reSee.it - Related Post Feed

WesternLensman
Posted - August 13, 2024 at 3:32 PM
Saved - August 13, 2024 at 4:11 PM

@WesternLensman - Western Lensman

ABC’s Rachel Scott attacks 𝕏, questions if @elonmusk was being truthful about the DDOS attack that delayed the 𝕏 space with Donald Trump: Musk “provided no evidence of such a cyber attack." Legacy media is in absolute panic over the massive success of this conversation.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Elon Musk and Donald Trump's conversation was delayed due to tech issues. Trump's Twitter account, previously banned for false election claims, was reinstated by Musk in 2022. The conversation was marred by controversial statements and insults. Musk blamed technical difficulties on a cyberattack, claiming opposition to Trump's message. No evidence of the attack was provided.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This all got off to a very rocky start. That conversation was delayed by more than 40 minutes because of those tech issues. Elon Musk said he wanted to have this conversation so that the former president could appeal to independent voters, but Trump fell into a very familiar pattern of controversial statements, insults, and attacks. Overnight, Donald Trump's bot returned to the platform that once banished him for posting false claims about the election. The company is saying at the time the account was permanently suspended due to the risk of further incitement of violence. It was reinstated by Elon Musk in November of 2022 when Musk bought the company. Trump returning to the conversation Monday for a conversation with Musk. Technical issues delaying it from the start for more than 40 minutes. Musk blaming a so called denial of service attack, a kind of cyberattack that floods a server with traffic to force it offline, saying the massive attack illustrates there's a lot of opposition to people just hearing what president Trump has to say, though we provided no evidence of such a cyberattack.
cb_doge
Posted - August 13, 2024 at 6:12 PM
Saved - August 13, 2024 at 9:23 PM

@cb_doge - DogeDesigner

CNN selectively edited Donald Trump and Elon Musk's conversation to claim they said that the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombings were not a big problem. The full context shows they were talking about nuclear energy. via @TrumpWarRoom https://t.co/2tiPrISSWb

Video Transcript AI Summary
I want to highlight a notable exchange that reflects classic Donald Trump. He discussed the aftermath of the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, suggesting that the cities have recovered and are thriving again. This perspective downplays the historical impact of those events, implying that the situation is not as frightening as many believe. It seems more aligned with Elon Musk's viewpoint than Trump's, as it attempts to minimize the significance of what happened nearly 80 years ago.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I wanna play one exchange that was kind of classic. Well, there were a lot of exchanges that were exchanges that were classic Donald Trump, but this one really stuck out to us. And, you know, you were were bombed, but now they're they're, like, full cities again. So it's not something that you know? That's right. So it's it's not it's not as scary as people think, basically. So that was more Elon Musk than, Donald Trump talking about sort of suggesting that what happened almost 80 years ago, I think 80 years ago next year, the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Now it's okay, kind of trying to blow off the the impact of that.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Nuclear energy often faces fear and misunderstanding, but it is one of the safest forms of electricity generation. When comparing injuries and deaths from nuclear power to other energy sources, such as coal mining, nuclear is significantly safer. However, strict regulations hinder its development. The negative branding associated with nuclear energy, stemming from incidents like Fukushima and Chernobyl, contributes to public fear. Despite these events, the reality is that areas affected by nuclear incidents can recover and thrive again, as seen in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Overall, nuclear energy deserves a reconsideration and better branding to reflect its safety and potential.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Yeah. And, actually, it the the there's the there's the bad side of nuclear, which is a nuclear war, very bad side. But there's there's also, I think, nuclear electricity generation is underrating. Speaker 1: You're right. Speaker 0: And it's actually you know, people have this fear of of nuclear nuclear electricity generation, but it but it's actually one of the safest forms of electricity generation. It's it's it's just a huge misunderstanding. And, if you look at the injuries and deaths, you know, caused by, say I mean, I'm not gonna turn pick on coal mining, but just any kind of mining operation. And, there's a certain number of of injuries and deaths per year. When you compare that to nuclear, nuclear is actually, way better. So it's it's underrated as a as an electricity source, and I think it's it's something that's worth reconsidering. But there's so much regulation that people can't get it done. So that, you know Speaker 1: Maybe they'll have to change the name. The name is just it's a rough name. There are some areas like Yes. Speaker 0: Rough name. Speaker 1: When you see what happened in The the bad writing. The branding. To rebrand it. We'll have to give it a good name. We'll name it after you or something. You know? No. It has a hey. It has a branding problem. You know, when you see what happens It does have a branding problem. When you see what happened in Japan, where they say you won't be able to go on the land for about 3000 years. Did you ever say that? And in Russia, where they had the problem, where they, you know, the there's a lot of bad things happened and, they have a problem. And they say that in 2000 years, people will start to occupy the land again. You know, you realize it's pretty bad. No. That's not true. But there's you're right around. It's it's the basic Speaker 0: It's it's actually not that bad. So so, like, after Fukushima happened in Japan, like, people were were asking me in California, you know, are we worried about, like, a nuclear cloud coming from Japan? I'm like, no. That's crazy. It's it's actually it's not even dangerous in Fukushima. I actually flew there and and, oh, and ate locally grown vegetables on TV to prove it. And and I donated a a a solar water treatment yeah. It's a solar power system for a water treatment plant. And, you know Speaker 1: But you haven't been dealing so well lately, and I'm worried about it. No. No. But I I'm only getting I'm fine. Speaker 0: You know? It's it's like, you know, Hiroshima and Nagasaki were were bombed, but now they're they're, like, full cities again. So it's it's really not something that you know? Speaker 1: That's right. Speaker 0: So it's it's not it's not as scary as people think, basically.
WesternLensman
Posted - September 23, 2024 at 4:13 PM
Saved - September 23, 2024 at 8:17 PM

@WesternLensman - Western Lensman

NEW: Axios propagandist labels @elonmusk a spreader of “misinformation,” repeatedly tries to get NASA Admin Bill Nelson to disparage Musk as a “distraction” to NASA’s mission: Nelson, after praising SpaceX: “It distracts you. It doesn’t distract NASA." 💀😂 https://t.co/s49nqsvk7w

Video Transcript AI Summary
Elon Musk's misinformation and distractions were raised as a concern for NASA's mission. It was stated that Gwynne Shotwell, SpaceX's president and 8th employee, runs the company. SpaceX's success with crew and cargo to orbit was highlighted. SpaceX, along with Blue Origin, will be NASA's two landers to get astronauts to the moon in lunar orbit. While Elon Musk's headlines may be distracting to some, it was claimed they do not distract NASA.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Do you worry about Elon Musk and the misinformation that he spreads that that detracts or distracts from NASA and its mission? Speaker 1: You know, the good news about that is that Elon has a president that he lets run the company. And her name is Gwen Shotwell. And she's done that. She was the 8th employee of SpaceX. And she's done a phenomenal job. And as we say in the south, the proofs in the pudding, look, look at the, the crew to orbit, cargo to orbit. Now we'll see they, along with Jeff Bezos company, Blue Origin, are gonna be our 2 landers. We're gonna get our astronauts to the moon in lunar orbit, and then they will transfer Speaker 0: necessarily how SpaceX is run as you're saying. I'm just talking about the distraction of the constant headlines about him and if you all feel like that's a distraction? Speaker 1: Well, they distract you, but they don't distract NASA.
WesternLensman
Posted - October 5, 2024 at 2:09 AM
Saved - October 5, 2024 at 2:48 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Tonight, CNN launched a broad attack on me for my support of Trump and my visit to Butler, PA, labeling it a "quasi-religious" site. They made various claims, including that I promote fake information, respond to Trump's authoritarianism, and use my relationship with him for business advantages. They criticized my posting habits and suggested I have too much time on my hands. Notably, they completely ignored my efforts to help Hurricane Helene victims, while the federal government struggles. Is this what legacy media has become?

@WesternLensman - Western Lensman

Tonight, CNN launched a wide-ranging, haphazard attack on @elonmusk for his support of Trump, and his visit to the “quasi-religious” site of Butler, PA. Not a single mention of Musk mobilizing his companies and resources to aid victims of Hurricane Helene. Not one. A summary of the attacks, which go on for a whopping four minutes: - Musk likes Trump’s authoritarianism - Musk constantly posts fake information - Musk responds to Trump’s strongman tendencies - Musk is visiting Butler because it is a quasi-religious site that made Trump “the target he always wanted to be" - Musk “bought into the emotion” of the Butler assass*nation attempt - Musk is using the Trump relationship to aid his companies that are under investigation - Musk turned X into an echo chamber - Musk posts propaganda on false claims - Musk wants a job in Trump govt - Musk seems to have too much time on his hands because he posts a lot of false information - Musk posts too much to be able to run his companies and get anything else done There’s throwing everything against the wall to see what sticks, and then there’s whatever this pile of hot garbage is. Again — not a single mention of the work Musk is doing to aid hurricane victims, while the federal government flails. Do you really hate legacy media enough?

CollinRugg
Posted - October 9, 2024 at 1:12 PM
Saved - October 9, 2024 at 3:05 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I recently saw a CNN panel acknowledging their mistakes in how they treated Elon Musk, which contributed to his distancing from the Democratic party. They criticized the Biden administration for excluding him from events and emphasized that we should have recognized his contributions to electric vehicles and space exploration. One panelist shared that Musk expressed his frustration over not being invited to an EV summit, prompting them to question the White House about the oversight.

@CollinRugg - Collin Rugg

NEW: CNN panel admits they messed up and drove Elon Musk away from the Democratic party, say they should have respected his contributions to the world. The panel blasted the Biden administration for purposely excluding Musk from events. “I think where the Democrats started to lose Elon was actually personal. We should have celebrated his contributions to electric vehicles.” “We should have said, look, Starlink great product that that needs to be used. We should celebrate the fact that he's had the first commercial success of private people in space.” “I got a call from him about it when he wasn't invited to that EV summit, he should have been invited.” “I called the White House. I never called the White House. And I'm like, why didn't you invite him? He's very angry.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 states that rhetoric makes politicians less than human. Speaker 1 believes Democrats lost Elon Musk because they didn't celebrate his contributions to electric vehicles, Starlink, and private space endeavors, even though he was against unionization. Speaker 2 says he received a call from Musk about not being invited to an EV summit and called the White House to ask why. He felt Musk should have been invited and that the union issue was the reason for the snub. Speaker 1 agrees he deserved credit. Speaker 1 thinks Musk should stay off Twitter and not make jokes about the Vice President. Speaker 1 says Democrats should remember that Musk supported Obama and that the Democratic party should be about innovation and entrepreneurship.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This kind of rhetoric that makes politicians something less than what they are, which is human beings. Speaker 1: I appreciate you're saying that, Scott. I think where the Democrats started to lose Elon, was actually personal. We should have celebrated, his contributions to electric vehicles even though he was against, unionization and stood up to unions. We should have said, look. Starlink, great product. That that needs to be used. We should celebrate the fact that he's had the first commercial success of private people in space. And I'm wondering And I think a lot of it was that we didn't celebrate it, and he said he felt offended. He Speaker 2: does get a lot of attention. How was I mean, I'm genuinely curious. I mean, was there something you think that Democrats did? What was the thing? No. What was the thing? Yeah. I got a I got a call from him about it when he wasn't invited to that EV summit. He should have been invited. I I called the White House. I never called the White House. Yeah. I'm like, why didn't you invite him? He's very angry. In fact, I had an interview with Pete Buttigieg at the time, who also was a little bit, glib about it. And I was like, he's critically important in this sector. I think the union thing was the big deal of why they didn't invite him, and they should have. He deserved that credit Speaker 1: for what he was doing. Tweeting out about his private flights and then taking a private plane. Speaker 2: I'm sorry. I don't think Democrats get blamed for that. Speaker 1: No. No. I'm just saying that look. And I I think he should stay off Twitter. I certainly think he shouldn't be making jokes about the vice president. But I think with the Democrats remember, he was a supporter of Obama. Bill Clinton Obama had this, and we are the party that is John f Kennedy, that is about innovation, that is about entrepreneurship. They didn't initially give a tax return. We should be celebrating Speaker 2: that part of There's a weird
WesternLensman
Posted - November 4, 2024 at 1:59 AM
Saved - November 5, 2024 at 5:40 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I noticed Claire McCaskill from MSNBC trying to insult Elon Musk, suggesting that his success in rockets and electric cars doesn't qualify him to influence voting. It seems like legacy media can't resist attacking him while expressing concern over the influence of money in politics. They highlight that top donors to Trump have given over $1 billion, yet they overlook the massive spending by Democrats, backed by billionaire donors who rarely face scrutiny. This behavior from the press feels particularly disingenuous.

@WesternLensman - Western Lensman

NEW: MSNBC’S Claire McCaskill pathetically attempts to insult @elonmusk: "He thinks because he can do rockets and electric cars, that he can figure out how to get people to vote." IVapid legacy media talking heads can’t go 5 minutes without attacking Elon; and they’re all suddenly hyper-concerned about the “scary” amount of money in politics: "I think it's really scary territory. You know, we have some billionaires in this country. And if you look at the top ten donors to Donald Trump, they've given over $1 billion to just the top five. Yeah. I mean, and that was not counting how much more Musk has spent. Musk is in Pennsylvania. He thinks because he can do rockets and electric cars, that he can figure out how to get people to vote." Democrats are massively outspending Republicans, thanks to many high-profile billionaire donors that NEVER receive an ounce of scrutiny — some of whom are also actively involved as campaign surrogates. This is pathetic, even for the propaganda press.

