reSee.it - Related Post Feed

KanekoaTheGreat
Posted - April 27, 2023 at 2:42 AM
Saved - April 27, 2023 at 12:21 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Pfizer's vaccine documents reveal disturbing revelations. The injections had negative efficacy, caused heart damage in youth, and dangerous lipid nanoparticles quickly distribute throughout the body. More than 42,000 adverse events, including 1,200 deaths, were reported in just the first three months. Pfizer knew there was a danger to fertility and that lipid nanoparticles damage the placenta during pregnancy. Women suffered 16 reproductive disorders, resulting in a 13 to 20 drop in live births. LNPs also degrade baby boys in utero.

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

.@NaomiRWolf 'The Greatest Crime Against Humanity In History': 11 Revelations From Pfizer's Vaccine Documents #1: Pfizer knew their gene-based injections had negative efficacy as early as November 2020 #2: Shortly after the release of the COVID injections, Pfizer moved to hire 2,400 full-time employees to process the paperwork of the injured #3: Pfizer and the FDA withheld information that the shots cause heart damage in youth for four months while an aggressive propaganda campaign drove many thousands to get injected #4: Rather than staying in the injection site, Pfizer knew the shot’s dangerous lipid nanoparticles quickly distribute throughout the body to the brain, liver, and adrenals, and accumulate in the ovaries #5: Pfizer documents acknowledge more than 42,000 adverse events, including 1,200 deaths, in just the first three months, including strokes, hemorrhages, blood clots, lung clots, leg clots, neurological disorders, dementia, guillain-barré, bell’s palsy, myalgia, and more #6: Prior to it being legal, more than 1,000 children were injected, and Pfizer’s documents indicate a high rate of serious injury #7:Available records of study participants who conceived children show 80% lost their babies #8: Pfizer knew there was a danger to fertility. Lipid Nanoparticles damage the placenta during pregnancy, causing early deliveries #9: Pfizer docs show that lipid nanoparticles also enter breast milk, stunting, injuring, and sometimes killing babies #10: Pfizer docs show 3 to 1 of AEs sustained by women, 16% ‘reproductive disorders.’ ‘What kind of monsters look at 16% reproductive disorders and keep going?’ Results: ‘13% to 20% drop in live births' #11 Pfizer documents reveal that LNPs “degrade baby boys in utero” by traversing “the testes of fetal baby boys” and damaging “the Sertoli cells and the Leydig cells, which are basically the factories of masculinity” https://lifesitenews.com/news/the-greatest-crime-against-humanity-in-history-naomi-wolfs-11-revelations-from-pfizer-vaccine-documents/

