reSee.it - Related Post Feed

Saved - August 17, 2023 at 12:59 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Title: The Complexities of Sanctions: Impact on Global Energy Markets and Divisions in the EU Introduction: The global landscape is witnessing the far-reaching consequences of sanctions imposed on Russia. While these measures were intended to curb Russia's actions, they have inadvertently caused suffering worldwide. This post delves into the multifaceted effects of sanctions, including skyrocketing energy prices, potential power outages in the UK, and the unexpected strengthening of Russia's economy and unity. Sanctions Backfire, Strengthening Russia's Economy: Despite the sanctions, Russia continues to profit from its energy exports, which has bolstered its economy and fostered a sense of unity among its citizens. The European Union (EU) plans a partial oil embargo, targeting two-thirds of Russian imports. However, this move has inadvertently led to India becoming the largest buyer of Russian oil, subsequently reselling it to Europe. Consequently, the sanctions have backfired, resulting in a stronger Russian economy while the EU grapples with negative growth, inflation, and unemployment. Energy Crisis and Divisions in the EU: The repercussions of the sanctions extend beyond Russia and the EU. Japan, too, faces potential energy shortages, which could affect 1.1 million households. Moreover, the sanctions have exacerbated divisions within the EU, making unity difficult to maintain. As a result, the EU finds itself grappling with the challenges posed by the energy crisis, while Russia thrives economically, earning billions and increasing its financial cushion. Marine Le Pen's Opposition to the Embargo: Marine Le Pen, a prominent political figure, rejects the EU's embargo on Russian oil and gas, highlighting the negative impact it would have on the West. Le Pen argues that such a ban would harm French citizens, further complicating the already intricate situation. It is crucial to consider the potential consequences of the embargo on the well-being of the people it aims to protect. Complexities of the Grain Crisis: The blame for the grain crisis has been primarily placed on Russia. However, it is important to note that Ukraine has admitted to preventing exports, adding complexity to the situation. The grain crisis serves as a reminder that assigning blame without a comprehensive understanding of the circumstances can lead to misplaced accusations. Provocations and Consequences: Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov's provocative questions about stolen goods in Ukraine have further escalated tensions. In response, Kyiv has blocked ship passage and mined ports, exacerbating the already strained relationship between the two nations. Additionally, Ukrainian soldiers burning 50,000 tons of grain adds to the economic losses experienced by Western companies due to Russian sanctions. Impact on Global Energy Markets: The impact of Russia's actions extends beyond regional boundaries. Gazprom, a major Russian gas company, has reduced gas deliveries to Germany, affecting energy supplies in the country. Belgian breweries have also felt the repercussions of the sanctions, highlighting the global reach of this issue. Furthermore, Philip Morris, a multinational tobacco company, has chosen to maintain its presence in Russia despite the sanctions, underscoring the complexities faced by international businesses. Preparing for Gas Emergencies and Propaganda: Germany, recognizing the potential gas crisis, is taking proactive measures to prepare for emergencies. The country's gas minister has called for the development of a comprehensive gas crisis plan to mitigate the impact of potential shortages. Meanwhile, the US remains confident in the effectiveness of the sanctions, emphasizing their impact on Russia. However, there are concerns that gas shortage propaganda may normalize the lack of resources, perpetuating a new normal for affected regions. Conclusion: The complexities surrounding the sanctions against Russia are far-reaching and multifaceted. While intended to curb Russia's actions, they have inadvertently caused suffering worldwide. The energy crisis, divisions within the EU, and the unexpected strengthening of Russia's economy highlight the need for a comprehensive understanding of the situation. It is crucial to consider the potential consequences of sanctions and to approach the issue with a nuanced perspective, avoiding misplaced blame and striving for effective solutions.

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

New thread ‼️ Sanctions against Russia.

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

"The EU should forget about sanctions — they do more harm than good." Suddenly, the British edition of the Guardian began to guess something. "Instead of forcing Russia to leave Ukraine, EU sanctions are causing enormous suffering around the world, as food and ... 1/3

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

... energy prices are skyrocketing," writes columnist Simon Jenkins. So, this winter, 6 million households in Britain will face the possibility of power outages in the morning and evening to maintain sanctions against Russia. The same threatens consumers across Europe ... 2/3

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

At the same time, Russia continues to receive billions of dollars for its energy resources. Sanctions in general rarely force anyone to change their policy, and in the case of Russia it has defiantly failed, sums up Jenkins. 3/3

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

🇪🇺EU countries have agreed on a partial ban on oil imports from Russia, European Council President Michel announced According to European Council President Charles Michel, the partial embargo will affect two-thirds of all Russian imports. 1/3

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

💬"An agreement has been reached on an embargo on Russian oil imports into the EU. This directly affects two-thirds of oil imports from Russia," Michel wrote on Twitter. According to EU Commission chief Ursula von der Leyen, the EU's oil consumption from Russia is to be 2/3

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

reduced by 90% by the end of the year. Michel also confirmed that in addition to the oil embargo, the sixth package of sanctions will include other pressure measures: Sberbank will be cut off from SWIFT and 3 Russian TV channels will be banned from broadcasting in the EU. 3/3

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

‼️🇹🇷🇷🇺We will not join the sanctions against Russia and will not allow it to be done through us — Turkish Foreign Ministry

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

🇪🇺 EU WAIVES 🇮🇳 INDIA BUYS 🇨🇳 CHINA WAITS 🇷🇺 RUSSIA PROFIT 💸 Western mainstream media would label the following numbers as fake news and Russian propaganda. But the figures come from the Indian daily newspaper "Business Standard" and show rising oil imports from Russia to... 1/3

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

India,which the EU would not necessarily like.THESE ARE FACTS The world's most populous country after China imported 24 million barrels of Russian oil this month. Last month, the import volume was 7.2 million barrels. As a result, Indian oil imports grew by more than 300%. 2/3

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

Oil expert Felix Todd : the increasing imports from India as critical and warns of a still reluctant China, which is currently holding back "due to the fall in demand". "But if Beijing increases its imports from Russia, China alone could offset an oil embargo from all of EU. 3/3

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

⚡BREAKING NEWS⚡ Shell Energy Europe notifies Gazprom Export that it will not pay in Rubles for gas supplies to Germany.

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

🇷🇺🇮🇳While the EU imposes an embargo, India becomes the largest buyer of Russian oil. It processes this oil and resells it to Europe. 😁 Indian refineries Reliance and Nayara are increasing purchases of "black gold" at a discount, writes Reuters. 1/3

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

"India has bought about 62.5 million barrels of Russian oil since February 24 — three times more than in the same period of 2021," the newspaper reports. Half of all oil is received by the largest private refineries, which then send it for sale, including to the EU (!). 2/3

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

At the same time, thanks to the 15% increase in exports of petroleum products, companies are making record profits. Soon, Russian oil will travel around the world before entering the EU. And the Europeans will pay for this "tour". 🤦 3/3

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

Bloomberg writes that this year Moscow will receive 20% more revenue from energy exports. Taking into account the export of metals, this amount will exceed $300 billion,which is equal to funds frozen in foreign accounts.‼️

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

Zoran Milanovic has criticized the European Union's recent plans for new Russia sanctions. These new sanctions plans would only make Vladimir Putin smile. There are so many potential buyers of Russian oil and gas. The demand is huge. 1/3

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

Milanovic explains: 💬“Unfortunately, the sanctions are not working. (...) Russia does not feel this from a financial point of view. And should it feel this, the war will already be over. The price will be paid by the citizens of Europe, while Vladimir Putin will grin in .. 2/3

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

satisfaction.” The Croatian head of state now sees Hungary in particular, but also Slovakia and the Czech Republic as important decision-makers in the future energy supply of the EU from Russia. 3/3

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

🇷🇺🇺🇸Russia will not sell energy resources at a loss. Pricing regulates the market, despite the man-made difficulties created by the West, Peskov said. His response to Biden's words, who suggested that the EU, instead of an embargo on Russian oil, buy it "at a limited price."

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

"Unprecedented income" from energy exports: rising oil and natural gas prices in 2022 will bring Russia $ 285 billion,-Bloomberg This will create a "solid financial safety cushion"against sanctions,Bloomberg emphasizes.

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

🇷🇺🇬🇧Russia is winning the economic war unleashed by the West. After three months of sanctions, things are going very badly, writes a columnist for the British newspaper The Guardian. 1/4

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

"The sanctions have had the opposite effect — an increase in the cost of oil and gas from Russia and a significant increase in its trade balance." Russia easily finds alternative markets, increases oil supplies to China by 50% and strengthens the ruble. 2/4

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

While Europe is gradually abandoning Russian energy resources, Moscow has time to find alternative sources of component supplies. "Sanctions were imposed not because they were the best option, but because they were better than inaction or military intervention," 3/4

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

concludes The Guardian columnist. As a result, Western economies faced a period of negative growth, accelerating inflation and unemployment. 4/4

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

The Guardian's new business editor, Larry Elliot (known for his connections to the Royal Family), writes the following theses in his new Opinion article: 🚨 The impact of sanctions is causing fuel and food costs to rise in the rest of the world - fears of a humanitarian ... 1/3

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

... catastrophe are growing 🚨 An agreement with Putin must be reached sooner rather than later 🚨 The West has started its economic war against Russia and it is not going according to plan. On the contrary, things are going really badly. 2/3

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

🚨 EU should forget the sanctions - they do more harm than good 🚨 The compromise with the Kremlin is currently difficult to swallow, but economic reality only allows one conclusion: sooner or later there will be an agreement Source : https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2022/jun/02/russia-economic-war-ukraine-food-fuel-price-vladimir-putin 3/3

Russia is winning the economic war - and Putin is no closer to withdrawing troops | Larry Elliott The perverse effects of sanctions means rising fuel and food costs for the rest of the world – and fears are growing of a humanitarian catastrophe, says Larry Elliott, the Guardian’s economics editor theguardian.com

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

🇩🇪🇪🇺Europe may lose "air for industry". This was stated by the head of the German Chemical Industry Association Christian Kullman. "The industry is deprived of the air necessary for breathing, or rather, the gas necessary for its operation," he said. 1/2

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

Since the abandonment of nuclear and coal power, gas has been the basis of Germany's energy supply. If Berlin abandons the "blue fuel", then German industry will be under threat. Kullman stresses that calls for an embargo on Russian gas are unreasonable and outrageous. 2/2

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

Sanctions against the former German subsidiary of Gazprom will cost the residents of Germany € 5 billion According to the newspaper Welt am Sonntag, Gazprom Germania is now forced to buy gas on the market under new contracts, which are significantly more expensive ... 1/2

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

than the previous ones, and the difference in price falls on the end consumers of gas. On March 31, the Gazprom Group ceased participation in Gazprom Germania GmbH and all its assets, and on May 11, the German company was included in the Russian sanctions list. 2/2

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

🇪🇺🇷🇺Russia has hit the most painful place in Europe — energy, writes Bloomberg. Europe's steps have led to a split within the EU, and many countries are "tired of sanctions," the author of the article claims. Moreover, according to Bloomberg Economics, ... 1/2

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

... Russia's oil and gas revenues will amount to about $285 billion this year, which will compensate for the freezing of Russian foreign exchange reserves. The paradox: The sanctions are imposed by the European Union, and Russia is to blame and "beats". 2/2

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

Nikkei: Japan may face energy shortages for 1,100,000 households ▪️ The largest energy crisis after the earthquake and tsunami of 2011 may occur in Japan. According to Nikkei calculations, in a cold winter, the country may not have enough energy in an amount equivalent to ...1/4

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

... the needs of 1,100,000 households The reasons for the energy crisis are uncertainty about the purchase of energy resources from Russia against the background of Western anti-Russian sanctions in which Japan participates, as well as the shutdown of thermal power plants ... 2/4

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

... and the slow process of restarting nuclear power plants. ▪️ 3.5 million kW — a general shortage of electricity can reach. With the restriction of LNG exports from Russia, this figure will increase to 7.5 million kW The price of one kiloliter of crude oil in Japan ... 3/4

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

... rose by $18 on Monday, reaching the highest since July 2008. The market is dominated by pessimistic forecasts regarding the continuation of the period of instability and the increase in prices for raw materials, which exacerbates the upcoming energy crisis 4/4

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

🇷🇺 🇨🇳 Soon you will lift your sanctions to harm Russia - Chinese Ambassador to the United States The United States recently threatened China with sanctions, after which Qin Gang recalled what the restrictions they imposed against Russia led to: "All your sanctions have had ...1/4

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

... the opposite effect. The Russian economy has only become stronger and more productive. The Russian national currency has become the most efficient in the world. As a result, only your economy has lost." 2/3

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

"And in order to harm Russia, you will be forced to lift your sanctions, but it will be too late," the Ambassador said. 3/3

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

🇷🇺The Russian "financial cushion" continues to grow against the background of sanctions. Similar information is provided by the German edition Tagesschau. In just a month, Moscow earned more than $ 40 billion, the German edition writes. 1/2

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

The main income came from the sale of energy resources. Now the Russian National Welfare Fund is about $200 billion. This figure is the highest level since the beginning of the operation in Ukraine and is just slightly less than the previous record in November 2021. 2/2

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

🇪🇪 "It is very difficult to maintain the unity of the European Union." It is becoming increasingly difficult for EU countries to reach a consensus on anti-Russian sanctions, the Estonian Prime Minister said. 1/3

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

"At first, sanctions created difficulties only for Russia, but now they are painful for our countries as well. The question is how much pain we are willing to endure," Kallas believes. 2/3

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

According to her, people in the "free world" do not understand that "gas can be expensive, but freedom is priceless." War is peace, ignorance is strength, freedom is sanctions. 3/3

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

"The sanctions tend to bring the Russians together rather than turn people against the Kremlin," explains Ulrich Heyden. https://overton-magazin.de/background/politik/sanktionen-als-chance/

Sanktionen als Chance für Russland Durch die Sanktionen des Westens wird der Lebensstandard der einfachen Russen deutlich sinken. Wird Russland sich jetzt an China orientieren? overton-magazin.de

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

🇷🇺 Gulf States without sanctions The Arab Gulf states say they support Russia and will not impose sanctions on Russia after an official visit by Russian Foreign Ministry spokesman Lavrov.

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

Western sanctions against Russia 😊

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

Ukraine itself prevents the export of grain and imposes conditions While Western media blames Russia for not being able to bring grain by sea from Ukraine, Ukraine now openly says it is preventing it. And it sets conditions for the export of grain. https://www.anti-spiegel.ru/2022/ukraine-verhindert-selbst-die-ausfuhr-von-getreide-und-stellt-bedingungen/

Ukraine verhindert selbst die Ausfuhr von Getreide und stellt Bedingungen – Anti-SpiegelFixed Width Sidebar anti-spiegel.ru

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

🇫🇷🇷🇺 MARINE LE PEN REJECTS EMBARGO AGAINST RUSSIA Marine Le Pen says what many dare not say. The West is weakening itself with the sanctions packages against Russia. The former French presidential candidate even spoke of the positive effects of the sanctions on the ... 1/3

Video Transcript AI Summary
This is a stupid and harmful sanction for the people. The Russians and Europeans will benefit from it, as the Russian oil we won't buy will be sold to others, increasing its price. This means Russia will become richer, and the European Union will be pleased. But the moral question is whether it should be the Europeans funding the war. It's a stupidity that doesn't consider the difficult situation of the French and other Europeans, especially the French. I focus on the daily lives of the French, which are very difficult.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: C'est une c'est une sanction stupide et nocive pour le peuple. Vous savez combien ça ça rapporte que cette fois l'emportante. Par les européens, parmi les russes Vous imaginez bien que le pétrole russe que nous n'achèterons pas sera vendu à d'autres et que le fait qu'il y ait précisément une rupture dans cet approvisionnement va faire augmenter le prix du pétrole vendu. Ça veut dire que la Russie sera d'autant plus riche l'Union européenne. Donc en réalité la Russie sera ravie. Mais la question morale derrière Marine Le Pen, que ce ne soit pas les européens qui financent la guerre Alors C'est une stupidité et c'est une stupidité qui ne tient pas compte encore une fois de la situation très difficile des Français, moi pardon, des d'ailleurs des Européens dans leur camp des Français en particulier. Moi, je m'attache à la vie quotidienne des Français, leur vie est très difficile.

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

... Russian economy. The EU embargo on Russian oil makes no sense because Russia will only enrich itself by selling oil to other countries once it is imposed. The ban on Russian oil and a possible embargo on Russian gas would have serious consequences for French citizens: 2/3

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

💬 "This is stupidity that does not take into account the very difficult situation of the French and the entire European Union. I myself take care of the daily life of the French. Your life is very difficult.” 3/3

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

🇷🇺🌾LAWROW ON GRAIN CRISIS: "YOU ARE ALWAYS WORRIED ABOUT WHERE TO STEAL SOMETHING, RIGHT?" And the marmot says hello every day. Russia and Putin are to blame for all the evil in the world. This time, the Kremlin is accused of deliberately denying Ukraine the ability to ... 1/4

Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, the speaker discusses the sale of Ukrainian products, specifically grain, to Russia. They mention that their goal is to relieve pressure on the eastern part of Ukraine from the neo-regime. They explain that there are no obstacles for transporting grain to Russia, as long as President Zelensky gives the command to allow foreign ships to enter the Black Sea.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Что из ук в украине помимо зерна россии уже удалось продать еще раз что из в украине помимо зерна россии уже удалось о том вас голова балет о том где чего св до что все так поступают я вам отвечаю мы занимаемся реал реализации цели которые были об объявлен публично из избавить восток украины от давления нео режима. Вот мы занимаемся о зерно мы сегодня объяснили что зерно может свободно транспорт в пункта назначен россии никаких препятствий для этого нужно чтобы господин зеленский дал команду если он еще чем там команду чтобы разрешили иностранным даю суда выйти в черную море

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

... export grain through traditional sea routes. There is speculation that Moscow is deliberately exacerbating wheat shortages on the world market in order to starve some parts of the world. In Ankara, a Ukrainian journalist tries to lure Russian Foreign Minister Sergei ... 2/4

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

... Lavrov out of his reserve with provocative questions: 💬"What of the goods stolen in Ukraine, apart from grain, has Russia already sold?" Lavrov's reaction: 💬"Oh, you're always worried about where to steal something, right? You think everyone does that?" 3/4

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

❗️The bitter reality: Kyiv blocks the passage of Ukrainian and foreign ships, and almost all ports are mined. 4/4

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

🔥50,000 TONS - UKRAINIAN SOLDIERS BURN GRAIN According to the Russian Defense Ministry, Ukrainian fighters burned around 50,000 tons of grain while retreating. A Russian correspondent reports: 💬"The grain is still partly hot, smoke can still be seen in some places." 1/2

Video Transcript AI Summary
I am in Mariupol, specifically in a grain storage facility. Behind me are tons and tons of corn. The Ukrainian Ministry of Defense has confirmed that around 50 tons of grain, including corn and wheat, will be sent to Ukraine. This grain is not suitable for consumption by humans or animals. Ukrainian forces are distributing it along their route, ensuring it doesn't fall into the wrong hands.
Full Transcript
Я нахожусь в городе мари а именно мал порту место где хранится зерно вот мне сейчас одном из этих мест вот за мной тонны тонны кукуруза кукурузы наше министерство обороны уже сказали что на украинские при раз около 50 тонн зерна это и кукуруза и пшеница нового вот вам подтверждение возьму в руки вот так это выглядит зерно до сих пор горячая некоторых местах даже дым больше 50 тысяч тонн и конечно же сейчас это зерно не для использования использования печени не для людей не для животных вот так поступают украинские на от все с на своем пути как говорится не тебе не людям

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

For some Western countries, 50,000 tons of grain might be peanuts. For the countries in Africa they are vital. 50,000 tons of grain fill an entire container ship, which could then have set off for the Horn of Africa. 2/2

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

🇺🇸✈️ 737 MAX? Nyet! Boeing ends production of the 737 MAX airliner The reason is the "anti-Russian" sanctions:every third Boeing is assembled from Russian titanium. The company's manufacturing process for the plane imperatively requires the use of a cutting machine made in Russia

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

International companies have lost more than $59 billion from sanctions they imposed on Russia. The amount will increase due to write-downs of Russian assets and expenses of companies exiting the Russian market. 1/2

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

After e.g. For example, when McDonald's sold its business in Russia, the company lost $1.2-1.4 billion. And Exxon Mobil, which exited an oil and gas project in Russia's Far East, lost $3.4 billion. That's why many already want to come back to the Russian market. 2/2

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

🇷🇺📈 Ruble rate hurts West The appreciation of the ruble is leading to financial losses for the West, writes National Interest Further strengthening of the ruble will mean additional costs for the West when buying Russian energy resources, according to National Interest. 1/3

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

"The burden imposed on the West to pay for the gas in rubles will become increasingly painful for the West. If the ruble continues to appreciate in the coming months, western countries will have to bear the additional cost of converting their currencies into rubles to pay ... 2/3

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

... for imports of non-renewable energy resources." Such a development would increase demand for Russian currency in the world and also show the ineffectiveness of Western sanctions against Russia, the publication's journalists conclude. 3/3

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

🇺🇸😭 "HEY PUTIN! WE'LL SEND YOU THE BILL!": AMERICANS TURN THE WHEEL BECAUSE OF GASOLINE PRICES 🚗💰High gas prices are driving many Americans to despair! Of course, some of them believe their government's propaganda, which tries to hide their own political mistakes ... 1/3

Video Transcript AI Summary
Gas prices have skyrocketed to $7.55 per gallon, prompting frustration from the speaker. They jokingly address Putin, suggesting that he should be sent a bill for the high costs. The speaker also mentions that they only managed to put $15 worth of gas in their car.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Look at the price of gas now. It's 7.55 a gallon. Hey, Putin. We're sending you a bill. I put $15 in my car for gas.

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

... and blame others. You have three guesses on who... ❗️ Russia's President Vladimir Putin had previously explained where the rising prices for gasoline are actually coming from: 💬 "Alternative energy opportunities are being exaggerated. The importance of traditional ...2/3

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

energies like hydrocarbon has been downplayed instead. All of this has led to a lack of investment in the world's energy market." ‼️ If you don't want to hear, you have to feel. 3/3

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

Politician Juan Guaido (Ex Pres. of the National Assembly of Venezuela) was beaten by an angry crowd in a Venezuelan restaurant. While trying to escape, his car was fired upon, but Guaido was not injured. He can thank USA for such treatment for sanctioning Venezuela to oblivion.

