TruthArchive.ai - Related Post Feed
@CitizenFreePres - Citizen Free Press
Tucker Carlson: "Zelensky is a dangerous authoritarian who has used $100 billion in US tax dollars to erect a one-party police state in Ukraine." https://t.co/YqW3Tdd5K8
Video Transcript AI Summary
Zelensky's actions in Ukraine reveal a troubling authoritarianism, as he has banned opposition parties, shut down critical media, and arrested political opponents. Recently, he announced plans to ban the Ukrainian Orthodox Church, claiming it poses a threat due to its ties to Russia, despite its denunciation of the invasion. This move has been largely ignored or excused by U.S. leaders and media, who continue to support Zelensky as a defender of freedom. However, the reality is that Ukrainians face severe restrictions on their rights, including worship and political expression. The Ukrainian government is prioritizing its power over democratic principles, raising questions about the true nature of the support being given to them by the West.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Whatever you think of the war in Ukraine, it is pretty clear that Zelensky has no interest in freedom and democracy. In fact, Zelensky is far closer to Lenin than to George Washington. He's a dictator. He's a dangerous authoritarian who has used a 100,000,000,000 in US tax dollars to erect a 1 party police state in Ukraine, and that's not an overstatement. Over the past year, Zelensky has banned opposition parties.
He shut down critical media by force. He's arrested his political opponents. He has sent soldiers into churches. Zelenskyy secret police have raided monasteries across Ukraine. Even a convent full of nuns and arrested dozens of priests for no justifiable reason whatsoever and in clear violation of the Ukrainian constitution, which no longer matters.
And in the face of this, the Biden administration has said nothing, not one word. Instead, they just continue to push to send Zelensky more tax dollars. So naturally, Zelensky has become much bolder. Why wouldn't he? Last week, he announced his plan to ban an entire religion, the Ukrainian Orthodox Church, and to seize its property all for being insufficiently loyal to his regime.
And he said it out loud. Watch this.
Speaker 1: We have to create such conditions when any people dependent on the country aggressor won't be able to manipulate Ukrainians and weaken Ukraine from within. 1st, the National Security and Defense Council instructed the government to submit to the Verhobnara, a draft law on making it impossible for religious organizations affiliated with centers of influence in the Russian Federation to operate in Ukraine.
Speaker 0: A free country does not ban a major religion just because it's not fully on board with the political program of the people running the country. But Zelensky is doing that, and his cabinet is now devising ways to punish Christians for practicing their banned ancient religion in Ukraine. Quote, personal economic and restrictive sanctions will be applied to any Christian caught worshiping in unapproved ways. Now the Ukrainian Orthodox Church is more than a 1000 years old. With the full backing of the Joe Biden administration in the US Congress, Zelensky has decided to ban it.
So here's the response of 1 bishop to the news. You're not allowed to send soldiers into churches. You're not allowed to arrest dozens of priests because they refuse to bow before you. You're not allowed to ban whole religions. So most of the US media, most have just ignored this.
Some have made excuses for it. Oh, he has to do this because there's a war, but there's no justification for this whatsoever. The Ukrainian Orthodox Church is not Russian. It's Ukrainian. It has no connection to the Putin government.
It is in fact officially denounced the Russian invasion of Ukraine. So once again, there is no justification for destroying and banning this church. And yet Zelensky's many celebrity backers in the west have said nothing about it, and they should know better. In May, George w Bush, the great defender of Christendom, met with Zelensky on a Zoom call and afterward described him as the Winston Churchill of our time, a man who should be praised for his, quote, commitment to liberty. So where's George w Bush on this question now that his friend, the George Washington of Ukraine, has banned a form of Christianity in that country?
Well, George w Bush has been silent as well. So have many purportedly Christian members of congress. They're backing as Zelensky no matter how many Christians he arrests, no matter how many churches he seizes. To the Ukrainian people, you can expect the congress to to be there with you in terms of supporting your efforts to maintain your freedom.
Speaker 2: Everything that we can do, to be helpful to them as they fight for as they fight for their freedom.
Speaker 0: I think the history of the 21st century turns on how fiercely we defend freedom in Ukraine.
Speaker 3: We will continue to provide military equipment so that Ukraine can defend its territory and its freedom. United States will continue our unwavering support for Ukraine as it defends its freedom.
Speaker 0: And let's get the job done so that we can save lives in Ukraine and defend the cause of freedom.
Speaker 4: The free world had no choice. America could not stand by. The American people did what they always have done, defend freedom around the world.
Speaker 0: Every single person you just watched has campaigned many to make a habit of campaigning Lindsey Graham, ladies and gentlemen, in Christian churches in the United States. Well, a single Christian leader say anything to them about this? You are funding the destruction of Christianity in Ukraine? Oh, but it's the cause of freedom. Really?
The reality is that Ukrainians cannot listen to media outlets that criticize the Zelensky government because they've been banned. They cannot play music from Russian singers. No. This is not in Taliban controlled Afghanistan. This is in the democracy of Ukraine that we support.
They can't play music for Russian singers. They can't vote for an opposition party because they've all been shut down. And now their churches are being raided and their priests arrested. So the fact that our leaders are calling this freedom tells you a lot about what they're planning here. Of course, why would you defend this?
Because you approve of it. For its part, Ukraine's defense ministry has stopped pretending this is about freedom. They're just happy they're getting paid, and they're finally crushing any opposition in their own country.
reSee.it AI Summary
In a shocking revelation, a top Ukrainian official claims that Mitch McConnell received $89 million in kickbacks, while Chuck Schumer had $66 million of our tax dollars funneled into his pocket. This photo exposes the corruption at the highest levels of power. It's time to hold them accountable. #Treason #Corruption
@Libertarians4DT - The Trumpertarian
BREAKING: THE 155 MILLION DOLLAR PHOTO... Mitch McConnell got $89 million in kickbacks while Chuck Schumer had $66 million of our tax dollars to Ukraine laundered into his pocketbook, says top Ukrainian official. They were at the top of the #UkraineList. The uni-party summed up in a photo... This is what treason looks like. LOCK THEM ALL UP.
