reSee.it - Related Post Feed

listen_2learn
Posted - November 8, 2022 at 3:57 PM
Saved - December 25, 2023 at 10:15 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A thread shares clips from a conference discussing alleged rigging in the 2016 election. The author suggests that the experts involved may have influenced the 2020 election as well. Another post criticizes Hillary Clinton for denying election results and promoting conspiracy theories.

@listen_2learn - The Researcher

Thread with clips from a conference on how the 2016 election was rigged. How would you hack a presidential election? I’m guessing these partisan election experts had a hand in the 2020 election because they disappeared afterwards, but they will soon be back. https://t.co/pDHfioOBV8

Video Transcript AI Summary
To hack a US presidential election, the speaker suggests a four-step plan. First, use pre-election polls to identify closely contested states. Second, target large counties or their service providers and compromise their election management system computers. Third, infect individual voting machines using the compromised system. This can be done easily by purchasing a government surplus machine on Ebay. Finally, manipulate the votes on the computer, knowing that most states discard the paper ballots without checking them.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: How would you actually hack a US presidential election? Well, step 1, before the election, use pre election polls like Nate Silver provides to identify the states that are likely to be closest, that are going to be within a percent or so. Step 2, target some large counties or their service providers and compromise their election management system computers. I'll leave it as an exercise to the attacker to find out, how to compromise the election management system by, say, starting by emailing Sue. Step 3, use the compromised election management system to spread your infection to the individual voting machines. Developing an attack for one of these machines is not terribly difficult. I and others have done it again and again in the laboratory. All you need to do is buy 1 government surplus on Ebay to test it out. Finally, step 4, you're a tax steals votes on the computer, but no one ever looks at the paper because as we'll show you, most states just throw away that paper without ever looking at it.

@listen_2learn - The Researcher

By December 13, 2016, if there was fraud, it had to be exposed by this date in order to have any hope of changing the outcome of the election. Hillary Clinton. Election denier and conspiracy theorist. https://t.co/ZAna9mQC0s

Video Transcript AI Summary
In 2016, it was known that hacking could occur during the presidential election. The election results were surprisingly close compared to the polls, indicating possible interference. However, no US states examined enough paper ballots to determine if the computers were hacked. This revealed a significant gap in our system. With a deadline approaching for states to finalize their electoral college votes, there was a need to expose any fraud that may have occurred. Election integrity advocates struggled to find a solution to ensure the examination of physical evidence that could detect cyber attacks.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So coming back to 2016 and the presidential election, we knew on November on November 8th, excuse me, not December 8th, on November 8th, on Election Day, that hacking was possible, and at the end of the day when the election results came in, we saw that the result was extremely close, was surprising compared to the polling. We knew at that point that there had been cyberattacks of an unprecedented nature in American politics aimed previously at interfering with the election. This was all before Election Day, and we knew that it was feasible for an attacker to change votes on enough machines to have stolen the election result. Shockingly, at least shockingly to me and many other people, even under these circumstances, approximately 0 US states we're going to look at enough paper ballots to know whether the computers had been hacked. This is a major gap in our system. I previously had believed that the paper would provide a fairly strong deterrent, but if even in 2016 we're not going to look at any of the paper, well, it might as well not be there. So at this point, there were 5 weeks between Election Day on November 8th and December 13th, which is a deadline under federal law for states to lock in their electoral college votes, if there was no, if there was fraud that had taken place, it had to be exposed by this date in order to have any hope of changing the outcome of the election. So what to do under these circumstances? I and other election integrity advocates got together and started discussing some possibilities, but we didn't really have a good solution. Was there any way possible to make the states actually examine the physical evidence they had in a way that could potentially detect a cyber attack.
listen_2learn
Posted - November 8, 2022 at 6:47 PM
Saved - December 25, 2023 at 10:15 PM

@listen_2learn - The Researcher

Hillary was concerned about backpedaling about not accepting the results of the election. It could be a political problem. https://t.co/TIbDQPMm9q

Video Transcript AI Summary
The concern was that backpedaling from conceding the victory to Donald Trump would be seen as a threat to democracy. During the 2016 presidential debate, Trump's refusal to say he would accept the election results was considered horrifying by Clinton. There were two possible interpretations: either he wouldn't accept the result when settled, or he wanted to examine the evidence to ensure it wasn't rigged. Clinton took a firm stance that not accepting the election result immediately was a threat to democracy, so any deviation from that would have been a political problem.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But maybe most important and most aggravating was they were concerned about backpedaling from the concession, about tiptoeing away from having conceded the victory to Donald Trump. And for Clinton in 2016, this was a particular concern because there was this famous incident during the 3rd presidential debate where Trump refused to say, yes, he would accept the election results. And Clinton reacted to this by saying that's something truly horrifying. It's a direct threat to our democracy. Well, there are 2 things he could have meant. Right? One was he wouldn't accept the result when settled, right, that he he wouldn't concede power to the victor. That is truly horrifying. But the other, which is kind of a rational thing, is, well, I don't want to accept the results until all the evidence is examined to make sure it wasn't rigged. Well, she was committed to a position that not accepting the election result immediately was a threat to democracy. And so any kind of tiptoeing away from that would have been a political problem.
dom_lucre
Posted - April 11, 2023 at 12:13 AM
Saved - April 11, 2023 at 12:38 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Both Democrats and Republicans have a history of denying election results. In 2020, 77% of Republicans believed there was widespread fraud, while in 2016, 78% of Democrats believed the election was stolen. Stacey Abrams claimed voter suppression in her 2018 Georgia gubernatorial race, and Al Gore claimed he would have won in 2000 if all votes were counted. Democrats boycotted Trump's inauguration in 2016, and Rob Reiner funded a group to control media coverage of the Russia conspiracy. Both parties have denied elections for decades.

@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

THREAD Proof that AOC was right about Republicans denying the 2020 Presidential Election.

@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

On December 10, 2020 a Quinnipiac poll reported that “77% of Republicans said they believe there was widespread fraud in the 2020 election. On August 20, 2018 Gallup poll stated 78% of Democrats said the 2016 presidential election was "stolen." So, which party denies the most?

@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

In 2018, Democrat Stacey Abrams claimed she lost her Georgia gubernatorial race due to voter "suppression." She refused to concede. 3 years later, she told CNN that her opponent "won under the rules of the game at the time, but the game was rigged against the voters of Georgia.

Video Transcript AI Summary
This election has tested our faith. Some have tried to take our voices away, scare us, and distract us. But if we stay focused, we can see the finish line. You have inspired me every day during this campaign. I know the sacrifices you made to vote and volunteer. You put your faith in me, and tonight, I want you to know that the feeling is mutual. Look around, and you'll see that when we trust the people of Georgia, we can achieve anything together. Georgia still has a decision to make between division and trickery or leadership that defends our rights, our children, our careers, our communities, and our right to vote. To all Georgia voters, including those who haven't shown up before, welcome aboard. If I wasn't your first choice or if you made no choice at all, you'll have a chance to do a do-over.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This election has tested our faith. Yeah. I'm not gonna name names, but some have worked hard to take our voices away. To scare us away, to distract us. But if our vision is clear and we see the finish line. You you have inspired me every single day of this campaign. I know what you sacrificed to make your way to the polls, to volunteer after work or on lunch breaks. And I know that you put your faith in me. You'll do it again. Georgia, you put your faith in me. But I want you to know tonight, the feeling is mutual. And I want you to look around. Tonight should be all the proof you need that when we put our faith in the great people of the state, There is nothing we can't accomplish together. This this This fundamental truth is why we fight on, because Georgia still has a decision to make. A decision between division and trickery, Or a leadership that defends your rights, your kids, your career, your community, and your right to vote in America. That's what's on the ballot. Now, to all of Georgia's voters, including the 1,200,000 Who haven't shown up before, welcome aboard. But I wanna say this, if I wasn't your first choice Or if you made no choice at all, you're gonna have a chance to do a do over.

@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

On November 15, 2002, Washington Post interviewed former Vice President Al Gore about his election versus Bush he said, "I believe that if everyone in Florida who tried to vote had had his or her vote counted properly, that I would have won." This is denial by definition.

@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

On January 6, 2001 several House Democrats voted against certifying the election results of 2000. Rep. Maxine Waters, D-Calif., said in a joint session: "The objection is in writing, and I do not care that it is not signed by a member of the Senate. @RepMaxineWaters comments?

Video Transcript AI Summary
Miss Waters from California rises to object to the fraudulent 25 Florida electoral votes. The objection is in writing but not signed by a senator. The chair advises that the rules require a senator's signature. Miss Waters mentions gross violations of the voting rights act in Florida but acknowledges that the objection is not signed by a senator. The chair thanks Miss Waters but states that the point of order may not be received.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: For what purpose, does the gentlewoman from California, miss Waters, arise? Speaker 1: Mister vice president, I rise to object to the fraudulent 25 Florida electoral votes. Speaker 0: Is the objection, in writing and signed by a member of the house and a senator? Speaker 1: The objection is in writing, and I don't care that it is not it is not signed by a member of the senate. Speaker 0: The, the chair will advise that the rules do care, And, the the signature of the senator, Speaker 1: The Speaker 0: the signature of a senator is required, the chair will again, put that part of the question. Is the objection assigned by a senator? Speaker 1: Mister vice president, there are gross violations of the voting rights act From Florida? Speaker 0: The Speaker 1: gentleman and it is not signed by a senator. Speaker 0: The chair thanks the gentleman from California on the Base has previously stated the point of order may not be received.

@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

If John Kerry won Ohio in 2004 he would have become president. President George W. Bush carried it 51% to 49%, a margin of about 100,000 votes. But Jan. 6 Committee Chairman Bennie Thompson, D-Miss., on Jan. 6, 2005, joined 30 other House Democrats in refusing to certify Ohio.

@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

Former President Jimmy Carter said in 2019: "I think a full investigation would show that Trump didn't actually win the election in 2016. He lost the election, and he was put into office because the Russians interfered on his behalf." Why were Democrat politicians able to speak?

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker asserts that the Russians interfered in the 2016 election, suggesting that a full investigation would reveal Trump's illegitimacy as president. They claim that Trump lost the election and was only placed in office due to Russian interference. The speaker then asks if the listener believes Trump is an illegitimate president based on their statement, which they cannot retract.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There's no doubt that the Russians did interfere in the election, and I think the interference, although not yet quantified, if fully investigated, would show that Trump didn't actually win the election in 2016. He lost the election, and he was put in the office because the Russians interfere on his behalf. So do you believe president Trump is an illegitimate president? Based on what I just said, which I can't retract.

@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

Now the 2016 election, former Obama Secretary of Homeland Security Jeh Johnson testified under oath that, while the Russians tried to manipulate voting machines, there is no evidence that a single vote tally was changed. Have Republicans like @KariLake gotten this support?

@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

If a political party feels their voting system has flaws they have the right to be heard, the problem is that millions of dollars were spent denying the 2016 election in unison with Liberal Media and Politicians, Conservatives were banned for being vocal about the same concerns.

@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

In 2022 YouTubers began announcing that their channels were being banned for simply covering the 2016 election Democrat denial. Why are the largest platforms on the internet able to push their ideas but ban conservatives with no backing, is this truly fair?

