reSee.it - Related Post Feed

Saved - April 7, 2024 at 2:30 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I witnessed a disturbing incident while filming a police-escorted #BLM parade in Georgetown. I was physically assaulted and had my phone snatched. Thankfully, a nearby restaurant owner came to my aid. The police are investigating and have assured me they have their own recordings of the incident. It's important to expose the truth and not fear those who oppose it.

@ReaganBabe - Megan Barth

Watch how “peaceful” #BLM protestors coordinate, surround and then attack me-simply because I am filming their police-escorted parade in the middle of Georgetown. I was physically assaulted and one of them snatched my phone. An owner of a nearby restaurant came fo my aid. https://t.co/W6wPooJvKU

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 asks Speaker 1 to keep going for safety. Speaker 1 disagrees and is asked to leave. Speaker 1 mentions harm caused. Speaker 0 tells Speaker 1 they don't have to stay for the recording.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: For Whatever. Thank you. No. Please For my safety, keep going. Okay. Speaker 1: Hey. You got it all wrong. You got it all wrong. Speaker 0: Uh-huh. And we would very appreciate it. And I would appreciate it if you'd get out of my face. Speaker 1: This has caused a lot more harm to us than Speaker 0: You don't have to stand here while I record.

@ReaganBabe - Megan Barth

I am physically fine, slightly bruised on my neck, my phone was recovered. The police asked, which one attacked you? Note: it’s hard to know who attacked you when you’re being surrounded and attacked from all sides.

@ReaganBabe - Megan Barth

The police then told me they were also recording so they know who attacked me.

@ReaganBabe - Megan Barth

What do communists fear most? Exposure. I don’t fear communists. I expose them.

Saved - March 26, 2024 at 9:36 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
While campaigning at Walmart, I was attacked by a woman who identified as a "super liberal." She scratched me after I expressed my disbelief in trans children. I will be pressing charges and have video evidence from the incident, which occurred at the Walmart in Arab, Alabama during my campaign for district 27.

@billysandytodd - Dr. Interracial 🇺🇸

I was out campaigning at Walmart and was attacked by a woman who called herself a “super liberal.” She charged at me and scratched me after I told her I didn’t believe in trans children. https://t.co/m4JKXybf58

@billysandytodd - Dr. Interracial 🇺🇸

I should have the police video from Walmart tomorrow and I’m pressing charges.

@billysandytodd - Dr. Interracial 🇺🇸

I told her I didn’t want to debate her anymore, walked away, and she charged at me, I put my arms up, and she scratched my arm, I held her down until the police came. It’s all on video, and witnesses.

@billysandytodd - Dr. Interracial 🇺🇸

This happened at the Walmart in Arab Alabama while campaigning for district 27.

Saved - October 12, 2024 at 3:27 AM

@BillboardChris - Billboard Chris 🇨🇦🇺🇸

This woman (who says she’s trans) tried to destroy my phone, and then threw hot coffee on me. Yes, she was arrested! https://t.co/svyXT7zHEK

Video Transcript AI Summary
A person is confronted and accused of being a transphobe who believes "trans kids should be cis kids." The person asks what makes a child trans and what gender is. Another person states you are born trans and gender is a spectrum, like a rainbow. A trans person says the person is playing god and "it fucks kids up." The trans person says the person should be ashamed and that they matter. The person being confronted asks someone to call the police, claiming assault. The trans person says the person is abusive and is spewing hate, not even knowing what gender is. The trans person encourages people to come down and tell the person that trans kids have rights. The person states they are waiting for police because they were assaulted.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Why should I be ashamed of myself? Why should I be ashamed of myself? Speaker 1: I'm not going on. Because Speaker 2: you're anti trans. You're a transphobe standing on the corner going, trans kids should be cis kids. Well, you know what? Trans kids are trans kids, and they shouldn't have to be trapped in their fucking body. Speaker 0: What makes a child trans? Speaker 2: You're born trans. Speaker 0: What does that mean? Speaker 2: Gender is a spectrum. Speaker 0: Yeah? Speaker 1: How do we know? Speaker 0: Spectrum of what? Speaker 2: If I'm not god Speaker 0: A spectrum of what? Speaker 2: I'm god, a spectrum of gender. Speaker 0: Yeah. What does that mean? Speaker 2: Everything's a spectrum, like the color, the rainbow. Mhmm. That's why it's for the LGBTQ community is because color is a spectrum. So is gender. That's why there's gender studies in university. Speaker 0: So what's gender? Speaker 1: Nobody knows. Nobody knows. You know why? Speaker 0: This is the point. Right? Speaker 2: You're not god. Yeah. Speaker 1: But you're playing god. And it fucks kids up. You know how I know? I'm a trans person. Speaker 0: How are you? Speaker 1: Yeah. So go fuck yourself. Speaker 0: Good stuff. Speaker 1: Yeah. You're a fucking asshole. Speaker 0: Do not touch me. Yeah? Do not. Speaker 1: You should be fucking ashamed of yourself. Every trans every kid fucking matters. Every kid matters. Every kid matters. I fucking matter. I'm a trans person who is saying Speaker 0: Can you call the police, please? Speaker 1: Are an abusive person. Speaker 0: Go fuck yourself. Just walk with me. Let's call the police. That's an assault. Speaker 1: Shut the fuck up. No. Speaker 0: It's an assault. Speaker 1: Go ahead. Speaker 0: Yeah. I'll keep walking with you. Touch Speaker 1: the face. Speaker 0: Well, I wouldn't mind. Oh, I know. Yeah. You're an asshole. How is it that you were born in the wrong body? What does that mean? You can't you tell me you don't even know what gender is, but you're transgender. Speaker 1: I told you what gender is. It's a spectrum. Speaker 0: A spectrum of what? Gender. Oh, makes a lot of sense. But I can't argue with the stupid. No. You can't even define the basic terminology. With Speaker 1: a camera, and that's a fuse. Speaker 0: Yeah. Because I'm waiting for police to come so you can be arrested. Yeah. There are consequences when you assault someone. Speaker 1: Anybody that follows me on Instagram, which is a lot of fucking people, this is Zaydo, trans comedian from Victoria. This guy is such an asshole. He's chasing me down the street. He won't leave me alone. Get the fuck away from me. He is on St. Lawrence and Menzies. Everybody come down and tell this guy that trans kids have rights just like everybody else. Trans kids matter. Trans kids are trans kids that deserve to grow up as trans children. Not forced to be cisgender children. Not forced to go to cisgender puberty. This guy wants trans children to suffer. You know how evil that is? I am a trans person standing here in the middle of the street saying that this guy is just spewing fucking hate. He doesn't even know what gender is. He doesn't know it's a spectrum. He's just about how do you know what gender are you on? You know how he knows what gender is? Because he's probably got a tiny little dick in his pants and he's like, yeah. I'm a man. He doesn't even know what trans kids have to do to figure out who they are. You know how smart trans kids are? They're way smarter than you. You look like you have a fucking tear on your head. You're a asshole. And this is going all over social media. I have a huge following here in Victoria. Speaker 0: It's tough. Speaker 1: Abiduity. Oh. My name is Ayo. Send send it to my house. Well I don't get a shit. Speaker 0: I'll just keep walking with you here. Got Speaker 1: no fuckers out. Speaker 0: Wait for the police to come. Trying to cut through the hotel, are we? That's no problem. Police are coming. This guy assaulted me. Whatever. Oh, this person assaulted me. I'm waiting for police. Seems to be trying to cut through your hotel. Yeah. I'm waiting for police for this person. Is there a way out down there? Speaker 1: Yeah. But you can't be in here doing that. Speaker 0: Okay. Well, this person assaulted me, and I'm waiting for police, and I'm not gonna lose them. Speaker 1: Well, the only way he's gonna go through the parkade, Speaker 0: which is gonna Speaker 1: come out the back. Speaker 0: That's good. I'll just wait for police. Speaker 1: Yeah. You tell the police to come in here. Speaker 0: Where's is there a way out of here through here? I'm waiting for police. That person assaulted me, and she's trying to get away right now or he, whatever. Speaker 1: Well, there isn't no. Speaker 2: You can't be Speaker 0: Okay. But there's no way out of here? So when police come, I can tell them to come down here? Speaker 2: Yes, sir. Yeah. Speaker 0: Okay. Good. Alright.
Saved - October 17, 2024 at 11:32 PM

@DiligentDenizen - Diligent Denizen 🇺🇸

🚨🇺🇸BREAKING- The clerk at the Beaver Courthouse just tried telling us that we could not record inside, and when @ScottPresler schooled her, she responded by telling us to "go f*ck ourselves" These liberals in the government are TRIGGERED that we are here and that we are winning https://t.co/Iv1EatlYC7