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims that Pfizer documents reveal evidence of a crime against humanity. They state that Pfizer knew the vaccines didn't work to stop COVID just one month after rollout and that the vaccines had vaccine failure and failure of efficacy. The speaker also highlights that Pfizer was receiving numerous reports of adverse events and had to hire staff to process the paperwork. They argue that the vaccines caused heart damage and other severe side effects, and that the materials in the vaccines biodistribute throughout the body, including the brain and ovaries. The speaker suggests that this is a deliberate bioweapon attack by the Chinese Communist Party and calls for justice.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Pfizer documents contain evidence of the greatest crime against humanity in the history of our species. And I'm so sorry to have to walk you through this, but there's no way around it. We just have to go through. And the beauty of Hillsdale is that You all are tough and like truth. And so with truth, we can prevail, but it's painful. Some of the things that came to light, just some headlines. Pfizer knew, for instance, 1 month after rollout, So that's November of 2020 that the vaccines didn't work to stop COVID. Indeed, in the Pfizer documents A month after rollout, and this is marketing post marketing, so it's out there. The spokesmodels are telling you to do it. The ads are in social media. You know, the ads are on television. A month after rollout, Pfizer's internal documents identify that the vaccines have vaccine failure and failure of efficacy. And they identify that the 3rd most common side effect of the Pfizer Vaccine is COVID. The 2nd headline, which is stunning, is that within a month or two, Pfizer was getting so many reports of adverse events, meaning bad things happening to people who had been injected, that they understood that they needed to hire 2,400 full time staffers in order simply to process the paperwork of the adverse events that they were receiving reports of, as well as to prepare for the flood of adverse events that they knew they would get in the near future. Pfizer knew in May of 2021 That the vaccines had caused heart damage in 35 minuteors within a week after the injection. And yet and Pfizer knew, right? You've got to understand that all of these documents Say FDA confidential at the bottom of them. Right. Pfizer and the FDA shared these documents. And the FDA knew that 35 minuteors sustained heart damage. But the government of the United States, and I'm embarrassed to say I voted for these people, Didn't tell parents until August of 2021 that there was an elevated risk of heart damage in healthy young adults 4 months later. And in those 4 months, what did the young adults of America receive? A constant battering with propaganda on social media, on television, in news outlets bought up by many in the CARES Act as well as from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation with like influencers showing off their injection site, saying, you know, we can do this together. We can be strong. Do it for grandma. All of this aimed at young adults. They did not tell the young adults, The healthy young adults of the United States, your generation, that this was elevating a risk of heart damage till 4 months later. You may recall that the CDC said that the materials of the injections stay in the injection site And the materials are lipid nanoparticles. They are mRNA, and the lipid nanoparticles are an industrial fat, which is covered in polyethylene glycol, which is a petroleum byproduct, right, and spike protein. Well, the CDC said it stays in the injection site and then it said and I remember asking doctors, like relatives who are doctors and were funded by NIH grants. Where does the spike protein go? And they were like, you know, when you're a journalist, you've got an ear for nonsense. They were like, well, Your body metabolizes it, you know, or, well, you'll digest it and excrete it. And it's like they had no evidence to give me to show me The basis for their response. But in fact, that's not what happens to these materials. And Pfizer knew that. These materials biodistribute. This is Pfizer's language. Throughout your body in 48 hours. And where do they settle? Well, lipid nanoparticles are designed to cross every membrane in the human body. They've known this for 10 years. So where do these ingredients go? They go to the brain. Some of you have noticed changes in the personalities of loved ones who have Take these injections. They biodistribute to the liver, the adrenals, the spleen. And if you're a woman, they accumulate in your ovaries. Now, these are industrial fats coated with polyethylene glycol in your ovaries. Okay. And what's really scary, Doctor. Robert Chandler, who's a respected Pathologists who treated the Lakers and the Angels, he wrote this report and he shows that the chart shows the graph going down as it leaves the injection site, but going up as it accumulates in these various organs over time. And what's incredibly scary for a woman is that there's no mechanism that we've found by which the body gets rid of the lipid nanoparticles in the ovaries. So your 1st injection, some go into your ovaries. Your 2nd injection, more go into your ovaries. Your booster, more go into your ovaries. There's no mechanism with which the body can release this material that we've seen. And Pfizer knew. So the lipid nanoparticles, as I mentioned, cross every membrane in the human body. And Not unexpectedly or not surprisingly in the Pfizer documents, it shows that in only 3 months, there were 1200 plus deaths out of 42,000 plus adverse events. And there are catastrophic categories of the kinds of side effects that people sustain. And what's so heartbreaking to me knowing this is that these are not the same side effects that the CDC tells you about or your doctor tells you about. The CDC will say you'll have fatigue, you'll have chills maybe. There'll be a little swelling at the injection site. That's not what's in the Pfizer documents. There's at industrial scale strokes, hemorrhages, blood clots, lung clots, Leg clots, neurological disorders, dementia type disorders, Guillain Barre, Bell's palsy. I mean, the neurological disorders are at industrial You'll scale, but also side effects you don't necessarily expect. But now that I know about them, I see them everywhere. The number one side effect is joint pain, which is so interesting, right? Did the CDC tell you about joint pain? And yet I know healthy young adults, healthy young adults who are limping or who have had knee problems or shoulder problems, their shoulders separated. Well, think about lipid nanoparticles. They go through every membrane. They're going through cartilage. They're destabilizing cartilage. And the other surprising side effect is myalgia, muscle pain. And again, I know healthy men in their 40s 50s, you know, ate right, went to the gym, all the things, organic Food in constant pain from muscle pain. And that's right there at industrial scale in the Pfizer documents. But you are not told about that. But in addition, it's I mean, I don't say lightly that it's mass murder. There are 61 deaths from stroke, for example. Half of the stroke adverse events took place within 48 hours of the injection. There are 5 deaths from liver damage. And half of the liver damage adverse events took place within 48 hours of the injection. Now, one of the most disturbing reports is Report 56, which is about children. This is so chilling. So the emergency use authorization for children didn't get passed until about 4 or 5 months ago. But In early 2021, in other words, when it wasn't legal to do this, Pfizer injected 62 kids, some of them as young as 2 months old. 28 of them, we don't know what happened to them. That we don't know if they survived. Among the 34 whose records are still in the Pfizer documents, there's a 7 year old British girl who sustained a stroke. And there's a 2 month old baby with liver damage. And so this is such a chilling report because It's clear, and we did additional investigation of this, there were 1,000 kids in the United States in different university hospitals, including Rochester Medical Center that were experimented on prior to it being legal to inject children with this material. And I can promise you these are what society calls throwaway kids. These are not kids whose parents have lawyers. These are not kids whose parents have a voice. We're going to find that these are kids who are institutionalized, who are orphaned or discarded in some way and used in this way. Now I want to dial are you guys okay? Am I keep going? Okay. All right. All right. It's tough. Now I want to go to the centerpiece of what we found in the Pfizer documents. It's not even the deaths. It's not even the disabilities. What is abundantly clear and I don't say this lightly, I'm Jewish, my grandmother lost 9 brothers and sisters in the Holocaust I don't Talk about Mengele or Nazi experiments lightly. But in the center of the documents, there is a literally Mengele type experiment at a Experiment at a grand scale on human reproduction. 360 degree Experiment on how to disrupt and impair human reproduction. So, for example, in the Pfizer documents, women were told not to get pregnant, which is interesting, right? It's a respiratory Disease, why would you tell women not to get pregnant? But nonetheless, 2 70 women got pregnant. Out of these 2 70 women, Pfizer lost To the records, which is illegal, you're supposed to, by law, follow subjects to the end of the trial, they lost the records of 2 34 of these pregnant women. Of the 36 women whose pregnancies came to term, over 80% of them lost their babies. Spontaneous abortion or miscarriage. Many people have asked me, is shedding real? Right? Anecdotally and in fact, I got deplatformed because I reported that women were describing disruptions in their own menstrual cycles or feeling ill around other women, like coworkers who had recently received an injection. Shedding is real. In the Pfizer documents, Pfizer defines exposure to the vaccine as skin contact, Inhalation and sexual intercourse, especially at conception. And this is very bad news and I'm sorry, but they seem to identify the risk or the transmission of exposure to the vaccine as male to female in sexual intercourse. And they specifically told the men in the trials not to have intercourse with childbearing age women and, if they did, to use 2 reliable forms of birth control. So there was clearly something about conceiving with a vaccinated male that Pfizer was guarding against. So we know now that there's horrific damages to conception from this injection. As I keep saying, the lipid nanoparticles traverse every membrane. The placenta is a membrane. Of course, I mean, the most sacred place in the world is the placenta with a baby gestating in it, right? You can't, you can't impair or compromise that membrane, without damaging that fetus and that fetal environment. The lipid nanoparticles traverse the placenta. They get into the environment of the fetus and maternal fetal Medicine specialist named Doctor. Jim Thorpe has found in his patients that the placentas have a network of calcifications caused by these lipid nanoparticles. And babies are being delivered earlier because of these impaired or compromised placentas. And he's seeing at great scale chromosomal abnormalities in newborns of vaccinated mothers. Lipid nanoparticles in the Pfizer documents are also revealed to enter breast milk. And this stands to reason Remember, we were told, oh, these materials stay in the injection site. Well, they're circulating through the blood. What is breast milk made of? It's built up out of blood and lymph. So the lipid nanoparticles covered in polyethylene glycol Our entering breast milk of nursing mothers and nursing babies in the Pfizer documents sustained seizures. And 1 baby died in the ER after nursing from a vaccinated mother from multi organ system failure. 4 of the moms who are lactating in the Pfizer documents had breast milk that turned blue green. And by the way, this is not just the Pfizer documents. The NIH did a study Subsequently, that also found that babies nursing from vaccinated moms were having failure to thrive, not putting on weight. They were agitated and restless and sleepless. They downplayed it. But I just want to I want to tell you, like, as a woman, just For a moment, it's hard, right? It's hard enough to be a healthy woman menstruating, conceiving a baby, carrying a baby, delivering a baby, Nursing a baby, these are great, great gifts, but they take a lot of strength and stamina and social support and love. They're not easy to do. And nursing a baby is not easy to do at its easiest, when you're at your most healthy. So I want to tell you that as a woman and as a feminist and as a mom, when I read that nursing mothers have gone in the last 2 years from 34 Sent of all moms to 16% of moms, something's wrong, right? Not only are babies in the next generation not getting that primal experience of total love, total nurture, total safety, which is so important. But there's something that is leading the moms to not be able to nurse those babies. And I think we have a clue here in the contamination of vaccinated moms' breast milk. I also want to note that Bill Gates Rolled out lab grown breast milk right at the moment that women were suffering these harms to their own ability to sustain their children. Doctor. Chandler, in the Pfizer documents, I'm also going to say it's a Constant theme is a war against women and really a war against women's ability to reproduce. In the Pfizer documents, Doctor. Chandler found that Of the adverse events, 72% of them were sustained by women. And this is constant throughout. It's a constant three to one women to men. It's not that men are not being harmed, but it's that women are being harmed so disproportionately. And Of the 72% of adverse events, there's this chart which is so hard to look at in the Pfizer documents in which Pfizer defines 16% of those adverse events as, quote, their words, reproductive disorders. Their words. In that chart and this is 0.49 for men. Not that that's not, You know, bad, it's bad, but it's like, what kind of monsters look at 16% reproductive disorders, and keep going. In that chart, in that section of the documents, there's a kind of a sub chart with names, scientific names. And again, if you're a woman or a mom, this is going to make your head explode. There are 20 different scientific names for ruining women's menstrual cycles in that chart Right there. And this is why I say Nazi medicine because, you know, it's bad enough what the Nazis did, but an additional layer of what's Schilling and anti human is how scientific their records were. So there's a scientific name for having 2 periods a month or a scientific name for bleeding every single day of the month or a scientific name for not having any menstrual cycle at all all month and you can Assume you're not fertile or not easily fertile under those circumstances. Horrible I mean, there are children in the audience, so I don't want to get too graphic. But Scientific names for the most horrible things you can imagine being done to the bodies of women. You know, women Years postmenopausal bleeding, 10 year old girls having menarche upon being injected and horrible things that I won't describe being part of women's experience of menstruation. So I just want you for a minute To imagine as educators and as parents, not even as students because I feel like I'm burdening you enough with this information, but Think about how hard it is. You know, women have so many jobs, right? They're students, they're moms, their workers, their wives, their parents. I guess I said moms. It's a big job. You know, and now imagine doing that with this Bilitating health condition, let alone trying to just conceive a baby and bring a baby to term and have a healthy delivery. So not surprisingly, and this relates directly to my being deplatformed a year and a half ago, not that what happened to me Personally, it's important compared to what happened to everyone. Not surprisingly, in 2022, Around the world, 9 months after the rollout in most of Western Europe, there's a 13 to 20% drop in live births All over Western Europe and North America and Singapore and Australia, 13 to 20% drop in live births with stunning sub data like double the number of stillbirths in Scotland, a highly vaccinated country. 89 stillbirths in Canada in 1 province when usually they have 2 or 3. Doctor. Thorpe describes 5 or 6 miscarriages a week when before they would have 2 a month. Absolute baby die off is what I called it in an early essay about this. So let me now tell you, this is not universal. It's not around the world. This drop, this A murderer of the next generation is not global. It's Western Europe and North America. And I'll get to the meaning of that shortly. So I mentioned that men and boys are not You know, spared, Amy Kelly, for instance, found that lipid nanoparticles degrade baby boys in utero. They don't even have to be vaccinated. Of course, the testes are a membrane, so these lipid nanoparticles traverse the testes of fetal baby boys and degrade the Sertoli cells and the Leydig cells, which are basically the factories of masculinity. So We don't know if these little baby boys of vaccinated moms are going to be able to grow up to be sexually functioning adult men. The Sertoli cells and Leydig cells are responsible for the male hormonal balance that create things like deep voices, Hair on their bodies, broad shoulders, all of the things that we associate with normal masculinity, and that is being degraded. So and again, when I say like why why this focus on reproduction, It's a respiratory virus. Right? So why in the Pfizer documents did they mate rats, sacrifice the rats and then analyze the sexual the cells of the sexual organs of the rats. Right. It's a respiratory virus. So these are monsters and there there's no way to avoid concluding that they're focused on disrupting human reproduction. So that's a lot, a lot. And now I'm going to step back and put it in geopolitical context and answer some of the questions about why from my point of view. Very hard to process that anyone would do this. It's very tempting to think, well, they're just greedy. They couldn't stop. You know, they were making so much money. These are oversights. You know, we've had greedy corporations in our history before, the jungle, right. That's not what this is. Ladies and gentlemen, I'm sorry to tell you. I firmly believe, and I'll give you my evidence now, that this is a bioweapon and that we're under attack. So Let me step back now and tell you who made the Pfizer injection. You may well think, as I did, that a German company made the Pfizer injection, but that's not true or that's not the whole truth. Pfizer is a German Chinese company and specifically its subsidiary BioNTech, which it purchased right before the pandemic, is a German Chinese company. BioNTech signed an MOU, which is a memorandum of understanding with Fosun Pharmaceuticals in 2021. So Fosun Pharma is wholly owned by the Chinese Communist Party. It's one of the biggest and most important pharmaceutical companies in China. And you may not know that every corporation in China is basically run by the Chinese Communist Party or answers to the Chinese Communist Party. So pardon me, which is why it's nonsense for Doctor. Fauci to think that Wuhan is a bunch of independent scientists scampering along, doing nice things for America. They're run by the CCP and by the People's Liberation Army of China. So Fosun Pharma, which is whose CEO is a senior official in the CCP, didn't just sign an MoU with BioNTech. But in 2021, if you look at the SEC filing, which is our stock exchange filing for BioNTech, It shows 100% completed tech transfer of the technology, the IP From BioNTech to China. It doesn't say to a Chinese individual, to a Chinese company. It says The words to China, which means that right now in 2023, if you get a Pfizer injection, you're getting an injection whose IP Key and IP can mean the formula that they're using. It can mean the data harvested from using it. It can mean the manufacturing process. It can mean any of those. But all of that is owned by China now when it goes into your American body in America. Not only that, Fosun Pharma, They don't give this injection to the people of China. And by the way, I'm an anti racist. This is not an anti Chinese position I'm taking. It's an anti Chinese Communist Party position I'm taking because they want to kill us. Okay. So The manufacturing plants, this stuff is not going into the people on the mainland of China. BioNTech and Fosun created a 1000000000 doses And they opened 13 manufacturing plants in Western Europe to distribute these doses. And they opened 2 of them in the United States of America. 1 is in Princeton, New Jersey, And one is in Springfield, Massachusetts. CCP owned manufacturing plants producing the injection That goes into the bodies of schoolchildren here in the United States of America. Now, in 20 18, there was a study by a group of Chinese scientists that showed that lipid nanoparticles damage fertility, mammalian fertility. So they knew. They knew when they were making up this formula that it did this. In 2021, There was a study in Hong Kong, which again is overseen by the Chinese Communist Party, that showed that the first injection Enlarges the heart, causes some problems in rats, and the 2nd injection causes catastrophic harms in those rats. The hearts are enlarged. There's visible white patches on the hearts and it's multi organ system failure again. So to me, I'm not a scientist and it's kind of lucky I come from the world of politics and journalism. To me, it is obvious that that's an experiment to show the Chinese Communist Party how you kill Westerners without leaving fingerprints. There's more I can tell you About why I believe this is a bioweapon, think about who got mandated. And I'm very much influenced in my conclusions about this by my husband, Brian O'Shea, who spent 12 years in military intelligence and then in the intelligence community and from the very beginning was saying, this is China, this is China, it's a bioweapon. And I was like, Honey, I love you, but that's crazy. And then he showed me so much primary source documentation that there's no way to avoid this conclusion. But Look at who got mandated with these injections. And as a political consultant, you learn to reason backwards. You look at the effect and then go you draw conclusions from the effect because the story is made up always, right? That's you learn that as a political consultant. The principals will set a goal. They'll say get us to this goal. And then the chief of staff goes to the message shop, meaning the storytellers, and says, tell a story to get people to accept this goal. And that's how politics works. So what is the effect? Right. I'm not I'm not asking you to think about the Story, which is save your grandma, you know, do it for the community. Right? Safe and effective. That's the story. The effect? Who got mandated? Our military got mandated. Our first responders, our health care workers, our doctors And nurses got mandated. Why? Vaccine doesn't affect transmission. We know that. Why? Right? How do you cripple a society? Our elites' kids got mandated. I just spoke at Yale. You know, I have loved ones at Princeton. I have loved ones at Cornell. These parents are distraught, which is why I love Hillsdale so much. But, you know, how to cripple A country take out the kids of the leaders. Right? Take out the kids of the wealthy, the kids of the elite. Who else got mandated? You know, firefighters got mandated. All the people we need in order to defend ourselves are the ones who got mandated. Pilots got mandated. Right. Cripple a society. They went for those populations and they went for those populations Rigidly. Right? There's no reason that every university except 6, including Hillsdale, had to mandate the kids, except that HHS gave them the money and they said you have to do it. Right. Well, this is a captured administration and captured institutions that are allowing the CCP and their allies, the World Economic Forum, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, to cripple our country. As Brian put it, the CCP wants our land. They want our natural resources. They don't want our people. So that's what you've got. And later studies like those of Ed Dowd show that disability among 18 to 39 year olds is off the charts, which is just what you want in what's called an asymmetric warfare, which is The CCP likes to not have a kinetic war, but to kind of degrade and demoralize a population rather than having a hot war with the shooting. And that's exactly what's going on. And the last thing I'll say for my evidence is that, of the adverse events I mentioned there are 42,000 of them in the Pfizer documents. 36,000 plus are in the United States. About 8,000 plus are in Western Europe in order of political importance, so Britain, Germany, France, Spain, Greece, Italy, like that. Out of all the rest of the adverse events, 7,000 adverse events, roughly, All the 51 countries around the world other than Western Europe and North America where this was deployed, They all of those only account for 7,000. So that's not random, right? That's targeting North America and Western Europe. And the last thing I'll say for my evidence that this is a bioweapon and this is super, super chilling and creepy is that It's so easy to target a subject by with this injection, by things as simple as temperature or dose because lipid nanoparticles are liquid at super cold temperatures. You remember the news stories about Has to be really chilled, has to be they have to have special refrigerators. That's true. But lipid nanoparticles coalesce, Clot, solidify at room temperature and at body temperature. And what you've seen is the guidance about how to store these has changed constantly. So first, it was like Keep it in the freezer, and it was like, you can leave it out for 2 hours. Then it was like, you can leave it out for 6 hours. So there's constant variation in the directions originating from China about how to store this injection. And temperature alone can cause problems. And the other thing I'll tell you is dose, and this is absolutely horrific. But Pfizer dose of active ingredients is 30 micrograms. Moderna is 100 micrograms, more than 3 times as much. And someone I love got injured by the Moderna vaccine. Well, in the Pfizer documents, it says that 100 microams is so high They had to drop it internally due to its reactogenicity, Pfizer's words. They didn't tell everyone who got the Moderna dose that this was too high and they shouldn't take a booster. They just kept going. Do you know what the dosage is for children? They want it to be 100 micrograms. Tiny children. So that is my incredibly dark Summary to you of what's in the Pfizer documents. I now want to pivot in just the minute or 2 I have left to happier thoughts because I don't want you to leave here clinically depressed and giving up all hope. There's a lot of hope in truth. And again, that's why I love this community even though I'm brand new here because the most horrible things can be faced if You know, embrace this principle of liberty and of truth and community. So Pfizer has announced that they have 430,000,000 doses that And it's vanishingly small numbers of parents who have given in to the relentless propaganda to vaccinate their children with mRNA injection. So informed consent makes a difference and informed consent is the law which people conveniently forgot in the medical establishment in the last two and a half years. We have lawyers suing Pfizer, And I do believe and there are a lot of good bills that are being introduced to strip Pfizer of its impunity from lawsuits. And I thoroughly hope and believe, I believe we're looking at a mass murder situation, war crime, crimes against humanity. And I believe and hope that all of these evildoers, as friendly as they look in their little outfits Talking to the cameras, I hope they will all face justice in this lifetime. And the last thing I want to say, and I promise I'll make it fast and I'll Take questions is this has been such a hard journey for me and for Amy Kelly and for all these volunteers to go on because we're really looking at this abyss of human evil every single day. It's like looking at Baba Yar, you know, when that was first opened to the world. It's completely hard to believe that such a thing has taken place and is still taking place. But I guess very quickly, I just want to say that This experience has forced me to believe in God more literally than I had before. And I know that sounds paradoxical, but I felt like this evil overtook the world in lock STEP, in perfect unison, in a way that I could not explain using my critical thinking, my great education. It It didn't act like any history previously, right? It was far less random. And there was something metaphysical about it and the way people were just lost in delusion, all in 1 delusion. The media all told 1 lie, doctors who were Healers 1 minute were death dealers the next minute. Something absolutely metaphysical about it that went beyond human history. So I do believe I've concluded I don't have answers, but I've concluded that we're in a time like really a biblical moment where humanity is being asked to choose, basically. And, I mean, this is very subjective, but I kind of believe that God is going, okay, this is how bad humans can be if you lose touch with me. You know? It's it's this bad. So I don't really know the answer to that except to say out loud, which I never used to do, that I believe that. And, you know, and I guess, You know, I read the Bible a lot these days and I read the Old Testament a lot and I keep turning to If my people who are called by my name will humble themselves and pray and seek my face and turn from their wicked ways, then I will hear from heaven and I will forgive their sin and heal their land. So I believe that. So God willing, thank you very much. Thank you very much. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you so much. Thank you so much. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you so much.
pwleaks
Posted - June 17, 2023 at 1:04 AM
Saved - June 17, 2023 at 11:56 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Adverse reactions related to COVID19 mRNA vaccines in pregnant women were known and recorded in VAERS in early 2021 but not disclosed to patients. Complications include fetal death, stillbirths, sudden death of mom, myocarditis, heart attacks, strokes, and infant sudden deaths. Several cases are documented in VAERS. Doctors should have advised their pregnant patients about these risks as part of informed consent. Every pregnant woman should be aware of the risks before taking the vaccine.

@pwleaks - Patrick Webb

BREAKING: Adverse reactions related to the COVID-19 mRNA vaccine in pregnant women were known and recorded in VAERS back in early 2021, but were not disclosed to patients.

@pwleaks - Patrick Webb

Complications in pregnant women who took COVID-19 mRNA vaccines include: * miscarriages (fetal death <= 20wk) * stillbirths (fetal death > 20wk) * sudden death of mom before, during or after delivery * myocarditis, heart attacks, strokes, dying in sleep * infant sudden deaths

@pwleaks - Patrick Webb

CASE 01 (VAERS 1070770) – Pregnant woman had 1st Pfizer jab on Feb.4, 2021 at 7wk5d pregnancy. Fetus stopped growing 6 days later (8wk4d), no heartbeat and she had miscarriage Feb.22, 2021 (18 days after Pfizer) https://www.medalerts.org/vaersdb/findfield.php?IDNUMBER=1070770

Search Results from the VAERS Database medalerts.org

@pwleaks - Patrick Webb

CASE 02 (VAERS 1964955) – 31 year old pregnant woman had 1st Pfizer jab at 18 weeks pregnancy and suffered fetal cardiac arrest and therapeutic abortion. https://www.medalerts.org/vaersdb/findfield.php?IDNUMBER=1964955&WAYBACKHISTORY=ON

Search Results from the VAERS Database medalerts.org

@pwleaks - Patrick Webb

CASE 03 (VAERS 2009647) – Pregnant woman had 1st Pfizer dose at 4wk pregnancy on May 18, 2021 and her fetus had cardiac arrest 15 days later at 6wk3d resulting in miscarriage. https://www.medalerts.org/vaersdb/findfield.php?IDNUMBER=2009647&WAYBACKHISTORY=ON

Search Results from the VAERS Database medalerts.org

@pwleaks - Patrick Webb

CASE 04 (VAERS 2230334) – Pregnant woman had 1st Moderna dose Jul.30, 2021 and 2nd Moderna dose on Aug. 27, 2021. Next day, fetus had pulmonary hemorrhage and peritoneal hemorrhage resulting in stillbirth on Aug. 28, 2021 at 38 weeks gestation. https://www.medalerts.org/vaersdb/findfield.php?IDNUMBER=2230334&WAYBACKHISTORY=ON

Search Results from the VAERS Database medalerts.org

@pwleaks - Patrick Webb

CASE 05 (VAERS 2386294) – 34 year old Pregnant woman had 3rd Pfizer jab on Jan. 20, 2022. Then 20 days later fetus had pulmonary hemorrhage resulting in stillbirth at 34+3 weeks. Cause of death: PLACENTAL FAILURE. https://www.medalerts.org/vaersdb/findfield.php?IDNUMBER=2386294&WAYBACKHISTORY=ON

Search Results from the VAERS Database medalerts.org

@pwleaks - Patrick Webb

CASE 06 (VAERS 2046121) – Pregnant woman had 2nd dose of Moderna on Oct.20, 2021 and 6 days later fetus died due to “clotting at the placenta” and fetal vascular malperfusion. Reported cause of death: clotting at the placenta. https://www.medalerts.org/vaersdb/findfield.php?IDNUMBER=2046121&WAYBACKHISTORY=ON

Search Results from the VAERS Database medalerts.org

@pwleaks - Patrick Webb

CASE 07 (VAERS 2463841) – 30 year old pregnant woman had 3rd Pfizer jab on Dec. 18, 2021 Stillbirth on Feb. 23, 2022. Cause of death: placental insufficiency caused by severe maternal vascular malperfusion. https://www.medalerts.org/vaersdb/findfield.php?IDNUMBER=2463841&WAYBACKHISTORY=ON

Search Results from the VAERS Database medalerts.org

@pwleaks - Patrick Webb

These COVID-19 mRNA vaccine related adverse events were known and recorded in VAERS in early 2021 so every doctor should have been advising their pregnant patients about these documented and known adverse events, but they chose not to.

