reSee.it - Related Post Feed

SteveTownsend0
Posted - September 7, 2023 at 5:13 PM
Saved - September 8, 2023 at 3:17 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Elon Musk's role isn't to ease tensions; that's the State Department's job. Disagree with current policy? Ukraine's next elections are in 2024. Imagine if LockheedMartin sabotaged HiMARS due to CEO's fears. Similar to Musk's interaction with a pro-Russian influencer, this demands investigation for US national security.

@SteveTownsend0 - Steve Townsend

It is not @ElonMusk's job to de-escalate the war. That is why we have @StateDept. If you don't agree with current policy, which is for Ukraine to win, the next elections will be up in 2024. Imagine if @LockheedMartin remotely reprogrammed HiMARS to fail to fire because the CEO got nervous fee-fees about nuclear war after talking to some @TheGrayZoneNews jurnalist. Well, that is analogous to what happened here. This revelation and records of Musk and Tw/SpaceX senior security engineer @cstanley openly joshing with pro-russian influencer @stillgray demand investigation, in the interest of US national security.

@BriannaWu - Brianna Wu

A billionaire is undermining the national security policy of the United States. Normal people would go to prison for this. https://www.thedailybeast.com/musk-secretly-used-starlink-to-foil-ukrainian-drone-attack-on-russian-ships-report?utm_source=twitter_owned_tdb&utm_medium=socialflow&via=twitter_page&utm_campaign=owned_social

Musk Secretly Used Starlink to Foil Ukrainian Drone Attack on Russian Ships: Report The billlionaire allegedly feared the strike on Crimea could trigger nuclear war. thedailybeast.com
KanekoaTheGreat
Posted - September 7, 2023 at 7:28 PM
Saved - September 8, 2023 at 5:29 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Elon Musk's Starlink internet has been crucial for Ukraine, providing connectivity to the front lines. However, Musk refuses to allow it to be used in long-range drone attacks on Russia, fearing it could escalate the conflict and trigger a nuclear war. Despite his clear stance, some media outlets are tarnishing his reputation. Musk emphasizes that Starlink should serve humanitarian and defensive purposes. He declined activation in a scenario that could have led to a major act of war. The media's attempt to portray him as a Russian agent is baseless. Musk's efforts to prevent a potential nuclear war deserve appreciation.

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

The corporate media is churning out negative articles about @elonmusk, who has been generously providing free Starlink internet to Ukraine at a cost exceeding $80 million since the war began. Why? He doesn't want his satellites used in long-range drone attacks on Russia, as he fears it could worsen the conflict and even trigger a nuclear war. Musk has firmly rejected the idea of allowing Starlink to be used in a way that could escalate the conflict into World War III. Here are some quotes from Musk since the war started: "Starlink is the communication backbone of Ukraine, especially at the front lines, where almost all other Internet connectivity has been destroyed. But we will not enable escalation of conflict that may lead to WW3." "SpaceX’s out of pocket cost to enable & support Starlink in Ukraine is ~$80M so far. Our support for Russia is $0. Obviously, we are pro Ukraine. Trying to retake Crimea will cause massive death, probably fail & risk nuclear war. This would be terrible for Ukraine & Earth." "SpaceX Starlink has become the connectivity backbone of Ukraine all the way up to the front lines. This is the damned if you do part. However, we are not allowing Starlink to be used for long-range drone strikes. This is the damned if you don’t part." ----- It's entirely reasonable not to want your satellite technology involved in triggering a catastrophic world war, especially with Russia, which would have dire consequences for humanity. Despite Musk's clear public statements that Starlink won't be used for long-range drone attacks, some media outlets are now attempting to tarnish his reputation for not permitting Starlink to be used in such a manner. In my view, these click-bait sensationalist headlines are disgusting, and I extend my appreciation to @elonmusk for his efforts in preventing a potential nuclear war.

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

The corporate media is sadly trying to spin this to portray @elonmusk as some Russian agent. The reality is that Starlink was never used in this part of Ukraine, and Musk declined activation due to concerns about his satellite technology being involved in a 'Mini Pearl Harbor' attack on the Russian Navy, a scenario that he believed could possibly trigger a nuclear war. Musk consistently emphasized that Starlink should exclusively serve humanitarian and defensive purposes, such as supporting hospitals, ambulances, and banking systems. Ukraine's intention was to use it on drones to target Russian ships. @elonmusk: "The Starlink regions in question were not activated. SpaceX did not deactivate anything." ----- "There was an emergency request from government authorities to activate Starlink all the way to Sevastopol. The obvious intent being to sink most of the Russian fleet at anchor. If I had agreed to their request, then SpaceX would be explicitly complicit in a major act of war and conflict escalation." ----- "Both sides should agree to a truce. Every day that passes, more Ukrainian and Russian youth die to gain and lose small pieces of land, with borders barely changing. This is not worth their lives." ----- The real question here is why is Walter Isaacson, who just wrote a biography of Elon Musk, saying that Elon turned it off while Elon is saying that it was never turned on? Additionally, why is the media trying to smear Elon as some Russian asset when that couldn't be further from the truth?

DJHammmick
Posted - September 7, 2023 at 11:30 PM
Saved - October 30, 2023 at 2:49 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Elon Musk's recent actions have sparked controversy. After boasting about donating a service to Ukraine, he suggested that the US government should cover the costs. However, when Ukraine needed the service the most, Musk turned it off. This raised suspicions of him being a Russian or Chinese asset, as it is not his place to disable military capabilities after providing them. Some even accused him of colluding with Russia and sabotaging Ukraine. Musk's admission of collusion only added fuel to the fire.

@DJHammmick - DJHammick

I usually find it funny when @elonmusk trolls everybody.. (it was still my idea to use slow moving drones, to bypass ships radars) But anyway, yeah like wtf!? Elon bragged about donating this service to Ukraine and then touted that the us government should foot the bill,

@DJHammmick - DJHammick

And then when they needed it most he turns it off?! Are you a Russian or Chinese asset @elonmusk.. it’s not your call to turn off military capabilities after you provide them! That’s sabotage! Literally.

@DJHammmick - DJHammick

@elonmusk @elonmusk sabotaged the Ukrainian military! 😂. You can’t use I thought Russia was going to nuke us, that’s not your call.. so basically you spoke with Russian officials, you COLLUDED WITH RUSSIA AND SABOTAGED UKRAINE, are you retarded!? 😂

@DJHammmick - DJHammick

@elonmusk And then admitted to the collusion. 😂

SystemUpdate_
Posted - September 10, 2023 at 3:07 PM
Saved - September 10, 2023 at 3:50 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Elon Musk faces criticism for refusing to activate Starlink satellites, seen by some as treason. The media attacks him for challenging their power to silence dissent. Musk's crime? Not obeying Ukraine's demands, despite not being a citizen. This highlights the attempt to stifle opposition and ban dissent. Many Americans would also be considered traitors if judged by the same standards. The goal is to strip Musk's rights and censor any questioning of government war policies. It's crucial to protect the right to oppose.

@SystemUpdate_ - System Update

Elon Musk is under fire, again, this time from neocons and corporate journalists insisting that his refusal to turn on Starlink satellites to enable an escalation of Ukraine's military actions amounts to a form of treason. From where does this obligation come? Do we care that this attack may have caused a major escalation of this war?

