TruthArchive.ai - Related Post Feed

@nada88564211 — Transhumanism is the ultimate hate crime

Posted - February 1, 2023 at 7:41 PM

Saved - December 12, 2023 at 11:42 AM

@nada88564211 - Transhumanism is the ultimate hate crime

@PierreKory Pharma obscene-profit mechanism: Fund regulators/media. Utilise said channels to systematically and relentlessly demonise the cheap drugs - destroy the careers of credentialed physicians daring to prescribe same. Ceaselessly promote unjustifiably priced poisons. Ch-fckn-Ching!! https://t.co/Fb41Qy7v54

@rustyrockets — Russell Brand

Posted - October 18, 2023 at 2:19 PM

Saved - October 18, 2023 at 10:19 PM

@rustyrockets - Russell Brand

In the US 🇺🇸 "it's the highest expenditure on GDP healthcare, with the worst health outcomes" @DrAseemMalhotra on what happens when you allow big corporations to control information in health care. https://t.co/MEpZ00RYC9

Video Transcript AI Summary

In an interview with John Abramson, a Harvard lecturer and expert in drug litigation, he discusses how America's commercialization of medical knowledge has led to the highest healthcare expenditure with the worst health outcomes. The country has experienced a decline in life expectancy and an increase in chronic diseases. Abramson attributes this to drug companies prioritizing profit over providing the best treatment and controlling information about their drugs. He highlights that prescribed medications are the third leading cause of death globally. He also connects these issues to the neoliberal economic model promoted by figures like Ronald Reagan, Margaret Thatcher, and economist Milton Friedman, who believed that corporations should prioritize profits over people. This mindset helps explain the current state of healthcare. The COVID mRNA vaccine mandates have further exposed this issue.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Yesterday, I interviewed John Abramson, lecturer at Harvard. He's been involved in more drug litigation cases than probably any doctor on the planet. And he wrote a book called Sickening How Big Pharma Broke American Healthcare. And what he said to me was quite interesting. He said that America Keh has really shown it's it's it's been a natural experiment, at the extreme end is what what of what happens when you commercialize medical knowledge And look at what what's happened as he said already, it's a highest expenditure in wealthy countries, when it comes to GDP on healthcare with the worst health outcomes, they've They're losing years of their life expectancy, even pre pandemic. They've lost at least 2 years of their life expectancy by 2019. They've Got more people with chronic disease, you know, in, in any Western country. So the health is getting worse. And that really is a great example of what happens when you allow drug companies as you've alluded to already big corporations, whose only interest is profit, not to give the best treatment to control the information. And and and what that means exaggerating the safety and benefits of their drugs. And just For people to understand this, in a bit more depth, you know, one estimate from a very prestigious, eminent, scientist called Doctor. Peter Gersha, co founder of the Cochrane Collaboration. A few years ago, he said that the 3rd most common cause of death globally after heart disease and cancer is prescribed medications, what your doctor prescribes for you because of those very reasons. So I think those Absolutely at the heart of the problem. And I think that also comes back to, you know, this neoliberal economic model you mentioned. I think the roots of where the acceleration of these problems have, you know, have started actually is from this Neoliberal economic model that was promulgated by Ronald Rego and Margaret Thatcher. And Milton Friedman, as you know, Russell, the Nobel prize winning economist, who was a brainchild behind that. He in effect said that in the book, The Corporation written by law professor Joel Bakan. He said it is immoral. He said it is immoral for big corporations to put people before profits. Think about that for a second. If you've got that kind of culture and mindset within business, it helps explain why we are, where we are. And of course, we've even seen that come out with, you know, being exposed probably to the greatest level we we will ever see with the mandating of the COVID mRNA vaccines.

@Observ0123 — The Observer

Posted - November 9, 2023 at 5:23 PM

Saved - November 9, 2023 at 5:27 PM

@Observ0123 - The Observer

@markhollandlib "Create" the "Problem"...!! Then = "Invent" the so-called "CURE", = Poison... No Money in "Healthy" People... https://t.co/vfLD7Dr6gI

@Thekeksociety - DR. Kek

THE ROCKEFELLERS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DEATHS OF MILLIONS OF PEOPLE DUES TO THEIR WAR ON NATURAL REMEDIES! https://t.co/PbLz0FpdVs

Video Transcript AI Summary

John B. Rockefeller took control of U.S. medicine and redefined it when he realized drugs could be made from petroleum. He labeled traditional medicines as alternative and promoted addictive, patentable drugs as the new standard. Rockefeller acquired a German pharmaceutical company that produced chemicals for Hitler, and used his political influence to declare natural healing methods as quackery. He gained control of the American Medical Association and funded medical schools that taught only his approved curriculum, erasing any mention of herbal, plant, and dietary healing. Dissenters were punished, arrested, and silenced. Rockefeller also founded the American Cancer Society to suppress evidence linking petroleum-based medicines to cancer. Today, the pharmaceutical industry, influenced by Rockefeller's legacy, holds immense power over our lives.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Around the same time that John B. Rockefeller seized U. S. Media, he also hijacked U. S. Medicine. When it was discovered that drugs could be produced from petroleum, America's top oil mogul ordered his army of propagandists to invert reality accordingly. Medicines used for 1000 of years were suddenly classified as alternative, while the new, petroleum based, highly addictive and patentable drugs were declared the gold standard. After buying a German pharmaceutical company that manufactured chemicals of war for Adolf Hitler, Rockefeller leveraged his political influence by pressing Congress to declare natural healing modalities, I'm scientific quackery. Rockefeller then took control of the American Medical Association and began offering massive grants to top medical schools under the mandate that only his approved curriculum be taught. Any mention of the healing powers of herbs, plants and diet was erased from most medical textbooks. Doctors and professors those who objected to Rockefeller's plan were crucified by the media, removed from the AMA, and stripped of their license to teach and practice medicine. Those who dared to speak out were arrested and jailed. When evidence began to emerge that petroleum based medicines were causing cancer, mister Rockefeller founded the American Cancer Society through which he suppressed that information. John D. Rockefeller is duly credited as the founder of the pharmaceutical industry and the reason that medical error is currently the 3rd leading cause of death in America. This is not an indictment against doctors. More than anyone, they are under the stranglehold of the single largest lobbying power in Washington. Every year, the pharmaceutical industry spends at least twice the amount as Big O L to influence laws, policies and public perception. Thanks to Mr. Rockefeller, the architect of American monopolies, no industry has more power over our lives than Big Pharma.

@bambkb — Kevin - WE THE PEOPLE❤️ - DAD🦁 🐉 🔥

Posted - December 12, 2023 at 3:57 PM

Saved - December 13, 2023 at 12:21 AM

@bambkb - Kevin - WE THE PEOPLE❤️ - DAD🦁 🐉 🔥

🚨🚨🚨These diseases are all patented, which means they’re man-made🤷‍♂️ https://t.co/lSuZSQgWiq

@realdefender45 — Defender of the Republic 🇺🇸

Posted - December 27, 2023 at 6:53 AM

Saved - December 28, 2023 at 1:54 AM

@realdefender45 - Defender of the Republic 🇺🇸

Short version of how the Rockefeller’s hijacked modern medicine. https://t.co/yJAQ55b0Zv

Video Transcript AI Summary

In 1911, the Supreme Court found John D. Rockefeller in violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act and split his company, Standard Oil, into 34 independent entities. Despite this, Rockefeller remained unchanged and vowed to bankrupt America. Around the same time, petrochemicals were being developed into pharmaceuticals, posing a threat to Rockefeller's oil empire. To maintain control, he donated money to medical schools and hired Flexner to study their curriculum. This led to the establishment of allopathic medicine, which uses unnatural substances to treat diseases. Thus, Western medicine was founded.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: 18/72, Rockefeller bought up, shut down, or bankrupt 90% of the oil companies. Our good old constitution came into place, and in 1911, eleven, the Supreme Court found Rockefeller in violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act and split Standard Oil into 34 independent 11, so they said, you can't have the monopoly on this, you're done. You think that changed who he was? No. He promised to bankrupt America. At that very o same time, they were learning how to turn petrochemicals exactly what he had at his fingertips with oil into pharmaceuticals. Now John d Rockefeller's eleven biggest threat was natural health. So what does he do? Being the businessman he is, he donates money to the medical schools 11 because he wants to control. And what do you do when you wanna control someone? You give them money. And then he hired a guy by the name of Flexner to study the school's curriculum, eleven to figure out what they were teaching everybody and to persuade the government to establish allopathic medicine, which use the unnatural substances to treat diseases. O this is how Western medicine was founded.

@Cancelcloco — Ian Carroll

Posted - February 6, 2024 at 1:22 AM

Saved - February 6, 2024 at 7:39 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

The makers of Ozempic are lobbying for Medicaid funding, while conspiracy theorists argue against it. However, it is important to note that this conspiracy theory has been debunked, as big pharma aims to promote health and advocates for the greater good.

@Cancelcloco - Ian Carroll

The makers of Ozempic, the miracle weight loss drug(with obviously no side effects) are lobbying to get access to taxpayer Medicaid dollars. And conspiracy theorists claim this is all evidence of some conspiracy to make us sick and profit off of us? But that’s debunked. Big pharma is obviously hear to make us healthy and are lobbying the government for the greater good.

