reSee.it - Related Post Feed
reSee.it AI Summary
There are concerns that mRNA vaccines may be added to our food supply. Missouri HB 1169 is a labeling bill that seeks to counter this effort. If passed, it would require gene therapy products to be labeled as such. Lobbyists for cattle and pork associations have confirmed they will use mRNA vaccines in animals. Supporting HB 1169 is our only chance to prevent this. Learn more and vote YES.
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
Avoiding the Shot Isn't Enough: They Now Want to "Vaccinate" Us Through the Food Supply "Gates, the WHO, a ton of these universities: they're all talking about including mRNA vaccinations as part of the food. They're gonna modify the genes of these foods to make them mRNA vaccines," warned attorney @TomRenz. Missouri HB 1169 seeks to counter such an effort. It's been described as "one of the most controversial bills in history," but all it is – is a labeling bill. If a food product is a gene therapy product, you have every right to know. So, if this bill gets passed, it's a major victory not just for our well-being — but also for discovery, too.
Video Transcript AI Summary
This bill aims to ensure transparency and informed consent regarding gene therapy products and other medical interventions. It requires products potentially acting as gene therapy to be labeled accordingly, and information about potential exposure and shedding to be disclosed. The bill also emphasizes the importance of fully informed consent, including awareness of benefits, risks, and side effects. However, lobbyists, including those representing big pharma and agribusiness, are opposing the bill. The speaker urges support for the bill and criticizes those who oppose transparency and consumer knowledge. The bill's passage would reveal important information about adverse events and the use of gene therapy and mRNA vaccines in food.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This bill does 3 things, right? And I'm gonna read this. Okay? This is a quote from the bill. Any product that has been created to act as or expose to processes that could result in the product potentially acting as a gene therapy or that could otherwise possibly impact, alter or introduce genetic material or genetic change into the user of the product, individuals exposed to the product or individuals exposed to others who have used the product shall be conspicuously labeled with the words potential gene therapy product unless the product is known to be a gene therapy product, reasonable steps shall be taken to ensure the potential purchaser, the user of the product, is made aware of the presence of the label.
If the product is known to be a gene therapy product the product shall be labeled conspicuously with the words gene therapy product. Okay. What does this mean? All this means folks is that if there's gene therapy products, you get to know about it. It's a it's a labeling bill.
It doesn't do anything. We don't say you can't do it. We don't say there's an issue with it. We just say, hey, you got to make sure that consumers know if you're going to screw up their jeans. Sounds pretty simple, right?
Pretty simple. Now I want you to remember that because I'm gonna come back to it in a second. I'm gonna tell you the other 2 parts of the bill. There's 2 other parts. I'm gonna read this to you because I don't want it to be misconstrued.
The other side is lying about this bill, and I want you to hear it. And I want this bill sponsored in every state. You need to take this fill to your legislature in every republican state and ask them to sponsor it. We're gonna be talking about how and why. Okay.
Part 2. Upon written request of any resident of this state, any entity that produces, sells, or distributes a product in this state with the capacity to infect an individual with a disease or to expose that individual to a genetically modified material, including but not limited to vaccines, gene therapies, drugs, and medical interventions, shall provide any and all information related to the ways in which individuals who did not directly obtain or use the product may be exposed to the product or component of the product. Right? What this means, and there's more, it goes on a little bit, but what it means is shedding has to be disclosed, and how shedding works has to be disclosed. And that makes sense because if it's a gene therapy product and it can spread, we have the right to know.
I have the right to know if my genetics are being screwed with, don't I? Don't I? Okay. 3rd part. This is super important.
Any entity that makes a product available in this state that could in fact transmit to or be absorbed in any individual in any way that would act as a medical intervention, vaccine, drug, or genetic modification shall obtain fully informed consent from all individuals who could be exposed to such product before exposure could occur. Fully informed consent requires, at a minimum, that an individual is made aware of all benefits and risks, including side effects of the product, any adverse events of special interest and any other reasonably possible impacts of the product. Alright folks. Informed consent. That's Nuremberg, right?
The Republicans and the Democrats are selling out on this. Let me tell you who's good. Okay. Committee chair Bill Hardwick has been very good on this bill. Holly Jones, really good.
You need to thank them. You need to call them. You need to support them. You need to back them, whatever you can do to tell them thank you for their courage because they're getting beat up. My understanding is there's a couple other members of the committee that are looking at backing this, but they've been told outright, don't vote on this.
Don't have a vote on it. We're gonna shut it down. They've been told outright by Republicans, by lobbyists, by everyone. What they've done is big pharma bear Monsanto, which has a huge, huge presence in Missouri, went to the ag people, the ag lobbyists, and told the ag lobbyists that that part that says that you've got to call your foods, you know, gene therapy products, you know, you have to label everything. Well, first of all, if the what that means is so then these these lobbyists, they come in, they they say, yeah, we don't want to have to label everything as a gene therapy product.
Well, wait a second. Are you tell that means that they're admitting that these GMO foods are affecting your genome. They should be labeled, folks. Why do you oppose it's just a label. Why do you oppose that?
Why do you oppose the consumer knowing that there's a gene therapy potential in the product. Folks, Gates, The Who, a ton of these universities, they're all talking about including mRNA vaccinations as part of food. They're going to modify the genes of these foods to make them mRNA vaccines. Do you know that one of the committee members said that they don't care? They don't care.
Apparently they didn't see the Died Suddenly movie folks. Apparently they don't care if you get to give informed consent on a medical intervention. Either that or they're too stupid to understand what's going on. Either way, this person should not be on the committee. I'm deciding whether to name names on that.
Folks, let me tell you what's going on here. The lobbyists are telling the farmers that this is going to make the, you know, be a disaster for all their food. It's not. The only thing that this does is make sure that these guys can't put mRNA vaccine therapy into food and then give it to you or transmit it through other mechanisms without you knowing. That's all it does.
If a product is a gene therapy product, you have every right to know, but they're trying to make sure that you don't. All this bill does is provide transparency. Are you telling me that Democrat, Republican, left, right, you don't think you have a right to know when a medical intervention is used on you, you don't have a right to know if they're gonna change your genetics. That's all this bill does, but the Republicans are selling out. The egg lobbyists are are throwing a conniption over this.
Why folks? Why? Why would you have a conniption over this unless you planned on doing it? Why are these people do you know that privately, the the elected officials in Missouri are talking about this as one of the most controversial bills in history. They said privately, a number of them has said to me, oh, we've never seen the lobbyists so upset.
Why do you think that is folks? Why do you think that is? These lobbyists have been told their butts on the line. If they get the if this bill keeps going, they're going to be fired. Folks, we, the people need this bill.
What person in Missouri is going to oppose a transparency bill? What person in Missouri? Listen, let's say you're a hardcore leftist. Let's say you are die hard in support of these vaccines. Don't you think you should know before you've taken them?
Do you oppose knowing before you've taken them? Are you okay with them integrating it into your food? Are you okay with that? I'm not. I'm not at all.
I mean, this is insane, folks. And, these people, they're hiding it. I, they're, they're, they're just trying to cover this up. Folks, if this bill passes, then the truth about adverse events of special interests, the truth about informed consent, all this, all of this stuff comes out. Right?
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
Learn more here: https://dailyclout.io/renz-missouri-house-testimony-biotech-admits-gates-gmo-factory-food-is-a-gene-therapy/
Renz Missouri House Testimony - BioTech Admits Gate's GMO Factory Food IS a Gene Therapy
They now want to "vaccinate" us through the food supply. Here's how we can help put an end to it.
dailyclout.io
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
I mistagged Tom. You can find him here: @RenzTom. Please give him a follow and thank him for leading the charge on this issue.
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
Full Video: https://rumble.com/v2foga8-tom-renz-missouri-and-mrna-food-supply-part-1.html
Tom Renz | Missouri and MRNA Food Supply (part 1)
If you care about the #lies that #Fauci has put forward you care about Missouri House Bill No. 1169. It's the most straight forward, simple bill ever put forward, only 2 pages in length, and all it re
rumble.com
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
Vote YES in favor of HB 1169. Click on "introduced" under Bill Texts to read the bill. https://billcam.dailyclout.io/bills/CWDxclsTcy/g/hb-1169/creates-provisions-relating-to-required-disclosures-for-certain-products
HB-1169: Creates provisions relating to required disclosures for certain products
BillCam: HB 1169 Creates provisions relating to required disclosures for certain products Creates provisions relating to required disclosures for certain products
billcam.dailyclout.io
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
BREAKING NEWS: the lobbyists for the cattleman and pork associations in several states have CONFIRMED they WILL be using mRNA vaccines in pigs and cows THIS MONTH. WE MUST SUPPORT #Missouri #HB1169. It is LITERALLY the ONLY chance we have to prevent this… NO ONE knows the the… Show more https://t.co/dae08m7h13
reSee.it AI Summary
Attorney Tom Renz warns that mRNA vaccines could be surreptitiously inserted into the US food supply. Lobbyists for cattleman and pork associations confirm that they will use mRNA vaccines in pigs and cows. Missouri HB 1169 seeks to require labeling and disclosure of any product with gene therapy qualities, informed consent, and disclosure of adverse events. The bill is easy to pass and hard to oppose, but has become the most contentious bill in Missouri history. Transparency and disclosure are all that is being asked for.
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
Surreptitious Insertion of mRNA Could Be in the U.S. Food Supply RIGHT NOW "What's happened is, we found out that they're actually already doing this [inserting mRNA in food] in some countries. And because Congress decided to remove the country of origin labels from food products, if they're doing this in China, it's potentially in our food supply," stated Attorney @RenzTom. "We don't know where our food is coming from, but we know that they're able to do it and probably are doing it now in China. They're going to be doing it in the immediate future if they're not already doing it here in the United States. And that's just in meat; we don't know about in vegetables."
Video Transcript AI Summary
Hospital 1169 requires disclosure of gene therapy qualities in products, discusses transmission of gene therapy aspects, and mandates informed consent. However, there is opposition to the bill, particularly from big pharma and agricultural lobbyists. Research reveals that vaccines may be integrated into foods, with a product called Seqevity already on the market. This technology could potentially transmit mRNA gene therapies from animals to humans. Concerns arise due to the removal of country of origin labels on food products, making it uncertain if this practice is already happening in the United States. Opposition to the bill comes from companies like Bayer Monsanto, who are incorporating gene therapy into seeds and livestock. The fight against informed consent is puzzling.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hospital 11 69 does 3 things. And I'm I'm getting your answer here, but it essentially requires that you disclose if any product has a gene therapy quality. It requires that you talk about how those gene therapy, aspects of the product could be transmitted to other people. And then it requires in full a full informed consent before someone gives you a medical intervention or a gene therapy. So 3 things that are completely non controversial and there's no problem.
Well, we go and we're working on this bill and we're getting massive opposition to informed consent. We're saying, who the heck would oppose this? Well, it turns out that big pharma, through the ag lobbyists, were opposing this massively. And the reason that they're doing it is because, just I started doing this research. And going back to 2000, I've actually found documents going back to the mid nineties where they've talked about integrating vaccines into foods.
Initially, this was done
Speaker 1: Hey, Thomas. One one second. Just I just wanna clarify something. So you're saying that they're currently doing this, Or is this bill to just prevent it from happening in the future?
Speaker 0: Well, that's the thing that was shocking to me is initially, I thought this was to prevent it. But we got word from the pork and cattle some lobbyists who I can't talk about names because these guys would get wire in a heartbeat that they were planning on using mRNA gene therapies, like in the immediate future.
Speaker 1: Well, so I started doing some research and it turns out just there is a product called Seqevity
Speaker 0: on the market from Merck that I'm I'm looking right here. It says, Seqevity harnesses IMR or RNA particle technology to create customized prescription vaccines, in swine. It's there. Not only is it there, but it appears that the technology is getting to the point where they can be transmissible from these animals to people. Just we have I also have and Peter McCullough confirmed this for me.
He's looked at this. And he actually tweeted, and I'm just gonna read his tweet. He says, Chinese successfully reloaded cow's milk with mRNA, and it was absorbed into the GI tract of recipients. Concerns about surreptitious insertion of mRNA into the food are valid, must be stopped. Just what's happened is is we found out that they're actually already doing this in some countries.
And because Congress decided to remove the country of origin labels from food products. If they're doing this in China, it's potentially in our food supply. We don't know where our food's coming from, but we know that they're able to do it and probably are doing it now in China. They're going to be doing it in the immediate future if they're not already doing it here in the United States. And, we that's just in meats.
We don't know about in vegetables.
Speaker 1: So we just got about a minute before we go to break. But if you could just walk through real quick who you said the largest just of opposition to this bill are, because maybe we can kinda reverse engineer out of that what the real issue is. Like I said, about 30 seconds.
Speaker 0: Just Bayer Monsanto is located in Saint Louis and they're driving a lot of this. Bayer bought Monsanto, the largest seed producer on the planet, and they're engineering this into the seed, and, you know, maybe into the cattle and into other things. But big pharma is essentially using the lobbyists. Cattlemen associations fighting it hard. Farm bureaus, just a lot of the chambers of commerce says they're fighting this, because they don't want informed consent.
I it's which is beyond me.
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
If you don't want gene therapy surreptitiously inserted into your food, please share this information far and wide to spread awareness. To learn more about what you can do and Missouri HB 1169, please follow the link below: https://dailyclout.io/eat-your-vaccines-mrna-gene-therapy-is-coming-to-the-food-supply-this-month/
Eat Your Vaccines: mRNA Gene Therapy Is Coming to the Food Supply THIS MONTH
They've given up on a needle in every arm. Now they're coming for what you eat.
dailyclout.io
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
“Lobbyists for the cattleman and pork associations in several states have CONFIRMED they WILL be using mRNA vaccines in pigs and cows THIS MONTH,” warned attorney @RenzTom. mRNA food is coming — and it's coming fast.
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
“Gates, the WHO, a ton of these universities: they’re all talking about including mRNA vaccinations as part of the food. They’re going to modify the genes of these foods to make them mRNA vaccines,” he warned in this video.
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
But Missouri HB 1169 seeks to counter such practices. It’s been described as “one of the most controversial bills in history,” but all it is – is a labeling bill. It doesn’t ban anything. You have every right to know if a food product is a gene therapy product.
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
So, if this bill gets passed, it’s a major victory for informed consent and, in all likelihood, our well-being. The entire two-page bill is available to read on DailyClout (https://billcam.dailyclout.io/bill-texts/uNWj5bOW6b). Here’s an excerpt:
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
"Any product that has been created to act as, or exposed to processes that could result in the product potentially acting as, a gene therapy or that could otherwise possibly impact, alter, or introduce genetic material or a genetic change into the user of the product, individuals exposed to the product, or individuals exposed to others who have used the product shall be conspicuously labeled with the words "Potential Gene Therapy Product" unless the product is known to be a gene therapy product. "Reasonable steps shall be taken to ensure the potential purchaser or user of the product is made aware of the presence of this label. If a product is known to be a gene therapy product, the product shall be conspicuously labeled with the words "Gene Therapy Product". The provisions of this section shall be liberally construed in favor of disclosure of any potential gene therapy product."
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
The bill was written in a way “to be as easy to pass and as hard to oppose as possible,” conveyed attorney Renz. Missouri HB 1169 does three things:
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
1.) “It requires labeling and disclosure of any product that has any gene therapy qualities.”
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
2.) “It requires that if you have a product on the market that has gene therapy qualities, that anyone can call the company and say, ‘hey, how does this spread? ‘Does it shed? ... Or is there a way that this can spread?’ And they have to disclose it.”
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
3.) “It requires informed consent. And informed consent includes serious events or adverse events of special interest. … And it requires informed consent before you be given anything with the gene therapy or medicinal property.”
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
“So, this isn’t difficult,” stressed attorney Renz. “I don’t think this is a Democrat bill or Republican bill. It’s sponsored by a Republican (Rep. Holly Jones) but should be universally supported.”
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
However, “[t]his has become the most contentious bill in Missouri history,” he lamented. “All we’re asking for is transparency and disclosure.”
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
Now, pharma can’t come out and oppose transparency and disclosure. So they would need the agricultural community to have their back. Remember, Bill Gates and the CCP are the two largest holders of agriculture in America.
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
“So these guys [Gates & CCP] throw money at these guys [agricultural associations] — buy off these guys. They’re not representing the local farmers,” attested attorney @RenzTom.
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
But here’s the reason this bill is so important. If attorney Tom Renz helps pass Missouri HB 1169, “those disclosures and the ability to get that information (is gene therapy in my food?) apply globally.” he explained.
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
“So if we can win in one state, the truth in Missouri is the truth in Iowa. So we’ve got to get everybody on the planet calling these guys, telling them you got to pass this — you got to stand for we the people. All it is – is transparency and disclosure," he said.
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
"We don’t even ban it. They can still make their poison foods. I just need to know if I’m eating them," @RenzTom expressed.
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
So, whether you’re in Missouri, Iowa, the United Kingdom, or Australia, you need to help push HB 1169 across the finish line. Because as @RenzTom said, if the bill passes in Iowa, “those disclosures and the ability to get that information apply globally.”
