reSee.it - Related Post Feed

@shellenberger - Michael Shellenberger

Your bill is a heinous attack on the privacy rights of citizens around the world. It is grotesque that you are hiding your totalitarian power grab behind “protecting children.” We see what you are doing. The whole world is watching.

@DamianCollins - Damian Collins

This is a complete scare story from @WhatsApp - The #OnlineSafetyBill does not require companies to remove end to end encryption of messages. But they must share with the authorities evidence of illegal activity which they can see. My comments here - https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2023/may/08/whatsapp-could-disappear-uk-over-privacy-concerns-ministers-told?CMP=share_btn_tw

WhatsApp could disappear from UK over privacy concerns, ministers told ‘Intentional ambiguity’ over end-to-end encryption in online safety bill could lead to messaging app being withdrawn theguardian.com

@shellenberger - Michael Shellenberger

“Cybersecurity experts agree the U.K. bill’s demands are incompatible with a desire to protect encryption. They claim that privacy is not a fungible issue — services either have it or they don’t.” https://www.politico.eu/article/uk-ministers-lock-horns-with-whatsapp-over-threat-to-break-encryption/

UK locks horns with WhatsApp over threat to break encryption Encrypted messaging services say they’d rather quit Britain than bust privacy features as part of new bill. politico.eu

@shellenberger - Michael Shellenberger

This person, British MP @DamianCollins is part of the global crackdown by elites on free speech. Here is he all the way back in 2018 at a US press conference with the pro-censorship “think tank” @AtlanticCouncil Today, he’s demanding to read your text messages. Creepy and wrong

@shellenberger - Michael Shellenberger

These guys are absolutely desperate to read your text messages. Their demands are so outrageous that even Facebook, which censors accurate content on vaccines and Ukraine, and hired as a top censor a former @AtlanticCouncil exec., is standing up to them.

@shellenberger - Michael Shellenberger

These people want to be able to read and censor your private text messages. This seminar is part of a well-funded influence operation to brainwash the public into accepting totalitarianism. I’ll be attending their propaganda session and hope other defenders of freedom will too.

@DFRLab - DFRLab

TUESDAY | MAY 30 Join @DFRLab for a discussion on Telegram, WeChat, and WhatsApp usage in the US and how mis- and disinformation narratives spread on messaging apps. Ft. @NSC, @robertfabricant, Connie Moon Sehat, @Riana_Crypto, and Wafa Ben-Hassine. RSVP:https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/event/messaging-app-usage-in-the-united-states/

Telegram, WeChat, and WhatsApp usage in the United States DFRLab launches a new report on how people in the United States use messaging apps and how platforms enforce policies on harmful content. atlanticcouncil.org

@shellenberger - Michael Shellenberger

MP @DamianCollins wants Britain to follow the lead of Brazil, which is seeking out excuses to ban encrypted private messaging services like Telegram. This is their playbook. They are working together in a global push for totalitarian censorship. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/04/26/briefing/brazil-telegram-ban.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare

Brazilian Judge Bans Telegram App Amid School Attacks Inquiry The Federal Police requested the app’s suspension because it failed to provide complete user data from two group chats that the authorities said had inspired an attack. nytimes.com

@iluminatibot - illuminatibot

SURVEILLANCE - Listen carefully to the CEO of Signal explain the depth of the Online harms bill Ofcom and the WEF have specified. It would mean Ofcom has the power to force all UK citizens to download Spyware that checks their messages before they are sent against a database of what is permissible to say

@EvaVlaar - Eva Vlaardingerbroek

BREAKING | The European digital surveillance state is around the corner. We need to resist much and obey little. Now. 🚨👇🏻 A few hours ago, the European Parliament and the Council came to an agreement on the European Digital Identity #eID. Unless it miraculously gets voted out in the plenary (which is highly unlikely) it will come in effect soon and everyone living in the EU will soon have a digital wallet. But do not be fooled: This ‘digital wallet’ will be much more than just your passport in a digital form. It will entail EVERYTHING the government wants to know about you. It will hold all of your personal information, biometric data, medical records and of course soon also your Digital Euro (Central Bank Digital Currency) that is currently being developed. Just like we’ve seen with covid, the government will have the power to track your every move. And of course, it’s all “voluntary” for now. Until it’s not. In fact, numerous academics and privacy experts have warned last week that with the legal framework that’s now been agreed upon, any European government will be able to surveil and spy on both their own citizens AND residents across the EU by providing them with the technical means to intercept encrypted web traffic. This will mean no less than the end of our privacy. In other words, we’re already in deep trouble. The only way I see how we can stop this is if we all - en masse - reject the Digital Identity. Simply do not use it. Do not comply. Do not go along. Write your MEPs that you want them to vote against this. Let @ThierryBreton know that you won’t become a slave to his digital prison. The hour to resist much and obey little is now! Links to sources: The EU’s digital strategy: https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/electronic-identification Legal framework for the #eID: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52021PC0281) Open letter signed by over 500 cyber security experts, researchers and NGOs who are sounding the alarm: https://last-chance-for-eidas.org

Electronic Identification Electronic identification (eID) is one of the tools to ensure secure access to online services and to carry out electronic transactions in a safer way. digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu

Page Not Found - EUR-Lex eur-lex.europa.eu

Last Chance to fix eIDAS EU law agreed behind closed doors threatens Internet security last-chance-for-eidas.org

@Snowden - Edward Snowden

EU apparatchiks aim to sneak a terrifying mass surveillance measure into law despite UNIVERSAL public opposition (no thinking person wants this) by INVENTING A NEW WORD for it—"upload moderation"—and hoping no one learns what it means until it's too late. Stop them, Europe!

@mer__edith - Meredith Whittaker

📣Official statement: the new EU chat controls proposal for mass scanning is the same old surveillance with new branding. Whether you call it a backdoor, a front door, or “upload moderation” it undermines encryption & creates significant vulnerabilities https://signal.org/blog/pdfs/upload-moderation.pdf https://t.co/3L1hqbBRgq

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/1🚨🗣️EXCLUSIVE — FOREIGN COLLUSION TO CENSOR AMERICAN SPEECH: New docs from litigation against the CDC reveal the Biden-Harris White House hosted the “Counter Disinformation Unit” from the U.K. gov’t in 2021 to learn about their recommendations to censor speech. 🧵THREAD:

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/2 As a part of the NSC’s regular interagency meetings on censoring COVID-related speech in the United States, the White House hosted the Counter Disinformation Unit (CDU) from the U.K. government in 2021 to learn about their most effective censorship techniques.

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/3 This meeting was attended by high-level staff from: 🚨White House 🚨NSC 🚨CIA 🚨FBI 🚨State Department 🚨Treasury 🚨Department of Defense 🚨Homeland Security 🚨Health and Human Services 🚨USAID 🚨Global Media 🚨Office of the Director of National Intelligence as well as high-ranking officers in the Army, Navy, and Air Force.

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/4 At this meeting, the CDU outlined how they have been censoring the British public, and these documents expose how left-wing authoritarian governments across the globe are working together to attack free speech.

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/5 During the censorship meeting, the Biden-Harris NSC invited the British government to share its censorship playbook. They recommended: 🚨Creating a dedicated hub to lead government-wide censorship efforts 🚨Passing legislation to enable the government to coerce social media companies 🚨Enlisting the Department of State to partner with foreign allies and multilateral institutions to coordinate the global censorship agenda Keep reading…

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/6🚨A centralized hub to lead government-wide censorship efforts:   The Counter Disinformation Unit (CDU) is a British “cross-departmental” body that coordinates censorship programs across the whole of the British government. They “support formulation of a coordinated Government response” to the “threat” of misinformation (anything the government deems false).

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/7 The CDU coordinates the British censorship program with private companies such as social media platforms and non-profits. The CDU includes components of the U.K.’s foreign policy apparatus, domestic and foreign intelligence services, and individuals working directly for the Prime Minister in the Cabinet Office’s National Security Unit.

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/8 Our separate litigation previously uncovered that the Biden-Harris Admin convened similar public-private censorship partnerships in the U.S. well into 2024.

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/9 Around election time, the CDU stood up a “Central Election Cell” to kick censorship efforts into overdrive.

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/10 During the U.S. 2022 Midterm elections, the Biden-Harris Administration similarly set up a National Election Command Post within the FBI.

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/1🚨FBI SURVEILLANCE EXPOSED: Our lawsuit just exposed that the FBI implemented extensive nationwide social media monitoring ahead of the 2022 midterm elections. The FBI’s National Election Command Post received lists of “multiple Twitter accounts posting misinformation.” 🧵

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/11🚨Enacting censorship laws In the meeting, the CDU shared how their proposal would allow them to directly coerce social media platforms to ensure that the government’s censorship demands were followed. By creating a new duty of care, the proposed legislation empowers a British regulatory agency to demand the censorship of content that the U.K. government deems harmful.

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/12 The U.K. Online Safety Act came into force in October of 2023 and is the basis under which U.K. law enforcement officials have threatened to extradite and jail U.S. citizens.

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/13 The law parallels recently resurfaced comments made by then Senator Kamala Harris in 2019, which called for the DOJ to punish social media companies that allowed “disinformation” and “misinformation.”

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/14 One of our separate investigations confirmed that the Biden-Harris White House solicited policy recommendations from the British-based Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH)—the group behind the U.K. Online Safety Act—and adopted commitments to hold companies accountable through DOJ prosecutions and FTC enforcement actions for allowing “online harassment” on their platforms.

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/1🚨CENSORSHIP SCANDAL EXPOSED — We just unearthed evidence that Biden’s DHS and State Dept. mobilized federal counterterrorism assets to support a foreign-based organization censoring American speech: the Center for Countering Digital Hate. THREAD:

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/15🚨Establish regular lines of communication between government and social media platforms The CDU also relies heavily on “trusted flagging relationships.” Effectively, this means when the government directs social media companies to censor specific posts and individuals. This behavior of flagging posts led us to initially file the lawsuit, which resulted in the production of these documents and is at the heart of the Missouri v. Biden case, in which we filed two key Amicus Briefs on behalf of dozens of members in the House of Representatives.

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/16 Prior doc releases we obtained in this litigation revealed that the Biden-Harris admin had also engaged in this sort of “trusted relationship” partnership with social media companies even before this meeting. 

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/17🚨International government pressure The presentation appears to show that the U.K. government engages its foreign policy apparatus to further its censorship agenda and encouraged the U.S. to do the same. One of the so-called “significant benefits” of this approach would be, according to the presentation, that this unified front of government pressure would “encourag[e] cooperation from platforms.”

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/18 The U.K. Foreign Office and the U.S. Department of State appear to play important similar roles in this international government censorship partnership. By coordinating across left-wing authoritarian governments, they can manipulate the global population into believing that there is no alternative to massive government censorship of social media, and “industry” would “efficiently implement[] new systems and processes.” In 2021, the U.K. boasted of a close working relationship with the U.S., Australia, and Canada, as well as bilateral relationships with 20 additional countries. This begs the question: how many nations have come on board with this initiative by now?

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/19 The CDU presentation also highlights the role of multilateral institutions in this international engagement, specifically identifying the G7’s Rapid Response Mechanism and the United Nations Interagency Platform on Culture for Sustainable Development (IPCSD) under the heading: “Multilateral cooperation to counter disinformation.” The logos of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), the International Criminal Court (ICC), and the European Center for Excellence of Countering Threats are visible under the heading, “International training and capability.”

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/20🚨Promote leftist dogma Part of the U.K. government’s presentation included a description of a U.K. initiative called the “Counter Disinformation and Media Development Programme,” which was active in Eastern Europe from 2016 to 2021. According to their “Theory of Change,” one of the outcomes of this scheme was that the targeted populations would “reduce identification with pre-existing social biases” and increase “support for gender equality” and “liberal democratic values.”

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/21 These terms may sound innocuous, but in practice, they are covers for left-wing social re-engineering experiments. For instance, money from the CDMD Programme was used to fund the “Global Disinformation Index,” which runs an “advertising blacklist” for websites that they allege push “anti-trans narratives.”

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/22 These slides expose the Biden-Harris Administration’s cooperation with ideologically aligned leftist allies to push woke progressive dogmas while monitoring and censoring what Americans think and say.

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/23 This release comes on the heels of calls from House Cybersecurity Subcommittee Chairwoman, @RepNancyMace, to ensure that the 2024 election is protected from the deep state censorship that was prevalent in the 2020 election.

@GOPoversight - Oversight Committee

🚨BREAKING: Rep. Nancy Mace is calling on President Joe Biden and VP Kamala Harris to provide all White House communications with social media companies and between federal employees about efforts to pressure social media platforms to censor online content. @RepNancyMace

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

@RepNancyMace /24 Find the full slide deck linked at the bottom of our release here: https://aflegal.org/exclusive-america-first-legal-obtains-new-internal-cdc-documents-revealing-foreign-collusion-in-biden-harris-government-censorship-regime/

EXCLUSIVE – America First Legal Obtains New Internal CDC Documents Revealing Foreign Collusion in Biden-Harris Government Censorship Regime WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, America First Legal released new documents exclusively obtained in its litigation against the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). AFL […] aflegal.org

@myhiddenvalue - Not A Number

Apple is going too far..... https://t.co/dDctAUhAl6

@sayerjigmi - Sayer Ji

🚨 BREAKING: The UK Just Ordered Apple to Kill Encryption for 2 Billion People—And They Can’t Even Talk About It 🚨 A global privacy nightmare is unfolding. The UK government secretly ordered Apple to backdoor encrypted iCloud storage worldwide—but Apple is legally forbidden from revealing this order, or they face criminal charges. This affects 2 BILLION USERS. Here’s the full story & why it’s part of a much bigger power grab. 🧵👇

@sayerjigmi - Sayer Ji

1/ Under the UK’s Investigatory Powers Act (IPA) 2016, Apple was served a Technical Capability Notice (TCN)—forcing them to create a backdoor for encrypted iCloud data. This is not limited to UK users. It applies worldwide, meaning your private files are at risk, no matter where you live. 🔗@macworld report: https://www.macworld.com/article/2602513/uk-demands-backdoor-to-apples-encrypted-cloud-storage-putting-everyone-at-risk.html

UK demands backdoor to Apple's encrypted cloud storage, putting everyone at risk The secret order would instantly compromise the security of over 2 billion Apple users across the globe. macworld.com

@sayerjigmi - Sayer Ji

2/ Apple is legally forbidden from revealing this order. If Apple even acknowledges that the UK issued this demand, they could face criminal charges. This is a secret government order with global consequences.

@sayerjigmi - Sayer Ji

3/ This isn’t just about the UK (although they are leading the charge in threatening citizens in OTHER countries for violating BRITISH censorship laws!) If Apple complies, every government in the world will demand the same access—from the US to China to authoritarian regimes. End-to-end encryption would be effectively dead.