Video Transcript AI Summary

Novo Nordisk, the pharmaceutical company behind the weight loss drug Ozempic, is debunking conspiracy theories about profiting off people's health issues. They are lobbying the government to support the Treat and Reduce Obesity Act of 2023, which allows coverage for obesity treatment under Medicare. The company's stock has seen significant growth, and they have spent millions on lobbying and stock buybacks. While some board members have connections to other companies, Novo Nordisk aims to improve people's health. Critics argue that the drug has side effects and is expensive, but an article by Yoni Friedhoff, who received grants from Novo Nordisk, refutes these claims. Trusting the science and pharmaceutical companies is important for better health.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Know how conspiracy theorists are always saying that they want us fat and say that they can profit off of our demise? Well, today, we're gonna debunk that. Some good old fashioned fact checking. This is the stock chart for Novo Nordisk, the pharmaceutical company that makes Ozempic, the wonder drug for obesity. Their stock is up almost 400% in the last 5 years. So you might think, oh my gosh, they're just profiting off of our demise. But you would be wrong. They are lobbying the government off of our demise to the tune of $5,200,000 in 2022. Here's a chart of their lobbying over the years, and you see they're specifically lobbying over this bill, the treat and reduce obesity act of 2023, because they're trying to help out. The bill was introduced last fall, and it allows coverage under Medicare's prescription drug fit of drugs used for the treatment of obesity and weight loss like Ozempic. So you see what they're actually doing is they're trying to lobby for us to be able to use our gigantic Medicare budget to help the American people not be overweight and not have heart problems. And since according to the CDC, 74% of adult Americans are overweight or obese, they're They're doing an important service for the world, which is why the chair of the board of directors of Novo Nordisk is such a great guy. And you know he's a great guy because he is also the chair of the board of directors of BP PLC. Yes. That is British Petroleum. Other noteworthy heroes on the board of Novo Nordisk are Andreas, Who is the former president and chair of the board of Bear Healthcare? You know, this company, the one that owns Monsanto, The one that literally invented heroin? The one that was a significant portion of the German mega company IG Farben before World War 2? I don't think I'm allowed to talk about what IG Farben did during World War 2 on TikTok. And just real quick, one other outstanding citizen on the board of this company, Christina, she's on the board of 3 wonderful companies. Sorry. Formerly on the board of 3 wonderful companies. Namely, General Mills, Procter and Gamble, and Johnson and Johnson, all companies that are absolutely looking out for our health. And it makes a ton of sense that this company that's making all their money off of weight loss drugs would wanna have connections to all these other companies that are also trying to make Sure that our hormones are on point and our weight is on point. They're it's just a they're all working together to keep us healthy. And all this Silly, crazy conspiracy theorists online that say otherwise never even have any facts or evidence to present to their case. Like, for example, If you look up on Google, the problem with Ozepic, the top article is from Time Magazine, a highly reputable news source. And you can tell that this article is highly reputable because it's written by this guy, Yoni Friedhoff, Who actually received clinical grants from Novo Nordisk. So you know that he knows what he's talking about because he actually Received money from Novo Nordisk, so he knows the inside scoop really good. And he breaks down the top ten reasons why people that have problems Nodu and Nordisk are actually just blowing steam and are total conspiracy theorists that have no basis for their claims. Like, you have to take it forever and if you stop, you'll just gain all the weight back. Like, duh, that's how treatment for chronic conditions works, idiot. Like, of course, there are side effects. There's always side effects with Pharmaceutical drugs. They don't even treat the root causes, obviously, because no pharmaceutical drugs treat root causes. Like, what are you crazy? Like, they're expensive. Obviously, all pharmaceutical drugs are expensive. Like, no shit. That's why Novo Nordisk is suing the Biden administration to stop Medicare from negotiating lower drug prices because drugs are expensive, obviously. That's why Novo Nordisk charges US customers up to 8 times more for the exact same stuff that they're selling in other countries for less because drugs are expensive. Obviously, like, lifestyle alone is not sufficient to treat obesity. In fact, for most people, significant weight loss through lifestyle alone requires a huge amount of privilege. You know, the kind of privilege that it requires to eat Things like rice and chicken, kind of privilege it takes to sweat and exercise and endure pain and suffering in order to lose weight. That kind of privilege is not privilege that everyone can afford, you racist bigot. Sorry. I'm getting carried away. Shout out to Yoni For such a great article in time, I'm glad he's here. All these conspiracy theorists that are saying they're trying to use our tax Medicare dollars to fund themselves getting rich, They don't know what they're talking about because all these sales, all they do is make the company do well, and then the stock price goes up. And that isn't enriching the people like the executives at company. I mean, we already mentioned that they're spending a lot of it on making our government better at what it does, but they're also spending a lot of it on stock buybacks, which enriches everyone. You know, everyone that holds shares in the company, which is why per quarter in the past few 5 years, they've done an average of 786 $1,000,000 of stock buybacks. I actually pulled the data on all of their stock buybacks ever since this new drug Ozepic was invented in December of 2017, and they've done a total of $18,800,000,000 of stock buybacks because they're doing so well with this great drug It's making everyone better that they wanted to share the profits with everyone that holds stock in their company. And, I mean, sure. Maybe, like, the board members and executives might hold A little bit of stock in the company but, like, other people do too like big banks, obviously. So this is just another example of why conspiracy theorists have no fucking clue what they're talking about and you Shouldn't listen to them. And pharmaceutical companies are generally just doing what's best for everyone. They're trying to heal us. They're trying to make us healthier. They're trying to just improve the lives of normal people. And the next time that anyone questions a pharmaceutical company like Novo Nordisk, let's be honest. Just ignore them or tell them to trust the science because they obviously hate science. It's honestly so depressing how many people don't Trust the science these days. It just blows my mind. Like, one last point, why this company is so trustworthy is they actually are super in with the science. This guy that's on their board of directors, Well, he's also on the board of Bertelsmann. And Bertelsmann owns Penguin Random House, you know, the book publishing company. But they also own Bertelsmann Education Group along with a few other publishing companies. And Bertelsmann acquired this company called Relias, which is now called Relias Media. And Relias Media provides medical information, publications, and education to health care professionals. See, they're an accredited provider of continuing education through the American College of Emergency Physicians, American Academy of Pediatrics. All these really reputable organizations Shins trust, Relias Media to educate our health care professionals in fields like hospital management, cardiology, critical care, emergency medicine, infectious disease, etcetera. This is from their website and the the list goes on. This is just what fit in my screenshot. And remember their board member is also on the board of Novo Nordisk. And so you can just obviously, these guys are the Experts in health care and and in oil too, obviously. I mean, like, duh. So all you fucking idiots need to Stop questioning the science. There's literally nothing you can do about your weight except for trust the science and the pharmaceutical companies that are trying to help us all be healthier. So just Shut the fuck up, conspiracy theorists. Big pharma is here to help.

@catsscareme2021 — Jessica Rojas 🇺🇸💪

Posted - April 26, 2024 at 2:40 PM

Saved - April 26, 2024 at 6:50 PM

@catsscareme2021 - Jessica Rojas 🇺🇸💪

No money in healthy people. https://t.co/XZNnMpNBIu

Video Transcript AI Summary

Hurry to watch this video about the lost book of herbal remedies before it's removed. It contains valuable information on various remedies for common illnesses. The book provides clear pictures and instructions on identifying plants for treatment. The author emphasizes the cost-effectiveness of using organic herbs over expensive hospital bills. Get the book now before the price increases or it is removed from TikTok. Don't miss out on valuable knowledge for curing illnesses.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Jergump, you know exactly what's going on. That's why you guys gotta watch this video before he gets taken down or something happens to me. He says, and then people in black suit shows up and start asking very strange questions. Let me show you guys what we're talking about before it's too late. Look at this. This is the lost book of herbal remedies, and look at the gems and the gold it contains inside. Look at this. Look at this. They said it wasn't a cure for this. Look at this. Not just one option. So many options. So many remedies for it. And if that didn't grab you guys' attention, y'all know it has been an epidemic with this going around in the last few years, so it's better safe than sorry, guys. I'm a skinny guy. I'm definitely gonna have to check page 256. Look at this. I know you guys probably got friends and family members that suffers from this. They let you know the remedies for it and also the page number where to go to to identify the plant and get all the details. If you guys got older family members or friends that suffers from this, you have trouble quitting. Look at that. Wow. It teaches you how to identify each herb and plant. It gives you big bright pictures so you would not get confused. And honestly, guys, I'm not sure how long this book is gonna be on the TikTok shop for. You guys gotta get it while you can. I won't be surprised if this video gets taken out or this book is taken off the TikTok shop within the next few days. So this is Nicole, the author of the book. Nowadays hospital bills are 50, 100 of $1,000, Whereas, we could order a few organic herbs and possibly have the remedies for many, many it is at a discount. So before the price goes up or before the book gets taken out, grab it it while you can. Your future self will thank you. And I mean, what's the worst that's gonna happen? You just have so much knowledge on how to, cure certain illness. It's a win win for everybody.

