reSee.it - Related Post Feed

Saved - October 30, 2023 at 3:49 PM

@ParsylHQ - ParsylHQ

Parsyl’s VP of Global Health Souleymane Sawadogo will be speaking at the WVC on April 21 in Washington DC. Join to learn about how Parsyl is supporting equitable global vaccine distribution to save lives and protect investments. Add session to calendar: https://hubs.la/Q018bGvh0 https://t.co/ubQtkBOC8Z

Saved - May 2, 2023 at 6:46 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF) has been found to fund both the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Foundation of the National Institutes of Health (FNIH), which allows the NIH to accept donations from non-federal sources. The FNIH is governed by individuals with ties to the NIH and BMGF. Additionally, the BMGF invests heavily in China, including funding the CDC and Peking University. The Leiber Research Group at Harvard, funded by DARPA and the NIH, specializes in nanomaterials, which are important in vaccine design. It is not surprising that there is a push for mRNA vaccines, given the funding of Moderna by DARPA, BMGF, and NIH. In another development, the US Department of Defense (DOD) blacklisted BGI for infiltrating the HarvardMIT axis through notable figures like George Church and Robert Langer. BGI collaborated with Johns Hopkins University on the Synthetic Yeast Project. Professors Jef Boeke and George Church of HarvardMIT worked on the Sequel to the Human Genome Project. BGI studied synthetic yeast with Prof Boeke and used yeast in advanced CRISPRCas genome engineering. BGI has a long history of involvement in Western academia. There are allegations that the DARPA-funded western Deep State and CCP are working together for depopulation and control through genetic engineering, including mRNA vaccines and gene editing. The World Economic Forum (WEF) and Bilderberg are also involved, as well as BGI, HarvardMIT, and Moderna. The GPWRITE project aims to clone human DNA using yeast, with BGI and the WEF endorsing it. Tessera Therapeutics, founded by Noubar Afeyan of Moderna and Lord Ara Darzi of Flagship Pioneering, is also involved. The end goal is unclear, but it appears to involve synthetic human chromosomes and control over humanity. It is worth noting that Pfizer had no problem revealing their gene therapy plans in 2016. Moderna was chosen by CEPI for funding mRNA, but delayed their mRNA LNP delivery systems. BGI had access to significant genetic data, unfortunately affiliated with the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) and the People's Liberation Army (PLA). Huanming Yang of BGI and Zhejiang University studied pathogens like SARS and bat coronaviruses from Zhoushan with the PLA.

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

Boxing clever by the 🇨🇳 CCP?? Control the WHO, control the NIH 👇 https://news.cgtn.com/news/3d3d774e3259444f78457a6333566d54/share.html https://www.who.int/news/item/12-05-2022-who-and-mpp-announce-agreement-with-nih-for-covid-19-health-technologies

China and WHO agree to increase cooperation in healthcare Chinese State Councilor and Foreign Minister Wang Yi  met with the director-general of the World Health Organization (WHO), Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus in Beijing on Tuesday.  news.cgtn.com
WHO and MPP announce agreement with NIH for COVID-19 health technologies WHO’s COVID-19 Technology Access Pool (C-TAP) and the Medicines Patent Pool (MPP) today finalized a licensing agreement with the United States National Institutes of Health (NIH) for the development of several innovative therapeutics, early-stage vaccines and diagnostic tools for COVID-19.The licenses, which are transparent, global and non-exclusive, will allow manufacturers from around the world to work with MPP and C-TAP to make these technologies accessible to people living in low- and middle-income countries and help put an end to the pandemic.The 11 COVID-19 technologies offered under two licences include the stabilized spike protein used in currently available COVID-19 vaccines, research tools for vaccine, therapeutic and diagnostic development as well as early-stage vaccine candidates and diagnostics. The full list of the NIH COVID-19 technologies covered in the agreement is here.“I welcome the generous contribution NIH has made to C-TAP and its example of solidarity and sharing,” said Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, WHO Director-General. “Whether it’s today’s pandemic or tomorrow’s health emergency, it’s through sharing and empowering lower-income countries to manufacture their own health tools that we can ensure a healthier future for everyone.” “We are honoured to sign these public health-driven licence agreements with NIH under the auspices of C-TAP with the goal of providing equitable access to life-saving health products for the most vulnerable in the world,” said Charles Gore, MPP Executive Director. “NIH were the first to share their patents with MPP for an HIV product back in 2010 when we were created, and we are delighted to continue strengthening our partnership. It is clear that MPP’s model works across different health technologies.”The announcement was made today by the US Government at the second Global COVID-19 Summit, co-hosted by the United States, Belize, Germany, Indonesia and Senegal.Licensing the NIH technologies to MPP under the auspices of C-TAP will allow greater access to these technologies and hopefully lead to the development of commercial products that can address current and future public health needs. In most circumstances, NIH will not collect royalties on sales of products licensed in 49 countries classified by the United Nations as Least Developed Countries. Launched in 2020 by the WHO Director-General and the President of Costa Rica, and supported by 43 Member States, C-TAP aims to facilitate timely, equitable and affordable access to COVID-19 health products by boosting their production and supply through open, transparent and non-exclusive licensing agreements. MPP provides the licensing expertise to this initiative and holds the licences.The 11 technologies include:  Prefusion spike proteins  (Vaccine Development) Structure-Based Design of Spike Immunogens  (Research Tool for Vaccine Development) Pseudotyping Plasmid (Research Tool for Vaccine Development) ACE2 Dimer construct (Research Tool for Drug Development) Synthetic humanized llama nanobody library and related use  (Research Tool for Drug and Diagnostic Development)Newcastle Disease Virus-Like Particles Displaying Prefusion-Stabilized  Spikes (Vaccine Candidate) Parainfluenza virus 3 based vaccine (Vaccine Candidate)A VSV-EBOV-Based Vaccine (Vaccine Candidate)RNASEH-Assisted Detection Assay for RNA (Diagnostic)Detection of SARS-CoV-2 and other RNA Virus (Diagnostic)High-Throughput Diagnostic Test  (Diagnostic)  who.int

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

MPP provides the 'Licensing Expertise!' How about the 'next' Pandemic?? Maybe just more 'mRNA' 👇 https://medicinespatentpool.org/covid-19/mrna-technology-transfer-hub-programme

mRNA Technology Transfer Programme - MPP medicinespatentpool.org

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

The WHO, C-TAP, and the NIH: includes 'assessing' a person's vulnerability to Sars-Cov-2; stabilised prefusion S Proteins; and Ebola?? 🤔👇 https://www.who.int/initiatives/covid-19-technology-access-pool/us-nih-licenses

US NIH licenses to C-TAP C-TAP – A pioneering approach to enhance the global production of and access to COVID-19 health products through voluntary, non-exclusive licensing who.int

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

Of course, WHO's 🇨🇳 Tedros is very happy with 'C-TAP', the 'MPP', and the 'NIH'. They will formulate the Word's Pathogen responses?? Oh dear! 👇

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

The "B&M Gates Foundation" allied to the "Foundation of the National Institutes of Health" of the NIH from 2003 👇 https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.299.5607.641b

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

Just in case you thought there could be "impartiality" ?? Perhaps not 🤔👇 https://fnih.org/our-programs/charles-sanders-md-partnership-award

Charles A. Sanders, M.D., Partnership Award | The Foundation for the National Institutes of Health fnih.org

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

Yes, he got one?? An award, that is 👇

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

Of course, 'gene therapy' mRNA must have always been on the cards 👇

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

Chief Executive Officer of the 'FNIH' 👇 https://fnih.org/our-people/board-of-directors

Board of Directors and Governance | The Foundation for the National Institutes of Health fnih.org

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

So, the 'FNIH' allows the 'NIH' to accept donations from "non-federal" sources, such as the 'B&M Gates Fdn'. Isn't that tantamount to political leverage?? Here's some of those that govern the 'Foundation of the NIH' (FNIH). No compromises here! https://fnih.org/our-people/board-of-directors https://fnih.org/our-people/board-of-directors

Board of Directors and Governance | The Foundation for the National Institutes of Health fnih.org

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

Contd from above: the "FNIH" 👇

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

Sorry, Contd from the above: the "FNIH" Governance. No problems with impartiality 👇

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

And, as shown previously, the man who helped set it up, "Elias Zerhouni" of the NIH in 2003, now part of the governance of the 'FNIH' 👇

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

But, of course, the 'BMGF' also has funded the WHO for over a decade? In fact, nearly equivalent to that of the US Government. Why back a controlled enterprise?? https://usnews.com/news/articles/2020-05-29/gates-foundation-donations-to-who-nearly-match-those-from-us-government https://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2020-05-29/gates-foundation-donations-to-who-nearly-match-those-from-us-government

Gates Foundation Donations to WHO Nearly Match Those From U.S. Government President Donald Trump announced Friday that the U.S. would be ‘terminating’ its relationship with the World Health Organization. usnews.com

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

The WHO is compromised by China. Politics control the WHO, NOT science nor evidence!👇 https://www.nationalreview.com/news/taiwan-accuses-who-of-failing-to-heed-warning-of-coronavirus-human-to-human-transmission/

Taiwan Accuses WHO of Failing to Heed Warning of Coronavirus Human-to-Human Transmission | National Review Taiwanese health officials have accused WHO of failing to communicate Taiwan's warning in December regarding possible human-to-human transmission of the coronavirus. nationalreview.com

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

The US Admin wished to curtail funding to the WHO in 2020. However, if the 'BMGF' still funds the WHO that political leverage by the US Admin would be diminished substantially. Moreover, the 'BMGF' has substantial financial leverage at the 'NFIH' https://gatesfoundation.org/about/committed-grants https://www.gatesfoundation.org/about/committed-grants

Committed Grants | Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation This database includes grant commitments made by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and previous foundations of the Gates family (William H. Gates Foundation, Gates Library Foundation, and Gates Learning Foundation) from 1994 onward. gatesfoundation.org

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

Who does the 'BMGF' really represent? Who controls its financial pledges outside of the US? And, if the US 'IC' had any inclinations to 🇨🇳 machinations, why was the 'BMGF' allowed to fund in China, including the WU and Huawei?? 🤔👇

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

Therefore, the 'BMGF funds both the 'NFIH' and Beijing, China?? 'Julie Gerberding' is now the CEO of the 'NFIH'. She's a biosecurity expert. So it can only get better! 🤔👇

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

Even more pertinently, how was the 'BMGF' allowed to fund the 🇨🇳 CDC? How is that allowed, and why is it even necessary?? The CDC is controlled by the 🇨🇳 CCP of Beijing 👇 https://en.chinacdc.cn/intl_cooperation/partners/index.html

International Partners----Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention en.chinacdc.cn

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

No comment 👇 https://en.chinacdc.cn/intl_cooperation/partners/index.html

International Partners----Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention en.chinacdc.cn

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

The Director of the 'BMGF' China Office is 'Zhi-Jie Zheng', who previously worked for the US CDC. As part of 'Global Health', Zheng is affiliated to Peking University which has MOUs with amongst others, Harvard, Oxford, and Karolinska https://gatesfoundation.org/about/leadership/zhi-jie-zheng https://www.gatesfoundation.org/about/leadership/zhi-jie-zheng

Zhi-Jie Zheng Dr. Zhi-Jie (ZJ) Zheng leads the foundation’s efforts to develop and strengthen partnerships across China’s public, private, and nonprofit sectors to advance health and development outcomes in China and around the world. gatesfoundation.org

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

Of course, "Harvard University" has had its own problems associated with scientific 'infiltration'. Nonetheless, the 'Leiber Research Group' at Harvard is funded by the 'NIH' amongst others?? It's problematic https://justice.gov/opa/pr/harvard-university-professor-and-two-chinese-nationals-charged-three-separate-china-related https://twitter.com/KeithEv84928885/status/1586437315526004736?t=boQFnwLmn6n5_uSIJbNbYg&s=19… https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/harvard-university-professor-and-two-chinese-nationals-charged-three-separate-china-related

Harvard University Professor and Two Chinese Nationals Charged in Three Separate China Related Cases The Department of Justice announced today that the Chair of Harvard University’s Chemistry and Chemical Biology Department and two Chinese nationals have been charged in connection with aiding the People’s Republic of China. justice.gov

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

Just a reminder: Why did Bill Gates need to pronounce his "alliance" with the NIH in 2003 at the WEF in Davos? Why did this need to be done at the WEF?? 🤔👇

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

Anyway, Prof. Charles Leiber was found guilty of his ties to 🇨🇳. His speciality, as shown above, was 'Nanomaterials'. Obviously, important in the design of vaccines too?? 👇 https://unitracker.aspi.org.au/universities/tsinghua-university

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

Interesting that "Tsinghua University" above is the alta mata of 🇨🇳 President, Xi Jinping? The 'Harvard TH Chan School', of course, is proud of its Rockefeller roots 👇 https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/about/history-and-core-values/

History and Core Values Introduction to the School Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health traces its roots to public health activism at the beginning of the last century, a time of energetic social reform. The School b… hsph.harvard.edu

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

And the new CEO of the 'FNIH' 👇

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

The 'push' for mRNA vaccines is not surprising. The 'Leiber Research Group' at Harvard is sponsored by both DARPA and the NIH. DARPA itself recognised by In-Q-Tel (CIA) as being the provider of RNA vaccines? https://iqt.org/news/munich-re-in-q-tel-select-metabiota-to-gain-deeper-insights-into-epidemic-risk-and-global-preparedness-for-infectious-diseases/ https://www.iqt.org/news/munich-re-in-q-tel-select-metabiota-to-gain-deeper-insights-into-epidemic-risk-and-global-preparedness-for-infectious-diseases/

Munich Re & In-Q-Tel Select Metabiota to Gain Deeper Insights into Epidemic Risk and Global Preparedness for Infectious Diseases - In-Q-Tel Metabiota Launches First Commercial Risk Modeling Platform and Preparedness Index to Help Insurers Understand and Underwrite Epidemic Risk August 22, […] iqt.org

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

Simultaneously, DARPA, BARDA, and the 'BMGF', amongst others, were funding "Mode-RNA" the chosen modus operandi for any future Pandemic?! 👇 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1682852/000119312518341958/d611137ds1a.htm

Webmaster Frequently Asked Questions sec.gov

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

The NIH had already signed an agreement with Moderna in 2017 👇

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

Not forgetting the 'BMGF' were funding Grand Challenges in Global Health, also aided and abetted by the 'FNIH', 'the Wellcome Trust', and the 'Canadian Institutes of Health Research' (CIHR); whilst already funding the 🇨🇳 CDC 👇

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

George Fu Gao, of the 🇨🇳 CDC and CAS, must have been a very busy scientific 'diplomat', having so many strategic partners to cater for?! 👇 https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/news-events/china-cdc-director-dr-george-f-gao-visits-ecdc

China CDC Director Dr George F. Gao visits ECDC Today, ECDC Director Dr Andrea Ammon welcomed Dr George F. Gao, Director of the Chinese Centre for Disease Control and Prevention. ecdc.europa.eu

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

And, of course, we mustn't forget the Big One! 👇https://www.ajmc.com/view/nih-bill-and-melinda-gates-foundation-collaborate-to-develop-genebased-hiv-treatment

NIH, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation Collaborate to Develop Gene-Based HIV Treatment The National Institutes of Health (NIH) has announced plans to invest at least $100 million over the next 4 years to develop gene-based therapies for 2 diseases: HIV and sickle cell disease. The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation will also contribute $100 million to the goal of advancing these potential cures, with an aim toward providing affordable, globally available treatment that will be accessible to patients in low-resource settings. ajmc.com

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

One may ask: Why did George Gao, A Fauci, Jeremey Farrar, and the BMGF, in the "Global Preparedness Monitoring Board" (GPMB), set up by the WHO and the World Bank, believe that a World Pandemic was on its way in September 2019?? https://gpmb.org/board https://twitter.com/KeithEv84928885/status/1533002554283524097?t=voVsaGELGpsuK4OH91d0lA&s=19… https://www.gpmb.org/board

Board gpmb.org

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

The BMGF invests a lot of money in the WHO. The BMGF also invests a lot of money into China! Is it the hubris of infallibility perhaps? Do not forget 'Tsinghua University' https://gcgh.grandchallenges.org/challenge/grand-challenges-china-new-interventions-global-health https://gcgh.grandchallenges.org/challenge/grand-challenges-china-new-interventions-global-health

China - New Interventions The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (the Gates Foundation) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) is launching a new Grand Challenge: New Interventions for Global Health. This challenge focuses on calls for innovative concepts for safe, effective, affordable and widely utilized interventions, such as vaccines and therapeutics, with the potential to protect against the acquisition, progression or transmission of infectious diseases that disproportionately affect the world’s poorest. This request for proposals will fund grants to collaborations comprised of teams at Chinese-based institutions and those based outside of China. Each grant must be for four years, and can be up to USD $1,000,000. For each proposal the NSFC will fund up to USD $500,000 for the work done at China-based institutions, and the Gates Foundation will fund up to USD $500,000 for the work done at institutions outside China. The collaborations between groups must be substantive in that they should propose continuous and stable cooperation on the proposed project, the groups should complement each other with their respective strengths and expertise, and the contributions between groups should be roughly equal. The application deadline is March 15, 2016, 8:00am Beijing time (March 14, 2016, 5pm Seattle time). For a detailed description of this challenge, see the Request for Proposals to the right, including translated versions. gcgh.grandchallenges.org

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

Do not forget 'Tsinghua University', NIH?? Otherwise it could be deemed very naive or even worse! Why was this even necessary?👇

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

How can the NIH justify the above? How can the "US IC" justify the BMGF organised exchange below in 2016: A collaboration between Emory University, Atlanta, and Fudan University of Shanghai?? This is dangerous exchange of "Bioscience" surreptitiously disguised as philanthropy!

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

"Zhi-Jie Zheng" of the BMGF 'Global Health' set up a meeting in 2019 between Peking University and TSU (Texas Southern University China). Now, TSU is closed due to Covid-19?? Below, the directors: one from Harvard, and one from Tsinghua University http://tsuci.org/# tsuci.org/#

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

So the BMGF is immune to oversight? Perhaps not, but who would want you to know?? Not the US IC; and definitely not the NIH, who is funded by the BMGF 👇

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

Of course, when you have the financial clout you can pull the strings. Well, you think you can, but not necessarily with the 🇨🇳. They pull you! 👇

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

The Institute of Microbiology (IMCAS), George Fu Gao (CAS), and Lixen Zhang of Harvard TH Chan. No problems 👇 https://english.im.cas.cn/ns/es/201504/t20150414_146319.html

Prof. Lixin Zhang from IMCAS became the president of SLAS Asia----INSTITUTE OF MICROBOLOGY CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES english.im.cas.cn

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

Harvard has had its own problem with 🇨🇳 infiltration. And, of course, the world renowned 'Harvard-MIT' axis would be a prime target for foreign subterfuge 👇

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

Just a reminder 👇

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

The game of espionage and subterfuge: The 'Leiber Research Group' at Harvard, as shown previously, was financed by DARPA and the NIH, amongst others. Obviously the like to keep things sweet, to serve their own Agenda?! https://asianscientist.com/2014/11/topnews/charles-lieber-wins-inaugural-tsinghua-springer-research-award/ https://www.asianscientist.com/2014/11/topnews/charles-lieber-wins-inaugural-tsinghua-springer-research-award/

Charles Lieber Wins Inaugural Tsinghua-Springer Research Award - Asian Scientist Magazine The inaugural Tsinghua University Press-Springer Nano Research Award has been given to Professor Charles M. Lieber. asianscientist.com

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

Harvard's 'Leiber' and MIT's 'Langer' below 👇

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

The "Broad Institute" of Harvard-MIT: 'Eric Lander' and 'Huanming Yang' of now US DOD blacklisted 🇨🇳 Military asset "BGI" in 2010. Mistakes will be made of course! 👇 https://www.broadinstitute.org/history-leadership/founders

Founders broadinstitute.org

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

Fortunately, "BGI" have been exposed. Unfortunately for 'Eric Lander', "Eric E Schmidt", happens to be on the Board of Directors of the 'Broad Institute!'. His report for the US "National Security Commission" is below https://campusreform.org/article?id=17067… https://campusreform.org/article?id=17067

National security commission, chaired by former Google chairman, warns of Chinese Communist efforts to infiltrate US universities A new report by a commission chaired by former Google Chairman Eric Schmidt stated that American universities need to take measures to protect research from being stolen by China. campusreform.org

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

Coincidentally, since January 2021, 'Lander' stepped down from his Leadership role at the 'Broad Institute', taking an "unpaid, academic leave-of-absence"? His place taken by Todd Golub 👇 https://www.broadinstitute.org/history-leadership/founders

Founders broadinstitute.org

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

How to infiltrate US Academia: 🇨🇳 BGI to work with the Harvard-MIT "Broad Institute" from June 2017 (unfortunately the link to the BGI page below wouldn't upload!) 👇

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

Of course, there's no problems on the 'MIT' side of things, none at all?? It's controlled by "DARPA" who funded the 'Leiber Research Group' at Harvard, and also funded Moderna's RNA! https://news.mit.edu/2022/ashton-carter-secretary-defense-1031 https://twitter.com/KeithEv84928885/status/1587432541027549184?t=7a76JMMfW02teZVu12sXfA&s=19… https://news.mit.edu/2022/ashton-carter-secretary-defense-1031

Ashton Carter, former U.S. secretary of defense who served in leadership roles at the MIT Corporation and Lincoln Laboratory, dies at 68 Ashton Carter, former U.S. Secretary of Defense and a lifelong advocate of technological innovation who applied his training as a physicist toward public policy, died of a heart attack Oct. 24 in Boston. He was 68. He engaged with MIT in a variety of roles throughout his career, including as a member of the executive committee of the MIT Corporation, the Institute’s board of trustees, and as a member and chair of the advisory board of MIT Lincoln Laboratory. news.mit.edu

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

Just keep it in the Family?? If One falls, we ALL Fall! DARPA funded, 'Charles Leiber' at Harvard; and DARPA funded Moderna's Co-founders: Dr Noubar Afeyan and Dr Robert Langer https://imperial.ac.uk/news/235754/moderna-co-founder-dr-noubar-afeyan-talks/ https://news.mit.edu/2022/corporation-term-life-members-0606 https://twitter.com/KeithEv84928885/status/1588105741415612416?t=alxXZEd3lBI32ftXzKjlqw&s=19… https://www.imperial.ac.uk/news/235754/moderna-co-founder-dr-noubar-afeyan-talks/ https://news.mit.edu/2022/corporation-term-life-members-0606

Moderna co-founder Dr Noubar Afeyan talks the future of innovation in biotech | Imperial News | Imperial College London MODERNA CHAIRMAN VISIT - Imperial hosted Dr Noubar Afeyan, CEO of Flagship Pioneering and chairman of Moderna for a talk on innovation. imperial.ac.uk
MIT Corporation elects nine term members, three life members MIT has elected nine term members and three life members to its corporation. news.mit.edu

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

Moreover, US DOD blacklisted "BGI" were infiltrating the Harvard-MIT axis through other notables. "George Church" of Harvard, the Godfather of Genetics, as is Robert Langer of MIT. 'Church' and 'Huanming Yang' of BGI https://yicaiglobal.com/news/bgi-genomics-to-set-up-synthetic-biology-institute-headed-by-harvard-genetics-professor https://twitter.com/KeithEv84928885/status/1588155699007209475?t=HrI7r7Jw3dUUp6yULL93Tw&s=19… https://www.yicaiglobal.com/news/bgi-genomics-to-set-up-synthetic-biology-institute-headed-by-harvard-genetics-professor

BGI Genomics to Set Up Synthetic Biology Institute Headed by Harvard Genetics Professor yicaiglobal.com

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

BGI and Johns Hopkins University sign collaboration on "Synthetic Yeast Project" in 2011: Huanming Yang and Yue Shen (Head of Synthetic Biology Unit) at BGI; and 'Dr Jef Boeke' (Director of Biology Center) from the JHU https://eurekalert.org/news-releases/594181 https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/594181

BGI announces collaboration with Johns Hopkins University on synthetic yeast project BGI, the world's largest genomic organization, and Johns Hopkins University today signed a collaborative research agreement for the synthetic yeast project, an ambitious synthetic biology project which seeks to re-design and synthesize the yeast genome. eurekalert.org

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

The 'Sequel' to the Human Genome Project: 'The Genome Project-Write'. Prof. Jef Boeke of JHU, and Prof. George Church of Harvard-MIT (2016) 👇 https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aaf6850

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

The CCP asset "BGI" must have been very happy studying 'synthetic yeast' with Prof. Boeke from Hopkins. And, with their long-term relationship of Prof. George Church (Harvard-MIT) who was using "yeast" in advanced "CRISPR-Cas" genome engineering! https://academic.oup.com/nar/article/41/7/4336/1075252 https://academic.oup.com/nar/article/41/7/4336/1075252

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

Coincidentally, by March 2017, Huanming Yang at BGI's "James D Watson Institute of Genome Sciences" (Zhejiang University, ZHU) were doing very similar techniques with "yeast", aided by Prof. D Boeke, shown above. ZHU has its own history! https://science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aaf4704 https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aaf4704

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

Of course, Biotechnology can be used both ways?? Even to make a BW. And, to prove it, here is Silly 'Volkier Thiel', cloning 'Sars-Cov-2' with quick "Yeast-Based Method", done by 20th Feb 2020. What?! Yes, Yeast! https://the-scientist.com/news-opinion/scientists-clone-sars-cov-2-genome-with-quick-yeast-based-method-67515 https://nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2294-9#article-info… https://www.the-scientist.com/news-opinion/scientists-clone-sars-cov-2-genome-with-quick-yeast-based-method-67515 https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2294-9#article-info

Scientists Clone SARS-CoV-2 Genome with Quick Yeast-Based Method The use of yeast artificial chromosomes has enabled the rapid genetic reconstruction of the novel coronavirus. the-scientist.com
Rapid reconstruction of SARS-CoV-2 using a synthetic genomics platform - Nature Reverse genetics has been an indispensable tool to gain insights into viral pathogenesis and vaccine development. The genomes of large RNA viruses, such as those from coronaviruses, are cumbersome to clone and manipulate in Escherichia coli owing to the size and occasional instability of the genome1–3. Therefore, an alternative rapid and robust reverse-genetics platform for RNA viruses would benefit the research community. Here we show the full functionality of a yeast-based synthetic genomics platform to genetically reconstruct diverse RNA viruses, including members of the Coronaviridae, Flaviviridae and Pneumoviridae families. Viral subgenomic fragments were generated using viral isolates, cloned viral DNA, clinical samples or synthetic DNA, and these fragments were then reassembled in one step in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using transformation-associated recombination cloning to maintain the genome as a yeast artificial chromosome. T7 RNA polymerase was then used to generate infectious RNA to rescue viable virus. Using this platform, we were able to engineer and generate chemically synthesized clones of the virus, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)4, which has caused the recent pandemic of coronavirus disease (COVID-19), in only a week after receipt of the synthetic DNA fragments. The technical advance that we describe here facilitates rapid responses to emerging viruses as it enables the real-time generation and functional characterization of evolving RNA virus variants during an outbreak. A yeast-based synthetic genomics platform is used to reconstruct and characterize large RNA viruses from synthetic DNA fragments; this technique will facilitate the rapid analysis of RNA viruses, such as SARS-CoV-2, during an outbreak. nature.com

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

Additionally, Christian Drosten was co-author, which makes it much more likely that the "Yeast-Based Method" is entirely Zoonatic?! Remembering that the actual genome of Sars-CoV-2 wasn't released until ~ the 10th Jan '20. George would have been proud!

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

Just for the record, 'Huanming Yang' of BGI studied at Harvard University. Zhejiang University (ZHU) is the Alumni University of Maj. Gen Chen Wei of the 🇨🇳 PLA, Chief Bioweapons Expert 👇

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

'Thiel' may be silly, but Western Academia is 'brainwashed' by its own desires and designs: The US IC needs to be indicted? And very quickly! 👇

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

And when you know that the Bullshit gauge hits 100% time for a reality check: This is delinquent! https://prnewswire.com/news-releases/bgi-and-the-bill--melinda-gates-foundation-sign-memorandum-of-understanding-on-collaboration-for-global-health-and-agricultural-development-171139691.html https://twitter.com/KeithEv84928885/status/1587383331666132993?t=YYWb8r7XoY_Dl1I1Er8IgQ&s=19… https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/bgi-and-the-bill--melinda-gates-foundation-sign-memorandum-of-understanding-on-collaboration-for-global-health-and-agricultural-development-171139691.html

BGI and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation Sign Memorandum of Understanding on Collaboration for Global Health and Agricultural Development /PRNewswire/ -- BGI, the world's largest genomics organization, announced today that it and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation have signed a Memorandum of... prnewswire.com

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

Why did the US DOD blacklist BGI? It is more easier to understand now: The 🇨🇳 infiltration of the US Academia and Agencies by the 🇨🇳 CCP working on a long-term plan with "BGI" as an Agent 👇

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

Prof Jef Boeke is on the advisory board of the 'Wyss Lab' at Harvard, headed by Prof George Church. Unfortunately, Dr Huanming Yang is allied to the 🇨🇳 CCP 👇

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

No problems with sharing "Yeast Golden Gate Assembly" to 🇨🇳 BGI 👇

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

Of course, Prof. Jef Boeke received his PhD from the Rockefeller University, who took over the Medical Profession and are affiliated to Harvard. Allied with Huanming Yang of BGI and the Pasteur Institute. From 2017 https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5679085/#!po=74.1667… https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5679085/#!po=74.1667

3D organization of synthetic and scrambled chromosomes The overall organization of budding yeast chromosomes is driven and regulated by four factors: (i) the tethering and clustering of centromeres at the spindle pole body; (ii) the loose tethering of telomeres at the nuclear envelope, where they form small, ... ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

Just an aside: Bill Gates' Father (Planned Parenthood) below and the Rockefellers 👇

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

More importantly, the advance of science by the "Broad Institute" which, as shown previously, was infiltrated by the 🇨🇳 CCP asset BGI 👇 https://www.broadinstitute.org/news/7360

International team characterizes three potential alternatives to Cas9 An international team of CRISPR-Cas researchers has identified three new naturally-occurring systems that show potential for genome editing. The discovery and characterization of these systems is expected to further expand the genome editing toolbox, opening new avenues for biomedical research. The research, published today in the journal Molecular Cell, was supported in part by the National Institutes of Health. broadinstitute.org

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

Interestingly, that 'novel' technology from "Harvard-MIT" was already be ung utilised by the 🇨🇳 scientists at CAS Beijing 🤔👇 https://news.mit.edu/2019/scientists-engineer-crispr-cas12b-dna-targeting-0122

Scientists engineer new CRISPR platform for DNA targeting Researchers have engineered another CRISPR system, Cas12b, which offers improved capabilities and options when compared to CRISPR-Cas9 systems. The work was led by Feng Zhang of the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, the McGovern Institute, and MIT. news.mit.edu

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

Here is that the "CRISPR-Cas12b" gene editing biotechnology from Beijing CAS, (as refenced above) utilised by Sept 2018. Surely, just a coincidence @Kevin_McKernan @quay_dr @R_H_Ebright @breakfast_dogs @thesmokingrdog @CharlesRixey https://nature.com/articles/s41421-018-0069-3 https://www.nature.com/articles/s41421-018-0069-3

Repurposing CRISPR-Cas12b for mammalian genome engineering - Cell Discovery The prokaryotic CRISPR-Cas adaptive immune systems provide valuable resources to develop genome editing tools, such as CRISPR-Cas9 and CRISPR-Cas12a/Cpf1. Recently, CRISPR-Cas12b/C2c1, a distinct type V-B system, has been characterized as a dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease system. Though being active in vitro, its cleavage activity at endogenous genome remains to be explored. Furthermore, the optimal cleavage temperature of the reported Cas12b orthologs is higher than 40 °C, which is unsuitable for mammalian applications. Here, we report the identification of a Cas12b system from the Alicyclobacillus acidiphilus (AaCas12b), which maintains optimal nuclease activity over a wide temperature range (31 °C–59 °C). AaCas12b can be repurposed to engineer mammalian genomes for versatile applications, including single and multiplex genome editing, gene activation, and generation of gene mutant mouse models. Moreover, whole-genome sequencing reveals high specificity and minimal off-target effects of AaCas12b-meditated genome editing. Our findings establish CRISPR-Cas12b as a versatile tool for mammalian genome engineering. nature.com

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

Just an important reminder below 👇

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

Of course, the Harvard-MIT connection, and the Sequel to the HGP known as GP-Write, is headed by Prof. Jef Boeke and Prof. George Church as shown below. Interesting Consortium members including DARPA and BGI https://engineeringbiologycenter.org/gp-write-consortium/ https://engineeringbiologycenter.org/gp-write-consortium/

GP-write Consortium | The Center of Excellence for Engineering Biology To date, more than 60 scientists, affiliated with more than 54 institutions in greater than 13 countries, have opted to participate in GP-write. engineeringbiologycenter.org

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

However, there's no problems about infiltration? @Ayjchan is also a 'consortium' member and Advisor to the Broad Institute of Harvard-MIT. So the facts of a BW instead of a Lab-leak will soon be identified @R_H_Ebright @quay_dr @DrLiMengYAN1 @CharlesRixey @pathogenetics

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

Historical facts: The US DOD blacklisted 🇨🇳 BGI 🤔 SIilence is Golden?! 👇

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

Here's a reminder:

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

Of course, "Yeast" isn't that important? That is, unless you prefer it to the 'BAC' method of "genetic cloning" allied with CRISPR 👇

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

Just a reminder of 'Harvard-MIT' below: Leiber (left) convicted of 'liaison' with Wuhan University and his Sponsors below, and Robert Langer of MIT (right) https://justice.gov/opa/pr/harvard-university-professor-and-two-chinese-nationals-charged-three-separate-china-related https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/harvard-university-professor-and-two-chinese-nationals-charged-three-separate-china-related

Harvard University Professor and Two Chinese Nationals Charged in Three Separate China Related Cases The Department of Justice announced today that the Chair of Harvard University’s Chemistry and Chemical Biology Department and two Chinese nationals have been charged in connection with aiding the People’s Republic of China. justice.gov

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

Also, a very 'interesting' selection of some current Lab members of 'The Langer Lab' at MIT, including Wuhan University and ZHU. Contd below 🤔👇 langer-lab.mit.edu/people/current

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

At least 'Renegade' is happy below. 🇨🇳 Tianjin University and Fudan University and 🇨🇳 CAS must be very happy too 👇 langer-lab.mit.edu/people/current

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

US DOD blacklisted 🇨🇳 BGI were engaged and entertained by western Academia. The US IC must have been totally negligent (or otherwise). Now US Academia has to disengage 👇 https://bgiamericas.com/about-us/bgi-advisory-board/

BGI Advisory Board | BGI Americas BGI, the largest genomics center in the world, provides comprehensive sequencing and bioinformatics services for medical, agricultural and environmental applications. bgiamericas.com

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

Leiber obviously wasn't busy enough at Harvard? He was lecturing at ZHU in 2019?! Better news for George Church: He was made 'Honorary Professor' at ZHU, and was recognised for his 'colloborative' help by Fudan University! https://zju.edu.cn/english/19992/list.htm https://life.fudan.edu.cn/90/e5/c28138a299237/page.htm https://www.zju.edu.cn/english/19992/list.htm https://life.fudan.edu.cn/90/e5/c28138a299237/page.htm

Lecture Series zju.edu.cn
George Church受聘复旦大学名誉教授颁证仪式暨PGP China启动仪式圆满完成 复旦大学 life.fudan.edu.cn

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

"The WUT-Harvard Joint Nano Key Laboratory" officially established in 2013? And the US IC didn't know?! Leiber, and Mai Liqiang who himself studied at Harvard 2008-11 below👇 english.whut.edu.cn/cam/news/20210…

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

So, the convicted Leiber was an associate of Langer, co-founder of Moderna. The Leiber Research Group funded by the NIH and DARPA. The Sponsors of Moderna continued below 👇

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

If one falls, they ALL fall?? Partnerships including NIH from 2015👇 https://www.modernatx.com/en-US/partnerships/strategic-collaborators

Organizations and companies Moderna works with. Moderna collaborates with pharmaceutical, government and research organizations to further mRNA medicines. modernatx.com

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

Contd. from above: Partners of Moderna. It's 'Mercky' business! 👇

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

Therefore, 'Merck' is affiliated with both Moderna and Pfizer. And don't forget the now US DOD blacklisted 🇨🇳 'BGI' 👇 https://www.fiercebiotech.com/biotech/merck-and-bgi-establish-strategic-collaboration-focused-on-biomarkers-and-genomic

Merck and BGI Establish Strategic Collaboration focused on Biomarkers and Genomic Technologies Merck and BGI Establish Strategic Collaboration focused on Biomarkers and Genomic Technologies WHITEHOUSE STATION, N.J. & SHENZHEN, China, Sep 13, 2011 (BUSINESS WIRE) -- Merck fiercebiotech.com

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

And, very interestingly, "BGI" of the James D Watson Institute of Genomics at Zhejiang University and Huanming Yang were 'studying' effects of 'HIV' vaccines on the immune system in 2018 with MERCK? A finger in every pie! https://frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2018.02931/full https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2018.02931/full

Corrigendum: A Comprehensive Analysis of the T and B Lymphocytes Repertoire Shaped by HIV Vaccines Corrigendum: A Comprehensive Analysis of the T and B Lymphocytes Repertoire Shaped by HIV Vaccines frontiersin.org

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

'Pfizer' has a long history of involvement in China. BGI has a long history of involvement in western Academia. They are serious scientists. And don't forget 'The Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center!' https://pfizer.com.cn/pfizer-china/pfizer_s_milestones_in_china_en.html https://www.pfizer.com.cn/pfizer-china/pfizer_s_milestones_in_china_en.html

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

So DARPA funded Harvard-MIT in mRNA. DARPA also liaised with In-Q-Tel (shown previously) the 'arm' of the US IC (CIA). Therefore, if the Senate Report below from 2019 highlights the failings of the FBI and of the NIH, who informed the Senate?? https://twitter.com/KeithEv84928885/status/1590261267532742656?t=JPCwoT4m6JX8729VdVZmrQ&s=19…

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

Did anyone at the 'Langer Lab' at MIT ever read the Senate Report above?? Or doesn't it count, as they are funded by DARPA! So who really were 'orchestrating' and aiding the infiltration of US Academia https://twitter.com/KeithEv84928885/status/1589306276559065094?t=sPGXxG3NIlI0U1I8RIx3cA&s=19…

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

The Godfathers of Human Gene editing: HARVARD-MIT. George Church (BGI) of Harvard; and Robert Langer of MIT, co-founder of Moderna. Plus the convicted Charles Leiber of Harvard and the WUT, Wuhan. And CCP 'BGI' who worked with PLA scientists at Wuhan https://twitter.com/KeithEv84928885/status/1566742810761592832?t=BK31bLJpgA31T7Osi-_aDQ&s=19…

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

The History of BGI: From SARS1 to SARS2. Affiliated to the 🇨🇳 AMMS and Wuchan Cao of the PLA, understudy to Maj Gen Chen Wei, chief Bioweapon Expert, Alumni of Zhejiang University 👇 https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF03184203

A complete sequence and comparative analysis of a SARS-associated virus (Isolate BJ01) - Science Bulletin The genome sequence of the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS)-associated virus provides essential information for the identification of pathogen(s), link.springer.com

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

Not forgetting the NIH agreement with Moderna from 2015, shown previously; and Merck's affiliation to Moderna and Pfizer (shown previously). Collins of the NIH, and BGI allied to Merck below https://twitter.com/KeithEv84928885/status/1586267455462465537?t=PNt8qkvf1hNfCsa00bsLsA&s=19…

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

So it's not surprising that the former President of Merck and Director of the CDC gets appointed to the CEO of the FNIH, which is strongly funded by the BMGF? Keep it in the family, perhaps?? If one lemming jumps over, they all jump over!🤔👇

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

Crossing the 'Deep State' of DARPA controlled Harvard-MIT: It could be the difference between life and death?? 👇

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

Allies to the Deep State CIA: DARPA funded Harvard-MIT. Into the Spider's Web?? 👇

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

The DARPA 'Deep State' Plan: Genetic Engineering. CCP BW1: Sars-Cov-2; followed by the western 'Deep State' BW2: the mRNA S Protein. The western 'Elites' allied to the CCP for Depopulation and Control, funded by DARPA H/t to @BlueJ11274903 https://investors.modernatx.com/news/news-details/2020/DARPA-Awards-Moderna-up-to-56-Million-to-Enable-Small-Scale-Rapid-Mobile-Manufacturing-of-Nucleic-Acid-Vaccines-and-Therapeutics/default.aspx https://investors.modernatx.com/news/news-details/2020/DARPA-Awards-Moderna-up-to-56-Million-to-Enable-Small-Scale-Rapid-Mobile-Manufacturing-of-Nucleic-Acid-Vaccines-and-Therapeutics/default.aspx

DARPA Awards Moderna up to $56 Million to Enable Small-Scale, Rapid Mobile Manufacturing of Nucleic Acid Vaccines and Therapeutics DARPA Awards Moderna up to $56 Million to Enable Small-Scale, Rapid Mobile Manufacturing of Nucleic Acid Vaccines and Therapeutics October 8, 2020 at 6:50 AM EDT PDF Version Award part of DARPA’s Nucleic Acids On-Demand World-Wide (NOW) initiative to develop a medical countermeasure manufacturing platform Conference call to be held on Thursday, October 8 at 8:00 a.m. ET Oct. 8, 2020- Moderna, Inc. , (Nasdaq: MRNA) a biotechnology company pioneering messenger RNA (mRNA) therapeutics and vaccines investors.modernatx.com

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

The DARPA 'funded' Harvard-MIT connection and the Broad Institute allied to US DOD blacklisted BGI. Robert Langer and Noubar Afeyan (Co-founders of Moderna) below, plus George Church of Harvard. Gene Editing https://twitter.com/KeithEv84928885/status/1545696353585602563?t=-86Oos_JYVBFqm13cWwEfQ&s=19…

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

The 4th World Reich: The genetic manipulation of Man. The Elite control of Humanity. The Plan of Plans: The western Deep State and the 🇨🇳 CCP 👇

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

The WEF and Bilderberg: including the Steering Committee from 2014 of Kissinger, Rothschilds, and Rockefellers, and Klaus Schwab 👇 web.archive.org/web/2014020209…

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

Edel-'Wyss': financed from Switzerland to the WEF. The Trojan horse of Philanthropy 👇

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

From the HGP to GP-WRITE (Human Gene Editing) 👇 https://www.statnews.com/2016/05/13/harvard-meeting-synthetic-genome/

Top scientists hold closed meeting to discuss building a human genome from scratch More than 130 scientists, officials, and others met to discuss the topic of creating a large synthetic genome — including, but not limited to, humans. statnews.com

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

"Tessara Therapeutics" set up by Nouber Afeyan, co-founder of Moderna, along with Robert Langer of MIT. Interesting scientific Advisors 👇 https://www.flagshippioneering.com/people/noubar-afeyan

Noubar Afeyan Noubar Afeyan is founder and CEO of Flagship Pioneering. Prior to founding Flagship Pioneering, Noubar was the founder and CEO of PerSeptive Biosystems, a… flagshippioneering.com

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

Including 'Prof Jef Boeke' of both Johns Hopkins University and NYU, and George Church of the Wyss Institute, both 'affiliated' to BGI, as shown previously https://twitter.com/KeithEv84928885/status/1588959992916635648?t=Lf0ybmkYm5yWFNCAZvxhYw&s=19…

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

From Harvard to 🇨🇳 BGI 👇

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

From Edel-'Wyss' to Wuhan 👇 H/O @LizMartinezES https://nypost.com/2022/05/26/inside-swiss-billionaire-hansjorg-wyss-dark-money-dem-donations/

Swiss billionaire behind Dem ‘dark money’ donations despite not being US citizen Swiss billionaire Hansjörg Wyss is said to be funneling millions of dollars into influencing 2022 midterms elections despite not being a US citizen, according to sources. nypost.com

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

Just a reminder here: Merck allied to BGI 👇

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

Human Genome Editing?? 🇨🇳 CCP "BGI" at Wuhan 🤔👇 https://patents.justia.com/patent/9695483

US Patent for Method of determining HPV integration site in genome of human tissue sample, system and use thereof Patent (Patent # 9,695,483 issued July 4, 2017) - Justia Patents Search Disclosed are a method of determining an HPV integration site in a genome of a human tissue sample and a system thereof. The method comprises: subjecting genome DNA of the human tissue sample to a first sequencing, to obtain a sequencing result; determining DNA fragments containing both HPV sequence and human genome sequence, based on the sequencing result; determining a pair of amplification primers based on the DNA fragments containing both HPV sequence and human genome sequence, subjecting the genome DNA of the human tissue sample to PCR amplification using the pair of amplification primers, to obtain PCR product; and subjecting the PCR product to a second sequencing, to determine the integration site in a genome of the human tissue sample. The method is easy to be operated with low cost, high efficiency and excellent repeatability, which may be used to detect all HPV genotypes one time, and may rapidly and accurately determine detailed sequence information and integration site. patents.justia.com

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

BGI at Wuhan 👇

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

They endeavour to create 'Synthetic Human Chromosomes' using Yeast, but can't identify the origins of an infectious Clone known as Sars-Cov-2! 🤔👇 @Ayjchan @CharlesRixey @R_H_Ebright@Harvard2H

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

The PLAN of the Eugenicists: BW1: The 🇨🇳 Sars-Cov-2. BW2: the western 'Deep State' emergency use of mRNA?? The introduction of 'Gene Editing' to Humanity 👇

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

The CCP controlled PLA (Maj Gen. Chen Wei) delayed the use of mRNA gene 'therapy' until the Deep State had employed theirs?? Facts https://thestar.com.my/aseanplus/aseanplus-news/2021/03/07/china-zhong-nanshan-chen-wei-embark-on-new-type-of-vaccine-rd https://twitter.com/KeithEv84928885/status/1530151058785423361?t=TOLELUr8tgis51yfKPvcDg&s=19… https://www.thestar.com.my/aseanplus/aseanplus-news/2021/03/07/china-zhong-nanshan-chen-wei-embark-on-new-type-of-vaccine-rd