Video Transcript AI Summary
A person filming at the Beaver County Courthouse claims that a staff member at a desk told them to "go fuck yourself." The person states they announced their intention to film while casting their ballots.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Did you just say go fuck yourself? I've got that on film, everybody. We're here at the Beaver County Courthouse where one of the staffers sitting right here at this desk where we're about to go vote came out and told us to go fuck ourselves. We said that we were gonna film in the courthouse when we go cast our ballots. Pretty interesting.
Saved - December 11, 2024 at 1:09 PM

@RepNancyMace - Rep. Nancy Mace

I was physically accosted tonight on Capitol grounds over my fight to protect women. Capitol police have arrested him. All the violence and threats keep proving our point. Women deserve to be safe. Your threats will not stop my fight for women! #HoldTheLine

Saved - December 11, 2024 at 11:12 AM

@libsoftiktok - Libs of TikTok

BREAKING: Rep Nancy Mace was violently assaulted at the Capitol today by an LGBTQ Trans activist. The attacker has been arrested. All for not wanting men in women’s bathrooms. Why do Democrats always resort to violence? https://t.co/X5bNSGuZ1l

Saved - December 11, 2024 at 9:25 PM

@libsoftiktok - Libs of TikTok

A man walked into the Capitol yesterday and physically assaulted a Representative. Has a single Democrat member of Congress condemned this violent attack on a woman?

@libsoftiktok - Libs of TikTok

Nancy Mace appears in a hand brace after being assaulted by an LGBTQ activist in the Capitol. This epidemic of Leftist violence is very alarming. https://t.co/kFW01PrbJx

Saved - December 23, 2024 at 4:39 AM

@Bubblebathgirl - Paul A. Szypula 🇺🇸

AOC’s staffers ASSAULT journalist @nicksortor as AOC runs away from his border question. She then lies and says that Nick was touching her. Only on 𝕏 do you see the real dirty truth of how disgraceful lawmakers act. https://t.co/prAe0D5H9v

Video Transcript AI Summary
Ocasio-Cortez discusses the impact of the border crisis on her district. Tensions rise as she confronts an individual who is physically blocking her path. She expresses frustration over being touched and insists on her right to move freely. The interaction becomes heated as she questions whether the individual is engaging with the Biden administration about border issues. Despite the confrontation, she maintains her focus on the pressing concerns affecting her constituents.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's Ocasio Cortez. Your yeah. So your district is really suffering under the the pressure of the border crisis. What? Why why are Don't I'm sorry. Don't try to get through this floor, man. Don't touch me. What do you What? Your your your district is very much suffering for the border crime. Right? Border crime. Why will you not no. You're out of my way. Excuse me, sir. Just go out of my way. Get dude, fucking get your hands off me. What? You're going upstairs, man. Relax. Stop flaxing me. Sir, are you talking to the Biden administration about about thank you, about fixing the border that you get off of me? What is wrong with you? You have to touch me on the stairs. Thank you. I did not touch you. I have an old video.
Saved - January 22, 2025 at 3:48 PM

@WalterHudson - Walter Hudson

FULL VIDEO: Today I sat exposed as a 450 pound criminal repeatedly approached me within two feet and screamed in my face with a bullhorn. At any moment, it could have turned violent and there would have been little I could have done to avoid harm. Democrats? Silent. https://t.co/IL5mY2ZXQu

Video Transcript AI Summary
Whose house is this? Our house. We’re done with the disrespect and the lack of quorum. You’ve ignored our rights and concerns, prioritizing trivial matters over equal rights in Minnesota. This is unacceptable. We will not comply with your sham meetings or your attempts to undermine our community. We demand respect and accountability. You don’t have the authority to take our rights away. We’re here to stand up for our rights, and we won’t back down. We will continue to raise our voices until you acknowledge us and stop the legislative coup. This is our house, and we will fight for our rights.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Whose house is this? Our house. Whose house is this? Our house. Speaker 1: You chicken meatball headed motherfucker. Whose house is this? Whose house. Whose house is this? Our house. Whose house is this? Speaker 0: Yeah. That would kick Speaker 1: me out. It would be on every fucking news organization in the country. Done. Done with this shit. You do not have quorum. You are not allowed to do this, and you know it. You're not just gonna keep pushing the fucking line. You're just gonna keep overstepping your rounds just like y'all did last session when I had to sit there and listen to y'all motherfuckers talk about what burgers you like instead of giving us equal rights in Minnesota. I'm done with it. I sat through the whole trans refuge thing listening to you fucking lie about my community. I sat and listened to every Culver's fucking bullshit order instead of giving equal rights and bodily autonomy to all Minnesotans. I'm done with it. The senate threw a big baby fucking tantrum at the end of the session last year. It was a goddamn clown show, and I'm tired of it. If y'all aren't gonna respect decorum, if y'all aren't gonna follow the fucking rules, then neither are we. Fuck you. Fuck you. Fuck you. Fuck you. Fuck you. Fuck you. I'm done with it. Get your good glamour shots there, motherfucker. I remember the shit that you said on the fucking floor. I remember the shit that you said misgendering Lee Finkie lying about us. Go fuck yourself. I'm done with this. We're done. No. This is not legitimate committee. I can stand here and fucking yell all day. I don't give a shit. You wanna drag me out? We're gonna have a bunch of cameras on us including that one that we're gonna put on all the news organizations. We're done. Stop. We're fucking Stop Speaker 0: the coup. Stop the coup. Stop the coup. Speaker 1: Stop the Stop smug asshole when you don't have fun to even have this fucking committee. I'm done with it. No. Don't bang your fucking gavel. Listen while the adults are talking, motherfucker. We're done with this shit. We're absolutely done with it. Get the fuck out of here. Come back when there's actual committees, when you actually have quorum, when you actually have a power sharing agreement. This is fucking bullshit and you know it. Our house. Speaker 0: Our house. Our house. Speaker 1: I can't hear you. Speak up. Use your big boy, boys, motherfucker. What? What? Exactly. Shut the fuck up. You're not supposed to be here. This is our fucking house. We are the citizens. You're not taking our rights away from us. You're not fucking moving in silence. You're not coming and having your fake little fucking meetings. We're done. I have to sit here and watch all you most marketers, including you, talk shit about my fucking community. Those fucking tricksters Literally argue in a post committee meeting that we should deserve to fucking die if we have sex with a man and he doesn't know we're trans. Don't fuck yourself, dude. I'm done with it. I'm so done with all your bullshit. You wanna drag me out? Be my fucking guest. Come get me. But it's gonna be on the news. Everyone's gonna know what the fuck y'all are up to, and we're done with it. Whose house is it? Idaho. Who's house is it? Idaho. Who's house is it? Idaho. Speaker 0: Who's house is it? Idaho. Who's house is it? Idaho. Who's house is it? Speaker 1: Idaho. Who's house is it? Right. We will not comply. Speaker 0: We will not comply. Speaker 1: We will not comply. Speaker 0: We will not comply. Speaker 1: We will not comply. We will Speaker 0: not comply. Speaker 1: We will not comply. Speaker 0: We will not comply. We will not comply. We know I'm Speaker 1: done with that. Shut your fucking mouth. You work for me. This is bullshit. You do not deserve to be here. You know it. All y'all fucking liars. This is our goddamn house. You do not have quorum. We do not spend our literal blood, sweat, and tears fighting for equal rights in Minnesota to have y'all stomp all over in your old taboo attempt. This is bullshit. Mhmm. I'm done with it. What what do we want? Quorum. When do we want it? Now. What do we want? Quorum. What when do we want it? Now. What do we want? Speaker 0: Quorum. When do we want it? Now. What do we want? Quorum. Speaker 1: What do we want? I'm done. What do Speaker 0: we want? The world. We're staying Speaker 1: here until all y'all file Speaker 0: out, go home, Speaker 1: and fire out your mind, and think about what the fuck you're doing in the state of Minnesota. You're done with it. Now. I'm done sitting here. I'm done sitting here talking now. Stop all over my right. Speaker 0: Who's house? Who's house? Who's house? Who's house? Who's house? Who's house? Who's house? Who's house? Who's house? Who's house? Who's house? Who's house? Who's house? Who's house? Who's house? Who's house? Who's house? Who's house? Who's house? Who's house? Who's house? Who's house? Who's house? Who's house? Who's house? Speaker 1: Who's house? Who's house Speaker 2: Quorum. When do we want it? Now. What do we want? Quorum. When do we want it? Now. What do we want? Quorum. When do we want it? Now. What do we want? Quorum. When do we want it? Now. Speaker 1: Equal rights now. Equal rights now. We are showing that we are done taking those bullshit. We're not gonna stand here, and let's just stop all over our minds as Minnesota citizens. Right. Now, as many cops, you have great security in here as you want. Back? We're done. Yes. I'm gonna keep that. I said, I'm gonna lay fucking clean. We are done. This is a chance, Desmond. Speaker 0: You have no right to be here. No. Y'all fucking Speaker 1: know it. No. And you'll be You have no fucking right to be here. You can smirk all you want. You can have little chitchats all you fucking want. You don't deserve to be here. You don't. And you know it. That fucking haunts you every night when you go to sleep. You are stealing power from the Minnesota people. You are attempting a legislative coup of the government. Just because it happens with Speaker 0: a pen Speaker 1: and paper and meeting notes and a bunch of tax advisers doesn't make it any less of a coup. Speaker 0: And the You know it. And the coup. Speaker 1: Knock it off. Speaker 0: And the coup. And the coup. And the coup. And the coup. And the coup. And the coup. And the coup. And the coup. And the Speaker 1: busy lady, Speaker 0: And Speaker 1: all night, talking to your phone all night. I heard what you said in this past 2 sessions. Your bullshit is getting trans women killed. Your bullshit is affecting my community. Your bullshit is why I keep having to bury my sisters. You need to knock it off. Go away from my personal space. Speaker 2: I am Stop yelling on my face. Speaker 1: Standing right here. I am giving you Speaker 0: a walk on request Speaker 1: to respect my personal affairs. You can have someone drag him out. That just as you have defied multiple lawful orders from officers. Speaker 0: There and Speaker 1: lost you. Break house This is all evidence that is going to be surrounded at your trial, which you are going to face. And in your lawsuit, which you are going to face. I'm not listening. And I hope you're ready for it. I'm gonna stand here and tell you what I'm gonna say. I don't give a shit. If you wanna fucking if you wanna make the mistake that all these other people didn't make, and you wanna have Are you afraid to be in sync or y'all could be You care so much about your voice, but you won't show your face. Speaker 0: We won't show your face. Speaker 1: We hope we're trying to prevent people from getting fucking sick. The only reason I have my Speaker 0: offer is Speaker 1: so I can yell at motherfuckers like you for having sham sessions in the house. You know it. I know even with your University of Phoenix degree that you know that.
Saved - February 8, 2025 at 9:24 AM

