TruthArchive.ai - Related Post Feed

TheMossadIL
Posted - May 26, 2024 at 2:36 PM
Saved - May 26, 2024 at 4:59 PM

@TheMossadIL - The Mossad: Satirical, Yet Awesome

Well, well, well. They followed the money, and look what they found! $50,000,000 in unaudited US taxpayer money in one month alone went to a pro-terrorist group disguised as a climate change organization. @SenCapito https://t.co/LQZnDlzkE3

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker raises concerns about $50 million in taxpayer money granted to the Climate Justice Alliance by the EPA. They criticize the organization's radical initiatives, including defunding the police and military, and anti-American and anti-Israel sentiments. The speaker questions if the funds will truly be used for environmental purposes or for protests. They express disappointment in the lack of oversight by the EPA and the Biden administration. The speaker plans to investigate further in the environment and public works committee.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, I wanted to bring to everybody's attention, something that doesn't get much attention. And you've heard the term follow the money. So I looked up where did follow the money. I thought it was from a Tom Cruise movie, but it wasn't. It was from Watergate. And follow the money is what they did in Watergate. And and we saw what happened. So my young staffer who's very bright, and I see him over there, Adam Pack, followed the money. And the money is from the so called inflation reduction act. So in the name of green and environmental justice, there's over $40,000,000,000 that are gonna be granted out through the EPA. So with this great research that was done, what was discovered that in December, the EPA granted $50,000,000 to an organization called Climate Justice Alliance. So we went to the website of plus of Climate Justice Alliance. This is what we found on the website that our taxpayer dollars are going to organizations such as this. This, at the bottom, is a picture of the bulldozer that went through the fence when Hamas attacked Israel in on October 7th. They have a rendering on their website. It says decolonized Palestine, and it has a picture of that same bulldozer going through that fence. If you dig deeper, they wanna defund the police, defund the military, either them or their affiliates want to want to have very radical, drastic, initiatives that I think are anti American. And they're certainly anti Israel and anti Semitic. So the Biden administration doesn't seem to care. $50,000,000 in December. Who knows how much more in the future and other like groups because there are other associated groups with this group. There's no inspector general for EPA to follow the money because they don't care. Because all they care about is the mission, the climate mission, no matter what the radical ideas that are associated with the groups. So then you could ask yourself, is this group really going to be funding climate you know, cleaning up the water and cleaning up the soil and cleaning up the air? Or are they gonna be funding things like the protests they had in heart just several weeks ago where several of them were arrested? So follow the money. We're gonna be doing that in the environment and public works committee. That's where the derivation of this was. And I I find it rather startling to me that the EPA is not doing and the administration are not doing any better research as to where our American taxpayer dollars are going.
DOGE
Posted - December 7, 2024 at 5:26 PM
Saved - December 10, 2024 at 4:45 AM

@DOGE - Department of Government Efficiency

The United States gives more in aid to foreign countries than the next 9 countries combined. Where exactly is that money going and how is it being spent? https://t.co/bNG0tGd8jc

robbystarbuck
Posted - February 1, 2025 at 7:21 AM
Saved - February 1, 2025 at 4:59 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe USAID operates as a funding mechanism for Democrats, where obscure NGOs are created, funded, and then do minimal work while benefiting activists who donate back to the party. I see it as a vehicle for spreading gender ideology and contributing to illegal immigration. The potential shutdown of USAID by President Trump has many Democrats worried, but I think it’s necessary. While there may be some positive outcomes, I feel we can’t afford to be the world's financial support when USAID seems to prioritize left-wing NGOs over genuine assistance.

@robbystarbuck - Robby Starbuck

USAID essentially functions as one of many money laundering machines for Democrats in DC. Here’s how it works: • Activists create obscure NGO • Dems fund it lavishly • NGO does bare minimum (or actively hurts the United States) • Activists get paid and donate to Dems Not only that but USAID helped spread their gender ideology nonsense and brought millions of illegals into our country. That’s why Democrats are freaking out about the possibility that USAID’s being shut down by President Trump. It needs to be done. Has anything good ever come out of USAID? Sure but we don’t have the money to be the world’s piggy bank and they’ve been an overall disaster that works harder to prop up left wing NGO’s than they do to help people. America voted to end this farce.

robbystarbuck
Posted - February 2, 2025 at 1:17 AM
Saved - February 2, 2025 at 3:17 AM

@robbystarbuck - Robby Starbuck

Annnnd the USAid website is now down. Try it: http://USAid.gov 🔥🔥🔥 https://t.co/teB9WPVe6D

elonmusk
Posted - February 3, 2025 at 3:48 AM
Saved - February 3, 2025 at 1:29 PM

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

Not anymore

@Anc_Aesthetics - Aesthetica

Why is USAID giving millions of dollars to @BillKristol ? https://t.co/wMkVwzGdi2

DecentBackup
Posted - February 3, 2025 at 5:49 AM
Saved - February 3, 2025 at 3:17 PM

@DecentBackup - BackupDecentFiJC

PRO TIP: As we all enjoy the imminent destruction of USAID, I’d just like to say one thing… I want their NAMES. All of them. Of everyone fired. Or obstructing. Or being cunty in general. Their full names. Give them to me.

