reSee.it - Related Post Feed

kanyewest
Posted - March 19, 2025 at 9:51 PM
Saved - March 20, 2025 at 1:11 AM

@kanyewest - ye

It’s time to go get my children from the situation everyone knows their in They killed that boy from Lincoln Park for this but I’m not letting my children be in this anymore I will be dead before my kids be in Sierra Canyon in September https://t.co/wpRDQ1Pwza

EricLDaugh
Posted - September 12, 2025 at 2:11 PM
Saved - September 12, 2025 at 4:37 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I learned that Tyler Robinson, the suspect in the Charlie Kirk assassination case, had plans to retrieve a rifle from a drop point with his roommate. There were messages on Discord discussing the rifle's location and engraved bullets. He was booked into jail this morning.

@EricLDaugh - Eric Daugherty

🚨 BREAKING: Charlie Kirk assassin suspect Tyler Robinson made plans for retrieval of a rifle from a "DROP POINT" with roommate. Engraved bullets. Messages exchanged via Discord. Booked into jail this morning. Get this monster in the CHAIR, ASAP! "Leaving a rifle in a bush, messages related to visually watching the area where a rifle was left, a message referring to having left the rifle wrapped in a towel. The messages refer to engraving bullets."

Video Transcript AI Summary
Robinson mentioned Charlie Kirk was coming to UVU; a family member said Kirk was full of hate and spreading hate and disliked his viewpoints. The family member confirmed a gray Dodge Challenger. Investigators identified Robinson's roommate; he said Robinson had made a joke on Discord and showed messages, allowing investigators to photograph the screen. The messages, between a contact named Tyler (with an emoji) and Robinson's roommate, described retrieving a rifle from a drop point, leaving the rifle in a bush, visually watching the area, and leaving the rifle wrapped in a towel. They referenced engraving bullets and a scope. Area north of Campus Drive Road near UVU. Investigators found a bolt-action rifle wrapped in a dark towel: Mauser Model 98.3 -six caliber bolt action with a scope. Fired casing inscription: 'Notices, Bulges, capital o w o, what's this question mark?' Unfired casings read 'Hey, Fascist!' and 'Catch!'.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Member, Robinson mentioned Charlie Kirk was coming to UVU. They talked about why they didn't like him and the viewpoints that he had. The family member also stated Kirk was full of hate and spreading hate. The family member confirmed a gray Dodge Challenger. Investigators identified an individual as the roommate of Robinson. Investigators interviewed that roommate who stated that his roommate made a joke on Discord. Investigators asked if he would show them the messages on Discord. He opened it and showed several messages to investigators and allowed investigators to take photos of the screen as each message was shown by Robinson's roommate. These photos consisted of various messages including content of messages between the phone contact name Tyler with an emoji icon and Robinson's roommate's device. Content of these messages included messages affiliated with the contact Tyler stating a need to retrieve a rifle from a drop point, leaving the rifle in a bush, messages related to visually watching the area where a rifle was left, and a message referring to having left the rifle wrapped in a towel. The messages also refer to engraving bullets and a mention of a scope and the rifle being unique. Messages from the contact Tyler also mentioned that he had changed outfits. I know there has been speculation as well as to the writing on those casings, those those those bullet casings, and I believe we have that as well. And I I will share that with you now. So the area north of Campus Drive Road where the suspect crossed over, you saw some of that in the video that we released last night, consists of a grassy area with trees on the edge of the UVU campus. Investigators discovered a bolt action rifle wrapped in a dark colored towel. The rifle was determined to be a Mauser Model 98.3 -six caliber bolt action rifle. The rifle had a scope mounted on top of it. Investigators noted inscriptions that had been engraved on casings found with the rifle. Inscriptions on a fired casing read, Notices, Bulges, capital o w o, what's this question mark? Inscriptions on the three unfired casings read, Hey, Fascist exclamation point, Catch exclamation point.
Nostradamnit
Posted - September 14, 2025 at 2:56 AM
Saved - September 16, 2025 at 9:36 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The roommate's claim that he thought the messages were a joke is absurd. The shooter was clearly debriefing his partner with serious details like retrieving a rifle, engraving bullets, and changing outfits to evade capture. This wasn't a joke; it was an update.

@Nostradamnit - Nostradamnit

The roommate’s claim that he thought these messages were a "joke" is absurd once you read the details. The shooter wasn't joking, he was debriefing his partner: ▪️ Retrieving a rifle from a drop point ▪️ "Engraving bullets" ▪️ Changing outfits to evade capture Does this look like a joke to you? This wasn't a confession; it was an update. He knew. #TrueCrime

propandco
Posted - September 14, 2025 at 8:20 PM
Saved - September 15, 2025 at 5:55 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
There is significant disinformation surrounding Tyler Robinson and the shooting of Charlie Kirk. Claims about Tyler confessing, being trans, or sending messages on Discord have not been confirmed. Discord has denied any involvement, and Tyler is not cooperating with authorities. The narrative about a "family friend" turning him in has shifted to imply uncertainty. Additionally, reports suggest his roommate, not his father, was involved in turning him in, but this too is questionable. Tyler's grandmother believes the FBI has the wrong person.

@propandco - Propaganda & co

Tyler Robinson has NOT confessed to the shooting Charlie Kirk https://t.co/YjeS2rJZN3

Video Transcript AI Summary
Thing new on the investigation. You say he admitted that. Confessed? No. Not not again, he's he's not confessed to, to authorities. He he is he is, he's not cooperating. But, but but all the people around him are cooperating, and I I think that's, that's that's very important. Thing new on the investigation. You say he admitted that. Confessed? No. Not not again, he's he's not confessed to, to authorities. He he is he is, he's not cooperating. But, but but all the people around him are cooperating, and I I think that's, that's that's very important. Thing new on the investigation. You say he admitted that. Confessed? No. Not not again, he's he's not confessed to, to authorities. He he is he is, he's not cooperating. But, but but all the people around him are cooperating, and I I think that's, that's that's very important.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Thing new on the investigation. You say he admitted that. Confessed? No. Not not again, he's he's not confessed to, to authorities. He he is he is, he's not cooperating. But, but but all the people around him are cooperating, and I I think that's, that's that's very important.

@propandco - Propaganda & co

There is a lot of disinformation about the alleged shooter People claimed he confessed That he was trans or had a trans partner That he sent messages on discord planning the attack As of now, these things are not confirmed Discord rejected the idea that messages about the shooting were sent by Tyler via their platform The suspect isn’t cooperating, suggesting that he has not confessed to anything The media is now softening their claim that the “family friend” who helped “turn him in” was sure of his confession “Confessed to them” has now become “implied to them.” Is this incompetence by the FBI and governor of Utah in the way they present the information to the media or are these the signs of a cover up ?

@propandco - Propaganda & co

It is also no longer clear that his “father” turned him in. According to the daily mail, Tyler’s roommate turned him in. This should also not be treated as accurate. There is too much disinformation. https://t.co/cs29TxV66S

@propandco - Propaganda & co

Tyler’s grandmother claims the FBI have the wrong man https://t.co/sH9NKPnLRI

bennyjohnson
Posted - September 16, 2025 at 7:01 PM
Saved - September 17, 2025 at 6:19 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared a chilling text exchange between Robinson and his roommate after a murder. Robinson instructed his roommate to look under his keyboard and revealed he was involved in the crime, expressing regret for involving him. He detailed his plan to retrieve a rifle he had hidden, fearing it could be traced back to him. Robinson mentioned feeling compelled to act against the victim's hatred and discussed the potential consequences of losing the rifle. He urged his roommate to stay silent if questioned by police and expressed concern for their well-being.

@bennyjohnson - Benny Johnson

BREAKING: Utah County DA reads the full text message exchange between Charlie Kirk’s assassin and his transgender boyfriend/roommate after committing the murder: ROBINSON: "Drop what you're doing, look under my keyboard." ROOMMATE: "You are joking right?" ROBINSON: "I am still okay, my love. Shouldn't be long until I can come home, but I gotta grab my rifle still. To be honest, I had hoped to keep this secret till I died of old age. I am sorry to involve you." ROOMMATE: "You weren't the one who did it, right?" ROBINSON: "I am, I am, I'm sorry." ROOMMATE: "I thought they caught the person." ROBINSON: "No, they grabbed some crazy old dude, then interrogated someone in similar clothing. I had planned to grab my rifle from my drop point shortly after, but most of that side of town got locked down. It's quiet, almost enough to get out, but there's one vehicle lingering." ROOMMATE: "Why?" ROBINSON: "Why did I do it? I had enough of his hatred. Some hate can't be negotiated out. If I am able to grab my rifle unseen, I will have left no evidence. Going to attempt to retrieve it again. Hopefully they have moved on. I haven't seen anything about them finding it." ROOMMATE: "How long have you been planning this?" ROBINSON: "A bit over a week, I believe. I can get close to it, but there is a squad car parked right by it. I think they already swept that spot, but I don't want to chance it. I'm wishing I had circled back and grabbed it as soon as I got to my vehicle. I'm worried what my old man would do if I didn't bring back Grandpa's rifle. IDEK if it had a serial number, but it wouldn't trace to me. I worry about prints. I had to leave it in a bush where I changed outfits. I might have to abandon it and hope they don't find prints." "How the F will I explain losing it to my old man? Only thing I left was the rifle wrapped in a towel. Remember how he was engraving bullets? The F in messages are mostly a big meme. If I see notice bulge U-W-U on Fox News, I might have a stroke, all right, I'm gonna have to leave it. That really F in sucks. Judging from today, I'd say grandpa's gun does just fine IDK. I think that was a 2K dollar scope." "Delete this exchange. My dad wants photos of the rifle. He says, Grandpa wants to know who has what. The feds released a photo of the rifle and it is very unique. He's calling me, RN. Not answering. Since Trump got into office, my dad has been pretty diehard MAGA. I'm gonna turn myself in willingly. One of my neighbors here is a deputy for the sheriff. Again, you are all I worry about love. Don't take any interviews or make any comments. If any police ask you questions, ask for a lawyer and stay silent."

Video Transcript AI Summary
"drop what you're doing. Look under my keyboard." "I had the opportunity to take out Charlie Kirk, and I'm going to take it." "You're joking." "I had planned to grab my rifle from my drop point shortly after, but most of that side of town got locked down." "If I am able to grab my rifle unseen, I will have left no evidence." "I might have to abandon it and hope they don't find prints." "Remember how I was engraving bullets?" "The feds released a photo of the rifle, and it is very unique." "I'm gonna turn myself in willingly." "Robinson, don't talk to the media, please. Don't take any interviews or make any comments. If any police ask you questions, ask for a lawyer and stay silent."
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The roommate. Police interviewed Robinson's roommate, a biological male who was was involved in a romantic relationship with Robinson. The roommate told police that the roommate received messages from Robinson about the shooting, and and he did provide those messages to police. On 09/10/2025, the roommate received a text message from Robinson which said, drop what you're doing. Look under my keyboard. The roommate looked under the keyboard and found a note that stated, quote, I had the opportunity to take out Charlie Kirk, and I'm going to take it. Police found a photograph of this note. The following exchange text exchange then took place. After reading the note, the roommate responded, what? You're joking. Right? Robinson, I am still okay, my love, but I'm stuck in Orem for a little while longer yet. Shouldn't be long until I can come home, but I gotta grab my rifle still. To be honest, I had hoped to keep this secret till I died of old age. I am sorry to involve you. Roommate, you weren't the one who did it. Right? Robinson, I am. I am. I'm sorry. Roommate, I thought they caught the person. Robinson, no. They grabbed some crazy old dude, then interrogated someone in similar clothing. I had planned to grab my rifle from my drop point shortly after, but most of that side of town got locked down. It's quiet, almost enough to get out, but there's one vehicle lingering. Roommate. Why? Robinson. Why did I do it? Roommate. Yeah. Robinson. I had enough of his hatred. Some hate can't be negotiated out. If I am able to grab my rifle unseen, I will have left no evidence. Going to attempt to retrieve it again. Hopefully, they have moved on. I haven't seen anything about them finding it. Roommate, how long have you been planning this? Robinson, a bit over a week, I believe. I can get close to it, but there is a squad car parked right by it. I think they already swept that spot, but I don't wanna chance it. Robinson again. I'm wishing I had circled back and grabbed it as soon as I got to my vehicle. I'm worried what my old man would do if I didn't bring back grandpa's rifle. I d e k if it's had a serial number, but it wouldn't trace to me. I worry about prints. I had to leave it in a bush where I changed outfits. Didn't have the ability or time to bring it with. I might have to abandon it and hope they don't find prints. How the f will I explain losing it to my old man? Only thing I left was the rapple was the rifle wrapped in a towel. Remember how I was engraving bullets? The f in messages are mostly a big meme. If I see notice bulge u w u on Fox New, I might have a stroke alright. I'm gonna have to leave it. That really effing sucks. Judging from today, I'd say grandpa's gun does just fine IDK. I think that was a 2 a a 2 k dollar scope. Wink. Wink. Robinson. Robinson again. Delete this exchange. Again, Robinson. My dad wants photos of the rifle. He says grandpa wants to know who has what. The feds released a photo of the rifle, and it is very unique. He's calling me, RN, not answering. Robinson, since Trump got into office, my dad has been pretty diehard MAGA. Robinson, I'm gonna turn myself in willingly. One of my neighbors here is a deputy for the sheriff. Again, you are all I worry about love. That came from Robinson. Roommate, I'm much more worried about you. Robinson, don't talk to the media, please. Don't take any interviews or make any comments. If any police ask you questions, ask for a lawyer and stay silent. The search for Robin
MJTruthUltra
Posted - September 16, 2025 at 7:17 PM
Saved - September 17, 2025 at 5:01 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I came across some concerning text messages from Tyler Robinson discussing plans to harm Charlie Kirk. Robinson expresses regret about involving his boyfriend and reveals he had been planning this for over a week. He talks about retrieving a rifle and worries about leaving evidence. Despite the gravity of the situation, he refers to the messages as mostly a joke. He also mentions his father's strong political views and his intention to turn himself in, urging his boyfriend to stay silent if questioned by the media or police.

