reSee.it - Related Post Feed

Saved - March 16, 2023 at 2:27 AM

@AntonioSabatoJr - Antonio Sabato Jr

Jill Biden’s CCP’s $3M Cut https://t.co/LhI2WlzDmC

Video Transcript AI Summary
A $3 million wire was discovered going to the Biden family shortly after Joe Biden left office. The money was then distributed to three different Biden family members, including a new member not previously investigated. The purpose of the wire and the nature of the business involved remains unclear. It is speculated that this could be influence peddling, which would be a violation of foreign agent rules. More wires have been traced from China to the Biden family, and a new name has emerged, indicating a broader involvement of the Biden family. This raises concerns about what the family was doing to receive these transactions from China and is an issue of national importance.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, we discovered that they got a $3,000,000 wire, 2 months after Joe Biden left office. And then the very next day, the from that account, that Walker account that appears to be a pass through account, then they started wiring money to Biden family members, plural. And there were 3 different Biden family members that received a cut from that $3,000,000,000, including a new Biden family member that's never before been included in any of these investigations. So our question is, you know, what exactly did they do to receive that money? What was the purpose of that $3,000,000 wire? Now that's just the 1st wire that we've actually been able to obtain bank records on. There are many, many more. This was for for business. We can't identify any business. It it appears it went into their personal account. So if China's investing With the Bidens in the business, we can't find any business. They don't manufacture anything. They don't sell anything. They don't own any real estate. We don't know what the business is. You know, my theory is it's influence peddling. And if so, then that that's wrong. That's what we call a foreign agent. There are rules with who could be foreign agents, and you have to be registered to be foreign agent. So, you know, the question is, what were the Bidens doing to receive the these massive amounts of money from China. Now we have the 1st wire, and we've traced it from China to the Biden family members. We have many more, to obtain. Speaker 1: Okay. Two more points here in the time we have left. You said another name popped up. Whose name is that? Are they a relative directly tied to the family? Speaker 0: Well, they're a Biden. I'm not gonna disclose that new name because that, really changes things. Because, what we assumed was this was just about the president's son and 2 brothers, but now there's a new name that's emerged. So and and they are a Biden. So we've got a problem here, with respect to trying to determine what exactly this family was doing, to to receive these transactions from China. Speaker 1: This is important. Speaker 0: And I think every American should be concerned about that. This is an issue of Social Security.
Saved - November 25, 2023 at 1:48 PM

@NLCRYPTOCARTEL - alienwhisperer 👽👽

@iluminatibot Everyone knows that curing cancer isn't as profitable as treating it and billing you every step of the way. However, one thing to consider is that the elite have never died of an cancer, they always die of an old age. What does that tell you? Think about it.🤯 https://t.co/munAaim9E7

Saved - October 16, 2024 at 1:57 PM

@liz_churchill10 - Liz Churchill

It’s a crime to hide this from the Public. This should be available to everyone with cancer. https://t.co/T3ri39NPx4

Saved - December 20, 2024 at 8:31 PM

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

The Democrats are lying again 🤨

@libsoftiktok - Libs of TikTok

Turns out the cancer research funding that Democrats are all blaming on @elonmusk, was a stand alone bill that passed in the Republican controlled House but got held up in the Democrat controlled Senate. Democrats k*lled a funding bill for child cancer research. https://t.co/fGwVHoRErH

Saved - December 20, 2024 at 9:09 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Elizabeth Warren claims that I, along with Republicans, blocked funding for child cancer research. In reality, a standalone bill for this funding passed the Republican-controlled House in March but was held up in the Democrat-controlled Senate. Democrats are the ones who blocked it.

@libsoftiktok - Libs of TikTok

Elizabeth Warren repeats the lie that @elonmusk and Republicans blocked funding for child cancer research. A stand alone bill for child cancer research funding passed the Republican controlled House in March and got held up in the Democrat controlled Senate. Democrats blocked funding for child cancer research.

Video Transcript AI Summary
We're witnessing the implications of having Dogecoin integrated into our system, heavily influenced by Elon Musk. The current bill proposes cutting funding for crucial research areas, including pediatric cancer, early detection of cervical and breast cancer, and conditions like Down syndrome and sickle cell anemia. These cuts are aimed at providing tax breaks for billionaires, reflecting Musk's idea of efficiency.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But we actually are now getting our first taste. This is it live and in living color about what it means to have this, Doge right out here and what that's gonna mean, and that's where Elon Musk's fingerprints are all over this. Because, for example, what this bill says is, oh, let's get rid of funding for research on pediatric cancer. Let's get rid of funding for research on early detection of cervical cancer and breast cancer. Let's get rid of funding for research on children with Down syndrome and on sickle cell anemia. Let's get rid of those things so that we can make way for tax cuts for billionaires. That is Elon Musk's notion of efficiency. It is.
Saved - December 20, 2024 at 11:13 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I'm trying to understand the situation with the "Cancer Research for Kids" bill. Has the Senate really been sitting on it since May or June? It feels like they might be delaying it to bundle it with the spending bill, possibly to shift blame to Republicans. This raises serious concerns about their intentions.

@thevivafrei - Viva Frei

Can someone explain this to me? Has the Senate been sitting on the "Cancer Research for Kids" bill since May / June and done nothing with it? Did they deliberately delay passing that bill so they could stick it in the current spending bill, along with all the other shite, so they could blame the rejection on Republicans? I mean there is evil. But there are also levels of evil. Did Democrats go to Satan-levels of evil here?

@PolitiBunny - The🐰FOO

This is a blatant lie. Schumer has been sitting on a bill to find cancer research for children since March of this year. Democrats are shameless. https://t.co/2i2ETrkPmE

Video Transcript AI Summary
Republicans are pushing for a government shutdown that could harm the economy and negatively impact working-class Americans. Their focus seems to be on providing significant tax cuts for wealthy donors instead of funding essential programs like cancer research for children.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Republicans are marching America to a painful government shutdown that will crash the economy and hurt working class Americans because they would rather enact massive tax cuts for their billionaire donors than fund cancer research for donors, then fund cancer research for children.
Saved - December 21, 2024 at 5:45 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Today, Senate Democrats finally passed the childhood cancer research bill they had blocked for nine months, despite House Republicans approving it back in March. Democrats leveraged this critical funding to push through unrelated provisions in a larger bill, threatening to frame Republicans as against childhood cancer funding. After significant media manipulation, the truth emerged, thanks to voices on X calling out the deception. Ultimately, the bill passed, highlighting the importance of transparency and the power of social media in countering political tactics.

@robbystarbuck - Robby Starbuck

Today Senate Democrats FINALLY passed the clean bill for childhood cancer research that they’ve blocked for NINE MONTHS. Yes, House Republicans passed it 9 months ago. Now let me explain the evil tactic that Dems used to leverage kids with cancer to get other things they wanted. - MARCH 2024 - House Republicans passed a clean bill approving critical funding for pediatric cancer research. They expected the Democrat controlled Senate to pass it shortly after but… They never did. Why? House R’s would find out in 9 months. Fast forward to December 2024. Funding for the childhood cancer research was forced into the CR/omnibus bill. This bill included elements that funded censorship against right wing media, promotion of DEI, funding for the government, a raised debt ceiling and more of what we call "pork" that politicians wanted totally unrelated to childhood cancer. The message from Democrats to Republicans was clear now: Vote to pass the bloated establishment uniparty bill with all of our wasteful pork or we’re going to have the media spread the lie that Republicans are voting against funding for childhood cancer. Yes, Democrats were using childhood cancer as leverage to get all the waste they wanted and here’s the thing: They’ve gotten away with evil tricks like this for YEARS because the media acted as their PR arm and Republicans couldn’t compete with their media dominance… Until now. Like clockwork MSNBC, Washington Post, Rolling Stone and all the usual suspects spread the narrative that Elon Musk, Donald Trump and the Republicans had KILLED the funding for childhood cancer research. But then something incredible happened. @greg_price11 was the first one I saw on X prominently calling out the media and Dems over the fact that Republicans had in fact already passed this funding in a clean bill back in March but that it was actually DEMOCRATS who have refused to pass it. I searched the news stories and found no mention of this very important context. So after confirming all the details and the full backstory I fired off the post that’s quote tweeted below. @elonmusk shared it and nearly instantly millions of people saw it. As hours went by, this evil tactic by democrats was exposed and people were waking up to the truth. So what happened next? After 9 months the Democrat Senate rushed to pass the bill after realizing that their evil tactic had backfired. At the end of the day this is good news on 2 fronts: 1. Childhood cancer research gets funded and 2. X is able to quickly work together to dismantle the lies and propaganda that used to power this kind of evil, bureaucratic, establishment thuggery. Without X, history tells us that House R’s may have caved to the tactic that seems used. X is making government more transparent and that’s a Christmas miracle we should all be happy about. Still, it’s just vile that the Democrats would use sick kids like this. Hopefully it woke more people up to how they operate.

@robbystarbuck - Robby Starbuck

Legacy media were frothing at the mouth so hard to attack Republicans that they failed to fact check when they tried the "Trump and Elon are ending childhood cancer research" narrative. House R’s already passed it and Dems have refused to pass it in the Senate. Attack is now backfiring. Why are Senate Dems refusing to fund pediatric cancer research? Is there anything they don’t lie about?

Saved - January 30, 2025 at 12:55 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I'm questioning why American taxpayers are funding Catholic Charities, which I believe is misusing these funds. Recent grants from the Department of Health and Human Services, awarded after the election and before Trump's inauguration, raise concerns about the integrity of HHS and Catholic Charities. Notably, many of these organizations are in districts represented by those opposing Trump. I urge Congress to confirm Robert Kennedy Jr. to address these issues and investigate potential misuse of taxpayer dollars, which amount to billions.

