reSee.it - Related Post Feed
reSee.it AI Summary
A scientist challenges RFK Jr's contradictory stance on vaccines. He endorses full vaccination but claims they're unsafe due to corrupt officials. Yet, he vaccinated all his children and guests at his home. He endorsed pro-vaccine candidates but supports lockdowns and attacks Fauci. He wants corrupt agencies to create safe vaccines but ignores the outdated 1962 Kennedy Vaccination Act. The real problem is the government controlling our bodies. A new act based on personalized medicine is needed.
@va_shiva - Dr.SHIVA Ayyadurai, MIT PhD. Inventor of Email
(1/8) Candidate to Candidate, I challenge RFK, Jr. to debate me - a scientist in immunology & activist for medical freedom - on his MASSIVE CONTRADICTIONS concerning his position on vaccines. First, he says he’s for “FULL VACCINATION OF ALL AMERICANS” on the video at…
Video Transcript AI Summary
Minister Farrakhan requested me to discuss African American vaccine safety. I want to emphasize that I am strongly in favor of vaccines. I vaccinated all of my 6 children and support policies promoting vaccination for all Americans.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Minister Farrakhan has asked me to address the issue of vaccines and African American vaccine safety. I wanna start out by saying this, and I wanna say it emphatically. I am pro vaccine. I, I have always been furiously pro vaccine. I had all 6 of my children vaccinated, and I believe that we ought to have policies that encourage full vaccination for all Americans.
@va_shiva - Dr.SHIVA Ayyadurai, MIT PhD. Inventor of Email
(2/8) Then, RFK, Jr. rants for nearly ~10 minutes as seen in the FULL VIDEO - which is linked right there on http://RFKExposed.com - that these vaccines are not safe since they were authorized by “corrupt” GOVT officials WATCH the FULL VIDEO (directions below), AND…
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Vomits BIG LIES When Exposed with Truth. Party Over!
Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. Vomits BIG LIES When Exposed with Truth. Party Over! 5 Facts versus 5 Lies. #RFKExposed
rfkexposed.com
@va_shiva - Dr.SHIVA Ayyadurai, MIT PhD. Inventor of Email
(3/8) Ask yourself, if Booby KNEW corrupt government officials at CDC & other agencies authorized unsafe vaccines, as he has claimed for years, why would he vaccinate all SIX of HIS children with SIXTY PLUS vaccines, and then cast aspersions for vaccines for YOUR kids? THEN,…
@va_shiva - Dr.SHIVA Ayyadurai, MIT PhD. Inventor of Email
(4/8) Ask yourself, why he ORDERED all his guests entering HIS HOME in 2022 to get the COVID-19 VACCINE, when he’s been railing against the mRNA vaccine being unsafe and an “experiment” that “violates the Nuremberg code.” THEN, if you get over that, … https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10321283/Anti-vaxxer-RFK-Jr-ordered-guests-attending-holiday-party-California-home-vaccinated.html
Anti-vaxxer RFK Jr. ordered holiday party guests to be vaccinated
Prominent anti-vaxxer Robert F Kennedy Jr held a holiday party at his California home last week, with the invitation urging guests to be vaccinated or get tested for COVID before coming over.
dailymail.co.uk
@va_shiva - Dr.SHIVA Ayyadurai, MIT PhD. Inventor of Email
(5/8) Ask yourself, why he ENDORSED both PRO-VACCINE MANDATING @HillaryClinton for President in 2016 three times AND his nephew @joekennedy for US Senate in 2020. Both, to repeat, are RABIDLY, are for pro-vaccine mandates. THEN, if you can still reconcile all this, …
@va_shiva - Dr.SHIVA Ayyadurai, MIT PhD. Inventor of Email
(6/8) Ask yourself, WHY did fascist RFK, Jr. support STRICT lockdowns lockstep w Fauci, and yet made money attacking Fauci in 2021, and wanted to jail climate change skeptics for exercising their First Amendment Rights @goddeketal If you can reconcile this hypocrisy, THEN, … https://t.co/DPvATrxz0L
@va_shiva - Dr.SHIVA Ayyadurai, MIT PhD. Inventor of Email
(7/8) Ask yourself, why RFK, Jr. wants the VERY SAME corrupt GOVERNMENT agencies - he rails against throughout the video - to NOW create “safe vaccines”? The truth is he’s a scumbag OPPORTUNIST mess of contradictions, & doesn’t want to address the REAL PROBLEM, which is the…
@va_shiva - Dr.SHIVA Ayyadurai, MIT PhD. Inventor of Email
(8/8) The 1962 Kennedy Vaccination Act based on OUTDATED science of 1915 that created the VERY corrupt GOVT bodies that now CONTROLS our bodies As President, I’ll replace the 1962 Act w one based on Precision & Personalized Medicine to support Natural Immunity!
@iFightForKids - Alex Rosen
I confronted @PeterHotez and asked why he is too scared to debate @RobertKennedyJr on the @joerogan podcast! W/ @merissahansen17
Video Transcript AI Summary
Peter Hodges is asked why he won't debate RFK on Joe Rogan's podcast, but he dismisses it as harassment. He is then asked if he has anything to say to people who believe they are vaccine injured, but he avoids giving a direct answer. The question is repeated, asking if he believes vaccine injuries are real, but he still avoids answering. The conversation ends with a sarcastic comment about going on a safari to vaccinate more kids.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Okay. Yeah. Oh, are you Peter Hodges? I am. Hi.
Nice to meet you. How are you? Hey. So why are you not, like, gonna debate, RFK on Joe Rogan's podcast? Oh, come on.
That's harassing. I'm just I'm just curious. What? No. Nothing at all.
Just curious. I haven't said anything one way or the other. I mean, are you planning on doing it? You know, I just you just invited me, so we'll see. And I think you should, though.
Well, we'll give it some we'll give it some thought. Okay. And what do you have to say to people who think they're a vaccine injured? Anything for them? I don't continue.
I have I mean, do you have anything to say to people that think do you have anything to say to people? Yeah. I mean, do you think vaccine injuries are real, Peter? Peter, it's just a question. Settle the science now.
On a safari to go vaccinate more kids.
@StillmanMD - Leland Stillman, MD
Almost two years ago, @RobertKennedyJr re-posted a video of me speaking out at a medical freedom event. That video was seen by millions of people - then pulled off of YouTube as "misinformation." Everything I said was 100% correct. https://www.bitchute.com/video/GavtRkDZVZmD/
Bright Young Doctor Explains Why He is against Mandatory COVID-19 Vaccines
A COVID-19 vaccine should not be mandatory and getting people to take it “serves certain special interests,” said Dr. Leland Stillman at the “March Against Mandates” in Richmond, Virginia on Sept 10, 2020.
His website: https://www.stillmanmd.com/
bitchute.com
reSee.it AI Summary
RobertKennedyJr passionately opposes government weaponization, emphasizing the importance of free speech for democracy. He's renowned as the founder of ChildrensHD, author of The Real Anthony Fauci, and a dedicated fighter against censorship and pharma corruption. Join his cause and follow him for more. Witness his powerful testimony at the live hearing: https://bitly/RFKTestifies.
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
BREAKING: @RobertKennedyJr Delivers Opening Statement Against the Weaponization of the US Govt “Censorship is antithetical to our party. It was appalling to my father, to my uncle, to FDR, to Harry Truman, to Thomas Jefferson ... It [free speech] is the basis for democracy. It…
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker emphasizes the importance of focusing on issues that directly impact the American people, such as rising grocery prices, the war in Ukraine, inflation, and border issues. They express concern about being deplatformed on YouTube for discussing these topics and assert the need for respectful debate and the protection of the First Amendment. The speaker mentions being censored by both the Democratic and Trump administrations and criticizes the use of pejoratives like "anti-vaxx" and "antisemitism" to silence them. They highlight their support for Israel and argue against toxic polarization, advocating for kindness, respect, and empathy in political discourse. The speaker concludes by emphasizing the significance of the Constitution in guiding our actions.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: That this body ought to be concerning itself with the, with issues that impact directly the American people. The rising price of groceries, 76% over the past 2 years were basic foodstuff, the war in Ukraine, the inflation issues, the border issues, many, many other issues that concern us all as a nation. We can't do that without the 1st Amendment, without debate. When I gave my speech, my announcement speech in Boston, 2 months ago. YouTube, I I talked about all those issues.
I focused on grocery. I focused on the the fact that working class people can no longer afford to live in this country. I talked about inflation, all the issues that deeply concern you, and that you've devoted your career to alleviating those issues. 5 minutes into my speech When I was talking about Paul Revere, YouTube deplatformed me. I didn't talk about vaccines in that speech.
I didn't talk about anything that be it was a verbose subject. I just was talking about my campaign and the things, the conversation, that we ought to be happy with each other as Americans, but I was shut down. And that is why the First Amendment's important debate, congenial, respectful debate, is the is the fertilizer. It's the water. It's the sunlight for our democracy.
We need to be talking to each other. There this is a letter that many of you signed, many of my fellow Democrats. I've spent my life in this party. I've devoted my life to the values of this party. There's a 102 people signed this.
This itself is evidence of the problem that this Hearing was convened to address. This is an attempt to censor a censorship hearing. The The charge is in this, and and, by the way, censorship is antithetical to our party. It was it was appalling to my father, to my uncle, to FDR, to Harry Truman, to Thomas Jefferson as the chairman referred to. It is the basis for democracy.
It sets us apart from all of the previous forms of government. We need to be able to talk, and and the First Amendment was not written for easy speech. It was written for the speech that nobody likes you for, and I was I was censored not just by the Democratic administration. I was censored by the Trump administration. I was the 1st person censored by the as the chairman pointed out, by the Biden administration 2 days after it came into office.
It ordered a truthful and by the way, They had to invent a new word called malinformation to to censor people like me. Hey. There was no misinformation on my Instagram account. Everything I put on that account was cited and sourced. The peer reviewed publications or government databases, nobody has ever pointed to a single piece of misinformation that I publish.
I was removed for something they called malinformation. Malinformation is information that is True, but it's inconvenient to the government that they don't want people to hear, and it and as antithetical to the values of our country. After I announced my presidency, it became more difficult for people to censor me outright. So now I'm subject to this new form of censorship, which is called targeted propaganda, where people apply pejoratives like anti vaxx. I've never been to any vaccine, but everybody in this room probably believes that I have been cause that's the prevailing narrative.
Antisemitism, racism, these are are the most appalling, disgusting pejoratives, and they're applied to me to silence me because people don't want me to have that conversation about the war, about groceries, about inflation, about the war on the middle class in this country that we need to be having. And and by the way, I wanna say this while I'm on the record, that in my entire life and why I'm under oath, In my entire life, I have never uttered a phrase that was either racist or anti Semitic. I have spent my life fighting my professional career, fighting for Israel, For the protection of Israel, I have a better record on Israel than anybody in this chamber today. I'm the only person who has publicly objected There's a $2,000,000,000 payout that the Biden administration is now making to Iran, which is a is a a genocidal program. I'm the only one who's objected to that.
I fought more ferociously for Israel than anybody, but I am being censored here through this target, through smears, through misinterpretations of what it says, through lies, through association, which is a tactic that we all thought we had been credited and dispensed with after the Army McCarthy hearings in 19 fifties with those same weapons are now being deployed against me to silence me. I know many of the people who wrote this letter. I don't believe there's a single person who signed this letter who believes I'm anti Semitic. I do not believe that. There is no evidence of that.
I want to say something I think that's that's more important, and it goes directly to what you talked about, ranking member, which is the the the need, the this toxic polarization that it is destroying our country today. And how do we deal with that? We are more this kind of division is more dangerous for our country than any time since the American civil war. And how do we deal with that? How are we gonna every democrat on this committee believes that we need to end that polarization.
Do you think you can do that by censoring people? I'm telling you, you cannot. You that only aggravates and amplifies the problem. We need to start being kind to each other. We need to start being respectful to each other.
We need to start start restoring the comedy to this chamber and and and to the rest of Americans, but it has to start here. My uncle Edward Kennedy has more legislation with his name on it than any senator in United States' history. Why is that? Because he was able to reach across the aisle, because he didn't deal in insults, because he didn't try to censor people. He brought home people who were antithetical to to what he believed in.
He came home almost every weekend with people like Orrin Hatch to our house and that compound in Hyannis Port. At that time, Orrin Hatch to me was like Darth Vader because I was an environmentalist, and I was saying, why why is Teddy bringing this guy home? But he knew that he was effective because he understood that comedy and respect and kindness and compassion and empathy for other people is the way that we the only way to restore the function in this in this chamber, but more importantly, today, we need to give an example in the leadership of our country, of being respectful to each other. If you think I said something that's anti Semitic, let's talk about the details. I'm telling you all the things that I'm accused of right now by you, and in this letter are distortions.
They're misrepresentations. I said I didn't say those things. There's fragments that I said, but I denounce anybody who is who uses the words that I have said to imply something that is negative about people who are Jewish. I never said those things, and I wanna point out also that the chairman pointed to Dennis Kucinich's fight behind me. There is no 2 people in a in the country who feel differently about more differently about American politics than these 2 people, and yet they were friends.
Dennis attended his children's basketball games, attended his daughter's wedding. This is what we need how we need to start treating each other in this country. We have to stop trying to destroy each other, to marginalize, to vilify, to gaslight each other. We have to find that place inside of ourselves of light, of empathy, of compassion, and above all, We need to elevate the constitution of the United States, which was written for hard times, and that has to be the premier compass for all of our activities. Thank you very much.
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
@RobertKennedyJr is the founder of @ChildrensHD, the author of "The Real Anthony Fauci," attorney, and Democratic Presidential Candidate. He's been fighting censorship and pharma corruption for a long time. If you are not already doing so, kindly give him a warm follow:
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
@RobertKennedyJr @ChildrensHD Live Hearing: https://bit.ly/RFK-Testifies
LIVE NOW: Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Testifies on Weaponization of the Federal Government to House Judiciary Committee
Democratic presidential candidate, attorney Robert F. Kennedy Jr.; Emma-Jo Morris, journalist at Breitbart News; and D. John Sauer, ...
theepochtimes.com
reSee.it AI Summary
DDT, a banned chemical, was extensively sprayed in the US and worldwide. Its persistence in the environment poses risks to human health. Studies show higher DDT levels in obese and diabetic individuals. Offspring of those exposed to DDT face increased obesity and diabetes risks. Environmental toxins contribute to the current health crisis. Robert Kennedy Jr. stands out for addressing these issues and holding corporations accountable. Prioritizing health is crucial. Support RFK and his long-standing commitment to public well-being.
@Inversionism - Inversionism
According to the US government, 1.35 billion tons of DDT was sprayed onto just the United States until it was banned for general use in the 70s. That's nearly the equivalent of two empire state buildings in weight of pure DDT, doused all over the country. Hard to fathom... Now watch this video from the 1940s where the US government went to third world countries and sprayed DDT on LITERALLY everything, and then try to comprehend how much weight of DDT has been sprayed across the world in totality. They covered every single inch of the aboriginal huts in it, beds and bed frames, vehicles, kitchens, floors, garbage racks, food storage containers, throughout entire forests sprayed aerially from airplanes or manually by soldiers, and anywhere else they can think of. They even setup these drip containers that just continually dropped DDT into nearby lakes, rivers, etc. Seriously everywhere, no exaggeration. Nearly every bit of the DDT you see the US military spraying in this video, is still in the environment now 70+ years later and having an effect on us and all other life on earth. Like PFOA/PFAS, DDT is basically a forever chemical and that is extremely persistent in the environment because it's fat soluble, and will continually increase in concentration over time into those at the top of the food chain, which is human beings. In a study done in 2021 published to the Indian Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism titled "Adipose Tissue Levels of DDT as Risk Factor for Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus", they found the following. >Results: Obese subjects, irrespective of their glycemic status, and T2DM subjects had higher concentrations of DDT. p, p' DDT was found to increase the odds for diabetes, and o, p' DDT for central obesity. p, p' DDD was also strongly correlated with central obesity, glycemic parameters, and triglycerides. So they are still finding DDT in people decades later in 2021, and they found those with the highest concentrations been more obese and diabetic. In another study published in 2014 looking at the effect of DDT on pregnant mice, they found a huge increased risk of obesity and diabetes on offspring as well. So those born to parents who were inundated by DDT in the 40s/50s/60s for the contrived polio epidemic, will have children that are far more likely to be overweight and diabetic. Combine this with seed oils, excessive carbohydrates and processed junk food, among many other environmental toxins, and you now have an obesity epidemic with rampant chronic disease. Facts and realities like this are why I support @RobertKennedyJr - He's the only candidate who is talking about these environmental toxins and wants to hold the perpetrators responsible. No one else is talking about glyphosate, aluminum in vaccines, EMF, and every other variable destroying health in America, nor has anyone had as much success as him at suing criminal corporations for it. Nothing else matters if you don't have your health and you're being poisoned against your will. It's priority #1, and you should support those like RFK who have had that as their first priority for decades.