@iluminatibot — illuminatibot

Posted - May 4, 2024 at 10:55 PM

Saved - May 5, 2024 at 2:53 PM

@iluminatibot - illuminatibot

Pharmaceutical companies don't want you to know about dandelion https://t.co/sWC8Yh4K72

Video Transcript AI Summary

I see weeds in the driveway as a medicine cabinet. Dandelion, plantain, sow thistle, wild violet, creeping Charlie, chicory, wintercress, burdock, longleaf plantain, yellow dock, and black eyed Susans are all edible and have medicinal properties. These plants offer pain relief, detox benefits, and are highly nutritious. They can help with digestion, wound healing, fever reduction, and even have anti-inflammatory and anti-cancer properties. The driveway is a treasure trove of health benefits waiting to be explored. Let me know your thoughts in the comments. Have a good day.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Do you see when you see weeds in the driveway? Let me show you what I see. If you look down a weedy driveway, I actually see an apothecary or a medicine cabinet. Take dandelion, for instance. It's edible, highly nutritious, and has a slew of medicinal properties. It's a great detox herb. Every single part of the plant is edible and usable. So all in all, that's probably one of the best additions to your yard. Right next to that, we have plantain. This is broadleaf plantain. If you remember the term plantain for pain, this is a pain relieving herb. It's edible. It could be eaten like spinach or raw in a in a salad. Highly nutritious, extremely good for your body. It's good for your digestion. It can help heal internal wounds, and, of course, it's a pain reliever. Just off the driveway, this is called sow thistle. This will have giant leaves or flowers just like a dandelion and those thorns when the when the plant is this small, those thorns aren't really very thorny. This plant is also super nutritious. It's a detox herb just like dandelion, and it shares many of the same properties. A little bit of wild violet. Wild violet is a medicinal plant. It's good for coughs. It's good for pain. It can be used internally or externally made into a tea or a capsule. This tank can also help break a fever. It's been used for 1000 of years medicinally, and it's actually a really good plant to have. A wild violet, we have another purple flower. There is creeping Charlie. Creeping Charlie, also called ground ivy, is actually a member of the mint family. It is safe enough for young children and infants, strong enough for a full grown man. It's really good for your digestion. It can be used for a wound healer. It can also help break a fever, and it's also highly nutritious. Close to our dandelion, we have chicory. Chicory is a great plant, very closely related dandelion, though it has a purple flower, not a yellow one. Every part of this plant is also edible, and the root contains a compound called inulin, which your body absorbs just like insulin. Chicory also has the unique ability to be able to break the barrier in your brain that tells your brain you want more when people have addictions. They've actually used it for for for some pretty strong addiction related illnesses. Further into the driveway, we have a plant that's called wintercress. Wintercress is popping up all over. It's one of the first edible plants that's available in the spring. The plant has a lot of medicinal properties. This is also a very good lung herb. It can help with pneumonia. It's antimicrobial. It's nutritious, and you can use it in any in many different ways. You can eat it raw. You can put it into a capsule, turn it into an extract. Whatever works for you. Some burdock that's back in the back of the driveway. This plant is also highly nutritious, the leaves are very nutritious and edible. The root is very healing, it's anti inflammatory. It's actually a main ingredient for a compound called Esiac, which is an anti cancer compound. Really healthy. Next to that, we have what's called longleaf plantain, narrowleaf plantain. It is exactly like the other plantain I showed you, plantain for pain. It can be eaten the same way. It has all the same nutrients. All in all, this is a pretty good plant too. And then we have yellow dock or curly dock, depends on what you wanna call it. If the leaves are more curly, it's curly dock, but a dock is a dock. You're a dock, you're a dock, you're a dock, you're a dock, you're a dock, dock. Yellow dock root has any inulin in it just like dandelion and chicory. It can be absorbed in your body just like insulin. It's anti inflammatory. They're highly nutritious. You could cook the roots just like you would your carrots. But not least are what's gonna be black eyed Susans. These plants get very invasive at times. They are the large yellow and black flowers. They're closely related to echinacea. They have the ability to increase your t cell production. They are an immunomodulator. Every plant of this every part of this plant is also edible and highly nutritious. So that's what I see when I walk down the driveway. Maybe later, let's take a walk in the yard and I'll show you the apothecary that's in the yard. What do you think? Let me know in the comments. A good day.

@myhiddenvalue — Not A Number

Posted - May 11, 2024 at 12:20 PM

Saved - May 11, 2024 at 7:11 PM

@myhiddenvalue - Not A Number

Big Pharma sell drugs that don't cure people https://t.co/jct0BK7x9l

Video Transcript AI Summary

There are 250,000 drugs in the PDR, but none are designed to cure anything except maybe antibiotics for strep throat. Pharmaceutical companies focus on making money from insurance policies rather than creating cures. Laws do not require them to produce drugs that cure, despite their ability to do so.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: 250,000 drugs, pharmaceuticals and PDR, the physician's desk reference, they have access to treat people in America. There's new ones coming out all the time. They're always bragging about how many 1,000,000,000 of dollars worth of research they spend every year to buy new drugs. If you take out the 500 antibiotics, that still leaves 249,005 100 drugs. Not a single one of those designed to cure anything. Not a single drug in the PDR except maybe antibiotics cure strep throat. Other than that, there's not a single drug in the PDR that cures anything. All designed to milk your insurance policies. They're all designed to milk Medicare and Medicaid, because there's no laws requiring pharmaceutical companies to manufacture drugs that cure, even though they could.

@myhiddenvalue — Not A Number

Posted - June 23, 2024 at 8:28 PM

Saved - June 23, 2024 at 11:15 PM

@myhiddenvalue - Not A Number

Big Pharma will not survive. https://t.co/MvFtrhUgAd

Video Transcript AI Summary

Kansas is suing Pfizer for deceptive marketing of its COVID-19 vaccine, violating previous agreements. Pfizer misled on safety for pregnant women, heart conditions, variant protection, and transmission. They censored criticism and avoided government oversight. Despite this, Pfizer delivered over 3.3 million doses in Kansas. This lawsuit is the first of a potential multistate effort.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Thank you for being here today. We, brought together this press conference to make the following announcement. And that is today, Kansas is filing a civil suit against the Pfizer Corporation under the Kansas Consumer Protection Act, seeking enhanced civil monetary penalties, damages, and injunctive relief for misleading and deceptive statements made in marketing its COVID 19 vaccine. Pfizer also violated, previous consent judgments with the state of Kansas in which Pfizer promised never to use deceptive information to market their products. Kansas's case is the first of a multistate collaboration with Kansas being the first of 5 states to file suit. Before I go further, let me put this in context. As we all know, during the COVID 19 pandemic, there was a great deal of panic and anxiety. Many people who were elderly or who suffered from various medical conditions had already died when the vaccines became available. And when that time came, when the vaccines became available, every one of us had to make 2 decisions. Am I going to take the vaccine? And if so, which vaccine will I choose to take? And these decisions were being made in a hurry. In some ways, you could say even being made under duress. In such an environment, it is imperative that Kansans making that decision receive the truth. They needed the truth. All Americans needed the truth. And in multiple respects, Pfizer did not provide the truth. Much of the information, in this lawsuit came out as a result of a FOIA lawsuit seeking information from Pfizer that still had not been made public. And it was only a result of that effort that some of the in information in this lawsuit, is available. I urge everyone to read the 69 page complaint, that goes into great detail about the specific statements that were made and the misleading nature of those statements made to Kansas consumers. The following is a quick summary of, I think, some of the foremost egregious examples of misleading the public in Kansas. Pfizer marketed its vaccine as safe for pregnant women. However, in February of 2021, Pfizer possessed reports for 458 pregnant women who received Pfizer's COVID 19 vaccine during pregnancy. More than half of the pregnant women reported an an adverse event and more than 10% reported a miscarriage, many within days of the vaccination. Pfizer also possessed information from its own October 2020 study on pregnancy in rats, indicating that its COVID 19 vaccine was likely linked to infertility, loss of litters, and stillborn offspring. Number 2, safety relating to heart conditions like myocarditis. Fire Pfizer consistently denied any evidence of a connection or safety signal between its COVID 19 vaccine and myocarditis or pericarditis. Indeed, on January 18, 2023, when asked whether its vaccine caused strokes or my myocarditis, Pfizer chairman and CEO, Alan Berla, stated, quote, we've not seen a single a single signal, although we have distributed billions of doses, end quote. A signal that he was referring to as a safety signal, which refers to a negative consequence. However, as Pfizer knew, the United States government, the United States military, foreign governments, and others had found that Pfizer's COVID 19 vaccine caused myocarditis and pericarditis. Number 3, effectiveness regarding variant variance. Pfizer also claimed that its COVID 19 vaccine protected against COVID 19 variants, even though data available at the time showed Pfizer's vaccine was effective less than half the time against variants. Finally, transmission. Pfizer urged Americans to get vaccinated in order to protect their loved ones, clearly indicating a claim that Pfizer's COVID 19 vaccination stopped transmission of COVID 19. Pfizer later admitted that it never even studied transmission of it after, its vaccines received the vaccine and and whether they could say it stopped transmission. After making these misleading statements, Pfizer also engaged, in some censorship attempts. Emails revealed that Pfizer officials coordinated with social media platforms to censor any speech critical of Pfizer's COVID 19 vaccine safety and effectiveness. It should also be noted that Pfizer elected not to join the federal government's vaccine development program known as Operation Warp Speed and declined that development funding. When asked about that, Pfizer's CEO Albert Bourla said Pfizer did not participate in the program in order to, quote, liberate, end quote, Pfizer's scientists and to avoid government oversight of its vaccine development. He also said, quote, they want reports. I don't want to have any of that, end quote. Referring to they when he said they, he's referring to the federal government. Pfizer's misleading statements contributed to success in marketing its vaccine in Kansas. By February of 2024, Pfizer had delivered over 3,300,000 doses of its vaccine in the state of Kansas. This is this accounted for over 60% of all vaccine doses given in the State of Kansas. The suit is being filed today. And as I mentioned before, it is part of a multistate effort in which more suits may follow depending on Pfizer's reaction.