Video Transcript AI Summary
Elon Musk denied Starlink services to the Ukrainian military's submarines as they planned to attack the Russian Navy. Despite providing Ukraine with $1 billion worth of free Starlink services, Musk refused to extend it further, fearing it would escalate the conflict. He believed that complying with the request would make SpaceX complicit in an act of war. Musk's decision led to accusations of treason and calls for the US government to seize his company. However, it is important to question whether private companies or foreign governments have an obligation to fulfill every demand of the Ukrainian military. Refusing such demands does not necessarily make one pro-Russian.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: A new biography of Elon Musk claims that Musk denied Starlink services to the Ukrainian military, specifically to its fleet of submarines as they prepare to attack the Russian Navy. Musk's company, SpaceX, controls more satellites they send any company or government in the world and is used to, among other things, ensure Internet connection anywhere in the world even if the military forces of one's enemy tries to deny Internet service by bombing. Musk has provided Ukraine with 1,000,000,000 of dollars of free Starlink services since the war began when the U. S. Government refused originally to compensate them for it. He originally said he would have to withdraw it because they couldn't afford it, but then announced he would continue to provide it for free. But it. As always with Ukraine and its supporters, nothing is never enough. You must always give more. Musk confirmed part of the story its in this new biography, and provided his motive this way, quote, There was an emergency request from government authorities, meaning in Ukraine and then in the United States, to activate STARLINK all the way to Sevastopol, the obvious intent being to sink most of the Russian fleet at anchor. If I had agreed to their request, then SpaceX would be explicitly complicit in a major act of war and conflict escalation. A he went on to point out that he didn't actually cut off existing services, but just refused the request of the Ukrainian military to extend it even further so they could attack the Russians in an all new way that he feared would lead to escalation, that his company and he would ultimately be responsible for it ethically, if not legally. Now it. That concession immediately led to widespread accusations that Musk was guilty of treason or at least being pro Russian and calls for the United States government to seize his company, his Starlink services, were widespread. But in what way is this pro Russian? Do private companies or, for that matter, foreign governments have some obligation to provide the Ukrainian military with everything and anything it demands? Its are those who refuse those demands, including out of a desire not to help escalate a already dangerous war, are they inherently guilty of wanting the Kremlin to win the war or being pro

@SystemUpdate_ - System Update

It’s never been easier to be a “Russian propagandist” or “Kremlin agent” now (just don’t expect a paycheck) — all it takes is voicing any view oppositional to the prevailing media view on our involvement in Ukraine. https://t.co/EFEUOTTtTu

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker criticizes anti-war conservatives for aligning with left-wing and Islamist anti-war movements, denying and excusing terror, spreading conspiracy theories, and wanting America's enemies to win. They mention how similar language is now used to discredit anyone questioning the U.S. war effort in Ukraine, labeling them as pro-Russian propagandists. The speaker emphasizes that dissent and resistance to the prevailing media and political orthodoxy on the war are met with demands for censorship, accusing dissenters of spreading pro-Russian propaganda. They argue that the war serves the interests of the arms industry, CIA, and financial institutions, while advocating for the destruction and rebuilding of Ukraine.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: From went on, quote, but the anti war conservatives have gone far, far beyond the advocacy of alternative strategies they have made common cause with the left wing and Islamist anti war movements in this country and in Europe. They deny an excused terror. They espouse is a potentially self fulfilling defeatism? They publicize wild conspiracy theories, and some of them explicitly yearn for the victory of their nation's enemies. Do you see how the language has not changed at all? It's just repurposed. They espouse conspiracy theories. They don't believe in the crimes of the other side. They, in fact, want the other side to win. They want America's enemies to triumph. He's talking here about people who very presciently and wisely knew that, people like David Frum were vying. And that we were getting into a Quagmire that would have no exit, where hundreds of thousands if not millions of people would die, where we would spend 1,000,000,000,000 of dollars pursuing a goal that we had no business pursuing. And for that, they were routinely branded by people like David Frum as being pro Al Qaeda, pro terrorist, pro Iraq, pro Saddam, spreading conspiracy theories, etc. And if that language doesn't sound familiar to you, which should, because it's exactly the language now marshaled, to try and destroy the reputations of anybody who questions the U. S. War effort in Ukraine. Everyone who has done so, who stood up, has been officially decreed to be pro Russian propagandist. I've been put on several lists, at least official lists of the U. S. Of the Ukrainian government, of the Ukrainian intelligence agencies for being a pro Russian propagandist, even though never once in my life have I uttered a positive word about Vladimir Putin or the Russian government. It's not necessary. The only thing necessary is any kind of questioning, any kind of resistance to, any kind of dissent from The prevailing media political orthodoxy on this war, that the United States Government has the moral obligation and the legal obligation to deplete our own military if necessary to go further into 1,000,000,000,000 of dollars or 100 of 1,000,000,000 of dollars into debt in order to feed the Ukrainians forever to destroy Ukraine and then rebuild it, while the arms industry and the CIA benefit along the way, while BlackRock and JPMorgan and other vaulters wait in the wings for the rebuilding effort. That's what this war has been about from the beginning and still is in the way that they try and Not just stigmatize, but demand the censorship of Any dissenters is by claiming that they're spreading pro Russian propaganda or even pro Kremlin.

@SystemUpdate_ - System Update

.@GGreenwald “The reason why Elon Musk is being targeted by the ADL as an anti-Semite and now being depicted as a traitor to his country, the United States… is not because necessarily they're angry about what he did in Ukraine, although they are, but more so because it's punishment for his refusal to censor on demand.” The media continues its relentless attacks on Elon Musk because he poses an existential threat to what they hold most dear –– their ability to silence any opposition.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Elon Musk is being targeted by the ADL as an anti-Semite and traitor to the US because he refuses to censor on demand. If he buys Twitter and reduces censorship, it poses a threat to establishment centers of power. They fear free speech on the internet. They blamed the free internet for Brexit and Trump's election, leading to increased censorship. Elon Musk is one of the few in technology standing up against this censorship.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The reason why Elon Musk is being targeted by the ADL as an anti Semite and now being depicted as a traitor to his country, the United States. He is a citizen of the United States, even though he also was a citizen of South Africa and I believe Canada, is not because Clearly, they're angry about what he did in Ukraine, although they are, but more so because it's punishment for his refusal to censor on demand. We predicted this way early that if Elon Musk actually buys Twitter and proceeds to even partially fulfill his word to reduce censorship on the platform, there's no way they're going to permit that. There's no way establishment centers of power in the West will permit that because that is way too much of a threat to them. The thing they are feared the most is free speech on the Internet. We documented that on Wednesday when we went through the historical context of how they watched the British people defy their orders and voted for Brexit to leave the EU. And then months later, the American people all asked Donald Trump and not Hillary Clinton and that scared them to their bones. They went into panic mode. They genuinely did. It was traumatizing for them. And they ended up blaming a free Internet for it, saying that if we don't control the Internet, there going to be disinformation circulating on the Internet that will deceive people into voting against the way we tell them to vote. They'll end up voting for Brexit. They'll end up voting for Trump, not for the candidates that we want. And ever since then, they've been imposing a regime of censorship that has been growing by the year and now targeting the one of the only people in technology who's standing up to that, which is Elon Musk.

