reSee.it - Related Post Feed
@simonateba - Simon Ateba
BREAKING: Let me try to simplify Biden corruption scheme to the American people, Republican Congressman William @RepTimmons says in EXPLOSIVELY DETAILED remarks. WATCH
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker argues that there is substantial evidence indicating that Hunter Biden engaged in illegal activities and received millions of dollars from foreign nationals. The main question is what Joe Biden knew about his son's actions and when he knew it. The speaker believes that Congress has a duty to investigate whether Joe Biden was complicit in the scheme and financially benefited from it. The speaker outlines a pattern where foreign clients pay the Bidens, and in return, the vice president uses his influence to benefit the clients. The speaker mentions specific instances involving Russian and Kazakhstani individuals. The speaker calls for further investigation and subpoenas for documents to determine Joe Biden's involvement. The speaker criticizes the Department of Justice, FBI, and IRS for not taking action and accuses them of concealing possible crimes. The speaker concludes by suggesting that if evidence shows Joe Biden took half of Hunter Biden's income, Democrats should put politics aside and join in impeaching a corrupt president.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Try to simplify this for the American people. My colleagues across the aisle alleged that this inquiry is improper and that this hearing is improper, But that could not be further from the truth. We now have enormous amounts of evidence indicate that Hunter Biden was engaged in nefarious and illegal activities Foreign nationals from China, Romania, Ukraine, Kazakhstan and Russia all while making 1,000,000 of dollars doing so. We don't even know the full extent of it yet. To date, we've discovered up to $25,000,000 in payments and that's without even having Hunter Biden's personal bank records.
The question is this though. This is the question. This is why we're here. What did Joe Biden know and when? Due to the evidence that we've found to date, Speaker McCarthy appropriately initiated an impeachment inquiry to give us additional tools To get the answer to that question based on the circumstantial evidence we have the laptop, the whistleblower, shell companies bank records and testimony from Devon Archer This Congress has a duty to further investigate whether Vice President Joe Biden was an affable, loving father simply taken advantage of by his delinquent son or a knowing participant who is complicit in the scheme and financially compensated for his role.
That is why we are here today To answer that simple question to determine if our current president is compromised. Look, this scheme is complicated. All these countries and all these Different roles, different people played. But the plan is simple and repeated often. A foreign client has a problem.
The foreign client pays a Biden. The vice president leverages influence to force favorable outcomes for the client. The Biden family earns their fee. That's the scheme. We've seen it played over and over.
As we continue to investigate all of this wrongdoing, I've put a lot of time trying to figure out how all this got started. In 2014, it seems that Vice President Biden, after 4 decades of public service and thinking he would never hold public office again, started down a slippery slope. Perhaps he just wanted to help his struggling son. Maybe he never intended to sell policy decisions and for the Biden family to get 1,000,000 of dollars. But there's mounting evidence that suggests that he that that may very be what has happened.
It all began in the spring of 2014 though. Hunter Biden gets his father to have dinner with foreign nationals and his business partner, Devin Archer, in Georgetown. The 4 nationals attending this dinner were Karim Masimov, The Prime Minister of Kazakhstan, Kenneth Rakhishchev, a Kazakhstani oligarch, Yelena Buterina, a Russian oligarch who also happened to be the wife of the mayor of Moscow. We know that beginning in early 2014, Botterina sent a $3,500,000 wire to one of Hunter Biden's shell companies and Rakush have wired $142,300 to yet another shell for Hunter Biden to buy a Porsche. We have the bank records to prove this.
So the logical question here is, what was this money for? What were the goals of those payments? For Badarina, it seems her motives were clear. She knew that Russia was going to investigate was going to invade Crimea and As a response to invasion, the Obama administration would inevitably announce sanctions and visa bans. Who's left off the list that the Obama administration published?
Who was noticeably missing? Yolanda Batarina, the richest woman in Russia, the woman who wired Hunter Biden $3,500,000 just days earlier. That's just a coincidence. For Rakhishov, the motive was to leverage Biden's influence to aid in the facilitation of the sale of Kazakhstani state oil rights to Burisma. And guess what?
In December of the same year, Ruckershell's oil company and Burisma joined a Chinese Communist Party linked company and announced a deal. Everyone got rich. Again, Another amazing coincidence. These are only the first two of dozens of examples of the scheme. A foreign client has a problem.
A foreign client pays the Biden. Vice President leverages influence to force a favorable outcome for the client. Biden family earns their fee. Our work over the last 9 months warrants additional scrutiny of Biden family members and business associates and requires additional tools at our disposal to uncover whether Joe Biden was complicit again, the purpose of this investigation. Our next steps are to subpoena additional documents that will give context to these transactions to help determine Joe Biden's culpability.
We're going to subpoena Hunter Biden's personal bank records, Various business records such as invoices and contracts to clarify what these payments were for. Secret Service logs detailing movement patterns of then vice president. The list goes on and on. And again, I just want everybody remember we're doing this because the Department of Justice, the FBI, and the IRS refused to do their job. And we have evidence just in the last week that they're actively concealing these possible crimes.
If we discover That Joe Biden was taking half of Hunter Biden's income, like Hunter told his daughter in a text message. I hope that my Democrat colleagues will put politics aside, Do the right thing and join us in impeaching a corrupt president who sold out the American people. And with that, mister chairman, I yield back. Chairman yields back. Chair now recognize Mr.
Goldman from New York. Thank you Mr. Chairman. This hearing is entitled The Basis for an Impeachment
@bennyjohnson - Benny Johnson
Members of Congress are being blackmailed. Rep. @TimBurchett broke the internet on The Benny Show for speaking out on it. Thank you @JesseBWatters for covering https://t.co/x95jjQshgy
Video Transcript AI Summary
Politicians in the country may be sexually blackmailed, according to Congressman Tim Birchen. He explains that when politicians are in Washington, D.C., they may find themselves in compromising situations with attractive individuals who later reveal that there are incriminating tapes of their encounters. This leads to a situation where politicians are coerced into voting a certain way. It seems that there are more politicians involved in such situations than previously believed.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The way the country's running, we should assume the politicians are being sexually blackmailed. How can you explain the open border, the record spending, and all the BS that comes out of that town? Well, congressman Tim Birchen of Tennessee says sexual blackmail in the house, just a part of the deal.
Speaker 1: It's how it works. You're visiting, you're out of the country or out of town or you're in a motel or bar in DC And some whatever you're you're into, women or men or whatever, comes up, and they're very attractive, and they're laughing at your jokes, and And they and you're buying a drink. Next thing you know, you're in the motel room with them naked. And next thing you know, You know, you're about to make a key vote and what happens? Some well dressed person comes up and whispers in your ear, hey, man.
There's tapes out on you. Were you in a motel room on whatever with whoever? And then you're like, uh-oh. And he said, you really ought not be voting for this thing.
Speaker 0: Wow. I only thought there was like 1 Swalwell. Turns out there's dozens.
@GuntherEagleman - Gunther Eagleman™
Scott Bessent just laid every media rumor to rest over DOGE in the Treasury. Come to find out two of the DOGE members are Treasury employees. https://t.co/FikrzG2bgt
Video Transcript AI Summary
I'm here with US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent. There's concern about the DOGE team's access to payment systems. However, these two treasury employees only have read-only access and cannot make changes; they can only suggest improvements. The ability to change the system lies with the Federal Reserve, not the Treasury. Regarding IRS access, there are currently no engagements with the DOGE team, and any requests for access would be considered when they arise. The focus is on improving IRS operations, particularly concerning collections, privacy, and customer service, especially during the ongoing tax filing season.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm here with US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent in Washington. Mister Secretary, thank you for joining me.
Speaker 1: Philip, good to see you.
Speaker 0: Mister Secretary, we are inside the Cash Room at the Treasury Department. It is almost impossible to overstate how important the work that is done in this building is to The US financial system. Yet right now, there is widespread concern about the Doge team's access to sensitive payment systems. Are you worried at all that that access and that tinkering, of the payment systems could affect the treasuries market or cause any disruption?
Speaker 1: Good. Well, Solea, thank you for asking me about that because there's a lot of misinformation out there. First of all, when you say the DOGE team, these are treasury employees. There are two treasury employees. One of whom I personally interviewed in his final round.
There is no tinkering with the system. They are on read only. They are looking. They can make no changes. It is an operational program to suggest improvement.
So we make 1,300,000,000.0 payments a year. And this is two employees who are working with a group of long standing employees.
Speaker 0: The letter that the Treasury Department sent sent earlier this week talked about how the team currently does not have, access to change the system. Have they, at any point this year, had the ability to make changes?
Speaker 1: Absolutely not. This is no different than you would have the at a private company. And by the way, the ability to change the system sits over at the Federal Reserve. So it doesn't even lie in this building. So they could make suggestions on how to change the system, but we don't even run the system.
Speaker 0: And if they ask for, if they request the ability to change the system, would you grant that?
Speaker 1: No. Again, they have no ability to change the system. I have no ability to grant that change that they can make suggestions, then it would go to the Federal Reserve. And just like any large ERP system, there would be test, there would be this, there would be that. And then the Fed will determine whether these changes are robust or not.
Speaker 0: As the secretary of treasury, you also oversee the IRS. Do you know what kind of access the team has to IRS data or individual taxpayer data?
Speaker 1: Well, I'm glad you asked that too because look. The the IRS, the privacy issue is one of the biggest issues. And under over the past four years, we've seen a lot of leaks out of there. The IRS systems are quite poor. When I started in college in 1980, I learned the program in COBOL.
I think there are 12 different systems at the IRS that still run on COBOL. But as of now, there there is no engagement at the IRS.
Speaker 0: And if they request that access, would you sign off on that request?
Speaker 1: They haven't. So we'll take that when it comes to it. I I think there is a lot to do there, but the the president was elected with a big agenda. And to the extent that getting the IRS in better shape, is part of that. Sure.
Because look with the IRS, what am I concerned about? I am concerned about collections. I'm concerned about privacy. And I'm concerned that the system is robust.
Speaker 0: But do you think
Speaker 1: And customer service.
Speaker 0: But do you think that if they ask for access, that is something you would consider signing off on?
Speaker 1: There are a lot of things I'd consider. But look, we're in the middle of the tax filing season right now. We even you know, with the government buyouts, that are being that expire at midnight tonight, we have been mandated that the IRS, customer facing employees, that they're not eligible for that until May 15. So I don't imagine anything's gonna go on at the IRS until then or beyond.
@elonmusk - Elon Musk
Thanks
@RealAlexJones - Alex Jones
DOGE Bombshell! Elon Musk and President Trump CAUGHT By The Democrats Launching Operation BIG BALLS!!! Weeding Out Government Corruption Has Never Been So Much Fun! Alex Jones Is Breaking It All Down Here: https://t.co/mgceKv3fXX
Video Transcript AI Summary
We're now 17 days into President Trump's term. There's been a humorous leak in the media regarding a member of Elon Musk's Doge team, nicknamed "Big Balls." This 19-year-old, who has founded several companies, including one called Tesla.sexy LLC, is now working with Musk. The media's serious coverage of this nickname is quite comedic.
In other news, our top-selling product, concentrated Irish sea moss, has sold out at AlexJonesStore.com. However, you can still find it and other products at realalexjones.com, which shares inventory from the same warehouse. These products are designed to empower and enhance your health while supporting our operation. Check them out!
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Everybody We are seventeen days. Twenty three hours forty four seconds into the new presidency of president Trump.
Speaker 1: Everybody said I've got great balls on fire. I
Speaker 0: And now it has come out big bones. That they've been leaking and doxing in the corporate media, different members of Elon Musk's Doge team, and one of them has the nickname big balls, and they're all over the corporate media reporting it all very, very seriously. This is some of the greatest unintentional comedy ever. Here's a club.
Speaker 2: This is a 19 year old high school graduate, who has used, the unfortunate nickname, Big Balls online, so that would be one way that we could refer to him. He is now working at Musk's behest, inside Doge, and we looked into his background. And so we found, you know, several notable things, Erin. One of which, is that this individual has founded multiple companies, including one, with another unfortunate name, Tesla dot sexy LLC, which he established in 2021. He would have been around 16 years old.
Now this LLC controls dozens of web domains.
Speaker 0: Wow. Sexy. Shoes on Tesla. Drag queen story time is a bit of pedophiles, little kids is okay. And, you know, little kids giving male strippers money, three year olds, that's okay.
But if you call yourself sexy Tesla, that is unfortunate. And this person registered some domain names years ago. Woah, man. You talk about dirty, dirty, dirty, dirty people. This is just incredible.
Speaker 1: She's got big balls.
Speaker 0: No one elected big balls. Personally, I voted for big balls. You want my snacks?
Speaker 1: Oh, the
Speaker 0: best part about this is it's so much fun.
Speaker 1: My balls are always bouncing to the left and to the right. It's my belief that my big ball should be held overnight.
Speaker 0: My fellow patriots, I've got some bad news for you. I've also got some good news. Our number one all time best selling product at the AlexJonesstore.com has sold out. The concentrated Irish sea moss, we call it ultimate sea moss because it's the strongest, most concentrated out there, the superfood. It has sold out.
But there is a clone of the site with our same sponsor that runs it, and it has its own inventory right of the same warehouse in Arkansas. That is realalexjones.com. So not just the CMOS that's not available at the Alex Jones store, but some of the other products that are sold out as well are still available at realalexjones.com. They're incredible products. They empower you, make you healthier, and they fund our operation.
So if you love these products, which I know a lot of you do, or if you haven't tried these products, go now to realalexjones.com and find out how amazing these products are.
@RealAlexJones - Alex Jones
BREAKING: Desperate To Stop The Trump Agenda, Democrat Leaders Have Openly Announced A Plan To Shut Down The Federal Government In Hopes Of Ending Elon Musk's DOGE Investigation » WATCH/SHARE THE LIVE X STREAM HERE: https://t.co/V4RESKnwj3 https://t.co/whAah9AmNK
Video Transcript AI Summary
The Democrats' potential government shutdown to block the current administration's actions is a serious consideration. We're facing a constitutional crisis due to illegal actions, and I won't support funding that allows this lawlessness to continue. A shutdown is a last resort, but necessary if they won't govern responsibly.
The globalist system is collapsing, and the current administration is dismantling its institutions and philosophies. This is a revolution, a new power structure, and while I don't agree with everything, this is largely what I would do to counter a depopulation plan. The left is disintegrating; they're losing elections and panicking. The public is awakening.
Democrats are plotting to shut down the government, not just spending bills, but through sabotage. This isn't about fighting over who steals the most; it's about dismantling corrupt systems. My platform, Infowars, is under attack. Lawfare and attempts to shut us down have caused financial issues. Support us by purchasing products from AlexJonesStore.com; it could be your last chance.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: My next question, because your colleague, Jeff Merkley, basically said he's prepared to try to shut down the government over some of these sledgehammer actions that he's seeing by Elon Musk. Are you prepared to shut down the government to join Democratic colleagues who wanna stand in the way of keeping the government open?
Speaker 1: Well, you have to look at what the Trump administration is doing right now. They are simply trying to they are
Speaker 2: simply trying to they are simply
Speaker 1: trying to dismantle the government. So, yes, look, if we have to take steps to be able to hold them accountable, use the leverage that we have to force it, I cannot support efforts that will continue this lawlessness that we're seeing when it comes to this administration's actions. And for us to be able to support government funding in that way, only for them to turn it around to dismantle the government, that is not something that should be allowed.
Speaker 0: So just to be clear, senator, you are open to voting yes to shut down the government. So make this point.
Speaker 1: This is on them. This is about whether or not they can get the votes. They are the majority. And if they cannot govern, then then, you know, that's for the American people to see. But I worked in government.
I worked through multiple government shutdowns. I would be the last person to wanna get to that stage. But we are at a point where we are basically on the cusp of a constitutional crisis, seeing this administration taking steps that are so clearly illegal. And until we see a change in that behavior, we should not allow and condone that nor should we assist in that.
Speaker 2: Senator Clearly illegal. Like they said, deporting illegal is illegal. Of course, it's not. Clearly, too many can have a baby. Clearly, there's no x and y chromosomes.
I've got all these top Democrats in all these video clips, strategist, senators, deep staters saying we're screwed. There's no way to stop Trump and Musk. Oh my god. What are we gonna do? I mean, just panic buttons.
Beep beep beep beep. This is over the top. Then we've got the globalist handlers and operatives saying, oh, don't worry. We we know what we're gonna do. We're gonna crash the stock market, and, boy, they're moving to do that right now.
We're gonna get into that. And then you've got senator Andy Kim and other Democrat leaders saying, oh, we're just gonna do a government shutdown. And we don't just mean we're not gonna fund the government. Everything they've been saying Trump's gonna do. Oh, must be in the Social Security system will crash it.