Video Transcript AI Summary
A group of major donors, including Elon Musk, is heavily influencing the political landscape, particularly in support of Donald Trump. The top ten donors have contributed over $1 billion, with Musk actively campaigning in Pennsylvania. However, he faces challenges in mobilizing low-propensity voters, particularly young men who typically show little interest in voting. The efforts to engage these voters, labeled as "bros," are complicated by their general apathy towards the electoral process, making it difficult to encourage them to participate in elections.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But this group of mega mega donors, bigger donors than we ever have seen, the likes of Elon Musk, who's campaigning more and harder than any business person who might end up with an official or unofficial role in a Donald Trump administration. What do you think Speaker 1: about all this? What are people telling you? Well, I mean it's really scary territory. We have some billionaires in this country and if you look at the top 10 donors to Donald Trump, they've given over $1,000,000,000 to him. Speaker 0: Just the top 5. Speaker 1: Yeah, I mean, and that was not counting how much more Musk has spent. Musk is in Pennsylvania. He thinks because he can do rockets and electric cars that he can figure out how to get people to vote. But he's got a hard assignment because the people he's trying to get to vote are low propensity voters. They're people that don't vote all the time. In fact, this bro thing that they've done, you know, let's get the young men. Well, the reason they're bros is because they don't care about voting. Speaker 0: Yeah. They're not giving a big you're not going to vote. Speaker 1: Yeah. They're really hard to get to the voting place.
nicksortor
Posted - December 22, 2024 at 6:33 PM
Saved - December 22, 2024 at 8:06 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I just saw President Trump call the media's portrayal of Elon Musk a hoax, comparing it to the "Russia Russia Russia" narrative. He emphasized that the legacy media dislikes their friendship and clarified that Musk won't be President, but praised his intelligence and achievements.

@nicksortor - Nick Sortor

🚨 JUST IN: President Trump says the media’s “President Elon Musk” hoax is the new “Russia Russia Russia” The legacy media can’t STAND the fact that @elonmusk and Trump get along so well 🤣 “No, he’s not going to be President that I can tell you.” “But Elon has done an amazing job. Isn’t it nice to have smart people?”

Video Transcript AI Summary
We will establish a new department of government efficiency led by Elon Musk. He is not taking over the presidency; I appreciate having smart people around. There's a narrative circulating about President Trump ceding the presidency to Elon Musk, but that's not true. Elon has accomplished remarkable things, like successfully landing a rocket recently. It was coming down at an incredible speed of 17,000 miles per hour, and it landed safely. It's great to have capable individuals we can depend on.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And we will create the new department of government efficiency headed by Elon Musk. And, no, he's not taking the president. I like having smart people. You know, the, they're on a new kick. Russia, Russia, Russia, Ukraine, Ukraine, Ukraine, all the different hoaxes. And the new one is president Trump has ceded the the presidency to Elon Musk. No. No. That's not happening. But Elon's done an amazing job. Isn't it nice to have smart people that we can rely on? Don't we want that? He's done a great job. And I'll tell you, he, he landed that rocket a few months ago. It landed. It's coming down so fast. 17,000 miles an hour, he says, and coming down. It looks like it's getting
WesternLensman
Posted - January 7, 2025 at 12:07 AM
Saved - January 7, 2025 at 2:10 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I just watched a CNN segment criticizing Elon Musk for his comments on the UK r*pe gang scandal. They framed it as Musk attacking a key ally, with clips suggesting he's targeting UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer and influencing European politics negatively. The tone was harsh, labeling Musk's statements as sensationalist and questioning his motives. I find this coverage absolutely disgusting.

@WesternLensman - Western Lensman

CNN just ran a five-minute segment attacking @elonmusk for speaking out against the r*pe gang scandal in the UK. This is how they framed it: Tapper: "Musk is taking aim at a staunch U.S. ally." Chyron: "Elon Musk lashes out at UK Prime Minister." Robertson: "Elon Musk is dialing up attacks on European politicians." Chyron: "European leaders push back on Elon Musk’s influence." Robertson: "Musk is using his social media platform X to trash UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer." Starmer clip: “Poison of the far right." Robertson: “Musk's inaccurate and sensationalist accusations are catching UK politicians off guard." Robertson: "How far right does [Musk] want to take them?" ---- Absolutely disgusting. This is CNN.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Elon Musk has intensified his criticism of European politicians, particularly targeting the UK government over a child abuse scandal involving gangs of British Pakistani men. He accused Prime Minister Keir Starmer of failing to act during his tenure as chief prosecutor. In response, Starmer condemned Musk's attacks as dangerous and inaccurate. Musk also criticized Jess Phillips, a government official responsible for child safeguarding, calling her "plain evil." Meanwhile, Musk's relationship with Nigel Farage has soured over differing views on controversial figures like Tommy Robinson. As Musk aligns with far-right candidates in Europe, questions arise about his political ambitions and strategies, particularly regarding the Labour Party's dominance in the UK.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Mayor Elon Musk decided to more assertively enter the American political discourse. He has not shied away from expressing strong opinions, already skirmishing with US politicians, and now he's attacking several European politicians. Musk's focus for the past few days has been over the UK, over a scandal that involved thousands of girls raped there for decades by what an independent inquiry confirmed for gangs of mostly British Pakistani men. Musk is taking aim at a staunch US ally, the UK, that Trump will need a strong relationship with, faulting, among others, the British prime minister for not doing more to stop those horrific crimes when he was director of public prosecutions for the UK's crime protective services. Musk today writing on, x, quote, America should liberate the people of Britain from their tyrannical government, unquote. CNN's Nick Robertson has been following this and joins me now from London. And, Nick, obviously, the government of London is a democracy. It's not a it's not a tyranny, but what is the response there to these horrific scandals as well as, Musk attacking the prime minister? Speaker 1: Yeah. I think, on the one hand, you had the British prime minister doing what a former prosecutor does, which is not get drawn into the other side's argument, if you will, and relitigate something that was very painful for the country, that the country went through, and that there were inquiries. And the they came out during the last conservative government who, over the course of 8 years, didn't do anything about it, but that wasn't wasn't mentioned by Elon Musk. Nevertheless, this is very dangerous stuff for this British government at the moment despite its massive majority, and it's got some of them worried. Elon Musk. Elon Musk is dialing up attacks on European politicians. The barbs aimed at Britain coming thick, fast, and painful using his social media platform x to trash UK prime minister Keir Starmer for alleged failings in a child abuse scandal involving gangs of South Asian men in multiple UK cities grooming the vulnerable young girls. That was when Starmer was the UK's chief prosecutor more than a decade ago. Starmer is firing back. Speaker 2: We've seen this playbook many times, whipping up of, intimidation and threats of violence. Speaker 1: I I I said Musk's betrayal sharpest against Jess Phillips, the government official charged with safeguarding children, calling her plain evil and a wicked creature who should be in prison for not sanctioning a nationwide inquiry, but a local one instead. Speaker 2: When the poison of the far right leads to serious threats to Jess Phillips and others, But in my book, a line has been crossed. Speaker 1: Musk's inaccurate and sensationalist accusations are catching UK politicians off guard, and Musk is also attacking a staunch Trump ally, Nigel Farage, saying Farage doesn't have what it takes to lead his upstart reform UK party. Speaker 3: We've got our country back. Speaker 1: Farage, the British populist who pushed Brexit just hours before Musk's put down, had counted the tech titan a supporter who might finance his fledgling party. Speaker 3: The fact that he supports me politically and supports reform doesn't mean I have to agree with every single statement he makes on x. Speaker 1: Why the falling out? Possible differences over this man known as Tommy Robinson, a jailed anti Muslim campaigner who fanned the flames of racist riots last summer. Musk praises him. Farage doesn't. UK elections are years away, but Musk is now championing some of Europe's more extreme far right candidates even over some of the more well known right wing voices. Speaker 3: 10 years ago, who would have imagined if we have been told that the owner of one of the largest social networks in the world would support a new international Speaker 1: party ahead of elections there next month. But Italy is now rewarding Musk's rightward European tilt. The populist right wing PM Georgia Maloney just visited with president-elect Donald Trump seemingly nudging a $1,600,000,000 SpaceX deal with Italy closer to the world's richest man. So I think the the question that's being asked by a lot of people, politicians in particular in Europe, is how far right does Musk wanna go? Is he picking up the baton of Steve Bannon, who during Trump's last administration as adviser back then was really trying to rally the European far right, make them into a bigger political force? Well, that's kind of happened and Musk seems to be pushing that forward. How far right does he wanna take them? And if you look at the example in the UK, that is worryingly apparently to the right. And I think the other question, you know, that that that ponders the mind of politicians in the UK specifically, if he is targeting the Labour Party that have a massive majority and are 4 to 5 years away from another election, this must be a long term strategy. How long will it last?

@WesternLensman - Western Lensman

@elonmusk https://t.co/HjVBOSX4Sa

@CollinRugg - Collin Rugg

@WesternLensman @elonmusk Pretty much. https://t.co/Kpsy1CwbFn

libsoftiktok
Posted - January 7, 2025 at 5:49 PM
Saved - January 28, 2025 at 5:10 PM

@libsoftiktok - Libs of TikTok

CNN is really mad that Elon is talking about the Muslim r*pe gangs. Why is that??? Why don’t Jim Acosta and Brian Stelter want p*dos to be exposed and brought to justice?? 🤔 https://t.co/KRf5mVi8xn

Video Transcript AI Summary
Elon Musk's initial vision for Twitter as a neutral free speech platform has shifted significantly. Recently, he has drawn attention to long-standing issues of child sexual abuse in the UK, often presenting them as new discoveries, which has sparked reactions from European leaders. Musk is also implementing algorithm changes on X to promote positive content while simultaneously discussing negative topics like gangs and rape. An exchange on X highlighted Musk's aggressive response to criticism, where he dismissed a user calling him a major spreader of disinformation. This reflects a trend among tech CEOs who advocate for free speech but often favor their own perspectives. Similar changes at Meta suggest a shift towards a more conservative user base, raising concerns about the spread of misinformation across platforms.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Brian, we've come a long way from those days when Elon Musk, you know, took over Twitter and said, I'm gonna make this a free speech marketplace. We're gonna be completely neutral and so on. That's just completely out the window. But let's talk about some of these, these headlines we've been seeing where you have foreign leaders raising questions about the influence that he has. Speaker 1: Yes. And it's because, Musk has been raising attention about sexual abuse of children in the United Kingdom dating back decades. Some of these stories actually go back about 20 years. Musk has been bringing them up on X over and over again, in some cases acting as if he's just discovered some of these stories. They are horrible stories. But oftentimes, it seems like Musk is coming in like a brand new college freshman, brand new to a subject, as if he found out about it for the first time. And because his voice is so loud on x, he causes a lot of reactions. That's what these European leaders are reacting to. Musk also is announcing algorithm changes to x. He wants more positive content and less negative content even as he posts about gangs and about rape and other very negative subjects. It is notable that just as Trump is about to take office, Musk says he wants more positive more positivity, Jim, and less negativity. Isn't that interesting timing? Speaker 0: Very interesting timing. And I have to read this exchange, and I wanna caution our viewers, you know, what they're gonna hear is is slightly disturbing. Disturbing, I shouldn't say slightly, disturbing. Between Musk and an ex user who criticized him, we'll put this on screen. Elon Musk is this is the user saying Elon Musk is rapidly becoming the largest spreader of disinformation in human history, hijacking political debates in the process. The s the EU, I should say, must take action. And Musk responds, f u And then, an r word, which, I mean, I guess you could look through the the way we pixelated that. It's a derogatory term for people with mental disabilities, mentally challenged people. What is happening here? And and why is he doing that? Speaker 1: He's attacking the user. It gets to this broader sense that when people like Zuckerberg, Elon Musk, or Mark Zuckerberg talk about free speech, everybody wants free speech. But it oftentimes seems that these tech CEOs actually are favoring or preferring a certain kind of speech. Right? They're favoring their own speech or their own political preferences and not the actual entire user or the community's speech. You know, the changes announced by Meta today are very much a MAGA makeover, a pro Trump makeover, and that's gonna win Meta some conservative users, but it may repel some liberals. That's the same thing we've seen happen on Elon Musk's x. He's turned it into more of a right wing platform where he's he's pro free speech when it's really pro Musk or pro Trump speech. Speaker 0: Alright. Brian Stelter, thanks as always. And and you mentioned, those changes over at Meta. That is gonna be fascinating to watch moving forward because, obviously, Facebook and and Instagram places like that have also been accused of being super spreaders of of disinformation, misinformation. We'll keep our eyes on that.
EndWokeness
Posted - January 20, 2025 at 8:20 PM
Saved - January 20, 2025 at 8:34 PM

@EndWokeness - End Wokeness

CNN hosts are now pretending that Elon did a deliberate HitIer salute on live TV https://t.co/cIKdIzMov1