@SystemUpdate_ - System Update

Musk’s only “crime” was not following Ukraine’s orders –– a country he doesn’t even count among his three citizenships. .@GGreenwald “The pretense here is that you have no right to resist the Ukrainian military’s demands. If you’re a citizen of the West you are duty-bound to give them everything they demand, and if you don’t, that’s considered sabotage."

Video Transcript AI Summary
Elon Musk reportedly ordered his engineers to turn off Starlink coverage near the Crimean coast, preventing drones packed with explosives from reaching their target. Ukraine urgently requested Musk to restore the service, but he refused, stating that he did not want his satellites used for offensive purposes. The book attempts to portray Musk as a traitor, but in reality, he simply chose not to assist in escalating the conflict, especially considering the potential for a nuclear response. The underlying message seems to be that citizens of the west are expected to comply with the demands of the Ukrainian military without question, and any resistance is labeled as sabotage.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Isaac Newton writes that the that Musk reportedly panicked when he heard about the planned Ukrainian attack, which was using Starlink satellites to guide 6 drones packed with explosives towards the Crimean coast. After speaking to the Russian ambassador to the United Nate United States who reportedly told him an attack on Crimea, would trigger a nuclear response. Musk took matters into his own hands and ordered his engineers to turn off Starlink coverage within 100 kilometers of the Crimean coast. This caused the drones to lose connectivity and wash ashore harmlessly, effectively sabotaging touching the offensive mission. Ukraine's reaction was immediate. Officials frantically called Musk and asked them to turn back the service on, turn back, turned the service back on, telling him that quote the drone's subs were crucial to their fight for freedom, but Musk was unwavering. He argued that Ukraine was going too far and inviting strategic defeat and that he did not want his satellites used for offensive purposes. Now according to the book, US officials then called Musk, got a hold of him several hours later, and he agreed to restore services or to activate the services, as he had been doing since the start of the war. But you can see the flamboyant attempt to depict Elon Musk as actively sabotaging in a war being fought by Ukraine and supported by the United States and NATO, which is designed to essentially defect them as a traitor, subverting the war policies of the United States government. Even though what he really did, he didn't actively subvert or sabotage anything. He just refused to have his company assist in the escalation of ore when the Russians were telling him that it very could likely could lead to a nuclear exchange. In other words, the subtext, the pretense here is that you have no right to resist the Ukrainian military's demands if you're a citizen of the west. You are duty bound to give them everything they demand. And if you don't, that's considered sabotage.

@SystemUpdate_ - System Update

Using the reasoning applied to Elon Musk, the vast majority of Americans are also “traitors,” since most people didn’t take President Zelensky’s invitation to go to Ukraine and join the fight against Russia. https://t.co/QBr5bmIHJc

Video Transcript AI Summary
President Zelensky urged Western supporters of Ukraine to join the fight against the Russian army due to Ukraine's disadvantage in population size. He called for assistance in the form of arms and manpower, emphasizing the importance of continuously sending soldiers to the front lines. However, despite repeated pleas, only a few individuals from the West chose to participate in the war effort. The majority opted not to get involved, potentially hindering the Ukrainian military and US war policy in Ukraine.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Early on in the war, President Zelensky issued a plea to Westerners who support the Ukrainian cause who are of fighting age to go to Ukraine and pick up arms and help them fight the Russian army. Because Zelensky knew, and it's turned out to be true, that the Ukrainians had a huge disadvantage, many disadvantages, but one that the biggest was simply population size. In a ground war of attrition like this, the ability to just keep sending men to the front, men to the front, men to the front is crucial. It sounds harsh, it sounds primitive, but that's the nature of this war. And Russia is many times larger than Ukraine and therefore has a much larger population to dip into to spend as soldiers to go and fight the Ukraine. They can just outlast Ukraine for that reason alone. So Zelensky sent out repeated pleas saying, look, if you're in the West and you support our cause, don't posted on Twitter or Facebook posting Ukrainian flag emojis, come to Ukraine. We'll give you arms for free and you can help fight the Russians, but a lot of people chose not to for whatever reasons. Maybe they were scared. Maybe they thought the war was important, but not important enough to go fight in, meaning they were willing to have other people die in the war, but didn't want to die themselves in it. Maybe they were too busy, maybe whatever. But they made the choice, every single person in the West, to go or not go. And overwhelmingly, almost everybody, very few exceptions, chose not to go and fight with Ukraine in that war. A few people went, but very few. By this reasoning, those people can be said to have sabotaged the war, the Ukrainian military effort and the U. S. War policy in Ukraine by not going and giving Zelensky what he demanded. That's all

@SystemUpdate_ - System Update

.@GGreenwald “What is actually going on here is an attempt to legally ban any dissent, take away Elon Musk's right to be a military contractor, haul him before a congressional committee, require Twitter to ban what they're calling pro-Russia propaganda, which is really nothing other than people questioning or opposing their war policy of their government –– which is absolutely the right of every American citizen or the citizen of any country to do.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
David Frum accuses an American citizen and US government contractor of sabotaging a military operation in Ukraine. He claims that this act could have shortened the Russian war, saved lives, and ended the Russian food blockade in Africa and Asia. Frum argues that anyone who questions or opposes the war in Ukraine is deemed unpatriotic and morally wrong. He suggests that dissenters should be investigated by Congress and that platforms like Twitter should ban what they consider pro-Russia propaganda. Frum's rhetoric aims to suppress any form of dissent and limit the rights of individuals to express their opinions on government policies.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Quote. This is David Frum speaking. 20 years after he first accused antiwar opponents of the war in Iraq of being unpatriotic. He says, An American citizen and U. S. Government contractor acknowledges that he personally sabotaged the military operation of a U. S. Ally. Musk thwarted what might have been a decisive military operation to shorten the Russian war against Ukraine, save who knows how many lives and put an end to the Russian food blockade of poor countries in Africa and Asia, all while a US government contractor. So apparently, these few drones were gonna bring down the entire Russian military, the few drones that the Russians were planning on launching on this one specific day. But what's really going on here is that they are simply fortifying a climate in which it is the moral obligation of everybody to pay homage to Ukraine and to every other US ally as he put it. If you question the war in Ukraine, if you are opposed to the war in Ukraine, if you don't want your tax money going there, if you are not willing to go and fight even though David Frum and his family aren't Of course, apparently you are of bad moral character, you're unpatriotic, you don't deserve to be a U. S. Military contractor and You probably should be investigated by the Congress, which is what his last week called for. Do you see how consistent the rhetoric is? Do you see what the framework here is for what the Washington establishment does to anybody who Distense from them. And again, if it were just about unjust reputational destruction the way it was back in the war on terror when people were accused of being outside of Al Qaeda, that would be one thing I would still object, but not as strenuously. What is actually going on here is an attempt to legally ban any dissent, take away Elon Musk's right to be a military contractor or haul them before a congressional committee, require Twitter to ban what they are calling pro Russia propaganda, which is really nothing other than people questioning or opposing Their war policy of their government, which is absolutely the right of every American citizen or the citizen of any country to do.
TheChiefNerd
Posted - September 12, 2023 at 5:27 PM
Saved - September 13, 2023 at 12:26 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Elon Musk reveals Ukrainian government's request to activate Starlink in Crimea, likening it to a surprise attack. Urged to participate in a significant act of war, Musk discloses the unexpected nature of the situation. #ElonMusk #Starlink #Ukraine #Crimea