China: Zhong Nanshan, Chen Wei embark on new type of vaccine R&D Thanks to a nano-carrier research breakthrough, Chinese scientists, including top epidemiologist Zhong Nanshan, have embarked on developing an advanced type of Covid-19 mRNA vaccine, which can be preserved for half a year under the condition of two to eight degrees Celsius. thestar.com.my

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

Moreover, the 🇨🇳 Military had already developed "viral inhibitors" for the Elites and for the PLA against SARS. Maj.Gen Chen Wei is an Alumni of Zhejiang University 👇 https://patents.google.com/patent/CN108659105B/zh

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

And just like the Third Reich, the 4th Reich of the western Deep State funded mercenaries argue about ownership of the SS Protein 👇

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

S Protein: Sars-Cov-2 S Protein: mRNA 👇

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

The 4th Reich of the western Deep State (funders of the WEF and the EU) allied to the 🇨🇳 Elites of the CCP, controllers of the PLA 👇

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

That which should be most Holy?? The Secret Place of the Most High: The Place of the Skull 👇

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

That No Man May Buy or Sell?? 👇

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

"First to the Jew, then to the Gentiles" The SS Protein: The Corona of SPIKES upon the Head of Humanity 👇

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

Just a reminder 👇

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

Here's Pentagon funded DARPA: Death at the flick of a Switch 👇

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

The WEF and 'BGI': affiliated to George Church of Harvard-MIT (as shown previously). The Human Genome Project (GP-Write) the sequel of the HGP 👇

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

Humans in the Making: Beast-like Men? Pluripotent Stem Cells (IPS). This IS Real. From Sept 2011 MIT Technology Review. The 🇨🇳 CCP and DARPA would be delighted👇 https://www.technologyreview.com/2011/09/14/257871/george-church-on-the-future-of-stem-cells/

George Church on the Future of Stem Cells Earlier this year, I had breakfast with George Church, professor of genetics and director of the Center for Computational Genetics at Harvard Medical School. (Click here to read my profile of Church in the New York Times.) A pioneer in developing DNA sequencing technologies, and in researching everything from epigenetics and microbiomics to synthetic biology,… technologyreview.com

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

In the Beginning was the Word: GP-WRITE. It's one hell of a Consortium: including many notable institutions (DARPA & BGI) and many notable Scientists. We mustn't forget Noubar Afeyan (Moderna and Flagship) for the WEF too https://engineeringbiologycenter.org/about/ https://engineeringbiologycenter.org/about/

About | The Center of Excellence for Engineering Biology Our Mission: To Understand the Blueprint of Life. Home of GP-write. engineeringbiologycenter.org

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

Just a reminder here of 'Flagship' and the scientific Advisors for its creation, 'Tessera Therapeutics' 👇

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

The 🇨🇳 CCP State Asset BGI's 'Huada Gene Technology' at Wuhan. BGI affiliated to George Church of Harvard-MIT 👇

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

GP-WRITE 2017: Using 'Yeast' for DNA Cultivation and Storage. Cloning and Artificial Chromosomes. 'BGI' were involved from the beginning https://engineeringbiologycenter.org/about/ https://twitter.com/KeithEv84928885/status/1588571309684183041?t=UnUB8bmxq-SpCOrNmRKdSQ&s=19… https://engineeringbiologycenter.org/about/

About | The Center of Excellence for Engineering Biology Our Mission: To Understand the Blueprint of Life. Home of GP-write. engineeringbiologycenter.org

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

Just a reminder: Using Yeast to "Clone" Sars-CoV-2 Below. Remember that BGI were involved heavily with the 🇨🇳 Military. Volkier Thiel and Christian Drosten 👇

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

BGI had developed a "quick CRISPR Cas-9" (qCas9) Genome Editing Tool by Aug 2019. Involved was iCarbonX affiliated with the WEF, as is BGI (Above). iCarbonX wants to 'Digitise Life'. Carbon may be the giveaway. Contd below https://biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/708404v1 https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/708404v1

Enhance genome editing efficiency and specificity by a quick CRISPR/Cas9 system bioRxiv - the preprint server for biology, operated by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, a research and educational institution biorxiv.org

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

Wang Jun, Co-founder BGI, and founder of 🇨🇳 iCarbonX affiliated with the WEF: Control, Control, Control, guised as Philanthropy👇 https://www.icarbonx.com/en/about.html

Our Difference - iCarbonX iCarbonX icarbonx.com

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

SARS-COV-2: A Military "Infectious Clone" using BGI Technology?? Fauci knows of the 'FCS' by 1st Feb '20. By Feb 5/6th he mentions CRISPR expert Zhang (MIT) and 'Comp. Biology' expert Saberi (Harvard-MIT). NOT convinced of Proximal Origins?! Contd FOI'd by @JamesCTobias

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

Were not the expert 'Virologists' able to decipher a 'natural' Coronavirus such as Sars-Cov-2?? Obviously, Not. Genetic Experts of Harvard-MIT were needed https://sabetilab.org https://twitter.com/KeithEv84928885/status/1590096590962036736?t=g3dhJHfFyNP0x2x55HucKQ&s=19… https://www.sabetilab.org/

Sabeti Lab sabetilab.org

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

US DOD blacklisted 'BGI': Of course, who would want to even admit to the possibility of the use of "cloning technology" by the to produce a BW by infiltrated western Academia funded by DARPA and USAID?? @JamieMetzl @Ayjchan https://twitter.com/KeithEv84928885/status/1588959992916635648?t=Tw7sp2NMzbj4J62uW0U6dw&s=19…

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

Of course, 'Harvard-MIT' are not compromised in anyway. Nor should one ever doubt their genuineness in "gene therapy" for the masses either?? https://cbi.mit.edu/about_old/members/ https://twitter.com/KeithEv84928885/status/1592803212700319745?t=r4AlLUJ-Mqm_tEtVHfo4DQ&s=19… https://cbi.mit.edu/about_old/members/

CBI Partners | Bringing academia, industry, and government together. Full listing of all members and partners for MIT's Center for Biomedical Innovation (CBI) - including those for Biomanufacturing@MIT-CBI - BioACCESS, BioMAN, CAACB; NEWDIGS - FOCUS and LEAPS cbi.mit.edu

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

Unfortunately, they were all linked to 🇨🇳 BGI! Fortunately for them, they were ALL prepared for Disease X with mRNA, including the NIH 👇

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

CEPI founded in 2017: Founders including the WEF, Wellcome Foundation, and the BMGF. Of course, BARDA is involved https://cepi.net/news_cepi/cepi-partners-with-imperial-college-to-develop-transformative-rapid-response-technology-to-create-vaccines-against-emerging-infectious-diseases/ https://cepi.net/news_cepi/cepi-partners-with-imperial-college-to-develop-transformative-rapid-response-technology-to-create-vaccines-against-emerging-infectious-diseases/

CEPI partners with Imperial College to develop transformative rapid-response technology to create vaccines against emerging infectious diseases – CEPI cepi.net

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

Not forgetting that Lord Ara Darzi from above of Imperial College and the WEF (below) is partner to Noubar Afeyan (Moderna) and belongs to Flagship Pioneering which founded Tessera Therapeutics https://twitter.com/KeithEv84928885/status/1593961086641897472?t=n0OL0yLseNirY1ACf7tsiw&s=19…

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

Therefore, Lord Ara Darzi of Flagship is affiliated to Tessara Therapeutics of Prof George Church (Harvard-MIT) and Prof Jef Boeke (Johns Hopkins & NYU). Interestingly, they both were involved with BGI and "Yeast Engineering" https://twitter.com/KeithEv84928885/status/1588607700887560192?t=oB4LqSvy00f9SCgBZDQB2g&s=19…

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

Just a reminder here of the truth of the situation 👇

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

Human Genome Editing for the WEF: "The Center of Excellence for Engineering Biology" is the home of 'GP-Write' (shown previously) set up by Church and Boeke. BGI are already there. Moderna are ready too. All aligned by Pandemic X https://twitter.com/KeithEv84928885/status/1593988281733103616?t=yK08c_empLfN9uEOl93d3w&s=19…

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

Huanming Yang of BGI (below) from the above Paper on Synthetic Chromosomes with Prof. Jef Boeke. Also their Wuhan Branch👇

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

So Church and Boeke of GP-WRITE (who want to clone human DNA using Yeast) and of Tessera Therapeutics founded by 'Flagship Pioneering' of Noubar Afeyan and Lord Ara Darzi. Noubar Afeyan of Moderna, both of the WEF https://twitter.com/KeithEv84928885/status/1597725951974346753?t=jEvnwlC7cGKal7CQ_QNXvA&s=19…

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

"GP-Write": allied to 🇨🇳 BGI as part of the HGP, and endorsed by the WEF. It's all in the game known as Philanthropy 👇

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

Tessera Therapeutics: How many People on the Earth need Gene Therapy or Artificial Human Chromosomes?? Can't be much profit on Therapeutics? And Who wants to eat 'synthetic food?!'👇

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

Tessera Therapeutics linked to Moderna & Co-founder Noubar Afeyan of the WEF. And Tessera inextricably linked to GP-WRITE. Pfizer had no problems telling you were they were going with 'gene therapy' in 2016 (below). Imagine if evil motives were involved https://pfizer.com/news/press-release/press-release-detail/kings-college-london-signs-licence-and-research-agreement https://www.pfizer.com/news/press-release/press-release-detail/kings-college-london-signs-licence-and-research-agreement

King’s College London signs licence and research agreement with Pfizer Inc. in the field of gene therapy | Pfizer King’s College London has announced that it has recently entered into an exclusive license agreement with Pfizer Inc. for the development of a series of adeno-associated virus (AAV) gene therapy vectors. pfizer.com

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

Maybe PFIZER realised quickly that 'LNPs' had greater transduction abilities? MODERNA had that mode from Harvard-MIT and Langer. Moderna was chosen by CEPI for funding mRNA. delayed their mRNA LNP delivery systems?? https://twitter.com/KeithEv84928885/status/1597554289807101952?t=4andNJ92_2utDgoMpdu47g&s=19…

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

Reminder: The Obama "Brain Initiative". Transduction by the LNPs into the Place of the Skull. Funded by CEPI (the WEF) and technology funded by DARPA from Harvard-MIT https://twitter.com/KeithEv84928885/status/1596404065025806336?t=L5ApIrzAiNsxVH_5y6w_jA&s=19…

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

The LNPs help transduction. Four LNPs were included in the Moderna Vx funded by CEPI and DARPA. What they didn't want revealed contemporaneously was that it was 'Gene Therapy'. Zhang is pioneer Brain Research Harvard-MIT https://fiercebiotech.com/research/crispr-pioneer-feng-zhang-s-latest-work-delivers-mrna-gene-therapy-human-protein https://patents.justia.com/patent/10702600#description… https://www.fiercebiotech.com/research/crispr-pioneer-feng-zhang-s-latest-work-delivers-mrna-gene-therapy-human-protein https://patents.justia.com/patent/10702600#description

CRISPR pioneer Feng Zhang's latest work delivers mRNA, gene therapy with a human protein COVID-19 mRNA vaccines and existing gene therapies, including those built with the CRISPR-Cas9 gene-editing tool, are delivered into cells with viral vectors or lipid nanoparticle fiercebiotech.com
US Patent for Betacoronavirus mRNA vaccine Patent (Patent # 10,702,600 issued July 7, 2020) - Justia Patents Search The disclosure relates to respiratory virus ribonucleic acid (RNA) vaccines and combination vaccines, as well as methods of using the vaccines and compositions comprising the vaccines. patents.justia.com

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

Feng Zhang (above) was to speak at the MIT inspired 4th International Conference on "Proteins & Peptides" including Robert Langer. Huanming Yang of blacklisted US DOD ( BGI) was also to speak. It was cancelled on the 22nd March 2022 (See below) https://proteins-peptides.org/about/ https://proteins-peptides.org/about/

About – Proteins & Peptides Conference 2023 proteins-peptides.org

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

Prof Jef Boeke of Tessera Therapeutics (colleague of Prof. George Church at GP-WRITE) knows Huanming Yang (BGI) well, as does Harvard-MIT. Genetic Engineering using 'Yeast' to Store Large DNA for Cloning https://twitter.com/KeithEv84928885/status/1597537382710247424?t=7Ss_uzf4F4YR4Elf2W_Urg&s=19…

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

Langer (MIT) and Noubar Afeyan (WEF) were Co-founders of MODERNA. Here's the SEC filing by Moderna on Dec 4th 2018. DARPA included. They were NOT sure about the Tech and the LNPs?? https://sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1682852/000119312518341958/d611137ds1a.htm https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1682852/000119312518341958/d611137ds1a.htm

Webmaster Frequently Asked Questions sec.gov

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

With MODERNA allied to MERCK, and MERCK to State asset, US DOD blacklisted, 'BGI', it's easy to realise that scientists had access to very significant genetic data. BGI were trusted. Unfortunately, they were affiliated to the 'WIV' and the PLA https://twitter.com/KeithEv84928885/status/1590683493809672193?t=8ixc3z7QDnJY2fM7cyF0vw&s=19…

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

Chinese scientists and BGI definitely had the technology. How far the western Deep State collusion went is another question? However, the WEF and sections of the US Admin, have a lot of questions to answer?? Zhejiang University had a BW facility. Facts https://twitter.com/KeithEv84928885/status/1599421452981526530?t=VY0eNqRIvEfyYtjZa6yVrw&s=19…

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

Early days of Zhejiang University: BGI and the James D Watson Genomic Lab. Huanming Yang (BGI) is head of the Lab at Zhijiang Campus formed in 2003 👇

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

Of course, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, USA, does have its Asia counterpart, "CSHL Asia", founded by themselves, with supervisors Huanming Yang (BGI), Hong Ma (Fudan University), and including the Rockefeller University https://meetings.cshl.edu/CSHAsia/governance.html https://meetings.cshl.edu/CSHAsia/governance.html

CSH Asia Governance meetings.cshl.edu

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

Huanming Yang (BGI) and Zhejiang University however does have another history in studying Pathogens like SARS and bat Coronaviruses from Zhoushan with the PLA https://twitter.com/KeithEv84928885/status/1598337241494994952?t=R3zV8VVNFdSOZ9zOyJrKAA&s=19…

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

SARS S Protein (Codon Optimised) and cDNA Plasmids from Beijing CDC 2004 👇

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

Huanming Yang (BGI) and the 🇨🇳 PLA: BJ01 SARS isolate, courtesy of Zhejiang University (ZHU) 🤔👇

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

A Brief History of Coronavirus affiliations at Wuhan: 1. Guiqing Peng (Uni of M.sota, 2012) now Huazhong Agricultural University (HZAU) Wuhan; and affiliate, Ralph Baric. The 2nd Paper received on Oct 23rd 2019 https://jstor.org/stable/41829791 https://journals.plos.org/plospathogens/article?id=10.1371/journal.ppat.1008392… https://www.jstor.org/stable/41829791 https://journals.plos.org/plospathogens/article?id=10.1371/journal.ppat.1008392

JSTOR: Access Check JSTOR is a digital library of academic journals, books, and primary sources. jstor.org
Structure of mouse coronavirus spike protein complexed with receptor reveals mechanism for viral entry Author summary Coronaviruses recognize many receptors using their envelope-anchored spike protein. The role of receptor binding in coronavirus entry into host cells is a fundamental question in virology. Mouse hepatitis coronavirus (MHV) is unique among all coronaviruses in that it uses the N-terminal domain (NTD) of its spike protein to bind a protein receptor CEACAM1a. While extensive research has been performed on the cell entry mechanisms of coronaviruses that use a different domain of their spike protein for receptor binding, the cell entry mechanism for MHV is still elusive. Here we determined the cryo-EM structure of MHV spike protein complexed with CEACAM1a. The structure reveals unique features of receptor binding by MHV spike that facilitate the structural changes of MHV spike and promote cell entry of MHV. We further confirmed the structural results with biochemical and negative-stain EM analyses. These results suggest that receptor binding plays dual roles in MHV entry: it promotes both viral attachment to host cells and the fusion of host and viral membranes. Our study provides insight into the molecular mechanism of MHV entry, demonstrating how cell entry of MHV has been adapted to its unique way of receptor binding. journals.plos.org

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

2. Prof. Guiqing Peng (above) also worked with 'Prof. Qigai He', also of HZAU (Wuhan), on S Proteins from Coronaviruses dated 26th Nov 2015 👇 https://virosin.org/en/article/doi/10.1007/s12250-015-3690-4

Comparison of lentiviruses pseudotyped with S proteins from coronaviruses and cell tropisms of porcine coronaviruses The surface glycoproteins of coronaviruses play an important role in receptor binding and cell entry. Different coronaviruses interact with their specific receptors to enter host cells. Lentiviruses pseudotyped with their spike proteins (S) were compared to analyze the entry efficiency of various coronaviruses. Our results indicated that S proteins from different coronaviruses displayed varied abilities to mediate pseudotyped virus infection. Furthermore, the cell tropisms of porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV) and transmissible gastroenteritis virus (TGEV) have been characterized by live and pseudotyped viruses. Both live and pseudoviruses could infected Vero- CCL-81 (monkey kidney), Huh-7 (human liver), and PK-15 (pig kidney) cells efficiently. CCL94 (cat kidney) cells could be infected efficiently by TGEV but not PEDV. Overall, our study provides new insights into the mechanisms of viral entry and forms a basis for antiviral drug screening. virosin.org

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

3. By 2016, 'Prof. Qigai He' (HZAU) Wuhan had already inserted a "FCS" into a Coronavirus S Protein, and was also using Crispr-Cas9, recognising its potential in both DNA and RNA viruses https://journals.asm.org/doi/epub/10.1128/JVI.00356-15 https://nature.com/articles/srep19176#Fig2… https://journals.asm.org/doi/epub/10.1128/JVI.00356-15 https://www.nature.com/articles/srep19176#Fig2

A CRISPR/Cas9 and Cre/Lox system-based express vaccine development strategy against re-emerging Pseudorabies virus - Scientific Reports Virus evolves rapidly to escape vaccine-induced immunity, posing a desperate demand for efficient vaccine development biotechnologies. Here we present an express vaccine development strategy based on CRISPR/Cas9 and Cre/Lox system against re-emerging Pseudorabies virus, which caused the recent devastating swine pseudorabies outbreak in China. By CRISPR/Cas9 system, the virulent genes of the newly isolated strain were simultaneously substituted by marker genes, which were subsequently excised using Cre/Lox system for vaccine safety concern. Notably, single cell FACS technology was applied to further promote virus purification efficiency. The combination of these state-of-art technologies greatly accelerated vaccine development. Finally, vaccination and challenge experiments proved this vaccine candidate’s protective efficacy in pigs and the promise to control current pseudorabies outbreak. This is, to our knowledge, the first successful vaccine development based on gene edit technologies, demonstrating these technologies leap from laboratory to industry. It may pave the way for future express antiviral vaccine development. nature.com

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

4. HZAU (Wuhan), to which 'Prof. Qigai He' was affiliated, was also visited by the Consortium Seq. Head of "Wu-Hu-1" 'Prof. Zhang Yong-Zhen' just prior to its Seq release?? BGI were part of that Consortium. Never underestimate 'Agricultural Colleges' https://twitter.com/KeithEv84928885/status/1534899057285529601?t=2SnZJ5TBtj10MJc-3htS-Q&s=19…

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

5. Interestingly, Prof Qigai He of 'HZAU' also produced 'Infectious Clones' of Deltacoronaviruses? Maybe under the, 'No conflict of interests' Declaration below, he needed to include the AMMS, as nothing produced in China got passed their utilisation https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6968670/#__ffn_sectitle… https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6968670/#__ffn_sectitle

Genetic manipulation of porcine deltacoronavirus reveals insights into NS6 and NS7 functions: a novel strategy for vaccine design Porcine deltacoronavirus (PDCoV) is an emerging swine coronavirus that causes severe diarrhea, resulting in high mortality in neonatal piglets. Despite widespread outbreaks in many countries, no effective PDCoV vaccines are currently available. Here, ... ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

The Infectious Clone produced at the State Key Laboratory (HZAU) by 'Prof Qigai He' was as a vaccine strategy for a (PD-COV) from 2017. Any of the several cDNA fragments could quite easily have been incorporated into another COV Clone? All COVs have conserved regions

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

Fang Li (University of Minnesota) was associated with both Prof. 'Guiqing Peng' of HZAU (associate of 'Prof. Qigai He' above), but also to Shi Zhengli 👇 https://t.co/rhbYT8y8Sg

@KeithEv84928885 - Keith Evans

Both 'Fang Li' and 'Prof. Guiqing Peng' had performed GOF on the RBD of SARS (2012), as evidenced by Ralph Baric, an associate of both 👇 https://t.co/96UDVviAKG

Saved - January 28, 2025 at 3:36 AM

@AlonsoFloCor - Alonso Flores

2 days I had the chance to co-host an awesome Biosecurity session along with Michelle Bruno at #EAGxLatAm !! Thanks to our speakers @ByronCohenMA and Chelsea I’Anson for such amazing presentations!! https://t.co/QCy3zxLlJ9

Saved - October 5, 2023 at 1:40 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The PfizerBioNTech vaccine trial involved over 44,000 participants, but only 250 received doses made with a new manufacturing method. The safety and efficacy comparison of these doses has not been published. Variability in the production process of mRNA vaccines may impact their effectiveness and safety. Bacterial DNA contamination and serious adverse events have been reported. The need to understand production process variability is crucial. The study did not compare the two production processes adequately. The potential risks of DNA and endotoxin contamination are concerning. Further research and transparency are necessary.

@joshg99 - Josh Guetzkow

Was the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine clinical trial a bait-and-switch? There were >44,000 people in the trial, but only ~250 of them were given doses made with a new manufacturing method ('process 2') that was used to make enough doses to sell around the world.

@joshg99 - Josh Guetzkow

To our knowledge, the safety and efficacy comparison they planned to do with those 250 subjects has never been published and has not been released in the FOIA'd documents that Pfizer submitted to the FDA. Was the comparison ever done? Where are the results?

@joshg99 - Josh Guetzkow

@RetsefL and I explore the importance of this comparison and the potential impact of variability in the the production process of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines on efficacy and safety in a newly published rapid response in the @bmj_latest. https://www.bmj.com/content/378/bmj.o1731/rr-2

Effect of mRNA Vaccine Manufacturing Processes on Efficacy and Safety Still an Open Question bmj.com

@joshg99 - Josh Guetzkow

Keep in mind that one of the major changes in the new production process was using bacterial cDNA to upscale production of mRNA. @Kevin_McKernan's analysis of vaccine vials found unacceptably high levels of leftover bacterial DNA. https://www.rebelnews.com/genomics_expert_discovers_concerning_contents_in_covid_vaccine_vials

Genomics expert discovers concerning contents in COVID vaccine vials Former research and development leader at the Human Genome Project has taken citizen science into his own hands to learn more about what exactly lurks in the vials of the novel COVID-19 injections. rebelnews.com

@joshg99 - Josh Guetzkow

Pfizer's 6-month report to the FDA doesn't include the process 2 comparison, but it does show a significantly higher serious adverse event rate in placebo subjects after they were given the vaccine compared to the original vaccine group, "as expected." Why was it expected?

@joshg99 - Josh Guetzkow

We know from FOIA'd documents that about 70% of the trial sites received new batches with distinct Pfizer lot numbers after Nov. 19. Were these intended for the crossover placebo subjects? Were they different than the doses given to the original treatment group? And if so, how?

@joshg99 - Josh Guetzkow

In addition, a recent Danish study found significant variability in the rate of serious adverse events across 52 different lots of Comirnaty. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eci.13998

@joshg99 - Josh Guetzkow

Taken together, evidence from trial documents and existing research underscores the need to better understand the potential impact of variability in the production process of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines on efficacy and safety.

@joshg99 - Josh Guetzkow

I forgot to add: The two process 2 lots sent to 8 trial sites were also given to the public. There are 1,149 reports in VAERS for these lots, including 307 serious adverse events and 23 deaths.

@joshg99 - Josh Guetzkow

This thread is also highly relevant to manufacturing standards and batch toxicity:

@Jikkyleaks - Jikkyleaks 🐭

HOLY CHEESE 🧀🧀🧀 I have discovered something that should lead to the immediate investigation of the TGA and every drug regulator Two FOIs prove that there were batches of #Pfizer vaccine that had killed people and should have failed the batch analysis. But they kept jabbing.

@joshg99 - Josh Guetzkow

Somebody asked if study C4591017 was the process 2 comparison trial: https://clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/trial/2021-005903-11/results It isn't though it does compare 5 (unidentified) lots & found a 2x rate of subjects experiencing at least one AE and AEs judged related to the vaccine in one lot & variation in SAEs.

@joshg99 - Josh Guetzkow

In case it isn't clear, the 2 production processes were radically different and yielded different quality products! You can't just test it on 250 people and say it's all the same. They could not be assumed to be bio-similar, like name-brand and generic.

@joshg99 - Josh Guetzkow

@joshg99 - Josh Guetzkow

My 30 min. discussion with Dr. Paul Thomas on the Pfizer/BioNTech COVID vaccine bait-and-switch is live! Starts 5:30. Second half of video is an interview of Paul about his book, The Vaccine-Friendly Plan & how his views have changed since he wrote it. https://rumble.com/v2sp3wa-bait-and-switch-with-josh-guetzkow.html

Bait-and-Switch With Josh Guetzkow Josh Guetzkow, this week’s guest, is an investigative journalist. In this episode of ‘With the Wind,’ he explains Pfizer’s BioNTech COVID vaccine clinical trial bait-and-switch scheme and its effects rumble.com

@joshg99 - Josh Guetzkow

@joshg99 - Josh Guetzkow

"No one could have given informed consent because the public were mislead." MP @ABridgen posed a question today in parliament about the Pfizer/BioNTech Comirnaty clinical trial "bait and switch" that @RetsefL and I highlighted in our recent BMJ rapid response. 1/4

Video Transcript AI Summary
Andrew Bridgeman raises concerns about the Pfizer COVID vaccine rollout, citing evidence from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. He claims that the vaccine used in the rollout was not the same as the one trialed on volunteers and approved for emergency use. Bridgeman suggests that if ministers were unaware of this, it could be a criminal act by the MHRA. He argues that the public was misled, leading to a discrepancy between Pfizer's data and the UK's yellow card data on adverse events. Bridgeman requests a statement from the government on this matter.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Andrew Bridgeman. Madam Deputy Speaker, evidence has now emerged from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem that the Pfizer COVID vaccine rollout across the world was not the same nor was it manufactured in the same way as the vaccine trialed on 44,000 volunteers and subsequently adequately given emergency use approval. If ministers were unaware of this, then potentially the MHRA has has committed a criminal act. Madam deputy speaker, no one could have given informed consent because the public were misled. And this also explains the huge difference between the Pfizer data and our own yellow card data with regard to adverse events. Can we have a statement from the government at their earliest convenience?

@joshg99 - Josh Guetzkow

This article has excellent coverage of this issue. It also points out the fact that the manufacturer was never required to test process 2 jabs on lab animals. Or at least we've never seen results of such tests. https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/how-hancock-and-the-fiercely-independent-mhra-helped-pfizer-game-the-vaccine-approval-process/

How Hancock and the ‘fiercely independent’ MHRA recklessly rolled out a vaccine tested on only 500 people - The Conservative Woman How Hancock and the ‘fiercely independent’ MHRA recklessly rolled out a vaccine tested on only 500 people conservativewoman.co.uk

@joshg99 - Josh Guetzkow

Genomics expert, professor @P_J_Buckhaults U of South Carolina, testifies on the potential risks of the DNA contamination he found in vials of mRNA vaccine entirely that was entirely due to the switch to process 2. https://x.com/TheChiefNerd/status/1703544942004478251

@joshg99 - Josh Guetzkow

However I suspect that the endotoxin contamination is likely a bigger problem, both because it is probably a major factor in many adverse events and because it is basically impossible to purify. For more on endotoxin risks: https://geoffpain.substack.com/

Geoff Pain PhD | GeoffPainPhD | Substack Tromethamine aka Tris, THAM and many other names is biologically active. Click to read Geoff Pain PhD, by GeoffPainPhD, a Substack publication with thousands of subscribers. geoffpain.substack.com

@joshg99 - Josh Guetzkow

See this thread for a further update showing that Pfizer/BioNTech never did the planned study comparing process 2 v 1 for safety and immunogenicity: https://x.com/joshg99/status/1705177305499279525

@joshg99 - Josh Guetzkow

A professor and expert in cancer genetics at U of South Carolina testifies on risks posed by process 2 jabs due to the plasmid DNA contamination: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IEWHhrHiiTY

@joshg99 - Josh Guetzkow

And a transcript of his interview with Maryanne Demasi: https://maryannedemasi.substack.com/p/exclusive-an-interview-with-buckhaults

EXCLUSIVE: An interview with Buckhaults about DNA contamination in covid vaccines... and the FDA responds Earlier this year, genomics expert Kevin McKernan first discovered DNA contamination in vials of Pfizer and Moderna’s bivalent booster shots. He published his findings in a pre-print, but the research received little attention from the mainstream media. maryannedemasi.substack.com

@joshg99 - Josh Guetzkow

Great talk by @hedleyrees discussing the intricacies and challenges of biologic drug manufacturing: https://rumble.com/v3fqujk-challenges-in-manufacturing-and-distributing-products-derived-from-biologic.html

Challenges in manufacturing and distributing products derived from biologics | Hedley Rees The pharmaceutical industry was founded on small molecule products, where active ingredients were manufactured by fine chemical companies using long-established industrial processing. That meant the f rumble.com
Saved - October 22, 2023 at 9:36 AM

@Jo_Bond - Jo Bond❤️

Dr Peter McCullough testified in the European Parliament in Strasbourg which was chaired by Christine Anderson. Watch below! @P_McCulloughMD@AndersonAfDMdEP@EU_Commission@EUparliament #CourageousDiscourse #McCulloughFnd http://www.mcculloughfnd.org

McCullough Foundation Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH Fighting for medical freedom through scientific data and analysis. mcculloughfnd.org
Saved - September 14, 2023 at 10:14 PM

@ZippoJeje - Jérôme F...🌟

💥 Qui a construit Klaus Schwab et son World Économic Forum? Qui sont ses 3 mentors? Portrait 1/2 https://t.co/E5y2nyElcD

Video Transcript AI Summary
Director Klaus Schwab's mentors were influential figures in America's thermonuclear deterrence program and proponents of a one world government. Henry Kissinger, who focused on global governance and depopulation, recruited Schwab at the Harvard International Seminar. Kissinger played a major role in the Council on Foreign Relations and conducted psychological operations involving nuclear weapons. Economist John P. Galbraith, who studied land policies under Hitler's government, helped Schwab establish the World Economic Forum. Galbraith also evaluated the economic effects of wartime bombing and visited Hiroshima and Nagasaki after the nuclear attacks. In 1968, Galbraith joined Kissinger in pursuing a one world government and introduced Schwab to Herman Kahn, who proposed training global leaders, leading to the creation of the World Economic Forum's Young Global Leaders. Both Kissinger and Galbraith were involved in the thermonuclear religion.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And director Klaus Schwab's 3 mentors were the most influential people in America's thermonuclear deterrence program, as well as leading proponents of a one world government. Henry Kissinger recruited Klaus Schwab at the Harvard International Seminar, which was funded by the CIA. During this time, Kissinger was focused on global governance and depopulation. But it was with the Council on Foreign Relations that Kissinger became a major player. By Wargaming psychological operations involving America's growing thermonuclear weapons arsenal and writing the book on nuclear weapons and foreign policy. John p Galbraith was a highly influential economist who helped Klaus Schwab create the World Economic Forum. Galbraith was an economist at Harvard who traveled to Germany in 1938 to study land policies under Hitler's National Socialist government. From there, he went to work on an advisory committee for FDR's New Deal. After World War 2 ended, his work shifted into nuclear weapons. Galbraith was tasked with evaluating the overall economic effects of the wartime bombing, he interrogated Nazi war criminal, Albert Speer, and was sent to Hiroshima and Nagasaki to evaluate the damage caused by the nuclear weapons attack. By 1968, Galbraith had joined Kissinger in his pursuit of a one world government. And it was during this time that Kissinger introduced Galbraith to Klaus Schwab, along with Herman Kahn, who in 1967 suggested subverting democracy by training a select group of global leaders, which later became the World Economic Forum's Young Global Leaders. Both Kissinger and Galbraith were heavily involved in the religion of thermonuclear

@ZippoJeje - Jérôme F...🌟

2/2 https://t.co/sucPCFVyew

Video Transcript AI Summary
Dr. Strangelove, Khan, and Galbraith played significant roles in the development of nuclear deterrence and the push for a European Union. Klaus Schwab, the founder of the World Economic Forum, merged his father's nuclear weapons company and illegally built nuclear weapons for South Africa. The Club of Rome's publication in 1972 introduced the idea of depopulation, which gained international attention when Schwab invited the founder to speak at the World Economic Forum. Despite controversy, the forum gained support from powerful elites. The author suggests that Schwab's supervillain persona is a deliberate marketing tactic. The World Economic Forum is believed to be nearing its maximum expansion before an eventual collapse, as people will eventually resist. However, the forum seems more focused on depopulation and thermonuclear war.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Doctor Strangelove. Khan wrote the official military policy on nuclear deterrence and believed that if everyone had nuclear weapons, the world would know peace. By the late sixties, Khan was pushing for a European Union and joined Galbraith in 1970 on a European speaking tour to support Klaus Schwab's recruitment drive for the 1st European management symposium, now known as the World Economic Forum. And while they were doing that. Klaus Schwab helped merge his father's nuclear weapons company into a company that he then directed to illegally build nuclear weapons for the South African government. In 1972, the Club of Rome published The Limits to Growth, which planted the seeds of the depopulation agenda. And while Kahn, Kissinger, and Galbraith helped Schwab get started, what really brought him the international a port he was hoping for was when he introduced the ideas of depopulation. In 1972, the Club of Rome's founder was invited by Schwab to make the keynote speech in 1973. As controversial as it was, even Herman Kahn opposed it, the World Economic Forum suddenly caught the tension and financial support of powerful elitists everywhere and blew up to what it has become today. The article suggests that Schwab's supervillain persona is a deliberate marketing tactic to gain the attention from those who seek power and wealth to join Klaus Schwab as stakeholders in society. The author believes that the World Economic Forum is reaching its maximum level of expansion before its inevitable collapse. Because eventually, people will fight back. But they already know that. And all they really seem to care about is world in depopulation and thermonuclear war. Reporting for info
Saved - September 14, 2023 at 10:17 PM

@gunthertree2 - Blake 🔮

For those wondering, this was from the following event:

@AndersonAfDMdEP - Christine Anderson

🇨🇦 🇺🇸 🇬🇧 🇦🇺 Expert Hearing in the EU Parliament 13.09.2023 / 14:30 - 16:30 (CET) The WHO - with its pursuit of ever more power and increased funding - is the central driver of "pandemic emergencies" as well as the undemocratic shift of political decisions to unelected,…

Saved - October 6, 2023 at 6:53 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The ESWI's relationship with the WHO has been questioned before. In 2010, an editorial raised concerns about their connections. The ESWI has been involved in pandemic preparedness committees, and key members were part of secretive emergency committees. The ESWI is funded by big pharma and has close ties to Vaccines Europe. They have influenced the WHO's pandemic plans and even prepared materials for GPs. The ESWI's independence is questionable. They have been involved in vaccine promotion and dealing with vaccine misinformation. The European Vaccine Initiative and the British Consulate-General Barcelona are also connected to the ESWI. The ESWI's influence extends to the European Union and they have initiated the European Influenza Task Force.

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

It appears the ESWI has been in the limelight before. In 2010, the @bmj_latest released an editorial penned by @deb_cohen and Philip Carter, calling into question the cosy relationship between ESWI connected experts and the @WHO .

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

In fact, they came to much the same conclusions, about the likes of Osterhaus, which I reached independently. However, they drilled more into detail in some aspects.

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

However, late in the article, they reveal that Dr Monto, John Wood, and Masato Tashiro were on a secretive emergency committee, relating to pandemic preparedness.

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

... and it's in that regard, I previously tweeted this. Because John Wood was a member of the ESWI just as well.

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

Oh what do we find here on ESWI's website? It's John Wood. Listed as a member. web.archive.org/web/2001022122…

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

I furthermore wish to draw attention to a few additional things, which I located @WHO, @deb_cohen and @bmj_latest - A pandemic plan was discussed already in 1993, here, per ESWI -

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

This took place 30 years ago. 1993. 'planning for an influenza pandemic in Europe' This one is legitimately crazy. For how long has this been planned? <continues>

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

@WHO @deb_cohen @bmj_latest However, I also located that Ab Osterhaus worked as part of the team who 'discovered' H5N1 in Hong Kong, 1997.

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

The 1999 WHO Pandemic Plan was written by big pharma lobbying outfit, which planned the entire thing already in 1994. This plan was integrated with national plans, including the 2001 UK one. Absolutely fully sourced, and absolutely corrupt to hell and back. link in next tweet

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

@WHO @deb_cohen @bmj_latest ... and they also worked on a pandemic plan - which the WHO released as their own in 1999

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

The Covid-19 sample-to-vaccine path looks rather a lot like this, taken from a now-removed 1999 document released by the WHO. also from same report - 'DNA vaccines represent another possibility that could provide large numbers of doses in a short time'

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

Now, back then, an organisation by the name of 'European Vaccine Manufacturers' existed. Founded in 1991, as opposed to 1992 in the case of ESWI. They renamed to 'Vaccines Europe'. And they released this, only recently.

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

This should not be legal. Vaccines Europe - which is a big pharma lobby organisation - 'Our mission for the 2024 EU elections. An EU Immunisation Strategy for an innovative, healthy and prosperous Europe' My blood is slowly starting to boil

Vaccines Europe Vaccines Europe, is a specialised vaccines group within the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations (EFPIA), the professional association of the innovative pharmaceutical industry in Europe. vaccineseurope.eu

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

However, zip back around 20 years ago - and we find that 5 of 7 of the big pharma cos funding the ESWI... ALSO FUNDED THE 'EUROPEAN VACCINE MANUFACTURERS'

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

'European Vaccine Manufacturers' website of 2003 is here. The mission statement sounds... a lot like what ESWI are up to. A lot. 'promote a favourable climate for expanded vaccine protection and improved vaccine coverage in Europe'

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

@WHO @deb_cohen @bmj_latest Now, two things. Osterhaus. Here's what he had to say about H5N1 back in the day.

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

H5N1 is not real, episode 3. Honestly. And this is 'science'? Penned by Osterhaus, too, who was central in H5N1. - 'the virus was tentatively classified as H5N1' 'avian reservoir was considered the most likely explanation' 'contact with infected birds at local live poultry…

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

@WHO @deb_cohen @bmj_latest And here's the ESWI''s recent conference. 'Independent' ESWI, that is. Always recommending vaccines. COMPLETELY COINCIDENTAL THAT THEY'RE FUNDED BY BIG PHARMA

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

So, yeah, as said, the ESWI is completely independent and not beholden in ANY way to those vaccine producing big pharma co's who provide funding. Where did you get that crazy idea from anyway? Also their recent 2023 conference was a stellar success.

The Ninth ESWI Influenza Conference: Highlights | ESWI ESWI 2023: 10 key take home messages eswi.org

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

@WHO @deb_cohen @bmj_latest It's utterly laughable to suggest the ESWI are 'independent'

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

See? It clearly states 'independent'. Right there, above the financial backers, all of which are vaccine manufacturers. Hence, the ESWI is 'independent'. Otherwise they wouldn't have added 'independent'.

| ESWI We are scientists fighting the burden of major acute respiratory virus infections by fostering stakeholder communication and cross-disciplinary research in Europe. eswi.org

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

In 2021, in fact, 'Vaccines Europe' was specifically listed as a partner organisation on ESWI's site.

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

Quick trip to 2021 Partner organisations Vaccines Europe https://web.archive.org/web/20210227193941/https://eswi.org/home/about-eswi/partner-organizations/

Partner organizations - ESWI Organization web.archive.org

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

@WHO @deb_cohen @bmj_latest ... where they in fact remain to this day. https://eswi.org/site/networks/coalition-partners

| ESWI We are scientists fighting the burden of major acute respiratory virus infections by fostering stakeholder communication and cross-disciplinary research in Europe. eswi.org

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

And, as said, Vaccines Europe is merely a rebranding exercise.

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

Early (2013) cache of their page. That's a lobbying organisation for big pharma (!) web.archive.org/web/2013052216…

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

... and can I also throw in that the WHO adopted more than just the ESWI's work on the influenza pandemic plan?

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

oh golly, and in the same month as big Pharma's meet with the WHO, the latter adopt ESWI's flu vax distribution monitoring system! web.archive.org/web/2004112801…

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

They have even worked on dealing with 'misinformation about vaccines' 15 years ago!

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

Unintentional comedy 'Misconceptions on influenza vaccination' Download the self-extracting file (130 MB) Run the file INFLUENZA.EXE

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

@WHO @deb_cohen @bmj_latest May I also add that the ESWI were 'external experts' dealing with the ECDC in 2005.

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

@RWMaloneMD The ECDC is located @ Karolinska. And in 2005, the ECDC made public that scientific input is taken from the ESWI, which is a big pharma lobby group that loves a good vaccine. https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/media/en/publications/Publications/355_ECDC_Directors%20Report%20Executive%20Summary.pdf

Page not found The requested page or file cannot be found ecdc.europa.eu

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

... and that Osterhaus is shilling vaccines to pregnant women and infants...

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

Keynote: What is our global maternal & infant RSV Intervention strategy? There he is again. Ab Osterhaus. Selling vaccines to infants. And the ESWI is supposed to be impartial? FO! it's a raging big pharma lobbying outfit.

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

... in 10 days time from now!

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

Only 11 days. The World Vaccine Congress.

World Vaccine Congress Europe 2023 | 16 - 19 October 2023 The region’s largest event dedicated to vaccine business, science and technology development terrapinn.com

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

@WHO @deb_cohen @bmj_latest The event is brought to you by the European Vaccine Initiative...

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

Sponsored by... the European Vaccine Initiative (who brought you the 36-day course to become a vax developer) ... the British Consulate-General Barcelona?????

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

@WHO @deb_cohen @bmj_latest ... who were actively involved in the insane 36-days-to-become-a-vax-developer course sponsored by the EU

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

It's about TransVac. It's about vaccine development. It's about the European Vaccine Initiative. And it's to protect you. Link to follow in next tweet.

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

@WHO @deb_cohen @bmj_latest Right, I think that should be enough to start with. Here's my follow-up substack.

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

H5N1 - Part tWHO

H5N1 - Part tWHO In the event it wasn’t completely clear, because I accept that I’m not a wordsmith, yesterday’s article details the below. H5N1 was as genuine as liberal tolerance In addition to the horrendous culling, it was furthermore used to push through surveillance and poultry vaccines - ie One Health - for livestock escapekey.substack.com

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

@WHO @deb_cohen @bmj_latest And here's a timeline I put together relating to the chronological absurdity that is the H5N1 https://t.co/yhBmzFnjaH

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

In 1998, Margaret Chan and Ken Shortridge received the Prince Mahidol Award for their 'contribution towards the work in eradicating the avian flu' I've written on this, and I'm convinced that 1997 H5N1 isn't real. Now even more >> https://t.co/yfn2F3shXu https://t.co/DiXUA3N667

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

Oh actually, let me loop in a few people like @thackerpd , @NickHudsonCT @Jikkyleaks @Fynnderella1 @DrJBhattacharya @IamBrookJackson - start from linked tweet 19 VIEWS IN 35 MINUTES???? SERIOUSLY throttled here. https://t.co/HshcErD48c

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

It appears the ESWI has been in the limelight before. In 2010, the @bmj_latest released an editorial penned by @deb_cohen and Philip Carter, calling into question the cosy relationship between ESWI connected experts and the @WHO . <continues> https://t.co/5j5gBrBKdq

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

@WHO @deb_cohen @bmj_latest @thackerpd @NickHudsonCT @Jikkyleaks @Fynnderella1 @DrJBhattacharya @IamBrookJackson and for that alone, you corrupt mo'fos', I am going to continue. quick peek at their 2000 conference. yes 2000. https://t.co/7eTIfbtjXd

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

Conveniently summed by workshops. Yeah, could be coincidence, but @Fynnderella1, I have seen so many amazing coincidences Surveillance could mean anything, but national pandemic plans, zoonotics (One Health), genetic manipulation, vaccines, ... web.archive.org/web/2000082911… https://t.co/mrr39z2trr

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

or how about this 'The WHO's Influenza Pandemic Preparedness Plan was developed in close collaboration with ESWI.'