They're saying they'll crash it on purpose, and they're gonna have walkouts, protests. Great. Most of these people don't even do any work there, but, you know, sabotage goes along with that. We are now twenty days, four hours, six minutes, thirty seven seconds into the second incredible administration of president Trump. This is a 100% real revolution.
This is absolutely a new power structure. This is 100% a different philosophy and a new system or new order to the old new world order. Does that mean that everybody being brought in as an angel? No. Does that mean I agree with everything Trump wants to push?
No. But in general, are myself and Ron Paul and many others aligned with Trump? Yes. And is Trump decimating and dismantling and destroying and dominating the globalist, their institutions, their operations, and their minions. Irrevocable devastation of not just their systems, but the philosophies and the demoralization and the post industrial antihuman death cult, antihuman eugenics system.
Yes. I'd have to say what Trump is doing is about 97% of what I would do, and I would never imagine he'd be that aligned when he actually launched into government. This is a totally supercharged Trump compared to eight years ago. I mean, just it is it is so amazing. And as I've said a thousand times, there's not just evil in the universe.
There's good as well. And and this globalist system was bringing us to absolute design collapse, a hellish dystopic mad scientist run depopulation plan to reduce world population by 2045 officially by 90%. In their other official documents, they say no real humans left by 2047, only cyborgs, New York Times, NBC News, Club of Rome, statements, and they mean it. Stuff they said to do in the sixties, by the eighties, they had done. Something they said in the eighties, they'd have done by the February, they got done.
Almost all of it. They said by the year 2,000, there'd be a virus released that would help bring in a global government based around World Health Organization. They did it. They said once that happened in 2020 with the launch, they and they said this decades before. We've covered it.
Made films about it. They would then, by 2030 have basically everything collapsed, and you know nothing and be happy and, you know, eating bugs. And you and and so the agenda was so hellish, and it and it counted on administratively, corporately, governmentally rolling out incrementally, but that it it it because it was incremental and because it was academic and because it was complex, it was done all these different parts, but but together constructed like an erector set or Legos, they thought the public wouldn't be sophisticated enough to understand it or ever deal with it. Well, good luck. The public's not really stupid.
They're just distracted. The public can learn everything about how a football game works and all the players and all the little factoids, but they don't wanna know about how the federalist system works or about agencies or about history or about philosophy or about military history because they they think it's boring. They don't know it's super exciting, and then it gives you incredible power in the real world. What's the Bible say over and over again? My people perish for lack of knowledge.
Well, if you've got knowledge about playing a video game, that doesn't ever really help you in any way, does it? If you've got knowledge about basketball, maybe if you're one of a few thousand professional basketball players, you do okay. If you've got knowledge though about being a plumber, you can make a good living off that. The general public can get that job. There's a lot of those jobs needed.
Being a farmer, that's something definitely you can apply or or or being an artist who's has talent. I mean, that's the that's the human system. And and the globalist wanna get rid of a system based on humans, by humans, for humans. They wanna bring in this posthuman globalist world. And their their biggest downfall was that they gave all these speeches or all these books and admitted they were doing it.
And then I would sit there and go, look what they're doing here. And they go, shut up. It doesn't exist in the New York Times. I mean, just even twelve, thirteen years ago, they had New York Times headlines going, what is globalism? Why does Alex Jones make up this term?
They were calling themselves globalist fifty years ago. That's where we get the term. The John Birch Society was calling them globalist forty years ago when I was 11 years old reading their magazine. And now you hear the press secretary and the president and Musk and all them calling them that. That's and Vladimir Putin, that that that's what they are.
Excuse me for using their own damn name. So and how you know my name is Alex Jones, and my mama and daddy named me that. I mean, they named themselves that. They're not internationals. That's the old term of all the world working together and world traveler.
That's completely different. The international man. I mean, that that that was kind of their PR move with it. No. No.
No. Globalism means big corporations with key governments manipulating and waging war on the nation state, creating power blocks and centralizing power. So that said, let me give you the big news. The left is in absolute total disintegration mode. I have all these clips and all these headlines with top Democrat leaders saying, we don't know what to do.
Trump and Musk are unstoppable. There are populist awakenings everywhere. We're losing every election all over the world. People are seeing right through us now. It's an exponential awakening.
When the public goes, oh, you mean it's cool to know about how the world works? Yeah. This morning, I went with my oldest daughter to the gym. We worked out, and we went in the sauna. Sometimes it's full, sometimes it's not.
It was full. Big sauna. Full. Probably, like, 12 people in it. One person was having a stand.
And there about twenty minutes. About five minutes in, people start, hey, Alex. What do you think about this? What do you think about that? And, yeah, we first of all, yeah, we're talking about the Super Bowl.
That's all dumb. Right? Alex bread in the circus. So couple of the guys are asking me questions. Couple of the women are asking me questions.
People are saying this. People are saying that. Hey. We watched your daughter on the show with you, son. Oh my gosh.
She's right here. You didn't notice? And and then they asked me questions about Doge and the and the what was happening with USA and the rest of it. And my daughter sometimes just gets embarrassed. You know, she's she's she's 20.
But and she agrees with my politics. I mean, she's great, but she's still sometimes, you know she goes, dad, come on. And one woman starts clapping and goes, yeah. We don't wanna hear it. And I'm like, okay.
I'm like, these people are asking me questions, and and I I understand we're only supposed to talk about football, but that's why we got this position. Do you like trillions of your tax money being stolen? The woman just looked down. I was nice about it. But but but see, women particularly the couple of the women were asking questions.
When but but we all know this particularly on average, they're the ones that think it's bad to talk about bad things that are happening, like you're farting in church or something. No. We need to admit bad things are going on. That's very positive so we can fix them. Like, if a high wind blows by in a storm and blows a bunch of the roof off, and you say to your wife, honey, we gotta, I guess, get repair people in here, fix the roof ourselves, get an estimate, or when the next time it rains, we're gonna be flooded.
And, of course, your wife doesn't say, that's negative. We don't really need to fix the roof. No. Yeah. Let's fix it.
So that attitude of the of of my daughter and that other woman is the problem. And I'm not putting Charlotte down on her to death. And she apologized after. I said, you have to apologize. But but I just made the point about if I was painted up at the team's colors when whoo eagles or whatever, it'd be like, that's a good American.
But I'm just quietly talking, answering people's questions. And, oh, don't talk about the government stealing trillions of giving it to themselves. No. No. No.
No. No. Just just just stay quiet about that. Well, revolutions aren't quiet. Unless you're a globalist, bureaucratic one that sneaks around behind the scenes and then creeps into culture and wages war against the nation's existence itself because it's planning to completely take it over and roll it into a global government and a and a tyranny to make sure the people that they've secretly taken over the economic system and bureaucratic system never figure it out and take back their rightful control.
So it was Barry Goldwater, the great senator that said, sometimes silence isn't golden. Sometimes it's yellow. But the good news is, we said about 12. There was 12 in there and people came and went. About eight of the people were listeners, and we're talk and a couple of we're talking about listening to the yesterday's show, the the Saturday show.
Now you think the globalist like that? Eight people out of 12 in a sauna. And I don't say that because my show's big. Aren't I great? No.
No. No. No. There's great shows out there reaching I mean, yesterday's Saturday show has, like what was it? Like, seventeen, eighteen million live viewers.
A hundred million of the clips. I looked this morning, more now. Not counting all the radio stations and other systems it was on. Yeah. That was me and a little crew of six people.
Five people. We had a smaller crew here today. The globalist can't withstand that. Now I'm gonna move into everything now. I want people to think about philosophy here.
Democrats plot strategy in shut get down. Fight against Trump. Not a lot of good options. We are figuring it out. Democrats struggle to keep up with Trump's dizzying pace.
US Democrats call for more aggressive tactics against Trump and Musk. We're going to be the opposition. Democrat leaders say, Trump seems to be unstoppable. Other headlines. So they're getting crushed, and this is the key.
There's a lot of keys. This was really key. For the last sixty, seventy years of just incredible corruption, it was going on before, but there's metrics and studies. It got a lot worse for World War two. We were now the big superpower and had this big bureaucracy that had grown.
Nobody watching it. They sent the National Security Act of '47 so the government could operate in secret, the CIA and others. What a recipe for disaster. And then you'd you'd you'd get people in that meant well, like like Nixon tried to cut the bureaucracy and the stealing, and then they just removed him, the most popular president until Trump now. He won with the biggest landslide in the last two hundred years.
Nixon was most popular president probably ever. It it with poll numbers, like 80%. I mean, it just when he got reelected. And they just CIA'd his ass, and he certainly wasn't a perfect angel, but he thought he was the president. He was like, yeah.
I'm in charge. They're like, for the hell you are. So Kennedy said I'm in charge. He saw that it did him, blew his head off, and he tried to cut the bureaucracy and the stealing. He wasn't into that.
And Reagan did. They shot his ass, but he he lived. He got some dumb, but not not as much as he should have. A lot of bad stuff stuck under his nose. And then you know what else happens since then.
But but but with Trump, it's the it's the real deal. And so in the past, political parties would would would get into power, and that would just mean their party got more payoffs and more USAID money and more state department contracts their wives and husbands and kids and companies. And as long as nobody tattled on the other people, everybody just, like, the insider trading and all of it. And we're talking incredible theft. You wonder how congressperson, many examples, you know, gets in and is worth a hundred thousand dollars and four years later after two terms is worth $50,000,000.
And there's other cases where they get it with nothing and they're worth, you know, a billion dollars 10 years later. It's like, where did you get that money? Well, you do this and now you get that. And so and it's her spouses you gotta watch. I mean, that's really where oh, well, Pelosi's only worth 500,000,000, but her husband, billions.
Same thing with Maxine Waters. Well, she's only worth 50,000,000, but her husband's worth 400,000,000. So and and and they had nothing when they got in congress. Nothing. So so here's the key.
In the past, they would just fight over who was running the the scam. Now there was a fight in politics, but only over who got to steal the most. With Trump, they're not going in there and just removing the bureaucrats and then putting their people in to the swap trough. They're blowing up the troughs themselves. Elon Musk said, I don't want the government contracts.
You know what? I I don't need I don't need a government incentive or rebate that's huge on every electric car sold, but the government puts massive amount, thousands, thousands, thousands, thousands of dollars in. You just get rid of it. I have the best cars. If you want electric, I've got the best.
Didn't even ever even ask Trump to keep it. Trump would've done it, and he's given up so much. And the agencies they're cutting out are the ones screwing everybody, harassing everyone, making sure you can't operate in this country competitively. That's what Trump is doing. He's literally making it a level playing field, and he's far from getting there.
How many days in are we? Twenty? So but you saw last week how they're gonna come at Trump. Last Monday, we were fourteen, fifteen days in at the press conference. A whole bunch of the press to do corporate reporters like, egg prices are at all time highs.
And it's Trump's fault. And then the press secretary goes through, oh, that Biden ordered millions and millions, hundred million chickens killed? Oh, be oh, because of energy being cut off, because of UN agreements to cut off worldwide fertilizer production, on and on and on and on. You know, those chickens eat the grain that's grown with fertilizer. I mean, it it's it's it's all been cut off the food, cut off the energy.
It's gonna take Trump a little while to get that going. And if there's sabotage, corporate level, real physical sabotage, which you know is gonna go on, it's all about Trump not being able to get his agenda through. Because his agenda is all about starting the economy back up and growth to get us out of the debt. He knows we can't pay it off now unless we massively expand, which we can do and have done before with innovation. And all this hidden technology the government's got, he's gonna start rolling out quickly.
And and and and maybe he has the center of industry and energy and AI and innovation and technology and and rocketry. We already are with Musk. Satellites. So we either expand or we implode. The global started to implode and then rule over the ashes because it's actually hard to be confident and expand.
When you have people that are ready to do it, it works. Now it's easier to say there's too many people. We need to cut carbon. We'll all fly around on private jets, but we're we're we're mismanaging things to crush everyone for the betterment of
Speaker 0: the world.
Speaker 2: No. It's just easier for the lazy, inbred globalist to have that philosophy. All their ancient feudal ancestors were the same. Oh, we keep the little people in squalor and poor because it manages them better. And that's true, but it's also because they didn't wanna innovate and empower everybody because they're threatened by anybody else having success.
That's the nature of history. That's not like some philosophy I just think the globalists are engaged in. They admit that. Neo feudalism is what the UN calls the club of Rome plan. It's horrible.
Oh, everybody gets free health care. You just when your knee goes out, they give you a cane. Oh, your eyes go out? You'll be lucky if you get glasses. You're not getting eye surgery.
Oh, you got lung cancer? No surgery. I mean, that's oh, everybody gets free health care. You just don't get anything. The National Health Service in England, you're going over the flu or cold or can't breathe, they just hand you through a window a bag of aspirin and Band Aids.
Seriously. So why is everybody coming down from Canada here? And we've got corporate fascist health care scams. I mean, it's it's horrible too because it's government teamed up big corporations killing competition. Don't shit me wrong.
What we've got is not free market. But if you got money, you can still get some health care. So at at least some real health care exists. But it's like Russian roulette what medical facility your doctor you go to. It's like I do your research.
You know, it's like a 19 gremlin compared to, you know, a brand new Ford f one fifty. And, you know, the gremlin doesn't stack up. Not all doctors, not all cars are equal. So I'm gonna really launch in all the clips and all the news when we come back, but I just wanted to set the table here. The Democrats are in full panic mode, but they've now come to a consensus and that they are going to try to shut the government down.
And I don't mean just shut down spending bills. I mean, they're they're going to sabotage. And I it's the consensus. I have dozens of clips, articles of them saying it from their top podcasters and their strategists to senators. This is what they're gonna do.
And, of course, you're like, yeah. We already knew that. Yeah. Exactly. It's obstruct, sabotage, attack.
Say, hey. He's been in 20. Yo. Why why aren't everything fixed yet? Well, they first have to cut off the trillions being stolen.
It's trillions. They gotta get control of these agencies or the globalists in there will use those agencies to attack the country literally. That's what defunding the police and the fire department not doing fire mitigation. This is all cloud and pivot collapse the country. And then have the welfare state come in with 250,000,000,000 to rebuild LA, and it all goes to Gavin Newsom and Nancy Pelosi.
She she he's her nephew. They run California. So they destroy you, and they get the relief money for themselves. And it's a formula. And I told you when the fire first started, I said, it'll declare an emergency, steal all the land, not let you rebuild, announce a fifteen minute city with one building company doing it, all controlled by him paying him.
And it's all up all official. He announced it Friday. I didn't predict it. I went I already knew they were building a fifteen minute city there, but nobody would sell. So they just burned their ass up.
And then went down the line, didn't fix the systems. Didn't drain the fire reservoir. Didn't cut the brush on purpose. Cut the fire department. Order them to stand down that night.
Left the electricity on. So when the trees and all the old brush fell on the power lines, they were supposed to trim around them, and they'd start up a big ass fire and then I went. I mean, hell, this is pretty simple. It'd be like if I came around your house and dumped a thousand gallons of gasoline in your yard and all around your house. I don't strike a match, but I know somebody's gonna start their car, and the fumes are gonna make it blow up, or somebody will be riding their skateboard and go off the curb, and it'll do a spark.
Oh, I didn't burn your house down. I just poured thousands of gallons of gasoline all around it. And then if enough of the power lines didn't fall and those high winds were coming and they knew, then they'd have somebody. And you look at the satellite, they all turn the same. Just within minutes.
Precision attack. Precision operation. Not incompetence. Precision. Alright.
We're gonna come back and go over all. There is so much more. Trump isn't just warp drive crushing the globalists. Stay with us. As you know, the Democratic Party has financed a bunch of lawfare lawsuits against me and had rigged trials where the judges found me guilty and all the rest of it.
It's been quite the saga. And then multiple times last year, they ordered the building shut without a court order, and then the federal judge blocked them. That's the US trustee from the judge department that's been involved in my bankruptcy. Well, then they had a fake auction that the judge overrode, and now we're still fighting them, and they're losing in federal court. We should know the fate of Infowars by mid March at the latest.
That said, though, when they said they owned us and that we were off the air, people stopped going to Infowarsstore.com, and and rightfully so. If it's if it's been hijacked by them, why would you go buy the products there? Well, now there's so little money in Infowars because the sales of tech, because of their hijacking and tipped to shut us down that The US Trustee could then say there's no money here and order it shut down. Now the good news is we only have a couple of thousand a day shortfall, and we have a lot of the great classic products that are still available there at the AlexJonesstore.com. We're winning, but their hoax that they've taken us over has hurt us.
