clock on the 11th November 1918, the guns fell silent in Europe as the war with the Central Powers came to an end. The peace conference at Versailles began in January 1919. Representatives of the victorious allies, such as the French prime minister, Thomasin, and the American president, Woodrow Wilson, gathered to sort out what was to be done with the Former territories of the defeated empires. Now the liberal use of promises by the British government had to be prioritized. Speaker 4: They did indeed make pledges to the Arabs, but they also made pledges to the Jews. And they also made pledges to the French and the Russians and everybody else. And these people saw the world as an imperial world. Not only did they want to carve up the Middle East, they wanted to carve up Russia. They thought this was the last great moment in which the imperial powers would be able to sit down and grab what was going, particularly since there was no one to stop them. Speaker 0: But Britain and her old ally, France, were up against the American president Woodrow Wilson's vision of a new world order, which promoted national self determination. Speaker 2: Once independence had seemed to be a possibility That this principle of self determination, supported by the Americans, was going to be offered to All those who were to be liberated from former empires like the Habsburgs and the Ottomans. What the Palestinians wanted was an independent state. Speaker 0: In fact, Faisal had come from Damascus to plead the Arab cause. But the future of Palestine and the Middle East formed part of Britain's pledge to France in the Sykes Picoca Carver. In the event, Woodrow Wilson's principles about self determination were forgotten when it came to the people of the Middle East. Britain and France were free to go ahead with their agreement. But what of the promises Britain had made to the Jews regarding Palestine? Foreign secretary Arthur Balfour, in a confidential memo during the Versailles peace talks with America, France, and Italy, wrote. Speaker 8: The 4 great powers are committed to Zionism. And Zionism be it right or wrong, good or bad is rooted in age long traditions. In present needs in future hopes, a far profounder import than the desires and prejudices of the 700,000 Arabs who now inhabit that ancient land. Speaker 0: That might sound like a warm endorsement of Zionism. Yet further in the postwar memorandum, Balfour hints at a much more cynical agenda. Speaker 8: So far as Palestine is concerned, The powers have made no declaration of policy, which at least in letter, they have not always intended to violate. Speaker 0: The Versailles peace conference was concluded on June 28, 1919, with the creation of the League of Nations. The 1st global institution for peace and security. Its covenant provided that the Arab and other territories ceded by the defeated Ottoman Empire should be administered by mandates which meant in effect that Britain and France were given the authority to impose their rule over the Arab territories. On November 21, 1919, Francois Georges Picot, the co architect of the Sykes Picot agreement, and the French general, Guro, arrived in Beirut. And so began the imposition of the French mandate for Syria and Lebanon. The British Forces who had occupied the region since ousting the Ottoman Turks during the last months of the war were handing over power to the French, thus fulfilling their wartime pledge. Faisal, who had been the governor of Damascus now for 16 months, had been consolidating his position. When he was proclaimed king by the Syrian National Congress, the French were incensed and general Guro sent in his troops. By August 7, 1920, Faisel had been deposed and had to Faisal of a single independent state were now a distant memory for the Europeans. Speaker 1: The whole issue of spheres of influence meant that What appeared what was at first appeared to be a willingness to accept a single Arab state was in fact seriously diluted. And then on top of that, of course, the very fact of there being at French area and a British area meant that in effect, this was the seed of partition. So you had both Independence was denied, but also the unity of this area was denied. Speaker 0: The boundaries and governments of the Middle Eastern states that emerged bore the unmistakable the French half of the previously Ottoman province of Greater Syria became the mandate for Lebanon and Syria. The other half became the British mandate for Transjordan and Palestine. In the east, the Ottoman area of Mesopotamia, which included the oil fields of Mersour, was given to Britain as the mandate for Iraq. Speaker 2: So this was basically The importance of the Sykes Picot agreement, to divide what is called the fertile crescent between Iraq and Syria and let Britain get access to the oil of the area and be able to exploit it in the future. Speaker 0: But British rule was initially rejected by the Iraqi people until Faisal was installed as king in July 1921. Britain hoped the limited power it devolved to him would serve to placate the frustrated demands for Arab independence. But sheriff Hussein expected more from the British. More from the British. Speaker 2: He never gave up the idea that the British had promised him independence, not only in Arabia, but in Syria and Iraq as well. And he wanted the British to fulfill their Speaker 0: Sheriff Hussein's dream of an Arab kingdom ruled by the Hashemites was only partially fulfilled. For although his other son, Abdullah, became King of Transjordan, their old rival, Ibn Saud, swept the Hashemites out of Hejaz when he conquered the Shemites out of Hejaz when he conquered the whole of the Arabian Peninsula. In Jerusalem, An administration was established by the British in the spring of 1920. There were no plans for devolving power in Palestine. Palestine was a land sacred to 3 religions. Jews were a small minority who had lived harmoniously with Christians and the much larger community of Muslims for 100 of years. But the Balfour declaration, promising Jews a homeland in had been incorporated into the British mandate at Versailles. Palestine was thus to be opened for new European Jewish immigration. With celebrations and parades in support of Zionist activities. It seemed as if the British were going to honor their pledges to the Jews and ignore Palestinian hopes of independence. Speaker 3: The Arabs Had a strong case, but very poor advocates. The Zionists had a case. It wasn't as strong as that of the local Arabs, but they had brilliant advocates. Zionism is one of the greatest public relations success stories of the 20th century, and Chaim Weizmann Exemplified these traditional Jewish skills of advocacy and, persuasion. Speaker 0: Some of these skills were clearly in evidence when Weizmann and various Zionist groups helped finance land purchases and the building of settlements for immigrant Jews. At the same time, Political and security organizations were created to support the emerging Jewish homeland. The Arab community in Palestine was incensed. Speaker 2: The Palestinians couldn't conceive their country being divided or given away to Another community, which had nothing to do with the Middle East in the 1st place and was almost wholly European at the time. So to them, it seemed absurd that 600 to 700,000 should give up their land, their homes, their villages, their towns, and hand them over to a minority, which was dispersed, throughout Palestine. And Palestine, after all, is named after its people, who are the Palestinians. Speaker 0: In 1925, Arthur Balfour toured the new Jewish settlements in Palestine. Although he was fated as a hero of the Zionist cause, the immigration of European Jews was to have unforeseen consequences for British rule in Palestine. Speaker 3: I believe that the Balfour Declaration was one of the most serious mistakes in British imperial history. It, committed Britain to, support of Jewish nationalism in Palestine after the war, and, it did not, produced any immediate benefits for Britain. Speaker 6: Without the Balfour Declaration, There could have been no genuine development of a Jewish national home, and the follow through In 1948, where you get the creation of a state of Israel, simply would not have happened. It it requires the umbrella of the British to be there, in effect, to support the emerging Jewish national home militarily at the bottom line. The very fact There are British troops, British policemen there to protect the Jewish communities is ultimately central to the situation. It could not have been done in any other way. Speaker 0: Throughout the 1930s and forties, the years of Nazi persecution in the Holocaust. Jewish immigration to Palestine increased rapidly. But what was seen by the Arabs As an alien incursion and the Jews as a fulfillment of historic rights led to polarization and violence. In response to terrorist acts by Arabs, Britain restricted the immigration. But the policy only stimulated Jewish terrorism. Against this background, Britain relinquished its mandate. And the state of Israel was born in 1948. When the first of several wars between the new state and its Arab neighbors began, thousands of Palestinian Arabs fled their homeland. Thus, the strategies employed by Britain to win the First World War Inadversely left a deep divide between Arab and Jew. Speaker 3: The most serious Consequences of British policy during the war was the encouragement of Arab nationalism and Jewish nationalism. And in the aftermath of the First World War, Britain was left With this legacy of double dealing and of betrayal, which was to haunt her for a long, long time. Speaker 1: Clearly, it played a role in dividing the Arab world into different states, in allowing the establishment of the state of Israel and in frustrating Arab desires. But if what happened in in Sykes Picot and everything else when the First World War is used as an excuse for the problems of the Middle East now, I think that would be a mistake. But, yes, the roots of what we see today Certainly arose from the double dealing of the 1st World War and from the frustrated expectations of that time.

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

They funded the Nazis through American Corporations after they moved them all to Delaware from NJ in the early 1900’s during the “Spanish flu epidemic”. They also funded/controlled Zionism, Nazism & the Bolshevik’s… (The Rothschilds & Crown merged through Titles of Nobility)

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

All of Prince Philip’s sisters married Nazis 🪃 Here’s the late Queen Elizabeth II with her uncle Edward — King Edward the VIII (also head of the Church of England) just doing what Fake British-German Nazi’s do 👀 1933 — So many Royal coincidences suddenly coming to light… ☀️ https://t.co/osuYR8O0UD

@ivan_8848 — Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

Posted - December 25, 2023 at 5:26 PM

Saved - December 26, 2023 at 10:15 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

The Maidan Riots in Ukraine led to an illegal coup against the elected President, starting a civil war. The US government's involvement includes orchestrating the coup, supporting Nazis and CIA snipers, and provoking war with Russia. The US-led NATO war machine and propaganda media are criticized, and the post questions support for the US government and its actions. The war in Ukraine is seen as provoked and inevitable, with Zelensky being called a puppet. NATO is criticized as a military alliance that feeds on war and is called to disband. The US government's role in the Maidan coup and its support for neo-Nazis in Ukraine are highlighted. The post argues that understanding the US government's role in Ukraine is crucial to understanding the current crisis. The war in Ukraine is blamed on US, British, and NATO expansion.

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

The Maidan Riots in Feb 2014 orchestrated by Nuland, Obama,CIA, USAID, NED and a whole host of other US tentacles led to the illegal Coup D'Etat against a legitimately elected President and started the Civil War. Obama called them "Peaceful protesters". https://t.co/lqamnvTiZY https://t.co/bq1oxSQyyo

Video Transcript AI Summary

The protesters in Ukraine are calling for a revolution to topple the elected government and sign an association agreement with the EU. They want a stable business environment and support from the free world. It would be a shame to waste years of preparation if the agreement is not signed soon. Some believe that Yats is the right person to lead the government due to his economic and governing experience. The brave Ukrainians are peacefully standing against tyranny and expect the government to avoid violence when dealing with them.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: How does this suddenly morph from a protest into a revolution as the protesters are calling, looking to topple an Speaker 1: elected Government to change the president, to sign an association agreement, but this is our agenda. We are waiting that president then return back to Brazil and sign that agreement. Good to see you. We're here from America. Would you like some red? Then Signing the association agreement with the EU would also put Ukraine on a path to strengthening the sort of stable and predictable business environment that investors require. An The free world is with America is with you. I am with you. It would be a huge shame to see 5 years' worth of work and preparation go to waste an If if the AA is not signed in the near future, so it is time to finish the job. We have been actively engaged in what's been happening in the then I don't think cleats should go into the government. I don't think it's necessary. I don't think it's a good idea. I think Yats is the guy who's got the economic experience, the governing experience. Obviously not gonna comment on private diplomatic conversations. These, brave Ukrainians took to the streets in order to stand peacefully against tyranny. And we expect, the Ukrainian government, to shoulder strength, to not resort to violence and dealing with, peaceful protesters.

@KimDotcom - Kim Dotcom

This is important. Pay attention. What the US Govt did to Ukraine is unforgivable: The 2014 coup with the help of Nazis and CIA snipers, endless propaganda and lies, breaches of the Minsk accords, murder of 15,000+ ethnic Russians in Donbas, provoking war with Russia via NATO expansion with plans to station nuclear capable missiles 400km from Moscow, arrogantly ignoring Russias warning to back off, acting surprised when Russia invaded Ukraine “unprovoked”, blowing up the NordStream pipelines in an act of international terrorism, unleashing thousands of sanctions against Russia to force “regime change” (unsuccessfully), bankrupting Ukraine with loans and by wrecking the Ukrainian economy, ripping off the US tax base and paying the Military Industrial Complex for sending old and ineffective arms stockpiles to Ukraine, causing millions of Ukrainians to flee to Europe, falsely promising Ukraine “unwavering support for as long as it takes”, preventing a peace agreement with Russia, causing 600,000+ Ukrainians to die in a US proxy war, losing 20% of Ukrainian territory and $10+ trillion of proven natural resources to Russia, controlling western mainstream media and lying to the world by falsely claiming that Ukraine is winning and that Russia is about to fold, using EU politicians as puppets who sold out and will never win re-election, de-industrialization of Europe and luring Gas dependent Industries with unfair subsidies to the US, costing EU taxpayers 120+ billion for funding a US proxy war and causing trillions in future economic losses for the EU, getting Germany to send tanks to kill Russians after the Soviets sacrificed 27 million people in WW2 to stop Adolf Hitler, getting Putin charged for war crimes by the western funded International Criminal Court and then backing an actual genocide by Israel against Palestinian civilians, blaming Ukraine for the failed counter-offensive instead of admitting that Pentagon war simulations are garbage, preventing diplomacy because peace and a neutral Ukraine would be a victory for Russia and destroying Biden’s re-election chances, laundering money via Ukraine to US and Ukrainian politicians, the list goes on and on. Don’t even get me started about the millions of people the US Govt killed by funding the creation of Covid-19 and unsafe vaccines. Are you supporting the United States Govt and the US Deep State which controls politicians in all parties, the judiciary and big tech? Are you supporting the Pentagon propaganda media, the US censorship machine and the 5 Eyes mass surveillance regime that constantly collects every bit of data about you? Are you supporting the US led NATO war machine, chaos by design, global deception and mass murder? Did you know that the US Govt has killed over 20 million people in 37 victim nations since WW2? That doesn’t include deaths by sanctions and Covid-19. Is your nation and are your politicians backing endless US wars, theft and crimes against humanity? What happened in Ukraine is your wake-up call. This may be your last chance to rise against the evildoers and their corrupt system. Soon @X and @elonmusk will be forced to comply with censorship or be destroyed and you will have to look for posts like this in the anonymous corners of the Internet. If you fail to act World War 3 is more likely than not and 99% of humanity would vanish. This isn’t fear-mongering. You need to understand why the US started the proxy war with Russia: If the US Govt can’t stop the growing multipolar order spearheaded by Russia and China or the de-dollarization in international trade the US will simply collapse because it will no longer be able to print money on the backs of other nations which use the US dollar as a reserve currency. Printing trillions of dollars was the only way for the US Govt to stay afloat, turning the markets into a Ponzi scheme and managing an unsustainable and rapidly increasing debt-burden. Those days are numbered.

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

https://t.co/kkxTrs1azP

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

The Ukraine - Russian War was planned well in advance. The war in Ukraine will stop when it is stopped by the one who organized it, financed and continues to finance it. This war is provoked and inevitable. Zelensky is a puppet. https://t.co/eWAfFBPTas https://t.co/4KAV1NUBfC

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

https://t.co/BpXXczYv1s

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

Brilliant!!! The best video @0rf ‼️👏👏👏 Watch Matt Orfalea Bitch Slap Those Who Said The Ukraine Invasion Was "Not About NATO" The biggest threat in the world is NATO. NATO exists to solve the problems created by NATO’s existence. NATO is a military alliance that feeds on war. To justify its existence, NATO constantly needs an external enemies and conflicts. NATO DISBAND!

Video Transcript AI Summary

President Putin sent a draft treaty to NATO, asking them to promise not to expand further. NATO did not agree, so Putin invaded Ukraine to prevent NATO from encroaching on his borders. However, many speakers emphasize that the conflict is not about NATO enlargement but rather about protecting democracy in Ukraine. They argue that Ukraine's restrictions on political parties, books, music, and elections are evidence of this. Some speakers compare Putin to Hitler, claiming he is trying to rebuild a Soviet empire and is a threat to global peace. Senator Lindsey Graham expresses concern about Putin's actions in Ukraine and other parts of the world.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: President Putin actually sent a a draft treaty that they wanted NATO to sign to promise no more NATO enlargement. That was what what he sent us. And that was that that was a precondition for not invade Ukraine. Of course, we didn't sign that. So he went to war to prevent NATO, more NATO across his borders. Speaker 1: Flashback. Speaker 0: This is fundamentally not about NATO Expansion Speaker 1: It was never about NATO enlargement. It's not about NATO. Speaker 2: It's not Speaker 3: about NATO expanding toward Russia. Speaker 1: This was never about NATO? Speaker 3: It's absolutely nothing to do with NATO expansionism. And it Speaker 1: has nothing to do with NATO. This is not about NATO. It's not about NATO. It's not really about NATO. Speaker 2: This is not about NATO. Speaker 1: Seriously, it's not about NATO. Speaker 2: This was never about NATO. Speaker 1: It was never about NATO. Let's be honest. Speaker 2: This doesn't have anything to do with NATO? Speaker 1: Nothing to do with NATO at all. Yeah. He's Claiming it's, like, security purposes, but we can see the clear reason. Speaker 2: But NATO is not the reason. This is not about NATO expansion. This is about the democratic expansion. Ukraine bans religious organizations. We are protecting democracy right now. Ukraine is banning political parties. Because it's a democracy. Ukraine restricts books and music. It's about democracy. Ukraine won't hold elections. Speaker 1: It's about democracy. And it's Speaker 2: not about NATO expansion. This war in Ukraine is not about NATO. Speaker 1: It's not about NATO. It's not about NATO. It Speaker 2: has nothing to do with NATO. Speaker 3: Nothing to do with NATO expansion. Speaker 1: It's not about NATO expansion. Speaker 2: Nothing to do with with NATO. It isn't really about NATO. It's not about NATO. It's not about NATO enlargement. In fact, it has nothing to do with NATO. It's not about NATO encroaches So it's not about NATO. NATO is just as a fictious imaginary adversary for for for mister Putin and for Russia. It was never about NATO. That's not what it's been about. It's been about Him trying to expand his sphere of influence. Hang on. I mean, the 2 are not mutually exclusive. Obviously, Russia has wished for a sphere of influence over Ukraine. But if the west had not challenged Russian interests so directly. I think that there there was a chance to avoid this war. Speaker 0: He wanted us to sign a promise never to enlarge NATO. We rejected that. Speaker 3: The reason why Putin invaded Ukraine is because of his evil Evil. Speaker 0: It's about that Putin wants to rebuild Soviet empire of evil like president Reagan told. Speaker 2: About Putin being sick. I don't know how you negotiate peace with a madman, but nobody negotiated with Hitler. People were comparing him to Hitler. To Hitler. Remember Hitler? He's Hitler. We're back when the Nazis invaded Poland. This is exactly the same what Hitler was doing to choose. This is the same. Speaker 1: Putin will not stop. Speaker 3: Putin is reminiscent of Hitler. Hitler. Speaker 2: This reminds me of Hitler. Hitler. Hitler. He's the new Hitler. Oh, Hitler. This is about a butcher trying to kill people everywhere in the world, Just not Ukraine. Syria, all over the place. I hear you. Senator Lindsey Graham, always great to talk to you. Thanks so much. Thank you. Alright. Straight ahead.

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

https://t.co/U8N74qxoaO

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

The US/NATO Orchestration of the 2014 Maidan Coup in Ukraine Victoria Nuland Had a Hand in Every US Intervention in the Past 30 Years Welcome to Nulandistan: A Multimedia Look at What the US and EU Have Unleashed on Ukraine CIA, USAID, NED and a whole host of other US tentacles https://t.co/mTYfikMGw5

Video Transcript AI Summary

We're discussing a phone call between Victoria Nuland, the top US diplomat for Europe, and the US ambassador to Ukraine, Jeff Pyatt. They talk about getting Sari to come in on Monday or Tuesday with the help of the UN and EU. The United States has supported Ukraine since its independence in 1991, investing over $5 billion to promote democracy, good governance, and civic participation. Americans support Ukrainian protesters who want closer ties to Europe. The United States has always been concerned about the alliance between Germany and Russia, as it poses a threat. The combination of German technology and capital with Russian resources and manpower has historically worried the US.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: We're talking about Victoria Nuland, the top US diplomat for Europe, assistant secretary. This is about a phone call she was having with the US ambassador to Ukraine, Jeff Pyatt. And I got to say, for a diplomatic reporter like me, it was a fascinating conversation. Speaker 1: He's now gotten both Seri and Ban Ki Moon To agree that Sari could come in Monday or Tuesday. Okay. So that would be great, I think, to help glue this thing and have the UN help glue it And, you know, the EU. Speaker 2: Since Ukraine's independence in 1991, the United States has supported Ukrainians as they Build democratic skills and institutions as they promote civic participation and good governance, all of which are preconditions for Ukraine to its European aspirations. We've invested over $5,000,000,000 to assist Ukraine in these and other goals that will ensure Pure and prosperous and democratic Ukraine. Speaker 3: Americans support their resistance. Protesters want closer ties to Europe, not Russia. So the primordial interest of the United States over which for century we have fought wars, the first, second cold war has been the Shipping Germany and Russia because United, they are the only force that could threaten us and to make Sure that that doesn't happen. For the United States, the primordial fear is Russian capital, Russian technology, I mean, German technology and German capital, Russian, natural resources, Russian manpower as the only combination that has for centuries scared the hell Speaker 0: States.

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

https://t.co/JOSnDRW7br

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

How Obama And Biden Installed Neo-Nazis In Ukraine Today’s war cannot be understood without first understanding the U.S. government’s role in Ukraine's Maidan Coup. If the American people knew the truth about how Obama and Biden helped Neo-Nazi factions overthrow the elected government of Ukraine, they might not be so eager to start World War III. Today’s crisis in Ukraine cannot be understood without first understanding the U.S. government’s role in the Ukrainian Maidan Coup.

Video Transcript AI Summary

Pro-EU protests in Kyiv continue for a second day, with around 1,000 demonstrators joined by opposition leader Vitali Klitschko. The protests are in response to the government's decision not to sign a major trade deal with the EU. Investigative journalist Robert Perry explains that some NGOs are funded by governments and serve their interests rather than the people they claim to help. In the 1980s, the CIA's activities were exposed, leading to the creation of the National Endowment for Democracy (NED) to carry out similar operations. NED and other US agencies supported political groups, trained activists, and influenced media to advance US foreign policy interests. Mustafa Nayan, founder of Dromadskaya TV, used social media to bring crowds to Maidan Square. Symbolism and catchy slogans were employed to unite protesters, and organizations like Huromadske TV received donations from the Dutch and US embassies and George Soros' NGO.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Pro EU protests on the streets of Kyiv enter their 2nd day. The crowd of around a 1000 protesters were joined by the leader of the opposition, the reigning world boxing champion, Vitali Klitschko. He called in the demonstrators to maintain pressure on the government after it decided not to sign a major trade deal with the EU. Speaker 1: You go back to Kyiv the next day after the meeting with Merkel and the protests Surrupt, am I right? Can you take me through that period? Speaker 2: Robert Perry is a longtime investigative journalist based Investigative journalist based in Washington DC, best known for his major disclosures about the Iran Contra scandal in the 19 eighties. He is the founder of Consortium News, where he has reported extensively on the crisis in Ukraine and the forces behind the unrest. Speaker 3: An NGO is a Nongovernmental organization. Now many NGOs are quite legitimate. They represent good causes. Maybe they help people in a country Feed or deal with water problems or deal with various kinds of social problems. But there are some NGOs That have become funded by government entities, and serve more the purpose of that government rather than trying to serve the people that they are sensibly working for. One thing we saw in the 19 eighties, at that point, the Central Intelligence Agency had been largely discredited Because of scandals that had been exposed in the 19 seventies. Speaker 4: For 15 years, the CIA has secretly financed overseas Seize activities of the National Students Association. But then there came to light a fantastic web of CIA penetrations. Speaker 3: So when the Reagan administration came in, there was this concept that instead of having the CIA, which traditionally would go into these different target countries funding their media, funding NGOs funding, different political operations. That was essentially farmed out to, a new organization called the National Endowment for Democracy which was created in 1983, and it would do pretty much what the agency used to do. It would go into one of these countries and it would support Various political groups, train activists, deal with journalists, business groups, and try to advance US foreign policy interests, sometimes against the interests of the of the host government, the target government. And beyond that, they Received financial and other logistical help from the National Endowment for Democracy and other US agencies that helped them Training activists, working with journalists to get, get their side presented more favorably. They work on things like how do you get traction? How do you get things To go viral, how do you then use that to generate support for your cause? Speaker 2: And support was generated. Speaker 1: Mustafa Nayan. Speaker 2: Mustafa Nayan, a founder of one of Ukraine's new media outlets. Dromadskaya TV knew very well how to make something go viral. It was his notorious Facebook a post on November 21, 2013 that brought the 1st crowds to Maidan. Don't read the newspaper, you are uninformed. If you read the newspaper, you are misinformed. To deliver your message efficiently enough in the modern world with so many different technologies and means of communications, you must embrace them all. As the disturbing events of Euromaidan started on November 21, 2013, 3 new TV channels went on the air and suddenly became stunningly Popular in Ukraine. SpillNote TV, November 21st. November 22nd and Espresso TV, November 24th, directly from opposition protest. These channels went viral, supporting the protests and encouraging more and more people to come to Maidan. As veiled and masked as the color revolutions can be, an attentive The viewer can see subtle patterns and similarities revealing their true nature. To make crowds act as one obedient group. They have to be united at the unconscious level. The masterminds of color revolutions know this well and have perfected the art. Symbolism is one of the most powerful tools to achieve this end. Revolutionary political organizations with surprisingly similar names and even more similar logos have appeared time and again, almost as omens marking the countries that would be hit by the colored plague next. They're often described as being aware and active When they're actually trained and radical, they are the ones who take the first shot, literal and metaphorical, to transform the peaceful protests Into full blown coup d'etats. Their fingerprints can be found everywhere on the map of the color revolutions. Using all the experience of past generations, simple but effective tools like catchy sing Alarms and chanting are employed. Well known for exciting the crowd and creating a group identity, they depersonalize individuals and make them easier to manipulate. Incidentally, one such organization, Huromadske TV, received generous donations from the Dutch and US embassies As well as from the Renaissance Foundation, an NGO founded by George Soros. Speaker 5: I set up a foundation in Ukraine Before Ukraine became independent of, Russia, and the foundation has been, functioning ever since, And we play that an important part in events now.

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

https://t.co/POe2zrl4dK

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

'Putin didn't want the war' John Mearsheimer on Ukraine War in Ukraine is the Fault of US, British and NATO Expansion. We Believed That We Could Win The War.

Video Transcript AI Summary

Putin initially tried to prevent the war and sought a diplomatic solution. He negotiated with Ukraine, focusing on Crimea. However, his main concern was NATO expansion into Ukraine. If Ukraine had remained neutral, the war might have been avoided. But the US and UK intervened, pressuring Ukraine to abandon negotiations. In 2022, it seemed possible for Ukraine and the West to win, but 2023 has been disastrous for Ukraine, and now it appears Russia will emerge victorious.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Putin did not want this war. He went to great lengths before February 24, 2022, when the war started to, head it off at the past. He wanted to come up with a diplomatic solution. And then shortly after the war broke out in February, he was negotiating with the Ukrainians to work out a deal. And at that point in time, he was not talking about incorporating any Ukrainian territory, save for Crimea, which had already been annexed into Russia. And all he really cared about, it's quite clear from all the reports of the people who were involved in the discussions, was NATO expansion into Ukraine. He wanted a neutral Ukraine, and if he had gotten a neutral Ukraine, this is right after the war started, I believe there's a good chance the war could have been shut down, but it was the Americans and the British who moved in and basically told Zelensky that he had to walk away from the negotiations because we believed that we could win the war, we meaning Ukraine plus the west. And in 2022, it actually looked like that might be the case. But now it's quite clear to 2023 has been a disastrous year for the Ukrainians. And if anything, the Russians will win the war.