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
So, share this bill (https://billcam.dailyclout.io/bills/CWDxclsTcy/g/hb-1169/creates-provisions-relating-to-required-disclosures-for-certain-products) on social media, call your local legislators — ask your representatives why a bill similar to HB 1169 is not being discussed in your neck of the woods. https://billcam.dailyclout.io/bills/CWDxclsTcy/g/hb-1169/creates-provisions-relating-to-required-disclosures-for-certain-products)
HB-1169: Creates provisions relating to required disclosures for certain products
BillCam: HB 1169 Creates provisions relating to required disclosures for certain products Creates provisions relating to required disclosures for certain products
billcam.dailyclout.io
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
They’ve already given up on a needle in every arm. Make them do the same when it comes to inserting gene therapy into your food.
reSee.it AI Summary
Florida lawmakers plan to classify mRNA Covid vaccines as bioweapons, seeking to ban their administration in the state. The Brevard Republican Executive Committee urges Gov Ron DeSantis to sign the legislation, citing claims of vaccine-related deaths and disabilities. The resolution calls for a ban on vaccine sale and distribution, seizure of remaining doses for safety testing, and mandatory disclosures on mRNA or gene-altering products in the state.
@_APWK_ - Luiz
BREAKING: Florida To Officially Classify mRNA COVID Shots As Illegal ‘Bio-Weapons’ Lawmakers in Florida have announced plans to officially designate mRNA Covid vaccines as “bio-weapons” that are hazardous to human health. The proposed law seeks to BAN the administration of mRNA shots to anybody in the state. The Brevard Republican Executive Committee has urged Gov. Ron DeSantis to sign the legislation, which will outlaw Covid-19 vaccines, as soon as possible. The non-binding resolution was passed by a supermajority vote of committee membership Thursday. It now goes to DeSantis to sign. http://Floridatoday.com reports: A draft version of the resolution reviewed by reporters closely mirrors one passed by the Lee County Republican Party in February, drawing national headlines. “Strong and credible evidence has recently been revealed that Covid-19 and Covid-19 injections are biological and technological weapons,” the Brevard draft resolution says, citing claims that have been disproven and disputed by respected medical groups. “An enormous number of humans have died or been permanently disabled” by the vaccine, it says. “Government agencies, media and tech companies, and other corporations, have committed enormous fraud by claiming Covid-19 injections are safe and effective.” It calls on DeSantis to ban sale and distribution of the vaccine “and all related vaccines,” and for Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody to seize all remaining doses in the state for safety testing, “on behalf of the preservation of the human race,” it says. It also calls for mandatory disclosures on any product in the state “using mRNA or gene altering or therapeutic technology.”
Video Transcript AI Summary
Republican party leaders in Brevard County, Florida are planning to call on state leaders to ban mRNA-based COVID vaccines, claiming they are biological weapons. They believe that government agencies, media, tech companies, and other corporations have committed fraud by promoting the safety and effectiveness of these vaccines. The leaders are preparing a letter to be sent to Tallahassee, coinciding with a grand jury investigation into the vaccines. If the ban is approved, no one in Florida would be allowed to receive the vaccines. Meanwhile, the federal government has urged drug companies to make the vaccines more affordable and accessible. The vote on the ban is expected to pass, as there is significant support for it.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Vaccine turns out it's back in the news.
Speaker 1: Republican party leaders on the Space Coast are minutes away from officially calling on the governor and other state leaders to ban mRNA based COVID vaccines immediately. IT chief investigator Mike Magnolia has more on what exactly is going on. Mike.
Speaker 0: Good Good evening, everybody. Well, in their own words, the leaders of Brevard County's GOP say that they believe the vaccines are a biological weapon. As you say, this is the executive committee of the party in Brevard. They haven't hit send on this letter yet, but that vote coming up 630 and I'm told it's very likely going to pass. If it does, they're asking state leadership to make it illegal to give or to take mRNA vaccines in Florida.
In this 4 page letter, complete with footnotes, Brevard County Republicans cite sources Which led them to a stunning conclusion. Here it is in their own words. Government agencies, media and tech companies, And other corporations have committed enormous fraud by claiming COVID nineteen injections are safe and effective. Strong and credible evidence has recently been revealed that COVID nineteen and COVID nineteen injections are biological and technological weapons. If approved, this letter will be sent to Tallahassee at a time when a grand jury requested by governor DeSantis Is investigating those very same vaccines.
That grand jury's job is to determine whether pharmaceutical giants Who brought the mRNA vaccines to market broke any laws and should face charges. It's already illegal to require anyone to get the COVID vaccine in Florida, but if state leaders go along with Brevard's request, no one in Florida would be allowed to get those vaccines. Today, the federal government sent a very different letter to drug companies calling on them to make the COVID vaccines cheaper and more accessible, Anticipating an increase in demand come flu season. The Brevard County Republicans gathering right now. That vote is expected sometime during the 6 o'clock hour, but I can tell you there is major support for this going forward.
@RebelNews_CA - Rebel News Canada
Florida's Surgeon General slams the new, untested mRNA vaccine: “There’s essentially no evidence for it. There’s been no clinical trial done in human beings showing that it benefits people. There's been no clinical trial showing that it is a safe product for people...”
Video Transcript AI Summary
There is a new mRNA COVID-19 vaccine, but there is no evidence to support its effectiveness or safety in human trials. Additionally, several studies from different countries suggest that these vaccines may actually increase the risk of contracting COVID-19 over time. This is concerning and not a typical outcome.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There's a new vaccine that's coming around the corner, new mRNA COVID nineteen vaccine. And there's there's essentially no evidence for it. There's been no clinical trial done in human beings showing that it benefits people. There's been no clinical trial showing that it is a safe product for people. And not only that, but then there, there are a lot of red plaques.
So something that you don't hear much about, but we'll be talking more about is that there are multiple studies now from around the world, Brazil, I think Australia, United States, that show that over time these vaccines, these mRNA COVID nineteen products actually increase your chances of contracting COVID nineteen. That's, you know, that's not normal.
@gatewaypundit - The Gateway Pundit
Florida Surgeon General Dr. Joseph Ladapo Warns Americans Not to Take New Covid Vaccine (VIDEO) via @gatewaypundit
Florida Surgeon General Dr. Joseph Ladapo Warns Americans Not to Take New Covid Vaccine (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit | by David Greyson
Dr.
thegatewaypundit.com
@GlobalHProject - Global Health Project
Awesome state senate testimony on possible mechanism of harm within #COVID19 platform. The dam is breaking
@ChuckCallesto - Chuck Callesto
JUST IN: Texas House Speaker Dade Phelan just ruled to KEEP COVID VACCINE MANDATES in Texas for college students, medical and nursing students.. SHOULD HE BE VOTED OUT? https://t.co/MzfnZanLrp
Video Transcript AI Summary
Miss Duena raises a point of order regarding the Harrison Amendment on article 3 section 40 of the Texas constitution. She argues that the subject matter of the amendment is not included in the governor's proclamation, which focuses on legislation prohibiting COVID-19 vaccines by private employers. The amendment seeks to extend this prohibition to all individuals, regardless of their employment status. Miss Duena suggests that the proclamation should only pertain to a specific field, leaving the legislature to determine the extent of coverage.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Miss Duena raises a point of order that is put into consideration of the Harrison Amendment on article 3 section 40 of the Texas constitution on the ground of the subject matter of the amendment is not included in the govern governor's proclamation. The proclamation submits the Constitution, subject of legislation prohibiting COVID nineteen vaccines by private employers. The amendment would apply the bills mandate prohibition to any person regardless of whether the person is performing work for a private employer. The proclamation confines cons the business to a particular field which may not be covered which may be covered in such a way that the legislature may determine. The field, in this case, is confined to
@catsscareme2021 - Jessica Rojas 🇺🇸💪
Watch this before you vaccinate. 2019 hearing in CT. A must watch. https://t.co/oAkOl18BP8
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker criticizes the hearing as an inadequate substitute for a bipartisan committee hearing. They argue that there was ample opportunity to go through the proper legislative process in the last five months. They express concern about the lack of transparency and accessibility of the legislation being discussed. The speaker, who works as a paralegal for a vaccine injury attorney, claims to witness vaccine injuries regularly and questions the safety of vaccines. They mention the absence of double-blind placebo safety studies for childhood vaccines and challenge the assertion that unvaccinated individuals pose a threat to immunocompromised individuals. The speaker also raises concerns about the increase in childhood chronic illnesses and questions the removal of First Amendment rights in relation to vaccine mandates. They argue that vaccination is akin to a religion and express their refusal to participate in a forced religion. The speaker concludes by asking the audience if they would vote for a party that prioritizes their decision-making over parental choice and questions the necessity of the increasing number of vaccines.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This hearing, whatever this is considered, is in no way an acceptable substitute for a bipartisan committee hearing. There were plenty of opportunities to do this properly in the last 5 months and put it through the proper legislative process, and we should have done it that way. This is a little bit of fly by night, and it's not at all indicative of to the proper legislative process. Representative Linehan recently stated in a public hearing that she would not comment on a bill that she hadn't seen the language of. Well, we didn't want to either.
There's no piece of legislation that the public could even read before coming here to speak, and that's not acceptable. It's not democratic, and that's not even really American. The very definition of legislative creep that we all warned you about has now has now arrived. I'm a paralegal for a vaccine injury attorney in New York City who represents families in the federal vaccine injury compensation program, and I see vaccine injury every single day of my personal and professional life, and it's the stunning. We are the law firm that's suing the city of New York for the forced vaccination orders and work closely with the team of attorneys who are fighting the Rockland County vaccination orders as well.
This. I also attend the CDC meetings of the advisory committee of immunization practices and testify to them multiple times a year. Per the 1986 act that grants vaccine makers blanket immunity for injury or death caused by their products. Vaccine injury is literally the law of our land. My job requires me to have a well rounded understanding of the topic and also provides me access to renowned medical experts, one of that we've flown here today, and I will be introducing shortly, that have helped me translate and understand the science that shows vaccines truly are causing harm to our children.
One of them, we excuse me. I skipped that one. I also learned how to FOIA request information that's missing. To quote doctor Valerie Horsley in her advertisement of this event, once a vaccine is approved for use, its safety is continually monitored through both active and passive surveillance systems. Through recent FOIA requests in conjuncture with Bobby Kennedy and Del Bigtree in their organizations that we've discovered that there are 0 double blind placebo safety studies for childhood vaccines.
Therefore, no way to know the risk of or the risk profile for any vaccine, including the MMR, which was only tested for 42 days on a population of 800 adults. Without plea placebo testing. No one, not miss Horsley, not miss Terranova, not the commissioner of public health, can point to any one vaccine them specifically and say that it is more or less dangerous than the disease itself because there is no data on the planet to support that. That, and we, yet we're still recommending vaccines to immunocompromised individuals as well. There is no data to support that a non vaccinated individual is of any threat to an immunocompromised individual.
I challenge that assertion and request the source data, for that assertion as well. To say untrue to say otherwise is simply untrue and unethical. The data is just not there to support this. How can any responsible legislature or governing body consider mandating a pharmaceutical product without being able to properly assess the risks involved? This.
Is this really for public health or profitability? Since the 1986 law was passed, childhood chronic illness this, chronic illness has grown concurrently with the 6 fold increase in vaccines given to our children. Chronic illness in kids jumped from 13% this to 54%. 54% of our kids are suffering from a chronic illness. There's your health crisis, representative Ritter.
And miss Linehan, with all due respect, your public statements that vaccines, for the most part, are safe and effective are wholly inaccurate and unsupported. I've got the data for that. Please listen to us. I know what you're and to say, I thought you took a religious exemption. Why are you talking about science and health?
Because everything I just explained, is it it's indicative of the lack of evidence. There is no emergency for the removal of the first amendment rights, including my freedom of religion. According to the dictionary.com, a religion is a body of persons adhering to a particular set of beliefs and practices. The first amendment guarantees freedoms concerning religion. It forbids congress from both promoting one religion over others and also guarantees the free exercise of an individual's religious practices.
The infant drug program, commonly known as the vaccine program, is a religion, and the mandates are equivalent to forcing a religion on those with different beliefs. With infant drugs, one must believe that the drug or vaccine is safe, effective, and necessary as they are told by their doctors or priests who are given instructions by the CDC, their church leaders, who are governed by the pharmaceutical industry, the church. If anyone challenges the orthodoxy, they're excommunicated or Wakefield ed. One must have faith that the vaccine will protect their child or themselves from disease in order to participate in the vaccination ritual. And one must be willing to accept the risk of an adverse event or even sacrifice their child so that other children will supposedly be protected from infection.
Those who believe in vaccination are willing to accept that risk for their children according to their beliefs. I, we, do not share the belief in vaccination. I'm secure in my faith, and I do not consent to participate in a forced religion. I do not consent to be forced into homeschooling based on flawed data from the Department of Public Health and unsupported claims by the media and some members of this this legislature. My religious creed as defined by Connecticut statutes is my own, and I do not need to identify with any organized religion to express this for any reason.
My religious creed does not condone child harm, including children other than my do own. That's why we stay home when we're sick, to protect others. I will never consent to something that I know could harm my son when the established science does not support this legislator's egregious actions. Removing the right to choose now not only accepts the current the 72 dose schedule that I just explained as dangerously flawed, but it will mandate any or all of the two 70 vaccines that are currently in various stages of the developmental pipeline. How many is enough for you?
I'm sure legislators I'm not sure that certain legislators realize the generational damage that they're doing to their own party. So I'll end my the speech with a question for the entire room and one for the panel. By show of hands in this room, how many people will never again, vote for the party who inserted their decision making over their parental chews. Ever. And for the panel, I'd like to know what vaccines are required to achieve when we have 72 doses now and different generations had different amounts of doses.
Thank you so much. That concludes your testimony. Thank you very much. For someone who felt they were ill prepared, I think
reSee.it AI Summary
The Kansas health agency has stopped its TV campaign promoting the COVID-19 vaccine after Republican lawmakers objected to calling it safe and effective. During a confirmation hearing, acting secretary Janet Stanek faced skepticism and concern from lawmakers. The debate highlights the ongoing division over vaccine safety and public health.
@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson
Kansas pulls COVID vaccine ads from TV after lawmakers object to calling them safe and effective In a shocking turn of events, the Kansas health agency was forced to halt its television campaign advocating for the COVID-19 vaccine. This abrupt stop came after a group of Republican lawmakers passionately contested the description of the vaccine as safe and effective. The distressing details surfaced during the intense confirmation hearing of Janet Stanek before the Senate Public Health and Welfare Committee. Stanek, who stands as the acting secretary of the Kansas Department of Health and Environment, was confronted with a storm of skepticism and concern. In a previous January meeting, the same committee had fervently debated COVID-19, with some members arguing that the KDHE must tread more cautiously when proclaiming the vaccines as safe and effective, echoing the fears and uncertainties of many. The situation paints a picture of a deeply divided arena, where the battle over vaccine safety and public health rages on. #SafeAndEffective #VaccineInjuries #VAERS #mRNA #USA #Kansas ⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️ https://finance.yahoo.com/news/kansas-pulls-covid-vaccine-ads-114807094.html?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly90LmNvLw&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAL1bCoeu8o-t-zxXgHG8WWQNY5stDtNcJRSncSE9oFeosDrfVkcOeIk30caWlVCPTBIfIGPVHt--xMTppSfk4x4XxRQ12YpIfj1bhEgDTLvT1DKDK3cQ-Zh4uqKNhSwy8f99BhKgh64fq6D12UYHfZxqGaxvbAyxh9AJpnbrpqBu
Kansas pulls COVID vaccine ads from TV after lawmakers object to calling them safe and effective
Acting KDHE Secretary Janet Stanek told lawmakers the Kansas health agency has pulled TV ads that promoted COVID-19 vaccines.
finance.yahoo.com
@Inquiry_Canada - National Citizens Inquiry (NCI | CeNC)
"What they created was not a vaccine." -Dr. Charles Hoffe Full testimony: https://rumble.com/v3qvij5-dr.-charles-hoffe-may-03-2023-vancouver-british-columbia.html?mref=1sktjm&mc=2l88w #StoptheShots
Video Transcript AI Summary
No successful coronavirus vaccine has been made. Gene-based vaccines were tested on animals, leading to sickness and death. Despite concerns about safety and lack of long-term data, Canada continued vaccine rollout. A doctor raised safety concerns, was reprimanded for causing vaccine hesitancy, and saw neurological issues in patients post-vaccination. Questions to health authorities went unanswered, leading to a complaint to the College of Physicians and Surgeons.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: People need to know that there has never been any successful vaccine made against coronaviruses. And so when the first dangerous coronavirus appeared in 2002, which came out of Wuhan in China, which was called the SARS virus, Following that, scientists tried to make a gene based vaccine against it because all previous conventional vaccines against coronaviruses had failed to either be safe or effective. So they would test they tested this on laboratory animals. Ferrets and mink and other animals like that are very susceptible to coronaviruses and so they developed a gene based vaccine which they tested on these laboratory animals. And when they took blood from these laboratory animals that had been vaccinated, they found they had antibodies to the coronavirus and they realized that they had discovered a brilliant new cheap and effective way of making vaccines.
However, several months later, when they challenged these laboratory animals with the infectious organism that they had been vaccinated against, they found that these laboratory animals became extremely sick and many of them died. So this new type of vaccine turned out to be a complete failure. In fact, what they had created was not a vaccine, but an anti vaccine Because instead of protecting those animals against this new virus, it actually made them more vulnerable than if they had not been vaccinated. The reason why I'm telling you that is that I'm going to show you what has happened to Canada and exactly the same thing has happened here. So, when I heard that they were again using gene based vaccines against SARS CoV-two, the second SARS virus, I was not filled with hope or confidence because I knew that the previous efforts had been a disastrous failure.
