TruthArchive.ai - Related Post Feed

Posted - August 13, 2023 at 6:28 PM

Saved - August 13, 2023 at 6:59 PM

@BernieSpofforth - Bernie's Tweets

GERMANY- Falling into dictatorship as the ruling party looks to BAN its greatest threat, by calling the AfD a threat to democracy’ The AfDis polling at 21% But the people cannot be allowed to choose the ‘wrong’ leaders. Banning the opposition? This should scare you

@SaiKate108 — Kat A 🌸

Posted - March 25, 2024 at 9:01 AM

Saved - March 25, 2024 at 10:33 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

Germany's AFD party gains momentum as leader Alice Weidel addresses concerns about trust in the government, media, and judiciary. She attributes this to immigration, lockdown policies, vaccine issues, and a shift towards suspicion over the rule of law. Weidel's speech receives enthusiastic applause, marking the start of the AFD's election campaign.

@SaiKate108 - Kat A 🌸

If you wonder why Germany’s AFD party is gathering so much momentum look no further than this recent speech from their leader Alice Weidel. Significantly most Germans no longer trust their Government/Media/Judiciary. Weidel blamed this on unabated immigration, tyrannical policies during lockdown, illegal mandates and failure to take responsibility for the vaccine deaths and injuries. ‘The rule of law has been replaced by the rule of suspicion. And with that the door is open to everything that we can imagine and what we have thought we have long since left behind. And that’s why dear friends we haven’t been moving in the spectrum of left and right for a long time. We’ve been moving in the spectrum between freedom and totalitarianism.’ Her speech was met with rapturous applause 👏

Video Transcript AI Summary

Deutschland erlebt einen starken Vertrauensverlust in Politik und Institutionen. Die Bevölkerung hat Angst um die Zukunft des Landes und kritisiert fehlende Verantwortungsübernahme der Politiker. Es wird die Sorge geäußert, dass Freiheiten eingeschränkt und Denunziantentum gefördert werden. Es wird betont, dass die Deutschen klüger handeln sollten und sich nicht in Richtung Totalitarismus bewegen dürfen. Germany is facing a significant loss of trust in politics and institutions. The population fears for the future of the country and criticizes the lack of responsibility taken by politicians. Concern is expressed about freedoms being restricted and denunciation being promoted. It is emphasized that Germans should act smarter and not move towards totalitarianism.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Unglaublichen Vertrauensverlust konfrontiert. So ein Vertrauensverlust hatten wir noch nie. Ich hab hier mal ein paar Zahlen mitgebracht. Ende des letzten Jahres gab es eine Umfrage, dass drei Viertel der Deutschen keinerlei Vertrauen in Politik, Medien, Kirchen und Gewerkschaften haben, also in die tragenden Säulen unseres Staates. Und wer gehört noch zu den tragenden Säulen Laut INSA hatten neunundsechzig Prozent Angst die Zukunft dieses Landes. Das sind mehr als zwei Drittel. Dreiundsiebzig Prozent halten die Massenzuwanderung für ein wahlentscheidendes Thema, woran das wohl liegen mag. Forsa, nur acht Prozent der deutschen Bevölkerung sehen Deutschland auf einem guten Weg. Nur acht Prozent. Zweiundneunzig Prozent sehen das nicht so. Deutschland ist auf keinem guten Weg. Und diese dramatische Situation haben wir in der Nachkriegsgeschichte noch nie gehabt, diesen allgegenwärtigen Vertrauensverlust in diesem Land. Wenn wir diese dramatischen Zahlen sehen, fragen wir uns, woran liegt das eigentlich? Ich hab mich auch gefragt, woran woran liegt das, dass die Menschen kein Vertrauen mehr haben in unsere Politiker, in die Institutionen unseres Landes und warum so viele Schwarzseen, vor allen Dingen junge Menschen, die Angst, Angst, es geht nicht hier Sorge, die Angst die Zukunft haben. Weil niemand mehr Verantwortung übernimmt für sein Tun. Die Politiker nehmen keine Verantwortung für ihr Tun. Und das ist das, was uns unterscheidet. Wir nehmen, wir übernehmen Verantwortung. Wir wollen sie übernehmen, weil wir nicht, wie Markus Frohenmeier das richtig sagt, in Wahlperioden denken, sondern in Generationen für unsere Kinder- und Enkelkinderpolitik machen. Wer übernimmt Verantwortung über die Coronaimpfung, über die Hauptwirkung oder vielmehr die Nebenwirkung der Coronaimpfung? Wer übernimmt Verantwortung? Wer übernimmt die Verantwortung, Das Herr zweitausendeinundzwanzig, alle Parteien haben Wahlkampf gemacht, gegen die Impfpflicht zu sein. Und urplötzlich, als der Wahltermin durch war, waren alle für die Impfpflicht. Wer übernimmt dafür die Verantwortung? Wer übernimmt die Verantwortung? Wo ist die Überarbeitung, die Wiederaufarbeitung für den Rechtsbruch in diesem Land, für den Verfassungsbruch. Wer übernimmt die Verantwortung für die vielen Senioren und Menschen, die einsam und allein in ihren Pflegeheim war? Wer übernimmt die Verantwortung? Wer übernimmt die Verantwortung für die vielen Impfgeschädigten, die im Rollstuhl sitzen, die gestorben sind? Wer tut das? Wo ist die Aufarbeitung, was an den Schulen passiert ist, an der verlorenen Generation, an den Kindern, die nicht mehr zur Schule gehen muss, konnten und nicht mehr durften, die nicht mehr auf den Fußballplätzen sich treffen durften, die sich nicht mehr draußen treffen dürfen? Wo ist hier die Überarbeitung, die Aufarbeitung, die Verantwortungsübernahme dafür, dass man irgendwelche Kaffeekränzchen von Omas aufgelöst hat, dass der eine Nachbar den anderen verpfiffen hat. Das ist eine Kultur, liebe Freunde, die hieraufgezüchtet wurde, die wir aus längst vergangenen dunklen Zeiten kennen. Und ich hätte mir gewünscht, dass die Deutschen klüger sind nach zwei Diktatoren. Eine Kultur des Denunziantenums. Eine Kultur des Denunziantentums und des Verpfeifens von anderen Menschen, der Freiheitseinschränkung. Und genau das gibt es ja heute, ne. FESASS Gesetz der Demokratieförderung. Da geht es ja auch nichts anderes, dass man verpfiffen wird, dass man auf Verdacht freigestellt wird als Beamter. Damit, was dort in den Coronazeiten aufgemacht wurden wurde, das wird ja jetzt fortgeführt. An die Herrschaft des Rechts ist die Herrschaft des Verdachts getreten und damit ist Tür und Tor geöffnet für alles, was wir uns vorstellen können und was wir gedacht haben, was wir längst hinter uns gelassen haben. Und darum, liebe Freunde, bewegen wir uns schon lange nicht mehr in dem Spektrum zwischen links und rechts. Zwischen Freiheit und Totalitarismus, es ganz klar zu sagen.