@TPV_John - The Patriot Voice

.@realDonaldTrump shutting down, and doing an audit of USAID “United States Agency for International Development” using DOGE is a HUGE deal. 🚨🚨🚨 Word is that Trump is exploring the option of bringing USAID under the purview of the State Department. As it sits, USAID is the main vehicle for how our Government money launders BILLIONS UPON BILLIONS of tax payer dollars under the guise of supporting different NGOs and international humanitarian “causes”. Some of those “causes” include, but are not limited to… Funding the CIA for black projects and toppling regimes around the world, including the Color Revolution in Ukraine in 2014. Funded Bill Gates Foundation to the tune of $30 MILLION since 2012. Child sex trafficking, and other crimes against children involving our Government. USAID was also running a MASSIVE global censorship network utilizing 100s of different NGOs which are known to censor information and monitor user activity online. The purpose of this program was to put pressure on foreign governments and pass censorship bills to censor speech online. USAID played a pivotal role in funding gain of function research for COVID, and funded the Wuhan lab. To top it off, Zelensky admitted that over $177 BILLION of U.S. tax payer dollars which was supposed to go to him for the war effort in Ukraine is MISSING and he actually only received $75 Billion. He claims he has no idea where the rest of the money went. I think I have a good idea…RIGHT BACK INTO THE POCKETS OF OUR REPS & SENATORS WHO ARE SUPPORTERS OF THE WAR WITH UKRAINE. AUDIT THEM ALL IMMEDIATELY!!! The magnitude of the take down and audit of this shadow organization CANNOT be understated…This is quite literally the slush fund for the WORST offenders inside of our Government. USAID is probably the MOST CORRUPT & CRIMINAL organization operating within the confines of the Federal Government on a GLOBAL SCALE and they have been getting away with funding these horrible things, and regime changes worldwide for DECADES. @elonmusk said that USAID is a “criminal organization” and should die. I stand in FULL agreement with him on this point.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Коли я чую, що США надали Україні сотні мільярдів доларів, зокрема 177 мільярдів, хочу уточнити: ми отримали лише понад 75 мільярдів. З цих 177 або 200 мільярдів, про які говорять, ми ніколи не отримували. Це важливо, адже ми отримували не гроші, а зброю — на понад 70 мільярдів. Також були навчання, транспорт та гуманітарні програми. Тому, коли стверджують, що Україна отримала 200 мільярдів для підтримки армії, це неправда. Я не знаю, куди поділися ці гроші. --- When I hear that the U.S. has provided Ukraine with hundreds of billions, specifically 177 billion, I want to clarify: we have received only over 75 billion. Of the 177 or 200 billion mentioned, we have never received that amount. This is important because we received not money, but weapons — over 70 billion. There were also training, transport, and humanitarian programs. So, when it is claimed that Ukraine received 200 billion to support the army, that is not true. I don't know where that money went.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Дивіться, я, коли чую і раніше чув, і сьогодні ми чуємо від США, що Америка дала Україні сотні мільярдів 177, якщо сказати більш точно. Така звучала точна цифра, яку підтримувала або голосував в Конгрес тощо. Різні організації. Дивіться, я, як Президент воюючі країни, вам говорю: Ми отримали понад 75. Тобто 100 мільярдів із цих 177 або 200, говорять навіть деякі люди, ми ніколи не отримували. І це важливо. Бо ми говоримо про конкретні речі, бо ми отримували це не грошима, а зброєю. Ми зброю отримали на 70 з чимось мільярдів. Є навчання, тренування, є додатковий транспорт. Є не тільки ціну на зброю, були, а гуманітарні програми, соціальні тощо. Але коли говорять, що Україна під час війни отримала 200 мільярдів на підтримку армії тощо, це неправда. Я не знаю, де всі ці гроші.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Disinformation on social media undermines democracy, empowering authoritarianism and silencing opposition. To combat this, the CEPS countering disinformation guide offers nine key strategies and a database of interventions aimed at enhancing information integrity and societal resilience. Developed by the International Foundation for Electoral Systems, International Republican Institute, and National Democratic Institute with USAID support, the guide emphasizes a whole-of-society approach. It highlights the need for urgency in collective action, balancing resources between institutions and civil society, and employing mixed methods like fact-checking and monitoring. Additionally, it stresses the importance of establishing norms, legal frameworks, and improved social media moderation to foster a healthy information environment. Political parties should also be discouraged from engaging in disinformation. For further resources, explore the interventions database.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Disinformation has invaded online conversations on social media platforms, posing challenges to healthy information environments and threats to democracy. It bolsters authoritarians, weakens democratic voices and participation, exploits and exacerbates existing social cleavages, and silences opposition. Countering disinformation and promoting information integrity are necessary priorities for ensuring democracy can thrive. The CEPS countering disinformation guide is a resource including 9 thematic sections and a comprehensive database of interventions highlighting various approaches for advancing information integrity and strengthening societal resilience to disinformation and other harmful online campaigns. The International Foundation For Electoral Systems, International Republican Institute, and National Democratic Institute developed this guide with support from USAID through the consortium for elections and political process strengthening. Here are 9 key takeaways from the guide. Addressing disinformation requires a whole of society approach. We need to create a sense of urgency to drive collective action for addressing disinformation. Institutions and platforms have the resources to address disinformation but lack credibility, whereas civil society has the credibility but is chronically under resourced. Countering disinformation requires a mixed methods approach, including fact checking, monitoring, and other interventions. Focusing on major events like election outcomes alone will not achieve a healthy information environment. Developing norms and standards, legal and regulatory frameworks, and better social media content moderation is necessary for a healthy information ecosystem. It is important to establish frameworks to discourage political parties from engaging in disinformation. Not sure where to start? Click here to explore the interventions database of organizations, projects, and donors working to counter disinformation around the world.
Video Transcript AI Summary
USAID, or the U.S. Agency for International Development, is not an aid organization in the traditional sense. Established in the early 1960s by JFK, its purpose is to develop institutions globally that support U.S. foreign policy. USAID coordinates capacity-building efforts for activist groups in foreign countries to align with the interests of the State Department. With a budget of $50 billion, it surpasses the combined budgets of the CIA and the State Department. Essentially, USAID acts as a facilitator for the Pentagon, State Department, and intelligence community, aiding in national security and foreign policy objectives.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Department USAID and the National Down for Democracy. Now now USAID is, you know, a very no tour. It's it's sort of a switch player. There's no aid in in USAID, by the way. That's your brain is being tricked when you see the phrase USAID. It's not an aid organization. The aid in USAID stands for agent US Agency For International Development. It is developing internationally around the world all of the institutions that the state department needs to use. So when they are capacity building activist groups in a foreign country, that's because the state department wants those activists there. Now USAID for the first time in its history, it was created in the early 19 sixties by JFK 1961. It was it was created because you had all of this intelligence, statecraft, and military support and logistical aid that was tripping over it itself, basically. The military would be funding, you know, would be running aid to certain groups in the region. The state department would be running aid to certain groups in the region. The intelligence community would, and there was no way there was no sort of central coordinator of those of those capacity building operations. So USAID, by the way, is a $50,000,000,000 budget. The entirety of the intelligence community is only 72,000,000,000. So it is as more than the CIA and more than the state department. Wow. And aid is basically as USAID is effectively a switch player to to assist the Pentagon with with on the national security front, to assist the state department on the national interest front, or to assist the intelligence community on a on a sort of clandestine operations.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The US government often touts its aid through USAID, but it primarily serves as a tool for regime change. USAID collaborates with organizations like the National Endowment for Democracy to fund political groups aligned with US interests, supporting propaganda, political organizing, and sometimes violent uprisings. Samantha Power, the current head of USAID, has a history of advocating for US intervention in foreign countries, notably during the Obama administration when she supported the wars in Libya and Syria. These interventions resulted in significant costs and chaos, particularly in Libya, where the aftermath has led to human rights abuses. Much of the aid distributed is likely directed toward groups that align with US economic and political goals, rather than assisting those in genuine need.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The US government and politicians love to talk a big game about all the aid they're giving to other countries through institutions like USAID. But for a long time, the USAID has acted mainly as a regime change arm of the United States government. And they've worked hand in hand with other regime change arms like the National Endowment For Democracy to dump money and support into the US's preferred political groups, helping to fund propaganda campaigns, political organizing efforts, and at times, even violent riots or coup effort. The current head of the USAID is Samantha Power, who for her entire career has been an advocate for regime change and US involvement in other countries. She even wrote a book in 2002 titled a problem from hell where she argued that the US needs to get more involved in other countries in order to protect human rights. Then during the Obama presidency, she was one of the main people within the administration alongside Hillary Clinton and Susan Rice pushing for the wars in Libya and Syria. Both of those regime change efforts ended up being disastrous, costing the US 1,000,000 and 1,000,000 of dollars. And in Libya, toppling their government leading to an absolutely chaotic situation where slaves are now being bought and sold out in the open. That's right. The woman who pushed for that is now managing the aid that the US funnels into other countries. And you can bet most of that aid is going to the US's preferred political groups who are gonna protect their economic and political interest rather than focusing that aid on the poor and working class people who need it most.
SenJoniErnst
Posted - February 3, 2025 at 11:36 PM
Saved - February 5, 2025 at 5:50 AM

@SenJoniErnst - Joni Ernst

No more stonewalling — We need to scrutinize every last dollar spent at USAID! https://t.co/dmF9meJ4Ie

Video Transcript AI Summary
We had a productive discussion about USAID, an issue I've focused on for years in the Senate. USAID has consistently obstructed my congressional oversight efforts. I shared examples of waste within the organization during a recent conversation on X Spaces with Elon. It's crucial that we scrutinize every dollar spent there, and I'm pleased to see a shift in oversight to the State Department.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We had an excellent discussion about USAID last night, and this is an issue I have focused on for years now with my squeal work in the United States Senate. A USAID has stonewalled me at every opportunity in exercising my congressional oversight. So I gave examples of that last night on x spaces with Elon. We talked about the waste that we have found within the organization and so, yes. Do we need to scrutinize every last dollar going through there? Absolutely, we do and I'm glad to see that we're moving it to the state department.
Anc_Aesthetics
Posted - February 4, 2025 at 12:54 AM
Saved - February 5, 2025 at 3:44 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I spoke with a friend connected to the Democratic Party who expressed unprecedented panic over Trump and Elon Musk's actions regarding USAID. He described dismantling USAID as Trump's biggest political victory, as it has been crucial for Democrats' funding and influence. There's concern that Democrats might disguise partisan funding under seemingly legitimate initiatives. They could also use NGOs to reroute funds to political allies. To prevent internal sabotage, it's suggested that Trump and Musk should completely shut down USAID or overhaul its staff.