And when I heard that with the new vaccines they weren't even doing animal trials, I was even more concerned. When I realized that they were rolling this out with no long term safety data, it had only been the shots had only been tested on a select group of relatively healthy adults, no children, no pregnant people, no frail elderly, no First Nations people, a lot of demographic groups that had had literally not been tested on at all. And it was Warp Speed Technology which is a disaster for any vaccine and particularly for a brand new technology that had no history of safety or effectiveness. So 2 and a half months into the vax rollout when 12 countries in Europe had already shut down the AstraZeneca vaccine because of life threatening blood clots. And Canada was continuing to barrel on with it because Trudeau said even though it wasn't safe for the people of Europe, it was fine for Canadians.
I thought that this was a significant safety signal that we could not afford to ignore. And so, I sent an email to a group of doctors, medical colleagues, doctors, nurses and pharmacists in the Littin, Lillooet area of Southern British Columbia saying, we have reached a turning point in this vaccine rollout. There is a serious safety signal in Europe. And for any healthcare practitioner to administer these shots without informing the people of the risk of harm, there is a serious liability issue for those people because there is no informed consent. I sent this as a private email to 18 colleagues.
1 of those people sent this to the regional health authorities and 3 days later, I was in a meeting with my superiors there who told me that I was guilty of causing vaccine hesitancy and that that private email was being sent to the College of Physicians and Surgeons as a complaint because I was putting people at risk by creating vaccine hesitancy. And I was told that I was not allowed to say anything negative about these vaccines in the course of my work as an emergency room doctor. And I was told that if I had any questions about them, the questions were not to be directed to my colleagues but to the medical health officer in charge of the vaccine rollout for our area. So I accepted my reprimand. I then began to see very serious neurological problems arising in my own patients.
I had been these people's family doctor for 29 years. I knew them very well. And when I saw new disease processes initiated in these people that I had no explanation with, that all started anywhere between, anywhere up to 72 hours after their shot in every case, I sent a letter to this medical health officer that I had been told to direct my questions. And I asked them what disease process was being initiated by this gene based therapy and how, as these people's doctors, should I be treating it? And I asked whether it was ethical to continue this vaccine rollout in the light of the evidence of harm.
And the silence was deafening. That letter was sent as a complaint to the College of Physicians and Surgeons.
Dr. Charles Hoffe - May 03, 2023 - Vancouver, British Columbia
In his attempts to bring attention to the suffering of his patients from the shots he had administered to his patients, Dr. Charles Hoffe questioned his superiors in health as to whether him submittin
rumble.com
@iluminatibot - illuminatibot
Doctor dropping truth bombs on the Covid vaccines https://t.co/uv8Uui9SkU
Video Transcript AI Summary
Dr. Sean Brooks, PhD, warns against mRNA vaccines, claiming they will lead to immune system decline, antibody-dependent enhancement, blood clotting, and sterilization. He predicts widespread illness and death, urging against vaccination.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: My name's doctor Sean Brooks, PhD, Oxford. I have 48 public patients including 23 folks. I studied health medicine and anatomy and physiology for approximately 21 years. Doctor Robert Malone, who created the messenger RNA vaccine, has said no one should ever take these jabs ever. Under any circumstance whatsoever, he created it.
And he says, don't ever do it. So let me explain what's going to happen to the people who have taken take it. Excuse me. The people who have taken it are going to die in the next 6 months to 3 to 5 years for three reasons. Number 1, you've dramatically decreased your own immune system by 35%.
The first jab did it by at least 15. The second reason, antibody dependent enhancement. Antib antibody dependent enhancement is what is happening with these jabs with everybody who has taken them. Unless, of course, you've taken a placebo, but there's no way that you would know that. So given that fact, antibody dependent enhancement tricks the entire body into believing that the cell that's eating the pathogen is eating it when it isn't.
It ends up leading to what's called a cytokine storm, which causes organ failure. That will cause your death and there's no stopping that. No amount of drugs will stop that. The third thing, blood clotting. Everyone who has taken the jabs is blood clotting.
If you don't believe me, there's a way you can find out. Take what's called the d dimer test. What that does is that detects blood clotting at the microscopic level. We're cutting full blood clots out of people right now. As I'm talking to you, millions have died from the jabs.
In your last meeting, you advocated for people to take the jabs potentially in the future, along with wearing masks. And I heard parents say the same thing. So to the parents who are actually considering jabbing their own children, you're going to sterilize them permanently. People who have taken the jabs are sterilized. 80% of women who have been jabbed have lost their children in the first trimester.
You can't have kids. You've also injected yourself with the equivalent of HIV. You can now no longer breastfeed, donate blood, donate organs, donate blood plasma nor bone marrow. If you don't believe me, try to donate blood and blood plasma and find out what happens. You will be denied.
Unless, of course, you live in California, in which case they're allowing people to donate toxic blood with spike proteins in it. The jabs create spike proteins. They're in the jabs themselves and they create it by snapping your r n a in half. You are no longer a human anymore. You are something else.
And you are susceptible to countless diseases. Now, here's what's gonna happen in the future very quickly. We'll get them 15 seconds. Great. I don't know what percentage of your staff is taking the jabs, but your school is going to close.
You will not stay open. You will close because they will fall ill and they will die. That will happen in all of your buildings. It will have it's already happening. Thank you, sir.
I I bet it is. It's already happening. Good luck. There's nothing to stop this. Thank you, sir.
reSee.it AI Summary
The Arizona GOP has declared COVID injections as "biological and technological weapons" and passed a "Ban the Jab" resolution. They are urging the Governor to ban and seize the injections for forensic analysis. The resolution cites evidence of deaths, adverse cases, and DNA alteration. The media has not covered this story, raising questions about its significance. The resolution text calls for the prohibition of COVID injections and mRNA injections in Arizona. The author asks for support and mentions bonus content for paid subscribers.
@PeterSweden7 - PeterSweden
WOAH: Arizona GOP just declared covid injections "biological weapons" They are calling on the Governor to BAN and SEIZE all covid injections for a forensic analysis. The Republican party of Arizona just passed a "Ban the Jab" resolution. This is big news, yet I haven't seen anything about it on the mainstream media. You see, the Arizona Republican Party just declared the covid injections as "biological and technological weapons" as they passed a "Ban the Jab" resolution. With a whopping 95.62% of the votes, they passed the resolution. A massive majority. But what is interesting is what the resolution actually says - Because it says some pretty politically incorrect things. And the Arizona GOP are also calling on the Governor to BAN the covid injections and to SEIZE the vials to do a forensic analysis of the contents. That is interesting, what will they find if they do an analysis of the injections? We now know that Pfizer for example WITHELD information from authorities about DNA contamination in the injections. Here is the text of the resolution: "Whereas: Strong and credible evidence shows Covid 19 and Covid 19 injections are biological and technological weapons, and Pfizer's clinical data revealed 1,223 deaths, 42,000 adverse cases, 158,000 adverse incidents, and approximately 1,000 side effects, and an enormous number of people have died and or have been permanently disabled after having been injected by the Covid 19 injections, and strong and credible evidence from Sweden exists that Covid mRNA shots alter human DNA, and government agencies, media, and tech companies, and other corporations have committed enormous fraud by claiming Covid injections are safe and effective, and The Florida Department of Health has called for a halt to the mRNA injections, and continued experimentation on humans and denial of informed consent are violations of the Nuremberg Code and therefore constitute crimes against humanity, Resolved: On behalf of the preservation of the human race, the 2024 Arizona Republican Party Presidential Nominating Convention Delegates call upon Governor Hobbs and the state legislature to prohibit the sale and distribution of Covid injections and all mRNA injections in Arizona, and for the Arizona Attorney General to immediately seize all Covid injections and mRNA injections in Arizona and perform a forensic analysis on these so-called "vaccines."" So there we have it. Do you support this move? Will anyone in the media cover this story? Please SHARE - I haven't seen a single article in the mainstream news about this. 🔴👇 If you appreciate the work that I do to bring you the news that is being CENSORED by the mainstream media, please consider supporting my work by becoming a paid subscriber. It really helps a lot AND as a paid subscriber you also get access bonus content such as my in-depth investigative articles! Thank you 💪
@vejon_health - Vejon Health - Dr Philip McMillan
Should mRNA Covid Vaccines Be Banned? (2024) https://t.co/kkHM83nfev
@thehealthb0t - healthbot
Doctor dropping truth bombs on the Covid vaccines https://t.co/mEWQg6f6J4
Video Transcript AI Summary
My name is Dr. Sean Brooks, PhD from Oxford. I have studied health and medicine for 21 years. Dr. Robert Malone, the creator of the mRNA vaccine, advises against taking these vaccines under any circumstances. Those who have taken the vaccine may face severe health issues, including a 35% reduction in immune function, leading to potential death within 6 months to 5 years. This is compounded by antibody-dependent enhancement, which can cause organ failure, and increased blood clotting. Many vaccinated individuals may also face infertility, with 80% of vaccinated women losing pregnancies in the first trimester. The vaccines alter RNA, making individuals susceptible to various diseases. Schools may close as staff members fall ill. There is no remedy for these outcomes.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: My name is doctor Sean Brooks, PhD, Oxford. I have 48 publications including 23 folks. I studied health medicine, anatomy, and physiology for approximately 21 years. Doctor Robert Malone, who created the messenger RNA vaccine, has said no one should ever take these jabs ever. Under any circumstance whatsoever, he created it.
And he says don't ever do it. So let me explain what's going to happen to the people who have taken take it. Excuse me. The people who have taken it are going to die in the next 6 months to 3 to 5 years for three reasons. Number 1, you've dramatically decreased your own immune system by 35%.
The first jab did it by at least 15. The second did it by 35. Now, if you take any booster shot, you will die. That's it. You take a flu shot in the future, you will die.
The second reason, antibody dependent enhancement. Antib antibody dependent enhancement is what is happening with these jabs with everybody who has taken them. Unless, of course, you've taken a placebo, but there's no way that you would know that. So given that fact, antibody dependent enhancement tricks the entire body into believing that the cell that's eating the pathogen is eating it when it isn't. It ends up leading to what's called a cytokine storm, which causes organ failure.
That will cause your death and there's no stopping that. No amount of drugs will stop that. The third thing, blood clotting. Everyone who has taken the jabs is blood clotting. If you don't believe me, there's a way you can find out.
Take what's called the d dimer test. What that does is that detects blood clotting at the microscopic level. We're cutting full blood clots out of people right now. As I'm talking to you, millions have died from the jabs. In your last meeting, you advocated for people to take the jabs potentially in the future, along with wearing masks.
And I heard parents say the same thing. So to the parents who are actually considering jabbing their own children, you're going to sterilize them permanently. People who have taken the jabs are sterilized. 80% of women who have been jabbed have lost their children in the first trimester. You can't have kids.
You've also injected yourself with the equivalent of HIV. You can now no longer breastfeed, donate blood, donate organs, donate blood plasma nor bone marrow. If you don't believe me, try to donate blood and blood plasma and find out what happens. You will be denied. Unless, of course, you live in California, in which case they're allowing people to donate toxic blood with spike proteins in it.
The jabs create spike proteins. They're in the jabs themselves and they create it by snapping your RNA in half. You are no longer a human anymore. You are something else And you are susceptible to countless diseases. Now here's what's gonna happen in the future very quickly.
Yeah. 15 seconds. Great. I don't know what percentage of your staff has taken the jabs, but your school is going to close. You will not stay open.
You will close because they will fall ill and they will die. That will happen in all of your buildings. It will have it's already happening. Thank you, sir. I'm I bet it is.
It's already happening. Good luck. There's nothing to stop this. No.
@thehealthb0t - healthbot
How to refuse a vaccine https://t.co/L4GvFmMHST
Video Transcript AI Summary
Are you being pressured by your school or employer to get a COVID-19 vaccination? No one has the authority to force you to take experimental treatments. COVID-19 injections are not fully approved vaccines, and there are serious concerns about their safety and effectiveness. To protect yourself, you can access powerful documents from Solari that hold institutions accountable for any adverse reactions. These documents require institutions to acknowledge the risks and take personal liability for any harm caused. Simply fill out the forms with your information, send them via certified mail, and keep copies for your records. This process helps ensure your health decisions remain under your control.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Are you a student and your school or college is telling you that you must have a vaccination? Are you an employee and your employer is telling you that you must have a vaccination? No one, not even the government, has the authority to force or coerce vaccinations. Many companies and institutions have become zealots in promoting COVID 19 injections due to corruption, self interest, or ignorance about the injuries and deaths from adverse reactions to the experimental injections. Mass censorship and false information about the effectiveness of those injections has created serious misunderstandings about these unapproved experimental and hazardous medical treatments.
The fact is, COVID-nineteen injections are not even vaccines by definition. And while each manufacturer has different issues with their injections, none of them have been shown to be safe or effective and none of them have been approved by the FDA for non emergency use. On a daily basis there is mounting evidence of very strange injuries, deaths, and adverse reactions from the experimental COVID-nineteen injections. You should never allow any institution, doctor, or friend to pressure you into taking experimental or unproven medications. I'm gonna show you how to take control of that and protect yourself and your family.
Solari has some very powerful documents online for you to copy, edit, and present to any school, college, or employer where you are being pressured to take the experimental COVID 19 injections, which they are calling vaccines. These documents make it impossible for any institutional officer to claim ignorance of COVID 19 injection risks. They require that the institution's officers take full personal liability for any injuries, deaths and losses caused by the experimental treatment. They require that they acknowledge the possible adverse reactions and negative consequences of the treatment. They require that the institution's officers acknowledge the specific laws and codes that prohibit coerced experimental medical treatments.
Those laws and codes are included in those documents, and the documents are free. Catherine Austin Fitts, who publishes the Solari report and website, has put together these very powerful documents in the spirit of public service because there are so many people and institutions now which are violating the law and our rights by trying to control the medicines and treatments we take. These are documents which you present to anyone who is trying to coerce you into taking medical treatments. Here's how to navigate to these forms. Go to pandemic.
Solari.com. In the blue navigation bar, hover over employer and school forms. Select either the employer or the school form link. Even if you believe that you should take the COVID 19 injections, you need to present these forms to protect you in the case of any adverse reaction or negative consequences. These forms represent your requirement that they understand they cannot force vaccinations, they must inform you of the risks, and they must take full responsibility for any damages they cause.
Simply put your name and address on the form printed out and present it to your school, college, or employer. It is best to send them by certified mail so you have proof of delivery. The forms require response by your school or employer. If they don't respond, your mail receipts are proof that they were noticed. Once any institutional officer receives this document, it is hard to imagine they would dare to coerce medical treatment upon you.
The document informs them of the possible consequences they face if they attempt to coerce medical treatment on you. Remember, these are templates, so you remove any instructions and format it like a letter. Add your name and address and the name and address of the recipient whoever's coercing the COVID 19 injections and then add the date, a salutation, and sign it at the bottom, then send it by US certified mail. Keep copies and mail receipts as record of the delivery. If you deliver by hand, you won't have proof of delivery.
You do want that proof because this document may change the legal status of you and the recipient to give you the advantage in the relationship. Without proof of delivery, they can claim they never saw it. Your health and health care should never be controlled by anyone but you. These documents are how you get that control.
reSee.it AI Summary
Years after I and others urged the Alberta government to halt Covid injections, the task force has confirmed our concerns. For the health of Albertans, I call on @ABDanielleSmith to ban all mRNA injections immediately. The report is available for review.
@PaulMitchell_AB - Paul Mitchell
Years after myself and many others told the Alberta government to stop the Covid injections, the Alberta task force finally confirms we were right. For the health of Albertans, ban all mRNA injections @ABDanielleSmith. They are harmful. Do it now.
@globeandmail - The Globe and Mail
Alberta task force recommends halt of COVID-19 vaccines in new report https://www.theglobeandmail.com/canada/article-alberta-releases-secret-report-into-the-provinces-covid-response/
Alberta task force recommends halt of COVID-19 vaccines in new report
The task force’s final report into pandemic response touched on several points common with disinformation campaigns such as the effectiveness of public health restrictions and masking
theglobeandmail.com
@PaulMitchell_AB - Paul Mitchell
Here is the full report. 👇 https://open.alberta.ca/dataset/88bbf80e-f8c8-4355-b751-c2086e204b34/resource/33d1d7d5-2596-4e57-a1ad-d93c10920069/download/hlth-albertas-covid-19-pandemic-response-2025-01.pdf
@redpillb0t - redpillbot
Video Transcript AI Summary
The vaccine is back in the news as Republican leaders in Brevard County are set to call for an immediate ban on mRNA-based COVID vaccines. The Brevard GOP executive committee believes these vaccines are a biological weapon. They are expected to vote on a letter requesting state leaders to make it illegal to administer or receive mRNA vaccines in Florida. The letter, which includes citations, outlines their reasoning and is likely to pass during the upcoming vote.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The vaccine turns out it's back in the news. Republican party leaders on the Space Coast are minutes away from officially calling on the governor and other state leaders to ban mRNA based COVID vaccines immediately. IT chief investigator Mike Magnolia has more on what exactly is going on. Mike. Good evening, everybody.
Well, in their own words, the leaders of Brevard County's GOP say that they believe the vaccines are a biological weapon. As you say, this is the executive committee of the party in Brevard. They haven't hit send on this letter yet, but that vote coming up at 6:30, and I'm told it's fairly likely going to pass. If it does, they're asking state leadership to make it illegal to give or to take MRNN vaccines in Florida. In this 4 page letter, complete with footnotes, Brevard County Republicans cite sources which led them to a stunning conclusion.
Here it is in their own words.