So here are the products that are still in stock, but if we are shut down, it's the last time you'll get them from Infowars. That's the classic x two, the most powerful, incredible iodine out there. The classic vitamin mineral fusion is amazing. Body is the strongest tumor formula out there. 95% of humanoid.
We've got the great organic multivitamin. We, of course, got the amazing vaso beats with the nitric oxide, that, boost your heart and your whole body. Then, of course, there's Brain Force Ultra that is a really fast acting clean amazing nootropic. So there's your update. They're discounted.
They're for sale, and it keeps us on the air. I know a lot of you already love these products. They're fan favorites. They work really well. So it could be your last chance to get them.
Plus, it's easy to keep us on the air. Regardless, I need you
Speaker 3: to get the products, and they work really well. I ask that with your verdict, you not only take Alex Jones' platform that he talks about away. I ask that you make certain you can't rebuild the platform. That's what matters. That is punishment.
That is deterrence.
Speaker 4: Is there going to be a large set of plaintiffs who are gonna be dividing up the corpse of Infowars in the bankruptcy estate. And over the course of that process, that could get very, very dangerous for mister Jones. But we will be at it as long as it takes. And if you're out there right now and you're one of Alex Jones' audience members and you're considering giving him money, I just want you to know that based on the jury's verdict today, it's not a very good bet.
Speaker 3: I hope that we never see someone like him again. I hope that with your verdict, he can go away.
Speaker 4: But the money is not even really the question for me. The the question is, will this suit be successful at stopping him from being on the national stage?
Speaker 2: The very same law firms, the very same Democrat party operations, eight, nine years of law fair against Trump. Now they're attacking Elon Musk. The same people have been after me, and they're starting to lose in court. But their hoax that they took over Infowars caused a lot of people to believe that it was true, so people stopped going to Infowars. People to believe that it was true, so people stopped going to Infowarsstore.com and getting the right products, and now there's almost no money there.
We've actually gone into the red. So they may be successful shutting us down. I don't think they will be. They've been caught red handed. So to clear up any confusion, the AlexJonesstore.com is owned by our great sponsor and is helping Infowars and has set up the Alex Jones network.
So even we get shut down, we stay on the air. But it looks like we're gonna save Infowars, except everybody thinks the onion and Bloomberg own Info Wars and own the shopping cart, infowarsstore.com, so people aren't going to the store. Yes. It's still in our hands. And even when we get shut down, we're gonna be moving to the other studios.
But right now, we could shut down from lack of funds at Infowars. So get the products you love, could be your last chance to get them right now at Infowarsstore.com.
@WesternLensman - Western Lensman
🚨NEW: Chuck Schumer takes to the Senate floor to urge federal workers to use the Democrat 'Whistleblower Portal' to report “wrongdoing” by DOGE — — because Senate Democrats want to "keep accountability and transparency alive." 🤡🌎 https://t.co/Foct8T28WZ
Video Transcript AI Summary
We champion transparency and accountability. Donald Trump attempted to manipulate our democracy for personal gain, but Senate Democrats are fighting back. We've launched a whistleblower portal to address concerns about potential wrongdoing, specifically related to the "Doge" issue. We urge Americans to report any observed misconduct. We believe in government transparency and accountability, values this administration has neglected. This whistleblower portal is a step towards restoring those vital principles.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We believe in transparency. We believe in accountability. Donald Trump has tried to reshape our entire democracy to fit his unlawful impulses and serve his personal political interests. Senate Democrats won't let him. And so we have the whistleblower portal.
We are urging Americans who see some real wrongdoing being created by this Doge thing to report it. We want all we I think all Americans want government to be transparent. We all agree that ensuring accountability is vital, but thus far, this new administration has done the opposite. Today, with the whistleblower portal, we senate Democrats are taking one step to help keep accountability and transparency alive.
@elonmusk - Elon Musk
Just follow @DOGE for details. There is a firehouse of information.
@CitizenFreePres - Citizen Free Press
KAROLINE LEAVITT BRINGS THE DOGE RECEIPTS. Bootlicker democrat media hates talking about government waste. https://t.co/isqiCbdYHE
Video Transcript AI Summary
I welcome Elon Musk to the briefing room, as he provided great insights in the Oval Office yesterday, speaking in layman's terms. There is no lack of transparency with Doge. Trump and Musk are transparent about Doge's work, with an active X account and website posting contract receipts and stopped payments.
Before Musk, an unnamed bureaucrat handled government efficiency. Musk, now highly scrutinized, provides great access. We're happy to provide receipts and are not hiding anything.
Here are screenshots of contracts Doge found, like a $36,000 DEI contract for US citizenship and immigration services, a $3,400,000 DEI contract, and $57,000 for climate change in Sri Lanka. Doge identifies these line items daily. We're transparent about Doge's work, including tweets about the Federal Employee Retirement System in Pennsylvania. We provide daily transparency and accessibility.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Yesterday, gave us some information on that. We're just wondering if there's some proof evidence. Is the White House willing to share Mhmm. Evidence of those fraud claims, or can Elon Musk come to the briefing room and share material evidence of what he's talking about?
Speaker 1: Sure. I would love for Elon Musk to come to the briefing room. That's why we had him go to the Oval Office yesterday, where I think he provided great answers. He was speaking in layman's terms, speaking common sense, to all of you in the media, but also to Americans at home. But I would say especially to all of you in the media because I think it's a real fallacy, that there's this alleged lack of transparency when it comes to Doge.
President Trump and Elon Musk have been incredibly transparent on what Doge is doing. There is an x account with the doge handle. They are tweeting out what they are doing on a daily basis. They have a website where they are posting the receipts of the contracts that they are reviewing and the payments that they have stopped, from going out the door. The secretaries of of our departments have stopped from going out the door.
And I would also say that before it was Elon Musk, making our government efficient and accountable, it was some unnamed bureaucrat that none of you knew. I Elon Musk is, the richest man in the world. He's also now one of the most highly scrutinized men in the world alongside president Trump because of what he's doing and the access that he is allowing. So there's great transparency. As for the actual receipts, we are happy to provide them, and I actually brought some today because all of you know I love to bring the receipts.
We have contracts upon contracts that we can send and provide this information to you. Let me be very clear. We are not trying to hide anything. We have been incredibly transparent, and we will continue to be. These are screenshots of contracts that Doge found across our government.
This is a DEI contract, $36,000 for US citizenship and immigration services. That is against the president's policies and his America First agenda. This is a $3,400,000 contract, a council for inclusive innovation, at the US Patent and Trademark Office, Department of Commerce, another DEI contract that DOGE identified. I can continue to go through these. Oh, I love this one.
50 seven thousand bucks for climate change in Sri Lanka. What is this doing to continue the interest of the American people? Absolutely nothing. These are the line items across the federal government that DOGE is identifying daily. They're moving very fast.
There's a lot of paper that we can show you, but we're happy to do it. This administration has been more than transparent about what DOGE is doing. And here's one of their tweets that they posted about the mine. I believe this is in Pennsylvania where the Federal Employee Retirement System is being processed. Did anybody know this was even happening in our country before Elon Musk talked about it in the Oval Office yesterday?
A lot of Americans didn't. So we are providing transparency and accessibility on a daily basis when it comes to Doge.
@RealAlexJones - Alex Jones
BREAKING: DOGE Investigation Finally Forces Congress To Admit To The US Government's Long History Of Financing Al-Qaeda, The Taliban, & ISIS » WATCH/SHARE THE LIVE X STREAM HERE: https://t.co/5LOs5d45a8 https://t.co/BXAVcwr4AK
Video Transcript AI Summary
We're sending millions in cash to Afghanistan, even weekly shipments of $40-80 million, to folks like the Haqqani network. This is on top of the $697 million annually, funding madrasas, ISIS, Al Qaeda, and terrorist training camps. Programs like the Women's Scholarship Endowment aren't helping women; they're funding terrorism through USAID.
We're essentially paying welfare to Taliban martyrs' families, while American families who lost loved ones get nothing. Some argue this prevents them from joining ISIS, but it's a lie to justify funding our enemies. The US government has been backing these groups since the late '70s, using them against other countries and even against us. It's a setup for America's collapse.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And if you're wondering who's in charge of Afghanistan getting the money, and that money I just mentioned, the 697,000,000 is on top of and is in addition to the weekly to every ten day shipments in cash of 40 to $80,000,000. Afghanistan is ruled by folks named Sarajuddin Haqqani. Haqqani network mean anything to anybody in the room? How about Abdullah bin Laden? Who gets some of that money?
Does that name ring a bell to anybody in the room? Because your money your money, $697,000,000 annually, plus the shipments of cash funds, madrasas, ISIS, Al Qaeda, Boko Haram, ISIS Khorasan, terrorist training camps. That's what it's funding. If you think that the that the, the program under Operation Enduring Sentinel entitled Women's Scholarship Endowment, which receives $60,000,000 annually, or the Young Women Lead, which gets about $5,000,000 annually, is going to women, who, by the way, if you read the inspector general's report, has tell is telling you that the Taliban does not allow women to speak in public. Yet somehow, you're believing, and American people are supposed to believe, that this money is going for the betterment of the women in Afghanistan.
It is not. You are funding terrorism, and it's coming through USAID. And it's not just Afghanistan.
Speaker 1: The 40,000,000 a week that comes on the airplane and comes into Afghanistan. So the plane comes in weekly. The amount of money on the plane weekly is
Speaker 2: 43,000,000 to 87,000,000. But one thing I want Americans to understand is in that bucket
Speaker 1: of the 40,000,000 we send each week, we are paying basically welfare to the Taliban martyrs family. So every Taliban member who died during the war with us, the US government is paying them a stipend, the family. So our families of Americans who died there aren't getting squaw, but we are paying Taliban families for basically dying while attacking us. Woah. Yes.
We're funding that.
Speaker 0: This is just enraging.
Speaker 1: And, you you know, I asked a couple of people that question straight out, like, do you not think this is not ethically correct? And, actually, one person gave me an answer of, well, it'll stop them from joining ISIS. I'm like, the Taliban guy's already dead. Like, they they give you these bullshit excuses as to why they're funding, like, our enemies.
Speaker 3: You don't understand that the US government has been running what created Al Qaeda and ISIS since 1978? It's it's public. It's not even debatable. I mean, you understand the CIA and Mossad funded and controlled the the hijackers or whatever they did on nine eleven. But that's like Fox News came out in 02/2001.
You understand Israel created Hamas. Right?
Speaker 4: That's what our governments do. They're criminal.
Speaker 3: The Israeli government does horrible nasty criminal stuff. The British government does it. The US government does it. They all do it. They're all in
Speaker 5: the same sick club. I'm so sick of hearing, they're they're just incompetent. They don't know that that would they didn't know when they gave $86,000,000,000 of weapons in the pullout that that would end up being used in Syria. What? They didn't know.
They didn't know the spike protein would turn on people's white blood cells and give them vaccine induced aids. The the the that's just what it does. They knew forty five years ago. The the the
Speaker 3: That Alex Jones, he's really whacked up. Yeah. He he just talks fast. He had access a bunch of gibberish coming out of his mouth. Bullshit.
Speaker 6: The government ears Alex
Speaker 2: Jones, who has the largest audience in the country,
Speaker 6: bigger than Alex Jones, who has the largest audience in the country, bigger than any of the, networks, the biggest megaphone in the country.
Speaker 1: The deep state hates Alex Jones with a vengeance.
Speaker 0: Alex Jones is the most extraordinary person I've ever met.
Speaker 3: Alright. I started to get into Pam Bondi and the 2,700,000,000,000.0 they found stolen. I didn't finish that. So I'm gonna do that next segment. This is a short segment, and then I'm gonna tie it in with the real target here that's not being discussed except by the great Tucker Carlson and and and this broadcast.
So you really wanna know where the corruption's at that we can't get at right now with just Trump. We're gonna break down one of the enemy strongholds. They're they're most powerful domestically when we come back. The they're having senate hearings right now, congressional hearings. I can't even keep track of it.
Here's, one of the, congressmen talking about a subject I'm gonna be getting into later in more detail. USAID Taliban money laundering scheme, big article. It's come out about that. All the funding of Al Qaeda and ISIS and all these groups. We're talking about billions and billions and billions of our government through USAID and other groups funding this.
Here's a breakdown in congress.
Speaker 0: Thank you, mister chairman. USAID was created through executive order in 1961 by president Kennedy, long having lost and strayed from its mission, lost its direction. Even the Clinton administration tried unsuccessfully to to reform it, and we spend, I don't know, somewhere between 40 and $50,000,000,000 annually on this organization. And with the things that you hear, while many of us, probably most of us in the room, agree with projecting America's power for the good of all the world around the globe, Quite honestly, if our enemies were asked to design a foreign aid program that would actively undermine The United States Of America at maximum cost to the taxpayer, they would be hard pressed to create a scheme more effective than USAID. That that that's shocking to say, but I I just it's, look.
Let let's just go to a couple of things here. We left Afghanistan, and I'll just I'll characterize it as left in August of twenty twenty one. August of '20 '20 '1. So the Taliban's in charge. Taliban threatens the lives of the NGO personnel distributing USAID.
They claim credit for USAID distribution. They interfere with the distribution of USAID aid. They tax the beneficiary of the aid. They tax the delivery service. They steal the food commodities.
They they divert the funds. They extort citizens for protection for USAID aid. They create sham procurement schemes, and they threaten the lives of those who oppose those schemes. Now that all occurred before August of twenty twenty one when we were there When we were there. Now, you know, you don't have to be a rocket scientist.
You could just read. The the Taliban is classified, and if you don't know, the Taliban's in charge of Afghanistan. They're classified as a specially designated global terrorist organization by OFAC. So post 2021, so this is last year, 2024, we spent 697,000,000 of the taxpayers' dollars in Afghanistan, including $534,719,000 in change from USAID in Afghanistan. I I don't know what we think we're gonna change in Afghanistan.
We lost 22,000 lost or wounded twenty two thousand five hundred Americans in Afghanistan over the course of our term there in the war, spending over $2,000,000,000,000. We're just gonna keep on spending because somehow we think it's gonna get better. And if you will
Speaker 3: I'm gonna break down the rest of the story when we come back. Alright. I wanna finish up with representative Perry speaking about USAID and the incredible betrayal, that we have been, witnessing, funding the Taliban, Al Qaeda, ISIS, all of it. And it's not like they're idiots who don't know this. They've been funding them since the late nineteen seventies, and they use them against other countries.
They just use them against Syria. They just put their head current head of Al Qaeda is the new head of Syria. CNN, I played weeks ago. Like, this guy is really good. Sure.
He used to be the leader of Al Qaeda, but now he's not, and he's a good guy. Look. He let people have Christmas time. He let Christians go to church. Didn't kill them.
Of course, then they now are that the media is paying attention to it. And so we've had CIA whistleblowers and others come out about it, but but they know exactly what they're doing. And then they use it to attack America. And the congress was saying, you couldn't come up with policies better to hurt the country. And then all over the world, they export sexualization to children, transgenderism.
That's what people think of America worldwide. That is done to make the world turn against
Speaker 2: railroads.
Speaker 3: So on one hand, they create and and and fire up these Islamic terror groups so they can take out enemies, but also attack us and then take our liberties away. That's well documented forever. And then they also go around with all this super unpopular stuff around the world, so the world hates us and rejects us. This is all formulaic set up America for collapse, and they got us right up to the point of it. And Trump's going in and auditing thousands of these organizations and groups, not just the hundreds of federal agencies.
What is there? 500 big ones? Thousands of sub ones? I mean, this morning, I spent, like, an hour reading our list. I mean, and I knew most of them, but I had to remind myself that I was reading a bunch I never even heard of.
Speaker 2: I'm just
Speaker 3: you you think I know, but I mean, it's 500 of them. 520 something big agencies with 523. And then there was like 3,000 sub agencies and 1,500,000 NGOs in The US alone. That's not counting nonprofits. I I can't even it it it's let me explain it this way,
Speaker 2: and I'll
Speaker 3: get back to the terrorism and all the other news. The United States won World War two and was the new global superpower, and the world accepted our currency. And we had half the middle class in the world in 1950 was in The United States. Let me explain that again. The world did not have a middle class anywhere.
A big one. We taught the world how to have one. And the globalist came in and said, we don't want Americans rich and successful in all this. We wanna control this. We're gonna just start siphoning the power and the money out and pass laws and regulations that deindustrialize The United States, and then we'll control.
That is the middlemen. That's globalism. A screw job. They use communism at the grassroots to control people, but it's it's really a corporate monopolistic fascist system that has a transhumanist eugenics social Darwin culture. An anti animist philosophy, anti human.
