reSee.it - Related Post Feed

TheGeneral_0
Posted - November 21, 2023 at 8:31 PM
Saved - November 22, 2023 at 4:47 PM

@TheGeneral_0 - General™️👀🇺🇸🦅

Nancy Pelosi is corrupt and benefitted from her own insider knowledge.https://t.co/mirFmRvYW9

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 asks Speaker 1 about accepting a large IPO deal from Visa in 2008 while legislation affecting credit card companies was being discussed. Speaker 1 questions the point of the question and denies any conflict of interest. Speaker 0 insists on whether it was appropriate for a speaker to accept such a deal, but Speaker 1 dismisses it as a false premise. Speaker 0 asks for clarification, and Speaker 1 confirms that they would act upon an investment.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I wanted to ask you why you and your husband, back in March of 2008, accepted and participated in a very large IPO deal from Visa. At a time, there was major legislation affecting the credit card companies making its way through the, through the house. And would you consider that to be a conflict of interest? Speaker 1: The I I don't know what your point is of your question. Is there some point that you want to make with that? Speaker 0: Well, I I guess what I'm asking is do you think it's alright for, a speaker, to accept a very preferential and favorable stock deal? Well, we did. And if you participate in the IPO Speaker 1: Well, I have never met that. Speaker 0: You were speaker of the house. You don't think it was a conflict of interest or had the appearance Speaker 1: of a conflict of interest? Which only has appearance if you decide that you're going to Have, elaborate on a false premise, but it it it's not true, and that's that. Speaker 0: I don't understand what part's not true. Speaker 1: Yes, sir. That that I would act upon an investment. Yes.
WallStreetSilv
Posted - December 22, 2023 at 10:19 PM
Saved - December 23, 2023 at 12:26 AM

@WallStreetSilv - Wall Street Silver

Where Nancy Pelosi bought $KRTX. Nothing to see here ... 🔥🔥🔥 Members of Congress can legally trade stocks based on insider information. This is why Nancy keeps running for re-election. https://t.co/P9APYXl4dC

WallStreetApes
Posted - February 26, 2024 at 2:29 PM
Saved - February 26, 2024 at 3:14 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Congressional lawmakers, like Senator Markwayne Mullin, have seen their net worth skyrocket through stock market investments. Mullin's wealth quadrupled between 2018 and 2022, coinciding with his purchase of shares in Badger Meter Incorporated, a water meter company. Shortly after, Tulsa, Oklahoma announced a $94 million project to replace water meters, using the same product made by Badger Meter. This pattern of insider trading and nationwide water meter replacements suggests a larger issue within Congress.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

US Congress Is Insider Trading Making Millions Oklahoma Senator Markwayne Mullin’s Net Worth QUADRUPLED Between 2018-2022 From $12m -> $63m He Bought Shares Of A Water Meter Company Just 2 Weeks Before Tulsa, Oklahoma Announced Replacing All Water Meters Costing $94 Million How Did He Know?! But That’s Not All, Other Congress Members Made The Trade & The Water Meter Replacements Are Being Done Nationwide Congress is a criminal enterprise never before seen 💰 “How is it possible that even though the congressional salary is a $174,000 a year, all these lawmakers are worth millions of dollars? That's because they often make much more than that in the stock market. I'll give you a perfect example, Senator Markwayne Mullin from Oklahoma. His net worth almost quadrupled between 2018 and 2022. January 4th, early this year, he bought shares of a company called Badger Meter Incorporated, ticker BMI. Now, Badger Meter, as their name suggests, makes water meters. The things that calculate how much water you use. So stick with me. Remember earlier when I said senator Mullen is from Oklahoma? The reason that's important is because just 2 weeks after Mullin bought shares with the water meter company, I came across an announcement by the city of Tulsa, Oklahoma saying that it has begun the installation of 145,000 automated water meters across the city at a cost of $94,000,000. The exact same product which was made by Badger Meter, the company he bought stock in just 2 weeks earlier. And it's not just Tulsa doing this, this is going on across the country. That's because of the new federal mandate by the EPA for every US city to upgrade their inventory of lead service lines by October 24, 2024 later this year. It's reasonable to assume that when Tulsa and all these other US cities upgrade millions of water meters to meet these new guidelines, a company like Badger Meter would stand to benefit, and in turn, those shares that he bought. I wish I could say that this was an isolated incident, but I see stuff like this happen all the time.” QuiverQuant

Video Transcript AI Summary
Many lawmakers have significantly increased their wealth through stock market investments, like Senator Mark Wayne Mullen. He bought shares in a water meter company shortly before the city of Tulsa announced a $94 million project using the same product. This pattern is happening nationwide due to a federal mandate for cities to upgrade water meters. These investments often outperform the S&P 500. For more information, visit quiverquant.com. Translation: Lawmakers are making money by investing in companies like water meter manufacturers, benefiting from city projects and federal mandates. Visit quiverquant.com for more details.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: How is it possible that even though the congressional salary is a $174,000 a year, all these lawmakers are worth 1,000,000 of dollars? That's because they often make much more than that in the stock market. I'll give you a perfect example, senator Mark Wayne Mullen from Oklahoma. His net worth almost quadrupled between 2018 and 2022. January 4th, early this year, he bought shares of a company called Badger Meter Incorporated, ticker BMI. Now, Badger Meter, as their name suggests, makes water meters. The things that calculate how much water you use. So stick with me. Remember earlier when I said senator Mullen is from Oklahoma? The reason that's important is because just 2 weeks after Mullen bought shares with a water meter company, I came across an announcement by the city of Tulsa, Oklahoma saying that it has begun the installation of 145,000 automated water meters across the city at a cost of $94,000,000. The exact same product which was made by Badger Meter, the company he bought stock in just 2 weeks earlier. And it's not just Tulsa doing this, this is going on across the country. That's because of a new federal mandate by the EPA for every US city to upgrade their inventory of lead service lines by October 24, 2024 later this year. It's reasonable to assume that when Tulsa and all these other US cities upgrade millions of water meters to meet these new guidelines, a company like Badger Meter would stand to benefit and in turn those shares that he bought. I wish I could say that this was an isolated incident, but I see stuff like this happen all the time. And it's the reason when you compare the performance of lawmaker trades with the S and P 500, the graph looks like this. If you wanna check it out, just go to quiverquant.com where I track it all.
Charles07788205
Posted - June 4, 2024 at 11:19 AM
Saved - June 4, 2024 at 1:42 PM

@Charles07788205 - Big Bend 1911

@WallStreetApes A look at those members making the most off of trading stocks. https://www.fool.com/research/congressional-stock-trading-who-trades-and-makes-the-most/ Unfortunately, insider trading is not illegal from congress, they exempted themselves.