Video Transcript AI Summary
A malaria control squad enters an abandoned village to disperse DDT, a powerful insecticide. DDT is applied as an oil solution using power spraying equipment, effectively eliminating disease-carrying insects. Residual treatment of surfaces like walls, mattresses, and bed frames ensures long-lasting protection. Other areas such as galleys, mess halls, screens, garbage racks, and fly habitats are also treated. DDT is used to prevent the spread of disease vectors on planes and in military operations. Larva siding is crucial for mosquito control, and DDT solutions are effective in destroying larvae. Dispersal of DDT from planes provides even coverage in inaccessible areas. Ongoing research aims to improve DDT formulas and application methods.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Now let's consider the ways to disperse DDT. Equipped with a supply of oil solution and power spraying equipment, a malaria control squad enters an abandoned village, a reservoir of infection. Within 24 hours, vectors of typhus, yellow fever, malaria, dengue, filariasis, and dysentery began to disappear. DDT is not a repellent, however. It kills surely, but slowly.
Hence, its effectiveness cannot be measured by account of dead insects. Or after receiving a lethal dose, the insects go elsewhere to die. Residual treatment of the inner walls of these huts that means that a contact poison awaits any insect which alights upon them for several weeks or months depending upon variant factors such as the intensity of the original treatment, rains, washing, prevailing winds, and so forth. Using a paint sprayer, the worker spreads DDT evenly so that the entire surface is covered. A semi coarse spray is required for residual treatment.
A fine spray is lost in the air. Experience teaches the correct amount to spray without waste. The entire surface should be thoroughly wet without runoff. Residual treatment of all quarters pays big dividends in the health and happiness of the crew. In a few hours, a two man crew may treat hundreds of mattresses and bumps with 5% DDT and kerosene.
If correctly applied, this renders sleeping quarters free from bed bugs for many months. Mattresses should not be slept on until the kerosene has evaporated, and the smoking lamp should be out until the following morning. Because DDT crystals cling tenaciously to the fibers of textiles, cots, tents, and jungle helmets should receive the residual treatment. By treating bed frames and springs in this position, salvos are simultaneously fired against the bed bugs in the walls. This increases efficiency and eliminates waste.
Before treating galleys and mess halls, food, trays, cooking utensils, and work tables must be covered. Kerosene is used as a solvent for residual spraying of areas where stains from darker oils are to be avoided. For residual treatment against roaches, 5% DDT and kerosene, fuel oil, or emulsion is sprayed around pipes, in cracks, and in other places they frequent. It is as effective as 10% DDT dust. DDT crystals in the interstices of screens poisons insects where they frequently alight.
Here, DDT emulsion is applied with paintbrushes. When the emulsion has dried, the screen has almost regained its former appearance. An alternative method for treating screens is with an ordinary spray gun. The insecticide is more apt to be wasted this way however. DDT oil solution leaves an effective residuum on garbage racks and other fly habitats.
Since these services are frequently washed, repeated applications become necessary. Because dysentery is second only to malaria as a threat to military operations, it is especially important to treat the slit trench and surrounding areas. Garbage pits, dugouts, and gun emplacements should be similarly sprayed. Unless the entire bivouac area is treated, an influx of insects from adjacent areas may occur. Bushes, logs, dead leaves and the ground itself should be sprayed.
Residual treatment upon the inside of planes prevents the spread of disease vectors to uninfested islands. This supplements rather than replaces the use of aerosol bombs in aircraft. Either pressure or hand sprayers may be used. Or killing insects on the wing, a fine fog spray, wind drifted, has been found most effective. Repeated fog applications may even leave a residuum.
Men with DDT aerosol bombs walking briskly 20 feet apart eradicate insects on the wing within the area traversed. Excessive winds reduce the effectiveness of this treatment. By the addition of DDT to Navy aerosol bombs, greater effectiveness against mosquitoes has been attained. Flies which previously defied this treatment are now killed. The effectiveness of DDT against lice was first proved in the field during the typhus epidemic at Naples.
The 10% powder is applied to the hair and distributed between clothing and skin. DDT dust is also useful in storerooms and the holds of ships. Projected through a nozzle extension, it penetrates to the haunts of roaches. It should be applied generously around cracks and crannies. The rotary duster distributes DDT dust in areas frequented by flies, roaches, and ants.
Here it lies until carried away by wind or rain. Less tenacious than the residuum of the oil solution, it is nevertheless a persisting poison against insects. If the worker stands to windward, it is not necessary to wear a mask when dispensing DDT dust. For complete mosquito control, larva siding is essential. Solutions drifted by wind over water at a rate of 1 tenth pound of DDT tea per acre, destroy larvae within 24 hours.
These obvious breeding places are rendered harmless is when minute quantities of DDT are ejected from a small hand sprayer. The drip can method, wholly ineffective where there are strong currents, may be used for larvociding still water or slow streams. The figures sound fantastic, but one part of DDT and 20,000,000 parts of water killed all larvae. In the absence of other equipment, D D T solution may be poured under the surface of ponds. However, this is not a preferred method.
Oil solutions of DDT remain on the surface. Emulsions penetrate the depths. Therefore, the latter require heavier dosage. Whatever the method or the solution with proper dosage, most larvae die within 24 hours. The greatest potentiality of DDT lies in dispersal from planes.
This assures even distribution, coverage of otherwise inaccessible areas, and the conservation of manpower. This is the only method whereby insect control may be established shortly after d day. 5% DDT in equal full parts of diesel and lubricating oil is spread at the rate of 2 quarts per acre. Dispersal of DDT by planes combines features of 3 methods of treatment previously presented. Descending through the air, it kills adult insects on the wing as the fog treatment does.
Experiments and inventions are constantly being made to improve DDT formulae and methods of application. The pocket atomizer comparable in size to a fountain pen may soon be supplied for individual use. Work in progress indicates that DDT may also be sprayed from fast planes, or it may be dispersed explosively. In this rapidly evolving field of insect control, new methods are constantly being sought and tested.
@Thekeksociety - DR. Kek
WHEN WILL THE PEOPLE FINALLY UNDERSTAND THAT PIG PHARMA AND THE GOVERNMENT HAS NO CLUE AT WHAT’S BEST FOR US? https://t.co/50UaKMrFT8
Video Transcript AI Summary
In the past, obstetrics has seen a series of interventions with harmful consequences. X-rays were used in the 1930s to measure pelvises, but they were later found to cause cancer in babies. In the 1950s and 1960s, a drug called Thalidomide resulted in babies being born without limbs. In the 1990s, the use of Cytotek to induce labor in women with previous caesareans led to numerous ruptured uteruses and deaths of babies. Unfortunately, there hasn't been enough careful study of the long-term effects of these interventions in obstetric practice. To ensure a more humanized birth experience, it may be best to explore alternative options.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You look at obstetrics for the last 50 years, what do you find? In the 19 thirties, they were giving X rays on every pregnant woman to measure her pelvis. And then in the 19 forties, they discovered that that caused the baby to have cancer, so they had to stop it. And then in the 19 fifties sixties, they had another drug called Thalidomide which caused babies to be born without arms and legs, and then they had to stop that. But you see, in every case, it was after the fact.
In 19 nineties, they were giving Cytotek to induce labor in women who had had a previous caesarean, and they ended up with hundreds and hundreds of ruptured uteruses and many, many, many dead babies before they found out finally in 1999 that they shouldn't do that, but you see, there's not a good history in obstetric practice of careful study of the long term effects of all these interventions. This is why if you really want a humanized birth, the best thing to do is to get the hell out of the
@Inversionism - Inversionism
You cannot stop talking about this now that you're running for president @RobertKennedyJr Haven't heard you talk about vaccines much at all recently, and I think you should take some advice from @VivekGRamaswamy and start speaking the blunt truth about them like you did in this clip.
@TheChiefNerd - Chief Nerd
Robert F. Kennedy Jr on Why You Don’t ‘Trust the Experts’ “Trusting the experts is not a feature of science. It’s not a feature of democracy. It’s a feature of religion and totalitarianism.” https://t.co/gbAIsJ4mg1
Video Transcript AI Summary
Trusting experts is not a feature of science or democracy. In legal cases, both sides present experts who can be convincing. Experts have their own biases and ambitions, so it's not reliable to trust them blindly. Trusting experts is more common in religion and totalitarianism.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This phrase, trust the experts, is not a thing. It's a it certainly is not a feature of democracy. It's not a feature of science. In science, you don't trust the experts. Never.
Oh, I've sued I've I've had over 500 cases, and in each one of them, there was scientific controversy. There was experts on both sides when I assumed Monsanto. Monsanto came in with experts from Stanford, Harvard, and Yale. My wife, who's an actor, came to court that day on the last day of their testimony. She watched these people, and then afterwards, and they're so convincing.
She walked out and she said, why are you even troubling this this poor company to me? I would, like, wait till tomorrow. On the next day, we had our experts from Harvard, Stanford, and Yale, and the jury gave us $2,200,000,000. It hurt both of them, and they had to decide which expert is lying. And experts have their own prejudice.
They have their own biases and their own ambitions, etcetera. And so it's not, you know, trusting the experts is not a feature of science. It's not a feature of democracy. It's a feature of religion and totalitarianism, and but it's not something
@TheChiefNerd - Chief Nerd
Full Video: https://youtu.be/zi9d25gnaAw
reSee.it AI Summary
The posts discuss COVID vaccine injuries, big pharma lies, and systemic corruption. The author expresses respect for @RobertKennedyJr's book and encourages open-mindedness and counter debate. They emphasize that this is a human issue, not a partisan one. We are all in this together.
@Cancelcloco - Ian Carroll
COVID vaccine injuries, big pharma lies, systemic corruption. Finally time to talk about it ALL. Huge respect to @RobertKennedyJr for the book. You’ve earned my vote. And if you’re offended by or disagree with anything in this video, I encourage you to watch it all with an open mind and then offer counter debate in the comments. This is not a partisan issue. This is a HUMAN issue. We’re all in this together. 🫶🫶🫶
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the alarming findings of a study on vaccine injuries, highlighting red flags in the data. They mention white blood clots found in deceased patients and question the safety of COVID vaccines. The speaker emphasizes the importance of fact-checking and following the money in the pharmaceutical industry. They urge viewers to prioritize truth over profit and advocate for open scientific debate.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well the truth is finally coming out about the vaccines and I think it's finally time to talk about it just like the opioid epidemic pharma can only pay to control the information space for so long. But, eventually, scientists are actually gonna science. And the largest study to date conducted on vaccine injuries just came out. It included 99,000,000 individuals from all around the world. And when you read through it, it is really clear that we have been being gaslit and lied to for all these years.
You can read through the whole thing if you want. A nice easy visual is red and yellow are not good. Red is really not good. Myo means myocarditis. Per means pericarditis, you know, problems of the heart.
The kinds of things that would make young people have heart attacks, but we're about to go way deeper than just this study. Warning, I'm about to show basic medical procedures that include some blood. If you're really squeamish, maybe pause. I don't know. So morticians have been pulling out what are called white blood clots for a long time now and it's been heavily suppressed, but it's not hard to find all over the Internet, particularly on x now and everyone that's talking about this stuff that like professionals in the field that are seeing these things, that are extracting these things, they are all saying that they've never seen this before ever, and they don't know what's going on.
Well, we might have some idea. This is actually a video of a mortician removing one of these clots from an artery of a deceased patient. So you can see the artery is still right there, and they're pulling the clot out of the artery. You can see how this kind of thing in your arteries might cause you to have some heart problems, some brain problems, you know, like some health problems. Your arteries aren't supposed to have worms in them once again.
And seeing as it's about to be an election, I figured it was time that I read Robert Kennedy's book about Fauci and the covid situation. And before I read you from this, I just wanna remind everyone that Anthony Fauci is the highest paid employee of the government. He has a ton of money. If this book was full of lies and defamation, RFK Junior would be in court right now, but he's not. So now I'm gonna read you some of this.
On February 17, 2020, Anthony Fauci said, quote, if you look at the mask that you buy in a drug store, the leakage around that doesn't really do much to protect you. Now in the United States, there's absolutely no reason whatsoever to wear a mask. You can see how I've slashed an orange everywhere where there are citations. You'll see this in all my screenshots. We'll come back to that.
January 28th, Fauci said, quote, the one thing historically people need to realize that even if there is some asymptomatic transmission in all the history of respiratory borne viruses of any type, asymptomatic transition has never been the driver of outbreaks. The driver of outbreaks is always symptomatic person. Even if there's a rare asymptomatic person that might transmit, an epidemic is not driven by asymptomatic carrier.
Speaker 1: At that point, we didn't really understand the fatality rate. You know, we didn't understand that it's a fairly low fatality rate and that it's a disease mainly of the elderly, kind of like flu is, although a bit different than that. So that
Speaker 0: Okay, Bill. That would have been great to know 3 years ago. Furthermore, some 52 studies, all available on the NIH's website, find that ordinary masking using anything less than an n 95 respirator doesn't reduce viral infection rate. Moreover, some 25 additional studies attribute to masking a grim retinue of harms, including respiratory and immune system illness, as well as dermatological, dental, gastrointestinal, and psychological injury. Professor David Nabarro, senior envoy on COVID 19 at the WHO on October 8, 2020 said, quote, we and the World Health Organization do not advocate lockdowns as a primary means of controlling this virus.
We may well have a doubling of world poverty by next year, so we really do appeal to all world leaders. Stop using lockdowns as your primary control method. Lockdowns just have one consequence that you must never belittle, and that is making poor people an awful lot poorer. Massive amounts of small family owned businesses were closed indefinitely because of the lockdown. This graph shows percent change in small business revenue from 2020 onwards.
The graph for corporate profits, mega corporations looks very different. This is 2020 when they're supposed to be reducing their profits there. Yeah. That's a very different outcome for mega corporations for mega corporations that didn't have to close their stores because they were deemed essential. This obviously also includes big pharma's profits.
Think about it. What you're seeing right here is a representation of 1,000,000,000 of dollars of profit, I e 1,000,000,000 of dollars of incentive. Now let's get back to these things and adverse effects of the vaccine that you've not been told about. HHS's own studies indicate that VAERS may be underestimating vaccine injuries by over 99% with a citation. Now let's talk about all these citations.
Everything I've read to you so far is just within the first five pages of this book. Here is citation 29. Every chapter is followed by a massive list of citations. These are just the citations for the first chapter. We are only that far into the book with all these citations so far, and there are more blocks of citations all throughout.
That is how you conduct journalism and science. But another important part of it is to double check those citations, especially when they make wild claims like 99% unreported vaccine injuries. So I decided to double check this citation. And so first, I tried typing in just, like, the first ten words of this study's name, whatever, verbatim, so that hopefully that much text would just find this article. And note that this isn't even Google search.
This is Brave search. Fact check. Fact check. Fact check. Fact check.
Fact check, fact check, fact check, fact check. So I tried DuckDuckGo. Same thing. Factcheck.org. Fact check.
Fact check. Fact check. Fact check. Fact check. Is that not concerning to anyone?
Because I eventually resorted to just typing in the entire URL by hand, found the report from the official government website published long before COVID ever happened, where it clearly states fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse events are reported. That's how you fact check, by going to primary sources. There has never been a time in all of modern history when big pharma were the good guys. And obviously, modern medical technology, vaccine technology is amazing and it has saved so many lives. Science, the collective progression of human understanding of reality, is undoubtedly our greatest achievement as a species.
And this is clearly destructive to science. This is what big money paying to cover up science looks like. This is what actual science looks like. This is what actual science looks like. And as with all things, you should always follow the money and wonder, is anyone making 1,000,000,000 of dollars off of the thing I'm being told right now?
And if they are, you should ask a lot of questions. And if they take this video down for medical misinformation, that only exposes how much deeper this goes. Because the interns that are checking this video clearly do not have pages and pages of citations of sources of scientific literature like this, and if they are involved in suppressing scientific debate amongst legitimate parties, you have to ask yourself, why the hell are they doing that?
Speaker 2: Because all the data was consistent with this vaccine being the most dangerous vaccine of all time. I mean, there there are more reports on this vaccine in the Figteras system, which is the the vaccine adverse event reporting system. There are more reports for the COVID vaccine than for all vaccines in history combined. And so they got back a spreadsheet showing 770 safety signals were triggered. That is mind blowing.
Now, normally, a vaccine only will trigger 0 safety signals. It'd be really unusual for a vaccine to trigger any safety signals in Paris.
Speaker 0: This study I keep referencing was so alarming and efficacious that it's even making its way through the mainstream leftist news media. And doctors are actually saying what it's saying.
Speaker 3: The largest COVID vaccine study to date was just released.