And Elon Musk talks about he had the meetings with all the top tech people decades ago, you know, decade ago or longer. And then they're like, yeah. We wanna get rid of the humans. Yeah. There's too many of them.
Oh, come on. Stop defending humanity, Elon. We need less people, not more. And they would call it, you're an animist. That just means prohuman.
Team humanity. So I know it's hard to wrap your mind around the fact that they really hate our guts, but they do. And now Trump's getting into all these NGOs like the Kennedy Center that's such an elite globalist combine, And they just found out it's totally bankrupt, maxed out everywhere. Everybody's stealing the money. And and why would they do that?
Because they know the collapse was coming, and they were stealing as much as they could ahead of time. And then they were gonna manage the collapse as if they were our saviors and bring in totally draconian social controls on record. That's the great reset. So Elon Musk at the World Government Forum this morning, middle of the night here, told them they were gonna have a big war for their reset and the shutdown of society. And so we're just having a war against their bureaucracy for the real reset because we're in the fourth turning, which is what I told you ten years ago, six months ago, yesterday.
And it's not that Elon Musk is saying what Alex Jones says. It's how the world works. And I'm sitting here knowing the power structures, knowing the groups, knowing the different philosophies, the plans, and I'm like, this is really horrible. And I've got people for decades going off. Come on, man.
You don't know all that stuff. You can go find out about it. This is actually the real world. And just what you could do in business with this knowledge for yourself, much less save civilization. That's why everything I talk about decades ago is, like, exactly in the news now because this is what I do.
I don't sit up here and talk out of my ass at you. Go watch a show from ten years ago and then turn on a congressional hearing. Go watch a show from twenty five years ago and watch Elon Musk speak. It's the same thing word for word. Now the reason you didn't hear this from other people twenty five years ago is they come after you, and they try to put you in prison or kill you.
And they sure as hell sue this living snot out of you. So I built all this for the attacks I knew was coming. And like I told you years ago, I said I'm just waiting these people out, letting them attack me, absorbing the attacks, and I was very thankful that they had chosen me as one of their main enemies to attack because it's not gonna deter me. And I understand that alien dialectics that if I could survive and just hold on, it would only make us that much stronger in the end and give us the true avant garde gleam that we have because we are avant garde. The avant garde of the avant garde.
So this is all God's plan. And and God, I've I've told you twenty five years ago, told me all this, and I've been saying this on air that there'd be this great awakening and that this would all happen. And then God tells me, The will of the holy spirit cover this, cover that. Don't, you know, don't harp on that. Don't don't defend yourself too much.
I'm a whatever the plan is because it's for outside of me, this knowledge. I'm just a receiver. Alright. Finish up with the congressman on this. I wanna play the CIA whistleblower.
She, like, ran operations, major level, telling you the specifics of it. Here it is.
Speaker 0: Think it's gonna get better. And if you're wondering who's in charge of Afghanistan getting the money, and that money I just mentioned, the 697,000,000 is on top of and is in addition to the weekly to every ten day shipments in cash of 40 to $80,000,000. Afghanistan is ruled by folks named Sarajuddin Haqqani. The Haqqani network mean anything to anybody in the room? How about Abdullah bin Laden who gets some of that money?
Does that name ring a bell to anybody in the room? Because your money your money, $697,000,000 annually, plus the shipments of cash funds, Madrasas, ISIS, Al Qaeda, Boko Haram, ISIS Khorasan, terrorist training camps. That's what it's funding. If you think that the that the, the program under Operation Enduring Sentinel entitled Women's Scholarship Endowment, which receives $60,000,000 annually, or the Young Women Lead, which gets about $5,000,000 annually, is going to women, who, by the way, if you read the inspector general's report, has tell is telling you that the Taliban does not allow women to speak in public. Yet somehow you're believing, and American people are supposed to believe that this money is going for the betterment of the women in Afghanistan.
It is not. You are funding terrorism, and it's coming through USAID. And it's not just Afghanistan, because Pakistan's right next door. USAID spent $8,840,000,000 in the last year last 20 on Pakistan's education related program. It includes a hundred and $36,000,000 to build a 20 schools of which there is zero evidence that any of them were built.
Why would there
Speaker 3: be any evidence the inspector general can't get in to see them?
Speaker 0: But you know what? We doubled down and spent $20,000,000 from USAID to create educational television programs for children unable to attend the physical school. Yeah. They can't attend it because it doesn't exist. You paid for it.
Somebody else got the money. You are paying for terrorism. This has got to end. I yield, mister chairman.
Speaker 3: Now that's not completely accurate. They found and the news went to one in Afghanistan that was a hundred and $67,000,000, a four room concrete building built a few years ago that already had the roof fall in. So that's not true. They did build one shack. By the way, Trump just signed the executive order.
He's about to have the press conference on tariffs, and he says he will name names in that. That's how I got confused. He's like, he's gonna name names in his, but there's other. So the the he keeps us guessing. I think the bad guys are even more confused.
But since I mentioned her, here's a Sarah Adams high level managing operations for the CIA. And boy, she's been running around, making the rounds, really beating the drum, and I'm glad she has been the last six months because that's why a lot of this is coming out. She's put a spotlight on it. Here here's a clip of her.
Speaker 1: The 40,000,000 a week that comes on the airplane and comes into Afghanistan. So the plane comes in weekly. The amount of money on the plane weekly is 43,000,000 to 87,000,000. But one thing I want Americans to understand is in that bucket of the 40,000,000 we send each week, we are paying basically welfare to the Taliban martyrs family. So every Taliban member who died during the war with us, the US government is paying them a stipend, the family.
So our families of Americans who died there aren't getting squat, but we are paying Taliban families for basically dying while attacking us.
Speaker 2: Woah.
Speaker 1: Yes. We're funding that.
Speaker 0: This is just enraging.
Speaker 1: And, you you know, I asked a couple of people that question straight out, like, do you not think this is not ethically correct? And actually, one person gave me an answer of, well, it'll stop them from joining ISIS. I'm like, the Taliban guy's already dead. Like, they they give you these bullshit excuses as to why they're funding, like, our enemies. So But I
Speaker 0: think that's a huge problem in America to begin with is making excuses that For
Speaker 1: a terrorist sympathizing and not paying attention to the fucking money.
Speaker 3: You know, she looks like a smart lady. You don't understand that the US government has been running what created Al Qaeda and ISIS since 1978? So, it's it's public. It's not even debatable.
Speaker 2: I
Speaker 3: mean, you understand the CIA and Mossad funded and controlled the the hijackers or whatever they did on nine eleven. That that's like Fox News came out in 02/2001. You understand Israel created Hamas. Right?
Speaker 4: That's what our governments do. They're criminal.
Speaker 3: The Israeli government does horrible nasty criminal stuff. The British government does it. The US government does it. They all do it. They're all in the same sick club.
I don't hate the British people. I don't hate the Canadian people. I don't hate the American people. I don't hate the Jewish people. What I hate is this criminal globalist cabal.
And what Israel and groups like that do, people running it, is they go fund and finance the white supremacist groups and the Patriot fronts and people running Super Bowl ads to get buy their swastika shirts to create the illusion that anybody criticizing Israel or anybody is a Nazi. Pretty smart and pretty disgusting. I just wanna stop nuclear war and have prosperity and not have crooks running everything. Can can I have that, please? I don't wanna live by way of deception.
How about by way of truth? By way of truth, ye shall conquer. Lies. Stop it. You're gonna get us all killed.
It has to stop. We have to at least try to tell the truth and be good, or we will kill everybody. We're bad enough without trying to be evil. Just get it through your heads and stop it. You're too cute by half.
Mossad, m I six, CIA. I mean, do you really think that woman doesn't know all that?
Speaker 5: I'm so sick of hearing, did they're just incompetent. They don't know that that would they didn't know when they gave $86,000,000,000 of weapons in the pullout that that would end up be using Syria. What? They didn't
Speaker 2: know.
Speaker 5: They didn't know the spike protein would turn on people's white blood cells and give them vaccine induced aids. The the the that's just what it does. They knew forty five years ago. The the the
Speaker 3: That Alex Jones, he's really whacked out. Yeah. He he just talks fast. He had that's just a bunch of gibberish coming out of his mouth. Bullshit.
Oh, the CIA is just so stupid.
Speaker 0: We didn't know that it was going to terrace.
Speaker 3: We didn't know that money for farming, for crops, with 90% of what they grow is opium. We didn't know either. I see you. Ladies and gentlemen, I am taking the deep state on at point blank range with my intrepid crew. We have had such devastating effects together.
Our information about the globalist operate has never never been more well received in the world. We are reaching tens of millions of new people a day, not just here, but all over this planet. And all glory goes to God, but God has worked through you to keep us on the air this long. So right now, it is critical that everyone make a decision. Is Infowars and Alex Jones and his crew something that we need to preserve in this critical time to to back the Trump agenda to fully dislodge and take down the global.
So the answer is obviously yes. Now we make it easy for you to support us with incredible products at the alchemystore.com, and people love the limited edition coins. Well, we now have the latest coin, and this is one of my favorites. And the last coin that came out sold out in a week. This coin is amazing as well.
Tip of the spear, Info Wars veteran limited edition fundraiser coin, pure silver made and minted right here in America, in Missouri, designed by me. On one side, it features the coiled rattlesnake around a spear with Infowars veterans nineteen ninety seven to 2025. That's when I coined the name Infowars. I was on air before that. And tip of the spear boldly inscribed, this coin symbolizes the fight for truth and freedom.
The reverse side or the head side, a Spartan helmet with with your shield or on it. Meaning, if people died, they would get put on the shield and carry back. But sometimes, if people were getting beaten, they would throw their weapons out and run, but not Spartans. So it means you come back with it or on it, don't throw it down. You the women would tell them that on record.
You better come back with your shield or dead. Do you understand? Never surrender, victory or death, maulon lobby. This is calling for courage against tyranny and standing with the patriots because you are the tip of the spear. This coin is more than silver.
It is a symbol of the resistance and a historic momentum and a wonderful keepsake and or gift. Get yours today. Get them for friends, family, and others that you know have fought hard against tyranny. Hell, you wanna support us? Get a few extras.
The next time you see some great patriot you know, maybe Tucker Carlson on the street, Joe Rogan, Donald Trump. He texts us anybody. Give him one. This is how peaceful revolutions are financed. It's people getting historic mementos.
The founders had special mint coins that were collectibles to fund the war. I just go back and look at history and I do the same thing. It was the words to come up with these ideas from history. Those that don't know history are doomed to repeat it. The people perish lack of knowledge.
Gear limited edition. Tip of the spear. Infowars veterans limited edition. All of you that supported. All of you that fought tyranny.
You are veterans of the Infowar. It'll go fast. We need the funds. Take action now at the alexshillstore.com. And over 400 designs of t shirts, ball caps, hoodies, sweaters are at the alexshillstore.com.
And the latest I designed is a beautiful I like to rev a mess. We also have it in black and white. Big balls with 47 on the side. And if that's not what you want, we got biggest balls. Oh, and it's it's it's it's a great conversation starter.
It's hilarious. So this whole big ball thing they thought was just spreading blow up in their face. So we certainly love to use things they think that'll defeat us against them. Get yours now and keep us on the air at the AlexJonesstore.com.
@its_The_Dr - Johnny Midnight ⚡️
CNN claims that DOGE hasn't produced any examples of waste, fraud, and abuse. @RepBrianMast *DESTROYS* this false media talking point ! https://t.co/yP7zYEVJSv
Video Transcript AI Summary
Here's the latest edition of wasteful spending courtesy of USAID. Over $849,000 is going to a transgender job fair in Bangladesh, where the median monthly income is around $220. Nearly $2,000,000 will fund sex change surgeries in Guatemala, provided by a trans-led organization.
Millions more are allocated to various global initiatives, including $55,000,000 to strengthen Libyan financial processes, $20,000,000 for an Iraq Sesame Street program, and smaller amounts for similar programs in Bangladesh and Nigeria. We're also spending $22,000,000 to boost tourism in Tunisia and Egypt.
Additionally, funds are directed towards climate change initiatives in Africa ($520,000,000), green transportation in Georgia ($24,400,000), and LGBTQ+ support in various countries like Uganda ($5,500,000) and North Macedonia ($1,300,000). Even China is getting $5,000,000 to reduce carbon emissions. This is just the latest list of wasteful spending. Time for change.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hey, everybody. Chairman Brian Mast House, Foreign Affairs Committee. Got another edition of wasteful spending from, you guessed it, USAID. Let's get into the numbers. $849,000 plus for a transgender job fair in Bangladesh, where the median monthly income is about $220 a month.
Nearly $2,000,000 for sex change surgeries in Guatemala by a trans led organization. $55,000,000 to strengthen Libyan public financial management processes. 31 and a half million dollars to help USAID employees with counseling, organizational resilience, wellness, and work life balance. That's a lot of money for work life balance there. $20,000,000 to create a Sesame Street program in Iraq.
Four Point One Million Dollars to create a Bangladesh Sesame Street program. Another $5,200,000 to create a Nigerian Sesame Street pilot program. A lot of money going to these little puppet muppets, in these foreign countries. $3,900,000 to teach essential life skills through Bangladeshi muppets. More muppets.
$22,000,000 to increase tourism in Tunisia and Egypt. Man, we want to spend a lot of money on their tourism. We should be spending that on American tourism, maybe. $520,000,000 to pay ESG consultants to teach people in Africa about countering climate change $24,400,000 to build green transportation alternatives in the country of Georgia. Twenty nine million dollars to diversify crop agriculture in the country of Georgia.
Four Point Five Million Dollars to teach individuals in Kazakhstan how to fight back against internet trolls. $1,300,000 to create a comfortable environment for LGBTQ people in North Macedonia. 4 Hundred And 20 Thousand Dollars to build solar panels in Djibouti. Eighteen Thousand Seven Hundred And Ninety Three Dollars to help LGBTQ individuals vote in the twenty twenty one Honduras elections. Five million dollars to reduce carbon emissions in China.
Yeah. We're giving China Five Million Dollars there. $5,500,000 to improve the lives of LGBTQ individuals in Uganda. Dollars Twenty Three Thousand to host DEI recruitment seminars in San Martin and in Lima, Peru. Dollars 60 5 Million 7 Hundred Thousand for vasectomies in The Congo.
I don't even like that word. $595,000 to empower Uganda's LGBT community to push back against anti LGBTQ legislation. $4,300,000 to provide services for men who have sex with men in South Africa. I have no idea why they wrote it that way. $15,000,000 to identify and enhance the leadership of LGBTQ leaders in Cambodia.
We're resurrecting leaders there for millions of dollars. 1 hundred thousand dollars to conduct a DEI survey in Ghana. Fifty Thousand Dollars to create a DEI fellowship in Uzbekistan. Thirty Thousand Dollars for DEIA facilitated conversations in Senegal. There is a new list of all of the ways that USAID is wasting your money on top of all of the old ones that we gave you already.
Time for change, everybody. The change is coming.
@GuntherEagleman - Gunther Eagleman™
Does she know what happened to the last CNN reporter who challenged @timburchett? Dude lost his job! LOL!!!!
@martinwalsh__ - Martin Walsh
GOP Rep. Burchett turns CNN host into a stuttering mess Brown: “No one is disagreeing there is bloat, waste! CNN has been covering at length where the money is going to” Burchett: “No you haven't. All y'all do is run down Musk & Trump … that's why your ratings are in the tank” https://t.co/AeVC6zs5Qk
Video Transcript AI Summary
We're not debating whether there's waste in government; everyone agrees on that. The issue is how we're addressing it. Firing staff overseeing nuclear weapons, only to realize the mistake and try to bring them back, seems clumsy. It's like using a sledgehammer to remove fat from a steak, making a mess.
You're focusing on the messenger, not the results. Under the Biden administration, someone in charge of nuclear secrets, who stole women's luggage, wasn't questioned. Humans make mistakes, but these programs are bloated. People are upset about returning to work, but no one disagrees there's bloat. Why aren't you exposing wasteful spending like the $10 million for circumcisions in Mozambique? You only focus on Elon Musk and Donald Trump, which is why your ratings are down.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Congressman, hold on. I wanna go to this question because, again, it's it's not a question of whether waste should be rooted out of the government. So many people agree with that. But now we're seeing it's the way it's being done. The government is trying to claw back several employees who oversaw nuclear weapons after they were fired.
They realized, oh, we made a mistake. We need the staffers who oversee nuclear weapons. A professor at the University of Maryland, Don Kettle, who specializes in silver service told the Washington Post that, yes, the government is likely full of wasteful bloat, but said a clumsy fix is worse than no fix at all, saying it's like going to a meat market, getting a piece of steak, and trying to cut out the fat with a sledgehammer. That would only make a mess of the meat. Do you think congressman that is a fair point that the way this is being done is clumsy rather than methodical?