Congressional Stock Trading: Who Trades and Makes the Most | The Motley Fool Members of Congress make between 10,000 and 20,000 stock trades per year - and tend to beat the market. fool.com
WallStreetApes
Posted - August 28, 2024 at 10:55 PM
Saved - August 29, 2024 at 1:30 AM

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

The US Government has started an investigation into BlackRock after BlackRock was exposed for investing $429,000,000 into the Chinese military Democrat Congressman Ro Khanna sold $130k of BlackRock stock just 4 months before the investigation How did he know? Insider trading. https://t.co/kZvOG7Cg9h

Video Transcript AI Summary
BlackRock is under investigation for investing $429 million into the Chinese military. The US government has initiated a full-scale investigation, but allegedly knew about BlackRock's business dealings prior to informing the public. Nine out of ten congresspeople trading BlackRock stock were reportedly selling it. Democratic Congressman Ro Khanna allegedly sold $130,000 worth of this stock months before the investigation.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Breaking news. BlackRock has just been exposed for investing $429,000,000 into the Chinese military. The US government has initiated a full scale investigation. But probably, they knew about BlackRock's business dealings before letting the public know about its investment in the last several months. 9 out of 10 congresspeople that traded BlackRock stock were selling it. Democratic congressman Ro Khanna sold a 130 k worth of this stock for months before the investigation.
WallStreetApes
Posted - November 24, 2024 at 8:13 PM
Saved - November 26, 2024 at 6:14 PM

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

Over 40 Congress Representatives caught insider trading and beating the market by up to 280%. Multiple Congress Reps taking over 6 years before reporting their transactions. No punishments “It's criminal conduct that you and I would be in prison for 10-20 years if we did this.” https://t.co/CecYIbV8Wu

Video Transcript AI Summary
A report reveals that at least 40 members of Congress violated conflict of interest laws in the past year, highlighting a troubling trend where violations outnumber new legislation. Lawmakers prioritize stock trading over legislative duties, with some making significant profits from insider knowledge. For instance, Rick Allen from Georgia reported $8.5 million in stock transactions after 6.5 years, using excuses like clerical errors. Both Democrats and Republicans are implicated, with minimal penalties for violations, often just $200. This systemic issue allows politicians to amass wealth while ordinary citizens would face severe consequences for similar actions. The discussion also touches on campaign contributions from Wall Street, exemplified by Nikki Haley's financial rise linked to corporate relationships. The segment emphasizes the lack of accountability in Congress and the influence of corporate money in politics.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: A new report has found that at least 40 members of congress have violated conflict of interest laws in the past 12 months. And because nobody ever gets punished, we could see that that number continues to grow larger every year. Wow. This is you know, go to Congress not because you're gonna do anything, not because you're gonna help consumers, not because you're gonna pass any law that's good for climate, not because you're gonna pass any laws good for health care. Go there because it's a big moneymaker. It's a huge moneymaker, isn't it? Speaker 1: It it is. What's funny about this, let me throw some numbers out here. Forty members, at least, that we know of, violated the stock act. 40. Speaker 0: Do you Speaker 1: know how many pieces of legislation this congress passed in that same amount of time? 20. Wow. So we had twice as many violations of a federal law than we had pieces of new legislation passed the chamber. Speaker 0: That's it. Speaker 1: That's how insane this is. They're more concerned about trading their stocks and making their money than they are Speaker 0: about actually legislating. The numbers are staggering. Speaker 1: They were. I mean, I Speaker 0: we did one story where we saw that there's a 286 percent. You take the S and P. Okay? And this legislator made 260, 280 percent higher than the S and P. Nancy Pelosi made almost 70% higher than the S and P. All of these folks are cashing in on what they know. They go to committee meetings, they learn that there's going to be a new war. Well, let's go buy defense stock. Matter of fact, this this one this one part of this that caught my caught my eye, Rick Allen Rick Allen from Georgia, $8,500,000 in stock transactions. It took him 6.5 years before he reported it. And they've given these lame excuse like, well, I just, it was a mistake. I just, it was an error. It was a clerical error, administrative error. These are actual excuses. Or my financial advisor will he's to blame. And they know it's a lie. I mean, it's democrat it's more democrat interesting on this story, it's more democrats doing this than republicans. Maybe they have more money. I don't know why. But this is not a Democrat Republican story. This is Speaker 1: This is one of those where it is it is the left. It is the right. It is everybody almost that we have in Congress that is doing this. And they do it because as we've talked about before, the penalty when they get caught if they get caught using their insider knowledge to make $20,000,000 on a stock trade, the penalty is $200 And in most instances, the ethics committee actually waives the fees. Yeah. So there's no fee. But, okay, if you have to pay $200 to make a 1,000,000, hell, yeah. I'll take that transaction all day long Yeah. Because that's a small user fee at that point. Speaker 0: I love this quote. It's by Brian Baird. He's a Democrat in Washington, Washington state. He says, I'm so tired of these excuses. The dog ate my homework is what all of my colleagues are saying. The dog ate my homework. I'm not responsible for this. Their it's criminal conduct that you and I would be in prison for for 10 to 20 years if we did this. If we did one of them. Yeah. Much less 100 and 100 year after year, but they don't go to prison for it. They get rewarded. They make more money. They're able to come into congress poppers and leave multimillionaires. Great example, Nikki Haley. We talk about all the time. Speaker 1: Yeah. She actually, it was reported, not that long ago. Nikki Haley just got a huge infusion of campaign cash from Wall Street, to save her even though, obviously, she got no shot at winning. But Wall Street says, we like you. Here's more cash. Speaker 0: Well, why do they say that? Because she's nothing but a corporate whore. I mean, she literally is. I mean, look at her relationship with bore with Boeing. Yeah. I mean, is she better than Trump? Probably. You know what I mean? That's not a tough standard. But, you know, she comes into congress. She's a pauper, has no money. Within, what, 5 years, she's living in a $5,000,000 mansion. Where'd the money come from? It came from her relationship with corporate America. That's why you have Wall Street pumping so much money into her campaign. Yeah. Farron, thanks for joining me. Okay? Thank you. That's all for this week, but all these segments are going to be posted right here on this channel in the coming week. So make sure you subscribe. I'm Mike Papantonio, and this has been America's Lawyer, where we tell you the stories every week that corporate media won't tell you because their advertisers don't allow them. If they tell the story, the advertisers are gonna pull the money, or their political connections are so strong, either Democrat or Republican, that they're afraid to talk about their political party. As you've seen on this show for years, we're not afraid to talk about either political party. We talk we talk about balls and strikes. Hopefully, we'll see you next time.
RickyDoggin
Posted - November 30, 2024 at 8:53 PM
Saved - December 2, 2024 at 2:34 PM

@RickyDoggin - A Man Of Memes

In 2021, Nancy Pelosi was asked if Congress should be banned from trading stocks. Her Response: "No… This is a free market." While serving 37 years in Congress with an annual salary of $223,500, she increased her net worth to an estimated $263,000,000. https://t.co/NZneNs1CGi

Video Transcript AI Summary
Should Congress members and their spouses be prohibited from trading individual stocks while in office? I'm not sure about that. We have a duty to report stock trades, but I'm not familiar with the five-month review process. If individuals aren't reporting, they should be held accountable. However, we live in a free market economy, and people should have the right to participate in it.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Should members of Congress and their spouses be banned from trading individual stocks while they're in Congress? No, I don't know to the second one. Any we have a responsibility to report in the stock on the stock, but I don't I'm not familiar with that 5 month review. But if people aren't reporting, they should be. Why don't they take it? Because this is a free market and people we have a free market economy. They should be able to participate in that.
WallStreetApes
Posted - February 1, 2025 at 9:24 PM
Saved - February 2, 2025 at 2:29 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
DOGE has gained access to the US Treasury System, which I believe will lead to significant revelations. I’m concerned about former Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen, who made over $7 million in speaking fees and seemed to support using taxpayer funds to boost China's economy. Who are these people really working for?

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

DOGE has just gained access to the US Treasury System, this is going to be insane The previous Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen was bribed by Wall Street, making over $7 MILLION in “speaking fees” She also openly worked to use US Taxpayer funds to build China’s Economy Janet Yellen encourages using Federal Funds for “The building of the Chinese Economy” Who have these people been working for? I think that’s very clear DOGE is going to find some INSANE corruption

Video Transcript AI Summary
Is there a national purpose in encouraging Americans to invest in Chinese equities? I'm not aware of one. Generally, our view is that both inward and outward investments are economically beneficial. However, many members of Congress do not believe that building the Chinese economy is a good use of federal funds.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Why do we wanna is there a national purpose in encouraging Americans to invest in Chinese equities that you're aware of? Because I'm not. Speaker 1: Well, I mean, in general, I think our view has been that both inward and outward investment are economically beneficial. It there's certainly Speaker 0: I wanna move on to another issue, but Speaker 1: it can be case. Speaker 0: The building of the Chinese economy is not thought by most members of congress to be a good use of of federal funds.
RepRaskin
Posted - February 4, 2025 at 5:38 PM
Saved - February 6, 2025 at 6:34 AM

@RepRaskin - Rep. Jamie Raskin

This is a defamatory lie easily debunked by public financial reports. As a DOGE Special Government Employee, your financial reports should be public too. As a government contractor who rakes in billions from taxpayers, do you have a conflict of interest waiver? Let’s see it.

