reSee.it - Related Post Feed

Posted - August 14, 2022 at 5:13 PM

Saved - October 24, 2023 at 9:56 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

In a distressing encounter, a PCSO visited my home, asking about drugs and my sticker. This upset me, as I've experienced rape and ongoing battles with suicide. My eldest rushed to my side. I accidentally recorded the whole conversation on video. The PCSO seemed offended by my LGBT sticker and was unaware of the LGB Alliance. She showed me her trans/pride lanyard before leaving abruptly. I received internal emails with lies about safety. The PCSO had been in my Close multiple times but only noticed my sticker recently.

@IXthoth - Bella Doe

Had another PCSO knock on my door tdy enquiring about drugs etc in area & then asked me about my sticker! She really upset me! I’ve been raped more than once, also still trying to win my battle re:Suicide. My eldest came flying down the stairs! https://t.co/PHjhe0FI8P

Video Transcript AI Summary

The speaker discusses the issue of including trans women in the category of women. They argue that not including trans women is transphobic and offensive. The speaker believes that trans people exist and should be recognized as the gender they identify with. They express concern that excluding trans women erases their experiences and perpetuates harmful ideas. The conversation becomes heated as the speaker challenges the other person's beliefs and urges them to educate themselves on the topic. The discussion touches on the issue of rape, highlighting that trans women are also vulnerable to sexual violence.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: You're told to transphobia if you don't if you're a lesbian and you don't include trans women. Right? Why would you not include trans women? Because they're men. No. They're not. But but they can't they can't do it. But then you'd have to Okay. Where you are in your thinking is very much needing a lot of enlightenment and reading. I find that very offensive, and I'd like you to take it off. But why do you find it why do you find it offensive? Because you're trying to tell people in the real world, not inside your house, outside, That trans people don't exist, that it's an idea, it's ideology, and that it being half off women, which it isn't. And it's not a point of view. That's that. So I think that is quite damaging because what you're actually doing is trying to give other people the idea of what you believe, which I think you need to do a lot more reading on, personally. And now because somebody's you about it? You're gonna keep it there because you feel that that's your right to do so. No. I don't. I want to no. But it's been it's It's faded. It's been there for so it's been there. You're this so now I'm I have alright. Can I? You can express your views in your own world. This is not inside your world, is it? Anybody who comes to your door is gonna see that. I don't own bi. I thought I said I'd keep myself for myself. It's really upsetting. Yes. It has. So But you don't think about I don't. I I think about Upsets all the trans people to say that They're they're erasing women, which is simply isn't true. The fact doesn't that Why would you not include trans women? I'd include trans women. Warren. What do you mean you have to include trans men in it? I mean, trans women. Trans women. Because they trans women get raped. You just think trans women don't get raped. Trans women get raped too. Trans women are women.

@IXthoth - Bella Doe

Only had my old iPhone to hand and pressed video record instead of voice the whole conversation is 23min long https://t.co/WtlbcrTa6d

Video Transcript AI Summary

Speaker 0 expresses concern about going to a sports group and potentially being made uncomfortable. Speaker 1 argues that trans women are women and face the same risks of rape as cisgender women. Speaker 2 agrees and emphasizes that there should be no differentiation. Speaker 0 clarifies that they are not scared, but they just want to be able to go to the sports group without any issues. Speaker 1 suggests that Speaker 0 educate themselves on the topic, as there are many support groups available. Speaker 0 expresses frustration with being told they have to educate themselves.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Keep myself to myself. Speaker 1: It's really upsetting. Yes. Speaker 0: It has. So But Speaker 1: you don't think about the Speaker 0: I I think about Upsets Speaker 1: all the trans people to say that It's really upsetting. Speaker 2: Yes. It has. So they're they're erasing women, which is simply isn't true. Speaker 0: The fact as in that if I go to a sport group without making if I'd be made, Speaker 1: right Yeah. Speaker 0: And then I go to a sport group Speaker 2: Yeah. Speaker 0: I have to Speaker 1: You don't think trans women don't get raped? Trans women get raped too. Trans women are women. Women get raped. It's really upsetting. Yes. It has. So men get raped. Trans men get raped. There's no differentiation, and nor should there be. I'm not talking about the sex Speaker 0: those who have had the Speaker 2: It's really upsetting. Yes. It has. Speaker 1: So it's difficult if you've had an experience that has colored your gen your your your your idea of what's going on in what's going on in life. However, It's Speaker 2: really upsetting you. Yes. Speaker 0: It has. So that sort of thing is just preying Speaker 1: on your fears, making you scared of something that you shouldn't be Speaker 0: scared of. Scared. I wasn't scared till I was told, but, like, Michael's offence. Now I feel No. But you're no. No. I'm not on about that. I'm on about the fact Speaker 1: that you're you're living in fear of trans Speaker 0: women. I'm not not in fear. I'm not in fear. I just want to I want yeah. Speaker 2: What do you Speaker 1: what do you want to be able to do? Speaker 0: I want to be able to go to It's really Speaker 2: upsetting you. Yes. Speaker 0: It has. So without having to know. Speaker 2: And then you're telling me that Oh, right. Yeah. Speaker 0: So this is what I'm Speaker 1: saying about you've got you've It's really upsetting you. Yes. It has. So what's in your head that a trans woman is Speaker 0: not a woman? But they're not. How are they a woman? Tell me, please. Speaker 1: How are they a woman? Okay. That's not my job educate you, that you need to educate yourself. There there's plenty. If you go on the Internet, there's tons of support groups that will help you with this. Speaker 0: But you're telling me I have to

@IXthoth - Bella Doe

https://t.co/EUiHbJSqE8

Video Transcript AI Summary

Speaker 0 explains that it's common to have fears based on past experiences, but it's important not to let those fears cloud our judgment. Speaker 1 expresses concern about trans women, but Speaker 0 encourages them to educate themselves and seek support from online groups. Speaker 1 argues that trans women are not women, but Speaker 0 emphasizes that being trans is not a belief system, but a fact. Speaker 0 clarifies that being trans is not a choice, just like being gay is not a choice. The conversation revolves around understanding and accepting transgender individuals.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: It's difficult if you've had an experience that has colored your gen your your your your idea of what's going on in what's going on in life. However, that sort of thing is just preying on your fears, making Speaker 1: you scared of something that you shouldn't be scared of. I wasn't scared until I was told, but, like, in Michael's offence. No. I feel No. But you're Speaker 0: I'm no. No. I'm not on about that. I'm on about the fact that you're you're living in fear of trans women. Speaker 1: I'm not in fear. I'm not in Yeah. I just want to get I want yeah. Speaker 0: What do you what do you want to be able to do? Speaker 1: I want to be able to go to And then you're telling me that Speaker 0: Oh, right. Yeah. So this is what I'm saying about you've got you've got in your head that a trans woman is not a woman. Speaker 1: But they're not. How are they a woman, Kelly, please? How are they a woman? Speaker 0: Okay. That's not my job to educate you, but you need to educate yourself. There there's plenty. If you go on the Internet, there's tons of support groups that will help you with this. Speaker 1: But you're telling me I have to change I've changed my belief. Speaker 0: No. It's not belief. It's not beliefs. It's facts. It's not a belief system. It's not like, do you believe in god? You know, something you can't see. It's not that's not that's not what this is. It's not again, you've got you've got to try and Speaker 1: You can't change sex. It's it's impossible to change sex. Speaker 0: It's not change. Okay? It's how you're born. It's how you're born. Now if a person is born in the wrong body and spends a good portion of their life in that wrong body, and suffers terribly from all sorts of disorders because they have been born into the wrong body to allow them to transition into the right body to enable them to feel either person that they are isn't something that doesn't exist. It isn't a choice. It's the same as being gay isn't a choice. Do you understand that being gay is not a choice? Yeah? That's what Speaker 1: I'm saying about this about Speaker 0: Yeah. So being gay is not a choice. Being trans is not a choice. It's not a choice.

@IXthoth - Bella Doe

She offended by my sticker! Pointed at her LGBT, which said that stonewall badge and she never heard of LGB Alliance. https://t.co/u8Ke6nkevp

Video Transcript AI Summary

Being born in the wrong body causes immense suffering and various disorders. Transitioning is not a choice, just like being gay. It's not something one wakes up and decides to do. It causes distress, suicide, and mental health crises until individuals find the courage to be their true selves. Offending trans women is not the intention, but rather acknowledging their existence. Comparing it to putting a sticker saying "lesbians don't have penises" is off-topic. The point is not to look at the sticker, as it implies that trans women are an idea and not real.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Have a wrong body and suffers terribly from all sorts of disorders because they have been born into the wrong body to allow them to transition into the right body, to enable them to feel be the person that they are, isn't something that doesn't exist. It isn't a choice. Just the same as being gay isn't a choice. To understand that being gay is not a choice. Yeah? That's what I'm saying about this about Yeah. So being gay is not a choice. Being trans is not a choice. It's not a choice. It's not something you just wake up one day and decide to do. It's not a choice. It causes distress. It causes suicide. It causes people, terrible mental health crises and mental ill health for many, many years until they're until they find the courage to be the person that they actually are. And it's not that they want to be. It's not that they wish to be. It's that they actually do I'm do I'm offending trans women who are women. So if I had a sicker about something else, upholding something else, and complained about it. Why should I remove that sticker? Because it's offensive. How is it offensive? Well, I shouldn't look at it. It's like me putting lesbians this. Les Mis. If I was to put lesbians don't have penis, penises. Am I offending? Who am I offending? Just you're again. You're you're you're going away from the point. The point there. You shouldn't look at it. Just because it's it's it's stating that trans peep trans women are an idea, not a not a and they don't exist.

@IXthoth - Bella Doe

She showed me her trans/pride lanyard! Before the hostile tone of ‘I’m going now’. https://t.co/dkslIzi0cQ

Video Transcript AI Summary

The speakers are discussing the idea that transgender women do not exist. One person argues that if something racist was written on a door, it would be understood why it shouldn't be there, but the concept of transgender women is different. The other person tries to explain that not all people are born with the same gender identity, but the first person insists that a man can never be a woman. They both acknowledge a big gap in understanding between them.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Point attention to? I shouldn't look at it. Because it's it's it's stating that trans peep trans women are an idea, not a not a and they don't exist, which is what your your is it your mum? Yeah. Even though is what your mum's saying. Not If you read something on there that was racist, you I'd understand why I was coming to say you shouldn't have that on your door, wouldn't you? Completely different. Why would you press different? Completely different. That's what he said. How How is it different? Completely different. How is it different? You will not first take the race as a different Because people are born a Black. Like, people are born, they're sex, mouth, would be mum. No. That's that's not again, you're you're missing the point. Not all I can urge you to do is just just read. You're just just just just I have a I hate that. I have. I am. Okay. Oh, no. Not. Sorry. I'm not I'm not educated. I'm not being educated on being a man being told that he's a woman. A man is not a woman. He never will be. He's a man. Hang Now hang on a sec. So nobody's being told anything? This is what I'm saying. That's where there's a big big gap in understanding here. It's a huge gap in understanding.

@IXthoth - Bella Doe

https://t.co/aRhn2VdTvT

@IXthoth - Bella Doe

Transcript of 1st 'Official' visit from 2 members of Police Constabulary on 11th Aug (one was officer the other pcso - nice one). Pleasant exchange albeit unsure who more 'are we seriously here having this conv' me or them https://t.co/NUxLjsTaMp

@IXthoth - Bella Doe

Lies, Lies, blantant unnecessary lies! safety my arse! This is two of three internal emails that received as per my subject area request. Police blanked out there stuff in blank, the green is what I've blanked out. 1st internal email is PCSO (yeah that one! 14th Aug) https://t.co/g9wOBIlttU

@IXthoth - Bella Doe

They sent me copy of photo which I've cropped as to side on my letter box is my house number, also in the door window panels there is a reflection of the photographer aka pcso (yeah that one!!!! 14th Aug) https://t.co/k1mm2sWWEt

@IXthoth - Bella Doe

Transcript - 14th Aug from PCSO (yeah that one!!) Since reporting my sticker having seen it 'delivering YELLOW letter' and lies so much, it turns she reveals a lot thru conv..turns out 6 X she been in my Close since yet only noticed sticker whilst she was standing there! https://t.co/4DOTeJIBtM

@richfelgate — Rich Felgate

Posted - May 7, 2023 at 1:15 PM

Saved - May 8, 2023 at 12:26 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

A filmmaker with press accreditation was arrested while filming a JustStopOil supporter holding a banner near the coronation route. The police accused them of conspiracy to commit public nuisance. The filmmaker and four protesters were searched but nothing was found. They were arrested under the Police Crime Sentencing and Courts Act 2022 and held for 18 hours. Several organizations have been tagged in the tweets.