@GenFlynn - General Mike Flynn

I’m a Catholic and I want to know why are American taxpayers funding Catholic Charities? This organization is ripping off American taxpayers. The data below outlines recent grants awarded by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). HHS established most of these grants AFTER the election and BEFORE @realDonaldTrump ‘s inauguration. Something is VERY ROTTEN in HHS and most definitely at Catholic Charities. And, please take notice that most of these "Catholic Charities" are located in areas that are represented by members of Congress who oppose President Trump and his agenda. Congress MUST CONFIRM @RobertKennedyJr immediately AND then he should crush these organizations ripping off American taxpayers and likely supporting child sex and slave trafficking. United States Conference of Catholic Bishops: $200,205,406.69 Catholic Charities Diocese of Fort Worth Endowment: $277,112,002.00 Catholic Charities Community Services: $56,438,404.70 To name a few. There are many others and they’re not just in “democrat” districts. Again, these are American Taxpayer dollars…it’s in the billions! 😡 @CforCatholics @Amerifuture @CarloMVigano https://www.usaspending.gov/

Saved - February 11, 2025 at 11:00 AM

@kyledcheney - Kyle Cheney

JUST IN: A federal judge in Massachusetts has blocked the Trump administration's rate change to NIH grants. https://t.co/6KIVlfkz63

Saved - February 12, 2025 at 2:44 PM

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

Which law firms are pushing these anti-democratic cases to impede the will of the people?

@amuse - @amuse

LAWFARE: Democrat judges across the country are working with Democrat AGs and NGOs to either block/delay president Trump's EOs aimed at reducing fraud, abuse, and waste. This time it is Biden-appointed Judge Angel Kelley from MA ordering Trump to restore DEI funding to the NIH.

Saved - February 24, 2025 at 7:07 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I recently faced backlash after being let go from my position at NIH, where I was an Education Outreach Specialist. Despite my dedication, some questioned my financial decisions and my stance on COVID-19 measures. I had been supportive of lockdowns and mask mandates, but I understand the frustration from those affected by these policies. I also faced criticism for the resources allocated to my brief tenure and my previous employment history. After reflecting on my experience, I chose to remove my emotional posts about my departure.

@NoVA_Campaigns - NOVA Campaigns

@KatieMSandlin, a probationary @NIH employee, posts crying story after being fired under Trump’s EO Katie spent years trashing Trump; a Fauci fangirl with finger puppet Education Outreach Specialist in NIH’s Education & Community Involvement Branch (ECIB) Had her own office https://x.com/katiemsandlin//katiemsandlin/status/1890929200627925166

Video Transcript AI Summary
I received an email from the Department of Health and Human Services stating that I was being terminated during my probationary period. They said my skills didn't fit the agency's needs and that my performance wasn't adequate. This really hurt because I worked hard to get this job, especially after moving from out of state. It's upsetting to think some people are celebrating this, assuming we're lazy and living off the government. My coworkers and I cared about our jobs and wanted to help people. It's painful to have something you care about taken away unfairly. I'm worried about what I'm going to do now. For those also dealing with this, know that you're not trash. What you did mattered, and you won't be forgotten by those you worked with.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I just got my, I just got an email from the Department of Health and Human Services, And the subject was of the letter was notification of termination during probationary period. And the fourth paragraph says, unfortunately, the agency finds that you are not fit for continued employment because your ability, knowledge, and skills do not fit the agency's current needs and your performance has not been adequate to justify further employment at the agency. Like, I was already really upset that I was getting fired, but that just really hurt my heart so bad because I worked so hard my entire career to get this job. And then they had the nerve to say that. It's just I don't know what I'm gonna do. I just moved here from out of state, and I'm so broke. And I'm just I don't know what I'm gonna do. And not only did the federal government basically throw me out like I'm garbage, then they, like, they say that it's because my performance was not adequate to justify further employment. I know it just really hurts my heart that there are so many people out there that are celebrating this. Like, we're some lazy people that are just living off the government and not working when my coworkers and I, like, we busted our butts and we really cared about our jobs and we really wanted to help people. And I think that's why it hurts so much because when you really care about something and it's just taken away from you so unfairly, it just I don't know. It just it just does something to you. I have no idea what I'm gonna do. I'm so screwed. And then they just I can't believe they said that. Like, I know it's a lie, but it's just like putting salt in a wound or whatever that saying is. I don't even know why I'm recording this, but I just I just really want people to know that Fang is so funny and that, like, you know, these liberals are crying tears or whatever and they get joy from that. We are real people and we have we have bills, and we have health issues and disabilities that we all need insurance to pay for. Like, why would you celebrate that? It's just so cruel. I didn't make a whole lot of money, and I was fine with that. I was was serving other people. I just wanted to be able to pay my bills and take my dog to the vet and, you know, just get by. Like, that's I'm not trying to get rich. Why do so many people hate us when we work so hard and we just wanna help them. I don't know. Anybody else that's out there that's dealing with this too, I just my heart breaks for you because we don't deserve this. We didn't do anything to deserve this. We're just you're not trash. You're important, and you you were at your agency wherever you worked, and you you did good work. And I know that doesn't mean much, but what we did mattered. And we existed even though we're being erased now. We were there, and and just know that you won't be forgotten by the ones that worked with you.

@NoVA_Campaigns - NOVA Campaigns

Perhaps hiring employees who are making terrible financial decisions are not who we need working in human genuine projects to begin with… Maxing out credit cards, taking out loans & draining your savings… to work at @NIH Wasn’t smart https://t.co/3NmxpraZ5P

@NoVA_Campaigns - NOVA Campaigns

@NIH @KatieMSandlin was cool with lockdowns, mask mandates and businesses closed during C19… as she panicked at home, shuttered away Not a lot of sympathy for people who lost their businesses due to hysteria from her cohort https://t.co/3pmvkxddX0

@NoVA_Campaigns - NOVA Campaigns

@NIH @KatieMSandlin Also consider… the resources that @NIH devotes (spends money on) to creating an individual website bio for a brand new, probationary employee, who’s been on site for only 1 month… Not an executive, but an education outreach staff member You’d think she was an SES https://t.co/PPzy22vvfC

@NoVA_Campaigns - NOVA Campaigns

@NIH @KatieMSandlin @KatieMSandlin doesn’t tell you she’s brand new at NIH because she used to be employed at @GEP_CURE under an @NIGMS grant & that funding ran out ♻️ Katie doesn’t mention: “…is it ok to point out what you failed at doing in the 1st grant?” Maybe your performance IS THE ISSUE https://t.co/UzxGT77HxQ

@NoVA_Campaigns - NOVA Campaigns

@NIH @KatieMSandlin @GEP_CURE @NIGMS Katie has removed her sob 😭 video… but continues to inform us what she did for a month at NIH… Which is entirely redundant with curriculum builders at @usedgov, the state level, school system level, and textbook publishers There’s no need for school curriculum authors at NIH https://t.co/vaSrsGGiHJ

@NoVA_Campaigns - NOVA Campaigns

@NIH @KatieMSandlin @GEP_CURE @NIGMS @usedgov Katie has in fact deleted all her @X posts lamenting the end to her probationary status We can presume she did not take the fork in the road email seriously while working for a month at @NIH https://t.co/i1rWxOu0lt

@NoVA_Campaigns - NOVA Campaigns

@NIH @KatieMSandlin @GEP_CURE @NIGMS @usedgov @X Katie also wanted to ration health care to C19 unvaccinated Americans That’s right… she worked at NIH with the opinion that those skeptical of Fauci’s ouchie C19 mRNA shot should be last in line for health care Probably not who 🇺🇸wants at @NIH

@el_kalifornio - El Kalifornio

@NoVA_Campaigns @KatieMSandlin @NIH Katie also wanted to limit medical healthcare for the unvaccinated… https://t.co/j9XycSkAZv

Saved - February 17, 2025 at 9:17 AM

@SidneyPowell1 - Sidney Powell 🇺🇸 Attorney, Author, Gladiator

This MUST be clawed back @SecKennedy @DOGE @realDonaldTrump #Gates can put his own $590M in Moderna. They killed countless people with their covid vaccine. GET OUR money back now‼️ X friends, Do you agree?

@merissahansen17 - Merissa Hansen

Moderna received $590 Million for mRNA Vaccine development from HHS, the day after Trump’s Inauguration. Why was this allowed? https://t.co/lUuZjx0iVU

Saved - February 21, 2025 at 9:19 PM

@AlexGnarcia - A/G

Considering mrna is on the childhood schedule and mandated for higger ed in many instances, and that it is the inflection variable for unequivocal rise in cancer expenditures for young people...WHAT DO YOU EXPECT, CALLEY?

@calleymeans - Calley Means

How deranged are these people. I is NOT “good news” that childhood cancer rates are so high they need to build a new multi-billion dollar center. The loan underwriting this building assumes childhood cancer growing - not ending. https://t.co/lnLtlE81XY

Saved - February 21, 2025 at 8:14 PM

@HolaBackupFiJC - HolaBackup

Fuck Hotez. Fuck Israel. And fuck their fake ass Holocaust they created to steal from us and get away with their heinous, racist, Loxist, bioterrorist, genocidal bullshit. Lying fucking charlatans.🖕 https://t.co/D8v8snkx3X

@calleymeans - Calley Means

How deranged are these people. I is NOT “good news” that childhood cancer rates are so high they need to build a new multi-billion dollar center. The loan underwriting this building assumes childhood cancer growing - not ending. https://t.co/lnLtlE81XY

Saved - March 27, 2025 at 10:13 PM

@epaleezeldin - Lee Zeldin

I have terminated the $2 BILLION Biden EPA grant to this Stacey Abrams-linked NGO. The DOJ/FBI are investigating and the money has been frozen. It is insane that the Biden Admin would give $2B to an organization that previously only received $100!