@Anc_Aesthetics - Aesthetica

Talked to a friend who has connections within the Democratic Party and he said the level of panic over Trump and Elon shutting down USAID is unlike anything he’s ever seen. By following the money DOGE has struck a killing blow to the heart of the Democrat deep state machine.

@Anc_Aesthetics - Aesthetica

Direct quote: “This is worse than 9/11 for Democrats. USAID is the primary vessel they use to achieve their political agenda. USAID is and always has been the primary source of funding for their influence peddling schemes and for their indirect sources of income”

@Anc_Aesthetics - Aesthetica

Another text “Based on the reactions from within the party it seems to me that dismantling USAID is Trump’s biggest political victory to date, it was his enemy’s golden goose”

@Anc_Aesthetics - Aesthetica

Same source who told me during the campaign (well before it was made public) that Kamala’s internal polling had her behind Trump so his information is good.

@Anc_Aesthetics - Aesthetica

Another important addition. He said initial plans by the Democrats is to have their people at USAID hide the partisan funding under “unimpeachable initiatives”. “They will push back really hard on certain line items that on their face look like reasonable USAID expenditures and hide their political spending under these programs” @elonmusk Looks like the whole thing needs to be thrown out to avoid this from happening.

@Anc_Aesthetics - Aesthetica

More: “Another likely solution for Democrats which they already use to reward VIPs is to use NGOs as an intermediary to direct funds where they want them to go” So basically USAID allocates funds for a certain initiative that looks reasonable. Democrat friendly NGO is contracted to carry out initiative. NGO #1 subcontracts “VIP” which is another NGO owned/operated by a political ally or Democrat politician. Eventually the funds reach the secret intended target and the original problem is not solved. This means they can continue to rinse and repeat this grift.

@Anc_Aesthetics - Aesthetica

“If Trump/Elon want this to stick they need to completely shut down USAID or fire the entire staff, the party has instructed their allies to not make waves and blend in. USAID is 99% Democrats they will not be able to save it without risking internal sabotage.”

SenJoniErnst
Posted - February 4, 2025 at 3:41 PM
Saved - February 5, 2025 at 6:26 AM

@SenJoniErnst - Joni Ernst

USAID did everything possible to stop me from finding out where tax dollars were going. https://t.co/NYzKGzz3yF

Video Transcript AI Summary
I have been investigating USAID's humanitarian aid expenditures related to the war in Ukraine for several years. My team faced significant obstruction and misinformation from USAID, which hindered our access to records detailing taxpayer money usage. Partnering with Representative Mike McCall, we initiated a congressional investigation, but USAID only provided limited data. Our findings revealed excessive spending by USAID with minimal data-driven results. Notably, funds were directed to the Wuhan Institute of Virology for dangerous coronaviruses, and there were expenditures for pottery classes in Morocco and tourism in Lebanon, despite State Department travel warnings.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I have been on USAID's case for years now, going back several years where I was trying to investigate the expenditures for humanitarian aid primarily when it came to the war in Ukraine. And what my team and I encountered was absolute obstruction and lies coming out of USAID. They did everything possible to stop me from accessing their records to understand where our taxpayer money was going. I eventually partnered with, representative Mike McCall in the house, and we started a formal congressional investigation. And even after that, they really pushed back, only allowed us access to a small amount of data. But what we found was extreme expenditures on the part of USAID with very little data driven results. We have seen money funded, in the Wuhan Institute of Virology through dollars steered by USAID on dangerous coronaviruses. We saw how that turned out. We've seen funding going to Morocco for pottery classes, tourism in Lebanon of all places, even when the state department was advising against travel. I could go on and on and on.
JimFergusonUK
Posted - February 5, 2025 at 7:18 AM
Saved - February 5, 2025 at 8:42 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I just shared that Trump is demanding investigations into corruption within USAID, questioning who has profited from the billions allocated. He suggests that USAID has been misused as a slush fund, raising concerns about where the money has actually gone and who benefited while taxpayers were left in the dark. There's a sense of urgency as Democrats seem anxious about the potential fallout. This effort is positioned as a broader initiative to unveil globalist corruption, signaling that a reckoning is on the horizon.

@JimFergusonUK - Jim Ferguson

🚨 BREAKING: TRUMP DEMANDS INVESTIGATIONS INTO USAID CORRUPTION – WHO'S GETTING KICKBACKS? 🚨 🇺🇸 Trump just called for full investigations into who has been profiting from the billions funneled through USAID. 🔴 For years, USAID has been a Deep State slush fund—where did all that money REALLY go? 🔴 Who got rich while American taxpayers were robbed blind? 🔴 Democrats are sweating because they KNOW the Hammer of Justice is coming. 🔥 This isn’t just about USAID—this is about exposing the globalist corruption machine. The cover-up is crumbling. The reckoning is here. 🔥

Video Transcript AI Summary
在这里，每个人都在这里。每个人都是这里的一部分。我们都是在这个地方的个体，彼此相连。 Everyone is here. Each person is part of this place. We are all individuals connected in this space.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: 的 一 个 人 在 这 里 Speaker 1: 的 一 个 人 在 这 里 的 一 个 人 都 是 在 这 里 的 一 个 人 都 是 在 这 里 的 一 Speaker 0: 个 人 的 一 个 Speaker 1: 人 都 是 在 这 里 的 一 Speaker 2: 个 人 的 一 个 人 Speaker 0: 的 人 都 Speaker 2: 是 在 这 里 的 一
robertdunlap947
Posted - February 5, 2025 at 9:11 PM
Saved - February 6, 2025 at 12:01 AM

@robertdunlap947 - Bobby D🎙

This USAID IS JUST THE TIP OF THE ICEBERG THAT IS GOING TO BE REVEALED🤬. Wait until you see what the Treasury is/was funding😡. How about WHAT THE FEDERAL RESERVE IS/WAS FUNDING😳! This is just so people can swallow ALL THE CORRUPTION THAT IS GOING TO COME OUT😤! https://t.co/V2rnblkH9t

Video Transcript AI Summary
My team faced significant obstruction from USAID while trying to access records on taxpayer money. Partnering with Representative Mike McCall, we initiated a congressional investigation, but USAID only provided limited data. Our findings revealed excessive spending with minimal results. Notably, USAID funded the Wuhan Institute of Virology for dangerous coronaviruses, and also allocated money for pottery classes in Morocco and tourism in Lebanon, despite travel warnings from the State Department. There are numerous examples of questionable expenditures.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What my team and I encountered was absolute obstruction and lies coming out of USAID. They did everything possible to stop me from accessing their records to understand where our taxpayer money was going. I eventually partnered with, representative Mike McCall in the house, and we started a formal congressional investigation. And even after that, they really pushed back, only allowed us access to a small amount of data. But what we found was extreme expenditures on the part of USAID with very little data driven results. We have seen money funded, in the Wuhan Institute of Virology through dollars steered by USAID on dangerous coronaviruses. We saw how that turned out. We've seen funding going to Morocco for pottery classes, tourism in Lebanon of all places, even when the state department was advising against travel. I could go on and on and on.
nataliegwinters
Posted - February 5, 2025 at 11:18 PM
Saved - February 6, 2025 at 10:47 AM

@nataliegwinters - Natalie Winters

The secrecy of the USAID grant database is by design. Look up the addresses of entities receiving millions of dollars on Google maps and you’ll find shacks or empty land. It’s pure money laundering. https://t.co/bEGe81c9j3

DefiyantlyFree
Posted - February 6, 2025 at 1:17 AM
Saved - February 6, 2025 at 1:55 PM

@DefiyantlyFree - Insurrection Barbie

USAID funneled money to BLM. They paid 27 million dollars to the Tides Center. The Tides Center funnels money directly to BLM.