@richfelgate - Rich Felgate

Yesterday I got arrested whilst filming a @JustStop_Oil supporter holding a banner on the pavement near the coronation route. I'm a filmmaker and had my @BECTU press accreditation visible around my neck. Police deemed this to be "conspiracy to commit a public nuisance".

Video Transcript AI Summary

Speaker 0 announces the time as 9:15 and mentions being arrested. They ask someone to double check something related to arrest in Germany. They then request the person to put something away.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Okay. For the meantime, it's, 9:15. I'm arrested. You're on arrest. Okay. For arrest in Germany. Can we just, on that one but let's just double check that. At this time, I can't you can put that away for me, sir. Put it away.

@richfelgate - Rich Felgate

After police stopped me filming, they ripped my press pass off and handcuffed me behind my back.

@richfelgate - Rich Felgate

Even before this protester held this banner up, myself and 4 protesters were surrounded by police and stop and searched to look for "articles to commit criminal damage". They didn't find anything.

@richfelgate - Rich Felgate

Police proceeded to arrest us for "conspiracy to commit public nuisance" under the Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Act 2022. I was held in police custody for 18 hours and "released under investigation". #coronation #juststopoil #republic #NotMyKing #monarchy #Democracy

@richfelgate - Rich Felgate

@RepublicStaff @netpol @NUJofficial @NUJ_LFB @libertyhq @BigBrotherWatch @paulpowlesland @AyoCaesar @novaramedia @michaeljswalker @AaronBastani @charlotterlynch @FreedomofPress @GeorgeMonbiot @IndigoRumbelow @CarolineLucas

@radleybalko — Radley Balko

Posted - June 16, 2023 at 4:51 PM

Saved - June 16, 2023 at 6:08 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

The DOJ released a report on the Minneapolis police department's two-year investigation. Notable excerpts include incidents of excessive force, racial profiling, and failure to hold bad cops accountable. The report also revealed a pattern of delayed investigations and dismissals of complaints. The city has paid over $60 million in police brutality settlements in the last five years. The report highlights the urgent need for systemic change in policing.

@radleybalko - Radley Balko

DOJ just released the report from its two-year investigation of the Minneapolis police department. Here's a thread of notable excerpts. This first one happened *while a DOJ investigator was on a ride-along.*

@radleybalko - Radley Balko

"Sit on the ground. I'm gonna mace ya."

@radleybalko - Radley Balko

Casually pepper spraying some folks who were concerned about a suicidal friend.

@radleybalko - Radley Balko

Pulling a black teen out of a car and threatening to taser him for . . . not wearing a seatbelt.

@radleybalko - Radley Balko

Can't argue with this logic. A supervisor found that some MPD cops' use of force must have been reasonable because if it wasn't reasonable force, they wouldn't have used it.

@radleybalko - Radley Balko

Read the incident, and then how the complaint was handled. The investigator was the same supervisor on the scene who failed to find any wrongdoing at the time. He then didn't bother interviewing witnesses or the complainant before clearing the cops.

@radleybalko - Radley Balko

The whiter the neighborhood, the fewer traffic stops MPD made for minor offenses. This was true even among neighborhoods with similar accident rates.

@radleybalko - Radley Balko

MPD conducts "pretextual" traffic stops of Black and Native American motorists at about six times the rate of white motorists, even though well less than 1 percent of such stops recovered guns (the main justification for conducting them).

@radleybalko - Radley Balko

Black and Native American people were far more likely to be searched during a stop, even after adjusting for stops involving similar offenses and motorist behavior.

@radleybalko - Radley Balko

After the murder of George Floyd, many MPD officers stopped recording the race of people they pull over, as required by law and policy.

@radleybalko - Radley Balko

Nothing to see here.

@radleybalko - Radley Balko

If you don't think there's racism in policing, talk to black cops.

@radleybalko - Radley Balko

Yikes

@radleybalko - Radley Balko

Dehumanizing the people they serve with a "ghetto" Christmas tree.

@radleybalko - Radley Balko

Flashbanging a group of protesters -- just for fun.

@radleybalko - Radley Balko

Casually pepper spraying journalists for no reason at all.

@radleybalko - Radley Balko

Jokesters, these guys

@radleybalko - Radley Balko

The city has paid out over $60 million in police brutality settlements over the last 5 years.

@radleybalko - Radley Balko

Step one: Create an immensely complicated system that fails to hold bad cops accountable. Step two: Tell complainants that filing a complaint isn't worth it because it's an immensely complicated system that fails to hold bad cops accountable.

@radleybalko - Radley Balko

Ghost investigations of citizen complaints.

@radleybalko - Radley Balko

This one looks a lot like what happened to George Floyd. Two years before George Floyd. Referred by the city attorney. Documented by a city employee. Never investigated.

@radleybalko - Radley Balko

You know you have a problem when a federal court won't even grant officers qualified immunity, but your official investigation finds no violation of policy.

@radleybalko - Radley Balko

MPD often "disciplines" officers by referring them for "coaching," even for serious abuse. But less than a quarter of those referrals actually result in any coaching.

@radleybalko - Radley Balko

Step one: Delay, delay, delay Step two: Dismiss complaint because "reckoning period has expired."

@radleybalko - Radley Balko

Obligatory dog shooting incident. Bonus: Supervisor cleared the cops without interviewing them, by citing fictional video footage that directly contradicts the actual video footage.

@radleybalko - Radley Balko

Keeping bad apples around, well after you have overwhelming evidence of their bad apply-ness.

@radleybalko - Radley Balko

Finally . . . come on. Corruption is one thing. But this is just lazy!

@MarioNawfal — Mario Nawfal

Posted - October 3, 2023 at 12:39 PM

Saved - October 3, 2023 at 9:13 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

A college professor arrested for refusing to return a preacher's microphone after graphically describing her abortion. She taunts the preacher, claiming to earn more. Despite being asked by police, she refuses to let go and is arrested. Was it free speech? Should the officer have arrested her?

@MarioNawfal - Mario Nawfal

Is This Free Speech? A college professor gets arrested for refusing to hand back a street preacher's microphone. She graphically describes HAVING AN ABORTION - "They yanked my fetus from my uterus, and I'm so happy, and I'm so grateful" She then taunts the preacher "and I earn more than you" The woman refuses to let go of the microphone, even when asked by police, so she is arrested. Was the professor exercising Free Speech? Should the officer have arrested her?

Video Transcript AI Summary

Speaker 0 expresses that God loves everyone, while Speaker 1 shares their lack of regret over having an abortion. Speaker 2 interjects briefly. Speaker 1 mentions being a professor and having more money. Speaker 0 asks for Speaker 1's name, but they refuse to share it. Speaker 0 introduces themselves as Ricky Castro and offers to pray for Speaker 1. Speaker 1 thanks them. Speaker 0 requests Speaker 1's name again, but they decline. Speaker 1 is accused of ruining everyone's lunch. Speaker 0 asks for their microphone back repeatedly. Speaker 1 eventually returns it. Speaker 0 wishes them a good day and asserts their strength. Speaker 0 calls an officer, claiming Speaker 1 is assaulting themselves. Speaker 1 denies it. The officer intervenes and arrests Speaker 1. Speaker 0 mentions praying for them.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: God loves you, man. It it is the love of god or why you're angry or why you're mad. Speaker 1: I had an abortion 2 years ago, and I don't regret it at all. They yanked the fetus out of my uterus. They yanked the fetus out of my uterus, and I'm so happy. Okay. I'm so grateful. Speaker 2: Okay. Speaker 0: And Speaker 1: I'm a professor at this university Speaker 0: Okay. Speaker 1: And I make more money than you. Speaker 0: Okay. Speaker 1: And what else? Speaker 0: What's your name? Speaker 1: Best son of your business. Speaker 0: I mean, we're being cordial here. You Garrett got my mic. We're being cordial. Right? Yeah. Speaker 1: We're being cordial. Speaker 0: We're being cordial. Speaker 2: My my Speaker 0: name is Ricky Castro. Nice to meet you. Nice to meet you. I mean, nice to meet you. Is that you just came up here to tell us your Is this without giving us your name? Speaker 1: Yeah. That's what I did. Speaker 0: Okay. Alright. We'll we'll we'll pray for you. Okay? We'll pray to lord save you. Speaker 1: Thank you. Speaker 0: K. No problem. What I wish I knew your name so we can know where to pray. Well, either either way either way Speaker 2: Mhmm. Speaker 0: You're a soul. Either way, you're a soul. What what makes me that? Speaker 1: You kinda ruined everybody's lunch. They're like, oh, you took the court You have Speaker 0: to report out. Yes, sir. You won't give me my bike mic back. Please please give me Speaker 2: my mic back. Please please give Speaker 0: me my mic back. Please please give me my mic back. Please please jump the leg. Thank you. Thank you. Have a have a good day. Okay? You're not stronger than me. Alright? God bless you. God bless you. God bless you. Hey. Hey. Hey, officer. I wanna Speaker 2: assault This Speaker 0: young lady won't Speaker 2: she's trying to Speaker 0: rip herself up. Speaker 1: Oh, I'm assaulting her. She's assault she's taking his you. I would literally flash out. Like that. Hi. No. It's not. Okay. You should probably let Speaker 2: him have this. I do. I do. Speaker 1: We're gonna ask you. Speaker 0: Seat. Can I? K. We need to let go right now or you're under arrest. Walk away right now. I already said I would Can I get myself? Can can I get myself, ma'am? You're under arrest. Put your hands behind you. We we pray for the grace of God for you.

@calvinrobinson — Dcn Calvin Robinson

Posted - October 26, 2023 at 10:48 AM

Saved - October 26, 2023 at 6:46 PM

@calvinrobinson - Dcn Calvin Robinson

Isabel Vaughan-Spruce has been given a fixed penalty notice by the Thought Police. Clearly not protesting. Clearly not harassing anyone. Clearly causing no harm. Arrested for silently praying in her head, again! https://t.co/sjV4QkqOXO

Video Transcript AI Summary

Speaker 0 questions Speaker 1 about their presence at an abortion center. Speaker 1 clarifies that they are not part of an organized protest or affiliated with any pro-life or pro-choice organization. Speaker 1 also states that they are not protesting or praying for unborn children, but rather praying at the location. Speaker 0 informs Speaker 1 about a public protection order in place and accuses them of breaching it. Speaker 1 denies breaching the order and refuses to move outside the exclusion zone, asserting their right to be there. Speaker 0 explains that a fixed penalty notice will be issued for failure to comply with the order. Speaker 1 reiterates that they are not protesting, just praying.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Are you here as part of an organised protest? No. You're not. Are you part of a pro life organisation or pro choice organisation? Speaker 1: I am, but I'm not here in that Speaker 0: capacity. Okay. Are you protesting? No. Are you here to pray for the lives of your unborn children? That it's Speaker 1: a little bit leading, but no. I'm not. Speaker 0: Okay. Speaker 1: Prayer? I can pray elsewhere, but I I want to pray here today. Speaker 0: Right. Why have you chosen the location here stand? Speaker 1: You know this is an abortion centre that I'm standing outside of. Mhmm. Yeah. Speaker 0: Okay. Are you aware that there is a public case protection order in place here? Speaker 1: Yes. I am. Speaker 0: Okay. Are you aware that you're breaching a public protection order? I'm not. No. Will you move from here to outside the exclusion zone? Speaker 1: I I don't believe I need to. Speaker 0: Okay. If not, why are you not willing to move outside of the exclusion zone? Speaker 1: Because I don't believe I need to. I believe I've got a right to be here. Speaker 0: Okay. Right. If you believe that you're present to press in any form, obviously we're going to need to issue with a fixed penalty note. Speaker 1: Can you explain that again? Speaker 0: Yes, we've if you believe that you're present to protect in any form Speaker 1: If I'm if I believe what? Sorry. Speaker 0: If you believe that you are present to protest in any Speaker 1: I'm not here to protest. No. Speaker 0: Right. Well, you're in the PSPO. You you you're breaching it. Speaker 1: I'm in the zone Yes. But I'm not protesting. Speaker 0: Yes. So you're gonna be giving the fleets penalty notice today. Okay? And that will be given to you with the offence and failure to cope with the public space protection order under the Antisocial Behaviour Crime and Policing Act 2014. And my colleague's gonna yet. Just to make Speaker 1: it clear, I'm not protesting. Speaker 0: Okay. But you know you can't do here. I'll just point out the PSPO from there. I think you've seen that before. Speaker 1: I know there's a zone here, but I'm not protesting within the zone. I'm just finally praying.