@RapidResponse47 - Rapid Response 47

👀 https://t.co/yEOUXpxLOT

Saved - April 3, 2025 at 8:13 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I came across a shocking hidden camera video featuring James Welch, a genetic counselor at NIH, where he advises researchers to change terms like "race" to "ancestry" in grant applications to avoid scrutiny from the Department of Government Efficiency. He reveals the manipulation of language to bypass federal restrictions and expresses troubling thoughts about firearms and retaliation against NIH individuals. The NIH has since responded, stating they will terminate funding that doesn't align with their priorities and reaffirming their commitment to evidence-based science.

@OKeefeMedia - O’Keefe Media Group

CAUGHT ON HIDDEN CAMERA: @NIH Genetic Counselor Tells Researchers to “Change ‘Race’ to ‘Ancestry’” in Clinical Trials to Evade @DOGE and Secure Funding; Admits to Wanting to Shoot People at NIH “My mom told me today not to shoot anybody… but they won't let me close enough to these f*cking people.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
James O'Keefe reports on James Welch, an NIH genetic counselor, who appears to be manipulating language in research applications to circumvent government oversight, specifically from "Doge." Welch is allegedly coaching researchers to avoid using "banned words" like "women," "men," and "race" in grant applications, suggesting alternatives like "ancestry." Welch claims NIH intramural research can "basically do anything" if they have the money. According to O'Keefe, a senior administration official stated there's no specific policy regarding racial preferences in health, suggesting Welch is creating this algorithm in his own mind. O'Keefe alleges this circumvents the will of President Trump and Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Welch also expresses disdain for Robert F. Kennedy Jr., his boss, and suggests replacing Trump's portrait with Putin's. He mentions potential NIH job cuts and jokes about buying guns, stating "they won't let me close enough to these people." O'Keefe calls for transparency and accountability within government institutions.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Approving a protocol, a really interesting protocol of using this microdialysis and to test cortisol levels. One of our investigators wants to test it in women, black women, and white women. I I had to go and look at, like, what was leaked as far as the banned words that he was just, like, control f searching for. So I was trying to help her, like, suggest wording. I had suggested, like, I can see your ancestry instead of race. Speaker 1: James Welch is caught on our hidden camera talking about manipulating language to circumvent government oversight, specifically Doge oversight. Speaker 0: Our grants aren't getting canceled. Mhmm. Speaker 2: We're intramural, so we get to do Speaker 0: basically whatever we approve Yeah. And we get to do Speaker 1: certain experiment's happening within the walls of NIH's own buildings. They can do basically anything as long as they have the money. My mom told Speaker 0: me to lay that shit. Like, Speaker 3: you guys have Speaker 0: been buying guns. They won't let me Speaker 4: be close enough to these people. Speaker 1: The NIH genetic counselor within the NIH tells us on hidden camera that his mother told him not to shoot anybody. Speaker 0: Well, why not be prepared? Speaker 5: I just wanna go down like a What are Speaker 0: your views on it? You're asking me a lot of questions. I have not got a chance to ask your your questions. I was just thinking it'd be funny if you were, like, a government spy just like, what are we planning, James? Speaker 1: I'm James O'Keefe. You work with the NIH. This is you on camera. I heard you had a really bad day. You're about to have a worse day. I'm James O'Keefe here outside Washington DC standing outside the headquarters of the National Institute of Health, NIH. It's within this building that a man named James Welch works. He's the genetic counselor and research coordinator for NDDK. That's National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases. It appears in this undercover video that Welch and the PI, that's principal investigator he's working with, is counseling are seeking allowance on a clinical trial regarding using microdialysis to test cortisol levels in black and white women for research. Speaker 0: I work both with the patients and then also with, like, the the PIs, the the principal investigators writing their studies, running their studies. For our institute, I'm one of the people who approach both. You know? Yeah. Like, oh, this is a good study. Like, yesterday, I was approving a protocol, a really interesting protocol using this microdialysis to test cortisol levels. One of our investigators wants to test it in women, black women, and white women. People are stratified by whether you have metabolic dysfunction and whether you're African American or Yeah. A a white woman. Speaker 1: Where things get interesting is the political bias that James Welch, genetics counselor, appears to be injecting into the process to circumvent government oversight, specifically Doge oversight. He specifically calls out Doge, says that DOGE is cutting grants for research that includes certain keywords. Speaker 0: There are banned words that they're that they're cutting grants for any research that has. Two of the words are women and females cutting grants for any of the DDI research. Some of the suggestions are adult girl Uh-huh. X x. Like, how do Speaker 2: you you can't there's no Speaker 0: there's no way around that. Yeah. Woman is a ban. Man, male, men is a ban. Mhmm. Speaker 1: Here, the NIH counselor, James Welch, is coaching the applicant to change the wording of this application within NIH to avoid triggering what James Welch thinks is some type of algorithm, intentionally guiding the application process within NIH to circumvent government oversight. The problem, of course, with manipulating the language is this has nothing to do with science or technical excellence. Speaker 0: So I was trying to help her, like, suggest wording. Like, approved it, but we're like, maybe because our grants aren't getting canceled. Mhmm. Speaker 2: We're intramural, so we get to Speaker 0: do basically whatever we approve Yeah. And we get to do We have the money. Speaker 1: Intramural research refers to certain experiments happening within the walls of NIH's own buildings. Now James Welch says they can do basically anything as long as they have the money if it's intramural. Speaker 0: She's taking out the stratifying by race. And I'm like, yeah. So I I had to go and look at, like, what was leaked as far as the banned words that Doge is just, like, control f searching for Mhmm. And figure out what the suggestions that she used. Speaker 1: We spoke with a senior official in the administration regarding Doge. They've told us there's no real policy there except general prohibitions on racial preferences. We haven't been able to find or ascertain anything specifically regarding racial preferences in health. So this official within NIH appears to be conjuring this up or creating this algorithm in his own mind. Remember, the NIH is an executive branch agency. It's the US Department of Health and Human Services. This is an executive branch agency, and some say here he's circumventing the will of president Trump and Robert f Kennedy. Speaker 6: After experiencing four years of a volatile economy, America is facing record inflation and a massive threat to the US dollar. Experts are warning the stock market could crash, and we could be facing a recession. In these uncertain times, I recommend gold to my audience, and I trust Fisher Capital as my official gold partner. Not only have my friends at Fisher delivered hundreds of millions of dollars in gold to their clients, they've also proven to be vigilant and right on the front line supporting causes that make our country stronger and better. Fisher Capital is the largest corporate partner for Turning Point USA, close friends of OMG. We appear at their events every December and continues to make sure the new administration is successful. Based on my experience and client testimonials, the team at Fisher Capital consists of some of the most caring and compassionate individuals in finance today. And when you click the link, you will qualify for an exclusive offer only available to my listeners, where you can get up to $20,000 of free silver with your qualifying purchase. When you speak with Fisher, make sure to mention that James O'Keefe sent you. Our portfolios are too important to trust to stocks and bonds alone. Protect yourself with gold today, and get it from Fisher Capital. Go to Fisher0mg.com. That's Fisher0mg.com. Fisher 0 m g Com. Speaker 1: Referencing his conversations with this principal investigator at NIH, he says that they are changing the words from race in the application to ancestry. Of course, the problem with that is a matter of science was this was a racial study. Speaker 0: I'm like, just make it not the primary objective. Mhmm. Make it a secondary objective and change the word race to I suggested, like, if you see your ancestry instead of race. Speaker 1: Ancestry is not a criteria in the clinical research protocol. So that change that Welsh is proposing with his PI is misleading, some would say unethical, some might even call it a violation of the Hatch Act because it's introducing bias and political bias in what should be science. Speaker 0: Any discussion of side effects is like, you're you're you're an RKJ. You know what I mean? It's like, no. These things are affecting the body. Yeah. Not How do you feel about him taking over? His family will tell you he's the weird one. Speaker 5: Mhmm. You know? Speaker 1: Now this NIH official who doesn't hide his disdain for Doge also doesn't hide his disdain for his boss, Robert f Kennedy junior. Speaker 0: You know how he was always the weird cousin? Yeah. He's the weird cousin. Mhmm. The Kennedy's our core. They'll tell you that he's weary. He's not very far in charge of meditate. Speaker 1: He also says they should pull down president Trump's portrait within NIH and replace it with Russian president Putin's face. Speaker 0: They put up portraits of Trump's vance and RFK in the clinical center. Speaker 6: Somebody tore Speaker 0: him down immediately. Then they they hung them on the other side of the building near the Starbucks off of Boca TV, so they're too high for people to get to. Yeah. And so somebody, like, printed out rapist with an arrow and posted it next to Trump. And I was thinking that I should I should put on a portrait of Putin and put it upstream of Trump. Yeah. You know what I mean? Because it's clearly, like, Trump. Right? It's like this, like, hierarchy. How do you feel about with what Doge is doing and with the job cuts and everything? Yeah. So at NIH, it's gonna be 1,212 hundred. Which is devastating. I mean, it's crazy to fire future people, but it's, like, it only makes sense if they're doing whatever Putin wants. You know, it's just it seems to be very much Very, like against it's just against the best interests of our country. Speaker 1: The NIH genetic counselor within the NIH tells us on hidden camera that his mother told him not to shoot anybody, and Welch told our undercover journalist, quote, they won't let me close enough to these people at work at NIH. Speaker 0: Has anyone retaliated? Any any plans on retaliating? I appreciate that concept, and I tend to agree. My mom told me today that she were like, Speaker 3: you guys have Speaker 0: been buying guns. Uh-huh. But I'm like, they won't Speaker 4: let me close enough to Speaker 0: these people. Why are you buying guns? Just thinking about, like, worst case scenarios and being like, well, why not be prepared? You know Speaker 5: what mean? I just wanna go down like a bitch. Speaker 6: In recent months, many of our fellow Americans experienced unprecedented natural disasters and damaged infrastructure, making access to health care essentials impossible at the very moment it was needed. When disaster strikes, being prepared is your best defense. And now I'm excited to share with you the brand new field emergency kit from our friends at The Wellness Company. The ultimate survival kit for any situation where medical help is not an option. Inside this rugged waterproof case, you'll find essential medications that cover over 60 conditions that you can encounter along with a detailed 85 page doctor written guidebook. This ultimate kit includes amoxicillin, an essential for treating bacterial infections and antivirals and antiparasitics like hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, medications that are critical in situations we are exposed to respiratory viruses or parasites. And for those facing potentially life threatening allergic reactions, the field kit includes epinephrine, the generic EpiPen, along with vital first aid supplies such as tourniquet and wound and burn treatments. Natural disasters are happening at record rates, so I urge everyone to get the ultimate field emergency kit from our friends and supporters at The Wellness Company by going to TWC.health/OMG TWC Health / OMG that's twc.health/0mg. And now you can save 50% just by using code o m g at checkout. Speaker 1: So reporting outside this NIH facility in Bethesda, Maryland, this is James O'Keefe with o m g. If you're on the inside of these institutions, we wanna hear from you, who'll protect you, who'll tell your stories, it's important to have transparency and oversight within government to reform the government, who want accountability. And without accountability, our notion of freedom is just an illusion. Stay tuned.