@liz_churchill10 - Liz Churchill
How’s it possible to give Ukraine more money from destitute Tax Payers when they refuse to account for the first $150B+? Did anyone sort out the allegations of Child-sex Trafficking in Ukraine as reported by Russian Soldiers or any habits that Zelensky may have? https://t.co/OZbMQX6DTt
Video Transcript AI Summary
A group of kids, aged three to six, played together on the second floor. They talked about bringing a rabbit to the farm and taking its organs. At first, it seemed unbelievable until they saw it with their own eyes.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Сыграла маленьких от трех до 6 и при именно этот пункт там их раз на этаже на вторую не нужен материал и просто хранить и вот эти ребята говорили как будто они как как будто скот звали пор летом кролика да привозили как будто какая-то ферма имплант забираю органы слышал об этом не верил пока своими глазами не увидишь не поймешь а когда увидишь
@therealmrbench - sonofabench
In case you were wondering how the Billions of our tax dollars are being spent in Zelenskyy Ukraine. Homeless and drug addicted in our streets, but Ukraine gets billions. And politicians get millions in kickbacks https://t.co/38otNkuCBT
Video Transcript AI Summary
The American people should be proud of their support for Ukraine. We will continue supplying Ukraine with critical weapons and equipment, including $200 million that I just approved. However, without additional funding, our ability to help Ukraine respond to urgent demands is coming to an end. We need Ukraine to fix its broken immigration system, and Congress needs to do the same at home. Holding Ukraine funding hostage to push a partisan agenda on the border is not the solution. We need real solutions.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: American people, Cambian, should be incredibly proud of the part they played in supporting Ukraine's success. We'll continue to supply Ukraine with critical weapons and and equipment as long as we can, including $200,000,000 I just approved today in critical needed equipment. But without supplemental funding, We're rapidly coming to an end of our ability to help Ukraine respond to the urgent operational demands that it has. And I have repeatedly made clear from our first day in office. We also need Ukraine to make changes to fix the broken immigration system here.
We also need Congress to make the changes to fix the broken immigration system here at home. Holding Ukraine funding hostage in an attempt to force through an dream republican partisan agenda on the border is not how it works. We need real solutions.
@TuckerCarlson - Tucker Carlson
When US senators get together in private, do any of them ever admit that sending half a trillion dollars to Ukrainian oligarchs is a bad idea? As it turns out, no they don’t. JD Vance explains. https://t.co/4GCORwdGVc
Video Transcript AI Summary
The war in Ukraine is in a destructive phase, with Russia having the advantage. The Biden administration is now reducing military funding for Ukraine, aiming for the country to eventually stand on its own. However, the idea of Ukraine rebuilding its industrial base seems unrealistic. JD Vance, a US senator, pointed out Ukraine's corruption and questioned the massive financial support it receives. He estimated that the war could cost the US around $500 billion, with no significant progress made. Ukraine's population has decreased, and the country relies on welfare from the US and NATO. Vance criticized the notion that NATO would cover the expenses, as it is unlikely.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The war in Ukraine has officially entered its pointlessly destructive phase. And, of course, anything that is pointlessly destructive is by definition evil, but that's where we are. Ukraine can't win. Russia has a much larger population and much deeper industrial capacity. That was obvious within hours of the outbreak of the war, And it's undeniable now.
That leaves the Biden administration in a very strange place because, of course, Joe Biden has pledged Your support, your money, potentially your children, to Zelensky for quote as long as it takes. But that doesn't make any sense. United States has no more money to give Ukraine or anyone else. And so That promise has to be walked back and slowly it is being walked back. So the State Department spokesman the other day was asked, How long do we support Ukraine, and what does that support look like?
And he said, well, actually, we're gonna start giving Zelensky less money. Here it is.
Speaker 1: We have always made clear that we want Ukraine to be an independent country, and that means that can stand on, that can stand on its own 2 feet. We will continue to support Ukraine. It is the policy of the United States as it takes? As long as it takes. That does not mean that we are gonna continue to Support them at the same level of military funding that we did in, 2022 and 2023.
We don't think that should be necessary because the goal is To ultimately transition Ukraine, to use the language that you, repeated back, to to stand on its own feet and to help Ukraine build its own industrial base and its own military industrial base so it can both finance and build and acquire, munitions, on its own. But we are not there yet. And that is why it is so critical that Congress passed the supplemental funding bill because we are not yet at the point where Ukraine can defend itself just based on its own.
Speaker 0: Do you see that? It's almost worth watching that twice. Notice that he looks down, which is what you do when you're lying, which of course he is. Here's what's not a lie. And Crane's gonna rebuild its industrial base.
Really? An entire generation has been slaughtered. The country is a wreck. How is that going to happen? Oh well BlackRock will rebuild its industrial debates and lots of other donors to the Democratic Party that's the real point of course.
So this is super obvious to anyone who's watching. The weird thing is no one in Washington is saying it out loud, except really for 1 US senator from the state of Ohio called JD Vance. And recently he pointed out what has been again obvious for 2 years now that Ukraine is the most corrupt country in Europe, nobody denies That except in this country and that Zelensky whatever his merits is probably not the guy you should send 100 of 1,000,000,000 of dollars to. Well his colleagues went crazy. They love Zelensky.
They love him on a personal level. These are people with very weird sex lives who are transferring in some cases some of their Personal desires on to Zelensky that adorable little bear. So they got mad at JD Vance for saying that. Watch this clip and ask yourself does JD Vance deserve that rage or was he telling the truth?
Speaker 2: We're getting easily a half a $1,000,000,000 in the whole for the Ukraine conflict by the time this is done and Steve at the very same time you have people in this town saying we need to cut Social Security. There are people who would cut Social Security throw our grandparents into poverty. Why? So that one of the Zelensky's ministers can buy a bigger yacht. Kiss my ass Steve it's not happening.
Speaker 0: So they hated when he said that. In fact one of his colleagues who gets along with apparently pretty well immediately denounced that as bullshit, But of course didn't in any way rebut it and of course when they get mad it's usually because you're telling the truth. We thought we would ask J. D. Vance directly.
Senator Vance Joins us now. We're happy he is. Senator, thanks so much for coming on. So the most striking thing about that exchange you had Was the number that you put the price tag that you threw out there. Can you just slowly explain what you think this war will cost the United States all in?
Speaker 2: Yeah. So, of course, Tucker, it's impossible to say because every single day this goes on, we we spend more money. Not just the money that's obvious and and meets the headlines, But also the stuff that we're putting ourselves all in for for rebuilding costs and so forth. So let me just give you a sense of of what I mean here. The headline number of what we spent on Ukraine is a $120,000,000,000.
The Biden administration is asking for another $61,000,000,000, and a lot of senate, even Republicans seem hell bent On giving him that money, that's a $180,000,000,000 just right there. Now what that doesn't include is if this thing goes on for a year or 2 beyond that, It also doesn't include what's called presidential drawdown authority, where let's say, Joe Biden gives weapons that were manufactured in the United States or somewhere else, Gives them to to to Zelensky. They can use weird accounting gimmicks to understate how many resources have actually been given. So If we've given a $120,000,000,000 at a headline number thus far, it's probably closer to a 150 or even a $160,000,000,000. That is partially a guess, but it's an informed guess.