@pwleaks - Patrick Webb

Every pregnant woman should have had these risks explained to them as part of informed consent. The risks of Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 mRNA vaccines to the fetus include:

@pwleaks - Patrick Webb

* fetus can stop growing and die immediately after taking the mRNA vaccine or up to several days, weeks or months later, resulting in miscarriage or stillbirth; * fetus can suffer cardiac arrest and die; * fetus can suffer pulmonary hemorrhage and die; (1/2)

@pwleaks - Patrick Webb

* fetus can die from placental blood clots * fetus can die from placental insufficiency or placental failure * fetus can die from congenital malformations (2/2)

@pwleaks - Patrick Webb

https://medalerts.org/index.php

Search VAERS Database medalerts.org
stkirsch
Posted - August 17, 2023 at 9:37 AM
Saved - August 17, 2023 at 10:57 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Pfizer's Phase 23 study on pregnant women who received their vaccine remains undisclosed, defying the legal requirement to share results within a year. Only injection site data was posted, leaving crucial pregnancy outcomes unaddressed. Clinical trial NCT04754594 failed quality assurance, leaving us uncertain about safety. Despite the lack of data, pregnant women are still advised to get vaccinated. This negligence is concerning, and while some may dismiss it, Dr. Naomi Wolf won't be pleased.

@stkirsch - Steve Kirsch

BREAKING: Pfizer posted the results of their Phase 2/3 study that COMPLETED on July 15, 2022 on what happens when you give the Pfizer vaccine to pregnant women. By law, you have 1 year to post the results. Well, guess what? They REFUSED TO POST IT as required by law. They said, we'll post it in a year from now. They just posted the injection site results. Nothing about what happened in the pregnancies!!! Look: it's basically BLANK:

@stkirsch - Steve Kirsch

Clinical trial number: NCT04754594 Home page for trial: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04754594 Results posted by Pfizer didn't pass QA: https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/history/NCT04754594?V_21&embedded=true… On all the interesting issues they said, "Stay tuned." In short, we still don't know if this is safe, but the CDC is still telling pregnant women to get it based on NO DATA. I predict that Dr. Naomi Wolf (@naomirwolf) is not going to be happy about this at all. It's outrageous. They had one year to post the data and posted nothing. The rest of the medical community will simply ignore this and tell pregnant women to get the jab.

tatiann69922625
Posted - August 17, 2023 at 9:59 AM
Saved - August 17, 2023 at 10:57 AM

@tatiann69922625 - for a true and human medicine

@stkirsch - Steve Kirsch

BREAKING: Pfizer posted the results of their Phase 2/3 study that COMPLETED on July 15, 2022 on what happens when you give the Pfizer vaccine to pregnant women. By law, you have 1 year to post the results. Well, guess what? They REFUSED TO POST IT as required by law. They…

VigilantFox
Posted - August 22, 2023 at 7:34 PM
Saved - September 1, 2023 at 7:14 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Maternal death rates in America have surged by 50% since the vaccine rollout, according to a report by the National Center for Health Statistics. The maternal mortality rate for 2021 was 329 deaths per 100,000 live births, a significant increase compared to previous years. While the rate has been gradually rising over the past three decades, the surge in deaths in 2021 is concerning. Some sources attribute the increase to COVID, but the introduction of vaccines should have mitigated this. Dr. McCullough suggests that the COVID vaccines themselves may be a factor. Pregnant women were excluded from initial vaccine trials, yet thousands received the vaccine later. The safety and effectiveness of the vaccines for pregnant women remain questionable. The high maternal death rates in 2021 raise concerns about what the numbers will look like in 2022.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

🚨 Disturbing Trend: Maternal Death Rates Have Soared 50% in America Since Vaccine Rollout A “terrible report” by the National Center for Health Statistics, came out earlier this year. What that report shows is that maternal death rates are increasing in America — and fast.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Children and pregnant women were used as shields to protect the elderly, which was a violation of human ethics. Despite pregnant women being excluded from randomized trials, thousands of them were vaccinated when the vaccine program started in the United States. The maternal mortality rate in the country reached an all-time high, with women dying while pregnant or within 42 days after giving birth. The CDC reported that 65% of women who had a baby in the United States received a vaccine either before or during their pregnancy.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: For the first time ever, we used children as shields to protect the elderly, it seems to me. Well, you know, even children and pregnant women, that was one of the biggest violations of human ethics. Remember, pregnant women and women of childbearing potential strictly excluded from the randomized trials Right. As they came in in November. December 10th, when this vaccine program started in the United States, thousands of pregnant women were vaccinated, now what pregnant woman would come forward and do it, number 1? Number 2, who would actually do that? They must know that that's not right. And then things took off. You know, terrible report came in spring of this year. HOYERT, National Center For Health Statistics, published on the CDC website, maternal mortality in the United States, all time high. It's erased decades. This is women dying with babies in the womb or 42 days afterwards. And we know the CDC separately has told us 65% of women who delivered a baby in the United States took a shot either before the pregnancy or during the pregnancy.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#2 - The WHO defines maternal death as “the death of a woman while pregnant or within 42 days of termination of pregnancy, irrespective of the duration and the site of the pregnancy, from any cause related to or aggravated by the pregnancy or its management ...”

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#3 - In plain English, that means the death of a pregnant woman from non-accidental causes within 42 days following or during pregnancy.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#4 - “The maternal mortality rate for 2021 was 32.9 deaths per 100,000 live births, compared with a rate of 23.8 in 2020 and 20.1 in 2019,” according to the National Center for Health Statistics.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#5 - That’s a 38.2% increase compared to 2020 and a 63.7% increase from 2019. Overall, a 50% increase in maternal mortality — very troubling numbers.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#6 - In all fairness, the maternal death rate in America has been gradually rising over the past three decades, despite spending the most money on healthcare, but the surge in maternal deaths in 2021 is an outlier, even with the prior trend.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#7 - So, what’s causing the sharp increase? Sources like CNN put the blame on COVID, but COVID existed in both 2020 and 2021. And with the introduction of “miracle vaccines,” that should have slowed down maternal death rates from COVID, right? So, why the sudden rise?

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#8 - Dr. McCullough expressed to Del Bigtree on The Highwire that so-called COVID vaccines themselves might have something to do with it.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#9 - “This is women dying with babies in the womb or 42 days afterwards. And we know the CDC separately has told us 65% of women who delivered a baby in the United States took a shot either before the pregnancy or during the pregnancy.”

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#10 - He added that injecting pregnant women when the vaccine program began was “one of the biggest violations of human ethics.” Pregnant women and those of childbearing potential were not included in the initial randomized COVID vaccine trials in November.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#11 - However, by December 10, when the vaccine program began in the U.S., thousands of pregnant women received the vaccine.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#12 - And from there on, public figures like former CDC Director Rochelle Walensky repeatedly told pregnant women to get vaccinated. “There is no bad time!”

Video Transcript AI Summary
It is safe to get vaccinated while breastfeeding. There is no bad time to get vaccinated, whether you are thinking about having a baby, pregnant, or have already delivered your baby.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Is it safe to get vaccinated while you're breastfeeding? It absolutely is safe to get vaccinated. So I would say if you are thinking about getting vaccinated, there is no bad time to get vaccinated. Get vaccinated while you're thinking about having a baby, before you're thinking about having a baby, while you're pregnant with your baby or after you've delivered your baby, there is no bad time.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#13 - “Get vaccinated while you’re thinking about having a baby, before you’re thinking about having a baby, while you’re pregnant with your baby, or after you’ve delivered your baby. There is no bad time!”

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#14 - How could Rochelle Walensky confidently assure pregnant women and women hoping to become pregnant that the COVID vaccines were “safe and effective” if pregnant women were excluded from the initial randomized trials?

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#15 - And one question remains: if the 2021 maternal death rates are this high, what will the 2022 numbers look like?

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

END - If you found this thread newsworthy or to hold valuable information, please share the initial tweet below to increase exposure:

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

And while you're here, check out these other stories that I've written: Ed Dowd Drops Bombshell Data: Hematological (Blood-Related) Claims Up 522% Above Trend in 2022 https://vigilantnews.com/post/ed-dowd-drops-bombshell-data-hematological-blood-related-claims-up-522-above-trend-in-2022

Ed Dowd Drops Bombshell Data: Hematological (Blood-Related) Claims Up 522% Above Trend in 2022 “The trends were stable — and then this exploded.” vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

RFK Jr. Identifies “The Real Shooter” Behind His Father’s Death https://vigilantnews.com/post/rfk-jr-identifies-the-real-shooter-behind-his-fathers-death

RFK Jr. Identifies “The Real Shooter” Behind His Father’s Death “When I sat down and read the autopsy report, it became clear to me, as it would to anybody who read that report, that Sirhan could not have killed my father.” vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

The ‘Next Pandemic’: What You Need to Do to Be Ready https://vigilantnews.com/post/the-next-pandemic-what-you-need-to-do-to-be-ready

The ‘Next Pandemic’: What You Need to Do to Be Ready “You’ve seen all the threats from the establishment suggesting that there’s not going to be drug availability in the not-too-distant future ... So, look at that and protect yourselves.” vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

RFK Jr. Identifies “The Real Shooter” Behind His Father’s Death https://vigilantnews.com/post/rfk-jr-identifies-the-real-shooter-behind-his-fathers-death

RFK Jr. Identifies “The Real Shooter” Behind His Father’s Death “When I sat down and read the autopsy report, it became clear to me, as it would to anybody who read that report, that Sirhan could not have killed my father.” vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

“X” Is Not Living Up to What Elon Musk Promised: Here’s Why https://vigilantnews.com/post/x-is-not-living-up-to-what-elon-musk-promised-heres-why

“X” Is Not Living Up to What Elon Musk Promised: Here’s Why Elon Musk is widely hailed as a genius, a disruptor, and sometimes, a misfit. However, several of his promises to uphold Twitter (now X) as a ‘“free speech” platform have fallen through. vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Spike Proteins 101: What You Need to Know to Keep Yourself Safe https://vigilantnews.com/post/spike-proteins-101-what-you-need-to-know-to-keep-yourself-safe

Spike Proteins 101: What You Need to Know to Keep Yourself Safe It's now known that spike proteins linger in the body, potentially causing damage to vital organ systems. But recent research has shed light on potential strategies to mitigate the effects of the spike protein. vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

I Asked AI to Draw Me the Next President of the United States: This Is Who Appeared https://vigilantnews.com/post/i-asked-ai-to-draw-me-the-next-president-of-the-united-states-this-is-who-appeared

I Asked AI to Draw Me the Next President of the United States: This Is Who Appeared The next question we should ask: what does Midjourney know that we don’t? vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

The Unvaccinated Will Be Vindicated: A Tribute to the Citizen Heroes of Our Time https://vigilantnews.com/post/the-unvaccinated-will-be-vindicated-a-tribute-to-the-citizen-heroes-of-our-time

The Unvaccinated Will Be Vindicated: A Tribute to the Citizen Heroes of Our Time Mandates are now becoming a thing of the past, thanks to brave freedom fighters who had the courage to say NO. vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Two years ago, I never imagined that I would be reporting the news every day. It's been a wild ride, and all your support has been nothing short of incredible. I'm beyond grateful to be able to take this next step. Thank you all. And don't forget to give @VigilantNews a follow. https://t.co/z1mv2JFfGG

GlobalFreedomM
Posted - September 7, 2023 at 5:08 PM
Saved - September 8, 2023 at 7:17 AM

@GlobalFreedomM - Global Freedom Movement

Remember, we knew that they didn’t have the data to say they were safe and effective for pregnant women or breastfeeding women. This was the information available when they made those claims: https://t.co/Z1M1jzEROM

@GlobalFreedomM - Global Freedom Movement

https://t.co/GEeU9bngkz

@GlobalFreedomM - Global Freedom Movement

She didn't have the data to make these claims. She still doesn't. Pregnant women are always the last to receive experimental medical products. Criminal negligence and malpractice.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Vaccines do not affect fertility, despite the common misconception. There is no increased risk of complications for you or your baby after being immunized. This includes no differences in miscarriage, preterm birth, stillbirths, or birth defects.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: They do not affect fertility. There's no way that they can do that. But that is one of the common, lies that is out there right now. There is no increased risk of complications after being immunized to you or to your baby. There are no differences in miscarriage, preterm birth, stillbirths or a birth defect.
HopeRising19
Posted - November 12, 2023 at 8:07 PM
Saved - November 15, 2023 at 11:25 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The Pfizer pregnancy trial data, released after a year, falls short. Instead of the promised 4,000 participants, only 348 women were involved, limiting its value. The trial excluded older or unwell pregnant women, not reflecting real-world scenarios. Moreover, the study focused on late-stage pregnancies, missing crucial information on first-trimester risks. Pfizer also delayed the release of efficacy data for two years. These shortcomings raise concerns about the vaccine's safety and effectiveness for pregnant women.