@OKeefeMedia - O’Keefe Media Group

“I had to go and look at what was leaked as far as the banned words… and figure out what to suggest and choose,” admitted James Welch, a National Institutes of Health (@NIH) genetic counselor, revealing the extent to which he is coaching researchers to manipulate grant applications in order to bypass federal restrictions. Welch, who works at the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (@NIDDKgov), was caught on hidden camera explaining how he helps principal investigators (PIs) at the NIH adjust their wording to avoid scrutiny from government oversight bodies, including the Department of Government Efficiency (@DOGE). "There are banned words that they're [DOGE] cutting grants for… Two of the words are ‘women’ and ‘female,’" Welch revealed. Welch detailed how he actively advised a researcher to alter the language in a study on cortisol levels in Black and White women, ensuring it would not trigger red flags in the grant approval process. “Just make it not the primary objective, make it a secondary objective, and change the word ‘race’ to ‘ancestry,’” he advised. Welch also acknowledged that NIH’s intramural research programs face fewer barriers than extramural projects funded at universities, stating, “We can do it [microdialysis] if we have the money,” highlighting the power NIH insiders wield over approving their own research. Welch also made comments about purchasing firearms and potential retaliation against individuals at the NIH. “My mom told me today not to shoot anybody because I’ve been buying guns,” he remarked. When pressed about why he was purchasing firearms, Welch responded, “Just thinking about worst-case scenarios and being like, well, why not be prepared?” OMG has reached out to the NIH for comment regarding Welch’s statements. @ElonMusk

@OKeefeMedia - O’Keefe Media Group

https://t.co/nbRbqeCg3w

@JamesOKeefeIII - James O'Keefe

JUST IN: OMG has received a statement from the NIH addressing James Welch's comments on advising researchers to manipulate grant applications to bypass DOGE oversight: "NIH is taking action to terminate research funding that is not aligned with NIH and HHS priorities. We remain dedicated to restoring our agency to its tradition of upholding gold-standard, evidence-based science. As we begin to Make America Healthy Again, it's important to prioritize research that directly affects the health of Americans. We will leave no stone unturned in identifying the root causes of the chronic disease epidemic as part of our mission to Make America Healthy Again."

@JamesOKeefeIII - James O'Keefe

CAUGHT ON HIDDEN CAMERA: @NIH Genetic Counselor Tells Researchers to “Change ‘Race’ to ‘Ancestry’” in Clinical Trials to Evade @DOGE and Secure Funding; Admits to Wanting to Shoot People at NIH “My mom told me today not to shoot anybody… but they won't let me close enough to