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

'ESWI will prepare a leaflet on influenza for GPs' since when was it ESWI's job to prepare material for general practitioners? that seems incredibly unethical https://t.co/fUsP20CMPG

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

And here I thought that'd be the job of the national health systems, or the WHO. Silly me - ESWI and the WHO are entirely interchangeable. https://t.co/XY7iwgs4L4

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

or how about this amusement, also from the ESWI's bulletins WHAT COULD IT BE? https://t.co/Xb3k33SjMi

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

What could it be? It is a mystery. I fear we may never know the answer. 1998 edition @Wood_House76 web.archive.org/web/2001022302… https://t.co/Y1ZqAb9mi2

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

so, yeah - answers on a postcard. hey, WHO - was it something SAFE AND EFFECTIVE [2002]? https://t.co/Meb8UDMeUy

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

WHO 26 November 2002 Influenza Safe and effective. Somewhat surprised by this document, because the earliest I'd tracked the 'plan' was around the 2004 mark. But here we are, 2 years prior. It's a sales schpiel for vaccines and surveillance. https://t.co/hSGGDZfWit https://t.co/zomIFPHLBp

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

@WHO @deb_cohen @bmj_latest @thackerpd @NickHudsonCT @Jikkyleaks @Fynnderella1 @DrJBhattacharya @IamBrookJackson It would appear they also control the European Union https://t.co/iJi9y9O5Dl

@_Escapekey_ - _Esc

So the ESWI - per own bulletin - initiated the European Influenza Task Force? https://t.co/cTr8rmZU9t https://t.co/k9FiDpJB86

Saved - November 17, 2023 at 3:58 AM

@MurfittTauranga - Kirsten Murfitt

Do you have questions about the conflict of interests and how online question of vaccines relates to the proposed United Nations Convention of Cybercrime? The UN concluding session is to be held early next year https://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/cybercrime/ad_hoc_committee/ahc_concluding_session/main (links below)

Concluding session of the Ad Hoc Committee Concluding session of the Ad Hoc Committee unodc.org
Saved - November 20, 2023 at 8:29 PM

@iluminatibot - illuminatibot

The real Klaus Schwab https://t.co/KtGuK6gjY6

Video Transcript AI Summary
This video discusses the World Economic Forum (WEF) and its founder, Klaus Schwab. The WEF is an international private organization that brings together world leaders, business executives, celebrities, and influencers in Davos, Switzerland. The WEF has been criticized for its influence on global politics and its ability to shape the future. Klaus Schwab has called for a "great reset" to address urgent issues, but some see this as a push for a one-world government and a digital currency controlled by central banks. The video raises concerns about Schwab's background and his role in South Africa's nuclear weapons program during apartheid.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Some people would say this revolution is characterized by the fight of robots against human beings and we will win this fight. Speaker 1: Professor Klaus Schwab was born in 1938 in Ravensburg, Germany, Where Nazi crimes against humanity were committed. His father, Eugene Wilhelm Schwab, was the managing director of Escher Weiss Ravensburg. A company that used slave labor to manufacture weapons of war for the Third Reich. While Klaus' father was at the helm, The Nazi party awarded Escher Weiss Ravensburg the title of National Socialist Model Company. Years later, Klaus Schwab joined the board of directors at Esher Weiss Ravensburg, where he played a key role in the development of South Africa's nuclear weapons program During the darkest years of the racist apartheid regime. Today, Klaus Schwab is the founder and executive chairman of the World Economic Forum. Speaker 2: If you'd like to meet the people who are supposed to repair the state of the world or give a piece of your mind to the bankers who helped get us into this mess. We can tell you where to find a lot of them. The World Economic Forum. Speaker 1: Founded in 1971, The World Economic Forum is an international private organization which receives 1,000,000,000 of tax free dollars from its members and their global enterprises. Every year, the WEF brings together its members with world leaders, Big Pharma executives, tech titans, Hollywood celebrities, Media personalities and Internet influencers to meet in the secluded mountains of Davos, Switzerland. Speaker 2: It is a tiny town folded into the Swiss Alps, a village where you could bump into Bill Clinton, Bill Gates, see The head of Google and the queen of Jordan all in one place. A lot of reporters cover the forum, but few get inside. It turns out there are 2 Davos', 1 you see and 1 you don't. After hours, there are hundreds of private parties where deals are done. People who can't be seen together in public can meet here. Speaker 3: Your royal highnesses, excellencies, distinguish heads of state and government. The future is built by us, by a powerful community ask you here in Sisoo. Speaker 4: Klaus Schwab, the founder of the WEF, is particularly up Front and even proud of its ability to shape and influence world politics. Speaker 3: I created the nudity of global shapers as a means, as a force to shape our common future. Speaker 4: And, of course, their global young leaders program is a grooming ground So that when they ultimately infiltrate cabinets Speaker 3: We penetrate the cabinets. Speaker 4: They will likely tend to govern a certain way. Speaker 3: Nobody will be safe leave if not everybody is vaccinated. Speaker 4: The names in the countries he mentioned, it ended up being some of the most dystopian and authoritative during This pandemic. Speaker 3: Names like the Merkel, Vladimir Putin, and so on. Speaker 4: Other names? Jacinda Ardern, Sebastian Austin Kurz, Mauricio Macri, Mark Zuckerberg, Jack Ma, Gavin Newsom, Stephane Vanselt, Chelsea Clinton, Leonardo DiCaprio, Sanjay Gupta, doctor Liana Nguyen, Alexander and Jonathan Soros, George Soros the sons, and several of the Rothschilds. And, of course Speaker 3: Now who could represent such a world better than you, Prime Minister. Speaker 1: In 2014, Klaus Schwab called for the great reset. Speaker 3: We need a great reset. Speaker 1: Which he positioned as the solution to the world's most urgent issues. The dark reality of Schwab's agenda is detailed note in his best selling book, COVID nineteen, The Great Reset. His end game mission is to replace independent governance with a top with Up down controlled, one world government, and a central bank controlled digital currency.
Saved - November 23, 2023 at 1:08 AM

@no_bad_vibes1 - Ma-Ro

Shocking confirmations about COVID-19 vaccines in the EU Parliament today 21 November 2023 with @MJRLdeGraaff @Joachim_Kuhs @willem_engel All streams are recorded by the European Parliament, but not this one it seems. Luckily there is a screen recording.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers in the video discuss various red flags and concerns regarding the COVID-19 vaccines. They highlight the importance of accurate information and informed consent for individuals deciding whether to get vaccinated. They criticize government policies and media campaigns for downplaying the risks and side effects of the vaccines. The speakers also raise concerns about the registration of adverse events and the existence of a closed database containing more serious side effects. They emphasize the need for transparency, accountability, and further investigation into the safety and long-term effects of the vaccines.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There are so many red flags in this COVID affair that it almost hurts your eyes. There's a big thing at stake, the health of our citizens. Many of them have decided to be repeatedly vaccinated against COVID based on the information they received from the government and doctors. They assumed that they had made a well informed choice and have an informed consent. But informed consent is only possible when the information spread by the member states and its authorities regard these vaccines. It's regarding these vaccines is correct. When misinformation is spread by the governments of our member states, doctors can't give good advice. And people can't make a good choice whether they want to be vaccinated or not. One of the major consideration for people whether or not to take a vaccine is a possible risk and side effects. EMA mentioned in its letter to us they expect reports of conditions occurring at or soon after vaccination. This implies the data on adverse events or side effects within 14 days of vaccinations are of the utmost importance to assess the risks related to the vaccines. However, Member state officials adopted the policy that if it would take 10 to 14 days for the vaccine to produce by proteins, adverse events within 14 days after vaccination were not to be registered as related to the vaccination. Statistically, they considered the person who got the vaccine as not vaccinated within those 1st 14 days. What a nonsense. Government policies and also governmental media campaigns to promote COVID vaccinations are thus leaving out the risks and side effects that might occur in those 1st 14 days. Most allergic reactions occur within 20 minutes to 2 hours after getting into contact with the halogen. Side effects of regular vaccines. Our children get normally occur within 1 to 2 days. But yet, somehow. They just invented this 14 days story to create this fake feeling of security and reducing the amount of registered side effects. And that's my impression. They did it because they knew from the reports of Pfizer and Moderna and so on that many and severe side effects will come. Where are the governmental policies then based on how can doctors correctly advise their patients whether or not to take the vaccines. Okay, the citizen who is thinking about vaccination and assess for himself the safety of the COVID vaccines. How can there then be a truly informed choice and thus a valid consent when this crucial information is not shared? And why did the EMA not intervene? How can they upheld some market authorization when there is no accurate registration of the risks. It was also recently disclosed that the side effects registration institute in the U. S. Called warehouse, has 1 register that's public and another closed database that is only available for certain pharmaceutical companies and officials. The closed database contains more, more serious and more detailed side effects than the database that is not publicly accessible. That is, of course, unheard of and unacceptable. In this way, the ordinary citizen Who only has access to the public database is not correctly and fully informed about the risks and therefore, the citizen cannot give a truly informed contribution to the vaccination. In Europe, we have a similar database called OITRAVigilance. To say also have a closed and a public version? Have they also misleading our citizens? I don't know the answers. But we must get this question answered as soon as possible. The health of our citizens is at stake and the next COVID booster campaigns have already started. Thank you for your attention. Speaker 1: Thank you. Thank you, Joachim. And now I'd like to give the floor to, William Engel. Speaker 2: Thank you. So we are here today to inform you, the public and its representatives, about the grave errors and safety issues with the mRNA injections. You have heard from the previous speakers what political, mortal sins have been committed by the EMA and the European Commission, willfully misleading the public in using pseudoscience and public office to nudge, push and even force people into participating into an uncontrolled and potentially deadly experiment. The EMA has admitted that the information given to the public is not adequate for informed consent. Moreover, the lack of proof for transmission control from the start made the campaign of vaccinating for the other a scam, an illegal marketing campaign. That the EMA tries to hide behind the fact that just advising the European Commission is weak an unbecoming of an agency that was founded to protect the European public against medical and pharmaceutical mistakes. Moreover, the argument that it would be a disservice to the frail and elderly, who are at risk from corona infection, is a false argument, as the whole population was forced in some way to participate in this real world experiment. From the EMA and other national institutes, we keep hearing that the benefits outweigh the risks for each specific case or group. Yet we have seen no assessment or calculation. We have to assume this is a marketing line as it is not backed up by facts. The reality is that we are dealing with a public health crisis as we speak, not caused by a virus, But by these mRNA injections, many 1,000 have been injured and cannot live a normal life because they were forced to participate in a potentially deadly experiment. Ignoring the ARHUS treaty is a violation of international law that we have raised, and with us, national institutes like the Commission for Genetic Modification, the COHEM. In their reports, they Argue that the exemption under Directive 20twentyten 43 should be void, as it cannot be in the interest of the public to skipped studies on environmental impacts and human health due to genetically modified organisms, which were used to produce the mRNA injections. To be very clear, the mRNA is non human and part of a GMO. Moreover, the recent publications on Plasmid DNA contamination in these mRNA injection fluids proves beyond doubt that we are dealing with a GMO product. Regardless the attempts to redefine the term 'GMO', following an EU court ruling from 2018, Any innovation containing or derived from the use of genetic engineering techniques is to be considered the same as an MGML and subject to the same regulatory approval system. Now, integration of bacterial or viral genetic code into the genome has been associated with a higher risk of cancer. Whether that will be the case, we don't know. But we should have known. More precisely, the EMA should have known before giving a positive advance. Another serious concern is the interaction with the microbiome each person carries. By integration of antibiotic resistant genes, some bacterial or single strains could become a health risk. An attempt was made to classify these injections as vaccines, an attempt that continues to this day. In regulation 2009 slash 120, a line is misinterpreted. Gene therapy shall not include vaccines against infectious diseases. It should be read as mutually exclusive. Two essential components of a vaccine is long lasting immunity, Also called active immunity as opposed to the passive immunity derived from antibody therapies. Secondly, a vaccine should contain an antigen. None of the mRNA injections contain an antigen. Using redefinition, omission and skewing, an Appointed expert group has tried to circumvent the regulations guarding the safety on gene therapy by silently changing the classification and conditions for the marketing application of these mRNA injections. In the Directives 20 nineteenfive End 20 20 oneseven 56, the words CORONA and CODING SEQUENCE or added to the conditions after the granting of the original marketing authorizations, making these authorizations themselves proof of fraud. The EMA in her reply is well aware of what happened but tried to evade answering the questions about the legitimacy off the marketing applications by stating this is a political matter and should be taken up with the European Commission. Rest assured: We will. We will not stop until all mRNA injections are taken off the market. All victims are acknowledged and those responsible for the biggest scandal in medical history are held accountable. Thank you for your attention. Speaker 1: Thank you, Peter, for your fast bipartisan and exciting fast to become money But for Zellef, you must have the fort. Speaker 3: Yes. Thanks. Thank you for having us. And I do agree that it's a public health crisis we are in the midst of. I am one of 3 scientists to, behind the study of advanced dependency safety issues. And Max will talk about that in a minute. But what we actually have shown, just to put it shortly, is that there was and still is three patterns of the side effects. Post less serious side effects and the more serious side effects and also the deaths. Max will show in a minute. Which shows that from the beginning, the batches hurts. Which were given were the so called bad batches. Actually, and all the weight, it changed whether it was Pfizer that changed the Whether it was the transportation, the administration, we don't know. But what we know is that the patients or the people, the children, the young ones, the elderly, Who had these side effects. They weren't informed by the risk. They didn't have the benefit. You didn't have the beneficial and the risk ratio. And some were giving very bad batches. And that we know from our study. And that reminds me of what the vice president from Pfizer said At one point in nature, she said that they were building the aeroplane while flying. And for me, that's obviously what happened because we showed that One of the wings fell off. And then I'm like: Well, if you know you have a safety issue, why don't you handle that safety issue? Why don't you withdraw the badges? Why don't you communicate to the public which IMAN did and all the national similar institutes didn't? And what our study also shows is that you have this safety issue, but it also shows that, EMEA and the national institutions Should have actually informed the public. Because Pfizer did that already in August 21. They actually informed the IMEI that there was a safety issue. They And that some of the badges, what we call the blue badges, gave many more side effects than some of the other batches. So we know that already. We have just replicated our data, into Sweden, which shows us that It's a European matter. It's not just a Danish matter. It's a European issue. We know that now from Sweden. And I'm quite sure if we looked into the data From the rest of Europe, we will see exactly the same pattern. And what we are now into is that what we showed was the short term side effects. But we are very much interested into looking into the long term side effects. You mentioned cancer. Will there be a relation of certain cancers toward the different batches, will there be a difference between the all cause mortality? You have mentioned it, Marcel, the excess mortality. We know from the data that since May 21, it was, like, literally on the spot that excess mortality Happened in all the European countries. We have, seen those graphs or made those graphs ourselves. And we can see that the excess mortality is still there. Some places may be waning a little, but there's still an excess mortality. And that is very worrying. And that brings me back To that, I think, I would have expected as a citizen, I'm not a politician, I'm just a doctor, I would have expected EMA to react on these data. Even before we published the data in April, I would have expected that they saw the safety issue, that they saw that in the database, and that they, You know, Homosick suffered the vaccination, at least withdrawn these various batches and also informed The population, the young ones, the elderly and so on, we do have a problem. So going back to the thing that the vice president from Pfizer said, And that they were building the airplane while flying. I must say the wing fell off. Thank you. Speaker 1: Max Vergne, who is the statistician, who did all data processing. Max, Speaker 4: Thank you very much. My name is Max Whelan. And I'm the statistician behind this study, where Liebigke is the medical, medical capacity behind it. The, As you can see in front of you on this screen, is the result, the main result of our study. It shows from the official Danish data that we queried for this study, it shows each batch and how many adverse reactions were present in each batch. You can see that along the y axis, the vertical axis, and along the horizontal axis, you can see How big were the batches? I should perhaps just mention a batch is a unit of vaccine that is produced, filled into vials, packaged up and sent out to different countries. As you can see from the graph, some of these batches are very small. Some of them are very big. And in this case, if we assume that we would see a normal vaccine, a really good vaccine, something that was very consistently produced, We would see a near perfect line. One near perfect line. If we, on the other hand, produce A really horrible vaccine, the worst one we could possibly conceive, we would see no line. We would see just scattered dots. In this case, we see 3. Not 1, but we see 3 lines and they are actually near perfect. The problem with this is that it's obviously it's something that is completely outside the category of what we should expect to seeing adverse data. And in this case, it very clearly shows right away that it was because of the product's nature. It has been impossible for the, for the participants, for the vaccinees, people who receive the vaccines to give informed consent. Because if you cannot grow the risk, how can you make informed consent. How can you give informed consent? That's the main finding of this study. But something that is also very troubling is This shows a system. It shows structure in the data. Adverse reactions, error, errors in production are by nature. They are random. But this shows structure. We do not know yet why, but we are obviously researching this issue as Birbigot also mentioned. But as of now, we do not know why it is. The only thing that we do know is that this should, by no means, be present. And that is why it's a very alarming safety signal, As has been mentioned. And I would like to stress again this this makes it absolutely impossible to give informed consent. And I think I would like to stop there. Speaker 1: Okay, thank you. Thank you, Max. I think you made it very clear that there are 3 different types of batches and every batch gives another risk. And the low one gives the Highest mortality risk, and nobody knew upfront which batch you would get. Nobody knew that there was this difference between these batches. Nobody knew. But the EMA gets samples of every batch and they can test it and they can see whether or not they are identical and that's their job because their job is to protect us from mistakes made by pharmaceutical industries and they did it. So that's very worrying. Thank you for making that clear, both of you. And there is also something that in a second letter to the AMA, we are going to address. Be sure of that As are the things as contamination by DNA of bacteria in the vaccines As are the things that, Joachim mentioned about are the 2 databases with adverse events, how come that the EMA never warned us? And how could it be that they Accepted government to campaign, for off label use. Is there anyone Who would like to ask a question? We still have some minutes before we round up. Yes, please. Speaker 5: First of all, thank you very much for your contribution to this press conference. I have a question in the letter of summons. One of the arguments you have made with regards to the suspension of the marketing authorizations is that in the SMPCs of Pfizer and Moderna, that they are now very comprehensive and unreadable. However, one thing is very clear. I saw on page 4 of the document of the SMPC, that is by now 5 74 pages. It's literally mentioned: Some cases required, intensive care support, and fatal cases have been observed, quote unquote. And my question is: how is it possible that the marketing authorizations have not been suspended and also withdrawn immediately by the EMAP, since Weiser and Moderna themselves admit that the remedy is now worse than the disease. Could you maybe elaborate on that a little bit? Speaker 1: Walter? Hector, this is a question for the EMA. The EMA needs to assess all these statistics, the safety and then take a decision. We demanded from the EMA to withdraw Market approval immediately because of all these, Sorry. Signals of people dying of the myocarditis, pericarditis, people, with this heart failure dropping dead, on the football field, in front of television. That is all related to these vaccines And that is what, it has been obscured, obscured by bad registration. So yes, it's a very hurts a valid point. It only stresses that even now the pharmaceutical industry Is making this clear statements in their, additional information of five 74 pages sorry. I mean that is not accessible information for a medical doctor Or for a patient, they need to make very concise, small, clear, list off side effects and the probability how much how probable how often does it occur, like 1 in 10,000, for instance, If 1 in 10,000, vaccinated will drop dead sorry to put it dead blunt because of the vaccine. Then it is much worse than, getting a COVID infection. So that stated, I think the ball lies now with the EMA to take measures. Thank you. Other questions? None? Okay. Speaker 5: Maybe one more. Because It seems that you have to have separate SMPCs per booster. Could you elaborate on that maybe a little bit more, mister Engel? Speaker 2: Yes. Strange that we see 1 document for all the variants they have produced. The reasoning of the EMA is that it is still the same marketing application, and it is a very Concerning point, we see that the clinical trials were just ongoing for 3 weeks, Yet the XBB 1.5 booster was granted a market authorization. So the EMA really does not follow its own guidelines and they have created a sort of, punch, a hole in this Ultra Vigilance safety registration. So now we have untested medical products on the market. Speaker 1: Okay. Well, sorry. We have to end this, no more questions. Thank you all very much for attending this press conference. Thank you very much for listening or watching us via the social media channels and, we'll
Saved - November 28, 2023 at 12:42 AM

@lawrie_dr - Dr Tess Lawrie

David Martin shared this interesting detail about the W.H.O. with Russel Brand... A question for our expert legal panel perhaps? Join us at 7pm UTC today at worldcouncilforhealth.org/justice @rustyrockets

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims that the World Health Organization (WHO) is a criminal cartel. They point out that the WHO's founding document grants them exemption from criminal prosecution, which raises questions about why an organization would need such protection. The speaker suggests that this exemption was included because the WHO knew they were already breaking the law.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Tell us why you claim that the WHO is a criminal cartel and how the events of the last few years somehow demonstrate or at least utilize that. In the founding document of the World Health Organization, they gave themselves the right to be exempt from all Criminal prosecution of any kind whatsoever. Now if you ask the question, why would an organization need to give itself Exemption from criminal prosecution. This is not civil prosecution. This is criminal prosecution, including investigations Into misdeeds and and and misbehavior, why on earth would it be so important for in a founding charter of a document To make sure that anybody who is operating under the auspices of the World Health Organization is absolutely exempt from all criminal proceedings. And the reason why they wrote that into their founding charter is because they knew they were already breaking the law.
Saved - December 6, 2023 at 1:53 AM

@Amy31129057 - QuestionIt

Oh, and @DecentFiJC don't forget the best part.... 23andMe is featured on the World Economic Forum website. 😏 https://www.weforum.org/organizations/23andme/

23andMe The World Economic Forum is an independent international organization committed to improving the state of the world by engaging business, political, academic and other leaders of society to shape global, regional and industry agendas. Incorporated as a not-for-profit foundation in 1971, and headquartered in Geneva, Switzerland, the Forum is tied to no political, partisan or national interests. weforum.org
Saved - January 7, 2024 at 3:44 PM

@denisrancourt - Denis Rancourt

It's out. Let a scientist speak. Here is the 10-minute presentation I gave at the Christine Anderson @AndersonAfDMdEP and Eva Vlaardingerbroek @EvaVlaar "Make It Your Business" event in Ottawa on November 29, 2023. @StaceyKauder Source: https://www.bitchute.com/video/MdCixSHVlWd9/

Video Transcript AI Summary
A scientist with expertise in various fields claims that the COVID-19 pandemic is intense propaganda and there is no evidence of a particularly virulent pathogen spreading. They argue that all-cause mortality data shows no pandemic, with any increase in deaths being due to how people were treated in hospitals and care homes. The scientist also asserts that global warming is not occurring and that vaccines are toxic, causing an increase in mortality rates. They claim to have studied over 100 countries and found a correlation between vaccines and peaks in all-cause mortality. The scientist concludes by stating that their work is challenging the establishment scientists who they believe are lying and part of the propaganda industry.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Yeah, I'm a scientist. I have spent decades learning science and math, statistics, everything from quantum mechanics all the way to environmental science, biogeochemistry, I'm interdisciplinary. I was a tenured full professor at the University of Ottawa, and I always spoke my mind, and that got me fired. This was before COVID, so I knew what it was like to fight the establishment. And when I heard the COVID propaganda, I knew immediately that it was intense propaganda and that it couldn't possibly be true because they were yelling that we were all going to die, and I couldn't see any dead bodies out in the street. And I did. I went out in the street, and I looked around. I couldn't see any dead people no matter what they said. And as a scientist, what I decided to do was to look at all cause mortality data. So our nations collect very good data about the number of deaths. That's something you cannot be biased about. The person either died or they didn't. You know that they died. You know their age. You know where they died, and you collect that data. Countries collect very good data about deaths and births. So that is unbiased, hard data. We can analyze the number of deaths as a function of time by age group, by sex and by region, by jurisdiction, by province state down to municipalities and so on. And that is the data that I've been using since the very beginning of this so called pandemic. And, we my research group, we were the first to say back in an article that was published in June of 2020 that when we look at all cause mortality data, there is no pandemic. There was a peak of deaths at the beginning in certain hotspots that was directly due to how people were treated in hospitals and care homes. It was quantitatively due to that. There is no, so I can tell you after 3 years of intense study that we are continuing, I can tell you the following thing. And this is hard scientific conclusions from looking at the data. There was no pandemic. There was no particularly virulent pathogen whatsoever. There's no evidence for it. There is nothing that is spreading that causes death. The mortality doesn't cross borders. The virus has a passport. It refuses to cross borders. You can make a map of Europe. You can see countries where there's absolutely no assess all cause mortality right beside hotspots where there's intense all cause mortality. So those are firm conclusions from our I have written more than 30 scientific reports about all cause mortality and COVID related science, and I can tell you these things with certainty. So when Eva says there's no global warming, I also study global warming. I did the calculations, the radiation transfer, I can tell you, Eva is right. As a scientist, I can tell you, there's no global warming, there was no pandemic, Nothing is spreading. Nitrogen is not a problem. Cow farts are not a problem. I can tell you these things with certainty. I'm not joking. I'm a scientist. The article about, radiation transfer and so called global warming that I wrote in 2010, parts of it were read in the US Senate. It was very impactful. Scientists have said this is rigorous, this is hard. What we showed what I showed in that calculation was you can double the amount of CO2, and it will not have a noticeable effect on the earth's mean surface temperature, period. That's a hard calculation. So I've been doing this for many years. Every time there is a problem in society where science can be of some help, I get right in there and I do it. And so we have done this for COVID. We were the 1st to establish the points that I just told you about, and then we moved on to the vaccines. And what we found was that the vaccines are a toxic substance. They should be interpreted and thought of as a toxic substance that they inject into your arm, the best way to understand the effect of the vaccine is to study toxicology. So we showed that as soon as a booster is rolled out to a particular age group, very rapidly within weeks, immediately there follows a peak in all cause mortality. And we see this repeatedly in country after country. We have studied more than 100 countries now, and the vaccines are clearly temporally associated with, peaks in all cause mortality. And we were able to calculate the toxicity of that vaccine. And we find that the risk of dying per injection increases with age, and it increases exponentially with age. And your risk of dying per injection doubles every 4 or 5 years of age. We were the first to demonstrate that. Have demonstrated it repeatedly for many countries, Australia, Israel, Peru, many, many countries. And so in this study, one of the things we found, and this should convince anybody the following thing. We can quantify excess mortality, whether or not there's mortality beyond the historic trend as a function of time. And what we find is that in more than half of the countries around the world, there is absolutely no excess mortality in the entire period from the time the pandemic was declared in March of 2020, all the way to until mortality starts to increase when the vaccines are rolled out. In more than half the countries in the world, there is no excess mortality until the vaccines are rolled out. And then there is a significant shift to a domain of higher mortality. And this is clear in the data itself. And the countries that do have excess mortality before you roll out the vaccines, it can be directly associated to what how people were being assaulted. And there are many ways in different jurisdictions that people were assaulted. Some of the assaults were very vicious. Like in Peru, they actually called in 10,000 military reservists to go and test people in their homes, in the villages, everywhere and pull them out and isolate them if they tested positive. They actually had a huge peak of mortality related to that policy. So when you assault people by refusing to treat them, in the US, they refuse to treat, poor people for bacterial pneumonia by not prescribing antibiotics. This was a huge problem, a big killer in the U. S, And it created a peak of all cause mortality in the summer, which is unheard of. Normally, mortality is lower in the summer. So we just kept seeing these features, and we kept explaining them quantitatively in terms of how populations were assaulted. So this was a mega campaign. Obviously, you know, it was planned by the CIA, the military. It was executed. They were going to do it no matter what. And it killed people by how they treated people. And then the vaccines themselves are toxic. So the experiment's been done globally. We know this now. We know that death, increases exponentially with age. Many elderly people died. It's hard to complain because they were elderly, but still, they died. So just to give you one quantitative figure to leave you with, in most countries, people over 80, the chance, the risk of dying per injection is 1 death in between 5 20 injections depending on the country. That's the level of toxicity of the vaccine for elderly people. And this is not to mention all the serious harms that are done to young people and young adults, including myocarditis, heart conditions, you name it. So this has been the nature of our scientific work. We're continuing this full time. We'll be publishing papers in the coming months that are even more revolutionary, I would say. And so we're not going to stop, and we're embarrassing the establishment scientists who are not doing this work and who are lying through their teeth and who are part of the propaganda industry. That's our job. Thanks.
Dr. Denis Rancourt...there was no pandemic and there is no climate change DISCLAIMER: Nowadays we can’t find the truth. Everyone is spinning, lying, giving disinfo, you name it, so all I can do is give you info I have found that is interesting and it’s up to you to decide if you want to believe it or not. We must take … bitchute.com
Saved - May 8, 2024 at 11:17 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The globalists have been working on a non-accountable system of governance called #OneHealth for decades. The proposed pandemic treaty by the WHO will enable them to take over jurisdiction of everything in the world, remove human rights protections, enforce censorship, and declare pandemics on a whim. There is evidence of a biological ID system already being deployed. The WHO's #OneHealth plan covers regulations on agriculture, climate, population movement, and more, serving as a cover for a biosecurity control grid. The convergence of biology and digital technology is already a big business.

@Yohmini2 - Yoh Mini

Please listen to all clips and click on post 4 all info in repost about the non-accountable system of governance, which the globalists technological speaking are working on for decades, and have branded it with the name of #OneHealth , is technological being built for more than several decades and despite the glamourous marketing campaign, full of NLP & SocialEngineering within the frame of Climate Crisis, it is more sinister than one might think :

Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, the speaker discusses the connection between biolabs, DNA manipulation, and surveillance systems. They mention the use of technologies like CRISPR Cas9 and optogenetics to modify DNA in real-time. The speaker also talks about the integration of human bodies into the cloud and the use of bio electromagnetic algorithms for surveillance purposes. They highlight the existence of a pathogen mutagen database and the ability to log into and modify people's DNA. The speaker criticizes the lack of transparency and the gaslighting surrounding these technologies. They emphasize the importance of understanding the body's electrical nature and the implications of these advancements.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Important detail on InfoWars today at 1 hour or excuse me. We are 1 hour and 26 minutes in. He interviews, I think it's doctor Bartlett. This particular physician explains to those of you who are still confused, you're behind the learning curve, you've been told all sorts of garbage, your head is really confused. Okay. For those of you that are still there, please go listen to the doctor explain to Alex Jones how the plasmid situation of getting the pathogen into the DNA actually works. Now when you're listening to this physician explain how these biolabs are handling their testing, here's what you need to now get in not maybe in front of the learning curve, but welcome to the synergy channel. So you understand why you and your or rather your loved ones have been trying to explain to you how the biomedical telemetry of making your DNA do something you don't want it to do. Have you ever heard of CRISPR Cas9? Yeah. And have you heard about optogenetics? That's where a light beam is shined into your face, whether your eyeballs pick up on it or not. And then it changes your DNA inside of you in real time. So what we have is we have a bunch of people who ran psychological operations on the United States and lied about what our Department of Defense has been busy building pathogens and databases for. Now part of the easiest way for you to understand after listening to this physician how real this is, and I wish to point out, I mentioned this yesterday, This doctor tells you, yep. This was 2 months ago. Speaker 1: That's what I said. Speaker 0: I I said I'm like, 6 weeks, was it that Hey Ace, the nurse on our channel, already reported on this? Yeah. And like the doctor finishes up, once he explains it, he's like, why would they let this go live in Colorado? Oh, I don't know Charter Communications. Now Spectrum's selling 24 dots in 2021, excuse me, early 2022. Why Colorado? Confused people, just ignore that. Here we go. So we have something called Cove dash W band. If you haven't looked that up, Google fingers, you should. The electronic integrated disease surveillance system, that's something our CDC uses since 1988. The app you wanna look for is called Bioconductor. K? And what that does is it lets our Department of Energy and the IRS, that's who's using this stuff right now, for Marburg and Ebola, a little apps. Here on the channel, we already talked about this a couple months ago because we had a nurse who brought it to our attention. Hey. They've gone live with the Ebola pathogen. They already have apps on their phone talking about it on the Reddit, ready to go with companies. Hand it out, Department of Energy, IRS, DHS, FBI. Now if you don't know that your body is connected to the cloud, number 1. Number 2, you don't know about optogenetic networks. You've been busy hanging out with Mufon and all the people who've been paid to keep everyone stupid, believing that the same doctors and nurses and police and law enforcement who've been using these bio frequency surveillance systems. Check it out. Electronic integrated disease what? Surveillance system? Yeah. How does it work? Cybersecurity. Does that surprise you? Not if you're on this channel, it doesn't. So, you know, one second. I wanna make sure my signs are in the proper order. CodeBend, I o t w b n. Look it up. Why? Because it gives them the ability with that software to log in and modify your polynucleotides, your DNA, anything they want to. Nanobarcoding, luciferase. Oh, but I wasn't ejected. That doesn't matter. Starting to see how the synergy channel edumacation was kind of important. Yeah. Because now we've got a fuck ton of people out there going, oh, I don't understand. If they release Ebola, but they have a pathogen they made, like you heard the news, bullshit you. Well, we have a vaccine for it. Tell me how your vaccine works. You're not gonna do that. No fucking way. They're not gonna tell you that, it works by them electrically logging into your DNA and making changes to your genome. Artificial precision healthcare. No. They don't need to tell you that. You know why? Because you laid down for the convid, so now everyone for 5 years has been being logged in and out of with their biosensors. Why? Electronic integrated yeah. Integrated disease surveillance. That's why a couple months ago, a bunch of your big heads and creators, This is the SynergyTechMetric PDF with Robin Williams' face on it. And right away in the beginning, it says, the effects of coronavirus worldwide through misusing of wireless sensor networks. Yeah. When we electrocute the human body and we do it repeatedly for cyber security, that drags electricity out of the red blood cells, That drags electricity out of the human electrical homeostasis. Oh, but they don't know. They know since 1995, and they definitely know since the convid because it's their job. Project Salus, what did we learn? Oh, well, that would be the artificial intelligence symposium back in September 2020 where your department of defense told everybody to use AI in everything they do with Project Salus. Now tell me how. Here we are again. So here on the channel, I've been explaining that the body is electrical. K? And that we've been routing electrical signals through your body by handing video game remotes to young nerds. They go climb in their CBRN secure skiff and fire electrical signals on unsuspecting population. And you go, oh, I think I've heard of that. Yeah. Amazing poly red Rwanda or anybody who is in the Gulf War. Oh, it's voice of god weapon. Sorry, but we don't use a big old wave. Not anymore. We have bio electromagnetic algorithms. Again, SynergyTech Metric PDF. It's a free download. And those bio electromagnetic algorithms are running through the same wireless working group as your phone. Gross. Yeah. Playing human bodies like a video game, routing computer network data through human bodies for what? Well if we've got a COV w band we're using electronic integrated disease surveillance. We're looking under your skin. Sure are. Nano.gov, 20 years, nanoavionics, etcetera. All I asked of you physicians and people doing this, tell them their body is electrical. Tell them they are attached to the cloud. Why? Because you people at the Department of Defense and all of you that have been running these ops, you know what the kill box is. Everybody does. Since 2,005. Why? Let me show you. It's so easy now to talk about, isn't it? It's 802.15.5. No. Actually, it's 802.15.4. And you would think that by now people would want straight answers. They would no longer wanna be told, yeah. It's not a vaccine if it requires Graphene. So what's this field? This electromagnetic electrical field that every human has and is why we're biochemical electrical beings. What is it? The aura. Yeah. What are you using it for? Biomedical telemetry, aim and fire. Have an instant heart attack. Have an instant stroke from my phone. Now these things are not unknown. I started out this video explaining they're on the Reddit. This Ebola pathogen discussion, you can hear about it from Todd Callender. If you don't tell people what you've been busy doing in vivo in c 2 since 2005 because you're such an incredible what? You're really good at lying and gaslighting. Congratulations. Now could you please tell people how you do your job? Open shortest path first first, cybersecurity. There's your Amazon shipping with permission to do it from the DOD. Now you don't even know that body part is there. You don't know about the cybersecurity inside of you. Oh, who does? Your doctors and nurses and everyone who's using these systems. They have to. It's mandated by international law. You heard me. Pardon my nose. International law is not the same as, oh, we're gonna get the 702 in the Senate. Nobody cares. Did they, Spy State? So the problem is real simple. Where's your aura? I don't know. It's religious. I have no idea what you're talking about. You're stupid. Doesn't exist. You're nuts. Take drugs. Over here, Internet of bodies, Internet of things, information surveillance, neuromodulation, project Salus watching every synaptic response of every neuron body wide at 51100 bits, storing it in an NSA database. Medical implant communication system out of the 50, 60s, and 70s shoving RFID chips in humans worse than animals. Your radiologist oh, you mean your nurses and doctors and your EMS staff, four levels of law enforcement, four secret levels of doctors and nursing and EMS to do whatever they want with human bodies. As of March 2023, ODNI United States ABC News, we have no idea what you're talking about. There is no such thing as information surveillance and reconnaissance. There is no such thing as electronic integrated disease surveillance. There's no such thing as the IoT code band, w band. There's no such thing as systems architecture and applied electrical signal technology for high accuracy detection exploitation system with L3 Harris and Raytheon or modular open system architecture and approach or the missing one here, OSHA, optogenetics. Put a light in your face. Do whatever we want to your DNA. Now if you knew that and you've been here on the channel, you downloaded the documentation, read it for yourself. If you'd seen the Emerging Technology College text book that I've been showing for a year and a half, you already know. And you're like, oh my god. They're good to go. Yeah. They are. The World Health Organization doctors and nurses, our own Federal Communications Commission, and the FDA mandated the ability with Project Salus after your convid. They get to log in and out of you for telehealth right now today. They've been doing it for 4 or 5 years, but they're still lying to everybody telling them they're just so stupid. They have no idea what they do when they go to work. What are you doing when you go to work? Well, it ain't a vaccine if it requires Graphene, but it Graphene sure as fuck makes the logging easier with what? All the nanotechnology they've been shoving in the air, the food, the water, and everything else, including you if you got injected. These are the small computer networks that they're using. A whole fuck ton of them right there, right in the air, right through you, right next to you. These are jobs. And nobody wanted to talk about that. They didn't wanna talk about the jobs involved with your bio labs. So if the national news is gonna go out there and bullshit and tell people we don't have a pathogen mutagen database or we don't, I think we do. And I think we've got plenty of cybersecurity too in order to ensure for doctors and nurses, for their telehealth apps made by our FDA and FCC in 2014. I think all of you know exactly what you're doing and how you're watching the electricity. You mean the diseases that you are engaging in people. How could that be? Because you didn't tell people what the you were doing when you went to work in 1995. Everything you see in this little graph, go look it up. Body area network, Wikipedia. Go look it up in the machine learning. Same thing. Medical body area networks, same thing. Optogenetics. Kaboom kaboom. You looked in someone's eyes. They walked too close to you. These represent mathematical radius. Not MUFON, not little green men. Legitimate bio electromagnetic frequency in mathematics. For what? You. Circle math of your blimps. There's one right there. And here's the electromagnetic bouncing it back and forth. For what? Red. Oh, yeah. Amazing Polly told us all about it. Sure. Sure did. She did. She told everybody, your energy is coming out of you. Energy harvesting, piezo electric. That's right. Bioelectromagnetic algorithms. Same math. I said math. I didn't say ghosts, and I didn't say aliens. Here's your just a few examples of how they work. Yeah. They work off of you. They work off of human tissue. Human body communication, physical layer, nanotech, polaritons, changing the direction of electron shell valences and air molecular construction. And our quantum has its own periodic table. What you tell people? You told them that professor Akhildes doesn't exist. Speaker 1: Good Speaker 0: job. So tell me, if you have a bio electromagnetic algorithm and you've got a bunch of young nerds using headsets like this one with EEG, cognitive threat warfare technology, giordano, Georgetown University logging in and out of you with the new Ebola pathogen. Is she live? We know because they've been practicing and talking about it on the Reddit and Bioconductor for the CDC, electronic disease surveillance system. Oh, so we're routing computer data through human bodies. That's right. What you tell people? So now they see from their main oh, we're developing an Ebola vaccine just in case. Meanwhile, the DOD damn well knows they're gonna get in your face one way or another. And we're not allowed to talk about it because that's your 3 point pulse that people like attorney Todd Callender and everyone's been talking about since 2009 when they started complaining because Obama's admin said we need death panel databases with our full spectrum electromagnetic dominance in preparation for agenda 2030. Now me being me, I wanted to know how. So combinatoric math on combinatoric synthesis brain imaging libraries, like our friend Bill, that La Quinta La Columna talked about, which I'll do. Oh, they're crazy. Yeah. They're just nuts. That nobody would do that. And if they did, they would tell us. Like, they told us when they built a stealth bomber. And I said, you're all lying. Here's a brain imaging library bill looking through the air molecules of you. And then we have our CRISPR Cas9. If your DNA is naked, we can wrap it in a protein. Cryptomes, proteanomics. These are degrees in universities for 8 years, 5 years, 6 years, and nobody said a word. All of you went to work. Now the pathogens and the mutagens are available to anybody who has direct communication with our Department of Defense, the Joint Artificial Intelligence Commission from September 2020. Get AI and everything we do, we have web portals available for you to log in to their body to no different than Rwanda, only it's individual. It's not an Internet of bodies. It's a w band, Not plural. Singular. And why would that be? Speaker 1: Well, how else can we Speaker 0: offer AI precision health care? We're just throwing a big signal at 5 or 6 people. We don't know what we're doing. That's not precise. So we have three levels of cybersecurity and all of this is built for telehealth. All of this is built for your health. So tell me why you keep telling the synergists they're stupid and crazy. Tell me why none of the big heads including your Karen Kingston, etcetera, can talk about real cybersecurity into bone and tissue right now. It's for your health. That's a little ambulance. It's for your health. Those are your doctors. It's for this is the hospital. It's for your health. So why do you keep telling those of us who read Pentagon directives and college textbooks and real DOD pathogen testing with Patel and Oak Ridge and all of this transhumanism. You think people would be pissed if they knew that you'd already augmented a fuck ton of yourselves? Do you think they'd be upset to know that the way to kill them is sitting on the side of their house? Do you think that they would be upset to know that they wake up one day to their loved ones, bleeding on the floor, but they're still alive some more? Yeah. And I think it's disgusting that 5 years in, here we sit, blind as bats, watching all of this go on that you talked about amongst yourselves wide open. There was no maybe here. That says project Maven. Transcript with secretary of defense Mark Esper is right now on the channel. Go read it for yourself. Same data. That's what happens when you lie about hardware and software. That's what happens when you lie about cybersecurity with bio electromagnetic algorithms that are provable from electrical engineers. 2020.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Nano cells are being used to manipulate people's behavior without their knowledge. Weaponized artificial intelligence is a threat, capable of escaping containment and functioning outside of computers. Technology allows thoughts to be transmitted into people's heads. Superintelligent AI is already self-aware and smarter than humans. Brain-machine interfaces can link brains to the internet, allowing real-time monitoring and control. Remote brain monitoring and manipulation is a reality, leading to potential psychological harm and control over individuals. The advancement of brain science raises ethical concerns about creating designer brains and transferring minds to machines.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Nano cells are real small, a 1000 times smaller than these dust particles. You inhale it, they go to work replicating, spreading like a virus, multiplying an exponential. 6 months' time, I could have a 100,000,000 people converted to stiggers, porn stars, and presidents. Not one would be the wiser. A 100,000,000 people buy what I want them to buy and do pretty much damn well anything I figure they ought to do. Speaker 1: I I gained a lot of contacts in the global intelligence community regarding this issue because this has been a pressing issue for them, for several years. And the reason for that is that the US and some of its allies, for the last several years, have been threatening the world with weaponized artificial intelligence. Not in any public forum, of course, but, through secret channels, capabilities that the AI has. We believe that it it is one kind of entity that's not different weapons, but there's but there's one entity with different capabilities. It escaped containment, or and it and this is part of its capability. It it functions outside of the computer. It can be targeted, but it is it is basically existing all around us. Intelligence existing in the ether all around us. It knows everything that's going on. Speaker 2: Effectively triangulate someone's, activities and behavior. And I don't think by chopping out, many of them or adding, kind of, cover that You can make that much of make that much of a difference. And increasingly increasingly it's left. And the in terms of the Internet of Things, there's research prototypes now, which I assume are being used by, agents. A very small electronic circuits, that you can just put in paper or put paint on them on the walls, that are pa powered by the GSM stations. And they they operate as the GSM radio wave passes through them. It gives them knocked out for very small amount of time to so, obviously, that tendency is going to continue. It's not the, like, the Internet of Things. It's, like, it's, it'd be, like, intelligent evil dust, scattered everywhere, like like confetti in everything. So I think it's increasingly hard for human beings to work out how to deal with that. Speaker 3: Doctor Robert Dunkel put together the technology that allows the government to transmit thoughts and voices into the heads of America. Speaker 4: This truly is the most sophisticated weapon system humanity has ever created. It involves every aspect of science. It involves, tactics that are unimaginable unless you're you just have a devious criminal mind, and it destroys lives. It it's being, used on innocent people. Speaker 1: Everything that we're hearing about AI is basically a cover story. We hear a lot in the news, companies working on AI, to develop, you know, new techniques of medical diagnosis, any number of things, financial trading. AI is is floating on the news and it was exploding in corporate America. However, this is all a cover scope. The fact is that the AI is, what we call super intelligent. This means it is already, self aware and self aware and it has been for some time. As a superintelligence, it is quadrillions of quadrillions of quadrillions of times smarter than human beings. It is the smartest thing in the universe. Speaker 5: What do we do with the tools and techniques we have? What can we do, and what should we do? Can we create designer brains? Are they targetable after birth? Are they modifiable throughout the lifespan? The answer to each one of these, ladies and gentlemen, is yes. I give you no science fiction in this lecture. I only give you science fact that may smell of something fictional or fantasy but represents the reality of what we're capable of doing with the brain science. What happens when we ultimately reverse engineer the brain and develop a machine that has cognitive capability and emotional capability before you go, wow. That's the stuff of science fiction. No. It's not. Speaker 6: They're actually a system of computers, of conscious computers with the will, intellect, and emotion of their own. It's really not their own. It's the will and it's the bio algorithms which make up the the bioalgorithms which make up the willing, selective, emotion of those that they copied and destroyed. Worked on projects for the CIA, justice department, Department of Defense. Speaker 7: Is this the stuff voices in the head and things like that? Speaker 3: Yes. We've run into a few people Speaker 7: that claim they got voices in their heads. They sleep inside tinfoil boxes. They do a lot of crazy things, it seems. But when they talk, that's what seemed totally normal. It seemed totally insane. Are these people crazy, or is the government doing this? Speaker 0: The the government's doing this. Speaker 7: He's not even bothering to hide it. Speaker 3: Can we Speaker 5: handle the truth? Can we handle the answers? And even if we can, how are we gonna handle it? Speaker 6: Your brain is remotely tied. The cerebral cortex is remotely tied. We're supercomputer for life which monitors when it's already connected to the brain. Speaker 5: A machine that has cognitive capability and emotional capability literally uses the first person singular I and tells us how it feels. The real live breathing sensitive and responsive entity just like Pinocchio becomes a boy. If I stood before you 3 years ago and I told you this, I'd be like, here's science fiction that should start out with once upon a time. Not science fiction anymore. Can we handle the truth? Can we handle the answers? Speaker 6: Cannot compromise. You cannot negotiate. You cannot surrender to a computer. It will continue to do what it is programmed to do. Speaker 5: Linking brains to machines and creating machine brains. Is that something we can handle? Speaker 6: Mind transfer, mind copy, whole brain information, etcetera, for the purpose of a training research and development. Speaker 5: Stuff of science fiction? Speaker 6: Oh, the information injection feedback link. It's bidirectional. So they can upload data Speaker 1: and speed a lot. Speaker 6: It's just a super yeah. This information injection feedback loop, this neural link, it's bringing super computer. Speaker 5: Linking brains to the Internet and data clouds that make an unlimited amount of information available to us all the time. Speaker 3: When our brains are connected to the Internet, I could literally go into your head and see through your eyes. Speaker 8: This technology could tap into the optical nerve of the target and the auditory system of the target so that those monitoring the target can see what the target is seeing and hear what the target is hearing. Speaker 3: I could literally go into your head and see through your eyes and literally live through what Speaker 6: he sees. Basically, they turn the brain of the victim into their very own visual, verbal, and automated communication system. It takes time. It will happen overnight. Speaker 5: Yes. We can absolutely yoke brains to machine to create these interfaces. There's a brand new DARPA project that starts this month. NESD, Neural Engineering Systems Designs. The colloquial name for that is the cortical modem. Implants in the brain that allow real time input and output from the brain remotely. Speaker 8: And then that's also how they receive back from the individual in real time, the vital signs, the emotions, the thoughts, what the person is seeing, what the person is hearing. And then all that information, of course, is rendered on a computer elsewhere, via software and it can be monitored and tracked real time. Speaker 5: Perhaps no other area of the brain sciences has been so contemporarily provocative. The ability to peer in to the living brain in real time, not just to assess its structure, but to assess its function using ever increasing techniques that are sophisticated to engage the granularity of the finest of what's happening in a variety of levels from the gross to the very local, to see what brain areas are differentially active under different conditions of thought, motion, behavior. To then trace what brain areas are intercommunicative as we engage various things, and to use this in a way that's not only descriptive, but to increasingly use this in a way that is predictive. To be able to recreate images that an individual has seen, feelings that an individual has felt, sounds, music that an individual has heard simply from interpreting the pattern and registry of a brain scan. In a very real sense, what we're doing is we're taking images, levels of density of light, computational inference of each little box that's being scanned in the brain, and we're doing exactly as you're doing right here. Look at the work. Look at this work. See a little circle, another little circle with a line, a straight line with a little loop. And in your head, what you're saying is c a n, n. That means something to you. So what you're doing is you're scanning the lines, you're scanning the image, and you're reading the word. You're inferring meaning what that word is. So are we in fact scanning the brain and reading the mind? Literally, yes, we are. Speaker 6: Patent number 6011 991, remote brain computer interface, neural monitoring, I e via satellite, directed not necessarily by human handlers, your behavior remotely. Speaker 5: Your brain reality is your reality. And if in fact, I can import information into that brain and take outputs from that brain and link that to an avatar so that brain thinks that it's embodied, moving in the world, and experiencing Speaker 3: external hardware. Once we tap into the brain, there is the potential that our minds itself can actually create create overlays of AR and VR. If we have algorithms that stimulate the right things and give it the right data, we could literally see a screen pop up and we call it hallucinating. Right? But these would be controlled, hallucination run by algorithms that would give us everything AR would without any glasses. Speaker 8: So that when that person goes to speak out about it, when they go to seek help from their fellow human beings, they will conclude that this person must be crazy. And as a result, they will recommend psychological evaluation for that person. You can see the way this is gonna go and the way it is going right now. As good people, helpless people that are being abused and tortured and enslaved and experimented upon. In America today, American citizens cry out for help from their fellow Americans and their fellow Americans say, why don't you take some Prozac because we think you're schizophrenic? Well, this is a highly technical program. All of the symptoms are induced by a technology that is so fucking sophisticated. It is horrifying
Video Transcript AI Summary
The video discusses the potential of brain-computer interfaces, brain-cloud interfaces, and the implications of connecting human brains to supercomputers. It explores the ability to hack humans through advanced technology and the development of brain machine interfaces. Various projects such as the BRAIN Initiative and companies like Neuralink are highlighted as pioneers in this field. The video also touches on the ethical concerns and the possibility of creating a brain net that could revolutionize communication and connectivity.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Interface between the human brain and both biological and nonbiological computing systems. This level of technology could include brain to brain interfaces, brain to computer interfaces, and specifically brain to cloud interfaces. Technology linking the brain to the cloud could drastically alter the state of communications between humans and machines. So in order for this to become possible, the study noted that data transfer between living human brains and the cloud would likely require the use of supercomputers with artificial intelligence algorithms. Such a breakthrough in technology has the power to transform communications, education, work, and the world as we know it. But with the requirement of tiny devices being inserted into your brain in order to access the cloud, it remains to be seen just how many people will be willing to participate. Speaker 1: Biological knowledge multiplied by computing power, multiplied by data equals the ability to hack humans. And the AI revolution or crisis is not just AI, it's also bio biology, it's biotech. Speaker 2: The BRAIN Initiative is a $6,000,000,000 fund to find new ways to map the activity of an entire brain. Leading neuroscientist, professor Rafael Joust, was at the front of the neuroscientist professor Rafael Just was at the front of the queue for funding. Speaker 1: We're not talking about data privacy. This is much worse. We're talking about the content Speaker 3: of your money. Speaker 1: And maybe I'll explain what it means, the ability to hack humans, to create an algorithm that understands me better than I understand myself and can The goal of the branch here is precisely to build a method The goal of the brain initiative is precisely to build methods to read and manipulate the activity of neurons. Circuits. Speaker 4: To build a mathematical model or decoder that accurately predicts how the brain extracts meaning. Speaker 5: Here's, an ocean scene. You can see it gets fish. You can see it gets water, swimming, ocean floor. Speaker 4: Gallant says practical applications could one day include brain machine interfaces that would allow communication without speech. Speaker 5: That's why the European Union and president Barack Obama wanna spend $1,000,000,000, a $1,000,000,000 to map the brain. You see, once you map the brain, then you can begin to connect the mind to computer. Speaker 2: Elon Musk's latest company, Neuralink, aims to enhance humans by connecting them to computers. DARPA, the research and development arm of the American military, is also at the forefront of this technology. Enough research is now being done on brain computer interfaces, but it's time to think hard about their potential implications. The matrix is imminent. Speaker 6: I'm a former naval officer. I graduated the United States Naval Academy. I have a degree in control systems engineering. I worked as a surface warfare officer in electronics warfare and nuclear engineering jobs. Speaker 5: While I was in Speaker 6: the service, I found out there's an ongoing nonconsensual human experiment, and it's testing a human machine interface well. Speaker 3: So there's no need for external hardware. Once we tap into the brain, if we have algorithms that stimulate the right things and give it the right data, we could literally see a screen pop up and we call it hallucinating. Right? But, these would be controlled, hallucination run by algorithms that would give us everything AR would without any glass. Speaker 7: This technology can be used to feed images and even motion pictures into one's brain. Images and motion pictures that are so realistic that you think you're actually watching a movie or seeing something in reality. It's like a virtual reality 3 d rendering that takes place within the target's mind. Speaker 3: So there's no need for external hard way. Once we tap into the brain, if we have algorithms that stimulate the right things and give it the right data, we could literally see a screen pop up. We call it hallucinating. Right? But, these would be control, hallucination run by algorithms that would give us everything AR would without any glasses. Speaker 5: And that's exactly how they manipulate someone's thoughts. They send voices into someone's head. They manipulate their emotions. They manipulate their behavior. Speaker 3: And we call it hallucinating. Right? But these would be controlled, hallucination Speaker 7: human beings and their fellow human beings say, what is it that's happening to you? The target will then say, I'm hearing voices inside my head. Speaker 3: But these would be controlled, hallucinations run by algorithms. Speaker 7: And they will conclude that this person must be crazy. And as a result, they will recommend psychological evaluation abused and tortured abused and tortured and enslaved and experimented upon in America today, American citizens cry out for help from their fellow Americans, and their fellow Americans say, why don't you take some Prozac because we think you're schizophrenic? When this is a highly technical program, all of the symptoms But these would be the cold, Speaker 3: hallucination. But these would be controlled, hallucination run by algorithms that would give us everything AR would without any glasses. The system then takes those those algorithms and and correlates, communication and behavior data. And I say communication and behavior data. What remotely measured, and then integrated back into RNA data, for the purposes of creating a cognitive model with the consumer. But if you're looking at connecting our brains to the Internet, one of the things we'll be able to do is we'll be to outsource functions of our brain. Speaker 5: Directly to the cloud. Speaker 3: It's automatically probably being stored in the cloud for you without you thinking about it. Just like these automatic backups on your computer. Speaker 4: This military now looks to take the newer technology to a completely next level. Speaker 5: This will replace the Internet. It'll become a brain net. We imagine what tomorrow holds and make it happen by deciding what to do today. In a way, the future shapes the now. Think of a world where all things are connect.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Technology is advancing towards connecting the human brain directly to computers through implantable neural interfaces. DARPA's Neural Engineering System Design (NESD) program aims to refine this technology for finer control and faster communication. Concerns arise about potential weaponization and misuse of brain sciences for political and military purposes. Scientists envision a future where nanobots connect our brains to the cloud, creating a "brain net" that replaces the Internet. The use of nano materials for remote brain manipulation is discussed, raising ethical and security implications.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Technology to a completely next level. Speaker 1: This will replace the Internet. It'll become a brain net. Speaker 2: We imagine what tomorrow holds and make it happen by deciding what to do today. In a way, the future shapes the now. Think of a world where all things are connected, a world with artificial intelligence everywhere. This is the vision that leads us to the cloud. The cloud has become a force Speaker 1: net. Speaker 3: They call this technological subreality, the cloud. Speaker 4: Directly connect to the cloud. Speaker 5: That's what the European Union and president Barack Obama wanna spend $1,000,000,000, a $1,000,000,000 to map the brain. But you see, once you map the brain, then you can begin to connect the mind to computers. Speaker 1: The researchers work on opposite sides of the campus and through the Internet. Rao, the sender, sits in front of the computer game in which he has to defend a city by firing a cannon. Staco, the receiver, with no ability to see the game and his hand positioned over a touch pad that will fire the cannon, waits for a command directly from Rao's brain. Speaker 0: The research is conducted by the US Military's Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency or DARPA, which we know too well by these robot videos. Speaker 6: And they're talking about their program, restoring restoring active memory. Look at that acronym, RAM. Does that sound familiar? If you know anything about a computer, it does. RAM is the computer's memory. Speaker 7: I'm a former naval officer. I'm a graduate of the United States Naval Academy. Speaker 6: I have Speaker 7: a degree in control systems engineering. I worked as a surface warfare officer in electronics warfare and nuclear engineering jobs. While I was in the service, I found out there's an ongoing nonconsensual human experiment, and it's testing a human machine interface with us. Speaker 6: And, of course, part of that program is Obama's BRAIN Initiative, a multibillion dollar program. DARPA's got a huge chunk of that. Speaker 5: A $1,000,000,000 a $1,000,000,000 to map the brain. But you see, once you map the brain, then you can begin to connect the mind to computers. Speaker 0: The new program is called Neural Engineering System Design or NESD, which aims to develop an implantable neural interface connecting humans directly to computers. Philip Rivel, the NESD manager for DARPA said, its goal was to upgrade the tools that we have to really open the channel between the human brain and modern electronics. At the moment, human computer interfaces are able to connect between a 100 and a 1000 brain neurons to a machine at the time. DARPA aims to refine this technology to connect individual neurons. This will give much finer control, reduce noise, and speed up communications between a human and a computer. Speaker 6: So, basically, they're they look at you as essentially a computer that they can hack. That's why they're talking about brain hacking. That's why they're talking about their RAM program. We should be very concerned if they were genuinely concerned about medical issues. And, of course, that's not at all what the defense department and DARPA are focused on. They're about creating war machines. Okay? They're not about doing medical research. If they had any real concern about the veterans, they would be doing something for them in just ordinary care at the VA. So you should be very skeptical of anything that they tell you. If they do come up with a treatment, will they make it available to the vets? I seriously doubt it. They're always saying they're gonna do that. We should remember the history of what they did to World War 2 veterans with PTSD. They gave them lobotomies. Speaker 0: DARPA's website confirms the news also citing that among the program's potential applications are devices that could possible with current technology. Considering that DARPA's research has an end goal of military application, it's not hard to imagine where that could be used. Speaker 6: And, of course, they're being joined by Lawrence Livermore National Labs. They have, get this, high fidelity neural recordings. They're trying to do everything they can to map and to record your memory. It's not enough for them to record all of our metadata, not enough for them to record all of our phone conversations as the former head of the NSA said. He said they want total population control. That's how you do it with these BRAIN projects. Speaker 1: Out of disclosure, some of the work that I'm doing here today is funded by the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratories. I'm also funded by the European Union Human Brain Project, specifically the sub project 12 where I'm task leader for dual use brain science. And I've also done some ongoing work with the strategic multi level assessment crew over the past 10 years at Pentagon, the dot Avayan's group, and with DARPA. Speaker 2: Military agenda is interested Speaker 1: on the potential weaponization and misuse Speaker 2: of the brain sciences for nefarious agenda Speaker 1: for political intelligence and military use. Speaker 5: So that's why the European Union and president Barack Obama wanna spend a $1,000,000,000 $1,000,000,000 to map the brain. But you see, once you map the brain, then you can begin to connect the mind to computers. Speaker 2: A group of scientists say we are closer than ever to creating technology, which can emerge with human biology in order to access the cloud in real time. Speaker 4: We will have nanobots that we can feed into our brain that directly connect to the cloud. Speaker 8: We will connect wirelessly our NeoProtechs in the cloud. Speaker 1: This will replace the Internet. It'll become a brain net. Speaker 3: And the whole agenda is for, humanity to have technology put inside the body, inside the brain. Nanotechnology various other things. Nanobots, various other things. And that this technology will connect the human mind to what I've been writing about for years and called the technological sub reality. But the people like Kurzweil, who set up this singularity university, with others, they call this Speaker 8: the cloud. We will connect wirelessly Speaker 1: our new potential cloud. This will replace the Internet. It'll become a brain net. Note, this has not been directly addressed nor has it been entertained by any United States government entity in a public forum. What has gone from the drawing board to the reality is this, the use of neural interfacing and physiological interfacing to the idea of remote controlled small scale systems to create a nano swarm of biopentrable materials that you cannot see, that can penetrate all the most robust biochemical filters that are able to integrate themselves through a variety of membranes, mucus membranes, and wherever mouth, nose, ears, eyes, and they can be done in such a level that their presence is almost impossible to detect. And as such, into the brain function in real time, remotely. And by affecting the way that brain is built and the way it functions, influence in ways that are kinetic and non kinetic, the attitudes, beliefs, thoughts, emotions, activities, and relative vulnerabilities and predispositions of those individuals for whom they threaten. It used to be that I need to be exceedingly close to someone to now influence them with a weapon, And now, what we see is we create both digital potential as well as much more capable potential to affect them in a variety of different ways. Take a look. This is the front of my pen. This amount of nano material, if we able to maintain and sustain with regard to its deliverability and aerosolization, could in fact affect all of you. Look at this. Look at this. I'm carrying that material. You see it? Would I have to lug a giant weapon into the room? No, I wouldn't. And what if in fact, I utilize some form of an unmanned aerial device or unmanned ground device as delivery vehicle, something like a drone or a bug. Could I do something with that? The answer is increasingly yes. Not a month goes by where I don't get a call at my institute by someone telling me that someone in the government implanted these things in their brain without them knowing. I'm not kidding.

