reSee.it - Related Post Feed
reSee.it AI Summary
Congressman Dan Crenshaw physically assaulted a right-wing reporter, Noel Fritsch, from National File. This incident adds to a pattern of anger management issues, like when Crenshaw punched a table during the Speaker vote. Such behavior is unacceptable for a U.S. Congressman.
@LauraLoomer - Laura Loomer
WOW @DanCrenshawTX physically assaulted @NoelFritsch, a right wing reporter from @NationalFile today! Crenshaw is so unhinged. He has serious anger management issues. Remember when his knuckles were bloody during the Speaker vote in January because he got so angry with people who didn’t want to vote for @SpeakerMcCarthy, and decided to punch a table? Crenshaw is nuts. Totally unacceptable behavior from a U.S. Congressman.
@AbsoluteWithE - The Absolute Truth with @EmeraldRobinson
The reporter for @gatewaypundit who was assaulted by a federal agent has filed an official police report. @CaraCastronuova tells @EmeraldRobinson how it all went down. Will there be accountability for this attempt to intimidate a journalist? https://t.co/W7hKFxGOla
Video Transcript AI Summary
The video features an interview with Kara Castronova, a journalist who was assaulted by a federal official while asking questions about the January 6th incident at the US Capitol. Castronova explains how she was pushed by the official and expresses concern about potential retaliation. The discussion also focuses on the trial of Luke Coffey, who is accused of assaulting a police officer named Lila Morris. Castronova highlights inconsistencies in Morris' testimony and argues that Coffey is being wrongly charged. The video concludes with an advertisement for MyPillow 2.0.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: To go through a press report. Who's your press person? Why did why were the police escorted so quickly out out the door? Like, why are you clearly seen beating a woman? Beating a woman.
Okay. She Do you think
Speaker 1: that Roseanne Boylan was murdered January 6?
Speaker 0: No. Do you think
Speaker 1: Lila Moore? Why are you
Speaker 0: protecting somebody that you've seen beating? I thought you were against police brutality. You're not against police brutality? No comments. Are you not against police brutality?
No common? So, Roseanne Boyland, life doesn't matter. You didn't have to answer to journalists. Do you not believe in freedom of press? No comments.
Okay. No comments. You guys, I hope that you put this together. So for your time, I'm gonna be
Speaker 2: Do you believe that Lila Morris
Speaker 1: murdered Roseanne Boylan January 6th at the US Capitol?
Speaker 0: It's a conspiracy. You're all gonna go to jail.
Speaker 2: Wow. Another day in Biden's America and another unlawful assault on not just the first The first amendment, but literally an assault on a reporter, a great journalist asking questions about January 6th. Of course, in Biden's America, we're not allowed to question the official narrative, and that's what The Gateway Pundits, Kara Castronova was doing when she was assaulted by a federal official who was walking with a January 6th prosecutor. The reason that Kara Castronova was questioning federal secutors was because they are prosecuting a man named Luke Coffey. Coffey is accused of assaulting a police officer on January 6th named Lila Morris.
Now here are pictures of Coffey from j 6. Luke Coffey is an innocent man. The young man attempted to shield another protester beaten by Capitol Police with a crutch. As you see here, he called for calm and peace. You know, feds don't care about the facts.
They want another MAGA scout for their collection. And as part of their desperation to prove their lie that January 6th was an insurrection. Lila Morris, the capitol police officer, is in fact the one who should be on trial. After viciously beating January 6th protester, Roseanne Boylan, to death with her police Baton. Morris was whisked away by her federal colleagues in court only to go from being a cop who brutalizes the public To a key witness in Luke Coffey's trial.
Her testimony could put the innocent Luke Coffey behind bars. In fact, though she should be the one behind bars, Morris claims Coffey assaulted her. Though throughout the trial presided over by judge Rudolph Contreras, that's a familiar name, has been pushing the case forward despite the fact that Coffey's attorney got Morris to admit under oath that Coffey never once assaulted her. In fact, it was officer Morris who overrides Roseanne Boylan. And joining us now is the woman who demanded answer from federal prosecutors in that clip, miss Kara Castronova, who just continued to not back down.
I I have to say I was Shocked. Even before Gateway Pendant put out the story and the specific story that they had assaulted you, I was watching it. I watched it back and forth several times Just to state that literally that man backs up and pushes you.
Speaker 3: Right. I mean, it was I'm still in shock by it. It just goes to show how little, these people think they they could get away with anything because there's a camera there, and he didn't care. He still pushed me knowing that there was someone filming it knowing that he's not going to get into trouble. Many people have encouraged me to file a police report, which you're probably going to do today, And, you know, I I was outside of the courtroom.
I had waited there. I followed the rules. That's where journalists could wait for witnesses to come out, and I wanted to ask Lila Morris some questions. Lila Morris, who you mentioned earlier, who was seen beating Roseanne Boylan with a stick before she died on January 6th. And they whisked her out the back door or out a and it actually wasn't the back door.
It was an entrance even the security guards didn't know about. I've never seen a witness be protected by federal agents like that, and I've been to a lot of these court trials? So I waited outside for her and who came out with the federal agents without her because they have put her out somewhere else. And shockingly, I mean, I wasn't shocked that they didn't answer questions that was to be expected, but I was shocked that one of them actually pushed me. So they they have no fear.
They don't think there's repercussions. Go ahead.
Speaker 2: Yeah. I was actually shocked. I I I've gotten, you know, gotten up to people and ask them questions? I've never had anyone do that to me. So you think you will probably file a police report?
Speaker 3: I think so. And I I saw someone send me a video change, and this happened something similar, very similar tactic. I don't know if this is a federal tactic in in Canada. A journalist was Shoved the same way. And I guess he reacted, and then they they arrested him.
So, you know, people have been writing me on, on Twitter, clear on emails saying, you know, you need to press charges against this guy. He very clearly assaulted you. And, you know, I rolled it around into my far? That we live in in America right now where when you're a journalist just doing your job and a female and you get pushed that you have to worry. Like, I'm worried, like, where are they gonna find a way to retaliate against me somehow?
It's very scary that we live in a country where you're a female journalist and you feel afraid to press charges against somebody that assaulted you because you don't because you know they're Federal agent and you know that they could, you know, try to ruin your life.
Speaker 2: Well, yeah. Look what they're doing to Steve Baker to try to imitate intimidate him into not, Reporting further on January 6th, and you've been doing some great reporting. I look. If the guy only knew who you were, he might have been a little more worried about doing that. He probably didn't know you're a boxer, but I don't wanna make light of the situation because it it is a big deal, and it is absolutely appalling.
Again, I just watched it over and over. Also appalling is what's happening inside that courtroom to mister Luke Coffey. I wanna get to some of the facts in the case. Cara, a court transcript of witness test Testimony confirms what we see in j six surveillance footage that we'll play in a moment. The witness confirming that Morris Morris murdered that Capitol police woman, Lila Morris murdered Roseanne Boyland on January 6th, saying that she did so while she was already bleeding and lying on the ground unconscious.
But it's not Lila Morris being tried in a court of law. It's actually Luke Coffey and she's one of the witnesses against him. So how important is what she did to Roseanne Boylan, which she's not being held accountable for, to mister Coffey's case?
Speaker 3: Well, she's, he's being accused of hitting her, and she actually got on the stand. And the video shows the opposite. He didn't hit her. And, you know, the the defense did a good job in getting her to say that she was never assaulted by Luke Coffey. Hopefully, that matters to the judge.
This is a bench trial. The judge is making the decision. This, Luke Coffey opted opted not to have a trial by peers because everyone knows that the DC, jury are not peers. They're actually the opposite, and everybody has been found guilty that's been before a DC jury. So he opted for a bench wild?
So Lila Morris admitted she was never hit by Lou Coffey. So that you know, they should drop that count right off of his, out of his case, and they haven't done so yet. And, Like like you you showed with the video earlier, Lou Coffey ran up to the line with his with a crutch that he found on the ground, and he held it above his head. And right after, he saw Lila Morris speeding? Roseanne Boylan.
He actually got hit as well by the stick on the arm. So Luke Koffe got hit on the arm, with Lila Morris' stick quick? That she was wielding and hitting Roseanne Boilan with, yet he's the one being charged for assaulting her when she actually assaulted him and Roseanne Boylan. So it's completely upside down. It's infuriating being in in these courtrooms.
The prosecutors are so smug and disgusting. Watching Lila Morris I was sickening as well. She barely spoke above above a whisper, which I was very surprised, and I was surprised that the judge didn't ask her to speak loudly because he always, Judges generally, when witnesses are speaking, if they have to be audible to the courtroom, and you could barely hear a word she was saying. So just watching these people get away with What they're getting away with is completely an, an utterly disgusting. And I have no choice to because I'm here to tell the truth and and documented, but it's very difficult as a human being to witness such evil?
Speaker 2: And we appreciate you for continuing to do so even in the the light of physical abuse. We'll let our viewers know that mister Anthony Salvatini, Luke Coffey's attorney, will be joining us tomorrow for more on this trial. Thank you so much, Kara. Keep us posted. General.
Up next, we're gearing up for the most important election in history, and there's still problems. We discuss after the break.
Speaker 4: Looks like you've been sleeping well.
Speaker 0: Megan, he's back, the My Pillow guy.
Speaker 4: And you're looking good.
Speaker 0: Still feeling good.
Speaker 4: Well, just when you thought it couldn't get any better, we've got the best pillow ever, MyPillow 2.0. When I invented MyPillow, it had everything you'd ever want in a pillow. Well, now there's new technology that makes it even better. MyPillow 2.0 has my patented fill combined with a cooling fabric with temperature regulating thread. MyPillow 2.0 far?
Truly the next generation of MyPillow.
Speaker 0: Now is the time to go to my pillow.com or call the number on your screen. Use the promo code to save 50% on your MyPillow 2.0? Not only that, for a limited time, your entire order ships absolutely free.