@someonesom47381 - someone somewhere
@redpillb0t https://t.co/fXGAIkzuYC
reSee.it AI Summary
This week, I discussed ten significant stories that the media overlooked. Notably, several U.S. states are drafting bills to ban mRNA COVID-19 injections, driven by concerns from over 81,000 medical professionals and evidence of harm. I highlighted Bill Maher's critique of the NFL's "End Racism" message, Elon Musk's findings on Medicare waste, and Joe Rogan's blunt remarks on vaccine advocates. Additionally, I covered political tensions within the Democratic Party and Australia's controversial anti-free speech law. Stay tuned for more updates next Sunday.
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
10 Shocking Stories the Media Buried This Week #10 - Legislative efforts to BAN mRNA COVID-19 injections are now underway in several U.S. states. “This platform continuously shows failure—shows harm.” Bills to ban the shots are being drafted and considered in Florida, Texas, South Carolina, Tennessee, Iowa, Idaho, Montana, and Washington State. “The evidence is clear—over 81,000 physicians, scientists, and concerned citizens, 240 elected officials, 17 professional organizations, excess mortality, negative efficacy, and DNA contamination call for the IMMEDIATE removal of COVID-19 ‘vaccines’ from the market. Failure to do so constitutes mass negligent homicide,” Epidemiologist @NicHulscher says. Hulscher will be “directly involved in three of these [ban the shot] initiatives within the next few weeks here, and [he] will be providing undeniable evidence for market withdrawal, including but not limited to the negative efficacy, DNA contamination, and excess mortality data to these lawmakers.” He predicts, “I think these bills eventually—and all these initiatives—will end up reaching a critical mass. And what that means is it’ll reach a certain point where the federal government will have to respond. They will have to follow suit with the states and finally get these off the market.” Get the full breakdown in our exclusive interview. Follow @NicHulscher for more breaking news and analysis on the COVID-19 injections. (See 9 More Revealing Stories Below)
Video Transcript AI Summary
We have great news! Legislative efforts are underway in multiple US states to ban dangerous mRNA COVID-19 injections. Washington, Montana, Idaho, Iowa, Tennessee, South Carolina, Florida, and Texas are among the states considering bans at various government levels. A peer-reviewed study, supported by over 81,000 physicians, scientists, and concerned citizens, provides irrefutable evidence for immediate market withdrawal due to negative efficacy, DNA contamination, and excess mortality. This momentum, fueled by persistent truth-seekers, may force federal action. We believe all mRNA gene therapy injections should be banned, given their demonstrated failures and harm, such as in the failed RSV trials. The evidence is clear, and we're optimistic about achieving market removal, starting at the state level and moving to the federal level. Follow updates on my X account (@NickHolscher) and the McCullough Foundation (@McCulloughFund) for more information.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Welcome back to another jam packed week of media blackout and let me tell you ladies and gentlemen, we have some very good news for you this week. Legislative efforts to ban the dangerous COVID-nineteen mRNA injections are now underway across multiple US states with bills being considered, drafted, and supported at various levels of government. Nicholas Hoelscher and Courageous Discourse report to US states with legislative efforts to ban mRNA injections as of 02/06/2025. You can see which states are considering it already with Washington, Montana, Idaho, Iowa, Tennessee, South Carolina, Florida, and Texas. Nicholas Hoelscher says a critical mass will soon be reached forcing the federal government to follow suit.
If you're aware of any states that are missing from this figure, please let me know in the comments. Nicholas Hoelscher also makes reference to this recent peer reviewed study which found irrefutable evidence supporting immediate market withdrawal of the COVID nineteen quote unquote vaccines and you can see over 81,000 physicians, scientists and concerned citizens, two forty elected officials, 17 professional organizations, excess mortality, negative efficacy, and DNA contamination call for urgent action. And so we have the McCullough Foundation study which was authored by epidemiologist Nicholas Holcher, doctor Mary Talley Bowden, doctor Peter McCullough, titled review of calls for market withdrawal of COVID nineteen vaccines intensify risks far outweigh theoretical benefits, and we encourage everyone to read that in full. We also have new study finds COVID vaccinated are sicker than unvaccinated people. Four studies confirm serious health risks associated with childhood vaccination.
So the pressure is clearly mounting and we wanna take a moment to thank all of you, all of our listeners who haven't wavered in the face of adversity and have persisted in their pursuit of the truth, demanding answers where the authorities shamed us. It's because of all of you and the real experts that have continued in this battle that we are now at this point. Nicholas Hoelscher joins us now with more details on what we can expect next. Nicholas Hoelscher, thank you so much for joining us today. We appreciate you being here.
Speaker 1: Thanks for having me.
Speaker 0: Well, this is wonderful news, and many of us have been sort of holding our breath for years waiting for states to have the courage to do this, and now many of them are. Talk to us a little bit about how this all came about.
Speaker 1: Yeah. So, actually, in the past few years, there have been multiple initiatives, multiple bills, multiple committee hearings, and all of this stuff is is actively and has in the past few years been drafted up. It's being considered now by eight states. And within these eight states, like I said, it it this this situation, this this consideration of banning the mRNA injections is being considered at various levels of government, including county level and at the state level. So, for example, Washington state, like, we know they're they're very blue state.
They had 98% vaccine uptake. It's not being considered there at the state level right now, but there are initiatives at the county level. And I wanna say that, personally, I will be directly involved in three of these initiatives, within the next few weeks here, and I will be providing, undeniable evidence for market withdrawal, including but not limited to the negative efficacy, DNA contamination, and excess mortality data, to these lawmakers.
Speaker 0: Well, we have the recent, and we just sort of brushed over this, the recent peer reviewed study that found irrefutable evidence supporting immediate market withdrawal of the COVID nineteen, quote, unquote, vaccines. And there's just again, I'll just say it again over 81,000 physicians, scientists, and concerned citizens, two forty elected officials, 17 professional organizations based on excess mortality, negative efficacy, and DNA contamination, calling for urgent action. And so I have to say, Nicholas, and I've I've I've said this on a recent broadcast. This is absolutely, very much thanks to the work of you, doctor Peter McCullough, and many others out there who haven't given up this fight because really it was the biggest crime I think recorded, you know, even though it hasn't officially been declared a crime, the biggest crime against humanity that we've seen in our lifetimes, perhaps in all of history, and to to mandate an experimental product like this, where it is going to actually cause harm, there's evidence of the harm, death, destruction, disability. It should have been recalled a very long time ago.
What do you think will happen now with mRNA in general once this starts to, really topple the COVID narrative?
Speaker 1: Alright. Well, I think these bills eventually and all these initiatives will end up reaching a critical mass. And what that means is it'll reach a certain point to where the federal government will have to respond. They will have to follow suit with the states and finally get these off the market, if they if the federal government doesn't beforehand before the states. And, hopefully, they do before the states, but, you know, that remains to be seen.
And I think that I think all mRNA technology, should be banned, and some of these bills are actually for all mRNA gene therapy injections, for any infectious disease. And, you know, we know from the mRNA RSV trials, those failed as well. They gave those to little babies, and it increased their risk of RSV. And so this platform continuously continuously shows failure, shows harm, and I think it should be totally banned.
Speaker 0: I absolutely agree with you, and many, many people do. And we genuinely hope to see that this is gonna be the way forward, for for America and for the whole world. I'm, that was actually gonna be one of my questions to you is adjust the COVID mRNA or all mRNA. To hear that is very, very refreshing. I know that there was, there were lawmakers in the state of Tennessee that, required the vaccine lettuce to be listed, not, you know, to have specific listings and ban it actually.
There are other states that have said, well, we need to list if a food has mRNA in it, we need to list it as a drug rather than a food. It should be banned altogether and especially because of the shedding aspect, Nicholas, that's the other thing I've made the point several times that it's not actually about choice because we don't have choice. We can't control who we come into contact with. And so if your choice is removed, you can't possibly have that in circulation. Your final words on that, and please let us know where people can follow your fantastic work.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Well, first, I I I'm hoping that these state level initiatives will finally lead to market removal in at least some of these states, and it will trickle up up to the top level at the federal government. And I'm very I'm very, excited, and I'm very optimistic about this simply because we do have all the evidence. It's all there, and it's and it's clear as day. And you can follow any updates on this on my personal x account at Nick Holscher or on the McCullough Foundation x account at McCullough Fund.
And also please follow us on courageous discourse substack.
Speaker 0: Fantastic. I just wanna bring up your x account at Nick Holscher. Highly recommend people follow Nick, and and also, the McCullough Foundation, just doing incredible work, incredible work. And, of course, that courageous discourse substack, you can also find it at peter mccullough m d dot substack dot com, and and and keep track of this because we can't allow ourselves to lose the momentum around this. I understand that there are a lot of positive things happening around the country, but if we don't stop this very, very dangerous thing that's in circulation, you know, how how can you really fight any battle if you're sick or if you're not here anymore?
And that's what these this, that's what this technology does. And so it has to be banned. And, and we're just very grateful for you. Thank you so much, Nicholas Holcher. Really appreciate your time today.
Speaker 1: Thanks for having me.
Speaker 0: The American food supply is loaded with over 1,000 toxic ingredients banned in Europe. It's no wonder Americans are more overweight and sicker than ever. When you can't trust what's in your food, the solution is simple. Go straight to the source. Good Ranchers works with over 100 American family farms to bring transparently good meat and seafood to your table.
Why is Good Ranchers meat better? The answer can be perfectly summed up in three important points. One, no antibiotics, hormones or seed oils. Because it's local, you can trust the American process. Two, steakhouse quality.
The meat truly tastes better and you won't want to go back. Three, save time and money. All the cuts are pre trimmed, individually packaged and vacuum sealed, which makes meal prep easier than ever. If you're tired of wondering what's in your food, it is time to make the switch. Good Ranchers makes it easy to trust your food again with their high quality, great tasting meat delivered straight to your door.
Subscribe to any box at goodranchers.com/vnn and use promo code vnn to get $25 off and a free gift of chicken breasts, bacon, salmon or ground beef with every order for a year plus free express shipping. Taste the difference for yourself at goodranchers.com/vnn.
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
#9 - Bill Maher Destroys NFL’s “End Racism” Message in One Brutal Takedown
Video Transcript AI Summary
The Democratic party’s problem isn’t its messaging; it’s the message itself. People dislike the message, not the delivery. The Department of Education’s effectiveness is questionable; reading and math scores are lower now than in 1977 when it was created. A Michigan teachers’ union contract allows teachers to be caught drunk four times before facing consequences, and selling drugs once before firing. The NFL’s “End Racism” end zone messages are pointless virtue signaling. These messages don't deter racism and may even antagonize racists. Instead of focusing on race and gender, addressing real issues is key. Virtue signaling, in fact, perpetuates racism.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Bill Maher destroys NFL's end racism message in one brutal takedown. Comedian and political commentator Bill Maher just unleashed three brutal truth bombs on the Democratic party in his latest episode of Real Time. Despite his frequent bursts of Trump derangement syndrome, Maher didn't hold back on his party's flaws. The first truth bomb dropped when Maher told MSNBC's Chris Hayes that the Democratic party's problem this election cycle wasn't getting its message out, It was the message itself. Take a listen.
Speaker 1: What happens in the end of an election is everyone sits through the data and they come up with their perfect you know, their plan based on, well, this worked and with this group, and we got attack here and there. And And what politics about is a certain point is, like, innovation and communication. You gotta come up with new stories and agreements
Speaker 2: and timelines. Ken Martin guy, he said, something I've heard Democrats say a lot. We didn't get our message out. Maybe I'm paraphrasing, but that's it. And I've said this before to Democrats.
No. You did. That's the problem.
Speaker 1: Yeah. You did get your message out, and people don't like the message.
Speaker 0: Maher also conceded that Trump is probably right about scrapping the Department of Education, taking notice that it's not like the kids are getting smarter. Take a listen.
Speaker 3: The public is aware of the mismanagement of the improper payments.
Speaker 2: What about the the Department of Education? Now, I I don't know that much about it, but I've never read good things. Rahm Emanuel, who I agree with on almost everything, here was a quote. He said, a third of eighth graders can't read, and now he wants to close the department. And I thought, that's probably why they can't read.
Or at least partly.
Speaker 1: I mean, it keep the the numbers keep getting worse and worse and worse.
Speaker 2: And I don't know if the Department of Education is anything, but I mean, it doesn't really I don't know what it does, except take money. It's sort of a middleman. It doesn't, like, run classrooms or do stuff like that. I don't think it makes policy. So where are you on something like that?
Speaker 3: I think that the the Department of Education has to essentially be closed. A lot of the authorities gotta get sent back to the states. The dollars we appropriate actually need to go directly into the hands of parents so that they can use those resources in their states and in their communities to find the best outcome for their children. When the Department of Ed was created in 1977, our reading scores and math scores for kids fourth and eighth grade were higher than they are today. No.
So it's not worked.
Speaker 2: I mean, I read this. I'm stealing this from Neli Bowles column, but in the the Michigan, the the contract from the teachers union says, you cannot be fired for getting caught drunk as a teacher until you do it for a fifth time.
Speaker 1: What?
Speaker 2: Yeah. The first four times, you're good.
Speaker 1: They didn't take the pee heads up now.
Speaker 2: Counseling.
Speaker 1: I will stop drinking when I start the job.
Speaker 2: And also Also, if you're caught selling drugs, twice, that's when we fire you. The first time, you're good.
Speaker 1: That's insane.
Speaker 2: I mean, it is it is insane.
Speaker 1: Yeah. It is. So it's not like
Speaker 2: there isn't insanity that has to be addressed, and it's not like the kids are getting smarter.
Speaker 0: Congressman Byron Donald Florida added, when the Department of Ed was created in 1977, our reading scores and math scores for kids in fourth and eighth grade were higher than they are today. Ma then cited a stunning fact from a Neli Bowles column revealing that in Michigan, one teachers union contract states a teacher cannot be fired for being caught drunk on the job until it happens a fifth time. Yeah. The first four times you're good, Ma responded with disgust. He added also if you're caught selling drugs twice, that's when we fire you.
The first time you're good, Ma quipped, shaking his head, it's insane and it is insane. The moment of the night dropped when Ma stunned Puck News reporter Tara Palmeri telling her the quote, end racism messages in NFL end zones, which are being removed for the Super Bowl, do nothing to end racism. Palmeri caught off guard scrambled for a coherent counter argument, but it fell flat when Maher delivered a reality check on what the end racism messages actually accomplish. Take a look.
Speaker 2: Yeah. I noticed that at the Super Bowl, they're for the first time in, I think, four years now, the Trump administration is making them take away end racism, which they had written in the end zone. Right?
Speaker 1: And when
Speaker 2: I Why?
Speaker 1: It just seems silly.
Speaker 2: I mean To do it or not to do it?
Speaker 1: Why get rid of it?
Speaker 2: Oh, I could tell you why.
Speaker 1: I know, but it's just like
Speaker 2: because it was stupid to begin with. Yeah.
Speaker 1: But it
Speaker 2: Let me ask you, who's it for? And if you if you're a racist and you see end racism in the end zone, you're gonna stop being a racist? I'm
Speaker 1: sorry. But the sentiment is basically, like, don't be an asshole.
Speaker 2: But but but I think it's an asshole to nag us during a football game about something that doesn't change anything or any if I'm not a racist and I see it, it doesn't matter. And if I am a racist, it can make me more of a racist.
Speaker 3: Look. I think if you write don't be an asshole in the end zone, everybody will agree with that.
Speaker 1: The problem is we all think the other guys have asked. No. And no one thinks they're a risk.
Speaker 0: Well, this moment shattered the party's playbook of turning everything into a race or gender issue to claim the moral high ground. But Maher tore it apart exposing the ugly truth. Virtue signaling doesn't end racism. If anything, it makes it worse. Ex user Jordan M Thomas said it best, virtue signalling doesn't end racism, it perpetuates it.
Few statements ring true than that.
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
#8 - Elon Musk Says His DOGE Team Uncovered $100 BILLION in Medicare and Medicaid Waste After Gaining Access to the System
Video Transcript AI Summary
My team at the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) uncovered $100 billion in wasted Medicare and Medicaid funds. Working with two senior CMS veterans, we had read-only access to their payment and contracting systems. Our mission was to find ways to use resources more effectively, but we discovered massive waste and potential fraud. CMS processes over a billion Medicare claims annually and manages billions in Medicaid funds. They recently suspended 850 agents for suspected fraud. The Department of Justice has also been prosecuting healthcare fraud cases, with billions of dollars in losses. This discovery highlights a massive scandal, potentially the biggest in US history, and is prompting calls for similar transparency initiatives in other countries. We need major reform, absolute transparency over tax spending, and human oversight to ensure this doesn't happen again.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Musk says his Doge team uncovered 100,000,000,000 in Medicare and Medicaid waste after gaining access to the system. In a bombshell revelation that could shake the foundations of American health care, Elon Musk leading the charge under president Trump's newly minted Department of Government Efficiency or DOGE, has uncovered what he describes as a staggering 100,000,000,000 of taxpayer money wasted by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services or CMS. On Wednesday, Musk's team, along with two senior veterans from the agency, has been meticulously reviewing the CMS's payment and contracting systems, which are crucial for managing health insurance for approximately one in every four Americans, according to Far Left USA Today. CMS has two senior agency veterans, one focused on policy and one focused on operations, who were leading the collaboration with Doge, including ensuring appropriate access to CMS systems and technology, the agency said in a statement to Reuters. The Doge team was granted read only access to the system.