@TheChiefNerd - Chief Nerd

Elon Musk Says the Request to Turn on Starlink in Crimea Came from the Ukrainian Government in the Middle of the Night "We figured out that this was kind of like a Pearl Harbor like attack...So they really asked us to proactively take part in a major act of war" @elonmusk @DavidSacks @theallinpod

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker explains that the region of Crimea was initially turned off due to US sanctions against Russia, which included Crimea. The Ukraine government urgently requested the speaker to turn on connectivity to Crimea, which they initially found confusing. The speaker clarifies that while they support the Ukrainian government, they cannot act without explicit government approval. They mention that if they had received a request from the American president, they would have complied. The speaker acknowledges that they were attacked and mentions that Secretary Blinken was supportive despite the accusations made by Jake Tapper during an interview. The conversation ends with the idea that this situation is an example of a good deed being punished.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: At the at the time this happened, the, region around your your, Crimea, was was actually turned off. Now, the reason it was turned off was actually, originally was because United States had sanctions against Russia, and we're not allowed to actually and that includes Crimea in the sanctions and we're not allowed to actually turn on, connectivity to sanction the country without explicit government approval, sure we did not have in US government. So, So so, basically, the, Ukraine didn't didn't didn't give us any any advanced warning for heads up or anything, where we just got the the sort of, urgent calls from the Ukraine government saying that we needed to turn on Crimea. It's like in the middle of the night basically. We're like, what are you talking about? You know, I was just Speaker 1: You lost? Speaker 0: Who's it for? You know, and that, you know, we're basically, figured out that this was kind of like a whole other type attack on, Sfaxpole, on the Russian defense Sfaxpole. So they're really asking us for to to really proactively take part in a major act for, and, You know, while we certainly have huge support for the Ukrainian government, the Ukrainian government is not in charge of US people or companies. Speaker 1: And and, Elon, if if I could just But but Speaker 0: I should say that, you know, well, below I'm not president Biden's big spend, if if I had received a presidential directives turn it on, I would have done so because I do regard the president as the chief executive officer of the country whether I want that most of the the president or not, I so respect the office and so if if, you know, if we've we've gotten a if I've gotten a request from the president type of thing from the you said American president, is it clear? Yeah. Then I I would have turned it on, you know, so but those such requests came through. Speaker 1: That's a really that's a really interesting point and, you're I mean, the What Chamath's referring to is you're now being attacked. I saw there was, there was Jake Tapper, the other day on CNN interviewing our Secretary of State was just he was All lathered up basically attacking you for this. David David Speaker 0: I mean, to his credit, secretary, Blinken was actually quite supportive Yeah. Despite the absurd, you know, accusations and leading questions of Jake Topper on CNN. Speaker 1: Yeah. He didn't take the bait Speaker 0: to his credit. Sergei Lincoln, put something in this regard, for not, taking the bait at all. Speaker 1: Yes. Well, to me, this is an example of no good deed goes unpunished because if you had never given I
DrLoupis
Posted - September 24, 2023 at 10:53 AM
Saved - September 24, 2023 at 1:02 PM

@DrLoupis - Dr. Anastasia Maria Loupis

Julian Assange: “The goal is to use Ukraine to wash money out of the US and Europe through Ukraine and back into the hands of of a transnational elite (BlackRock). The goal is an endless war, not a successful war” @Resist_05

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker explains that the objective is not to fully control Afghanistan, but rather to utilize it as a means to launder money from the tax systems of the United States and European countries. The money is then funneled back to a transnational security organization. The ultimate goal is to perpetuate an ongoing war, rather than achieving success.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Because the goal is not to completely subjugate Afghanistan. The goal is to use Afghanistan to wash money out of the tax bases of the United States, out of the tax bases of European countries through Afghanistan and back into the hands of a transnational our security office. That is the goal. I e, the goal is to have an endless war, not a successful
mfphhh
Posted - September 30, 2023 at 9:30 PM
Saved - October 1, 2023 at 5:19 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Elon Musk's involvement in anti-refugee sentiments and interference in US and German politics raises concerns. He supports right-wing Republicans' call to shut down the US government if it continues to aid Ukraine. Musk cites a refugee invasion as a reason to prioritize self-defense over supporting other nations. These actions align with a Russian strategy to destabilize governments through disinformation campaigns and a refugee crisis. The danger lies in the potential rise of far-right authoritarian regimes that disregard democracy and human rights. Musk's participation in this propaganda campaign raises questions about his motives. It is crucial to address the influence of powerful individuals like Musk and protect civil rights from their manipulation.

@mfphhh - Pedro

Why Elon Musk is agitating against refugees, wants to undermine financial and military support for Ukraine, and thus tries to influence US & German domestic politics? An explanatory model for this dangerous development: 🧵 1 /18

@mfphhh - Pedro

What happened. Musk is actively interfering in the U.S. budget debate, supporting call by some right-wing Republicans to force a shutdown of the U.S. government if it continues to support Ukraine. This comes amid a series of remarks Musk has made against supporting Ukraine. 2/18

@mfphhh - Pedro

As an argument against supporting Ukraine, Musk cites an alleged "invasion" of refugees against which the U.S. must first defend itself before supporting other countries. He thus deliberately triggers a far-right agenda. 3/18

@mfphhh - Pedro

Musk posted a 15-minute video from a Texas border crossing claiming that the U.S. is being overrun by dangerous immigrants (mentioning alleged murderers entering the U.S.) due to the Biden administration's alleged "open door policy." But do these claims match the facts? 4/18

@mfphhh - Pedro

In fact, Biden sought to reduce incentives for illegal border crossings by cracking down more on illegal border crossings and making orderly, legal entry easier to a small degree. Here's the background: 5/18 https://www.cfr.org/article/bidens-new-southern-border-plan-might-just-work

Biden’s New Southern Border Plan Might Just Work The balance of loathing from the left and right suggests the administration is on the right path. cfr.org

@mfphhh - Pedro

It didn't stop there. Musk also jumped on the European refugee debate by circulating a far-right Italian tweet claiming the German government was funding rescue ships in the Mediterranean and promoting far-right German party AfD, that is backed by Kremlin. 6/18

@mfphhh - Pedro

In response to German Foreign Ministry's brief comment that these rescue ships are saving lives -as required by international law- Musk continued to ramble on about an "invasion" which was not wanted by the German people and therefore German gov should be voted out of office 7/18

@mfphhh - Pedro

Where does this focus Musk has on immigration and purposeful interference in U.S. and German domestic politics come from? And how is this related to his call to end financial and military support for Ukraine? 8/18

@mfphhh - Pedro

We know from the Discord leaks published in April that Russia plans to conduct massive disinformation campaigns this fall against Ukraine's main supporting countries: USA and Germany. To destabilize their governments. One main propaganda narrative: "threat of refugees". 9/18

@mfphhh - Pedro

Behind this is a Russian strategy, which US and British strategists like @KeirGiles call "Polycrisis". First to destabilize Africa via food shortages and Wagner Group supported coups, and then to destabilize Europe with a refugee crisis. 10/18