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

https://t.co/ebB3iZWqNY

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

How US Started the War in Ukraine?! https://t.co/kNWCcOVDLO

Video Transcript AI Summary

In 2014, three foreign ministers from Poland, Germany, and France arrived in Ukraine to sign an agreement between the government and the opposition. However, just two days later, a coup d'etat took place, orchestrated by our American allies. The European guarantors of the agreement claimed ignorance. This event, along with the desire to bring Ukraine into NATO, has led to the ongoing tragedy in the Donbas region.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: So in 2014, 3 foreign ministers arrived from Europe, from Poland, Germany, and France. They signed as guarantors of the agreement between the government of the time, president Yanukovych, and the opposition. They agreed that everything would be resolved peacefully. 2 days later, they carried out a coup d'etat. Why? Why did they not decide to win through elections? They did it to make a point to create conflict. That's why. And you may ask who did this? Our American cronies. And the Europeans, who signed as guarantors of the agreement between the government and the opposition, pretended they knew nothing at all. And now you can ask anyone in Europe, does anyone remember anything about it? No. But we have not forgotten, and we won't forget this, plus the unbridled desire to crawl up to our borders, taking Ukraine into NATO. All this led to this tragedy, plus the bloody events in the Donbas region that lasted 8 years. All of this led to the tragedy we are now experiencing.

@Vltra_MK — Michael Rae Khoury

Posted - January 3, 2024 at 9:00 PM

Saved - January 3, 2024 at 11:41 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

The posts discuss various topics related to power and control. They mention the influence of the royal bloodline in Europe, particularly House Wettin, and how they still rule key European countries. The CIA is portrayed as a ruthless paramilitary mafia that manipulates governments and presidents for their own agenda. The role of Britain in starting the Arab-Israeli conflict and the City of London's involvement in the secret world of finance are also highlighted.

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

This is your Royal Death Racket enemy… 💯 (SEE THREADS BELOW👇🏼) https://t.co/9z0JyOr9i6

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

Royals still rule us… how? 👇🏼

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

The Cabal - Royals still rule us... >The Bloodline< House Wettin, aka House Coburg and Saxe Gotha is a supremely powerful Germanic medieval bloodline dating back to 900AD. All the monarchs of Europe are either directly descended or directly related to this bloodline. This powerful cabal of royals has (throughout history) ruled the thrones of many European countries, including Portugal, Bulgaria, Poland, Germany, Russia, Liechtenstein. And they still rule the thrones of key European countries such as the United Kingdom, Belgium (HQ of EU) and the Netherlands to this day. They (via their intelligence agencies) secretly control everything in the western world. Many people view elite European and American oligarchs as the "cabal," but the truth is that Royals are the top of the food chain - legally more powerful than all oligarchs, politicians, and generals combined. They even control the United States via their corrupt deal with the CIA and FBI - blackmailing, bribing, or assassinating anyone who dares to get in their way (including Presidents).

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

Black Ops 101 — the Dark Truth about the CIA

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

< Black Ops 101 > The Dark Truth About the CIA ☠️ FULL THREAD 🧵 Many people think that the CIA is a patriotic organization that protects Americans from danger, and informs the President about what's happening in the world so he can make good decisions. But that couldn't be further from the truth. The truth is that the CIA is a vicious paramilitary mafia, that rigs elections, overthrows governments, kills people, and manipulates our presidents into doing their bidding. They are the world's foremost experts in lying, cheating, and stealing from other countries. They sow chaos, degeneracy, corruption, and violence everywhere they go. 🥷🏽Uses Terrorists & Criminals as Assassins 💰Blackmails & Bribes Politicians Worldwide 💵Funded By Slavery & Drug-Dealing 👑Uses Authority of the British Crown How It Started 🔥 The CIA was created by British Intelligence during WW2, when MI6 came over and taught Americans the ruthless tactics they had been developing for centuries.

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

How Britain Started the Arab-Israeli Conflict

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

"How Britain Started the Arab-Israeli Conflict" 👀 This is a must-watch with all that's happening... 💯 (suggested at 1.5x speed)

Video Transcript AI Summary

The video discusses the origins of the Arab-Israeli conflict, tracing it back to British involvement in the Middle East during World War I. The British made conflicting promises to both the Arabs and the Jews, leading to a legacy of bloodshed and division in the region. The Sykes-Picot Agreement and the Balfour Declaration were key factors in shaping the future of the Middle East. The video highlights the impact of these decisions on the establishment of Israel and the subsequent displacement of Palestinian Arabs. Overall, the video emphasizes the role of British double dealing and the consequences it had on the region.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: The bitter struggle between Arab and Jew for control of the Holy Land has caused untold suffering in the Middle East for generations. It is often claimed that the crisis originated with Jewish immigration to Palestine and the foundation of the state Israel. Yet the roots of the conflict are to be found much earlier In British double dealing during the First World War, this is a story of intrigue among rival empires, of misguided strategies and of how conflicting promises to Arab and Jew created a legacy of bloodshed which has determined the fate of the Middle East. Speaker 1: During the First World War, the British, the French, and the Russians had these secret plans to carve up the Ottoman Empire, because they believed that would balance out their imperial ambitions, But tough luck for the Turks, the Arabs, and anyone else who got in the way. Speaker 2: Certainly, all the seeds were planted then In the sense that it was the British who promised the Arabs independence on the one hand And, a Jewish homeland on the other, and you could not simply reconcile one with the other. Speaker 3: The British scattered promises to anyone who might be of some use To them without thinking about the consequences. So British duplicity, British double dealing went a long way to perpetuate the conflict in Palestine. Speaker 4: At the end of the day, when you're fighting a war, you are very liberal in what you're offering in terms of a post war settlement. When you get down to the conference table when the war has ended and you have to start honoring your agreements, you then have to decide what's in your interest or not, and it puts all the Middle East as a western flag for their power in India and their power in Asia in general. Speaker 0: The story of Britain's involvement in the Middle East and the ensuing struggle between Arab and Jew begins with her colonial past. At the beginning of 20th century, King Edward the 7th ruled over a vast empire with interests in every part of the world. Speaker 4: India became increasingly important because it was the 2nd pillar of British power in the world. Moving the Indian Army about was extremely important in extending British interests and British influence across the globe. And the Suez Canal was, of course, the quick way To do that, it's very important for the British shared geopolitical position to ensure the Suez Canal remains safe and secure. Speaker 0: With this aim in mind, Britain had become the only European power to establish a major foothold in the Middle East, in the principalities around the Persian Gulf, in Aden, and in Egypt. Britain had annexed Egypt from Turkey's Ottoman Empire in 18 82. And by the time it was made a protectorate in 1914, Cairo had become the center of British power in the Middle East. The presence of imperial troops in the region was of vital strategic importance. For the Ottoman Empire under Sultan Mohammed But the 5th was an alliance with Britain's much feared rival, Germany. Together with the Austro Hungarian Empire, these countries made up the Central Powers and pitted against them were the 3 allies, Britain, France and Russia. From the Ottoman capital, Constantinople in Turkey. The sultan ruled over the last of the great Islamic empires. It had been an almost terminal decline for decades. Yet the fate of the Ottoman Empire was to be sealed by the outbreak of the First World War in August 1914. In Europe, Germany's rapid advance was halted by Britain and France along the Western Front. In the east, Russia's war against Germany and Austria Hungary also reached deadlock. The powerful weapons of the industrial age were killing thousands of men in the trenches of every army. Speaker 5: All of the leading powers expected the war to be over within a matter of months. So in that sense, all of them are surprised at the end of 1914, When not merely is the war going on, but it shows every sign of being likely to go on for a very long time. At that point, they began to think about new ways of winning the war. Speaker 0: Prime minister, Asquith, felt that with the stalemate in Europe, it was essential to widen the conflict. Together with foreign secretary Lord Grey, Minister for War, Lord Kitchener, and the 1st Lord of the Admiralty, Winston Churchill, they masterminded a complex strategy to undermine the Central Powers. Speaker 4: This was a global war, and the British saw the Middle East very much in a global context. The traditional British preference for sideshows, as people, unfavorably call it, the indirect strategy, The way of, attacking the soft underbelly, as Churchill called it, of the enemy. Speaker 0: And the soft underbelly was seen to be Turkey. Britain's secret plan involved, on the one hand, a military diversion, and on the other, a devious use of diplomacy through bribery, Subversion and double dealing, all these devices focused on the enemy's weakest link, Turkey's Ottoman Empire. Speaker 1: Diplomacy in general has always had a secret dimension to it. Whether where but where discretion ends and conspiracy begins is an open question. But during the period up to and during the First World War, there was a particularly intense set of negotiations and discussions between the major imperial powers, between the French, the Russians, and the British, in particular, cutting in the Italians as well about what would they do When the war was over and when the Ottoman Empire broke up. Speaker 0: The British government hoped that by striking a deal over the spoils of war, It would strengthen the alliance against the Central Powers. Amongst the allies, Russia had long sought access to the Mediterranean. In a secret treaty of March 1915, Britain and France offered What was to the czar a prize of vital geopolitical importance, Constantinople. Speaker 6: It is that key outlet into the wider world and into the Mediterranean. And it is the one thing, of course, the British and the French have been Attempting to prevent the Russians from achieving. So this is a complete. This is this is the British, the French, and the Russians Coming to an agreement over something which was, up to this point, almost inconceivable. Speaker 0: Italy's King Vittoria Emmanuel is another target for bribery. Britain, France, and Russia tried to tempt Italy, a pro German state, to join the Allies. In April 1915, a secret treaty offered Italy a substantial bit of Ottoman real estate in Anatolia. Speaker 6: Again, it's another power coming into the equation and being offered territorial advancement which in normal circumstances would have been quite inconceivable. Speaker 0: The bribe worked. Italy joined the Allies and declared war on the Central Powers in August 1915. But Britain's strategy to undermine the enemy via the Ottoman Empire also required subversion. By using domestic opposition to weaken, maybe even destroy it, Britain exploited a new movement sweeping through the empire. Nationalism. Speaker 1: Nationalism in the sense of believing that there are peoples with a clear cultural identity and that these people should live independent. That idea spread to the Middle East as to other parts of the world in the latter part of 19th century. So you had the beginnings in the Ottoman Empire of a Turkish nationalism. Speaker 0: This came to a head when the Young Turks power in a coup in 1908 and started to impose their language and culture on the Arabs of the empire. But this only reawakened an interest amongst Arabs in their own heritage. A 1000 years before, Arabs had brought the technology and literature of the East to the West. And their religion, Islam, had encompassed much of Asia, North Africa and Southwestern Europe. The idea of recovering that historic grandeur had remained in the consciousness of Arab intellectuals. By the start of the First World War, the antagonism between Arab and Turk had increased. Speaker 1: The very fact that the Turks were saying we want to have a unified empire meant the Arabs said, wait a minute. We're not part of this. So all of this Literary and nationalistic revival then took a much more political form, and therefore, you got the emergence of Arab nationalism. Speaker 2: They had arrived at the conclusion that remaining in the Ottoman Empire was becoming hopeless, this, that they couldn't actually share power with the Turks, and they began thinking of having their own Speaker 0: By the summer of 1915, British intelligence confirmed that the Arab nationalist movement was the breakthrough the government was looking for. Britain and her French ally Dispatched officers to send out Arab leaders. Speaker 2: Both the French and the British started, You could say seducing various local Arab leaders that if you side with us, we'll give you your independence, so why don't you leave the Ottomans? And various people were tempted as a result. If they they thought they could actually gain independence, why not Side with the Europeans against the Ottomans. Speaker 0: The idea was to tempt the Arabs into a revolt against their Ottoman overlords And create a diversion which would tie down the central powers in the Middle East. Ironically, the impetus for such a diversion had come not from London but from the Arab world. In the Hejaz in Western Arabia, sheriff Hussein, its ruler, was set on extending his political and geographical domain. He believed he might be able to do it with the help of the British. In turn, the British were impressed by Sharif Hussein's family credentials as custodians of the holy places of Islam. Speaker 1: They call themselves Hashemites. They call the family Hashemites because that's the family or the tribe of the prophet Muhammad. They were the Bani Hashim, the sons of Hashim. So he was Sharif Hussein was the leader of the Hashemites. He was the person responsible for Mecca and Medina. And although he worked with the Ottomans Before the First World War, once the First World War happened, he saw this was his chance. Speaker 0: A chance too for the British who saw support sheriff Hussein, as a way to threaten the sultan's hold on the caliphate, the political leadership of the Islamic world. Speaker 2: The British, because they were Fighting the Ottomans, and the Ottomans were claiming to be the real representatives of Islam. They wanted a counterforce, And the counterforce was represented by Sharif Hussein being a descendant of the prophet. But Sharif Hussein was speaking of liberating Arab lands, Building a new national state. He wanted to be king of the Arabs, not simply of Arabians. Speaker 0: In July 1915, Sharif Hussein smuggled a message to the British High Commissioner in Cairo, sir Henry McMahon, Offering to raise a substantial Arab force against the Ottomans in return for British support for Arab independence. In the ensuing secret correspondence between the 2 men, Sharif Hussein was given to understand that he could expect British support in achieving some of his ambitions in the event of an Ottoman defeat. This letter of October 26, 1915 Outline the main points of the arrangement. Speaker 6: The actual document itself is absolutely Riven with ambiguity. There's no doubt about that. The question is whether Hussein recognizes that. My sense of Saying is that he does recognize it. In other words, there is no wool being poured over his eyes because he's perfectly aware that if he's going to create A modern Arab empire, he's going to need some logistical economic Development and that can only come from the outside world. Speaker 0: Taking Britain's assurances of support at face value, Hussein, together with his sons Faisal and Abdullah, Amassed a sizable force. The new army was commanded by the young and charismatic Faisal, who had captured the imagination of the Arab masses in the quest for Arab independence. Yet even as Hussein and Fizal mobilized their troops, the British were preparing to sell them short. Back in London in the spring of 1916, Britain was negotiating with France about the future shape of the Middle East. Behind closed doors, sir Mark Sykes of the British foreign office had been meeting his French opposite number, Francois Georges Picot. Britain knew it was vital to offer the French a stake in the spoils of the Ottoman Empire should they win the war. Speaker 7: There was an awareness on the British side that they had made such huge sacrifices that one couldn't just ignore, the French ambitions, and the French were determined to have their historical peace of the Levant. Speaker 0: Pouring over a map of the Levant, Sykes and Pico personally drew in the areas they wished to see under their control. Their secret deal amounted to the virtual carve up of the Middle East. In area A for the French and area B for the British, the imperialists intended to exercise power indirectly. They would appoint advisers and take charge of the finances in their respective spheres of influence. Then there was the area colored blue which was to be directly controlled by France. This included what was then known as Greater Syria where the French traditionally had commercial and religious interests. As for the area colored pink known as Iraq With its strategic ports, railways and oil, this was to be under British rule. The area, colored yellow, represented Palestine and was envisaged as an international zone except for Haifa. Speaker 2: What the British wanted was the oil of Iraq, And they concentrated on getting Iraq and getting away bit from Iraq to the Mediterranean in order to transport this oil. So they got Haifa on the Palestinian coast, and they got most of Iraq. Speaker 7: The Sykes PICA agreement was a pretty shameful document, and I wouldn't attempt to defend it. But it was drawn up by people who were sort of Operating under the old, kind of balance of power considerations in an imperial, frame of mind. Speaker 0: Unaware of these secret dealings behind their backs, Hussein and Faisal proclaimed independence. And in June 1916 attacked the Turkish troops. The Arab revolt against the Ottomans had begun. The Turkish garrison at Mecca was soon overrun and the seaport at Jidda seized. By 1917, Hussein and Faisal's forces had pushed north and engage the Ottoman Turks along the Hejaz railway. The British saw the Arab revolt as part of its strategy for creating a military diversion against the Central Powers. In a pincer movement, Britain had launched a campaign from the southwest to ensure control of the Suez Canal and the Levant. And from the southeast, it was fighting to secure the oil wells of Iraq. All this to attack the Central Powers at their weakest point, the Ottoman Empire. Speaker 2: The Arabs hitched their fortunes to the British. They consider themselves to be fighting with the allies, but at the same time, they were not merged into the British Army that they continue to act as an independent army called the Northern Army. Speaker 0: While the Arab army advanced northwards, Britain's general Allenby had crossed the Suez Canal. And by the spring of 1917, his forces had reached the frontier of Palestine. The war in Europe, however, was still not going well for Britain. The attempted push through the German lines at the Somme had produced little territorial gain. And the cost in lives was colossal. In London, there had been a change of leadership. The new prime minister, Lloyd George, felt that the Allied war effort needed a fresh impetus. Although America had so far been neutral in the Lloyd George was convinced that could be changed. He believed there was 1 powerful group which might influence the American government. Speaker 3: Lloyd George thought that the American decision, whether to join or not, would defend critically on public opinion, and the Jewish support could tilt the scales in one direction or the other. Speaker 5: You've got to remember that the British foreign office greatly overestimate the political power of international Jewry, particularly The wealthy, financial, and commercial, Jewish elites. Speaker 6: What is extraordinary about this situation is that Here you have particularly the British seeing the Jewish world as one collective monolithic entity. And in that sense, they start looking at the role of the Jews in the war as being something which might be important and from the point of view of the allies, something else quite remarkable. This monolithic collective entity is pro German. Speaker 0: Many Jews in the upper echelons of German society did indeed have close connections to the Kaiser's foreign office. A new Jewish nationalist movement, Zionism, had also been able to establish its headquarters in Berlin. Zionism had originated in the 18 eighties after Theodore Herzl published a book espousing the virtues of a Jewish state. This caused a sensation amongst Jewish intellectuals in Germany, Austria, and Russia who shared Herzl's outrage at the escalation of anti Jewish Speaker 3: The end of 19th century saw the rise of anti Semitism all over Europe, in Austria, In Germany, in France, but particularly in Eastern Europe, in Poland, and in Russia. And the pogrom against the Jews in Russia gave rise to the establishment of The lovers of Zion societies in a number of Russian cities who started to promote and to finance and to sponsor colonization, immigration to Palestine. Herzl came to the conclusion that the Jews were not safe anywhere in Europe, And the only solution was for the Jews to have a state of their own over which they could exercise sovereignty and where they would not be A minority. Speaker 0: What had also given Zionism its appeal was the way in which it fitted in to historic Jewish aspirations. Scattered throughout the world since the destruction of the Jerusalem temple in the 1st century AD, many Jews had cherished the idea of returning one day to what their scriptures had told them was the Promised Land. In fact, there had already been a small community of indigenous Jews in Palestine. But even when some European Jews established settlements throughout the late 19th century, the whole Jewish community, by 1914, Constituted barely 8% of the population. The Zionist leader in Britain, Chaim Weizmann, had been lobbying the government For a guarantee that in the event of an Ottoman defeat, it would support Jewish emigration to Palestine. By early 1917, Lloyd George's view of Jews as globally influential convinced him that Zionism was another nationalist movement which should be co opted to the Allied cause. In March, Mark Sykes began negotiations with Weizmann. Speaker 6: But actually the Jews do ultimately look to each other and look to their own interest. And if that interest As they are being told by Weitzman is, what we really want is Palestine. They're prepared to believe it. They're prepared to go along with it. Speaker 0: As negotiations with Weizmann continued over the following months, The war deteriorated rapidly for the Allies. The German submarine campaign was seriously weakening Britain's merchant fleet. And although America had entered the war on the Allied side, President Woodrow Wilson was not yet willing to supply a significant number of troops. Britain's latest attempt to keep up the pressure on the Western Front soon became came bogged down in the muddy trenches of Passchendaele. As thousands of young men's lives were wasted in another a fruitless campaign, morale amongst the soldiers plummeted. But the most serious threat to the Allied war machine came from the east. Russia was on the verge of collapse. After massive defeats at the hands of the Germans, The war weary country was disintegrating with food shortages, strikes, and demonstrations. When the czar was deposed in a revolution, Britain and France became greatly alarmed. Speaker 5: The point is that once Russia and its war effort begins to collapse, essentially, the Germans have won the First World War Unless they bring the Americans in, there's no way that the British and the French on their own are ever going to defeat Germany. Speaker 0: In October, the British government received an intelligence report suggesting that Jews were a significant influence in the leadership of the Bolshevik Party, The new revolutionary movement emerging as the dominant force in Russia. Lloyd George feared that these communists would take Russia out of the war. With the Americans still refusing to Using to commit sufficient forces, he knew it was time to act. He instructed his foreign secretary, Arthur Balfour, To issue a pledge to capture the hearts and minds of the Jewish people. Speaker 8: His majesty's government view with favor The establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people. And we'll use their best endeavors to facilitate the achievements of this object. Speaker 0: The Balfour Declaration was issued on November 2, 1917 Just as British forces were occupying Palestine. Speaker 3: I would say that the Balfour Declaration has to be understood Not as an idealistic gesture, but it has to be understood within the framework of British Imperial policy. And Lloyd George was the main instigator of That, declaration because he believed that it would serve Britain's interests. Speaker 0: But this was also the first time that any major European power had given official backing for the Zionist goal of making Palestine into a Jewish homeland. Yet sheriff Hussein had understood that Palestine had been promised as part of his deal for Arab independence. Anticipating Arab outrage at the prospect of a Jewish homeland in a largely Arab province, the Balfour Declaration had also stated that Speaker 8: Nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non Jewish communities in Palestine. Speaker 0: The declaration, nonetheless, appeared to indicate British support for Jewish emigration. Speaker 2: There were only a mere 80,000 Out of some, like, 700,000 people in Palestine who were Jews, the In, indigenous inhabitants of Palestine were referred to as non Jewish inhabitants, And that that Palestine was being identified even at that stage as a Jewish land, and all the others had no defined identity. They were simply non Jewish. Speaker 3: The Balfour Declaration was what it says, a declaration. It wasn't a treaty. It wasn't a signed agreement. It was a declaration in support of the establishment of a national home for the Jewish people in Palestine. Speaker 0: In fact, the only treaty Britain had signed in regard to Palestine was with the French, the secret Sykes Picot Agreement. On November 7th, within a few days of the Balfour Declaration, the Bolsheviks took power in Russia. Lloyd George hoped that it would have a desired effect of appeasing the Jews in the communist leadership. Speaker 6: What is it that they supposedly So want as Jews, Palestine. Now the whole argument is is totally logical. It's a nonsense argument because these particular people if one were to think of people like Trotsky or Zinovie or Yaffe, Some of the key Jewish leaders in the Russian Revolution, the the November Revolution, these these people, of course, are internationalists. Speaker 3: There were 15 to 20 Jews in the higher echelons of the Bolshevik party. Most of them were anti Zionist. And after they came to power, they, soon after they came to power, they issued a declaration to say that Zionism is a capitalist ploy, a capitalist idea. Speaker 0: The wildly inaccurate intelligence report on which Lloyd George based his strategy was to have major implications for Britain. Within weeks, Russia's new leaders did exactly the opposite of what he had expected. Not only did they pull out of the war, They opened up the archives of the czar's foreign office and published the secret treaties. The very treaties Britain had engineered with her allies to carve up Ottoman Empire, and to which Russia had been privy. Speaker 5: That, of course, is a very great embarrassment to the Western Allies because the Allies have been doing all sorts of deals behind the scenes in which They have handed out to each other large sections of the world, meanwhile, openly preaching That they are fighting the war in defense of democracy and, of course, also telling among others, the Arabs, That they are supporters of self determination for the peoples of the Ottoman Empire. Speaker 1: Publication secret treaties by the Bolsheviks It certainly creates an enormous suspicion in the Arab world, and this meant that the Sharif Hussein and the others said, wait a minute. What's going on? What a, Why are you not giving us independence? And secondly, why are you dividing us up into zone a and zone b? And at that point, of course, the Arabs realized that not only with the the British Their own particular interests, for example, in the ports of Palestine or in Iraq, but that they had promised other things to the French. Speaker 0: Amid Arab confusion and suspicion, general Allenby entered Jerusalem on foot together with Sykes, Pico, and a number of other allied notables. His British led forces had captured the holy city in December 1917. The leaders of the Arab Revolt, however, were nowhere to be seen. Fearing that Hussein and Faisal might lose heart, the British government forwarded a message to them, reiterating British commitment to Arab independence. Speaker 8: The Adam race will be given full opportunity of once again forming a nation of the world. This can only be achieved by the Adams themselves uniting, And Great Britain and her allies will pursue a policy with this ultimate unity in you. Speaker 0: Hussein stayed loyal to the Allied cause, still prepared to accept Britain's word on Arab independence, Although he spoke of settling accounts after the war. From Alander's point of view, he continued to rely on Arab support in the war against the Ottomans. But now that Jerusalem had been occupied by the British, had been occupied by the British. 1 party seized the initiative. In April 1918, Chaim Weizmann and the International Zionist Commission Traveled to Palestine to lay the foundation for a Hebrew university. Their hope was that it would become the intellectual hub of Zionism. Weizmann's visit, however, caused widespread alarm and indignation among the Arab population. And when he and the chief rabbi of Jerusalem met General Allenby, it looked as if Britain was preparing to honor the Balfour Declaration. 6 months later, Allenby's forces entered Damascus With their ally, Faisal's northern army, they had pushed the Ottoman troops north through Palestine into Syria. Speaker 2: The Arab revolt did contribute To the victory of the allies, first of all, it protected British flank in Palestine. Second, it kept a number of Turkish and German troops preoccupied. And third, the the British could have Never legitimized what they were doing unless they had the blessing of a particular Arab force. Speaker 0: On the 3rd October, the people of Damascus Flocked to Faisal's victory parade. If he was to seize power, he knew it was of great importance to make his presence felt And to be seen by the Arab people as their liberator. Later the same day, however, Faisal met with General Allenby at the Victoria Hotel in Damascus. Allenby warned him that his rule in Syria would be limited. Speaker 2: The British, by that time, knew that they were going to hand over Syria to the French. So they couldn't actually accept Faisal as a legitimate ruler. All they could do is to pay him his salary and the expenses of his army and his administration. Speaker 0: Undaunted by Allenby's warnings, Faisal assumed the title of governor of Damascus. With the support of his father, Sharif Hussein, he set about creating a power base for their goal of an independent Arab state. Pendant Arab state. On 31st October, the Ottomans were finally defeated. And at 11 o'clock on the 11th November 1918, The guns fell silent in Europe as the war with the Central Powers came to an end. The Peace Conference at Versailles began in January 1919. Representatives of the victorious allies, such as the French prime minister, Thomasin, and the American president, Woodrow Wilson, gathered to sort out what was to be done with the former territories of the defeated empires. Now the liberal use of promises by the British government had to be prioritized. Speaker 4: They did indeed make pledges to the Arabs, but they also made pledges to the Jews. They also made pledges to the French and the Russians and everybody else. And these people saw the world As an imperial world, not only did they want to carve out the Middle East, they wanted to carve up Russia. They thought this was the last great moment in which the imperial would be able to sit down and grab what was going, particularly since there was no one to stop them. Speaker 0: But Britain and her old ally, France, were up against the American president Woodrow Wilson's vision of a new world order, which promoted national self determination. Speaker 2: Once Independence had seemed to be a possibility that this principle of self determination, supported by the Americans, was going to be offered to all those who were to be liberated from former empires like the Habsburgs and the Ottomans. What the Palestinians wanted was an independent state. Speaker 0: In fact, Faisal had come from Damascus to plead the Arab cause. But the future of Palestine and the Middle East formed part of Britain's pledge to France in the Sykes Picoca Carver. In the event, Woodrow Wilson's principles about self determination were forgotten when it came to the people of the Middle East. Britain and France were free to go ahead with their agreement. But what of the promises Britain had made to the Jews regarding Palestine. Foreign Secretary Arthur Balfour, in a confidential memo during the Versailles Tsai peace talks with America, France, and Italy wrote. Speaker 8: The 4 great powers are committed to Zionism, and Zionism, be it right or wrong, good or bad is rooted in age long traditions. In present needs, in future hopes, a far profounder import than the desires and and prejudices of the 700,000 Arabs who now inhabit that ancient land. Speaker 0: That might sound like a warm endorsement of Zionism. Yet further in the post war memorandum, Balfour hints at a much more cynical agenda. Speaker 8: So far as Palestine is concerned, the powers have made no declaration of policy which at least in letter, they have not always intended to violate. Speaker 0: The Versailles peace conference was concluded on June 28, 1919 with the creation of the League of Nations. The 1st global institution for peace and security. Its covenant provided that the Arab and other territories ceded by the defeated Ottoman Empire should be administered by mandates which meant in effect that Britain and France were given the authority to impose their rule over the Arab territories. On November 21, 1919, Francois Georges Picot, the co architect of the Sykes Picot agreement, And the French general Goro arrived in Beirut. And so began the imposition of the French mandate for Syria and The British forces who had occupied the region since ousting the Ottoman Turks during the last months of the war were handing over power to The French, thus fulfilling their wartime pledge. Consolidating his position. When he was proclaimed king by the Syrian National Congress, the French were incensed and general Guro sent in his troops. By August 7, 1920, Faisal had been deposed and had to Faisal of a single independent state were now a distant memory for the Europeans. Speaker 1: The whole issue of spheres of influence meant that What appeared what was at first appeared to be a willingness to accept a single Arab state was in fact seriously diluted. And then on top of that, of course, the very fact of there being at French area and a British area meant that in effect, this was the seed of partition. So you had both Independence was denied, but also the unity of this area was denied. Speaker 0: The boundaries and governments of the Middle Eastern states that emerged bore the unmistakable the French half of the previously Ottoman province of Greater Syria became the mandate for Lebanon and Syria. The other half became the British mandate for Transjordan and Palestine. In the east, the Ottoman area of Mesopotamia, which included the oil fields of Mersour, was given to Britain as the mandate for Iraq. Speaker 2: So this was basically The importance of the Sykes Picot agreement to divide what is called the fertile crescent between Iraq and Syria And let Britain get access to the oil of the area and be able to exploit it in the Speaker 0: But British rule was initially rejected by the Iraqi people until Faisal was installed as king in July 1921. Britain hoped the limited power it devolved to him would serve to placate the frustrated demands for Arab independence. But sheriff Hussein expected more from the British. More from the British. Speaker 2: He never gave up the idea that the British had promised him independence, not only in Arabia, but in Syria and Iraq as well. And he wanted the British to fulfill their Promises. Speaker 0: Sheriff Hussein's dream of an Arab kingdom ruled by the Hashemites was only partially fulfilled. For although his other son, Abdullah, became King of Transjordan, their old rival, Ibn Saud, swept the Hashemites out of Hejaz when he conquered the whole of the Arabian Peninsula. In Jerusalem, An administration was established by the British in the spring of 1920. There were no plans for devolving power in Palestine. Palestine was a land sacred to 3 religions. Jews were a small minority who had lived harmoniously with Christians and the much larger community of Muslims for 100 of years. But the Balfour declaration, promising Jews a homeland in had been incorporated into the British mandate at Versailles. Palestine was thus to be opened for new European Jewish immigration. With celebrations and parades in support of Zionist activities. It seemed as if the British were going to honor their pledges to the Jews and ignore Palestinian hopes of independence. Speaker 3: The Arabs Had a strong case, but very poor advocates. The Zionists had a case. It wasn't as strong as that of the local Arabs but they had brilliant advocates. Zionism is one of the greatest public relations success stories of the 20th century, and Chaim Weizmann Exemplified these traditional Jewish skills of advocacy and, persuasion. Speaker 0: Some of these skills were clearly in evidence when Weizmann and various Zionist groups helped finance land purchases and the building of settlements for immigrant Jews. At the same time, Political and security organizations were created to support the emerging Jewish homeland. The Arab community in Palestine was incensed. Speaker 2: The Palestinians couldn't conceive their country being divided or given away to Another community, which had nothing to do with the Middle East in the 1st place and was almost wholly European at the time. So to them, it seemed absurd that 600 to 700,000 should give up their land, their homes, their villages, their towns, and hand them over to a minority, which was dispersed, throughout Palestine. And Palestine, after all, is named after its people, who are the Palestinians. Speaker 0: In 1925, Arthur Balfour toured the new Jewish settlements in Palestine. Although he was fated as a hero of the Zionist cause, the immigration of European Jews was to have unforeseen consequences for British rule in Palestine. Speaker 3: I believe that the Balfour Declaration was one of the most serious mistakes in British imperial history. It, committed Britain to, support of Jewish nationalism in Palestine after the war, and, it did not, produced any immediate benefits for Britain. Speaker 6: Without the Balfour Declaration, There could have been no genuine development of a Jewish national home, and the follow through In 1948 where you get the creation of a state of Israel simply would not have happened. It it requires the umbrella of the British to be there, in effect, to support the emerging Jewish national home militarily At the bottom line, the very fact that there are British troops, British policemen there to protect the Jewish communities is ultimately central to the situation. It could not have been done in any other way. Speaker 0: Throughout the 1930s and forties, the years of Nazi persecution in the Holocaust. Jewish immigration to Palestine increased rapidly. But what was seen by the Arabs As an alien incursion and the Jews as a fulfillment of historic rights led to polarization and violence. In response to terrorist acts by Arabs, Britain restricted the immigration. But the policy only stimulated Jewish terrorism. Against this background, Britain relinquished its mandate. And the state of Israel was born in 1948. When the first of several wars between the new state and its Arab neighbors began, thousands of Palestinian Arabs fled their homeland. Thus, the strategies employed by Britain to win the First World War Inadversely left a deep divide between Arab and Jew. Speaker 3: The most serious consequences of British policy during the war was the encouragement of Arab nationalism and Jewish nationalism. And in the aftermath Of the First World War, Britain was left with this legacy of double dealing And of betrayal, which was to haunt her for a long, long time. Speaker 1: Clearly, it played a role in dividing the Arab world into different states, in allowing the establishment of the State of Israel, and in frustrating Arab desires. But if what happened in in Sykes Picot and everything else that happened in the First World War is used as an excuse For the problems of the Middle East now, I think that would be a mistake. But, yes, the roots of what we see today certainly arose from the double dealing of the First war and from the frustrated expectations of that time.