@SaiKate108 - Kat A 🌸

https://www.youtube.com/live/YQRSpVJpQzA?si=ioN-_zyhKBk1O-GP The speech was given on the 23 March 2024 and marked the opening of the AFD’s election campaign.

@EvaVlaar — Eva Vlaardingerbroek

Posted - September 30, 2024 at 4:12 PM

Saved - September 30, 2024 at 8:11 PM

@EvaVlaar - Eva Vlaardingerbroek

🇩🇪 40 German parliamentarians have officially filed a motion to BAN the 'Alternative for Germany' party, claiming (surprise, surprise) that @AfD is ''a threat to democracy''. The irony is sickening, but this will only make them stronger. AfD is Germany's only hope. #AfDVerbot https://t.co/wSJyI9m4Ok

@elonmusk — Elon Musk

Posted - December 21, 2024 at 3:18 PM

Saved - December 22, 2024 at 3:03 PM

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

The traditional political parties in Germany have utterly failed the people. 🇩🇪 AfD is the only hope for Germany 🇩🇪

@stclairashley - Ashley St. Clair

Suicide of the West masquerading as “tolerance” https://t.co/rlthT43Bdy

@Inevitablewest — Inevitable West

Posted - December 23, 2024 at 4:51 PM

Saved - December 24, 2024 at 3:36 AM

@Inevitablewest - Inevitable West

AfD leader Alice Weidel holds back tears as she gives passionate speech about the betrayal of the German people. Germany is absolutely heartbroken. https://t.co/yjSKN4qi7d

Video Transcript AI Summary

Wir fordern Veränderungen in unserem Land, damit wir wieder in Sicherheit leben können. Es darf nicht sein, dass wir um Mütter trauern müssen, die auf so sinnlose und brutale Weise ihr Leben verlieren. We demand changes in our country so that we can live in safety again. It should not be that we mourn mothers who lose their lives in such senseless and brutal ways.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Freunde, ich wiederhole es noch mal. Wir wollen, dass sich endlich etwas ändert in unserem Land und dass wir endlich wieder in Sicherheit leben können, dass wir nie wieder mit einer Mutter trauern müssen, die aus so eine sinnlose und brutale Weise ihren Tod verloren hat.

@elonmusk — Elon Musk

Posted - January 12, 2025 at 12:54 AM

Saved - January 12, 2025 at 4:15 AM

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

Sag Nein zu Scholz! https://t.co/S7gkm3TLMf

@visegrad24 - Visegrád 24

The German SPD party today confirmed Olaf Scholz as their candidate for Chancellor. If they win, Scholz will remain the leader of Germany for another 4 years. In his acceptance speech, Scholz said he promises to raise wages and combat xenophobia https://t.co/c70FA3lvwP

@Alice_Weidel — Alice Weidel

Posted - January 24, 2025 at 1:27 PM

Saved - January 24, 2025 at 4:42 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

Die Brandmauer ist gefallen! CDU und CSU haben mein Angebot angenommen, im Bundestag gemeinsam mit der AfD zur Migration zu stimmen. Das ist eine gute Nachricht für unser Land! Wir haben geliefert, jetzt muss die Union ebenfalls liefern.

@Alice_Weidel - Alice Weidel

Die Brandmauer ist gefallen! CDU und CSU haben mein Angebot angenommen, in der Schicksalsfrage der Migration im Bundestag gemeinsam mit der AfD zu stimmen. Das ist eine gute Nachricht für unser Land! Wir haben geliefert, nun muss die Union auch liefern.

@Alice_Weidel - Alice Weidel

https://www.nius.de/politik/news/migrations-verschaerfung-cdu-beerdigt-die-zufallsmehrheiten-und-wuerde-afd-stimmen-akzeptieren/ee4fb53f-5cd4-4173-a6cd-2efba6a6eb10

Migrations-Verschärfung: CDU beerdigt die „Zufallsmehrheiten“ und würde AfD-Stimmen akzeptieren | NIUS.de Migrations-Verschärfung: CDU beerdigt die „Zufallsmehrheiten“ und würde AfD-Stimmen akzeptieren nius.de

@BenjaminLaepple — BenLppl

Posted - January 29, 2025 at 5:06 PM

Saved - January 29, 2025 at 6:31 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

Der Wahlkampf gegen Merz im progressiven Lager ist keine erfolgreiche Strategie. Die Polarisierung ist im links-grünen Lager höher als bei bürgerlichen Parteien. Themen wie Zuwanderung gewinnen an Bedeutung, und Merz zum Hauptfeind zu erklären, ist unklug. In der EU wird man keine Wahlen gewinnen, wenn man vor der politischen Rechten warnt. Die Rechte versteht menschliche Ängste besser, besonders in Krisenzeiten. Angst führt zu Wut, die mobilisiert, und es ist wichtig zu verstehen, warum Menschen, auch mit Migrationshintergrund, konservativer wählen.

@BenjaminLaepple - BenLppl

Der Anti-Merz ad hominem Wahlkampf von Teilen des progressiven Lagers ist keine winning strategy. Wer gesellschaftliche Spaltung beklagt & zugleich die Gleichsetzung von Merz & rechtsextremen Akteuren mit Superlativen betreibt, ist Teil des Problems. Eine Kurzanalyse 👇 1/

@BenjaminLaepple - BenLppl

Seit Monaten läuft auf Linkedin, Instagram, X, TikTok eine Schlammschlacht gegen Merz. Dabei übersieht ein großer Teil dieser Akteure, dass die affektive Polarisierung im links-grünen Lager deutlich höher ist, als im Lager der bürgerlichen Parteien. Siehe u.a. MIDEM (2023) 👇 2/ https://t.co/eeVst3z2IG