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

"No one wants to come here to pick it up" - Farmer reports massive stocks of grain A farmer in the Donbass region reported that tons of wheat were piling up in the granaries because of the transport routes were interrupted and it was difficult for the grain to find a buyer. 1/3

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the challenges they face with storing grain products due to the ongoing war. They mention that no one wants to take the products, and they are left with the options of either throwing them away or selling them at a low price. They also mention the quantity of grain they need to sell and the price they have to sell it for. The speaker expresses their respect for the audience.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Я за нужно ху на складе зерно продукции можем вы уже 4 месяц то что началась война, полностью закрылась. Никто не хочет лю за у нас эти на территории нашего села он до бу. По членов сам проблема, потому что тоже звонят ты куда ждать. Тут и варианты сдать просто на см выкинуть, будучи. Что за цена, если дают дерево выращивать результат от его со подо в сели тоже получим и вот тона скал 70 тысяч тонн 30 уже 100 и за 3000 надо сдать. Я тогда я так уважаю за господа полностью.

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

And the although there are large stocks and the world market on the grain is dependent. While world wheat prices shot up in February, prices in villages like Ptichye are so low because of the lack of buyers that grain cultivation is no longer profitable. According to the ...2/3

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

... farmer Sergei Chrebzow, there is an option to sell the grain yourself for a ridiculous price. But the cost of transport is far too high, so it would be cheaper to just throw the grain away. 3/3 More on this: https://test.rtde.tech/international/140633-uno-warnt-vor-globaler-katastrophe/

UNO warnt vor globaler "Katastrophe" im Lebensmittelbereich Mit immer dramatischeren Appellen gehen Vertreter internationaler Organisationen an die Öffentlichkeit, um über die katastrophalen Konsequenzen eines längeren Konfliktes am Schwarzen Meer auf die weltweite Lebensmittelversorgung zu warnen. test.rtde.tech

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

Counter? Russia's News 🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺 🇷🇺🇺🇸 If Russia refuses to supply the United States with enriched uranium, Washington faces negative consequences for the operation of the reactors, up to and including their shutdown. Matt Bowen and Paul Dabbar, researchers at Columbia ...1/3

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

...University's Center for Global Energy Policy, warn of this in an article for The Hill. As mentioned in the article, many reactors operating in the United States and the European Union are manufactured in Russia, and Moscow supplies components for them. According to ...2/3

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

...the authors of the material, if tensions between Russia and the West do not ease, many nuclear power plants are threatened with closure. Such a scenario could lead to capacity constraints in consumer demand. 3/3

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

‼️Russia's Gazprom reduces gas deliveries to Germany via Nord Stream 1 by 40% due to "delayed repairs."‼️

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

🇧🇪🍻🇷🇺 Sanctions with effect In Belgium, some breweries are going bankrupt because they run out of glass bottles, 87% of which used to come from Russia. It simply takes too much energy to produce this glassware in Europe. The bottles won't be coming back anytime soon. 1/2

Video Transcript AI Summary
In Belgium, beer is not consumed as much, but those who do prefer to pour the right drink into the appropriate glass. However, there is a shortage of bottles. Previously, empty glass bottles were imported from Russia. Now, a company called Heineken fills its beer into the remaining universal bottles of 0.33 liters. Other beer producers also use bottles of the same capacity, but they are also running out. This is a big problem for us as we export 87% of our beer. These bottles will not be returned. The production of glassware has become expensive due to the rising energy costs. Many breweries have tried to switch to metal cans, but aluminum production is even more energy-intensive. Small breweries and establishments will be affected more than others.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: В Бельгии не так много употребляют бо пива, но такие предпочитают наливать правильный ох напиток в соответствующий сорт бокал из бутылок. А их стало не хватать. Пустая стекло раньше поступал выступала из России. Компания Хе раз свое пиво в оставшиеся универсальные Бутылка 03 33 литра типа а говорит владелец л Другие пиво товары работают с бутылкой типа шт такой же емкости, но они тоже ко. Для нас это большая проблема, потому что мы экспорт 87 процентов. Эти бутылки не вернутся. На данный момент это пиво ва со штат там 110 человек производит производят 250 тысяч г пива в год, передает компонент Е П. Но если опасения, что продажи упадут на 20 процентов если кризис всё лето Производство стеклянные посуды самой Б стало очень дорогим из-за за роста стоимости энергии, Многие пи заводы пытались переходить на металлические банки, но нато на глобальную не алюминия, производства которого еще более энерго затрат. От сочетания этих не неприятных факторов прежде всего страдают малые заводы, а также небольшие пи заведения. Это определенно повлияет на некоторых пиво больше чем на других.

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

The breweries therefore wanted to switch to aluminum cans, but that requires even more energy, and the aluminum also came from Russia. 💬 As you can see: The sanctions are not ineffective at all 😉 2/2

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

Meanwhile, Iraq remains the country's most important fuel supplier. According to a Reuters report, Russia became India's second largest supplier of crude oil in May. India has not joined Western sanctions against Moscow. https://test.rtde.tech/international/140974-reuters-russia-becomes-indias-second-largest/

Reuters: Russland wird Indiens zweitgrößter Öl-Lieferant Laut einem Bericht von Reuters wurde Russland im Mai zum zweitgrößten Rohöl-Lieferanten Indiens. Noch im März war Russland auf Rang zehn. Der Irak bleibt derweil der wichtigste Kraftstoff-Lieferant des Landes. Indien hat sich den westlichen Sanktionen gegen Moskau nicht angeschlossen. de.rt.com

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

Exchange prices for gas in Europe sharply accelerated growth to 10% after Gazprom announced a reduction in supplies via the Nord Stream. A thousand cubic meters now cost over $1,150.

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

🇺🇸 The US shot itself in the foot with the sanctions An American expert commented on the consequences of anti-Russian sanctions. President of the American Institute of Economic Research William Ruger in an interview with Fox News.

Video Transcript AI Summary
William Ruger, president of the American Institute For Economic Research, discusses the ineffectiveness of sanctions in changing the behavior of target states. He explains that while sanctions may punish the people of the state, they rarely cause state leaders to give up what they consider vital to their national interest. Ruger suggests that sanctions often serve as a feel-good response when other interventions are deemed too costly. He also mentions the unintended consequences of sanctions, such as increased oil and food prices, which then require subsidies for global food assistance. Ruger criticizes the predictability of these outcomes and questions the effectiveness of the current administration's policies.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Here now is William Ruger, president of the American Institute For Economic Research. Doctor. Ruger, was this inevitable from day 1? Speaker 1: Yeah. I mean, sanctions rarely work to change the behavior of target states, you know. Sure, you can punish the people of the state, right? They can suffer, But you're not gonna actually cause state leaders to give up what they consider to be so important to their vital national interest. In the case of Russia, That's the situation in Ukraine. So often what you get is a kind of feel good response, right? This is feel good activity When other types of interventions are just deemed to be too costly like direct military intervention. So, you know, again, it was 4 0 day in many ways. And oftentimes when they are successful, they just take a lot of time and it isn't necessarily on something so vital like Ukraine. Speaker 0: Well, the fact of the matter is the revenue from Russia's fossil fuel exports have Exceeded what the country is spending on the war in Ukraine according to a report in The New York Times. So They're making a huge amount of money. And China, as I said back in March, once we knew they were gonna be buying, oil from Russia? That was kind of game over. I mean, this was all kind of ridiculous. It's like Kabuki theater in a way. Speaker 1: Yeah. Again, this is just yet another case of the kind of unintended consequences we see from misguided actions. I mean, you know, we heard about these yachts, right, that we had seized and then we have to pay for their upkeep. That's a kind of small example, but we see this in terms of oil prices, Food prices. And then you see the United States saying, look, we need to provide subsidies for global food assistance. And and again, it's like, you know, a case in which these were very predictable. Scholars have been studying this for decades and finding that sanctions Are oftentimes not very helpful. So again, very predictable and, you know, really that's kind of typical of what we've seen from this administration. Are policies that sound like they're gonna be helpful to the American taxpayer or people abroad, but they actually shoot ourselves in the foot?

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

Some EU countries have already stated they want to start to use coal plants again to make up for the list of Russian gas. If we look at EU coal import of 2020 we see that most coal was imported from .... Russia 🤦 https://www.statista.com/statistics/1034930/eu-hard-coal-imports-by-origin/

EU hard coal import volume by origin 2021 | Statista In 2021, European Union (EU) countries imported the largest volume of hard coal from Russia, at nearly 49.5 million metric tons. statista.com

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

Philip Morris does not want to leave Russia, The Wall Street Journal reports. It is not so easy to sell assets. The tobacco company started leaving the Russian Federation in March, but faced various restrictions. 1/2

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

In addition, the Russian market is important for Philip Morris. Even under Brezhnev, they started making Marlboro cigarettes under license, and now the company has a factory in St. Petersburg and sales offices in about a hundred cities. By end 2021, they sold 10% in Russia. 2/2

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

🆘🇩🇪 Preparations for an emergency The German authorities are preparing to declare a state of emergency because of the gas supply situation - Die Welt

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

🇪🇺⚡Europe must immediately prepare for a complete shutdown of Russian gas exports this winter, and governments must take action to keep aging nuclear power plants running, Fatih Birol, head of the International Energy Agency, told the Financial Times. 1/3

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

Russia's decision to cut gas supplies to European countries last week could herald further cuts as Moscow hopes to gain "leverage" in a war with Ukraine, he warned. 2/4

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

"Europe must be prepared for Russian gas to be completely shut off. I believe the cuts are intended to keep storage in Europe from filling up and increase Russia's influence during the winter months," he said. 3/3

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

🆘 Breaking news - gas alert! 🇩🇪 🆘❗️ The federal government is preparing the alarm level of the gas emergency plan - with expensive consequences for energy customers 1/4

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

The utilities should "assume" that the alert level will be declared within 5 to 10 days, four people familiar with the process said independently, according to the newspaper. The ministry neither confirmed nor denied the process when asked. According to the report, ...2/4

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

...companies in the energy industry have been preparing for an imminent declaration of the alert level since then. 🇪🇺❗️ In addition, Europe will completely stop gas imports from Russia - according to a report from the International Energy Agency. 3/4

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

-> Source https://www.t-online.de/finanzen/unternehmen-verbraucher/id_92334264/nach-bericht-bundesregierung-bereitet-alarmstufe-des-notfallplans-gas-vor.html 4/4

Nach Bericht: Bundesregierung bereitet Alarmstufe des Notfallplans Gas vor Die Bundesregierung könnte in den nächsten Tagen die zweite Stufe des Notfallplans Gas, die sogenannte Alarmstufe, ausrufen. Das geht aus einem Medienbericht hervor.  t-online.de

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

‼️🇷🇺🤝🇮🇳🛢💰The import of Russian oil by India from May 27 to June 15 increased 31 times compared to the same period last year. https://t.co/KUzRF1nVE4

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

🇩🇪💥 BREAKING In the course of the declared gas shortage, German Economics Minister Robert Habeck (Greens) calls for the second stage of the crisis in the gas emergency plan. https://t.co/cUTRxU3UpP

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

Imports of Russian oil to India jumped 50 (!) times, writes The Economic Times. Before the start of the Russian special operation in Ukraine, Russian oil accounted for only 0.2% of the oil imported by India, the newspaper writes. 1/2 https://t.co/ZFWgQrbONA

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

Now the share of Russian oil in India is 10%. Russia has overtaken Saudi Arabia in terms of supplies to India and has become the second largest supplier, second only to Iraq so far, the newspaper notes. 2/2

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

🇩🇪 Vice-Chancellor Habek is absolutely serious about suggesting that Germans buy another showerhead so that they can save 30% on heating water, and wash themselves less often and faster. 1/2 https://t.co/XBifkEPooB

Video Transcript AI Summary
I wouldn't want to live in a country where people only do things for money. The energy minister opposes changing light bulbs to save 30% energy. We fight for Putin's sake, but these efforts do make a difference. It's not a joke when someone says they'll only help for a 50 euro bonus. I can tell you one thing, old man, you won't get it.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Мне не хотелось бы жить в стране которые люди что-то делают только ради денег нужно перестать у п звучит банально министр энергетики против поменять л для з, чтобы сэкономить 30 процентов энергии. Ха боремся путина л для душа но в сумме эти дают результат все это не шутки тому кто говорит, что будет помогать только за бонус 50 евро я могу сказать одно ты их не получишь старик

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

Just think for a while, this is not some small official, this is the second face of the country, the Vice Chancellor and Minister of Economy all in one. Can you imagine something like this from Mishustin? 2/2

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

🇺🇸 Washington is confident that the effect of the sanctions imposed against Russia will increase over time, US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken said. Meanwhile, residents of the US began to hang RING doorbells on their cars in order to prevent the theft of expensive gasoline. https://t.co/dpSTPtVS9J

@TaranQ - Jos Quinten

The propaganda is in full swing, the shortage is sold to us as good and healthy. Gas shortage in winter - Expert: "Actually, it would be healthy if we shivered from the cold every day" Lack is the new normal. https://t.co/gKc1tVHocl

Saved - June 30, 2023 at 6:18 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The presence of the USS Kearsarge in the Baltic Sea with transponders off raised questions. Joe Biden, Luisamneubauer, ABaerbock, and radeksikorski's statements added to the intrigue. Jet fuel's ability to melt steel pipes was questioned. AI art added a touch of surrealism. The CIA's intentions were questioned, along with Russia's pipeline plans. The alleged poisoning of Navalny and the cancellation of Nordstream 2 were discussed. The possibility of CIA force bombing Europe for a Green Agenda was raised. The core questions revolved around perception and the Joepedo meme. The completion of Poland's gas pipeline coincided with the Nordstream 2 incident. Finnish Interior Minister's fainting incident raised suspicions. The Atlantic Council's stance on ending Nord Stream 2 was highlighted. German MSM blamed Russia, while underwater sabotage shots were leaked. ZelenskyyUa's actions and NATO's response were mentioned. ZelenskyyUa's discovery of a billion dollars and a villain in Miami was noted. Energy pills, OPEC's stance, and ZelenskyyUa's desire for a preemptive NATO strike were discussed. Soros' alleged plans and Elon Musk's involvement were mentioned.

@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra

Why was the USS Kearsarge there with transponders off some weeks ago? https://ndr.de/nachrichten/schleswig-holstein/US-Navy-zeigt-Flagge-in-der-oestlichen-Ostsee,usnavy102.html… https://www-ndr-de.translate.goog/nachrichten/schleswig-holstein/US-Navy-zeigt-Flagge-in-der-oestlichen-Ostsee,usnavy102.html?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en… What did @JoeBiden mean by this? What did @Luisamneubauer mean? What did @ABaerbock hint? What did @radeksikorski mean by this? QRD: https://twitter.com/Bobby_Network/status/1569248548180336640 https://www.ndr.de/nachrichten/schleswig-holstein/US-Navy-zeigt-Flagge-in-der-oestlichen-Ostsee,usnavy102.html https://www-ndr-de.translate.goog/nachrichten/schleswig-holstein/US-Navy-zeigt-Flagge-in-der-oestlichen-Ostsee,usnavy102.html?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en What

US Navy zeigt Flagge in der östlichen Ostsee Der größte Kampfverband der US Navy seit Ende des Kalten Krieges ist unterwegs in die östliche Ostsee. Experten verstehen das als Zeichen der Unterstützung für das Baltikum und Skandinavien - und als Botschaft der Entschlossenheit gegenüber Russland. ndr.de
US Navy zeigt Flagge in der östlichen Ostsee Der größte Kampfverband der US Navy seit Ende des Kalten Krieges ist unterwegs in die östliche Ostsee. Experten verstehen das als Zeichen der Unterstützung für das Baltikum und Skandinavien - und als Botschaft der Entschlossenheit gegenüber Russland. www-ndr-de.translate.goog

@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra

Add.#73: Reading Time: 2019 DoD Doc, @librarycongress: Topics: US pulling out of INF Nuclear treaty Reapproving Leathal Aid supply to 🇺🇦 Drawing 🇷🇺 into a war in 🇺🇦 Applying hard sanctions on 🇷🇺 Oil & Gas Pressuring 🇸🇪 and 🇫🇮 to join @NATO (thx2AnonFren) https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/research_reports/RR3000/RR3063/RAND_RR3063.pdf

PAGE NOT AVAILABLE (Error 404) rand.org

@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra

Can Jetfuel melt steel pipes?

@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra

Some accompanying AI art for the proper surrealism.

@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra

What did the @CIA mean by this?

@TheInsiderPaper - Insider Paper

JUST IN 🚨 The CIA had weeks ago warned Germany about possible attacks on gas pipelines in the Baltic Sea - German magazine Spiegel

@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra

Remember when Russia tried to establish a pipeline through Syria? [Gentle Reminder: Can't Mossad The Assad] More fails from Poland: https://archive.ph/dvQ5m

@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra

Remember when @CIA (most probably) poisoned their own spooks-asset Navalny then pushed the "Putin-did-it"-legend to achieve cancellation of Nordstream 2? https://web.archive.org/web/20220321150846/https://strategic-culture.org/news/2020/12/28/navalny-poisoning-cia-mi6-discredited-state-funded-bellingcat-play-key-role-in-accusing-russia/ https://archive.ph/bWzZC That was a funny time, not? https://archive.ph/wip/I4mXd

Navalny Poisoning: CIA, MI6, ‘Discredited’ State-Funded Bellingcat Play Key role in Accusing Russia Western media coverage has overlooked the key role of the CIA, MI6, and the NATO member state-funded outlet Bellingcat in generating the allegation that Russia’s… web.archive.org

@KimDotcom - Kim Dotcom

Every action the Ukraine takes is coordinated with the US Govt. This recent delivery of underwater drones is interesting. They operate up to a depth of 100 meters. The pipeline explosions were at a depths of 70-90 meters. Go figure. https://www.thedefensepost.com/2022/08/30/uk-mine-hunting-drones-ukraine/

UK Donates Underwater Drones to Ukraine for Mine-Hunting The United Kingdom has announced the delivery of six lightweight underwater drones to Ukraine to hunt Russian mines on its coastlines. thedefensepost.com

@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra

Is @CIA force bombing Europe to a "Green Agenda" to weaken Russia's "Nordstream 2"? (Yes) If 🇩🇪 wanted Total Escalation, they would've sent their Leopards to 🇺🇦, but they didn't. Why? Because 🇩🇪 always negotiates with 🇷🇺(silently). https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2022-09-15/ukraine-must-get-german-leopard-tanks-asap-for-the-next-phase-of-the-war

@aaronjmate - Aaron Maté

In response to Europe's energy crisis, Putin said on Sept. 17 that if Europe wants to solve the issue, it can ignore US orders and open up the Nord Steam 2 pipeline. "Just push the button and everything will get going," Putin said. Instead, someone bombed it.

@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra

The core question: How much "Planet of the Apes" is allowed in your perceptional sphere? This is all such a Crazy Clown Time (© @LynchFoundation, https://youtu.be/6QJpY2VNP0E) , I can't even believe that @CIA & @JoeBiden are pulling this off that blatantly.

@StateDept - Department of State

.@UnderSecStateP Victoria Nuland: “If Russia invades Ukraine, one way or another, Nord Stream 2 will not move forward.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
We are in ongoing discussions with Germany about Nord Stream 2. It is important to note that if Russia invades Ukraine, Nord Stream 2 will not proceed.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: With regard to Nord Stream 2, we continue to have, very strong and clear conversations, with our German allies, and I want to be clear with you today. If Russia invades Ukraine, one way or another, Nord Stream 2 will not move forward.

@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra

The second core question: Are we now finally able to understand the "Joepedo" meme properly? Sub-Question: Can Joepedos melt steel pipelines? Answer: Yes.

@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra

This meme is obligatory, don't you think? We have to extend our questionaire: Can joepedos melt vintage passports in the Baltic Sea? https://archive.ph/JWOq0

@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra

June: Quote:"Baltic Sea - ... assigned to Explosive Ordnance Disposal Mobile Unit ... , prepares mock explosives for a pierside training event during exercise BALTOPS 22, June 10. @USNavy" August: "Controlled Escalation", AIS OFF https://www-ndr-de.translate.goog/nachrichten/schleswig-holstein/US-Navy-zeigt-Flagge-in-der-oestlichen-Ostsee,usnavy102.html?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en https://seapowermagazine.org/baltops-22-a-perfect-opportunity-for-research-and-resting-new-technology/

US Navy zeigt Flagge in der östlichen Ostsee Der größte Kampfverband der US Navy seit Ende des Kalten Krieges ist unterwegs in die östliche Ostsee. Experten verstehen das als Zeichen der Unterstützung für das Baltikum und Skandinavien - und als Botschaft der Entschlossenheit gegenüber Russland. www-ndr-de.translate.goog
BALTOPS 22: A Perfect Opportunity for Research and Resting New Technology  - Seapower BALTIC SEA — A significant focus of BALTOPS every year is the demonstration of NATO mine hunting capabilities, and this year the U.S. Navy continues to use the exercise as an opportunity to test emerging technology, U.S. Naval Forces Europe-Africa... seapowermagazine.org

@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra

Time for a relaxing Nordstream 2 Shot. Question: Can meth melt steel pipes? [meme by anon frens]

@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra

Crazy Clown Time: "New Polish gas pipeline from Norway to reach full capacity ahead of schedule" In other words: Poland's new pipeline - competitor to Russian gas - literally being completed the very same week when NS2 was blown up https://notesfrompoland.com/2022/09/26/new-polish-gas-pipeline-from-norway-to-reach-full-capacity-ahead-of-schedule/ https://archive.ph/wip/XR2Sf

New Polish gas pipeline from Norway to reach full capacity ahead of schedule The Baltic Pipe, due to open this week, will be able to transport up to twice as much gas as planned from Norway to Poland this year. notesfrompoland.com

@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra

Meanwhile: "🇫🇮Finnish Interior Minister goes faint at a government briefing on the explosions on the NordStream" Let's leave that uncommented meanwhile (oh god, was it nerve gas by the Russians?????ßßß? The Navalny Effect?????ßßß????ßPUtinHitler).