@BillboardChris — Billboard Chris 🇨🇦🇺🇸

Posted - November 8, 2023 at 9:42 PM

Saved - November 8, 2023 at 9:52 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

The @metpoliceuk warned me that if I return to the UK, I'll be charged with a "hate crime." Detective Chief Inspector Marcus Shapps called me about the incident where a person jabbed a flag in my face. They identified the person as a transgender woman. I mentioned that children can't consent to puberty blockers, as confirmed by the High Court. Shapps asked for my passport number, but I refused. He retired the next day. I filed a report with @BTP and plan to return to the UK. Children's well-being matters, and I'll continue to speak up.

@BillboardChris - Billboard Chris 🇨🇦🇺🇸

I have been informed by the @metpoliceuk that if I return to the UK I will be remanded into custody, and charged with a “hate crime.” The very unprofessional Detective Chief Inspector Marcus Shapps called me on Sunday, November 6th to speak with me about the incident where someone who appeared to be a woman came and jabbed her flag and flagstick in my face. I was told on Sunday the police would attempt to identify her and potentially charge her with common assault. I declined to file a complaint against the @BTP officer at the time — Police Sergeant 5558. Today I received a phone call from DCI Marcus Shapps, collar number 782EA, who wanted to know if I was still in the UK. He said they had made contact with the ‘woman,’ that ‘she’ is a transgender woman (an erroneous term for a man), and that I would be remanded into custody and charged with a “hate crime” if I return to the UK. I am most certainly guilty of standing quietly with a sign that says ‘Children Cannot Consent to Puberty Blockers.’ If that causes offence to someone, so be it. I pointed out to DCI Shapps how in December of 2020, the High Court of England itself declared that children cannot give informed consent to puberty blockers, and how the NHS is even putting a stop to this child abuse. I told him I would love nothing better than to face this ridiculous charge and “I’ll see you soon,” at which point DCI Shapps said to me “Is that a threat?” No, detective, it’s not a threat. It means I would be overjoyed to expose your ridiculous police service to the entire world. He then asked for my passport number so that he could inform UK border control. I declined to give it to him, and he hung up the phone. I tried to make contact several more times via phone, but the @metpoliceuk non-emergency line was down. When DCI Shapps learned that my calls were just heading to voicemail, his response was “Womp womp, too bad.” This whole thing is so absurd, I question his legitimacy but the phone number goes to the UK non-emergency line. He says he’s retiring tomorrow. When I asked for the name of the @BTP officer via text, he did not respond, but then messaged me via WhatsApp, saying “To gain PS 5558’s name you will have to travel to the UK and request it from a British Transport Police station.” I have filed a report with the @BTP for more info, and I intend to return to the UK sometime in the New Year. To the @metpoliceuk, children cannot consent to puberty blockers, and I’ll keep saying it wherever I please. Sorry you support this child abuse.

Video Transcript AI Summary

Speaker 0 asks Speaker 1 why they are there repeatedly. Speaker 1 explains they are there to have conversations and wear a sign about children and puberty blockers. Speaker 2 asks Speaker 1 to move for their safety due to angry people nearby. Speaker 1 questions why they should move instead of dealing with the violent individuals. Speaker 2 states they are there to keep Speaker 1 safe and suggests moving to prevent a breach of the peace. Speaker 1 argues that they are not causing the aggression. Speaker 2 insists that Speaker 1's presence is causing the breach. Speaker 1 continues to stand their ground. Speaker 2 agrees to speak to the aggressive individuals if they approach Speaker 1 again.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Why are you here? Why are you here? I'm here Speaker 1: to have a conversation. Don't put that in my face. Speaker 0: Why are you here? Why are you here? Why are you here? Speaker 1: I'm here to Speaker 0: have a conversation. Why is Speaker 1: Come on. I'm I'm allowed to stand here. Yeah. I'm gonna ask you Speaker 2: to move away for your own safety because they're obviously quite Speaker 0: I'm here to have a conversation. Why are you here? Mate, it's with you, aren't they? Okay. So now I'm standing here. So which way do you want me to go? I'll go over Speaker 2: a bit further, and I'll have a chat with you. Speaker 1: Like, on this street? Speaker 2: Yeah. Just go over onto that island there, and I'll Okay. Speaker 1: So you're telling me I'm not allowed to stand on this public speaker. Speaker 0: Telling you Speaker 1: at the moment, I've Speaker 2: I'm moving you over there to prevent the breach the pace. Speaker 0: Come on. Speaker 2: Come over there and let's Speaker 1: talk to Wait a minute. People coming and getting a live face, it means I'm breaching the police. Speaker 2: Them to do that, aren't you? So How Speaker 1: how am I doing that? Speaker 2: Move over I know I have a chat with you. Speaker 1: How am I causing them to do that? Speaker 2: Well, I don't know what you're doing, Speaker 1: but you're getting understanding that. You're getting extremely hostile. They're getting hostile with me. I've got it all on video. Speaker 2: Okay. That's fine. And you've got me on video? Yeah. Alright. So this is for your safety because when I walked past, there was a large group of people Who are very angry with you. Okay? So I believe your presence at that location was cut packed to cause breach of the peace. So for your safety, I've asked you to move because it's a lot easier than moving a lot of people left this guy. Speaker 1: So Why are we getting in their face? So I can't stand I wasn't. They're getting in my face. Speaker 2: Okay. So why are they getting in your face? Why are they getting in your face? What Speaker 0: Why are you here? I'm here to have conversations. Why are you here? Are they aggravate you here? Speaker 1: Because I'm wearing a sign that says children cannot consent to puberty blockers. Yeah. Speaker 2: So you're entitled have to protest and so on and so forth. Speaker 1: I'm not even protesting. I just have conversations with people. Okay. Speaker 2: But if you're getting a reaction like that, you need to remove yourself from it. So you're all safe. Speaker 1: Wait a minute. How about you deal with the violent people instead of telling the peaceful person to get out of the way? Speaker 2: Well, I'm speaking to you. Speaker 1: I'm I. There's no problem. They're the ones that were getting violent. Okay. Because you were president. I'm here to look Speaker 2: at you Speaker 0: to keep Speaker 2: you safe. Okay? Speaker 1: The ones who were briefed in the peace, if I may speak. No. No. You were causing Speaker 2: a breach at the pace, Speaker 0: but you Speaker 2: you were hating that. Okay? Speaker 1: I've told you. Speaker 2: I've told you. We're not obviously not gonna agree, are we? So do not go back over Because your presence there is like the cause breach of the peace. If you wish to walk around with your banner, then do it over there. Okay? Speaker 1: So let me clarify one thing here. Speaker 2: Yeah. Speaker 1: If I stand peacefully and people come and get aggressive with me, I'm the one breaching Speaker 2: the people. Presence at that is causing people to do that, then yes. Okay? Speaker 1: I'm not gonna ask you to disagree with the audition. Me is my fault. Speaker 2: Okay. Is Speaker 1: that what you're saying? Speaker 2: Your behavior is causing the breach of That's what I'm saying to you. Speaker 1: Other people getting violent is my Okay. Speaker 2: That's the breach of the peace, isn't it? Speaker 1: Okay. And Okay. And your presence there. And if Speaker 2: I You're being argumentative. You're not listening to I'm telling you. Speaker 0: I Speaker 2: am. Okay? I'm here to make sure that you're safe. I'm not wrong. Speaker 1: I'm telling you. That I'm standing here peacefully Speaker 2: You can stay here peacefully. Speaker 1: And what about when they come here? They won't be come in here, will they? If they do, I'll Speaker 2: be going straight to them. Okay. So they'll Speaker 1: be coming here, and the same thing will happen again. So I hope you speak to them that time instead of blaming the victim. Speaker 2: Okay. You believe you're a victim. What I saw is what I saw. Is your presence caught in the breach of the Speaker 1: Yes. My presence standing peacefully is causing other people to get aggressive. Alright. Well, I'll stand here then. Speaker 2: Okay. That's fine. Speaker 0: And when Speaker 1: they come here and they get in my face again, what are you gonna do about it back then? Speaker 2: To you, then I will speak to them. Okay? I can only deal with what I saw.

@shellenberger — Michael Shellenberger

Posted - April 2, 2024 at 10:07 PM

Saved - April 2, 2024 at 11:24 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

A group in Scotland protested a new hate speech law, criminalizing free speech. The law allows the government to arrest people who refuse to use certain pronouns. This issue extends beyond Scotland, as pro-censorship forces in the US and EU are pushing for more censorship. European political leaders are using intelligence agencies to smear individuals and influence elections. The EU's focus on "foreign manipulation" is a tactic to demonize their political opponents. The censors are on the offensive, but we are starting to fight back by exposing government disinformation and advocating for free speech. Support our cause by subscribing and watching the full video.

@shellenberger - Michael Shellenberger

THIS IS SCARY Yesterday, a group of people in Scotland protested a new hate speech law. "The irony of this hateful, spiteful law coming into play on April's Fools Day..." said one of the protesters. "Criminalizing free speech in this country is absolutely disgraceful." While I was happy to see the protest, I am deeply alarmed that the Scottish government passed the law in the first place. @JK_Rowling rightly wrote on X that the law gives the government the power to arrest people who refuse to call male rapists and murderers “women” and “she” and “her” if that’s what those men demand. The Hate Crime and Public Order Act of 2021 creates a new crime for "stirring up hatred," including related to trans identity. People can be arrested for things they say in the privacy of their own home. They can be arrested for simply being "insulting." And prosecutors need only prove your stirring up of hatred was "likely" not "intended." You might think this all has nothing to do with you. You don’t live in Scotland. But it has everything to do with you. What you say online could be held as criminal hate speech in Scotland, simply by somebody reading it there. And it’s not just Scotland. In the US, pro-censorship forces hope a Supreme Court victory will let them once again ramp up censorship demands by the Department of Homeland Security and the FBI. EU officials are putting in place a sweeping online censorship system that far exceeds in power and scope anything attempted under Communism or fascism. And last week, European political leaders weaponized their intelligence and security agencies in order to smear everyone from German farmers to conservative politicians as “Russia-linked.” And yet the United States and EU governments pump far more money than Russia into “non-governmental” organizations like the Institute for Strategic Dialogue, the Aspen Institute, and the Atlantic Council to wage influence campaigns aimed at smearing ordinary farmers and truckers as “Russian-linked” and “far-right,” and influencing elections. To understand how ridiculous and totalitarian the EU’s focus on “foreign manipulation” is, consider the fact that, during the Cold War, the US government’s Central Intelligence Agency not only allowed Americans to read Soviet newspapers but actually translated them into English and sent them to thousands of libraries across the United States. Just think about it: do Europeans really need Russians, “Russia-linked” individuals, or “individuals echoing Moscow” to be angry about high energy prices and uncontrolled immigration? The entire “Russia influence” narrative coming from European politicians and intelligence agencies rests upon the monstrous insult that Europeans would be compliant were it not for Russians sowing discontent. This is an old political trick: characterize your enemies as foreigners. It’s also a trick of totalitarians. What’s driving all of this? Part of it is that EU politicians are trying to influence the June elections by demonizing their political opponents as puppets of Russia. But another part of it appears to be driven by genuine hatred. Just listen to Scotland First Minister @HumzaYousaf condemning the Scottish government on racial terms. “Why are we so surprised by the most senior positions in Scotland filled by those who are white?" he said. "Lord President — white. Every high court judge — white!” Humza suggests that the reason for all of this is because Scottish people are racist. But the real reason is that 95% of Scottish people are white. The fact that Humza, a nonwhite Muslim, is the highest-ranking Scottish politician is a sign of how non-racist the Scottish people are. For Humza to reach the top political job in Scotland and insist that the reason he’s so rare is because the Scottish people are racist is itself hateful, and pathological. The bad news is that the censors are on the offensive and we are on the defensive. In the US, Europe, Scotland, Germany, Ireland, Canada, and Brazil, an alliance of government agencies, government-funded think tanks, and corporate media are demanding more censorship, whether through laws like the one enacted in Scotland or through executive actions by agencies like the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and FBI. The good news is we are starting to find our footing. We have been proud to publish investigations that have uncovered government disinformation and censorship demands in Germany, the Czech Republic, Ireland, Canada, and Brazil. These investigations reveal the same cast of characters, including intelligence and security agencies, mainstream news media, and ostensibly “non-governmental” organizations that happen to be heavily funded by governments. As importantly, we can expose the hatred behind the hate speech policies, and continue to point out that the solution to hate speech is free speech, not censorship. The way to counter hate is to do what Darryl Davis did, which was persuade KKK members to see him as a human being, and to give up their white robes. Davis will be the first person to tell you that he couldn’t have done his work with censorship, only with freedom of speech. There’s much we need to do...