@drsimonegold — Dr. Simone Gold

Posted - August 1, 2024 at 7:42 PM

Saved - August 2, 2024 at 2:36 PM

@drsimonegold - Dr. Simone Gold

This is what happens when Big Pharma installs their allies into positions of power. https://t.co/f2VaG36I7K

@ValerieAnne1970 — Valerie Anne Smith

Posted - August 31, 2024 at 8:32 PM

Saved - September 1, 2024 at 12:26 AM

@ValerieAnne1970 - Valerie Anne Smith

The Financial Model Of Big Pharma.....How To Make You Chronically Ill & Dependent On Drugs For The Rest Of Your Life. @maxlugavere & @DrNitric https://t.co/l1GBhhLtP6

Video Transcript AI Summary

To make someone chronically ill and dependent on drugs, one should have them eat the standard American diet, lower their cholesterol below 200, and give them proton pump inhibitors. This creates nutrient and vitamin D deficiencies due to lack of cholesterol, as well as testosterone and estrogen deficiencies. The result is a lifetime of illness requiring multiple drugs, as additional medications are needed to mitigate the side effects of the initial drugs, leading to polypharmacy. The FDA is supposed to protect us, but is influenced by big pharma, due to the large profits made from drug therapy.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: If I wanted to make you chronically ill and dependent upon drug therapy for the rest of your life, so you'd eat the standard American diet, I'd get your cholesterol below 200, and I would give you a proton pump inhibitor in acids. Mhmm. So now you become nutrient deficient, become vitamin d deficient because you don't have cholesterol, you become testosterone and estrogen deficient because you can't you don't have cholesterol to make these hormones. And there you go. Mhmm. You're you're you're ill for the rest of your life, and we're gonna have to put you on a drug, multiple drugs, by the way. Because once we put you on 1 or 2 drugs, we're gonna need 2 or 3 other drugs to mitigate the effects of those drugs, and you become a really good customer with long term value. Hello, polypharmacy. That's right. Yeah. It's a great financial model, obviously, but it's it's at the expense of our health and well-being. The FDA has an obligation and a responsibility to protect us. Yeah. That's why this organization, this agency was created. But, unfortunately, there's too much influence by big pharma. There's so much money to be made on drug therapy.

@itsmorganfr — morgan

Posted - September 5, 2024 at 6:48 PM

Saved - September 12, 2024 at 12:04 AM

@itsmorganfr - morgan

Why are there more toxic ingredients in American food than other countries? Because we pay the most for health care. Disease brings in profit. The health industry and the food industry are controlled by the same people. Do your research https://t.co/ekL6tsW91K

Video Transcript AI Summary

The US has twice as many toxic chemicals in the same products compared to other high-income countries. For example, US Quaker Oats, Mountain Dew, Heinz ketchup, and Doritos contain ingredients like high fructose corn syrup, yellow 5, brominated vegetable oil, and artificial colors, which are absent in their UK counterparts. The reason for this is that the same shareholders own the food and healthcare industries. Top shareholders of companies like Pepsi and Kellogg's also have major stakes in the healthcare industry. This creates a system where the population is poisoned through food, leading to increased healthcare needs and financial dependence, especially since the US spends the most on healthcare without universal coverage. These same entities also own major media outlets like Sony, Disney, CNN, Comcast, PBS, and Fox, enabling further manipulation of consumer behavior.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: If you don't yet understand why the United States has twice as many toxic chemicals in the same product as it does in other high income countries, stay tuned for this video because the answer is extremely simple and it makes a lot of sense. So just as a few examples, these are the Quaker Oats in the United States compared to the UK. Here is Mountain Dew in the United States compared to the UK. In the US, you see high fructose corn syrup, yellow 5, brominated vegetable oil, all kinds of crap compared to Mountain Dew in other countries. Heinz ketchup, same thing. High fructose corn syrup, corn syrup in the United States, no syrups whatsoever in the UK. Doritos, same thing. You get all these artificial colors. None of those are good for us. In the UK, you don't see any of that. And this is the last example that I'm gonna show in this video, but hopefully you get the idea that in the United States, in the same product, there are so many more toxic chemicals. But the thing is, the reason that there are so many more toxic chemicals in the same product in the United States as compared to other high income countries is because the same people that own all of those companies that own the food, that own the processed food, that own Kellogg's, that own Kraft, that own Procter and Gamble, that own Johnson and Johnson, they own Pepsi, they own Coke, they own the health industry. They own the health industry. So wouldn't they want to create more customers because we are paying high dollar? Let me show you. So I'm gonna briefly go through this because there's a lot of information to cover, and I could go down this rabbit hole forever and ever. But let me just show you the gist of it so you get an idea. So the first the first food that I showed you was McDonald's French fries that had more ingredients. These are the top 3 shareholders. Keep these in mind. Remember these. The second food I showed you was Quaker Oats. They're owned by Pepsi. And when you look up Pepsi's top shareholders Oh, that's a little familiar, isn't it? I then showed you Mountain Dew and Doritos. Mountain Dew and Doritos are both owned by Pepsi, which are owned by these people. And the last one that I showed you was Frosted Flakes. Frosted Flakes is owned by Kellogg's. And then you see these 3 shareholders and their top shareholders again. So now that I've showed you who owns the majority of our food, let me show you who owns the health care industry because I don't know that anybody will be entirely shocked. This makes so much sense, and hopefully people start to catch on because it is the it is why America is the way it is. So now that we know that the same people that own the health care industry own our food, Doesn't it make sense why they would poison and target the people that pay the most for health care? Because here in America, we are the only high income country that doesn't have universal health care, and we pay the most for health care by a lot. Let me show you. Our health care spending is actually a world outlier. That's how much we spend on health care. So how evil genius of them to poison the food that we consume, to make us sick so that we come to the health care industry and become physically and financially dependent. You trying to sell a pen, make the customer need a pen. You trying to sell a medication, make the customer sick and need that medication. But do yourself a favor and look into what I'm talking about further because it goes so deep, so much deeper than what I'm even explaining in this 5 minute video. Because those same people that own the healthcare industry and the same people that own our food, they also own everything that we visually and auditorily consume too. They own Sony, they own Disney, they own CNN, they own Comcast, they own PBS, they own Fox, they own everything that we consume so that they can mentally manipulate us to consume their products even further. And they got us right where they want us.

@myhiddenvalue — Not A Number

Posted - October 24, 2024 at 9:00 AM

Saved - October 25, 2024 at 8:23 AM

@myhiddenvalue - Not A Number

Doctors have limited knowledge, and it's by design to profit the drug industry. https://t.co/7lgVsoL2Uv

Video Transcript AI Summary

Medical doctors are trained in allopathic reductionism, which focuses solely on drugs and surgery. While these interventions have their place, MDs receive training limited to this area. The pharmaceutical industry influences medical education and research in the United States, prioritizing pharmaceutical research over other areas like homeopathic or botanical medicines, acupuncture, or medical nutrition. The focus is on developing new drugs or gene splices. Just as one wouldn't seek advice from a Republican about social programs or a Democrat about military funding, medical doctors are not trained in medical science, but rather in allopathic reductionism, which exclusively values drugs and surgery.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Medical doctors are trained in allopathic reductionism and allopathic reductionism has no time, no concern, no appreciation for anything other than drugs or surgery. This is very important thing to understand, right. Medicine is like a big pizza and there are different slices of the pizza. The slice of the pie of medicine that the MDs are trained in has no time, no respect, no appreciation and no concern for anything other than drugs and surgery. And there's nothing wrong with drugs and surgery when they're used appropriately. Again, right? Thank God for Novocaine and morphine and the sterile technique in Penicillin. But MDs are not taught anything other than their piece of the pie because the pharmaceutical industry has leverage over what the MDs are taught. Also the pharmaceutical industry has leverage over what type of research is done at universities in the United States. It's not medical research that's done. It's pharmaceutical research. Is any research being done about homeopathic medicines or botanical medicines or the use of acupuncture or the use of medical nutrition? No. None of that's being done. It's all about inventing a new drug or a new gene splice or something else. It's all filling in the piece of the pie of science that the MDs are trained in. It's kind of like, you wouldn't expect a Republican in the United States to give you advice about a social program, nor would you expect a Democrat to give you advice about war funding, military funding, because it's not really their thing. Right? You wouldn't expect a Buddhist to tell you about, Judaism, and you wouldn't expect a Roman Catholic to tell you about reincarnation because it's just not their thing. Well, medical doctors are not trained in medical science. Nobody is. Medical doctors are trained in allopathic reductionism and allopathic reductionism has no time, no concern, no appreciation for anything other than drugs or surgery. That's the short answer.

@iluminatibot — illuminatibot

Posted - October 27, 2024 at 10:46 AM

Saved - October 28, 2024 at 4:30 AM

@iluminatibot - illuminatibot

Pharmaceutical companies can't profit from dandelion!!! https://t.co/1S4iDMKD7q

@myhiddenvalue — Not A Number

Posted - October 28, 2024 at 3:17 AM

Saved - October 28, 2024 at 10:35 AM

@myhiddenvalue - Not A Number

They're adding cancer causing ingredients to the Food Supply, so they can make money from chemo later. https://t.co/8Flv3y6Eat

Video Transcript AI Summary

In the US, Skittles contain 11 ingredients, including harmful substances like dimethylpolysiloxane and artificial dyes, while the UK version has only 3 ingredients and optional salt. The US version includes 10 artificial dyes and titanium dioxide, banned in Europe for its potential DNA damage and links to cancer. Gatorade in the US uses red 40 and caramel color, whereas Germany opts for natural colors from carrots and sweet potatoes. Doritos in the US contain multiple artificial dyes and MSG, while the UK version does not. General Mills recently launched a dye-free version of Trix in Australia, highlighting the disparity in food safety standards. This motivates the push for equal treatment of American consumers by food companies.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: In the US, there's 11 ingredients. In the UK, there's 3. And salt is optional. An ingredient called dimethylpolysiloxane is an ingredient preserved with formaldehyde, a neurotoxin. This is Skittles. Notice the long list of ingredient differences. 10 artificial dyes in the US version and titanium dioxide. This ingredient is banned in Europe because it can cause DNA damage. Artificial dyes are made from petroleum, and products containing these dyes require a warning label in Europe. And they have been linked to cancer and disruptions in the immune system. This on the screen back here is Gatorade. In the US, they use red 40 and caramel color. In Germany, they don't. They use carrot and sweet potatoes to color their Gatorade. This is Doritos. The US version has 3 different artificial dyes and MSG. The UK version does not. General Mills is definitely playing some tricks on us. They launched a new version of Trix just recently in Australia. It has no dyes. They even advertised that when the US version still does. This is why I became a food activist. My name is Vonnie Hari, and I only want one thing. I want Americans to be treated the same way as citizens in other countries by our own American companies.