@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra

Blasts from the past by @AtlanticCouncil. Quote: "Stay the course on ending Nord Stream 2" So it was a strategic goal all along, since at least March 2021. https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/in-depth-research-reports/issue-brief/biden-and-ukraine-a-strategy-for-the-new-administration/ https://archive.ph/z4YvN

Biden and Ukraine: A strategy for the new administration Joe Biden has an opportunity to fix relations with Ukraine after the turbulence of his predecessor. This is a strategy for his administration. atlanticcouncil.org

@KimDotcom - Kim Dotcom

Why were US Blackhawk helicopters circling over the explosion sites of the Nord Stream pipelines several times in September? They hovered over the incident sites for hours on the night of Sept 22 and 25. https://english.almayadeen.net/news/politics/us-military-aircraft-circled-nord-stream-incident-site-in-se

US military aircraft circled Nord Stream incident site in September The US military reportedly carried out sorties over the future site of the Nord Stream pipeline "incident" in the Baltic Sea. english.almayadeen.net

@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra

Meanwhile: German MSM is on the "Muuuh-Putin-did-it"-train. The answer: Russian Sabotage-War-Dolphins Crazy Clown Time is coming to an interim climax. [only in 🇩🇪, automatic subs here: https://youtu.be/vu3qPYcgs30] You gotta love the C-Class Script-Leftovers.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Satellite images reveal two dolphin pools at the entrance of Sevastopol harbor on the Russian-occupied Crimean Peninsula. However, the depth of the sea in the Baltic Sea makes it challenging for dolphins to be used there. The use of dolphins for terror attacks is complex due to the significant water depth. While a diver could reach a depth of 50 meters, the use of 100 kilograms of TNT explosives makes it unlikely for a single diver to carry out such an attack. It is more plausible that technical means, such as submarines or underwater drones, were used. These drones are commonly used for surveillance and could potentially be used for attacks on pipelines. Access to the pipeline system would be necessary for the use of remotely controlled cleaning robots, which could also be armed with explosives.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Und im Frühjahr sollen Satellitenbilder zeigen, wie sich hier links im Bild an der Hafeneinfahrt von Sevastopol auf der russisch besetzten Halbinsel Krim zwei Delfinbecken befinden. Auch in der Ostsee ist ihr Einsatz theoretisch möglich. Speaker 1: Ich weiß, dass es diese Delfine gibt, allerdings ist die Wassertiefe von achtzig Metern oder siebzig bis achtzig Metern in den beiden Seegebieten zyklischer Nordöstlich von Bornholm schon ein schon eine erhebliche Wassertiefe. Speaker 0: Kein einfacher Terroreinsatz für Tier und Mensch. Theoretisch Könnte Speaker 2: ein Froschmann alleine fünfzig Meter tauchen, also das wäre wäre drin. Allerdings reden wir über hundert Kilogramm TNT Sprengstoff. Das haben seismische Untersuchungen in Schweden ergeben, die haben diese diese Explosion analysiert. Hundert Kilogramm TNT ist nichts, was man sich, glaub ich, auf den auf den Rucksack sozusagen Speaker 0: Technische Hilfsmittel müssten demnach im Spiel gewesen sein, denn Despot aus Moskau mag U-Boote. Doch in der Gegend Bornholm ist die Ostsee kaum mehr als hundert Meter tief und gut überwacht. Unwahrscheinlich, dass ein U-Boot nicht aufgefallen wäre. Ein weiteres Szenario, ein Angriff mit einer Unterwasserdrohne. Speaker 1: Ich nehme an, dass es über Drohnen geplant und durchgeführt worden ist. Und man muss dabei ja auch sehen, dass abgesehen von den militärischen Drohnen, die dafür natürlich auch geeignet sind, es auch möglich ist, Das ist Drohnenwahn, die normalerweise für die Überwachung dieser Pipelines natürlich auch eingesetzt werden, auch eingesetzt werden müssen. Das ist ja auch nicht in der Ostsee so. Also insofern deutet alles darauf hin, dass es technische Mittel waren, die sowohl militärisch als auch zivil eingesetzt werden können. Speaker 0: An den Pipelines soll es ferngesteuerte Reinigungsroboter geben. Die könnten auch mit Sprengstoff bestückt worden sein, sofern die Täter Zugang zu dem Speaker 1: System haben.

@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra

Meanwhile: Possibly Super Secret Underwater Shot leaked of the sabotage. Luisa is finally bringing freedom to Germany (together with her soul partner[s]).

@Luisamneubauer - Luisa Neubauer

🚨 Breaking: Wir sprechen heute Mittag mit Finanzminister @c_lindner über die Bereitstellung eines 100 Milliarden Sondervermögen für Klimaschutz und Sicherheit. Lindner sieht die Erneuerbaren als Freiheitsenergien. Das sehen wir auch so. 1/3

@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra

Meanwhile, more fails from Poland: @radeksikorski deletes his "Thank You, USA" tweet, but as expected - it has been archived over and over again. Radek, are you an internet noob? https://archive.ph/tlnh6 https://t.co/ACpyomF00n* (add the * at the end of the URL for all archives)

@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra

Meanwhile: @ZelenskyyUa "accelerates" @NATO-membership Russia annexes 4 more regions @NATO Chief Stollenberg: "Now we cannot accept Ukraine into NATO" QRD: >receive NATO weapons, training, strategy, foreign NATO soldiers... >"no you cannot join NATO"

@AnnuKaushik253 - Annu Kaushik

Few hours back, Ukraine applied for fast-track NATO membership calling itself a de facto ally. When asked about the same at a presser, NATO chief Jens Stoltenberg gave a vague answer saying that the priority right now is to help Ukraine.👇 #UkraineWar #RussianUkrainianWar

Video Transcript AI Summary
Ukraine has officially applied for NATO membership, and the question is whether NATO is ready to consider their application. NATO states that every democracy in Europe has the right to apply for membership, and they respect Ukraine's right to choose its own security arrangements. However, the decision on membership needs to be taken by all 30 Allies through consensus. Currently, NATO's main focus is providing immediate support to Ukraine in defending itself against the Russian invasion.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Ukraine leadership show us the possible way out of this bloody war and officially applied to NATO membership. My question is NATO ready to consider that kind of applications? And the second part of the question, Is it possible to consider this PD procedure for that kind of membership like it was done for Sweden and Finland? Thank you so much. Speaker 1: Every democracy in Europe has the right to apply for NATO membership, and NATO allies respect [SPEAKER STAVROS VIZIRGIANAKIS:] That's right. And we have stated again and again that NATO's door remains open and we have demonstrated that over the last years. NATO Allies, when they met at the NATO Summit in Madrid, stated also very clearly that We support Ukraine's right to choose its own its own path, to decide, what kind of Security arrangements we want to be part of. Then, a decision on membership, of course, has to be taken by all 30 Allies, and we take these decisions by consensus. Our focus now, is on providing immediate support to Ukraine to help Ukraine defend itself against The Russian brutal invasion, and then that's the main focus and the main effort of NATO allies as we speak.

@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra

After so many happenings, it's time for a relaxing @ZelenskyyUa afterhour. https://eprimefeed.com/latest-news/zelensky-found-a-billion-dollars-and-a-villa-in-miami-2/20181/

Zelensky Found a Billion Dollars and a Villa in Miami - ePrimefeed Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has more than one billion dollars in foreign accounts. This was announced by the deputy from the Opposition Platform – Party For Life Ilya Kiva. According to him, Zelensky has accumulated $1.2 billion in the Dresdner Bank in Costa Rica from Ukrainian oligarchs like Rinat Akhmetov, Viktor Pinchuk, and Igor Kolomoisky. […] eprimefeed.com

@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra

Add.#18: Intermission. (thx 2 Daniela 4 pointing out)

@Bobby_Network - Bobby Rajesh Malhotra

QRD: •🇶🇦 drops EnergyPills: https://archive.ph/r4Zf0 •@OPECSecretariat sides with 🇷🇺-according to Joepedo •@ZelenskyyUa seeks preemtive @NATO strike: https://archive.ph/ehbYP •@georgesoros drafts Any-Time-Mass-Sex-Orgy near Kyiv •@elonmusk's shitposting https://t.co/rVnVo0Oee7

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

War is the ultimate Supreme Court

Saved - February 10, 2023 at 6:10 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The Nord Stream 2 pipeline has been a topic of controversy, with the US and Germany at odds over its construction. Recently, there have been reports of sabotage, with the CIA warning of possible attacks on the pipelines. Some have speculated that the US government may have been involved in the sabotage, with the Navy and NATO holding a training exercise in the area where the pipelines were later sabotaged. The situation is further complicated by the ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine, with some suggesting that the sabotage may be part of a larger proxy war.

@KanekoaTheGreat - kanekoa.substack.com

THREAD🚨 #Nordstream "Last June, the Navy divers, operating under the cover of a widely publicized mid-summer NATO exercise known as BALTOPS 22, planted the remotely triggered explosives that..." https://seymourhersh.substack.com/p/how-america-took-out-the-nord-stream

How America Took Out The Nord Stream Pipeline The New York Times called it a “mystery,” but the United States executed a covert sea operation that was kept secret—until now seymourhersh.substack.com

@KanekoaTheGreat - kanekoa.substack.com

2) BIDEN: “If Russia invades...then there will no longer be a Nord Stream 2. We will bring an end to it." REPORTER: "But how will you do that, exactly, since...the project is in Germany's control?" BIDEN: "I promise you, we will be able to do that." Feb. 7, 2022

Video Transcript AI Summary
If Russia invades Ukraine, Nord Stream 2 will be canceled. Germany will take action to halt the project. However, it is unclear how they will do this since Germany has control over the project.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Let me answer the first question first. If Germany if, if Russia invades, that means tanks or troops crossing the border of Ukraine again, then there will be, we there will be no longer a Nord Stream 2. We will bring it into Speaker 1: But how will you, how will you do that? Exactly. Since the project in control of the project is within Germany's controls?

@KanekoaTheGreat - kanekoa.substack.com

3) Victoria Nuland: “If Russia invades Ukraine, one way or another, Nord Stream 2 will not move forward." Jan. 27, 2022

Video Transcript AI Summary
We are in ongoing discussions with Germany about Nord Stream 2. It is important to note that if Russia invades Ukraine, Nord Stream 2 will not proceed.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: With regard to Nord Stream 2, we continue to have, very strong and clear conversations, with our German allies, and I want to be clear with you today. If Russia invades Ukraine, one way or another, Nord Stream 2 will not move forward.

@KanekoaTheGreat - kanekoa.substack.com

4) @TuckerCarlson: "If you were Vladimir Putin, you would have to be a suicidal moron to blow up your own energy pipelines. Natural gas pipelines are the main source of your power and your wealth and most critically your leverage over other countries. Europe needs your energy."

Video Transcript AI Summary
Vladimir Putin would never blow up his own energy pipelines as they are crucial for Russia's power and leverage over other countries. However, other countries, including the US, have suggested the possibility of sabotaging the Nord Stream pipelines. Joe Biden and Toria Nuland both hinted at stopping Nord Stream if Russia invades Ukraine. While it's hard to believe that the Biden administration would engage in such extreme actions, close allies like Radek Sikorski have thanked the US for the pipeline explosions. The White House has not denied responsibility and instead emphasizes the need for clean energy and reducing gas consumption. If the Biden administration is indeed responsible, it would be a destructive act consistent with their tendency to tear down rather than build.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Vladimir Putin, you would have to be a suicidal moron to blow up your own energy pipelines. That's the one thing you would never do. Natural gas pipelines are the main source of your power and your wealth and most critically, your leverage over other countries. Europe needs your energy, now more than ever with winter approaching. If you can't deliver that energy, then countries like Germany have no need to pay attention to what to want. You're in the middle of a war, an all hands on deck war, so you need all the leverage you can get. Under these circumstances, there is no chance you would blow up Nord Stream 1 or 2, not now, obviously. In fact, it's so obvious that even as our famously dim Terry of State Tony Blinken seemed to acknowledge it. Sabotaging Nord Stream, he said today, is clearly in no one's interest. Right. But really only half right. It is true that blowing up Nord Stream does not help Vladimir Putin. He would not do that. Why would he? But that doesn't mean that other countries wouldn't consider doing it. They would consider it, and we know they have considered it because at least one of them has said so in public. In early February, less than 3 weeks before the war in Ukraine began, Joe Biden suggested on camera that he might take out these pipelines. Watch. Speaker 1: If Russia invades, that means tanks or troops crossing the, the the border of Ukraine Again, then, there will be, we there will be no longer a Norristown too. We we will bring it into Speaker 2: Would you but how will you how will you do that exactly since the project in control of the project is within Germany's Speaker 1: We will, I promise you, we'll be able to do it. Speaker 0: Notice how he phrased that. And he's the president. Doesn't phrase things by accident, particularly when he's reading off cards. He didn't say, I will pause the delivery of gas from Russia to Germany. He said, there won't be a Nord Stream 2. We'll put an end to it. We'll take it out. We'll blow it up. How will you do this? He was asked. I promise you, we will be able to do it. They thought this through. And yet those watching, very much including us, didn't take Biden seriously when he said it. This is the president who has declared climate change the most pressing emergency in This is the man who lectures you about using a wood stove or driving an SUV because of its emissions. This is the guy who spent 1,000,000,000 trying to mitigate cow flatulence, because methane. Would that guy really blow up a methane pipeline in the middle of the Baltic Sea? It was hard to imagine. That would be an unimaginably reckless act. That'd be the kind of thing you would do if you wanted to start a nuclear war. It would be insane. And yet, in retrospect, it's obvious they were thinking about this because Joe Biden wasn't the only person to suggest it. Toria Nuland at the State Department said pretty much the same thing. Nuland is a lifelong war cheerleader. She worked to bring about the Iraq invasion, never apologized, kept going. She helped engineer the coup that overthrew the Ukrainian government, some years back. So capable. Clearly, she's capable of anything. But environmental terrorism? Even for Toria Nuland, that seemed too much, too extreme. And yet here she is in January. Speaker 3: With regard to Nord Stream 2, we continue to have, very strong and clear conversations, With our German allies, and I wanna be clear with you today. If Russia invades Ukraine, one way or Another, Nord Stream 2 will not move forward. Speaker 0: One way or the other, We'll stop Nord Stream. Now looking back, those words seem chilling 8 months later as natural gas pours into the Baltic Sea and into the atmosphere. So you have to ask, could the Biden administration really do something like this? We can't say for sure. We don't know for sure. We can tell you that close Allies of the Biden White House believe they certainly did do it. Radek Sikorski is a Polish politician. He's chairman of the EU USA delegation in the European Parliament. He's connected. He's also the husband of regime stenographer Ann Applebaum of The Atlantic Magazine. Sikorsky is so close to Joe Biden that he's got a picture of the 2 of them together in his Twitter profile. So when the pipelines blew up, Sikorsky responded immediately. And here's what he wrote. Thank you, USA. So once again, did the Biden administration really do this? It's hard to believe. Given that it's an atrocity, It's effectively an act of terrorism. We don't wanna make that accusation. But we should tell you that, maybe not coincidentally, Today, a brand new pipeline was unveiled. The pipeline that carries non Russian natural gas in roughly the same area as Nord Stream's 1 and 2. This is called the Baltic Pipe. It was inaugurated in Poland. It will carry natural gas from Norway through Denmark to Poland and other countries nearby. And it's likely to do very well since now It has less competition. Making sense? What does the White House say about this? How are they accounting for what happened today? Well, they're not exactly enthusiastically denying responsibility for it. Instead, they're looking at the upside. Here's the president's publicist noting that the destruction of yet another Energy pipeline is yet another opportunity for you to buy an electric car. Speaker 2: As you all know, these pipelines weren't pumping gas into Europe At this time, NS 2 was never operational, as you guys know. NS 1 has not been operational for weeks because, Putin has weaponized, energy. And we have said this many times before. This just drives home the importance of our efforts to work together to get alternative gas Supplies to Europe and to support efforts to reduce gas consumption and accelerate true energy independence by moving to clean energy Economy. Speaker 0: Oh, moving to clean energy, say the people who very may well be responsible for letting methane into the Baltic Sea and into the atmosphere at a scale that most people can't imagine. The people lecturing you about your SUV may have blown up a natural gas pipeline and created one of the great catastrophes of our time and its effect on the environment. If they did this, this will be one of the craziest, most destructive things any American administration has ever done. But it would also be totally consistent with what they do. What do they do? They destroy. These people build nothing. Not one thing. Instead, they tear down and desecrate, from historic statues, to the Constitution, to energy infrastructure. And no one in Congress is trying to stop any of it. They're just preparing for the inevitable fallout.

@KanekoaTheGreat - kanekoa.substack.com

5) The CIA warned authorities in Berlin three months before the Nordstream pipeline was sabotaged of the possibility that someone would destroy the pipelines. I wonder how they knew? https://www.reuters.com/world/cia-warned-berlin-about-possible-attacks-gas-pipelines-summer-spiegel-2022-09-27/

CIA warned Berlin about possible attacks on gas pipelines in summer - Spiegel The U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) had weeks ago warned Germany about possible attacks on gas pipelines in the Baltic Sea, German magazine Spiegel said on Tuesday, after gas leaks in Russia pipelines to Germany were reported. reuters.com

@KanekoaTheGreat - kanekoa.substack.com

6) The people who told you Iraq has WMDs want you to believe Russia blew up its own pipeline. The US Government previously lied Americans into war using the Gulf of Tonkin, USS Maine, RMS Lusitania, Iraqi incubator babies, and WMDs. But trust them this time.

@KanekoaTheGreat - kanekoa.substack.com

7) The gas pipelines were sabotaged near Bornholm in the Baltic Sea. The leaks occurred in areas where the pipelines lie at sufficiently shallow depths for divers to plant explosives.

@KanekoaTheGreat - kanekoa.substack.com

8) The US Navy and NATO held a major maritime training exercise in the Baltic Sea involving scores of allied ships throughout the region. The event was held off the coast of Bornholm Island and involved teams of divers who happened to be planting and locating explosives.

@KanekoaTheGreat - kanekoa.substack.com

9) The US Navy posted pictures of themselves planting "mock explosives" in the Baltic Sea where the pipelines would explode three months later. But don't worry, it was a "training exercise." https://www.navy.mil/Press-Office/News-Stories/Article/3060311/baltops-22-a-perfect-opportunity-for-research-and-testing-new-technology/

BALTOPS 22: A perfect opportunity for research and testing new technology BALTIC SEA - Exercise Baltic Operations (BALTOPS) 22, the premier maritime-focused exercise in the Baltic region, began June 5, 2022, in the Baltic Sea. With a significant focus of BALTOPS every year navy.mil

@KanekoaTheGreat - kanekoa.substack.com

10) Uncle Joe, the climate change warrior, would never blow up a natural gas pipeline in the ocean, right? If Joe truly cared, his son Hunter wouldn't be invested in the world's worst polluting Chinese-government-owned oil, gas, and coal companies. https://kanekoa.substack.com/p/hunter-biden-invested-1-billion-into

Joe Crushes American Energy While Hunter Gets Rich From Chinese Fossil Fuels Joe Biden fights climate change in the United States, while his son's Chinese private equity fund holds investments in Chinese oil giant, Sinopec, which creates more CO2 emissions than all of Canada. kanekoa.substack.com

@KanekoaTheGreat - kanekoa.substack.com

11) Prof. Jeffrey Sachs caused chaos on Bloomberg for suggesting the U.S. government was behind the Nord Stream sabotage. "The destruction of the Nord Stream pipeline which I would bet was a U.S. action..."

Video Transcript AI Summary
The decline in output and living standards has led to a rise in prices in the European economy. The sudden cutoff of energy and the destruction of the Nord Stream pipeline, which may have been a US and Poland action, have further impacted the situation. Radar evidence suggests that US military helicopters were circling the area, and there were previous threats from the United States to end Nord Stream. Secretary Blinken's statement about it being a tremendous opportunity raises questions. Despite being against the narrative in the West, many people worldwide believe the US is responsible. However, there is a lack of evidence and counterbalance in the media.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The sharp decline of output in living standards also shows up as a rise of prices. But the the main fact is that the European economy is getting hammered by this, by the sudden cutoff of energy. And now, to make it, definitive, the destruction of the the Nord Stream pipeline which I I would bet was a US action, perhaps US and and Poland. This is But, Jeff, we're gonna stop there. That's a that's Quite a statement as well. Why do you feel Absolutely. That that was a US action? What evidence do you have of that? Well, first of all, there's direct radar evidence that US, helicopters, military helicopters that are normally based in Gdansk, were, circling over this area. We also had the threats From the United States earlier in this year that one way or another, we are going to end Nord Stream. We also have a remarkable statement by secretary Blinken last Friday in a press conference that he says, This is also a tremendous opportunity. It's a strange way to it's sorry. It's a strange way to talk if you're worried about the piracy on international infrastructure vital significance. So I know this runs counter to our narrative. It runs you're not allowed to say these things, in in, in the west. But the fact of the matter is All over the world, when I talk to people, they think the US did it. So that's not And and by by the way, even reporters on our Papers that are involved, tell me privately, yeah, well, of course, but it doesn't show up in our our media. Professor, I'm gonna wanna get into a different pat about what Did or did not happen with Nord Stream? Because I don't have the evidence, and we don't have a a counterbalance to this. There is an issue though that's at the

@KanekoaTheGreat - kanekoa.substack.com

12) @JoeRogan and @ComicDaveSmith break down the reasons Russia invaded Ukraine: "The most important priority in the history of humanity is that America and Russia do not go to war."