@sayerjigmi - Sayer Ji

4/ Apple’s Choice: 🔓 Comply & weaken encryption globally 🚪 Refuse & withdraw services from the UK WhatsApp & Signal faced similar threats last year and vowed to leave the UK rather than compromise security. Will Apple do the same? 🚨Watch the heated discussion between Damian Collins, director of CCDH (architect of the UK Online Safety Bill), and Signal’s CEO: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E--bVV_eQR0

@sayerjigmi - Sayer Ji

5/ Why This Matters: ☑️Encryption protects financial data, health records, personal security (e.g. where you live or work), and private conversations. ☑️Governments always say they need backdoors for national security—but history shows they’re used for mass surveillance. ☑️Once a backdoor exists, hackers, rogue employees, and other governments WILL find it.

@sayerjigmi - Sayer Ji

6/ The UK is trying to dominate the global surveillance & censorship landscape. The UK is part of Five Eyes (UK, US, Canada, Australia, NZ), but notably, the US, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand have supported strong encryption to mitigate cyber threats. Yet, the UK stands alone in its war on encryption.

@sayerjigmi - Sayer Ji

7/ The Free Speech Crackdown 🛑 This isn’t just about encryption—it’s about control. Governments worldwide are criminalizing dissent and censoring free speech, using tech companies as their enforcement arms. 🔗 GreenMedInfo Report: https://greenmedinfo.com/content/breaking-international-governments-are-criminalizing-free-speech-through-glo-3

Breaking: International Governments Are Criminalizing Free Speech Through Global Coordination; New Files Expose Plot Originally pubished on 2024-09-14 20:12:25   () In a chilling assault on free speech, governments and shadowy organizations are secretly collaborating to silence dissent and criminalize those who dare to question the official narrative. EXPOSED: The Secret Global Plot to Silence and Criminalize Dissent  greenmedinfo.com

@sayerjigmi - Sayer Ji

8/ This ties into the UK’s broader, GLOBALLY ORCHESTATED censorship agenda: ⚠️ The Online Safety Bill criminalizes encrypted messaging & forces platforms to scan private messages. ⚠️ The Digital Services Act (EU) gives governments the power to shut down online content they don’t like. ⚠️ Leaked US-UK documents show direct coordination between UK intelligence & the Biden administration to censor online speech: 🚨Learn more about the global plot to adjudicate and criminalize free speech involving bilateral engagement with 20+ countries, and coordination with NATO and the G7: https://greenmedinfo.com/content/america-first-legal-obtains-new-internal-cdc-documents-revealing-foreign-collu (@America1stLegal's CDC lawsuit revealed this plot)

America First Legal Obtains New Internal CDC Documents Revealing Foreign Collusion in Biden-Harris Government America First Legal Obtains New Internal CDC Documents Revealing Foreign Collusion in Biden-Harris Government Shocking details emerge that connect the dots between foreign entities, the Biden-Harris government, and big tech and their attempts to control speech greenmedinfo.com

@sayerjigmi - Sayer Ji

9/ Meet the architects of speech policing: CCDH 🕵️‍♂️ The Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH)—a UK intelligence-backed group—has been a driving force behind global censorship. They were caught: 🔥 Running “black ops” to suppress RFK Jr.’s presidential campaign. 🔥 Leading the "Kill Musk’s Twitter" directive, trying to shut down free speech on X. 🔥 Labeling 12 private US citizens as the “Disinformation Dozen” to justify mass censorship. 🔗 Reclaim the Net Investigation: https://reclaimthenet.org/black-ops-how-a-us-uk-censorship-group-targeted-rfk-jr-to-stifle-dissent The same UK group behind mass censorship also helped design the UK’s anti-encryption policies via the UK Online Safety Bill passed in 2024.

"Black Ops" – How a US-UK Censorship Group Targeted RFK Jr. To Stifle Dissent Join Reclaim The Net. reclaimthenet.org

@sayerjigmi - Sayer Ji

10/ The Pattern is Clear: 1️⃣ Governments create "safety" laws to justify surveillance. 2️⃣ They pressure tech companies to enforce censorship. 3️⃣ Once encrypted services are gone, nothing is private anymore. This is the biggest attack on digital freedom in history. And most recently @elonmusk and @lindayaX appear to have taken the bait by backing the Kids Online Safety Bill (KOSA) - a 'child safety' bill trojan horse for draconian censorship: https://sayerji.substack.com/p/alert-elon-musk-endorses-ccdh-backed?utm_source=publication-search

ALERT: Elon Musk Endorses CCDH-Backed KOSA (Kid's Online Safety Act)—Is He Unknowingly Aiding the Global Censorship Agenda? Elon Musk’s support for KOSA risks empowering the same censorship forces, like CCDH, that once sought to deplatform him—freedom of speech hangs in the balance. sayerji.substack.com

@sayerjigmi - Sayer Ji

11/ What Can We Do? 🔹 Support companies that refuse to build backdoors (Signal, ProtonMail, etc.). 🔹 Push for legislation that protects encryption & free speech. 🔹 Stay informed & spread awareness—governments count on secrecy to push these policies through. 🔹 Follow and support privacy and internet freedom organizations such as: @G_W_Forum @FFO_Freedom @ReclaimTheNetHQ @standforhealth1 @ChildrensHD @brownstoneinst @anhcampaign @FreeWCH @TheNHF

@sayerjigmi - Sayer Ji

12/ This is the ultimate power grab: controlling all digital communication. If Apple caves, every other platform will be forced to follow. 📌 The UK’s Global Playbook: 🔹 A backdoor to encryption (Investigatory Powers Act). 🔹 A government-linked censorship network (CCDH). 🔹 A speech-policing framework that extends worldwide (Online Safety Bill). This is a global effort to control what people can say, share, and store privately.

@sayerjigmi - Sayer Ji

13/ Final Warning: This is bigger than Apple. It’s about the future of free expression, privacy, and online autonomy. 📣 We are at a crossroads: If we don’t fight back, encryption is gone. If we don’t push back, speech is controlled. This is the modern battle for digital freedom. Support independent journalists like @VigilantFox @TheChiefNerd @KanekoaTheGreat @HealthRanger @zeee_media @newstart_2024 @RenzTom and spread the word!

@MarioNawfal - Mario Nawfal

🚨🇪🇺APPLE PURGES 135,000+ APPS FROM EU APP STORE—TELEGRAM, VPNs AND MORE Apple has removed popular apps like Telegram Lite, Opera VPN, and SmartTube from the EU App Store, citing the Digital Services Act (DSA). Developers were forced to provide contact details or face deletion, raising concerns about whether this is transparency or a crackdown on independent apps. Source: Andro4all

@MarioNawfal - Mario Nawfal

🇩🇪GERMAN MEDIA IS CONTROLLED BY THE LEFT—BUT ELON IS THE “THREAT”? Germany’s top newspapers—Der Spiegel, Die Zeit, Süddeutsche Zeitung—push left-wing narratives, while state-funded ARD and ZDF promote government-approved messaging. Yet the EU is targeting @elonmusk and X for “algorithmic manipulation” under the Digital Services Act (DSA), threatening $300M+ fines and even a ban. Meanwhile, legacy media openly shapes public opinion—but only free speech on X is under investigation. Is this about democracy, or rigging the election against rising opposition? Source: EUnews, PoliticoEU, Reuters

@MarioNawfal - Mario Nawfal

🚨🇩🇪BREAKING: EU MOVES TO CENSOR X—ELECTION RIGGING IN GERMANY? Just days before Germans vote—and as AfD surges in the polls—the EU is threatening X with massive fines and a potential ban. Under the Digital Services Act (DSA), Elon’s platform faces $300M+ penalties for so-called… https://t.co/4W7uVIvaIg

@Inevitablewest - Inevitable West

🚨BREAKING: Apple surrenders to the Labour government and removes highest level data security tool for Apple users The government now has access to its citizens messages and camera roll. This is the biggest breach of privacy Western civilisation has ever seen. Britain is in big trouble.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

10 Shocking Stories the Media Buried This Week #10 – UK government BUSTED in a secret plot to extract personal data from 2 billion iPhone users. They were this close to your “encrypted” data. This story begins when the UK govt hit Apple with a secret gag order, forcing them to either backdoor encrypted data for billions of users or face criminal charges if they refused to comply. Apple couldn’t even talk about it. The order demanded Apple create a vulnerability in its iCloud encryption, which would have given the UK government a back door to financial information, health records, and private conversations—not just of UK citizens but of two billion iPhone users worldwide. Remember, the UK government has already tried to threaten and extradite individuals outside the UK for violating British censorship laws—including US citizens over their online posts. So what happens when governments push to punish you not just for what you say publicly but for what you say privately? Rather than handing over the data of 2 billion iPhone users to the UK government, Apple chose to pull its Advanced Data Protection (ADP) in the UK—removing the option for UK users to enable encryption. Existing UK users must now disable encryption, and new users won’t have the option at all. US citizens and people in other countries remain unaffected by the UK government’s dystopian push to surveil and censor speech—for now. The UK government was this close to surveilling you, too—but luckily, Sayer Ji, Elon Musk, and The Wall Street Journal exposed this privacy nightmare. In another disturbing development, Imran Ahmed of the CCDH—one of the leading architects of the UK’s war on speech—is being awarded for his Orwellian efforts with a $300,000 prize this May. @sayerjigmi has put together a petition to oppose this absurd aggrandizement of someone who has worked tirelessly to annihilate personal freedoms and silence dissenting voices. You can sign that petition here: https://change.org/p/urge-elevate-prize-foundation-to-reexamine-award-for-imran-ahmed (See 9 More Revealing Stories Below)

Sign the Petition I am one of the many who have experienced defamation, deplatforming, and lawfare at the hands of Imran Ahmed and his organization, CCDH. They have targeted me and twelve others they labeled the "disinformation dozen" for merely expressing narratives different from theirs, challenging our very right to free speech, fairness, and open debate. The Elevate Prize Foundation's decision to award Imran Ah change.org

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#9 - Kash Patel Issues Fiery Statement with a Dire Warning After Being Confirmed as FBI Director

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#8 - Pfizer CEO Gets Mercilessly Booed Into Oblivion When Trump Introduces Him at the White House

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#7 - Top Yale Scientists Find Disturbing Immune System Changes After COVID-19 Vaccination It turns out Dr. Robert Malone was right about everything.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#6 - Secret Dept. of Education Operation Exposed in Undercover Video

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

While you’re here, don’t forget to follow me (@VigilantFox) and hit the bell 🔔 for more weekly news roundups.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#5 - Helpless Reporters Die Inside as Stephen Miller Delivers Masterclass Monologue Highlighting Trump’s First 30 Days https://vigilantnews.com/post/helpless-reporters-die-inside-as-stephen-miller-delivers-masterclass-monologue-highlighting-trumps-first-30-days/

Helpless Reporters Die Inside as Stephen Miller Delivers Masterclass Monologue Highlighting Trump’s First 30 Days This is powerful. vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#4 - MAHA Hero Destroys Vaccine Pusher Paul Offit Live on CNN

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#3 - Diddy’s lawyer abruptly quits with a damning statement one day after Kash Patel’s confirmation.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#2 - Dr. Deborah Birx Makes Two Shocking COVID Admissions The “conspiracy theorists” were right again.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#1 - China Reports New Coronavirus “With Pandemic Potential”

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

BONUS #1 - New Study Finds Another Remarkable Benefit of Vitamin D https://vigilantnews.com/post/vitamin-d-protects-against-covid-19-mrna-injection-induced-myocarditis-new-study/

Vitamin D Protects Against COVID-19 mRNA Injection-Induced Myocarditis – New Study Why is this not making headlines? vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

BONUS #2 - The Meat Upgrade You Didn’t Know You Needed https://vigilantnews.com/post/the-meat-upgrade-you-didnt-know-you-needed/

The Meat Upgrade You Didn’t Know You Needed When it comes to meat, not all are created equal. vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

BONUS #3 - Joe Rogan Reveals Fatal Flaw That Could Upend Fauci’s Pardon https://vigilantnews.com/post/joe-rogan-reveals-the-fatal-flaw-that-could-torch-faucis-pardon/

Joe Rogan Reveals Fatal Flaw That Could Upend Fauci’s Pardon The very pardon meant to shield Fauci could actually become his legal trap. Here's why. vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

BONUS #4 - How to Remove Fluoride From Your Water at Home https://www.theepochtimes.com/health/fluoride-free-your-guide-to-water-filtration-and-health-5741827?utm_source=prtnrhard&utm_campaign=vigilantf&src_src=prtnrhard&src_cmp=vigilantf

How to Remove Fluoride From Your Water at Home Since 1945, fluoride has been added to public drinking water supplies, but research has shown it may pose risks to our health. theepochtimes.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

BONUS #5 - Elon Musk Responds to Bombshell Text Messages Exposing Ashley St. Clair’s Alleged “Baby Trap Plot” https://vigilantnews.com/post/elon-musk-responds-to-bombshell-text-messages-exposing-ashley-st-clairs-alleged-baby-trap-plot/

Elon Musk Responds to Bombshell Text Messages Exposing Ashley St. Clair’s Alleged “Baby Trap Plot” Laura Loomer strikes again. vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Thanks for watching! We’ll be back next Sunday at 6 PM Eastern with another hard-hitting episode. In the meantime, follow these accounts and our guests to stay informed. See you next Sunday. @sayerjigmi @GoodRanchers@zeee_media @VigilantNews

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

10 Shocking Stories the Media Buried This Week #10 – UK government BUSTED in a secret plot to extract personal data from 2 billion iPhone users. They were this close to your “encrypted” data. This story begins when the UK govt hit Apple with a secret gag order, forcing them to either backdoor encrypted data for billions of users or face criminal charges if they refused to comply. Apple couldn’t even talk about it. The order demanded Apple create a vulnerability in its iCloud encryption, which would have given the UK government a back door to financial information, health records, and private conversations—not just of UK citizens but of two billion iPhone users worldwide. Remember, the UK government has already tried to threaten and extradite individuals outside the UK for violating British censorship laws—including US citizens over their online posts. So what happens when governments push to punish you not just for what you say publicly but for what you say privately? Rather than handing over the data of 2 billion iPhone users to the UK government, Apple chose to pull its Advanced Data Protection (ADP) in the UK—removing the option for UK users to enable encryption. Existing UK users must now disable encryption, and new users won’t have the option at all. US citizens and people in other countries remain unaffected by the UK government’s dystopian push to surveil and censor speech—for now. The UK government was this close to surveilling you, too—but luckily, Sayer Ji, Elon Musk, and The Wall Street Journal exposed this privacy nightmare. In another disturbing development, Imran Ahmed of the CCDH—one of the leading architects of the UK’s war on speech—is being awarded for his Orwellian efforts with a $300,000 prize this May. @sayerjigmi has put together a petition to oppose this absurd aggrandizement of someone who has worked tirelessly to annihilate personal freedoms and silence dissenting voices. You can sign that petition here: https://www.change.org/p/urge-elevate-prize-foundation-to-reexamine-award-for-imran-ahmed (See 9 More Revealing Stories Below)