Their mission, as outlined by Andrew G Nixon, the HHS Director of Communications, is to identify, quote, opportunities for more effective and efficient use of resources in alignment with President Trump's efficiency agenda. However, the narrative has quickly escalated from efficiency to accusations of rampant waste and potential fraud. This is where the big money fraud is happening, Musk tweeted on Wednesday in response to a post suggesting that aids using Doge are searching the Medicare agency payment systems for fraud. However, the most explosive claim came later on Thursday night when Musk tweeted, quote, they wasted $100,000,000,000 of taxpayer money. What was he talking about?
Well, this revelation comes as CMS processes over 1,000,000,000 Medicare claims annually, oversees health care quality through hospital and nursing home inspections, and disperses billions in matching funds to states for Medicaid programs. Now Medicare covers currently about 68,000,000 Americans, primarily those 65 and individuals with disabilities, while Medicaid serves approximately 73,000,000 low income citizens. According to the CMS, from June 24 through October 24, CMS suspended 850 agents and brokers marketplace agreements for reasonable suspicion of fraudulent or abusive conduct related to unauthorized enrollments or unauthorized plan switches. These agents and brokers are now prohibited from participating in marketplace enrollment, including receiving related commissions. The Department of Justice has also been active in combating health care fraud.
In recent years, the average loss associated with the schemes prosecuted by the Health Care Fraud Unit has steadily risen. In June of twenty four, the Department of Justice announced charges against 193 defendants, including 76 medical professionals for their alleged involvement in fraudulent schemes amounting to approximately 2,750,000,000.00 in false claims. Since 02/2007, the Healthcare Fraud Unit has charged more than 5,400 defendants with fraudulently billing Medicare, Medicaid and private health insurers more than £27,000,000,000 Doge from its inception was hyped to come in and decimate the scandalous spending and total misappropriation of taxpayer funds and Elon Musk and his team have come in and lived up to all of those expectations and in many ways far exceeded them. Now, while some may be questioning the tactics employed, the results really cannot be questioned. What we've seen in the initial period of the Trump administration and the newly formed Doge department is nothing short of mind boggling.
The absolute web of NGOs initiatives that do not benefit Americans or anyone really could only be described as the biggest scandal potentially in US history. The evidence of complete theft committed against the American people is on display for the world to see. And what this is achieving as a byproduct is other countries asking for the same transparency. In fact, the opposition leader in Australia, Peter Dutton, running for prime minister this year, has put a similar initiative on the table. Now, while Australia has its own problems and we'll get into that a bit later in the broadcast and certainly Peter Dutton is one of those problems, there is no doubt in anyone's mind that a department the likes of Doge is long overdue.
When reflecting on the amount of taxes that populations pay versus population numbers in the workforce, versus taxes upon taxes on products and services, it's absolutely endless and countries like The US, Australia, Canada, The UK should be in a position where virtually every citizen is wealthy and the country is absolutely immaculate in its entirety. Doge has uncovered why it is not. The one thing we should expect now is major reform, absolute transparency over tax and total reform around it, and you can be sure that there will be a microscope on every tax dollar spent and government initiative going forward. The most important aspect to this reform, however, needs to be a populist that is completely informed about the way forward and about the systems and processes being implemented, and ultimately, the people need to have assurance that all of this will have total and absolute human oversight.
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
#7 - Democrat Who’s Already Trying to Impeach Trump Gets ROASTED on Live TV by C-SPAN Caller
Video Transcript AI Summary
Representative Al Green's push to impeach President Trump again is facing criticism. Some believe his actions are merely a fundraising ploy to garner far-left support. A C-SPAN caller lambasted Green and the Democrats, citing hypocrisy regarding Elon Musk, USAID, and alleged Democrat corruption. The caller stated that Democrats only focus on impeachment, race, and gender issues, neglecting the needs of the American people.
I acknowledge concerns about rapid societal changes and lack of transparency, but these issues don't justify resorting to the same tactics employed by those in power. We must maintain integrity and fairness, even when dealing with corrupt systems. While protests and discussions are valid forms of dissent, it’s crucial to evaluate arguments critically. America's current period of change requires careful consideration and a commitment to fairness.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Democrat who's already trying to impeach Trump gets roasted on live TV by a C SPAN caller. The article says rep Al Green is the Texas Democrat who's already trying to impeach Trump again. There is a distinct possibility that Green is not even serious about this. He may just be trying to increase support from the far left for fundraising purposes. Either way, it's completely stupid and the public is sick of this.
Green appeared on C SPAN this morning and a caller made a total fall out of him on live television. The caller also got into the Democrat hypocrisy over Elon Musk, Doge and USAID. We're gonna play this clip so you get a bit of context as well as the caller's words. Take a listen.
Speaker 1: And I would add this. The president should be impeached. I said that on the floor of the house. He should be impeached, but I'm not saying that it would be necessarily for what happened in Gaza. There's a target rich environment.
There are many things that may be, placed in this or these articles of impeachment, but he it should be because he's unfit to be president. Unfit. And when these impeachment signs start going up around the country, when people see these signs, I assure you the pressure pressure is gonna be on Congress to do something. Impeachment doesn't mean that he will be removed from office, but it will say to the country that we this is what we stand for. There's it's been said that, the protests don't have a plan.
Well, the plan is here. This is the plan. Protest, complain now, impeach later.
Speaker 0: Let's get to calls because the lines have lit up. Richard in Savannah, Georgia, Republican. You're up first, Richard.
Speaker 2: Thank you. I watched you yesterday with the Democrat party out, protesting everything that Elon Musk is trying to do for the American people. The the USAD is a 100% of money laundering scheme around the world kickbacks back to the Democrat party, whether it's, through the Clinton Foundation in Haiti, Four Point Four Billion And Eighty Four Million Dollars went to her daughter, Chelsea Clinton. All y'all have is, impeachment and race and gender, etcetera, and you actually do nothing for the people of America today. I think the Democrats should sit back and let America see what it's like to reduce the people in government to wasteful spending.
And all y'all can do is is just complain and be negative, and we're sick of it. And also
Speaker 0: Richard, let's let's let's have the congressman The article finishes with quote, Democrats have nothing left but rage. This move by Green is ridiculous and completely ignores the outcome of the twenty twenty four election. Every time you think Democrats might have learned a lesson, they prove they haven't. End quote. Now, this is what I'll say on this and don't shoot me for being balanced, because I do see the fear of change and some of the points some people on the left are making.
There are many rapid changes occurring that in many cases have not afforded the people with complete transparency. Locking people out of systems, locking people out of buildings, whilst may be justified due to an ongoing investigation, can all be very distressing and not all of the affected workers are bad people. They're essentially cogs inside an extremely corrupt machine. Sometimes, those extremely corrupt machines require an extreme approach. Now, whilst they may claim this is evidence of a dictatorship, the fact that they're still able to have these discussions, protests, movements is evidence that the dictatorship they were so afraid of is in fact still the quote unquote democracy they were afraid of losing.
They have the right to challenge power and we all have the right to point out which of their arguments have merit or sound ridiculous. America is in a period of change and I don't think we should behave like the left does in cancelling anyone's opinions that are contrary to those in power. We need to be cautious to not implement the same tactics they used against us against them. If we do, we become hypocrites. They may have set a precedent.
However, in all things going forward, absolute and total integrity and fairness, albeit applied ruthlessly, must be the charter. This is after all what conservatives actually stand for. How well do you sleep at night? Real peace of mind comes from knowing your family is prepared for tough times. My Patriot Supply, America's most trusted name in emergency preparedness, is offering a limited time discount on their supersized mega three month emergency food kit.
This isn't your typical survival food. Each kit provides over 2,500 calories daily for ninety days with delicious meals and extras including chicken, beef, fruits and veggies. We're talking quality meals that last up to twenty five years in storage and still taste like home cooked. The pandemic taught us how quickly store shelves can empty. Don't wait for the next crisis.
Your Mega Emergency Food Kit includes free shipping, a disaster replacement warranty, and 20 fourseven USA based support. This special discount is available for this week only, so visit preparewithvnn.com now to secure your family's future with a $250 discount. If you order by 3PM, they'll ship your order the same day, so you have peace of mind right away. Go to preparewithvnn.com.
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
#6 - Bill Gates Issues Chilling New Threat to Trump, Musk & America
Video Transcript AI Summary
On *The View*, I expressed concern about the Trump administration's impact on USAID, a partner of my foundation in crucial health initiatives like vaccine distribution and nutrition programs. I emphasized the importance of this work, highlighting the potential for millions of deaths if disrupted. I also voiced worry regarding Elon Musk's political influence, noting a lack of understanding of existing programs among some private sector individuals entering government. My comments regarding a future pandemic, suggesting a 10% chance within four years, stemmed from monitoring concerning pathogens. The suggestion that this was a threat to the Trump administration is inaccurate; my focus remains on effective global health initiatives.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Bill Gates issues a chilling new threat to Trump, Musk, and America. Billionaire Globalist Bill Gates joined The View on Tuesday to cry about the Trump administration's doge exposing corruption within the United States Agency for International Development or USAID and to fear monger about the threat of a new pandemic far more severe than COVID. Gates, who has enjoyed massive worldwide political influence over the past several decades, complained that Elon Musk's position in the Trump White House is insane and admitted he's a little worried particularly with the MAGA movement taking down USAID. Let's take a listen.
Speaker 1: Mister Gates, you also called Elon Musk's political influence abroad, quote, insane, along with another word we can't repeat here. But what's your take on his political access and influence here in America right now?
Speaker 2: Well, Elon, his private sector work, you know, has been very innovative, really fantastic. A lot of private sector people, when they get into government, they don't take the time necessarily to see what the good work is or why it's structured the way it is. So I I'm a little worried, particularly with this USAID stuff. Mhmm. My foundation partners with USAID on nutrition and, getting vaccines out.
You know, there's incredible people. You know, they're not actually worms, that work there. Yeah. So, you know, hopefully, we'll get some of that work back in shape. In fact, if we don't, you know, you could have, literally millions of deaths.
So Yeah. You know, with the aid, people think, you know, wow. How much do we give these countries? As you said, it's it's less than a percent. People think it's 5%, and it should be 2%, but it's actually under 1%.
Speaker 0: Wow. Well, Billy Boy, the fact that your organization partners with USAID to deliver vaccines, which by the way have caused infertility in Africa and outbreaks all over the place because they're not actually vaccines, they're weapons, tells us everything that we need to know. And again, referring to a hypothetical impending global pandemic, Gates told the show host, oh certainly, we'll have one in the next twenty five years. There's even some pathogens out there that we're watching over right now. So maybe ten percent chance in the next four years.
With it now being public knowledge that USAID and Gates were directly involved in engineering the COVID-nineteen bioweapon released from the infamous Wuhan China BioLab, it appears as if the Microsoft co founder just issued a threat to the Trump administration by suggesting another deadly pandemic will soon take place if his operations are blocked from receiving hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars. During another portion of his View appearance, Gates expressed hope that the transition into the Trump administration doesn't interrupt his work on global health. The The article says this interview signals a last ditch effort to propagandize Americans ahead of the next globalist scheme to sabotage the Trump administration. And perhaps, Bill Gates meeting with Trump wasn't exactly what Gates told us it was.
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
While you’re here, don’t forget to follow (@VigilantFox) and hit the bell 🔔 for more weekly news roundups.
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
#5 - Insider: Level of Democrat Panic Over Musk Freezing USAID “Unlike Anything Ever Seen”
Video Transcript AI Summary
A Democratic Party insider revealed extreme panic within the party regarding President Trump and Elon Musk's actions freezing USAID spending. This is described as a "killing blow" to the "deep state," impacting the Democrats' political influence and funding schemes. The insider stated that dismantling USAID is Trump's biggest political victory, crippling their "golden goose." Democrats plan to hide partisan funding under seemingly legitimate initiatives and utilize NGOs as intermediaries to circumvent oversight. To truly succeed, Trump and Musk need to completely shut down USAID or fire its staff, as the agency is overwhelmingly comprised of Democrats. The public outcry highlights the Democrats' concern about exposure of their spending. One Congressman even called for Musk's firing.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: An insider says level of Democrat panic over Musk freezing USAID is unlike anything ever seen. Very interesting. A Democratic Party insider says that the level of panic over President Trump and Elon Musk's Musk's Doge freezing all USAID spending is unlike anything he's ever seen. The source described the development as a killing blow to the heart of the deep state. Let's go to the thread.
From Aesthetica on x 30,000,000 views on this ladies and gentlemen. Talked to a friend who has connections within the Democratic Party and he said the level of panic over Trump and Elon shutting down USAID is unlike anything he's ever seen. By following the money, Doge has struck a killing blow to the heart of the Democrat Deep State Machine. It goes on with a direct quote, this is worse than nineeleven for Democrats. USAID is the primary vessel they use to achieve their political agenda.
USAID is and always has been the primary source of funding for their influence peddling schemes and for their indirect sources of income and we've certainly seen that revealed over the past week. Another text quote, based on the reactions from within the party, it seems to me that dismantling USAID is Trump's biggest political victory to date. It was his enemy's golden goose. Same source who told me during the campaign, well before it was made public, that Kamala's internal polling had her behind Trump. So his information is good, Esthetica says.
Another important addition, he said initial plans by the Democrats is to have their people at USAID hide the partisan funding under the, unimpeachable initiatives. They will push back really hard on certain line items that on their face look like reasonable USAID expenditures and hide their political spending under these programs. Elon Musk looks like the whole thing needs to be thrown out to avoid this from happening. Furthermore, another likely solution for Democrats, which they already use to reward VIPs, is to use NGOs as an intermediary to direct funds where they want them to go. So basically USAID allocates funds for certain initiative or, for a certain initiative rather that looks reasonable.
Democrat friendly NGO is contracted to carry out initiative. NGO number one subcontracts VIP, which is another NGO owned or operated by a political ally or Democrat politician, and eventually the funds reach the secret intended target, and the original problem is not solved. This means they can continue to rinse and repeat this grift. The final text is quoted as if Trump slash Elon want this to stick, they need to completely shut down USAID or fire the entire staff. The party has instructed their allies to not make waves and blend in.
USAID is 99% Democrats. They will not be able to save it without risking internal sabotage. So just a few comments from people on x. Democrats are positively apoplectic about Trump authorizing Musk and Doge to investigate where on earth all this USAID money is going. They keep on coming out of the woodwork.
Congressman Greg Casar says, fire Elon Musk. Use every legislative, judicial, and public pressure tactic at our disposal until we get it done. Someone responds, Democrats are really panicking at the thought of the public finding out where their money has been going. Another person responds to him saying, I thought you were against firing government workers. Why are they so worried about wasteful spending being rectified?
Someone says, why don't you wanna cut out useless spending like funding Sesame Street in Iran? Mind you, I think it was Iraq, but either way, why would you not wanna stop that? Because, Raw egg Nationalist says USAID turns out to be the greatest slush fund the world has ever seen. We're talking about subversion on a global scale, the global homo war chest.
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
#4 - Joe Rogan Issues Blunt Message to COVID Jab Pushers
Video Transcript AI Summary
I'm sharing a blunt message for those who pushed COVID shots and haven't admitted mistakes. A doctor I know almost lost their license for prescribing ivermectin. It's concerning when doctors still recommend COVID shots without acknowledging changing perspectives. This applies to social media influencers too—those who haven't publicly corrected their stance lack integrity. Even if they *have* admitted being wrong, skepticism remains warranted; being fooled once means you're susceptible again. Critical thinking is key.
This also relates to a serious issue: home title theft. Criminals can steal your home title, leaving you financially ruined. Protect yourself with HomeTitleLock.com/vnn. Use promo code VNN for a free title scan and 30 days of free triple lock protection—24/7 monitoring, alerts, and title restoration. Secure your most valuable asset today.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Joe Rogan issues a blunt message to COVID jab pushers. He actually goes there, issuing a blunt message for those who push the COVID shots and won't own their mistakes. Let's take a listen.
Speaker 1: My doctor, that I know out here won a case, but they were about to lose their license. Yeah. So that's and just for prescribing ivermectin.
Speaker 2: No. That should that should be your first question, doc, is how did you do over COVID? Yeah. And, if they have nothing interesting to say, I would just turn around and walk out the door.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Imagine going to a doctor right now, and they're telling you you should get your COVID shots. You should stay up to date.
Speaker 2: Imagine. Well, I find that bad, but at least I know how to interpret that. What I don't understand is what I'm supposed to do with the doctor who did recommend the shots has stopped recommending them and has not Talked about it. Said something about the change in their perspective.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah. I have a problem with that with social media influencers too.
Speaker 2: %.
Speaker 1: People that were pushing it and then have not publicly correct the course have not said I was wrong, and this is why I was wrong. Like, I can't fuck with you anymore. If you if you can't say that you were wrong about that, then I don't I just can't.
Speaker 0: We've linked that full Rogan episode on the Vigilant News Network article for anyone who'd like to see it. Now, ultimately, if people haven't owned their mistakes, this is essentially where cancel culture has organically applied because the public decided these people don't have any integrity. If they have owned their mistakes, I think we should still be skeptical if I'm honest. Learning you were fooled too late means you could be fooled again. You are a person who is susceptible to propaganda.
Until you prove that you are fully aware of how this game works and employ critical thinking tactics at every stage, you still have a question mark over your head. Now, the FBI calls it house stealing and you've probably heard about this devastating crime on the news, because it is a big problem. Scammers can transfer your home title, take out loans in your name, and leave you with nothing but a financial and emotional disaster. If you own a home or any real estate, it is crucial you protect your property and equity from these criminals, and there's no better way I know of than hometitlelock.com/vnn. If you haven't checked it out before, now is the time.