@bennyjohnson - Benny Johnson

🚨BREAKING: Rep. Maxine Waters and other Democrat Congress members are staging an insurrection at the Dept of Education over Trump and Elon Musk, but they’re getting the door slammed in their faces. https://t.co/4QbgT0ku1Z

Video Transcript AI Summary
Members of Congress are confronting private security blocking their access to the Department of Education. They question whether the security personnel were instructed to prevent them from entering. The Congress members emphasize their roles as elected representatives advocating for children, particularly those with disabilities, and express frustration over the lack of transparency and access. They highlight the contradiction of allowing billionaires into the building while denying entry to lawmakers. The situation escalates as they assert their right to advocate for the public and demand accountability from those in charge. The Congress members stress that they are not a threat and are simply trying to fulfill their responsibilities.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Do they know the way that people are moving? Speaker 1: Max, ask the question again. That's important. Were you told are you making this decision to stand in front of this door on your own behalf, on behalf of Department of Education, or were you told to come out here and block numbers of content and write the dots? Dear minds are off. Speaker 2: So everybody's What is that? Speaker 3: We're doing our jobs. Speaker 4: We're trying to say Speaker 0: We're trying to say We're trying to say Show me your ID. Speaker 1: Were you told to spam here, or did you decide to stand here and block members of Congress from other sources of education? Access. Speaker 2: To federal well-being. Who says Speaker 0: that you're not the private Speaker 2: members of congress. Speaker 0: Members of congress. Or maybe he doesn't understand. Do you Speaker 2: not understand? Private security contractors is making the decision to block members of congress from asset from a public access entrance. Speaker 3: I don't think he knows Speaker 2: You have the authority as a private security contractor to block members of congress. That that that has been knighted and granted to you. Speaker 3: I'm not sure Speaker 0: if you have Speaker 2: You have Speaker 1: to at least let us go to the desk. Yeah. Speaker 4: Okay. And when it goes to the Speaker 0: desk, there's many different Speaker 3: questions to change. Speaker 4: Who told you to do this? Open the door. I see it now. Speaker 0: So do you do you understand who members Speaker 3: of congress are? Speaker 0: I got it. Yeah. Speaker 4: And you Speaker 3: don't care. Huawei then. Speaker 0: I got a job over there. Speaker 3: You don't care. We have the job to do. We're not dangerous people. We're not I don't know. We're members of congress. There are no thieves and thugs out here. We're members of congress. We're parents. We're teachers. Speaker 0: Each in the bible Speaker 2: says 400 Speaker 0: right now. Speaker 1: You were elected to this. This is our job. Speaker 0: This is our job. This is Speaker 3: our job. We're doing our job. Speaker 1: Oh, wow. You're securing this building against who? Speaker 3: Members of congress. Members of congress. Who are you taking? Speaker 2: The people. This is the beginning of full transparency of this administration. That's right. The administration that talked about they're gonna open the doors to all of the these things and and show the American public what is going on. Grants They won't even open the door to this building, to members of congress. We are not posing any threat here. No. No. We are not dangerous people. We have not done any Let us try to request a meeting, and they won't they have a private security contractor who, on his own, is making decisions on behalf of the Department of Education. Speaker 0: We are not at the partnership with Hayes, which is saying is they're not they allow billionaires and his minions to come in to this Speaker 2: building. I don't know who he is, but I know who I am. And I'm a member of congress with oversight responsibilities trying to request a meeting, and a private security contractor is not allowing me to enter the building. And what do Speaker 0: you say about billionaires go in this building but not the access representatives. They have all billionaires and their cronies still lying, but not there's a lack of transparency here. The members of congress, the people of representatives are not allowed in. This is not transparent. Speaker 1: They're locking our kids down. Speaker 3: Well, they not only are they not Speaker 1: letting us sit, now they've called the Department of Homeland Security. Speaker 3: We are members of Congress Speaker 0: here to talk. We have a Speaker 1: big Department of Education, Speaker 3: and they're Speaker 0: treating kids deserve to have a go away and fight for them. Speaker 1: This is a calling. Speaker 0: Children of this country deserve Speaker 3: that, Speaker 0: This is an economic institution. This is not Russia. Speaker 4: Let the camera see him. Let the camera see him. Speaker 1: What is Speaker 4: he? This this man is a contractor. Speaker 3: We are Speaker 1: members of congress. Speaker 3: Come in. They're blocking us. Speaker 4: You see this man here who is a federal employee, he told us. Speaker 3: No. He's not. Speaker 4: Are you a federal employee? Speaker 0: No. No. Speaker 4: He said he's a federal employee. We pay him. We raise money to make sure that we have a department of education. Everybody that's hired at the department of education are here because we pay for them to be here. He's standing here today blocking the door, and he can't give us a good reason why he's blocking this door. Speaker 1: Make sure they see right here all access entrance. Speaker 3: Well, I think it should be clear to parents in The United States. If you wanna advocate on behalf of your children, you are not allowed to come into this building where you pay taxes. Parents who have children who are disabled, access is being blocked. You voted. You voted for members of congress to to advocate on behalf of your children, children with disabilities, for young women who have been victims of sexual assault in our classrooms, on our school grounds. Members of OCR are fighting for your children. We are not not allowed in the building to talk to them. We are not allowed to advocate on behalf of America's children. America, we have a problem. Speaker 4: Everybody stand back. Alright. Speaker 2: So this is the Department of Education. You've got
Saved - February 8, 2025 at 9:35 AM

@GuntherEagleman - Gunther Eagleman™

BREAKING: Democrats are trying to storm the Department of Education! Maxine Waters and Maxwell Frost are trying to force their way past the guards. At one point, Waters asks the guards if they have firearms and if they will shoot them. Is this an insurrection? https://t.co/WBN9bxD1uF