@HopeRising19 - NZ and the MRNA

THE PFIZER #COVIDVACCINE PREGNANCY TRIAL HAS MORE HOLES THAN A SWISS CHEESE... The definitive #pfizer pregnancy trial data was (quietly) released several weeks ago. Pfizer completed the trial one year ago, and waited 364 days to release the data for public viewing. Two years ago in 2021 they pledged to complete a trial with 4,000 pregnant participants. What they actually performed was an "underpowered" trial with a mere 348 women, half of whom received an inert placebo. The size of the trial immediately negates much of its value, with the impossibility of detecting serious adverse events with an incidence rate less frequent than 1 in 180 women. Besides the trial participants being too few to provide real evidence of safety, there was also a rigorous selection process for trial participants, screening out all but those mothers in optimal health. The trial group does not represent real world use where many older, co-morbid or otherwise unwell pregnant women will be injected. All women were 27 to 34 weeks gestation when injected, a stage when the baby’s major development has already occurred, thus reducing or eliminating any evidence of increased risk of congenital malformation in the fetus in the vaccinated mothers. The first 12 weeks of pregnancy are the most fragile and vulnerable. By eliminating first trimester women from the study, the Pfizer trial provides no information relating to risk of miscarriage resulting from their product. Pfizer have announced that there will now be a DELAY of one more year before they publish the EFFICACY data relating to how effective their product is at preventing covid infection in the pregnant mother and resulting offspring. Also missing from the dataset was a full account of birth outcomes. Of the 348 women in the trial, Pfizer only reported on the birth of 335 live babies. Of the 13 pregnancies unaccounted for, Pfizer reported one foetal death (stillbirth) in the vaccine group and the outcome of the other 12 pregnancies remains unknown. This trial was Pfizer's opportunity to silence its critics of pregnancy vaccination once and for all....and move forward with a well tested vaccine proven "safe and effective" for pregnant women and their babies. Instead... They delayed release of the safety data for ONE YEAR They have delayed release of EFFICACY data for TWO YEARS past the completion of trial. Any intelligent and discerning pregnant mother must ask herself why, with billions of dollars at their disposal, Pfizer BioNTech failed so miserably at providing pregnant women the world over, with the evidence based assurance of SAFETY AND EFFICACY that they deserve. #nz #mrna #pregnancy #covidvaccines #adverseevents #informedconsent https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/history/NCT04754594?V_21=View#StudyPageTop

AnwaltUlbrich
Posted - November 14, 2023 at 8:26 PM
Saved - May 9, 2024 at 3:36 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The posts discuss the potential risks and concerns surrounding COVID-19 vaccination for pregnant women. They highlight various studies and sources that suggest adverse effects, including miscarriages, stillbirths, and congenital anomalies. The author criticizes the media for not providing a balanced perspective and urges readers to evaluate the information critically. The posts emphasize the need for further research and caution regarding vaccination during pregnancy.

@AnwaltUlbrich - Tobias Ulbrich

I won't soon forget the crime against pregnant women and the endless suffering. @rosenbusch_ had posted the link from mdr (a German public broadcasting department of the first public Television in Germany)I won't soon forget the crime against pregnant women and the endless suffering. https://mdr.de/wissen/corona-impfung-schwangere-frauen-wann-schutz-fuer-kinder-100.htm The misery caused by this reporting makes my face flush with anger. Please, dear mdr - paragraph 14 of the press code requires you to read the available material in its entirety and to evaluate it, not to use it as advertising propaganda. I will only try to briefly outline what is missing and it is by no means everything. 1. PSUR#3 from BioNTech Out of 130 women observed who were vaccinated by BioNTech within the first trimester of pregnancy, there were 14 abortions and one stillborn child at birth and another 14 children with congenital anomalies. That is 25 percent of the pregnant women observed! In a group of pregnant women in which the third of the pregnancy in which the vaccination took place was not recorded, BioNTech found that out of 617 women, 25 women had a termination of pregnancy and 2 stillbirths at the time of birth and 10 babies were born with anomalies. That is 6 percent. Even with the data from Table 69 of the PSUR#3, there cannot and should not be a vaccination recommendation in the case of the identified risk of harm. 2. package insert from BioNTech for the Omicron vaccination page 2: "Pregnancy and breastfeeding" If you are pregnant or think you may be pregnant, tell your doctor, healthcare professional or pharmacist before receiving this vaccine. No data are yet available on the use of Comirnaty Omicron XBB.1.5 during pregnancy." There is an increased risk of myocarditis and pericarditis as well as heavy menstrual bleeding. 3. breastfeeding mothers transfer modRNA to their babies while breastfeeding. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36156636/ 4 BioNTech and Pfizer discontinued the studies with vaccinations in pregnant women because they were too shocking. Therefore, BioNTech was never able to deliver the safety reports for pregnant women. 5. A summarized scientific study on the effects of BNT162b2 in pregnancy and on menstruation. https://jpands.org/vol28no1/thorp.pdf 6. lipid nanoparticles and ModRNA enter the placenta. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36597546/ 7. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36789893/ 8. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21342124/ 9. apoptosis (programmed cell death) https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26526105/ 10. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33523869/ 11. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22052087/ 12. One of the most shocking documents is this one, which shows what they did to the women in the study and why the study was stopped. https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/125742_S2_M1_pllr-cumulative-review.pdf?ref=VFOX 13. https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/125742_S1_M5_5351_c4591001-interim-mth6-protocol.pdf?ref=VFOX 14. Archive of clinical studies on BNT162b2 https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/history/NCT04754594?V_21=View#StudyPageTop 15. What happens to the newborns if the mothers have been vaccinated. A study on this: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapediatrics/fullarticle/2810937 So now everyone can judge the balance of the article. A society that accepts such reporting without reaction is no longer mine. #crime #pregnantwomen #vaccination #placenta #fetus #miscarriage #deadbirth #vaccinedamage #sideeffects 8:38 pm. - Nov. 14, 2023 -

Seite nicht gefunden | MDR.DE mdr.de
Detection of Messenger RNA COVID-19 Vaccines in Human Breast Milk - PubMed Detection of Messenger RNA COVID-19 Vaccines in Human Breast Milk pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Lipid Nanoparticle Composition Drives mRNA Delivery to the Placenta - PubMed Ionizable lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) have gained attention as mRNA delivery platforms for vaccination against COVID-19 and for protein replacement therapies. LNPs enhance mRNA stability, circulation time, cellular uptake, and preferential delivery to specific tissues compared to mRNA with no carrier … pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Ionizable Lipid Nanoparticles for In Vivo mRNA Delivery to the Placenta during Pregnancy - PubMed Ionizable lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) are the most clinically advanced nonviral platform for mRNA delivery. While they have been explored for applications including vaccines and gene editing, LNPs have not been investigated for placental insufficiency during pregnancy. Placental insufficiency is caus … pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Nanoparticulate drug delivery in pregnancy: placental passage and fetal exposure - PubMed During the past decade there has been an explosion in the number of nanoparticulate drugs or drug delivery systems being explored, developed and marketed for the treatment and prevention of human diseases. While the potential dangers of drug administration in pregnancy are well known, there are circ … pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Nanoparticles can cross mouse placenta and induce trophoblast apoptosis - PubMed Our findings suggest that nanoparticles can cross the placenta and be taken up by fetal organs. Certain concentrations of carboxylate-modified polystyrene nanoparticles may be cytotoxic to trophoblasts, which could alter placental function. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Ionizable lipid nanoparticles for in utero mRNA delivery - PubMed Clinical advances enable the prenatal diagnosis of genetic diseases that are candidates for gene and enzyme therapies such as messenger RNA (mRNA)-mediated protein replacement. Prenatal mRNA therapies can treat disease before the onset of irreversible pathology with high therapeutic efficacy and saf … pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Transport of nanoparticles through the placental barrier - PubMed Nanoparticles (NP) are organic or inorganic substances, the size of which ranges from 1 to 100 nm, and they possess specific properties which are different from those of the bulk materials in the macroscopic scale. In a recent decade, NP were widely applied in biomedicine as potential probes for ima … pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

@rosenbusch_ - henning rosenbusch

***** ***** ***** ***** ********** ******** ******* ******. ****. https://www.mdr.de/wissen/corona-impfung-schwangere-frauen-wann-schutz-fuer-kinder-100.html t.me/Rosenbusch

Nestschutz: Nur Corona-Impfungen während der Schwangerschaft helfen Babys | MDR.DE Wie schützen Eltern ihre Kinder nach der Geburt am besten vor der Gefahr durch Corona? Daten aus Singapur zeigen: Es kommt auf den Zeitpunkt an, an dem sich werdende Mütter gegen Covid-19 impfen lassen. mdr.de
ichudov
Posted - November 18, 2023 at 8:43 PM
Saved - November 19, 2023 at 1:25 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
A recent study reveals the harmful effects of COVID vaccines on newborns when administered to mothers. Premature births, NICU admissions, and fetal abnormalities are among the listed concerns. Notably, Moderna, with its higher dose, appears to have the most detrimental impact. In pregnant women, Moderna increases the risk of miscarriage by 42% compared to the lower-dose Pfizer vaccine. The probability of this finding being a random occurrence is extremely low. Additionally, Moderna doubles the chances of infant death compared to Pfizer. These findings suggest a dose-response relationship, resembling the effects of poisons. While Pfizer also poses risks during pregnancy, Moderna proves to be even more concerning.

@ichudov - Igor Chudov 🐭

A new study shows how COVID vaccines, given to mothers, harm their newborns. Premature births, NICU admissions, and fetal abnormalities listed. Moderna (higher dose vaccine) is the worst! https://www.igor-chudov.com/p/covid-vaccines-harm-newborns-study

COVID Vaccines Harm Newborns, Study Proves Moderna Causes More Fetal Damage than Pfizer due to Higher Dose igor-chudov.com

@ichudov - Igor Chudov 🐭

Moderna (a higher dose vaccine), when given to pregnant women, leads to a 42% higher chance of miscarriage compared to lower-dose Pfizer. Probability that it is a random fluke finding is less than 0.00001. Read here: 👇 https://www.igor-chudov.com/p/cdc-data-moderna-causes-42-more-miscarriages

CDC Data: Moderna Causes 42% MORE Miscarriages Compared to Pfizer Is there a DOSE-RESPONSE Relationship? igor-chudov.com

@ichudov - Igor Chudov 🐭

Moderna (a higher-dose vaccine), given to pregnant women, DOUBLES the chances of infant death, compared to the lower-dose Pfizer vaccine. Read here: 👇 https://www.igor-chudov.com/p/moderna-doubles-the-chance-of-infant

Moderna DOUBLES the Chance of Infant Death, Compared to Pfizer Another Slide from CDC Presentation Shows Statistically Significant Difference igor-chudov.com

@ichudov - Igor Chudov 🐭

That the higher-dose treatment increases chances of adverse outcomes (miscarriage and infant death) means that there is a dose-response relationship, typical for poisons. Pfizer is also bad for pregnancy - but Moderna is even worse.

charlis_beauty
Posted - December 7, 2023 at 1:33 PM
Saved - December 7, 2023 at 7:50 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Pfizer's latest vaccine, ABRYSVO, targets unborn babies, claiming to protect them against RSV. However, clinical trials revealed low birth weight in infants born to vaccinated pregnant individuals. This controversial drug raises concerns about potential adverse reactions. Shameful marketing tactics continue.

@charlis_beauty - CHARLÍS

This is just pure madness. Pfizer has now released a vaccine for babies who aren’t even born yet. From their own advertisement: “Get vaccinated during weeks 32-36 of your pregnancy to help protect your baby against RSV” “In clinical trials where ABRYSVO was compared to placebo, infants born to pregnant individuals experienced low birth weight” These people are shameless criminals, marketing a new drug yet again for pregnant women that has caused adverse reactions.

DiedSuddenly_
Posted - December 7, 2023 at 1:37 PM
Saved - December 7, 2023 at 9:02 PM

@DiedSuddenly_ - DiedSuddenly

Pfizer is back on a murder spree, this time focusing on babies in the womb who can’t defend themselves.

@charlis_beauty - CHARLÍS

This is just pure madness. Pfizer has now released a vaccine for babies who aren’t even born yet. From their own advertisement: “Get vaccinated during weeks 32-36 of your pregnancy to help protect your baby against RSV” “In clinical trials where ABRYSVO was compared to placebo, infants born to pregnant individuals experienced low birth weight” These people are shameless criminals, marketing a new drug yet again for pregnant women that has caused adverse reactions.

ClareCraigPath
Posted - February 29, 2024 at 9:12 PM
Saved - March 1, 2024 at 7:45 AM

@ClareCraigPath - Dr Clare Craig

"These 2 cases demonstrate the ability of the COVID-19 vaccine mRNA to penetrate the fetal-placental barrier and to reach the intrauterine environment." For three years pregnant women have been told this is not a risk. https://www.ajog.org/article/S0002-9378(24)00063-2/fulltext

JimFergusonUK
Posted - March 7, 2024 at 2:22 PM
Saved - March 7, 2024 at 4:08 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A recent study published in the American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology suggests that the COVID-19 mRNA vaccine can spread to the placenta and fetal blood. The study detected vaccine mRNA in the placentas of two vaccinated pregnant women and found spike protein expression in placental tissue. This raises concerns about the potential effects on pregnancy. A call for a moratorium on the use of COVID-19 vaccines in pregnant women has been made.