@MJTruthUltra - MJTruthUltra

UPDATE: Charlie Kirk Utah District Attorney discusses Tyler Robinson Text Messages.. and I’m sorry, it sounds like a bunch of baloney 🔻 Text Messages Robinson: "I have a chance to take out Charlie Kirk, I'm going to take it." Boyfriend: what? You’re joking right? Robinson: I'm still okay, my love, but stuck (not clear).. I've got to grab my rifle still. To be honest, I had hoped to keep the secret until I died of old age. I am sorry to involve you. Boyfriend: you were the one who did it, right? Robinson: I am. I am. I’m sorry. Boyfriend: I thought they caught the person? Robinson: no they grabbed some crazy old dude and interrogated someone in similar clothing. I planned to grab my rifle from my drop point shortly after. Most of that side of town got locked down. It’s quiet almost enough to get out, but one vehicle lingering. Boyfriend: why? Robinson: why did I do it? Boyfriend: yeah Robinson: I’ve had enough of his hatred. Some hate can’t be negotiated out. If I’m able to grab my rifle unseen, I will have left no evidence. Going to attempt to retrieve it again. Hopefully they’ve moved on. I haven’t seen anything about them finding it Boyfriend: How long have you been planning this? Robinson: a bit over a week. I can get close to it, but there’s a squad car parked right by it. I think they already swept that spot but don’t want to chance it. I’m wishing I circled back and grabbed it as soon as I got back to my vehicle. I’m worried what my old man would do if I didn’t bring back grandpas rifle. Idk if it has a serial number but wouldn’t trace to me. I worry about prints, I had to leave it in a bush where I changed outfits. Didn’t have the ability to time to bring it with. I might have to abandon it and hope they don’t find prints. How the F will I explain losing it to my old man. Only thing I left was the rifle left in the towel. The f’ing messages are mostly a big meme… judgement today, I’d say grandpas gun does just fine, I think that’s as a $2k scope. Robinson: Delete this exchange. My dad wants photos of the rifle. Grandpa wants to know who has what. The Feds released a photo of the rifle and it’s very unique. He’s calling me RN. Robinson: Since Trump got into office my dad has been pretty die hard MAGA. I’m gonna turn myself in willingly. One of my neighbors is a deputy for the sheriff. You are all I worry about love. I’m much more worried about you. Don’t talk to the media please, don’t take any interviews, or make any comments. If any police ask you questions, ask for a lawyer and stay silent.” I AM NOT BUYING IT…. YOU? https://rumble.com/v6z1llw-utah-district-attorney-discusses-tyler-robinson-text-messages-and-that-he-w.html

Video Transcript AI Summary
On 09/10/2025, the roommate received a text from Robinson: "drop what you're doing. Look under my keyboard." The roommate found a note: "I had the opportunity to take out Charlie Kirk, and I'm going to take it." Police photographed the note. Exchange places Robinson in Orem, planning to grab 'my rifle' and saying they hoped to keep it secret 'till I died of old age.' Roommate asks if Robinson did it; "Robinson. No." They discuss retrieving the rifle, concerns about prints and a possible serial number, and that it was 'grandpa's rifle.' The feds released a photo of the rifle, and it is very unique. Robinson says, "I'm gonna turn myself in willingly." A neighbor is a sheriff's deputy; "Don't talk to the media, please. Don't take any interviews or make any comments. If any police ask you questions, ask for a lawyer and stay silent." The search for Robin
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: On 09/10/2025, the roommate received a text message from Robinson which said, drop what you're doing. Look under my keyboard. The roommate looked under the keyboard and found a note that stated, quote, I had the opportunity to take out Charlie Kirk, and I'm going to take it. Police found a photograph of this note. The following exchange, text exchange then took place. After reading the note, the roommate responded, what? You're joking. Right? Robinson, I am still okay, my love, but I'm stuck in Orem for a little while longer yet. Shouldn't be long until I can come home, but I gotta grab my rifle still. To be honest, I had hoped to keep this secret till I died of old age. I am sorry to involve you. Roommate, you weren't the one who did it. Right? Robinson, I am. I am. I'm sorry. Roommate, I thought they caught the person. Robinson. No. They grabbed some crazy old dude, then interrogated someone in similar clothing. I had planned to grab my rifle from my drop point shortly after, but most of that side of town got locked down. It's quiet, almost enough to get out, but there's one vehicle lingering. Roommate. Why? Robinson. Why did I do it? Roommate. Yeah. Robinson. I had enough of his hatred. Some hate can't be negotiated out. If I am able to grab my rifle unseen, I will have left no evidence. Going to attempt to retrieve it again. Hopefully, they have moved on. I haven't seen anything about them finding it. Roommate, how long have you been planning this? Robinson, a bit over a week, I believe. I can get close to it, but there is a squad car parked right by it. I think they already swept that spot, but I don't wanna chance it. Robinson again. I'm wishing I had circled back and grabbed it as soon as I got to my vehicle. I'm worried what my old man would do if I didn't bring back grandpa's rifle. IDEK if it's had a serial number, but it wouldn't trace to me. I worry about prints. I had to leave it in a bush where I changed outfits. Didn't have the ability or time to bring it with. I might have to abandon it and hope they don't find prints. How the f will I explain losing it to my old man? Only thing I left was the rapple was the rifle wrapped in a towel. Remember how he was engraving bullets? The effing messages are mostly a big meme. If I see notice bulge, UWU on Fox New, I might have a stroke alright. I'm gonna have to leave it. That really effing sucks. Judging from today, I'd say grandpa's gun does just fine IDK. I think that was a tooth a a 2 k dollar scope. Scope. Wink. Wink. Robinson. Again. Delete this exchange. Again, Robinson. My dad wants photos of the rifle. Rifle. He says grandpa wants to know who has what. The feds released a photo of the rifle, and it is very unique. He's calling me, RN, not answering. Robinson, since Trump got into office, my dad has been pretty diehard MAGA. Robinson, I'm gonna turn myself in willingly. One of my neighbors here is a deputy for the sheriff. Again, you are all I worry about love. That came from Robinson. Roommate, I'm much more worried about you. Robinson, don't talk to the media, please. Don't take any interviews or make any comments. If any police ask you questions, ask for a lawyer and stay silent. The search for Robin

@MJTruthUltra - MJTruthUltra

UPDATE: Charlie Kirk BREAKING - The man who originally took credit for Charlie Kirk’s Assassination, George Zinn, has now been charged with possessing child porn. Life comes at you fast dipshit… ICYMI… • April 15, 2013 George Zinn sent an email threat four days after the Boston Marathon bombing to Marathon Organizers placing bombs at the finish line, which he later claimed was a joke. • He was also used a few times in interviews remembering 9/11. He has now charged for kiddie porn. Was this why he took credit for it/cause a distraction?

@MJTruthUltra - MJTruthUltra

UPDATE: Charlie Kirk 🚨 A Group called "Armed Queers Salt Lake City" (AQSLC) is under FBI Investigation for Possible Foreknowledge of Charlie Kirk’s Assassination • The leader of this group Ermiya Fanaeian, is reportedly a Iranian-born Transgender man, with Biden era State https://t.co/0dREZKS0cg

Video Transcript AI Summary
Regular medical students, wearing white coats, spoke about being the reason that America’s calling you terrorists: 'we're the reason that America's calling you terrorists.' They added, 'if we're terrorists, we're proud to be terrorists because we're sending doctors around the world. And if that's our terror, then so be it.' Right? But here's this little island, a couple of miles away from America, you know, 90 miles away from America, and they have an a president who talks like us. They have a president who understands the need for a liberated Palestine. And I think that was, that definitely altered my world.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: These students who were regular medical students, they came and spoke and basically what they were saying was they were wearing their white coats, know, they looked like medical students. They were like, we're the reason that America's calling you terrorists. And they were saying, well, if we're terrorists, we're proud to be terrorists because we're sending doctors around the world. And if that's our terror, then so be it. Yep. Right? But here's this little island, a couple of miles away from America, you know, 90 miles away from America, and they have an a president who talks like us. They have a president who understands the need for a liberated Palestine. And I think that was, that definitely altered my world.
MJTruthUltra
Posted - September 16, 2025 at 7:33 PM
Saved - September 17, 2025 at 5:05 AM

@MJTruthUltra - MJTruthUltra

Tyler Robinson’s Text Exchange with boyfriend: This is the most convenient confession and accounting of events in the history of mankind Drop a 💩if you call Bullshit https://t.co/7teNzzLozr

@MJTruthUltra - MJTruthUltra

UPDATE: Charlie Kirk Utah District Attorney discusses Tyler Robinson Text Messages.. and I’m sorry, it sounds like a bunch of baloney 🔻 Text Messages Robinson: "I have a chance to take out Charlie Kirk, I'm going to take it." Boyfriend: what? You’re joking right? Robinson: I'm still okay, my love, but stuck (not clear).. I've got to grab my rifle still. To be honest, I had hoped to keep the secret until I died of old age. I am sorry to involve you. Boyfriend: you were the one who did it, right? Robinson: I am. I am. I’m sorry. Boyfriend: I thought they caught the person? Robinson: no they grabbed some crazy old dude and interrogated someone in similar clothing. I planned to grab my rifle from my drop point shortly after. Most of that side of town got locked down. It’s quiet almost enough to get out, but one vehicle lingering. Boyfriend: why? Robinson: why did I do it? Boyfriend: yeah Robinson: I’ve had enough of his hatred. Some hate can’t be negotiated out. If I’m able to grab my rifle unseen, I will have left no evidence. Going to attempt to retrieve it again. Hopefully they’ve moved on. I haven’t seen anything about them finding it Boyfriend: How long have you been planning this? Robinson: a bit over a week. I can get close to it, but there’s a squad car parked right by it. I think they already swept that spot but don’t want to chance it. I’m wishing I circled back and grabbed it as soon as I got back to my vehicle. I’m worried what my old man would do if I didn’t bring back grandpas rifle. Idk if it has a serial number but wouldn’t trace to me. I worry about prints, I had to leave it in a bush where I changed outfits. Didn’t have the ability to time to bring it with. I might have to abandon it and hope they don’t find prints. How the F will I explain losing it to my old man. Only thing I left was the rifle left in the towel. The f’ing messages are mostly a big meme… judgement today, I’d say grandpas gun does just fine, I think that’s as a $2k scope. Robinson: Delete this exchange. My dad wants photos of the rifle. Grandpa wants to know who has what. The Feds released a photo of the rifle and it’s very unique. He’s calling me RN. Robinson: Since Trump got into office my dad has been pretty die hard MAGA. I’m gonna turn myself in willingly. One of my neighbors is a deputy for the sheriff. You are all I worry about love. I’m much more worried about you. Don’t talk to the media please, don’t take any interviews, or make any comments. If any police ask you questions, ask for a lawyer and stay silent.” I AM NOT BUYING IT…. YOU? https://rumble.com/v6z1llw-utah-district-attorney-discusses-tyler-robinson-text-messages-and-that-he-w.html

Video Transcript AI Summary
On 09/10/2025, the roommate received a text from Robinson: "drop what you're doing. Look under my keyboard." The roommate found a note stating, "I had the opportunity to take out Charlie Kirk, and I'm going to take it." Police found a photograph of this note. The exchange reveals Robinson's plan to retrieve a rifle, noting he is "stuck in Orem for a little while longer yet. Shouldn't be long until I can come home, but I gotta grab my rifle still." He says, "To be honest, I had hoped to keep this secret till I died of old age. I am sorry to involve you." He adds, "I had enough of his hatred. Some hate can't be negotiated out. If I am able to grab my rifle unseen, I will have left no evidence." He describes hiding the rifle, "Only thing I left was the rapple was the rifle wrapped in a towel." He mentions grandpa's gun, "The feds released a photo of the rifle, and it is very unique." He notes, "since Trump got into office, my dad has been pretty diehard MAGA." He intends, "I'm gonna turn myself in willingly." He warns, "Don't talk to the media, please. Don't take any interviews or make any comments. If any police ask you questions, ask for a lawyer and stay silent." "One of my neighbors here is a deputy for the sheriff." My dad wants photos of the rifle.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: On 09/10/2025, the roommate received a text message from Robinson which said, drop what you're doing. Look under my keyboard. The roommate looked under the keyboard and found a note that stated, quote, I had the opportunity to take out Charlie Kirk, and I'm going to take it. Police found a photograph of this note. The following exchange, text exchange then took place. After reading the note, the roommate responded, what? You're joking. Right? Robinson, I am still okay, my love, but I'm stuck in Orem for a little while longer yet. Shouldn't be long until I can come home, but I gotta grab my rifle still. To be honest, I had hoped to keep this secret till I died of old age. I am sorry to involve you. Roommate, you weren't the one who did it. Right? Robinson, I am. I am. I'm sorry. Roommate, I thought they caught the person. Robinson. No. They grabbed some crazy old dude, then interrogated someone in similar clothing. I had planned to grab my rifle from my drop point shortly after, but most of that side of town got locked down. It's quiet, almost enough to get out, but there's one vehicle lingering. Roommate. Why? Robinson. Why did I do it? Roommate. Yeah. Robinson. I had enough of his hatred. Some hate can't be negotiated out. If I am able to grab my rifle unseen, I will have left no evidence. Going to attempt to retrieve it again. Hopefully, they have moved on. I haven't seen anything about them finding it. Roommate, how long have you been planning this? Robinson, a bit over a week, I believe. I can get close to it, but there is a squad car parked right by it. I think they already swept that spot, but I don't wanna chance it. Robinson again. I'm wishing I had circled back and grabbed it as soon as I got to my vehicle. I'm worried what my old man would do if I didn't bring back grandpa's rifle. IDEK if it's had a serial number, but it wouldn't trace to me. I worry about prints. I had to leave it in a bush where I changed outfits. Didn't have the ability or time to bring it with. I might have to abandon it and hope they don't find prints. How the f will I explain losing it to my old man? Only thing I left was the rapple was the rifle wrapped in a towel. Remember how he was engraving bullets? The effing messages are mostly a big meme. If I see notice bulge, UWU on Fox News, I might have a stroke alright. I'm gonna have to leave it. That really effing sucks. Judging from today, I'd say grandpa's gun does just fine IDK. I think that was a tooth a a 2 k dollar scope. Scope. Wink. Wink. Robinson. Again. Delete this exchange. Again, Robinson. My dad wants photos of the rifle. Rifle. He says grandpa wants to know who has what. The feds released a photo of the rifle, and it is very unique. He's calling me, RN, not answering. Robinson, since Trump got into office, my dad has been pretty diehard MAGA. Robinson, I'm gonna turn myself in willingly. One of my neighbors here is a deputy for the sheriff. Again, you are all I worry about love. That came from Robinson. Roommate, I'm much more worried about you. Robinson, don't talk to the media, please. Don't take any interviews or make any comments. If any police ask you questions, ask for a lawyer and stay silent. The search for Robin

@MJTruthUltra - MJTruthUltra

UPDATE: Charlie Kirk BREAKING - The man who originally took credit for Charlie Kirk’s Assassination, George Zinn, has now been charged with possessing child porn. Life comes at you fast dipshit… ICYMI… • April 15, 2013 George Zinn sent an email threat four days after the https://t.co/XqAfzBH4qe

LibertyLockPod
Posted - September 16, 2025 at 8:02 PM
Saved - September 17, 2025 at 6:01 AM

@LibertyLockPod - Clint Russell

A 22-year-old thought he could text every detail of his assassination plot to his boyfriend and telling them to delete the messages would be adequate to cover his tracks. Really? I mean... Really?

@bennyjohnson - Benny Johnson

BREAKING: Utah County DA reads the full text message exchange between Charlie Kirk’s assassin and his transgender boyfriend/roommate after committing the murder: ROBINSON: "Drop what you're doing, look under my keyboard." ROOMMATE: "You are joking right?" ROBINSON: "I am still okay, my love. Shouldn't be long until I can come home, but I gotta grab my rifle still. To be honest, I had hoped to keep this secret till I died of old age. I am sorry to involve you." ROOMMATE: "You weren't the one who did it, right?" ROBINSON: "I am, I am, I'm sorry." ROOMMATE: "I thought they caught the person." ROBINSON: "No, they grabbed some crazy old dude, then interrogated someone in similar clothing. I had planned to grab my rifle from my drop point shortly after, but most of that side of town got locked down. It's quiet, almost enough to get out, but there's one vehicle lingering." ROOMMATE: "Why?" ROBINSON: "Why did I do it? I had enough of his hatred. Some hate can't be negotiated out. If I am able to grab my rifle unseen, I will have left no evidence. Going to attempt to retrieve it again. Hopefully they have moved on. I haven't seen anything about them finding it." ROOMMATE: "How long have you been planning this?" ROBINSON: "A bit over a week, I believe. I can get close to it, but there is a squad car parked right by it. I think they already swept that spot, but I don't want to chance it. I'm wishing I had circled back and grabbed it as soon as I got to my vehicle. I'm worried what my old man would do if I didn't bring back Grandpa's rifle. IDEK if it had a serial number, but it wouldn't trace to me. I worry about prints. I had to leave it in a bush where I changed outfits. I might have to abandon it and hope they don't find prints." "How the F will I explain losing it to my old man? Only thing I left was the rifle wrapped in a towel. Remember how he was engraving bullets? The F in messages are mostly a big meme. If I see notice bulge U-W-U on Fox News, I might have a stroke, all right, I'm gonna have to leave it. That really F in sucks. Judging from today, I'd say grandpa's gun does just fine IDK. I think that was a 2K dollar scope." "Delete this exchange. My dad wants photos of the rifle. He says, Grandpa wants to know who has what. The feds released a photo of the rifle and it is very unique. He's calling me, RN. Not answering. Since Trump got into office, my dad has been pretty diehard MAGA. I'm gonna turn myself in willingly. One of my neighbors here is a deputy for the sheriff. Again, you are all I worry about love. Don't take any interviews or make any comments. If any police ask you questions, ask for a lawyer and stay silent."