The other thing, Tucker, is that we we're gonna we we've already told people in no uncertain terms that we're gonna rebuild this Country, you hear things like a Marshall Plan for Ukraine, whether it's implemented by BlackRock or overseen by BlackRock. We're talking about an an Additional 200, 300, maybe $400,000,000,000, to rebuild this country. Already, Tucker, the Ukrainians are unable to pay their pensioners. They're critical Parts of the Ukrainian state, you know, things like fixing the roads, ambulance services, pension provisions that the Ukrainians can't provide for themselves at this point. So When you when you take this all in, Tucker, I I really think that even if the war ended, let's say, 6 months from now, the all in cost of the American tax spare is gonna be about a half a $1,000,000,000,000.
Again, that it is that is a guess, but it's an informed guess based on what we've already spent and what we might be expected to spend in the future. It's a catastrophic sum of money. When you think about Tucker, what it's accomplished, which is that we basically turned Ukraine into a rump And this can't be overstated. The goal here was always to turn Ukraine into an independent ally They could stand against the Russian. Now set to the side whether, this is this is a goal worth spending $500,000,000,000 for.
I don't think that it is, but but even if you assume that goal as the policy of the United States of America, we have not accomplished anything close to it. The country has gone from about 40,000,000 people to 28,000,000 people. A ton of prime age men. I mean, men in the in the prime of their lives here, have been killed or wounded or maimed. They'll never be functional people ever again, and that is what we have accomplished It has become a rough state that will become a permanent welfare client of the United States of America and of NATO, but but I I I I I joke almost when I say that NATO is gonna pick up the tab here because we all know they won't.
@CitizenFreePres - Citizen Free Press
Tucker Carlson on X Ep. 74 just dropped: "The Ukrainian government canceled elections and killed an American journalist. Congress is about send them another $60 billion. J.D. Vance is trying to stop it." https://t.co/Wb2sRYuiwZ
Video Transcript AI Summary
Ukraine cannot win its war against Russia, even with extensive Western support. The ongoing conflict is leading to significant loss of life and economic degradation. Recently, the U.S. Senate proposed sending another $60 billion to Ukraine, despite its corrupt government and ongoing issues. There is a critical procedural vote that could potentially kill this legislation, and efforts are being made to sway Republican senators against it. This funding not only supports Ukraine in 2024 but also ties future presidential decisions, limiting diplomatic options. Many senators seem to believe prolonging the war serves Ukraine's interests, but this perspective overlooks the devastating impact on the Ukrainian population and distracts from pressing domestic issues.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It became very clear to anyone paying attention several months ago that Ukraine cannot win its war against Russia. The Ukrainian military will not be able, even with western backing 100 of 1,000,000,000 of dollars of it, to expel the Russian military from parts of Eastern Ukraine. Ukraine doesn't have the industrial capacity, neither does NATO or the United States, and it doesn't have the people. Russia has a 100,000,000 more in population than Ukraine does. And that means that further support from the West for the Ukrainian military only means more dead Ukrainians and a further degraded Western economy in the US and in Germany, particularly.
So it's not simply a fool's errand. It's self destruction. It's insane. It's cruel. It's abetting the killing of an entire generation of Ukrainians.
This is very obvious. No honest person at this point will deny it. And yet somehow the United States Senate, which is always several years behind reality and its perception just a few weeks ago decided to send another $60,000,000,000 to the Ukrainian government, which is both corrupt and authoritarian. They've canceled elections. They banned an entire Christian denomination, and then they killed an American journalist for noting any of this.
And yet, the United States Senate proposed under Mitch McConnell a plan to send another $60,000,000,000 to Ukraine. Well, imagine the surprise. Well, all rational people around the world to wake up this morning and discover this could actually happen. And so with that in mind, we thought it'd be worth talking to one of the very few Republican senators who's bothered to make the counter case, and that would be JD Vance of Ohio who joins us now from the United States. Senator, thanks so much for coming on.
If you wouldn't mind telling us where this legislation is right now, what you expect to happen, and what you think should happen.
Speaker 1: Yeah, Tucker. So there are 2 big things that will happen here. So tonight, we will clear a major procedural vote or we won't. So this is really the best opportunity tonight to kill this legislation. Encourage everybody to do everything that they can, contact everyone they can to ensure that we actually do kill the legislation.
It is very close. The Democrats have banded together with 17 Republicans. We only need 8 of those Republicans to flip their vote to kill this thing, and I think that we'll get at least 1, who will in fact flip their votes. So that that that's where it sits in the Senate. The second thing and frankly, the best opportunity we have to kill this is in the house, and that's part of what I'm trying to do is notify people about how bad this legislation is, so that after it clears the Senate, if it does, then it goes to the House and the House has a real opportunity to at least make it better, but hopefully kill it.
And I I wanna say just just a couple of things here, Tucker, that are extremely important to know about this legislation. Number 1, is that it sends $61,000,000,000 to Ukraine to fund, as you said, a hopeless war in Eastern Europe that will decimate the Ukrainian population even more than it's already been decimated. So it's a terrible terrible piece of legislation on the policy. The second thing I wanna say, Tucker, though, is that it doesn't just fund Ukraine in 2024, and this is the most important point. It actually funds Ukraine in 25 and 26.
Now, what's the problem with that? Say, for example, that we have a new president in 2025, that president would be handcuffed by the promises that we are making in law to Ukraine today. If you go back to to 2019, Tucker, to sort of give you a sense of why this matters. In 2019, the US House impeached then President Donald Trump on the theory that they had appropriated money to Ukraine and Donald Trump refused to send it to Ukraine. So if Trump is elected President again and become President on January of 2025, he will conduct diplomacy and if that diplomacy does not include sending additional 1,000,000,000 to Ukraine, there is a theoretical argument, a predicate, if you will, for impeaching Donald Trump because they have tried to tie his hands.
And the final point I'll make on this, Tucker, is that the Washington Post has already has already said, based on leaks from inside the intel community, the purpose of this legislation is to tie a future President Trump's hands. We're not just sending 1,000,000,000 to Ukraine in 2024, we're trying to make it impossible for the next president to conduct diplomacy on his terms. It's anti democratic and it will lead to endless war in the all over the world.
