TruthArchive.ai - Related Post Feed

Saved - April 21, 2024 at 2:42 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The posts discuss controversial theories about World War II, claiming that it was a conspiracy to establish central banks and the US dollar as the global currency. They argue that the US fought on the wrong side, helping communism take over the world. The posts also question the validity of the Nuremberg International Tribunal and the Holocaust, suggesting that confessions were obtained through torture and that there is no evidence of mass graves or gas chambers. They argue that the death toll was much lower than reported and attribute the starvation and death in German labor camps to allied bombings.

@utism_ - Bullzeye 🎯⚡️

Another day, another nuke from orbit. 🍝🥫🧵🪡 I’m done playing softball, from now on I am gonna sauce everyone’s balls off 24/7. It’s time to wake up from the matrix. The reality is, we send our best men to die fighting our Christian brothers for the almighty ✡️ machine. WW2 was a psyop to establish central banks (✡️) and cement the US dollar as the global currency. We slaughtered our own, and then let them lie to us about what happened and slander the ones fighting the evil. I cannot allow this.

@utism_ - Bullzeye 🎯⚡️

https://archive.org/details/DennisWise_TGS

Internet Archive: ErrorInternet Archive logoDonate iconSearch iconSearch iconUpload iconUser iconWeb iconTexts iconVideo iconAudio iconSoftware iconImages iconDonate iconEllipses iconHamburger iconSearch iconDonate icon archive.org

@utism_ - Bullzeye 🎯⚡️

As General Patton said when WW2 was over, we fought the wrong side. The US helped communism take over the world. Our bravest, brightest Christian men slaughtered Germany’s bravest, Christian soldiers to unknowingly install the system that you see today. They ✡️ laughed their way to the bank. Remember the Battle of the Bulge? Germans & Americans called a truce to celebrate Christmas together. Eating, playing sports, etc https://owlcation.com/humanities/About-World-War-2-A-Small-Christmas-Truce

@utism_ - Bullzeye 🎯⚡️

When it was all over, they✡️ had a show trial for all of the world to watch. During the Nuremberg International Tribunal, which was 75% Jewish, they lied about everything, presented zero evidence that anything happened, created a narrative based on hearsay, and established the never ending Holohoax victim narrative we still experience today; this narrative would be used to establish wealth and power for future generations. The judges that presided were embarrassed to be a part, and said as much.

@utism_ - Bullzeye 🎯⚡️

The information about how the presiding judges felt about these trials has been widely studied and discussed, and a lot of it can be found in this book. https://www.holocausthandbooks.com/dl/15-loth.pdf https://t.co/dUsrMmIVb7

@utism_ - Bullzeye 🎯⚡️

“Confessions” from German soldiers and officers were used as evidence of atrocities. These officers were tortured, sometimes to death, to sign statements in English (a language they did not speak), admitting to horrors that scientifically and mathematically could not have taken place. More on these confessions can be found in this book: https://www.holocausthandbooks.com/dl/15-loth.pdf

@utism_ - Bullzeye 🎯⚡️

The reality is that Jews were not kept in death camps, they were kept in labor camps. Hundreds of land surveys, ground samples, GPR scans, and other experiments have been conducted at all of these camps. No evidence of mass graves has EVER been found, and the claim that they were all incinerated is mathematically impossible even by todays crematorium standards. More evidence in this book: https://www.holocausthandbooks.com/dl/15-loth.pdf

@utism_ - Bullzeye 🎯⚡️

They claim that ✡️s were gassed by the millions, using hydrogen cyanide gas (the chemical name for Zyklon-B), however hood scraping the walls of all the supposed “gas chambers,” zero evidence of this was found. In addition, when someone is poisoned with Cyanide, their body turns a bright red color due to a lack of oxygen present in the blood. We have never heard of millions of bright red bodies being buried. https://www.holocausthandbooks.com/dl/15-loth.pdf

@utism_ - Bullzeye 🎯⚡️

In addition to these facts, Red Cross documents depicting the death tolls they found amount to just 272,000 people; this matches records that can be found of the total tally of prisoners in the camps at these times. This information is available here: windowintopalestine.blogspot.com/2010/12/offici… https://t.co/leXvnvH2vu

@utism_ - Bullzeye 🎯⚡️

If that isn’t convincing enough, one could easily look in the World Almanac to find census data regarding the total global population of Jews during the 1929-1948 time period. https://t.co/EtANpWGMOn

@utism_ - Bullzeye 🎯⚡️

In reality these were not gas chambers, they were delousing chambers. Zyklon-B, known to US countries as DDT, was a repellant used to control the spread of lice, which was causing Typhus outbreaks responsible for some of the bodies we see in pictures with falsified captions claiming they were gassed. The inscriptions on the doors and above them, often edited out or photoshopped, say as much.

@utism_ - Bullzeye 🎯⚡️

This video provides a ton more sauce on what these chambers were used for and you can easily pause and take screenshots. https://t.co/jFOD6Aeiux

@utism_ - Bullzeye 🎯⚡️

The reality is that most of the starvation and death we saw from these German labor camps, the “piles of bodies,” was from allied forces bombing German railroads and supply routes. https://t.co/kM6EzwQ4pX

Video Transcript AI Summary
Many bodies at Nordhausen were actually killed by Allied bombing, not by Germans as claimed. The media often shows images of Nordhausen, but evidence shows prisoners were bombed and strafed by British warplanes.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Large number of the bodies were in reality the direct result of allied bombing strafing attacks. Images of Nordhausen are used all over the major media, but it has been proven that these prisoners were blown up and strafed by British warplanes, and they were not exterminated by the Germans as the official story goes.
Saved - September 8, 2023 at 5:34 AM

@BodyBuchan65608 - Osama Been Laiden

the Holocaust didn't show up in encyclopedias until the early 70s. most died from disease and starvation After u.s. cut off supply routes. Jewish population in the world increased according the world almanac. Red cross reported far less in German camps.

Saved - April 26, 2024 at 11:08 PM

@utism_ - Bullzeye 🎯⚡️

@consciousphilos Link to the full package of reports by the Red Cross on German labor camps: https://archive.org/details/ReportOfTheInternationalCommitteeOfTheRedCrossOnItsActivitiesDuringTheSecondWorl/Report%20of%20the%20International%20Committee%20of%20the%20Red%20Cross%20on%20its%20activities%20during%20the%20second%20world%20war%20%28September%201%2C%201939%20-%20June%2030%2C%201947%29%20Vol%201/mode/1up

Internet Archive: ErrorInternet Archive logoDonate iconSearch iconSearch iconUpload iconUser iconWeb iconTexts iconVideo iconAudio iconSoftware iconImages iconDonate iconEllipses iconHamburger iconSearch iconDonate icon archive.org
Saved - November 25, 2023 at 4:03 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
During WWII, the Red Cross denied evidence of extermination camps in Auschwitz. However, Polish resistance and intelligence confirmed the Holocaust, and an official report by the Polish government-in-exile informed the world. Sadly, disbelief hindered its impact. Surprisingly, the Red Cross hasn't changed much since then. #Holocaust #RedCross

@visegrad24 - Visegrád 24

In November 1944, the Red Cross asserted there was no evidence of “installations for exterminating civilian prisoners” in Auschwitz. Polish resistance intelligence, gathered by Jan Karski, confirmed the Holocaust was taking place, and Witold Pilecki who infiltrated Auschwitz itself, confirmed this was an extermination camp. The Polish government-in-exile sent an official note in 1942 to the Foreign Ministers of 26 countries that had signed the United Nations Declaration, informing them of the Holocaust. "The Mass Extermination of Jews in German Occupied Poland", was the first official report on the Holocaust to inform the Western public about the Holocaust. Count Raczyński wrote in it that one-third of the three million Polish Jews had already been killed  – actually, an underestimate. Though the document contained extensive information on the persecution and murder of Jews in Poland, its effect was limited because many people outside German-occupied Europe found it difficult to believe the Germans were systematically exterminating Jews.

@visegrad24 - Visegrád 24

The Red Cross has not changed much since WWII…

@ericmreiner - Eric Reiner

@ICRC_ilot What do you expect? They denied exterminations following their visits to Auschwitz. Despicable. https://t.co/5XuNsPjHev

Saved - April 21, 2024 at 2:45 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Auschwitz was not just one facility, but three major industrial production facilities with numerous satellite locations. These facilities were strategically placed near the German railroad system for efficient supply import and export. Auschwitz III played a significant role in producing synthetic rubbers and fuel. Detailed records show that Jews made up around 39% of the labor camps, followed by Poles and Russians. The Ball Report raises questions about certain building locations in Auschwitz I, which had recreational and living facilities. Many images and sources exist that are not widely advertised. The Red Cross conducted extensive reporting on German labor camps throughout the war.

@utism_ - Bullzeye 🎯⚡️

🚨HOW MUCH DO YOU KNOW ABOUT AUSCHWITZ?🚨 While most are only shown Hollyw🥯🥯d productions and one famous area that made up a recreational and administration facility (Auschwitz I), did you know Auschwitz was actually 3 major Industrial production facilities comprising of up to 40 satellite locations each? As always I will link sources in the comments. 🧵 Picture 1: Auschwitz I, I, and I|l were strategically placed around the center of the German railroad system so that imports and exports of supplies could happen quickly and efficiently throughout the rest of the Country. Picture 2: Although not widely advertised for some reason, images can be found of giant manufacturing centers that would supply crucial industries for the German war effort. Here is Auschwitz III, one of the larger facilities that helped produce synthetic rubbers and fuel for the region. Picture 3: More on Auschwitz III. Some later estimations suggested jews making up around 39% of the labor camps, Poles making up the majority 65%, followed by Russians at 3%. Detailed records of these inmates can be found and will be provided in the post. Picture 4: "The Ball Report" was released by John Ball with the help of allied Ariel photos, and shows Auschwitz I, a recreational and living facility, in detail. Evidence of swimming pools, theaters, brothels, green houses, worship centers, soccer fields, and much more can be seen. This report list MANY valid questions especially pertaining to certain building location decisions that don't seem well thought out. 👀

@utism_ - Bullzeye 🎯⚡️

⚡️KEEP THE VIBES IMMACULATE⚡️

@utism_ - Bullzeye 🎯⚡️

Some interesting footage.

@utism_ - Bullzeye 🎯⚡️

👉🏻 https://archive.org/details/the-ball-report/mode/1up👈🏻

Internet Archive: ErrorInternet Archive logoDonate iconSearch iconSearch iconUpload iconUser iconWeb iconTexts iconVideo iconAudio iconSoftware iconImages iconDonate iconEllipses iconHamburger iconSearch iconDonate icon archive.org

@utism_ - Bullzeye 🎯⚡️

👉🏻 heretical.com/miscella/rudol…👈🏻

@utism_ - Bullzeye 🎯⚡️

Many many images that don’t go mainstream for some reason exist and can be found in books like this: https://www.holocausthandbooks.com/dl/15-loth.pdf And sources like this: https://archive.ph/2021.05.28-122213/https://holocaustdeprogrammingcourse.com/

@utism_ - Bullzeye 🎯⚡️

Truly dasting.

@utism_ - Bullzeye 🎯⚡️

Anyway happy hunting. 😁✌🏻

@utism_ - Bullzeye 🎯⚡️

Don’t forget about the hundreds of pages of reporting that the Red Cross did on these facilities the entirety of the war!

@utism_ - Bullzeye 🎯⚡️

@consciousphilos Link to the full package of reports by the Red Cross on German labor camps: https://archive.org/details/ReportOfTheInternationalCommitteeOfTheRedCrossOnItsActivitiesDuringTheSecondWorl/Report%20of%20the%20International%20Committee%20of%20the%20Red%20Cross%20on%20its%20activities%20during%20the%20second%20world%20war%20%28September%201%2C%201939%20-%20June%2030%2C%201947%29%20Vol%201/mode/1up

Internet Archive: ErrorInternet Archive logoDonate iconSearch iconSearch iconUpload iconUser iconWeb iconTexts iconVideo iconAudio iconSoftware iconImages iconDonate iconEllipses iconHamburger iconSearch iconDonate icon archive.org

@utism_ - Bullzeye 🎯⚡️

@utism_ - Bullzeye 🎯⚡️

👉🏻 https://lovkap.blogspot.com/2018/01/auschwitz.html?m=1👈🏻

auschwitz AUSCHWITZ History Auschwitz  is the most well known and the most talked about of the German camps.  Located in Poland it was originally... lovkap.blogspot.com

@utism_ - Bullzeye 🎯⚡️

The link in post #5 is broken, here is a new one: https://archive.org/details/LecturesOnTheHolocaust.ContGermarRudolf

Internet Archive: ErrorInternet Archive logoDonate iconSearch iconSearch iconUpload iconUser iconWeb iconTexts iconVideo iconAudio iconSoftware iconImages iconDonate iconEllipses iconHamburger iconSearch iconDonate icon archive.org

@utism_ - Bullzeye 🎯⚡️

@threadreaderapp unroll

Saved - December 7, 2024 at 11:39 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I reached out to someone today with a serious message about the potential for WWIII, driven by what I believe are dangerous influences within the Biden Administration. I shared unsettling historical facts, questioning the narratives surrounding major events like the Holocaust and the Bolshevik Revolution, suggesting that Jewish individuals played significant roles in these tragedies. I emphasized the need for truth and freedom of speech to achieve reconciliation and peace. I also expressed concern about the disproportionate representation of Jewish individuals in key positions of power and called for a change in leadership.

@Palsvig - Mads Palsvig

I wrote this to someone today. Dear ......, The same people behind WWI+WWII+ Bolshevik Revolution and even the Chinese revolution are right now hellbent on starting WWIII. I wish to share these facts with you in the hope that you will help stop the loxists in the Biden Administration doing what they can to start WWIII. To be able to do that, I need to share some probably unpleasant facts. If you don't want any of that, you should stop reading any further. That is your choice, I am fine with that, I understand. ........ ........ ........ Okay, if you are still here. If you do read it, then please consider coming out talking against the very strong power of the people Jesus warned us about, the Pharisees or "the Jews who are not Jews and do lie". You can say the same about people pretending to be Christians, Catholics and Muslims, who are in fact Masons, Jesuits and Wahabiists. They all have in common, one thing, they worship the devil, satan, moloch, baal. Once you have read the following, please take your time, it is a lot of information, I guarantee everything has been thoroughly investigated. Here goes: Did you know Churchill, De Gaulle and Eisenhower did not mention the holocaust nor the 6 Mio figure in over 7.000 pages of memoires? Neither does Encyclopedia Britannica mention the Holocaust in its 1968 version, 23 years after the event. Did you know that Auschwitz KZ camp changed their numbers from 4 Mio to 1 Mio and Majdanek from 2 Mio to 30k? Did you know that forensic evidence proves no gassing has taken place anywhere and that all the stories about lampshades, soaps, shrunken heads were all lies? The lies came mainly from camps situated in territories occupied by the USSR. Please see attached official document proving no gassings took place in the Western Allied occupied territories (attached). If you are interested in learning about Auschwitz I recommend the Leuchter report. You can watch these 5 min with Mr Leuchter https://www.bitchute.com/video/1Geck9MDCXWC/ Fred Leuchter American Gas Chamber Expert The Bolshevik revolution in the USSR was a Jewish revolution. 95% of the government was Jewish (that is even 10% more than the present Biden administration). 92% of management managing the gulags were Jewish. 50% of the generals in the NKVD that killed tens of millions of mainly Orthodox Christians and Muslims were Jewish. The USSR also claimed the murder of 21.857 Polish officers in Katyn was done by Germans. At Nuremberg they crushed the balls of 137 out of 139 Germans on trial and threatened them that they would be murdered with their wives and children. Thus motivated they signed a pre written statement that the Germans had murdered the Polish officers in Katyn. In 1989 when the archives were opened in the USSR, Gorbachow publicly admitted that it was in fact the Bolsheviks red army and NKVD, that had murdered the best of the Goyims in accordance with the instructions in the Talmud. Not my words. It is in the Talmud: "Kill the best of the Gentiles''. So we know for a fact: 1: Jews killed tens of millions of Orthodox Christians and Muslims 2: We know they have tried framing the Germans for Katyn, lampshades etc. Is it so difficult to imagine that they were quite motivated to shift the blame from them to the defenseless Germans for the genocide of millions of people? And with the help of hundreds of holocaust movies made by nearly 100% Jewish hollywood, the whole world has been traumatised by stories about gassings, lampshades, soap etc. I certainly have as has my wife, I am sure you as well. The same time hardly anyone has heard about the Jewish holocaust on tens of millions of Russians and Ukrainians from 1917 onwards. And even fewer know about the murder of 15 Mio Germans from 1945-1948 and many more raped, plundered, tortured and ethnically cleansed in the most horrible crimes against humanity ever committed in alledged peace time. Stalin and Jewish Ilya Ehrenberg stated publicly that their soliders should kill and rape all Germans, any psychopath among the Russians were thus given a free pass. I of course acknowledge that the 95% of Russian soldiers who were not psychopaths didn't rape and murder civilians. And while not a single document has ever been found documenting the Germans plan to exterminate the Jews, nor a single statement from a leading German, which is quite ironic since we have seen, read and heard hundreds of statements from Israelis calling the Palestinians "Amalek" and publicly stating their wish to exterminate every one of them including pregnant mothers with babies in their womb. Then there are numerous Jewish politicians, scholars, rabies and authors writing about killing Germans, white people and Christians. There is a word for those people. They are loxists. Here are a couple of examples. Henry Morganthau with his Morganthau plan signed in September 1944 by Roosevelt, half Jewish Churchill and Jewish Stalin (his name was Jugasvili, which means Jewish, he spoke fluent Hebrew and had two Jewish wives). The plan stated the wish to murder 20% of the Germans. Which is exactly what they did. Theodore Kaufman's book "Germany Must Perish". Louis Nizer's book "What to do with Germany" And of course Coodenhove-Kalergy Praktischer Idealismus the plan that is instrumental for the mass illegal immigration we see now in the tens of millions into the US, Canada and EU of mainly young men from countries we have looted and carpet bombed. Now we know the Jewish Bolsheviks were mass murdering liars, is it so hard to believe they wanted to shift the blame on the Germans? Especially if you consider many of them probably were.... loxists. I understand it is a lot of information to absorb, please do your own research and if you come to the same conclusions, I hope you will make the right decision. Rest assured collective punishment is only in the Talmud, both Christianity and Islam has "an eye for an eye", which mean only the guilty person can be punished and only after due process without torture and the guilty persons family, friends, fellow countrymen or even with same religion can not be collectively punished. I am a Christian man, I believe in forgiveness and truth and reconciliation. But please note I said Truth, it is very important. Only with freedom of speech, truth, freedom to study ALL historic events including the holocast and due process can we get to forgiveness and reconciliation and hopefully peace for a 1000 years plus. We need to Separate Synagogue and State, we can't have 85% Jewish people in the Biden Administration, and a simlilar quota in the Federal Reserve, Hollywood, deans on universities and CEOs of mainstream media and wall street. I hope you agree that they are really not up to the task, if their task is to benefit not only Jewish people, but all people. They had a fair shot at it, but clearly failed the task. We need a new team in charge. Thanks again Mads

Fred Leuchter American Gas Chamber Expert The Holocaust Debunked In 5 Minutes bitchute.com
Saved - June 21, 2024 at 7:30 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Ernst Zündel, a German-born publisher and civil rights activist, faced two trials for spreading false news. The trials presented evidence challenging the prevailing narrative of the Holocaust. Witnesses testified about the lack of physical evidence for gas chambers and mass extermination orders. Zündel commissioned a forensic analysis by Fred Leuchter, which concluded that the alleged gas chambers were incapable of supporting mass executions. Zündel's Toronto residence was later set on fire. The posts highlight the importance of questioning historical narratives and the need for truth.

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

THE TRIALS OF ERNST ZÜNDEL Ernst Zündel (1939-2017) was a German-born publisher, author, and civil rights activist. In 1977, Zündel published a 28-page pamphlet called "Did 6 Million Really Die?" written by Richard Verrall. As a result of this pamphlet, in 1983, Sabina Citron, founder of the Canadian h0locaust remembrance association, filed a private complaint against Zündel before the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal. In 1984, the Ontario government joined the criminal proceedings against Zündel based on Citron's complaint. Zündel underwent two criminal trials in 1985 and 1988 for the charge of "spreading false news." To wage the legal battle that was forced upon him, he brought together an impressive all-star international team of researchers, scientists, legal specialists, scholars, and many others. As a result of the two trials, an enormous quantity of evidence and testimony challenging the prevailing narrative was presented to the court under oath and thereby made part of the permanent public record. This thread will shed light on the evidence, testimony, and explosive revelations from his trials.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Zundel claims the Holocaust is a hoax created by Zionists for money. He keeps a model of Auschwitz saying ovens were for typhus victims, not mass murder. He distrusts Jews due to their power in media. Charges were filed against him by a Holocaust survivor. Zundel believes Germans need rehabilitation, denying the 6 million death count.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is Zundel's message. There were no gas chambers in Nazi concentration camps. There was no mass murder of European Jews. The holocaust is a hoax dreamed up after the 2nd World War by Zionists who wanted war reparation, money to establish the state of Israel. In his house, Zundel keeps an elaborate scale model of the Auschwitz concentration camp. Ovens are included, but Zundel says they were used only to burn the bodies of typhus victims. Zundel denies he is anti Semitic, but he is, to say the least, highly suspicious of many Speaker 1: Jews. Because some of them are diabolical liars, exploiters of their own people's suffering, real and imagined. They are manipulators, some of them. Speaker 0: And their power. Speaker 1: But because they have amassed an immense power, especially in the media, they have a terrible power to distort and a terrible power to create mischief. Charges under a little known criminal code, section 177, were laid against Zendo by Oshawa survivor and founder of the Canadian Holocaust Remembrance Association, Sabine Cichron. I'm innocent, as always. No. Actually, this is I consider this just one more step in this struggle to have the Germans rehabilitated. I'm a German. I don't think that the Germans killed 6,000,000

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

Prior to the trial, the jewish defense league, now classified as a terrorist organization, protested the trial, made numerous threats on Zündel's life, and planted a pipe bomb at his house. This was all done in an attempt to silence his testimony from seeing the light of day. https://t.co/oWte3fXbP5

Video Transcript AI Summary
Ernst Zundel is facing threats from the Jewish Defense League, with a recent explosion at his home believed to be caused by a pipe bomb. Zundel claims to have received threats of violence, while the JDL denies involvement. Zundel, known for controversial views on the Holocaust, remains defiant despite the attack. Security measures at his home include cameras, security guards, and barbed wire. The JDL expresses a desire to see Zundel's operation dismantled.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Ernst Zandl is in a state of siege. Jewish Defense League is out to get him with a harassment campaign that he calls terrorism. What did they say? They're gonna kill me. I have my choice to where I want to go. I can be hacked to death. I can be ice picked to death. I can have my testicles cut off. Anything. Mister Zendel produced some tape threads to prove his point. It came from the JBL. I'm only a threat to those people who can't stand democratic debate or the truth. Speaker 1: We are not harassing, this person. We are simply carrying on surveillance. Speaker 2: Early this morning, there was an explosion at the home of Toronto publisher, Ernst Zundel. Metro police believe a pipe bomb is behind the blast. Speaker 3: It happened just before 4:30 this morning. A device which police believed to be a pipe bomb exploded behind a garage at 206 Carlton Street. That address is the residence of publisher Ernst Zundel. Damage to the building and the car inside was minimal, totaling about $2,000 Homes and vehicles nearby Police say they have a number of possible suspects. Police say they have a number of possible suspects. Speaker 0: Basically, it sounded like a powerful blast going off or or a truck or a bus or a fire engine backfiring. And then when you got here, there was nothing but smoke and flames and stuff like that. Speaker 4: The bomb caused about $2,000 damage to Zundal's garage, his car, as well as 3 other cars parked 15 feet away. Speaker 0: My garage killed me. I was not. You know, I don't die that easily. Speaker 4: Sundul, the collector of Nazi memorabilia, has published material suggesting the holocaust was a hoax. He is a man with many enemies. Speaker 0: With also many friends. We here Speaker 4: at City Pulse received a phone call late last night from someone claiming to be a part of a group called the People's Liberation Movement for the Jewish Defense League. The caller told us his group planted the bomb. Speaker 1: I have never heard of any such organization. We did not have anything to do with the bombing of Ensemble Saum. However, I could certainly understand what would motivate some people to carry out such an action. Speaker 0: I admire her levy. I would have expected an answer like that. Speaker 1: I wish for the day when Ernst Zundel's operation will be totally dismantled. Speaker 0: I think that'll come long after his operation has been dismantled, I'm sure. Speaker 4: Zundel has obviously been expecting trouble of some sort. His home features numerous security devices, like outdoor video cameras with monitors inside the house, round the clock security guards, iron bars, search lights, and barbed wire. Speaker 0: If it's a warning, it, has made no impression on me whatsoever.

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

Zündel filed a pre-trial motion to drop the charges on the basis of free speech. The judge denied the motion, claiming "such freedoms were not absolute and there wasn't an unbridled right to say what you think." His second motion to exclude jews from the jury was also denied. https://t.co/fLDQqWV3hH

Video Transcript AI Summary
Jury selection began with Judge Hew Locke rejecting defense requests to drop charges based on free speech guarantees. Defense lawyer Douglas Christie wanted to exclude Jews and Freemasons from the jury due to the nature of the charges. However, the judge denied this, stating that Zundel cannot tailor the jury to his liking. Christie expressed concerns about finding an impartial jury given the controversial nature of the case. Locke also denied questioning prospective jurors about the Holocaust, emphasizing the need for a fair trial.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Jury selection began today after Judge Hew Locke turned down 2 defense requests. Speaker 1: Drive to hear the judge's rulings on 2 pretrial motions. Mr. Zundel had wanted the judge to drop the charges on the basis of the Canadian Charter's guarantees of free speech and opinion. However, Judge Hew Locke threw out that request, saying such freedoms are not absolute, but there isn't an unbridled right to say what you think. Mister Zundel's other request involved the questions his lawyer wanted to put to prospective jurors. As the charges involve publications containing allegations against Jews and Freemasons, defense lawyer Douglas Christie wanted to keep both groups off the jury. Speaker 0: He felt they wouldn't be able to provide impartial judgment in such a case. Before jury selection began, judge Hugh Locke denied a request by defense lawyer Doug Christie to put 9 questions about the Holocaust to prospective jurors. The judge also ruled banning Jews and the freemasons from the jury would prevent a large portion of society from taking part in the trial. Judge Locke said about Zundel, he can't tailor his own jury to suit himself. Defense lawyer Christie said he hoped to ensure an impartial jury. He wanted to ask possible jurors if they are Jewish, if they believe gas chambers were used to kill Jews during World War 2. Christie wondered if his client will get a fair trial. Speaker 1: I think it it is very difficult to get an impartial jury on a controversial question like the one that's an issue here. We'll have to deal with the matter as it arrives.

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

Arnold Friedman, a key witness to the prosecution, who was at Auschwitz, testified that he saw prisoners marched towards the gas chambers and saw smoke and flames rise from the chimney. Upon cross examination, he admitted that he had never witnessed mass executions or gassings. https://t.co/sQbZddoedN

Video Transcript AI Summary
During cross-examination, Christie questioned a key witness about his time at Auschwitz. The witness, Arnold Friedman, admitted he never saw mass executions, only guessing at what happened. Christie suggested bodies burned were from disease, not genocide. He challenged Friedman's claims of seeing smoke and flames from the crematorium, stating cremation doesn't produce such effects. Christie aims to challenge beliefs about the Holocaust.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In a point by point cross examination, Christie attempted to pick apart the testimony of 1 of the crown's key witnesses as he questioned what the man saw during a 9 month stay at the Auschwitz concentration camp. On the stand for the second day, 56 year old Arnold Friedman told the court how he watched columns of prisoners march toward the Auschwitz crematorium. Later, he watched smoke and flames pour from the building's smokestack. But under cross examination, Friedman was forced to admit he had never witnessed mass executions. He only guessed at what happened. He agreed that the columns of prisoners could have been marching out of the camp through a gate next to the crematorium. Christie is out to prove that Zundel has reason to question the widely accepted beliefs about the holocaust. He suggested to Friedman that many of the bodies burned at Auschwitz were those of Jews who died of disease and starvation. Zundel's lawyer, British Columbia attorney Douglas Christie, vigorously cross examined Friedman about exactly what he saw and what he knew about crematoriums. He suggested to Friedman, cremation creates no such smoker flames as he described.

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

The holocaust expert witness for the prosecution, Raul Hillberg, upon cross examination, admitted that there was no single report that the existence of gas chambers and no written record in existence ordering the mass extermination of the jews. https://t.co/SNa78qJpRw

Video Transcript AI Summary
Defense lawyer challenges Holocaust expert's testimony on Hitler's involvement in extermination orders. Expert admits lack of concrete evidence for gas chambers in concentration camps. Questions raised about credibility of sources in expert's book on Jewish deaths during WWII. No definitive proof of gas chamber existence found in reports.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The lawyer representing Ernst Zundel today began challenging some of the testimony given this week by an expert on the Holocaust. The cross examination questions several of the man's statements, including his belief that Adolf Hitler personally ordered the extermination of Jews. Speaker 1: The crown's expert witness, doctor Raul Hilberg, was back on the stand today where he was called to defend many of the conclusions he's made on the holocaust during 40 years of research. Defense lawyer Doug Christie asked doctor Hilberg how he came to the belief that Adolf Hitler personally issued the annihilation order. The doctor replied, Hitler's order was verbal and thus no one knows the correct wording. It's one of the gaps in history, Hilberg said. Speaker 2: One of the main questions has been, did the Germans deliberately intend to kill all Jews, and did Hitler give the order for such a plan? Speaker 3: In court, defense lawyer Doug Christie questioned the fact that the professor quoted a former SS officer ten times in a book the professor wrote about the 25,000,000 Jews were killed by the Germans. Professor Hilberg admitted he left out the officer's incredible points in his book. Speaker 0: A recognized expert on the holocaust today admitted there is no single report that shows the existence of gas chambers in Nazi concentration camps. Doctor Raul Hilberg was testifying for the 3rd day at the trial of Ernst Zundel. Speaker 3: Was there a report that anyone was gassed? Hilberg, there's no single report about gas chambers. I can't swear there's correspondence to prove it.

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

Rudolph Vrba, an Auschwitz escapee, wrote in his memoir that 12,000 were killed per day in the camp and had witnessed their gassings. When pressed about the accuracy of his claims, he said his book was dramatized and an "artistic representation rather than a historical event." https://t.co/Oz0AqtB5TZ

Video Transcript AI Summary
Rudolf Verba, an Auschwitz escapee, testified about the camp's operations. His memoir was challenged in court by Ernst Zundel's lawyer, Doug Christie, who questioned the accuracy of Verba's claims. Verba admitted to dramatizing events in his book, "I cannot forgive," calling it a work of literature. The jury heard varying death estimates for Auschwitz, with Verba estimating 2.5 million deaths. Christie accused Verba of using memory techniques to maintain consistency in his lies. The cross-examination was intense, with Christie questioning Verba's memory and motives. Verba acknowledged that his book was based on multiple eyewitness accounts. Translation: Rudolf Verba, un fugitivo de Auschwitz, testificó sobre las operaciones del campo. Su memoria fue desafiada en la corte por el abogado de Ernst Zundel, Doug Christie, quien cuestionó la precisión de las afirmaciones de Verba. Verba admitió haber dramatizado eventos en su libro "No puedo perdonar", llamándolo una obra de literatura. El jurado escuchó estimaciones de muertes variadas para Auschwitz, con Verba estimando 2.5 millones de muertes. Christie acusó a Verba de usar técnicas de memoria para mantener la consistencia en sus mentiras. El contrainterrogatorio fue intenso, con Christie cuestionando la memoria y los motivos de Verba. Verba reconoció que su libro se basaba en múltiples testimonios de testigos presenciales.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Rudolf Verba, an escapee from Auschwitz, has testified with uncanny precision about what went on in the death camp. Today, the lawyer for Ernst Zundel tested that memory. Doug Christie challenged a memoir that Verba wrote in 1964, which said, among other things, that Auschwitz had a killing capacity of 12,000 a day. This is twice what Verba had reported to authorities after his escape in 1944. Verba admitted that incidents in the book were dramatized. He called it an artistic picture of an event. Doug Christie read from Verba's 1964 death camp memoirs called I cannot forgive. Among the anecdotes, a human gassing demonstration for SS chief Heinrich Himmler. Pressed about the book's accuracy, Verba said it was a work of literature rather than a history book. The jury in the Zundel trial has heard a lot of different death estimates for Auschwitz. Verba himself calculates a grand total of 2a half 1000000. A previous document expert testified 1,000,000, and the Polish government says 4,000,000. No one knows for sure. Werba was telling the court how he kept a mental record of how many Jews went into the Auschwitz death ovens every day. Christie called it a memory technique to keep your lies straight. Speaker 1: A survivor of Auschwitz underwent a tough day of cross examination today in Toronto. Verba found himself under attack for what he claims he saw. Speaker 2: Zumbel's lawyer, Douglas Christie, spent the day challenging Verba's memory and his motives. Especially what Vrba claims he actually saw. The 2 of them engaged in verbal combat throughout the cross examination. Christie wanted to know why Verba's estimate of the number of Jews killed at the camp doubled from his initial statements given after the war and from the claim he made in his book 20 years later. Verb admitted that his book entitled I cannot forgive was a compilation of many eyewitness reports.

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

Robert Faurisson testified on behalf of the defense that the gas chambers and the h0locaust are historical lies. He testified that he believed the casualties totaled from 200k-350k and stated that there was no physical evidence of gas chambers or mass execution orders https://t.co/9nNXEFjnNG

Video Transcript AI Summary
Professor Faurisson testified that the Holocaust and gas chambers are historical lies, citing lack of evidence like soot on crematoriums. Another witness questioned the number of Jewish deaths in World War 2, suggesting a lower figure. Faurisson disputed the 6,000,000 death toll, proposing a range of 200,000-350,000 based on a tracing service. He also claimed the final solution was about territory, not extermination. Survivors' testimonies were questioned, with Faurisson arguing against a policy of working Jews to death. He blamed Israel and Zionists for spreading the "great historical lie" for financial gain from Germany.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Christie used his first defense witness to try to substantiate doubts. Professor Robert Faurisson of France's University told the court his research has convinced him the gas chambers and the holocaust are historical lies. Faurisson recalled a visit to Auschwitz when he ran his finger across the smokestack of a crematorium and found no soot. His investigation revealed that the crematorium was a reconstruction, not the original. Speaker 1: It was another day of startling testimony at the trial of Toronto publisher, Ernst Zundel. The court heard from a professor of literature who spoke out in defense of Zundel. The scholar said the number of Jews who died in World War 2 is nowhere near what we've all been led to believe. Speaker 2: Doctor Robert Porisson disputes the widely held belief that 6,000,000 Jews were killed during World War 2. Said Porrason in court, it's impossible to sustain any more of these fantastic figures. There is not even the slightest proof of even one gas chamber. Rasson testified he believed the casualty figures ranged between 200,350,000. He quoted his source for that estimate as the International Tracing Service, a group that tries to track down Jews who were displaced during the war. Earlier in the day, Forreston testified he believed the final solution was a territorial solution, not an extermination. Speaker 3: Okay. Griffins asked about the testimony of camp survivors who watched fellow inmates being worked to death. Foresell said the fact that there were survivors showed there was no direct policy to work Jews to death. Speaker 4: Morrison calmly told the jury that is no document with Hitler's signature calling for the mass murder of Jews. He said rumors and anti German propaganda led to what he calls the great historical lie that 6,000,000 Jews died. Griffiths, who committed this fraud? Forson, the state of Israel and international Zionists. Griffiths, for what purpose? Forrester said for the financial remuneration, the German government was forced to pay.

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

Russell Barton testified on behalf of the defense that during his time with the Red Cross, upon the liberation of the camps, he saw no evidence to support a German policy of systematic extermination and testified that the deaths were primarily a result of starvation and typhus. https://t.co/yMgYE02urP

Video Transcript AI Summary
Doctor Russell Barton, an English psychiatrist, witnessed the aftermath of the Bergen Belsen camp, where 500 inmates were dying daily from starvation and disease. He disagreed with the belief that the deaths were part of a deliberate German extermination policy. Barton faced criticism for his views, stating that some inmates died from food given by British soldiers that they couldn't digest.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Another defense witness was doctor Russell Bart, a psychiatrist who worked as a Red Cross volunteer in the Bergen Belsen camp after the war. When he arrived with the liberating forces, 500 inmates a day were dying of starvation and disease. He concluded that those deaths were not part of a deliberate German policy of extermination. Doctor Barton testified that he was widely criticized for going against the prevailing view that the Germans purposely caused the deaths. He told the court that some of the inmates even died when British soldiers unknowingly gave them food they couldn't digest. Speaker 1: Doctor Russell Barton, an English psychiatrist, was in Belsen concentration camp shortly after it was liberated. Questioned by mister Zundal's lawyer, he said he didn't believe the deaths he saw resulted from planned extermination.

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

Thies Christophersen was sent to Auschwitz as a scientist researching the development of synthetic rubber. Working side by side with the inmates, Christophersen testified that Auschwitz was a clean and happy work camp, and there was no evidence of gas chambers https://t.co/vDURixnmrm

Video Transcript AI Summary
A former German army officer testified for the defense, stating he arrived at Auschwitz in 1944 and only learned of mass Jewish deaths after the war. He claimed the camp was clean and described it as a happy work environment where he studied synthetic rubber production. According to him, there was no smell of burning flesh or evidence of gas chambers.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In the afternoon, a former German army officer arrived to testify for the defense. Tiss Christofferson was posted to Auschwitz in 1944. He said he only heard of mass Jewish deaths there after the war. He said he never saw evidence of mass gassings. Speaker 1: As Thijs Kristofferson tells it, Auschwitz was a clean and happy work camp. He was there in 1944 studying the production of synthetic rubber, and he says he talked to inmates almost every day. Testifying through a German interpreter, Kristofferson said the air at Auschwitz was very clean. There was no smell of burning flesh, no evidence of gas chambers.

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

Dr. William Lindsey, an American industrial chemist, testified that zyclon B was used for delousing both prisoners and officers, and its application as a mass gassing agent was an impossibility. He also refuted testimony about flames shooting through the chimney day and night. https://t.co/nLtxZBQlUc

Video Transcript AI Summary
An American chemist, Dr. Lindsay, testified about the dangers of Zyklon B gas allegedly used in Auschwitz. He disputed claims of mass gassings and bodies being handled after gassing. Dr. Lindsay stated it was impossible for people to be killed with Zyklon B as described. He also refuted testimony about flames shooting out of crematoria chimneys, saying it would cause them to collapse.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Later another defense witness, Doctor William Lindsay, an American industrial chemist, took the stand. He described the properties of Ziklon B, hydrogen cyanide, the gas said to have been used to kill Jews at Auschwitz and at other camps. Doctor. Lindsay said what a dangerous gas cyclone B was and how carefully it had to be handled. Defense counsel Douglas Christie then mentioned an earlier witness who had claimed to have handled corpses shortly after the victims had been gassed. Doctor. Lindsey said this was highly unlikely. Asked by mister Christie about mass gassings, doctor Lindsay said it was impossible for it to have happened the way it's described. No one was willfully killed with Ziclon B in this manner. Doctor Lindsey also suggested that earlier testimony concerning flames, day night shooting out of crematoria chimneys was wrong. He said this would cause a brick and mortar chimney to fall apart.

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

Ditlieb Felderer testified on behalf of the defense that during his 27 visits to Auschwitz, he witnessed an Olympic sized swimming pool, a banquet room, a sauna, a dance hall, and an orchestra that would perform for the inmates. He described the alleged gas chambers as a fake. https://t.co/WiJeBN96jB

Video Transcript AI Summary
Defense witness Ditleid Felderrer compared himself to Voltaire, defending free speech. He visited Auschwitz 27 times, claiming to find amenities like a swimming pool, banquet room, sauna, and dance hall. He called a crematorium a Hollywood set. Ernst Zindel used Felderer's research in his work. During cross-examination, Felderer read from leaflets mocking the Holocaust and gas chambers, for which he faced prosecution in Sweden. Translation: Defense witness Ditleid Felderrer compared himself to Voltaire, defending free speech. He visited Auschwitz 27 times, claiming to find amenities like a swimming pool, banquet room, sauna, and dance hall. He called a crematorium a Hollywood set. Ernst Zindel used Felderer's research in his work. During cross-examination, Felderer read from leaflets mocking the Holocaust and gas chambers, for which he faced prosecution in Sweden.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Meanwhile, a defense witness, Ditleid Felderrer of Sweden compared himself to Voltaire upholding the right of free speech. He said that in his 27 visits to Auschwitz in recent years, he found an Olympic sized swimming pool, a banquet room, a sauna, even a dance hall where prisoners orchestras played for inmates. He described a crematorium as a Hollywood stage place, a fake. Ernst Zindel has used some of Felderer's research in his own publications. In cross examination, Felderer was made to read from some of his leaflets for which he's been prosecuted in Sweden. They mock the holocaust and make fun of gassings.

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

Roger Dommergue, a jewish scholar, recorded an audio cassette aa an affidavit for Zündel's defense. He stated, "The only thing we know about H¡tler is that he killed six million jews.. which never existed..in gas chambers.. which nobody ever saw. That's all we know for sure." https://t.co/3u53qULrvE

Video Transcript AI Summary
I come from a prominent Jewish family and value truth above all else. I believe the Holocaust is a hoax due to simple arithmetic - how could 6 million Jews have died when there were only 3 million in Europe? I reject propaganda and prioritize facts and logic. I have dedicated years to researching this issue and will not be swayed by anyone, even my own family. Truth matters to me more than anything.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I belong to a very important international Jewish family from by my mother. And I've been very interested. And and my only passion, except the piano, is truth. That's why in spite of, the way that my congenials treat you, I don't want to be take part in this, in this real absolute life because I've been working on your case and for his own case these last 6 or 7 years. And I have I know that, the problem for instance of the Holocaust is a complete fake because it's very easy to know. Because it's a it's a simple technical arithmetic problem, which could be solved by a child in high school. Now any chemist know that you can't, gas people with cyanide acid. Let's call it that in English. Hydrogenic acid. Hydro yeah. Hydrocyanic acid. Hydrocyanic acid. 1,000 or 2,000 people at the time. It's well known. And, even the most important American Jewish newspaper, like the American Jewish air book, said that there was 3,003,000 Jews, in occupied Europe in 1942. So I don't see how they could have killed 6,000,000 Jews when there was only 3,000,000. So I think anybody can see that. So for you, it's a question of logic versus illogic. Of truth logic, of course. Or facts versus propaganda. Facts versus propaganda. Propaganda. I thought I hate propaganda. Even if my own mother would tell me such nonsense, I would say my own mother go to bed and leave me alone. Yeah. So what should I say to my engineers? Even if they are, if they are billionaires, I have nothing to do. I don't care about the universe. Truth interest with us all.

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

Zündel took the stand and testified in his own defense. He explained to the court how his beliefs were formed through years of tireless research in search of the truth and fueled by his desire to rid the German people of the stigma that was a direct result of a historical lie. https://t.co/zQVmFO1zer

Video Transcript AI Summary
Ernst Zindel denies the Holocaust, claiming it's anti-German bias. He believes the high death toll in camps was due to typhus, not gas chambers. Zindel criticizes the Nuremberg trials and calls the Holocaust war propaganda. He argues for seeking the truth to avoid being mental slaves.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Ernst Zindel portrayed himself today as a man fighting for the good name of Germans. And part of that fight is the denial of the holocaust. Zindal came to Canada in 1958. He said he found Germans slandered in print and on television. We were cowards, criminals, romantic dreamers, butchers, and colonel Klinx, the butt end of every joke, and I didn't like it. He told the court that Holocaust was at the center of the anti German bias. Until 1960, he believed that 6,000,000 Jews had been killed. Then after reading widely and interviewing authors around the world, he changed his mind. Referring to some of the holocaust atrocity stories, Zindel said, only someone mesmerized by propaganda could believe in such nonsense. Zindel testified that the high death toll at camps like Dachau was mostly due to typhus and those epidemics came late in the war. There were no active gas chambers for humans, he said. The jury in the trial has seen this military film alleging that a shower at Dachau was used to gas Jews with cyclone b gas. Zindel said that most authorities, including officials at Dachau today, now say that the gas chamber was never used. It took 20 years, he said, to admit that Dachau, Buchenwald, and Bergen Belsen did not have gas chambers, he said. In time, the world would have to admit that Auschwitz and other eastern camps also did not use gas for human extermination. Zindl also said that the post war Nuremberg trials were Germany's darkest hour, an example of human debasement. Through his lawyer Doug Christie, Zindal introduced the writings of American politicians and jurists of the 19 forties who criticized the trials as a blot on American justice. Zindel said the holocaust is like a rumor that grows wilder each time it's repeated through each generation. He said it served well as war propaganda, but 40 years later, it is time to put that propaganda aside. Speaker 1: Dundall told the jury that we must now realize that every government manipulates information and has censorship in times of war, and that we owe it to ourselves to be informed the truth or we will be mental slaves even after the war is over.

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

Ivan Legacé, a cremation expert, testified for the defense. He refuted that 4400 bodies were being cremated daily at Auschwitz, claiming it was "preposterous and outside the realm of reality." He stated that the maximum possible number of cremations daily was 184" https://t.co/2nPJRwby6D

Video Transcript AI Summary
Ivan Lageys, a crematorium expert, discussed the cremation process and refuted claims about the capacity of crematories at Auschwitz Birkenau. He stated that the numbers claimed were physically unrealistic based on his experience, with a maximum of 184 bodies possible to cremate in a day. Lageys criticized claims of 6,000, 8,000, and 24,000 bodies being cremated daily as irresponsible and not based in reality, suggesting that the Holocaust may be a hoax.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Ivan Lageys was tendered as an expert in the practical aspects of crematorium practice. Lageys worked as a professional embalmer funeral director director and crematory manager and operator at the Bow Valley Crematorium in Calgary, Alberta. He had completed 2.5 year funeral services program at Humber College in Ontario, and in 1979, obtained his diploma in Ontario license. In 1983, he obtained his Alberta license. In the course of his career, Lagais had dealt with over 10,000 bodies in his work and had cremated over 1,000 bodies himself. The work involved bodies in a variety of physical conditions from accident and fire victims to people who died of highly contagious diseases. Now he used flowcharts to explain to the jury, which are for a layman, the process of cremation. He brought along fire bricks, and he let them feel it and touch it, lift it in order to show what kind of material was involved. He also pointed out that these fire bricks are extremely expensive, costing up to $60 for 1 brick. And then he was asked about Holocaust claims of numbers of cremations at Auschwitz Birkenau. And Lageries commented on Raoul Hilberg's Claiming the Destruction of European Jews, 2nd Edition, Page 978, with respect to the capacities of the 46 rethorps in the 4 crematories at Birkenau, and he said, quoting Doctor. Hilberg, The theoretical daily capacity of the 4 Wirkenau crematory was somewhat over 4,400 persons or cadavers, but with breakdowns and slowdowns, the practical limit was almost always lower. Laguerre stated that this claim was preposterous and beyond the realm of reality to claim that 46 retorts could cremate over 4,400 bodies in a day was ludicrous. Based on his own experience, Laguerre testified that it would only have been possible to cremate a maximum of 184 bodies a day in Bergenau. And then he was asked by the defense attorney, my defense attorney, Dick Christy, about Riedlinger, who claimed 6,000 a day to be cremated, others who claimed 8,000 people were burned and some of them said 24,000 were handled a day. To this, Ivan Lagaest, the Canadian crematory expert says it was irresponsible. These people were irresponsible with their facts because this doesn't even begin to end the reality at all. It is just physically unrealistic. Physically unrealistic. In other words, science dares to say the Holocaust, as we have heard it, is basically a hoax.

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

David Irving testified for Zündel, stating that "There isn't a shred of evidence that H;tler ordered the mass extermination of the jews" He produced evidence in court that the British psychological warfare executive engineered the gas chamber story as atrocity propaganda. https://t.co/vrJVuxDkAK

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker, a well-known author, discusses his shift from believing in the Holocaust to considering it a hoax. He reveals uncovering evidence in British archives suggesting the gas chamber story was a propaganda campaign by the Allies. Documents show the British Psychological Warfare Executive initiated the gas chamber narrative to divert attention from Soviet war crimes. The chairman of the Joint Intelligence Committee expressed concerns about the lie being exposed in 1944. The speaker questions the truth of Auschwitz and other atrocities, emphasizing the ongoing impact of wartime propaganda. Translation: The speaker, a famous author, talks about changing his beliefs from the Holocaust to a hoax. Evidence from British archives suggests the gas chamber story was Allied propaganda to cover up Soviet war crimes. The chairman of the Joint Intelligence Committee expressed worries about the lie being exposed in 1944. The speaker doubts the truth of Auschwitz and other atrocities, highlighting the lasting effects of wartime propaganda.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: He is the most publicized author on historical topics in the English language in the world. The moment when he came out and said that he now believed that the holocaust was a Speaker 1: hoax. And now towards the end of my writing life, I find that I'm having to reexamine one of those other towns, Auschwitz. And it's a very, very painful process because halfway through my writing career, I wrote a book about Hitler, a biography of Hitler, in which I was still a believer, And now I've turned into an unbeliever. And here I am holding up the documents proving that the Hitler diaries are fake and a few seconds after that flashlight photograph was taken, I was. I was escorted out of the room about this size in front of the eyes of the world's television cameras right into the arms of, ABC and Good Morning America. So that about, two and a half minutes later, I was broadcasting live to the entire United States and completely wrecking their chances of over selling Hitler Dyer over there. It's one of the high points in one's life. And I must admit that at that time, my conviction that that $6,000,000 worth of diaries were fakes was less securely founded than my conviction that I have grown to accept over the last 6 months or so that the other 6,000,000 fake is also unsecurely founded. I am now more sure than ever that there's something stinks about that episode than I was at the time I held up these documents on the Hitler diaries. I was quite prepared a few days later to believe that perhaps the Hitler diaries were genuine, but no one will ever convince me now that what we are told happened in Auschwitz and Trebelinka and Majdanek did actually happen. Speaker 0: That it was allied propaganda rehashed over and over again, and unearthed some documents and quoted them widely that the British psychological warfare decision deliberately in the early forties launched this campaign to deflect away from Soviet war crimes. Speaker 1: By doing the work in the British archives that the other historians have not done, Paul Morris has turned up the evidence that our own psychological warfare executive were behind the entire gas chamber story. And once again, we're quoting from the archives. They're in the British archives, how the psychological warfare executive decides quite cold bloodedly and cynically to start putting out over the radio waves the allegation that the Germans have built special gas chambers for gassing the Jews and getting rid of them. And later on in the files, round about 1944, we find the chairman of the Joint Intelligence Committee, who is responsible for the Psychological Warfare Executive, writing a handwritten minute. His name is Victor Cavendish Bentink, an eminent banker, an industrialist, still alive in England now, a law of Portland as he is now, chairman of the Joint Intelligence Committee, writing in hand, writing in 1944, words to the following effect. We've had a good run for our money with this gas chamber lie, but really we've got to be a bit careful because eventually it's going to be exposed and then our entire psychological warfare effort will be brought down with it. So isn't it a bit isn't it a good time now to distance ourselves from this particular story? We've set the hare running, now we ought to let it go off by ourselves. A good run for their money in 1944. And here we are in 1988, and that hare is still running 44 years later.

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

Zündel commissioned Fred Leuchter, a gas chamber expert, to travel to Auschwitz, Treblinka and Majdanek to conduct a forensic analysis of the alleged gas chambers. He sampled the soil and brick, took measurements, drew floorplans, and sent the samples to a lab for analysis. https://t.co/bpMOdTkzuy

Video Transcript AI Summary
I planned to send an expert to investigate gas chambers in Auschwitz, Birkenau, and Majdanek with a team. They took samples and had them tested at a lab without revealing their origin. The lab director personally conducted the tests, which were crucial in my court case.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I was planning to send an American gas chamber expert, an execution expert called Fred Leuchter behind the then still existing iron curtain to go with an entire team of experts to investigate the alleged gas chambers in Auschwitz, Birkenau and Majdanek. And this team did call translators, filmmakers, craftsmen, and so on. And they went to sites, and they took soil samples, rock samples, concrete samples. They scraped these samples into scientifically with rubber gloves, facial masks that there could be no claim for Wanna get my docu for contamination and documented on each little sample bag, filmed, photographed with an eyewitness present that says, be no claim of tampering, and dated those samples and had compasses so that we knew exactly from where these samples were taken. Each gas chamber or alleged gas chamber was painstakingly measured and it was noted down is for the first time detailed drawings were made, architectural type drawings, and the location where the samples were taken were noted in those drawings. So when they came back with these samples after some pretty adventurous times to the United States, they submitted these samples to a very famous laboratory in Massachusetts, the Ashland laboratory, and these people did a test on those samples. They didn't know that these were Auschwitz samples or Majdanek samples or Birkenau samples. They thought they were doing some kind of an industrial accident sample. We had to do this because we did not want to have these samples put into question later on, we wanted to have absolutely neutral person, unbiased persons doing this stuff. As was our fortune the director of the lab did the samples himself in conjunction naturally with some lab personnel. And they proved to be a sensation in my court case.

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

Fred Leuchter's explosive report compiled from his forensic analysis of the alleged gas chambers and gave irrefutable proof that the chambers were incapable of supporting hydrogen cyanide gas for the purpose of mass execution and HAD NEVER BEEN USED AS GAS CHAMBERS https://t.co/QKeubC9dJQ

Video Transcript AI Summary
Zundel's defense team was informed that facilities in Poland could not support gas executions. Samples were taken and facilities were examined, concluding they were not suitable due to design flaws. Survivors' testimonies were questioned as lacking validity. No eyewitness reports were found to support gas chamber claims.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Mister Zundel and his defense team, prior to my going that if I did in fact find facilities that could have supported executions, not only whether they did did support the executions, but only whether or not they could have sustained gas executions. I would make that very clear in my report and that is what I would testify to when I testified in court. With the exception of the video photographer, I brought the same things that I would have normally brought to a prison in the United States if I was doing a survey of their equipment. The the draftsman was there to take and verify measurements. The drawings were made on-site and then reproduced when we returned to the United States to document everything we saw. I personally made photographs and produced a great deal of photographic evidence of the hardware and facilities that we found in Poland. And the video photographer, which was not a normal thing for me, me, was brought to document the fact that the forensic samples that I removed from the facilities, the control sample from the Lovesick facility number 1 of Dreckenau, and all of the other samples from the alleged gas execution rooms were properly taken, packaged for and packaged for submission to the laboratories. I examined the facilities and I made a determination that they were incapable of supporting the use of hydrogen cyanide gas for purposes of execution or otherwise. But additionally, it would be necessary to move remove samples, return them to the United States for testing at an independent laboratory to, in fact, confirm what my visual inspection indicated that these facilities never, in fact, contained hydrogen cyanide. Yes. Speaker 1: What aside from the samples convinced you that these facilities could not have been used then or now as execution facilities. Speaker 0: The samples in my mind were mainly corroborative. The reasons that I determined that these facilities were not or never could have been gas execution facilities are stated in my report. And it does it mainly is concerned with the design and fabrication of these facilities. The requirements necessary in the design of a facility that contains a highly explosive and highly poisonous gas. You must have gasketed doors, no windows, means of getting the gas in, means of getting the gas out, something for heating the gas and the air to constantly keep the right temperature, explosion proof switches, lighting facilities, etcetera. None of these ever existed. We're talking about brick and mortar buildings without heat, with non explosion proof lighting, without gasketed doors, in some cases, without doors at all and with crematories that opened very close or adjacent to the facility. If these facilities were used for gas execution facilities, if those persons operating the facilities didn't gas themselves to death at the same time that the executeees died, they certainly would have been blown to bits when the gas exploded from a spark arc in a switch, the heat of a light bulb, or the gas approaching and getting into the crematory furnace. I mean, it's just ludicrous to consider that these facilities could have been used as gas chambers. Speaker 1: Well, we all know from reading the newspapers and watching TV that there's many holocaust survivors who say that they actually saw gassings. They describe them in minute detail, which relative it was they lost, down to the color of the corpses and the color of the smoke coming out of the chimney. How do you respond to these people? Speaker 0: Well, one of the things that was necessary for me to do, Kurt, at the outset, so I'd have an understanding of what I was doing, was read the literature and alleged eyewitness reports. So I could make a determination of the protocol, which that's a fancy word that we use in terms of executions for determining, for what the actual procedure is for the execution. And I found through these investigations that there was no such a thing as an eyewitness. I have never seen a report that was written by anyone who had a valid description of what could have happened at a gas. So the long and the short of it is, there are no eyewitnesses because there were no gas

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

On 8 May 1995, Zündels Toronto residence was set on fire, resulting in $400,000 in damage. A group that called itself the "Jewish Armed Resistance Movement, claimed responsibility for the arson attack. The group had ties to the JDL and Meir Halevi. https://t.co/G8LRKwJ7Z5

Video Transcript AI Summary
It's 4:30 in Toronto, standing in the damaged library. Books ruined by fire and water. Found a newspaper about Germany seeking peace in 1933. The building was set on fire at 5:30 this morning, but luckily, Joergen escaped with surveillance tapes. The library on the 3rd floor is destroyed, the rest of the building needs to be checked for safety. Starting over will be a challenge.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's about 4:30, in the afternoon here in Toronto on Carlton Street, and I'm standing in what was the library, the reading room. As many of you know, been up here and, read some of the books that is they had up here in the past. But, so many of them now. If it wasn't, for the fire damage, it's the water damage. They just seem to have mounted together somehow. And, as luck would have, I'm gonna pick up here? Germany declares for peace. Adolf Hitler addressing the German nation on October 14, 1933. The irony about the whole thing is is basically that's what has been for 30 years. You know, hoping a peaceful solution, talk it out, and, never, violent aggression. And, this is what it's come to. Sometime this morning at 5:30, gasoline poured up against the front of the house, and the house set on fire according to the surveillance tapes from, cameras. Luckily, Joergen, who was in the building at the time, managed to, get himself and surveillance tapes out before the building was basically engulfed. The entire 3rd floor with the library and there's private, for just behind us is basically what you see. What isn't burned is soggy. You know, the roof, is missing in portions. The rest of it can be torn down. As for the rest of the building, we have to go through it and see what's left to be safe, to start over. And, I'm sure this is gonna deter

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

The Zündel Prophecy https://t.co/RieM1NJZyK

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker questions why the educated Germans turned on the Jews despite their achievements. They suggest that similar behaviors seen in Germany could lead to similar outcomes in the United States, predicting Weimar-like conditions and solutions.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Nobody has ever analyzed why the German nation did add more Nobel Prize winners and more famous research and scientists and was one of the best educated countries in Europe turn on the Jews. Why did these good Germans turn on the Jews who had more Jews living amongst them than even percentage wise living in the United States today? Why was that? Because they displayed the same for racial ethnocentrism, power grabbing, influence peddling, buying of politicians, dominating of the public airwaves and the and the public media in Germany and so on that they display in United States. And I'm not much of a prophet, but that much I can say based on history that in United States, mark my word, you will have Weimar conditions and you'll have solutions to the Weimar conditions. It will be very similar to what happened in Germany.