@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

How is it possible that a conservative is eligible for de-platforming if they question the 2020 election when Democrats denied the 2016 election and set riots after the win? We can see very reputable sources and notable people that clearly state the election was stolen.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers discuss the legitimacy of the 2016 election, with some claiming it was stolen and others mentioning Russian interference. They emphasize that Russia hacked the election and express concerns about an illegitimate president. There are references to protests and violence following Trump's victory. The speakers question the validity of the election and express anger towards Trump. They mention petitions and calls to overturn the results. Overall, the transcript highlights the controversy surrounding the 2016 election and the division it caused.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So if we're all in agreement that it is incorrect to say the 2020 election was stolen, what about the 2016 election? Speaker 1: Look. I'm not gonna Go back into history. It was a stolen election. It was stolen. Speaker 2: Stolen. He's an illegitimate A president. He's an illegitimate president. You know, pretending to be president. Speaker 3: Why do you think the president is going to such great lengths to essentially Prove that Speaker 4: he beat you because he didn't. Speaker 1: 1 third of Clinton's supporters say Trump election is not legitimate. I make you the legitimate president that didn't really win. Speaker 2: You are absolutely right. You can run the best campaign. You can even become the nominee, and you can have The election stolen from you. Speaker 1: The 2016 election was stolen. Got a nicer way to say that. Speaker 2: Say Russia hacked the election. Speaker 1: Russia hacked our election. Speaker 2: Russia hacked our election. A little louder, please. Russia hacked our Our election. That was a 9 11 scale event. This was a kind of cyber 9 11 American institution. Yes. Speaker 1: Russia hacked our election. Speaker 5: Russia, you know, of course, After our election here Speaker 1: Half of Clinton's voters believe the conspiracy theory that Russia hacked election day votes. Speaker 2: We know that they were We're into voting rolls. Actual interference with the elections themselves. We know it happened. Speaker 1: Despite no Credible evidence. 67% of Democrats believe Russia tampered with vote tallies. Speaker 2: Hacking the US election. Hacking the US election. Russia hacked our elections. The Russians hacked our election. Speaker 1: Russia hacked our election. Russia hacked Speaker 4: our election. Speaker 2: Russian hacking of our election. Hacking of our of our election. Russia hacked our election. Russia hacked Act our election Speaker 1: A stolen election. Speaker 4: Russia hacked our election. Speaker 2: Russia hacked our election. Speaker 4: Universal assessment that Russia hacked our election in twenty Foreign governments. Act our elections. Speaker 1: Most young Americans consider Donald Trump an illegitimate president. Illegitimate president. He's an illegitimate president. Speaker 2: Why is he is illegitimate. He just won an election. Speaker 5: He is an illegitimate president in my mind. Speaker 1: That's it. I Absolutely agreed. Experts urge Clinton Kemp to challenge election results. Speaker 2: We will see how illegitimate his victory actually was. He's an illegitimate president. So then Russia hacked our election. Russians hacking our election. Hacked our election. Russia hacking our election. Speaker 1: I don't see this president elect has a legitimate president. Trump is an Legitimate president who stole the election. Speaker 2: He is not a president. Speaker 5: He's illegitimate. And my biggest fear is that he's gonna do it again with the help of Vlad. His best past, Terrifying. Speaker 1: Would you be my vice presidential candidate? Hillary Clinton voters called to overturn election results. Speaker 3: More than 4,000,000 people have already signed A petition on change .org. Calling for the electors of the electoral college to, quote, ignore their states, votes, and cast their ballots for secretary Speaker 1: Clinton Trump didn't actually win the election in 2016. We are the victims of a bloodless coup. She didn't won the general election. Yo. Electoral College. Make Hillary Clinton president, period. Speaker 2: Donald Trump is an illegitimate president. Unlegitimate president. Speaker 1: Fence don't accept Trump as a legitimate president. Speaker 2: Wasn't on the level. This election was not on the level. Speaker 1: I don't think he's a legitimate president. Our election wasn't Speaker 2: legit. He got his victory from cheating. Speaker 1: Yes. Trump cheated. Trump cheated Speaker 2: the 2016 election He's an illegitimate president. No validity. No credibility. Mhmm. And because of that Speaker 1: anger at what some see as an illegitimate president. Donald Trump has got to vote. It will not be Speaker 2: a peaceful change of power. Speaker 4: A number of incidents turned violent. Protesters Earl trash cans, flash bombs, and objects at police. Speaker 1: Several officers injured. Protesters blew rocks and smashed windows, leading to more confrontations, Injuries and arrests. Stop. The chaotic scene just blocks outside the secure area of the inauguration. Speaker 0: If denying election results It's extreme now. Yeah. Speaker 1: Why was it Let's let's Speaker 2: be really clear. That comparison that you made is just ridiculous. Protests against Donald Trump's election victory surged overnight, and some became violent. Violence erupted on the streets of Portland During the 2nd straight day of protests over the election of Donald Trump, some protesters launched fireworks and other projectiles at police. Several people began vandalizing cars. The card Speaker 4: Some demonstrators smashed door windows. Protesters faced off with police in other cities too, including Oakland, Denver, and Minneapolis. Speaker 6: Violent protests Continuing now for the 3rd day in a row, some 4,000 angry demonstrators over Trump's election victory taking to the streets. Speaker 4: Officers in front Thousands of protesters in what police called a riot. Speaker 6: Setting fires, taking their frustrations out on cars and buildings. People threw projectiles at officers and damaged property as well. Speaker 1: I do a trash can't happen because I'm angry. Speaker 2: 1 woman driving through was attacked as someone used a bat to smash her windshield. They are undermining our democratic process, everything that we stand for.

@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

It is very important to note that Republicans had both members of the House and Senate object the 2020 election, something that Democrats did not have in 2016 and during the 2001 election. If the ‘Insurrection’ never happened what would have been the result of the objections?

@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

On March 22, 2019, it was revealed that Rob Reiner, a man who might be the most consistent critic of Donald Trump, is funding the Democracy Integrity Project (TDIP) with billionaire liberal investor, George Soros. - Click the ALT button on all photos in this THREAD for more info

@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

TDIP is cloaked in mystery but more than a dozen interviews and determined that the group is implementing a comprehensive media-influence effort that included driving and controlling daily coverage of the Russia conspiracy. Why was this much money spent if it was true?

@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

On July 25, 2016, Election Justice USA released a 100 page report compiling evidence of massive election fraud during the 2016 Democratic primaries. Election Justice USA, a non-partisan organization. Essentially, EJUSA concluded that Hillary Clinton stole Bernie Sanders election.

@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

After President Trump’s victory in 2016, Over 70 Democrats boycotted his inauguration, with many “claiming his election was illegitimate.” Why did they support Hillary Clinton when Bernie Sanders supporters accused her of stealing his election? Where is the middle ground?

@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

Democrats have been denying elections for decades, every comment in this video is linked to its original source, we can only be in denial for so long until we pay the price for ignorance. Please Fact-Check the links in this video immediately: DNC Links: https://americafirstreport.com/here-are-so-many-examples-of-democrats-denying-election-results-that-your-head-will-spin/ https://americafirstreport.com/here-are-so-many-examples-of-democrats-denying-election-results-that-your-head-will-spin/

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: Let's get started. Light is solid, tough like a child. We're driving through the city, cruising in our cars. My steps are confident as I walk.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hot damn hole, here we go again. Light is a rock, hard as a kid. This is not for blocks through hardtops in the parking lot. Where my feet rock like this walking
Here Are So Many Examples of Democrats Denying Election Results That Your Head Will Spin The Republican National Committee is a strange beast sometimes. On one hand, they've essentially disavowed all discussions about the stolen americafirstreport.com