@BenjaminLaepple - BenLppl

Dies übersieht auch, wie sich global gerade die Themenschwerpunkte bei Wahlen so verschieben, dass Themen wahlentscheidend werden, bei denen die pol. Rechte einen natürlichen Vorteil hat. Like it or not, der 🐘 im Raum ist Zuwanderung. Merz zum Hauptfeind zu machen ist gaga. 3/ https://t.co/3xy17pA2Uv

@BenjaminLaepple - BenLppl

Man gewinnt in der EU keine Wahl mehr, wenn man vor der pol. Rechten warnt; der Zug ist längst abgefahren. PS: Wähler der politischen Rechten haben einen anderen Demokratiebegriff, sind jedoch nicht per se anti-demokratisch. Man kann sie aber in diese Richtung treiben. 4/

@BenjaminLaepple - BenLppl

Die Rechte hat intuitiv ein viel besseres Verständnis der irrationalen „menschlichen Natur“. Gerade in Krisenzeiten kommt es nämlich zu konservativen Impulsen in Gesellschaften; nach Huntington eine Art Verhaltensimmunsysten menschlicher Gemeinschaften zur Gefahrenabwehr. 5/

@BenjaminLaepple - BenLppl

In der Sozialpsychologie gibt es verschiedene Theorien, die dabei helfen, diese Reaktion nachzuvollziehen, u.a. Terror-Management-Theory oder diverse Autoritarismus-Konzepte (u.a. RWA, SDO). 6/ https://t.co/NvlyqDZjWN

@BenjaminLaepple - BenLppl

Anders ausgedrückt: Angst führt zu Wut und Wut mobilisiert. Angst vor dem Tod durch Kriminalität, nach einem Terrorangriff, schlägt Angst vor dem Klimawandel z.B. um ein Vielfaches. Demokratie und Klimawandel sind luxury beliefs, Sicherheit hingegen ist ein Grundbedürfnis. /end

@BenjaminLaepple - BenLppl

PS: Selbst wenn man eine Verschärfung der Migrationspolitik ablehnt - ein berechtigtes Anliegen - sollte man zumindest den Versuch wagen, zu verstehen, warum Menschen (inkl. Wählern mit Migrationshintergrund) „rechts“ wählen oder situativ konservativer werden 🤷‍♂️.

@SeibtNaomi — Naomi Seibt

Posted - January 29, 2025 at 6:39 PM

Saved - January 30, 2025 at 1:30 PM

@SeibtNaomi - Naomi Seibt

🚨🇩🇪 THE AFD JUST MADE HISTORY!!! The firewall has fallen. The German parliament has voted for a stricter migration policy. CDU leader Merz had to rely on the AfD to win the majority vote for this motion. Friedrich Merz, it is time to admit: Only the AfD can save Germany. https://t.co/S82pirrPCe

@Inevitablewest — Inevitable West

Posted - February 15, 2025 at 12:03 PM

Saved - February 16, 2025 at 12:44 AM

@Inevitablewest - Inevitable West

🚨BREAKING: German patriots march streets chanting ‘those who hate Germany must leave Germany!” The AfD must win next week. https://t.co/HkCnAkcKaM

@SeibtNaomi — Naomi Seibt

Posted - February 15, 2025 at 6:12 PM

Saved - February 16, 2025 at 12:14 AM

@SeibtNaomi - Naomi Seibt

🇩🇪 After the Islamic terror attack in Munich, the mother and her child who were fighting for their lives passed away. To our government and Merkel-Merz CDU, this is just another collateral damage for the “Refugees Welcome” agenda. We are sacrificial pawns in a battle for power. https://t.co/uQ58EiFUY3

@SeibtNaomi — Naomi Seibt

Posted - February 15, 2025 at 9:52 PM

Saved - February 15, 2025 at 10:50 PM

@SeibtNaomi - Naomi Seibt

🚨🇩🇪 ENOUGH! LET’S SAVE GERMANY‼️ Terror, murder, rape. Every single day. WHY are there still people who hope for change with the establishment parties? Because they are SCARED of the STIGMA attached to the AfD. Do you realize that this is a massive plot against YOU? https://t.co/tJQ4zUYGB6

Video Transcript AI Summary

Another child and mother were killed by an Afghan refugee. I've warned you this would happen again. Establishment parties reject the AfD's immigration control proposals because they need to gaslight you to extend their control, knowing you'll eventually vote AfD anyway. Why let them prolong the suffering? Be brave and vote AfD now because your family could be next. The AfD would dominate polls without the Nazi stigma created by the media and establishment parties like the CDU, who need it to cover their corruption and treason. Instead of preventing attacks, they avoid working with the AfD, a betrayal of the people. The media brainwashes you into thinking you're a Nazi if you vote AfD. JD Vance was criticized for his speech addressing the threat to German people's safety, a concept the establishment seems unfamiliar with. We must protect the German people whose existence is threatened by this asylum crisis. Only the AfD can save Germany. Overcome your Nazi stigma fears and make the right decision for your family and future generations.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Another child and his mother were killed by another Afghan refugee. Do you realize how insane that sentence is? I wish I could express my shock and say, what are the odds of this happening again within such a short span of time? But the truth is, this is just as expected. And in fact, I have been warning you that it was going to happen again very soon. Because as long as nothing changes, But but no real change? Do you want to know why the establishment party still reject the AFD's immigration control proposals in the parliament so vehemently because they have to gaslight you, because the AFD's inevitable long term. And so all they are doing right now is they are trying to extend their period, their term of government control, fully aware that in the future, you too are going to vote for the AfD. So why do you let them extend the suffering of the victims? Why do you let them gaslight you? Why can't you be brave and vote for the AFD now while we still have a chance? Because what you need to realize is that you could be next. Your family, your children, your sister, your mother, they could be next. Face the truth. The AFD would dominate in the polls if they were not burdened by the Nazi stigma. And who put the stigma there? The media and the establishment parties. The Merkel Merz CDU party needs the AFD to be vilified in order to cover up their own corruption. And the years of treason that they committed against you by ignoring your place and pushing this migration crisis on you. Instead of preventing the next terror attack and the next stabbing and the next rape. They discuss how to avoid having to pass laws together with the AfD. That is anti democratic. That is a mass betrayal of the people. The media and the public perception do everything in their power to brainwash you into thinking that you are a Nazi if you vote for the AfD. Vice president JD Vance was heavily criticized in Munich yesterday at the security conference where he gave a mind blowing speech that offended the entire establishment. Because according to the media and the establishment parties, he did not actually speak about Germany's security concerns. But, hell, yes, he did. He spoke about the threat to the German people's safety, but, apparently, the people's safety is a concept that the German establishment is not so familiar with. He was more concerned about Germany's people's free speech and not exactly the threat to the security of the establishment itself because I think they are doing quite well just by themselves. We don't need to protect these establishment overlords. We need to protect the German people whose very existence is under threat of being eliminated in this emergency asylum fraud crisis. The truth is only the AfD can save Germany. So please get over your Nazi stigma fears and make the right decision. Germany needs you. Your family needs you. Our children, the future generation, needs us.