@goddeketal — Dr. Simon Goddek

Posted - February 14, 2025 at 6:35 PM

Saved - February 15, 2025 at 9:37 AM

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

1/ Ever wonder why doctors know almost NOTHING about nutrition, herbs, the importance of sunshine, or holistic healing? Because one man, John D. Rockefeller, decided that only patented, oil-based drugs should exist. And he made it happen. Here’s how: 🧵👇 https://t.co/ZoAwsG4009

@TheFlatEartherr — FLAT OUT TRUTH

Posted - April 6, 2025 at 1:37 PM

Saved - April 7, 2025 at 8:55 PM

@TheFlatEartherr - FLAT OUT TRUTH

John. D Rockefeller invents Big Pharma, this is why you are always feeling sick! https://t.co/5F7sY8RcDt

Video Transcript AI Summary

John D. Rockefeller is credited with founding the pharmaceutical industry by inverting reality through propaganda after discovering drugs could be produced from petroleum. Medicines used for thousands of years were classified as alternative, while petroleum-based drugs were declared the gold standard. After buying a German pharmaceutical company, Rockefeller pressured Congress to declare natural healing modalities unscientific. He took control of the American Medical Association, offering grants to medical schools mandating his approved curriculum. Mentions of the healing powers of herbs, plants, and diet were erased from textbooks. Objecting doctors were removed from the AMA and stripped of their licenses. Rockefeller founded the American Cancer Society, suppressing information that petroleum-based medicines were causing cancer. Medical error is now the third leading cause of death in America. The pharmaceutical industry spends twice as much as Dave O'Hell to influence laws, policies, and public perception.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: When it was discovered that drugs could be produced from petroleum, America's top oil mogul ordered his army of propagandists to invert reality accordingly. Medicines used for thousands of years were suddenly classified as alternative, while the new petroleum based, highly addictive, and patentable drugs were declared the gold standard. After buying a German pharmaceutical company that manufactured chemicals of war for Adolf Hitler, Rockefeller leveraged his political influence by pressing Congress to declare natural healing modalities unscientific quackery. Rockefeller then took control of the American Medical Association and began offering massive grants to top medical schools under the mandate that only his approved curriculum be taught. There I go for math in the sixth. Any mention of the healing powers of herbs, plants, and diet was erased from most medical textbooks. Doctors and professors who objected to Rockefeller's plan were crucified by the media, removed from the AMA, and stripped of their license to teach and practice medicine. Those who dared to speak out were arrested and jailed. When evidence began to emerge that petroleum based medicines were causing cancer, Mr. Rockefeller founded the American Cancer Society, through which he suppressed that information. John D. Rockefeller is duly credited as the founder of the pharmaceutical industry, and the reason that medical error is currently the third leading cause of death in America. This is not an indictment against doctors. More than anyone, they are under the stranglehold of the single largest lobbying power in Washington. Every year, the pharmaceutical industry spends at least twice the amount as Dave O'Hell to influence laws, policies, and public perception. Thanks to mister Rockefeller, the architect of American monopolies. No industry has more power over our lives than big pharma.

@TheWarEnglish — Warren English

Posted - April 10, 2025 at 12:12 PM

Saved - April 10, 2025 at 9:07 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

I left my pharmacy career after realizing the dark truths about America's healthcare system. It's not about health; it's about profit, with a focus on treating symptoms rather than root causes. Big Pharma influences everything, and doctors are overworked by insurance constraints. Prevention is ignored, and our food is filled with harmful ingredients. We're overmedicated and undernourished, especially in mental health care. Real healing is often silenced. To achieve true health, I advocate for lifestyle changes and taking control of our well-being.

@TheWarEnglish - Warren English

This dark truth made me quit my pharmacy career... America spends more on healthcare than any country in the world. Yet we're the sickest, most overmedicated population in history. Here's exactly what's wrong with America's Healthcare System (& how they maximize profit): https://t.co/2IDJWUUuxT

@TheWarEnglish - Warren English

1. It's Not Healthcare. It's Sickcare. The system doesn't care to keep you healthy. Why? It profits when you're sick. Doctors are trained to: • Prescribe pills • Treat symptoms • Perform procedures Not to address root causes, optimize nutrition, or prevent disease. https://t.co/9qdOenVxVf

Video Transcript AI Summary

Hospitals need to make money and grow economically. A problem arises if patients heal without pills or surgery because the hospital and doctor are in trouble. If you help people heal in a way that isn't billable, you've worked yourself out of a job.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: The hospital needs to make money. They need to make money. They need to they need to grow economically. They need to grow economically. And the problem there is that if you figure out a way to help patients heal, and that in that way doesn't include a pill or a surgery, well, then the hospital and the doctor are in big trouble because if you figure out a way to help people heal and you can't charge them for it, well then you've just worked yourself out of a job.

@TheWarEnglish - Warren English

2. Big Pharma Runs the Show The pharmaceutical industry: • Spends billions lobbying Congress • Influences FDA decisions • Funds medical schools They don't want cures. They want customers. Repeat patients = recurring revenue. I saw this firsthand working in Pharmacy. https://t.co/FwwzJ6iXLF

@TheWarEnglish - Warren English

3. Doctors Are Overworked & Underpaid by Insurance The average doctor visit is 13 minutes. Why? Because insurance companies dictate: • What treatments they can offer • How long they spend with you • Which tests are "covered" It's quantity > quality… Not care. https://t.co/Rgvb2wTEXL

Video Transcript AI Summary

As a physician, the speaker expresses frustration with traditional health insurance where patients are billed for each visit, and doctors profit from patient illness. Direct primary care offers an alternative: patients pay a monthly subscription, potentially as low as $70, for unlimited access to the physician. With direct primary care, patients don't pay per visit, and the doctor doesn't profit from increased patient visits. The speaker believes this model saves doctors time by eliminating billing and insurance issues. Patients should seek out direct primary care physicians for a better healthcare experience. The speaker advocates for physicians and patients to collaborate in removing healthcare from the health insurance system to ensure affordable, high-quality care for everyone.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: You're upset with health insurance? Well, I'm a physician and I'm just as upset as you are. In my previous career at a non profit healthcare institution, every time I would see a patient, they would get a bill. And if they came to see me more often because they were sick or injured, they would get more and more bills. The difficult thing is I would also get paid more the more times patients came to see me. So the patient was having to pay and I was profiting off of their illness. Direct primary care does not work this way. In direct primary care, patients pay a monthly subscription to be a part of my practice and it can be as low as $70 and they have unlimited access to me as a physician for anything that they need. There are no bills for coming to see me. If you need something, I am there. I don't get paid more the sicker you are, and you don't have to pay more if you need to see me and have access to more health care. More doctors need to look into providing health care in this way because it saves you as a physician so much time thinking about billing or dealing with insurance agencies. And for patients, you should all look out for direct primary care physician. Your experience will be nothing like you've ever had in traditional healthcare. So I think we all need to work together as both physicians and patients to remove healthcare from the health insurance complex and to start working together to access high quality and affordable healthcare for all.

@TheWarEnglish - Warren English

4. Prevention Is Ignored 80% of chronic diseases are preventable with: • Diet • Sleep • Movement • Stress management But those aren't billable. So prevention gets ignored. The greatest lesson I learned from pharmacy school. https://t.co/kg3Mmuyy1r

@TheWarEnglish - Warren English

5. The Food Industry & Healthcare Work Together The same companies that make ultra-processed food… Also fund healthcare institutions. They create the disease, then profit off the "cure." This isn't a healthcare system. It's a disease management business. https://t.co/pI0J5qYvsm

@TheWarEnglish - Warren English

6. Our Food Is Full of Toxins In the US, we allow ingredients that are banned in 30+ countries: • Seed oils • Artificial dyes • Hormone-disrupting preservatives These drive obesity, cancer & infertility. & the FDA approves it. The exact ingredients fueling our health crisis.

Video Transcript AI Summary

America's food is banned in 30 countries and is allegedly killing people. Lay's potato chips, for example, have different ingredients in America versus Europe. Over 10,000 food chemicals are allowed in the American food system that are not allowed in other countries. This makes it easier for food companies and gives products longer shelf life due to the chemicals. When people lobby for healthier food choices, the food industry lobbies against it with millions of dollars.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: America's food is banned in 30 countries. The food is killing people. Oh, yeah. It's definitely killing people. If somebody were to buy a bag of Lay's potato chips versus buying it in Europe and look at the ingredients, they're totally different. They will make the healthier version for another country. There's over 10,000 food chemicals that are allowed in the American population or food system that aren't allowed in other countries. It makes it easier for food companies, gives them longer shelf life because they're putting so many chemicals in. So anytime we lobby for healthier food choices in our school systems, in our neighborhoods, the food industry is going right behind them with billions and millions of dollars saying, no. We can't do that.

@TheWarEnglish - Warren English

7. We're Overmedicated & Undernourished Over 66% of Americans take at least one prescription drug. Yet: • 1 in 2 are vitamin D deficient • Nutrient testing is rarely done • Most lack magnesium, omega-3s, zinc We're not deficient in pharmaceuticals… We're deficient in real health.

@TheWarEnglish - Warren English

8. Mental Health Is a Pill Mill Anxiety? Depression? ADHD? Here's a prescription. No mention of: • Trauma • Nutrition • Gut health • Lifestyle habits Real mental health requires healing. Not just numbing symptoms. Drugs help you survive, not thrive. https://t.co/lSgFAq4k48

@TheWarEnglish - Warren English

9. Real Healers Get Silenced • Holistic doctors • Functional medicine • Nutrition-focused practitioners They're often: • Mocked by media • Shadowbanned online • Attacked by medical boards Because they threaten the profits they make off of us.