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker expresses concern about the escalating tensions between the US and Russia, emphasizing the importance of avoiding a nuclear conflict. They mention reports that the US discouraged Ukraine from negotiating with Russia at the beginning of the war, despite having a potential deal in place. The speaker criticizes the official narrative that portrays Vladimir Putin as a madman and a threat to Europe, while also downplaying his nuclear threats. They draw parallels to the misrepresentation of Osama bin Laden's motivations and argue for listening to the enemy's perspective. The speaker acknowledges that Putin was wrong to invade Ukraine but argues that there was provocation. They highlight the broken promise of NATO not expanding eastward and the current presence of NATO forces on Russia's border.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This thing with Russia is just like the craziest thing in the world. Like, the idea that we're actually flirting with a nuclear conflict with Russia is the most important priority in the history of humanity, is that America and Russia do not go to war. There's nothing more important than that. That's that's it. We'll destroy the the human species if we do this. And yet, there's this war right on Russia's border and there's no effort to negotiate going on. There's, like, no effort. In fact, from from very, solid reporting that actually, America through Boris Johnson in in it, told Ukraine not to negotiate with Russia at the very beginning of the war, when they had a deal worked out. They had a they had a deal worked out. It's been reported in multiple sources that they had a deal worked out. And the deal was basically that Vladimir Putin would pull back, he would pull back his troops and leave Ukraine under the condition that the very simple conditions that Ukraine, guaranteed, autonomy for the Donbas region and agreed to never join NATO. And, like, that was a deal. Like, okay. I'm not saying everyone thinks that's the perfect deal, but it's better than what we got right now. Better than nuclear war. And right now, just the other day, dude, the official narrative on this this whole war, it's just like it makes no sense. And, again, like I said, remember, the same people who are pushing this are the ones who are telling you Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction and stuff. But The official narrative, Joe, is basically that, okay, so, Vladimir Putin is a madman, a crazy war criminal who's hell bent on, reforming the Soviet Union and this is a real threat that he could do this, but also he's he's getting humiliated in this war in Ukraine. So, like, he's he's losing the poorest country in Europe and he's just getting humiliated and beat back, but he's still a real threat to take over all of Europe. And he's a complete madman, by the way, Joe. But when he says he's gonna use nuclear weapons, don't listen to that. He'd never actually do that even though he's a complete madman. And as everyone says, this this war, the word they use over and over and over again, Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, Hillary Clinton, all of them, unprovoked. Vladimir Putin led an unprovoked war in Ukraine. But then, it's just like with Osama Bin Laden, what they did with him then. Don't listen to him. Whatever you do, don't listen to what he's actually saying, because none of that's his motivations. Like, what his motivations are, what we tell you. Osama bin Laden hates us, because we're free. And then, like, Ron Paul would just go, like, yeah. But that's not what he's saying at all. Like, oh, he, Osama bin Laden was so clear about why he hated America. I mean, he's like look, I hate you because you murder innocent civilians in the Muslim world, you prop up brutal dictators in the Muslim world, you prop up Israel who mistreats the Palestinian people, and you have our your, your bases in our holy land in the Arabian Peninsula. Then they're, like, nah, he hates us because we're free. Like, he didn't mention anything about freedom there. And then if you say that, they're, like, well, are you defending Osama Bin Laden? And, like, no. I'm just saying listen to your enemies. There's a reason why he hates us. And if you listen to Vladimir Putin and what he's saying I mean, look, he's wrong for invading, Ukraine. And, I mean, you know me, Joe. I'm the most anti war fuck fucking person there is, and there's no excuse for that. Like, tens of thousands of people have died. It's horrible. And a lot of them are soldiers, but a lot of them are civilians and, but to say he was unprovoked is, like, insane. It's just only people who know nothing about the history of this conflict would say there was no provocation. Did you see the conversation that Roger Waters had with that CNN guy? She had. Right? Because Roger Waters was awesome on that. Yeah. Because he knows what he's talking about, dude. And he he's right about all of that shit. He's look, the the promise, and this is what he was saying, he's absolutely right, that the promise when the Soviet Union collapsed in 1991 and this was, like verbally promised and put in writing, was that NATO would not expand 1 inch to the East and NATO at that point. The line then was through Germany. Right? Like, the the the western half of Germany was in the West and the eastern half was with the Soviet Union and they were, like, we'll let all of these nations, you know, secede and the Soviet Union will collapse and we're giving up on communism, so one of the greatest things that ever happened and the deal was, okay, you do that, then we won't move NATO. We won't move our military alliance into your area that used to be your realm of influence. And every single president since then has moved NATO East to the point that NATO is now on Russia's border. And in Ukraine, even though they didn't officially join NATO, there was always talk of it, Kamala Harris, very right before the start of the war, said we're looking to put Ukraine into NATO and the, the, you know, they put under George W Bush, they put in, in Poland these dual use rocket launchers, there's a big complaint that Vladimir Putin has, that he's like these can be used to get nukes here in a matter of minutes, like this is a this is like a threat to us that we cannot tolerate.

@KanekoaTheGreat - kanekoa.substack.com

13) @JoeRogan and @ComicDaveSmith break down the Obama admin overthrowing Ukraine's government: "All these Soros-funded NGOs funded the militias on the ground... There's a tape of Victoria Nuland talking about who would be the new government... We overthrew their government."

Video Transcript AI Summary
In 2014, there was a coup in Ukraine led by the West. The goal was to attract Ukraine to the West and away from Russia. The Ukrainian government was pro-Russia, but the West wanted a pro-America government. George Soros-funded NGOs supported the militias that overthrew the government. The US State Department was involved in choosing the new government. Ukraine's importance to Putin was a red line. The impeachment of the previous US president and the involvement of the current president's son in Ukraine are connected to this conflict. Burisma, a company linked to the old pro-Russia government, bribed Joe Biden's son. Trump wanted Ukraine to investigate this. Obama didn't send weapons to Ukraine, but Trump did. This context led to Putin invading Ukraine.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Then in 2014, there was a coup in Ukraine that was completely led by the West. And there's I I don't know if you've ever heard, but, like, like, I think I sent you actually once the, the tape of Gideon Rose, who was the editor for Foreign Fairs Magazine on the old Stephen Colbert Report, show, back when Colbert was hilarious. And he was just openly bragging about what the game is here. And then he was like, well, Ukraine is kinda like the Robin to Russia's Batman. And so our job is to steal Robin away from Batman And make him come over here and join us. And, Vladimir Putin's so stupid that he won't do anything. And then Colbert's in his old character. So he's like, well, shouldn't Obama be spiking the football and saying, yeah, in your face, Putin. And Gideon Rose is like, well, no, no, because then Putin might invade Ukraine. So we wouldn't wanna spike the ball, But they there there's these oh, yeah. Here it is. Let's play it. Let's play it. Go from the beginning. Yeah. Play it from the beginning. There Speaker 1: there's the magazine, Foreign Affairs. Now now now now, Gideon, help me out here. We've got a we've got a battle. The Ukraine, some of them wanna go into the EU, the European Union Right. And some of them wanna stay with Russia. If the Ukraine's not in Europe right now, what continent is it on? Speaker 2: Well, it's part of Eurasia, but it's part of Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Bloc. Uh-huh. It's basically Robin to Russia's Batman. And the challenge here the challenge here is to try to attract it to the West to get it to flip sides. Speaker 1: So the the rebels in the streets, what are they fighting for? Speaker 2: They're fighting for a better future. Countries have a developed That Speaker 1: sounds like a political So Speaker 2: but it's actually Countries have to develop over time. And Ukraine, basically, after it the end of the Soviet Union faced two tracks. It could stay as sort of stagnant, Corrupt, authoritarian country tied to Russia, or it could essentially join the West. It could modernize, liberalize, become a democracy. At the last minute, when it looked like it was gonna trade up from its sort of, abusive relationship with its boyfriend from the hood to a a nice Guppy, Speaker 1: You're not loading these choices anyway whatsoever. Speaker 2: It's actually true. When it looked like it was gonna trade up to a better, environment, at the last minute, Putin offered a bribe. Speaker 1: How much? Speaker 2: 15,000,000,000. That's Speaker 1: a lot of cash. Speaker 2: It's a lot of cash. And the president, who himself was tied to the old elites And the eastern part of the country ties to Russia decided to back off the change and go for Russia. Speaker 1: Pirate themed restaurants you can buy with $15,000,000,000? Speaker 2: The problem was the western parts of the country and the younger parts of the country and the more modern liberal parts of the country basically knew that they had no future being Russia's Russia's vassal. Do Do we they took to the streets. Speaker 1: Is America taking sides in this in any way? If if these people the the rebels are winning them right now, right? Speaker 2: Yes. Just recently. Speaker 1: Why isn't Obama spiking the ball in the end zone and calling Putin and saying, hey. You might have won the medal count, but we won the country count, biatch. It's Speaker 2: actually a very good question. And the answer is that we don't want Russia to intervene and kick over the table like a gamer risk And take Ukraine back. Speaker 0: And so Speaker 1: Will they do that? Could he send in troops? Yes. Speaker 2: He could. So we are choosing Does Speaker 1: Ukraine have any troops of their own? Would they fight back? Speaker 2: Yes. But we don't want this to Escalate, and we don't want Russia to crack down. So we wanna basically distract Russia. Oh, look, you have the highest medal count. Oh, you did really well. And that's possible. The Olympics. Speaker 1: There's a shiny object. I'll just take an entire country away from you. Speaker 2: Holy shit. Speaker 1: Now Isn't Speaker 0: that funny? Speaker 1: There's a power vacuum right now. Speaker 2: There's a power vacuum. The opposition is all together, which everybody it's it's easy to agree on getting rid of the bad old regime and much harder To create a stable country in which everybody compromises and moves forward. So Speaker 1: They need a strong leader to move the country forward. Do you know who's always good Speaker 3: at a moment like that? Vladimir Putin. Speaker 1: Do you think he might volunteer to come in and and and help Ukraine Speaker 2: find We don't want we don't want we don't want Putin to get involved in this, and so we are basically we wanna try and involve him in this decision so that he allows Ukraine to go. We actually wanna not We wanna say we want a nonexclusive relationship with Ukraine. You can have a relationship with it too. Speaker 1: You're the only one making this into a girlfriend, boyfriend relationship. Speaker 2: Ukraine is basically Choosing its future between 2 completely different courses of action, and we're trying to blur that choice so the old boyfriend doesn't get too upset when it has the right choice. Speaker 0: So so it's just all these George Soros funded NGOs were funding the the militias on the ground who were overthrowing the the government. And then there's a tape of Victoria Nuland, who's who's, was at the state department at the time, one of the top people at the state department. And she was basically talking about who would be the new government that took over who America didn't want in, who we did want in the new government. So it's not you know, what happened basically was as Gideon Rose was even saying, the Ukrainian government was kind of siding with Russia, or at least a lot more pro Russia, and then we overthrew that government and installed the pro America pro government. And this to Putin, he had said over and over again, was a huge red line for him. Like, Ukraine was the big line. And you could look, Imagine take it from our point of view, if, like, Russia was coming over here and overthrowing the pro America government in Montreal and installing a pro Russia government there. Speaker 2: Right. Speaker 0: Then, you know, like, this would be seen as would you call that an unprovoked attack? Right. You know, if we were to go in there and then go overthrow that government so, again, I'm not justifying what he's doing. But and then the other thing to this, right, That's important to add is, like, you remember the 2 big things that it's so weird no one, like, at least in the in the larger conversation, I don't see anyone connecting these things, is that there's 2 things like involving Ukraine that they were very big, that happened very recently in American history that very much connect to this war. And one is that Our last president was impeached over a thing with Ukraine and like what was that? And then the other thing is, the current president's son was getting paid 1,000,000 of dollars from a company, Burisma, in Ukraine and these things all connect. Basically, what happened was after the 2014 coup. This company, Burisma, they were and by the way, Matt Taibbi has done incredible reporting on this. I highly recommend everyone read his of, his subsects. Incredible. Fantastic. Unbelievable. But so, basically, Burisma was in bed with the old government that had allied with Russia. And so when this government was overthrown, they were very worried because they were like, oh, we were in bed with the old government and now there's this new government who's in there. And so instead of bribing the new government, they just went right to the source and bribed The son of the sitting vice president, bro, Joe Biden, when he was vice president, was in charge of Ukraine policy. Oh my god. So they just went that was why they put him there. Way. And then they put some other, like, CIA guy or something like that on their board. They're just paying them money to just be, like, hey, keep us in with you. And then Trump was telling them to investigate all of this shit. He got on the phone with them and was like, I want to investigate everything that was going on with Joe and Hunter Biden in Ukraine. And Donald Trump did. He got into an area that it was there's an argument it was not okay what he was doing, because he was kinda going like, Maybe you don't get this these, these weapons that I was gonna send in unless you go investigate them and this was his political opponent, so it was a little bit of a shady thing. But then the other story about that is that ultimately, Trump caved and he sent in the weapons to Ukraine. So now, not only did Obama Overthrow the regime when Joe Biden was the point man. Joe Biden was running Ukraine policy. Obama leads this coup, overthrows that government and puts in a pro Western government, then Trump comes in, sends in a whole bunch of weapons to this new government that Obama wouldn't even send in because he was concerned it would provoke, Russia. And then the next president is Joe Biden, the last guy who was the point man on Ukraine, who who was there when this coup happened, then he comes back in. This is all like the context that led to Vladimir Putin invading Ukraine.

@KanekoaTheGreat - kanekoa.substack.com

14) The Obama administration overthrew Ukraine's elected government in 2014. John McCain rallied protestors, and Victoria Nuland was caught on tape planning Ukraine's new government. What role did this have on the current NATO proxy war in Ukraine?

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the presence of a guest from the United States who frequently visited and supported protests in Ukraine. They express concern about the excessive use of force by the authorities during these protests. The speaker questions the appropriateness of supporting the protesters and creating conflict when they occupy government buildings. They also mention their contact with Vice President Biden and criticize the inconsistency between his words and actions in Ukraine. The speaker suggests that the US ambassador in Ukraine regularly met with representatives of the protests, giving the impression that there was a headquarters managing the process.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Очень час гостями были штатов, кадры смены были госпожа Ну, проезжал очень часто у нас были ней дискуссии, Но после этих дискуссии она шла на Май дан и поддерживала протест. И об право органы прим чрезмерно сила. На самом деле эти все мыс мы видели на Май дань Делегация много проезжал я, что нельзя нельзя говорить, во-первых, неправ. Нельзя становиться на сторону митинг и отстаивать их права, создавая тем самым и углу конфликт. Когда митинг захватывает правительство здание учреждения скажите Допустимо ли это в любой другой стране, например, чтобы посол Украины пришел к митинг фермер и раз там пряники или пирожки и обмен полицейских Соединенных Штатов Америки. Я считаю, что это недопустимо ни в одной европейской стране. А почему к украине было такое отношение Я постоянно имел контакт с вод байден, ви президентом. У меня были частые с ним телефоны п. Но дело в том, что господин Байден говорил одно, а в Украине делали другое. Посол Соединенных Штатов в Украине постоянно принимал представителей май, у себя в посол мы это очень хорошо знали, мы это от и создавал создавалась такое впечатление, что в посол Соединенных штатов существует штаб, который управляет этим процессом.

@KanekoaTheGreat - kanekoa.substack.com

15) After the U.S. overthrew Ukraine's government in 2014, 96% of Luhansk and 89% of Donetsk voted to secede from Ukraine. The west said the elections were illegitimate. But the eastern half of Ukraine typically votes for pro-Russia candidates. Blue = Pro-Russia Red = Pro-West

@KanekoaTheGreat - kanekoa.substack.com

16) If the military-industrial complex sabotaged Nordstream, it would be one of the craziest, most destructive terrorist acts any American administration has ever done. Blowing up a gas pipeline to Europe during an energy crisis and escalating a war with nuclear-armed Russia.

@KanekoaTheGreat - kanekoa.substack.com

17) @Jimmy_Dore: "Your enemy is not China, your enemy is not Russia, your enemy is the Military Industrial Complex..." The bottom line is there will be no world left for our children if this war between nuclear superpowers continues to escalate.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker criticizes the United States for provoking and threatening nuclear powers, claiming that Americans are unaware of their own foreign policy. They argue that the military-industrial complex benefits from these actions, while the American people suffer from job losses and corruption. The speaker highlights the excessive military budget and the numerous military bases surrounding China. They assert that China is not an enemy, but rather the military-industrial complex is the true adversary. The speaker also mentions the conflicts in Ukraine and Syria, attributing them to economic interests and imperialism. They conclude by emphasizing the need to recognize the true motives behind these actions.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Think it means is that the United States is trying to provoke and sable Ratter with another nuclear power. Right? This is what we were supposed to be afraid of what's gonna happen with Donald Trump. Right? We couldn't have, he's a crazy man who's gonna have his finger on the nuclear button, and now we have Dementia Joe who is saber rattling with 2 nuclear powers, and they get the corporate media sponsored by the military industrial complex to get Americans to cheer it on. And why do Americans cheer it on? Because they have no idea what's actually happening with their foreign policy. And what's worse is they have no idea that they have no idea with that. They don't have any idea what's happening with their foreign policy. We have 400 military bases surrounding China since the Korean War. Do we really think that China is getting ready to invade the United States because I tell you they're not. They make everything we use in the United States. Why? Because the same people who want this war are the same people who took the good jobs that are manufacturing jobs in America, turned them into low paying crappy jobs, and then shipped them to China, and then we get angry at them for the system that we set up if they're so corrupt. Because that's the thing, Americans have no idea how corrupt their government is. They think our government's just regular corrupt, like, oh, Trump gave his son a job or Biden gave his kid a no pa a no show job in the Ukraine war. That's not the whole thing is corrupt. The $800,000,000,000 military budget is $800,000,000,000 of corruption. Why do we have to have 8, 8, 900 military bases around. We're the ones provoking this war. Just like we provoked the war in Ukraine, we are now provoking a war with China. And what who who benefits? I'll tell you right now. Your enemy is not China. Your enemy is not Russia. Your enemy is the military industrial complex, which has been fleecing this country to the tunes of 100 of 1,000,000,000 and 1,000,000,000,000 of dollars. How many times are we gonna have a defense secretary say, hey, we can't account for $2,000,000,000,000 in the Pentagon again. That like, which has happened twice now in my lifetime. So, again, people are being, the the war machine cannot be stopped. Who's running this country? The war machine. It certainly isn't Joe Biden making these decisions. I would like to know who is making the decisions, and I just wanna remind everybody, the United States is the world's terrorist. We just set the Middle East on fire in the last 20 years, and now we're doing a proxy war in Ukraine, which we provoked, NATO provoked, and was just admitted that we provoked it by the former prime minister of Germany, and now we're trying to sable rather with with China, and they're predicting a war. Again, China's not gonna invade us. China's not our enemy. Then we might have an economic war. That's what these are. These are economic wars. These are wars for in Ukraine, it's about liquefied natural gas and making sure Germany and Russia never come together because we fear Russia's, natural resources and manpower, and we fear them getting together with Germany with their technology and their capital, and so that's why we blew up the Nord Stream pipeline. That's why we're doing the Ukraine war. This is all about hegemony, imperialism, and economics. And if there's a marine somewhere, it's there because they're about to steal some natural resources from another country. As everybody's screaming about what a bad guy hide Putin as for invading Ukraine. The United States is currently occupying a third of Syria. And which third is that? It's the third that has the oil. And how do I know we're there to steal their oil? Because the president of the United States said so. And we're not we're not even benefiting economically. That's, I mean, of course, that's the rub. Jimmy Dore, appreciate it. Thank you.

@KanekoaTheGreat - kanekoa.substack.com

18) Did you know that only 10% of my posts make it to your home page feed? If you appreciate my work — and don't want to miss anything, please consider hitting the bell on my profile page. 🙏♥️🌎 @KanekoaTheGreat

Saved - February 11, 2023 at 1:56 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Russia is draining a massive reservoir in southern Ukraine, endangering the drinking water of hundreds of thousands of people, agricultural production, and safety at Europe's largest nuclear plant. Water levels have been plummeting since late last year, and the drainage is so drastic that new shoreline is emerging. The Kakhovka Reservoir is also the source of cooling water for the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant, and if water levels fall much lower, the plant's safety will be at risk. The reason for the drainage is believed to be an attempt to damage Ukraine's economy.

@gbrumfiel - Geoff Brumfiel

BREAKING: Satellite images and data obtained by @NPR show that Russia is draining a massive reservoir in southern Ukraine. At stake is drinking water for 100,000s of people, agricultural production, and safety at Europe's largest nuclear plant. 🧵 https://www.npr.org/2023/02/10/1155761686/russia-is-draining-a-massive-ukrainian-reservoir-endangering-a-nuclear-plant

Russia is draining a massive Ukrainian reservoir, endangering a nuclear plant Satellite data show water levels plummeting at the Kakhovka Reservoir. The reservoir supplies drinking water, irrigates vast tracts of farmland, and cools Europe's largest nuclear plant. npr.org

@gbrumfiel - Geoff Brumfiel

The data is pretty stark. Since late last year, water levels have been plummeting at Kakhovka. They're now at their lowest levels in 30 years. For perspective, this is like watching the Great Salt Lake in Utah empty out in a matter of months.

@gbrumfiel - Geoff Brumfiel

The drainage is so drastic that new shoreline is now emerging all along the reservoir. Satellite images from @planet show hundreds of meters of silty deposits that have suddenly appeared. (Pictured is a year-on-year comparison for consistency.)

@gbrumfiel - Geoff Brumfiel

This reservoir supplies drinking water to hundreds of thousands of people throughout Ukraine's arid south. It's also used to irrigate roughly half-a-million acres (200k hectares) of land. https://www.npr.org/2023/02/10/1155761686/russia-is-draining-a-massive-ukrainian-reservoir-endangering-a-nuclear-plant

Russia is draining a massive Ukrainian reservoir, endangering a nuclear plant Satellite data show water levels plummeting at the Kakhovka Reservoir. The reservoir supplies drinking water, irrigates vast tracts of farmland, and cools Europe's largest nuclear plant. npr.org

@gbrumfiel - Geoff Brumfiel

And it's the source of cooling water for the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant. If water levels fall much lower, the plant's safety will once again be at risk. The @iaeaorg was so concerned it put out a statement on water levels late last week. https://www.iaea.org/newscenter/pressreleases/update-145-iaea-director-general-statement-on-situation-in-ukraine

Update 145 – IAEA Director General Statement on Situation in Ukraine | IAEA iaea.org

@gbrumfiel - Geoff Brumfiel

To understand why this is happening, you need to look at the dam which controls the reservoir's water level. It's the Kakhovka Hydroelectric Power Plant. The plant sits on the front lines of the war, and since November, sluice gates on the Russian side have been open.

@gbrumfiel - Geoff Brumfiel

There's been a lot of speculation whether this is happening because of a controlled demolition by the Russians on 11 Nov. It is not. We know this because satellite photos from the day of the demolition (left) show the gates are closed (all images from @maxar).

@gbrumfiel - Geoff Brumfiel

Instead it appears that the Russians blew up the road over the dam and then used the dam's gantry cranes (pictured below) to raise the sluice gates about a day later. They've been open ever since.