Video Transcript AI Summary
Police interviewed Robinson's roommate, who was in a romantic relationship with Robinson, about messages regarding the shooting. On 09/10/2025, Robinson texted: "drop what you're doing. Look under my keyboard." The roommate found a note reading: "I had the opportunity to take out Charlie Kirk, and I'm going to take it." A photo of the note was recovered. In an exchange that followed, the roommate asked, "what? You're joking." Robinson replied, "Right? Robinson, I am still okay, my love, but I'm stuck in Orem for a little while longer yet. Shouldn't be long until I can come home, but I gotta grab my rifle still." He said, "To be honest, I had hoped to keep this secret till I died of old age. I am sorry." He added, "I had enough of his hatred. Some hate can't be negotiated out. If I am able to grab my rifle unseen, I will have left no evidence." The conversation touched on serial numbers, prints, "grandpa's gun," engraving bullets, memes, and plans to turn himself in; he instructed, "Don't talk to the media, please. Don't take any interviews or make any comments. If any police ask you questions, ask for a lawyer and stay silent." The text ends with "The search for Robin".
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The roommate. Police interviewed Robinson's roommate, a biological male who was was involved in a romantic relationship with Robinson. The roommate told police that the roommate received messages from Robinson about the shooting, and and he did provide those messages to police. On 09/10/2025, the roommate received a text message from Robinson which said, drop what you're doing. Look under my keyboard. The roommate looked under the keyboard and found a note that stated, quote, I had the opportunity to take out Charlie Kirk, and I'm going to take it. Police found a photograph of this note. The following exchange text exchange then took place. After reading the note, the roommate responded, what? You're joking. Right? Robinson, I am still okay, my love, but I'm stuck in Orem for a little while longer yet. Shouldn't be long until I can come home, but I gotta grab my rifle still. To be honest, I had hoped to keep this secret till I died of old age. I am sorry to involve you. Roommate, you weren't the one who did it. Right? Robinson, I am. I am. I'm sorry. Roommate, I thought they caught the person. Robinson, no. They grabbed some crazy old dude, then interrogated someone in similar clothing. I had planned to grab my rifle from my drop point shortly after, but most of that side of town got locked down. It's quiet, almost enough to get out, but there's one vehicle lingering. Roommate. Why? Robinson. Why did I do it? Roommate. Yeah. Robinson. I had enough of his hatred. Some hate can't be negotiated out. If I am able to grab my rifle unseen, I will have left no evidence. Going to attempt to retrieve it again. Hopefully, they have moved on. I haven't seen anything about them finding it. Roommate, how long have you been planning this? Robinson, a bit over a week, I believe. I can get close to it, but there is a squad car parked right by it. I think they already swept that spot, but I don't wanna chance it. Robinson again. I'm wishing I had circled back and grabbed it as soon as I got to my vehicle. I'm worried what my old man would do if I didn't bring back grandpa's rifle. I d e k if it's had a serial number, but it wouldn't trace to me. I worry about prints. I had to leave it in a bush where I changed outfits. Didn't have the ability or time to bring it with. I might have to abandon it and hope they don't find prints. How the f will I explain losing it to my old man? Only thing I left was the rapple was the rifle wrapped in a towel. Remember how I was engraving bullets? The f in messages are mostly a big meme. If I see notice bulge u w u on Fox New, I might have a stroke alright. I'm gonna have to leave it. That really effing sucks. Judging from today, I'd say grandpa's gun does just fine IDK. I think that was a 2 a a 2 k dollar scope. Wink. Wink. Robinson. Robinson again. Delete this exchange. Again, Robinson. My dad wants photos of the rifle. He says grandpa wants to know who has what. The feds released a photo of the rifle, and it is very unique. He's calling me, RN, not answering. Robinson, since Trump got into office, my dad has been pretty diehard MAGA. Robinson, I'm gonna turn myself in willingly. One of my neighbors here is a deputy for the sheriff. Again, you are all I worry about love. That came from Robinson. Roommate, I'm much more worried about you. Robinson, don't talk to the media, please. Don't take any interviews or make any comments. If any police ask you questions, ask for a lawyer and stay silent. The search for Robin
HustleBitch_
Posted - September 16, 2025 at 8:09 PM
Saved - September 17, 2025 at 5:48 AM

@HustleBitch_ - HustleBitch

IS THIS IT? Is this officially the DUMBEST thing the U.S. government has ever tried to force the American people to believe? https://t.co/OnqZdfKlk4

Inversionism
Posted - September 16, 2025 at 8:50 PM
Saved - September 17, 2025 at 5:48 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The conversations between Robinson and his trans roommate seem completely fabricated, almost like a plot from an intel agency to wrap up the case. It's hard to believe someone with a 34 ACT score would be so reckless in covering up an assassination and then confessing online. They think we're naive.

@Inversionism - Inversionism

The texts between Robinson and his trans roommate are totally unbelievable and it reads like it was contrived by an intel agency to close the case. No one, especially someone who got a 34 on his ACT, would be dumb enough to go to such lengths to cover up his assassination and then just openly admit to everything in great detail in writing on the internet. They think we're retarded.

MJTruthUltra
Posted - September 16, 2025 at 9:47 PM
Saved - September 17, 2025 at 5:01 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared an update about Charlie Kirk, highlighting Candace Owens' claim that the recently released text messages are doctored. She pointed out the use of ellipses and the absence of timestamps as signs of cherry-picking. I found her arguments compelling.

@MJTruthUltra - MJTruthUltra

UPDATE: Charlie Kirk Candace Owens: The Text Messages Released today are clearly Doctored! Around some of the text messages, there is an Ellipses (…), which is an indication that the text messages were cherry-picked for release to the public. There are also no timestamps.. Very good points.. Clip https://rumble.com/v6z1te6-candace-owens-the-text-messages-released-today-are-clearly-doctored.html Full Show https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=q7f8r-THr84&pp=uAQw

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 notes, “not always… around some of these exchanges, there’s ellipses above them,” and adds it looks like they’re “cherry picking certain exchanges… Yeah. My dad is super MAGA just comes out of nowhere because they picked it from a totally different part of the conversation.” Speaker 1 replies, “These messages are clearly doctored is what I would say. They’re doctored.” They speculate why, suggesting, “Tyler’s being corp you know, forthcoming. We’re protecting him in some capacity.” They call it “unacceptable. K? Unacceptable. I want every single text message. I want time stamps.” They argue it’s “conspicuous that you are not telling us when this was sent because it sounds like it’s when the campus is on lockdown, and he’s gotta go back and gotta clean up. And then all of a sudden, we’re in the next day when his dad is getting clued in after the picture’s been released.” They conclude, “They’re not telling us that. Okay? … We need full answers.”
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Not always. I just noticed that around some of these exchanges, there's ellipses above them. Speaker 1: You're breaking up a little bit. What'd say? Speaker 0: Around some of these exchanges, there's ellipses above if you look really closely. Yeah. And it looks like they're cherry picking certain exchanges. So that Yeah. My dad is super MAGA just comes out of nowhere because they picked it from a totally different part of the conversation. Speaker 1: Yeah. These messages are clearly doctored is what I would say. They're doctored. Now they could decide why they're doing that. Tyler's being corp you know, forthcoming. We're protecting him in some capacity. I find that to be unacceptable. K? Unacceptable. I want every single text message. I want time stamps. It's it is conspicuous that you are not telling us when this was sent because it sounds like it's when the campus is on lockdown, and he's gotta go back and gotta clean up. And then all of a sudden, we're in the next day when his dad is getting clued in after the picture's been released. They're not telling us that. Okay? And you have a right to be a little bit uncomfortable about that because I'm a lot of bit uncomfortable about that. We need full answers.

@MJTruthUltra - MJTruthUltra

Tyler Robinson’s Text Exchange with boyfriend: This is the most convenient confession and accounting of events in the history of mankind Drop a 💩if you call Bullshit https://t.co/7teNzzLozr

@MJTruthUltra - MJTruthUltra

UPDATE: Charlie Kirk Utah District Attorney discusses Tyler Robinson Text Messages.. and I’m sorry, it sounds like a bunch of baloney 🔻 Text Messages Robinson: "I have a chance to take out Charlie Kirk, I'm going to take it." Boyfriend: what? You’re joking right? https://t.co/SqKvF7VKdH

Video Transcript AI Summary
On 09/10/2025, the roommate received a text from Robinson: "drop what you're doing. Look under my keyboard." The roommate found a note: "I had the opportunity to take out Charlie Kirk, and I'm going to take it." Police found a photograph of the note. In a later exchange, Robinson says he is "still okay, my love," but "I'm stuck in Orem... I gotta grab my rifle still." He adds, "I had hoped to keep this secret till I died of old age. I am sorry to involve you." The roommate asks, "You weren't the one who did it. Right?" Robinson: "I am." They discuss planning for "a bit over a week," leaving no evidence, and the risk of being seen near a drop point. They mention "grandpa's rifle," possible prints, and a squad car nearby. The feds released "a photo of the rifle," and it is "very unique." He notes MAGA: "since Trump got into office, my dad has been pretty diehard MAGA." He says, "I'm gonna turn myself in willingly." He warns: "If any police ask you questions, ask for a lawyer and stay silent."
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: On 09/10/2025, the roommate received a text message from Robinson which said, drop what you're doing. Look under my keyboard. The roommate looked under the keyboard and found a note that stated, quote, I had the opportunity to take out Charlie Kirk, and I'm going to take it. Police found a photograph of this note. The following exchange, text exchange then took place. After reading the note, the roommate responded, what? You're joking. Right? Robinson, I am still okay, my love, but I'm stuck in Orem for a little while longer yet. Shouldn't be long until I can come home, but I gotta grab my rifle still. To be honest, I had hoped to keep this secret till I died of old age. I am sorry to involve you. Roommate, you weren't the one who did it. Right? Robinson, I am. I am. I'm sorry. Roommate, I thought they caught the person. Robinson. No. They grabbed some crazy old dude, then interrogated someone in similar clothing. I had planned to grab my rifle from my drop point shortly after, but most of that side of town got locked down. It's quiet, almost enough to get out, but there's one vehicle lingering. Roommate. Why? Robinson. Why did I do it? Roommate. Yeah. Robinson. I had enough of his hatred. Some hate can't be negotiated out. If I am able to grab my rifle unseen, I will have left no evidence. Going to attempt to retrieve it again. Hopefully, they have moved on. I haven't seen anything about them finding it. Roommate, how long have you been planning this? Robinson, a bit over a week, I believe. I can get close to it, but there is a squad car parked right by it. I think they already swept that spot, but I don't wanna chance it. Robinson again. I'm wishing I had circled back and grabbed it as soon as I got to my vehicle. I'm worried what my old man would do if I didn't bring back grandpa's rifle. IDEK if it's had a serial number, but it wouldn't trace to me. I worry about prints. I had to leave it in a bush where I changed outfits. Didn't have the ability or time to bring it with. I might have to abandon it and hope they don't find prints. How the f will I explain losing it to my old man? Only thing I left was the rapple was the rifle wrapped in a towel. Remember how he was engraving bullets? The effing messages are mostly a big meme. If I see notice bulge, UWU on Fox News, I might have a stroke alright. I'm gonna have to leave it. That really effing sucks. Judging from today, I'd say grandpa's gun does just fine IDK. I think that was a tooth a a 2 k dollar scope. Scope. Wink. Wink. Robinson. Again. Delete this exchange. Again, Robinson. My dad wants photos of the rifle. Rifle. He says grandpa wants to know who has what. The feds released a photo of the rifle, and it is very unique. He's calling me, RN, not answering. Robinson, since Trump got into office, my dad has been pretty diehard MAGA. Robinson, I'm gonna turn myself in willingly. One of my neighbors here is a deputy for the sheriff. Again, you are all I worry about love. That came from Robinson. Roommate, I'm much more worried about you. Robinson, don't talk to the media, please. Don't take any interviews or make any comments. If any police ask you questions, ask for a lawyer and stay silent. The search for Robin
MJTruthUltra
Posted - September 16, 2025 at 10:10 PM
Saved - September 17, 2025 at 5:01 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I provided an update regarding Charlie Kirk, where Candace Owens shared insights from her conversation with the family of Tyler Robinson's boyfriend, Lance Twiggs. It was revealed that Twiggs faced significant challenges, including being kicked out by his parents and struggling with substance abuse. He and Tyler had been living together for over a year. Notably, there were reports of unusual traffic at their home leading up to the assassination, raising questions about the circumstances surrounding the event.

@MJTruthUltra - MJTruthUltra

UPDATE: Charlie Kirk Candace Owens claims to have Spoken to the Family of Tyler Robinson’s Trans Boyfriend — There was an Unusual Amount of Vehicles at their home leading up to the Assassination 🔻 Boyfriend Lance Twiggs.. allegedly - parents kicked him out - he almost overdosed - showed up on drugs on Easter, spouting political stuff - family is unhappy the media is presenting him as a soft person - he was a “deep web” “dark web” person, always online - he was doing some kind of plumbing work for money - He and Tyler were living together for at least 1 year The most interesting claim… people in the neighborhood, as well as Twiggs family, says there was an “unusual amount of traffic/cars” at their home in the days/week leading up to the shooting. Clip https://rumble.com/v6z1uv2-candace-owens-claims-to-have-spoken-to-the-family-of-tyler-robinsons-trans-.html Full Interview https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=q7f8r-THr84&pp=uAQw

Video Transcript AI Summary
Lance Twigg went to live with relatives, not with his mother and father; allegedly his parents kicked him out junior year because he was problematic. He had issues, including drinking; around Christmas three years ago he almost overdosed after drinking a bottle of vodka, with the family present. After high school, extended family says they couldn’t keep him due to his behavior. This Easter Sunday he appeared on drugs, spouting political stuff; they felt he could not be around children, increasingly radical and dangerous. They dispute media portrayal, saying more people are involved. They say he was deep web, reclusive, always on devices. He turned 22 in August and was into dark web stuff. He and Tyler lived in a townhome; Tyler paid rent to Lance, who forwarded it to family. Unusual traffic—cars not recognized—before shooting; timeline clarified. There is very clearly more people involved; decoy boy and George Zinn mentioned.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Okay? I'm gonna pull this up because I took notes regarding Lance because I wanna know everything. Okay? Lance, they told us, went to live with his relatives. So no longer in the house with his mother and father, again, allegedly, allegedly, allegedly, his parents kicked him out junior year of high school because he was problematic. He just had issues. And at that time when they kicked him out, that wasn't exactly what they are saying legal for them to have done that. But, again, he went to live with relatives, and he has issues. They they say that he allegedly has a lot of issues with drinking that Christmas approximately three years ago. He almost overdosed. He drank a bottle of vodka. They are telling me that they were there. They were present for this. And fear began to spread about whether or not even the family would be able to take care of him because of issues that he was having. Okay. He graduates high school, and then essentially, the extended family says, you know, we we can't keep you in our home because of his behavior. Just this past Easter Sunday, they are telling me that he showed up on drugs, and he was spouting out of his mouth about political stuff. And at this point, they felt that he could not be around children, that they felt that he had become increasingly more radical, increasingly more dangerous, and just sort of off the rails. They said that they he they're unhappy that the media is presenting him in this, like, manner. Like, he's just this kinda, like, soft soft guy or, like, you know, a person that was just transitioning. There's, like, nothing problematic. There's no prodding. They don't buy the story. Okay? Lance's family is telling me that they are not buying the current story and that they feel that more people are involved. First and foremost, they say that a lot of information should be able to be discerned by his devices because he was, according to them, deep web. Okay? This is the person that is deep on the Internet. They said that he was quite reclusive, that he was always on his devices, that he's always on the web, and that there should be more information that comes from there. Okay? He turned 22, they told me back in August, and that he was, as I said, very into this dark web stuff. I asked what he was doing for work. Like, how are they even able to pay you guys rent? And they told me that he was doing some plumbing work with somebody else in the family. They told us that Tyler and him had been living together for at least a year, that, they had not met Tyler despite the fact that Lance had wanted to foster that meeting, that they the two of them, this couple, Tyler and Lance, were living in that townhome that is owned by Lance's family and that Tyler was paying rent to Lance. And Lance then, of course, was forwarding that payment to then. Now I had asked them about another persistent rumor that is arriving in my inbox, which people are saying, who live in the neighborhood, that they noticed some unusual traffic. And this individual family member said to me, yep. We are hearing the exact same thing. That they would prod that narrative further, but there were some unusual traffic. A lot of cars that were seen outside leading up to the shooting in the days before the shooting or the week before the shooting. I'll straighten out that timeline for you and get real specific because that's I I will pin down when exactly this was happening. But leading up to the shooting that there were unusual unusual traffic in the driveway where Tyler Robinson and Lance lived. Cars that were not recognized in the neighborhood. They did they this was not a couple that hosted people. It wasn't like they were expecting them to have parties. And so other people are saying that that is something that struck them as odd. There was unusual traffic out of this house in the weeks leading up to this shooting. And, I will perfect that timeline of exactly when. And I have gone out to people for evidence of that, But there were apparently lots of different license plates, and it therefore caused a little neighborhood, you know, kerfuffle because other people were not able to park their cars because there were so many people that were at this house. Unusual traffic. Again, we are prodding that narrative. We are taking a look at everybody because if I don't feel good about what we're hearing, okay, and Lance Twigg's family doesn't feel good about what we're hearing. And we've got decoy boy who's apparently involved in some deep Internet stuff, I would say. It's a fair way to describe it. Decoy boy. Okay. George Zinn. There's more people involved. That's what I'm gonna say to you guys. There is very clearly more people involved. Okay?