@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson

Alert: A call for the immediate Moratorium on the use of Covid-19 Vaccines in pregnant woman. The Ontology of Covid-19 Vaccine Deception: ACOG, ABOG, and SMFM and the Future of the Human Genome – Are They Playing with Fire? A recent research study published on Jan. 31, 2024 by the American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology indicates that the COVID-19 mRNA vaccine is not, in fact, localized to the injection site, but rather can spread systematically to the placenta and fetal blood. For context, the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (AJOG) is a peer-reviewed journal of obstetrics and gynecology. Popularly called the “Gray Journal,” AJOG is considered by most to be the pinnacle of journals in the specialty of Ob/Gyn. Since 1920, AJOG has existed as a continuation of the American Journal of Obstetrics and Diseases of Women and Children, which began publishing in 1868. This most recent research study published by AJOG on Jan. 31, 2024, entitled Transplacental transmission of the COVID-19 vaccine messenger RNA: evidence from placental, maternal and cord blood analyses post vaccination, found that COVID-19 vaccine mRNA was detected in the placentas of two pregnant mothers who had been vaccinated with Pfizer’s mRNA COVID-19 vaccine shortly before delivery. The study also found that spike protein expression was detected in the placental tissue of the earlier-in-time vaccinated mother, demonstrating bioactivity of the COVID-19 vaccine mRNA after reaching the placenta. https://www.americaoutloud.news/a-call-for-immediate-moratorium-on-the-use-of-covid-19-vaccines-in-pregnant-women/

A call for Immediate Moratorium on the use of COVID-19 Vaccines in pregnant women This most recent research study published by AJOG on Jan. 31, 2024, entitled Transplacental transmission of the COVID-19 vaccine messenger RNA: evidence from placental, maternal and cord blood analyses postvaccination, found that COVID-19 vaccine mRNA was detected in the placentas of two pregnant mothers who had been vaccinated with Pfizer’s mRNA COVID-19 vaccine shortly before delivery. The implications of these research findings are profound... americaoutloud.news
jathorpmfm
Posted - April 5, 2024 at 6:42 AM
Saved - April 5, 2024 at 7:00 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
There are two clear sources of data regarding the alleged safety of COVID-19 vaccines in pregnancy. The first is a document from Pfizer that reveals concerning statistics, including deaths and adverse pregnancy outcomes. The second is a peer-reviewed study published in a medical journal, which has not been refuted or challenged. Other studies supporting vaccine safety have conflicts of interest and lack transparency. It is important to conduct personal research and be aware of the entanglement between the pharmaceutical industry and medical journals.

@jathorpmfm - James Thorp MD

There are only TWO irrefutable data sources that are clear as to the alleged safety of the COVID-19 vaccines in pregnancy. The first is Pfizer 5.3.6 https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/reissue_5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf that colluded w HHS CDC FDA to hide it for 75 years. Their data are clear - the Covid vax was the deadliest and most injurious drug ever rolled out in the history of medicine with 42,086 casualties including 1,223 DEAD in just 10 weeks (page 7 pictured below) and catastrophic pregnancy outcomes (page 12 pictured below). The second is published in a peer reviewed medical journal from a governmental database totally open sourced, using FDA methodology documenting breaches of FDA defined safety signals (PRR 2 or greater) in 18 adverse events in pregnancy (including malformations). This has been published for over a year, anyone in the world has been able to has duplicate this study- - NOBODY has refuted or challenged it. Thorp JA, Rogers C; Deskevich, MP, Tankersley S, Benavides A, Redshaw, M.D.; McCullough, P.A. COVID-19 Vaccines: The Impact on Pregnancy Outcomes and Menstrual Function. Journal of the American Physicians & Surgeons Spring 2023; 28(1) https://www.jpands.org/vol28no1/thorp.pdf Every other study documenting safety of the vaccine in pregnancy is published in terminally corrupted medical journals, NOT open source, extreme conflicts of interest with authors & journals refusing transparency. The fraudulent Shimabukuro NEJM with the CORRUPT Editor in Chief Eric Rubin is the classic case in point and irrefutable proof. The LANCET May 2020 Mehra article falsely impugning safety & efficacy of hydroxychloroquine is another classic case in point and irrefutable proof of terminal pharmaceutical kleptocratic entanglement of all the major journal - even the “most prestigious & influential medical journals in the world- NEJM & LANCET. To see details of these fraudulent publications see page 170-171 of the following peer reviewed article to read verifiable truths of these scandals: https://www.thegms.co/medical-ethics/medethics-rw-22071901.pdf Do your own due diligence. The terminal corporate kleptocratic entanglement of pharmaceutical industry with NEJM & other journals and the CDC FDA was proven at the turn of the century by long term NEJM Editor Dr Marcia Angell. The publications supporting the safety & efficacy of the COVID vaccines have massive conflicts of interest. Take the publications from UCSF for example - their own website boasts the most NIH funding than any other institution in the USA and this is reviewed in the following article: americaoutloud.news/a-call-for-imm… RES IPSA LOQUITOR CUI BONO

Kingston_Truth
Posted - May 6, 2024 at 6:41 PM
Saved - May 7, 2024 at 4:36 PM

@Kingston_Truth - Karen Kingston

In Pfizer's baby and toddler study, there was a subgroup of 344 babies. Only 3 babies (less than 1%) made it to the end of the study. Pfizer's mRNA injections are not safe for babies. They're lethal. https://karenkingston.substack.com/p/what-happened-to-their-babies-bb1

Video Transcript AI Summary
The evidence shows that out of 344 babies in a Pfizer trial, only 3 completed it, with reasons like hospitalization and death leading to discontinuation. Less than 1% of babies finished the trial, yet it's claimed to be safe. The speaker questions the safety of these injections, citing reports of babies experiencing symptoms similar to sudden infant death syndrome.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So the evidence is there, and the evidence is is overwhelming. It is catastrophic, you know, and it's hard to go through it, especially when I go through the babies data. 344 babies between the ages of 6 months and less than 2 years. Babies who were to get free of Pfizer's injections over an 11 week period. Only 3 babies made it to the end of the trial. Reasons for discontinuation include hospitalization and death. Less than 1% of the babies make it to the end of the trial, and they said this is safe for babies. I would not have been wailing out to God if there was any indication that these things are safe to use in any human being. The judge would have to say, I I I I hate humanity. I am a godless person, and I I support an evil authoritarian regime. You would that's the only conclusion you can come to when you actually look at the body of evidence of what what these injections have done in such a short period of time. There's reports of the babies becoming having a symptom of of it's like dead baby syndrome. They died.
What Happened to their Babies? In Pfizer's baby and toddler study, there was a subgroup of 344 babies. Only 3 babies (less than 1%) made it to the end of the study. Pfizer's mRNA injections are not safe for babies. They're lethal. karenkingston.substack.com
KanekoaTheGreat
Posted - June 27, 2024 at 6:27 PM
Saved - June 28, 2024 at 12:12 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Pfizer is accused of concealing critical data about the safety and efficacy of its COVID-19 vaccine. The company allegedly used confidentiality agreements to suppress information and delayed the release of data. The vaccine control group was destroyed after emergency use authorization. Safety signals for adverse events like myocarditis, strokes, and reproductive system effects were reportedly detected. Pfizer is also accused of misrepresenting the durability of vaccine protection and censoring speech on social media. The full report can be found in the linked article.

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

Oxford Professor Carl Heneghan has extracted the main points from Kansas Attorney General's lawsuit against Pfizer, and they're damning. 1. Pfizer used its confidentiality agreements with the U.S. Government and others to conceal, suppress, and omit material facts relating to Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine, including the safety and efficacy of the vaccine. 2. Pfizer used an extended study timeline to conceal critical data – the study was repeatedly delayed, including a delay from January 2023 to February 2024 because of a late vaccination of a single study participant (out of 44,000 participants). 3. The FDA did not immediately make the safety and effectiveness data for Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine available, claiming it would take 55 years, but a federal judge forced them to release 55,000 pages per month rather than 500. 4. Pfizer destroyed the vaccine control group once the FDA approved emergency use authorization in December 2020. 5. In its press release announcing the emergency use authorization, Pfizer did not disclose that it had excluded immunocompromised individuals from its COVID-19 vaccine trials. 6. Pfizer knew its COVID-19 vaccine was connected to serious adverse events, including myocarditis and pericarditis. 7. By March 2021, the United States military and Israel's Ministry of Health detected a safety signal for myocarditis. 8. In August 2021, after Pfizer obtained FDA approval through emergency use authorization to provide its COVID-19 vaccine to 12-15-year-olds, Pfizer decided to study “how often” its vaccine may cause myocarditis or pericarditis in children by testing 5-16-year-olds for troponin I. 9. Pfizer also detected a safety signal relating to strokes. The FDA's and CDC's “surveillance system flagged a possible link between the new Pfizer-BioNTech bivalent COVID-19 vaccine and strokes in people aged 65 and over," and an FDA study found that individuals 85 years or older who received both a flu vaccine and Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine “saw a 20% increase in the risk of ischemic stroke.” 10. Pfizer’s knowledge of a safety signal for increased fatalities. In February 2021, Pfizer’s adverse events database contained 1,223 fatalities after taking Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine. 11. Pfizer only tested the booster shot on 12 trial participants who were in the 65- to 85-year-old age range and did not test it on any participant older than 85. 12. Pfizer did not publicly release adverse event data from its database. By February 28, 2021, Pfizer’s adverse events database contained 158,893 adverse events from 42,086 case reports, including 1,223 fatalities, although Pfizer did not make causality findings. Pfizer was receiving so many adverse events reports that it had to hire 600 additional full-time staff and expected to hire more than 1,800 additional resources by June 2021. Pfizer had such a backlog of adverse events that it might take 90 days to code “nonserious cases.” Pfizer did not know “the magnitude of under-reporting. 13. Pfizer announced a study on pregnant women but omitted the fact that more than one in ten women (52) who received Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine during their pregnancy reported a miscarriage, many within days of vaccination. Six women who received Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine during their pregnancy reported premature deliveries; several babies died. 14. Pfizer’s February 18th, 2021, press release also did not disclose other adverse effects on the reproductive systems of women who received Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine. By April 2022, Pfizer knew of tens of thousands of adverse advents connected to its COVID-19 vaccine, including heavy menstrual bleeding (27,685), menstrual disorders (22,145), irregular periods (15,083), delayed periods (13,989), absence of periods (11,363) and other reproductive system effects. 15. Pfizer’s study on pregnant women failed. They destroyed the placebo control group, and the results were kept secret. 16. Pfizer misrepresented and concealed material facts relating to the durability of protection provided by its COVID-19 vaccine. 17. Pfizer said its COVID-19 vaccine would prevent transmission even though it knew it had never studied the effect of its vaccine on transmission. 18. Despite admissions by Pfizer Chairman and CEO Dr. Bourla and Board Member Dr. Scott Gottlieb that Pfizer did not know if its vaccine prevented transmission, Dr. Bourla warned Kansans on multiple occasions that not receiving a COVID-19 vaccine would affect the lives of those around them, thus implying that Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine prevented transmission. 19. Pfizer worked to censor speech on social media that questioned Pfizer’s claims. On July 19th 2021, Pfizer Board Member Dr. Scott Gottlieb claimed social media companies had an “obligation” and an “affirmative responsibility” to prevent the spread of COVID-19 vaccine misinformation on their platforms. Pfizer Chairman and CEO Dr. Bourla called people who spread misinformation on COVID-19 vaccines “criminals” who have “literally cost millions of lives.” 20. Pfizer worked to conceal and suppress material facts. On August 24th, 2021, Pfizer Board Member Dr. Scott Gottlieb contacted Twitter to complain about a column written by Alex Berenson that criticized Dr. Anthony Fauci. On August 27th, 2021, Dr. Scott Gottlieb had a conference call with Twitter employees to discuss Mr. Berenson. Twitter banned Mr. Berenson the next day. Dr. Gottlieb also contacted Twitter about removing posts related to natural immunity, which "Twitter later slapped with a misleading label and blocked the ability to like or share the tweet." The full article is linked below.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Pfizer marketed its vaccine as safe for pregnant women, but reports showed adverse events and miscarriages. They denied a link between their vaccine and heart conditions, despite evidence. Pfizer claimed effectiveness against variants, but data showed otherwise. They also misled about transmission and censored criticism on social media. Pfizer avoided government oversight in vaccine development. Despite these issues, Pfizer successfully marketed their vaccine in Kansas. Multiple states are filing suits against Pfizer.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Pfizer marketed its vaccine as safe for pregnant women. However, in February of 2021, Pfizer possessed reports for 458 pregnant women who received Pfizer's COVID 19 vaccine during pregnancy. More than half of the pregnant women reported an an adverse event and more than 10% reported a miscarriage, many within days of the vaccination. Pfizer also possessed information from its own October 2020 study on pregnancy in rats indicating that its COVID 19 vaccine was likely linked to infertility, loss of litters, and stillborn offspring. Number 2, safety relating to heart conditions like myocarditis. Fire Pfizer consistently denied any evidence of a connection or safety signal between its COVID 19 vaccine and myocarditis or pericarditis. Indeed, on January 18, 2023, when asked whether its vaccine caused strokes or my myocarditis, Pfizer chairman and CEO Alan Bourla stated, quote, we've not seen a single a single signal, although we have distributed billions of doses, end quote. A signal that he was referring to as a safety signal, which refers to a negative consequence. However, as Pfizer knew, the United States government, the United States military, foreign governments, and others had found that Pfizer's COVID 19 vaccine caused myocarditis and pericarditis. Number 3, effectiveness regarding variant variance. Pfizer also claimed that its COVID 19 vaccine protected against COVID 19 variants even though data available at the time showed Pfizer's vaccine was effective less than half the time against variants. Finally, transmission. Pfizer urged Americans to get vaccinated in order to protect their loved ones, clearly indicating a claim that Pfizer's COVID 19 vaccination stopped transmission of COVID 19. Pfizer Pfizer later admitted that it never even studied transmission of it after its vaccines received the vaccine and whether they could say it stopped transmission. After making these misleading statements, Pfizer also engaged, in some censorship attempts. Emails reveal that Pfizer officials coordinated with social media platforms to censor any speech critical of Pfizer's COVID 19 vaccine safety and effectiveness. It should also be noted that Pfizer elected not to join the federal government's vaccine development program known as Operation Warp Speed and declined that development funding. When asked about that, Pfizer's CEO Albert Bourla said Pfizer did not participate in the program in order to, quote, liberate, end quote, Pfizer's scientists and to avoid government oversight of its vaccine development. He also said, quote, they want reports. I don't want to have any of that, end quote. Referring to they when he said they, he's referring to the federal government. Pfizer's misleading statements contributed to success in marketing its vaccine in Kansas. By February of 2024, Pfizer had delivered over 3, 300, 000 doses of its vaccine in the State of Kansas. This is this accounted for over 60% of all vaccine doses given in the State of Kansas. The suit is being filed today. And as I mentioned before, it is part of a multistate effort in which more suits may follow depending on Pfizer's reaction.

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

Kansas Attorney General Report Main Points https://trusttheevidence.substack.com/p/kansas-attorney-general-report

Kansas Attorney General Report The main points trusttheevidence.substack.com
jathorpmfm
Posted - July 26, 2024 at 3:59 AM
Saved - January 14, 2025 at 4:12 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe our fertility, pregnant women, and children are under attack through various strategies, which I see as pure evil. My upcoming book, co-authored with Celia Farber, will detail this agenda with accuracy. As a board-certified ObGyn with extensive experience, I've witnessed the consequences firsthand. My research highlights the dangers of COVID-19 vaccines in pregnancy, contradicting claims from government and medical organizations. Despite facing backlash and losing my job for speaking out, I prioritize truth over personal gain.