Speaker 4: You're sleeping even better.
Speaker 0: And cooler too.
Speaker 4: And you're looking good.
Speaker 0: Feeling good.
Speaker 4: I knew you would. Marco.com.
@VoteHarrisOut - Philip Anderson
🚨BREAKING: Kamala Harris supporters brutally gang assault a young girl who was going to attend the Trump rally. https://t.co/8FpbdmmNxs
@libsoftiktok - Libs of TikTok
BREAKING: Rep Nancy Mace was violently assaulted at the Capitol today by an LGBTQ Trans activist. The attacker has been arrested. All for not wanting men in women’s bathrooms. Why do Democrats always resort to violence? https://t.co/X5bNSGuZ1l
@libsoftiktok - Libs of TikTok
A man walked into the Capitol yesterday and physically assaulted a Representative. Has a single Democrat member of Congress condemned this violent attack on a woman?
@libsoftiktok - Libs of TikTok
Nancy Mace appears in a hand brace after being assaulted by an LGBTQ activist in the Capitol. This epidemic of Leftist violence is very alarming. https://t.co/kFW01PrbJx
@libsoftiktok - Libs of TikTok
Trans activist punches citizen journalist @dittletv in the face. TRANS VIOLENCE IS VIOLENCE https://t.co/bwdM4tftFF
Video Transcript AI Summary
A woman is being confronted about her actions, with someone insisting she should not be allowed to leave. There’s chaos as people repeatedly ask where she is going and attempt to stop her. Accusations of physical aggression arise, with claims that someone has been hit. The situation escalates, and there are demands for accountability, including pressing charges. The speaker emphasizes that everything is being recorded on video, highlighting the seriousness of the incident.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: No. Person says you're look. A woman Right. Right. He does not accept.
He's not a woman that shouldn't be. Excuse me. The sexualization of children Don't let her go or him go. Yo. Where's he going?
Where's he going? Where's he going? Where's he going? Where's he going? Where's he going?
Where's he Where's she going? I'm about to have to get her again. Where is she going? Get her. Get her.
Get her. Get her. Stop. Get her. Get her.
Stop. What are you doing? Stop. What are you doing? Stop.
What are you doing? Stop. What are you doing? Stop. What are you doing?
Stop. What's up? Stop. He's touching me. He hit me.
He hit me. He hit me. What the fuck? You understand me? Put her in a hurry.
Put your hands on that again. Letting her go. Listen to me. They're letting her go. They have her right there.
Okay? K. Now that They have her right there. You got it? No.
Come back. I just got shocked right there. She's right there. Okay? You gonna press charges?
Yes. I am. Okay. Oh, no. You got my It's all on video.
It's all on video. Yeah.
@Breaking911 - Breaking911
THIS IS CRAZY: An AOC staffer just assaulted @nicksortor in the Capitol. And then AOC says "sir don't touch me... you touched me on the stairs." @nicksortor NEVER put his hands on her. Video proves this. This woman is a deranged, pathological liar. https://t.co/RZuryyQ2t5
Video Transcript AI Summary
Ocasio-Cortez addresses the struggles her district faces due to the border crisis. Tension rises as someone attempts to intervene, leading to a confrontation where she expresses frustration over being touched and pushed. She questions whether the Biden administration is being consulted to address the border issues. The situation escalates with both parties exchanging heated remarks, emphasizing the urgency of the matter while highlighting the physical altercation.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's Ocasio Cortez. Your yeah. So your district is really suffering under the the pressure of the border crisis. What? Why why are Don't I'm sorry.
Don't try to get through this floor, man. Don't touch me. What do you What? Your your your district is very much suffering for the border crime. Right?
Border crime. Why will you not no. You're out of my way. Excuse me, sir. Just go out of my way.
Get dude, fucking get your hands off me. What? You're going upstairs, man. Relax. Stop flaxing me.
Sir, are you talking to the Biden administration about about thank you, about fixing the border that you get off of me? What is wrong with you? You have to touch me on the stairs. Thank you. I did not touch you.
I have an old video.
@Bubblebathgirl - Paul A. Szypula 🇺🇸
AOC’s staffers ASSAULT journalist @nicksortor as AOC runs away from his border question. She then lies and says that Nick was touching her. Only on 𝕏 do you see the real dirty truth of how disgraceful lawmakers act. https://t.co/prAe0D5H9v
Video Transcript AI Summary
Ocasio-Cortez discusses the impact of the border crisis on her district. Tensions rise as she confronts an individual who is physically blocking her path. She expresses frustration over being touched and insists on her right to move freely. The interaction becomes heated as she questions whether the individual is engaging with the Biden administration about border issues. Despite the confrontation, she maintains her focus on the pressing concerns affecting her constituents.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's Ocasio Cortez. Your yeah. So your district is really suffering under the the pressure of the border crisis. What? Why why are Don't I'm sorry.
Don't try to get through this floor, man. Don't touch me. What do you What? Your your your district is very much suffering for the border crime. Right?
Border crime. Why will you not no. You're out of my way. Excuse me, sir. Just go out of my way.
Get dude, fucking get your hands off me. What? You're going upstairs, man. Relax. Stop flaxing me.
Sir, are you talking to the Biden administration about about thank you, about fixing the border that you get off of me? What is wrong with you? You have to touch me on the stairs. Thank you. I did not touch you.
I have an old video.
@KelliKayK - 🇺🇸Kelli Kay🇺🇸
Now that Chuck Schumer is under investigation, let’s get Maxine Waters next for inciting violence and causing riots 😃 Who agrees? 🙋♀️ https://t.co/L95KLY2IR9
@bennyjohnson - Benny Johnson
🚨BREAKING: Rep. Maxine Waters and other Democrat Congress members are staging an insurrection at the Dept of Education over Trump and Elon Musk, but they’re getting the door slammed in their faces. https://t.co/4QbgT0ku1Z
Video Transcript AI Summary
Members of Congress are confronting private security blocking their access to the Department of Education. They question whether the security personnel were instructed to prevent them from entering. The Congress members emphasize their roles as elected representatives advocating for children, particularly those with disabilities, and express frustration over the lack of transparency and access. They highlight the contradiction of allowing billionaires into the building while denying entry to lawmakers. The situation escalates as they assert their right to advocate for the public and demand accountability from those in charge. The Congress members stress that they are not a threat and are simply trying to fulfill their responsibilities.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Do they know the way that people are moving?
Speaker 1: Max, ask the question again. That's important. Were you told are you making this decision to stand in front of this door on your own behalf, on behalf of Department of Education, or were you told to come out here and block numbers of content and write the dots? Dear minds are off.
Speaker 2: So everybody's What is that?
Speaker 3: We're doing our jobs.
Speaker 4: We're trying to say
Speaker 0: We're trying to say We're trying to say Show me your ID.
Speaker 1: Were you told to spam here, or did you decide to stand here and block members of Congress from other sources of education? Access.
Speaker 2: To federal well-being. Who says
Speaker 0: that you're not the private
Speaker 2: members of congress.
Speaker 0: Members of congress. Or maybe he doesn't understand. Do you
Speaker 2: not understand? Private security contractors is making the decision to block members of congress from asset from a public access entrance.
Speaker 3: I don't think he knows
Speaker 2: You have the authority as a private security contractor to block members of congress. That that that has been knighted and granted to you.
Speaker 3: I'm not sure
Speaker 0: if you have
Speaker 2: You have
Speaker 1: to at least let us go to the desk. Yeah.
Speaker 4: Okay. And when it goes to the
Speaker 0: desk, there's many different
Speaker 3: questions to change.
Speaker 4: Who told you to do this? Open the door. I see it now.
Speaker 0: So do you do you understand who members
Speaker 3: of congress are?
Speaker 0: I got it. Yeah.
Speaker 4: And you
Speaker 3: don't care. Huawei then.
Speaker 0: I got a job over there.
Speaker 3: You don't care. We have the job to do. We're not dangerous people. We're not I don't know. We're members of congress.
There are no thieves and thugs out here. We're members of congress. We're parents. We're teachers.
Speaker 0: Each in the bible
Speaker 2: says 400
Speaker 0: right now.
Speaker 1: You were elected to this. This is our job.
Speaker 0: This is our job. This is
Speaker 3: our job. We're doing our job.
Speaker 1: Oh, wow. You're securing this building against who?
Speaker 3: Members of congress. Members of congress. Who are you taking?
Speaker 2: The people. This is the beginning of full transparency of this administration. That's right. The administration that talked about they're gonna open the doors to all of the these things and and show the American public what is going on. Grants They won't even open the door to this building, to members of congress.
We are not posing any threat here. No. No. We are not dangerous people. We have not done any Let us try to request a meeting, and they won't they have a private security contractor who, on his own, is making decisions on behalf of the Department of Education.
Speaker 0: We are not at the partnership with Hayes, which is saying is they're not they allow billionaires and his minions to come in to this
Speaker 2: building. I don't know who he is, but I know who I am. And I'm a member of congress with oversight responsibilities trying to request a meeting, and a private security contractor is not allowing me to enter the building. And what do
Speaker 0: you say about billionaires go in this building but not the access representatives. They have all billionaires and their cronies still lying, but not there's a lack of transparency here. The members of congress, the people of representatives are not allowed in. This is not transparent.
Speaker 1: They're locking our kids down.
Speaker 3: Well, they not only are they not
Speaker 1: letting us sit, now they've called the Department of Homeland Security.
Speaker 3: We are members of Congress
Speaker 0: here to talk. We have a
Speaker 1: big Department of Education,
Speaker 3: and they're
Speaker 0: treating kids deserve to have a go away and fight for them.
Speaker 1: This is a calling.
Speaker 0: Children of this country deserve
Speaker 3: that,
Speaker 0: This is an economic institution. This is not Russia.
Speaker 4: Let the camera see him. Let the camera see him.
Speaker 1: What is
Speaker 4: he? This this man is a contractor.