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

What Raskin actually means is that he wants his kickbacks and bribes to continue. US lobbying/law firms who launder foreign donations (which are actually US taxpayer foreign aid coming full circle!) need to be investigated and shut down.

Sassafrass_84
Posted - February 7, 2025 at 1:52 AM
Saved - February 7, 2025 at 12:52 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m keeping an eye on the Democrats who are vocal about Musk and DOGE. These career politicians, earning between $174K and $400K, have net worths in the tens of millions, which raises questions about their accountability. I’ve listed their estimated wealth, and it’s clear they’re upset because Musk and DOGE are shining a light on waste and corruption. If they’re truly transparent, they shouldn’t be worried. Their reactions suggest they have a lot to explain.

@Sassafrass_84 - Sassafrass84

Keep an eye on them. 👇 These are the Democrats screaming the loudest about Musk and DOGE. I don’t want to hear another peep from these career politicians throwing tantrums over accountability. These are the same people who’ve been living large off taxpayer dollars while pretending to fight for "the little guy." Their salaries range from $174K to $400K, yet somehow their net worths are in the tens of millions. How does that math work? Spoiler: it doesn’t. Audit them all, DOGE. Let’s see how deep the swamp really goes: • Ilhan Omar: $83M • Chuck Schumer: $75M • Elizabeth Warren: $73M • Adam Schiff: $60M • Jamie Raskin: $20M • Hakeem Jeffries: $17M • Cory Booker: $14M • Jasmine Crockett: $10M These are the people crying foul because Musk and DOGE are exposing waste, fraud, and corruption. They’re not mad about accountability—they’re mad because the spotlight is finally on them. If you’re worth tens of millions on a public servant’s salary, you better believe we’re going to ask questions. And if you’ve got nothing to hide, you shouldn’t be worried. But judging by the meltdowns, it looks like they’ve got plenty to explain.

elonmusk
Posted - February 7, 2025 at 2:09 PM
Saved - February 7, 2025 at 10:26 PM

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

The Democrats really want their bribe money

@MarioNawfal - Mario Nawfal

🇺🇸DEMOCRATS PUSH BILL TO BLOCK ELON FROM TREASURY ACCESS—CALL IT AN 'ECONOMIC COUP' House Democrats, led by Rep. Sydney Kamlager-Dove, introduced legislation to block Elon from accessing Treasury records, claiming DOGE is attempting an "economic coup." Kamlager-Dove: "No one thought Trump would give Elon access to Social Security data, medical records, and payments. This is unacceptable." A federal judge has already blocked DOGE from obtaining certain Treasury payment records. Source: FOX 11

CollinRugg
Posted - February 11, 2025 at 9:28 PM
Saved - February 11, 2025 at 10:14 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I find it odd that some federal workers have high salaries yet manage to accumulate tens of millions in net worth. I'm curious about the source of their wealth, and I'm looking into it.

@CollinRugg - Collin Rugg

BREAKING: DOGE is looking into federal workers who have a high net worth despite having a low salary, according to Elon Musk. 🔥🔥 "We find it sort of rather odd that there are quite a few people in the bureaucracy who who have a salary of a few hundred thousand dollars, but somehow manage to accrue tens of millions of dollars in net worth." "We're just curious as to where it came from..."

Video Transcript AI Summary
We've uncovered some unusual financial discrepancies. Several bureaucrats with modest salaries have amassed tens of millions of dollars in net worth during their employment. One example involves a woman who walked away with approximately $30,000,000. This is particularly notable in USAID. We're investigating the source of this wealth. Perhaps they are skilled investors, but it seems more likely that this wealth accumulation is occurring at the expense of the organization. We're looking into it and trying to determine where this money originated.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And also, could you mention some of the things that your team has found, some of the crazy numbers including the woman that walked away with about 30,000,000, etcetera? Speaker 1: Well, we we we we do find it sort of rather odd that, you know, there there are quite a few people in in in the bureaucracy who who have a, ostensibly, a salary of a few hundred thousand dollars but somehow managed to accrue tens of millions dollars in net worth, while they are in that position, which is, you know, what what happened to USAID. We're just curious as to where it came from. Maybe they're very good at investing. They in which case, we should take their investment advice, perhaps. But, just there seems to be mysteriously they they get wealthy. We don't know why. Where does it come from? And, I think the reality is that they're getting wealthy at detached fair expense. That's that's the that's the honest truth of it. So, you know, we we're looking at, say, well, we we we just
elonmusk
Posted - February 27, 2025 at 3:26 PM
Saved - February 28, 2025 at 3:56 AM

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

Many such situations. Government funding to “non-governmental” organizations goes through various money-laundering shell companies until reaching guys like Raskin.

@MilaLovesJoe - Mila Joy

🚨 EXPOSED: J6 Committee Member Jamie Raskin's $160M USAID Connection! 🚨 You won't believe this - Representative Jamie Raskin, one of the key figures on the J6 Committee sho received a pardon from Biden, is linked to a MASSIVE $160 MILLION from USAID! 😱 Not only was he part of the squad trying to 'keep us in check' during the J6 hearings, but he's also the representative for Global Communities, a giant USAID contractor that raked in $160,000,000 in 2023! 🤑💸 Is this what they call "following the money"? Talk about a conflict of interest! #RaskinExposed #J6Committee #FollowTheMoney #CorruptionInCongress

elonmusk
Posted - February 27, 2025 at 3:26 PM
Saved - February 28, 2025 at 4:01 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Elon Musk highlighted issues with government funding to NGOs, suggesting it often involves money-laundering shell companies before reaching individuals like Raskin. In response, a user criticized Raskin for allegedly lying about the FBI's actions toward parents at school board meetings.

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

Many such situations. Government funding to “non-governmental” organizations goes through various money-laundering shell companies until reaching guys like Raskin.

@MilaLovesJoe - Mila Joy

🚨 EXPOSED: J6 Committee Member Jamie Raskin's $160M USAID Connection! 🚨 You won't believe this - Representative Jamie Raskin, one of the key figures on the J6 Committee sho received a pardon from Biden, is linked to a MASSIVE $160 MILLION from USAID! 😱 Not only was he part of the squad trying to 'keep us in check' during the J6 hearings, but he's also the representative for Global Communities, a giant USAID contractor that raked in $160,000,000 in 2023! 🤑💸 Is this what they call "following the money"? Talk about a conflict of interest! #RaskinExposed #J6Committee #FollowTheMoney #CorruptionInCongress

@WesternLensman - Western Lensman

@elonmusk Raskin does nothing but lie. Here he is two days ago insisting that the FBI didn’t go after parents at school board meetings. https://t.co/aPnOyWopRX