Video Transcript AI Summary
An NIH genetic counselor, James Welch, was caught on hidden camera discussing strategies to manipulate language in research applications to circumvent government oversight, specifically from "Doge." Welch advises a principal investigator to change "race" to "ancestry" in a study on cortisol levels in black and white women, and to make race a secondary objective. He believes "Doge" is cutting grants for research using banned words like "women," "men," and "females." Welch claims intramural NIH research can "basically do whatever we approve" as long as they have the money. He expresses disdain for his boss, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., and suggests replacing Trump's portrait with Putin's. Welch mentions potential NIH job cuts and jokes about being prepared with guns, stating his mother told him not to shoot anyone, but "they won't let me close enough to these people."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Approving a protocol, a really interesting protocol of using this microdialysis and to test cortisol levels. One of our investigators wants to test it in women, black women, and white women. I I had to go and look at, like, what was leaked as far as the banned words that he was just, like, control f searching for. So I was trying to help her, like, suggest wording. I had suggested, like, I can see your ancestry instead of race. Speaker 1: James Welch is caught on our hidden camera talking about manipulating language to circumvent government oversight, specifically Doge oversight. Speaker 0: Our grants aren't getting canceled. Mhmm. We're intramural, so we get to do basically whatever we approve Yeah. And we get to do Speaker 1: certain experiment's happening within the walls of NIH's own buildings. They can do basically anything as long as they have the money. My mom told Speaker 0: me to lay that shit. Like, you guys have been buying guns. They won't let me Speaker 2: be close enough to these people. Speaker 1: The NIH genetic counselor within the NIH tells us on hidden camera that his mother told him not to shoot anybody. Speaker 0: Well, why not be prepared? I just wanna go down like a What are your views on it? You're asking me a lot of questions. I have not got a chance to ask your your questions. I was just thinking it'd be funny if you were, like, a government spy just like, what are we planning, James? Speaker 1: I'm James O'Keefe. You work with the NIH. This is you on camera. I heard you had a really bad day. You're about to have a worse day. I'm James O'Keefe here outside Washington DC standing outside the headquarters of the National Institute of Health, NIH. It's within this building that a man named James Welch works. He's the genetic counselor and research coordinator for NDDK. That's National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases. It appears in this undercover video that Welch and the PI, that's principal investigator he's working with, is counseling are seeking allowance on a clinical trial regarding using microdialysis to test cortisol levels in black and white women for research. Speaker 0: I work both with the patients and then also with, like, the the PIs, the the principal investigators writing their studies, running their studies. For our institute, I'm one of the people who approach both. You know? Yeah. Like, oh, this is a good study. Like, yesterday, I was approving a protocol, a really interesting protocol using this microdialysis to test cortisol levels. One of our investigators wants to test it in women, black women, and white women. People are stratified by whether you have metabolic dysfunction and whether you're African American or Yeah. A a white woman. Speaker 1: Where things get interesting is the political bias that James Welch, genetics counselor, appears to be injecting into the process to circumvent government oversight, specifically Doge oversight. He specifically calls out Doge, says that DOGE is cutting grants for research that includes certain keywords. Speaker 0: There are banned words that they're that they're cutting grants for any research that has. Two of the words are women and females cutting grants for any of the DDI research. Some of the suggestions are adult girl Uh-huh. X x. Like, how do you you can't there's no there's no way around that. Yeah. Woman is a ban. Man, male, men is a ban. Mhmm. Speaker 1: Here, the NIH counselor, James Welch, is coaching the applicant to change the wording of this application within NIH to avoid triggering what James Welch thinks is some type of algorithm, intentionally guiding the application process within NIH to circumvent government oversight. The problem, of course, with manipulating the language is this has nothing to do with science or technical excellence. Speaker 0: So I was trying to help her, like, suggest wording. Like, approved it, but we're like, maybe because our grants aren't getting canceled. Mhmm. We're intramural, so we get to do basically whatever we approve Yeah. And we get to do We have the money. Speaker 1: Intramural research refers to certain experiments happening within the walls of NIH's own buildings. Now James Welch says they can do basically anything as long as they have the money if it's intramural. Speaker 0: She's taking out the stratifying by race. And I'm like, yeah. So I I had to go and look at, like, what was leaked as far as the banned words that Doge is just, like, control f searching for Mhmm. And figure out what the suggestions that she used. Speaker 1: We spoke with a senior official in the administration regarding Doge. They've told us there's no real policy there except general prohibitions on racial preferences. We haven't been able to find or ascertain anything specifically regarding racial preferences in health. So this official within NIH appears to be conjuring this up or creating this algorithm in his own mind. Remember, the NIH is an executive branch agency. It's the US Department of Health and Human Services. This is an executive branch agency, and some say here he's circumventing the will of president Trump and Robert f Kennedy. Speaker 3: After experiencing four years of a volatile economy, America is facing record inflation and a massive threat to the US dollar. Experts are warning the stock market could crash, and we could be facing a recession. In these uncertain times, I recommend gold to my audience, and I trust Fisher Capital as my official gold partner. Not only have my friends at Fisher delivered hundreds of millions of dollars in gold to their clients, they've also proven to be vigilant and right on the front line supporting causes that make our country stronger and better. Fisher Capital is the largest corporate partner for Turning Point USA, close friends of OMG. We appear at their events every December and continues to make sure the new administration is successful. Based on my experience and client testimonials, the team at Fisher Capital consists of some of the most caring and compassionate individuals in finance today. And when you click the link, you will qualify for an exclusive offer only available to my listeners, where you can get up to $20,000 of free silver with your qualifying purchase. When you speak with Fisher, make sure to mention that James O'Keefe sent you. Our portfolios are too important to trust to stocks and bonds alone. Protect yourself with gold today, and get it from Fisher Capital. Go to Fisher0mg.com. That's Fisher0mg.com. Fisher 0 m g Com. Speaker 1: Referencing his conversations with this principal investigator at NIH, he says that they are changing the words from race in the application to ancestry. Of course, the problem with that is a matter of science was this was a racial study. Speaker 0: I'm like, just make it not the primary objective. Mhmm. Make it a secondary objective and change the word race to I suggested, like, if you see your ancestry instead of race. Speaker 1: Ancestry is not a criteria in the clinical research protocol. So that change that Welsh is proposing with his PI is misleading, some would say unethical, some might even call it a violation of the Hatch Act because it's introducing bias and political bias in what should be science. Speaker 0: Any discussion of side effects is like, you're you're you're an RKJ. You know what I mean? It's like, no. These things are affecting the body. Yeah. Not How do you feel about him taking over? His family will tell you he's the weird one. Mhmm. You know? Speaker 1: Now this NIH official who doesn't hide his disdain for Doge also doesn't hide his disdain for his boss, Robert f Kennedy junior. Speaker 0: You know how he was always the weird cousin? Yeah. He's the weird cousin. Mhmm. The Kennedy's our core. They'll tell you that he's weary. He's not very far in charge of meditate. Speaker 1: He also says they should pull down president Trump's portrait within NIH and replace it with Russian president Putin's face. Speaker 0: They put up portraits of Trump's vance and RFK in the clinical center. Speaker 3: Somebody tore Speaker 0: him down immediately. Then they they hung them on the other side of the building near the Starbucks off of Boca TV, so they're too high for people to get to. Yeah. And so somebody, like, printed out rapist with an arrow and posted it next to Trump. And I was thinking that I should I should put on a portrait of Putin and put it upstream of Trump. Yeah. You know what I mean? Because it's clearly, like, Trump. Right? It's like this, like, hierarchy. How do you feel about with what Doge is doing and with the job cuts and everything? Yeah. So at NIH, it's gonna be 1,212 hundred. Which is devastating. I mean, it's crazy to fire future people, but it's, like, it only makes sense if they're doing whatever Putin wants. You know, it's just it seems to be very much Very, like against it's just against the best interests of our country. Speaker 1: The NIH genetic counselor within the NIH tells us on hidden camera that his mother told him not to shoot anybody, and Welch told our undercover journalist, quote, they won't let me close enough to these people at work at NIH. Speaker 0: Has anyone retaliated? Any any plans on retaliating? I appreciate that concept, and I tend to agree. My mom told me today that she were like, you guys have been buying guns. Uh-huh. But I'm like, they won't Speaker 2: let me close enough to Speaker 0: these people. Why are you buying guns? Just thinking about, like, worst case scenarios and being like, well, why not be prepared? You know what mean? I just wanna go down like a bitch. Speaker 3: In recent months, many of our fellow Americans experienced unprecedented natural disasters and damaged infrastructure, making access to health care essentials impossible at the very moment it was needed. When disaster strikes, being prepared is your best defense. And now I'm excited to share with you the brand new field emergency kit from our friends at The Wellness Company. The ultimate survival kit for any situation where medical help is not an option. Inside this rugged waterproof case, you'll find essential medications that cover over 60 conditions that you can encounter along with a detailed 85 page doctor written guidebook. This ultimate kit includes amoxicillin, an essential for treating bacterial infections and antivirals and antiparasitics like hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, medications that are critical in situations we are exposed to respiratory viruses or parasites. And for those facing potentially life threatening allergic reactions, the field kit includes epinephrine, the generic EpiPen, along with vital first aid supplies such as tourniquet and wound and burn treatments. Natural disasters are happening at record rates, so I urge everyone to get the ultimate field emergency kit from our friends and supporters at The Wellness Company by going to TWC.health/OMG TWC Health / OMG that's twc.health/0mg. And now you can save 50% just by using code o m g at checkout. Speaker 1: So reporting outside this NIH facility in Bethesda, Maryland, this is James O'Keefe with o m g. If you're on the inside of these institutions, we wanna hear from you, who'll protect you, who'll tell your stories, it's important to have transparency and oversight within government to reform the government, who want accountability. And without accountability, our notion of freedom is just an illusion. Stay tuned.
Saved - April 3, 2025 at 7:54 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I received a statement from the NIH regarding James Welch's remarks on manipulating grant applications to avoid DOGE oversight. The NIH is taking steps to terminate funding for research that doesn't align with its priorities. They emphasize their commitment to evidence-based science and the mission to improve American health. The agency aims to identify the root causes of the chronic disease epidemic as part of their initiative to Make America Healthy Again.

@JamesOKeefeIII - James O'Keefe

JUST IN: OMG has received a statement from the NIH addressing James Welch's comments on advising researchers to manipulate grant applications to bypass DOGE oversight: "NIH is taking action to terminate research funding that is not aligned with NIH and HHS priorities. We remain dedicated to restoring our agency to its tradition of upholding gold-standard, evidence-based science. As we begin to Make America Healthy Again, it's important to prioritize research that directly affects the health of Americans. We will leave no stone unturned in identifying the root causes of the chronic disease epidemic as part of our mission to Make America Healthy Again."