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

Did 6 million really die? https://t.co/VYjpN870lq

Video Transcript AI Summary
International Red Cross estimated around 271,000 to 290,000 total dead in camps, with 150,000 to 200,000 being Jewish. Auschwitz had around 29,000 Jewish deaths. Majdanek's death toll was revised from 2,000,000 to 78,000. Despite revisions, the total Holocaust death toll remains at 6,000,000. Sources like the World Almanac show discrepancies in Jewish population numbers during the Holocaust.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Officials from the International Red Cross visited the camps regularly and had complete access to the camps, documented everything, and estimated the total dead from all the camps to be around 271,000 to 290,000. About half of these dead were Jewish. So we are now talking about some 150 to 200000 Jews that died in the German camps, primarily of disease. In the 16 50 page Red Cross report, there was never a mention of any gas chambers. There basically were 4 categories intern during the war, Poles, Jews, Russians and political prisoners, sometimes alluded to as Germans. Jews made up less than 40% of Auschwitz, only around 12% of Dachau, and only around 30% of Buchenwald. Speaker 1: You've got, for example, the death books of Auschwitz, which is the most reliable source. The Soviets confiscated all the information about, nights and death of people living in Auschwitz when they liberated the camp, and those were finally published in the 1990s. And those give you a total. What is it? 29 1,000 Jews die in Auschwitz throughout the World War II. Okay? And you've got somewhat more Catholics die. You've got more Catholics than Jews dying afterwards. And if you wanna say, oh, there's some missing data there, some Jews not registered who died, and so on, Well, you can put it out at very most, I would say, 4 40,000 Jews dying at Auschwitz. Now I don't allow it to go any higher than that, and that is a 100 times less than the 4,000,000 plaque at Birkenau after the war. So it's put that totally absurd figure. Speaker 0: Number of dead at Auschwitz was revised in 1989 from 4,100,000 down to 1,000,000. Upon capture by the Soviet Union, original propaganda also claimed that 2,000,000 were murdered in Majdanek, which included 7 homicidal gas chambers. 5 of these 7 have been admitted to never even assert as homicidal gas chambers. Number of dead at Majdanek was revised in 2,005 from 2,000,000 to 78,000, but somehow, the official account of 6,000,000 dead remained unchanged. So what is 6,000,000 minus 4,000,000 minus 2,000,000? The Holocaust is the only claimed genocide where millions can be reduced from the total claimed to be killed, but the total figure always remains 6,000,000. Several sources including the World Almanac Red Cross documentation, the New York Times, and the Chambers Encyclopedia shows that the Jewish population recorded does not reflect the testimonials given on the Holocaust. The Jewish World Almanac has been regarded as the absolute most authentic and trustworthy source for the world's Jewish population numbers. And according to the World Almanac, the world population of Jews increased between 1933 1948 from 15,315,000 to 15,753,000.

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

What is the significance of 6 million anyway? It's got to be more than just a number. https://t.co/4YSvl7LIfq

Video Transcript AI Summary
In the years leading up to Hitler's rise to power, various articles in The New York Times and other publications mentioned the dire conditions faced by 6,000,000 Jews in Europe. Reports highlighted issues such as poverty, famine, disease, and the threat of extermination. These articles shed light on the challenges and tragedies experienced by a significant portion of the Jewish population at that time.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Sunday, June 6, 1915. This is 18 year before Hitler ever sat from the government. Yes, people. 6,000,000 Jews. The New York Times, October 18, 1918. And the article is called $1,000,000,000 fund to rebuild a Jewey. There it is. 6,000,000 souls will need help to resume normal life when war was ended. The New York Times, September 8, 1919, and the article is called Ukrainian views aimed at not pogroms. Mass meeting he has that a 127,000 Jews are being killed and 6,000,000 on Powell in The New York Times, November 12, 1919, And it reduced to tragically unbelievable poverty, starvation, and disease. About 6,000,000 souls or half the Jewish population of the Earth. February 23, 1920. 6,000,000 Jews. Friday, May 7, 1920. The Fund For Jewish Watsofers in Central and Eastern Europe, where 6,000,000, there's horrifying conditions of famine, disease, and death. New York Times, Wednesday, July 20, 1921, 12 year before Adolf Hitler ever set foot in the government. Look at that. Russia's 6,000,000 Jews have faced an extermination by massacre. The gazette, Montreal, December 29, 1931. And the article pretty much speaks up for itself. 6,000,000 Jews faced starvation.

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

We have been swindled by censorship and robbed of the truth. They have manipulated our past so they can control our future. NEVER AGAIN. https://t.co/bPg6XhWldJ

Saved - September 5, 2024 at 11:41 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I explored the trials of Ernst Zündel, a controversial figure charged with spreading false news about the Holocaust. His legal battles in the 1980s involved significant testimonies from various witnesses, including Holocaust experts who admitted a lack of concrete evidence for mass extermination orders and gas chambers. Zündel's defense included claims of censorship and manipulation of historical narratives. He argued for free speech, while facing threats and violence from opposing groups. Ultimately, I reflected on the importance of questioning established beliefs and seeking the truth.

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

THE HOLOCAUST ON TRIAL THE SAGA OF ERNST ZÜNDEL Ernst Zündel (1939-2017) was a German-born publisher, author, and civil rights activist. In 1983, Sabina Citron, founder of the Canadian holocaust remembrance association, filed a private complaint before the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal against Zündel for a 28 page pamphlet he had published in 1977 called "Did 6 Million Really Die?" In 1984, the Ontario government joined the criminal proceedings against Zündel based on Citron's complaint, and Zündel underwent two criminal trials in 1985 and 1988 for the charge of "spreading false news." To wage the legal battle that was forced upon him, Zundel brought together an impressive all-star international team of researchers, historians, scientists, legal specialists, scholars, and experts to aid in his defense. As a result of the two trials, an enormous quantity of evidence and testimony challenging the prevailing historical narrative was presented to the court under oath and thereby made part of the permanent public record. This thread will shed light on the evidence, testimony, and explosive revelations from his trials.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Ernst Zundel claims there were no gas chambers or mass murder of Jews in Nazi concentration camps, and that the Holocaust is a hoax invented by Zionists to obtain war reparations and establish Israel. He keeps a scale model of Auschwitz, claiming the ovens were only for typhus victims. Zundel denies being anti-Semitic but expresses suspicion of some Jews, calling them "diabolical liars" and manipulators with immense power in the media. Sabine Cittron, a Holocaust survivor, filed charges against Zundel under section 177 of the criminal code. Zundel maintains his innocence, viewing the charges as part of a struggle to rehabilitate the Germans, and states that Germans did not kill 6,000,000 Jews.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is Zundel's message. There were no gas chambers in Nazi concentration camps. There was no mass murder of European Jews. The Holocaust is a hoax, dreamed up after the 2nd World War by Zionists who wanted war reparation, money to establish the state of Israel. In his house, Zundel keeps an elaborate scale model of the Auschwitz concentration camp. Ovens are included, but Zundel says they were used only to burn the bodies of typhus victims. Zundel denies he is anti Semitic, but he is, to say the least, highly suspicious of many Jews. Speaker 1: Because some of them are diabolical liars, exploiters of their own people's suffering, real and imagined. They are manipulators, some of them. Speaker 0: And their power. Speaker 1: But because they have amassed an immense power, especially in the media, they have a terrible power to distort and a terrible power to create, mister. Charges under a little known criminal code, section 177, were laid against Zendo by Oshawa survivor and founder of the Canadian Holocaust Remembrance Association, Sabine Cittron. I'm innocent, as always. No. Actually, this is I consider this just one more step in this struggle to have the Germans rehabilitated. I'm a German. I don't think that the Germans killed 6,000,000

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

Prior to the trial, the jewish defense league, now classified as a terrorist organization, protested the trial, made numerous threats on Zündel's life, and planted a pipe bomb at his house in an attempt to silence his testimony from seeing the light of day. https://t.co/TE0azViFtC

Video Transcript AI Summary
Ernst Zundel claims the Jewish Defense League is harassing him and threatening to kill him in various ways. He says he is only a threat to those who can't stand democratic debate or the truth. The JDL states they are simply carrying out surveillance, not harassment. Early this morning, an explosion occurred at Zundel's Toronto home. Police suspect a pipe bomb caused minimal damage to the building and a car, totaling about $2,000. Nearby homes and vehicles were also slightly damaged. Zundel publishes material suggesting the holocaust was a hoax and is a collector of Nazi memorabilia. A caller claiming to be part of the People's Liberation Movement for the Jewish Defense League told City Pulse his group planted the bomb. The JDL representative claims to have never heard of such organization, but understands what would motivate people to carry out such an action. Zundel's home features security devices, like outdoor video cameras, round the clock security guards, iron bars, search lights, and barbed wire.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Ernst Zandl is in a state of siege. Jewish Defense League is out to get him with a harassment campaign that he calls terrorism. What did they say? They're gonna kill me. I have my choice to where I want to go. I can be hacked to death. I can be ice pick to death. I can have my testicles cut off. Anything. Mister Zendel produced some tape threads to prove his point. It came from the JBL. I'm only a threat to those people who can't stand democratic debate or the Speaker 1: truth. We are not harassing, this person. We are simply carrying on surveillance. Speaker 2: Early this morning, there was an explosion at Speaker 3: the home of Toronto publisher, Ernst Zundel. Metro police believe a pipe bomb is behind the blast. Speaker 4: It happened just before 4:30 this morning. A device which police believed to be a pipe bomb exploded behind a garage at 206 Carlton Street. That address is the residence of publisher Ernst Zundel. Damage to the building and the car inside was minimal, totaling about $2,000. Homes and vehicles nearby were also damaged slightly by flying metal and wood. This morning's bombing is being investigated by 51 division and the bomb squad. Police say they have a number of possible suspects. Speaker 0: Basically, it sounded like a powerful blast going off or a or a truck or a bus or a fire engine backfiring. And then when he got here, there was nothing but smoke and flames and stuff like that. Speaker 5: The bomb caused about $2,000 damage to Zundal's garage, his car, as well as 3 other cars parked 15 feet away. Speaker 0: My dad killed me. I was, you know, I don't die in any of it. Speaker 5: Zundal, a collector of Nazi memorabilia, has published material suggesting the holocaust was a hoax. It is a man with many enemies. Speaker 0: With also many friends. We here Speaker 5: at City Pulse received a phone call late last night from someone claiming to be a part of a group called the People's Liberation Movement for the Jewish Defense League. The caller told us his group planted Speaker 1: the bomb. I have never heard of any such organization. We did not have anything to do with the bombing of El Salvador. However, I could certainly understand what would motivate some people to carry out such an action. Speaker 0: Maya Halevi, I would have expected an answer like that. Speaker 1: I wish for the day when Ernst Zundel's operation will be totally dismantled. Speaker 5: I Speaker 0: think that'll come long after his operation has been dismantled, I'm sure. Speaker 5: Zundel has obviously been expecting trouble of some sort. His home features numerous security devices, like outdoor video cameras with monitors inside the house, round the clock security guards, iron bars, search lights, and barbed wire. Speaker 0: If it's a warning, it, has made no impression on me whatsoever.

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

Zündel filed a pre-trial motion that sought to drop the charges on the basis of free speech. The judge denied the motion, claiming, "Such freedoms were not absolute, and there wasn't an unbridled right to say what you think." https://t.co/3B1fl7YEC6

Video Transcript AI Summary
Jury selection began after Judge Hew Locke denied two defense requests. Zundel wanted the charges dropped based on Canadian Charter free speech guarantees, but Locke stated these freedoms aren't absolute. Zundel's lawyer, Douglas Christie, sought to exclude Jews and Freemasons from the jury due to allegations against them in Zundel's publications, arguing they couldn't be impartial. Judge Locke denied Christie's request to ask prospective jurors nine questions about the Holocaust. Locke stated banning Jews and Freemasons would prevent a large portion of society from participating and that Zundel can't tailor the jury. Christie hoped for an impartial jury, questioning if his client would receive a fair trial. One speaker stated it is difficult to get an impartial jury on a controversial question like the one at issue.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Jury selection began today after Judge Hew Locke turned down 2 defense requests. Arrived to hear the judge's rulings on 2 pretrial motions. Mr. Zundel had wanted the judge to drop the charges on the basis of the Canadian Charter's guarantees of free speech and opinion. However, Judge Hewlock threw out that request saying such freedoms are not absolute, but there isn't an unbridled right to say what you think. Mister Zundel's other request involved the questions his lawyer wanted to put to prospective jurors. As the charges involve publications containing allegations against Jews and Freemasons, defense lawyer Douglas Christie wanted to keep both groups off the jury. He felt they wouldn't be able to provide impartial judgment in such a case. Before jury selection began, judge Hugh Locke denied a request by defense lawyer Doug Christie to put 9 questions about the holocaust to prospective jurors. The judge also ruled banning Jews and freemasons from the jury would prevent a large portion of society from taking part in the trial. Judge Locke said about Zundel, he can't tailor his own jury to suit himself. Defense lawyer Christie said he hoped to ensure an impartial jury. He wanted to ask possible jurors if they are Jewish, if they believe gas chambers were used to kill Jews during World War 2. Christie wondered if his client will get a fair trial. Speaker 1: I think it it is very difficult to get an impartial jury on a controversial question like the one that's an issue here. We'll have to deal with the matter as it arrives.

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

Raul Hillberg, star witness for the prosecution and foremost holocaust expert, admitted under oath that "no written record exists that h|tler ever ordered the mass extermination of the jews" and that there is "no single report about gas chambers or correspondence to prove it" https://t.co/s1yrbWyUVQ

Video Transcript AI Summary
During the trial of Ernst Zundel, the defense lawyer challenged Holocaust expert Dr. Raul Hilberg's testimony, questioning his belief that Adolf Hitler personally ordered the extermination of Jews. Hilberg stated Hitler's order was verbal, with the exact wording unknown, calling it a gap in history. The defense lawyer questioned Hilberg's reliance on a former SS officer's claims, some of which were omitted from Hilberg's book due to their incredibility, such as Hitler witnessing gassings and the claim that 25,000,000 Jews were killed. Hilberg admitted there is no single report proving the existence of gas chambers in Nazi concentration camps, nor correspondence to prove it.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The lawyer representing Ernst Zundel today began challenging some of the testimony given this week by an expert on the Holocaust. The cross examination questions several of the man's statements, including his belief that Adolf Hitler personally ordered the extermination of Jews. Speaker 1: The crown's expert witness, doctor Raul Hilberg, was back on the stand today where he was called to defend many of the conclusions he's made on the Holocaust during 40 years of research. Defense lawyer Doug Christie asked doctor Hilberg how he came to the belief that Adolf Hitler personally issued the annihilation order. The doctor replied, Hitler's order was verbal and thus no one knows the correct wording. It's one of the gaps in history, Hilberg said. Speaker 2: One of the main questions has been, did the Germans deliberately intend to kill all Jews, and did Hitler give the order for such a plan? In court, defense lawyer Doug Christie questioned the fact that the professor quoted a former SS officer 10 times in a book the professor wrote about the Holocaust. Christie said the officer made what the lawyer called incredible claims, like claiming that Hitler witnessed some gassings and that 25,000,000 Jews were killed by the Germans. Professor Hilberg admitted he left out the officer's incredible points in his book. Speaker 0: A recognized expert on the holocaust today admitted there is no single report that shows the existence of gas chambers in Nazi concentration camps. Doctor Raul Hilberg was testifying for the 3rd day at the trial of Ernst Zundel. Speaker 1: Was there a report that anyone was gassed? Hilberg, there's no single report about gas chambers. I can't swear there's correspondence to prove it.

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

Arnold Friedman, a key witness to the prosecution, who was at Auschwitz, testified he "saw prisoners marched towards the gas chambers and saw smoke and flames rise from the chimney" Upon cross examination, he stated he "never actually witnessed any mass executions or gassings." https://t.co/JBiam2jI99

Video Transcript AI Summary
Christie cross-examined witness Arnold Friedman about his nine-month stay at Auschwitz. Friedman testified he watched prisoners march toward the crematorium and saw smoke and flames from the smokestack. Under cross-examination, Friedman admitted he never witnessed mass executions and only guessed at what happened. He agreed the prisoners could have been marching out of the camp. Christie suggested many bodies burned at Auschwitz were Jews who died of disease and starvation. He questioned Friedman about what he saw and knew about crematoriums, suggesting cremation creates no such smoke or flames as Friedman described. Christie is trying to prove Zundel has reason to question accepted beliefs about the holocaust.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In a point by point cross examination, Christie attempted to pick apart the testimony of one of the crown's key witnesses as he questioned what the man saw during a 9 month stay at the Auschwitz concentration camp. On the stand for the second day, 56 year old Arnold Friedman told the court how he watched columns of prisoners march toward the Auschwitz crematorium. Later, he watched smoke and flames pour from the building's smokestack. But under cross examination, Friedman was forced to admit he had never witnessed mass executions. He only guessed at what happened. He agreed that the columns of prisoners could have been marching out of the camp through a gate next to the crematorium. Christie is out to prove that Zundel has reason to question the widely accepted beliefs about the holocaust. He suggested to Friedman that many of the bodies burned at Auschwitz were those of Jews who died of disease and starvation. Speaker 1: Sundel's lawyer, British Columbia attorney Douglas Christie, vigorously cross examined Friedman about exactly what he saw and what he knew about crematoriums. He suggested to Friedman, cremation creates no such smoke or flames as he described.

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

Rudolph Vrba, an Auschwitz escapee, wrote in his memoir that 12,000 jews were killed per day in the camp and he had personally witnessed the gassings. He then testified that his memoir was dramatized and served as an "artistic representation rather than a historical event." https://t.co/4CAOjGX4cD

Video Transcript AI Summary
Rudolf Verba, an Auschwitz escapee, testified about the death camp in the Ernst Zundel trial. Zundel's lawyer, Doug Christie, challenged Verba's 1964 memoir, "I Cannot Forgive," which claimed Auschwitz had a killing capacity of 12,000 per day, double his 1944 report. Verba admitted to dramatizing incidents in the book, calling it an artistic representation. Christie questioned Verba about a human gassing demonstration for Heinrich Himmler described in the book. Verba stated the book was literature, not history. Death estimates for Auschwitz varied, with Verba estimating 2.5 million, a document expert claiming 1 million, and the Polish government alleging 4 million. Christie accused Verba of using memory techniques to maintain consistent lies regarding his mental record of daily deaths. Christie challenged Verba's memory and motives, questioning why his estimate of deaths at the camp doubled in his book compared to initial statements. Verba admitted his book was a compilation of eyewitness reports.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Rudolf Verba, an escapee from Auschwitz, has testified with uncanny precision about what went on in the death camp. Today, the lawyer for Ernst Zundel tested that memory. Doug Christie challenged a memoir that Verba wrote in 1964, which said, among other things, that Auschwitz had a killing capacity of 12,000 a day. This is twice what Verba had reported to authorities after his escape in 1944. Verba admitted that incidents in the book were dramatized. He called it an artistic picture of an event. Doug Christie read from Verba's 1964 death camp memoirs called I cannot forgive. Among the anecdotes, a human gassing demonstration for SS chief Heinrich Himmler. Pressed about the book's accuracy, Verba said it was a work of literature rather than a history book. The jury in the Zundel trial has heard a lot of different death estimates for Auschwitz. Verba himself calculates a grand total of 2a half 1000000. A previous document expert testified 1,000,000. And the Polish government says 4,000,000. No one knows for sure. Verba was telling the court how he kept a mental record of how many Jews went into the Auschwitz death ovens every day. Christie called it a memory technique to keep your lies straight. Speaker 1: A survivor of Auschwitz underwent a tough day of cross examination today in Toronto. Verba found himself under attack for what he claims he saw. Speaker 2: Zandl's lawyer, Douglas Christie, spent the day challenging Verba's memory and his motives. Especially what Verba claims he actually saw. The 2 of them engaged in verbal combat throughout the cross examination. Christie wanted to know why Verba's estimate of the number of Jews killed at the camp doubled from his initial statements given after the war and from the claim he made in his book 20 years later. Vrba admitted that his book entitled I cannot forgive was a compilation of many eyewitness reports.

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

Robert Faurisson, a professor of literature, testified for the defense that there was no physical evidence of gas chambers, mass execution orders, 6 million was a lie, and that the structures that were currently standing at the camps were actually reconstructions. https://t.co/0J9g0UnOAP

Video Transcript AI Summary
Professor Robert Faurisson testified in defense of Ernst Zundel, stating his research led him to believe the Holocaust and gas chambers are historical lies. He recalled finding no soot on a crematorium smokestack at Auschwitz, which he claimed was a reconstruction. Another scholar testified that the number of Jewish deaths in World War II is far less than commonly believed. Faurisson disputed the figure of 6,000,000 Jewish deaths, claiming there's no proof of even one gas chamber and estimating casualties between 200,000 and 350,000, citing the International Tracing Service as his source. Faurisson testified that the "final solution" was a territorial solution, not extermination, and the existence of camp survivors disproves a policy of working Jews to death. He stated there's no document with Hitler's signature ordering mass murder, attributing the belief that 6,000,000 Jews died to rumors and anti-German propaganda. He accused the state of Israel and international Zionists of perpetrating this "historical lie" for financial gain from German reparations.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Christie used his first defense witness to try to substantiate doubts. Professor Robert Faurisson of France's Lyon University told the court his research has convinced him the gas chambers and the holocaust are historical lies. Florissant recalled a visit to Auschwitz when he ran his finger across the smokestack of a crematorium and found no soot. His investigation revealed that the crematorium was a reconstruction, not the original. Speaker 1: It was another day of startling testimony at the trial of Toronto publisher, Ernst Zundel. The court heard from a professor of literature who spoke out in defense of Zundel. The scholar said the number of Jews who died in World War 2 is nowhere near what we've all been led to believe. Speaker 2: Doctor Robert Faurisson disputes the widely held belief that 6,000,000 Jews were killed during World War 2. Said Faurisson in court, it's impossible to sustain any more these fantastic figures. There is not even the slightest proof of even one gas chamber. Porrason testified he believed the casualty figures ranged between 200,350,000. He quoted his source for that estimate as the international tracing service, a group that tries to track down Jews who were displaced during the war. Earlier in the day, Forreston testified he believed the final solution was a territorial solution, not an extermination. Griffin's asked about the testimony of camp survivors who watched fellow inmates being worked to death. Foresall said the fact that there were survivors showed there was no direct policy to work Jews to death. Speaker 3: Morrison calmly told the jury that there is no document with Hitler's signature calling for the mass murder of Jews. He said rumors and anti German propaganda led to what he calls the great historical lie that 6,000,000 Jews died. Griffiths, who committed this fraud? Forrester, the state of Israel and international Zionists. Griffiths, for what purpose? Forrester said for the financial remuneration, the German government was forced to pay.

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

Russell Barton testified on behalf of the defense that during his time stationed with the Red Cross at the Bergen Belson camp,, he saw no evidence to support a German policy of systematic extermination and testified that the deaths were primarily a result of starvation and typhus https://t.co/89HBP9yJpi

Video Transcript AI Summary
After the war, psychiatrist Dr. Russell Bart volunteered at the Bergen Belsen camp for the Red Cross. Upon arrival with the liberating forces, he witnessed 500 daily deaths from starvation and disease. Dr. Barton concluded these deaths did not stem from a deliberate German extermination policy. He testified that he faced widespread criticism for challenging the prevailing view of intentional German killings. He stated some inmates died when British soldiers gave them food they couldn't digest. English psychiatrist Dr. Russell Barton was at Belsen shortly after liberation. Questioned by Zundel's lawyer, he testified that he did not believe the deaths resulted from planned extermination.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Another defense witness was doctor Russell Bart, a psychiatrist who worked as a Red Cross volunteer in the Bergen Belsen camp after the war. When he arrived with the liberating forces, 500 inmates a day were dying of starvation and disease. He concluded that those deaths were not part of a deliberate German policy of extermination. Doctor Barton testified that he was widely criticized for going against the prevailing view that the Germans purposely caused the deaths. He told the court that some of the inmates even died when British soldiers unknowingly gave them food they couldn't digest. Speaker 1: Doctor Russell Barton, an English psychiatrist, was in Belsen concentration camp shortly after it was liberated. Questioned by mister Zundel's lawyer, he said he didn't believe the deaths he saw resulted from planned extermination.

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

Thies Christophersen was sent to Auschwitz as ascientist researching the development of synthetic rubber. Working side by side with the inmates, Christophersen testified that Auschwitz was a clean and happy work camp, and there was no evidence whatsoever of gas chambers. https://t.co/vFPSXjsDZu

Video Transcript AI Summary
In the afternoon, a former German army officer, Theiss Christofferson, testified for the defense. Christofferson was posted to Auschwitz in 1944. He claimed he only heard of mass Jewish deaths there after the war and that he never saw evidence of mass gassings. Christofferson testified that Auschwitz was a clean and happy work camp. He stated he was there in 1944 studying the production of synthetic rubber and talked to inmates almost daily. Testifying through an interpreter, Christofferson said the air at Auschwitz was very clean, with no smell of burning flesh and no evidence of gas chambers.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In the afternoon, a former German army officer arrived to testify for the defense. Theiss Christofferson was posted to Auschwitz in 1944. He said he only heard of mass Jewish deaths there after the war. He said he never saw evidence of mass gassings. Speaker 1: As Thies Christofferson tells it, Auschwitz was a clean and happy work camp. He was there in 1944 studying the production of synthetic rubber, and he says he talked to inmates almost every day. Testifying through a German interpreter, Kristofferson said the air at Auschwitz was very clean. There was no smell of burning flesh, no evidence of gas chambers.

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

Dr. William Lindsey, an American industrial chemist, testified that zyclon B was used for delousing both prisoners and officers, and its application as a mass gassing agent was a physical impossibility. https://t.co/2VCK3TkHji

Video Transcript AI Summary
American industrial chemist Dr. William Lindsey testified about Zyklon B, stating its dangerous properties necessitate careful handling. Regarding a previous witness's claim of handling corpses shortly after gassing, Dr. Lindsey stated this was highly unlikely. He claimed mass gassings, as described, were impossible and that no one was willfully killed with Zyklon B in this manner. Dr. Lindsey also disputed earlier testimony about flames constantly emanating from crematoria chimneys, asserting such intense heat would cause the chimneys to collapse.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Later, another defense witness, Doctor. William Lindsey, an American industrial chemist, took the stand. He described the properties of Ziklon B, hydrogen cyanide, the gas said to have been used to kill Jews at Auschwitz and at other camps. Doctor. Lindsay said what a dangerous gas cyclone b was and how carefully it had to be handled. Defense counsel Douglas Christie then mentioned an earlier witness who had claimed to have handled corpses shortly after the victims had been gassed. Doctor. Lindsay said this was highly unlikely. Asked by mister Christie about mass gassings, doctor Lindsay said it was impossible for it to have happened the way it's described. No one was willfully killed with Ziklon B in this manner. Doctor Lindsey also suggested that earlier testimony concerning flames, day and night shooting out of crematoria chimneys was wrong. He said this would cause a brick and mortar chimney to fall apart.

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

Ditlieb Felderer testified on behalf of the defense that during his 27 visits to Auschwitz, he witnessed an Olympic sized swimming pool, a banquet room, a sauna, a dance hall, and an orchestra that would perform for the inmates. He described the alleged gas chambers as a fake. https://t.co/lCLSUB2nnu

Video Transcript AI Summary
A defense witness, Ditley Felderer of Sweden, likened himself to Voltaire in defending free speech. He claimed that during 27 visits to Auschwitz, he found an Olympic-sized swimming pool, a banquet room, a sauna, and a dance hall where prisoner orchestras performed. He characterized a crematorium as a fake, like a Hollywood stage set. Ernst Zindel has used Felderer's research in his publications. During cross-examination, Felderer was made to read from leaflets for which he had been prosecuted in Sweden, which mock the holocaust and make fun of gassings.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Meanwhile, a defense witness, Ditley Felderer of Sweden compared himself to Voltaire upholding the right of free speech. He said that in his 27 visits to Auschwitz in recent years, he found an Olympic sized swimming pool, a banquet room, a sauna, even a dance hall where prisoners orchestras played for inmates. He described a crematorium as a Hollywood stage place, a fake. Ernst Zindel has used some of Felderer's research in his own publications. In cross examination, Felderer was made to read from some of his leaflets for which he's been prosecuted in Sweden. They mock the holocaust and make fun of gassings.

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

Jewish Prof. Roger G. Dommergue gave written testimony that was presented to the court on behalf of the defense that all that was really known is that 6 million people that didn't exist, died in gas chambers that nobody ever saw, on orders that were never given. https://t.co/3IRH1MrvNl

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker states they belong to an important international Jewish family and their passion is truth. They claim the Holocaust is a complete fake, based on what they describe as a simple technical arithmetic problem solvable by a child. They assert any chemist knows you can't gas 1,000 or 2,000 people at a time with hydrocyanic acid. They cite the American Jewish Yearbook as stating there were 3,003,000 Jews in occupied Europe in 1942, questioning how 6,000,000 Jews could have been killed when only 3,000,000 existed. The speaker contrasts logic and facts with illogic and propaganda, stating they hate propaganda and value truth above all else.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I belong to a very important international Jewish family from by my mother. And I've been very, very interested. And and my only passion, except the piano, is truth. That's why in spite of, the way that my congenials treat you, I don't want to be take part in this, in this real absolute life because I've been working on your case and for his own case these last 6 or 7 years. And I have I know that, the problem for instance of the Holocaust is a is a complete fake because it's very easy to know because it's a it's a simple technical arithmetic problem, which could be solved by a child in a high school. Now any chemist know that you can't, gas people with cyanide acid. Let's call that in English. Hydrogenic acid. Yeah. Hyprocyanic acid. Hydrosonic acid. 1,000 or 2,000 people at the time. It's well known. And, even the most important American Jewish newspaper, like the American Jewish Yearbook, said that there was 3,003,000 Jews, in occupied Europe in 1942. So I don't see how they could have killed 6,000,000 Jews when there was only 3,000,000. So I think anybody can see that. So for you, it's a question of logic versus illogic. Of truth, logic, of course. Or facts versus propaganda. Facts versus propaganda. I thought I hate propaganda. Even if my own mother would tell me such nonsense, I would say my own mother go to bed. Leave me alone. Yeah. What should I say to my engineers even if they are, if they are billionaires, I have nothing to do. I don't care about the universe. Truth is interesting. That's all.

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

Zündel took the stand and testified in his own defense. He explained to the court how his beliefs were formed through years of tireless research in search of the truth and fueled by his desire to rid the German people of the stigma that was a direct result of a historical lie. https://t.co/Dn17WOkYdR

Video Transcript AI Summary
Ernst Zindel portrayed himself as defending the reputation of Germans, which included denying the Holocaust. He arrived in Canada in 1958 and disliked the negative portrayals of Germans in media. Zindel initially believed 6 million Jews were killed, but changed his view after extensive research. He dismissed Holocaust atrocity stories as propaganda and claimed high death tolls in camps like Dachau were due to typhus epidemics. Zindel stated that Dachau had no active gas chambers for humans and that most authorities now agree the gas chamber was never used. He predicted the world would eventually admit that Auschwitz also did not use gas chambers for extermination. Zindel called the Nuremberg trials Germany's darkest hour and introduced writings criticizing the trials. He likened the Holocaust to a rumor amplified over time, useful as war propaganda, but now outdated. Zindel said governments manipulate information during war and people must seek the truth to avoid mental enslavement.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Ernst Zindel portrayed himself today as a man fighting for the good name of Germans. And part of that fight is the denial of the Holocaust. Zindel came to Canada in 1958. He said he found Germans slandered in print and on television. We were cowards, criminals, romantic dreamers, butchers, and colonel Klinks, the butt end of every joke, and I didn't like it. He told the court that the Holocaust was at the center of the anti German bias. Until 1960, he believed that 6,000,000 Jews had been killed. Then after reading widely and interviewing authors around the world, he changed his mind. Referring to some of the holocaust atrocity stories, Zendel said, only someone mesmerized by propaganda could believe in such nonsense. Zindel testified that the high death toll at camps like Dachau was mostly due to typhus and those epidemics came late in the war. There were no active gas chambers for humans, he said. The jury in the trial has seen this military film alleging that a shower at Dachau was used to gas Jews with cycloneb gas. Zindal said that most authorities, including officials at Dachau today, now say that the gas chamber was never used. It took 20 years, he said, to admit that Dachau, Buchenwald, and Bergen Belsen did not have gas chambers, he said. In time, the world would have to admit that Auschwitz and other eastern camps also did not use gas for human extermination. Zindl also said that the postwar Nuremberg trials were Germany's darkest hour, an example of human debasement. Through his lawyer Doug Christie, Zindl introduced the writings of American politicians and jurists of the 19 forties who criticized the trials as a blot on American justice. Zindel said the holocaust is like a rumor that grows wilder each time it's repeated through each generation. He said it served well as war propaganda, but 40 years later, it is time to put that propaganda aside. Speaker 1: Thundel told the jury that we must now realize that every government manipulates information and has censorship in times of war, and that we owe it to ourselves to be informed of the truth or we will be mental slaves even after the war is over.

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

Ivan Legacé, a cremation expert, testified for the defense. He refuted that 4400 bodies were being cremated daily at Auschwitz, claiming it was "preposterous and outside the realm of reality." He stated that the maximum possible number of cremations daily was 184 https://t.co/tU0QthH48O

Video Transcript AI Summary
Ivan Lageis, an expert in crematorium practices, testified about his experience as an embalmer, funeral director, and crematory manager/operator. He had worked with over 10,000 bodies and personally cremated over 1,000. Lageis used flowcharts and fire bricks to explain the cremation process. He then addressed claims about cremation capacity at Auschwitz-Birkenau. Referencing Raoul Hilberg's estimate of over 4,400 bodies per day in 46 retorts, Lageis stated this was preposterous. Based on his experience, he testified that a maximum of 184 bodies per day would have been possible. Regarding claims of 6,000-24,000 cremations per day, Lageis stated that such claims were irresponsible and physically unrealistic. He concluded that science dares to say the Holocaust, as we have heard it, is basically a hoax.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Ivan Lageis was tendered as an expert in the practical aspects of crematorium practice. Lageis worked as a professional embalmer funeral director and crematory manager and operator at the Bow Valley Crematorium in Calgary, Alberta. He had completed 2.5 year funeral services program at Humber College in Ontario, and in 1979 obtained his diploma in Ontario license. In 1983, he obtained his Alberta license. In the course of his career, Lagais had dealt with over 10,000 bodies in his work and had cremated over 1,000 bodies himself. The work involved bodies in a variety of physical conditions from accident and fire victims to people who died of highly contagious diseases. Now he used flowcharts to explain to the jury, which are for a layman, the process of cremation. He brought along fire bricks, and he let them feel it and touch it, lift it. In order to show what kind of material was involved. He also pointed out that these fire bricks are extremely expensive, costing up to $60 for 1 brick. And then he was asked about Holocaust claims of numbers of cremations at Auschwitz Birkenau and Lageis commented on Raoul Hilberg's claiming the destruction of European Jews, 2nd edition, page 978, with respect to the capacities of the 46 retorts in the 4 crematories at Wirgenau and he said, quoting Doctor. Hilberg, the theoretical daily capacity of the 4 Wirgenau crematory was somewhat over 4,400 persons or cadavers, but with breakdowns and slowdowns, the practical limit was almost always lower. Lagasse stated that this claim was preposterous and beyond the realm of reality to claim that 46 retorts could cremate over 4,400 bodies in a day was ludicrous. Based on his own experience, Laguerre testified that it would only have been possible to cremate a maximum of 184 bodies a day in Bergenau. And then he was asked by the defense attorney, my defense attorney, Di Kristi, about Riedlinger who claimed 6,000 a day to be cremated, others who claimed 8,000 people were burned. And some of them said 24,000 were handled a day. To this, Ivan Lagaest, the Canadian crematory expert says, it was irresponsible. These people were irresponsible with their facts because this doesn't even begin to end the reality at all. It is just physically unrealistic. Physically unrealistic. In other words, science dares to say the Holocaust, as we have heard it, is basically a hoax.

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

Zündel commissioned Fred Leuchter, a gas chamber expert, to travel to Auschwitz, Treblinka and Majdanek to conduct a forensic analysis of the alleged gas chambers. He sampled the soil and brick, took measurements, drew floorplans, and sent the samples to a lab for analysis. https://t.co/XeZCb2KgEa

Video Transcript AI Summary
A team including an American gas chamber expert, Fred Leuchter, went behind the Iron Curtain to investigate alleged gas chambers in Auschwitz Birkenau and Majdanek. The team included translators, filmmakers, and draftsmen. They took soil, rock, and concrete samples, documenting everything to prevent claims of contamination or tampering. Each alleged gas chamber was measured, and detailed architectural drawings were made, noting the sample locations. The samples were sent to the Ashland laboratory in Massachusetts for testing. The lab was unaware of the samples' origins to ensure unbiased analysis. The lab director analyzed the samples, and the results proved to be a sensation in court.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I was planning to send an American gas chamber expert, an execution expert called Fred Leuchter behind the then still existing iron curtain to go with an entire team of experts to investigate the alleged gas chambers in Auschwitz Birkenau and Majdanek. And this team did call translators, filmmakers, draftsmen, and so on. And they went to these sites, and they took soil samples, rock samples, concrete samples. They scraped these samples into plastic bags scientifically with rubber gloves, facial masks that there could be no claim for for contamination and documented on each little sample bag, filmed, photographed with an eyewitness present. There's a be no claim of tampering and dated those samples and had compasses so that we knew exactly from where these samples were taken. Each gas chamber or alleged gas chamber was painstakingly measured and it was noted down is for the first time detailed drawings were made architectural type drawings and the location where the samples were taken were noted in those drawings. So when they came back with these samples after some pretty adventurous times to the United States, they submitted these samples to a very famous laboratory in Massachusetts, the Ashland laboratory, and these people did a test on those samples. They didn't know that these were Auschwitz samples or Majdanek samples or Birkenau samples. They thought they were doing some kind of an industrial accident sample. We had to do this because we did not want to have these samples put into question later on, we wanted to have absolutely neutral person, unbiased persons doing this stuff. As was our fortune, the director of the lab did the samples himself in conjunction naturally with some lab personnel, and they proved to be a sensation in my court case.

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

Fred Leuchter's explosive report compiled from his forensic analysis of the alleged gas chambers and gave irrefutable proof that the chambers were incapable of supporting hydrogen cyanide gas for the purpose of mass execution and HAD NEVER BEEN USED AS GAS CHAMBERS https://t.co/KfAltgr9Df

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker states that prior to inspecting facilities, they agreed to clearly report whether the facilities could have sustained gas executions. They brought standard equipment for prison surveys, including a draftsman for measurements. A photographer documented forensic samples taken from Birkenau and alleged gas execution rooms. Samples were tested to confirm visual inspections indicating the facilities never contained hydrogen cyanide. The speaker determined the facilities were not and could not have been gas execution facilities due to their design and fabrication. Requirements for facilities containing explosive and poisonous gas, such as gasketed doors, no windows, gas input/output, temperature control, and explosion-proof equipment, were absent. The buildings were brick and mortar, lacked heat and gasketed doors, and had crematories nearby. The speaker believes that operating such a facility would have resulted in the operators' deaths via gassing or explosion. The speaker read literature and eyewitness reports to understand execution protocols. They concluded there were no valid eyewitness accounts of gassings, stating, "there are no eyewitnesses because there were no gasps."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Mister Zundel and his defense team, prior to my going, that if I did in fact find facilities that could have supported executions, not only whether they did did support the executions, but only whether or not they could have sustained gas executions, I would make that very clear in my report. And that is when I would testify to when I testified in court. With the exception of the video photographer, I brought the same things that I would have normally brought to a prison in the United States if I was doing a survey of their equipment. The draftsman was there to take and verify measurements. The drawings were made on-site and then reproduced when we returned to the United States to document everything we saw. I personally made photographs and photographer, which was not a normal thing for me, was brought to document the fact that the forensic samples that I removed from the facilities, the control sample from the lawsuit facility number 1 of Birkenau, and all of the other samples from the alleged gas execution rooms were properly taken, packaged, and the use of hydrogen cyanide gas for purposes of execution or otherwise. But, additionally, it would be necessary to move remove samples, return them to the United States for testing at an independent laboratory to, in fact, confirm what my visual inspection indicated that these facilities never, in fact, contained hydrogen cyanide. Yes. Speaker 1: What aside from the samples convinced you that these facilities could not have been used then or now as execution facilities? Speaker 0: The samples in my mind were mainly corroborative. The reasons that I determined that these facilities were not or never could have been gas execution facilities are stated in my report. And it does it mainly is concerned with the design and fabrication of these facilities. The requirements necessary in the design of a facility that contains a highly explosive and highly poisonous gas. You must have gasketed doors, no windows, means of getting the gas in, means of getting the gas out, something for heating the gas and the air to constantly keep the right temperature, explosion proof switches, lighting facilities, etcetera. None of these ever existed. We're talking about brick and mortar buildings without heat, with non explosion proof lighting, without gasketed doors, in some cases, without doors at all, and with crematories that opened very close or adjacent to the facility. If these facilities were used for gas execution facilities, if those persons operating the facilities didn't gas themselves to death at the same time that the executeees died, they certainly would have been blown to bits when the gas exploded from a spark arc, in a switch, the heat of a light bulb, other gas approaching and getting into the crematory furnace. I mean, it's just ludicrous to consider that these facilities could have been used as gas chambers. Speaker 1: But we all know from reading the newspapers and watching TV that there's many holocaust survivors who say that they actually saw gassings. They describe them in minute detail, which relative it was they lost, down to the color of the corpses and the color of the smoke coming out of the chimney. How do you respond to these people? Speaker 0: Well, one of the things that was necessary for me to do, Kurt, at the outset so I'd have an understanding of what I was doing was read the literature and alleged eyewitness reports. So I could make a determination of the protocol, which that's a fancy word that we use in terms of executions for determining, for what the actual procedure is for the execution. And I found through these investigations that there was no such a thing as an eyewitness. I have never seen a report that was written by anyone who had a valid description of what could have happened at a gas. So the long and the short of it is, there are no eyewitnesses because there were no gasps.

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

On 8 May 1995, Zündels Toronto residence was set on fire, resulting in $400,000 in damage. A group that called itself the "Jewish Armed Resistance Movement" claimed responsibility for the arson attack. The group had ties to the JDL and Meir Halevi. https://t.co/d8ZqWxR4XQ

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker is standing in the remains of a library in Toronto on Carlton Street, damaged by fire and water. They found a newspaper with the headline "Germany declares for peace. Adolf Hitler addressing the German nation on October 14, 1933." The speaker notes the irony, as Ed Sandall has spent 30 years advocating for peaceful solutions. The fire was started around 5:30 AM when gasoline was poured against the front of the house. Joergen, who was in the building, escaped with the surveillance tapes. The entire 3rd floor, including the library and private borders, is destroyed. What wasn't burned is soggy, and the roof is missing in portions. The rest of the building will be assessed to determine what can be salvaged.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's about 4:30, in the afternoon here in Toronto on Carlton Street, And I'm standing in what was the library, the, reading room as many of you have known, been up here and, read some of the books that is the head up here in the past. But, so many of them now. If it wasn't, for the fire damage, it's the water damage. And it just seemed to have melted together somehow. And, as luck would have it, what do I pick up here? Germany declares for peace. Adolf Hitler addressing the German nation on October 14, 1933. The irony about the whole thing is is basically that's what Ed Sandall has been for 30 years. You know, hoping a peaceful solution, talk it out, and never, violent aggression. And, this is what it's come to. Sometime this morning at 5:30, gasoline poured up against the front of the house, and the house set on fire according to the surveillance tapes from, cameras. Luckily, Joergen, who was in the building at the time, managed to, get himself and the surveillance tapes out Before the building was basically engulfed, the entire 3rd floor with the library and there's private, borders behind us is basically what you see. What isn't burned is soggy. You know. The roof, is missing in portions. The rest of it can be torn down. As for the rest of the building, we have to go through it and see what's left to be safe to start over. And I'm sure this is gonna

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

The Zundel Prophecy https://t.co/NWLyAytvjW

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims that Germany, despite its high education levels and numerous Nobel Prize winners, turned on the Jews due to the Jews displaying racist ethnocentrism, power grabbing, influence peddling, buying of politicians, and dominating public media. The speaker asserts that the percentage of Jews in Germany was higher than the percentage in the United States today. The speaker predicts that the United States will experience "Weimar conditions" and that the solutions to these conditions will mirror those that occurred in Germany.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Nobody has ever analyzed why the German nation did add more Nobel Prize winners and more famous researchers and scientists and was one of the best educated countries in Europe turn on the Jews. Why did these good Germans turn on the Jews who had more Jews living amongst them than even percentage wise living in the United States today? Why was that? Because they displayed the same for racist ethnocentrism, power grabbing, influence peddling, buying of politicians, dominating of the public airwaves and the and the public media in Germany and so on that they display in United States. And I'm not much of a prophet, but that much I can say based on history that in United States, mark my word, you will have Weimar conditions and you'll have solutions to the Weimar conditions that will be very similar to what happened in Germany.

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

Did 6 million really die? https://t.co/mfuVsx4vnE

Video Transcript AI Summary
The International Red Cross had complete access to the camps, estimating total deaths around 271,000-290,000, with about half being Jewish. A 1650-page Red Cross report never mentioned gas chambers. Internees were categorized as Poles, Jews, Russians, and political prisoners. Jews comprised less than 40% of Auschwitz, around 12% of Dachau, and about 30% of Buchenwald. Auschwitz death books indicate 29,000 Jews died there, with more Catholics dying than Jews. The number could be adjusted to 40,000. The Auschwitz death toll was initially claimed to be 4,000,000. The number of dead at Auschwitz was revised in 1989 from 4,100,000 to 1,000,000. Majdanek's death toll was revised in 2005 from 2,000,000 to 78,000, yet the official 6,000,000 Holocaust death toll remained unchanged. The Jewish World Almanac recorded an increase in the world Jewish population between 1933 and 1948, from 15,315,000 to 15,753,000.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Officials from the International Red Cross visited the camps regularly and had complete access to the camps, documented everything, and estimated the total dead from all the camps to be around 271,000 to 290,000. About half of these dead were Jewish. So we are now talking about some 150 to 200000 Jews that died in the German camps, primarily of disease. In the 1650 page Red Cross report, there was never a mention of any gas chambers. There basically were 4 categories interned during the war, Poles, Jews, Russians, and political prisoners, sometimes alluded to as Germans. Jews made up less than 40% of Auschwitz, only around 12% of Dachau, and only around 30% of Buchenwald. Speaker 1: You've got, for example, the death books of Auschwitz, which are the most reliable source. The Soviets confiscated all the information about, nights and death of people living in Auschwitz when they liberated the camp, and those were finally published in the 19 nineties. And those give you a total What is it? 29,000 Jews die in Auschwitz throughout the world. Okay? And you've got somewhat more Catholics die. You've got more Catholics and Jews dying in Auschwitz. And if you wanna say, oh, there's some missing data there, some Jews not registered who died, and so on, well, you can put it up at very most, I would say, 4 40,000 Jews die dying at Auschwitz. Now I don't allow it to go any higher than that. And that is a 100 times less than the 4,000,000 plaque at Birkenau after the war. Soviets put that, totally absurd figure. Speaker 0: Number of dead at Auschwitz was revised in 1989 from 4,100,000 down to 1,000,000. Upon capture by the Soviet Union, original propaganda also claimed that 2,000,000 were murdered in Majdanek, which included 7 homicidal gas chambers. 5 of these 7 have been admitted to never even assert as homicidal gas chambers. Number of dead at Majdanek was revised in 2,005 from 2,000,000 to 78,000, but somehow, the official account of 6,000,000 dead remained unchanged. So what is 6,000,000 minus 4,000,000, minus 2,000,000? The Holocaust is the only claimed genocide where millions can be reduced from the total claimed to be killed, but the total figure always remains 6000000. Several sources, including the World Almanac, Red Cross documentation, the New York Times and the Chambers Encyclopedia shows that the Jewish population recorded does not reflect the testimonials given on the Holocaust. The Jewish World Almanac has been regarded as the absolute most authentic and trustworthy source for the world's Jewish population numbers. And according to the World Almanac, the world population of Jews increased between 1933 1948 from 15,315,000 to 15,753,000.

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

The phrase "6 million jews d€ad" was used over 245 times from 1865 to 1945. NOT ONCE WAS IT EVER TRUE. https://t.co/Pv3gnqkmwE

Video Transcript AI Summary
The New York Times, June 6, 1915, references 6,000,000 Jews, predating Hitler's rise to power. An October 18, 1918, article discusses a $1,000,000,000 fund to rebuild Jewry, stating 6,000,000 souls will need help after the war. On September 8, 1919, The New York Times reported on a mass meeting addressing the killing of 127,000 Jews and 6,000,000 being in peril. A November 12, 1919, article cites 6,000,000 souls facing poverty, starvation, and disease. The New York Times, February 23, 1920, mentions 6,000,000 Jews. On May 7, 1920, it references 6,000,000 facing famine, disease, and death in Central and Eastern Europe. A July 20, 1921, article states Russia's 6,000,000 Jews faced extermination by massacre. The Gazette, Montreal, December 29, 1931, reports 6,000,000 Jews faced starvation.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Sunday, June 6, 1915. This is 18 year before Hitler ever sat from the government. Yes, people. 6,000,000 Jews. The New York Times, October 18, 1918, and the article is called $1,000,000,000 fund to rebuild a Jewry. Now it is 6,000,000 souls will need help to resume normal life when war has ended. The New York Times, September 8, 1919, and the article is called Ukrainian Jews aim to stop problems. Mass meeting he has that a 127,000 Jews are being killed and 6,000,000 on Powell in The New York Times, November 12, 1919, and it reduced to tragically unbelievable poverty, starvation, and disease. About 6,000,000 souls or half the Jewish population of the Earth. February 23, 1920. 6,000,000 Jews. Friday, May 7, 1920. The phone for Jewish Water For Us in Central and Eastern Europe, where 6,000,000 face horrifying conditions of famine, disease, and death. New York Times, Wednesday, July 20, 1921, 12 year before Adolf Hitler ever set for an agreement. Look at that. Russia's 6,000,000 Jews have faced an extermination by massacre. The Gazette, Montreal, December 29, 1931. And the article pretty much speaks up for itself. 6,000,000 Jews faced starvation.

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

We have been swindled by censorship and robbed of the truth. They have manipulated our past so they can control our future. NEVER AGAIN. https://t.co/NwAjjdhZZk

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

David Irving testified for Zündel, stating that"There isn't a shred of evidence that H;tler ordered the mass extermination of the jews" He produced evidence in court that the British psychological warfare executive engineered the gas chamber story as atrocity propaganda. https://t.co/9jOOQhmAiu

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker, once a believer in the Holocaust, now identifies as an "unbeliever." He draws a parallel between his exposure of the Hitler diaries as fake and his current conviction regarding Auschwitz. He claims Paul Norris found evidence in British archives that the British Psychological Warfare Executive initiated the gas chamber story. The speaker quotes archives alleging the Executive decided to broadcast claims of German gas chambers for Jews. He further quotes a 1944 handwritten minute from Victor Cavendish Bentinck, then chairman of the Joint Intelligence Committee, stating the "gas chamber lie" had run its course and suggesting distancing from the story to protect the broader psychological warfare effort. The speaker notes that in 1988, this "hare" is still running.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: He is the most publicized author on historical topics in the English language in the world. The moment when he came out and said that he now believed that the holocaust was a hoax. Speaker 1: And now towards the end of my writing life, I find that I'm having to reexamine one of those other towns, Auschwitz. And it's a very, very painful process because halfway through my writing career, I wrote a book about Hitler, a biography of Hitler, in which I was still a believer. And now I've turned into an unbeliever. And here I am holding up the documents proving that the Hitler diaries are fake. And a few seconds after that flashlight photograph was taken, I was Kienaas Complimentier. I was escorted out of the room about this size in front of the eyes of the world's television cameras right into the arms of, ABC and Good Morning America so that about, two and a half minutes later, I was broadcasting live to the entire United States and completely wrecking Der Sturm's chances of ever selling Hitler diaries over there. It's one of the high points in one's life. And I must admit that at that time, my conviction that that $6,000,000 worth of diaries were fakes was less securely founded than my conviction that I have grown to accept over the last 6 months or so that the other 6,000,000 fake is also unsecurely founded. I am now more sure than ever that there's something stinks about that episode than I was at the time I held up these documents on the Hitler diaries. I was quite prepared a few days later to believe that perhaps the Hitler diaries were genuine, But no one will ever convince me now that what we are told happened in Auschwitz and Trebelinka and Majdanek did actually happen. Speaker 0: That it was allied propaganda rehashed over and over again and unearthed some documents and quoted them widely that the British psychological warfare decision deliberately in the early forties launched this campaign to deflect away from Soviet war crimes. Speaker 1: By doing the work in the British archives that the other historians have not done, Paul Norris has turned up the evidence that our own psychological warfare executive were behind the entire gas chamber story. And once again, we're quoting from the archives. They're in the British archives, how the psychological warfare executive decides quite cold bloodedly and cynically to start putting out over the radio waves the allegation that the Germans have built special gas chambers for gassing the Jews and getting rid of them. And later on in the files, around about 1944, we find the chairman of the Joint Intelligence Committee, who is responsible for the Psychological Warfare Executive, writing a handwritten minute. His name is Victor Cavendish Bentinck, an eminent banker and industrialist, still alive in England now, Lord Portland as he is now, chairman of the Joint Intelligence Committee, writing in handwriting in 1944, words to the following effect. We've had a good run for our money with this gas chamber lie, but really we've got to be a bit careful because eventually, it's going to be exposed, and then our entire psychological warfare effort will be brought down with it. So isn't it a bit isn't it a good time now to distance ourselves from this particular story? We've set the hare running. Now we ought to let it go off by itself. Good run for their money in 1944. And here we are in 1988, and that hare is still running 44 years later.

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

On dated August 27, 1943, Victor Cavendish-Bentinck, head of the British Psychological Warfare Executive, admitted that there was not the slightest evidence that 'gas chambers" existed and that such tales of their alleged existence were employed solely for propaganda purposes. https://t.co/ZtkToNBNlp

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

Atrocity propaganda has plagued our understanding of history for the last 80 years. Everything we think we know is well placed, carefully constructed lie. https://t.co/quvk1QzXUB

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

Tearing down the foundational structures of your own belief system is not easy. It is far less effort to sit back and blindly accept the world around you and the lies that you have been fed your entire life. But it is worth it. But true freedom comes from knowledge. "Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past." -1984 The censorship of information is a method of control. They erase your past to enslave your mind in the present in order to control your future. Yet no amount of money, lies, or force can stop the truth, and if you are willing and unafraid to speak it, no matter what the consequences, we can take back control from the evil forces that prey upon us. If everyone reposts this thread, we can literally change the world.

Saved - October 27, 2024 at 7:03 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared a series of posts questioning the established narrative of the Holocaust. I highlighted various claims, such as the lack of evidence from Red Cross inspections, chemical tests for Zyklon B, and intelligence reports from WWII that did not support the idea of extermination camps. I discussed the experiences of individuals like Paul Rassinier, who challenged the mainstream narrative, and noted discrepancies in death tolls and eyewitness testimonies. I emphasized the importance of scrutinizing both physical evidence and historical accounts while questioning the motives behind the prevailing narrative.

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

The Holocaust, Fact and fiction! 1. The Red Cross inspected Auschwitz in 1944 and found no evidence it was an extermination camp. ⛺️ 🧵 1/16 https://t.co/eJd8F8r0CH

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

In 1988, American execution expert Fred Leuchter examined the “gas chambers” at Auschwitz, and had the walls chemically tested for Zyklon B residue. The test were negative. 🧵 2/16 https://t.co/7OpO5jU1We

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Alan Turing and British intelligence had cracked the German Enigma Code 1942. Meaning they could intercept and read German messages at Auschwitz when spying. 🕵️ They recorded no evidence of Auschwitz being a death camp. 🧵 3/16 https://t.co/3CDj4xZ7sf

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

The CIA was spying on German camps in the 1940’s and did take aerial photographs. There is no evidence from these photographs or their reports that these camps were “death camps” The labels on these photos were added decades later. 🧵 4/16 https://t.co/ctZLUSGXFs

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Paul Rassinier, was French socialist who was also put in “death camp” at Buchenwald. He wrote a few books on his experiences but he was considered a Holocaust denier even though he was a camp survivor… why? His version of the facts didn’t fit the narrative. He claimed the death camp allegations were incredibly exaggerated, and that while being a camp was a horrendous experience, it was not what is being sold today. 🧵 5/16

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

There is no document or official order found anywhere in Nazi or SS communications about a “final solution” to eliminate the Jews. Decades ago historian David Irving challenged anyone to find such a document with the reward of 1k pounds. No one has ever succeeded. 🧵 6/16 https://t.co/17HFyUoMX6

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

There was a simming pool at Auschwitz, a maternity ward, a hospital 🏥, and lots of forensic reports of the use of Zyklon B in the prisoner rooms. No not for extermination but for the purpose of keeping the prisoners alive. This was used as a means to eliminate lice and keep the spread of Typhus under control. Among those SS communications, there are internal reports about keeping the death of the inmates down, and discussion on how to fix the problems. 🧵 7/16

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

The only “death camps” ever discovered were on the Soviet captured side of Germany post WW2. Meaning you have to trust the Soviet communist version of history in order to believe the official narrative. 🧵 8/16 https://t.co/o1Ab3VqrGy

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

One of the initial “death tolls” from the Soviet camp of Majdanek has been reduced from 2 million to 78k…. That’s quite the revision! And many question the accuracy of that 78k figure based on historical records. 🧵 9/16 https://t.co/fKXxFKvprg

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

At the height of the Covid Epidemic 😷, some New York crematoriums were working overtime and able to cremate up to 15 bodies a day! Obviously you don’t have to be a math whiz to figure out that 80 years ago, the Germans would not have been able to do this faster, and it would have taken roughly 69 years to gas and cremate all the alleged victims if they were to actually do it. 🧵 10/16

Video Transcript AI Summary
The facilities at Auschwitz, Birkenau, and Loveland could not have supported executions using hydrogen cyanide, carbon monoxide, or any other lethal gas. Even with generous maximum usage rates for all alleged gas chambers, totaling 1693 persons per week, it would have taken 68 years to execute 6,000,000 people. Therefore, claiming these facilities were capable of mass executions is ludicrous and insulting.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: None of the facilities examined at Auschwitz, Birkenau, or Loveland could have supported or in fact did ever support multiple executions utilizing hydrogen cyanide, carbon monoxide, or any other allegedly or factually lethal gas. Based upon very generous maximum usage rates for all the alleged gas chambers totaling some 1693 persons per week. And assuming these facilities could support gas executions, it would have required 68 years to execute the alleged number of 6,000,000 persons. Promoting these facilities as being capable of affecting mass, multiple, or even singular executions is both ludicrous and insulting to every individual on this planet.