@SeibtNaomi — Naomi Seibt

Posted - February 16, 2025 at 5:27 PM

Saved - February 17, 2025 at 2:08 PM

@SeibtNaomi - Naomi Seibt

🚨🇩🇪 ALICE WEIDEL SURPASSES 1 MILLION FOLLOWERS ON 𝕏 💙 @Alice_Weidel from the AfD is Germany’s most popular chancellor candidate on 𝕏. While her opponents are routinely getting ratio’ed with facts, Alice Weidel interacts with her followers and earns our support! https://t.co/RJAGQzQ1oP

@elonmusk — Elon Musk

Posted - February 17, 2025 at 2:55 PM

Saved - February 17, 2025 at 4:36 PM

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

The kids understand

@Inevitablewest - Inevitable West

German schools are holding mock elections. The AfD are winning every single one by a massive majority. The kids are going to be just fine. https://t.co/O5EyMAST1J

@charliekirk11 — Charlie Kirk

Posted - February 18, 2025 at 7:51 PM

Saved - February 19, 2025 at 1:02 PM

@charliekirk11 - Charlie Kirk

All Germans should vote AFD in the upcoming election. This is for the survival of Germany. Close your borders and protect your culture.

@WallStreetMav - Wall Street Mav

German women are making TikTok dances support of the AfD party, the only political party that supports mass deportations. The German media portrays AfD as a far right party, but most of their positions are normal. They merely also want deportations. https://t.co/IOg2xAyc8e

Video Transcript AI Summary

I voted for the AFD. It was a protest vote because I'm fed up with current politics and the established parties aren't getting it done. You see it in all the stabbings and rapes. I'm a woman, and I'm afraid to go out alone at night. I'm afraid to ride the train, afraid to go into the city, afraid to do anything in public. They talk about people being afraid of the AFD, but the AFD hasn't done anything to anyone, unlike some other people. The uncontrolled migration from the refugee crisis is going wrong. And I'm telling you, the AFD will get even more votes in the next election.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Ich hab die AFD gewählt. Tatsächlich war's bei mir eher Protest, weil mir die momentane Politik aufn Sack geht, die Altparteien das nicht hinbekommen haben, ne. Man merkt es an den ganzen Messerangriffen, an Vergewaltigung so. Ich bin selber eine Frau. Ich Ich ich hab Angst, wenn ich nachts alleine rausgehe. Speaker 1: Einfach nur, weil ich Angst Einfach nur, weil ich Angst habe Angst habe, Bahn zu fahren, Angst habe, in die Stadt zu gehen, Angst habe, irgendwas noch in der Öffentlichkeit zu machen. Und die reden davon, dass Leute Angst vor der AFD haben. Die AFD hat niemandem was getan im Gegensatz zu anderen Menschen. Und die der Flüchtlingskrise, das ist unkontrollierte Migration geht schief. Und ich sage euch, die AFD wird bei der nächsten Wahl noch mehr Prozente bekommen.

@elonmusk — Elon Musk

Posted - February 21, 2025 at 8:49 PM

Saved - February 21, 2025 at 11:50 PM

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

Only AfD can save Germany

@EvaVlaar - Eva Vlaardingerbroek

Yet another knife attack in Berlin this time. Multiple people are injured, one severely. As for now, the attacker is still on the loose. Europe is a totally unsafe place nowadays, but when @JDVance states that fact European leaders lose their minds. AfD all the way. https://t.co/1XMWNKeVHd

@elonmusk — Elon Musk

Posted - February 22, 2025 at 10:02 AM

Saved - February 22, 2025 at 2:00 PM

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

How many times must this happen?

@Inevitablewest - Inevitable West

🚨BREAKING: Berlin stabbing suspect revealed to be 19-year-old asylum seeker from Syria How many times? VOTE AFD. https://t.co/J08gTPQsyv

@SeibtNaomi — Naomi Seibt

Posted - February 22, 2025 at 8:17 PM

Saved - February 22, 2025 at 11:27 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

The terror ends with your vote! I fear for my loved ones every day, and I believe only the AfD can save Germany. I'm tired of the Nazi accusations; I care deeply about my country. It's time to bring back safety, freedom, and humor. I noticed Jan Böhmermann's piece in the NYT warning about the AfD and its associations, but it seems he overlooked how propaganda was a key tool for Hitler.

@SeibtNaomi - Naomi Seibt

🚨🇩🇪 THE TERR0R ENDS WITH YOUR VOTE! 🗳️ The longer you postpone the inevitable blue AfD wave, the more you extend the victims’ suffering. Not a day goes by that I do not fear for my friends’ and family’s lives. Only the AfD can save Germany. https://t.co/izyhKh4ZFa

Video Transcript AI Summary

I've been warning you this would happen again. As long as nothing changes, the outcome will remain the same. It's a cycle of terror, false promises, and fake apologies from puppet politicians, but no real change. The establishment rejects the AFD's immigration control proposals because they have to gaslight you. They're trying to extend their government control, knowing you'll eventually vote for the AFD. Why let them extend the suffering? Why let them gaslight you? Be brave and vote for the AFD now while we still have a chance. You need to realize that you could be next. Your family, your children, your sister, your mother—they could be next.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: This is just as expected, and in fact, I have been warning you that it was going to happen again very soon. Because as long as nothing changes, nothing changes. The outcome will be the same. This is the never ending cycle of terror and then false promises and fake apologies from our puppet politicians, but no real change. Do you want to know why the establishment party still reject the AFD's immigration control proposals in the parliament so vehemently? Because they have to gaslight you because the AFD's inevitable long term. And so all they are doing right now is they are trying to extend their period, their term of government control, fully aware that in the future you too are going to vote for the AFD. So why do you let them extend the suffering of the victims? Why do you let them gaslight you? Why can't you be brave and vote for the AFD now while we still have a chance? Because what you need to realize is that you could be next. Your family, your children, your sister, your mother, they could be next.