@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

The truth is, I would need 3 threads to cover about half the amount of election denying that Democrats have accomplished in the past decades. I will close with this 12- Minute video displaying Democrats denying the 2000, 2004, and 2016 Elections. I am only here to make you think.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers in the video discuss the idea of illegitimate presidents and stolen elections. They mention Russian interference in the 2016 election and express doubts about the legitimacy of President Trump's victory. They also bring up the 2000 and 2004 elections, claiming that Al Gore and John Kerry were the rightful winners. The speakers highlight concerns about voter suppression, electronic voting machines, and the lack of transparency in the electoral process. They argue that elections have been stolen through tactics such as voter ID laws and voter purging. Overall, they question the fairness and integrity of various elections and express the belief that some candidates were deprived of their rightful victories.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You can Speaker 1: run the best campaign. You can even become the nominee, and you can have the election stolen Speaker 2: from you. Speaker 3: How can you win with Russian interference, though? Speaker 4: That's a real thing. By Speaker 0: in 2020. But rightly. Speaker 3: Because I'm thinking an illegitimate president that didn't really win. So how do you, you know, fight against that in 2020? Speaker 0: You are absolutely right. Speaker 5: He's an illegitimate president in by mine. Speaker 6: Would you be my vice president for a candidate, brother? Folks, look, I absolutely agree. Speaker 7: Trump didn't actually win the election in 2016. He lost And he was put in the office because of the Russians in affair. Speaker 1: Trump knows he's an illegitimate president. Speaker 8: The president elect, although legally elected, is not legitimate. Speaker 2: I don't see this President-elect as a legitimate president. Speaker 9: You said you believe that Russia's interference altered through the outcome of the election. Speaker 10: I do. We have a president who, if in fact, it is proven, has been assisted by the Russians and may in fact not be a legitimate president. Speaker 1: The one thing that Trump is fearful of, when it comes to his being president, is that finally, we We will see how illegitimate his victory actually was. Speaker 2: I have an objection. Speaker 10: I object to the 15 votes from the state of North Carolina. I object because people are horrified. Speaker 1: He's an illegitimate president. Speaker 11: Do you believe Trump is a legitimate president? Speaker 4: What I believe is that there's no question that the outcome of this Finn was affected by the Russian interference. Speaker 12: There absolutely is a cloud of illegitimacy. Speaker 8: So that legitimacy is in question. Yes. So that was a very tainted election, and and in that Since it it's illegitimate. Speaker 11: Why do you think the president is going to such great lengths to essentially prove that he beat you? Speaker 1: Because he knows he didn't. He knows he's an illegitimate president. Speaker 9: Stolen emails. Stolen drone. Stolen drone. Stolen election. Welcome to the world of unprecedented Trump. So do you believe president Trump is an illegitimate president? Speaker 7: Based on what I just said, which I can't retract. Speaker 8: The Russian attempt to to have the election. And, frankly, the FBI's weighing in on the election. I think make the make makes this election illegitimate. Speaker 1: There was a widespread understanding that this election was not on the level. We still don't know what really happened, Isaac. I mean, there's just a lot that I think will be revealed. History will discover, but you don't win by 3,000,000 votes and have all this other shenanigan stuff going on and not come away with an idea like, Woah. Something's not right here. Speaker 4: The outcome of the election was affected by their interference. And now we need to know, you know, to what degree, if any, the Trump campaign was actually in Collusion with the with Russia. Speaker 1: He knows he's an illegitimate president, so, of course, he's obsessed with me. And I believe that it's a guilty conscience. Speaker 2: We actually won the last presidential election, folks. They stole the last presidential election. Speaker 6: If Al Gore won that election, I think he won anyway. Speaker 2: Actually, I think I carried for it. Speaker 1: Bush versus Gore. A court took away a presidency. Speaker 13: If all the votes were counted in Florida, then Al Gore would be president today and George Bush would be backing Speaker 0: I come from Florida, where you and others participated in what I call the United States coup d'etat. Speaker 7: There's no doubt in my mind that Al Gore was elected president. Speaker 10: I rise to object to the fraudulent 25 Florida electoral votes. Speaker 2: I must object Because of the overwhelming evidence of official misconduct, deliberate fraud, and an attempt to The chairman must provide. Speaker 10: It Signed by myself on behalf of my diverse constituents and the millions of Americans who have been disenfranchised by Florida's in Accurate vote count for Supreme Court, not the people Speaker 11: of the United States, decided this election. Speaker 10: Speaking to a Democratic group in Chicago Tuesday, he made it clear He thinks Al Gore was the winner. Speaker 2: By the time it was over, our candidate had won the popular vote, And the only way they could win the election was to stop the voting in Florida. Catherine Harris, Jeb Bush, Jim Baker, and the Supreme court hadn't tampered with the results. Al Gore would be president. Speaker 4: The Supreme Court elected president. 2004. Yeah. Laura won the state of Florida in 2000, although not the presidency. Speaker 13: But the Supreme Court hampered? That's a large charge. The Supreme Court stopped the counting votes. And if they let the count go on, they all would've got the necessary votes. Speaker 0: The Supreme Court selected George w Bush As the president, he was not elected. Speaker 10: There is overwhelming evidence that George w Bush did not win this election. Speaker 14: What I observed, as a voter, Speaker 15: as a citizen of Illinois, 4 years ago, were troubling evidence of the fact that not every vote was being counted. Speaker 7: Don't think that George w Bush won the election, in 2000. I guess that would go because I I think that he probably lost Florida and also that nationwide. Speaker 13: If you invite me back on this show in about 8 weeks, I think you're gonna learn that Al Gore actually did get all the votes there. Speaker 2: The court has been thwarting formation of the popular will. The most spectacular example being Bush versus Gore, where the majority by a five four vote enjoined the counting of more than a100000 ballots Speaker 12: in Florida and essentially gave America its 1st court appointed president. Speaker 2: The system is bankrupted and stolen. I think Speaker 16: in 2000, Everybody talked, well, Speaker 2: he did win the election. It'll court. Speaker 0: After the election, when you stole the election, you came back here and said, get over it. No. We're not gonna get over Speaker 2: You know it. I know it. They know it. We won that election. Speaker 17: Constantly shifting vote tallies in Ohio and malfunctioning electronic machines, which may not have paper receipts, have led to additional loss of confidence by the public. Speaker 2: The right to vote has been stolen from qualified voters. Speaker 10: In 2004, the democratic process was thwarted. Speaker 2: The 2004 Presidential election at Ohio was riddled with unnecessary problems. Speaker 5: Some machines malfunctioned, causing votes to be counted more than once or not at all. Speaker 18: Based upon an Inordinate number of allegations suggesting gross voting rights violations and misconduct, I join with my colleagues in objective to counting the State of Ohio's electoral votes. Speaker 16: As in 2000, the votes of many who wanted to vote were not, in fact, counted. Speaker 19: This last Friday night, I I arranged to meet senator Kerry at fundraiser to give him a copy of my book. He told me he now thinks the election was stolen. Speaker 5: The wife of John Kerry said she has lingering doubts doubts about the legitimacy of the election. Her theory goes like this. 2 brothers, she calls hard right Republicans, Own 80% of voting machines in the US. Therefore, it would be easy to hack into the mother machines that To control the electronic voting. Speaker 10: There were numerous irregularities in Ohio, including large percentages of rejections The provisional balloting, problems with voting machines. Speaker 1: As we look at our election system, I think it's fair to say that there are many legitimate questions about its accuracy, about its integrity. Speaker 17: There are still legitimate Concerns over the integrity of our elections. Speaker 20: Question, obviously, is how many instances were not caught that we don't know about? Number 1, we've seen a lot of what I Honest glitches where it just didn't work right, but also that these machines are hackable. A dishonest employee of the vendor or a dishonest employee of the local board of elections Or simply someone who knows electronics, and has a computer at home, could hack into these machines and then put in a secret instruction to disregard every 20th Democratic vote or at 10% to the carrier, to the Bush vote, or whatever, he might not ever know it. Speaker 2: I agree with tens of millions of Americans who are All very worried that when they cast the ballot on an electronic voting machine, that there is no paper trail to record That vote. The numerous irregularities that occurred with the electronic voting machines in Ohio on November 2nd last year Point to an unresolved national crisis. Speaker 10: We cannot declare that the election of November 2, 2004 was free and clear and and transparent and real. There must be independent testing of the voting machines used in Ohio. Speaker 21: I'm not confident that the election in Ohio was fairly decided. We know that there was substantial voter suppression, and the machines were not reliable. Speaker 17: The members of congress who have brought this challenge are Speaking up for their aggrieved constituents, many of whom may have been disenfranchised in this process. Speaker 16: Treating today's electoral vote in congress as a meaningless ritual would be an insult to our democracy unless we registered our own protest against the obviously flawed voting process that took place in so many of our states. Speaker 22: Voters who wish to cast a vote for president or vice president can't approach the polls with certainty that their vote will be counted. Speaker 13: One of Speaker 23: the most significant problems in Ohio and in many other states was the lack of measures to ensure the integrity of electronic floating machines. Speaker 24: In 2004, they caused Democratic voters in Ohio to wait for 8 hours before they could cast ballot. They turn the department of civil rights and the justice department into the voter suppression division with voter ID laws, voter purging, voter Caging, voter intimidation. There aren't gonna be any more election stealing. Speaker 11: And despite the final tally and the inauguration and the situation we find ourselves in, I do have one very affirmative statement to make. Speaker 0: We won. Without Voter suppression. Stacey Abrams would be the governor of Georgia. Andrew Gillum is the governor of Florida. Speaker 11: I acknowledge that former secretary of state Brian Kemp will We'll be certified as the victor in the 2018 gubernatorial election. This is not a speech of concession. Speaker 1: If she had a fair election, She already would have won. Speaker 11: You refused to concede and say that you lost. Do you stand by that decision today? Absolutely. The election was not fair. The process was not fair. Speaker 2: If Stacey Abrams doesn't win in Georgia, they stole it. It's clear. It's clear. Speaker 13: I Speaker 15: think that Stacey Abrams' election is being stolen from her. Speaker 9: You, notably did not concede. I did not. Okay. You acknowledged that he won, But you did not concede. Speaker 11: Correct. Speaker 9: 5 months later, do you still feel like your opponent won through voter suppression? Speaker 11: Yes. Georgia voters did not have their votes counted. They were not allowed to cast votes. They had their votes discarded. Speaker 2: She would be the governor of Georgia today had the governor of Georgia not disenfranchised 1,400,000 Georgia voters before the election. That's what happened to Stacey Abrams. They took the votes away. Speaker 9: Was the election in Georgia statewide a free and fair election? Speaker 11: It was not a free and fair election. Speaker 9: Reminder, she wrote, Brian Kemp stole the gubernatorial election from Georgians and Stacey Abrams. Speaker 11: And it was not fair to those who filled up absentee ballots. And depending on the county you sent it to, it either was counted or not count it assuming you received it in time. Brian Kemp oversaw for 8 years the systematic and systemic dismantling of our receipt. And that means there could not be free and fair elections in Georgia. Speaker 16: Certainly gave the appearance of unfairness. I think it was, unfairness. He ran a great campaign. He probably won. Speaker 11: But will I say that this election was not tainted, was not a disinvestment and a disenfranchisement of thousands of Voters, I will not say that. Speaker 1: Candidates, both black and white, lost their races because they have been deprived of the votes they otherwise would have gotten. And the clearest example is from next door in Georgia. Stacey Abrams should be governor leading that state right now. Speaker 11: So you don't feel that you lost fair and square. Speaker 6: I'm not saying it's gonna be legit. It's the increase in the prospect of being illegitimate is a direct proportion of us not being able to get these These reforms passed.

@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

I know you guys were waiting on an AOC THREAD but how else could I get all these Democrats to read this? They need to see the truth, I knew they would promote something that might get me sued, if you wish to donate to my THREADS I added my link below: https://www.creditcadabra.com/dom-lucre-twitter-thread-collection/

DeepBlueCrypto
Posted - June 14, 2023 at 1:08 AM
Saved - October 2, 2023 at 9:43 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The Clinton family's political power dates back to the 70s when Bill Clinton married Hillary Clinton after meeting at Yale law school. Bill became attorney general and later a two-term governor before being elected president in 1992. There have been claims of a curse surrounding the Clintons, with individuals connected to them dying under mysterious circumstances. Allegations of suicides, accidents, and natural causes have raised questions. The Clintons' involvement with Jeffrey Epstein and controversies surrounding their foundation have also been highlighted. Additionally, there are suspicions surrounding Barack Obama, including his connection to Epstein and the deaths of individuals close to him. These claims, though controversial, continue to circulate.

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

It’s a well known fact that the Clinton family is very powerful in American politics. They’ve been in positions of power since the 70s. Bill Clinton married Hillary Clinton in 1975 after they met in Yale law school. After finishing law school he returned back to Arkansas, elected as attorney general and followed up as two term governor for the state. Bill Clinton was elected as president in 1992. The Clinton family has a curse… sort of like any one getting too close to the family dies of natural causes or through suicides or accidents. A thread on Clintons for awareness

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

Here’s a prev thread on Clintons

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

#ClintonSuicides #ClintonMurders

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

#ClintonSuicides #ClintonMurders

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

#ClintonSuicides #ClintonMurders

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

#ClintonSuicides #ClintonMurders

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

#ClintonSuicides #ClintonMurders

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

#ClintonSuicides #ClintonMurders

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

#ClintonSuicides #ClintonMurders

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

#ClintonSuicides #ClintonMurders

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

#ClintonSuicides #ClintonMurders

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

#ClintonSuicides #ClintonMurders

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

#ClintonSuicides #ClintonMurders

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

#ClintonSuicides #ClintonMurders

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

#ClintonSuicides #ClintonMurders

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

#ClintonSuicides #ClintonMurders

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

#ClintonSuicides #ClintonMurders

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

Ignore Hillary’s Emails Ignore Biden’s Garage documents Arrest Donald Trump for documents

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

If you have dirt on the Clintons, you better run for your life… because you never know where deaths gonna get ya

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

JULIAN ASSANGE EXPOSED Hillary Clinton’s lies, corruption, murders and assassinations. Leaked docs show the role she played in the destruction of Syria and the assassination of Muammar Gaddafi.

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

When #HillaryClinton knew about Donald Trump’s indictment, her response was… “BUT HER EMAILS” She’s literally laughing at y’all incompetent Republicans who couldn’t do anything about it.