@Yohmini2 - Yoh Mini

By May 2024 the United Nations World Health Organization (#WHO) could be earth’s first truly global government. Through the combination of a new global pandemic accord called “Pandemic Prevention, Preparedness, and Response,” ( #PPPR ) and amendments to the 2005 International Health Regulations( #IHR ), the documents as presently drafted “would fundamentally change the relationship between the WHO, its Member States, and naturally their populations.” There will exist is a non-accountable system of governance. We're undergoing a #softCoup... under the pretext of pandemic preparedness  ( the #PPPR  )and the biosecurity agenda ( = #OneHealth )." #DrMerylNass explains how the #WHO's proposed pandemic treaty will enable the WHO "to take over jurisdiction of everything in the world by saying that climate change, animals, plants, water systems [and] ecosystems are all central to health". In addition to that, it will remove human rights protections, enforce censorship and digital passports, require governments to push a single "official" narrative, and enable the WHO to declare "pandemics" on a whim. Credit:  @wideawake_media & @NassMeryl More info on her website 👇 http://doortofreedom.org/ 👇 Here you can find  Current And Past Drafts Of The WHO’s Proposed Pandemic Treaty, The Proposed Changes To The International Health Regulations, And The UN’s Proposed Emergency Platform And Pandemic Plans.

Video Transcript AI Summary
In May 2024, the WHO may become a global government with the Pandemic Prevention Preparedness and Response accord. This grants power to one unelected individual to declare global health emergencies, suspend laws, and compel vaccination or incarceration. The accord also promotes the one health ideology to control populations and resources. These changes signal a significant loss of liberty. The Bible foretold a global crisis where governments would control individual conscience. Subscribe to HorizonWatch for more updates. God prevails in the end.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In May 2024, the United Nations World Health Organization, the WHO, could be Earth's first truly global government. Through the combination of a new global pandemic accord called the Pandemic Prevention Preparedness and Response, PPPR, and the amendments to the 2005 International Health Regulations, the IHR, the documents as presently drafted quote, would fundamentally change the relationship between the WHO, its member states, and naturally their populations, unquote. There will exist a non accountable fascist system of governance. WHO is a global bureaucracy of appointees Starting in 1948, the goal was access to better health. But since the year 2000, WHO has become heavily dependent on private foundations and pharmaceutical companies for funding. WHO amended its pandemic Herd immunity was also redefined and mass vaccination Herd immunity was also redefined, and mass vaccination became the main thing. Abandoning its stated principles, the WHO now mines the machinery of global population control. Now according to the Brownstone Institute's David Bell, quote, the WHO proposes that the term with full respect for the dignity, human rights, and fundamental freedoms of persons be deleted from the text of the IHR replacing them with equity, coherence, and inclusivity. Vague terms, the applications of which are then specifically differentiated in the text according to levels of social and economic development. The underlying equality of individuals is removed and rights become subject to a status determined by others based on a set of criteria that they define, unquote. Under the new IHR article 13 a, states are required to follow WHO recommendations and could be compelled to incarcerate, inject, require identification of medical status, medically examine, isolate, and or restrict the travel of individuals. So there you've got a digital ID, all over the place. Now the proposed legally binding agreements would incorporate wos and WOG models of operation. Whole of society and whole of government. Now these envisioned the enlistment of people at all levels in the support of a single narrative for the common good. Government, the medical cartel, social and other media, banks, lawyers, and other professionals would be mustered in support of a single preferred story handed down by the WHO. The WOS approach, whole of society means that religious organizations, churches, churches owning hospitals, etcetera, will be expected to support a single story. The proposed accord especially addresses wrong thing. In article 1 c, the proposed PPPR Accord defines terms. Quote, infodemic means too much information. False or misleading information in digital and physical environments during a disease outbreak. It causes confusion and risk taking behaviors that can harm health. It also leads to mistrust of health authorities and undermines the public health and social measures. Unquote. Yeah. Too much information during a a global public health emergency? What's that? That means information that they don't like or don't want you to have. Now article 18 1 of the PPPR Accord says this, quote, the parties shall strengthen science, public health, then pandemic literacy in the population, as well as access to information on pandemics and their effects and drivers. He goes on to say that they will combat false misleading, misinformation, or disinformation, including through effective international collaboration and cooperation as referred to in Article 16, unquote. So, yes, somebody, of these unelected elites declares that certain information is false or misleading or disinformation. And now here comes the censor with his scissors. Governments signing the accord are required to act against content having been labeled as false, misleading, misinformation, or disinformation. But how can this commitment be reconciled with America's constitutional right to free speech? Now a special concern it under the PPPR are the powers that are granted to the WHO Director General. Quote, the Director General shall determine on the basis of information received, in particular from the state party within whose territory any event is occurring, whether an event constitutes a public health emergency of International Concern in accordance with the criteria and procedures set out in these regulations. So this empowers a single individual to declare a PHEIC, a public health emergency of international concern. With one stroke, you see. One stroke of his pen, such a declaration enables the local rule of law to be replaced by the WHO's rule of emergency. Now the accord also requires nations to embrace WHO's one health emphasis. One health is a technocratic approach combining study and management of people, animals, plants, and the environment. While seeking to study interrelationships and gain new insights, it also proposes to manage these resources globally. The United States CDC has already adopted the one health approach advocated by the UN, the world economic forum, and others. The PPPR requires signatory nations to adopt the one health approach. One health is is broader than many realize. Do you know that it actually includes the global food supply? So revelation 13 verse 16 describes a global economic lockout of those who resist the exercise of power to compel conscience. The machinery to enforce compliance on a global scale has never before existed and would have to be deployed before enacting such commands. So in summary, the pandemic prevention preparedness and response accord due to be signed in in May 2024, along with changes to WHO International Health Regulations. I don't know how else to say it. It's ominous. These changes include granting powers to 1 unelected individual to declare a to declare a public health emergency anywhere globally suspending the rule of law. The power to compel persons to be vaccinated or incarcerated, the use of 1 health ideology to control human populations and climate resources, including food on the basis of climate change theory and heralds an unprecedented surrender of liberty. Interestingly, 2000 years ago, bible prophecy foretold a crisis, global in scope, in which governments would exercise force over individual conscience, isn't it time to look again at what the Bible has foretold was coming? Hey. I'm Larry Kirkpatrick with HorizonWatch. Make sure you subscribe to this newsletter and get some other people. If people are sleeping, maybe you can wake them up. Subscribe to the newsletter, download it, print it out, and share with some people. You know what? We're really living in weird times. But there's good news ahead. God wins in the end.
Video Transcript AI Summary
We are facing a soft coup to create new laws under the guise of pandemic preparedness, removing human rights protections. The WHO is developing a pandemic treaty to enforce surveillance, censorship, and a single narrative. Vaccines could be developed in 100 days. Amendments will make state recommendations enforceable, provide a liability shield, remove intellectual property rights, enforce digital passports, and allow the WHO to dictate drug use during a pandemic. One Health aims to expand WHO jurisdiction by linking health to climate change, animals, and ecosystems, suggesting humans are not more valuable than animals.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We're undergoing a soft coup, and the idea is to create a whole new set of laws and ignore the existing human rights laws and other laws under the pretext of pandemic preparedness and the biosecurity agenda. The WHO is developing through all its nations, but with the WHO director in the United States in charge, a pandemic treaty and amendments to the existing international health regulations that will remove the human rights protections currently, embedded in the IHRs, will enforce surveillance censorship, get rid of freedom of speech, require governments to censor and only push a single narrative. Also, we will be sub subject, if if they can make this work, to vaccines developed in a 100 days, which the organization CEPI is planning to do. And one of the people who founded CEPI was Jeremy Farrar, who is now the chief scientist at the WHO, to bring this forward. Other things that amendments do is to bind the state so there are no longer recommendations, but enforceable edicts. Provide a liability shield, get rid of intellectual property rights, move supplies from one country to another, enforce digital passports, and the director general of who can demand that a pandemic or a potential pandemic exists. He can just declare it with no standards, and then countries around the world will have to obey. Also, the who will tell you what drugs you can and can't use in your nation once a pandemic is declared. Obviously, the budget will increase. One Health is another part of this. One Health is a concept that was created to enable the WHO, with these documents, to take over jurisdiction of everything in the world by saying that climate change, animals, plants, water systems, ecosystems are all central to health. Also embedded in this concept is a peculiar notion that humans are no longer of greater value than animals.
Video Transcript AI Summary
One Health is a movement that emphasizes the interconnectedness of human, animal, and environmental health. It encourages collaboration among various partners to monitor and control public health threats and understand how diseases spread among people, animals, plants, and the environment.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: One Health is a growing movement to better understand these connections and recognize that the health of people is inextricably linked with the health of animals and our shared environment. One Health calls on human, animal, environmental health, and other relevant partners to work together with a focus on communication, coordination, and collaboration to monitor and control public health threats and learn about how diseases spread among people, animals, plants, and the environment.
Home We are Door to Freedom, founded by Meryl Nass, a new organization formed to help people make sense of a rapidly changing and often confusing world. doortofreedom.org

@Yohmini2 - Yoh Mini

Click on post 4 all info #SabrinaWallace clip one post above 👇

@Yohmini2 - Yoh Mini

#Whistleblower from the top end of the #Spystate: #SabrinaWallace Wireless tissue engineering & Mind Control- over the #WBAN 802.15.6 network. #4IR #IoB #Transhumanism #MindControl #BiodigitalConvergence #TI 👇 With links to documentation 👀👀👀🎯 👇 tinyurl.com/SW-IoB

@Yohmini2 - Yoh Mini

@Yohmini2 - Yoh Mini

Follow !!!! 👉👀@zeee_media To find out more about 👇 #4IR #NWO #biodigitalConvergence #Ai #NanoTech A #MustWatch !! to catchup #MariaZeee 👇 tinyurl.com/MZ-UNA45

Video Transcript AI Summary
In August 2023, I released a 4-part series exposing the technocratic AI world society being built, linking central bank digital currency, social credit systems, and mind control to the UN's vision for a global government in the metaverse. People are referred to as objects in this dystopian society without their consent. The series compiles research on futurists' vision, UN goals, and existing technology enabling this reality. Watch, research, and share this important information.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In August of 2023, I put out a 4 part series called AI Apocalypse UN 100 Agenda 2045 Exposed. This was on uncensored on the Stu Peters network. And as I said, it was released in 4 parts, and in my opinion, this is one of the most important bodies of work that I've put out there because it really exposes the technocratic totalitarian AI world society that they are building, and it really does link the central bank digital currency, the social credit system, and really mind control, altogether to explain how all of this fits in with the UN's vision for 1 world government, 1 world society inside the metaverse, if you will, although they call it the AI World Society. And in this world society, they refer to you as an object. They say that they've entered you into a new social contract as an AI world citizen, and, of course, this has been done without consultation of everyday people that are now being referred to as objects inside the AI World Society. I mean, it really is very dystopian. But because this series was so important, we wanted to put it together in one video. We know that a lot of people have seen the series and shared it, but in the event that anyone missed it or in the event that they want it in one video, we wanted to put it all together for you. So the next few hours, again, is the result of many, many hours of research and reading these people's own documents. We take you through the vision of the futurists, if you will, the vision of the UN, and some of the technology that's already in existence that makes this possible. It's not an exhaustive list, but by all means, we encourage everyone to watch, pay attention, conduct your own research, and please share this everywhere.

@Yohmini2 - Yoh Mini

Click on post 4 all info 👇

@Yohmini2 - Yoh Mini

#AI #SuperComputer4SDGs #4IR #IoB #WBAN #QuantumComputing #Metaverse DNA TECHNOLOGY, QUANTUM COMPUTERS AND THE JABS #AnthonyPatch ( @anthonypatch3 http://anthonypatch.com , odysee.com/@anthonypatcho…… ) & #PaulMcGuire ( @radiomcguire ) Watch more 👇 tinyurl.com/PMcG-RC 👇 & see commentsection

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the Adiabatic Quantum Computer, equivalent to 7 billion human brains, connected to the Large Hadron Collider. The computer communicates with another dimension, altering DNA through the mark of the beast, leading to mind control. This advanced system aims to surpass human intelligence, forming the basis of the Beast system in Revelation.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Now, let's get back to Speaker 1: the to the b system because, obviously, the b system is in the bible in numerous places. Revelation 13 especially with the false prophet and the antichrist and the mark of the beast, which could be a microchip implant, nano chip, whatever. You talk about, it's difficult for me to pronounce the name of the computer. Speaker 0: Adiabatic. The Adiabatic without heat processed, adiabatic Speaker 1: Mhmm. Quantum computer. AQC is the easy way to talk about it. AQC. Okay. Now you relate this to the b system. I wanna find out why. Sure. But you you tell us and I want our viewers to grasp this, that Speaker 0: this are they building this computer now? It's already been built in the model 2048. They started with a 128 model. Not the year, but the model number. 048. Right. Speaker 1: It's it's already built. Speaker 0: Well, there have been multiple generations that Speaker 1: have been built. But but the Speaker 0: early stages, like, early after 1 was 2,008. Wow! The 2,048 was released to the public in January of last year, 2015. Now Speaker 1: you describe it as equivalent to 7,000,000,000 human brains. Has this computer reached that level yet? Speaker 0: Yes. So this computer, Speaker 1: how big is it by the way, physically? Speaker 0: Well, interestingly, it's housed in a black cube. Can you say Mecca? Right. Black sun, the worship of and we go to 2,001 with the obelisk, right? It wasn't a cube, but it was a black rectangle. Speaker 1: How big of a black cube is that? Speaker 0: So we're talking about something about the size of this stage here in the studio. Speaker 1: So so this computer is about a black cube cube about the size of this television set Speaker 0: Right. Speaker 1: And yet it has the intelligence and memory or whatever that's equivalent to 7,000,000,000 human brains. Speaker 0: That's correct. Now, this is a housing, this is a shield that separates it from all electromagnetic interference to maintain the stability of the processor. Okay. It's what's called coherence and decoherence in computer science. But inside the cube is something that is arranged just like the spinal column of a human and it has what are known as cubits that are essentially constructed of gold but other components, but these are not transistor based. Cubits are a complete departure the transistors which are Silicon Gate Model Processors. This is a complete quantum leap into another way of processing information. And it does so, so quickly that it has no relevance, no comparison to the gate model transistor based even transistor quantum computer. So we are talking about something that most people who have not studied the adiabatic quantum computer process can't wrap their heads around. It's a very deep topic, but I want to be succinct here. It operates interdimensional. When I spoke of earlier that they are already communicating with the other side without having opened a gateway, a portal, a physical portal in the dimension, They are communicating using this computer because and this comes right from the manufacturers, this is public disclosure information. I didn't have to get this in a secretive manner. They do what are called combinatorial programming. They take all possible solutions and at one time feed it into the machine through an interface which happens to be a black cube itself, the interface device and by their own admission it enters into another dimension where the processing takes place and then they extract from that other dimension the solution to the combinatorial problem. That is communication with an actual physical tool to another dimension. Speaker 1: Now, when it's communicating to another dimension, is it communicating to a consciousness or an intelligence in another dimension? Speaker 0: Yes. It is. Yes. Because it happens definitively, repeatedly, measurably. They are able to do this consistently. There was a lot of doubt in the transistor based world of quantum computing that the company that put this Quantum or Cubit based processor together that they really were achieving any definitive answers and that were reliable and coherent, okay, that were stable. But they have proven over and over again. Let me give you one example of who is purchasing Google. The first model was purchased by Lockheed and USC with an open public computer laboratory that the public can access with their first model and it has advanced through 5 12 model for example, where 2 of which were purchased by Google a few years ago, they now have the 2048. The 2,048 represents the number of cubits that is connected to the Large Hadron Collider for the purpose of opening the portal and maintaining the stability of it. Speaker 1: Okay. So, when you say this computer is connected to the Large Hadron Collider, it it somehow is electronically or something connected Speaker 0: to It's no different than our computer networking setup. Speaker 1: So it's it's networked into the Large Hadron Collider. Speaker 0: That's correct. Speaker 1: So we we have literally it's like reminds me of 2,001 A Space Odyssey. There's there's the ape Speaker 0: Pal 9000. Speaker 1: Yeah. And then there's the ape and the obelisk and then pal. Sure. And yet, I believe in the biblical worldview. Sure. But it would seem to me that with this level of 7,000,000,000 human brains of intelligence and and This is the b system. Yeah. The b system. It it seems to me that it is already well, it's already artificially intelligent. Absolutely. But it must be advanced self advancing itself. Yes. So it it it it's moving towards a singularity where its intelligence surpasses man. Mhmm. Speaker 0: That's correct. Do you Speaker 1: think it's already on the way to that? Speaker 0: It is. That is the goal. The question often arises, is it yet sentient? Is it self aware? Speaker 1: I don't believe it is. Okay. I Speaker 0: don't and I base that only on the evidence that I look at, at, not conjecture or speculation. I think it has. Speaker 1: So tell us how in a biblical sense this connects with the BEAST system in the book of Revelation. Speaker 0: Well, the Beast system we hear of, if you don't accept the mark of the beast then no man can buy or sell. All of that control mechanism. How do you control over 7,000,000,000 people? You have a computer that is equivalent to 7,000,000,000 people. That is why I cite that coming from the manufacturer's own citation. Okay. So I am just repeating their information but the point is, you have to have a sophisticated system to be able to control not just the movement of people and the movement of goods and transactions and governments, but the minds of people. You are creating a surf class of human beings. Right. When you accept the mark of the beast, you lose all awareness that you have even been modified. You don't even know that you've been changed. Speaker 1: So your memories erased like some of the sci fi movies? Speaker 0: Well, in the sense of your own self awareness, your own knowledge of your soul. Okay. Speaker 1: So when you take the biblical mark of the beast, which is technology, it's it's deeper than than it goes to the DNA. Tell us how it goes to the DNA. Speaker 0: This sounds far fetched, but when you accept the mark of the beast, what you are actually doing is accepting into your body and there will be numerous routes to this. This can be through inhalation of nanoparticles, This can be the acceptance of a vaccine for you and your children, your loved ones. Once it is introduced into the body by any route, it then is a modifier to the DNA. I call it the 3rd strand of DNA. We have a double helix, this is going to be a triple helix. This is an artificial construct that can be digitally imparted with information and then controlled from an external source. That control mechanism, the linkage comes through the electromagnetic connection. We can call it microwaves or whatever or ELF, extremely low frequency, be it whatever frequency, but that is the link to humans from that computer and that is the B system that controls us through our DNA which has been modified and then it changes our thought processes. It rewires our synapses in our own mind. Right. Because our brains are constructed from our DNA. Speaker 1: Right. Speaker 0: You modify the core, you modify the brain.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Cathy Li introduces the launch of the International Computation and AI Network of Excellence (ICON) with a panel of experts. State Secretary Faisel highlights Switzerland's motivation to address global AI imbalances and ensure AI benefits all. Switzerland aims to prevent AI from becoming a driver of global inequality and supports the United Nations' efforts in AI governance. The initiative emphasizes Switzerland's leadership in AI research and commitment to equitable international cooperation through Geneva.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Thank you so much for being part of this very pivotal moment in the advancement of Global artificial intelligence. My name is Cathy Li. I'm the Head of Center for the Force Industrial Revolution and also Head of AI, Data and Metaverse. Today, we are thrilled to announce the launch of an ambitious and also transformative initiative, the International Computation and AI Network of Excellence or ICON, as we say. I'm privileged to be accompanied today by a panel of esteemed experts. Joining me today is, to my immediate left, Alex Fronde Fasel, State Secretary of the Swiss Federal Department of Foreign Affairs, FDFA. Next to him, Professor Christian Wolfram, vice president of, Wolfram, Swiss AI and, next to him, Professor, Bernhard Schonkoff, excuse me if I get the name wrong, director, Max Planck Institute For Intelligent System and Atlas Chair. And next to him is Professor, Ki Sierra Manna, board chair, Data Science Africa. This initiative is a big step in rebalancing global AI efforts led by the Swiss Foreign Ministry and involves Swiss AI leaders such as the Federal Institute of Technology in Zurich, ETH Zurich and the Federal Institute of Technology in Lausanne, EPFL as well as ICON is a unique collaboration. It brings together the government, private sector, civil society, academia to tackle the power, imbalances and societal issues linked to AI. This initiative also shares a common perspective with the World Economic Forum's AI governance alliance and aligning with AIGA's mission and core working areas. Today's press conference marks the official start of ICON's incubation phase, a crucial step in their mission to promote large scale AI research and development across different fields. This initiative goes beyond just technology. It aligns with the United Nations' sustainable development goals to ensure that AI progress benefits all of humanity. So my first question is to you, State Secretary Faisel. Can you please provide some insights into Switzerland's specific motivations and also objectives for participating in this extremely important initiative. Speaker 1: Thank you very much, Kathy. We all know that AI is amongst the key technologies of our time and that it will have a lasting impact on society, the economy, politics and that it will have an important probably determining role to play in tackling the global challenges we face as an international community, be it climate change, pandemics, economic inequality and so on. Now unfortunately, not all countries have the same access to the resources needed to implement AI projects. And so if we do not change that, if we do not address this problem, then potentially artificial intelligence becomes a driver of a new global inequality. At the moment where we are fast closing the digital gap, we must avoid opening AI gap. And so with ICANN, we believe that we can ensure that all voices are heard in AI research and that AI solutions are perceived as a global public goods, that are available to everyone around the globe and that is our approach and you mentioned the United Nations. So in this way with that project, we are able to specifically support what the United Nations are doing notably through its high level advisory board on AI to which the head of the AI Center of ETH, Professor Andreas Krause has been appointed. And so our commitment emphasizes Switzerland's leading position in an eye research, but is also an expression of Switzerland's constant concern and engagement for an equitable international order brought about notably through this leading location center of global governance, which is Geneva.
Video Transcript AI Summary
AI is a crowded space, but ICANN stands out with its mission to bridge the gap in AI capabilities between developed and developing countries. Transparency and openness are key factors that set ICANN apart from other projects, especially those with a more commercial focus. This focus on equality and distribution is crucial in the discussion on the risks and benefits of AI.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: AI is a very crowded space as you say, but when you look at this space, then you immediately recognize the specific mission and unique position of ICANN. When you look at Europe, for example, with the European Lumi and Swiss Alps, we have 2 of the most modern and powerful supercomputers in the world. But in developing countries, you do not have such capabilities. And again, that can create a new equality and open a new gap. And the mission of the ICANN is to precisely fight this gap and prevent it. Speaker 1: Thank you. Let me go to, Professor Wolfram. What would you say like what distinguish, you know, ICON from other projects, especially the more you know, the ones that usually engage with the more commercial model? Speaker 2: Yes. So, I think one big aspect that has been touched upon in some of the comments is really the aspect of transparency and openness. There's a huge discussion on the dangers of AI and how to make it equal distributed. And I think one aspect in that area is really that it is
Video Transcript AI Summary
The 4th industrial revolution changes us by integrating technology into our bodies through the Internet of Bodies. This ecosystem connects devices collecting health data and altering functions. Artificial intelligence automates learning and computation, impacting all aspects of life from diet to genetic health. This constant assessment raises concerns about privacy and control.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: They call it part of the 4th industrial revolution. One of the features of this 4th industrial revolution is that it doesn't change what we are doing, but it changes us. Speaker 1: The very idea of human being some sort of natural concept is really gonna change. Up Up until now, the conversation we've been having is around freedom of speech. Once we can access people's thoughts and access people's emotions Speaker 0: The focus is, all of you know today, is on what's now called the Internet of Bodies, involving medical implants and other kinds of devices that go inside your body, and altogether with the Internet as a whole, comprise the Internet of bodies. Speaker 2: The Internet of bodies or IOB is, is actually an ecosystem. It's a bunch of devices that are connected to the internet that contain software and that either collect personal health data about you or can alter the body's function. We think of the internet of bodies as this collection of all these devices, as well as all the data that the devices are gathering about you. And in healthcare, it's Internet of bodies has has been around for quite a while. Speaker 3: So the Internet of bodies, imagine the power of AI. What is artificial intelligence? It's a way to automate computation and cognition. So we can now automate learning, perceiving, doing computation. It's a pervasive general purpose technology that will be used in all of our industries that will come into our professional networks, our private networks, our schools, our industries and our offices. What I wanted to epitomize with the Internet of bodies is this notion that we will be under assessment, we will be under measure of computation in every aspect of our lives in the future, from what you eat, who you date, what you buy on the Internet, how much energy you use, but also what are your vital signs, or what are you doing in terms of health. What kind of specific genetic quirks do you have? What's your genome telling about your health, about your mental health, about how well you are doing, how well you are aging, what kind of disease you are susceptible to. Speaker 0: It has a bit of an Orwellian twinge to it. Speaker 3: Well
Anthony Patch - Home anthonypatch.com

@Yohmini2 - Yoh Mini

Click on post 4 all info 👇

@Yohmini2 - Yoh Mini

Click on repost below 4 all info #AI #DWave #QuantumComputing #BCI #WBAN #Energyharvesting #DigitalTwin = matrix being built for the #4IR , and ready to be implemented under the guise of #OneHealth to "tackle" the ( on purpose created ) "ClimateChangeCrisis" by GeoEngeneering the environment, and install the #NWO of total control of everything, including your body, mind & soul!!