Video Transcript AI Summary

Governments are increasingly drunk on power, as evidenced by the UK's order for Apple to backdoor encrypted iCloud data, affecting 2 billion users globally. This stems from the UK's Online Safety Act, which threatens imprisonment for dissenting tweets. Apple was secretly ordered to allow access to worldwide data and faced criminal charges for revealing the order. The UK's actions are part of a broader, globally orchestrated censorship agenda, with the Digital Services Act in the EU granting governments power over online content. Leaked documents show UK intelligence coordinating with the Biden administration to censor online speech. It's a war on encryption and control, mirroring the Rockefeller lockstep document's vision of authoritarian governance.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Welcome back to another week of media blackout, and, boy, do we have some shocking stories for you today. The previous US administration, Australian, Canadian, UK governments, and EU have been following the Rockefeller lockstep document to a t, including the part that happens after the pandemic despite mass awareness and rejection of this agenda. For those that aren't aware of this document, it is titled scenarios for the future of technology and international development published by the Rockefeller Foundation in 2010 and basically outlines exactly how governments in lockstep will gain totalitarian control through a virus and practices adopted during the virus that will continue and, in fact, intensify after the, quote, unquote, pandemic. To quote from the document itself, lockstep, a world of tighter top down government control and more authoritarian leadership with limited innovation and growing citizen pushback. It goes on to say, even after the pandemic faded, this more authoritarian control and oversight of citizens and their activities stuck and even intensified. At first, the notion of a more controlled world gained wide acceptance and approval. Citizens willingly gave up some of their sovereignty and their privacy to more paternalistic states in exchange for greater safety and stability. Citizens were more tolerant and even eager for top down direction and oversight, and national leaders have had more latitude to impose order in the ways they saw fit. In developed countries, this heightened oversight took many forms, biometric IDs for all citizens, for example. And, of course, we have seen this very nightmare scenario continuing to play out. Perhaps one of the most egregious examples is in The UK where in recent times, the government has become so drunk with maddening power that they are imprisoning people for mean tweets, scouring the corners of the Internet for even the slightest criticism of their authoritarian regime and policies. But a new order from the UK government to Apple may have just been the step too far that will change the course of some of this. From Sayo g breaking, The UK just ordered Apple to kill encryption for 2,000,000,000 people, and they can't even talk about it. A global privacy nightmare is unfolding. The UK government secretly ordered Apple to backdoor encrypted iCloud storage worldwide, but Apple is legally forbidden from revealing this order, or they could face criminal charges. Now this affects 2,000,000,000 users, but the point is that they wanted access to worldwide data. So this extends far beyond The UK. And interestingly, Sayer's account was hacked right after Elon retweeted his post raising awareness to this. Under The UK's Investigatory Powers Act 2016, Apple was served a technical capability notice or TCN, forcing them to create a backdoor for encrypted iCloud data. This is not limited to UK users. As we said before, it actually applies worldwide, meaning your private files are at risk no matter where you live. Apple is legally forbidden from revealing this order. If Apple even acknowledges that The UK issued this demand, they could face criminal charges. This is a secret government order with global consequences. And it's not just about The UK, although they are leading the charge in threatening citizens in other countries for violating British censorship laws. You would remember the threats that came from The UK Police Commissioner where they said that they would threaten to extradite and jail US citizens over their online posts. Now Apple's choices are to either comply and weaken encryption globally or refuse and withdraw services from The UK. WhatsApp and Signal faced similar threats last year and vowed to leave The UK rather than compromise security. And this was, of course, after The UK passed the Online Safety Act, bill or The UK Online Safety Bill. Encryption protects financial data and health records and personal security, for example, where you live or work, and also private conversations. So this matters for everyone. Governments always say they need backdoors for national security, but history shows they're just used for mass surveillance. And once a backdoor exists, hackers, rogue employees, and other governments will find it. The UK is trying to dominate the global surveillance and censorship landscape. UK is obviously part of Five Eyes, but notably, The US, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand have supported strong encryption to mitigate cyber threats. But The UK stands alone in its war on encryption. And it's not just about encryption, though. It is about control. And governments worldwide are criminalizing dissent and censoring free speech using tech companies as their enforcement arms. And this ties into The UK's broader globally orchestrated census ship agenda, which is the online safety bill. It criminalizes encrypted messaging and forces platforms to scan private messages. The Digital Services Act in the EU gives governments the power to shut down online content they don't like, and leaked US UK documents show direct coordination between UK intelligence and the Biden administration to censor online speech. So, obviously, Apple has a very difficult decision to make, and in fact, they have made one. Sayagyi has an update on this as well as the backstory. He joins us now. Sayagyi, thank you so much for joining us today. We appreciate you being here. Speaker 1: Thanks for having me. Speaker 0: Well, this story is absolutely shocking along with what happened to you and the update. So pardon me. We've just gone through a bit of a backstory there about what the UK government wanted access to. And, really, this all started with the Online Safety Act of 2023, and they've been very, you know, incrementally creeping into people's lives. But now we have an update as to Apple's response. Talk us through it. Speaker 1: Well, you know, we had a situation February 8 where The Wall Street Journal published what was supposed to be a very private matter, which was the UK government was compelling Apple to basically create a backdoor so they could access the world's encrypted iCloud data. So any any country in the world, theoretically, the UK government would have had access to the advanced data protection services they offer, which most people don't use, but at least gave users the ability to have their key stored offline. So, you know, you don't have to trust that Apple or a government is playing by the rules and keeping your data safe and private. Speaker 0: Right. And so Apple wasn't even allowed to talk about this. And then The UK sorry. Apple could've was was given two options, basically. Do they just withdraw all of their services altogether out of The UK, or do they remove advanced data protection? So talk to us about the response from Apple. Speaker 1: Yeah. The crazy thing is, right, The UK's investigatory powers act of 02/2016 basically enabled them to say, Apple, you cannot even share the fact that we're gonna basically force you to create a backdoor into the world's ostensibly encrypted data. So it was leaked, and, thankfully, The Wall Street Journal got it out. In fact, as you know, on February 8, Elon retweeted my post about it because he said this is crazy. This is absolutely insane because people just don't realize that the governments of the world have this ability, and The UK is obviously the one leading the charge as far as tyrannical overreach and and laying claim to your communications as well as actually adjudicating and criminalizing certain speech, which were is protected here in this country. But their UK online safety bill actually gives them, in theory, extradition power so they could basically say, as a US citizen, you're violating our UK speech laws, and we're gonna prosecute you prosecute you. They even stated that recently. A UK Police Commissioner threatened to extradite US citizens over online posts. He said, we'll come after you. Speaker 0: Yes. Yes. I I remember that. And then The US response was basically shove it. We have a First Amendment. But, you know, other people across the world don't have those same protections, so they were talking about extraditing people from other countries as well. And, of course, we have a precedent set with the case of Julian Assange when it comes to extraditing people to to foreign countries all within this Five Eyes network, it seems. So talk to us about that link and how this is all sort of creeping into that entire Five Eyes network. Speaker 1: Absolutely. So the Five Eyes network is a really big concern here because, essentially, if I'm a US citizen, I go to The UK. At this point, my if I upload something to the cloud, The UK Government has access to all of that. So there's no protection. Now there could have been protection with the advanced data protection services, which are now gone, and The UK can share that with The US, and that's the intelligence sharing agreements among the Five Eyes nations. Right? Australia, New Zealand, Canada, The US, and The UK, essentially violating all of our civil rights, our privacy protections, and our constitution here in The US. So that's been ongoing. Now that this issue has come out to the forefront, I think it's really important for people to appreciate how important, for example, x is in helping to wrench back some of these rights and give us a platform to speak truthfully. That said, they're noting everything that's being said, and they're trying to use that as a way to essentially, again, criminalize free speech. Speaker 0: Yes. You're right. And it's kind of a double edged sword because what you say will be used against you. But at the same time, if you don't speak about it, then it'll be used against you anyway. So the the I for for me, the option's always bravery. But I'm interested in your thoughts about how Apple responded because they really were faced with these two very difficult options. And, essentially, people are saying they should have just pulled out their service from The UK, and people would have been outraged at this. And then they could have, you know, protested and maybe repealed some of these laws or, you know, whatever measures the the citizens of The UK could have taken are now essentially being taken away from them. They don't even have an option for privacy, albeit the advanced data protection was not used that much. But without that, then, essentially, there's no encrypt encryption anyway, so it kind of allows governments to use the data anyway now. Speaker 1: Yeah. Exactly. So WhatsApp and Signal already threatened to leave The UK if something similar was forced upon them. And so I think Apple made the right decision. If they had pulled all iCloud services from The UK, I think that would have probably crashed their civilization for quite some time. But I do think that they may have not done a good enough job of of really pushing back and and speaking openly about this because the gag order, you know, that that is imposed upon them is so egregious that they they would have potentially given access to the world's encrypted data and violated the law if they spoke up about it. Well, at this point, you know, we had to all face being deplatformed or worse by speaking up about some of the nightmares that unfolded with the COVID, you know, you know, pandemic, if you will. And now entire big tech corporations, multinationals are having to do the same as well. So it's really quite a moment for us all to be in the same you know, we're in the same boat here. We all have to do something, corporations, individuals, to stop, as you said, bravery is the solution, this insane reenactment of seditious libel. You know? The crown is literally trying to exert total control over the world and over speech and turning it into a weapon against the people, that's similar to having your tongue cut out or your head cut off for speaking against the government narrative. You know? That's where we're at right now. Speaker 0: We are. The and we see, you know, insane laws across every single western nation except The US, really. Australia's recent hate speech laws, now they're bringing in anti vilification laws across states. Basically, now if someone says something that someone deems offensive, they can go to prison. There is a new, bill that was introduced again without debate. Seven years mandatory sentence if you say something, quote, unquote, reckless. It's it's it's really unbelievable. And what's interesting about this UK case, Sayer, is that The UK Investigatory Powers Act of 02/2016 was used in order for the British government to issue this secret order to Apple that they weren't even allowed to talk about. What what I find so fascinating about this is how long this has been in the works. That means that back in 02/2016, someone, some lawmaker said, you know, we're gonna be able to use this legislation later to weaponize. Look how look how far ahead they planned. This is nine years ago. And so I think the the point is that people really need to pay attention to some of these laws that are being introduced. You and I have previously spoken about the COSA legislation in The United States. We have to be aware of these laws and oppose them so that they can't be weaponized against us nine years later. Speaker 1: Absolutely. I'm glad you bring a COSA because it turns out that one of the primary proponents and, if you will, backdoor architects of COSA is the same organization that was behind the online safety bill, which is the Center for Countering Digital Hate. So, basically, this organization, their CEO, Imram Ahmed, literally was found in a leaked memo to have been involved in setting a black ops, these are his words, on a presidential candidate, which is RFK junior, are now acting, you know, HHS secretary. That is such an egregious thing for for it to have been discovered. In fact, CCDH was also involved in placing political operatives in this country through Morgan McSweeney, their founder, who was a a, you know, adviser to Kirstarmer as well as to the to Harris. So we have the infiltration of our, you know, election integrity, you know, political process that that actually goes back to 02/2021. This is the one report that has not been discussed in the mainstream media that, thankfully, because of your journalism and Vigilant Fox and others, the information is getting out. But there was an America First legal lawsuit against the CDC which discovered that in 02/2021, the UK's counter disinformation unit gave a interagency master class on censorship, right, to the US National Security Council's interagency policy committee. The FBI, CISA was there, USAID, army, navy. I mean, you you can't make this stuff up. And they literally decided they were gonna deploy what is essentially a weapons grade AI system that was, used in, for example, Twitter Twitter one point o to, automatically, track, you know, the the speech of every single user and then start start associating terms like questioning mass with the word Nazi, basically labeling that anti Semitic speech, and then just deplatforming people automatically. Anyone with 5,000 followers or less. This was going on. Millions of Americans had their speech suppressed and their, you know, behavior tracked. It's probably still in the dossier somewhere, right, by the UK government. They literally infected our executive branch and then deployed these weapons grade systems in the big tech stack that essentially violated the rights of all Americans, not just the so called disinfo dozen, which I'm proud to be on the list now. And so this is what was going on. They were literally trying to take over our government. They succeeded in large part, but now, of course, as we can see, there was a huge mandate of the people. We have a new administration. We even have an executive order now protecting us against this very thing, thankfully. Speaker 2: Yes. Speaker 1: So we are turning the tide, But thanks to reporting like this, the context is global. There was in that PowerPoint, it was stated clearly there were 20 plus bilateral engagements with countries, including the Five Eyes network. It was also g seven in order to implement a global plan to shut down free speech and do exactly what we're observing the UK government to be doing right now. Speaker 0: Yes. It's really interesting, and I think a a lot of people are starting to realize just how much the UK government had to do with all of this. The the report that you're talking about being a crucial part during COVID, just how deeply involved they were with the censorship. You just look at, they them deploying members of their own government to come to The US during election season to lobby for Kamala Harris. I still think that's foreign interference. I I don't understand how that was allowed to occur. But, you know, it's it's one thing to show support. It's another thing to go and actively lobby. I mean, anyway, I just wanna know from you about this hack that you experienced right after. So so you tweet this information. It gets shared by Elon Musk. I think it had 18,000,000 views or or if I'm not mistaken. And then you get hacked almost immediately after. Speaker 1: It was crazy. That morning, I just happened to be looking at my phone twenty three seconds after he reposted the story that we're discussing. And within a matter of a few minutes, I had on my account these strange crypto posts. You know, it was promoting some kind of, like, scam coin. And I I quickly went in, changed my settings, was able to get the password to change, and somehow recovered my account. But just few minutes before that, I had just finished the, process of getting my own advanced data protection services activated through my phone because I didn't even know it existed either until the story came up. It turns out my partner is a UK citizen, And when she confirmed that she was the, you know, the backup to my account, somehow my account got hacked right at that moment. So I think it had to do with that, and it's very strange, right, that it had to do with my private key being transmitted basically to a UK citizen, and suddenly my account was hacked. It hasn't happened in fifteen years. Speaker 0: Wow. Speaker 1: I've been on Twitter for fifteen years. Speaker 0: That is that is absolutely fascinating. And it's interesting because, you know, you say it's a whole bunch of crypto scammers we know full well. I mean okay. We theorize full well that intelligence agencies, and governments are utilizing bots and scammer accounts to actually target dissidents. This is one of their ways. You know, you post something controversial, and immediately you have bots in your replies or liking your stuff to suppress your content. This is a this is a known tactic. In in my opinion, we don't have hard evidence for it, but it's a clear pattern that a lot of users have reported. So I wonder whether it was the fact that you were drawing attention to this that maybe, some shady characters were involved in that. Very, very interesting. Well, Sayar, as you mentioned, the tide is really turning, and more and more people are growing aware of this. What should people be doing now? Speaker 1: Well, we have legislation in this country that's modeled after The UK online safety bill and the EU Digital Services Act, which basically strips from us the privacy protections and rights that we have that are conferred to us by our beautiful constitution. So, unfortunately, Linda and Elon have actually endorsed the latest kids online safety bill even though the Center for Countering Digital Hate, which Elon is suing, right, and who's you know, tried to make it their purpose to destroy myself and other Americans for speaking up. They actually don't seem to realize that they are part of the agenda, which was revealed in the black ops memo, kill Elon's Twitter being the top line item for the year, and Speaker 2: then Speaker 1: trigger legislative regulation right underneath. This is actually part of that agenda, and there's about eight bills sponsored right now which would strip our basic rights under the ages of where you need to protect protect children, right, from from online harm. That is the way in which they have tried to legislate, lobby, affect PR, which is, again, CCDH is an unregistered foreign agent at the very least for the fact that that is their intention. They've made it very clear, and they're being allowed to run rogue. Last thing I'll say on that is that Imran Ahmed is supposed to receive an award by the Elevate Foundation Prize in Miami, May Twelfth To The Fourteenth. Three Hundred Thousand Dollars unrestricted and this prestigious prize for doing what? It's just amazing that they're basically getting replatformed in this country when they're subject to all of these congressional inquiries, lawsuits, DOJ complaints. This this is absurd. I really hope that people can sign the petition I put together, which is to oppose this absurd aggrandizement of someone who has completely attempted to annihilate our freedoms here in this country. Speaker 0: Where do people find that petition? Speaker 1: That's actually on change.org, and I I can give you a link to it. And it's, you know, just absurd that this would be allowed to happen, and that organization would would confer this kind of prestige and just shower him with cash for essentially targeting our our own political candidates and interfering with our elections. I mean, it's really ridiculous. Speaker 0: Yes, please. If you send that link, we'll make sure to share it around as well when we post this so that people can actually get involved. We we've gotta stay on top of this, say, what just happened in The UK is absolutely egregious. But, really, there are a lot of bad actors everywhere in the world that are trying to do the same thing to every country. Essentially, they wanna erase privacy, make everything the government basically invade every area of your lives, big tech invade every area of your lives, and we can't allow that to happen. Thank you so much. Saya, please let people know where they can follow you. Speaker 1: Thanks so much. Yeah. Basically, I still do most of my reporting GreenMedInfo.com. And, of course, on X, you can find me, Sayer G. I love to post these sorts of updates in real time. Speaker 0: Fantastic. Well, that is the X account at Sayer G, and the links for his websites are on there. Saya, thank you so much for your time. We really appreciate you being here. Speaker 1: Thanks so much, and I I really appreciate the work you're doing to, re replatform the Fifth Estate so that we can continue to have actual free speech in this country and the world. So thank you for that. Speaker 0: Appreciate you. Talk soon. Thanks. Well, we are very grateful for people like Sayagyi who are committed to bringing the truth and building a better future for humanity. And speaking of building a better future, our food supply is absolutely crucial to achieving that goal. Did you know that over 85% of the grass fed beef in stores is imported? That's because the country of origin labeling law was repealed in 2015. So now meat can be packaged here in The US and earn a product of USA label even if it was born, raised, and harvested overseas. And the truth is much of the meat on the grocery store shelves is filled with things you don't want, from antibiotics, hormones, questionable origins, and even harmful seed oils. But at Good Ranchers, transparency isn't just a buzzword. It is a promise. All products at Good Ranchers have trustworthy ingredients. Their meat is born, raised, and harvested right here in The USA, so you know exactly where it comes from. It's free from hidden additives. There are no antibiotics ever, no added hormones, and no seed oils. Just one simple ingredient that you can read, and that's meat. Jermaine Gill, the chief growth officer of Good Ranches, explains what you need to know about the current state of the meat market. He joins us now. Jermaine, thank you so much for joining us today. We appreciate you being here. Speaker 2: Yeah. Thank you, Maria. Anytime we get a chance to, you know, talk about Good Ranchers and talk about agriculture, here at Good Ranchers, we always always wanna take that opportunity. So thank you, and thank you for being an advocate for, the local farms and ranches here in The US. I know it's important to you. It's important subject to us, so thank you. Speaker 0: It's absolutely important to me. This is preserving our food supply and the integrity of our food supply is paramount, And I don't think people really realize that until the food supply actually is at risk. And it is at risk all over the world. There is an attack specifically on farmers. There's an attack on meat, on protein. And so we wanna talk about, the integrity as well of the meat that people are getting when they go to good ranches. This is this is so important. So talk to us about the fact that when people go to the supermarket, they don't actually know for sure that their meat is coming from America. Speaker 2: Yeah. In 2015, the US government passed a country of origin labeling law that says that it's called the coal law. So it says that beef and pork in The US doesn't have to actually be born and raised, harvested here to be called product of The USA. So you can see that a stamp on some ground beef, and it'll have the American flag, and it says product USA. All it has to do is be further processed here in the country. So that means that it can be born, raised, harvested in another country, you know, Mexico, Uruguay, Latin America, South America. Those are the big places that we see a lot. Canada too. We see a lot of beef imported in from those other countries. And then it's either, you know, processed, meaning, like, cutting the steaks or ground up here in The US, and it now becomes called the product of The USA. Yeah. So, I mean, it's kinda it's very misleading. Right? Because, honest you know, The US is the best grower of beef chicken pork in the world. Right? We do the best job. We set all of the standards for animal husbandry, animal right, how we treat the animal, all of these things. You know, The US Agriculture is when it sets the standard for those things. And and so we pride ourselves on being the best growers. And it's kinda sad to see that because of this law, there's you know, almost 3,000,000,000 pounds of of beef have been imported into The US Wow. Over the or, like, last 2024. And so the regular American consumer doesn't even know. Right? They they trust that little American flag, that product USA labeling. And then in a bind, they don't realize, you know, that they can't tell where the meat has come from. That's why I had good ranch go ahead. I'm sorry. Go ahead. Speaker 0: Well, no. I I just wanted to say this is so, so important. People need to realize how how vital this is because we recently have an example out of The UK domain where there was a huge backlash over Beauvais ten. Now for people that aren't aware of that, this is can be a very, very dangerous additive, and the studies initial studies show that it can cause things like infertility and maybe even cancer. And so there was a backlash in The UK over this being inside dairy products. And so what they started to do was hide the the manufacturer, so from other products so that people wouldn't be aware that they were purchasing something that had beauveur in it, and you guarantee there's no beauveur in the meat. Right? Speaker 2: Yeah. No Beauvaeh. Yeah. We we've worked really hard, and and so our our our founder has been in Corley Spell. When they started the company, they started out of the need and desire to know where their where their meat was coming from. Right? They had started a family, and they started to do some more research and digging into, like, what the meat industry looked like in The US. And so out of the desire for a clean product, vaccine free products, products that they know that they could trust and that they could feed their family, that's where Good Ranchers came from. And so the heart and soul of who we are is it's two parts. Right? It's it's one, we want we always wanna support the American farm and rancher. I mean, I I I know I don't know if you know this, but, you know, ranches and farms, the small local are closing left and right because of imported beef and this, you know, big farm, big beef industry, big meat industry. So, one, we wanna support those guys. That's part of our mission. It's part of our heart. We wanna, you know, bring advocacy to them. We wanna tell their stories. We wanna be able to support them. Right? And so we've done that over the last seven years of of being in business. We've really done that. The other piece to the heart and soul of who we are is this the idea of a clean product, product that you can trust. And, you know, a hundred years ago that's when I was just telling this story to somebody earlier today. About a hundred years ago, if you were, you know, here in The US, you wanted to get, you know, chicken or beef, you would just, you know, go down the street to your local rancher and farm. You would meet the rancher and farm. Right? You would set up some you'd buy directly from them or from, like, a small butcher shop that had that connection. Well, as cities have grown, we've lost that connection. Right? We're we're no longer connected to our our food supply. Right? We we don't know where it's coming from. We don't know what is and a lot of us don't have time to really go and do the research. That's why, you know, trusting a company like Good Ranchers, we go out there. We do the research for you. We make sure it's a clean product. We make sure it's a product that we would feed ourselves. Been in correlating myself. We do the same thing. There we would never sell anything that we wouldn't feed to our own family. And so, you know, you don't have the time to go find those ranchers and those farmers, and let us go do the sourcing for you. That that's sort of that's that is who we are. Right? So let us do the sourcing. Let's make sure that the product's clean, the cleanest it can be, so that you can know and have trust that what you're feeding your family is it's it's supporting local farms and ranches in The US, and it's a clean product. Speaker 0: Well, this is what what you do at Good Ranchers is so important, Jermaine, because we have to keep those local farmers and those local ranches alive. Like I said, there is a sort of coordinated global attack on them. And whilst that may be different under the new administration, we have to keep their business going. We have to you know, we hope to see changes, and we hope to see farmers supported, but we have to keep that momentum going because you just look at how, over the years, not supporting local farms and, you know, just buying from supermarkets where you can't be certain of where your meat is from, and it's all sort of, you know, big business, big ag rather than the the grassroots people that actually care about the quality of the meat. Over the years, that's allowed many of them to be attacked, to be overregulated, you know, with you know, if you don't upgrade to this smart ag, which costs millions of dollars, you're gonna be shut down. We really have to put in effort to advocate for these businesses because this is our food. This is our strength. This is what keeps our families healthy. And let me just say, Jermaine, I'm gonna tell you, you know, I'm from Australia originally. I'm in I'm in America now, but when I was there, we we have incredible meat in Australia, and I I partnered as well with a company that does similar things to what Good Ranches does in Australia, and their meat was fantastic. And I came to The US, and I just couldn't find tasty meat anywhere. And then I tried Good Ranches, and it is good. It is very, very delicious. I will tell you that openly. And so I I think it's it's a fantastic option for people. What what are some other really important points for you? Speaker 2: Yeah. I mean, for us, you know you know, tariffs is a big thing that everybody are talking about right now. Right? And so, you know, one of the things that we we drew a line in the sand very early on in the company was that not only was our meat gonna be born, raised, and harvested in The US, but our whole supply chain was gonna be a % US based. So that's why when you're gonna see rising cost of meat products in the grocery store, the butcher shop, other online meat companies that are importing products in from overseas, you're not gonna see that same rising cost with us because we've we've already secured our whole supply chain to be a % American. So, you know, as you start to get that, like, pricing sensitivity, right, people are gonna start and and and we're we see it now. Right? We talk about it. It's all over the news. Right? Price of eggs are increasing. Price of ground beef is increasing. Everything. You're gonna see it we see it all over the place now. You know, when you buy from good ranchers, you can be secure that your price is gonna be it's gonna stay the same for why you're with us as well as you know, we're always we always wanna give back. We always wanna give value back to our customers. So, like, one of the things that we're running right now is, like, free meat for a year. Right? So, you know, free you get to choose ground beef, chicken, salmon, whatever, you know, whatever product you want. And we're gonna give you a portion of that for free for a year. So, you know, not like I said, we're we're trying to give back to not just local farms and ranches, but to the American family. Right? Or, you know, part of our goal is to bring people to the table. And so we know that, you know, there is some fear or, you know, hesitancy there with pricing and concern that the price of beef and price of meat is gonna continue to rise. You know, with good ranchers, we're here to help. Right? And so we've kind of got ahead of the whole tariff thing. Right? And there's this, you know, movement to bring American meat, right, to buy American. And so, that's what we've been doing since we started. Right? And so we're we're happy to be a part of the solution, right, and a part of the answer. Speaker 0: Well, I'm really grateful for that. I I applaud your mission. I really do. We have to support local farms, local branches. This is one of the most important things that we have to do because our food supply is at the core of our health. Like, it's it's that simple. Yeah. And so and I really I Speaker 2: will say I will say one. Speaker 0: Go on. Speaker 2: Yeah. I'll say one thing. You know, you don't have to sacrifice quality and taste for clean and and, you know, chopping your values. Right? Like, our prod like you said it earlier, I I I mean, I've we've had beef from all over now. The best. You know? And I will hands down put Good Ranchers a Good Ranchers product up against any other thing. You know, we we not only are we, like, trying to source the cleanest thing, but we age all of our beef, you know, a minimum of 28. Our chicken is all small, but we have a internal saying, and it's kinda funny. People will come for the steak, but they stay for the chicken because our chicken is just so phenomenal. Speaker 0: Is good. Speaker 2: You think, like, all chicken is right. It's all made the same, but our chicken just you you can taste the difference. It's it's more tender. It's got a little bit of a different flavor profile to it. It's a smaller it's not those gigantic pterodactyl sized chicken breasts you're gonna see at the grocery store. It's pumped full of hormones. It's a smaller chicken breast. So, like, you know, it it's phenomenal. I I I would just say our our product, you don't have to sacrifice quality or taste. Speaker 0: Well, what I really Speaker 2: and and and do right. Speaker 0: Absolutely. And what I really love as well is that it comes in portions. So when you're buying meat from the supermarket, you might get a whole bunch of unwanted parts that you're paying for but throwing out where Good Ranchers gets all those portions for you. You're actually getting what you pay for, And then it's easier for meal prep as well. So there's just so many benefits, Jermaine. I I, again, love the meat. I'm I'm going to be regularly buying it. I recently tried it. I love it. It's great. You can taste the the quality of the meat. And just knowing as well that we're supporting local local farmers and ranchers is number one. This needs to become, you know, really the the motto of America going forward. The motto of every country, really. You have to support your farmers and your ranchers. You have to. It's it's it's paramount to our existence. And so and and the added benefit of the value add that you're giving to your customers as well because you're not just giving back to the businesses, but also to your customers is just wonderful. So thank you so much for your time today, Jermaine. I really appreciate it. This is how you can be sure of the safety and the quality of your meat by purchasing from Good Ranchers Direct. Thank you so much, Jermaine. Speaker 2: Thank you. Thanks for having us. And, again, like I said, Maria, thank you for your support. Thank you for, highlighting the needs of us ranchers, farmers out there. And, you know, you we cannot stress this enough. Like, securing a great of your food supply, understanding where your meat come from, and finding a trusted provider is so important. It's it you know, we it's like we're feeding our future, really, honestly. Right? Because, you know, what we put in our bodies is important. So thank you for trusting Good Ranchers. Appreciate it. Thanks so much. Speaker 0: Appreciate you. Thank you. Speaker 2: Thanks. You have a great day. Speaker 0: Huge thanks to Jermaine Gill and Good Ranchers for sponsoring the show and offering a truly clean, transparent meat service that supports our values and the good of humanity. And speaking of clean food, I have exciting news. Good Ranch's seed oil free chicken nuggets are back. Made with whole cuts of chicken, they're gluten free, allergen safe, and packed with delicious clean flavor. You can subscribe to a box or add them to any order at GoodRanches.com/VNN. But here's the best part. Good Ranches delivers straight to your door, skipping the grocery store and offering farm to table transparency. Right now, when you subscribe to any box at Good Ranches, you'll get free ground beef, chicken breasts, or wild caught salmon for a full year plus $25 off when you use the code VNN at checkout. Don't miss out on the pleasure of eating top quality meat. Go to GoodRanchers.com/VNN and use code VNN to get free meat for a year and $25 off your order. We love their services, and we think you will too.