@SeibtNaomi - Naomi Seibt

I am DONE with the NAZl accusations, because I care about my home country Let’s bring back safety, freedom and memes! 💙🇩🇪

@SeibtNaomi - Naomi Seibt

🚨🇩🇪 NAOMI SEIBT vs JAN BÖHMERMANN for the NYT 🔥 Germany’s obnoxious TV clown Jan Böhmermann went to the @nytimes to warn the world about the NAZl AfD and “HitIer-saluter” @elonmusk Did he forget to mention that systemic propaganda was HitIer’s strongest power tool? https://t.co/iNEG1ZFZTZ

Video Transcript AI Summary

I'm addressing Jan Bilerman, criticizing his New York Times video portraying the AFD as a Nazi party supported by Elon Musk. I believe Jan is out of touch with the suffering of German citizens due to economic collapse and migrant crime, exacerbated by the current government. While Jan acknowledges the importance of remembering the Holocaust, he seems to have forgotten that restricting free speech was a key Nazi propaganda tool. His version of equality is socialist equity, where some are more equal than others, and his idea of liberty is dictating acceptable free speech. He fears the AFD because he fears the German people regaining authority over the government. Only the AFD can save Germany from his elitist vision. Remember, pride comes before the fall, and I'm ready to watch his empire crumble.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: And so we meet again Jan Bilerman. Speaker 1: Bouten tag from Germany, the country that needs saving according to Elon Musk. Speaker 0: You narcissistic little weasel sucking taxes out of German's pockets to support your sub mediocre comedy career on mainstream TV went to the New York Times to tell the world in a nine minute video that the AFD is a Nazi party supported by the Nazi King himself, Elon Musk. Apparently you thought you could be the left wing equivalent to me and tell the world about your or rather your establishment sponsors' judgment of German politics to the international audience. But the difference between you and me, Jan Buhlmann, is that you are on the losing side. Speaker 1: Our German extreme right party, the AFD, is projected to win almost every fifth vote in our national election this February. Should the rest of the world be worried about a big German fascist comeback? Yes. That's the space in which the AFD operates. They can say and do Nazi things as long as they aggressively deny that anyone was ever a Nazi. It's like giving the Hitler salute in front of a large crowd of right wing extremists while denying being a Nazi. How Speaker 0: much did they have to pay you to strip yourself of your dignity and express how much you hate your own heritage, your country that is giving you the privileges you enjoy today. I know you love the attention that's why you're enslaving yourself to the mainstream narrative because you still think that a spot in the mainstream media is worth this humiliation ritual that you are currently performing for the New York Times? Do you seriously think that you're providing any sort of positive contribution to the world by telling us, the German people, that we are just pieces of dog shit under your shoes? Germany's middle class citizens are suffering from the economic collapse and the skyrocketing migrant crime rates under the Olaf Scholz government, far left and eco Marxist. But you are so out of touch with reality in your privileged bubble that you couldn't care less about the very people whose taxes are supporting your pathetic existence. Speaker 1: Every day, twenty four seven, for now eighty years, we've been telling ourselves never again. Remembrance of the Holocaust is everywhere in Germany, a country stacked with memorials, memorials, memorials, memorials, just in case we forget to never forget. Unfortunately, never again didn't come with a manual on how to never again. Speaker 0: You actually made a good point when you said that never forget didn't come with a manual on how to never forget, but I think you forgot. And all the memorials and virtue signaling will not make up for the fact that people like you are promoting the destruction of our free speech and mandatory tax funded propaganda. It sounds a lot like what Josef Goebbels said about wanting to take over the entire broadcasting service to mandate the narrative that should be shoved on our throats. Apparently, you forgot that the restriction of free speech was the Nazis' strongest propaganda tool. You fit right in. Speaker 1: It's a narrative that seems to be successful all over the world. We aren't Nazis. We just don't fully support liberty, equality, and the rule of law. Speaker 0: When you say you want equality, what you mean is socialist equity. What you mean is some animals are more equal than others, one of those most equal animals being you. When you say you want liberty, what you mean is you want to be able to dictate what counts as liberty and acceptable free speech, but no one else can. When you say you're scared of the AFD's authoritarianism, what you mean is you are scared of the German people, the voters having authority over you and the government again and not the other way around. You are scared of democracy being independent from propaganda. And that's why only the AFD can save Germany from your aristocratic, elitist, narcissistic, egomaniacal version of Germany that benefits only you and the self proclaimed elitists and experts that you surround yourself with. Let's end on a German saying: Hochmut komt vor den Feil Pride comes before the fall and I love to watch your empire fall.

@SeibtNaomi — Naomi Seibt

Posted - February 23, 2025 at 7:55 PM

Saved - February 23, 2025 at 8:32 PM

@SeibtNaomi - Naomi Seibt

Why did East Germany predominantly vote for the AfD? 🇩🇪 Remember the Berlin Wall. Because they have experience with socialism. And they never ever want to suffer the horrors of Marxist tyranny again. https://t.co/yTb1nJNL2e

@MarioNawfal — Mario Nawfal

Posted - February 26, 2025 at 11:05 AM

Saved - February 28, 2025 at 12:07 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

Germany has resumed Afghan refugee flights, bringing 155 individuals to Berlin after a temporary halt during the election period. The CDU and SPD, having navigated a rise in AfD support, approved the move, with 3,000 more refugees waiting in Islamabad. Since 2021, Germany has accepted 48,000 Afghan refugees, costing taxpayers significantly. The pause followed violent incidents involving Afghan nationals, prompting criticism of the government's motives. Despite past concerns about security, CDU's Friedrich Merz now emphasizes the importance of open borders.