Speaker 0: And all throughout this interview with his scientist, Chris tries to spin it to pump the old school narrative.
Speaker 3: My producer just got in my ear, Ben, and said, hey. You know, the study suggests that if you were vaccinated, you're less likely to get long COVID. No. Is that true in your experience?
Speaker 4: Need a lot more data on that, but it seems that many patients that had long COVID that got vaccinated actually got worse instead of better.
Speaker 0: So just wanna end by saying there's no shame in being tricked by big pharma. It happened to 1,000,000 of people with the opioid epidemic. They are professionals at it. It is how they make 1,000,000,000 of dollars. It's okay to have been wrong.
It's okay to change your mind. It is okay to trust the science. As long as that science isn't being funded by multibillion dollar corporations with a long history of negligence and outright disregard for human life. This is not a political issue. This is a human issue.
And unless you're taking home a multimillion dollar paycheck from big pharma, there's no reason for you to be on Pfizer's side instead of on the side of truth and open discussion of science.
@DrMarkGhalili - Dr. Mark Ghalili DO
For RFK Jr. to call me AMAZING is truly an honor. I truly believe His political decision will allow us to take back our country. Bobby, I pray they make you the head of the US Department of Health and Human Services! 🙏🇺🇸 #MAHA Make America Healthy Again https://t.co/HIsv4FWIY5
Video Transcript AI Summary
Mark Alighley is an amazing doctor, and Rachel West is also an amazing doctor.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Mark Alighley, who is an amazing doctor and Rachel West, who is also an amazing doctor, who is also in the night. And I want
@dbenner83 - Dave Benner, Nemesis of Neocons
@RobertKennedyJr Snowden had it right long ago. We don't need a governmental referee to counter speech we don't like. We just need more speech. https://t.co/s81yTFZ4fE
Video Transcript AI Summary
The problem of fake news is not solved by a referee, but by participants helping each other point out what is fake and true. The answer to bad speech is not censorship, but more speech. Critical thinking matters more than ever, given that lies seem to be getting very popular.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The problem of fake news isn't solved by hoping for a referee, but rather because we, as participants, we, as citizens, we, as users of these services, help each other. We talk and we share and we point out what is fake. We point out what is true. The answer to bad speech is not censorship. The answer to bad speech is more speech.
We have to exercise and spread the idea that critical thinking matters now more than ever given the fact that lies seem to be getting very popular.
@GuntherEagleman - Gunther Eagleman™
BREAKING: RFK Jr. just vowed to remove entire departments of the FDA! This is what I’m talking about! https://t.co/sR0sYxM6YF
Video Transcript AI Summary
Clearing out corruption involves addressing certain federal service workers at agencies like the FDA and CDC. Some departments, particularly in nutrition at the FDA, are failing to protect children, as evidenced by the excessive ingredients in products like Fruit Loops compared to Canada. While eliminating agencies would require congressional approval, the focus is on removing corruption within them. With 40 years of experience in tackling corporate corruption and a PhD in the field, the goal is to ensure that Americans receive accurate information and can make informed choices, leading to better health outcomes.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You say clearing out the corruption in your terms. Would that mean clearing out the top level federal service workers that are currently at the FDA
Speaker 1: and CDC? In some categories, I would say. What does that look like? Yeah. In some categories of workers, their entire departments like the nutrition departments at FDA that are that have to go, that are are not doing their job.
They're not protecting our kids. Why do we have Fruit Loops in this country that have 18 or 19 ingredients and you go to Canada and it's got 2 or 3. Would you eliminate any of the agencies? I'm my my to eliminate the agencies as long as it requires congressional approval, I wouldn't be doing that. I can get the corruption out of the agencies.
That's what I've been doing for 40 years. I've sued all those agencies. I have a PhD in corporate corruption, and that's what I do. And once they're not corrupt, once Americans are getting good signs and are allowed to make their own choices, they're gonna get a lot healthier.
@MTGrepp - Marjorie Taylor Greene Press Release (Parody)
HOLY SH*T 🚨 Robert F. Kennedy Jr. EXPOSED “Dr” Fauci. It is time to throw Fauci in Prison 🇺🇸 “Dr” Fauci NEEDS to be held accountable 👏 What do you think ? https://t.co/OovXYLCbQR
Video Transcript AI Summary
On January 9, 2024, Anthony Fauci admitted that the 6-foot social distancing guideline "sort of just appeared," revealing it wasn't based on scientific evidence. He also acknowledged that masks don't provide the protection people believed they did, stating there was no reason to wear them during outbreaks. Fauci previously claimed that vaccines would protect against infection, but the pandemic response led to high death rates in the U.S. Critics of Fauci faced censorship and were labeled conspiracy theorists. Recently, Fauci suggested the lab leak theory is plausible, while some anti-vaccine activists rallied in Washington, D.C. The speaker calls for a new political path, urging donations to their campaign to restore self-governance and democracy in America.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: On January 9, 2024, doctor Anthony Fauci admitted during congressional testimony that the 6 foot social distancing mandate, quote, sort of just appeared, end quote.
Speaker 1: Doctor Anthony Fauci now admitting social distancing wasn't based on science. Fauci telling a house committee this week, the idea standing 6 feet apart, quote, just sort of appeared. The shocking admission comes nearly four years after statements like this.
Speaker 2: Every aspect of that ending the COVID outbreak in 30 days has some aspect of it, a physical separation. Whether that's avoiding crowds, whether that's staying 6 feet away from people, whether that's doing teleworking, all of it does that.
Speaker 0: Doctor Fauci also forced Americans to wear masks after admitting that they don't work.
Speaker 2: Right now, people should not be there's no reason to be walking around with a mask. When you're in the middle of an outbreak, wearing a mask might make people feel a little bit better, and it might even block a a droplet, but it's not providing the perfect protection that people think that it is.
Speaker 0: And remember when he said that the COVID vaccine would stop you from getting infected?
Speaker 2: The situation is so clear. The data affirm. If you get vaccinated, you are protected even with the Delta variant.
Speaker 0: And all voices of dissent were silent. A Republican president and Democratic president and their political parties and their members of congress made the same choice to hand the keys of our nation over to doctor Fauci. Then they stood by and watched as he destroyed our schools, our churches, our businesses, and our economy. Under their watch, we ended up having the highest death rate from COVID in the world. Throughout the pandemic, I was posting scientific evidence and warning that doctor Fauci was wrong about many of these issues.
And to silence that criticism, government officials and their allies in the media branded me as a conspiracy theorist and deplatformed me and heavily censored people from the mainstream and social media.
Speaker 2: This week, some of the biggest names in the anti vax movement descended on DC for a rally to protest vaccine mandates.
Speaker 0: And now doctor Fauci is finally admitting that the Wuhan lab leak is not, after all, a conspiracy theory.
Speaker 2: The most likely origin is a jumping of species. I still do think it is at the same time as I'm keeping an open mind that it might be a lab lead.
Speaker 0: Of course, I already knew this because I literally wrote the book on this incident. So the next time that the going gets rough, who do you want to have the power? We, the people, or the 2 political parties that got almost everything wrong. It's time to forge a new path together. If you wanna see that happen, please donate to my campaign.
Our filing deadline is February 29th. Whether it's $1 or $5 or $100, every dollar you donate will allow America to break free of the shackles of the 2 party system. I wanna give you back your country. I wanna give you back the power of self governance and restore our nation as the world's exemplary democracy. Democracy.
I wanna restore our moral authority across the globe. Join me and declare your independence.
@MTGrepp - Marjorie Taylor Greene Press Release (Parody)
RFK Jr will Make America Healthy Again. I can’t wait for him to take things over
@DschlopesIsBack - Gain of Fauci
Who else wants to see Robert Kennedy Jr. completely dismantle the corrupt FDA? 🙋♂️ https://t.co/CaVNcE4JXw
@catsscareme2021 - Jessica Rojas 🇺🇸💪
To all the Doctor's against RFK, Jr becoming the head of HHS, I have one simple question for you.. When was the last time you held a crying Mother of a vaccine injured child? I'll wait. https://t.co/4qjwIVBucn
@RealAlexJones - Alex Jones
Ultimate RFK Jr. Clip! This Is Why He Needs To Be Confirmed! Those Who Are Against RFK Jr. As HHS Secretary Want US Citizens To Be Chronically Sick And Die! Alex Jones Is Covering The RFK Jr. Hearing With Huge Guests TUNE IN NOW! https://t.co/TdxbXeBzbe https://t.co/pJWmkGqbY1
Video Transcript AI Summary
My campaign aims to unite Americans across party lines to address the chronic health epidemic affecting our children. We need radical transparency in health agencies, ensuring that information generated with taxpayer money is accessible without redactions. The alarming rise in chronic illnesses and allergies among children is linked to environmental toxins, and we must set aside political differences to tackle this issue together. I have the experience and knowledge to drive change, having litigated against these agencies and authored six books on the subject. My commitment is to improve public health without fear of vested interests. We are attracting talented individuals to the Department of Health and Human Services, eager to make a difference for our country.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: When I launched my campaign, it was about uniting Americans, Democrats and Republicans. There's no issue that should unite us more than this chronic health epidemic. There's no such thing as Republican children or Democratic children. These are our kids. Sixty six percent of them are damaged.
I know what a healthy kid looks like. I don't think anybody is going to be able to do this like I have Because of my peculiar experience, because I've litigated against these agencies. When you litigate against them, you get a PhD in corporate capture and how to unravel it. I've written 6 books about these agencies. I know a lot about them, and I know how to fix it.
And there's nobody who will fix it the way that I do because I'm not scared of vested interest.
Speaker 1: Thank you for your decades long advocacy for a clean environment, for children's health. I can't say is I'm surprised by the hostility on the other side. I'm highly disappointed in it. I don't know if you remember when you called me up and you were contemplating setting your political differences aside, joining forces with President Trump on an area of agreement, addressing chronic illness, trying to find the root cause of all these problems facing this nation. My first response was, Bobby, this is an answer to my prayers.
We need to get to the answers of this, but even more, we need to heal and unify this divided nation. I'm not necessarily the most optimistic guy because we've got enormous challenges facing this nation, but I thought, wow, Here's somebody from the left, somebody I don't agree with on many issues politically, coming together with President Trump, and focusing on an area of agreement. So something that the American people desperately want. Finding out the answers. What has caused autism?
What is causing chronic illness? Miss Kennedy, I know I think I've come to know what's in your heart. I think I know the personal and political price you've paid for this decision. I just I want to say publicly, I thank you for that. I truly appreciate what you're doing here.
Can't we come together as a nation and do this? Can we do Aren't aren't you aren't you getting tired of this? I'm getting tired of this. So again, miss Mister Kennedy, I I need to enter in the record. These This is just These are just 11 letters of support signed by 63000 people, thousands of doctors, from from the American associate or Association of American Physicians and Surgeons, Independent Medical Alliance, the North Carolina Physicians and Freedom Group, Governor Jeff Landry from Louisiana.
These are Americans, non partisan. A lot of a lot of these people, I I know because I've, you know, advocated with you. A lot of them are Democrats. They put their political differences aside. So, mister chairman, I'd like to enter this in the record.
Without objection. I I also do want to, mister mister Kennedy, as long as I have you here, I've written over 70 oversight letters to the federal health agencies under the Biden administration. I've virtually gotten squat out of them, okay? What I get is we get, for example, 50 pages of Anthony Fauci's emails redacted. By the way, the latest 1 was 17 pages.
Instead of issuing a health alert on the myocarditis they knew was impacting young men, early in 2021, instead of issuing an alert on the health alert network, they developed 17 pages of talking points. This was given to the public under a 4 request. They had to go to court. They've got a new way of redacting. They don't black things out.
They just give you white pages. You don't even know what they have redacted. So again, I've issued a subpoena now to cover the information I've I've requested in 70 oversight letters. My question to you is, as as Secretary of HHS, will you honor these requests from Congress? And will you make HHS transparent?
Speaker 0: Yeah. My approach, HHS, as I said before, Senator, is radical transparency. Democrats and Republicans ought to be able to come in and get information that was generated at taxpayer expense that is owned by the American taxpayer. They shouldn't get redacted documents. Public health agencies should be transparent.
And if we want Americans to restore trust in the public health agencies, we need transparency. The, you know, I want to say something about what you first said. When I launched my campaign, it was about uniting Americans, Democrats and Republicans. There's no issue that should unite us more than this chronic health epidemic. There's no such thing as Republican children or Democratic children.
These are our kids. Sixty six percent of them are damaged. I know what a healthy kid looks like because I had so many of them in my family. I didn't know anybody with a food allergy growing up, peanut allergy. Why do 5 of my kids have allergies?
Why are we seeing these explosions in diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, neurological diseases, depression, all these things that are related to toxins in the environment? Why can't we just agree with each other to put differences about so many issues, intractable issues aside as a we're going to end this? I don't think anybody is going to be able to do this like I have Because of my peculiar experience, because I've litigated against these agencies. When you litigate against them, you get a PhD in corporate capture and how to unravel it. I've written 6 books about these agencies.
I know a lot about them, and I know how to fix it. And there's nobody who will fix it the way that I do because I'm not scared of vested interests. I don't care. I'm not here because I want a position or a job. I have a very good life and a happy family.
This is something I don't need. I want to do this because we're going to fix it. And the other thing is, we are attracting now a caliber of people to HHS like never before in history. And they're entrepreneurs. They're disruptors.
They're innovators of immense talent that are walking away, many of them from growing concerns. They're not coming there or positioned. They're coming there because they want to save our country. And they're from across the political spectrum. And all these Democrats are opposed to me for partisan issues.
They used to be my friends. Agreed with me on all the environmental issues that I've been working on for my whole career. Now they're against me because anything that president Trump does, any decision he makes has to be lampooned, derided, discredited, marginalized, vilified.
Speaker 1: We need to move on.
Speaker 2: These are just excerpts of the ongoing live hearings right now with the confirmation of ROK Junior. He is knocking out of the park. The Democrat deep state pharma pimps are lying. They are scared. You're watching the deep state burn down in the lifetime in front of you.
This is just incredible. We're covering also Trump's amazing ninth day in office, the return of the republic. I am live on air right now at Real Alex Jones on x with a live feed. Gavin McGinnis, Steven Crowder, Joe Biggs, Jay Sixer, former political prisoner, exclusive on with us and so much more today. Be sure and join us.
Steven Crowder is coming on. It just goes on and on. Be sure and join us live. I'm shooting this right before the show starts. We're already putting clips out on x.
You can also follow me, at AJN live as our backup network. We're still trying to shut down Infowars right now. But join me right now on the live feed and share these reports because you're the Paul Revere's. You are the reason we're kicking global ass and winning the info war. Folks, I'm not funded by any big corporations or anybody.
I am funded by viewers and listeners because over the years they would target our sponsors and threaten them to take them away. We direct sell high quality products, supplements, mementos, clickable knives, patriot gear at the allyshipstore.com. But the supplements are some of the best you're gonna find anywhere. And we have this new product that boosts your immune system with all the known concentrated herbs and compounds. Atomic defense, meaning, you know, nuke the bad guys boost your immune system ahead of all the things that are going on.
It's so good for you. The ingredients are incredible. It's our newest product at the alexjonesstore.com, and then it funds our operation. There's a political, cultural, spiritual immune system to fight the globalist, a true three sixty win. And out of the gates, it's 40% off introductory offer.
You take this. It's good for your whole body. You take it all the time, but particularly in the fall and winter. Everybody needs atomic defense, the alexschoedsstore.com.
reSee.it AI Summary
I defended RFK Jr.'s stance on vaccines during his confirmation hearing, emphasizing the need for open debate rather than blind submission to government authority. I criticized the reluctance to engage in nuanced discussions, which fosters public distrust in government. It's essential to acknowledge the complexities of the issue instead of simply dismissing differing viewpoints.
@TheChiefNerd - Chief Nerd
🔥 Sen. Rand Paul Defends RFK Jr's Vaccine Stance on Day 2 of His Confirmation Hearing "These are the nuances you're unwilling to talk about because they there's such a belief in submission. Submit to the government, do what you're told, there is no discussion. There ought to be a debate. You're not gonna let him have the debate. You're just gonna criticize and say it is this and admit to it or we're not going to appoint you. But it's more complicated than that. And this is why people distrust government. You're unwilling to have these conversations." @SenRandPaul @RobertKennedyJr
Video Transcript AI Summary
Will you assure mothers that the measles and hepatitis B vaccines do not cause autism? If the data supports it, I will. The vaccine discussion is oversimplified. Parents are concerned about giving a hepatitis B vaccine to a newborn when the disease is primarily transmitted through drug use and sex. I vaccinated my children but chose to delay the hepatitis B vaccine until school age. There needs to be an honest debate about vaccines, especially regarding COVID-19, where risks differ significantly between age groups. Healthy children are at minimal risk from COVID. We should remain open-minded about vaccine safety and autism, as we don't fully understand its causes. Science evolves, and we must be humble in our conclusions. The rationale for immediate vaccination against hepatitis B exists, but if a mother's status is known, vaccination can be delayed.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Will you reassure mothers unequivocally and without qualification that the measles and hepatitis B vaccines do not cause autism?