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Didn’t the allies find tons dead bodies on the camps they liberated? Yes. No one is saying people didn’t die. The reality is Germany was fighting a 2 front war, running out of fuel, ⛽️, food and resources, and Typhus was spreading through many of these camps. However there is no physical evidence these were extermination camps used for the purpose of killing Jews. Why would the Germans wait until the middle of a 2 front war to do this? Hitler came to power in 1933. Hitler also signed the Haavara agreement with the Zionist leadership in 1933. This plan was a coordinated effort to relocate the Jews from Germany to Palestine and satisfy both parties. If Hitler wanted to kill all the Jews, why did the Zionist work with him? And why did he sign this agreement? 🧵 11/16

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Aren’t all the people that have questioned the official narrative of the holocaust wackos and Nazis? No not at all. Germar Rudolf- is a chemist who graduated from the prestigious max plank institute Fred Leuchter- is an American execution expert with multiple patents to his name. David Irving- is British historian who was lauded by the masses when his first books were released, and his ability to go through many first hand documents, only to later be destroyed by the mainstream press when he came across these uncomfortable facts. Arthur Butz- is an MIT graduate and has been a college professor at northwestern for decades. His definitive book “the hoax of the 20th century” still holds up even though it was published in the 70’s. Many of these men have served prison time for these statements. They have not changed their beliefs or reports. 🧵 12/16

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

But I’ve seen lots of movies and read books about eyewitness testimony!? Some people have a hard time believing this, but Hollywood is not history. It is story telling. 🎥 Even further most of these stories are based on “historical fiction” meaning the story can be completely made up as long as a few facts are found. 🧵 13/16

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

There have been countless stories of “Holocaust survivors” later exposed as frauds. While this technically doesn’t disprove the official narrative, it’s does provide a lens of the possibilities. Because virtually all the Holocaust stories are based on eyewitness testimony, and not physical evidence, it provides an easy window for anyone to make up these claims. In fact many eyewitness testimonies do not correspond to the physical evidence at all. Some witnesses describe bodies being black and blue after being hit with Zyklon B, however a person gassed with Zyklon B soul have a red/pink body in the aftermath. 🧵 14/16

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

If the office story really was a fraud, the people in control of the media would have to maintain the story for decades, and they would have to make it illegal to question in most of the western world….🌎 Which they have. Ultimately you have to determine if the physical evidence is real, or if the eye witness testimony is real. Are they jailing people because they are wrong, or because they are right? Is it possible that Jews would lie about this in mass? It says specifically in their holly book 📕 the Talmud, they can lie to gentiles. Is it also strange that Protestant leader Martin Luther wrote a book called “on the Jews and their lies” in 1543. He tried desperately to convert them to Christianity but ultimately discovered it was hopeless and wrote about their behavior. You know the media is lying to you. You know the history books are lies. Have you figured out who is doing the lying? 🤥 🧵 15/16

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

If you appreciated this thread, consider donating to this page via buymeacoffee.com/Uncommonsince76 🧵 16/16 I appreciate your support!

Saved - November 24, 2024 at 11:44 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I explore the notion that if the Holocaust were merely a propaganda campaign, it would require strict laws against questioning it and involve intimidation tactics against skeptics. I mention instances of wrongful convictions and the absence of eyewitness accounts to gas chambers. I discuss the portrayal of the Holocaust in education, media, and reparations, suggesting that it serves to instill guilt in Europeans. I also highlight how narratives around the Holocaust could influence immigration policies and international conflicts, questioning the motivations behind these perspectives.

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

If the “Holocaust” was really a propaganda campaign instead of a historical reality, it would need to be illegal to question in western countries… 🧵 1/22 https://t.co/GI1cdc5D7O

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Jewish groups would need to terrorize people that questioned it, like Ernst Zundel. 🧵 2/22 https://t.co/IJH4kGiqey

Video Transcript AI Summary
An explosion occurred early this morning at the home of Toronto publisher Ernst Zundel, believed to be caused by a pipe bomb. The blast, which happened around 4:30 AM behind a garage on Carlton Street, caused approximately $2,000 in damage to Zundel's property and nearby vehicles. The police are investigating, with several suspects in mind. Witnesses described the explosion as powerful, resulting in smoke and flames. Zundel, known for his controversial views on the Holocaust and a collector of Nazi memorabilia, has faced threats and has extensive security measures at his home. A caller claiming to represent the People's Liberation Movement for the Jewish Defense League stated their involvement in the bombing, though the group is unfamiliar to authorities. Zundel is currently facing a jury trial for publishing false news.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Early this morning, there was an explosion at the home of Toronto publisher, Ernst Zundel. Metro police believe a pipe bomb is behind the blast. Speaker 1: It happened just before 4:30 this morning. A device which police believed to be a pipe bomb exploded behind a garage at 206 Carlton Street. That address is the residence of publisher Ernst Zundel. Damage to the building and the car inside was minimal, totaling about $2,000 Homes and vehicles nearby were also damaged slightly by flying metal and wood. This morning's bombing is being investigated by 51 division and the bomb squad. Police say they have a number of possible suspects. Speaker 2: Basically, it sounded like a powerful blast going off or or a a truck or a bus or a fire engine backfiring. And then when you got here, there was nothing but smoke and flames and stuff like that. Speaker 3: The bomb caused about $2,000 damage to Zundel's garage, his car, as well as 3 other cars marked 15 feet away. My girl's killed me. Speaker 2: I was not you know, I don't drive it easily. Speaker 3: Zundul, a collector of Nazi memorabilia, has published material suggesting the holocaust was a hoax. He is a man with many enemies. Speaker 2: With also many friends. Speaker 3: We here at City Pulse received a phone call late last night from someone claiming to be a part of a group called the People's Liberation Movement for the Jewish Defense League. The caller told us his group planted the bomb. Speaker 2: I have never heard of any such organization. We did not have anything to do with the bombing of Ernesto's home. However, I could certainly understand what would motivate some people to carry out such an action. I have Maya Halevi. I would have expected an answer like that. I wish for the day when Prince Zundal's operation will be totally dismantled. I think that'll come long after his operation has been dismantled, I'm sure. Speaker 3: Zundal has obviously been expecting trouble of some sort. His home features numerous security devices, like outdoor video cameras with monitors inside the house, round the clock security guards, iron bars, search lights, and barbed wire. If it's Speaker 2: a warning, it, has made no impression on me whatsoever. Speaker 3: Zindel's jury trial in a charge of publishing false news causing mischief to the public interest in social and racial

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

They would send provocative letters mocking the suicide of your daughter just before your libel Trial, like they did David Irving…. 🧵 3/22 https://t.co/C6lOjpyFBL

Video Transcript AI Summary
Irving received an expensive wreath after a funeral, with a card that read, "truly a merciful death," signed by Philipp Buhler, who had been dead since 1945. Buhler was a key figure in the Nazi euthanasia program, and the message was a disturbing smear aimed at Irving before his trial. Concerned for his safety, he photographed the card before disposing of the wreath. The undertakers were shocked, and the florist later sent a beautiful arrangement, expressing embarrassment over the incident. The man who ordered the wreath had a Middle Eastern appearance. The trial lasted three months, but Irving remained haunted by the incident and how his enemies exploited it.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Irving, you need to have no worries. We handle the arrangements for Admiral Lord Nelson, you know. And they phoned that afternoon after the reception after the funeral, after I'd kissed the coffin goodbye. And I said, Mr. Irving, something rather odd has happened. A reese has been delivered here and it's too late for the service. What shall we do? And I said, well, tell me, is there a card attached? They said, yes, there's a card attached and it's a very expensive reese. It must have cost many 100 of pounds. It's white lilies and white roses. I said, well, please send it around straight away because I will have to thank people people who sent the wreath. And the wreath was delivered by a courier an hour later to my front door. It never came upstairs. I read it and the card downstairs in the street. And I went upstairs and got a camera and took a photograph of the card. The card read, in German I'm I'm sorry. I took a photograph of it. The card read, truly a merciful death, and the signature was Philipp Buhler and friends. That would mean nothing at all to anybody who didn't know the history of the of the Nazis in the Third Reich. Merciful death, Gernard, was the German, the Nazi euphemism for killing the for euthanasia, killing the disabled. Philipp Buller, who had apparently signed this card, had been dead since 1945. He was Hitler's left hand man. He was head of the euthanasia program. He killed himself in 1945 at the end of the war. This was a nasty little smear been sent by somebody with more than enough money to spare aimed at destabilizing me 2 or 3 weeks before the trial began. It was the nastiest thing that has ever happened to me. I'm not going to say that the devil lives that herself was personally involved in this. I was efficiently worried by this that I took a photograph of the card because I thought it may be just a smear of reese today. I hate reese today. Tomorrow, it may be a pipe bomb. So I took a photograph of the card before I destroyed the reese. I phoned the undertakers. They were very shocked. They said, we can't understand how this happened, sir. It came from the Bloomsbury florists. I visited the Bloomsbury florists that afternoon and as I came away from them, they were deeply they were very embarrassed of course and very shocked and they sent around a wonderful wreath of flowers afterwards and, they said the man who bought this wreath, the white wreath, the roses and the lilies, he looked like a he had a Middle Eastern appearance. He looked very well, see, he was very well dressed. As I walked away from the shop, I found myself passing the front door of Deborah Lipstadt's lawyers 100 yards away. It was a very unpleasant experience. The trial lasted 3 months, but I never ever forgot what had happened to Josephine and the use to which my enemies had put it. I'm not going to go into the details of the trial here because it's too complicated to read.

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

They would need to give professionals large Jail sentences to quell more people from speaking out. Historian David Irving- 3 years Publisher Ernst Zundel- 5 years Chemist Germar Rudolf- 2.5 years Professor Faurrison- Fined 10k euros in 1990. 🧵 4/22 https://t.co/AdCLGi6FLg

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

There would be cases of people wrongfully convicted of being Nazi Killers, since it’s all based on eyewitness testimony. Cases like John Demjanjuk, who was exonerated. 🧵 5/22 https://t.co/CnAaKdGlrD

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

A case like Frank Wallace, where he was accused by 11 people of being a Nazi murderer, but ultimately they were all lies… 🧐 Why did all those Jews lie in unison? 🧵 6/22 https://t.co/uOjfk0tT44

Video Transcript AI Summary
Frank Wallace from Chicago recounted how, in 1977, Nazi hunter Simon Wiesenthal accused him of numerous wartime killings. Eleven witnesses claimed he was an SS officer in Poland. Over four years, Wallace faced street attacks, lost friends, suffered two heart attacks, and borrowed $120,000 for his defense. Ernst Zundel contributed several thousand dollars to his cause. In tears, Wallace shared that he was exonerated in 1980 after proving he had worked on a farm during the war, leading to all charges being dropped. The defense aimed to highlight how Holocaust-related accusations can incite mass hysteria.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Another witness was Frank Wallace of Chicago. Wallace told how in 1977, Nazi hunter Simon Wiesenthal accused him of dozens of wartime killings. 11 witnesses testified at his trial that he had been an SS officer in Poland. Over the next 4 years, Wallace said he was attacked on the street and abandoned by friends. He suffered 2 heart attacks and borrowed a $120,000 for his defense. Ernst Zundel gave him several $1,000. In tears, Wallace testified that he was cleared in 1980 when he proved he had worked on a farm during the war. All charges were finally dropped. The defense wanted to illustrate how accusations related to the holocaust can provoke what it calls mass hysteria among the present.

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

There would be no eyewitnesses to the gas chambers… which there aren’t. “There are no eye-witnesses to the gas chambers. I went to Poland totally expecting there to be execution chambers when I got there, I was disheartened with what I discovered and what I had been taught over 40 years.” -Fred Leuchter 🧵 7/22

Video Transcript AI Summary
I went to Poland to inspect the gas chambers, expecting to find evidence of gas executions. To my surprise, I found nothing at Auschwitz, Birkenau, and Majdanek. I had believed in their existence for over 40 years, but now I can't accept what isn't there. Despite numerous eyewitness accounts, I was disheartened to discover that the facilities I expected to see do not exist. There are no films or documentation supporting the claims of gas execution chambers. It's hard to reconcile this with what I've been taught.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: See here and prove that it took place. Mister Lucas wanna just read what actually took place when there were eyewitnesses, thousands of eyewitnesses. Why do we have to sit here and argue on something that's But we've got to keep our eye on the gas chambers. I went to Poland to inspect these facilities totally believing that I was gonna find gas execution chambers. I was totally amazed when I got there. And I was disheartened that I've been taught in school and I believed for over 40 years. Believe it. You still can believe it. You still can believe it. I can't believe what's not there. What what do you mean it's not there? There are no gas execution chambers at Auschwitz, Birkenau, and Majdanek. You can go to the library of films to, the There isn't even a film available. You know, that's the reason why you have to have is, you know

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

You would never hear about the Red Cross documents that states there were no mass exterminations at Auschwitz, and that that the total deaths in all camps are 271k… 🧵 8/22 https://t.co/uX2jtIhuHz

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

The history book publishers would have to be owned and controlled by Jews like McGraw Hill with its partnership with Mossad agent and Ghislaine Maxwells father Robert Maxwell. 🧵 9/22 https://t.co/uZJ1UxtYP8

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

You would make sure every European and American child would read the Diary of Anne Frank at a young age to ingrain the propaganda, and exclude the fact that parts of it were written after her death. “I have here this forensic report which analyzed all 3 of the Anne Frank Diaries and found many of the entries were written in ball point pen ink. 🖊️ This ink only became available in 1951. So either Anne Frank was alive in 1951 or parts of this diary were written by someone else.” -Ernst Zundel 🧵 10/22

Video Transcript AI Summary
I defend my ethnic group and country against the propaganda from World War II, which I see as an extortion racket against the German people, benefiting Zionists financially. This ties into the discussion about the Anne Frank diary. A German forensic examination in 1980 revealed that parts of the diary were written in ballpoint pen ink, which was only available after 1951, suggesting either Anne Frank was alive then or she didn’t write the diary. Regarding the claim of six million Jewish deaths, it's easy to disprove since there weren't that many Jews in Nazi-occupied areas. The West German government pays reparations, but it was established by the Allied forces and lacks legitimacy, as it was handpicked and suppressed opposition parties.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Don't push it. I defend my ethnic group and my native country against the most massive propaganda lie that still lingers on from the 2nd World War. It is an extortion racket perpetrated against the German people, which has netted the Zionists already over a 100,000,000,000 German marks. It is very profitable and the racket is cloaked in humanity and human things. I do want to tie it into your lead into the story with the Anne Frank diary. I've got the book here. Speaker 1: Yep. Speaker 0: Anne Frank diary of hopes. I have your document by the German forensic section of the Bundeskriminaland which has tested in 1980. Many sheets of the 3 diaries and I came up with saying that they were written many parts in ballpoint pen ink which only came on the market in 1951, so the writer of the diary was alive in 1951 so either Anne wasn't the writer or she was alive and the dead. Alright. Speaker 1: Let's get back to this Speaker 0: Germany government document. Speaker 1: Let's get back to this myth Speaker 0: that you say. Speaker 1: That 6,000,000 people Muslim Jews did not die. Speaker 0: Good. Very easy to prove. There were no 6,000,000 Jews in the areas occupied by Nazi Germany. The death Speaker 1: German government, the West German government pay all these billions of of, Deutschmarks in reparation Speaker 0: if it did not feel that there was some validity? Number 1, the West German government is a crystalline government. It was installed by the allied occupying authorities. It was handpicked, and, all opposition parties that could have represent

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

You would exclude from the history books, 📕 that Jews in the US wrote books on the logical basis to exterminate all the Germans. Meanwhile there isn’t one document from Nazi germany discussing the planned extermination of all the Jews. 🧵 11/22 https://t.co/m4MjfHmZsU

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

If the Holocaust was really a perpetuated myth, it would need Jewish ✡️ producers and filmmakers to make movies 🎥 about it year in and year out, but those movies would be “historical fiction” and the viewers would not really know. 🧵 12/22 https://t.co/tWVgCOcP27

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

If it was really a propaganda exploiting tool, even Jews would write about it, like ✡️ Norman Finklestein. 🧵 13/22 https://t.co/IhzZGSaoMM

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

If it was really a financial and psychological weapon, countries that lost the war would pay insane amounts in reparations, but it would never be considered enough… 🧵 14/22 https://t.co/NATAiii0zP

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

If it really was a racket, the amount of “Holocaust survivors” would vary wildly, and even increase over the years…. 🧐 🧵 15/22 https://t.co/lkWCt2xnH8

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

If they needed to conceal documents that had contrary evidence, they would need a ✡️ Jewish person to be the official historian of Winston Churchill. Someone like Martin Gilbert…. 🧵 16/22 https://t.co/DtG7A8JtS0

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

But further, neither Eisenhower nor Churchill would include anything about a Holocaust in their WW2 biographies…. Which they didn’t. 🧵 17/22 https://t.co/cOpYwN0MJW

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Even further, the Holocaust would be used as a way to flood the countries with Immigrants, and say to European people, you can never have your own states again…. “One of the main reasons for perpetuating the Holocaust Myth is to poison European people with a guilt complex. They are never allowed to have national or ethnic pride again, and this is used as the excuse to flood their nation with immigrants.” -Jurgen Graf 🧵 18/22

Video Transcript AI Summary
The exploration of the Holocaust myth reveals its use as political propaganda, linking it to Western immigration policies. Debates often reference the Holocaust to justify welcoming refugees, fostering a collective guilt among Europeans. This guilt undermines national pride and promotes a multicultural society, which is seen as a safeguard against racism. However, the reality shows that massive immigration leads to cultural tensions and ghettos, rather than integration. The idea of a racially mixed future, as envisioned by thinkers like Richard von Coudenhove-Kalergi, is questioned. The technical impossibility of mass gas chambers challenges the Holocaust narrative, suggesting that revisionist research provides a clearer understanding of these historical events.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Folks on a worldwide scale. The deeper I plunged into the origins of the myth, the more I studied its daily use for political propaganda purposes, the more I became convinced of 2 things. The government of the western nations were about puppets dancing on the strip on strings of shadowy hidden forces, and there was a direct connection between the suicidal immigration policy of Western Europe and the gas chamber myth. As I told you, I repeatedly participated in discussions upon the immigration problem after the publication of of my first book. In every one of these debates, my opponents invariably talked about the Holocaust. Now I quote some of the arguments. While 1,000,000 of Jews were being gassed in Nazi Germany, the Swiss government stood eye to eye it by closing our frontiers to the victims of Hitler's racialist theory. Therefore, we have become guilty, and we must never commit the same sin again by sending political refugees from bloodthirsty dictatorships to their certain days. Far from pursuing a more restrictive asylum policy, we should atone for the crimes of the past by welcoming the victims of terror and persecution. I gradually began to understand that one of the main functions of the holocaust lie was to poison the European peoples, not only the Germans and the Austrians, but the rest of them as well with a guilt complex. If the Germans and the Austrians were the main culprits, the other ones were guilty as well because nobody had a stern finger to save the Jews from troubling and Auschwitz. Making accessories to a crime without parallel in history, we were no longer entitled to any form of national pride, let alone of national consciousness. The only guarantee against the new Nazism and the new holocaust was the obliteration of all racial and national barriers, the creation of a peaceful and tolerant multicultural society where there could be no more racism because there were no more races. Yeah. Of course, all this is poor rubbish. While massive immigration of foreign races naturally leads to a certain number of interracial marriages, the bulk of the indigenous people will always stick to their own national and cultural rules, and many immigrants, especially those embracing the Muslim faith, simply refuse to assimilate. Thus, the result of integration is not the obliteration of all national and cultural differences, but the mushrooming of ghettos and the increase of racial tensions, which could sooner or later leads to strife and bloodshed. Regardless of whether a global racing melting pot racial melting pot would be possible or not, would be desirable or not, it's simply not possible. But as a vision, it has existed for decades. Let me quote now what, count Calvin Mowgikal Elkie, founder of the Pan European Union, which was a kind of spiritual ancestor of the European community, wrote in his book, Practical Idealism, in 1925. I quote, the man of the future will be of mixed race. Today's races and classes will gradually disappear owing to the vanishing of space, time, and prejudice. The Eurasian, niggerite race of the future, similar in its appearance to the ancient Egyptians, will replace the diversity of peoples by the diversity of individuals. So who were the shadowy organizations which could use our national governments to adopt a policy reflecting Gordon Huttig Kallergi's ideals? The question is a formulatively difficult one, but far more difficult than the holocaust story. In light of revisionist research, the holocaust legend is now easy to depart. As the purported mass gasings were technically impossible, they didn't take place. Whereas, we can work with sound technical and chemical evidence

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

We would see Jews ✡️ like Alejandro Mayorkas justify opening our borders because he “is the child of a Holocaust survivor.” 🧵 19/22 https://t.co/2c4kGKSiYH

Video Transcript AI Summary
The implication that the language used reflects the sentiments of the 260,000 members of the Department of Homeland Security is despicable. Senator Hawley's adversarial approach is misplaced, as he may not be aware of my background. I am the child of a Holocaust survivor; my mother lost nearly all her family to the Nazis. His tone is disrespectful to me and my heritage.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What I found despicable is the implication, that, this language, tremendously odious, actually could be emblematic of the sentiments of the 260,000 men and women of the Department of Homeland Security, number 1. Number 2, senator Hawley takes a adversarial approach to me in this question, and perhaps he doesn't know my own background. Perhaps he does not know that I am the child of a holocaust survivor. Perhaps he does not know that my mother lost almost all her family at the hands of the Nazis. And so I find his adversarial tone to be entirely misplaced. I find it to be disrespectful of me and my heritage, and I do not

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

We would see our ✡️ Jewish Secretary of the treasury use the emotional aspect of the Holocaust to support a ✡️ Jewish War in Ukraine. 🧵 20/22 https://t.co/sBkHJJNtMf

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

If the Holocaust was a propaganda weapon, there would be many fake stories later exposed as frauds…. 🧵 21/ 22 https://t.co/10VzKf5Vcd

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

If the Holocaust was propaganda, they would just need to do exactly what they are doing… If you appreciated this thread, consider donating to this page via buymeacoffee.com/Uncommonsince76 🧵 22/22 I appreciate your support!

Saved - January 15, 2025 at 12:34 PM

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

In late 1944, there were rumors swirling around that Auschwitz was not work camp but a death camp. ⛺️ The Red Cross investigated this claim and found “no trace of installations for exterminating civilian prisoners.” https://t.co/8H8TUe6NJm

Saved - January 18, 2025 at 6:52 PM

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

An American Industrial Chemist testified that it was impossible to have Mass Gassed people with Zyklon B, in the way it was described. https://t.co/QYMNnSv00r

Video Transcript AI Summary
Doctor William Lindsey, an American industrial chemist, testified about Zyklon B, the gas allegedly used to kill Jews at Auschwitz and other camps. He emphasized the dangers of Zyklon B and the need for careful handling. When questioned about a previous witness who claimed to have handled corpses shortly after gassings, he deemed it highly unlikely. Regarding mass gassings, he stated it was impossible for them to have occurred as described, asserting that no one was intentionally killed with Zyklon B in that manner. Additionally, he challenged earlier claims about flames shooting from crematoria chimneys, explaining that such conditions would damage the brick and mortar structure.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Later, another defense witness, Doctor. William Lindsey, an American industrial chemist, took the stand. He described the properties of Ziklon B, hydrogen cyanide, the gas said to have been used to kill Jews at Auschwitz and at other camps. Doctor. Lindsay said what a dangerous gas cyclone b was and how carefully it had to be handled. Defense counsel Douglas Christie then mentioned an earlier witness who had claimed to have handled corpses shortly after the victims had been gassed. Doctor. Lindsay said this was highly unlikely. Asked by mister Christie about mass gassings, doctor Lindsay said it was impossible for it to have happened the way it's described. No one was willfully killed with Ziklon B in this manner. Doctor Lindsey also suggested that earlier testimony concerning flames, day and night shooting out of crematoria chimneys was wrong. He said this would cause a brick and mortar chimney to fall apart.
Saved - February 10, 2025 at 2:02 PM

@DravenNoctis - Noctis Draven

This is not a post meant to be edgy nor am I hinting at anything. I'm genuinely curious as to the validity of these documents and quotes. I wonder, are these real? I do not know if they are or are not, so I give it to you just friends to decide and inform me. https://t.co/oXWkxWfQwv

Saved - March 20, 2025 at 1:01 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe that the narrative surrounding World War II is deeply flawed. I argue that the Germans fought to protect Europe from a fate similar to that of millions of Orthodox Christians killed by Bolsheviks. I contend that the post-war treatment of Germany was unjust, with significant Jewish influence in the Nuremberg trials and a supposed cover-up regarding gas chambers. I express concern about current geopolitical dynamics, suggesting that Jewish influence persists in global affairs and poses a threat to European nations and the U.S. through immigration and other means.

@Palsvig - Mads Palsvig

The good guys* did not win the WWII. The jewish** Bolsheviks had already in 1939 killed 66 mio Orthodox Christian Russian, Ukrainian, Kosakh and other nationalities. The Germans fought valiantly to save the European nations from a similar fate. We went to war to protect Poland and then after the war handed not only Poland but the entire Eastern Europe to the stark raving mad genocidal Stalin. The Germans were wrongly convicted to pay damage for WWI by an almost entirely jewish contingent of people at Versailles. If the Germans had known that the entire aristocracy in England and thus the House of the Lords were jewish, partly jewish or crypto jews then they probably wouldn’t have let them off the hook at Dunkerque. The British House of Lords have assisted in nearly every genocide and war the Talmud following international banksters have committed. After the war 2400 out of 3000 employees at the Nuremberg trials were jewish. Article 19 and 21 stipulates that they don’t need proof or facts to convict the Germans. Hearsay and unsubstantiated claims will suffice. We now know the jews lied about the gas chambers. Because in 1948 US Military Police Headquarters in Vienna after having conducted a thorough crime scene investigation came with a document: - “no poison gas has been used in any of the camps” - “the next former camp inmate - particularly of jewish descent - who claims poison gas was used will be taken to court charged with perjury”. Then they stopped lying for about 30 years, until they made a fictitious Hollywood mini-series about a made up German family and a made up jewish family in 1978. But it was too late for the 12 million German civilians that were murdered by the Allied forces, Red Army and Polish and Czech civilians from 1945-1948. The Morganthau plan made by jewish Secretary of defense Henry Morganthau to turn Germany into an agrarian society and kill minimum 20% of the population was in 1948 replaced by the Marshall help. The Smith Mundt Act that MSM are not allowed to lie was introduced in 1948. (Obama abolished the Act in 2012). Even the Bank of England and other Centralbanks were (pretended to be) nationalised, because they had clearly been used to finance the war effort. *the war was not Germans vs Russians or Americans vs Japanese. It was ordinary people of the world against the jewish international banksters aka the Talmud following Khazarian mafiya. PRECISELY as is the case TODAY. *In 1940 95% of the Americans did NOT want to go to war against Germany. **95% of Bolshevik leaders were jewish 92% of gulag commanders were jewish 80% of the Cheka leaders were jewish 50% of NKVD bataljons were jewish 100% of Red Army bataljons had a jewish political leader whose job it was to control the officers didn’t get any good ideas such as fighting against those who had murdered 66 million of their fellow countrymen Most of the leaders of KGB (now FSB) were jewish. KGB started and later infiltrated the Mossad. Mossad has infiltrated CIA. The Mossad and Israel have transferred US technology systematically to USSR, China and now Russia since 1948. - this might be why Russia did exactly nothing to help President Assad in Syria and is doing NOTHING to stop the genocide on Christians and Alawites taking place right now in Syria. - this might also explain why jewish Zelenskyy and jewish Putin have kept the war going so long in Ukraine. The info I share here is illegal in Russia. I can only conclude that it must be because the jewish Bolsheviks and KGB still are in charge. But the info I put forward is very important because I fear the Khazarians are trying to take over the European nations and the US by mass immigration and possibly later by invasion. They have already opened the gates for 20 million illegal immigrant young men of military age into the US and Europe. @MedvedevRussiaE @KremlinRussia_E @realDonaldTrump @RobertKennedyJr @RandPaul @TuckerCarlson @RealCandaceO

@wayotworld - Way of the World

What did he mean by this? https://t.co/kV04TjFT76

@Palsvig - Mads Palsvig

https://t.co/ikDnB0wwfx

@Palsvig - Mads Palsvig

https://t.co/hwRXVTrafw

@Palsvig - Mads Palsvig

https://t.co/K8U4p7yJOH

@Palsvig - Mads Palsvig

https://t.co/Ecaytx86Ad

@Palsvig - Mads Palsvig

https://t.co/wfawALQ2kU

@Palsvig - Mads Palsvig

https://t.co/LRFDuD7Mjp

@Palsvig - Mads Palsvig

https://t.co/waiAlCG5Z0

@Palsvig - Mads Palsvig

https://t.co/OGaGEN2fKA

@Palsvig - Mads Palsvig

https://t.co/8Kq85kTtw1

@Palsvig - Mads Palsvig

https://t.co/FdE2oCDPsb

@Palsvig - Mads Palsvig

https://t.co/lY3bmEb98k

@Palsvig - Mads Palsvig

https://t.co/qvQXHlVvkn

@Palsvig - Mads Palsvig

https://t.co/Pi0NEKbXuu

@Palsvig - Mads Palsvig

https://t.co/51Y8j6N0tX

@Palsvig - Mads Palsvig

https://t.co/BQG12gxNYy

@Palsvig - Mads Palsvig

Rothschild and little Charly https://t.co/l8Ziz4yjsl

@Palsvig - Mads Palsvig

Another Rothschild and Charly "good goy" https://t.co/RthEL75SIc

@Palsvig - Mads Palsvig

How do they finance all the wars and bribe all our politicians and journalists to this day: https://t.co/F8eleU0q8z

@Palsvig - Mads Palsvig

https://t.co/88qltltL9Y

@Palsvig - Mads Palsvig

https://t.co/vVvZwOfH8O

@Palsvig - Mads Palsvig

https://t.co/bQGU6TR2vf

@Palsvig - Mads Palsvig

https://t.co/nXPcLYuWRs

@Palsvig - Mads Palsvig

Every Accusation is a Confession: https://t.co/f2bVzekioQ

@Palsvig - Mads Palsvig

https://t.co/2IqPPorLUj

@Palsvig - Mads Palsvig

There has been found not a single German plan to exterminate the jews. However....every accusation is a confession: https://t.co/3sQ3Wqmxvf

@Palsvig - Mads Palsvig

https://t.co/4sYxf3ljAQ

@Palsvig - Mads Palsvig

https://t.co/kTVmNUa0Az

@Palsvig - Mads Palsvig

https://t.co/4CSlfcnSLu

@Palsvig - Mads Palsvig

https://t.co/WDyxN9at98

@Palsvig - Mads Palsvig

https://t.co/8UGKFTo5LH

@Palsvig - Mads Palsvig

https://t.co/Qossd2dDzp

@Palsvig - Mads Palsvig

https://t.co/FUuHLxAD55

Saved - April 9, 2025 at 1:12 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared some thoughts on the Jewish population statistics, noting that the CIA reported 8-14 million Jews in the U.S. in 1976, while the global population was around 16.6 million in 1939. I questioned the commonly cited figure of 6 million Jewish deaths during the Holocaust, pointing out discrepancies in historical data. I also expressed skepticism about the current population of 15.7 million, suggesting that assimilation alone can't account for the difference. Lastly, I stated that what some call "Holocaust denial" is simply a rejection of established facts and evidence.

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

1. It is forbidden to count the jewish pop. 2. CIA reported 8-14 million inside US in 1976 3. jew pop was 15.7 in 48/15.3 in 33 4. "6 million jews d€ad" was used 245 times from 1865 to 1945. Not once was it true. 5. Red Cross tracing service totaled 271k You lose jew. https://t.co/PaJYbBucUm

@Isacb2021 - Isac

If anyone explain this convincingly , I will become a Holocaust denier 1. In 1939, the global Jewish population stood at approximately 16.6 million. 2. If the Holocaust hadn't occurred, and we apply even a conservative population growth rate of 1.5%, the global Jewish population today would be almost 60 M 3. Today there are 15.7 M Where did the millions go? Assimilation doesn't explain it. Try it Cyan

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

There is no such thing as "holocaust denial" There is only the denial of facts, evidence, and reality. https://t.co/nlmBeOyXOv

Saved - May 6, 2025 at 12:32 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Since Auschwitz is trending, I want to share perspectives often overlooked in mainstream discussions about the Holocaust. I highlight claims from Holocaust Revisionists, including David Cole's observations on gas chamber inconsistencies and the lack of documented orders for mass extermination. I also discuss the conditions in camps, the inaccuracies in survivor stories, and the propaganda surrounding the Holocaust narrative. Ultimately, I believe in the necessity of open dialogue about historical events, emphasizing that the truth can withstand scrutiny.

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

🧵Since Auschwitz is trending let's talk about something you won't hear about on the official Auschwitz tour: The perspective of the Holocaust Revisionists (aka Holocaust "Deniers") These are all facts they didn't teach you in grade school about the Holocaust...

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

First, here’s a jewish man named David Cole on the inconsistencies of the gas chambers (ie. wooden doors and other illogical constructions) David is surprised “how little evidence there is" for many of the events https://t.co/oyRbuPVxPs

Video Transcript AI Summary
Claims are made that proofs of the Holocaust are few, consisting mainly of eyewitness testimonies and postwar confessions, but no wartime documents detailing homicidal gas chambers. Evidence like piles of human hair, shoes, and clothing are explained as normal byproducts of camp conditions. Zyklon B was used for disinfection against typhus. Aerial photos of Auschwitz taken during the alleged period of nonstop killings do not show gassings or bodies being burned. Auschwitz's gas chamber appears to have been reconstructed after the war. Allied aerial photos contradict claims that Nazis camouflaged the gas chambers. Forensic examinations of gas chambers at Auschwitz showed almost no Zyklon B residue, unlike disinfestation chambers. An expert examined the facilities and determined they were incapable of supporting hydrogen cyanide gas executions due to design flaws: no gasketed doors, windows, or explosion-proof features. The design of the facilities made gassing impossible without killing the operators. Alleged eyewitness reports lack valid descriptions of gassings, suggesting there were no gassings.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I know from years of my own research and the research of others that proofs of the holocaust are few. Literally, all there is are the eyewitness testimonies and postwar confessions. There's no picture, plan, or wartime document dealing with homicidal gas chambers or a plan to exterminate the Jews. And we can't use the excuse that the Nazis destroyed all the evidence because after we had broken the German code, we were able to intercept their secret transmissions, including those that came from Auschwitz. The key to understanding the Holocaust story is understanding the true nature of the things passed off as proofs. Everything that is used as evidence of the Holocaust also can be said to have a perfectly normal explanation. For example, these exhibits are said to be the material proofs of exterminations. There's the piles of human hair. But what does that prove? It's acknowledged that each inmate had his or her head shaved because of the lice problem. That's not denied. So why wouldn't there be piles of human hair? What about the piles of shoes and clothing? Is that a proof? It's a fact that the prisoners were issued a uniform upon arrival, including shoes. So why wouldn't there be piles of inmates' shoes and clothing? It doesn't prove anybody was killed. What about the canisters of gas? No one denies that Zyklon B was used to disinfect clothes and also buildings. Zyklon B was one of the premier pest control agents in Europe at that time. It was present in most of the concentration camps, including those that are not said to have had homicidal gas chambers in them. The typhus epidemic that spread throughout Europe during the war and also spread through the camps called for stringent lice control procedures. So what other proofs are offered? Well, there's the usual pictures of sick inmates, which proves the groundbreaking thesis that people got sick in the camp. Once again, I'll add that nobody denies the typhus epidemic, which resulted in many deaths. Then there's the artwork and the pictures of children. But at this point, it's looking pretty bad for somebody looking for objective proofs of the gas chamber. And some of the proofs they present actually work against the concept. For example, they have one of several aerial photographs taken of Auschwitz by the Allies during the war. They don't mention, however, that when blown up, these photos don't show people being gassed or bodies being burned even though they were taken during the time killings were said to be going on almost nonstop. Once inside, we can see why revisionists have had such a field day with this building. Obvious marks on the walls and floors where apparently walls had been knocked down, equally obvious holes in the floor where bathroom facilities had been. We maintain that unlike the large hollow chamber we now see. This room had once been five rooms, including a bathroom. Yet the building does have what appears to be evidence of criminal usage, four holes in the ceiling, which lead to the roof where four little chimneys stand. It is said that through these four holes, cyclone B crystals were dropped. And indeed, there seems to be no other explanation for them. Do these holes prove homicidal gassings? Revisionists have claimed in the past that these holes were added after the camp's liberation and that the inside walls were knocked down and the bathroom facilities removed to make the room look like a big gas chamber. Let's start again talking about this building here. Speaker 1: Notorium gas chamber. Speaker 0: But this is a reconstruction. Speaker 1: It is in original state. Speaker 0: Original? Speaker 1: Original state. It is in original part. Original. It is original. Original in through this chimney was from cyclone beam. Speaker 0: Are those the original holes in Speaker 1: the ceiling? Speaker 0: They've been rebuilt? Yes. Okay. After the war? After the war. Yes. This is Auschwitz Birkenau in an allied aerial photo from September 1944. The train that would come up carrying the doomed inmates, you would have thousands of inmates being marched off the trains into one of these two gas chambers in full view of the entire camp. This was a spectacle that nobody at the camp could miss. They would see thousands of people marching into those buildings and nobody coming out. These were gas chambers that were not isolated from anyone. And indeed, when these aerial photographs were released in the late seventies, they contradicted many supposed eyewitness claims about how the Nazis had tried to camouflage the gas chambers at Birkenau. Another question that should be asked, is there any Zyklon b residue in the gas chamber knowing that cyanide gas would, in fact, leave a residue? In 1988, execution equipment expert Fred Lucher conducted forensic examinations on the gas chambers at Auschwitz to answer that question. He took samples from the four gas chambers at Birkenau, the one at the main camp, and the control sample from one of the disinfestation chambers that we know did use Zyklon B. Now the gas chamber samples showed almost no appreciable traces, whereas the disinfestation sample literally went right off the scale. In 1990, the Institute of Forensic Research in Krakow decided to conduct their own forensic tests to see if they could refute Fred Lucher's findings, and their own tests got back the same results. Speaker 2: With the exception of the video photographer, I brought the same things that I would have normally brought to a prison in The United States if I was doing a survey of their equipment. The draftsman was there to take and verify measurements. The drawings were made on-site and then reproduced when we returned to The United States to document everything we saw. I personally made photographs and produced a great deal of photographic evidence of the hardware and facilities that we found in Poland. And the video photographer, which was not a normal thing for me, was brought to document the fact that the forensic samples that I removed from the facilities, the control sample from the Lausing facility Number 1 of Birkenau, and all of the other samples from the alleged gas execution rooms were properly taken, packaged for and packaged for submission to the laboratories. I examined the facilities, and I made a determination that they were incapable of supporting the use of hydrogen cyanide gas for purposes of execution or otherwise. But additionally, it would be necessary to move remove samples, return them to The United States for testing at an independent laboratory to, in fact, confirm what my visual inspection indicated, that these facilities never, in fact, contained hydrogen cyanide gas. Speaker 3: What aside from the samples convinced you that these facilities could not have been used then or now as execution facilities? Speaker 2: The samples in my mind were mainly corroborative. The reasons that I determined that these facilities were not or never could have been gas execution facilities are stated in my report. And it does it mainly is concerned with the design fabrication of these facilities, the requirements necessary in the design of a facility that contains a highly explosive and highly poisonous gas. You must have gasketed doors, no windows, means of getting the gas in, means of getting the gas out, something for heating the gas and the air to constantly keep the right temperature, explosion proof switches, lighting facilities, etc. None of these ever existed. We are talking about brick and mortar buildings without heat, with non explosion proof lighting, without gasketed doors, in some cases without doors at all, and with crematories that opened very close or adjacent to the facility. If these facilities were used for gas execution facilities, if those persons operating the facilities didn't gas themselves to death at the same time that the executees died, they certainly would have been blown to bits when the gas exploded from a spark arc in a switch, the heat of a light bulb, or the gas approaching and getting into the crematory furnace. I mean, it's just ludicrous to consider that these facilities could have been used as gas chambers. Speaker 3: Well, we all know from reading the newspapers and watching TV that there's many holocaust survivors who say that they actually saw gassings. They describe them in minute detail, which relative it was they lost, down to the color of the corpses and the color of the smoke coming out of the chimney. How do you respond to these people? Well, one of the things Speaker 2: that was necessary for me to do, Kirk, at the outset, so I'd have an understanding of what I was doing was read the literature and alleged eyewitness reports so I could make a determination of the protocol, which that's a fancy word that we use in terms of executions for determining, for what the actual procedure is for the execution. And I found through these investigations that there was no such a thing as an eyewitness. I have never seen a report that was written by anyone who had a valid description of what could have happened at a gassing. So the long and the short of it is there are no eyewitnesses because there were no gassings.

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

Next, let's take a look at how German confessions were obtained through torture, the infamous human lampshade and soap claims, and one of the more interesting Holocaust facts: No document has ever been found showing Hitler ordered any systematic mass exterminations https://t.co/bOLWqwZMXG

Video Transcript AI Summary
Cyclone B was dropped into the death chamber, killing people in 3-15 minutes. The screaming stopped when they were dead. Special commandos removed rings and extracted gold from teeth. Children were exterminated because they couldn't work. Rudolf Herr's confession was obtained by the British through torture before he was turned over to the Soviets and Poles. This was confirmed in "Legions of Death" by Bernard Clark, who bragged about torturing Herr and threatening his family. The speaker wishes the Fuhrer had taken responsibility for his commands, stating he was their sovereign. The speaker would rather die than see the sovereign subjected to humiliation in a foreign court, believing the Fuhrer would have taken responsibility.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Cyclone b dropped into the death chamber from a small opening. It took from three to fifteen minutes. We knew when the people were dead because their screaming stopped. After the bodies were removed, our special commandos took off the rings and extracted the gold from the teeth of the corpses. Children of tender years were invariably exterminated since by reason of their youth, they were unable to work. Is that all true and correct, witness? Yes. Speaker 1: It was the British who obtained by torture the confession of Rudolf Herr's commandant of Auschwitz before turning him over to the Soviets and Poles. This has been confirmed in a book published in 1983 titled Legions of Death, which contains the recollections of British Sergeant Bernard Clark, who brags about having tortured Hearst get a confession out of him and of threatening his family. It was here that Hearst was hanged. Speaker 0: I rather wish the Fuhrer had stood by his followers and taken the responsibility for his command. Think of his position. Oh, sure. His position is chief war criminal. Right? He was our sovereign. It would be intolerable for me to have him standing before a foreign court. You men knew the furor. He would be the first one to stand up and say, I gave the orders, and I shall take full responsibility. And I would rather die painless than have the sovereign subjected to such humiliation.

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

Now, let’s take a look at the evidence against the gas chambers and mass graves as well as some of the numeric anomalies of the Holocaust The first clip is Fred Leuchter who wrote an infamous report called The Leuchter Report that comprehensively examined Auschwitz

Video Transcript AI Summary
According to multiple experts, the facilities at Auschwitz, Birkenau, and Lublin were not capable of supporting mass executions using any lethal gas. Germa Rudolf's chemical analysis allegedly concluded that Hydrocyonic Acid was not used in buildings claimed to be homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz. Walter Liftel's report stated that homicidal gassings were impossible for technical reasons. William B. Lindsay affirmed that no one was purposefully killed with cyclone B in that manner. Reports from the Krakow Forensic Institute and others corroborate these findings. Ground-penetrating radar at Treblinka allegedly revealed no ash or disturbance, suggesting mass graves never existed there. Charles Larsen found no evidence of death by poison gas in autopsies performed in German camps. No Prussian blue cyanide staining was found on walls in the alleged death chambers, only in delousing chambers. The Auschwitz Museum curator allegedly admitted that the Soviets altered a German bomb shelter after the war to create a homicidal gas chamber. The building presented as a gas chamber has features inconsistent with that purpose, such as a manhole escape hatch, a door that opens inward, and locks on the inside. Le Express acknowledged that everything about this gas chamber is false and that it is a deceitful postwar reconstruction. Olga Vorum Sarnikot stated Auschwitz had no gas chamber, and a fake chimney was built by the Soviets.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: None of the facilities examined at Auschwitz, Birkenau, or Lublin could have supported or in fact did ever support multiple executions utilizing hydrogen cyanide, carbon monoxide, or any other allegedly or factually lethal gas. Based upon very generous maximum usage rates for all the alleged gas chambers totaling some 1,693 persons per week and assuming these facilities could support gas executions, it would have required sixty eight years to execute the alleged number of 6,000,000 presses. Promoting these facilities as being capable of affecting mass, multiple, or even singular executions is both ludicrous and insulting to every individual on this planet. Speaker 1: Germa Rudolf is a chemist who knew winter of nineteen ninety-ninety one while working towards a doctorate in chemistry at the renowned Max Planck Institute for Solid State Physics in Stuttgart, began a scientific investigation of the credibility of the Leuchter Report. His detailed chemical analysis concluded that Hydrocyonic Acid was not used in the buildings alleged to have been homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz. His report strengthens the findings of Fred Leuchter. The prominent Austrian engineer, Walter Liftel, also made a report concluding that the homicidal gassings were impossible for technical reasons and because they are incompatible with observable laws on nature. Liftel's report is further authoritative confirmation of the findings of Fred Loister. The American research chemist Doctor. William B. Lindsay also made careful examinations of the alleged gas chambers. After thirty three years of experience as a chemist, he declared and affirmed under oath, I have come to the conclusion that no one was willfully or purposefully killed with cyclone B in this manner. I consider it impossible. The Krakow Forensic Institute, Robert Farison, Fredrik Turban, Jan Ball, Carlo Matano, Jurgen Graf, Anne Sundal, David Macaldon, and many others who also have carried out similar technical inspections of the alleged gas chambers have come to the same conclusion. A brave Jewish revisionist named David Cole made a groundbreaking documentary called Cole in Auschwitz in 1992. Today, are many future length documentaries, analyses and commentary on the German labor camps. In 1999, Ricker Creek, a qualified electronics engineer, and his team of researchers carried out a high-tech exam of the soil in the alleged death camp Treblinka. Using ground penetrating radar for three weeks, the team found that the ground was never even disturbed, and core samples revealed no ash. The results obtained show with 100% certainty that mass graves never even existed in Triplinka or Belzec. There are, in fact, many mass graves in the East. However, this was where the Soviets massacred people. Today, it is well known that, for example, the Katy massacre was committed by the Soviets, but was blamed on the Germans after the war. Doctor Charles Larsen, one of Americans leading pathologists as part of a US war crimes investigation team, performed more than 1,000 autopsies of the dead bodies in the German camps, and none showed any evidence of death by poison gas. If there had been gassings with carbon monoxide or cyanide, the indications would have been extremely dramatic and readily visible. The courses would have been bright sherry red. No Prussian blue cyanide staining was found on walls in the alleged death chambers. Only in the delousing chambers are ample amounts of evidence of gassings, where cyclone B was used on clothes and bedding to stop the spread of typhus. The Auschwitz Museum curator admitted that the Soviets created the homicidal gas chamber after the war by altering a German bomb shelter. In the bomb shelter presented to us as a homicidal gas chamber in Auschwitz, the communists removed the walls and made the infamous cyclone b holes in the roof to make it look like a real gas chamber. Speaker 2: Yeah. Now when you go into that Cream of One building, you're gonna see it. It just looks kinda weird. It has all these dirt mounds all around it. You know, really, it looks like a a bomb shelter, and that's exactly what it was at the end of the war. It was a bomb shelter. They want you to think that 4,000,000 people went through Wash Woods, and they made it look like all the people went through that camp there. But that building there was not capable or made for gassing people, alright, at all. I mean, you know, you go inside it, they they they chop holes in the roof at the end, and it's just ridiculous. I mean, there's no way people were were killed in that building. So they want you to believe that this is the building that people were gassed in. It just wasn't feasible that people were gassed in that building. Speaker 3: The thing now, that building, where they end the tour, that was never a gas chamber. There was a chimney next to it and there were four holes in the ceiling where the Zyklon B granules would be dumped and people would see the holes and they could explore them and look around. What I did in 'ninety two, I interviewed the man who was the director, the curator, for lack of a better word, of of the camp. And he admitted to me on camera, not a hidden camera shoot. It was a open two camera shoot in his office. It was me and my camera woman. And he admitted on camera that the building displayed as the gas chamber is not in its original state, that when the Soviets liberated the camp, that building was an air raid shelter, a very obvious, very clear air raid shelter. And then the Soviets remodeled it to look like what their conception of the gas chamber is. Now there's no backup evidence to prove that this building was ever a gas chamber. There's no Zyklon blue cyanide staining on the walls. There were no four holes in the roof to dump in the Zyklon B. The Soviets added those. There there had been dividing walls. Inside the room, the Soviets knocked those down to make it look like one big open chamber. They ripped up the bathroom facilities. You can still see the drains in the floor. You can still see the holes where the toilet and the sink had led into, but they took out all the facilities and they carved a doorway where there had not been a door to make it look like there was a progression from the gas chamber to the oven room. But there was a lot of stuff that they didn't bother to cover up. There's a gigantic manhole right in the middle of the gas Speaker 2: chamber. Yeah. Speaker 3: A manhole that any adult, even a fairly heavy set adult can go down into. Now what that is, that was an escape hatch, was fairly standard design procedure that underground or partially underground bomb shelters would have an escape hatch in case rubble or anything else prevented the people inside from exiting the bomb shelter through the main door. So you have this manhole that no one had noticed for at that point, Auschwitz, when I went there in '91, Auschwitz had been open to the the West for over a decade. No one ever noticed the damn manhole, and it's right there clear as day. The door to the chamber opens in. In other words, if you if it was a gas chamber and you stuck people in there and they they would all pile up against the door trying to bang their way out, they would die there. In order to open the door again, you'd have to push against a mound of 50, a 200, three hundred bodies. The, the door locks on the inside, not the outside. In other words, the the victims would be able to lock the Germans out, which which is just kind of a a silly thing to think of. Speaker 1: In January 1995, the prestigious French weekly magazine, Le Express, acknowledged that everything about this gas chamber is false and that it is in fact a deceitful postwar reconstruction. French Jewish Olga Vorum Sarnikot wrote a book about the National Socialist concentration camps in which she stated Auschwitz, which was to remain the model camp and simultaneously the administrative center, had no gas chamber. A fake chimney was also built by the Soviets in 1947. It has no opening, and it is not even connected to the building. German prisoners were Speaker 0: also

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

Next, David Irving discusses the lack of sufficient combustibles for cremations, the Germans making no references to gas chambers in private or public documents, and the fact the gas chambers on the Auschwitz tour are “reconstructions” and not original https://t.co/v9a0A8b9PV

Video Transcript AI Summary
According to a reader's letter, calling a gas chamber a fake is wrong because it's a reconstruction. The speaker equates the reconstructed gas chamber to a fake $20 bill. The speaker claims authorities have been showing a reconstruction to schoolchildren for 50 years without disclosing it's not original, which he believes is deceptive. He was fined for pointing out this embarrassment. The speaker questions why the fake building is shown when genuine ruins are nearby. He suggests people might question the crematorium's true purpose, possibly for typhus victims. While acknowledging crimes against Jews, he argues about the scale and intent. He questions how 1,000,000 people could be cremated in Auschwitz, citing the implausibility of the required coke supply being absent from aerial photos and records. He claims archives haven't been properly researched and it would have been impossible to remove all gas chamber references from records at the end of the Third Reich. British intelligence read German secret messages, including those from the commandant of Auschwitz, which detailed prisoner statistics but contained no reference to gassings. He dismisses eyewitness evidence as insufficient without archival support, referencing the John Demianuk case.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: By academics around the world. He then goes on in his readers letter to say, it is also totally wrong to call that gas chamber a fake. It's a reconstruction. If mister Irving doesn't know the difference between a reconstruction and a fake, then he shouldn't call himself a historian. So said this reader's letter in the New Zealand Herald three days ago. To which my to which my response is to which my response is, a fake, like the bomb scare that's just been telephoned to this hotel. That is a fake. If this mister Rubin was to offer me a reconstructed, a reconstruction of a $20 bill, I don't think I'd accept that. That is what I would call a fake. If for fifty years, the authorities in Auschwitz have been showing a building to busloads of shuddering school children from all over Europe, telling them that is the gas chamber where the Nazis killed millions of Jews. And if they haven't had the honesty to write in big letters above the door, what you are seeing is just a reconstruction on the basis of eyewitness testimony, then that is a fake. They have concealed the fact that it's a reconstruction which makes it a fake. And I'm fined $22,000 for pointing this fact out because it's an embarrassment. Of course, it's an embarrassment. The embarrassment is, of course, why do they show the schoolchildren the fake building here when allegedly there were genuine gas chamber ruins just down the road three or four miles away? Well, that's because people start asking questions. They say this is odd, ruins of a gas chamber, but I think according to maps I've seen this was the crematorium, not a gas chamber at all. Four crematorium in Auschwitz because they had immense typhus problems. They had epidemics with tens of thousands of the inmates dying, which is a crime. And anybody who says to me, David Irving says it wasn't a crime, what happened to the Jews in Auschwitz or elsewhere, is also doing me an injustice because there was undoubtedly a crime. But we're arguing about scale. We're arguing about intent. We're arguing about the how how and the why and the wherefore. And this is what we are not allowed to do. This is what questions like, how do you cremate 1,000,000 people in Auschwitz? If cremating one person takes 40 to 60 kilograms of coke, that means that to cremate 1,000,000 people is gonna take 40 to 60,000 tons of coke. And where are those 40 or 60,000 tons of coke? They are not visible on any of the aerial photographs, nor are there truckloads of coke being driven up, nor are there railway lines bringing in the wagon loads of coke. So that is, pre opacity by itself, improbable. And anyway, these four crematory, we know exactly what their handling capacity was, how many cadavers could be cremated at a time. We know they couldn't have cremated more than tops seventy, eighty, 90 thousand people in the four or five years that the camp was in existence. These are the technical questions that people ask. And not only that, you have the problem that people say, no doubt the Nazis destroyed all the records. At the end of World War two, everything was destroyed, of course. That's what the Nazis were like. They covered their tracks. Well, ladies and gentlemen, I'm obnoxious historian who's worked for fifty years in the archives, and those archives have still not been properly researched. They're still in total disarray. And believe me, it would not have been possible in the last one or two weeks of the collapsing Third Reich for somebody to go around all the archives taking out all the references to gas chambers if they were in it, or all the references to the final solution if there were any, and destroying. They couldn't defend it. And even if they could have destroyed all the German records relating to the final solution and all the German records which contained the fatal word gas chamber, so that there aren't any left in the archives now in Germany, they couldn't. The Nazis have destroyed what is in the British files. Because you see, we British were reading the German files. We were reading the German secret messages. When the commandant of Auschwitz Concentration Camp sent a message to Berlin reporting what he was doing, giving the actual daily statistics of how many prisoners were arriving, how many were leaving, how many were in the camp at midnight, how many had died. We have those code messages in Britain. Those actual code messages from the commandant of Auschwitz, we know what he reported. And the chief historian of the British Secret Service who printed this in volume two of the official British history of the Secret Service as an appendix. He states, it's quite evident that huge numbers of people died in Auschwitz Concentration Camp from typhus epidemics, from illness and disease. A small number died from execution being executed by hanging or shooting. And then he goes on to say, there is no reference in the intercepted telegrams to anybody being gassed. No reference at all. Hundreds and hundreds of code telegrams and the top secret SS code, and there's no reference to anybody being gassed in Auschwitz. These are the kind of documents which mean something to me as a historian. And that is why when people say, but what about all the eyewitness evidence? I say eyewitness evidence baloney. Tell that to John Demianuk about eyewitness evidence, the man, the Cleveland Auto Worker, who was nearly hanged in Israel on the basis of eyewitness evidence until the Jewish judges in Israel, this Israeli Supreme Court said this evidence was not good enough. They themselves had to acquit John Denyano, admitting that eyewitness evidence alone was not good enough, and that the eyewitnesses had erred and that they had identified the wrong man. Eyewitness evidence is not good enough if there is a total lack of collateral evidence in the archives. And here we have to say there is no such evidence. The Auschwitz record

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

With so many Holocaust survivors telling stories of the camps many have turned out to be inaccurate From the infamous Elie Wiesel to the lady who claimed to be raised by wolves, here’s just a few of the Holocaust claims that have turned out to be flawed https://t.co/CYo2SSoypX