Video Transcript AI Summary
I've been hearing about the prosecution and vilification of parents, and as a father myself, I wanted to understand what was happening. After investigating, I reviewed Attorney General Merrick Garland's memo, which addresses a disturbing increase in harassment, intimidation, and threats of violence against school administrators, teachers, board members, and staff. It's important to note that the words "mother," "father," or even "parent" do not appear in this memo. The idea that there's some widespread prosecution of parents is completely unfounded and fabricated. I'll submit the memo for the record.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: When we talk about it, then I hear about the prosecution and vilification of parents, of mothers and fathers. And hey, I'm a father. My kids went to public school. That doesn't sound very good to me. So I try to get to the bottom of this because I've been hearing about it for five years now, and I ask myself, what are they talking about? So I get the memo, which was from Attorney General Merrick Garland, and it begins, I can't don't have time to read the whole thing, there's been a disturbing spike in harassment, intimidation, and threats of violence against school administrators, teachers, board members, and staff. The word mother or father don't appear. The word parent doesn't appear here. There's all of this propaganda about some prosecution of parents is based on absolutely nothing. This is just made up out of thin air. So I will submit this for the record. The memo though, all this goes back to Mr. Chairman. Thanks so much.
elonmusk
Posted - March 4, 2025 at 6:54 PM
Saved - March 4, 2025 at 11:20 PM

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

Stole a million dollars of taxpayer money? 🤔

@nicksortor - Nick Sortor

🚨 #BREAKING EXCLUSIVE: I asked Maxine Waters if the reason she’s so against DOGE is because she was caught funneling over $1 MILLION in regulated funds to her daughter But because her goon squad recognized me, they immediately surrounded her and shoved me into the side of her limo… again. I also attempted to ask her why she’s so against change the VAST majority of Americans voted for. Sounds like her attempts to block transparency is a “threat to our Democracy,” as the Democrats say.

Video Transcript AI Summary
I can't believe you funneled over $1,000,000 in campaign funds to your daughters! Is that why you're worried about Doge? Get your ass away from me! I wouldn't even touch you. I'll press charges! I'm not charging at you. But I feel like that's a pretty fair question, why are you so worried about Doge? You're pushing me! Pushing Doge has a very high approval rating amongst the American people. What an asshole. So what? You don't wanna, you don't like the will of the people?
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Maxine, you funneled over $1,000,000 in campaign funds to your daughters. Is that why you're worried about your nose? Your ass away, young man. Yeah. Yeah. I wouldn't wouldn't touch her. I'll press charges. I'm not charged on you. But but I'm just I feel like that's a pretty fair question. Why are you so worried about Doge? You're pushing me. You're pushing me. You're pushing me. Pushing Doge has a very high approval rating amongst the American people. What an asshole. So what? You don't wanna you don't like the will of the blast off.
WallStreetApes
Posted - March 6, 2025 at 12:05 PM
Saved - March 7, 2025 at 1:31 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The situation surrounding Democrat Rep. Josh Gottheimer is alarming. He received PAC donations from Microsoft just before purchasing their stock, which then soared, earning him millions. His background as a former Microsoft general manager raises concerns about potential insider connections. He has made 113 trades in Microsoft stock, often with significant returns. Additionally, he has engaged in $91 million of insider trading this year, lives in a lavish $10 million penthouse, and owns a private jet, yacht, and luxury cars. The implications of his actions are troubling.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

This corruption is INSANE 🚨 Democrat Rep Josh Gottheimer took PAC donations from Microsoft RIGHT BEFORE buying Microsoft Stock, after he did the stock SKYROCKETED making him millions It gets worse: He served as the general manager of advertising and strategy at Microsoft prior to becoming a member of Congress Guess what, he just invested $20 MILLION more into Microsoft Stock Here’s the Red Flags - He served as the general manager of advertising and strategy at Microsoft prior to becoming a member of Congress - If anybody knows the company's potential, it's him. This is already pretty damning evidence that he may still have some connections within Microsoft - After going through Josh Gottheimer stock trades, His most traded asset is Microsoft stock with 113 trades made - The majority of his trades on Microsoft actually ended up netting him solid returns, like when he purchased $2.5 million dollars worth of it on January 6th, 2023, and the stock immediately surged 63% the following year - 2 unusual corporate PAC donations before he took that trade from none other than Microsoft Corporation “So clearly Microsoft has a close connection to Josh Gottheimer, and I'm starting to think that they planted Josh in Congress just to help pass legislation in favor of the company. What do you think?” Democrat Rep Josh Gottheimer has also - Already insider traded $91 MILLION this year - He lives in a $10 million dollar New Jersey penthouse with 5 bedrooms and 9 bathrooms - He bought a $20 million dollar private jet he uses to fly to his Malibu vacation home - Owns a yacht - Owns a Lamborghini Avengador and Rolls Royce Phantom

Video Transcript AI Summary
As an active stock trader, I recently uncovered a massive $20 million investment in Microsoft by Representative Josh Gottenheimer. This is 27% of his net worth. While the stock is only up 1% since the purchase, his prior role as a Microsoft executive raises some questions. Reviewing Gottenheimer's trades since 2022, Microsoft is his most traded asset, with 13 trades. A notable trade was a $2.5 million purchase on January 6, 2023, which saw a 63% surge the following year. I also noticed corporate PAC donations from Microsoft before that trade. Given Microsoft's connection to Gottenheimer, and politicians making waves with huge trades, it's crucial to follow their moves because they give us clues that the regular market overlooks. I'll be watching Microsoft closely and tracking Gottenheimer's portfolio. To follow politician trades, check out boarsfinance.com.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: As an active stock trader, when I find something as rare as this, I have to make a video about it. I just came across one of the biggest stock trades made by a politician in terms of total dollars invested into a single stock. The politician I'm referring to is representative Josh Gottenheimer, who recently dropped a disclosure showing that he invested $20,000,000 in the Microsoft stock on December nineteenth of twenty twenty four. Now at the time of this recording, the stock has only gone up 1% since his purchase. But all of this makes me beg the question, why did Josh just dump 27% of his net worth aka $20,000,000 into an individual stock like Microsoft? Considering the fact that his net worth is only $73,000,000, I'd say that this was a pretty confident move on his part. The reason why he bought so much Microsoft still remains a mystery to me, but there is something that is throwing up some red flags here. Let me explain. He served as the general manager of advertising and strategy at Microsoft prior to becoming a member of congress, And if anybody knows the company's potential, it's him. This is already pretty damning evidence that he may still have some connections within Microsoft, so I decided to do some more digging and you won't believe what I found. I took a look at every trade that Josh Gottenheimer has made since 2022, and in total, he made a little over 1,500 stock trades. And, yep, you guessed it. His most traded asset is Microsoft stock with a 13 trades made. Now one thing that I noticed is that the majority of his trades on Microsoft actually ended up netting him solid returns like when he purchased 2 and a half million dollars worth of it on January sixth of twenty twenty three, and the stock immediately surged 63% the following year. I also noticed two unusual corporate pack donations before he took that trade from none other than Microsoft Corporation. So clearly, Microsoft has a close connection to Josh Gottenheimer, and I'm starting to think that they planted Josh in congress just to help pass legislation in favor of the company. What do you Anyway, that's not the point of this video. Politicians aren't typically known for making $20,000,000 waves in a single stock trade. So when they do this, you better bet they're putting their money where their mouth is. This is why I closely track the trades that politicians make because sometimes they give us clues that the regular market overlooks. That's how I've managed to stay a few steps ahead all of these years by following the money, especially the money that comes from the halls of congress. I'm definitely keeping Microsoft on my watch list, and I'll be looking into any new developments with Rep Gottenheimer's portfolio, so give my page a follow for updates on that. If you wanna track all the politician trades, pack deals, and big moves like this, check out boarsfinance.com. Because in today's market, the best intel often comes where you least expect it, Capitol Hill.
WallStreetApes
Posted - March 8, 2025 at 7:25 AM
Saved - March 8, 2025 at 8:31 AM

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

It’s SO INSANE this is allowed to continue - Nancy Pelosi just bought Shares and Calls of a company called Tempus - Just 17 days later the stock skyrocketed and her investment increased 213% - Nancy Pelosi’s $75k purchase turned into $235k Nancy Pelosi made $160,000 IN 17 DAYS https://t.co/TVJtwCvXbr