@MJTruthUltra - MJTruthUltra

UPDATE: Charlie Kirk Candace Owens: The Text Messages Released today are clearly Doctored! Around some of the text messages, there is an Ellipses (…), which is an indication that the text messages were cherry-picked for release to the public. There are also no timestamps.. Very good points.. Clip https://rumble.com/v6z1te6-candace-owens-the-text-messages-released-today-are-clearly-doctored.html Full Show https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=q7f8r-THr84&pp=uAQw

Video Transcript AI Summary
Not always. I just noticed that around some of these exchanges, there's ellipses above them. It looks like they're cherry picking certain exchanges. So that 'My dad is super MAGA' just comes out of nowhere because they picked it from a totally different part of the conversation. These messages are clearly doctored is what I would say. They're doctored. Tyler's being corp you know, forthcoming. We're protecting him in some capacity. I find that to be unacceptable. K? Unacceptable. I want every single text message. I want time stamps. It is conspicuous that you are not telling us when this was sent because it sounds like it's when the campus is on lockdown, and he's gotta go back and gotta clean up. And then the next day when his dad is getting clued in after the picture's been released. They're not telling us that. Okay? We need full answers.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Not always. I just noticed that around some of these exchanges, there's ellipses above them. Speaker 1: You're breaking up a little bit. What'd say? Speaker 0: Around some of these exchanges, there's ellipses above if you look really closely. Yeah. And it looks like they're cherry picking certain exchanges. So that Yeah. My dad is super MAGA just comes out of nowhere because they picked it from a totally different part of the conversation. Speaker 1: Yeah. These messages are clearly doctored is what I would say. They're doctored. Now they could decide why they're doing that. Tyler's being corp you know, forthcoming. We're protecting him in some capacity. I find that to be unacceptable. K? Unacceptable. I want every single text message. I want time stamps. It's it is conspicuous that you are not telling us when this was sent because it sounds like it's when the campus is on lockdown, and he's gotta go back and gotta clean up. And then all of a sudden, we're in the next day when his dad is getting clued in after the picture's been released. They're not telling us that. Okay? And you have a right to be a little bit uncomfortable about that because I'm a lot of bit uncomfortable about that. We need full answers.

@MJTruthUltra - MJTruthUltra

Tyler Robinson’s Text Exchange with boyfriend: This is the most convenient confession and accounting of events in the history of mankind Drop a 💩if you call Bullshit https://t.co/IznDbTRu9C

TheIntelSCIF
Posted - September 16, 2025 at 10:42 PM
Saved - September 19, 2025 at 12:54 AM

@TheIntelSCIF - The SCIF

@ShadowofEzra Nobody from this generation talks like this: "I am still ok my love." "I got to my vehicle...I'm worried what my old man would do if I didn't bring back grandpas rifle." https://t.co/5tbDd1tg9p

HustleBitch_
Posted - September 17, 2025 at 12:32 AM
Saved - September 17, 2025 at 5:42 AM

@HustleBitch_ - HustleBitch

Prosecutors have just released the "official" text message exchange between Tyler James Robinson and his roommate. Which part of this feels totally planned and scripted to you? https://t.co/mLlqAvL4ln

HustleBitch_
Posted - September 17, 2025 at 12:45 AM
Saved - September 17, 2025 at 5:40 AM

@HustleBitch_ - HustleBitch

Do you know any 22-year-olds who text in full sentences, use punctuation…and call their car a “vehicle”? Or does that sound like the FBI wrote it? https://t.co/sM5n8CN7h2

MaxBlumenthal
Posted - September 18, 2025 at 2:07 AM
Saved - September 18, 2025 at 8:12 AM

@MaxBlumenthal - Max Blumenthal

CNN has created a graphic of supposed text messages between Tyler Robinson and his roommate based on Robinson’s charging documents to make them appear more convincingly real But as in the charging documents, there are no time stamps https://t.co/sLWfztRDxh

VladTheInflator
Posted - September 18, 2025 at 4:19 AM
Saved - September 18, 2025 at 6:39 PM

@VladTheInflator - Darth Powell

The letter is total bullshit https://t.co/52GAHPiliI

Video Transcript AI Summary
So everyone knows that these text messages are insanely fake, right? No one refers to their car as a vehicle, unless you're in law enforcement. Nobody says squad car. You would just say, Oh my God, I just saw a cop. No 22 year old refers to their parent as my old man. I left the rifle wrapped in a towel. Nobody would write step by step. And when he talks about the engravings, he says, mostly a big meme. You gotta read these texts for yourself, because nobody talks like this. Nobody texts like this, and no young person uses the words vehicle, drop point. This is just way too convenient.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So everyone knows that these text messages are insanely fake, right? No one refers to their car as a vehicle, unless you're in law enforcement. Nobody says squad car. You would just say, Oh my God, I just saw a cop. And why would Robinson be telling his roommate, who he's supposedly in a relationship, my dad has been pretty diehard MAGA. The person you're in a relationship would already know that. No 22 year old refers to their parent as my old man. Nobody would say, I worry about Prince. I don't know if it had a serial number. And he writes out very clearly a timeline. I had to leave it in a bush where I changed outfits, didn't have the time to bring it with me. I might have to abandon it. I left the rifle wrapped in a towel. Nobody would write step by step. And when he talks about the engravings, he says, mostly a big meme. Young people don't talk like that. Elon Musk talks like that when he's trying to be funny, and he's like, I am become meme. This is so obviously Gen X law enforcement trying to create a narrative. You gotta read these texts for yourself, because nobody talks like this. Nobody texts like this, and no young person uses the words vehicle, drop point. He talks about the other suspect that they grab They grabbed some crazy old dude in similar clothing, interrogated someone. How would he even know that? He's like stopping to look at the news at who they're grabbing. Why would he bother with all of those details? He would just be like, Oh my God, they grabbed someone else. Like when you're close with someone and you're texting, you don't write out all of your thoughts like that. You definitely don't write in paragraphs, complete sentences. This is just way too convenient.

@VladTheInflator - Darth Powell

Its bullshit, what kid says "vehicle" https://t.co/5P3JCX037R

ShaykhSulaiman
Posted - September 18, 2025 at 8:25 PM
Saved - September 19, 2025 at 12:54 AM

@ShaykhSulaiman - Sulaiman Ahmed

FBI RELEASE MORE LEAKED MESSAGES FROM TYLER ROBINSON https://t.co/X6tZuJWLG8

adamscochran
Posted - September 19, 2025 at 12:02 PM
Saved - September 19, 2025 at 5:03 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m raising serious concerns about the authenticity of the text messages in the Tyler Robinson case. They don’t sound like a 22-year-old gamer, and we lack timestamps and clarity on their platform. The FBI’s methods, including aggressive interrogation, could lead to coerced, paraphrased reconstructions rather than accurate representations. This could jeopardize the case, especially with capital punishment at stake. We need the original messages for transparency, as the current presentation risks misleading the jury with potentially altered meanings.

@adamscochran - Adam Cochran (adamscochran.eth)

1/5 WOW! According to reporting by the New York Times: The suspicious text messages between Tyler Robinson and his partner were *REPRODUCED* for the charging document. Raising even more questions about their authenticity! https://t.co/MfRZAIssed

@adamscochran - Adam Cochran (adamscochran.eth)

2/5 Not only do they not sound like a 22 year old gamer, but: -No one has seen any timestamps -We don’t know if they were text messages or on another platform like WhatsApp/Discord/Telegram And most importantly: -We don’t know if they are paraphrased https://t.co/p1KaBKqn5x

@adamscochran - Adam Cochran (adamscochran.eth)

3/5 For all we know, the FBI interrogated Robinson’s partner, under what they called “aggressive interrogation posture” Under coercion he could have “recounted” texts that they “reconstructed” https://t.co/1sMQuSp0gn

@adamscochran - Adam Cochran (adamscochran.eth)

4/5 Normally, especially in a case pursuing capital punishment, we’d expect these text messages provided in full form. Not cut, not paraphrased, not “reproduced”, and certainly not sounding like it was written by a 40 year old cop.

@adamscochran - Adam Cochran (adamscochran.eth)

5/5 Where are the original text messages? Why aren’t they included? Is any text missing from these that would change the tone or meaning? What are the time stamps? Do these texts even exist at all? This is another major screw up by the FBI that majorly risks this case! https://t.co/w8qclBgFg2

@adamscochran - Adam Cochran (adamscochran.eth)

It’s important to understand, I don’t think this means they are fully fake. They are likely paraphrased reconstructions from under interrogated duress - which actually makes them *MORE* dangerous/problematic:

@adamscochran - Adam Cochran (adamscochran.eth)

So let’s be clear, I am not saying they are fully fakes. What I think is likely is: -they had a text convo -they deleted that convo -the roommate/boyfriend was interrogated -he recounted the contents of that conversation under interrogation -the FBI reconstructed texts and asked “is this what it said” and he gave some general agreement -they gave that to prosecutors -prosecutors put it in charging doc without expressly saying how it was obtained -When trial finally happens, it will be so long after it happened that both parties will struggle to remember exact phrasing and prosecution won’t present these as word for word, but claim “didn’t you say this was basically the content/meaning of the texts?” And try and bully them into accepting that these paraphrased words were “within the spirit of” what they said. That’s dangerous because even if this is roughly what they said or recounted, specific word choice has huge impact on a jury.

@adamscochran - Adam Cochran (adamscochran.eth)

Many journalists are like “well that could just mean they copied it over” Sure - but it can also mean a lot of other things, and in the context of this administration it’s foolish to assume good faith!

@adamscochran - Adam Cochran (adamscochran.eth)

1/17 The *dangerous* mistake that mainstream journalists make on the Tyler Robinson case, is the same mistake that Chuck Schumer makes in Congress: -They assume that the Trump admin is "politics as usual" But this is not normal. They lie to us DAILY! https://t.co/8d9CbIY1ec

@adamscochran - Adam Cochran (adamscochran.eth)

1/5 WOW! According to reporting by the New York Times: The suspicious text messages between Tyler Robinson and his partner were *REPRODUCED* for the charging document. Raising even more questions about their authenticity!

@adamscochran - Adam Cochran (adamscochran.eth)

@d3fmetal https://t.co/Ja55sryCel

@adamscochran - Adam Cochran (adamscochran.eth)

So let’s be clear, I am not saying they are fully fakes. What I think is likely is: -they had a text convo -they deleted that convo -the roommate/boyfriend was interrogated -he recounted the contents of that conversation under interrogation -the FBI reconstructed texts and asked “is this what it said” and he gave some general agreement -they gave that to prosecutors -prosecutors put it in charging doc without expressly saying how it was obtained -When trial finally happens, it will be so long after it happened that both parties will struggle to remember exact phrasing and prosecution won’t present these as word for word, but claim “didn’t you say this was basically the content/meaning of the texts?” And try and bully them into accepting that these paraphrased words were “within the spirit of” what they said. That’s dangerous because even if this is roughly what they said or recounted, specific word choice has huge impact on a jury.

@adamscochran - Adam Cochran (adamscochran.eth)

Yeah the “aggressive interrogation posture” quote is correct. But then they claim in the doc they claim it was reconstructed from a picture. At this point, my hunch is that they’ve interrogated the boyfriend and paraphrased his statements to recreate texts, and are omitting that fact to let people assume these texts are word-for-word

@adamscochran - Adam Cochran (adamscochran.eth)

@AvroArrowflys Fully dead? Not likely - unless these texts were full forgeries. But Kash’s public statements and biases have deeply jeopardized the case. It’s likely his sentencing will be light, and there is a small (but non-zero) chance of a mistrial!

@adamscochran - Adam Cochran (adamscochran.eth)

@SciOperative Incredibly so. Even from the charging doc, we know Patel was making claims about investigation supporting groups, while they already supposedly had these texts, which show other parties didn’t know. That’s another reason why this sits weird.

@adamscochran - Adam Cochran (adamscochran.eth)

@MiasmicMatt Yup, my guess is:

@adamscochran - Adam Cochran (adamscochran.eth)

So let’s be clear, I am not saying they are fully fakes. What I think is likely is: -they had a text convo -they deleted that convo -the roommate/boyfriend was interrogated -he recounted the contents of that conversation under interrogation -the FBI reconstructed texts and asked “is this what it said” and he gave some general agreement -they gave that to prosecutors -prosecutors put it in charging doc without expressly saying how it was obtained -When trial finally happens, it will be so long after it happened that both parties will struggle to remember exact phrasing and prosecution won’t present these as word for word, but claim “didn’t you say this was basically the content/meaning of the texts?” And try and bully them into accepting that these paraphrased words were “within the spirit of” what they said. That’s dangerous because even if this is roughly what they said or recounted, specific word choice has huge impact on a jury.

@adamscochran - Adam Cochran (adamscochran.eth)

@ReddogOHIO It depends on how they were gathered and how they are expressly presented. That gives room for defense to contest them, but, it’s likely not illegal how they’ve been put forward here. This is what I suspect:

@adamscochran - Adam Cochran (adamscochran.eth)

So let’s be clear, I am not saying they are fully fakes. What I think is likely is: -they had a text convo -they deleted that convo -the roommate/boyfriend was interrogated -he recounted the contents of that conversation under interrogation -the FBI reconstructed texts and asked “is this what it said” and he gave some general agreement -they gave that to prosecutors -prosecutors put it in charging doc without expressly saying how it was obtained -When trial finally happens, it will be so long after it happened that both parties will struggle to remember exact phrasing and prosecution won’t present these as word for word, but claim “didn’t you say this was basically the content/meaning of the texts?” And try and bully them into accepting that these paraphrased words were “within the spirit of” what they said. That’s dangerous because even if this is roughly what they said or recounted, specific word choice has huge impact on a jury.

@adamscochran - Adam Cochran (adamscochran.eth)

@MaryMil62180561 Yeah he said the contents of a written note were determined by “aggressive interrogation posture” They didn’t say that about the texts. But then their story changed up to say they got the content of the note from a picture of the note. So it’s all very suspect.

@adamscochran - Adam Cochran (adamscochran.eth)

@_Sweet_Lew Yeah for the past few days my theory has been reconstructed from coerced testimony. (Which people complained was outlandish to claim, and now we see is right) Here’s how I suspect it happened and how they’ll use it:

@adamscochran - Adam Cochran (adamscochran.eth)

So let’s be clear, I am not saying they are fully fakes. What I think is likely is: -they had a text convo -they deleted that convo -the roommate/boyfriend was interrogated -he recounted the contents of that conversation under interrogation -the FBI reconstructed texts and asked “is this what it said” and he gave some general agreement -they gave that to prosecutors -prosecutors put it in charging doc without expressly saying how it was obtained -When trial finally happens, it will be so long after it happened that both parties will struggle to remember exact phrasing and prosecution won’t present these as word for word, but claim “didn’t you say this was basically the content/meaning of the texts?” And try and bully them into accepting that these paraphrased words were “within the spirit of” what they said. That’s dangerous because even if this is roughly what they said or recounted, specific word choice has huge impact on a jury.