@mfphhh - Pedro

@KeirGiles An artificially amplified cascade of crises in the West, at the end of which far-right, authoritarian governments will come to power, who abolish democracy and human rights. And thus function as more suitable "partners" for Russia's and China's regimes. 11/18

@mfphhh - Pedro

@KeirGiles But why is Musk actively participating in this Russian propaganda campaign? Speculation: a Western elite of super-rich like Musk have grown tired of democracy, the rule of law, and human rights. Things they call “bureaucracy" that restrict their freedom and power too much. 12/18

@mfphhh - Pedro

@KeirGiles What it means for us: People like Musk don't give a damn about workers' rights, occupational safety and environmental standards. As this investigation worth seeing shows, abysmal safety standards prevail at the sealed-off Tesla plant in Grünheide/GER 13/18 https://www.rtl.de/cms/stern-investigativ-bei-rtl-recherche-in-tesla-werk-auffaellig-viele-unfaelle-in-gruenheide-5061137.html

„stern Investigativ“ bei RTL: Recherche in Tesla-Werk - Auffällig viele Unfälle in Grünheide Das neue Format „stern Investigativ“ enthüllt heute um 22:35 Uhr bei RTL, was im Tesla-Werk in Berlin eigentlich los ist... rtl.de

@mfphhh - Pedro

@KeirGiles Any other company in Germany would get into serious trouble with occupational safety authorities and trade unions if serious accidents happened there so often. But the investigation shows that in Musk's case, German authorities and politicians are reluctant to take action. 14/18 https://t.co/sWiURt2cRb

@mfphhh - Pedro

@KeirGiles So it mean for us: We are in danger of losing long-fought civil rights if brutal billionaires and Russian influence bring easily bribable and controllable but unscrupulous populist parties to power, like in Germany the AfD or a future Wagenknecht party to power. 15/18

@mfphhh - Pedro

@KeirGiles And we now also see how the war in Ukraine directly affects us in the US and Europe. The same principles are at stake: A brutal “law of the jungle” shall be established in Ukraine and here, which undermines international law, human rights and democracy. 16/18

@mfphhh - Pedro

@KeirGiles The development is very dangerous. How long do we want to stand by and watch? If the U.S. does not succeed in containing players like Musk (in the past, there were effective breakups of too powerful corporations in the U.S.), we in Europe must at least draw a red line. 17/18

@mfphhh - Pedro

@KeirGiles It is unacceptable that the owner of a platform like Twitter -which is also important for European debates- uses misinformation and agitation to make "election recommendations" for European countries. We need enforcement of European law. Or alternative European platforms 18/18

CultureWar2021
Posted - October 2, 2023 at 12:25 AM
Saved - October 5, 2023 at 5:25 PM

@CultureWar2021 - Culture War Report

Julian Assange... “The goal is to use Ukraine to wash money out of the US and Europe through #Ukraine and back into the hands of of a transnational elite (BlackRock)." "The goal is an endless war, not a successful war” #JulianAssange #ukraineWar

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker explains that the objective is not to conquer Afghanistan, but rather to use it as a means to move money from the tax systems of the United States and European countries into the hands of a transnational security alliance. This is done by continuously engaging in war, rather than aiming for a victorious outcome.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Because the goal is not to completely subjugate Afghanistan. The goal is to use Afghanistan to wash money out of the tax basis of the United States, out of the tax basis of European countries, through out of sand and back into the hands of a transnational security alliance. That is the goal, I e the goal is to have an endless war, not a successful
DavidSacks
Posted - November 4, 2023 at 3:49 AM
Saved - November 5, 2023 at 2:25 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The conversation highlights doubts about the media's credibility regarding Ukraine's counteroffensive. @DavidSacks questions the media's misleading information, and @elonmusk wonders why the public was consistently deceived, possibly with government involvement. @TheChiefNerd suggests that the media relied on talking points from intelligence agencies.

@DavidSacks - David Sacks

Another remarkable confessional by the MSM in which we learn that everything we were told over the last 5 months about Ukraine making progress in its Counteroffensive was a lie.

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

@DavidSacks The question that I have is why did the media lie to the public so regularly and consistently, aided and abetted by many arms of our government?

@TheChiefNerd - Chief Nerd

@elonmusk @DavidSacks They were just reading the talking points from the intel agencies.

ShadowofEzra
Posted - November 8, 2023 at 6:52 PM
Saved - November 9, 2023 at 12:19 AM

@ShadowofEzra - Shadow of Ezra

“The goal is to use Ukraine to wash money out of the US and Europe through Ukraine and back into the hands of of a transnational elite (BlackRock). The goal is an endless war, not a successful war" - Julian Assange (The Source) https://t.co/gy9URR8lrI

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker explains that the objective is not to conquer Afghanistan, but rather to use it as a means to launder money from the tax systems of the United States and European countries. The money is then funneled back to a transnational security alliance, specifically the international security organization. In other words, the goal is to perpetuate an ongoing war rather than achieve a victorious outcome.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Because the goal is not to completely subjugate Afghanistan. The goal is to use Afghanistan to wash money out of the tax bases of the United States, out of the tax bases of European countries through Afghanistan and back into the hands of a transnational security alliance. That is the goal, I. E, the international security on it. That is the goal. I e, the goal is to have an endless war, not a successful
GrahamAllen_1
Posted - November 27, 2023 at 11:02 PM
Saved - November 28, 2023 at 3:29 PM

@GrahamAllen_1 - Graham Allen

"There's no choice but to kill those who insist on murdering civilians. There’s no choice. They’re not going to change their mind.” - Elon Musk Well said @elonmusk. https://t.co/JHzv1iAlNf

Video Transcript AI Summary
Today was an emotionally difficult day as I visited the places where people were murdered. During my talk with the prime minister, we discussed the three necessary steps for the situation in Gaza. Firstly, we must take action against those who continue to kill innocent civilians. Secondly, we need to reform the education system to prevent the training of future murderers. Lastly, it is crucial to focus on building prosperity in the region. These three actions are essential for addressing the challenges we face.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It was, suddenly been, a day I would say an emotionally difficult day, to see the places where people were murdered. I just did a talk with the prime minister and, I think there's, I mean, obviously there are 3 things that need to happen, in Gaza situation. I mean, there's no choice but to kill those who insist on murdering civilians is our choice. They're not going to change their mind, But, and then the second thing is to change the education so that a new generation of murderers is not trained to be murderers. And then the and then the third thing which is also very important is to try to build prosperity.
bennyjohnson
Posted - November 29, 2023 at 11:58 PM
Saved - November 30, 2023 at 2:30 AM

@bennyjohnson - Benny Johnson

ELON MUSK: “What I see all over the place is people who care about looking good, while doing evil. Fuck them.” 🔥 https://t.co/EqUyl4zS7y

teslaownersSV
Posted - November 30, 2023 at 4:09 AM
Saved - November 30, 2023 at 8:53 AM

@teslaownersSV - Tesla Owners Silicon Valley

“All over the place I’m seeing people trying to look good when in reality their doing evil, F*** them” Elon Musk https://t.co/VBLLcQRPh2

ShadowofEzra
Posted - June 19, 2024 at 1:19 AM
Saved - June 19, 2024 at 4:15 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Elon Musk's father, Errol Musk, warns about the Ukraine-Russia war, suggesting we've been misled to believe Ukraine is good and Russia is bad. He alleges that Ukraine possesses weaponized BioLabs and questions Joe Biden's control over the United States.