@MarioNawfal - Mario Nawfal

🚨🇩🇪GERMANY RESTARTS AFGHAN REFUGEE FLIGHTS IN POST ELECTION U-TURN Germany’s back in the Afghan refugee game, landing 155 in Berlin yesterday after a sly election-time pause. The CDU and SPD, fresh off dodging an AfD surge, greenlit the move, with 3,000 more queued up in Islamabad - part of 48,000 taken since 2021, costing taxpayers hundreds of millions. The halt came after brutal attacks by Afghan nationals - like the rampage in Munich, killing 2 and injuring 28, or the Aschaffenburg daycare stabbings that killed a toddler. The Interior Ministry blamed 'logistics,' but critics smell political optics. Ex-Interior Minister Horst Seehofer once admitted some evacuees were rapists and on terror watchlists. Yet, CDU’s Friedrich Merz, once hawkish, now shrugs, 'No one wants closed borders.' Source: ZeroHedge

@MarioNawfal - Mario Nawfal

🚨🇩🇪 SPD TO CDU: DROP AfD ALLIANCE OR FORGET A COALITION Germany’s Social Democrats (SPD) have a clear message for the Christian Democrats (CDU): No coalition unless CDU leader Friedrich Merz changes his approach and distances himself from AfD-backed policies. SPD co-leader Lars Klingbeil: "Our expectations are clear, we would like to see from Merz to clearly change his course and also his tone and, and demonstrate how we can work together in these difficult times. The ball is now in Friedrich Merz's court, he has the task of forming a government, he is going to meet with us, he will also make offers as to what the future of our country would look like and we have clear expectations as Social Democrats." CDU/CSU won 28.5% of the vote, while SPD got 16.4%. Together, they could form a government—but only if they agree on key issues like pensions, investments, and economic growth. Merz wants a deal before Easter (April 20-21), but SPD isn’t budging. Source: ZDF

@MarioNawfal - Mario Nawfal

🇩🇪 MERZ SCRAMBLES TO FUND GERMANY’S MILITARY BEFORE NEW PARLIAMENT SLAMS THE BRAKES Germany’s chancellor-in-waiting, Friedrich Merz, is racing to lock in more defense spending before liberal and conservative lawmakers—who now hold a blocking minority—can shut it down after March… https://t.co/6ol9LClwPf

@MarioNawfal — Mario Nawfal

Posted - February 26, 2025 at 11:05 AM

Saved - February 28, 2025 at 12:07 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

Germany has resumed Afghan refugee flights, bringing 155 individuals to Berlin after a temporary halt during elections. The CDU and SPD approved the move, with 3,000 more refugees awaiting in Islamabad, part of a total of 48,000 since 2021, costing taxpayers significantly. The pause followed violent incidents involving Afghan nationals, raising concerns about security. Critics suggest the halt was politically motivated. Despite past admissions of some evacuees being problematic, CDU’s Friedrich Merz stated that closed borders are not desired.

@MarioNawfal - Mario Nawfal

@ILA_NewsX - I Love America News

@MarioNawfal Germany has fallen. https://t.co/EOIEuTeVjD

@elonmusk — Elon Musk

Posted - May 2, 2025 at 4:49 PM

Saved - May 3, 2025 at 9:25 AM

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

Banning the centrist AfD, Germany’s, most popular party, would be an extreme attack on democracy

@shellenberger - Michael Shellenberger

Since WWII, Germany's liberal democracy has held. Now, it's on the brink. The government censors, spies on, and persecutes critics. And, today, it laid the groundwork to ban the nation's most popular political party, the AfD. My exclusive interview with one of its leaders. https://t.co/K6zxu4j2YQ

@VigilantFox — The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Posted - May 9, 2025 at 8:49 PM

Saved - May 10, 2025 at 1:32 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

Today’s White House press briefing was a showdown, with Karoline Leavitt taking on media narratives aimed at undermining Trump. She swiftly countered claims about Trump’s Middle East trip and trade deal with the UK, asserting his commitment to public service and the legitimacy of the agreements. When challenged on the Consumer Product Safety Commission and the firing of the Librarian of Congress, she defended the administration's actions with clarity. Leavitt's responses showcased a decisive shift in handling media scrutiny.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

This was a SMACKDOWN. The media came to the White House press briefing today armed with networks talking points. They came to spin, smear, and sabotage Trump’s latest moves. But Karoline Leavitt was ready—locked, loaded, and armed with the truth. She didn’t just clap back… She torched their entire narrative on live TV. 🧵THREAD

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

👆And don’t forget to bookmark this thread—because what you’re about to see is a masterclass in media narratives crumbling in real time. These moments won’t make it to the mainstream. Let’s break it down.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

The media onslaught began the moment Karoline Leavitt opened the floor at the White House press briefing. One reporter wasted no time, suggesting Trump’s upcoming trip to the Middle East was less about diplomacy and more about personal business. He hasn’t even landed in Saudi Arabia, the U.A.E., or Qatar—but they were already implying he was using the presidency for private gain. “Is the president planning to meet with folks involved with any of the family businesses over there?” the reporter asked. Leavitt cut the question off before it could gain steam. “Not to my knowledge,” she said. Then she fired back at the entire narrative. “I think it’s frankly ridiculous that anyone in this room would even suggest that President Trump is doing anything for his own benefit.” She reminded the room what Trump gave up to serve the country—twice. “He left a life of luxury and a life of running a very successful real estate empire for public service. Not just once, but twice.” And she made it clear why the American people sent him back to the White House. “The American public reelected him back to this White House because they trust he acts in the best interests of our country and putting the American public first.” Leavitt then highlighted what the media never admits: “This is a president who has actually lost money for being president of the United States.” She ended with a pointed comparison. “I don’t remember these types of questions being asked of my predecessor about a career politician who was clearly profiting off of this office.”

Video Transcript AI Summary

The speaker stated that they think it's ridiculous to suggest President Trump is acting for his own benefit. They claim he left a life of luxury and a successful real estate empire for public service, not just once, but twice, and the American public reelected him because they trust he acts in the country's best interest. The speaker asserted that Trump has lost money being president. They don't recall similar questions being asked of the previous president, a career politician who was allegedly profiting off the office. The speaker maintains that President Trump does not do this, and the White House holds itself to the highest ethical standards.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Given that you you noted he is a successful businessman, do you know if the president has any plans to to meet with any of the folks involved with any of the the family businesses over there or see any of the sites that are gonna be Not not Speaker 1: to my knowledge, and let me just get to premise of your question that both of you have raised. I think it's frankly ridiculous that anyone in this room would even suggest that president Trump is doing anything for his own benefit. He left a life of luxury and a life of running a very successful real estate empire for public service, not just once, but twice. And again, the American public reelected him back to this White House because they trust he acts in the best interest of our country and putting the American public first. This is a president who has actually lost money for being president of The United States. I don't remember these same type of questions being asked of my predecessor about a career politician who was clearly profiting off of this office. That is not what president Trump does, and this White House holds ourselves to the highest of ethical standards.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Next came the spin on Trump’s trade deal with the UK. Fox News correspondent Jacqui Heinrich tried to downplay the deal’s legitimacy—suggesting it wasn’t real or ready. “Why did the White House announce this deal with the U.K. before all of the details were finished?” Leavitt and Heinrich already have a history of sparring. Leavitt cut through it instantly. “That’s not true. Actually, I saw the fact sheet.” And she wasn’t just reading summaries. “I saw the deal as well, before the president brought all of you in the Oval Office in the effort of transparency. You had the president and the Prime Minister on the phone talking to all of you directly about how this was a great deal, a phenomenal deal.” Then she broke it down, step by step. “You set an initial agreement, you set the framework, you set up the deal, and then, of course, you know, T’s have to be crossed and I’s have to be dotted—but this deal is a good deal.” Heinrich tried again—this time about tariffs. Leavitt stood firm. “The president is committed to the 10% baseline tariff, not just for the United Kingdom, but for his trade negotiations with all other countries as well, permanently, even after the deals are done. Like, that is going to remain.” Every attempt to twist the facts was met with clarity—and strength.