@jathorpmfm - James Thorp MD

Our fertility, pregnant women, preborns, newborns and children have been targeted using a vast array of strategies. It is pure evil. Our soon to be published book will demonstrate this evil agenda very accurately, truthfully and in great detail. I’m honored to have Celia Farber as a co-author. We are living in a globalist world truly having fulfilled Isaiah’s prophecy of 2800 years ago describing the “Covenant with Death” that is made in end times (Isaiah 28:25-18). This book is not a religious book. It is first authored by the most experienced (45 years), board certified ObGyn - Maternal Fetal Medicine Physician with more publications on COVID-19 vaccines in pregnancy than any other in this subspecialty. The 1st author-physician saw over 27,500 high risk pregnant patients between Jan 2019 to June 2023 and I witnessed the carnage with my own eyes. And just look at my research teams most recent publications on this exact same topic in just the last month. Learn some history on the Golden Rule in pregnancy and what lessons we should have learned from the diethylstilbestrol (DES) and thalidomide disasters in the last century. PART I https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202406.2062/v1 Are COVID-19 Vaccines in Pregnancy as Safe and Effective as the U.S. Government, Medical Organizations, and Pharmaceutical Industry Claim? Part I[v1] PART II. https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202407.0069/v1 Are COVID-19 Vaccines in Pregnancy as Safe and Effective as the U.S. Government, Medical Organizations, and Pharmaceutical Industry Claim? Part II[v1] I’ve been voraciously attacked because I know the data - the data from Pfizer and the data from our own government. The data from all over the world. I know how our evil government has orchestrated this disaster in the last 4 years: https://www.americaoutloud.news/author/jim-thorp-md-and-maggie-thorp/ My research team published the FOIA documenting the “Covenant with Death” that HHS / CDC made with the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) The American Board of Obstetrics & Gynecology (ABOG) and The Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM). They were bought off with tax payer’s dollars to threaten 60,000 ObGyn docs into pushing the lethal COVIDIAN CULTS protocols, even in the most vulnerable. ACOG ABOG SMFM are the globalists MOTHER BABY DEATH CULTISTS. They stand confident in killing as many as they can and pushing trans activism. https://www.americaoutloud.news/foia-reveals-troubling-relationship-between-hhs-cdc-the-american-college-of-obstetricians-and-gynecologists/ ABOG attempted to destroy me for calling them out along with ACOG and SMFM - destroy my career by removing my state license and ABOG board certifications in an exchange I had with former ABOG Executive Director George Wendel MD. https://www.abog.org/about-abog/news-announcements/2021/09/27/statement-regarding-dissemination-of-covid-19-misinformation But I fought back within weeks and published my OPEN LETTER TO ABOG published January 12, 2022 https://www.rodefshalom613.org/2022/01/dr-james-thorp-letter-to-american-board-obstetrics-gynecology-risk-covid19-vaccine-pregnancy/ Interestingly Wendel resigned after I sent all the ABOG officers that letter an published it for the whole world to witness the insane death cult policies they have been payed off to push. 98 pages of proof that ABOG WAS DEAD WRONG including data & experts globally and including the government’s own VAERS data. Read it! It included over 1000 peer reviewed medical journal references in just 12 months after the C19 jab rollout documenting severe injuries and deaths after the jab. There are now over 3500 such articles published on the react C19 website. Home - React19 And these delusional doctors think it’s safe in pregnancy. I was terminated from SSM Health for “no cause” being regaled as a “model physician” for our system by SSM HEALTH CEO but they lied. They fired me because I testified in the US senate and spoke out on many high profile platforms like Tucker Carlson and others. SSM HEALTH took $306.9 MILLION of bribe monies from the government. https://www.americaoutloud.news/covid-19-government-relief-funds-turned-the-healthcare-industry-on-its-head/ They tried to pay me $100,000 hush money signing an NDA - I told them NO. The truth is more important to me than my job, or money, or my life. @elonmusk

Maggie Thorp JD and Jim Thorp MD, Author at America Out Loud News Maggie Thorp is a commercial litigation attorney and legal writer-commentator whose law practice has involved both corporate bad faith and corporate fraud. She is licensed to practice law in both the State of Florida and State of Illinois, and has practiced in both the Northern and Middle U.S. District Courts of Florida, as well as before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit. Most recently, she returned to academia to pursue a Master’s Degree at Duke Divinity School just prior to the onset of the pandemic, obtaining her degree in 2022. In addition to the practice of law, Maggie currently writes about the ethical and legal implications of the modern medical-industrial complex, including the widespread corruption of US government and the censorship of free speech. Dr. Jim Thorp is a Board-Certified Obstetrician Gynecologist and Maternal Fetal Medicine Physician with over 43 years of obstetrical experience. While serving as a clinician his entire career, he has also been active in clinical research, with approximately 200 publications. Dr. Thorp has seen over 22,800 high-risk pregnancies in the past three years. He has served as a reviewer for major medical journals, has served on the Board of Directors for the Society of Maternal Fetal Medicine, and also served the American Board of Obstetrics & Gynecology. He served in the United States Air Force as an Obstetrician Gynecologist, having been awarded a Health Professions Scholarship for his medical school education. Dr. Thorp testified in the US Senate under the Bush administration in 2003 for his expertise in treating the fetus as a patient with in-utero therapies. Most recently, Dr. Thorp has focused his research efforts on the COVID-19 pandemic and published several peer-reviewed scientific publications documenting the dangers of the vaccine in women of reproductive age and in pregnancy. His publications demonstrate that the COVID-19 “vaccination” experiment has been one of the greatest disasters in the history of medicine. americaoutloud.news
FOIA Reveals Troubling Relationship between HHS/CDC & ACOG ACOG jumped on board as a founding member of COVID-19 Community Corps – ultimately receiving millions. If it sounds like government capture of ACOG – it is. Even more disturbing, CDC is surreptitiously working through ACOG, exploiting ACOG’s authority and sway, to influence not only doctors and patients – but a host of others – including public health entities and... americaoutloud.news
Dr. James Thorp's Letter to the American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology on the Risks of the Covid-19 Vaccine in Pregnancy - Rodef Shalom 613 The following 16 page letter with 1,019 peer-reviewed references about the dangers of the Covid-19 vaccine was written by Dr. James Thorp, OB-GYN and Maternal Fetal Medicine Specialist, to the American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology in response to their Statement Regarding Dissemination of COVID-19 Misinformation.   January 12, 2022 Dear Dr. George Wendel andRead More rodefshalom613.org
COVID-19 Relief Funds Turned Healthcare Industry on Its Head With the government as their savior, did healthcare systems become all too eager to jump on board with the CDC narrative that the vaccines were safe and stopped transmission? Yet, the CDC’s “safe and effective” narrative would crash and burn, proving to be false as early as the summer of 2021. After being thrown into a state of chaos by what can only be described as totalitarian tactics of the U.S. government... americaoutloud.news
newstart_2024
Posted - September 1, 2024 at 6:48 PM
Saved - September 1, 2024 at 7:36 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe in the golden rule of pregnancy: never use unproven drugs or vaccines. This principle was violated recently, particularly regarding vaccinations for pregnant women. Historically, new vaccines like polio were not administered to pregnant mothers, and this practice has been discouraged. Pfizer's post-marketing analysis revealed concerning results, with 28 out of 29 pregnancies reportedly lost after vaccination. This raises serious questions about the safety of such interventions during pregnancy.

@newstart_2024 - Camus

Dr. Chris Shoemaker: "The Golden rule of pregnancy, never use an unproven drug in pregnancy and never vaccinate in pregnancy...that golden rule was broken. The last people that should get new drugs, unproven drugs or vaccines should be pregnant women and the fetus inside them. They should be 10, 15 years out. If you've got a wonderful new vaccine to use. Polio would not have been given to pregnant mothers in the early days. Not a chance. And actually has been discouraged ever since. You don't vaccinate pregnant mothers. It's medical malpractice... Well Pfizer knew the results just as things were rolling out. They did a post marketing analysis and in their post marketing analysis there was about 300 people that they didn't tell you what happened to the other 270 or so...but they did give the answer for 29 pregnant mothers...and the published data by Pfizer showed that of the 29 pregnancies that they were willing to say what the results were and the others that they hid, 28 out of 29 lost the pregnancy...97% of the fetuses were lost...50 to 67% of pregnancies while the woman has received the vaccine while pregnant, 50 to 67% of those pregnancies are lost either early or late..."

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker asserts the "golden rule of pregnancy" is to never use unproven drugs or vaccines, a rule they claim was broken during COVID. They allege that Pfizer's post-marketing analysis of approximately 29 pregnant mothers showed a 97% pregnancy loss. They claim real-world data from hospital systems indicates a 50% to 67% pregnancy loss rate when women are vaccinated during pregnancy, leading to obscene stillbirth numbers and early pregnancy losses. The speaker attributes these losses to the toxic spike protein from vaccines crossing the placenta and harming the fetus. They state that vaccinating pregnant women was a mistake based on lies and that it is now known to be unsafe, especially for mothers and their children.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The golden rule of pregnancy, never use an unproven drug in pregnancy and to never vaccinate in pregnancy, never. So and somehow never went away, never went away during COVID. That golden rule was broken. The last people that should get new drugs, unproven drugs or vaccines should be pregnant women and the fetus inside them. They should be 10, 15 years out if you've got a wonderful new vaccine to use. Polio would not have been given to pregnant mothers in the early days. Not a chance. And actually has been discouraged ever since. You don't vaccinate pregnant mothers. It's medical malpractice. Why have we allowed ourselves to do a medical malpractice ostensibly recommending it? And what has been the result? What has been the result? Well, Pfizer knew the results just as things were rolling out. They did a post marketing analysis. And in their post marketing analysis, there was a specific there was about 300 people that they didn't tell you what happened to the other 270 or so. They didn't give the answer back, but they did give the answer for 29 pregnant mothers. And the 29 pregnant mothers that they gave the answer to what happened to the pregnancy. And it's published. It's part of the 75,000 pages of Pfizer data. And the published data by Pfizer showed that of the 29 pregnancies that they were willing to say what the results were and the others that they hid, 20 out of sorry, 28 out of 29 lost the pregnancy. A horrific number. 97% of the fetuses were lost of those 29 that they were willing to tell us about. Of course, they weren't really willing to tell us about it because they thought that these data would be hidden for 75 years. But the truth, when Doctor. Naomi Wolf and others got to the truth, is that this cache of dear families who lost the ability to have this child in a ratio like that, 97% in that group lost. The actual real world data, the real world data where it's really being spoken out and proven hospital systems in Florida, hospital systems in other parts of the states that are being honest about it show that 50% to 67% of pregnancies while the woman has received the vaccine while pregnant, 50% to 67% of those pregnancies are lost either early or late. Incredible numbers. Anyone in the obstetrical units really knows the truth. They've seen stillbirth numbers that are obscene. They've seen early pregnancy losses, extra bleeding, spontaneous bleedings and spontaneous abortion losses that have happened that are obscene numbers. And this is what happens when you break the golden rule of pregnancy. Do never break the golden rule of pregnancy. Do not vaccinate and especially do not vaccinate with a toxic spike protein into a viable human who's only this big, a little viable human that's only this big and nanoparticles take the toxic stuff across through the placenta and into the cord and into the baby and into the baby's brain. And the mother received the shot when the baby was 3 months old inside her body because society was telling her, That's the way you can protect yourself. That's the way you can protect grandma. You just do it too. We were lied to. We were lied to. We didn't know if it was safe or not. We now know absolutely that it's not safe. And one of the biggest evidences that it's not safe was in this highly risked population, mothers and the children within them.

@newstart_2024 - Camus

Credit: @CShoemakerMD https://drshoemakercovidtruth.com/

toobaffled
Posted - February 20, 2025 at 1:37 PM
Saved - February 20, 2025 at 6:49 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A new study reveals that Moderna's mRNA vaccine crosses the placenta within an hour, accumulates in fetal organs, produces Spike proteins, and remains in fetal tissues post-birth. This provides the first in vivo evidence of mRNA vaccines affecting the fetus. I believe these genetic injections pose risks for pregnant women and their babies, urging the CDC to reconsider its stance on the safety of COVID vaccines during pregnancy. The long-term effects on unborn babies are unknown, and administering these shots without adequate safety data seems reckless.

@toobaffled - “Sudden And Unexpected”

Study Confirms mRNA Shots Cross the Placenta & Reach the Fetus 💉A new peer-reviewed study shows that Moderna's mRNA vaccine (mRNA-1273) crosses the placenta in just 1 hour, accumulates in fetal organs, makes Spike proteins, and stays in fetal tissues after birth. This is the first in vivo proof that mRNA shots directly impact the fetus. It’s clear: these genetic injections are risky for pregnant women and their babies. The CDC needs to REVOKE its claim that COVID vaccines are “safe” during pregnancy. The long-term effects on unborn babies? We have no idea, but pushing these shots without proper safety data is reckless. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2162253125000435

mRNA-1273 is placenta-permeable and immunogenic in the fetus COVID-19 mRNA vaccines are generally recognized as safe for gestational administration. However, their transplacental pharmacokinetics remains obscure… sciencedirect.com
MdBreathe
Posted - March 22, 2025 at 10:37 PM
Saved - March 23, 2025 at 2:18 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Pfizer's post-marketing surveillance revealed alarming statistics: an 81% miscarriage rate, a 5-fold increase in stillbirths, an 8-fold rise in neonatal deaths, and a 13% rate of breastfeeding complications in newborns of vaccinated mothers.

@MdBreathe - Mary Talley Bowden MD

Pfizer's post-marketing surveillance analysis showed a miscarriage rate of 81%, a 5-fold increase in stillbirths, an 8-fold increase in neonatal deaths, and a 13% incidence of breastfeeding complications in newborns whose mothers received the COVID shots.