Speaker 1: Again, you're upset about that. You're you're attacking the message carrier, not the results. You you talk about nuclear, secrets. You had a nuclear a person who is in charge of nuclear secrets, a person who is in charge of nuclear secrets, a man who dressed up as a woman would go into the airport and steal women's luggage, was overseeing those nuclear secrets under the Biden administration, and I never heard y'all say a peep about that. Again, ma'am
Speaker 0: I I don't know anything about that. I'll be transparent.
Speaker 1: Ma'am, it's over the Internet. It's all over. He was on charge
Speaker 0: the Internet. And this is unrelated to the people overseeing nuclear weapons being fired. And Elon Musk himself said, we're moving so fast. Of course, there will be mistakes. The question is, you know, some of these mistakes are really high stakes.
Firing accidentally firing people overseeing nuclear weapons. Do you see that point?
Speaker 1: Humans will make mistakes, ma'am, but currently, these are bloated programs. You have no show employees that are that are angry that they're having to go back to work, that they've moved, and they're not
Speaker 0: No one's disagreeing. There's bloat and waste. Jobs were. No one's disagreeing.
Speaker 1: Well, then why are y'all not exposing it? Have y'all have y'all even talked about, hey. Mozambique. We sent them $10,000,000 for circumcision. I mean, goodness gracious, ma'am.
Americans are paying
Speaker 0: We have we've been covering at
Speaker 1: length salaries.
Speaker 0: Where the money is going to.
Speaker 1: You all all y'all do is run down Elon Musk and Donald Trump, and you continuously do this, and that's why your ratings are in the tank, ma'am, you need
Speaker 0: to get ball Tim Birchit. We're gonna leave it there.
Speaker 1: He's tired.
Speaker 0: I do appreciate your time coming on and having this conversation. Thank you very much. Coming
@GuntherEagleman - Gunther Eagleman™
Tim Burchett absolutely destroys CNN, again! 😂 https://t.co/QCjJH1Az5A
Video Transcript AI Summary
Putin was dealing with Biden, and he knew Ukraine was stealing money we sent. Under Trump, that stops, ending the fighting and our wasted money in a war we shouldn't be in. Ukraine's president admitted not knowing where half the money went, which has been widely reported. The money sent to Ukraine is paying off "war pimps" at the Pentagon, prolonging the war for profit while young men die. We were on both sides at the start of the war with gas contracts with Russia and giving money to Ukraine. Missile defense systems went to Ukraine and members of Congress had stock in the missile defense company. Putin is responsible, but why isn't there outrage about China? Because everything is made there and it's all about the dollars.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: At the time, you were worried about Putin watching president Biden, who was obviously not in not fit as a fiddle, and licking his chops. What do you think Putin's doing now? Because it it does seem as though The United States position is to sidle up and and ally with Russia and to criticize Ukraine.
Speaker 1: Well, in the past, Putin was obviously, he was dealing with with Biden, and he knew that Ukraine was stealing, at least by their own admission, half the money that we sent them. So now under Trump, they know that's gonna stop and the fighting will stop. So I I don't I don't see the equivalency there other than that president Trump has stopped the fight is gonna stop the fighting, and he's stopping us throwing our money down a well over there in a war we have nothing to do with. So, yeah, I I stand by my previous statement, and and it holds well.
Speaker 0: I don't think it's accurate to say that Ukraine was stealing half the money over there.
Speaker 1: Well, their their own president said they don't know where half of it is. Now you all gotta get your facts straight because everybody knows that. It's been reported in multiple news sources.
Speaker 0: As you know, most of the money that went to Ukraine was military aid, weapons that were manufactured and purchased in The United States.
Speaker 1: I So so you're paying off our the war pimps at the Pentagon to to prolong this war. I mean, it men are dying because of of of somebody's profit sheet is what you're saying, and that's what this country is about, and that is wrong, and that needs to stop. And it's stopping under Trump, and that's why both sides are quietly pitching a fit right now because they're not gonna get rich off of young men dying and old men making terrible decisions, and that's exactly what's going on.
Speaker 0: I think people are dying because Russia attacked Ukraine. I mean, I think that that is the reason why people are dying.
Speaker 1: At the beginning of that war, we were on both sides, if you haven't forgotten. We we had gas contracts with with Russia, and then we were given money to Ukraine. So in effect, as the big bankers sometimes do, they play both sides of the of the coin. And that's that's exactly that's why nobody's in a rush to get this thing going. So we ought to be at war because America's gonna profit.
Is that what you're saying? Because that sounds a whole lot like what you're saying. Well, you just said that that that the the arms are being bought here in America and that 's so people should die? Why don't they just give that 200,000,000,000 to arms manufacturers and then nobody dies? I mean, by by your own admission, you're saying that we're in that that this is a profiteer situation, and that's exactly what it is, and it needs to stop.
Speaker 0: I mean, you can put words in my mouth and then argue with them, but that doesn't mean I said them. What I said was the money wasn't I was trying to explain what Zelensky meant when he said he'd like to see where that money went.
Speaker 1: Country if he's in charge of that country and their finances, then dad come at why doesn't he know where the money went? That's what you're saying. And and and you can't have it. That is wrong. That is as we're borrowing that money every dollar we gave to Ukraine is borrowed.
We are borrowing that from our great grandchildren. We're $36,000,000,000,000 in debt. We have no business being over there except a lot of people's stock portfolios is going through the roof. Do you know when we gave our missile defense system to Ukraine that when president Biden by executive order did that, that that members of congress in both parties had stock in the missile defense company, and that was a multibillion dollar contract. That was a no bid contract to replenish our missile supply.
This thing is about dollars and cents, and they don't give a rip about young men dying. So did you And that that's the bottom line.
Speaker 0: Conservatives, Republicans at the time praised president Trump for having the courage to send those javelin missiles to Ukraine to fight Russia. Was that a was that a mistake?
Speaker 1: They were in a defensive mode, not in an offensive mode, and that's exact that's a complete difference.
Speaker 0: Is play is is on the offense right now?
Speaker 1: No. But but those missiles are that's what those missiles are for is is defensive moves, not for offensive. Now we're we're we're it's it's unlimited. The money and and supplies we're giving them or have given them, they're unchecked by Zelensky's own words. And I'm not putting words in your mouth, and and you're not putting them in mine.
Those are Zelensky's own words that he doesn't know where that money went. So that that should tell you some things about this whole war, what it's about. It's not about a conflict of freeing a a entrapped people. It's about making dollars.
Speaker 0: Do you think that president Putin is responsible for this war beginning?
Speaker 1: Absolutely. 100%. Putin's a thug. But again, where is all the the outrage in the in the halls of congress about about the mistreatment of people by the Chinese? Nobody's gonna go to war by them, and I'll tell you why.
Because you flip over every every computer chip or everybody's tie, it's gonna say made in China because it's all about the dollars, brother. That's the only reason.
@ThePatriotOasis - The Patriot Oasis™
BREAKING 🚨 New leaks indicate that Hakeem Jeffries was caught paying protesters to rally against DOGE, Elon Musk and President Trump. https://t.co/B7K0ZYN2R8
@EndWokeness - End Wokeness
This is a must watch. Trump lists off a bunch of insane scams that US taxpayers were funding before DOGE: https://t.co/8CfrKboiQl
Video Transcript AI Summary
Here's a glimpse at some wasteful spending I've uncovered. We're talking $22 billion from HHS for housing and cars for illegal immigrants, and $45 million for diversity scholarships in Burma. Millions more are going towards initiatives like sedentary migrant inclusion, LGBTQI+ promotion in Lesotho, and indigenous empowerment in Central America.
I've also found $8 million allocated to making mice transgender, $32 million for a left-wing propaganda effort in Moldova, and $10 million for male circumcision in Mozambique. There's nearly $2 billion tied to a decarbonization committee, plus millions more for fish monitoring, voter confidence in Liberia, and illegal alien hotel rooms in NYC.
Other questionable expenditures include vegan climate action in Zambia, social change in Uganda, public procurement in Serbia, learning outcomes in Asia, and a record-breaking $101 million in DEI contracts at the Department of Education.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Just listen to some of the appalling waste we have already identified. $22,000,000,000 from HHS to provide free housing and cars for illegal aliens. $45,000,000 for diversity, equity, and inclusion scholarships in Burma. Forty Million Dollars to improve the social and economic inclusion of sedentary migrants. Nobody knows what that is.
$8,000,000 to promote LGBTQI plus in the African nation of Lesotho, which nobody has ever heard of. $60,000,000 for indigenous peoples and Afro Colombian empowerment in Central America. 60 Million Dollars. 8 Million Dollars for making mice transgender. This is real.
$32,000,000 for a left wing propaganda operation in Moldova. Ten Million Dollars for male circumcision in Mozambique, Twenty Million Dollars for the Arab Sesame Street in The Middle East. It's a program. $20,000,000 for a program. $1,900,000,000 to recently created decarbonization of homes committee headed up, and we know she's involved.
Just at the last moment, the money was passed over by a woman named Stacey Abrams. Have you ever heard of her? A $3,500,000 consulting contract for lavish fish monitoring. $1,500,000 for voter confidence in Liberia. Fourteen Million Dollars for social cohesion in Mali.
Fifty Nine Million Dollars for illegal alien hotel rooms in New York City. He's a real estate developer. He's done very well. $250,000 to increase vegan local climate action innovation in Zambia. Two Million for social and behavior change in Uganda.
Fourteen Million Dollars for improving public procurement in Serbia. Forty Seven Million Dollars for improving learning outcomes in Asia. Asia is doing very well with learning. You know what we're doing. We should use it ourselves.
And $101,000,000 for DEI contracts at the Department of Education. The most ever paid, nothing even like it. Under the Trump administration, all of these scams, and they are far worse, but I didn't think it was appropriate to talk about
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m willing to risk my job to reveal why government officials are opposing Elon Musk and DOGE. There’s pushback from Congress members on both sides because tracing the money will expose connections to their families working for various agencies. This town is as corrupt as it gets. I know I might face backlash for speaking out, but it’s the truth. It seems like Elon Musk might be the one to set things right.
@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes
Rep Tim Burchett says he’s willing to lose his job to tell us the REAL REASON government officials are opposing Elon Musk and DOGE “They’re gonna push back because you’ve got Congressmen on both sides of the aisle. If they follow that paper trail, it's going to come back to them. You've got their wife and or girlfriend that works for some agency, quasi-agency or some business. This towns as crooked as a dogs leg” “I’ll get primaried for saying that but that’s the truth and we all know it” “Somebody’s gonna straight it out, it looks like it’s gonna be Elon Musk”
Video Transcript AI Summary
We discussed specific areas with Elon Musk, and I'm encouraged by his disclosures. There's potential here that hasn't been fully realized. There's definitely pushback from those who would be implicated if the truth comes out. This town is crooked, and it looks like Elon Musk might be the one to straighten things out.
I think using the decision package process is a good avenue to pursue. America will demand action. As for getting in touch with Musk, just send up the bat signal. I encouraged him to move as fast as possible. We also discussed the VA, specifically those 50 and older drawing checks. I believe waste, abuse, and fraud can offset the cuts, especially as people return to work. I'd like to see codification happen as soon as possible.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We wanted to ask you about Elon Musk's message in there. What did he talk to you guys about? What was sort of the the main message?
Speaker 1: Well, we talked about specifics in areas that I don't I wanna discuss both the specific parts of it, but it's very encouraging of the things that he's he's disclosing and and where he's headed with this because they haven't even really cracked the nut. I mean, you've got education in the Pentagon that are out there. And you know when this thing started?
Speaker 0: Has there any sort of conversation or pushback, you know, from folks who are
Speaker 1: Oh, yeah.
Speaker 0: Gonna they're
Speaker 1: gonna push back because Uh-huh. You've got congressmen on both sides of the aisle. Mhmm. That if they follow that paper trail, it's gonna come back to them. You got their wife and or girlfriend that works for some agency, quasi agency, or some business.
And I'll I'll probably get a I'll get primary per se, but that's the truth, and we all know it. And this town's crooked as a dog's leg. Somebody's gonna straighten that out. Looks like it's gonna be Elon Musk.
Speaker 0: Did he give you guys his phone number like he did for the senators? Yeah. Argue with the data. And that will be
Speaker 1: Do you
Speaker 0: like that, Smarter? Okay. And what about using the recession?
Speaker 1: I tell you, dude, you're gonna say, hey.
Speaker 0: Will you
Speaker 1: call Elon?
Speaker 0: Phenomenal. I'm not gonna hit him. What? Did he give you the number? Oh, yeah.
No. Did did he?
Speaker 1: No. No. I'm going on to your question.
Speaker 0: What do you think about using the decision package process? Resilience to codify some of this.
Speaker 1: I think that's a that's a avenue to take. I would like to do every dad got one on there, but we don't have the guts to do it. So Do
Speaker 0: you think it'll really happen?
Speaker 1: I think it will eventually. I think America's gonna demand it after that show the democrats put on last night.
Speaker 0: Mhmm. And so how do you get in touch with, mister Musk if if lawmakers do have any concerns about I'm on
Speaker 1: the phone.
Speaker 0: Mhmm. What?
Speaker 1: Send up the bat signal.
Speaker 0: Did he say anything to someone like the concerns needs to slow down, take a little bit more of the botches?
Speaker 1: No. I mean, I I encouraged him to go as fast as possible because we're gonna lose our guts. Hundred, hundred and fifty days. This bunch is gonna oh, man. It's cutting into my
Speaker 0: Anything about the recent VA cuts come up?
Speaker 1: Other than we primarily discussed we we broke down some of the the aspects of the people that are a 50 years old that are and people that are drawing a check and and how much how much that is and just how substantial that is.
Speaker 0: But it is the 80,000 VA cuts that were made known today.
Speaker 1: Well, they're gonna but I believe that they'll we'll equal those out with the waste abuse abuse fraud. And when people start going back to work, I think that's gonna take care of
Speaker 0: some of that. And the ones
Speaker 1: that choose not to, that it'll come off that side of the ledger.
Speaker 0: Any any thank you. Any talking
Speaker 1: about
Speaker 0: codifying?
Speaker 1: You're doing something different.
Speaker 0: I curled my hair. Thank you. I got girls.
Speaker 1: I noticed that stuff. And I found out who okay.
Speaker 2: Lily Pulitzer was pretty quick.
Speaker 0: Was there any conversation in there about codifying the Doge cuts and about Oh, yeah. Did anyone say that
Speaker 1: they I don't know about him there, but when we sure. Well, that's what everybody talks about.
Speaker 0: Did anyone say that they wanted that in the CR though even though Johnson's already set it off the table?
Speaker 1: You're talking about meeting with the president
Speaker 0: today CR though today or or with Elon? Elon.
Speaker 1: Well, he doesn't he's not gonna make a decision on legislative type of things. That's gonna be up to us. Again, it goes back to that guts thing that we lack.
Speaker 0: But did anybody I would like
Speaker 1: to see it. I would like to see it as soon as possible.
Speaker 0: Did anyone in there say that they wanna see it in the CR?
Speaker 1: I possibly did.
Speaker 0: Did you?
Speaker 1: What do you got? You you don't have anything? Just smiling about my Lily Pulitzer. I said, who's Lily Pulitzer?
Speaker 2: He said, honey, it's Lily Pulitzer.
Speaker 1: And that's sweet little dress that me and Edger don't wear. And I said
Speaker 0: And the Bye. Of the president, did you have any other message for him today?
Speaker 1: I had a lot of messages. It was great. It was great. He was so open, and it's a young age. Been you know, he's I've been on the edge of a lot of tough votes.
Mhmm. And they didn't go the way that he would have liked, and he's never called me cussing. He's never threatened. Yeah. Correct.
We've always talked in a business like manner.
Speaker 0: So he convinced you to vote for a clean CR?
Speaker 1: He convinced me. Yeah. But I I wanna see some things. I the what the definition of a clean CR. When you say clean CR, but we've got some Mhmm.
Adjustments, adjustments, and those adjustments are what you got you got the word.
Speaker 0: He's seeking your vote. Is that what he was?
Speaker 1: Yeah. Obviously. I mean, yeah, we've gotta we've gotta give him a little
Speaker 0: room to work. You're usually not CR.
reSee.it AI Summary
I just shared my thoughts on Tim Burchett's comments about Elon Musk and the implications of DOGE. He believes Musk is exposing corruption, suggesting that a paper trail could lead to accountability for politicians. Burchett argues that taxpayer money is being misappropriated and calls for potential jail time for some individuals, including members of Congress. His remarks highlight the ongoing concerns about graft and the misuse of campaign funds.