We've arranged for our listeners to get a free title scan to check if your home is still in your name, plus thirty days of free home title locks triple lock protection. That's twenty four seven monitoring of your title, urgent alerts if anything has changed, and most importantly, restoration of your title. If there's ever any fraud, you will immediately be protected and will get thirty days free when you use the promo code v n n at sign up. Protect your home, your equity, and your peace of mind today at hometitlelock.com/vnn with promo code VNN. There's no better time to secure your most valuable asset.
Visit hometitlelock.com/vnn today.
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
#3 - John Fetterman admits the Democratic party has a serious white male problem. If he’s right that the damage is beyond repair, then the Democratic party is officially on the brink of collapse.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Senator John Fetterman discussed the Democratic Party's struggles in a recent interview. He acknowledged Attorney General Pam Bondi's qualifications, despite disagreeing with her politically, highlighting the need for pragmatism over ideological purity. He commented on Trump's Gaza proposal, calling it provocative but prompting necessary conversations about the humanitarian crisis resulting from the destruction.
Fetterman attributed the party's declining popularity to its tactics of shaming and scolding voters, particularly calling Trump supporters names like "fascists" and "dopes." He expressed deep concern over the alienation of white men, stating that repairing that fractured relationship may be impossible. He noted this demographic's significant electoral weight and the concerning trend of young men switching to the Republican party. He warned that unless the Democrats change course, they face a prolonged period out of power.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: John Fetterman admits what no Democrat wants to say. Senator John Fetterman just opened up about the Democratic party's woes in a thirteen minute conversation with Puck News Tara Palmeri, detailing its self inflicted wounds and warning that the damage may be beyond repair. The conversation started with the confirmation of attorney general Pam Bondi to which Fetterman admitted she was qualified for the job as the only Democrat who voted for her in the process. Quote, she was the attorney general of the third largest state, Florida, in the nation, and she was a DA for seventeen, eighteen years. So in terms of qualifications, she absolutely was a serious person.
He says, and in her politics and other issues, I wouldn't agree with those things. So if everything is a no or everything is a freak out, if you refuse or demand purity in every interaction, then you're never gonna get anything done, Fetterman said. Again, very balanced approach, very surprising from Fetterman. The discussion then shifted to Trump and his plans for Gaza, which Fetterman admitted might not be such a crazy proposal after all. Fetterman called Trump's idea provocative, but said it forces a very more honest conversation of Gaza.
With 90% of the housing destroyed or severely damaged, he asked, where are you gonna live? What are folks gonna do? He pointed out that Gaza has no utilities, no water, no kinds of structures. Just add here that a lot of people were canceled for saying this previously, because the claim was that they still had all their utilities, but I digress. How can you live in just a destroyed war zone?
Fetterman asked. Where are you gonna live, and if you don't have electricity, what about sanitation and those kinds of things and other basic services? As for claims that Trump's plan is a real estate grab, Fetterman shut that down. He said, I don't personally believe that they're gonna turn Gaza into a Trump Plaza kind of situation. Next came the burning question.
Why are voters abandoning the Democratic party? Fetterman blamed the party's shaming and scolding, including calling Trump supporters fascists and dopes. He argued that this name calling has caused them to lose the argument and more importantly voters. Let's take a listen to this clip. Why is the Democratic party viewed as toxic by so many?
Like, even people inside the party acknowledge that.
Speaker 1: I think their their primary currency was shaming and scolding and and and talking down to people and telling them, hey. I know better than you, or you're dopes, or you're a bro, or you're ignorant, or, you know, don't don't you you know, how can you be this dumb? I can't imagine it. Like, and then, by the way, they're they're fascists. How can you vote for that?
And, you know, when you're in a state like Pennsylvania, like, I know and I love people that voted for Trump, and they're not fascists. You know, they they they don't support, insurrection and those things. And, and, you know, if you go to an extreme and you become a boutique kind of a, of a proposition, then you're you're gonna lose the you're gonna lose the argument, and and then we have done that.
Speaker 0: Then the bombshell dropped when Fetterman admitted the Democratic party had fractured its relationship with white men so severely that he's not sure if it's possible that it can be repaired. Take a listen. How do Democrats win back white men like yourself?
Speaker 1: I don't know. And and, truthfully, I'm not sure I'm not sure if that's possible, to be honest. I I think that's been seriously eroding for for a while, and and in some cases, in in the conversations I've had, a lot of people, they don't even wanna say it publicly, but they just feel like, you know, the other side seems like it's it's like men, well, that men's the problem. Men are to blame, or their their masculinity is toxic, or if unless you're able to conform to our very strict kinds of definition of what we think's appropriate, well, then, hey. I'm just I'm gonna find an alternative, and they've they've done that.
That's that's that's absolutely true. And and once we've kind of turned their back on that demographic, it's gonna be difficult to to rebuild and replace that with with, with those voters because I think that migration has been ongoing, phenomenon for for several years, and that was been in front and center, you know, in part of the election in in '24.
Speaker 0: The article goes on to say this is actually devastating because white men comprise 34% of the total electorate in the twenty twenty four US presidential election. And when you account for the fact that a large chunk of young men aged between 18 to 29 flipped from Democrat to Republican in just one election cycle, the situation looks even more bleak for the Democrats. If they stay on the path of alienating men, the trend of young men flipping sides will continue keeping the Democratic Party out of the White House for years to come. You can see here that Americans under the age of 30 voted for Harris by four points, 50% Harris, forty six % Trump. Though young men and women diverged dramatically with men 30 voting for Trump by 16 points, 41% Harris, fifty seven % Trump, and women 30 voting for Harris by 24 points, 59% Harris and 35% Trump.
Now, instead of heeding Fetterman's warning, Democrats have doubled down blaming racism and misogyny for their crushing defeat and really it's just not a winning strategy and everyone can see it and they really need to, wake up to themselves. You can see the full conversation link there below.
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
#2 - Australia’s political establishment rams through the most dangerous anti-free speech law in the nation’s history.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Australia recently passed a sweeping hate speech law with minimal debate, sparking widespread concerns about free speech. The law's justification centers on combating antisemitism, despite a lack of concrete evidence linking alleged attacks to perpetrators or clear motives. Critics argue the law is overly broad, potentially criminalizing religious teachings and silencing dissent. The shift from requiring intent to incite violence to merely being "reckless" raises serious concerns about potential misuse and arbitrary enforcement. The law carries mandatory jail sentences, even for unintentional breaches. This rapid passage and its implications for free speech are alarming, and similar legislation based on the IHRA definition of antisemitism is being considered globally, raising concerns about the erosion of fundamental rights in other countries, including the US. We urge you to pay attention to this pattern of events.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Now, our next story about what just happened in Australia is important for the whole world to understand, including America, because the reasons or justification for why it was done are being discussed in many countries. Let me explain. Australia has just passed a hate speech law that has sent a chilling effect across the nation. Many Australians are now reporting a fear of posting absolutely any opinions online because they could be put in prison for doing so. This bill is actually worse than what we saw in recent times in The UK.
This anti free speech bill was introduced under the guise of stopping quote anti Semitism. It is important to note that Australia has experienced some alleged attacks on Jewish establishments and buildings and I say alleged only because, and this is very important to note, to the best of our research, barely any perpetrators despite millions of dollars to police task forces and grants to the Jewish community have actually been identified. Many feel absolute clarity over motives and evidence have not been provided. What we have seen is a lot of conjecture from the media, politicians, and police. However, much of the evidence that has been reported has left a lot to be desired.
They claimed they may be foreign influence groups contributing to this. Again, no sound evidence, but this could be attributed to ongoing investigations, of course. One pertinent example is from the 12/06/2024. The Adas Israel Synagogue of Melbourne experienced a fire. With minimal investigation having taken place, the government almost immediately declared it a terrorist attack.
Two people were reportedly seen on camera, however, no terrorist has been found. To this day, by the way, as at the time of this recording, and we'll show you on Google, that the investigation is still ongoing. No concrete evidence has been given to justify that this was a terrorist attack, but there was a strange interview that emerged with a reported attendee of the synagogue who reportedly called the police, ran away from them when they arrived at the scene, very odd behavior given usually the person who calls the police is generally grateful to see them and eager to work with them, and had burn marks on his hands which he said were a result of the police apparently letting him run into the burning building to retrieve his cell phone while it was on fire. The government immediately at the time used this as an opportunity to introduce the idea of sweeping speech laws which they said were needed due to anti Semitism and terrorism regardless of the fact that investigations were still open and the Australian people were not given any evidence to support that their speech now needed to be restricted due to terrorism where a terrorist has yet to be identified and have been provided no certainty as to why their freedoms must be infringed upon.
Let me repeat. At that time, and now to the best of our knowledge and research, no perpetrator court, no charges laid, no court case, no conviction. Now we're not saying these attacks were not anti semitic in nature, but that's because we don't know, and that is the exact point, we just don't know. The people need evidence of perpetrators, motives, plans, etc, and even if they were anti semitic, there are already laws in place to protect people from crimes of this nature. The reality is, these laws appear to be simply about restricting speech.
So George Christensen, former politician, writes the war on free speech has begun. Some may say it's an absolute death blow to free speech. They did it in just a matter of days without scrutiny, without real debate, and without a single care for the consequences, Australia's political establishment has rammed through the most dangerous anti free speech law in our nation's history. He says, make no mistake, this is not about stopping terrorism. It's not about protecting people from violence.
This is about silencing dissent, crushing conservative and Christian voices, and weaponizing the law against anyone who dares to challenge the establishment's agenda. The summary says the Australian government swiftly passed a controversial hate speech law ignoring warnings from legal and religious groups. By the way, it was done with no debate and received assent within one day. This is unheard of how quickly it was implemented. The law shifts from requiring intent to incite violence to merely being quote unquote reckless raising concerns over its potential misuse.
Christian schools fear religious teachings could be criminalized, while critics argue the law will silence conservative voices. The bill was backed by both major parties with conservatives accused of enabling its harsh provisions and free speech advocates are warning of increasing authoritarianism and urge Australians to resist and push for the law's repeal. So a particular Sky News commentator actually called out just how extreme the law is under the new legislation. A person can face jail time for simply being reckless with their words. Who defines reckless?
No one really knows. Previously, incitement laws required intent. You had to actually mean to cause harm but not anymore. The law has changed now from intentionally urges to merely advocates violence and intent has been replaced with recklessness, meaning that you don't even have to mean it, you just have to be careless enough that someone thinks it could, maybe, potentially, somewhat could be leading to violence. You could say something perhaps jokingly, not meaning that it will happen, but if you are reckless to the fact that it could happen, you could, you now have by the law incited violence.
A Senator Gerard Renick who we've had on this broadcast before condemned the bill as a direct attack on free speech warning that it threatens freedom of speech by allowing the government to censor or punish individuals for expressing opinions that might be deemed offensive and he pointed out that such laws are always applied selectively, noting that instead of combating hate, these laws can be weaponized to silence dissent and suppress unpopular viewpoints, ultimately undermining democratic values and individual liberties. On the impact of Christian schools, Vanessa Chang from the Australian Association of Christian Schools says, there is a real risk that the broad definitions and expanded list of attributes could criminalize religious teachings on sex or gender which could be considered hateful or harmful by some people. Consider that. Christian schools going to prison, teachers, students. I don't know how far does this spread.
Christian Schools Australia raised similar concerns saying CSA calls on the parliament to consider the unintended consequences of this bill, specifically, the possible criminalization of religious speech such as our Biblical teachings on sex and gender within our schools. This should terrify anyone who values religious freedom, the LGBT agenda is now legally protected, and Christianity is specifically not. Former politician Craig Kelly points out that this is another Trojan horse to suppress free speech, and he's gonna go into some arguments here, but just note that the penalty that they're talking about here for things including political opinions is imprisonment for seven years. Now, listen to how this works. Firstly, it lowers the bar from threatening to use violence to that of threatening to use force.
Secondly, it includes special protections for groups distinguished by political opinions, and thirdly, it removes the good faith defense. So if you engage in commentary about matters of public interest in an honest attempt to point out what you believe are errors in government policy or to try and achieve democratic changes in law, that's no longer a lawful exception. No. In fact, it can land you in prison, and fourthly, it makes a jail sentence mandatory. So even in the most innocent of cases where it's a mere technical breach of the law, the courts can't give you warning, they must sentence you to jail.
He's given a very important example here. So if you now say something like, quote, we must fight against the totalitarian aims of the Marxists that have infiltrated our bureaucracies and want to sense a free speech, sell us out to the globalists, and force Australians to undergo compulsory medical interventions, end quote. He says, by saying we must fight, it could easily be deemed as threatening force and as Marxists are a group distinguished by political opinion and because you could then argue that by allowing free speech threatens the peace, order and good government, exactly the argument they successfully used during COVID, he says, I'd then be guilty of an offence under this act for engaging in hate speech and the courts would be forced to jail me for seven years. George Christensen in his article says, quote, if you thought this was just about stopping terrorism, think again. Teal MP Allegra Spender backed the bill on the basis that we needed to criminalize banners that read, quote, destroy pedo freaks, end quote.
Yes, really. She argued that people who hold up signs opposing pedophiles should be punished under hate speech laws. What does that tell you? Who exactly are they trying to protect here? This is the same political class that calls conservatives extremists for defending traditional values, yet wants to make it illegal to call out pedophiles.
That's from George there. Now, by the definition of this bill, the government could pretend that this very report presenting you with mere facts is hateful by God knows what definition. I suppose the one that seeks to protect pedophiles. Now going back to what I said at the start of this segment, it is very important for people to understand the process of how tyrannical laws pass. An event happens, it shocks the country or the world, then you have people starting to ask questions about the event.
The government says you can't ask questions and furthermore, because you're asking questions, we're going to make asking questions illegal and even better, we're gonna remove your rights in the process including your physical self from society. No dissent on any level will be tolerated and somehow, someway, they always find a way to ensure Christians' rights are affected in the process. The Australian government and governments around the world, including The US, are adopting the International Holocaust Remembrance Association or IHRA definition of antisemitism. Within the IHRA's definition, claiming that Jews killed Jesus is an implied crime. Even though our holy book says this, the IHRA's definition seems to be weaving its way into every country.
The reason why this story matters to every country is because every single government, including The US, is utilizing this definition of antisemitism and looking to enact similar laws and punishments. We call on all political leaders to please take notice of what's at stake here in Australia and when it comes to The US, what does all of this entail for the First Amendment? Presently, this story has received minimal attention in The US and furthermore, X has censored a post on the matter. There was a very detailed post posted by CitizenGo on how Australia's hate speech laws are de facto censorship laws and it was taken down by X. I can attest to the fact that there was nothing quote unquote illegal in the post and it was before the official passing of the law and yet X censored it.
Obviously, this is all very breaking, very new, very convoluted, and we will be bringing you more on this, but I'd love to leave people with this. Pay attention to the pattern of events that occurred in Australia to get such a heinous law passed. Scrutinize them in detail and leave no stone unturned as events like this are what politicians, governments, and activist groups will always use to take the opportunity to crush your freedoms. The evidence is in Australia today. It is a new day in America and a new administration in Washington DC.
There is a lot of excitement and optimism about the future, but the reality is there is a lot of work to do, especially when it comes to fixing our broken health care system. The truth is that the forces that are responsible for breaking our health care system aren't going to simply go away. The challenges our system faces won't disappear overnight. Now more than ever, you need to be prepared. That's where the wellness company comes in.
Their doctors are medical professionals that you can trust, and their line of prescription medical kits are the gold standard when it comes to keeping you safe and healthy. Whether it is the medical emergency kit, the contagion kit, or the first aid kit, or the travel kit, these prescription kits contain an assortment of life saving medications and guidebooks to assist in the proper use of these medications. From the flu to strep throat, from COVID to the bird flu, from a trip to the beach to a trip overseas, the Wellness Company has a prescription kit designed to keep you and your family safe. Make America Healthy Again starts at home. Do your part and protect the health of you and your family.
Go to twc.health/blackout today and order. That's twc.health/blackout and use the promo code blackout to save 10%.
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
#1 - Trump’s Gaza Proposal Sparks Fierce Debate: Could It Actually Work? Journalist @RyanMattaMedia joins to discuss.
Video Transcript AI Summary
President Trump's proposal to transform Gaza into a "Middle East Riviera" and relocate its inhabitants has sparked international outrage. Many countries, including Russia, China, Germany, and France, condemn the plan as a violation of international law and a form of ethnic cleansing. Supporters, however, see it as a potential solution for lasting peace in the region. My guest, Ryan Mata, calls the situation an atrocity, citing horrific accounts of civilian casualties and the destruction of Gaza. He also discusses the alleged misuse of USAID funds and its role in undermining third-world governments, highlighting the disappearance of thousands of Guatemalan children. This conflict, presented with significant bias, demands open discussion and the consideration of all perspectives. We must remember the humanity of those affected and their right to self-determination.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Now, we're going to get into another controversial topic and it is controversial, rightly so. This is an article from the New York Post, Trump's Plan to Take Over Gaza, Letters to the Editor Feb seven twenty twenty five. Now, I'm gonna read you what the New York Post says about this. The issue, President Trump proposing The United States transform Gaza into a Middle East Riviera. President Trump's proposal to take over Gaza and transfer its people to Egypt and Jordan cannot be taken seriously.