@JamesOKeefeIII - James O'Keefe

CAUGHT ON HIDDEN CAMERA: @NIH Genetic Counselor Tells Researchers to “Change ‘Race’ to ‘Ancestry’” in Clinical Trials to Evade @DOGE and Secure Funding; Admits to Wanting to Shoot People at NIH “My mom told me today not to shoot anybody… but they won't let me close enough to these f*cking people.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
James O'Keefe reports on James Welch, a genetic counselor at the NIH, who appears to be manipulating language in research applications to circumvent government oversight, specifically from "Doge," by avoiding "banned words" like "women" and "race." Welch suggests using "ancestry" instead of "race" and making race a secondary objective. According to O'Keefe, this circumvention introduces political bias into science and could be a Hatch Act violation. Welch expresses disdain for Robert F. Kennedy Jr., his boss, and suggests replacing Trump's portrait with Putin's. He mentions potential NIH job cuts due to "Doge" and references his mother advising against violence, stating he is kept too far from people at work.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Approving a protocol, a really interesting protocol of using this microdialysis and to test cortisol levels. One of our investigators wants to test it in women, black women, and white women. I I had to go and look at, like, what was leaked as far as the banned words that he was just, like, control f searching for. So I was trying to help her, like, suggest wording. I had suggested, like, I can see your ancestry instead of race. Speaker 1: James Welch is caught on our hidden camera talking about manipulating language to circumvent government oversight, specifically Doge oversight. Speaker 0: Our grants aren't getting canceled. Mhmm. We're intramural, so we get to do basically whatever we approve Yeah. And we get to do Speaker 1: certain experiment's happening within the walls of NIH's own buildings. They can do basically anything as long as they have the money. My mom told Speaker 0: me to lay that shit. Like, you guys have been buying guns. They won't let me Speaker 2: be close enough to these people. Speaker 1: The NIH genetic counselor within the NIH tells us on hidden camera that his mother told him not to shoot anybody. Speaker 0: Well, why not be prepared? I just wanna go down like a What are your views on it? You're asking me a lot of questions. I have not got a chance to ask your your questions. I was just thinking it'd be funny if you were, like, a government spy just like, what are we planning, James? Speaker 1: I'm James O'Keefe. You work with the NIH. This is you on camera. I heard you had a really bad day. You're about to have a worse day. I'm James O'Keefe here outside Washington DC standing outside the headquarters of the National Institute of Health, NIH. It's within this building that a man named James Welch works. He's the genetic counselor and research coordinator for NDDK. That's National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases. It appears in this undercover video that Welch and the PI, that's principal investigator he's working with, is counseling are seeking allowance on a clinical trial regarding using microdialysis to test cortisol levels in black and white women for research. Speaker 0: I work both with the patients and then also with, like, the the PIs, the the principal investigators writing their studies, running their studies. For our institute, I'm one of the people who approach both. You know? Yeah. Like, oh, this is a good study. Like, yesterday, I was approving a protocol, a really interesting protocol using this microdialysis to test cortisol levels. One of our investigators wants to test it in women, black women, and white women. People are stratified by whether you have metabolic dysfunction and whether you're African American or Yeah. A a white woman. Speaker 1: Where things get interesting is the political bias that James Welch, genetics counselor, appears to be injecting into the process to circumvent government oversight, specifically Doge oversight. He specifically calls out Doge, says that DOGE is cutting grants for research that includes certain keywords. Speaker 0: There are banned words that they're that they're cutting grants for any research that has. Two of the words are women and females cutting grants for any of the DDI research. Some of the suggestions are adult girl Uh-huh. X x. Like, how do you you can't there's no there's no way around that. Yeah. Woman is a ban. Man, male, men is a ban. Mhmm. Speaker 1: Here, the NIH counselor, James Welch, is coaching the applicant to change the wording of this application within NIH to avoid triggering what James Welch thinks is some type of algorithm, intentionally guiding the application process within NIH to circumvent government oversight. The problem, of course, with manipulating the language is this has nothing to do with science or technical excellence. Speaker 0: So I was trying to help her, like, suggest wording. Like, approved it, but we're like, maybe because our grants aren't getting canceled. Mhmm. We're intramural, so we get to do basically whatever we approve Yeah. And we get to do We have the money. Speaker 1: Intramural research refers to certain experiments happening within the walls of NIH's own buildings. Now James Welch says they can do basically anything as long as they have the money if it's intramural. Speaker 0: She's taking out the stratifying by race. And I'm like, yeah. So I I had to go and look at, like, what was leaked as far as the banned words that Doge is just, like, control f searching for Mhmm. And figure out what the suggestions that she used. Speaker 1: We spoke with a senior official in the administration regarding Doge. They've told us there's no real policy there except general prohibitions on racial preferences. We haven't been able to find or ascertain anything specifically regarding racial preferences in health. So this official within NIH appears to be conjuring this up or creating this algorithm in his own mind. Remember, the NIH is an executive branch agency. It's the US Department of Health and Human Services. This is an executive branch agency, and some say here he's circumventing the will of president Trump and Robert f Kennedy. Speaker 3: After experiencing four years of a volatile economy, America is facing record inflation and a massive threat to the US dollar. Experts are warning the stock market could crash, and we could be facing a recession. In these uncertain times, I recommend gold to my audience, and I trust Fisher Capital as my official gold partner. Not only have my friends at Fisher delivered hundreds of millions of dollars in gold to their clients, they've also proven to be vigilant and right on the front line supporting causes that make our country stronger and better. Fisher Capital is the largest corporate partner for Turning Point USA, close friends of OMG. We appear at their events every December and continues to make sure the new administration is successful. Based on my experience and client testimonials, the team at Fisher Capital consists of some of the most caring and compassionate individuals in finance today. And when you click the link, you will qualify for an exclusive offer only available to my listeners, where you can get up to $20,000 of free silver with your qualifying purchase. When you speak with Fisher, make sure to mention that James O'Keefe sent you. Our portfolios are too important to trust to stocks and bonds alone. Protect yourself with gold today, and get it from Fisher Capital. Go to Fisher0mg.com. That's Fisher0mg.com. Fisher 0 m g Com. Speaker 1: Referencing his conversations with this principal investigator at NIH, he says that they are changing the words from race in the application to ancestry. Of course, the problem with that is a matter of science was this was a racial study. Speaker 0: I'm like, just make it not the primary objective. Mhmm. Make it a secondary objective and change the word race to I suggested, like, if you see your ancestry instead of race. Speaker 1: Ancestry is not a criteria in the clinical research protocol. So that change that Welsh is proposing with his PI is misleading, some would say unethical, some might even call it a violation of the Hatch Act because it's introducing bias and political bias in what should be science. Speaker 0: Any discussion of side effects is like, you're you're you're an RKJ. You know what I mean? It's like, no. These things are affecting the body. Yeah. Not How do you feel about him taking over? His family will tell you he's the weird one. Mhmm. You know? Speaker 1: Now this NIH official who doesn't hide his disdain for Doge also doesn't hide his disdain for his boss, Robert f Kennedy junior. Speaker 0: You know how he was always the weird cousin? Yeah. He's the weird cousin. Mhmm. The Kennedy's our core. They'll tell you that he's weary. He's not very far in charge of meditate. Speaker 1: He also says they should pull down president Trump's portrait within NIH and replace it with Russian president Putin's face. Speaker 0: They put up portraits of Trump's vance and RFK in the clinical center. Speaker 3: Somebody tore Speaker 0: him down immediately. Then they they hung them on the other side of the building near the Starbucks off of Boca TV, so they're too high for people to get to. Yeah. And so somebody, like, printed out rapist with an arrow and posted it next to Trump. And I was thinking that I should I should put on a portrait of Putin and put it upstream of Trump. Yeah. You know what I mean? Because it's clearly, like, Trump. Right? It's like this, like, hierarchy. How do you feel about with what Doge is doing and with the job cuts and everything? Yeah. So at NIH, it's gonna be 1,212 hundred. Which is devastating. I mean, it's crazy to fire future people, but it's, like, it only makes sense if they're doing whatever Putin wants. You know, it's just it seems to be very much Very, like against it's just against the best interests of our country. Speaker 1: The NIH genetic counselor within the NIH tells us on hidden camera that his mother told him not to shoot anybody, and Welch told our undercover journalist, quote, they won't let me close enough to these people at work at NIH. Speaker 0: Has anyone retaliated? Any any plans on retaliating? I appreciate that concept, and I tend to agree. My mom told me today that she were like, you guys have been buying guns. Uh-huh. But I'm like, they won't Speaker 2: let me close enough to Speaker 0: these people. Why are you buying guns? Just thinking about, like, worst case scenarios and being like, well, why not be prepared? You know what mean? I just wanna go down like a bitch. Speaker 3: In recent months, many of our fellow Americans experienced unprecedented natural disasters and damaged infrastructure, making access to health care essentials impossible at the very moment it was needed. When disaster strikes, being prepared is your best defense. And now I'm excited to share with you the brand new field emergency kit from our friends at The Wellness Company. The ultimate survival kit for any situation where medical help is not an option. Inside this rugged waterproof case, you'll find essential medications that cover over 60 conditions that you can encounter along with a detailed 85 page doctor written guidebook. This ultimate kit includes amoxicillin, an essential for treating bacterial infections and antivirals and antiparasitics like hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, medications that are critical in situations we are exposed to respiratory viruses or parasites. And for those facing potentially life threatening allergic reactions, the field kit includes epinephrine, the generic EpiPen, along with vital first aid supplies such as tourniquet and wound and burn treatments. Natural disasters are happening at record rates, so I urge everyone to get the ultimate field emergency kit from our friends and supporters at The Wellness Company by going to TWC.health/OMG TWC Health / OMG that's twc.health/0mg. And now you can save 50% just by using code o m g at checkout. Speaker 1: So reporting outside this NIH facility in Bethesda, Maryland, this is James O'Keefe with o m g. If you're on the inside of these institutions, we wanna hear from you, who'll protect you, who'll tell your stories, it's important to have transparency and oversight within government to reform the government, who want accountability. And without accountability, our notion of freedom is just an illusion. Stay tuned.
Saved - May 21, 2025 at 11:25 PM

@DonaldJTrumpJr - Donald Trump Jr.

What I want to know is how did Dr. Jill Biden miss stage five metastatic cancer or is this yet another coverup??? https://t.co/fSqtDmcX4p

Saved - June 11, 2025 at 11:38 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I recently listened to Dr. Jay Bhattacharya on Andrew Huberman's podcast, where he shared eye-opening insights about health, autism research, and the medical establishment. He discussed how his university tried to silence him, the alarming rise in autism rates without clear explanations, and the replication crisis in scientific studies. He emphasized the need for unbiased investigations into autism causes and highlighted the stagnation of American life expectancy. His reform agenda aims to challenge established norms in science and healthcare.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Dr. Jay Battacharya just spent 4.5 hours on Andrew Huberman's podcast discussing health. He revealed mind-blowing facts about autism research, vaccine safety, & how our medical establishment really works... Here are 8 of his most shocking insights: 🧵 https://t.co/UMX3dmhI9n

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

1/ His Own University Tried to Silence Him Stanford's dean directly told Bhattacharya to stop speaking to the press during COVID. They even "ordered him to redo" his immunity study when they didn't like the results. "Stanford failed the academic freedom test," he said. https://t.co/42lWFisG9P

Video Transcript AI Summary
In 2020, the speaker was asked to stop going on the press by the dean of the university and the dean of the medical school. The speaker's academic freedom was threatened due to a study on measuring antibodies in the population, which has now been replicated globally. The speaker was ordered to redo the study, and the medical school administration interfered even before the paper was submitted for publication. The speaker wrote about how Stanford failed the academic freedom test.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So I was asked to stop going on the press in 2020. I was by the dean of the university, dean of the medical school, right? My academic freedom was pretty directly threatened. I wrote and published a study on measuring antibodies in the population, a study that's now replicated dozens of times around the world, and I was essentially ordered to redo that study. They interfered even before I had sent the paper in for publication. When I say they, I mean the administration of the medical school. I mean, my academic freedom was pretty directly attacked, And and I wrote a piece with how Stanford failed the academic freedom test. You can go read about read read it for folks who wanna read about it.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

2/ Autism Rates Have Exploded and Nobody Knows Why 1 in 31 kids now has autism according to the CDC. Bhattacharya's shocking admission: "Everyone has their pet theory for why and yet we don't know why. I as a scientist do not know the answer." But here's where it gets crazy... https://t.co/JnSPRBIZNd