Video Transcript AI Summary
He is seen as a hero, and we should look at the salute he gave. It was quick but significant, especially in the context of the moment. This isn't something typically seen at American political rallies. The intensity of the situation was palpable as he came out dancing before delivering the salute. His actions resonate strongly with the audience here.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: He is a hero to them. I just wanna look at that salute that he gave again. Just if anybody missed it, we'll just show it again. He's just wrapped up here. You can hear the there alright. So we just we just showed that. We just showed that. Right. It's Salute. It was quick. I think our viewers are smart, and they can take a look at that. But it certainly was it's not something we took a little state American political rallies. Put it that way. No. No. It was not something that you usually would see. And it was quick. As you point out, it was very quick, but it was it was in a moment of intensity for him as he came out dancing and then he did that. He is a hero here.
MediasLies
Posted - January 20, 2025 at 8:27 PM
Saved - January 21, 2025 at 2:12 AM

@MediasLies - Media Lies

CNN is accusing Elon Musk of doing a Nazi salute on stage. Full context shows Elon was gesturing that his heart goes out to the crowd. They’re grasping at straws today. https://t.co/g0sMXQytEr

Video Transcript AI Summary
Elon Musk is increasingly involved in politics, influencing both U.S. and European parties, including a far-right party in Germany. His ambitions are vast, as he aims to take Dogecoin to Mars and emphasizes the importance of government funding for space exploration. The crowd at a recent rally is fully engaged, viewing Musk as a hero, especially during moments like when President Trump mentioned Mars, which drew a standing ovation. This event highlights the unique role billionaires are playing in politics today, with Musk rallying support and connecting with the working-class coalition. The atmosphere inside the arena reflects this intense engagement and admiration for Musk.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Browsing lines for this crowd. Speaker 1: This is one of his browsing lines indeed. And, yes, that's salute, was evocative of things that we have seen, through history. And, of course, we do wanna, bring it up to, be able to to take a little bit of a closer look. But I think it's worth noting that Elon Musk has started to play in politics not just here, in the United States, but across Europe as well, including a far right party, in Germany that he has, pushed. He's, of course, pressured, Keir Starmer, the prime minister, in the United Kingdom. This is something there there are some themes here, for him. And as we heard here, his ambitions are sweeping. He came in, he said, this is what winning feels like. He also says we're gonna take Doge to Mars. That, of course, an ambition of his, of his entire life. I do find it interesting that he's touting government spending on the one hand. What got us to the moon and what's gonna get us to Mars is gonna be government money. We should be clear Speaker 0: to that. Just it absolutely will be. As it so to just to look at this again, this crowd, every single person here is paying attention and they are fully engaged. He is a hero. He is a hero to them. I just wanna look at that salute that he gave again just if anybody missed it, we'll just show it again. He's just wrapped up here, you can hear the there. Alright. So we just we just showed that. We just showed that. Speaker 1: Right. Absolutely. It was quick. I think our viewers are smart and they can take a look at that. But it certainly was it's not something that you typically see in American political rallies. Put it that way. Speaker 0: No. No. It was not something that you usually would see. And it was quick. As you point out, it was very quick, but it was it was in a moment of intensity for him as he came out dancing and then he did that. He is a hero here in the speech, when president Trump mentioned going to Mars, that was also a standing of a ovation. And when Elon Musk was mentioned, he is a hero for every single person in this room. And we're inside the arena as you can see that's the outside. But inside here, this is the the this is the atmosphere and this is the tone. Speaker 1: And, you know, I have to say to, Erin, you know, I'm just struck when we were talking about this a little bit earlier. Yes. These billionaires, right, the role that they are playing, and I know you've covered business for years years. I have never seen as a political and campaign reporter, a Capitol Hill reporter, billionaires, business people play the kind of public role that we have seen them play today both in the ceremony and then to have one of them come here and essentially function as someone rallying the crowd from a political perspective. I think it's it's worth stopping and and and dwelling on it for a moment, especially because this is, again, the working class coalition.
CollinRugg
Posted - January 20, 2025 at 8:28 PM
Saved - January 20, 2025 at 9:15 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I noticed CNN's coverage suggesting that Elon Musk made a Nazi salute at a Trump event, but they didn't include his comment expressing sympathy for the crowd. CNN described the gesture as quick and unusual for American political rallies, leaving viewers to interpret it.

@CollinRugg - Collin Rugg

NEW: CNN suggests Elon Musk made a Nazi salute during Trump's event at Capitol One arena, purposely leaves out Musk's comments when he said his heart goes out to the crowd. CNN: "It's a salute. It was quick. I think our viewers are smart and they can take a look at that, but it certainly was, it's not something that you typically see at American political rallies." Musk: "My heart goes out to you."

Video Transcript AI Summary
Let's take another look at that salute. It was brief, but definitely not something you typically see at American political rallies. It happened during an intense moment when he came out dancing. He is considered a hero here. Thank you for making this happen; my heart goes out to you. It's because of you that the future of civilization is assured.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Just wanna look at that salute that he gave again. Just if anybody missed it, we'll just show it again. He's just wrapped up here. You can hear the alright. So we just we just showed that. We just showed that. Speaker 1: Right. It's worth noting. It was quick. I think our viewers are smart and they can take a look at that, but it certainly was it's not something that you typically see in American political rallies. Speaker 0: Put it Speaker 1: that way. Speaker 0: No. No. It was not something that you usually would see. And it was quick. As you point out, it was very quick, but it was it was in a moment of intensity for him as he came out dancing, and then he did that. He is a hero here. Speaker 1: And I just wanna say thank you for making it happen. Thank you. My heart goes out to you. It is thanks to you that the future of civilization is assured.
charliekirk11
Posted - January 20, 2025 at 8:39 PM
Saved - January 21, 2025 at 1:04 AM

@charliekirk11 - Charlie Kirk

This is just ridiculous. Elon Musk says his heart goes out to the patriots in Capital One Arena, so he pounds his chest and waves at the crowd. CNN: Musk just gave a Nazi salute!! These people are so thirsty for controversy and racism—that doesn’t exist—it’s astounding.

@CollinRugg - Collin Rugg

NEW: CNN suggests Elon Musk made a Nazi salute during Trump's event at Capitol One arena, purposely leaves out Musk's comments when he said his heart goes out to the crowd. CNN: "It's a salute. It was quick. I think our viewers are smart and they can take a look at that, but it certainly was, it's not something that you typically see at American political rallies." Musk: "My heart goes out to you."

Video Transcript AI Summary
The salute was noteworthy and quick, something not commonly seen at American political rallies. It occurred during an intense moment when he came out dancing. His actions have resonated deeply, and he is considered a hero here. A heartfelt thank you is extended for making this happen, as it is believed that this effort ensures the future of civilization.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Just wanna look at that salute that he gave again. Just if anybody missed it, we'll just show it again. He's just wrapped up here. You can hear the alright. So we just we just showed that. We just showed that. Speaker 1: Right. It's worth noting. It was quick. I think our viewers are smart and they can take a look at that, but it certainly was it's not something that you typically see in American political rallies. Speaker 0: Put it Speaker 1: that way. Speaker 0: No. No. It was not something that you usually would see. And it was quick. As you point out, it was very quick, but it was it was in a moment of intensity for him as he came out dancing, and then he did that. He is a hero here. Speaker 1: And I just wanna say thank you for making it happen. Thank you. My heart goes out to you. It is thanks to you that the future of civilization is assured.
rawsalerts
Posted - January 20, 2025 at 8:48 PM
Saved - January 20, 2025 at 10:12 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I watched CNN's coverage where they suggested that Elon Musk made a Nazi salute during Trump's event at Capital One Arena. They criticized him but left out his comments expressing sympathy, where he said, "My heart goes out to you." A CNN host remarked that it was a quick salute and implied viewers could judge for themselves, noting it was unusual for American political rallies. However, I believe Musk's gesture was misinterpreted and was actually a heartfelt expression aimed at the crowd.

@rawsalerts - R A W S A L E R T S

🚨#BREAKING: Watch as CNN suggests Elon Musk made a Nazi salute during Trump's event at Capitol One arena 📌#Washington | #DC Watch as CNN criticized Elon Musk and suggested he made a Nazi salute during Trump's event at Capital One Arena, but they omitted his comments expressing sympathy, where he said, "My heart goes out to you." A CNN host stated, "It's a salute. It was quick. I think our viewers are smart and can judge for themselves, but it's certainly not something typically seen at American political rallies." However, Musk's gesture was not a Nazi salute; instead, it was a heartfelt expression directed toward the crowd

Video Transcript AI Summary
Let's take another look at that salute. It was quick, but definitely noteworthy and not something you typically see at American political rallies. It happened during an intense moment when he came out dancing, and it stood out. He is regarded as a hero here, and I want to express gratitude for making this possible. My heartfelt thanks go out to you, as it is because of your efforts that the future of civilization is secured.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I just wanna look at that salute that he gave again. Just if anybody missed it, we'll just show it again. He's just wrapped up here. You can hear the alright. So we just we just showed that. We just showed that. Right. It's worth a look. It was quick. I think our viewers are smart and they can take a look at that, but it certainly was it's not something that you typically see in American political rallies. Put it that way. No. No. It was not something that you usually would see. And it was quick. As you point out, it was very quick, but it was it was in a moment of intensity for him as he came out dancing, and then he did that. He is a hero here. And I just wanna say thank you for making it happen. Thank you. My heart goes out to you. It is thanks to you that the future of civilization is assured.
CollinRugg
Posted - January 28, 2025 at 4:06 AM
Saved - January 29, 2025 at 4:55 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I watched as journalist Catherine Rampell reacted strongly after Scott Jennings advised her to "lawyer up" following her claim that Elon Musk was aligning with Nazis. CNN has accused Musk of making a Nazi salute at a Trump rally, and Rampell seemed convinced of his allegiance to them.

@CollinRugg - Collin Rugg

NEW: Journalist Catherine Rampell has a meltdown after Scott Jennings tells her to lawyer up after she suggested Elon Musk is aligning himself with Nazis. CNN is now directly accusing Elon Musk of doing a Nazi salute at Trump’s rally. Rampell was morally outraged over Musk’s hand gesture and has appeared to convince herself that Musk was pledging his allegiance to Nazis. Jennings: You better lawyer up. Rampell: *Has meltdown*

Video Transcript AI Summary
Elon Musk's comments about globalist Jews and the great replacement of brown people have raised significant concerns. His statements, particularly regarding Jews pushing hatred against white people, have led to accusations of him aligning with Nazi sentiments. Despite his history of supporting Jewish people, many question why he continues to receive the benefit of the doubt. There is a debate about whether his actions were misinterpreted or if they genuinely reflect problematic views. Some argue that criticism of Musk overshadows the rising anti-Semitism on college campuses, while others emphasize the importance of addressing his controversial remarks directly. The discussion highlights the complexities of navigating these sensitive topics in today's climate.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Look, the the first time that Elon Musk decides to declare that globalist Jews are responsible for the great replacement of brown people into the United States, maybe it was a misunderstanding. You know? The second time he said that Jews are pushing hatred against white people, that's a quote. You know, that was a little iffy. By the second Sieg Heil, I think he kind of loses the benefit of the doubt to to be not accused of playing FTSE with these Nazis. I'm not saying he's a Nazi, I'm saying the Nazis think he's a Nazi, which they very clearly did at this event. And this was not, these words were not said in a vacuum. As you pointed out, the leaders of AFD have, embraced, in many cases, the Nazi heritage. They have wanted to take down the Holocaust Memorial in Berlin, saying it is inappropriate to to recognize this horrific chapter in German history. And I I just think it's it's horrific. I I don't understand why this guy keeps getting the benefit of the doubt, whether or not he believes this stuff personally. Speaker 1: Mentioned the Nazi jokes he was making on Twitter that actually got Speaker 0: He's been given so many chances. About Speaker 1: it. Yeah. I I was hearing a lot of signs, Scott. What's the Yeah. Speaker 2: I mean, we we've moved on from Trump Derangement Syndrome to Elon Derangement Syndrome. Derangement Syndrome. Speaker 0: I'm sorry. Do you wanna defend anything? Speaker 2: There's ample Speaker 0: The Germans get to this let him finish, Catherine. Speaker 2: I love I love this game we play where you talk for 2 minutes, I talk for 3 seconds, and you freak out. So so he has a long record of supporting the Jewish people, number 1. Number 2, anybody who is asserting this, thing he did on the stage the other day was a sig heil, which I just heard you say. You know, lawyer up maybe because absolute ridiculous thing to say under no circumstances. Speaker 0: In Germany thought it was a sig heil. Under no sir The Nazis in Germany Speaker 2: thought it was a sig heil. Was he doing anything other than expressing enthusiastically Why Speaker 1: did she do it on TV right now? Speaker 2: Is appreciating that. Speaker 0: Why don't Speaker 1: she do it on Speaker 0: TV right now? Do you think it's so Speaker 2: Number 3. So Speaker 0: you know, that number that is canal. Speaker 2: Number 3. I think it is fully You know? Number 3. I think it is fully appropriate, and I, of course, have been the strongest supporter of the Jewish people on this network for over a year since October 7th. Is that true? To remember to remember the Holocaust and to remember the atrocities committed against the Jewish people. And I also think it's appropriate to remember the atrocities committed against them right now. Speaker 1: And it seems to me let Speaker 2: me just finish my point. Speaker 1: It seems to me I won't let you change the subject. It seems to me. Address what Speaker 2: we're talking about. Speaker 0: As the Jew at this table Speaker 1: I'm trying I'm trying Speaker 0: to finish my point. Point. Speaker 2: The people who are most concerned about and the most all over Elon Musk today have had nary a word for the Nazis on college campuses who've gone crazy for the last year and a half. Speaker 0: That is full. Speaker 2: That is full. Nothing. Speaker 0: I am a Jew.
libsoftiktok
Posted - February 12, 2025 at 4:03 PM
Saved - February 12, 2025 at 7:02 PM