Speaker 0: So the political calculation behind this seems incredibly dark, so does the humanitarian effect. I noticed that no one on Capitol Hill seems interested in finding out how many have died in this war. Reliable estimates in the area, these are not partisan, are that about 400,000 Ukrainians have died. That's about as many Americans has died in the entire second World War over the entire duration, and it's, of course, a much smaller country. So how do senators, Republican senators, get away with saying we're doing this on behalf of Ukrainian people, on behalf of democracy when it's destroying an entire generation and it's not a democracy?
Like, what's the thinking here?
Speaker 1: Well, Tucker, they bought into the propaganda that what is in the best interest of Ukraine is to prolong this war. And so Zelensky comes to Washington. You know, he's tougher than a lot of them are, and I think they get, you know, a a little bit of excitement from that. And Zelensky tells them a story that his war is in the best interest of the whole of Ukraine. Now never mind that there are people within Ukraine protesting the draft, never mind that the average age of a soldier there is pushing 45 years old, and never mind that the 650,000 wealthiest Ukrainians left the country at the beginning of the war, they didn't stay and fight.
So the idea that this is unanimously supported by the Ukrainian population is, of course, preposterous and absurd. No one believes it. But but here's here's the really crazy and I and I think ultimately the very cynical thing that's going on, Tucker, is that everyone knows that this war will lead to the destruction of Ukraine. I've had conversations with democratic colleagues where they get this sort of dark look in their eyes and they say, effectively, that they wanna fight Russia to the last Ukrainian drop of blood. I I I think if you really ask these guys, they recognize that this is not in the best interest of Ukraine.
This is fundamentally in the interest of military contractors and people who think that America's most pressing challenge is to defeat the Russians. Of course, that's not a preoccupation that I share. I don't think Russia should have invaded, Tucker, but I also think that we gotta be much more focused on more pressing problems, like the demographic collapse of the United States, like the open borders, and like what's going on in East Asia. So it's a massive campaign, Tucker, to distract people from the real problems in the world and the real problems that exist in this country.
Speaker 0: And underlying it all, as you just said, is is an impulse that's that's indefensible and I think deeply immoral. So I I'm so grateful for you having the courage to talk about this in public, and I and I hope common sense in your position prevails. Senator, JD Vance of Ohio. Thank you. Free speech is bigger than any one person or any one organization.
Societies are defined by what they will not permit. Local blockchain is the total inversion of virtue.
@sues86453 - Sue Knows Best
No more money to Ukraine! These focking losers want to send another 8 billion with zero oversight! https://t.co/B0Tksp2lUX
Video Transcript AI Summary
We have an abundance of money for funding war machinery and foreign aid, like $8 billion to Ukraine. We also support Ukrainian businesses and banks with taxpayer funds. Humanitarian aid often ends up in corrupt hands due to lack of oversight.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Good lord. When it comes to funding the machinery of war, we have money. We have money. We have money that we couldn't possibly dream of. We can run the presses indefinitely if it's going to go overseas.
If we're going to be paying foreign governments, Why? We've got enough money apparently to send $8,000,000,000 direct to the Treasury of Ukraine. My goodness, we have enough money to make 100 of 1,000,000 of dollars of our taxpayer funds available to the private sector in Ukraine. We are now literally funding their businesses, their banks, Lord knows what. Pensions.
We've got enough money for so called humanitarian aid that gets funneled away from, siphoned off into any manner of corrupt uses. We won't know because we don't have a special inspector general to oversee this money, but that's a different story. Oh, no. We've got plenty of money.
reSee.it AI Summary
Before we send more money to Ukraine, @SpeakerJohnson, can we get answers on why Gonzalo Lira was killed? He was the American journalist who said dirty American politicians work with dirty Ukrainian politicians to use Ukraine as their unsavory piggy bank!!!
@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense
Before we go off sending more money to Ukraine @SpeakerJohnson, can we get some answers on why Gonzalo Lira was killed?? He was the American journalist who said dirty American politicians work with Dirty Ukrainian politicians to use Ukraine as their unsavory piggy bank!!!??? https://t.co/GE93j3zxXx
@amuse - @amuse
Ukrainian whistleblower is claiming that McConnell and Schumer both got massive kickbacks from Zelensky. h/t @JDunlap1974 https://t.co/9oD96x4Glu
@JoeyMannarinoUS - Joey Mannarino
Zelenskyy just essentially endorsed Kamala in Pennsylvania while with Josh Shapiro autographing ammunition. He called Trump and Vance “radical”. He also said Trump has no idea how to end the war. How is this not some sort of violation from a man who we are funding? https://t.co/HTfM9VkPsz
@RealAlexJones - Alex Jones
Breaking: Zelensky Turns on Democrat Deep State, Says 58% of Ukraine War/Aid Funds Stolen by Washington Insiders -- Must-Watch & Share Feed! https://t.co/YZzAGwvKm0
reSee.it AI Summary
Keith Kellogg, Trump’s Special Envoy for Ukraine and Russia, confirmed that an audit is underway to track the billions sent to Ukraine amid concerns raised by President Zelensky, who admitted uncertainty about the whereabouts of $100 billion. Kellogg noted that inspector generals have been deployed in both Ukraine and the U.S. to oversee the funds. Additionally, he expressed support for holding elections in Ukraine. In response, another user referenced previous warnings about the situation from five years ago.
@ShadowofEzra - Shadow of Ezra
Trump’s Special Envoy for Ukraine and Russia, Keith Kellogg, has confirmed that an audit is underway to track the billions sent to Ukraine for the war. This comes after Zelensky admitted he had no idea where $100 billion had gone. Kellogg revealed that the Trump administration has deployed inspector generals both in Ukraine and the U.S. to monitor the funds. Kellogg also wants an election to be held in Ukraine.
@TheIntelSCIF - The SCIF
@ShadowofEzra 5 years ago, you were told. You can't make this stuff up. https://t.co/YxbbunNkmP
@TheIntelSCIF - The SCIF
5 year delta hit exposing USAID on 2/6/2020. Exactly what's transpiring at this moment in time. How many more times before it's not considered a coincidence? You just can't make this stuff up, especially 5 years in advance. https://t.co/31Xlh3OZeN
@Crazymoments01 - Crazy Moments
@WallStreetApes Senator Kennedy on what DOGE found USAID spent money on. https://t.co/LDOtKolmyy
Video Transcript AI Summary
USAID, with 10,000 employees and a $40 billion annual budget, has drawn scrutiny for its spending. Investigations revealed funding for electric vehicles in Vietnam, a transgender clinic in India, and $1.5 million to a Serbian LGBTQ group for diversity initiatives. A Middle East Forum study showed $164 million spent on radical organizations globally, including $122 million to groups linked to terrorist organizations. Millions were also directed to Hamas-controlled organizations in Gaza, groups calling for the removal of Jews, and projects in Guatemala for sex changes. Other questionable expenditures include funding for a Sesame Street show in Iraq, combating misinformation in Kazakhstan, and providing meals to a group linked to Al-Qaeda. Additional examples include funding LGBT advocacy in Jamaica and projects in Cuba, Belarus, and Macedonia. These findings raise concerns about how taxpayer money is allocated.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: He found that the USAID has 10,000 people. 10,000 people, employees. And every year, they give away $40,000,000,000. Mister Musk, also found and I'm not saying that that all of this money is wasteful. I'm not.