Video Transcript AI Summary

A group in Scotland protested a new hate speech law, criticizing it as draconian. The law criminalizes free speech, including misgendering, and can lead to arrests for insulting speech. This issue extends beyond Scotland, with censorship efforts in the US and EU. The focus on foreign manipulation is seen as a political tactic. The solution to hate speech is free speech, exemplified by Daryl Davis's approach to persuading KKK members. The fight against censorship and hate speech policies continues globally.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Yesterday, a group of people in Scotland protested a new hate speech law. Speaker 1: The irony of this hateful, spiteful, hate crime law coming into play on April fools day. Speaker 0: But I know Speaker 1: You couldn't make this up, but the nation's traditional practical joke day hums are useless, and friends, along with police Scotland, enforce such a draconian new law, criminalizing free speech in this country. Is absolutely disgraceful. Speaker 0: While I was happy to see the protest, I am deeply alarmed that the Scottish government passed this law in the first place. J. K. Rowling rightly noted on acts that the law gives the government the power to arrest people who refuse to call even male rapists and murderers women or she and her, if that's what those men demand. The Hate Crime and Public Order Act of 2021 creates a new crime for quote, stirring up hatred including related to trans identity. People can even be arrested for things they say in the privacy of their own home. You can be arrested for being simply insulting. Prosecutors need only prove your stirring up of hatred was likely, not even intended. Now, you might think this has nothing to do with you. You don't live in Scotland, you may not even live in Europe, but it has everything to do with you. What you say online could be held as criminal hate speech in Scotland, simply by fact of somebody there reading it. And it's not just Scotland. In the US, pro censorship forces hope a supreme court victory will let them once again ramp up censorship demands by the Department of Homeland Security and the FBI. EU officials are putting in place a sweeping online censorship system that far exceeds in power and scope anything attempted under communism or fascism. And last week, European political leaders weaponized their intelligence and security agencies in order to smear everyone from German farmers to conservative politicians as supposedly Russia linked. And yet, the United States and EU governments pump far more money than Russia does into non governmental organizations like the Institute For Strategic Dialogue, the Aspen Institute and the Atlantic Council to wage influence campaigns aimed at smearing ordinary farmers and truckers as Russia linked or far right, while influencing European elections. To understand how ridiculous and totalitarian the EU's focus on foreign manipulation is, consider the fact that during the Cold War, the US Government Central Intelligence Agency not only allowed Americans to read Soviet Newspapers, but actually translated them into English and sent them to thousands of libraries across the United States. Just think about it. Do Europeans really need Russians or Russian linked individuals or individuals echoing Moscow to be angry about high energy prices and uncontrolled immigration? The entire Russia influence narrative coming from European politicians and intelligence agencies rests upon this monstrous insult that Europeans would be compliant were it not for Russians sowing discontent. This is an old political trick. Characterize your enemies as foreigners. It's also a trick of totalitarians. So what's driving all this? Well, part of it is that EU politicians are trying to influence the June elections by demonizing their political opponents as puppets of Russia. But another part of it appears to be driven by genuine hatred. Just listen to Scotland First Minister, Yousef Hamza, condemning the Scottish government on racial terms. Speaker 1: The Lord President, white. The Lord Justice Clark, white. Every high court judge, white. The Lord Advocate, white. Speaker 0: Hamza suggests that the reason for all this is because Scottish people are racists. But the real reason is that 95% of Scottish people are white. The fact that Hamza, a non white Muslim is the highest ranking Scottish politician is a sign of how non racist the Scottish people are. For HMSA to reach the top political job in Scotland and then insist that the reason he's so rare is because the Scottish people are racist, is it self hateful. The bad news is that the censors are on the offensive and we're on the defensive. In the US, Europe, Scotland, Germany, Ireland, Canada, Brazil, an alliance of government agencies, government funded think tanks, and corporate news media have come together to demand ever more censorship, whether through laws like the one just enacted in Scotland or through executive actions by agencies like the US Department of Homeland Security and the FBI. The good news is, we're starting to find our footing. We've been proud to publish a series of investigative pieces which have uncovered government disinformation and censorship initiatives in Germany, Ireland and Brazil. Those investigations reveal the exact same cast of characters worldwide including the Czech Republic, the EU, Canada and other parts of the world by intelligence and security agencies, the news media and NGOs which happen to be heavily funded by governments. As importantly, we can expose the hatred behind the hate speech policies. Continue to point out that the solution to hate speech is free speech, not censorship. The way to counter hate is to do what Daryl Davis did, which was persuade KKK members to see him as a human being and to give up their white robes. Speaker 2: After it's over, Daryl Davis hangs around backstage with his friend, clan wizard Roger Kelly. It's not unusual for blacks and whites to be friends, but it is unusual to find a black man and a clan leader chatting pleasantly over an orange soda after a clan rally. Speaker 0: Davis will be the first to tell you that he could not have done his work with censorship, only with freedom of speech. There's still a lot we need to do.

@shellenberger - Michael Shellenberger

Please subscribe now to support the fight against sudden-onset totalitarianism and to watch the full video! https://t.co/DtlXMS4P75

@shellenberger — Michael Shellenberger

Posted - April 16, 2024 at 2:03 PM

Saved - April 16, 2024 at 4:55 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

Police in Brussels shut down a conservative political gathering featuring Nigel Farage, displaying totalitarian tactics. The mayor of Brussels is preventing conservatives from exercising their right to free speech. The mayor responsible for this violation is compared to Nazis and Communists. The mayor also hosted a radical Islamicist Iranian mayor last year. The actions of the police and mayors violate the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights. Western leaders must take action to restore freedom and democracy in Belgium. Anti-fascist activists have been mobilizing against the conference.

@shellenberger - Michael Shellenberger

This is outrageous totalitarianism and must be condemned by all Western political leaders, no matter where you sit on the political spectrum. Police officers in Brussels shut down a conservative political gathering while former UK politician @Nigel_Farage was on stage. This is the kind of thuggish gangsterism that we rightly associate with Nazism and Communism. Shame on the police and mayor of Brussels for this totalitarian tactic! "The police document," reports The Telegraph, "suggested speeches by speakers including Nigel Farage and Suella Braverman could lead to public disorder or display racist and homophobic views." Apparently, the police have, for now, allowed the conference to go on. But they have blocked any new people from entering.

@shellenberger - Michael Shellenberger

This goes far beyond "cancel culture." This is the mayor of Brussels, the seat of the European Union's government, preventing conservatives from their Constitutionally protected right to free speech. The leaders of the Western world have lost their minds.

@shellenberger - Michael Shellenberger

Here is the dictator-thug responsible for this outrageous violation of freedom at the heart of Europe's supposedly liberal democracy. Shame on you @emir_kir ! You are no better than the Nazis and Communists who repressed their political enemies!

@emir_kir - Emir KIR

J'ai pris un arrêté du Bourgmestre pour interdire l'événement "National Conservatism Conference" pour garantir la sécurité publique. A Etterbeek, à Bruxelles Ville et à Saint-Josse, l'extrême-droite n'est pas la bienvenue.

@shellenberger - Michael Shellenberger

THE STORY GETS EVEN CRAZIER!!! The Mayor of the City of Brussels, who just blocked access to a gathering of European conservatives hosted a radical Islamicist Iranian mayor last year! "Tehran mayor Alireza Zakani was placed under sanctions by the UK in 2023 on the grounds that he had been 'involved in the commission of serious human rights violations or abuses in Iran.' He was also reportedly an Iranian paramilitary prior to becoming the capital city's mayor." https://www.express.co.uk/news/politics/1888954/natcon-shut-down-brussels-mayor-iran

Brussels Mayor that tried to force Farage NatCon shut down hosted Iranian mayor Socialist Philippe Close pressured the venue hosting NatCon to shut the event down, but last year he hosted the mayor of the Iranian capital at Brussels' Town Hall. express.co.uk

@shellenberger - Michael Shellenberger

NIGEL FARAGE JUST NOW: "That meeting, over the next two days, you've got the Prime Minister of Hungary; you've got a bishop; you've got members of the European royal families coming; well-known international businessmen and women; politicians; leaders of parties that will win European elections in countries this year in June. "And yet, because they're questioning ever closer union, because they're questioning globalism, they're literally being shut down. "This is like the old Soviet Union. No alternative view allowed. "I tell you what. I might have had my reservations about the way the Conservative government have carried out Brexit. If anything convinced me we did the right thing, it was what happened in that place this morning."

Video Transcript AI Summary

The speaker discusses a meeting where various influential figures, including the prime minister of Hungary, a bishop, and business leaders, are being silenced for questioning globalism and the push for closer union in Europe. The speaker expresses support for Brexit, citing the suppression of differing views at the meeting as confirmation of their decision.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: That meeting, over the next 2 days, you've got the prime minister of Hungary. You've got a bishop. You've got members of the European royal families coming, well known international businessmen and women, politicians, leaders of parties that will win European elections in countries this year in June. And yet because they're questioning ever closer union. Because they're questioning globalism. They're literally being shut down. This is like the old Soviet Union. No alternative view allowed. I'll tell you why. I might have had my reservations about the way the conservative government have carried out Brexit. If anything convinced me that we did the right thing, it was what happened in that place this morning.

@shellenberger - Michael Shellenberger

Bonkers!!!!

@GoodwinMJ - Matt Goodwin

Here is the police presence outside not letting anybody in and if we leave not letting anybody back in! Insane!

@shellenberger - Michael Shellenberger

"There's a police line outside the door. If we leave, we won't be allowed back into the venue." This is a direct violation of "Article 12 - Freedom of assembly and of association" in the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, which is the EU's Bill of Rights. It reads, "1. Everyone has the right to freedom of peaceful assembly and to freedom of association with others." The mayors of Brussels and Brussels City, @PhilippeClose & @emir_kir are breaking the law. They are thugs and should be removed from office.

@GoodwinMJ - Matt Goodwin

Live from the NatCon Brussels Bunker!! #natconbrussels@NatConTalk

Video Transcript AI Summary

Hi, I'm Matt Goodwin reporting from Brussels where an event has been canceled by the left-wing mayor and activists. Attendees are trapped in a room with police outside preventing them from leaving and re-entering. The event was meant for discussions on identity, family, and European politics with elected officials present. This is seen as an attempt to silence democracy. Stay tuned for updates.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: On go. Hi, everybody. Matt Goodwin here. You might have heard that, there is an event in Brussels which effectively has been canceled by the left wing, mayor and his activist allies. I'm in that bunk up in Brussels. I'm gonna show you what it's like if we just pan around and just show you this room. Everybody everybody in this room, effectively, they cannot go anywhere because if we leave, there's a police line outside the door. If we leave, we will not be allowed back into the venue. This is, dogmatic. It's intimidation. It's harassment. All people are doing here is having a conversation about identity, family, the future of European politics. We have elected politicians here. We have Suellen Braberman MP, Miriam Katz MP. We have many European politicians here. But what you're seeing is a concerted effort to try and shut down this discussion. And as you can see, lots of people in the bunker, they're not going anywhere anytime soon. So reporting to you from Brussels, Matt Goodwin. Goodwin. It's an outrage. It's an attempt to shut down the shut down democracy, and I'll keep you updated. Thanks.

@shellenberger - Michael Shellenberger

This is not just "cancel culture" — this is the weaponization of the police in direct violation of Europe's constitution. THIS IS AN ATTACK ON FREE SPEECH AND DEMOCRACY OF ALL FREE PEOPLE ASK YOURSELVES: @JoeBiden @BarackObama @EmmanuelMacron @Bundeskanzler @RishiSunak @alexanderdecroo @vonderleyen Are you all on board with the police preventing your political opponents from being able to speak? If you all do not stop this immediately, you are all implicated in this grotesque attack on freedom of speech, freedom of assembly, and democracy. Every Western leader, including all of the ones above, must take dramatic action to restore freedom and democracy to Belgium, where it is being violated in real time.