@GuntherEagleman - Gunther Eagleman™
🚨Tim Burchett just laid out how Elon Musk is over the target right now and calls for people to go to jail over what DOGE is uncovering, including members of Congress. "All you’re seeing right now is the graft, and that’s why the left is pitching such a fit because Elon Musk, very bravely, has stated there is a paper trail, and it will lead us to where this is." "You know good and well that that stuff's going to go right out of the American taxpayer’s back pocket, right into the pockets of politicians and the past we’ve seen it go into campaigns." "That’s been documented through some other funding sources, but now I think you’re going to see some people should go to jail and possibly members of Congress."
Video Transcript AI Summary
There's graft occurring, and the left is upset because Elon Musk bravely stated there is a paper trail that will expose where taxpayer money is going, likely into politicians' pockets. In the past, it's been documented to go into campaigns, but now, people, possibly even members of Congress, should go to jail if they or their family members are profiting from this.
Billionaires form NGOs with prominent board members, and the government dumps stolen taxpayer money into them, which is then filtered out among board members and political friends. Musk will document this, which is why there's such a strong reaction. Many prominent Democrats have ties to these NGOs, including Obama's transportation secretary, Biden's EPA chief, Nancy Pelosi, and Gavin Newsom. The hope is to prevent America from going bankrupt.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Formative and very in-depth tweet. So thank you for that.
Speaker 1: Thank you, congressman.
Speaker 0: And and and all you're seeing right now is the graft, and that's why the left is pitching such a fit because Elon Musk very bravely has stated there is a paper trail, and it will and it will lead us to where this is. And you know good and well that that stuff's gonna go right out of the American taxpayers' back pocket, right into the pockets of politicians. In the past, we've seen it go into campaigns. That's been documented through some other funding sources. But now you're I think you're gonna see some people should go to jail and possibly members of congress.
Speaker 1: So possibly members of congress because what the suspicion is is that these the money is going out of the government under under democrat run administrations, and it could be getting recycled back in campaign donations. Do you have hard evidence for why members of congress should go to jail?
Speaker 0: Well, if they're involved in it and if and if if their family members are profiting from it, then you're a dadgum right they should. Absolutely, 100%. And and honestly, if it's going in their campaigns, it's going into something else. These NGOs are very well documented by Elon Musk. He explained to us pretty easy how they do it.
Some billionaire will put a million dollars and form some NGO with a great name. It'll have a million dollars in their account and have a few prominent people on their board. And then the federal government's looking for places Democrats are looking for places to to dump these tons of stolen taxpayer money into an NGO, and then they they take it and they filter it out among their board members and their political friends. And that's the way it works, and he's gonna document it. And that's why you're seeing them pitch such a fit.
And also, I think someone ought to look at all the young members that are out there on the on the ledge on this thing pitching a fit about it. All they're all they're doing is these old timers are are allowing them to walk the plank so they can do their dirty work and it they their hands are never touching it.
Speaker 1: Yeah. We found names like, you know, Obama's transportation secretary, Anthony Fox, Michael Regan. Michael, Regan is Biden's EPA chief. You know, Nancy Pelosi, Barbara Lee, Gavin Newsom touted a nonprofit involved in this. We have, you you know, Democrat mayors like Bill de Blasio, LA mayor Eric Garcetti.
So it's very deep. Obama's o b OMB aids, his energy department people. So congressman, your point is well taken. We'd love to get your reaction please to Elon Musk revealing the staggering dollar amount that Doge is finding every day. Watch.
Speaker 2: What we do is an in consult consultation with the cabinet secretaries and with their departments. You know how to read an income statement and you know how to read a balance sheet. You've had some business experience. I'm kidding, but Yeah. You know about this stuff.
Yeah. I mean, really, just don't want America to go bankrupt. Savings
@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes
James O’Keefe just tried confronting the NIH official caught on hidden camera saying they’re manipulating data to lie to DOGE to get US taxpayer funded grants He sped off in his car screaming "I’m the expert, not you!" These people need to go to prison https://t.co/c2c0uMgQ53
Video Transcript AI Summary
James O'Keefe confronts an NIH employee about a video where the employee discusses changing the word "race" to "ancestry" in a protocol. O'Keefe questions if this is deceitful and suggests ancestry isn't the same as race for medical trials. The employee denies lying and claims the change was for scientific accuracy, stating he is an expert. O'Keefe questions why he would change the words and accuses him of avoiding accountability. The employee drives away in his Tesla, claiming O'Keefe doesn't care about people. O'Keefe says he cares about people knowing what's going on in their government. He describes running after the employee in boat shoes, calling it an adventure.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hey. I'm James O'Keefe. You work with the NIH. This is you on camera. I heard you had a really bad day.
You're about to have a worst day. This is you on camera talking about talking about giving information to people, taking out the word race. You remember this?
Speaker 1: Like, yesterday, I was approving a protocol to figure out
Speaker 2: what the suggested issue is.
Speaker 1: I had suggested, like, I think of your ancestry instead of race.
Speaker 0: Isn't that deceitful?
Speaker 2: You're just gonna get out of realm.
Speaker 0: Yeah. I'm out of your way. Isn't that deceitful what you did, sir? To lie? I don't know what you I didn't lie.
You're on video. Changing the words? But but you did lie. I absolutely You said changing the words from race to ancestry. Why would you change the words?
Why would you but but you would change the words. Isn't that deceitful, sir? Absolutely not. It's not a matter of scientific accuracy, though. Absolutely, it was.
So? It was.
Speaker 2: Don't know what you're talking about. Don't know
Speaker 0: what You you should do. You're on you're on video. You do know what I'm talking about. We're here with the guy inside the NIH who's driving away in his Tesla. Listen.
You work for the government. You know, it's Sir, you're avoiding accountability by changing the words from race to ancestry. Isn't it true that ancestry isn't the same thing as race for medical clinical trials, sir.
Speaker 1: You don't you don't care about people and their health or their
Speaker 0: I'm a journalist. I care very much about people. You said I don't care about health. You're the one changing the words in the clinical trials, sir.
Speaker 1: I believe in good science. I believe in protecting the people.
Speaker 0: Then why did you say it's ancestry instead of race?
Speaker 1: For, accuracy. Scientific accuracy.
Speaker 0: That doesn't sound accurate, though.
Speaker 1: I'm an expert. You're not.
Speaker 0: I'm an expert. You're not. Are you kidding me? I'm an expert. You're not.
The deceit of these people. The conceit of these people. So the NIH official staggering towards his white Tesla backing up saying I'm in his way. I'm not in his way. He could clearly walk from where he was into his vehicle, claiming I'm disrupting.
And then he we conduct the interview. He rolls his window down and proceeds to talk to me. He says that I don't care about people, that he cares about people, and he's not being deceitful even though in the video, he clearly changes the words from race to ancestry to circumvent Doge. Clearly pissed off. He's had a bad day.
He even told our undercover journalist via text message. It's a bloodbath at work. People losing their jobs. So I didn't wanna make his day worse, but I was kinda surprised he he didn't just drive away. He kept talking to me.
I think he was in a state of shock. He rolled the window down. He said as he was driving away, he said that, I care he cares about people I don't. He he says to me as he's driving away in his Tesla, which that's ironic, by the way, he said that I don't care about people. He cares about people, of course.
We care deeply about people. We want people to know what's going on in their government, and anybody who's against the mission of people knowing what's going on doesn't seem to care about people. They always either run away, assault me, call the police, or say nothing. That was like everything but calling the police right there and assaulting. Very interesting here in Bethesda, Maryland.
Stay tuned. It's always an adventure with OMG. So I'm literally I'm literally running after this guy wearing boat shoes. I don't know why whenever I'm, like, actually needing to athletic clothing, I'm not. I'm I'm in like a suit.
I'm wearing the like least comfortable shoes to run-in ever. And I was we're we're like we're on a floss sprint asking him about Ancestry in the boat shoes and the laptop. Don't try this at all. Okay? That's what I'm saying.
reSee.it AI Summary
I just heard Congressman Tim Burchett drop a major revelation about a paper trail leading to Washington, DC. He suggests that many lawmakers are nervous and predicts retirements as evidence of corruption and overseas money comes to light. This could really shake up Congress!
@pr0ud_americans - 𝐃𝐔𝐓𝐂𝐇
Congressman Tim Burchett drops a bombshell: “You’re going to see a paper trail come back to Washington, DC. That’s why a lot of people are nervous. Going to see a lot of retirements. They are stealing from the American people and got caught.” He’s hinting at evidence tying overseas money to corrupt lawmakers, predicting a wave of resignations as the truth surfaces. No hard details yet, could shake up Congress?
@RWTNews - 🇺🇸🇺🇸Red White and True News🇺🇸🇺🇸
Jesse Watters sits down with the DOGE team to talk about what they are finding. The corruption is off the charts. (Part 1) https://t.co/qsfkgC5uwg
Video Transcript AI Summary
Government fraud often starts small but escalates over time, with examples including stadium rentals. Investigators become desensitized due to its prevalence. The Small Business Administration gave loans to dead people and those with impossible birthdates, totaling hundreds of millions of dollars.
The Inter-American Foundation (IAF) spends a large portion of its funds on management and travel rather than grantees, with only a small percentage reaching the intended recipients. There are layers of stealing through contractors and subcontractors.
One contractor was caught advising a colleague to falsify billable hours. Some agencies, like the United States Institute of Peace, have shown extreme resistance, including having loaded guns in their headquarters and a $130,000 contract with a former member of the Taliban. The Institute of Peace's chief accountant deleted a terabyte of accounting records, and unspent funds were swept into a private bank account. The evidence was referred to the FBI and DOJ.
A deferred resignation program offered attractive separation terms, but some were talked out of it. The effort to combat waste and fraud is a long-term enterprise.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Party.
Speaker 1: It's a big party. You'd think if you were stealing, you'd start small. They do start small. But then over what happens is over the years so generally, the fraud starts out small and they try to hide it. But then year after year, if nobody stops the fraud, it gets more and more brazen.
And and every year it gets bigger until they're literally renting out stadiums. I like in
Speaker 2: I mean, I million dollars to rent out a stadium?
Speaker 1: Fraud infra infragrante delecto. Okay? We're talking at scale.
Speaker 2: This is driving me crazy.
Speaker 1: Oh, yeah.
Speaker 2: When you find these things, do you guys get mad? You're like, yes. I got one. How does it how does it make you feel?
Speaker 0: It's so common.
Speaker 1: It's so common. I mean, you just get numb to it. Unfortunately, get like, the hundredth time you've heard it, you it's hard not to get a little numb. Yeah. You know?
But, like and by the two hundredth time, you're like, well, okay. It's just another day at the office.
Speaker 3: We checked, is the small business administration giving loans to dead people, people over the age of 20? Yeah. The answer was yes, and it was around $330,000,000 in total.
Speaker 1: So People with a birthday that could not possibly be real. Yeah. Meaning, they're they're over a hundred they're 15 years old or older. The oldest living American is 14. So it's safe to say if anybody is in the system as 115 years or older, that is fake.
Speaker 4: So just by sharing a database and looking at social security numbers, that showed that at the time of the loan, they had listed as over 15
Speaker 1: years old or actually 11. We didn't even check for 18. Babies and dead 11 years old. That's pretty clear. Babies and dead people who were getting loans.
Speaker 4: That was $660,000,000.
Speaker 1: And also people with birth dates in the future.
Speaker 2: What does that mean?
Speaker 1: Well, in one case, I mean, I think the, like the birth date, birth date, I think in one case was like
Speaker 2: Fetuses were getting loans?
Speaker 1: No, not even. No, really sort of like, you're talking about like your great grandchildren. Like with the birth date, like, I think it was like 02/1965. So more than a century from now was the birth date.
Speaker 2: George Jetson was getting paid.
Speaker 1: Yes. Because your birthday is in the future, like the far like the far future, not like next year. Right. And we either this is either fraudulent or we have your birthday wrong. Right.
It's either a typo
Speaker 2: or someone stealing.
Speaker 1: Which is it? Yeah. Right. Yes. You should should at least ask which is it?
Speaker 2: Do you guys feel you're getting justice and accountability?
Speaker 5: One of the the extreme examples of non, accountability in some cases is has occurred at some of the small agencies. I think the Inter American Foundation, IAF, is one of the agencies we visited where, you know, they get $50,000,000 a year congressional money to give grants. These are things like, you know, alpaca farming in Peru, improving them That's
Speaker 1: a that's a real example.
Speaker 5: That's a real description. Improving the marketability of peas in Guatemala. Really? Fruit jam.
Speaker 6: And What? Yeah.
Speaker 5: Yeah. Yeah. So you might expect, you know, in the private sector, a nonprofit to give, you know, 80 to 90% of their money to grantees. In the case of IAF, that was 58%. So the other half goes towards management Oh, yeah.
Travel.
Speaker 1: What what we find exactly I mean, as an example is is that even if you agreed with supporting alpaca farmers in Peru, well, actually most of the money never made it out of DC. Mhmm. It's going into the pockets of people in in the neighborhood.
Speaker 2: What percentage And then you get to Peru. Right. So what percentage do you think doesn't even get to the destination it's supposed to?
Speaker 1: I believe the GAO estimates, this is not our estimate. I believe it was on the order of only 10 to 15¢ and the dollar actually gets to the end recipient. Whether you agree with that cause or not.
Speaker 2: So they're just stealing the money before it even gets anywhere.
Speaker 1: There's layers of stealing. So there's like, there's the first layer of stealing, second layer of stealing, third layer of stealing. Subcontractor, subcontractor. Yeah. Exactly.
Contractor, subcontractor, subcontractor. It's like peeling an onion. And then maybe, and sometimes it's zero. Just flat, you get to the bottom of the onion. There's nothing there.
Speaker 2: So maybe no one got a sex change in Guatemala.
Speaker 1: It's possible that no one got a sex change in Guatemala.
Speaker 0: I overheard a contractor tell one of her colleagues to falsify billable hours by creating a PowerPoint to mask a delay in the onboarding process in front of me. And this is like hour zero at this agency. And so, I mean, this is just a common theme that you take a look at these contracts, you take a look at these grants, and it's veiled in noble rhetoric. You know, it's at the top level. It's like It sounds good.
Yeah. It sounds amazing. And then you actually just follow what is the what are the funds actually doing?
Speaker 1: Or send us a picture.
Speaker 0: Exactly. And
Speaker 1: The the send us a picture request is incredibly good at like, Pixar didn't happen. And then and then like and and it wouldn't be that hard to just frankly, they could search for for some fake pics on the Internet or get AI to generate the pics, but they don't even bother doing that.
Speaker 2: So you you caught them cold billing fraud?
Speaker 0: Oh, I caught them her advising her colleague to do this because it takes a few days to onboard. So that is being investigated right now.
Speaker 1: Yeah. I mean, generally, like, like these programs, these grants are gonna be like along the lines of save the baby pandas. And it's like, well, of course, who wouldn't wanna save the baby pandas? And, you know, in some cases they've got a show panda, which they will try it out for special occasions. In a lot of cases, don't even have a show panda.
No panda. There's not even one panda because we asked for pictures and we don't even get one panda. And he's like, well, you gotta well, that's a lot of you know, what's a billion dollars get you? Does not even get you one panda?
Speaker 2: You really wanna see a baby panda?
Speaker 1: Yeah. That will like, you know, like the Ebola money. We're like, okay. Well, we agree with like, we shouldn't have Ebola. You know?
Where is the money going? Oh, it's going to Deloitte in DC. Like, what what is an accounting firm doing with Ebola money?
Speaker 2: What has been the biggest resistance? Is there one agency? Is there one department that when you guys walk in, they all start fighting you, start hiding
Speaker 1: Wait, who gonna talk? I'm sorry. But I guess you can answer that question. Sure. I mean, let's let's yes.
We've we've certainly had some battles. Battles? Yeah. Yeah. I mean Yeah.
Speaker 6: The the
Speaker 1: Who who should talk about you, sir? NAID. Yeah. Okay.
Speaker 6: Yeah. So, Jesse, there's there's NAID. It's a small agency called the United States Institute of Peace. It's definitely the agency we had the most fight at. We actually went into the agency and found that they had loaded guns inside of their headquarters.
Institute for Peace. It's two for peace.
Speaker 1: I mean, any given company any given organizational name is gonna be kinda be the opposite of the title. Right.
Speaker 6: Yeah. Yeah. And so it was the by far the least peaceful agency that we've worked with Yeah. Ironically.