DecentBackup
Posted - February 8, 2025 at 9:03 PM
Saved - February 9, 2025 at 2:01 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I noticed several names receiving USAID funding through the Internews Agency, including Joseph T Flynn and Lara Logan. It struck me as odd. In response, someone pointed out that the funding process is more complex than it appears. They emphasized that USAID money doesn’t flow directly to these organizations but passes through multiple layers, making it difficult to trace accountability. They urged others to look into the details rather than jump to conclusions, highlighting the broader patterns of funding distribution and influence.

@DecentBackup - BackupDecentFiJC

Oh boy. Just LOOK at all these names getting USAID money through their Internews Agency. Joseph T Flynn Lara Logan Mary F O’Neill Michael T Flynn Paul S Hoffecker Tracy Diaz (Beanz) Weird.

@Spiltea - SpiltyTea

Internews Network leads to Flynn’s America Future. What is an army of digital soldiers?

@DecentBackup - BackupDecentFiJC

“…through their Internews Agency.” Try reading, dipshit.

@s3n10el - The Sen10eL

Wow! This sure is misleading AF…. you do realize people can just go to the website where all of this is listed and see exactly how money flows from the USAID to organizations, right? We can also see that the specific org both Lara and Flynn, and all these people actually, is the last one in a flow of money that leads through no less than 15 other orgs/agencies and even investment banks. At the top of each funding flow, it literally says: “Funding is fungible, meaning USAID dollars DO NOT DIRECTLY FLOW INTO these NGOs in a literal sense. Instead, the money moves through multiple layers, with various entities handling and redistributing it. Rather than focusing solely on individual grants or making definitive statements for how NGOs benefit from USAID, it’s more important recognize the broader pattern of funding distribution and influence, and getting rid of the layers of inaccountability.” By the time it got to Americas First, which is where your compensation numbers come from, it had flown through so many other groups/agencies/investment funds, the funding effectively has no connection to USAID, which is the exact point the website posting this info is making: far reaching Influence without any accountability. It says absolutely nothing about Americas First or any of the officers named in your little screen shot. Period. It took me less than 3 min to figure this out. Stop being lazy and Do better!! https://datarepublican.com/officers/?officer_kw=Lara+Logan

Government NGO Tracking Tracking where the money goes datarepublican.com
TomFitton
Posted - February 10, 2025 at 1:17 PM
Saved - February 11, 2025 at 12:44 PM

@TomFitton - Tom Fitton

USAID funded Soros operations and allies. @JudicialWatch exposed it years ago....six years ago with @TuckerCarlson https://t.co/JsbYlWKFtR

Video Transcript AI Summary
The Obama administration, and even the early Trump administration, used taxpayer money to support the socialist government in Albania. This involved partnering with George Soros on projects aimed at weakening the independence of the Albanian judiciary. This wasn't isolated to Albania; similar activities occurred in Romania, Hungary, Guatemala, and Colombia. Soros, a billionaire, doesn't need this funding, yet the State Department and USAID enabled his influence, allowing him to shape foreign policy and even review funding applications. This taxpayer funding, the speaker argues, indirectly subsidizes Soros’s activities, both domestically and internationally, and is a way for the State Department to oppose conservative agendas. The speaker highlights this as an example of the government funding groups that oppose American interests, while right-leaning organizations are largely ignored. Legal action was necessary to obtain the documents revealing these activities.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Tom Fitton is the president of judicial watch and he joins us tonight. Speaker 1: One of the Speaker 0: reasons I'm so glad that you're here, Tom, is because you kind of tie a bow on stories. The Obama administration's over, but there's a lot that they did that we don't know anything about because the press refused to cover those stories. Tell us this small piece of it. What did they do in Albania and why? Speaker 1: Well, they're supporting the socialist communist government there, the source operations, and they're doing it with taxpayer dollars. They were doing it in 02/2016, and they were even doing it in the first part of the Trump administration in 2017, cosponsoring surveys of the population that generated 91% of the support in favor of the pro government, pro Soros operation that would have restricted the independence of the judiciary. Now like all strong man governments, they don't like independent judiciary. So they were trying to reform the judiciary in a way that would have brought it under the control of the socialist government there. And what's troubling is that obviously Soros needs no taxpayer money to do any of this advocacy work, but the State Department and USAID is partnering with Soros, and basically allowing Soros to set our foreign policy agenda. And then secondly, Soros' operations, according to these documents, were allowed to come into the state department and provide technical reviews of other applications for other government money in Albania. Speaker 0: But I mean George Soros hates The United States and I'm judging that by the projects that he funds all of which are designed to change the country as it is now or to thwart US interests. So why in the world would any state department give money to a Soros funded operation? Speaker 1: Well, it's not only in Albania. We have four had four lawsuits at one point. Albania, Romania, he's active in Hungary, Guatemala, Colombia. They're very, very active, and it doesn't take a lot of money, to have a big impact in these countries. And the governments are under assault from the slora state department unity effort, to bring socialism and stop anything in the area of reform, constitutionalism, the sort of things that Americans would be comfortable with, the Soros groups aren't. And, you know, look, he's billionaire. He doesn't need the money and when you fund him in one place it means he has more money to spend elsewhere so if you don't like what Soros is doing here at home you should know it's being indirectly subsidized thanks to the state department US IID at least as early as at least as soon as long ago as 02/2006. Speaker 0: So Soros is getting state department money, Planned Parenthood which is arm of the Democratic Party gets a half a billion a year in taxpayer funds. Is there any right of center or pro America group that gets any taxpayer funding of any kind? Speaker 1: Well, I think most of them don't think to ask for it, but certainly the state department is not terribly interested in funding groups that are antagonistic to their agenda abroad. And this is kind of another way for the state department to stick it to the Trump administration Yeah. Because some of this activity was taking place in early two thousand seventeen, again, attacking the idea of an independent judiciary in Albania. This is your tax dollars at work and we had to sue to get the records. Speaker 0: The more you know the more appalling it is and thank you for bringing this slide. I appreciate it. Speaker 1: You're welcome. Speaker 0: Jump it.
RealAlexJones
Posted - February 10, 2025 at 3:48 PM
Saved - February 11, 2025 at 11:06 AM

@RealAlexJones - Alex Jones

Learn the Dark Truth About USAID Tax Dollar Waste - It's NOT What You Think! Tune in for more breaking news here: https://t.co/UmBYj7eHGc https://t.co/mToO6qdIwi