@gbrumfiel - Geoff Brumfiel

Why are they doing this? @davidhelms570 (who has been tracking the situation very closely) believes that this is about damaging Ukraine's economy. "It's as good as knocking out the power grid," he says. https://www.npr.org/2023/02/10/1155761686/russia-is-draining-a-massive-ukrainian-reservoir-endangering-a-nuclear-plant

Russia is draining a massive Ukrainian reservoir, endangering a nuclear plant Satellite data show water levels plummeting at the Kakhovka Reservoir. The reservoir supplies drinking water, irrigates vast tracts of farmland, and cools Europe's largest nuclear plant. npr.org

@gbrumfiel - Geoff Brumfiel

Helms says Russia may be doing it in part because for years after it seized Crimea in 2014, Ukraine cut off its water. The water for Crimea comes via a 400km channel from this reservoir, and after the invasion Russia moved to restore its water supply. https://www.npr.org/2022/06/12/1104418128/russia-ukraine-crimea-water-canal

Russia has achieved at least 1 of its war goals: return Ukraine's water to Crimea Access to water for the Crimean Peninsula was one of the issues that led to the Russian invasion of Ukraine. npr.org

@gbrumfiel - Geoff Brumfiel

Helms says that over the summer, Russia filled reservoirs throughout Crimea. The same day the dam was blown and the sluice gates were likely opened, Russia's TASS news agency said Crimea now had enough water for 2 years. https://tass.com/russia/1535583

Crimea’s water reservoirs have enough water for two years — authorities In May 2014, Ukraine cut water supplies to Crimea from the Kherson Region via the North Crimean canal tass.com

@gbrumfiel - Geoff Brumfiel

On strange thing: as Helms himself points out, the reservoir supplies water mainly to Russian-held territory. "It just seems strange that they'd be doing a scorched-earth on territory that they claim publicly that they want to keep," @BrianKuns told me.

@gbrumfiel - Geoff Brumfiel

@BrianKuns Another possibility is that the Russians opened the gates to flood the lower Dnipro River and prevent a Ukrainian advance. A statement from the Zaporizhzhia Regional Military Authority earlier this week suggested that may be the motivation. https://t.me/zoda_gov_ua/16501

Запорізька обласна військова адміністрація Для ліквідації загроз на дніпровському каскаді необхідний міжнародний вплив 6 лютого відбулося позачергове засідання Державної комісії з питань техногенно-екологічної безпеки та надзвичайних ситуацій під головуванням Прем'єр-міністра України Дениса Шмигаля. До засідання долучилися перший заступник начальника ЗОВА Геннадій Тімченко, заступник начальника ЗОВА Віталій Сиволап та керівниця апарату ОВА Зінаїда Бойко. Комісія розглянула низку важливих питань, зокрема і про стан наповнення каскаду дніпровських водосховищ та можливі ризики для водозабезпечення Херсонської, Запорізької та Дніпропетровської областей. Учасники заслухали інформацію Міністра захисту довкілля та природних ресурсів, а також першого заступника начальника ЗОВА Геннадія Тімченка, інших посадовців щодо рівня води у Каховському водосховищі й можливих негативних наслідків у разі його подальшого зниження. У зв’язку з неконтрольованим скидом води на Каховській ГЕС, рівень води у Каховському водосховищу стрімко знижується, оскільки обсяги скиду… t.me

@gbrumfiel - Geoff Brumfiel

Regardless of motivation, the events at Kakhovka Reservoir will have major repercussions. Late Spring is when the water level is historically highest. There is very likely going to be a regional water crisis in this part Ukraine later this year. https://www.npr.org/2023/02/10/1155761686/russia-is-draining-a-massive-ukrainian-reservoir-endangering-a-nuclear-plant

Russia is draining a massive Ukrainian reservoir, endangering a nuclear plant Satellite data show water levels plummeting at the Kakhovka Reservoir. The reservoir supplies drinking water, irrigates vast tracts of farmland, and cools Europe's largest nuclear plant. npr.org

@gbrumfiel - Geoff Brumfiel

Many many thanks to @davidhelms570 for sharing so much knowledge that he has been spewing into the Twitter void for weeks. And to @tom_bike. Also my colleagues @JulianHayda, @connjie, @jsfenfen and @mererizzo who have worked really long hours to bring this story to you.

Saved - February 11, 2023 at 1:40 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Russia has reportedly attacked the Zatoka Bridge in Ukraine using an explosives-laden uncrewed surface vessel (USV). The attack, which caused limited damage, marks a major new threat for Ukraine. The bridge is a strategic link between Ukraine and Moldova/Romania and has been targeted by Russia before. Ukraine's USVs use StarLink from Space X for real-time control, but Space X has taken steps to prevent Ukraine from using the technology in drones, dealing a significant blow to Ukraine's military.

@CovertShores - H I Sutton

***BREAKING*** Reported attack by #Russian maritime drone on Zatoka Bridge, Ukraine, Feb 10, 2023 This is significant. Thread 1 /8 #OSINT

@CovertShores - H I Sutton

2 /8 Video of the bridge being attacked is being widely shared on social media. This appears credible. What follows is a hot take, caveats apply

@CovertShores - H I Sutton

3 /8 Some reports say it was an "underwater drone". I think that actually it is an explosives laden uncrewed surface vessel (USV) This is the same concept that #Ukraine used so effectively against Russia in late last year The Ukrainian one, from http://www.hisutton.com/Ukraine-Maritime-Drones.html

@CovertShores - H I Sutton

4 /8 This is a major new development, #Russia was not known to have these types of drones, or to think in these terms Even if the attack did limited damage (as reported) it is a major new threat for Ukraine

@CovertShores - H I Sutton

5 /8 The bridge is a strategic link between Ukraine and Moldova/Romania and has been targeted by Russia before, but with limited success Previously in April 2022, missile strikes:

@CovertShores - H I Sutton

6 /8 A large number of small fast boats were active around Sevastopol earlier today. Many were likely guarding Russian warships used to launch Kalibr missiles on Ukraine from Ukrainian USVs. But some might have been these USVs. Possibly

@CovertShores - H I Sutton

7 /8 #Ukraine's USVs appear to use StarLink from Space X for real-time control However Space X has taken steps to prevent Ukraine using the technology in "drones" This is a significant blow for Ukraine's military https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-64579267

Ukraine war: Elon Musk's SpaceX firm bars Kyiv from using Starlink tech for drone control The firm says it has limited Kyiv's ability to use its Starlink satellite internet for military ends. bbc.com

@CovertShores - H I Sutton

8 / 8 If Russia is able to use these explosive drones against Ukrainian coastal targets, but Ukraine can no longer attack Russian warships in the same way, we may see another shift in the war in the Black Sea. This time in Russia's favor again.

@CovertShores - H I Sutton

9 /8 Afterthought: one scenario to watch for is Russia using them against merchant shipping going to Ukraine under the grain deal and then denying it and blaming Ukrainian drones and/or mines Previous suspected Russian attack on merchant ship off Ukraine, Feb 2022:

Saved - February 21, 2023 at 2:15 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Reports suggest that the US has approved targeted strikes on Crimea, leading to Russian state TV declaring war on the US. The situation has escalated the War in Ukraine, with Russia placing its nuclear submarines on high alert and conducting naval exercises in the Baltic Sea. China is also set to provide lethal aid to Russia, adding to Iran's supply of military hardware. The conflict has sparked a US proxy war, with Russia, Iran, China, and North Korea on one side, and the US, NATO, and Ukraine on the other.

@kylenabecker - Kyle Becker

This just in: Russian state TV airs journalist's report that the U.S. has' declared war on Russia' following reports of the White House's approval of targeted strikes on Crimea.

@kylenabecker - Kyle Becker

Military developments represent an escalation of the War in Ukraine. The Russian navy has placed its nuclear submarines on a 'high-state of combat readiness' and will be conducting naval exercises in the Baltic Sea amid Biden's visit to Eastern Europe.

@kylenabecker - Kyle Becker

Meanwhile, the Chinese are poised to send Russia 'lethal aid' for its military campaign. This would add to Iran's supply of military hardware, such as drones, for the conflict. NATO has sparked a U.S. proxy war that threatens to bring into alignment all the nuclear powers on…

@kylenabecker - Kyle Becker

On one side: Russia, Iran, China, and North Korea. On the other side: the United States, NATO and Ukraine. All over a corrupt, non-democratic, non-member of NATO. It makes no sense from a national security standpoint.

Saved - August 22, 2024 at 8:06 AM

@ricwe123 - Richard

The Russians had been promised, no NATO enlargement. The NATO border has now moved 1000 km to the East. That is not without consequences.... https://t.co/wKJ7J1Q9ms

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 argues that the presence of the Russian army near NATO's border is a result of NATO's eastward expansion, not Russian aggression. Speaker 1 acknowledges NATO's expansion but denies it's a hostile move, asserting NATO is a defensive alliance. Speaker 0 suggests Russia perceives NATO's expansion as a threat, especially given troop deployments in Ukraine and Georgia. Speaker 1 states he cannot know Putin's thoughts, but reiterates NATO's defensive nature. Speaker 0 emphasizes NATO's eastward movement, while Speaker 1 denies blaming Russia for being close to NATO, but blames them for violating Ukraine's territorial integrity. Speaker 0 points out Ukraine is not a NATO member. Speaker 1 says other countries feel threatened.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: To look at this and say the reason that the Russian army is on NATO the Russian army is at NATO's doorstep is because NATO has expanded rather than the Russians expanding. That in other words, NATO has moved closer to Russia rather than Russia moving closer to NATO. Is that not an accurate way to look at this? Speaker 1: I think that's the way President Putin probably looks at it. It's Speaker 0: certainly not Speaker 1: the way that we look at it. Speaker 0: You don't you don't think that NATO has expanded eastward toward Russia? Speaker 1: NATO has expanded. And and the expansion has been a good thing for Speaker 0: So the reason that the Russian army is at NATO's doorstep is not the fault of the Russian army, not the it's not the Russian army that's done it. It's NATO has moved closer to move Speaker 1: Are you sure it wasn't NATO who was ordering, you know, upwards of 15 battalion tactical groups to within 10 kilometers of the border with Ukraine. And I'm pretty sure it wasn't NATO who put little green men inside Ukraine to destabilize eastern states. Speaker 0: Sure that Ukraine is not a member of NATO. So unless that's changed It's not it's not changed. Speaker 1: But I'm pretty sure the movement by Russia is Speaker 0: As NATO has if NATO has moved east, the reason that the Russian army is closer or on NATO's doorstep is because NATO moved, not because Speaker 1: NATO is not an an anti Russia alliance. NATO is a security Speaker 0: alliance. For 50 years, it was an anti Soviet alliance. So do you not understand it, Togo? Do you not understand how or can you not even see how the Russians would perceive it as a as a threat? And the fact that it keeps getting closer to their border while their troops I mean, the the places where their troops are, you say their troops are and may may have been in Ukraine and Georgia are not made of them. Speaker 1: I don't have I'm not gonna pretend to know what goes in President Putin's mind or Russian military commanders. I mean, I barely got a history degree at the University of South Florida. What I can tell you what I can tell you is that is that, NATO is a defensive alliance. It remains a defensive alliance. Speaker 0: Fair enough. But it has moved east. Correct? I mean, that's just a fact. Speaker 1: It has expanded. Speaker 0: Absolutely. Exactly. But Speaker 1: there's no reason for anybody to think the expansion is a hostile or threatening move. And we've been saying that throughout the last 15 years, Matt. Speaker 0: You're you're you're moving closer to Russia. You're blaming the Russians for being close to NATO. No. No. Speaker 1: No. No. Speaker 0: That's that's exactly what hate goes on. Speaker 1: Blaming the Russians for violating the territorial integrity of Ukraine and destabilizing the security of Ukraine. Speaker 0: Which is not a NATO. Which is not a NATO. Speaker 1: I I I see Other countries feel threatened.
Saved - August 17, 2023 at 3:17 PM

@MedvedevRussiaE - Dmitry Medvedev

Based on the proof of western countries’ complicity in blowing up the Nord Stream pipelines, we have none, not even moral limitations left to refrain from destroying our enemies’ undersea communications cables

Saved - July 13, 2023 at 2:08 AM

@TheRedactedInc - Redacted

Zelensky alleges #Russia may attack #Zaporizhzhia nuclear plant, currently under their control. Russia's been urging @iaeaorg for inspection. Is this a potential Ukraine false flag following a failed counteroffensive? Ukraine's Chernobyl history makes one pause.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The video discusses the threat of nuclear war between Ukraine and Russia. Ukraine claims that Russia is planning to blow up the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant, which Russia has controlled for over a year. Ukraine also expresses a desire to join NATO. The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has been investigating the situation but has been unable to determine who is responsible for the attacks on the power plant. The conflict between Ukraine and Russia continues, with Ukraine failing to make significant progress in its counteroffensive. The video raises concerns about the possibility of a nuclear explosion and the potential consequences for Europe. The speaker emphasizes the need for peace talks and an end to the violence.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It is time to talk about whether or not we will be here on Friday, collectively, if we have nuclear war heading our way because we are back to a major threat of nuclear war now with Ukraine saying that Russia is about to blow up the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant. They have controlled this plant for over a year now, why would they control a plant blow up a plant in their own control? This is the question we've been asking for months. Why would they sabotage this nuclear power plant? Now here is Zelensky saying on Twitter today that he well, he started out by thanking everyone for the weapons that they've all then sending from the west. He also says he really, really wants Ukraine to be in NATO and that for this to happen when they all meet next week, like, Hey, guys. Don't forget about me. Really want in. It's important. And he's also saying that they have information from their intelligence that the Russian military has placed objects resembling explosives on the roof of several power units in the Zaporizhian nuclear power plant, perhaps to simulate an attack on the plant plant. Perhaps they have some other scenario, he says. But in either case, the world sees, can't but see. This was translated from Ukrainian. I don't feel it. I don't understand that translation, but we'll we'll give it to the translation software. The only source of danger to the Zaporizhzhia nuclear plant is Russia and no one else. So the Kremlin responded by saying that this threat is actually from Kyiv and not from Russia, again, reminding us that They have been in control of this power plant for over a year. They have ratcheted the power down. I think they've turned out off into safe mode. We don't just turn them off. That's not how it works, but turned down into safe mode 5 of the 6 reactors, and kept them ready for the winter when they need to bring them back online. Again, it's worth reminding us that the Kremlin has been asking the International Atomic Agency, the IAEA, to investigate Zaporizhzhia since last summer because Ukraine has been shelling this plant for nearly a year now. When they did this, do you remember these images from September? These inspectors arrived in Kyiv, last September from the IAEA, and they were making their way to Zaporizhzhia power plant, and they were held up by the Ukrainian military for 3 hours blocking their access. When they finally did get through, they kinda just did some filming of themselves looking around with clipboards nodding. And then they said, okay. Yeah. We got it. Here is IAEA director general Rafael Grossi. Speaker 1: We are finishing our long awaited visit to the Sabrina nuclear power plant. I have just completed A first tour of the key areas that we wanted to see in this first approach, to the whole facility. Of course, there is a lot more to do. My team is staying on. And more importantly and most importantly, we are establishing a continued presence by the from the IEA, here. Speaker 0: Now after this, Grossi went on CNN and said, yes. People are hitting it. It's dangerous. There's been shelling. We don't know who's doing it. It's happening. We think it should stop, but we've got people there kinda waiting around to secure the plant. So if they don't know who's doing it, they won't blame and on anybody, but they're gonna to leave people there to possibly be shelled. It was a very bizarre, occurrence, and and no help at all. Watch him telling CNN, yeah. We're not sure. Speaker 2: So when you say people are hitting, can you make a determination as to who is hitting? Speaker 1: I cannot make that determination. We don't have the means to do that. There we as you know, you you would need to be looking or monitoring the the military operation in the region in all its its vastness, which is not only beyond the mandate of the IAE, but would require enormous capabilities. What we know, and that is my responsibility, is to look At the safety and the security of the facility to determine what is really going on. And this is why My visit there, the inspection there, and the fact that now I have people who have stayed there. So the IAEA is staying at the plant, was essential, indispensable. Then Speaker 0: Okay. So he wants to determine what's really going on, but he cannot determine what's really going on is what he said there, which was super helpful. You know, Russia even showed them shells and said, we don't make these. These come from the west. Here's what's hitting the plant. We don't know. We don't see that. We don't know where it's coming from. This was back in September. Russia said at the time, this was not a serious report. And now just today, the IAEA, because they just told us. They left people there. They should know what's going on. Right? They they've had eyes and boots on the ground, IAEA boots on the ground since September of 2022. Well, here's their statement for today. They said, you know, we've basically basically, what it says is we've been looking around a lot. We know of this nuclear threat. We've walked around there, and we've walked around there, and we know this thing about building 5, and we're just we know it's a thing, and we're walking around and looking. Again. So helpful. Now no one in the West has pushed for more inspections then. No one in the West is pushing for more explanation now. They're not going to the IAEA and say, hey. We've got some major rhetoric around nuclear fallout because if something happens, If Zaporizhia blows up and the west is able to blame it on Russia, they have justification for then firing their own nuclear arsenals. What Russia will return, it's all hell for all of us, literally. Again, this is not a scenario that benefits anyone, but Ukraine sort of needs it as a threat to step up because the west's attention on Ukraine is what is being called here by Politico, Western war fatigue. We're just you know, I guess, we're kind of tired of it. We want something a bit more sexy. Like, and we have a new round of, I don't know, razor blades and Halloween candy. That's what Americans do. We need to be constantly stim stimulated. That's sort of what they think of us. Not only would a nuclear explosion kind of, yeah, reinvigorate the US to stay involved, but it would also spread a cloud of radioactive material throughout all of Europe. So is this a false flag, or would they do it. This is the question du jour. It's a major question. None of us can actually answer it. None of us want to be asking this question. We shouldn't have to, for a couple of reasons that I'm gonna show you the map again that this conflict can end with borders as they are right now, and no one need die any further. Right now, Alexei Danilov, today, Ukraine's secretary of the National Security and Defense Council, He said this today on Twitter. He says that Ukraine's task is no longer to retake land, but instead just accomplish the maximum destruction of manpower, equipment, fuel depots, military vehicles, command posts, artillery, and air defense forces of the Russian army. He says this has been fruitful recently. Now the war of destruction is equal to the war of kilometers. The reason he's saying this is because they have gained so few kilometers in this major countermeasure that we were waiting on. Here's a map today. Now that he's talking about kilometers, let's take a look. This is from the Financial Times published this war about the status of the counteroffensive. Now the yellow, you probably can't even see that on your green, because it's so tiny, so I circled it here for you in blue. The yellow is what the u Ukrainian claimed counteroffensive. It's not even 1% of the land. Now let's just go over what we're looking at. Again, it says Crimea is contested. Crimea doesn't that way. They voted to become Russia, 95% or more in some regions, but, okay, Russia considers Crimea Russia. The red areas is the Donbas, which has been bombed and shelled since 2014, since the Maidan coup, because those places did not want to support the Maidan coup and actually supported Russian alliance. A lot of them are ethnic Russians, and they've been terrorized by Ukraine for nearly 10 years now. They asked Russia to intervene. Russia did just last year in March of 2022. Russia now holds that red line. That, the the sort of lighter black line that you see to the left of where the red ends. That is where the Donbas ends. This is where those are people who have voted to become Russia and are hoping that Russian troops continue forward, but that is also the area that Ukraine still considers there theirs. Now, obviously, if in thousands of deaths and we're gonna say, how long would we say this counter counteroffensive has been going on? 3 or 4 weeks? They haven't even pushed back even a tiny bit. They're not gonna push that red back. They're not going to. Speaker 3: And as Scott Ritter pointed out, they've not even broken one single line of defense yet. Like, they're not even to Russia's, quote, unquote, wall of defense. Speaker 0: Yes. Yeah. Yeah. I mean, that territory they've got, have has been kind of, like, just, you know, blowing stuff up and moving themselves forward, but it's not been, man to man combat in those areas. And so, again, if we let's look at the map as the map that we just showed you was a western map. It aligns with the map that's being shown inside Russian media. This is from RIA, the major media outlet. They show about the same thing, but what's missing from the western map that we didn't just see are those blue dots that are above the contested region. What those blue dots there are Ukrainian forces. Why are they there, do you think? They're telling us it's a counteroffensive, meaning they'd be countering what has been taken over by Russia, which is the red contested parts. Why are they up there countering nothing, do you think? Any guesses? Could it be because they're afraid of attacking Russian lines, they don't feel equipped. They don't want Speaker 3: to do not defense. Maybe it's offense. Speaker 0: You know? Like not defense. Speaker 3: Yeah. Yes. Speaker 1: Clearly. Speaker 0: Yeah. And, you know, what they're doing there is well, today, Russia said that, 5 drones were downed inside of Moscow. So are they there in active combat? Are they there doing these sort of remote attacks, it's it's unclear. You know, the way that Ukrainian forces moved into Crimea when Crimea voted to become a part of Russia was that they were not actually able to break into Russian defenses once because the way that that happened. The Maidan coup happened. People from Crimea had gone to support the Russian side, to support, not becoming a western alliance, a western allied government, and the toppling of the former government. And they were attacked by pro Ukrainian forces and Ukrainian military on command on the command of the new Western aligned government, and they were chased back to Crimea. What Crimea did was build fortress around their land, go to their parliament and said, we wanna vote to annex ourselves from Ukraine. They had no idea that Russia was gonna come in and help them, and they fortified their lines with shovels because they knew that Ukrainian military was coming in to attack them. And so because they were successful in fortifying their lands, and they were rescued by Russian forces that were already stationed there, they did not get attacked like the rest of the Donbas. And so those forces kind of turned their themselves on the Donbas, and the Donbas has been suffering ever since. But what happened was Ukraine had some soldiers already stationed in in Crimea. They had some people already stationed in the sea there. They were able to They were trying to sabotage. They were able to, like, get weapons into certain caves. They were trying to poison water wells. They were doing all of these things that they could do in mall measure as resistance to what was supported Russian territory. I think that it sounds like what we're like, that seems like why those blue dots can we put that map back on? It it would seem that's why those blue dots are outside of the forces because most of the time, they don't wanna go head to head with the Russian army, and you can't blame them. Speaker 3: And that's everything that they've done would be against civilians, you know, not soldiers. So and, also, it's like I was just thinking, this is kinda like so I play pool on a pool league, and you have level 7 pool players And you have level pool 2 pool players, and they're, like, way different. And it's like Russia has all these high level soldiers, and and you've got people that are being dragged out of their homes that don't wanna fight that probably have no idea here. On on the Ukrainian side. So you you've got, like, these, you know, well trained soldiers against just common people, and so, of course, they're gonna take the lesser, you you know, where their life is not more at risk, like poisoning water and sneaking in and doing these surprise attacks in the in the civilian areas rather than confronting these soldiers. Speaker 0: Yes. And, you know, the we're starting to get some Western media admitting that Ukrainian soldiers are afraid. They're untrained for this. They should not be thrown up against this line that Russia is gonna hold now. Now if you watch you know, if you if you read about the annexation of Crimea and how these people terrified of the Ukrainian army, and they knew that they had held the line, but the Donbas had not. Part of the question becomes, Why has the Donbas been suffering all of this time? Why why did it take Russia so long to come and put a stop to this? But now that they're there, They're holding a line, and these civilians are saying, okay. Good. We will no longer then be shelled by the Ukrainian Ukrainian military, which the west knew Ukraine has been spending $8,000,000 a day to attack the Donbas and was borrowing it from the International Monetary Fund. So it's not like this is a surprise to those of us in the west. We know we've known this. The question is, Who feels motivated to run up against this line now that it's it seems to hold? Who wants to who wants to give their their lives for this, and those people are just they're simply not trained for this. So I think that what we're seeing is that Ukraine knows they cannot take this land back if we could just leave the map up. I just feel like it's important for us to just Study this map and realize what's at stake here. The west is not gonna move that red back. They're not, any more than they're gonna move that Crimea, to that color even though Crimea is Russia. They're not going to. And so now is as good a time as ever for peace talks, those people voted to become Russia. Most of them are ethnic Russians. They want this to be left alone, and let the soldiers who don't wanna fight and don't have fighting, just go home. Just let them stop dying, because this is a you know? Otherwise, if it's just to get our attention with nuclear war, you have our attention. We want peace, and we want it right now. So let me know, what you think of this in the chat. If you feel like Nuclear war is something we will wake up to tomorrow or if you think that this will somehow get ratcheted down. I I posted about this on Twitter, in someone that said, oh, no. The neocons would never let this happen because then it's over too fast. Like, they like to drag it out for profit. And I was like, is that an optimistic way to think about it, or is it pessimistic? At this point, what's preferable? Is a long, drawn out war or just to nuke us all? I don't know. Speaker 4: Thank you so much for watching this segment here at Redacted. We are live every day at 4 PM EST, trying to share the stories that the mainstream media will not cover. You should also So come over and join our community of redacted rebels over at redacted.inc. That's our private locals community where we can share content that we simply cannot share here on YouTube. Come over and join the rebellion together right now by going to redacted dot inc. We'll see you next time.
Saved - March 2, 2024 at 10:44 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
German military officials allegedly planned an attack on Russia's Crimea bridge for its strategic and political impact, while emphasizing non-direct involvement. The motive appears to be both military-strategic and political, raising questions about the potential implications of such an act.