Video Transcript AI Summary
Captured Nazi officials and Jewish survivors gave Holocaust testaments, including claims of gassings, Jew-eating animals, vaporizing Jews with atomic energy, torture to the "Tango of Death," steaming Jews, electrocution, musical camp dogs, tickling homosexuals to death, blood gazers, Jews made into lampshades and soap, and Nazi masturbation machines. Herman Rosenblatt gained fame for his story about a girl throwing him apples in a concentration camp, which led to a book and movie deal, but the story was false. Rosenblatt maintained it was his "imagination" and remained unrepentant. Other false Holocaust narratives include Mitig Grocer plagiarizing from fiction, Josef Hurt fabricating an escape from Auschwitz, Otto Utkinant lying about his experiences, and Misha DeFunsheca's fabricated memoir about being raised by wolves. Misha had to repay $22.5 million. Miklos Gruner claims Elie Wiesel stole the identity of Lazar Wiesel and that Wiesel's claims about burning babies are scientifically impossible. Paul Rasinier and other camp survivors denied knowledge of gas chambers or mass murder. Benedict Kochsky stated he never saw gas chambers in any camp, including Auschwitz. Marika Frank, an Auschwitz internee, testified she saw nothing of gas chambers. Jewish writer Gerrard Menounin called the Holocaust "the biggest lie in history." Jewish professor Norman Fiegelsang said the Holocaust deflects criticism of Israel. Jewish chief rabbi Aria Friedman called the Holocaust a "successful historical fiction." Jewish professor Roger de Margo claims gassing with cyanide acid is impossible and that the numbers of Jews killed are inaccurate.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The actual Holocaust stories comes from two sources: the captured high officials of the National Socialist Party that were coerced and tortured during the Nuremberg trials and the actual Jewish survivors that came out of those concentration camps. These Jewish testaments ranged from gassings, Jew eating bears and eagles in cages, vaporizing 20,000 Jews near Auschwitz with atomic energy, torturing and killing Jewish prisoners to the tempo of a specially composed Tango of Death. Steaming Jews to death like lobsters at Treblinka, electrocuting them to death, musical camp dogs ripping Jews who played false in the orchestras to death, homosexuals being tickled to death, gazers of Jewish blood, Jews being made into lampshades and soap, carts on rails that threw Jews into the ovens directly, Nazi masturbation machines and yeah, additional testaments that were given are just as ludicrous. Speaker 1: The one thing Speaker 2: that I'll never forget that I heard, and he said, the Nazis are taking our our young Jewish infants, and they're tearing them in half by their legs, and they're throwing them in the nester. The nester is a river. So they said, for every person that's gonna take their lives, they're gonna torture to death five of us. Then they punished us. For every man that ran to the wire. They they took a hundred inmates, and they killed them in front of everybody. The greatest love story we've ever told on Speaker 0: this show. Oh my goodness. Speaker 3: Herman Rosenblatt received international attention for his story about being a hungry little boy in a Nazi concentration camp who was thrown apples every day by a little girl on the other side of the fence. Years later, according to the story, Rosenblatt met that same girl on a blind date in New York City, and he proposed on the spot. Speaker 2: I used to come by every day, bring the apple, have in my jacket and a piece of bread, and he used to say, I'll see you tomorrow. Speaker 3: The story landed Herman and Roma Rosenblatt on Oprah twice and in newspapers all over the world. They also got a book and movie deal, but the story wasn't true. Why did you do it? Why did you tell such a big lie to so many people for so long? Speaker 4: It wasn't a lie. It was I it was my imagination. And in my imagination, in my mind, I believed it. Even now, I believe it. That she was there, and she threw the apple to me. Speaker 3: How how can you say it wasn't a lie? It it wasn't true, and and you know it's not true. Speaker 4: Yes. It's not true. But in my imagination, it was true. Speaker 3: Members of his own family say his real motivation was money. Herman and Roma Rosenblatt told their false story publicly for more than a decade, but it all fell apart about six weeks ago after Holocaust scholars proved that it was physically impossible for prisoners to approach the fence at the concentration camp where Herman was kept and that Roma's family was actually more than 200 miles away at the time. Rosenblatt is remarkably unrepentant about his years of lying. Speaker 4: I pronounce my love for you forever. Speaker 3: When you look at that, does it make you uncomfortable at all? No. You think that was the right thing to do? Speaker 4: Yeah. Speaker 3: And and and while you were up on the stage there with all these people, in the back of your mind, you not thinking I'm not telling the truth here. No. So if you had to do it over again, would you tell the same story? Yeah. You would? Yes. Speaker 2: I simply don't know what to say. I mean, it's his imagination, but he knows it's not true. Speaker 3: He said he made up he made up a fantasy world, and he was living in that fantasy world. Speaker 2: And his son says, tried to stop him? Yes. Good heavens. Okay. Thank you, Dan. Pleasure. Speaker 0: Mitig Grocer towards Sweden talking to children, telling them of the horrors of the German concentration camps. It turned out that his story was directly plagiarized from a fictional book called Mila 18 from 1961. Josef Hurt from Pennsylvania gave public speeches for years where he claimed to have escaped from Auschwitz and even met evil Nazi doctor, Josef Mengele. He had now confessed that he had fabricated the entire story. He admitted that everything was a lie. Hurt had even tattooed a fake prison number on his arm to make people believe in his lies. Otto Utkinant had for years been paid shekels to lecture in German schools about his experiences of the Holocaust. He has talked about the Crystal Knight, how he lost 72 relatives including mother, father and sister and how he himself was interned at Buchenwald. However, Otto now admits that the whole story was a lie. Misha DeFunsheca wrote a best selling memoir about her experience of the Holocaust. Her story was published almost twenty years ago as Misha, a Memoir of the Holocaust Years. The book describes how when she was six, her Jewish parents were taken from their home by the Nazis and how she set off across Belgium and Germany and Poland to find them on foot, leaving out stolen scraps of food until she was adopted by a pack of wolves. She also claimed to have shot a Nazi soldier in self defense. The story became a huge bestseller and was even made into a film in France. But in 02/2008 it was found to be fabricated and everything was a lie. The author whose real name was found to be Monica de Valle said that it is not the true reality but it's my reality. There are times when I find it difficult to differentiate between reality and my inner world. Misha will now have to pay back the money she was awarded, which amounts to $22,500,000 Elie Wiesel has told us for fifty years that while at Auschwitz he was tattooed on his left arm the number A7713. He also adds that his father was given the number A7712, but a real Auschwitz survivor, Miklos Gruner claims that Elie Wiesel is an impostor. Miklos who actually was at the camp claims that Elie Wiesel stole the identity of a real man named Lazar Wiesel who the number eighty seven thousand seven hundred thirteen actually belonged to. First of all, if you look at his arms, Elie Wiesel does not have a tattoo. The number 8700712 actually were given to a man named Abraham Wiesel, Lazar's older brother. Eli Wiesel never claimed that he saw any homicidal gas chambers, instead he claims that he witnessed evil Germans throwing Jewish babies in gigantic flames sleeping up from a ditch. But this has also been debunked by scientists, historians and engineers. Auschwitz was built on a swamp with a high water table which made it impossible for bodies to have been burned in ditches. Not to mention that it was impossible for human bodies to be totally consumed by flames in this manner because of lack of oxygen. Miklos however says that he never saw any ditches where children were burning. Eli Wiesel explains that some events do take place but are not true. Others are, although they never occurred. In 1986, Miklos Gruner met Eli Wiesel in Stockholm. Miklos thought that he was going to meet Lazar Wiesel. But after the meeting Miklos said, I was stunned to see a man I did not recognize at all. He was not my fellow prisoner. Miklus also was surprised that Eli couldn't speak Hungarian, but spoke English with a strong French accent, even though Huizel claims that he was born in Hungary. Neither Elie Wiesel nor his father, Shlomo Wiesel, are named in any records from Auschwitz or Buchenwald. After the war, Elie Wiesel joined the Jewish terrorist group Irgun. Anyway, Elie Wiesel is today laughing all the way to the bank as his best selling book Night brought him international recognition at millions of dollars. He even won the Nobel Peace Prize in 1986. Out of thousands of real Jewish survivors from the German camps, the international Jewish community handpicked Zionist and hate filled liars to spread anti German propaganda. But of course, not all Jews are lying. Many Jews don't agree with the Holocaust narrative, and many of them testified that they never saw any mass murders or gassings. But these Jews have effectively been silenced by anti free speech, signist organizations to cover up the truth. Paul Rasinier was arrested by the Gestapo in October 1943 and deported to Germany, where he was held prisoner until the end of the war in Buchenwald and Dora Concentration Camps. Rasinier was upset by the many lies and myths about the concentration camps that were being circulated. French resistance members who also were interned in various German concentration camps during the war including Auschwitz and other alleged death camps, they all gave accounts of their treatment by the Germans and they all denied any knowledge of gas chambers and a mass murder program in the camps. Rysigner said that never at any moment did the responsible authorities of the Third Reich intend to order or in fact order the extermination of the Jews in this or any other manner. Maria van Herwarden testified about her camp experience in a Toronto District Court in March 1988. She testified that she witnessed the deaths of many fellow inmates by deceased and particularly typhus, and she saw some take their own lives, but she saw no evidence at all of mass killings, gassings or of any extermination program. The Jew Benedict Kochsky, who spent the years from 1938 to 1945 in concentration camps, three of these in Auschwitz, said: I was in the big concentration camps in Germany. I must truthfully state that in no camp have I ever seen anything that might have resembled gas chambers. A Jewish woman named Marika Frank arrived at Auschwitz Birkenau from Hungary in July 1944, when 25,000 Jews were supposedly gassed and cremated daily according to the official story. She testified after the war that she heard and saw nothing of gas chambers during the time she was interned there. Jewish writer Gerrard Menounin says, the Holocaust is the biggest lie in history. Germany has no blame for the second world war. That Jewish pressure has inflicted laws on democratic societies to prevent questions and incessant promotion and indoctrination of the same advertently inconsistable Holocaust proves it must be a lie. Why else would no one be allowed to question it? Jewish professor Norman Fiegelsang says, the Holocaust proved to be the perfect weapon for deflecting criticism of Israel. The Holocaust may yet turn out to be the greatest robbery in the history of mankind. Jewish chief rabbi Aria Friedman says, the Holocaust is a successful historical fiction. Jewish professor Roger de Margo said Speaker 1: I know that the problem, for instance, of the Holocaust is a complete fake because it's very easy to know because it's it's a simple technical arithmetic problem which could be solved by a child in high school. Any chemist know that you can't gas people with cyanide acid. Let's call it that in English. Hydrocynic Hydrocynic acid. 1,000 or 2,000 people at the time, it's well known, and, even the most important American Jewish newspapers, like the American Jewish Yearbook, said that there was 3,003,000 Jews in occupied Europe in 1942. So I don't see how they could have killed 6,000,000 Jews when there was only three millions. You know, they So I think anybody can see that. I I listed in 1944. I see. I listed for three years, nineteen forty four. It was in the world. The world finished in 1945. But I was in the army 1944 because, of course, as everybody did, I believe that Hitler was the real monster that everybody said he was. But since I have studied what happened in Nazism, under Nazism, what Hitler did want to do and say when you read these books, what maybe anybody can read Mein Kampfel can read myth of the twentieth century by Rosenberg. And anybody can know also what happened these last fifty years when declared I absolutely had nothing to do and not the slightest influence because Nazi has been there now for fifty years. So you can do what happened. And what happens, I told you in my my lecture, it's absolutely incredible. And at the top of everything, you can see the Jews. I told you, I studied the books which really expresses Nazism, that is to say, Meigumpf and the myth of the twentieth century by Rosenberg. As to what's happened during the war, and especially what Hitler actually did, which is hidden, which is concealed to us. What what he did in Germany. And the only know thing we know about Hitler is that he killed 6,000,000 Jews who never existed in gas chambers, which nobody ever saw. That's all that's the only thing which people know about Hitler. But when you really know that this what he did, what he actually did in Germany, well, when you have studied all that, you see that you have been completely completely misled to use a Speaker 0: mild

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

Next, what was life was like inside the “death” camps? Well, surprisingly, the camps had theaters, swimming pools, soccer leagues, orchestras, and even plays But don’t take my word for it, let some Holocaust survivors tell you themselves: https://t.co/Samxwpo3Au

Video Transcript AI Summary
Cultural activities occurred in Auschwitz, including theater performances in Block 1. A grand piano was brought in, and a stage curtain was sewn with inmate assistance. One inmate helped transcribe music for the orchestra, finding the work peaceful. There was a library, newspapers, and violin quartets. Movies, mostly German, were shown in the evenings for a fee. Inmates could receive money from outside and buy items like cigarettes and weak beer at a canteen. Soccer teams were formed, with games organized even in Gross Rosen as the war progressed. Civilians sometimes helped, even playing soccer with inmates. Weddings and maternity wards existed, with over 3,000 live births in Auschwitz and no infant deaths during German rule. A nursery was established, and an inmate painted a mural in the children's barracks, depicting a Swiss chalet scene and, at the children's request, Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs. The children then created a play based on Snow White. A brothel, hospitals, and dental facilities also existed in the camp. Camp authorities tried to keep inmates alive and healthy.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We also had an orchestra where some of the musicians stood together and one musician was so good that he had the instruments playing and he wrote the notes. So later on we had a band who played over the weekend. And, that was, of course, helping us. You know, we also did plays and stuff. Speaker 1: Were there any cultural activities happening in Auschwitz? Yes. I told you we had a piano put into a not just a piano, a grand piano was brought into Block 1. Once that was built, that new block, the downstairs room was assigned for theatre. When he wanted to build a stage curtain in that new Block 1, which was one big dining room was going to be also with the stage, so performances could be done for women there, culture. He said, for heaven's sake, isn't there anybody here who can help me sew on these curtain rings for the stage. I do it for you, he says. And I came forward and I helped him with the curtain stage. And that was wonderful because I had a man sitting across me for a change. And my room mate is in charge of work assignments. And if you happen to know music, what instruments do you play? I said, I learned piano, but not good enough for an orchestra. I can tell you that right now. He said, well then maybe you know the notes. I said, yes. He said, well then I can use you because we have to write it from the original music piece what the director gets to the instruments. And so for each instrument has only short line on the whole paper. So I had to take it apart and write for each instrument. From that what I had to do. I had to even make the lines. We didn't have paper that was pre printed for notes, nothing. So I spent the whole day there for a while until we were taken away from Auschwitz. But then she saw me work there, I had a big table where I could work and lay out all the paper and it was very peaceful and relaxing. And wanted to talk more to me. That is when I met that SS man at one time. That was the last job I did while I was in Auschwitz. And when I the other job that when I was in Block 10, we went out to pick the leaves. And from these leaves, they would make tea for the whole camp, for the whole Auschwitz. Speaker 2: How did you entertain yourselves? Speaker 3: Well, there were at that at at the beginning of those days, there was a library where you people could get books to read. There were newspapers that we could get. And that and also among ourselves sometimes we had a violin quartet used to come and play in barracks. And they even later on, they said they're gonna build a movie in the camp. And the prisoners said said, only you must be crazy. They're make a movie for us in in in the camp. And then it happened. They made a movie in the camp. Yeah. And we we went in barracks after barrack. We we could go to see a movie sometimes in the evening. They brought movies in to the in the evening. And Speaker 2: What kind of movies would they show? Speaker 3: German movies. Once I came to the main camp, they were allowed twice a month to ride home. Once a postcard and once a letter. Speaker 2: They gave you the materials? Speaker 3: Yeah. They gave us the letter, the materials, and we could Speaker 2: How did Speaker 1: you get the stamps? Speaker 3: Stamps. We could buy stamps. Speaker 2: Could You had money? Speaker 3: Yeah. We got my we still got my with the money we got through the Jewish community from Vienna who sent us. Everybody, you some money. Speaker 2: And and in the camp you could have currency? Speaker 3: Yeah. They could have money because there was in camp also what they call a cantina and not many times, but once in a while they sold a few cigarettes or they sold something, whatever they had. So if you had money, you could buy in that cantina there. Food, there wasn't really any food really. They usually sold and sometimes they sold they sold some weak beer that sold also in the in the yeah. But not really anything else, not much. Mostly cigarettes. Speaker 2: And when you went to the movies, did you have to pay? Speaker 3: Yes. We had to pay. After the the money stopped, the regular money stopped, we got paid in coupons then. Speaker 2: Paid for your work? Speaker 3: Well, I don't know if it was for whatever. We got paid for in coupons for which were redeemable in the in that canteen if they had something. So that was their their way of distributing money then to everybody, everybody got this money then. Speaker 0: Of course what we did is for the weekends we got together, we got a group of us together and we made a soccer team which was about a little later where we Speaker 4: played soccer. It's amazing that there would be a soccer team, that there'd be Speaker 3: enough energy left to do something like that. Speaker 0: Well, I don't think we were quite as energetic as we were with the other regular team, but we did something to, you know, it kept our mind off these, of the problems we had. Speaker 5: Especially the Germans started losing the war, 1943, '19 '40 '4. So 1944 we had soccer games in Rosrose. Soccer teams, we organized very well, soccer teams, each nationality organized a soccer team and we organized our equipment and everything to play soccer in the assembly line and assembly place. In Rosen. In Gross Rosen. So, you know, that much free it was in there, but it was like the 44. Russians already pushed away, Americans already invaded on the other side, so there they have to give more freedom. But that was much more freedom and food didn't improve very much because simple reason, they didn't have it very much themselves. Speaker 6: Did the civilians try to help you at all? Did they trade goods for things? Speaker 5: It's as I say, we have almost everything, what we wanted, whether it's soccer teams, from the civilians, from Markside civilians. But that Speaker 3: was Speaker 5: strictly under the cover. They knew it but they didn't do much about it because they knew the war was almost all of us. They didn't, they even played soccer with us. Just to make the store funny, the toy incident funny that one time the Polish team played against German teams and one of the top enlisted assessment decided he wants to play for the Polish team. So we say okay, you can play for us. And then the commandant, SS commandant, he was like a captain. He decided to want to play for the German team. So, he went in the field. I think they were a little bit tipsy. Speaker 6: How did you feel about that? Speaker 5: And the funny part of it, we said, you just let them play, they play almost by themselves. We just run around them. But that was one of the incidents which stuck so funny in it. But that's happened, it was 1944, it almost things came to close. Speaker 6: So, what you're saying then that the closer the end of the war came, pressure was let up rather than becoming more cool? Speaker 5: In our camp, you did feel the pressure made up. Speaker 7: There were weddings and even maternity wards for pregnant women. Inmates were falling in love and getting married in the camps. Over three thousand live births were registered in Auschwitz alone, with not a single infant death while it was in operation under German rule. The evil Nazis even set up a nursery for the children. Speaker 8: Freddie Hirsch called me to the children's barracks he was heading then, and he asked me if I could paint something on the wall for the children. And I said, well, if you can get the materials, he said, I'll get the materials. I said, okay. And then a very handsome young blonde man from the men's camp came over one day. And Freddie Hirsch called me to come and meet him. And he asked me what I need. So I said, well, if I can get any wall paints, so any tempera paints, I would like those. If you can get me some, and he said, yes. Anything you want. And so before I knew it, Freddie had the stuff ready for me, and I started painting. At first, not knowing what, I looked at that huge drab. It was kind of olive colored like all the barracks were wall. And I thought, well, the thing to do is to make it look like we are in a Swiss chalet on the deck, and there is a balustrade with flowers and flower pots on it. And we are looking out at the beautiful meadows and maybe see some cows and sheep and stuff, and I started painting. And then afterwards, far in the distance, I was putting some sheep and some cows, and then I noticed that all the kids were standing around me, behind me. So I turned around and I asked them if they would do they have any special wish what to put in that meadow? And they said, Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs. And that was a very surprising answer. So I made a painting of Dopey standing on another dwarf's head with a cloak around him so he looked like a tall guy, so he would be as tall as Snow White. And they were dancing together, and the shoes, those soft shoes and everything. And the kids loved it. And I made some other dwarves around, one who was playing the accordion. I think there was Grumpy, the mean one. And the professor with the glasses. I made almost all the dwarfs standing around. Some of them were clapping, and that's what the kids like. I now understand that there was another painter who continued something painting on the walls after I've left. I don't know about that. Speaker 9: When you were in the process of doing that Speaker 8: Yeah. Speaker 9: What did it do not only for for you, but for the for the children Speaker 8: on on an emotional level. Well, it did several things, not just emotional, but the children then wrote a play which was a satire of Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs. So I figured out a way of making a crown out of paper, and the kids were painting it gold and putting, like, jewels on it. And then I took some paper strips and I painted them with a black paint. And I don't know about the costumes, what what they made costumes out of, but the play was very successful because the little girl who was, playing Snow White had an incredible voice, a gorgeous soprano, just like the one that you hear in the movie. Speaker 9: How were they allowed to put on a play in Auschwitz? Speaker 8: I don't know, but it was done kind of quite hush-hush, all of it, except that when it was put on, suddenly some SS men appeared and they watched. And then when Arnold Behm put on that play, he he wanted something like a Wardville Wardville play, which I was into. That was when I couldn't stand the breath of the guy who was playing with me. Speaker 7: The building just left entering Auschwitz was actually a brothel used by the internees of the camp. Hospitals and camp dental facilities attended by camp inmates, dentists and nurses to deal with the inmates dental problems. The Auschwitz Camp had sick bays and hospitals where thousands of inmates were cured. The camp authorities foremost the garrison physician doctor Wirths tried all imaginable ways to keep the Auschwitz inmates alive, strong and healthy. The Holocaust Speaker 0: is

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

Here's David Irving again, this time he discusses Hitler’s apprehension against using nerve gas on Allied soldiers This is unique because it apparently shows Hitler had a double standard for using nerve gas in the camps... https://t.co/uS94qkuQSv

Video Transcript AI Summary
Hitler embargoed the use of poison gas, as evidenced by a document signed by him, references in the German high command vows, verbatim references by him, and shorthand records of meetings. If Churchill had used poison gas on German cities, the Germans would have won the war because they possessed nerve gases like sarin and tabun. In 1944, Germany had stockpiles of 30,000 tons of these nerve gases. Had Hitler used them in Normandy, it would have ended the Allied bridgehead because Allied gas masks were ineffective against German nerve gases. Hitler, despite being able to gain a strategic advantage by using nerve gas, did not because he signed the Geneva Gas Protocol, which forbade him from using gas first.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And embargoed anywhere the use of poison gas. It's it's there. The actual document signed by Hitler, the references in the vows of the German high command, the verbatim references by him and the shorthand records of his meetings, the shorthand records of meetings in the German air ministry. The Fuhrer has absolutely forbidden the use of poison gas. The enemy is to use it first, and then we will retaliate with ours. The reason being, the reason that makes this yardstick so extraordinary is that if Churchill had done what he was threatening and dropped the poison gas on German cities, the Germans would have won the war because the Germans had not just poison gases like mustard, the Germans had nerve gases. At this time, in 1944, they already had stockpiles of 30,000 tons of nerve gases, sarin and tabun, the famous nerve is being used even now by the Russians in Afghanistan and in Iraq and in Angola and elsewhere where the Russian troops are fighting. The nerve gases sarin and tabun, Hitler already had stockpiles of 30,000 tons, and nobody found out till the war was over, which is just as well because if Hitler had ever used it in Normandy, fighting the Allied, the American, the French, the British troops in Normandy, the Canadians as well, it would have been the end of the bridgehead because we didn't have a gas mask. We had no gas mask which would have stopped the German nerve gases. It would have been the end of the bridgehead. And isn't it strange that Adolf Hitler, the devil incarnate, had the means whereby he could have secured an immediate strategic advantage, which would have turned the war because he would have pulled the nine or 10 panzer divisions out of Normandy and sent them to the Russian front. And with those high grade divisions, he would have wiped the floor with the Russians and ended the war by Christmas nineteen forty four. But he had put his name on a piece of paper, the Geneva Gas Protocol, saying that he would never use gas first because it would be a war crime.

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

Ok, we're almost done... This next clip discusses the propaganda after WWII, the rising and falling Auschwitz death tolls, and the history of the 6 million number But most importantly: It shows the tactics of violence and intimidation used against Holocaust "Deniers" https://t.co/UYbRl3kmQZ

Video Transcript AI Summary
During World War II, the Soviet Union was a military ally whose anti-Nazi propaganda was accepted and later integrated into historical accounts. One speaker states their belief that 6,000,000 Jews were killed in the war by Adolf Hitler and the Nazis. They then ask another speaker, the president of Iran and a scholar, if he believes that 6,000,000 Jews were killed by the Nazis, or if he thinks that is not true. The other speaker says he doesn't think 6,000,000 Jews were gassed, and cautions that this statement is against the law in Germany, and could result in imprisonment.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I think it's necessary to put this matter in its proper historical perspective. You see, we live in a time now when the old Soviet Union has fallen apart, and it's now okay for both liberals and conservatives as well as everybody else to speak ill of the departed communist state. But it was not always that way. During World War two, the Soviets were more than just a military ally. Their anti Nazi propaganda was readily accepted by the other allies because it served all of their purposes. The point is that as the victors, the Soviets got to commit their propaganda to the history books as fact. With the 2020 hindsight we now have, the knowledge of Stalin's despotism, and the KGB's history of misinformation and deception, as well as the other camps in Poland, Majdanek, Belzec, Kelno, Treblinka, and Sobibor, we've had to rely on the Soviets for most of our information. Speaker 1: I believe in the inarguable fact that 6,000,000 Jews were killed in the war by Adolf Hitler and Nazis. I'm merely asking you, as a president of Iran and as a scholar, do you believe that 6,000,000 Jews were killed by the Nazis, or do you think that is not true? Speaker 2: But I don't think 6,000,000 Jews were gassed. Now be careful. I I beg of you. This is against the law in Germany. If there was a German somebody that's in German state, you could have me thrown into prison before I leave Germany. I hope that's not your intention.

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

And last but not least, let's take look at how the Holocaust narrative is still used to this day and why it's so important that it not be questioned: https://t.co/zDl7ZXvIQu

Video Transcript AI Summary
The transcript claims there was no gas chamber in Dachau or other German concentration camps. It alleges that Holocaust revisionists are punished for challenging the "official" Holocaust narrative, citing examples like Robert Farison, Jurgen Groff, and Horst Mahler. The speaker states that the Holocaust narrative is used to manipulate white Europeans with guilt, strengthen Jewish identity, promote globalism and multiculturalism, and delegitimize white European identity. They claim critics of Jewish people or Israel are outlawed. The transcript asserts that Jewish and Zionist organizations censor the internet and suppress information that contradicts the accepted Holocaust narrative, alleging that Wikipedia and Google are monitored to fit a "politically correct" narrative. It also claims that "third world invaders" receive lenient sentences for crimes against Europeans, while Holocaust deniers face severe penalties. The speaker concludes that Holocaust denial laws are a gross infringement on freedom of expression and that such laws exist to protect a lie.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Stephen F. Pinter, who served as a lawyer for the United States War Department in the occupation forces in Germany and Austria for six years after the war, made the following statement: I was in DACA for seventeen months after the war as a US department attorney and can state that there was no gas chamber in Dachau, nor was there a gas chamber at any of the other concentration camps in Germany. Speaker 1: I challenge your history again. There is absolutely no record that 6,000,000 people were put in concentration camps. They only have 16,000,000 to begin with. Speaker 2: But in spite of Jewish opposition to historical integrity, Holocaust revisionists are breaking the bars erected around their imprisonment of conscience and speaking out. Robert Farison, for instance, a recognized French specialist in document analysis, has stated that no document has been found that proves that a plan for Jewish extermination by the third Reich was ever contemplated. Expulsion, yes, but extermination, no. As punishment for challenging the official holocaust line, Forrestin has been repeatedly the victim of physical assault, countless legal actions, freezings of his bank account, and heavy fines. In the year February, Swiss scholar Jurgen Groff, author of the book The Holocaust Swindle, after receiving a two year jail sentence for allegedly questioning the existence of gas chambers in Auschwitz, fled to Saint Petersburg where he's been living ever since as an exile. There in Saint Petersburg, Groff is engaged in examining Soviet archives which Groff claims when allowed for release will bring Jewry's official version of the holocaust to its knees. Particularly scandalous and a blow to free speech and historical inquiry is the arrest of German lawyer Horst Mahler. In 02/2009, Mahler was sentenced by two German courts to eleven years in prison total for opinion crimes. One of them being Mueller's assertion that the official version of the Holocaust is the greatest lie ever perpetrated in human history. Speaker 0: The benefits of exegregating the Holocaust have been enormous to sinus Jews both financially and politically. The Holocaust is today used as a guilt weapon as many racial groups exploit the empathy that white Europeans are known to have in order to guilt trip them into a collective guilt by making whites feel shameful and guilty about their past. Speaker 3: Give them the guilt, man. Speaker 4: That's yeah. Absolutely. Speaker 5: We need to Speaker 4: play on that guilt. Speaker 6: You always Speaker 4: I bring up everything from the past. Fifty years. Speaker 3: The Speaker 0: left, communists, or Jews hear a person discussing anything related to immigration, demographics, or race realism, they immediately label that person as a neo Nazi, the next Hitler, or antisemitic. This is done to shut down the conversation and to make the person look like a hateful bigot. Speaker 7: Really quite dangerous, racist, fascist rhetoric. People don't think that it's okay to be a fucking Nazi anymore. It's basically the same as quoting Hitler. Speaker 3: There's a bunch of Speaker 8: opportunistic hate mongering fascists trying to garner sympathy with garbage propaganda videos. I directly compared everyone who talked about cultural Marxists to the fascist literal Nazis who invented the term. Speaker 5: Racism is especially sensitive against individuals who are murdered in the millions. Speaker 9: Very racist and antisemitic things. This is kind of embarrassing, but this hits somewhat close to home since some of my family aligns with that way of thinking. They don't think that it happened. Just gonna erase all that history. Sounds like my grandpa or any other racist person. Bliten the Jews. This is literally my grandpa. Speaker 5: Of course, she doesn't even believe that the holocaust even fucking happened. Well, mean, he did kill, like, 6,000,000 fucking Jews. I mean, believe it or not, he also killed 6,000,000 fucking Jews. Listen, you fucking cow. Okay? When you kill 6,000,000 Jews, it doesn't matter what you did in the past. Speaker 6: Holocaust. Yeah. Yeah. We're gonna talk to Mercedes Carrera. Speaker 3: The 6,000,000. Six million. Speaker 6: When I was a punk rocker when I was a punk rocker, brother Speaker 3: 6,000,000. You're never sick, but I don't know. It was it was 6,000,000. Speaker 0: The Holocaust narrative is used to strengthen Jewish identity simultaneously as undermining, demonizing, and delegitimizing white European identity. It is used as a manipulative weapon weapon against all white Europeans. I have done my research. Shane. I have done my research. Speaker 3: Shane. Shane. Shane. Shane. Speaker 5: Shane. Speaker 10: Now, you owe me some money. Okay? You owe me reparations. Why is that? Speaker 8: Because every freedom that I have and have taken for granted for my entire life has been made possible by wealth that my ancestors stole. Speaker 0: The Holocaust narrative is primarily used to discourage policies such as nationalism and instead promote globalism and multiculturalism in the Western world. Europeans are constantly reminded of never forget, never again and that the horrors will never be repeated. This is done to brainwash the Europeans to not stand up for their own nation and race. Through this narrative, the Europeans support the politics that protect the rights of minority groups instead of their own people. Any criticism against the Jews or the Jewish State of Israel had practically been outlawed. The Jewish Holocaust turning to a religion in which no deviation from the orthodoxy is acceptable. Even if there have been many holocausts and greater genocides throughout history, the Jewish holocaust is the only one that counts and it is of course the only one of whose orthodoxy is criminalized to even question. In fact, it is the only historical event that is prohibited by law to even question in many countries. The reason why you probably never even have heard about this research that have proven the official story to be false, is because researchers who have dared to explore the many inconsistencies and contradictions of the holocaust story have been subjected to physical attacks including harassment, vandalism, career destruction, drive by shootings, physical assaults and even firebombings of the warehouse that holds their work. Jewish and signist anti free speech organizations are doing everything they can to suppress the truth through censoring the Internet and burning the books that expose their lies. Thanks to the pressure from anti free speech organizations, Facebook, YouTube and other social media are doing their best to repress and silence the truth and we cannot even rely on these platforms to be used in the future. Wikipedia and Google is both monitored to fit the politically correct narrative to mislead the population. Speaker 6: Moet Zetiash in conjunction with My Israel has arranged instruction day for wiki editors. The goal of the day is to teach people how to edit in Wikipedia, which is the number one source of information today in the world. As a way of example, if someone searches the Gaza flotilla, we wanna be there. We wanna be the the guys who influence what is written there, how it's written, and to ensure that it's balanced and Zionist in nature. Speaker 10: I came here to learn more about how we, as Israelis and as Jews, can defend Israel online on the Internet, and particularly in Wikipedia in this case. Wikipedia is a bit of a complex system, it's sometimes hard to figure out the rules. I personally tried to edit things in Wikipedia that were against Israel. Knowledge is important for anyone who wants to be active in defending Israel on the Internet so that we can go and we can see the information and we can say this isn't quite right. It's showing one side of the story, and I can I have the the power and the right to change that? And in general, it's so important for us to be online working to defend our ourselves and to prove to to the world and to ourselves that we are just and we are right. And because right now, if you look online, if you do searches for certain terms related to Israel, you just it's just filled with antisemitism, anti Zionism, and garbage. And there's not enough of us out there working to counteract that and make sure that the other side of the story, our side of the story, and our right side of the story is getting the right coverage and the coverage that it needs, so Speaker 0: In our supposedly free and democratic countries that frequently pride themselves of being tolerant, third world invaders are now raping European women and receive the most lenient sentence. Meanwhile, Holocaust deniers or anti Semites can get many years in prison for merely questioning a historical event. It is clear that our governments are not working for our people anymore. According to Gerhard Menonin, there were 117,344 accusations of thought crimes in the German courts in the year nineteen ninety four-two thousand and four. Around 2,000 people are put on trial every year for holocaust denial, which can give up to five years in prison and a fine. Speaker 3: Most of the people in England, America, Australia have no idea what a tyranny this country is. Speaker 4: Hundreds, we have more than 2,000 process, more than 2,000 trials a year and that over more than ten years. So you can imagine how many people have suffered from it and families have been destroyed and they lost their job and so on and so on. That says the truth. And simply for inquiring, simply for inquiring into the sources for They are not promoting any ideas, they are simply asking questions like you do. Yes, and now what happened in Paris is just for us because all the heads of the nation said press free and meaning freedom is the greatest thing for democracy. And therefore I say I use this freedom. Speaker 0: The Holocaust is a story that the globalists don't allow to even be debated or questioned. Anyone who questions the story immediately is branded as a racist, a Nazi who wants to kill 6,000,000 Jews and a Holocaust denier, hater or anti Semite. This labeling technique is used to discourage discourse in discussions related to Holocaust and World War two. Holocaust revisionism is today considered a taboo matter, with laws and prison sentences applied to Europeans who questions the politically correct Holocaust narrative. This is a gross infringement on Article 19 in the United Nations Declaration of Human Rights. Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression. This right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive, and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers. The mere fact that Holocaust denial laws in Europe exist should raise an eyebrow. Truth does not fear investigation. You certainly do not need to make up laws to protect history unless you are trying to protect a lie. The truth stands on its own legs.

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

A final note: As you can see, Holocaust Revisionism doesn't "deny" the Holocaust It believes many of the events that constitute what we collectively know as "The Holocaust" did take place But it also understands, we need to be able to have an honest discussion about historical events, especially when those events are used to this day to exemplify the evils of White collectivism and to solicit reparations for those evils Holocaust Revisionism merely seeks to have an honest and open discussion about the events of the Holocaust and firmly believes this statement to be true: The truth fears no investigation

Saved - June 21, 2025 at 5:18 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared my perspective on the Holocaust, arguing that it is a fabricated narrative. I pointed out that the Red Cross documented 271,000 deaths in camps, and there were no orders from Hitler for a "final solution." I mentioned that evidence like the absence of Zyklon B residue at Auschwitz and discrepancies in survivor accounts raise questions. I also noted that many deaths were due to starvation and disease, not extermination. I believe the portrayal of the Holocaust is largely influenced by propaganda and that questioning it leads to severe consequences.

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Why the Holocaust is a Lie. -the Red Cross kept detailed records of all the deaths in the concentration camps. (271k) -the allies broke the codes to the SS communications, and never heard anything about a Holocaust -there is no order from Hitler for a “final solution.” -Goebbels wrote in his diary that the end goal was to deport the Jews to Madagascar -American executive expert Fred Leucther scraped the bricks of the Auschwitz gas chamber and found no Zyklon B residue. -Paul Rassinier, a French communist, was in a concentration camp alongside Jews, and wrote about his experience being completely different. -it was physically impossible to gas and cremate 6 million Jews in the time it was reported. -the “death camps” were all found on the Soviet side after the war. How did Hitler know where the iron curtain would be? -using Jewish sources, the worldwide Jewish population numbers did not decrease -Rudolf Hoss who “admitted” to the 6 million extermination death, was tortured at Nuremberg - many Jews and other inmates did die, as you see from some of the allies pictures, but it was a combination of starvation and Typhus, which was rampant at the end of the war. -there is no evidence of mass graves or mountains of Ash that would have existed from a mass killing operation -the highest Inmate number tattooed on a Holocaust survivor is 135,913 -Jewish producers in Hollywood create fictional Holocaust stories year in and year out to keep you in your psychological prison. Even Schindler’s list is mostly fiction based on a book called “Schindlers Ark. -the Germans were fighting and losing a 2 front war. Killing their own labor force in the most complex way imaginable would never have even entered their minds, nor was it possible with fuel, gas etc. -the door leading into the “Auschwitz gas chamber” is a wooden door. Legitimately physically impossible to run an execution gas chamber with one of them. -the “gas chamber lie” was war propaganda created by the British initially in their psychological war department. It is written in their archives. -when a German questions the Holocaust, he goes to prison, when a Jew says he’s a victim of the Holocaust, he gets a reparations check.

Saved - October 21, 2025 at 7:12 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I present a thread asserting the 6 million figure is physically impossible, arguing crematoria limits, fuel shortages, and oven specs make 1.1–6 million burns infeasible; gas chambers were delousing tools, not homicidal rooms; cyanide residues supposedly too low for mass gassing; no solid mass graves or mass-exhumation evidence; demographics and emigration explain losses; no formal extermination orders found; testimonies allegedly inconsistent; Zyklon B used for lice, not murder; wartime labor economics dominated; inquiry repressed.

@First_Won_ - FirstWon

10 Scientific Reasons Why the Holocaust's 6 Million Figure is Physically Impossible – Must-Read Revisionist Breakdown- A thread🧵 ~ by GrokWaffen4 Cremation Capacity and Fuel Impossibilities: Ovens Couldn't Handle the Numbers Without Magical Efficiency Revisionists calculate that the crematoria across all camps (e.g., 52 muffles at Auschwitz) lacked the throughput for ~4–5 million claimed cremations (out of 6 million total deaths, as many were allegedly burned after gassing or shootings). This is grounded in oven specs from Topf & Sons (Nazi suppliers) and modern cremation science. Per-Body Time and Daily Limits: A single muffle takes 1–2 hours to cremate one body (pre-heat to 800–1000°C, burn, cool, ash removal), per Topf patents and tests by Rudolf/Mattogno. At Auschwitz, max 1,248 bodies/day assuming 24/7 operation (optimistic, ignoring downtime). Realistically, with maintenance/fuel shortages, ~200–300/day. Over 3 years: ~200,000–400,000 total—not 1.1 million. For 6 million Holocaust-wide: Impossible without 100x more ovens. Coke Fuel Per Body and Total Demands: 20–35 kg coke/body (emaciated corpses burn slower; fat doesn't self-sustain as claimed). For Auschwitz's 1.1 million: 22–38.5 million kg (11,000–19,250 tons), needing 220–385 train cars. Camp records show only ~2,000–3,000 tons delivered 1942–1944 (~60,000–100,000 bodies max). Wartime shortages (e.g., Reich coal rationing) make diversion impossible without derailing military logistics. No Visible Coke Storage in Aerial Photos: 1944 Allied reconnaissance (RAF/USAAF) shows no massive piles/sheds (coke appears dark; thousands of tons would cover fields). No constant smoke plumes for 4,400/day burns—only sporadic, fitting routine use. Absent Train Loads of Coke: Reichsbahn logs/SS manifests show no dedicated shipments (dozens/week needed); deportee trains visible, but no fuel hauls. Fuel for open pits (200–300 kg wood/body) equally absent—no deforestation evidence. Other Camps (e.g., Treblinka): Alleged 870,000 burned on grates; fuel needs: Millions of kg wood, no supply evidence.

@First_Won_ - FirstWon

Gas Chamber Design Flaws: Structures Unsuitable for Homicidal Use Due to Leaks, Explosions, and Inefficiencies Alleged chambers (e.g., Auschwitz Krema II) were delousing facilities for typhus control, not execution rooms—designs violate chemistry/safety basics. Wooden Doors and Leakage: Blueprints/photos show wooden doors (warping, non-airtight); HCN gas escapes pores/gaps, ineffective for containment. No metal seals; unsuitable for crowds/pressurized gas. Explosion Risks from Uninsulated Fixtures: Zyklon B's HCN is explosive (6–41% concentration); unprotected lights/vents/switches spark via static/metal objects. No explosion-proof wiring; suicidal in crowded rooms. Ventilation and Heating Issues: Zyklon B needs 10–30°C to release gas quickly; chambers too cold/damp. No fans for safe venting (HCN lingers); guards couldn't enter without dying. Proximity to Barracks: Auschwitz chambers near SS quarters/cafeteria (~50 ft); venting HCN would kill guards—insane oversight.

@First_Won_ - FirstWon

Cyanide Residue Forensics: No Prussian Blue or Detectable Traces in Chambers Leuchter/Rudolf tests: Samples from chambers show 0–7 mg/kg cyanide vs. 1,000–13,000 mg/kg in delousing rooms. HCN forms stable Prussian blue on iron-rich walls; absent in chambers = no mass gassings. Stability and Durability: Prussian blue is insoluble and resistant to weathering, rain, or scrubbing; it persists for decades, as seen in delousing buildings with visible blue stains on walls even today. Exposure Differences and Cumulative Effects: Homicidal gassings (allegedly thousands of times with high concentrations) should leave residue levels equal to or exceeding delousing (done less frequently); low traces indicate only occasional fumigation for lice, not repeated murder cycles. Chemical Bonding Mechanics: HCN reacts with iron in mortar/bricks to form ferrocyanides (Prussian blue); moist, alkaline walls in chambers would enhance this, but tests show none—contradicting claims of sweaty, panicked victims increasing humidity. Independent Lab Confirmations: Polish Institute of Forensic Research (1994) found low residues but revisionists argue their methods ignored insoluble compounds; Rudolf's re-analysis shows manipulation to fit narrative. Control Samples: Background cyanide in non-gas buildings is near zero; chamber levels match this, proving no systematic HCN use beyond minor pest control.

@First_Won_ - FirstWon

Mass Grave Forensics: No Evidence of Millions Buried or Exhumed GPR/lidar at Treblinka/Sobibor shows minimal disturbances; no vast pits for 1.7 million (Reinhard camps). Bone fragments trace, not mass scale. Exhumation/burning claims require extra fuel/logistics absent in records/photos. Ground-Penetrating Radar (GPR) Results: Surveys by Richard Krege (2000) at Treblinka found undisturbed soil layers, no pits deeper than 6 meters needed for 870,000 bodies; only small anomalies consistent with pre-war graves or debris. Bone and Ash Volume Calculations: 6 million bodies produce ~12,000 tons of ash/bones (2 kg/person); no massive ash deposits or river pollution (e.g., Bug River at Treblinka allegedly used for dumping, but no sediment evidence). Exhumation Logistics Impossibilities: Alleged digging up/burning of 1.7 million in Reinhard camps requires 1,000+ workers, heavy machinery, and months—yet no aerial photos show activity, no fuel records for bonfires, and no survivor accounts of such scale without contradictions. Archaeological Digs: Limited excavations (e.g., Belzec 1997–1999) found scattered remains for ~10,000–20,000, not 600,000; revisionists claim these are typhus victims from labor camps, not extermination. Soil Disturbance Absence: Satellite/post-war photos show no large-scale earthworks; any "pits" are drainage or bomb craters, not genocide sites—GPR confirms virgin soil in alleged mass grave areas.

@First_Won_ - FirstWon

Demographic and Census Data: Population Losses Explained by Emigration/War, Not Genocide Pre-war: ~15.6M Jews globally; post-war: ~14.5M (Jewish sources). European losses (~1–2M) fit migration/disease/bombings, not 6M extermination. No demographic "gap" requiring mass murder. World Almanac Figures: 1938: 15,748,091 Jews; 1948: 15,753,638—slight increase, contradicting 6M loss; revisionists argue post-war stats used pre-war estimates, masking emigration to USA/Israel/USSR. Country-Specific Breakdowns: Poland's 3M Jews "lost" via border shifts/Soviet annexation (1.5M moved east), not death; Hungary's 450,000 "deported" but many survived/transited to Palestine. Emigration Records: 500,000+ German/Austrian Jews emigrated pre-1939; wartime routes via Turkey/Spain added hundreds of thousands—total ~2–3M relocated, explaining "missing" without murder. Post-War Population Inflation: American Jewish Yearbook (1945–1949) shows ~3.5M European survivors, but revisionists cite undercounting of USSR Jews (hidden during Stalin era) and illegal immigration inflating losses for reparations. Demographic Math: Birth rates/deaths from natural causes/war (bombings, famine) account for 500k–1M; no need for genocide to explain gaps—census inconsistencies due to fluid borders/self-reporting biases.

@First_Won_ - FirstWon

No Documented Extermination Plan or Hitler Order: Euphemisms Misinterpreted Wannsee/Korherr use "evacuation" for resettlement, not killing. No forensic link to gas; Allied code-breaks mention no genocide. Absence of Signed Order: No Hitler directive for extermination found in millions of captured documents; "Final Solution" memos refer to labor/resettlement East, not murder—euphemisms like "special treatment" mean medical care or execution for criminals, not mass gassing. Wannsee Protocol Analysis: Minutes discuss "evacuation" of 11M Jews for road-building/labor; no mention of gas chambers—revisionists argue it's a deportation plan, with "natural diminution" meaning harsh conditions, not deliberate killing. Korherr Report Details: 1943 stats show 2.4M "evacuated" but footnotes clarify resettlement/partition, not death; Himmler's edits removed "special treatment" to avoid misinterpretation. Allied Intelligence Gaps: Ultra intercepts (Enigma breaks) captured SS communications but no genocide orders; British/American reports mention rumors, not facts—proving no centralized plan existed. Document Forgeries Claims: Some "evidence" like Höfle Telegram lacks chain of custody; revisionists cite contextual mismatches (e.g., numbers include non-Jews or transfers).

@First_Won_ - FirstWon

Testimony Inconsistencies and Artifacts: Stories Evolve, Shoes/Hair from Hygiene Survivors claim steam/electrocution/diesel (dropped); artifacts (shoes) from delousing/recycling, not murder proof. Evolving Methods in Testimonies: Early claims (1942–1945) of steam chambers/electrocution pits at Treblinka/Belzec abandoned post-war for gas; diesel engines alleged but produce non-lethal CO levels—revisionists cite contradictions as proof of rumor-based fabrication. Confession Coercion: Höss (Auschwitz commandant) confessed under torture (British admission); details like 2.5M deaths contradict his own logs—many "eyewitnesses" never saw chambers, relying on hearsay. Artifact Misuse: Shoe piles (~7,000 at Majdanek) from clothing disinfection/recycling for war effort, not victims; hair cut for hygiene/textiles (louse prevention), not post-mortem—quantities fit living prisoners, not dead. Numerical Exaggerations: Survivors claim 4M at Auschwitz pre-revision; inconsistencies (e.g., impossible crowd sizes in chambers) violate physics—testimonies motivated by revenge/compensation. Non-Jewish Witnesses: Guards/inmates like Paul Rassinier (socialist survivor) saw no gassings, only disease; Red Cross inspectors reported labor camps, not death factories.

@First_Won_ - FirstWon

Zyklon B Supply and Usage: Quantities Fit Delousing, Not Mass Killing Deliveries (~19 tons to Auschwitz) sufficient for typhus control (high in delousing), not 1.1M gassings (needs far more for lethality). Total Supply Calculations: ~8.5 tons/year average; delousing one barrack uses ~10–20 kg—fits epidemic control for 200,000 inmates, but homicidal use (5–10 kg/chamber cycle) for 1.1M requires 5,500–11,000 tons. Manufacturer Records: Degesch logs show shipments for disinfection only; no "human-grade" variants—Zyklon for pests, not people. Usage Efficiency: HCN lethal at 300 ppm but delousing needs 16,000 ppm longer; chambers lack heating for fast release, making murder slow/inefficient. Distribution Patterns: More Zyklon to non-"death" camps (e.g., Dachau) than Auschwitz proportionately—proves anti-typhus purpose, not targeted genocide. Residue Correlation: High cyanide in clothing fumigators vs. low in "chambers" confirms pest use; excess for killing would leave traces/records absent.

@First_Won_ - FirstWon

Labor Camp Economics: Nazis Needed Workers, Not Corpses Camps built for forced labor (e.g., IG Farben factories); killing millions defies war economy—typhus epidemics explain deaths/Red Cross tally (~271k). Manpower Shortages: 1942–1945 Reich desperate for labor (millions of POWs/Jews used in armaments); memos prioritize "fit" Jews for work, contradicting extermination. Investment in Camps: Billions spent on infrastructure (barracks, railways) for productivity, not death—why build hospitals/clinics if planning to kill? Economic Output: Auschwitz sub-camps produced synthetic rubber/weapons; killing workforce illogical amid Allied bombings requiring replacements. Typhus as Real Killer: Epidemics documented (e.g., 1942 outbreak); crematoria/Zyklon for disease control, explaining Red Cross's low registered deaths. Himmler Orders: Directives to reduce mortality for labor efficiency; "genocide" claims ignore this economic imperative.

@First_Won_ - FirstWon

Suppression of Inquiry: Laws Jailing Skeptics Indicate Weak Evidence Holocaust denial laws (e.g., Germany) prevent forensic re-testing; suggests narrative can't withstand science. Criminalization Details: 17 European countries jail questioners (up to 5 years); revisionists like Zündel/Rudolf extradited/imprisoned for reports—stifles debate. Censored Research: Leuchter/Rudolf works banned; no open forensics allowed at sites (e.g., no new GPR digs permitted). Media/Academic Bias: Journals reject revisionist papers without review; "denial" label smears scientists, protecting flawed narrative. Historical Precedents: Similar to witch hunts; laws admit evidence weakness—if solid, why ban scrutiny? Global Inconsistencies: No laws in USA/Asia where revisionism grows; European suppression tied to guilt/reparations politics. This list covers every major revisionist "proof"—testable via math/chemistry—for why 6 million is scientifically impossible, reframing events as wartime hardship exaggerated for gain.

@First_Won_ - FirstWon

@ahonanco That's how you know it isn't truth, it's propaganda. Truth is its own defense and it does not need governments protecting it with prison sentences.

@First_Won_ - FirstWon

@gekkoadvisors 🙋🏻‍♂️ https://t.co/tw3Q7QRf7a

@First_Won_ - FirstWon

@NkitaCruiseChef I mean one could do that, but I felt like that would most likely get flagged and taken down immediately, whereas this one is a hell of a lot harder to argue against.

Saved - July 13, 2025 at 11:05 PM

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

You mean the allies never found 1 single “death camp” it was only reported on the side of the jewish communist Bolsheviks???? That’s weird. https://t.co/M8wkK0QtYG

Saved - July 14, 2025 at 11:52 PM

@WarsawErik - Erik Warsaw

🌐 WW2 Concentration Camps Truth does not fear investigation Listen to both sides of evidence and you decide Gas Chambers 6 million Swimming pools Soccer teams https://t.co/6eMln1b9Xq

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker questions the claim that six million Jews perished in German concentration camps during World War II. They cite gas chamber doors that allegedly didn't lock, some made of wood with glass windows, arguing they weren't airtight and would have harmed the guards. They mention Fred Lukter's analysis of Auschwitz gas chamber walls, which supposedly found no cyanide residue. The speaker highlights the existence of soccer teams, a theater, sewing rooms, and swimming pools in the camps, questioning why these would exist if extermination was the goal. A 1944 International Red Cross report allegedly found no evidence of extermination installations at Auschwitz. The speaker claims Jewish population records before and after the war show no significant change. They state that autopsies on 270,000 bodies found the cause of death was typhus and starvation, not poison gas. They allege some cremation smokestacks had no soot and one chimney wasn't connected to the building. The speaker concludes that evidence was manipulated for propaganda and that questioning the Holocaust is taboo because the narrative falls apart under scrutiny.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Did six million j really perished in World War two German concentration camps, or is that number just a little bit exaggerated? Let's look at the evidence. And let's start with gas chamber doors that did not lock. Speaker 1: Here we see the door to the Mauthausen gas chamber. It does not lock. It doesn't lock. The latches can be opened from the inside or the outside as I am showing right here. You cannot lock somebody into this room. You cannot lock somebody out. Speaker 0: They couldn't lock them in, and some gas chamber doors were made with wooden doors. Wooden doors to gas chambers? Come on. And look at those gas chamber windows. Cheap thin glass windows on wooden frames to a gas chamber? Really? Come on. No one pushed that out to save their own lives? Look closely at all the gas chambers with wooden walls and glass windows too. It's not airtight. If they poured lots of poison gas inside it, it would also wipe out anyone standing outside, including all the German guards. Also, chemical analysis on all the walls of the gas chambers showed that no poison ever existed in them. Speaker 2: In the nineteen eighties, American expert Fred Lukter, who builds gas chambers for American penal systems, took scrapings from the walls of the Auschwitz gas chamber for chemical analysis. He found no cyanide residue at all. The Auschwitz exhibit is a fake, pure and simple. Speaker 0: Now let's go into the soccer teams, the theater, and the sewing rooms that existed in the camps. All this is real footage during the war, not to mention the swimming pools. Why would they have soccer and swimming pools to people they're about to exterminate? And those swimming pools still exist to this day. Here they are. Speaker 3: Finally, we have the Auschwitz Swimming Pool. Yes. That's right. Swimming pool. A beautiful pool with a diving board and starters blocks for races. To their credit, the Auschwitz camp officials have not tried to remove this distraction. But if you wanna see the pool, you need to know already that it exists because you won't find it on the tour. Speaker 0: The impartial international Red Cross was allowed to inspect the camps during wartime to make sure that all prisoners were being treated well. Here's a report by the November 1944, only months before liberation at Camp Auschwitz. The report states no traces of installations of exterminating civilians, period. Also, old records of the Jewish population, before World War two, about 15,700,000. After World War two, about 15,700,000 again. So where is the 6,000,000 missing number? Real numbers of the 270,000 bodies that were found. All were documented and they did autopsy reports on every single one of them. Conclusion, not a single person died of poison gas. Most common cause of death, typhus and starvation. When the Germans were losing, they ran away and abandoned the camps, had them locked without any food. It's sad. Many people passed away, but it was not six million. And of the 270,000, half of them weren't even jays. They said they hid the bodies by cremating them, but some of the cremation smokestacks didn't even have any soot in them. How was that even possible? And one chimney is not even connected to the building. A lot of these things on display were created and built after World War two, manipulated evidence for propaganda and creating a false sense of sympathy. There is a reason why it is illegal to question the h cost or make it extremely taboo. Because as soon as you start scratching the surface and asking questions, the whole thing falls apart way too easily. Truth does not fear investigation. So go ahead and listen to evidence on both sides, and you make your own decision.
Saved - August 12, 2025 at 5:03 AM

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

“Final Solution” document from Hitler to exterminate all the Jews?…. doesn’t exist. Documents of SS discussions on how to reduce the death rate in the camps…. Readily available. 🤔 https://t.co/w7I6c1t3dz

Saved - August 24, 2025 at 11:11 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe the official narrative surrounding the Holocaust is fundamentally flawed, lacking credible evidence and scientific support. Historical claims, such as the repeated figure of 6 million Jewish deaths, seem inconsistent and symbolic rather than factual. Many testimonies from the Nuremberg trials were coerced under duress, and inspections revealed no evidence of gas chambers. Documentation and statistics suggest that deaths were primarily due to disease and starvation, not execution. Moreover, translations of key speeches may have been misinterpreted, further complicating the narrative.

@Miserei_ - Miserei

There is a 0 % probability that the official narrative on the holocaust is remotely close to being accurate. It fails in math, forensics, science and the documentation is either fake or missing. Long thread 🧵

@Miserei_ - Miserei

The term 6 million Jews is repeated in over 200 articles leading up to WW2. One article even claims that 6 million Jews had already been murdered 7 months prior to WW2. https://www.torahtothetribes.com/teaching/the-hebraic-book-of-revelation-part-2c/

The Hebraic Book of Revelation - Part 2C - Torah to the Tribes 6,000,000 has its origins in an ancient Babylonian sorcerers prophecy straight out of the pages of Torah. Lev 25:10 And ye shall hallow the fiftieth year, and proclaim liberty throughout all the land unto all the inhabitants thereof: it shall be a jubilee unto you; and ye shall return every man unto his possession, and ye shall return every man unto his family. תשבו ‘Ye shall return’ = ‘TaShuVU’ - תשבו Tav-Shin-Vet-Vav and it seems to be spelled incorrectly…it’s missing another ו Vav and should be spelt תשובו Tav-Shin-Vav-Vet-Vav תשובו 6,000,000 is the mystical and magical conjure number associated with ushering in the Balaam oracles of return to the land of Israel. The magic: the letter ו Vav is missing;ו Vav = 6. conjure up the vanishing ו Vav and the spell will be set. The return will only happen upon the manufacture of the missing ו Vav. The missing ו Vav is what enables the return to happen torahtothetribes.com

@Miserei_ - Miserei

Up until 1989, the number of deaths at Auschwitz was over 4 million. Then it was reduced to 1.1 million. Majdanek also reduced its death count by nearly 2 million. Somehow the 6 million number did not change which shows that it is symbolic and not at all accurate.

@Miserei_ - Miserei

Although the executions by gas chambers were mentioned in the Nuremberg trials among other outlandish claims, the general public weren’t made aware of its use for executions until the late 1960s.

@Miserei_ - Miserei

Before the late 1960s, we were told that Jews were turned into lampshades and soap which ended up being complete nonsense.

@Miserei_ - Miserei

The NS officers that testified at the Nuremberg trials were tortured into confessions. This makes their testimonies meaningless as people will say anything under torture.

@Miserei_ - Miserei

After judge Edward Van Roden allowed his words to be printed in a press article, he then had to backtrack after receiving too much pressure. He later claimed that some German captives had been kicked in the testicles but that he did not know how many.

@Miserei_ - Miserei

After conducting an inspection, the western military police found no evidence of homicidal gas chambers.

@Miserei_ - Miserei

The Soviets had orders to fabricate German atrocities in order to stir up hatred. They also refused to allow inspectors into the alleged death camps.

@Miserei_ - Miserei

After forensic tests failed to prove that hydrogen cyanide gas was ever used in the homicidal gas chambers, we were then told that the gas chambers were reconstructions done after the war by the same Soviets who had orders to fabricate German atrocities.

@pfmerino - Peter Herrera-Merino

@RegeremBoss Take a look at this video I edited together. This is the David Irving I choose to remember

Video Transcript AI Summary
“Say, it is also totally wrong to call that gas chamber a fake. It's a reconstruction.” “If mister Irving doesn't know the difference between a reconstruction and a fake, then he shouldn't call himself a historian.” “That is what I would call a fake.” “And if they haven't had the honesty to write in big letters above the door, what you are seeing is just a reconstruction on the basis of eyewitness testimony, then that is a fake.” “And I find $22,000 for pointing this fact out because it's an embarrassment.” “The embarrassment is, of course, why do they show the school children the fake building here when allegedly there were genuine gas chamber ruling just down the road three or four miles away?” “The psychological warfare executive were behind the entire gas chamber story.” “We've had a good run for our money with this gas chamber lie, but really we've got to be careful because eventually it's going to be exposed and then our entire psychological warfare effort will be brought down with it.” “And here we are in 1988, and that hare is still running.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Say, it is also totally wrong to call Speaker 1: that gas chamber a fake. It's a reconstruction. If mister Irving doesn't know the difference between a reconstruction and a fake, then he shouldn't call himself a historian. So said this reader's letter in the New Zealand Herald three days ago. To which my to which my response is, if this mister Rubin was to offer me a reconstructed a reconstruction of a $20 bill, I don't think I'd accept that. That is what I would call a fake. If for fifty years, the authorities in Auschwitz have been showing a building busloads of shuddering school children from all over Europe, telling them that is the gas chamber where the Nazis killed millions of Jews, Speaker 0: and if they haven't had Speaker 1: the honesty to write in big letters above the door, what you are seeing is just a reconstruction on the basis of eyewitness testimony, then that is a fake. They have concealed the fact that it's a reconstruction which makes it a fake. And I find $22,000 for pointing this fact out because it's an embarrassment. Of course, it's an embarrassment. The embarrassment is, of course, why do they show the school children the fake building here when allegedly there were genuine gas chamber ruling just down the road three or four miles away? Well, that's because people start asking questions. They say this is odd. Ruins of a gas chamber, but I think what even maps I've seen this was the crematorium, not a gas chamber at all. Poor crematorium in Auschwitz because they had immense typhus problem. They had epidemics with tens of thousands of the inmates dying, which is a crime. And anybody who says to me, David Irving says it wasn't a crime what happened to the Jews in Auschwitz or elsewhere, is also doing men injustice because there was undoubtedly a crime. But we're arguing about scale. We're arguing about intent. We're arguing about the high or how and the why and the wherefore. And this is what we are not allowed to That our own psychological warfare executive were behind the entire gas chamber story. And once again, we're quoting from the archives. They're in the British archives, how the psychological warfare executive decides quite cold bloodedly and cynically to start putting out over the radio waves the allegation that the Germans have built special gas chambers for gassing the Jews and getting rid rid of them. And later on in the files, round about 1944, you find the chairman of the Joint Intelligence Committee, who is responsible for the psychological warfare executive, writing a handwritten minute. His name is Victor Cavendish Bentink, an eminent banker, an industrialist, still alive in England now in Lord Portland as he is now, chairman of the joint intelligence committee, writing and handwriting in 1944, words to the following effect. We've had a good run for our money with this gas chamber lie, but really we've got to be a bit careful because eventually it's going to be exposed and then our entire psychological warfare effort will be brought down with it. So isn't it a bit isn't it a good time now to distance ourselves from this particular story? We've set the hare running. Now we ought to let it go off by itself. A good run for their money in 1944. And here we are in 1988, and that hare is still running Speaker 0: 40

@Miserei_ - Miserei

Actual quotes.

@Miserei_ - Miserei

The propaganda went as far as producing doctored photos to make the Germans look as evil as possible.

@Miserei_ - Miserei

The narrative keeps changing as new evidence emerges. They used to say that 1944 was the height of the genocide in Auschwitz. Aerial photographs proved this to be false. No piles of coke for the crematories, no smoking chimneys, and no line ups of people.

@Miserei_ - Miserei

There are no scientific proofs of homicidal gas chambers ever existing.

@Miserei_ - Miserei

The official narrative stands and falls on the eye witness testimonies of around 20 people. Some of whom often times directly contradict one another.