@adamscochran - Adam Cochran (adamscochran.eth)

So look while he has the presumption of innocence, there is evidence against him here. Jumping to something like paid actor is an extraordinary claim that would require extraordinary evidence to be valid to entertain. I think it’s likely that he did it, but the case has been sloppy and that the FBI tried to embellish the facts to fit a political narrative instead of just pursue conviction. So I think it’s important we don’t jump to grand conspiracy, but instead view this through the lens of incompetent and bias investigators.

@adamscochran - Adam Cochran (adamscochran.eth)

So let’s be clear, I am not saying they are fully fakes. What I think is likely is: -they had a text convo -they deleted that convo -the roommate/boyfriend was interrogated -he recounted the contents of that conversation under interrogation -the FBI reconstructed texts and asked “is this what it said” and he gave some general agreement -they gave that to prosecutors -prosecutors put it in charging doc without expressly saying how it was obtained -When trial finally happens, it will be so long after it happened that both parties will struggle to remember exact phrasing and prosecution won’t present these as word for word, but claim “didn’t you say this was basically the content/meaning of the texts?” And try and bully them into accepting that these paraphrased words were “within the spirit of” what they said. That’s dangerous because even if this is roughly what they said or recounted, specific word choice has huge impact on a jury.

@adamscochran - Adam Cochran (adamscochran.eth)

@BizarroTrump10 Nonsense. There are absolutely valid ways for them to have and use reconstructions. That doesn’t mean the prosecutor didn’t do their job. But it does mean the public needs clarification, because of how this evidence is used in shaping a political narrative.

@adamscochran - Adam Cochran (adamscochran.eth)

So let’s be clear, I am not saying they are fully fakes. What I think is likely is: -they had a text convo -they deleted that convo -the roommate/boyfriend was interrogated -he recounted the contents of that conversation under interrogation -the FBI reconstructed texts and asked “is this what it said” and he gave some general agreement -they gave that to prosecutors -prosecutors put it in charging doc without expressly saying how it was obtained -When trial finally happens, it will be so long after it happened that both parties will struggle to remember exact phrasing and prosecution won’t present these as word for word, but claim “didn’t you say this was basically the content/meaning of the texts?” And try and bully them into accepting that these paraphrased words were “within the spirit of” what they said. That’s dangerous because even if this is roughly what they said or recounted, specific word choice has huge impact on a jury.

@adamscochran - Adam Cochran (adamscochran.eth)

So let’s be clear, I am not saying they are fully fakes. What I think is likely is: -they had a text convo -they deleted that convo -the roommate/boyfriend was interrogated -he recounted the contents of that conversation under interrogation -the FBI reconstructed texts and asked “is this what it said” and he gave some general agreement -they gave that to prosecutors -prosecutors put it in charging doc without expressly saying how it was obtained -When trial finally happens, it will be so long after it happened that both parties will struggle to remember exact phrasing and prosecution won’t present these as word for word, but claim “didn’t you say this was basically the content/meaning of the texts?” And try and bully them into accepting that these paraphrased words were “within the spirit of” what they said. That’s dangerous because even if this is roughly what they said or recounted, specific word choice has huge impact on a jury.

RealGeorgeWebb1
Posted - September 28, 2025 at 9:24 PM
Saved - September 29, 2025 at 7:50 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I recently discovered that Tyler Robinson's Dairy Queen was closed abruptly on September 25th, with witnesses confirming it was done in a hurry. I chose a different Dairy Queen location closer to the airport to avoid scrutiny from cameras, as I believe this route would be less monitored. I urged Cash Patel to check the cameras from both locations to trace the escape route. Meanwhile, things seem to be disappearing quickly ahead of Tyler's court appearance. I filmed both Dairy Queen locations and shared the footage for clarity.

@RealGeorgeWebb1 - George Webb - Investigative Journalist

You will never guess what happened to Tyler Robinson's Dairy Queen. https://t.co/tRBnlsR9he

Video Transcript AI Summary
Well, we're at 1545. 1545. Is that a Dairy Queen sign? Interestingly enough, it is looks like it's been totally taken apart. Got cleaning mop buckets everywhere and so forth. And it's right across, by the way, from Brigham Young University, right across from the stadium. Right? So my point is there's the football stadium. There's cameras all over here. The FBI should be able to easily say what the path was for Robinson to get to the airport or the judge challenger. Should be flock hammers all along here.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, we're at 1545. 1545. Is that a Dairy Queen sign? Interestingly enough, it is looks like it's been totally taken apart. Got cleaning mop buckets everywhere and so forth. And it's right across, by the way, from Brigham Young University, right across from the stadium. Right? So my point is there's the football stadium. There's cameras all over here. The FBI should be able to easily say what the path was for Robinson to get to the airport or the judge challenger. Should be flock hammers all along here.

@RealGeorgeWebb1 - George Webb - Investigative Journalist

I have three witnesses that we just talked to at the apartments next door who said the DQ was closed down three days ago in a hurry. Recipe books still outside. Closed September 25th closed.

@RealGeorgeWebb1 - George Webb - Investigative Journalist

I want to give everyone an idea of why I went to the other location. If the team making their escape, wanted the FBI to pull the cameras along route 89 they would give the Candace location to Candace. I therefore chose the opposite Dairy Queen that was closer to the airport because that would be the route that would not have scrutiny with cameras. If cash Patel pulls all of the cameras along university Avenue he'll find the vehicle that took Tyler Robinson to the airport I believe. What criminal would tell you their escape route so that their escape route could be resolved with later pulling of the cameras along the escape route. That makes no sense.

@RealGeorgeWebb1 - George Webb - Investigative Journalist

wanted to ensure that cash Patel would pull the cameras from both Dairy Queen's to the airport so I chose the opposite Dairy Queen that Candace initially focused on. From Candice's disclosure the route 89 route to the airport would've been pulled for camera locations. By me adding the route by the BYU stadium that would tell cash to pull the cameras on the university Avenue route so that both routes of escape would be covered.

@RealGeorgeWebb1 - George Webb - Investigative Journalist

Things are getting erased fast before Tyler appears in Court today.

@RealGeorgeWebb1 - George Webb - Investigative Journalist

This is another way to the Provo Airport where you don't hit any cameras. But you need a practice field to take off from. https://t.co/flzzdJtbU8

@RealGeorgeWebb1 - George Webb - Investigative Journalist

@MrJFerrous you're mistaken. We interviewed three people that said they ate their three days ago. The recipe book is still in the back of the DQ the trash hasn't been picked up until tomorrow. But you follow Ryan and so that makes a lot of sense.

@RealGeorgeWebb1 - George Webb - Investigative Journalist

@Sidekick1975 yes, closing the DQ across the street from the Brigham Young football stadium just as football season starting makes total sense to me.

@RealGeorgeWebb1 - George Webb - Investigative Journalist

@PAIUTEzero23 I made videos at both locations and I pin the other location to the top of my profile if you would just look. You are the pathetic one in this case for not looking.

@RealGeorgeWebb1 - George Webb - Investigative Journalist

@HouseCracka Thank you!!

@RealGeorgeWebb1 - George Webb - Investigative Journalist

@DebraHairy We had three different citizen journalists go and film the Superman Blizard movie poster behind him.

@RealGeorgeWebb1 - George Webb - Investigative Journalist

@Kalvin_McClain No.

@RealGeorgeWebb1 - George Webb - Investigative Journalist

@Sunni_in_SoCal @RealCandaceO we're gonna film the one in Orem too.

@RealGeorgeWebb1 - George Webb - Investigative Journalist

@GGxTrades I film both locations and I put the other location at the top of my profile. This was the one they were tearing down a break neck speed so I thought it was worthy of note.

@RealGeorgeWebb1 - George Webb - Investigative Journalist

@InThis2getherWW I film both locations and put the other one at the top of my profile.

@RealGeorgeWebb1 - George Webb - Investigative Journalist

@teasterwood7 I went to both Einstein. LOL

@RealGeorgeWebb1 - George Webb - Investigative Journalist

@Trillion0x we went to both locations and I pinned the other location to my Twitter feed. But that's not the one that they were tearing down at breakneck speed so I thought I would provide that film to everyone as well.

@RealGeorgeWebb1 - George Webb - Investigative Journalist

@MissKatyAllison @RealCandaceO Not my trash!!

@RealGeorgeWebb1 - George Webb - Investigative Journalist

@JustinWeRchange I film both locations and pin the other one to the top of my profile. This is the one that they were tearing down at break neck.speed.

@RealGeorgeWebb1 - George Webb - Investigative Journalist

@d23diggers See my last answer.

ProjectConstitu
Posted - September 30, 2025 at 9:52 AM
Saved - September 30, 2025 at 2:02 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Phil Lyman’s nephew, Shane, sparked controversy by sharing on Instagram that he retraced the shooter’s route from UVU, where the family owns significant property. In his posts, a friend of Shane's resembles the FBI's blurred image of the shooter more than the arrested suspect, Tyler Robinson, whose family claims he was never on campus. After Candace Owens reached out, Shane privatized his account, and Phil reacted defensively to inquiries. The Robinson family continues to deny Tyler's involvement, raising questions about the mystery friend and the events of that day. The search for answers continues.

@ProjectConstitu - Project Constitution

🚨BREAKING: Did Phil Lyman’s Nephew Just EXPOSE the REAL Shooter? HUGE RED FLAGS in the Charlie Kirk shooting investigation Phil Lyman’s nephew Shane went on IG bragging about “walking in the shooter’s shoes” — retracing the exact route from UVU campus through his grandma’s neighborhood (where the shooter was allegedly caught on Ring cameras). 👉 Odd fact: The Lyman family owns a massive chunk of that neighborhood. But here’s where it gets CRAZY — in Shane’s IG pics/videos, one of his friends looks strikingly similar to the FBI’s blurred image of the shooter. Honestly? He looks more like the suspect than the man they arrested, Tyler Robinson. And Robinson’s family insists Tyler has never even stepped foot on UVU campus. So what happens when Candace Owens reaches out? Shane immediately privatizes his Instagram and ghosts. Phil Lyman leaves her on read, then lashes out at a mutual acquaintance for even asking questions. If they’re innocent, why panic? Why hide? Why attack people asking for clarity? Meanwhile, the family of Robinson continues to say the FBI photo is NOT him. And the question nobody’s answering: how would Tyler Robinson know the exact rooftop vantage points on UVU’s campus? The public deserves answers. Who is Shane’s mystery friend? Where was he that day? Why is everyone suddenly clamming up? If you know anything about the friend in Shane’s posts, or were in that neighborhood on the day of the shooting — reach out TO ME OR @RealCandaceO . This story is far from over.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The family says that the photo of the young man coming up the stairs, which was shared, that blurry image, is definitively not Tyler Robinson. "Face looks different." "Face looks more narrow." "That person looks taller." "Tyler Robinson also appears to have full lips." The speaker notes that Tyler has never stepped foot on UVU campus and was accepted to Utah State University, not Utah Valley, raising questions about how he could know rooftop routes to film a shot of Charlie Kirk on the Losey Center. Phil Lyman's nephew Shane posted a public tour retracing the shooter’s route, sharing photos and Converse footprints, asking who the two people in a staircase photo are. The speaker reached out to Phil and Shane; Shane made his profile private, Lyman left him on red. A public appeal for information and video uploads is made, with tips to canisowens.com.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The family says that the photo of the young man that is coming up the stairs, which was shared, that blurry image, is definitively not Tyler Robinson. And let me just say, I never thought it looked like him. Neither did you. K? Face looks different. Face looks more narrow. Also, that person looks taller. Every time I say, I'm like, this person is taller than Tyler Robinson. Tyler Robinson also appears to have full lips even though this image is blurry. We're not looking for someone that's got a that got fuller lips, and Tyler Robinson looks broader than that individual walking. Right? So I I I'm on board with that person walking up the stairs. It's not Tyler Robinson because I feel like it was intentionally blurred. They also never gave us the footage at all because in order to blur it, they probably needed a static image. In fact, according to my source, Tyler has never even stepped foot on UVU campus. Tyler, it turns out, has which has already been revealed, was accepted into Utah State University, not Utah Valley. And that's actually interesting if you pause and reflect on that because we didn't really consider how on earth Tyler became not just familiar with the layout of the campus, but familiar with the rooftop layout of UVU campus. So familiar that he knew exactly how to scale across the rooftops to duck down or in order to take an almost impossible shot at a Charlie Kirk who was sitting beneath a a tent. How did he know how to do all of that? Had he been there before? That he knew where Charlie was gonna be sitting in it, that he would have that shot from on top of the Losey Center? What? Right? I would actually and I I don't know. But I would imagine that even actual current UVU students don't know that possibility. Like, they're not even that familiar with how to scale the rooftops and what shots they can take from it. We'll see. And then Phil Lyman's nephew did this public tour saying that he was going to walk the same route that the shooter walked. Again, this was all public. I'm only looking at things publicly. And let's just look at some of these posts from nephew Shane. I mean, first and foremost, he's here he's with his friends. Said, I took my friends to my grandma's house tonight, and we retraced his steps, and we took pictures in the exact place that the security cameras caught him. I've been through this new experience for the last few days. I'm still very glad to have attended and to support Charlie Kirk and to see him. The last pic shows Converse brand footprints. And then he does hashtags, and here are him and the three friends. And by the way, I'm looking at his the front on the right, and I'm like, I don't know. I I'd like to know who that is at the very least, and I'd to know who everybody in this photo is. This is just interesting. Like, you guys are are in the staircase and posting side by sides. Like, they put these side by side photos of them in the staircase. And I just was like, I I need to just know more about you, and I need to know more about these two individuals who I couldn't find in his friends list. And they certainly hadn't liked the photo or also would have messaged them directly to figure out who they are. And, yeah, I found I found that very strange. I reached out to both Phil, and I reached out to his nephew Shane, and I asked for them to identify the guys in that photo. Like I said, I was interested, in who those individuals were because I couldn't find it on his friend list. And in response, Shane immediately takes his profile private. And Lyman, Phil Lyman, leaves me on red. I don't think Phil is acting in a way that I perceive to be stable given the fact that, again, he inserted himself in this investigation. So I am now left in the predicament where I need to just ask the public If you are one of those two kids that are in the photos there, I would love to ask you some questions since you publicized this tour. I mean, they even did the full video walking through where he walked, and, you know, he said, my uncle he even posted he posted Phil Lyman. So my uncle was with Charlie. This is the video that they posted. Everything was done publicly. And now I'm like, okay. You could maybe maybe you have something that's helpful I wanna ask you about. Could you send me that photo? Could you send me that video? Could you send me all of this stuff? And now I'm getting radio silence. So, unfortunately, because I need to figure out what happened on that day, I'm turning to the public, to try to identify those people and anything else that you may know that may help put things together for us. Again, please reserve the tips at canisowens.com for actual tips related to the questions that we are asking, not for just comments, those sorts of things, videos that you'd like me to watch or things that you like to do to point me into a different direction, please just tag us on social media.
Villgecrazylady
Posted - October 13, 2025 at 12:18 AM
Saved - October 13, 2025 at 8:24 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m puzzled by the whole storyline. Investigators photographed a phone screen instead of seizing the device, and now we’re questioning the authenticity of the messages—are they iMessages, texts, or Discord? CNN allegedly generated the image, not law enforcement. The “Tyler” texts, the roommate angle, and the consent/warrant issue raise serious doubts about what’s real and what isn’t, and whether anyone could be framed.

@Villgecrazylady - Mel

This has been bothering me for weeks. This was the biggest political assntion in decades and when investigators seemingly stumbled upon a *literal* full blown confession, with ALL the details… instead of confiscating the phone as evidence… they used their own phones to take pictures of the phone screen? WTAF??? There’s something deeply wrong here.

@Villgecrazylady - Mel

Those messages are literally crimes that Tyler is being charged with and the only proof that they exist is a picture of a phone screen? REALLY???? https://t.co/KhZovUJHl6

@Villgecrazylady - Mel

That’s just it! Tyler DID go home to his apartment with his roommate… and he then proceeded to text his roommate while at home with him https://t.co/AMoKcPMffg

@terrybythebay - Terry

@Villgecrazylady The first message uses the term "roommate" five times yet they still can't explain why Tyler didn't go "home" afterwards and instead was texting his "roommate" while living with his parents. It's a small detail. But if we can't trust the truth of something so simple....