Video Transcript AI Summary

The White House announced the deal with the UK because the deal was complete, contrary to claims. The president and prime minister spoke about the phenomenal deal, and discussions will continue. Trade deals involve an initial agreement, framework, and deal, followed by finalizing details. The numbers are determined, and market access will remain. The president is committed to a 10% baseline tariff, not just for the UK, but for all trade negotiations with other countries. The president is determined to continue with the 10% baseline tariff permanently, even after the deals are done.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Why did the White House announce this deal with The UK before all of the details were finished? Speaker 1: That's not true, actually. I, saw the fact sheet. I saw the deal as well, before the president brought all of you in the Oval Office in the effort of transparency. You have the president and the prime minister on the phone talking to all of you directly about how this was a great deal, a phenomenal deal, and discussions will continue. But as I spoke to our ambassador Greer yesterday, this is how trade deals work. You set an initial agreement, you set the framework, you set up the deal, and then of course, you know, dot, t's have to be crossed and i's have to be dotted. But this deal is a good deal, and the numbers are determined and all of the market access that I just discussed will remain. Speaker 0: Does that mean that the 10% baseline is going to still be there at the end when all of the other details are ironed out? Speaker 1: The president is committed to Speaker 0: the 10% baseline tariff not just for Speaker 1: The United Kingdom, but for his trade negotiations with all other countries Speaker 0: as Speaker 1: well. Speaker 0: Permanently, even after the deals are done. Like, that is going to remain? The president is determined to continue with that 10% baseline tariff. I just spoke to him about it earlier.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

She was not expecting that... https://t.co/YewbscEuwB

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Before we roll the next clip: if you’re not following me, you’re missing out on critical updates. Hit the bell 🔔 to stay sharp and informed. → @VigilantFox Now, back to the story you came for. https://t.co/B1SaF1YgXw

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Then the gloves really came off. A reporter tried to corner Leavitt over the administration’s plan to dismantle the Consumer Product Safety Commission. She even tried to make it personal. “This is the federal agency, independent one, that does recalls and is responsible for product safety.” “Does the administration not believe that it’s important, you know, to keep toys and cribs, I mean, you’re a young mom…” Leavitt didn’t waste a second. “Within which branch? It’s the executive branch. Who’s the head of the executive branch?” And with that, she delivered the knockout. “The president of the United States. He has the right to fire people within the executive branch. It’s a pretty simple answer.” She was cooked and she knew it.

Video Transcript AI Summary

The administration is allegedly dismantling the Consumer Product Safety Commission, an independent federal agency responsible for product recalls and safety. The question is raised whether the administration believes it's important to ensure the safety of products like toys and cribs. The response asserts that the agency is within the executive branch, and the President has the right to fire people within the executive branch.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Sure. Caroline, yesterday, the administration appears to have started dismantling the Consumer Product Safety Commission. This is the federal agency, an independent one that does recalls and is responsible for product safety. Does the administration not believe that it's important, you know, to keep toys and cribs? I mean, you're a young mom off of the product of of the market. Speaker 1: It's a federal agency within which branch? It's the executive branch. Who's the head of the executive branch? The president of The United States. He has the right to fire people within the executive branch. It's a pretty simple answer.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

The last shot came over Trump’s firing of Librarian of Congress Carla Hayden. “The president fired the Librarian of Congress. Why did he choose to do that?” Leavitt didn’t flinch. “We felt she did not fit the needs of the American people. There were quite concerning things that she had done at the Library of Congress in the pursuit of DEI and, putting inappropriate books in the library for children.” There is a new administration in charge, and this time there are principles. “And we don’t believe that she was serving the interests of the American taxpayer well, so she has been removed from her position, and the president is well within his rights to do that.” Four battles. Four clean takedowns. And the message was clear: the days of media gotcha games are over.

Video Transcript AI Summary

The president fired the Librarian of Congress because she did not fit the needs of the American people. She had pursued DEI initiatives and put inappropriate books for children in the library. The president felt she was not serving the interests of the American taxpayer. He is within his rights to remove her from her position.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: The president fired the Librarian of Congress. Why did he choose to do that? We felt she did not fit the needs of the American people. There were quite concerning things that she had done at the Library of Congress in the pursuit of DEI and putting inappropriate books in the library for children. And we don't believe that she was serving the interests of the American taxpayer well, so she has been removed from her position and the president is well within his rights to do that.

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Thanks for reading. Follow me for more stories that matter. —> @VigilantFox Looking for something else to read? Germany is on the brink of national suicide—and VDH just revealed the one party trying to save the nation from this nightmare. https://t.co/HEi1YQEGEz

@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊

Germany is on the brink of national suicide—and it’s no accident. What was once Europe’s economic powerhouse is now unraveling under green delusions, open borders, and paralyzing deindustrialization. Victor Davis Hanson reveals the one party trying to save the nation from this nightmare. But the elites just labeled them “extremists” for telling the truth. 🧵THREAD

@PeterBorbe — Peter Borbe

Posted - August 30, 2025 at 5:31 AM

Saved - September 3, 2025 at 3:40 AM

@PeterBorbe - Peter Borbe

4 tote AfD-Kandidaten innerhalb von 2 Wochen bei den NRW-Kommunalwahlen: Wolfgang Seitz (Rheinberg), Ralph Lange (Blomberg), Stefan Berendes (Bad Lippspringe), Wolfgang Klinger /Schwerte), alle 4 starben plötzlich und unerwartet. Eine erstaunliche Häufung von Todesfällen, oder? https://t.co/RoqbLf8tJ3

@MarioNawfal — Mario Nawfal

Posted - November 12, 2025 at 2:00 PM

Saved - November 12, 2025 at 11:39 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

I report that several German banks are freezing AfD-linked accounts, claiming “banking secrecy.” AfD calls it political debanking—a financial weapon to punish opposition to immigration and traditional values. The moves span cities, affecting party donations and officials’ personal banking. Germany’s intelligence labeled AfD “far-right” for opposing gender ideology and open borders, effectively criminalizing dissent. When democracy means freezing opponents’ bank accounts, its meaning is questioned.