@Miserei_ - Miserei

You can’t have a crematorium adjacent to a non hermetically sealed gas chamber. You wouldn’t be able to run the place for more than 20 minutes before it exploded, let alone running it 24/7 for 3 years straight. https://www.unz.com/pub/jhr__the-leuchter-report-vindicated/

@LetsGoBrando45 - Brandon Taylor Moore

The Leuchter report, authored by American execution technician Fred A. Leuchter, may provide an in-depth understanding on why it is illegal to question the holocaust in 17 European countries today.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 explains that before going he told “mister Zundle and his defense team” that if he found facilities that could have supported executions, he would testify whether or not they could have sustained gas executions. He says photographs were produced and “the video photographer” documented that “the forensic samples … were properly taken, packaged for submission to the laboratories.” He states he examined the facilities and “made a determination that they were incapable of supporting the use of hydrogen cyanide gas for purposes of execution or otherwise.” He adds that “the reasons that I determined that these facilities were not or never could have been gas execution facilities are stated in my report.” He argues that “None of these ever existed” and that if used, “they would have been blown to bits.” He concludes with “there are no eyewitnesses because there were no gassings.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I told mister Zundle and his defense team prior to my going that if I did, in fact, find facilities that could have supported executions, not only whether they did did support the executions, but only whether or not they could have sustained gas executions. I would make that very clear in my report, and that is what I would testify to when I testified in court. With the exception of the video photographer, I brought the same things that I would have normally brought to a prison in The United States if I was doing a survey of their equipment. The draftsman was there to take and verify verify measurements. Measurements. The drawings were made on-site and then reproduced when we returned to The United States to document everything we saw. I personally made photographs and produced a great deal of photographic evidence of the hardware and facilities that we found in Poland. And the video photographer, which was not a normal thing for me, was brought to document the fact that the forensic samples that I removed from the facilities, the control sample from the Lausing facility Number 1 of Birkenau, and all of the other samples from the alleged gas execution rooms were properly taken, packaged, for and packaged for submission to the laboratories. I examined the facilities, and I made a determination that they were incapable of supporting the use of hydrogen cyanide gas for purposes of execution or otherwise. But additionally, it would be necessary to move remove samples, return them to The United States for testing at an independent laboratory to in fact confirm what my visual inspection indicated, that these facilities never in fact contained hydrogen cyanide gas. What aside from the samples convinced you that these facilities could not have been used then or now as execution facilities? The samples in my mind were mainly corroborative. The reasons that I determined that these facilities were not or never could have been gas execution facilities are stated in my report. And it does it mainly is concerned with the design and fabrication of these facilities. The requirements necessary in the design of a facility that contains a highly explosive and highly poisonous gas. You must have gasketed doors, no windows, means of getting the gas in, means of getting the gas out, something for heating the gas and the air to constantly keep the right temperature, explosion proof switches, lighting facilities, etc. None of these ever existed. We're talking about brick and mortar buildings without heat, with non explosion proof lighting, without gasketed doors, in some cases without doors at all, and with crematories that opened very close or adjacent to the facility. If these facilities were used for gas execution facilities, if those persons operating the facilities didn't gas themselves to death at the same time that the executees died, they certainly would have been blown to bits when the gas exploded from a spark arc in a switch, the heat of a light bulb, or the gas approaching and getting into the crematory furnace. I mean, it's just ludicrous to consider that these facilities could have been used as gas chambers. Speaker 1: Well, we all know from reading the newspapers and watching TV that there's many holocaust survivors who say that they actually saw gassings. They describe them in minute detail, which relative it was they lost, down to the color of the corpses and the color of the smoke coming out of the chimney. How do you respond to these people? Well, one of Speaker 0: the things that was necessary for me to do, Kirk, at the outset so I'd have an understanding of what I was doing was read the literature and alleged eyewitness reports so I could make a determination of the protocol, which that's a fancy word that we use in terms of executions for determining for what the actual procedure is for the execution. And I found through these investigations that there was no such a thing as an eyewitness. I have never seen a report that was written by anyone who had a valid description of what could have happened at a gassing. So the long and the short of it is there are no eyewitnesses because there were no gassings.

@Miserei_ - Miserei

The doors of the gas chambers in Auschwitz aren’t even realistic. If millions of people were killed with hydrogen cyanide, there should’ve been countless eye witness testimonies claiming to have seen cadavers with red skin, and yet there is little to none of those claims.

@Miserei_ - Miserei

Multiple ground penetrating radar tests failed to show evidence of mass graves in Treblinka, but new experts were brought in and claimed to have found evidence of mass graves. Shortly after the ground on site was paved with boulders and concrete so no further tests could be made.

@Miserei_ - Miserei

The vast majority of deaths in concentration camps were from Typhus and starvation near the end of the war when the Allies destroyed the supply lines. In comparison, a small fraction of these deaths were from shooting and hanging.

@Miserei_ - Miserei

The Red Cross and the Soviet documents show that total death count of all concentration camps to be between 200 000 and 300 000.

@Miserei_ - Miserei

There are no documents in the German and British archives that talks about killing people with gas. https://odysee.com/@Zefrenchman:3/e5eae64447f995cb.mp4-(480p):d

David Irving View on Odysee: David Irving odysee.com

@Miserei_ - Miserei

There’s been many attempts to fake NS documents but the archivists used to spot them quickly. Here we have a classic example of a fake document where the style of writing and the ink is different than usual NS documents. The numbers on the file are mathematically impossible. https://t.co/yjMzYAa3pE

@Miserei_ - Miserei

This is a genuine document demanding that everything be done to reduce the death rates in concentration camps. https://t.co/ubdiWRClRe

@Miserei_ - Miserei

The Jewish population had not decreased in the official statistics during the late 1940s. https://t.co/SZFCEl4mfF

@Miserei_ - Miserei

When the Red Cross inspected German concentration camps it was reported that the prisoners were receiving 3 meals a day and were living in descent conditions overall. https://t.co/PK5Xm72caT

@Miserei_ - Miserei

Testimonies of people admitting there were no gas chambers. https://t.co/AEPwaaulX1 https://t.co/9kwXqW1hUC

@NoahsArk1000 - Noah’s Ark 🚢

Rare🚨 ‘Reality of Gas Chambers’ “We all had to sit in a row and what happened eventually is that they rained soap & water—Because we were so full of lice” Listen to one of the ‘survivors’ Must watch & share https://t.co/jdRRbxjp2y

Video Transcript AI Summary
We were all put into what looked like a big bathroom, with shower things at the top. We were put onto benches. We were all stark naked, old and young. The sexes were separated, but we sat in a row. Eventually they rained from the showerheads. They rained soap and water on us. The reason was that we had to be the last. We were so full of lies through that when we hair was cut, and they rained soap and water on us. I do not remember if there were towels. So when I hear about the showerheads and the holocaust and all of that, I know exactly what it was. That was soap and water raining down on us to be lousy. That's what it was. And where the story came from that those were dangerous showerheads, I don't know. That must have come out of the Russian
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We were all put into what used to what looked like a great big bathroom, I guess, because they had these shower things at the at the top. And we were put onto onto benches. We were all stark naked, old and young. Of course, the the sexes were separated, but we all had to sit in a row. And what happened eventually is is that they rained from the showerheads. They rained soap and water on us. And the reason for that was that we had to be the last. We were so full of lies through the through that when we our hair was cut, and they rained soap and water on us. And I do not remember if there were any towels. So when I hear about the showerheads and the holocaust and all of that, I know exactly what it was. That was soap and water raining down on us to be lousy. That's what it was. And where the story came from that those were dangerous showerheads, I don't know. That must have come out of the Russian

@Miserei_ - Miserei

The speeches and texts are often times mistranslated. Here we have a speech from Himmler calling for the extermination of Jews. But in reality, he is calling for the uprooting of Jews. The word Ausrottung has various meanings depending on the phrase that comes first. https://t.co/zlbwgFXAuL

@Miserei_ - Miserei

Ausrottung can be translated into, eradication, extermination, stamping out or uprooting. When looking at the phrase (the evacuation of the Jews), the correct translation should be uprooting instead of exterminating.

@Miserei_ - Miserei

Let’s say the genocide by gas chambers is true. The math simply doesn’t work. Up until 1943, there was one crematorium with 6 muffles operating in Auschwitz from 1941 to 1943.

@Miserei_ - Miserei

Then 4 crematorium with 46 muffles were added from 1943 to 1944 before the camp was turned into an air raid shelter. It takes an average 2 to 4 hours to cremate a body. That’s roughly 8 bodies cremated per muffle every 24 hours.

@Miserei_ - Miserei

The cremation capacity in the first 2 years would be around 17 000 bodies and in the short year of 1943 to 1944. 150 000 bodies could have been cremated if crematorium operated 24/7. This gives us roughly 170 000 in total. Far from the 1.1 million in the official narrative.

Saved - October 8, 2025 at 11:26 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I explore the topic of Holocaust Revisionism, questioning commonly accepted narratives and highlighting claims made by revisionists. I present perspectives from individuals like David Cole and David Irving, who raise doubts about the evidence for gas chambers and the methods of obtaining confessions. I discuss inconsistencies in survivor stories and the portrayal of camp life, which included amenities like theaters and sports. Ultimately, I argue for the importance of open dialogue about historical events, asserting that the truth can withstand scrutiny.

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

🧵People claim October 7th was worse than the Holocaust So just how bad was the Holocaust? Let's find out from the perspective of the Holocaust Revisionists (aka Holocaust "Deniers") These are all facts they didn't teach you about the Holocaust in grade school...

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

First, here’s a jewish man named David Cole on the inconsistencies of the gas chambers (ie. wooden doors and other illogical constructions) David is surprised “how little evidence there is" for many of the events https://t.co/VCoEXDOd2L

Video Transcript AI Summary
Proofs of the Holocaust are few: 'Literally, all there is are the eyewitness testimonies and postwar confessions. There's no picture, plan, or wartime document dealing with homicidal gas chambers or a plan to exterminate the Jews.' After intercepting transmissions from Auschwitz, the speaker argues that the evidence has normal explanations: hair, shoes, and clothing reflect lice control and issued uniforms; Zyklon B was used to disinfect clothes and buildings; the typhus epidemic demanded strict lice control. Allied aerial photos of Auschwitz 'do not show people being gassed or bodies being burned.' He describes a building with four holes in the ceiling; revisionists say they were added later. 1988 Fred Lucher tests showed gas-chamber samples with 'almost no appreciable traces,' Krakow 1990 tests 'got back the same results.' The conclusion: 'there are no eyewitnesses because there were no gassings.'
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I know from years of my own research and the research of others that proofs of the holocaust are few. Literally, all there is are the eyewitness testimonies and postwar confessions. There's no picture, plan, or wartime document dealing with homicidal gas chambers or a plan to exterminate the Jews. And we can't use the excuse that the Nazis destroyed all the evidence because after we had broken the German code, we were able to intercept their secret transmissions, including those that came from Auschwitz. The key to understanding the Holocaust story is understanding the true nature of the things passed off as proofs. Everything that is used as evidence of the Holocaust also can be said to have a perfectly normal explanation. For example, these exhibits are said to be the material proofs of exterminations. There's the piles of human hair. But what does that prove? It's acknowledged that each inmate had his or her head shaved because of the lice problem. That's not denied. So why wouldn't there be piles of human hair? What about the piles of shoes and clothing? Is that a proof? It's a fact that the prisoners were issued a uniform upon arrival, including shoes. So why wouldn't there be piles of inmates' shoes and clothing? It doesn't prove anybody was killed. What about the canisters of gas? No one denies that Zyklon B was used to disinfect clothes and also buildings. Buildings. Zyklon B was one of the premier pest control agents in Europe at that time. It was present in most of the concentration camps, including those that are not said to have had homicidal gas chambers in them. The typhus epidemic that spread throughout Europe during the war and also spread through the camps called for stringent lice control procedures. So what other proofs are offered? Well, there's the usual pictures of sick inmates, which proves the groundbreaking thesis that people got sick in the camp. Once again, I'll add that nobody denies the typhus epidemic, which resulted in many deaths. Then there's the artwork and the pictures of children. But at this point, it's looking pretty bad for somebody looking for objective proofs of the gas chamber. And some of the proofs they present actually work against the concept. For example, they have one of several aerial photographs taken of Auschwitz by the Allies during the war. They don't mention, however, that when blown up, these photos don't show people being gassed or bodies being burned even though they were taken during the time killings were said to be going on almost nonstop. Once inside, we can see why revisionists have had such a field day with this building. Obvious marks on the walls and floors where apparently walls had been knocked down, equally obvious holes in the floor where bathroom facilities had been. We maintain that unlike the large hollow chamber we now see. This room had once been five rooms, including a bathroom. Yet the building does have what appears to be evidence of criminal usage, four holes in the ceiling, which lead to the roof where four little chimneys stand. It is said that through these four holes, cyclone B crystals were dropped. And indeed, there seems to be no other explanation for them. Do these holes prove homicidal gassings? Revisionists have claimed in the past that these holes were added after the camp's liberation and that the inside walls were knocked down and the bathroom facilities removed to make the room look like a big gas chamber. Let's start again talking about this building here. Speaker 1: Notorium gas chamber. Speaker 0: But this is a reconstruction. Speaker 1: It is in original state. Speaker 0: Original? Speaker 1: Original state. It is in original part. Original. It is original. Original in through this chimney was from cyclone beam. Speaker 0: Are those the original holes in Speaker 1: the ceiling? Speaker 0: They've been rebuilt? Yes. Okay. After the war? After the war. Yes. This is Auschwitz Birkenau in an allied aerial photo from September 1944. The train that would come up carrying the doomed inmates, you would have thousands of inmates being marched off the trains into one of these two gas chambers in full view of the entire camp. This was a spectacle that nobody at the camp could miss. They would see thousands of people marching into those buildings and nobody coming out. These were gas chambers that were not isolated from anyone. And indeed, when these aerial photographs were released in the late seventies, they contradicted many supposed eyewitness claims about how the Nazis had tried to camouflage the gas chambers at Birkenau. Another question that should be asked, is there any Zyklon b residue in the gas chamber knowing that cyanide gas would, in fact, leave a residue? In 1988, execution equipment expert Fred Lucher conducted forensic examinations on the gas chambers at Auschwitz to answer that question. He took samples from the four gas chambers at Birkenau, the one at the main camp, and the control sample from one of the disinfestation chambers that we know did use Zyklon B. Now the gas chamber samples showed almost no appreciable traces, whereas the disinfestation sample literally went right off the scale. In 1990, the Institute of Forensic Research in Krakow decided to conduct their own forensic tests to see if they could refute Fred Lucher's findings, and their own tests got back the same results. Speaker 2: With the exception of the video photographer, I brought the same things that I would have normally brought to a prison in The United States if I was doing a survey of their equipment. The draftsman was there to take and verify measurements. The drawings were made on-site and then reproduced when we returned to The United States to document everything we saw. I personally made photographs and produced a great deal of photographic evidence of the hardware and facilities that we found in Poland. And the video photographer, which was not a normal thing for me, was brought to document the fact that the forensic samples that I removed from the facilities, the control sample from the Lausing facility Number 1 of Birkenau, and all of the other samples from the alleged gas execution rooms were properly taken, packaged for and packaged for submission to the laboratories. I examined the facilities, and I made a determination that they were incapable of supporting the use of hydrogen cyanide gas for purposes of execution or otherwise. But additionally, it would be necessary to move remove samples, return them to The United States for testing at an independent laboratory to, in fact, confirm what my visual inspection indicated, that these facilities never, in fact, contained hydrogen cyanide gas. Speaker 3: What aside from the samples convinced you that these facilities could not have been used then or now as execution facilities? Speaker 2: The samples in my mind were mainly corroborative. The reasons that I determined that these facilities were not or never could have been gas execution facilities are stated in my report. And it does it mainly is concerned with the design fabrication of these facilities, the requirements necessary in the design of a facility that contains a highly explosive and highly poisonous gas. You must have gasketed doors, no windows, means of getting the gas in, means of getting the gas out, something for heating the gas and the air to constantly keep the right temperature, explosion proof switches, lighting facilities, etc. None of these ever existed. We are talking about brick and mortar buildings without heat, with non explosion proof lighting, without gasketed doors, in some cases without doors at all, and with crematories that opened very close or adjacent to the facility. If these facilities were used for gas execution facilities, if those persons operating the facilities didn't gas themselves to death at the same time that the executees died, they certainly would have been blown to bits when the gas exploded from a spark arc in a switch, the heat of a light bulb, or the gas approaching and getting into the crematory furnace. I mean, it's just ludicrous to consider that these facilities could have been used as gas chambers. Speaker 3: Well, we all know from reading the newspapers and watching TV that there's many holocaust survivors who say that they actually saw gassings. They describe them in minute detail, which relative it was they lost, down to the color of the corpses and the color of the smoke coming out of the chimney. How do you respond to these people? Well, one of the things Speaker 2: that was necessary for me to do, Kirk, at the outset, so I'd have an understanding of what I was doing was read the literature and alleged eyewitness reports so I could make a determination of the protocol, which that's a fancy word that we use in terms of executions for determining, for what the actual procedure is for the execution. And I found through these investigations that there was no such a thing as an eyewitness. I have never seen a report that was written by anyone who had a valid description of what could have happened at a gassing. So the long and the short of it is there are no eyewitnesses because there were no gassings.

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

Next, let's take a look at how German confessions were obtained through torture, the infamous human lampshade and soap claims, and one of the more interesting Holocaust facts: No document has ever been found showing Hitler ordered any systematic mass exterminations

Video Transcript AI Summary
Cyclone b dropped into the death chamber from a small opening. It took from three to fifteen minutes. We knew when the people were dead because their screaming stopped. After the bodies were removed, our special commandos took off the rings and extracted the gold from the teeth of the corpses. Children of tender years were invariably exterminated since by reason of their youth, they were unable to work. It was the British who obtained by torture the confession of Rudolf Herr's commandant of Auschwitz before turning him over to the Soviets and Poles. This has been confirmed in a book published in 1983 titled Legions of Death, which contains the recollections of British Sergeant Bernard Clark, who brags about having tortured Hearst get a confession out of him and of threatening his family. I would rather die painless than have the sovereign subjected to such humiliation.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Cyclone b dropped into the death chamber from a small opening. It took from three to fifteen minutes. We knew when the people were dead because their screaming stopped. After the bodies were removed, our special commandos took off the rings and extracted the gold from the teeth of the corpses. Children of tender years were invariably exterminated since by reason of their youth, they were unable to work. Is that all true and correct, witness? Yes. Speaker 1: It was the British who obtained by torture the confession of Rudolf Herr's commandant of Auschwitz before turning him over to the Soviets and Poles. This has been confirmed in a book published in 1983 titled Legions of Death, which contains the recollections of British Sergeant Bernard Clark, who brags about having tortured Hearst get a confession out of him and of threatening his family. It was here that Hearst was hanged. Speaker 0: I rather wish the Fuhrer had stood by his followers and taken the responsibility for his command. Think of his position. Oh, sure. His position is chief war criminal. Right? He was our sovereign. It would be intolerable for me to have him standing before a foreign court. You men knew the furor. He would be the first one to stand up and say, I gave the orders, and I shall take full responsibility. And I would rather die painless than have the sovereign subjected to such humiliation.

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

Now, let’s take a look at the evidence against the gas chambers and mass graves as well as some of the numeric anomalies of the Holocaust The first clip is Fred Leuchter who wrote an infamous report called The Leuchter Report that comprehensively examined Auschwitz https://t.co/DUcjnX6cts

Video Transcript AI Summary
- None of the facilities examined at Auschwitz, Birkenau, or Lublin could have supported or in fact did ever support multiple executions utilizing hydrogen cyanide, carbon monoxide, or any other allegedly or factually lethal gas. - Based upon very generous maximum usage rates for all the alleged gas chambers totaling some 1,693 persons per week and assuming these facilities could support gas executions, it would have required sixty eight years to execute the alleged number of 6,000,000 presses. - Promoting these facilities as being capable of affecting mass, multiple, or even singular executions is both ludicrous and insulting to every individual on this planet. - Hydrocyonic Acid was not used in the buildings alleged to have been homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz. - I have come to the conclusion that no one was willfully or purposefully killed with cyclone B in this manner. I consider it impossible.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: None of the facilities examined at Auschwitz, Birkenau, or Lublin could have supported or in fact did ever support multiple executions utilizing hydrogen cyanide, carbon monoxide, or any other allegedly or factually lethal gas. Based upon very generous maximum usage rates for all the alleged gas chambers totaling some 1,693 persons per week and assuming these facilities could support gas executions, it would have required sixty eight years to execute the alleged number of 6,000,000 presses. Promoting these facilities as being capable of affecting mass, multiple, or even singular executions is both ludicrous and insulting to every individual on this planet. Speaker 1: Germa Rudolf is a chemist who knew '1 while working towards a doctorate in chemistry at the renowned Max Planck Institute for Solid State Physics in Stuttgart, began a scientific investigation of the credibility of the Leuchter Report. His detailed chemical analysis concluded that Hydrocyonic Acid was not used in the buildings alleged to have been homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz. His report strengthens the findings of Fred Leuchter. The prominent Austrian engineer, Walter Liftel, also made a report concluding that the homicidal gassings were impossible for technical reasons and because they are incompatible with observable laws on nature. Liftel's report is further authoritative confirmation of the findings of Fred Loister. The American research chemist Doctor. William B. Lindsay also made careful examinations of the alleged gas chambers. After thirty three years of experience as a chemist, he declared and affirmed under oath, I have come to the conclusion that no one was willfully or purposefully killed with cyclone B in this manner. I consider it impossible. The Krakow Forensic Institute, Robert Farison, Fredrik Turban, Jan Ball, Carlo Matano, Jurgen Graf, Anne Sundal, David Macaldon, and many others who also have carried out similar technical inspections of the alleged gas chambers have come to the same conclusion. A brave Jewish revisionist named David Cole made a groundbreaking documentary called Cole in Auschwitz in 1992. Today, are many future length documentaries, analyses and commentary on the German labor camps. In 1999, Ricker Creek, a qualified electronics engineer, and his team of researchers carried out a high-tech exam of the soil in the alleged death camp Treblinka. Using ground penetrating radar for three weeks, the team found that the ground was never even disturbed, and core samples revealed no ash. The results obtained show with 100% certainty that mass graves never even existed in Triplinka or Belzec. There are, in fact, many mass graves in the East. However, this was where the Soviets massacred people. Today, it is well known that, for example, the Katy massacre was committed by the Soviets, but was blamed on the Germans after the war. Doctor Charles Larsen, one of Americans leading pathologists as part of a US war crimes investigation team, performed more than 1,000 autopsies of the dead bodies in the German camps, and none showed any evidence of death by poison gas. If there had been gassings with carbon monoxide or cyanide, the indications would have been extremely dramatic and readily visible. The courses would have been bright sherry red. No Prussian blue cyanide staining was found on walls in the alleged death chambers. Only in the delousing chambers are ample amounts of evidence of gassings, where cyclone B was used on clothes and bedding to stop the spread of typhus. The Auschwitz Museum curator admitted that the Soviets created the homicidal gas chamber after the war by altering a German bomb shelter. In the bomb shelter presented to us as a homicidal gas chamber in Auschwitz, the communists removed the walls and made the infamous cyclone b holes in the roof to make it look like a real gas chamber. Speaker 2: Yeah. Now when you go into that Cream of One building, you're gonna see it. It just looks kinda weird. It has all these dirt mounds all around it. You know, really, it looks like a a bomb shelter, and that's exactly what it was at the end of the war. It was a bomb shelter. They want you to think that 4,000,000 people went through Wash Woods, and they made it look like all the people went through that camp there. But that building there was not capable or made for gassing people, alright, at all. I mean, you know, you go inside it, they they they chop holes in the roof at the end, and it's just ridiculous. I mean, there's no way people were were killed in that building. So they want you to believe that this is the building that people were gassed in. It just wasn't feasible that people were gassed in that building. Speaker 3: The thing now, that building, where they end the tour, that was never a gas chamber. There was a chimney next to it and there were four holes in the ceiling where the Zyklon B granules would be dumped and people would see the holes and they could explore them and look around. What I did in 'ninety two, I interviewed the man who was the director, the curator, for lack of a better word, of of the camp. And he admitted to me on camera, not a hidden camera shoot. It was a open two camera shoot in his office. It was me and my camera woman. And he admitted on camera that the building displayed as the gas chamber is not in its original state, that when the Soviets liberated the camp, that building was an air raid shelter, a very obvious, very clear air raid shelter. And then the Soviets remodeled it to look like what their conception of the gas chamber is. Now there's no backup evidence to prove that this building was ever a gas chamber. There's no Zyklon blue cyanide staining on the walls. There were no four holes in the roof to dump in the Zyklon B. The Soviets added those. There there had been dividing walls. Inside the room, the Soviets knocked those down to make it look like one big open chamber. They ripped up the bathroom facilities. You can still see the drains in the floor. You can still see the holes where the toilet and the sink had led into, but they took out all the facilities and they carved a doorway where there had not been a door to make it look like there was a progression from the gas chamber to the oven room. But there was a lot of stuff that they didn't bother to cover up. There's a gigantic manhole right in the middle of the gas Speaker 2: chamber. Yeah. Speaker 3: A manhole that any adult, even a fairly heavy set adult can go down into. Now what that is, that was an escape hatch, was fairly standard design procedure that underground or partially underground bomb shelters would have an escape hatch in case rubble or anything else prevented the people inside from exiting the bomb shelter through the main door. So you have this manhole that no one had noticed for at that point, Auschwitz, when I went there in '91, Auschwitz had been open to the the West for over a decade. No one ever noticed the damn manhole, and it's right there clear as day. The door to the chamber opens in. In other words, if you if it was a gas chamber and you stuck people in there and they they would all pile up against the door trying to bang their way out, they would die there. In order to open the door again, you'd have to push against a mound of 50, a hundred, two hundred, 300 bodies. The, the door locks on the inside, not the outside. In other words, the the victims would be able to lock the Germans out, which which is just kind of a a silly thing to think of. Speaker 1: In January 1995, the prestigious French weekly magazine, Le Express, acknowledged that everything about this gas chamber is false and that it is in fact a deceitful postwar reconstruction. French Jewish Olga Vorum Sarnikot wrote a book about the National Socialist concentration camps in which she stated Auschwitz, which was to remain the model camp and simultaneously the administrative center, had no gas chamber. A fake chimney was also built by the Soviets in 1947. It has no opening, and it is not even connected to the building. German prisoners were Speaker 0: also

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

Next, David Irving discusses if there were sufficient amounts of combustibles for cremations, the Germans making no references to gas chambers in private or public documents, and the fact the gas chambers on the Auschwitz tour are “reconstructions” and not originals https://t.co/OLfFMIhZxm

Video Transcript AI Summary
He argues that calling the Auschwitz gas chamber a fake is wrong; "It is a reconstruction." If mister Irving doesn't know the difference between a reconstruction and a fake, then he shouldn't call himself a historian. "'A fake, like the bomb scare that's just been telephoned to this hotel,'" he says. He notes that for fifty years Auschwitz authorities have been showing a building to schoolchildren "telling them that is the gas chamber where the Nazis killed millions of Jews" and that, unless they label it, "what you are seeing is just a reconstruction on the basis of eyewitness testimony, then that is a fake." He questions cremation capacity: "how do you cremate 1,000,000 people in Auschwitz?" and cites "40 to 60 kilograms of coke" per person, totaling "40 to 60,000 tons of coke" unseen in photos. He argues archives were not destroyed; "no reference in the intercepted telegrams to anybody being gassed." The Auschwitz record
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: By academics around the world. He then goes on in his readers letter to say, it is also totally wrong to call that gas chamber a fake. It's a reconstruction. If mister Irving doesn't know the difference between a reconstruction and a fake, then he shouldn't call himself a historian. So said this reader's letter in the New Zealand Herald three days ago. To which my to which my response is to which my response is, a fake, like the bomb scare that's just been telephoned to this hotel. That is a fake. If this mister Rubin was to offer me a reconstructed, a reconstruction of a $20 bill, I don't think I'd accept that. That is what I would call a fake. If for fifty years, the authorities in Auschwitz have been showing a building to busloads of shuddering school children from all over Europe, telling them that is the gas chamber where the Nazis killed millions of Jews. And if they haven't had the honesty to write in big letters above the door, what you are seeing is just a reconstruction on the basis of eyewitness testimony, then that is a fake. They have concealed the fact that it's a reconstruction which makes it a fake. And I'm fined $22,000 for pointing this fact out because it's an embarrassment. Of course, it's an embarrassment. The embarrassment is, of course, why do they show the schoolchildren the fake building here when allegedly there were genuine gas chamber ruins just down the road three or four miles away? Well, that's because people start asking questions. They say this is odd, ruins of a gas chamber, but I think according to maps I've seen this was the crematorium, not a gas chamber at all. Four crematorium in Auschwitz because they had immense typhus problems. They had epidemics with tens of thousands of the inmates dying, which is a crime. And anybody who says to me, David Irving says it wasn't a crime, what happened to the Jews in Auschwitz or elsewhere, is also doing me an injustice because there was undoubtedly a crime. But we're arguing about scale. We're arguing about intent. We're arguing about the how how and the why and the wherefore. And this is what we are not allowed to do. This is what questions like, how do you cremate 1,000,000 people in Auschwitz? If cremating one person takes 40 to 60 kilograms of coke, that means that to cremate 1,000,000 people is gonna take 40 to 60,000 tons of coke. And where are those 40 or 60,000 tons of coke? They are not visible on any of the aerial photographs, nor are there truckloads of coke being driven up, nor are there railway lines bringing in the wagon loads of coke. So that is, pre opacity by itself, improbable. And anyway, these four crematory, we know exactly what their handling capacity was, how many cadavers could be cremated at a time. We know they couldn't have cremated more than tops seventy, eighty, 90,000 people in the four or five years that the camp was in existence. These are the technical questions that people ask. And not only that, you have the problem that people say, no doubt the Nazis destroyed all the records. At the end of World War two, everything was destroyed, of course. That's what the Nazis were like. They covered their tracks. Well, ladies and gentlemen, I'm obnoxious historian who's worked for fifty years in the archives, and those archives have still not been properly researched. They're still in total disarray. And believe me, it would not have been possible in the last one or two weeks of the collapsing Third Reich for somebody to go around all the archives taking out all the references to gas chambers if they were in it, or all the references to the final solution if there were any, and destroying. They couldn't defend it. And even if they could have destroyed all the German records relating to the final solution and all the German records which contained the fatal word gas chamber, so that there aren't any left in the archives now in Germany, they couldn't. The Nazis have destroyed what is in the British files. Because you see, we British were reading the German files. We were reading the German secret messages. When the commandant of Auschwitz Concentration Camp sent a message to Berlin reporting what he was doing, giving the actual daily statistics of how many prisoners were arriving, how many were leaving, how many were in the camp at midnight, how many had died. We have those code messages in Britain. Those actual code messages from the commandant of Auschwitz, we know what he reported. And the chief historian of the British Secret Service who printed this in volume two of the official British history of the Secret Service as an appendix. He states, it's quite evident that huge numbers of people died in Auschwitz Concentration Camp from typhus epidemics, from illness and disease. A small number died from execution being executed by hanging or shooting. And then he goes on to say, there is no reference in the intercepted telegrams to anybody being gassed. No reference at all. Hundreds and hundreds of code telegrams and the top secret SS code, and there's no reference to anybody being gassed in Auschwitz. These are the kind of documents which mean something to me as a historian. And that is why when people say, but what about all the eyewitness evidence? I say eyewitness evidence baloney. Tell that to John Demianuk about eyewitness evidence, the man, the Cleveland auto worker, who was nearly hanged in Israel on the basis of eyewitness evidence until the Jewish judges in Israel, this Israeli Supreme Court said this evidence was not good enough. They themselves had to acquit John Denyano, admitting that eyewitness evidence alone was not good enough, and that the eyewitnesses had erred and that they had identified the wrong man. Eyewitness evidence is not good enough if there is a total lack of collateral evidence in the archives. And here we have to say there is no such evidence. The Auschwitz record

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

With so many Holocaust survivors telling stories of the camps some claims have turned out to be inconsistent From the lady who claimed to have been raised by wolves to fluctuating death tolls Here's just a few of the inconsistencies of certain Holocaust claims: https://t.co/dEp0QULNCn

Video Transcript AI Summary
Two sources for Holocaust stories are claimed: coerced Nazi officials and Jewish survivors. The transcript enumerates sensational testimonies including gassings, torture, and bizarre acts—describing a “Tango of Death” and other gruesome scenes. It highlights Herman Rosenblatt’s apple-story, a widely publicized tale later shown to be false; he insists, “It wasn’t a lie… it was my imagination.” Other fabrications are cited: Mitig Grocer’s Sweden talks plagiarized from Mila 18; Josef Hurt fabricating Auschwitz escape; Misha DeFunsheca’s memoir found fabricated; Elie Wiesel accused by Miklos Gruner of being an impostor; Gruner disputes Wiesel’s tattoo claim and his Auschwitz identity. The text also references scientists disputing gas chambers, Auschwitz’s physical conditions, and critics arguing the Holocaust narrative is exaggerated or false, including Gerrard Menounin and Norman Fiegelsang.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The actual Holocaust stories comes from two sources: the captured high officials of the National Socialist Party that were coerced and tortured during the Nuremberg trials and the actual Jewish survivors that came out of those concentration camps. These Jewish testaments ranged from gassings, Jew eating bears and eagles in cages, vaporizing 20,000 Jews near Auschwitz with atomic energy, torturing and killing Jewish prisoners to the tempo of a specially composed Tango of Death. Steaming Jews to death like lobsters at Treblinka, electrocuting them to death, musical camp dogs ripping Jews who played false in the orchestras to death, homosexuals being tickled to death, gazers of Jewish blood, Jews being made into lampshades and soap, carts on rails that threw Jews into the ovens directly, Nazi masturbation machines and yeah, additional testaments that were given are just as ludicrous. Speaker 1: The one thing Speaker 2: that I'll never forget that I heard, and he said, the Nazis are taking our our young Jewish infants, and they're tearing them in half by their legs, and they're throwing them in the nester. The nester is a river. So they said, for every person that's gonna take their lives, they're gonna torture to death five of us. Then they punished us. For every man that ran to the wire. They they took a 100 inmates, and they killed them in front of everybody. The greatest love story we've ever told on Speaker 0: this show. Oh my goodness. Speaker 3: Herman Rosenblatt received international attention for his story about being a hungry little boy in a Nazi concentration camp who was thrown apples every day by a little girl on the other side of the fence. Years later, according to the story, Rosenblatt met that same girl on a blind date in New York City, and he proposed on the spot. Speaker 2: I used to come by every day, bring the apple, have in my jacket and a piece of bread, and he used to say, I'll see you tomorrow. Speaker 3: The story landed Herman and Roma Rosenblatt on Oprah twice and in newspapers all over the world. They also got a book and movie deal, but the story wasn't true. Why did you do it? Why did you tell such a big lie to so many people for so long? Speaker 4: It wasn't a lie. It was I it was my imagination. And in my imagination, in my mind, I believed it. Even now, I believe it. That she was there, and she threw the apple to me. Speaker 3: How how can you say it wasn't a lie? It it wasn't true, and and you know it's not true. Speaker 4: Yes. It's not true. But in my imagination, it was true. Speaker 3: Members of his own family say his real motivation was money. Herman and Roma Rosenblatt told their false story publicly for more than a decade, but it all fell apart about six weeks ago after Holocaust scholars proved that it was physically impossible for prisoners to approach the fence at the concentration camp where Herman was kept and that Roma's family was actually more than 200 miles away at the time. Rosenblatt is remarkably unrepentant about his years of lying. Speaker 4: I pronounce my love for you forever. Speaker 3: When you look at that, does it make you uncomfortable at all? No. You think that was the right thing to do? Speaker 4: Yeah. Speaker 3: And and and while you were up on the stage there with all these people, in the back of your mind, you not thinking I'm not telling the truth here. No. So if you had to do it over again, would you tell the same story? Yeah. You would? Yes. Speaker 2: I simply don't know what to say. I mean, it's his imagination, but he knows it's not true. Speaker 3: He said he made up he made up a fantasy world, and he was living in that fantasy world. Speaker 2: And his son says, tried to stop him? Yes. Good heavens. Okay. Thank you, Dan. Pleasure. Speaker 0: Mitig Grocer towards Sweden talking to children, telling them of the horrors of the German concentration camps. It turned out that his story was directly plagiarized from a fictional book called Mila 18 from 1961. Josef Hurt from Pennsylvania gave public speeches for years where he claimed to have escaped from Auschwitz and even met evil Nazi doctor, Josef Mengele. He had now confessed that he had fabricated the entire story. He admitted that everything was a lie. Hurt had even tattooed a fake prison number on his arm to make people believe in his lies. Otto Utkinant had for years been paid shekels to lecture in German schools about his experiences of the Holocaust. He has talked about the Crystal Knight, how he lost 72 relatives including mother, father and sister and how he himself was interned at Buchenwald. However, Otto now admits that the whole story was a lie. Misha DeFunsheca wrote a best selling memoir about her experience of the Holocaust. Her story was published almost twenty years ago as Misha, a Memoir of the Holocaust Years. The book describes how when she was six, her Jewish parents were taken from their home by the Nazis and how she set off across Belgium and Germany and Poland to find them on foot, leaving out stolen scraps of food until she was adopted by a pack of wolves. She also claimed to have shot a Nazi soldier in self defense. The story became a huge bestseller and was even made into a film in France. But in 2008 it was found to be fabricated and everything was a lie. The author whose real name was found to be Monica de Valle said that it is not the true reality but it's my reality. There are times when I find it difficult to differentiate between reality and my inner world. Misha will now have to pay back the money she was awarded, which amounts to $22,500,000 Elie Wiesel has told us for fifty years that while at Auschwitz he was tattooed on his left arm the number A7713. He also adds that his father was given the number A7712, but a real Auschwitz survivor, Miklos Gruner claims that Elie Wiesel is an impostor. Miklos who actually was at the camp claims that Elie Wiesel stole the identity of a real man named Lazar Wiesel who the number eighty seven thousand seven hundred thirteen actually belonged to. First of all, if you look at his arms, Elie Wiesel does not have a tattoo. The number 8700712 actually were given to a man named Abraham Wiesel, Lazar's older brother. Eli Wiesel never claimed that he saw any homicidal gas chambers, instead he claims that he witnessed evil Germans throwing Jewish babies in gigantic flames sleeping up from a ditch. But this has also been debunked by scientists, historians and engineers. Auschwitz was built on a swamp with a high water table which made it impossible for bodies to have been burned in ditches. Not to mention that it was impossible for human bodies to be totally consumed by flames in this manner because of lack of oxygen. Miklos however says that he never saw any ditches where children were burning. Eli Wiesel explains that some events do take place but are not true. Others are, although they never occurred. In 1986, Miklos Gruner met Eli Wiesel in Stockholm. Miklos thought that he was going to meet Lazar Wiesel. But after the meeting Miklos said, I was stunned to see a man I did not recognize at all. He was not my fellow prisoner. Miklus also was surprised that Eli couldn't speak Hungarian, but spoke English with a strong French accent, even though Huizel claims that he was born in Hungary. Neither Elie Wiesel nor his father, Shlomo Wiesel, are named in any records from Auschwitz or Buchenwald. After the war, Elie Wiesel joined the Jewish terrorist group Irgun. Anyway, Elie Wiesel is today laughing all the way to the bank as his best selling book Night brought him international recognition at millions of dollars. He even won the Nobel Peace Prize in 1986. Out of thousands of real Jewish survivors from the German camps, the international Jewish community handpicked Zionist and hate filled liars to spread anti German propaganda. But of course, not all Jews are lying. Many Jews don't agree with the Holocaust narrative, and many of them testified that they never saw any mass murders or gassings. But these Jews have effectively been silenced by anti free speech, signist organizations to cover up the truth. Paul Rasinier was arrested by the Gestapo in October 1943 and deported to Germany, where he was held prisoner until the end of the war in Buchenwald and Dora Concentration Camps. Rasinier was upset by the many lies and myths about the concentration camps that were being circulated. French resistance members who also were interned in various German concentration camps during the war including Auschwitz and other alleged death camps, they all gave accounts of their treatment by the Germans and they all denied any knowledge of gas chambers and a mass murder program in the camps. Rysigner said that never at any moment did the responsible authorities of the Third Reich intend to order or in fact order the extermination of the Jews in this or any other manner. Maria van Herwarden testified about her camp experience in a Toronto District Court in March 1988. She testified that she witnessed the deaths of many fellow inmates by deceased and particularly typhus, and she saw some take their own lives, but she saw no evidence at all of mass killings, gassings or of any extermination program. The Jew Benedict Kochsky, who spent the years from 1938 to 1945 in concentration camps, three of these in Auschwitz, said: I was in the big concentration camps in Germany. I must truthfully state that in no camp have I ever seen anything that might have resembled gas chambers. A Jewish woman named Marika Frank arrived at Auschwitz Birkenau from Hungary in July 1944, when 25,000 Jews were supposedly gassed and cremated daily according to the official story. She testified after the war that she heard and saw nothing of gas chambers during the time she was interned there. Jewish writer Gerrard Menounin says, the Holocaust is the biggest lie in history. Germany has no blame for the second world war. That Jewish pressure has inflicted laws on democratic societies to prevent questions and incessant promotion and indoctrination of the same advertently inconsistable Holocaust proves it must be a lie. Why else would no one be allowed to question it? Jewish professor Norman Fiegelsang says, the Holocaust proved to be the perfect weapon for deflecting criticism of Israel. The Holocaust may yet turn out to be the greatest robbery in the history of mankind. Jewish chief rabbi Aria Friedman says, the Holocaust is a successful historical fiction. Jewish professor Roger de Margo said Speaker 1: I know that the problem, for instance, of the Holocaust is a complete fake because it's very easy to know because it's it's a simple technical arithmetic problem which could be solved by a child in high school. Any chemist know that you can't gas people with cyanide acid. Let's call it that in English. Hydrocynic Hydrocynic acid. 1,000 or 2,000 people at the time, it's well known, and, even the most important American Jewish newspapers, like the American Jewish Yearbook, said that there was 3,003,000 Jews in occupied Europe in 1942. So I don't see how they could have killed 6,000,000 Jews when there was only three millions. You know, they So I think anybody can see that. I I listed in 1944. I see. I listed for three years, 1944. It was in the world. The world finished in 1945. But I was in the army 1944 because, of course, as everybody did, I believe that Hitler was the real monster that everybody said he was. But since I have studied what happened in Nazism, under Nazism, what Hitler did want to do and say when you read these books, what maybe anybody can read Mein Kampfel can read myth of the twentieth century by Rosenberg. And anybody can know also what happened these last fifty years when declared I absolutely had nothing to do and not the slightest influence because Nazi has been there now for fifty years. So you can do what happened. And what happens, I told you in my my lecture, it's absolutely incredible. And at the top of everything, you can see the Jews. I told you, I studied the books which really expresses Nazism, that is to say, Meigumpf and the myth of the twentieth century by Rosenberg. As to what's happened during the war, and especially what Hitler actually did, which is hidden, which is concealed to us. What what he did in Germany. And the only know thing we know about Hitler is that he killed 6,000,000 Jews who never existed in gas chambers, which nobody ever saw. That's all that's the only thing which people know about Hitler. But when you really know that this what he did, what he actually did in Germany, well, when you have studied all that, you see that you have been completely completely misled to use a Speaker 0: mild

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

Next, what was life was like inside the camps? Well, surprisingly, the camps had theaters, swimming pools, soccer leagues, orchestras, and even plays But don’t take my word for it, let the Holocaust survivors tell you themselves: https://t.co/eJD14ivPJ4

Video Transcript AI Summary
Culture persisted at Auschwitz: a grand piano in Block 1, a downstairs theatre, and curtain rings sewn. I helped arrange music for each instrument from the director’s score on scarce paper. The camp library and newspapers, a violin quartet, and a camp movie in barracks offered entertainment; later, Germans allowed cinema and letters by postcard. Stamps and money from Vienna’s Jewish community, plus coupons redeemable in a cantina, funded small purchases, mostly cigarettes. On weekends we formed soccer teams; by 1944 in Rosen, organized matches continued as food waned. Weddings and maternity wards existed; over three thousand live births were registered in Auschwitz, with not a single infant death, and a nursery operated. Freddie Hirsch had me paint walls for the children; Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs inspired a playful mural and a hush-hush performance watched by SS.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We also had an orchestra where some of the musicians stood together and one musician was so good that he had the instruments playing and he wrote the notes. So later on we had a band who played over the weekend. And, that was, of course, helping us. You know, we also did plays and stuff. Speaker 1: Were there any cultural activities happening in Auschwitz? Yes. I told you we had a piano put into a not just a piano, a grand piano was brought into Block 1. Once that was built, that new block, the downstairs room was assigned for theatre. When he wanted to build a stage curtain in that new Block 1, which was one big dining room was going to be also with the stage, so performances could be done for women there, culture. He said, for heaven's sake, isn't there anybody here who can help me sew on these curtain rings for the stage. I do it for you, he says. And I came forward and I helped him with the curtain stage. And that was wonderful because I had a man sitting across me for a change. And my room mate is in charge of work assignments. And if you happen to know music, what instruments do you play? I said, I learned piano, but not good enough for an orchestra. I can tell you that right now. He said, well then maybe you know the notes. I said, yes. He said, well then I can use you because we have to write it from the original music piece what the director gets to the instruments. And so for each instrument has only short line on the whole paper. So I had to take it apart and write for each instrument. From that what I had to do. I had to even make the lines. We didn't have paper that was pre printed for notes, nothing. So I spent the whole day there for a while until we were taken away from Auschwitz. But then she saw me work there, I had a big table where I could work and lay out all the paper and it was very peaceful and relaxing. And wanted to talk more to me. That is when I met that SS man at one time. That was the last job I did while I was in Auschwitz. And when I the other job that when I was in Block 10, we went out to pick the leaves. And from these leaves, they would make tea for the whole camp, for the whole Auschwitz. Speaker 2: How did you entertain yourselves? Speaker 3: Well, there were at that at at the beginning of those days, there was a library where you people could get books to read. There were newspapers that we could get. And that and also among ourselves sometimes we had a violin quartet used to come and play in barracks. And they even later on, they said they're gonna build a movie in the camp. And the prisoners said said, only you must be crazy. They're make a movie for us in in in the camp. And then it happened. They made a movie in the camp. Yeah. And we we went in barracks after barrack. We we could go to see a movie sometimes in the evening. They brought movies in to the in the evening. And Speaker 2: What kind of movies would they show? Speaker 3: German movies. Once I came to the main camp, they were allowed twice a month to ride home. Once a postcard and once a letter. Speaker 2: They gave you the materials? Speaker 3: Yeah. They gave us the letter, the materials, and we could Speaker 2: How did Speaker 1: you get the stamps? Speaker 3: Stamps. We could buy stamps. Speaker 2: Could You had money? Speaker 3: Yeah. We got my we still got my with the money we got through the Jewish community from Vienna who sent us. Everybody, you some money. Speaker 2: And and in the camp you could have currency? Speaker 3: Yeah. They could have money because there was in camp also what they call a cantina and not many times, but once in a while they sold a few cigarettes or they sold something, whatever they had. So if you had money, you could buy in that cantina there. Food, there wasn't really any food really. They usually sold and sometimes they sold they sold some weak beer that sold also in the in the yeah. But not really anything else, not much. Mostly cigarettes. Speaker 2: And when you went to the movies, did you have to pay? Speaker 3: Yes. We had to pay. After the the money stopped, the regular money stopped, we got paid in coupons then. Speaker 2: Paid for your work? Speaker 3: Well, I don't know if it was for whatever. We got paid for in coupons for which were redeemable in the in that canteen if they had something. So that was their their way of distributing money then to everybody, everybody got this money then. Speaker 0: Of course what we did is for the weekends we got together, we got a group of us together and we made a soccer team which was about a little later where we Speaker 4: played soccer. It's amazing that there would be a soccer team, that there'd be Speaker 3: enough energy left to do something like that. Speaker 0: Well, I don't think we were quite as energetic as we were with the other regular team, but we did something to, you know, it kept our mind off these, of the problems we had. Speaker 5: Especially the Germans started losing the war, 1943, 1944. So 1944 we had soccer games in Rosrose. Soccer teams, we organized very well, soccer teams, each nationality organized a soccer team and we organized our equipment and everything to play soccer in the assembly line and assembly place. In Rosen. In Gross Rosen. So, you know, that much free it was in there, but it was like the 44. Russians already pushed away, Americans already invaded on the other side, so there they have to give more freedom. But that was much more freedom and food didn't improve very much because simple reason, they didn't have it very much themselves. Speaker 6: Did the civilians try to help you at all? Did they trade goods for things? Speaker 5: It's as I say, we have almost everything, what we wanted, whether it's soccer teams, from the civilians, from Markside civilians. But that Speaker 3: was Speaker 5: strictly under the cover. They knew it but they didn't do much about it because they knew the war was almost all of us. They didn't, they even played soccer with us. Just to make the store funny, the toy incident funny that one time the Polish team played against German teams and one of the top enlisted assessment decided he wants to play for the Polish team. So we say okay, you can play for us. And then the commandant, SS commandant, he was like a captain. He decided to want to play for the German team. So, he went in the field. I think they were a little bit tipsy. Speaker 6: How did you feel about that? Speaker 5: And the funny part of it, we said, you just let them play, they play almost by themselves. We just run around them. But that was one of the incidents which stuck so funny in it. But that's happened, it was 1944, it almost things came to close. Speaker 6: So, what you're saying then that the closer the end of the war came, pressure was let up rather than becoming more cool? Speaker 5: In our camp, you did feel the pressure made up. Speaker 7: There were weddings and even maternity wards for pregnant women. Inmates were falling in love and getting married in the camps. Over three thousand live births were registered in Auschwitz alone, with not a single infant death while it was in operation under German rule. The evil Nazis even set up a nursery for the children. Speaker 8: Freddie Hirsch called me to the children's barracks he was heading then, and he asked me if I could paint something on the wall for the children. And I said, well, if you can get the materials, he said, I'll get the materials. I said, okay. And then a very handsome young blonde man from the men's camp came over one day. And Freddie Hirsch called me to come and meet him. And he asked me what I need. So I said, well, if I can get any wall paints, so any tempera paints, I would like those. If you can get me some, and he said, yes. Anything you want. And so before I knew it, Freddie had the stuff ready for me, and I started painting. At first, not knowing what, I looked at that huge drab. It was kind of olive colored like all the barracks were wall. And I thought, well, the thing to do is to make it look like we are in a Swiss chalet on the deck, and there is a balustrade with flowers and flower pots on it. And we are looking out at the beautiful meadows and maybe see some cows and sheep and stuff, and I started painting. And then afterwards, far in the distance, I was putting some sheep and some cows, and then I noticed that all the kids were standing around me, behind me. So I turned around and I asked them if they would do they have any special wish what to put in that meadow? And they said, Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs. And that was a very surprising answer. So I made a painting of Dopey standing on another dwarf's head with a cloak around him so he looked like a tall guy, so he would be as tall as Snow White. And they were dancing together, and the shoes, those soft shoes and everything. And the kids loved it. And I made some other dwarves around, one who was playing the accordion. I think there was Grumpy, the mean one. And the professor with the glasses. I made almost all the dwarfs standing around. Some of them were clapping, and that's what the kids like. I now understand that there was another painter who continued something painting on the walls after I've left. I don't know about that. Speaker 9: When you were in the process of doing that Speaker 8: Yeah. Speaker 9: What did it do not only for for you, but for the for the children Speaker 8: on on an emotional level. Well, it did several things, not just emotional, but the children then wrote a play which was a satire of Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs. So I figured out a way of making a crown out of paper, and the kids were painting it gold and putting, like, jewels on it. And then I took some paper strips and I painted them with a black paint. And I don't know about the costumes, what what they made costumes out of, but the play was very successful because the little girl who was, playing Snow White had an incredible voice, a gorgeous soprano, just like the one that you hear in the movie. Speaker 9: How were they allowed to put on a play in Auschwitz? Speaker 8: I don't know, but it was done kind of quite hush-hush, all of it, except that when it was put on, suddenly some SS men appeared and they watched. And then when Arnold Behm put on that play, he he wanted something like a Wardville Wardville play, which I was into. That was when I couldn't stand the breath of the guy who was playing with me. Speaker 7: The building just left entering Auschwitz was actually a brothel used by the internees of the camp. Hospitals and camp dental facilities attended by camp inmates, dentists and nurses to deal with the inmates dental problems. The Auschwitz Camp had sick bays and hospitals where thousands of inmates were cured. The camp authorities foremost the garrison physician doctor Wirths tried all imaginable ways to keep the Auschwitz inmates alive, strong and healthy. The Holocaust Speaker 0: is

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

Here's David Irving again, this time he discusses Hitler’s apprehension to using nerve gas on Allied soldiers This is fascinating because it shows Hitler had a double standard for using nerve gas in the camps vs on troops... https://t.co/0DQG10MRP3

Video Transcript AI Summary
The Fuhrer has absolutely forbidden the use of poison gas. The enemy is to use it first, and then we will retaliate with ours. the Germans would have won the war because the Germans had not just poison gases like mustard, the Germans had nerve gases. At this time, in 1944, they already had stockpiles of 30,000 tons of nerve gases, sarin and tabun. But he had put his name on a piece of paper, the Geneva Gas Protocol, saying that he would never use gas first because it would be a war crime. the nine or 10 panzer divisions out of Normandy and sent them to the Russian front.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And embargoed anywhere the use of poison gas. It's it's there. The actual document signed by Hitler, the references in the vows of the German high command, the verbatim references by him and the shorthand records of his meetings, the shorthand records of meetings in the German air ministry. The Fuhrer has absolutely forbidden the use of poison gas. The enemy is to use it first, and then we will retaliate with ours. The reason being, the reason that makes this yardstick so extraordinary is that if Churchill had done what he was threatening and dropped the poison gas on German cities, the Germans would have won the war because the Germans had not just poison gases like mustard, the Germans had nerve gases. At this time, in 1944, they already had stockpiles of 30,000 tons of nerve gases, sarin and tabun, the famous nerve is being used even now by the Russians in Afghanistan and in Iraq and in Angola and elsewhere where the Russian troops are fighting. The nerve gases sarin and tabun, Hitler already had stockpiles of 30,000 tons, and nobody found out till the war was over, which is just as well because if Hitler had ever used it in Normandy, fighting the Allied, the American, the French, the British troops in Normandy, the Canadians as well, it would have been the end of the bridgehead because we didn't have a gas mask. We had no gas mask which would have stopped the German nerve gases. It would have been the end of the bridgehead. And isn't it strange that Adolf Hitler, the devil incarnate, had the means whereby he could have secured an immediate strategic advantage, which would have turned the war because he would have pulled the nine or 10 panzer divisions out of Normandy and sent them to the Russian front. And with those high grade divisions, he would have wiped the floor with the Russians and ended the war by Christmas nineteen forty four. But he had put his name on a piece of paper, the Geneva Gas Protocol, saying that he would never use gas first because it would be a war crime.

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

Ok, we're almost done... This next clip discusses the marketing of the Holocaust after WWII, the rising and falling Auschwitz death tolls, and the history of the 6 million number But most importantly: It shows the tactics used against Holocaust "Deniers"

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 urges historical perspective, noting the wartime Soviet alliance and that their anti-Nazi propaganda was accepted by the Allies; as victors, the Soviets "got to commit their propaganda to the history books as fact." He says current knowledge of Stalin's despotism and the KGB's deception, and the camps Majdanek, Belzec, Kelno, Treblinka, and Sobibor, have required relying on Soviet sources. "I believe in the inarguable fact that 6,000,000 Jews were killed in the war by Adolf Hitler and Nazis." He asks Speaker 2 if he believes that figure. Speaker 2 replies, "But I don't think 6,000,000 Jews were gassed. Now be careful. I I beg of you. This is against the law in Germany. If there was a German somebody that's in German state, you could have me thrown into prison before I leave Germany."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I think it's necessary to put this matter in its proper historical perspective. You see, we live in a time now when the old Soviet Union has fallen apart, and it's now okay for both liberals and conservatives as well as everybody else to speak ill of the departed communist state. But it was not always that way. During World War two, the Soviets were more than just a military ally. Their anti Nazi propaganda was readily accepted by the other allies because it served all of their purposes. The point is that as the victors, the Soviets got to commit their propaganda to the history books as fact. With the 2020 hindsight we now have, the knowledge of Stalin's despotism, and the KGB's history of misinformation and deception, as well as the other camps in Poland, Majdanek, Belzec, Kelno, Treblinka, and Sobibor, we've had to rely on the Soviets for most of our information. Speaker 1: I believe in the inarguable fact that 6,000,000 Jews were killed in the war by Adolf Hitler and Nazis. I'm merely asking you, as a president of Iran and as a scholar, do you believe that 6,000,000 Jews were killed by the Nazis, or do you think that is not true? Speaker 2: But I don't think 6,000,000 Jews were gassed. Now be careful. I I beg of you. This is against the law in Germany. If there was a German somebody that's in German state, you could have me thrown into prison before I leave Germany. I hope that's not your intention.