Video Transcript AI Summary
Members of Congress are being denied entry to the Department of Education by a private security contractor. They express frustration, stating they are elected representatives trying to advocate for their constituents, including children with disabilities. The security personnel claim they are following orders, but Congress members argue that they should have access to the building to fulfill their oversight responsibilities. They highlight the lack of transparency and accountability, noting that while they are blocked, billionaires can enter freely. The situation escalates as they call for attention to the issue, emphasizing the importance of their role in advocating for the public, particularly for vulnerable families.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Right now, you're looking live at the Department of Education, members of Congress. They're being denied entry into the building. The doors are locked. There's a security guard there. I'm guessing that's who's in the brown, tan looking shirt, but we don't know for sure. They're having a tense conversation. Speaker 1: Doing our job. We're trying to say Speaker 0: Kinda wanna listen in for a second here. Speaker 1: Show him your ID. Were you told to stand here, or did you decide to stand here and block members of Congress from Edison? Access. Speaker 2: To the federal bill 19 Speaker 1: You said that you're out of my bedroom. Know. We're allowed in there. Speaker 2: So a private security contractor. Speaker 1: Do you do you Speaker 2: understand. A private security contractor is making the decision to block members of congress from asset from a public access entrance. I don't think he knows. You have the authority as a private security contractor to block members of congress. That that that has been knighted and granted to you. You have you have Speaker 1: you have to at least let us go to the desk. Speaker 3: Yeah. It's made a first month. Who told you to do this? Speaker 1: Open the door. I see you. So do you do you understand who numbers are trying to do? Speaker 3: We're we're we're we're we're Speaker 1: we're then. In charge of it. You don't care. We have a block in there. We're not dangerous people. We're not I don't know. Security, There are no thieves and thugs out here. We're members of congress. With identification. We're teachers. Speaker 3: Each is the bible Speaker 1: There's our ID. Hundred. Right there. Speaker 2: You were elected. Speaker 1: This is our job. I've never seen one. This is our job. We're doing our job. Speaker 3: Oh, wow. Speaker 1: You're securing this building against who? Members of Congress. Members of Congress. For all Speaker 2: you protecting me, it's members of the temple So this is the beginning of full transparency of this administration. That's right. The administration that talked about they're gonna open the doors to all of the these things that have and show the American public what is going on. They don't even open the door to this building, to members of congress. We are not posing any threat here. Now we are not dangerous people. We have not done anything. We're trying to request a meeting, and they won't they have a private security contractor who, on his own, is making decisions on behalf of the Department of Education. Speaker 1: We are not being able to work. Hayes at the office. They allow billionaires and his minions to come in to these buildings? Speaker 2: I don't know who he is, but I know who I am. And I'm a member of congress with oversight responsibilities trying to request a meeting, and a private security contractor is not allowing me to enter Speaker 1: the bill. They're all billionaires going on building, but not the people's representatives. Speaker 3: They're all billionaires Speaker 1: and their cronies, they're lying, but not there's a lack of transparency here. Members of congress, the people's representatives are not allowed in. This is not transparent. Speaker 2: They're locking our Speaker 3: kids up. Yeah. Speaker 1: Well, not only are they not letting us in, now they've called the Department of the Homeland Security. We are members of congress here at Speaker 3: the top Really? Speaker 2: The Department of Education, and they're treating Speaker 1: The kids deserve to have a way to fight for them. That's a calling. Children of this country deserve that battle. Speaker 3: This is a public institution. Speaker 1: This is not Russia. Speaker 3: Let the cameras see him. Let the cameras. Speaker 1: Who is he? This this man right here. We are members of congress. Come in. They're blocking us. Speaker 3: See this man here who is a federal employee, he told us. Speaker 1: No. He's not. Speaker 3: Are you a federal employee? Speaker 1: No. Not us. Speaker 3: No. He said he's a federal employee. We pay him. We raise money to make sure that we have a department of education. Everybody that's hired at the department of education are here because we pay for them to be here. He's standing here today blocking the door, and he can't give us a good reason why he's blocking this door. Speaker 1: Make sure they see right here all access entrance. Well, I think it should be clear to parents in The United States. If you wanna advocate on behalf of your children, you are not allowed to come into this building where you pay taxes. Parents who have children who are disabled, access is being blocked. You voted. You voted for members of congress to to advocate on behalf of your children, children with disabilities, for young women who have been victims of sexual assault in our classrooms, on our school grounds. Members of OCR are fighting for your children. We are not allowed in the building to talk to them. We are not allowed to advocate on behalf of America's children. America, we have a problem. Speaker 3: Now everybody stand back Speaker 1: and let Speaker 3: the cameras see. They're calling all of these gun loading people out on us. Speaker 2: Right here. Speaker 3: They're calling them out on us. Look look behind this door. Who do you see back there? The doors will open. Do they have guns on them? Yes. Do they have guns? Weapons. Yes. Are they prepared to shoot us? Yes. We want in. Door. How long it says on the door? Speaker 1: All it says is it. Said all in. All in. Government. Speaker 4: I'm a member of congress. I'm chair of the progressive caucus. I'm vice ranking member of the education committee, and the baseline responsibility of the congress is to oversee our federal agencies. Each and every one of us have been in this building and through these doors. But, of course, as soon as we get word that Elon Musk and Donald Trump wanna shut down the Department of Education, suddenly they don't wanna let members of congress in that ask questions. Musk and the Republicans, they say they're supposedly about saving us money, bringing transparency, seeing where the dollars really go. No. They're the ones that lock the doors and make sure that your elected representatives can't even ask questions. We can't ask questions. Speaker 3: That they're responsible for all of the student loans in this country? Speaker 4: They I hear that they wanna cut those student loans and give them Speaker 1: as tax cuts to their Speaker 3: billionaire friends. And are they aware of title one where mothers are getting up going to work for minimum wages, and they cannot afford the education that the billionaires have for their children. And we tried to help them by giving money to this kind of person here and the people who work here, including all of the people in this country and those title one families who need some help, both in urban areas and rural areas and mothers who can't even afford the childcare that they need for their children while they're taking these jobs, making minimum wages. And we're helping them with title one, and this man is blocking the door. He says he's a federal employee. He won't tell us who gave him permission to do this. All he knows is he's gonna stand here and tell the members of congress who are elected, who vote for the funding for all of them in this building and for the student loans and for the title one families. He's gonna tell us that we can't come in and talk with anybody. Speaker 1: Is that right? Does this remind you of Speaker 0: Alright. We are watching what is Speaker 1: an an epic seat. Speaker 0: We have members of congress
Saved - February 11, 2025 at 4:26 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I confronted Elizabeth Warren on her stance against DOGE and questioned her $12 million net worth from a $200K salary. Instead of answering, she reacted aggressively. It’s evident that politicians often evade real questions and rely on scripted responses. We must hold them accountable!

@nicksortor - Nick Sortor

🚨 #BREAKING: Elizabeth Warren just ASSAULTED me on camera for asking her WHY she’s so against DOGE & transparency Or maybe it was because I asked Pocahontas how she amassed a net worth of over $12 MILLION on a $200K government salary Either way, it’s clear these clowns are NOT able to answer questions. They’re only capable of spewing talking points fed to them by their handlers/lobbyist. HOLD THEM ACCOUNTABLE! We’re the media now.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Senator Warren, why the fear of transparency regarding Elon Musk's exposure of fraudulent spending? How did you accumulate a $12 million net worth on a congressional salary of $200,000? You keep trying to block my camera; this isn't a public sidewalk. You won't answer my questions. What's the problem with transparency, and why is Doge such a problem for you? You just elbowed me—I have it on camera. Transparency is your enemy.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The shutdown Senator Warren, why are you so afraid of transparency? Why are you bothered by the fact that Elon Musk is attempting to expose all of this fraudulent spending? What is that about? What is the problem here? What is the problem with transparent do not touch me. Do not touch me. Senator Warren, I just wanna answer your question. How did you get a $12,000,000 net worth on a $200,000 salary in congress? Thank you. How did you do that? Excuse me. How did you do that? You didn't keep trying to block my camera. We're not public sidewalk. So You know what the mean? What are you? What are you? I'm sorry. So you don't wanna answer that question. What is it about Doge that's such a problem to you? You just elbowed me, senator. I got that on camera. Us. Thank you. Transparency is your enemy.
Saved - February 11, 2025 at 4:44 AM

@libsoftiktok - Libs of TikTok

Holy shlit. Elizabeth Warren just elbowed a citizen journalist for asking why she’s opposed to cutting government wasteful spending

@nicksortor - Nick Sortor

🚨 #BREAKING: Elizabeth Warren just ASSAULTED me on camera for asking her WHY she’s so against DOGE & transparency Or maybe it was because I asked Pocahontas how she amassed a net worth of over $12 MILLION on a $200K government salary Either way, it’s clear these clowns are NOT able to answer questions. They’re only capable of spewing talking points fed to them by their handlers/lobbyist. HOLD THEM ACCOUNTABLE! We’re the media now.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Senator Warren, why the fear of transparency regarding Elon Musk's exposure of alleged fraudulent spending? How did you accumulate a $12 million net worth on a congressional salary of $200,000? I'm asking for transparency. You're obstructing my camera. Why the resistance? What's the issue with Dogecoin? You just elbowed me. Transparency is clearly your enemy.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The shutdown Senator Warren, why are you so afraid of transparency? Why are you bothered by the fact that Elon Musk is attempting to expose all of this fraudulent spending? What is that about? What is the problem here? What is the problem with transparent do not touch me. Do not touch me. Senator Warren, I just wanna answer your question. How did you get a $12,000,000 net worth on a $200,000 salary in congress? Thank you. How did you do that? Excuse me. How did you do that? You didn't keep trying to block my camera. We're not public sidewalk. So You know what the mean? What are you? What are you? I'm sorry. So you don't wanna answer that question. What is it about Doge that's such a problem to you? You just elbowed me, senator. I got that on camera. Us. Thank you. Transparency is your enemy.
Saved - February 11, 2025 at 4:44 AM