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

The Clinton Chronicles – The Bill Clinton Murders | Exposed: The Clinton’s and the CIA, Trafficking Cocaine — Documentary Must Watch Documentary 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥 https://rumble.com/v1g3axh-the-clinton-chronicles-murders-and-the-cia-trafficking-cocaine-sex-whitewat.html

The Clinton Chronicles — Murders & the CIA — Trafficking Cocaine — Sex — WhiteWater — Documentary The Clinton Chronicles – The Bill Clinton Murders | Exposed: The Clinton’s and the CIA, Trafficking Cocaine — Documentary I wonder how long this will be up before YouTube takes it down.I will load thi rumble.com

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

You’re better off keeping your mouth shut about Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton, their shady dealings with Clinton Foundation and their Epstein links https://t.co/riowxIOq4g

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

#HillaryClinton responds to a direct question on what she thinks about she getting off easy vs. them arresting Donald Trump She thinks the extent to which people support Trump in this country is bizarre https://t.co/eR7HfUnZX2

Video Transcript AI Summary
Republicans claim that Comey let me off too easily, but I find it absurd how that's their only response. They refuse to read the indictment or engage with the facts. This is about me, not anyone else, no matter how much they try to confuse people. It's disturbing to see their efforts to defend this man. This could have been the opportunity to acknowledge his contributions and move on, but they're all in again. I struggle to understand the psychology behind it.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Republicans claim that you got off you did the same thing and got off scot free. Why did your friend, Jim Comey, let you off so easy? Speaker 1: That that's a really good question. I can't figure that one out. You know, I do think it's it's, Odd, let's just say, to the point of being absurd, how that is their only response. You know, they refuse to read the indictment. They refuse to engage With the facts. There's nothing new about that. And what they refuse to admit is, you know, this is on a track about him, Not about anybody else. No matter how much, they try to confuse people and how much they try to, you know, raise extraneous issues. And it's going to be fascinating, I guess, in a bizarre and sad way to watch them spin themselves up. If you watched any of the news programs this weekend. I mean, their efforts to defend this man are truly beyond anything that I ever thought possible In our country, I mean, it is so profoundly disturbing how this could have been the break. This could have been the opportunity to say, you know, thank you so much for everything you've done for us. We really appreciate it, you know. But this is kind of, serious. And so we're not going to, you know, continue to defend you. But no, they're all in again. That's what the psychology of this is so hard for me to fully grasp.

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

Where are the investigations against the Clintons and the Bidens 🤷‍♂️ https://t.co/wS3AR7zn2w

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

Clinton and Biden whistleblowers usually follow the same fate They’re either found dead by suicide, robbery gone wrong, unintended accident or a gunshot… https://t.co/PrJ6zWeKqK

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

Is Devon Archer the next one in line for the suicide hotline 🤷‍♂️ https://t.co/h8KQ8xDhO6

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

Died mysteriously, coroner died of poisoning https://t.co/7iX5sQZbGE

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

If only #HillaryClinton was president… https://t.co/kYvYD2zhGd

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

Hillary Clinton did not have textual relations with that server https://t.co/WvcNT03HIB

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

#HillaryClinton at 45 years in 1992 https://t.co/3W4CFRaM2g

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

Do any of these guys know Hillary 😂 https://t.co/HsLiWgsKDz

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

Breaking: Just got a message that Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton are very interested https://t.co/jYguP70N7a

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

Is this true Barack Obama https://t.co/K67eZkjk0P

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

https://t.co/cDZmOpA9PQ

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

https://t.co/dHCX77kNNl

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

https://t.co/SQocq0HMfA

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

Bill and Hillary Clinton get called about visiting #EpsteinIsland and on the #LolitaExpress https://t.co/5nVdOA88XJ

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 mentions feeling like a dog catcher and going to formation for president twice. Speaker 1 interrupts, wanting to discuss Jeffrey Epstein, but Speaker 0 refuses, saying they are walking and feeling sad about it.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You know, I I could I don't think I can feel like a dog catcher down there. I said, go to formation for president twice. And, Speaker 1: this is boring. Why don't you talk about Jeffrey Epstein? I wanna know about you and Jeffrey Epstein. Talk about. No. No. You that when we talk about Jeffrey Epstein lying on the road express. I thought that's not you don't have to push me, man. That's not I'm I'm walking. Feel sad about it and so I would, you know, we both love

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

#HillaryClinton #FrazzleDrip #HumaAbedin https://t.co/xQDz746WaT

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

https://t.co/lyaFJqd18J

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

Pope Francis is met with former US President Bill Clinton, along with Alex Soros, at the Pope's residence at the Casa Santa Marta. https://t.co/CSX5ydMoNz

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

The Clinton body bags https://t.co/uRIT4pOjHr

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

Please caption this image https://t.co/z0uK2EKQWd

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

Bill Clinton getting a massage from Chauntae Davis who accused Jeffrey Epstein of rape https://t.co/Wu2NPR6kLi

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

https://t.co/N107t3jbVe

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

https://t.co/VtauOQumtx

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

Secret blows in the White House If you know… you know https://t.co/cq1lybPT2M

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

What’s the probability that two Chefs of the White House and the Obamas kicked the bucked before their time https://t.co/g82pccNiFu

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

Was Obama behind the accidental drowning of his 45 year old personal Sous chef Tafari Campbell while he was supposedly paddle boarding https://t.co/vI7KoTSeKK

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

Obamas — did you place an order? https://t.co/TYVOgbGPkf

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

Is Obama a grim reaper with a smily face https://t.co/OHao74rw9O

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

Hillary Clinton blames MAGA republicans for #ClimateCrisis Wow what’s next… MAGA is responsible for the Ukraine war🤷‍♂️ https://t.co/PnvjGQbFv8

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

If Hillary Clinton says it’s true… it is right? https://t.co/cAaMg9BnO2

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

Kevin Spacey and The Clintons have a similar way of operations Accusers die of mysterious causes DEAD MEN TELL NO TALES https://t.co/4qDtZVs0Ya

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

The police call log for Tafari Campbell drowning left out the details of the second paddle boarder of course There’s always more questions than answers when elites are involved in crimes, suicides, accidents & deaths

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

Is Devon Archer next on the list 🤷‍♂️ https://t.co/3fwgdLbbPP

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

#BidenCrimeFamilly makes Hillary Clinton look like a beautiful angel 😂 https://t.co/aRgWPwUdoR

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

Couple of days after his personal chef and friend died in a very mysterious paddle boarding accident, Barack Obama appears to have injured fingers and a black eye. Seems suspicious doesn’t it 🤷‍♂️ https://t.co/zVmTx6LZRH

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

How polls work these days Polls can be bought also… if you didn’t know https://t.co/oawRDltr42

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

Obama and his personal chef https://t.co/pvuUsHSOJ3

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

A Clinton classic https://t.co/QO68X4tT3o

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

Bizarre Bill Clinton painting from Jeffrey Epstein’s Manhattan home https://t.co/jtyovgt8i7

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

Hillary Clinton was a liar Hillary Clinton is a liar Hillary Clinton will be a liar https://t.co/FiM6Z6zV98

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

https://t.co/6d3gcbPlHz

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

Joan Rivers called out Michelle Obama as a transgender woman. Rivers died shortly after this revelation… can you connect the dots https://t.co/Eu6o84QOgz

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 officiated a wedding in New York, which made a lot of news. They are excited about this new career move. When asked about the possibility of the first gay president or nominee, Speaker 0 mentions that it has already happened with Obama. There is a moment of confusion when Speaker 0 mistakenly refers to Michelle as transgender, but quickly corrects themselves.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You made a ton of news officiating the wedding in New York yesterday. Is this like a is this like a new, cottage, career move for you? I am so excited. Yeah. I should do very well because I don't join. And do you think that the country will see the 1st the United States will see the 1st gay president or the 1st nominee? Already have it with Obama, so let's Just calm down. Got it. You know Michelle is a trans I'm sorry. She's a what? Okay. A transgender. We all know. Oh my gosh. Oh gosh. It's okay.

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

Hillary Clinton was behind almost every false conspiracy theory of the last 25 years including the Russian collusion. Of course Ukraine is Russians fault, of course Maui wildfires are a Russians plot. https://t.co/WlUWafux1u

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

You can run the best campaign You can even become the nominee But you can have the election stolen from you https://t.co/gu5vYquVVo

Video Transcript AI Summary
I advise candidates that despite running a strong campaign and becoming the nominee, there is still a risk of having the election stolen from them.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I've been telling candidates who have come to see me, you can run the best campaign. You can even become the nominee, And you can have the election stolen from you.

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

How convenient for #HillaryClinton https://t.co/FCsHheCGb9

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

Deaths caused by Hurricane Hilary to be labeled as suicides #HurricaneHillary https://t.co/SpcgHpF1Jm

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

https://t.co/zVhoZ9ptak

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

Some deaths don’t follow logic. They’re supposed to be accepted as they’re told by the mainstream media. Questioning logic potentially have some really bad consequences. https://t.co/rqPlYPq54t

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

https://t.co/rVnyY1Op3G

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

Walter Scheib was Bill & Hillary's chef from 1994-2005. He died while "hiking" in Mexico, but what doesn't make sense is his body was found only 30 yards from his car. They said he got caught up in a flash flood and drowned. Sounds very suspicious doesn’t it 🤷‍♂️ https://t.co/d7ffLWQcWV

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

Watch this clip from Hillary Clinton interview… very funny 😂😂😂😂 https://t.co/sEXRzRhlSK

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: My main focus as president will be the economy, creating more good jobs and ensuring rising incomes for everyone. We need to make the economy work for all, not just the wealthy. [Commercial break] Donald Trump: I'm Donald Trump and I approve this message. Washington is broken, controlled by special interests and lobbyists. We will make America great again. Interviewer: Why did you play my opponent's commercial during our interview? Donald Trump: He paid me in steaks. It's a good cut of meat, but I think it's part of the asshole. Interviewer: It was nice talking to you, Mrs. Clinton. How can I reach you? Hillary Clinton: Email.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What's gonna be the number one focus of your presidency? Oh, Zack, it has to be the economy. We need more good jobs with rising incomes. We gotta make the economy work for everybody, not just those at the top. We need to take a break. We just need to have a word from our sponsor. Okay. Washington is broken. The truth is too many politicians are totally controlled by special interests and lobbyists. We're going to make America great again. I'm Donald Trump, and I approve this message. He approves the message. Why would you play a commercial for my opponent in the middle of our interview. He paid me in steaks. I'd be afraid to eat them if I were you. It's a good cut of meat. I think it's part of the asshole. Well, this has been a lot of fun, missus Clinton. We should stay in touch. What's the best way to reach you? Email?

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

Is Barack Obama going to go after the guy who he had sex with next after his chef 🤷‍♂️ https://t.co/KDefvptKg4

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

Straight blue is the only way to elect criminals, tax evaders, drug addicts, pedophiles, global elitists and the evil cabal that runs this world https://t.co/4DFmh4HzRX

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

It has been a bad year for Barack Obama aka #BathhouseBarry 1. He has been exposed for having his chef murdered. 2. Connection with Epstein has been established. 3. Mainstream media has confirmed him as a homosexual. 4. Donald Trump Jr couldn't say with a straight face if Michelle Obama was a woman. 5. Exposed for land grab in Hawaii after the DEW. The last thing should should go viral is his hotdog stand in Hawaii. H/t: @ShadowofEzra

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

Barack Obama likes dudes and he got exposed by a guy who he had sex with #BathHouseBarry https://t.co/GNuBdQ1A70

Video Transcript AI Summary
A man shares his experience of meeting someone named Barack Obama at a bar, whom he later discovered was the former president. He recounts doing drugs and engaging in sexual activities with Obama, expressing surprise at not recognizing him. The interviewer asks about Obama's behavior on crack, to which the man suggests it wasn't his first time. The interviewer highlights the potential significance of such information during a presidential campaign, but the man believes the media is hesitant to report the truth.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You're just a guy who's in town for the night, and it sounds like you're looking to party. Speaker 1: Yes. Pulled up in a bar outside, and there's this guy that's introduced to me as Barack Obama. I had given Barack $250 to pay for Coke. I start putting a line on a CD tray to snort. And next thing I know, he's got a little pipe, and he's smoking. So I just started rubbing my hand along his side to see where it was going, and it went the direction I had intended it to go. Speaker 0: Even though you had sex with him twice, you did cocaine with him, watch him smoke crack twice. You had no idea who he was. Speaker 1: I had no idea who he was. The obvious Speaker 0: question, what was Obama like on crack? Is it your sense that that's who Obama is? Just transactional or that he's bisexual? Like, what is this? Speaker 1: It definitely wasn't Barack's first time and I would almost be willing to bet you it wasn't as long. Speaker 0: The guy's running for president and credible information comes out that smoking crack and having sex with dudes. That seems like a story. Speaker 1: Well, it would be a story if the media really scared about telling people the truth.