Speaker 1: Senator, I am not going into the agency with any
Speaker 0: That's kind of a yes or no question because so if you're because the data is there. And that that's kind of a yes or no. And I I don't mean to cut you off, but that really is a yes or no.
Speaker 1: If the data is there, I will absolutely do that.
Speaker 0: Now there is the data just because I used to do hepatitis B, as I've said. I know the data is there.
Speaker 1: You know, I think the discussion over vaccines is so oversimplified and dumbed down that we never really get to real truths and it's why people up here are so separated from real people at home. So we talk about hepatitis b. It's a terrible disease. It could lead to liver failures, the chairman said. But the reason you have distrust from people at home, why they don't believe anything you say, they don't believe government at all, is you're telling your my kid to take a hepatitis b vaccine when he's one day old.
You get it through drug use and sexually transmitted. That's how you get hepatitis b. But you're telling me my kid has to take it at one day old. You're not. That's not science.
And so every person with a bit of common sense, even people who don't resist vaccines, I vaccinated all my kids. I believe vaccines are one of the modern miracles beyond all pale. The Speckled Monster is a great book about the introduction of the smallpox vaccine in 17/20 into our country, all miracles. But I'm not a one size fits all. It's not all or nothing.
I chose to wait on my hepatitis B vaccine and we did it when they went to school. Does that make me an awful person? Does that make me an anti vaxxer because I questioned the government dictate of whether I do it? And I'm not speaking for anybody else. I'm only speaking for myself.
But for goodness sakes, let's have an honest debate about these things. The COVID vaccine, if you ask me my opinion, the reporters run up and down the hall and they say, you still anti vaccine? No. I'm pro vaccine. But on the COVID vaccine and on the COVID illness, there was a 1,000 fold or more difference between the elderly and children.
If you don't acknowledge that, you're committing malpractice. You're showing your ignorance. If you say a 6 month old must be mandated to get it, the science is not there. So all this blather about the science says this and the science says that, no. It doesn't.
The science actually shows that no healthy child in America died from COVID. Look it up. No healthy child died from COVID. And so the thing is, is that it's a 1000 fold greater. So if you asked me my advice as a physician, if you were 65 or older or overweight and some other conditions, I would have said, hell, yes.
I'd take the COVID vaccine. The risks of the disease were real and much greater than the vaccine. But if you ask me, should my healthy 6 month old get it? See, these are the nuances you're unwilling to talk about because there's such a belief in submission. Submit to the government.
Do what you're told. There is no discussion. There ought to be a debate. You're not gonna let him have the debate because you're just gonna criticize and say, it is this and admit to it or we're not going to appoint you. But it's more complicated than that.
And this is why people distrust government because you're unwilling to have these conversations. And go home, ask your Democrat young mothers, your Republican young mothers, if they're vaccinating their kid for hepatitis b and they're like, well, do I have to do it on day 1 as this precious little baby? Is there a science to say you shouldn't do it? Probably not, but it's my kid. You know?
It's like, I there isn't clear cut science saying not to, but on autism, there's no good science of anything to show what causes autism. We don't know. It's a profound disease. I know many moms here and dads who have kids with autism. I know them personally.
I've met their kids. But the thing is is they saw their kids developing completely normal, maybe speaking a 100 words go to no words at about 15 months of age. Now, there isn't proof. There isn't proof that the vaccines cause it. That's true.
There isn't proof that it cause it, but we don't know what causes it yet. So should we be at least open minded? We take 72 vaccines. Could it be? I don't know, but we shouldn't just close the door and say we're no longer because we believe so much in submission, we're not going to have an open mind to study these things.
And so it's sort of this crazy notion. Schizophrenia, I would put in the same notion. You have a kid who's completely normal to 18 or 19 and their brain goes haywire. How does that happen? It's the most bizarre disease.
Shouldn't we be open? Could it be our food? It might be vaccines. It might be our food, but autism is more common. I don't know about the schizophrenia statistics, but autism is more common.
Shouldn't we want to be open minded? Instead, we're so close minded and we're so consensus driven that the science says this. Well, science doesn't say anything. Science is a dispute, and 10 years from now, we could all be wrong. We were told in the beginning, 20 years ago, they did this enormous study and they said, everybody over 50 should take an aspirin.
I thought, well, that's a pretty good idea. It makes sense. But you know what? 20 years later, they measured it and they found if you had no heart disease and you were taking aspirin, your chance of dying from a brain bleed or from a stomach bleed were greater than the risk of heart disease. You have heart disease, they still say take an aspirin.
If you don't, they've changed your mind 20 years later. But would you have all said I was crazy and I should no longer be in public discourse if I had said 20 years ago, I don't feel like taking an aspirin. I ride my bike all the time. I'm afraid it might hit my head, but that's what country's about. It's what dissent is about.
So just ask you to look at the larger picture and give the guy a break who says, I just want to follow the science where it leads without presupposition. I think really what we have up here is presupposition. You've already concluded. It's absolute that autism isn't caused by it. We don't know what causes autism.
So we should be more humble in what we say. Sorry, I didn't get to a question.
Speaker 0: For the record, if a child was born to a hepatitis B mother, that child may have a 95% chance of becoming a chronic carrier. But if
Speaker 1: the child vaccinate those people and nobody's against that.
Speaker 0: But if
Speaker 1: the child That's a very small percentage in the red area. That is not what we're talking about. 99.9% of kids don't have a hepatitis b mom. And could they wait a while? Could they get vaccinated 3 months or a year?
Yes. So, again, for the
Speaker 0: record, if the mother's hepatitis B status is known, then that can be delayed. The problem is oftentimes, or at least a significant percentage of the time, the mother's status is not known, if she's hepatitis B positive, a vaccine on day 1 of life prevents chronic hepatitis B 95% of the time. So it really depends upon the knowledge of the mother's hepatitis B status. And when they used to do just, okay, we know the mother's status or not, there's mothers that snuck through. Their status was unknown.
We can blame the OBs, but, yeah, Marshall. But for the record, there is an absolute rationale for that. But you are right. If the mother's status is definitively known, then it can be safely delayed.
@MidwesternDoc - A Midwestern Doctor
Many key votes for RFK have said they will not confirm him unless he promises he will say all vaccines are safe b/c the public trusts him and trust in the vaccine program needs to be restored. It's amazing they don't see how much their actions are destroying trust in vaccines.
@WhiteHouse - The White House
🇺🇸 Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s confirmation as HHS Secretary underscores President Trump’s dedication to empowering Americans with healthier lives, restoring trust in public health institutions, and championing medical freedom for all. MAKE AMERICA HEALTHY AGAIN! @RobertKennedyJr https://t.co/3W7ajE36DZ
@WallStreetMav - Wall Street Mav
You will always lose if you try to go against common sense. Bravo RFK Jr and congratulations.
@newstart_2024 - Camus
RFK Jr. talks about religious objections to fetus DNA fragments in the MMR vaccine. Do you need to be religious to refuse that or is it common sense? https://t.co/PTDAt0Ozeb
Video Transcript AI Summary
The current MMR vaccine contains millions of DNA fragments created from aborted fetal tissue, which some people object to on religious grounds. These individuals should be treated with compassion, especially in healthcare settings. One failure of the CDC is not informing doctors that no child should die of measles. Prior to the vaccine's introduction in 1963, there were 400 measles deaths annually out of up to two million cases.
While the MMR vaccine doesn't contain fetal cells, it does contain DNA fragments from a fetal cell line originating from a 1960s abortion. Some people have religious objections to this. During a measles outbreak, some individuals felt like they were treated as pariahs in hospitals due to their religious beliefs. Everyone should have a choice and still be treated with respect, regardless of religious objections.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We also understand that some people don't do that. The MMR vaccine that we current yield currently use has over has millions of particles from or created from aborted fetal tissue, millions of DNA fragments, and there are people who have religious objections toward those, and those people should be treated with compassion. If they come to a hospital and they're sick, we need to know how to treat them. And one of the failures of the CDC in the past is they weren't telling doctors no kid should die of measles in this country. Even in 1963, before the introduction of the vaccine, there were four hundred deaths a year, and there were up to two million measles cases.
So it's, only very, very sick kids should die from measles. You know? Nobody should.
Speaker 1: There's some that were saying that the rubella portion of the vaccine, and you're talking about the produce from the fetal cell line originated from an abortion that took place in the sixties, but the MMR vaccine doesn't contain the cells in its final form.
Speaker 0: It doesn't contain cells, but they it contains DNA fragments.
Speaker 1: Got it. Got it. And so that's your point.
Speaker 0: Yeah. So and people have religious objections to that. And although I might not share those objections, I I respect them, and I think those people, you know, a lot of the men and I said, told me, and I went down there and spent time with the community during the outbreak. And they said they didn't wanna go to the hospital because they were treated as pariah. They said we were treated like lepers there.
And that should not be part of American health care. If somebody comes in, if they have religious objection, we should still be treating them.
Speaker 1: And your big point is a choice.
reSee.it AI Summary
Del Bigtree emphasizes the fundamental right to control our own bodies, arguing that true freedom includes the ability to make choices about what goes into ourselves and our children. He expresses concern over government mandates that force vaccinations on children, suggesting that such actions reduce them to mere property of the state. He criticizes the treatment of individuals as livestock subjected to untested technologies, asserting that this situation must come to an end.
@newstart_2024 - Camus
POWERFUL TRUTH from Del Bigtree "What greater fight for freedom exists than the right to control your own body? If you don’t decide what goes into you—or your children—then you are NOT free. If the government can force injections on your kids against your will, deny them education, and override your choice, then your children are nothing but PROPERTY of the state. That’s not freedom—that’s farming. We are being treated like livestock, lined up and injected with untested tech like mRNA, despite the disasters we’ve already seen. This ends NOW."
Video Transcript AI Summary
"What greater fight for freedom is there than to have control over your own body? And up until the point where your children are 18, you get to make that decision for them too. If not, if that is not the case, then you don't have freedom. If you don't decide what's going into your child, then your child is property of the US government. If they can inject your children beyond your will and there's nothing you can do about it, they can't get the education your taxes are paying for, then we have been reduced to nothing more than farm animals being lined up by Farmer Joe and vaccinated at will with any crazy technology they can come up with like mRNA technology which we know has been disastrous and skipped its safety trials. We are fighting to put all that to an end."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What greater fight for freedom is there than to have control over your own body? Is there anything more important? Please write in if you think there's something more important than having control over your own body and deciding what goes into it. And up until the point where your children are 18, you get to make that decision for them too. If not, if that is not the case, then you don't have freedom.
If you don't decide what's going into your child, then your child is property of the US government. There's no other way to look at it. If they can inject your children beyond your will and there's nothing you can do about it, they can't get the education your taxes are paying for, then we have been reduced to nothing more than farm animals being lined up by Farmer Joe and vaccinated at will with any crazy technology they can come up with like mRNA technology which we know has been disastrous and skipped its safety trials. We are fighting to put all that to an end.
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m witnessing a coordinated effort against RFK Jr. just 48 hours before a Senate hearing aimed at his ouster. Big Pharma's lobby, BIO, allocated $2 million to undermine him due to his transparency demands threatening their profits. The timing of various pressures, including a press conference by Bernie Sanders, indicates a strategic campaign. The hearing, chaired by a BIO ally, lacks fairness, with no defense witnesses. This situation highlights a broader issue of unelected powers manipulating the removal of officials who challenge them. Our democracy must remain intact.
@sayerjigmi - Sayer Ji
🚨 HAPPENING NOW: 48 HOURS before Senate hearing designed to topple RFK Jr. Big Pharma's own meeting minutes from April reveal executives explicitly planned to "go to The Hill and lobby that it is time for RFK Jr to go" Thursday's Senate hearing is their coup finale. 🧵👇
@sayerjigmi - Sayer Ji
1⃣The smoking gun: BIO (Big Pharma's lobby) allocated $2 million—HALF their cash reserves—for a campaign against Kennedy just 2 months into his tenure. Why? Kennedy's transparency demands and safety reviews threatened to "render their current profit model obsolete." 💰 Read @lifebiomedguru's @brownstoneinst report on the BIO memo: The Plot to Get RFK https://brownstone.org/articles/the-plot-to-get-rfk/
The Plot to Get RFK ⋆ Brownstone Institute
On the eve before US Senate reconvenes, a memo plotting removal of US Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. leaked.
brownstone.org
@sayerjigmi - Sayer Ji
2⃣The coordination is undeniable: ♦️April: BIO plans congressional pressure campaign ♦️August-Sept: Suddenly 1,000+ HHS employees demand resignation ♦️Sept 9: Bernie Sanders holds "Vaccines Work" press conference ♦️Sept 12: Sanders publishes Guardian op-ed calling for RFK's removal
@sayerjigmi - Sayer Ji
3⃣Foreign fingerprints everywhere: ♦️UK-based CCDH planned "black ops" against RFK Jr. since 2024. Their strategic docs identified The Guardian as key platform for narratives. ♦️Sanders' Guardian op-ed wasn't journalism—it was the execution of a foreign influence operation.
@sayerjigmi - Sayer Ji
4⃣Thursday's Senate hearing chair? Senator Cassidy—who BIO specifically identified as an "emerging influential advocate" back in April. The same lobbyists who planned Kennedy's ouster now have their ally holding the gavel. This isn't oversight—it's orchestrated theater.
@sayerjigmi - Sayer Ji
5⃣The witnesses testifying Thursday (ousted former CDC director Susan Monarez, Ph.D., and recently resigned CDC CMO Debra Houry, MD., M.P.H) are the same figures who've been calling for Kennedy's resignation in the coordinated media blitz. RFK Jr. was not invited to participate. No defense witnesses. No fair process. Just a predetermined outcome dressed up as "radical transparency." Hearing link: https://www.help.senate.gov/hearings/restoring-trust-through-radical-transparency-reviewing-recent-events-at-the-centers-for-disease-control-and-prevention-and-implications-for-childrens-health
Restoring Trust Through Radical Transparency: Reviewing Recent Events at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and Implications for Children’s Health | The U.S. Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor & Pensions
Full Committee Hearing on September 17, 2025 at 6:00 AM
help.senate.gov
@sayerjigmi - Sayer Ji
6⃣This is bigger than RFK Jr. This is about whether unelected power brokers can stage-manage the removal of officials who threaten their profits. If they succeed Thursday, any reformer is vulnerable to the same treatment. But MAHA can't be ousted—the movement is unstoppable. Our democracy is not for sale. @MAHA_Action
@sayerjigmi - Sayer Ji
7⃣📖 READ THE FULL EXPOSÉ: https://sayerji.substack.com/p/the-coup-how-big-pharmas-2-million 🇺🇸 TAKE ACTION NOW: Show your support for @SecKennedy today by contacting your Congressmen in ONE EASY STEP below through the health freedom platforms below: 🔹Children's Health Defense: Tell your elected officials you stand with RFK Jr. and MAHA https://childrenshealthdefense.org/community/show-your-support-wear-it-share-it-take-action-and-rally-for-rfk-jr/ @ChildrensHD 🔹 Stand for Health Freedom: Kennedy stood firm—tell your senators you stand with him https://standforhealthfreedom.com/actions/kennedy-firm/ @standforhealth1 Tag, comment, and share this! RT PLEASE! 🚨DIVE DEEP BY READING THE BREAKING EXPOSE: THE COUP: How Big Pharma's $2 Million War Chest Bought This Thursday's Senate Hearing https://sayerji.substack.com/p/the-coup-how-big-pharmas-2-million
THE COUP: How Big Pharma's $2 Million War Chest Bought This Wednesday's Senate Hearing
⏳ With Just 48 Hours Left, America Faces a Scripted Hearing Masquerading as Oversight
sayerji.substack.com
Show Your Support: Wear It, Share It, Take Action and Rally for RFK Jr!