Video Transcript AI Summary
The discussion addresses whether vaccines cause autism and whether relevant agencies will investigate this. Regarding the MMR vaccine, studies have failed to find a causal link to autism, including a large Danish study comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated children over years, which showed no difference in autism rates. For other vaccines like polio, there's less research specifically examining links to autism. While the speaker doesn't know the full literature extent, they haven't seen the same level of evidence for vaccines other than MMR. Biologically, it's considered unlikely that vaccines are the main reason for the documented rise in autism.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So what is the evidence, if any, that a vaccine, some specific vaccine, causes autism? And is the NIH and CDC and the new administration going to take a serious look at this? Speaker 1: Yeah, so I don't want to comment on the Wakefield situation, because I don't know the ins and outs of it. Speaker 0: All we know is what happened. He lost his medical And Speaker 1: I'd say, like, we're talking about one study, right? I believe that replication matters. And so like, there are, I think, on the MMR vaccine, some excellent studies that fail to find correlation, or a causal link between MMR vaccination, Speaker 0: and measles, rubella. Speaker 1: Measles, mumps, rubella, a vaccine that's really, I think, important for the childhood, for kids, and autism. Like there's a massive Danish study that tracks patients who are vaccinated, kids who are vaccinated, matched with patients, similar patients who are not, tracks them for a year or longer, years, and finds no difference. Okay. Or fails to find a difference in autism rates. There's people who've, I mean there's all kinds of, if you look online and elsewhere, there's all kinds of fights over that, but to me, that's pretty good evidence, you know, for the MRR vaccine. For some of the other vaccines, there's been less of a focus to ask whether it's correlated to vaccine. Speaker 0: Such as Speaker 1: polio vaccine? Don't don't know this literature, so I shouldn't comment, but I don't I don't I don't remember seeing a study specifically asking whether the polio vaccine is linked to autism. Speaker 0: When I was growing up, every kid got the polio vaccine. Yeah. Measles, mumps, rubella Speaker 1: I think there's and DPT. Yeah. Speaker 0: Yeah. And and a and a couple others. Like, there were probably four or five vaccines, as I recall. Speaker 1: I think that there's good evidence on the MMR vaccine that failing to find a link with autism. There's and I don't know the full extent of this literature, I shouldn't comment too much, but I don't I when I've looked, I haven't seen quite the same level of evidence for some of the other vaccines, haven't again, they just haven't looked. As a general matter, I think it's an unlikely, just from a biological point of view, unlikely to be the main reason why you autism, the rise in autism, which is now well documented that you talked about, has occurred.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

3/ Most Scientific Studies Can't Be Replicated The replication crisis is so bad that drug companies do their own private studies because "they don't trust the published biomedical literature." Translation: Most medical research is junk. https://t.co/YsQstG8Cln

Video Transcript AI Summary
A Stanford scientist, John Iannidis, wrote a convincing paper in 2005 titled, Why Most Published Biomedical Papers Are False. The reasoning is not due to scientific fraud, but because science is difficult. When a statistically significant result is published, such as P equals 0.05, it means that some percentage of the time, the result will be false, even after peer review. Peer review involves colleagues reading the paper and looking for logical flaws, but not rerunning experiments or reanalyzing data. Peer review is not a guarantee of truth. Given the inherent difficulty of science, any published result has a high likelihood of being a false positive.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: A colleague of ours at Stanford named John Iannidis, he wrote a paper in 02/2005. Absolutely brilliant scientist, think the most highly cited scientist, living scientist in the world, right? So he wrote a paper in 2005 with the title, Why Most Published Biomedical Papers Are False. I mean, when you make a title like that for a scientific paper, it better be convincing. And in just a few pages, it's an utterly convincing paper. And it's not because scientists commit fraud, that's not the reasoning behind it. Because science is hard. It's exactly in the hard and exactly the way you just said, Andrew. So you publish a result, you believe it to be true, you have some statistically significant result at some level, we say P equals point zero five, what does that mean? That some percentage of the time, even though you believe the result is true, it's been peer reviewed by your colleagues. The peer review actually doesn't involve, as you know, peer reviewers taking your data, rerunning your experiments, it doesn't mean any of that. They just read your paper, looked for logical flaws, didn't find any, and then they recommended the editor to be published. So the peer review is not a guarantee that it's true. You have some significance that say that your data meet. Even with that, some percentage of the time, the published result is going to be false. Now, if you think of science, a priori is hard. Any result that you publish is most likely going to be a false positive result.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

4/ Americans Are the World's "Piggy Bank" for Drug Research "American taxpayers are the piggy bank for the world," Bhattacharya revealed. Pharmacy benefit managers inflate prices while Europe pays "marginal costs." Time to cut out the middlemen. https://t.co/YLUJhuZwP2

Video Transcript AI Summary
American taxpayers fund basic and late-stage clinical research for the entire world, largely through the NIH. While Europe and private foundations contribute, the NIH is the single largest global investor in basic science and applied research. Higher U.S. drug prices also fund the phase three trials and R&D efforts conducted by drug companies. Therefore, American taxpayers are essentially the world's piggy bank for almost all of the research pipeline.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So the taxpayers in The United States are funding the basic research, and the clinical late stage research Yes. For the entire world? Speaker 1: Yes. In large part. I mean, like Europe does have some institutions that invest in, you know, in basic research, so it's not entirely zero, and there are of course private foundations that do it, but through the NIH, that's the single largest investment in basic science research in the world, and through, and also applied research. And also, by higher drug prices in The United States relative to the rest of the world, we are funding the phase three trials, all the research and development efforts that happened at the tail end of the research pipeline, that the drug companies do. So essentially, American taxpayers are the piggy bank for the world, for almost all of this research pipeline. Speaker 0: Wow. Okay.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

5/ He's Launching a Massive, Unbiased Autism Investigation The NIH is starting a major initiative to investigate ALL potential causes of autism. Environmental factors, nutrition, vaccines, everything is on the table. No predetermined conclusions. https://t.co/72h7oAerkZ

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker believes there hasn't been an open-minded investigation into the etiology of autism because it's dangerous for scientists to ask the question. They risk being incorrectly labeled as "anti-vaxxers," which could end their careers. This suppression of scientific curiosity prevents finding answers. The speaker has organized an initiative within the NIH to address the question of autism's etiology in a wide-ranging manner, not limited to vaccines.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The right thing to do in that setting is to have an open minded investigation to try to address this problem. And that question is, why haven't we had that so far? And I'll tell you, I think the reason we have not had the kind of open minded, deep investigation by the scientific community at large on the ideology that the parents deserve, the kids deserve, is because it's dangerous to ask that question if you're a scientist. All of sudden you're to be accused, often incorrectly, of being an anti vaxxer. And that's the end of your scientific career. That kind of sort of suppression of scientific curiosity means that we don't we won't have an answer to this question. Like, so, right, so what I've done is I've organized an initiative inside the NIH to address this question of the etiology of autism. Not limited to vaccines? No. Wide ranging

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

6/ American Life Expectancy Was Stagnant Even Before COVID While European nations saw health gains, American life expectancy was "almost entirely flat" from 2012-2019. Despite billions in healthcare spending, we're not actually improving American health outcomes. https://t.co/GozTKolY66

Video Transcript AI Summary
Since 2012, American life expectancy has stagnated, while European countries saw increases. The U.S. experienced a sharp drop during the pandemic, only recovering to 2019 levels last year. Sweden's life expectancy dropped in 2020 but quickly rebounded, continuing its upward trend. Current national investments in research aren't translating into improved health and longevity for Americans. Biomedical advances are treating previously untreatable diseases, but they aren't addressing the chronic disease and longevity crises. The next generation may live shorter, less healthy lives than their parents.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Right, so you can see this in the, since 2012, there's been no increase in American life expectancy. From 2012 to 2019, literally, it was, well, not literally, almost entirely flat life expectancy. Whereas the European countries had advances in life expectancy during that period. During the pandemic, life expectancy dropped very sharply in The United States, and only just last year did it come back up to 2019 levels. In Sweden, the life expectancy dropped in 2020, then came right back up by 2021, 2022, to the previous trend of increasing life expectancy. Whatever those investments we're making as a nation, in the research, are not actually translating into meeting the mission of the NIH, which is to advance health and longevity of the American people. Right? We've had some tremendous biomedical advances that have now allowed us to treat diseases that were previously untreatable. But, which is great, that's a good thing. But it's not, actually, far as the broad health of the American public, address the chronic disease crisis that we face, or address the crisis in longevity that we face. The next generation of kids, our kids, are likely to live shorter, less healthy lives than we have lived as parents.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

7/ They Covered Up COVID's Origins Scientific institutions should "come clean" about federal money potentially funding COVID-19 origin research. The government even banned NIH contractor EcoHealth Alliance for failing to oversee the Wuhan lab. https://t.co/ikdIhv1mbs

Video Transcript AI Summary
A speaker states that a large segment of the public feels betrayed by scientists who won't admit fault regarding COVID-19. They want to know why they were lied to and no longer care about lab funding. The speaker asks what the scientific community needs to say about lockdowns, masks, and vaccines to restore trust. Another speaker responds that they were a vocal advocate against lockdowns, mask mandates, vaccine mandates, and the anti-scientific approach of public health during the pandemic. They also believe that scientific institutions should be transparent about their involvement in dangerous research that may have caused the pandemic, referring to the lab leak hypothesis.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And so it's almost like big segments of the public feel like they caught us in something and as scientists, and we won't admit it. And they're not just pissed off. They're kinda like done. They I hear it all the time. And again, this isn't the health and wellness supplement taking, know, anti woke crowd. This is a big segment of the population that is like, I don't wanna hear about it. I don't care if labs get funded. I wanna know why we were lied to, or the scientific community can't admit fault. I just wanna land that message for them, because in part I'm here for them, and get your thoughts on what you think about, let's start with lockdowns, masks, and vaccines, just to keep it easy. And what do you think the scientific community needs to say in light of those to restore trust? Speaker 1: So let me just say I don't think I'm the NIH director unless that were true. Unless what you said is true. Otherwise, I'm not the NIH director. So I was a very vocal advocate against the lockdowns, against the mask mandates, against the vaccine mandates, and against the sort of anti scientific bent of public health throughout the pandemic. I've also argued that the scientific institutions of this country should should come clean about our involvement in very dangerous research that potentially caused the pandemic. Speaker 0: The so called lab leak hypothesis.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