Speaker 3: We are
Speaker 1: members of congress.
Speaker 3: Come in. They're blocking us.
Speaker 4: You see this man here who is a federal employee, he told us.
Speaker 3: No. He's not.
Speaker 4: Are you a federal employee?
Speaker 0: No. No.
Speaker 4: He said he's a federal employee. We pay him. We raise money to make sure that we have a department of education. Everybody that's hired at the department of education are here because we pay for them to be here. He's standing here today blocking the door, and he can't give us a good reason why he's blocking this door.
Speaker 1: Make sure they see right here all access entrance.
Speaker 3: Well, I think it should be clear to parents in The United States. If you wanna advocate on behalf of your children, you are not allowed to come into this building where you pay taxes. Parents who have children who are disabled, access is being blocked. You voted. You voted for members of congress to to advocate on behalf of your children, children with disabilities, for young women who have been victims of sexual assault in our classrooms, on our school grounds.
Members of OCR are fighting for your children. We are not not allowed in the building to talk to them. We are not allowed to advocate on behalf of America's children. America, we have a problem.
Speaker 4: Everybody stand back. Alright.
Speaker 2: So this is the Department of Education. You've got
@GuntherEagleman - Gunther Eagleman™
BREAKING: Democrats are trying to storm the Department of Education! Maxine Waters and Maxwell Frost are trying to force their way past the guards. At one point, Waters asks the guards if they have firearms and if they will shoot them. Is this an insurrection? https://t.co/WBN9bxD1uF
Video Transcript AI Summary
Members of Congress are being denied entry to the Department of Education by a private security contractor. They express frustration, stating they are elected representatives trying to advocate for their constituents, including children with disabilities. The security personnel claim they are following orders, but Congress members argue that they should have access to the building to fulfill their oversight responsibilities. They highlight the lack of transparency and accountability, noting that while they are blocked, billionaires can enter freely. The situation escalates as they call for attention to the issue, emphasizing the importance of their role in advocating for the public, particularly for vulnerable families.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Right now, you're looking live at the Department of Education, members of Congress. They're being denied entry into the building. The doors are locked. There's a security guard there. I'm guessing that's who's in the brown, tan looking shirt, but we don't know for sure.
They're having a tense conversation.
Speaker 1: Doing our job. We're trying to say
Speaker 0: Kinda wanna listen in for a second here.
Speaker 1: Show him your ID. Were you told to stand here, or did you decide to stand here and block members of Congress from Edison? Access.
Speaker 2: To the federal bill 19
Speaker 1: You said that you're out of my bedroom. Know. We're allowed in there.
Speaker 2: So a private security contractor.
Speaker 1: Do you do you
Speaker 2: understand. A private security contractor is making the decision to block members of congress from asset from a public access entrance. I don't think he knows. You have the authority as a private security contractor to block members of congress. That that that has been knighted and granted to you.
You have you have
Speaker 1: you have to at least let us go to the desk.
Speaker 3: Yeah. It's made a first month. Who told you to do this?
Speaker 1: Open the door. I see you. So do you do you understand who numbers are trying to do?
Speaker 3: We're we're we're we're we're
Speaker 1: we're then. In charge of it. You don't care. We have a block in there. We're not dangerous people.
We're not I don't know. Security, There are no thieves and thugs out here. We're members of congress. With identification. We're teachers.
Speaker 3: Each is the bible
Speaker 1: There's our ID. Hundred. Right there.
Speaker 2: You were elected.
Speaker 1: This is our job. I've never seen one. This is our job. We're doing our job.
Speaker 3: Oh, wow.
Speaker 1: You're securing this building against who? Members of Congress. Members of Congress. For all
Speaker 2: you protecting me, it's members of the temple So this is the beginning of full transparency of this administration. That's right. The administration that talked about they're gonna open the doors to all of the these things that have and show the American public what is going on. They don't even open the door to this building, to members of congress. We are not posing any threat here.
Now we are not dangerous people. We have not done anything. We're trying to request a meeting, and they won't they have a private security contractor who, on his own, is making decisions on behalf of the Department of Education.
Speaker 1: We are not being able to work. Hayes at the office. They allow billionaires and his minions to come in to these buildings?
Speaker 2: I don't know who he is, but I know who I am. And I'm a member of congress with oversight responsibilities trying to request a meeting, and a private security contractor is not allowing me to enter
Speaker 1: the bill. They're all billionaires going on building, but not the people's representatives.
Speaker 3: They're all billionaires
Speaker 1: and their cronies, they're lying, but not there's a lack of transparency here. Members of congress, the people's representatives are not allowed in. This is not transparent.
Speaker 2: They're locking our
Speaker 3: kids up. Yeah.
Speaker 1: Well, not only are they not letting us in, now they've called the Department of the Homeland Security. We are members of congress here at
Speaker 3: the top Really?
Speaker 2: The Department of Education, and they're treating
Speaker 1: The kids deserve to have a way to fight for them. That's a calling. Children of this country deserve that battle.
Speaker 3: This is a public institution.
Speaker 1: This is not Russia.
Speaker 3: Let the cameras see him. Let the cameras.
Speaker 1: Who is he? This this man right here. We are members of congress. Come in. They're blocking us.
Speaker 3: See this man here who is a federal employee, he told us.
Speaker 1: No. He's not.
Speaker 3: Are you a federal employee?
Speaker 1: No. Not us.
Speaker 3: No. He said he's a federal employee. We pay him. We raise money to make sure that we have a department of education. Everybody that's hired at the department of education are here because we pay for them to be here.
He's standing here today blocking the door, and he can't give us a good reason why he's blocking this door.
Speaker 1: Make sure they see right here all access entrance. Well, I think it should be clear to parents in The United States. If you wanna advocate on behalf of your children, you are not allowed to come into this building where you pay taxes. Parents who have children who are disabled, access is being blocked. You voted.
You voted for members of congress to to advocate on behalf of your children, children with disabilities, for young women who have been victims of sexual assault in our classrooms, on our school grounds. Members of OCR are fighting for your children. We are not allowed in the building to talk to them. We are not allowed to advocate on behalf of America's children. America, we have a problem.
Speaker 3: Now everybody stand back
Speaker 1: and let
Speaker 3: the cameras see. They're calling all of these gun loading people out on us.
Speaker 2: Right here.
Speaker 3: They're calling them out on us. Look look behind this door. Who do you see back there? The doors will open. Do they have guns on them?
Yes. Do they have guns? Weapons. Yes. Are they prepared to shoot us?
Yes. We want in. Door. How long it says on the door?
Speaker 1: All it says is it. Said all in. All in. Government.
Speaker 4: I'm a member of congress. I'm chair of the progressive caucus. I'm vice ranking member of the education committee, and the baseline responsibility of the congress is to oversee our federal agencies. Each and every one of us have been in this building and through these doors. But, of course, as soon as we get word that Elon Musk and Donald Trump wanna shut down the Department of Education, suddenly they don't wanna let members of congress in that ask questions.
Musk and the Republicans, they say they're supposedly about saving us money, bringing transparency, seeing where the dollars really go. No. They're the ones that lock the doors and make sure that your elected representatives can't even ask questions. We can't ask questions.
Speaker 3: That they're responsible for all of the student loans in this country?
Speaker 4: They I hear that they wanna cut those student loans and give them
Speaker 1: as tax cuts to their
Speaker 3: billionaire friends. And are they aware of title one where mothers are getting up going to work for minimum wages, and they cannot afford the education that the billionaires have for their children. And we tried to help them by giving money to this kind of person here and the people who work here, including all of the people in this country and those title one families who need some help, both in urban areas and rural areas and mothers who can't even afford the childcare that they need for their children while they're taking these jobs, making minimum wages. And we're helping them with title one, and this man is blocking the door. He says he's a federal employee.
He won't tell us who gave him permission to do this. All he knows is he's gonna stand here and tell the members of congress who are elected, who vote for the funding for all of them in this building and for the student loans and for the title one families. He's gonna tell us that we can't come in and talk with anybody.
Speaker 1: Is that right? Does this remind you of
Speaker 0: Alright. We are watching what is
Speaker 1: an an epic seat.
Speaker 0: We have members of congress
reSee.it AI Summary
I confronted Elizabeth Warren on her stance against DOGE and questioned her $12 million net worth from a $200K salary. Instead of answering, she reacted aggressively. It’s evident that politicians often evade real questions and rely on scripted responses. We must hold them accountable!
@nicksortor - Nick Sortor
🚨 #BREAKING: Elizabeth Warren just ASSAULTED me on camera for asking her WHY she’s so against DOGE & transparency Or maybe it was because I asked Pocahontas how she amassed a net worth of over $12 MILLION on a $200K government salary Either way, it’s clear these clowns are NOT able to answer questions. They’re only capable of spewing talking points fed to them by their handlers/lobbyist. HOLD THEM ACCOUNTABLE! We’re the media now.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Senator Warren, why the fear of transparency regarding Elon Musk's exposure of fraudulent spending? How did you accumulate a $12 million net worth on a congressional salary of $200,000? You keep trying to block my camera; this isn't a public sidewalk. You won't answer my questions. What's the problem with transparency, and why is Doge such a problem for you? You just elbowed me—I have it on camera. Transparency is your enemy.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The shutdown Senator Warren, why are you so afraid of transparency? Why are you bothered by the fact that Elon Musk is attempting to expose all of this fraudulent spending? What is that about? What is the problem here? What is the problem with transparent do not touch me.
Do not touch me. Senator Warren, I just wanna answer your question. How did you get a $12,000,000 net worth on a $200,000 salary in congress? Thank you. How did you do that?
Excuse me. How did you do that? You didn't keep trying to block my camera. We're not public sidewalk. So You know what the mean?
What are you? What are you? I'm sorry. So you don't wanna answer that question. What is it about Doge that's such a problem to you?
You just elbowed me, senator. I got that on camera. Us. Thank you. Transparency is your enemy.