This September, we celebrate the birthday of Children’s Health Defense. As part of our birthday, we are also honoring our founder and former Chairman, HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
childrenshealthdefense.org
Kennedy stood firm in the Senate. Tell your Senators you stand with him - STAND FOR HEALTH FREEDOM
Facebook Twitter Pinterest Print
standforhealthfreedom.com
THE COUP: How Big Pharma's $2 Million War Chest Bought This Wednesday's Senate Hearing
⏳ With Just 48 Hours Left, America Faces a Scripted Hearing Masquerading as Oversight
sayerji.substack.com
@sayerjigmi - Sayer Ji
@SecKennedy @G_W_Forum @RenzTom @standforhealth1 @ChildrensHD Correction: the hearing date is Wednesday, Sept 17th 10:00am: https://www.help.senate.gov/hearings/restoring-trust-through-radical-transparency-reviewing-recent-events-at-the-centers-for-disease-control-and-prevention-and-implications-for-childrens-health
Restoring Trust Through Radical Transparency: Reviewing Recent Events at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and Implications for Children’s Health | The U.S. Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor & Pensions
Full Committee Hearing on September 17, 2025 at 6:00 AM
help.senate.gov
reSee.it AI Summary
For decades, the narrative around vaccines and their potential link to brain injuries has been manipulated, with terms like "mentally retarded" replaced by "autism" to obscure the truth. Medical researcher @MidwesternDoc highlights how PR campaigns have shaped public perception, particularly during the COVID vaccine rollout. Despite evidence suggesting vaccine-related injuries, the CDC and media have perpetuated a narrative that dismisses these concerns. As trust in health authorities declines, there’s a growing movement to reclaim medical transparency and address these long-buried truths.
@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊
For decades, vaccines were recognized to cause brain injury and mental retardation. So “retarded” was banned, the injuries were relabeled as autism, and autism’s ambiguity was used to hide it all. Lived experiences were turned into word games. But the paper trail shows it was never an accident. In this report, @MidwesternDoc exposes the games that have been played to hide vaccine injuries for generations. 🧵 THREAD
@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊
The information in this thread comes from the work of medical researcher @MidwesternDoc. For all the sources and details, read the full report below. https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/erasing-encephalitis-why-vaccine
Erasing Encephalitis: Why Vaccine Brain Injuries Became Autism
For decades, cunning public relations tactics have buried a flood of vaccine brain injuries. Seeing through these deceptive strategies equips you to uncover the lies shaping every corner of our lives.
midwesterndoctor.com
@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊
Propaganda works. In fact, it’s one of the most powerful invisible forces in modern society. Professional PR firms create narratives that most people believe, even when they very obviously go against our self-interest. And most people never notice it’s happening. The COVID vaccine roll out was the largest PR campaign of our lifetime.
@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊
Many of our modern cultural beliefs didn’t emerge naturally—they were planted. When a belief requires a massive PR campaign to sustain it, odds are it wouldn’t exist without that campaign. Case in point: “Vaccines don’t cause autism.” All of the anecdotal evidence points to at least a correlation between vaccines and autism. But the propaganda has convinced a massive amount of people to ignore what they’ve seen with their own eyes.
@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊
RFK Jr., backed by Trump, came into his position as HHS secretary with a simple mission: enforce existing vaccine safety laws, open the data, and require real trials before approval. These things shouldn’t be controversial. But instead of support, he was met with media smears and sabotage.
@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊
When the CDC director refused to remove officials who blocked transparency, she was fired. And then those officials resigned anyway. One of them, Dr. Demetre Daskalakis, tried to frame RFK Jr. as waging a “war on science” on his way out. When the spotlight shifted to Daskalakis, his private life exploded into public view. Photos surfaced of Daskalakis in fetish outfits with other men—some with satanic symbols. The backlash was fierce. But all the while he appeared to be living in a bubble, never expecting the backlash that followed his statements and the revelation of his private life. As the public tried to process how the CDC ignored mountains of vaccine injury reports, many saw this as a window into why the agency was so hostile to truth.
@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊
And then on X, Rand Paul zeroed in on the problem: the CDC’s zeal around vaccines mirrors a fetish-like obsession that is not supported by data. Meanwhile, the Hepatitis B shot for newborns—one of the most controversial vaccines ever—was defended with a narrative that never made sense. But PR turned it into moral dogma.
@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊
Then Daskalakis went on a media tour. On CNN, he doubled down on using the term “pregnant people.” But on MSNBC, he was suddenly polished, dropping the gender talk, and rolling out sculpted phrases that were critical of RFK Jr. and reeked of PR coaching. Two totally different personas for two different audiences. Classic propaganda.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Dr. Dimitri Dascalakis resigned as director of the National Center on Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, greeted by clapping from hundreds of colleagues and public health workers. He described leaving an environment where the CDC is treated as a tool to generate policies that do not reflect scientific reality and are designed to hurt rather than to improve public health. He recalled learning about Secretary Kennedy’s directive to change the childhood and adult immunization schedules for COVID-19 via Twitter, noting that CDC data supporting the decision were not provided. He said, seven months into the new administration, no CDC subject matter expert from his center had briefed the secretary, calling that situation extremely abnormal. He warned of eugenics rhetoric in the movement and referenced statements about beef tallow and avian flu, insisting this showed dangerous beliefs. He and colleagues raised red flags about dangerous developments in the country.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Joining me now is doctor Dimitri Dascalakis. He just resigned as the director of the National Center on Immunization and Respiratory Diseases. He was clapped out today, I should add, by current and former employees today. You can see him walking out there with flowers. There were hundreds of employees who clapped out the team who resigned.
It's great to see you. I know the last twenty four hours have probably been an incredible whirlwind for you, and I think so many people out there watching are just trying to figure out what is going on. But let and I have a lot to ask you about, but I wanna just start by asking you about what what it felt like today to to walk out there and have so many of your colleagues, so many people clapping for you. What was that moment like?
Speaker 1: So I didn't expect it. I know that we were going to walk out and have some folks clapping, and I expected to see 20 and 20 or 30 people. And instead, there were hundreds and hundreds of people, and also there were folks in the public health service and the commission corps who were saluting us from a distance. And so, I was really overwhelmed. I mean, I think, I was crying walking down that path, both with joy as well as with sadness, because they're the people that make CDC great.
And sort of living where we live now and sort of seeing how public health professionals have been dehumanized, people really need to see that human moment, that the people that they're seeing in those images that you're playing right now are the people who do everything with such enthusiasm and so much love. It's the people that make sure that The US stays healthy and that it stays safe. And so as people, you know, try to dehumanize public health workers through mis and disinformation, Those images are burned in my mind as something that really reminds me just how much CDC should be and could be about love.
Speaker 0: It's such an important point. I had the honor of working for two presidents, and the overwhelming majority of people who work in government are apolitical. They're experts. They're nerds in the best way possible, and that's who runs government. You you wrote this I just read a couple a number of parts of it, but you wrote this incredibly powerful letter.
I read it a couple of times, and I just wanted to ask you about some of the things you said because it was all in your words. You wrote, I am unable to serve in an environment that treats CDC as a tool to generate policies and materials that do not reflect scientific reality and are designed to hurt rather than to improve the public's health. That is a very direct statement, and I think for those watching who are worried, they're worried what are they gonna gain access to, what does it mean, what should they listen to. Tell us more about what does that mean, and and how should people understand it who aren't experts and haven't worked in the CDC?
Speaker 1: No, thanks so much for that question, Jen. And I think I'm gonna start by saying I'm a doctor. So I see patients, I'm a clinician. And when I was in medical school and I finished, we raised our hands and made that Hippocratic Oath that said first to do no harm. And I'm seeing CDC being transformed into a weapon where people are not allowed to share scientific data and that that scientific data is potentially going to be contaminated more and more with ideology.
And so as a clinician, as a doctor, I see that that is harm. And I see that if science isn't able to shine through the ideology, then what we are going to see is a lot of trouble, both in sort of what my health is, what my kids' health is like, but frankly, also national security. So I could no longer be party to seeing the transformation of my brilliant scientists into something that could potentially hurt children.
Speaker 0: What was there one moment that led you to decide you that pushed you over the edge to resolve?
Speaker 1: I mean, you know, it's it's really been a death by a thousand cuts. So I think in my letter, I I have a a list of some of the things that I experienced. I I think that, you know, some of the things that stand out, I think some people may recall that recently Secretary Kennedy put out a directive that changed the childhood immunization schedule and also the adult immunization schedule for COVID-nineteen, making it more restrictive for children. That means limiting access by the way, to making it more restrictive for children and also for pregnant women. And I'm never gonna forget how I learned about it, which was on Twitter.
So I was sitting in a senior leader meeting. I am one of the COVID experts, one of the vaccine experts, and at a senior leader meeting at CDC, my phone blew up and it was people saying, We didn't know that you changed the vaccine schedule. And then they said, There's this video online that you can see. And that's how we learned about it. And then we had to ask for, Can we get some paper?
Can we get something in writing so we can figure out how to implement this directive since all we had was the video? We eventually got the paper and, you know, my job as a scientist is to say, can we also see the data that led to that decision? And that data was never provided to CDC.
Speaker 0: No. Because because it probably wasn't based on data, I I don't think. I mean, you were the medical expert, but that's the core issue here at play, it feels like. One of the things you also said, which which I I wasn't aware of, is that you said in your letter we are now seven months into the new administration, and no CDC subject matter expert from my center has ever briefed the secretary. And I've never worked in the CDC, but I spent a lot of time in government, and I can tell you that it's completely abnormal.
It is the experts who should be providing the information updates, and most presidents want that information. Most secretaries want that information. But how abnormal is that? Like, how often would the secretary be briefed by experts in the CDC?
Speaker 1: It's extremely abnormal. And so I think, having been in federal government for, five years and local government, for, a long time as well, experts are are really, sort of the the the the key, individuals that brief principals, so brief the secretary and secretary like individuals so that they're able to really guide their thinking around policy. So it is true that my center covers measles, COVID, flu, polio. I have a long list of things that the secretary really should be briefed about. And I'll also add that I had the opportunity to to interact with some of his staff from the office of the secretary in in big senior leader meetings, where I explicitly said, we have never briefed the secretary on anything.
Yeah. We really appreciate the opportunity. Measles, obviously is something that, he has said a lot about. I have no idea where he's getting that information, but it's not from CDC experts.
Speaker 0: Probably not from medical experts, I suspect, if it's not aligned with your thinking. You you also said I know I keep bringing up your letter because it was so powerful. Everybody should read it. We'll post it. It's you say eugenics play plays prominently in the rhetoric being generated.
I think anybody who's been paying attention would agree with you. But from from your perspective, tell us more about what you mean by that.
Speaker 1: Yeah. I mean, I think that the whole, rhetoric behind the movement that secretary secretary Kennedy thinks that he's launched is really that only the strong survive. So whether it's cutting social programs that are so that are important to children, whether it's cutting access to food. So, you know, making America healthy means good food. So, you know, cutting things like food benefits for children seems like it's not a really good idea to be able to achieve that end.
So I think that, and he clearly has a belief, if he actually does believe in viruses and bacteria, which I don't know if he actually does, and the fact that they exist. But he has this belief that sometimes infection is better than vaccine because it creates, I think, the people who survive are the people who should continue to propagate the species. I'm never going to forget, there was an interview that he did at a restaurant talking about the importance of using beef tallow in in french fries, and in that interview, he was talking about his desire to have an avian flu burn through chickens, and the chickens that survive, they're the ones that should be bred. That is that's those are the words that he said. They're available to watch.
And he said because those chickens have the superior genetics. And then one minute later, he said that the president also has superior genetics. So, I mean, from my perspective, as someone, who, you know, has sort of the cultural background of, of, you know, a grandfather who was killed fighting, fascism in Greece, that's sort of, like, embedded in my brain, and I heard that. And I'm like, so that's what this is all about. So, you know, if there are, kids who, who, get infected and do well, that's great.
We shouldn't be giving them vaccines, I guess, so that, we can really propagate the strongest of the species. I feel like what he said about chickens is what he believes about people, and that's scary, and America should know that. So it is a major this is like there is a fundamental thing happening here that I think we all resigned, the three of us, doctor Hari, myself, and doctor Jernigan, to raise the red flag that something is extremely wrong and dangerous in this country.
Speaker 0: It is so powerful what you're doing. I think people are so scared out there. Public health is such an important part of our society and our community. And I I have no doubt I have a great grandfather who's he's passed away, but who also was a doctor. I feel very connected to you.
I have no doubt he would be very, very proud of you. Thank you for being so vocal and for being here with us tonight. I really appreciate it.
@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊
@MidwesternDoc Read the full deep-dive from @MidwesternDoc—it will change how you see vaccine narratives forever. midwesterndoctor.com/p/erasing-ence…
@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊
@MidwesternDoc RFK Jr. hit back on Fox News. He revealed that Daskalakis directly blocked federal aid to Texas during a measles outbreak after RFK Jr. requested it. Let that sink in. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eA93V5Kc8BU
@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊
Daskalakis also stonewalled vaccine safety data for seven months and ran the system that was capturing <1% of COVID vaccine injuries. It was malpractice. So the exact same officials who claimed RFK Jr. would unleash a measles catastrophe actively sabotaged the measles response in Texas. Their goal has never been about public health. They’ve been protecting the vaccine program—and weaponizing outbreaks for political gain. In lockstep, the media played their role.
@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊
@MidwesternDoc This duplicity runs deep. Orwell warned that language defines thought. Change the words, and you change what people can even conceive of. With vaccines, this was weaponized through slippery phrases like “safe and effective”—never defined, yet endlessly repeated.
@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊
Before censorship took over, vaccine encephalitis and brain injury were openly documented in journals and even discussed in the media. In the 1980s, doctors openly admitted vaccines could leave children “mentally retarded.” But that language was later banned—and replaced. The word was attacked in the 2000s and in 2010 Obama signed a law outlawing the term “mentally retarded.” “Mentally retarded” became “autism.”
Video Transcript AI Summary
This Donahue episode centers on immunizations, especially DPT (Diphtheria, Pertussis, Tetanus) and the pertussis controversy. Parents describe severe reactions linked to vaccination, including Scott Grant’s brain injury after the DPT shot and Abra’s seizures after her second DPT, with testimony that experts could not prove absolute causality. Wisconsin passed legislation identifying vaccine lot numbers and manufacturers after litigation. Speakers debate whether the pertussis component can be made safer—one doctor says there has been no improvement in pertussis vaccine for forty years—while others praise vaccines for eradicating polio, measles, and rubella. Critics argue doctors withhold risk information; advocates call for better information, reporting of adverse reactions, and a federal mandate for lot-number recording. The program also touches on Reye’s syndrome and aspirin use, swine flu vaccine and Guillain–Barré, opt-out states (about 21), and international experiences (Sweden/West Germany).
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Did you give your baby the DPT shot?
Speaker 1: Yes, I did.
Speaker 0: Is, what is your understanding? Were you obliged to give the baby the DPT shot or was it a voluntary decision?
Speaker 1: Oh, a little bit of both, but I think I would have given it to him. I like to protect him against every disease that I can.
Speaker 0: Right. At what age was, was he six months when you got the, when was the first shot?
Speaker 1: Oh, can't remember.
Speaker 2: I can't either,
Speaker 0: I know.
Speaker 1: He's had so many. I really can't remember.
Speaker 0: Yeah. You're aware that there's some, you know, it's not, it's not terrifying enough now to be a parent. They're telling us. You know what I mean?
Speaker 1: We're worried about other things.
Speaker 0: Yeah. And they're suggesting that maybe DPT has
Speaker 3: I really didn't know that
Speaker 1: until we were discussing it right before the show. I didn't know there were so many dangerous side effects.
Speaker 0: Okay. Now we're not going to pretend on this program to solve all of the problems. It is possible that we will make you more anxious than you would have liked to be. It's possible that you you'll wish by the time this program is over that you had arrived here on the day we had the male strippers. I mean, that's a lot easier show to handle.
So let us make it clear that while we are not claiming to be writing here and there are no Solomons at hand, we do have a professional group of people here who will probably differ on some of the issues about which we will speak. And we ask you to stay with us as a mother of a 22 old person. You may have some more questions. Is she typical, Doctor. Mendelson?
Robert S. Mendelson, pediatrician? Michael Reese, Chicago, big shot doctor who's going to come in again and make the entire medical community hysterical because it is suggested you are an overkiller. You come in and say everything about medicine is bad. You have grandchildren?
Speaker 2: Three grandchildren.
Speaker 0: Have they been immunized?
Speaker 2: They have not been immunized. Nothing? One child had one tetanus shot, but I have to tell you, Phil, that the latest evidence is that the tetanus shot is probably just water. Because in reducing the reactivity of the shot, they have also reduced
Speaker 0: Hi, man.
Speaker 2: In reducing the reaction to the shot, the manufacturers have also reduced the capacity of the shot to produce immunity.
Speaker 0: They diluted it, you mean.
Speaker 2: But the most important thing that was said here today was this lady who said that she didn't know until she came here the dangers of the shots. Because for forty years now doctors have not been telling patients the truth. Important function that your program provides is that we give patients, you give patients, the kind of questions they can put to their doctors. I regard the Donahue show as the best form of medical education Tell
Speaker 0: that to the American Academy of of Pediatrics. Okay.
Speaker 4: Okay, I'm a mother of a three year old that's just starting school and before I took her to school they missed a DPT shot somewhere along the line. She was too sick to get it. Bottom line is they wouldn't let her in school without the DPT shot, which they gave to her to, you know, like recently. You know, they backlogged it. It wasn't put down.