@TheWarEnglish - Warren English

10. What You Can Do Instead You don't need to be dependent on a broken system. You can: • Learn how to cook real, whole foods • Get sunlight & fresh air every day • Prioritize 7-8 hrs of deep sleep • Take control of your stress • Walk 8,000+ steps daily • Lift weights 2-3x weekly This is how you actually get AND stay healthy.

@TheWarEnglish - Warren English

With all this being said... RFK becoming the new secretary of health is a huge step for America. Finally having someone who cares about the health of Americans more than the profit. With him going against big pharma... I'm optimistic about the future of American healthcare. https://t.co/dhP8870P0f

Video Transcript AI Summary

Americans are dying earlier than people in comparable countries, and chronic diseases are on the rise. A big part of the problem is the U.S. diet, where the government approves poisons in food that end up in every supermarket aisle. For example, the harmful yellow dye tartrazine (Yellow Dye #5), originally made from coal tar, is found in many foods, including those considered healthy, like popcorn, mac and cheese, and even vitamins. Tartrazine is linked to tumors, asthma, developmental delays, neurological damage, ADD/ADHD, hormone disruption, gene damage, anxiety, depression, and intestinal injuries. Other countries restrict or require warning labels for tartrazine. Tartrazine is just one of at least a hundred chemical poisons allowed in children's food. The combined effects of these chemicals have never been studied. Removing these chemicals could lead to immediate health improvements. The government has banned eight chemical additives that cause similar conditions, all under President Trump. The speaker claims that Democrats have allowed these poisons to remain in food, benefiting big food, big ag, and big pharma. The speaker and President Trump plan to stop the mass poisoning of American children and make America healthy again.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: This is what most Americans innocently put into their bodies these days and most alarmingly into the bodies of their children. And it's no coincidence that Americans die earlier than Canadians or Germans or Italians or Japanese or Koreans or Australians or most any other comparable country. And it wasn't always that way until the early nineteen nineties. Our life expectancy was the same or better than other developed countries. Then suddenly, more and more Americans began suffering from chronic diseases, from obesity, cancer, diabetes, kidney disease, Alzheimer's, heart disease, and all kinds of autoimmune diseases, our maternal mortality rate soared to the highest of any developed country on earth. Same with infant mortality. Like the frog in the slowly boiling water, we didn't really notice as we got sicker and sicker. We 've grown now to accept chronic disease conditions as normal. But now in 2024, we're finally waking up to this cataclysm, and we're asking ourselves, how in the world did this happen? A big part of it is our diet. Restaurants that serve contaminated food are fined or shut down. But when it's the government that approves the poisons in our food, a few people get very, very rich, and the toxins end up in every supermarket aisle. Let me show you what I mean. Doritos, Cheez Its, Captain Crunch, gummy bears. Everyone knows that these are junk foods, so maybe you wouldn't be too surprised to see that the ingredients include a lot of poisons, including a harmful yellow dye called tetrazine or yellow dye number five. What you may not know is that this dye was originally made out of the sludge that's left over when you turn coal into coke for blast furnaces. It's called coal tar, and I've actually sued many big industries for legacy contamination of coal tar all around the country because it's so toxic and it's so harmful to the environment and human beings. A century ago, it was just an obnoxious industrial byproduct that everybody was trying to figure out ways to get rid of. One of the ways that they did that was by paving roads. But then a British chemist figured out that the coal tar could be used to derive fabric dye. And if fabric dye, why not food? Food manufacturers began using it to cover up the discoloration of low quality foods that they wanted to pass off on unsuspecting customers. They didn't know back then that this yellow dye, tartrazine, causes tumors, asthma, developmental delays, neurological damage, ADD, ADHD, hormone disruption, gene damage, anxiety, depression, intestinal injuries. Well, we know it now. We've known this for decades. That's why tartrazine is heavily restricted in other countries. In some countries, foods with tartrazine have a warning label that it may cause ADHD in children. Today, it's made from petroleum, not coal tar. Either way, it's crazy to add this to your kid's favorite foods. It doesn't even change the flavor. This yellow dye isn't just a junk food. It's in the foods that we consider healthy. It's in everyday kids snacks like popcorn, mac and cheese, fruit snacks. It's in sports drinks like Gatorade and so called vitamin water. It's even added to chicken broth, to corn, to pickles, to mustard, and to yogurt. And so, of course, our kids get sick, and we lovingly feed them chewable vitamins which have surprise tartrazine. And so the cycle continues until the coughs and asthma kick in, at which point you go to pick up some cough syrup. And, yeah, you guessed it, tartrazine. I've been picking on tartrazine today, but that's just one of at least a hundred chemical poisons that our health agencies allow into our children's food. I can make video just like this to talk about red 40, BHA, BHT, potassium bromate, chemical after chemical, and on and on and on. If just one of them can cause all of these problems, imagine what they're doing in combination. That has never been studied. If we took all of these chemicals out, our nation would get healthier immediately. We'd have fewer sick days. We'd have better focus. We'd have less anxiety. Our kids would learn more easily. We'd lose weight. We'd have more energy. We'd have fewer tumors and longer lives. It's not all dark. Over the past sixteen years, the government has banned eight chemical additives that cause cancer, genetic damage, asthma, and many of the other self conditions as tardigine does. And you know what's interesting? All eight of those crucial steps forward in our kids' health were taken under president Trump. But the Democrats who claim to be all about health care have stood by watching other countries ban these poisons and make our kids sick, asthmatic, hyperactive, and depressed. They left them on every supermarket shelf in America. They even used your tax money to put them in your kid's school lunch. So their big food and their big ag donors probably gave them all that golden handshake and the big money hug, and their big pharma donors probably called them up and thanked them also because now they're gonna make billions selling Adderall, Prozac, and rescue inhalers. Enough is enough. President Trump and I are gonna stop the mass poisoning of American children. Together, we're gonna make America healthy again.

@TheWarEnglish - Warren English

The Bottom Line: The U.S. healthcare system is built to: • Keep you sick • Maximize profits • Keep you dependent If you want real health, you have to take your power back. They won't save you. You have to save yourself.

@TheWarEnglish - Warren English

Have any questions? Let me know below. & If you enjoyed this thread… Follow me @TheWarEnglish for more content like this.

@WallStreetApes — Wall Street Apes

Posted - June 28, 2025 at 11:22 AM

Saved - July 1, 2025 at 5:16 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

I came across a shocking revelation from an American pharmacist about the healthcare system. Certain effective drugs, like Brenzavvy, are being sidelined because they are too cheap. Insurance companies refuse to cover them, leading doctors to avoid prescribing them and wholesalers to not carry them. This is all to protect the profits of pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs), who earn substantial rebates from more expensive medications. The system prioritizes profit over patient care, effectively banning affordable options and perpetuating high drug costs. It feels like organized crime to me.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

WOAH 🚨 Pay attention to this American pharmacist exposing that some cheap, very effective drugs, HAVE BEEN BANNED form being prescribed because they’re too cheap So instead of the cheap option, drugs that cost $1,000+ are allowed for certain treatments (INSANE) “The most insane examples of why drugs cost so much is a drug called Brenzavvy. You almost certainly haven't heard of it, but you've probably heard of similar drugs like Jardiance or Farxiga. The reason you haven't heard of Brenzavvy, though, is because no insurance companies will cover it. Most doctors won't prescribe it, and most wholesalers won't even carry it. When I tell you why our entire healthcare industry is turning its back on this proven drug in one of the most critical classes in existence, you are going to be furious. They are shunning Brenzavvy because it's too cheap. I'm not being hyperbolic or sensational. I mean it literally. At my pharmacy, Brenzavvy costs $60 bucks. When they took that price to the pharmacy benefits managers, or PBMs, that's the people in charge of deciding what's covered on your insurance, they all said no, because Brenzavvy can't do a rebate at a price that low. Farxiga and Jardiance, the other Drugs in the SLGT 2 class with Brenzavvy, cost insurance payers $1000 bucks each prescription up front. Then they get a big, probably like 40% rebate later. So that's a $400 rebate, and that is a huge selling point for the PBMs to prove how important they are. The PBMs get a piece of that rebate, and they get a percentage of the final price. An HHS report from last year said that the PBMs get 23% on average for for brand meds. After the rebate, Farxiga and Jardiance still cost $600. 23% of that is $138 for the middleman. Those drugs get dispensed 8 million times a year, which means the total they make in a year off of those two drugs is $1.1 billion. They don't make the drug, they don't prescribe it, they don't dispense it, they don't sell it. They only have to do one thing to make that money. Keep Brenzavvy off their list. If they let in a drug that costs 1/10 of the price and doesn't pay rebate, they literally lose a billion dollars a year. To me, that's the clearest example of why we will never get affordable health care in America. As long as we have PBMs involved, they can't afford to save you money.“ So while this might not be an outright ban, meaning illegal to create, for all purposes it is a ban. Because if the insurance companies won’t cover it, their doctors won’t prescribe it and nearly all wholesalers won’t carry it, that means the insurances companies and PBMs are effectively banning medication in America so they can make maximum profits. Billions a year on a single Medicine, when there are much cheaper options available for the customer This is organized crime. This is racketeering