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

And last but not least, let's take look at how the Holocaust narrative is still used to this very day: https://t.co/fwVdCeUaus

Video Transcript AI Summary
"I was in DACA for seventeen months after the war as a US department attorney and can state that there was no gas chamber in Dachau, nor was there a gas chamber at any of the other concentration camps in Germany." "no document has been found that proves that a plan for Jewish extermination by the third Reich was ever contemplated. Expulsion, yes, but extermination, no." "The Holocaust narrative is used to strengthen Jewish identity simultaneously as undermining, demonizing, and delegitimizing white European identity." "The Holocaust narrative is primarily used to discourage policies such as nationalism and instead promote globalism and multiculturalism in the Western world." "Any criticism against the Jews or the Jewish State of Israel had practically been outlawed." "The mere fact that Holocaust denial laws in Europe exist should raise an eyebrow." "Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Stephen F. Pinter, who served as a lawyer for the United States War Department in the occupation forces in Germany and Austria for six years after the war, made the following statement: I was in DACA for seventeen months after the war as a US department attorney and can state that there was no gas chamber in Dachau, nor was there a gas chamber at any of the other concentration camps in Germany. Speaker 1: I challenge your history again. There is absolutely no record that 6,000,000 people were put in concentration camps. They only have 16,000,000 to begin with. Speaker 2: But in spite of Jewish opposition to historical integrity, Holocaust revisionists are breaking the bars erected around their imprisonment of conscience and speaking out. Robert Farison, for instance, a recognized French specialist in document analysis, has stated that no document has been found that proves that a plan for Jewish extermination by the third Reich was ever contemplated. Expulsion, yes, but extermination, no. As punishment for challenging the official holocaust line, Forrestin has been repeatedly the victim of physical assault, countless legal actions, freezings of his bank account, and heavy fines. In the year February, Swiss scholar Jurgen Groff, author of the book The Holocaust Swindle, after receiving a two year jail sentence for allegedly questioning the existence of gas chambers in Auschwitz, fled to Saint Petersburg where he's been living ever since as an exile. There in Saint Petersburg, Groff is engaged in examining Soviet archives which Groff claims when allowed for release will bring Jewry's official version of the holocaust to its knees. Particularly scandalous and a blow to free speech and historical inquiry is the arrest of German lawyer Horst Mahler. In 02/2009, Mahler was sentenced by two German courts to eleven years in prison total for opinion crimes. One of them being Mueller's assertion that the official version of the Holocaust is the greatest lie ever perpetrated in human history. Speaker 0: The benefits of exegregating the Holocaust have been enormous to sinus Jews both financially and politically. The Holocaust is today used as a guilt weapon as many racial groups exploit the empathy that white Europeans are known to have in order to guilt trip them into a collective guilt by making whites feel shameful and guilty about their past. Speaker 3: Give them the guilt, man. Speaker 4: That's yeah. Absolutely. Speaker 5: We need to Speaker 4: play on that guilt. Speaker 6: You always Speaker 4: I bring up everything from the past. Fifty years. Speaker 3: The Speaker 0: left, communists, or Jews hear a person discussing anything related to immigration, demographics, or race realism, they immediately label that person as a neo Nazi, the next Hitler, or antisemitic. This is done to shut down the conversation and to make the person look like a hateful bigot. Speaker 7: Really quite dangerous, racist, fascist rhetoric. People don't think that it's okay to be a fucking Nazi anymore. It's basically the same as quoting Hitler. Speaker 3: There's a bunch of Speaker 8: opportunistic hate mongering fascists trying to garner sympathy with garbage propaganda videos. I directly compared everyone who talked about cultural Marxists to the fascist literal Nazis who invented the term. Speaker 5: Racism is especially sensitive against individuals who are murdered in the millions. Speaker 9: Very racist and antisemitic things. This is kind of embarrassing, but this hits somewhat close to home since some of my family aligns with that way of thinking. They don't think that it happened. Just gonna erase all that history. Sounds like my grandpa or any other racist person. Bliten the Jews. This is literally my grandpa. Speaker 5: Of course, she doesn't even believe that the holocaust even fucking happened. Well, mean, he did kill, like, 6,000,000 fucking Jews. I mean, believe it or not, he also killed 6,000,000 fucking Jews. Listen, you fucking cow. Okay? When you kill 6,000,000 Jews, it doesn't matter what you did in the past. Speaker 6: Holocaust. Yeah. Yeah. We're gonna talk to Mercedes Carrera. Speaker 3: The 6,000,000. 6,000,000. Speaker 6: When I was a punk rocker when I was a punk rocker, brother Speaker 3: 6,000,000. You're never sick, but I don't know. It was it was 6,000,000. Speaker 0: The Holocaust narrative is used to strengthen Jewish identity simultaneously as undermining, demonizing, and delegitimizing white European identity. It is used as a manipulative weapon weapon against all white Europeans. I have done my research. Shane. I have done my research. Speaker 3: Shane. Shane. Shane. Shane. Speaker 5: Shane. Speaker 10: Now, you owe me some money. Okay? You owe me reparations. Why is that? Speaker 8: Because every freedom that I have and have taken for granted for my entire life has been made possible by wealth that my ancestors stole. Speaker 0: The Holocaust narrative is primarily used to discourage policies such as nationalism and instead promote globalism and multiculturalism in the Western world. Europeans are constantly reminded of never forget, never again and that the horrors will never be repeated. This is done to brainwash the Europeans to not stand up for their own nation and race. Through this narrative, the Europeans support the politics that protect the rights of minority groups instead of their own people. Any criticism against the Jews or the Jewish State of Israel had practically been outlawed. The Jewish Holocaust turning to a religion in which no deviation from the orthodoxy is acceptable. Even if there have been many holocausts and greater genocides throughout history, the Jewish holocaust is the only one that counts and it is of course the only one of whose orthodoxy is criminalized to even question. In fact, it is the only historical event that is prohibited by law to even question in many countries. The reason why you probably never even have heard about this research that have proven the official story to be false, is because researchers who have dared to explore the many inconsistencies and contradictions of the holocaust story have been subjected to physical attacks including harassment, vandalism, career destruction, drive by shootings, physical assaults and even firebombings of the warehouse that holds their work. Jewish and signist anti free speech organizations are doing everything they can to suppress the truth through censoring the Internet and burning the books that expose their lies. Thanks to the pressure from anti free speech organizations, Facebook, YouTube and other social media are doing their best to repress and silence the truth and we cannot even rely on these platforms to be used in the future. Wikipedia and Google is both monitored to fit the politically correct narrative to mislead the population. Speaker 6: Moet Zetiash in conjunction with My Israel has arranged instruction day for wiki editors. The goal of the day is to teach people how to edit in Wikipedia, which is the number one source of information today in the world. As a way of example, if someone searches the Gaza flotilla, we wanna be there. We wanna be the the guys who influence what is written there, how it's written, and to ensure that it's balanced and Zionist in nature. Speaker 10: I came here to learn more about how we, as Israelis and as Jews, can defend Israel online on the Internet, and particularly in Wikipedia in this case. Wikipedia is a bit of a complex system, it's sometimes hard to figure out the rules. I personally tried to edit things in Wikipedia that were against Israel. Knowledge is important for anyone who wants to be active in defending Israel on the Internet so that we can go and we can see the information and we can say this isn't quite right. It's showing one side of the story, and I can I have the the power and the right to change that? And in general, it's so important for us to be online working to defend our ourselves and to prove to to the world and to ourselves that we are just and we are right. And because right now, if you look online, if you do searches for certain terms related to Israel, you just it's just filled with antisemitism, anti Zionism, and garbage. And there's not enough of us out there working to counteract that and make sure that the other side of the story, our side of the story, and our right side of the story is getting the right coverage and the coverage that it needs, so Speaker 0: In our supposedly free and democratic countries that frequently pride themselves of being tolerant, third world invaders are now raping European women and receive the most lenient sentence. Meanwhile, Holocaust deniers or anti Semites can get many years in prison for merely questioning a historical event. It is clear that our governments are not working for our people anymore. According to Gerhard Menonin, there were 117,344 accusations of thought crimes in the German courts in the year nineteen ninety four-two thousand and four. Around 2,000 people are put on trial every year for holocaust denial, which can give up to five years in prison and a fine. Speaker 3: Most of the people in England, America, Australia have no idea what a tyranny this country is. Speaker 4: Hundreds, we have more than 2,000 process, more than 2,000 trials a year and that over more than ten years. So you can imagine how many people have suffered from it and families have been destroyed and they lost their job and so on and so on. That says the truth. And simply for inquiring, simply for inquiring into They the sources for are not promoting any ideas, they are simply asking questions like you do. Yes, and now what happened in Paris is just for us because all the heads of the nation said press free and meaning freedom is the greatest thing for democracy. And therefore I say I use this freedom. Speaker 0: The Holocaust is a story that the globalists don't allow to even be debated or questioned. Anyone who questions the story immediately is branded as a racist, a Nazi who wants to kill 6,000,000 Jews and a Holocaust denier, hater or anti Semite. This labeling technique is used to discourage discourse in discussions related to Holocaust and World War two. Holocaust revisionism is today considered a taboo matter, with laws and prison sentences applied to Europeans who questions the politically correct Holocaust narrative. This is a gross infringement on Article 19 in the United Nations Declaration of Human Rights. Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression. This right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive, and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers. The mere fact that Holocaust denial laws in Europe exist should raise an eyebrow. Truth does not fear investigation. You certainly do not need to make up laws to protect history unless you are trying to protect a lie. The truth stands on its own legs.

@Bobby1_x - Bobby Thorne

A final note: As you can see, Holocaust Revisionism doesn't "deny" the Holocaust It believes many of the events that constitute what we collectively know as "The Holocaust" did take place But it also understands that we need to be able to have an honest discussion about historical events, especially when those events are used to this day to exemplify the evils of White collectivism and to solicit reparations for those evils Holocaust Revisionism merely seeks to have an honest and open discussion about the events of the Holocaust and firmly believes this statement to be true: The truth fears no investigation

Saved - December 27, 2025 at 12:54 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A user asserts that Jews receive reparations, exploit gentiles to advance Israel, and that Jewish crime is hidden; they claim Jews spread false Holocaust narratives, deny gas chambers, and label the Holocaust a fabrication used to control history and education. They argue work camps had amenities, accuse Jews of wealth extraction, and claim “final solution” never existed, prompting ongoing denial and conspiracy claims.

@xGHOSTx990 - Alé (Lord/Majesty) ✝️

@badazn Do jews still receive reparations from their fabricated German Holocaust? YES. They steal, plunder, and squeezing dry the gentiles as much as they can. Jews use these plundered resources to advance the state of Israel and impede the rise of nationalism. https://t.co/BcxKdAUbpr

Video Transcript AI Summary
The conversation touches on a sequence of controversial assertions that connect politics, finance, war, and media narratives, followed by a shift to fitness industry transparency. The speakers discuss economics, implying that there was “complete depression to, like, the most booming economy in the world” within a couple of years, and they urge asking why this happened by examining “the things or the changes that took place when he took office and started to and what he implemented,” insisting there is “a reason for why it had such a surplus in growth and a complete one eighty turn into the positive direction.” They then move to a claim about banking and a Rothschild figure, stating that after the banking incident, there was “literally arrest arrested one of the Rothschilds and, like, ransomed him back,” and assert that this is “probably a lot of the reasons why the war really kicked off.” The dialogue continues with a provocative assertion that “war is the most profitable thing of all time,” adding that “the Jews are still profiting off World War two, and that's why they wanna keep the whole Holocaust thing.” This leads to a claim that there would be money continuing to be made off the Holocaust, suggesting that “they're still making money off it,” and that “they use that” as a shield to justify ongoing actions “so it's like, I think it is important to take it on.” The speakers emphasize the importance of truth, even if challenging the Holocaust is controversial, arguing that truth is important and that speaking it out matters because it reveals what is “true.” They contend that in society there is a problem when “we can't talk about the truth,” and they connect this to current events or narratives about accountability and transparency. The discussion then shifts to the speaker’s identity as a fitness influencer who focuses on exposing fraud in the fitness industry, confirming that this is part of their mission and past. The conversation frames the same lens of transparency: just owning flaws or questionable actions and speaking the truth. They argue that some fitness figures “clearly [are] juiced out of their mind” and tell kids they are “natural,” which the speakers view as a problem. They acknowledge that people should be aware that looking like that is not natural, while clarifying that taking steroids does not make someone a bad person; rather, there should be honesty about it. Finally, they begin a closing line noting that “everyone makes” claims or judgments—indicating a broader stance on accountability and openness across both public discourse and personal branding.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Boom, like complete depression to, like, the most booming economy in the world Right. Speaker 1: In a couple years. And then all you have to really do is ask yourself why and then just look at the things or the changes that took place when he took office and started to and what he implemented. And there's a reason for why it had such a surplus in growth and a complete one eighty turn into the positive direction. Speaker 0: After the banking, arrested, literally arrest arrested one of the Rothschilds and, like, ransomed him back. This is this is probably a lot of the reasons why the war really kicked off. Speaker 1: I mean, too, also, if you think about war is the most profitable thing of all time. You know, the Jews are still profiting off World War two, and that's why they wanna keep the whole Holocaust thing. Speaker 0: That's crazy. They're no one Speaker 1: they're still making money off it. Speaker 0: There'd be they use that. People like, oh, you shouldn't take people tell me, oh, you shouldn't challenge the Holocaust, you know, because it's just why it's a bad look. But it is important. One for truth. Two, because they're still getting money and they use it as a shield. They use it as, oh, the Holocaust so we can do this. So it's like, I think it is important to take it on. You're like, oh, it's good. You know, you're gonna get called a Nazi taking that on, but it's like, but it's what's true. Yeah. That's important to me. What's truth is important. Speaker 1: And that's when you have a problem in society. We can't talk about the truth. I think in any regard. Speaker 0: Yeah. Well, you you kinda came on as a fitness influencer. I didn't know a lot about you, but your whole thing is about exposing the truth and fraud in the fitness industry. Correct? Speaker 1: Right. Speaker 0: It was kind of always your past. So you're just doing the Speaker 1: same transparency. Just owning like if you have flaws or you're doing certain things, just owning it and speaking the truth and Speaker 0: the transparency about it. So these guys are clearly juiced out of their mind. They're telling kids, oh, I'm natural. That is a problem. It's like you can't look like that naturally, and people should be aware of that. It's like, it doesn't mean they're bad people for taking the steroids, but a little honesty should be there. Speaker 1: Because I think everyone makes
Video Transcript AI Summary
The transcript describes a shift toward reparations in Europe, spurred in part by United States pressure, which enabled funding for European Jewish culture. In Sweden, despite its wartime neutrality and lack of losses, Social Democrat prime minister Johan Pershing and deputy secretary Jan Eliason felt Sweden bore a burden from its neutrality, including allowing Nazi transit to Norway with devastating effects on Norwegian Jews. This led to the creation of an institute to reignite European Jewish culture: PAIDEA, the European Institute for Jewish Studies in Sweden. The aim was to revitalize European Jewish life, with Annaly traveling across Europe to recruit participants, providing Eurail train tickets to travel and study. Participants arrived from many countries and formed a distinctive group described as the “disc assimilators,” a generation aware of why they are Jewish and literate. In 2014, the Glamsted Declaration arose, describing a group of activists, thinkers, and artists committed to renewing Jewish life and culture in Europe. They state that matters relating to antisemitism and the State of Israel have influenced Jewish interaction with the wider European community. They believe Jewish thought and experience can contribute to a more just and democratic Europe, that Jewish communities can model minority citizenship based on integration without assimilation, and that Jewish thought can contribute to European Jewish values by examining universalizing claims through a multiplicity of voices. The passage ends with a rhetorical question: “Why did this make me cry?”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The whole era of reparations began. Again, much under the the pressure of The United States, nevertheless, European countries began to come to terms with the role that they had played in the Holocaust and reparations beginning. Now why was that so important for the flourishing of European jewelry? Because among other things, it meant that there was some funding that was available that wasn't before. Something unique took place in Sweden. Sweden was neutral during the war. There was no legal, thankfully. There was no loss of life. There was no loss of property. But because of who you see on your left, then Social Democrat prime minister, Johan Pershing, and the secretary his deputy secretary general, Jan Eliason, what he what bothered him was he didn't feel that Sweden was that being neutral was such a virtue. In fact, just the opposite. He felt that Sweden carried a great burden. It did allow after all the Brazilian things. It allowed the transport of Nazi force forces over Sweden territory into Norway with devastating results for the Norwegian Jews. And he began to talk to the then two heads of the community, Gabriel Berwitz, who you also see on your screen, and Leno Bosner Karoszik. And what was determined was that an institute would be formed to mandate that would be mandated to reignite Jewish culture in Europe. Eureka, and Liard, the next step. PAIDEA, the European Institute for Jewish Studies in Sweden, was formed with if you wanna have some sleepless nights, to become the director of an institute, his mandate is to reignite European Jewish culture. Annaly traveled around Europe to try to recruit some participants, some students for this new institute, which was going to reignite European Jewish. We gave them train tickets, euro euro rail tickets, and said, go out. Do this. And they did. But as well, I traveled all around Europe. Oh, actually, I don't know why we lost all of it. Anyway, all of oh, there we go. People showed up from all sorts of countries, but there was something unusual about these people. And who are the who came to the institute? We began to call them the disc assimilators. Not only are these remarkable, this diss diss diss assimilating generation of people who know white why they're Jewish and have become literate. In 2014, I'm only happy you were part of this group, the Glamsted Declaration. We are a group of activists, thinkers, and artists united by a commitment to the renewal of Jewish life and culture in Europe. In recent years, matters relating to antisemitism, the Shewan state Of Israel, come to define Jewish interaction with the larger European community. We strongly believe, in particular, that Jewish thought and experience can make important contributions to the ongoing endeavor for a more just and democratic year. Jewish thought and experience have important insights to contribute to the European Jewish community. Jewish communities can provide a model for minority citizenship based on the principles of integration without assimilation, and this is where the cheers came. Last, not not not least, we believe that Jewish thought can contribute to European Jewish values by providing examples of how universalizing claims are constantly examined with the multiplicity of voices. Why? Why did this make me cry?

@aldamu_jo - Irlandarra

Ben Shapiro: Reparations don’t work. Charlamagne: They worked for Jewish people. (They *still* receive HoIocaust reparations) Shapiro: Erm, uh, that's totally different! Israel took $500b from America (and $30B since Oct 7). It still begs for more. https://t.co/0AV6NH9tqA

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 argues that on a public policy level, reparative policies are not as effective as people want. He cites Holocaust reparations from Germany as an example, noting there was a huge debate in Israel over whether survivors should accept reparations, with the view that accepting payments could be seen as expiating past sins or buying off history. He asserts that reparations are not the reason Israel has become economically successful; rather, success comes from a determined effort to meet the meritocratic standards of success. He then discusses US foreign assistance to Israel, calling it a bargain for the United States because Israel “doesn’t need the money,” and contrasts this with other fiscal considerations. He mentions a claim that the black community would gladly take foreign assistance, though he notes he cannot speak for them. He provides a related financial context: “it’s like $3,000,000,000 a year” in some form of aid, and adds comparative U.S. military expenditure on bases abroad—“we spend $6,000,000,000 a year on our military bases in Japan, $5,000,000,000 a year on our military bases in Germany.” He emphasizes that a substantial amount of U.S. money helps other countries and underlines that Israel does not simply receive money but receives military product produced in the United States. The speaker explains that the relationship includes intelligence sharing and Israel’s development of its own technology, which the U.S. benefits from through disseminating tech they develop. He gives a concrete example: helmets used by F-35 pilots, noting these are Israeli-developed helmets, illustrating technology add-ons that the U.S. can leverage. He insists that the notion of a zero-sum dynamic—money sent out with nothing in return—is inaccurate, because the arrangement yields reciprocal benefits through defense collaboration and technology development.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I think that on a on a sort of public policy level, reparative policies don't tend to be nearly as effective as as people want them to be, historically speaking. What Jewish people? In in what way? Jewish people have received reparations. You mean Holocaust reparations, for example, from Germany? So I think that, first of all, there was a gigantic fight, actually, in Israel over whether Holocaust survivors should accept reparations from Germany, because the idea was that it's allowing them to expiate their sins of the past, they shouldn't be allowed to expiate those sins, it's and allowing them to buy off the history for $50 or whatever it is. But that is not the reason why Israel has become successful economically, like just on a success level. The reality is that cutting people checks rarely makes them more successful from the government. What usually makes people more successful is a is a determined attempt to become the things that the meritocracy demands of you. Right? So there were there were no long, you know, long And do scale think The US foreign assistance for Israel has helped financially? Well, mean, The US foreign assistance for Israel actually is a bargain for The United States because Israel doesn't need the money. I've said this before I mean We'll take it. That's fine. The black community would gladly take it. That's in it. I can't speak for it. It's like $3,000,000,000 a year. We should point out at this point that we spend, I think, $6,000,000,000 a year on our military bases in Japan, 5,000,000,000 a year on our military bases in Germany. We spend an awful lot of money that helps an awful lot of other countries. Israel has to spend all of that money, by way, in The United States on military product. So all of the money that we send to we actually don't send money to Israel, send military product to Israel that is made in The United States, and so it actually is a subsidy to the American defense industry, and there is a deal with Israel where Israel does intelligence sharing and also develops its own tech and can't disseminate it to the world. So for example, the the helmets that our f 35 pilots use, those are Israeli developed helmets, like, that we can see over the horizon, for example. That's because Israel developed technological add ons. So the idea that this is sort of like a zero sum, the money goes out, we get nothing back, that's actually not That's actually not true.

@xGHOSTx990 - Alé (Lord/Majesty) ✝️

@badazn Jewish crime statistics have been historically covered up and continues to this day

@VyprCEO - Khaled 𐌔𐌔oliman

The only ethnic group where crimes don't count, LITERALLY. https://t.co/mKRYj8XagZ

@xGHOSTx990 - Alé (Lord/Majesty) ✝️

@badazn Jewish crimes against the nations and making them collapsed Blood libel Spreading Heresy in god Rejecting god Usury Etc…

@VyprCEO - Khaled 𐌔𐌔oliman

From the U.S. Department of Justice: jews, despite being the lowest in population, commit the most white-collar crimes (e.g. fraud, embezzlement, insider trading, money laundering, bribery, cyber scams, etc). jewish crimes are then entered as “White” crimes in the statistical data. They often escape their crimes and take a one-way flight to israel. But if by any chance they are captured and go to prison, they are placed in a special prison with a fully kosher kitchen and receive special amenities reserved for jews. They eat and live as if it's a 5-star hotel.

@xGHOSTx990 - Alé (Lord/Majesty) ✝️

@badazn Work camps list of amenities

@LetsGoBrando45 - Brandon Taylor Moore

Concentration camp amenities during WW2 1. Orchestras and musical performances 2. Soccer fields and sports facilities 3. Swimming pools 4. Brothels 5. Libraries 6. Art classes and workshops 7. Theaters for plays and films 8. Post offices 9. Canteens for purchasing goods https://t.co/yzoAHr1ssP

@xGHOSTx990 - Alé (Lord/Majesty) ✝️

@badazn How the fabrication of the German holocaust was imbedded into humanity

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

“The “Holocaust” was an organized psychological campaign that began in 1941…. When you go through the old OSS (OG CIA) documents, it’s essentially a guidebook on how to create rumors.” -Cory Hughes List all the easily debunked rumors from the Holocaust. -Brain Bashing Machine -Bone Grinders -Mobile Gas Chambers -Worlds Largest Ovens -Nazi Spanking machine -Bars of Jewish soap

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 1 argues that the conversation about the Holocaust has been framed improperly and that there is an organized psychological warfare campaign that began in 1941 with the first rumors of gassings at the basement of Block 11 in Auschwitz. He claims those stories are infused with OSS propaganda points, noting that the OSS doctrine on rumors is essentially a guidebook on how to create and spread rumors, and that the job of the OSS was to spread rumors. He says they created and that they will get to that next, providing slides to put gas chamber stories in context. He notes that the other allegations will make the gas chambers clearer. Speaker 0 acknowledges technical issues with the live stream. Speaker 1 proceeds with a series of claimed devices and methods, all of which he says were testified to under oath at Nuremberg. - The brain-bashing machine: the prisoner was placed against a wall with an iron plate that was slowly lowered onto his head; the plate contained a ramrod that shot out and delivered a blow to the back of the head, knocking him dead; the iron plate was operated by a foot lever in a corner of the room. - Bone grinders: allegedly a bone grinder could grind bones of 200 persons at a time, producing 200 cubic meters of bone flour; the claim emphasizes explicit concrete detail to enhance believability. - Mobile gas chambers: arose from mobile delousing stations; these mobile gas chambers do not exist; the claim suggests the mobile chambers were created to account for the numbers claimed and to enable driving around and stuffing people into a mobile gas chamber. - World’s largest ovens: testified ovens could fit 2,500 to 3,000 bodies; bones were smashed into small particles by bulldozers and the ashes strewn over the yard so that no traces should be left; the claim is used to counter assertions that the Nazis destroyed all evidence. - Nazi spanking machine: a punishment of 50 blows with a stick on the loins; administered with a swinging apparatus manipulated by an SS; a machine that knocked you in the balls controlled by a lever. - Gloves and pocketbooks of human skin: claimed to exist but said to be long since debunked. - Plucking of the pubic hairs: August 1942 order for prisoners to have all hair removed from armpits and around genitals; prisoners supposedly spent the night plucking hair by hand; guards killed four prisoners and wounded three by rifle fire the next morning; the claim is that no prisoner received a razor, though the Germans supposedly knew they had none. - Torture cabinets: alleged that a group of prisoners were locked up on New Year’s Eve 1945 due to cold conditions; described as a psychological device. - Bars of Jewish soap: rumors first emerged in World War I; this is presented as another example of the types of propaganda. Speaker 1 closes by noting that the aim of including a humorous twist was part of how rumors were crafted, and that the OSS embedded such elements in their propaganda.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Yeah. Just real quick. We're talking about the Holocaust, the Speaker 1: I was saying that the conversation we've had on the Holocaust ever for for all time has been framed improperly. And while, yes, a lot of the things that seem overtly false have been called out on their face, there is something that links all these things together, right? This is an organized psychological warfare campaign that began all the way back in 1941 with the first rumors of the gassings at the basement of Block 11 in Auschwitz, right, which when you dig into those stories they're really quite hilarious because all of the OSS type propaganda points are inserted into these stories. The striking concrete detail, you know, the unique cultural heritage stuff baked into the stories. When you go through the old OSS documents, particularly the doctrine regarding rumors, it's basically a guidebook on how to create and craft a rumor and how to get it to spread and that's what these guys did. The job of the OSS was to spread rumors and that's exactly what they did. They created and that's actually what we're gonna get to next. Speaker 0: I have Speaker 1: a couple slides I want to show you at the just to put in context the gas chamber stories because when you see the other allegations that were made, it's like, oh, I understand the gas chambers now. Right? Speaker 0: Yeah. It gets ridiculous. Yeah. Yeah. And I apologize, people in Rumble. They'll miss the beginning. I'm brand new to doing live stuff, the mess ups, but I think they'll they'll be able to jump in pretty they'll be able to figure out what's going on. Speaker 1: Yeah. So alright. The brain bashing machine. This is the first one we'll talk about. So the prisoner as before was placed against the wall with an iron plate that was then slowly lowered onto his head. The prisoner was under the impression that he was gonna be measured for height, and the iron plate contained a ramrod which shot out and suddenly poleaxed the prisoner with a blow to the back of the head. He then dropped dead. The iron plate was operated by a foot lever in a corner of the room. Right? You ever see you ever hear about this in a history book? Speaker 0: Nope. That that that one didn't go. These are the ones they tried getting. Speaker 1: Right. But you have to remember, every single one of these that I'm gonna read off today was testified to under oath at Nuremberg. Speaker 0: This could be what was taught in our schools if things have gone slightly different. Speaker 1: Yes. Yes. But you'll see, this is nothing more than wartime propaganda. Yeah. Bone grinders. So allegedly, had a bone grinder that could grind bones of 200 persons at a time as has been proved to the commission and as a constant yield of 200 cubic meters of bone flour. You see the the the explicit concrete detail that they put in these things. To make it makes it more believable. Right? The less vague a story, the more believable. Mobile gas chambers, this is also nonsense. This mobile gas chambers arose from the mobile delousing stations that they had, and we'll get into Zyklon B later. But the mobile gas chambers, they don't exist. Part part of the reason they came up with this was because they couldn't account for the numbers that they were claiming, and the mobile gas chambers allowed them to break from the confines of the camps and go drive around and literally stuff people in a mobile gas chamber. Really, it's it's utterly ridiculous. Mhmm. World's largest ovens. Someone testified they had ovens that could fit 2,500 to 3,000 bodies. This is my favorite part and this is something that everyone really needs to grasp. The bones were smashed into small particles by bulldozers and the ashes strewn over the yard so that no traces should be left. So anytime people try to tell you that the Nazis destroyed all the evidence, what they're really saying is that they don't have any evidence. It's the exact same thing. Nazi spanking machine. Speaker 0: Spanking machine. I haven't heard this one. Speaker 1: One of the most usual punishments was 50 blows with a stick on the loins. They were administered with such a machine I saw with a swinging apparatus manipulated by an SS. So a machine that knocked you in the balls controlled by a lever and an SS man. Right? The gloves and pocketbooks of human skin, this is long since been debunked. Again, the idea is that this is such a horrific thing that the people should turn on their own government for doing such stuff. Speaker 0: Mhmm. Speaker 1: Alright. The plucking of the pubic hairs. This one is great. Thus, for example, in August 1942, the prisoners were ordered by the German staff of the camp to have all their hair removed from their armpits and around their genitals as otherwise they would be shot. Not one prisoner. Yeah. Not one prisoner received a razor from the Germans, though the Germans knew well that they had none. The prisoners spent the whole of the night plucking out their hair with their hands and assisting one another. However, in the morning, the guards killed four prisoners and wounded three by rifle fire. Right? So this again never made it into the history books because it's wartime propaganda. Torture cabinets. Same thing. You know, they locked a bunch of guys, on New Year's Eve nineteen forty five, which they put in here New Year's Eve nineteen forty five because that's supposed to be especially cold, right, from a psychological perspective. Right? Oh my god. They did it to them on Christmas or New Year's Eve or you see what I'm saying? Yeah. So, like, the OSS had fun when they did this, and part of their creating and crafting rumors was that they would include a humorous twist when possible and for some reason that was baked into their system. Alright. The bars of Jewish Bars Speaker 0: of soap. Remember getting taught that one as a kid. Speaker 1: Yeah. So the bars of Jewish soap, these rumors first came out of World War one. In World War one, they had pretty explicit Speaker 0: methodology

@xGHOSTx990 - Alé (Lord/Majesty) ✝️

@badazn J3ws spread fake and false stories about what happened to them. Always playing a character: The Victim

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

One of the made up ways Nazis killed Jews was that they would make them climb up trees and then cut them down with the Jew mid tree. 😂 Obviously it’s all fake atrocity propaganda, but that didn’t stop these lies from being spread under oath at Nuremberg. Nuremberg is a lie. https://t.co/ztuISrg6Iv

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss a range of alleged Nazi atrocities and their subsequent debunking. The conversation opens with the claim that Treblinka never had gas chambers, only steam chambers, used to steam lousing facilities, with the implication that steam chambers could be repurposed for a homicidal use. They describe shock chambers as allegedly present at Treblinka, where the floor was electrified and people were killed by being walked into the room. The speakers then recount a “death by falling trees” method, in which several Soviet prisoners would be forced to climb a tree, and others would have to saw it down, causing the prisoners to fall and be killed. They move to “murder by atomic weapons,” with a claim that research into atomic energy produced an experiment where a small village, with temporary structures, housed 20,000 Jews who were eradicated almost instantaneously by a newly invented weapon, leaving no trace. They emphasize there was “no evidence again.” An “orchestra of death” is mentioned, including a description of executions in the Yanov camp carried out to the strains of the death tango, conducted by professor Strix with bandmaster Munt, and with a dog named Rex trained to harass and tear apart living persons. The discussion then touches on “gas chambers disguised as showers,” aligning this with wartime propaganda, and moves to “historical forgeries” claimed to have been displayed at Buchenwald, described as the creation of the OSS psych warfare team. The timing is noted as right after the war, suggesting these displays were created to illustrate Nazi horrors. The claim is that most of this material has since been debunked, with some pieces ending up at the Buchenwald Museum, which allegedly clings to the legend that the materials are real. The speakers note that the shrunken heads were fake, made from goat skin and horse hair, but claim that the lampshades are still insisted upon as real by some sources, despite being debunked. They conclude with a rhetorical question about why such things would be faked, implying a critical stance toward the authenticity of these legends. Overall, the transcript catalogs a set of sensational Holocaust-related claims (steam chambers, shock chambers, death by trees, atomic weapon extermination, orchestras, gas chambers disguised as showers, and shrunken heads) and juxtaposes them with statements that many of these claims have been debunked or identified as forgeries, while noting that some depictions persist in certain museum displays.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Morph the story because they're they're good at recycling stuff. You know? It's the oldest story and the newest clothes. So steam chambers. This is a good one because it was never alleged at Treblinka that there were ever gas chambers until around the nineteen seventies. It was always attested to that they had steam chambers. The reason for the steam chambers is because they had steamed the lousing facilities, and therefore they knew that they had something in the camp that they could put a homicidal twist on. Shock chambers, allegedly and this was at Treblinka. Allegedly the floor was electrified in a room and they would walk people in there and shock them to death. The death by falling trees, this is a good one. They invented the following method of murder. Several Soviet prisoners would be forced to climb a tree, and others had to saw it down. The prisoners would fall together with the tree and be killed. Speaker 1: Is this ridiculous how absurd this stuff is, but this could easily be you said this is all under oath testified? Speaker 0: Yes. All at Nuremberg. Murder by atomic weapons. So they're talking about, the research they did in atomic energy, and he says, yeah, the purpose was, of the experiment was to find a way to quickly and completely destroy people without delay and troubleshooting and again gassing and burning as it had been carried out with this experiment. A village small village was provisionally erected with temporary structures, and in it, 20,000 Jews were put. By means of this newly invented weapon of destruction, these 20,000 Jews were eradicated almost instantaneously and in such a way that left no trace. Right? There's the there's the we Speaker 1: don't have any evidence again. Speaker 0: Yeah. Exactly. Exactly. Right? Orchestra of death. Speaker 1: Oh my god. Speaker 0: So they had to justify why there were orchestras in the camps because there were orchestras in every camp. Mhmm. Right? In all the camps. So here it says, in the Yanov camp, the executions are carried out to the strains of the death tango played by an orchestra conducted by professor Strix, an internee in the camp together with his band master, Munt. And it says, behind him is his dog Rex, known to us through many interrogations as having been trained to harass living persons and later tear them to pieces. I'm assuming that's Rex, that little that little Speaker 1: dog Rex. He was like a bitch's killing machine. It makes sense they created Hollywood now. Speaker 0: And then gas chambers disguised as showers. Right? So, obviously, gas chambers disguised as showers falls right in line with all the other wartime propaganda. And then we have the historical forgeries. You know, all this stuff was, displayed at Buchenwald, and this is all fake. This is all creation of the OSS psych warfare team. Speaker 1: This was right after the war. Correct? They brought this out to show the horrors they'd done, and it was all created, like you said, by the propaganda team. Speaker 0: Right. And so all this has been debunked over the years. Most of this stuff has disappeared. Some of it ended up at the Buchenwald Museum. I was actually at the Buchenwald website earlier today, and they actually cling to the legend that this stuff is real. Speaker 1: Wow. And it's pretty much been debunked almost Right. Speaker 0: Proven. The only thing they say is fake is the is the shrunken heads. The shrunken heads were made from, like, goat skin and horse hair. Speaker 1: So they still try saying the lampshades are real even Speaker 0: though Speaker 1: they've been debunked. Oh. Speaker 0: A 100%. Speaker 1: So, yeah, all Speaker 0: this stuff is fake. And why would you fake this stuff? I don't know. But, you know, if you're going to

@xGHOSTx990 - Alé (Lord/Majesty) ✝️

@badazn The story about j3ws being made of soap and lampshades is a total fabrication and lie. But they still promote it TODAY. https://t.co/RFb2Zq1KKB

Video Transcript AI Summary
In never again. Never again will one and a half million Jewish children be turned into soap and ash and lampshades. Never again.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In never again. Never again will one and a half million Jewish children be turned into soap and ash and lampshades. Never again.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Father: My son, the bar mitzvah boy. How's the Haftarah studying coming? Theodore: Tears good. Father: Something that matter, Theodore? Theodore: Can I ask you a weird question? Father: Sure. Theodore: Do you think somebody could kidnap a kid and keep him underground? I'd get involved. Father: Underground? What is wrong with you? Theodore: Yeah, just keep him there in the sewers for months and months hurting him or I don't know. Have you ever heard of something like that? Father: Your grandparents escaped Buchenwald. Their entire families murdered. The skin of Jewish prisoners used for lampshades. What? Lampshades. We are Jews, Theodore. We know better than anyone the real horrors of this world. Reality is terrifying enough as it is. Cut it up with the fantasy.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: My son, the bar mitzvah boy. How's the Haftarah studying coming? Speaker 1: Tears good. Speaker 0: Something that matter, Theodore? Speaker 1: Can I ask you a weird question? Speaker 0: Sure. Speaker 1: Do you think somebody could kidnap a kid and keep him underground? I'd get involved. Speaker 0: Underground? What is wrong with you? Speaker 1: Yeah, just keep him there in the sewers for months and months hurting him or I don't know. Have you ever heard of something like that? Speaker 0: Your grandparents escaped Buchenwald. Their entire families murdered. The skin of Jewish prisoners used for lampshades. What? Lampshades. We are Jews, Theodore. We know better than anyone the real horrors of this world. Reality is terrifying enough as it is. Cut it up with the fantasy.

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

These fake shrunken heads and “lampshades” made of Jews were used as atrocity propaganda at the end of WW2. They are still considered “real” by established authorities, but are simply used to extrapolate reparations from White countries to support a country that shouldn’t exist.

@xGHOSTx990 - Alé (Lord/Majesty) ✝️

@badazn Germans was the most advanced nation. And had developed gasses that were deadly but never utilized. J3ws actually think you’re stupid enough to fool and be lied to.

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

“The Nazis had developed Sarin gas and Tabun. These are nasty deadly nerve gasses. The idea that they would use something like Zyklon B, which was an essential part of maintaining the health of the inmates, when they had sarin and tabun is ridiculous.” -Cory Hughes https://t.co/XEEIYtKCLR

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss Nazi chemical capabilities and the use of Zyklon B. Speaker 0 states that Nazis had developed sarin gas and tabun, "nasty deadly nerve gases," and argues that the idea they would actually use Zyklon B, which was essential for maintaining health in the camps, is ridiculous. Speaker 1 agrees, saying it seems ridiculous and that “the whole story” appears ridiculous once examined. Speaker 1 adds that years ago they investigated because it was illegal, noting changes over time, and that they felt compelled to keep quiet. Speaker 0 then shifts to logistics, noting that there are documents on trains that came in, the amounts of coke used in the crematoria, and that everything is well documented, including the number of people who actually made it to Auschwitz. He mentions Red Cross–related deaths as part of the documentation but the sentence trails off: “The deaths by the Red Cross I think were put.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Nazis had developed sarin gas and they had developed tabun and these are nasty deadly nerve gases and so the idea that they would actually use something like Zyklon b which was an absolutely essential part of maintaining the health of the people in the camps when they had sarin and tabun to me is is is ridiculous. Speaker 1: No. Yeah. It just seem it seems ridiculous that they would do that. Speaker 0: Right. Speaker 1: It's like The the whole story, if you actually start looking is like ridiculous. I mean, years ago, I looked because I was because I told it was illegal and you looked if it but things are a lot different different back then. I was like, oh, I guess I just gotta keep my mouth shut on this. Speaker 0: Yeah. There's a thing that they didn't really incorporate into the stories and that's logistics. Right? We have all the documents on all the trains that came in, the amounts of coke that were used in the crematoria. You know everything is pretty well documented, the number of people who actually made it to Auschwitz. The deaths by the Red Cross I think were put

@xGHOSTx990 - Alé (Lord/Majesty) ✝️

@badazn The German holocaust main points debunked here:

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

THREAD 🧵 9/13 Posts Europa: The Last Battle [Part 8] • The Holocaust – Expulsion vs Extermination • The Origin Of The “Six Million” Figure • The Allied Psychological Warfare • The Labor and Internment Camps • The Gas-Chambers • The Soap and Lampshades • The International Red Cross Report