@ShadowofEzra - Shadow of Ezra

Elon Musk's father, Errol Musk, issued a startling warning about the Ukraine-Russia war, claiming we have all been brainwashed into thinking that Ukraine is good and Russia is bad. He also claimed that Ukraine has weaponized BioLabs and insists that Joe Biden is not truly in control of the United States of America. “We are being brainwashed to be told that Ukraine is good and Russia is bad, and yet they have found multiple bioweapon laboratories belonging to the United States in Ukraine.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker questions the portrayal of Ukraine as good and Russia as bad, mentioning US bioweapon labs in Ukraine. They find it odd that Ukraine's president is a former comedian. They suggest that President Biden is not in charge, and the US is run by revenge-seeking misfits.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We are being brainwashed to be told that, Ukraine is good and Russia is bad, and yet, they have found multiple bioweapon laboratories belonging to United States in Ukraine. The Ukraine is led by a stand up comedian who became president, which is extremely odd to me. I wish him good luck, but it's extremely odd to me. Then I would say if you look at Biden himself, he's obviously not running the United States. United States must be it appears to me is being run by a bunch of misfits who are getting revenge for having been treated as misfits over the years. That's what it appears to me to be. It has been run by a bunch of misfits who are getting revenge for being treated as misfits over the years in the United States.
MLiamMcCollum
Posted - September 16, 2024 at 3:50 AM
Saved - September 16, 2024 at 2:51 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I wrote a book titled “Ukraine’s Unwinnable War,” which my wife edited. It reflects on the brutal realities of war, including the atrocities I've witnessed and the moral dilemmas surrounding killing. I argue that while Ukraine cannot win alone, it is crucial for the world to support them. My experience in Ukraine, including leading a failed drone project, has shown me the complexities of this conflict. I believe we must unite globally to stop Russia and address Ukraine's internal corruption. The prolonged conflict has hindered Ukraine's chances for unity and victory.

@MLiamMcCollum - Liam McCollum

BREAKING: Ryan Routh wrote a book called “Ukraine’s Unwinnable War.” His wife is the editor. Here is the description on Amazon: “Roosters’ crow and here I sit at 5am; I shot a white rooster yesterday and they normally run off screaming, but this one was paralyzed and could no longer walk and was dragging itself along with its wings. . A short time later one of the Afghan soldier escapees sends me a video of a Taliban man who has stabbed a civilian and grabs him by the hair and proceeds to cut his neck sawing the knife back and forth with great effort to remove his head while the man’s arm is flailing back and forth in a weak attempt to defend himself. I did not have the stomach to even watch and fumbled as I tried to make it stop. My Afghan soldiers longing to escape being murdered send me countless videos and photos of the barbaric cruelty that I cannot even fathom. What value do we each put on the lives of life around us, and what atrocities can we justify? The Canadian sniper is hunkered down at his post and his two Ukrainian spotters insist on cigarette outside so the smoke does not bother the Canadian, against his advisement, and the brilliant glow of cigarettes finds the crosshairs of the Russian tanks cannon and body parts fly. Russians bum cigarettes from two Ukrainian civilians whose town they now own and shot them in the back as they walk away. How do we justify killing in any form? . I would think that the more civilized and progressive we get the more respect for life we would have. I would probably fall in the category of barbaric killer as I laugh about her and kill chickens in the same day. When is it acceptable to kill another human-being? I think that the vast majority of advanced civilized society would land on the side that killing a human is generally unacceptable. If we all are opposed to the unjust random killings of civilians how can we go about our daily lives and not act when thousands of our innocent neighbors or getting murdered by a terrorist like Putin, and how can we sit idle as genocide occurs in Afghanistan and Myanmar and other places around the globe. As the Taliban is committing genocide and killing the majority of the Afghan population; we have 5900 Afghan soldiers ready to deploy to Ukraine and we have 10,000 of the Syrian free army(less 67 killed in the earthquake last week) that Ukraine and the US refuses to allow and coordinate them to go and fight in Ukraine. After spending five months in Ukraine I began to realize that it was impossible for Ukraine to win this war and that the world should not have grand thoughts that it is possible. I presume that I must be clear, that while on the current path Ukraine will not win, it is imperative for the world that they do win, and that is why this book is so important, for us all to recognize that losing is not an option and what we must do to win. I obviously did not write this to make any money, as that is totally unimportant; the extremely important issue is that we openly discuss daily the major issues that face Ukraine and what we each must try to do to fix them. This is a conflict of global importance and the outcome will affect us each and every one for the rest of the world. It is tragic that we are too immature as leaders to be modest and humble and bend over backwards to forge relationships. If we are the world’s leader we must be able to set the example of how of unselfishness and kindness and caring and be able to sit in the dirt floor with the most common struggling souls among us and share their pain and try to make their lives better. There would be little need for any world news or any news outside of our own community if we all intend to do nothing. What is the point of even covering the story? They take the picture of the mother and child decapitate on the kitchen floor with the kids head on the kitchen table because it is not normal or acceptable and if we are not moved to act we must be heartless shells of humans.”

@MLiamMcCollum - Liam McCollum

Here are all the chapters of his book. Notably, “Why not Nuclear War” and “Ukraine cannot win- So the world must win the war!” https://t.co/UB1B74Z5Pa

@MLiamMcCollum - Liam McCollum

He believes the Ukraine war “should be a world war because it is not feasible for Ukraine to win this, nor is obligated.” https://t.co/D9F1iplNB7

@MLiamMcCollum - Liam McCollum

He explains briefly how he ended up in Ukraine, saying, “I have been instructed that some sort of background and backstory is required.” https://t.co/OTx81YQ4fP

@MLiamMcCollum - Liam McCollum

He claims to have been the “unofficial project manager” of a team if engineers from England, Azerbaijan, Iran, Ukraine, the US responsible for building drones for the Ukrainian army. https://t.co/bDQoKYbQkr

@MLiamMcCollum - Liam McCollum

Rouch’s drone project ultimately failed https://t.co/KBGpFQ8Dsc

@MLiamMcCollum - Liam McCollum

https://t.co/mA9ORHUCWl

@MLiamMcCollum - Liam McCollum

He believes the world invited Putin to invade Ukraine and is making the same mistake with Taiwan. https://t.co/f5rv7DfhFn

@MLiamMcCollum - Liam McCollum

He believes “we must, as a global military unit” stop Russia and also notes Ukraine’s corruption problems and concerns about the lack of accounting on international funds https://t.co/8t0Rv7YAfj

@MLiamMcCollum - Liam McCollum

He says, “Ukraine’s biggest blunder was to allow this conflict to last eight years” and that “it is inconceivable they will have the unity to ever win” https://t.co/KtN5cVOH5N

@MLiamMcCollum - Liam McCollum

He claims he did it all for free. Many Ukrainians asked him, “Who is paying you?” https://t.co/otMZJOR7kL

Megatron_ron
Posted - January 10, 2025 at 3:34 PM
Saved - January 11, 2025 at 5:12 AM