Video Transcript AI Summary
I can't believe more people aren't talking about this! Since I reported Nancy Pelosi's purchase of Tempest shares on MLK Day, the stock is up 17% in just seventeen days. But it's even crazier because she bought call options, giving her even more leverage. Her initial $75,000 investment is now worth $235,000 – that's a 213% gain since we revealed it a couple weeks ago. Trades like this are why I constantly suggest monitoring what members of Congress are trading via sites like QuiverQuant. Until they outlaw congressional trading, we should all be watching. They have access to non-public information, giving them a massive market advantage. Good luck out there!
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I don't know why nobody is talking about this, but since I reported that Nancy Pelosi bought shares of Tempest on MLK Day, shares of Tempest are up a 17% in just seventeen days. Now what's crazy about this is that she's actually up even more because if you remember the video, she didn't just buy shares of Tempest. She bought call options, which give her even more leverage. What that means is she isn't just up a 17%. Looking at the data, we can see that her original investment of $75,000 is now worth $235,000, a 213% since we disclosed it a couple weeks ago. Trades like this are exactly why I tell people that until they outlaw trading in congress, they should be checking QuiverQuant every day to see exactly what stocks members of of congress are buying and selling. Because at the end of the day, they have access to information that the public doesn't, which gives them a huge edge in the market. Good luck, and until next time.
PlanetOfMemes
Posted - April 4, 2025 at 9:10 PM
Saved - April 5, 2025 at 1:43 PM

@PlanetOfMemes - Planet Of Memes

AOC admits to Jon Stewart that members of Congress engage in insider trading. https://t.co/XdjD8hxWtU

Video Transcript AI Summary
There needs to be Democrats who walk the walk and talk the talk because hypocrisy gets exploited to fuel cynicism. Insider trading in Congress is a prime example. Members of Congress sit on a committee, get information about a drug or a contract, and immediately make a call to their stockbroker, changing things so their portfolio swells. This is done on public trust, taxpayer finance, and public facilities while regulating the market they're trading on. The speaker questions why people act like money only corrupts Republicans.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There need to be Democrats who walk the walk and talk the talk. There is an insane amount of hypocrisy, and the hypocrisy is what gets exploited to use the cynicism. And wherever there's a hypocritical window for example, I think one of the most, biggest examples of this is insider trading in congress. Like Speaker 1: Dude. I I don't know. I like I don't know if I like, do I give snaps? Do I I don't know what the kids do anymore, but, like, dude. It's Yes. It is like That's so crazy. Speaker 0: It's so crazy. Crazy. I mean, like that's the and this is the thing. It's like like people think that everyday people are stupid. I'm like, do do you all really think that people don't see this shit? Like Speaker 1: They sit on a committee, they get information about a drug or a contract or a thing. They immediately make a call, the stockbroker changes things and and their portfolio swells. Speaker 0: Explodes. It Speaker 1: explodes. What are we doing? Speaker 0: And you're doing this on public trust Speaker 1: Right. Speaker 0: On on, like, taxpayer finance, public, you know, facilities. Like, it of Speaker 1: course regulating the market that you're trading on. Speaker 0: Exactly. And Speaker 1: like run the casino. Speaker 0: And then we're supposed to act like money doesn't only corrupts Republicans. Give me a fucking break. They're
amuse
Posted - May 5, 2025 at 5:53 PM
Saved - May 5, 2025 at 8:08 PM

@amuse - @amuse

DOGE: Why is Senator Sheldon Whitehouse such a huge critic of DOGE and Elon Musk? Turns out he's been funneling millions to an NGO that pays his wife millions. His wife isn't paid by just one government funded NGO but two including the Atlantic Council. The corruption is deep.

TCNetworkFans
Posted - May 23, 2025 at 11:33 AM
Saved - May 24, 2025 at 1:13 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared my thoughts on why Democrats opposed DOGE's involvement with government funds, suggesting it was due to their attempts to hide billions in taxpayer money before Trump took office. I highlighted a 76-day period between Trump's election and Biden's departure, pointing out that the Department of Energy disbursed $93 billion from the Loan Program Office, which is more than double the amount distributed in the previous 15 years.

@TCNetworkFans - Tucker Carlson Network 🇺🇸 Fan Account

Want to know why Democrats didn't want DOGE poking around in government funds? Because they were stealing and trying to conceal BILLIONS in taxpayer funds before Donald Trump took office. “The 76-day period you're talking about, that's the period between the time that President Trump was elected and President Biden left office. How much taxpayer money went out the door of the Department of Energy? From the Loan Program Office in Loans and Commitments $93 billion. Well over twice as much as in the previous 15 years”