@libsoftiktok - Libs of TikTok

“Trump and Elon with his kid giving a press conference is odd” Same people https://t.co/gzfTty9bHp

@neeratanden - Neera Tanden🌻

Anyone else find this whole display odd?

america
Posted - February 14, 2025 at 11:07 PM
Saved - February 15, 2025 at 2:20 PM

@america - America

President Trump discusses how legacy media attempted and failed to drive he and Elon Musk apart. https://t.co/Qo1hP5wlxH

Video Transcript AI Summary
The media and punditry threw everything they had at me, but they didn't win. Now they want to drive a wedge between Elon and me, even suggesting I've ceded control of the presidency to him. But it's so obvious what they're doing. They're not even good at it. If they were, I never would have become president. I get 98% bad publicity, but the people are smart. They see what's happening.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Aware, you have to be keenly aware that the media and and the punditry class, not that you know, I think you've proven they have no power anymore, because they threw everything they had at you, and they didn't win. And that was, you know, the New York Times, Washington Post, three networks, every late night comedy show, two cable channels. They they just threw they threw everything, lawfare, weaponization. And now I see they want you two to start they they want a divorce. They want you two to start hating each other, and they try oh, President Elon Musk, for example. You do know that they're doing that to you. Speaker 1: Oh, I see it all the time. They they tried it, then they stopped. That wasn't they have many different things, of hatred. Actually, Elon called me. He said, you know, they're trying to drive us apart. I said, absolutely. No. They said, we have breaking news. Donald Trump has ceded control of the presidency to Elon Musk. President Musk will be attending a cabinet meeting tonight at 08:00. And I say Yeah. It's just so obvious. They're so bad at it. I used to think they were good at it. They're actually bad at it because if they were good at it, I'd never be president. Because I I think nobody in history has ever gotten more bad publicity than me. I could do the greatest things. I get 98% bad publicity. I could do outside of you Speaker 0: and a Speaker 1: few of your very good friends. Right. It's like the craziest thing. But you know what I have learned, Elon? The people are smart. They get it. Speaker 0: Yeah. They do actually. Speaker 1: They get it. They really see what's happening. Yes.
VigilantFox
Posted - February 19, 2025 at 8:52 PM
Saved - February 20, 2025 at 2:03 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I recently watched a heated debate on CNN where I challenged Dr. Paul Offit on his financial ties to the pharmaceutical industry while discussing vaccine safety. I highlighted how conflicts of interest undermine public trust and questioned the focus on measles over pressing health issues like obesity and chronic disease. Despite Offit's assertions about vaccine safety, I argued that the media often overlooks critical health concerns. The segment ended abruptly, showcasing how mainstream media struggles when confronted with challenging viewpoints.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Calley Means Stuns CNN Viewers With Two Devastating Takedowns Live on Air Paul Offit and Pamela Brown came prepared for a debate. What they received was a reckoning. 🧵 THREAD https://t.co/iUBRquJ8Hf

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Calley Means (@CalleyMeans), ex-pharma consultant turned industry critic, came out swinging on CNN Wednesday in a fiery debate against infamous vaccine pusher Dr. Paul Offit. Offit thought he could call RFK Jr. an anti-vaxxer without his own financial ties to the pharmaceutical industry being exposed—but he was wrong. Things immediately got heated when Means exposed Offit’s shocking conflicts of interest on live TV while CNN’s Pamela Brown stood by and let it happen like a deer caught in headlights. “What’s causing distrust in public health authorities is conflicts of interest, like Dr. Offit taking millions of dollars from pharmaceutical makers like Merck while approving and recommending pharmaceuticals on ACIP committees. “Dr. Offit says that science is always settled when he himself has approved vaccines that have been recalled for causing organ failure in kids. “Dr. Offit is talking about measles… But there were 300 deaths from measles a year before the invention of the vaccine. We have 38% of children right now with prediabetes. Bobby is focused on that. He’s focused on reorganizing the department. And that’s what we should be talking about, not this distraction,” Means argued.

Video Transcript AI Summary
What's causing distrust in public health isn't the idea of public health itself, but the actions of its leaders. We need to address the conflicts of interest, like Dr. Offit taking millions from pharmaceutical companies while approving their products. It's also about holding people accountable when they make definitive statements about science, yet have approved products, like vaccines, that have later been recalled for causing harm. While measles is important, let's remember that before the vaccine, there were 300 deaths a year from measles. Today, we have a much bigger problem, with 38% of children having prediabetes. It is important that we focus on reorganizing the department to address issues like this, instead of being distracted.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Trust in public health. No. It it it's the public health leaders themselves. It's people defending with the record that's happening to health at HHS. Why cuts are bad? Of course, we should make cuts. Of course, the personnel should be changed. What's causing distrust in public health authorities is conflict of interest, like doctor Offutt taking millions of dollars from pharmaceutical makers like Merck while approving and recommending pharmaceuticals on ACIP committees. It's the fact that doctor Offutt's saying that science is always settled, when he himself has approved vaccines that have been recalled for causing organ failure for kids. And it's the fact that doctor Offit is talking about measles, which is important. And I wanna be clear, Hamel. I don't wanna get this out. It's important. But there were three hundred deaths from measles a year before the invention of the vaccine. We have thirty eight percent of children right now having prediabetes. Bobby is focused on that. He's focused on reorganizing the department, and that's what we should be talking about, not this distraction.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@calleymeans After Offit finished uncomfortably smiling during Means’ rebuke, he responded to the claims, saying, “I don’t have a relationship with a pharmaceutical company.” https://t.co/Z2KBFVNh7P

Video Transcript AI Summary
I serve on the FDA's vaccine advisory committee because I don't have relationships with pharmaceutical companies, which is a requirement. I actually agree with some of the concerns raised, such as obesity rates, chronic illnesses, and overmedication of children. I even wrote a book about the excesses of modern medicine. However, I strongly disagree with the claim that vaccines are harmful, as RFK Jr. suggests. RFK Jr. continues to falsely claim that vaccines cause autism, and he's now targeting childhood vaccines, which will ultimately harm children.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Made a lot of claims there. I want you to respond to that. And we should note, you are a member of the FDA vaccine advisory committee, and you recently told CNN that RFK junior will hurt America's vaccine infrastructure. So please respond to that and tell us Speaker 1: And, Pamela, I hope we can disclose his I hope we can disclose his millions of dollars of pharmaceutical payments while serving in that committee. Speaker 0: Okay. Doctor Offit, please go ahead and respond. Speaker 1: Well, first of all, you're not allowed to serve on the FDA's vaccine advisory committee if you have a relationship with a pharmaceutical company. And so because I don't have a relationship with a pharmaceutical company, I'm able to serve on that committee. Secondly, and most importantly, actually, the things that that, that Cali talks about, I actually agree with in some ways. I think that we are, for example, more obese as a country than than we should be. And that the consequence of obesity like hypertension and type two diabetes, I think we do have, in many ways, more chronic illnesses. I think we overmedicate our children. I think there's many things we can do better. I actually wrote a book called Overkill When Modern Medicine Goes Too Far. So I agree with all that. What I don't agree with is that in any way, vaccines are are, harmful as RFK Jr says. I mean, RFK Jr continues to claim that vaccines cause autism when they don't. He's now made childhood vaccines a major target of this. And and that's that's, only gonna be to the detriment of children. Speaker 0: Hold on. No. No. Callie Callie, I have to let doctor Offit speak. This has to be a civil respectful conversation in order for this to work and for Americans, peep viewers to to soak this up. So I wanna let Doctor Offit finish and then I'll go to you, Callie, I promise. Go ahead Doctor Offit.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

But Means later questioned: “Is it appropriate for a member of a government advisory committee (ACIP) to have a $1.5 million salary paid by Merck and receive millions in pharma royalties while he’s issuing guidance on products those companies make?” https://t.co/uSf5aMFZoL

@calleymeans - Calley Means

Is it appropriate for a member of a government advisory committee to have a $1.5 million salary paid by Merck and receive millions in pharma royalties while he’s issuing guidance on products those companies make? https://t.co/Slm88xdWyH

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

NEW: CNN frantically interrupts Calley Means as he exposes Paul Offit’s conflicts of interest and Big Pharma’s incentive to keep people sick. The direction of the conversation clearly had Pamela Brown on edge. @CalleyMeans: “Dr. Offit, as you know, you were the chair at the…

Video Transcript AI Summary
I am for addressing issues like obesity and overmedicating children. Bobby Kennedy is fighting against the incentive for Pharma to profit from sick children. They don't make money when kids are healthy, and chronic disease is good for the health industry's bottom line. I support getting soda off of SNAP. When the data aren't on their side, RFK Jr. and personal injury lawyers attack the person. I don't have a conflict of interest. The Merck chair is defined by Penn, and there is no quid pro quo with an endowed chair. The science continually shows RFK Jr. is wrong about vaccines.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: He talked about childhood vaccines, number one. He talked about electromagnetic radiation, number two. He talked about pesticides. He didn't talk about the things that Cali's talking about here, which is things like obesity or overmedicating children or sugar drapes. I'm all for that. I agree with you. You can have both Speaker 1: powerful he gave a he gave a powerful speech about these issues. This this is what Bobby Kinney is fighting against, doctor Offit. As you know, you were the chair at the Children's Hospital, the Merck chair. You you it was like a NASCAR driver wearing their sponsors. Merck paid your $1,500,000 salary. And this is what Bobby is saying, is that fundamentally, pharma can create good innovations, but they're foundationally incentivized for children to be sick. Pharma doesn't make money when children are healthy. The hospitals don't make money when the beds are empty. Chronic disease, just as a demonstrable statement of economic fact, is a great economic invention for the health industry which demonstrably makes money when patients are sick. And that's an incentive Bobby Kennedy is going hard after. I'm in Florida. I'm in I'm in a state senator's office right now. I'm actually lobbying for the state's SNAP bills, which Bobby is really supporting, to get soda off of SNAP. I think the problem is that the public health community, the Merck chairs of pediatricians, I mean, that is just insane. Merck does not have children's interest at heart. Merck itself has settled billions of dollars in criminal penalties for misleading and to know. Speaker 2: For transparency, you used to be a pharmaceutical rep. Right, Cali? Speaker 1: No. No. No. I was there about thirteen years ago with a was a was a lobbyist, which which included Speaker 2: So you were a lobbyist for pharmaceuticals. Okay. Speaker 1: That out. Speaker 2: Right. But really quick, we we do have to go. But doctor Offit, I have to have you respond to his claims about Merck and your ties. Speaker 0: Sure. What he does is what RFK Jr. Does, which is what all personal injury lawyer types do, which is when the the data aren't on their side, then they attack the person. I'm not Bobby Kennedy's ears. Speaker 2: Hold on. Hold on, Callie. Let him talk. Chair? Callie, please. Please. Speaker 0: I I wanna I don't receive a a okay. It's it's it's I do not have a conflict of interest. The Merc chair is is defined defined by, Penn. And Penn, there is no quid pro quo to being having an endowed chair. Anybody who receives an endowed chair an endowed chair would know. Secondly, it's like because they they there aren't the data on their side regarding vaccines. They do what all personal injury lawyer types do, which is attack the witness. I'm not RFK Jr's problem. The science that has continually shown he's wrong about vaccines Speaker 1: for sure. Millions of people. That. That's Speaker 2: the problem. Thank you both for coming on. Thank you for Speaker 0: coming again. Of Speaker 2: Okay. Callie, I let you say your piece, doctor Offit. I let you also respond, and I I appreciate you coming on for this spirited discussion, shall we say? Thank you for joining us. We'll be right back.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Offit went on to say that he doesn’t know what the cause of autism is, mentioning several “interesting” theories. However, he stated with certainty that vaccines are “the one thing that doesn’t cause autism.” “Vaccines, I think, are really the safest, best-tested things that we give to children,” Offit said.