@Megatron_ron - Megatron

NEW: 🇺🇸🇮🇱Elon Musk has confirmed he serves Israel: "We have no choice but to eliminate the people who would oppose the state of Israel." He said this in the interview with the German AfD leader. https://t.co/uV7pcEwGsN

ri_not_ri
Posted - February 17, 2025 at 10:46 PM
Saved - February 19, 2025 at 3:01 PM

@ri_not_ri - Rinat

It seems to me that Elon Musk doesn't quite realize that by making enemies among Ukrainians, he risks living looking over his shoulder for the rest of his life. https://t.co/6QN2mg1Nrc

WallStreetApes
Posted - February 19, 2025 at 6:34 PM
Saved - February 20, 2025 at 5:07 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Elon Musk has stated that US politicians are receiving kickbacks from Ukraine funding, echoing Matt Gaetz's claims that the Ukraine War serves as a means to launder money. Gaetz argues that the involvement in Ukraine is excessive, especially since the Afghanistan conflict has wound down. He suggests that defense contractors are pushing for a prolonged conflict to facilitate ongoing financial transactions and unaccountable spending. The narrative emphasizes that American wars are becoming vehicles for long-term money laundering, with politicians benefiting from lobbyists and scams.

@WallStreetApes - Wall Street Apes

It’s official: Elon Musk says US politicians are receiving “kickbacks” from Ukraine funding Matt Gaetz said the exact same thing. The Ukraine War is “to launder money through” Congress reps are literally, STEALING YOUR MONEY disguised as ‘war funding’ Matt Gaetz “I think that the reason we are as involved in Ukraine as we are is because Afghanistan wound down. If we still had Afghanistan to launder money through, there probably wouldn't be the need for this type of excessive involvement in Ukraine. But I think we can look at Afghanistan and we can look at what's going on here and say, what a lot of these defense contractors are pushing toward is how to have an extended kind of low yield war. Like if there's a way to stretch this thing out, turn it into a 20, 30 year kind of thing where there's a whole lot of money moving around and unaccountable pots and a lot of weapons getting bought and then all man the stockpiles well we got to spend more money to reload those” American Wars are looking for Longterm Unaccountable Money Laundering US Politicians take their kickbacks from their lobbyist and through scams like FTX to keep the taxpayer money laundering going

Video Transcript AI Summary
The heavy involvement in Ukraine is likely due to the end of the Afghanistan war. If Afghanistan were still ongoing, the need for such extensive involvement in Ukraine might not exist. Many defense contractors seem to be pushing for extended, low-yield wars. The goal appears to be stretching conflicts out for twenty to thirty years to keep money flowing through unaccountable sources. This approach involves purchasing weapons, depleting stockpiles, and then requesting more funds to replenish them, creating a cycle of continuous spending.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I think that the reason we are as involved in Ukraine as we are is because Afghanistan wound down. And if we still had Afghanistan to launder money through, there probably wouldn't be the need for this type of excessive involvement in Ukraine. But I think we can look at Afghanistan and we can look at what's going on here and say, what a lot of these defense contractors are pushing toward is how to have an extended low yield war. Like if there's a way to stretch this thing out, turn it into a twenty, thirty year kind of thing where there's a whole lot of money moving around and unaccountable pots and a lot of weapons getting bought and then, oh man, the stockpiles, well we got to spend more money to reload those.
VigilantFox
Posted - February 20, 2025 at 2:33 AM
Saved - February 20, 2025 at 12:00 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Elon Musk shared a heartfelt message urging wealthy individuals to rekindle their love for America. He emphasized that their prosperity is tied to the nation's stability, warning that if America falters, their businesses will suffer too. Musk stressed that America is a crucial support for Western civilization, and if it weakens, the consequences will be dire for everyone. He called for a collective responsibility to ensure the strength of the country, highlighting that there is no safe haven if America collapses.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

NEW: Elon Musk delivers an emotional message to the rich people who have lost their love for America. “There’s a lot of rich people out there. They should be caring more about the country because the reason they should be caring more about the country is if America falls.” “What do you think’s gonna happen to your business? What do you think? Do you think you’re gonna be okay if the ship of America sinks?” “If America is the central pillar holding up Western civilization, that pillar must be strong. If that pillar falls, the whole roof comes crashing down… there’s no place to run.”

elonmusk
Posted - February 21, 2025 at 5:22 PM
Saved - February 22, 2025 at 12:55 PM

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

Russia went too far 3 years ago, now the Ukrainian government has gone too far. Endless death in trenches is wrong and anyone who continues to push that lacks both empathy and a brain.

@AlexandruC4 - AlexandruC4

Wtf happened to him in the last 3 years? https://t.co/hGi9FBUVkb

WesternLensman
Posted - March 1, 2025 at 1:38 PM
Saved - March 2, 2025 at 1:19 AM

@WesternLensman - Western Lensman

Zelenskyy: If someone wants to "check" on the billions sent to Ukraine "we are very, very open with it." Elon: Challenge accepted. https://t.co/fFvtrODIec

Video Transcript AI Summary
Regarding military equipment, while documents show significant aid, the reality is different. Out of the supposed $183 billion from the US over three years, $67 billion arrived as weapons, checked and verified, a process shared with the American side. Additionally, $31.5 billion was direct financial support to the budget. This is all transparent, digitized, and accessible. We encourage anyone to review it. We maintain complete openness.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Military equipment. No. It's it's can't be so. 100 billions we have got during three years. Hundred and eighty three from The US. Now on on the paper, in the documents, yes. But we have, in fact, because 67 came like a weapon. It came through the border. It's checked and it's fixed by every everybody and we can we go we shared it not once with with the American side and SOTI one point five. It was direct financial support to the budget. Again, it's very open. It digitalized. It's open free and please. If if somebody want to check it again, we are very very open with Last last thing.
elonmusk
Posted - March 3, 2025 at 5:55 PM
Saved - March 3, 2025 at 9:52 PM

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

Zelensky wants a forever war, a never-ending graft meat grinder. This is evil.

@RapidResponse47 - Rapid Response 47

https://t.co/IUAW4TU7IQ

BGatesIsaPyscho
Posted - April 6, 2025 at 8:34 AM
Saved - April 7, 2025 at 12:13 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m alarmed by the increasing violence in Europe, which I believe will lead to widespread slaughter. The media seems to downplay these attacks, but the trend is clear, and I feel we’re witnessing a significant rise in these incidents, as Elon Musk has warned.