Video Transcript AI Summary

Brenzavvy, a drug similar to Jardiance or Farxiga, is not covered by insurance, prescribed by doctors, or carried by wholesalers because it is too cheap. Brenzavvy costs $60 at the speaker's pharmacy. Pharmacy benefits managers (PBMs) deny coverage because Brenzavvy's low price prevents rebates. Farxiga and Jardiance cost insurance payers $1,000 upfront with a 40% rebate. An HHS report stated PBMs get 23% on average for brand meds. After rebates, Farxiga and Jardiance still cost $600, with PBMs earning $138. With 8,000,000 prescriptions a year, PBMs make $1,100,000,000 off those two drugs. The speaker claims PBMs keep Brenzavvy off their lists to avoid losing a billion dollars annually. The speaker believes affordable healthcare is impossible with PBMs involved. The speaker encourages listeners to use forestpark.pharmacy to save money and to inform their bosses about potential savings.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: One of the most insane examples of why drugs cost so much is a drug called Brenzavvy. You almost certainly haven't heard of it, but you've probably heard of similar drugs like Jardiance or Farxiga. The reason you haven't heard of Brenzavvy though is because no insurance companies will cover it. Most doctors won't prescribe it and most wholesalers won't even carry it. When I tell you why our entire healthcare industry is turning its back on this proven drug in one of the most critical classes in existence, you are going to be furious. They are shunning Brenzavvy because it's too cheap. I'm not being hyperbolic or sensational. I mean it literally. At my pharmacy, Brenzavvy costs $60. When they took that price to the pharmacy benefits managers or PBMs, that's the people in charge of deciding what's covered on your insurance, they all said no because Brinzavvy can't do a rebate at a price that low. Farxiga and Jardiance, the other drugs in the SLGT two class with Brinzavvy cost insurance payers a thousand bucks each prescription upfront, then they get a big, probably like 40% rebate later. So that's a $400 rebate and that is a huge selling point for the PBMs to prove how important they are. But the PBMs get a piece of that rebate and they get a percentage of the final price. An HHS report from last year said that the PBMs get 23% on average for brand meds. After the rebate, Farxiga and Jardiance still cost $600. 23% of that is a $138 for the middleman. Those drugs get dispensed 8,000,000 times a year, which means the total they make in a year off of those two drugs is $1,100,000,000. They don't make the drug. They don't prescribe it. They don't dispense it. They don't sell it. They only have to do one thing to make that money. Keep Brenzavvy off their list. If they let in a drug that costs a tenth of the price and doesn't pay rebate, they literally lose a billion dollars a year. To me, that's the clearest example of why we will never get affordable health care in America as long as we have PBMs involved. They can't afford to save you money. That's why we fired the middleman. Go to forestpark.pharmacy to look at a price checker and transfer today to save. Then click the tell my boss button so I can explain how they're getting ripped off and how I can save them and you money. See you.

@newstart_2024 — Camus

Posted - August 6, 2025 at 9:03 PM

Saved - August 6, 2025 at 10:59 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

I shared the story of Dr. Zach Bush, who uncovered a vitamin A compound in 2008 that effectively destroyed cancer cells in the lab. Despite the promising results, when he sought to bring this breakthrough to patients, he learned it could take 25 years, if it ever happened. A pharmaceutical company had patented the compound not to develop it, but to prevent others from doing so. His mentor revealed that the patent served as a barrier, prioritizing profit over patient lives. This raises troubling questions about how many potential treatments remain hidden due to similar motives.

@newstart_2024 - Camus

How a Potential Cancer Cure Was Deliberately Blocked Dr. Zach Bush's story reveals the dark truth about how medical breakthroughs are often suppressed—not advanced. In 2008, he discovered a vitamin A compound that destroyed cancer cells in the lab. The results were undeniable. The implications? Life-saving. But when he asked, "How do we get this to patients?" the answer was crushing: "25 years—if ever." Why? A pharmaceutical company had already patented vitamin A derivatives not to develop a treatment, but to ensure no one else could. When Dr. Bush naively called them, excited to collaborate, the response was chilling: "We already know it works. We have the data." Click. They hung up. No follow-up. No discussion. Just silence. His mentor delivered the hard truth: "That patent wasn’t for research—it was a barrier. They don’t want this reaching patients." Think about that. A potential cure—locked away. Not because it failed, but because profit motives outweighed lives. How many other treatments are buried this way? How many people died waiting for a therapy that already existed—but was blocked? The system isn’t failing. It’s working as designed—to protect monopolies, not patients.

Video Transcript AI Summary

The speaker made chemotherapy breakthroughs in 2008 using a vitamin A compound and excitedly shared the discovery. The speaker's mentor predicted it would take 25 years to implement, but it never happened. A pharmaceutical company held a broad patent on vitamin A compounds as chemotherapeutic agents. The speaker contacted the company, but after answering questions about cancer types, treatment duration, and apoptosis, the call abruptly ended. The company became unresponsive. The speaker's mentor revealed the patent was a "blocking patent" designed to suppress the discovery rather than generate profit.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: When I made some breakthroughs in chemotherapy in 02/2008, I was so excited. I was like, ran down the hall to my buddies in the world, and it's like, look at what just happened. Like, this is freaking crazy. It's a vitamin A compound, and look what freaking is happening to these cancer cells. Went back to my mentor, was like, Alright, so breakthrough, now what? And she's like, The best case scenario will be twenty five years before those guys down the hall are able to practice what you discovered. Wow. Twenty five years. It turned out it would never come to be, because as I moved into clinical trials, one of the pharmaceutical companies had patented vitamin A compounds broadly, as a chemotherapeutic agent. So I called them up naively, very excited, you know, got this thing working, doing this and that. And it was literally three questions. What type of cancers do you think it treats? How long do you think you would have to treat for? Do you think it actually is getting at the apoptosis or suicide of the cell itself? So I not only do I think, I can show you the data and blah blah blah, click. It was literally hung up on me. And I just thought line went dead, or I lost my line. Call back, no answer, no answer. Finally, after a few days of no contact, I go to my mentor and explain the situation. She's like, you should have never called. Like, she's like, that is not a patent that is there for for monetary gain. That is something called a blocking patent, making sure that this thing doesn't come to light.

@newstart_2024 — Camus

Posted - August 11, 2025 at 8:00 PM

Saved - August 12, 2025 at 6:14 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

I’ve been reflecting on the troubling trend in the pharmaceutical industry where off-patent drugs like hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin are neglected in favor of high-priced orphan treatments. Once a drug loses exclusivity, profit margins plummet, and Big Pharma shifts focus to lucrative biologics. This prioritization stifles innovation and suppresses affordable, effective treatments. The industry seems committed to pushing costly "innovations" while disregarding proven solutions, ultimately harming patients and the field of medicine. The call for unbiased research and accessible medicine remains urgent.

@newstart_2024 - Camus

Dr. Sabine Hazan, a leading expert in gastroenterology and microbiome research, sheds light on a critical issue in the pharmaceutical industry: the abandonment of off-patent drugs in favor of high-priced "orphan" treatments. "Hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin are off-patent. Once a drug loses exclusivity, profit margins shrink—sometimes to as little as $300 per treatment. Big Pharma isn’t interested in $300 drugs. They want blockbuster biologics and orphan drugs, where they can name their price. They’ll take a rare genetic condition, classify it as ‘orphan,’ and suddenly charge whatever they want. Look at the shift from Prilosec (a few hundred dollars) to biologics like Remicade—$10,000 a month. Once that door opened, every company followed. Now, they refuse to go back."* The problem? Research costs are high, but innovation is being stifled. There’s a deliberate movement suppressing off-patent drugs—like hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin—despite their potential. Why? Because the system is built to chase profit, not cures. The attacks on affordable, repurposed medicines aren’t about science—they’re about control. "The industry won’t reverse course. They’ll keep pushing expensive ‘innovations’ while ignoring proven, low-cost solutions. Patients lose. Medicine loses. When will it stop?" — Dr. Sabine Hazan The fight for unbiased research and accessible medicine continues. Share if you believe in putting patients over profits.

Video Transcript AI Summary

Like hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin are no are out of patents. So because they're out of patents, you cannot make any money on these drugs. The most you could sell them for is, $300 Pharmaceutical companies are no longer interested in $300 drugs. They're interested in orphan drugs where they can get name your price for a drug. We're going to put it under an orphan and now we can bill whatever we want. From like $300 to $10,000 a month. Then all these companies started copying and doing biologic at $10,000 a month. But there is a movement that is controlling the research and stopping innovations, that is stopping out of patent drugs, drugs that are basically like hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin. So I think that's the number one thing and the attacks on that.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Like hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin are no are out of patents. So because they're out of patents, you cannot make any money on these drugs. The most you could sell them for is, $300 Pharmaceutical companies are no longer interested in $300 drugs. They're interested in orphan drugs where they can get name your price for a drug. They're no longer interested. And even the drug, diseases, they basically find, you know, some kind of weird genetic pattern and say, oh, this is a rare condition. We're going to put it under an orphan and now we can bill whatever we want. So, you know, the, and you and I have seen, you know, the Remicade way, you know, we went, I went from Prilosec, which was at the time probably about a couple $100. Right. And then we went to biologics, which that was a huge jump, right? From like $300 to $10,000 a month. And they got away with it. Then all these companies started copying and doing biologic at $10,000 a month. So the problem is they don't want to go back. They want to move forward. Now, granted research is expensive. You need to pay for these things, etcetera. And the cost of research has gone up. But there is a movement that is controlling the research and stopping innovations, that is stopping out of patent drugs, drugs that are basically like hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin. So I think that's the number one thing and the attacks on that.

@dr_ericberg — Dr. Eric Berg

Posted - September 2, 2025 at 1:00 PM

Saved - September 2, 2025 at 4:12 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

Ozempic costs $1500 in the US but only $147 in Canada due to the influence of Pharmacy Benefit Managers (PBMs). These middlemen manipulate drug prices by charging employers high prices while paying pharmacies less, pocketing the difference. PBMs also control which drugs are covered by insurance, often favoring those that pay the highest rebates. This system leads to inflated prices for patients, while PBMs profit significantly. Unlike Canada, where the government negotiates prices directly, the US system benefits these shadowy middlemen.