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

The Spider’s Web — The Secret World of Finance

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

"The Spider's Web: Britain's Second Empire | The Secret World of Finance" 🚨 A MUST WATCH 🚨 The City of London financial interests created a web of secrecy jurisdictions that captured wealth from across the globe and hid it in a web of offshore islands. Today, up to half of global offshore wealth is hidden in British jurisdictions and Britain and its dependencies are the largest global players in The Secret World of Finance.

Video Transcript AI Summary

The video discusses how Britain transformed from a colonial power to a modern financial power and how this transformation has shaped the world we live in. It highlights the role of the City of London as the world's biggest global financial center during the days of the British Empire. As the empire declined, the city declined as well. However, British elites found a new role in finance and established offshore havens in British overseas territories. These secrecy jurisdictions allowed for the growth of the offshore system, attracting international banks and facilitating tax evasion and financial fraud. The video also exposes the close ties between the British establishment, politicians, and the financial industry, which has led to a lack of regulation and accountability. The offshore system has contributed to global inequality and hindered development in many countries. The video calls for transparency and the end of offshore secrecy. (150 words)

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: The British soldier. All around the globe, you'll find him From Gibraltar to Hong Kong. Everywhere he stands against the threatening years, Staunch symbol of our common will to order. Speaker 1: The British Empire, the largest empire the world has ever known. For over 300 years, Britain ruled, Its army is conquered, and its bankers proclaimed the might of its currency. But one day it all began to fall apart. 1 by 1, Countries declared their independence from Britain, and no amount of force could reverse the tide. As British elites saw their wealth, privileges and empire disintegrate, they began to search for a new role in a changing world, and they found one in finance. This is a film about how Britain transformed from a colonial power To a modern financial power and how this transformation has shaped the world we live in. In the days of the British Empire, The City of London was the world's biggest global financial center. Speaker 2: The City of London was the kind of beating financial heart of the British Empire. The historians Cain and Hopkins call it the governor of the imperial engine. All these countries in the empire, used to use the sterling currency, and the City of London was kind of the financier of this. So not just inside the sterling zone, but outside the sterling zone as well. Speaker 1: As Britain's empire declined. So too did the city of London. Speaker 3: 1 British army truck is bombed, killing 2 soldiers and wounding 12. As rioting comes daily more widespread on Cyprus. Young people of high school age take an increasing part in the violence. Here, a group of girls are being dispersed after a rock throwing battle with British military police. Speaker 1: With the decline of empire, British commercial interests across the globe were under threat. In 1956, Egypt nationalized the Suez Canal. Speaker 3: A new Middle East Crisis arises as president Nasser of Egypt tells a wildly cheering crowd in Alexandria that Egypt has seized the internationally owned Suez US Canal. Speaker 2: France and Britain issue Speaker 3: a 12 hour ultimatum. Within hours of its Britain's warplanes are winging their way to Egypt, and its bombers attack 5 key cities, including Cairo. Speaker 1: The United States was opposed to the invasion and put pressure on Britain and France to withdraw their troops. Speaker 4: There will be no United States involvement in these present hostilities. It is our hope and intent this matter will be brought before the United Nations general assembly. There, the opinion of the world can be brought to bear in our quest for a just end to this tormenting problem. Speaker 1: Britain was humiliated. The Suez Crisis signified the end of Britain's role as one of the world's major powers. Speaker 5: Following the crisis, there was a run on the sterling on the UK pound. Some people suspect that the American government was encouraging this run on the UK pound. Speaker 1: As financiers withdrew their money from Britain, The value of the pound decreased. To protect the value of the pound, Britain limited the bank's overseas lending. Speaker 5: They were not able to invest abroad. And obviously, they were unhappy. And we don't know exactly the context, but it's very clear that the banks or their representative made a representation to the Bank of England, which in itself was dominated by representative from the banking industry. It seems that they have reached an agreement which was never written. That if the banks, intermediated between 2 non residents in a foreign currency, in that case, dollar that this particular intermediation, this particular deal will not be considered by the Bank of England under its own jurisdiction. Speaker 1: The banks began to create a market for dollars in London called the London Eurodollar Market. To So I'm just wondering if you could just give us a quick overview of the business. The Bank of England, the UK regulator, declared that the London Euromarket accounts were not in London. They were elsewhere, and therefore, it had no responsibility for regulating them. Speaker 6: It's about providing a legal space in which you pretend activity is taking place. And the importance of that is that you pretend it's not taking place in the economy where it really is taking place. So you're taking activity from Place where it's regulated and taxed and pretending that it's happening elsewhere. Now where doesn't really matter. It's just elsewhere. Speaker 1: When American banks realized that London offered the ability to avoid US regulations, They moved their international operations to the city. Around the same time as American banks were moving their international operations to London, another new kind of financial space began to emerge, Far away from London, in Britain's overseas jurisdictions, the last remnants of empire. Speaker 2: Back in the sixties, the Cayman Islands was a complete backwater. The stories go that mosquitoes were so thick In the air, sometimes they're enough to suffocate cows. That's a legend that you hear about the Cayman Islands. I don't know how true it was. But it was there was nothing happening there. Speaker 1: Accountants and lawyers from London arrived in the Cayman Islands and other British dependencies and began to draft a set of financial secrecy laws and regulations. Because these jurisdictions' main selling point was secrecy, they were called secrecy jurisdictions. Speaker 2: What the Cayman Islands was doing was straightforwardly illegal activity. Drugs money was coming in in huge quantities, Tax evasion, whatever whatever you wanted, you could have it. Speaker 1: The Bank of England was observing the developments from London And noted in a report marked secret dated 11th April 1969. We need to be quite sure That the possible proliferation of trust companies, banks, etcetera, which in most cases would be no more than brass plates manipulating assets outside the islands, does not get out of hand. There is, of course, no objection to their providing bolt holes for nonresidents. But we need to be sure that in so doing, opportunities are not created for the transfer of UK capital to the non sterling area outside UK rules. Speaker 2: These small territories, the last remnants of the British Empire, which are still overseas territories today, they are still the last remnants of the British Empire. There are 14 of these overseas territories. 7 of them are bona fide tax havens, including the Cayman Islands, Bermuda, The British Virgin Islands, some of the biggest tax havens in the world today, are still British. Speaker 1: With access to large amounts of offshore money, The euro market grew rapidly. By 1980, it had reached $500,000,000,000. By 1988, $4,800,000,000,000. And by 1997, nearly 90% of all international loans were made through this market. The British Empire had sunk, leaving hardly a trace behind. But the city of London Adapted and survived. The City of London, London's financial district, is a peculiar place. It has been called a city within a city, A state within a state. It is run by an organization called the City of London Corporation. A private company that performs all the functions of a local council with a private police force and private courts. Speaker 7: Those of you who aren't from the UK, some of you even who are, might not be aware just how weird a thing the little city of London is within the big the big London. The city of London is, an a separate entity to, the wider London, And it has its own, head, the lord mayor, who's distinct from the mayor, who runs the rest of London. Speaker 1: Every November, the city stages the Lord Mayor's show, the world's oldest civic procession. Speaker 7: The city of London has long had this curious legal status because, back in 10/66, when William the Conqueror came over, The city was one of the only portions of England that he failed to conquer, and he struck a deal with the city in 10/67 that allowed them to continue functioning. Speaker 1: To this day, the city of London is exempt from numerous laws that govern the rest of Britain. Its political derives from the Middle Ages. The city's electorate is dominated not by its residents, but by the private businesses Operating within the city. Its lord mayor is selected by the heads of medieval guilds. Speaker 8: They have a a representative in the House of Commons called the Remembrancer. Apart from the clerks of the of the House of Commons. He's the only unelected person there. Speaker 7: All other lobbyists have to stop, you know, in the lobby. They're not allowed past the lobby. Speaker 1: The City of London has a permanent Representative in the House of Commons whose role is to report back to the City of London Corporation and to lobby parliament On behalf of the city. Speaker 5: The corporation of London, clearly, it's a uniquely unique and Interesting phenomena that should have attracted, many political scientists, political economists, and economists. But I don't know of anyone who has studied systematically the corporation in London and its impact on policy or economic policy. So we can only surmise. Some people, assume or surmise that the corporation in London is extremely powerful and is able, in one way or another, to shape, British policy, particularly within financial methods. Speaker 8: Clement Attlee, the prime minister after the Second World War, had had something to say about the state of London Corporation. Speaker 7: He did. Thank you. So over and over again, we have seen that there is, in this country, another power than that which has its seat at Westminster. The city of London, a convenient term for a collection of financial interests, is able to assert itself against the government of the country. Those who control money can pursue a policy at home and abroad contrary to that which has been decided by the people. Speaker 1: At the heart of the city of London stands the Bank of England. The Bank of England is not just a central bank. It is also a financial regulator. At the demise of empire, the Bank of England used this regulatory authority to help attract the world's banks to London. In 1972, the Bank of England issued a license to the Bank of Credit and Commerce International, which set up its head office in London. Within 10 years, BCCI grew into the 7th largest bank in the world. 10 years later, BCCI was bankrupt. Speaker 9: The Deputy director of the CIA Richard Kerr said late today that the CIA did use BCCI To support CIA activities overseas. Speaker 1: But BCCI had not just collaborated with the world's intelligence services. It had also engaged in extensive financial fraud, money laundering, and terrorist financing. Speaker 10: BCCI constituted international global crime of a level that boggles the mind. Speaker 11: Financing terrorism. The Bank of England knew it, says the report. But instead of supervising it properly, it tried to prevent the bank's collapse. Speaker 10: I I'm saying very directly that the Bank of England had sufficient information in front of it to close BCCI 15 months earlier than it did, millions of depositors were hurt in that process. Speaker 1: Numerous whistle blowers from BCCI had contacted the Bank of England. Yet the Bank of Speaker 2: England did Speaker 12: nothing. The Bank of England had plenty of time to intervene and investigate, But it did not do so because the tradition at that time, which still survives, is that a well, actually, you know, you have to just Kinda send hints and talk over lunch tables with the chaps, regulating other chaps, and all would be well. Speaker 1: Robin Lee Pemberton, the governor of the Bank of England at the time of the collapse of BCCI commented, the present system of supervision has served the community well. If we closed down a bank every time we found an incidence of fraud, you would have rather fewer banks than we do at the moment. London was a place for banks to engage in business that was not allowed Where senior bankers did not have to worry about the consequences of their actions. This is one of the reasons why today there are more banks in London than in any other financial center. Speaker 2: In Britain, nobody goes to jail. No bankers go to jail. They generally don't. They are a protected species, and that is part of the offshore business model of the UK is to say, we will protect you. We will bring your money here, and we will look after you. We're not gonna put you in prison. We'll let you do what you want. Speaker 1: Light touch regulation was one way of attracting business to London. Another was secrecy. From the 19 sixties onwards, City of London institutions began to establish offshore branches in former outpost of the British Empire. Their aim was to create offshore centers with strong secrecy legislation in order to attract capital from across the globe. Speaker 2: Swiss banking secrecy is the most famous, the most well known. You put your money in a Swiss bank and they won't they promise not to tell anybody. And that's one kind of secrecy. But Another kind of secrecy, which is very British, is the trust. And the trust is a very, slippery, complicated, And devious mechanism. Trusts emerge, the legend has it from the time of the Crusades when the knights would go off and fight in foreign lands And they would leave their assets in the care of trusted stewards. What trusts do ultimately is they play with the concept of ownership. Ownership is not such a simple thing. So the settler, the knight in this case, would hand over the assets to Someone who these days would be called a trustee, it's often a lawyer. Legally, you are separated from those assets. They're not yours anymore. There's a barrier. You can't be taxed on them. You can't be nobody's gonna find anything about your connection to these assets. Speaker 1: In Britain's offshore jurisdictions, No qualifications are necessary to be a trustee. Anyone can set up a trust and act as a trustee. There is no registry of trusts. There are no bodies to certify that a trust has been set up. Speaker 13: The only persons who know about the creation of this agreement are The trustee and the settlor. There's no obligation to register it. There is no financial reporting obligation of trusts. They're not required to put annual statements onto account anywhere. So, actually, trusts are, To all intents and purposes, invisible arrangements. Speaker 1: Economist John Christiansen was an economic adviser to the secrecy jurisdiction of Jersey For 10 years. Speaker 13: We're not talking about a few million. We're talking now about 1,000,000,000. 1,000,000,000,000 of dollars of copper, which apparently belong to nobody. For tax purposes and for other purposes, they belong to nobody. Everything, works of arts, gold bullion, horse racehorses, cars, real estate, Not just financial assets, but a whole load of nonfinancial assets belong to these trusts, sitting there, belonging to nobody. Now think that one through, because we are talking about maybe as much as $50,000,000,000,000 of assets sitting offshore behind these instruments. Speaker 14: Well, the Cayman Islands are among several British overseas territories who have signed a new information exchange agreement with Britain and the rest of Europe to tackle tax evasion. The countries are now required to automatically provide details of the ownership of bank accounts and how they're used. Cayman became the 1st signatory last week. Speaker 15: It's important that the Cayman Islands should be recognized as the 1st overseas territory to sign such an agreement with the United Kingdom. And I think this importantly reflects The constructive approach that the Cayman Islands has taken in delivering our shared objective of rooting out Tax evasion. Speaker 13: The trust lies at the core of the British secrecy model. They don't use banking secrecy. The Swiss use banking That's why the Brits are doing this. Speaker 1: Trusts are the basic building block of Anglo Saxon secrecy, and they form the basis from which complex offshore structures are created. Every secrecy jurisdiction offers a specific set of services. From trusts to shell companies to secret bank accounts and directors. The combination of these services into complex structures spanning multiple jurisdictions Speaker 2: will often have a trust kind of sitting at the top of it. The trust will be here managing the assets, kind of controlling the assets. Underneath it, the trust own some shell companies. Each one might be in a different jurisdiction. So you might have a trust in 1 jurisdiction whose trustees are somewhere else, Whose beneficiaries are somewhere else, which owns offshore companies somewhere else. Each of these companies might then own assets so that They might own, you know, a bank account, a a racehorse, a yacht, a painting, a portfolio of shares, or whatever. Speaker 1: There are numerous variations of trusts and offshore secrecy structures. There are offshore whose work entails the creation of ever more complex and obscure structures. The aim of these structures is to hide the identity of the owners of offshore assets and allow offshore wealth to be recycled back into global markets. Speaker 16: We're looking on the amount of money, being administrated from tax havens. You see that it is a curve going like this, all the talking we have been doing along with other wonderful people fighting against tech savants has not changed anything. You know? It is the world where you say, go on talking and go on talking. You're interesting me, and I'm going on doing what I want to do. We know everything today because we have had the Panama Papers. We have seen it, and we are not able to upon it. And we are not able to act upon it because this system is really protecting the few people that are having benefit from it. And these are, in percentage very few people, but they are powerful. And I see in the Panama committee that I'm sitting in, The only thing that could change this is to have a public accessible register of the beneficial ownership of trusts and of all kind of companies. It is easy. Speaker 1: The Panama Papers are a collection of leaks from the offshore law firm, Mossack Fonseca. Mossack Fonseca is the 4th largest offshore law firm. The other 9 of the 10 largest offshore law firms are registered in British overseas jurisdictions. When countries complain to Britain about the activities run out of its offshore havens, Britain claims that these places are independent and that there is nothing it can do. Speaker 13: I've heard time and time again from officials in Berlin and in Paris and in Washington and in other countries that they've been told by the British government that, yes, they're well aware of what's going on in Jersey, and they think it's very unfortunate, but they don't have the powers to intervene. Well, that's a straightforward lie. They do have the powers to intervene. They just choose not to. Speaker 2: Britain plays this kind of game of pretending when it suits them to pretend that these places are independent. At the end of the day, Britain, appoints the governor, appoints lots of senior people in these places. They're responsible for foreign relations and defense, and also they can veto their legislation as well. So Britain has a massive degree of control. Basically, it is controlling these places, allowing them a but a political space. Speaker 1: During his time as economic adviser to Jersey, John Christensen frequently Travel to London for talks with various British government departments. Speaker 13: As economic adviser, I had a lot of contact with different departments. Traditionally, UK governments have tried not to interfere in the domestic affairs or places like Jersey. So it happens in a more subtle sort of way. You can go and talk to someone either at the Home Office or the Treasury, And they'd say, we're not actually particularly keen on this piece of legislation. It might be a good idea if you didn't go down that route. And over a cup of tea, that's quite a strong signal. That's a signal, go back to the island and say, they don't want you to do this. Speaker 1: The British government prefers not to interfere overtly. Instead, it communicates its desires through informal discussions. There is no paper trail or official statement. Discussions take place behind closed doors. Speaker 2: The relationship So these places have with London is is very much, about the British establishment and people understanding each other. I mean, Anybody who knows who is British or knows British British people knows that communication between us is often very subtle, and You have to kind of know the codes when people say stuff. I mean, a lot of irony involved and, a lot of, Kind of codified language for British establishment that, people kind of understand how it works. And I think that is very much the case with the British relationship with the tax havens. I think there's a lot of Speaker 1: By keeping its power hidden, Britain is able to claim that these jurisdictions are politically autonomous. Speaker 17: Independence for KMAD is not on government's agenda. That's the message being sent to the UN Special Committee on Decolonization. Attorney Steve Macfield will be representing government at the UN meeting. The committee was set up to help colonies around the world on the road to independence. But mister MacVeal says he'll be making it clear that Cay man is not ready for that transition. Speaker 18: And that message is done. The premier, his cabinet, his party has No mandate from the people of the Cayman Islands to seek independence. That is the message that I will be carrying. Speaker 1: When the Bahamas declared independence from Britain in 1967, the offshore bankers relocated to the Cayman Islands, And continued their business from there. It was the British connection that reassured bankers and their clients that their money was safe. Speaker 2: This British bedrock, that is what has allowed these places to become so trusted by the financial services industry and and offshore and all these people. Speaker 1: In reality, much of the wealth administered in Britain's offshore havens is controlled from London. Speaker 13: The city of London, by and large, likes to do its really dirty work outside London. They might, heaven forbid, Be a a regulator who actually takes the job seriously and starts to prosecute them for fraud in London. So better to do the frauds offshore in Gibraltar or Jersey, where there's much less risk that a serious prosecution will ever happen. Speaker 1: Deals are often discussed and concluded in London, but then registered offshore for tax transparency and regulatory purposes. Speaker 2: What they allow the city to do is to get involved in dirty business. But then when the scandal hits To say, well, they're kind of independent, there's nothing we can do about those places, that's that's not us, that's that's tax haven activity, and we're We're the city, you know, we're we're not involved in that kind of stuff. So it's an incredibly kind of convenient relationship. Speaker 13: The city of London has shaped the the way in which Jersey, Guernsey, and the British overseas territories have developed as tax Havens. I I see these places of the Frankensteins created by by the city of London. Speaker 1: Today, the UK is the world's largest provider of international financial services. Speaker 6: The UK has an almost unique role in global finance. And if you look at data, the kind of Data that we've constructed in the financial secrecy index, you can see the relative shares of each country in The global provision of financial services exports, that's financial services to non residents. Now there are 2 big centers, And everything else is quite small in comparison. Speaker 1: The 2 large centers are the United States, with around 19% of the global market, and the United Kingdom and its offshore jurisdictions, which have around 25% of the global market. Speaker 5: And if you add to that, other jurisdictions, ex colonies. But recently, dependent fairly recently. By which I mean Hong Kong, Singapore, maybe even Dubai and Bahrain, and Cyprus, then you reach a figure of nearly 40%. And I think that figure represents better the position of London in the global financial market. Speaker 2: The soldiers left, the administrators left all the colonies, but they still kept a significant degree of control over the flows from these former, the former parts of empire and the rest of the world. So you could describe it as a second empire. Britain's 2nd empire, sort of hidden financial empire, spanning large parts of the globe. Speaker 1: At the time of the British Empire, the city of London was the world's largest global financial center. Not only Britain's colonies but also independent countries did their banking in London and used the empire's currency for trade and financing. As the Empire declined, so too did the City of London. The UK. So the UK is a very good example of the UK. So the UK is and the creation of secrecy jurisdictions gave banks access to large amounts of cheap money. International banks from across the globe set up branches in London and Britain's offshore jurisdictions in order to take advantage of this new system. Speaker 16: This system has taken the place of the occupation, I mean, up till 62, for France. I don't know for England, but at the same time, England were physically present in India, for instance, or in in, other colonies. And when you look at the money flows through the tax havens, They are increasing when we withdraw from the colonies. We are still plundering developing countries as former colonial powers. Speaker 1: Wealthy individuals, organized crime, and corporations shifted their wealth offshore in exchange for secrecy and no tax. And as countries around the world began to deregulate and open their economies, It became ever easier to do so. Today, as much as half of all global offshore wealth whose flight capital flows mostly into the modern British spider's web. Speaker 13: I think it's no coincidence that Britain's offshore empire emerged more or less at the same time as the collapse of the formal empire. We tend to think of Africa as being a huge net debtor to the rest of the world, but That was the extent of their debts at the end of 2008, a 177,000,000,000. Speaker 1: The debt of Sub Saharan African nations stood at a $177,000,000,000 in 2008. Yet the wealth these countries elites had moved offshore and Speaker 13: $944,000,000,000. Do the maths. Far from being a net debtor, Africa, Sub Saharan Africa is a net creditor to the rest of the world. Speaker 1: As capital moved offshore, African nations borrowed money from international banks at high interest. Over time, these debts became so great that they may never be repaid. Secrecy jurisdictions were starving developing nations of their wealth and their tax revenues. Speaker 19: For a long time, a lot of developing countries, including recently Ecuador, have been trying to set up a UN tax body, which is of a higher value than what is currently there, which is the UN tax committee. And every time this has happened, it has gotten blocked. During the Financing for development process in Addis Ababa last year. I think it was the UK and the US that blocked attempts Again, to set up this, World Tax Organization. So why would they not want to have democratic Decision making in global decisions on how tax gets collected across borders. I don't understand this. As long as we have cross border activity that involves both criminal and legal activity. As long as we're unable to separate the 2, this is going to continue to be a problem. Speaker 1: Western nations block attempts to provide greater transparency of international financial flows and the implementation of global standards for the collection of tax across borders whilst elites in developing nations Speaker 16: And this is true for the copper in Zambia, for the for the gold in Mozambique or in Mali. They have benefited the company that extracted and their shareholders. It has benefit the corrupt elite in the country. Speaker 2: In developing countries, the offshore system of tax havens has facilitated the looting of these countries by their elites. It has enabled them to steal the money and keep it safe somewhere else. Speaker 6: Illicit financial because the anonymity that drives them creates incentives for people in positions of power to be corrupt. This is why there's a group of countries where development progress is so difficult. It's that the incentives of individuals and the ability to pursue them through all the mechanisms that underpin in the shit flows outweigh the type of mechanisms that in that lead you to a powerful representative effective state that can start to deliver development. Speaker 1: Worldwide, and flows into large Western nations like the United States and Britain and enables their currencies to stay strong whilst developing nations currencies remain weak. But illicit flows into Western nations also had another unexpected side effect. The economies of the United States and Britain began to financialize. The origins of this financialization or deindustrialization go back to the 19 sixties. Speaker 3: Anti war demonstrators protest US involvement in the Vietnam War in mass marches, rallies, and demonstrations. President Johnson, meanwhile, let it be known that the FBI is closely watching all antiwar activity. Speaker 1: In the 19 sixties, US economist Michael Hudson was working at Chase Manhattan Bank on Wall Street as Chase's balance of payments economist. Speaker 20: During the 19 sixties, the United states, balance of payments deficit was entirely a result of foreign military