Video Transcript AI Summary
To understand Elon Musk's impact on the federal government, look at his actions at Twitter. He reduced expenses, leading to lower tax revenue needs. Increased profitability at Twitter suggests similar potential for the government, allowing for debt reduction and increased service provision. However, this isn't just about money; it's about the direction of funds. Government spending allegedly fuels discord and supports destructive activities, funding organizations that promote censorship and unrest. Infowars claims to offer truthful reporting, contrasting with other media outlets. They emphasize the importance of supporting independent media to counter globalist influence, urging viewers to purchase products and become VIP members to help sustain their broadcasts.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If you wanna understand what Elon Musk is doing now to the federal government, all you have to do is look at what he did at Speaker 1: So now let's think about it. He cut the expenses at Twitter, which would mean he would cut the expenses for the federal government, meaning they would require less tax revenue from you and I. He then made Twitter much more profitable. If he makes the federal government much more profitable, that means more access to pay off our debts and then more access to provide services for the American people. Twitter has greatly benefited from Elon Musk, and our federal government will do the same. The less expenses our government has, the less tax revenue they need to collect from you and I. The less tax revenue you and I pay, the more money we get to keep in our pockets. And the more profitable the government is, the more they can reinvest back into the American people rather than just paying debts. Do not listen to these news outlets. Elon and Doge are doing exactly what we need. Speaker 2: That's all very true, but I I do wanna remind you that this conspiracy is a lot bigger than money. If it was just about the money, then you'd see all sorts of different activities being funded and and, you know, charities being created to exploit the American people and and capture American tax dollars. All of the money always goes strictly towards deconstructionist activity, activity sowing discord and discontent. USAID helped the Dems steal the twenty twenty election by funding the Wuhan lab that created COVID, the ultimate excuse for illegal election tampering. They paid for the gain of function research in the Wuhan lab. They paid for or they they, you know, were one of the main catalysts for in funding the organizations that promoted censorship based in part on COVID nineteen, wanting to stop misinformation because it's not just about information. It's a health issue. And what if they stop people from taking the vaccine? People could die. So, you know, words are violence in this case. They funded Black Lives Matter, which destroyed the country over 2020. It's like everything in our country that all of these problems fabricated from thin air, they all seem to spawn from the government and are funded in one way or another by USAID or any of the other massive slush funds illegally tapped on a continual basis for our destruction. It's not about the money. It's never about the money. Never has been about the money. It's about what the money is going towards and how it's being used. Speaker 3: While other networks lie to you about what's happening now, Infowars tells you the truth about what's happening next. Infowars.com/show. Go to the alexjonesstore.com. Get the very best supplements, the highest quality like ultimate turmeric, ultimate sea moss, and and so many other game changing formulas that you will love and that will blow you away. Then the widest selection of of patriot t shirts and hoodies and sweaters and ball caps, and we're just adding more and more. It is the biggest selection. Over 400 different designs. We are winning, ladies and gentlemen, but Infowars is recognized as the tip of the spear in the fight against the globalist. Elon's kicking their ass. Trump's kicking their ass because you've supported them. But please don't forget about Infowars because in this fight, Elon and Trump, what they're doing is way larger and just incredible and amazing. But you look then below that, and we are the most effective. We are now reaching the most people of any of the shows out there. And not just the Patriot broadcast. We're reaching over a hundred million people a day conservatively, and that's because you stood with us and you supported us. But these new viewers, these new listeners, they're not going to the AlexJonesstore.com, and they're not getting product. It is the hardcore viewers and listeners like you, the patriots that helped launch this whole thing that are keeping us on the air. You're not the Johnny come latelies. You're the people that understand how important it is to support independent patriot, pro human, anti globalist media that are enemies of humanity. So get great products. At the same time, keep us on air at v alex jones store dot com. I wanna thank you all for your past support, and I wanna encourage you now to take action. Become a VIP. It's $30 a month. Cancel anytime. Get $40 to spend in the store each month. Special deals, special sales, special offers. Become a VIP if you're gonna buy anything because you make money on your first purchase when you do it. Again, thank you so much. Check out the showstore.com today, and I thank you for keeping us on the air.
ivan_8848
Posted - February 10, 2025 at 6:55 PM
Saved - February 11, 2025 at 4:21 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe USAID is deeply corrupt, having funneled vast amounts of taxpayer money to various controversial causes. They've allocated hundreds of millions to Soros-linked nonprofits and supported initiatives in countries like Afghanistan, Yemen, and Syria. Notably, funds went to electric vehicles in Vietnam, a transgender clinic in India, and LGBTQ advocacy in multiple countries. USAID has also financed media organizations and projects that align with political agendas. This is just the beginning of exposing what I see as a network of money laundering agencies.

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

USAID is an edless pit of corruption: https://t.co/qRoNXBpqbL -USAID funneled hundreds of millions of dollars to Soros-linked nonprofits -The American taxpayers are giving money to Afghanistan,Yeman and Syria. -USAID has 10,000 people employees, and every year they give away $40 billion -USAID gave money from US taxpayers to support electric vehicles in Vietnam. -USAID gave money from US to a transgender clinic in India. -USAID gave $1.5 million to a Serbian LGBTQ group -USAID spent $164 million to support radical organizations around the world -They gave $122 million of that to groups aligned with foreign terrorist organizations -USAID has given millions of dollars to quote organizations in Gaza controlled by Hamas -$2 million USAID gave money for sex changes in Guatemala -$20 million to produce a new Sesame Street show in Iraq -$4.5 million of taxpayer money to combat misinformation in Kazakhstan -$7.9 million of taxpayer money to a project that would teach Sri Lankan journalists to avoid binary gendered language. (The USAID took 8 million bucks and gave it to a bunch of journalists in Sri Lanka to teach them how to avoid binary gendered language) -USAID gave $1.5 million to promote LGBT advocacy in Jamaica -They gave $1.5 million to rebuild the Cuban media ecosystem -They gave $1.5 million for quote, art for inclusion of people with disabilities in Belarus -Another $3.9 million for LGBT causes in Macedonia - $8.3 million for equity and inclusion education in Nepal -USAID, gifted in 2016, $310 million of taxpayer money to start a Palestinian cement factory project. -USAID's biggest contract recepient of over $17 billion over years CHEMONICS connected to the Clintons, Podesta. -USAID funneled money to BLM -USAID funded Epoch Times -USAID funded Politico -USAID funded the BBC -USAID funded gain of function -USAID has given over $2,000,000,000 to GAVI, the front organization for Bill Gates -UK taxpayers were charged £100 MILLION for USAID -USAID funded 707 Media organizations, 279 "NGO" media outlets, and 6,200 propagandists. Including nine out of ten media outlets in Ukraine. -USAID paid Hollywood stars to travel to Ukraine. -USAID and the CIA secretly worked to impeach Donald Trump from office in 2019 -USAID were spending $40 billion dollars a year This USAID corruption is just the start of exposing these cabal money laundering agencies, wait until we get to the likes of the Red Cross.