@BGatesIsaPyscho - Concerned Citizen

🚨 “Eventually you will see widespread slaughter in Europe” “The trend leads to the widespread slaughter of Europe” “You are seeing a massive increase in the number of attacks in Europe - the Legacy Media downplays these attacks” Elon Musk with a bone chilling warning for the whole of Europe - you can already see it happening in real time.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Attacks are massively increasing in Italy and Europe, but the legacy media downplays them. The terrorism and killing of innocent people is rising every week. If the rate of terrorist attacks in Europe is extrapolated on a graph of deadly attacks versus time, the trend leads to the slaughter of Europe.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I mean, you're clearly seeing a massive increase in the number of attacks, in Italy and broadly in Europe. And the media the legacy media downplays these attacks. But the the attacks, the terrorism, the killing of innocent people is rising. Every week, there's more. And it and it's more and more. And and eventually, I think we're going to see widespread slaughter in Europe. That is the trend. If you simply extrapolate the trend of how of what is the rate at which the terrorist attacks are occurring in Europe and and put those points it's basically deadly attacks versus time on a graph and extrapolate that graph, it leads to the slaughter of Europe.
teslaownersSV
Posted - April 8, 2025 at 5:36 AM
Saved - April 8, 2025 at 4:42 PM

@teslaownersSV - Tesla Owners Silicon Valley

Elon Musk “They basically want to kill me because I'm stopping their fraud. And they want to hurt Tesla because we're stopping this terrible waste and corruption in the government. I guess they're bad people and bad people will do bad things." https://t.co/8xYKEvve6R

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 suggests Speaker 1 is aligned with President Trump and has identified over $100 billion in government waste, fraud, and abuse. Speaker 1 responds that people whose fraudulent money is taken away get upset and want to harm him and Tesla because he is stopping government corruption. He attributes this to "bad people" doing "bad things." Speaker 0 expresses concern that those hurt by these actions will be dealership employees and Tesla factory workers, which he finds despicable due to perceived political differences.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Countries. You're working on helping the blind see and all of these other things. Is it really is it really come down to the basic you're aligned with president Donald Trump, who also is a friend of mine, and that you have identified well over a hundred billion dollars of waste, fraud, abuse that our federal government never should have been spending. Is that what it comes down to? Speaker 1: Yeah. It's it turns out, when you take away people's, you know, what the fraud the money they're receiving, fraudulently, they get very upset. And they they basically wanna kill me because I'm stopping their fraud. And they wanna hurt Tesla because we're stopping this this terrible waste and and corruption in the government. And, well, I guess they're bad people. Bad people will do bad things. Speaker 0: Well, I I I know that overall, you know, financially, in the end, yes, they can hurt you, but the people that they'll end up hurting are the people that work in your dealerships that may risk losing their job. The people that they may end up hurting are the people that work on the line and build the Teslas. They're gonna be Speaker 1: the ones hurt, Speaker 0: and and that that to me is despicable on their part just because they might have a political difference or perceived political difference. Let me let me
Alex_Oloyede2
Posted - August 24, 2025 at 9:47 PM
Saved - August 31, 2025 at 2:04 PM

@Alex_Oloyede2 - Spetsnaℤ 007 🇷🇺

🇷🇺🇺🇦 My perspective on current situations; Sorry to all those hoping for a peace deal but this conflict ends with the seige of Kiev. Zelensky says Ukraine won't compromise even after losing 20% of territory and 1.7mil men. Till the very last Ukrainian as they say, what a waste. https://t.co/jY58GOm3bR

Video Transcript AI Summary
Alex argues Zelensky's statement—'Ukraine will never be what, pushed to disgrace or shame by compromising itself'—signals a commitment to continue the conflict. He notes Zelensky previously told Trump he was 'going to look for peace, he was willing for compromise' and discussed 'possibly freezing the front lines,' but now rejects any ceasefire. He questions what Russia would have to compromise on and asserts 'This conflict does not end without Russia taking back Odessa, it doesn't end without Russia seizing the whole Eastern Ukraine, it doesn't end without Kyiv signing an agreement of neutrality, no NATO.' He contrasts Ukraine's stance with discussions of war and warns the West. He mentions Trump may 'sell some weapons to Ukraine possibly in a few weeks' and cites Ukraine threatening Hungary: 'Zelenskyy is not in charge of Hungary's matters.' He adds 'This conflict does not end with peace.'
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So hey, guys. It's Alex. Fuck. Well, congratulations to the Ukrainian on happy, independent state or whatever they call that. Basically, just going from a neutral country to, like, what, an EU US vassal. Congratulations to them, I guess. Now I wanted to discuss what Zelensky actually said today, where he said, Ukraine will never be what, pushed to disgrace or shame by compromising itself. What does he mean by that? He literally saying he's going to continue the conflict no matter what even happened just a week ago where he told president Trump of The United States that he was going to look for peace, he was willing for compromise, He was talking about possibly freezing the front lines. He he already scrubbed the idea of a ceasefire, and now today he said Ukraine is never going to be put to shame in Russia's compromise. I don't understand what the Ukrainians exactly wants Russia to compromise on. When does the victor exactly compromise on anything? I mean, we are doing them a big favor by not turning them into what? Iraq, Afghanistan, Vietnam. What are they talking about? If they want to compare war, they can literally compare Gaza right now. This is not a war, this is a special military operation, and I don't understand exactly what they want Russia to compromise on. If they don't want to sign the paper agreement, then what does Putin have to be nice all about for? We could literally turn this into a war and go in and do whatever we want to do without consequences. I explained to the Ukrainian people sometimes if they're listening, I don't know if they listen to me, you can't win this. I don't understand exactly what you're fighting for. Yeah. They go ahead and Zelensky says he's not going to compromise on anything. He's not going to freeze the front lines. Donbas, Donetsk, Lugansko, Crimea, everything is Ukrainian. I mean these people are so tired, there's no going there's going to be no peace with Russia. They don't want peace with Russia. It's going to be an endless conflict. There's nothing even what Trump said just a week ago, he still sold some weapons, he's going to sell some weapons to Ukraine possibly in a few weeks coming probably six weeks from now he's going to sell them a few hundreds or thousands of missiles, US built missiles to kill Russians. You you see, I don't understand. I mean, we go back and forth on this thing where we think, oh, Trump is gonna do something, then we go through this phase that he's giving Ukraine weapons again, then we come back that we want peace again and it's just back and forth. This conflict does not end without Russia taking back Odessa, it doesn't end without Russia seizing the whole Eastern Ukraine, it doesn't end without Kyiv signing an agreement of neutrality, no NATO. I don't know if later on on the line we decide they can join the European Union. I mean it's already a dead Union, so they can have at it. And I wanted to also discuss recently Ukraine threatening Hungary where I just saw a post recently from one of the Ukrainian parliament leaders where he said Zelenskyy is not in charge of Hungary's matters. They can go cry to Russia. What's going on? When did Ukraine ever have the guts to say something like that? You're literally threatening a fellow, not a fellow, you're not NATO country. I don't know why you're threatening a NATO country over its energy security. You're literally telling them to commit suicide because my problem is your problem and my war is your war. What type of logic is that? It makes no sense. You can see Germany as an example such terrible economy at the moment. Russia is the largest economy in Germany at the moment. So yeah, it's basically the same way. It's just oh I just don't understand this Ukrainian perspective exactly. It's it's stupid, like, real dumb. And I mean, yeah, they can go ahead. No compromise. Nothing. Then we start striking targets across Ukraine, and they start crying war crimes, war crimes. We're killing their people, genocide. If they want to see genocide, they should go to Gaza and see genocide. But yeah, Russia's going to strike something now, one person dies and they start crying genocide. I mean, I don't even know what to say anymore. But yeah, basically, it's past five minutes. I've been ranting for so long. I just wanted to share with you guys my perspective. This conflict does not end with peace. It's it's still going to go on for some few times, even if Putin's landscape possibly meets, it's not going to end anything because none of them understand the true roots like Putin says, roots of the conflict. They don't understand the concepts. They don't even care about the people of Ukraine. So, what's the point of disagreements with them if they're still going to push on with this idea? Yeah, basically so I just wanted to share with you guys. So,
View Full Interactive Feed