Video Transcript AI Summary
During a 76-day period between President Trump's election and President Biden leaving office, the Department of Energy's loan program issued $93 billion in loans and commitments, more than double the amount from the previous 15 years. The loans were sometimes given to entities lacking business plans or financial solvency. The department is now reviewing these loans and grants for theft and incompetence. Some applicants presented half-baked ideas, promising plans after receiving funds. The department's budget increased from $60 billion to $160 billion since fiscal year 2021. The department is reducing its headcount by thousands, which the secretary believes is common-sense business. The secretary credits President Trump for empowering departments to make necessary changes to better serve taxpayers and consumers.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Mister secretary, I wanna go back to some of your earlier testimony to be sure I heard it correctly. The seventy six day period you're talking about, that's the period between the time that president Trump was elected and president Biden left office. Is that right? That is correct. And during that short period of time, seventy six days, how much taxpayer money went out the door of the Department of Energy? Speaker 1: From the loan program office in loans and commitments, $93,000,000,000, well over twice as much as in Speaker 0: the previous fifteen years. So how do you vet and do due diligence on a loan in seventy six days. One loan, much less $93,000,000,000. How do you do it? Speaker 1: I I think it's probably pretty clear it wasn't done in many cases. As I mentioned, yeah, I'm told I'm holding back clearly in place stuff. There is lots of funds that have gone out the door and commitments that were made from businesses that provided no business plan, no numbers about their own financial solvency or how this project So you're telling Speaker 0: me that the Department of Energy in the seventy six day period before their boss was gonna leave office, gave our loan money to to entities that had no business plan? Correct. No financials? Speaker 1: Correct. A number of those were not were before the seventy six day period as well. That's that's I've I've come in with great concern about how this institution, this great American institution has been run and how American tax payer money has been handled. I'm sorry everyone's upset that we're taking some time to do it, but what we've seen I'm not upset. Shows I'm Speaker 0: not upset. Could it be that a lot of people say you haven't returned your calls? Could it be that you and your your colleagues have returned the calls, but the people calling just didn't like the answer? Could that be a possibility? Speaker 1: I'm not I'm not I'm not aware of that. You know, I give my cell phone number to any senator that wants it, and I return my calls. Speaker 0: I I I I I mean, is your is your department gone dark? Somebody said your department's gone dark. Is it dark over there? Speaker 1: Doesn't look it doesn't look dark behind me. Speaker 0: I don't see any of you sitting on your hands. Somebody made that charge. I see everybody's hands. Let me ask you something else, mister secretary. Does does anybody ever come to the Department of Energy to get some of this free money and lie to you? Speaker 1: I have not experienced that, but I I think it's a a reasonable assumption that that has happened. Does anybody ever come to you is or is it conceivable that some of these folks that heard about this free money came to you with a half baked idea? I think it's very conceivable. In fact, I've seen such plans that were half Speaker 0: baked with didn't have a business plan. Right? Speaker 1: Correct. A promise to develop one, to find a location Speaker 0: the money, and I'll develop the plan later. Speaker 1: Correct. And and now Speaker 0: you're going back through not money that's already been contracted, but you're going back through and checking each one of these loans and these grants to make sure there was no stealing, aren't you? We are. We are. Make sure there was no incompetence, aren't you? Is that correct? Speaker 1: We're looking at that, and and, yeah, my my blood pressure is rising right now just thinking about what we have seen and what did happen at Speaker 0: the moment. Gonna tell some of these boondoggles no, aren't you? Speaker 1: That's correct. And they're gonna be upset, aren't they? That's correct. And they ought to Speaker 0: be upset, shouldn't they? I don't think Speaker 1: they should be upset. I think they should be ashamed. Speaker 0: I am it's rare that I'm speechless, but I wanna be sure I understood. The people running the Department of Energy for president Biden's administration shoveled $93,000,000,000, not million, $93,000,000,000 out the door in seventy six days, and it just happened to be the time between when president Trump was elected and president Biden, their boss, was leaving. Is that right? Speaker 1: It is correct and distasteful. Confidence undermining. My god. Speaker 0: Look. I hope you take whatever time you need to go through all of these projects penny by penny. I mean, I I've heard this testimony today. Well, it'll cost jobs in my state. If somebody steals $50,000,000 and goes and spends the money in their state, that's that's gonna stimulate the economy, isn't it? Yes. It will. But that's still stealing, isn't it? And it's still illegal, isn't it? Yes. I mean, they were spending money at the Department of Energy like it was ditch water. Their budget went from $60,000,000,000 to a hundred and $60,000,000,000 since fiscal year two thousand twenty one. It just sounds to me like like there were a lot of people coming to the Department of Energy who had all four feet and their snout in the trough. And I hope if you I hope you'll turn down the boondoggles and refer the thieves to the Department of Justice. We will indeed. Speaker 1: Senator, the one complication in there too is mixed in there are good companies doing good things honestly with credible plans. And you're trying to separate the wheat from the chaff. Yes. That's what we're trying to do. That's our job, and we're doing it. But there's there's a lot of chaff. Speaker 0: Let me ask you one final question. Let me go back to how many employees you have. Now there have been some allegations today that that that you've you've cut tens of thousands of employees. Is that accurate? Speaker 1: Well, I think the allegations were thousands, and we we our headcount will ultimately be reduced by thousands, but we are doing it slowly. Thousand now? Speaker 0: Yes. And you think you can do it with fewer than 16,000? Speaker 1: Correct. What's wrong with that? I think it's just common sense business. Speaker 0: Yeah. Businesses do it every day in the real world. American taxpayers deserve it. That's never happened in in the federal government. I mean, it's easier to divorce your spouse than to get rid of a federal employee up here. That's not the way the world works, is it, mister secretary? It's not the Speaker 1: way the world should work. And I give enormous credit to president Trump who had the boldness to say if there's a right thing that needs to be done and it's difficult, please do it. And so, yes, this is new territory. This is not what happens normally in the federal government, but it is what needs to happen periodically in the federal government. And I give the credit to president Trump who's willing to take the heat and has set the departments free, make the changes you need to make to better serve American taxpayers and American consumers. And, across his administration, that's what's being done. Alright. On that Speaker 0: note, I just wanted to clear that up, mister secretary, because I I you know, I I don't know you to be a person who doesn't return his phone call.
Real_RobN
Posted - May 26, 2025 at 1:53 AM
Saved - May 27, 2025 at 5:38 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I discussed the failure of Republicans to codify DOGE cuts and questioned whether USAID's DOGE team has found any evidence of radical left Democrats, like Maxine Waters and Nancy Pelosi, receiving money directly from USAID. I believe that USAID and NGOs are intertwined with Congress, leading to issues like bribery and money laundering. I also referenced Elon Musk's confidence that a significant amount of this money returns to the U.S., suggesting that many members of Congress are unusually wealthy.

@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

Here is why Republicans failed to codify DOGE cuts. Has USAID’s DOGE team found any evidence that any of the radical left Democrats — such as Maxine Waters, Adam Schiff, Chuck Schumer, or Nancy Pelosi — have received money directly from USAID? Absolutely: USAID + NGOs (Government funded non-governmental organizations) = U.S. Congress—bribery, money laundering and racketeering. @elonmusk “I am highly confident that a bunch of that money comes back to the U.S. and lands in the pockets of those you just mentioned.. I’ll just say there’s a lot of strangely wealthy members of Congress.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker was asked if there is evidence that Maxine Waters, Adam Schiff, and Chuck Schumer have received money directly from USAID. The speaker responded that taxpayer money is sent to government organizations, then to NGOs, which are government-funded but not governed by U.S. laws. Money is sent overseas to NGOs and the speaker is confident that some of it returns to the U.S. and ends up with the aforementioned politicians. The speaker states that it's not a direct route, but that some members of Congress are strangely wealthy, accumulating millions while earning significantly less annually, which is unexplainable. The speaker says they are going to try to figure it out and stop it from happening.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: My question is about USAID. Has the Doge team found any evidence that any of the radical left Democrats like Maxine Waters, Adam Schiff, Chuck Schumer have received money directly from USAID? And if so, will we be hearing about that evidence anytime soon? Speaker 1: Yeah. So the the there is a massive amount of corruption, it it is circuitous. So what happens is there's money that obviously it's your taxpayer money that that is then sent to various government organizations who then send it to to NGOs, which which an NGO is a non governmental organization, but obviously, it's a government funded non governmental organization, it's just an organization, it's just the government. And effectively, there's a giant fraud loophole, which is that the the government can send money to an NGO that is then no longer governed by the law laws of The United States. So they'll they'll send the money overseas to one NGO, then they'll go through a bunch of bunch of them. And then I'm highly confident that a bunch of that money then comes back to The United States and lands in the pockets of the people you just mentioned. But it is a circuitous route. It's not like it it it doesn't go directly. But let's just say that there's a lot of strangely wealthy members of congress where I'm I just can't I'm I'm trying to connect the dots of how do they become rich while earning how do they get 20,000,000 if they're earning 200,000 a year? Sounds that's how how do I just nobody can explain that. So so so something's yeah. We we we we're gonna try to figure it out and and and and certainly stop it from happening. So
jnottah
Posted - August 12, 2025 at 5:10 PM
Saved - August 13, 2025 at 4:32 PM

@jnottah - Hatton, America is back

Queen of insider trading, Nancy Pelosi and don't forget her son Paul , who invested in Ukrainian energy, aka bioweapons labs. This scoundrel orchestrated the biggest FED INSURRECTION hoax in US history. Time for Pelosi to be indicted. https://t.co/gN05mqThgv

Video Transcript AI Summary
The reason I finished this card, we can pull it out for q and a. We can say we'll call for we don't know because we don't have all the blue dogs with us on this subject. I think that it was the plan that they briefed on with the numbers, stakeholders that have signed off on it. Terrible relationships with the union. He's particularly good, I think, not great handling this coronavirus pandemic with the workforce. But he's a strong leader. Very transparent about what he thought of other states that he may order, which were underestimating the crowd size and underestimating the president's influence on Saudi Arabia.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Gonna park because the diversionary is active. Speaker 1: Understood. Understood. So we can pull this card out. Let's see. The reason I finished this card, we can pull it out for q and a. Speaker 0: Okay. Then I we can't say we want p two. We can say we'll call for we don't know because we don't have all the blue dogs with us on this subject. Curious. So let's look at the words. Okay. What else you got? Speaker 2: I'm just finishing. Speaker 0: Well, I'm just saying Speaker 2: I think that it was the plan that they briefed on with the numbers, stakeholders that have signed off on it. We had some anxiety just about Speaker 0: Oh, he's not bad at the fourteenth. Speaker 2: Oh, was on our first choice report today. No. No. I he he was always been skeptical. Always always been skeptical of He's some. Terrible relationships with the union. He's particularly good, I think, not great handling this coronavirus pandemic with the workforce. He has done some good things well. He's hired well to sort of third tier rank. He's done some well at some things on the operational side. But he's a strong leader. Very transparent about what he thought of other states that he may order, which were underestimating the crowd size and underestimating the president's influence on Saudi Arabia. Speaker 0: And I will say that further announcing
BelannF
Posted - August 18, 2025 at 3:22 PM
Saved - August 19, 2025 at 1:33 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m concerned about politicians profiting from insider trading. For instance, Nancy Pelosi earns $174k annually but has a net worth of $413M. In 2024, her stock portfolio grew by 70%, surpassing all hedge funds. This raises questions about how she and others might be using their knowledge of upcoming legislation and government contracts to benefit financially before the information is public. It's crucial to address this issue to ensure fairness and integrity in our political system.