@ivan_8848 - Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

The CIA is the Largest Criminal Organization in the World Former CIA Agent John Stockwell https://t.co/ibTLuwMgjE

Video Transcript AI Summary
The CIA's main function is gathering intelligence, but it also engages in covert actions and propaganda. We disseminate propaganda to influence public opinion, sometimes working with journalists. This involves planting false stories, sometimes by using compromised journalists or even creating false narratives with fabricated evidence. This practice isn't limited to foreign countries; we've also planted false stories in the US press. For example, during the Angolan war, we used false stories about Cuban atrocities, including fake photos, which were then spread internationally. We've also sponsored the publication of numerous propaganda books in English, influencing public opinion about Vietnam. While the CIA admits to some propaganda efforts abroad, they deny similar activities within the United States. However, this is untrue, as we planted false stories in the Washington Post.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Let's talk about the function of the CIA. I I think a lot of us have an impression that all the CIA does is, gather intelligence. Intelligence is information, of course. Now one would think that if you obtained information, that was based upon fact. And if that is so, what did you do with it? Speaker 1: Well, one of the four principal functions of the CIA is to gather intelligence and and ideally forward it to the the president, the users of information, the policy makers, as they say. There are other functions, however, some of them more legitimate than others. One is to run secret wars, the covert action that's written and talked about so much, like what's happening in Nicaragua today from Honduras. Another thing is to disseminate propaganda to influence people's minds. And this is a major function of the CIA. And, unfortunately, of course, it overlaps into the gathering of information. You you have contact with a journalist. You will give him true stories. You'll get information from him. You'll also give him false stories. Speaker 0: Did you buy his his confidence with true stories? Speaker 1: You buy his confidence and set him up. We've seen this happen in recently with Jack Anderson, for example, who has his intelligence sources. And he has also admitted that he's been set up by them. You know, every fifth story just simply being false. You also work on their human vulnerabilities to recruit them in a classic sense to make them your agent, so that you can control what they do. So you don't have to set them up sort of, you know, by by putting one over on them. So you can say, here, plant this one next Tuesday. Speaker 0: Can you do this with responsible reporters? Speaker 1: Yes. The church committee brought it out in 1975, and then Woodward and Bernstein put an article in Rolling Stone a couple of years later, 400 journalists cooperating with the CIA, including some of the biggest names in the business to consciously introduce the stories into the press. Speaker 0: Well, give me a concrete example of how you use the press this way. How, false story is planted and how you got it published. Well, for example, Speaker 1: in my my war, the Angola war that I helped to manage, one third of my staff was propaganda. Ironically, it's called covert action inside the CIA. Outside, that means the violent part. I had propagandists all over the world, principally in London, Kinshasa, and Zambia. We were we would take stories which we would write and put them in the Zambia Times, and then pull them out and send them to a journalist on our payroll in Europe. But his cover story, you see, would be that he would he'd gotten them from his stringer in Lusaka, who had gotten them from the Zambia Times. We had the complicity of the government of Zambia, Kenneth Kawunda, if you will, to put these false stories into his newspapers. But after that point, the journalists, Reuters and AFP, the management was not witting of it. Now our contact man in Europe was, and we pumped just just dozens of stories about Cuban atrocities, Cuban rapists. In one case, we had the Cuban rapists caught, and tried by the Ovimbundu maidens who had been their victims. And then we ran photographs that made almost every newspaper in the country of the Cubans being executed by the Ovimbundu women who supposedly had been their victims. Speaker 0: But these were fake photos? Speaker 1: Oh, absolutely. We didn't know of one single atrocity committed by the Cubans. It was pure, raw, false propaganda to to create, an illusion of communists, you know, eating babies for breakfast, and that's sort of totally false propaganda. Speaker 0: John, was this, sort of thing practiced in, Vietnam? Speaker 1: Oh, endlessly a massive propaganda effort in Vietnam in the fifties and in the sixties, 60s including the thousand books that were published several hundred in English, that were also propaganda books sponsored by the CIA. Give some money to a writer, write this book for us. Write anything you want. But on these matters, make sure, you know, you have this line. Speaker 0: Writers in this country, books sold and distributed in this country? Speaker 1: Sure. Yeah. English language books, meaning an American audience as a target on the subject of Vietnam and the history of Vietnam and the history of Marxism, and supporting the domino theory, etcetera. Speaker 0: Without opening us up to a lawsuit, could you name one of them? Speaker 1: No, I could not. The the church committee, when they found this out, demanded that, they be given the titles so that the university libraries could at least go and stamp inside Central Intelligence Agency's version of history. And the CIA refused because it's been commissioned to protect its sources and methods. And the sources would be the authors who wrote these false propaganda books, some of whom are now, distinguished scholars and and journalists. Speaker 0: Well, doesn't the CIA flatly deny? They've admitted that there is some propaganda efforts, but their position is that those are all outside The United States, not in The United States. Isn't that true? Speaker 1: Absolutely. While we were, running Angolan operation and pumping these stories into the world and US press, exactly that time Bill Colby, the CIA director, was testifying to Congress, assuring them that we were extremely careful to make sure that none of our propaganda spilled back into testimony, we were planting stories in the Washington Post. By that, I mean not through Lusaka, but we actually flew a journalist from Paris to Washington to plant a false story. I mention it. I give the text of the story in my book.
JDunlap1974
Posted - February 11, 2025 at 10:53 AM
Saved - February 11, 2025 at 1:26 PM

@JDunlap1974 - JOSH DUNLAP

$50,000,000 in unaudited US taxpayer money in one month alone went to a pro-terrorist group disguised as a climate change organization. https://t.co/DukBLSgsWl

Video Transcript AI Summary
The Inflation Reduction Act's $40 billion for environmental justice through the EPA warrants scrutiny. My staff investigated and found the EPA granted $50 million to the Climate Justice Alliance in December. Their website depicts a bulldozer breaching a fence during the Hamas attack on Israel, alongside the slogan "decolonize Palestine." Further research reveals their affiliation with groups advocating defunding the police and military, and holding anti-American, anti-Israel, and antisemitic views. This raises concerns about how taxpayer money is being used. Is it truly funding environmental cleanup, or is it supporting radical protests? The lack of an EPA inspector general to oversee this funding is alarming. The Biden administration's apparent disregard for this is troubling, and we, on the Environment and Public Works Committee, will continue to investigate.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, I wanted to bring to everybody's attention, something that doesn't get much attention, and you've heard the term follow the money. So I looked up where did follow the money I thought it was from a Tom Cruise movie, but it wasn't. It was from Watergate. And follow the money is what they did in Watergate, and and we saw what happened. So my young staffer, who's very bright, and I see him over there, Adam Pack, followed the money. And the money is from the so called inflation reduction act. So in the name of green and environmental justice, there's over $40,000,000,000 that are gonna be granted out through the EPA. So with this great research that was done, what was discovered that in December, the EPA granted $50,000,000 to an organization called Climate Justice Alliance. So we went to the website of plus of Climate Justice Alliance. This is what we found on the website, that our taxpayer dollars are going to organizations such as this. This, at the bottom, is a picture of the bulldozer that went through the fence when Hamas attacked Israel in on October. They have a rendering on their website. It says decolonize Palestine, and it has a picture of that same bulldozer going through that fence. If you dig deeper, they wanna defund the police, defund the military, either them or their affiliates want to want to have very radical, drastic, initiatives that I think are anti American. And they're certainly anti Israel and anti Semitic. So the Biden administration doesn't seem to care. $50,000,000 in December. Who knows how much more in the future and other like groups because there are other associated groups with this group. There's no inspector general for EPA to follow the money because they don't care. Because all they care about is the mission, the climate mission, no matter what the radical ideas that are associated with the groups. So then you could ask yourself, is this group really going to be funding climate you know, cleaning up the water and cleaning up the soil and cleaning up the air? Or are they gonna be funding things like the protests they had in Hart just several weeks ago where several of them were arrested? So follow the money. We're gonna be doing that in the environment and public works committee. That's where the derivation of this was. And I I find it rather startling to me that the EPA is not doing and the administration are not doing any better research as to where our American taxpayer dollars are going.
RepLuna
Posted - February 13, 2025 at 9:18 PM
Saved - February 14, 2025 at 10:55 AM

@RepLuna - Rep. Anna Paulina Luna

USAID is actively destabilizing nations without any oversight from Congress or the president. These findings from @MikeBenzCyber are unbelievable to say the least. Why should Americans continue to fund this corruption? WATCH: https://t.co/5cYqmXwsk7

Video Transcript AI Summary
Here are examples of instruction manuals one and two, used to destabilize nations. In addition, they advocated for setting up job fairs near some of these sites so that disaffected workers could gain employment. As a member of Congress, I have to ask, did anyone in USAID get elected to Congress or to the presidency? When you're acting in the shadows and destabilizing nations using race wars, and then advocating that the military does it, you put future generations that would have to fight in those wars in jeopardy. Ultimately, you're operating without any oversight.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Here's examples of some of the, instruction manuals here. One and two, in order to destabilize nations. In addition to that, they advocated for setting up job fairs near some of these rights so that disaffected workers could gain employment. Now as a member of congress, I ask myself, did anyone in USAID get elected to congress? How about to a presidency? When you are acting in the shadows and you are destabilizing nations using race wars to do it and then advocating that the military does it. In my opinion, not only do you put the future generations that would have to fight in those wars in jeopardy, but at the end of the day, you're operating without any oversight.