@nicksortor - Nick Sortor

🚨 LMAO! President Trump just absolutely TORCHED Elizabeth Warren, aka Pocahontas “She’s a fake—just like she said she was an Indian. You have more Indian blood than she does… She’s a nasty woman. She’s a really nasty woman. Despite her phony beer commercial.” What a LEGEND 🤣 https://t.co/mbwm2xvRrU

Video Transcript AI Summary
Freezing the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) essentially gives big corporations a free pass. Elizabeth Warren, in creating the CFPB, used it to harm many good people. She's a phony; her claims of Native American heritage are false, and she leveraged those claims for personal gain and to destroy others. The CFPB was badly run, a waste of resources, and its elimination is part of our efforts to reduce waste, fraud, and abuse. It was a vicious agency that caused significant harm. Our goal is its complete removal.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Regarding Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, Democrats including Elizabeth Warren have said that by freezing it, it's getting big banks and giant corporations the green light Speaker 1: to see Yeah. Pocahontas. Pocahontas is the fake the faker. You know, that was set up to destroy people. She used that as her little, personal agency to go around and destroy people. And she's a fake. Just like she said she was an Indian, and she wasn't an Indian. You have more Indian blood in you than she has. She went to college based on the fact that she was an Indian. She got jobs based on the fact that she was an Indian. She's a fake. That was, that was set up to destroy some very good people. And, and it worked. I mean, it worked a lot of a lot of great people. I I tell you, before I ever heard the term, people would come up to me in the Midwest in areas that say, sir, I'm being destroyed by them. They they use that to destroy people. She's a nasty woman. She's a really nasty woman despite her phony beer commercial. Now, we did the right thing. That was a very important thing to get rid of. Can you confirm it? And it was also a waste. I mean, number one, it was a bad group of people running it, but, it was also a waste. If you looked at when she really ran it, wow, that was a vicious group of people. They really destroyed a lot of people. Speaker 0: And you confirm it's, your goal is to have it totally eliminated the agency? Speaker 1: Yeah. Because we're we're trying to get rid of waste, fraud, and abuse.

@nicksortor - Nick Sortor

🚨 #BREAKING: Elizabeth Warren just ASSAULTED me on camera for asking her WHY she’s so against DOGE & transparency Or maybe it was because I asked Pocahontas how she amassed a net worth of over $12 MILLION on a $200K government salary Either way, it’s clear these clowns are NOT able to answer questions. They’re only capable of spewing talking points fed to them by their handlers/lobbyist. HOLD THEM ACCOUNTABLE! We’re the media now.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Senator Warren, why the fear of transparency regarding Elon Musk's exposure of alleged fraudulent spending? How did you amass a $12 million net worth on a congressional salary of $200,000? You're obstructing my camera; this isn't a public sidewalk. Your unwillingness to answer suggests transparency is your enemy. What's the issue with Dogecoin? You just elbowed me. This is all on camera.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The shutdown Senator Warren, why are you so afraid of transparency? Why are you bothered by the fact that Elon Musk is attempting to expose all of this fraudulent spending? What is that about? What is the problem here? What is the problem with transparent do not touch me. Do not touch me. Senator Warren, I just wanna answer your question. How did you get a $12,000,000 net worth on a $200,000 salary in congress? Thank you. How did you do that? Excuse me. How did you do that? You didn't keep trying to block my camera. We're not public sidewalk. So You know what the mean? What are you? What are you? I'm sorry. So you don't wanna answer that question. What is it about Doge that's such a problem to you? You just elbowed me, senator. I got that on camera. Us. Thank you. Transparency is your enemy.
Saved - February 11, 2025 at 1:32 AM

@libsoftiktok - Libs of TikTok

Rep Maxine Waters is currently have an unhinged meltdown over Elon Musk: “Elon Musk, where are you?! Bring your ass over here! We're not afraid of you... He's a thief! He's a gangster!" https://t.co/57DAh3YiEQ

Video Transcript AI Summary
Wow! Look at this crowd! We're at the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, a crucial agency created by Dodd-Frank reforms. Before this, consumers had nowhere to turn when big banks cheated them, especially regarding student loans. Elon Musk wants to dismantle this—why? Because he’s a thief, a gangster, and he and his billionaire buddies want to take over the country. Trump even said you can buy your way into power.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Wow. Wow. Wow. Look at this crowd. Elon Musk, where are you? Bring your ass over here so you can see who's here and what we're doing. We're not afraid of you. We know that you are the co president now of The United States Of America. But ladies and gentlemen, I want you to follow very closely what he's doing and how he has done it. First of all, we're here at the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. What is it? This is so important. Prior to this being, organized in the Dodd Frank reforms, consumers didn't have any place to really file complaints. They didn't have anywhere to go when the biggest banks in America was ripping them off. The student loans were being undermined. They didn't have any place to go. Why does Elon Musk wanna get rid of all of this? Because he's a thief. He's a gangster. He brings his billionaire friends along with him because they think that they can take over this country. And Trump has said, you give me enough money, you can have
Saved - February 12, 2025 at 1:02 AM

@bennyjohnson - Benny Johnson

🚨BREAKING: Journalist Nick Sortor is contacting DC District Attorney Ed Martin to file assault charges against Maxine Waters and Elizabeth Warren: “I’m doing that right after this. I was taking punches and pushes. I was simply trying to get answers. No aggression.” https://t.co/DVJaKxm8RP

Video Transcript AI Summary
We're simply turning the tables by asking legitimate questions, like how did these members of Congress get so rich? I think someone has to file charges for assault against these Democrat members and their staff. I'm going to reach out to the DC District Attorney to see what his jurisdiction is. This shouldn't be tolerated. I have a right protected under the First Amendment to simply ask questions. I wasn't being violent. I'm simply trying to get an answer to a question. The only aggression there is is asking aggressive questions that they don't like. I asked Ayanna Presley if she condoned FEMA sending $59 million to house illegals in New York City while people in Western North Carolina have been living in tents for the past four months, and I got the death stare of a lifetime. I'm going to live here in DC, and I'm going to do this on a routine basis.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is nothing compared to what Republicans have to deal with every single day on Capitol Hill. So Republicans, members of Congress, are constantly barraged by reporters who chase them into elevators, who harass them, who are funded by USAID in order to make their lives a living hell. And all you're doing is turning the tables and simply asking legitimate questions. This is a huge question. How did they all get so rich? Massie Waters was named the most corrupt member of Congress. Elizabeth Warren is worth tens of millions of dollars. Nobody can figure out exactly why. So it seems completely and totally legitimate, yet you're assaulted for this. There's new sheriff in town, Nick. Ed Martin is the new DC District Attorney appointed by president Trump. Have you considered reaching out to potentially file charges for assault against these Democrat members and their staff? Speaker 1: No. I I think somebody definitely has to, but the the the issue that we have here is that I would have to go, as far as I'm aware, to the DC District Attorney. The the the district of, you know, the city of Washington, DC would have to be the ones to bring assault charges against these people, and the chances I mean, there's not a snowball's chance in hell that would ever happen. I mean, there's a there's a clear double standard here in Washington, DC. But, you know, Ed Martin's a good guy, man. Just reach out. We'll just see. We'll see what his is. Well, it happened Speaker 0: you know, the way that it works is is his jurisdiction because it happened on federal property, and this is how they were able the DC District Attorney can charge anything that happens in Washington, DC. You were in Washington, DC. And Speaker 1: Beautiful. That's what I'll do right after this then. Well, there we go. We're getting places here on the Benny Show, man. Speaker 0: Don't take legal yeah. Don't take legal advice, but, but I I'm I'm telling you is that that this shouldn't be this shouldn't be tolerated. You have a right. You have a right protected under the first amendment to simply ask questions. And you weren't being violent. Right? You weren't pushing or or or you weren't pushing or fighting anyone or punching anyone? They were punching No. Speaker 1: I was the one taking the punches and taking the pushes. That that's that that was me. I wasn't blocking anybody. I wasn't, you know, I'm not I'm not I I'm not getting in their paths. I'm, you know, simply trying to get an answer to a question. There's no aggression. The only aggression there is is is asking aggressive questions that they don't like. Yeah. Sure. It it's as simple as that. You know, Ayanna Presley, you you're talking about the FEMA situation. I asked her directly in the video that I'm about to post. I asked her if she condoned FEMA sending 25,000,000 or or I'm sorry, $59,000,000 to house illegals in New York City while people in Western North Carolina have been living in tents for the past four months, and I got the death stare of a lifetime. It was like a ghetto death stare, Benny. You're gonna see. I mean, I I've never gotten that look from a congressperson before, but it's like a look of intimidation because, you know, they think that they think they're gods. These Democrat congresspeople think they are god, that they're untouchable, and that nothing will ever happen to them. And, you know, I'm I'm here in DC now. I'm gonna live here in DC, and I'm gonna do this on a routine basis. So Good. They should be ready for it. Maybe I'll have to wear a mask like their, their masked minions so that they can't recognize me.
Saved - March 4, 2025 at 11:20 PM