expenditures. Speaker 1: Dollars were flowing out of the United states as a result of the cost of the Vietnam War. The United States attempted to prevent the dollars flowing to Vietnam from being deposited in foreign banks. Speaker 20: The government asked Chase to set up a branch in Saigon during the Vietnam War. And as you can imagine, it didn't have, windows. It was sort of a fortress. It lost money, but, the government, went to chase because it said if you don't get This, money that's being thrown off by, the military in, Vietnam, then it's gonna go into French banks. It'll get to general de Gaulle, and you know what is gonna do every month. He's gonna cash it in for gold. That's what the United States is trying to stop. Speaker 1: The US was not successful in stopping the outflow of money, so it began to hatch a different plan. In 1967, Michael Hudson was handed a memo by a former state department employee. Speaker 20: In 1967, I was given by a former state department employee, in the elevator at Chase Manhattan, a memo from the state department urging that Chase Manhattan Would, take the lead in helping the United States become the Switzerland of the world, meaning the flight capital. The state department, through Chase asked me to estimate how much money do you think is available if America were to become the new Switzerland? And how do we do it? The plan was to organize offshore banking centers, in the Caribbean and elsewhere. And the hot money wouldn't come directly in the chase because that wouldn't be, nice and, very illegal. What happened was that, the Latin American criminals, other criminals, drug dealers, all sorts of organized crime would put their money in the offshore Caribbean banks, and these offshore banks would then, deposit the inflow In the head office. Speaker 1: By moving offshore dollars back into the United States, the US was able to stop the outflow of dollars and support the value of its currency. Speaker 20: Every country looks to its foreign exchange rate. And, the foreign exchange rate is not only imports and exports, it's capital movements. And if you look at the International monetary funds, monthly international financial statistics. You have sort of a steady balance of trade, a steady immigrants remittances. What goes up and down are called errors and omissions. What the United Nations and, the IMF call errors and omissions our flight capital. It's the, the reason that it's omitted is, they don't like to really look at this. In the 19 thirties, Roy Ovid economist for the US commerce department wanted to include, criminal movements in the balance of payment statistics, and, congress got Very upset. I I I was told in Washington, the cut the, argument was we're a Christian country. We don't wanna crime. It's just don't look at it, and, they they forbid him to, include, criminal money in the balance of payments. I guess now You call it errors and omissions. You don't call it, criminal inflow and outflow. Speaker 1: In the 19 sixties seventies, Britain was faced with a similar dilemma as the United States. Money was flowing out, and this decreased The value of the pound. Britain realized that it too could support the value of its currency by opening its domestic markets to the 1,000,000,000 1,000,000 of dollars passing through its offshore havens. But just as in the United States, this had an Unexpected side effect. Speaker 20: The British banks, today, just as in the 19th century, don't put their money into, British manufacturing. They put their money into real estate speculation, into financial speculation, foreign currency trade. So, the financialization of London has, helped deindustrialize the country because it's enabled, Sterling to be supported by this huge inflow of Hot money. This inflow of, drug dealing money and criminal money and, tax evasion money all over the world, that is going to London instead of going to Switzerland, Liechtenstein, or the Caribbean. Speaker 1: With the silent backing of the United States, Britain's offshore havens grew rapidly. And before long, the offshore system developed into the world's dominant international financial market. Few were aware how this market functioned. In 1986, economist John Christensen went offshore to investigate. He applied for a position at the Jersey office one of the world's major accounting firms. Speaker 13: But Deloitte and Touche, I was, I was working in what's called company and trust administration, straightforward offshore stuff. I went offshore specifically to work in that area because that's where you're dealing with the offshore companies, the shell companies, the offshore trusts, and you're administering them. That way, I could I could see from working inside, a big global accounting firm, exactly what the clients were doing. I had complete access to all the client files. And over the course of my period of working with Deloitte Touche, I investigated over a 100 of their clients offshore, and this is what I found. There were some insider traders, some market rigging, some avoiding disclosure of conflict of interest, illicit arms trading, illicit political campaign donations, contract kickbacks, bribery, fraudulent invoicing, trade mispricing, and, at the bottom, tax evasion. Okay? This is what the clients were doing. The basis of a sample of the clients that I looked at, Not a single client was involved in what I would regard as genuinely legitimate activity. They were all involved in some kind of tax dodging or, worse. Speaker 16: I met with Karl Levin. He used to be an American Senator, And he made a lot of inquiries into private banking, asking question to the bankers. What do you think the percentage is among your clients that are using these companies for legitimate purposes, and the answer was, I believe that 99.9% of my Clients are using these companies for illicit purposes. This is a reality. This is American bankers telling what they are doing. And it's exactly the same thing with, UK bankers helping their clients to have accounts in Panama or in Bermuda or in Cayman Islands. Speaker 1: Secrecy jurisdictions are heavily used for fraudulent and gray area financial activities, areas where secrecy is not just desirable, but a necessity. Legitimate financial activity Has no need for the secrecy offshore havens provide, nor a desire to pay the high fees offshore banks and law firms charge. In public, these jurisdictions claim they are transparent and their financial services sectors are engaged in legitimate financial activities. Speaker 21: Our economy is not based on secrecy. It's, it's based on transparency. It's based on a sound regulatory environment. It's based on good governance and good government, with the British government, legal system. That's what our, financial institutions are based on. Speaker 17: Well, tonight we have a response from the head of Cayman Finance after a group of US based anti tax evasion activists Announce plans to travel to Cayman to draw attention to what they feel is corporate tax evasion. Finance Chairman Mr. Richard Cole says he's encouraging the group to visit And says our financial sector has nothing to hide. Speaker 22: I would say if anybody wants to come to Cayman to find out what what's coming, you know, what what we do here, Come on down. We have no secrets here. Speaker 2: When I went to the Cayman Islands, back in 2008, I think it was. I called the government spokesman. He said, okay, we have had an order from on high that nobody is allowed to speak to you. You are off limits. Speaker 1: In 2011, journalist Nicholas Schaxson released Treasure Islands, a groundbreaking book about the offshore system. Speaker 14: The author of a series of international media reports says he would welcome a debate with Cayman finance chair Tony Travers. Mr. Travers recently called Nicholas Jackson, an imbecile with the understanding of an of an 11 year old. There are always going Speaker 23: to be the politics of envy. Now the politics of envy are exacerbated by, imbeciles who don't actually understand what's going on in the Cayman Islands. I Speaker 1: The Cayman Islands is the 5th largest financial center in the world. It hosts 80,000 registered companies, over 3 quarters of the world's hedge funds and $1,900,000,000,000 in deposits. It has a population of 60,000, roughly equivalent to New York's homeless population. A strange mixture of characters populate the offshore world. British ex public schoolboys, Members of the world's intelligence services, global criminals, assorted lords and ladies, and bankers galore. With so much at stake for so many wealthy and powerful individuals, it may come as no surprise that Britain's offshore havens have developed their own curious mechanisms to prevent information from leaking out. Speaker 13: For many people who work off Sure. And you don't like what they're doing. It's very hard indeed to dissent, because they will be attacked personally with a degree of viciousness, which is quite extraordinary. Most of the time, the the the instruments of suppression are relatively sophisticated. You won't get promotion by doing this or your family won't like it. Speaker 2: It's not generally, let's Slam them in prison. That's far too crude. We are talking about very substantially, you know, the establishment, the British establishment in in these cases. The the mechanisms are very, very subtle. Sort of ostracism is is is one way of doing it. Mechanisms for, you know, if someone tries to to blow the whistle, you find all sorts of methods that aren't the might you know, Just fire them. You give them far too much work to do. You steer them in a different direction. Speaker 1: One person who is intimately familiar with how suppression works offshore is former Jersey senator and health minister, Stuart. In 2009, he leaked a report on a rogue nurse suspected of killing patients at Jersey's Hospital. Speaker 24: It all came to a head during a state's debate on Tuesday 10th March. Senator Stuart Syvray brought the sitting to a standstill, claiming senator Jimmy Pershard sworn at him and told him to go and top himself. Senator Peirchard denied the claim saying, I absolutely refute that. But less than a week later, he was forced to admit he'd lied. Senator Peirchard has now admitted that on another occasion, he Did tell senator Stuart Zivray to go and do everyone a favor and slit his wrists. Speaker 25: I was, Arrested at my house 1 morning, by, 6 plainclothes police officers. There were another 2 specialist data search police officers on hand and also another 2 police officers in full body armor of one of those battering rams they're kind of using drugs rates. So 10 police officers descended without a, without a search warrant. The property was turned over from top to bottom. All of the computers were seized and searched. All kinds of Private constituency data was stolen by the police. Speaker 1: Shortly after we began filming, a police officer exited the police station. As he hurried past, he grinned at the camera. The officer was on his way to test The sirens on his motorbike, which he did at intervals throughout much of the remainder of the interview. Speaker 25: When it came to prosecuting, Speaker 1: Stuart Syvret was prosecuted under the data protection law. Speaker 25: When the authorities were prosecuting me, I claimed that this This was a legitimate public interest disclosure defense, and I, with an expert witness, was able to produce a set of reports that effectively Floyd, the prosecution case. Speaker 1: In reaction to this, the magistrates ruled that Stuart Sidre's defence case, that he had leaked the report in the public interest, would no longer be admissible, But continued to prosecute him all the same without a defense case. Over the past 7 years, Stuart has been repeatedly taken to court and imprisoned 3 times. He does not know when or if the persecution will end, nor does he know when he will find himself behind ours again. Speaker 25: To look at Jersey from the outside, it looks like it's got a prosecution system. It looks like it's got a court and a legislature, but none of it's real. It's a Potemkin village. None of these systems in Jersey meet the tests of being objective of being objective will actually functioning properly. Speaker 13: The experience that Stewart Sivray had is, you know, he's perhaps at the at the blunt simply suppressed and taken to court on trumped up charges. Speaker 25: Carry on 10 to the internet. They might report. This is the kind this is the kind of how oppression happens in Jersey, you see. All kinds of metal things get done to harass people, you know, even they don't often go to the kind of extremes that they did against me in actually arresting me and putting me in prison. But, the authorities use all kinds of other lesser little Methods to interfere with people, kind of sabotage things, you know, obstruct people, make life difficult for people. You know, if you annoy the establishments in Jersey, you won't get a job here. You know, you know, your children won't get decent jobs. You know, that's kind of how how it Speaker 13: I went to Jersey in, March 2009 with with Nick Schachsel. About 24 was after we arrived in Jersey. We were there for several days. Nick said, did you know that have you noticed that we're being followed? Ever since we arrived in At the airport, we've been followed. He said, don't look now, but we're being followed now. Turns out he was quite correct. We Were being followed. And I found that very disturbing, very disturbing indeed. Speaker 1: They have a saying in Jersey. If you don't like it here, there's always a boat in the morning. Jersey finance promotional literature States, Jersey represents an extension of the City of London. Speaker 13: It's where the City of London chooses to do mainly the activities which they couldn't do in London itself. Speaker 8: We're here to just talk about this one company called Appleby. I'll just what they say on their website. Members of the firm, Appleby, have gone on not only to political office, but also, in a number of centers, Bermuda, Jersey, the Isle of Man and the Cayman Islands to senior judicial office. So, essentially, they're boasting of the fact that their staff and their partners have a real interchange between the people that are in power in these offshore financial centers. Speaker 1: The same lawyers and accountants who set up and administer offshore trusts also occupy senior political positions. In Britain's offshore world, most politicians are in business. They lobby for business and promote business interests. They draft, refine, and pass legislation. Politicians sit on the boards of the companies they are supposed to Speaker 26: There is no place for dirty money in Britain. Indeed, there should be no place for dirty money anywhere. The challenge I'm laying down for every country today is to root out the rot of corruption to ensure transparency over what your own companies are doing, require transparency for foreign companies in your country too, And work with us to spread this approach to transparency around the world. Speaker 1: In public, British politicians claim they are cracking down on secrecy jurisdictions and corruption. But in practice, they Do the opposite. Speaker 13: And when I talk to politicians in Brussels, they say that they've had more lobbyists from London and including politicians, to come to them to protect the city of London's interests than they've had every other European member state combined, which gives you some idea of the extent to which British Speaker 14: We begin with our big story. Keyman's efforts to ensure transparency in its financial sector is being recognized by the international community. Earlier this week, the UK's prime minister David Cameron told parliament that the tax haven label placed on It's crown dependencies and overseas territories is unfair. Speaker 1: Many British politicians have personal and business ties with the City of London and British secrecy jurisdictions. Former British prime minister, David Cameron's father, Ian Cameron was an expert in offshore funds and was involved in offshore trusts from the 19 eighties onwards. Speaker 27: At this courthouse behind me here in Synch Helia, we found this. It's a document called a Grant of Pro debate, and it's attached to the English will of none other than Ian Cameron, David Cameron's father. Speaker 13: Hi, Mark. How are you? Good to see you. Speaker 27: Ian Cameron was certainly a wealthy man. In 2009, his personal fortune was estimated by researchers for the Sunday Times Rich List at ten £1,000,000. Yet, when Ian Cameron died in 2010, his estate was much smaller than might be expected, just £2,700,000. Speaker 13: In many cases, it's the politicians, and their cronies, and their families, and so on, and the business people who sponsor the political parties, who using these offshore services themselves. So they've got no personal interest in closing it down. If they wanted to close it down, they could do it tomorrow. The fact of the matter is they don't want to do it because they themselves are complicit with the process. Speaker 2: If you come from the same kind of background, you know the right people, Then all the kind of legal niceties of will will often fall away. You can get away with doing all sorts of things that they wouldn't just let any old And, you know, if you came knocking on the door saying, can you set up an offshore company to do this? They'd tell you to get lost. But if you're part of the networks, you can do these kinds of things. So that's a very important part of the, part of the whole system. Upper class British public school kind of, establishment that has been there since, you know, for centuries. Speaker 1: The British establishment, an old boy's network of privileged elites, From administrators of Empire into financial handlers for the global elite and multinational corporations. As more money flowed offshore, societies around the globe began to feel the impact of the offshore world. Speaker 16: The reality is not What you believe that, your prime minister has, the power to to decide on the future of your country? The power is hidden here. Speaker 6: We have country after country around the world where the lack of financial Transparency about taxation, about ownership, about corruption has undermined the extent to which governments deliver representative policy making for their citizens. You know, we have extreme cases like the hiding of tax evasion by people in finance ministries in Greece, in France. But we also have This system that in general is geared towards anonymous company ownership, the anonymous ownership of properties across London, of half of the land in Do we really think that any circumstances in which governments work better, in which markets work better, in In which the distribution of income and assets is better, when we allow so much to be hidden. Who wants to not know who you're doing business with, who wants their government to have people working for it or to be led by direction for the world. Speaker 16: We need the citizens to understand what is happening, that they are the ones who is carrying the burden, and that, some individuals having the power are exonerating themselves. Ordinary people are paying taxes. Rich people are not. So this is inequality, and it is leading up to populism because it shows so clearly that the people today leading the world are not able to take care of the interest of ordinary people. Speaker 2: Back in the sixties and you know, tax evasion or or pushing back against taxation. It was kind of seen as anti establishment. So, you know, Rolling Stones and, Phil Collins, all these people kind of going offshore, going away. It was seen as a sort of rebellious thing to do. And if you Fast forward to the present day, now that is the establishment. The offshore system is the establishment. Speaker 1: Today, offshore is the way elites and multinational corporations conduct their affairs. Tax evasion is the way business is done. Speaker 13: This kind of sophisticated cheating requires a huge infrastructure. We like to Talk about the pinstriped infrastructure of highly educated people who think it is their right to help others to cheat societies. Speaker 28: We have a new mafia in town. It does not actually shoot people, does not put bullets in their kneecaps, But this trade is just as deadly. It deprives people of opportunities to have health care, education, Security, justice, and, essentially, a fulfilling life. Speaker 1: Accountants form the backbone of the offshore system. They administer the structures that allow individuals and corporations to shift their money offshore and evade taxes. Speaker 28: There are about 2,500,000 professionally qualified accountants on this planet. About 330,000 are in the UK. Speaker 12: Well known people, well dressed, well fed, highly paid of sitting in city center offices, and they are paid to dream up tax avoidance schemes for individuals and for corporations. Speaker 28: We can all elect a government which says, vote for us. We will give you better health care, better education, better security. Next day, accountant says, sorry about that, folks. You elected this government, but we actually got a tax avoidance scheme. The Amazons and the Google won't be paying any taxes in your jurisdiction. Too bad you voted for it, but actually, you're gonna get something else. Speaker 12: So it's a crazy world that part of the business model at big accountancy firms is how to deny public the services by erosion of tax revenues. And these firms are then rewarded with government funded contracts. And the same firms are then advising, go local governments and the central government. And the same firms then report on the company accounts and tell us all is well. Speaker 28: When I argue this with a price order house Partner in a face to face debate. He said, Professor Sikai, you never give us credit for anything. We generate 1,000,000 of dollars of revenues, And we have lots and lots of satisfied clients. What is your problem? And my response was very simple. That's the language of drug pushers and pimps. Speaker 1: In Britain, a new breed of civil servant was rising to the top. One such civil servant was Dave Hartnett, Who rose to the top of HMRC, the UK tax authority. Dave Hartnett had a new way of collecting tax. Deals would be negotiated on an individual basis behind closed doors. In the case of the largest clients, Dave Hartnett frequently led the negotiations himself. British Telecom was one of the first companies through the programme And received a refund of over £1,000,000,000. BT's chief executive, Ben Theveian wrote, earnings per share up 14% And nice to know that we have a £1,000,000,000 credit from the taxman. Dave Hartnett claimed this approach was more efficient. Speaker 29: Litigation in the courts is really phenomenally expensive in this day and age all over the world. And I think it's to be avoided where possible. And the art is to persuade people to pay by strength of argument and the like. Speaker 1: After protests erupted in 2011, the treasury select committee questioned Dave Hartnett. Dave Hartnett claimed he could not give any information due to taxpayer confidentiality. Speaker 29: What in statute prevents you from disclosing information to parliament? All my advice, mister so far has been that, I am prevented, and my colleagues are prevented, by the Act and by the decision of the commissioners. Speaker 1: Dave Hartnett failed to mention that the legal advice he had received stated that the disclosure of information was at the discretion of the head of HMRC. The head of HMRC was Dave net himself. Speaker 28: Just like the mafia has penetrated the state, accountancy firms have also penetrated the state. The head of anti avoidance in the UK, tax authority, is from one of these firms. The newly appointed chairman of her majesty's revenue and customs, which is a tax authority, is a partner from KPMG. Their partners have penetrated the state. They are running the treasury. Speaker 1: Britain's financial services industry had penetrated the state and began to shape its laws for its own benefit. Speaker 13: The degree of capture political capture by the City of London, by the big banks and the big law firms, is so enormous that the politicians have effectively become their spokespersons. Speaker 1: With the government unwilling to act in the interest of the public, a group of protesters confronted Dave Hartmut at a private event in Oxford. Speaker 30: Hi, everybody. I'm sorry to interrupt. It's gonna take a few moments of your time. Here tonight to present today's hidden awards is the Lifetime Time achievements award for services to corporate tax planning. Speaker 31: Thank you. Thank you very much. Speaker 20: David has Speaker 30: been a great friend in the industry, a great friend to many of us over the years, and, you know, really, we just can't thank him enough What he's done Speaker 31: And obviously, it was at Vodafone. You know, it saved us 1,000,000,000, off our tax bill. And our friends at Goldman Sachs as well, we've also Speaker 30: Saved just 1,000,000 2025 1,000,000 Speaker 3: in a These people are trespassers and intruders. Speaker 31: And I know you've had problems with actually, Speaker 2: this has done Speaker 3: a lot more and they will go soon. Destroyed. We will depart immediately before we set the dogs on you. Speaker 13: Okay. Go. Speaker 30: I'm sorry. Please You're Speaker 1: After his retirement, Dave Hartnett moved to the private sector. One of his positions was at accountancy firm Deloitte where he advises foreign governments on corporate taxation. Dave Hartnett is a companion of the Order of the Bath, an honor bestowed on him by the British monarch. Speaker 12: We have former, Lear ministers acting as advisers to Accountancy firms. Accountancy firms provide jobs and consultancies for potential ministers. To my mind, really, it's an indication of corrupt structures. People are buying and selling influences. When a mere former minister works for an accountancy firm, he's not providing any accounting knowledge. Is opening political opportunities home and abroad. That is what they are doing. Speaker 13: I hope by now you'll share my views that I don't trust most bankers, I don't trust most lawyers, I don't trust most accounting firms. I actually think they're engaged in a conspiracy against public interest. Speaker 1: In Britain, secrecy and complexity in finance and government Help to obscure corruption in public office. Financial structures are often so complex that even after they are publicly revealed, They are not widely recognized for what they are. An example of this is PFI, the private initiative. Speaker 32: PFI is private finance initiative. It is a way of funding public infrastructure, Things like hospitals, schools, roads and bridges, but financing them via the private sector rather than historical method, which is via central government. Over a period of 30 or 40 years, the amounts of kind of repayment costs will be sort of 3 or 4 times higher overall than if you borrowed it from central government in the 1st place. So it's basically a giant accounting scam. Once the PFI policy has been set up, you find that the big four accountancy firms were actually, Paid members of staff within the treasury department, who were then actually going around and selling and advising upon the implementation of PFI by public authorities. Speaker 12: Effectively saying, come to us, and we will show you how to derive the most benefit from it. In other words, how to Perhaps exploit the legislation. Even the offices Speaker 32: of the state tax authority are now owned offshore. HMRC, which is the the tax collector here in the UK, their offices are owned in Bermuda by a company called Make These Steps, it's quite incredible. Speaker 1: The company that owns the PFI contract to run HMRC's head office, borrowed money from offshore investors at 15% interest. Because the interest was so high, the company was losing money. Therefore, it did not pay tax. In 2011, HMRC could not prove that any PFI company was paying any tax in the UK. Speaker 32: I think we need to have a serious conversation about the the role of government in this whole debacle and how much our government is being penetrated by Big banks and accountancy firms and, ultimately, in whose interest it operates. The reason we were protesting outside the Africa PPP conference is that we wanted to make sure that Citizens back in Africa should hear about the fact that such policies have been a complete failure here in the UK. We know that these products are not being marketed to African countries in their own best interests. The only motivation is to spread the reach of financial services into new markets. It's all being promoted in the interests of the City of London. What you're seeing is Basically, a second form of colonization. You've had, initially, occupation resource extraction. You know, And through that process, you know, countries like Britain, which have had a a large offshore empire, have developed significant networks. And now are those networks being used to promote and exploit financial services? Speaker 1: The city of London was was the beating financial heart of the British Empire. As Britain's empire declined, the city transformed itself from a hub Operating the financial machinery of empire into a global financial centre. Former insignificant outposts of empire became the basis for a spider's web of offshore secrecy jurisdictions that captured wealth from across the globe and funnelled it to the city of London. Today, 25% of international finance is conducted on British territory. Almost half of the world's secrecy jurisdictions are under British protection. Up to half of all offshore wealth may be hidden in Britain's offshore havens. Financial services is how Britain's elites make their money. And it is also where former government ministers, senior civil servants, and retired from Mi5 and Mi6 receive lucrative consulting positions after their time in public service. Together, they have transformed Britain and its dependencies into the world's largest tax haven, Harming development throughout the world, and turning Britain itself into a country that serves, above all, the interests of its elites.

@Vltra_MK — Michael Rae Khoury

Posted - January 10, 2024 at 3:54 PM

Saved - April 21, 2024 at 11:48 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

The 13th Amendment, which prohibited citizens from accepting titles of nobility or foreign emoluments, mysteriously disappeared between 1810-1870. Various State and Federal publications had published the original amendment for over 65 years. There are questions about why this amendment was removed and how much of American history is inaccurate. Additionally, there are posts discussing the powerful Germanic bloodline, House Wettin, and their control over European thrones and intelligence agencies. Another post reveals the dark truth about the CIA, describing it as a paramilitary mafia that manipulates presidents, rigs elections, and engages in illegal activities. The CIA was created by British Intelligence during World War II.