Some of this money, I'm sure, does some good. That's why secretary Rubio is gonna revamp the the the department to separate the good from the bad. But this is the kind of stuff Mr. Musk found. He he found that the USAID, gave money to support electric vehicles in Vietnam.
Our money, taxpayer money. He found that, USAID gave money to a transgender clinic in India. I didn't know that. I bet the American people didn't know that. He found that, USAID gave $1,500,000 to a Serbian LB LGBTQ group called Grupa.
I probably mispronounced that. My apologies. Anyway, they got $1,500,000 to quote, advance diversity, equity, inclusion in Serbia's workplaces and business community. What else did mister Musk found that my colleagues don't wanna talk about? Well, he he reviewed a study and then went and checked it.
The study was done by the Middle East Forum. They found that USAID spent $164,000,000 to support radical organizations about around the world. We're not talking cub scout troops here. We're talking about radical organizations around the world. They gave a hundred and $22,000,000 of that to groups aligned with foreign terrorist organizations.
Our taxpayer money. According to this report in mister Musk, the USAID has given millions of dollars to, quote, organizations in Gaza controlled by Hamas. Why why why aren't my colleagues talking about that? Recipients of the money they found have, quote, called for their lands to be cleansed from the impurity of Jews. That's what we're getting with foreign aid too.
What else? I'm not gonna spend my whole time talking about this, but nobody else is talking about it. They're just talking about the process and mister Musk, and he's a mean guy, and he shouldn't be looking at our spending. Well, he is. And I kinda find that I kinda find what he's found out interesting.
He found that we gave $2,000,000, USAID did, for sex changes in Guatemala. He found that we gave $20,000,000 to produce a new Sesame Street show in Iraq. He found that we, we gave $4,500,000 of taxpayer money to combat miss disinformation in Kazakhstan. He found that we gave $10,000,000, USAID did, of meals to an Al Qaeda linked terrorist group called the Nusra Front. Mister Musk found that we gave $7,900,000 of taxpayer money to a project that would teach Sri Lankan journalists to avoid binary gendered language.
We took the USAID took $8,000,000 and gave it to a bunch of journalists in Sri Lanka to teach them how to avoid binary gendered language. I don't know what the hell binary gendered language is. I think I do. You think most taxpayers would support that? Why are we talking about that?
The USAID gave $1,500,000 to promote LGBT advocacy in Jamaica. They gave $1,500,000 to rebuild the Cuban media ecosystem. They gave $1,500,000 for, quote, art for inclusion of people with disabilities in Belarus. Another $3,900,000 for LGBT causes in Macedonia.
reSee.it AI Summary
I see my Democratic colleagues upset about Elon Musk and DOGE, but they’re missing the bigger picture. Musk has uncovered significant issues, like the massive spending at USAID, which amounts to hundreds of millions, possibly billions, that they should be addressing instead.
@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat
Sen. John Kennedy: Democrats Critical of DOGE Are Not Talking About What Elon Musk Is ‘Finding’ "A lot of my Democratic colleagues and members of the tofu crowd are very upset and screaming like Musk stole their dog. But they are not talking about what Mr. Musk is finding. Just at the USAID, he found hundreds of millions, maybe billions of dollars of spending p*rn."
Video Transcript AI Summary
Senator John Kennedy expressed his appreciation for the current president's willingness to engage with the press, contrasting it with the previous administration. He emphasized the importance of reviewing government spending, highlighting concerns over waste in Medicaid. Kennedy noted that while Medicaid spending is around a trillion dollars annually, many able-bodied individuals are on the program. He proposed a bill requiring those aged 18 to 55, who are not disabled and have no minor children, to work at least 20 hours a week, which could save about $100 billion over ten years. He argued that work is not only financially beneficial but also morally important, as these programs should help individuals transition back to self-sufficiency.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: With that, we bring in Louisiana Republican senator John Kennedy. Senator, always good to have you with us. What was your reaction as you watch this sort of longer than usual freewheeling, press conference with these two foreign leaders?
Speaker 1: Well, not number one. I find it refreshing after four years, where our president wouldn't wouldn't talk to anyone. Number two, I was paying especially close attention to what the president had to say about reviewing spending. I think it would be fair to say that president Trump has dug in like a tick. He's gonna continue.
He ran on this issue. He said if if you elect me president, I'm gonna review the spending. Now I don't know how you review the spending without reviewing the spending. No no no fair minded person can doubt that the president of The United States has the authority to review the spending in the Executive Branch. He's, he's delegated that authority to Elon Musk.
A lot of my Democratic colleagues and most of the members of the tofu crowd are very upset. They're screaming like Musk stole their dog or something. But one thing they're not talking about is, is what Mr. Musk is finding. I mean, just at the USAID, he found hundreds of millions, maybe billions of dollars worth of of spending porn.
Speaker 0: Senator, let me ask you something. That If I may, you wrote a piece about Medicaid saying that there is a ton of waste in Medicaid. And you heard president Trump just moments ago. He said we're not gonna touch Social Security, but he said that there are a lot of, bad people who shouldn't be on the list, something to that effect when it comes to Medicaid. What did you find and write about this week with regard to
Speaker 1: that? The American people are the most generous people in the world. If you're If you're hungry, we'll feed you. If you're homeless, we'll house you. If you're too poor to be sick, we'll pay for your doctor.
But all of it costs money. We're spending about a trillion dollars a year on Medicaid. President Biden increased it by about 40%. We estimate that there are between ten and thirty million people on Medicaid who are perfectly able to work. I've got a bill that says if you're between 18 and 55, five, you're not disabled, you don't have any minor kids at home, so we're not talking about a mother with a sick child in her arms.
You you've gotta work twenty hours a week. That'll save us, according to the CBO, about a hundred billion dollars over ten years.
Speaker 0: That yeah. Right there.