And the schools do not let children in. Ronnie And they run temperatures from them. I think that anything that they run a temperature from can't be good.
Speaker 0: May I see the DPT graphic, Ronnie? We don't want to insult your intelligence. If you're a caring, mother, father, anybody, you know what this is. But let's make sure we know what we're talking about. DPT stands for Diphtheria, Pertussis, and Tetanus.
Pertussis is a whooping cough. And it is the P. Now, now Doctor. Mendelson wants you to know he doesn't think he ought to take this at all, any of it. None of this alphabet soup he thinks you ought to take.
Now, he is not necessarily getting a standing ovation from the American Academy of Pediatrics for that. But let's go
Speaker 2: back Well, that isn't true for Alright,
Speaker 0: some agree, I'm sure.
Speaker 2: But I you cannot claim to have to tell you that next year I've been invited to be the keynote speaker for the American Medical Students Association and this is exactly what I'm going say to them.
Speaker 0: Alright, I'm not saying you're a bad guy. I'm trying to establish that you are at the very least a controversial animal. And I don't think you should necessarily apologize for that. It means that you're raising issues about which there's a considerable disagreement.
Speaker 2: I'm taking this stuff out of the medical journals and trying to
Speaker 5: lay it before the public.
Speaker 0: Let me see that graphic one more time, Ryan. It is the P, pertussis, about which there appears to be the most controversy. And, we'll get into that in a moment. Meet Louis Z. Cooper, MD.
Another big shot from the medical community, Director of Pediatrics, St. Luke's Roosevelt Hospital, New York City, Chairman of the New York Chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics, has been involved in vaccine research for the last twenty years. And what's your opening shot? No pun, Doctor. How do you respond to what's
Speaker 5: Phil, I am grateful that my colleague here gives us a chance to tell this audience how exciting it is to be part of a community where we don't fear polio, where we don't fear measles, where we don't fear rubella, where we don't fear pertussis. The way we did when I was a boy and the way we did when I started medical school. I lived through watching patients die and watching patients be critically and crucially injured for many years with the illnesses that now most of this audience don't know anything about except what they read in textbooks. And that's a very happy circumstance due to vaccines.
Speaker 6: But there are a number
Speaker 0: here we go. J. Anthony Morris, PhD. Doctor. Morris has been with us before.
Here is the man who said to President Ford and others during the nineteen seventy six Yes. Swine flu epidemic. Remember when the president got his shot in the Oval Office and everybody ran out? Guillain Barre was just one of the suggested unfortunate reactions that literally hundreds, thousands of people suffered following that immunization program, about which Doctor. Morris, who was then with the VA, is that right?
Food and Drug Administration. You were with the FDA, disagreed. You should also know that he lost his job, and he is a vaccine researcher. What is
Speaker 7: If your make the assumption that what Doctor. Cooper said is so, that does not do away with the point raised by that lady. Now in a recent editorial, in the most recent issue of the State Medical Journal of my state, Maryland, there's an editorial there that says, cannot accept the pertussis vaccine as it now is. That is that if there's legislative and public pressure to improve this vaccine, that improvement will take place. So we're not saying that what Doctor.
Cooper says is not so. What we're saying, it could be better. And the dangers that are associated with the use of pertussis vaccine could be done away with.
Speaker 0: What are the dangers?
Speaker 7: The dangers are that you might suffer serious neurologic damage.
Speaker 6: A relative
Speaker 0: Causes seizure in some
Speaker 7: causes seizure. It causes the inability to use muscles as you have in the audience today, Scotty.
Speaker 0: As you know, there was a good deal of publicity in Great Britain about immunization and Fleet Street got on this in the early 70s and boy the hysteria and the friends. Suddenly, Britain went from percentage of eighty percent of the population. Ronnie, this is on visual seven ten, if we can just see the graphic on this. In '19 from '74 from '47 to '74, about eighty percent of the population of Great Britain was immunized. Then the media got on this thing, and much as the Donahue show is doing now, trying very hard to be responsible, unlike apparently what happened in Britain.
And so a significant number of people in The UK backed away from immunization. And guess what? A pertussis epidemic in nineteen seventy seven-seventy eight, significant numbers of whooping cough cases. And in 1980, then, then they got back on it. In 1982, there were fifty thousand pertussis cases in The United Kingdom with twelve deaths.
Okay. Let me tell
Speaker 7: you what happened in my state. Following a broadcast by the NBC concerning pertussis vaccine, there was several months thereafter a public release from the state health department in Maryland saying that there's an outbreak of pertussis in our state. And we believe that this outbreak might have resulted from the reluctance of parents to have their child, children, immunized against pertussis. I got from the State Department of Health the data that they had got off of the computer which served as the basis of the news released. There was no outbreak of pertussis in the state of Maryland.
Why? In the county? And the cases that did occur, occurred in vaccinated children, for the most part, who had received the vaccine according to the recommended procedure. So they said there were forty one cases of pertussis. They could not have been more than five cases of pertussis.
And each of these five cases occurred in children who had been vaccinated.
Speaker 0: You're suggesting that maybe DPT caused them to get whoop whooping?
Speaker 5: No. I'm not saying that.
Speaker 7: What I'm saying is that when true when parents are aware of the dangers associated with a pertussis vaccine, this awareness does not result in an outbreak of pertussis because they are aware of the dangers of the vaccine. And that's the impression the state of Maryland gave.
Speaker 0: Okay, meet Marge Grant. Mrs. Grant is the mother of Scott Grant who is at hand. Scott is 21 years old, a, these are all polysyllabic words and, I am sure Mrs. Grant that it's okay if I proceed to give these folks just a very, very brief
Speaker 2: Sure.
Speaker 0: Evaluation of, Scott's condition. He's a spastic quadriplegic, and you are saying that in fact twenty one years ago today, we should say that, Scott is a, Scott is, although certainly, somewhat limited in his own motor ability and mental capacity is still a real good boy and obviously a very good looking young man who the audience should know has the motor activity development of about a nine month old.
Speaker 8: Exactly.
Speaker 0: And the mental capacity of about?
Speaker 8: Seven years of age in understanding only.
Speaker 0: And it was 21 it was twenty years ago today?
Speaker 8: Phil, it was exactly. It's exactly twenty one years ago this morning at 05:30 that he reacted severely after his third shot which was given twelve hours earlier. The reaction was
Speaker 0: The shot, the DPT?
Speaker 8: The DPT, right. It was the third shot he received on the December 7. And the following morning around 05:30 he woke up earlier than usual and I was fixing his breakfast and all of a sudden he was in his infancy and he clenched his fist and his head went back and he fairly yelled like as if to say I'm falling, catch me. And to this very day he's very sensitive to falling.
Speaker 0: Alright. Now you attempted to litigate Scott's case and were not successful. Apparently, your witnesses were not able to convince the judge or the jury of the absolute causality between the DPT and Scott's seizure.
Speaker 8: Really that wasn't the issue at the time of trial. I could not prove that Scott had received Park Davis's product because even though the doctor at the time he administered it told me it was Quadrigine which was BPT plus polio combined, and it was put out by Park Davis. He did not record it on Scott's record.
Speaker 0: Oh, I see. So the question, the gray area in the court then, that was not what caused his medical condition, but what brand product was.
Speaker 8: Right. So I lost my suit against Park Davis. However, we had five experts that did indeed treat Scott and see Scott, and they said it was indeed the duty You that hurt
Speaker 0: are also proud of the fact that your litigation provoked legislation in the state of Wisconsin, which obliges all immunizations now to be identified by lot number
Speaker 8: and
Speaker 0: manufacturer.
Speaker 8: That's only as of the last year, and that also includes the fact that now we do have a personal conviction waiver that we do not have to take in the state of Wisconsin, but it was a group of us that petitioned the legislation.
Speaker 0: Right. Do you understand Doctor. Cooper's point here that, much as we can empathize with the pain and the, significant interruption in your own life, family life, in every way that this has caused you, he wants you to know that there are thousands and thousands of people out there who've been spared similar difficulty because of immunology. And that this is, that the numbers indicate that while this, while there are questions, certainly when you
Speaker 8: clearly that the government is at fault. The government has not forced the manufacturer to remove the component that's causing this neuroma
Speaker 0: Which one is that?
Speaker 8: The pertussis, the whooping cough component.
Speaker 0: You're convinced that it was the pee and DPT that caused this problem for your ears.
Speaker 8: I have no question, nor did the experts.
Speaker 0: Doctor. Cooper, it does, we do have significant medical testimony indicating that the pertussis feature of DPT is a rather unstable mixture of chemistry about which we really know very little. And Doctor. Morris wants you to know that he thinks that the, that the pertussis problem really almost disappears after two months of age. And you don't give it until the kid is two months.
Speaker 5: Yeah. Well, I, I, I don't know what Tony would say, but pertussis is a problem not just for the two month old, but for children of all ages. It's a bigger problem for the children under a year of age. And one of the reasons we start the vaccine at age two months is to try to provide some degree of protection as soon as possible.
Speaker 0: Yeah.
Speaker 5: I agree with missus Grant that it probably was the pertussis vaccine that caused Scott's awful problem.
Speaker 0: Well, why why do we have the pee then? And why don't we just sell the pee?
Speaker 5: Because because until we can produce a vaccine which is safer than the one we have
Speaker 0: You think we have
Speaker 6: to every pay this? Year we'll
Speaker 5: be saving hundreds and thousands of lives by using what we've got. We need a better pertussis vaccine, and there has to be more research to help us find a better vaccine. That vaccine has been improved very little in thirty years.
Speaker 0: Doctor. Mattison.
Speaker 2: Well, do you think that doctors should tell patients that I'm going to give you the whoopie cough vaccine and if I give it to you, you might turn out to be like Scott with encephalopathy and mental retardation and cerebral palsy and convulsions and a shock like state. Do you think that doctors should be telling that to patients or should doctors be hiding that from patients as they've done for forty years? Bob, I don't think doctors should hide anything from Why haven't they been telling that to patients? Why is it that this audience here
Speaker 0: The first woman who stood up said she was not aware of any problem.
Speaker 2: And now now that that information is available, but people can't go to medical journals. Although if they want, they can read Tony Morris's publications. Yep. They can read my
Speaker 6: publications. Part of that,
Speaker 0: doctor Mendelson is I mean, how would you like to be the mother in the pediatrician's office after he says, now we have the DPT, I recommend it because we really diminished. But you should also know, and then he takes out a poster of a child in a wheelchair who's got a mental capacity of seven years at age I 20 mean, what kind of a black male is that?
Speaker 2: Well then if I'm the mother or the father, then I have to ask the pediatrician some questions. I have to say to him, what is the incidence of these reactions? And the pediatrician will then say, it's one in a million. And then you say to the pediatrician, oh, but Doctor Mendelson has shown me evidence from the medical journals that turns out to prove that the incidence of convulsions is one in a hundred. The incidence of severe mental permanent defect is one in a thousand.
And that information is in the medical journals. The only problem is the American doctors don't report it because they're so afraid of malpractice suits. But if you go to the foreign literature, which is now appearing in all the law cases, because now just like just like your case, there are now hundreds of law cases reaching your way through the court.
Speaker 9: Pop, come on.
Speaker 0: Alright. Hang on just a second. Let's get this in. Sweden no longer obliges parents to administer DPT shots. Right?
Sweden is off. West Germany is off. What what about the
Speaker 2: And 21 states in this country.
Speaker 0: Other words, you the option.
Speaker 9: Is that what you're saying?
Speaker 2: Give you the option.
Speaker 0: And here's a woman who ran into the entire bureaucracy of the whole school system because her kid didn't have his card. You know?
Speaker 6: I mean,
Speaker 0: the kid is four years old and gotta have a card.
Speaker 5: Bill, a democratic society is a complex venture. Yeah. And we and I don't know a simple solution. No. But you
Speaker 0: doctor give individual freedom.
Speaker 5: Wait a minute.
Speaker 0: Wait a minute.
Speaker 5: To give individual freedom.
Speaker 6: I wanna
Speaker 0: get you in here. Just one
Speaker 5: also protect folks. In fact, of course,
Speaker 0: give me your pertussis, Doctor Cooper Doctor Cooper said something
Speaker 7: that's very important. There's been no improvement in pertussis vaccine for forty years. There has been no effort on the part of the government enforce this improvement until recently, following that pertussis program that was broadcast by an apparently the within recent months. Following that, I just said before I came here, a notice in my mail that the government is now setting up an organization to improve the pertussis vaccine. That was forced upon them by that broadcast as your broadcast will force them to do something too.
And the Bob Mendelsohn says that the doctor does not inform the dangers associated with the use of this vaccine. That will force the symptoms.
Speaker 0: And you can also get DT, can't you? Yes. You can, in other words, is that an option? I assume that depends on the legislation in the states at which the request is made.
Speaker 2: That's an option. Well, it's an option where the government itself admits that the DTD vaccine probably isn't any good.
Speaker 0: Alright, I'm running a little long here. Promise we'll give you a chance. Honest doctor, we're real good to doctors on this program. I have Wilma Gundy here. Mrs.
Gundy developed receiving the swine flu vaccine six years ago. She's the person who responded to the Ford administration's call, the swine flu is coming, the swine flu is coming, we have to get vaccinated, and she did. She is one of literally thousands of people who contracted this disease, a syndrome, I should call it. And incidentally, more than a 100 lawyers in the justice department have worked overtime just handling the litigation that was provoked by this.
Speaker 10: And we intend to keep them working.
Speaker 0: You, yes, you had the shot on November 1976. And when did you first feel numbness?
Speaker 10: I started feeling numbness three weeks and one day later. 20 on the twenty second day. All at once, my feet and and legs and hands and arms began Okay, to turn
Speaker 0: now we're not trying to scare you to death, we have to get this in Doctor. Cooper. Certainly Mrs. Gundy steps forward as dramatic evidence to the fact that the medical community, even abetted by the President of The United States and an august panel of immunologists and clinicians and researchers, does not necessarily in every case make decision. It certainly appears, first of all, didn't even have any swine flu.
We didn't need the vaccine in the first place. The numbers and the research that went into suggesting that it was coming were flawed. And now steps forward this taxpaying American to say, why should I believe anything?
Speaker 10: Yes, I was not given any information about the amount of benefits versus the risks. When I finally did some research on my own, I found out I had actually twenty eight chances in one thousand of having any benefits at all from the vaccine. And they did not tell me about the risks that were involved. They did not tell me that I might develop a neurological disorder at all. They particularly, and this is where I think that
Speaker 3: they were most
Speaker 10: faulted, routinely the drug companies sent a flyer to the doctors with the vaccine that people who were allergic to feathers should not take this vaccination. I was never given that information.
Speaker 0: Alright.
Speaker 2: Well, people who take the measles vaccine aren't given the information that the measles vaccine can lead to mental retardation. That the German measles vaccine can lead to arthritis.
Speaker 0: Yes. But in some people yeah. Alright. Well, let's see how much sense we can make here with an audience that has more than just a single question for all of you. I'll give you that chance.
Immunology, vaccinations, you know our kids today, DPT, measles, polio, rubella. And if you're not confused confused enough, enough, here come the folks saying maybe aspirin shouldn't be given to children when they have a fever because of Reye's syndrome. I'll tell you, being a parent today is an outright act of courage. And we hope you'll join us.
Speaker 11: I went yesterday to the library when I found out what the topic would be today to find out what I could on immunizations and the dangers. I could find nothing in reader's guide periodicals, which would be the magazine articles on the dangers. The only time I've ever heard anything was through the media, and it was the DPT scare, which petrified me. I thought I had killed my child with immunization. And we don't know what to turn.
You're damned if you do and damned if you don't. You don't know what's the answer? Yes or no?
Speaker 2: I will be happy to send you and anyone else who wants it a free copy of my newsletter that deals with risks of immunizations that gets articles from inside the medical journals which I agree with you are not generally available to the public. I am recommending now that if there's any person in this audience who decides to give their kid a DPT shot, the least they can do is to write down when the kid gets the shot, the name of the manufacturer, the expiration date, and the batch number so that in case something happens later on, they won't get into the situation that you got into. At least they'll know who the hell to sue.
Speaker 0: Doctor Cooper, please.
Speaker 6: Well, let Yeah. Yeah.
Speaker 0: Well, doctor, how just how are you gonna find that out? The doctor The doctor's got the box there when he right. And and I have never seen the doctor show me the box or the bottle or
Speaker 8: How
Speaker 5: do you find that?
Speaker 0: It's just one of the states that obliges the recording of the particular lot number and the manufacturer. So we're getting smart. We're slow,
Speaker 2: but Listen, what do we do in if
Speaker 8: go the doctor and you say, I insist that you record this. And believe me, it is important.