Sign the Petition I am one of the many who have experienced defamation, deplatforming, and lawfare at the hands of Imran Ahmed and his organization, CCDH. They have targeted me and twelve others they labeled the "disinformation dozen" for merely expressing narratives different from theirs, challenging our very right to free speech, fairness, and open debate. The Elevate Prize Foundation's decision to award Imran Ah change.org

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

10 Shocking Stories the Media Buried Today #10 - Persuasion expert bets his career on the COVID response being a full-blown psyop. JOE ROGAN: “Do you think that someone sat in a room and that people discussed the best ways to get people to comply?” CHASE HUGHES: “Yes. Oh, yes. I would bet my career because it was executed following textbook protocol.” Hughes explained that the key sign of a psyop is “if the opinion that’s coming out needs people to be silenced.” “So if you can’t question it—if you’re supposed to just go along, it’s a psyop,” Hughes reiterated. During COVID, terms like “disinformation” and “misinformation” flooded the airwaves, but those terms were often weaponized to discredit voices and opinions the government didn’t like. Doctors like Jay Bhattacharya and Martin Kulldorff, respected scientists at Stanford and Harvard, were silenced simply for challenging lockdowns through the Great Barrington Declaration. “And it was openly discussed in emails,” Rogan pointed out. “That’s what’s really crazy. They talked about the strategy of silencing these people, and then you had the actual government itself contacting Twitter, trying to get people removed, which is wild.” They even went as far as to write headlines like “Mocking anti-vaxxers’ COVID deaths is ghoulish, yes — but may be necessary” (LA Times). “My hope is that people have learned from this past four years and that this is an eye-opener,” Rogan said. (See 9 More Revealing Stories Below)

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#9 - @DataRepublican stuns Glenn Beck with a blunt explanation of how the shadow government subverts the will of the people. “They’re offended [by DOGE] because their power depends on people not knowing what they’re doing with [our] money. “And so that is truly censorship. Because I think if actual Americans understood what they were doing with our money and that they were actually setting up their own government and actually ignoring what real people wanted to do, oh, we would be so upset. “Because the reality is that these people have a government unto themselves that they’ve created with these NGOs that they run separately from us. “And the reason I’m doing this interview is because I want to promote the knowledge to the public that these people operate in different vocabulary, with different rules, and they have made their own government inside ours with our money.” Nobody’s ever broken it down like this before. Data Republican just pulled back the curtain—and it’s worse than we thought.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@DataRepublican #8 - Democrats are flailing over Musk & DOGE gaining access to IRS data. But in 2023, Joe Biden gave 53 unpaid researchers & student volunteers access to the SAME SYSTEM & they said NOTHING. Credit: @ByronDonalds

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@DataRepublican @ByronDonalds #7 - Joy Reid breaks down in tears after MSNBC firing. “My show had value!”