Video Transcript AI Summary
RFK Jr. continues to falsely claim that vaccines cause autism, and he's made childhood vaccines a major target. This is dangerous and will lead to the death of children. When RFK Jr. says we have more chronic diseases in children than ever before, he's citing the instance of autism spectrum disorder. There are many interesting causes of autism spectrum disorder, like the infant microbiome, genetics, or medicines that pregnant people take during their pregnancy. But by focusing on childhood vaccines, he's focusing on the one thing that doesn't cause autism. Vaccines are really the safest, best-tested things that we give to children, and that's what is making America healthy. To focus on vaccines as a target and claim that they're causing harm when they're not is only a detriment to America's children.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What I don't agree with is that in any way, vaccines are are, harmful as RFK Jr. Says. I mean, RFK Jr. Continues to claim that vaccines cause autism when they don't. He's now made childhood vaccines a major target of this. And and that's that's, only gonna be for the death of children. Hold on. Speaker 1: No. No. Callie Callie, I have to let doctor Offit speak. This has to be a civil respectful conversation in order for this to work and for Americans viewers to to soak this up. So I wanna let doctor Offit finish, and then I'll go to you, Cali. I promise. Go ahead, doctor Offit. Speaker 0: So I I think that when, for example, he says we have more chronic diseases in children than ever before, he says that the instance is one in thirty six. Well, that's the instance of autism spectrum disorder. There's a lot of interesting, cause or causes of autism spectrum disorder, like the infant microbiome or genetic or, medicines that women or pregnant people can take during their pregnancy. That's interesting. But by focusing on childhood vaccines, he's focusing on the one thing that doesn't cause autism. And so vaccines, I think, are really the safest, best tested things that we give to children, and that's what make is making America healthy again. And I think to focus on vaccines as as a target and and claim that they're causing harms when they're not is only a detriment to America's children.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

The next disaster for CNN unfolded when host Pamela Brown asked @CalleyMeans a vaccination question that completely backfired. Means flipped the script, using her question to highlight how the media obsesses over “measles” instead of focusing on health concerns that truly matter. PAMELA BROWN: “Is now a time to promote vaccines... especially among children who are being impacted by measles in places like Texas and in these six states where, according to health officials, they are unvaccinated?" CALLEY MEANS: “Pamela, with respect, why aren’t you asking me about the fact that 50% of teens have obesity? There are breathless segments being run and seen on [infectious disease] day after day after day, Pamela. It’s breathless coverage of five measles cases. “Why aren’t we asking why 16% of COVID deaths worldwide were Americans when we’re only 4% of the world population? Because the CDC said our immune system—no, it is related, Pamela. And let me say why: because the entire coverage of Bobby Kennedy is around measles. “The Democrats said the word ‘measles’ 25 times in the first hearing and said the words ‘obesity,’ ‘diabetes,’ and ‘chronic disease’ zero times. The HHS priority document under President Biden said the word ‘equity’ 25 times, said the word ‘vaccines’ countless times, and did not say the word ‘obesity’ or ‘diabetes.’ “There is a problem right now because this is not zero-sum. We are focused on a very small subset that’s important—we need good infectious disease management. Bobby Kennedy, Dr. Offit, is not correct. Bobby Kennedy has said one thing about vaccines and one thing only: that they should be studied like any other product. “Dr. Offit, on the ACIP committee, has recommended vaccines that have ended up being recalled for causing mass issues to kids. Bobby Kennedy has written multiple books, not about being anti-vax, but about having good science. And Dr. Offit is calling him anti-vaccine for literally just saying we need studies. “Bobby Kennedy is not concerned with measles. He wants good policies with measles. He wants to attack the 92% of deaths in the United States, which is chronic conditions,” Means said.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Why is everyone so focused on measles when so many other health issues plague our country? The media breathlessly covers five measles cases while ignoring the obesity epidemic affecting 50% of teens. Sixteen percent of COVID deaths worldwide were Americans, but our health priorities seem misdirected. The focus on measles is overshadowing other critical health concerns. Bobby Kennedy's stance isn't anti-vaccine; he simply advocates for rigorous studies on vaccines, like any other product. He, and others, are concerned with the chronic conditions responsible for 92% of deaths in the United States, and want to address the bigger picture of health policy.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Is it now a time to promote vaccines, which again, the CDC says safe effective that two doses are ninety percent effective against measles? Is it now a time to promote that especially among children who are being impacted by measles in places like Texas and in these states who are unvaccinated according to health officials. Speaker 1: Pamela, with with respect, why aren't you asking me about the fact that fifty percent of teens have obesity? Why aren't there there there are breathless Speaker 0: I have other questions for you, but we're talking about this. Speaker 1: Day after day after day, Pamela. It's breathless coverage of five measles cases. Why aren't we asking why sixteen percent of COVID deaths worldwide were Americans when we're only four percent of the world population because the CDC said, Our immune system, no, it is related, Pamela, and let me say why. Because the entire coverage of Bobby Kennedy is around measles. The Democrats said the word measles twenty five times in the first hearing and said the words obesity, diabetes, and chronic disease zero time. The HHS priority document under President Biden said the word equity 25 times, said the word vaccines countless times, did not say the word obesity or diabetes. There is a problem right now because this is not zero, this is zero sum. We are focused on a very small subset that's important. We need good infectious disease management. Bobby Kennedy, Doctor. Offit is not correct. Bobby Kennedy has said one thing about vaccines and one thing only, that they should be studied like any other product. Doctor. Offit on the ACIP committee has recommended vaccines that have ended up being recalled for causing mass issues to kids. Bobby Kennedy has written multiple books not about being anti vaxx but about having good science. And Doctor. Offit is calling him anti vaccine for literally just saying we need studies. Bobby Kennedy is not concerned with measles. He wants good policies with measles. He wants to attack the ninety two percent of deaths in The United States, which has chronic conditions.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Means continued to hammer the medical industry, exposing how it “doesn’t make money when children are healthy.” “Pharma doesn’t make money when children are healthy. The hospitals don’t make money when the beds are empty. Chronic disease, just as a demonstrable statement of economic fact, is a great economic invention for the healthcare industry, which demonstrably makes money when patients are sick,” Means said. Visibly frustrated as @CalleyMeans dismantled the narrative CNN wanted to push, Pamela Brown began frantically cutting him off before abruptly ending the segment, calling it a “spirited discussion.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
I support discussing issues like obesity and overmedicating children. Bobby Kennedy is fighting against the incentive for pharma to profit from sick children, and he's supporting efforts to remove soda from SNAP. The problem is that organizations like Merck don't have children's best interests at heart, considering their history of criminal penalties for misleading information. When the data isn't on their side, RFK Jr. and personal injury lawyers attack the person. My Merck chair is defined by Penn, and there's no quid pro quo. The science continually proves RFK Jr. wrong about vaccines.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: He talked about childhood vaccines, number one. He talked about electromagnetic radiation, number two. He talked about pesticides. He didn't talk about the things that Cali's talking about here, which is things like obesity or overmedicating children or sugar drapes. I'm all for that. I agree with you. You can have both Speaker 1: powerful he gave a he gave a powerful speech about these issues. This this is what Bobby Kinney is fighting against, doctor Offit. As you know, you were the chair at the Children's Hospital, the Merck chair. You you it was like a NASCAR driver wearing their sponsors. Merck paid your $1,500,000 salary. And this is what Bobby is saying, is that fundamentally, pharma can create good innovations, but they're foundationally incentivized for children to be sick. Pharma doesn't make money when children are healthy. The hospitals don't make money when the beds are empty. Chronic disease, just as a demonstrable statement of economic fact, is a great economic invention for the health industry which demonstrably makes money when patients are sick. And that's an incentive Bobby Kennedy is going hard after. I'm in Florida. I'm in I'm in a state senator's office right now. I'm actually lobbying for the state's SNAP bills, which Bobby is really supporting, to get soda off of SNAP. I think the problem is that the public health community, the Merck chairs of pediatricians, I mean, that is just insane. Merck does not have children's interest at heart. Merck itself has settled billions of dollars in criminal penalties for misleading and to know. Speaker 2: For transparency, you used to be a pharmaceutical rep. Right, Cali? Speaker 1: No. No. No. I was there about thirteen years ago with a was a was a lobbyist, which which included Speaker 2: So you were a lobbyist for pharmaceuticals. Okay. Speaker 1: That out. Speaker 2: Right. But really quick, we we do have to go. But doctor Offit, I have to have you respond to his claims about Merck and your ties. Speaker 0: Sure. What he does is what RFK Jr. Does, which is what all personal injury lawyer types do, which is when the the data aren't on their side, then they attack the person. I'm not Bobby Kennedy's ears. Speaker 2: Hold on. Hold on, Callie. Let him talk. Chair? Callie, please. Please. Speaker 0: I I wanna I don't receive a a okay. It's it's it's I do not have a conflict of interest. The Merc chair is is defined defined by, Penn. And Penn, there is no quid pro quo to being having an endowed chair. Anybody who receives an endowed chair an endowed chair would know. Secondly, it's like because they they there aren't the data on their side regarding vaccines. They do what all personal injury lawyer types do, which is attack the witness. I'm not RFK Jr's problem. The science that has continually shown he's wrong about vaccines Speaker 1: for sure. Millions of people. That. That's Speaker 2: the problem. Thank you both for coming on. Thank you for Speaker 0: coming again. Of Speaker 2: Okay. Callie, I let you say your piece, doctor Offit. I let you also respond, and I I appreciate you coming on for this spirited discussion, shall we say? Thank you for joining us. We'll be right back.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

This debate made one thing clear: when mainstream news networks face someone who can challenge their narratives in real time, their arguments crumble, leaving viewers exposed to the truth. While it’s safe to say that @CalleyMeans won’t be invited back on CNN anytime soon, this segment should serve as a stark reminder that the media’s goal is to push narratives, not to report the truth or host an honest debate.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@calleymeans Click here to watch the full debate below: https://t.co/g0bStZqgU0