Speaker 5: Yeah. Well, let's get back a couple of issues.
Speaker 0: First of
Speaker 5: all, almost half the vaccine given in this country is given in public programs. It's now the law that anyone who gets a vaccine in a public program has to be given this pamphlet called important information about vaccines.
Speaker 0: Yeah, but you gotta have a magnifying glass to read it.
Speaker 5: Yeah, doc, well you can't read it. But you can't read it.
Speaker 0: No, no, his point is that you can read it.
Speaker 5: Everyone is handed and must receive important information about the vaccines, which includes the risks and the benefits.
Speaker 6: I would suggest that you
Speaker 5: ask your pediatrician for This is
Speaker 8: the crux. The private physician does not have to give you this. And this is why I'm saying it should be a mandate from the federal level that everybody must record information. It'd
Speaker 10: be no good at all.
Speaker 12: Right before I started kindergarten, when I was five, I was given the shots that you're supposed to be given, including the measles. And a little while after I got the measles shot, I developed this thing, my hands would just freeze up in terrible pain, and I would wake up crying. And I remember my mother and I soaking them in water and things. And after this happened, that's when he told me that this could be a side effect. We never knew before.
Speaker 0: Yeah, but obviously you sustained no brain damage. But Doctor Mendelson wants you to know that you came awfully close to the possibility. You
Speaker 2: sure did. And I have to tell you, you've learned a good lesson, which I can't tell you how happy I am is being transmitted today to the entire American population because the doctors haven't told people the truth about DES or ultrasound or X-ray.
Speaker 0: Alright. Now Please don't let's
Speaker 2: they're getting the truth as a result today
Speaker 0: Okay.
Speaker 2: About immunizations.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Let me just get one more guest in here. Meet Emily Jankovich. Mrs. Jankovich is the mother of Abra who is how old?
Speaker 3: She's three half Abra.
Speaker 0: Abra cannot be with us today because apparently she sustains episodic seizure.
Speaker 3: Yes. Abra was normal up till the age of four months and she had her second DPT. And as her parents
Speaker 0: We have a photograph here around her, may they? Oh yes.
Speaker 3: That was, that photograph is when Abra was normal yet, when she was about three months old. And she had had one DPT already and apparently she was alright. We assumed that she was alright. It wasn't until her second DPT that we noticed that there was obviously a problem. The very day she had her DPT shot, she had a seizure.
We didn't know it was a seizure, but we knew something was wrong because she was turning blue and shaking and she was obviously in distress. And so it was my only child, our first child, so but I still knew something was wrong so we rushed to the emergency room and by the time we got there she was alright. We told the doctor that she had had her DPT. Was there any connection? He said, It looks like just a choking incident.
From that point on, for the next nine months, we told every doctor we saw, neurologists included, that she had had her DPT. We felt there was a connection. Well, for two weeks after that initial reaction from our daughter, we didn't see anything. We didn't see anything. There may have been something.
But two weeks later, she had grand mal seizures and she was in critical state for forty eight hours. And to this day, Abra, like Sunday, she had 50 seizures. And she has as many as hundreds of seizures a day. And she is very heavily drugged. She can't walk, she can't talk, she can't even chew, but she is very responsive.
That picture
Speaker 0: And you would not guess that looking at
Speaker 3: She's very responsive to people and she has full motor use, but her brain isn't making the connection that she can use them. So she doesn't walk and she doesn't talk. And she's, thoroughly disabled.
Speaker 0: Have you sued anybody?
Speaker 3: We have a case.
Speaker 6: Pending?
Speaker 0: Yes. Okay, now let's get,
Speaker 3: Something I'd like
Speaker 9: to speak to.
Speaker 0: Yeah, imagine how thrilled all the pharmaceutical companies with this. Now here's the problem. Let's just try, let's, let's, let's try and be responsible here. There's no doubt, nobody's here to say that you're not, that the roulette wheel doesn't spin when you take a vac, when you accept vaccine. The question is what provo what provides the greatest there's all kinds of questions.
What provides the greatest common good? How much is the medical community sharing information with each other about possible problems? How much does the inevitable interest of the pharmaceutical industry weigh in the decision on the part of the physician to administer these? Why does it have to be a law? Should we have the freedom to decide whether or not?
And for the sake of Doctor. Cooper and those who think that we've come a long way to eradicate problems of diseases, here are three mothers who wish they had had the immunization available to them at the time of the The first mother is the mother of a child with measles. Obviously the fever must have gone up and brain damage. The other two mothers you will see on this table were exposed to rubella during pregnancy. This is sad, but this is the other side of this coin.
Roll the table.
Speaker 8: She has brain damage from the measles. And we don't think that she'll ever improve.
Speaker 10: The rubella vaccine came four years too late for us.
Speaker 6: For a woman to have
Speaker 4: a child like this day is senseless tragedy for herself, for her family, for everyone involved in contact with her.
Speaker 0: Alright, the last two children then were victimized by the mother's exposure to rubella during pregnancy. The first child had measles. So now what?
Speaker 3: There are so many things here. When my husband and I talk about this, we realize that vaccinations will always be given. We, we feel that's a fact. But we were uninformed as parents. We went into the doctor's office like every other mother.
I have dozens of friends who have babies and they all went in and got their shots, but not one of them knew there could be devastating results either from the disease or from not, or from the vaccine. So I went in ignorant. I knew nothing about the possible side effects. And we didn't have the option of making the decision as parents, pro and con. We would like to have had the facts and made the decision as the parents of our daughter and lived with the consequences then.
If we had decided on the vaccine, we would live with the consequences.
Speaker 0: There must be real anger about that ignorance. That's what really enrages you.
Speaker 3: Yes, because we know there's cases like we just shown that they have side effects from the disease itself. But we feel too that there are many, many more children who are affected adversely than anyone ever knows. We have been in dozens of hospitals and we have seen children on these children's floors with seizures, learning disabilities, and no one knows why. But even a nurse told us this. She told us that her child had seizures after the DPT but she didn't even know that there could be such a reaction until we told her.
So it's, this is how
Speaker 0: we There are also reports, which these are reports, that there are pediatricians who are giving DPTs and not giving them to their children. Or administering DPTs and taking the pee out of the DPT for their own children. We'll be back in just a moment.
Speaker 4: Was tragic for herself, for her family, for everyone involved in contact with her.
Speaker 0: We're back. Yes ma'am, you'll stand.
Speaker 13: Yes, I know I can have empathy for the lady with her son, but my son had polio and he got polio in November, January the Salk vaccine came out. And I'm sorry it was too late for him, but it's devastating. And I know that some people say, well they got a mild case of polio with the vaccine, but it was nothing like the paralysis.
Speaker 0: That's your son.
Speaker 13: And that my son was lucky he had many operations and he's all right now. But even like penicillin can help some people and someone else can have a reaction.
Speaker 10: Excuse me. There's no way that we would say all vaccines should be done away with. It's just that I think the public needs to be informed. We need to be told the benefits versus the risk. We need to know what we're facing.
Speaker 2: Well, the darker side of the polio vaccine and what nobody knows is that Jonas Salk has pointed out that in the last ten years in this country, two thirds of all the cases of polio have been vaccine induced. How many
Speaker 6: cases is that, Bob?
Speaker 5: Only How many cases, Bob?
Speaker 2: Would you not interrupt me for a second? I know that doctors are used to interrupting patients, but not another doctor.
Speaker 6: I interrupted you. Absolutely. Especially another doctor.
Speaker 5: Chief doctor.
Speaker 0: I think, but let's get, he does make a point that we should also say Sabin is live and the live vaccine and Salk is
Speaker 5: Is inactive.
Speaker 0: Is inactive as we say in the laboratory. Alright. How many was it? They ask.
Speaker 2: Well, how many people know that the European epidemic of polio, there were about twenty or thirty cases in this country. Now, of course, the American doctors will argue that the reason why polio disappeared in this country was because of the vaccine. But then why did it disappear in Europe in the nineteen forties and the nineteen fifties without mass vaccination? Why doesn't it occur in the third world where only ten percent of the people have ever been immunized against polio or anything else?
Speaker 0: That so in other words, we may be fighting a tiger that died.
Speaker 5: That's quite correct. Ask the people in Great Britain. Ask the people in Japan who
Speaker 6: All all all the
Speaker 0: casting Gentlemen, if you please, I've got probably the smartest audience we've ever had.
Speaker 3: I have a question. How long a delayed action, if any, would you connect this with like MS?
Speaker 0: Is MS a possibility? Would multiple sclerosis be one of the possible results?
Speaker 2: As a matter of fact, there's a new publication that just came out from John Hoffman, who's a close associate of Tony Morris's, that gives the references linking MS in later life to the early introduction of live virus vaccines like measles and like some of the others that are live viruses. Now at the present time I would recommend that anybody who has MS or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis or any of those degenerative neurologic conditions of later life carefully review their vaccine histories.
Speaker 10: I would also like to comment to that because in connection with my case, I've been some research.
Speaker 0: Let me tell them once again, Ms. Gundy, that you are a Guillain Barre victim, contracted following the, following your receipt of the, swine flu vaccination
Speaker 10: in I 7AM in the process of writing a book about my experience and in the process I've done considerable research. And from what I have learned, it looks as if immunizations frequently cause autoimmune diseases, not only Guillain Barre syndrome, but lupus, rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis, and other types of things. Now I have no data at this We
Speaker 0: should also say that there's a good deal of evidence suggesting that multiple sclerosis may be the result of distemper in an animal that the victim received during childhood.
Speaker 6: Now,
Speaker 0: none of this is absolutely nailed to the wall. But that's the problem with this. How's a what's a mother to do with all of these balls in the air and nobody really certain
Speaker 10: I would just like to also comment that we had forty six million people vaccine vaccinated with the swine flu shot. And I have written to Ralph Nader's organization. I have written to some of the government organizations trying to get them to do a survey, a long going survey to see if these vaccinations do cause autoimmune diseases or what the reactions are. I can't even get a response because I'm not a doctor. I have no clout.
I'm a nobody.
Speaker 0: Missus Grant, why were you shaking your head?
Speaker 8: Phil, it isn't only with that vaccine. It's with all vaccines. They are not interested in the adverse reactions. As a matter of fact, if I may, I'd like to invite anyone to write to me if they've had an adverse reaction. I'd like to help the government because they don't want to know, but I would like to know.
Speaker 14: I am a mother of three children and I have been informed and I've read up on these things. And I chose not to vaccinate my children, but when they get
Speaker 8: to school, why is it that
Speaker 14: I have to fight for my rights as a mother and the choice I've made?
Speaker 0: Let me just quickly, we're long, but that's a very important question. Are the states in which you either have the totally free decision about whether or not to vaccinate or there's, we're calling them loophole states. States where they're not going to send your child to solitary if you don't have his card, you know? Alright, California. Not all children must be immunized in these states.
Some require religious reasons. Some places there is a bureaucratic humma humma you have to go through to prove that you're this or that. Others it's probably easier. So just for the sake of simplifying this, Colorado, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Louisiana, Maine, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Utah, Vermont, Washington, and Wisconsin. If your state is not on there, it means that your child is going to be left at the kindergarten door feeling very, very much an outcast because he didn't get his immunization shots.
And we'll be back in a moment.
Speaker 10: I would like to say that I think it's the American people's responsibility that they should ask the doctor and the nurses before any injection is given to the child. Should it be given or should
Speaker 8: it not? The doctors don't have time to
Speaker 3: tell you. You should ask.
Speaker 0: The doctors what?
Speaker 10: I'm a registered nurse, and I don't think the doctors have a lot of time to go and say, this is all the things that can happen to your child. I think they should say, that it's the mother's responsibility to say, hey doctor, I would like to know.
Speaker 15: On my last child's DVT shot I did ask. He was not given a P, he was only given a DT. I was not given an answer as to why the P was taken out nor was I given an answer as to what are the chances of whooping cough and can it be cured if my child got it?
Speaker 0: State? Here.
Speaker 5: Bill? Bill, I gotta jump in.
Speaker 2: Yes. You
Speaker 5: know, the issue is one of balance and perspective. And we shouldn't forget there were fifty some thousand cases of polio in 1955. And this year, Bob didn't answer the question. There are seven cases of polio in The United States this year. There have been an average of roughly a dozen for the last six or eight years.
In Great Britain, they've had over a hundred thousand cases of pertussis in the last five years. Five or six percent of those cases of pertussis had convulsions. Five thousand kids were hospitalized. Yes. There were more deaths among the less than one year olds than the others.
Speaker 0: Right.
Speaker 5: There's a couple other points.
Speaker 0: Let's also say that Dade County, Florida, South Florida has sustained of late measles epidemic. Epidemic means millions. That what isn't what it means. There are a significant number of measles cases in Dade County, not the kind of alarming numbers we used to know before the vaccine. But most
Speaker 7: of those cases occurred in vaccinated children.
Speaker 0: Is that right?
Speaker 7: In Dade County.
Speaker 0: Because one would be one would be the amateur analyst would be would conclude that it might have to do with refugees who may not have been inoculated in their home country.
Speaker 2: No vaccine. They're trying to blame it on the refugees, but but what Tony Moore said is absolutely correct. I want to ask you one question. Sure. All your statistics, why doesn't the doctor tell that to the patient?
Why doesn't the doctor say to them, this is your chance on this side,
Speaker 6: this is
Speaker 7: your chance on this side?
Speaker 5: Oh gosh. You know, there's so many hours.
Speaker 2: You know that, we try.
Speaker 6: Why would we try?
Speaker 2: As that nurse
Speaker 0: Doctor, asked. Yeah. I specifically asked. Know this woman stood up to say the doctor doesn't have time and you have said there are so many hours in the day. The feeling we get, not among all the people in your beloved industry, but among many is that your job is to do and to push and to wrap things around our arm and either send us to the hospital or to the drugstore.
Your job is not to talk to us. And that's and it's that attitude that's making life so miserable for so for your whole industry today.
Speaker 8: Bill, absolutely.
Speaker 5: Bill, I think you're right. We have to have doctors who both talk with patients and listen to them. And one of the things we try to train our pediatricians in training is that their most important job is educating parents to be competent parents. That includes all this.
Speaker 2: Well, try, but you don't succeed. Yes.
Speaker 8: Talked about
Speaker 3: it earlier in the show about Reye's syndrome and aspirin. And I think I'd really like to hear more about that because my children are of an age now where they're getting fevers from school and so forth. It's really
Speaker 0: hope you've got very little time where we're gonna start another fight but we're gonna do it. We'll do that in just a moment. Recently there's been oh I should say that that's your we should give them the pop on that. That's the dissatisfied parents together. DPT, not surprisingly, that's Box 563.
This is your effort to encourage those who feel that they might have sustained family crisis because of vaccination to communicate with each other. 1377 K Street Northwest Washington DC. The zip is 20005. Obviously there, you know, there's a lot, you get a lot more done if you've got a crowd out in front of city hall.
Speaker 8: Yeah, anyone can write to me also. I'd be happy to, to, to hear from them, especially if had you've adverse reactions.
Speaker 2: Well, a matter of fact, the next time they come to you and ask for a contribution to the American Heart Association or the American Cancer Society, we should tell them that we're going to give our contributions to your organization instead.
Speaker 0: Oh, they're going to love you for that. Me give us your briefest speech regarding Reye's syndrome and its possible link with the aspirin ingestion during fever in childhood.
Speaker 2: Well, American the Academy of Pediatrics today is trying to get out from under. They're trying to say that there's no link between aspirin and Reye syndrome because they're so scared of lawsuits that might come up. As far as I'm concerned, I advise you and every other parent to pay attention to the media today because their reports on Reye's syndrome are more accurate than those of the medical journalists.
Speaker 0: Okay, but what do
Speaker 5: you That's do with a cheap shot. The members of the academy have spent hundreds of hours trying to look at the information relating to Reye's syndrome and whether or not aspirin may play a causal role. The answers aren't completely in yet. And what pediatricians have been advised to do is to tell their parents to be prudent about the use of aspirin. Most of the aspirin that we use for children isn't really necessary.
The answers aren't in. We're doing the best we can to get a clearer picture. In the meantime,
Speaker 0: prudent. Here's the problem though, Doctor. Cooper. It is not absolutely clear that you are doing the best you can to find out whether there's a link. That, that we really don't, we really are terribly disorganized in every, in every sense in this country.
We've got a fragmented country. So so it's kind of hard to be indignant about your discipline. But I don't think you're any different. The problem with you is that when you're not together, we hurt more because of the potential damage of not sure CDC in Atlanta may or may not be talking to people. How many statistics are are being gathered?
How many blind studies are being how much information is Not coming to this
Speaker 7: enough, Bill. Not enough. There was enough evidence on
Speaker 2: Lyme syndrome. Once more, we've
Speaker 0: got another doctor coming forward to saying we're doing our best. Be prudent. Hey. We need
Speaker 6: to do more as well,
Speaker 5: this public has to ask for more. And this public has to tell its legislators they can't
Speaker 6: cut. And we
Speaker 0: need more doctors who are not quite as defensive, who are open to the improvements that have to be made.