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@DataRepublican @ByronDonalds #6 - Karoline Leavitt warns Washington bureaucrats that they should be “nervous” over Dan Bongino’s FBI nomination. “We often see that when outsiders are appointed to such coveted positions, a lot of people in this city get very, very nervous. And they should be...”

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@DataRepublican @ByronDonalds While you’re here, don’t forget to follow me (@VigilantFox) and hit the bell 🔔 for more daily news roundups.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@DataRepublican @ByronDonalds #5 - Don Lemon tells Megyn Kelly to F off. “Let me just say to Megyn Kelly, in my 30-some years as a journalist and my 50-some years as a person of color, go f**k yourself.” Credit: @TheChiefNerd

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@DataRepublican @ByronDonalds @TheChiefNerd #4 - FBI Whistleblower Drops a Disturbing Bombshell on Kash Patel and Dan Bongino https://vigilantnews.com/post/deep-state-in-panic-whistleblower-says-fbi-is-deleting-damning-evidence-even-musk-cant-save/

FBI Whistleblower Drops a Disturbing Bombshell on Kash Patel and Dan Bongino The rabbit hole just got deeper. vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@DataRepublican @ByronDonalds @TheChiefNerd #3 - Maddow DETONATES: Slams MSNBC as Racist in Jaw-Dropping Rant https://vigilantnews.com/post/maddow-detonates-slams-msnbc-as-racist-in-jaw-dropping-rant/

Maddow DETONATES: Slams MSNBC as Racist in Jaw-Dropping Rant Is Rachel Maddow next on the chopping block? vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@DataRepublican @ByronDonalds @TheChiefNerd #2 - AI Robot ‘Attacks’ Crowd in China https://vigilantnews.com/post/watch-ai-robot-attacks-crowd-in-china/

Watch: AI Robot ‘Attacks’ Crowd in China Creepy as hell. vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

#1 - The U.S. is facing a full-blown mortality crisis, and insurance data shows it’s worse than anyone thought. Life expectancy in the U.S. is now worse than it was a decade ago. Josh Stirling, founder of the Insurance Collaboration to Save Lives, says mortality rates are alarmingly high, especially for younger age groups. Why? The evidence points to the COVID-19 vaccines, says Epidemiologist Nic Hulscher. Here’s his breakdown: Cardiac deaths up 8-36%: The largest COVID-19 vaccine safety study ever conducted (99 million vaccinated individuals) found myocarditis risk surges up to 610% post-mRNA injection. Subclinical vaccine-induced myopericarditis may trigger reentrant ventricular tachycardia or spontaneous ventricular fibrillation, leading to sudden cardiac death. Our King County, WA study and @EthicalSkeptic analysis of CDC data confirm excess sudden cardiac deaths skyrocketed after mass mRNA injection. Neurological deaths up 16-39%: mRNA injections linked to Ischemic stroke (+44%), Hemorrhagic stroke (+50%), Transient ischemic attack (+67%), Myelitis (+165%), Myasthenia gravis (+71%), Alzheimer’s (+22.5%), Cognitive impairment (+138%), Depression (+68.3%), Anxiety disorders (+43.9%), Sleep disorders (+93.4%)—the neurological toll is undeniable. Cancer rates up 10-50%: CDC data, peer-reviewed studies, and population-level analyses suggest COVID-19 mRNA injections are likely carcinogenic, contributing to rising cancer cases. Ethical Skeptic's analysis of CDC data shows excess cancer mortality up 9% post-mRNA rollout. Studies suggest mRNA injections may impair immune surveillance, hinder DNA repair, and accelerate tumor growth—fulfilling the Multi-Hit Hypothesis of Oncogenesis. Case reports link the shots to aggressive cancers, including intravascular large B-cell lymphoma, hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis, and cutaneous adenoid cystic carcinoma. The surge in post-vaccine cancer cases demands urgent investigation. “These data suggest that the mass COVID-19 mRNA injection campaign is a primary driver of the collapse in U.S. life expectancy, preventing its full recovery,” Hulscher concluded. “Urgent intervention by the federal government is indicated to immediately remove these life-reducing injections from the market and begin steps to reverse these negative trends.” Follow @NicHulscher for more breaking news and analysis on the COVID-19 injections.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@DataRepublican @ByronDonalds @TheChiefNerd BONUS #1 - Man Loses 300 Pounds on Carnivore Diet Rejected by MDs https://www.theepochtimes.com/bright/i-only-eat-eggs-bacon-beef-720-pound-man-loses-300-pounds-on-carnivore-diet-rejected-by-mds-5636989?utm_source=copyreflink&utm_campaign=vigilantf&src_src=copyreflink&src_cmp=vigilantf

‘I Only Eat Eggs, Bacon, Beef’: 720-Pound Man Loses 300 Pounds on Carnivore Diet Rejected by MDs theepochtimes.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@DataRepublican @ByronDonalds @TheChiefNerd BONUS #2 - Why Your Doctor Is Probably Wrong About Cholesterol https://www.theepochtimes.com/health/why-dietary-cholesterol-isnt-the-enemy-5796165?utm_source=copyreflink&utm_campaign=vigilantf&src_src=copyreflink&src_cmp=vigilantf

Why Dietary Cholesterol Isn’t the Enemy Research shows dietary cholesterol has little impact on blood cholesterol. So what really affects it? theepochtimes.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@DataRepublican @ByronDonalds @TheChiefNerd BONUS #3 - How to Get Ivermectin, Z-Pak and More https://vigilantnews.com/post/how-to-get-ivermectin-z-pak-and-more/

How to Get Ivermectin, Z-Pak, and More While millions of Americans understand the need to be prepared, far too many are failing to stockpile one of the single most important items. vigilantnews.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@DataRepublican @ByronDonalds @TheChiefNerd BONUS #4 - Top Doctor Reveals Simple Formula to Prevent 80 Percent of Chronic Diseases https://www.theepochtimes.com/health/a-doctors-simple-formula-to-prevent-80-percent-of-chronic-diseases-5789789?utm_source=copyreflink&utm_campaign=vigilantf&src_src=copyreflink&src_cmp=vigilantf

A Doctor’s Simple Formula to Prevent 80 Percent of Chronic Diseases A Yale-graduate doctor discusses how lessons learned from our ancestors can help us live longer, better lives. theepochtimes.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@DataRepublican @ByronDonalds @TheChiefNerd BONUS #5 - How to Remove Fluoride From Your Water at Home https://www.theepochtimes.com/health/fluoride-free-your-guide-to-water-filtration-and-health-5741827?utm_source=prtnrhard&utm_campaign=vigilantf&src_src=prtnrhard&src_cmp=vigilantf

How to Remove Fluoride From Your Water at Home Since 1945, fluoride has been added to public drinking water supplies, but research has shown it may pose risks to our health. theepochtimes.com

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@DataRepublican @ByronDonalds @TheChiefNerd Thanks for reading! If you enjoyed this report, please do me a quick favor and follow me (@VigilantFox) for more posts like this one. In other news, the UK government just got BUSTED in a secret plot to extract your data. Read more below:

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

10 Shocking Stories the Media Buried This Week #10 – UK government BUSTED in a secret plot to extract personal data from 2 billion iPhone users. They were this close to your “encrypted” data. This story begins when the UK govt hit Apple with a secret gag order, forcing them to either backdoor encrypted data for billions of users or face criminal charges if they refused to comply. Apple couldn’t even talk about it. The order demanded Apple create a vulnerability in its iCloud encryption, which would have given the UK government a back door to financial information, health records, and private conversations—not just of UK citizens but of two billion iPhone users worldwide. Remember, the UK government has already tried to threaten and extradite individuals outside the UK for violating British censorship laws—including US citizens over their online posts. So what happens when governments push to punish you not just for what you say publicly but for what you say privately? Rather than handing over the data of 2 billion iPhone users to the UK government, Apple chose to pull its Advanced Data Protection (ADP) in the UK—removing the option for UK users to enable encryption. Existing UK users must now disable encryption, and new users won’t have the option at all. US citizens and people in other countries remain unaffected by the UK government’s dystopian push to surveil and censor speech—for now. The UK government was this close to surveilling you, too—but luckily, Sayer Ji, Elon Musk, and The Wall Street Journal exposed this privacy nightmare. In another disturbing development, Imran Ahmed of the CCDH—one of the leading architects of the UK’s war on speech—is being awarded for his Orwellian efforts with a $300,000 prize this May. @sayerjigmi has put together a petition to oppose this absurd aggrandizement of someone who has worked tirelessly to annihilate personal freedoms and silence dissenting voices. You can sign that petition here: https://www.change.org/p/urge-elevate-prize-foundation-to-reexamine-award-for-imran-ahmed (See 9 More Revealing Stories Below)