@dr_ericberg - Dr. Eric Berg

Why does Ozempic cost $1500 in the US… but only $147 in Canada? Same drug, same dose, different country. It’s not Big Pharma. It’s something even worse: 🧵 https://t.co/ETZ4vhkNji

@dr_ericberg - Dr. Eric Berg

Imagine this: Your neighbor in Canada gets a life-saving drug for $147. But just across the border, you’re paying $1500. It’s not because of Big Pharma. It’s not because of the drug itself. The real reason is much sneakier.

@dr_ericberg - Dr. Eric Berg

There’s an invisible middleman manipulating drug prices. You’ve probably never heard of them. But they make more money than the top 10 drug companies combined. They’re called PBMs, or Pharmacy Benefit Managers.

@dr_ericberg - Dr. Eric Berg

Here’s how PBMs work: Let’s say you order a $15 burger at a restaurant. Before your order goes through, a guy steps in and says: “If the restaurant wants to sell you that burger, they have to pay me $5. Otherwise, you don’t get it.” That’s what a PBM does. https://t.co/D3hphlNbPD

Video Transcript AI Summary

Speaker 0: The pharmacy benefit managers. Speaker 1: Think of it like this. So you go to a restaurant and you order a burger. Okay? And let's say that burger costs $15. But before your order goes through, some guy steps in and says, hold on. If the restaurant wants to sell you that burger, they need to pay me $5. And if not, you can't have the burger. Speaker 0: Think of them as the toll bridge between you and drug prices. Speaker 1: But the PBM isn't just collecting the toll. They're also controlling which cars can pass. They own the bridge. They set the price of gas. They use their contracts to profit off of everyone crossing. Speaker 1: So the PBM charges the employer a very high price. It pays the pharmacy a very low price, and it keeps the difference, and that's called spread pricing.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: The pharmacy benefit managers. Speaker 1: Think of it like this. So you go to a restaurant and you order a burger. Okay? And let's say that burger costs $15. But before your order goes through, some guy steps in and says, hold on. If the restaurant wants to sell you that burger, they need to pay me $5. And if not, you can't have the burger. Speaker 0: Think of them as the toll bridge between you and drug prices. Speaker 1: But the PBM isn't just collecting the toll. They're also controlling which cars can pass. They own the bridge. They set the price of gas. They use their contracts to profit off of everyone crossing. Speaker 0: On the outside, the pharmacy benefit managers appear to be very helpful. They negotiate lower prices from the manufacturing companies. They also reduce out of pocket expenses. And, of course, they also handle the complex logistics between employers and insurance companies. Speaker 1: So the PBM charges the employer a very high price. It pays the pharmacy a very low price, and it keeps the difference, and that's called spread pricing.

@dr_ericberg - Dr. Eric Berg

PBMs act like toll booths between you and your medication. But they don’t just collect tolls. They also decide which cars can pass, set the price of gas, and own the road. They control what drugs are covered, what you pay, and which pharmacy you can use.

@dr_ericberg - Dr. Eric Berg

On the surface, PBMs sound helpful: • They negotiate lower prices • They reduce out-of-pocket costs • They coordinate with insurers But here’s what’s really happening behind the scenes…

@dr_ericberg - Dr. Eric Berg

This is called spread pricing. The PBM charges your employer a high price, pays the pharmacy a low price, and keeps the difference. Everyone thinks they saved money. But in reality, the PBM just skimmed a massive profit off your meds.

@dr_ericberg - Dr. Eric Berg

Let’s use insulin as an example. It costs around $5 to manufacture a month’s supply. But you might be paying up to $1000. Why? Because hundreds of those dollars go to the PBM. Not the pharmacy. Not the drugmaker. And it doesn’t stop there… https://t.co/X2YxPoMyDn

@dr_ericberg - Dr. Eric Berg

PBMs also control which drugs your insurance covers. If a drug company wants its product on the list, it must pay the PBM a rebate. No rebate means no coverage.

@dr_ericberg - Dr. Eric Berg

So what do drug companies do? They raise their list prices just to afford the PBM’s cut. The PBM keeps the rebate and promotes that drug on your plan. Not because it’s the best option, but because it paid the most.

@dr_ericberg - Dr. Eric Berg

Here’s what that means for you: • You pay more • Pharmacies earn less • PBMs profit the most And it doesn’t end there. PBMs also own the insurance companies.

@dr_ericberg - Dr. Eric Berg

Here’s what that looks like: • CVS Caremark is a PBM that owns Aetna • Express Scripts owns its own mail-order pharmacy • OptumRx owns UnitedHealth Together, they control 80% of all prescriptions in the United States.

@dr_ericberg - Dr. Eric Berg

These companies are no longer just middlemen. They’ve become the gatekeepers of medicine. They decide what you get, how much you pay, where you can buy it, and whether you get it at all.

@dr_ericberg - Dr. Eric Berg

While Americans are paying $1000 for insulin, Canadians pay just $18. Why the difference? Because Canada doesn’t allow PBMs. The government negotiates prices directly with no middlemen or kickbacks.

@dr_ericberg - Dr. Eric Berg

Even the FTC is stepping in. It’s sued the three biggest PBMs for: • Artificially inflating insulin prices • Marking up cancer and HIV drugs • Hiding billions in secret rebates And yes, the PBMs are pushing back. https://t.co/7C5izo2Xe8

Video Transcript AI Summary

The FTC sued the largest three PBMs. The FTC accuses these three companies for artificial inflating insulin prices, investigating their rebate system. There were marked up specialty drugs for cancer, HIV, and other conditions by over $7,300,000,000. One of the companies actually countersued the FTC over false and defamatory statements. PBMs own the insurance companies, and the pharmacies. Caremark owns CVS. Express Scripts owns a home delivery pharmacy. Rx owns Optum home delivery pharmacy, so they can ship directly to your house. Control of 80% of all the medications in The US comes from three of the biggest PBMs. In reality, the PBMs are not just the middleman. Since they've merged with the insurance companies and the pharmacies, now they're the actual gatekeepers of medicine.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Recently, the FTC sued the largest three PBMs. The FTC accuses these three companies for artificial inflating insulin prices, investigating their rebate system, There were marked up specialty drugs for cancer, HIV, and other conditions by over $7,300,000,000. One of the companies actually countersued the FTC over false and defamatory statements. What's even more wild is these pharmacy benefit managers also own the insurance companies. But now it gets even more interesting because the PBMs own the pharmacies. Caremark owns CVS. Express Scripts owns a home delivery pharmacy. Rx owns Optum home delivery pharmacy, so they can ship directly to your house. Control of 80% of all the medications in The US comes from three of the biggest PBMs. In reality, the PBMs are not just the middleman. Since they've merged with the insurance companies and the pharmacies, now they're the actual gatekeepers of medicine.

@dr_ericberg - Dr. Eric Berg

PBMs were supposed to save patients money. But instead, they’ve become billion-dollar rackets profiting off your prescriptions. The system isn’t broken. It’s working exactly as it was designed. Just not for you.

@dr_ericberg - Dr. Eric Berg

So the next time you see a $1500 price tag on a medication, remember this: It’s not the drug. It’s not the doctor. It’s the shadowy middleman that stands between you and your medicine. And most Americans have no idea.

@dr_ericberg - Dr. Eric Berg

If you found this eye-opening, share it. Because the only way to fight a rigged system is to expose it. This is not the only scheme hurting your health. To learn more about how these hidden middlemen operate, watch this video: https://youtu.be/E8CaBsGkRm4

@dr_ericberg - Dr. Eric Berg

A bit about me: I’m the creator of Healthy Keto® and Intermittent Fasting protocols, helping over 100M people make healthier choices. Follow me @dr_ericberg for more evidence-based insights to improve your health and longevity.

@dr_ericberg - Dr. Eric Berg

Thank you for reading! What is one key takeaway you gained from this thread? Share it in the comments below. I read every comment and often use them to create future content that matters to you.

@karma44921039 — karma

Posted - January 27, 2026 at 10:48 AM

Saved - January 28, 2026 at 6:25 AM

@karma44921039 - karma

The pharmaceutical companies are ran like a mafia. https://t.co/RZoY1sixew

@WallStreetApes — Wall Street Apes

Posted - February 16, 2026 at 3:15 AM

Saved - February 16, 2026 at 12:19 PM

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

American Pharmacy Worker gives a behind the scenes look at our healthcare system He shows a medication costs less than $4 to dispense Since the patient has insurance, the insurance company makes them charge $97 US Health Insurance companies should be prosecuted https://t.co/f05nj8IlPJ

Video Transcript AI Summary

Speaker 0 expresses frustration over a price discrepancy in a prescription transaction. The core facts cited are: a medication that costs $4 to dispense, when billed to the insurance, results in the patient being charged $97.06. Speaker 0 repeats the puzzling situation: “We have a claim for a prescription that costs less than $4. The insurance wants to charge the patient $97.” The concern is the patient’s likely reaction: they will be yelled at and blame CVS for the high price set by their insurance, even though the dispensing cost is described as less than $4. Speaker 0 highlights the misalignment between the pharmacy’s dispensing cost and the amount the patient is asked to pay after insurance processing, indicating a breakdown in the expected pricing flow from the pharmacy to insurance to patient. The dialogue underscores the emotional and reputational pressure on the pharmacy staff when patients perceive the price as excessive, regardless of where the markup originates. The closing sentiment, “Love you CVS,” signals a mixture of familiarity and exasperation with the CVS system or process involved in this pricing scenario, though the exact sentiment toward CVS is not elaborated beyond that line.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Hey. Come here. Tell me how this makes sense. We have a medication that costs $4 to dispense. You bill to the insurance, and they wanna charge the patient $97.06 Say that again? We have a claim for a prescription that costs less than $4 The insurance wants to charge the patient $97 So what are we gonna do? We're gonna get yelled at by the patient. And they're gonna blame us for their insurance charging them that price saying we made it that price. Love you CVS.