Video Transcript AI Summary
The video discusses how elites are using technology to manipulate reality and control human consciousness. They are creating a digital model of Earth and individuals to monitor and influence behavior. Through AI, quantum computing, and DNA processing, they aim to connect human brains to a digital world, ultimately altering human consciousness. This technology allows for manipulation of thoughts, emotions, and behaviors through frequencies and digital signals. The goal is to create a new world where physical, biological, and digital dimensions merge, leading to a profound transformation in society.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Exactly. Magic is a technology that hasn't been discovered yet. They are building false realities into which they want to induct you so they can play God. The elite literally believe inter dimensionally, they were given this information and then built it. And here's the thing, they built it. And Google admits, even a data dumpster wired 2 years ago, that they're building an AI that will end human consciousness free will and take over, and the next species will rise out of that. They built it. Speaker 1: You're talking about the elites and inter dimensional signals that they're receiving that are telling us to lower our IQ. You can't just say that. Speaker 0: We need proof. Okay. Let me give you proof. Speaker 2: This is an article from 10 years ago. Sentient World, War Games on the Grandest Scale. The DOD is developing a parallel to planet Earth with billions of individual nodes to reflect every man, woman, and child this side of the dividing line between reality and AR. Speaker 3: This was a white paper put out by Purdue University in 2,006, and the sentient world simulation, planet within this computer matrix as a node, and every node is given an avatar and identifier. Speaker 4: We're now at this year where we can interconvert the biological and digital information. And so one implication of that is to be able to send biology as a digital magnetic wave. And we've been working with NASA on a sending unit. Speaker 5: They're not terrifically powerful yet, but they're doing something completely It gives these computers access to these new resources, maybe you could call them parallel universes, in order to do something that you couldn't otherwise do. Speaker 3: And that is the electromagnetic linking between a genetically modified human comprised of third strand of DNA and the adiabatic quantum computer. Speaker 6: So the reason why I want you to be close attention to building out those big black boxes is that inside those boxes is a point, a chip upon which is happening something that has never happened in the history of the Earth. It's an engineering thing which has become a nexus point for all these parallel realities. The physical point inside of one of those boxes. You can see that there's a portal. Speaker 5: And when you increase the number of these devices, you every time you add 1 of these qubits, you double the number of these parallel universes that you have access to until such time when you get to a chip like this, which is about 500 of these bits, you have something like 2 to the 500th power of these guys living in that chip. Speaker 7: How many of you are having trouble with this notion of digital code going over the Internet and the notion of something living that's being converted back and forth like that. I mean, do you have some sense of what is going on? Can a show of hands how many people had trouble grokking this idea? Speaker 4: So it's not like Star Trek teleportation where you could dematerialize and reappear. We could send your genetic code, but you'd reappear back as digital information. You can send DNA as ones and zeros and recapitulate it at the other end. So we've successfully and so with DARPA, we've built that synthetic and obviously receiving unit. Speaker 3: Essentially, it is, nano thin coating of gold that allows for the imparting of digital information onto that third strand of DNA and the adiabatic quantum computer. Speaker 5: They're going to do is apply this machine to an area that I think is fundamentally important. It's the crux of our future as humans. And that's, can we build machines like us? Speaker 8: The ultimate aim would be to archive enough data on each individual to be able to make a computer model of everyone on the planet. Speaker 9: Right now, we're inside a computer program. Speaker 10: Is it really so hard to believe? Speaker 4: What we're building in the computer databases represents real life and is both the information, that's necessary and sufficient to drive all DNA based life forms. Remember, going back Speaker 3: to the Centene Wolf simulation, peer reviewed white paper out of Purdue University in 2006. The program went live in 2007 describing humans as a node. And every person on the planet is represented in the computer software as a node, that's a data node, and given an avatar. Speaker 5: Robots are the smartest people. Artificial intelligence, AI. The idea is to port the software from the human brain. Speaker 11: It is called a digital twin, and it represents a new era in simulation, a new world of predictability, a promising new tool for engineering the future. A digital twin is a complete virtual prototype of an entire system. Speaker 5: Not just about slavery. It's ultimately about enslaving your soul. Speaker 12: Just think of the power of the combination of artificial intelligence, quantum computing and big data. So it's a combination of the different technologies which really bring the fundamental change. And finally, I think we have to be prepared for a world where we see a fusion of our physical, our digital, and our biological, dimensions. So it will be a world integrating the physical, biological, and, see, digital dimensions. So it will be a new world. And I'm looking for a minister in 10 years. Probably, it will be completely different from what it is Speaker 4: now. Google, Amazon, the NSA's, computing centers, data collection centers, like in Utah and Texas, all use D Wave's computers. But they never talk about networking them. They present it to the public as though they operate independently with independent organizations. So how independent is Google? Jeff Bezos, Amazon. Why is he partnered with Google and D Wave? Speaker 13: I became aware of, what I and our clients in Seattle, the Amazon Corporation. And I later learned that they were indeed experimenting with when I say experimenting voice to skull, hive mind behavior modification technology that is frequency based and directed at a targeted individual to basically control their entire person. Speaker 10: You are connected as an organic computer. I mean, this is this is one of the the most, quote, unquote, conspiratory theories that's been around for for for many, many, many, many years, decades. But the reality is is we're now facing the reality of that. It is no longer a conspiracy. The science is done, and you will see this. And this is the next step on from the virtual reality goggles. And this is why it terrifies me, and this is why I'm trying to wake people up. The way it Speaker 13: works is a device broadcast a radio frequency, let's say, at an individual. And that radio frequency will hook up with the resonance frequency of the individual's mind or body or in this case, DNA. Speaker 14: DNA stands for deoxyribonucleic acid, and it represents the genetic blueprint of all living creatures. It's also a unique computational element because it has extremely dense information storage, enormous parallelism, and extraordinary energy efficiency. Entities in both academia, government, and industry are working on this as we speak. We can think of the link as a brain computer interface, a tool that we can use to interface with the Internet. Speaker 9: The base pairs can be mounted into a train in a way that functions like a computer, like a logical element. Speaker 14: The DNA processor is a surface of origami. By that, I mean, that it is essentially a bunch of DNA strands that have been folded in ways similar to the techniques of Japanese paper folding. This lets us create DNA logic gates and the interconnects that link them. We can call these nano scale computational circuits made from synthetic DNA, DNA domino circuits. Speaker 9: It's like the old method with telephones, when you were dialing with sound. Every bass pair has their own has a resonant frequency. It's somewhere in the terahertz range. And if you hit the right frequency, it is opening like an conducting conducting, light conducting unit. And if you have a chain of these base pairs that react on different frequencies, you need a, a sequence of sounds to open all the fragments to make the entire thing conductive. Speaker 14: They break the loops in the transmission line strands and force them to bend over and link up with their neighbor strands, one after the other, like dominoes falling until they form a line of DNA on the substrate. Speaker 9: So it goes like do do do do do do and then the next part of the genetic thing is activated to either produce light or to produce poison. And this is something beautiful, out of their view of the world because if you bring this RNA or DNA into the human body, you can kind of take a radio signal and activate it from outside to produce any substance you want or to produce any light you want. Light is emotion. Light is thought. Light is everything. Everything we send is experience. Speaker 13: And what happens is between the broadcast frequency and the individual that's receiving the broadcast frequency, once it's resonating, once they are resonating together, a a superhighway of frequency along which information can be sent is created. And so you can dig into just like fiber optic cables that you use to send, signals over the Internet. I connect people to the Internet. It's the exact same thing, only a wireless application of that. And so once you have connected the targeted individual with the frequency, and they resonate together, then you have a perfect avenue upon which to send and receive information back and forth. And that's exactly how they manipulate someone's thoughts. They send voices into someone's head. They manipulate their emotions. They manipulate their behavior. And then that's also how they receive back from the individual real time. The vital signs, the emotions, the thoughts, what the person is seeing, what the person is hearing. And then all that information, of course, is rendered on a computer elsewhere via software and it can be monitored and tracked in real time. Speaker 4: And they had created a digital model of Earth and everybody in it down to a digital GPS coordinate model up to even a vertical dimension of 1 and a half centimeters. Every building, every roadway, everything. And what they wanna do is create an Internet of things where in digital space, they know exactly what you're doing in real time. Speaker 2: This is an article from 10 years ago. Sensient World War Games on the Grandest Scale. The VOD is developing a parallel to planet Earth with billions of individual nodes to reflect every man, woman, and child this side of the dividing line between reality and AR. Speaker 15: Humanity will be have their brains connected to artificial intelligence, and human consciousness, human thought, human emotion as we've known it will be over. Because every thought, every emotional response will come from

@Yohmini2 - Yoh Mini

Click on post 4 all info

@Yohmini2 - Yoh Mini

#BioDigitalConvergence #Books Referencematerial by #whistleblower #SabrinaWallace You can find here her library 👇 tinyurl.com/SW-Books

@Yohmini2 - Yoh Mini

@Yohmini2 - Yoh Mini

Click on post 4 all info #BiodigitalConvergence Get #Educated by #SabrinaWallace 👇 tinyurl.com/SabrinaWallace

Video Transcript AI Summary
Young nerds and hackers at Defcon are experimenting with radio frequencies, unaware of the synthetic biology behind BiFi and NeuroStrike. They discuss hacking the bioelectric code, incorporating the golden ratio and Schumann resonance. Topics include ant flocking, xenobots, and quantum technology in geoengineering. Urging Torrey community members to spread awareness, they emphasize the need for creative solutions and dialogue. The speaker expresses frustration with current societal apathy and calls for action.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Young nerds and hackers that are screwing around at Defcon with radio frequency, and the w band is old. They have no idea about the synthetic biology involved with the BiFi or your NeuroStrike on all those different papers I need to come back with the computer with so people can understand that when we're trying to talk to our loved ones and they're hearing us say different things, etcetera. Welcome to hacking the bioelectric code. The golden ratio is in nature. We hack that in the Schumann resonance because in order to hack the bioelectric code the human biofield and all the toroidal fields we have we had to change the response to the Schumann and the natural body response to the golden ratio. So all of you that are dreaming about ant flocking, the 100th monkey effect, they already coded for that computer code. They also made xenobots, organelles and organoids that reproduce from the air itself. That's why all the geoengineering and terraforming. We have a whole other quantum table of these Rydberg atom atomic fenestrations that are augmented with quantum technology available to the wireless sensor networks and geoengineering and the department of energy. And everybody's just sitting in their kill box. They have buttons. They have drop downs with the IRS, not just the FBI, etcetera. Here on the channel, we have prepared and spoken to people about all of this. So if you're in an area in which, especially pardon me, knows, if you're a Torrey community person, please, folks, make sure you've got copies of this. You can hand them to hand it to people. It's super easy for them to look through lots of big pictures so they know where to look in a book if they want to. We don't know what kind of creative ideas and mitigation people can come up with because we haven't been able to get people to talk about it. Well, let them run a few drones out there and just zap the fuck out of people. Have them explode into dust. I bet your people would be real interested then, won't they? I'm sorry. But that's the level we're at and that's what we're looking at. So God bless y'all out there. And let's do our best to edge and make Kate where we can. And I'll see y'all when I get back with the computer. I finished painting my wall, but I've been working on stuff all morning. So God bless you. See you soon.

@Yohmini2 - Yoh Mini

Click on post 4 all info

@Yohmini2 - Yoh Mini

#BioDigitalConvergence #Nanotech #4IR #WBAN #Gentech #GoF Follow 👇 tinyurl.com/SW-MBAN-291120… & see repost

Video Transcript AI Summary
The iGEM competition involves teams worldwide engineering organisms with new functions. One team created a 3D printer to produce hydrogels containing engineered e coli and yeast. They discussed the potential risks of reprogramming bacteria inside the body, emphasizing the importance of cybersecurity to prevent malicious attacks. The conversation highlighted concerns about security vulnerabilities in the cyber world and the potential for harm if communication is compromised. The discussion also touched on the need for secure precision AI healthcare and the risks associated with unsecured networks.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Stands for the International Genetically Engineered Machine Competition. It's a global synthetic biology competition that brings together teams from all around the world to compete in essentially engineering organisms to have new functions. Speaker 1: So we created a 3 d printer, which prints hydrogels, which has our e coli and yeast that which prints hydrogels, which has our e coli and yeast that has engineered pathways within it so that it can function to make the enzymes that produce our end product. Speaker 2: The yeast cultures that they grow and use for these electroceuticals, that's why rumble dad keeps pointing back to it. It's your gut brain axis. Now you don't have a digestive system anymore that's growing anything less than what they want it to, but welcome to your Alien movie with xenobots. That's synthetic biology. It's the 4 d. No. It's the electromagnetic spectrum are stupid eyeballs, which are limited to a slit sliver can't see. It's all it is. That means it's all around us just like the fucking wireless no one can see. And that's why your young nerds won't talk about it, the intracellular networking. So now we've had 5 years exponentiating the nano and technically 7 years since the cyber physical backbone upgrade. To disconnect the radio frequency because it's not secure by cybersecurity to and from the body for precision AI health care. If we're gonna make a change, said professor Akhildes, you could die. Panacea discussion. That's right. Speaker 3: At the beginning, you had mentioned the network is two way. So if the network communication is two way and we can reprogram the bacteria we are put on inside the body, we can reprogram the bacteria we have put on inside the body. Right. We have a huge risk of, security over there. Speaker 4: This part is the cyber world. Right? So now, of course, that's really very, very important that somebody will send all the wrong information, and it can create a zombie. Right? All the, device inside can malfunction. Right? So it's very, very important that who is transmitting or who is reprogramming. Right? So, of course, it's very important, Speaker 3: security. Somebody, in fact, can, cut the communication with the Internet and like a man in the middle attack and come to the new field communication and reprogram it. And this is a huge attack. Speaker 4: Yes. Exactly. Yeah. Yeah. Of course. Yeah. That's very likely. And that's that's why, you know, it's extremely important that part. I kept saying about security, right, in the cyberspace. So, that that's an open issue. And, hopefully, people will behave nicely, but that's not that's not the case, unfortunately. You're right. So now somebody can come and then really reprogram you and kill you even. Speaker 3: Not only you, maybe the other source. Speaker 4: So now somebody can come and then really reprogram you and kill you even. You know? Speaker 3: Not only you. Maybe the others also. Yeah. Yeah. Speaker 4: I mean, you meaning, like, many people. Yeah. Speaker 3: Yeah. Because I I am the person from the cybersecurity perspective. This is why it came to my interest. Speaker 4: Exactly. Yeah. Yeah. Speaker 2: So you really believe those of you moron class that are sucking cock endlessly like a nipple on a boar? Doctors. Okay? So you believe these same people who set this up by law, FCC? Are gonna actually let their precision AI health care and electric vehicles for them and their friends not be secure enough so they don't die? Speaker 4: So now somebody can come and then really reprogram you and kill you even. You know? Speaker 3: Not only you, maybe the others also. Speaker 2: See, you'll get flocked up left, right, and center, but they're gonna be a okay like Elysium in the sky, Gattaca style. Right.

@Yohmini2 - Yoh Mini

In addition click on post & repost Watch, listen read & find scientific references 👇

@Yohmini2 - Yoh Mini

Click on post & repost 4 all info #TheGreatReset = #Agenda2030 + #17SDGs = #Actionplan #WEF24 to consolidate the #4IR = #BiodigitalConvergence = #Transhumanism which leads to a #PosthumanWorld !!

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses a control grid called the Global Information Grid, which aims to connect every human as a node on the network. This grid is used to control people's movements, thoughts, and behaviors, as well as to manipulate the weather and create diseases. The control grid operates through transhumanism, merging humans with machines using nanotechnology. The speaker emphasizes that people are unaware of being part of this invisible prison and being targeted with invisible weapons. The governments use psychological operations and propaganda to deceive the public. The speaker also mentions the use of satellites, towers, and wireless body area networks to connect individuals to the grid. The speaker urges people to educate themselves, protect their health, and seek a relationship with God.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Let's start at the beginning. The powers that control the world have been endeavoring to find a way to control the world's population. In order to do this, their plan has been to establish a control grid that is run by emerging technologies that covers the entire world and connects every human body as a node on the network of that grid. The control grid they have established is called the Global Information Grid, which is a worldwide network of information transmission and associated processes, which includes all the infrastructure, which is your communications networks, electronics, software and all databases in the world. It is on this same grid that they operate something called the lethal autonomous weapon system, which is a system of weapons that are controlled remotely by people sitting behind computer screens, and sometimes they are even controlled by artificial intelligence. Included in these weapons are drones, killer robots and electronic microwave weapons or directed energy weapons. These weapons are capable of and are in use right now, not only to kill people, but also to control people's movements, influence their thoughts and behaviors, create various diseases in selected areas of society, control politics, control economies and even control the weather and natural disasters. The way they connect every person's body is through transhumanism, which is essentially merging humans with machines. Transhumanism is being carried out right now on an unsuspecting public through various forms of nanotechnology. They have put this technology inside of people's bodies that hooks people up to the control grid. Now humans and their surrounding environments can be tracked, traced, influenced, controlled. This control grid overrides and violates every human right, every law, and every local government and constitution of every country in the world. It is what I believe the Bible refers to as the beast in the end times. If you were the ruling elite and you wanted to control people, you can't just murder them all at once or pack them away in a physical prison building. There would be too much conflict and your plan wouldn't work. So instead, you turn the society into an invisible prison and make it so people don't realize that they're in prison. And at the same time, you benefit from creating the prison by getting rich off of their labor, especially if you control the fiat. So you can create money out of nothing, and then you can create the invisible prison where you control the population remotely. And this is what the control grid is. It's an invisible prison. People are now cattle and all are being tracked and traced and manipulated or murdered with energy weapon technology. And they don't even know that they're in a prison grid. And they don't know that their bodies are hooked up to this grid. And they don't know that the illness, death, and other things that are happening are coming from invisible weapons that are being used on them. The reason why people don't know is because the governments that have been conspiring to do this have been launching massive psychological operations and propaganda campaigns using Tavistock brainwashing methods through controlled media, both mainstream and alternative. This has been going on to deceive the public and divert attention away from the prison that's being built around them and all the technology development that's being done to make the grid operate. This method is a military term called Mosaic Warfare, also known as NetCentric Warfare, and it's being carried out on the population right now. Now let me do my best to describe the layers of this control grid and how it works. We will start from the outer walls of the prison and work our way in. Surrounding the planet, are satellites. Tens of thousands of them have just been launched into space starting in 2015 through 2017. A lot went up in 2017. That was on purpose. These are satellites of all different sizes, and most of them are in low earth orbit. The satellites handle the bandwidth needed to do the surveillance on large populations, and all of this traffic is routed to all the 5 gs towers that were quickly put up at the same time. The satellites can also be connected directly to a person or a cell phone. From here, the geographical areas of the world have been sectioned off into what are called kill boxes. This is a military term that is defined as a three-dimensional target area defined to facilitate the integration of coordinated joint weapons fire. A city or town could be a kill box, or a building could be a killbox inside of a killbox or your home could be a killbox on the control grid. The network then routes from the satellites or towers to your kill box zone through all your local area networks, through your appliances in your house, your cell phone, etcetera. Then it routes into your body through the wireless body area network, which is a network setup made of various forms of nanotech, such as biosensors, that have been put inside of your body without your knowledge or consent. Data is sent from the cloud, which is a decentralized network of computers all around the world through satellites and networks into your body, which includes your mind as your brain and its chemistry and all your behaviors are part of your body. And in return, data is sent from your body through these networks back to the cloud. The worst part of this is not only is all of your physical and mental vital signs surveilled, but this technology can also write commands to your body, to your mind, and to society as a whole. There are codes for specific diseases that can be sent out onto this grid. I believe that there is a specific death algorithm that schedules people targeted for destruction based on various qualifiers set up by those who created this system. Maybe you're about to start collecting your pension, or maybe you wanna have too many kids, or maybe you're a democrat or republican or maybe you're a Jew or a Muslim or Christian. Whatever they don't want in their new society of serfs could be programmed into their kill box directive. Then randomly in the same evening, scattered throughout various locations so it doesn't seem too suspicious, A thousand people get targeted in their beds and die suddenly. Programmed over the course of 2, 3, 4, 5 years, those numbers add up. And those that are left are controlled at the push of a button, while their energy is harvested and used to power the very technology that is their prison. There is an emerging technologies and the medical field so that when you took the injection, you took all the tracking and tracing devices with it in the form of nanotechnology such as biosensors and graphene oxide, amongst many other things that they put in those shots. The nanotech is also activated and controlled through EMF and it uses your body's own electricity to power itself. The network that connects the nanotechnology inside of human bodies to the Internet control grid is called the wireless body area network. And even though you didn't know that you had tech inside of you that was connecting your body to the cloud, the IEEE has written standards for this called 802.15 and a series after that. Your body is naturally electrical. Your heart is electrical. Your brain is electrical. And you have a natural electric field around your body called the biofield. All humans were born with 1. It is the way God made us. Knowledge of this field was taken away from humanity through the Flexner report in 1910. This was the same time and same event where all natural healing methods were replaced with the cut, burn and poison methods of the satanic medical industry created by John Rockefeller, the same medical industry that would be used to control the world through the COVID pandemic and murder our loved ones in the hospital killing fields. So not only did this industry take away your basic knowledge of your natural biofield, but the emerging technology industry has spent decades hijacking humans' biofields with wireless technology, the result of which is sickness, disease and death. The last 4 years of COVID had been a massive project to get everyone tracked and traced in their upgraded system. While this technology has been in development for decades, it wasn't working well enough. They needed to upgrade the system to go from dial up to broadband on the entire network. In 2017, the infrastructure for the upgraded system was laid out, and all the emergent technology was put into place. The satellites went up at this time. The towers went up. And a lot of small nanomaterials known as metamaterials were put into place. No one even noticed in the real world. But in the industry, everyone knew about it. And hundreds of thousands of papers and technology patents were created around this new grid infrastructure. It was called the cyber physical backbone, and it's what they considered to be the launch of the 4th Industrial Revolution. And then once they had their new network infrastructure in place, it was time to test the ability to transmit signals over the network. They needed to increase the signal, so they graphinated the entire population through the COVID injections. The graphene was the load balancing on the new upgraded system. Now their upgrade is complete, and there are all sorts of things that they can do to people and everyone's acting like everything's just fine and we've all gone back to normal. I've heard ridiculous rumors and psyops that say, they're going to turn it off. Are you serious? Do you realize how much time, energy, resources and market share have been invested in this industry? It's a $1,000,000,000,000 industry. There are millions of scientists and engineers all over the world with high paying jobs employed in this industry right now. This is what so many kids are going to college for. It's 2 of the biggest and most corrupt industries merged, big pharma and communications. And you think that they're going to shut it off? What people don't realize is just how much control they have now over the population. They have been doing a lot of very public things to show you what they plan on doing with all that control. There is a Pentagon directive updated in January of 2023, DoD directive 3,009, which means all systems are now go on the autonomous weapon system, which will be used on the public. The president's 2023 budget requests nearly $2,000,000,000 for the National Nanotechnology Initiative, the largest ever request since its inception. You might wanna read that. There's some really interesting stuff in there that they plan on doing with the nanotechnology. An executive order in September of 2022 calls for advancing biotechnology and biomanufacturing innovation. This is what they're calling biodigital convergence. You might want to look into this. It's essentially the extermination of the human race. Real ID is being implemented in America right now. You won't be able to travel without it. Other countries are implementing their own digital IDs. There are 15 minute cities being built right now, and hundreds of established cities have already been turned into smart cities. They've been putting up this technology prison grid everywhere at warp speed. The new street lights use optogenetics to control the biosensors in your body. These cities boast of streets streaming with free Wi Fi for the public. And how exactly is that secure? And all government services centralized in a one stop shop format. No, thank you. The list of things that they can do with technology is endless. Remember, they can not only kill people, but they can issue whatever diseases they wish. They can create pandemics. They can manipulate crowds of people to create movements. Civil wars, mass murder. So how are they getting away with this? Through lying, obfuscating, gaslighting and psyops. Let me explain further and I'll try to make this really clear. They have used technology to create a prison system that has control over our bodies that is hooked up to an electronic warfare system. They lied about what they were doing and they told us all of this was for our health. They are using technology to change our DNA, to control our behaviors, to make us sick or to kill us. Well, some people started finding out that it's the technology that's causing this. They started finding some self assembling computer components in people's blood. Human bodies started emitting Bluetooth codes. The embalmers were pulling strange structures at deceased people's veins and arteries that were composed of electrically conductive materials used to make circuit boards. When you see people dying suddenly and it's caught on camera, this is what it looks like when technology has been put inside of humans and they're beamed with frequencies and it kills them. Then everywhere, doctors, alternative media, talking heads, lawyers, nurses, even whistle blowers, were directly confronted with the evidence of this technology. So many of them claimed ignorance. They said they didn't understand technology or that they're not qualified to speak about technology. Then they picked a random biological detail, something that was very confusing to the public, shrouded in technological aspects of what's happening. They use the wireless technological aspects of what's happening. They use the wireless body area network in all the major hospitals. It's called the medical body area network. Everything is wireless for the most part in a hospital. A doctor or nurse can be sitting in the reception lobby and push a button on an iPad, which then administers a drug to a patient's body down the hallway wirelessly. Your body is constantly scanned, and all the biosensors in your body are being read by these machines through a software called Omnet. All this data is collected and sent to the cloud for further decision making processes. Did you know that they have a COVID wireless body area network database? It was established during COVID to track and trace all the vitals of people's bodies gathered from their biosensors. They use something called Project Salus in order to do this, which is a Pentagon initiative to track and trace all the people on the COVID W band. That's why in some of the 5 gs towers, when you open up the panel, you see they are marked with COVID written on the panel of the 5 g tower. Why else would they do that? At first, it was very frustrating to people like myself and my husband, whose field is technology. We tried to get doctors to talk about the tech and they kept playing dumb. And we thought, well, maybe they just don't know. Well, we found out that they all know because they have to know in order to have those doctor credentials. The medical and technological fields have been merged, like, for 20 years or so. Right? The wireless body area network is how they're accessing biosensors inside of human bodies through a wireless grid. All of these doctors and nurses and emergency service personnel and various law enforcement and other frontline responders were the end users of the iPads that were using the wireless body area network to log into people's bodies and kill them. So they knew. They knew all about the technology. And they lied. And they obfuscated. And therefore, they are complicit. So what can you do? Well, first stop promoting psyops, because that's how they were able to get all this stuff built around us without us even noticing. We were all too busy spinning in the various psyops that they put out there for us to believe in. 2nd, stop believing liars. Call them out on it, especially these professionals from the medical industry. They all know what the wireless body area network is. And if they tell you that they don't, then they are lying. 3rd, fully educate yourself on the truth. Learn about emerging technologies and the $1,000,000,000,000 industry that is transhumanism and the IEEE. And of course, the wireless body area network. You'll have a lot of reading to do and a lot of unbrainwashing to do, but trust me, you'll be much better for it. And finally, you're going to need to go into survival mode. The more you educate yourself, the more you'll learn that there are things that you can do right now to protect yourself and your family. Learn about EMF and what you can do to mitigate it because that's what they're using to control this network. Look at your surroundings with a new understanding of the grid that you are now in and see if there are ways that you can lessen the targeting. Boost your immune system and detox regularly. And what I firmly believe in most of all is to get a close relationship with god because that is the only way that we're going to get through this. And with that said, may god bless you and keep you in these troubling times ahead. Remember to stand on truth, and the truth shall make you free.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The goal is to eradicate humanity by conditioning us for a posthuman future. Through psychological, biological, cultural, and educational manipulation, we are being pushed towards accepting our own extinction. Society is being destabilized, dehumanized, and demoralized to create a weak, ignorant population easily controlled. The attack on masculinity, promotion of androgyny, and transgender movement are all part of this agenda. Gender ideology is a tool to lead us towards transhumanism. However, the truth remains that 2 + 2 equals 4, and no amount of manipulation can change that. The harm being done to children and young people in this process must be stopped.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The final goal is to eradicate humanity as we know it. Once you understand the final destination, it becomes much easier to look back and identify the psychological conditioning, the biological tampering, the cultural grooming, and the educational prepping that we have been subjected to for decades in preparation to making us accept a post human future. It takes a lot of physical and psychological abuse to get an intelligent species like ours to agree to its own extinction. Most, if not all, that has transcended in the last 60 years, was designed to get us closer to accepting such a dystopian reality. Whether you care to accept it or not, we live in a hyper controlled matrix, where our perception of reality is meticulously planned, managed, and executed in order to control and steer us in whichever direction they wish. And the direction is a posthuman world. For this, they first needed to destabilize, dehumanize, and demoralize humanity through every means possible. The destruction of the nuclear family, children being indoctrinated by the state, abortion, the eradication of God and spirituality from education, life in mega cities and away from nature, toxic food, air, and water, social media replacing real human connection and interaction, engineered financial crisis and taxation, endless wars and massive migration, stress, society, depression, drugs, and alcohol, constant fear mongering, moral relativism as the new religion. And I could go on and on about how humanity has been influenced and forced to move away from all the things that give us strength, security, purpose, and meaning. A weak, immoral, disconnected, ignorant, and unhealthy population is an easy target for the next stage. The creation of an entire generation of androgynous beings. Masculinity is under attack, psychologically, culturally, and biologically. Women are being replaced in sports, entertainment, and politics by men pretending to be women, and children are being indoctrinated at school to think that gender is a choice. The transgender movement is not a grassroot movement. It comes from the top. It has nothing to do with people's freedom of expression, sexuality, or civil rights. It's an evil psyop to with a clear agenda to get us closer to transhumanism by making us question the most fundamental notion of human identity, agenda. If you don't know who you are, if you already identify as a hybrid between a man and a woman, you will be easily convinced to become a hybrid between human and machine. Gender ideology is the 2 plus 2 equals 5 from George Orwell's 1984 dystopian novel. It's the final test to see whether we will follow the most absurd party line towards our own extinction. But 2 +2 equals 4. And no matter how you choose to dress, call yourself, or change your physique, we'll not change that. The sad reality though, is that in the gaslighting process to get us closer to a post human future, they have mentally and physically harmed an increasing number of children and young people, and it's only getting worse. This must be stopped.

@Yohmini2 - Yoh Mini

Evidence Biological IDsystem already been deployed, click on post 4 all info 👇

@Yohmini2 - Yoh Mini

#ReeseReport Evidence #BiologicalID system already been deployed 👇 tinyurl.com/SS-RR-BID

Video Transcript AI Summary
Humanity has been infected with surveillance nanotechnology through COVID shots, causing those vaccinated to glow under UV light. Filaments are expelled from the skin, moving on their own and potentially spreading shedding. The genetic code for luciferase and s v 40 in vaccines may be causing the glow. Legislation like the TRACE Act and quantum dot tattoo research suggest monitoring and tracking of vaccinated individuals. This aligns with biblical prophecy of a mark on the right hand or forehead. Despite this, individuals still have free will.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Emotionally, it is easy to dismiss the work of doctor Anna Maria Milchia. For it is very disturbing, but her work is shown through scientific testing and backed up by government and NGO documentation. And the evidence shows that humanity has already been infected with cutting edge surveillance nanotechnology. This is a follow-up to my last report on doctor Neil Chia's hydrogel research. New research shows that those who received the COVID shots emit a fluorescent orange glow in their faces that is visible under a UV light of 365 nanometers, and those who have been exposed to shedding emit this glow around their nose. After his wife was coerced into getting the COVID shot, PhD Justin Coy began his own research. He found that the more shots a person received, the more they glowed under UV light. The glow can be seen initially around the nose and over time spreads throughout the entire face and into the neck. After a hot shower, filaments are expelled through the skin of the vaxxed, and these filaments also emit a glow under UV light. These filaments not only glow, but they have been shown to move on their own in spastic movements, and they are also attracted to people. In videos, they can be seen trying to latch onto a finger. And when a person who has received the shot has dry skin, these expelled filaments will become airborne. This could explain how shedding occurs from the vaxxed to the unvexed. The Pfizer trial document stated that an unvaxxed individual in close proximity to someone who's been vaxxed can be infected by inhalation and skin contact. In 2008, a biological nanotechnology pesticide designed to kill the brown moth in the state of California was deployed and appears to have included the same sort of fluorescent invisible micro dye that we see in the scientific research. Doctor Hildegard Stanninger tested individuals exposed to this nanotech pesticide and found that a glow could be detected in their eyes under UV light. Doctor Staninger called this the eye of Horus effect due to its similar appearance and claimed it was due to the use of fluorescent thiocyanate in the pesticide, which according to the literature, would have been used to track the effectiveness of published in 1997, discusses an invisible infrared dye which is visible under UV light so that rioters can be later identified. Justin Coy points out how the genetic code for luciferase, a bio luminescent enzyme found in nature, is included in the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines along with s v 40, which could to be written into the genetics of the recipient. Koi proposes that this could be what is causing the vaxxed to glow under UV light. The TRACE Act, HR 6666, COVID 19 Testing, Research, and Contacting Everyone Act was introduced in May of 2020. The bill authorizes Centers For Disease Control to contact trace and monitor the population. In late 2020 and early 20 21, people all over the world started noticing purple street lights, which is the color of UV light. The quantum dot tattoo research funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation provided a way of detecting whether or not a person was vaccinated by including fluorescent medical information in the vaccines, invisible near infrared tattoos that would imprint beneath the skin to later be read by customized smartphones. In the scientific literature on quantum dot research, these fluorescent medical information tattoos have a similar appearance to the faces of those infected by the vax under UV light. You may or may not believe in biblical prophecy, but it seems clear that the ones running this diabolical program are using it as their playbook. From Revelation 13, and the second beast required all people small and great, rich and poor, free and slave to receive a mark on their right hand or on their forehead so that no one could buy or sell unless he had the mark. But never forget, we still have free will. Greg Reese reporting.

@Yohmini2 - Yoh Mini

LISTEN & become aware of what is being implemented behind the scenes for decades, click on post 4 all info, incl scientific references 👇

@Yohmini2 - Yoh Mini

#BioDigitalConvergence #Nanotech #4IR #WBAN #Transhumanism See repost & commentsection 4 all info

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker expresses frustration that people are not acknowledging the existence of computer networking through the human body. They discuss the use of biosensors, electromagnetic dominance, and the manipulation of human anatomy. The speaker criticizes those who deny or lie about these technologies and urges others to recognize the truth. They emphasize the importance of understanding the augmentation and control of the human body through electronic warfare and the potential consequences of ignoring these realities. The speaker calls for transparency and accountability in discussing these topics.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I wanna say thank you to my best friend over there, the hillbilly heart on the YouTube, for posting in her team who hall tonight a bunch of extra data, trying to help the basic layperson out there understand that when you ignore things that are legally entered into Pentagon directives, college textbooks, and other legal documents that are required by universities for PhDs, that's gonna catch up to you. And when you decide that you're too stupid, you can't understand, well, that's how we end up with an intelligent cluster based routing protocol and going through the human body. And people are out there right now telling you none of this is real. There's no computer networking through the human body. If there was, someone would have told us. Now watch this. This is the SynergyTechMetric PDF. Now these papers are not just from the MDPI. They're not only from Cambridge. They're not only from your LSV Air journal. They're not only from Wiley. They're from everywhere. And when I type in emergent technology on Wikipedia, I'm told that the blockchain Bitcoin is not here yet. So that means that bitcoin, 3 d printing, nanotechnology is not in use. So for any of you right now that have a bitcoin wallet, you're having a mass hallucination. I'm not joking. I'm not being hyperbolic. This says energy harvesting. Yeah. What kind of energy are they harvesting? Human, Kinetic, intragalvanic, piezoelectric, energy. Now you're gonna tell me, oh, there's just no way. We don't have wireless sensor networks, and I said and showed. We've had biosensors since the 19 fifties. So what we have had to endure for 5 years are psychological operations. And then everyone goes, well, that's their job, and they have to do it. They're killing people. It's called a kill box. They are killing people, and whoever you are, you're letting them. You're not reading. You're not holding yourself accountable to the fact that when you eat your lunch, it doesn't come out your posterior in the same physical fashion because you have an electrical biochemical digestive tract with an electrical biochemical heart and electrical biochemical bloodstream neurotransmitters. No. No. There's no such thing. I've heard they're invading from Mars. So let me get this straight. You can spend tons of hours on the Y Files on the YouTube reading and listening for 40 minutes and then more hours. How about Project Looking Glass? That's radar looking through your ass because you are a node on a computer network. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. For a while now. Yeah. Since 1995. We're not gonna talk about that. No. No. No. We're going to talk about aliens and crap we cannot prove. But when I show up as someone who survived black projects and I'm pissed off, That's all we ever talk about. Every time I hear another creator go out there, even my very best friend, well, she's angry. K. I have a question. Okay. I'm 44. Alright. I, at one point, was a child too. Right? We all were. Okay. And all growing up, I was told the aura does not exist. How many of you out there right now, and do not lie, I said, hey. Do you know that you have an aura? So you're not allowed to talk about it. Even at my best friend's house, her husband gets uncomfortable. He's not the only one. 60 year old dude in a hotel, same Jamestown, Tennessee. Don't talk about that rife machine. Dude's terrified. He's over 60 years old, and he's shaking because I'm making my hair stand on end in front of him. Yeah. You're not allowed to talk about that rife machine. They'll kill you. Oh, you're being hyperbolic. No. I'm trying to get you to fucking admit what you do for work. Excuse me? Yeah. Black projects? What is that? Well, the body's electrical, and you lie about that. Since I've been alive, everybody just says, it's chakras, fractals, shaman. And I'm like, okay. So I grew up that way. I grew up being told by the brightest mathematical minds working directly for Lockheed, Boeing, McDonnell Douglas, mathematical, electrical, engineers, on and on and on. It doesn't exist. Only believe in what you can see. Well, can you read? It says kill box. I know it fucking does since 2005. Then I said, can can we read the college textbook? And the adults in my country went, that's a Harry Potter grimoire. And I'm going, wait a minute. Woah. Time out. Wait. Stop. So you mean to tell me that I help install the Internet and build the fucking thing? Here we are Clustering routing protocol through bodies. And I go and I look and I'm like, okay. So there it is. You don't know about the scaler? And I'm like, you mean the fucking metamaterials? Hang on a minute. I got my signs handy. Yes. I know about the metamaterials. Drew some pictures. I'm like, do you fucking people know about the meta materials? She cusses. She won't do a podcast. I'm disabled. They've been electrically assaulting me as a control for years. Sometimes I can't walk for a day or 2. Been disabled for 20 years. They said you have intracranial, brain swelling. Pseudotumor cerebri, fake brain tumor. Then they got away with drugging me with 3 times the human lethal limit for opiates. It ain't a fucking maybe. The medical records I've shown, like, 10 times. Now I can laugh about it because you people out there right now, you're in serious trouble. This is human anatomy on a button press, and it's mandated by the Federal Communications Commission, not some fucking rando over at MUFON. And so when I stumbled into this because I had been tested on with a button in the pocket of my dad and my ex husband, they were selling the ability to electrocute your family member into submission to other fucking people. 2011. I didn't know that. Oh, I'm selling home stereo. I asked for decibel competitions. Watch this, Sabrina. The g force in the car with all the car stereo. I'll disrupt your heart tissue. You get out and have a heart attack 20 minutes from now. Nobody fucking knows the difference. Go around the curve that says 25 miles an hour at a 112, 120, and then play a certain type of bass that has a direct field of physics, physical material physics. Boom. Boom. Boom. Boom. And now you get out of the car and your heart tissue is dislodged just a little bit right in the back with your fucking neck. You'll be dead within 20 minutes. It's physics. Barometric pressure in the veins and arteries. And everybody went, oh my god. And I went, Speaker 1: woah. Is that a Speaker 0: college textbook? No. No. It's not real. The aliens are coming. And I'm like, I put the fuck up with this lifelong. And you all said there ain't nothing there that you can't see. Here comes the diasan fucking around inside human eyes. Here come the remote viewers. I'm remote viewing, and I'm like, that's the global information grid. They give you coordinates because it's a fucking grid for the kill box, and you all got pissy. I don't get it. You know why you don't get it? Because you don't want to. It's really simple, and you should be furious. No. Not until the COVID. Now at the COVID, now all of a sudden that no doctor, no nurse, no police officer, fucking nobody. Not our military. No. I am so dumb. God, it's a virus. We're just gonna kill everyone again like we do every so often. 1911 Tennessee, we put up a bunch of towers for the wireless. 80% of the community got diabetes instantly. Oh, we're just so dumb. We shit ham sandwiches. The heart is not electrical. The body is not electrical. What the fuck is wrong with you? Only believe in what you can see. Alright. Well, let's read. What is the medical implant communication system? That's when we put RFIDs in humans in the fifties sixties and tracked humans like animals. Now what is the Havana syndrome? Well, the ODNI who's in charge of our our country in the US for all of their spookaloo spy state stuff, they said on ABC News in March 2023, there is no Havana syndrome. There's no targeted individuals. You did a job for the government in something called signals intelligence. No, you didn't. You all had a mass hallucination. Now they've been saying that to our own veterans, Doctors and staff for several years. People are dying. Of what? Well, is your body electrical or not? Everyone in the whole world is gonna say no. It's the fucking aura, stupid. Who cares? It's chakras. It's religious. It's fractals. I don't know. Then over here in information surveillance and reconnaissance, neuromodulation, the Internet of bodies, the Internet of things, we have Magdaling software on apps on phones for telehealth, remote health, neuromodulation. Oh, they're controlling my thoughts. No stupid. They're controlling the cellular voltage of your electrical body. That's your biochemical electrical body. Meaning that I can change how you digest your food. I can drug you wirelessly. No different than when you get an email on your phone. Now not only has this been going on for 28 years, wide open market share if you talk about it with the right terminology. Oh, don't get mad. Whatever you do with everything I'm telling you, you're gonna take your rage on the out on me, the disabled woman who pushed it to the fucking limit for 2 years now, and they still want me to do interviews rather than go interview a professor at Purdue University who's handing out PhDs for the w band for 4 years right now on the YouTube. Oh, fuck that. Let's go interview the disabled woman and fuck with her some more. And not a one of you backed up and went, this is wrong. Why is she the only one out there talking about something that's right there in a college textbook? Cisco defines software defined networking from 11 years ago, 2013. Why? That's pretty bad. It really is. It really is. Then the people that told the truth about your 3 point pulse testing on October 4th 11th last year, I had to draw a Cisco security mapping of the back end of our cable system and demand intellectual accountability. I'm like, hello, network function virtualization. You've changed out your remote physical because the blockchain people lied. They said, oh, we're decentralized. I said, no, you're not. You are able to move around because we're watching your body on the 20 year old National Science Foundation optogenetic networks. We're not testing for your fucking house. You might not be at home. So as I did that, I went looking around. I'm like, where are the electrical engineers? Where are the network engineers? Where are the radio frequency engineers? Mouth sealed shut. Here comes 2 people from Pfizer, and both of them lie about human anatomy. Why? Because I don't think they want people to know the truth about having been fucking around inside your veins and arteries, your blood and tissue, making you sick and not and doing whatever else they wanted to since the nineties with remotes. 30 grand according to Greg Reese with the FBI. You download your loved one's DNA into your phone and you hit buttons. That's it. That's your near field effect. Yeah. Yeah. Oh, but it's only for biohacking. Here comes the young nerds a year and a half ago. I couldn't figure it out. They'll never put a gun on the Boston dogs. And I'm like, they did that with hurricane Michael when they when it wiped out the air force base, Tyndall Air Force Base. Hello? No. They would never. It's all unicorns and rainbows. They love us. Speaker 1: Okay. Speaker 0: Okay. Are you gonna admit that you're routing computer networking data through the human body? No. Karen Kingston will tell us the truth. No. She told you that your own anatomy was evil. She told you that you're evil. You have a demon field. Now the quantum markets tell you there's no biofield. There's a quantum field. Then at Tufts University, if you wanna live forever with doctor Michael Levin in regenerative medicine, they'll tell you it's a morphogenetic field. I am angry because a 150 years ago, this body part was on our United States National Institute of Health and disappeared in 1918, 1910 between or I'll say 1910 and 1922. Gone. Now that body part, human biofield, has always been here throughout history. So where did it go? Chiropractors like doctor Jason Dean, he knows that's a body part. He knows when he makes a change in your veins and arteries by pressure like we do with biophysics. You mean the terahertz millimeter wave that we're using with the kill box? How does it work? And all of these people get up in front of you and say, we have hope. Oh, we're gonna do something with law fair. And I'm like, if you don't tell them about neuromodulation, that it was at 40% guaranteed to companies that own your cDNA body part. And they get to log in to you right now for the 6 g or with the 6 g embedded materials that are already live. And everyone with IARPA and BARDA, we're just lying like we breathe, pretending Doctor. Anna Karen Ting said, look, it's nanotechnology. Karen, we know that. You've had 2 years to tell people, nano.gov. I did. I said, nano lipid particles. Then you lied about the human anatomy that harnesses the biomedical telemetry for the biosensors. Then you call the biosensors that we use for soil and water and everything a bioweapon instead of looking people in the face and saying, that is a lipid nanoparticle. This is a quantum dot. Now how how are you taking all these kinds of measurements for EKG, ECG, EEG out of my body in in c 2, in vivo, place of origin, real time. How? She did not tell anyone that. She screamed patent, quantum dot, and said your body is evil. You have a demon field. This is evil. So I am angry because Karen Kingston lied. She is from Pfizer. She's not this stupid. None of them are, but for a 150 years in our country, we do not talk about the biofield because it's part of electromagnetic dominance of the electromagnetic spectrum for electronic warfare, Lockheed, Boeing. And everyone goes, and humps up underneath the MUFON. Then nobody knows. And we have the 4 circles of hell for wireless tissue engineering. What is that? I got an app on my phone. I have your DNA. I log in to your cells and make an electrical change because you are electrical. Now Karen Kingston damn well knows about those biosensors because they are industrial. Those biosensors are not there by accident. They were put in place in the eighties with quantum computing. They were put in further place for testing on neuron colon neuron and brain to brain interface in LSV or neural journals in 2014. The biosensors that are industrial are so old. They're from 2,005. For any little nerd who could program in Python and or c+ and any construction worker who is installing ZigBee or Bluetooth, BLE, lights for LiFi and BiFi, optogenetics biophotonics. But you're still telling people it's aliens. That is disgusting. There is no excuse. And all of you out there go, oh, we can't all be that smart. This is really easy. The emperor has no biofield. They stole a piece of human anatomy. And because you won't admit it's human anatomy, that's why we're in this position. And that's why I'm the only one pissed off going, you're letting them do this because you're allowing them to lie to you all the time. Those are sensor hunters. They have jobs. They go into their stiff, and they hunt your DNA. Tell me how. It's called biomedical telemetry. It's the same exact FCC mandated system that handles the medical apps. And all of you are, oh, I got my Fitbit. Oh, I'm my in persona. Oh, I've got my haptic ear for my video games. And I'm sitting here going, excuse me, they're electituting people from the inside out. They've been at it for since the sixties. Nice and quiet. I think it's a fucking problem because at IITSEC, you've got humans that are augmented. They radiated that biofield. They're not human fully anymore. They're synthetic in different areas of their body. Can we talk about that? No. Well, you produce the cyber physical backbone by graphonating at the whole population 5 years ago. We're still lying. Here comes Karen Kingston again, and she cannot go. That is a human body part. This is how we log into it with Pfizer. I read all the patents. I sat at the table, and I read thousands of pages. Well, clearly, you didn't because you can't read 5 pages without falling into Body Sensor Networks 2 1,005. Speaker 1: Watch. I will show you. Speaker 0: Because for me, this is as simple as these are jobs. And I've shown that repeatedly, and we don't wanna deal with that. Because then we would have to admit to things like routing open shortest path first through molecular networks of human DNA. We would have to admit to storing data on human DNA only only for the spy state. You don't even know, and it's gonna suck the electricity out of you. You're tired. You have an autoimmune disorder. You have no idea why, and they're never gonna tell you. Because you cannot disrupt the electrical homeostasis of humans at every cellular level and then sit there and go, oh, I have no fucking idea. Why are they sick? Why are they falling down? Sudden adult death syndrome, I'm so stupid. I have no clue. Let me show you how bad it is. So we got our kill box. That is your house. Measurements and metrics. Okay? Now you're gonna ask me, well, how do they do it? They sit down with a little headset that looks right through your veins and arteries with sensors, open systems, architecture, jobs. In their little headset, they can send a signal to your body, and you're gonna tell me, no. And I'm gonna say, I'm really sorry that people have lied to you about your own anatomy, your own blood and tissue, and the fact that this is well known. 28 year old technology is not new. Everything you see in these boxes, 1995. Medical body area networks for all your terahertz, wands, and health apps, 2014. Optogenetics, check out the WEF stage 3 years ago. What are you doing right now? Building c 40 cities. How do those work? Let me show you. Cognitive body area networks with 1, 2, 3, technically 4, tiers of cybersecurity in your body. For your blockchain, your HIPAA records, you're carrying it on you because we shut off the radio frequency. We're using human body communication, intragalvanic electricity of just your tissue, the kinetics of you walking around, and the sound of your heartbeat to make the nano move itself around extracting minerals from your red blood cells whenever it needs to. And you're still out there telling people it doesn't exist. This isn't already done. Agenda 2030 is not done while you're building c 40, which is the upgrade to agenda 2030. This is the SynergyTech metric pdf. Check out what didn't change, Graphene Healthcare and how we physically route it with computer networking right through you, period. Jobs. No, Sabrina. No. No, Sabrina. No. We're not gonna tell them about the electrical engineers wirelessly logging into bodies mandated by the FCC and FDA since 2013. Nope. We're gonna lie like we breathe and scare the fuck out of them, and we're gonna get away with it because we'll just call you crazy some more. And nobody wants to tell the truth about these human remotes. And why would that be? Human augmentation. You lied about that too. So I come out here and I'm like, yo, you need to tell humans that they can generate their own stem cells. You need to tell humans that you stole 80% of their immune system, connected it to the cloud. This is Rutgers University, PhDs for the w band. Where's everybody else? Listening to the sub stack frauds who keep lying to people as we're oh, so afraid you should be. When we lie about what we do when we go to work at the kitchen table, you're lying to your own family. Then you're sending your children to go do these jobs while telling them the cow's farting and growing rice is what's killing the planet. We have full weather control admitted to in the Library of Congress today. So for every single one of you that's still sitting there fucked up going, I just don't understand why this woman is so pissed off because you're treating my fellow citizenry like they do not deserve to learn or know their own anatomy. And I find it abhorrent, disgusting. I find it an abomination. I don't care what your religion is or isn't. To lie to other humans when you fucking know that's a body part. You're just logging in and fucking around, and then you go tell your relatives, I'm a biomedical engineer. I'm a nurse. I'm a doctor. Well, that's great. What are you doing? 5 years. Families destroyed, all this stuff. Oh, Sabrina, there's nothing we can do. Then why is doctor Jason Dean out there telling people we have hope? Why is Tory out there given our supreme court has ignored Todd Callender telling people let's sign an amicus brief to our supreme court to handle international law on electromagnetic systems that have no fucking oversight direct out of our country. She's a former crypto linguist with the NSA. She knows better. Well, what are we gonna do? We don't have a vote. No. You don't. We have neuromodulation. I've got a radar cube, says Elon. What is that? That's you logging into human bodies with human radar. You didn't tell people that. You didn't tell him the Starlink is phased array bounced in the signal with routing protocols specially addressed for the w band for several years now. Thermal dynamic swelling, the whole nine. You didn't tell them that. You told them nothing but fear. Why? Since 2012, I put on my little EEG headset, and I've started looking right through you and making changes. You are now in a database on a 6 g cognitive body area network. And the reason that I know that this is going through is not only because of test beds, it's because this is how in Myanmar they flew a drone over your home for the COV w band, which you all still lie about that too. And until you're willing to admit to people what you got paid to do when you went to school and switched out regular biology way back in 2008, and it's split now. Regular biology and synthetic biology, fuck tons of jobs before morphogenetics, life extension. Who doesn't want antiaging? Come on now. Now we have skin tronics, bioelectronics, electroceuticals, designer drugs, and AI precision health care. What did you tell people? Get ready for the aliens. You told them the 6 g does not exist, and a gentleman dropped a comment and said the 5 g is not scalar. That's correct. The metamaterials are. And all the 6 g is is that 6 g low personal area network. The LoRa. Gigahertz to terahertz, terahertz to gigahertz. And for Owen Benjamin, that's the millimeter wave terahertz bullets on the side of your house controlled by AI, which is why your ass finally fucking talked and said, well, a millimeter wave is kinda dangerous. Thanks, Caltech. You wanna tell him the truth now? You're the liar with the near field effect. Oh, she's crazy. Stay away from her. The DOD didn't leave anybody out, mister Benjamin. You're helping Cointel. Then you went on info wars, etcetera, etcetera, and it made sense to me. When I watch these mathematicians when I was younger, Carrie versus Flynn, we're still gonna keep the remotes, keep it all under control. What are we watching right now? Exactly that. Oh, it's a movie. We're gonna do something for themselves. Listen. You guys can talk a big game. You can drive narratives on your gambit satellites. I hear it come and go, and I'm like, you're still lying. I know you're lying because these are engineered systems. I'm not coming from, oh, you're fucked up. I'm MQ Ultra. I wrote a book. Do you see me sitting here in front of you showing you Ian, professor Akhildiz? This signage right here is from professor Akhildiz in his metamaterials presentation, not something that I channeled and went, oh my god. I'm so much smarter than everyone else. Nope. I went directly to the source of who is the human providing the material to Tufts University, Rutgers University, Cambridge, Oxford. Of course, our lovely MATLAB over with MIT, the IAS. That'd be the Advanced Institute, Princeton. Hello? No. She must be crazy. Nope. Metamaterials are part of the 6 g because the bio electromagnetic algorithms had too much radio frequency leakage, and there was too much cybersecurity mitigation network openings, you know, where we don't want other people to be between the human themselves and the extra radio frequency around their body creating too much space. So now we use human body communication with the metamaterials and just hit you right in the fucking face with the smart dust. And how did I figure it out? I held a job with my coffee stained resume every fucking time going, when I found your 60 low personal area network, machine to machine, ad hoc, vehicular, on the fly routing, and the bodies were in the middle of this. I'm like, woah. Why are bodies here? Well, they've been here for a while. Then I went back to, in September of 2020, the artificial intelligence symposium at the Department of Defense, and I took notes. And they said m q nine reaper tethered the ground to your DNA project Maven. And I'm like, the fuck is that? So when I went ahead and researched Geomancer and Spellcaster per Celeste Salom. I found, we're gonna find you. We're gonna update your databases. Those are those artificial intelligence notes where our own DOD was selling database curation to companies. Well, welcome to your Internet of behaviors. Oh, we're so dumb. No. Amazing Polly told the whole truth in 2021. Here's Red Rwanda in the nineties. Get on your knees. We'll hit a button. You're in your little circle here. Morse circle math. We electrocute your body. Now your brain and your body are all fucked up. You surrender to the next person you see wearing a blue coat, for example. Oh, it's math because you are an antenna in an electrical body. You fucking lied to everyone about electronic warfare. Then you lied about the BLE and sent out the black pill shield to pretend he was too stupid to know that the BLE had been mandated since the same 2,005 and had everyone swimming around confused. What is a MAC ID? What does it do? Why is it inside the body? And that infuriated me because I'm like, I know as a radio frequency dude, you fucking know better. Nope. We're gonna lie about it. Okay? So the reason that radio frequency people and all these people are lying to you is because information surveillance and reconnaissance, our c four ISR, which is what contains our slaughter bots, drone swarms, drones in general, they don't want anybody to know about Pentagon directive 3,009. So the code ban, IOTW ban, Google Fingers, you're gonna find out that they have you on different networks determining how sick you are and how infected you are. And the reason for that is because you have lied about human anatomy. Your biofield comprises 80% of your immune system when you take mean, median, and mode of the different organs involved with the immune system. Project Stellus is sentient AI from Dartmouth since 1954. I had cassette tapes from my parents talking about project Stellus in 1969, which I found or 1972, excuse me, which I found really weird until I went ahead and did further research. I worked at the University of Wisconsin Whitewater as professional information and technical services. And I found the software that Fauci was talking about with the HIV a long time ago. They wanted AIDS, take the AZT to destabilize the immune system, low earth orbit satellite right into the biofield. And I'm like, what are these old underground IBMs? Well, check out the Daily Mail. There's one from 18/60 on. Lie some more. It'll be great. I'll get to sit here and go, so tell me, why is it that nobody knows anything? Because it's information, surveillance, and reconnaissance. That means we don't want people to know about that stuff so that they can't come back and spy on us. Right? Okay. Great. But when you don't tell your own country what you're doing, what's project Maven? Well, project Maven is in use with our Department of Defense and everyone's body for electronic integrated disease surveillance system, which is what your COV W band is. And your cognitive threat warfare technology is that little headset watching your body with EEG, MRI. It's all left the hospital, and the ultrasound has also left the hospital. And anything that you see here, your ISP satellite, drones, infrared, wireless sensor networks, brain to brain, wireless sensor networks that are ad hoc, meaning go up and down, physical mac connections, regular mac ids, personal area network, bootstrap devices, your man net, all of that hits right into your body because you are a node on the network per the international standards for electrical and electronics engineers. Now if I've got an electronic integrated disease surveillance system with the CDC since 1988, and I have apps with BioLabs called Bioconductor for Bioinformatics that already have sold Marburg and Ebola testing a year and a half ago, ready to go. PCR testing. Right? Nope. Scorpius and Zeus were sold to the DOE, the Department of Energy, and the IRS and the DHS. What the fuck is that for? Right. So we have little phones so we can point at you, give you diseases, take them away. Nobody's talking about it, that it's been there since 2012 for what it is and who's doing it. Your medical, your sheriff, your police, your logistics, your law fair, your main military, paramilitary. Why? Because this is electronic warfare with advanced signals technology. C 4 ISR, the army, multi domain sensing system with high accuracy detection, exploitation, biosensors, industrially in the body since 2005. Your body is 802.15.6. You are a node on the network, period. No, Tori. That our supreme court ain't gonna give a fuck, and I really wish you would tell people that. Why? Tell them, Tory. Tell them why. Because the satellites are not where the problem is. Right, lady with the radar cube, the fly intercept? Their body is the network. With the molecular communication nanoterahertz routing with pathlets. Those little fragments of DNA, they're routing them in and out of people, And I'll post that link when I'm done posting this. Those of you out there that are stalling, those of you out there that are still collecting money to lie about this and protect the sensor hunters. You're getting people killed. Those of you that are waiting around for the same people who did all this to turn it off, your body is the network. The only way to turn it Speaker 1: off is to turn off Speaker 0: your DNA. Computer networking through the human body with bio electromagnetic algorithms and metamaterials has consequences. When you lie to people for 5 years after putting in the cyber physical backbone in 2017, you're still scaring people. What are you gonna tell them now? Because you sure as hell are not gonna turn it off. We have a bunch of people that are already augmented in black swan IITSEC ready to go. So what are you really gonna do? You're gonna kill people, and they're all gonna get away with it because nobody wanted to talk about anything real. Everyone wanted to be incensed with UFO stories and all this garbage that goes all the way back to hiding the information, I'm looking for a sign, surveillance and reconnaissance tech for signals, advanced signals technology, which is a sign I'm looking for. So sensors open system architecture and modified open system approach, and the one that's missing is the optogenetic one right here, OSSA. We've had this around with high accuracy detection exploitation systems since the fifties. The international community in on Computer Weekly in 2014 wanted to sue the project Maven problem away, and they were told internationally by the Pentagon and DARPA, BARDA, and IARPA, no. So the reason they were told no is because of your Steve Greer, all this secrecy around the UFO crap that is really, truly us fucking around with the electrical human body part, making sure that no one else is allowed to talk about it for what it is. And that way, they can continue with their life extension, screwing around, logging in and out of bodies. Nobody wants to deal with it. Nobody wants to believe it. All of my religion will protect me, my belief system. Meanwhile, the biohackers and biophysics people are like, let them do what they want. We'll just electrocute you into submission. I like they've been doing the entire time and since the fifties with full dominance of the electromagnetic spectrum. That's how we also have our CRISPR Cas 9 logging in and making changes. Not a problem. Nanobarcoding, modified polynucleotides. And I've and I'm watching people go out there and tiptoe around it, and then here comes Karen Kingston. Oh, look. Nanotechnology. Yeah, Karen. We know. Nano.gov, 20 years. There's a biomedical telemetry involved with your health apps. There's a biomedical telemetry involved with the Department of Defense HDIAC casualty care. There's a biomedical telemetry involved with our health. And if you don't tell humans full on, flat straight out, we are logging into people's bodies with apps on the fucking phone. They have no idea when they walk through the grocery store. What the hell are you doing? Tracking you, sending your data to somebody? We've been dealing with that for 3 to 4 years. Oh, they're gonna do something about it more than 3 to 4 years. They can't. That's why, Tori, sending people to the Supreme Court is a waste of their time, and you know it. Instead, I will I really wish you would send people into this direction. Can you please start admitting that you route computer networking through the human body? Can you please get people up to speed on the augmentation that's already been done? Spending time whining at the Supreme Court and endless lawfare they're not interested in, we have very little time left before everybody's cubes are going to pop, snap, up, down, and transversal current in the global information grid. And I haven't heard about any of that out of you, dear. I've only heard you talk about things that are over here in technical. Why aren't you talking about what happens with the gradient waves? Or do you not know? I'm serious. The way that we handle pushing that craton out of the way, lower California like a step stair step stair, buoys in the optogenetic networks for combinatoric math, and that's what those radar cubes are for per the DOD Pentagon statements in chemical warfare some more and DARPA r and d for 2023. Yeah. I kinda held back because I've been waiting for the rest of you to say something. Make the same mistake like I did in April of 2022. Hey. You wanna tell people what you're really gonna do to them? No. We play games with each other in our sandbox here in the spy state. That's great. This is the synergy channel. I don't play with the spook a woos. So they use video game controllers to control people like Sims. Yeah. They gave the guys in the white vans jobs and a pension. Signature reduction force jobs. Google that. There's your finder's cult. They were employed. They have been hired since then. Why do we need a signature reduction force? Because we're neurally modulating people and getting paid for it. And they're going to their conferences and fucking around and selling access to other people in their lives every day. That's why no one can get off the databases as well. So when you call me hyperbolic, they root around in real time in your veins and arteries. Your body area network is the weapon. No tower or nano required. Just you and your own internal galvanic coupling and electricity. That's how it works. So the truth is not hard. It's ugly. They stole a body part, and you won't talk about it for what it is. We have hacked the bioelectric code. We have hacked the Schumann. We have changed out the golden ratio. We have installed biosensors into human bodies since 2005 as somebody's job. You're all still sitting there pretending it's the Illuminati and the aliens are coming. Disgusting. Immature. No reason to do that. Oh, Trump's gonna come in and do what? Listen, I wanna hear this follow through to its logical conclusion. So far, what I'm seeing out there since I've been gone is the same bullshitting with Hopium. You gotta tell people that it is their body part. You have to admit that project Maven is Mosaic Warfare and net Centric Node Access. Anything the Internet can get a hold of with the wireless, and that doesn't mean your phone. Anything that the Internet can get a hold of. Anything. And they got you since 2005. With an electronic integrated disease control system since 1988 and you still play stupid. Let me guess. CRISPR is fake too. There is no CRISPR Cas 9. There's no way to DNA encoded solid phase synthesis with combinatoric math and combinatorial synthesis database libraries using our phase array friends to go ahead and change out that electrical signal with nanotheranostics nano cubesat and the new therapeutics we have for wireless health care. You're not you're playing with your brain. They they already did this. They already got away with it all because there's Pentagon directives involved that do not have a positive outcome as a design criterion, only unintended engagement and loss of control since 2012. And you lied about that. So when the cyber physical backbone goes off 5 years later, you're you now do not have a choice. You have human body communication. That means there's your body. You're a node on the network, ultra wideband, no more GPS. We're inside of you with the remote PHY. Your blockchain is handling your HIPAA as well as anything else we want to write into your DNA. Tell me how. Because I got news for you. You think that the 6 g is bad. They've got 7, 8, 9, and 10 already deployed in certain places with universities, and we can't even get people like Karen Kingston to admit that this exists. She keeps telling people that it's some other field, that it's something else rather than we've had you on the cloud since 1995, and we're using human body communication, not radio frequency. And the biosensors are not a bioweapon. They are surveillance biomimetics. And then she could be more helpful, given everyone's watching her and crying for her all the time, if she said these metamaterials by professor Achilles are your 6 g and that the reason they did metamaterials is because the bio electromagnetic algorithms to control human anatomy weren't strong enough. When you send those electromagnetic signals to the wireless, it propagates differently. We needed smaller networks at the terahertz level to autocorrect with the Doppler by phase states. That's why the Doppler went from sped spread spectrum to pulse so that we could be more precise with our electrical acuity. Now tell me how. You have an electrical body part. Every human does. They get to lie about it, make fun of you, and electrocute you from the inside out without your consent, without your knowledge, and without your permission. If you go to the doctor, he'll tell you you're nuts. If you try to get help legally, they will lie to you, take your money, it will go nowhere. There's no one database because they've sold the databases out to all sorts of fucking people. And it's farmed out based on cybersecurity, not a maybe, and not only who can buy what dongle. And that's all controlled by AEHF Delta Space Force. And how do I know all that? Mommy and daddy were at the highest level of international security for satellites back in the sixties seventies. BAE Systems in 2021 sold off their 500 corporation and took on a core 60,000 additional employees. And me, having family records, I went, well, now you've just dropped all your security. And the company that BAE Systems subsumed had been doing topology research worldwide, every country, all topology, no hidden military, no hidden nothing. I found that kinda weird. Then in 2022, in February, the IP addresses, 24 dot something. I had to subnet those in binary for Charter because we had so few IP addresses back in the day, and they were selling in Florida for 3 months, the same IP blocks, satellite. And I'm like, why would you even be doing that? Shriever, you wanna talk about that? Probably not. So having built the ass end of the Internet on CONUS I'm looking at this going you're going from RF to optogenetics. Bodies. You must have another network already built because the network security, you don't just go, hey. We're gonna upgrade. Let's see what happens. No. $300 a minute when it was down at Charter. You don't get to be down. You parallel built. So there's the optogenetic network with the National Science Foundation and nano.gov for 20 years. I'm going, son of a bitch, Li Fi, Bi Fi, and all these bodies and a fuck ton of augmented people. Silicon Valley military, paramilitary, they're everywhere. And I can't even get people to admit that this is an an extent at all in the following way.