Speaker 5: Of course we do.
Speaker 0: Doctor. Moore.
Speaker 7: The evidence that was presented to Secretary Schweiker as the relationship between aspirin or eye syndrome convinced him that there should be a label on aspirin. The pharmaceutical company got together and lobbied and did away with that notification. So as of now, secretary Schweiker has backed away from that position that he took after hearing the evidence.
Speaker 0: Is the caller there?
Speaker 9: Yes.
Speaker 0: Not much time.
Speaker 9: Yes. I would like to say first of all that I am terrified at the fact that learning that after the third shot the one woman's boy got the symptoms of having neurological damage. Yeah. I felt that with my eight and a half month old daughter that once she got the first shot and she was fine, that I was safe, that she wasn't gonna have any problem. Mhmm.
I'm surprised to hear that this is going this could happen next time she gets a shot. Does do the chances get less as the child gets older or what? Am I do I
Speaker 6: have to
Speaker 9: go through the sphere all the time?
Speaker 0: You're talking about Emily Yankovich. Yeah.
Speaker 3: Right. With this our daughter, it happened after the second shot. But it can happen after any any immunization. Would there's even evidence that problems can show up later in life, but they're not proven statistics. And so we, there's nothing that we can say for sure, but you have to be aware of that.
And also if your children have any, if there's any history of central nervous system disorders in the family, any neurological problems in the family, or any seizures in the family, a child should never get protected.
Speaker 6: Thank you. I
Speaker 3: just want to know instead of aspirin, should we give our children Tylenol? Will that prevent, is there that big of a difference?
Speaker 0: Bob, I'm afraid I don't have the time for you to answer that And we'll be back in just a moment.
@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊
@MidwesternDoc Unmistakable cases of vaccine brain injury were rebranded into a vague, amorphous spectrum. Suddenly, the trauma parents had witnessed became too abstract and “complicated” to debate. Another PR victory achieved.
@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊
The rise in “mild autism” is the other side of the same coin. Less severe vaccine injuries manifest as quirks or traits, while the severe cases—what’s now called “profound autism”—are buried under the same label. The vast and often shifting spectrum with no concrete definitions hides the real pattern. And it is very likely by design.
@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊
@MidwesternDoc If you’ve sensed autism diagnoses just don’t add up, this report from @MidwesternDoc explains why. midwesterndoctor.com/p/erasing-ence…
@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊
@MidwesternDoc The 1986 Vaccine Injury Act was supposed to protect families. Instead, it removed liability from manufacturers and left “safety enforcement” up to HHS discretion. Predictably, the rules were gutted. Injuries skyrocketed. Accountability disappeared. And now here we are.
@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊
@MidwesternDoc One provision required compensation for encephalopathy—brain damage caused by vaccines. But if these vaccine injured children were suddenly classified as autistic, and vaccines “don’t cause autism,” there’s no compensation. Word games with real consequences.
@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊
Gavin DeBecker’s new book Forbidden Facts shows this isn’t new. The same PR machine that buried vaccine injury also buried: • Agent Orange toxicity • Gulf War Syndrome • SIDS links to vaccines • Breast implant illness And when I say the same, in some cases I mean the exact same people were involved in the cover-up of Agent Orange toxicity and vaccine injury. The same patterns. The same playbook. The same people. All recycled endlessly.
@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊
Right now and for the next few days, Forbidden Facts is free to download on Amazon. https://www.amazon.com/Forbidden-Facts-Government-Suppression-Childhood-ebook/dp/B0FJ2PQ7XJ/ I highly recommend you get this book, educate yourself on the history of just how much we’ve been lied to, and you raise your voice. We’re in the midst of a massive awakening and we can all contribute. Let’s unwind the decades of vaccine propaganda and stop the harm once and for all.
Forbidden Facts: Government Deceit & Suppression About Brain Damage from Childhood Vaccines
Buy Forbidden Facts: Government Deceit & Suppression About Brain Damage from Childhood Vaccines: Read Kindle Store Reviews - Amazon.com
amazon.com
@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊
We’ve figured it out and we’re not falling for it again. They craft reports that imply safety, but never outright state it. The media and “experts” misquote these reports as definitive proof. And the cycle goes on and on. It’s a deception loop. It’s not science. It’s simple successful public relations. The truth is clear. Vaccines are causing incredible damage.
@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊
@MidwesternDoc Polls now show 56% of American voters believe COVID vaccines caused mass deaths. Distrust is growing. The public knows what PR can’t erase: too many were harmed to deny it anymore. This is why hearings, books, and whistleblowers are gaining traction fast.
@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊
@MidwesternDoc Want to see how PR firms rigged the autism debate? Read @MidwesternDoc’s full breakdown: midwesterndoctor.com/p/erasing-ence…
@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊
Ron Johnson’s Senate hearing on September 9th exposed it all. We must not let this information slide into oblivion as the news cycle pushes forward. • Vaccinated children have 3–6X higher rates of chronic illness • Data has routinely been buried to avoid backlash • Pharma-backed witnesses crumble and repeat PR talking points under questioning The hearing went viral for a reason.
Video Transcript AI Summary
02/2013, the Institute of Medicine, commissioned by HHS, reviewed the CDC's childhood vaccine schedule and concluded, "the studies designed to examine the long term effects of the cumulative number of vaccines or other aspects of the immunization schedule have not been conducted." It also stated, "there is no evidence that the schedule is not safe," and noted, "The IRM report did say it is, quote, possible to make the comparison, meaning through vaccinated, unvaccinated children, through analyses of patient information contained in large databases such as the vaccine safety data link, end quote." Has it been done? I don't know. Has it been published? No. In 2017, ICAN sought this study; Del Bigtree met Dr. Marcus Zervos, who agreed to conduct it at Henry Ford. The study found vaccinated children had higher rates of asthma, atopic disease, autoimmune disease, and neurodevelopmental disorders; ADHD occurred in the vaccinated but not unvaccinated; about 16,000 vs 2,000. After ten years, 57% vs 17% had at least one chronic health issue. It was not published because its findings did not fit the belief and policy that vaccines are safe; "we can protect children from infectious disease, and we can protect children from vaccine harms."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Leading up to, 02/2013, the Institute of Medicine was commissioned by the United States Department of Health and Human Services to review the entire body of existing scientific literature to assess the safety of the CDC's childhood schedule as a whole. HHS paid the IOM to do that. After the IOM engaged in that task with a panel of multidisciplinary scientists, it concluded, quote, the studies designed to examine the long term effects of the cumulative number of vaccines or other aspects of the immunization schedule have not been conducted, have not been conducted, end quote. That's the Institute of Medicine's finding after reviewing the entire body of scientific literature. Meaning, the IOM could not find studies comparing as you would do to study the safety of a product, an exposed group, meaning kids that got vaccines, the childhood schedule with unvaccinated children, kids who got no vaccines, which is what you would need to assess the safety of the schedule.
Lacking evidence to support safety, the best the IOM can conclude was, quote, there is no evidence that the schedule is not safe, end quote. This, of course, also means the IOM cannot find evidence to conclude that the schedule is safe. The IRM report did say it is, quote, possible to make the comparison, meaning through vaccinated, unvaccinated children, through analyses of patient information contained in large databases such as the vaccine safety data link, end quote, which used to be housed at the CDC. But to date, the government has still not conducted this comparison. By the way, the CDC conducted published a white paper in 2015 on how to do that study.
Has it been done? I don't know. Has it been published? No. In 02/2017, one of our clients, senator Johnson said earlier, the Informed Consent Action Network, wanted to see this exact study of comparing vaccinated versus unvaccinated children.
As the, trailer you just watched noted, Del Bigtree, ICANT CEO, had met doctor Marcus Servis at one point, who was the head of infectious disease at Henry Ford Medical Center. And he agreed to meet and to potentially do the study. He is a conducts clinical trials for vaccines, including for the Moderna COVID nineteen vaccine. He's a validly pro vaccine. And when we met him, we argued that this was an opportunity to shut the anti vaxxers up about their claim that unvaccinated children are healthier.
To our surprise, doctor Zervis said he would conduct the study. He recruited a chief epidemiologist and two statisticians within Henry Ford to do so. These were mainstream scientists who no doubt held orthodox views regarding vaccines. In early twenty twenty, I received a copy of the study. It showed the results of the analysis comparing children enrolled in Henry Ford from 2000 to 2016 from birth onward who had no vaccines compared to those who had one or more vaccines.
This study was based on actual medical records. Meaning, finally, a large vaccinated versus unvaccinated study using health data from a major United States health institution, something, as the IOM pointed out, never existed before. The study began by explaining it set out to reduce vaccine hesitancy by assuring parents the CDC vaccine schedule is safe instead. What these researchers found was that vaccinated children had four point two nine times the rate of asthma, three point zero three times the rate of atopic disease, five point nine six times the rate of autoimmune disease, and five point five three times the rate of neurodevelopmental disorders, which included three point two eight times the rate of developmental delay, and four point four seven times the rate of speech disorder. All of these findings were statistically significant.
There was also other conditions for which there were numerous cases in the vaccinated group, but zero the unvaccinated group. Hence, a rate cannot be calculated, including brain dysfunction, ADHD, learning disabilities, intellectual disabilities, and ticks. For example, there were two hundred sixty cases of ADHD in the vaccinated group, and there were none in the unvaccinated group. In this study, there were around sixteen thousand kids in the vaccinated group, by the way, and around two thousand in the unvaccinated group. So the rate, of course, between those is important, and that's what the study compared.
These findings were troubling, including because these chronic health issues can be caused by immune system dysregulation, and vaccines can cause immune system dysregulation. Citations for this are in my written submission. Overall, the study found that after ten years, seventeen percent of the unvaccinated children had a chronic health issue, while fifty seven percent of the vaccinated children had at least one chronic health issue, often multiple. That's seventeen versus fifty seven percent. The only real problem with this study and why it didn't get submitted for publication is that its findings did not fit the belief and the policy that vaccines are safe.
Had it found vaccinated children were healthier, it no doubt would have been published immediately. But because it found the opposite, it was shoved in a draw. We have repeatedly urged doctor Zervos and La Mirada to submit the study for publication. They have affirmed the study was well designed and conducted, but doctor Zervos has said he doesn't wanna lose his job. And doctor Lemoretta has said she does not wanna make doctors uncomfortable.
This is a real world example of how the science around vaccines gets corrupted. How only studies that confirm the beliefs and policies that vaccines are safe get published. Everything else gets shoved in a draw. This selection bias is dangerous and results in corrupting all the science concerning vaccine safety. We can protect children from infectious disease, and we can protect children from vaccine harms.
We should and we must do both.
@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊
Meanwhile, trust in medicine has collapsed, and I don’t see any signs that it’s going to improve anytime soon. • Trust in the CDC dropped from 80% in 2020 (pre-COVID) to 60% in 2024 • Trust in the FDA dropped from 65% to 53% from 223-2025 and is now hovering just over 30% • Only 31% now view healthcare positively • Pharma approval is at 20% Decades of propaganda are unraveling before our eyes. The truth is breaking through. We’re standing at a turning point.
Video Transcript AI Summary
"Raise your hand if you or someone you know personally had a serious adverse event to this vaccine. Raise your hand. Yep. Almost every single hand in this room was raised. 'For the con artists out of the media, it's either what's going on here?' 'Now let's go a step further. ... believe the vaccine contributed to the death of somebody that you know.' Raise your hand. '100%. Yep. Look around the room. Two people.' 'We are we're not even allowed to talk about this.' 'You just saw thousands of hands get raised, and I was very careful with how I asked the question.' 'I mean, it's beyond anything we've ever lived through in our life, and we're not even allowed to talk about it.' 'Thought police' ... 'When we're not allowed to talk about something... They got you then.' Wow. That was great video."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Raise your hand if you or someone you know personally had a serious adverse event to this vaccine. Raise your hand. Yep. Almost every single hand in this room was raised. For the con artists out of the media, it's either what's going on here?
Maybe there's something that is so beyond what's not being reported. That when you have thousands of hands that go up in a room like this, I don't know about you, but I know personal stories of some very tragic reactions. Now let's go a step further. Let's say, raise your hand. If you beyond any reason of, like, beyond reasonable doubt, you believe the vaccine contributed to the death of somebody that you know.
Raise your hand. 100%. Yep. Look around the room. Two people.
We are we're not even allowed to talk about this. Are you kidding me? You you are governor, what's going on here? You just saw thousands of hands get raised, and I was very careful with how I asked the question. Right?
And let's pretend half of the people here are wrong. Is this a scandal? No. I mean, it's beyond anything we've ever lived through in our life, and we're not even allowed to talk about it.
Speaker 1: Right. And and that's the scary thing is, you know, the the well, it really is the thought police that are trying to crack down. When we're not allowed to talk about something, you know what that leads to? Those who don't want us to talk about something. Ultimately, they don't want us to think about something, and it it is a thought police type issue.
They because when you are afraid to speak a truth, well, they got you then.
Speaker 0: Wow. That was great video.
@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊
Despite the attacks and repeated attempts to discredit him, RFK Jr. is continuing the fight. New state reforms are popping up as we speak, more hearings are being planned, and new books are all converging. The tide is truly shifting. And for the first time in decades, we have a real chance to reclaim medicine and take back control of our health and our future.
@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊
@MidwesternDoc There is no question... The vaccines don’t cause autism narrative was built by PR, not by science. And now it’s collapsing under the weight of truth. The question is: will enough of us speak up before they try to bury it again? I believe we will.
@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊
@MidwesternDoc If this thread opened your eyes, the book will blow them wide open. Forbidden Facts uncovers decades of buried truths, and right now it’s completely FREE to grab on Amazon. Pick up your free copy: 👇 https://www.amazon.com/Forbidden-Facts-Government-Suppression-Childhood-ebook/dp/B0FJ2PQ7XJ/
Forbidden Facts: Government Deceit & Suppression About Brain Damage from Childhood Vaccines
Buy Forbidden Facts: Government Deceit & Suppression About Brain Damage from Childhood Vaccines: Read Kindle Store Reviews - Amazon.com
amazon.com
@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊
@MidwesternDoc Thanks for reading! This information was based on a report originally published by @MidwesternDoc. Key details were streamlined and editorialized for clarity and impact. Read the original report here. https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/erasing-encephalitis-why-vaccine
Erasing Encephalitis: Why Vaccine Brain Injuries Became Autism
For decades, cunning public relations tactics have buried a flood of vaccine brain injuries. Seeing through these deceptive strategies equips you to uncover the lies shaping every corner of our lives.
midwesterndoctor.com
@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊
@MidwesternDoc For a deeper dive into what modern medicine has overlooked—or intentionally buried—check out these other eye-opening reports by @MidwesternDoc: The FDA’s 50-Year War on the Safest Painkiller Ever Discovered https://www.vigilantfox.com/p/the-fdas-50-year-war-on-the-safest
The FDA’s 50-Year War on the Safest Painkiller Ever Discovered
If you thought what they did to ivermectin was bad, wait till you hear what they did to this drug.
vigilantfox.com
@VigilantFox - Vigilant Fox 🦊
@MidwesternDoc The Decades of Evidence SSRI Antidepressants Cause Mass Shootings https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-evidence-ssri-antidepressants
The Decades of Evidence SSRI Antidepressants Cause Mass Shootings
How Dangerous Must a Drug Be Before it is Pulled from the Market?
midwesterndoctor.com
@newstart_2024 - Camus
Dr. Sabine Hazan: "So I'm ready to fight. This is our freedom we're talking about. This is our freedom of choice. There is a corruption in medicine. There is an interference with science and research that is going to affect all of us." https://t.co/3XRCof07Hp
Video Transcript AI Summary
I usually say I'd rather be a quack than a sheep. So you know what? Call me whatever you want to call me. I'm still gonna be roaring at the end of the day. So, and this is a fight.
This is a fight for humanity. You know, someone said to me yesterday, you're such a fighter. And I said, you better believe I was born for this. So, you know, that's why I have the lioness hair. So I'm ready to fight.
This is our freedom we're talking about. This is our freedom of choice. There is a corruption in medicine. There is an interference with science and research that is going to affect all of us.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I usually say I'd rather be a quack than a sheep. So you know what? Call me whatever you want to call me. I'm still gonna be roaring at the end of the day. So, and this is a fight.
This is a fight for humanity. You know, someone said to me yesterday, you're such a fighter. And I said, you better believe I was born for this. So, you know, that's why I have the lioness hair. So I'm ready to fight.
This is our freedom we're talking about. This is our freedom of choice. There is a corruption in medicine. There is an interference with science and research that is going to affect all of us.