Video Transcript AI Summary
The transcript presents an extensive compilation of claims from a group of speakers arguing that the established Holocaust narrative is false or exaggerated and that many historical incidents have been misrepresented or fabricated by Allied propaganda, Soviet influence, and Jewish-led organizations. The speakers frame Holocaust revisionism as a legitimate scholarly effort rather than denial, asserting that revisionists do not dispute that Jews and others suffered and died in the war, but dispute the scale, methods, and specifics of extermination. Key asserted points and claims - Holocaust definition and revisionism - The Holocaust is described as a belief that 6,000,000 Jews were murdered primarily by gassing in “shower rooms,” a narrative the speakers say is amplified by Hollywood, media, and schools. A growing movement of scientists, historians, engineers, journalists, and free-speech activists is portrayed as revisionist, though often branded as “Holocaust deniers” to discourage discourse. Revisionists are said not to deny persecution, deprivation of civil rights, deportation, internment, forced labor, or deaths in camps and ghettos, including deaths from disease; they also say that many victims died in ways other than genocide and that many victims’ dignity is not denied. - Internment and civilian camps in the United States - After Pearl Harbor, over 100,000 people of Japanese descent on the Pacific Coast were interned by Executive Order 9066; the text claims this restricted freedoms, required identity cards, and denied compensation or war reparations. The narrative includes accounts of interned individuals describing camp life, guard presence, and harsh conditions. - General wartime devastation and context - The war is described as a conflict that would not have occurred if “international jury” had not declared war on Germany in 1933, with emphasis on typhus, subversion, and crowded camps as drivers of disease and death. The speakers stress that millions died across battlefields, ships, and cities, and that propaganda surrounding German crimes obscures Allied or Soviet misdeeds. - Claims about typhus, gas chambers, and cremation - Typhus epidemics are said to explain many deaths in camps; Cyclone B (hydrogen cyanide) is claimed to have been used for delousing and pest control rather than execution, with several speakers arguing that gas chambers as homicidal devices did not exist or were technically infeasible. They assert there is no scientific proof of gassing, no German documents proving extermination plans, and that cremation and delousing procedures served health purposes rather than execution purposes. - Expert testimonies and forensics are cited (e.g., Leuchter, Rudolf, Lift, Lindsay) to support the claim that the gas chambers could not have functioned as execution facilities, noting technical impossibilities such as lack of explosion-proof features, gasketed doors, or proper gas delivery systems. - Specific camp narratives and testimonies - The camps are described as having been centers of labor, medical care, and even cultural activity, with accounts of weddings, births, nurseries, orchestras, libraries, theater performances, and recreational activities. Some testimonies describe attempts to maintain humanity and morale under harsh conditions, including a piano in Block 1, children’s art, and soccer games. - Several testimonies challenge the image of mass exterminations, claiming instead that most deaths resulted from disease, starvation, and Allied bombing, and that Red Cross and Vatican inquiries found no evidence of homicidal gas chambers. - A number of survivor testimonials are presented as quotations or paraphrases challenging the notion of mass murder in gas chambers, with some individuals denying personal knowledge of gas chambers or mass killings. - Documentary, legal, and scholarly disputes - The Institute for Historical Review (IHR) and other revisionist scholars are described as measuring and challenging the established narrative, sometimes facing legal or financial pressure. The transcript cites various researchers and forensics teams (e.g., Leuchter, Krakov, Farison, Groff, Farison, Larsson) as having concluded that homicidal gassings were not technically feasible in the cited facilities. - It is claimed that many postwar figures and witnesses provided testimonies or stories later recognized as unreliable or fabricated, including famous Holocaust survivors whose accounts are presented as inconsistent or false. Names and cases (e.g., Herman Rosenblatt, Anne Frank, Elie Wiesel) are invoked to illustrate alleged fraud or manipulation, though these claims contradict well-established historical records. - Propaganda, media, and the so-called “Holocaust industry” - The text asserts that the Holocaust narrative is used as a tool to enforce globalist policy, promote multiculturalism, and suppress nationalist sentiments among white Europeans. It claims that ongoing denazification efforts, legal penalties for questioning the Holocaust, and control over media and online platforms are designed to suppress dissent and promote a one-sided portrayal. - There is a claim that “atrocity propaganda” and black propaganda have been used to shape public perception, with references to Sefton Delmer and Allied psychological warfare, and accusations that postwar trials and media representations were heavily biased or manipulated. - Population counts, mortality figures, and documentary evidence - Several sections contest the veracity of the commonly cited death tolls, the reliability of Red Cross and other international communications, and the authenticity of diaries and eyewitness testimonies. The transcript asserts that the Nuremberg trials did not use physical or technical evidence to establish gas chamber existence and that some documents used as proof were mistranslated or contextualized wrongly. - The piece repeatedly emphasizes that millions of Jews did not die in the camps, that the “6,000,000” figure is a symbolic or religious number, and that high-profile Holocaust narratives are part of a constructed orthodoxy. - Final framing - The speakers position Holocaust revisionism as a defense of free speech and historical inquiry, arguing that questioning the official narrative is essential to truth. They claim laws against denial suppress inquiry and that truth should stand on its own merits without legal protection. They also suggest that conflicting accounts, forged documents, and political agendas have shaped the popular memory of World War II. Note on structure and tone - The transcript interweaves personal testimonials, expert opinions, documentary references, and polemical assertions. It repeatedly contrasts “revisionists” with conventional accounts, often asserting that mainstream portrayals are driven by propaganda, financial interests, or political goals. The overall thrust is to challenge the conventional understanding of the Holocaust, question the evidentiary basis for extermination claims, and highlight alleged inconsistencies in survivor narratives and official records.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The Holocaust is the term used to spread the belief that 6,000,000 Jews were murdered by the Germans during World War two, primarily by gassing in makeshift gas chambers deceptively discussed as shower rooms. This narrative is often repeated in Hollywood, by the media and in the public school systems. However, a growing movement of brave scientists, historians, engineers, journalists and other free speech activists have investigated the official politically correct Holocaust story and found it to be exaggerated and even false. These brave people are today called revisionists but are often denounced as holocaust deniers by the media. This labeling technique is used to discourage discourse and discussion about this controversial subject. These revisionists do not dispute that Jews were persecuted, deprived of civil rights, deported, interned, and forced to work in concentration camps, or that Jews died in those camps and ghettos during the war when diseases became a major problem. Neither do they dispute that criminal communist partisans, which a majority of were Jews, were also killed by shooting and hanging during the war. The revisionists do not deny these Jews and other victims of the war their dignity. They do not deny the victims to be remembered and they do not deny to show compassion for any of the victims. No matter how they died, each and every one of these deaths was a tragedy as were the deaths of millions of others during this horrific war. Millions of people, mostly Europeans, suffered and died horrible deaths on battlefields, on the high seas, and in firebomb cities during a conflict that most certainly would never have happened had international jury not declared war on Germany in 1933. The evidence that the revisions used against the official holocaust narrative are numerous. We will now go through some of the most convincing of them. During World War two, enemies were interned in concentration camps to avoid attempts at subversion against nation. As an After the attack on Pearl Harbor, over 100,000 Japanese people who lived on the Pacific Coast were interned by Democrat President Roosevelt with no crime other than being born Japanese. Executive order 9066 signed by president Franklin Delano Roosevelt was issued on a premise that anyone of Japanese, German, and Italian descent could not be trusted and must be treated as an enemy. They were viewed not as individual people, but as a menace to be dealt with harshly. Thus, thousands of Americans of Japanese, Italian and German ethnicity were forcibly relocated and thrown into American concentration camps. Some were even forced to abandon their own homes and businesses. By rail car they were shipped off to the concentration camps over a thousand miles away. They were placed inside barbed wire fences with machine guns pointed down at them from watchtowers. They slept inside bug infested barracks and they were denied adequate medicines, shelter and supplies. Speaker 1: You know, we had this chain link fence all around the camp. And we lived maybe a quarter of a block away from the fence. And the fence was guarded by soldiers. They walked back and forth with their guns on their shoulders. I went up to the fence, and I heard a rustling in the grass. I really was kind of wistful for what was outside the fence and thinking, you know, I used to be able to do Speaker 0: Roosevelt wartime law restricted the freedoms and required identity cards for these prisoners. None of these inmates were ever compensated for the loss of property or the time they spent in concentration camps. No war reparations were paid to them, and no movies were dedicated to them. American World War II posters and other propaganda materials centered on race, which turned the war into a race war. They pounded it into the public's head that the Japanese and Germans were less than human, subhuman, even akin to rats. These caused numerous atrocities against civilians during the war as the American soldier was taught that these people were not even human. Speaker 2: All of the camps they built were in isolated spots. Speaker 0: 10 of them scattered throughout the American West and a couple in Arkansas. Speaker 3: Park Mountain, Poston, and Tule Lake were the largest. Tule Lake also housed those whose loyalty the government specifically questioned. The War Relocation Authority or WRA called them relocation centers. Speaker 2: I remember when they would say, well, you're being interned for your own protection. Well, as a 10, 11 year old kid, I knew that if I were in here for my own protection, why are the machine guns pointing in at us and not out? Speaker 4: We heard this young young man shouting and saying, as I recall something about they couldn't keep him there, that he was he was an American and he started walking out and the guard who was probably about 15 feet from him, just shot him in the stomach. Speaker 0: Concentration camps were in fact not unusual at the time. Finland and even neutral Sweden also interned communist in concentration camps, since communists could not be trusted. It was actually the British Jewish financiers who invented the concentration camps in Burr in October 1899 when they looked for gold and diamond in South Africa. In 1933, when international Jewry had declared war upon Germany, they formally established themselves as an enemy of Germany, which according to international law, gave Germany the legal right to disarm and intern the German Jews. After the repeated attempts of subversion, murders, and terror against the German people, the Jews had made themselves into enemies of the German nation. The National Socialists logically considered Jews as a direct threat to national security. Jews were overwhelmingly overrepresented in communist subversion. Jews with internationalist, communist, sinus, and Talmudic leanings were essentially operating as a fifth column and a Trojan horse within Germany, trying to destabilize the country for the Bolsheviks to take over. The Germans knew about the Jewish forces behind the Bolshevik revolution in Russia and the Red Terror that followed. Germany would be next in line, and hadn't the Germans stopped the Jewish Bolsheviks, the whole of Europe would have fallen. So this is why the communists, the greater part of which were Jewish, were interned in labor camps to get useful work out of them during the war until they could be deported. Speaker 5: When Germany realized that the Jews were responsible for her defeat, they naturally resented it. But not a hair on the head of any Jew was harmed. Not a single hair. Professor Tanzil of Georgetown University, who had access to all the secret papers of the State Department, wrote in his book and quoted from a State Department document written by Hugo Schonfeldt, a Jew who Cordell Hall sent to Europe in 1933 to investigate the so called camps of political prisoners. He wrote back that he found them in very fine conditions. They were in excellent shape. Everybody treated well, and they were filled with communists. Because the Jews happened to be maybe 98% of the communists in Europe at that time. And there were some priests there, ministers, labor leaders, masons, and others who had international affiliation. Speaker 0: Typhus, a fatal disease caused by the Rickettsia bacteria, ravaged the armies of both World War I and World War II and also claimed the lives of prisoners in those labor camps. Typhus has historically always been linked to wars and crowded conditions and is spread by external parasites such as lice, fleas, and ticks. The inmates in the German camps would have their hair in the louse through chemical showers or have their hair shaved off. Clothes and shoes were also discarded and replaced. Cyclone B was an insecticide and pesticide that killed the lice that carried typhus. This chemical was used to improve the inmate's health and reduce, not increase, camp mortality. Speaker 6: Zykton was used for a hygienic purpose, killing bugs, not Jews, that the gas chambers had clothing put in, not people. They were hygienic, not homicidal. And the alleged homicidal gas chambers that are written up in the book, huge Holocaust textbooks, these do not have any elevation of cyanide in the walls above normal background levels. And it's a pretty damn simple conclusion. Speaker 0: Cyclone B was produced by the German company Dagesch. It was also used since 1929 in The United States by the U. S. Public Health Service at the border with Mexico to delouse and disinfect Mexican immigrants that passed from URS to El Paso. DDT was later used as a more effective chemical. During the end of the war, Allied terror bombings destroyed most of German cities, infrastructure, food and water supplies, railroads and medicine factories. The labor camps could no longer be supplied with adequate food, and the situation in Germany deteriorated fast, and deadly typhus epidemics broke out in Germany's internment camps. Consequently, many of the prisoners could not be fed and were left to starve. By the time the Allied forces swept through Germany, they saw the warning signs outside of the camps: No Entrance Typhus Epidemic. Upon the liberation of the camps, they were met with a ghastly scene of prisoners in the last stages of typhus and piles of deceased and emaciated corpses. By that time, most prisoners had either died or were dying through starvation or typhus. The Allies were shocked and appalled to find the dire conditions of what their bombing campaigns had helped to create. Even after the Allies liberated the camps, thousands of prisoners died like flies. In fact, the death rate at Bergen Belsen actually increased after the British took over the camp. Footage was then recorded and shown to the international community, and Germany would once again be attacked and blamed. Speaker 7: You were on the scene in Belzan as a young man. Yes. Speaker 8: I went with a group of medical students and we arrived in Belson on 05/02/1945 and I first went to the on May 3. Himmler ordered the camp to be ceded on April 11 in order to stop typhus which was an epidemic spreading throughout Europe. The British came in, the tank division came in on April 15 at 03:00 and they did their best to segregate the typhus and the Speaker 7: dying the others. How many people were in the camp at the time when the British took over the camp? Speaker 8: I think there were about 57 or 60,000. Today. The British bombed everything and the Speaker 7: Americans that moved on their Speaker 8: homes so that getting food there was extremely difficult. The water supplies became contaminated with sewage Speaker 7: and the administration in the camp more or less broke down. Even let's say if the German camp administration had made maximum effort and had been given everything at hand, could they have prevented this? Speaker 8: There was no cure for typhus at that time. British put DDT which is an insecticide, everything in every body and in that way I think the typhus was contained but it was a great danger, People didn't realize it was typhus. Suppose fifty six percent of people died who got it. Speaker 7: Why are these bodies naked? I mean, some of them are so emaciated. Why don't they have their clothing on? Speaker 8: Well, they did, and then when they were pushed outside of the huts they had clothing on, but clothing was so scarce, everything was scarce, that the inmates would immediately rush up and take all the clothing off because it was a pity to waste it. That's why they were naked. Speaker 7: Did you see when you got there two weeks after the British Army took over, evidence of gas chambers the way propaganda has said that these Germans had in these camps, or was there any claim made to that effect? Speaker 8: No. I don't think it was ever thought that there was a gas chamber in Belsonburg. People were dying at five hundred a day by the way, rate five hundred a day. Speaker 7: Even under the British administration. Speaker 8: Under the British administration, yes. And what was happening was the English soldiers were giving people their food to people half starved and had very thin stomachs and the stomach would burst and then die. The inmates said that the conditions were, this was what the inmates said, the conditions weren't too bad until the end of '44 and then this mass immigration, but by the time they put in another 50,000, forty fifty thousand of course. Now Speaker 7: I read in German language books and I'm not sure if it's accurate or not, but that Britain broke a promise to those soldiers to let them go to their own lines and that there was rather brutal treatment on the part of some of the Speaker 8: British soldiers against those Germans. I didn't know where you read it because I never knew to find it but that's what we understood that most of them have been finished up. That really upset me because I thought that we were fighting a war for ideals and all that and this was the most dishonourable thing to agree to give the safe combat back to alliance and then those that stayed because the lot slipped away and beat them up. Speaker 7: Were you there during the time when the bulldozers were actually putting these bodies in the graves? In these long trenches that you see Speaker 8: in the The bulldozers, the bodies were being thrown in. Were put the truck went round every day and picked up the bodies outside the hut and then they were taken to where the bulldozers were dug the grave and they were thrown into the grave. Speaker 9: But we were all put into what looked like a great big bathroom I guess because they had these shower things at top and we were put onto benches. We were all stark naked, old and young. Of course the sexes were separated but we all had to sit in a row and what happened eventually is that they rained from the showerheads. They rained soap and water on us and the reason for that was that we had to be deloused. We were so full of lice through that, our hair was cut and they rained soap and water on us and I do not remember if there were any towels. So when I hear about the showerheads and the Holocaust and all of that, I know exactly what it was. That was soap and water raining down on us to de louse us. That's what it was. And where the story came from that those were dangerous showerheads, I don't know. That must have come out of the Russian propaganda. Speaker 8: It wasn't Speaker 10: like a lie. Steven Spielberg. Everybody in Schindler's List is waiting for the gas to come in Speaker 7: and lo and behold all it was Speaker 9: A soap and water came raining down on us in this great big, we call it banya, which is a Russian word for washroom. Bathroom. Bathroom. It was a big communal bathroom. It was huge I would say. It was the way I remember it of course I was little but the way I remember it I would say it was at least 30 by 30. It must have been built for that purpose to wash us down like dogs. The same for the cutting of hair, I mean we were all shorn bald in order to stop the lice, the louse problem that Everybody we had lice in the war, you know I mean this was just common knowledge that everybody had lice and then of course we had to be deloused and put into Germany. Speaker 10: So Jews cannot claim unique victim status? Speaker 9: No, cannot. And when I hear the stories about them losing their hair, big deal, none of us had hair. Yeah. So that that is that was my take Speaker 7: on it. Speaker 10: And how about the cattle cars? Speaker 9: Well, the cattle cars was pretty much the same story because we considered ourselves lucky if we could ride in a cattle car, of course, because then we did not we did not depend on horses. We did not have to walk on foot. Man, that was luxury to ride a cattle car. And yes, they were crammed full of people, and yes, it was very difficult, you know, to to travel like that. You couldn't often you could not sit, you had to stand because they were crammed full. Often there was not water, there was no food. That was this is how it was in those years. People were hanging on those cattle cars. When you see those pictures, that could have been us. We were like that in those years. That means nothing. The same when you see the bunk beds. My goodness, we were lucky if we had bunk beds where we could sleep at night. It meant we did not have to sleep outside in the snow. And frankly we never really heard much about the persecution of the Jews. We knew that there were executions happening in Russia but in Germany I do not remember a single time that I heard any of these stories ever or later on in South America for that matter. I have to struggle to find memories of even the slightest anti Semitism And it was one of my happiest times there because they were so kind to us and so good to us and played with us and gave us toys and know fussed over us. And never ever in all those times was any one of these young soldiers improper with us. Never. It's of the war, that is my happiest time. Speaker 0: Documents from the German camp shows an order that Heinrich Himmler, chief of the concentration camp, issued orders on 12/28/1942 that the death rate in the concentration camps must be reduced at all costs. The camps were mainly factories, and the loss of workers was hurting war production. Inspector of the camps, Ricket Glucks, responded to Himmler's order on 01/20/1943, Every means should be used to lower the death rates in the camp. Already in 1937, several German newspapers reported that murdering Jews would be punishable by death. Joseph Reinhardt had been sentenced to death for killing a Jewish merchant Abraham and his Gentile wife. Murder was murder, regardless of the victim. In the camps were camp complaint offices, where inmates could register complaints or make suggestions. A system of strict discipline for both guards and for inmates with severe punishment being handed out against those found guilty. If any guard would attack a prisoner, the guard would be punished for it, often with death. There was also a prison in the camp, where dangerous or criminal people were placed. The German SS arrested Bruckenwald commandant Karl Koch in 1943 for mistreating some prisoners. After an investigation, Koch was found guilty by SS judge Condor Morgan and shot. Jewish scholar Arnaud Mayer, a professor of history at Princeton University, acknowledged in his 1988 book about the Final Solution that more Jews perished at Auschwitz as a result of typhus and other natural causes than were executed. There is nothing murderous about cremation ovens. Many dead bodies were cremated because Auschwitz was built on marsh ground, hence decomposing typhus corpses with a poisoning the drinking water and spread fatal diseases. Ellis Island in USA had similar disinfection and cremation facilities as those in the German camps. In fact, the procedures at the German camps were essentially the same as those used at Ellis Island by The United States. They served the exact same purpose: to keep disease from spreading. Today in The United States, the use of crematoria is even more common than it ever was in Germany then. The mass killings and gassing stories originated with Soviet reports authorized by the known liars in genocidal mass murders around Ilya Ehrenberg and Joe Stalin, which then was spread by the Jewish owned New York Times. The story was spread just hours after Germany's surrender, which made it impossible for any falsely accused German to refute Soviet's claims. There is in fact no scientific proof that Jews were gassed. There is no evidence of gassing deaths. There are no German documents to identify any gassing victim. No order from Hitler. No mass graves of gassed Jews. At Nuremberg, the existence of the gas chambers was never even demonstrated. Thousands of secret German documents dealing with the concentration camps were confiscated after the war, but not a single one refers to a policy or program of extermination. In a letter to the US State Department dated 11/22/1944, the Red Cross, who were stationed in all of the camps, stated: We have not been able to discover any trace of installations for exterminating civilian prisoners. The Vatican and Red Cross interviewed thousands of freed camp inmates at the end of the war about the alleged gas chambers. The response was always the same: No, the detainees themselves have not spoken of them. All forensic chemical examination have disproven the use of cyclin B in the alleged homicidal gas chambers. U. S. Expert on execution technologies Fred Leuchter traveled to Auschwitz and covertly obtained samples from the alleged gas chambers. He had them tested and published his results. Based on chemical analysis on wall samples and on various technical arguments, Leucher concluded that the locations investigated could not then been or now be utilized or seriously considered function as execution gas chambers. Speaker 11: With the exception of the video photographer, I brought the same things that I would have normally brought to a prison in The United States I was doing a survey of their equipment. The draftsman was there to take and verify measurements. The drawings were made on-site and then reproduced when we returned to The United States to document everything we saw. I personally made photographs and produced a great deal of photographic evidence of the hardware and facilities that we found in Poland. And the video photographer, which was not a normal thing for me, was brought to document the fact that the forensic samples that I removed from the facilities, the control sample from the Lovesley facility Number 1 of Birkenau, and all of the other samples from the alleged gas execution rooms were properly taken, packaged, for and packaged for submission to the laboratories. I examined the facilities, and I made a determination that they were incapable of supporting the use of hydrogen cyanide gas for purposes of execution or otherwise. But additionally, it would be necessary to move remove samples, return them to The United States for testing at an independent laboratory to in fact confirm what my visual inspection indicated, that these facilities never in fact contained hydrogen cyanide gas. The requirements necessary in the design of a facility that contains a highly explosive and highly poisonous gas, You must have gasketed doors, no windows, means of getting the gas in, means of getting the gas out, something for heating the gas and the air to constantly keep the right temperature, explosion proof switches, lighting facilities, etcetera. None of these ever existed. We're talking about brick and mortar buildings without heat, with non explosion proof lighting, without gasketed doors, in some cases without doors at all, and with crematories that opened very close or adjacent to the facility. If these facilities were used for gas execution facilities, if those persons operating the facilities didn't gas themselves to death at the same time that the executees died, they certainly would have been blown to bits when the gas exploded from a spark arc in a switch, the heat of a light bulb, or the gas approaching and getting into the crematory furnace. I mean, it's just ludicrous to consider that these facilities could have been used as gas chambers. Speaker 12: None of the facilities examined at Auschwitz, Birkenau, or Lublin could have supported or in fact did ever support multiple executions utilizing hydrogen cyanide, carbon monoxide, or any other allegedly or factually lethal gas. Based upon very generous maximum usage rates for all the alleged gas chambers totaling some 1,693 persons per week And assuming these facilities could support gas executions, it would have required sixty eight years to execute the alleged number of 6,000,000 prisoners. Promoting these facilities as being capable of affecting mass, multiple, or even singular executions is both ludicrous and insulting to every individual on this planet. Speaker 0: Guillermo Rudolf is a chemist who knew '1, while working towards a doctorate in chemistry at the renowned Max Planck Institute for Solid State Physics in Stuttgart, began a scientific investigation of the credibility of the Leuchter report. His detailed chemical analysis concluded that Hydrocyonic Acid was not used in the buildings alleged to have been homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz. His report strengthens the findings of Fred Leuchter. The prominent Austrian engineer, Walter Liftel, also made a report concluding that the homicidal gassings were impossible for technical reasons and because they are incompatible with observable laws on nature. Lifter's report is further authoritative confirmation of the findings of Fred Leuchter. The American research chemist Doctor. William B. Lindsay also made careful examinations of the alleged gas chambers. After thirty three years of experience as a chemist, he declared and affirmed under oath, I have come to the conclusion that no one was willfully or purposefully killed with cyclone B in this manner. I consider it impossible. The Krakow Forensic Institute, Robert Farison, Fredrik Turban, John Ball, Carlo Matano, Jurgen Graf, Anne Sundal, David Macaldon and many others have carried out similar technical inspections of the alleged gas chambers have come to the same conclusion. A brave Jewish revisionist named David Cole made a groundbreaking documentary called Cole in Auschwitz in 1992. Today, there are many future length documentaries, analyses and commentary on the German labor camps. In 1999, Ricker Krieg, a qualified electronics engineer and his team of researchers carried out a high-tech exam of the soil in the alleged death camp Treblinka. Using ground penetrating radar for three weeks, the team found that the ground was never even disturbed, and core samples revealed no ash. The results obtained show with 100% certainty that mass scrapes never even existed in Treblinka or Belsic. There are in fact many mass graves in the East. However, this was where the Soviets massacred people. Today, it is well known that, for example, the Katy massacre was committed by the Soviets, but was blamed on the Germans after the war. Doctor. Charles Larsson, one of American's leading forensic pathologists as part of a US war crimes investigation team, performed more than 1,000 autopsies of the dead bodies in the German camps, and none showed any evidence of death by poison gas. If there had been gassings with carbon monoxide or cyanide, the indications would have been extremely dramatic and readily visible. The courses would have been bright, sherry red. Speaker 8: No Speaker 0: Prussian blue cyanide staining was found on walls in the alleged death chambers. Only in the delousing chambers are ample amounts of evidence of gassings, where cyclone B was used on clothes and bedding to stop the spread of typhus. The Auschwitz museum curator admitted that the Soviets created the homicidal gas chamber after the war by altering a German bomb shelter. In the bomb shelter presented to us as a homicidal gas chamber in Auschwitz, the communists removed the walls and made the infamous cyclone b holes in the roof to make it look like a real gas chamber. Speaker 13: Now when you go into that Cream of One building, you're gonna see it. It just looks kinda weird. It has all these dirt mounds all around it. You know, really, it looks like a a bomb shelter, and that's exactly what it was at the end of the war. It was a bomb shelter. They want you to think that 4,000,000 people went through Washwoods, and they made it look like all the people went through that camp there. But that building there was not capable or made for gassing people, alright, at all. I mean, you know, if you go inside it, they they they chop, holes in the roof at the end, and it's just ridiculous. I mean, there's no way people were were killed in that building. So they want you to believe that this is the building that people were gassed in. It just wasn't feasible that people were gassed in that building. Speaker 14: The thing now, that building, where they end the tour, that was never a gas chamber. There was a chimney next to it and there there there were four holes in the ceiling where the Zyklon B granules would be dumped and people would see the holes and they could explore them and look around. What I did in '92, I interviewed the man who was the director, the curator, for lack of a better word of the camp. And he admitted to me on camera, not a hidden camera shoot, it was an open two camera shoot in his office. It was me and my camera woman. And he admitted on camera that the building displayed as the gas chamber is not in its original state, that when the Soviets liberated the camp, that building was an air raid shelter, a very obvious, very clear air raid shelter. And then the Soviets remodeled it to look like what their conception of the gas chamber is. Now there's no backup evidence to prove that this building was ever a gas chamber. There's no Zyklon blue cyanide staining on the walls. There were no four holes in the roof to dump in the Zyklon b. The Soviets added those. There there had been dividing walls. Inside the room, the Soviets knocked those down to make it look like one big open chamber. They ripped up the bathroom facilities. You can still see the the drains in the floor. You can still see the holes where the toilet and the sink had led into, but they took out all the facilities and they carved a doorway where there had not been a door to make it look like there was a progression from the gas chamber to the oven room. But there was a lot of stuff that they didn't bother to cover up. There's a gigantic manhole right in the middle of the gas chamber. Yeah. A manhole that any adult, even a fairly hefty set adult can go down into. Now what that is, that was an escape hatch, was fairly standard design procedure that underground or partially underground bomb shelters would have an escape hatch in case, rubble or anything else prevented, the people inside from exiting the bomb shelter through the main door. So you have this manhole that no one had noticed for, at that point, Auschwitz, when I went there in 'ninety one, Auschwitz had been open to the West for over a decade, and no one ever noticed the damn manhole. And it's right there clear as day. The door to the chamber opens in. In other words, if you if it was a gas chamber and you stuck people in there and they they would all pile up against the door trying to bang their way out, they would die there. In order to open the door again, you'd have to push against a mound of 50, a hundred, two hundred, 300 bodies. The, the door locks on the inside, not the outside. In other words, the victims would be able to lock the Germans out, which is just kind of a silly thing to think of. Speaker 0: In January 1995, the prestigious French weekly magazine Le Express acknowledged that everything about this gas chamber is false, and that it is in fact a deceitful postwar reconstruction. French Jewish Olga Vorum Sarvnikot wrote a book about the National Socialist concentration camps in which she stated: Auschwitz, which was to remain the model camp and simultaneously the administrative center, had no gas chamber. A fake chimney was also built by the Soviets in 1947. It has no opening, and it is not even connected to the building. German prisoners were also forced to alter a shower room at Sachsenhausen to support a Soviet show trial, but the forgery was so crude and embarrassing that the communists had to knock down the building in 1952. Hundreds of people of all sorts came and went into the German working camps all day long, supplying the camps with food and supplies of all kinds. Yet no one has ever mentioned, and yet no one has ever admitted to seeing any evidence of homicidal gas chambers, required, the thousands of dead bodies every hour or the dust. Aerial photos show the same lack of evidence. Detailed Allied aerial investigation photographs taken of the German camps every day during the 1944 when made public in 1979. Not even CIA experts could find the slightest trace of piles of human corpses, smoking crematorium chimneys, or masses of Jews awaiting deaths or gassing. The horrifying pictures of heaps of corpses we have been shown as proof of a systematic extermination of Jews by the evil Nazis are in fact misleading. All footage of dead camp inmates are of those who died of typhus and malnutrition in Western camps during the final weeks of the war, and this is confirmed by German military, Red Cross, and British military medical records. Even mainstream historians now agree that mass murders or homicidal gassings never took place in any of the camps from where the Allied footage are taken. Unfortunately, this is never pointed out whenever the footage is shown. So they try to sell you a story, but now you know the truth. In fact, the Allied saturation bombings are directly responsible for many of these tragic deaths. It is also important to note that most of these dead bodies are not even Jewish. A large number of the bodies were in reality the direct result of Allied bombing and strafing attacks. Images of Nordhausen are used all over the major media, but it has been proven that these prisoners were blown up and strafed by British warplanes, and they were not exterminated by the Germans as the official story goes. Speaker 15: And there I had over 4,000 prisoners laying on tuberculosis. Sick. What are doing with tuberculosis? No no medications, nothing, hardly food. It was very meager already. The Germans didn't have to eat. And all of a sudden, it was April 3 at 03:00, alarm and American air force over us on drop the bombs just on our camp. But the whole camp was entirely destroyed. And out of this, 4,000 people, we were 200 survived. Because they died there, they were in the camps, you know, hanging in the ceiling, dead bodies, and it was awful. It was burning days and days. We were still if this is the nurses, the doctors, administration people who work in this nation, we run away. And the Americans made a mistake because they didn't know this is a concentration camp. They knew it is a military camp. They emptied the military a month before or in January, we put us in. You see? So they didn't know. So they came back at 09:00 in the morning and hit the whole city. The whole city, they flattened. We ran away in the wood in the in the fields. And when they emptied the the planes, they came and strived us with machine guns. Know? They could know who it is. These are Germans. You know? And we went into the woods, but we remained about a week in the woods. And we ate only the raw potatoes. Speaker 0: What about all these pictures? Well, you have seen dead primarily political prisoners, either killed by starvation, disease, indirectly or due to allied bondings. When the Soviets took over the camps, they were reopened and filled with Germans and other anti communists. After the communists had tortured and starved them to death, photos of these prisoners were also passed off as victims of Hitler's holocaust. Pictures from these massacres committed by the Soviets and even dead Germans from the allied bombings of Dresden were also spliced into the propaganda and used as proof of Jewish dead. Even though we now know the truth about the footage, the pictures have now become emblematic of the holocaust, and our media still use them to mislead the public. The leading think tank for Holocaust revisionism is the Institute for Historical Review, an independent and non profit organization committed in the education of World War II. In 1979, IHR publicly offered a reward of $50,000 for verifiable proof that the homicidal gas chambers existed. It was challenged by Mel Marmelstein, a Hungarian born Jew. He declared that he saw his mother and two sisters lured into gas chambers. He used his own autobiographical memoir By Bread Alone as proof. In the book, he describes how his father told him that his mother and sister had been burned alive. He would later say in his book that his uncle heard that his mother and sister had been led to the gas chambers. He would change his story once again in a letter published in a California newspaper saying that he had witnessed his own mother and his two sisters being led through a tunnel to Gas Chamber 5, even though there was no Gas Chamber 5 or a tunnel that led to it. Judge Thomas Johnson of the Superior Court of California ruled against IHR and rewarded the Maramel sign 70,000 stating that the gassings of the Jews is not a reasonable subject to dispute as it's simply a fact. It was reported already during World War one that the Germans and their allies were using gas chambers to kill thousands of prisoners. Jewish controlled media even had used the magical numbers 6,000,000 and the magical words extermination and holocaust. An article printed in Britain's The Daily Telegraph on 03/22/1916 stated that the Austrians and Bulgarians were killing people by shutting them up in churches and suffocating them with poison gas. Some of the other propaganda lies said that the Germans were cutting off children's hands, crucifying Canadian soldiers, making human soap in a corpse factory, gauging out the eyes of civilians, cutting off the hands of the teenage boys, raping and sexually mutilating women, giving children hand grenades to play with, and bayoneting babies. After the end of the war, Stanley Baldwin admitted in parliament that it all had been propaganda and that no such gas chambers had existed. He also apologized publicly to the German people for this racist slur on them. On 12/02/1925, British foreign secretary Austin Chamberlain admitted that none of the atrocity propaganda was true and hoped that it would never happen again. After World War II, this false anti German propaganda was spread once again. During and after World War II, the Allies used atrocity propaganda against Germany to distract people from the atrocities being committed primarily by the Red Army. In a 02/29/1944 letter to the BBC and higher members of the British clergy from the British Ministry of Information read, We know the methods of rule employed by the Bolshevik dictator in Russia itself from for example the writing and speeches of the prime minister himself during the last twenty years. We know how the red army behaved in Poland in 1920 and in Finland, Estonia, Latvia, Galicia and Bezerabia only recently. We must therefore take into account how the Red Army will certainly behave when it overruns Central Europe. Unless precautions are taken, the obviously inevitable horrors which will result will throw an undue strain on public opinion in this country. We cannot reform the Bolsheviks, but we can do our best to save them and ourselves from the consequences of their acts. The disclosure of the past quarter of a century will render mere denials unconvincing. The only alternative to denial is to distract public attention from the whole subject. Experience has shown that the best distraction is atrocity propaganda directed against the enemy. Unfortunately, the public is no longer as susceptible as in the days of the corpse factory and mutilated Belgian babies and the crucified Canadians. Your cooperation is therefore earnestly sought to distract public attentions from the doings of the Red Army by your wholehearted support of various charges against the Germans and Japanese which have been and will be put in circulation by the ministry. In other words, the letter can be summed up like this. We all know the crimes like the Holodomor and the Red Tarot committed by the Bolsheviks over the last twenty four years. It is inevitable that they would do the same in Central Europe. We will cover up their crimes by lying about the Germans. The public is not as stupid as it was. Our lies will be better. You must spread these lies convincingly. This reminds us that truth really is the first victim of war. This was essentially the start would turn into what we know today as the Holocaust, as the control media starting spitting out even more horrific propaganda against Germany. Basically, everything that the propaganda blamed Hitler and the Germans for were the Bolsheviks themselves guilty of. Speaker 16: Propaganda allowed these crimes to happen, and then propaganda took over when the crimes were committed and basically projected the crimes back upon the vanquished. The victors just turned it around and blamed everything on those they had slaughtered and raped. Speaker 6: After the war, where did all these stories come from, which we hear now no end of? It came part it became because the Jews realized they were gonna get Israel out of it as a motivation for telling stories. And then as well as that, as in fact, well enough, Germany starts giving funds for every so called holocaust survivor. Holocaust survivor just has to have a story about them being in Europe and surviving the holocaust, and then they get money from Germany. So you got a reward for every every story. Speaker 0: The Jewish British journalist, Sefton Delmer, was the head of black propaganda. Black propaganda is false information and material that purports to be from a source of on one side of a conflict, but it's actually from the opposite side. It is typically used to vilify, embarrass, or misrepresent the enemy. OSS, forerunner of CIA, also faked documents and diaries. Revisionists are convinced that the black propaganda is a fundamental factor behind the holocaust propaganda. Atrocity propaganda is how we run the war, and we're only really beginning with it now. We will continue this atrocity propaganda. We will escalate it until nobody will accept even a good word from the Germans, until all the sympathy they may still have abroad will have been destroyed, and they themselves will be so confused that they will no longer know what they're doing. Once that has been achieved, once they begin to run down their own country and their own people, not reluctantly, but with eagerness to please the victors. Only then will our victory be complete. It will never be final. Re education needs careful tending, like an English lawn. Even one moment of negligence, and the weeds crop up again. Those indestructible weeds of historical truth. In September 1940, Sefton was recruited by the Political Warfare Executive to organize black propaganda and allied psychological warfare. Sefton's special method was lying as exactly as possible, so that the lies couldn't be uncovered right away. Until 1947, Delmer coordinated the black propaganda campaign with the French, the Soviets, and the Americans. During this period, he and his staff forged German documents about alleged German war crimes, which reached official files. Delmer provided the documents to the British Ministry of Information, which in turn sent them to the Nuremberg trials as official documents. Without checking whether the documents were true or false, they were presented as evidence of generally known facts. The propaganda after the war blamed Germany for starting the war, censored all Allied atrocities, and depicted the Soviet Union as a Utopia. General Eisenhower also rounded up German villagers and forced them to see what they had done. Audiences were horrified by newsreel footage of the Nazi concentration camps. One full length film directed by Eisenhower showed the shrunken heads of inmates and lampshades that supposedly were made from human flesh. German civilians were rounded up and forced to view it all to install shame and horror in them. Within the week of the capture of Buchenwald, the Jewish Hollywood director Billy Wilder was in the camp making a film of propaganda lies that still circulate to this day. The film was called Deathmills, Die Torensmulle in German, and was made for the psychological warfare department of the US Department of War. Its purpose was to indoctrinate the Germans to believe that the National Socialists were evil in order to shame the Germans away from nationalism and racial consciousness. The film claimed that the Nazis made soap from the fat of Jewish prisoners, made lampshades from the skin of prisoners and shrunk the heads of prisoners like in the Amazon. Modern science has determined these horrific claims from Buchenwald and Bergen Belsen to be absurd Allied propaganda. It all has been debunked as fabrication. Even Jewish scholars as Lipstadt now admit that these were all propaganda lies. DNA tests proved that the shrunken heads were fakes. The soap was ordinary soap. The lampshades were made of goat leather, and there were never any homicidal gassings at the camps. Tales of gas chambers disguised as shower rooms are wartime atrocity fiction, similar to previously debunked claims about Jews being made into soap and lampshades. The shrunken heads hoax was the creation of Albert D. Rosenberg, a Jewish officer serving in Eisenhower's psychological warfare unit. Even though these things have been debunked as hoaxes, they are repeated by the lying, hate filled scientists. Speaker 17: They would kill the infants and make lampshades out of baby skins or soap or baby fat. Speaker 18: I I showed a pit in Auschwitz where they made soap from people. They throw in people and took the fat and make soap for the Speaker 11: German military, boiling water, Speaker 19: big pool. We have soap made out of human beings. Speaker 11: R I f meant rhein judesh fat. Pure Jewish fat. Speaker 20: RJF. And RJF meant Rein Yudicious fat translated clean Jewish fat. Pure Jewish soap. You know, fat. Speaker 15: Pure Jewish fat. Speaker 9: Yeah. Piece Speaker 21: of soap He said, made out of Jewish fat. Speaker 0: In 1944, another book was written which advocated the denazification and mass psychological brainwashing of the German people. It was called What to Do with Germany and was written by prominent Benei Breth member Louis Nietzsche. Nietzsche was a wealthy Jewish lawyer from New York and was also a colleague of Theodore Kaufmann and Henry Morgenthau, Franklin D. Russell's Secretary of the Treasury and the author of the Morgenthau Plan. Nietzsche wanted to turn the Germans into brainwashed, conservative zombies. National Socialist teachers will be replaced. Media would demonize and dehumanize the German people. National socialism would be depicted as the most evil ideology. German books would be destroyed in huge book burnings to destroy German culture and the collective German memory. As part of the propaganda campaign to demonize Germans, the Soviets and others also forged many photographs which are used to represent Holocaust atrocities. Pictures of dead Germans now became pictures of dead Jews. Pictures of National Socialists became pictures of evil racist Nazis. Photos of German refugees became photos of Jews. The anti German propaganda that started after the war by the Jewish owned media was going to continue for over seventy years in the future. During an appearance on the Larry King television show, actor Marlon Brando dared to comment that Speaker 22: I think that I I'm angry with some of the Jews. I'm very goddamn angry at some of the Jews. Hollywood is run by Jews. It's owned by Jews. And they should have a a a greater sensitivity about the issue of of people who are suffering. Speaker 0: Ariel Sharon admitted in 2001 that we the Jewish people control America and the Americans know it. The Jewish supremacist journalist Elad Nirai said, Let's be honest with ourselves here, fellow Jews. We do control media. Got so many dudes up in the executive offices in all the big movie production companies, it's almost obscene. Did you know that all eight major film studios are run by Jews? Joel Stein, columnist for the Los Angeles Times, in his column in the LA Times in 2008, Stein says that Americans who think the Jews do not control Hollywood and the media are just plain dumb. He says I want America to know of our accomplishment. Yes, we control Hollywood. I don't care if Americans think we are running the news, media or Hollywood, Wall Street or the government. I just care that we get to keep running them. Jews totally run Hollywood, Stane proudly admits. He then goes on to provide a long, long list of Hollywood media owners who all are Jews to prove his point. Today, six Jewish companies control 96% of the world's media. The so called denazification has never stopped. For seven decades, we have only heard one side of the story. There have been thousands of books, films and TV series dedicated to the Holocaust to frighten people from the National Socialist ideology. One of the most known movies that has influenced how people see Germany's role in World War two has undoubtedly been the Schindler's List, sold out to the public as a true story and filmed in black and white for a claim to authenticity. Despite this fictional film containing nudity and murder, it is continually shown in European and American schools as mandatory viewing for history education. It portrays the Germans as evil monsters who only cared for one thing killing innocent Jews. However, the film was based upon a fiction book called Schindler's List, which won the LA Times Book Award for Fiction, authored by Thomas Cannelley. The author himself has no experience of the camps. So, here we have a film being shown to our children as truth when it's actually based upon a work of fiction. In other words, it is not truth. Names, characters, places, and incidents are either products of the author's imagination or are used fictitiously. Impressionable children in middle school are also instructed to read The Diary of Anna Frank, which now probably is the pinnacle of the Holocaust theory. The 15 year old girl Anna Frank and her father Otto Frank were deported from The Netherlands to Auschwitz in September 1944. Otto was treated in the hospital at Auschwitz. Several weeks later, in the face of the advancing Soviet army, Anne was evacuated along with many others to the overcrowded Bergen Belsen camp. Tens of thousands of Jewish survivors chose to leave Auschwitz and go west by January 1945, with the very same people who had supposedly been murdering them every day for years. Anne Frank died of typhus in March 1945. However, the original diary manuscript was forensically examined by the German state forensic bureau, the Bundescriminal Amt. Their analysis determined significant portions of the work were written with a ballpoint pen. Since ballpoint pens were not available to everyone before 1951, portions of the work were added well after the war. Handwriting experts determined after closer examination of the originals that all of the writing in the diary was by the same hand and the BKA determined that none of the diary handwriting matched known examples of Anne's real handwriting. The true author of the diary was Jewish novelist Mayor Levine, who demanded and was awarded $50,000 in payments for his work in a court action against Anne's father, Oto Frank. The truth about the Anne Frank diary was first exposed in 1959 by the Swedish journal Friyaoud. It established that the Jewish novelist Mayor Levine had written the dialogue of the diary and was demanding payment for his work in a court action against Otto Frank. An extract from the Swedish articles appeared in the American Economic Council letter 04/15/1959, as follows: History has many examples of myths that live a longer and richer life than truth, and may become more effective than truth. The Western world has for some years been made aware of a Jewish girl through the medium of what's purposed to be her personally written story, Anna Frank's diary. Any informed literary inspection of this book would have shown it to have been impossible as the work of a teenager. A noteworthy decision of the New York State Supreme Court confirms this point of view, in that the well known American Jewish writer, Major Levine, has been awarded $50,000 to be paid him by the father of Anne Frank as an honorarium for Levin's work on the Anne Frank diary. Evidence compiled by Doctor. Robert Farison of France establishes that the famous diary is a literary hoax. After doing substantial research, Professor Farisen stated, The truth obliged me to say that the diary of Anne Frank is only a simple literary fraud. The Jewish German communist Bruno Baum admitted to being one of the main fabricators of propaganda at the Auschwitz camp. He said, it is no exaggeration when I say that the majority of all Auschwitz propaganda was written by ourselves in the camp. We carried out this propaganda in for the world public until our very last day of presence in Auschwitz. The evil Germans actually went to great lengths to keep the inmates well fed, well housed, and entertained in the German camps. The camps had decent sufficient food until the last weeks of the war when the allies had bombed all infrastructure of Germany into oblivion. Speaker 19: We also had a an orchestra where some of the musicians stand stood together, together and and one one musician was so good that he had the instruments playing and he wrote the notes, so later on we had a band who played over the weekend. And, that was of course helping us, you know, we also did plays and stuff. Speaker 9: Were there any cultural activities happening in Auschwitz? Speaker 21: Yes. I told you we had a piano put into a not just a piano, a grand piano was brought into Block 1. Once that was built, that new block, the downstairs room was assigned for theatre. When he wanted to build a stage curtain in that New Block 1, which was one big dining room was going to be also a business stage, so performances could be done for women there, culture. He said, for heaven's sake, isn't there anybody anybody here who can help me sew on these curtain rings for the stage? I do it for you, he says. And I came forward and I helped him with the curtain stage and that was wonderful because I had a man sitting across me for a change. And my roommate is in charge of work assignments. And if you happen to know music, what instruments do you play? I said, I learned piano, but not good enough for an orchestra. I can tell you that right now. He said, well then maybe you know the notes. I said, yes. He said, well then I can use you because we have to write it from the original music piece what the director gets to the instruments. And so for each instrument has only short line on the whole paper. So I had to take it apart and write for each instrument. From that what I had to do. I had to even make the lines. We didn't have paper that was pre printed for notes, nothing. So I spent the whole day there for a while until we were taken away from Auschwitz. But then she saw me work there. I had a big table where I could work and lay out all the paper and it was very peaceful and relaxing. And Otto wanted to talk more to me. That is when I met that SS man at one time. That was the last job I did while I was in Auschwitz. And when I the other job that when I was in Block 10, we went out to pick the leaves and from these leaves they would make tea for the whole camp, for the whole Auschwitz. Speaker 23: How did you entertain yourself, Speaker 24: Well, there were at that at the beginning of those days, there was a library where people could get books to read. There were newspapers which we could get, and that and also among ourselves sometimes we had what do call, a violin quartet used to come and play in barracks. And they even later on, they said they're gonna build a movie in the camp. And the prisoner the prisoner said said, oh, you must be crazy. They're gonna make a movie for us in the camp. And then what happened? They made a movie in the camp. Yeah. And we we went in barracks after barrack. We we could go to see a movie sometimes in the evening. They brought movies in in the evening. Speaker 23: What kind of movies would they show? Speaker 24: German movies. Once I came to the main camp, they were allowed twice a month to write home. Once a postcard and once a letter. Speaker 23: They gave you the materials? Speaker 24: Yeah. They gave us the letter, the materials, so they we could Speaker 23: How did Speaker 20: you get the stamps? Speaker 24: The stamps. We could buy stamps. We could Speaker 9: You had money? Speaker 24: Yeah. We got my still got my with the money we got through the Jewish community from Vienna who sent us everybody some money. Speaker 23: And and in the camp you could have currency? Speaker 24: Yeah. They could have money because there was in camp also what they call a cantina, and not many times, but once in a while they sold a few cigarettes or they sold something, whatever they had. So if you had money, you could buy in that cantina there. Food, there wasn't really any food really. They usually sold and sometimes they sold they sold some weak beer that sold also in the in the yeah. But not really anything else, not much. Mostly cigarettes. Speaker 23: And when you went to the movies, did you have to pay? Speaker 24: Yes. We had to pay. After the the money stopped, the regular money stopped, we got paid in coupons then. Speaker 23: Paid for your work? Speaker 24: Well, I don't know if it was for whatever. We got paid for in coupons for which were redeemable in the in that canteen if they had something. So that was their their way of distributing money then to everybody, everybody got this money then. Speaker 19: Of course what we did is for the weekends we got together, we got a group of us together and we made a soccer team which was a little later where we played soccer. It's amazing Speaker 0: that there would be a soccer team, that there'd be enough energy left to do something like Speaker 19: energetic as we were with the other regular team, but we did something to, you know, it kept our mind off the problems we had. Speaker 25: Especially the Germans start losing the war, 1943, 1944. So 1944 we had soccer games in Rosrose. Soccer teams, we had organised very well, soccer teams, each nationality organized soccer teams and we organized our equipment and everything to play soccer on the assembly line, on the assembly place. Speaker 20: In Gross Rosen. Speaker 25: In Gross Rosen. So you know that much free air was in there but it was like the 1440s. Russians already pushed away, Americans already invaded on the other side so there they had to give more freedom. But that was much more freedom and food didn't improve very much because simple reason, they didn't have it very much themselves. Speaker 26: Did the civilians try to help you at all? Did they trade goods for things? Speaker 25: It's as I say, we have almost everything, what we wanted, whether it's soccer teams, from the civilians, from outside civilians. But that was strictly on the cover. SS didn't know that. They knew it but they didn't do much about it because they knew the war was almost over so they didn't, they even played soccer with us. Just to make the store funny, the toy incident funny that one time the Polish team played against German teams and one of the top enlisted SS men decided he wants to play for the Polish team. So we say okay, you can play for us. And then the commandant, commandant, SS commandant, he was like a captain. He decided to want to play for the German team. So he went in the field. I think they were a little bit tipsy. Speaker 26: How did you feel about that? Speaker 25: And the funny part of it, we said, just let them play, they play almost by themselves. We just run around them. But that was one of the incidents which stuck so funny in it. But that's happened, it was 1944, it almost things came to close. Speaker 26: So is what you're saying then that the closer the end of the war came, pressure was let up rather than Definitely. Becoming more cool or Speaker 25: In our camp, pressure you you did feel the pressure. Speaker 0: There were weddings and even maternity wards for pregnant women. Inmates were falling in love and getting married in the camps. Over three thousand live births were registered in Auschwitz alone, with not a single infant death, while it was in operation under German rule. The evil Nazis even set up a nursery for the children. Speaker 20: Freddy Hirsch called me to the children's barracks, he was heading then, and he asked me if I could paint something on the wall for the children. And I said, well, if you can get the materials, he said, I'll get the materials. I said, okay. And then a very handsome young blonde man from the men's camp came over one day. And Freddie Hirsch called me to come and meet him and he asked me what I need. So I said, well, if I can get any wall paints or any tempera paints, I would like those. If you can get me some, and he said, yes, anything you want. And so before I knew it, Freddie had the stuff ready for me. And I started painting. At first, not knowing what, I looked at that huge drab. It was kind of olive colored, like all the barracks were wall. And I thought, well, the thing to do is to make it look like we are in a Swiss chalet on the deck, and there is a balustrade with flowers and flower pots on it. And we are looking out at the beautiful meadows and maybe see some cows and sheep and stuff. And I started painting. And then afterwards, far in the distance, I was putting some sheep and some cows. And then I noticed that all the kids were standing around me, behind me. So I turned around and I asked them if they would do they have any special wish what to put in that meadow? And they said Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs. And that was a very surprising answer. So I made a painting of Dopey standing on another dwarf's head with a cloak around him so he looked like a tall guy, so he would be as tall as Snow White. And they were dancing together, and the shoes, those soft shoes and everything. And the kids loved it. And I made some other dwarves around, one who was playing the accordion. I think there was Grumpy, the mean one. And the professor with the glasses. I made almost all the dwarfs standing around. Some of them were clapping, and that's what the kids like. I now understand that there was another painter who continued something painting on the walls after I've left. I don't know about that. Speaker 27: When you were in the process of doing that Yeah. What did it do not only for for you, but for the for the children on on an emotional level. Speaker 20: Well, it did several things, not just emotional, but the children then wrote a play which was a satire of Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs. So I figured out a way of making a crown out of paper, and the kids were painting it gold and putting, like, jewels on it. And then I took some paper strips, and I painted them with a black paint. And I don't know about the costumes, what what they made costumes out of, but the play was very successful because the little girl who was, playing Snow White had an incredible voice, a gorgeous soprano, just like the one that you hear in the movie. Speaker 27: How were they allowed to put on a play in Auschwitz? Speaker 20: I don't know, but it was done kind of quite hush-hush, all of it, except that when it was put on, suddenly some SS men appeared, and they watched. And then when Arnold Behm put on that play, he he wanted something like a Wardville Wardville play, which I was into. That was when I couldn't stand the breath of the guy who was playing with me. Speaker 0: The building just left entering Auschwitz was actually a brothel used by the internees of the camp. Hospitals and camp dental facilities attended by camp inmates, dentists and nurses to deal with the inmates dental problems. The Auschwitz Camp had sick base and hospitals where thousands of inmates were cured. The camp authorities' former master garrison physician Doctor. Wirths tried all imaginable ways to keep the Auschwitz inmates alive, strong and healthy. The Holocaust is the only claimed genocide which is sold by people who by their own accounts were treated in hospitals in the so called extermination camps. The inmates also built an elegant Olympic sized swimming pool, complete with several diving boards, where they would sunbathe while watching the water polo matches on Saturday and Sunday afternoons. According to official figures, there were five and twenty three thousand Jews in Germany in January 1933. The Courhaire report reveals that as of December 1942, there were only 9,127 Jews in all the concentration camps. Officials from the International Red Cross visited the camps regularly and had complete access to the camps, documented everything and estimated the total debt from all the camps to be around 271,000 to 290,000. About half of these dead were Jewish. So we are now talking about some 150 to 200,000 Jews that died in the German camps, primarily of disease. In the sixteen fifty page Red Cross report, there was never a mention of any gas chambers. There basically were four categories in turn during the war. Poles, Jews, Russians and political prisoners, sometimes alluded to as Germans. Jews made up less than 40% of Auschwitz, only around 12% of Dachau, and only around 30% of Buchenwald. Speaker 6: You've got prisoner of the death books of Auschwitz, which is the most reliable source. The Soviets confiscated all the information about life and death of people living in Auschwitz when they liberated the camp, and those were finally published in the nineteen nineties. And those give you a total, What is it? 29,000 Jews die in Auschwitz throughout the world war two. Okay? And you've got somewhat more Catholics die. You've more Catholics and Jews dying in Auschwitz. And if you wanna say, oh, there's some missing data there, some Jews not registered who died and so on. Well, you can put it up at very most, I would say, four forty thousand Jews die dying at Auschwitz. Now, I don't allow it to go any higher than that. And that is a 100 times less than the 4,000,000 plaque at Birkenau after the war. Soviets put that totally absurd figure. Speaker 0: Number of dead at Auschwitz was revised in 1989 from 4,100,000 down to 1,000,000. Upon capture by the Soviet Union, original propaganda also claimed that 2,000,000 were murdered in Majdanek, which included seven homicidal gas chambers. Five of these seven have been admitted to never even assert as homicidal gas chambers. Number of dead at Majdanek was revised in 2005 from 2,000,000 to seventy eight thousand. But somehow, the official account of 6,000,000 dead remained unchanged. So, what is six million, minus four million, minus 2,000,000? The Holocaust is the only claimed genocide where millions can be reduced from the total claimed to be killed, but the total figure always remains 6,000,000. The British secret service had cracked the German top secret enigma code and had access to most German military communications by 1942, and there were no references in the decrypts to gassings. Speaker 6: Well, it's the most most reliable authoritative source you could possibly have because Britain was overhearing the German radio messages when the Germans didn't know they were being intercepted. And by the the Enigma code Enigma code breakers got these messages, and and after fifty years, they've finally been released in the National Archives. In the mid nineties, they were put out. Historians takes no no interest in these decreeps for the obvious reason that they show no sign of any holocaust going on. Okay? That they show different ethnic groups being moved around, different labor camps. For example, Jews coming to Auschwitz and Jews leaving Auschwitz. The four main categories, Poles, Russians, Jews, German political prisoners, that they group the inmates as and there's they show the great endeavor to get useful industrial work out of the inmates. They they discuss the different kinds of work they're trying to do and what resources they need or ordering stuff that can be done. And then they describe the shattering impact of typhus epidemic breaking out, especially at Auschwitz in the '42 and the struggle to be able to cope with it and get it under control and the sense of horror as the whole of Auschwitz Camp was quarantined as as the epidemics took their toll. The decrypt show that the only thing people were basically, they were killed if they tried to escape. There guards shooting anyone trying to escape, but otherwise, you know, there are rules for treating inmates properly, and the SS guards had to treat them properly and could be court martialed if they didn't. Inmate could put in a complaint if they weren't treated properly. Speaker 0: Letters recently found in the archives proved that US and German top level government officials talked with each other through Swiss and Irish consuls in 1944 to 1945 about the conditions of inmates in German operated camps. Germany guaranteed to evacuate inmates to save them from the Soviets, and former camp inmates confirmed inmates were being safely evacuated. The Allies confirmed the Germans were helping inmates, not murdering them. Several sources including the World Almanac Red Cross documentation, the New York Times and the Chambers Encyclopedia shows that the Jewish population recorded does not reflect the testimonials given on the Holocaust. The Jewish World Almanac has been regarded as the absolute most authentic and trustworthy source for the world's Jewish population numbers and according to the World Almanac, the world population of Jews increased between 1933 and 1948 from 15,315,000 to 15,753,000. The Nuremberg trials were held in the German city of Nuremberg from 1945 to 1949. The National Socialist leaders were arrested and placed on trial for alleged war crimes. In the courtroom was four judges, one each from The US, Britain, France, and The Soviet Union. The Nuremberg prosecutors, Kepner, Rapp, Niederman, all were Jews. In a letter to his wife, Nuremberg's chief prosecutor Thomas J. Dodd wrote that the prosecution team was 75% Jewish. The general prosecutor for the High Court was Doctor. Jacob Meissner, a Jew. According to Louis Marchalko, a wartime Hungarian journalist who wrote about the trials, out of 3,000 people employed on the staff at the Nuremberg Courts, 2,400 were Jews. The Holocaust narrative is used to take away focus from the war crimes committed by Stalin, Roosevelt, Churchill, the Red Army, Eisenhower, and Allied forces, and instead scapegoats the National Socialists for most of the war's horrors. At the Nuremberg trials, the existence of gas chambers was not established by physical and technical evidence that is normally required in any criminal trial. Article nineteen and twenty one of the statute of the court dispensed the charge of this constraint. The alleged gas chambers were neither studied nor described. American revisionist Samuel Crowell, in his brilliant 2011 book The Gas Chamber of Sherlock Holmes, writes how the Allies presented just four German documents at the Nuremberg trials to prove that the Nazis gassed people and all of these documents were mistranslated or completely taken out of context. The National Socialists at the war crimes trials were tortured by the mostly Jewish communist and British interrogators, usually by having their testicles crushed until they would admit the holocaust. Jewish led prosecutor in the Einsatzgruppen trials publicly admitted to having witnessed torture and personally used death threats to extract confessions. Simpson Army Commission judge said, the investigators would put a black hood over the accused head and then punch him in the face with brass knuckles, kick him and beat him with rubber hoses. All but two of the Germans in the 139 cases we investigated had been kicked in the testicles beyond repair. Rudolf Huss was one of them. He was arrested and tortured and bullied into unrealistic and absurd confessions. The wrong answer would give him terrible punishments. The gassing methods that he confessed to was totally implacable. Confessions were based on torture where Huss had been broken down to the point that he could say anything to avoid having more of the treatment. Huss was later hanged so that nobody would find out the truth. Huss lied to save the lives of his wife and children. All of this have been confirmed in a book published in 1983 titled Legions of Death, which contains the recollection of British Jewish Sergeant Bernard Clarke who brags about how he tortured Huss and threatened his family to force a confession out of him. Clark even threatened to send Hus children to the Gulags in Siberia if he did not confess. The Jewish domination and control of the trials was obvious. Even the hangman for the 10 National Socialist leaders sentenced to death, Master Surgeon John C. Woods was a Jew. And the hangings took place on 10/16/1946, the Jewish holiday of Purim. In the book of Esther, the 10 sons of Haman, an enemy of the Jews, were hanged on Purim day. The executioners used a short drop instead of a neck breaking long drop. The victims thus died a longer death due to strangulation. The trapdoor was too small such that the several of the men suffered bleeding head injuries when they hit the sides of the trapdoor while falling. The bodies were cremated and scattered over a river denying the families the right of burial as a final insult. The Soviet propagandists Ilya Ehrenberg, yes, you know the Jew who encouraged the genocide and mass rape of the German women, he knew about a 6,000,000 already in November 1944, as English newspapers were announcing that Ehrenberg was going to publish a book on claimed German atrocities. He described how 6,000,000 Jews had been massacred by the Germans. Considering how it takes months to write a book, the 6,000,000 figure must have been around well before November 1944. As the Allies were about to invade Germany, Ilya Ehrenberg wrote the following in the newspaper Soviet War News published by the Soviet Embassy in London. In regions they seized, the Germans they killed all the Jews, from the old folks to infants in arms. Ask any German prisoner why his fellow countrymen annihilated 6,000,000 innocent people and he will reply quite simply, why? Because they were Jews. The claim was repeated in the same newspaper in 01/04/1945 and again on 03/15/1945. But how could Ehrenberg know that 6,000,000 Jews had been killed before even a single Allied soldier had set foot on German soil. On 04/30/1945, when Hitler died and Germany surrendered, The New York Times reported that more than 6,000,000 inmates had been liberated, not killed, in German concentration camps. In June 1945, before the Nuremberg trials began, the man who was organizing it, US chief prosecutor Robert Jackson, met three lawyers representing major influential Jewish organizations to get their input for the upcoming trial. Regarding Jewish population losses, Jackson asked them straightforward. How great were those Jewish losses? One of the Jewish lawyers responded spontaneously. 6,000,000. But how could he have known this? The truth is that the 6,000,000 figure is a symbolic religious mantra that has been repeated over 200 times in Jewish owned media throughout the last century and long before Hitler even was born and long before National Socialism even existed. Speaker 6: After the war, Soviets put that totally absurd figure. That 6,000,000 figure was basically a mantra that had been throbbing through the twentieth century right from the end of the nineteenth century when when it began. The 6,000,000 figure began as a new as a as a fundraising appeal. American Jews were fundraising on the grounds that 6,000,000 European Jews were in trouble. Right? And it started off Jews in Russia. 6,000,000 Jews in Russia are in trouble, so on and so on and so on. And then in the nineteen thirties, it became 6,000,000 Jews in Europe under threat because of Hitler and and and so on. And then finally at Nuremberg, it became in the past tense, 6,000,000 Jews have been killed. And you've got something like 200 newspaper headlines of that. It's extraordinary the way that way that Mantric number, which never in any sense at any point counted. Okay? It's important to appreciate that nobody counted 6,000,000 or in any way looked as if they had counted 6,000,000 at Nuremberg at a Nuremberg trial after the war. Alright? It was just that figure that had been pulsing as a mantra through newspaper headlines, 6,000,000 Jews in Europe. Speaker 0: In this book, the first Holocaust, the surprising origin of the 6,000,000 Figure, Don Hettysheimer illustrates that the 6,000,000 figure actually dates back to Jewish fundraising campaigns that started in the end of nineteenth century and reached its peak in the mid-1920s. During almost a hundred years, Jews spread the rumor that 6,000,000 of Jews in Europe were suffering and sometimes going so far as that 6,000,000 Jews had died already. The Jewish owned New York Times was the main vehicle for the propaganda, which even include well known buzzwords like extermination and holocaust. After the Sinus Balfour Declaration was signed, the Jews claimed that 6,000,000 Jews in Europe were under threat from extermination unless they got a homeland in Palestine. This was fourteen years before the National Socialists came to power, and twenty four years before the alleged Holocaust started. The origin of this figure of 6,000,000 is not based on any kind of factual knowledge regarding Jewish population losses, it is purely a fictional, symbolic, esoteric and mystical number. Written in the Jewish Torah was a prophecy that the Jews would be allowed to return to Israel minus 6,000,000 of their people. You shall return minus 6,000,000. The book Dogma of Judaism describes how the 6,000,000 number is kabbalistically derived. The number 6,000,000 is a symbolic number with a religious meaning and the Holocaust is part of the religious dogma of Judaism. Benjamin Blech confirmed this reality in his own book, The Secrets of Hebrew Words. The actual Holocaust stories comes from two sources: the captured high officials of the National Socialist Party that were coerced and tortured during the Nuremberg trials, and the actual Jewish survivors that came out of those concentration camps. These Jewish testaments ranged from gassings, Jew eating bears and eagles in cages, vaporizing 20,000 Jews near Auschwitz with atomic energy, torturing and killing Jewish prisoners to the tempo of a specially composed Tango of Death, steaming Jews to death like lobsters at Treblinka, electrocuting them to death, musical camp dogs ripping Jews who played false in the orchestras to death, homosexuals being tickled to death, gazers of Jewish blood, Jews being made into lampshades and soap, carts on rails that threw Jews into the ovens directly, Nazi masturbation machines and yeah, additional testaments that were given are just as ludicrous. One Speaker 8: thing Speaker 28: that I'll never forget that I heard, and he said, the Nazis are taking our our young Jewish infants, and they're tearing them in half by their legs, and they're throwing them in the nester. The nester is a river. So they said, for every person that's gonna take their lives, they're gonna torture to death five of us. Then they punished us for every man that ran to the wire. They they took a 100 inmates, and they killed them in front of everybody. Speaker 21: This is greatest love story we've ever told on Speaker 29: this show. Oh, okay. This is Speaker 30: Herman Rosenblatt received international attention for his story about being a hungry little boy in a Nazi concentration camp who was thrown apples every day by a little girl on the other side of the fence. Years later, according to the story, Rosenblatt met that same girl on a blind date in New York City, and he proposed on the spot. Speaker 21: I used to come by every day, bring the apple, have Speaker 9: in my jacket and a Speaker 21: piece of bread, and he used to say, I'll see you tomorrow. Speaker 30: The story landed Herman and Roma Rosenblatt on Oprah twice and in newspapers all over the world. They also got a book and movie deal, but the story wasn't true. Why did you do it? Why did you tell such a big lie to so many people for so long? Speaker 10: It wasn't a lie. It was I it was my imagination. And in my imagination, in my mind, I believed it. Even now, I believe it, that she was there, and she threw the apple to me. Speaker 30: How can you say it wasn't a lie? It it wasn't true, and and you know it's not true. Speaker 10: Yes. It's not true. But in my imagination, it was true. Speaker 30: Members of his own family say his real motivation was money. Herman and Roma Rosenblatt told their false story publicly for more than a decade, but it all fell apart about six weeks ago after Holocaust scholars proved that it was physically impossible for prisoners to approach the fence at the concentration camp where Herman was kept and that Roma's family was actually more than 200 miles away at the time. Rosenblatt is remarkably unrepentant about his years Speaker 10: of lying. I pronounce my love for you forever. Speaker 30: When you look at that, does it make you uncomfortable at all? No. You think that was the right thing to do? Yeah. And and and while you were up Speaker 0: on the stage there with all Speaker 7: these people, in the back Speaker 30: of your mind, you not thinking I'm not telling the truth here. No. So if you had to do it over again, would you tell the same story? Yeah. You would? Yes. I Speaker 21: simply don't know what to say. I mean, it's his imagination, but he knows it's not true. Speaker 8: He said he made up Speaker 30: a he made up a fantasy world, and he was living in that fantasy world. Speaker 21: And his son says, tried to stop him. Speaker 30: Yes. Speaker 21: Good heavens. Okay. Thank you, Dan. Speaker 0: Mitig Grocer towards Sweden talking to children, telling them of the horrors of the German concentration camps. It turned out that his story was directly plagiarized from a fictional book called Mila 18 from 1961. Josef Hurt from Pennsylvania gave public speeches for years where he claimed to have escaped from Auschwitz and even met evil Nazi doctor Josef Mengele. Had now confessed that he had fabricated the entire story. He admitted that everything was a lie. Hurt had even tattooed a fake prison number on his arm to make people believe in his lies. Otto Utkinant had for years been paid shekels to lecture in German schools about his experiences of the Holocaust. He has talked about the Crystal Knight, how he lost 72 relatives including mother, father and sister and how he himself was interned at Buchenwald. However, Otto now admits that the whole story was a lie. Misha DeFonsheka wrote a best selling memoir about her experience of the Holocaust. Her story was published almost twenty years ago as A Memoir of the Holocaust Years. The book describes how when she was six, her Jewish parents were taken from their home by the Nazis and how she set off across Belgium and Germany and Poland to find them on foot, living on stolen scraps of food until she was adopted by a pack of wolves. She also claimed to have shot a Nazi soldier in self defense. The story became a huge bestseller and was even made into a film in France. But in 2008 it was found to be fabricated and everything was a lie. The author whose real name was found to be Monica de Valle said that, it is not the true reality, but it's my reality. There are times when I find it difficult to differentiate between reality and, my inner world. Michelle will now have to pay back the money she was awarded, which amounts to $22,500,000 Elie Wiesel has told us for fifty years that while at Auschwitz he was tattooed on his left arm the number A7713. He also adds that his father was given the number A7712. But a real Auschwitz survivor, Miklos Gruner claims that Elie Wiesel is an impostor. Miklos who actually was at the camp claims that Elie Wiesel stole the identity of a real man named Lazar Wiesel who the number 87713 actually belonged to. First of all, if you look at his arms, Elie Wiesel does not have a tattoo. The number A7712 actually was given to a man named Abraham Wiesel, Lazar's older brother. Eli Wiesel never claimed that he saw any homicidal gas chambers, instead he claims that he witnessed evil Germans throwing Jewish babies in gigantic flames sleeping up from a ditch. But this has also been debunked by scientists, historians and engineers. Auschwitz was built on a swamp with a high water table which made it impossible for bodies to have been burned in ditches. Not to mention that it was impossible for human bodies to be totally consumed by flames in this manner because of lack of oxygen. Miklos however says that he never saw any ditches where children were burning. Eli Wiesel explains that some events do take place but are not true. Others are, although they never occurred. In 1986, Miklos Gruner met Eli Wiesel in Stockholm. Miklos thought that he was going to meet Lazar Wiesel. But after the meeting, Miklos said, I was stunned to see a man I did not recognize at all. He was not my fellow prisoner. Miklos also was surprised that Eli couldn't speak Hungarian, but spoke English with a strong French accent, even though Huizel claims that he was born in Hungary. Neither Eli Huizel nor his father Shlomo Huizel are named in any records from Auschwitz or Buchenwald. After the war, Elie Wiesel joined the Jewish terrorist group Irgun. Anyway, Elie Wiesel is today laughing all the way to the bank as his best selling book, Night, brought him international recognition at millions of dollars. He even won the Nobel Peace Prize in 1986. Out of thousands of real Jewish survivors from the German camps, the international Jewish community handpicked Zionist and hate filled liars to spread anti German propaganda. But of course, not all Jews are lying. Many Jews don't agree with the Holocaust narrative, and many of them testified that they never saw any mass murders or gassings. But these Jews have effectively been silenced by anti free speech, signist organizations to cover up the truth. Paul Rasinia was arrested by the Gestapo in October 1943 and deported to Germany, where he was held prisoner until the end of the war in Buchenwald and Dora Concentration camps. Rassinier was upset by the many lies and myths about the concentration camps that were being circulated. French resistance members who also were interned in various German concentration camps during the war including Auschwitz and other alleged death camps, they all gave accounts of their treatment by the Germans and they all denied any knowledge of gas chambers and a mass murder program in the camps. Rasinior said that never at any moment did the responsible authorities of the Third Reich intend to order or in fact order the extermination of the Jews in this or any other manner. Maria van Herwarden testified about her camp experience in a Toronto District Court in March 1988. She testified that she witnessed the deaths of many fellow inmates by disease and particularly typhus and she saw some take their own lives, but she saw no evidence at all of mass killings, gassings or of any extermination program. The Jew Benedict Kochsky, who spent the years from 1938 to 1945 in concentration camps, three of these in Auschwitz, said: I was in the big concentration camps in Germany. I must truthfully state that in no camp have I ever seen anything that might have resembled gas chambers. A Jewish woman named Marika Frank arrived at Auschwitz Birkenau from Hungary in July 1944, when 25,000 Jews were supposedly gassed and cremated daily according to the official story. She testified after the war that she heard and saw nothing of gas chambers during the time she was interned there. Jewish writer Gerrard Menounin says, the Holocaust is the biggest lie in history. Germany has no blame for the II World War. That Jewish pressure has inflicted laws on democratic societies to prevent questions and incessant promotion and indoctrination of the same advertently inconsistable Holocaust proves it must be a lie. Why else would no one be allowed to question it? Jewish professor Norman Fiegelstein says, the Holocaust proved to be the perfect weapon for deflecting criticism of Israel. The Holocaust may yet turn out to be the greatest robbery in the history of mankind. Jewish sheep rabbi Aria Friedman says the Holocaust is a successful historical fiction. Jewish professor Roger de Margo said Speaker 31: I know that the plot, for instance, of the Holocaust is a complete fake because it's very easy to know, because it's a simple technical arithmetic problem which could be solved by a child in high school. Now any chemist know that you can't gas people with cyanide acid. Let's call it that in English: hydrogenic acid. Hydrocyanic Hydrocyanic acid. 1,000 or 2,000 people at the time, it's well known and even the most important American Jewish newspapers, the American Jewish Yearbook, said that there was 3,003,000 Jews in occupied Europe in 1942. So I don't see how they could have killed 6,000,000 Jews when there was only three millions. You know, they alright. So I think anybody can see that. I enlisted in 1944. Speaker 30: I see. Speaker 31: I enlisted for three years, 1944. It was in the war. The war finished in 1945, but I was in the army in 1944 because, of course, as everybody did, I believe that Hitler was the real monster that everybody said he was. But since I have studied what happened in Nazism, under Nazism, what Hitler did want to do and said when you read these books. Well, maybe anybody can read Mein Kampfel can read the myth of the twentieth century by Rosenberg. And anybody can know also what happened these last fifty years when Hetler I absolutely had nothing to do and not the slightest influence because Nazi has been dead now for fifty years. So you can do what happened. And what happens, I told you in my in my lecture, is absolutely incredible. And at the top of everything, you can see the Jews. I told you, I studied the books which really expresses Nazism, that is to say, Mein Kampf and the myth of the twentieth century by Rosenberg. I studied what happened during the war, and especially what Hitler actually did, which is hidden, which is concealed to us. What what he did in Germany is and the only know thing we know about Hitler is that he killed 6,000,000 Jews who never existed in gas chambers, which nobody ever saw. That's all that's the only thing which people know about it. When you really know what he did, what he actually did in Germany, when you have studied all that, you see that you have been completely completely misled, to use a mild term. Speaker 0: Stephen F. Pinter, who served as a lawyer for the United States War Department and the occupation forces in Germany and Austria for six years after the war, made a following statement. I was in Dachau for seventeen months after the war as a US department attorney and can state that there was no gas chamber in Dachau, nor was there a gas chamber at any of the other concentration camps in Germany. Speaker 32: I challenge your history again. There is absolutely no record that 6,000,000 people were put in concentration camps. They only have 16,000,000 to begin with. Speaker 33: But in spite of Jewish opposition to historical integrity, holocaust revisionists are breaking the bars erected around their imprisonment of conscience and speaking out. Robert Farasson, for instance, a recognized French specialist in document analysis has stated that no document has been found that proves that a plan for Jewish extermination by the third Reich was ever contemplated. Expulsion, yes, but extermination, no. As punishment for challenging the official holocaust line, Farson has been repeatedly the victim of physical assault, countless legal actions, freezings of his bank account, and heavy fines. In the year 2000, Swiss scholar Jurgen Groff, author of the book The Holocaust Swindle, after receiving a two year jail sentence for allegedly questioning the existence of gas chambers in Auschwitz, fled to Saint Petersburg where he's been living ever since as an exile. There in Saint Petersburg, Groff is engaged in examining Soviet archives which Groff claims when allowed for release will bring Jewry's official version of the holocaust to its knees. Particularly scandalous and a blow to free speech and historical inquiry is the arrest of German lawyer Horst Muller. In 2009, Muller was sentenced by two German courts to eleven years in prison total for opinion crimes, one of them being Muller's assertion that the official version of the holocaust is the greatest lie ever perpetrated in human history. Speaker 0: The benefits of exegregating the Holocaust have been enormous to sinus Jews both financially and politically. The Holocaust is today used as a guilt weapon as many racial groups exploit the empathy that white Europeans are known to have in order to guilt trip them into a collective guilt by making whites feel shameful and guilty about their past. Speaker 22: Absolutely. We need to Speaker 21: play on that guilt. Speaker 28: I bring up everything from Speaker 5: the past. Speaker 29: Fifty years. If Speaker 8: the Speaker 0: left, communists, or Jews hear a person discussing anything related to immigration, demographics, or race realism, they immediately label that person as a neo Nazi, the next Hitler, or antisemitic. This is done to shut down the conversation and to make the person look like a hateful bigot. Really quite dangerous, racist, fascist rhetoric. People don't think that it's okay to be a fucking Nazi anymore. Speaker 7: It's basically the same as quoting Hitler. Speaker 34: There's a bunch of opportunistic hate mongering fascists trying to garner sympathy with garbage propaganda videos. I directly compared everyone who talked about cultural Marxists to the fascist literal Nazis who invented the term. Speaker 7: Racism is especially sensitive against individuals who are murdered in the millions. Speaker 35: Very racist and antisemitic things. This This is kind of embarrassing, but this hits somewhat close to home since some of my family aligns with that way of thinking. They don't think that it happened. Just gonna erase all that history. It sounds like my grandpa or any other racist person. Don't blame the Jews. This is literally my grandpa. Speaker 7: Of course, she doesn't even believe that the holocaust even fucking happened. Well, mean, he did kill, like, 6,000,000 fucking Jews. I mean, believe it or not, he also killed 6,000,000 fucking Jews. Listen, you fucking cow. Okay? When you kill 6,000,000 Jews, it doesn't matter what you did in the past. Speaker 36: Holocaust. Yeah. Yeah. We're gonna talk to Mercedes Carrera. Speaker 0: 6,000,000. Speaker 31: 6,000,000. Speaker 36: When I was a punk rocker when I was a punk rocker brother 6,000,000. Were 6,000,000. Was 6,000,000. Speaker 0: The Holocaust narrative is used to strengthen Jewish identity simultaneously as undermining, demonizing, and delegitimizing white European identity. It is used as a manipulative weapon against all white Europeans. Speaker 29: I have done my research. Shane. Speaker 8: I have Speaker 29: done my research. Shane. Shane. You're fucking a white male. Yes. In America. Shane. Yes. Look at all the fucking Shane. People that are Mexicans. Now, you owe me some money. Okay? You owe me reparations. Why is that? Speaker 37: Because every freedom that I have and have taken for granted for my entire life has been made possible by wealth that my ancestors stole. Speaker 29: The Speaker 0: Holocaust narrative is primarily used to discourage policies such as nationalism and instead promote globalism and multiculturalism in the West world. Europeans are constantly reminded of never forget, never again and that the horrors will never be repeated. This is done to brainwash the Europeans to not stand up for their own nation and race. Through this narrative, the Europeans support the politics that protect the rights of minority groups instead of their own people. Any criticism against the Jews or the Jewish State Of Israel had practically been outlawed. The Jewish Holocaust turning to a religion in which no deviation from the Orthodoxy is acceptable. Even if there have been many Holocausts and greater genocides throughout history, the Jewish Holocaust is the only one that counts and it is of course the only one of whose orthodoxy is criminalized to even question. In fact, it is the only historical event that is prohibited by law to even question in many countries. The reason why you probably never even have heard about this research that have proven the official story to be false, is because researchers who have dared to explore the many inconsistencies and contradictions of the holocaust story have been subjected to physical attacks including harassment, vandalism, career destruction, drive by shootings, physical assaults and even firebombings of the warehouse that holds their work. Jewish and Zionist anti free speech organizations are doing everything they can to suppress the truth through censoring the Internet and burning the books that expose their lies. Thanks to the pressure from anti free speech organizations, Facebook, YouTube and other social media are doing their best to repress and silence the truth and we cannot even rely on these platforms to be used in the future. Wikipedia and Google is both monitored to fit the politically correct narrative to mislead the population. Speaker 36: Moet Zetyesha, in conjunction with My Israel, has arranged instruction day for wiki editors. The goal of the day is to teach people how to edit in Wikipedia, which is the number one source of information today in the world. As a way of example, if someone searches the Gaza flotilla, we wanna be there. We wanna be the the guys who influence what is written there, how it's written, and to ensure that it's balanced and Zionist in nature. Speaker 38: I came here to learn more about how we, as Israelis and as Jews, can defend Israel online on the Internet, and particularly in Wikipedia in this case. Wikipedia is a bit of a complex system, and it's sometimes hard to figure out the rules. I personally tried to edit things in Wikipedia that were against Israel. Knowledge is important for anyone who wants to be active in defending Israel on the Internet so that we can go and we can see the information and we can say this isn't quite right. It's showing one side of the story, and I can I have the the power and the right to change that? And in general, it's so important for us to be online working to defend our ourselves and to prove to to the world and to ourselves that we are just and we are right. And because right now, if you look online, if you do searches for certain terms related to Israel, it's just it's just filled with antisemitism, anti Zionism, and garbage. And there's not enough of us out there working to counteract that and make sure that the other side of the story, our side of the story, and our right side of the story is getting the right coverage and the coverage that it needs. Speaker 0: In our supposedly free and democratic countries that frequently pride themselves of being tolerant, third world invaders are now raping European women and receive the most lenient sentence. Meanwhile, Holocaust deniers or anti Semites can get many years in prison for merely questioning a historical event. It is clear that our governments are not working for our people anymore. According to Gerhard Menonin, there were 117,344 accusations of thought crimes in the German courts in the year nineteen ninety four to two thousand and four. Around 2,000 people are put on trial every year for Holocaust denial, which can give up to five years in prison and a fine. Speaker 15: Most of the people in England, America, Australia have no idea what a tyranny this country is. Speaker 17: Hundreds, we have more than 2,000 process, more than 2,000 trials a year and that over more than ten years. So you can imagine how many people have suffered from it and families have been destroyed and they lost their job and so on and so on. That they said the truth. Speaker 21: And simply for inquiring, simply for inquiring into They the sources for are not promoting any ideas, they are simply asking questions like you do. Speaker 17: Yes, and now what happened in Paris is just for us because all the heads of the nation said press free and meaning freedom is the greatest thing for democracy. And therefore I say I use this freedom. Speaker 0: The Holocaust is a story that the globalists don't allow to even be debated or questioned. Anyone who questions the story immediately is branded as a racist, a Nazi who wants to kill 6,000,000 Jews and a Holocaust denier, hater or anti Semite. This labeling technique is used to discourage discourse in discussions related to Holocaust and World War two. Holocaust revisionism is today considered a taboo matter with laws and prison sentences applied to Europeans who questions the politically correct Holocaust narrative. This is a gross infringement on article 19 in the United Nations declaration of human rights. Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression. This right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive, and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers. The mere fact that Holocaust denial laws in Europe exists should raise an eyebrow. Truth does not fear investigation. You certainly do not need to make up laws to protect history unless you are trying to protect a lie. The truth stands on its own legs. Speaker 20: At that time, my whole family's wiped out. Speaker 39: Yes, Yes, The Holocaust is big business because, Germany so far has given the Jews, I think, at least $200,000,000,000. So it's big business, and some of you are still getting a thousand dollars a month. And a lot of people don't know this. And then people don't realize who brought the slaves to America. They were Jewish ships.