@MarioNawfal - Mario Nawfal

🇩🇪 Germany Planned a Crimea Attack German military officials reportedly planned to attack Russia's Crimea bridge, aiming for strategic and political impact, stressing non-direct involvement. "The target is not only of military-strategic importance, but also political good. We can't be seen as directly involved." How would this not be an act of war? Source: @BRICSinfo

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 1 discusses the challenges of targeting a bridge due to its size, potentially requiring multiple missiles. Speaker 2 emphasizes the need for centralized mission planning data. Speaker 3 raises concerns about involvement in the mission and suggests different training approaches. The group debates the implications of political decisions on mission planning and the complexity of training for such operations. Ultimately, they consider the limitations and possibilities of their capabilities in carrying out the mission effectively. Translation (if needed): The speakers discuss targeting a bridge, centralized mission planning data, training approaches, political implications, and the capabilities of carrying out the mission effectively.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Ich kann Speaker 1: noch mal schnell ergänzen wegen der Brücke, weil wir die uns intensiv angeguckt haben und die Brücke ist leider aufgrund ihrer Größe wie 'n Flugplatz. Das heißt, es kann durchaus sein, dass ich dafür zehn oder zwanzig Flugkörper brauche. Speaker 2: Das ist alles geschätzt, wenn es da wo's aufklappt, wenn er die Pfeiler nimmt. Speaker 1: Ja, und jetzt wär der Pfeiler, da machen wir unter Umständen nur 'n Loch rein und dann stehen wir da. Speaker 0: Ja, ja. So, ich sag mal, Speaker 1: da eine valide Aussage zu haben, müssten wir's wirklich selber mal Speaker 2: Nee, ist wahr. Ich wollt auch nicht die Brücke wippennieren. Ich will nur sagen, dass der pragmatisch Ansatz. Was wollen die Worte? Speaker 0: Ja, aber Genau. Speaker 2: Gehen die das hin und wie schnell könnt ich die dafür ausbilden? Und am Ende Speaker 0: Ah ja, absolut. Speaker 2: Zwei Punkt. Was bleibt, ist, dass wir denen die image zentralisierten Missionsplanungsdaten geben müssen. Wir müssen denen grundsätzlich die Samo Bee geben, wenn sie sie nicht selber haben. Und die Tagesdaten, die haben wir ja, aber das müsste man denen auch irgendwie zur Verfügung stellen. Weil wenn's so kleine Ziele geht, dann muss der halt 'n bissel genauer ausgeplant werden als nur aufm Satz Picture. Wenn's auf gehärtete Ziele geht, dann ist das fair wie easy und relativ schnell geplant, wenn man vor allem dann explodieren, dass der in zweistelliger Foodhöhe fliegen kann. Speaker 0: Oh je, und ich meiner Facebook, ja? Das fängt jetzt ja schon ganz gut auf dem Punkt. Wir alle wissen ja, dass Sie die Brücke, dass sie die Brücke rausnehmen wollen. Ja, das ist klar. 'N bisschen auch, was das am Ende bedeutet, ne. Wenn wenn dann dann hast Du, dann ist die Versorgung dieser so wichtig nicht nur nicht nur militärisch, strategisch wichtigen, auch son bisschen politisch ist die ist die gute Insel da ja ihr Herzstück. Jetzt nicht mehr ganz so ganz so fatal, wo sie ja quasi ihre Landdrücke mehr oder weniger dahin haben. Aber und und da hat man eben Angst, wenn da die direkte Link der Streitkräfte in die Ukraine geht. Und da wär halt dann immer die Frage, kann man im Grunde genommen den Trick pullllen, dass man dass man unsere Leute abstellt zur MBDA, dass nur eine direct Klein zwischen MBDA und der Ukraine ist. Dann ist es weniger schlimm, wie wenn wenn die direct Klein unserer Luftwaffe zu ihnen ist, ja. Ich glaub, Speaker 3: das macht keinen Unterschied, Ingo. Also wir müssen halt aufpassen, dass wir nicht gleich zu Beginn ins Kriterium formulieren. Und ich mein, wenn wir dem Minister jetzt sagen, ich überspitze mal 'n bisschen, wir planen die Daten und fahren die dann von Polen aus vom Auto rüber, damit keiner mitkriegt. Das ist 'n Killkriterium. Speaker 0: Ja, Speaker 3: ja, ja. Also wir werden es nicht schaffen, dass wir mit einer irgendwie gearteten Beteiligung von uns das Ganze umsetzen. Auch es macht Also erst mal in dem, wenn wenn das von der Firma kommt, müsst ihr erst mal die MBDA dem Ganzen zustimmen, ob Speaker 0: die das machen würden. Ja, Speaker 3: aber dann macht das auch keinen Unterschied, ob wir unsere Leute in Büschelers planen lassen oder oder in Schrobenhausen. Beteiligt ist beteiligt. Und ich glaube, über die Hürde werden man nicht rüberkommen. Speaker 0: Ja, okay. Und dann jetzt noch mal Speaker 3: auf die auf die, wenn man das mal als rote Linie, als Grundlage voraussetzen, als Dauer-up macht auf Zurück, was ich dann am Anfang meinte. Entweder wir müssen die Ausbildung aufteilen, dass wir sagen, wir machen einen Fast Track und einen Long Track und in dem Long Track, dann sind die halt da vier Monate und lernen es komplett richtig mit wie mach ich's mit 'ner Brücke? Und in dem Fast Trick geht es erst mal den schnellen Einsatz nach zwei Wochen, wie weiß ich, was ich mit dem Munitionsdipro mache? Oder die andere Option, wir fragen, ob in dieser Phase, bis die selber komplett komplett ausgebildet sind, fragen wir die Dritten, ob's in der Phase übernehmen. Aber ich glaube, eine irgendwie geartete Versuch einer Zwischenlösung, stell Speaker 0: dir mal vor, das kommt Speaker 3: an die Presse. Wir haben unseren Leute in Schrobenhausen oder wir Speaker 0: man sagt, also wenn der politische Wille jetzt mal da ist, dann müssen wir erst mal sagen, so, da, wir wollen mal einer aus der Ukraine hier hinkommen. Ja. Und dann müssen wir mal wissen, ist der ist die politische Vorgabe keinerlei direkte Beteiligung mehr an der Missionsplanung, dann muss klar sein, die Ausbildung dauert schon etwas länger. Und die Komplexität und auch am Ende der Einsatz erfolgt nimmt natürlich ab, aber ist auch nicht unmöglich. Weil ist ja nicht so, dass Sie jetzt nicht schon eine gewisse Erfahrung darin gesammelt haben und wir sehen ja selber, was wir gerade sonst alles für Hightech Ja. Zeug einsetzen. Und und und dann müsste man sehen, wenn wenn's die Vorgabe ist, es gibt ja keine direkte Beteiligung, wir können nicht die Missionsplanung in Brüssel machen und sie rüberschicken. Da könnt ich mir fast vorstellen, dass das für Deutschland eine rote Linie ist. Ja, da muss halt klar sein, man muss jetzt was länger ausbilden, dann geht's halt 'n paar Monate. Und man kann auch nicht alles damit machen. Aber ist nicht so, dass man sagt, man kann nichts damit machen. Und man kann dann eher da
Saved - June 17, 2024 at 8:55 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The recent recording of German officers discussing an assault on Russia's Kerch Strait Bridge follows Berlin's admission of British involvement in attacks on Russia. This escalation may cause Russia to consider both the German and British militaries as legitimate targets. #Ukraine #Russia #Putin #UkraineRussianWar

@ricwe123 - Richard

The recording of German officers discussing an assault on Russia's Kerch Strait Bridge comes right after Berlin's disclosure of British involvement in attacks on Russia. This dramatic escalation is likely to lead Russia to view both the German and British militaries as legitimate targets.... #Ukraine️ #Russia #Putin #UkraineRussianWar #UkraineRussiaWar #UkraineWar #Ukrainekrieg

Video Transcript AI Summary
Wir diskutieren die Brücke und die Bedeutung für die Ukraine. Es ist wichtig, die Emissionsplanungsdaten zentralisiert zu halten. Es gibt Bedenken bezüglich direkter Beteiligung an der Missionsplanung. Die Ausbildung dauert länger, aber es ist nicht unmöglich. Deutschland könnte eine rote Linie ziehen, wenn es um direkte Beteiligung geht. Es ist entscheidend, die politischen Vorgaben zu beachten und die Komplexität des Einsatzes zu berücksichtigen. Translation: We discuss the bridge and its significance for Ukraine. It is crucial to keep emission planning data centralized. There are concerns about direct involvement in mission planning. Training takes longer, but it is not impossible. Germany could draw a red line when it comes to direct involvement. It is essential to adhere to political guidelines and consider the complexity of the operation.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Ich kenne nochmals schnell ergänzen wegen Speaker 1: der Brücke, weil wir uns intensiv angeguckt haben und die Brücke ist leider aufgrund ihrer Größe. Wie ein Flugplatz. Das heisst, es kann durchaus sein, dass ich dafuer zehn oder zwanzig Flugkörper brauche. Da mal wieder Aussage zu haben, müssten wir es wirklich selber mal. Speaker 2: Ich will euch nicht die Brücke wippenieren. Ich will nur sagen, das pas the pack Marisch anders, was wollen die Woche? Und wie schnell könnte ich die dafür ausbilden? Am Ende bleibt es, dass wir die image zentralisierten Emissionsplanungsdaten geben müssen. Wir müssen denen grundsätzlich die Semovie geben, wenn sie sie nicht selber haben. Und die Tagesdaten, die haben wir ja, aber das müsste man denen auch zur Verfügung stellen. Wenn es kleine Ziele geht, muss der genauer geplant werden als nur auf dem SatzPitcher. Wenn es auf gehärte Ziele geht, ist das per se und relativ schnell geplant. Wenn aber vor allem das Exploit, dass der in zweistellige Fusshöhe fliegen kann. Speaker 0: Ja. Das geht jetzt ja schon ganz gut auf den Punkt. Wir alle wissen ja, dass sie die Brücke rausnehmen wollen. Das ist klar. Nicht mehr auch, was das am Ende bedeutet. Du, es ist wirklich die Versorgung dieser so wichtig, nicht nur militärisch strategisch wichtigen, auch so ein bisschen politisch ist die gute Insel da ja, ihr Herzstück. Jetzt nicht mehr ganz so fatal, wo sie ja quasi ihre Landbrücke mehr oder weniger dahin haben. Und da hat man eben Angst, wenn da die direkte Links der Streitkräfte in die Ukraine geht. Und da wäre halt dann immer die Frage, Kann man im Grunde genommen den Trick pulen, dass man unsere Leute abstellt zu MBDA, das nur eine Direct Klein zwischen NBDA und der Ukraine ist. Dann ist es weniger schlimm, wie wenn die Direct Klein unserer Lofappe zu ihnen ist. Ich glaube, das macht keinen Unterschied. Wir müssen aufpassen, dass wir nicht gleich zu Beginn im Zielkriterien formulieren. Und ich meine, wenn wir dem Minister jetzt sagen, Ich überspitze mal ein bisschen, wir planen die Daten und fahren die dann von Polen aus dem Auto rüber, damit keiner mitkriegt kriegt. Das ist ein Kriterium. Wir werden es nicht schaffen, dass wir mit einer irgendwie gearteten Beteiligung von uns das Ganze umsetzen. Also erst mal, wenn das von der Firma kommt, muesste erst mal die MWDA den ganzen zustimmen, ob sie das machen wollen. Ja, aber dann macht es auch keinen Unterschied, ob wir unsere Leute im Büchelplatz planen lassen oder in Schromhausen beteiligt ist beteiligt und ich glaube, über die Hürde werden man nicht rüber kommen. Noch mal auf die auf die, also das mal als rote Linie, als Grundlage vor Ort setzen, als dauert doch mal drauf was ich dann am Anfang meinte, entweder die Ausbildung aufteilen, dass wir sagen, wir machen einen Farb- und einen Long track und im Long track, Dann sind die halt ab vier Monate und lernen es komplett richtig mit, wie mache ich es mit einer Brücke. Und in einem Fast Track geht es erst mal den schnellen Einsatz. Nach zwei Wochen, wie weiss ich, was ich mit dem Emissionsmikroro mache. Oder die andere Option, wir fragen, ob in dieser Phase, bis die Server komplett komplett ausgebildet sind, fragen wir die Dritten, ob sie in der Phase übernehmen. Aber ich glaube, eine geartete Versuch einer frischen Lösung, stell vor, das kommt an die Presse. Wir haben unseren Leute in Schrobenhausen oder wir fahren irgendwie mit dem Auto gespulen, sind, glaube ich, beides keine akzeptablen Man kann es natürlich so ziehen, dass man sagt: Also wenn der politische Wille jetzt mal da ist, dann müsste man ja erst mal sagen, sag mal einer aus der Ukraine hierhin kommen. Und da müsste man wissen: Ist die politische Vorgabe keinerlei direkte Beteiligung mehr an der Missionsplanung? Dann muss klar sein: Die Ausbildung dauert schon etwas länger. Und die Komplexität, und auch am Ende der Einsatz erfolgt, nimmt natürlich ab. Aber es ist auch nicht unmöglich. Es ist ja nicht so, dass wir jetzt nicht schon eine gewisse Erfahrung darin gesammelt haben. Wir sehen ja selber, was wir gerade sonst alles für Hightech Zeug einsetzen. Und dann müsste man sehen. Wenn es die Vorgabe ist, es gibt ja keine direkte Betreuung. Wir können nicht die Missionsplanung in Büchlein machen und sie rüberschicken. Da könnte ich mir fast vorstellen, dass das für Deutschland eine rote Linie ist. Ja, da muss halt klar sein, man muss ja etwas länger ausbilden. Da gibt es halt ja ein paar Monate. Man kann auch nicht alles damit machen. Aber es ist nicht so, dass man sagt, man kann nichts damit machen.
Saved - December 30, 2024 at 3:36 AM

@ExxAlerts - E X X ➠A L E R T S

ALERT: 🚨 Finnish special forces board and confiscated the ship after it destroyed 4 undersea power & telecommunication cables

@visegrad24 - Visegrád 24

Finnish police confirm that they have found a trail nearly 100 km long on the seabed from the anchor of the Russian shadow fleet vessel "Eagle S" Finnish special forces boarded and confiscated the ship after it destroyed 4 undersea power cables & telecommunication cables 🇫🇮🇷🇺 https://t.co/WGDtja93YY

Saved - February 14, 2025 at 2:44 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
European leaders are in a state of panic following a call between Trump and Putin, where they discussed a peaceful resolution to the Ukraine crisis. The unexpected nature of this dialogue has left Europe feeling blindsided and concerned about the implications for the region.

@SputnikInt - Sputnik

🚨EUROPE IN PANIC MODE: CUT OUT & BLINDSIDED BY TRUMP-PUTIN CALL After the leaders of Russia and the US discussed a peaceful resolution to the Ukraine crisis, a panicky reaction from European leaders was not long in coming 🧵1/9 https://t.co/7ilOxZs2WB

@SputnikInt - Sputnik

🧵2/9 https://t.co/80i0wQluMn

@SputnikInt - Sputnik

🧵3/9 https://t.co/XGG5zF4hQW

@SputnikInt - Sputnik

🧵4/9 https://t.co/0Is7VqiZBl

@SputnikInt - Sputnik

🧵5/9 https://t.co/b3lMPwUPu8

@SputnikInt - Sputnik

🧵6/9 https://t.co/vZPl1lVthA

@SputnikInt - Sputnik

🧵7/9 https://t.co/xo7ghrnDeZ

@SputnikInt - Sputnik

🧵8/9 https://t.co/IYEtSIahaA

@SputnikInt - Sputnik

🧵9/9 https://t.co/jDVFrgVIJB

Saved - March 4, 2025 at 8:50 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Healthy relationships require mutual respect, which I feel is lacking between Ukraine, Europe, and us. America has no obligation to protect Ukraine, and I question why we should continue to invest in Europe. The elites pushing for an endless war in Ukraine seem disconnected from the needs of the American people. I've noticed a shift in European attitudes, with some media beginning to recognize the reality of the situation. However, I believe many leaders, including Zelenskyy, have made serious miscalculations and remain out of touch with American sentiments.

@shellenberger - Michael Shellenberger

Healthy relationships depend on mutual respect. Ukraine and Europe don't respect us; they look down on us. America never had any obligation to protect Ukraine. And now we're asking why we should continue to spend our money, and put our lives on the line, to protect Europe. https://t.co/XgdfDogPfO

Video Transcript AI Summary
I love Europe, but Europeans don't respect Americans, creating an unsustainable relationship. It's been 80 years since we bailed you out. We're dealing with fentanyl, education issues, veteran care, and endless Middle East conflicts. Ukraine isn't in NATO, yet we're seemingly obligated to protect them, even though Americans don't want another war. Both the left and right agree. European leaders and Zelensky's recent behavior suggest the relationship is over. We'll still trade and visit, but the entitlement and disrespect are too much. You enjoy universal healthcare, shorter workweeks, and early retirement, largely because we fund your security. This relationship needs to change. The anger displayed by Trump and Vance towards Zelensky reflects a broader sentiment: we won't be treated like this by those we help. It's time for a change.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There's something I need to say and I need to be blunt. So let me start by saying, I love Europe. Truly love Europe. I love visiting Europe. I love Europeans. I have European friends. I respect the relationship we've had for a really long time. You Europeans do not respect Americans. I you can protest and say, no no, we love America. No, you don't. We know you look down on us. You think you're better than us. And in some ways you are. You know, you work thirty five hours a week. You have longer vacations. You've got this magnificent culture. We get it. But any relationship in which one side doesn't respect the other can't last. If this thing where Ukraine comes to the White House and acts like it can tell us what we should do, that's not what the relationship is. This thing where somehow we're on the hook, including for countries that are not in NATO, that was never the deal. Ukraine is not part of NATO. We were never obligated to to protect Ukraine. Maybe that was something that Europe wants to do. That great. Go Europe should go protect Ukraine. We have no NATO agreement with Ukraine. And this thing where then Zelenskyy then goes and, like, quotes all these other European leaders, they're with me, not with The United States. Great. Go go go work together. Like, we we have a hundred thousand Americans being killed by the Chinese Mexican fentanyl and methamphetamine mafias every year. The our kids are not learning to read. We have thousands of veterans with PTSD and are hurting. We have been at war in The Middle East for a quarter century. It's been eighty years since we bailed out Europe. You have your own militaries. You have your own nuclear weapons. I've been trying to be really indirect about this for years. I've been trying to be soft pedaling that you guys don't get it. Europeans do not get it. You guys think that this relationship is going to last forever. You think that because something's written down on a piece of paper, it's going to last forever. Americans have voted against this multiple times. It doesn't this is not about what you think of Trump or like Trump. People on the left, on the right, they are they do not want to be in a nuclear war with Russia. How can we explain this to you? We do not wanna continue to be in the Ukraine war. We want peace. Our natural inclination is to actually not get involved in conflicts in Europe and in Europe and Asia. We didn't wanna have to continue to intervene after World War two. I get it. But times have changed. We're ready to move on. I know I we bear a lot of responsibility for this. The United States bears a lot of responsibility for this. Our people, our administrations, our think tanks told Zelensky that and told the Europeans that, you know, we were loyal to that alliance, that we were gonna stick with them. No. That's not that's not the American people are not on board with that. This is not again, the left has traditionally been against those kinds of military entanglements. Now the right is, but a lot of the left is too, a lot of Democrats, a lot of Liberals. I I would love an orderly transition here, but the behavior that we're seeing coming out of European leaders and out of Zelensky just now in the Oval Office suggests that the relationship is over. We'll reset the relationship afterwards. We're have a trade. We're gonna visit each other. It's great. But this thing of this entitlement, it it I don't think Europeans understand how angry it makes us. I don't think Europeans really understand how much Americans want to deal with our problems. We go to Europe, you have universal health care, you work thirty five hours a week, you retire at a young age, you don't work nearly as hard as we do in The United States, You have many more benefits in large part because we pay for all of your security or a large part of it. And in return, we just get disrespect, entitlements, like we're like your children and we're this is relationship. It needs to end. It needs to change. K? Maybe there's a transition period something, but this is gone too far. And I think that the anger that you saw in the White House with Trump and and and and Vance with Zelensky holding his arms, rolling his eyes, acting like he was telling us what the deal was, no. That that that that's not a Republican, Democrat, whatever thing. That is not how we're gonna be treated by people that we're helping. So it's time to grow up. It's just the the it's time for the relationship to change.