@BeauJarvis13 - Beau Jarvis

@calleymeans Here’s the CNN Clip! https://t.co/a8xAwGkSjM

Video Transcript AI Summary
I defend public health leaders and question why cuts are bad for health at HHS. Distrust stems from conflicts of interest, like Dr. Offit taking money from pharmaceutical companies while recommending drugs. He claims science is settled, yet approved vaccines have been recalled. I want focus on real issues: 38% of children having prediabetes. Measles deaths were high before vaccines, but chronic conditions are a bigger threat now. RFK Jr. isn't anti-vaccine but wants vaccine studies. I question why media covers measles over obesity and diabetes. Sixteen percent of COVID deaths were American, but the CDC didn't discuss metabolic links. I support measures like removing soda from SNAP, aiming for better health policies. Pharma profits from sick children, incentivizing chronic disease.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Trust in public health? No. It it it's the public health leaders themselves. It's people defending with the record that's happening to health at HHS why cuts are bad. Of course, we should make cuts. Of course, the personnel should be changed. What's causing distrust in public health authorities is conflict of interest, like doctor Offutt taking millions of dollars from pharmaceutical makers like Merck while approving and recommending pharmaceuticals on ACIP committees. It's the fact that doctor Offutt's saying that science is always settled, when he himself has approved vaccines that have been recalled for causing organ failure for kids. And it's the fact that doctor Offit is talking about measles, which is important. And I wanna be clear, Hamlet. I don't wanna get this out. It's important. But there were three hundred deaths from measles a year before the invention of the vaccine. We have thirty eight percent of children now having prediabetes. Bobby is focused on that. He's focused on reorganizing the department. Mhmm. And that's what we should be talking about, not this distraction. Speaker 1: And I'm gonna come back to you on that central question about the measles and and the bird flu and whether cuts right now are are makes sense. But I want you, doctor Offit, obviously, he made a lot of claims there. I want you to respond to that. And we should note, you are a member of the FDA vaccine advisory committee, and you recently told CNN that RFK Jr will hurt America's vaccine infrastructure. So please respond to that and tell us Speaker 0: And, Pamela, I hope we can disclose his I hope we can disclose his millions of dollars of pharmaceutical payments while serving in that committee. Speaker 1: Okay. Doctor Offit, please go ahead and respond. Speaker 2: Well, first of all, you're not allowed to serve on the FDA's vaccine advisory committee if you have a relationship with a pharmaceutical company. And so because I don't have a relationship with a pharmaceutical company, I'm able to serve on that committee. Secondly, and most importantly, actually, the things that that, that Cali talks about, I actually agree with in some ways. I think that we are, for example, more obese as a country than than we should be. And that the consequence of obesity like hypertension or type two diabetes, I think we do have, in many ways, more chronic illnesses. I think we overmedicate our children. I think there's many things we can do better. I actually wrote a book called Overkill When Modern Medicine Goes Too Far. So I agree with all that. What I don't agree with is that in any way, vaccines are are, harmful as RFK Jr. Says. I mean, RFK Jr. Continues to claim that vaccines cause autism when they don't. He's now made childhood vaccines a major target of this. And and that's that's, only to be the detriment of children. Speaker 1: Hold on. No. No. Callie Callie, I have to let doctor Offit speak. This has to be a civil respectful conversation in order for this to work and for Americans, viewers to to soak this up. So I wanna let doctor Offit finish, and then I'll go to you, Cali. I promise. Go ahead, doctor Offit. Speaker 2: So I I think that when, for example, he says we have more chronic diseases in children than ever before, he says that the incidence is one in thirty six. Well, that's the incidence of autism spectrum disorder. There's a lot of interesting, cause or causes of autism spectrum disorder, like the infant microbiome or genetic or medicines that women or pregnant people can take during their pregnancy. That's interesting. But by focusing on childhood vaccines, he's focusing on the one thing that doesn't cause autism. And so vaccines, I think, are really the safest, best tested things that we give to children, and that's what may is making America healthy again. And I think to focus on vaccines as as a target and and claim that they're causing harms when they're not is only a detriment to America's children. Speaker 0: And just Speaker 1: to be clear, these are two separate issue. There's vaccines which are proven safe and effective, and we're gonna talk more about that. But then there's the issue of chronic disease caused by, you know, the food that we're consuming, processed food and all of that, which as you both agree on, that needs to be dealt with, that needs to be a a priority, of course, which is why in many ways RFK Jr has gained so much popularity among many Americans, on that issue. But but I wanna go to you, Callie, to respond. And, also, you know, with this measles threat, is it now a time to promote vaccines, which, again, the CDC says safe effective that two doses are ninety percent effective against measles? Is it now a time to promote that, especially among children who are being impacted by measles in places like Texas and in these six states who are unvaccinated according to health officials? Speaker 0: Pamela, with with respect, why aren't you asking me about the fact that fifty percent of teens have obesity? Why aren't Speaker 1: there there there are questions for you, but we're talking about this. Speaker 0: Day after day after day, Pamela, it's breathless it's breathless coverage of of of of five measles cases. We why aren't we asking why sixteen percent of COVID deaths worldwide were Americans when we're only four percent of the world population because the CDC said our immune system. No. It is related, Pamela, and let me say why. Because the entire coverage of Bobby Kennedy is around measles. The Democrat said the word measles twenty five times in the first hearing and said the words obesity, diabetes, and chronic disease zero time. The HHS priority document under president Biden said the word equity 25 times, said the word vaccines countless times, did not say the word obesity or diabetes. There is a problem right now because this is not zero, this is zero sum. We are focused on a very small subset that's important. We need good infectious disease management. Bobby Kennedy, Doctor. Offit is not correct. Bobby Kennedy has said one thing about vaccines and one thing only, that they should be studied like any other product. Doctor Offit on the ACEF committee has recommended vaccines that have ended up being recalled for causing mass issues to kids. Bobby Kennedy has written multiple books not about being anti vaxxed, but about having good science. And doctor Offutt is calling him anti vaccine for literally just saying we need studies. Bobby Kennedy is not concerned with measles. He wants good policies with measles. He wants to attack the ninety two percent of deaths in The United States, which is chronic conditions. Speaker 1: I I think it is fair to say given his history in his past remarks though that he is, at the very least, a vaccine skeptic. Alright? A vaccine skeptic is is fair to say. I think he's a science Speaker 0: pro science advocate. Speaker 1: Okay. And and again, doctor Offit, I want you to respond to some of those claims. And, Callie, look, we can we can talk about all of this, and I do wanna talk about obesity. So don't make a claim that I'm not asking about important things because I've covered that on this show. I've covered the movement about what Kellogg's what they're trying to do with Kellogg's and trying to take food coloring out of Kellogg's. I've actually been on the forefront of covering a lot of these issues, so please don't make that claim I'm not asking the right questions. Speaker 0: Worry. I will I will say during COVID, CNN covered this as a pharmaceutical deficiency and did not talk about the metabolic links to COVID and how this really was a warning sign for our immune system. I agree, Pamela. You have covered this issue more than most. But Okay. There is a massive slant talking about measles rather than chronic conditions. Speaker 1: Okay. And that's your and that's your your point of view, and you're you're entitled to that. And on this show, we try to share all kinds of points of view and and different ways of looking at things. Thank you. So I wanna go to this 2016 USDA report that shows sugary beverages are the second most purchased items by households that receive SNAP benefits, while desserts are the fifth most purchased. Senator Mike Lee has introduced the Healthy SNAP Act, which would exclude these items from SNAP. Doctor, do you think that that's important, a bill like this? Are you in favor of that? Speaker 2: Sure. I I mean, I think that it it's certainly true that we we can have better health. I think, you know, that we we do have an increased instance of obesity. I think that things like I think we overmedicate our children in many ways. I think that people are reasonably dissatisfied with the health care system. I think we don't get great bang for our buck with with what we spend per capita. I think we compared to other developed world countries, we don't have the same, length of, say, like, length of, like, longevity or infant mortality rates don't compare favorably. Sure. That's all true. And I think you can have that and also say how important vaccines are. What worries me about our FK Jr, which is why I think he shouldn't be ahead of HHS, is he has been a virulent anti vaccine activist for the last twenty years. And and when he stands in front of of the the HHS, a couple days ago, what did he talk about? He talked about childhood vaccines, number one. He talked about electromagnetic radiation, number two. He talked about pesticides. He didn't talk about the things that Cali's talking about here, which is things like obesity or over medicating children or sugar drape. I'm all for that. I agree with you. You can have both. Speaker 0: Powerful he gave a he gave a powerful speech about these issues. This this is what Bobby Kinney's fighting against, doctor Oph. As you know, you were the chair at the Children's Hospital, the Merck chair. You you it was like a NASCAR driver wearing their sponsors. Merck paid your $1,500,000 salary. And this is what Bobby is saying, is that fundamentally, pharma can create good innovations, but they're foundationally incentivized for children to be sick. Pharma doesn't make money when children are healthy. The hospitals don't make money when the beds are empty. Chronic disease, just as a demonstrable statement of economic fact, is a great economic invention for the health industry, which demonstrably makes money when patients are sick, and that's an incentive Bobby Kennedy is going hard after. I'm in Florida. I'm in I'm in a state senator's office right now. I'm actually lobbying for the state's SNAP bills, which Bobby is really supporting, to get soda off of Snap. I think the problem is that the public health community, the Merck shares of pediatricians, I mean, that is just insane. Merck does not have children's interest at heart. Merck itself has settled billions of dollars in criminal penalties for misleading and falsifying data in the past ten years. Like like, what Speaker 1: do you mean by that? For for transparency, you used to be a pharmaceutical rep. Right, Cali? Speaker 0: No. No. No. I was about thirteen years ago with the was a was a lobbyist, which included So Speaker 1: you were a lobbyist for pharmaceuticals. Speaker 0: Okay. That out. Speaker 1: Right. But really quick, we we do have to go. But doctor Offit, I have to have you respond to his claims about Merck and your ties. Speaker 2: Sure. What he does is what RFK Jr. Does, which is what all personal injury lawyer types do, which is when the the data aren't on their side, then they attack the person. I'm not driving any chairs. Speaker 1: Hold on. Hold on, Callie. Let him Speaker 0: talk. Chair? Speaker 1: Callie, please. Please. Speaker 2: I I wanna I don't receive a a okay. It's it's it's I do not have a conflict of interest. The Merck chair is is defined defined by, Penn. And Penn, there is no quid pro quo to being having an endowed chair. Is anybody who receives an endowed chair an endowed chair would know. Secondly, it's like because they they there aren't the data on their side regarding vaccines. They do what all personal injury lawyer types do, which is attack the witness. I'm not RFK Jr's problem. The science that has continually shown me is wrong about vaccines for sure. Speaker 0: To speak to me about that. Okay. Alright. Speaker 1: Thank you both for coming on. Again, okay, Cali. I let you say your piece, doctor Offit. I let you also respond, and I I appreciate you coming on for this spirited discussion, shall we say? Thank you for joining us. We'll be right back. Speaker 2: Our thoughts and prayers are with those who is

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@calleymeans Thanks for reading! If you enjoyed this report, please do me a quick favor and follow me (@VigilantFox) for more posts like this one. In other news, Elon Musk recently shut down RFK Jr. critics with one profound statement. Read more below: https://t.co/dcrDfMmMzy

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Elon Musk Delivers a Powerful Statement on Bobby Kennedy Jr. Plus, more must-see moments from the Trump-Musk interview. 🧵 THREAD https://t.co/AVPelCMAbh

nicksortor
Posted - March 7, 2025 at 8:37 PM
Saved - March 7, 2025 at 11:12 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I just saw President Trump call out an NBC reporter for falsely claiming there was a clash between Elon Musk and Marco Rubio. He emphasized there was no clash and accused the reporter of being a troublemaker. It seems like they're really trying to create division between Elon and Trump, but it's not working.

@nicksortor - Nick Sortor

🚨 President Trump just SLAMMED a fake news NBC reporter for claiming there was a “CLASH” between Elon Musk and Marco Rubio during a cabinet meeting “No clash. I was there. You're just a troublemaker” They’re trying SO hard to rip Elon and Trump apart, and it ain’t working. These attempts are getting incredibly desperate

Video Transcript AI Summary
There was no clash between the secretaries, despite what you may have heard. You're just stirring up trouble and asking irrelevant questions. We're here to discuss the World Cup. Elon and Marco are working well together and doing an excellent job. There is no conflict between them. I won't answer your question about who I support; it's off-topic. Of course, you're with NBC. That explains your line of questioning. That's enough. Let's keep the discussion focused on the World Cup. Are there any other relevant questions?
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Clashes eventually. New secretary removed the other secretary. No clash. I was there. You're just a troublemaker. And you're not supposed to be asking that question because we're talking about the World Cup. Elon gets along great with Marco, and they're both doing a fantastic job. There is no clash. Mister president, who's bottom line Who are you with? Who are you with? NBC. Oh, no wonder. That's enough. NBC. Who has more authority? Elon Musk or the captaincy chair? Any other questions about the World Cup?
acnewsitics
Posted - March 21, 2025 at 4:10 PM
Saved - March 21, 2025 at 5:00 PM

@acnewsitics - Alex Cole

Trump calls it fake, Elon calls it a leak—somebody is lying. https://t.co/5T6zWoxVjq

Bubblebathgirl
Posted - June 5, 2025 at 4:34 PM
Saved - June 5, 2025 at 9:01 PM

@Bubblebathgirl - Paul A. Szypula 🇺🇸

President Trump talks about Elon Musk. The media will try to take what he said here and turn it into a big deal. It’s not. I trust both Trump and Elon. I don’t think either men are the problem. You want to know who the real problem is? Congress. https://t.co/SMjLSZWFlb

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims to have had a great relationship with Elon, but is now disappointed. He believes Elon only developed a problem with the "great big beautiful bill" after the EV mandate was cut, which Elon knew about and initially supported. The speaker says the CBO, which is run by Democrats, projects a $2.8 trillion surplus over ten years if tariff revenue is included. He touts low inflation, down to 2%, and falling grocery and gasoline prices. He also claims the U.S. now has the best border in history with a 99.99% success rate. He speculates that people who leave his administration miss the "glamour" and become hostile, possibly due to "Trump derangement syndrome." He suggests that Elon may be experiencing something similar.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we're well anymore. I was surprised because you were here. Everybody in this room practically was here as we had a wonderful send off. He said wonderful things about me. You couldn't have nicer, said the best thing. He's worn the hat. Trump was right about everything. And I am right about the the great big beautiful bill. We call it a great big beautiful bill because that's what it is. And, again, biggest tax cuts in history, biggest economic development moves anywhere. We've never done anything like it. Business is spurred. And I don't know if you've seen the numbers, but the numbers came out. Even the CBO, which is run by Democrats, said that we're gonna be, doing you know, I'd like you to discuss it, the 2,800,000,000.0 a trillion that CBO. This is some a group of people that are Democrats. They're very hostile to us. They just came out with phenomenal numbers what it does. You wanna mention that, Scott? Speaker 1: Yes, sir. So what what we've seen is we keep hearing from the CBO that there's going to, be a large deficit from the bill, which we disagree with. But using the CBO scoring, they came out and scored the tariff revenue. We think it'll be the minimum of 2,800,000,000,000.0 over the ten year window, which actually puts the bill in surplus if you include the tariff revenue, which they won't do. Speaker 0: It gives you a tremendous surplus, but we're not allowed to use that. For some reason, they say scoring. Nobody knows what scoring means. Maybe a couple of people, but nobody. Somebody sits in the background, they say, well, we're not gonna allow that. They're not allowing other things that we have that are tremendously profitable for our country. But if you saw the other day, CNBC, they came out with, numbers and the people on the show, very good people. I've watched them for a long time. They couldn't believe the numbers, how good they are. The numbers were incredible. And that was personal income and also very low inflation. We have very low inflation. We're down to 2% now and maybe even lower than that. And when I took it over, was a mess. Remember, we had the worst inflation probably in the history of our country. They say forty eight years, but let's say that's I think it's worse than that. So we had the worst inflation in the history of our country under the Biden administration. Now we're down to beautiful number, 2%. We'd actually like to keep it there. Better than zero is 2%. It's going down maybe to 1% is like perfect. That's perfect. You don't wanna have zero for certain reasons that are that nobody is very interested to listen to, But we have almost perfect inflation. Grocery prices are down. Everything remember eggs eggs. We weren't gonna buy another egg for the next twenty years. It was so expensive. Right? Remember? You guys all hit me about eggs. Eggs have down 400%. Everybody has eggs now. They're having eggs for breakfast again. But if you look at, gasoline, very important. I think always the most important because it's the energy is a big the biggest factor. That's what He screwed up our energy policy and everything went up because energy went up. But now energy is way down and, they have states where you're at $1.98 a gallon for gasoline. So the costs have way have come way down. And one of the things I ran on was that. I ran on the border. We have the best border in the history of our country, 99.99%. It was, last week, three people came in. Two of them for medical reasons. We let them in because one of them had a heart attack. I think it was a nice thing to do, and one of them had something else. So we've never had I had very good numbers for four years, but we we really topped it. And I wanna thank Christie and Tom Homan. They've they've done a fantastic job, but nobody mentions that anymore. Remember, a few months ago, the border was a total disaster. People were coming in by the hundreds of thousands of people a day, a week, a month. I mean, we had a month 2,000,000 people came in in one month. The border was being overrun and a lot of bad people, criminals, murderers, drug dealers. We had some of the worst people in the world coming in from all over the world. It's totally closed. And you know what? People are coming into our country, but they're coming in legally. So we've done a great job. Elon knew that. Elon endorsed me very strongly. He actually went up in campaign for me. I think I would have won. Susie would say I would have won Pennsylvania easily anyway, even if the governor ran, the real governor, not the governor from Minnesota who's I mean, he's a sick puppy. That guy that poor guy feels sorry for him. But they they made a bad choice with him. But if you pick Shapiro or anybody else, I spoke to him recently about his, you know, his house being set on fire, which was terrible. But if they picked him, I would have won Pennsylvania. I won it by a lot. But I'm very disappointed because Elon knew the inner workings of this bill better than almost anybody sitting here, better than you people. He knew everything about it. He had no problem with it. All of a sudden, he had a problem, and he only developed the problem when he found out that we're gonna have to cut the EV mandate because that's billions and billions of dollars, and it really is unfair. We wanna have cars of all types. Electric, we wanna have electric, but we wanna have a gasoline combustion. We wanna have different. We wanna have hybrids. We wanna have all we wanna be able to sell everything. And when that was cut, and congress wanted to cut it, he became a little bit different, and I can understand that. But he knew every aspect of this bill. He knew it better than almost anybody, and he never had a problem until right after he left. And if you saw the statements he made about me, which I'm sure you can get very easily, it's very fresh on tape, he said the most beautiful things about me. And he hasn't said bad about me personally, but I'm sure that'll be next. But I'm I'm very disappointed in Elon. I've helped Elon a lot. Speaker 1: Did that answer the president? Did he I just wanna clarify. Did he raise any of these concerns with you privately before he raised them publicly? And this is the guy you put in charge of cutting spending. Should people not take him seriously about spending now? Are you saying this is all sour grapes? Speaker 0: No. He worked hard, and he did a good job. And I'll be honest, think he misses the place. I think he got out there and all of a sudden he wasn't in this beautiful Oval Office and he was and he's got nice offices too. But there's something about this when I was telling the chancellor, this is where it is. People come in here, even from Germany. They come in and they they Germany. Walk into the Oval Office and it's just a special place. It's you know, World War one, it started and it ended here. And World War two and, so many other things. Everything big comes right from this this beautiful space. It's now much more beautiful than it was six months ago. A lot of good things are happening in this room. And I'll I'll tell you, it's not he's not the first. People leave my administration and they love us. And then at some point, they miss it so badly. And some of them embrace it and some of them actually become hostile. I don't know what it is. It's sort of Trump derangement syndrome, I guess they call it. But I we have it with others too. They leave and they wake up in the morning and the glamour's gone. The whole world is different and they become hostile. I don't know what it is. Someday you'll write a book about it and you'll let us know.
LauraLoomer
Posted - June 5, 2025 at 5:30 PM
Saved - June 5, 2025 at 6:25 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
It's heating up. I'm curious to see how Republican lawmakers will respond. I've spoken to some who are weighing whether to side with President Trump or Elon Musk. I've been on the hill all day, and this is the main topic of conversation—the most powerful man versus the richest man.