@RepLuna - Rep. Anna Paulina Luna

https://t.co/1bFMF96LTl

DOGECommittee
Posted - February 21, 2025 at 6:29 PM
Saved - February 22, 2025 at 12:42 PM

@DOGECommittee - DOGE Subcommittee

HUNDREDS of BILLIONS of your tax dollars GONE. 💨 Not only wasted, but used to actively undermine U.S. national interests abroad and here at home. This Wednesday at 11AM, @DOGECommittee will EXPOSE the truth about USAID and other foreign aid slush funds. TUNE IN! https://t.co/Ht9oVejDSU

Video Transcript AI Summary
USAID is a fraud and a slush fund for left-wing projects globally, with very little being put to good use. This occurs while denying funds to those who clearly need them, with only cents on the dollar reaching those in need. USAID was initially created for humanitarian purposes, but it has been captured by the military-industrial complex, becoming a sinister propagator of totalitarianism and war. The US government, through USAID, has funded things like DEI initiatives in Serbia, gender surgeries worldwide, sex change surgeries in Guatemala, and social media influencers in Ukraine. USAID is using taxpayer dollars to fund opposition and subvert democracy in other countries. USAID and the CIA don't promote democracy; they are run by radical lunatics that we are working to remove. As an American taxpayer, I don't want my dollars going towards this.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: USAID. USAID. USAID. The USAID was a slush fund for left wing projects around the globe. That's a fraud. The whole thing is a fraud. Very little being put to good use. This was being done, and all this money was being spent while they were denying money to people that clearly needed it. All too often, only cents on the dollar actually makes it to people in need. Speaker 1: My uncle started USAID in 1961 for humanitarian purposes to put our country on the side of the poor. It has been captured by the military industrial complex. It has become a sinister propagator of totalitarianism across and war across the globe. Speaker 2: The US government funded the creation of the virus that caused the global pandemic. Speaker 0: One point five million dollars to advance DEI in Serbia's workplaces. Gender surgeries around the world. Speaker 2: And $2,000,000 for sex change surgeries in Guatemala. Four Point Eight Million Dollars for social media influencers in Ukraine. Speaker 0: Equity and inclusion policy. Where is that money going? It was funded by taxpayer dollars. These are taxpayer dollars. USAID, we're working against you, funding your opposition indirectly, and really trying to subvert democracy in your country. Speaker 1: USAID doesn't really do and the CIA, they don't do democracy. Speaker 0: Did the USAID and the CIA helped orchestrate Trump's impeachment? Well, it was it's been run by a bunch of radical lunatics, and we're getting them out. I don't know about you, but as an American taxpayer, I don't want my dollars going towards this crap, and I know the American people don't either.
WallStreetApes
Posted - May 5, 2025 at 3:00 PM
Saved - May 7, 2025 at 3:20 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I discovered that 7,000 politically connected NGOs are receiving 90% of taxpayer money allocated to nonprofits, totaling around $300 billion annually, with no transparency about its usage. I believe the American people deserve access to the financial records of any organization that receives government funds. All information regarding how this money is spent and the related communications should be public record. After all, it's our money, and these NGOs need to be held accountable.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

It’s money laundering “So it turns out 7,000 politically connected NGOs are receiving 90% of all taxpayer money going to nonprofits. Roughly $300 billion in government money flows through nonprofits every year with zero transparency with regard to where that money goes.” “The American people deserve access to the books of any entity that takes government money, and all information about how that money is used and the communications around it need to be considered public record. That's our money, and these NGOs need to start answering to us.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
It is claimed that 7,000 politically connected NGOs receive 90% of all taxpayer money allocated to nonprofits. Approximately $300 billion in government funds are allegedly funneled through nonprofits annually without transparency. The speaker asserts that the American public has a right to access the financial records of any organization receiving government money. They state that all information pertaining to the use of these funds and related communications should be considered public record. The speaker concludes that these NGOs should be accountable to the public.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So it turns out 7,000 politically connected NGOs are receiving 90% of all taxpayer money going to nonprofits. Roughly $300,000,000,000 in government money flows through nonprofits every year with zero transparency with regard to where that money goes. The American people deserve access to the books of any entity that takes government money, and all information about how that money is used and the communications around it need to be considered public record. That's our money. And these NGOs need to start answering to us.
MonBreeden
Posted - May 7, 2025 at 6:54 PM
Saved - May 8, 2025 at 12:02 AM

@MonBreeden - Monica

Re: Politically connected NGOs: 🇺🇸💥💜The American People deserve access to the books of any entity that takes government money and all info about how it is used. 💥That is our money, and now it’s time, the NGOs need to answer to us.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

It’s money laundering “So it turns out 7,000 politically connected NGOs are receiving 90% of all taxpayer money going to nonprofits. Roughly $300 billion in government money flows through nonprofits every year with zero transparency with regard to where that money goes.” “The American people deserve access to the books of any entity that takes government money, and all information about how that money is used and the communications around it need to be considered public record. That's our money, and these NGOs need to start answering to us.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
It is claimed that 7,000 politically connected NGOs receive 90% of all taxpayer money allocated to nonprofits. Approximately $300 billion in government funds are allegedly funneled through nonprofits annually, lacking transparency regarding the money's destination. The speaker asserts that the American public has a right to access the financial records of any organization receiving government funds. They state that all information pertaining to the use of these funds and related communications should be considered public record. The speaker concludes that these NGOs must be accountable to the public.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So it turns out 7,000 politically connected NGOs are receiving 90% of all taxpayer money going to nonprofits. Roughly $300,000,000,000 in government money flows through nonprofits every year with zero transparency with regard to where that money goes. The American people deserve access to the books of any entity that takes government money, and all information about how that money is used and the communications around it need to be considered public record. That's our money. And these NGOs need to start answering to us.
BarryOue21536
Posted - May 22, 2025 at 1:56 PM
Saved - May 28, 2025 at 12:10 PM

@BarryOue21536 - Beirut Barry

https://t.co/GhhBPtSscu ARE YOU FNG kidding Me ... the Hell 🔥with UNITED NATIONS 🚨 All tax payers NEED to listen to this US Politicians are being paid off to not vet US Taxpayer money being sent overseas “I was the senior vetting officer at USAID .