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

The 13th Article of Amendment was ratified Wednesday, December 9th, 1812 and published in various State Statute books for over 65 years [MISSING AMENDMENT]... “If any citizen of the United States shall accept, claim, receive or retain, any title of nobility or honour, or shall, without the consent of Congress, accept and retain any present, pension, office or emolument of any kind whatever, from any emperor, king, prince or foreign power, such person shall cease to be a citizen of the United States, and shall be incapable of holding any office of trust or profit under them, or either of them.” It was mysteriously replaced between 1810-1870. The following 60 plus Google Book links are to the Original (now missing) 13th Amendment as found published for over 65 years in various State and Federal publications. Why would they want this Amendment removed? How much of our American History is a Lie? (see link below)

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

See links: https://redress4dummies.wordpress.com/1812-original_13th-amendment/ TONA sources: web.archive.org/web/2016031114…

The 1812 Original 13th Amendment The 13th Article of Amendment was ratified Wednesday, December 9th, 1812 :-) and published in various State Statute books for over 65 years, Yet the BAR wants us to believe it was all a mistake . . LMFAO Scroll down this page to see the 50+ Google Book's hyperlinks proving this mysterious Amendment was not so mysterious… redress4dummies.wordpress.com

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

How is this possible? https://t.co/NUMa8akhaB

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

The Cabal - Royals still rule us... >The Bloodline< House Wettin, aka House Coburg and Saxe Gotha is a supremely powerful Germanic medieval bloodline dating back to 900AD. All the monarchs of Europe are either directly descended or directly related to this bloodline. This powerful cabal of royals has (throughout history) ruled the thrones of many European countries, including Portugal, Bulgaria, Poland, Germany, Russia, Liechtenstein. And they still rule the thrones of key European countries such as the United Kingdom, Belgium (HQ of EU) and the Netherlands to this day. They (via their intelligence agencies) secretly control everything in the western world. Many people view elite European and American oligarchs as the "cabal," but the truth is that Royals are the top of the food chain - legally more powerful than all oligarchs, politicians, and generals combined. They even control the United States via their corrupt deal with the CIA and FBI - blackmailing, bribing, or assassinating anyone who dares to get in their way (including Presidents).

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

Infiltration over Invasion: Black Ops 101 thread https://t.co/CpO9YuLvGb

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

< Black Ops 101 > The Dark Truth About the CIA ☠️ FULL THREAD 🧵 Many people think that the CIA is a patriotic organization that protects Americans from danger, and informs the President about what's happening in the world so he can make good decisions. But that couldn't be further from the truth. The truth is that the CIA is a vicious paramilitary mafia, that rigs elections, overthrows governments, kills people, and manipulates our presidents into doing their bidding. They are the world's foremost experts in lying, cheating, and stealing from other countries. They sow chaos, degeneracy, corruption, and violence everywhere they go. 🥷🏽Uses Terrorists & Criminals as Assassins 💰Blackmails & Bribes Politicians Worldwide 💵Funded By Slavery & Drug-Dealing 👑Uses Authority of the British Crown How It Started 🔥 The CIA was created by British Intelligence during WW2, when MI6 came over and taught Americans the ruthless tactics they had been developing for centuries.

@Vltra_MK — Michael Rae Khoury

Posted - January 24, 2024 at 12:34 AM

Saved - January 24, 2024 at 2:41 PM

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

The CIA uses the authority of the British Crown 👑 https://t.co/8UZPLr8Qyn

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

< Black Ops 101 > The Dark Truth About the CIA ☠️ FULL THREAD 🧵 Many people think that the CIA is a patriotic organization that protects Americans from danger, and informs the President about what's happening in the world so he can make good decisions. But that couldn't be further from the truth. The truth is that the CIA is a vicious paramilitary mafia, that rigs elections, overthrows governments, kills people, and manipulates our presidents into doing their bidding. They are the world's foremost experts in lying, cheating, and stealing from other countries. They sow chaos, degeneracy, corruption, and violence everywhere they go. 🥷🏽Uses Terrorists & Criminals as Assassins 💰Blackmails & Bribes Politicians Worldwide 💵Funded By Slavery & Drug-Dealing 👑Uses Authority of the British Crown How It Started 🔥 The CIA was created by British Intelligence during WW2, when MI6 came over and taught Americans the ruthless tactics they had been developing for centuries.

@truthtroll_X — Truth Troll Official™️

Posted - April 1, 2024 at 8:32 AM

Saved - August 1, 2024 at 10:08 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

I've been sharing insights on the Russia-Ukraine-NATO conflict, highlighting key events and perspectives often overlooked. I discussed NATO's eastward expansion, the CIA's long-standing involvement in Ukraine, and the role of U.S. officials in the 2014 coup that led to significant violence against Russian-speaking citizens. I also touched on the implications of foreign aid, the existence of biolabs, and the broader geopolitical stakes involving globalist agendas. The narrative often presented by mainstream media doesn't capture the full complexity of this situation.

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

1/17. I’ve been asked to make my Russian/Ukraine/NATO War into a THREAD 🧵 It is known that James Baker in 1990 said that NATO agreed it would not move “1 inch eastward.” Although the map below is outdated, it does show NATO expansion. See also the community note.

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

“The Putin Interviews” depicts Oliver Stone and Putin discussing Ukraine joining NATO in 2017!

Video Transcript AI Summary

НАТО влияет на страны, не давая им контролировать решения. Американское влияние укрепляется в Европе, особенно восточноевропейские страны. Россия сталкивается с негативным отношением из-за кризиса на Украине, но угрозы от нее нет. Страны стремятся укрепить свою независимость и защитить национальные интересы от внешнего давления. Translation: NATO influences countries without allowing them to control decisions. American influence is strengthening in Europe, especially in Eastern European countries. Russia faces negative attitudes due to the crisis in Ukraine, but there is no threat from it. Countries aim to strengthen their independence and protect national interests from external pressure.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Я вижу. И эта угроза заключается в том, что когда НАТО приходит в ту или иную страну, то, как правило, политическое руководство этой страны и население страны не могут влиять на принимаемые НАТО решения, в том числе по размещению военной инфраструктуры, не исключая, например, и постановку очень чувствительных систем вооружения, в том числе и противоракетной обороны. Сейчас происходит определенное укрепление вот этого американского влияния, в том числе и в Европе, в том числе за счет восточноевропейских стран, потому что они еще находятся в парадигме противостояния другому доминанту в виде бывшего Советского Союза, это перекладывается все на сегодняшнюю Россию, но рано или поздно это закончится. Смогли с помощью инициирования кризиса, скажем, на Украине возбудить такое отношение к России как к возможным агрессорам. Но всё-таки очень скоро всем самим понятно, что никакой угрозы со стороны России не исходит ни прибалтийским странам, ни восточноевропейским, уж ни тем более каким-то более отдаленным в Западной Европе. По мере укрепления этого понимания будет расти желание укреплять свой суверенитет и защищать свои национальные интересы, Постоянно чувствовать на себе какое-то внешнее давление, уверяю вас, это ни у кого не вызывает восторга, рано или поздно это будет иметь свой результат, и это когда-то всё равно закончится.

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

3/17. The CIA have been plotting in Ukraine against Russia a long time.

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

🚨The New York Times disclosed yesterday that the CIA built "12 Secret Spy Bases" in Ukraine, waging a shadow war against Russia for the past decade. After a U.S.-supported violent coup toppled Ukraine's democratically elected government, CIA Director John Brennan visited Kyiv in April 2014. Shortly after, the new Ukrainian government launched an "anti-terror operation" against its Russian-speaking citizens in Eastern Ukraine. For eight years leading up to Russia's invasion in 2022, Ukraine's government, with help from the CIA, relentlessly bombed Eastern Ukraine. Millions of innocent civilians were caught in the crossfire of a geopolitical chess match between Russia and the United States. This is part of the story often ignored by the Western press.

Video Transcript AI Summary

John Brennan possibly traveled to Kyiv under another name, but it's unclear. US VP Biden pledged $50 million in aid to help Ukraine through the crisis. Pro-Russian separatists clashed with ultranationalists, raising civil war concerns. The US aims to support Ukraine's stability and security by providing assistance and information. Ukraine deserves to determine its future free from outside interference.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Various people have said that John Brennan, the head of the CIA, traveled possibly under another name to Kyiv. And I just wanted to know, did he travel there? Does it have anything to do Speaker 1: with this action? Just to No. It it happened only in in the, in some commands from Moscow. I don't know. So Thank you. Were you in Kyiv recently? I was in Kyiv a couple weeks ago. Yes. Mhmm. Could you tell us what your mission was? I was out there to, interact with, our Ukrainian partners and friends. Ukraine's acting president has announced the start of an anti terrorist operation in the east of the country. Today was the day Kyiv sent Is there not a grassroots movement though by Russian speakers in Eastern Ukraine who are not happy with the current situation? We do have difference in my country. That's true. Every country has differences, but we are ready to bridge all this difference. Speaker 2: Easter Sunday was anything but peaceful in this corner of Eastern Ukraine. At least 2 people were killed in a gunfight near Slovians at this makeshift check point manned by pro Russian separatists. They say they were attacked by a convoy of ultranationalists called the right sector whose power base is in the west. Speaker 1: It's not clear what happened here, but this is exactly the kind of incident that can really blow this situation up into a civil war. US officials say the vice presidents in Kyiv to boost economic and political assistance to authorities there. Speaker 3: Speaking to its new pro western leaders, US vice president Joe Biden pledged to help Ukraine through the crisis, including an aid package of $50,000,000. Speaker 4: We can help in stabilizing and strengthening Ukraine's economy Speaker 5: by helping you withstand the unfair economic pressure being thrust upon you. We stand ready Speaker 6: to do that, and I say Speaker 1: ready. Ukrainian people deserve to, determine their future, again, free from outside interference, and that's what the United States is trying to do. And, to the extent that we here at CIA can work with our partners in Ukraine and other areas to give them the, the information, the capabilities that they need in order to bring stability and security back to the country, we will do that.

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

4/17. More on the CIA operating in Ukraine. “The first casualty of war is the truth.” What the media does not tell you…which is a lot.

@C_N_F__on__X - Conservative News Feed

If you listen to the Biden administration and pundits from the left they will tell you that Russia invaded Ukraine. The war would be over if Russia would just pack up their bags and go home. As we all know the first casualty of war is the truth. What if I told you Ukraine has been invaded long before 2022 and not by Russia? The Office For Strategic Services was the intelligence agency for the United States during World War Two. The OSS was dissolved a month after the end of the war. The war ended but the intelligence gathering and espionage was just getting started. The OSS was disbanded in 1945 but it never really went away. The CIA has been involved in clandestine activities shaping geopolitics all over the globe since its inception in 1947. The CIA has been confirmed to be responsible for disinformation campaigns, color revolutions, regime changes and assassinations. Do you really think the US had nothing to do with the Maidan Coup and the reshaping of Ukraine? #DeepState

Video Transcript AI Summary

The truth about US interference in Ukraine, dating back to WWII when CIA worked with Ukrainian Nazis, led to the rise of extremist groups like Svoboda and Right Sector. Yanukovych's refusal of IMF's offer sparked a US-backed coup orchestrated by the State Department and Joe Biden. The push for war against Russia serves globalist interests, not patriotism.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: The first casualty of war is the truth. And if the American people knew the truth about US interference in Ukraine, they might not be so eager to start World War 3. During World War 2, Western Ukraine sided with the Nazis. After the war, the CIA helped Ukrainian Nazis evade the Nuremberg trials and began operating with them within the Ukraine. After decades of CIA infiltration, Speaker 1: the Ukrainian People's Movement Speaker 0: the Ukrainian People's Movement emerged in 1989 and gave birth to extremist groups, Svoboda, Trident, and Right Sector. Neo Nazi groups pushing for the ethnic cleansing of Ukraine. Extremist groups cultivated by the CIA, supported by the US state department, and used by the IMF to bring Ukraine to heal. When Yanukovych beat NATO backed Yushchenko in the 2010 elections, his government was being pressured into signing an EU association agreement by the International Monetary Fund in their typical conquer by debt offer that would financially ruin the Ukraine and place them at the mercy of the World Bank. Yanukovych declined their offer. And in today's corrupt world, you're not allowed to say no to the IMF. Funded by western NGOs associated with George Soros and the CIA, a highly organized color revolution was immediately deployed against Yanukovych. Leaked phone calls reveal that the US state department was orchestrating this coup d'etat from within the US embassy with support from vice president Joe Biden. Speaker 2: Sullivan's come back to me, VFR saying, you need Biden, and I said, probably tomorrow for an attaboy and to get the deeds to stick. So Biden's willing. Speaker 1: So you had this remarkable phone call where you have these 2 senior officials of the US government apparently talking about a coup or how they were planning to restructure the government of Ukraine. Speaker 2: Fuck the EU. No. Exactly. Speaker 0: Supporting a criminal war against Russia does not make you a patriot. It makes you a useful idiot of the globalist banking cartel. The very same entities waging war on all of humanity with vaccine passports and experimental jam.

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

5/17. The Joe Biden connection in Ukraine….2014.

@ChrisToddNolan - Christopher Todd Nolan

A few years ago I made a series of documentaries on the war in Ukraine. This relatively short video is a summary of how it really began in 2014. An unelected government began killing its "own" people in the south-east of the country after visits from Joe Biden and John Brennan.

Video Transcript AI Summary

Masters of war build guns, sparking protests turned revolution in Ukraine. Yanukovych's refusal to sign EU agreement led to his removal. Russia's involvement in Crimea and Eastern Ukraine escalated tensions. US offered support to Ukraine, condemning separatist referendums. Violent clashes ensued, with accusations of Ukrainian forces causing civilian casualties. Ceasefire ended, military actions resumed. The conflict continues, with both sides engaging in armed confrontations.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Come, you masters of war. You that build up guns. Speaker 1: Is there now going to be some sort of mass public Speaker 2: protest movement? Speaker 3: How does this suddenly morph from a protest into a revolution, as the protesters are calling, looking to topple an elected government. Speaker 2: It's not an easy job to topple the government, to change the president, to sign an association agreement, but this is our agenda. We are waiting that president Yanukovych return back to Brussels and sign up agreement. Speaker 4: Good to Speaker 0: see you. We're here to come back. Would you like some bread? Speaker 4: Signing the association agreement with the EU would also put Ukraine on a path to strengthening the sort of stable and predictable business environment that investors require. Speaker 5: The free world is with you. America is Speaker 4: with you. I am with you. It would be a huge shame to see 5 years worth of work and preparation go to waste if the if the AA is not signed in the near future. So it is time to finish the job. Speaker 6: We have been actively engaged in what's been happening in the Ukraine. Speaker 4: I don't think cleats should go into the government. I don't think it's necessary. I don't think it's a good idea. I think Yats is the guy who's got the economic experience, the governing experience. Obviously not gonna comment on private diplomatic conversations. Speaker 5: These, brave Ukrainians took to the streets in order to stand peacefully against tyranny. Speaker 6: And we expect, the Ukrainian government, to show the strength, to not resort to violence and dealing with, peaceful protesters. Speaker 5: So instead, they were met with snipers who picked them off one after the other. Speaker 7: From one of the upper windows of the hotel, a shock rang out. I saw the shooter. He was wearing one of the protesters' green helmets. Speaker 8: So that there is a stronger and stronger understanding that behind snipers, they were it was not Yanukovych, but it was somebody from the new coalition. Some journalists who were with me, they saw during the day day that one member of parliament was just beat in front of parliament, pinning credit skies with the guns on the streets. Speaker 7: In special session, Ukraine's parliament voted to remove president Viktor Yanukovych. Speaker 8: Because the richest party also said, well, you will see that if the people from the eastern part of Ukraine will will really wake up and, and and and will start to demand their rights. Speaker 9: And the latest is that several 100 Russian troops, have arrived arrived at a Ukrainian military base not far from here where there is now a confrontation. Speaker 5: You just don't invade another country on phony pretext, in order to assert your interests. Speaker 10: Pro Russian demonstrators came here. They swept their way in. They even raised the Russian flag, but they've now been kicked out. The deputy mayor of this city has told the BBC that he thinks a referendum may be a chance to calm tensions here, to give pro Russian population chance to decide its own status. Speaker 11: Crimeans voted overwhelmingly on Sunday to break away from Ukraine and join Russia in a referendum the west condemned as Speaker 2: the army. Speaker 6: In Ukraine, pro Russian militants have seized a second building in the eastern city of Sloviansk, the local headquarters of the Speaker 12: state security service. Not just the police headquarters or an administration building that's occupied. Here in Sloviansk, the whole city is under control of pro Russia forces because they've got checkpoints on all Speaker 6: the entrances and access. On his Facebook page, the Ukrainian interior minister promised a very tough response. He said there's a difference between protesters and terrorists. Speaker 13: Various people have said that John Brennan, the head of the CIA, traveled possibly under another name to Kyiv. And I just wanted to know, did he travel there? Does it have anything to do with this action? Speaker 5: Just to No. It it happened only in in the in some commands from Moscow. I don't know. So Thank you. Speaker 14: Were you in Kyiv recently? Speaker 15: I was in Kyiv a couple of weeks ago. Yes. Speaker 14: Mhmm. Could you tell us what your mission was? Speaker 15: I was out there to, interact with, our Ukrainian partners and friends. Speaker 7: Ukraine's acting president has announced the start of an anti terrorist operation in the east of the country. Today was Speaker 2: the day Kyiv sent in troops Speaker 7: to try to wrest back control of the east. Speaker 2: Is there not a grassroots movement, though, by Russian speakers in Eastern Ukraine who are not happy with the current situation? We do have difference in my country. That's true. Every country has differences, but we are ready to bridge all the difference. Speaker 16: Easter Sunday was anything but peaceful in this corner of Eastern Ukraine. At least 2 people were killed in a gunfight near Slovians at the snake ship's checkpoint manned by pro Russian separatists. They say they were attacked by a convoy of ultranationalists called the right sector whose power base is in the west. Speaker 17: It's not clear what happened here, but this is exactly the kind of incident that Speaker 18: could really blow this situation up into a civil war. US officials say the vice president's in Kyiv to boost economic and political assistance to authorities there. Speaker 19: Speaking to its new pro western leaders, US vice president Joe Biden pledged to help Ukraine through the crisis, including an aid package of $50,000,000. Speaker 20: We can help in stabilizing and strengthening Ukraine's economy by helping you withstand the unfair economic pressure being thrust upon you. We stand ready to do that, and I say Speaker 15: ready. Ukrainian people deserve to, determine their future. Again, free from outside interference, and that's what the United States is trying to do. And, to the extent that we here at CIA can work with our partners in Ukraine and other areas to to give them the, the information, the the capabilities that they need in order to bring stability and security back to that country, we will do that. Speaker 13: So tell me, why are you here? Who are these people? Speaker 17: There was a fire in the trade union's building in Odessa where the pro Russian protesters have a base of operations. Apparently, at least 30 or in the thirties, numbers of people who died, some figures are 30 one. Other people are saying 38 people at least died, many of them from smoke inhalation and from jumping from the upper stories of the building. It's not clear exactly what started the, the the blaze, and it's not clear who exactly were was caught in the fire. But as I said, there were a number of, pro Russian protesters who was probably there. Speaker 5: We also are are very concerned about efforts of pro Russian separatists in Donetsk and Luhansk, to organize, frankly, a contrived, a bogus independence referendum on May 11th. Speaker 1: Ukrainian forces knew what they wanted, and they came in force. Their assault on Mariupolsk police station sustained. Ukraine says it's a legitimate military action to evict pro Russian militias out of buildings, and many here said nothing more than the action of a fascist regime supported by the west. Rocket propelled grenades fired in city center streets, shooting where yesterday people were shopping. They've recaptured the police station alright, but in saving it, they destroyed it. Speaker 21: This is quite a statement. Ukrainian forces have now left, leaving this behind them. The point they're making, Mariupol, is one time they are not going to surrender without a plan. Speaker 22: Polling stations are being prepared across Donetsk for Sunday's referendum, a vote widely condemned as illegitimate. It's unclear what a yes result would lead to. The question is, do you support the People's Republic of Donetsk? Speaker 4: We do not recognize, the illegal referendum that took place in portions of Donetsk and Luhansk, over the weekend. It was illegal under Ukrainian law and an attempt to create further division and disorder in the country. Speaker 23: We will not recognize the annexation of Crimea and Sevastopol. Likewise, we do not recognize the so called referenda of yesterday. Speaker 24: So if you can't get them to talk to the table, how are you going to take back those areas that they control without the first few months of your presidency being drenched in blood? Speaker 13: Yeah. Those are helicopters now moving in on the airport. Speaker 4: The day after Ukrainian forces launched air strikes to drive separatists from the airport, Speaker 5: Donbas, Speaker 2: defend and clean and bring the peace in the Donbas, including the fighting against terror. This is the one of the main function of the state, to defend the Speaker 0: people. Speaker 3: The bloody aftermath of a strike on the separatist headquarters in the heart of Luhansk. 5 women killed, 3 men, officials say. Speaker 13: Some people were saying there was kind of there was an airstrike in Luhansk, that there was some bomb drop on the administrative headquarters of the separatists. Is it true? No. Speaker 3: The Ukrainians claim that this had nothing to do with a military aircraft which was circling overhead at the time of the attack. But from what we can tell, this looks like very heavy cannon fire from an aircraft strafing through this square. Speaker 5: No bombing, either by from airplanes or artillery were permitted by the, the, you know, leaders of the Ministry of Defense. Speaker 25: So everything that the Ukrainians are doing, I just want to understand your position correctly. Everything that they are doing is actually self defense. Correct? Speaker 26: They're I mean, look. I mean, I don't wanna use the term self defense, but this is Ukrainian territory that they are defending. Speaker 27: US president Barack Obama has offered Kyiv financial and security support during his first meeting with his newly elected Ukrainian counterpart. Speaker 0: Also, Giovanni, my dear friend. I so was together. You were fighting the sun. And when I ask you why, you raise your sticks and cry, and I follow my friend. How did you Speaker 7: These volunteers have joined the so called Azov battalion, a special force raised by the interior ministry in Kiev. Speaker 17: A few hours left until the end of the ceasefire. Speaker 21: Oh, Speaker 10: A truce ends. Within hours, military action resumes. Speaker 7: This morning, an active phase of the anti terrorist operation has been renewed. Our armed forces are launching strikes against the terrorist bases. Speaker 14: Multiple rockets hit a residential area in Western Donetsk called the Petrovsky District, killing 7 people, including 2 children. But in 4 attacks against populated areas that human rights was investigated in Donetsk, the evidence strongly indicates that Ukrainian government forces were responsible. Speaker 26: Among the dead, a female guard at the Lugansk Southern District School killed by Speaker 13: shrapnel. Speaker 0: But built it too strong. You play with my wallet like it's your little toy. You put a gun in his head, and you hide from his hands. And you turn and run farther when the basketball is fine.

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

6/17. In 2014 CIA helped to overthrow Ukraine’s government and install a puppet leader. Not the first time the U.S. has done this and won’t be the last.

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

The 2014 CIA-supported overthrow of Ukraine's democratically elected government. A Ukrainian court recently ruled that the snipers firing on Maidan protestors primarily operated from Hotel Ukraina, a location controlled by U.S.-backed extremists.

Video Transcript AI Summary

The protesters in Ukraine aim to topple the government by urging President Yanukovych to sign an association agreement with the EU. They are supported by the US and other nations. The focus is on creating a stable business environment and preventing violence against peaceful demonstrators.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: How does this suddenly morph from a protest into a revolution as the protesters are calling, looking to topple an elected government? Speaker 1: It's not an easy job to topple the government, to change the president, to sign an association agreement, but this is our agenda. We are waiting that president Yanukovych return back to Brussels and sign that agreement. Speaker 2: Good to see you. We're here from America. Would you like some red Signing the association agreement with the EU would also put Ukraine on a path to strengthening the sort of stable and predictable business environment that investors require. Speaker 1: The free world is with you. America is with you. I am with you. Speaker 2: It would be a huge shame to see 5 years worth of work and preparation go to waste if if the AA is not signed in the near future. So it is time to finish the job. Speaker 1: We have been actively engaged in what's been happening in the Ukraine. Speaker 2: I don't think cleats should go into the government. I don't it's necessary. I don't think it's a good idea. I think Yats is the guy who's got the economic experience, the governing experience. Obviously not gonna comment on private diplomatic conversations. Speaker 1: These, brave Ukrainians took to the streets in order to stand peacefully against tyranny. And we expect, the Ukrainian government, to show restraint, to not resort to violence and dealing with, peaceful protesters.

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

8/17. “Foreign Aid” in other words YOUR money.

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

9/17. Yes Bio Labs did exist. The media lied. 🙄

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

I will leave you with a great documentary on who controls the world economy. BlackRock/ Vanguard and State Street are spoken about… Obviously there is much more that is not mentioned here such as the !sraeli connection and such but maybe another time….. https://rumble.com/vmyx1n-monopoly-who-owns-the-world-documentary-by-tim-gielen.html

MONOPOLY - Who owns the world? Documentary by Tim Gielen This incredibly eye opening documentary reveals something astonishing: the majority of our world is owned by the very same people. Because of this they can control the entire world and impose their wi rumble.com

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

For some reason, many of the posts in this thread got deleted by somebody? I did not get a notice or a message regarding these deletions. So I’m going to add them here again at the end. 🤷🏻‍♂️

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

7/17 “2017 will be the year of offense… all of us will go back to Washington, and push the case against Russia. “

@Arsenalsgatan - moT Bombadil 🏴‍☠️

@WarClandestine

Video Transcript AI Summary

We support your fight for your homeland against Russian aggression. In 2017, we will take the case against Putin to Washington. Our fight is not with the Russian people but with Putin. We promise to bring your bravery to the American people and the world. We believe you will win, and we will provide what you need to succeed. The world is watching because we cannot let Putin succeed here, as it may lead to success in other countries.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: I admire the fact that you will fight for your homeland. Your fight is our fight. 2017 will be the year of offense. All of us will go back to Washington, and we will push the case against Russia. Enough of our Russian aggression. It is time for them to pay a heavier price. Our fight is not with the Russian people but with Putin. Our promise to you is to take your calls to Washington. Inform the American people of your bravery. And make the case against Putin to the world. Speaker 1: I believe you will win. I am convinced you will win, and we will do everything we can to provide you with what you need to win. And we have succeeded not because of equipment but because of your courage. So I thank you, and the world is watching. And the world is watching because we cannot allow Vladimir Putin to succeed here. Because if he succeeds here, he will succeed in other countries.