@LauraLoomer - Laura Loomer

It’s heating up. Will be interesting to see what Republican lawmakers do now. I know law makers who are asking if they should side with President Trump or Elon. I’ve been on the hill all day and it’s all anyone is talking about. The most powerful man in the world vs the richest man in the world.

LauraLoomer
Posted - June 5, 2025 at 5:30 PM
Saved - June 5, 2025 at 6:26 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Laura Loomer noted a growing tension among Republican lawmakers regarding whether to support President Trump or Elon Musk, highlighting that this topic dominated discussions during her time on Capitol Hill. She emphasized the significance of the situation, framing it as a contest between the most powerful and the richest man in the world. In response, Elon Musk pointed out that while Trump has 3.5 years remaining in his presidency, he himself will be influential for over 40 years.

@LauraLoomer - Laura Loomer

It’s heating up. Will be interesting to see what Republican lawmakers do now. I know law makers who are asking if they should side with President Trump or Elon. I’ve been on the hill all day and it’s all anyone is talking about. The most powerful man in the world vs the richest man in the world.

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

@LauraLoomer Oh and some food for thought as they ponder this question: Trump has 3.5 years left as President, but I will be around for 40+ years …

VigilantFox
Posted - June 5, 2025 at 7:13 PM
Saved - June 5, 2025 at 9:27 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The breakup between Trump and Musk is now official, marked by Trump’s comments about their past relationship and Musk's immediate rebuttals. Trump expressed disappointment over Musk's criticism of the Big Beautiful Bill, attributing it to financial motives related to EV subsidies. Musk countered, claiming Trump’s accusations were false and asserting his significant role in Trump’s election success. The tension escalated with Trump threatening to terminate Musk's government contracts, while Musk hinted at serious allegations against Trump. This unfolding drama highlights a significant political rift.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

The Trump/Musk breakup is now official. For the first time, Trump spoke out after Musk blasted the Big Beautiful Bill. But here’s the twist—Musk was watching live and firing back in real time on X. What happened next was painful to watch. Trump said, “Look, Elon and I had a great relationship. I don’t know if we will anymore.” Then Trump posted on Truth Social—and that’s when the gloves really came off. 🧵 THREAD

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

📍 And make sure to bookmark this thread—because no matter how this ends, we’re watching one of the greatest political alliances fall apart in real time. Let’s break it all down and roll the clips.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

It came out of nowhere, but it hit like a category five hurricane. President Trump was hosting German Chancellor Friedrich Merz when a reporter asked a question that immediately changed the energy in the room: “What’s your reaction to Elon Musk’s criticism of the Big Beautiful Bill?” The mood shifted. Trump didn’t hesitate. It was the beginning of what sounded like a very public political divorce. “I’ve always liked Elon,” Trump said. “So I was very surprised… He hasn’t said anything about me that’s bad.” Trump had stayed quiet for a while, but now, cornered with cameras rolling, he was ready to speak. “I’d rather have him criticize me than the bill,” Trump continued, praising the legislation as “incredible” and “the biggest cut in the history of our country… about $1.6 trillion.” Then came the pivot—and the reason for the rift, according to Trump. “Elon’s upset because we took the EV mandate,” he explained. “That was a lot of money for electric vehicles.” The way Trump described it, Musk’s problem wasn’t ideological—it was financial. “They want us to pay billions of dollars in subsidy. And Elon knew this from the beginning. He knew it a long time ago. That hasn’t changed.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker says he has always liked Elon Musk and is surprised by Musk's criticism regarding the bill. He would rather Musk criticize him than the bill because the bill is incredible, with $1.6 trillion in cuts, the biggest tax cut in history. The bill includes unbelievable benefits for small businesses, people, and middle-income individuals. Musk is upset because the EV mandate, which provided a lot of money for electric vehicles, was removed. Electric vehicle companies are having a hard time and want billions of dollars in subsidies. The speaker claims Musk knew about this from the beginning, and it hasn't changed.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Thank you, mister president. The criticism that I've seen and I'm sure you've seen regarding Elon Musk and your big beautiful bill, what's your reaction to that? Do you think it in any way hurts passage in the senate, which is, of course, what is your seeking? Speaker 1: Well, look, you know, I've always liked Elon, and it's always very surprised. You saw the words he had for me, the words of and he hasn't said anything about me that's bad. I'd rather have him criticize me than the bill because the bill is incredible. It's the biggest cut in the history of our country. We've never cut. It's about 1,600,000,000,000.0 in cuts. It's the biggest tax cut. Tax, you would say, people people's taxes will go way down, but it's the biggest tax cut in history. It's we have we are doing things in that bill that are unbelievable. And when you look at what we're doing for small businesses, for people, for middle income people, all of the things that we're doing, nobody's ever seen anything like it. And, you know, Elon's upset because we took the EV mandate and you know, which was a lot of money for electric vehicles. And, you know, they're having a hard time with electric vehicles, and they want us to pay billions of dollars in subsidy. And, you know, I I Elon knew this from the beginning. He knew it for a long time ago. Speaker 0: That's been in there. That's been, Speaker 1: I would say, JD, that hasn't changed. That's been right from the beginning, mister I think, mister secretary. That hasn't changed at all right from the beginning. But I know that disturbed

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Musk responded to this immediately: “Whatever.” “Keep the EV/solar incentive cuts in the bill, even though no oil & gas subsidies are touched (very unfair!!), but ditch the MOUNTAIN of DISGUSTING PORK in the bill.” https://t.co/DNML9nbj3T

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Before we roll the next clip: if you’re not following me, you’re missing out on critical information. Hit the bell 🔔 to stay sharp and informed. → @VigilantFox Now, back to the story you came for. https://t.co/AfEghwSCHR

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

But the electric vehicle subsidies weren’t the only flashpoint. Trump pointed to another moment of quiet friction. He said Musk had personally pushed for Jared Isaacman to be nominated as NASA administrator. Trump turned him down. “He recommended somebody that he, I guess, knew very well. I’m sure he respected him,” Trump said. “But I didn’t think it was appropriate.” Why? “He happened to be a Democrat. Like, totally Democrat.” Then Trump drew the political line. “We won,” he said. “We get certain privileges. And one of the privileges is we don’t have to appoint a Democrat.” He reiterated that NASA would remain in capable hands. “General Cain is going to be picking somebody.” But the implication was clear: Musk had tried to insert his own pick into a key government role—and when he didn’t get his way, the relationship began to fracture. “He wanted that person. And we said no,” Trump said. “And I can understand why he’s upset.” Then came a striking moment of reflection. “Remember, he was here for a long time. You saw a man who was very happy when he stood behind the Oval Desk.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
He recommended someone he knew and respected to run NASA, but the speaker didn't think it was appropriate because the person was a Democrat. The speaker stated, "We won. We get certain privileges. And one of the privileges, we don't have to appoint a democrat." The speaker said NASA is very important and that General Cain will be picking someone, and they will be checking them out. The speaker understands why the person who made the recommendation is upset, noting "he was here for a long time" and "was very happy when he stood behind the oval desk."
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: He wanted and rightfully, you know, he recommended somebody from, that he, I guess, knew very well. I'm sure he respected him, but to run NASA. And I didn't think it was appropriate. And he happened to be a democrat, like, totally democrat. And I say, you know, look, we won. We get certain privileges. And one of the privileges, we don't have to appoint a democrat. NASA is very important. We have great people. General Cain is gonna be picking somebody with our we'll be we'll be checking them out and seeing, but he wanted that person, a certain person, and we said no. And, you know, I can understand why he's upset. Remember, he was here for a long time. You saw a man who was very happy when he stood behind the oval desk.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

That’s when Trump crossed a line you don’t cross unless something’s truly over, and he dropped a line that made it clear. He started using the past tense. “Look, Elon and I had a great relationship,” he said. “I don’t know if we will anymore.” It was unmistakable. The phrasing, the delivery—it sounded like someone processing a falling-out in real time. Trump recalled better days: public events, warm praise, and headlines they once created together. “I was surprised—because you were here,” he told the room. “Everybody in this room, practically, was here as we had a wonderful sendoff.” “He said wonderful things about me. You couldn’t have said nicer—said the best things.” “He’s worn the hat, ‘Trump Was Right About Everything.’” Then Trump added with a tone of wounded pride: “And I am right about the great, big beautiful bill.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
Elon and the speaker had a great relationship, though the current status is uncertain. The speaker recalls a wonderful send-off where Elon said very nice and the "best" things. Elon wore the hat. The speaker believes Trump was right about everything. The speaker also believes they are right about the "great big beautiful bill," which they describe as the biggest tax cuts in history and the biggest economic development moves anywhere. They claim nothing like it has ever been done before.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Look, Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we're well anymore. I was surprised because you were here. Everybody in this room practically was here as we had a wonderful send off. He said wonderful things about me. You couldn't have nicer. Said the best thing. He's worn the hat. Trump was right about everything. And I am right about the great big beautiful bill. We call it a great big beautiful bill because that's what it is. And, again, biggest tax cuts in history, biggest economic development moves anywhere. We've never done anything like it.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

As the comments continued, the emotion started bleeding through. Trump reminded everyone just how closely tied Musk had been to his movement. “Elon endorsed me very strongly,” he said. “He actually went up and campaigned for me.” But even in that, Trump made something else crystal clear: he believed he didn’t need Musk to win. “I think I would have won,” he said. “Susie would say I would have won Pennsylvania easily anyway.” “Even if the governor ran—the real governor, not the governor from Minnesota… He’s a sick puppy, that guy.” Then he doubled down: “If they picked him, I would have won Pennsylvania. I won it by a lot.” Trump was saying that Musk’s support was appreciated—but not essential. And that made the fallout easier to frame. “I’m very disappointed,” he said. “Because Elon knew the inner workings of this bill better than almost anybody sitting here. Better than you people. He knew everything about it.” He circled back to the heart of the disagreement: the subsidies. “He had no problem with it. All of a sudden he had a problem—when he found out we’re going to have to cut the EV mandate. That’s billions and billions of dollars. And it really is unfair. We want to have cars of all types.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
Elon endorsed the speaker and campaigned for them. The speaker believes they would have won Pennsylvania easily, even if the "real governor" or Shapiro had run. The speaker is disappointed because Elon, who initially knew the bill's inner workings and had no problem with it, suddenly developed a problem when he learned about the EV mandate cut. This cut would save billions of dollars but is considered unfair. The speaker wants cars of all types, including electric, gasoline, combustion, and hybrids, and wants to be able to sell everything. Elon became "different" when Congress wanted to cut the EV mandate, which the speaker understands. Elon knew every aspect of the bill better than almost anybody.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We've done a great job. Elon knew that. Elon endorsed me very strongly. He actually went up and campaigned for me. I think I would have won. Susie would say I would have won Pennsylvania easily anyway, even if the governor ran, the real governor, not the governor from Minnesota who's I mean, he's a sick puppy. That guy that poor guy feels sorry for him. But, they they made a bad choice with him. But if you pick Shapiro or anybody else, I spoke to him recently about his, you know, his house being set on fire, which was terrible. But if they picked him, would have won Pennsylvania. I won it by a lot. But I'm very disappointed because Elon knew the inner workings of this bill better than almost anybody sitting here, better than you people. He knew everything about it. He had no problem with it. All of a sudden, had a problem, and he only developed the problem when he found out that we're gonna have to cut the EV mandate because that's billions and billions of dollars, and it really is unfair. We wanna have cars of all types. Electric, we wanna have electric, but we wanna have a gasoline, combustion. We wanna have different. We wanna have hybrids. We wanna have all we wanna be able to sell everything. And when that was cut, and congress wanted to cut it, he became a little bit different, and I can understand that. But he knew every aspect of this bill. He knew it better than almost anybody.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