Not only do Gazans reject it, but securing the strip would require US Soldiers to battle Hamas terrorists in Gaza's underground tunnels. Our focus should be on bringing home Israeli hostages, including six drawl American citizens, American Israeli citizens rather, preventing Hamas from playing any role in post war Gaza and stopping Iran's nuclear weapons program. We also must demand that the world unequivocally condemned the murder, rape, kidnapping, and unbridled barbarity inflicted on Israel on October 7. Now, very important to note that there are many conflicting reports about the official government narrative surrounding that, but we'll discuss that with our upcoming guest and stop vilifying Israel for defending itself against this violence. So I'm gonna read you some of what some people are saying.
Steven Silver says, with four simple words, 'we'll take over Gaza', Trump made the world a safer place deflating the threat of World War three. He says his stunning statement shifted the global discussion of the Israel Gaza conflict from destruction to revitalization. Then we have Carol Campolo. The president's plans call for the removal of Gaza's inhabitants who owe their predicament solely to Hamas. The unintended consequences of October 7 are still unfolding.
Above all, Hamas must not be allowed to return and prepare for another attempt to destroy Israel. Another person says here, Samuel Fraser, President Trump is certainly in his element when it comes to construction, but the politics of rebuilding Gaza after Hamas is defeated are far more complex. Any rebuilding effort must consider the Israelis who were removed from Gaza by their government in 02/2005 and only Gazans who pledged to live in peace with Israel should be allowed to return. Now, what is largely being ignored in a lot of conservative media is that the international community widely condemns Trump's Gaza takeover plan. Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov reaffirmed Russia's support for a two state solution.
China condemned the forced displacement, emphasizing that Palestinians governing Palestine is fundamental for post conflict stability. German foreign minister, Annalena Baerbock, labeled the proposal a breach of international law, stressing that Gaza belongs to the Palestinians. France reiterated its opposition to any forced displacement calling it a serious violation of international law. Other opposition includes UK, Keir Starmer surprisingly, Denmark, Italy, Spain, Ireland, Slovenia, Belgium, Canada, Turkey, Iran, Brazil, and Palestine. US Democratic Senator Chris Van Hollen condemned it as ethnic cleansing by another name.
No doubt, it's clear this idea has sparked intense reactions from all sides. Some view it as a bold revolutionary move, one that could shift the region's fate and offer hope for lasting peace. However, many critics argue that such a plan is more of a fantasy than a feasible solution. The logistics of relocating millions of people are incredibly complex and many would argue nobody has the right to do so. The reality is not all Palestinians are Hamas.
In fact, the overwhelming amount are not and not all is as it seems surrounding October 7. That's why, if you live in Israel, if you challenge the official government narrative around it, you can go to prison. Nonetheless, Trump has promised peace. Is this wild proposal simply the beginning of negotiations for peace in the region? Trump is known for throwing his weight around to achieve good outcomes in very difficult negotiation situations.
Time will tell, but what is evident is that Gaza is, in its current state, virtually total rubble and uninhabitable. It will need rebuilding and Trump's plan, at least at face value, offers that, but what's important is that we hear all sides of the story and one that really isn't being considered is how this affects the native people of the land who didn't ask for this. Journalist Ryan Mata joins us to discuss. Ryan Mata, thank you so much for joining us today. We appreciate you being here.
Speaker 1: It's an honor to be here, Maria. Thank you so much for having me.
Speaker 0: It's great to have you. Well, we have a few things we need to discuss today, including your new documentary, which is linked to the USAID exposure. We wanna talk about that or USAID. But first and foremost, I wanted to get your take on this, on Trump's Gaza deal. It's drawn a lot of criticism from people worldwide, many countries condemning the idea.
What are your thoughts on this?
Speaker 1: I think it's an absolute atrocity. I think it's super sad seeing what was done to these people in Gaza. I mean, I had a friend that was part of the UAE military and he was showing me personally, this man, because of the relationship that The UAE has with Israel, they were the only ones that Israel was actually allowing to go in and deliver aid over in Gaza. And he was showing me videos of these, these military soldiers who were carrying in packages of of aid into this, like, halfway blown up building. It was, like, one of the only buildings in the area where they could kinda set up a shop and deliver aid to some of the people in Gaza.
And there was a video of these three little children. One of the girls was four years old, I think, and there was two boys. One of the boys was five. The other boys was seven. The girl was playing with a little make, Barbie that looked like it was from some more like the, the apocalyptic movies.
The barbie was kinda like charred. There was dirt on it. There were dirt on the kids toys. One of them was playing with a Tonka truck and just digging in the sand. They were kind of just being kids, you know?
And then the the next photos I've seen of these kids, the girl had her head blown off. The kid had his head the girl's face was blown half her face was blown off. The one kid's head was completely blown off, and the other kid had, like, a chunk out of his face missing. And the the Israeli soldiers, for no reason whatsoever, at one point decided that they just needed to eliminate those children from the face of the earth. And that's the type of crimes that that we're talking about that's happening over here in Gaza.
And that's the stuff that you're not seeing on the Internet. I saw that personally on this gentleman's cell phone. Now, obviously, he wasn't gonna be able to post it because he's part of the UAE military, but, that's some of the atrocities that are taking place over there that I think the American people should be very well aware of. And, you know, we're we're running these people out of their homeland, for no reason whatsoever just to make this greater Israel project, if you will. And I think it's it's a shame, and I think the history books are gonna write volumes about it.
I think it's unacceptable. And as Americans, we can't let it take place.
Speaker 0: For people who aren't aware of the greater Israel project, this is something that Netanyahu proudly boasted about inside the United Nations prior to, October 7. We also have so many things. I I don't know if people know this, but now in Israel, they've introduced legislation that if you question the official narrative that the government has presented about October 7, you end up in prison. And so whenever laws like that are introduced, and, of course, you know, Americans probably don't know about this, but there were many, many Israelis, including a a very good friend of mine who came on a broadcast with me after October 7 that said this doesn't add up. We have evidence of a military stand down.
I mean, there were clear questions that needed to be asked the Hannibal directive. Israel openly admitting that their Apache helicopters, for goodness sake, took down so many people on October 7. They killed their own people and so and people get really upset when you bring up those facts and now it's illegal to even bring them up in Israel. That really shows you something when something is illegal to discuss, that generally means there's something to hide. And so now we're at the point where, you know, all these, the the worldwide community was talking about the the amount of women and children that were being killed in this quote unquote war, which was really just an all all out assault.
The place is a parking lot. President Trump is right, when he says, you know, there's there's nothing left. I'm glad that we're allowed to say that now, but to tell these people that after they their homes have been destroyed, that their all all their families have been slaughtered, that they just have no choice as to where they live now? I mean, this is unbelievable to me.
Speaker 1: They're war crimes. It's a genocide. It's an ethnic cleansing. Benjamin Netanyahu was bragging about how he needed just to basically turn Gaza into a parking lot, and this was prior to October 7 so that they had nowhere to go home to. This wasn't to this wasn't to save hostages.
This wasn't to, ensure the safety of Israel. This was part of an agenda. This was part of a plan, and it was a plan from before October 7 that it was gonna happen no matter what, obviously. Benjamin Netanyahu was hell bent on it.
Speaker 0: Well, there's also the matter of for for one year before October 7, he was advised, warned that this attack was coming and and nothing was really done to stop it. In fact, there was a military stand down on the day. So seven hours, no response. I mean, there are so many questions surrounding this and questions that really the international community has been condemned for asking. It's it's really, amazing to me the argument that commonly comes up is that Israel has a right to defend itself.
Of of course it does, but what's what's the line of self defense and was it actually self defense? Why can't we even discuss these things? I haven't seen this much censorship and condemnation around any war. Just looking at Ukraine, Russia, you know, people haven't had their entire lives canceled for just giving commentary, but it certainly has happened in the instance of this war. And so I I I'm very, very concerned, Ryan.
I I think that, you know, that there have been multiple countries that have condemned this, including, I think Jordan has even threatened to go to war with Israel, for goodness sake. I mean, this is really now escalating, and we've even had, Italy, I mean, Spain, multiple countries actually saying this is this is absolutely unacceptable. So it'll be interesting to see. Do you think that perhaps president Trump through this, sees this as the only way to achieve peace in that area? Because I've heard that argument made.
Speaker 1: I I honestly don't think so. I think that there has never been a point in time in history where anybody that was trying to censor the other party or the other half of an argument was right. Anytime that anybody's been trying to censor you or prevent you from talking about something, it is because they are in the wrong, and they can't defend themselves off of merit. The only way that they can win an argument is by silencing you. And Israel is on the wrong side of this argument.
And I think that the world's really starting to wake up to it. And if Israel did not have the support of the of The USA, The United States right now, and our military, and the threat of what Trump might do to them, I think they would be in very, very big trouble.
Speaker 0: Well, I found the golden pager to be a very interesting I mean, I don't I don't know. Was that a was that a threat to president Trump? You know, I've I've heard very little from the conservative side really discussing what this golden pager was all about. What a bizarre gift to give someone that pager was, you know, if everyone remembers that attack, these pages were essentially, you know, hacked in advance, or fitted with explosives in advance. And then, you know, even though there's claims that terrorists were taken out by this, so were innocent civilians.
And it was, again, something that was widely condemned by many in the international community, presented as something good, of course, on a lot of conservative media. Linda Yaccarino was very happy about it, actually. And, and, you know, why would you give someone a a pager? That's to me, that looks like a threat.
Speaker 1: Why would you frame a syringe from the COVID nineteen vaccine and put it on your desk? The level of just demonicness that you would have to have to to frame a pager a pager or or give somebody a golden pager that represents such a demonic part of history, something that was so evil and cynical. When innocent people are dying, that is not a good thing. And president Trump was very clear when he gave his speech. I think it was at the World Economic Forum in 2020 when he talks about terrorists.
And when when innocent people are getting killed, it's not because you're defending religion. You are a terrorist. There is God wants nothing to do with slaughtering innocent women and children. And that's exactly what Benjamin Netanyahu has done here. I I don't think how anybody can see this as anything but a genocide.
And now it's going to be illegal to talk about. I think that's how you know that we're on the right side of history.
Speaker 0: Yes. Very, very, telling. When when things become illegal to talk about, that is a clear indication that something that the people are being lied to, and, and and we see more and more people laws being enacted to to stifle any criticism of this nation and yet, more and more people are are sort of talking about it, which I think they have every right to do. Ryan, I briefly wanna speak to you about USAID where we got a couple of minutes here. We have a lot of panic from, Democrats and, I think that what's been uncovered is really fantastic, although I am sort of, raising questions about some of the characters involved in this project of Doge.
But, this is very intricately linked to your work actually because of the fact that US Aid has been used for very nefarious purposes. Talk to us about this briefly.
Speaker 1: Yeah. So USAID, I always call it USAID and I know people are like, you know, don't do it. Don't call it USAID because it gives it the wrong, like, pretext in people's mind. But USAID is literally the money laundering arm of the CIA. They are the linchpin that connects the Department of Defense, the CIA, and the State Department.
Their budget is $50,000,000,000 a year. It is two it is double that of the CIA and the State Department combined. That's how much money USAID has, and they have this black ops budget that's basically unauditable. So how this works is USAID will go into these third world countries, and they'll set up an NGO network like you would set up an offshore bank account. So you go from country to country to country to country to country.
So it's almost impossible to trace the money back to its origin. When they set up these NGO networks, they set up an NGO that funds an NGO that funds an NGO that commits the crime. Right? So trying to connect the NGO that committed the crime back to USAID is literally next to impossible. And when they go into these third world countries, what they'll do and this got a this is big picture.
This is a five, ten, twenty. Some of these times, it's even a sixty year operation like what was happening in El Salvador, and they turned El Salvador into the deadliest country in the world. What we're seeing in in our in, Guatemala and why I've been so laser focused on Guatemala is because we haven't caught debts to rights. They were caught in the act of staging this last coup, trying to remove this attorney general from power, and it has failed miserably. But in the process, they've installed politicians.
When they go into the country originally, the first thing that they'll do is they'll normally bring, the National Endowment for Democracy with them. And the National Endowment for Democracy acts almost like the recruiting arm or the staffing agency for USAID or the or the CIA. And they'll create job postings for Guatemalan National, for example, that fits all of this criteria. Well educated, articulate, comes from a family with money, popular on social media, blah blah blah blah blah. And then once they basically recruit this person, they either bribe them, blackmail them, or they just offer them power.
And a lot of people would just do it for the power. And then they take that person. They look for media outlets that are failing in their country, and they'll go to the media outlet, and they'll say, hey. We're willing to make a $10,000 a month, a $50,000 a month, a hundred thousand dollar a month donation in exchange for you allowing us to pick the person that's gonna do the 4PM show, the 5PM show, the 6PM show. And then once they basically take over these media outlets in these third world countries, they use those media outlets to amplify the politicians that will do their bidding, and they use it to demonize the politicians that won't.
And over a five, ten, or fifteen period, like in Guatemala, they've taken over the entire electoral college, they've taken over the Supreme Court, they've taken over majority of the legislative over 50% so they can pass any laws that they'd like. And now just recently in 2023, they rigged the twenty twenty three election. So now the last person staying in the way of you but you've covered this this story many times is the attorney general in Guatemala. So to put that into context, it's not just USAID that our government needs to be looking into. USAID is how the money moves and how they set up all these enforce that without any power?
They do that with the state department. So in Guatemala right now, USAID and AID in the last four years has funneled in $797,000,000 into Guatemala. That money is completely unaudible. Where did it go? What did it do?
What does Guatemala have to show for it? Oh, Guatemala is becoming the child kidnapping capital of the world. A 90,052 migrant children ages zero to 17 have been kidnapped and trafficked out of Guatemala in the last four years and processed more migratorily where our government has taken physical custody of these children, vetted a sponsor, and then authorized even these delivery of these children to a sponsor in America, and now they can't find roughly 75% of them. And Mark Rubio was just there two days ago, and we heard not one word about this, not one word of a 90,000 missing children. How is that possible, Maria?
Speaker 0: It's a very good question. I, really, really wanna encourage people to go to your ex account at Ryan Mata Media and watch the latest documentary about this. Ryan says, America, are you ready to learn the truth about USAID and the over 190,000 missing Guatemalan children? He's tagged Pam Pam Bondi in this. And, I think that more than anything, yes, of course, the dollars that have gone missing, absolutely matter.
And the the, you know, the the absolute theft of the American taxpayer absolutely matters. But what is behind this theft? Well, it's more than just 30,000,000 for Sesame Street. We're talking about child trafficking. We're talking about depopulation programs, and and so much evil and that needs to stop.
So really encourage everyone again at Ryan Mata Media. Watch that documentary. Share it. Ryan, we really appreciate your, your takes today and your time. Thank you so much.
Speaker 1: God bless you, Maria. Thank you.
Speaker 0: God bless. Now, whether you agree with the analysis of our guest or not, the fact is that this particular conflict has been presented in a very biased fashion across the world. It is only possible to achieve the best outcome if we hear from all sides and have honest discussions without the labels of terrorist sympathizer or extremist or whatever other childish name calling people want to throw at it. We're talking about tens of thousands of dead innocent women and children, and people who've survived in some cases the death of their entire families and their homeland in the process. These people are not animals as some of the media would like to paint them.
They are human beings and they have a right to self determination just like anyone else. We will continue to keep you informed as this deal progresses nonetheless. And that's all that we have time for this evening folks. Please make sure to go and follow us on free speech platform Rumble and let everyone else know to do the same. Please also make sure to like, give us your thoughts in the comments and share this broadcast widely and remember to bookmark the post on x.
It really helped your favorite accounts increase their visibility, so you can help them and us by bookmarking posts. Follow Vigilant News and Vigilant Fox on X. Visit the Vigilant News Network website for regular updates and find me on x also at z_media. That's ztriplee_media. We'll be back next Sunday at 6PM Eastern with the truth the mainstream media desperately does not want you to know, but you can be sure we will be here to tell you all about it.
Until then, stay informed, stay vigilant. Good night.
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
@RyanMattaMedia BONUS #1 - BUSTED: USAID Caught Funding Massive ‘News’ Platform to Expand Censorship Worldwide https://vigilantnews.com/post/busted-usaid-caught-funding-massive-news-platform-to-expand-censorship-worldwide/
BUSTED: USAID Caught Funding Massive ‘News’ Platform to Expand Censorship Worldwide
WikiLeaks just dropped a new bombshell.
vigilantnews.com
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
@RyanMattaMedia BONUS #2 - The Meat Upgrade You Didn’t Know You Needed https://vigilantnews.com/post/the-meat-upgrade-you-didnt-know-you-needed/
The Meat Upgrade You Didn’t Know You Needed
When it comes to meat, not all are created equal.
vigilantnews.com
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
@RyanMattaMedia BONUS #3 - Dismantling the Common Lies Used to Push Vaccines https://vigilantnews.com/post/dismantling-the-common-lies-used-to-push-vaccines/
Dismantling the Common Lies Used to Push Vaccines
This changes everything.
vigilantnews.com
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
@RyanMattaMedia BONUS #4 - How to Get Ivermectin, Z-Pak and More https://vigilantnews.com/post/how-to-get-ivermectin-z-pak-and-more/
How to Get Ivermectin, Z-Pak, and More
While millions of Americans understand the need to be prepared, far too many are failing to stockpile one of the single most important items.
vigilantnews.com
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
@RyanMattaMedia BONUS #5 - Trump Reveals the Next Eight People He is Revoking Security Clearances From After Stripping Biden’s https://vigilantnews.com/post/trump-reveals-the-next-eight-people-he-is-revoking-security-clearances-from-after-stripping-bidens/
Trump Reveals the Next Eight People He is Revoking Security Clearances From After Stripping Biden’s
He also identified the top target on his list.
vigilantnews.com
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
@RyanMattaMedia Thanks for watching! We’ll be back next Sunday at 6 PM Eastern with another hard-hitting episode. In the meantime, follow these accounts and our guests to stay informed: @NicHulscher @RyanMattaMedia @zeee_media@VigilantNews See you next Sunday. https://t.co/Tv47thCylW
reSee.it AI Summary
Multiple U.S. states are moving to ban COVID vaccines, with eight states leading the charge. Over 81,000 medical professionals and 240 elected officials are demanding the withdrawal of these vaccines, citing overwhelming evidence of harm. A peer-reviewed study indicates that vaccine-related deaths exceed recall thresholds significantly. Reports show vaccinated individuals face a higher risk of infection, and DNA contamination has been found in vaccine batches. The medical establishment is criticized for not adhering to the Hippocratic Oath, and more states may soon follow suit.