Speaker 1: It's not just about the money. It's not just about the money. There's a moral principle. If you can work, you should work. These programs were not meant to be parking lots.
They were meant to be bridges. And for some people, not everybody on Medicaid, but for some people, the best way to to get back on your feet is to get off your ass.
Speaker 0: Well, well put. And, the the piece that you were was very interesting, and the idea is that if you are able-bodied and you're accepting Medicaid, you should be working as well, gainfully employed. Yep. And, it's an idea that I think would be common sense to a lot of people. You also pointed out the psychological benefits of of going to work and having a job and that that is what pulls people out of situations where they need this kind of aid.
Interesting piece and senator, thank you very much. It's always good to have you with us. Thank you, sir.
Speaker 1: Thank you, Mark.
@CitizenFreePres - Citizen Free Press
KAROLINE LEAVITT BRINGS THE DOGE RECEIPTS. Bootlicker democrat media hates talking about government waste. https://t.co/isqiCbdYHE
Video Transcript AI Summary
I welcome Elon Musk to the briefing room, as he provided great insights in the Oval Office yesterday, speaking in layman's terms. There is no lack of transparency with Doge. Trump and Musk are transparent about Doge's work, with an active X account and website posting contract receipts and stopped payments.
Before Musk, an unnamed bureaucrat handled government efficiency. Musk, now highly scrutinized, provides great access. We're happy to provide receipts and are not hiding anything.
Here are screenshots of contracts Doge found, like a $36,000 DEI contract for US citizenship and immigration services, a $3,400,000 DEI contract, and $57,000 for climate change in Sri Lanka. Doge identifies these line items daily. We're transparent about Doge's work, including tweets about the Federal Employee Retirement System in Pennsylvania. We provide daily transparency and accessibility.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Yesterday, gave us some information on that. We're just wondering if there's some proof evidence. Is the White House willing to share Mhmm. Evidence of those fraud claims, or can Elon Musk come to the briefing room and share material evidence of what he's talking about?
Speaker 1: Sure. I would love for Elon Musk to come to the briefing room. That's why we had him go to the Oval Office yesterday, where I think he provided great answers. He was speaking in layman's terms, speaking common sense, to all of you in the media, but also to Americans at home. But I would say especially to all of you in the media because I think it's a real fallacy, that there's this alleged lack of transparency when it comes to Doge.
President Trump and Elon Musk have been incredibly transparent on what Doge is doing. There is an x account with the doge handle. They are tweeting out what they are doing on a daily basis. They have a website where they are posting the receipts of the contracts that they are reviewing and the payments that they have stopped, from going out the door. The secretaries of of our departments have stopped from going out the door.
And I would also say that before it was Elon Musk, making our government efficient and accountable, it was some unnamed bureaucrat that none of you knew. I Elon Musk is, the richest man in the world. He's also now one of the most highly scrutinized men in the world alongside president Trump because of what he's doing and the access that he is allowing. So there's great transparency. As for the actual receipts, we are happy to provide them, and I actually brought some today because all of you know I love to bring the receipts.
We have contracts upon contracts that we can send and provide this information to you. Let me be very clear. We are not trying to hide anything. We have been incredibly transparent, and we will continue to be. These are screenshots of contracts that Doge found across our government.
This is a DEI contract, $36,000 for US citizenship and immigration services. That is against the president's policies and his America First agenda. This is a $3,400,000 contract, a council for inclusive innovation, at the US Patent and Trademark Office, Department of Commerce, another DEI contract that DOGE identified. I can continue to go through these. Oh, I love this one.
50 seven thousand bucks for climate change in Sri Lanka. What is this doing to continue the interest of the American people? Absolutely nothing. These are the line items across the federal government that DOGE is identifying daily. They're moving very fast.
There's a lot of paper that we can show you, but we're happy to do it. This administration has been more than transparent about what DOGE is doing. And here's one of their tweets that they posted about the mine. I believe this is in Pennsylvania where the Federal Employee Retirement System is being processed. Did anybody know this was even happening in our country before Elon Musk talked about it in the Oval Office yesterday?
A lot of Americans didn't. So we are providing transparency and accessibility on a daily basis when it comes to Doge.
reSee.it AI Summary
Sen. Amy Klobuchar criticized the Trump administration, stating that costs, chaos, and corruption have increased. In response, a user referenced a 2016 event where Klobuchar appeared with John McCain, Lindsey Graham, and the US Ambassador to Ukraine, suggesting her body language indicated she is "severely compromised." The user implied that her past associations raise questions about her integrity.
@TPostMillennial - The Post Millennial
Sen. Amy Klobuchar: "This is just another day in the Trump administration: costs are up, chaos is up, and yes, corruption is up." https://t.co/jjDr1ug195
@TheyCallMeTomO1 - Thomas O'Connor '62 baby, #GodBlessAmerica 🇺🇲
@TPostMillennial Here is Amy Klobuchar back in 2016 with John McCain, Lindsey Graham and the US Ambassador to Ukraine with Ukraine troops and the accepting some sort of award and a special envelope. . Watch her body language.. She is severely compromised and extremely compromised.. https://t.co/p5cWXCuME5
@RickyDoggin - A Man Of Memes
Zelensky is a Communist. That's why the Democrats love him. Listen to this: https://t.co/mvpIpHdD2W
Video Transcript AI Summary
I've banned another political opposition party that questioned my legitimacy, using the Department of Justice to seize their assets. This follows my 2022 ban on major opposition parties and TV channels linked to them, as well as taking control of Ukraine's largest television networks.
My presidential term ended on May 20th, but I canceled elections, citing martial law and suspending the constitution to remain in power. Some may say this is acceptable because we are at war. But, consider the implications if we accept this rationale. Leaders in other countries may use the same excuse to suspend constitutions and cancel elections, especially considering the conflicts with Russia and China.
They are already conditioning people to accept a dictatorship by using the Department of Justice to target political opponents.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Here is something that the political establishment and propaganda media don't want you to know. Ukraine's President Zelensky has just banned yet another political opposition party, one that questioned his legitimacy as president, and used Ukraine's Department Of Justice to mandate the seizure of this party's members' assets. Now this is just the latest of Zelenskyy's actions to do this sort of thing. He began banning major political opposition parties in 2022 when he also started banning TV channels that were associated with his political opponents. And he took over total control of Ukraine's largest television networks, now controlled by their government.