8/ Young Scientists Drive Innovation, But the System Crushes Them Bhattacharya's research proves young scientists are the most innovative. Yet the system forces them to serve established scientists for decades. His plan: Redirect funding to young investigators. https://t.co/f9wQnRMCRp

Video Transcript AI Summary
Early career scientists today wait longer for support to test their ideas compared to the 1980s. This delay impacts innovation, as early career scientists are more likely to explore novel ideas in their published work. Research indicates a direct correlation between the time since earning a PhD and the novelty of ideas presented. Specifically, the likelihood of incorporating new ideas in published papers decreases with each year following the completion of a PhD. The age of ideas scientists work on increases by approximately one year for every chronological year after earning their PhD.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Early career scientists take much longer now to be able to get support to test their ideas out than they did in the 1980s. This is important for innovation, because it turns out that this is another paper that I published before the pandemic it turns out that it's early career scientists that are most likely to try out new ideas in their work, in their published work. Right? So, in fact, this is depressing, but for me, as with a man with gray hair, but like, it's monotonic. Like the year after your PhD is when you're most likely to have newer ideas in your papers, and then every year after that, for every single year of chronological age, the age of the ideas you tend to work on tends to increase by about a year.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

The transformation is already happening... Bhattacharya froze 80% of NIH's budget and laid off over 1,000 employees. University funding is being slashed from 50-60% down to 15%. He's shifting focus from infectious diseases to chronic diseases affecting every American family.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

His reform agenda is radical: → Investigating taboo topics like vaccine injuries and autism causes → Breaking up the scientific "old boys club" → Prioritizing replication over flashy new research → Cutting pharmaceutical middlemen → Restoring transparency to public health

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Thanks for reading. A bit about me: • I'm a 2x author • Former White House Presidential Innovation Fellow • 3X exited founder/CEO of venture-backed tech startups Follow for insights on AI, politics, and spirituality.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Thank you for reading! If you enjoyed this post, follow @karlmehta for more content on AI and spirituality. Repost the first tweet to help more people see it: Appreciate the support.

@karlmehta - Karl Mehta

Dr. Jay Battacharya just spent 4.5 hours on Andrew Huberman's podcast discussing health. He revealed mind-blowing facts about autism research, vaccine safety, & how our medical establishment really works... Here are 8 of his most shocking insights: 🧵 https://t.co/UMX3dmhI9n

Saved - June 30, 2025 at 5:40 PM

@DavidWolfe - David Wolfe

https://t.co/259yKhpwci

Saved - July 16, 2025 at 8:31 PM

@SenEricSchmitt - Senator Eric Schmitt

This is the CEO of NPR. Our tax dollars should not be paying her salary. Tomorrow, I'm leading the Senate package to end taxpayer funding for NPR. https://t.co/7XVNzpIMKs

Saved - August 2, 2025 at 2:14 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared a shocking story about a 13-year-old girl in Alabama who was declared "brain-dead" but woke up just before organ harvesting. This raises serious concerns about the accuracy of such diagnoses and the potential for financial incentives in organ donation. I questioned how many similar cases exist and highlighted the troubling reality that this situation is part of a larger, profit-driven industry. Many others echoed my sentiments, expressing disbelief and concern over the ethics of organ donation practices and the intersection of money and medicine.

@catsscareme2021 - Jessica Rojas 🇺🇸💪

Imagine being 13… declared "brain-dead"… and waking up right before they cut you open for your organs. This isn’t a horror movie. It happened. A 13-year-old Alabama girl was set to become an organ donor. Her family was told she was gone forever. Machines were prepped, surgeons ready. Then-she moved. She opened her eyes. She LIVED. Doctors said she was "brain-dead." They were wrong. How many others have been silenced, buried, or cut open alive… all because of faulty tests and a rush to harvest? If you think hospitals don’t have financial incentives when it comes to organ donation, think again. Every single time a case like this emerges, officials say ‘protocol wasn’t followed.’ How many times do we need to hear that before we question the system itself?

@catsscareme2021 - Jessica Rojas 🇺🇸💪

How many people have to move, cry, or wake up right before organ harvesting before we call it what it is? This isn’t medicine- it’s a billion-dollar industry built on greed and deception.

@catsscareme2021 - Jessica Rojas 🇺🇸💪

@GenBelisarius That describes it perfectly, unfortunately 😕

@catsscareme2021 - Jessica Rojas 🇺🇸💪

@DrWojakMD I remember reading this on FB several years ago. It was my first wake up call regarding organ donation.. scary.

@catsscareme2021 - Jessica Rojas 🇺🇸💪

@SeanBFlanagan Too many! And they always call these "mistakes"

@catsscareme2021 - Jessica Rojas 🇺🇸💪

@fubots1 Smart! 🙏

@catsscareme2021 - Jessica Rojas 🇺🇸💪

@joe4deadcat It is! Did you ever watch the video with the Doctor who admits "brain death" is a lie?

@catsscareme2021 - Jessica Rojas 🇺🇸💪

@Kelly4Infowars I agree. The body will either reject the organs or it destroys their bodies because of the massive drugs they need to be on..

@catsscareme2021 - Jessica Rojas 🇺🇸💪

@boytzun You're very right ✅ it's like programmed robots who have been taught since childhood to obey, memorize, sit still and never question "authority" I get it.

@catsscareme2021 - Jessica Rojas 🇺🇸💪

@kristi10442 This is absolutely heartbreaking. I can’t imagine how that moment must stay with you. Thank you for sharing something so personal—your story matters, and I’m so sorry you had to go through that. 🙏

@catsscareme2021 - Jessica Rojas 🇺🇸💪

@suezq7369 Yes, they made a killing in many different ways during Covid, sadly.

@catsscareme2021 - Jessica Rojas 🇺🇸💪

@asamomma1 You're on to something.. Money, politics, and opaque policy can intersect dangerously in medicine.

Saved - September 5, 2025 at 11:12 AM

@Sadie_NC - Sadie

Your taxpayer dollars at work. 🙄🙄 https://t.co/Wgu7uG7DEM

Saved - October 19, 2025 at 6:30 PM

@RogerMarshallMD - Dr. Roger Marshall

$40B/year bonus for Obamacare subsidies—mostly to well-off at 4x poverty. Dems are threatening a gov’t shutdown to borrow $400B+ over 10 yrs from our grandkids, subsidizing successful insurance companies. Borrowing from future generations for corporate welfare? No way. https://t.co/uaOBRD5fRw

Saved - April 10, 2026 at 1:12 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I recorded undercover videos showing PPFA leaders using partial-birth abortions to harvest and sell baby parts. Big Abortion tried to silence me, even enlisting Kamala Harris to raid my home. Thanks to President Trump, NIH will no longer fund aborted-tissue research; nearly $1B in federal funding was defunded and HHSGov is divesting. I still face a ~$25M civil fine, and harvesting continues in abortion strongholds.

@daviddaleiden - David Daleiden

🧵Lots of new follows over the holiday, so let me reintroduce my work: I recorded the undercover videos that caught @PPFA's top leaders using partial-birth abortions to harvest and sell body parts from preemie-age babies—often to government-funded labs. https://t.co/H8zrJND9uk

@daviddaleiden - David Daleiden

Big Abortion knew this story was devastating to their reputation, and tried to silence me to avoid public scrutiny. They tried to put me in jail in Texas and in California—even enlisting @KamalaHarris to raid my home and seize the videos, like this one: https://t.co/dsfDT0LKz0

@daviddaleiden - David Daleiden

@KamalaHarris 11 years later, despite vicious retaliation from @PPFA @NatAbortionFed, Big Abortion has been defunded of nearly $1 billion in federal taxpayer money. @HHSGov is divesting from fetal experimentation. And I am free and the whole world can watch the tapes. https://t.co/QJ18hNsUGi

@WhiteHouse - The White House

Thanks to President Trump, @NIH will NO LONGER fund research using aborted baby tissue. "Under President Trump’s leadership, taxpayer-funded research must reflect the best science of today and the values of the American people." 🤍🇺🇸 https://t.co/KvjuG20Wsj

@daviddaleiden - David Daleiden

@KamalaHarris @PPFA @NatAbortionFed @HHSGov But it's been a long road to get here. My @CtrMedProgress colleagues and I still face a nearly $25 million fine from a Planned Parenthood-member judge in their civil lawsuits. And @PPFA is fighting to re-fund their abortion business through whatever federal avenues they can.

@daviddaleiden - David Daleiden

@KamalaHarris @PPFA @NatAbortionFed @HHSGov @CtrMedProgress Moreover, harvesting preemie-age babies from the most vulnerable communities continues in abortion strongholds across America. The struggling families ripped apart by Big Abortion's fraud and coercion still wait for justice from our country's leaders. https://t.co/H6WEfmTY3K

@daviddaleiden - David Daleiden

@KamalaHarris @PPFA @NatAbortionFed @HHSGov @CtrMedProgress It's imperative that going forward, the federal government does not restore billions of dollars in taxpayer funding to the Big Abortion businesses that prey on our most vulnerable communities: https://t.co/FMFaEzy58T

@TheElizMitchell - Elizabeth Troutman Mitchell

Speaker Johnson plans to let the one-year ban on Medicaid for Planned Parenthood expire, Washington Examiner reports.

@DISivak - David Sivak

Scoop: Mike Johnson plans to leave language defunding Planned Parenthood out of the upcoming reconciliation bill, the latest sign GOP leadership is resisting attempts to expand the scope beyond funding for ICE/CBP. It’s still possible the provision, which expires on July 4, will

View Full Interactive Feed