@shellenberger - Michael Shellenberger

JOIN SPACES ON THIS URGENT ATTACK ON FREE SPEECH AND DEMOCRACY

@shellenberger - Michael Shellenberger

HERE ARE THE ANTIFA FASCISTS WHO ARE CREATING A POLICE STATE IN BELGIUM "For ten days, activists have been mobilizing to prevent the National Conservatism Conference from taking place in Brussels or in Belgium on April 16 and 17. This will bring together around forty personalities from the European and international extreme right such as Viktor Orbán, Eric Zemmour, Nigel Farage and Tom Vandendriessche. For us, anti-fascist collectives, those fighting the extreme right, feminists, political youth and trade unionists, this conference cannot take place!" https://liege-antifascisme-be.translate.goog/les-extremes-droites-internationales-rassemblees-a-bruxelles-cest-non/?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en

Les extrêmes droites internationales rassemblées à Bruxelles, c’est non! – Front Antifasciste Liege 2.0 liege-antifascisme-be.translate.goog

@shellenberger - Michael Shellenberger

Here's my interview with @yhazony @NatConTalk https://t.co/QsLiyjkYER

@shellenberger - Michael Shellenberger

Please listen to the chairman of the National Conservatism @NatConTalk conference @yhazony describe the outrageous and illegal police crackdown on his meeting happening right now in Belgium, Brussels.

@BGatesIsaPyscho — Concerned Citizen

Posted - August 11, 2024 at 7:39 AM

Saved - August 11, 2024 at 2:21 PM

@BGatesIsaPyscho - Concerned Citizen

🇬🇧 Woman in Newcastle allegedly arrested for holding a sign peacefully in public saying:- ‘Fight The Government Not Each Other’ Britain is the New North Korea https://t.co/9mupnNc52r

@PeterSweden7 — PeterSweden

Posted - August 11, 2024 at 3:15 PM

Saved - August 11, 2024 at 10:36 PM

@PeterSweden7 - PeterSweden

WATCH! British police are now interrogating women for the crime of silently praying in her head while on the street. Literal thought crime. They gave her a penalty notice. SHARE - This is tyranny 👇 https://t.co/JuTZomoHOx

Video Transcript AI Summary

I am not protesting, but praying for those affected by abortion. I am aware of the public order protection order and have been arrested before. I do not believe I am breaching the order. I will not move outside the exclusion zone as I have already been to court over this. Despite my explanation, a fixed penalty notice is issued for alleged protesting, which I deny.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Are you protesting? No. Are you here to crave the lives of unborn children? Speaker 1: As I've mentioned to one of your colleagues before, I think that's a little bit of a leading question. No. I'm not, actually, today. Speaker 0: Can your actions be carried out elsewhere? Speaker 1: I'm I'm not doing any actions. I'm I'm just simply thinking silently in my head. Speaker 0: Okay. And why is it chosen this location, miss Anne? Speaker 1: This is an abortion center. I'm frank for those who've been hurt by abortion. Speaker 0: So as I said before, you're here to pray for the mice and then Speaker 1: Yes. So yeah. I said no. I said no. I'm praying for those who've been hurt by abortion. By Yes. That's right. Okay. Speaker 0: Are you aware there's, a public spray protection order in place here? Speaker 1: Yes. I don't know if you know, but I have actually been arrested twice. I've gone to court and been acquitted for, allegedly my silent that situation at all. Speaker 0: Is it a collision area? Speaker 1: Yes. That's right. That's why I was arrested previously. So, yes, I'm very much aware there's a PSPO in place. Speaker 0: And are you aware that you're breaching the public order protection order in place? Speaker 1: I'm not breaching it. No. Speaker 0: Would you move from here to outside of the exclusion zone? Speaker 1: I don't see any reason why I would need to do that for the reasons I've just explained to you. Speaker 0: Okay. So if not, why are you not willing to move outside the exclusion zone? Speaker 1: Because of what I've just said. Because I don't think I need to move outside the exclusion zone. I've been to court over this. Speaker 0: Okay. Okay. So what we're gonna do is we're gonna issue a fixed penalty notice now. Speaker 1: So what am I being in issued a 6 penalty notice for? Speaker 0: Because I believe and my colleagues believe that you're here to to protest. I just Speaker 1: told you I'm not protesting. I'm simply silently crying.

@BGatesIsaPyscho — Concerned Citizen

Posted - August 11, 2024 at 8:13 PM

Saved - August 11, 2024 at 10:30 PM

@BGatesIsaPyscho - Concerned Citizen

The UK police have never spoken like this before. It’s like they’re trying to antagonise tens of millions of peaceful sensible Brits who simply want a conversation. https://t.co/TNRgSpG1Da

Video Transcript AI Summary

We have evidence of those involved in recent disorder and are actively pursuing them. We will not stop until we find you, whether it takes days or months. Our law enforcement teams are well-equipped to handle the situation, with 8 PSUs in Merseyside alone. Despite some officers getting injured, we have enough resources to manage the situation effectively.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: What I would say to those people who think they've got away with being involved in the disorder on Tuesday or on Saturday, you absolutely haven't got away with it. We are coming for you. We've got hours of social media footage. We've got hours of CCTV footage. I've got offices working round the clock to identify who you are, where you live, where you work. We are coming for you. We'll be coming you for the next few days. We'll be coming for you the next few months. So you might get to next week. You might be sitting with a cup of tea thinking, phew. I've got away with it. Please let me reassure you. You haven't got away with it. We are coming for you. You will feel the full force of the law. And we absolutely want to reassure the communities that we are absolutely able to cope with what's going on. We have got 8 PSUs, here in Merseyside today. So what do I mean by a PSU? Each PSU has 1 inspector, 3 sergeants, and 21 officers. That gives you the scale of the number of offices that we've got a here able to respond, being supported by colleagues across the from across the across the northwest. So, yes, we are equipped. It are the, offices who are getting injured having an impact? Yes. It is. But we absolutely have sufficient resources to to cope.

@JohnStossel — John Stossel

Posted - September 7, 2024 at 2:14 PM

Saved - September 7, 2024 at 10:18 PM

@JohnStossel - John Stossel

A new law in Scotland threatens you with seven years in JAIL if you misgender someone. GLAD @jk_rowling calls this a threat to free speech. Here is how she protested: https://t.co/hIbZby4OVX

Video Transcript AI Summary

The chant "from the river to the sea" is considered by some as a call for genocide and the end of Israel. A proposed bill aims to make saying it illegal discrimination at universities. Most countries have hate speech laws, and Canada may imprison people for life for advocating genocide. Some view misgendering a transgender person as a hate crime, punishable by jail time in places like Scotland, but only if deemed threatening or abusive. JK Rowling intentionally broke Scotland's misgendering law and dared police to arrest her, but they did not. In Britain, people have been arrested for criticizing marginalized groups, such as retweeting an image of progress pride flags forming a swastika. Some argue that policing speech increases hate, while others support rules against hate speech. Ezra Levant was prosecuted in Canada for a book critical of Justin Trudeau. Levant argues that free speech is a safety valve that prevents violence and terrorism. He believes that countries restricting speech may see an increase in violent terrorism.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Many people say that chant is a call for genocide. Speaker 1: Erasing the state of Israel. It's a call for the end of the world's only Jewish state and its people. Speaker 0: If they are advocating genocide, should that chant then be illegal? The first amendment says congress shall make no law abridging freedom of speech, but there are exceptions. Laws forbid speech that incites imminent lawless action. Now Democrats and Republicans in the house have approved a bill making saying, from the river to the sea, illegal discrimination at universities. If it becomes law, that would be something new for America. Here, even hateful speech has been legal. That's not true with most of the rest of the world. Most countries now have laws against what they call hate speech. And Canada is about to pass a law that would imprison people for life if they advocate genocide. Speaker 2: We stand with the Palestinian resistance under heroic and breathe action on October 7th. Speaker 1: Who's gonna be the determinant determiner of who's gonna be prosecuted? Speaker 0: Canadian Ezra Levant, founder of the media outlet Rebel News, fights for free speech. Life in prison for saying the wrong thing. Speaker 1: I'm worried about a law like that that gives a politician the chance to criminalize his peaceful opponent. Speaker 0: Some countries criminalize their opponents now. A Brazilian judge recently ordered Twitter to block popular accounts that support the former Brazilian president. Speaker 1: This crusading judge says take the accounts down. I'm not gonna tell you why. Speaker 0: Elon Musk said no. We will lose revenue, but principles matter more. He called the judge Brazil's Darth Vader, and he does resemble Vader. Speaker 2: You believe misgendering a transgender person is a hate crime. Why? Speaker 0: Scotland recently banned misgendering. Speaker 2: Well, gender is a protected characteristic just as much as race. Speaker 0: Calling her a man could get you 7 years in jail. The politician who pushed the law says, don't worry. Speaker 2: Unless your behavior is threatening or abusive and intends to start a hatred, then you have nothing to worry about. Speaker 0: Nothing to worry about unless a reasonable person views the speech as insulting and likely to result in hatred. Speaker 1: Do you have any idea how serious this is? Speaker 0: Harry Potter's creator sees the problem. Speaker 2: JK Rowling says Scotland's new anti hate crime law is a threat to free speech. Speaker 0: She wrote, if the accurate description of biological sex is deemed criminal, freedom of speech and belief are at an end. This made her enemies slit her throat, says one. Speaker 2: JK Rowling, not a good person. Speaker 0: But Rowling won't back down. The day Scotland's new law took effect, she intentionally broke it by misgendering some trans people on Twitter. She said, these aren't women, but men. I look forward to being arrested. Speaker 1: JK Rowling has the wealth to fight a strong defense. She said, anyone who's charged under this, I'm gonna repeat their words. Let them come after me. Speaker 0: Scottish police chose not to. Speaker 2: If you seek the removal of freedoms from an opponent simply on the grounds that they have offended you, you have crossed a line to stand alongside tyrants. Speaker 1: She and Elon Musk are the 2 people in the world who have done more to stop cancel culture. Speaker 0: In Britain, police enforce cancel culture. Police there arrest people who criticize so called marginalized groups. Speaker 2: Remind me again why I'm being arrested. Speaker 0: This man was arrested just for retweeting this image. Four progress pride flags put together so they form a swastika. He wasn't supporting Nazis, just arguing that the woke movement is totalitarian. Speaker 2: You should not be doing this to me. I expect my freedom of speech. Speaker 1: They handcuffed him. Why did they handcuff him? Was he some physical menace? I don't think you're reducing the hate when you police it in that way. Speaker 0: But polls show. Most people say, yeah, we should have rules against spreading hate. Speaker 1: But every once in a while, the ability to speak the truth is a more pressing value. Even if we're gonna hurt a feeling, even if we're gonna upset the apple cart. That's what freedom of speech means. It means it trumps those other values. Speaker 0: Canada's laws now give politicians power over people's speech. LeVanc's been charged multiple times. Speaker 1: I wrote a book about Justin Trudeau, a knockoff of The Sopranos. I called it the libranos because he's with the liberal party. Oh, he hated that book. He hated the cover art, which looked like he was a mafioso. And so I was prosecuted. What was your marketing plan? Speaker 0: LeVanc was called before investigators working for Elections Canada. Speaker 2: Was it political advertising? Speaker 0: Canada has laws against unregistered political ads. But LeVitt asked the investigators. Speaker 1: Is anyone in your office investigating any other books about Justin Trudeau or just the book that's critical of them? They convicted me. They fined me. 5 years later, I'm still in court over a book that criticized Justin Trudeau. Speaker 0: Organizations like yours continue to spread misinformation and disinformation. Now Trudeau was pushing that law, imposing life in prison for hate speech. Canadians must like this. He gets reelected. Speaker 1: A lot of Canadians and Americans and Brits want Speaker 0: the a net nanny, but for the other guy. It's important that everyone have free speech. Speaker 1: Give people that peaceful outlet for their grievance. You need that, in case of fire, break glass, freedom of speech when there's a crisis, when you just need to speak the truth. If you cork them up, if you don't let them have the safety valve of free speech, they'll explode in another way, possibly including violence. I think there's a correlation between the countries that have the least freedom of speech and countries that have violent terrorism. Free speech is a preventive mechanism that prevents an escalation of problems. Speaker 0: Canada's punishing certain speech with life in prison will discourage some from speaking their truth. Speaker 1: We're a lab laboratory of bad ideas. Speaker 0: It's good that so far, our American police, when they make arrests, say the arrests are for trespassing or property damage, not speech. I don't agree with what these people say, but I'll defend everyone's right to say it.

@BGatesIsaPyscho — Concerned Citizen

Posted - September 11, 2024 at 8:18 AM

Saved - September 11, 2024 at 11:57 AM

@BGatesIsaPyscho - Concerned Citizen

🇬🇧 More unsolicited unwarranted Policing “I noticed you were following me - is there any reason” “Am I being detained?” This man clearly knows his common law - you should too. https://t.co/B8v33dZOUD

@BillboardChris — Billboard Chris 🇨🇦🇺🇸

Posted - October 16, 2024 at 1:11 PM

Saved - October 16, 2024 at 1:57 PM

@BillboardChris - Billboard Chris 🇨🇦🇺🇸

BREAKING: British Army veteran Adam Smith-Connor has just been found GUILTY of praying silently. He was praying for his dead son, out of the way, by a tree on a public green across the street from an abortion facility. This is the first conviction for a thought crime in the UK.