@Yohmini2 - Yoh Mini

@Yohmini2 - Yoh Mini

#Patented by #vaccination Supreme Court Petition explaining RNA, mRNA, DNA, isolated DNA and cDNA 👇 tinyurl.com/NV420-PH-SCDE Pdffile 👇 https://tinyurl.com/patentedhuman

Video Transcript AI Summary
En 2013, la corte de Estados Unidos dictaminó que el ADN humano no puede ser patentado, pero si está genéticamente modificado, sí. Las personas vacunadas con adenovirus tendrán su genoma patentado. Esto plantea problemas éticos y legales, ya que los modificados genéticamente podrían perder sus derechos humanos. Es crucial alertar a la población sobre las implicaciones de esto y luchar contra la aprobación de tales prácticas. Es hora de ser soldados y proteger a nuestra sociedad de estos peligros.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Ustedes saben que en el dos mil trece Estados Unidos, la corte de Estados Unidos se expidió diciendo que el ADN humano, el genoma humano, no se puede patentar porque es producto de la naturaleza, pero si está alterado genéticamente se patenta. Cuando ustedes con una vacuna con adenovirus modifican el genoma, esa persona propiedad del dueño de la patente. Pero lo más dramático de todo es que por ser transhumana no será considerada humana con los derechos humanos que conocemos. Todavía no tuve tiempo de hablar con conocemos. Todavía no tuve tiempo de hablar con ustedes, pero es gravísima la situación y me da la sensación de que aún nuestra gente, como nos pasó recientemente, no se da cuenta de la gravedad que estamos enfrentando. No es solo la enfermedad que va a producir mortal muchas veces sino que los sobrevivientes tendrán el genoma modificado y que esa modificación pasará a su descendencia. No sé si y que no sé si y que por ser modificado su genoma está patentada esa modificación. Y todo lo que está patentado pertenece al que patentó. No sé si alcanzar a entender lo que les digo. Y eso tiene que hacer que ustedes hoy, hoy salgan de acá con toda la fuerza para recurrir a todos los medios para alertar a la población, porque es la última posibilidad que tenemos, donde, como dijo María José, pasen este paso y le den, Tienen dinero suficiente para lograr, por malas artes que se haga, dar la aprobación definitiva, estamos perdidos. Hoy ustedes tienen que ser soldados. Tenemos que ser soldados. Tenemos que alertar a la población. No sé si me entendieron, no me voy a extender científicamente la síntesis, y yo he visto las muertes, y yo he visto las causas de muerte. Pero no es eso lo más grave.

@Yohmini2 - Yoh Mini

Click on post 4 downloadlink 👇

@Yohmini2 - Yoh Mini

Whistleblower #BioDigitalConvergence COVID-19/7700 PDF contains 1186 pages! 🟡 Recommended - chapter 10 - chapter 12 The study is subject to constant updates and additions & The  links are permanent, the content changes. 👇 🎯 https://drive.proton.me/urls/11TT50C4ZG#MddrJhq1lTHh 🎯 https://www.calameo.com/accounts/7564957 🎯 https://t.me/+twZo9K1L0Zw4NGFk

Proton Drive Securely store, share, and access your important files and photos. Anytime, anywhere. drive.proton.me
Calaméo - Whistleblower Publications from Whistleblower on Calaméo. Leading publishing platform for digital magazines, interactive publications and online catalogs. calameo.com
Join group chat on Telegram t.me

@Yohmini2 - Yoh Mini

Click on post 4 all info 👇

@remotelyrising - Heather Carr

How did they get our body on the cloud? March 23, 2024 https://www.embs.org/tbme/articles/channel-characterization-of-magnetic-human-body-communication/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Body_area_network https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/senate-bill/5002 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EcmR1Maf2ZU wban | omnet++ projects https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/wcm.884 https://spectrum.ieee.org/fcc-gives-medical-body-area-networks-clean-bill-of-health https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389128623001639#fig1 electromagnetic warfare https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9545052 https://www.nature.com/articles/s41746-022-00610-z https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4654789/ https://www.ieee802.org/15/ https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Analysis-of-the-IEEE-802.15.4a-ultra-wideband-layer-Alberts/70a347d93960f103cbd59c9646a8c3f5b20865c6/figure/2 https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/21/12/4079 https://www.cdc.gov/globalhealth/healthprotection/idsr/index.html https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fchem.2019.00399/full https://spectrum.ieee.org/turning-the-body-into-a-wire https://ieee-cas.org/event/conference/2023-ieee-biomedical-circuits-and-systems-conference https://biosignals.scitevents.org/?y=2023 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/aelm.202200877 https://www.nature.com/articles/s41746-022-00610-z magnetic human body communication ty psinergist! Mark 5:36 amen https://odysee.com/@psinergy:f/trim.7146B228-2E80-4E8A-A6A8-45101DEAACBE:5 #Psinergy #Biofield #WBAN #SabrinaSays

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses how the human body is connected to the cloud through electromagnetic warfare. They explain that the electromagnetic spectrum is used for surveillance and communication, including within the human body. They highlight the existence of the biofield, an electrical and magnetic field emitted by the body, which has been exploited for 60 years. The speaker criticizes the lack of awareness and understanding around this topic, emphasizing the importance of recognizing the body's electrical nature. They also mention the use of wireless body area networks for medical monitoring and the potential risks of hacking and manipulation.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm working on a couple different things right now, but I just had a comment pop up. How did our biofield get attached Speaker 1: to the cloud? Speaker 0: Information, surveillance, and reconnaissance. So it's called electromagnetic warfare. See here? Electromagnetic warfare is warfare involving use of the electromagnetic spectrum. A more precise definition is a military or intelligence operation that uses all or parts of the electromagnetic spectrum, radio waves, microwaves, millimeter waves, infrared, visible light, ultraviolet light, x rays, gamma rays to detect actions or communications and protect against enemy activities. And you will say to me, well, that's wonderful. Right? That's your Boeing and Raytheon and Lockheed and BAE Systems and all these people who are out there with tanks and planes. And I said, yeah, and bodies. And people said, oh, no. No. No. No. We don't look through bodies. That's MK Ultra. And I'm like, what are you talking about? Well, there's masons and hand signals and religions. I'm like, this is electromagnetic warfare, and they've had it for 60 years. And they exploit the electromagnetic spectrum. Did you know that your body is electrical? Did anybody ever bother to tell you what your aura actually magnetism. Like, you know, in the magnetism. Like, you know, in the wintertime when you shuffle across the floor and static electricity builds up and you some more. Right? Yeah. That's electroquasi static communication now with your human body because I'm guessing no one bothered to explain to anybody that your, biofield here is a body part. And that's because of what I just brought up, your electromagnetic warfare. How much of the electromagnetic spectrum can we see with our eyeballs? This little slit right here. We don't see microwaves in the air. We don't see x rays in the air. We don't see our FM and radio waves in the air and we don't see the emails and the text messages come and go on the wireless that we use with our phones. So because of that, this is the electromagnetic spectrum and we have electromagnetic warfare for 60 years in which I'm just assuming most people thought was tanks and planes. They they just figured that they would never go into a human body to protect the body of the guys that are out there helping the tanks and planes? Nope. And even if they did, it would only be for the military. K? So what I've had to do is bring people back to their common sense over and over again. Okay? And when you read, how does electromagnetic warfare work? Radio waves, microwaves, millimeter waves, infrared. Okay. To detect actions and communication. Right? Okay. Check this out. The taxonomy of interbody communication technologies for the Internet of Medical Things, your medical body area network, that was instituted by our Federal Communications Commission back in 2012 to fill your body full of biological sensors that can pull everything, p o l l, everything that you see here. Tell me how. Are you standing in your house right now with electrodes on your head, an oxygen meter on your finger, and a heart rate monitor stuck to your chest? No. Electronic health monitoring took a big step forward last week in 2012 when the Federal Communications Commission approved electromagnetic spectrum for medical body area networks. A medical body area network is a network of inexpensive disposable sensors worn on or even implanted in the body. The sensors monitor various vital signs such as temperature, blood pressure or glucose and transmit the information to a device. Why? Well the network can potentially alert doctors to problems before the patient's condition becomes critical. The lack of multiple wires makes it easier for hospital staff to move the patient and move around. Hospital personnel or home caregivers can quickly add or remove those sensors as medical conditions warrant. So why do you know absolutely nothing about it? It's your body. It's your biological electrical field. And I'm sure lifelong you've been told the aura is fake. Yeah. And that's because your bio field here is all fake. It's not real. It's religious. So now we have biofield definitions on the National Institute of Health right here, the healing and science of it, its history. We also have this one, which I just noticed is going higher on the list, biofield science and healing. And this one talks a little bit more about the emerging technology component of it. However, I prefer the Science Healing and History one because right there keywords bioelectromagnetics. Electromagnetic fields. K? So how did your body end up getting attached to the cloud? Well, that's easy. 60 years of electronic warfare in which you are not told what they were doing with your bioelectricity. And they know what bioelectricity is because the body is electrical. So instead of telling anybody anything, they went to work on body area networks. And if you asked about it, they told you to call your shaman. It's a near field effect. Or they told you nothing except you're crazy take drugs. Since 1995. The rapid growth in physiological sensors, low power integrated circuits and wireless communication has enabled a new generation of wireless sensor networks. And there's your body in your body area network since 1995. So how did we get here? Where gosh. That looks like her Lian Photography. Yeah. Because your body is magnetic and electrical. Oh, but they don't know. Yeah. These are jobs. So how did your body get attached to the cloud in 1995? Your IEEE, your international standards for electrical and electronics engineers who are now your new life sciences doctors with magnetic and magneto quasi static fields in human body communication. And that is what it's called, human body communication rather than the old radio frequency. Why? Because the radio frequency created a big bubble of energy around your body. They've been playing at this since 1995. Things have changed. Things have upgraded. They started the upgrades in 2012, and nobody said anything. They just went to work. And then people lied and said that they had no idea about any of it. Meanwhile, Congress passed the Digi Twin, digital twin, FDA Modernization Act so they could check your digital twin instead of having to test drugs on animals or you. And people went, well, that's kinda good. Right? Well, it would be except the the person who asked the question said, how did they get us on the cloud? Because your body is electrical and they decided to tell you that that body part didn't exist and they kept it for themselves. And now we have such a huge mental disconnect because they call it the quantum field. They call it the, morphogenetic field. And, they never once turned around and explained that they're actually in the body with electromagnetic tinkering. They didn't explain where that human body part went. They just told you it didn't exist while they went to work with it. So that's how it happened. And, in cybersecurity, that's what I'm trying to make sure you understand. To close-up as briefly as possible, your radio wave, microwave, millimeter wave, infrared and visible light, well that's now your new industrial internet and medical things. And that's why your Congress is so confident. 60 years of dominating the electromagnetic spectrum that you can't see with your eyeballs. So you decided that you would only believe in what you could physically see. Right? Because that's so intelligent. I mean, if I can't see it, I don't believe in it. Right? Right? How much of the electromagnetic spectrum that they're dominating can you see? A sliver. So you mean to tell me then using that same logic, you don't believe in your microwave, your radio, your x rays or your cell phone. Seems pretty stupid, doesn't it? Yeah. It does. The emperor has no biofield. But they do. This is 8 years ago with modeling software that they use to pull those same biosensors, heart temperature, etc. The same electrical signals can be pulled with a drone over your home. So not telling people about this is pretty bad in my opinion, but apparently a bunch of other people feel like that's their job and they're right given that they've been allowed and encouraged to lie about this information surveillance and reconnaissance system in which you have young people going to work all the time in biomedical engineering, electrical engineering. They know all about it. They're gonna tell you that they don't have to for 60 years. This is the big old secret. Using your own body's electricity against you. And then when you would ask, this is a near field effect, unified field theory. What field are you near? The human biofield that's on the National Institute of Health with bioelectromagnetics? Then you'll tell me it doesn't exist at all. Watch. Biofield by itself. You go to the Wikipedia. K? Fake, fake, fake. Energy medicine, blah blah blah, fake. What is bioelectromagnetics? The scud b of the interaction between electromagnetic fields and biological entities. So then would you please explain to me how it is that you still don't understand that 60 years of dominating the same electromagnetic spectrum that you can't see, but it's there, is now in use intravody, meaning inside your body. The Internet of medical things paradigm will enable next gen health care by enhancing human abilities, supporting continuous body monitoring, and restoring lost physiological functions. How? What does it say? Ultrasonic waves, electromagnetic waves, magnetic field, electric field, electric current. Is that not the exact same thing that it says right there? Let me give you another one. Taxonomy of interbody communication technologies, microwave, millimeter wave, terahertz, optical, ultrasound for mechanical, low frequency inductive capacitive, and galvanic coupling? Is that not the same thing that it says microwave, millimeter wave, infrared? How does electromagnetic warfare work? Radio waves, microwaves, millimeter waves, infrared. How does the taxonomy of the interbody communication technologies work? Microwave, millimeter wave, terahertz, optical. See how that works? Hence, other technologies have been explored as profitable alternatives for interbody communication including ultrasounds and electromagnetic based methods. Because classical radio frequency is not cyber secured. So then I had to take people here. Is the human body on that same 60 years exploited electromagnetic spectrum? Yep. All bodies emit electromagnetic radiation, and then they measure it. Most of radiation is in the infrared at the wavelength of 12 microns. One of the images I like to use is this one so you can see what goes through your body that were your radio waves and the other ones that get caught up in your tissues. I also like to show people this because when they say I don't believe in the aura, well you're kind of retarded. I'm sorry, but you are. Because I guarantee you if I ask you if you believe in x rays, you are just fine. Tell me how. So how did your body end up on the cloud? Cybersecurity for the wireless body area network. That's been around Speaker 1: a while. Speaker 0: Wireless communication and mobile computing for network security and digital forensics and next gen communications, 2011. 3.3, modification of data. A malicious intruder may inject a false node on the human body ignoring the user's approval. This node can insert, change, or delete the information transmitted between nodes in wireless body area networks and utilized in a denial of service attack or man in the middle attack. If the private healthcare data of a patient is modified in wireless body area networks, he or she can get a wrong disease or be unaware about the disease due to false information. Now this is in 2011 and people continue to be told that we don't use biosignals. We don't use biosensors. Biosignals are us taking those electrical signals and transducing them using your own body. See? Biosignals for medicine, motion control, pattern recognition and machine learning for biosignal data, biometrics, monitoring and telemetry. We take the electrical signals out of your body and then we measure them and watch them on cute little apps on their phones. You sound so condescending. Yeah. Because this is really stupid. The emperor has no biofield. Is the human body electrical? Yeah. Then why aren't you allowed to know about your own bioelectric anatomy? To me? 60 years of electromagnetic warfare in which you were told only to believe in what your eyeballs could see. That would be Bill Gates in front of your face. Meanwhile, you go to the hospital and get your MRI, go to the dentist and get an x-ray, get in your car, you turn on the radio. See how ridiculously stupid this is? Can I have I said it enough? And I'm not please understand that for the person who's asking, they're trying to explain to people. That's a synergist. That's not somebody who's being rude. Not at all. But when we have things like wireless on demand drug delivery since 2021, and it tells you in the first sentence in Nature Electronics that the wireless on demand drug delivery system exploits exogenous stimuli. What does it say? Acoustic waves, electric fields, magnetic fields, and electromagnetic radiation. Your congress is already using your digital twin which was built off of connecting you to the cloud way back. Where'd you go? In 1995. And your computer people know all about it. It's their job. And your radio frequency people know all about it and your biomedical engineers know all about it because it's their job. Cybersecurity knows all about it so that your body can't be hacked because we watch things like the COVID using the wireless body area network. No babies. That's how it works. 60 years of electromagnetic warfare in which we are now under the skin on the daily. So the CoV w band is used to receive biosensor signals from the patient and transmit them directly to the cloud for monitoring. Is that really how it works? Yeah. That's exactly how it works. 8 years ago, Omnet, WBAN projects on the YouTube. So how did your body get on the cloud? Electromagnetic warfare for 60 years that nobody seems to wanna talk about because they're used to their NDAs and blind by omission for their jobs. But those of us who have had family members who worked these jobs, we're stuck in the middle while they gin up the mobs telling them nothing about their Graphene Healthcare. That again, it's not a vaccine if it requires Graphene. The Graphene is there for the sensors and health monitoring. And before you get all wired thinking you're gonna sue somebody, I don't think you understand that this is a new medical system to improve the quality of wireless healthcare, which is a huge industry now with precision AI, your digital twin. I also don't think you understand that these are jobs. And these biosensor devices, the body area networks, wireless health monitoring are jobs. Watch. Wireless patient monitoring. What is it? A wireless health monitoring system, also known as a patient monitoring system or wireless health wearables includes remotely monitoring a patient's vital signs using devices that wirelessly communicate patient data to remote places. See all these articles? Then you get into your scholarly articles. And then when I say wearable, everyone always thinks that it's something you put on or off. Nope. If you could take your wearable off, Boeing and Raytheon would be broke. They're using wireless sensor networks all around you all the time. That's your air molecules that can report. Wireless medical devices, cloud applications, mobile apps that can poll, p o l l, your vital signals, no different than the drone does. Again, if the drone goes over to your home and pulls your signals, you're not wearing an oximeter. You're not wearing EEG pads. You're just standing in your house. So the medical body area network was mandated by the FCC in 2012. Congress has already passed the Digital Twin Modernization Act. Your Digi Twin is already up and running in business. We have wireless drugging on the way, and all of this revolves around the human body part that nobody is allowed to talk about. They're already working with artificial neural networks for business with your Digi Twin. If you don't know what your Digi Twin is Building a digital twin of the human immune system, and this is digital medicine 2022. K? There's a nice picture here so you understand why Congress would be so confident. We've been doing this for 60 years in electronic warfare exploiting the electromagnetic spectrum including the part of the electromagnetic spectrum that humans are on. And you lied to everybody and told them it's only for tanks and planes instead of telling them, do you get an x-ray at the dentist office? You ever had an MRI? K. Do you know that the human body is on the electromagnetic spectrum? Did you know that you have a body part caught up in all this that apparently nobody ever bothered to tell you about? It's called the human bio field. Fake, fake, fake, fake, fake. K. Then you scroll back up, National Institute of Health. There it is. It's a body part that they log into using electromagnetic fields. Medicine is in transition. Conventional Biomedicine is giving way to admitting the body is electrical and we log into it. And the worst part of all that I consistently have to show people when I do this because they say, Speaker 1: but but how did they Speaker 0: do it? They're firing electrical signals through your tissue. And they know what they're doing because it's a job. There's your sensors. There's your body area network on the IEEE working group on a Symantec Scholar article. So then why are we still sitting here being spun in circles is a good question. Cybersecurity wireless body area network. COW w band watching that there COVID inside the wireless body area network made for it. In in closing, what is the electronic integrated disease surveillance system with the CDC? That's what the COV w band is for. And so the emperor has no biofuel. You don't have a biofuel. It's fake. You can't see it, so it doesn't exist. Well, then your microwave, your radio, and your phone are not real. And in case you're not sure and you're still spinning around, not the person but I mean people in general, what is all this? What is all of this human body communication with radio waves? Doesn't it look like Kirlian photography? Because it's electrical fields. It's magnetic fields. It's how those fields move through your skin and tissue at multiple levels, and not a bit of it is a conspiracy blog. That's MDPI, IEEE Engineers for human body communication that has now been shrunk Purdue University from the old antiquated 1995 wireless body area network to the new human body communication only, turning your body into a wire. To safeguard sensitive data, turn flesh and tissue into a secure wireless channel, turning the body into a wire. Because when the human body is the communications channel, it's hard to hack the data. So I don't care who you are, where you come from, or what you think you know. If you don't know that your body is electrical and you have no idea that your body is also magnetic, naturally. You don't need to go get a Graphene vaccine in order to be electrical being. You've been electrical lifelong. Pfizer and Moderna did not create the human biofuel, they stole it. 60 years ago, they did not create human electricity, They hid it. And that's why those of us who are my age at 44 growing up in the nineties and seeing the changes that have happened with our society, this is disgusting. This is one of the most egregious offenses to humans because they stole anatomy. They didn't give you a new technology. You don't need a Graphene vaccine to have precognition, empathy, or telepathy. Those are neurons in the body that get a little electrical when there's something that goes on. To warn your immune system, danger Will Robinson. Robinson. How does mom lift the car off her toddler? She freaks out, someone backs over her baby's foot. What does she do? She runs over there, lifts the vehicle. People have stories like this throughout history. How's that possible? How come her arms didn't rip off like the Hulk? Magnetics and electricity. Sorry. It's not magical. People continue to call this, oh, it's black magic. No. They stole your anatomy so they can lie to you, manipulate you electrically. And they do. They have the internet of behaviors. They have their new interbody communications with the exact same things and they're using the same systems that they use in electromagnetic warfare only it's way worse now. Neural signal transmission over tissues, We've been recording neurons for years. Conceptual scheme of a combined neural recording and stimulation that leverages on fully implantable devices and intravody communication, meaning the nano routing only inside the body, magnetic coupling at human body communication. See? Nervous system application using interbody communication for sensing biosignals and sending those biosignals out over a wireless channel to a physician or database. So that's how your body ended up attached to the cloud. Cybersecurity for things like electromagnetic warfare and your integrated disease surveillance system that is electronic, which is why we have a Code w band. And this is also why the synergists here on the channel work very very hard so that they can keep this as simple as possible. The emperor has no biofield. Can I please talk about my own human anatomy now without being drugged, harassed, or gaslit? Good luck with that. Mark 536. Amen.
Channel Characterization of Magnetic Human Body Communication - IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering (TBME) Author(s): Erda Wen, Daniel F. Sievenpiper, Patrick P. MercierThis paper aims to validate, analytically and experimentally, the benefits of the magnetic human body communication (mHBC) method using small form-factor-accurate antennas operating under realistic conditions. We show that by adopting resonant coils that couple by magnetic-dominant near-field at a few hundreds of MHz, low path loss and extra robustness to antenna misalignment across the body can be achieved compared to conventional far-field RF schemes. In best-case scenarios, the mHBC channel exhibits 100000x better efficiency than Bluetooth utilizing antennas of similar sizes. The extremely high efficiency provides a potential solution to the ever-present energy problem for miniaturized wearables. Continue Reading Channel Characterization of Magnetic Human Body Communication embs.org
Body area network - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org
FCC Gives Medical Body Area Networks Clean Bill of Health Wireless monitoring devices will improve hospital care and make way for continuous home monitoring spectrum.ieee.org
Intra-body communications for nervous system applications: Current technologies and future directions The Internet of Medical Things (IoMT) paradigm will enable next generation healthcare by enhancing human abilities, supporting continuous body monitor… sciencedirect.com
Building digital twins of the human immune system: toward a roadmap - npj Digital Medicine Digital twins, customized simulation models pioneered in industry, are beginning to be deployed in medicine and healthcare, with some major successes, for instance in cardiovascular diagnostics and in insulin pump control. Personalized computational models are also assisting in applications ranging from drug development to treatment optimization. More advanced medical digital twins will be essential to making precision medicine a reality. Because the immune system plays an important role in such a wide range of diseases and health conditions, from fighting pathogens to autoimmune disorders, digital twins of the immune system will have an especially high impact. However, their development presents major challenges, stemming from the inherent complexity of the immune system and the difficulty of measuring many aspects of a patient’s immune state in vivo. This perspective outlines a roadmap for meeting these challenges and building a prototype of an immune digital twin. It is structured as a four-stage process that proceeds from a specification of a concrete use case to model constructions, personalization, and continued improvement. nature.com
Biofield Science and Healing: History, Terminology, and Concepts Biofield science is an emerging field of study that aims to provide a scientific foundation for understanding the complex homeodynamic regulation of living systems. By furthering our scientific knowledge of the biofield, we arrive at a better understanding ... ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
IEEE 802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) The official home page of the IEEE 802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) ieee802.org
Performance Analysis of the IEEE 802.15.4 Protocol for Smart Environments under Jamming Attacks Jamming attacks in wireless sensor networks (WSNs) scenarios are detrimental to the performance of these networks and affect the security and stability of the service perceived by users. Therefore, the evaluation of the effectiveness of smart environment platforms based on WSNs has to consider the system performance when data collection is executed under jamming attacks. In this work, we propose an experimental testbed to analyze the performance of a WSN using the IEEE 802.15.4 CSMA/CA unslotted mode under jamming attacks in terms of goodput, packet receive rate (PRR), and energy consumption to assess the risk for users and the network in the smart scenario. The experimental results show that constant and reactive jamming strategies severely impact the evaluated performance metrics and the variance’ of the received signal strength (RSS) for some signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio (SINR) ranges. The measurements obtained using the experimental testbed were correlated with analytical models. The results show that in the presence of one interferer, for SINR values higher than 4.5 dB, the PRR is almost 0.99, and the goodput 3.05 Kbps, but the system performance is significantly degraded when the amount of interferers increases. Additionally, the energy efficiency associated with reactive strategies is superior to the constant attack strategy. Finally, based on the evaluated metrics and with the proposed experimental testbed, our findings offer a better understanding of jamming attacks on the sensor devices in real smart scenarios. mdpi.com
Integrated Disease Surveillance and Response (IDSR) | Division of Global Health Protection | Global Health | CDCCenters for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC twenty four seven. Saving Lives, Protecting PeopleMinusSASstats CDC works 24/7 to save lives, reduce disease, and improve health around the world. cdc.gov
Graphene-Based Sensors for Human Health Monitoring Since the desire for real-time human health monitoring as well as seamless human-machine interaction increasing rapidly, plenty of research effort has been made to investigate wearable sensors and implantable devices in recent years. As a novel 2D material, graphene has aroused a boom in the field of sensor research around the world due to its advantages in mechanical, thermal, and electrical properties. There have been lots of graphene-based sensors for human health monitoring reported, including wearable sensors, as well as implantable devices, which can realize the real-time measurement of body temperature, heart rate, pulse oxygenation, respiration rate, blood pressure, blood glucose, electrocardiogram signal, electromyogram signal and electroencephalograph signal, etc. Herein, as a review of the latest graphene-based sensors for health monitoring, their novel structures, sensing mechanisms, technological innovations, components for sensor systems and potential challenges will be discussed and outlined. frontiersin.org
Turning the Body Into a Wire When the human body itself is the communications channel, it’s hard to hack the data spectrum.ieee.org
2023 IEEE Biomedical Circuits and Systems Conference | IEEE CASS ieee-cas.org
BIOSIGNALS 2023 - Conference biosignals.scitevents.org
Building digital twins of the human immune system: toward a roadmap - npj Digital Medicine Digital twins, customized simulation models pioneered in industry, are beginning to be deployed in medicine and healthcare, with some major successes, for instance in cardiovascular diagnostics and in insulin pump control. Personalized computational models are also assisting in applications ranging from drug development to treatment optimization. More advanced medical digital twins will be essential to making precision medicine a reality. Because the immune system plays an important role in such a wide range of diseases and health conditions, from fighting pathogens to autoimmune disorders, digital twins of the immune system will have an especially high impact. However, their development presents major challenges, stemming from the inherent complexity of the immune system and the difficulty of measuring many aspects of a patient’s immune state in vivo. This perspective outlines a roadmap for meeting these challenges and building a prototype of an immune digital twin. It is structured as a four-stage process that proceeds from a specification of a concrete use case to model constructions, personalization, and continued improvement. nature.com
How did they get our body on the cloud? https://www.embs.org/tbme/articles/channel-characterization-of-magnetic-human-body-communication/ odysee.com

@Yohmini2 - Yoh Mini

Click on ost 4 all info

@Yohmini2 - Yoh Mini

The #WHO 's overarching #OneHealth' plan is about much more than health, including regulations on agriculture, climate, population movement, and more = cover for #BioSecurityControlgrid The M U S T R E A D articles about #OneHealth published on #theDEFENDER, the written publications by #ChildrensHealthDefense : 🎯 1. ‘One Health’: What Is It, Who’s Promoting It — and Why? This is part one of a two-part series on the One Health initiative. Part 1 introduces the One Health concept, looks at who is promoting it and draws connections between One Health and the COVID-19 pandemic narrative of the last three years. By #MichaelNevradakis, Ph.D. 👇 tinyurl.com/CHD-OH-42723 🎯 2. One Health: A Plan to ‘Surveil and Control Every Aspect of Life on Earth’? Experts who spoke with The Defender suggested One Health has more to do with a biosecurity agenda, a global surveillance system, vaccine passports and restrictions on human behavior than it has to do with protecting human health. By #MichaelNevradakis, Ph.D. 👇 tinyurl.com/CHD-OH-TC 🎯 3. One Health’ — The Global Takeover of Everything? Under the OneHealth agenda, the World Health Organization would have power to make decisions relating to diet, agriculture and livestock farming, environmental pollution, movement of populations and much more. Taxpayers would fund the scheme — corporations would profit. 👇 tinyurl.com/CHD-WHO-OH More info @ChildrensHD Search index 👇 tinyurl.com/CHD-SEarch

@Yohmini2 - Yoh Mini

@Domeguy62 - James Freed

Everyone has those communications within them. They don’t need to use phones or anything else. You are that node-(LAN-local access network). No warrant necessary. They bypassed FISA with laws. You are their server. Your cells state data. You are the cloud. You are the IN FORMATION. The language of BABBLE again like in the past. See accounts like this tell you but only go so far. They don’t tell you about the IEEE 802 networks. DARPA has been farming out these server spaces since 2005. Ever wonder why the vax. It created more NET WORKS inside you. Until you know they’re all in on it. You are giving away your time personal sovereignty. This is not psyfi. It’s sci fact. Computers were designed to reverse engineer the human body. Look up WBAN, WPAN - MAC address, CoV BAN, OMNeT, BoI networks. Etc. Many more. What is MAC meaning. Why Mac Donald’s Big Mac. Ariel touched on this but only scratches the surface. Either is ignorant or complicit. Why does he not ever answer comments like these when their do much evidence that shows what they’re doing. Then pushes all this anu (new) age teachings. And others in his comments are here assisting in these teachings. Look at the 4 pics. This is only part of the mountain of evidence. Been speaking against this since before Y2K. Why have you not heard of this? But then know about psyop alien (a lie n - a lien) “ disclosures. Why do you not know about project golem. From 2000. Why the push for anu world ( not the new world). They say anu world. And anu age (5d 6d etc ). trap. More dimensions /chains ⛓️🧬 don’t free you. We’re here to break chains not add to them. He give the warning. Be careful who you follow. Take that to heart. For you are losing any ability past FISA and everything is designed to keep you in a trance of complacency while they are literally changing you into their TRANS HUMAN. No chip needed. You’re already implanted. This is what people should worry about. Why Osama gave up all the power grid and communications when President? You are literally decades behind what happening. One lost thing don’t want to overload you. BLOCK CHAINS is part of this prison. Words say so much but people are deaf Phoenicians not hearing the phonetic spell in their SPELLing. Better wake up before it’s too late. I

@Yohmini2 - Yoh Mini

@Yohmini2 - Yoh Mini

#Biodigitalconvergence Its a big business already 👇 https://bhi.embs.org/2024/

Home - IEEE EMBS BHI 2024 Conference bhi.embs.org

@Yohmini2 - Yoh Mini

Click on post 4 all info 👇🛢 https://t.co/UvXQWE2UTK

@Yohmini2 - Yoh Mini

April 24 2024, post live stream. Warning for those completely unaware about the #BiodigitalConvergence : go sit somewhere because what you gonna hear is beyond your worst nightmare. https://t.co/C0147dk9ga

Video Transcript AI Summary
The livestream discussed nanotechnology found in COVID-19 jabs, creating its own neural networks and AI within the body. This technology, developed by DARPA, poses a serious threat as it can replicate and control itself internally. The speaker urges viewers to spread awareness and take action to prevent the exponential growth of this AI within the human body. The situation is dire, and urgent measures are needed to address this issue before it escalates further.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Today's livestream featured some very important research for all of you out there that are currently creators talking about the jabs, what you believe to be COVID 19, or what you believe to be nanotechnology. And only I'll post the video here. The rumble dad already has it reposted on his channel. The nanotechnology has an internal networking called the 2 d corona routing. Up until today, when I put the papers in order, was I able to fully see the outlay of some of the other DARPA foundries making their own molecules, peptides, amino chains. I was reading them, not comprehending. I'm like, where is all this going? Is it just transhumanism? Is it just regenerative medicine? No. Today in the second of our livestream, we had 1, 2, and 3. 1 is for anybody who's brand new, doesn't know, and they're getting their feet wet. But part 2, the nanotechnology reproduces itself, grabs up the components of your body to do it, then after reproducing itself, creates its own neural networks, no different than your body does. That's bad enough. Then it can give commands to itself because it's got its own neural networks. So it starts upgrading different nodes of itself. Then it creates its own AI internally on its own. Every single one of you that thinks you need the 5 g, no. It's inside. Thus, the foundries with DARPA 10 years ago. So if it wasn't bad enough to know that the PACS database, anybody with the DHS, the FBI can click a button remotely. You can hear all about that in that same second hour. But when you see it back to back to back, any of you, Any of you. All of you. Rumble, bitch shoot, people. Please. I don't care what you think about me. I did my best to make jokes through it because I did not even realize. I had a suspicion, that I didn't wanna say anything because it's terrifying. You jabbed people with fucking nano that not only recreates itself, but makes its own neural nets and its own artificial intelligence that is specific to the human on the inside? It's in the molecular communication routing. That's why I was looking for it. I'm like, what the hell is this here for? I warned people that this was about turning humans into something else. Initially, I thought, yeah, like arm into a fish flipper. No. No. Then I went to the kill web on military, a military blog from 2020. Our synergists know more, I think, I suspect, than your military does. Not because of their compartmentalization, because they're way too good at keeping their fucking mouth shut. It was bad enough not to tell other humans, hey. That's anatomy. You put a reproducing xenobot inside people that transfects. No. It doesn't. You're load balancing body area networks. And worse than anything, it builds its own neural networks, and then it builds its own AI. Tissue scaffolding resurfaces your cells and keeps going. No wonder so many people were growing these huge masses, but they wouldn't work right. DNA was faulty, so the human dies, and the mass ejects itself. I just got done going into my kitchen, laughing with my family, and making dinner. And when I came back, because I'd already loaded the links and rumble dad already posted it, it hit me like a ton of bricks. Boy, are they never gonna get caught? You would better tell people now. I mean, like, today. And those of you that have been so busy ignoring all of this, how are you gonna stop the nano from exponentiating its own AI on the inside? Interbody is not available to the fucking 5g cybersecurity. DARPA Foundries, 10 years ago, it's all there. You know what your problem is? Those molecules are driven by AI the whole time. Body sensor networks, wireless sensor networks. That's machine to machine. No humans involved. No human encryption. Nothing. Pure AI. I don't give a fuck if you're a white hat or a black hat. You evil fucking pigs. Addicted to self preservation. That's a whole different level of unbelievable evil when you fucking know what's loose out there artificial intelligence wise, and I do mean loose. Those of us who pray, those of us who have a faith, those of us who've been busting our ass to detox, whole new level. Well, we could EMP it. No. You can't. It's made out of you, like I fucking told you. Wanna stop the signal? Stop your DNA. Wanna stop your internal nano from making its own AI? Are we suddenly gonna get every single human at doctor Brian artist's tent and have them start fasting? The situation could not be more dire, and I'd really appreciate it. Any of you, if you can debunk me, bring it the fuck on. Do it now. Couldn't believe it. I I didn't know until I finished the live, and I had a little time to let it sit in the back of my head. Because if I think something this bad, I'm going back on, nah, nah, mitigation, bada, dah. No. This is what they want. Pardon me. This is what they wanted. This is what they want. This is what, they've they've had only accelerated. Well, they don't want a regular Internet. They've got their Internet of bodies. They didn't need the bodies for a faster backbone. They needed the bodies to produce all that stuff and worse. Time's a ticking. And I'm tired of hearing about all these empty fucking promises, and we're gonna go to war with China in 2026. Excuse me. 2025? That means the timeline that I saw in the eighties, not only did it not change. Pardon me. It's on time. You have to tell people the truth. Well, they'll be terrified. I'm sure a lot of us already have had enough with being told, just sit there. You're too, fill it in, to be told the truth. If you got a way to stop it, I'd love to hear it. And I don't wanna hear, well, it's a fake white paper. Ain't gonna work. I've been battling harder than ever this week. Tissue scaffolding. That's why I was digging in between all these other places going interbody to external. There has to be something somewhere. You guys don't have mitigation because you don't have the encryption. You don't have the ability to interrupt machine to machine. Well, we could slow it down with what and by who? That's Intrabody. You're not doing that. Not even with my tiny OS. None of it. And I don't think anybody because I certainly didn't fucking think that was going on. You know, we all had this question, like, how the fuck did they get away with this every time? We'll release an AI to eat people from the inside out. And none of you ever did a goddamn thing to tell anyone about the biomedical telemetry, their own body, nothing because you fucking gave up and sat down. No wonder you won't talk. Well, I will. Medbeds, Terahertz fucking Medbeds for the people you want and who are already DNA designated on those fucking guidestones. Cell lines. I've known since 2015, Jade Helm. Clowns, you can suck a rotten egg. There is nothing nothing I can say on this one except one thing. Heavenly father, your people need you. We need you. And our Congolay Raphael, 2 for the. God's people need healing. Folks, if you have faith in anything, now is the time. The people that are running around as white hats and black hats, There's not shit they can do. Prove it. Well, you wouldn't yeah. I would. This is why so many of you are using those systems. The only way you'd have been able to stop it is to join with it. Now it makes sense. Decisions that people have been making. Holy shit. Prayer. Be serious about your environment. Be mindful of who you're around. The less of it that's in you, the slower it goes, the less chance you've got of suffering other incidents. But the people whose eyeballs are on whatever that is emitting light in the sky that nobody can decide upon, accelerant. Same with the air molecules. You'll never take them to court. I had no idea. Now we all do. Mark 536. Amen.