@Villgecrazylady - Mel

Thats another thing. This image was generated by CNN, not law enforcement or the prosecutors office. We actually have no idea if these are iMessages, text messages or Discord messages. https://t.co/cpF6VHTUie

@NikiDavisNDA - NIKI DAVIS

@Villgecrazylady @RealCandaceO Looks like a MacBook screenshot to me. If real at all.

@Villgecrazylady - Mel

YES! That’s something else that’s been driving me crazy! And this series of events is repeated in both the booking sheet (👇) and the probable cause affidavit (👆) (Not that I think the roommate would frame a rando, but it’s certainly possible he set Tyler up to take the whole fall)

@IsraeliLobby - United States of Israel

@Villgecrazylady Wait. They’re basing it off the fact that the contact name was “Tyler” — like didn’t even check the number ?? Verify , confirm identity?? The roommate could have framed anyone??

@Villgecrazylady - Mel

@Terri_Woodall False. “Police can search and collect evidence if the person with a reasonable expectation of privacy freely and voluntarily gives permission.” Obviously consent was gained. No warrant was needed. If you want to be a smart ass, you should work harder on the smart part👍🏻

@Villgecrazylady - Mel

@DoritsCig1 @RealCandaceO Right?! NO ONE says “exchange”

bringbacklogic_
Posted - October 13, 2025 at 4:50 AM
Saved - October 23, 2025 at 2:08 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’ve reviewed the thread, the official charging documents, and the prosecutor’s statements about Tyler Robinson, plus a long series of claims about Charlie Kirk. I summarize: the texts are unlikely fake; autopsy was performed; the .30-06 wound could lack an exit wound under certain conditions; multiple debunked claims include exploding lapel mics, back-shot vs front-shot, and foreign-op involvement. The thread argues for evidence-based conclusions and cautions against hype or framing innocents.

@bringbacklogic_ - Make America Logical Again

THREAD: Fact-checking Claims Surrounding Charlie Kirk’s Death “Just asking questions” is not the same as asking loaded questions that wreck innocent people’s lives. It’s no longer about uncovering truth, it’s about DENYING it to push a narrative. And when controversy becomes currency, villains are invented, chaos is sold, and the truth pays the price. Questions ARE healthy. Paranoia isn’t. Let’s get back to asking SMART questions — the kind that seek truth, not destroy it. Because truth still matters.

@bringbacklogic_ - Make America Logical Again

First, it's important to establish that these are the official charging documents filed in the arrest of Tyler Robinson, not some "viral PDF." You can view them here: https://atty.utahcounty.gov/cms/uploads/TJR_Information_49872215e3.pdf https://t.co/qDAfGHPRSV

@bringbacklogic_ - Make America Logical Again

Next, here is the video of the prosecutor outlining the charges against Tyler Robinson. Though these are ALLEGATIONS pending a jury trial, he states: - Tyler turned himself in after a family intervention where he claimed he wanted to end his life instead of going to jail - Used a bolt-action .30-06 rifle, originally gifted by grandfather - Was in a romantic relationship with his roommate, a biological male transitioning genders - Mother alleged that he had become left-leaning in recent years, pro-gay and trans rights, and critical of Kirk's "hate" - Engaged in witness tampering by instructing roommate to delete incriminating texts and not speak to police - Surveillance footage showed him walking with an unusual gait, consistent with hiding a rifle in his pants leg - Police found spent cartridge casings at his residence with similar etchings to those on the rifle's ammunition - Police recovered the alleged murder weapon hidden, wrapped in a towel, with DNA evidence linking it to him https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hFOCgrEpGxQ

@bringbacklogic_ - Make America Logical Again

False Claim #1: Tyler Robinson's texts are fake Reality: Claims that these texts are “fake” are extremely unlikely, as they were verified for inclusion in the official charging documents. If falsified (e.g., planted or staged), Tyler’s defense attorney could simply present counter-forensic evidence, such as communication records, metadata etc. to disprove their authenticity, potentially leading to a mistrial on the grounds of fraudulent or improperly obtained evidence. Though there is still time to do this, it has already been a month with no motion to dismiss. It’s reasonable to assume that the texts are from Tyler’s phone because no counter-evidence can be presented. (Still remains plausible though to question whether Tyler orchestrated the text messages to avoid implicating others who may have been involved.)

@bringbacklogic_ - Make America Logical Again

The message included in the charging documents show: - Direct confession by Tyler Robinson -His motive - Confirmation he was at the scene of the crime - Plan to escape with the gun, removing all evidence - That the gun was his grandfather's - The towel seen in the video of him dropping off the roof with his DNA on it - Engraving of the bullets seemingly before that info was publicly available - That his father suspected him from seeing the gun on TV -Confirmation that the deputy neighbor was with him when he turned himself in - Telling his lover to not talk to the media Ashton Forbes breaks this down here: https://t.co/FkbKDWrdAq

@bringbacklogic_ - Make America Logical Again

False Claim #2: “The texts were obviously written by an FBI agent because NO ONE talks like that” Reality: Someone who decides to murder someone has already proven they don’t think or act normal. You can’t use sensible logic to judge irrational behavior. Secondly, it’s far more plausible that Tyler scripted them in an attempt to absolve his roommate (and maybe others) than for the FBI to have planted them on his phone. Framing him would require hacking or physically accessing Robinson’s phone, bypassing encryption, and ensuring the messages blend with his communication patterns and timestamps. Again, Tyler's defense attorney could file a motion for dismissal if this were the case, but they haven't. However, the way they read is extremely detailed, as if to cover all bases. It’s actually the same playbook Walter White used in Breaking Bad and there are many real-world cases of people fabricating alibis via texts or emails.

@bringbacklogic_ - Make America Logical Again

False Claim #3: "It's IMPOSSIBLE that a .30-60 wouldn't have an exit wound on a human. You’re pushing a magic bullet theory” Reality: Though admittedly rare, it IS possible under the right conditions. Documented medical cases, marines, hunters, gun experts, ChatGPT, Grok etc. all confirm that it CAN be stopped, deflected, or fragment when it hits vertebrae.

@bringbacklogic_ - Make America Logical Again

Documented medical cases with no exit wound 👇 https://t.co/b5HlRuHpFv

@bringbacklogic_ - Make America Logical Again

Marine confirming it’s possible 👇

@TigTiegen - John “TIG” Tiegen

People keep arguing over what really happened to Charlie Kirk. I get it. Nobody trusts much anymore. Not the government. Not the media. Not influencers. But somewhere in all the noise, the facts are still there. Charlie was hit once. Right side of the neck. The shot came from above and to his right, around four hundred feet out. That is not rumor. That is what the forensics say. The bullet did not exit. People say that is impossible for a thirty aught six. It is not. Bone, angle, and energy loss can stop even a rifle round cold. It is rare, but it is real. Military wound labs, FBI files, and medical journals have all recorded it before. This was not a magic bullet. It was bad geometry. When you shoot downward from elevation, the bullet travels on a steeper path than your crosshairs. If you do not know that offset, your round hits higher than you think. That is how a man aiming at the chest ends up hitting the neck. He probably was not trained. He just did not understand the angle. Now here is what most people miss. The round entered on the right side and stopped just under the skin on the left. That kind of energy dumps everything inside the body. The pressure wave and shattered bone force the blood and tissue to blow out through the weak side. It is violent. It looks like an exit but it is not. The bullet still sliced through layers of skin as it slowed, leaving a ragged tear. That is why the left side exploded with blood even though the bullet never left his body. This would explain why the left side blew out the way it did. You do not have to be a doctor or see the autopsy report to understand that kind of force. You just have to know basic physics and what high velocity rounds do inside the body. That is a real explanation, not some alien theory or secret agent storyline. Now about all these cover up claims. I have heard them all. Government. Feds. Foreign ties. Could they lie. Sure. They have done it before. But ask yourself why they would here. What is the gain. If there was a bigger secret, you would see missing evidence, conflicting reports, or sealed files that do not make sense. None of that has happened. Could they be protecting themselves from embarrassment over security failures. Maybe. But that is not the same as rewriting what happened. This is not about taking the government’s side. It is about sticking to what can be proven. Skepticism is healthy. Blind faith is not. And neither is blind outrage. If someone says they have new information, tell them to show it. Evidence has timestamps, trajectories, and autopsy reports. Not whispers or secondhand clips. Truth does not need hype. It just needs receipts. Tig Hashtags: #TruthHasEvidence #FactsOverFear #ModernPatriotPodcast #BallisticsDontLie #AlwaysMoveForward

@bringbacklogic_ - Make America Logical Again

Gun expert confirming its possible, though admittedly rare 👇 https://t.co/RbYGrr1wLd

@Mrgunsngear - Mrgunsngear

Is the "official story" that Charlie Kirk was shot in the neck by a 30-06 from ~130 yards away but didn't have an exit would even possible? Let's discuss... #CharlieKirk https://t.co/vpk9Yklp2i

Video Transcript AI Summary
The video discusses the shooting of Charlie and examines the official narrative. The host notes that the official story is a sniper on a roof at roughly 130–140 yards, using a 30-06 bolt-action rifle, with ammunition that impacted Charlie’s neck and left no exit wound. He mentions that conservative media outlets have asked him whether this is plausible, and that Alex Jones reported TP USA sources claiming the bullet entered Charlie’s back at a downward angle and stayed there. Key points about the 30-06 are explained for context. The caliber was the US military standard in World War I and II, making it an older design. A comparison is shown with a 5.56 and a 0.308 projectile to illustrate size: the 30-06 bullet appears large, but ballistically it is very similar to the 0.308 due to powder improvements over time. The host emphasizes that many people now have experience with 0.308, so his discussion centers on terminal performance in soft tissue rather than cartridge shape alone. Several ballistic factors are highlighted. Bullets for 30-06 in 2025 vary widely in weight, typically 150–180 grains, with some as light as 110 grains and up to 200+ grains. Lighter, longer bullets can have higher ballistic coefficients, meaning they travel through air with less resistance and are very stable in flight, but they destabilize more quickly in soft tissue. He notes that higher ballistic coefficient projectiles may behave differently upon impact, potentially increasing the likelihood of atypical behavior upon penetrating flesh. However, the exact projectile type (full metal jacket, open-tip match, soft point, etc.) is unknown, and the FBI has released no information about the actual projectile. Regarding the probability of the reported scenario (a downward-angle hit with a 30-06 leaving no exit wound), the host estimates the odds as very small but not impossible. He provides a rough quantified sense: if this scenario happened a thousand times under the same conditions, it might occur one or two times. He stresses that it’s very unlikely that such a powerful round would leave no exit wound, but not impossible. He notes he has seen angles from different views suggesting no exit wound. He proposes that if the FBI and law enforcement want public confidence in the story, more information should be released. For example, if the bullet stayed in the upper torso, one would expect to see a temporary cavity forming as the bullet penetrates, and such cavitation would be evident in an autopsy; no autopsy details have been released in his view. He reiterates that the official account is highly improbable based on his experience with ballistics, armor, gel, and animals, but not proven impossible. The host invites questions in the comments and on his social media, asks viewers to say a prayer for Charlie and his family, and closes the video.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Welcome back everyone. Today we're making a video that I wish I wasn't making because I wish the events that we're gonna discuss here never unfolded. But unfortunately, as of course all of you know, Charlie was killed and the official narrative anyway, which there are a lot of holes in the official narrative, is that there was a man shooting from roughly a 130 to a 140 yards away from elevated position with a 30 aught six chambered bolt action rifle with a relatively long barrel. We'll get to that here in just a little bit. And he was using 30 aught six ammunition in that it impacted Charlie's neck and there was no exit wound. So when that was announced, I believe that was announced on Saturday, don't quote me on that, I got a ton of texts from people in the industry asking what I thought about that. I would tell them, and then this morning, because obviously it's Monday as of when I'm filming this, I'm not sure when it's gonna be up. But this morning, pretty much all the conservative media agencies reached out to me one in one form or another and asked if they thought it brother, if I thought this was possible or plausible or insane or completely, you know, complete nonsense if that makes sense. During those time during the time rather from when it was announced, that there was no exit wound to when, you know, now we're making this video, Alex Jones has made a video stating, and you guys can think whatever you want about Alex Jones, but it's an interesting insight, that the gentleman from TP USA who he talked to said that, the bullet went at a down angle into, Charlie's back essentially and stayed there. So let's discuss. So first off, for that many of you guys watching this, might not be familiar with what we're talking about with a 30 out six. 30 out six is the caliber that was the primary cartridge used by the US military for both World War one and World War two, so it is a relatively old bullet design. So, for example, this is a five five six projectile, this is a three zero eight projectile, and then next to it that is a 30 aught six projectile. Now, I show you guys this, not to make it seem like this is a gigantic bullet, which it is, it's a fairly large bullet, and thirty-six is a powerful round, no doubt about it. But compared to the five fifty six, you'll see that the five fifty six, the entire projectile case, powder, everything just sits in the case of the thirty-six. Now, one thing to preface that with is that 30 aught six, again, it was designed a long time ago, they didn't have as efficient powders as we have today. So in terms of ballistics, it's very, very similar to the three zero eight. The zero eight is just a touch behind it, but they improved the powders a lot. So while this does look much larger, ballistically, they are very, very similar. So, those of you guys who have experience or know people who have experience with three zero eight, in terms of terminal performance, I e how a bullet performs in soft tissue, they're going to be extremely, extremely similar. So I just say that because a lot more people in 2025 have experience with three zero eight than they do with thirty out six. So there is that just to start out with. So a few things about the shooting that we have to take into account. Again, I'm just going to talk about the official narrative. There are a lot of other narratives, lot of other theories that I think many of them have some plausibility, but for the purposes of this video, we are just going to talk about the official narrative, sniper on the roof, 30 aught six, one hundred and thirty, 140 yards away, and the impact that we all saw. Of course, I will not be showing any of that, but if the video is horrible and but if you saw it, some of the things that are in it are relevant to today's video. So there's that. So a few things about 30.6 is that especially in 2025, there are bullet weights that are all over the place. Like this one here, I believe is a 168 grain projectile. So the grain just means how many units, if you will, of actual mass go into the bullet itself. So in '30 s six today, most of them are gonna be between 150 to 180 grains in terms of size. However, there are a huge swath in terms of actual projectiles for this caliber. So I mean, I'm sure there's weird ones out there that I'm not even thinking about, but they they go go all the way down to a 110 grains all the way up to 200 grains and over. And so, one of the reasons you go for a smaller, and this has a lot to do with bolt design, but it's going to impact what I'm about to say here in a minute. One of the things, with a lighter longer bullet that you get in terms of performance when a bullet is flying through the air, it's called ballistic coefficient. Now, not all lighter weight projectiles are gonna have a higher ballistic coefficient, but many of them will. So, what the ballistic coefficient means for people who are not shooters, I'm gonna try not to go into too many rabbit holes today, but these things are important if we wanna understand the probability of the official story that we are being told today. So, a higher ballistic coefficient bullet is going to go through the air with less resistance. That's essentially what it means. And those bullets tend to be stable, very stable actually when they're going through the air. However, when they hit soft tissue, they destabilize much more quickly and are more likely to tumble than a heavier grain projectile and that just has to do with the mass of the actual projectile, right? So, the mass of a heavier projectile is likely to keep going in the direction it was going if it is heavier. I think everyone kind of gets that if you, you know, were to throw a boulder at something, it's going to be very different in terms of when it impacts a material than if you were to throw a small pebble at it. Right? Well, same thing is true here for the bullet weight. So, that is something to consider and as of right now, the FBI has released zero information at all about the actual projectile used. So, going back to what I earlier said earlier, the most common of the cartridges or the bullets that are used in 30 ought six rather are between a 150 to 180 grade. So keep that in mind. So with all that said, if you were to just ask me what are the odds of a 30 oz six projectile being shot at a downward angle, I think the angle from what I've seen online is anywhere from eight to 12 degrees, being shot at a downward angle, hitting someone in the neck, going into their chest cavity is. I would say it's very small, extremely small, but not impossible. I realize many of you guys, I'm slow to this video, was kind of on the edge as to whether or not I wanted to make it. But many of you guys have watched other people's videos where they're saying it's impossible. I get that, but weird things can happen with bullets when they get into soft tissue. Many of you guys have shot a lot of fleshy things. I have as well, particularly with three zero eight. I've shot a lot of things with three zero eight over the years and every now and then you see a bullet go in and exit somewhere at like a 90 degree angle or something like that. Those things absolutely do happen and if you were just to ask me how probable is it that this story happened the way it's being reported by the FBI as well as the folks at TPUSA, I would say it is very low but not impossible. So just to put a number on it, right? So if this type of scenario happened a thousand times, right, all the same factors that we're talking about, the angle, flesh, neck, etcetera. If all these things happen a thousand times, I would expect to see a result like this maybe one or two times, possibly, maybe. It's very unlikely that a bullet of with the power of 30 out six, which is a very powerful round, would not blow completely through and leave an exit wound. It's not impossible though. That is what I'm saying. Additionally, what I am saying is that I have seen the angles, I'm sure many of you guys have as well, from both the left side as well as behind Charlie a little bit, and you definitely don't see an exit wound. So, believe that whatever he was shot with, there was no exit wound. I do have some questions that I want to get to about that here in just a second based on a couple videos I have seen. The chances of this happening, the way they're saying it happened, in my opinion, based on years of shooting armor, gel, animals, all types of things that you guys have seen here on the channel, they go up if it was a higher ballistic coefficient bullet. Again, going back to what I was outlining earlier, those are very stable in the air. However, when they hit soft fleshy material, they destabilize much more quickly than heavier, low ballistic coefficient projectiles. So, if it was like some sort of odd copper round or something like that, it is much more likely I would give it a number like 10 in a thousand, something like that. Still extremely unlikely, I want to be very very clear on this. What they're saying happened is extremely unlikely. It's not impossible. And the odds go up if it was a higher ballistic coefficient projectile. Again, don't even know what type of projectile it was. We don't know if it was full metal jacket. We don't know if it was a open tip match. We don't know if it was a soft point. All of those other factors would also have to be factored into what I'm saying, but we don't know any of those variables rather so I can't say it. Then if you were to tell me that it was like a 180 grain projectile foam metal jacket let's say, I would tell you that it's about as low as possible. So I don't know, one in fifty thousand chance that that could happen, right? So the odds change, right, based on the input that is happening. However, in all cases, it is very unlikely that what we are being told happened actually happened. And the only way I can really think of in terms of if the FBI and other law enforcement agencies actually want the American people to be confident in the story we're being told is to release more information. So for example, if this happened and the bullet actually stayed in Charlie's upper torso, what you'd expect to see on video, and again I haven't seen it yet, what you would expect to see is when the bullet impacts him, if it was deflected down into his chest cavity, you would expect to see the chest cavity go like that. For those of you guys who watch a lot of ballistics videos, you'll know that that is called the temporary cavity, right? So, when a high power rifle round like a point zero -six impacts fleshy material, it goes through and it's going through so fast that fleshy material is obviously almost all water, so you can't compress water. And so, because of that, the bullets going through so fast, the water material, the flesh material can't expand as fast as the bullet is going through. So, it kind of pushes everything out with some violence away from the bullet path, if that makes sense. So you typically will see something like that happen. Now, I've seen two pretty good high definition videos of this. I haven't observed that behavior at all in Charlie's torso, however. I have no idea what the frame rate those videos are at. So again, I can't say definitively, but I would would say that if it was a 30 out six and it was contained within his chest cavity, I would expect to see that happen within his chest. For a brief moment in time, we don't see that. However, even with that, if that did happen and there was what is called the temporary cavity, temporary stretch cavity some people call it, as well as you'll have the permanent cavity, which is what is actually crushed and crushed rather and destroyed by the path of the bullet, that would be very easily seen in an autopsy, right? So, the autopsy has not been released that I have seen and, if the story that we are being told happened as it is be as it is claimed anyway, that kind of cavitation and damage would be very apparent based on what happens with any type of thirty-six. I mean, again, are very powerful rounds for sure. A lot of people will say that the AR 15 shoots an extremely powerful round. Well, again, not even close. The 30 at six is a hammer and, what we're being told again is very unlikely, just not impossible to hit the point again. So, with that, that really is my take on it. If you guys have questions or anything like that, feel free to post them down below in the comments section. Additionally, all the other, social media where I will be posting this, you can ask, post those questions over there as well. But that is my initial thoughts on the possibility that the official story, which again, there's a lot of holes in the official story, but possibility that that happened ballistically because that is kind of the area that I do know based on my experience. So that is it. Let me know what you guys think down below. Before closing the video out, just ask everyone to say a prayer for Charlie and Charlie's family and everyone around them. I can't imagine what they're going through, especially Charlie's wife. So please do that. And with that, we're gonna close the video out. Thank you all for watching. I truly appreciate it. And I look forward to seeing everybody in the next video.