@libsoftiktok - Libs of TikTok
Holy shlit. Elizabeth Warren just elbowed a citizen journalist for asking why she’s opposed to cutting government wasteful spending
reSee.it AI Summary
Maxine Waters and her team tried to take my phone twice after I questioned her stance on government transparency. She had no answers, and her reaction when I mentioned her taxpayer-funded SUV was unforgettable. We refuse to be silenced, no matter the intimidation tactics.
@nicksortor - Nick Sortor
🚨 #BREAKING: Maxine Waters and her entourage attempted to steal my phone TWICE after I asked her why she’s so against government transparency Democrats are VIOLENT. Of course, she had no answers, so the next step was to was to try to confiscate the device used to record her being frazzled and unable to answer questions. The look Maxine gave me when I mentioned her taxpayer funded SUV was PRICELESS 🤣 WE WILL NOT BE SILENCED. No matter how much they try to intimidate us.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Government transparency is essential. The use of taxpayer-funded vehicles, like large SUVs for members of Congress, raises questions. This lack of transparency fuels suspicion and distrust. Why are certain politicians against things like Dogecoin while enjoying these benefits? The core issue is the absence of clear explanations and accountability regarding government spending. We need to know who our representatives are and why they make the decisions they do. The lack of transparency surrounding these issues is unacceptable.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: She's gotta go get in her big black taxpayer funded SUV. Oh, yeah. That's what happens when you're a member of congress. No. That's what happens when you don't have transparency in the government.
Why do you deserve a big black taxpayer funded SUV? Is that why you're so against Doge? Is that what the problem is? What's up with the the lack of transparency in your What's the problem with transparency? Who the fuck are you?
Why are you push? What is the problem with those? What is the problem with this one?
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe Danielle Kurtzleben should have her White House clearance revoked after intentionally hitting Trump with a microphone. Many think she should be arrested for what appears to be simple or aggravated assault. This incident was clearly not an accident, and accountability is needed.
@DuneStarlight - Dune Starlight
Danielle Kurtzleben, the NPR 'journalist', who INTENTIONALY hit Trump in the face with a microphone should have her White House clearance revoked immediately. America thinks crazy NPR reporter needs to be arrested. Watched the video several times. this was at minimum simple assault if not aggrevated assault. This crazy Bitch needs to be held accountable. THIS WAS NO ACCIDENT.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims that the microphone could have been a weapon used against Donald Trump. They suggest the microphone could have contained a pathogen, anthrax, or fentanyl. The speaker states that President Trump could have been killed via the microphone.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hear many people saying, wait a second. This is a horrible threat to Donald Trump. There could be a pathogen on that microphone. It could have been turned into a physical weapon or a biological weapon. There could have been anthrax.
There could have been fentanyl. You could have killed president Trump here.
@TimRunsHisMouth - Tim Young
Jasmine Crockett assaulted a journalist. Charges need to be brought against her. Enough of this trash!
@sav_says_ - Savanah Hernandez
After lunging at a reporter, calling for Ted Cruz to be “knocked over the head hard” and calling Gov. Greg Abbott “hot wheels” Jasmin Crockett is now being protected by Captiol Police. Why are Capitol police shielding Crockett from journalists now? https://t.co/izhqjcT0JC
reSee.it AI Summary
I reported that Congresswoman Jasmine Crockett allegedly assaulted my DC correspondent, Charles Downs, on video. The Capitol Police have interviewed him, and the decision to press charges now lies with your office. We intend to pursue charges for assault, battery, and attempted theft against Crockett. Additionally, Charles has filed an ethics complaint with the Congressional Office of Ethics. We anticipate your investigation and believe that justice should prevail, as violence has no place in America.
@LauraLoomer - Laura Loomer
Hi @USAEdMartin @EagleEdMartin As you may have heard, Democrat Congresswoman @JasmineForUS Jasmine Crockett ASSAULTED my @LoomerUnleashed DC Correspondent @TheCharlesDowns on video. @CapitolPolice just formally interviewed Charles and said the decision to press charges now rests with your office as the US Attorney in the District of Columbia. We would like to press charges against Congresswoman Crockett for Assault, battery, and attempted theft. Charles also filed an official ethics complaint with the Congressional Office of Ethics. We look forward to your investigation. May justice prevail! Violence has no place in America!
@LauraLoomer - Laura Loomer
WATCH: @LoomerUnleashed @TheCharlesDowns just confronted Democrat Congresswoman Jasmine Crockett @RepJasmine and asked her why she’s running around with tax payer funded security when she’s the violent person who goes around physically attacking independent journalists. https://t.co/WTPS3tAdo1
Video Transcript AI Summary
Congresswoman Crockett is questioned about using taxpayer-funded private security. The questioner claims Crockett initiated physical contact and asks for an apology. Crockett does not respond or apologize.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Congresswoman Crockett, why are you running around with taxpayer funded private security when you're the one who hit me first? Would you like to apologize for your actions, congresswoman? You don't wanna apologize, congresswoman?
reSee.it AI Summary
I was shocked to hear that the DHS has confirmed potential arrests of Democrat members of Congress due to bodycam footage showing them allegedly assaulting law enforcement at an ICE facility in NJ. The DHS spokesperson indicated that more arrests could be forthcoming and mentioned a specific incident involving a female ICE officer being bodyslammed. The footage has since been released, supporting the DHS's claims, and I believe this should be a strong reason to proceed with arrests.
@EricLDaugh - Eric Daugherty
🚨 HOLY SHLIT: DHS CONFIRMS that the Democrat members of Congress MAY SOON BE ARRESTED because they have bodycam footage of the officials ASSAULTING law enforcement at the ICE facility in NJ... MAKE IT HAPPEN!! DHS SPOX: "There will likely be more arrests coming. We have bodycam footage of some of these members of Congress assaulting our ICE enforcement officers, including BODYSLAMMING a female ICE officer. We will be showing that to viewers very shortly." HOST: If you have that video, are you suggesting members of Congress will be arrested?" DHS: "That is definitely on the table."
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker states that more arrests are likely coming and that they have body camera footage of members of Congress assaulting ICE enforcement officers, including body slamming a female ICE officer. The speaker confirms there is a video of members of Congress body slamming ICE officials. When asked if members of Congress will be arrested, the speaker says it is an ongoing investigation and that is definitely on the table. ICE has the video, and it will be released very shortly.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We should, let viewers know there will likely be more arrests coming. We actually have body camera footage of some of these members of congress assaulting our ICE enforcement officers, including body slamming a female ICE off off officer. So we will be showing that to viewers very shortly.
Speaker 1: You say a video of members of Congress body slamming ICE
Speaker 0: That's correct.
Speaker 1: Officials?
Speaker 0: That's correct, sir. It's disgusting.
Speaker 1: Okay. And so if you have that video, are you suggesting that members of congress will be arrested who were there yesterday?
Speaker 0: This is an ongoing investigation and that is definitely on the table.
Speaker 1: Who has the video?
Speaker 0: ICE does, and we will be releasing that very shortly.
Speaker 1: Okay. Let's talk about
@EricLDaugh - Eric Daugherty
MORE: The footage HAS since come out, and it shows exactly what the DHS is saying. NOW USE THIS as a reason to arrest! https://t.co/Wmn0SIHmHN
@CollinRugg - Collin Rugg
JUST IN: Democrat Senator Alex Padilla arrested after being forcibly removed from DHS Secretary Kristi Noem’s press conference in Los Angeles. "I have questions for the secretary! ... Hands off!!" The Senator was arrested, according to MSNBC. https://t.co/CgxuFMA9GH
reSee.it AI Summary
I was taken aback when Senator Alex Padilla was arrested after confronting DHS Secretary Kristi Noem in Los Angeles. Noem mentioned she would reach out to Padilla for a conversation. Senator Chuck Schumer expressed his disgust at the "manhandling" and is demanding immediate answers.
@CollinRugg - Collin Rugg
Senator Alex Padilla taken to the ground while being arrested after confronting DHS Secretary Kristi Noem in Los Angeles. Wow. Noem later said she would reach out to Padilla and "try to have a conversation" with him. Senator Chuck Schumer says he is "sickened" by the "manhandling" and is demanding "immediate answers as to what the hell went on."
reSee.it AI Summary
I confronted Maxine Waters about her statements encouraging violence against ICE agents. During our exchange, she attempted to have someone call Capitol Police, but they supported me instead. One of her supporters chased me down and had a meltdown. Maxine tried to evade accountability by taking photos with her supporters, but I pressed her on key issues. She refused to condemn illegal immigrants receiving taxpayer-funded healthcare, rioters in Los Angeles, and assaults on ICE agents. It's frustrating that she can't answer these straightforward questions. Why do we pay her salary?
@nicksortor - Nick Sortor
🚨 BREAKING: I just confronted Maxine Waters about the LIES she’s spewing, and how she’s ENCOURAGING vioIence against ICE agents She then tried to have one of her goons call Capitol Police, but they sided with me 🤣 So the goon CHASED ME and MELTED DOWN. They can’t help themselves 😂 Ole Maxine tried to evade me by taking pictures with astroturfed supporters. Didn’t work. But here’s the rundown: ❌ She REFUSED to condemn illegals getting taxpayer funded healthcare ❌ She REFUSED to condemn rioters burning down Los Angeles ❌ She REFUSED to condemn assauIts on ICE agents These are SIMPLE QUESTIONS that she can’t even answer. Why the hell do we pay these people’s salaries anymore??!
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 1 questions a congresswoman about taxpayer-funded healthcare for undocumented immigrants and condemns violent riots in Los Angeles. Speaker 0 does not answer. Speaker 0 then challenges others to harass him as they allegedly harassed the congresswoman. Speaker 1 asks Speaker 0 to condemn the violent riots in Los Angeles. Speaker 0 declines to answer and asks who Speaker 1 is. Speaker 1 attempts to continue the conversation, but Speaker 0 walks away. Speaker 1 then asks Speaker 0 if he has a foreskin.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Harass me. Harass me. Dude, you tried to get the police on me. Between me. I just
Speaker 1: have to ask you. It seems like you're you're advocating for millions of illegals to be paid their their health could be paid for by tax payers. Is that is that wrong? Because your constituents are having to pay for the health insurance of millions illegals brought in by Joe Biden. Do do you condemn that?