Speaker 1: Of
Speaker 6: course. Additionally, we found that they were spending money on things like private jets, and they even had a $130,000 contract with a former member of the Taliban. This is this is real. We don't encounter that at most agencies.
Speaker 2: Yeah. What was the money going to the Taliban for?
Speaker 6: So it was a contractor. They received a hundred and $30,000 for generic services. And to Elon's point, there was not actually a clear description of what the contractor services were for. But was it for opium? Unclear.
Speaker 1: Or weapons?
Speaker 6: Or nothing. Or or nothing. Or or abroad.
Speaker 1: Or, yeah, nothing. And and
Speaker 6: you naturally have to ask the question, how did we get here? Like, when the country was founded, there were only four agencies. Today, there are over 400. So there's been a 100 x increase in the number of agencies since the founding of the nation. And thanks to president Trump, he's now signed two executive orders to start to reduce the number of agencies in the government, and the institute of peace was one of them, which is why our team went in to try and understand what was going on.
And that's when we found all of the craziness like the weapons in their armory. We found the payments to the Taliban. Okay.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 1: The the accountants here. Oh, yeah. So just try to hide hide the evidence.
Speaker 6: Right. So just a few hours after we got into their headquarters, we found that their chief accountant had actually deleted over a terabyte of accounting records from several So you'd have to ask the question, well, why would somebody do that? And the Doge team, fortunately, was able to recover that data with the help of a few great employees at the Institute of Peace. And I think the most troubling thing was they received $55,000,000 a year from congress and any money that went unspent instead of returning that to congress, they would sweep it into a private bank account, which had no congressional oversight and that's what they would use to fund things like events at their headquarters and the private jets. And so I think it's a great example because most most Americans don't know what's going on at a lot of these smaller agencies and this is a I think the most extreme case of some of the wasteful spend that we're finding.
Speaker 2: So the agencies are hiding money from you. They're sending it to the Taliban. They have loaded weapons in the department buildings.
Speaker 6: At the Institute of Peace.
Speaker 2: At the Institute of Peace. Yeah.
Speaker 6: That's right.
Speaker 2: So this is a cover up when you guys roll in?
Speaker 1: This one, yes, a cover up. Yes. It's a cover up. They did delete a vast amount of financial information. That's really a definition of a cover up.
Speaker 2: Isn't that illegal to delete evidence?
Speaker 1: Yes. Documents?
Speaker 6: It is. It's it's certainly illegal to delete accounting records that the that congress would certainly want to know where where the congressionally appropriate funds are going from from taxpayers.
Speaker 2: When you catch them going Hillary style on their computers, do you refer this to the Department of Justice?
Speaker 6: In this case, we did refer the evidence in the accounting example to the FBI and DOJ. We were proud to do that. So, yes, we did.
Speaker 3: Resistance has shown up in some very surprising places. So for example, the famous fork in the road email, the deferred resignation program. So this was a program where you could resign from the government, collect pay and benefits for the next eight months. Probably the most attractive separation program ever in human history. And the resistance actually came from the outside with people saying this is a trick.
And I've heard somebody refer to it as an apple with a razor blade. And, no, this was just a really juicy apple, caramel dipped apple. It it it was that good, but people were talked out of out of taking it. And now what started to happen is we did have about 80,000 people take it, and now those folks who did take it are on the beach or they've moved on to a new job and they're still getting paid. And so now we're starting to offer fork two and fork three where people can see that someone's eaten this apple and it was actually really tasty and good for them.
Speaker 2: Is Doze just getting started? Is this is a long term enterprise.
Speaker 1: It's a long term enterprise that because if if we take our eye off the ball, the waste and fraud will come roaring back.
Speaker 2: They can doge doge when democrats get back in power? Yeah.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Well, I think some of the things that like, we're we're trying to have it be such that the the funding is is removed, so the grants gone. So there's it that if there's a lot of work required to restart the waste of fraud. And and that that will at least slow it down.
Speaker 2: Elon Musk shows primetime, the cave, the money faucet, and the stone age phones. Right back.
@iAnonPatriot - American AF 🇺🇸
The amount of FRAUD that DOGE has uncovered is insane.. Here’s the whole Jesse watters interview.. 🔥🔥 https://t.co/VTwCKmLzPQ
Video Transcript AI Summary
Doge, led by Elon Musk, investigates government waste and fraud. The team found the Treasury lacked budget codes for $5 trillion in payments, and a $4 billion COVID fund was misused for parties at Caesar's Palace and stadium rentals. The Department of Education now requires receipts for fund withdrawals, but these are not verified. The Small Business Administration gave $330 million in loans to dead people and $660 million to babies or people with future birthdates.
The Inter-American Foundation (IAF) spends only 58% of its funds on grantees, such as alpaca farming in Peru, with the rest going to management and travel. Only 10-15 cents of each dollar reaches the intended recipient due to layers of subcontractors.
The United States Institute of Peace was found to have loaded guns, spent money on private jets, and had a $130,000 contract with a former member of the Taliban. The agency's chief accountant deleted over a terabyte of accounting records, and unspent funds were moved to a private bank account.
The government stores retirement papers in a mine, a process taking six months and involving manual calculations. The Postal Service is losing billions annually due to regulations since 2007. "Big Balls" is working on payment computer systems to root out fraud, as most systems lack payment accountability. Doge members have faced threats and hostility for their work.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Our exclusive look into Doge. Elon Musk was nice enough to invite us into the Eisenhower Building last night to sit in on his weekly 10PM Doge meeting. Yeah, they usually meet at 10:00. I'm almost in bed by then. We met the whole crew, even big balls, and they showed us how Doge really gets done.
We sat back, listened, and we learned a lot, and we hope you do too. Here's part one of our exclusive interview. Elon, thank you so much for bringing us to the meeting here. I'm gonna do something no anchor ever does. I'm not gonna talk.
What? As long as I'm gonna you run your and then I'll interrupt when I'm bored. So take it away.
Speaker 1: So like a board meeting. Like a board
Speaker 2: meeting. Exactly.
Speaker 1: Alright. Well, I guess we normally go around the table, say what what do we get done this week? Wait. This way? Sure.
No. We start with you. Sure.
Speaker 3: So actually, lot of great work at the treasury this week. One of the crazy things at with regards to the treasury is that when a payment is made and the computers of the treasury actually pay about $5,000,000,000,000 per year, like crazy amounts, there was formerly not a budget code on there. So if some payment was made, you didn't know actually what it was for. It could have been for anything.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 3: There was a a $4,000,000,000 COVID fund in the Department of Education and there was no receipts required so people could just draw down on it. And when people looked into it, this wasn't just before us, they found that money was being used to rent out Caesars Palace for parties, out stadiums, etc. And so the one change that Doge made with Department of Education is we had the simple requirement that if you draw down money you must first upload a receipt. That was the only change that was made. You must upload your And upon doing so, nobody drew down any money anymore.
Speaker 1: Yes, but we didn't say that we'd check the receipt. You could send a fake receipt. You could send a picture of your dog. Anything. Anything.
Anything. And and they but as soon as we asked for anything at all, they suddenly the requests were like, oh, we don't need it anymore. That's interesting.
Speaker 0: They were renting Caesar's Palace.
Speaker 1: Yes. They were like basically partying of a tax share of money.
Speaker 0: Stadiums. Yes. Leasing stadiums. Leasing stadiums. For what?
Speaker 1: For parties, basically.
Speaker 2: For parties?
Speaker 1: Yes.
Speaker 0: That's a big party.
Speaker 1: It's a big party. You'd think if you were stealing, you'd start small. They do start small. But then what happens is over the years so generally the fraud starts out small and they try to hide it. But then year after year, if nobody stops the fraud, it gets more and more brazen.
And and every year it gets bigger until they're literally renting out stadiums. I like in
Speaker 0: I mean the million dollars to rent out a stadium?
Speaker 1: Fraud infra infragrante delecto. Okay? We're talking at scale.
Speaker 0: This is driving me crazy.
Speaker 1: Oh, yeah.
Speaker 0: When you find these things, do you guys get mad? You're like, yes. I got one. How does it how does it make you feel?
Speaker 4: It's so common.
Speaker 1: It's so common.
Speaker 2: You know? I mean,
Speaker 1: you just get numb to it. Like, you get like, the like, hundredth time you've heard it, you it's hard not to get a little numb. Yeah. You know? But, like and by the two hundredth time, you're like, well, okay.
It's just another day at the office.
Speaker 5: We checked, is the small business administration giving loans to dead people, people over the age of 20? The answer was yes, and it was around $330,000,000 in total.
Speaker 1: So people with a birthday that could not possibly be real. Yeah. Meaning, they're they're over a hundred they're 15 years old or older. The oldest living American is 14. So it's safe to say if anybody is in the system as 115 years or older, that is fake.
Speaker 6: So just by sharing a database and looking at social security numbers that showed that at the time of the loan, they had listed as over 15 years old or actually 11. We didn't even check for 18. Babies and 11 years old.
Speaker 7: That's pretty clear. Babies and dead
Speaker 1: people who were getting loans.
Speaker 6: That was $660,000,000.
Speaker 1: And also people with birth dates in the future.
Speaker 0: What does that mean?
Speaker 1: Well, in one case, I mean, I think the birth date, I think in one
Speaker 0: case was like Fetuses were getting loans.
Speaker 1: No, not even. No, really sort of like, You're talking about like your great grandchildren. Like with the birth date, like, I think it was like 02/1965. So more than a century from now was the birth date.
Speaker 0: George Jetson was getting paid.
Speaker 1: Yes. Because your birthday is in the future, like the far like the far future, not like next year. Right. And we either this is either fraudulent or we have your birthday wrong.
Speaker 0: It's either a typo or someone stealing.
Speaker 1: Which is it? Yeah.
Speaker 2: Right. Yes.
Speaker 1: You should at least ask which isn't.
Speaker 0: Do you guys feel you're getting justice and accountability?
Speaker 8: One of the, I think, extreme examples of non accountability in some cases is has occurred at some of the
Speaker 2: small agencies. I
Speaker 8: think the Inter American Foundation, IAF, is one of the agencies we visited where, you know, they get $50,000,000 a year congressional money to give grants. These are things like, you know, alpaca farming in Peru, improving them
Speaker 1: That's not that's a real example.
Speaker 8: That's a real description. Improving the marketability of peas in Guatemala. Really? Through jam. And yes.
What?
Speaker 7: Yeah. Yeah.
Speaker 2: And so
Speaker 8: you might expect, you know, in the private sector, a nonprofit to give, you know, 80 to 90% of their money to grantees. In the case of IAF, that was 58%. So the other half goes towards management
Speaker 6: Oh, yeah. Travel.
Speaker 1: What would it find exactly, Domingue, as an example is is that even if you agreed with up with supporting alpaca farmers in Peru, Well, actually most of the money never made it out of DC. Mhmm. It's going into the pockets of people in the neighborhood.
Speaker 0: What percentage And then
Speaker 1: get to Peru.
Speaker 0: Right. So what percentage do you think doesn't even get to the destination it's supposed to?
Speaker 1: I believe the GAO estimates, this is not our estimate. I believe it was on the order of only 10 to 15¢ and the dollar actually gets to the end recipient. Whether you agree with that cause or not.
Speaker 0: So they're just stealing the money before it even gets anywhere.
Speaker 1: There's layers of stealing. So there's like, there's the first layer of stealing, second layer of stealing, third layer of
Speaker 0: stealing. Subcontractor, subcontractor.
Speaker 1: Contractor, subcontractor, subcontractor. It's like peeling an onion. And then maybe and sometimes it's zero. Just flat you you get to the bottom of the onion. There's nothing there.
Speaker 0: So maybe no one got a sex change in Guatemala.
Speaker 1: It's possible no one got a sex change in Guatemala.
Speaker 4: I overheard a contractor tell one of her colleagues to falsify billable hours by creating a PowerPoint to mask a delay in the onboarding process in front of me. And this is like hour zero at this agency. And so, I mean, this is just a common theme that you take a look at these contracts, you take a look at these grants, and it's veiled in noble rhetoric. You know, it's at the top level. It's like
Speaker 1: Sounds good.
Speaker 4: Yeah. It sounds amazing. And then you actually just follow what is the what are the funds actually doing?
Speaker 1: Well, send us a picture. Exactly. And The the send us a picture request is incredibly good. Like, Pixar didn't happen. And then, like and they're, like and and it wouldn't be that hard to just frankly, they could search for for some fake pics on the Internet or get AI to generate the pics, but they don't even bother doing that.
So you
Speaker 0: you caught them cold billing fraud.
Speaker 4: Oh, I caught them her advising her colleague to do this because it takes a few days to onboard. So that is being investigated right now.
Speaker 1: Yeah. I mean, generally, like these programs, these grants are gonna be like along the lines of save the baby pandas. And it's like, well, of course, who wouldn't wanna save the baby pandas? And, you know, in some cases they've got a show panda, which they will try it out for special occasions. In a lot of cases, they don't even have a show panda.
No panda. There's not even one panda. Because we asked for pictures and we don't even get one panda. And he's like, well, you gotta well, that's a lot. You know, what's a billion dollars get you?
Does not even get you one panda?
Speaker 0: You really wanna see a baby panda?
Speaker 1: Yeah. That will like, you know, like the Ebola money. We're like, okay. Well, we agree with, like, we shouldn't have Ebola, you know. Where is the money going?
Oh, it's going to Deloitte in DC. Like, what what is an accounting firm doing with Ebola money?
Speaker 0: What has been the biggest resistance? Is there one agency? Is there one department that when you guys walk in, they all start fighting you, start hiding I
Speaker 1: thought you weren't gonna talk.
Speaker 0: I'm sorry.
Speaker 1: But I guess you can answer that question. Sure. I mean, let's yes. We've we've certainly had some battles. Battles?
Yeah. Yeah. I mean, we should talk about you, sir.
Speaker 3: Oh, me. Yeah.
Speaker 1: Okay.
Speaker 2: Yep. So, Jessica, there's there's me. It's a small agency called the United States Institute of Peace. It's definitely the agency we had the most fight at. We actually went into the agency and found that they had loaded guns inside of their headquarters.
It's a two for peace.
Speaker 1: I mean, given company any given organizational name is gonna be it kinda be the opposite of the title. Right.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Yeah. And so it was the by far the least peaceful agency that we've worked with Yeah. Ironically.
Speaker 1: Of
Speaker 2: course. Additionally, we found that they were spending money on things like private jets, and they even had a $130,000 contract with a former member of the Taliban. This is this is real. We don't encounter that at most agencies.
Speaker 0: Yeah. What was the money going to the Taliban for?
Speaker 2: So it was a contractor. They received a hundred and $30,000 for generic services. And to Elon's point, there was not actually a clear description of what the contractor services were for. Was it for opium? Unclear.
Speaker 0: Or weapons?
Speaker 2: Or nothing. Or or nothing.
Speaker 0: Or abroad.
Speaker 1: Or, yeah, nothing. And and
Speaker 2: you naturally have to ask the question, how did we get here? Like, when the country was founded, there were only four agencies. Today, there are over 400. So there's been a 100x increase in the number of agencies since the founding of the nation and thanks to president Trump he's now signed two executive orders to start to reduce the number of agencies in the government and the institute of peace was one of them which is why our team went in to try and understand what was going on And that's when we found all of the craziness like the weapons in their armory, we found the payments to the Taliban. Okay.
Speaker 3: The the
Speaker 0: accountants here.
Speaker 1: Oh, yeah. So just try to hide
Speaker 2: the evidence. Right. So just a few hours after we got into their headquarters, we found that their chief accountant had actually deleted over a terabyte of accounting records from several years. So you'd have to ask the question, well, why would somebody do that? And the Doge team fortunately was able to recover that data with the help of a few great employees at the Institute of Peace.
And I think the most troubling thing was they received $55,000,000 a year from congress and any money that went unspent instead of returning that to congress, they would sweep it into a private bank account which had no congressional oversight and that's what they would use to fund things like events at their headquarters and private jets. And so I think it's a great example because most most Americans don't know what's going on at a lot of these smaller agencies and this is a I think the most extreme case of some of the wasteful spend that we're finding.
Speaker 0: So the agencies are hiding money from you. They're sending it to the Taliban. They have loaded weapons in the department buildings.
Speaker 2: At the Institute of Peace.
Speaker 0: At the Institute of Peace. Yes.
Speaker 2: That's
Speaker 0: right. So this is a cover up when you guys roll in?
Speaker 1: This one, yes, a cover up.
Speaker 9: It's a cover They
Speaker 1: did delete a vast amount of financial information. That's really a definition of a cover up.
Speaker 0: Isn't that illegal to delete evidence? Yes. Shred documents?