Video Transcript AI Summary

Governments worldwide are following a totalitarian control agenda outlined in the Rockefeller Foundation's "Lockstep" document. The UK government, in particular, is leading the charge, secretly ordering Apple to create a backdoor for encrypted iCloud data, affecting 2 billion users worldwide. This order, issued under the Investigatory Powers Act, is a global privacy nightmare. Apple faces a difficult choice: comply and weaken encryption globally, or withdraw services from the UK. This move ties into a broader censorship agenda, including the UK's Online Safety Bill and the EU's Digital Services Act, which criminalize dissent and censor free speech. Governments are using tech companies as enforcement arms, threatening citizens for online criticism, highlighting a war on encryption and control.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Welcome back to another week of media blackout, and, boy, do we have some shocking stories for you today. The previous US administration, Australian, Canadian, UK governments, and EU have been following the Rockefeller lockstep document to a t, including the part that happens after the pandemic despite mass awareness and rejection of this agenda. For those that aren't aware of this document, it is titled scenarios for the future of technology and international development published by the Rockefeller Foundation in 2010 and basically outlines exactly how governments in lockstep will gain totalitarian control through a virus and practices adopted during the virus that will continue and, in fact, intensify after the, quote, unquote, pandemic. To quote from the document itself, lockstep, a world of tighter top down government control and more authoritarian leadership with limited innovation and growing citizen pushback. It goes on to say, even after the pandemic faded, this more authoritarian control and oversight of citizens and their activities stuck and even intensified. At first, the notion of a more controlled world gained wide acceptance and approval. Citizens willingly gave up some of their sovereignty and their privacy to more paternalistic states in exchange for greater safety and stability. Citizens were more tolerant and even eager for top down direction and oversight, and national leaders have had more latitude to impose order in the ways they saw fit. In developed countries, this heightened oversight took many forms, biometric IDs for all citizens, for example. And, of course, we have seen this very nightmare scenario continuing to play out. Perhaps one of the most egregious examples is in The UK where in recent times, the government has become so drunk with maddening power that they are imprisoning people for mean tweets, scouring the corners of the Internet for even the slightest criticism of their authoritarian regime and policies. But a new order from the UK government to Apple may have just been the step too far that will change the course of some of this. From Sayo g breaking, The UK just ordered Apple to kill encryption for 2,000,000,000 people, and they can't even talk about it. A global privacy nightmare is unfolding. The UK government secretly ordered Apple to backdoor encrypted iCloud storage worldwide, but Apple is legally forbidden from revealing this order, or they could face criminal charges. Now this affects 2,000,000,000 users, but the point is that they wanted access to worldwide data. So this extends far beyond The UK. And interestingly, Sayer's account was hacked right after Elon retweeted his post raising awareness to this. Under The UK's Investigatory Powers Act 2016, Apple was served a technical capability notice or TCN, forcing them to create a backdoor for encrypted iCloud data. This is not limited to UK users. As we said before, it actually applies worldwide, meaning your private files are at risk no matter where you live. Apple is legally forbidden from revealing this order. If Apple even acknowledges that The UK issued this demand, they could face criminal charges. This is a secret government order with global consequences. And it's not just about The UK, although they are leading the charge in threatening citizens in other countries for violating British censorship laws. You would remember the threats that came from The UK Police Commissioner where they said that they would threaten to extradite and jail US citizens over their online posts. Now Apple's choices are to either comply and weaken encryption globally or refuse and withdraw services from The UK. WhatsApp and Signal faced similar threats last year and vowed to leave The UK rather than compromise security. And this was, of course, after The UK passed the Online Safety Act, bill or The UK Online Safety Bill. Encryption protects financial data and health records and personal security, for example, where you live or work, and also private conversations. So this matters for everyone. Governments always say they need backdoors for national security, but history shows they're just used for mass surveillance. And once a backdoor exists, hackers, rogue employees, and other governments will find it. The UK is trying to dominate the global surveillance and censorship landscape. UK is obviously part of Five Eyes, but notably, The US, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand have supported strong encryption to mitigate cyber threats. But The UK stands alone in its war on encryption. And it's not just about encryption, though. It is about control. And governments worldwide are criminalizing dissent and censoring free speech using tech companies as their enforcement arms. And this ties into The UK's broader globally orchestrated census ship agenda, which is the online safety bill. It criminalizes encrypted messaging and forces platforms to scan private messages. The Digital Services Act in the EU gives governments the power to shut down online content they don't like, and leaked US UK documents show direct coordination between UK intelligence and the Biden administration to censor online speech. So, obviously, Apple has a very difficult decision to make, and in fact, they have made one. Sayagyi has an update on this as well as the backstory. He joins us now. Sayagyi, thank you so much for joining us today. We appreciate you being here. Speaker 1: Thanks for having me. Speaker 0: Well, this story is absolutely shocking along with what happened to you and the update. So pardon me. We've just gone through a bit of a backstory there about what the UK government wanted access to. And, really, this all started with the Online Safety Act of 2023, and they've been very, you know, incrementally creeping into people's lives. But now we have an update as to Apple's response. Talk us through it. Speaker 1: Well, you know, we had a situation February 8 where The Wall Street Journal published what was supposed to be a very private matter, which was the UK government was compelling Apple to basically create a backdoor so they could access the world's encrypted iCloud data. So any any country in the world, theoretically, the UK government would have had access to the advanced data protection services they offer, which most people don't use, but at least gave users the ability to have their key stored offline. So, you know, you don't have to trust that Apple or a government is playing by the rules and keeping your data safe and private. Speaker 0: Right. And so Apple wasn't even allowed to talk about this. And then The UK sorry. Apple could've was was given two options, basically. Do they just withdraw all of their services altogether out of The UK, or do they remove advanced data protection? So talk to us about the response from Apple. Speaker 1: Yeah. The crazy thing is, right, The UK's investigatory powers act of 02/2016 basically enabled them to say, Apple, you cannot even share the fact that we're gonna basically force you to create a backdoor into the world's ostensibly encrypted data. So it was leaked, and, thankfully, The Wall Street Journal got it out. In fact, as you know, on February 8, Elon retweeted my post about it because he said this is crazy. This is absolutely insane because people just don't realize that the governments of the world have this ability, and The UK is obviously the one leading the charge as far as tyrannical overreach and and laying claim to your communications as well as actually adjudicating and criminalizing certain speech, which were is protected here in this country. But their UK online safety bill actually gives them, in theory, extradition power so they could basically say, as a US citizen, you're violating our UK speech laws, and we're gonna prosecute you prosecute you. They even stated that recently. A UK Police Commissioner threatened to extradite US citizens over online posts. He said, we'll come after you. Speaker 0: Yes. Yes. I I remember that. And then The US response was basically shove it. We have a First Amendment. But, you know, other people across the world don't have those same protections, so they were talking about extraditing people from other countries as well. And, of course, we have a precedent set with the case of Julian Assange when it comes to extraditing people to to foreign countries all within this Five Eyes network, it seems. So talk to us about that link and how this is all sort of creeping into that entire Five Eyes network. Speaker 1: Absolutely. So the Five Eyes network is a really big concern here because, essentially, if I'm a US citizen, I go to The UK. At this point, my if I upload something to the cloud, The UK Government has access to all of that. So there's no protection. Now there could have been protection with the advanced data protection services, which are now gone, and The UK can share that with The US, and that's the intelligence sharing agreements among the Five Eyes nations. Right? Australia, New Zealand, Canada, The US, and The UK, essentially violating all of our civil rights, our privacy protections, and our constitution here in The US. So that's been ongoing. Now that this issue has come out to the forefront, I think it's really important for people to appreciate how important, for example, x is in helping to wrench back some of these rights and give us a platform to speak truthfully. That said, they're noting everything that's being said, and they're trying to use that as a way to essentially, again, criminalize free speech. Speaker 0: Yes. You're right. And it's kind of a double edged sword because what you say will be used against you. But at the same time, if you don't speak about it, then it'll be used against you anyway. So the the I for for me, the option's always bravery. But I'm interested in your thoughts about how Apple responded because they really were faced with these two very difficult options. And, essentially, people are saying they should have just pulled out their service from The UK, and people would have been outraged at this. And then they could have, you know, protested and maybe repealed some of these laws or, you know, whatever measures the the citizens of The UK could have taken are now essentially being taken away from them. They don't even have an option for privacy, albeit the advanced data protection was not used that much. But without that, then, essentially, there's no encrypt encryption anyway, so it kind of allows governments to use the data anyway now. Speaker 1: Yeah. Exactly. So WhatsApp and Signal already threatened to leave The UK if something similar was forced upon them. And so I think Apple made the right decision. If they had pulled all iCloud services from The UK, I think that would have probably crashed their civilization for quite some time. But I do think that they may have not done a good enough job of of really pushing back and and speaking openly about this because the gag order, you know, that that is imposed upon them is so egregious that they they would have potentially given access to the world's encrypted data and violated the law if they spoke up about it. Well, at this point, you know, we had to all face being deplatformed or worse by speaking up about some of the nightmares that unfolded with the COVID, you know, you know, pandemic, if you will. And now entire big tech corporations, multinationals are having to do the same as well. So it's really quite a moment for us all to be in the same you know, we're in the same boat here. We all have to do something, corporations, individuals, to stop, as you said, bravery is the solution, this insane reenactment of seditious libel. You know? The crown is literally trying to exert total control over the world and over speech and turning it into a weapon against the people, that's similar to having your tongue cut out or your head cut off for speaking against the government narrative. You know? That's where we're at right now. Speaker 0: We are. The and we see, you know, insane laws across every single western nation except The US, really. Australia's recent hate speech laws, now they're bringing in anti vilification laws across states. Basically, now if someone says something that someone deems offensive, they can go to prison. There is a new, bill that was introduced again without debate. Seven years mandatory sentence if you say something, quote, unquote, reckless. It's it's it's really unbelievable. And what's interesting about this UK case, Sayer, is that The UK Investigatory Powers Act of 02/2016 was used in order for the British government to issue this secret order to Apple that they weren't even allowed to talk about. What what I find so fascinating about this is how long this has been in the works. That means that back in 02/2016, someone, some lawmaker said, you know, we're gonna be able to use this legislation later to weaponize. Look how look how far ahead they planned. This is nine years ago. And so I think the the point is that people really need to pay attention to some of these laws that are being introduced. You and I have previously spoken about the COSA legislation in The United States. We have to be aware of these laws and oppose them so that they can't be weaponized against us nine years later. Speaker 1: Absolutely. I'm glad you bring a COSA because it turns out that one of the primary proponents and, if you will, backdoor architects of COSA is the same organization that was behind the online safety bill, which is the Center for Countering Digital Hate. So, basically, this organization, their CEO, Imram Ahmed, literally was found in a leaked memo to have been involved in setting a black ops, these are his words, on a presidential candidate, which is RFK junior, are now acting, you know, HHS secretary. That is such an egregious thing for for it to have been discovered. In fact, CCDH was also involved in placing political operatives in this country through Morgan McSweeney, their founder, who was a a, you know, adviser to Kirstarmer as well as to the to Harris. So we have the infiltration of our, you know, election integrity, you know, political process that that actually goes back to 02/2021. This is the one report that has not been discussed in the mainstream media that, thankfully, because of your journalism and Vigilant Fox and others, the information is getting out. But there was an America First legal lawsuit against the CDC which discovered that in 02/2021, the UK's counter disinformation unit gave a interagency master class on censorship, right, to the US National Security Council's interagency policy committee. The FBI, CISA was there, USAID, army, navy. I mean, you you can't make this stuff up. And they literally decided they were gonna deploy what is essentially a weapons grade AI system that was, used in, for example, Twitter Twitter one point o to, automatically, track, you know, the the speech of every single user and then start start associating terms like questioning mass with the word Nazi, basically labeling that anti Semitic speech, and then just deplatforming people automatically. Anyone with 5,000 followers or less. This was going on. Millions of Americans had their speech suppressed and their, you know, behavior tracked. It's probably still in the dossier somewhere, right, by the UK government. They literally infected our executive branch and then deployed these weapons grade systems in the big tech stack that essentially violated the rights of all Americans, not just the so called disinfo dozen, which I'm proud to be on the list now. And so this is what was going on. They were literally trying to take over our government. They succeeded in large part, but now, of course, as we can see, there was a huge mandate of the people. We have a new administration. We even have an executive order now protecting us against this very thing, thankfully. Speaker 2: Yes. Speaker 1: So we are turning the tide, But thanks to reporting like this, the context is global. There was in that PowerPoint, it was stated clearly there were 20 plus bilateral engagements with countries, including the Five Eyes network. It was also g seven in order to implement a global plan to shut down free speech and do exactly what we're observing the UK government to be doing right now. Speaker 0: Yes. It's really interesting, and I think a a lot of people are starting to realize just how much the UK government had to do with all of this. The the report that you're talking about being a crucial part during COVID, just how deeply involved they were with the censorship. You just look at, they them deploying members of their own government to come to The US during election season to lobby for Kamala Harris. I still think that's foreign interference. I I don't understand how that was allowed to occur. But, you know, it's it's one thing to show support. It's another thing to go and actively lobby. I mean, anyway, I just wanna know from you about this hack that you experienced right after. So so you tweet this information. It gets shared by Elon Musk. I think it had 18,000,000 views or or if I'm not mistaken. And then you get hacked almost immediately after. Speaker 1: It was crazy. That morning, I just happened to be looking at my phone twenty three seconds after he reposted the story that we're discussing. And within a matter of a few minutes, I had on my account these strange crypto posts. You know, it was promoting some kind of, like, scam coin. And I I quickly went in, changed my settings, was able to get the password to change, and somehow recovered my account. But just few minutes before that, I had just finished the, process of getting my own advanced data protection services activated through my phone because I didn't even know it existed either until the story came up. It turns out my partner is a UK citizen, And when she confirmed that she was the, you know, the backup to my account, somehow my account got hacked right at that moment. So I think it had to do with that, and it's very strange, right, that it had to do with my private key being transmitted basically to a UK citizen, and suddenly my account was hacked. It hasn't happened in fifteen years. Speaker 0: Wow. Speaker 1: I've been on Twitter for fifteen years. Speaker 0: That is that is absolutely fascinating. And it's interesting because, you know, you say it's a whole bunch of crypto scammers we know full well. I mean okay. We theorize full well that intelligence agencies, and governments are utilizing bots and scammer accounts to actually target dissidents. This is one of their ways. You know, you post something controversial, and immediately you have bots in your replies or liking your stuff to suppress your content. This is a this is a known tactic. In in my opinion, we don't have hard evidence for it, but it's a clear pattern that a lot of users have reported. So I wonder whether it was the fact that you were drawing attention to this that maybe, some shady characters were involved in that. Very, very interesting. Well, Sayar, as you mentioned, the tide is really turning, and more and more people are growing aware of this. What should people be doing now? Speaker 1: Well, we have legislation in this country that's modeled after The UK online safety bill and the EU Digital Services Act, which basically strips from us the privacy protections and rights that we have that are conferred to us by our beautiful constitution. So, unfortunately, Linda and Elon have actually endorsed the latest kids online safety bill even though the Center for Countering Digital Hate, which Elon is suing, right, and who's you know, tried to make it their purpose to destroy myself and other Americans for speaking up. They actually don't seem to realize that they are part of the agenda, which was revealed in the black ops memo, kill Elon's Twitter being the top line item for the year, and Speaker 2: then Speaker 1: trigger legislative regulation right underneath. This is actually part of that agenda, and there's about eight bills sponsored right now which would strip our basic rights under the ages of where you need to protect protect children, right, from from online harm. That is the way in which they have tried to legislate, lobby, affect PR, which is, again, CCDH is an unregistered foreign agent at the very least for the fact that that is their intention. They've made it very clear, and they're being allowed to run rogue. Last thing I'll say on that is that Imran Ahmed is supposed to receive an award by the Elevate Foundation Prize in Miami, May Twelfth To The Fourteenth. Three Hundred Thousand Dollars unrestricted and this prestigious prize for doing what? It's just amazing that they're basically getting replatformed in this country when they're subject to all of these congressional inquiries, lawsuits, DOJ complaints. This this is absurd. I really hope that people can sign the petition I put together, which is to oppose this absurd aggrandizement of someone who has completely attempted to annihilate our freedoms here in this country. Speaker 0: Where do people find that petition? Speaker 1: That's actually on change.org, and I I can give you a link to it. And it's, you know, just absurd that this would be allowed to happen, and that organization would would confer this kind of prestige and just shower him with cash for essentially targeting our our own political candidates and interfering with our elections. I mean, it's really ridiculous. Speaker 0: Yes, please. If you send that link, we'll make sure to share it around as well when we post this so that people can actually get involved. We we've gotta stay on top of this, say, what just happened in The UK is absolutely egregious. But, really, there are a lot of bad actors everywhere in the world that are trying to do the same thing to every country. Essentially, they wanna erase privacy, make everything the government basically invade every area of your lives, big tech invade every area of your lives, and we can't allow that to happen. Thank you so much. Saya, please let people know where they can follow you. Speaker 1: Thanks so much. Yeah. Basically, I still do most of my reporting GreenMedInfo.com. And, of course, on X, you can find me, Sayer G. I love to post these sorts of updates in real time. Speaker 0: Fantastic. Well, that is the X account at Sayer G, and the links for his websites are on there. Saya, thank you so much for your time. We really appreciate you being here. Speaker 1: Thanks so much, and I I really appreciate the work you're doing to, re replatform the Fifth Estate so that we can continue to have actual free speech in this country and the world. So thank you for that. Speaker 0: Appreciate you. Talk soon. Thanks. Well, we are very grateful for people like Sayagyi who are committed to bringing the truth and building a better future for humanity. And speaking of building a better future, our food supply is absolutely crucial to achieving that goal. Did you know that over 85% of the grass fed beef in stores is imported? That's because the country of origin labeling law was repealed in 2015. So now meat can be packaged here in The US and earn a product of USA label even if it was born, raised, and harvested overseas. And the truth is much of the meat on the grocery store shelves is filled with things you don't want, from antibiotics, hormones, questionable origins, and even harmful seed oils. But at Good Ranchers, transparency isn't just a buzzword. It is a promise. All products at Good Ranchers have trustworthy ingredients. Their meat is born, raised, and harvested right here in The USA, so you know exactly where it comes from. It's free from hidden additives. There are no antibiotics ever, no added hormones, and no seed oils. Just one simple ingredient that you can read, and that's meat. Jermaine Gill, the chief growth officer of Good Ranches, explains what you need to know about the current state of the meat market. He joins us now. Jermaine, thank you so much for joining us today. We appreciate you being here. Speaker 2: Yeah. Thank you, Maria. Anytime we get a chance to, you know, talk about Good Ranchers and talk about agriculture, here at Good Ranchers, we always always wanna take that opportunity. So thank you, and thank you for being an advocate for, the local farms and ranches here in The US. I know it's important to you. It's important subject to us, so thank you. Speaker 0: It's absolutely important to me. This is preserving our food supply and the integrity of our food supply is paramount, And I don't think people really realize that until the food supply actually is at risk. And it is at risk all over the world. There is an attack specifically on farmers. There's an attack on meat, on protein. And so we wanna talk about, the integrity as well of the meat that people are getting when they go to good ranches. This is this is so important. So talk to us about the fact that when people go to the supermarket, they don't actually know for sure that their meat is coming from America. Speaker 2: Yeah. In 2015, the US government passed a country of origin labeling law that says that it's called the coal law. So it says that beef and pork in The US doesn't have to actually be born and raised, harvested here to be called product of The USA. So you can see that a stamp on some ground beef, and it'll have the American flag, and it says product USA. All it has to do is be further processed here in the country. So that means that it can be born, raised, harvested in another country, you know, Mexico, Uruguay, Latin America, South America. Those are the big places that we see a lot. Canada too. We see a lot of beef imported in from those other countries. And then it's either, you know, processed, meaning, like, cutting the steaks or ground up here in The US, and it now becomes called the product of The USA. Yeah. So, I mean, it's kinda it's very misleading. Right? Because, honest you know, The US is the best grower of beef chicken pork in the world. Right? We do the best job. We set all of the standards for animal husbandry, animal right, how we treat the animal, all of these things. You know, The US Agriculture is when it sets the standard for those things. And and so we pride ourselves on being the best growers. And it's kinda sad to see that because of this law, there's you know, almost 3,000,000,000 pounds of of beef have been imported into The US Wow. Over the or, like, last 2024. And so the regular American consumer doesn't even know. Right? They they trust that little American flag, that product USA labeling. And then in a bind, they don't realize, you know, that they can't tell where the meat has come from. That's why I had good ranch go ahead. I'm sorry. Go ahead. Speaker 0: Well, no. I I just wanted to say this is so, so important. People need to realize how how vital this is because we recently have an example out of The UK domain where there was a huge backlash over Beauvais ten. Now for people that aren't aware of that, this is can be a very, very dangerous additive, and the studies initial studies show that it can cause things like infertility and maybe even cancer. And so there was a backlash in The UK over this being inside dairy products. And so what they started to do was hide the the manufacturer, so from other products so that people wouldn't be aware that they were purchasing something that had beauveur in it, and you guarantee there's no beauveur in the meat. Right? Speaker 2: Yeah. No Beauvaeh. Yeah. We we've worked really hard, and and so our our our founder has been in Corley Spell. When they started the company, they started out of the need and desire to know where their where their meat was coming from. Right? They had started a family, and they started to do some more research and digging into, like, what the meat industry looked like in The US. And so out of the desire for a clean product, vaccine free products, products that they know that they could trust and that they could feed their family, that's where Good Ranchers came from. And so the heart and soul of who we are is it's two parts. Right? It's it's one, we want we always wanna support the American farm and rancher. I mean, I I I know I don't know if you know this, but, you know, ranches and farms, the small local are closing left and right because of imported beef and this, you know, big farm, big beef industry, big meat industry. So, one, we wanna support those guys. That's part of our mission. It's part of our heart. We wanna, you know, bring advocacy to them. We wanna tell their stories. We wanna be able to support them. Right? And so we've done that over the last seven years of of being in business. We've really done that. The other piece to the heart and soul of who we are is this the idea of a clean product, product that you can trust. And, you know, a hundred years ago that's when I was just telling this story to somebody earlier today. About a hundred years ago, if you were, you know, here in The US, you wanted to get, you know, chicken or beef, you would just, you know, go down the street to your local rancher and farm. You would meet the rancher and farm. Right? You would set up some you'd buy directly from them or from, like, a small butcher shop that had that connection. Well, as cities have grown, we've lost that connection. Right? We're we're no longer connected to our our food supply. Right? We we don't know where it's coming from. We don't know what is and a lot of us don't have time to really go and do the research. That's why, you know, trusting a company like Good Ranchers, we go out there. We do the research for you. We make sure it's a clean product. We make sure it's a product that we would feed ourselves. Been in correlating myself. We do the same thing. There we would never sell anything that we wouldn't feed to our own family. And so, you know, you don't have the time to go find those ranchers and those farmers, and let us go do the sourcing for you. That that's sort of that's that is who we are. Right? So let us do the sourcing. Let's make sure that the product's clean, the cleanest it can be, so that you can know and have trust that what you're feeding your family is it's it's supporting local farms and ranches in The US, and it's a clean product. Speaker 0: Well, this is what what you do at Good Ranchers is so important, Jermaine, because we have to keep those local farmers and those local ranches alive. Like I said, there is a sort of coordinated global attack on them. And whilst that may be different under the new administration, we have to keep their business going. We have to you know, we hope to see changes, and we hope to see farmers supported, but we have to keep that momentum going because you just look at how, over the years, not supporting local farms and, you know, just buying from supermarkets where you can't be certain of where your meat is from, and it's all sort of, you know, big business, big ag rather than the the grassroots people that actually care about the quality of the meat. Over the years, that's allowed many of them to be attacked, to be overregulated, you know, with you know, if you don't upgrade to this smart ag, which costs millions of dollars, you're gonna be shut down. We really have to put in effort to advocate for these businesses because this is our food. This is our strength. This is what keeps our families healthy. And let me just say, Jermaine, I'm gonna tell you, you know, I'm from Australia originally. I'm in I'm in America now, but when I was there, we we have incredible meat in Australia, and I I partnered as well with a company that does similar things to what Good Ranches does in Australia, and their meat was fantastic. And I came to The US, and I just couldn't find tasty meat anywhere. And then I tried Good Ranches, and it is good. It is very, very delicious. I will tell you that openly. And so I I think it's it's a fantastic option for people. What what are some other really important points for you? Speaker 2: Yeah. I mean, for us, you know you know, tariffs is a big thing that everybody are talking about right now. Right? And so, you know, one of the things that we we drew a line in the sand very early on in the company was that not only was our meat gonna be born, raised, and harvested in The US, but our whole supply chain was gonna be a % US based. So that's why when you're gonna see rising cost of meat products in the grocery store, the butcher shop, other online meat companies that are importing products in from overseas, you're not gonna see that same rising cost with us because we've we've already secured our whole supply chain to be a % American. So, you know, as you start to get that, like, pricing sensitivity, right, people are gonna start and and and we're we see it now. Right? We talk about it. It's all over the news. Right? Price of eggs are increasing. Price of ground beef is increasing. Everything. You're gonna see it we see it all over the place now. You know, when you buy from good ranchers, you can be secure that your price is gonna be it's gonna stay the same for why you're with us as well as you know, we're always we always wanna give back. We always wanna give value back to our customers. So, like, one of the things that we're running right now is, like, free meat for a year. Right? So, you know, free you get to choose ground beef, chicken, salmon, whatever, you know, whatever product you want. And we're gonna give you a portion of that for free for a year. So, you know, not like I said, we're we're trying to give back to not just local farms and ranches, but to the American family. Right? Or, you know, part of our goal is to bring people to the table. And so we know that, you know, there is some fear or, you know, hesitancy there with pricing and concern that the price of beef and price of meat is gonna continue to rise. You know, with good ranchers, we're here to help. Right? And so we've kind of got ahead of the whole tariff thing. Right? And there's this, you know, movement to bring American meat, right, to buy American. And so, that's what we've been doing since we started. Right? And so we're we're happy to be a part of the solution, right, and a part of the answer. Speaker 0: Well, I'm really grateful for that. I I applaud your mission. I really do. We have to support local farms, local branches. This is one of the most important things that we have to do because our food supply is at the core of our health. Like, it's it's that simple. Yeah. And so and I really I Speaker 2: will say I will say one. Speaker 0: Go on. Speaker 2: Yeah. I'll say one thing. You know, you don't have to sacrifice quality and taste for clean and and, you know, chopping your values. Right? Like, our prod like you said it earlier, I I I mean, I've we've had beef from all over now. The best. You know? And I will hands down put Good Ranchers a Good Ranchers product up against any other thing. You know, we we not only are we, like, trying to source the cleanest thing, but we age all of our beef, you know, a minimum of 28. Our chicken is all small, but we have a internal saying, and it's kinda funny. People will come for the steak, but they stay for the chicken because our chicken is just so phenomenal. Speaker 0: Is good. Speaker 2: You think, like, all chicken is right. It's all made the same, but our chicken just you you can taste the difference. It's it's more tender. It's got a little bit of a different flavor profile to it. It's a smaller it's not those gigantic pterodactyl sized chicken breasts you're gonna see at the grocery store. It's pumped full of hormones. It's a smaller chicken breast. So, like, you know, it it's phenomenal. I I I would just say our our product, you don't have to sacrifice quality or taste. Speaker 0: Well, what I really Speaker 2: and and and do right. Speaker 0: Absolutely. And what I really love as well is that it comes in portions. So when you're buying meat from the supermarket, you might get a whole bunch of unwanted parts that you're paying for but throwing out where Good Ranchers gets all those portions for you. You're actually getting what you pay for, And then it's easier for meal prep as well. So there's just so many benefits, Jermaine. I I, again, love the meat. I'm I'm going to be regularly buying it. I recently tried it. I love it. It's great. You can taste the the quality of the meat. And just knowing as well that we're supporting local local farmers and ranchers is number one. This needs to become, you know, really the the motto of America going forward. The motto of every country, really. You have to support your farmers and your ranchers. You have to. It's it's it's paramount to our existence. And so and and the added benefit of the value add that you're giving to your customers as well because you're not just giving back to the businesses, but also to your customers is just wonderful. So thank you so much for your time today, Jermaine. I really appreciate it. This is how you can be sure of the safety and the quality of your meat by purchasing from Good Ranchers Direct. Thank you so much, Jermaine. Speaker 2: Thank you. Thanks for having us. And, again, like I said, Maria, thank you for your support. Thank you for, highlighting the needs of us ranchers, farmers out there. And, you know, you we cannot stress this enough. Like, securing a great of your food supply, understanding where your meat come from, and finding a trusted provider is so important. It's it you know, we it's like we're feeding our future, really, honestly. Right? Because, you know, what we put in our bodies is important. So thank you for trusting Good Ranchers. Appreciate it. Thanks so much. Speaker 0: Appreciate you. Thank you. Speaker 2: Thanks. You have a great day. Speaker 0: Huge thanks to Jermaine Gill and Good Ranchers for sponsoring the show and offering a truly clean, transparent meat service that supports our values and the good of humanity. And speaking of clean food, I have exciting news. Good Ranch's seed oil free chicken nuggets are back. Made with whole cuts of chicken, they're gluten free, allergen safe, and packed with delicious clean flavor. You can subscribe to a box or add them to any order at GoodRanches.com/VNN. But here's the best part. Good Ranches delivers straight to your door, skipping the grocery store and offering farm to table transparency. Right now, when you subscribe to any box at Good Ranches, you'll get free ground beef, chicken breasts, or wild caught salmon for a full year plus $25 off when you use the code VNN at checkout. Don't miss out on the pleasure of eating top quality meat. Go to GoodRanchers.com/VNN and use code VNN to get free meat for a year and $25 off your order. We love their services, and we think you will too.