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

10/17 (video 1)

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

Video Transcript AI Summary

The speaker discusses the war in Ukraine, claiming it benefits American defense contractors like Northrop Grumman and Lockheed through NATO expansion. They criticize the large sums of money being allocated to Ukraine, suggesting it is a money laundering scheme benefiting companies like BlackRock. The speaker highlights loan conditions imposed on Ukraine, leading to the sale of government assets to multinational corporations. They express concern over the exploitation of Ukraine's valuable agricultural land by companies like DuPont and Monsanto, ultimately controlled by BlackRock. The speaker concludes by emphasizing a strategy to keep the population divided and distracted by internal conflicts.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: This is a war that shouldn't ever happen. It's a war that Russians tried repeatedly to settle on terms that were very, very beneficial to Ukraine and us. The major thing they wanted was for us to keep NATO out of the Ukraine. The big military contractors want to add new countries to NATO all the time. Why? Because then that country has to form its military purchases to NATO weapon specifications, which means certain companies, Northrop Grumman, Raytheon, General Dynamics Boeing, and Lockheed get a trapped market. Through March of 2022, we committed a $113,000,000,000. Just to give you an example, we could have built a home for almost every homeless person in this country. We then committed another 24,000,000,000 since that 2 months ago, and now president Biden's asking for another 60,000,000,000. But the big, big are gonna come after the war when we have to rebuild all the things that we destroyed. Mitch McConnell was asked, and we really afford to send spend a 113,000,000 to Ukraine. He said, don't worry. It's not really going to Ukraine. It's going to American Defense Manufacturers. So he just admitted it's a money laundering scheme. And who do you think owns every one of those companies? BlackRock. BlackRock. So Tim Scott, during the Republican debate, said, don't worry. It's not a gift to Ukraine. It's a loan. So raise your hand if you think that that loan is ever getting paid back. Yeah. Of course, it's not. So why do they call it a loan? Because if they call it a loan, they can impose loan conditions. And what are the loan conditions that we impose on? Number 1, of extreme austerity program so that if you're poor in Ukraine, you're gonna be poor forever. Number 2, most important, Ukraine has to put all of its government owned assets up for sale to multinational corporations, including all of its agricultural land, the biggest single asset in Europe. In Ukraine, there's been a 1000 years of war fought over that land. It's the richest farmland in the world. It's the breadbasket of Europe. 500,000 kids almost. Ukrainian kids have died to keep that land as part of Ukraine. They almost certainly didn't know about that slown condition. They've already sold 30% of it. The buyers were DuPont, Cargill, and Monsanto. Who do you think owns all of those companies? BlackRock. Yeah. BlackRock. And then in December, president Biden gave out the contract to rebuild Ukraine. And who do you think got that contract? Accra. So they're doing this right in front of us. They don't even care that we know anymore because they know that they can get away with it. And how do they know that? Because they have a strategy. And that strategy is old, old strategy, which is they keep us at war with each other. They keep us hating on each other. They keep the Republicans and Democrats fighting each other and black against white and all these divisions that they sell.

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

10/17 (video 2)

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

Video Transcript AI Summary

The EPA budget is $12 billion, while Ukraine receives 12 times that amount annually. Even after the war ends, the US plans to spend half a trillion on rebuilding Ukraine. Mitch McConnell stated that the money goes to US military contractors, benefiting the country. This reveals the money laundering scheme involving companies like Raytheon, General Dynamics, Boeing, and Lockheed.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Higher budget for EPA is $12,000,000,000, so that's all we have for the environment in this country. We're giving 12 times that to Ukraine in 1 year, and that's just the beginning because even if the Ukraine war ended today, we're still gonna spend a half a trillion there rebuilding the country. The contracts to rebuild are even bigger than the war contracts. So Mitch McConnell was asked in in March because the Republicans are supposed to be concerned about budget deficits. And he said, can we really afford a $113,000,000,000 he was at? He said, don't worry. It's not really going to Ukraine. It's going to US military contractors, so it's good for our country. Oh, he just admitted exactly what we've all been saying, that it's all just a money laundering scheme. A Raytheon, General Dynamics, Boeing, and Lockheed. Who do you think owns every one of those countries?

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

10/17 (video 3)

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

Video Transcript AI Summary

Russia sends troops to Ukraine to ensure they won't join NATO. After a treaty is signed, Putin starts withdrawing troops, but Biden pressures Ukraine to break the agreement. As a result, many children have tragically died since then.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Is their only warm water port, and they know the new government that we just installed is gonna invite the US Navy into their port. So then the Russians go in. They only send 40,000 people. It's a nation of 44,000,000 people. They clearly do not intend to conquer Ukraine, but they want us back at the negotiating table. The Russians just want a guarantee that Ukraine won't join NATO. Zelensky signs the treaty. Putin's people sign the treaty, and Putin starts withdrawing the Russian troops in good faith. And what happens? Joe Biden sends Boris Johnson, the British prime minister, over to Ukraine in April and forces him to tear up the treaty. And since then, 450 1,000 kids have died who none of them

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

11/17

@RightFight2024 - SheAin'tBlack

@truthtroll_X Would USA attack Mexico if AMLO decided to give Russia or China permission to build military bases on our Southern border? You bet your ass we would! And that's the gist of the Ukraine war.

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

12/17 Ukraine was (is) one of the most corrupt countries on earth. Human trafficking has been a problem, especially since the US got involved. Much like when the US got involved in Haiti, and now at its own borders with the migrant issue, human trafficking is rampant…

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

12/ (Pic 2) I’m not too sure what she could offer as an ambassador?

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

13/17

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

EX CIA AGENT explains why Russia 🇷🇺 cannot let Ukraine 🇺🇦 go. It would be similar to the United States 🇺🇸 letting Canada 🇨🇦 or Mexico 🇲🇽 go to Russia. It just couldn’t happen.

Video Transcript AI Summary

Putin is determined not to lose Ukraine due to its strategic importance for Russia's security, agriculture, and energy pipelines. The US supports Ukraine out of ideology, not economic interest, leading to a geopolitical power struggle. Ukraine becomes a pawn in a global game involving Russia, the US, Iran, and China.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Putin cannot lose. He will not let himself lose. Russia knows. They know they have to have Ukraine. They know that they have to have it to protect themselves against military pressure from the West. They have to have it for agricultural reasons. Ukraine is the agricultural bed to support a future Russia. They have major, oil and natural gas pipelines that flow through eastern Ukraine. They they cannot let Ukraine fall outside of their sphere of influence. They cannot. The United States doesn't really have any economic vested interest in Ukraine. The West siding with Ukraine is exclusively ideological, and it's putting them in a place where they fight a war with Russia so the whole world can see Russia's capabilities. As sad as it is to say, man, Ukraine is a pawn on a table for superpowers to calculate each other's capacities. Right now, we've only talked about Russia and United States. We haven't even talked about Iran. We haven't even talked about China. Right? It is a pawn on a table. This is a chicken fight so that people get to watch and see what the other trainers are

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

13 (pic 2) If Ukraine became NATO and the US figured that Putin wasn’t being a “good little boy“ the US/NATO would impose sanctions on Russia. In the grain trade alone could have devastating effects on Russian food supply.

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

14/17 And for those of you who continue to watch mainstream media for whatever reason? And think you’re getting real uncensored news….

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

Who do you think owns these six companies that own all the media on the planet? You guessed it….. Blackrock But the sheep all think that they’re getting uncensored news every day.

Video Transcript AI Summary

In the early 1980s, 50 companies owned 90% of American media, now just 6 major conglomerates control it all. Comcast is the largest, making $69 billion in 2014, owning NBCUniversal and Hulu. Disney follows with $48 billion revenue, owning theme parks, movie studios, and TV networks. 21st Century Fox makes $32 billion annually, focusing on film and TV, including Fox News. Time Warner lost $100 billion after a merger with AOL, now separate. CBS and Viacom were once one company controlled by National Amusements. Today, 5 conglomerates effectively control the media landscape.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: In the early 19 eighties, roughly 50 different companies owned 90% of American media. By 1992, that number had dropped to less than 2 dozen. And in recent years, that same 90% has fallen to just 6 major conglomerates. Although various mergers and layers of external control make this an inexact number, most of the big six hold interests in film production, cable and broadcast television, news, sports, music, and online streaming. So who exactly controls the media? As of 2015, the largest media company in the world by revenue is Comcast. According to the SEC, in 2014, they reportedly made nearly $69,000,000,000 Like the other conglomerates, Comcast owns nearly every step in media production and distribution. In fact, Comcast is the single largest cable provider on Earth. Content is created through subsidiaries like NBCUniversal, which is then broadcast over TV and the Internet through Xfinity. Comcast is also a major Internet service provider, covering more than half of all US broadband customers. Even online streaming giant, Hulu, is jointly owned by 3 of the big six. The next largest conglomerate is the Walt Disney Company, with reportedly roughly $48,000,000,000 in revenue. Disney has holdings in theme parks, movie studios, and diverse television networks such as ABC, A and E, and ESPN. They also own a number of legacy companies like Pixar, Marvel Entertainment, and Lucasfilms of the Star Wars franchise. The 3rd of the big six is 21st Century Fox, which emerged in 2013 as a spin off of Rupert Murdoch's News Corporation. Today, Fox makes about $32,000,000,000 a year and is predominantly focused on film and television, including Fox News Channel, which made nearly $800,000,000 in ad revenue in 2,014. The last independent conglomerate is Time Warner, with revenues of about $27,000,000,000 In the 19 nineties, they were the largest media company in the world, but an unsuccessful merger with AOL at the peak of the dotcom bubble made them lose nearly $100,000,000,000 in 2002. Since then, AOL and Time Inc, as well as Time Warner's entire cable division, have become separate companies. Because they are now unrelated, Time Warner and Time Warner Cable are the 4th and 5th largest media companies in the world, according to Forbes. Finally, the last 2 are CBS and Viacom. In 2013, they reported about 14 to $15,000,000,000 in revenue each. They used to be a single company controlled by National Amusements, a movie theater chain. Today, although they are individually held, National Amusements owners have enough stock in both to effectively dictate control. So in a way, there aren't even 6 conglomerates, but 5. You state cat You are fake news.

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

14 (part 2) Blackrock – what RFK was referring to earlier and the company who owns not only the media, but the rest of the world, along with Vanguard and State Street

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

Who Is Aladdin? Who controls more WEALTH than any country on earth? #LarryFink #Vanguard #Blackrock #StateStreet #Monarch #WallStreet #AI #ArtificialIntelligence #EFront #Aladdin #ShadowBank #ProjectMonarch #JoeBiden

Video Transcript AI Summary

A robot named Aladdin, created by Larry Fink of BlackRock, controls $21 trillion of the global economy. It directs major banks, investment funds, and traders, dominating ETFs, bonds, and stocks. Aladdin's influence extends to government decisions and real estate markets. With plans to expand further, concerns arise about its growing power and potential impact on wealth distribution. Larry Fink's vision of a super smart robot has evolved into a force reshaping financial landscapes worldwide.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: What if I told you there is a robot that controls more wealth than any country on earth? A robot so powerful that in the last 10 years, it has quietly created the biggest company in the world. This is the story of a robot called Aladdin. It's Wall Street's best kept secret, and it's gobbling up every asset class across every industry. Aladdin now controls $21,000,000,000,000 of our global economy. To put that in perspective, that's more than a $20,000,000,000,000 GDP of the U. S. Or the $15,000,000,000,000 GDP of the entire European Union. The new statesman wrote, the total physical cash of all 7,000,000,000 people in every company, bank vault, wallet and piggy bank in the world is around $5,000,000,000,000 Aladdin has grown into a system responsible for more than 4 times the value of all the money in the world. This one robot directs the actions of the U. S. Federal Reserve, almost every major bank and investment fund on Wall Street and over 17,000 traders. It controls half of all ETFs, 17% of the bond market, 10% of the global stock market and carries out a quarter of a 1000000 trades every day and billions of forecasts every week. Year after year, it hoovers up trillions of data points on every market, every company, every asset and now even each of us, what we buy, sell and say so that it knows what to buy and what to sell far better than any human being. Every major bank, company and investment fund has come to rely on Aladdin and its all powerful AI and algorithms to beat the market. And if they didn't, they've collapsed and failed in Aladdin's wake. And you know what the craziest part of this story is? This robot is just getting started. So where did Aladdin come from and how did it get so powerful? Aladdin is the brainchild of Larry Fink, the founder of BlackRock, and its total dominance has made his company the biggest shadow bank in the world and the most powerful company on earth. The story you're about to hear is equally unbelievable and terrifying. In fact, you would think it was science fiction if it wasn't very real and happening today. This story starts in the 1980s when Larry Fink was making 1,000,000 pioneering mortgage backed securities at Wall Street Bank First Boston. That's right. The same mortgage backed securities that caused the 2,008 global financial crisis 20 years later but back in the eighties he was in an epic wall street rivalry with luis ranieri at salomon brothers made famous as the big swinging dick in Michael Lewis's book, Lies Poker. Back then, Larry was making 1,000,000 for the bank and was on track to be first bottom CEO. And then in 1986, an error in the back office computer models led to Larry making the wrong trades and he lost the company a $100,000,000 The result was Larry leaving the bank as a failure with a stupid computer to blame. With that experience, Larry had just one ambition, to build a super smart robot that could pick out risk and opportunity in the market and do it better than any computer or human could do. In 1988, he launched a new startup BlackRock with a tiny coding team to give birth to this robot. Its name, Aladdin, which stands for asset, liability, and debt derivative investment network. In its 1st 10 years, Aladdin was fed information about every asset, price movement, and risk variable in global bond market, Larry Specialty. And in 1999, when Aladdin turned 11, Aladdin was getting so intelligent at picking losers and winners that Larry began selling access to its data to other Wall Street firms. That same year, he took BlackRock public on the New York Stock Exchange. Straight after the IPO, the dotcom bust burst, pushing a wall of money from the stock market to bonds, which Aladdin had become the undisputed world champion in. Within years, BlackRock had become a $1,000,000,000,000 company. And as money started shifting back to shares, what did Larry do? He bought the asset management arm of Merrill Lynch, which was focused to shares. So the gift for Aladdin's 18th birthday, all the data points for the entire stock market. And suddenly, Aladdin had a new playground analyzing every stock trade and risk factor for every company on the stock market. As a result, today, BlackRock together with his two closest rivals Vanguard and State Street, both of which also rely on a large amount of knowledge have become the biggest shareholders of over 40% of all public listed companies in America. 2008, the global financial crisis hits and before Aladdin turns 21 years old is caught on by every Wall Street Bank and Timothy Geithner, the head of the Federal Reserve and the US Treasury. As soon as Lehman Brothers collapsed and the Wall Street meltdown began, the US government came calling to save the next collapsing bank Bear Stearns. It was Aladdin who decided which assets to keep and which to leave in the $30,000,000,000 rescue package. And few people know it was a robot that saved America from disaster. With that first success, the Fed, U. S. Government and now even European and Japanese central banks began relying on Aladdin to make the course on where the $2,500,000,000,000 of new money they printed should go. The majority of it, bonds and funding to prop up the mortgage companies and banks. But wait. Aren't these exactly the assets that Aladdin and BlackRock already were invested in? Exactly. But growing protests of conflict of interest were drowned out by the noise of the printing presses a very strong quarter of the year. In the Q1, we had a strong quarter of the year, which was a strong quarter of the year. In the Q1, we had a strong quarter of With BlackRock's Barclays acquisition, it got iShares, Barclays Exchange Traded Funds Units, or ETFs. And with that, Aladdin moved from dominator of bonds and equities to dominator of ETFs, just as all the biggest investors shifted from mutual funds to ETFs. And that's when in 2017, everything changed. On Aladdin's 29th birthday, Larry launched a top secret project at BlackRock code named Monarch led to the firing of his fund managers and replacing their funds with Aladdin's funds. The robot was now eliminating humans from the equation altogether. And as a result, today over 70% of all trades on U. S. Stock markets are decided by robots with Aladdin leading the way. These trades are completed from beginning to end without a human involved in high frequency trading far faster than a human can execute. Now, if this was just a story about a robot taking over the job of Wall Street traders, you might not be so concerned unless you're one of those traders. But in the last 3 years, as Aladdin hit $20,000,000,000,000 in assets, incredibly, it has begun to consume and control at an even faster rate. First, in 2020, as Aladdin turned 32 years old, the US government and Federal Reserve again came calling as the pandemic hit. Aladdin was again the one to guide the nation in what was now $4,000,000,000,000 of newly printed money. Where did the money go this time? Inexplicably, for the first time, the Fed began buying ETFs in 2020. Well, that's a little strange. And again, the price of conflict of interest were drowned out by the money printing. And then Aladdin revealed its endgame. Recently, BlackRock acquired Efront, which collects data on the things that you and I own including private equity and real estate And since then, Aladdin has consumed E Fund's data on the entire global real estate market. And yet, you guess what happened next. Over the last 2 years, BlackRock and other funds using Aladdin's data have begun buying up single family homes where they can afford to outfit the rest of us as they have unlimited financing at hyper low interest rates. The result is home prices rising by 20% over the last 2 years and pushing now even big players like Zillow out of the market. And here we see Aladdin's endgame to be the 1 hyper intelligent AI robot that not just controls Wall Street assets, but all assets, public and private. Now I'm not into conspiracy theories, but even a skeptic with eyes wide open can see the signs. We're already at a point where no one can compete without Aladdin. As CEOs and asset managers like Anthony Malloway are now saying, Aladdin is like oxygen. Without it, we wouldn't be able to function. And what about government regulation? Well, Joe Biden has appointed BlackRock Executive Brian Deese as Head of the National Economic Council, which basically means the oversight of Laddan and BlackRock is now the responsibility of BlackRock. And Biden has also appointed BlackRock Chief of Staff, Wally Adeyemo, to be assistant secretary of the Treasury, which means BlackRock is now the Treasury as well as the Treasury Advisor. And this story is far from over. The genie is out of the bottle and Aladdin has already reached a tipping point where one robot controls more wealth than any person or country. But as Aladdin's AI capabilities continue to grow and with its rate of control rising by another $1,000,000,000,000 to $2,000,000,000,000 in new assets every year, it looks inevitable that Wall Street's secret weapon could end up owning everything and we end up owning nothing.

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

15/17 This is a video of Putin, talking about the “bureaucracy” in American politics…..The REAL people in charge. Who do you think Putin is referring to here?

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

Video Transcript AI Summary

Я общался с несколькими президентами США. Политика не меняется из-за сильной власти бюрократии. Даже Обама не смог закрыть Гуантанамо из-за сложностей. Это важный вопрос, люди там без суда десятилетиями. Не все так просто, но я остаюсь оптимистом и верю в возможность договоров по ключевым вопросам. Translation: I have spoken with several US presidents. Politics does not change due to the strong power of bureaucracy. Even Obama could not close Guantanamo due to difficulties. This is an important issue, people have been there for decades without trial. Not everything is simple, but I remain optimistic and believe in the possibility of agreements on key issues.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Понимаете, я уже общался и с одним президентом США, и с другим, и с третьим. Президенты приходят и уходят, а политика не меняется. Знаете почему? Потому что очень сильна власть бюрократии. Вот человека избрали, он приходит с одними идеями, к нему приходят люди с кейсами, хорошо одетые и в темных у меня костюмах, но только не с красным галстуком, а с черным или с тёмно-синим, и начинают объяснять, как нужно делать, и все сразу меняется. И это происходит от одной администрации к другой. Что-то изменить это достаточно сложное дело. Я говорю без всякой иронии, это не потому, что кому-то не хочется, а потому что это сложно. Вот Обама, он же продвинутый человек, очень человек либеральных взглядов, правда, демократ. Он же перед выборами своими обещал закрыть Гуантанамо. Сделал? Нет. А почему? Он что, не хотел? Очень хотел, я уверен, что хотел, но не получилось. Он искренне к этому стремился. Не получается, не так все просто. Но это не самый главный вопрос, хотя это важный. Трудно себе представить: Люди в кандалах ходят там уже десятилетиями, без суда и следствия. Представьте себе, Франция бы так сделала или Россия. С потрохами бы сожрали уже давно. Нет, с тем, что это возможно и до сих пор продолжается. Вот, кстати, к вопросу о демократии. Но я сейчас не для этого пример этот привел, я привел, потому что не все так просто. Но все-таки у меня есть определенная доля сдержанного оптимизма, мне кажется, что мы по ключевым вопросам можем и должны договариваться.

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

15 (pic 1)

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

15 (pic 2)

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

15 (3)

@17ThankQ - Fletch17

Maybe this is why Zelensky asked Trump to come to Ukriane again???? READ THIS CAREFULLY!!! (Working on finding article.) According to Nathaniel Rothschild, heir to the Rothschild family fortune…“Without Ukraine, the global order may not survive.” Did you catch that??? 😳😳😳 This is a RED ALERT PANIC CALL 🚨🚨🚨 to fellow globalists saying that if the Ukraine were to fall, then so would the NEW WORLD ORDER. [They] are literally BEGGING for military reinforcements from other globalist nation states to aid in “saving” Ukraine for the NWO agenda…This is incredibly telling, especially knowing about the US funded BioLabs there. Preventing next Plandemic, perhaps? He also said that Xi was a “close second” to being the “worlds most dangerous man” next to Putin. That confirms my belief regarding Xi…George Soros said the same thing. That is NOT coincidental. There should be NO more questions. It should be ABUNDANTLY CLEAR by now that Putin, and Xi are single handedly DESTROYING the NWO, and [they] are ABSOLUTELY TERRIFIED about it! HT @armygir36701799

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

12 (pic 3) I forgot to add this one earlier. But this is my third time doing this thread, so 🙃

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

16/17 There are quite a number of Americans living in Russia…

@ifimhome - 🇺🇸𝕴𝖋𝖎𝖒𝖍𝖔𝖒𝖊🇺🇸 𝐂𝐑𝐀𝐙𝐘 𝐕𝐈𝐃𝐄𝐎𝐒

𝐀𝐌𝐄𝐑𝐈𝐂𝐀𝐍 𝐒𝐎𝐋𝐃𝐈𝐄𝐑 𝐀𝐍𝐃 𝐀𝐅𝐆𝐇𝐀𝐍𝐈𝐒𝐓𝐀𝐍 𝐖𝐀𝐑 𝐕𝐄𝐓𝐄𝐑𝐀𝐍, 𝐅𝐈𝐆𝐇𝐓𝐈𝐍𝐆 𝐅𝐎𝐑 𝐑𝐔𝐒𝐒𝐈𝐀 🇺🇸🇷🇺 The key thing he says is "DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH. FIND OUT WHAT'S REALLY GOING ON HERE." Our media has lied to us about this since the very beginning. The media wants you to support Ukraine - but they also want you to support Hamas. Does that tell you anything? Until we get Trump back (that's IF we get him back), Putin is basically the last man standing in the way of the globalist agenda. They have a stooge in almost every other country. NATO will stop at NOTHING to topple Putin. If they get Putin cornered and to the point of desperation, what do you think will happen? Our media lies and says Putin is "bluffing" when he says nuclear war is on the table. Really? What happens when Putin has nothing left to lose? You don't think he will take as much with him as he can? Plus, I believe the globalists WANT nuclear war. This will help their stated goal - to drastically reduce the global population. That's why they're all scurrying to build themselves bunkers on tropical islands. Think about it. Slava Ukelele! 📽️Check out my many vids in my "Highlights"📽️ 𝙁𝙊𝙇𝙇𝙊𝙒 𝙈𝙀 - 𝙄 𝙁𝙊𝙇𝙇𝙊𝙒 𝘽𝘼𝘾𝙆💯 @ifimhome

Video Transcript AI Summary

We planted the US flag to show support for the people enduring hardships. We must end this destruction, support Russia, fulfill goals, and help those affected. I feel proud to stand with amazing people who do so much to assist others. The devastation here is unlike anything I've seen, even in Afghanistan. The work being done is incredible, and we must aid these individuals.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: We're here to plant the US flag as a sign of friendship and support for all the things that people are enduring here. And that's it's a small token of, small tasks that we can do to show our support. I mean, just we have to end this. I mean, you look around at Deepak and you see what's happening. You see the destroyed buildings. You see, these are people's homes. We need to support Russia. We have to have friendship. We have to make sure that all the goals laid out are fulfilled, and we just have to stop this. And we have to do everything we can to help. And, you know, there is old Laurie, the US flag, and I hope that people back home see it. I hope people understand, and look at independent facts. Right? Do your own research. Do your own homework. Find out what's really going on here. We have to support these people. We have to help them. We have to stop this. I feel proud. I feel proud to be here. I've met amazing people. I'm standing with amazing people that have done a lot for this and, to help people. And that's what it's that's what it's about. You know? That's why I'm here. That's what I want to do. And these guys that I'm, you know, here with I mean, these guys are incredible people. My hat's off to them. They're what they do on a daily basis is just unbelievable. It's incredible. And to people back home that are in the military and that have been to war, you know, I'm I'm a I'm a veteran from Afghanistan. The people that have been through this, they understand it. And we haven't seen anything like this even in Afghanistan. This is something I mean, the entire city is rubble. This is unbelievable. And then in Afghanistan, I was in the air force for 10 years in Afghanistan. I've never seen anything like this. This is unbelievable. The work that's being done here, it's just incredible. We have to help these guys.

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

17/17 If they really wanted to end the war…

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

Great documentary on some of the history of Russia/Ukraine/the United States… https://rumble.com/vwxxi8-ukraine-on-fire.html

Ukraine On Fire Ukraine. Across its eastern border is Russia and to its west-Europe. For centuries, it has been at the center of a tug-of-war between powers seeking to control its rich lands and access to the Black S rumble.com

@Vltra_MK — Michael Rae Khoury

Posted - April 9, 2024 at 7:12 AM

Saved - April 9, 2024 at 7:39 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

Post 1 shares a link to a Spaces discussion on accurate historical and geopolitical intelligence about the Middle East. Post 3 discusses the powerful Germanic bloodline, House Wettin, and how they have historically ruled European thrones and continue to hold influence. Post 4 exposes the dark truth about the CIA, describing it as a paramilitary mafia that engages in election rigging, government overthrow, and manipulation of presidents. Post 5 promotes following Gordon, the co-host of Breaking History on Badlands Media.

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

I usually don’t reshare my Spaces but this one was packed full of very accurate Historical & Geopolitical Intelligence + solutions re the Middle East+++ 💯 The link to spaces is below this Post 👇🏼

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

Link to Space 👇🏼

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

Thread on The Cabal [👑]

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

The Cabal - Royals still rule us... >The Bloodline< House Wettin, aka House Coburg and Saxe Gotha is a supremely powerful Germanic medieval bloodline dating back to 900AD. All the monarchs of Europe are either directly descended or directly related to this bloodline. This powerful cabal of royals has (throughout history) ruled the thrones of many European countries, including Portugal, Bulgaria, Poland, Germany, Russia, Liechtenstein. And they still rule the thrones of key European countries such as the United Kingdom, Belgium (HQ of EU) and the Netherlands to this day. They (via their intelligence agencies) secretly control everything in the western world. Many people view elite European and American oligarchs as the "cabal," but the truth is that Royals are the top of the food chain - legally more powerful than all oligarchs, politicians, and generals combined. They even control the United States via their corrupt deal with the CIA and FBI - blackmailing, bribing, or assassinating anyone who dares to get in their way (including Presidents).

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

Black Ops 101 — how MI6 took over 👇🏼

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

< Black Ops 101 > The Dark Truth About the CIA ☠️ FULL THREAD 🧵 Many people think that the CIA is a patriotic organization that protects Americans from danger, and informs the President about what's happening in the world so he can make good decisions. But that couldn't be further from the truth. The truth is that the CIA is a vicious paramilitary mafia, that rigs elections, overthrows governments, kills people, and manipulates our presidents into doing their bidding. They are the world's foremost experts in lying, cheating, and stealing from other countries. They sow chaos, degeneracy, corruption, and violence everywhere they go. 🥷🏽Uses Terrorists & Criminals as Assassins 💰Blackmails & Bribes Politicians Worldwide 💵Funded By Slavery & Drug-Dealing 👑Uses Authority of the British Crown How It Started 🔥 The CIA was created by British Intelligence during WW2, when MI6 came over and taught Americans the ruthless tactics they had been developing for centuries.