@BelannF - BelannF

WHAT NEEDS TO BE DONE ABOUT POLITICIANS PROFITING OFF OF INSIDER TRADING? EXAMPLE: Pelosi makes $174k per year - yet she has a net worth of $413M” "In 2024 Nancy Pelosi's stock portfolio grew by 70%, outperforming every single Hedge Fund." This is all done by Insider Trading, knowing what laws Congress is going to pass and which Corporations that will benefit (or sometimes harm), or major contracts the government is going to sign (or cancel), before the news reaches the markets or the general public.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The reason that this idea to put a ban on stock trading for members of congress is even a thing is because of Nancy Pelosi. She is is is rightfully criticized because she makes, think, a $174,000 a year, yet she has a net worth of approximately 413,000,000. In 2024, Nancy Pelosi's stock portfolio, this was a fascinating statistic to me, grew 70% in one year in 2024. And her portfolio outperformed every single large hedge fund in that same year and even more than doubled the returns of Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway. As for the mechanics of the legislation and how it will move forward, the White House continues to be in discussions with our friends on Capitol Hill.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The reason that this idea to put a ban on stock trading for members of congress is even a thing is because of Nancy Pelosi. I mean, she is is is rightfully criticized because she makes, think, a $174,000 a year, yet she has a net worth of approximately 413,000,000. In 2024, Nancy Pelosi's stock portfolio, this was a fascinating statistic to me, grew 70% in one year in 2024. And her portfolio outperformed every single large hedge fund in that same year and even more than doubled the returns of Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway. So think the president stands with the American people on this. He doesn't wanna see people like Nancy Pelosi enriching themselves off of public service and ripping off their constituents in the process. As for the mechanics of the legislation and how it will move forward, the White House continues to be in discussions with our friends on Capitol Hill.
WallStreetApes
Posted - April 13, 2026 at 11:00 AM
Saved - April 13, 2026 at 5:45 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
WOAH. Just days before Rep Ayanna Pressley’s swearing-in, her husband quit a $92k job to start a consulting firm. Net worth with assets reportedly jumped to $8M. Every time you see a politician with a 'consulting firm' it’s taxpayer money laundering.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

WOAH 🚨 JUST DAYS before Democrat Rep Ayanna Pressley was sworn into Congress, her husband quit a $92,000 a year job TO START A CONSULTING FIRM Net worth with assets skyrocketed to $8 million Every time you see a politician with a ‘consulting firm’ its taxpayer money laundering https://t.co/GeAQ4DeniI

Video Transcript AI Summary
Fox News reports allege wealth increases among prominent progressive lawmakers. The segment claims Ilhan Omar is worth up to $30,000,000, noting she rose from negative net worth when first elected to Congress to substantial wealth, with a husband who is a consultant. The piece centers on Ayanna Pressley, stating that when she was elected in 2018 she had a negative net worth, but today she is worth $1,300,000 with assets up to $8,000,000. It highlights property holdings in 2024: a Martha’s Vineyard rental worth up to $5,000,000 and multiple Boston rentals worth up to $1,000,000 each, contrasting with 2019 when she reportedly owned only one property in Boston. The report also notes that days before Pressley was sworn in, her husband left a $92,000-a-year Boston City Hall job to launch Conan Harris and Associates, a consulting firm. It states his income reportedly jumped while in Washington, with a client list including government organizations and one with deep ties to the Obama Foundation. The segment describes ethics concerns about using his city-issued email to pitch Walsh’s Chief of Staff on staying on as a consultant, while city officials say they did not solicit nor accept the offer and that ethics laws bar municipal employees from using official resources for personal gain. Pressed for comment, Pressley did not respond to Fox Business requests. Fox Business anchor David Asman appears to align with the report’s framing, acknowledging that wealth accumulation through government contacts is common but asserting questions arise about those who position themselves as anti-capitalist. David Asman contrasts the situation with what he describes as anti-capitalist squad members who denounce capitalism yet accumulate wealth, asserting that Pressley and her fellow squad members “condemn capitalism” while “she’s the one who’s been pillaging the government,” and noting her husband’s consulting income. The discussion broadens to Ilhan Omar, claimed to be worth up to $30,000,000, with a husband who is also a consultant and previously connected to progressive circles with alleged anti-capitalist leanings. The segment references Nancy Pelosi as part of a broader pattern, describing her as “the grand dam of all this,” and asserts she is worth about $275,000,000, with husband Paul Pelosi, suggesting insider information influenced certain trades tied to credit card companies. The speakers argue that such patterns illustrate long-standing issues, vowing continued investigation and pressure to stop perceived abuses. Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 close with remarks that this situation requires ongoing scrutiny, and they thank David Asman for the discussion.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is a Fox News alert. It looks like Ilhan Omar isn't the only millionaire squad member. Our team dug into open secrets and financial disclosure reports. What we found is that when Ayanna Pressley was elected to Congress back in 2018, she had a negative net worth. You fast forward to today, she's worth $1,300,000 with assets worth up to 8,000,000. Now that's a massive increase in just six years, especially for someone on a $174,000 congressional salary. It's impressive, really. But how did she do it? Well, part of its property in 2024, Presley reported owning a Martha's Vineyard rental worth up to $5,000,000 as well as multiple Boston rentals worth up to $1,000,000 each. Now for context, back in 2019, she only reported owning one property in Boston. We're also learning days before Presley was sworn into Congress, her husband quit his $92,000 annual Boston City Hall job to start his own consulting firm called Conan Harris and Associates. And as we read more of the congresswoman's financial disclosure reports, we learned that her husband also saw his income jump while he was in Washington. His client list consists of some government organizations, including one with deep ties to the Obama Foundation. But as he started his firm and seek new clients, he faced ethics concerns because of Presley's job in Congress. As Harris's days dwindled in the city's Office of Public Safety, he used his city issued email account to pitch Walsh's Chief of Staff on staying on as a consultant. City officials say they did not solicit nor accept the offer, and state ethics laws bar municipal employees from knowingly using official resources for personal gain. Now we asked Presley for comment, and we even invited her on. She did not answer, but Fox Business anchor David Asman joins me now. He's been looking over this information, and David, there's nothing wrong with, you know, gaining financial resources. We see this a lot in congress, but there are questions. Speaker 1: Well, you go back to the 1930s, the last when movies began, Mr. Smith Goes to Washington. I mean, it's happened for a long time. It happens in both the right and left, but what's so rich is that this is coming from anti capitalist squad members. Know? Yes. People who spent their life denigrating our capitalist system and saying how bad it was. In fact, congresswoman Presley came out with an ex post just a year ago. She and her fellow squad members, of course, constantly condemn capitalism, but she says Donald Trump and Musk want big banks and bad actors to run rampant and take people for a ride. They want to pillage the government and make themselves rich. Well, she's the one who's been pillaging the government. Now again, we're not suggesting she's going in and stealing funds or anything like that, but the fact is she got rich off of her contacts in government. Her husband got rich consulting with members of the business community and others, perhaps some people who were taking grants. That's, by the way, we saw that with Lee Zeldin, the EPA Commissioner. When he came in, he found out that right before Biden left office in December 2024, he was spending billions of dollars. A lot of that money was going directly to friends, you know, to acquaintances within the Democratic community that learned how to go in and write grants that would get accepted, making millions and millions of dollars each one of them. So, this has been going on for a while. I should mention that Presley's kind of a poor gal next to her friend Ilhan Omar. Yes. Because Ilhan Omar is worth up to $30,000,000 right now because, and she went from basically a flat to negative, if not negative point when she came into Congress. She also has a husband who's a consultant. He was working with progressive leftists who, again, have this anti capitalist creed which they live and die by, but apparently, they, it's very easy to condemn capitalism when you're making millions of dollars, And of course, we have to mention the grand dam of all this, which is Ms. Pelosi. Speaker 0: Oh, yeah. Speaker 1: Who's worth about $275,000,000 at least $275,000,000 with her husband Paul, who, and, you know, he's a good investor, but she's come to him, I'm sure, with excellent inside information that we're not allowed to trade on, but members of Congress still do, and there are certain trades that she and her husband made that clearly were based on information she was getting about credit card companies that were going to have a particular advantage that other companies didn't have. A lot of So this has got to stop. We've tried to stop it time and time again. Again, going back decades and decades, it never seems to work properly. Schweizer has done his best to try to try to come out with revealing stuff, but we're going to continue investigating and put pressure on the politicians to stop this once and for all. Speaker 0: David Asman, thank you. Lots of questions here.
Ric_RTP
Posted - June 15, 2026 at 2:11 PM
Saved - June 15, 2026 at 11:29 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m seeing a seven-layer AI (GovGreed) cross-reference every congressional stock disclosure with committee control, votes, and campaign donations. It flags 343/540 members trading with nonpublic information, 56% of buys tied to later votes, 752 “Triple Signals” where bills pass 5.4x faster, and cites multiple STOCK Act late filings plus tiny $200 fines and zero prosecutions.