@BillboardChris - Billboard Chris 🇨🇦🇺🇸

UK police charged a man with a crime … of silently praying. Adam Smith-Connor was standing quietly on a public green across the street from an abortion facility. He was 50 - 75 meters away, stood by a tree to be out of its line of sight, and even had his back turned to the clinic, to avoid any impression of approaching or engaging with women using the facility. Police: “We just wanted to come over and say hello, but also just to inquire as to your activities for today.” Adam: “Well, I’m praying.” He had been there for 3 minutes. Police: “In terms of that, can I ask what is the nature of your prayer today?” Adam: “I’m praying for my son, who is deceased.” Police: “I’m sorry for your loss, but ultimately I have to go along with the guidelines of the Public Space Protection Order, to say that we are in the belief that you are in breach of the clause 4A, which says about prayer and also acts of disapproval around the activities at the clinic.” Adam: “I’m just standing praying.” For his silent prayer, Adam has been through two years of legal proceedings and just finished three days of trial. If he is found guilty, he will have a criminal record. Local authorities have spent over £90k of taxpayer money prosecuting him. The UK has truly become a dystopia.

Video Transcript AI Summary

Speaker 0 informs Speaker 1 that they are in an area governed by a Public Space Protection Order, also called a safe zone, where certain activities are not permitted. Speaker 1 states they are praying for their deceased son. Speaker 0 says they must advise Speaker 1 that they are believed to be in breach of the ruling regarding prayer and acts of disapproval. Speaker 1 says they are just standing and praying. Speaker 0 acknowledges this but states the PSPO is in place for a reason and must be followed.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: We just wanted to sort of come over to see the person's picture. Cool. Also just invite you to go to your activities for today. Speaker 1: Well, I'm praying. Speaker 0: Just for your awareness, you are in an area which is governed by a public space protection provider. I Speaker 1: am aware. I am aware. Speaker 0: That public space protection address. They also call it a safe zone. There are signs located in the area, just to make you aware of that and the area where certain activities are Speaker 1: permitted. Yeah. Speaker 0: In terms Speaker 1: What is the nature of that? I'm praying to my son. Speaker 0: I I don't want to Speaker 1: pray, but I don't want to Speaker 0: sort of, Speaker 1: Sure. Right. Well, I'm I'm praying for my son who's deceased. To go and see that. Okay. Speaker 0: So, again, I'm sorry for your loss, but ultimately, I have to go and advise Speaker 1: the police detection order. Right. Speaker 0: Let's say that we are in the belief, therefore, that you are in breach of what the ruling that says about prayer and also acts of disapproval. Speaker 1: And activities of the There's I'm I'm just standing praying. Speaker 0: I understand that. But the PSBO is in place for a reason. We do have to follow through on those people.

@WallStreetApes — Wall Street Apes

Posted - November 1, 2024 at 3:51 PM

Saved - November 1, 2024 at 5:57 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

I witnessed an unbelievable situation during early voting in Illinois. A woman called the police on a man holding a sign stating that it's illegal for non-citizens to vote. Surprisingly, the police sided with her and insisted on filing a report. The man clarified he was at a proper distance from the polling place, adhering to electioneering laws. It escalated to the point where a sergeant had to explain that he wasn't violating any laws due to his distance from the polling station. It's shocking how this situation unfolded.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

UNBELIEVABLE 🚨 Early Voting Illinois Woman calls the police on a man near a polling place with a sign that says “If you are NOT a citizen of the United States of America, it is ILLEGAL for you to vote.” The police SIDE WITH THE WOMAN WHO CALLED “We have to have a police report filed on us? That sounds that sounds kind of extreme.” I guess you can’t even tell illegals they can’t vote in America anymore… He makes it clear he was the proper distance away from the polling place to not violate electioneering laws They even have to get a Sargent involved to explain they are not violating and election laws because of the distance away from the polling station they are

Video Transcript AI Summary

An allegation was made, prompting a report. The individuals questioned expressed confusion over the need for a police report, asserting they hadn't broken any laws while distributing materials. They highlighted the potential for numerous reports if every triggered voter reacted similarly. They emphasized their status as law-abiding citizens and requested clarification. After discussions with security, it was confirmed that they were in compliance and that no report would be filed. The officers acknowledged the situation and expressed understanding, reassuring them that they were not doing anything wrong. The individuals appreciated the officers' assistance and understanding before parting ways.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Because an allegation is made, we have to make a report on it. So do you guys have ID on you? I'm not gonna have a police report filed on me for we're not beyond the electioneering line. We didn't do anything wrong because the lady was triggered by a sign. We have to have a police report filed on us? That sounds that sounds kind of extreme. It's a voter thing. Right. A voter thing. So what's the law that was broken? Harassment, voting There's no harassment. I know, but we'll have to do a report for the state Imagine every democrat voter that pulls up here and gets triggered by us handing out republican stuff. There's gonna be 17 police reports on us today. Unfortunately. We're not even talking to these people. You just I really would rather not have my name put on a police report for I mean, we're Right. Law abiding citizens here. We're not doing absolutely anything wrong at all for people. Can we talk to my surgeon real quick? Okay. Thank you. It's just it's it seems that the other side is very triggered by, this side. So just stay. No one called and complained to the election judge upstairs, but you guys are good. There's no no report. Nothing's gonna happen. Alright. Appreciate it. Whoever saw this, obviously, misinterpreted whatever Right. Was there. Right. Security, I talked to them. They said where you guys are. You're perfect. Yep. Not doing anything wrong. No. Thank you, guys. I'm sorry to get you taken care of. I appreciate it. Accusing you of something. That's okay. That's okay. I appreciate the power of law. You got a call and you have to investigate it. So Alrighty. Appreciate it, guys. Thank you, guys. Have a good day.

@scotfamparty — ScottishFamilyParty

Posted - February 19, 2025 at 7:23 PM

Saved - February 21, 2025 at 11:14 AM

@scotfamparty - ScottishFamilyParty

First buffer zone arrest in Scotland. TODAY. Lady led away in handcuffs. Here you are, @JDVance The law in action. PLEASE SHARE WIDELY. People need to understand the nation we are living in. https://t.co/fPtNOHfyey

Video Transcript AI Summary

I'm Rose Docherty outside the Queen Elizabeth Hospital in Glasgow. You've been cautioned, and you'll be reported from the street, but if you refuse to leave, you will be arrested. For years, we've been told about intimidation and harassment, but this law prevents those who are trying to save the lives of the unborn. Only one member of Scottish Parliament voted against this buffer zone law, John Mason. Kate Forbes, you voted for this, but it's never too late to apologize. Where is the reformed party on pro-life issues? Nowhere to be seen. This law is appalling, and it's sobering to witness. Can you really believe that voting for parties that implement this is the way forward? The time for delusion is over. Vote and stand up for what you believe in, and join the Scottish Family Party via the link below.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: This is Rose Docherty standing outside the Queen Elizabeth Hospital in Glasgow this afternoon. Let's see what happens next. Speaker 1: Charge you. I'm gonna charge you, but before I do so, I'm gonna caution you. You're not obliged to say anything. Anything you do say will be noted that you may be using evidence. The offense is, now in this day and day, we've been we've always had from a protest, That's fine. What will happen just now is I'm not gonna take you back to the station, you will be reported from the street. I will ask you to leave this area now. If you refuse to do so, you will be arrested for refusing to be suspended. You will be taken to the station. Okay. Thank you. Of Speaker 0: course, for years, we've been fed the narrative of intimidation, harassment, molestation, people preventing people from accessing so called health care. But what we see here is the simple reality of this law in action, preventing exactly what it's supposed to prevent. Now the target of this law is influence. So this is why the law is so evil. It's trying to prevent influence. They're just trying to prevent people who are trying to save lives. People who are trying to save the lives of the unborn. That's what the law is intended to stop. And this law, this buffer zone law, only one member of the Scottish Parliament voted against it. That was John Mason. So Kate Forbes, for example, you voted for this persecution of your fellow Christians, but it's it's never too late. I mean, you could apologize. You could say that you wish you'd never done that, and I think that would be a really positive step if you were able to do that. Some people at the moment seem to get the reformed party is the answer to all our problems. Where's the reformed party No. Offers them on a pro life issues in general? Well, the answer generally is nowhere to be seen. So mister president, mister vice president, JD Vance, we're talking about this law a few days ago, and here it is manifest in action. And it is absolutely appalling as I'm sure you will agree. I was pretty sobering watching that, isn't it? I find it quite sobering being there filming this this afternoon and I would urge you to be able to watch this video again. Watch Rose being handcuffed and led away by the police again. And then surely the question I would like to ask everyone is can you really still believe that the way forward is to vote for parties that will implement this illegal, then somehow or other by some strange mysterious process, they're gonna get elected and good is gonna come from it. Really, really, the time for this delusion is over. It's time to vote for what you believe in, stand up for what you believe in, and a good first step for that would very well be to join the Scottish Family Party. We'd very much appreciate your support. So do join us via the link below. Thanks.

@LoisMcLatch — Lois McLatchie Miller

Posted - February 20, 2025 at 12:01 AM

Saved - February 20, 2025 at 5:41 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

I shared a breaking news update about Rose Docherty, a 74-year-old woman arrested under Scotland's "buffer zone" law for holding a sign that invited conversation. This incident occurred shortly after VP Vance criticized the Scottish government for its strict regulations. I also expressed my concern about the treatment of Christians in Scotland, feeling that we are marginalized and criminalized for our beliefs, likening our status to that of "heretics" in a society dominated by a different ideology.

@LoisMcLatch - Lois McLatchie Miller

🚨BREAKING: WATCH - a 74-year-old woman has been ARRESTED under Scotland's draconian "buffer zone" law🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 Rose Docherty held a sign reading "coercion is a crime, here to talk, if you want" Police state their belief she is conducting an illegal "silent vigil":

@LoisMcLatch - Lois McLatchie Miller

This is what Rose was arrested for. Standing. With a sign. Inviting anyone who wants to talk, to do so. DAYS after VP Vance called out the Scottish gov for their draconian law. https://t.co/1XZbctRjjQ

@LoisMcLatch - Lois McLatchie Miller

https://t.co/xSyKzeHZPY

@LoisMcLatch - Lois McLatchie Miller

As a Scot, I can tell you this is 100% true 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 In Scotland, Christians have become an underclass - bullied, discriminated against, and criminalised for their faith. We are treated as “heretics” against the dominant “Church of Woke”. https://t.co/oo6c9O3EXM

Video Transcript AI Summary

Just a few months ago, in October, the Scottish government started sending letters to residents within designated "safe access zones." These letters cautioned that even private prayer inside their own homes could be construed as a violation of the law. The government encouraged people to report anyone suspected of engaging in such "thought crimes". I'm concerned that free speech is diminishing in Britain and throughout Europe.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: This last October, just a few months ago, the Scottish government began distributing letters to citizens whose houses lay within so called safe access zones, warning them that even private prayer within their own homes may amount to breaking the law. Naturally, the government urged readers to report any fellow citizens suspected guilty of thought crime. In Britain and across Europe, free speech, I fear, is in retreat.

@PeterSweden7 — PeterSweden

Posted - March 27, 2025 at 9:29 AM

Saved - March 27, 2025 at 11:55 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

I’m shocked to hear that people in Scotland are getting letters warning them that praying in their own homes could be illegal if they live within 200 meters of an abortion clinic. This feels like a serious infringement on freedom of religion and speech. What is happening?

@PeterSweden7 - PeterSweden

WHAT'S GOING ON??? People in Scotland have been receiving letters that they could break the law if they pray in their own house. I'm not making this up. This is literal Soviet behavior. If their house is within 200 meters of an ab*rtion clinic and if they pray inside their own house, it could be illegal. What is going on over there? Freedom of religion and free speech is under attack in Europe.