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

https://t.co/5Tbl3wZ16e

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

https://t.co/b2TYVf99T5

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

Barack Obama — I’d like to place an order https://t.co/fSNPdADJZu

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

Suicide or Homicide… what difference does it make 🤷‍♂️ https://t.co/j0oWI9xXpm

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

#BathhouseBarry Barack Obama gave presidential freedom medals to a long list of satanic pedophiles who were regular guests of Jeffrey Epstein. https://t.co/UlSb7J2DnB

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

Barack Obama flew in little boys and little girls for a private White House Party and the FBI & secret service doesn’t investigate #PizzaGate https://t.co/jmdihY7R05

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

Perhaps there’s a smoking gun with the Clinton’s after all https://t.co/Pg5o6hdoZx

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

Barack Obama spent about $65,000 of the tax-payers money flying in pizza/dogs from Chicago for a private party at the White House back in 2009. So y’all taxpayers don’t mind paying money for his sexcapades right. You are obviously used to paying for Hunter Biden anyway 🤷‍♂️ https://t.co/a6t3SPBmXV

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

What are your thoughts on Michelle Obama being the Democratic nominees for 2024 due to declining health of Joe Biden https://t.co/EylYDkhvGO

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

What’s wrong with people these days. Don’t they think before they write 😂 https://t.co/4Wemq9sEIC

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

Probably not that surprising https://t.co/6QrA6urQf7

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

Alex Jones on what Jeffrey Epstein did for the Clinton’s https://t.co/MXHAI1l5mh

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers discuss allegations of government officials being involved in pedophilia, child trafficking, and grooming of children. They mention Jeffrey Epstein's connection with Clinton as an example.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: One of the Speaker 1: things you've been talking about on your show is your allegation that government officials are aiding in pedophilia, child trafficking, and the grooming of children. Right? Speaker 2: What do you mean like? What Jeffrey Epstein did with Clinton's? Tomorrow's putting that here. Every

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

At the eleventh anniversary of the Benghazi attacks… Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton allowed these four men to die https://t.co/m1MAwR73W9

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

Barack Obamas life story, where he was born, who raised him and what shaped his career https://t.co/9dDrC1XqXY

Video Transcript AI Summary
Barack Obama's life story begins in a small village in Kenya, where his father was born and raised. His father, Barack Obama Sr., was among the first generation of Africans to study in the United States. After his parents' marriage, Obama spent his early years in Hawaii, but his father left when he was two. Growing up without his father had a major impact on Obama, as he struggled to figure out his identity. He later moved to Indonesia with his mother and stepfather, where he faced challenges in understanding his racial identity. Obama eventually returned to Hawaii for high school and attended college on the mainland. He then went on to Harvard Law School, where he excelled and became the first African American editor of the Harvard Law Review. Obama's experiences and background have shaped his political career and his ability to connect with people from diverse backgrounds.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: My father was a foreign student born and raised in a small village in Kenya. He grew up herding goats, went to school in a tin roofed cat. My father met my mother. She was born in a town on the other side of the world, in Kansas. Speaker 1: Barack Obama's compelling life story helped catapult him onto the national stage with his speech to the Democratic National Convention. The story begins in a small village in southeast Kenya, home to the Obama family. Obama's father, Barack Obama senior, was among the 1st generation of Africans to receive a scholarship to study in the United States and the 1st to be accepted at the University of Hawaii. There, he met a fellow student Who had recently moved to Hawaii with her parents. Anne Dunham had spent her early years in tiny Augusta, Kansas. That Kansas front porch Was a long way from Hawaii where racial attitudes were more relaxed. Obama's great uncle remembers being somewhat taken aback With the news that his niece had married a black man from Kenya. What did you think when you found out she'd married a Kenyan? Speaker 2: I wondered what was going on out there in Hawaii. Speaker 1: Barack, Known then as Barry, spent his early years on the beaches and playgrounds of Hawaii. But life changed dramatically When he was only 2 and his father abandoned his wife and son to accept a scholarship to Harvard. After completing his PhD, Obama senior returned to Kenya. Berry saw his father only one more time when he was 10 and his father returned to Hawaii for a visit. 11 years later, Barack Obama senior was killed in an automobile accident in Kenya. Growing up without his father had a major impact on Obama. Speaker 3: I think that shaped him because when you don't have that father figure, you're always struggling to figure out what it means to be a man If you don't have someone that is yours to to emulate. So I think that his pursuit was finding that piece of himself that would, Answer some of those questions, probably, subconsciously make that father that he didn't know proud of him. Speaker 1: Though at age 6, young Barry did gain a stepfather. His mother met and married a Muslim graduate student at the University of Hawaii who was from Indonesia. Barry and his mother moved to Indonesia, and soon a half sister was born. Indonesia's poverty and its politics, which had victimized his stepfather, left a lasting impression on the young biracial child trying to fit into yet another culture. It was in Indonesia where Berry first saw magazine stories and And adds about blacks bleaching their skin, a painful moment in his exploration of his own racial identity. Speaker 4: And I remember coming across this magazine that, talked about, blacks who had used skin bleaching agents to make themselves lighter. And, and I think that, was when I first realized not only that, I was African American, Which I I think I had a pretty good sense of at that point, but also that, there were all sorts of implications to race and there were power relationships in race. And I couldn't articulate all that at the time, but I remember feeling, shocked by that. Speaker 1: Life changed again when Barry was sent back to Hawaii at age 10 To attend the prestigious Punahou School. Unhappy with the schools in Indonesia, his mother wanted him to get the best education possible. During most of his high school years, his mother remained in Indonesia, and Barry lived with his grandparents. Academically, Punahou was excellent. But even though the student body was diverse, he was often the only black student in his class. In his autobiography written at age 33, He describes his struggles to define himself. I was engaged in a fitful interior struggle. I was trying to raise myself to be a black man in America. And beyond the given of my appearance, no one around me seemed to know exactly What that meant. My brother The restless teenager spent hours on the basketball court Where he says he found his closest white and black friends. He tried marijuana and later cocaine. Speaker 3: If he had been the same kid growing up on the south side of Chicago, I think his outcomes might be a bit different. But there wasn't a lot to lot of trouble to get in in Hawaii. To hear his friends, and he and his friends talk about what they did. It's like you could screw up in Hawaii and still be okay. Speaker 1: His great uncle says he's not surprised to learn of his nephew's identity struggles. Speaker 2: He wasn't raised black Because he was raised in the white family and raised as if he were a white boy. And, I'm sure that caused all kinds of conflicts in his mind. Speaker 5: I think he came came out of Speaker 2: it well, and perhaps, even gives him an insight into American society that Not many blacks or whites have. Speaker 1: What caused him to struggle as an adolescent Has now become an important political asset and part of his political identity. Were you essentially raised though as a white child? Speaker 4: No. I I don't think I don't think so. I mean, I was raised as an Indonesian child and as a Hawaiian child and, and as an as a Black and white child. And so, you know, I think that, you know, part of what I benefit from is a multiplicity of cultures, that, you know, all, Speaker 5: fed me. Speaker 1: Young Barry pulled his life together, graduated from Punahou, and accepted a scholarship to the mostly white Occidental College in Los Angeles. But he was dissatisfied and transferred to Columbia University in New York City his junior year, hoping to find more black students Or at least a broader black community. While at Columbia, he began using his given name, Barak, which means the blessings of God. Armed with his degree from Columbia, Obama first worked in a financial consulting firm in Manhattan. But a year later, he opted for a far less lucrative community organizing job in Chicago. While working for social change in Chicago's public housing, Obama began to find a place for himself in the African American community. Area churches and their pastors, Both black and white were an important part of his work. Speaker 6: He basically invited us in, to sit down and said, look. Here, you have an issue that's important in your neighborhood and you're an African American pastor. But here's a pastor who sits right on the other side of the, of your neighborhood who has the same issues, and he just happens to be white, but the issues are the same. So it makes sense to sit down And talk about those issues collectively. Speaker 1: Those early days of organizing produced a still existing group, the Developing Communities Project, And fueled Obama's interest in a political career. Speaker 7: He saw some of these stubborn, intractable problems that were plaguing neighborhoods and holding people back, and he wanted to do something about it. Saw public life as the best way. Speaker 1: But before he went on to law school in politics, he traveled to Kenya to meet the side of his family he had never known. His father had died 6 years earlier, But he spent time with his grandmother in a small village his father had called home. Years later, Obama's grandmother proudly shows off pictures of her now famous grandson. He's just like his father who loved people. He used to draw out a proud when he came home. The month in Kenya with his father's side of the family proved to be critical for Obama. Speaker 4: Until I've gone back and sat at his grave and understood the struggles that he had gone through and and and his father's struggles. You know, it gave me a sense that The work I was doing was directly connected to, you know, my own family and, and their own struggles. And and I think that, helped to to unify, my outward self with my inward self in, in an important way. Speaker 1: So it was a young man more at ease with himself and his identity And clearer about his goals who arrived on the Harvard campus in 1988. Even among the highly talented And competitive law school students, Obama stood out. Speaker 6: Of all the people that I've encountered as students, 1,000 in my 33 years, I don't think I've encountered anyone with greater combination of heart, charisma, brilliance, and potential than Barack Obama. Speaker 1: His professors say Obama went after everything Harvard has to offer. He immersed himself in the study of the law. He became involved in the Black Student Union And he was elected president of the Harvard Law Review. He was the 1st African American editor of the Law Review, The most prestigious and widely read law journal in the country. Speaker 8: Being president of the Harvard Law Review is At least a 40 hour a week job. Now, this is in addition to people who are full time students And Barack did this all with a kind of poise An equanimity that was really quite remarkable. He was working very hard but You know, the old adage never let him see you sweat. Most people never saw him sweat. Speaker 1: The law review presidency brought Obama his 1st national publicity and could have been his ticket to a supreme court clerkship Or a high paying job at a prestigious downtown law firm. Instead, he chose a small Chicago law firm housed in a north side Brownstone. The choice surprised and delighted law firm partner, Justin Miner, who had made the recruiting call to Harvard. Speaker 9: A young lady answered the telephone and, I think I mispronounced Barack's name, and so she quickly corrected me and said this must be a recruitment call. And I said, well, I guess, yes, it is. And she said, well, I can put your name on the list, and I think you're 7143rd. Speaker 1: Why do you think he came to your law firm? Speaker 2: Well, I think we did what Speaker 9: he was interested in doing. He was interested in civil rights. He was interested in economic development in the minority community, and we do a lot of both. Speaker 1: Obama made a choice in his personal life as well. He met and married Michelle Robinson, Who had grown up on Chicago's south side and had gone to Princeton and Harvard Law School, graduating 3 years before Obama. They met when she was assigned to recruit him to join one of the city's top law firms, Sidley and Austin. Speaker 3: The firm is abuzz about this brilliant young African American male who everybody's trying to recruit. And I am always a cynic. I was a skeptic then. And my view was I'm sure that this is Just a black man who can talk straight, and that's why people love him. But I'm like, let me be the judge of whether he's great. So I was skeptical, and then I found out that he grew up in Hawaii. And I thought, okay. He's nuts. He's gotta be nuts. I mean, what, you know, what normal black People grow up in Hawaii. Speaker 1: But her skepticism soon faded. Speaker 3: I mean, we just clicked. It was we laughed about the same things. He was cynical in a way that was Not jaded, but funny. He had a great sense of humor. He didn't take himself too seriously. But I was impressed with just what people are impressed with is How did this young man with this strange background turn out to be such an interesting surprise? Speaker 1: But Michelle Obama's mother was a little worried about the mixed heritage of her future son-in-law. Speaker 3: A little bit. It that didn't concern me as much as had he been completely white. And I guess that I Worry about races mixing because of the difficulty, not for so much for prejudice or anything. It's just very hard. Speaker 1: Today, Marion Robinson dotes on her 2 young grandchildren, and Obama says it is his wife and his daughters that helped keep his priorities straight. Speaker 4: They constantly remind me that, I'm just 1 person, and, hopefully, I can make a contribution. But, you know, what's significant is, you know, that continuing legacy that we've passed on to the next generation. Speaker 10: Morning tonight by Obama. Speaker 1: Obama's 2 young daughters have had to share their father with politics From the time they were born, he was first elected to the Illinois State Senate in 1996. And it wasn't long before he was making an impact, Says senate president Emile Jones. Speaker 5: Well, he had the ability to talk with all those on the, who were, opposition to legislation. But he he he is able to do it in such a manner that he was not dogmatic His approach and, and pretty soon, everyone began to respect him more. Speaker 1: But 4 years later, when Obama challenged popular incumbent Bobby Rush For his congressional seat, many thought Obama was pushing too hard, too fast. He lost. And some in the black community Questioned whether his mixed heritage, lack of Chicago roots, and Harvard Law degree meant he was too elitist or Not black enough to represent the predominantly African American district. It is a charge that infuriates his wife. Speaker 3: I'm as black as it gets. I was born on the south side. I come from an obviously black family. We weren't rich. You know? I put my blackness up against anybody's blackness in the state. Okay? And Barack is a black man. And he's done more in terms of meeting his commitments and sticking his neck out for this communities and many people who criticize him, and I can say that because I'm black. Speaker 1: The charge faded when Obama captured an astonishing 53% of the vote In a 7 person field in the senate Democratic primary, winning the black vote overwhelmingly, but also winning in white ethnic awards In the collar counties and breaking even or winning precincts downstate. Axelrod attributes Obama's success in part To his ability to connect with people from all backgrounds. Speaker 7: His father was from Kenya and is black and his mother was white and from Kansas. His sister is Indonesian. I think she's married to some, someone who's Chinese. Yeah. Yeah. He's like a bigots' worst nightmare. I mean, he's someone who's comfortable wherever he goes and that part of that is having gone through the struggle of figuring out who he is of really struggling with with this Issue of race and ethnicity in our society, I think it's made him a, a really universal kind of figure Who people respond to Speaker 10: Ashley, thank you so much. I really appreciate it. I really appreciate it. Speaker 1: That positive response to Obama His fuel speculation that at some point, he will be on a national ticket. Speaker 8: The fact that people he has touched people in the way he has And that people really believe that this is possible maybe not just possible but probable, says an awful lot about him But it also says something positive and hopeful about us. Speaker 1: Obama brushes all such speculation aside and focuses on November. Speaker 0: Doctor. King once said, he said, the arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends toward justice. It bends towards justice. But it doesn't bend on its own. It bends because we helped bend it that way. It bends because you're gonna get folks registered, and you're gonna go to the polls, And we're gonna have Speaker 10: a whole democratic slate in Russia. And you're gonna have a new United States senator. And his name is gonna be Barack Obama. Thank you very much, everybody. God bless you guys.