@Ric_RTP - Ricardo

This AI just exposed the BIGGEST legal insider trading operation in America. A platform called GovGreed built a seven-layer machine learning system that cross-references every stock trade disclosed by every sitting politician against the bills their committees control, the campaign donations they receive, and the companies their votes directly impact. It scored all 540 politicians currently in Congress. And the numbers are crazy: 56% of every stock purchase made by Congress in the last 16 months was on a stock directly affected by a bill the buyer later voted on. That is 6,170 out of 11,016 total purchases. More than HALF of all congressional stock buys are on companies whose fate that same politician is about to decide. 343 of 540 Congress members actively trade stocks while holding access to nonpublic legislative information. That is 63.8% of the entire legislature making market bets with an informational edge that would put any hedge fund manager in prison. The AI identified 752 active "Triple Signals" in the current Congress. A Triple Signal fires when three conditions line up at once: The politician sits on the committee controlling a bill, they traded stock in a company affected by that bill, AND they received campaign contributions from that same industry. Bills carrying these insider indicators pass at 5.4 TIMES the normal rate. Now look at the individual leaderboard: - Nancy Pelosi's estimated portfolio sits at $194 million with a Greediness score of 98.1 out of 100 - Ro Khanna made 13,231 trades across 800+ different tickers - Michael McCaul made 32,302 trades and filed 6,670 of them late - Thomas Suozzi filed 86.4% of his trades late with an average delay of 396 days, meaning his disclosures landed over a YEAR after he made the trade And then there is Lisa McClain, the fourth-ranking Republican in the House. She has made 1,443 trades in three years, more than 98% of all politicians tracked. She violated the STOCK Act twice in a single year, disclosing up to $900,000 in trades months after the legal deadline. Her husband bought up to $250,000 in Elon Musk's xAI, which quietly converted into SpaceX equity before last Friday's $2 trillion IPO. The penalty for all of this? A $200 fine. The number of Congress members ever prosecuted under the STOCK Act since it passed in 2012? Zero. And the cruelest part is this: A bill to ban congressional stock trading was introduced in January 2026. It has bipartisan support. Over 80% of American voters want it passed. But Congress is sitting on it, because the people who would have to vote yes are the same people making millions from the system staying exactly the way it is. They write the insider trading laws, they exempt themselves from enforcement, they trade on the information those laws generate, and when they get caught, they pay a fine that is basically nothing. The AI didn't discover anything Congress was hiding. It just organized what was already public into a pattern so obvious that nobody can pretend it isn't there anymore.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Senator asks whether the SEC should investigate President Trump for stock trading behavior similar to what would trigger SEC attention if done by private citizens, referencing a prior statement that the SEC would be knocking on a private citizen’s door for trading like members of Congress. The Secretary responds that if the body wants to ban individual stock trading (advocating for it for the committee), it should start there, and that further legislative action is the body’s prerogative. When pressed, the Secretary says the trade “should be investigated” and that “President Trump should be investigated,” supporting the idea of “getting your house in order.” The Senator then asks about an investigation into White House conduct and the Secretary answers with “Please lead by example,” which the Senator repeats, saying they want the President to lead by example. The Senator asks a separate question: if the stock purchases were made using inside information, would that be illegal. The Secretary declines to answer, saying they are not a lawyer. The Senator then asks whether it would be worth investigating, and the Secretary responds that the Senator is the one who said what should be investigated, suggesting that “we investigate many people in this committee.” Senator asks whether the White House should follow the same set of rules already in law. The Secretary again emphasizes “get your house in order here,” and adds that committee members, “mostly on your side of the aisle,” should do the same. The Senator concludes by arguing for stronger anti-corruption and conflict-of-interest rules in Washington for everyone, including the president and Congress, and states that draining the swamp is not happening because “what Donald Trump is doing is he is enriching himself by taking advantage of his position,” which the Senator calls not public service, reiterating that the president should lead by example.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You said last year if any private citizen traded the way members of Congress do, quote, the SEC would be knocking on their door. So my question is, should the SEC be knocking on President Trump's door to start an investigation over this trade? Speaker 1: Again, if this body wants to ban individual stock trading, which I would advocate for yourselves, start there. And if you want legislative action to continue, that's your prerogative. Speaker 0: So it's our prerogative. So you would support our saying that President Trump should be investigated over this? Speaker 1: Our trade should be investigated and President Trump should be investigated. I would support you getting your house in order, Senator. Speaker 0: And how about the White House getting its house in order? Would you support that investigation? Speaker 1: Please lead by example. Speaker 0: I would like to see the President of the United States lead by example. So, Secretary Besset, let me ask you a different question. If these stock purchases... that Trump made were made using inside information. Would that be illegal? Speaker 1: Again, I'm not a lawyer. I'm not going to speak to that. Speaker 0: Would it be worth investigating? Speaker 1: You don't have to be a lawyer. You're the one who said what should be investigated. Why don't we investigate many people in this committee, Senator? Many people. Speaker 0: And you don't think the White House should have to follow the same set of rules that are already the law? Speaker 1: I think you should get your house in order here. Speaker 0: My house is in order. Thank you, Mr. Secretary. Speaker 1: And you should have your fellow committee members, many on your, mostly on your side of the aisle, do the same. Speaker 0: We need stronger anti-corruption rules and conflict of interest rules in Washington for everyone. And that includes the president, and it includes Congress. And instead of draining the swamp, what Donald Trump is doing is he is enriching himself by taking advantage of his position. That is not public service. He's the one who should lead by example.
View Full Interactive Feed