@shellenberger - Michael Shellenberger

https://t.co/901moqdCzX

@shellenberger - Michael Shellenberger

The elites who want to continue an endless war in Ukraine benefit directly from it and few of them care at all about the American people. https://t.co/vcldGb02x0

@shellenberger - Michael Shellenberger

Trump is abandoning Ukraine and threatening global peace, say his critics. He's not. He's negotiating an end to the war, & reducing the US role in Europe, which voters want. Elites are enraged because Trump's new, post-globalist order takes from them the power they badly abused. https://t.co/jYjYe8u467

@shellenberger - Michael Shellenberger

Anyone who has been to Europe knows Europeans look down on us. Many will admit it's true. They were grateful after WWII. Since then, they've become entitled & narcissistic. They live in a bubble. They don't care about us. No relationship without mutual respect can last.

@shellenberger - Michael Shellenberger

.@ZelenskyyUa has learned absolutely nothing. Just like Europe's leaders. https://t.co/TMghZA4etB

@shellenberger - Michael Shellenberger

Europeans are only now starting to understand what's happening. https://t.co/fxDuFVdiSf

@shellenberger - Michael Shellenberger

The UK media is waking up first. Eventually, the French will. Whatever the case, the relationship is ending. https://t.co/BRwLFkcNpZ

@shellenberger - Michael Shellenberger

"The Zelenskyy team made what turned out to be several miscalculations." Understatement of the decade. https://t.co/JgnIhSsavO

@shellenberger - Michael Shellenberger

The Ukraine news media, like Zelenskyy, is delusional. Europeans are apparently incapable of reading a poll. Europeans really, really do not care at all about Americans.

@shellenberger - Michael Shellenberger

https://t.co/S4OH9RgN4D

@shellenberger - Michael Shellenberger

They’re finally starting to get it https://t.co/2x0nImsg2m

Saved - March 1, 2025 at 11:49 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Norway's largest marine fuel company, Haltbakk Bunkers, has refused to sell diesel to the USS Delaware after President Zelensky's Oval Office meeting, marking a first for NATO members. The company criticized the US leadership, calling the meeting a "shitshow" and praised Zelensky for his composure. They announced an immediate halt to fuel provision for American forces in Norway and urged others to follow suit. It's important to note that Virginia-class submarines have auxiliary diesel engines for backup power in emergencies.

@amuse - @amuse

UKRAINE: Norway's largest marine fuel company refused to sell diesel to a US Navy Virginia-Class attack submarine after Zelensky's disastrous Oval Office meeting. While the fuel was only for the USS Delaware's backup diesel engine, this is the first time a NATO member refused a fellow NATO member fuel for a military vessel. It may be time for the US to exit NATO.

@amuse - @amuse

UKRAINE: The official social media statement by Haltbakk Bunkers statied: "We have today been witnesses to the biggest shitshow ever presented 'live on tv' by the current American president and his vice president. Huge credit to the president of Ukraine restraining himself and for keeping calm even though USA 🇺🇸 put on a backstabbing tv show. It made us sick. Short and sweet. As a result, we have decided to immediate STOP as fuel provider to American forces in Norway and their ships calling Norwegian ports.'No Fuel to Americans!'We encourage all Norwegians and Europeans to follow our example. SLAVA UKRAINA 🇺🇦"

@amuse - @amuse

UKRAINE: Just to be clear, Virginia-class attack submarines are equipped with an auxiliary diesel engine to provide backup power in emergency situations. This diesel generator can supply limited electrical power and propulsion if the nuclear reactor must be shut down or fails, ensuring the submarine can maintain critical systems and, if necessary, safely return to port. https://news.usni.org/2014/10/22/navsea-submarines-control-systems-risk-cyber-attack

NAVSEA: Submarines Control Systems are at Risk for Cyber Attack - USNI News This story has been updated from a previous post to amend comments made by Naval Sea Systems commander, Vice Adm. William Hilarides, based on new information provided to USNI News in an interview subsequent to this posting. The revised information can be found in brackets behind the original text. The head of Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) warned that the U.S. Navy will have to ramp up its cyber-security efforts to secure the controls systems of its submarines. “It is the threat to our control systems,” Vice Adm. William Hilarides, commander of NAVSEA, told an audience at the Naval Submarine League Symposium news.usni.org
Saved - March 2, 2025 at 12:26 AM

@shaunmmaguire - Shaun Maguire

This is a miscalculation by Norway of epic proportions These American submarines are patrolling Northern waters for European security Whatever one’s personal views are, it’s foolish to lose sight of the power dynamics

@amuse - @amuse

UKRAINE: Norway's largest marine fuel company refused to sell diesel to a US Navy Virginia-Class attack submarine after Zelensky's disastrous Oval Office meeting. While the fuel was only for the USS Delaware's backup diesel engine, this is the first time a NATO member refused a fellow NATO member fuel for a military vessel. It may be time for the US to exit NATO.

Saved - April 1, 2025 at 4:36 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Today, I explored several pressing stories. I examined Ukraine's intensified attacks on Russian energy infrastructure, questioning the implications for Zelensky's regime. I also considered Denmark's military commitments in Ukraine and its capacity to defend Greenland against potential threats. Additionally, I delved into the controversial role of USAID in Myanmar amidst political blame. The rising tensions between the US and Iran were highlighted, particularly Trump's warnings of military action. Lastly, I reflected on Marine Le Pen's conviction, suggesting it may signal the EU's anxiety over euroscepticism.

@SputnikInt - Sputnik

🧵 TOP 5 STORIES OF THE DAY: Le Pen’s Conviction, US-Iran Tensions and USAID’s Dirty Deeds What do Ukrainian strikes on Russia's energy infrastructure say about Zelensky's regime? Could Denmark defend Greenland if Trump decided to take it by force? Read on...👇 https://t.co/co5YKSFzlH

@SputnikInt - Sputnik

5. WHAT CEASEFIRE? ZELENSKY RAMPS UP ATTACKS ON RUSSIAN ENERGY FACILITIES Despite official statements, Ukraine has escalated attacks on Russia's energy infrastructure. Here’s the timeline of those breaches.👉https://goo.su/zhw4A https://t.co/EW7zuKImNt

@SputnikInt - Sputnik

4. DENMARK DRAINS DEFENSES ARMING UKRAINE, BUT CAN IT DEFEND GREENLAND? 🇩🇰💥 Denmark has led NATO’s proxy war on Russia in Ukraine, but how does that affect its ability to defend Greenland if Trump decides to take it? Here's the link between the two.👉https://goo.su/R46m https://t.co/qpzDkj5062

@SputnikInt - Sputnik

3. USAID IN MYANMAR: A LEGACY OF SOFT POWER MANIPULATION? 🇺🇸💰 Democrats blame Trump’s USAID cuts for Myanmar’s earthquake tragedy, despite his pledge of aid. But what was USAID really doing in Myanmar?👉https://goo.su/AdvU3w https://t.co/E5cyET3a1s

@SputnikInt - Sputnik

2. ARE US AND IRAN REALLY ON THE BRINK OF WAR? ⚔️ Trump warns of massive bombing if Iran doesn’t agree to a new nuclear deal. What’s pushing both sides closer to conflict, and how is Iran responding?👉https://goo.su/Czmf3wA https://t.co/8eW00NWdgv

@SputnikInt - Sputnik

1. LE PEN’S CONVICTION: A SYMBOL OF EU'S FEAR OF EUROSCEPTICS? 🇪🇺⚖️ Marine Le Pen’s conviction for embezzlement raises alarms about the EU’s fear of challengers to the status quo. Here’s the breakdown of why her trial may be more political than legal.👉https://goo.su/eu0Xn https://t.co/PnOZ96ZOaH

Saved - August 5, 2025 at 4:23 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I discussed the recent lifting of Russia's moratorium on deploying intermediate and shorter-range missiles, a response to perceived threats from US and NATO missile deployments near its borders. Despite Russia's diplomatic warnings, the West's actions have prompted this defensive measure. Key missile systems like the 9M729, Iskander-M, and RS-26 Rubezh are now eligible for deployment, enhancing Russia's strategic capabilities. Historically, the INF Treaty aimed to prevent an arms race, but the US's withdrawal in 2019 has led to this escalation. Russia seeks to restore balance amid ongoing tensions.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

🚨🇺🇸🇷🇺 Did Trump's crazy rant end INF moratorium? After years of restraint, Russia has now officially lifted the ban on the deployment of intermediate & shorter-range missiles. Moscow is compelled to respond to the direct threat posed by US missiles encircling its borders. 🧵 https://t.co/gVzZqycfyu

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

This decision comes after direct provocations by the US and NATO, who have: 🔸Exercises of mobile Mk70 launcher (Denmark, 2023) 🔸Deployed Typhon (mid-range) in Philippines/Australia (April 2024) 🔸Tested PrSM missiles (500+ km) via HIMARS in Palau/Ukraine (June 2024) 🔸Dark Eagle hypersonics in Talisman Sabre 2025 exercises (Australia) 🔸Deploying of Dark Eagle hypersonics in Germany (exercises planned for 2026)

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

Why Russia Acted: Moscow repeatedly warned against NATO’s missile expansions near its borders. The West ignored diplomatic efforts, forcing Russia to take necessary defensive measures to preserve strategic stability. https://t.co/w2zEjLAg4A

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

Key Russia’s missile arsenal are now eligible for deployment: 9M729 (SSC-8) – Ground-Launched Cruise Missile 🔸Range: ~2,500 km (adjustable) 🔸Payload: Nuclear or conventional (450 kg) 🔸Accuracy: <10m CEP (precision strike capable) 🔸Mobility: Road-mobile (hard to detect) 🔸Purpose: Counter NATO A2/AD systems, high-value targets

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

Iskander-M (9M723) - The Unstoppable Threat 🔸Type: Tactical ballistic missile 🔸Range: 500+ km (extendable to 700 km) 🔸Speed: Mach 6+ (hypersonic) 🔸Evasion: Terminal maneuvers 🔸Payload: Cluster/thermobaric/EMP 🔸Deployment: Western/Southern MDs https://t.co/FEaIYhMxj1

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

RS-26 Rubezh - The Strategic Game-Changer 🔸Type: ICBM/IRBM hybrid 🔸Range: 2,000-6,000 km (INF test ranges) 🔸Warheads: 3 MIRV (adjustable) 🔸Speed: Mach 10+ 🔸Advantage: Evades all current ABM systems 🔸Status: Combat-ready since 2020 https://t.co/JKjft8ALZn

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

Historical Context: The INF Treaty (1987) banned these weapons to prevent a European arms race. The US unilaterally withdrew in 2019, blaming Russia’s 9M729—while ignoring its own violations (e.g., Aegis Ashore in Romania). https://t.co/27TvfxZv9Z

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

What’s Next? Russia did not provoke this situation, but will now take asymmetric measures if NATO continues its destabilizing buildup. Russia seek for to restore balance. Escalation just as an answer. https://t.co/TzTOqiSPSQ

Saved - August 29, 2025 at 4:47 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Russia's unmanned boats recently sank the Ukrainian Navy ship "Simferopol" in the Danube Delta, marking the first confirmed combat use of these drones. This operation demonstrated the effectiveness of unmanned surface vehicles (USVs) in navigating tricky terrain, allowing for precise strikes without the overkill of missiles. The attack signals a shift in Black Sea warfare, with Russia moving from defense to proactive strikes. As the demand for drone strikes increases, the implications for maritime security and NATO's response are significant, highlighting the evolving dynamics of the conflict.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

🚨 BIG: Russia’s unmanned boats SANK a Ukrainian Navy ship in the Danube Delta—slipping through narrow river channels like silent assassins. This attack isn't just a blow to Ukraine, it's also a WARNING SHOT to NATO 🧵 https://t.co/woZC3XymeS

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

The target? The Ukrainian reconnaissance ship "Simferopol," caught in the tightest spot near Vilkovo in Odessa Oblast. 🔸 Russian USVs (unmanned surface vehicles) navigated from the Black Sea into the Danube’s narrow arms and blew it up. 🔸 First confirmed combat use for these drones.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

Why drones instead of missiles? Simple: overkill avoidance. 🔸 "Simferopol" was a small patrol vessel acting like a river boat. 🔸 Firing supersonic anti-ship missiles would’ve been wasteful and pricey. 🔸 USVs get the job done precisely, cheaply—dozens of times less expensive.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

Geography played a huge role too. 🔸 The Danube Delta’s shallow waters, tricky terrain, and winding channels make rocket strikes risky and imprecise. 🔸 These drones snuck in like a sabotage team, striking up close in areas where bigger weapons falter. https://t.co/epH7LAJau2

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

Plus, Russia was testing this tech in real combat. The delta served as a perfect proving ground. 🔸 This strike came just a month after their "July Storm" exercises showcased USV tactics publicly. 🔸 Talk about quick turnaround from drills to action. https://t.co/LnDximiatt

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

It’s a classic sabotage operation: from intel gathering on the target to pinpoint navigation in cramped waters. One small boat slipping past defenses and exploding under the ship proves that smart, low-key strikes can match massive rocket barrages in impact. https://t.co/PFFk4MBhOD

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

Now, consequences: This flips Black Sea warfare. 🔸 Russia isn’t just defending anymore—they’re proactively hitting back. 🔸 With heavy shipping traffic to Odessa, targets abound. 🔸 If USVs scale up, they could paralyze western Black Sea routes and choke Ukraine’s sea supplies.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

Scaling depends on two things: ramping up mass production in Russia and Ukraine’s countermeasures. Will Kiev develop tech or tactics to shield their paths? No target shortage means constant demand for these drone strikes. https://t.co/wPZHk97paq

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

Here’s the irony—call it the boomerang effect. 🔸 The West hyped Ukrainian sea drones as the ultimate tool to push Russia out of the Black Sea. 🔸 Russia studied, adapted, and now flips the script, using improved versions against Ukraine. What goes around comes around, harder.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

Broader implications: Amid NATO’s escalation games—like talks and actual attempts to intercept Russia’s "shadow fleet" of oil tankers bypassing sanctions—Russia now has a potent counter to potential piracy from hostile nations. https://t.co/Qtbk9wgaz2

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

Examples? In May 2025, an Estonian patrol boat tried to stop and inspect a suspected Russian shadow fleet tanker in the Gulf of Finland, prompting Moscow to scramble a fighter jet that briefly violated NATO airspace. EU and UK sanctions hit nearly 200 such ships too. https://t.co/zHWu9FglrT

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

These USVs aren’t just attackers—they can scout, patrol, relay for other drones, or even escort larger warships. In a world of rising maritime tensions, they’re Russia’s asymmetric answer to any aggressive moves at sea. Game on. https://t.co/0Nmi7NIUCA

Saved - September 13, 2025 at 6:12 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I've been reflecting on how Russia could disrupt Europe with minimal repercussions. Their use of drones for surveillance and potential infrastructure shutdowns poses a significant threat, especially to major air hubs. These inexpensive drones create disproportionate crises, making NATO's costly defense strategies seem ineffective. The alliance struggles with its outdated response mechanisms, leaving it vulnerable. Each drone incident stirs public panic, and NATO faces a dilemma: respond and incur massive costs or ignore the threat and appear weak. Russia's strategy effectively exposes NATO's limitations while remaining below the threshold of war.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

🚨🇷🇺🇪🇺How Can Russia Wreak Havoc Around Europe With Zero Consequences? Russian drones have breached Polish airspace in a large-scale surveillance operation. But what if Russia expands such operations across Europe? Here's why NATO and Europe wouldn't stand a chance👇🏻🧵 https://t.co/GTKNOoDcMx

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

The Target: Europe's Economic Arteries. 🔸The goal isn't just to fly over fields. It's to force the shutdown of critical infrastructure. Major air hubs like Warsaw, Berlin, or Frankfurt are incredibly vulnerable. 🔸A single drone sighting can halt all flights, causing massive economic disruption.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

The Method: Cheap, Scalable Provocation. Russia doesn't need expensive missiles. Mass-produced drones like the Geran-2 (cost: ~$10k) are the perfect tool. They are low-altitude, slow, and hard to detect, but their real power is in creating a disproportionate crisis. https://t.co/mkbExx5po2

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

Cost-Benefit Analysis is Overwhelmingly in Russia's Favor: 🔸Deploying F-35 jets ($80M+ per unit) and Patriot missile batteries ($1B+ per system) to intercept cheap drones is financially unsustainable. 🔸Each interception costs NATO far more than it costs Russia to launch the threat.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

Exploiting NATO's Structural Inefficiency: NATO's Air Policing doctrine is built for traditional aircraft, not swarms of low-flying UAVs. The requirement to scramble expensive fighter jets for every incursion is a systemic vulnerability that Russia is effectively exploiting. https://t.co/QEDjeg40WH

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

What is the consequence? 🔸Article 5 is designed for an armed attack, not a drone nuisance. New sanctions? The resource is exhausted. Military retaliation? Too escalatory. 🔸NATO's political toolkit for this gray-zone warfare is effectively empty. https://t.co/hPnxkKEx6M

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

Psychological & Social Impact: European populations are unprepared for the reality of aerial disruptions. Unlike in Russia, where airlines and passengers have adapted, each drone incident in Europe triggers media hysteria and public alarm, magnifying the perceived impact far beyond the physical threat.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

NATO's Lose-Lose Dilemma: 🔸Option 1: Ignore the drones. This makes NATO look weak and invites further escalation. 🔸Option 2: Respond. This means scrambling $80M F-35s to shoot down a $10k drone—a massive financial and operational loss. Russia wins either way. https://t.co/r4GuRM4VMn

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

The Sum of All Fears: A Campaign. Now imagine this not as a one-off event, but a sustained campaign. Regular, simultaneous incursions into Polish, Baltic, and German airspace. The economic and logistical chaos would be immense, and NATO would have no effective counter-play. https://t.co/Dxt29QeOL0

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

Conclusion: The Perfect Strategy. Russia has found a way to project power, demonstrate capability, inflict economic pain, and expose NATO's weakness—all while remaining below the threshold of war. The response is limited to whining and looking powerless because, in this new game, the traditional rules don't apply.

Saved - September 28, 2025 at 7:36 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
This week marks the third anniversary of the Nord Stream bombings, a significant sabotage of energy infrastructure. Nord Stream consists of four underwater pipelines transporting Russian gas to Europe, crucial for Germany's energy needs. The U.S. opposed the project from the start, fearing it would strengthen Russian influence. Following the explosions in September 2022, investigations by Germany, Denmark, and Sweden have faced criticism for lack of transparency. Reports suggest U.S. involvement, while a Ukrainian national has been arrested in connection with the attacks, denying any wrongdoing.

@SputnikInt - Sputnik

NORD STREAM SABOTAGE: WHO DID IT AND WHY? This week marked the third anniversary of the Nord Stream bombings, the biggest and most geopolitically significant sabotage attack on energy infrastructure in modern history 🧵 https://t.co/Wzzhtzwjvd

@SputnikInt - Sputnik

1️⃣ WHAT IS NORD STREAM? A network of 4 underwater pipelines for pumping Russian gas to Europe, two apiece via Nord Stream 1 & 2 🔸Nord Stream 1 was inaugurated in late 2011 🔸Nord Stream 2 was finished in late 2021, but never launched amid US pressure on Germany over certification

@SputnikInt - Sputnik

2️⃣ CAPACITY & SIGNIFICANCE 🔸Nord Stream offered Germany up to 110 BCM of gas per year, enough to cover all its needs & turn it into a regional energy hub 🔸It gave Russia a direct energy route to Central Europe, bypassing Eastern European governments eager to use transit as leverage

@SputnikInt - Sputnik

3️⃣ CONFLICTING INTERESTS Fearing the melding of Russia’s vast resources with German industry, & eager to sell its own, more expensive LNG to Europe, the US opposed Nord Stream from the start The Merkel government, in office until late 2021, strongly supported it https://t.co/HFQeMZq9Dm

@SputnikInt - Sputnik

4️⃣ FROM US OPPOSITION 🔸Nord Stream I was opposed by the Bush & Obama administrations before and during construction 🔸In 2019, Trump imposed sanctions on Nord Stream II, with his State Department claiming it would “undermine” Europe’s energy security https://t.co/5RdOKeePZ3

@SputnikInt - Sputnik

5️⃣ TO US THREATS 🔸In February 2022, two weeks before Russia kicked off its special military operation in Ukraine, President Biden said that if Russian “tanks or troops cross[ed] the border,” the United States would “bring an end” to Nord Stream 2 He didn’t elaborate how https://t.co/8HES8ioX4I

Video Transcript AI Summary
During a discussion on Nord Stream 2, the speaker states: "If Germany if, if Russia invades, that means tanks or troops crossing the, the the border of Ukraine, again, then, there will be, we there will be no longer a Nord Stream two." "We we will bring an end to it." He is asked, "What do what how will you how will you do that exactly since the project and control of the project is within Germany's control?" The response: "We will I promise you we'll be able to do it." The passage ties a potential Russian invasion to the termination of Nord Stream 2 and asserts the ability to end the project despite German governance.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If Germany if, if Russia invades, that means tanks or troops crossing the, the the border of Ukraine, again, then, there will be, we there will be no longer a Nord Stream two. We we will bring an end to it. What do what how will you how will you do that exactly since the project and control of the project is within Germany's control? We will I promise you we'll be able to do it.