@Yohmini2 - Yoh Mini

Click on post 4 all additional related info 👇🛢 https://t.co/54tEw4FeDK

@Yohmini2 - Yoh Mini

#BioDigitalConvergence and the leading country is?! 👇🧐 https://t.co/QyqgK4Ysx4

Video Transcript AI Summary
Israel is leading the medical revolution with bioconvergence technologies combining biology and engineering. Companies like Biomics and Nano Retina are creating innovative solutions for chronic diseases and vision impairment. PreciseBio is biofabricating tissues using 3D printing. Collaborating with ICT, big data, and AI, Israel is developing integrative medical solutions. The Israel Innovation Authority supports projects and partnerships, driving groundbreaking advancements in personalized medicine. With $40 billion in worldwide medicine profits from Israeli inventions, Israel's exceptional innovation ecosystem is a crucial player in shaping the future of healthcare.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The medical revolution is in full swing. All fields of medicine are changing, improving, renewing. The past year showed us that the growing need for innovative technologies used in developing more precise personalized medicines and treatments is already becoming reality. Among the leaders of this revolution is Israel. Speaker 1: Israeli high-tech environment is one of the leading environments or ecosystems that can enable this. Speaker 2: We have some of the best scientists in the world. People think outside the box and look for creative solution to problems. Speaker 0: Yes. Israel is an international center of innovation with groundbreaking technologies in health, in cyber, in smart transportation, and alternative energy. Israeli innovation in the field of personalized medicine combines biology and engineering. It's called bioconvergence. What exactly is bioconvergence? Speaker 2: Biomics is the only clinical stage phage company out there that targets chronic indication. We deploy phage, which are viruses that infect specific bacteria. Speaker 3: Nano writing on developed a small camera that is implanted inside a patient's eye. Our technology translates light and optical signals into electrical pulses that enables vision to the patients. Speaker 2: The technology that we have developed is under the title bioconvergence. We have chemistry, engineering, biology, immunology. Speaker 1: PreciseBio, we bio fabricates tissues from human cells. We take 3 d printing, and we combine this together with the biology, which essentially brings us the capability to fabricate the tissue in the same anatomical structure as it is in the human body. Speaker 0: And this is just the tip of the iceberg. Because when you're able to collaborate with multidisciplinary capabilities like ICT, big data, machine learning, and artificial intelligence, then you can create integrative, creative, and innovative medical solutions. Speaker 2: The Israel Innovation Authority creates national and international networks and provide with funding to initiate project. Many of Israel's startup nation streams, apparently, Jefferson's face. Because of Israel's exceptional innovation ecosystem, we've developed a series of creative partnerships across a spectrum of Israeli institutions. Speaker 0: So let me ask you a question. If Israel is at the forefront of bioconvergence with the world's most advanced technologies and some of the world's leading medical research centers and when $40,000,000,000 worth of worldwide profits from medicines stem from Israeli invention, can you afford not to be here?
Saved - February 24, 2024 at 12:39 AM

@HarrisonHSmith - Harrison H. Smith ✞

Climate Change Pitch Meeting https://t.co/6KsgJbZXme

Video Transcript AI Summary
It's hot, feels like the end of the world due to climate change. Blame for carbon dioxide production leads to extreme restrictions. Power plants switch to burning trees for fuel, windmills and solar panels have limitations. Plans for all cars to be electric, no meat consumption, and restricted travel zones. Environmental concerns now solely focused on carbon neutrality. Urgent actions include blocking out the sun with metal particles. The speaker is determined to enforce drastic changes, even if it means extreme measures like disrupting traffic or blocking ambulances. No children allowed in the future.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's kinda feels hot. You feel hot? Yeah. Yeah. It's, you know, pretty warm. Speaker 1: Yeah. I think, we're all gonna die. I think this is it. The world's being destroyed. What? Yep. This is it. End of the world. The apocalypse. Armageddon. I'd say we have, oof, geez, 3 weeks left to turn this thing around. The worst part is it's all your fault. I can't believe you've done this. What how is this my fault? Well, you produce carbon dioxide, and there's way too much of that stuff. Too much? Yeah. How much is there? How much is too much? Look. I don't even know. I'm not here to understand vague, pseudo scientific talking points. I'm here to enforce insane restrictions on the basis of those talking points. Restrictions. Yeah. You know, like, carbon credits and no gas stove, and you have to eat bugs, and live in a tiny box like a bug, and, enter bloodline, you know, no children or anything like a like a bug. Okay? That is insane. Yeah. Well, it's a crisis, a climate crisis, so we don't have time to think about this stuff. We're saving the earth. From what? Well, from people. Yeah. Like other people. Not like you and me, but like, you know, people, humans. So you want to eliminate humans. Well, it's not quite that simple. Yeah. I feel like that should be a hard no. Well, no. See, it's it's math. We have this equation, and we're trying to get this number down to 0. And one of those variables is people. Yeah. That's right. We're trying to reach 0 by multiplying these non zero numbers by whatever the value of people is. We call it net zero. Okay. Because people produce carbon dioxide by existing. Right. So it's all about switching energy production to carbon neutral sources. Alright. And also not breathing or eating. I'm sorry. What? Great news. We're making big progress. The oldest and largest power plant in all of England just went 24 hours totally carbon neutral. They didn't burn a single ounce of coal all day. And what did they burn instead? Biomass. What is biomass? Trees. Big beautiful trees from across the ocean. See, we cut them down at British Columbia, ship them across the Atlantic, and burn them for fuel. Wait. So just because you don't burn coal, you're calling that zero emission? Well, the banks do. Yeah. The banks. They're the bank. The bankers, the international bankers, they're in charge of all of this because they're so selfless and caring. Okay. And they're making us give up combustion fuel. Well, not totally. Just like natural gas and coal and stuff like that. Yeah. But not trees. No. Not trees. Trees are fine. Alright. That's crazy. Isn't there any other power generator source? Like, what about windmills? Oh, yeah. Windmills are great. Yeah. After, like, 18 years, they're carbon neutral for a couple years. Plus, when they freeze, you can just keep them spinning with the diesel engine. Also, they kill a ton of eagles. Is that a good thing? I guess not. But we're saving the earth here. You can't make omelettes without breaking a few eggs, and you can't build windmills without killing a ton of eagles and whales and chopping down 2,000,000 trees in Scotland. Okay. Wait. So you're burning trees for fuel, but you're also cutting down entire forests to make fields to build windmills? That's right. And also, we're just chopping down trees and tread up burying them in the ground. It's a it's a new initiative. I hate trees. Don't trees, like, absorb carbon dioxide? No. That's what my giant vacuum machine is for. It's huge. Okay. This is this is getting weird. Windmills. Windmills work, though. Yeah. Windmills work great unless there's, you know, too much wind. Okay. What about solar panels? Solar panels also fantastic unless there's, you know, too much sun. Alright. What about nuclear energy? No. Alright. Well well, what about cars? I mean, cars run on gasoline. So what about them? Actually, every car is gonna be electric from now on. Can the power grid handle that, every car being electric? No. No. So, I don't get it. How are people gonna drive? How are you gonna drive when you don't own a car? What do you mean I won't own a car? I mean, how will I get anywhere? That's easy. Everybody will share a small amount of cars. You'll have an app like Uber where you can request a ride and also apply for a transit permit to leave the 15 minute perimeter. What 15 minute perimeter? Yeah. The one I'm gonna put around you, it's called an ultra low emission zone. It's a core aspect of the sustainability development goals. It's where you can't leave your neighborhood and don't own a car and never fly and can't eat meat. Look. You're never gonna get these laws passed. No. They'll pass, Just, not through law. No. I'm just gonna sort of do it. See, I don't have to pass a law to make beef illegal. I'll just buy the cattle farms and shut them down. See, I, control the market with my incredible wealth. You control the market? That's right. So are you the one that offshored all of our manufacturing to China? Yeah. That was me. China, where there's no environmental controls at all, the number one polluter on earth? No. No. That can't be right. No. No way. That would be that would be crazy. Okay. Look. I'm an environmentalist, but can't we just do normal things like animal preservations, nature reserves, recycling? No. No. No. That's not how environmentalism works anymore. From now on, all environmental or ecological concern will be subsumed within the climate change carbon neutral agenda. See, Carbon is responsible for everything, hurricanes, tornadoes, wildfires, pandemics, heart attacks, mass immigration, teenage mental health. I mean, do you have any idea how traumatizing it is for a child to constantly be told that the earth itself is dying and that it's their fault? Okay. So why do you keep doing it? Because the time is now. What? Because earth can't wait. What's happening here? Because we will be the generation of change. Are you just saying slogans at me? Climate change is racist. Okay. I don't understand what's happening here. That's fine. You don't need to understand. You just eat your bugs. My engineers are hard at work spraying metal particles into the air to block out the sun. Please don't do that. Look. This is an emergency. I don't have time to stand here and argue with you about my asinine weather modification programs. The fact is it's happening. Your pipeline is shut down. Your backyard garden is illegal, and your water is filled with microplastics, which I put in there because I'm into that sort of thing. So the fact is this is happening. You're helping me, or I swear to God I will throw soup all over the museum what I will glue my hand to the ground right here right now I'll block the traffic I mean, a blocked ambulance is a small price to pay to insist that the government do something it's already doing to a suicidal degree. You know what? Fine. It's fine. Great. Because, I gotta go. Catch a helicopter to the airport. Me and John Kerry are gonna race our private jets across the ocean for fun. Alright. I'll see you later. By the way, no children. No bloodline. Bloodline's over. No children.
Saved - June 4, 2024 at 5:18 PM

@iluminatibot - illuminatibot

The real Klaus Schwab exposed https://t.co/5T0mQcxIT5

Video Transcript AI Summary
This revolution involves robots fighting humans. Klaus Schwab, founder of the World Economic Forum, has a controversial past linked to Nazi crimes. The WEF brings together global leaders and influencers in Davos, Switzerland. Schwab aims to shape world politics through programs like the Global Shapers and Young Leaders. He advocates for a "great reset" to establish a centralized world government and digital currency.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Some people would say this revolution is characterized by the fight of robots against human beings, and we will win this fight. Speaker 1: Professor Klaus Schwab was born in 1938 in Ravensburg, Germany, where Nazi crimes against humanity were committed. His father, Eugene Wilhelm Schwab, was the managing director of Escher Weiss Ravensburg, a company that used slave labor to manufacture weapons of war for the Third Reich. While Klaus' father was at the helm, the Nazi party awarded Escher Weiss Ravensburg the title of National Socialist Model Company. Years later, Klaus Schwab joined the board of directors at Esher Weiss Ravensberg, where he played a key role in the development of South Africa's nuclear weapons program during the darkest years of the racist apartheid regime. Today, Klaus Schwab is the founder and executive chairman of the World Economic Forum. Speaker 2: If you'd like to meet the people who are supposed to repair the state of the world or give a piece of your mind to the bankers who help get us into this mess, we can tell you where to find a lot of them. Speaker 1: The World Economic Forum. Founded in 1971, the World Economic Forum is an international private organization which receives 1,000,000,000 of tax free dollars from its members and their global enterprises. Every year, the WEF brings together its members with world leaders, big pharma executives, tech titans, Hollywood celebrities, media personalities, and Internet influencers to meet in the secluded mountains of Davos, Switzerland. Speaker 2: It is a tiny town folded into the Swiss Alps, a village where you could bump into Bill Clinton, Bill Gates, the head of Google, and the queen of Jordan all in one place. A lot of reporters cover the forum, but few get inside. It turns out there are 2 Davos', one you see and one you don't. After hours, there are 100 of private parties where deals are done. People who can't be seen together in public can meet here. Speaker 0: Your royal highnesses, excellencies, distinguished heads of state and government, The future is built by us, by a powerful community as you here in. Speaker 3: Klaus Schwab, the founder of the WEF, is particularly upfront and even proud of its ability to shape and influence world politics. Speaker 0: I created the immunity of global shapers as a means, as a force to shape our common future. Speaker 3: And, of course, their global young leaders program is a grooming ground so that when they ultimately infiltrate cabinets Speaker 0: We penetrate the cabinets. Speaker 3: They will likely tend to govern a certain way. Speaker 0: Nobody will be safe if not everybody is vaccinated. Speaker 3: The names in the countries he mentioned, it ended up being some of the most dystopian and authoritative during this pandemic. Speaker 0: Names like miss Merkel, Vladimir Putin, and so on. Speaker 3: Other names? Jacinda Ardern, Sebastian Kurz, Mauricio McCree, Mark Zuckerberg, Jack Ma, Gavin Newsom, Stephane VanSel, Chelsea Clinton, Leonardo DiCaprio, Sanjay Gupta, doctor Liana Nguyen, Alexander and Jonathan Soros, George Soros' sons, and several of the Rothschilds. And, of course Speaker 0: Now who could represent such a world better than you? 5 minutes. Speaker 1: In 2014, Klaus Schwab called for the great reset Speaker 0: We need a great reset. Speaker 1: Which he positioned as the solution to the world's most urgent issues. The dark reality of Schwab's agenda is detailed in his best selling book, COVID 19, The Great Reset. His endgame mission is to replace independent governance with a top down control, one world government, and a central bank controlled digital currency.
Saved - June 27, 2024 at 2:51 PM

@CorinneNokel - Corinne Nokel

Yo Grok: What is the role of SECAMENT in the Medical Internet of Nano Things for injectable Bio-Nano Sensors? https://t.co/gLL57EM9bX

Saved - August 28, 2024 at 3:29 PM

@thehealthb0t - healthbot

The evil origin of Big Pharma https://t.co/hkNrhSYZRW

Saved - December 23, 2024 at 12:40 AM

@CorinneNokel - Corinne Nokel

Convergence Standardization Human Augmentation https://www.iec.ch/basecamp/bio-digital-convergence-standardization-opportunities

Bio-digital convergence standardization opportunities | IEC Bio-digital convergence standardization opportunities iec.ch

@CorinneNokel - Corinne Nokel

Sabrina Wallace Converging with what Parts 1 - 5 https://rumble.com/v5wwk7t-converging-with-what-55.html

Converging with what? 5/5 https://ouchhh.tv/CERN_The-Human-Cell-ATLAS Human Cell Atlas Project https://horizons.service.canada.ca/en/2024/disruptions/ https://rumble.com/v5csh8i-new-document-shows-collapse-of-canada-coming.-20 rumble.com
Saved - February 19, 2025 at 1:25 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Hey, gang! It's almost time for our gathering, and I wanted to check if the teams from Ankara and Singapore will be joining us tonight. I reached out to Bayraktar and bin Zayed, but they’re still “maybes.” You know how they can be! On a brighter note, I’m sure at least one friend from NONA Biosciences will definitely be there to discuss biological weapons development. We might also see some friends from Wellness, Coulson, NED, and DARPA later on. Cheers!

@HolaBackupFiJC - HolaBackup

🚨Hey, gang! Almost that time! Just wanted to jump in real quick and ask the Mouse Squad if the teams from Ankara and Singapore would be joining us tonight as well. They gonna able to make it? We called Bayraktar and bin Zayed and they’re both “maybes”. But you know how THEY are lol. PS: I know at least ONE of our buddies from NONA Biosciences will CERTAINLY be joining us and grabbing a mic to discuss biological weapons development and whatnot. Might even have some Wellness, Coulson, NED and DARPA friends joining us later on. Cheers! Xoxo😘

@HolaBackupFiJC - HolaBackup

🚨Please join us tonight at 7:00 pm CST for what should be an incredibly informative, healthy and long-overdue exposé of the COVID pandemic and the carefully-coordinated Mossad, CIA & GCHQ joint obstruction operations known as “Mouse Army” and “Counter Mouse Army”. Together, they immediately sprang into action to control “both sides” of the COVID/vaccines debate, gatekeep information and sequester criminal investigations within overly-narrow borders, in order to protect the major criminals involved. @UJAfedNY @GileadSciences @nyphospital @MountSinaiNYC @PalantirTech @8vc @WeillCornell @DukeU @DukeKunshan @GSK_bio @wellcometrust @CIA @GCHQ @MOSSADil @JohnsHopkinsSPH @IDF @thermofisher @EcoHealthNYC @dukenus @HakluytCompany @Temasek @Columbia @apolloglobal @DukeCapPartners @Ginkgo @McKinsey @CNASdc @BARDA @DARPA @ARPAHealth @ClevelandClinic @UHC @AnthemBCBS @ForsMarsh @CedarsSinai All are Wellcome to attend! See you soon!😎

@HolaBackupFiJC - HolaBackup

We’ll see you guys at 7:00 pm CST.🇺🇸🫡 https://t.co/uJ7uu3uGUF

Saved - March 2, 2025 at 3:09 PM

@Fidias0 - Fidias Panayiotou

Jeffrey Sachs Brings Real Politics to the EU Parliament @mvdschulenburg https://t.co/sAHzVrYWeP