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

Barack Obama is the man https://t.co/PPcJ9EkpFx

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

Truth 😂 https://t.co/2ayy6TnieF

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

All Clinton associate deaths (burglary, robbery, suicides, accidents) are just pure coincidences https://t.co/lSMZOFXyHN

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

42 PAST INCIDENTS at Barack and Michelle Obama’s house Why so many incidents🤷‍♂️ https://t.co/YQYUPU34a2

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

https://t.co/oGZ4vBf7KM

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

Laura Silsby and the Clinton Foundation were caught red handed trafficking children out of Haiti. Mainstream media covered it up and was never reported. https://t.co/wYUv25mTPj

Video Transcript AI Summary
In 2009, Laura Silsbee founded a non-profit called New Life Children's Refuge to rescue orphaned children in Haiti and the Dominican Republic. However, in 2010, Silsbee and her group were accused of unlawfully trying to take children out of the country. It was later revealed that Hillary Clinton received updates on Silsbee's case through email. Silsbee had faced similar charges before but was not prosecuted. Former President Bill Clinton appointed a lawyer named Jorge Puelo to represent Silsbee, who had a history of involvement in human trafficking. Silsbee later became an executive at Connexus, a software company that issues Amber alerts. Silsbee's connection to Clinton associate James Alefantis and her trial support from a friend's daughter raised further questions. The Clintons' ties to pedophilia have been a subject of controversy.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Are you coming? Are you coming? No. No. No. No coming. Not not right now. In November of 2009, a woman named Laura Silsbee founded a non profit, the New Life Children's Refuge, which described its mission as attempting to rescue orphaned and abandoned children in Haiti and Dominican Republic. 2 months later on January 29, 2010, Group allegedly tried to unlawfully take out of the country on Saturday. Laura Silsbee says the group paid no money for the Joe The mistake, obviously, we made is we did not understand that there was additional paperwork required. Would later learn through WikiLeaks that Hillary Clinton was sent email updates from Ooma Abedin and other associates regarding Silsbee's incarceration and developing legal case. This was not the 1st time Silsbee found herself facing child trafficking charges, Silsbee had been caught once before by Haitian police attempting to traffic 40 children out of the country. However, in that incident, no charges were brought against her, and she was nearly turned back at the border. A week after Silsbee was apprehended the 2nd time, on February 7, 2010, former president Bill Clinton appointed Silsbee a lawyer by the name of Jorge Puelo. Puelo was successful in getting ZILZ's charges reduced to 6 months. Jorge Puelo also had a colorful whole history with human trafficking, he was convicted of operating an international sex trafficking ring involving women and underage girls out of Central America and Haigh Buelo's wife was also arrested on the same charges. In 2011, Silkeby was appointed as CFO of the software company Connexus and would later become its vice president of marketing, one of IpaW's functions is to issue Amber alerts to the public. In the event of kidnapping, the Amber Alert system was set up during Bill Clinton's president 2015. Laura Stillsby married Norman Gaylor Antica's last name, which is how her name now appears on the Connexus website, how does a woman who was caught multiple times attempting to traffic children internationally get promoted to the executive team of the preeminent kidnapping warning system in the country. Is that Folger, a close friend of Clinton associate James Alefantis gave a statement in support of Silsbee during her trial. Folger is the daughter of Michael Maccoby who coaches leaders of Nuestros de Quellos Hermanos or NPH, a large organization that runs orphanages all over the world. Folgers son Max Maccabee is on the Board of Directors of an NPH Orphanage called Friends of the Orphans, which is one of the 7 60 orphanages operating in Haiti and happens to be the exact orphanage from which Silsbee was caught trafficking children. Curiously, Max Maccabee gave an emphatic and lengthy the statement of support for Comet Pizza during a contentious neighborhood commission meeting back when the Pizzagate controversy the exploded. It is also worth noting here that Frank Giustra, owner of the Radcliffe Foundation is on the Board of Directors for the Clinton Foundation and is a major donor to the organization, the logo of Alpeda Home, a refugee center founded by the Radcliffe Foundation happens to be almost identical in shape and color to the boy lever symbol that the FBI declassified in 2,000 scandals seemed to follow the Clintons. Their ties to pedophilia don't end there.

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

All their priorities are backwards https://t.co/C24418Rfky

@DeepBlueCrypto - 🌋🌋 Deep₿lueCrypto 🌋🌋

The potential next Democratic Presidential candidate Michelle Obama praising Harvey Weinstein, a convicted Hollywood rapist and a pedophile elite client to Jeffrey Epstein https://t.co/5UT47L8aY6

Video Transcript AI Summary
I want to thank Harvey Weinstein for organizing this incredible day. He is a remarkable person and a great friend. The fact that he and his team made this happen for all of you speaks volumes about you, not me or this place. We are here because of you. Let's get started.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: By thanking Harvey Weinstein for organizing this amazing day. This is possible because of Harvey. He He is a wonderful human being, a good friend, and just a powerhouse. And the fact that he and his team took the time to Make this happen for all of you should say something, not about me or about this place, but about you. All right, everybody. We are here because of you. I want to start
justredpillme
Posted - August 10, 2023 at 2:20 AM
Saved - October 20, 2023 at 3:34 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
In a 2017 interview with CBS Sunday Morning, Hillary Clinton suggested that Donald Trump knew he was an illegitimate president. Democrats have criticized election deniers as extremists. Video evidence supports this claim. (RedPill Rating: True) For more details, refer to the offsite article.

@justredpillme - justredpillme

Hillary Clinton Said Trump Was an Illegitimate President In an interview on CBS Sunday Morning, in September of 2017, with reporter Jane Pauley, Hillary Clinton was asked about her election campaign against Donald Trump. In response to that question, she replied: I believe he knows he is an illegitimate president. He knows… he knows... The Democrats have previously said that election deniers are extremists.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0, a former candidate, expresses gratitude for the honor of being a candidate and shares personal happiness. However, they also express concern about the damage being done to the country's future, values, and institutions. Speaker 1 mentions the continued popularity of the phrase "lock her up" in reference to Speaker 0. Speaker 0 believes that the current president knows he is illegitimate and suggests that he is obsessed with them due to a guilty conscience. Speaker 0 supports holding the president accountable and believes there should be an impeachment inquiry. They express confidence that certain events from their own election will not happen again in the future.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Being your candidate has been one of the greatest honors of my life. Speaker 1: No surprise. 3 years after the historic election of 2016, You know how you're doing Speaker 0: on any given day. Personally, I'm doing well. And Having my grandchildren and especially a new 2 month old grandson has been a gift beyond measure. I feel very blessed. I feel good. But I can't deny that a big part of me cares deeply about what's happening in the country and what I fear is the damage that's being done to our future, the damage being done to our values, our institutions, and try to think of ways that I can help those who are on the front lines of the fight. Speaker 1: Your name doesn't come up much on any campaign except for Donald Trump's. Mhmm. Lock her up is still a big Popular Speaker 0: align. I believe he knows he's an illegitimate president. He knows. He knows that There were a bunch of different reasons why the election turned out the way it did. And I take responsibility for those parts of it that I should, but, Jane, it was like Applying for a job and getting 66,000,000 letters of, recommendation and losing to A corrupt human tornado. And so I know that he knows that this wasn't on the level. I don't know that we'll ever know everything that happened, but Clearly, we know a lot and are learning more every day, and history will probably sort it all out. So of course he's obsessed with me. And I believe that it's a guilty conscience in so much as he has a conscience. Speaker 1: Of course, given the events of the past week, now the question is, how will it end? The president must be held accountable. No one is above the law. This is familiar territory for her. Speaker 0: The House Judiciary Committee voted to recommend that the House impeach president Nixon. Speaker 1: 6. In 1974, Hillary Rodham was a young lawyer on the House Judiciary Committee staff looking into the impeachment of Richard Nixon. 6 and, of course, in 1998, as Hillary Rodham Clinton You lived through an impeachment as first lady in the Clinton administration. And Speaker 0: which is such a blatant effort to use his presidential position to advance his personal and political Interests, there should be an impeachment inquiry opened. And I don't care who you're for in the Democratic primary or whether you're a Republican. When the president of the United States, who has taken an oath to protect and defend the constitution, and by that, defend the American people and their interests, Uses his position to, in effect, extort a foreign government for his own political purposes. I think that is very much what the founders worried about in high crimes and misdemeanors. Speaker 1: So What could happen if in in another Another 4 years of the Trump administration. Speaker 0: I I don't accept that. I don't believe that will happen. I believe that there were many funny things that happened in my election that will not happen again, and I'm hoping that both the public and the press understand the way that Trump plays this game.