Sign the Petition I am one of the many who have experienced defamation, deplatforming, and lawfare at the hands of Imran Ahmed and his organization, CCDH. They have targeted me and twelve others they labeled the "disinformation dozen" for merely expressing narratives different from theirs, challenging our very right to free speech, fairness, and open debate. The Elevate Prize Foundation's decision to award Imran Ah change.org

@HolaBackupFiJC - HolaBackup

SITREP: Apple has completely removed the ‘keyword search’ function from my archives now. That’s a whole new level of desperation.🤣 https://t.co/lNIuugxK76

@TheActaFist777 - TheFringe 💫🏴🔥🤍🔥

National Center for Missing & Exploited Children.💥 NCMEC. 💥 http://www.missingkids.org

National Center for Missing & Exploited Children As the nation's nonprofit clearinghouse and comprehensive reporting center for all issues related to the prevention of and recovery from child victimization, NCMEC leads the fight against abduction, abuse, and exploitation - because every child deserves a safe childhood. Hope is why we're here. missingkids.org

@TheActaFist777 - TheFringe 💫🏴🔥🤍🔥

LIFETOUCH provides free child ID cards->> National Center for Missing & Exploited Children. 💥💥💥 LifeTouch staff (24/7) rapid response team providing current photos of missing children to ->> NCMEC.💥 missingkids.org/supportus/our-…

@MeghanWalsh_ - Meghan Walsh

And Partner of NCMEC...

@MeghanWalsh_ - Meghan Walsh

And Partner of NCMEC...

@TheActaFist777 - TheFringe 💫🏴🔥🤍🔥

National Center for Missing & Exploited Children. Est in (1984) by US Congress. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Center_for_Missing_%26_Exploited_Children

National center for missing & exploited children - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org

@TheActaFist777 - TheFringe 💫🏴🔥🤍🔥

U.S. Congress passed the "Missing Children's Assistance Act". Est ->> National Resource Center & Clearinghouse on Missing & Exploited Children. (1984). Center formed by Revé & John Walsh Officially opened by Prez Ronald Reagan in->> White House ceremony

@TheActaFist777 - TheFringe 💫🏴🔥🤍🔥

June 13, 1984- the National Center for Missing & Exploited Children was opened by President Ronald Reagan in a White House Ceremony. The national 24 hour toll free missing children’s hotline 1-800-THE-LOST opened as well. web.archive.org/web/2012102901…

@TheActaFist777 - TheFringe 💫🏴🔥🤍🔥

Teddy Ruxpin "Official Spokesbear" for the center (80s). James Brady Prez press secretary (nickname bear), wounded in (1981) assassination attempt on Prez Reagan, received toy bears as ''get well" gifts. Toy company (Worlds of Wonder) decided to give NCMEC a toy bear mascot 🧸

@TheActaFist777 - TheFringe 💫🏴🔥🤍🔥

"Notable Board & staff members" Dennis Webster DeConcini 💥 John F Clark 💥 (Lockheed) John Edward Walsh Jr💥 (AMW) Karen Tandy 💥 René Walsh 💥 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Walsh_(television_host) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_F._Clark https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dennis_DeConcini

John walsh (television host) - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org

John f. clark - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org

Dennis deconcini - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org

@TheActaFist777 - TheFringe 💫🏴🔥🤍🔥

Belgian Prime Minister Dehaene visited NCMEC & asked to set up NCMEC in Brussels. NCMEC agreed to help. Then other countries visited NCMEC. NCMEC board authorized creation of ICMEC (1997). 1st meeting was 1998. ICMEC officially launched at British Embassy in Washington DC.

@TheActaFist777 - TheFringe 💫🏴🔥🤍🔥

Official Public Launch of ICMEC British Embassy Washington D.C. (April 1999) Lady Catherine Meyer Hillary Rodham Clinton 💥 Cherie Booth Blai web.archive.org/web/2014120517…

@TheActaFist777 - TheFringe 💫🏴🔥🤍🔥

London Launch of ICMEC (June 1999) Sir Richard Branson 💥(Virgin Group) web.archive.org/web/2014120517…

@TheActaFist777 - TheFringe 💫🏴🔥🤍🔥

NCMEC & Duracell 💥 Produced a children's book 📖 The Great Tomato Adventure: A Story About Smart Safety Choices (2007).

@TheActaFist777 - TheFringe 💫🏴🔥🤍🔥

The foreword was written by Jada Pinkett Smith. (NCMEC/Duracell) web.archive.org/web/2007062322… (2007).