Zelensky's presidential term ended on May 20. He canceled elections in the name of martial law, suspending Ukraine's constitution so he could stay in power. Defenders of Zelensky will say, hey, Ukraine is in the middle of a war. They can't have elections. Just stop for a moment and think, if we accept that excuse or criteria for suspending the constitution and canceling elections, then we should presume that leaders in our own country and our own establishment media will also use the same excuse and rationale when they suspend our constitution and our elections, since we too are at war with Russia and China.
If you think this sounds crazy, look at what's already going on. They've already started conditioning us to accept a dictatorship by rationalizing their own use of our Department of Justice to target President Trump and other political enemies in their efforts to stay in power.
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe President Trump is correct in labeling Zelenskyy as a dictator, especially given the lack of elections in Ukraine. I'm frustrated about the $350 billion we've sent to Ukraine and question where that money has gone. The recent security agreement between Biden and Zelenskyy, committing us to support Ukraine for the next decade, raises concerns. I feel strongly that American politicians who support foreign interests are betraying our country, and I want our money back.
@Huberton - AJ Huber
President Trump is 100% RIGHT, Zelenskyy is a dictator. Where is all the $350 Billion money we've given to Ukrainians? Flashback: Traitor Joe Biden and Zelensky signed a new security agreement committing the US to financially support Ukraine for the next 10 years. Flashback: Warmonger dictator Zelenskyy Calls for the Creation of an ‘Army of Europe’ at the Munich Security Conference.
Video Transcript AI Summary
I truly believe the time has come for Europe to have its own military. The Armed Forces of Europe must be created. This isn't harder than standing firm against Russian attacks, which we've already done. It's not just about increasing defense spending as a GDP ratio. Money is needed, of course. But money alone won't stop an enemy assault. People and weapons don't come free, but it's not just about budgets. It's about people realizing they need to defend their own home.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Have talked about Europe that needs its own military, an army, an army of Europe. And I And I I really I really believe that time has come. The Armed Forces of Europe must be created. This is this is this is not harder than standing firm against Russian attacks as we have already done. But this is not just about increasing defense spending as a GDP ratio.
Money is needed, of course. Yes. But money alone will not stop an enemy assault. People and weapons don't come for free. But, again, it's not just about budgets.
It's about people realizing they need to defend their own own home.
Video Transcript AI Summary
We've given a lot of money, potentially $350 billion, to address this issue. To ensure fairness, we need to equalize our contributions with Europe, as they've given a smaller percentage, around $100 billion, compared to our $300 billion plus. It is more important for them because they are closer to the conflict, while we have an ocean separating us.
However, there's a lack of transparency regarding where this money is going. Despite giving hundreds of billions, I haven't seen any accounting of it. I want peace because I don't want to see any more people killed.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Is that we gave him. Well, we gave them, I believe, $350,000,000,000 but let's say it's something less than that, but it's, it's a lot. And we have to equalize with Europe because Europe has given us a given a very much smaller percentage than that. I think Europe has given a hundred billion and we've given, let's say, 300 plus, and it's more important for them than it is for us. We have an ocean in between, and they don't.
But where is all the money that's been given? Where is it going? And nobody I've never seen an accounting of it. We give hundreds of billions of dollars. I have I don't see any accounting.
So I want to see peace. Look, You know why I want? Because I don't want all these people killed anymore. I'm looking at people that
@Huberton - AJ Huber
@elonmusk - Elon Musk
Good question
@libsoftiktok - Libs of TikTok
Trump slams Zelensky and Biden era funding for the endless war. Why does the U.S. get the worst end of the deal? Europe’s money was guaranteed, ours wasn’t. Half of ours went missing. Trump’s Art of the Deal will not let this abuse of America continue. https://t.co/HQzPhqgzOF
Video Transcript AI Summary
Zelensky got the U.S. to spend $350 billion on a war that was unwinnable and unnecessary, a war that wouldn't have started under my presidency. Without U.S. involvement, this war will never end. The U.S. has spent far more than Europe, who will get their money back as a loan, unlike us.
Why didn't Biden demand equalization, especially since this war affects Europe more? Zelensky admits half the money we sent is missing and refuses to hold elections. He played Biden, a dictator without elections needs to act fast.
We will negotiate an end to the war with Russia because Biden and Europe have failed. Zelensky is upset he wasn't invited to Saudi Arabia. The losses are staggering, and Zelensky has done a terrible job. To end the war, you must talk to both sides, which hasn't happened for three years. We aim for a ceasefire and stability in Europe and the Middle East.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But think of it, a modestly successful comedian. President Zelensky talked The United States Of America into spending $350,000,000,000 to go into a war that basically couldn't be won, that never had to start and never would have started if I was president. Not even a chance. And it didn't start for four years. Never would have started.
But a war that he, without The US and Trump, will never be able to settle. They'll never settle that war without our involvement. That's why they did such a great job this weekend. That's why Saudi Arabia did such a great job this weekend in hosting. The United States has spent $200,000,000,000 more than Europe, and Europe's money is guaranteed.
They get their money back. It's a form of a loan. Nobody knows that. I know that. I said, why isn't somebody saying, you know, we do it the same way, and we spent much more money.
We have to equalize. But while The United States gets nothing back, so they get their money back. It's a it's a loan. We just give our money. And we had a deal based on rare earth and things, but, they broke that deal.
But we, they broke it two days ago. We had a deal because, I said, we're spending $350,000,000,000, and Europe gets their money back in the form of a loan, and we don't. We're just giving the money hand over fist. That's the Biden administration for you. But they're no longer dealing with the same United States as they were dealing with a few months ago.
Why didn't Crooked Joe Biden demand equalization? And that this war is far more important, to Europe than it is to us, and that there's a very big, beautiful ocean, a separation. This is you know, we're helping Europe. We're trying to help Europe. On top of this, Zelensky admits that half of the money that we sent them is missing.
They don't know where the money is. He said, well, we don't know where half of it is. That's great. Wonderful. He refuses to have elections.
It's low in the real Ukrainian polls. I mean, how can you be high with every city is being demolished? It's hard to be high. Somebody said, oh, no. His polls are good.
Give me a break. Every city is being demolished. They look like a demolition site, every single one of them. And the only thing he was really good at was playing Joe Biden like a fiddle. He played him like a fiddle.
That's an expression we use, yes, sir, to say that, he's pretty easy. Pretty easy. A dictator without elections. Zelensky better move fast or he's not going to have a country left. Gotta move.
Gotta move fast because that war is going in the wrong direction. In the meantime, we're successfully negotiating an end to the war with Russia. Something I'll admit that only Trump is gonna be able to do in the Trump administration. We're gonna be able to do it. I think Putin even admitted that.