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

Stole a million dollars of taxpayer money? 🤔

@nicksortor - Nick Sortor

🚨 #BREAKING EXCLUSIVE: I asked Maxine Waters if the reason she’s so against DOGE is because she was caught funneling over $1 MILLION in regulated funds to her daughter But because her goon squad recognized me, they immediately surrounded her and shoved me into the side of her limo… again. I also attempted to ask her why she’s so against change the VAST majority of Americans voted for. Sounds like her attempts to block transparency is a “threat to our Democracy,” as the Democrats say.

Video Transcript AI Summary
I can't believe you funneled over $1,000,000 in campaign funds to your daughters! Is that why you're worried about Doge? Get your ass away from me! I wouldn't even touch you. I'll press charges! I'm not charging at you. But I feel like that's a pretty fair question, why are you so worried about Doge? You're pushing me! Pushing Doge has a very high approval rating amongst the American people. What an asshole. So what? You don't wanna, you don't like the will of the people?
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Maxine, you funneled over $1,000,000 in campaign funds to your daughters. Is that why you're worried about your nose? Your ass away, young man. Yeah. Yeah. I wouldn't wouldn't touch her. I'll press charges. I'm not charged on you. But but I'm just I feel like that's a pretty fair question. Why are you so worried about Doge? You're pushing me. You're pushing me. You're pushing me. Pushing Doge has a very high approval rating amongst the American people. What an asshole. So what? You don't wanna you don't like the will of the blast off.
Saved - March 25, 2025 at 8:18 PM

@TimRunsHisMouth - Tim Young

Jasmine Crockett assaulted a journalist. Charges need to be brought against her. Enough of this trash!

@LauraLoomer - Laura Loomer

🚨EXCLUSIVE VIDEO🚨 Democrat Congresswoman @RepJasmine Jasmine Crockett just physically attacked and assaulted @LoomerUnleashed DC Correspondent @TheCharlesDowns, attempting to violently steal his phone out of his hand after he asked her if she would condemn the violence at @Tesla showrooms that she herself called for on a @Tesla Takedown call to action 5 days ago with violent Democrat activists. Charles told me Jasmine’s long finger nails scratched his hand, leaving a red mark and indentations from her nails on the top of his hand. (See clip below)👇🏻 It’s clear elected Democrats have embraced violence against Trump supporters and members of the independent media, even in the halls of Congress. @SpeakerJohnson MUST CENSURE Jasmine Crockett immediately for her incitement of violence and her actual violence in the halls of Congress.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Congresswoman Crockett is asked about a "Tesla takedown call" where she allegedly called for violence on the 29th. The interviewer asks her to clarify her comments. The interviewer then asks if Congresswoman Crockett will condemn violence.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Bar, shoveling horseman Speaker 1: Hello, congresswoman. Horseman's word. Speaker 0: Well, that sounds like fun. Yeah. Well Speaker 1: Wait. Congresswoman Crockett. That. Speaker 0: But it sounds Speaker 1: Congresswoman Crockett, you're recently on a Tesla takedown call calling for violence on the twenty ninth. Speaker 0: To be here. Right? Speaker 1: Would you like to clarify your comments? Speaker 0: As you can see Speaker 1: Congress, will will you condone by will you condemn violence at the test?

@LauraLoomer - Laura Loomer

EXCLUSIVE VIDEO: Tonight, Radical Democrat Congresswoman @JasmineForUS Jasmine Crockett spoke on a CALL TO ACTION call organized by the @Tesla Takedown organizers who have been vandalizing and attacking @elonmusk’s Tesla Showrooms and charging stations across the country and all

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker states they are present for selfish reasons, specifically wanting Elon Musk to be "taken down" on their birthday, March 29th.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'll make sure that I keep it short, but I am truly here for very selfish reasons. Starting with on March 29, it's my birthday. And all I want to see happen on my birthday is for Elon to be taken down. Yes.
Saved - March 30, 2025 at 1:30 AM

@govt_corrupt - govt.exe is corrupt

Catherine McKenna blocked me for asking if she found the BILLIONS misplaced under her watch. When an independent journalist confronted her today, he was assaulted and ejected. This is how govt treats questioners, yet they harass you for being $2.00 short on your taxes. https://t.co/Vs4tOdtJMQ

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 states this is the most important election in most of their lifetimes. They claim Trump has made unacceptable threats against the economy, workers, and sovereignty. They believe a particular leader can address these issues and needs support. Speaker 1 accuses Catherine McKenna of losing track of 20,000 contracts worth $236,000,000,000, which they claim is why she is no longer in parliament. Speaker 1 repeats the accusation and insults Speaker 0. Speaker 1 continues to harass Catherine, repeating the $236,000,000,000 figure and using abusive language. Speaker 1 then states that everyone is "fucking retarded."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Just wanna tell you, this is the most important election in most of our lifetimes. Speaker 1: The threats that Trump has Speaker 0: made against our economy, against our workers, but against our sovereignty are completely unacceptable. We need to stand up to them, and we need to stand strong like Canadians are doing. I've been in our attorney for a long time. Our kids actually grew up together. He is the leader to get this done, so we need to support him. Speaker 1: Catherine, didn't you lose track of 20,000 contracts? $236,000,000,000. Speaker 0: So listen, guys. 2 things I would Speaker 1: That's actually accurate. That's why you're not in parliament any longer. Speaker 0: You know what? We're actually trying to have an Speaker 1: Didn't you lose track of 20,000 contracts? Speaker 0: No. I just Speaker 1: Yes. You did. $236,000,000,000. 2 hundred go fuck yourself. 236,000,000,000 dolls. I should talk to McAfee. Jimmy Lures, twenty thousand contracts. $236,000,000,000. I'm to see Speaker 0: I'm Speaker 1: here you. Go fuck yourself. Speaker 0: Buddy. Spencer, Speaker 1: nice to meet you. Buddy. Hey, Catherine McKenna. What do you have to say to that? What do you have to say for that, Catherine? Speaker 0: Body. Body. Word. Speaker 1: What do you have to say for yourself, Catherine? Yeah. Fucking nothing. That's what? Body. That's what? Don't touch me. Idiot. No. No. Place Speaker 0: me. $236,000,000,000, Speaker 1: Catherine. Speaker 0: Come on. You're disrupting this. Speaker 1: No shit. $236,000,000,000, Catherine. How much did you lose track of, Catherine? This is private property. Do you own it? You guys are all fucking retarded. Everyone, you're all fucking retarded. No shit, stupid.
Saved - April 13, 2025 at 10:24 PM

@LauraLoomer - Laura Loomer

WATCH: @LoomerUnleashed @TheCharlesDowns just confronted Democrat Congresswoman Jasmine Crockett @RepJasmine and asked her why she’s running around with tax payer funded security when she’s the violent person who goes around physically attacking independent journalists. https://t.co/WTPS3tAdo1

Video Transcript AI Summary
Congresswoman Crockett is questioned about using taxpayer-funded private security. The questioner claims Crockett initiated physical contact and asks for an apology. Crockett does not respond or apologize.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Congresswoman Crockett, why are you running around with taxpayer funded private security when you're the one who hit me first? Would you like to apologize for your actions, congresswoman? You don't wanna apologize, congresswoman?
Saved - May 10, 2025 at 7:54 PM

@RNCResearch - RNC Research

🚨BODYCAM FOOTAGE RELEASED: "Get your F****** officers." "You don't dare talk to a Congresswoman like that." "You will pay." Why does Democrat @LamonicaMciver think she's above the law? https://t.co/esibyAXvZp

Saved - June 13, 2025 at 2:05 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I confronted Democrat Rep. Jamie Raskin about his support for Kilmar Abrego Garcia, who was revealed to be trafficking humans to Maryland. Instead of addressing my question, he called me “FASCIST” and “Q ANON” while trying to leave. He even signaled for Capitol Police to intervene shortly after backing Alex Padilla for interrupting Kristi Noem’s press conference. Raskin avoided my questions, resorting to incoherent shouting and mentioning Elon Musk. I hope he finds some help.