@justredpillme - justredpillme

Links To Evidence: Archived Interview Segment Video (MP4): https://jrpm.me/4r6ojM

JustRedPillMe justredpill.me

@justredpillme - justredpillme

RedPill Rating: True

@justredpillme - justredpillme

Offsite Article Link: https://jrpm.me/qKFDoB

JustRedPillMe justredpill.me
joyreaper
Posted - August 15, 2023 at 12:09 PM
Saved - August 15, 2023 at 12:44 PM

@joyreaper - Joyreaper

@joyreaper - Joyreaper

Hillary Clinton was not a President. She stole, stored & destroyed classified documents illegally! James Comey testified that she broke the law and basically accused her of being stupid by implying she didn't know what she was doing. Why was she not indicted? Answer: We have a…

dom_lucre
Posted - August 15, 2023 at 10:44 PM
Saved - August 16, 2023 at 2:34 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Proof that prosecutors Fani Willis, Alvin Bragg, and Jack Smith are targeting Trump. Soros-backed attorneys funded by George Soros are prioritizing political opponents over criminals. Alvin Bragg indicted Trump without charges. Crime rates have risen under Bragg's tenure. Charges against Trump come from biased individuals. Jack Smith, a failed attorney, is also targeting Trump. Trump's charges are based on denying an election, while Democrats have done the same. Fani Willis has a history of targeting celebrities. Willis received far-left donations before prosecuting Trump. Both Willis and Smith have inconsistent legal careers. If every DA indicting Trump is compromised, it undermines their claims. Stay motivated.

@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

THREAD: Proof that DA Fani Willis, Alvin Bragg and Jack Smith will put Donald Trump in prison for the rest of his life.

@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

On January 22, 2023 It was revealed that George Soros invested over $40M on assisting Distract Attorneys in getting elected to target political opponents and lower the priority on criminal offenders. Soros has backed 75 prosecutors in total and 3 out of the 75 are targeting Trump

@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

Soros-backed progressives that for the first time in history, these prosecutors have become household names whether it be St. Louis Circuit Attorney Kim Gardner, Chicago’s Kim Foxx that helped Jussie Smollett, to New York’s Alvin Bragg that is targeting Trump while ignoring crime

@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

The Color of Change PAC, the “nation’s largest online racial justice organization”, which was given $1 million in May 2021 from George Soros, gave $1 million to Bragg but pulled back half of their donation later. Alvin Bragg promised “I will pursue Trump if I get elected.”

@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

On January 15, 2021, when Alvin Bragg was running for for DA reassuring his focus on convicting Donald Trump even though he currently had no charges, he utilized federal funds to indict Trump and the Manhattan crime rate has increased since 2021. Why would Soros fund him?

Video Transcript AI Summary
I have experience with Donald Trump as the chief deputy in the attorney general's office. We sued the Trump administration over 100 times for various issues like the Muslim travel ban, family separation at the border, and shenanigans with the census. I led the team that handled the Trump Foundation case. Holding Trump accountable is important, considering the lawlessness I've witnessed. There are two standards of justice, favoring rich, old white men like Harvey Weinstein, Jeffrey Epstein, and Trump. I've seen a pattern of lawlessness over 20 years, and I believe there's a path forward to make a case based on what I've seen in the public domain.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Whoever has this job, are they going to convict Donald Trump? I'm the candidate in the race who has the experience with with Donald Trump. I was the chief deputy in the attorney general's office. We sued the Trump administration over a 100 times, for the Muslim travel ban, for family separation at the border, For shenanigans with the census, so I know how to to litigate, with him. I also led the team that did the Trump Foundation case, So, I'm ready to go wherever the facts take me and to inherit that case, and I think, you know, it'd be hard to argue the fact that that's that'd be the most important, most high profile case. And I've seen him up front and seen the lawlessness that he can do. And you believe it should happen? You know, I I believe we have to hold them accountable. So So, yeah, the the they're they're You are right. We got a 2 standards of justice. You know, Harvey Weinstein, Jeffrey Epstein. Being a rich, old white man has allowed you to fade accountability In Manhattan. That includes Trump and his children. So I've seen a pattern of lawlessness over 20 years, and so I'm inclined to believe all I see in the public domain, and know that there's, I believe that there's a path forward there to make a case.

@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

“Alvin Bragg has been in office just a year, but Manhattan seems to be getting progressively worse in crime," said John Lott, president of the Crime Prevention Research Center. From 2021 to 2022, Manhattan's seven major felony offenses rose by 26% to the highest since 2006

@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

It appears that each charge against Trump comes from individuals with a vendetta against the President or seeking personal gain in exchange for ignoring the safety of their voters. President Trump appointed Donald Cochran on March 14, 2017. This position was held by Jack Smith.

@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

Jack Smith is known as a failed attorney here in Nashville Tennessee, it doesn’t surprise us that he decided to leave home to attack President Trump, if he couldn’t complete his duty in Tennessee what makes him qualified to attack a President? 🚨Click ALT in pics for sources

@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

With special council Jack Smith’s history with Trump and the GOP, in a fair world he would be considered a conflict of interest but we have entered a dystopian version of what America stands for, Jack Smith has over a decade of history undermining the GOP how would Trump differ?

@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

President Trump is currently being charged on the basis of denying an election, it was completely legal to deny an election until Trump rejected results, Trump had House Reps and Senate rejecting the election, in the 2016 and 2000 election Democrats only had House Reps reject.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers in the video repeatedly claim that the 2016 election was stolen and that Donald Trump is an illegitimate president. They accuse Russia of hacking the election and express concerns about the legitimacy of Trump's victory. They mention protests and violence that occurred after the election, with some protesters vandalizing property and clashing with police. The speakers also mention petitions and calls to overturn the election results. Overall, they express anger and disbelief at Trump's presidency and question the validity of the election.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It was a stolen election. It was stolen. Speaker 1: Stolen. He's an illegitimate president. He's an illegitimate president. Speaker 0: You know, pretending to be president. Why do you think the president is going to such great lengths to essentially prove that he beat you? Because he didn't. 1 third of Clinton supporters say Trump election is not legitimate? Speaker 2: I think Speaker 0: he's an illegitimate president that didn't really win. Speaker 1: You are absolutely right. You can run the best campaign. You can even become the nominee, and you can have the election stolen from Speaker 2: is you? Speaker 0: The 2016 election was stolen. Got a nicer way to say that? Say Russia hacks the election. Russia has hacked our election. Russia hacked our election. A little louder, please. Russia hacked our election. That was a 9/11 scale is Speaker 1: this was a kind of cyber 9/11? Cyber 9/11. Yeah. Speaker 0: Russia hacked our election. Russia, you know, of course, hacked our election here. Half of is can's voters believe the conspiracy theory that Russia hacked election day votes? Speaker 1: We know that they were into voting roles. Actual interference with the elections is in themselves? We know it happened. Speaker 0: Despite no credible evidence, 67% of Democrats believe Russia tampered with vote tally. Hacking is hacking the US election? Russia hacked our elections. The Russian hacked our election. Russia hacked our election. Russia hacked Speaker 2: our election. Russia hacked Speaker 0: our election. Russian hacking of our elections. Hacking of our is Of our election. Russia hacked our election. Russia hacked our elections. Stole an election. Russia hacked our election. Russia hacked our election. Universal assessment that Russia hacked our election in is a taxpayer? Foreign government. Act our elections. Most young Americans consider Donald Trump an illegitimate president. Illegitimate president. He's an illegitimate president. Why is still Trump? He just won an election. He is an illegitimate president in my mind. That's it. Speaker 2: I is Speaker 0: I absolutely agree. Experts urge Clinton Kent to challenge election results. Speaker 2: We will see Speaker 1: how illegitimate his victory actually was. He's an illegitimate president. Speaker 0: Is Russia hacked our election. Hacking our election. Hacked our election. Russia hacking our election. Speaker 2: I don't see the Speaker 0: president elect has a legitimate president. Trump is an legitimate president who stole the election? He is not a president. He's illegitimate. And my biggest fear is that he's gonna do it again with the help of Wadd, his best cow? Is Out terrified. Could you be my vice president for Canada's vote? Hillary Clinton voters call to overturn election results. More than 4,000,000 people have already is petition on change .org. Calling for the electors of the electoral college to, quote, ignore their states, vote, and cast their ballots for secretary Speaker 2: is Trump didn't actually Speaker 0: win the election in 2016. We are the victims of a bloodless coup. He didn't won the general election. Yo. Electoral is Hollies make Hillary Clinton president, period. Donald Trump is an illegitimate president. An illegitimate president. Don't accept is Trump as a legitimate president? Speaker 1: This wasn't on the level. This election was not on the level. Speaker 2: I don't Speaker 0: think he's a legitimate president. Our election wasn't legit. He got his victory is from cheating? Yes. Trump cheated. Trump cheated the 2016 election. He's an illegitimate president. No validity. No credibility. Mhmm. And because of that Anger at is What some see as an illegitimate president? Speaker 1: Stop that guy. Speaker 0: It will not be a peaceful change of power. A number of incidents turned violent. Protesters is hurled trash cans, flash bombs, and objects at police? Several officers injured. Protesters grew rocks and smashed windows, leading to more confrontations, injuries, and arrests. Is The chaotic scene just blocked outside the security of the inauguration. If denying election results is extreme now Yeah. Is Why don't So let's let's be really clear. That comparison that you made is just ridiculous. Protests against Donald Trump's election victory surged overnight, and is Some became violent. Violence erupted on the streets of Portland during the 2nd straight day of protests over the election of Donald Trump. Is Some protesters launched fireworks and other projectiles at police. Several people began vandalizing cars. Is Demonstrators smashed door windows. Protesters faced off with police in other cities too, including Oakland, Denver, and Minneapolis. Violent protests continuing now is Out for the 3rd day in a row, some 4,000 angry demonstrators over Trump's election victory taking to the street. Officers in front of thousands of protesters in what police call a Speaker 2: is setting fires, Speaker 0: taking their frustrations out on cars and buildings. Not my president. Speaker 2: Not my president. Speaker 0: Not my president. People threw projectiles at officers and is damaged property as well? I do it. Trash can't happen because I'm angry. Let's go. 1 woman driving through was is tact as someone used a bat to smash her windshield? They are undermining our democratic process, everything that we stand for.

@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

In 2018, Democrat Stacey Abrams claimed she lost her Georgia gubernatorial race due to voter "suppression." She refused to concede. 3 years later, she told CNN that her opponent "won under the rules of the game at the time, but the game was rigged against the voters of Georgia.