Is that not a problem? No? Come on. It's a pretty easy question. You can you can you can you can condemn it.
You can say, yes. I do support it. I mean, your your Officer. Your lack of an answer oh, yeah. Call the police on me for asking a a a congresswoman a question.
That's exactly what you're doing. That's fine. No. It's okay. So so, I mean, can I can I get a quick answer to that question?
Quick answer to that question. Do you support illegals getting taxpayer funded health care?
Speaker 0: You're my hero. It's incredible. We pay
Speaker 1: these salaries.
Speaker 0: We pay the payers pay the salaries, and we can't even get an answer to the question. We're not gonna stay in the room.
Speaker 1: Say thank you. Thank you. You tried. You tried. But it's not it's not gonna work.
I'm gonna continue to ask questions, bud.
Speaker 0: In 4.
Speaker 1: We need 4. We
Speaker 0: need 4. Dude, you tried to call the police. What are you talking about? Just this
Speaker 1: is a yaw. It didn't work. Alright. Let's make the let's do a little bit of an easier one here at this point. How about condemning the violent riots in Los Angeles?
Are you willing to do that at least? I mean I mean, come on.
Speaker 0: We're we're we're we're we're talking about people that were
Speaker 1: setting buildings and cars on fire, assaulting ICE agents.
Speaker 0: We're trying to I want you to back up. Can we do that? I want you don't don't don't say anything.
Speaker 1: Alright. Condemn yeah. Don't say anything. Don't say anything. You're right.
That's probably not a good idea.
Speaker 0: Getting the flow.
Speaker 1: Okay. Alright. So alright. So not gonna condemn not gonna condemn the violent riots in Los Angeles. This is this is amazing.
This is the Democrat party.
Speaker 0: You know what? Don't impede the flow. I just harassed that lady. And all these Christian people here, now harass me the same way you just want. We can disagree, but harass me.
Harass me. Dude, you tried to get the police on between me and you, Harriet. I ain't afraid of you. So harass me the way you just had harass that lady. And your brother there that's laughing about it?
Harass me. No. No. No. No.
No. Bro, you know me. Coming down. Harass me. I dare you.
Harass me the way you just harassed her. You're the one that just chased me down bro. Harass me. You'll be okay. You'll be okay.
Be okay. You walking away. You keep walking with me.
Speaker 1: Are you on to? Delays.
Speaker 0: Harass me. Talking about? Just harassed that lady. How about you what are you even talking about? Question you want.
Just I don't know who you are. Why the fuck am I gonna talk to you? Who are you? The the way you harass me. Who are you?
Harass me the way you Are you going to tell me who you are,
Speaker 1: or you just gonna stand here and
Speaker 0: hang on. Okay. So we're
Speaker 1: not Alright. So this is going nowhere.
Speaker 0: I'll harass
Speaker 1: to keep walking with me if you want to.
Speaker 0: Alright. Okay. Well, you just ran
Speaker 1: from all the way over there. So assuming you
Speaker 0: you you you want me to see you leaving. Leaving. Okay. Are you gonna say anything productive?
Speaker 1: See who you are.
Speaker 0: So you're not gonna tell me who you are. I see you leave.
Speaker 1: Come with me. You just support channel Come with me, dude. You just ran, like, a 100 yards to come get me.
Speaker 0: Like, you can you can keep walking if you want to.
Speaker 1: You got no foreskin. I'm just waiting Do you have a foreskin, man? Wait. Wait.
@nicksortor - Nick Sortor
🚨 BREAKING: After an activist judge in DC REFUSED to jail Big Balls’ attackers, US Attorney Pirro announced she’ll be bringing FEDERAL CHARGES against them “Today… Lawrence Powell, 19, along with Anthony Taylor, 18, are now charged with assault” 🔥 https://t.co/QOj77G672z
Video Transcript AI Summary
Lawrence Cotton Powell, 19, and Anthony Taylor, 18, are charged with robbery and related offenses in a pair of connected incidents. Powell faces first-degree robbery (15 years), assault with intent to commit robbery (15 years), robbery for Edward Corristine (15 years), assault with intent to commit robbery (15 years), and attempted carjacking (5 years). Taylor faces the same set of charges as Powell.
The case begins with Powell allegedly stomping on Levine’s head during an assault in which Levine was robbed of sneakers and a watch after being knocked down; the crowd chased Levine, he got up briefly, then was attacked again on the ground.
Minutes later, the group approached Edward Corristine, a 19-year-old Doge person working in administration, who was walking a young woman to her car on the 1400 Block of Swan Street Northwest. Approximately 10 suspects attacked him, and he pushed the young woman into the car to protect her. Corristine was punched repeatedly and taken to the ground; the suspects demanded the car from the woman in the car and tried to open the locked door, banging on the car and pulling at the door. A Metropolitan Police Department officer on patrol arrived and witnessed the assault on Corristine, who was on the ground beside the car. The juveniles fled, and within a short period, two 15-year-olds were arrested and taken into the family court by the attorney general’s office.
Powell’s background is highlighted: On April 3, Powell was sentenced for felony attempted robbery. The office asked for jail time, but Judge McClain, in Superior Court, with no criminal background, gave Powell probation despite the felony conviction. By May 4, Powell was rearrested while on probation for simple assault and possession of a prohibited weapon. The office again asked for probation revocation. On May 16, Judge McClain released Powell again, telling him to be a good boy. On July 24, Powell was sentenced on one of the two misdemeanors he faced; the office again sought jail time after further victimization. On July 25, another judge suspended his sentence and placed him on probation. Within ten days, Powell was involved again with Levine and Corristine.
The co-defendant, Anthony Taylor, is from Maryland, 18 years old; the office is unaware of any history for him.
Attorney General’s office commends the Metropolitan Police Department for their hard work and diligence in handling the case.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Them. Today, we are announcing that Lawrence Cotton Powell, who is 19 years of age, along with Anthony Taylor, who is 18 years of age, are now charged with assaulting Levine. Cotton Powell was stomping on Levine's head. As you can see in this poster to my left, Levine was able to get up momentarily, but the crowd chased him and got him down again. They continued to attack Levine while he was on the ground, and then proceeded to rob him of his sneakers and, his watch.
The group then, after the robbery and assault of Ethan Levine, they walked in the direction of where another crime occurred within minutes. You have heard of this crime. Edward Corristine, a 19 year old Doge person who was working in the administration, was walking a young woman to her car when he was approached in the 1400 Block Of Swan Street Northwest. Approximately 10 suspects approached him, and as they did, he pushed the young woman into the car that and he was protecting her from the group before he was then attacked by multiple suspects who then punched him repeatedly causing significant injuries to him. They got him on the ground.
And as they were doing so, they demanded the car from the woman who was inside the car and had already locked the car. They were banging on the car. They were pulling the car door, trying to get the car open, and were telling the woman in the car to hand over the keys. And the woman was, as I said, able to lock the car door, so they were unable to gain entry. And it was fortuitous that someone from the Metropolitan Police Department was on patrol.
He happened to pull onto the block, and he witnessed the suspects actually assaulting Coracine who was on the ground lying next to the car. The juveniles fled, but within a short period of time, two 15 year olds were arrested, and they were taken into the family court by the attorney general's office. That is the local attorney general's office. Now I think what's significant about this case is a history of Lawrence Cotton Powell. I want you to I want you to follow me on this.
Lawrence Cotton Powell is 19 years of age. He's now charged with robbery, first degree robbery, for which he faces fifteen years in prison. He also faces a charge of assault with intent to commit robbery in another fifteen years and robbery for Edward Corstein, fifteen years, assault with intent to commit robbery, another fifteen years, and attempted carjacking, five years. Now let me tell you his background. On April 3, Lawrence Cotton Powell was sentenced for a felony attempted robbery.
My office asked for jail time. Judge McClain, a judge sitting in the criminal part in Superior Court with no criminal background, made a decision to give Cotton Powell probation in spite of his conviction on a felony attempted robbery. Within thirty one days, by May 4, Powell reoffends. He's rearrested while he's on probation from the felony, and he's charged with simple assault and possession of a prohibited weapon b. On May 4, my office asked that probation be revoked.
But on May 16, that same judge McClain comes back and releases Cotton Powell and tells him, basically, be a good boy. On July 24, he is sentenced to one of the two misdemeanors that he's charged with. Again, my office asked for jail time after he victimized yet another person. And on July 25, another judge suspends his sentence and decides that he should be on probation. So after a felony of attempted robbery conviction, after a violation of probation, after a second crime, after a second conviction, after no compliance with c Sosa, the judges say do better, and they let him go.
And guess what? Within ten days, he's at it again with Ethan Levine and Edward Corstein. Now the codefendant in this case is is an individual by the name of Anthony Taylor. He charged also with the same arrest. He is from with the same crimes.
He is from Maryland. He is 18 years old. We are unaware of any any history as it relates to him. I wanna thank the Metropolitan Police Department. I wanna thank the fact that this department went above and beyond and worked incredibly hard.
@MilaLovesJoe - Mila Joy
Journalist is filming the front of a local Homeland Security (DHS) office. The Director comes out & goes BALLASTIC at being filmed & ASSAULTS the journalist. Cops called. Cop SCARED of arresting someone from DHS. Detectives called… Will he finally get arrested? https://t.co/vhkEKaENff
Video Transcript AI Summary
The exchange centers on a confrontation in a public/Louisiana parish building during a first amendment audit conducted by Justin (Speaker 0). Justin explains that he entered a public area and was subjected to aggressive behavior from a man who grabbed his belongings, attempted a headlock, and threw Justin’s phone. Justin asserts that this occurred in front of a deputy, who did not intervene. He claims the man (Ellis Booth) took his phone, assaulted him, and tossed it across the parking lot, while the deputy “did nothing.”