@nicksortor - Nick Sortor

🚨 EXCLUSIVE: I confronted Democrat Rep. Jamie Raskin over his support for illegals and he absolutely MELTED DOWN 🤣 He called me “FASCIST” and “Q ANON” as he tried to run away 😂 All I asked is if he still backed Kilmar Abrego Garcia after it was revealed he was TRAFFlCKING HUMANS to Maryland, the state Raskin represents. He even tried to signal for Capitol Police to come get me, MINUTES AFTER he back Alex Padilla for crashing Kristi Noem’s presser. A liar and a hypocrite too. And of course, instead of answering the questions, he yelled incoherent blather and found a way to bring up @elonmusk I hope you get some help, @RepRaskin

Video Transcript AI Summary
A man confronts a congressman, questioning his prior support for Kilmar Braco Garcia, who has been charged with facilitating the transport of illegal immigrants. He asks if the congressman still supports Garcia and whether he believes Garcia is entitled to due process, given his alleged illegal status. The man repeatedly asks if Garcia entered the country legally and accuses the congressman of being made a fool. He references accusations that Garcia beat his wife and questions whether the congressman supports "illegal gangbangers" in Maryland. He asks the congressman to condemn human smuggling and accuses him of being a "fascist." He questions whether the congressman believes in due process and demands to know how Garcia was allowed into the United States. He asks if the congressman is retracting his support for Garcia. The man then asks if the congressman supports deporting criminal illegal immigrants, referencing Elon Musk. He presses the congressman on whether he supports removing criminal illegal immigrants from the country.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm getting out of my face, you little fascist. Get out of my face. Hey. Hey, congressman. Quick question for you. So you initially Hi. My name is Nick. Nick, to meet you. I'm from X. I'm from X. So I have to ask you. Wait. I'm You said Kilmer Braco Garcia. You're gonna excuse me. Voiced a lot of support for him originally. Now he's been charged with facilitating the transport Go back to your illegals. Are you still gonna double down on that? So he gets due process now? You even due process I don't think he wait. Was he supposed to be here to begin with? Was he illegal? Was he illegally in process? How did Kilmar Obraco or Trump get allowed him to be here? How did how did he get here originally? What, judge? Did he come here legally? Your girlfriend he come here legally? Get back to your job, man. So you can't answer the question. Yeah. No. We can't. But you seem a little angry about it. Is that why? Is it because you you were made to be a fool out over it? I mean, you were supporting a man whose wife accused him of beating her. Trump's You've gotta be him to be in the country. Did you know that? He's not a Trump's judge allowed him to in the country. He was he was allowed in the country? And then what? And then what happened? And then what happened? Then he was deported back to his home country. You keep calling him the Maryland father who apparently beats his wife, which she said on the record that he beats her. Go back to the QAnon meeting. It is it okay with you? Is it okay with you? QAnon is calling you. Go back to illegal smuggling other illegals illegals through the country? Is that what the people of Maryland want? To QAnon. The people of Maryland? You think they want illegal gangbangers? Bringing Mars, man. Go back to wherever you think you're from. Alright? Okay. Human smuggling yes or no? Human smuggling yes or no? Face, you little fascist. Get out of my face. I'm not guessing who you are. Alright. Well, okay. We'll go to let's go let's go to Padilla then. Fascist. Okay. What about Padilla? Are you what he did earlier was okay going in and interrupting a press conference? Was he a fascist too? Yeah. A I understand why you're so angry about this because you look like a freaking fool now. You look ridiculous. Get the hell out of my I'm not in your face, bro. You're a little fascist. You got your little minions pushing me back. So come on. There's something wrong with you. I mean, these aren't very difficult is calling you to get back to Cuba. Condemn the transport of illegals throughout the country. Do you condemn it? Do you think that people should be smuggling other illegals? Get back to you, come trust your kids. Okay. So you have no answer. That seems like a pretty Get back. No. I'm ninety ten issues, Congressman. Do you believe in due process or no? Do you get to do process Do you believe in due process or not? No. You answer me one question. What was the process that he used to get in The United States? Illegal? You did did he come into the country legally? One yes or no question. Do you believe in due process or not? Yes or no? I do. Now that you believe that so you're not gonna answer my questions. I answered yours. 50 of your stupid people. Didn't didn't answer a single one. Do you do you are you taking back your support from Kilmar and Braco Garcia? The judge kept him in the country. Okay. So you're You know, you have to Okay. So you're not you're not I'm gonna post the whole thing unedited. Watch. Watch. You'll see. Trust me. You'll see. Okay. So I'll give you one more chance. Do you take back your support for an illegal alien who was in the country? An illegal alien. What are talking about? What's the Calling him the the calling him the Maryland man? Calling him your calling him a constituent? Are you serious? He's not my constituent. Of course he's not because he's illegal. You're you're a moron. Okay? As well as a fascist. Go back your These talking points were fabulous. There's a reason the democrat parties there's a reason that your approval rating is in the single digits. Your approval rating is negative three points. Oh, you got me, bro. You got me. Go get Yeah. Did get You got me. Okay. I did get you. Okay. So, Matt, go ahead. Are you okay with the the deportation? Do you think Marylanders want illegals coming into their state? Violent criminal gangbangers? You're seriously a moron. You know that. Right? You can't answer. That's a pretty decent question. That's a layup. No. Donald Trump's judge kept him in our state. Go look it up, Is he the only illegal in Maryland? Is he the only criminal illegal in Maryland? Okay. So you're saying Well, I don't know. Is Elon Musk at all here? Elon Musk is saying that everybody else Do you think Elon Musk should have been deported? He was illegal No. He wasn't. Wait. Yes. He was. So all these Oh, he wasn't? All these other illegals in Maryland. All these other criminals in Maryland. Are you okay? Okay. Let's let's do easy one. Do support deporting criminal illegals at least? Arf, what are you talking about? Are you gonna stick the police after me because I'm asking you a question? You've gotta be kidding me. Don't try that. They just have to be really wrong with you, man. Stupid. No. No. I'm just asking you. I'm just I don't like the the American people wanna know. Do you support Oh, you're have ever been elected in public office? Do you What office were you elected to? Do you to American people? What office were you elected to? I'm not the one here to answer that Do you to people? I do. I speak to over a million people. Oh, wow. So yeah. Yeah. Bro. Okay. So man. So okay. Okay. So do you support removing criminal illegals from the country? Let's say that. It's good deal. Elon Muskie. Yes. I do. Do you support Okay. Alright. So so the answer is no. Right? Yours. No.
Saved - July 3, 2025 at 3:59 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I confronted Maxine Waters about her statements encouraging violence against ICE agents. During our exchange, she attempted to have someone call Capitol Police, but they supported me instead. One of her supporters chased me down and had a meltdown. Maxine tried to evade accountability by taking photos with her supporters, but I pressed her on key issues. She refused to condemn illegal immigrants receiving taxpayer-funded healthcare, rioters in Los Angeles, and assaults on ICE agents. It's frustrating that she can't answer these straightforward questions. Why do we pay her salary?

@nicksortor - Nick Sortor

🚨 BREAKING: I just confronted Maxine Waters about the LIES she’s spewing, and how she’s ENCOURAGING vioIence against ICE agents She then tried to have one of her goons call Capitol Police, but they sided with me 🤣 So the goon CHASED ME and MELTED DOWN. They can’t help themselves 😂 Ole Maxine tried to evade me by taking pictures with astroturfed supporters. Didn’t work. But here’s the rundown: ❌ She REFUSED to condemn illegals getting taxpayer funded healthcare ❌ She REFUSED to condemn rioters burning down Los Angeles ❌ She REFUSED to condemn assauIts on ICE agents These are SIMPLE QUESTIONS that she can’t even answer. Why the hell do we pay these people’s salaries anymore??!