But Musk was ready and waiting. He weighed in on the president’s claim about Pennsylvania, and he took it one step further. Musk said: “Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate.” He added: “Such ingratitude”

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

And then Musk called out Trump’s claim that he knew the inner workings of the Big Beautiful Bill. “False, this bill was never shown to me even once and was passed in the dead of night so fast that almost no one in Congress could even read it!” https://t.co/G1HQKpoIbo

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Back in the Oval Office, the mood darkened again as Trump made a quiet prediction. “He hasn’t said bad about me personally,” he said. “But I’m sure that’ll be next.” There was no mistaking it now. This was a full-blown breakup. “I’m very disappointed in Elon. I’ve helped Elon a lot,” Trump said, his voice tightening. A reporter jumped in, asking the obvious: Had Musk brought any of these concerns to him in private before blasting them in public? Trump didn’t dodge. “No,” he said flatly. “He worked hard and he did a good job.” Then came a flash of emotional insight—a glimpse into how Trump sees these departures. “I think he misses the place,” he said. “ He got out there, and all of a sudden he wasn’t in this beautiful Oval Office.” “And he was,” Trump added. “And he’s got nice offices too. But there’s something about this one.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 expresses disappointment in Elon, stating, "I've helped Elon a lot." Speaker 1 asks if Elon raised concerns privately before making them public and questions whether Elon should be taken seriously about spending cuts, given his role in that area. Speaker 0 responds that Elon worked hard and did a good job, suggesting Elon misses his former position, noting the unique appeal of the Oval Office.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: He hasn't said bad about me personally, but I'm sure that'll be next. But I'm I'm very disappointed in Elon. I've helped Elon a lot. Speaker 1: Did he I just wanna clarify. Did he raise any of these concerns with you privately before he raised them publicly? And this is the guy you put in charge of cutting spending. Should people not take him seriously about spending now? Are you saying this is all sour grapes? Speaker 0: No. He worked hard and he did a good job. And I'll be honest, think he misses the place. I think he got out there and all of a sudden he wasn't in this beautiful Oval Office and he was and he's got nice offices too, but there's something about this

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

As the dust settled, Trump zoomed out. And what he said next felt like the conclusion to a pattern. “He’s not the first,” he said. “People leave my administration and they love us. And then at some point, they miss it so badly.” “Some of them embrace it. And some of them actually become hostile. I don’t know what it is.” Then, with a knowing smirk: “It’s sort of Trump Derangement Syndrome, I guess they call it.” It wasn’t just Musk anymore. Trump was describing a cycle—an emotional shift he believes happens to those who leave his orbit. “They leave and they wake up in the morning—and the glamor is gone. The whole world is different. And they become hostile. I don’t know what it is.” And then, he ended with: “Someday you’ll write a book about it and you’ll let us know.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
People leave my administration, and some miss it so badly that they either embrace it or become hostile. It's "Trump derangement syndrome," or they wake up and the glamour is gone, and the whole world is different, so they become hostile.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: He's not the first. People leave my administration and they love us. And then at some point, they miss it so badly. And some of them embrace it and some of them actually become hostile. I don't know what it is. It's sort of Trump derangement syndrome, I guess they call it. But I we have it with others too. They leave and they wake up in the morning and the glamour's gone. The whole world is different and they become hostile. I don't know what it is. Someday you'll write a book about it and you'll let us know. Yeah.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

But after the Oval Office meeting was finished, the real fireworks started. President Trump took to Truth social and launched an all-out assault on Musk: “Elon was “wearing thin,” I asked him to leave, I took away his EV Mandate that forced everyone to buy Electric Cars that nobody else wanted (that he knew for months I was going to do!), and he just went CRAZY!”

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Trump followed up with: “The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon’s Governmental Subsidies and Contracts. I was always surprised that Biden didn’t do it!” https://t.co/RiAIVhss0R

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

That’s when Elon Musk blew up the internet with this response: “Time to drop the really big bomb: @realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files. That’s the real reason they haven’t been made public. Have a nice day, DJT!” https://t.co/Kmrvc9RUKh

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@realDonaldTrump Elon added, “Mark this post for the future. The truth will come out.” https://t.co/fxAz5x4dl9

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

SUMMARY 1.) Trump confirmed the breakup and used the past tense to describe their relationship. • He said, “Elon and I had a great relationship. I don’t know if we will anymore,” signaling a clear end to their alliance. 2.) Trump accused Musk of being upset over losing billions in EV subsidies. • He claimed Musk’s criticism of the Big Beautiful Bill was financially motivated—not ideological. 3.) Musk immediately fired back on X and called Trump’s claims false. • He said he was never shown the bill, called Trump ungrateful, and defended the EV/solar incentives while blasting the “disgusting pork.” 4.) Trump revealed Musk tried to get Democrat Jared Isaacman nominated to lead NASA. 5.) Trump added he didn’t need Musk to win and would’ve taken Pennsylvania without him. • In response, Musk claimed that without his backing, Trump would have lost the election, and Democrats would control Congress. 6.) Trump took off the gloves and posted on Truth Social: • He said, “Elon was ‘wearing thin,’ I asked him to leave, I took away his EV Mandate that forced everyone to buy Electric Cars that nobody else wanted (that he knew for months I was going to do!), and he just went CRAZY!” 7.) That’s when Elon blew everything up. • He responded, “Time to drop the really big bomb: @realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files. That’s the real reason they haven’t been made public. Have a nice day, DJT!”

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@realDonaldTrump This story is still unfolding. I’m tracking every update in real time. Bookmark this post and come back to it later. Also, share it with a friend who needs a quick catch-up. There’s no reversing what’s been said. Stay tuned—this story is just beginning. https://t.co/Rc4FkLlrmY

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

The Trump/Musk breakup is now official. For the first time, Trump spoke out after Musk blasted the Big Beautiful Bill. But here’s the twist—Musk was watching live and firing back in real time on X. What happened next was painful to watch. Trump said, “Look, Elon and I had a great relationship. I don’t know if we will anymore.” Then Trump posted on Truth Social—and that’s when the gloves really came off. 🧵 THREAD

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

UPDATE #1: At 4:09 PM Eastern, Elon Musk writes: “In light of the President’s statement about cancellation of my government contracts, @SpaceX will begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft immediately.” This announcement followed President Trump’s earlier threat to terminate federal subsidies and contracts with Musk’s companies, including SpaceX and Tesla.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

UPDATE #2: Elon quote-tweets a post linking Trump to Jeffrey Epstein with a raised eyebrow emoji. The post claims Trump flew on Epstein’s plane at least 7 times, though there’s no proof he visited the island. It also highlights a 2002 New York Magazine quote where Trump described Epstein as “a terrific guy” who “likes beautiful women… on the younger side.” (See image for full quote)

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

UPDATE #3: Trump responds to Elon publicly attacking him, saying: “I don’t mind Elon turning against me, but he should have done so months ago. This is one of the Greatest Bills ever presented to Congress. It’s a Record Cut in Expenses—$1.6 Trillion Dollars—and the Biggest Tax Cut ever given. If this Bill doesn’t pass, there will be a 68% Tax Increase, and things far worse than that. I didn’t create this mess—I’m just here to FIX IT. This puts our Country on a Path of Greatness. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!”

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@realDonaldTrump @SpaceX UPDATE #4: At 4:43 PM Eastern, Elon Musk drops another raised eyebrow emoji—this time on a post by @chesschick01 that reads: “In 1992 Trump partied with Jeffrey Epstein. Just gonna leave this here:” https://t.co/q0Kac0xjts https://t.co/cAXjfl5kHr

Video Transcript AI Summary
Footage from a 1992 Mar-a-Lago party shows Trump interacting with Jeffrey Epstein. The party, filmed before Mar-a-Lago became a club, featured cheerleaders and captured Trump's bachelor lifestyle for Faith Daniels' NBC talk show. The video shows Trump surrounded by women, then greeting Epstein and two others. Trump is seen talking to Epstein while women dance nearby. Trump alternates between dancing and pointing out women to Epstein, also mentioning the cameras. Trump gestures to one woman, saying to Epstein, "look at her back there. She's hot." He then whispers something that makes Epstein laugh.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Of a Mar A Lago party shows Trump giving Epstein his personal attention. The footage shot in November of nineteen ninety two before Trump opened the resort as a club shows the future president surrounded by cheerleaders for the Buffalo Bills and Miami Dolphins, capturing Trump's fun loving bachelor lifestyle for an appearance on Faith Daniels' NBC talk show. We're gonna get great ratings in your show. Trump is surrounded by women as music blares in the background. After a while, Trump goes to greet three new guests. Among them, the financier Jeffrey Epstein. Come on in. Come inside. More than a decade before his guilty plea on state prostitution charges. Later in the footage, Trump is seen talking to Epstein and another man as women are dancing in front of them. Trump alternates between dancing and pointing out women to Epstein and the other man and telling Epstein about the cameras. Though exactly what they say is difficult to understand as they discuss the women and their appearances, Trump gestures to one and appears to say to Epstein, look at her back there. She's hot. And then Trump says something else into Epstein's ear that makes him double over with laughter. But as the president

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

🤨

@Chesschick01 - Natalie F Danelishen

In 1992 Trump partied with Jeffrey Epstein. Just gonna leave this here:

Video Transcript AI Summary
Footage from a 1992 Mar-a-Lago party shows Trump interacting with Jeffrey Epstein. The video, filmed before Mar-a-Lago became a club, features Trump surrounded by cheerleaders and was intended for Faith Daniels' NBC talk show. Trump greets Epstein and two others, then is seen talking to Epstein while women dance nearby. Trump alternates between dancing and pointing out women to Epstein, also mentioning the cameras. Trump gestures to one woman, saying to Epstein, "look at her back there. She's hot," and then whispers something that makes Epstein laugh.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Of a Mar A Lago party shows Trump giving Epstein his personal attention. The footage, shot in November of nineteen ninety two before Trump opened the resort as a club, shows the future president surrounded by cheerleaders for the Buffalo Bills and Miami Dolphins, capturing Trump's fun loving bachelor lifestyle for an appearance on Faith Daniels' NBC talk show. I'm gonna get great ratings on your surrounded by women as music blares in the background. After a while, Trump goes to greet three new guests. Among them, the financier Jeffrey Epstein. Come on in. Georgia. More than a decade before his guilty plea on state prostitution charges. Later in the footage, Trump is seen talking to Epstein and another man as women are dancing in front of him. Trump alternates between dancing and pointing out women to Epstein and the other man and telling Epstein about the cameras. Though exactly what they say is difficult to understand as they discuss the women and their appearances, Trump gestures to one and appears to say to Epstein, look at her back there. She's hot. And then Trump says something else into Epstein's ear that makes him double over with laughter. But as the president

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@realDonaldTrump @SpaceX @Chesschick01 UPDATE #5: Elon Musk replies “Yes” to a post by @stillgray that reads: “President vs Elon. Who wins? My money’s on Elon. Trump should be impeached and JD Vance should replace him.” https://t.co/YGyBsiGoSo

heydave7
Posted - July 6, 2025 at 10:59 PM
Saved - July 7, 2025 at 6:35 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A user expressed concern that someone close to the President should inform him that Elon Musk is more upset about the federal debt increase of $5 trillion than the electric vehicle mandate. Musk agreed, questioning the purpose of DOGE if the debt is rising. Another participant criticized Musk for supporting Trump, claiming he was used for political distraction and that Trump had no real interest in reducing the debt. Musk responded with disappointment, acknowledging the criticism.

@heydave7 - Dave Lee

Someone close to the President ought to tell him the truth. Elon isn’t mad about the EV mandate. He’s upset about $5 trillion being added to the federal debt in next 2 years. Of all the people close to him, I would expect VP Vance to understand this. He should make sure the President has his facts straight.

@SawyerMerritt - Sawyer Merritt

Trump has just posted about Elon Musk on Truth Social: https://t.co/EZ7hUNSwHr

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

@heydave7 💯

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

@heydave7 What the heck was the point of @DOGE if he’s just going to increase the debt by $5 trillion??

@alex_avoigt - Alex

Many told you that Trump will use you for his benefit and drop you right after but you didn't want to hear it. DOGE has been nothing else than an intended public distraction and you helped him very much to implement it successfully. Trump had never the slightest interest to reduce the US debt or reduce its increase but to eliminate political opponents and create the impression he is doing something while he worked on what matters to him which is the bill. I wish you would have listened to all the voices that tried to open your eyes but you've been blindely following him and achieved the opposite of what you stand for.

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

@alex_avoigt @heydave7 @DOGE 😞

View Full Interactive Feed