@MdBreathe - Mary Talley Bowden MD

Link to article: https://publichealthpolicyjournal.com/are-covid-19-vaccines-in-pregnancy-as-safe-and-effective-as-the-medical-industrial-complex-claim-part-i/

Are COVID-19 Vaccines in Pregnancy as Safe and Effective as the Medical Industrial Complex Claim? Part I - Science, Public Health Policy and the Law Introduction: In Part I of this three-part series, we report a retrospective, population-based cohort study assessing rates of adverse events (AEs) in publichealthpolicyjournal.com
ValerieAnne1970
Posted - May 9, 2025 at 7:03 AM
Saved - May 10, 2025 at 12:36 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m alarmed by the lack of discussion surrounding the impact of COVID vaccines on pregnancy. Recent documents reveal that a significant number of in utero babies died after pregnant women received the Pfizer vaccine, with reports indicating an 82% miscarriage rate among vaccinated women. Despite this, there is immense pressure on pregnant women to get vaccinated, even though the vaccine's safety has not been tested. The U.S. also has the highest infant and maternal mortality rates among developed countries, raising serious concerns about these practices.

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

"Nobody's Talking About What The COVID Vaccines Do To Pregnancy...There Are Now Death Doulas To Deliver Dead Babies." "Midwives Are Creating A New Field Which Only Deliver Dead Babies." "Covid Was An Absolute Nightmare In Terms Of Obstetrics, Gynecology, Labor & Delivery." A recently released confidential document reveals that a startling majority of in utero babies died after pregnant women were injected with the Pfizer vaccine. Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency (PHMPT) requested documents related to vaccine licensing via a Freedom of Information Act Request. Pfizer's own post marketing documents revealed 82% of vaccinated pregnant women suffered miscarriages... "Among the 34 pregnancies known, 28 fetuses died in utero or upon birth." Every pregnant woman is pressured to get vaccinated, even though the vaccine hasn't been tested for safety. Vaccine Package Insert Section: 13.1 Carcinogenesis, Mutagenesis, Impairment of Fertility... Line 13.1 of every single vaccine insert states: “…has not been evaluated for carcinogenic or mutagenic potential, or for impairment of fertility.” The United States holds the highest infant mortality rate & the highest maternal mortality rate of all developed industrialized countries. 👇Freedom Of Information Act Request👇 https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/IR0546-FDA-Pfizer-Approval-FINAL.pdf 👇Pfizer Covid Vaccine Post Marketing Reports👇 https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/reissue_5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf 👇Court Documents Reveal 82% Miscarriage Rate👇 https://www.operationrescue.org/court-ordered-release-of-pfizer-document-reveals-82-97-of-vaccinated-pregnant-women-lost-their-babies/ Speakers: Dr Suzanne Humphries, MD & Joe Rogan Video: @hazardboysmedia

Video Transcript AI Summary
COVID has allegedly led to athletes dropping dead and caused cardiomyopathies and pulmonary emboli. Newborn babies are now born without stem cells, and there are "death doulas" to deliver dead babies, a field that purportedly didn't exist before. COVID was a "nightmare" for obstetrics, gynecology, labor, and delivery. Some midwives don't want to return to work due to vaccine-related birth problems damaging their reputations. If the COVID vaccine causes blood clots, it will affect the placenta, which is primarily blood vessels. No studies showed the vaccine was safe for pregnant women, yet it was recommended. Influenza and pertussis vaccines, also recommended for pregnant women, have not been tested for carcinogenicity or mutagenicity. These vaccines change the immune reactivity of the infant. The "sound bite lie" spreads faster than the truth, and those who question the science are labeled as crazy.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: For COVID, we know look. You've seen the athletes dropping dead. You know about the cardiomyopathies and the pulmonary emboli and and all that kind of thing. Nobody's talking about the stem cells that the newborn babies are born without. Nobody's talking about the fact that there are now death doulas to deliver dead babies. Like, that wasn't even a thing before. But I've got a friend that's a midwife who tells me that they are now creating a new field, which are midwives that only deliver dead babies. They do nothing else. They didn't need that before. COVID was an absolute nightmare in terms of obstetrics, gynecology, labor, and delivery. A lot of midwives that that got done and and because they didn't get vaccinated, they don't even wanna go back now that they can go back because they don't wanna have their good reputations of a % of, you know, normal births being dealing with what's being dealt with today in terms of the birth problems that are happening because of the actual vaccine itself. It caused look. If it causes problems and blood clots in our circulation, what do you think it's gonna do to a placenta that is pretty much all blood vessel? That's all it is. It's like a big blood vessel sandwich is what it is. Speaker 1: And there was no studies that showed that it was safe to give to pregnant women, but yet they were saying that. Speaker 0: Well, there's look. Every influenza vaccine pack package insert says it's never been tested for carcinogenicity or mutagenicity in pregnant women, yet it's recommended every year for every pregnant woman and every time they get pregnant or not. It's recommended. Same with the pertussis vaccine. Give it to pregnant women. Never mind that it changes the immune the immune reactivity of the infant. Nobody talks about these things. This is what I say when, you know, it's like the truth is so much more complicated than the sound bite lie. The sound bite lie is what gets around the world three times. Speaker 1: The science is settled. Speaker 0: Science is settled. There's no debate needed because the likes of me are so crazy and, you know, whacked out and, you know, when I'm trying to destroy the the good the good order of the the general public, things Speaker 1: like hands. Speaker 0: But oh, that's a good one. I always love that one. Speaker 1: Yeah. It's a fun one.
Court Ordered Release of Pfizer Document Reveals 82% - 97% of Vaccinated Pregnant Women Lost their Babies - Operation Rescue By Anne Reed A recently released confidential document reveals that a startling majority of in utero babies died after pregnant women were injected with the Pfizer vaccine. Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency (PHMPT) requested documents related to vaccine licensing via a Freedom of Information Act Request, then sued the Food and Drug Administration […] operationrescue.org
JoshWalkos
Posted - June 3, 2025 at 2:20 AM
Saved - August 25, 2025 at 12:14 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The FDA has approved Moderna's new COVID vaccine, mNEXSPIKE®, but it was tested against Spikevax, not a placebo, raising ethical concerns. This approval, based on a Phase 3 trial with over 11,000 participants, means we can't accurately assess safety or risk compared to doing nothing. The approval process seems designed to obscure potential side effects, as both vaccines share similar adverse reactions. Future trials are planned, including for pregnant women, but the core question remains unaddressed: what happens if no vaccine is administered?

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

🧵THREAD: The FDA Just Approved Moderna’s New COVID Shot, mNEXSPIKE® But there’s a catch, they never tested it against a placebo. They tested it against the other COVID shot. Why? Because “ethics.” Here’s what they don’t want you to notice.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

Moderna’s new vaccine, mNEXSPIKE®, was just greenlit by the FDA on May 31, 2025 for Adults 65+ and ages 12–64 with risk factors. According to the FDA, the approval is based on a Phase 3 trial (NCT05815498) with ~11,400 participants. But they didn’t test it against saline. They tested it against Spikevax®, their other COVID shot. Yes, really. Source: https://www.cnbc.com/amp/2025/06/01/fda-approves-modernas-new-lower-dose-covid-19-vaccine.html

FDA approves Moderna's next-generation Covid vaccine for adults 65 or older The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has approved Moderna's next-generation Covid-19 vaccine for everyone aged 65 and above, the company said on Saturday. cnbc.com

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

Package insert: https://www.fda.gov/media/186738/download?attachment

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

Moderna’s press release boasts: “mNEXSPIKE was non-inferior to Spikevax in preventing COVID-19… with a 9.3% higher relative vaccine efficacy.” But let’s be real, what they’re saying is: 💉 Our new mRNA shot is about as mediocre as the old one. Source: https://investors.modernatx.com/news/news-details/2025/Moderna-Receives-U-S--FDA-Approval-for-COVID-19-Vaccine-mNEXSPIKE/

Page not found Deliver the greatest possible impact to people through mRNA medicines. investors.modernatx.com

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

This is how pharma plays the game: Once a shot is approved, even under emergency powers, they call it “standard of care.” Then they use that product as the control group in new trials. That way, no placebo is ever used again. Science™.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

Why does this matter? Because it makes it impossible to measure: Absolute safety Absolute risk of adverse events How it compares to doing nothing Every shot gets tested against another shot. It’s a never-ending loop of relative bullshit. The official line is this: “Using a placebo would be unethical because we have an effective vaccine.” So you’re saying it’s unethical to compare a new vaccine to nothing because you’ve already approved one… based on incomplete, rushed trials? That’s not ethics. That’s regulatory sleight of hand.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

The reason regulators and pharmaceutical companies often cite for not using a true placebo (i.e., saline injection) once a vaccine has been authorized is that it would be “unethical to withhold a known effective treatment” from participants, especially during a public health emergency. “Standard of Care” https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abf5084?utm

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

This shell game means we never get real answers about how many people are harmed by these products compared to doing nothing at all. Remember: Spikevax (the control) is no saint. It’s associated with: •Myocarditis •Pericarditis •Neuropathy •Blood clots •Menstrual disruption •Bell’s Palsy •Sudden unexplained deaths So using it as a “placebo” masks harm in the new shot. If both vaccines cause fatigue, fever, myalgia, and heart inflammation, then comparing the two just tells us which one hurts slightly less. It doesn’t tell us whether either one is safe. This is how you bury side effects under statistical fog.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

From the FDA’s own label: https://www.fda.gov/media/186738/download?attachment

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

Totally normal, they say. They also admit that it doesn’t protect “all people” who inject into their bodies. “Vaccination with mNEXSPIKE may not protect all people who receive the vaccine.” Translation: we approved this on the same “trust us” logic we used in 2020. Source: https://investors.modernatx.com/news/news-details/2025/Moderna-Receives-U-S--FDA-Approval-for-COVID-19-Vaccine-mNEXSPIKE/

Page not found Deliver the greatest possible impact to people through mRNA medicines. investors.modernatx.com

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

Oh, and they’re requiring Moderna to run more trials after it’s approved. Including one for pregnant women… due in 2032. Yeah. They approved it now, and they’ll figure out if it harms fetuses later. Source: https://www.fda.gov/media/186740/download?attachment https://t.co/ZpMrlqDl16

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

Another upcoming study will test whether adults aged 50–64 even benefit from vaccination at all. They’re only now asking whether middle-aged adults even need it. But don’t worry, it’s already approved. https://t.co/4twgf2qxt4

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

They rig the trials, skip the control group, blur the data, and rubber-stamp it all under the guise of “ethics.” And if you question it? You’re “anti-vax” or “dangerous.” This is Moderna’s new business model: → Approve a reformulated shot every year → Compare it only to last year’s shot → Call it science → Sell it to the government → Exempt from liability A pharmaceutical perpetual motion machine.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

By using Spikevax as the comparator, Moderna and the FDA avoid having to ask the only question that matters: What happens when you do nothing? And that’s the question they’re terrified to answer. Because if you knew the true baseline for adverse events, efficacy, and long-term outcomes, you’d realize their products are a shell game. The ethics they invoke are not about protecting you. They’re about protecting the narrative And the narrative must never be placebo-controlled.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

Call it what it is: mNEXSPIKE wasn’t tested against a placebo. It was tested against another mRNA shot riddled with side effects, so they could say: It’s just as bad as the last one. Approved. Welcome to science in 2025.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

If you made it this far don’t forget to give me a follow and continue down the rabbit hole. 👇🏻

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

Here is a list of all of my threads so far for ease of access. I appreciate the support, more to come. Thread Topics 🧵 1. COVID-19 Vaccines 💉 2. VAERS📉 3. The PCR “Test”🧪 4. Masks 😷 5. Lockdowns 🔒 6. mRNA Approval for Kids 💉 7. Post 💉 Autopsies 8. Excess Death💀

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

@Trinityaudiobot turn this into an audio version.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

@Trinityaudiobot I’ll just add this. Look at what NEX means in Latin… https://t.co/arOTYjqu67

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

@Smalling5Jerry Sure does. I bet their excuse will be that the the study design was created prior to this announcement.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

@TheNoseKnoes A machine even knows it’s unethical.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

@EvilEmbryo We are the animals.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

@Cosmic_SnG Shut the fuck you little bitch.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

Spikevax has an ARR of 1.15% and NNV of 87. So 87 individuals need to be vaccinated with Spikevax to prevent one symptomatic COVID-19 case. However with the new one, without a placebo group, calculating the ARR and NNV directly is not feasible. They know that but I’d surmise it’s about the same as the last.

@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi

@Johnny_alani @Rollup_News Never seen this one, I like it. Thanks.

ValerieAnne1970
Posted - June 21, 2025 at 7:38 AM
Saved - June 21, 2025 at 10:53 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared concerns about the COVID vaccine's impact on pregnant women, citing a study that suggested an 82% miscarriage rate among vaccinated women in their first trimester, a stark contrast to the 12.6% reported in a widely cited study. I believe the government and medical organizations misled pregnant women through emotional manipulation, prioritizing a narrative of safety over scientific integrity. My own research identified numerous adverse pregnancy outcomes linked to the vaccine, raising alarms about its safety and the potential harm to both mothers and their unborn children.