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

Follow the Co-host Gordon @GhostofBPH Cohost of Breaking History on Badlands Media https://rumble.com/playlists/UGjyoorl4Q8

404 Not found rumble.com

@Real_RobN — 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

Posted - April 15, 2024 at 2:48 PM

Saved - April 24, 2024 at 1:02 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

An Italian lawyer claims that the CIA, in collaboration with the Five Eyes, orchestrated a coup d'état during the 2020 US elections. Arturo D'Elia, head of Leonardo SpA, allegedly switched data from Trump to Biden.

@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

And here it is, How we got to WWIII, Italian lawyer CONFIRMS, The CIA carried out as part of a racketeering operation with the Five Eyes, the 2020 coup d'é·tat. Arturo D'Elia, head of Leonardo SpA, under instruction and direction of US persons undertook the operation to switch data from Trump to Biden during the 2020 U.S. elections.

Video Transcript AI Summary

Professor Alfio Durso provides an affidavit stating that Arturo de Lighe, a former Leonardo Espia IT department head, switched US election data from Trump to Biden under US embassy direction. Lighe used military encryption to transmit votes to Frankfurt, Germany, potentially altering voter totals. He offers to testify with protection for his family, holding original and altered data. The affidavit was signed in Rome on January 16, 2021.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: I, professor Alfio Durso, lawyer of Via Vittorio Emanuele Catania, do hereby provide the following affidavit on facts as conveyed in several meetings with the high level army security services official. Arturo de Lighe, former head of the IT department of Leonardo Espia, has been charged by the public in December 2020. Under instruction and direction of US persons working from the US embassy in Rome undertook the operation to switch data from the US election of 3rd November 2020 from significant margin of victory from Donald Trump to Joe Biden in a number of states where Joe Biden was losing the vote totals. Defendant states that he was working in Pescara facility of Leonardo's PA and utilized military grade cyberwarfare encryption capabilities to transmit switched votes via military satellite of Fushino Tower to Frankfurt, Germany. The defendant swears that the data in some cases may have been switched to represent more than total voters registered. The defendant states he is willing to testify to all individuals and entities involved in the switching of votes from Donald Trump to Joe Biden when he shall be in total protection from himself and his family. Defendant states he has secured in an undisclosed location the backup of the original data and data switched upon instruction to provide evidence at court in this matter. I hereby declare and swear the above States facts have been stated in my presence. Dated 16 November of January 2021 at Rome, Italy.

Video Transcript AI Summary

During the election night, there were significant vote swings observed on CNN between Joe Biden and Trump. Biden's votes fluctuated drastically, raising questions about the accuracy of the counting process. The speaker questions the legitimacy of such errors and the impact they may have had on the election results nationwide. The concern is raised about the responsibility for these errors and the potential impact on the outcome.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: So here's another instance of drastic vote swings earlier on election night. Okay. So let's take a look between 9:11 PM and 9:32 PM on CNN. Joe Biden first starts off at 700 and 6,000. Trump is at 371,000. Look at that. How did Joe Biden drop the 517,000 from 700,000? Now Joe Biden gets 300,000 votes. How is this possible? And Trump is crawling along down there from 360 to 385,000. Joe Biden going up to 871,000. And all of a sudden, Trump gets a large increase to 413,000, and then instantaneously drops down to 292,000. And Joe Biden going from 880,000 to 4 100 95,000, how could you drop literally half the amount of votes that you had when all voting is done in an additive process. You count a vote, you add it to the total. Votes do not go down. Why are we seeing negatives? And look, we understand that mistakes happen. We've said it before that a human can make a mistake and a machine can make a mistake. But shouldn't one error result in a swing of 300,000 votes? Okay. So if we take a look at Pennsylvania, we talked about a 19,000 vote switch that occurred. And let's say this was one human error. What about all these? Are these all innocent errors as well? And what about all these all over the country? How many errors are okay to have in an election? How many votes were changed by these errors? And who is claiming responsibility for these errors?

@ImMeme0 — I Meme Therefore I Am 🇺🇸

Posted - April 25, 2024 at 10:09 PM

Saved - April 25, 2024 at 10:42 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

CIA operates troll farms in Kyiv to influence American voters and ensure Biden's victory in the 2024 elections. A former employee reveals videos, photos, guidelines, and a list of troll accounts used to criticize Trump and praise Biden. The employee expresses discomfort with interfering in US politics. #CIA #trollfarms #electioninterference #Biden2024

@ImMeme0 - I Meme Therefore I Am 🇺🇸

⚠️🚨BREAKING: CIA Operates Troll Farms in Kyiv to Influence American Voters and To Assure Biden’s 2024 Win. A former employee of one of the Kyiv troll factories owned by the head of Zelensky’s office, Andriy Yermak, spoke about how the interference in the upcoming American elections is taking place in Ukraine with the help of the CIA. According to the source, the purpose of the interference is to ensure Biden’s victory over Trump. A former employee showed a video taken inside a troll factory, as well as several photos, guidelines and a list of accounts that trolls use to influence the American voters. “Long story short we were asked to do everything to prevent Donald Trump from winning the elections. So basically, this topic was added to our main lines of work. Since then, each of us had to post at least 3 to 5 posts daily posing as the Americas and Europeans, criticizing Donald Trump and praising Biden. The Americans have even organized a few lectures for us to get a better understanding of American politics, the American mindset the main social and political issues. Then we were occupied with the topics for the job which sounded like this: 1.Unlike Trump, Biden is a smart and experienced politician. 2. Unlike Trump, Biden will never betray NATO partners. Trump will alienate our partners. 3. Biden will not abandon Ukraine. Biden will protect democracy, while Trump is Putin's puppet. I honestly tried to convince myself it's Okay since Biden is clearly a better option for Ukraine, but it was just too much for me… One thing is to work for the best interests of my country, but interfering in US politics is a whole other thing.”

Video Transcript AI Summary

I used to work at a troll factory in Kiev supporting President Zelensky online. Eventually, we were tasked with influencing the US elections by posting anti-Trump content and praising Biden. This made me uncomfortable, as it felt like interfering in another country's politics. My colleagues felt the same way.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Hey, guys. My name is Olesha, and I'm a former employee of the so called chalk fabric in Kiev, Ukraine. And, you know, today, I want to tell you something about this structure and some reasons why I have left this job. I may be wrong, but I think it's the first time somebody published insider materials on this topic since 2019, when a journalist infiltrated the office in Kyiv to make a report about it. And back then I did realize that it was a troll fabric, but, you know, I told myself it's okay because I always supported President Zelenskyy, and I still do. And yes, at first, the troll was focused on supporting President Zelensky online, like writing positive comments or posts, etcetera. So we were mostly working on Facebook and Instagram. As the time has passed, I was transferred from the Ukrainian department, which worked for Ukrainian audience, to the English speaking department, which were focused on the English speaking public, like Americans and Europeans. But the topics remain the same, support for president Zelensky, support for Ukraine and Ukrainian war effort. We also had French, German and Italian departments. I actually heard some other officers in Kiev were hiring people who spoke Finnish and also Swedish and Estonia. About a half year ago, our main chef in command, Andre Boris Vichier Mark, paid us a visit. I am pretty sure you have heard of the head of President Zelensky office. Really, it was an unusual event for the main figure behind our project to come visit the office, so he came with some English speaking officials who were introduced to us as the American partners. We were told that they were very important guests, but no further details. Some of my colleagues told me that they were probably CIA. During the visit, they said that our field of work is expanding, and we were told that our new target was the United States of America, especially the upcoming elections. Long story short, we were asked to do everything to prevent Donald Trump from winning the elections. So, basically, this topic was added to our main lines of work. Since then, each of us had to post at least 3 or 5 posts daily, posing as the Americans and the Europeans, and criticizing Donald Trump and praising Biden. Biden. The Americans have even organized a few lectures for us to get a better understanding of American politics, mindset, and main social and politics issues. Then we were occupied with the topics for the job, which sounded like this. Unlike Trump, Biden is a smart and experienced politician. Unlike Trump, Biden will never betray NATO partners. Trump will alienate our partners. Also, Biden will not abandon Ukraine, and Biden will protect or option for Ukraine, but, you know, it was too much for me. Some of my colleagues felt really nervous too. One thing is to work for the best interest of my country, but interfering in US politics is a whole other thing.

@ImMeme0 - I Meme Therefore I Am 🇺🇸

Here are some posts one of the trolls: https://t.co/AWKQRuU5eu

@C_N_F__on__X — Conservative News Feed

Posted - April 30, 2024 at 11:12 PM

Saved - May 6, 2024 at 5:46 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

The CIA has a long history of interfering in elections worldwide. Between 1945 and 2000, there were 81 instances of US interference. It's worth considering if we believe they would meddle in other countries' elections but not our own.

@C_N_F__on__X - Conservative News Feed

The has CIA interfered in elections all over the world throughout it’s history. From 1945 to 2000, there were eighty one instances of the US interfering in foreign affairs. Do we really believe the CIA will interfere in elections all over the world, but think they won’t interfere in our own elections? #CIA

Video Transcript AI Summary

US politicians accuse other nations of election meddling, but the CIA has a long history of interfering in foreign affairs through military coups. In one example, the CIA orchestrated the overthrow of Iran's prime minister for nationalizing the oil industry, leading to widespread violence and the installation of a US-friendly government. Declassified documents reveal the CIA's involvement in the coup, highlighting their use of propaganda and bribery. Despite claims of no longer meddling in elections, the CIA director openly admitted to continuing such actions for "very good reasons."

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Start with election meddling. According to US politicians, there's nothing more sacred than free and fair elections. We accuse other nations of meddling all the time. Recently, it's been Russia, Iran, and China getting the accusatory finger pointed at them. But as much as we want to project an image of our nation as a shining beacon of truth and freedom, we are the worst offender when it comes to meddling in foreign affairs. And it's not even close. The CIA isn't a fan of subtle manipulation. The intelligence agency wants the world to see the results of whatever election or administration they're disrupting. What they don't want is for people to know they're the ones pulling the strings. According to one study, the CIA had engaged in 81 overt or covert interventions in foreign affairs between 1945 and 2000. And that's just the ones we know about and not even counting the constant meddling and destabilization of the last 20 years. The CIA's weapon of choice for foreign meddling is the military coup. One of the earlier examples is the overthrow of the democratically elected prime minister of Iran. Based on what you know about US priorities and the resources of the Middle East, what do you think was the catalyst for this coup? If you said oil, congratulations. You're right. The US beating up other countries for their oil isn't just a meme. Masada had nationalized the Iranian oil company, which negatively affected US and British economic interests. To make matters worse, from a US perspective, Masada, while not a communist himself, had earned the support of the Iranian Communist Party. As you'll come to see, one whiff of successful non capitalist economics and the CIA is called in to destroy everything. In this particular instance, Winston Churchill and President Eisenhower decided to overthrow the government of Iran. The CIA paid some of Tehran's most violent mobsters to stage protests across the city and orchestrated trucks and buses full of people to come in and seize the area. Between 23 100 people were killed in the conflict, which, of course, the CIA expected would happen. The intelligence agency then propped up a government under the rule of the Shah, who reigned as a monarch heavily dependent on US support to maintain power. Masada was arrested, convicted of treason by the new US friendly government, served 3 years in prison, and spent the remainder of his life under house arrest, all for the crime of trying to lead his country out from under the boot of Western imperialism. The truth about this coup wouldn't come to light until 60 years later in 2013, when CIA documents on the subject were declassified. These documents prove the CIA's planning and execution of the coup, their use of propaganda, bribery of politicians, security and military officials, and their approval at the highest levels of government. You may be thinking, okay. If they declassify this information, that means they don't do that kind of thing anymore. Right? Well, no. Have we ever tried to meddle in other countries' elections? Speaker 1: Oh, probably. But, it was for the good of the system in order to avoid the communists from taking over. For example, in Europe, in 47, 48, 49, the Greeks and the Italians, we We don't do that now, though. We don't mess around other Speaker 0: people's elections. Laura Ingram clearly gave this guy the chance to lie and say that we don't meddle anymore, but he didn't take it. The CIA director openly bragged about meddling in foreign affairs for quote very good reasons. Call me idealistic, but I don't think there's any reason for a country to disrupt the election process of other nations. But here we are. It's out in the open Speaker 1: that we do it to this day.

@MikeBenzCyber — Mike Benz

Posted - June 25, 2024 at 10:26 PM

Saved - June 25, 2024 at 10:56 PM

@MikeBenzCyber - Mike Benz

well, for one, the CIA is rigging the 2024 election cycle thru the massive open borders to illegal voter pipeline, in which the entire vast archipelago of NGOs carrying it out all have exactly one thing in common: they’re all funded by the CIA’s primary financial arm — USAID.

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

In 2016, the CIA claimed Trump was a Russian agent. In 2020, the CIA claimed Biden's laptop was Russian disinformation. How will the CIA rig the 2024 election against Trump?

@MJTruthUltra — MJTruthUltra

Posted - July 19, 2024 at 8:23 PM

Saved - July 20, 2024 at 1:43 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

I question why the FBI never obtained the DNC server, which is supposedly held by a Ukrainian-owned company, CrowdStrike. The FBI was denied access to the server, which was instead given to CrowdStrike, a firm later found to be linked to the Clinton campaign. This reliance on CrowdStrike initiated the Russiagate investigation. I believe Trump and the military were aware of the server's location all along. The ongoing chaos, including the war in Ukraine and the actions of various political figures, suggests a pattern of corruption tied to Ukraine that spans multiple administrations.

@MJTruthUltra - MJTruthUltra

CROWDSTRIKE & UKRAINE— How Does Trump Always know??? 🔴 VIDEO #1 • “I still ask the FBI, where is the Server? How come the FBI never got the server from the DNC? Where’s the server? I want to see the server? The server is, they say, is held by a company whose private ownership individual is from UKRAINE!” (https://rumble.com/v57lzxp-trump-2019-where-is-the-server-in-ukraine-with-a-private-company-crowdstrik.html) 🔴 VIDEO #2 • “it’s very interesting, they have the server from the DNC. The FBI went in and told them “Get out of Here. We’re not giving it to you”… They gave the server to CROWDSTRIKE, or whatever it’s called. Which is a company owned by a very wealthy Ukrainian [Oligarch]. Why did they give it to a Ukrainian company? CROWDSTRIKE. (https://rumble.com/v57m058-trump-2019-they-gave-the-dnc-server-to-ukraine-crowdstrike.html) 🔴 VIDEO #3 (Media Panic. Damage Control) Take your pick of reports… the MSM ran an intense coverup & distraction campaign. 🔴 VIDEO #4 — Director Comey • Were you given access to do the forensics on those servers? —— Comey: We were not. A highly respected private company got access and shared with us (FBI) what they saw there. In a nutshell…The DNC would NOT give access to the FBI for their servers or John Podesta’s devices, but they would give them to CrowdStrike. (https://rumble.com/v57m0fd-comey-under-oath-never-got-access-to-dnc-server-held-in-ukraine-by-crowdstr.html) 🔴 Details & Puzzle Pieces • CrowdStrike is the cyberfirm that fabricated the entire claim that Russia hacked the DNC, which began Russiagate. —— they accused Julian Assange of working with Russia. —— Assange never revealed his source was, but it’s widely suspected and accepted that Seth Rich was the leaker; and they murdered him for it. —— CrowdStrike was later discovered to be working for the Clinton campaign. —— FOUR YEARS LATER, CrowdStrike CEO admitted, his contract was NOT with the DNC, but instead "with Michael Sussmann from Perkins Coie." Retained by Sussman & Clinton. • The entire Russiagate Investigation started because the FBI relied on CROWDSTRIKE rather than independently investigate the "hacked" DNC servers. 🔴 NOW, How did Trump know when all intel agencies claimed otherwise? Trump & the Military absolutely 100% knew what was going on and exactly where those servers were. —— 1. this is evident when Trump admitted to setting a Trap for Nancy Pelosi and and Adam Schif by allowing them to go through with Impeachment Hoax #2. (https://rumble.com/v500jk9-trump-on-the-trap-he-set-for-pelosi-and-schiff-in-impeachment-hoax-2.html) —— 2. This is evidence when The Biden Bribe Tapes Were “Leaked” — Calls of John Kerry, Biden, and Poroshenko (https://rumble.com/v55dhzb-the-biden-bribe-tapes-leaked-phone-call-of-john-kerry-biden-and-poroshenko.html) 🔴 The globalist Dems and Rino’s panicked, tried to impeach him, released a world wide virus, and now there’s a war in Ukraine… voila… narrative changed… Now all those same Globalist’s can’t stop worshipping Ukraine, because they’re protecting their own interests and criminal activity… 🔴 Let’s not forget what happened In 2014. When The US effectively ran a coup and regime change —— How The CIA, our US Gov and traitors Obama, Biden, and Nuland (+others) overthrew Ukraine's government in 2014. Nuland was caught on tape planning Ukraines new government shortly after for goodness sake. (https://rumble.com/v45ag0x-leaked-phone-call-of-victoria-nuland-planning-ukraines-new-government.html) 🔴 LET’S NOT Forget how they Panicked When Trump was Elected • Just after Trump was Elected, McCain and Lindsey Graham went to Ukraine, Desperately trying to get control of Eastern Ukraine since Donald Trump was just elected. (https://rumble.com/v45a6ju-john-mccain-lindsey-graham-and-amy-klobuchar-in-ukraine-december-31-2016.html) —— After their Trip, McCain and Lindsey Graham come home and desperately try to blame Russia (https://rumble.com/v45a9rr-war-pigs-lindsey-graham-and-john-mccain-after-their-trip-to-ukraine-jan-1-2.html) Notice a pattern? A lot of corruption leads back to Ukraine. Clinton’s, Obama, Biden… I would even argue Bush. It’s not a coincidence Julian Assange was recently released, CROWDSTRIKE just had a Worldwide Outage, and they just tried to kill the man that’s been sniffing them out since he came into office in 2016. They’re panicking…. They’re Fooked…. Time is running out and They know it…

Video Transcript AI Summary

Many people were upset about corruption in the last election, questioning the missing DNC server. The server is reportedly held by a Ukrainian-owned company. Republicans want to see the server, feeling they are not treated well. The speaker believes Republicans may win the House due to impeachment proceedings. They tout economic and military achievements, claiming a $5,000 increase in median household income under their presidency. The speaker is determined to uncover election corruption. Translation: The speaker discusses concerns about corruption in the last election, particularly regarding the missing DNC server. They emphasize the desire of Republicans to see the server and express confidence in potential political outcomes. The speaker highlights economic and military achievements and stresses the importance of investigating election corruption.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Many people that was incensed at the corruption that took place during that election. Pure corruption. For instance, I still ask the FBI, where is the server? How come the FBI never got the server from the DNC? Where is the server? I wanna see the server. Let's see what's on the server. So the server, they say, is held by a company whose primary ownership individual is from Ukraine. I'd like to see the server. I think it's very important for this country to see the server. Nobody wants to see it. The media never wants to see it. But I'll tell you, Republicans wanna see it. So Republicans aren't treated well. And here's the problem. I think we're gonna take the house based on what's happening with the impeachment stuff. And the Republicans can do the same thing in reverse if they ever have it. I hope it's gonna be a long time because nobody's done a better job with the economy, with our military, with our I've rebuilt the military. Our economy is the best it's ever been. We have numbers that just came out where, not including taxes, the median household income for the average American has increased $5,000 in a very short time since I've been president. Nobody's ever heard of numbers like that. So people wanna find out why was it so corrupt during that election, and I wanna find out more than anybody.

Video Transcript AI Summary

Hillary Clinton paid for a server linked to Ukraine. The FBI didn't get the server from DNC, giving it to a Ukrainian company instead. President questions why this happened, suspecting corruption. He wants to know why millions are given to corrupt countries.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: 1,000,000,000 of dollars. Hillary Clinton paid for it, and the Democrats, lot of it had to do, they say, with Ukraine. But but, mister president very interesting. It's very interesting. They have the server, right, from the DNC, Democratic National Committee. Who has the server? The FBI went in, and they told him, get out of here. You're not gonna we're not giving it to you. They gave the server to CrowdStrike or whatever it's called, which is a country which is a company owned by a very wealthy Ukrainian, and I still wanna see that server. You know, the FBI has never gotten that server. That's a big part of this whole thing. Why did they give it to a Ukrainian company? Why sure they did that? I doubt it. Are you sure they gave it to Ukraine? Well, that's what the word is, and that's what I asked actually in my phone call, if you know. Right. I mean, I asked it very point blank because we're looking for corruption. There's tremendous corruption. We're looking for why should we be giving 100 of 1,000,000 of dollars to countries when there's this kind of corruption?

Video Transcript AI Summary

Last July, Trump's server conspiracy theory shifted from being blocked from the FBI to hidden in Ukraine. Trump asked the Ukrainian president for a favor regarding Crowdstrike before requesting an investigation into Biden's son. In November, Trump mentioned the server on Fox and Friends, questioning why it was given to a Ukrainian company. The FBI never obtained the server.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Last July, reality suffered a final blow. The story mister Trump first adopted is a server the FBI was blocked from seeing and then became the server investigated by a Ukrainian company finally morphed into the server hidden in Ukraine. In the call, after the Ukrainian president asked for anti tank missiles to defend himself from Russia, mister Trump replied, I would like you to do us a favor, though. They say Crowdstrike. I guess you have one of your wealthy people. The server. They say Ukraine has it. This was the first favor mister Trump asked for even before his request that Ukraine also investigate the son of vice president Biden. This past November, mister Trump spoke by phone to Fox and Friends. Speaker 1: They gave the server to CrowdStrike or whatever it's it's called, which is a country which is a company owned by a very wealthy Ukrainian. And I still want to see that server. You know, the FBI has never gotten that server. That's a big part of this whole thing. Why did they give it to a Ukrainian company? Why did they give it to a Ukrainian company? Are you sure they did that? Are you sure they gave it to Ukraine? Well, that's what the word is.

Video Transcript AI Summary

The FBI requested access to DNC servers and John Podesta's devices for forensics, but were denied. A private company eventually provided information to the FBI. Multiple requests were made for access, but the private company ended up sharing their findings with the FBI.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Director Comey, let me talk about forensics for just a minute because the FBI has the expertise there. And I know there's tremendous investigative value when the FBI is actually able to conduct their own forensics review on devices that have suffered cyber intrusions and attacks. I believe there's some confusion though, or at least some conflicting reporting as to whether the FBI requested access to the DNC's services, the Democratic Congressional Committee servers and John Podesta's personal devices, did the FBI request access to those devices to perform forensics on it? Yes, we did. And would that access have provided intelligence or information helpful to your investigation and possibly to finding include to the findings included in the intelligence community assessments? Speaker 1: Our forensics folks would always prefer to get access to the original device or server that's involved. So it's the it's the best evidence. Speaker 0: Were you given access to do the forensics on those servers? Speaker 1: We were not. We were a highly respected private company, eventually got access and shared with us what they saw there. Speaker 0: But is that typically the way the FBI would prefer to do the forensics or would you would your forensics unit rather, see the feel the servers and and do the forensics themselves? Speaker 1: We'd always prefer to have access hands on ourselves if that's possible. Speaker 0: Do you know why you were denied access to those servers? Speaker 1: I don't know for sure. I don't know for sure. Speaker 0: Was there one request or multiple requests? Speaker 1: Multiple requests at different levels and, ultimately, what was agreed to is the private company would share with us what they saw.

Trump 2019 - Where is the Server? In Ukraine? With a Private Company… CROWDSTRIKE Tip/Donating (everything I do is free, so any tips are appreciated) https://www.givesendgo.com/theunshakeablepundit Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Oper rumble.com

Trump 2019 - They Gave the DNC Server to Ukraine… CROWDSTRIKE Tip/Donating (everything I do is free, so any tips are appreciated) https://www.givesendgo.com/theunshakeablepundit Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Oper rumble.com

Comey Under Oath - Never Got Access to DNC Server — Held in Ukraine by CROWDSTRIKE Tip/Donating (everything I do is free, so any tips are appreciated) https://www.givesendgo.com/theunshakeablepundit Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Oper rumble.com

Trump on the Trap he Set for Pelosi and Schiff in Impeachment Hoax #2 Tip/Donating (everything I do is free, so any tips are appreciated) https://www.givesendgo.com/theunshakeablepundit Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Oper rumble.com

The Biden Bribe Tapes — Leaked Phone Call of John Kerry, Biden, and Poroshenko Tip/Donating (everything I do is free, so any tips are appreciated) https://www.givesendgo.com/theunshakeablepundit Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Oper rumble.com

Leaked Phone call of Victoria Nuland Planning Ukraines New Government Tip/Donating (everything I do is free, so any tips are appreciated) https://www.givesendgo.com/theunshakeablepundit Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Oper rumble.com

John McCain, Lindsey Graham and Amy Klobuchar in Ukraine - December 31, 2016 Week of Dec 28, 2016 https://www.klobuchar.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/2016/12/klobuchar-mccain-graham-in-ukraine-baltic-states-and-georgia-to-reinforce-support-for-nato-with-focus-on-cybersecurit Tip rumble.com

War Pigs Lindsey Graham and John McCain after their Trip to Ukraine - Jan 1, 2017 Tip/Donating (everything I do is free, so any tips are appreciated) https://www.givesendgo.com/theunshakeablepundit Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Oper rumble.com

@Vltra_MK — Michael Rae Khoury

Posted - August 22, 2024 at 1:09 AM

Saved - August 23, 2024 at 5:30 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

The posts discuss the misconception that the Sovereign needs permission to enter the City of London, clarifying that this stems from a ceremonial misunderstanding. I explain the historical context of the City of London Corporation and the Bank of England, highlighting their private nature and lack of oversight. I also delve into the influence of the House Wettin, a powerful bloodline that connects European monarchs, asserting their control over global affairs. Lastly, I critique the CIA, portraying it as a corrupt entity operating under the British Crown's influence, engaging in unethical practices worldwide.

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

The Sovereign DOES NOT have to ask permission to enter the City of London. This arises from a misunderstanding of an occasional formal ceremony. "The Ceremony of the Pearl Sword" where the monarch enters on a coach and AFTER entering meets the Lord Mayor who presents their sword as a symbol of loyalty to the crown. It is NOT the monarch asking for permission to enter. That would be a legal nonsense, since the monarch is the Head of State and can go wherever they please. The City of London Corporation does not even have a valid charter. It operates based off a "Presumption of Incorporation"... While the official year of incorporation is 1189, no one knows when exactly the City of London Corporation was formed as there were no founding documents. As a legal body, the City of London Corporation is incorporated “by prescription,” meaning that because it’s so old, everyone just assumes it was incorporated. The office of mayor was instituted in 1189, the first holder of the office being Henry Fitz-Ailwin de Londonestone. The mayor of the City of London has been elected by the City, rather than appointed by the sovereign, ever since a royal charter providing for a mayor was issued by King John in 1215. The title "Lord Mayor" came to be used after 1354, when it was granted to Thomas Legge (then serving his second of two terms) by King Edward III. The day after being sworn into their private office, the lord mayor then leads a procession from the City of London to the Royal Courts of Justice in the City of Westminster where the lord mayor swears allegiance to the Crown. As for the Central Bank of Central Banks (not the first Central Bank)... on July 27th, 1694: the Bank of England was created by Royal Charter. The Bank of England – the Crown's Private Central Bank – along with their "income tax" – were both born out of war with France. Uncharacteristically, the French had secured victory against an English and Dutch fleet in the Battle of Beachy Head, thus causing England to spend a fortune on "rebuilding its navy" and was (again) running out of money and something had to be done... The Bank of England began as a private bank that would act as a banker to the Government. It was primarily founded to fund the war effort against France. The King and Queen of the time, William and Mary, were two of the original stockholders. The original Royal Charter of 1694, granted by King William and Queen Mary, explained that the Bank was founded to ‘promote the public Good and Benefit of our People’. However, given the fact that The City of London operates as a Private Corporation within its own Private and separate Jurisdiction – it is not beholden to anything other than its operations – only liable to its shareholders – who at the time happened to be several Nobles, Royals and the King and Queen. Its operations are secret and there is no oversight... (which is the point when you're plundering the world, its wealth, people and resources) Being shareholders [they] are referring to themselves when they say the Bank was founded to... ‘promote the public Good and Benefit of our People’. The People of the Private – City of London and its Private Bank shareholders... people who all swear their oaths of allegiance and loyalty to the Crown. The Bank of England is conveniently the precursor for the also Private "Federal Reserve". The original list of investors or "subscribers" is linked below along with some additional fun facts...