@dave24144975 — 'Seeing is believing'

Posted - April 2, 2025 at 6:24 PM

Saved - April 3, 2025 at 11:42 AM

@dave24144975 - 'Seeing is believing'

🇬🇧The UK turned upside down... A Christian man is hounded and prosecuted for silent prayer, while others do what they want and the authorities turn a blind eye... https://t.co/rVUDxx5CxD

Video Transcript AI Summary

Adam Smith Connor was criminally convicted and faces bankruptcy for praying outside an abortion clinic. On 10/08/2023, people outside the Israeli embassy in London prayed towards Mecca, but faced no consequences. Connor, a Christian, was convicted for praying, allegedly even silently. Richard Williams in Wales was sentenced to three months for a derogatory Facebook post. In 2021, a car convoy in North London shouted antisemitic slurs, but no punishment was given.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Fellow called Adam Smith Connor, who was criminally convicted for praying outside an abortion clinic. It's cost him thousands in legal fees and probably will bankrupt him, and he's been criminally convicted. For praying? For praying outside an abortion clinic. Technically, in parts of the country, is illegal to pray. However, on 10/08/2023, outside the Israel embassy in Kensington in London, swarms of people went to the embassy. They were not just celebrating. They were not just chanting Allah Akbar. They were on their knees facing Mecca, praying thanks. Those people were not sentenced. But the Christian guy who was praying Christian guy praying inside his head, he has been criminally convicted. This is two tier system. Richard Williams in Wales sentenced to three months in prison for a derogatory Facebook post. In 2021, an entourage of cars driving around London shouting, f the Jews, f their mothers, raped their daughters on megaphones going around the Jewish part of North London. Nothing. No punish

@OliLondonTV — Oli London

Posted - April 14, 2025 at 11:01 AM

Saved - April 14, 2025 at 2:07 PM

@OliLondonTV - Oli London

British police threaten to arrest man for preaching the Bible outside Buckingham Palace. “I’m allowed to preach. Everywhere I go I’m allowed to preach. https://t.co/HYy7DyQ3Kc

Video Transcript AI Summary

Speaker 0 asks what offense they committed, stating they were grabbed. Speaker 1 says they can talk, and Speaker 0 accuses them of being sarcastic. Speaker 0 says Speaker 1 will be judged and urges them to repent and believe in the gospel, because even the police will bow to the Lord. Speaker 1 attempts to return to the topic of the arrest, but Speaker 0 wants to continue preaching. Speaker 0 states they are allowed to preach everywhere.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: So what offence have I done? You was grabbing me. What offence have I done? Okay. Can I tell you? Speaker 1: Yeah. You can talk. Oh, thank you. That's so kind. Speaker 0: You don't have to be sarcastic. Speaker 1: You'll be Speaker 0: judged on the day of judgement. Oh, the Lord and savior Jesus Christ. Alright. I leave. If I was you, I'd repent on my sins and believe in the gospel because the police will bow to the Lord as well. Speaker 1: Let's get back to the arresting part. Speaker 0: Let's get back to the preaching the gospel part. Hallelujah. I ain't got amplification. Hallelujah. I'm allowed to preach. I'm allowed to preach. Everywhere I go, I'm allowed to preach,

@LongTimeHistory — LongTime🤓FirstTime👨‍💻

Posted - June 13, 2025 at 4:19 PM

Saved - June 14, 2025 at 4:17 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

I witnessed a troubling incident in Las Vegas where police arrested protesters for expressing their opinions about ICE, claiming their comments were offensive. Officers aggressively intervened without warning, which raised concerns about free speech. A local attorney emphasized the importance of exercising First Amendment rights peacefully, encouraging everyone to voice their views through words, signs, and chants, regardless of their stance on the issue.

@LongTimeHistory - LongTime🤓FirstTime👨‍💻

Las Vegas police arrest ICE protesters—for hurting their feelings saying, "Honor your oath." Police yell, "This isn't F-ing L.A." while handcuffing the woman. "Go back to L.A." No warning given before dozen officers rushed them—for making rude comments and "putting a camera in my face"—neither of which is against the law. #DemVoice1 #wtpBLUE #DemsUnited

Video Transcript AI Summary

The speaker demands someone "honor your oath," then claims they "didn't do nothing" and "didn't say nothing." The speaker questions why others didn't react to something they heard, while the speaker has been "covering for your guys' side" and advocating for peace. They mention protecting a "new street guy" and again emphasize keeping things peaceful. The speaker states they are going to bring "her" over and tells someone to "enjoy your night." The speaker then references "the last two pages online" and says someone needs to end the video.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Enjoying yourself? You know, covering everything? Nothing better to do? Honor your oath. How about honor your oath, bitch? How about that? Honor your oath. Oh, here we go. I didn't do nothing. I didn't say nothing. Are you serious? I don't hear that? Everybody heard it. Why didn't they run around and check up their heads now? But I did. I've been walking around covering for your guys' side. I've been saying keep it peaceful. They've been trying to protect the new street guy, and they're saying keep it peaceful. You can watch Well, we're gonna actually bring her over here. Okay? We're gonna bring her over here. Enjoy your night. What? The last two pages online. Someone needs to end the video.

@LongTimeHistory - LongTime🤓FirstTime👨‍💻

Local news coverage of protesters' First Amendment rights at ICE protests in Las Vegas. “I don’t care if you’re pro-ICE or anti-ICE. Go out there and do it,” explained First Amendment attorney. “But do it with your words, do it with signs, do it with chants, if you like.” https://t.co/3WvdAqf2nk

Video Transcript AI Summary

First Amendment attorney Mark Randazza says the First Amendment protects the right to protest by standing on the sidewalk, chanting, and holding signs, but it does not protect protesters from crimes committed while protesting. Randazza believes Metro Police acted correctly when arresting protesters for throwing rocks and blocking roads. He stated that declaring a protest unlawful to clear the streets is acceptable once protesters block roads. According to Randazza, a First Amendment violation occurs when police arrest protesters acting lawfully, which he claims is rare in Las Vegas, citing a history of tolerance for free speech. He supports all protests, regardless of the message, but says protesters should use words and signs, not block traffic. Randazza advises protesters to be arrested if necessary, invoke the amendment, remain silent, and contact a First Amendment lawyer. Metro Police made nearly 100 arrests and cited seven minors.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Eight news now reporter Ryan Tizmeneski spoke with the first amendment attorney about the incident and joins us live in studio with more. Ryan? Speaker 1: Kirsten, the attorney I talked with is a strong defender of the amendment's right to protest regardless of the message. With last night's protest ending in nearly 100 arrests, I asked him what's the boundary between exercising your rights and breaking the law? Mark Randazza says the amendment protects your freedom to stand on the sidewalk, chant, and hold signs, but it does not make you innocent from crimes committed while doing so. Speaker 2: If you're doing something that would be illegal if you weren't protesting, it doesn't magically become legal because you are protester. Speaker 1: When it comes to what happened Wednesday night, he says Metro Police made the right call after protesters began to throw rocks and block roads. Speaker 2: Once a protest descends to people blocking the roads, If the police wanna declare it unlawful to clear the streets, you know, even as a staunch Amendment advocate, that does not rub me the wrong way. Speaker 1: Randazza says a Amendment violation happens when police arrest protesters who are acting lawfully, and he hasn't seen many violations in Las Vegas. Speaker 2: Metro is pretty good with that. There there's a history in Las Vegas of tolerance for free speech activities. Speaker 1: Randazza supports protests regardless of the message. Speaker 2: I don't care if you're pro ICE or anti ICE. Go out there and do it. But do it with your words. Do it with signs. Do it with, you know, chance if you like. But the moment you start to block traffic, I hope somebody runs you over. I don't have a problem with that. Speaker 1: Randazza tells me if police are going to arrest you at a protest, let it happen and consider using the amendment and not telling them anything. And contact a first amendment lawyer. Kirsten? Speaker 0: Thank you, Ryan. In addition to the nearly 100 arrests, Metro Police also cited seven minor.

@chrisdacey — Dacey Media

Posted - July 5, 2025 at 8:40 PM

Saved - July 6, 2025 at 6:29 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

I witnessed a troubling incident in Ottawa where the police seemed to prioritize the demands of a large anti-Israel group while targeting a small woman filming from the sidewalk. The officers arrested Christine and threatened us both with arrest for simply being present. Their behavior suggested they were following specific orders, and I’m left questioning what those orders are and who is behind them. The contrast in how the police handled the situation raises serious concerns about their approach to policing in this context.

@chrisdacey - Dacey Media

TWO-TIER POLICING IN OTTAWA Two cameras are "disturbing the peace" of the giant drum banging, hate-chanting, anti-Israel mob?!? OPS grab C², telling her she's under arrest. Then an officer threatens us both with arrest if we don't leave the area. Listen to the way he talks to me, his story changes. He lies and outright accuses me of things that never happened. At times, it's obvious these officers are taking the path of least resistance, but it's also quite obvious to me that they are under very specific orders. I would like to know what those standing orders are and who is giving them!

Video Transcript AI Summary

A person states they are not a danger and claims someone is being attacked by a crowd and arrested. They allege authorities are ignoring assaults against Christine, threatening to arrest her, and fabricating conditions while the crowd acts with impunity. The person says they have paperwork and knows her conditions. They state she will be out with them soon and that the authorities are causing a disturbance with a social protest. They ask that nothing happens to the crowd and offer to just talk, saying they don't need to protest.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: The fuck's So she gets attacked by the crowd, and she's arrested? I'm back. I'm way back. Worry about the mob, not me. I'm not a danger. You know it. With danger. No. It's not. And I got the paperwork at Now they're pretending that she has a condition she doesn't. So police here ignoring assaults against Christine, now threatening to arrest her, making up conditions As the crowd celebrate, the crowd acts with impunity and violence. So you know her conditions? Yes. Okay. Give them to me. Not tight. Not tight. She's gonna be out with me before and you guys are causing to disturb. Okay. With the social protest. Okay? And we're all videotaping too. Yes. I'm asking you as a favor. Nothing happens to them. I'll do it just talking. I do need you to protest at all. Okay. I get that. Let's go. Okay?

@chrisdacey - Dacey Media

This is part of what led up to the above video https://t.co/9cYMOiQrgy

@chrisdacey - Dacey Media

"The path of least resistance" Ottawa Police continue their two-tier policing approach, ignoring threats and intimidation from a large anti-Israel mob and target a small woman filming from the sidewalk. Soon after this OPS grab Christine and drag her off the street telling her she's under arrest. An OPS officer threatened us both with arrest if we did not leave the area, that video coming soon.

Video Transcript AI Summary

A person filming on the sidewalk is eyeballed by a drummer, who approaches her until a police officer intervenes. The same drummer then approaches another person filming, and Will slows him down. The drummer hits an officer with a drumstick. Someone yells that the person filming is violating rights by being there. Another person says the police are ignoring the people after her. Someone helps the person filming get away. Another person asks if there are any conditions. Someone states that the law should apply to the people who came at them and hit an officer with a drumstick. Someone else says to get the terrorists off the street that are violating. Another person states that two people with cameras are not the problem.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Bottom left of your screen, you can see Christine on the sidewalk filming, not engaging. Watch the big guy with the drum. Starts eyeballing her coming at her. Police officer has to get involved. This guy Speaker 1: will continue doing everything, and he will eventually come back. Speaker 0: Here's the same guy now coming at me. Christine filming him. Will gets in his way. That slows him down a little bit, and then he's gonna hit this officer with his drumstick. Speaker 2: You're hitting Speaker 1: a cop with that kid. Speaker 2: Good job. Good job. Is behind me. Yo. Step Richard. Get up. I'm violating my right. I'm allowed to be here. Speaker 1: You should be worried about the violent crowd. All these police after her, ignoring the people after her. Christine. Walk, Christine. Walk with me. Speaker 2: Dude, jump. It's absolutely criminal what's going on, girl. Stay away from Let's take the feet. Stand with me. Speaker 1: Get on my other shoulder then. It's fine. Come on. Yes. Be with me. Speaker 2: Keep the peace. Good behavior. Yo. You're checking. Go ahead. Be careful. Speaker 0: Is that a threat? They're attacking her. Speaker 2: She was filming people. Speaker 1: I'm asking if there's any conditions. Speaker 2: Yes. Are you threatening me? Speaker 1: Ed. Do they have any conditions? Do have any conditions? Speaker 0: Did the law apply to them? Because they came at us. They hit this officer with a drumstick Speaker 2: Don't read Speaker 1: that. And you take her out. Speaker 2: Before you open your mouth. Fuck sakes. You're worried about that? Speaker 1: There's a 100 crimes you can worry about. Speaker 2: Get the terrorists off the street that are violating. How come they're allowed to march? With no Speaker 1: Two people with cameras are not the problem. Are you safe?