@MarioNawfal - Mario Nawfal

🇩🇪 GERMAN BANKS FREEZE AfD ACCOUNTS IN ESCALATING CRACKDOWN ON DISSENT Multiple German banks are shutting down accounts linked to AfD, now the country’s largest opposition party, without explanation, citing “banking secrecy.” AfD leaders call it political debanking, a financial weapon to punish opposition to illegal immigration and defense of traditional values. This isn’t isolated: from Berlin to Düsseldorf, accounts are vanishing, including party donations and personal banking for elected officials. Behind it all, Germany’s intelligence service labeled AfD “far-right” for challenging gender ideology and open-border policies, effectively criminalizing dissent. When “democracy” means freezing your opponents' bank accounts, maybe it’s not democracy anymore. Source: Euronews

@MarioNawfal - Mario Nawfal

🇩🇪 AfD MEP DEFIES CRITICS - HE’S GOING TO SOCHI FOR BRICS CONGRESS German MEP Hans Neuhoff from the Alternative for Germany (AfD) party just dropped a geopolitical bomb: He’s attending the upcoming BRICS congress in Sochi, despite fierce criticism from Berlin’s ruling bloc. Neuhoff: “Politicians from the CDU/CSU bloc who think we should ignore BRICS understand nothing about geopolitics. They are leading Germany and Europe into a dead end, not a prosperous future.” There's a growing rift in Germany over how to approach the BRICS+ alliance - now seen by some as a counterweight to Western dominance and by others as a threat to transatlantic unity. By showing up in Sochi, Neuhoff is signaling that parts of Europe’s conservatives are ready to pivot eastward, betting on multipolar cooperation over loyalty to Washington and Brussels. This could widen the fault line inside the EU: pro-Western orthodoxy vs. nationalist pragmatism - and the BRICS stage in Russia might just be where that divide becomes impossible to ignore. Source: Handelsblatt

@MarioNawfal - Mario Nawfal

🇩🇪 INTERVIEW: "ELON HAS GIVEN CONSERVATIVES IN EUROPE A VOICE" @SeibtNaomi: "I'm very grateful for the exposure @elonmusk has given me and the AfD, but also just the encouragement to fight. That's what he does. He gets so many death threats; he gets so many threats from all https://t.co/YYzrFYWY5F

Video Transcript AI Summary

Neymar: Yeah. Fortunately, it was very much because of Elon’s response to what was going on in Europe too that I realized that it was extremely dangerous when I did announce it to him before I even applied, just to see his reaction, whether he would agree, because sometimes I like to gas up myself and think, maybe it’s not that crazy. And he, yeah, basically gave me his approval instantly, thinking that it’s a good idea. I’m very, very grateful, not only for the exposure that he has given me and the AFD and my country as a whole, Patriots in my country, but also just for the yeah. Kind of, like, the encouragement to fight because that’s what he does. No matter what, like, he he gets so many death threats. He gets so many threats from all sides, but he still continues, and that has inspired me a lot. And then it was only after my application that Ana Polina Luna reached out to me. So, like I said, I didn’t ask anyone for a favor. I want to do this the legitimate way, and now exciting things are coming for sure. I I definitely want to take this further. This is only step one because I’m applying for asylum, not because I want to be in The United States so desperately. I mean, I love The United States. So, yeah, don’t get me wrong. 100%. But I could just apply for, I don’t know, journalism visa, for example, and I could stay here that way. I’m doing this to seek protection from the US government because I genuinely fear for my life over there in Germany. I fear that if I come back, I will be arrested. Fun fact, I just actually saw my sister sent me a letter that I got from the police that I’m now officially being charged with a hate crime, is it it’s what it’s called, for one of my tweets. I don’t know which one are currently requesting that from the police, so, yeah, we’ll see. Speaker 0: Funny funny thing you’re over. Anyone that’s saying that you’re maybe overreacting by doing all this, you’ve just received a letter from the police charging you with hate crime. Speaker 1: Yeah. That’s just a small detail of my entire history. I have the evidence from the German intelligence community. It was also funny. I was interviewed by The Telegraph, and they apparently reached out to German intelligence to get a comment, and they refused to comment.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Neymar, what's the response like from I know Elon has been engaging with you. Congresswoman Luna has been supportive as well. Have you spoken to anyone else? Have you spoken to anyone from the Trump administration? How's the reception like in The US? Speaker 1: Yeah. Fortunately, it was very much because of Elon's response to what was going on in Europe too that I realized that it was extremely dangerous when I did announce it to him before I even applied, just to see his reaction, whether he would agree, because sometimes I like to gas up myself and think, maybe it's not that crazy. And he, yeah, basically gave me his approval instantly, thinking that it's a good idea. I'm very, very grateful, not only for the exposure that he has given me and the AFD and my country as a whole, Patriots in my country, but also just for the yeah. Kind of, like, the encouragement to fight because that's what he does. No matter what, like, he he gets so many death threats. He gets so many threats from all sides, but he still continues, and that has inspired me a lot. And then it was only after my application that Ana Polina Luna reached out to me. So, like I said, I didn't ask anyone for a favor. I want to do this the legitimate way, and now exciting things are coming for sure. I I definitely want to take this further. This is only step one because I'm applying for asylum, not because I want to be in The United States so desperately. I mean, I love The United States. So, yeah, don't get me wrong. 100%. But I could just apply for, I don't know, journalism visa, for example, and I could stay here that way. I'm doing this to seek protection from the US government because I genuinely fear for my life over there in Germany. I fear that if I come back, I will be arrested. Fun fact, I just actually saw my sister sent me a letter that I got from the police that I'm now officially being charged with a hate crime, is it it's what it's called, for one of my tweets. I don't know which one are currently requesting that from the police, so, yeah, we'll see. Speaker 0: Funny funny thing you're over. Anyone that's saying that you're maybe overreacting by doing all this, you've just received a letter from the police charging you with hate crime. Speaker 1: Yeah. That's just a small detail of my entire history. I have the evidence from the German intelligence community. It was also funny. I was interviewed by The Telegraph, and they apparently reached out to German intelligence to get a comment, and they refused to comment.