Video Transcript AI Summary
International NGOs and UN agencies allegedly lobby in Washington D.C. against vetting policies that would prevent foreign aid from reaching terrorists. USAID effectively self-funds its own external private lobby that asks Congress for more money for USAID. This lobby brings together groups that work with groups that kill Americans. USAID programs have not been aligned with U.S. national security interests and have helped China. USAID pushes much of the world towards China on the green energy agenda and causes resentment through social reengineering. Lobbyists have tried to kill legislation like H.R. 160, which was meant to increase transparency in USAID's funding of overseas organizations and give US Lawmakers the ability to have higher transparency in terror financing investigations aimed at scrutinizing extremist groups. A regulation requiring names of those handling money in terrorist areas to be checked against terrorist databases was overturned by Biden.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: How do terrorists explored our foreign aid loopholes? Speaker 1: Well, we have we have a lot of our international Speaker 0: Can you pull your mic up? I'm sorry. I'm Speaker 1: Can you hear me? Speaker 0: Yes, Speaker 1: sir. You have international NGOs and UN agencies actively lobby here in Washington DC against vetting vetting policies that would prevent it. I was the senior vetting officer at USAID. Speaker 0: And what But I'm saying, did you say United Nations is doing this? The UN? Speaker 1: Sure. They everybody's everybody's getting money lobbies here. Speaker 0: That they're lobbying against us. I'm sorry, mister Roman. You're Speaker 2: There's actually someone who used to work for one of those lobbies. The largest NGO lobby, Interxion. One of our co witnesses here worked for them from 2018 to 2023. USAID effectively self funds its own external private lobby that then goes back to congress and asks for more money for USAID. So the taxpayers fund this lobbyist who's working against American interests Correct. Speaker 0: Possibly killing our allies and possibly Americans. Speaker 2: They bring together groups in Washington that overseas work with groups that kill Americans. Yeah. I don't Speaker 0: need a flowchart to show that. I appreciate it. Do you think USA programs have been aligned with the national security interest of The US? Speaker 1: No. They have not. They have actually helped China. Speaker 2: Mister Roman? No. Okay. Speaker 0: How do these programs compromise our national security, mister Primerich? Speaker 1: They actually push China. They actually push much of the world towards China on the green energy agenda. They push people ordinary people, billions of people towards China because of the resentment caused by our social reengineering. Speaker 0: Are we being lobbied by these pro communist China groups currently? Speaker 1: Well, a lot of these countries don't even have to lobby because they get the money anyway like South Africa. Speaker 2: Yeah. And in fact, these lobbyists have come to the house and have tried to kill legislation like h r one sixty, which was meant to increase transparency in USAID's funding of overseas organizations. Speaker 0: Is that a current piece of legislation? Speaker 2: That's from the last session. Speaker 0: Last and give me that number again. Speaker 2: HR one sixty. And what does it do? It was meant to give US Lawmakers the ability to have higher transparency in terror financing investigations aimed at scrutinizing extremist groups. Mister Primark? Speaker 1: We had a regulation before we left in the last administration that anybody who touches money in area in countries where there's terrorists, those names have to go through databases terrorist databases. That was overturned by Biden. Speaker 0: Overturned by Biden.
Real_RobN
Posted - May 26, 2025 at 1:53 AM
Saved - May 27, 2025 at 5:38 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I discussed the failure of Republicans to codify DOGE cuts and questioned whether USAID's DOGE team has found any evidence of radical left Democrats, like Maxine Waters and Nancy Pelosi, receiving money directly from USAID. I believe that USAID and NGOs are intertwined with Congress, leading to issues like bribery and money laundering. I also referenced Elon Musk's confidence that a significant amount of this money returns to the U.S., suggesting that many members of Congress are unusually wealthy.

@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

Here is why Republicans failed to codify DOGE cuts. Has USAID’s DOGE team found any evidence that any of the radical left Democrats — such as Maxine Waters, Adam Schiff, Chuck Schumer, or Nancy Pelosi — have received money directly from USAID? Absolutely: USAID + NGOs (Government funded non-governmental organizations) = U.S. Congress—bribery, money laundering and racketeering. @elonmusk “I am highly confident that a bunch of that money comes back to the U.S. and lands in the pockets of those you just mentioned.. I’ll just say there’s a lot of strangely wealthy members of Congress.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker was asked if there is evidence that Maxine Waters, Adam Schiff, and Chuck Schumer have received money directly from USAID. The speaker responded that taxpayer money is sent to government organizations, then to NGOs, which are government-funded but not governed by U.S. laws. Money is sent overseas to NGOs and the speaker is confident that some of it returns to the U.S. and ends up with the aforementioned politicians. The speaker states that it's not a direct route, but that some members of Congress are strangely wealthy, accumulating millions while earning significantly less annually, which is unexplainable. The speaker says they are going to try to figure it out and stop it from happening.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: My question is about USAID. Has the Doge team found any evidence that any of the radical left Democrats like Maxine Waters, Adam Schiff, Chuck Schumer have received money directly from USAID? And if so, will we be hearing about that evidence anytime soon? Speaker 1: Yeah. So the the there is a massive amount of corruption, it it is circuitous. So what happens is there's money that obviously it's your taxpayer money that that is then sent to various government organizations who then send it to to NGOs, which which an NGO is a non governmental organization, but obviously, it's a government funded non governmental organization, it's just an organization, it's just the government. And effectively, there's a giant fraud loophole, which is that the the government can send money to an NGO that is then no longer governed by the law laws of The United States. So they'll they'll send the money overseas to one NGO, then they'll go through a bunch of bunch of them. And then I'm highly confident that a bunch of that money then comes back to The United States and lands in the pockets of the people you just mentioned. But it is a circuitous route. It's not like it it it doesn't go directly. But let's just say that there's a lot of strangely wealthy members of congress where I'm I just can't I'm I'm trying to connect the dots of how do they become rich while earning how do they get 20,000,000 if they're earning 200,000 a year? Sounds that's how how do I just nobody can explain that. So so so something's yeah. We we we we're gonna try to figure it out and and and and certainly stop it from happening. So
RickyDoggin
Posted - October 4, 2025 at 4:55 PM
Saved - October 6, 2025 at 5:34 AM

@RickyDoggin - A Man Of Memes

Glenn Beck uncovers the ties between USAID, CIA, and Soros. USAID is clearly the head of the deep state snake. We now know who owns the politicians that are having a melt down about a USAID audit. https://t.co/a45TE0TEvc

Video Transcript AI Summary
I have a picture here of an Al Qaeda leader and they are in a USAID tent. Look who signed the check for the initial $200,000 payment to the Islamic Relief Agency, the United States Agency for International Development. USAID was running a top secret espionage program to undermine Cuba and push people to dissent. Now let me show you how much money we're talking about. It included a billion dollar sovereign loan guarantee, $320,000,000 in general assistance. Judicial Watch found that the US State Department and USAID had been giving millions to the Macedonian arm of George Soros' Open Society Foundation. To train youth movements. So USAID and those are always they're known by anybody who pays attention as CIA fronts. This is you know, the the USAID comes into a country. they start doing things, and next thing you know, we've got a revolution on our hands because that's the CIA.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I have a picture here of an Al Qaeda leader and they are in a USAID tent. Look who signed the check for the initial $200,000 payment to the Islamic Relief Agency, the United States Agency for International Development. The more you look into USAID, the more shocked you will become. USAID was running a top secret espionage program to undermine Cuba and push people to dissent. Now let me show you how much money we're talking about. It included a billion dollar sovereign loan guarantee, $320,000,000 in general assistance. So where else beside the NIH has money been coming from? By far, the largest donors are from USAID and the Department of Defense? Judicial Watch found that the US State Department and USAID had been giving millions to the Macedonian arm of George Soros' Open Society Foundation. What for? To train youth movements. So USAID and those are always they're known by anybody who pays attention as CIA fronts. This is you know, the the USAID comes into a country. They start doing things, and next thing you know, we've got a revolution on our hands because that's the CIA.
View Full Interactive Feed