@Mrgunsngear — Mrgunsngear

Posted - August 13, 2025 at 9:09 PM

Saved - August 13, 2025 at 9:32 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

British police visited my home to warn me about a protest I'm planning to attend. While I responded appropriately, I know these officers would arrest me if ordered. It's concerning how they knew about my plans, suggesting they're monitoring me through signals intelligence. A cop mentioned my "freedom of speech," yet their presence contradicts that claim. In 2023, nearly 13,000 people were arrested in the UK for social media posts, mostly native-born individuals.

@Mrgunsngear - Mrgunsngear

British police go to a man's home to warn him about a protest he plans to attend. Man responds the right way but there's a 100% chance these cops would willingly arrest the man if their bosses told them to. -How do they know he's planning on attending a protest? They're clearly monitoring him via signals intelligence of some sort. -Cop says the man has "freedom of speech" but the presence of the cop proves he doesn't. -In 2023, almost 13k people were arrested for social media posts in the UK and almost all were native born. #UnitedKingdom #PoliceState #cops #england #tyranny #police #twotierbritain #TwoTierJustice

Video Transcript AI Summary

Speaker 1 says Warwickshire have asked me to come around and just basically, it's about this protest tomorrow in Warwickshire. They're aware that you might be wanting to attend that planned protest, and freedom of speech is acknowledged. The request is to drop a leaflet about being involved in a protest. Speaker 0 replies: "Do me a favor. Take it back to him and write back on it to him, say, we will no longer be silent and to fuck himself. From from me, with love. Cheers. Thanks very much." He adds, "With love. With love. Yeah. The solemn majority of Britain will no longer stay silent." and tells to tell them that. "Thank you very much. Have a good day." "Nice one, Ash."

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Hello? Speaker 1: Hello, mate. Are you alright? Speaker 0: Yeah. What's up? Absolutely Speaker 1: nothing, so don't panic. It's just a a very quick one. I appreciate you're at work, but Warwickshire have asked me to come around and just basically, it's a load of ours, mate, but it's about this protest tomorrow in Warwickshire. Speaker 0: Yeah. Speaker 1: And just saying, obviously, that they're aware that you might be wanting to attend that planned protest. And, obviously, that's absolutely fine. You've got freedom of speech, and that's no issues at all. And all they've asked me to do, mate, it sounds dumb, so I apologize, and it's really woeful. It's not something I I agree with, but I've been asked to do it. It's just to drop a leaflet about being involved in a protest. Actually, it sounds bad, but it is what it is. Speaker 0: Do me a favor. Take it back to him and write back on it to him, say, we will no longer be silent and to fuck himself. From from me, with love. Cheers. Thanks very much. With love. With love. Yeah. Cheers, dude. The solemn majority of Britain will no longer stay silent. Tell them that. Thank you very much. Have a good day. Speaker 1: Nice one, Ash.

@BTnewsroom — BreakThrough News

Posted - December 9, 2025 at 1:44 AM

Saved - December 10, 2025 at 2:45 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

At a public hearing on the Oracle/OpenAI data center, Port Washington police dragged me out after I spoke against it. I and two others were charged with disorderly conduct, though I was sitting quietly. "We are not giving up. This struggle is by no means over," I told BT News.

@BTnewsroom - BreakThrough News

Port Washington police officers dragged Christine Le Jeune out of a public hearing for an Oracle and OpenAI data center immediately after she spoke out against it. Le Jeune and two others are being charged with disorderly conduct, despite the fact that she was sitting quietly in her seat at the time of arrest. “We are not giving up. This struggle is by no means over,” Le Jeune told BT News in the days following her arrest.

Video Transcript AI Summary

"Speaker 0" says: "We're gonna go, James. Yes. We're not gonna go to you people. This is so locked up. You know that." They insist, "We'll not continue to be silenced and ignored while while our beautiful pristine city is taken away from us and handed over to a corporation intent on extracting as many resources as they can regardless of the impact to the people who live here."

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: We're gonna go, James. Yes. We're not gonna go to you people. This is so locked up. You know that. Right? We'll not continue to be silenced and ignored while while our beautiful pristine city is taken away from us and handed over to a corporation intent on extracting as many resources as they can regardless of the impact to the people who live here.

@BigBrotherWatch — Big Brother Watch

Posted - December 13, 2025 at 12:00 PM

Saved - December 13, 2025 at 5:31 PM

@BigBrotherWatch - Big Brother Watch

😷People are covering their faces to avoid live facial recognition surveillance. UK police? Grabbing them off the street for not complying & demanding their details. This is not a slippery slope it's a cliff edge. We must #StopFacialRecognition. https://t.co/bxEUeUUg2D

Video Transcript AI Summary

Speaker 0 describes a facial recognition van; a man covered his face to avoid being caught by police cameras. Police stopped him and photographed him anyway. There’s claimed to be no law against covering one’s face, and Speaker 0 says, “you let him go then.” Speaker 1 counters, suggesting it might be because “I don’t consent to being on there,” calling it “government overreach.” Speaker 0 continues: “Don't cover my face. Don't push me over when I'm walking down the street.” The police deemed this disorderly behavior and issued a fine; Speaker 0 shows a £90 fine and notes that “there you go. Look at that.” He asserts that the man has a right to cover his face and can walk away. Speaker 1 adds: “We live in a country which is free. We don’t have to carry ID. So we don’t live in a state where the police have the right to see your ID willy nilly. This takes away my freedom because you're IDing me without asking.”

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Where there's a facial recognition van, you've covered your whole face up like that. This man didn't want to be caught by the police cameras, so he covered his face. Police stopped him. They photographed him anyway. There's no law. There's no law against covering your face. Yeah. Okay. Well, there you go. You let him go then. Speaker 1: Well, maybe it's Speaker 0: To your face? Speaker 1: Maybe it's because I don't consent to being on there. Speaker 0: Alright. Okay. Why is that? Speaker 1: Because I think it's a bit of a government overreach. Speaker 0: Down? Is that alright? Don't cover my face. Don't push me over when I'm walking down the street. The police said this was disorderly behavior, so they gave him a fine. I've got on there a £90 fine. There you go. Look at that. You let them know that he's got a right to cover his face and he can walk away. The Speaker 1: thing is, we we live in a country which is free. We don't have to carry ID. So we don't live in a state where the police have the right to see your ID willy nilly. This takes away my freedom because you're ID ing me without asking.

@JohnStossel — John Stossel

Posted - September 7, 2024 at 2:14 PM

Saved - September 7, 2024 at 7:30 PM

@JohnStossel - John Stossel

A new law in Scotland threatens you with seven years in JAIL if you misgender someone. GLAD @jk_rowling calls this a threat to free speech. Here is how she protested: https://t.co/hIbZby4OVX

Video Transcript AI Summary

Many believe that certain chants call for genocide and advocate for the end of Israel. A proposed bill in the U.S. could make such chants illegal at universities, a significant shift in free speech laws. In contrast, countries like Canada are moving towards stricter hate speech laws, potentially imprisoning individuals for life for advocating genocide. Critics warn that such laws could be misused to silence political opponents. Instances of arrests for speech in the UK highlight the risks of policing expression. Advocates argue that free speech is essential to prevent violence and allow grievances to be aired. The ongoing debate emphasizes the need for a balance between protecting free speech and addressing hate speech, with concerns about the implications of restricting expression.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Many people say that chant is a call for genocide. Speaker 1: Erasing the state of Israel. It's a call for the end of the world's only Jewish state and its people. Speaker 0: If they are advocating genocide, should that chant then be illegal? The first amendment says congress shall make no law abridging freedom of speech, but there are exceptions. Laws forbid speech that incites imminent lawless action. Now Democrats and Republicans in the house have approved a bill making saying, from the river to the sea, illegal discrimination at universities. If it becomes law, that would be something new for America. Here, even hateful speech has been legal. That's not true with most of the rest of the world. Most countries now have laws against what they call hate speech. And Canada is about to pass a law that would imprison people for life if they advocate genocide. Speaker 2: We stand with the Palestinian resistance under heroic and breathe action on October 7th. Speaker 1: Who's gonna be the determinant determiner of who's gonna be prosecuted? Speaker 0: Canadian Ezra Levant, founder of the media outlet Rebel News, fights for free speech. Life in prison for saying the wrong thing. Speaker 1: I'm worried about a law like that that gives a politician the chance to criminalize his peaceful opponent. Speaker 0: Some countries criminalize their opponents now. A Brazilian judge recently ordered Twitter to block popular accounts that support the former Brazilian president. Speaker 1: This crusading judge says take the accounts down. I'm not gonna tell you why. Speaker 0: Elon Musk said no. We will lose revenue, but principles matter more. He called the judge Brazil's Darth Vader, and he does resemble Vader. Speaker 2: You believe misgendering a transgender person is a hate crime. Why? Speaker 0: Scotland recently banned misgendering. Speaker 2: Well, gender is a protected characteristic just as much as race. Speaker 0: Calling her a man could get you 7 years in jail. The politician who pushed the law says, don't worry. Speaker 2: Unless your behavior is threatening or abusive and intends to start a hatred, then you have nothing to worry about. Speaker 0: Nothing to worry about unless a reasonable person views the speech as insulting and likely to result in hatred. Speaker 1: Do you have any idea how serious this is? Speaker 0: Harry Potter's creator sees the problem. Speaker 2: JK Rowling says Scotland's new anti hate crime law is a threat to free speech. Speaker 0: She wrote, if the accurate description of biological sex is deemed criminal, freedom of speech and belief are at an end. This made her enemies slit her throat, says one. Speaker 2: JK Rowling, not a good person. Speaker 0: But Rowling won't back down. The day Scotland's new law took effect, she intentionally broke it by misgendering some trans people on Twitter. She said, these aren't women, but men. I look forward to being arrested. Speaker 1: JK Rowling has the wealth to fight a strong defense. She said, anyone who's charged under this, I'm gonna repeat their words. Let them come after me. Speaker 0: Scottish police chose not to. Speaker 2: If you seek the removal of freedoms from an opponent simply on the grounds that they have offended you, you have crossed a line to stand alongside tyrants. Speaker 1: She and Elon Musk are the 2 people in the world who have done more to stop cancel culture. Speaker 0: In Britain, police enforce cancel culture. Police there arrest people who criticize so called marginalized groups. Speaker 2: Remind me again why I'm being arrested. Speaker 0: This man was arrested just for retweeting this image. Four progress pride flags put together so they form a swastika. He wasn't supporting Nazis, just arguing that the woke movement is totalitarian. Speaker 2: You should not be doing this to me. I expect my freedom of speech. Speaker 1: They handcuffed him. Why did they handcuff him? Was he some physical menace? I don't think you're reducing the hate when you police it in that way. Speaker 0: But polls show. Most people say, yeah, we should have rules against spreading hate. Speaker 1: But every once in a while, the ability to speak the truth is a more pressing value. Even if we're gonna hurt a feeling, even if we're gonna upset the apple cart. That's what freedom of speech means. It means it trumps those other values. Speaker 0: Canada's laws now give politicians power over people's speech. LeVanc's been charged multiple times. Speaker 1: I wrote a book about Justin Trudeau, a knockoff of The Sopranos. I called it the libranos because he's with the liberal party. Oh, he hated that book. He hated the cover art, which looked like he was a mafioso. And so I was prosecuted. What was your marketing plan? Speaker 0: LeVanc was called before investigators working for Elections Canada. Speaker 2: Was it political advertising? Speaker 0: Canada has laws against unregistered political ads. But LeVitt asked the investigators. Speaker 1: Is anyone in your office investigating any other books about Justin Trudeau or just the book that's critical of them? They convicted me. They fined me. 5 years later, I'm still in court over a book that criticized Justin Trudeau. Speaker 0: Organizations like yours continue to spread misinformation and disinformation. Now Trudeau was pushing that law, imposing life in prison for hate speech. Canadians must like this. He gets reelected. Speaker 1: A lot of Canadians and Americans and Brits want Speaker 0: the a net nanny, but for the other guy. It's important that everyone have free speech. Speaker 1: Give people that peaceful outlet for their grievance. You need that, in case of fire, break glass, freedom of speech when there's a crisis, when you just need to speak the truth. If you cork them up, if you don't let them have the safety valve of free speech, they'll explode in another way, possibly including violence. I think there's a correlation between the countries that have the least freedom of speech and countries that have violent terrorism. Free speech is a preventive mechanism that prevents an escalation of problems. Speaker 0: Canada's punishing certain speech with life in prison will discourage some from speaking their truth. Speaker 1: We're a lab laboratory of bad ideas. Speaker 0: It's good that so far, our American police, when they make arrests, say the arrests are for trespassing or property damage, not speech. I don't agree with what these people say, but I'll defend everyone's right to say it.