@bringbacklogic_ - Make America Logical Again

Many hunters have confirmed no exit wounds are possible with .30-06👇 https://t.co/SzrWXV1buP

@bringbacklogic_ - Make America Logical Again

Grok response: https://t.co/3JC6cIt3xS

@bringbacklogic_ - Make America Logical Again

Also, MLK. The Remington .30‑06 rifle used in the assassination of Martin Luther King Jr. did not produce an exit wound — a fact confirmed by both the official autopsy and a subsequent congressional forensic review. This isn't speculation; it's documented history. If a high-powered rifle failed to cause an exit wound in one of the most scrutinized shootings in modern history, why is it so hard to believe it could happen in other cases?

@bringbacklogic_ - Make America Logical Again

At this point, it’s clearly demonstrated that it IS possible. But what’s truly fascinating is that someone who chooses to deny this reality is left asking the question: If the FBI were intentionally lying about the caliber, wouldn’t they have chosen a version of the story that didn’t invite so much scrutiny and debate? It’s far more reasonable to believe they reported that caliber because it’s what the evidence actually showed

@bringbacklogic_ - Make America Logical Again

False Claim #4: “Kirk was killed by an exploding lapel mic” Reality: A lapel mic lacks the space and power for a lethal explosion. Video footage shows the mic moving WITH the blast, not causing it, disproving the claim. Here is Nate Cornacchia, retired green beret (who even doubts the FBI narrative) but debunks this specific claim 👇 https://youtu.be/TCF6UJKVKFc?si=wIgPG4i05ljxMhf5

@bringbacklogic_ - Make America Logical Again

False Claim #5: “Kirk was shot from the back, not the front” Reality: Even Candace has shifted to the official FBI narrative that Kirk was shot from the front. She then incorrectly states that it would be impossible with a .30-06 round👇

@bringbacklogic_ - Make America Logical Again

Though her conclusions are inaccurate, Candace Owens shifts to the FBI’s original narrative that Charlie Kirk was shot from the FRONT and that the bullet DID NOT EXIT his body. That's a start. https://t.co/L90hrg1rVw

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker asserts that Charlie Kirk was shot from the front and that the bullet did not exit his body, with at least a fragment of the bullet recovered from his neck. This is presented as the part of the story that is true and is claimed to dispel various theories. The speaker states they have fact-checked this information from multiple sources over more than a week of review. The fragment is described as being recovered “right around here,” approximately in line with Charlie Kirk’s shoulder blade, near the center of the back, in a location “almost in line with your shoulder blade.” The speaker argues this location provides a bullet trajectory: the bullet entered in the described area, was stopped there, and a fragment was pulled from the neck region along the spine’s line. A key point emphasized is that a .30-06 round was not recovered intact. The speaker asserts that there was no recovered bullet from a .30-06, stating that “They did not recover a bullet from a 30 odd six. They didn’t recover a bullet from a 30 odd six. Just didn't happen.” They contrast this with the presence of .30-06 bullets in some context, implying that while .30-06 rounds were found, no complete bullet was recovered. The speaker notes that death certificates in suicide cases typically reflect the gun and the bullet when both are known, and claims that there is not a bullet reflected on Charlie Kirk’s death certificate because a .30-06 bullet was not recovered. The speaker asserts that the information has been cross-checked with multiple sources and that it undermines other theories, reinforcing that common sense supports their account. The closing remark addresses hunters and military personnel, acknowledging agreement with their perspective: “Hunters and military men rejoice. It turns out that common sense still rules the roost. Okay? You guys were right.”
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Now I can tell you the part that he is telling the truth about is that Charlie's neck indeed did stop the bullet without question. Okay? And this is going to dispel a lot of theories that are out there, and I'm telling you this 100%. Charlie Kirk was shot from the front, and the bullet did not exit. And at least a fragment of the bullet was recovered from his neck. And I'm going to tell you exactly where it was recovered from. I have fact checked this information from multiple sources now. I've actually been sitting on this, for a little bit over a week. Right around here. So think about almost in line with your shoulder blade right in the center. Now why is that helpful? Because it gives us a bullet trajectory. Okay? Went in here where you saw that, and it was stopped and a fragment was pulled from think of right if you're just touching your spine in line, with your shoulder blade. That leads us obviously to the part that he's maybe not being forthcoming about. They did not recover a bullet from a 30 odd six. They didn't recover a bullet from a 30 odd six. Just didn't happen. Okay? They had found a 30 odd six bullets. Charlie's death certificate certainly would have reflected that. In suicide in suicide situations, that's just one example, medical examiners feel free to chime in. I've spoken to quite a few. But when the gun and the bullet are known, they are reflected onto the death certificate. Okay? There is not one reflected onto Charlie Kirk's death certificate because they did not recover a bullet from a 30 out of six. Hunters and military men rejoice. It turns out that common sense still rules the roost. Okay? You guys were right. You're absolutely right.

@bringbacklogic_ - Make America Logical Again

False Claim #6: “Kirk’s death certificate doesn’t mention a .30-06 round, which it should.” Reality: Death certificates typically do not specify the caliber of a gunshot wound, focusing instead on the cause of death. That’s why Kirk’s death certificate does not mention a caliber at all—not even a different one.

@bringbacklogic_ - Make America Logical Again

False Claim #7: “There was no autopsy completed for Kirk, which is why one hasn’t been released.” Reality: Utah law *requires* an autopsy in homicide cases and does not allow anyone, not even Erika Kirk, to request that one not be completed. It's not to prove that he died, but to prove how he died to a jury -- showing ballistics, trajectory, entry wound, bullet etc. Official reports confirm one was performed by the Utah Medical Examiner's Office, with preliminary findings (e.g., neck gunshot, no exit wound due to bone density) referenced in media. No full report is public yet (as of October 14, 2025—normal for ongoing investigations, expected in 4–6 weeks), but fact-checks and surgeon statements contradict the "no autopsy" narrative. Where did this belief come from? A viral (unverified) dispatch audio clip, claimed "no autopsy was performed" before Charlie Kirk's death certificate was issued. In the ~30-second audio (allegedly from Utah emergency dispatch), a voice states: "He did not go in for an autopsy, the death certificate was signed by the doctor at the hospital." However, the viral clip likely refers to the initial hospital pronouncement (where a doctor can sign a preliminary death certificate for natural/sudden deaths), but in homicides, the certificate is amended post-autopsy. Experts like Lauren the mortician notes it's a common mix-up in rushed reporting. She also alleges that she specifically CONFIRMED with her own source that one was completed, watch here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nsS1V4jvcFM

@bringbacklogic_ - Make America Logical Again

False Claim #8: "Kirk's hands in casket looked like a mannequin, it's so fake" Lauren the mortician confirms that his hands look completely normal for *deceased* hands. Waxy, flat color, stiffness, etc. is embalming 101. It appears waxy because the body’s natural fluids are replaced with preservative chemicals like formaldehyde, which harden the tissues. This process halts decomposition and removes moisture, giving the skin a smooth, wax-like appearance. The stiffness comes from protein cross-linking caused by the embalming fluid, which essentially “sets” the muscles in place.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: I'm struggling to believe that these hands on the open casket of the live performance of Charlie Kirk—who was allegedly murdered—are real. I asked GPT to confirm whether the hands were real. The wider shot confirms it even more clearly: the hands lying on the suit look artificial. The texture is too smooth, the color is flat and waxy, there are no veins, pores, or natural warmth. The positioning is stiff and mannequin-like, not how a relaxed human hand would rest. The hand with pink nails is clearly real. To confirm, the hands on the body in the suit aren’t real; they look like wax or a mannequin or some sort of prop. After I sent this message, I got a notification. I hadn’t been on ChatGPT for ages; the first time I started diving back in, it came up saying that it looks like my server responded with the wrong SSL. Speaker 1: Oh my god. He actually asked ChatGPT if the hands were real, not if they were deceased, just are they real? And then acted like he solved the crime novel when the AI said no, they’re waxy. Congrats—you outsmarted a robot with a bad riddle. But here’s the hilarious part: everything ChatGPT listed as proof they were fake—waxy texture, flat color, stiffness, and the way the hands are positioned—is literally embalming 101. You accidentally read off my mortuary science textbook, so thanks for the assist, buddy. Bruh. All of this conspiracy energy makes me realize how little people actually know about death care. Speaker 2: Very next day. They didn’t even have time to refrigerate him and perform an autopsy. I mean, obviously we saw what happened. We saw what happened. Thank god I have not seen it; I don’t want to see that. But I can assure you that that is not a person. That is not real. For it to get to this level, it’s going to have to have been at least a week. I remember, but I’ve never worked in a funeral home. If there’s a debate, I don’t want to start it, because if you don’t see it, I can’t help the blind, you know what I’m saying? Speaker 1: And then there’s her; she literally says she’s never worked at a funeral home and then launches into a whole CSI monologue. Like, no. Have you worked in a funeral home? Again, no. Then why are you out here diagnosing embalmed?
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I am still having a struggling time believing that these hands right here on the open casket of the live performance of the beloved Charlie Kirk who was maliciously murdered the other day are actually real. So I've had to ask GPT. Now I rarely use chat GPT, but what happened after this question was very weird. But anyway, we asked, so to confirm these hands aren't real and send the images of the hands, and it said, yeah. Looking at this wider shot confirms it even more clearly. The hands lying on the suit look artificial. The texture is too smooth. The color is flat and waxy. There are no veins, pores, or natural warmth. The positioning is also stiff and mannequin like and how a not how a relaxed human hand would naturally rest. The hand with pink nails is clearly real bloody bloody blah. So to confirm, the hands on the body in the suit aren't real. They look like wax or mannequin or some sort of prop. Now let me show you what happened after I sent this message. I got this notification. Now I haven't been on ChatGPT for ages. The first time I start diving into this, it's literally came up saying that it looks like my server responded with the wrong SSL. Speaker 1: Oh my god. He actually asked ChatGPT if the hands were real, not if they were deceased hands. Just are they real? And then acted like he solved the crime novel when the AI said, no. They're waxy. Congrats. You outsmarted a robot with a bad riddle. But here's the hilarious part. Everything chat GPT listed as proof they were fake, waxy texture, flat color, stiffness, positioned hands is literally embalming one zero one. You accidentally read off my mortuary science textbook, so thanks for the assist, buddy. Bruh. All of this conspiracy energy makes me realize how little people actually know about death care. Speaker 2: Very next day. So they didn't even have time to refrigerate him and bomb him. Like, he got no autopsy done. Like, I mean, obviously, we saw what happened. Right? We saw what happened. I mean, thank god I have not seen it. I don't wanna see that. But I can assure you that that is not a person. That is not that's not real. That's not real. For it to get to this level, it's gonna have to have been at least a week. Okay? I I remember I know. But I mean, I've never worked in a funeral home. Okay? If there's a I don't even wanna start this debate because because if you don't see it, I can't help those I cannot help the blind. You know what I'm saying? Speaker 1: And then we've got her. She literally says, I've never worked at a funeral home and then launches into a whole CSI monologue. Like, no. Have you worked in a funeral home? Again, no. Then why are you out here diagnosing embalmed?