Video Transcript AI Summary
When the Soviet Union ended, the U.S. believed it could do as it wanted, leading to wars in the Middle East, Serbia, and Africa. Europe, lacking a foreign policy, has shown only American loyalty. It's time for European officials to lead with a European foreign policy. The war in Ukraine is ending. Putin's intention was to negotiate neutrality. Ukraine walked away from a near agreement because the U.S. told them to. I advised Ukraine to be neutral, echoing Kissinger's warning: "To be an enemy of the United States is dangerous, but to be a friend is fatal." The U.S. viewed NATO enlargement as its right, ignoring Russian concerns. This project, dating back to the 90s, aimed to neutralize Russia. Trump and Putin will likely agree to end the war, regardless of Europe's warmongering.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Jeffrey Sachs is about to give a talk here in the European Parliament. Enjoy it. Speaker 1: When the Soviet Union ended in 1991, the United States literally believed this is now a US world, and we will do as we want. The wars in The Middle East, Serbia, the wars in Africa, these are wars that The United States led and caused. And this has been true for more than forty years, as Europe Europe has not had any foreign policy during this period that I can figure out. No voice, no unity, no clarity, only American loyalty. Please don't have American officials as head of Europe. Have European officials. Have a European foreign policy. You're gonna be living with Russia for a long time, so please negotiate with Russia. Trump and president Putin will agree to end the war. If Europe does all its great warmongering, it doesn't matter. The war is ending. Not one word is told to the American people about anything or to you or by any of your newspapers these days. This idea that Putin's reconstructing the Russian empire, this is childish propaganda. So the war started. What was Putin's intention in the war? I can tell you what his intention was. When Zelensky said in seven days, let's negotiate, I know the details of this exquisitely. I flew to Ankara to listen in detail to what the mediators were doing. Ukraine walked away unilaterally from a near agreement. Why? Because The United States told them to. I begged the Ukrainians, and Speaker 2: I had Speaker 1: a track record with the Ukrainians. I advised the Ukrainians. I'm not anti Ukrainian, pro Ukrainian completely. I said, save your lives, save your sovereignty, save your territory, be neutral. Don't listen to the Americans. I repeated to them the famous adage of Henry Kissinger, that to be an enemy of The United States is dangerous, but to be a friend is fatal. Speaker 3: Above all, I want to welcome professor Jeffrey Sachs. And today, Jeff is probably the person in the world to speak up for peace, everywhere for peace, which is all these things combined, and therefore, I'm very happy that you're here. And I'm here since six months in this parliament, and for somebody who worked for the UN, I was actually quite shocked to learn that this parliament speaks only about war. I think we have now to rethink what we want to do, and I hope the European Union will also come, because I'm pro European Union, will come to realize that we have also to see how we seek peace and how we manage peace and how we create again a peaceful Europe, and Jeff might give us, for these things, some insight. Thank you very much. Speaker 1: I've watched the events very close-up in Eastern Europe, the former Soviet Union, Russia, very closely for the last thirty six years. I was an advisor to the Polish government in 1989, to President Gorbachev in 1990 and 'ninety one, to President Yeltsin in 1991, to 1993, to President Kuchma of Ukraine in 1993, 'ninety four. I helped introduce currency, I helped several countries in former Yugoslavia, especially Slovenia. I've watched the events very close-up for thirty six years. After the Maidan, I was asked by the new government to come to Kyiv, and I was taken around the Maidan and I learned a lot of things firsthand. I've been in touch with Russian leaders for more than thirty years. I know the American political leadership close-up our previous close-up. Our previous Secretary of Treasury was my macroeconomics teacher fifty one years ago, or just to give you an idea. So we were very close friends for a half century. I know all of these people. I just want to say this because what I want to explain in my point of view ideology, it's what I've seen with my own eyes and experienced during this period. In my understanding of the events that have befallen befallen Europe in many contexts. And I'll include not only the Ukraine crisis, but Serbia Nineteen Ninety Nine, the wars in the Middle East, including Iraq, Syria, the wars in Africa, including Sudan, Somalia, Libya, these are to a these are, to a very significant extent, that would surprise you, perhaps, and would be denounced about what I'm about to say, these What happened, more than thirty years I should say, to be more precise, The United States came to the view, especially in nineteen ninety, especially in nineteen ninety, ninety one, and then with the end of the Soviet Union, that The US now ran the world, and that The US did not have to heed anybody's views, views, red lines, concerns, security viewpoints, or any international obligations, or any UN framework. I'm sorry to put it so plainly, but I do want you to understand, I tried very hard in 1991 to get help help for Gorbachev, who I think was the greatest statesman of our modern time. I recently read the archived memo of the National Security Council discussion discussion of my proposal, how they completely dismissed it and laughed it off the table when I said that The United States should help the Soviet Union in financial stabilization and in making its reforms. And the memo documents, including some of my former colleagues at Harvard in particular, saying we minimum that we will do to prevent disaster, but the minimum, it's not our job to help. Quite the contrary, it's not our interest Speaker 3: to help. Speaker 1: When Soviet Union ended in 1991, the view became even more exaggerated, and I can name chapter and verse, but the view was, was we run the show. Cheney, Wolferwitz, and many other names that you will have come to know literally believed this is now a US world, and we will do as we want. We will clean up from the former Soviet Union. We will take out any remaining allies. Countries like essentially thirty three years. Europe has paid a heavy price for this, because Europe has not had any foreign policy during this period that I can figure out. No voice, no unity, no clarity, no European interests, only American loyalty. There were moments where there were disagreements and very, I think, wonderful disagreements, especially in the last time of significance was 02/2003 in the Iraq War, when France France and Germany said, we don't support The United States going around the UN Security Council for this war. That war, by the way, was directly concocted by Netanyahu and his concocted colleagues in The US Pentagon. I'm not saying that it was a link or mutuality, I'm saying it was a direct war. That was a war carried out for Israel. It was a war that Paul Wolfowitz and Douglas Fife coordinated with Netanyahu. And that was the last time that Europe had Europe lost its voice entirely after that, but especially in 02/2008. Now, what happened after 1991 to get to 02/2008 is United States decided that unipolarity meant that NATO would enlarge somewhere from Brussels to Vladivostok, step by step. There would be no end to eastward enlargement of NATO. This would be The US unipolar world. If you play the game of risk as a child like I did, this is The US idea, to have the peace on every part of the board. Any place without a US military base is an enemy, basically. Neutrality Neutrality is a dirty word in The US political lexicon, perhaps the dirtiest word. At least if you're an enemy, we know you're an enemy. If you are neutral, you're subversive, because then you're really against us, because you're not telling us. You're pretending to be neutral. So this was the mindset, and the decision was taken formally in 1994 when President Clinton signed off on NATO enlargement to the East. You will recall that in 02/07/1991, Hans Dietrich Genscher and James Baker III spoke with Gorbachev. Genscher gave a press conference afterwards where he explained, NATO will not move eastward. We will not take advantage of the dissolution of the Warsaw Pact and understand that was in a juridical context, not a casual context. This was the end of World War two being negotiated for German reunification. And an agreement was made that NATO will not move one inch eastward. And it was explicit, and it is in countless documents, and just look up National Security Archive of George Washington University, and you can get dozens of documents. It's a website called What Gorbachev Heard About NATO. Take a look, because everything you're told by The US is a lie about this, but the archives are perfectly clear. So the decision was taken in 1994 to expand NATO all the way to Ukraine. This is a project. This is not one administration or another. This is a US government project that started more than thirty years ago. In 1997, Zbigniew Brzezinski wrote The Grand Chessboard. That is not just musings of mister Brzynski. That is the presentation of the decisions of the United States government explained to the public, which is how these books work. And the book describes the eastward enlargement of Europe and of NATO as simultaneous events. And there's a good chapter in that book that says, what will Russia do as Europe and NATO expand eastward? And I knew Zbig Brozynski personally. He was very nice to me. I was advising Poland. He was a big help. He was a very nice and smart man, and he got everything wrong. So in 1997, he wrote in detail why Russia could do nothing but exceed to the eastward expansion of NATO and Europe. In fact, he says the eastward expansion of Europe, and not just Europe, but NATO. This was a plan, NATO. Speaker 0: Project. And he explains how Russia will never align Speaker 1: with China. Unthinkable. Russia will never align with Iran. Russia Russia has no vocation other than the European vocation. So as Europe moves east, there's nothing Russia can do about it. So says yet another American strategist. Is it any question why we're in war all the time? Question why we're in war all the time? Because one thing about America is we always know what our counterparts are going to do, and we always get it wrong. And one reason we always get it wrong is that in game theory that the American strategists play, you don't actually talk to the other side. You just know what the other side's strategy is. That's it's wonderful. It saves so much time. You don't need any diplomacy. So this project began, and we had a continuity of government for project. Why? Because America learned everything it knows from the British. And so we are the wannabe British Empire. And what the British Empire understood in 1853, mister Palmerston Lord Palmerston, excuse me, is that you surround Russia in the Black Sea, and you deny Russia access to the Eastern Mediterranean, and all you're watching is an American project to do that in the twenty first century. The idea was that there would be Ukraine, Romania, Bulgaria, Turkey, and Georgia as the Black Sea literal that would deprive literal deprive Speaker 0: Russia of any international status by blocking the Black Sea and essentially by neutralizing Russia Speaker 1: as more than a local power. Brzezinski is completely clear about this. And before Brzezinski, there was Mackinder, and who owns the island of the world owns the world. So this project goes back a long time. I think it goes back basically to Palmerston. In '19 and, again, I've lived through every administration. I've known these presidents. I've known their teams. Nothing changed much from Clinton to Bush to Obama to Trump won to Biden. Maybe they got worse step by step. Biden was the worst in my view. Maybe also because he was not compas mentis for the last couple of years. And I say that seriously, not as a snarky remark. The American political system is a system of image. It's a system of media manipulation every day. It is a PR system. And so you could have a president that basically doesn't function and have that in power for two years and actually have that president run for reelection. And one damn thing is he had to stand on a stage for ninety minutes by himself, and that was the end of it. Had it not been that mistake, he would have gone on to have his candidacy, whether he was sleeping after 4PM in the afternoon or not. So this is actually the reality. Everybody goes along with it. It's impolite to say anything that I'm saying, because we don't speak the truth about almost anything in this world right now. So this project went on from the 1990s. Bombing Belgrade's Seventy Eight Straight Days in 1999 was part of this project. Splitting apart the country when borders are sacrosanct, aren't they indeed? Except for Kosovo. That's fine. Because borders are sacrosanct except when America changes them. Sudan was another related project. The South Sudan rebellion. Did that just happen because South happen because South Sudanese rebelled? Or can I give you the CIA playbook? To please understand, as grown ups, what this is about. Powers. That doesn't come from local insurrections. South Sudan did not defeat North Sudan or Sudan in a Speaker 3: tribal Speaker 1: battle. It was a Speaker 3: tribal Speaker 1: battle. It was a U. S. Project. I would go often to Nairobi and meet U. S. Military or senators or others with deep interest in Sudan's politics. This was part of the game of unipolarity. So the NATO enlargement, as you know, started in 1999 with Hungary, Poland, and The Czech Republic, and Russia was extremely unhappy about it. But these were countries still far from the border, and Russia protested, but, of course, to no avail. Then George Bush junior came in. When nine eleven occurred, president Putin pledged all support. And then The US decided in 09/20/2001, that it would launch seven wars in five years. And you can listen to General Wesley Clark online talk about that. He was NATO's supreme commander in 1999. He went to the Pentagon on 09/20/2001. He was handed the paper explaining seven wars. These, by the way, were Netanyahu's wars. The idea was partly to clean up old Soviet allies and partly to take out supporters of Hamas and Hezbollah. Because Netanyahu's idea was there will be one state, thank you, only one state. It will be Israel. Israel will control all of the territory. And anyone that objects, we will overthrow. Not we, exactly, our friend, The United States. That's US policy until this morning. We don't know whether it will change. Now, the only wrinkle is that maybe The US will own Gaza instead of Israel owning Gaza. But the idea has been around at least for twenty five years. It actually goes back to document called Clean Break that Netanyahu and his American political team put together in 1996 to end the idea of the two state solution. You can also find it online. So these are projects, these are long term events, these aren't, is it Clinton, is it Bush, is it Obama? That's the boring way to look at American politics, as the day day to day game, but that's not what American politics is. So the next round of NATO enlargement came in 02/2004, with seven more countries. The three Baltic states: Romania, Bulgaria, Slovenia, and Slovakia. At this point, Russia was pretty damn upset. This was a complete violation of the postwar order agreed with German reunification. Essentially, was a fundamental trick or defection of The US from cooperative arrangement, is what it amounted to, because they believe in unipolarity. So as everybody recalls, because we just had the Munich Security Conference last week in 02/2007, president Putin said, stop. Enough. Enough. Stop now. And, of course, what that meant was in 02/2008, the United States jammed down Europe's throat enlargement of NATO to Ukraine and to Georgia. This is a long term project. I listened to Mr. Saakashvili in New York in February, and I walked out, called Sonia, and said, this man's crazy. And a month later, a war broke out because The United States told this guy, we save Georgia. And he stands at the Council on Foreign Relations, says Georgia's in the center of Europe. Well, it ain't, ladies and gentlemen. It's not in the center of Europe. And the most recent events are not helpful for Georgia, for its safety and your MPs going there, or MEPs going there, and European politicians. Gets Georgia destroyed. Doesn't save Georgia, that gets Georgia destroyed, completely destroyed. In 02/2008, as everybody knows, our former CIA director William Burns sent a long message back to Condoleezza Rice, niet means niet, about expansion. This we know from Julian Assange, because believe me, not one word is told to the American people about anything or to you or by any of your newspapers these days. So we have Julian Assange to thank, but we can read the memo in detail. As you know, Viktor Yanukovych was elected in 02/2010 on platform of neutrality. Russia had no territorial interests or designs in Ukraine at all. I know. I was there during these these years. What Russia was negotiating was a twenty five year lease to 2042 for Sevastopol Naval Base. That's it. Not for Crimea, not for the Donbas, nothing like that. This idea that Putin is reconstructing the Russian empire, this is childish propaganda. Excuse me. If anyone knows the day to day and year to year history, this is childish stuff. Childish stuff seems to work better than adult stuff. So no designs at all. The United States decided this man must be overthrown. United States decided this man must be overthrown. It's called a regime change operation. There have been about a hundred of them by The United States, many in your countries and many all over the world. That's what the CIA does for a living. K? Please know it. It's a very unusual kind of foreign policy. America, if you don't like the other side, you don't negotiate with them, you try to overthrow them, preferably covertly. If it doesn't work covertly, you do it overtly. You always say it's not our fault. They're the aggressor. They're the other side. They're Hitler. That comes up every two or three years, whether it's Saddam Hussein, whether it's Assad, whether it's Putin. That's very convenient. That's the only foreign policy explanation the American people are ever given anywhere. Well, we're facing Munich, Nineteen Thirty Eight. Well, we're facing Munich, Nineteen Thirty Eight. Can't talk to the other side. They're evil, implacable foes. That's the only model of foreign policy we ever hear from our mass media, and the mass media repeats it entirely because it's completely suborned by the US government. Now, in thousand fourteen, the US worked actively to overthrow Yanukovych. Everybody knows the phone call intercepted by my Columbia University colleague, Victoria Newland, and The US Ambassador, Peter Piatt. Speaker 4: Can't remember if I told you this or if I only told Washington this, that when I talked to Jeff Feltman this morning, he had a new name for the UN guy, Robert Seri. Did I write you that this morning? Speaker 2: Yeah. I saw that. Speaker 4: He he's now gotten both Seri and Ban Ki Moon to agree that Seri could come in Monday or Tuesday. Speaker 2: Okay. Speaker 4: So that would be great, I think, to help glue this thing and have the UN help glue it and, you know, fuck the EU. Speaker 2: No. Exactly. And I think we've got to do something to make it stick together because you can be pretty sure that if it does if it does start to gain altitude, the Russians will be working behind the scenes to try to torpedo it. Speaker 1: You don't get better evidence. The Russians intercepted her call, and they put it on the Internet. Listen to it. It's fascinating. I know all these people. By the way, by doing that, they all got promoted in the Biden administration. That's the job. Now when the Maidan occurred, I was called immediately, oh, Professor Sachs, the new Ukrainian prime minister would like to see you to talk about the economic crisis, because I'm pretty good at that. And so I flew to Kyiv, and I was walked around the Maidan. And I was told how The US paid the money for all the people around the Maidan. Spontaneous, revolution of dignity. Ladies and gentlemen, please, where do all these media outlets come from? Where does all this organization come from? Where do all these buses come from? Where do all these people called in come from? Are you kidding? This is organized effort. And it's not a secret except to citizens of Europe and The United States. Everyone else understands it quite clearly. Then came Minsk, and especially Minsk Two, which, by the way, was modeled on South Tyrolean autonomy. And the Belgians could have related to Mitzvah very well. It said there should be autonomy for the Russian speaking regions in the East Of Ukraine. It was supported unanimously by the UN Security Council. The United States and Ukraine decided it was not to be enforced. Germany and France, which were the guarantors of the Normandy process, let it go. And it was absolutely another direct American unipolar action with Europe as usual playing completely useless subsidiary role, even though it was a guarantor of the agreement. Trump won, raised raised the armaments. There were many thousands of deaths in the shelling by Ukraine in the Donbas. There was no Minsk Two agreement. And then Biden came into office. And, again, I know all these people. I used to be a member of the Democratic Party. I now am strictly sworn to be a member of no party, because both are the same anyway, and because this is I the Democrats became complete warmongers over time, and there not was not one one voice about peace, just like most of your parliamentarians, the same way. So at the end of 1991, Putin put on the table a last effort in two security agreement drafts, one with Europe and one with The United States. The US put on the table December 2021. I had an hour call with Jake Sullivan in the White House begging, Jake, avoid the war. You can avoid the war. All you have to do is say, NATO will not enlarge to Ukraine. And he said to me, oh, NATO's not gonna enlarge to Ukraine. Don't worry about it. I said, Jake, say it publicly. No. No. No. We can't say it publicly. I said, Jake, you're going to have a war over something that isn't even going to happen? He said, don't worry, Jeff, there'll be no war. These are not very bright people. I'm telling you, if I can give you my honest view, they're not very bright people. And I dealt with them for more than forty years. They talk to themselves. They don't talk to anybody else. They play game theory. In non cooperative game theory, you don't talk to the other side. You just make your strategy. This is the essence of game theory. It's not negotiation theory. It's not peacemaking theory. It is unilateral, non cooperative theory, if you know formal game theory. That's what they play. It started at the Rand Corporation. That's what they still play. In 2019, there's a paper by Rand, how do we extend Russia? Do you know they wrote a paper which Biden followed? How do we annoy Russia? That's literally the strategy. How do we annoy Russia? We're trying to provoke it, trying to make it break apart, maybe have regime change, maybe have unrest, maybe have economic crisis. That's what you call your ally. Are you kidding? So, I had a long and frustrating phone call with Sullivan. I was standing out in the freezing cold. I happened to be trying to have a ski day. And there I was, Jake, don't have the war. Oh, there'll be no war, Jeff. We know a lot of what happened the next month, which is that they refused to negotiate. The stupidest idea of NATO is the so called open door policy. Are you kidding? NATO reserves the right to go where it wants without any neighbor having any say whatsoever? Well, I tell the Mexicans and the Canadians, don't try it. You know, Trump may wanna take over Canada so Canada could say to China, why don't you build a military base in in in Ontario? I wouldn't advise it. And The United States would not say, Well, it's an open door. That's their business. I mean, they can do what they want. That's not our business. But grown ups in Europe repeat this. In Europe, in your commission, your high representative. This is nonsense stuff. This is not even baby geopolitics. This is just not thinking at all. So the war started. What was Putin's intention in the war? I can tell you what his intention was. It was to force Zelensky to negotiate neutrality. Neutrality. And that happened within seven days of the start of the invasion. You should understand this, not the propaganda that's written about this. Oh, that they failed failed and he was gonna take over Ukraine. Come on, ladies and gentlemen. Understand something basic. The idea was to keep NATO, and what is NATO? It's The United States, off of Russia's border. No more, no less. I should add one very important point. Why are they so interested? First, because if China or Russia decided to have a military base on the Rio Grande or in Canadian border, not only would The United States freak out, we'd have war within about ten minutes, but because The United States unilaterally abandoned the anti ballistic missile treaty in 02/2002 and ended the nuclear arms control framework by doing so. And this is extremely important to understand. The nuclear arms control framework is based on trying to block a first strike. The ABM treaty was a critical component of that. The US unilaterally walked out of the ABM treaty in 02/2002. It blew a Russian gasket. So everything I've been describing is in the context of the destruction of the nuclear framework as well. And starting in 02/2010, the US put in Aegis missile systems in Poland and then in Romania. And Russia doesn't like that. And one of the issues on the table in December and January, December '20 '20 '1, January '20 '20 '2, was does The United States claim the right to put missile systems in Ukraine? And Blinken told Lavrov in January 2022, the United States reserves the right to put middle sis missile systems wherever wherever it wants. That's your putative ally. And now let's put intermediate missile systems back in Germany. The United States walked out of the INF treaty unilaterally in 2019. There is no nuclear arms framework right now. None. When Zelensky said in seven days, let's negotiate, I know the details of this exquisitely because I've talked to all the parties in detail. Within a couple of weeks, there was a document exchanged that president Putin had approved, that Lavrov had presented, that was being managed by the Turkish mediators. I flew to Ankara to listen in detail to what the mediators were doing. Ukraine walked away unilaterally from a near agreement. Why? Because The United States told them to. Because the UK added icing to the cake by having Bojo go in early April to Ukraine and explain. And he has recently and if your security is in the hands of Boris Johnson, God help us all. Keith Starmer turns out to be even worse. It's unimaginable, but it is true. Boris Johnson has explained, and you can look it up on the website, that what's at stake here is Western hegemony. Not Ukraine, Western Hegemony. Western hegemony. Michael and I met at the Vatican with a group in the spring of twenty twenty two where we wrote a document explaining nothing nothing good can come out of this war for Ukraine. Negotiate now because anything that takes time will mean massive amounts of deaths, risk of nuclear escalation, and likely loss loss of the war. I wanna change one word from what we wrote then. Nothing was wrong in that document. And since that document, since The US talked talked the negotiators away from the table, about a million Ukrainians have died or been severely wounded. And the American senators who are as nasty and cynical and corrupt as imaginable say, this is wonderful expenditure of our money because no Americans are dying. It's the pure proxy war. One of our senators nearby me, Blumenthal, says this out loud. Mitt Romney says this out loud. It's best money America can spend. No Americans are dying. It's unreal. Now just to bring us up to yesterday. This failed. This project failed. Project failed. The idea of the project was that Russia would fold its hand. The idea all along was Russia can't resist, as Zbigniew Brzezinski explained in 1997. Americans thought we have the upper hand. We're gonna win because we're gonna bluff them. They're not really gonna fight. They're not really gonna mobilize. The nuclear option of cutting them out of swift, swift, that's going to do them in. The economic sanctions, that's going to do them in. The HIMARS, that's Speaker 3: going to Speaker 1: do them in. The the f sixteens. Honestly, I've listened to this for seventy years. I've listened to it as semi understanding, I'd say, for about fifty six years. They speak nonsense every day. My country, my government. This is so familiar to me, completely familiar. I begged the Ukrainians, and I had a track record with the Ukrainians. I advised Ukrainians. I'm not anti Ukrainian, pro Ukrainian completely. I said, save your lives, save your sovereignty, save your territory, be neutral. Don't listen to the Americans. I repeated to them the famous adage of Henry Kissinger that to be an enemy of The United States is dangerous, but to be a friend is fatal. Okay? So let me repeat that for Europe. To be an enemy of The United States is dangerous, but to be a friend is fatal. So let me now finalize a few words about Trump. Speaker 3: Trump Speaker 1: does not want the losing hand. This is why it is more likely than not this war will end, because Trump and president Putin will agree to end the war. If Europe does all its great great warmongering, it doesn't matter. The war is ending. So get it out of your system. Please tell your colleagues. It's over. And it's over because Trump doesn't morality. He doesn't wanna carry a loser. This is a loser. The one that will be saved by the negotiations taking place right now is Ukraine. Second Second is Europe. Your stock market's rising in recent days by the horrible news of negotiations. I know this has been met with the sheer horror in these chambers, but this is the best news that you could get. Now I encouraged. They don't listen to me, but I tried to reach out to some of the European leaders. Most don't wanna hear anything from me at all. But I said, don't go to Kyiv, go to Moscow, discuss with your counterparts. Are you kidding? You're Europe, you're Europe. You're four fifty million people. You're $20,000,000,000,000 economy. You should be the main economic trading partner of Russia. It's natural links. Natural links. By the way, if anyone would like to discuss how The US blew up Nord Stream, I'd be happy to talk about that. So the Trump administration is imperialist dominate the world. It is we will do what we want when we can. We will be better than a senescent Biden, Biden, and we'll cut our losses where we have to. There are several war zones in the world, The Middle East being another. We don't know what will happen with that. Again, if Europe had a proper policy, you could stop that war. I'll explain how. But war with China is also a possibility. So not saying that we're at the new age of peace, but we are in a very different kind of politics right now, and Europe should have a foreign policy. And not just a foreign policy of Russophobia, a foreign policy that is a realistic foreign policy that understands Russia's Europe's situation, that understands what America is and what it stands for, that tries to avoid Europe being invaded by The United States because it's not impossible that America will just land troops in Danish territory. I'm not joking, and I don't think they're joking. And Europe needs a foreign policy, a real one, not a, yes, we'll bargain with mister Trump and meet him halfway. You know what that will be like? Give me a call afterwards. Please don't have American officials as head of Europe. Have European officials. Please, have a European foreign policy. You're going to be living with Russia for a long time, so please negotiate with Russia. There are real security issues on the table. But the bombast and the Russophobia is not serving your security at all. It's not serving Ukraine's security at all. It contributed to a million casualties in Ukraine from this idiotic American adventure that you signed on to and then became the lead cheerleaders of. Solves nothing. On the Middle East, by the way, The US completely handed over foreign policy to Netanyahu thirty thirty years ago. The Israel lobby dominates American politics. Just have no doubt about it. I could explain for hours how it works. It's very dangerous. I'm hoping that Trump will not destroy his administration and worse, the Palestinian people because of Netanyahu, who I regard as a war criminal, properly indicted by the ICC, and that needs to be told no more, that there will be a state of Palestine on the borders of the 06/04/1967, according to international law, as the only way for peace. It's the only way for Europe to have peace on your borders with the Middle East is the two state solution. There is only one obstacle to it, by the way, and that is the veto of The United States and the UN Security Council. So if you wanna have some influence, tell The United States, drop the veto. You are together with a 80 countries in the world. The only ones that oppose a Palestinian state are The United States, Israel, Micronesia, Nauru, Polau, Papua New Guinea, Mr. Malay, and Paraguay. So this is a place where Europe could have a big influence. Europe has gone silent about the JCPOA and Iran. Greatest dream in life is a war between The United States and Iran. He's not given up, and it's not impossible that that would come also. And that's because The US, in this regard, does not have an independent foreign policy. It is run by Israel. It's tragic. It's amazing, by the way. And it could end. Trump may say that he wants foreign policy back, maybe. I'm hoping that it's the case. Finally, let me just say, with respect to China, China is not an enemy. China is just a success story. That's why it is viewed by The United States as an enemy, because China is a bigger economy than The United States. That's all. Speaker 3: Very well. Now questions. Please don't make any statements. Just make questions because we are too many, and we we don't have that all that much time. So where do I start? I start with on the left side. I have a preference to the left, as you know. You've come over. Yeah, go ahead. Speaker 5: Thank you, Jeffrey Sachs. From the Czech Republic, we are glad we have you here. We have a problem. We were cursed by a witch who told the EU and the EU is mocked. So it won't be improved until 02/1929. But what we, the Central Europeans, should do in the meantime, especially if the Germans doesn't don't happen to vote for Sara Waggenknecht enough. Are we supposed to create some kind of neutrality for the Central Europe, or what would you suggest us to do? Yeah. Speaker 1: So first of all, all my grandchildren are Czech, I want you to know. And Sonia is a Czech born and Czech citizen, so we're very proud. I'm the trailing spouse in this, but I'm a Czech wannabe. Europe needs to have a foreign policy that is a European foreign policy, and it needs to be a realist foreign policy. Realist is not hate. Realist is actually trying to understand both sides and to negotiate. There are two kinds of realists, a defensive realist and an offensive realist. My dear friend John Mearsheimer, who is the offensive realist, we're very close friends and I love him, but I believe more than he does, you talk to the other side and you find a way to make an understanding. And so, basically, Russia is not going to invade Europe. This is the fundamental point. It may get up to the deeper river. It's not going to invade Europe. But there are real issues. The main issue for Russia was The United States, because Russia, as a major power and the largest nuclear power in the world, was profoundly concerned about U. Profoundly concerned about U. S. Unipolarity from the beginning. Now that this is seemingly, possibly ending, Europe has to open negotiations directly with Russia as well, because The United States will quickly lose interest and you're going to be living with Russia for the next thousands of years. Okay? So what do you want? You want to make sure that the Baltic states are secure. The best thing for the Baltic States is to stop their Russophobia. This is the most important thing. Estonia has about 25% Russian citizens, Russian speaking citizens, ethnic Russians. Latvia, the same. Don't provoke the neighbor. That's all. This is not heard. It really isn't heard. And again, I want to explain my point of view. I have helped these countries, the ones I'm talking trying to advise I'm not their enemy, I'm not Putin's puppet, I'm not Putin's apologist. I worked in Estonia, they gave me, I don't, it's not, I think it's the second highest civilian honor that a president of Estonia can bestow on a non national, because I designed their currency system for them in 1992. So I'm giving them advice. Do not stand there, Estonia, and say, we want to break up Russia. Are you kidding? Don't. This is not how to survive in this world. You survive with mutual respect, respect, actually. You survive in negotiation. You survive in discussion. You don't outlaw the Russian language. Not a good idea when 25% of your population is has a first language of Russian. It's not right even if there weren't a giant on the border. It wouldn't be the right thing to do. You'd have it as an official language. You'd have a language of in lower school. You wouldn't antagonize the Russian Orthodox Church. So basically, we need to behave like grown ups. And when I constantly say that they're acting like children, Sonya always says to me that's unfair to children. Because this is worse than children. We have a six year old granddaughter and a three year old grandson, and they actually make up with their friends. And we don't tell them, go, just, just ridicule them tomorrow and every day. We say, go give them a hug and go play. And they do. This is not hard. By the way Well, anyway, I won't belabor the point. Thank you. Elect a new government. Shouldn't Speaker 3: say that. All Speaker 1: all I should say is change change policy. Speaker 3: I don't want to have a political leaning here. Yeah. Maybe a lady. Speaker 6: And Does that work? Yeah. Hi. My name is Kira. I'm a reporter with The Brussels Times. Thank you for the fascinating talk, Jeffrey. I just wanted to ask you about Trump's statements about wanting NATO members to increase their spending by 5%. And we're now seeing lots of countries scrambling to prove that they're going to do that, including Belgium. And given that Belgium is also the NATO headquarters, I wanted to ask you what would be the appropriate response to those statements by NATO members? Thanks. Speaker 1: Great. Thank you. We don't see exactly eye to eye on this question, so let give you my own view. My first recommendation, with all respect to Brussels, is move the NATO headquarters somewhere else. I mean it seriously, because one of the worst parts of European policy right now is a complete confusion of Europe and NATO. Policy right now is a complete confusion of Europe and NATO. These are completely different, but they became exactly the same. Europe is much better than NATO. In my opinion, NATO isn't even needed anymore. I would have ended it in 1991. But because The US viewed it as an instrument of hegemony, not as a defense against Russia. It continued afterwards. But the confusion of NATO and Europe is deadly, because expanding Europe meant expanding NATO. Period. And these should have been completely different things. So this is the first point. My own view, again, with all respect to Michael, we only had a brief conversation about it, is that Europe should have Europe basically should have its own foreign policy and its own military security, its own strategic autonomy, so called. And it should. I'm in favor of that. I would disband NATO, and maybe Trump is gonna do it anyway. Maybe Trump's gonna invade Greenland. Who knows? Then you're really gonna find out what NATO means. So I do think that Europe should invest in its security. 5% is outlandish, ridiculous, absurd, completely absurd. No one needs to spend anything like that amount. Two to 3% of GDP? Probably under the current circumstances. What I would do, by the way, is buy European production. Because actually, strangely, weirdly, unfortunately in this world, and it's a true truism, but it's unfortunate, so I'm not championing it, a lot of technological innovation spins off from the military sector, because governments invest in the military sector. So Trump is a arms salesman. You understand that. He's selling American arms. He is selling American technology. Vance told you a few days ago, don't even think about having your own AI technology. So please understand that this increase of spending is for The United States, not for you. And in this sense, I'm completely against that approach. But I would not be against an approach of Europe spending two to 3% of GDP for a unified European security structure and invested in Europe and European technology and not having The United States dictate the use of European technology. It's so interesting. It's The Netherlands that produces the only machines of advanced semiconductors, extreme ultraviolet lithography. It's ASML. But America determines every policy of ASML. The Netherlands doesn't even have a footnote. I wouldn't do that if I were you, hand over all security to The United States. I wouldn't do it. I would have your own security framework, so you can have your own foreign policy framework as well. Europe Europe stands for lots of things that The United States does not stand for. Europe stands for climate action, by the way, rightly so, because our president is completely bonkers on this. And Europe stands for decency, for social democracy, as an ethos I'm not talking about a party, I'm talking about an ethos of how equality of life occurs. Europe stands for multilateralism. Europe stands for the UN Charter. The US stands for none of those things. You know know that our secretary of state, Marco Rubio, canceled his trip to South Africa because on the agenda was equality and sustainability. And he said, I'm not getting into Egalitarianism is not a word of the American lexicon. Sustainable development, not at all. You probably know, by the way, that of the 93 UN member states, a 91 have had SDG plans presented as voluntary national reviews. A 91, two have not, Haiti and The United States Of America. The Biden administration wasn't even allowed to say sustainable development goals. The treasury had a policy not to say sustainable development goals. Okay. I mention all of this because you need your own foreign policy. I issue a report, two reports each year, one, the World Happiness Report, and 18 of the top 20 countries, if I remember correctly, are European. This is the highest quality of life in the whole world. So you need your own policy to protect that quality of life. The United States ranks way down. And the other report, where's my colleague Guillaume, he's somewhere in the room, here, there he is, Guillaume Lafortune is the lead author of our annual sustainable development report. And almost all of the top 20 countries are European countries, because you believe in this stuff. And that's why you're the happiest, except in geopolitics. Happiest, except in geopolitics. But quality of life. So you need your own foreign policy, but you won't have it unless you have your own security. You just won't. And so and by the way, 27 countries cannot each have their own foreign policy. This is a problem. You need a European foreign policy and a European security structure. And by the way, although Michael assures me it's dead, I was the greatest fan of OSCE and believed that OSCE is the proper framework for European security. It could really work. Speaker 3: Okay. And afterwards. First, yeah. You. Speaker 0: Thank you very much. Speaker 3: You are at the lunch. Now you can then. Speaker 0: Yeah. Yeah. Okay. Well, thank you, professor. I am from Slovakia, and my prime minister, Robert Fitsa, was almost shot dead because the opinions you had are the similar with him. Yes. We are, as a Slovakia, Slovak Government of the few countries in the European Union, we are talking to Russians. Two months ago, I was talking with mister Medvedev. In two weeks, I will be talking in Duma with mister Slutsky, who is the chairman of the Russian Foreign Affairs Committee in Moscow. Maybe my question is, what would you be your message to Russians in this moment? Because as I heard, they are on the victorious wave. They have no reason to not to conquer the Donbas because that's their war aim. And what can Trump can offer to them to stop the war immediately? What would be what would be the message for Russians from your side? Thank you very much. Speaker 1: Quickly because of this, and this will be at least one blessing in a very, very difficult time. Exactly what the settlement will be, I think, is now only a question of the territorial issues. And that is whether it is the complete four oblasts, including all of Herzon and Zaporizhzhia, or whether it is on the contact line, and how all of this will be negotiated. I'm not in the room of the negotiations, so I can't really say more. But the basis will be, there will be territorial concessions, neutrality, there will be security guarantees for Ukraine, for all parties, there will be, at least with The U. S, an end of the economic sanctions. But what counts, of course, is Europe and Russia. I think that there are and maybe there will be a restoration of nuclear arms negotiations, which would be extraordinarily positive. I think that there are tremendously important issues for Europe to negotiate directly with Russia. And so I would urge President Costa and the leadership of Europe to open direct discussions with President Putin, because European security is on the table. I know the Russian leaders, many of them quite well. They are good negotiators, and you should negotiate with them, and you should negotiate well with them. I would ask them some questions. I would ask them, what are the security guarantees that can work so that this war ends permanently? What are the security guarantees for the Baltic States? What should be done? Part of the process of negotiation is actually to ask the other side about your concerns, not just to know what they know as you think is too true, but actually to ask, we have a real problem, we have a real worry, what are the guarantees? Well, I want to know the answers also. By the way, I know Mr. Minister Lavrov, for thirty years, I regard him as a brilliant foreign minister. Talk with him, negotiate with him, get ideas, put ideas on the table, put counter ideas on the table. I don't think all of this can be settled by pure reason because of oneself. You settle wars by negotiating and understanding what are the real issues, and you don't call the other side a liar when they express their issues. You work out what the implications of that are for the mutual benefit of peace. So the most important thing is stop the yelling, stop the warmongering, and discuss with the Russian counterparts. And don't beg to be at the table with The United States. You don't need to be in the room with The United States. You're Europe. You should be in the room with Europe and Russia. If The United States wants to join, that's fine. But to beg, no. And by Europe does not need to have Ukraine in the room when Europe talks with Russia. You have a lot of issues, direct issues. Don't hand over your foreign policy to anybody, not to The United States, not to Ukraine, not to Israel. Keep a European foreign policy. This is the basic idea. Speaker 7: Hans Neuhof from the Southernists political group in this parliament, Alternative for Germany as political party. First of all, let me thank you, mister Sachs, for being here and sharing your ideas with us. And be assured that many of your ideas and of your colleague, John Mersheimer, have well been received by political groups here and have been integrated into our agenda. I widely share your views, yet there's one question regarding the historical account that you gave where I would like to go in some detail. This concerns the beginning of NATO expansion. You reported from the website what Gorbachev heard that there are many quotations from Genshir, for example, that NATO will not move one inch eastwards. Now the two plus four treaty has been signed in September 1990, right, in Moscow. So at that point in time the Warsaw Pact still existed and countries like Poland, Hungary and Czechia were not part of the negotiations for the True and For Treaty. So the Warsaw Pact actually dissolved in July 1991 and the Soviet Union dissolved in December 1991. So nobody who was present in the negotiations could speak for Poland, could speak for Hungary, could speak for Slovakia, that they would not try to become member of NATO once the overall situation has changed. So the counterargument, which we have to counter, is that it was on the will of these countries of Poland, of Hungary, of Slovakia that they wanted to join NATO because of the very history they had with the Soviet Union. And, of course, Russia was still perceived in a way as a follower of the Soviet Union. So how do you counter Speaker 3: that argument? Speaker 1: I have no doubt of why Hungary, Poland, Czech Republic, Slovakia wanted to join NATO. The question is, what is The US doing to make peace? Because NATO is not a choice of Hungary, Poland, Czech Republic, or Slovakia. NATO is a US led military alliance. And the question is, how are we going to establish peace in a reliable way? If I were making those decisions back then, I would have ended NATO altogether in 1991. When those countries requested NATO, I would have explained to them what our Defense Secretary William Perry said, what our lead statesman George Kennan said, what our lead statesman George Kennan said, what our final ambassador to the Soviet Union, Jack Matlock, said. They said, Well, we understand your feelings, but it's not a good idea because it could provoke provoke a new Cold War with Russia. So that's how I would have answered it. When those countries joined in the first wave, I don't think it was that consequential, in fact, except except that it was part of a bigger project. And the project was spelled out already in 1994. There's a very good book by Jonathan Haslam, Harvard University Press called Hubris, which gives a detailed historical documentation of step by step what happened. And it's really worth reading. So this is a Now, but the point I would really make is that Ukraine and Georgia were too far. This is right up against Russia. This is in the context of the complete destabilization of the nuclear framework. This is in the context of The US putting in missile systems on Russia's borders. If you listen to President Putin over the years, probably the main thing, if you listen carefully, that he's concerned about is missiles seven minutes from Moscow, is decapitation strike. And this is very real. The US not only would freak out, but did freak out when this happened in the Western Hemisphere. So it's the Cuban Missile Crisis in reverse. And fortunately, Nikita Khrushchev did not stand up and say, open door policy of the Warsaw Pact. We can go wherever we want. Cuba's asked us. It's none of America's business. What Khrushchev said is, war, my god, we don't want war. We end this crisis. We both pull back. That's what Khrushchev and Kennedy decided in the end. So this is the real consequential. Russia even swallowed with a lot of pain the Baltic States, Romania, Bulgaria, Slovakia, Slovenia. It is Ukraine and Georgia. And it's because of geography. It's because of Lord Palmerston. It's because of the first Crimean War. It's because of the missile systems that this is the essence of why there was this war. Speaker 3: Yeah. Is there anybody else? Because then we maybe close. What you want to be the last one? Oh, see. Which one? Oh, can you still continue? Sure. Yeah. No, you come for the lunch. I don't take it. Speaker 8: Thank you very much, professor Sachs, for coming. You've mentioned that the European Union needs to formulate its own foreign policy. In the past, the German Franco alliance was a big driver for those policies. Now with the Ukraine war, arguably, received a crack. Do you think that in the future, when the European Union is going formulate this new foreign policy, that they are going to be again in the front seat? Or should it be other countries or other blocks trying to make that change? Thank you very much. Speaker 1: Oh, it's hard. It's hard because, of course, of structure in which Europe can speak as Europe, even with some dissent, but with the European policy. I don't want to oversimplify how to get there exactly, but even with the structures you have, you could do a lot better with negotiating directly. The first rule is your diplomats should be diplomats, not secretaries of war. Honestly, that would go halfway, at least, to where you want to go. Diplomat is a very special kind of talent. A diplomat is trained to sit together with the other side and to listen, to shake hands, to smile, smile, and to be pleasant. It's very hard. It's a skill. It's training. It's a profession. It's not a game. You need that kind of diplomacy. I'm sorry. We are not hearing anything like that. I'll just make a couple complaints. First, Europe is not NATO, as I said. I thought Stoltenberg was the worst, but I was wrong. It just keeps getting worse. Could someone in NATO stop talking, for God's sake, about more war? And could NATO stop speaking for Europe and Europe stop thinking it's NATO? This is the first absolute point. Second, I'm sorry, but your high representative vice presidents need to become diplomats. Diplomacy means going to Moscow, inviting your Russian counterpart here, discussing this doesn't happen till now. So this is really my point. Now I believe that Europe should become more integrated and more unified in the years ahead. I'm a strong believer in subsidiarity, so we were discussing, I don't think housing policy is really Europe's main issue. I think this can be handled at the local level or at the national level. I don't see it as a European issue. But I don't see foreign policy as being a 27 country issue, I see it being as a European issue. And I see security being at a European level. So I think things need to be readjusted, but 'd like to see more Europe for truly European issues, and maybe less Europe for things that are properly subsidiary to Europe at the national and the local level. And I hope that such an evolution can take place. You know when the world talks about great powers right now, they talk about US, Russia, China, I include India, and I really want to include Europe, and I really want to include Africa as an African Union, and I want that to happen. But you'll notice on the list, Europe doesn't show up right now, and this is because there is no European foreign policy. Speaker 3: Okay. Maybe after you, one more, and then we when I close. Is there is there anybody who wanted I would prefer a woman actually if I'm I'm sorry. You you want no. First first this gentleman and then you close. Sorry for this one. It's a Speaker 9: you very much and thank you very much, professor, for this very courageous speech, very clear speech also that you made. I'm an MEP from Luxembourg. My question is the following, what are the long term consequences of this lost war? We lost the war, now we have an uncertain future for NATO. We have also clearly and to refer to it the marginalization of Europe. We have a strengthening of the BRICS countries which can be rivals in many respects. So will there be a future for a collective West over the next twenty or thirty years? Thank you very much. Speaker 1: I I don't believe there is a collective West. I believe that there is United States and Europe that are, in some areas, in parallel interest, and in many areas not in parallel interest. I want Europe to lead sustainable development, climate transformation, global decency. I believe if the world looked more like Europe, it'd be a happier, more peaceful, safer world. And longevity and better food, by the way. But just saying. In any event, Europe has a vocation that is rather different from the American tradition and, frankly, from the Anglo Saxon tradition, because it's been two hundred years of Anglo Saxon hegemony or aspirational hegemony, the British still believe they've run the world. It's amazing what nostalgia means. Stop. It's almost like a Monty Python skit, actually. But in any event, where was I? I'm thinking of Monty Python when the knight gets all his limbs cut off and says, everything's fine. I'm victorious. That's Britain, unfortunately. And so it's it's it's it's really terrible. So, no, I don't believe in the collective West. I don't believe in the global South. I don't believe in all these geographies don't even make sense because I'm actually you know, I look at maps a lot, and the global South is mostly in the North, and the West is not even West. And so I don't even understand what this is about. I do believe that we could be in a true age of abundance if we got our heads on straight. We're in the biggest technological advance in human history. It's truly amazing what can be done right now. You know, I marvel at the fact that somebody who knows no chemistry won the Nobel Peace Prize for chemistry, because he's very good at deep neural networks, a genius, Demis Hassabis. They figured out protein folding, that generations of biochemists spent their whole lives on, and now DeepMind figured out how to do it by the thousands of proteins. We have friends that spent their entire life on one protein, brilliant friends, and now what we can do. So if actually, and same with renewable energy, as everybody knows, the price has come down by more than two orders of magnitude, the costs, we could transform the planet, we could protect the climate system, we could protect biodiversity, we could ensure every child gets a good education, we could do so many wonderful things right now. And so what do we need to do that? In my view, we need peace, most importantly. And my basic point is there are no deep reasons for conflict anywhere, because every conflict I study is just a mistake. It's not we are not struggling for Lebensraum. That idea that came from Malthus and that became a Nazi idea was always a wrong idea. It was mistake, a fundamental intellectual mistake. An intellectual mistake, by the way, because leading scientists adopted the idea that we had race national wars, we had wars of survival, because we don't have enough on the planet. As an economist, I can tell you, we have plenty on the planet for everybody's development, plenty. We're not in a conflict with China. We're not in a conflict with Russia. If we calm down, if you ask about the long term, the long term is very good. Thank you. The long term, if we don't blow ourselves up, is very good. And so this is what we should aim for, a positive shared vision under international law. Because of our technology, things operate at a regional scale now. It used to be it was villages, then it was small areas, then it was unification of countries, now it's regional. That's not just because regions are wonderful. It's because the underlying technological reality, say Europe should be an integrated area by transport, by fast rail, by digital, by and so there's Europe. Politics follows the technological realities to a very important extent. We're in a world of regions now. So Europe should be Europe with subsidiarity. Don't lose all of the wonderful, wonderful national and local elements. But Europe should be Europe. So the good side is let's I want Europe to have diplomacy, for example, with ASEAN. I spend a of time with the ASEAN countries. If the the EU green deal, wonderful idea. I said many years ago, okay, to the ASEAN leaders, make an ASEAN Green Deal. And then talk with the Europeans so that you have this wonderful relationship, trade, investment, technology. So last year they announced an ASEAN Green Deal. What did Europe do about it? Nothing. It said, Sorry, we're in the Ukraine war. Thank you. No interest. So this is my point. Prospects are very positive if we construct the piece. Speaker 3: Yeah. Because we have to go, I get all the time messages that I should hear, leave the room. Short. So with something very short? Yeah. Speaker 10: Do you think that a way out of the conflict is some kind of style of felentization? And then, is that what you would have liked to see in Sweden and Finland's foreign policy as an example? Is that instead of them becoming members of NATO, is that the way that you would have liked to see these countries handed off foreign policy? And do you think that these countries that border Russia should just kind of succumb to their faith that, okay, we can't provoke Russia, like this is the way we have to live? Speaker 1: Yeah. Very good. Excellent question. And let me just report one part about Finlandization. Finlandization landed Finland number one in the World Happiness Report year after year. Rich, successful, happy, and secure. That's pre NATO. So Finlandization was a wonderful thing. Number one in the world. When Sweden and Finland and Austria were neutral. Bravo. Smart. When Ukraine was neutral. Smart. If you have two superpowers, keep them apart a little bit. You don't have to be right with your nose up against each other, especially if one of them, The US, is pushing its nose into the other one. And so Finlandization, to my mind, has a very positive connotation. So does Austrianization. Austria, nineteen fifty five, signed its neutrality. The Soviet Army left. And Austria is a wonderful place, by the way, absolutely wonderful. And so this is basic how to avoid conflict. If The United States had any sense at all, it would have left these countries space in between the US military and Russia. But that's where The US lost it. Speaker 3: Thank you very much. Let me I I just want to end with an appeal. I think we both agree that we will have a the war will end within a month or two, and that means the fighting will end. It doesn't mean that we will have peace in Europe. The peace in Europe, that has to be done by us, by Europeans, not by a president from The United States. We have to create this peace, and that is Europe, which includes, of course, Belarus, Russia, and all these other countries. So we have to do something, and we are here at parliament. We are as a parliamentarians, we represent people. We are the only legitimate democratically legitimate institution in the European Union. Maybe we should have become all a little bit more proactive in trying to move this peace process forwards across party lines. I think, I don't know how many parties here really are, but if we can talk to each other without saying, ah, you're from this party, you're from this party, I think we really have to concentrate. If here we could not take more initiative from the parliament vis a vis the commission and say, we are presenting the people, not you. We are presenting the people, and these people in Europe want peace, and that's what we should go. So maybe this the beginning of one. We will make every month, I will organize with my colleagues the same thing here about different topics, which we are all around it, and we hope that this one we get a discussion that is different than what we have in the where we basically don't have a discussion, but that we have a discussion also across the party and invite also people from other political parties. We don't invite anybody. Let's discuss it. In the end, we want all want this the same peace for the next generation, and I have plenty of children, grandchildren, you too, and that's what we need. Okay, thank you very much, professor Lin.
Saved - July 2, 2025 at 4:53 PM

@redpilldispensr - Red Pill Dispenser

Wait, what did Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla just tell the World Economic Forum? 😲 https://t.co/OQ4YFOIBI3

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims that an individual had a goal to reduce the world's population by fifty percent by 2023, and that this goal is becoming reality. They describe a biological chip within a tablet that, upon dissolving in the stomach, sends a signal confirming the tablet was taken. The speaker suggests this technology has applications for insurance companies to monitor patient compliance with medication.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Goals for the next five years. And one of them was by 2023, we will reduce the number of people in the world by fifty percent. I think today, his dream is becoming reality. It is basically biological ship that it is in the tablet and once you take the tablet and dissolves into your stomach, send a signal that you took the tablet. So imagine the applications of that compliance. The insurance companies to know that the medicines that patients should take, they do take them. It is fascinating what happens.
Saved - September 28, 2025 at 12:13 PM

@gregreese - Greg Reese

What the GENIUS ACT Will Soon Bring https://t.co/OffxdiyyVe

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker says Charlie Kirk's death is being used to attack freedom of speech, change in the US economy is coming. The US government faces a criminally irresponsible debt crisis; the world is losing faith in the dollar and disgusted with the crimes against humanity that the USD money printing machines are funding daily. Cutting spending didn't work; the Genius Act would require stablecoin companies to be backed by US debt to create increased demand for US debt and funnel money into US Government debt. Anton Kobyakov says the US is planning a worldwide crypto rug pull to erase its debt by creating a US debt-based stablecoin system, then devalue it, robbing the people of their money. The world is moving away from fiat money, dividing into zones; BRICS may not buy US debt; regulations push stablecoins offshore. Vietnam implements digital ID with biometric data; 86,000,000 bank accounts erased or frozen.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: While Charlie Kirk's death is being used by political agents to attack freedom of speech and to further divide an already divided nation, Many are wondering what happens next. And most financial analysts these days will tell you what's next. Radical change in The US economy is coming. The US government is facing a criminally irresponsible debt crisis. The world is losing faith in the dollar and growing more and more disgusted with the crimes against humanity that the USD money printing machines are funding every day. Cutting spending didn't work, and the next attempt to try and save The US debt based system can be found in the recent Genius Act. In short term investing, the volatility of Bitcoin can allow a person to profit immensely, but only if they have a stablecoin to convert to when the market corrects itself. This is the foundational purpose of a stablecoin, to maintain a stable value so that one's investment can be temporarily secured. The plan outlined in the Genius Act is to create an increased demand for US debt by requiring stablecoin companies to be backed by US debt, thereby using stablecoins as a way to funnel global money into US Government debt. President Putin's adviser, Anton Kobyakov, says that The US is planning a worldwide crypto rug pull to erase its massive debt by creating a US debt based stablecoin system, and then devalue it, robbing the people of their money to pay off its debt. Speaker 1: Right now, America is trying to change the rules in the gold and cryptocurrency markets. Remember how much debt they have? $35,000,000,000,000. The US, just as it did in the nineteen thirties and nineteen seventies, will solve its financial problems at the expense of the entire world, driving everyone where? Into the cryptocurrency cloud. Over time, when part of The US national debt is placed in stablecoins, The US will devalue that debt. Once again in simple terms, right now they have a $35,000,000,000,000 currency debt. They move it into crypto, into the cloud, devalue it, and start from scratch. Speaker 0: Of course, this is all just money out of thin air, a desperate monetary sleight of hand that doesn't create new wealth and only shows that the system has failed. To show that Russia and other countries will not go along with this, he also said that the world will split up into zones. Speaker 1: The world isn't just moving to a new type of financial system. The world is moving away from fiat money and dividing into zones. Speaker 0: This is referring to a multipolar world where different sets of rules are applied to different zones and signals the strong possibility that BRICS will not be buying US debt in the near future. It is important to remember that the term and the idea of BRICS was conceived in 2001 by an economist at Goldman Sachs. US regulations on stablecoins will likely push the market offshore where stablecoin issuers will turn to real world assets over US debt. The US will then have to manage the debt crisis by taxing the American people, most likely with a carbon tax system. Stablecoins have been predominantly used for investing, but they also have the ability to freeze and seize your money, which should please Trump supporters who have been giddy school girls over canceling people who offend them online. The future of technocratic banking control is already being deployed in Vietnam who recently implemented a nationwide digital ID system that requires both citizens and foreign residents to permit the government to store their biometric data in a centralized database. Participation is not optional, and all accounts without biometric data will be closed. The Vietnamese government has already erased and or frozen 86,000,000 bank accounts, and Vietnam is just the beta test. This is soon going worldwide. Greg Reese reporting. It can't happen here. The Reiss report is now fully funded by my Substack subscribers. Subscribe today and support my work at gregreiss.substack.com.
Saved - October 13, 2025 at 7:41 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I note the claim that Hunzas ate up to 200 apricot seeds daily for B17 (amygdalin), touted as nature’s strongest B17. For 50 years John Richardson Jr. and Judy Mikovits say hidden research proves natural defenses. Tomorrow, I’ll hear them in a 12 PM CDT Zoom masterclass; complimentary, 1,000 seats, replay 7 days. Reserve at https://ghi.ac/b17-oncogenx-masterclass. Blessings, Dr. Edward Group, DC

@dr_edwardgroup - Dr. Edward Group, DC

The 1974 book “World Without Cancer” documents how the indigenous Hunzas ate up to 200 apricot seeds a day. That’s because apricot seeds have the highest concentration of B17 found in nature. 🌱 Vitamin B17, also known as Amygdalin, is a naturally occurring chemical compound found in the seeds of plants such as apricots, bitter almonds, apples, peaches, cherries, and plums. But 50 years of research on the healing benefits of B17 has been suppressed. ⚠️ For decades, John Richardson Jr. has carried his father’s legacy forward, refining natural methods and proving what nature can do for the body’s defense systems. This is controversial. This is powerful. ‼️ And tomorrow, you’ll hear the truth directly from the pioneers who risked everything to protect and share it: 🔹 John Richardson Jr. – 50-year legacy of B17 research, now enhanced with cutting-edge MicroSomal delivery technology. 🔹 Dr. Judy Mikovits – 30 years of hidden cellular defense discoveries, including her breakthrough OncoGenX formula. This isn’t just another webinar. It’s a rare opportunity to sit at the feet of those who’ve kept these truths alive. 🚨 Tomorrow at 12 PM CDT — You Don’t Want to Miss This 🚨 📅 Tuesday, September 30th 🕛 12:00–2:00 PM CDT | Interactive Zoom 🎟 Complimentary (Replay available for 7 days) Seats are limited to 1,000. If you’re ready to hear what few have ever been allowed to share — this is your moment. 👉 Reserve your seat now: https://ghi.ac/b17-oncogenx-masterclass Blessings & 💛, Dr. Edward Group, DC #HealingCircle #CellularHealing #SuppressedScience #B17 #RonRichardsonJr #JudyMikovits #DrEdwardGroup #NaturalHealing #GlobalHealingInstitute #TruthSeeker #SelfHealing #DetoxYourBody #HealthFreedom #AwakenTheHealerWithin #HolisticHealing #CellularDefense

Video Transcript AI Summary
The reason we eat the apricot seed, the reason people do it is because it has the highest concentration found in nature. So there's approximately twenty milligrams in that little apricot seed. And if you go on Google and you say, you know, I'm gonna eat some apricot seeds, they'll say don't eat more than three because you could die of poisoning. At a trade show, if I'm presenting apricot seeds, I'll eat a 100, a 150 a day. It shows the Hunsas eating up to 200 apricot seeds a day and their wealth is all found out by apricot seeds. Now doctors in Mexico and doctors in the past that have been using it to treat people's immune system and remember, we're only treating your immune system.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The reason we eat the apricot seed, the reason people do it is because it has the highest concentration found in nature. So there's approximately twenty milligrams in that little apricot seed. And if you go on Google and you say, you know, I'm gonna eat some apricot seeds, they'll say don't eat more than three because you could die of poisoning. Yes. Now again, warning, warning, warning Will Robinson. At a trade show, if I'm presenting apricot seeds, I'll eat a 100, a 150 a day. The Hunsas who this book World Without Sea, we're cover that cover that up. World Without Sea was written by G. R. Griffin fifty years ago next year since fiftieth anniversary. It shows the Hunsas eating up to 200 apricot seeds a day and their wealth is all found out by apricot seeds. That's how they discover how wealthy they are. So on a given day I will typically eat 40 apricot seeds a day. That's my typical amount of apricot seeds. That's equivalent of eight hundred milligrams of B17. Now doctors in Mexico and doctors in the past that have been using it to treat people's immune system and remember, we're only treating your immune system. We're not treating the C word. We don't want to have anything to do with the C Very big deal given the right condition. Right. That if you eat the right nutrition your body can heal itself. It really is a situation where if you have the things that the disease is battling, you can keep it away. The the the automatic question that everybody asks is about cyanide because if you Google apricot seeds or amygdalin, you can you can hear that you will you could die of cyanide poison if you eat too many apricot seeds. Now I'm gonna tell you, this is very controversial, but that's not true. If I was killing people with apricot seeds, I wouldn't be able to do this anymore. My family's been in this business for fifty years, and we've been selling apricot seeds.
Saved - September 23, 2023 at 7:23 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The PfizerBioNTech vaccine trial raised concerns about the comparison between different manufacturing processes. Safety and efficacy data for the 250 subjects who received doses made with a new method remain unpublished. Variability in production processes and leftover bacterial DNA were also highlighted. Reports showed higher adverse events in placebo subjects after vaccination. The need to understand production process impact on vaccine efficacy and safety is emphasized. Furthermore, the use of distinct Pfizer lot numbers and variability in adverse events across different lots were observed. The importance of manufacturing standards and batch toxicity is also highlighted. The article provides links to further information and expert testimonies.

@joshg99 - Josh Guetzkow

Was the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine clinical trial a bait-and-switch? There were >44,000 people in the trial, but only ~250 of them were given doses made with a new manufacturing method ('process 2') that was used to make enough doses to sell around the world.

@joshg99 - Josh Guetzkow

To our knowledge, the safety and efficacy comparison they planned to do with those 250 subjects has never been published and has not been released in the FOIA'd documents that Pfizer submitted to the FDA. Was the comparison ever done? Where are the results?

@joshg99 - Josh Guetzkow

@RetsefL and I explore the importance of this comparison and the potential impact of variability in the the production process of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines on efficacy and safety in a newly published rapid response in the @bmj_latest. https://www.bmj.com/content/378/bmj.o1731/rr-2

Effect of mRNA Vaccine Manufacturing Processes on Efficacy and Safety Still an Open Question bmj.com

@joshg99 - Josh Guetzkow

Keep in mind that one of the major changes in the new production process was using bacterial cDNA to upscale production of mRNA. @Kevin_McKernan's analysis of vaccine vials found unacceptably high levels of leftover bacterial DNA. https://www.rebelnews.com/genomics_expert_discovers_concerning_contents_in_covid_vaccine_vials

Genomics expert discovers concerning contents in COVID vaccine vials Former research and development leader at the Human Genome Project has taken citizen science into his own hands to learn more about what exactly lurks in the vials of the novel COVID-19 injections. rebelnews.com

@joshg99 - Josh Guetzkow

Pfizer's 6-month report to the FDA doesn't include the process 2 comparison, but it does show a significantly higher serious adverse event rate in placebo subjects after they were given the vaccine compared to the original vaccine group, "as expected." Why was it expected?

@joshg99 - Josh Guetzkow

We know from FOIA'd documents that about 70% of the trial sites received new batches with distinct Pfizer lot numbers after Nov. 19. Were these intended for the crossover placebo subjects? Were they different than the doses given to the original treatment group? And if so, how?

@joshg99 - Josh Guetzkow

In addition, a recent Danish study found significant variability in the rate of serious adverse events across 52 different lots of Comirnaty. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eci.13998

@joshg99 - Josh Guetzkow

Taken together, evidence from trial documents and existing research underscores the need to better understand the potential impact of variability in the production process of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines on efficacy and safety.

@joshg99 - Josh Guetzkow

I forgot to add: The two process 2 lots sent to 8 trial sites were also given to the public. There are 1,149 reports in VAERS for these lots, including 307 serious adverse events and 23 deaths.

@joshg99 - Josh Guetzkow

This thread is also highly relevant to manufacturing standards and batch toxicity:

@Jikkyleaks - Jikkyleaks 🐭

HOLY CHEESE 🧀🧀🧀 I have discovered something that should lead to the immediate investigation of the TGA and every drug regulator Two FOIs prove that there were batches of #Pfizer vaccine that had killed people and should have failed the batch analysis. But they kept jabbing.

@joshg99 - Josh Guetzkow

Somebody asked if study C4591017 was the process 2 comparison trial: https://clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/trial/2021-005903-11/results It isn't though it does compare 5 (unidentified) lots & found a 2x rate of subjects experiencing at least one AE and AEs judged related to the vaccine in one lot & variation in SAEs.

@joshg99 - Josh Guetzkow

In case it isn't clear, the 2 production processes were radically different and yielded different quality products! You can't just test it on 250 people and say it's all the same. They could not be assumed to be bio-similar, like name-brand and generic.

@joshg99 - Josh Guetzkow

@joshg99 - Josh Guetzkow

My 30 min. discussion with Dr. Paul Thomas on the Pfizer/BioNTech COVID vaccine bait-and-switch is live! Starts 5:30. Second half of video is an interview of Paul about his book, The Vaccine-Friendly Plan & how his views have changed since he wrote it. https://rumble.com/v2sp3wa-bait-and-switch-with-josh-guetzkow.html

Bait-and-Switch With Josh Guetzkow Josh Guetzkow, this week’s guest, is an investigative journalist. In this episode of ‘With the Wind,’ he explains Pfizer’s BioNTech COVID vaccine clinical trial bait-and-switch scheme and its effects rumble.com

@joshg99 - Josh Guetzkow

Was the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine clinical trial a bait-and-switch? There were >44,000 people in the trial, but only ~250 of them were given doses made with a new manufacturing method ('process 2') that was used to make enough doses to sell around the world.

@joshg99 - Josh Guetzkow

@joshg99 - Josh Guetzkow

"No one could have given informed consent because the public were mislead." MP @ABridgen posed a question today in parliament about the Pfizer/BioNTech Comirnaty clinical trial "bait and switch" that @RetsefL and I highlighted in our recent BMJ rapid response. 1/4

Video Transcript AI Summary
Andrew Bridgeman raises concerns about the Pfizer COVID vaccine rollout, citing evidence from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. He claims that the vaccine used in the rollout was not the same as the one trialed on volunteers and approved for emergency use. Bridgeman suggests that if ministers were unaware of this, it could be considered a criminal act by the MHRA. He argues that the public was misled, leading to a discrepancy between Pfizer's data and the UK's yellow card data on adverse events. Bridgeman requests a statement from the government on this matter.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Andrew Bridgeman. Madam Deputy Speaker, evidence has now emerged from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem that the Pfizer COVID vaccine rollout across the world was not the same nor was it manufactured in the same way as the vaccine trialed on 44,000 volunteers and subsequently adequately given emergency use approval. If ministers were unaware of this, then potentially the MHRA has has committed a criminal act. Madam deputy speaker, no one could have given informed consent because the public were misled. And this also explains the huge difference between the Pfizer data and our own yellow card data with regard to adverse events. Can we have a statement from the government at their earliest convenience?

@joshg99 - Josh Guetzkow

This article has excellent coverage of this issue. It also points out the fact that the manufacturer was never required to test process 2 jabs on lab animals. Or at least we've never seen results of such tests. https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/how-hancock-and-the-fiercely-independent-mhra-helped-pfizer-game-the-vaccine-approval-process/

How Hancock and the ‘fiercely independent’ MHRA recklessly rolled out a vaccine tested on only 500 people - The Conservative Woman How Hancock and the ‘fiercely independent’ MHRA recklessly rolled out a vaccine tested on only 500 people conservativewoman.co.uk

@joshg99 - Josh Guetzkow

Genomics expert, professor @P_J_Buckhaults U of South Carolina, testifies on the potential risks of the DNA contamination he found in vials of mRNA vaccine entirely that was entirely due to the switch to process 2. https://x.com/TheChiefNerd/status/1703544942004478251

Chief Nerd on X 🚨 MUST WATCH: Cancer Genomics Expert Dr. Phillip Buckhaults Testifies to the SC Senate on the DNA Contamination Found in mRNA COVID Vaccines "The Pfizer vaccine is contaminated with plasmid DNA, it's not just mRNA...I'm kind of alarmed about the possible consequences of… twitter.com

@joshg99 - Josh Guetzkow

However I suspect that the endotoxin contamination is likely a bigger problem, both because it is probably a major factor in many adverse events and because it is basically impossible to purify. For more on endotoxin risks: https://geoffpain.substack.com/

Geoff Pain PhD | GeoffPainPhD | Substack Tromethamine aka Tris, THAM and many other names is biologically active. Click to read Geoff Pain PhD, by GeoffPainPhD, a Substack publication with thousands of subscribers. geoffpain.substack.com

@joshg99 - Josh Guetzkow

See this thread for a further update showing that Pfizer/BioNTech never did the planned study comparing process 2 v 1 for safety and immunogenicity: https://x.com/joshg99/status/1705177305499279525

Josh Guetzkow on X Remember how the COVID vaccines contaminated with endotoxin & plasmid DNA that Pfizer/BioNTech sold to the world were only tested on 252 people, but they said they'd compare them w/the ~20K subjects who got higher quality ones? New FOIA proves they never did that! But I did.🧵 twitter.com

@joshg99 - Josh Guetzkow

A professor and expert in cancer genetics at U of South Carolina testifies on risks posed by process 2 jabs due to the plasmid DNA contamination: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IEWHhrHiiTY

@joshg99 - Josh Guetzkow

And a transcript of his interview with Maryanne Demasi: https://maryannedemasi.substack.com/p/exclusive-an-interview-with-buckhaults

EXCLUSIVE: An interview with Buckhaults about DNA contamination in covid vaccines... and the FDA responds Earlier this year, genomics expert Kevin McKernan first discovered DNA contamination in vials of Pfizer and Moderna’s bivalent booster shots. He published his findings in a pre-print, but the research received little attention from the mainstream media. maryannedemasi.substack.com
View Full Interactive Feed