@SputnikInt - Sputnik

6️⃣ SABOTAGE TIMELINE On September 26, 2022, at 2:03 am & 7:03 pm local time, seismic monitoring stations in Denmark, Sweden, and Germany picked up signs of underwater explosions 3 of the network’s 4 pipelines were hit, 80M below the Baltic Sea, in Denmark’s exclusive economic zone

@SputnikInt - Sputnik

7️⃣ BIGGEST ATTACK OF ITS KIND Putin called the attack an “Anglo-Saxon” plot to destroy “Europe’s entire energy infrastructure” Russia’s Prosecutor General launched a case, treating it as international terrorism The bombings caused the largest human-caused methane release in history

@SputnikInt - Sputnik

8️⃣ EUROPE’S CLOWNSHOW PROBES Germany, Denmark & Sweden began separate investigations. Moscow slammed them for foot-dragging & refusal to cooperate with Russia Denmark & Sweden inexplicably closed their probes in 2024 without publicizing results. Germany’s investigation continues

@SputnikInt - Sputnik

9️⃣ HERSH’S BOMBSHELL In March 2023, veteran investigative journalist Sy Hersh reported that the Nord Stream attacks were carried out by US Navy divers with Norwegian support, personally authorized by President Biden, & planned with support from the CIA https://t.co/FBvYhRmms6

Video Transcript AI Summary
Johnson's premise for expanding the war and getting congressional commitment to do whatever he wanted in the war—"the Tonkin Gulf resolution in the congress passed after after Johnson lied about what happened in the war." He "invented a a North Vietnamese attack," and the war killed 58,000 Americans and "anywhere between one and three million Vietnamese." "That's the way we deal with these people of a different race, I guess." What's gonna happen now? "Germany, in late September last year, it was clear that whatever we thought about Ukraine winning the war or standing up to the Russians was gonna be very unlikely." Putin is telling Western Europe and the Germans, particularly the Germans, that "we value we're so worried that you might decide not to support us all the way because you're getting oil from Russia." "They controlled the pipeline, as I said, the Germans." So what he did is he said to Europe and Western, "you can't in a crunch, you know, we're gonna let you be cold." "It's not cold this year, but the real worry is next winter."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What happened in Norway, the reason I wrote the piece of suck substack talk going back to Lyndon Johnson, we all know that Johnson's premise for go expanding the war and getting congressional commitment to do whatever he wanted in the war. The same as the the one that George Bush got after nine eleven that led him to go to Iraq. He could do what he wanted. He got a complete bill of goods, rights, front in in a speech called the Tonkin Gulf resolution in the congress passed after after Johnson lied about what happened in the war. He invented a a North Vietnamese attack. He and MacDamara conspired to change the intelligence. It's not this is not new. It's been known. But I used I'm I'm I was thinking of that in the context of Johnson lied about something that led us into a war that killed 58,000 Americans and get this, anywhere between one and three million Vietnamese. We don't know. That's that's the way we deal with the with these people of a different race, I guess, one to 3,000,000. And so here we have a president's line about a not telling truth about something he authorized that did happen. And what's gonna happen now? Germany, I think the reason for it, I think in late September last year, it was clear that whatever we thought about Ukraine winning the war or standing up to the Russians was gonna be very unlikely, which it is going to be very unlikely despite what you read in the daily newspapers. It's not going well at all. So Putin is telling Western Europe and the Germans, particularly the Germans, that, well, we value we're so worried that you might decide not to support us all the way because you're getting oil from Russia. They controlled the pipeline, as I said, the Germans. He was worried they would drop the sanctions and start taking the gas again. So what he did is is he said to Europe and Western, well, you can't in a crunch, you know, we're gonna let you be cold. It's not cold this year, but I will tell you right now, the real worry is next winter.

@SputnikInt - Sputnik

🔟 DISTRACTION ACTION Several weeks later, legacy US & German media began issuing their own stories, citing unnamed intelligence officials, claiming the attacks were carried out by a ragtag group of Ukrainians using a rented yacht, & that NATO didn’t know. Russia didn’t buy it. https://t.co/lFdEBOJmlh

@SputnikInt - Sputnik

1️⃣1️⃣ BLAME THE PATSY In August 2025, Ukrainian national Sergey Kuznetsov was arrested in Italy on a German warrant in connection with the attacks. His extradition is before Italy’s Supreme Court Kuznetsov denies the charges & claims he was in Ukraine at the time of the attacks https://t.co/h5Tz77S9Xj

@SputnikInt - Sputnik

1️⃣2️⃣ PUTIN HINTS WHO DID IT In his 2024 interview with Tucker Carlson, Russia’s president revealed who he suspects is behind Nord Stream’s destruction, saying it required both the motivation & the capabilities to pull off, & hinting CIA involvement https://t.co/hRLy38EhN9

Video Transcript AI Summary
“Who blew up Nord Stream?” “You for sure.” “I did not blow up Nord Stream.” “In the war of propaganda, it is very difficult to defeat The United States because The United States controls all the world’s media and many European media.” “The ultimate beneficiary beneficiary of the biggest European media are American financial institutions.” “We can simply shine the spotlight on our sources of information, and we will not achieve results.” “Germany leadership is guided by the interests of the collective West rather than its national interests.” “There are two gas routes through Ukraine.” “Open the second route and please get gas from Russia.” “The world is breaking into two hemispheres.” “The head is split in two parts, it is an illness.” “The dollar is the cornerstone of The United States power.” “USD transactions down from about 80% of Russian foreign trade to 13%.” “34% of our transactions are made in rubles, and about as much a little over 34% in yuan.” “Cooperation with China keeps increasing.” “The pace at which China’s cooperation with Europe is growing is higher and greater than that of the growth of Chinese Russian cooperation.” “Before introducing any illegitimate sanctions, illegitimate in terms of the charter of the United Nations, one should think very carefully.” “Ask Europeans, aren’t they afraid?”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Who blew up Nord Stream? Speaker 1: You for sure. Speaker 0: I was busy that day. Nate, do you have do you Speaker 1: I did not blow up Nord Speaker 0: Stream. Thank you, though. Speaker 1: Who was You personally may have an alibi, but the CIA has no such alibi. Speaker 0: Did you have evidence that NATO or the CIA did it? Speaker 1: You know, I won't get into details, but people always say in such cases, look for someone who is interested. But in this case, we should not only look for someone who is interested, but also for someone who has capabilities. Because there may be many people interested, but not all of them are capable of sinking to the bottom of the Baltic Sea and carrying out this explosion. These two components should be connected. Who is interested and who is capable of doing it? Speaker 0: But I'm confused. I mean, that's the biggest act of industrial terrorism ever, and it's the largest emission of c o two in in history. Okay. So if you had evidence and presumably given your security services or intel services, you would, that NATO, The US, CIA, the West did this. Why wouldn't you present it and win a propaganda victory? Speaker 1: In the war of propaganda, it is very difficult to defeat The United States because The United States controls all the world's media and many European media. The ultimate beneficiary beneficiary of the biggest European media are American financial institutions. Don't you know that? So it is possible to get involved in this work, but it is cost prohibitive, so to speak. We can simply shine the spotlight on our sources of information, and we will not achieve results. It is clear to the whole world what happened, and even American analysts talk about it directly. It's true. Speaker 0: Yes. Here's a question you may be to answer. You worked in Germany, famously. The Germans clearly know that their NATO partner did this, but they and it damaged their economy greatly. It may never recover. Why are they being silent about it? That's very confusing to me. Why wouldn't the Germans say something about Speaker 1: it? This also confuses me. But today's German leadership is guided by the interests of the collective West rather than its national interests. Otherwise, it is difficult to explain the logic of their action or inaction. After all, it is not only about Nord Stream one, which was blown up, and the Nord Stream 2 was damaged, but one pipe is safe and sound and gas can be supplied to Europe through it. But Germany does not open it. We are ready, please. There is another route through Poland called Yamal Europe, which also allows for large flow. Poland has closed it, but Poland pecks from the German hand, It receives money from the Pan European funds, and Germany is the main donor to these Pan European funds. Germany feeds Poland to the certain extent, and they closed their route to Germany. Why? I don't understand. Ukraine to which the Germans supply weapons and give money. Germany is the second sponsor of The United States in terms of financial aid to Ukraine. There are two gas routes through Ukraine. They simply closed one route to Ukrainians. Open the second route and please get gas from Russia. They do not open it. Why don't the Germans say? Look, guys, we give you money and weapons. Open up the valve, please. Let the gas from Russia pass through for us. We are buying liquified gas at exorbitant prices in Europe, which brings the level of our competitiveness and economy in general down to zero. Do you want us to give you money? Let us have the decent existence, make money for our economy because this is where the money we give you comes from. They refuse to do so. Why? Ask them. That is what is like in their heads. Those are highly incompetent people. Speaker 0: Well, maybe the world is breaking into two hemispheres, one with cheap energy, the other without, and I wanna ask you that. If if we're now a multipolar world, obviously we are, can you describe the blocks of alliances? Who who who is in each side, do Speaker 1: you think? Listen. You have said that the world is breaking into two hemispheres. A human brain is divided into two hemispheres. One is responsible for one type of activities, the other one is more about creativity and so on. But it is still one and the same head. The world should be a single whole. Security should be shared rather than a meant for the golden billion. That is the only scenario where the world could be stable, sustainable and predictable. Until then, while the head is split in two parts, it is an illness, a serious adverse condition. It is a period of severe disease that the world is going through now. But I think that thanks to honest journalism, this work is akin to work of the doctors, this could somehow be remedied. Speaker 0: Well, let's just give one example. The the US dollar, which has kind of united the world in a lot of ways, maybe not to your advantage, but certainly ours. Is that going away as the reserve currency, the common the universally accepted currency? How have sanctions, do you think, changed the dollar's place in the world? Speaker 1: You know, to use the dollar as a tool of foreign policy struggle is one of the biggest strategic mistakes made by The US political leadership. The dollar is the cornerstone of The United States power. I think everyone understands very well that no matter how many dollars are printed, they are quickly dispersed all over the world. Inflation in The United States is minimal. It's about three or 3.4%, which is, I think, totally acceptable for The US. But they won't stop printing. What does the debt of $33,000,000,000,000 tell us about? It is about the emission. Nevertheless, it is the main weapon used by The United States to preserve its power across the world. As soon as the political leadership decided to use the US dollar as a tool of political struggle, a blow was dealt to this American power. I would not like to use any strong language, but it is a stupid thing to do and a grave mistake. Look at what is going on in the world. Even The United States allies are now downsizing their dollar reserves. Seeing this, everyone starts looking for ways to protect themselves. But the fact that The United States applies restrictive measures to certain countries, such as placing restrictions on transactions, freezing assets, etcetera, causes great concern and sends a signal to the whole world. What did we have here? Until 2022, about 80% of Russian foreign trade transactions were made in US dollars and euros. US dollars accounted for approximately 50% of our transactions with third countries, while currently it is down to 13%. It wasn't us who banned the use of the US dollar. We had no such intention. It was decision of The United States to restrict our transactions in US dollars. I think it is complete foolishness from the point of view of the interest of The United States itself and its taxpayers, as it damages The US economy, undermines the power of The United States across the world. By the way, our transactions in yuan accounted for about 3%. Today, 34% of our transactions are made in rubles, and about as much a little over 34% in yuan. Why did The United States do this? My only guess is self conceived. They probably thought it would lead to full collapse, but nothing collapsed. Moreover, other countries, including oil producers, are thinking of and already accepting payments for oil in Yuan. Do you even realize what is going on or not? Does anyone in The United States realize this? What are you doing? You're cutting yourself off. All experts say this. Ask any intelligent and thinking person in The United States what the dollar means for The US. But you're killing it with your own hands. Speaker 0: I think that's a fair I I think that's a fair assessment. The question is what comes next. And maybe you trade one colonial power for another much less sentimental and forgiving colonial power. I mean, is the the BRICS, for example, in danger of being completely dominated by the Chinese, the Chinese economy, in a way that's not good for their sovereignty? Do you worry about that? Speaker 1: We have heard those boogeyman stories before. It is a boogeyman story. We're neighbors with China. You cannot choose neighbors just as you cannot choose close relatives. We share a border of thousand kilometers with them. This is number one. Second, we have a centuries long history of coexistence. We're used to it. Third, China's foreign policy philosophy is not aggressive. Its idea is to always look for compromise, and we can see that. The next point is as follows. We are always told the same boogeyman story, and here it goes again, through an euphemistic form, but it is still the same boogeyman story. The cooperation with China keeps increasing. The pace at which China's cooperation with Europe is growing is higher and greater than that of the growth of Chinese Russian cooperation. Ask Europeans, aren't they afraid? They might be, I don't know. But they are still trying to access China's market at all costs, especially now that they are facing economic problems. Chinese businesses are also exploring the European market. Do Chinese businesses have small presence in The United States? Yes. The political decisions are such that they are trying to limit their cooperation with China. It is to your own detriment, mister Tucker, that you are limiting cooperation with China. You are hurting yourself. It is a delicate matter, and there are no silver bullet solutions, just as it is with the dollar. Before introducing any illegitimate sanctions, illegitimate in terms of the charter of the United Nations, one should think very carefully. For decision makers, this appears to be a problem.
Saved - October 10, 2025 at 1:38 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Ukraine faces a devastating wave of attacks on its energy infrastructure, with massive strikes reported across multiple cities. Kiev is plunged into darkness after over 30 explosions, disrupting metro and train services. Krivoy Rog and Dnepropetrovsk experience widespread power outages, with significant damage to thermal power plants. The Dnipro Hydroelectric Power Station in Zaporozhye is also targeted, halting traffic. Other regions, including Poltava and Chernigov, report similar strikes. The coordinated nature of these attacks highlights the challenges facing Ukrainian defenses and aims to cripple military logistics.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

🚨🇺🇦🇷🇺Ukraine Plunged Into Darkness: Massive Retaliatory Strikes Cripple Energy Network Russia launches massive, coordinated attack on Ukrainian energy infrastructure. This is a response to recent Ukrainian drone attacks on Russian territory. Here's a breakdown🧵 https://t.co/0VOhSnOzK7

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

📍Kiev: Capital in total darkness 🔸30+ explosions reported in the capital by Geran drones. 🔸2 thermal power plants hit. 🔸Left bank district without power & water. 🔸Metro & train services disrupted. Strikes are reported to be ongoing. https://t.co/vx0OczF35v

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

📍Krivoy Rog: About 30 explosions reported in the city. Widespread power outages are being experienced by residents. https://t.co/MY5pstyY9u

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

📍Dnepropetrovsk: Power Plant Hit Multiple strikes recorded. A major target was the Prydniprovska Thermal Power Plant (TPP). https://t.co/twuQIXEHfc

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

📍Zaporozhye: Dam in the Crosshairs Explosions reported near the critical Dnipro Hydroelectric Power Station. All traffic on the dam has been stopped. https://t.co/mjrlN9EucL

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

📍Poltava & Cherkassy: Infrastructure Targeted Strikes hit key energy and railway infrastructure in Poltava. Confirmed power outages are affecting the region. https://t.co/V6T2EMc2DH

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

📍Chernigov: Drones Take Aim 🔸A energy facility attacked by Geran drones. 🔸Over 4,500 people in the dark. 🔸Train traffic disrupted. 🔸A TPP seriously damaged. https://t.co/eyaSNXMeHJ

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

📍Kharkov: Lights Go Out Shocking video shows the moment the city went black after explosions from Geran drones. The reality on the ground. https://t.co/EgrBsLZtuv

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

📍Odessa: Relentless Barrage Massive strikes pounding the region. New "Geran" missiles incoming. 🔸Impacts in Ilyichevsk (Chornomorsk). 🔸~14 impacts in just 7 minutes. https://t.co/KLT5adyhsg

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

📍Lvov (Oct 5 Strike): West Not Spared Industrial & energy facilities hit. 🔸Warehouses, garages, service stations damaged. 🔸A regional gas storage facility caught fire. https://t.co/7L0vtvGK1I

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

Conclusion The coordinated strikes of last night demonstrate the futility of the Ukrainian defenses in the conflict. 🔸Objective: Cripple military-logistical capacity. 🔸Method: Overwhelm air defenses with simultaneous, multi-directional attacks from drones & missiles. 🔸Impact: This inflicts long-term, costly damage, stretching Ukraine's resources.

Saved - October 15, 2025 at 9:08 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I view Russia’s energy war as evolving from blunt shocks to a siege. Phase 1 (2022–23) tested resilience with mass, indiscriminate strikes on generation assets. Phase 2 (2024) shifted to permanent energy deficits as rolling blackouts became routine. Phase 3 (2025) launches a three-front, precision campaign: localized grid collapse, gas-infrastructure trade-offs, and de-electrified railways, aiming to fracture society. The endgame is social pressure to negotiate on Russia’s terms.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

🚨🇷🇺🇺🇦Russia's Energy War 2.0: A Strategic Shift from Shock to Siege Russia's campaign against Ukrainian energy is no longer about spectacle. It has evolved into a methodical, multi-year strategy to weaponize winter & fracture society. Here's how👇🧵 https://t.co/00p2WSz9mV

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

Phase 1 (2022-23): The Blunt Instrument. Objective: Demonstrate capability & test resilience. 🔸Mass, indiscriminate strikes on large generation assets. 🔸Result: Severe but manageable via emergency measures (rolling blackouts, load maneuvering). The system, while wounded, proved adaptable.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

Phase 2 (2024): From Disruption to Degradation. A strategic pivot triggered by Kiev's escalation (e.g., Kursk incursion). The goal shifted: 🔸Old: Temporary disruption. 🔸New: Create a permanent energy deficit. 🔸Outcome: Rolling blackouts became the grim norm, exhausting rapid recovery capacity.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

Phase 3 (2025): The "Siege" Model - Precision & Exhaustion. This is the core of the new strategy. Instead of a system-wide knockout, Russia is executing a coordinated, three-front campaign designed to paralyze Ukraine region by region. https://t.co/pCmhP4XT5D

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

Front 1: Localized Grid Collapse. 🔸Tactic: Concentrated strikes on distribution networks in frontline oblasts. 🔸Strategic Rationale: Prevents load redistribution. By isolating regions, they negate Ukraine's ability to "share" power, making each local failure a permanent crisis.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

Front 2: The Brutal Trade-off. 🔸Tactic: Targeting gas infrastructure. 🔸Strategic Rationale: Creates an impossible choice for civilians and authorities: divert gas for heating OR for electricity generation. This weaponizes basic human needs against the state's capacity. https://t.co/phmZStvDK0

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

Front 3: Logistics Strangulation. 🔸Tactic: De-electrifying railway networks. 🔸Strategic Rationale: Directly targets military resupply chains while also crippling economic activity. It's a force multiplier that compounds the civilian crisis with military logistical decay. https://t.co/qpjle7LqKZ

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

The Strategic Endgame: Societal Fracture. The ultimate target is not the grid itself, but the social contract. 🔸By making normal life impossible in specific regions, the strategy aims to generate localized, then national, discontent. 🔸The objective is to use public pressure as a lever to force negotiations on Russian terms.

@NewRulesGeo - NewRulesGeopolitics

Conclusion: A War of Attrition with a New Toolkit. Russia now possesses the drone arsenal to scale this "siege" model indefinitely. The 2025 outlook is not for a single blackout, but for a prolonged, managed erosion of energy security. Kiev's dilemma is stark: find countermeasures for this decentralized assault or face escalating internal strain.

Saved - October 17, 2025 at 6:24 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I describe Russia’s Poseidon: a nuclear-powered, unmanned underwater drone that travels entirely underwater, bypassing defenses by cruising stealthily at depth and slow speeds. Likely yield 2–10 megatons, enough to flatten coastal cities and irradiate harbors but not flood continents. Built for a second-strike, it can near-shore detonate offshore, spreading radioactive seawater and wrecking infrastructure. The Pentagon says it’s hard to detect, not invisible, and Western navies are countering it.

@MarioNawfal - Mario Nawfal

🇷🇺 POSEIDON: RUSSIA’S UNDERWATER DOOMSDAY TORPEDO No, it’s not a 300-megaton super-nuke that will unleash a 1,500-foot radioactive tsunami to swallow cities whole - but it’s still terrifying. Russia’s Poseidon is a nuclear-powered, unmanned underwater drone, not a missile. It travels entirely underwater, bypassing missile defenses by cruising in stealth mode at low speeds and deep depths. Its likely yield? Somewhere between 2 and 10 megatons, enough to flatten coastal cities and irradiate harbors, but not to flood continents. Designed for a second-strike, it can sneak close to U.S shores and detonate offshore - spreading radioactive seawater and wrecking infrastructure. The Pentagon calls it “difficult to detect,” but not invisible - and definitely not invincible. Western navies are already working on ways to counter it. So no, it won’t destroy half the planet. But it’s a floating nuclear death bot with a grudge, and that’s bad enough. Source: FT, The Bulletin, National Interest

Video Transcript AI Summary
In 2016 Russia announced a new type of torpedo called Poseidon. It is 20 meters long and 2 meters in diameter, three times the size of a conventional torpedo. This torpedo uses a small nuclear reactor as propulsion, and it has a limited range. Poseidon is expected to carry a 2 megaton nuclear warhead. It can be launched from a submarine or from a special vessel. Poseidon travels slowly and is not easily detected, moving underwater before it detonates. The nuclear explosion would cause radioactive contamination and could have long-term effects.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: 2016 年 ロシア は 新 型 魚 雷 ポセイドン を 発 表 し ま し た 全 長 20 m 直径 2 m と 通 常 の 魚 雷 の 3 倍 の 大 き さ です こ の 魚 雷 は 推 進 力 と し て 小 型 原 子 炉 を 搭 載 し 射程 制限 です ポセイドン は おそら く 2 メガ トン の 核 弾 頭 を 搭 載 する で しょう 潜水 艦 ま た は 特殊 艦 艇 から 発射 さ れ た ポセイドン は 、ゆっくり と 探 知 さ れ ず に 航行 し 水中 で 爆 発 し ます 。 核 爆 発 は 放射 能 汚 染 を 引き 起こし 、長期 的 な 影 響 を 及 ぼ す 可能 性 が あります 。

@MarioNawfal - Mario Nawfal

🇷🇺🇺🇦 PUTIN WARNS UKRAINE: “HIT OUR NUCLEAR PLANT AND SEE WHAT HAPPENS” Putin warned Ukraine against attacks near the Zaporizhzhia nuclear plant, saying Moscow could retaliate against Ukrainian nuclear sites. He called it “idiotic” to accuse Russia of shelling a plant it controls. He insists the situation was under control despite Europe’s largest nuclear station running on emergency generators. Source: Reuters

@MarioNawfal - Mario Nawfal

🇺🇦 185 SOLDIERS, 20 CIVILIANS FREED IN LATEST RUSSIA-UKRAINE SWAP Zelensky says Ukraine has brought home 185 troops and 20 civilians in the newest exchange with Russia - many held captive since 2022. Photos showed returnees draped in blue-and-yellow flags, a moment of relief in https://t.co/ixojwezTbY

Saved - March 21, 2026 at 5:49 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
LovesKetty15762 starts a thread mentioning icu_luci and LuxNasta. Ketty shares a link; LuxNasta replies, noting the Russo‑Ukrainian conflict has largely faded from OSINT focus, but they still monitor it, including politics.

@LovesKetty15762 - Kettymporta

@icu_luci @LuxNasta https://t.co/1cMosk8h0Y

@LovesKetty15762 - Kettymporta

https://t.co/E35icayVqv

@LuxNasta - Lux Nasta 🇩🇪

@LovesKetty15762 🤔☕️ The Russo Ukraine conflict got pushed to the back ground by the majority in the OSINT community, that's true. But I am still keeping tabs on it incl politics... https://t.co/PlL0nnjK8a

@LuxNasta - Lux Nasta 🇩🇪

@DEPLORABLEFACE US NATO EXIT+ https://t.co/VD6lagSMur

View Full Interactive Feed