Justin emphasizes that he was having a polite conversation when Booth acted aggressively, grabbed his property, and threw his phone multiple times. He argues that if he had done any of these actions, he would be in cuffs, and he questions why Booth has not been arrested. He challenges the deputy’s handling of the incident, insisting that the deputy witnessed the events and should have acted. He also claims the deputy’s inaction contradicts the duty to protect the public and enforce the law, noting he has a large social media following and intends to publicize what he perceives as misconduct.
The dialogue includes several attempts to obtain formal statements and to follow proper procedure. Justin asks for a statement from the deputy who witnessed the incident, and for access to video footage (body cam) and other evidence. He asserts that the deputy’s eyewitness account should be sufficient to pursue charges, and he questions why extra steps or warrants are being pursued if the deputy clearly witnessed the events. He also mentions he has filed a Freedom of Information Act request for the body cam footage.
Speaker 4, Detective Adams of the Cattle Parish Sheriff’s Office, enters the conversation and tries to mediate. He explains that a new process is necessary: a written statement and a signed affidavit from Justin before any warrants or arrests can proceed, since there is no direct on-site arrest of Booth by the acting officer. Detective Adams clarifies that if a judge signs a warrant based on the deputy’s statements and Justin’s signed affidavit, Booth could be arrested. He notes that the deputy did not witness the exact moment of the phone being thrown in Justin’s hands, but did witness the assault and the destruction of property. He emphasizes following chain-of-command and needing a judge’s warrant to proceed.
The discussion includes comparisons of how officers would be treated if the roles were reversed. Justin argues that the officer’s standards should be the same regardless of whether the person is a private citizen or a Homeland Security employee. Detective Adams explains that the Homeland Security director (Beeson) was not present to arrest on-site and that Booth’s arrest is tied to the body camera and the deputy’s written report. The exchange touches on past incidents, including a controversial encounter involving a black officer and other officers, which Detective Adams says he plans to address separately with superiors.
Towards the end, it is confirmed that Booth was arrested previously (yesterday) for simple battery and criminal damage to private property, but the battery charge was kept separate from the damage charge after Justin notes his phone’s condition. Booth bonded out at $1,255 cash and would have a court date set by the district attorney. The district attorney asks Justin to forward any video and his written statement. Detective Adams states he will present the materials to a judge, and if a warrant is signed, Booth will be arrested. Beeson is identified as the online security director who previously attended the incident, and there is a discussion about obtaining more video and verifying all witnesses’ statements.
In sum, the transcript captures Justin’s allegation of police inaction during a visible assault and property destruction, the procedural requirement for statements and affidavits to pursue warrants, and the subsequent administrative steps that led to Booth’s prior arrest and ongoing cooperation with the district attorney’s office.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: See?
Speaker 1: This is a secure building outside.
Speaker 0: It's not, sir. Outside. See? This is what
Speaker 1: I do not touch me.
Speaker 0: Do not touch me.
Speaker 1: Did you ask to come in this building?
Speaker 0: I don't have
Speaker 1: to. It's a public area. A secure building.
Speaker 0: She asked me a question, and I was answering her. We didn't
Speaker 1: know what
Speaker 0: This is what I was talking about. Get out of my face.
Speaker 2: You just lost it.
Speaker 0: Get out of
Speaker 1: face. Right now.
Speaker 0: Dude, are you gonna no. You you just saw him assault me and break my stuff and take my stuff and throw it? You need to take care of this, deputy. No. I I follow the law.
He doesn't.
Speaker 1: I follow the law. My
Speaker 0: attention. My whole job is to follow the law. I know what I'm doing.
Speaker 1: Alright. My my job is
Speaker 0: Deputy, are what's your name, sir? Deputy. Please please deescalate him.
Speaker 1: I'm I'm gonna
Speaker 0: Get him out of my face now.
Speaker 1: What did you
Speaker 0: I had I had I had every right to knock the shit out of you back there.
Speaker 1: You had all rights? Yeah.
Speaker 0: You you tried to put me in a headlock. You took my stuff. What did Dude, I was having a polite conversation.
Speaker 1: Office. That is a fair
Speaker 0: Deescalate him. He is losing his shit. He's about to lose his job. I guarantee you.
Speaker 1: I I knew
Speaker 0: Enjoy your last week here, bro.
Speaker 1: When you stay in my office, that is just
Speaker 0: Enjoy your last week here. Good. I get cops fired all the time because good cops love me and bad cops hate me. Deputy, need to speak with you, sir, please. This is a multiple purpose building, and those ladies invited me in.
We're having a very nice conversation. My door. Yes, sir. Yes, buddy. You're right.
Brother, I promise there was no he's the only person starting anything with me all day. If you wanna see any video, I'll show it to you in a heartbeat.
Speaker 3: And then
Speaker 0: he just came detective. And took my stuff. You saw it, dude. I'm gonna let them know what happened. He did the same thing inside before I came out.
He did it twice. You need to like, if I did that to him, where would I be right now? In cuffs in the back of your car. So why isn't he? He's Why isn't he?
Speaker 1: He's inside.
Speaker 2: No. He needs
Speaker 1: to be
Speaker 0: in the cuffs in the back
Speaker 4: of your car.
Speaker 0: I understand that. So this isn't fair treatment. That's why I've no. That's why I've got my detectives over here. What chief detective What would you have done if I had done that to him?
Be be honest. He grabbed your phone. That was it. And threw your phone. That was it.
No. He put me in a headlock inside also. It's on camera. Well, grabbing my phone and throwing it, it's assault and battery. And and But did he hit you with it?
And theft. No. Touching me at all, brother. Assault is just I don't even have to touch you. I'd have to threaten you with being touched, and that's assault.
When you touch me, it's battery. And then you can add on, he took my phone from me and threw it. Right. Now it's destruction of property, the theft, you name it. If I did any of those to you right now, what would happen to me?
I mean. Be honest. Just be honest. It's it's I would go to jail.
Speaker 4: I've got
Speaker 0: them coming over here. Dude, just do your job. Arrest him like you fucking would me. Alright. Right now, I'm gonna collect the statement from you.
Dude, I'm not even gonna talk to you if you're not gonna do what you what's right. If you're not gonna do what's right, I'm not talking to you. Because if you're just gonna try to get my information and then go tell him, no. Call. I have to grab a statement from you of what happened.
You don't have to I I did not I don't have to say anything. Okay. You want charges pressed? You saw it. Yes.
I know. Okay. So for what you saw in your presence, act on it. You don't need a statement to what you saw with your own eyes. I did not see him physically hit you.
You saw him take the phone. Okay. But there's there's
Speaker 4: a procedure.
Speaker 0: Do what with what you saw. Not what you didn't see. What you saw. Okay. But there's a procedure I have to follow.
You wouldn't have followed it. If there's other way around, I'd be in cuffs right now. I still have to get a statement from I wouldn't be in cuffs. If you if you just Bro, just answer the question. Would I be in cuffs?
Just answer it. At this point, no. Because
Speaker 1: I wouldn't. See what happened
Speaker 0: to took his phone and threw it across the parking lot, you no problem. I'll get a statement. I mean Do not tell me that. That's a lie. I have to give this you're not a good cop.
You're a bad cop. Okay. You're a bad person, dude. You need to rethink what you're doing.
Speaker 1: Okay. I'm post certified.
Speaker 0: I'm older. No. You don't. You no. I'm doing my You take his side over the public.
Speaker 1: No. I'm trying trying to
Speaker 0: You're supposed to protect the public, not Homeland Security.
Speaker 1: I am.
Speaker 0: You are You're not protecting dude, you just saw a crime and you're doing nothing about it. And you're about to be all over the Internet doing nothing about it. I have a lot of subscribers. A lot. And they're all gonna see you doing nothing about it.
Okay. And you're probably gonna lose your job too. I'm gonna make
Speaker 2: sure you lose your job too. How about that? Okay.
Speaker 0: Go in there and arrest him and do your do the right job. That's why I have my chief detective Why can't you? Are you a cop? I thought you knew what you were doing. You do or don't know what you're doing?
I do know what you're doing. Well, then go arrest him. Why do you need someone else? Why do you need anybody else? You just saw it in front of your own eyes.
He didn't see it with his own eyes. You did. So go do something, and then I'll talk to you. I don't trust y'all. I don't trust y'all.
Who are you? Who are you? I'm the chief detective. I'm only gonna talk to you if you're gonna do the right thing.
Speaker 5: Sure. Well, one of your guys just came in. We were talking to him. He come got a complaint form. We were trying to get all that for him.
Speaker 0: Alright. So I was just trying to make a public record request. I was told to go do that in that in this building by, like, half a dozen people. I walk in there. The lady at the front desk says, you'll need to do that in the Homeland Security office down at the right.
So I go down the hallway on the right, look inside the office, no one's in there, come back out. The ladies are like, hey, what are you doing with the camera? I'm just explaining, have you ever heard of a first name in audit?
Speaker 5: Sure. Yes.
Speaker 0: That's literally what I'm doing. Yeah. He comes in there, puts me in a headlock, takes my phone out of my out of my hand, throws it on the ground. I have to wrestle my phone out of his hand, then he follows me outside right in front of your deputy, takes my phone out of my hand again, and throws it across the parking lot. And guess what your deputy did?
Nothing.
Speaker 5: Okay. Let me go over and get some paperwork. Let me go over there.
Speaker 0: Thank you.
Speaker 5: Steve, where where do you feel comfortable talking to giving me a statement?
Speaker 0: So I'm not gonna I'm not gonna talk unless so that deputy with his own eyes witnessed more than enough to arrest him. If you're gonna do the right thing, I'll come talk to you and tell you everything that happened. I'll show you videos.