Biden never tried. Europe has failed to bring peace, And Zelensky probably wants to maybe he wants to keep the gravy train going. I don't know what's the problem, but he hasn't been able. He's very upset that he wasn't invited. He could have come if he wanted to, but that he wasn't invited to Saudi Arabia.
But, he's been working for three years. There's never been even meetings or phone calls to stop this war. It's a horrible thing. I figure Russia's lost 900,000 soldiers. I think that Ukraine's lost probably 700,000.
And it's a terrible thing. You'll see body parts bodies and body parts all over the field, all over. We see them through very accurately through satellites. I love Ukraine, but Zelensky has done a terrible job. His country is shattered, and millions and millions of people have unnecessarily died.
And you can't bring a war to an end if you don't talk to both sides. You gotta talk. They haven't been talking for three years. So we hope to see a ceasefire soon and to reestablish stability in Europe and The Middle East.
reSee.it AI Summary
I expressed my concerns about U.S. taxpayer money being spent in Ukraine, specifically the $4.8 million allocated for social media influencers. I questioned the rationale behind funding a leader like Zelensky, whom I compared to other authoritarian figures, such as the general in Egypt, where elections are absent. I highlighted the inconsistency in supporting leaders who do not face electoral accountability, emphasizing the need to reconsider financial aid to what I view as dictatorial regimes.
@CollinRugg - Collin Rugg
Rand Paul says U.S. taxpayers have spent $4.8 million in Ukraine for "social media influencers," says the U.S. should not be funding a "dictator" like Zelensky. "$4.8 million [has been] spent in Ukraine for social media influencers." "Over the years, we've given Egypt nearly $60 billion. Who runs Egypt? A general where there are no elections..." "Kind of like Ukraine where it's a 'president' but he doesn't have to run for re-election because he has canceled the elections." "Why in the world would we give money hand over fist to dictators?" 🔥
Video Transcript AI Summary
President Trump's administration is uncovering wasteful spending, like millions on sex changes in Guatemala, girl-centric climate change in Brazil, and social media influencers in Ukraine. Even worse, hundreds of thousands were spent on sending designers to a Paris fashion show.
Instead of funding these crazy projects, let's redirect that money to secure our border. Fiscal conservatives are proposing to increase spending, but there's a way to cut it. It's called rescission. The administration can bundle savings and send it to us for a simple majority vote, no Democrats needed.
There's a debate about whether our biggest threats are internal or external. I believe they're internal. We don't need unlimited military spending or to be everywhere in the world. If we want more money for the military, take it from overseas spending like climate change initiatives. We're giving billions to dictatorships without elections.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: President Trump came to town, a new way of thinking. They're shuttering agencies. They're shutting people down. They're finding things like $2,000,000 spent in Guatemala for sex changes, $3,000,000 spent in Brazil for a girl centric climate change, $4,800,000 spent in Ukraine for social media influencers. While you're at it, we spent not we, but the people who vote for this.
I voted against all of this. But the members of the senate who voted for this spent several hundred thousand dollars sending designers in Ukraine to the fashion show in Paris. It goes on and on. Thousands of dollars for a trans opera in Colombia, more thousands of dollars for a trans comic book in Peru, Hundreds Of Thousands Of Dollars spent studying rats to see if lonely rats use more cocaine than well socialized rats. Guess what?
Lonely rats love the cocaine. You spent hundreds of thousand dollars of your money on this craziness. Why not take that crazy spending that Doge and Elon Musk are finding and move it over to securing the border? Instead, fiscal conservatives are faced with a bill they're putting forward to just simply increase the spending. I'm all for moving it around.
I'm all for saving it from the craziness and pushing it over into something more valuable. There is a procedure for doing this. It's a special procedure, doesn't require any Democrat vote. It can happen through simple majority, and it has a fancy name. It's called rescission.
So all the administration would have to do is bundle together several hundred billion dollars of savings, which it appears they're finding, bundle it together in one bill, send it back to us, and by simple majority, without any help from the Democrats, Republicans can cut spending. Instead, things aren't what they appear to be. You see all this great work being done to cut spending, to cut waste, fraud, and abuse, and then you see the senate acting. We're gonna vote all night long to set up a bill to increase spending by $340,000,000,000. There is a true philosophical debate within the Republican Party and really within both parties about what the biggest threats to our country are.
Are the gravest threats to America from within or from without. I would argue that they're from within. I don't lay awake at night fearing foreign invasion, that invaders are coming to our shores any moment. Doesn't mean we shouldn't be prepared, that we shouldn't defend ourselves, but it does mean that we don't have to have unlimited spending on our military. Look, many of my family have served, soldiers have to be paid, and we should take care of them.
But at the same time, we shouldn't be everywhere around the world all the time. We spent close to $300,000,000,000 in Ukraine. We got soldiers all over Africa. We got soldiers in Syria. We got soldiers everywhere.
We don't need to be doing that. If you wanna put our military's money and spending in perspective, we spend more than the next nine countries combined. It's not that we're spending too little, we're spending a lot. But if you decide that you want more money for the military, take it from the climate change, the girl centric climate change in Brazil. Quit spending your money overseas.
Over the years, we've given Egypt nearly $60,000,000,000. Who runs Egypt? A general where there are no elections, kinda like Ukraine, whether it's a president, but he doesn't have to run for reelection because he's canceled the elections. Why in the world will we giving money hand over fist to dictators and people who don't stand for election? In Egypt, we gave it to one family, the Mubarak family.
When he was finally ousted from power, he had $20,000,000,000 on him.
@ProjectConstitu - Project Constitution
@bennyjohnson 🚨BOMBSHELL New IG Report shows US didn't vet a single dollar of money sent to Ukraine, nor has it verified that the money is being used for its intended purpose https://t.co/QlIZW74CAc
@offbeateffect - Nad
It’ll never not be weird how we have senators such as Mark Kelly, who are openly supporting actual Nazis in Ukraine, while they call anyone who opposes sending billions of our taxes to Israel, a Nazi. https://t.co/IjoAXYutEm
@pr0ud_americans - 𝐃𝐔𝐓𝐂𝐇
Senator Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) broke party lines yesterday, voting 'YES' on an amendment to defund DOGE, Elon Musk’s government efficiency initiative under Trump. The only Republican to do so, she joined Democrats in a failed 48-52 vote. https://t.co/zED7TG2cIu
@amuse - @amuse
DOGE: Why is Senator Sheldon Whitehouse such a huge critic of DOGE and Elon Musk? Turns out he's been funneling millions to an NGO that pays his wife millions. His wife isn't paid by just one government funded NGO but two including the Atlantic Council. The corruption is deep.