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 1 questions a congresswoman about taxpayer-funded healthcare for undocumented immigrants and condemns violent riots in Los Angeles. Speaker 0 does not answer. Speaker 0 then challenges others to harass him as they allegedly harassed the congresswoman. Speaker 1 asks Speaker 0 to condemn the violent riots in Los Angeles. Speaker 0 declines to answer and asks who Speaker 1 is. Speaker 1 attempts to continue the conversation, but Speaker 0 walks away. Speaker 1 then asks Speaker 0 if he has a foreskin.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Harass me. Harass me. Dude, you tried to get the police on me. Between me. I just Speaker 1: have to ask you. It seems like you're you're advocating for millions of illegals to be paid their their health could be paid for by tax payers. Is that is that wrong? Because your constituents are having to pay for the health insurance of millions illegals brought in by Joe Biden. Do do you condemn that? Is that not a problem? No? Come on. It's a pretty easy question. You can you can you can you can condemn it. You can say, yes. I do support it. I mean, your your Officer. Your lack of an answer oh, yeah. Call the police on me for asking a a a congresswoman a question. That's exactly what you're doing. That's fine. No. It's okay. So so, I mean, can I can I get a quick answer to that question? Quick answer to that question. Do you support illegals getting taxpayer funded health care? Speaker 0: You're my hero. It's incredible. We pay Speaker 1: these salaries. Speaker 0: We pay the payers pay the salaries, and we can't even get an answer to the question. We're not gonna stay in the room. Speaker 1: Say thank you. Thank you. You tried. You tried. But it's not it's not gonna work. I'm gonna continue to ask questions, bud. Speaker 0: In 4. Speaker 1: We need 4. We Speaker 0: need 4. Dude, you tried to call the police. What are you talking about? Just this Speaker 1: is a yaw. It didn't work. Alright. Let's make the let's do a little bit of an easier one here at this point. How about condemning the violent riots in Los Angeles? Are you willing to do that at least? I mean I mean, come on. Speaker 0: We're we're we're we're we're talking about people that were Speaker 1: setting buildings and cars on fire, assaulting ICE agents. Speaker 0: We're trying to I want you to back up. Can we do that? I want you don't don't don't say anything. Speaker 1: Alright. Condemn yeah. Don't say anything. Don't say anything. You're right. That's probably not a good idea. Speaker 0: Getting the flow. Speaker 1: Okay. Alright. So alright. So not gonna condemn not gonna condemn the violent riots in Los Angeles. This is this is amazing. This is the Democrat party. Speaker 0: You know what? Don't impede the flow. I just harassed that lady. And all these Christian people here, now harass me the same way you just want. We can disagree, but harass me. Harass me. Dude, you tried to get the police on between me and you, Harriet. I ain't afraid of you. So harass me the way you just had harass that lady. And your brother there that's laughing about it? Harass me. No. No. No. No. No. Bro, you know me. Coming down. Harass me. I dare you. Harass me the way you just harassed her. You're the one that just chased me down bro. Harass me. You'll be okay. You'll be okay. Be okay. You walking away. You keep walking with me. Speaker 1: Are you on to? Delays. Speaker 0: Harass me. Talking about? Just harassed that lady. How about you what are you even talking about? Question you want. Just I don't know who you are. Why the fuck am I gonna talk to you? Who are you? The the way you harass me. Who are you? Harass me the way you Are you going to tell me who you are, Speaker 1: or you just gonna stand here and Speaker 0: hang on. Okay. So we're Speaker 1: not Alright. So this is going nowhere. Speaker 0: I'll harass Speaker 1: to keep walking with me if you want to. Speaker 0: Alright. Okay. Well, you just ran Speaker 1: from all the way over there. So assuming you Speaker 0: you you you want me to see you leaving. Leaving. Okay. Are you gonna say anything productive? Speaker 1: See who you are. Speaker 0: So you're not gonna tell me who you are. I see you leave. Speaker 1: Come with me. You just support channel Come with me, dude. You just ran, like, a 100 yards to come get me. Speaker 0: Like, you can you can keep walking if you want to. Speaker 1: You got no foreskin. I'm just waiting Do you have a foreskin, man? Wait. Wait.
Saved - September 11, 2025 at 8:12 PM

@camhigby - Cam Higby 🇺🇸

Tonight I was attacked at a vigil for Charlie Kirk. I filmed two leftists shouting about Charlie. They stole my phone, punched me in the face and destroyed my meta glasses. https://t.co/ZDpcxRn72o

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: Occupiers, settlers, colonizers. Occupiers, statues. Yeah. And FBI I want them both. They both punch me in the face. Yeah. We're gonna make sure we get that face for facial recognition. Speaker 0: Occupiers, settlers, colonizers. Occupiers, statues. Yeah. And FBI I want them both. They both punch me in the face. Yeah. We're gonna make sure we get that face for facial recognition. Speaker 0: Occupiers, settlers, colonizers. Occupiers, statues. Yeah. And FBI I want them both. They both punch me in the face. Yeah. We're gonna make sure we get that face for facial recognition. Speaker 0: Occupiers, settlers, colonizers. Occupiers, statues. Yeah. And FBI I want them both. They both punch me in the face. Yeah. We're gonna make sure we get that face for facial recognition.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Occupiers, settlers, colonizers. Occupiers, statues. Yeah. And FBI I want them both. They both punch me in the face. They both punch me in the face. Yeah. We're gonna make sure we get that face for facial recognition.
Saved - April 18, 2026 at 7:46 PM

@nicksortor - Nick Sortor

🚨 WOW! Nick Shirley went confronted California’s House Speaker to her FACE over the Stop Nick Shirley Act And of course, she RAN AWAY! @nickshirleyy: “These people won’t even answer the questions!” The corruption is INSANE. https://t.co/8T8YqHt34J

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 raises concerns about AB 26-24, asserting it is a direct violation of the First Amendment and would hinder exposing fraud, including cases involving immigrants. They claim the bill would hinder investigations and public-interest reporting. Speaker 1 responds that legislative counsel checks the constitutionality of all bills and notes the speaker works on fraud issues, citing prior work on the budget subcommittee. They say Mia Bonta is involved through her role in pushing the bill, and remind that investigations into fraud are long-standing and handled by the attorney general. Speaker 0 alleges that Mia Bonta, who is described as the wife of the California attorney general, pushed the bill that would impede exposing fraud, and notes the bill would make it illegal for someone to go after fraud, particularly referencing immigrants and Armenians in California. They contend the bill is an assault on First Amendment rights. Speaker 1 counters that the claim is a misinterpretation of the bill and reiterates that constitutionality is reviewed with counsel. They maintain that the attorney general handles fraud investigations, framing the issue as ongoing and within established procedures. Speaker 0 asserts that the bill’s effect would be to criminalize publication of images recorded in public, and asks whether the government has the right to punish journalists for filming in public space. Speaker 1 again says this interpretation is incorrect, labeling it a misinterpretation of the legislation. They emphasize that the bill’s purpose is examined by ledge counsel and lawyers, and maintain that the First Amendment is a central consideration in their work. Speaker Rivas interjects and asks for their position on the Stop Nick Shirley Act AB 26-24, but Speaker 1 says they do not know anything about it. Speaker 0 reiterates concerns about potential conflicts of interest, suggesting there is clear evidence of a relationship between Mia Bonta and her husband, the attorney general, and states that these people won’t answer questions.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The bill a b twenty six twenty four, why would you sign off on that? It's a direct violation of the first amendment, and it makes it harder for people to expose fraud here. Speaker 1: We have ledge counsel. They check the constitutionality of all our bills since we're writing them. I work on fraud issues. You'd know that if you, look at some of the work I did on the budget subcommittee. Speaker 0: So that Mia Bonta, her husband's attorney general of the of the attorney general of California, and it was only until I exposed fraud that they actually cracked down on the fraud and made some arrest here especially with the hospices. And do you know that if this bill were to pass, it make it illegal for someone to go after fraud especially if it's based off of immigrants, for instance, Armenians in California. Speaker 1: No. No. I I think that that's a misinterpretation of the bill, but I'm happy to talk with you more about it. And I you were investigations into fraud or something that's been happening for a very long time. The attorney general handles those cases. This is an Speaker 0: ongoing issue. The wife of the attorney general, Mia Bonta, is now pushing this bill that literally goes against the First Amendment. Speaker 1: No. I I actually don't, I don't think that this bill violates the First Amendment. Mean, that's the that's the whole purpose. We have ledge counsel and ledge attorneys that talk with us about this. Constitutionality is really important to the work Speaker 0: So your bill criminalizes publication of images recorded in public. Do you believe the government has the right to punish journalists for filming in public space? Speaker 1: That no. I I think that that is a complete misinterpretation of actually the Speaker 0: No. Because it Speaker 1: piece of legislation. Speaker 0: It it that is not. That's literally what happened. Speaker Rivas, how are you doing? What do you think about the Stop Nick Shirley Act a b twenty six twenty four? Speaker 1: I don't know anything about it. Speaker 0: And do think there's any conflict of interest there with Mia Bonta and her husband being the AG? That just shows you everything you need to know. These people won't even answer the questions.
View Full Interactive Feed