@RodDMartin - Rod D. Martin
🚨BREAKING: Multiple U.S. states now moving to BAN COVID vaccines. And the Federal government may follow suit. THIS IS HUGE... 🧵Thread (1/11)
@RodDMartin - Rod D. Martin
Eight states are leading the charge to END the "Jab" experiment: • Washington • Idaho • Montana • Iowa • Texas • Tennessee • South Carolina • Florida (Tell me in the comments if I've missed any.) (2/11)
@RodDMartin - Rod D. Martin
KNOW THIS: Over 81,000 medical professionals, 240 elected officials, and 17 professional organizations are DEMANDING these shots be pulled. The evidence of the Vax's harm? OVERWHELMING. (3/11)
@RodDMartin - Rod D. Martin
🔥NEW BOMBSHELL STUDY🔥 Peer-reviewed research CONFIRMS what we've been saying: These "vaccines" have exceeded previous recall thresholds by up to 375,340% Let THAT sink in. (4/11)
@RodDMartin - Rod D. Martin
SHOCKING TRUTH about excess mortality: 12 separate studies now link mass vaccination to increased deaths 🚨 Autopsies showing DIRECT CAUSAL connections The science they tried to silence is speaking (5/11)
@RodDMartin - Rod D. Martin
FACT: The "vaccinated" got MORE infections than the unvaccinated Some studies show up to 253% INCREASED RISK after 3+ doses Still trust Big Pharma's narrative? (6/11)
@RodDMartin - Rod D. Martin
🧬 DNA CONTAMINATION ALERT: Tests reveal vaccine batches contain DNA fragments FAR ABOVE safety limits set by: • FDA • EMA Where's the Enemedia's coverage? There isn't any. They're still telling you to go get "the Jab". Or your 43rd booster. (7/11)
@RodDMartin - Rod D. Martin
PERSPECTIVE: Previous vaccines were pulled after just 10 deaths Current VAERS data shows 37,544 deaths globally The math isn't hard, folks. They rushed a vaccine to market without proper testing and then tried to force you to take it. (8/11)
@RodDMartin - Rod D. Martin
BIG PHARMA'S DIRTY SECRET: No large-scale, double-blind trials show these shots: • Stop you from getting COVID • Stop you from spreading it • Reduce infection • Prevent hospitalization • Save lives ZERO. NONE. NADA. But it turns out that it can kill you. (9/11)
@RodDMartin - Rod D. Martin
Every doctor pushing these shots is violating their Hippocratic Oath. "First, do no harm" = MEANINGLESS to them now? The medical establishment has lost its way. (10/11)
@RodDMartin - Rod D. Martin
🚨 The dam is breaking. More states will follow. Federal government will be FORCED to act. Stay informed. Stay vigilant. Share this thread. 👇 Oh, and also, sign up for your FREE subscription to my newsletter at http://RodMartin.org. (11/11)
The Rod Martin Report | Rod D. Martin | Substack
Tech Entrepreneur. Futurist. Christian. "Philosopher Capitalist". Click to read The Rod Martin Report, by Rod D. Martin, a Substack publication with thousands of subscribers.
rodmartin.org
@TheChiefNerd - Chief Nerd
Excellent summary 👇
@MdBreathe - Mary Talley Bowden MD
Montana tried to pass a bill banning mRNA but 24 republicans and 42 democrats voted against it. I assume this means they are all following CDC recommendations and getting an annual booster and making sure their kids are up-to-date. Here is the roll call: https://t.co/1jUk52nCeN
reSee.it AI Summary
I've been following the intense discussions surrounding RFK Jr.'s recent posts about the MMR vaccine and its alleged links to autism. There's a lot happening behind the scenes, including the resignation of the FDA's top vaccine regulator. Kennedy's campaign is focused on exposing hidden data about vaccine injuries and revamping CDC policies. Meanwhile, significant legislative changes are occurring, like Idaho's Medical Freedom Act, which bans medical mandates, and Iowa's push to end vaccine manufacturers' immunity from lawsuits. The movement is gaining traction, but challenges remain.
@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta
𝕏 is losing it over RFK Jr.’s measles post. Meanwhile, FDA’s top vaccine regulator just resigned. Turns out Kennedy plans to EXPOSE hidden data on MMR injuries. There is a lot more going on behind the scenes than meets the eye … 🧵THREAD
@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta
RFK’s own 2024 campaign was touched by tragedy over the MMR shot. Nicole Shanahan revealed that her daughter was diagnosed with autism after the shot. “I swear to God, I gave birth to a healthy baby girl.” “And then she got a shot at 7 months of age, and by 10 months she was a different kid.” @NicoleShanahan @TuckerCarlson
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker, an early AI developer and techno optimist from Silicon Valley, discusses how her daughter's autism diagnosis led her to a different understanding. Her daughter was healthy until she received a shot at seven months old, after which she changed. The speaker experienced grief and confusion, compounded by the inability to discuss the possibility of a vaccine reaction due to societal constraints. She mentions Andy Wakefield, who was canceled for suggesting the MMR vaccine causes gut inflammation in some children, leading to autism-like symptoms. The speaker felt isolated, especially during COVID, and this isolation, combined with the challenges of raising her daughter, brought her to a point of utter destruction. She states that this experience either leads to isolation or transforms one into a "warrior mom."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: How did that suffering bring you to an understanding of God? You know, I think that we are all put on this planet to learn things and see things in a very unique perspective. I was living a very comfortable life in Silicon Valley. I was an early AI developer. I was a techno optimist.
And my daughter was diagnosed with autism when she was 18 of age. And I swear to God, I gave birth to a healthy baby girl. It was all I ever wanted was this healthy baby girl and she was healthy. I mean, she smiled, she did all these things. She was healthy.
And then she got a shot at seven months of age and by 10, she was a different kid. And I had an enormous amount of grief, but then sudden the confusion because I was not allowed to consider the fact that the shot caused anything. Andy Wakefield is here guys. He's right there. Andy Wakefield, if you don't know him, was canceled twenty five years ago for pointing out that the MMR causes gut inflammation in certain children, which leads to symptoms like autism.
He's a big deal. So my grief was also a very lonely period because no one around me could be someone I could trust with even this notion that perhaps the shot caused an adverse reaction. This is a no go for progressives. You cannot talk about these things amongst these communities. And the loneliness plus COVID, because this happened around COVID too, led me to a place of utter destruction.
And I was alone in that, process. And, we don't have to talk about my ex husband. It's very therapeutic to be here. It's kind of like therapy right now. You know, coming out of that completely alone with a child that you feel helpless to help is a position that either leads you to total hermitage or makes you a warrior mom.
@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta
The process of licensing the MMR and the data behind it was deeply disturbing. RFK Jr. spent years sounding the alarm about this. He did not forget all of it overnight. There’s more going on here than you think.🧵
@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta
In the 1950s, top CDC scientists had reached a consensus that measles was a “self-limiting infection of short duration, moderate severity, and low fatality.” Severe measles cases were only caused by malnutrition, lack of Vitamin A, or a weakened immune system. https://t.co/N0rDygseLr
@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta
This consensus was upended for two key reasons. 1. Pharma realized the enormous profit potential in mass-vaccinating Americans for measles. 2. American scientists wanted to beat Soviet scientists, who were also working to develop a vaccine. Fear-mongering about measles by the media and politicians only began in earnest after the vaccine was licensed and Pharma stood to lose an enormous profit center.
@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta
The MMR shot was licensed without a clean placebo-controlled study. The trials that did happen only tracked adverse events for 42 days after vaccination and discounted a host of chronic diseases and adverse events. https://t.co/SaRurYchFW
@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta
Despite RFK Jr.’s 𝕏 post endorsing MMR vaccination … There is more going on behind the scenes than meets the eye.🧵
@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta
FDA’s top vaccine regulator Dr. Peter Marks just resigned over RFK’s attempts to revive MMR vaccine safety studies. “Kennedy’s team requested data on cases of brain swelling and deaths caused by the” MMR vaccines. https://t.co/ovIWZplMGn
@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta
RFK Jr. just pledged “EVERYTHING is gonna change” with CDC vaccine policy. He pledged to fix VAERS, restore “gold standard science” and expose the truth about vaccine injuries. “None of the vaccines that are given during the first 6 months of life have ever been tested for autism—the only one was the DTP vaccine.” “They threw out that study because it was based upon CDC’s surveillance system, VAERS, and they said that system is no good.” “That begs the question, why doesn’t CDC have a functional surveillance system?” “In fact, CDC’s own study of its own system said it captures fewer than 1% of vaccine injuries.” “We’re gonna publish all of our datasets, which CDC has never done.” “We’re gonna do replication of all our studies, which CDC has never done.” “We’re gonna publish our peer review, which CDC has never done.” @SecKennedy @michaeljknowles
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker states that vaccine policy will change due to better information. They claim that none of the vaccines given in the first six months of life have been tested, except for the DTP vaccine, which a study linked to issues, but was dismissed due to problems with the CDC's surveillance system.
The speaker asserts the CDC lacks a functional surveillance system to capture vaccine injuries, with their own study showing it captures less than 1% of injuries. They plan to fix this by implementing a functional surveillance system, using data management, and providing answers to the public.
The speaker promises to follow the science, use gold standard science, publish all datasets, replicate studies, and publish peer reviews, which they claim the CDC has never done, to provide real answers.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I know the, the question that you've been asked throughout your confirmation hearings, of course, was about the public's, I think, justifiable concern with the growth of vaccines. And the senators, asked you enough questions about that, but I don't think you need to rehash a lot of it. But for the people who are asking questions about whether or not they'll vaccinate their kids or whether they should vaccinate their kids, will anything change about vaccine policy?
Speaker 1: Everything's gonna change because because we're gonna have good information. And, you know, none of the vaccines that are given you know, people said to me during the hearing, oh, well, that this link between autism and vaccines has been disproven. None of the vaccines that are that are given during the first six months of life have ever been tested for the only one was the DTP vaccine. And that one study that was done, according to the Institute of Medicine, the National Academy of Science, found that there was a link. They threw out that study because it was based upon CDC's surveillance system, theirs, and they said that system is no good.
I think it begs the question is why doesn't CDC have a functional surveillance system? We're gonna make sure they do have a functional surveillance system. Right now, surveillance system is the system that because they don't do pre licensing safety testing for vaccines. They're the only product that's exempt. So what they say is if there are injuries, we'll capture them afterward.
They have a system that doesn't capture them. In fact, CDC's own study of its own system said it captures fewer than one percent of vaccine injuries. It's worthless, and everybody agrees it's worthless. But but why have we gone for thirty nine years and nobody's fixed it?
Speaker 0: Without a functional system. Right.
Speaker 1: We're gonna fix it, and we have, you know, we have Doge, you know, knows how to manage data. And so we're gonna be able to get into these databases and give answers to the American public. And and we're gonna fix the problems. If there are problems, we're gonna fix them very quickly, but we're gonna follow the science. That's what we're gonna do.
We're gonna have gold standard science, and we're gonna follow the science. We're gonna publish all of our datasets, which CDC has never done. We're gonna do replicate replication of all of our studies, which CDC has never done. We're gonna publish our peer review, which CDC has never done. So people are gonna have real answers for the first time.
@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta
Behind the scenes, RFK Jr. is taking steps to expose the truth of MMR and other vaccine injuries. But Big Pharma is the most powerful force in American politics. This is not a fight that can be won overnight.🧵
@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta
One key Senator is working to block MAHA on behalf of Big Pharma. Senator Bill Cassidy revealed that he voted to confirm RFK Jr. only after extracting concessions on vaccine policy. If MAHA wants to direct our anger at anyone in DC for standing in our way, it’s Senator Cassidy. You won’t believe what he said about the vaccine-injured in Dr. Jay Bhattacharya’s confirmation hearing. @SenBillCassidy
@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta
In response to Dr. Jay Bhattacharya’s pledge to find the truth about skyrocketing autism rates … Senator Bill Cassidy mockingly compared the belief in a link between vaccines and autism to the belief that the world is flat and Elvis is still alive. “There's people who disagree that the world is round—and I say that not to minimize these people’s concerns—but people still think Elvis is alive.” How could this be interpreted in any way other than insulting and minimizing these MAHA moms’ concerns? @DrJBhattacharya @SenBillCassidy
Video Transcript AI Summary
Some people disagree with me, but people disagree that the world is round and some think Elvis is still alive. If we allocate limited taxpayer dollars to address every disagreement, instead of issues like obesity, heart disease, and cancer, we lose due to opportunity cost. The question is whether we should devote resources to something just because someone is upset about it, especially when the issue has already been well-examined.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There are people who who might disagree with me. I wanna make sure that this Yeah. I mean, there's people who disagree that the world is round. That's true. And I say that not to minimize these concerns, but but people's people still think Elvis is alive.
And so if you just say someone disagrees with me, so therefore, I'm going to put precious limited taxpayer dollars to this and not to addressing issues of obesity, heart disease, cancer. We've lost. There's an opportunity cost there. You're the economist. What am I doing talking about opportunity cost?
So, I'm pressing you on this because I think that that kind of is a framework if just because somebody is upset about something, do we do we have the opportunity cost of devoting resources? It's something which has already been pretty well examined. I mean,
@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta
MAHA is bigger than RFK Jr. While 𝕏 lost their minds over Kennedy’s MMR comment, we just got our biggest win yet in Idaho.🧵
@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta
Idaho’s Medical Freedom Act 2.0 was just signed into law. 🔥 It BANS businesses and schools from requiring ANY “medical mandates” for employment or attendance. Businesses and schools were already banned from requiring the Covid-19 vaccine for attendance or employment based on a 2023 law, but this bill expanded that provision to ALL medical interventions. @LeslieManookian
@Holden_Culotta - Holden Culotta
Iowa Republicans want to END vaccine manufacturers’ immunity from lawsuits for vaccine injuries. “A vaccine shall not be distributed, sold, or administered in this state unless the manufacturer … waives any immunity from suit for an injury arising from a design defect of the vaccine.” Bills like this would be MAHA’s biggest wins yet, and they would pave the way for RFK Jr. and federal leaders to follow suit.
@newstart_2024 - Camus
RFK Jr. talks about religious objections to fetus DNA fragments in the MMR vaccine. Do you need to be religious to refuse that or is it common sense? https://t.co/PTDAt0Ozeb
Video Transcript AI Summary
The current MMR vaccine contains millions of DNA fragments created from aborted fetal tissue, which some people object to on religious grounds. These individuals should be treated with compassion, especially in healthcare settings. One failure of the CDC is not informing doctors that no child should die of measles. Prior to the vaccine's introduction in 1963, there were 400 measles deaths annually out of up to two million cases.
While the MMR vaccine doesn't contain fetal cells, it does contain DNA fragments from a fetal cell line originating from a 1960s abortion. Some people have religious objections to this. During a measles outbreak, some individuals felt like they were treated as pariahs in hospitals due to their religious beliefs. Everyone should have a choice and still be treated with respect, regardless of religious objections.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We also understand that some people don't do that. The MMR vaccine that we current yield currently use has over has millions of particles from or created from aborted fetal tissue, millions of DNA fragments, and there are people who have religious objections toward those, and those people should be treated with compassion. If they come to a hospital and they're sick, we need to know how to treat them. And one of the failures of the CDC in the past is they weren't telling doctors no kid should die of measles in this country. Even in 1963, before the introduction of the vaccine, there were four hundred deaths a year, and there were up to two million measles cases.
So it's, only very, very sick kids should die from measles. You know? Nobody should.
Speaker 1: There's some that were saying that the rubella portion of the vaccine, and you're talking about the produce from the fetal cell line originated from an abortion that took place in the sixties, but the MMR vaccine doesn't contain the cells in its final form.
Speaker 0: It doesn't contain cells, but they it contains DNA fragments.
Speaker 1: Got it. Got it. And so that's your point.
Speaker 0: Yeah. So and people have religious objections to that. And although I might not share those objections, I I respect them, and I think those people, you know, a lot of the men and I said, told me, and I went down there and spent time with the community during the outbreak. And they said they didn't wanna go to the hospital because they were treated as pariah. They said we were treated like lepers there.
And that should not be part of American health care. If somebody comes in, if they have religious objection, we should still be treating them.
Speaker 1: And your big point is a choice.
@NicHulscher - Nicolas Hulscher, MPH
Just presented irrefutable evidence for immediate market withdrawal of mRNA shots to a certain state governor’s office, alongside many brave scientists and physicians. It appears to have been successful. A multi-state push for a moratorium on mRNA is now underway.