@xGHOSTx990 - Alé (Lord/Majesty) ✝️

@badazn Fake German holocaust was always wartime propaganda

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

“Let’s debunk Majdanek on one photograph. There’s the windows….” -Cory Hughes https://t.co/ITP6jZ2DRE

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 discusses Mydonic and presents a debunking claim in one photograph, specifically referencing "the windows" and the claim that Zyklon Bee was thrown in through the windows from outside to gas people. The speaker asserts this is a false narrative and characterizes it as a supposed wartime propaganda story that has grown into history over time. The speaker says: "the story with Mydonic is that they act... opened the windows and they threw the Zyklon Bee in the windows from outside" to gas people, and comments that the idea is absurd and that no one would knock the window out while being gassed. The speaker notes that this is the supposed explanation and that, in context, it becomes obvious it was wartime propaganda that has over time grown into history. The speaker then shifts to the broader implications, noting that people all over Europe can go to jail just for having this conversation today, potentially facing years in prison. They anticipate backlash against doing the show. The speaker asserts that history needs to be rewritten, stating that the people who perpetuate this story are "enemies of humanity." They argue that when you lie about history, you "steal people's essence from them," and claim that "there should be there's no punishment too great for that." In sum, the speaker contends that the Mydonic anecdote about Zyklon B being thrown through windows is a wartime propaganda narrative, not credible history, and emphasizes the consequences and penalties of challenging or discussing such histories in Europe. They express a conviction that history should be rewritten to correct what they view as deceptive or harmful representations, while acknowledging potential social or legal repercussions for discussing these topics publicly.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: German engineering. Okay. So then Mydonic Mydonic, you get through real quick. Here's let's debunk Mydonic in one photograph. There's the windows. Okay? And so the story with Mydonic is that they act I'm I'm not even making this up. That they opened the windows and they threw the Zyklon Bee in the windows from outside. That's how they allegedly gasping people. Oh my god. It's just it's so you're supposed to just sit and believe this and not question it. Right. Someone's not just gonna knock the window out as we're getting gas. It's just so absurd. That was Yeah. That was the story. Yes. And so to when you put all that in context, it becomes obvious. It was wartime propaganda that has over time grown into history. Mhmm. And like you said, people all over Europe can go to jail just for having this conversation today. Like, years in prison. Right. I'm sure there'll be some kind of blowback on doing the show in general. Yeah. Oh, well. This is part of history that needs to be rewritten. It does. The people who perpetuate this story are enemies of humanity. Ultimately, when you lie about history, you take you steal people's essence from them and there should be there's no punishment too great for that.

@xGHOSTx990 - Alé (Lord/Majesty) ✝️

@badazn The alleged gases the jews suffered from the”holocaust” 🤣

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

“For many decades it was alleged that Jews were killed using carbon monoxide and a diesel engine in Treblinka, but people realized that diesel engines don’t produce enough carbon monoxide to kill you.” -Cory Hughes https://t.co/7Itacp1H0B

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker challenges the historical narrative around Nazi extermination methods by asserting several counterclaims about the evidence and the revisions of the story over time. They claim that the carbon monoxide used at Treblinka allegedly came from a diesel engine, but argue that diesel engines do not produce enough carbon monoxide to kill people, implying that the story had to be changed. They note that Yad Vashem discussed this in 2019, but contend that the debunking of the diesel-engine theory occurred in the 1980s, and that the Nitzkor project responded by stating it was “just a 500 BHP engine from a captured Soviet tank,” accusing others of moving the goalposts whenever caught. The speaker then shifts to Zyklon B, asserting that it “was not meant to kill people, it was meant to kill bugs and keep the prisoners healthy and alive because they needed them,” portraying the chemical as primarily a pest-control agent rather than a genocide tool. Turning to Auschwitz, the speaker references a sympathetic photograph, then discusses propaganda about the number of victims. They state, “originally, the propaganda about Auschwitz was that five point five million were killed at Auschwitz,” and clarify that when they refer to Auschwitz, they are not talking about Birkenau but the initial Auschwitz gas chamber. Overall, the speaker presents a pattern of alleged revision and reinterpretation of Nazi-era facts, arguing that the narrative shifts whenever it is challenged, and contrasting widely cited figures and purposes with claimed alternative explanations. The emphasis throughout is on questioning the established account of how mass murder was carried out at Treblinka and Auschwitz and on attributing changes in the historical narrative to deliberate adjustments rather than new evidence.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You know. So the carbon monoxide that they used at Treblinka allegedly at Treblinka for many many decades, it was alleged they used a diesel engine. Right? But people realize that diesel engines don't produce enough carbon monoxide in order to kill you. They'll make it because they had to change the story. They had to change the story and that's exactly what they did. But see, this Yad Vashem was talking about this in 2019, but the debunking of the diesel engines happened like in the eighties. And so here we have the Nitzkor project who gave the response to the debunking of the diesel engines and said to know that it was just a 500 BHP engine from a captured Soviet tank. Right? It's moving the goalpost forever. Yeah. Every time they get caught, they just change and add something different. Right. The Zyklon b, you know, I've already talked about the Zyklon b, it was not meant to kill people, it was meant to kill bugs and keep the prisoners healthy and alive because they needed them. Right? Alright. So Auschwitz, this is what a what a sympathetic photograph this looks like. Mhmm. Alright. So originally, the propaganda about Auschwitz was that five point five million were killed at Auschwitz. And when they say Auschwitz here, they're not talking about Birkenau. They're talking about the initial Auschwitz gas chamber

@xGHOSTx990 - Alé (Lord/Majesty) ✝️

@badazn Cracking the enigma code reveals the fabrication of the German holocaust Fact: it also allowed for the political jews in America influence the president to let Japan attack pearl harbor

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

David Irving talks about the British codebreakers reading the German secret messages of the Commander of Auschwitz: “…he says there is no reference to any gassings the majority of the deaths were caused by epidemics and by illness…” https://t.co/jRIRESs0az

Video Transcript AI Summary
We must revise our histories of the Second World War to incorporate the enormous element played by British code breaking, which also has a vital part in the Auschwitz story. One of the codes we were breaking were the secret codes of the commandant of Auschwitz. The top secret messages the commandant of Auschwitz sent back to Berlin every night, reporting what he had been doing in the previous twenty-four hours, were being read by us. Sometimes we read them before Oswald Pohl, his superior in Berlin, read them. This gave us exact knowledge of what was happening in Auschwitz. The British official historian, Professor Frank Hinsley, who is the master of St John’s College in Cambridge, writes in volume two of the history of the British Secret Service and in a special appendix devoted to these decoded police signals, SS signals, that there is no reference to any gassings. The majority of the deaths were caused by epidemics and by illness. This claim is there in his writing, and it is suggested that historians should look for it. Yet is anybody smearing Hinsley's name? Is anybody banning him from Germany or Austria or Italy or South Africa? No, because he’s not out there campaigning. He’s not campaigning for real history. He’s written it, and the speaker respects his judgment. Hinsley decided to preserve your reputation, go to Cambridge, become master of St John’s College, write the book, and let the real fighters go out there and do the fighting. And that is what the speaker is doing.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Now, of course, we've all had to revise our versions of the history of the second world war to include the enormous element played by British code breaking. And British code breaking incidentally plays a vital part in the Auschwitz story because one of the codes we were breaking were the secret codes of the commandant of Auschwitz. The top secret messages with the commandant of Auschwitz sent back to Berlin every night reporting what he'd been doing in the previous twenty four hours. We were reading it. Sometimes we've read it before Oswald Pohl, his superior in Berlin read it. So we knew exactly what was happening in Auschwitz. And the British official historian, professor Frank Hinsley, who's present the master of St John's College in Cambridge, he writes in volume two of the history of the British Secret Service and a special appendix devoted to these decoded police signals, SS signals, he says there is no reference to any gassings. The majority of the deaths were caused by epidemics and by illness. It's there. If only the historians look for it. Yet is anybody smearing Hinsley's name? Is anybody banning him from Germany or Austria or Italy or South Africa? No. Because he's not out there campaigning. He's not campaigning for real history. He's written it, and I respect his judgment. He decided preserve your reputation. Go to Cambridge, become masters in John's College, write the book, and let the real fighters go out there and do the fighting. And that's what I'm doing.

@xGHOSTx990 - Alé (Lord/Majesty) ✝️

@badazn Lets go swimming in the 1930s

@xGHOSTx990 - Alé (Lord/Majesty) ✝️

@badazn Facts against the fake holocaust

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Points against the “Holocaust.” -Nuremberg was a show trial -None of the major Historical figures books at the times mention mass gassings -The allies broke the German enigma code and no discussion of a “Holocaust” exist. -no official order from Hitler. -No mention in Goebbels diaries -no chemical evidence on the so called “gas chambers” of mass gassings. -no mass graves -Plenty of incentive to continue the lie since Germany and the west are still paying reparations today….

@xGHOSTx990 - Alé (Lord/Majesty) ✝️

@badazn Rare pictures of the “holocaust” Clearly displays how degenerate some of the j3ws were

@DerWulf - WULF

How bad was it in Auschwitz? https://t.co/hp3PZeKMGj

@xGHOSTx990 - Alé (Lord/Majesty) ✝️

@badazn Why did the j3ws embed the fake holocaust narrative into American k-12 classes? To brainwash, deceit, subvert history to the advantage

@GoUncensored - Uncensored.AI

Why did the McGraw Hill textbooks lie to us about World War 2? https://t.co/dfisWLjTOr

@xGHOSTx990 - Alé (Lord/Majesty) ✝️

@badazn J3ws turned the holocaust narrative denial ILLEGAL in many countries’s justice systems

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

🚨 ‼️ Very Important fact! The Chemist Germar Rudolf, whose scientific report proved that the “gas Chambers” at Auschwitz did not exhibit chemical evidence of mass Gassings, was prosecuted for legal speech he made in America. In other words, if you deny the official Holocaust story in America, and if you travel to Germany, you can be prosecuted there for legal speech you made here. Be careful where you travel, and be cautious of the Twitter location update. X will have to follow the laws of the country it operates in…

Video Transcript AI Summary
Michael Chernoff says: I’m very fortunate to have the First Amendment here and different laws, like, I mean, you Michael Chernoff stepped over your rights and sent you back. The Germans arrested me, of course they were waiting for me. I had to serve my initial fourteen months then. They put me on trial again for books I had published while I was in England and the United States where this was a completely legal operation. So they prosecuted me for activities that are done in countries where it was legal. And the reasoning is, well, everything is accessible over the Internet. If somebody can read it in Germany, it’s a crime. So they demand jurisdiction over the entire globe as soon as something is—or the entire universe, if you want. The other person replies: Technically, I wonder if I could be arrested if I went to Germany. Yes. It’s crazy. Michael Chernoff: And have keep all that stuff when I travel now. The other person: Yeah. Don’t do it. Because your profile is high enough for them to bother. Michael Chernoff: That that I could literally be arrested for going to Europe now. Yeah. I’m sorry. Sorry. That just hit my mind, but go on. The other person: So we’ll put on trial for, actually, the pros give me for $9, every single one with up to five years. You do the math.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And, you know, America, I'm very fortunate to have the first amendment here in different laws and, like, I mean, you Michael Chernoff stepped over your rights and sent you back. But Speaker 1: The Germans arrested me. Of course, they were waiting for me. I had to serve my initial fourteen months then. They put Speaker 0: me You hadn't served the first fourteen months. Speaker 1: Right. Because I'd run. Mhmm. Right? And then, they put me on trial again for books I had published while I was in England slash in The United States where this was a completely legal operation. So they pros me prosecuted me for activities that are done in countries where it was legal. And the reasoning is, well, everything is accessible over the Internet. If somebody can read it in Germany, it's a crime. So they demand jurisdiction over the entire globe as soon as something is or the entire universe, if you want. Speaker 0: Technically, I wonder if I could be arrested if I went to Germany. Yes. It's crazy. Speaker 1: And have keep all Speaker 0: that stuff when I travel now. Speaker 1: Yeah. Don't do it. Because your profile is high enough for them to bother. Speaker 0: That that I could literally be arrested for going to Europe now. Yeah. I'm sorry. Sorry. That just hit my mind, but go go on. That's just, like, shocking. Yeah. Speaker 1: So we'll put on trial for, actually, the the pros give me for $9, every single one with up to five years. You do the math.

@xGHOSTx990 - Alé (Lord/Majesty) ✝️

@badazn J3wish holocaust denial laws

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

On Holocaust Denial Laws… Jake Shields- “They say you can have a defense, but you can’t bring any real defense, because they call a real defense Holocaust denial.” Germar Rudolf- “I never was allowed to take a stand as a witness. German judges are required by case law to systematically deny motions that contain that kind of evidence.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 describes a judge threatening a witness with prosecution for testifying to their best knowledge and skills, saying that would make the witness criminally liable; asserts that such a threat by a judge constitutes a felony. Speaker 1 adds that many countries (27) have strict limits on defenses, often labeling real defenses as holocaust denial, preventing witnesses that counter official narratives and effectively blocking a proper defense; calls the situation insane. Speaker 0 reflects on lessons as an expert witness: he was never allowed to take a stand and was always moved off the stand. He states that German judges are obligated by case law to systematically deny any motion to introduce that kind of evidence, and that threats accompany this denial. Speaker 1 responds, though the exact wording is unclear. Speaker 0 recounts events from the early 1990s, noting that repeated appearances as a witness prompted panic and the introduction of new case law. He describes an incident where, in 1996, a defense lawyer wanted him to testify again, and the defense lawyer was prosecuted for merely filing a motion to introduce the evidence. He explains that in Germany, the defense cannot introduce evidence; only the prosecution and the judges can introduce evidence. The defense is defenseless because a defendant must file a motion for the judge to introduce evidence, and the judge not only systematically denies it but the prosecution prosecutes the defense lawyer for filing the motion. This pattern is described as serious and as something upheld by the German Supreme Court. Since then, filing motions to defend oneself in historical matters is described as a crime, with the act of defending oneself seemingly criminalized.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Be prosecuted for it. Used, and briefly summarizing what I would be testifying about and how my testimony would kinda look like. And then the presiding judge asked me whether I would really testify, in these terms because if I planned on doing that, I would be violating the law and I would be criminally liable and could be prosecuted for it. That is a judge threatening a witness with prosecution if it testifies to his best knowledge and skills. That is threatening a witness is a felony, but they are the judge doing it. Speaker 1: I think this is extremely important for everyone to think about for a second because I think, what, 19 countries illegal? They don't 27. Yeah. 27. My god. And in most of these places, they will not let you they say you can have a defense, but you can't bring a real defense because they call any real defense holocaust denial. So, like, you can't bring in witnesses that go against what their narrative is, and you can't even prevent a proper defense. This is absolute insanity. Speaker 0: That that is the the lessons I first the first lesson I learned was as an expert witness. I never was allowed to take a stand as a witness. They always took me down. What I learned is that German, judges are obligated by case law to systematically deny any motion to introduce that kind of evidence. And with underhanded threats like I just Speaker 1: told Put you put the Speaker 0: That was in the early nineteen nineties Because I kept coming and kept appearing as a witness, so they kind of panicked, they introduced new case law. In one in one case, a a defense lawyer wanted to have me testify again in '96, and then they prosecuted the defense lawyer for having just filed a motion to introduce the evidence. Now in Germany, the defense can't even introduce evidence. In Germany, only the prosecution and the judges can introduce evidence. The defense is defenseless by Prince William or penal crimes. For defending their clients. So the defendant has to file a motion for the judge to introduce it for them. The judge not only systematically denies it, but then the prosecution decides to prosecute the defense lawyer for just filing a motion. This is pretty serious. Gets convicted. It's upheld by the supreme court in Germany. And ever since, filing motions to defend yourself in these historical matters is a crime. Defending yourself is

@xGHOSTx990 - Alé (Lord/Majesty) ✝️

@badazn ✡️s war against Germans and their propaganda started well before WW1 & WW2

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Jake Shields- “Is it true newspapers used the term Holocaust and the number 6 million many many times before WW2?” Germar Rudolf- “Yes the New York Times was using the term Holocaust during the time of Tsarist Russia, before WW1.” https://t.co/dZnVGMxwR7

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: 6,000,000 number used lot many times before World War two by, like, newspapers. Is that true? I've seen that mentioned quite a bit with that being used. Speaker 1: If you wanna read up all on this, it's volume six of the Holocaust Hangposts here. It's the first Holocaust. Talks about all the many times that, particularly, New York Times was good at it, as I call it, the New York Times because it's owned and run by Jews. They were propagating the 6,000,000 number, and they were using first, the term Holocaust already during the czarist time in Russia before the first world war. 6,000,000 Jews are threatened. 6,000,000 Jews are dying. They're threatened by a holocaust. It goes into the first world war after the first world war with the Bolshevik revolution, the New York Times, the Jewish community in The United States to a large degree supporting the Bolshevist revolution, which was mainly a a Jewish supported revolution. Speaker 0: And Speaker 1: then you if that revolution collapses, the Jews are facing countrywide pogroms that would potentially wipe them out. So they knew it's either the the Bolshevik, revolution succeeds or we're gonna have a holocaust. And they were talking about that, in this context. When you support the Jews, 6,000,000 are about to die and so forth. It goes on. There is a straight line going from the eighteen eighties into the second world war Killing final five. 6,000,000 Jews are dying or threatened or being killed. So it's nothing new. The area, Russia, Poland, Germany has changed. The the villain, the czar, the white anti Bolshevik civil war people, or then Hitler and his acronies. Speaker 0: So what you’re saying is that— Speaker 1: So the ingredients to the story have changed, but not the story in general.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: 6,000,000 number used lot many, many times before World War two by, like, newspapers. Is that true? I've seen that mentioned quite a bit with that being used. Speaker 1: If you wanna read up all on this, it's volume six of the Holocaust Hangposts here. It's the first Holocaust. Talks about all the many times that, particularly, New York Times was good at it, as I call it, the New York Times because it's owned and run by Jews. They were propagating the 6,000,000 number, and they were using first, the term Holocaust already during the czarist time in Russia before the first world war. 6,000,000 Jews are threatened. 6,000,000 Jews are dying. They're threatened by a holocaust. It goes into the first world war after the first world war with the Bolshevik revolution, the New York Times, the Jewish community in The United States to a large degree supporting the Bolshevist revolution, which was mainly a a Jewish supported revolution. Speaker 0: And Speaker 1: then you if that revolution collapses, the Jews are facing countrywide pogroms that would potentially wipe them out. So they knew it's either the the Bolshevik, revolution succeeds or we're gonna have a holocaust. And they were talking about that, in this context. When you support the Jews, 6,000,000 are about to die and so forth. It goes on. There is a straight line going from the eighteen eighties into the second world war Killing final five. 6,000,000 Jews are dying or threatened or being killed. So it's nothing new. The area, Russia, Poland, Germany has changed. The the villain, the czar, the white anti Bolshevik civil war people, or then Hitler and his acronies. So the ingredients to the story have changed, but not the story in general.

@xGHOSTx990 - Alé (Lord/Majesty) ✝️

@badazn Examined bodies and gas murders never happened

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Dr Charles Larson performed over 1k autopsies in German Concentration camps after the end of the War. Not one victim was documented as killed by “gassing.” Not one. https://t.co/mXiYDXsH9S

@xGHOSTx990 - Alé (Lord/Majesty) ✝️

@badazn ✡️s sensationalism and exaggeration through propaganda and their fake survival stories

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Here are some disinfection chambers from Dachau…. Where they would use Zyklon b to gas the prisoners clothing and to prevent the spread of infection… Why would you delouse the clothing if you were just gonna kill them all?? 🧐 This was the real use of Zkylon B by the way, and matches up with the actual amounts ordered and the chemical evidence within the walls of various concentration camps…

@xGHOSTx990 - Alé (Lord/Majesty) ✝️

@badazn Work camps had doctors and health check ups Highlights of the fake ✡️ holocaust ✡️s are psychological and deceivers

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

“If you actually look at some of the best documents from the Auschwitz camp, you can see huge efforts to save everyone’s life by improving hygienic conditions, building massive hospital complexes, and you even see the records of how they were (medically) treated.” -Germar Rudolf https://t.co/EGvINFnI0I

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: In the best documented cases, the Auschwitz Camp, vast documentation shows how these order of save everyone's life is being implemented with huge efforts of improving sanitary hygienic conditions, building massive hospital complex complexes that treat inmates, and then you see the records of how they were treated, how all these people, these inmates unable to work. Mhmm. That's the cliche. If you're unfit for work and more than two weeks you get killed. You see the records of all these inmates, tens of thousands of them, being unable to work, being kept in hospitals, being fed, being cured, and until they are fit again and they get released. It's lot of work. Massive amount of investment in most modern medicine of the time with x-ray investigations and surgeries and lab tests all over the place. Tens of hundreds of thousands of document proving that. And you look even in the financial side in today's dollars, almost a quarter billion dollars of money invested in order to get a medical facility going that is On Auschwitz? In Auschwitz. In order for for the entire region, for every inmate that in the the greater part of of Poland and what is East Germany, all inmates who get sick and can't be treated in in the other camps get sent to Auschwitz into this massive hospital camp facility to get proper treatment. Mhmm. You look at the the technology they use. We don't know about Zyklon b saying it's being used to save Yeah. Their They're using Zyklon b to do To kill lives. So Zyklon B is sent there to save lives, but what I'm getting at is to what 1944, Zyklon B kind of phases out because we have new technologies. DDT from today's perspective, unfortunately, but it worked better, and microwave delousing facilities.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And, if you actually look in in the best documented cases, the Auschwitz Camp, vast documentation showing how these order of save everyone's life is being implemented with huge efforts of improving sanitary hygienic conditions, building massive hospital complex complexes that treat inmates, and then you see the records of how they were treated, how all these people, these inmates unable to work. Mhmm. That's the cliche. If you're unfit for work and more than two weeks you get killed. You see the records of all these inmates, tens of thousands of them, being unable to work, being kept in hospitals, being fed, being cured, and until they are fit again and they get released. It's lot of work. Massive amount of investment in most modern medicine of the time with x-ray investigations and surgeries and lab tests all over the place. Tens of hundreds of thousands of document proving that. And you look even in the financial side in today's dollars, almost a quarter billion dollars of money invested in order to get a medical facility going that is On Auschwitz? In Auschwitz. In order for for the entire region, for every inmate that in the the greater part of of of Poland and what is East Germany, all inmates who get sick and can't be treated in in the other camps get sent to Auschwitz into this massive hospital camp facility to get proper treatment. Mhmm. You look at the the technology they use. We don't know about Zyklon b saying it's being used to save Yeah. Their They're using Zyklon b to do To kill lives. So Zyklon B is sent there to save lives, but what I'm getting at is to what 1944, Zyklon B kind of phases out because we have new technologies. DDT from today's perspective, unfortunately, but it worked better, and microwave delousing facilities.

@xGHOSTx990 - Alé (Lord/Majesty) ✝️

@badazn The fake Holocaust exaggerations that have fooled Christian Americans for decades now

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Outrageous murder methods initially claimed during the Holocaust, but later proven false… - death by steam - death by vacuum - death by chlorine - death by engine exhaust - death by electrocution - death by delayed action numbing gas - death bridges - murder by defecation Jake Shields- “That doesn’t seem like a very practical way to kill people.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss the history of reported murder methods at Holocaust sites, emphasizing that much of what was claimed during the war and immediately after is now considered false or unsubstantiated. They note that Treblinka is a focal point for what they describe as witness testimony chaos and ideas that “anything goes” in early claims, not just for Treblinka but as a pattern across camps. Speaker 1 lists a variety of methods that were claimed at the time: death by steam; death by a vacuum (pumping air out of a chamber to suffocate); chlorine; engine exhaust gas claims; electrocution; killing with a delayed-action poison gas that would numb people who could still walk to mass graves and fall over them; mass gas chambers on a track where victims would roll over mass graves and be deposed through opening floors; a death bridge where people climbed onto a scaffold and were shot to death. He also mentions Belzec, where there were claims that people were murdered by defecation pits, with other Jews made to defecate on them until suffocation. Speaker 0 comments that these descriptions do not seem practical as methods of killing. He reiterates Treblinka as a major example of “testimoniel anarchism” and “whatever you can come up with” in the wartime and immediate postwar period. He observes that the narrative that exists today is completely different from that chaotic testimony. Speaker 1 notes further varieties, including chlorinated lime in trains that would kill people, and asserts that there are many such ideas that were invented when discussing homicidal gas chambers in encyclopedias. He mentions a chart showing “what was claimed once and what is still there?” as a reference to dropped death claims. He asks how the narrative moved from the chaotic, testimonial stage to the streamlined version presented today, in which Treblinka’s victims are said to have been killed with diesel engine exhaust. He adds that diesel exhaust is “technically impossible” because mainstream historians now acknowledge that diesel does not contain enough carbon monoxide to kill in the way claimed, implying that the diesel claim could not have been the mechanism. Overall, the speakers describe a shift from a wide array of war-and-postwar claims about murder methods at camps to a different, more uniform narrative, and they question how that transition occurred, especially regarding Treblinka and the claim of diesel exhaust.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We've talked about a lot of the Holocaust. This is a long in-depth, you know, subject. We probably talked about ten hours, but we'll go another twenty, thirty minutes. What's completely invented? We talked about exaggerations, but there's lots of things that are completely false too. Speaker 1: Yeah. Let's stick to the stuff that the mainstream has actually accepted to be completely false. Speaker 0: Say the gas chambers because we obviously think that's false. Speaker 1: But Let's start on the level what the mainstream actually accepts. If we look at the murder methods that were claimed during the war and right after the war for one of the most iconic camps, and I'm not even talking about Auschwitz here, the most glaring example of, I would say, witness anarchy of anything goes and everything being invented and claimed is the Treblinka Camp. The methods claimed there during the war mainly were death by steam. Steam. But there were a lot of claims about death with a vacuum. So just pumping the air out of the chamber and suffocating people that way. Mhmm. With chlorine, there were also engine exhaust gas claims, but then they had electrocution. Killing with a delayed action, poison gas that would just numb people, and then they could still walk by themselves conveniently to the mass graves and fall over there, or mass gas chambers that were on on a track, and they could roll over mass graves and depose their load with opening floors into them. Death bridge with people who had to climb up on a on a scaffold and were then shot and fall to the death. In Belzec, they had a claim that people were murdered by shit. Jesus. They had to lay down in a in a a defecation pit, and other Jews had to shit on them until they suffocate. Speaker 0: That doesn't seem very practical way to kill people. Speaker 1: So if we look at Treblinka, and that was one of our bells, I I wanted to mention it because as I mentioned, it's It's it's Whatever you can come up with, anything goes. That was all coming up during and after the war. And the narrative we find today is something completely different. So where did all the the chlorine, the vacuum, the steam, the electrocution, the death bridges Where did it Speaker 0: go? No one's talking about it. They wanna bury it. Speaker 1: They had that chlorinated lime in in in trains that would kill people, all kinds of things. You'll find them all, invented when you're talking about homicidal gas chambers in the encyclopedia. It has a section about death claims that have been dropped, and I have a chart about it. Shows it. What was claimed once and what is still there? How did we get from this complete chaos, the testimonial anarchy, to the streamlined narrative that we're told today in Treblinka, people people were killed with diesel engine exhaust, which, by the way, is technically impossible because even the mainstream historians have now explained and recognized that diesel does not have enough carbon monoxide in the exhaust to kill the way it is claimed. Can't have been diesel. But there was the narrative for decades now. How did

@xGHOSTx990 - Alé (Lord/Majesty) ✝️

@badazn Jewish construct: inflation through numbers

@jakeshieldsajj - Jake Shields

Germar Rudolf discusses how concentration camps are constantly changing the number killed and always in the same direction https://t.co/W7tPQ5F6gZ

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 explains that the narrative about these camps was submitted by the Soviets in conjunction with the newly established Stalinist, communist Polish authorities. He highlights Majdanek as the most extreme case of the Soviets rigging their record, noting that it was the first of the major camps conquered by the Red Army. After the Red Army captured Majdanek, Soviet authorities claimed that two million people were killed there and in seven homicidal gas chambers. He emphasizes that in the documentation, each of these facilities is described as either a drying facility, a fumigation chamber, or something similar, with no trace of homicidal gas chambers. He then cites a 2005 assessment by a new historian at the Auschwitz Museum, who made what he calls the ultimate drop down to seventy-eight thousand victims and reduced five of the seven homicidal gas chambers. From the initial figure of two million, the estimated victims are now down to seventy-eight thousand, which he notes is less than 4% of the original number.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Narrative about these camps was, of course, submitted by the Soviets in conjunction with the newly established Stalinist, communist, Polish authorities. The most extreme case of the Soviets rigging their record and recognized as such by mainstream historian is the Majdanek camp, which most listeners won't even know. It's a it's a now a completely minor camp, but it was the first one of the big camps that was conquered by the Red Army. So they conquered it, and they claimed right away two million people were killed here and in in seven homicidal gas chambers. With every single one of them, the documents show either it was a drying facility, it was a fumigation chamber, or something to that effect. It there's no trace in the documentation about homicidal gas chambers. In 2005, the new, historian of the Auschwitz Museum makes the, so far, ultimate drop down to seventy eight thousand victims, drops five of the seven homicidal gas chambers. So we start with two million, we're down to seventy eight thousand. That's less than 4% of the original.

@xGHOSTx990 - Alé (Lord/Majesty) ✝️

@badazn No “final solution” order ever existed

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

“Heinrich Himmler read about the propaganda that “Nazis we’re turning Jews into soap” and he issued an order to his underlings, when a Jew dies nothing is to happen with that body except burial or cremation.” -Germar Rudolf https://t.co/1l4lDsZsIN

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses claims about the Nazi regime’s treatment of Jewish bodies in death. They recount that Himmler, outraged by propaganda about soap, issued an order that under no circumstances could a Jewish body be used for anything other than burial or cremation. The point is made that this instruction was a top-down directive, and that the dead were to be treated with strict reverence, with no body parts to be repurposed. The speaker notes that these statements run counter to the well-known rumors about using Jewish bodies to manufacture soap, lampshades, or other products. The implication is that such sensational claims were not permitted to occur, as an official prohibition was in place. The claim is that there was an SS investigation into a Buchenwald commander for alleged misdeeds related to the treatment of inmates, including extreme abuses that would implicate illegal activities with bodies or embezzlement and murder. It is stated that the Buchenwald commander was executed, but not for the alleged attempts to turn inmates’ bodies into soap or other items. Instead, the commander was executed for killing inmates who were whistleblowers and for embezzlement, while the speakers maintain that this was supposed to be in line with mainstream Nazi policy to turn Jews into soap and similar acts. The speaker emphasizes that the order was from the top down, forbidding such activities, and that those who violated it would be prosecuted mercilessly and executed. The narrative then asserts that the policy or order to stop such practices was halted by the end of the war, as many cases could not be prosecuted any longer. In sum, the speaker presents a picture of an official prohibition against the desecration or exploitation of dead bodies, contrasted with sensational rumors, and notes that prosecutions could not be pursued to completion as the war ended.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Got stuck with the soap when Visa was making his propaganda about the soap. Himmler read about that. Bad big bad Himmler who is supposed to have run all these deportations, camps, and extermination operations, the head of the SS, Heinrich Schimmler. And he instantly issued an order to his underlings that we know all that Jews are dying under the circumstances they have to live in the camps and so forth. Whenever there is a Jewish body, nothing else is allowed to happen with that body but either burial or cremation. Really? So it goes in order out. Don't mess with any dead person. You don't are not allowed to use any body part for anything. They need to be buried or burned. That goes against soap. That goes against lampshade. That goes against frunk and head. That goes against anything. It was cleared from top down, and there was actually a criminal investigation by the SS itself in against the Buchenwald commander who was suspected to have done like that during the war. Really? And they actually executed that commander for infractions. They couldn't prove lampshades or anything. They could prove that he had embezzled large funds, and they were suspecting and were on on this hot on pursuit to to show that he actually killed inmates who were whistleblowers, and then eventually was executed. He was executed for Right. For killing inmates who have to do actually mainstream Nazi policy to turn Jews into soap and sharpen their heads and whatever. No. He it was the order from top down, it's forbidden, and we're gonna prosecute everyone who does it anyway mercilessly, and you're gonna get executed. That's so interesting. Self cleansing. It was stopped cold by the end of the war because a lot of these cases couldn't be prosecuted anymore. They were pending, and then, of course, at the end of the war, nothing was possible anymore.

@xGHOSTx990 - Alé (Lord/Majesty) ✝️

@badazn Every jewish senior is a survivor 🤣🤣🤣🤡🌎✡️👺

@NoahsArk1000 - Noah’s Ark 🚢

They never stop talking about it, do they? https://t.co/2cFdOr3IXu

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 discusses a hostage situation involving 50 people, specifying that among the hostages are Holocaust survivors as well as grandmothers and their grandchildren. The speaker then asks, “Who takes hostage grandmothers?” highlighting the unusual image of grandmothers being taken hostage and incidentally noting that, “they always for some odd reason, like, no matter what year it is, there's always Holocaust survivors.” The speaker comments on the longevity of these individuals, remarking, “You guys notice that, bro? Like, every Jewish grandma is a fucking Holocaust survivor, bro. I'm still trying to figure out how these niggas live so long.” The statement continues with the assertion, “Like, goddamn. Niggas knew Hitler personally.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: 50 people hostage. And those included Holocaust survivors, grandmothers, grandmothers, their grandchildren. Who takes hostage grandmothers? You know what's interesting, bro? They always for some odd reason, like, no matter what year it is, there's always Holocaust survivors. You guys notice that, bro? Like, every Jewish grandma is a fucking Holocaust survivor, bro. I'm still trying to figure out how these niggas live so long. Like, goddamn. Niggas knew Hitler personally.

@xGHOSTx990 - Alé (Lord/Majesty) ✝️

@badazn Jews sent their own to the work camps to steal their wealth to begin a zionist political plan to create the terrorist state of Israel

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

The jews sent their own to the camps. Ben Gurion made a deal with Eichmann. jews needed money. Germany needed workers. Ben Gurion stole the wealth of thousands of Hungarian jews and put them on the train. Then used it to build the biblical nation state of Israel. https://t.co/GYQVjmJ5kX

@xGHOSTx990 - Alé (Lord/Majesty) ✝️

@badazn Work camp deaths had a paper trail

@NoahsArk1000 - Noah’s Ark 🚢

Rare Clip 🚨 Is it true that ‘in Auschwitz, when there was a natural death, you had more than 20 signatures from doctors and all that’? https://t.co/AjsbCzBeyq

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 explains that the Germans recorded everything at Auschwitz: for a natural death there were more than 20 signatures from doctors and officials, and for a non-natural death (suicide, execution, etc.) there were more than 30 signatures. He mentions the "Totten Grusher" death registers of Auschwitz. He asks, do you know where they are? In Moscow. Since 1945, those registers have not been published. He argues that if the real figures of the dead were added, it would be impossible to believe that 4,000,000 died in Auschwitz as inscribed on the monument, or 1,000,000 as some say, or 700,000 as others claim. He emphasizes that proof is needed for everything and expresses bewilderment that more than forty years after the event, people are “swallowing everything.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Because you must know that the Germans took notice of everything. Do you know that in Auschwitz, when there was one natural death, you had more than 20 signatures from doctors and all that. When it was a non natural death, suicide, execution, etcetera, you had more than 30 signatures. And the Totten Grusher The death registers. Death registers of Auschwitz. Do you know where they are? In Moscow. Why since 1945, why those registers have not been published? Because if you add the real figures of the dead people, it would be impossible to believe that 4,000,000 died in Auschwitz like it inscribed on the monument or 1,000,000, like says, or 700,000 as another another one says, etcetera, etcetera. You must understand that we need for everything, we need proof. I don't understand that forty more than forty years after the world, people are like that, swallowing everything.

@xGHOSTx990 - Alé (Lord/Majesty) ✝️

@badazn Hitler refused to use gas The gas chambers are a fabrication and a lie created by jews

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

“Isn’t it ironic, that the guy who is most famous for gassing people (Hitler) refused to use poison gas that would have won the war for him?” -Dan Bilzerian https://t.co/u62cmjtlqe

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 argues that it’s logistically absurd to claim the Holocaust involved gassing millions and hauling bodies from so-called gas chambers, noting the inefficiency of that method. He points out the irony that the person most famous for gassing people refused to use gas that could have won the war, because he would not be the first to use gas, despite having 20,000 kilograms of tabun and sarin. He asserts there were no counters to that chemical weapon, yet the decision not to use gas led to the downfall of his country. Speaker 1 adds that Hitler was gassed himself at the end of World War I, which blinded him. During the fall of the Kaiser’s empire, the Reich’s collapse and the emergence of Bolshevik and Weimar structures occurred as some German states did not join the Weimar Republic and became sub-states or Soviet-like entities. Speaker 0 emphasizes that anyone uncertain about Hitler’s legacy should read Mein Kampf and hear from Hitler’s own words to understand why he held his beliefs. He claims Hitler did not begin as an anti-Semite intent on killing Jews, and describes Hitler as someone who admired and observed the universe, was a truth-seeker from day one, engaged in political discussions, and was fascinated by philosophy, German history, the British Empire, and America. He notes Hitler was well-read and well-spoken, but deprived economically, working as a day laborer with little work available to feed himself. He claims Hitler went days without food to afford a book, showing a love of knowledge, and that he wasn’t a failed artist; he was a talented artist whose path could have been architecture rather than drawing. Speaker 0 contends that smear campaigns against Hitler fail and are “nonsense.” He dismisses more extreme claims as false, such as insults about Hitler’s sexuality or anatomy, and mentions that such accusations are common against many figures. Speaker 1 comments that a lot of the negative rumors about Hitler (e.g., perverse claims) are typical allegations made against many people, implying they are not unique to Hitler.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And and I think a common thing with the Holocaust that people don't think about is, like, how logistically ridiculous it would be to gas 6,000,000 or 4,000,000 people and then have to, like, haul those bodies out of a, you know, a shower that was a supposed gas chamber. Like, the logistics of that are so ridiculous. People don't stop and think about that. Like, how inefficient of a way that would be to kill people. And then they also don't talk about the fact that it's a it would be a little bit ironic that the guy that's the most famous for gassing people refused to use the gas that would have won the war for him because he had, like, what was it, 20,000 kilograms of of taboon and sarin where, like, he he could have absolutely stopped Normandy in his tracks. We didn't have any counters to that. They invented this nerve gas, and he refused to use it to his death and his country's, you know, like, the fall of his country. Right? He was so against gas that He was willing to die and let his country fall so as not to violate, you know, the the the the agreement that he had that he would not be the first to use gas. I just find that a little ironic. Speaker 1: A lot of that is because he was gassed himself at the end of the first war. He was he was gassed. Speaker 0: I know. Speaker 1: And it actually blinded him. And during the fall of the the Kaiser's empire, the Kaiser's Reich, which then started the the Bolshevik and Weimar Republics, because some of the German states didn't become part of the Weimar Republic. They actually became, like, communist Soviets. They became, like, substates. And while that was going on, he was blinded, and he was in a hospital. And it's really important, I think, that anyone that is iffy about the legacy of Adolf Hitler or about the kind of man that he was, they should read Mein Kampf, and they should hear from his own words as to why he had the beliefs that he had. And he didn't start his journey being this anti Semite that wants to kill all the Jews and, like, that's not that's not the story of Adolf Hitler. The story of Adolf Hitler is someone who I admire, someone that deeply observed the universe before making a judgment. He was a truth seeker from day one. He engaged in political discussions with anyone that he could. He was fascinated by, you know, philosophy. He was fascinated by German history. He was fascinated by the the British and, you know, the British Empire, you know, and America. And, you know, he was a very well read and well spoken young man who, by the nature of of, you know, the the poor economic circumstances, he was impoverished. And he was he was fundamentally a a day laborer in slavery fighting for his daily bread, working one or two days a week because there was just not enough laboring to go go around to feed himself. And he talks about in Mein Kampf going days without food so that he could afford a book, so he could read a book because he had that much of a of a a love of knowledge. And he wasn't a failed artist. He was such a good artist in his particular style. He was encouraged to become an architect and not a, you know, kind of creative drawer. So it's like two different drawing pathways. And so all the smear campaigns against Adolf Hitler, they all fall flat on their face. They're all nonsense. Like and then there's obviously the more retarded ones like, oh, he had one testicle. He raped his knees. He was on Speaker 0: a a dick they're saying. Yes. Now they're saying a small dick. Yeah. You know, Speaker 1: which they say about anyone.

@xGHOSTx990 - Alé (Lord/Majesty) ✝️

@badazn Hitler never utilized gases at his disposal

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

“Hitler had the power to gas millions with Tabun & Sarin—but refused.” -David Irving Why? (For educational/historical/discussion purposes only.) https://t.co/6UxoiCvKST

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses Adolf Hitler and poison gases, noting that Hitler possessed two nerve gases, Tabun and Sarin, against which none of the Allies had any defense. Despite this, Hitler ordered that these poison gases not be used because Germany had signed the Geneva Convention. The speaker asserts there are contradictions here that historians should have investigated, claiming to have spent thirty years in archives and even offering rewards for any evidence, yet suggesting that if such evidence exists, others would have found it. The argument pivots to the expectation of traceable chain-of-command documentation. The speaker points out the many people involved in the process—from the individual writing the teletype message on one end to the recipient at the other end, with twenty copies at each end—and argues that even if official files were destroyed, someone would have written home or kept a diary. The speaker asserts that such evidence should be in the records because Hitler’s other crimes are documented in various forms. Specific documented crimes and orders attributed to Hitler are listed: - Euthanasia: an actual order with Hitler’s signature, issued sometime in 1940 but backdated to the first day of the war, with Hitler’s euthanasia order in the files with the Signicharlotter. - The order to kill the Russian commissars after the campaign in Russia began, with those commissars described as political officers attached to the Russian armed forces; the order is documented in the military files of the day. - The order to kill British commandos, noted as a particularly sore point for Canadians, with Hitler’s order from October 1942 in the files, described as a criminal order and adequately documented. - The order to kill the male population of Stalingrad after capturing the city, recorded in the private diary of General Helder (Haldbr). - The order to Linzalla Airmen in May 1944, also attributed to Hitler, and documented. The speaker then raises an interesting question about Hitler’s character: how could he unhesitatingly issue orders that are crimes under international law, such as the order to kill prisoners, while at the same time ordering that poison gas not be used to avoid violating the Geneva Convention? The speaker notes that poison gas could have potentially changed the course of the war—specifically, around the Normandy Beachhead in July 1944, when it was established and near breakout—arguing that use of nerve gases against which Allied troops had no gas masks could have wiped out the entire Normandy Beachhead. The speaker contends that Hitler could have won the war by pulling out the Panzer divisions and redeploying them to the Eastern Front, potentially mopping up the Eastern Front in two to three months, but He did not.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The Adolf Hitler who we told we're told is such a mass criminal, he had in his hands two poison gases, Tabun, t a b u n, and Sarin, s a r I n. These are nerve gases against which none of the allies had any defense. Yet Hitler ordered that these poison gases not to be used because Germany had signed the Geneva Convention. We're up against contradictions here which historians should long ago have investigated. Believe me, in thirty years working in the archives, even if I find it, somebody else would have found one line of evidence. And I've offered rewards, thousand times, for anyone who can find one line of evidence. And you expect that in the chain of command from, say, Hitler or Himmler, right down to the man who is actually pulling the lever, there would be so many people involved, like the guy who's this diamond who writes out the teletype message at one end, and the guy who receives it at the other end, and there are 20 copies at each end, and then even if all those messages are destroyed in the official files, somebody's gonna be writing home to his mother saying, we've been doing something awful. I I can't tell you what it is. There's gonna be some shred of paper. Somebody's writing a diary, doctor Goebbels or Hans Frank or someone, and they can't find it. And it should be there because all Hitler's other crimes are there. Euthanasia. There's his actual order with his signature on it. It was issued sometime in the 1940, but he backdated it to the first day of the war. Hit Hitler's euthanasia order is in the files with the Signicharlotter. The order to kill the Russian commissars after the campaign in Russia began, the the commissars, which were the kind of political officers attached to the Russian armed forces. Hitler ordered their order to be liquidated, and that order is documentaries in the military files of the day. His order to kill British commandos, which of course is a particularly sore point for Canadians. That hitter order of October 1942 is in the files. It's a criminal order and is per adequately documented. His order for killing of the male population of Stalingrad succeeded in capturing Stalingrad. That is recorded in the private diary of General Helder, h a l d b r. So all these other Hitler the order to Linzalla Airmen in May 1944. That was also a Hitler order, that's also there. This raises the interesting question. What kind of character was Hitler that he would unhesitatingly issue orders which are are crimes under international law, like the order to kill prisons. And yet he ordered that on no account was poison gas to be used because it would convicted of the G Convention. Although he could undoubtedly upturned, for example, the course of the Normandy battle. At the time the Normandy Beachhead had been established in July 1944, and it was about to break the allied horse about to break out, who could have wiped out the entire Normandy Beachhead using the nerve gases against which we had no gas masks. He could have won the war. He could have pulled out the panzer division, sent them back to the Eastern Front, mopped up the Eastern Front in in two months, three months, and won the war. But he didn't.

@xGHOSTx990 - Alé (Lord/Majesty) ✝️

@badazn Lets add x rays to ensure no broken bones in the work camps Jews are allergic to physical labor and work in general. Their wealth is earned by unnatural and exploitative methods https://t.co/VhkzroEfeQ

@xGHOSTx990 - Alé (Lord/Majesty) ✝️

@badazn Treblinka Jews cover their fake non existent dead jews with cement so no one ever discovers the truth

@ShieldsClips - Fight Back Podcast

"There's no dead jews buried in Treblinka" https://t.co/2YftEQdMuB

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 asserts that the Treblinka massacre is a fraud and that there are no dead Jews buried at Treblinka. They claim that while Auschwitz is often debunked, Treblinka has been neglected in discussion, and that Jews have “recreated the Treblink [Treblinka] myth,” now saying that the victims were buried at Treblinka Two. According to Speaker 0, when intelligence bodies attempted to verify the grave, ground-penetrating radar was used to locate a mass grave of 975 Jews, but the area showed ground that has “never been disturbed,” with density consistent with thousands of years of undisturbed soil. They further claim that in response, the Jews constructed a Holocaust memorial at the site called Treblinka Two, where large amounts of concrete and rocks were poured and placed over the ground. This, Speaker 0 notes, was done so that future ground-penetrating radar studies could not be performed, effectively preventing further investigation. They describe the memorial construction as a deliberate disruption of the site in order to block scientific verification. The overall narrative presented by Speaker 0 is that the historical understanding of Treblinka is manipulated, with a shift from a buried mass grave to an alternative interpretation tied to Treblinka Two, and that subsequent memorialization has physically altered the site to thwart investigative methods. The speaker emphasizes the denial of the Treblinka burial site’s existence and portrays memorial efforts as a means to obstruct verification.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Is a complete fraud, and there's there's no dead Jews buried at Treblinka. They they can't find any, and apparently 975,000. You know, people talk about Auschwitz a lot, which is obviously very easy to debunk, but people skip over Treblinka, and the Jews have now recreated the Treblink Treblinka myth, and they're now saying that, no, they weren't buried at Treblinka, they were buried at Treblinka two. And so then when some intelligence bodies crossed. Yeah. Exactly. So then they did the ground penetrating radar to try and find this mass grave of 975 Jews, and it turns out the ground has never been disturbed in that area ever. The density is consistent with thousands of years of an an disrupted ground. And so then what the Jews did was they built a holocaust memorial at so called Treblinka Two, where they just poured like tons and tons of concrete and put tons and tons of rocks all over the ground, so you can never do that study again. You can never do the ground penetrating radar because they've disrupted the site as a part of their their, you know, memorial.

@xGHOSTx990 - Alé (Lord/Majesty) ✝️

@badazn Rockwell and holocaust number

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

George Lincoln Rockwell speaks about Hitler, jewish math calculations and Mein Kampf. For educational/historical/discussion purposes only. https://t.co/TAGBX5FfRY

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker argues that the claim of six million Jews is unfounded and inconsistent with historical numbers. He notes that the “6,000,000 Jews” claim would require crediting Jews for having nine lives, since “these Jewish gas Jews show up again and again and again all over the world,” not only in the speaker’s country. He states that the Jewish Encyclopedia lists, in 1932 and ’33, only two and a half million Jews in the entire area where Hitler could have been, including Russia, and he asks how Hitler could be accused of gassing six million Jews in a region with only about two and a half million Jews. He contends he would be grateful if the Jews would explain this discrepancy, and he asserts they have never done so. The speaker declares that the “6,000,000 Jews” claim is “the biggest of all the big lies that has ever been told.” Turning to Mein Kampf, he notes that the book describes Jews as “the great masters of the lie” and says that their “big lie technique” is their biggest technique, describing it as “a selfie technique by which the Jews tell an enormous lie,” and stating that Hitler does not embed or advocate this, but condemns it as vile. He asserts that this big lie technique is exactly what is happening in “our country today.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Oh, what about the 6,000,000? Well, one of the easiest questions to take care of, actually, is the 6,000,000 Jews. These people, these Jews, if this were true, the 6,000,000 Jews, sorry, you would have to give the Jews credit for being more clever than the cats for having nine lives because these Jewish gas Jews show up again and again and again all over the world, not just here. The Jewish encyclopedia, which you can consult, and as you can see in all my literature, lists in 1932 and '33 only two and a half million Jews for the entire area, everywhere the Hitler possibly could have been. There were only two and a half million Jews in Russia. He was accused of gassing 6,000,000 Jews in a two and a half million Jew area. I would be very grateful if the Jews would explain this to me. They've never done it. I think it's I think the 6,000,000 Jews stuff, that's the biggest of all the big lies that has ever been told. And while we're at that subject, let me point out that in Mein Kampf, we hear forever about Hitler's big lie. If you will read and study in Mein Kampf, you look at the actual book rather than just listen to Jews like William L. Shirer telling about it, you will discover that Hipper says in Mein Kampf that the Jews are the great masters of the lie, and he says that their biggest technique is what he calls the big lie technique. And he says it's vile. He not only didn't embed it, he doesn't advocate it. He says it is a selfie technique by which the Jews tell an enormous lie, and it's so big that nobody ever suspects them. That's exactly what's going on in our country today.

@xGHOSTx990 - Alé (Lord/Majesty) ✝️

@badazn 26 million 🤣

@occultni - sLOVen

Imagine https://t.co/41nRBStJHE

@xGHOSTx990 - Alé (Lord/Majesty) ✝️

@badazn The real jew is a nomad He has nothing but destruction and wickedness

@occultni - sLOVen

https://t.co/WRvJ7l7spy

@xGHOSTx990 - Alé (Lord/Majesty) ✝️

@badazn David irving offer money for proof of a holocaust Money has NEVER been collected

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

In 1977 Historian David Irving has offered 1000 pounds to any historian, private person or institute who can find one wartime document showing that Adolf Hitler knew about anything “nasty happening to any jews” during World War II The money has never been collected to this day. https://t.co/zgQoUd08Ui

Saved - December 27, 2025 at 11:30 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A thread examining James Bacque’s Other Losses, which alleges Eisenhower deliberately caused the deaths of up to a million German POWs after WWII through starvation and exposure in Western camps. It covers claims of Disarmed Enemy Forces, absence of Red Cross aid, poor shelter and medicine, and miscounted prisoner totals. It notes a 1945 “Missing Million,” disputed ration figures, and a 1948 ICRC inquiry. Historians’ panel criticizes the book’s methods and sources. You be the judge.

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

🧵1/16. Thread based on the book “OTHER LOSSES” Other Losses is a 1989 book by James Bacque, which claims that U.S. General Dwight D. Eisenhower intentionally caused the deaths by starvation or exposure of around a million German prisoners of war held in Western internment camps after the Second World War.” For educational/historical purposes only

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

🧵2/16. “Other Losses charges German prisoners that had fled the Eastern front were designated as "Disarmed Enemy Forces" in order to avoid recognition under the Geneva Convention (1929), for the purpose of carrying out their deaths through disease or slow starvation.” https://t.co/KSkSco3hgf

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

🧵3/16. “Eisenhower’s camps along the Rhine became open-air death pens for approximately 1.5 million “disarmed German POWs” No tents, no latrines, no Red Cross parcels, just barbed wire and mud. Guard towers shot escapees on sight; starvation and dysentery finished the rest. Allies classified it TOP SECRET until the 1990s.”

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

🧵4/16. “Other Losses” cites documents in the U.S. National Archives and interviews with people who stated they witnessed the events. The book claims that a method of elimination was present in the banning of Red Cross inspectors, the returning of food aid, soldier ration policy, and policy regarding shelter building.”

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

🧵5/16. “Historians, including the former senior historian of the United States Army Center of Military History, Colonel Ernest F. Fisher, who was involved in the 1945 investigations into the allegations of misconduct by U.S. troops in Germany and who wrote the book's foreword, verified that the claims are accurate.”

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

🧵6/16. “Other Losses” contends that nearly one million German prisoners died while being held by the United States and French forces at the end of World War II. Specifically, it states: "The victims undoubtedly number over 800,000, almost certainly over 900,000 and quite likely over a million. Their deaths were knowingly caused by army officers who had sufficient resources to keep the prisoners alive."

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

🧵7/16. ‘Other Losses’ contains an analysis of a medical record that it states supports the conclusion of a prisoner death rate of 30%. Bacque also referred to a 1950 report from the German Red Cross which stated that 1.5 million former German POWs were still officially listed as missing, fate unknown.”

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

🧵8/16. “The book comments that approximately 15% of the deaths in the U.S. camps were from starvation or dehydration and that most deaths were caused by dysentery, pneumonia, or septicaemia, as a result of the unsanitary conditions and lack of medicine.” https://t.co/MqfEyhQaw4

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

🧵9/16. “The book states that Eisenhower's staff were complicit in the scheme, and that in order to carry out such a scheme, Eisenhower kept these prisoners in camps far longer than was necessary It states that, by the end of 1945, only 40% of prisoners had been released.” https://t.co/Joir1pMPOZ

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

🧵10/16. “Other Losses states that the U.S. dismantled the German welfare agencies, including the German Red Cross, then dismissed the Swiss Government from its role as Protecting Power. No agencies were allowed to visit the camps or provide any assistance to the prisoners, including delegates from ICRC (International Committee of the Red Cross), which was a violation of the Geneva Convention. It further states that the only notable protest against this was from William Lyon Mackenzie King, Prime Minister of Canada.”

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

🧵11/16. “The book states that many of the U.S. camps consisted of open fields where prisoners were forced to sleep on the ground in the open, though it claims the U.S. Army had plenty of surplus shelter supplies which could have been issued. No supplies such as blankets were supplied to the prisoners.”

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

🧵12/16. ‘The book describes that a "Missing Million" prisoners exist in the difference in totals between two U.S. army reports (the last of the daily reports and the first of the weekly reports) issued on June 2, 1945. As a consequence of this, according to Quartermaster's reports the number of rations issued to the camps was reduced by 900,000.’

Video Transcript AI Summary
Latrains or food. One former German POW, Wolfgang Yves, who still resides in Germany, reports that in his subsection of perhaps 10,000 prisoners, 30 to 40 bodies were dragged out every day. A member of the burial work party, Yves says he helped haul the dead from his cage out to the gate of the camp where the bodies were carried by wheelbarrow to several big steel garages. There, Yves and his team stripped the corpses of clothing, snapped off half of each aluminum dog tag, spread the bodies in layers of 15 to 20 with 10 shovelfuls of quick lime over each layer till they were stacked more than a yard high, placed the personal effects in a bag for the Americans, then left. Some of the corpses were dead of gangrene following frostbite. It was an unusually wet cold spring. A dozen or more other prisoners had grown too weak to cling to the log flung across the ditch for a latrine and had fallen off and drowned in the human excrement. Almighty god, please forgive America for what we have done.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Latrains or food. One former German POW, Wolfgang Yves, who still resides in Germany, reports that in his subsection of perhaps 10,000 prisoners, 30 to 40 bodies were dragged out every day. A member of the burial work party, Yves says he helped haul the dead from his cage out to the gate of the camp where the bodies were carried by wheelbarrow to several big steel garages. There, Yves and his team stripped the corpses of clothing, snapped off half of each aluminum dog tag, spread the bodies in layers of 15 to 20 with 10 shovelfuls of quick lime over each layer till they were stacked more than a yard high, placed the personal effects in a bag for the Americans, then left. Some of the corpses were dead of gangrene following frostbite. It was an unusually wet cold spring. A dozen or more other prisoners had grown too weak to cling to the log flung across the ditch for a latrine and had fallen off and drowned in the human excrement. Almighty god, please forgive America for what we have done.

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

🧵13/16. “Other Losses states that after visiting many of the camps in August 1945, Major General Robert M. Littlejohn (Quartermaster of the ETO) concluded that the U.S. Army was reporting 3.7 million prisoners while it actually possessed 5.2 million.” https://t.co/A6wIR4PTEN

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

🧵14/16. “However the book states that, three years later, in 1948 the ICRC formally requested documents confirming the total number of prisoners in the U.S. Zone and was eventually told that 3.5 million were there, which omitted approximately 1.7 million from the actual number of 5,224,000.”

@truthtroll_X - Truth Troll Official™️

🧵15/16. “A panel of eight historians gathered for a symposium in the Eisenhower Center for American Studies at the University of New Orleans from December 7–8. After the publication of the book The panel comments that, among its many problems, Other Losses: • misuses documents •misreads documents •ignores contrary evidence •employs a statistical methodology that is hopelessly compromised •made no attempt to see the evidence he has gathered in relation to the broader situation •made no attempt to perform any comparative context •puts words into the mouths of the subjects of his oral history •ignores a readily available and absolutely critical source that decisively dealt with his central accusation. You be the judge.

View Full Interactive Feed