Speaker 5: That's what
Speaker 0: we're doing. If you're not doing well If if you will give it to me, I would like to have your footage for the evidence. And I will. But but before I do anything, because I've been through this road before and I know how cops work, is you're gonna get all the information you can out of me and then tell me to get fucked. No.
No. That's not Well and so with before I even make a statement or even show you a video with what that deputy saw with his own eyes is more than enough.
Speaker 5: To him too.
Speaker 0: So if if you do the right thing with what he saw alone, then we'll talk.
Speaker 5: Yeah. Let me go talk to you.
Speaker 0: Thank you. And can I get your name, sir?
Speaker 5: So Duane Lester.
Speaker 0: I'm Justin.
Speaker 5: Okay. We're trying to make this right that he's not way superior. He's not don't
Speaker 0: work for break the law, though.
Speaker 1: I agree. Agree.
Speaker 0: And he needs to go to jail just like I would.
Speaker 5: And I'm not I'm not saying that that ain't gonna happen. I'm just letting you know that he don't work for us.
Speaker 0: I understand that. And and, actually, that makes it better because if he did work for you, you would just give him he wouldn't he definitely wouldn't go to jail, but he's not even your department. So you can act on it.
Speaker 5: Yeah. I'm gonna talk to the deputy and see what he's got on. Maybe he's got a body cam. Can watch or something.
Speaker 0: I mean, his own I would you call him a liar or because he saw it with his own eyes, he could just tell you. He saw
Speaker 5: Oh, yeah. I'm just asking.
Speaker 0: He saw him do that
Speaker 2: to me.
Speaker 5: That my damn show to me so I could see it.
Speaker 0: Like, if I if I if I ran up and grabbed your phone out of your pocket and threw it, what happens to me?
Speaker 5: Sure. I I I
Speaker 0: And that's only one of, like, 10 things that happened. Yeah. But that just that alone, what would happen?
Speaker 5: Well, I mean, at at a minimum, it could be he took your phone. And
Speaker 0: threw it. Yeah. No. What if I did that to you? What would happen to me?
Speaker 1: You probably got jailed.
Speaker 5: Thank you.
Speaker 0: I mean,
Speaker 5: likely, it's according to the yeah. That's what saying. I'm only
Speaker 0: Well, was this whole story. It's a lot worse than that, but that alone would take him take me to jail. So let's do it to him.
Speaker 4: Well,
Speaker 0: he needs to
Speaker 5: see what's happening here.
Speaker 0: Do you believe that an a law officer has a higher standard or a lower standard that they need to operate on? You think that they should
Speaker 5: I I 100% agree that
Speaker 0: Higher standard? Standard. Okay. So then He's
Speaker 5: not a law officer. So
Speaker 0: Alright. Well, then even better then take him, dude. Who's asking?
Speaker 4: Detective Adams with the Kettleman Parish Sheriff's Office.
Speaker 0: Oh, the scumbags. Yeah. What's going on, dude?
Speaker 4: Okay. Let me go ahead and stop you right there, mister McKenney. I'm trying to work this case, but I'm not gonna tolerate you insulting me. I'm not gonna insult you.
Speaker 0: Unless you are
Speaker 4: tolerate any other board. Hey, dude. Trying to help.
Speaker 2: You're not, though. If you that line Hey. Let's let's stop. Okay? Did you arrest Ellis Booth yesterday?
Speaker 4: That's the reason for my call. I need a statement from you.
Speaker 2: No. You don't. And that's why I'm calling you names. That's why I'm calling you names, dude. You witnessed several
Speaker 3: crimes.
Speaker 4: No. I did not.
Speaker 2: Your officer did. Your officer did.
Speaker 4: I have a statement from that officer.
Speaker 0: That's all
Speaker 1: you need. He witnessed.
Speaker 2: If you arrest him, I'll cooperate. Just like I told you yesterday, Until you do the right thing, I don't trust you. And I have a very good reason to not trust you because you didn't do anything when the officer saw it with his own eyes. Do the right thing, then I'll cooperate. Until then, I don't trust you for a very good reason.
Speaker 4: So are you gonna write a statement and sign an affidavit
Speaker 2: or Not unless you do the right thing because what I'm gonna do actually is I've already spoken to my lawyer, and your department's about to be on the hook, dude. You guys, that's dereliction of duty. That's not honoring your oath. You're gonna be named in the lawsuit. I'm not fucking around.
Do the right thing.
Speaker 4: I'm not either.
Speaker 0: You don't you don't
Speaker 2: need me. You don't need me to make the arrest. You don't need me. You need what your officer saw and the body cam and everything. Your officer's statement is more than enough to make the arrest.
You decided not to when you had more than enough. Whenever you and him both admitted, had he seen me do the same thing, I'd already be in jail. So why isn't he? Why isn't he?
Speaker 4: My first conversation with you. I have not talked to you. I haven't
Speaker 2: seen you. Well, the head okay. There was a dude yesterday that said he was the head detective. And so I said, will you please go do the right thing? If you're admitting that if I did that to anyone here, I'd be in jail.
Why isn't he? And they said, well, he's Homeland Security. Like, that makes him immune from the law. And I said, I'll make a statement. I will fully cooperate with you guys if you do the right thing, but I don't trust that you will.
I know how you work. You want all my information. That way, you can just tell me to off and nothing happens. I've seen this go I've seen this a 100 times. If I can see that you actually want to do the right thing, then I'll cooperate.
But there's no point in me cooperating with a bunch of crooks. I even heard you guys talking yesterday about what you could charge me with. Why would you why was that even a fucking conversation?
Speaker 4: I don't know. I was not there. I didn't hear that conversation.
Speaker 2: So why are you the one talking to me? Why are you the one calling me
Speaker 3: right now then? You weren't
Speaker 2: even there, dude. This is what I'm talking about.
Speaker 4: Are you gonna let me speak for a minute?
Speaker 2: Yeah, man.
Speaker 3: I'm sorry. Go ahead.
Speaker 4: Okay. The officer that was there yesterday left today going on vacation for a scheduled event. It wasn't because of this. The sheriff is gone. It's LSA conference is what it is.
Okay? With that said, I've been left to try to sort this out. I've got a statement from mister Boo saying you attacked him. That's why I need a statement from you telling your side of what happened. The way that I do this is I present this to a judge, and if a judge signs a warrant for, number one, simple battery on you.
Number two, destruction of your private property by throwing the phone across the parking lot as the deputy stated in his written statement, his report, then I will if the judge signs the warrant, I will arrest mister Booth. There is no bearing. I don't care if he's on the security or
Speaker 3: Dude, your entire department.
Speaker 4: Nothing to do with me.
Speaker 2: You have enough to arrest him on what your witness on what your officer witnessed. What happened before that is quite frankly irrelevant even though he attacked me. And if you got statements from the two ladies inside, unless they're lying, which I don't they don't seem like the type, they'll vouch that he attacked me.
Speaker 4: So when you say the two ladies in the office, that's the little brick building across the road by the White church or is that the court building? Which so I'll know which two ladies to talk to.
Speaker 3: So you're I do not
Speaker 4: have statements from them is what I'm saying.
Speaker 3: What? So this is your department, dude. This is your department. How did they not get statements from them yesterday? So, dude, that's embarrassing.
But it's
Speaker 2: the listen. I'm gonna talk I'm gonna tell you what happened, but I'm not I'm I just don't trust you guys.
Speaker 4: That's not I want it that day. I don't. Can earn the trust I will, but I don't I deal with that. I need you to tell me what happened or either give me something in writing
Speaker 0: This is that
Speaker 4: I can receive.
Speaker 2: I I'll tell you what happened. I was there doing
Speaker 3: a first amendment audit. Have you ever heard of that, sir?
Speaker 4: I'm very familiar with
Speaker 3: that.
Speaker 4: Okay. And how it works.
Speaker 0: But I
Speaker 3: haven't even gotten to a building yet. And he is picking a fight with me where I'm having to back up away from him. He's he's a completely unhinged insane person. And I'm and I'm like, look, dude.
Speaker 4: I agree with that.
Speaker 3: You agree? Okay. Thank you.
Speaker 4: I agree with that.
Speaker 3: Yeah. He really is. So I walk in the front office. The lady in the front has nothing to do with him, but
Speaker 2: I I don't know that at
Speaker 3: the time. I asked her about it, and she says, yeah. His office is the last office down there on the right. Go down there and see if he's in there. So I walked down the public hallway, go to his door.
It's wide open. I don't step even my toes inside his doorway. I'm outside of his door frame the entire time. I'm looking inside his
Speaker 4: within your right's doing that.
Speaker 3: Thank you for understanding that. What do you think your deputy should've done in that moment when he sees this man grab my stuff try to grab me, then grab my stuff, and throw it?
Speaker 4: They should have arrested him for a simple battery and a criminal name, mister Frank.
Speaker 3: Alright. Well, he didn't even think about it.
Speaker 4: With that said, the reason that I called you was see if I could do the right thing on this, but I've already told you that I need a written statement a signed affidavit before I can
Speaker 3: go further. No. You don't. With what your your deputy saw with his own eyes is enough to do something. You admitted just a second ago, what would what what should that have deputy have done?
You said arrested him. Okay. Go for it, bro. So don't don't go back on your word.
Speaker 4: What I have.
Speaker 3: The brother, you just told me ten seconds ago, and I'm recording this, that he should have arrested him.
Speaker 4: I am not afraid of your attorney. I'm not afraid of being recorded. Recorded.
Speaker 3: I can see that.
Speaker 4: I'm trying to tell you I will do my job, but I've gotta have something to do
Speaker 3: it with you. You don't, dude.
Speaker 4: I will present listen just a second. Let me tell you what I'm gonna do. I will present what I have to a judge. And if a judge says he will sign a warrant on this, I'll arrest mister Booth. I do not have a problem with that.
But a little bit of cooperation and less sarcasm on your part would go a long way with me.