@bringbacklogic_ - Make America Logical Again

Part 2: https://t.co/ZXz8vzhsOz

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker addresses several common claims about the deceased, providing corrected explanations based on mortuary practice. They state that the body was embalmed, which is why the hands appear waxy; embalming firms the tissues, removes circulation, and creates a smooth, waxy look, after which cosmetics are applied to restore color. In this case, the embalmer apparently was attempting to cover bruising, rather than color-correct, resulting in a heavy, dark, and incorrect shade that makes the hands read as unnatural or mannequin-like to nonexperts. The speaker emphasizes that the appearance is due to embalming and cosmetics, not refrigeration, a week-long delay, or Hollywood special effects. Regarding autopsies, the speaker asserts that high-profile homicide equals automatic autopsy, a standard procedure that applies regardless of who the person is. They argue that the body was autopsied immediately and embalmed immediately, and that all of this can occur within a twenty-four hour window when involved parties include the family, law enforcement, and, in this case, the vice president, implying funeral homes can move quickly when necessary. On the matter of whether the body could have had time to deteriorate or be left unrefrigerated, the speaker rejects the notion, reiterating that the process involved was rapid autopsy and embalming, not a delayed or neglected handling. When addressing the appearance of the hands, the speaker explains that what is seen is not a wax dummy but embalming with cosmetics. The embalmer’s goal was to cover bruising, but the cosmetic work was done poorly—too heavy, too dark, and the wrong shade—leading to the perception of aging or an unnatural look. The speaker also tackles a question about a missing indent where a wedding ring would be. They explain that men’s rings often sit differently than women’s; rings slide over larger knuckles and may not leave a deep indent. They note that the groove may not be permanent, and point out that watching videos of him shows him handling his rings, suggesting the indentation isn’t definitive. Furthermore, embalming changes the appearance by firming and plumping tissues, which can smooth small lines, wrinkles, and minor indentations. The speaker gives an example of elderly individuals looking years younger after embalming because fine wrinkles fill in. In summary, the video argues that the observed waxy hands result from embalming and cosmetics, not refrigeration or negligence; autopsies are performed promptly in high-profile cases; the rapid timeline is plausible given involving parties; and ring indent explanations combine anatomy (knuckles) with embalming effects, rather than indicating a missing feature.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Like you've got a prep room in your basement. She says they didn't have time to refrigerate him. They didn't have time to embalm him. Wrong. He was embalmed. That's why the hands look waxy. That's literally the whole point of embalming. She says he didn't get an autopsy. Wrong again. High profile homicide equals automatic autopsy. That's standard procedure. Doesn't matter who you are. She says for his hands to look that weird, it had to have at least been a week. Girl, how would you even know that? Did you sneak into a funeral home on a field trip and forget to tell us? Because unless you've stood over an embalming table, you don't get to set timelines like you're the county coroner. The reality is simple. He was autopsied immediately, embalmed immediately, and, yes, all of that can happen in a twenty four hour window. When the family, law enforcement, and in this case, the vice president are involved, funeral homes move fast. Well, we definitely can when it matters. Now about those hands. What you're seeing isn't a wax dummy. It's embalming in cosmetics. Embalming firms the tissues, removes circulation, and that alone creates this smooth waxy look. Then cosmetics are applied to restore color. In this case, the embalmer clearly was trying to cover bruising, gonna give him the benefit of the doubt, instead of color correcting. They just painted over it. It's too heavy, it's too dark, and it's the wrong shade. And that's why the hands look aged, and that's why the hands look unnatural. It reads as mannequin to people who don't know what they're looking at, but to me, it's just bad cosmetics. So no, it's not about refrigeration. It's not some week old body left sitting around, And it's definitely not Hollywood special effects. It's embalming done quickly and cosmetics done poorly. The only thing fake here is the confidence of people pretending they know what happens behind closed doors in a funeral home. You don't need special effects experience to understand this. You need mortuary science, and that's why I'm here. So let them keep shouting wax figure. All I see is embalming with a bad paint job. And honestly, that's on the embalmer, not the body. So someone asked why doesn't he have an indent on his finger where his wedding ring should be? Well, let's break that down because first, men's rings usually fit different than women's. Most men have larger knuckles, so the ring slides over the knuckle and sits looser on the finger itself. That means there's not always a deep indent to begin with. And if you watch videos of him, you'll even see him playing with his rings, so it's not like that groove was permanent. Second, embalming changes everything. The fluid firms and plumps the tissues, almost like it's rehydrating the skin. It can smooth out small lines, wrinkles, even minor indents. I have had 90 year old ladies who look years younger after embalming because those fine wrinkles fill back in.

@bringbacklogic_ - Make America Logical Again

False Claim #9: "Josh Hammer was NOT referencing Iryna when he tweeted about public executions on 9/9 because it wasn't even trending" Reality: This claim, amplified by Candace Owens, is easily debunked. Iryna’s case was trending on 9/9, referenced by Charlie Kirk himself and even the White House. Thousands of tweets, including discussions on the death penalty AND public executions, circulated among major conservative X accounts. Evidence follows, starting with Owens’ false claim. This is the perfect example of the importance of not hiding behind the guise of “just asking questions” when the clear intent is to frame an INNOCENT person to your audience, leading them to the false conclusion that Hammer had foreknowledge of his friend’s murder, thereby implicating him.

@bringbacklogic_ - Make America Logical Again

First, these are the tweets circulating of Josh Hammer that are being referenced by conspiracy theorists. This interpretation of foreknowledge ignores all context and reality, requiring the absurd assumption that Hammer would publicly post something implicating himself if he were involved:

@bringbacklogic_ - Make America Logical Again

Here is President Trump himself holding a briefing in the Oval Office at 10:52am that highlighted Iryna's murder by career criminal Decarlos Brown Jr. https://t.co/3LZfIyH4qM

@WhiteHouse - The White House

President Donald J. Trump denounces senseless crime in Democrat-run cities & the horrific murder of a young woman in Charlotte by a deranged criminal monster. "It's time to stop this madness. The people of our country need to insist on protection, safety, LAW & ORDER." https://t.co/eUD5KuTufC

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker criticizes Democrat governance of major cities, arguing that Democrat-run cities have allowed savage, bloodthirsty criminals to prey on innocent people. They claim radical left judges, politicians, and activists in these cities have adopted a policy of catch and release for thugs and killers. The speaker cites a specific incident in Charlotte, North Carolina, where a 23-year-old woman who came from Ukraine was murdered on a public train, presenting a photo of the victim and stating she was a beautiful young girl with a magnificent future in this country who is now dead. The killer is described as a deranged monster who was roaming free after 14 prior arrests. The speaker asserts that a depraved criminal element of violent repeat offenders is spreading destruction and death throughout the country and insists that the response must be forceful and strong, stating that “they” understand only one language: to be vicious like them. They claim that 24 of the top 25 most dangerous cities in America are run by Democrat mayors, with Chicago highlighted as an example where 50 people were murdered in recent weeks and hundreds were shot. The speaker contends that it is time to stop this madness and that the people of the country need protection, safety, law, and order. A claim is made that it has been proven that safety can be restored, citing Washington, DC, as an example. The speaker describes DC as previously a bloodthirsty, horrible, dangerous place and one of the worst, but now it is a crime-free city, and they assert that this can be done and can happen fast. The speaker states the goal to keep it that way. The audience is urged to seek help from the president, with the message that Chicago needs help and other cities need help. The speaker pledges to take whatever actions are necessary to achieve safety, declaring that they will make America safe again, including the big cities. The address concludes with a call for support and for decisive action to restore safety and order.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: For far too long, Americans have been forced to put up with democrat run cities that set loose savage, bloodthirsty criminals to prey on innocent people. Really, very, very innocent people. In every place, they control radical left judges, politicians, and activists, and they've adopted a policy of catch and release for thugs and killers. In Charlotte, North Carolina, we saw the results of these policies when a 23 year old woman who came here from Ukraine met her bloody end on a public train. And here's a picture of it. This is the picture of it. And this is a picture of the woman, a beautiful young girl that never had problems in life with a magnificent future in this country. And now she's dead. She was slaughtered by a deranged monster who was roaming free after 14 prior arrests. We cannot allow a depraved criminal element of violent repeat offenders to continue spreading destruction and death throughout our country. We have to respond with force and strength. We have to be vicious just like they are. It's the only thing they understand. 24 of the top 25 most dangerous cities in America are run by Democrat mayors. 50 people were murdered in Chicago in recent weeks with hundreds being shot, and it's time to stop this madness. The people of our country need to insist on protection, safety, law, order. We have proven that it can be done because we did it right here in DC in District Of Columbia, the capital of America, was a bloodthirsty, horrible, dangerous place, one of the worst. And now it's a crime free city, and we're gonna keep it that way. It can be done. It can happen fast. All we want is, please, mister president, we need help. Chicago needs help. Other cities needs help. We'll do what has to be done because we're gonna make America safe again, and that includes our big cities. We're gonna make those cities safe. Thank you.

@bringbacklogic_ - Make America Logical Again

That entire day, many conservatives were talking about the death penalty for such murderers, even going as far as to say we should bring back public executions, quote-tweeting Trump's famous "public execution" tweet (that he made in 2013 in reference to the Boston marathon bombers). You will notice above that Josh didn't make his tweet until 6:05pm later that day. You can actually check quote tweets and see for yourself. Are we to believe Candace does not know how to do this? An enormous amount of people did the same thing, yet only Josh Hammer is being accused, why?

@bringbacklogic_ - Make America Logical Again

This is the horrific footage that many people watched on 9/9 that caused the outrage and response from the White House: https://t.co/23KgKGut0k

@theblaze - TheBlaze

HORRIFYING new footage of the career criminal who stabbed Ukrainian refugee Iryna Zarutska on a train in Charlotte This is the future Democrats want for America👇 https://t.co/bCSMOmVYx4

@bringbacklogic_ - Make America Logical Again

To try and frame him of foreknowledge, you have to deny all context (both retweets prior were about Iryna) and disregard everyone else talking about it that day: https://t.co/77roycPHFt

@shalomshachna - Shalom Shachna

@RealCandaceO You are literally the world’s worst “journalist” His literally two tweets DIRECTLY before that one were BOTH about Iriyna….. You are an absolute moron 🙄🙄🙄 https://t.co/8gvwv1jnuC

@bringbacklogic_ - Make America Logical Again

Here is the screen recording of his timeline. It is the job of any “journalist” to verify facts before making insane conclusions. The context and the trending topic of the day clearly shows what he was referring to: https://t.co/FnUD2cOULf

@bringbacklogic_ - Make America Logical Again

Though you can debate the idea of whether we should bring back public executions, Josh has consistently stated throughout the years that he personally believes that “someone this monstrous deserves not merely to die, but to have his life taken in the public eye..” 👇 https://t.co/dqR6sCno9w

@bringbacklogic_ - Make America Logical Again

That being said, it makes perfect sense why he would tweet “public execution” on 9/10 AFTER it had just been announced by the FBI that the assassin of his dead friend was caught (though this later turned out to be the wrong suspect). Again, Josh Hammer strongly believes the assassin deserves not just the death penalty, but to be publicly executed:

@bringbacklogic_ - Make America Logical Again

False Claim #10: An Egyptian Air Force plane departed AFTER the assassination, suggesting it was a military operation involving foreign leaders. Reality: This false claim promoted by Candace Owens appears to come from her misinterpreting "UTC" (Coordinated Universal Time) as "Utah Time." The flight in question left BEFORE Kirk's assassination took place. Though she was community noted and admits the timeline error, she still insists that it must be connected. Yet, the idea that foreign leaders would orchestrate a military operation and physically travel to the future crime scene just for a secret meeting— instead of using secure digital communication and encrypted channels like VPNs or secure video conferencing—is not only illogical but absurdly impractical in the modern era. Such a scenario would be unnecessarily risky and sloppy.

@bringbacklogic_ - Make America Logical Again

False Claim #11: “Kirk was shot by a front row audience member directly in front of him” Reality: Independent experts Chris Loesch, Gary Melton, Matt Kestor and others confirm the official narrative that a front-row shot is infeasible because ballistic analysis shows a high-angle, downward trajectory from ~400 feet, matching the Losee Center rooftop, not a close-range shot. Video and audio evidence, including a 0.5-second supersonic crack and no muzzle flash in the crowd, rule out a nearby shooter. The entry wound's location (left neck) aligns with the roof's angle, not a frontal shot. Many of the vids also show people looking back and up towards the roof of the building.

@ChrisLoesch - Chris Loesch 𝕏

Yesterday, a shooter took aim at Charlie Kirk during his speech at Utah Valley University. The weapon: an older Mauser bolt-action rifle in .30-06 Springfield, fired from the Losee Center rooftop. Distance: 131–200 yards, per mapping and video evidence. The .30-06 is an old, trusted, flat-shooting round. From a 22-inch barrel, a 165-grain bullet at 2,700 fps drops ~2.7 inches at 131 yards, ~4.3 inches at 200. Used in WW2 and Korea sniper rifles, it’s deadly accurate at these ranges. Charlie was fatally hit in the neck. A sniper’s analysis backs up what I have been saying that the shooter aimed for the head but didn’t account for that drop. It’s a shot any novice hunter could make, but a pro adjusts for drop. This was an amateur with a dark motive not some super spy. The manhunt’s on.

WellsJorda89710
Posted - January 26, 2026 at 4:02 AM
Saved - January 27, 2026 at 3:43 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m alarmed by leaked chats alleging Peggy Flanagan, “Flan Southside,” led anti-ICE ops, tracked agents, doxxed, and mobilized crowds that turned deadly. The result: deaths, injuries, and insurrection-level obstruction. This isn’t protest; it’s treason, with blood on Flanagan’s hands and the Walz admin. No more investigations—Peggy Flanagan must resign or name names. Prison for “Flan Southside.” Who else in MN Dem machine is tangled? America demands answers now: @FBIDirectorKash @AGPamBondi @DHSgov @Sec_Noem @ICEgov @realDonaldTrump @JDVance

@WellsJorda89710 - Reverend Jordan Wells

🚨 SIGNAL GATE CONFIRMED: MN LT. GOV. PEGGY FLANAGAN (“FLAN SOUTHSIDE”) PANICS IN LEAKED MESSAGES— “WE’RE ALL F**”🚨 Fresh screenshots drop the hammer: **Skye to “Betty” (undercover):** “Why would we be in trouble... relax.” **Response (panic mode):** **“SIGNAL IS NOT SECURE. I worked in communications. Once they figured out where we were, it's only a matter of time. Flan has been exposed. We're all fucked. I need to leave this state.”** **Reply:** “Should I leave too? Maybe best to get out of country.” This is **straight from the chat** where “Flan Southside” (allegedly **Lt. Gov. Peggy Flanagan**) was an **ADMIN** coordinating anti-ICE ops—tracking agents, doxxing, mobilizing crowds that turned deadly. Result? - Multiple deaths - Man’s finger gnawed off - Countless injuries - Insurrection-level obstruction of federal law enforcement **This isn’t protest. This is TREASON.** State government **directly linked** to domestic terrorists conspiring against ICE. Blood is on **Flanagan’s** hands—and Tim Walz’s admin. No more letters. No more “investigations.” **Peggy Flanagan: RESIGN or NAME NAMES.** **Prison for “Flan Southside.”** Lock her up for conspiracy, obstruction, and enabling violence against federal officers. Who else in MN Dem machine is tangled in this? Deleted pages? Running? **America demands answers NOW.** Tag & demand action: @FBIDirectorKash @AGPamBondi @DHSgov @Sec_Noem @ICEgov @realDonaldTrump @JDVance

baroncoleman
Posted - May 11, 2026 at 4:31 PM
Saved - May 11, 2026 at 7:23 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I have confirmed Tyler Robinson was in custody at the Washington County Sheriff's Office at 6:50p on September 11, 2025. You may post your apologies below. I'm eager to hear how it's normal for people to post confessions to Discord after they are in custody.

@baroncoleman - Baron Coleman

I have CONFIRMED Tyler Robinson WAS in custody at the Washington County Sheriff's Office at 6:50p on September 11, 2025. You may post your apologies below. I'm eager to hear all about how it's normal for people to post confessions to Discord AFTER they are in custody.

View Full Interactive Feed