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

"82% of COVID Vaccinated Pregnant Women Suffered Miscarriages." Dr James Thorp, OB-GYN "Billion Dollar Marketing Campaigns Pressured & Guilted Pregnant Women To Get COVID Vaccines That Caused The Death Of Their Unborn Child." "The Same Fatality Rate Of RU-486 Abortion Pill." The government-controlled medical-industrial complex deliberately targeted pregnant women & their unborn children, who are among our most vulnerable populations. This campaign was driven by two calculated reasons. First, women are the primary decision-makers for healthcare across the human lifespan. Second, convincing pregnant women that the vaccine was safe would imply it was safe for everyone. This campaign was not grounded in biological science but in behavioral manipulation. The federal government outsourced psychological operations to non-governmental organizations. These entities disseminated emotionally charged & misleading messages, falsely assuring pregnant women that the vaccines were proven safe & essential for maternal & fetal health. The Shimabukuro study, published in the New England Journal of Medicine on April 21, 2021, claimed a miscarriage rate of 12.6 percent. Shimabukuro & colleagues falsified & hid the raw data which was discovered thru a FOIA request. The raw data revealed an 82% miscarriage rate for women vaccinated in the first trimester, a figure comparable to the effects of chemical abortion drugs. This deception was not accidental...it was targeted & intentional. CDC Director Rochelle Walensky & New England Journal of Medicine Editor-in-Chief Eric Rubin promoted this narrative in the same journal edition, which was riddled with conflicts of interest. At least 6 studies from the CDC, FDA & Pfizer revealed major breaches in safety signals for COVID-19 vaccines in pregnancy. These findings were ignored. Independent researchers who published conflicting data faced censorship, persecution & threats to their medical licenses. Dr. Thorp himself was targeted. On February 8, 2025, his team published a peer-reviewed study in Science, Public Health Policy, and the Law. The study identified 37 adverse pregnancy outcomes significantly associated with COVID-19 vaccines, including miscarriage, stillbirth, birth defects, preterm birth & newborn death. Further evidence shows that the COVID-19 vaccine crosses the placenta, producing spike protein in the fetus & uterus. Animal studies indicate that mRNA vaccines destroy 60% of the ovarian reserve in rats. This catastrophic public health failure was financed with taxpayer dollars and channeled through federal agencies to medical organizations. 👇Freedom Of Information Act Request👇 https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/IR0546-FDA-Pfizer-Approval-FINAL.pdf 👇Pfizer Covid Vaccine Post Marketing Reports👇 https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/reissue_5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf 👇COVID Shots Destroy 60% Ovarian Reserve👇 https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/breaking-covid-19-mrna-shots-destroy Speaker: Dr James Thorp, MD @jathorpmfm

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims the Shimabukuro study published in the New England Journal of Medicine on 04/21/2021, misrepresented miscarriage rates, reporting 12.6% when raw data allegedly showed 82% in women vaccinated during the first trimester. The speaker alleges conflicts of interest and misrepresentations by CDC Director Rochelle Walensky and Journal Editor in Chief Eric Rubin in publications intended to coerce pregnant women into taking vaccines. The speaker asserts that subsequent studies claiming vaccine safety during pregnancy are compromised by biased funding, institutional mandates, and threats to medical licenses. Pharmaceutical companies allegedly paid $1,060,000,000 to reviewers at leading medical journals between 2020 and 2022, corrupting the peer review process. Safety signals were allegedly ignored in at least six studies from CDC, FDA, and Pfizer. The speaker states their team published a study on 02/08/2025, identifying 37 adverse pregnancy outcomes significantly associated with COVID-19 vaccines. They cite a study documenting the vaccine traversing the placenta and producing spike protein in the placenta and uterus, and animal studies revealing destruction of ovarian reserve. The speaker urges halting funding to organizations like ACOG and SMFM and ending promotional campaigns for mRNA therapies in pregnant women.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This deception was institutionalized in the now infamous Shimabukuro study published on 04/21/2021, in the digital version of the New England Journal of Medicine. 21 authors claimed the miscarriage rate was twelve point six percent, but the raw data revealed an eighty two percent miscarriage rate in women vaccinated during the first trimester. This figure mirrors the effects of chemical abortion drugs such as RU-four eighty six. Also, in the same journal edition, on the same day, an op ed appeared by CDC Director Rochelle Walensky and Journal Editor in Chief Eric Rubin. These publications were riddled with conflicts of interest and deliberate misrepresentations intended to coerce pregnant women into taking vaccines. Subsequent studies have also claimed that COVID-nineteen vaccines are safe and effective during pregnancy and have been rebuked by respected researchers. These publications are fundamentally compromised by serious conflicts of interest ranging from biased funding sources and institutional mandates and even threats to their medical licenses and board certifications. Between 2020 and 2022, pharmaceutical companies paid $1,060,000,000 to reviewers at leading medical journals, the New England Journal of Medicine, JAMA, Lancet, and BMJ. Thus corrupting the peer review process. At least six existing studies, three from CDC, FDA and two from Pfizer revealed major breaches in safety signals for COVID-nineteen vaccines in pregnancy. These findings were ignored. Conversely, countless independent researchers with no conflicts of interest published findings that contradicted the false narratives and the pharmaceutical industry narratives only to be rewarded by persecution, censorship, and threats to their medical licenses and board certifications. This is not hypothetical. It happened to me. On 02/08/2025, our team of researchers published a peer reviewed study in science, public health policy, the law. We identified thirty seven adverse pregnancy outcomes significantly associated with COVID-nineteen vaccine, including miscarriage, stillbirth, birth defects, cervical insufficiency, premature rupture membranes, preterm birth, and death of the newborn. Lynn and colleagues in a major journal publication documented that the COVID-nineteen vaccine traverses the placenta, enters the fetal blood, and bioactively produces spike protein in the placenta and the lining of the uterus. Recently, animal studies revealed the mRNA COVID vaccine causes the destruction of 60% of the ovarian reserve in rats. This catastrophic public health failure was financed with taxpayer dollars and channeled through federal agencies to medical gatekeepers such as the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists the American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology and the Society for Maternal Fetal Medicine, SMFM. These organizations have abandoned their ethics and responsibilities to physicians and patients and must be held accountable. I urge the government to immediately halt all funding to these entities and to end every promotional campaign that coerces or recommends experimental mRNA therapies to pregnant women. This must stop now. Thank you.
BREAKING: COVID-19 mRNA Shots Destroy Over 60% of Women’s Non-Renewable Egg Supply New study finds rats injected intramuscularly with human-equivalent mRNA doses suffered irreversible loss of primordial follicles — the foundation of fertility. thefocalpoints.com
newstart_2024
Posted - October 13, 2025 at 6:46 PM
Saved - November 2, 2025 at 11:37 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I recount Naomi Wolf’s claim that Pfizer and the FDA conducted a massive, non-consensual experiment. I allege they knew vaccines waned by Dec 2020, lied publicly, and hid adverse events, including deaths; that Moderna’s 100 mcg dose was too toxic; that pregnancy outcomes were misrepresented; and that lipid nanoparticles cross membranes, with PEG in breast milk, signaling a premeditated betrayal against the young and pregnant.

@newstart_2024 - Camus

Naomi Wolf: Pfizer & the FDA engaged in a massive, non-consensual experiment on humanity. The internal documents, marked "FDA Confidential," reveal a conscious, murderous cover-up. They knew. And they lied. 1/ THEY KNEW THE VACCINES FAILED By December 2020, one month after rollout, Pfizer & the FDA knew the vaccines had "waning efficacy" & provided limited protection. The public wasn't told until April 2021, after millions believed they were "completely protected" as promised. 2/ THEY LIED ABOUT WHERE THE VACCINE GOES They claimed the mRNA stayed in the deltoid muscle. They knew this was false. Internal data showed lipid nanoparticles enter the bloodstream within 48 hours, accumulating in critical organs: the liver, adrenals, lymph nodes, and ovaries. 3/ THEY HID THE DEADLY TOLL Pfizer tracked 42,000+ adverse events & 1,200+ deaths within months of rollout, including 4 deaths on the day of injection. They stopped collecting reports. They knew in May 2021 that 35 teenagers had heart damage; the FDA waited until August to warn the public, denying parents informed consent for months. 4/ THEY KNEW MODERNA'S DOSE WAS TOXIC Pfizer's internal assessment found Moderna's 100-microgram dose was dangerously "reactogenic" & had far more adverse events. They dropped this dose internally but never warned the public. Millions received a dose they knew was too high. 5/ THE BABY DIE-OFF This is the most horrific revelation. The "safe for pregnant women" claim was based on a 42-day study of 44 rats by Pfizer/BioNTech shareholders. The reality in their documents is chilling: 270 women got pregnant during trials; records for 230 are missing. Of the 36 tracked pregnancies, 28 ended with lost babies. 20 were fetal deaths. Global data confirms a signal: Neonatal deaths in Ontario skyrocketed from a baseline of 5-6 to 86 in one period. Scotland saw newborn deaths double. An Israeli hospital reported a 34% higher rate of stillbirths among the vaccinated. 6/ WHY IS THIS HAPPENING? The lipid nanoparticles traverse the amniotic membrane, exposing the fetus. Post-birth, polyethylene glycol (a petroleum byproduct) is found in the breast milk of vaccinated mothers. Their documents report suppressed lactation, blue-green breast milk (indicating a blood issue), and babies with GI distress, agitation, and failure to thrive. One nursing baby died with liver inflammation. This was not a mistake. It was a coordinated, premeditated betrayal. They sacrificed the young, the pregnant, and the healthy for a narrative. The evidence is now undeniable.

HopeRising19
Posted - March 9, 2026 at 6:58 PM
Saved - March 10, 2026 at 12:08 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I read a Würzburg study (PLOS ONE) testing 9 placentas. In 2 placentas vaccinal mRNA was detected; all nine were negative for SARS-CoV-2 RNA. One case: mother had 3 Pfizer doses (2 pre-preg, 1 in 2nd trimester) plus mild infection at 36 weeks; vaccinal mRNA found in decidual surface cells. Another case: mother had 2 Moderna doses pre-pregnancy; vaccinal RNA in villous endothelial cells. Long-term implications unknown.

@HopeRising19 - NZ and the MRNA

VACCINAL RNA DETECTED IN CELLS LINING THE PLACENTAL BLOOD VESSELS THAT INTERFACE WITH FETAL CIRCULATION A brand new study from University Hospital of Würzburg PLoS One 21(3): e0344185. Key findings pertaining to the ability of vaccinal spike protein bio distributing through the placenta, to developing fetus: 9 placenta's were tested, and in two placentas VACCINAL mRNA was detected. All 9 of the placentas were negative for Sars Cov II RNA (e.g. this was vaccinal RNA NOT Infection RNA) One placenta belonged to a mother who: *took 3 doses of Pfizer Comirnaty - 2 pre pregnancy and 1 during second trimester, followed by a mild Covid infection at 36 weeks gestation. *Vaccinal mRNA was detected in decidual surface cells (maternal side, part of the uterine lining interfacing with the placenta) One placenta belonged to a mother who: *took 2 doses of Moderna mRNA 1273 (the Moderna Covid vax) PRE PREGNANCY ONLY. No Covid infection at any time. *Vaccinal RNA dectected in villous endothelial cells (fetal side, lining the blood vessels in placental villi that interface with fetal circulation) VACCINAL RNA DETECTED IN CELLS LINING THE PLACENTAL BLOOD VESSELS THAT INTERFACE WITH FETAL CIRCULATION The authors interpret these findings as evidence that modRNA from mRNA vaccines can be taken up or transferred into placental cells, potentially leading to local production of spike protein Long term implications for future health of children who have been exposed to vaccinal mRNA through fetal blood circulation? Unknown (study link in comments) Video shows the last ACIP meeting, during discussion of BIODISTRIBUTION of LNP's and vaccinal mRNA

Video Transcript AI Summary
For biodistribution, Pfizer did not use the actual spike mRNA product in their studies. Instead, they substituted in a luciferase reporter mRNA packaged in the same lipid nanoparticles. This approach allowed them to track where the mRNA traveled in rodents. The studies showed that following intramuscular injection, most of the mRNA remained at the site of injection, but there was also notable levels detected in the liver. Despite the limitations of this approach, which can underestimate low level or transient distributions to other tissues, it nevertheless showed that the vaccine components do not remain confined to the injection site. Next slide. For Moderna, no dedicated biodistribution study was performed with the COVID mRNA itself. Instead, data was provided from a surrogate product, a CMV mRNA, mRNA-sixteen 47, which used the same lipid nanoparticle formulation. In their rat study, after intramuscular injections, high levels of the mRNA were detected at the injection site, but also in multiple organs such as the draining lymph nodes, spleen, eye, and liver. Lower levels were also found across a wide range of tissues, including the heart, lungs, testes, and brain. Importantly, this study clearly showed that the mRNA can cross the blood brain barrier. Next slide. Consistent with what is seen in animal studies, the vaccine mRNA and its spike protein have been detected in humans across multiple tissues, including blood, lymph nodes, the heart, and even the brain. These findings make it clear that the mRNA does not remain confined to the injection site. Importantly, persistence has been documented well beyond the initial hours or days, lasting weeks in some tissues, and in certain studies detectable for many months. Next slide. To summarize the biodistribution data, it's important to note that neither Moderna nor Pfizer used their actual commercial mRNA vaccine products in the preclinical biodistribution studies. Instead, they relied on surrogate construct packaged in same or similar lipid nanoparticles. Second, the results of those studies show that the mRNA and lipid nanoparticles were not confined to the injection site. Systemic distribution was observed with evidence that the mRNA can cross the blood brain barrier. Consistent with these findings, studies in humans have confirmed that vaccine mRNA can be detected in multiple tissues, including lymph nodes, the heart, the central nervous system, and blood. Finally, persistence is not just short term. In some reports, mRNA has been detected for weeks to months, and in certain cases as long as seven zero six days post vaccination. Taken together, these data highlight that biodistribution is broad and persistence is longer than initially expected, raising important questions and concerns for ongoing research and safety monitoring.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: For biodistribution, Pfizer did not use the actual spike mRNA product in their studies. Instead, they substituted in a luciferase reporter mRNA packaged in the same lipid nanoparticles. This approach allowed them to track where the mRNA traveled in rodents. The studies showed that following intramuscular injection, most of the mRNA remained at the site of injection, but there was also notable levels detected in the liver. Despite the limitations of this approach, which can underestimate low level or transient distributions to other tissues, it nevertheless showed that the vaccine components do not remain confined to the injection site. Next slide. For Moderna, no dedicated biodistribution study was performed with the COVID mRNA itself. Instead, data was provided from a surrogate product, a CMV mRNA, mRNA-sixteen 47, which used the same lipid nanoparticle formulation. In their rat study, after intramuscular injections, high levels of the mRNA were detected at the injection site, but also in multiple organs such as the draining lymph nodes, spleen, eye, and liver. Lower levels were also found across a wide range of tissues, including the heart, lungs, testes, and brain. Importantly, this study clearly showed that the mRNA can cross the blood brain barrier. Next slide. Consistent with what is seen in animal studies, the vaccine mRNA and its spike protein have been detected in humans across multiple tissues, including blood, lymph nodes, the heart, and even the brain. These findings make it clear that the mRNA does not remain confined to the injection site. Importantly, persistence has been documented well beyond the initial hours or days, lasting weeks in some tissues, and in certain studies detectable for many months. Next slide. To summarize the biodistribution data, it's important to note that neither Moderna nor Pfizer used their actual commercial mRNA vaccine products in the preclinical biodistribution studies. Instead, they relied on surrogate construct packaged in same or similar lipid nanoparticles. Second, the results of those studies show that the mRNA and lipid nanoparticles were not confined to the injection site. Systemic distribution was observed with evidence that the mRNA can cross the blood brain barrier. Consistent with these findings, studies in humans have confirmed that vaccine mRNA can be detected in multiple tissues, including lymph nodes, the heart, the central nervous system, and blood. Finally, persistence is not just short term. In some reports, mRNA has been detected for weeks to months, and in certain cases as long as seven zero six days post vaccination. Taken together, these data highlight that biodistribution is broad and persistence is longer than initially expected, raising important questions and concerns for ongoing research and safety monitoring.
View Full Interactive Feed