Speaker 3: It's not sarcasm, dude. I'm I don't trust you. That's not I'm not being sarcastic.
Speaker 4: Word out of your mouth whenever you answer me on the phone and tell I tell you I identify myself as a detective with the Cattles Parish Sheriff's Office and the next word out of your mouth is scumbag Yeah. That's pretty derogatory to me. I make offense to that.
Speaker 3: Okay. I don't consider myself
Speaker 4: a scumbag. I consider myself a
Speaker 3: fair Mhmm.
Speaker 4: I try to do my job to the best of my ability. Did we not do exactly what we may have should have done yesterday? I can't do anything about yesterday. I'm trying to make it
Speaker 3: right yesterday. You're still not. And You're you're
Speaker 4: bent on trying to insult me and this
Speaker 3: Well, listen. When you first called no.
Speaker 4: But I did.
Speaker 3: When you first called, I thought you were the detective I spoke with yesterday. Okay? I don't I didn't okay? And he is a scumbag, and I'll call that to him all day long. Okay?
So that's why I called you that. I thought you were him. So I apologize for calling your name. I've never even met you. But your department is still a stumbag.
Speaker 4: Seen me. I didn't see you yesterday. All of this was over by
Speaker 0: the time I got
Speaker 3: involved. But but guess what? You admitted just a minute ago that you wouldn't need a warrant to arrest him and that your officer should have done that yesterday.
Speaker 4: I stand by that. He should have arrested mister Booth yesterday.
Speaker 3: So you don't need a warrant, and you wouldn't have needed a warrant to arrest me. So why are we doing this? Just go get him, dude. Do your job, please. I'm begging you.
Speaker 4: I told you. I'm gonna present what I've got to
Speaker 3: a judge, and
Speaker 0: it's You're doing
Speaker 4: sign on my side.
Speaker 3: You okay. Why are you treating him special like this? Be real. You wouldn't do this to if this was me, you wouldn't be doing this. You would have already got me.
Speaker 4: I don't think we can get any further. We're not gonna agree on that.
Speaker 3: So respectfully, you wouldn't need a warrant to arrest me. Right? If I had done that to anyone there, you would not be
Speaker 4: I saw what happened.
Speaker 3: Okay.
Speaker 4: I did not see it happen.
Speaker 3: Well, your officer did. And let's just say your officer came to you and said, he saw me do this. You wouldn't need a warrant to arrest me. So why do you why are you going through all these extra hoops and steps for mister Booth?
Speaker 4: Because I did not see it. The officer saw it.
Speaker 3: Okay. Please stop deflecting. Sir. Sir. You're literally
Speaker 4: contrary to what you're saying.
Speaker 3: You are deflecting. It's not contrary. You're deflecting. It's not contrary to what the officer said. And as I just said, what you you would not need a warrant to arrest me.
You admit that the officer would have that you could arrest me for any of this. You are definitely 100% going through extra steps for him that you wouldn't do for me or anyone else.
Speaker 4: No. I'm not.
Speaker 3: You okay. You're so you would do the same thing. So if if your officer came and told you that he saw me grab someone's phone and throw it, you'd say, well, we we better get a warrant first.
Speaker 4: No. And he should have arrested me on the spot.
Speaker 3: Okay. That no. Answer the question. Don't deflect to a different question. The question is, if that same officer came to you and said that he saw me grab mister Booth's phone and throw it, he saw it.
It's on camera, on his body cam. He he's the witness. Do you are you gonna go get a warrant for me, or you're just gonna arrest me?
Speaker 4: My next question to that officer would be why don't you why didn't you arrest him? I do not have a problem arresting him. If I have some enough probable cause and a signed affidavit and a voluntary statement from you.
Speaker 3: Well, you just got a statement.
Speaker 4: Signature on a warrant.
Speaker 3: You just got a statement from me, sir. I just I just told you everything.
Speaker 4: Well, if you'll sign a voluntary statement and an affidavit at this point, I don't have a complaint in the computer from you.
Speaker 3: You don't need a complaint. You're dude, why can't you get this? Your officer witnessed three crimes. So unless you don't believe unless he is he on the Brady list or something? Like, why don't you believe what he says?
Go do it. Why are you why is it why are you gonna take my word over your own officers?
Speaker 4: I'm gonna call my boss who is the sheriff. And if he tells me to proceed with this
Speaker 3: Gotcha. Idea,
Speaker 4: I'll do what I need to do.
Speaker 3: Extra steps.
Speaker 4: And if not, then
Speaker 3: Extra steps.
Speaker 4: I'm follow my chain of command.
Speaker 3: No, dude. Just do the right thing. Why do you why are you putting these extra steps on for Booth that you would not do for anyone else? You're proving my point.
Speaker 4: It's not just for Booth.
Speaker 0: It is.
Speaker 3: Way we do things No. It's not, dude. I do this for a living. I know how you work. I know when you the only time you ever go through all these hoops is whenever it's one of your own.
I see I see this is literally what I do twenty four seven. I I know you guys better than you know yourselves. The only time you do these freaking extra steps and hoops and special treatment is when it's one of your own. If it was some some drug addict down the street, you wouldn't ask anybody.
Speaker 4: Yes, sir. Called to let you know that been arrested and booked into the jail on 07/2825 at 01:09.
Speaker 0: Okay. So you alright. Thank you so much, dude. Hold on one second. And so you arrested him yesterday.
Did you go what was the charges?
Speaker 4: Charge of simple battery. I did simple battery and criminal damage to private property, but you told me your phone was not damaged. So I took that charge off of the affidavit.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Man, my OtterBox I swear by the OtterBox now. This thing is barely scratched. Doubt. Yeah.
Speaker 4: I don't leave out of the store without one. It's just they pay for themselves.
Speaker 0: I was like, there's no way it's not shattered, but it didn't even have a scratch. So okay. So he was arrested for battery. Did he bond out or anything?
Speaker 4: He he did bond out. Yes. It was 1,255 cash bond, so he's bonded out probably back at work today. I told you I was gonna do my job. That's what I did.
It's in the district attorney's hands now. But he'll be issued a court date, and I don't know that date or I will give it to you, but I can notify you. You should get a letter from the DA. I actually spoke to the district attorney today, and, he asked that you forward me any video that you had and a written statement, you know, stating your side of what happened.
Speaker 1: Did you get
Speaker 4: Outside the office.
Speaker 0: Okay. I sent an email with a statement. Did you get that? And can I make a Freedom of Information Act request? Sure.
I wanted the body cam. Okay. Actually, what's the officer's name that witnessed all this?
Speaker 4: William Beeson.
Speaker 0: Is he getting any kind of any kind of reprimand or anything?
Speaker 4: I have not discussed it with his cap his patrol captain, but I will.
Speaker 0: Would I be able to get the body cam for the arrest?
Speaker 4: No. He he walked into the office. Here I I don't know if you know his role and all this. He is the online security director for the parish. He walks in and out of dispatch periodically.
And when he walked in dispatch, I had already delivered the warrants down there, and he was out of town as a reason. He wasn't arrested on-site. But whenever he came back to town, he was to report to his supervisor, which is the parish police jury secretary, and he was going to be booked in then. He he didn't go to her office. He went straight to dispatch, and that's whenever they told him, hey.
We have a warrant for your arrest, and they booked him in. That's where that went. Just kinda got off to a bad start. Like I told you, I'm an open book. I have nothing to hide.
I believe in doing my job, and I believe in justice. So you know?
Speaker 0: Thank you, man. Yeah. I I I honestly did not expect anything to happen, especially after your chief investigator didn't do anything.
Speaker 4: And I I'm not trying to jump in their defense. There's more here that don't, and I'm I'm gonna ask you about it before we don't know. But him being the Homeland Safety Director, the the officer base and that was on the scene, I understand his part. He didn't know if he actually had the power to arrest him since he was a state employee over Homeland Security. And and I'm gonna support him in that decision because he just didn't know.
Now had it been a life and death situation, you know, surely he would have done something, but I can get the names. But he's probably been out of the academy less than two years.
Speaker 0: Then well, shows his mindset, and he doesn't have a good sense of morality if his default is I can't do anything because he's the government. Then you don't need to be an officer, honestly.
Speaker 4: Let me ask you something. Did you when you and when you and mister Booger were standing on the corner by the bank, or on the corner by the courthouse and the black officer was there, did you have that recorded as well, the conversation between him and the black officer?
Speaker 0: Oh, I know what you're talking about. And I heard about this through my friends, but I don't think I was there.
Speaker 4: Okay. I I have a problem there.
Speaker 0: And I
Speaker 4: and if you have that on video, I would love if you could send that to me because I'm not happy with that situation there at all. And I have a report on that in my file from that officer, what he said to him, and that that's just not cool.
Speaker 0: I mean yeah. That
Speaker 4: We should be way past that. And here's my deal with that. I'm I'm being 100% transparent with you. If that guy got this rattled just from you walking into a public lobby and videoing and asking a few questions, is that who you really want over your homeland security in case of an emergency? Come on.
Speaker 0: That's a really good question. Yep. Exactly. I
Speaker 4: mean and and I if I get the opportunity, I plan on asking that question to his superiors. In fact, I've already met with the secretary treasurer and gave her a copy of this. If you were in a supervisory position, you're trained. You've got to overcome those obstacles and just do better, be better, and handle things differently. And if he can't handle this situation no better than he handled it, god help us if we have a tornado come through the middle of our parish.
Alright. Like I said, I have nothing to hide off or anyway I can as long as I'm allowed to. If they shut me down, say, hey. No more correspondence. But I'll give you what I've got until then, till they tell me different.
And so far, I thought the sheriff is actually at an LSA conference in Florida out of state right now. And I to him last night, and he said, absolutely. Call him back, you know, as soon as you get a minute. Let him know that Booth has been arrested, and we're gonna cooperate fully. So that's what we're
Speaker 3: doing. Awesome.