@TheActaFist777 - TheFringe 💫🏴🔥🤍🔥

NCMEC & Duracell's Power of Parents Launch (May 2, 2007) Preschool of America, New York City, Jada Pinkett Smith Kara Salzillo https://www.gettyimages.ca/detail/news-photo/jada-pinkett-smith-during-jada-pinkett-smith-ncmec-and-news-photo/106204878

Jada Pinkett Smith during Jada Pinkett Smith, NCMEC and Duracell's... Jada Pinkett Smith during Jada Pinkett Smith, NCMEC and Duracell's Power of Parents Launch - May 2, 2007 at Preschool of America in New York City, New York, United States. Get premium, high resolution news photos at Getty Images gettyimages.ca

@TheActaFist777 - TheFringe 💫🏴🔥🤍🔥

Richard Branson (VirginGroup) Eve Branson, Board of International Center for Missing & Exploited Children. (ICMEC)http://www.icmec.org Senator Denis DeConcini (NCMEC) April (2014). flickr.com/photos/5086310…

International Centre for Missing & Exploited Children We advocate, innovate, train, and collaborate to protect the world’s children from abduction, sexual abuse, and exploitation. icmec.org

@TheActaFist777 - TheFringe 💫🏴🔥🤍🔥

💥 APPLE & NCMEC 💥 VP acknowledges concerns about new scanning feature/internal memo Apple plans to scan images on iPhones & other devices before they upload to iCloud. If it finds an image that matches one in the database of the (NCMEC), https://www.theverge.com/2021/8/6/22612934/apple-vp-memo-concerns-privacy-new-scanning-photos-images-ios

Apple VP acknowledges concerns about new scanning feature in internal memo An Apple executive wrote in an internal memo that there were “misunderstandings” about a new policy that will have the company scan iOS devices for images of child abuse and exploitation. theverge.com

@TheActaFist777 - TheFringe 💫🏴🔥🤍🔥

Apple Wants to Protect Children. But It’s Creating Serious Privacy Risks. nytimes.com/2021/08/11/opi… https://t.co/BB6e56Msdm

@TheActaFist777 - TheFringe 💫🏴🔥🤍🔥

💥💥💥 Partners💥💥💥 National Center for Missing & Exploited Children. (NCMEC). Adobe Amazon💥 Cellebrite Google💥 Griffeye Intel Meta💥 Microsoft💥 Oak Foundation Old Navy Palantir💥 Versign Zoom missingkids.org/supportus/our-… https://t.co/J8Brtl2FWX

@EvaVlaar - Eva Vlaardingerbroek

Yesterday I got a verified threat notification from Apple stating they detected a mercenary spyware attack against my iPhone. We’re talking spyware like Pegasus. All I know for sure right now is that someone is trying to intimidate me. I have a message for them: It won’t work. https://t.co/mLPVyttFwm

@EvaVlaar - Eva Vlaardingerbroek

Posting the iMessage with the threat notification I got from @Apple here (4 out of 5 screenshots) https://t.co/sbYWkfMr0A

@EvaVlaar - Eva Vlaardingerbroek

And the last screenshot (5 out of 5) + the initial email from the verified email address and the confirmation on http://account.apple.com They’re saying they can’t tell are unable to provide me with more information. https://t.co/YhsUPbwX0W

@TRHLofficial - The Redheaded libertarian

Apple turned on some Big Brother shit in their latest updates. Here is how you turn it all off. https://t.co/f2G0LkyiLl

@DNIGabbard - DNI Tulsi Gabbard

Over the past few months, I’ve been working closely with our partners in the UK, alongside @POTUS and @VP, to ensure Americans' private data remains private and our Constitutional rights and civil liberties are protected. As a result, the UK has agreed to drop its mandate for Apple to provide a "back door" that would have enabled access to the protected encrypted data of American citizens and encroached on our civil liberties.

@MarioNawfal - Mario Nawfal

🇺🇸🇬🇧 4CHAN TO UK: SCREW YOUR FINE - WE’RE AMERICANS, NOT SUBJECTS The UK’s media nanny Ofcom tried to slap 4chan with a £20K fine (plus daily penalties) under its shiny new Online Safety Act - 4chan’s response? Cry harder. Their attorney called Ofcom’s probe “an illegal campaign of harassment” and reminded them that the First Amendment doesn’t bend for some overreaching British bureaucrat with a clipboard. “Foreign penal fines and censorship codes don’t fly here,” the legal team posted - adding they’re ready to go to U.S federal court and have already briefed American authorities. This is what happens when a country with no free speech tries to lecture the internet: a full-blown diplomatic tantrum over a message board they can’t control. Source: BBC

@MarioNawfal - Mario Nawfal

🇺🇸🇬🇧 X WARNS UK ONLINE SAFETY ACT RISKS GLOBAL CENSORSHIP “As the UK Online Safety Act rolls out, its unintended consequences on freedom of expression are clear: overbroad duties may lead to proactive censorship, harming freedom of expression and innovation. This has a potential to set a precedent for global censorship, threatening privacy and free speech worldwide. X will remain steadfast in our commitment to stand firm against proactive censorship efforts by governments worldwide.” Source: @globalaffairs

@MarioNawfal - Mario Nawfal

🇬🇧 ENGLAND’S CHILDREN’S COMMISSIONER: “OF COURSE, WE NEED AGE VERIFICATION ON VPNS” England’s Children’s Commissioner Rachel de Souza says VPNs let kids dodge the UK’s new Online Safety Act. Her report urges the government to close the loophole with mandatory age checks, https://t.co/GhU4qRdKIt

@IntCyberDigest - International Cyber Digest

‼️ Proton is cancelling journalists by blocking their mail accounts. This has huge consequences for their reputation and for all the people who thought they were safe by avoiding big tech. https://t.co/wvJOCeOZvG

@IntCyberDigest - International Cyber Digest

Little did they know, we all read @phrack zine. @ProtonMail care to comment? https://t.co/ELGQVOwxfx

@IntCyberDigest - International Cyber Digest

Let's not forget when @ProtonPrivacy shared the IP address of a French activist with authorities. The company has widely claimed that it doesn't log users' IP addresses. Weird, huh? https://t.co/gWZ3gpR8Bq

@IntCyberDigest - International Cyber Digest

Care to comment @andyyen?

@shellenberger - Michael Shellenberger

Good god. The Swiss people just approved digital IDs. Australia implemented them in Dec. UK last week. In all 3 nations, deep state-allied politicians are behind them. This is a digital ID/censorship emergency. Please share and reply below with info about other nations. https://t.co/YEgVE4ROdX

@shellenberger - Michael Shellenberger

The deep state swamp creatures know that digital IDs are unpopular and so they are trying to rush them through before anyone realizes what they are doing. The good news is that the more people learn about them the more alarmed they become. Polling in Switzerland showed 60% backed digital IDs which both houses in parliament had already approved. The final vote was just 50.4%. It almost lost. I hope the Swiss people are carefully scrutinizing the vote count. Same dynamic in UK. Opposition to digital IDs is low and will rise. Digital IDs can and must be killed. https://t.co/PFefaMlWdA

@shellenberger - Michael Shellenberger

@sundarpichai @Google UK opposition vs support of digital IDs is 45 to 42. Opponents should be able to drive that opposition number up significantly. It is absolutely essential that the UK kill two-tier @Keir_Starmer plan for digital IDs before they metastasize across the West.

@shellenberger - Michael Shellenberger

From a Swiss source: "Palantir and Mercator sponsored the Yes Campaign. Palantir is a member of Digital Switzerland, alongside other tech companies. Digital Switzerland lobbied for the E-ID/digital ID in Switzerland in this vote.

@shellenberger - Michael Shellenberger

"The NGO called Digital Society Switzerland accepted 750'000 CHF from the Mercator foundation in 2023, and since then they are in favour of digital ID. So, Mercator bascially corrupted Digital Society Switzerland." https://t.co/3Skzsjgte0

@shellenberger - Michael Shellenberger

Palantir set up its European hub in Switzerland. I'm told this was likely to be in EU market and avoid EU regulation. https://t.co/RQyt9Hruzg

@shellenberger - Michael Shellenberger

The totalitarian digital ID scam should bring down every politician who has pushed for it.

@shellenberger - Michael Shellenberger

Source: "Switzerland currently hosts the 'Clube de Berne,' which is the alliance of 27 intelligence Western agencies on surveillance. Geneva is known as 'spy hub.' Snowden was there. Switzerland is similar to Vienna. First they said fake news and now they say it's about child protection."

@shellenberger - Michael Shellenberger

"It's not a coincidence. It's coordinated through Clube de Brune and WEF. They will use digital ID to censor and cancel people. If you don’t have digital ID you won’t be able to use social media platforms because it will be mandatory for platforms to require digital ID. They’re against anonymity, whistle blowers, people with unpopular opinions. Some people are smart and use VPNs so people don't know who they are; they want to stop this. It’s a fight against anonymity. Look at the Pedro Sanchez speech at WEF where he called for 'an end to anonymity on social media.'"

@shellenberger - Michael Shellenberger

Clarification: The British people have not approved digital IDs. PM @Keir_Starmer unilaterally announced they would be required for work. He may have taken an extreme position to make voluntary digital IDs seem reasonable, as other politicians have done https://t.co/ifL7dbFz5n

@shellenberger - Michael Shellenberger

We need digital IDs to halt migration, increase efficiency, & safeguard data, they say. But border control does not require digital IDs and centralizing data is a hacker's dream. The real reason they want digital ID is for billions in fees and the control of our behavior. https://t.co/8jPWnMurnx

@shellenberger - Michael Shellenberger

@Keir_Starmer Frustrating: https://t.co/zDbBS5icAt

@durov - Pavel Durov

🇪🇺 Telegram sent this message to all its users in France regarding Chat Control. People must know the names of those who try to steal their freedoms: Today, the European Union nearly banned your right to privacy. It was set to vote on a law that would force apps to scan every private message, turning everyone’s phone into a spying tool. France led the push for this authoritarian law. Both former and current Interior Ministers, Bruno Retailleau and Laurent Nuñez, supported it. Last March, they declared that police should see French citizens’ private messages. The Republicans and Macron’s Renaissance group voted for it. Such measures are supposed to “fight crime”, but their real target is regular people. It wouldn’t stop criminals — they could just use VPNs or special websites to hide. Officials’ and police messages wouldn’t be scanned either, since the law conveniently exempts them from surveillance. Only YOU — ordinary citizens — would face the danger of your private messages and photos being compromised. Today, we defended privacy: Germany’s sudden stand saved our rights. But freedoms are still threatened. While French leaders push for total access to private messages, the basic rights of French people — and all Europeans — remain in danger.

@XPHOENIXDRAGON - 𝐏𝐇𝐎𝐄𝐍𝐈𝐗🐦‍🔥𝐃𝐑𝐀𝐆𝐎𝐍

🚨🫆NEW LAW gives the government access to all the data on our devices, including cell phones, smart watches, smart cars/tv's, anything "Smart" even alarm clocks, home security apps❓️ https://t.co/9t3yJb3GxK

@newstart_2024 - Camus

A software developer is issuing an urgent warning about Digital ID, and the technical reasons they reveal are more alarming than anyone could imagine. This isn't just about a card on your phone; it's about the architecture of total surveillance. We've all heard the concerns about social credit scores and carbon tracking, but the developer highlights two critical technical dominoes that have already fallen, paving the way for Digital ID's control grid: 1️⃣ The Fall of Digital Privacy: Apple, long a bastion of user security, has reportedly been forced to disable end-to-end encryption for iPhones in the UK. This foundational layer of privacy, which even law enforcement struggled to bypass, is now being removed at the government's request. The pretext? National security. The implication? Unprecedented access to your private life. 2️⃣ The Rise of Mass Surveillance: "Chat Control" is a terrifying new paradigm. Imagine an AI on your device tracking every single keystroke—every message, note, and journal entry—in real-time. This data isn't private; it's categorized, analyzed, and sent to remote servers. The goal? To build a detailed profile of every citizen for those "at the top." The developer's conclusion is chilling: Digital ID is not a standalone tool. It is the essential key that unlocks this entire system of control. It's the first domino that must be pushed for the rest of the surveillance state to fall into place. This is a technical blueprint for tyranny, and the groundwork is being laid now. Awareness is our first and most powerful line of defense. Share this warning. Understand what we are opposing. The time to act is before the system goes live.

@BasilTheGreat - Basil the Great

🚨AUSTRALIA REMOVES ANONYMITY ONLINE Victoria State are pressing ahead with new laws meaning online accounts will no longer be anonymous to Police The UK will follow suit soon I have no doubt There is no freedom of speech anymore https://t.co/2bJCQl6Uai

@matthew_d_green - Matthew Green

Microsoft is handing over Bitlocker keys to law enforcement. https://www.forbes.com/sites/thomasbrewster/2026/01/22/microsoft-gave-fbi-keys-to-unlock-bitlocker-encrypted-data/

Microsoft Gave FBI BitLocker Encryption Keys, Exposing Privacy Flaw The tech giant said providing encryption keys was a standard response to a court order. But companies like Apple and Meta set up their systems so such a privacy violation isn’t possible. forbes.com

@matthew_d_green - Matthew Green

For those who don’t have context, Bitlocker is the built-in drive encryption in Windows. This is supposed to protect the data on your machine from being accessed without authorization. In many configurations, Windows will upload a recovery key to your Microsoft cloud account.

@matthew_d_green - Matthew Green

The problem is that these recovery keys aren’t encrypted end-to-end in a way that Microsoft can’t access. So if law enforcement wants to access your encrypted drive (even without knowing your password) they can just ask Microsoft for the key. And Microsoft will hand it over.

@matthew_d_green - Matthew Green

Once upon a time you could assume (mostly) that any Federal law enforcement agency doing this would be operating within the bounds of the law. Nowadays, who knows. I sure wouldn’t want to be a journalist relying on Bitlocker. https://www.cnn.com/2026/01/21/media/washington-post-hannah-natanson-fbi-doj-devices

The Washington Post demands government return devices seized in raid of reporter’s home | CNN Business The Post is demanding in court that the federal government return electronic devices it seized during last week’s FBI search of reporter Hannah Natanson’s home. cnn.com

@matthew_d_green - Matthew Green

But more broadly, this highlights a fundamental weakness. If MS can easily produce this data to law enforcement, then anyone who compromises their cloud infrastructure (or customer service infrastructure; or can forge a plausible LE request) can potentially access that data.

@matthew_d_green - Matthew Green

It’s 2026 and these concerns have been known for years. Microsoft’s inability to secure critical customer keys is starting to make it an outlier from the rest of the industry.

@JayGenXer - JayGen 𝕏 er🇨🇦

While this focuses on Apple Products, understand that Bill C22 will apply to ALL Manufacturers of ALL DEVICES! TOTALITARIAN ?? https://t.co/CxSVlvMXQh

@America1stLegal - America First Legal

/1🚨🗣️EXCLUSIVE — FOREIGN COLLUSION TO CENSOR AMERICAN SPEECH: New docs from litigation against the CDC reveal the Biden-Harris White House hosted the “Counter Disinformation Unit” from the U.K. gov’t in 2021 to learn about their recommendations to censor speech. 🧵THREAD: https://t.co/bZ9H8gYQec