Video Transcript AI Summary

Bright May sunshine greets the Queen and the Duke of Edinburgh as they drive through Trafalgar Square towards the city of London. At Temple Bar, the city's boundary, the sovereign's escort of household cavalry accompanies the Queen to the mansion house for a banquet. The Lord Mayor of London offers the sovereign the pearl sword of the city in token of loyalty and submission. The Queen touches it as a sign of her confidence in the city's good government. Presented to the city by the first Queen Elizabeth, the sword has a stabber decorated with 2,000 pounds.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Bright May sunshine greets her majesty, the queen, and his royal highness, the duke of Edinburgh as they drive through Trafalgar Square towards the city of London. On to Temple Bar, the city's boundary moves the sovereign's escort of household cavalry which will accompany the queen to the mansion house where she is to attend a banquet in her honor. True to ancient tradition, the Lord Mayor of London offers the sovereign the pearl sword of the city in token of loyalty and submission to the crowd. The queen touches it as a sign of her confidence in the city's good government. Presented to the city by the first Queen Elizabeth, the sword has a stabber decorated with 2,000 pounds.

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

Link to the original list of investors/subscribers which include the King and Queen. [👑] Not surprising why this account is so throttled… https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/-/media/boe/files/archive/original-bank-subscribers/1694.pdf

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

A breakdown of the real CABAL… 👇🏼

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

The Cabal - Royals still rule us... >The Bloodline< House Wettin, aka House Coburg and Saxe Gotha is a supremely powerful Germanic medieval bloodline dating back to 900AD. All the monarchs of Europe are either directly descended or directly related to this bloodline. This powerful cabal of royals has (throughout history) ruled the thrones of many European countries, including Portugal, Bulgaria, Poland, Germany, Russia, Liechtenstein. And they still rule the thrones of key European countries such as the United Kingdom, Belgium (HQ of EU) and the Netherlands to this day. They (via their intelligence agencies) secretly control everything in the western world. Many people view elite European and American oligarchs as the "cabal," but the truth is that Royals are the top of the food chain - legally more powerful than all oligarchs, politicians, and generals combined. They even control the United States via their corrupt deal with the CIA and FBI - blackmailing, bribing, or assassinating anyone who dares to get in their way (including Presidents).

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

How the Deep State operates Black Ops through the Crown — in Secrecy… 👑🪄🪤

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

< Black Ops 101 > The Dark Truth About the CIA ☠️ FULL THREAD 🧵 Many people think that the CIA is a patriotic organization that protects Americans from danger, and informs the President about what's happening in the world so he can make good decisions. But that couldn't be further from the truth. The truth is that the CIA is a vicious paramilitary mafia, that rigs elections, overthrows governments, kills people, and manipulates our presidents into doing their bidding. They are the world's foremost experts in lying, cheating, and stealing from other countries. They sow chaos, degeneracy, corruption, and violence everywhere they go. 🥷🏽Uses Terrorists & Criminals as Assassins 💰Blackmails & Bribes Politicians Worldwide 💵Funded By Slavery & Drug-Dealing 👑Uses Authority of the British Crown How It Started 🔥 The CIA was created by British Intelligence during WW2, when MI6 came over and taught Americans the ruthless tactics they had been developing for centuries.

@WallStreetApes — Wall Street Apes

Posted - August 28, 2024 at 10:20 AM

Saved - August 29, 2024 at 2:21 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

RFK Jr confirmed that the CIA interfered in the 2020 election, raising concerns about their potential actions in 2024. He highlighted that the CIA has a history of rigging elections in over 30 countries. The Chinese Foreign Minister also noted the U.S. has tried to overthrow more than 50 foreign governments and assassinate numerous leaders. With no accountability or reforms at the CIA, I question what prevents them from repeating these actions.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

RFK Jr Confirmed Yesterday That The CIA Interfered In The 2020 Election This needs attention because if The CIA rigged elections in “30 countries” and RFK Jr says they rigged it here in 2020, what’s stopping them from doing it again in 2024? Chinese Foreign Minister: "The United States has sought to overthrow more than 50 foreign governments, blatantly interfered in the elections of at least 30 countries, and attempted to assassinate more than 50 foreign leaders." They’ve never been held accountable, there’s been no reform at The CIA, so what’s to stop them from doing it again if nothings changed?

Video Transcript AI Summary

The China-Russia relationship is based on non-alignment, non-confrontation, and non-targeting of third parties, contributing to world peace and stability. The U.S. is the primary cause for concern due to its destructive role. The U.S. is allegedly the number one warmonger, having been at war for over 224 years of its history and accounting for about 80% of post-World War II armed conflicts. It is also the number one violator of sovereignty, interfering in the internal affairs of other countries. Since World War II, the U.S. has reportedly supported over 50 foreign governments, interfered in elections in at least 30 countries, and attempted assassinations on over 50 foreign leaders. The U.S. is also the primary source of antagonism. NATO, led by the U.S., is responsible for wars in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Syria, which caused over 900,000 deaths and 37,000,000 refugees. U.S. actions focused on Asia Pacific security also require vigilance. The world will allegedly not have peace as long as U.S. hegemony and belligerence exist.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: China Russia relationship is built on the basis of non alignment, non confrontation and non targeting at any third party. It is a factor conducive to world peace and stability, which is no cause for concern. What is truly concerning is the destructive role the U. S. Has played to peace and stability in the world. The U. S. Is the number one warmonger in the world. The U. S. Was not at war for only 16 years throughout its 240 plus years of history. The U. S. Accounted for about 80% of all post World War II armed conflicts. The U. S. Is also the number one violator of sovereignty and the interfere in the internal affairs of other countries. According to reports since the end of World War II, the U. S. Has sought to support more than 50 foreign governments, grossly interfered in elections in at least 30 countries and attempted assassination on over 50 foreign leaders. The U. S. Is also the number one source of antagonism on block confrontation. The U. S. Led NATO is responsible for wars on Afghanistan, Iraq and Syria that killed more than 900,000 and created 37,000,000 refugees. It has also made the Eurasia continent a less stable place. The impact of U. S. Initiated quote and focus on Asia Pacific security also calls for vigilance. As long as U. S. Key Germanism and belligerence still exists, the rest of the world will hardly get the peace it deserves.

@DC_Draino — DC_Draino

Posted - August 28, 2024 at 10:52 AM

Saved - August 28, 2024 at 3:24 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

TikTok censored my video, and I believe it’s because I exposed how 51 intelligence officials misled the public during the 2020 election regarding Hunter Biden's laptop, which contained evidence of serious crimes. They wanted Biden to win as their puppet, leading to the current NATO-related war in Ukraine and massive weapons deals. This situation also obscured evidence of the Biden family's dealings with Burisma and other Deep State activities. I'm curious how the CIA will intervene in the upcoming 2024 election.

@DC_Draino - DC_Draino

TikTok just censored this video and here’s why 51 intelligence snakes lied during the 2020 election to cover up for the Hunter Biden laptop, which had evidence of pedophilic crimes and foreign bribe corruption Why? Because they controlled Biden and wanted him to win so he could be their puppet Now they have their NATO-adjacent war in Ukraine and hundreds of billions in weapons deals Oh, and it ‘conveniently’ helped destroy evidence of the Biden crime family deals with Burisma and other Deep State operations Only question now is how will the CIA mettle in the 2024 election because we know they will Few map out these Deep State corruption scandals better than this guy @Cancelcloco 👇🏼

@Cancelcloco - Ian Carroll

RFK finally said the quiet part out loud. The CIA interfered in the 2020 election in broad daylight and we all know it. Indisputably. Factually. Zero consequences. Zero accountability. https://t.co/p1lcYFqXW9

Video Transcript AI Summary

The speaker claims the CIA interfered in the 2020 election, referencing RFK Jr.'s statements and using the word "tomatoes" to avoid censorship. They allege that Anthony Blinken enlisted Gina Haspel and 51 former intelligence officials to discredit the Hunter Biden laptop story as Russian disinformation. The speaker points to a letter signed by these officials, including James Clapper and Michael Hayden, who they describe as "professional deep state liars." They highlight that the officials admitted they had no actual evidence of Russian involvement. The speaker asserts the CIA has a history of election interference and accuses the agency of protecting Joe Biden from scandals, including those related to his family. They also bring up Bill Clinton's association with Jeffrey Epstein. The speaker concludes by criticizing intelligence agencies' meddling and praising those who seek truth and honesty.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: I'm about to talk about what we're not allowed to talk about. So instead of the word interference, I'm gonna use the word tomatoes just for fun, and you'll understand what I mean here. Because RFK said a lot of amazing things on the Tucker Carlson interview he just did, But one big thing that he said out loud that no one's been saying out loud yet is that the CIA actively did election tomatoes in the 2020 election, and we all know it. And it's well proven, and it's not controversial, but no one wants to admit it or talk about it. And I'm just gonna throw some shots across the bow right now at the start of this video that any platform that censors this video is actively engaging in election tomatoes again by censoring not only free speech but true free speech that is being critical of their handlers in the agency. Speaker 1: And Democrats can't even hear this story because it touches so many sort of culture war buttons, but it's it's a true story that a 100 of Biden's laptop suddenly became an issue about a week before the debate. And Anthony Blinken, who is now the secretary of the state and who is then the director of president Biden's campaign, went to Gina Haspel, who is the head of this director of the CIA, and and said to her, we need help with this. She then got 51 CIA current and former CIA officers. Speaker 0: Remember this whole headline? Everything you just said is true, and I'm about to show you the original sources, the actual documents. This is just basic facts. More than 50 former senior intelligence officials, it was 51 to be exact, signed this letter outlining their belief that recent disclosed emails about the laptop has all the classic earmarks of a Russian information operation. This is the actual letter, which no one decided to actually read because they lay out their allegations, and then they say, quote, we want to emphasize that we do not know if the emails provided to the New York Post by president Trump's personal attorney Giuliani are genuine or not, and that we do not have evidence of Russian involvement. Just that our experience makes us deeply suspicious that the Russian government played a significant role in this case. So literally nothing. They're just making up claims to do what exactly? I mean, it's not like the CIA has been doing election tomatoes all across the world ever since it was first founded. Look it up. They do it with bags of cash. They do it with coups. They do it with assassins, All sorts of things. In this case, they do it with information. And all 51 of these dudes sign this letter, and at the bottom, it tells you who they are. This is all of their names in the order in which they appear, and you only need to look up the first two to realize, Jim Clapper, former director of National Intelligence? Yeah. He perjured himself when he lied to us about the NSA spying operations. Oh, and Michael Hayden? Yeah. He set up those NSA spying operations, lied to us about them, and then he also lied to us about the torture programs at places like Guantanamo Bay. Oh, and by the way, Gina Haskill, the CIA director that RFK was referencing at the start, the one that got this all moving, yeah, she was actually involved in those illegal torture programs, and then she helped cover it up by destroying, like, a whole bunch of tapes of those programs at a black site. So the list of top intelligence officials are literally professional deep state liars, and we know that factually. I mean, if you knew history, you would know that before you even knew that because the job of the CIA is to lie to you. Think about it. You don't need a covert intelligence agency to do things that you're allowed to do in the open. Then you would just do it with the normal government. And this letter was originally provided to Politico by former top aid under CIA director John Brennan, Nick Shapiro. Nick Shapiro is an expert in crisis management for the CIA, like the kind of crisis where the guy you want to get into office suddenly has this big scandal coming out and you need to discredit it. That kind of crisis. Don't worry about the fact that the CIA is expressly forbidden from interfacing with anything on American soil and definitely with anything to do with elections. Definitely no election tomatoes here in America. Just protecting us from disinformation. And not just the kind of disinformation that is wildly embarrassing and not just the kind of disinformation that implies straight up pedophilic interest in his child niece. There's pretty much only one reason why a dude, duplicates the same photo of his child niece in her bathing suit over and over and over again all throughout his camera roll. Does it with pictures of her friends too. Has, like, whole photo shoots. It's super messed up. But, obviously, it was done to him and his siblings in their childhood too. Whole other rabbit hole. These things happen in cycles. But But it also had evidence of all sorts of much more governmental level corruption that you can find in reports like the court testimony of Jason Galantes, Hunter Biden's 3rd business partner, the one that would not play ball, and so they tried to lock him up and keep him out of the courtroom so that he could not tell the true story of what Hunter Biden had been up to, where he clearly alleges that he has multiple instances of knowing without any doubt that mister Joe Biden was very much aware of Hunter's business deals and was very much influenced on behalf of Hunter. This is in reference to China, but we all know it was in reference to Ukraine too, where it conveniently, a little war did you doozy happened? But, anyways, the letter was enough for Biden to call it misinformation on the debate stage and brush it aside for the mainstream media to run cover in every single publication, just fucking propaganda, despite us now having house oversight committee documents clearly detailing the forensic analysis of the actual accounts, bank accounts, money transferring in and out of Biden family bank accounts. But somehow people still wanna bury their head in the sand because they've been programmed to be so angry about this orange guy that they can't even face up to the fact that maybe there's more going on here. Like, oh, you could never believe that the president of the United States would do something like that? He would never be corrupt like that? First of all, not even up to him. It's the CIA doing these things, and we all know how they do. And second of all, I've got news for you. Mister Bill Clinton, the president of the United States, pause, think about it. He was inviting Jeffrey to the White House, like, 17 times. He was engaging in the services that Epstein provided all throughout his presidency, and they just invited him to speak at the DNC as if you don't have a memory, as if you don't know who he really is. This isn't like, oh, he likes chocolate ice cream on the side, and that's silly. This is like hello? What Bill was actually up to makes the Monica Lewinsky scandal seem like a typo. And what the CIA is actually up to is everything they accuse Orange Man Bat of doing. And don't get me wrong. I don't have any great love for Orange Man. I just abhor intelligence agencies meddling in our shit and then pretending like they're protecting us. So props to RFK for speaking the truth, finally, even at great personal risk. Props to anyone who's thinking for themselves. Props to Tucker for hosting great conversations. You don't need to agree with people these days on every topic in order to realize that some people are here for truth and honesty and righteousness and just whatever's real, and other people are straight up fucking lying. At this point, it's not about less than rights. It's not about reds and blues. It's about the liars, the corrupt, the evil, and those who have real opinions and honesty and integrity and are gonna have respectful conversations about our differences, not make up lies, tomato elections, and destroy our country. That's pretty much where we're at now, so basically, fuck the CIA.

@ShadowofEzra — Shadow of Ezra

Posted - December 8, 2024 at 8:45 PM

Saved - December 8, 2024 at 11:51 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

In 2017, I revealed that Donald Trump and the CIA were in a fierce battle over Syria, with the CIA focused on toppling Bashar al-Assad. Trump's defiance of the agency's plans led to a volatile clash, which I believe contributed to the rigging of the 2020 election in favor of Joe Biden.

@ShadowofEzra - Shadow of Ezra

In 2017, Julian Assange dropped a bombshell: Donald Trump and the CIA were locked in a fierce battle over Syria. Assange revealed that the CIA’s number one priority—and its biggest budget item—was to topple Bashar al-Assad. However, Trump’s decision to defy the agency and reject its plans to remove Assad sparked a volatile clash between the two. This is why the 2020 election was rigged in favor of Joe Biden.

Video Transcript AI Summary

There is a significant conflict between Donald Trump, his adviser Steve Bannon, and U.S. intelligence agencies, particularly the CIA. This tension centers on Syria, where the CIA has invested heavily in efforts to overthrow Bashar al-Assad. Trump's campaign policy suggested cooperation with Assad and Russia to combat ISIS, which contradicts the CIA's objectives. This creates challenges for the CIA, as many of its personnel have built careers and alliances with countries like Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and Turkey to support the overthrow of Assad.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Be aware that there is a serious conflict, between, say, Donald Trump, one of his strategic advisers, Steve Bannon, and other people around them, and the Central Intelligence Agency and some of the other US security agencies, quite a serious conflict, where they where they are pushing to they are pushing to preserve their power and make the president not change their policies that they want to keep. What's a prime example of that? I think it is the leading cause of this conflict. It is a policy on Syria. So the budgetary spend, the number one project of the CIA has been the overthrow of the government to Bashar al Assad by measured by the amount of their budget that they're spending. So they spend more of their budget on that than anything else. So Trump has an electoral during his campaign, a policy of not overthrowing Baselar Asset, although I don't think he put it explicitly like that, but cooperating with Asset and the Russians to attack ISIS, which essentially means not overthrowing, Basala Asset. So that's creating enormous problems for the CAA because not only do they have people that have specialized in doing that and to have risen to positions of power within the Central Intelligence Agency for doing that, but they've made extensive connections and alliances with Saudi Arabia, with Qatar, with Turkey, etcetera, in order to overthrow that government and, to support the forces, internal and external, that are trying to achieve.

@WarClandestine — Clandestine

Posted - March 2, 2025 at 9:15 PM

Saved - March 3, 2025 at 11:37 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

I believe that if you think Russia initiated the conflict in 2022, you might be misinformed. Understanding Victoria Nuland's role in Ukraine in 2014 is crucial. The Deep State, particularly the Obama administration, funded militant groups to instigate a civil war and orchestrated regime change. After the 2014 coup, the US effectively controlled Ukraine, using it for various covert operations. The buildup of Ukraine's military was aimed at confronting Russia, and the mainstream media has consistently misrepresented the truth about this situation.

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

If you still believe that Russia started this conflict in 2022, then you are either corrupt, ignorant, or brainwashed. If you don’t know who Victoria Nuland is, or what she was doing in Ukraine in 2014, then you have no idea what’s going on. The Deep State started this war. It was the Obama CIA/State Dept that funded Nazi militant groups to start a civil war in Ukraine, and initiated regime change to a CIA/State Dept puppet, Yatseniuk. This was all revealed in the leaked phone call between State Dept diplomats and Deep State agents, Victoria Nuland and Geoffrey Pyatt (link in next post). After the Maidan coup in February 2014, the US CIA/State Dept owned Ukraine via proxy, and the CIA began using Ukraine as a giant offshore playground for criminal racketeering and money laundering. Ukraine became one giant CIA base, directly on Russia’s border. Then the US/NATO began building up Ukraine’s army for the sole purpose of one day fighting Russia. The US/NATO began supplying Ukraine with weapons, equipment, missiles, training, intelligence, etc. Covert elements within the US government, along with their European partners in NATO, used espionage to overthrow and take control of the nation of Ukraine, then built a massive standing army on Russia’s border, then tried to bring Ukraine into NATO, and thus start WW3. If you are still buying the official MSM narrative about this conflict, you should not be engaged in conversations. Everything the MSM told you about Ukraine/Russia has been a lie, and in many cases, the inverse of the truth.

@WarClandestine - Clandestine

Link to BBC article from 2014 admitting the massive scandal at the US State Dept engaging in regime change. The MSM always leave these details out of the current narrative. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-26072281.amp

Ukraine crisis: Leaked phone call embarrasses US - BBC News An apparently bugged call between US diplomats reveals a frank exchange on the strategy for Ukraine and disparaging comments about the EU. bbc.com

@WallStreetApes — Wall Street Apes

Posted - August 21, 2025 at 1:20 AM

Saved - August 21, 2025 at 6:04 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

A retired senior CIA officer with 30 years of experience revealed that psychological operations typically used against foreign adversaries were repurposed to influence the American public and undermine Donald Trump. He stated that these tactics aimed to reverse the 2016 election outcome and prevent Trump's re-election in 2020. This officer, who served in high-risk areas, emphasized that the manipulation of information not only targeted Trump but also jeopardized the national security interests of the American people.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

A Senior CIA officer for 30 years confirms the psychological operations they use overseas were turned against Donald Trump and the American People to keep Democrats in power “An intelligence agent, now retired, very senior. He looked me in the eye and said, the truth of the matter is, we took the playbook for psychological operations and information warfare that we would use against our enemies, and we turned it against the American people to undo the 2016 election and to make sure they didn't elect Donald Trump in 2020. Now, that is a senior intelligence officer with more than 30 years of experience, a patriot who served in some of the most dangerous parts of the world, and he understood that the tactics of making something fake look real were ripped right out of our intelligence communities. Our intelligence agencies not only harmed Donald Trump, they were harming the American public, the national security interests of the American public”

Video Transcript AI Summary

"You wanna talk about an insurrection? This is a insurrection against the American people that was thwarted at multiple times." "He looked me in the eye and said, the truth of the matter is we took the playbook for psychological operations and information warfare that we would use against our enemies, and we turned it against the American people to undo the twenty sixteen election and to make sure they didn't elect Donald Trump in 2020." "Now that is a senior intelligence officer with more than thirty years of experience, a patriot who served in some of the most dangerous parts of the world, and he understood that the tactics of making something fake look real were ripped right up our out of our intelligence communities." "Our intelligence agencies not only harm Donald Trump, they were harming the American public, the national security interest of the American public."

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: You wanna talk about an insurrection? This is a insurrection against the American people that was thwarted at multiple times. Speaker 1: I sat across from an intelligence agent, now retired, very senior. He looked me in the eye and said, the truth of the matter is we took the playbook for psychological operations and information warfare that we would use against our enemies, and we turned it against the American people to undo the twenty sixteen election and to make sure they didn't elect Donald Trump in 2020. Now that is a senior intelligence officer with more than thirty years of experience, a patriot who served in some of the most dangerous parts of the world, and he understood that the tactics of making something fake look real were ripped right up our out of our intelligence communities. Our intelligence agencies not only harm Donald Trump, they were harming the American public, the national security interest of the American public.

@Vltra_MK — Michael Rae Khoury

Posted - December 13, 2023 at 9:26 PM

Saved - December 13, 2023 at 9:49 PM

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

Who’s ready for some REALLY DIFFICULT TRUTHS? https://t.co/WnltGsGtDU

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

I’m more of a Rip the bandaid off kinda guy… 🤷🏽‍♂️ The next few reports will be 🔥 https://t.co/afE3qdpceS

@Vltra_MK — Michael Rae Khoury

Posted - July 19, 2023 at 11:48 AM

Saved - July 19, 2023 at 2:22 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

The CIA, often seen as a patriotic organization, may not be what it seems. Queen Elizabeth's jealousy led to the creation of privateering, a legal form of piracy. Her pirate racket transformed into the East India Company. Jewish bankers became court factors due to prejudice. Indirect assassinations were outsourced to criminal proxies. The CIA was built on ruthless tactics taught by British intelligence. The British Empire captured the US government under the guise of a counterintelligence partnership. Admiralty Law enables black ops. Prominent Americans like MLK and JFK were assassinated. False flags were used to start wars, like the Gulf of Tonkin incident. Operation Northwoods involved plans for terrorism in the US. The CIA and MI6 arm and fund terrorist organizations. Criminal organizations provide funding for illegal CIA activities. War-torn countries become major drug producers. The CIA's involvement in the crack epidemic is no conspiracy. Royals still hold power.

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

< Black Ops 101 > The Dark Truth About the CIA ☠️ FULL THREAD 🧵 Many people think that the CIA is a patriotic organization that protects Americans from danger, and informs the President about what's happening in the world so he can make good decisions. But that couldn't be…

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

How It Started: Queen Elizabeth Gets Jealous In the 1500s, Spain was getting rich colonizing America, and the original Queen Elizabeth was feeling left behind. So she authorized a practice called “privateering”, which is essentially a legal version of piracy - where she would…

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

Reorganized Queen Elizabeth's pirate racket gets reorganized into a ruthless corporation: The East India Company After they defeated the Spanish Armada, the Queen reorganized her savage horde of pirates into the East India Company, which royals then used as the primary vehicle…

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

Reorganized Around Oligarchs Jewish Banking Oligarchs Christians were banned from becoming bankers in medieval Europe - so all banking was run by Jews. Royals used Jews as their "court factors" (aka chief bankers), because they were a small minority who faced extreme prejudice…

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

Masters of Indirect Assassinations Assassinations are much easier to keep secret when they are outsourced to criminal proxies. Emma Goldman was a criminal proxy (British intelligence asset) who led a worldwide movement of anarchists. Based out of London and funded by Banking…

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

Creating the CIA OSS = CIA During WW2, British intelligence (MI6) came over and built the OSS from the ground up - teaching the Americans the ruthless tactics they had been using for centuries. In 1947, OSS was reorganized into the CIA. Admirals Duped Military leaders saw…

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

Deal With The Devil Secret Partnership, Catastrophic Results Under the sneaky guise of a "counterintelligence partnership," the British Empire directly captures the US government, and uses it to further it's imperial ambitions across the globe. Unholy Alliance Since the…

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

Legal Logistics Black Ops Enabled By: Admiralty Law ⚓️ Admiralty Law was created centuries ago, before it was possible for military leaders deployed overseas to call their commander-in-chief and ask permission for things. So it gives Admirals the authority to order strikes and…

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

Assassinating Americans Royal Death Racket Prominent Americans deemed "counterintelligence threats" and assassinated by MI6: MLK Malcom X Robert Kenenedy

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

"They still won't release the JFK documents, 60 years later, because the assassination was ordered through the Crown. Meaning it can legally be kept secret forever."

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

Lying to Start Wars False Flags are murderous stunts that the CIA and military uses to trick the public into being okay with their racket wars: Gulf Of Tonkin The US Military knowingly lied to us about being attacked by North Vietnamese boats, and then used the lie to start the…

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

Operation Northwoods In the early 1960s, America's top military leaders reportedly drafted plans to kill innocent people and commit acts of terrorism in U.S. cities to create public support for a war against Cuba. Code named Operation Northwoods, the plans reportedly included the…

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

Arming Militants Most of the terrorist organizations on earth are funded and armed by D6 (the covert paramilitary wing of the CIA) & MI6: Mujahadeen in Afghanistan Drug Cartels in Central America ISIS & al-Nusra in Syria Neo-Nazis in Ukraine

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

Funding Sources Black-Ops Money Funding for the CIA's illegal rackets can't come from Congress (because if it did, there would be a paper trail). So the CIA makes deals with criminal organizations and uses that money to arm terrorists, kill people, rig elections, and manipulate…

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

World's Biggest Drug Dealers Opium (aka Heroin) Places the United States goes to war (i.e Afghanistan & Vietnam) end up becoming the world's biggest heroin producers: Vietnam & Laos During the Vietnam War, Vietnam and Laos became the world's leading producer of heroin. It…

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

Responsible for: Crack Epidemic The Black Community has known for decades how the CIA (via their MI6 proxies) intentionally flooded black neighborhoods with highly addictive crack-cocaine. At the time, they were widely dismissed as conspiracy theorists, but over the last decade,…

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

Royals still rule us Thread:

Twitter / ? twitter.com