Speaker 2: It is. It's it's certainly illegal to delete accounting records that the that congress would certainly want to know where where the congressionally appropriate funds are going from from taxpayers.
Speaker 0: When you catch them going Hillary style on their computers, do you refer this to the Department of Justice?
Speaker 2: In this case, did refer the evidence in the accounting example to the FBI and DOJ. We were proud to do that. So, yes, we did.
Speaker 5: Resistance has shown up in some very surprising places. So for example, the famous fork in the road email, the deferred resignation program. So this was a program where you could resign from the government, collect pay and benefits for the next eight months. Probably the most attractive separation program ever in human history. And the resistance actually came from the outside with people saying this is a trick, and I've heard somebody refer to it as an apple with a razor blade.
And, no, this was just a really juicy apple, caramel dipped apple. It it it was that good, but people were talked out of out of taking it. And now what started to happen is we did have about 80,000 people take it, and now those folks who did take it are on the beach or they've moved on to a new job, and they're still getting paid. And so now we're starting to offer fork two and fork three, where people can see that someone's eaten this apple, and it was actually really tasty and good for them.
Speaker 0: Is Doge just getting started? Is this is a long term enterprise.
Speaker 1: It's a long term enterprise because if if we take our eye off the ball, the waste and fraud will come roaring back.
Speaker 0: They can doge doge when Democrats get back in power.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah. Well, I think some of the things that like, we're trying to have it be such that the the funding is is removed, so the grants are gone. So this it that if there's a lot of work required to restart the waste of fraud. And and that that will at least slow it down.
Speaker 0: Elon Musk shows primetime the cave, the money faucet, and the stone age phones. Right back. We're back. Part two. The exclusive interview with Elon Musk and the Doge Boys.
They took us inside the caves of bureaucracy. Watch this. We heard about a cave. We had federal workers working in a cave.
Speaker 1: I That's me. Yeah. They still Joe's actually been to the cave. Do do you wanna tell tell us about your your cave your cave your cave cave?
Speaker 2: I went I went mining
Speaker 0: a Spelunking?
Speaker 1: You're you're spelunking.
Speaker 10: So I've been helping out
Speaker 1: with with retirement.
Speaker 10: Been helping out with retirement. And a few weeks ago I had chance to go to the mine. And so I took a golf cart through security down into the side of a mountain and entered daylight left and I entered this whole space of caverns and roads and we get to a metal door and I open it up and there in front of me is is a sea of filing cabinets from the nineteen sixties. And I'm walking around, it's super chilly, smells like paper.
Speaker 1: And
Speaker 10: I, you know, I realized for for as a mind, it's great mind. It's secure. It's well lit, temperature controlled. And so the question we're not ask we're asking is not is this a good place to store physical media, which it is. It's amazing for that.
The question is, why are we still using paper in 2025? So I brought something to show you Yeah. Of what's inside the mind.
Speaker 1: And and and only the the normal process for retirement is over it'll be over six months. So once you file your retirement papers, that's why it takes six months.
Speaker 0: Mhmm. What what is that?
Speaker 10: So these are replica case folders that people use to retire from the government. And so these are all compiled by hand and moved around on carts through the mind. It takes many months to do that, and this one is a single retiree's paper required to leave the government.
Speaker 1: If somebody wants to retire, they can't because it takes six months to compile the paper and carry the paper into a mine where it is stored. And and also, all the calculations are done by hand.
Speaker 0: Everything has to
Speaker 1: be replaced by
Speaker 10: Reconciled, adjudicated. This is thicker than the Word of the Rings trilogy. Yeah. And if I had to process this, I would rather do my taxes in the dark than have to go
Speaker 1: through this. Yeah.
Speaker 10: And so what we're doing is we're we're bringing this process online with modern software. And I'm excited to share that as of tonight, we have 25 retirees going through an entirely online retirement process in the government for the first time.
Speaker 0: It sounds so simple. Yes.
Speaker 10: And and it's great collaboration with retirement services inside OPM. So this has always been their dream, we're just here to help accelerate it.
Speaker 0: That's a pretty fat stack. Was that Kissinger's?
Speaker 1: Oh, no. This the record is almost I mean, several shopping carts.
Speaker 10: For there's a whole pallet for one retiree That's a with 27 boxes of paper on it.
Speaker 0: For one guy.
Speaker 1: That's the record.
Speaker 10: I've seen it with my own eyes.
Speaker 1: Yeah. I mean, it's certainly and and it also frees up people because we we shouldn't have over a thousand people carrying paper into a mine. That that is not a good use of human of people's lives. So there are many other things that they could do that would be far more productive than carrying paper into the light.
Speaker 0: If you were to say, we have iPhones, did does the government have payphones? Like, prehistoric is this technology?
Speaker 1: Oh, yes. It's it's it's very sorry. It's very prehistoric. It's like Flintstones.
Speaker 0: It's Flintstone level stuff.
Speaker 1: It's it's so prehistoric. Like dinosaurs would think this is, you know, kinda old. Okay. That's how prehistoric it is. Okay.
So we're I mean, basically, the only thing loving was a sponge when that's how prehistoric it was.
Speaker 0: Okay. So we're leaving the stone age, and we're moving into the golden age.
Speaker 1: The pre Cambrian era is what we're talking about. Okay.
Speaker 0: There was a story I heard about mules. There were mules delivering mail to the bottom of the Grand Canyon.
Speaker 1: Which might not might not be a bad thing, actually. You have the mule picture.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Pics or it doesn't exist.
Speaker 1: Right? Yeah. Yeah. But this and this this is a case where actually it might not I think do we agree with the mule or or should should there be mules?
Speaker 11: I think it can be modernized.
Speaker 1: If there's opportunity for improvement. Yes. Right. Okay.
Speaker 11: Right. So, yeah, I'm at the postal service. I I think a lot of people don't realize that there's actually a law that says that the post office is supposed to, like, have a balanced budget.
Speaker 1: There is?
Speaker 11: Yeah. There is.
Speaker 1: I didn't know that.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Right.
Speaker 1: Well, that's not working, is it? No. It's not. So So they're breaking the law?
Speaker 11: They're breaking the law. Okay. Basically, since 02/2007, almost every year since 02/2007, they've they've lost money. So you might ask, like, what happened in 02/2007?
Speaker 1: So there was there was additional What happened in 02/2007?
Speaker 11: Yeah. There was additional regulation Okay. That went into place that essentially crippled them and put them down this, like, not good path where they essentially are stuck in the past as well as bleeding money left and right. Okay. So, like, it's great, and and we appreciate that the Postal employees are are willing to go to the hardest parts, like, in this country, but we think that we can we can modernize it and and help them become profitable.
Speaker 1: How many people have lives in the same?
Speaker 11: Right now, last year, they lost 9 and a half billion dollars.
Speaker 0: Wow.
Speaker 1: Yep. Serious money.
Speaker 0: We finally meet Big Balls. Up next. Part three. Here's the interview with Elon Musk and the rest of the Doge crew. We finally ask the one question on our mind.
Who's Big Balls?
Speaker 1: It's me. That should be obvious. Why
Speaker 0: do they call you Big Balls?
Speaker 7: I just said it as my LinkedIn username. Okay. Well, people on LinkedIn take themselves, like, super seriously, and they're pretty adverse to risk. And I was like, well, I wanna be neither of those things. So I just I said it, and then, honestly, I didn't even think anyone would notice.
Speaker 1: Yeah. When you clicking this so cringe.
Speaker 0: What does Big Balls do?
Speaker 7: Right now, I'm working on some payment computer stuff. So one of our initiatives is to root out fraud and waste. And to do that, we started looking at the payment computers. And as mentioned earlier, like, there is no accounting of what payments actually go to in the payment computer. So, like, you look at a specific line item, like $20,000,000, and you're like, okay.
Well, what is this money going to? And for the majority of payment systems, it's like, well, we don't really know.
Speaker 1: And They're like, what? That would be the response.
Speaker 0: Is this the most basic responses?
Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah. That's the most common response.
Speaker 0: What do you say when people just say, I don't know.
Speaker 7: Well, it's a huge cause for concern because, like, the upstream thing, is distributing the money, literally has no checks and no no accountability to the actual American taxpayer. So it's a huge vector for fraud, waste, and abuse.
Speaker 0: Do these people not respect taxpayer money?
Speaker 7: I mean, there's no incentive to you if you work in the government. I think the incentives will always decide the outcomes.
Speaker 1: Yes.
Speaker 0: Do you guys feel like you're putting yourself at risk by doing this because you're stirring up so much hostility by these people ripping us off?
Speaker 1: A %. Well, we don't need to speculate about that. You can see online in in the protests that they make that very clear. I mean, I've been hanged in effigy many times, and there have been people that have actively advocated at these violent protests violent protests for my death, and who also advocated for the death of the the people at Doge.
Speaker 8: I think the young folks of us have gotten female threats from reporters and the public alike. I think speaking for myself I dropped out of Harvard and came here to serve my country and it's been unfortunate to see you know lost friendships, most of campus hates me now, but I think fundamentally I hope people realize through conversations like this that reform is genuinely needed and if there's one I think this is important to say if there's one group of people who really have a shot success it's the people here you know they're up until 2AM Monday through Sunday, those should not recognize weekends we're working all
Speaker 1: the time.
Speaker 0: Inspired you to drop out of Harvard to do this?
Speaker 8: You know there's a lot of, reform that's needed, I think the value of this and the impact here is so much more vast than anything you could learn in a classroom doing computer science.
Speaker 0: And you guys are sleeping here. I'm hearing you guys are up all night. You have this meeting at 10:00 every Wednesday.
Speaker 8: We'll probably, go back to work
Speaker 2: right after this. Yeah.
Speaker 0: You're going back to work after this.
Speaker 2: Yes. Right.
Speaker 0: It's almost 11:00. So that's early.
Speaker 8: That's early.
Speaker 0: It's early? Can I go to bed? That's an incredible work ethic. You guys should be really, really proud of yourself. Do good people come up to you and say thank you for doing what you're doing?
Speaker 9: Absolutely. There are people in the state department that will stop you or all of the agencies that we've been to that'll stop you in the hallways or write emails and say, was scared to write this or I don't know if you're interested in this, but they usually have great ideas. And if they often have the best ideas because they've worked in the places and they've been stifled by the bureaucracy for so many years. So one of the the great things that at least in my that I, you know, we listen to them and empower them.
Speaker 1: Yes, in fact, I'd like to emphasize that because we'd like to just give a big thank you to all the government employees who are helping reduce the waste and fraud because this is, you know, we really couldn't do it without you. So
Speaker 0: it's a group effort.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah. Absolutely. So it's I'm not trying to sort of say all government employees are bad. That's absolutely not the case.
It's just that, you know, there actually just does need to be a serious effort to reduce the waste waste and forward and we're just making that happen and a lot of people in the government are very glad to see it happen.
Speaker 6: I think it's really important to recognize every single person around this table that's embedded within an agency is supporting that agency whether they're working on systems or working through people. We are encountering droves of government employees who are missionaries not mercenaries who are actually here serving because they believe in what they're doing they want to do things well. We are trying to empower them and they feel empowered now to ask the question of why, why aren't we doing this, what else can we be doing, how can we fix this and I think agency by agency it is filled with exceptional government employees right and we when we give them the tools, when we give them the systems and we leave behind systems to help them do their jobs better that's the permanent change right and they're embracing that not because it's new to them it's because it's something they've always wanted to do but for the first time ever we're giving them the tools and the collaboration to be able to do that.
Speaker 0: It's a very important message. That message needs to get out a lot more I'm so glad you said that.
Speaker 6: We have exceptional people at all of our agencies, exceptional. I mean they do a thankless job and they work incredibly hard.
Speaker 0: I love to hear how collaborative it is with these people in these agencies and it's not all conflict. Sometimes in the media, always hear about conflict and you guys are considered these ruthless suits that come in and scare people, but
Speaker 6: it's Conflict is the exception.
Speaker 1: Is conflict, but that is the exception. It's actually true of history in general. You know, there's people study the wars a lot, but actually most of the time there wasn't war.
Speaker 0: It's just not as exciting.
Speaker 1: It's just not as exciting. Right. Exactly.
Speaker 0: Well, the TV guys, we like conflict, but in this case, we love the collaboration. So thank you guys. Thanks for allowing me this access in here. You guys are just really, really bright, young, smart patriots. And you have a great team.
And thank you, Elon, for everything you've done for the country. We really appreciate it. We're eternally grateful.
Speaker 1: You're welcome. Thank you.
Speaker 0: Thank you.
@amuse - @amuse
DOGE: Why is Senator Sheldon Whitehouse such a huge critic of DOGE and Elon Musk? Turns out he's been funneling millions to an NGO that pays his wife millions. His wife isn't paid by just one government funded NGO but two including the Atlantic Council. The corruption is deep.
@DOGE__news - (news) DOGE
Is it time for DOGE to audit Pelosi? https://t.co/cFIof551dT
Video Transcript AI Summary
The devil deals hard in Georgia, where hell's broke loose. A fiddle contest determines one's fate. Victory brings a shiny gold fiddle, but defeat means the devil claims your soul.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Draws up your bow and play your fiddle hard because hell's broke loose in Georgia and the devil deals it hard. And if you win, you'll get the shiny fiddle made of gold. But if you lose, the devil gets your soul.
reSee.it AI Summary
I went live from the Capitol with Rep. Tim Burchett, who strongly criticized Joe Biden's team for allegedly profiting from pardons, questioning how he could manage 8,000 files. The atmosphere is buzzing with a great lineup of guests, and the chat is open for discussion.
@bennyjohnson - Benny Johnson
🚨Rep. Tim Burchett doubles down LIVE from the Capitol saying Joe Biden's team was getting rich off of selling pardons: "Had to be. 8,000 freaking pardons? He couldn't even remember what he had for breakfast, but reviewed 8,000 files? Gimme a break. This is so shady." https://t.co/HtsM51Kxhg
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims the U.S. has given close to $5 billion to the Taliban via NGOs, and this continues. They allege this money cycles back to Washington, with a paper trail that Elon Musk has alluded to. The speaker believes USAID money goes "almost a %" right back to Democrat campaign coffers, with some Republicans also possibly benefiting. They state that Republican leadership is upset about these claims but acknowledges their truth. The speaker also questions how Joe Biden could have reviewed 8,000 pardon files, suggesting "payola" and shadiness in Washington D.C., particularly across various departments.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Almost a thousand NGOs, nongovernment organizations working out of Afghanistan. I had Marco Rubio in committee, and I asked him. We're getting we're giving the Taliban forty this is just an example. 40,000,000 a week. Two years I've been working on this.
I got a freaking memo from the dadgum state department, and they're no friends of mine. They're no friends of this country. It's that's the deep state there ever was one. They have they've told us that they we've given them close to $5,000,000,000, and we're still doing it because it goes to the NGOs. The democrats fought that amendment that we added NGOs into the bill.
Why? Because there's a thousand NGOs and you know good and well that that money's coming right back to Washington. That's what Elon told us. Paper trail runs right back. Now can I find it?
No. I don't have access to those kind of computers, but that's why they're squealing. They're squealing about it.
Speaker 1: So squealing about USAID cuts, you're saying that our suspicions are confirmed that the money that's spent at USAID goes right back at the democrat campaign coffers?
Speaker 0: Almost a %. Almost a %. There's still some republicans. I think if if they are, you know, that's why they leadership, they sent somebody to see me, they sent my buddy and he sits beside me, 10 man's home, the chairman, they're kind of upset what you said and, you know, go through all this stuff. And I said, you know, it's the truth, right?
He goes, well, yeah, we know it's the truth, but you just can't keep saying it. And I keep saying it. So that's why I always tell people I'm not suicidal. You made a lot
Speaker 1: of news on our show saying that you believe that there could have been some real payola with some of bipartisan.
Speaker 0: 8,000 pardons. I said 2,000. It's come out. Somebody said something about Eight thousand. Eight thousand freaking pardons.
You think Joe Joe couldn't remember what he'd had for breakfast. He couldn't remember what the dadgum bathroom was. And and and he's he he he reviewed 8,000 files on pardons. Give me a freaking break. This is so shady, and it just it's just Washington DC.
It it happens every day. That's the thing. It happens all the time. But with Trump in there, we're focusing on some of this stuff. Yeah.
And it it every department every every department is suspect. And, you know, you just can't get past it.
@bennyjohnson - Benny Johnson
We are currently LIVE at the Capitol from Rep. Tim Burchett’s office. An absolutely stacked lineup of guests. Chat is on 🔥 Get in here 👉🏻 https://youtube.com/live/CIZ4SgEdRMg