Video Transcript AI Summary
This election has tested our faith. Some have tried to take our voices away, scare us, and distract us. But if we stay focused, we can see the finish line. You have inspired me every day of this campaign. I know the sacrifices you made to vote and volunteer. You put your faith in me, and tonight, I want you to know that the feeling is mutual. When we trust the people of Georgia, we can achieve anything together. Georgia still has a decision to make between division and trickery or leadership that defends our rights, our children, our careers, our communities, and our right to vote. To all Georgia voters, welcome aboard, even if I wasn't your first choice. You'll have a chance to make a difference.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This election has tested our faith. Yeah. I'm not gonna name names, but some have worked hard to take our voices away, to scare us away, to distract us. But if our vision is clear, and we see the finish line. You you have inspired me every single day of this campaign. I know what you sacrificed to make your way to the polls, to volunteer after work or on lunch breaks. And I know that you put your faith in me. You'll do it again. Georgia, you put your faith in me, but I want you to know tonight, The feeling is mutual. And I want you to look around. Tonight should be all the proof you need That when we put our faith in the great people of the state, there is nothing we can't accomplish together. This This this fundamental truth is why we fight on, because Georgia still has a decision to make. A decision between division and trickery. Or a leadership that defends your rights, Your kids, your career, your community, and your right to vote in America. That's what's on the ballot. Now to all of Georgia's voters, including the 1,200,000 who haven't shown up before, welcome aboard. But I wanna say this, if I wasn't your first choice Or if you made no choice at all, you're gonna have a chance to do a do

@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

On January 6, 2001 several House Democrats voted against certifying the election results of 2000. Rep. Maxine Waters, D-Calif., said in a joint session: "The objection is in writing, and I do not care that it is not signed by a member of the Senate” Waters lead the floor in 2016.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Miss Waters from California rises to object to the fraudulent 25 Florida electoral votes. The objection is in writing but not signed by a senator. The chair advises that a senator's signature is required. Miss Waters mentions gross violations of the Voting Rights Act in Florida, but the objection is still not signed by a senator. The chair thanks Miss Waters but states that the objection may not be received based on the previously stated point of order.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: For what purpose, does the gentlewoman from California, miss Waters, arise? Speaker 1: Mister vice president, I rise To object to the fraudulent 25 Florida electoral votes. Speaker 0: Is the objection, in writing and Signed by a member of the house and a senator. Speaker 1: The objection is in writing, and I don't care that it is not it is not signed by a member of the senate. Speaker 0: The, the chair will advise that the rules do care and, the the signature of the senator The the signature of a Senator, is required. The chair will, again put that part of the question. Is the objection assigned by a senator? Speaker 1: Mister vice president, there are gross violations of the Voting Rights Act from Florida. Speaker 0: The gentleman the the gentleman Speaker 1: the act and it is not signed by a senator. Speaker 0: The chair thanks the gentlewoman from California on the basis previously stated the point of order may not be received.

@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

To decertify an election members of Senate and House has proceed with rejecting an election. Did you know that in the 2000 and 2016 election only House reps rejected the election? Strangely enough Rep. Maxine Waters lead the house floor for both objections. How is Trump wrong?

@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

Finally, DA Fani Taifa Willis had President Trump as a target for the last two years, she even began targeting rappers like Young Thug and YFN Lucci to increase her credibility prior to indicting Trump. She has a history of “clout chasing’ and sleeping with celebrities in Atlanta

@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

A source close to President Trump revealed a claim that DA Fani Williams who is trying to imprison Young Thug and Donald Trump is a conflict of interest due to allegedly having a sexual relationship with who the media claims to be Co-Founder of Young Thug’s YSL label, YSL Mondo.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses a woman named Fenny Willis, who used to be their lawyer but is now a prosecutor. They mention that Fenny Willis represented them in a previous case before becoming a district attorney. The speaker believes this is a conflict of interest and questions how Fenny Willis can now try to indict them. They suggest doing a live interview to provide evidence of their claims. The speaker also mentions that someone else, possibly Kaepernick, was interviewed and told the truth. They express their belief that God works in mysterious ways.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Lady who, the Fenny Winnie, Fenny, Willie's lady. Fenny Willis. Fenny Willie lady. That was just my lawyer. I got proven facts for this. Everybody this sounds I know everybody don't sing to you. Yeah. Fannie Willis, the the the the the d not the d. Is she the prosecutor? She's the Excuse me. VA lady. The DA. The DA was your was your attorney at one point in time. Yes. Just before she returned the beat. Wow. With the last case I just fought. I had just got out of jail. Yeah. For I had just got out of jail. The last case I just fought. I was last case she was doing before she turned to being the, DA. So she switched that. She was on defense and then she went This on Wow. Honest to god So this ain't this I don't nothing that this can be hid, people. No. Because I got the video on my page right here. Matter of fact, we should do this live interview right now to show you. So she represented you on a case right before this case that she is That's what I'm trying to tell Wow. That's the guy too. There ain't no Kaepernick. Somebody gonna when you did interview, they also when they oh, but he wasn't lying. This already dated. Come on, man. It's just how good. You know what I'm saying, bro? God working mysterious way. So you think that she tried use some of the things. You didn't listen to it. She can't. That's conflicting. That's that's like conflict of interest. You were just my lawyer. So how can you turn around and try to in in in in in in in indict a for no, sir. Like, you just might use my lawyer.

@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

Right before DA Fans Williams was elected she was flooded with far-left donations which is fairly strange when you consider how close the dates were with each contribution, it’s almost as if she was prepped to prosecute Young Thugg and President Trump. https://media.ethics.ga.gov/search/campaign/Campaign_ByContributions_RFR.aspx?NameID=28018&FilerID=C2020000305&CDRID=156252&Name=Willis,%20Fani%20Taifa&Year=2020&Report=6%20Days%20Before%20Primary%20Run-Off%20Election%20-%2008/11/2020

Campaign Reports Search | Georgia Government Campaign Finance Commission of Georgia Georgia State Ethics Commission. Find up-to-date information on the financing of political campaigns and lobbyist expenditures, contribution limits, and more. media.ethics.ga.gov

@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

Just like Jack Smith, prior to attacking Trump, DA Fani Willis has an legal inconsistent career, On June 4, 2021, Fani Williams was rescued rom case against Atlanta officer in Rayshard Brooks in a Wendy’s shooting. Williams begged twice to be removed prior to the judge accepting.

@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

DA Fani Williams begged to be removed from the case to ensure that she wouldn’t have to address the damage that her team created and to increase her chances to be eligible to indict Young Thug, YSL, YFN, and Lucci on Ricco charges which made her eligible to indict Trump on RICO

Video Transcript AI Summary
The murder case against Atlanta police officer Garrett Rolfe, who shot and killed Rayshard Brooks, is now without a prosecutor. Fulton County's new district attorney asked to be removed from the case, and a judge granted the request. The Georgia attorney general has been ordered to appoint a new prosecutor from outside the Fulton County District Office to take the case to trial. The DA's office was disqualified due to concerns over their handling of the case. The family of Rayshard Brooks hopes for a swift appointment of a new prosecutor. The attorneys for Rolfe are pleased with the decision and maintain that his use of force was justified. The second officer involved, Devin Brosnan, is still being prosecuted by the Fulton County DA's office.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And right now, the murder case against an Atlanta police officer is without a prosecutor. Fulton County's new district attorney asked to be removed from the case, and a judge is now allowing that. The officer, Garrett Rolfe, shot and killed Rayshard Brooks while trying to arrest him in a Wendy's parking lot on University Avenue. Speaker 1: And today's announcement, it means them. The case cannot move forward, not just yet. John Sharrock is live with what's gonna happen next. John? Tonight, the case that. Is in the hands of the Georgia attorney general. He's been ordered to step in and appoint a new prosecutor, someone from outside the Fulton County District them. Office to take this case to trial. We've seen the images repeatedly now. Miss Brooks? Them. Hey. I'm Oscar Rolfe with the Atlanta Police Department. How you doing? Atlanta police officer Garrett Rolfe introducing himself to Rayshard Brooks. It was June 12th the 2020. Brooks suspected of DUI. Rolfe about to handcuff Brooks. Suddenly, it all burst them. Another tragic confrontation between white officer and black suspect that in just a few seconds ended with Rolfe shooting Brooks to death. That. Was it a case of murder or self defense? Nearly a year later, no trial yet. Them. Instead, Fulton County Superior Court chief judge Christopher Brasher has granted the DA's wish to be disqualified from the case. That. The DA, Fonni Willis, said her office cannot be involved because her predecessor, Paul Howard the first charge is felony murder. Botched the case initially last summer them. Which Howard has denied. So judge Brasher removed the Fulton County DA's office, and now a new prosecutor from them. Side of Fulton County will be appointed and will start on it from scratch. And it hurt. It hurt really bad. The attorneys for Brooks' family Say they hope the new prosecutor will be appointed soon. The family of Rayshard Brooks has been through so much during this process. That. The numerous stops and starts have been gut wrenching and have made it even more difficult for this grieving family to find peace. That. The attorneys for Rolfe say they're glad the Fulton County DA's office is off the case. We welcome this order. We continue to maintain that that. Daroff's use of deadly force was legally justified, and we look forward to his complete exoneration. The state attorney general has not said yet when he will appoint the new prosecutor. As for the 2nd officer accused in this case, Devin Brosnan, them. He was not part of today's order from the judge. So apparently, as of now, the Fulton County DA's office is still responsible for prosecuting Brosnan them. On charges that include aggravated assault. Speaker 0: Alright. John Sherrick, lots of layers to that story. Thank you so much.

@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

If every DA indicting President Trump is compromised and if Democrats were able to use politicians, celebrities, and every type of media they owned to accuse President Trump of stealing the 2016 election with Russia it will hurt their witching in discovery. Stay motivated!

@dom_lucre - Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

I want to thank everyone for their support and most importantly believing in me, your trust is everything. For everyone looking for all of my THREADS or donation info, I will add the link below. THANK YOU FOR EVERYTHING. I can't express how much I love you https://www.creditcadabra.com/dom-lucre-twitter-thread-collection/

Dom Lucre Twitter Thread Collection You requested it, here it is! Here are all of my threads and donation info, thank you so much for pushing me and holding me accountable. All of your ti creditcadabra.com
atensnut
Posted - September 25, 2023 at 4:40 AM
Saved - September 25, 2023 at 2:20 PM

@atensnut - Juanita Broaddrick

Hillary says there was Russia interference 2016 and will be again in 2024. Why did they skip 2020… you evil witch?

Video Transcript AI Summary
Vladimir Putin's interference in our past election is a topic we don't discuss often. However, it is important to acknowledge that he has meddled in various ways, such as funding political parties, candidates, and bribing government officials in different countries. This is his modus operandi, as he despises democracy, particularly in the West, and holds a strong animosity towards us. Looking ahead to 2024, it is crucial to address this issue and have more conversations about it.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Vladimir Putin, has obviously your friend your friend and mine. Indeed. He has, intervened in our election in the past. Right. It's not something, as you experienced firsthand, it's not something we talk about a lot. Do you fear that that is something that could be happening for 2024? Speaker 1: And do you think we should be talking about it more? Well, I think we should be talking about it more because I don't think despite all of the deniers, there's any doubt that he interfered in our election or that he has interfered in many ways in the internal affairs of other countries, funding political parties, funding Political candidates buying off government officials in different places. So that is his opus, his opus operandi in the sense that he hates democracy. He particularly hates the West, And he especially hates us. And he has determined that he can do 2
listen_2learn
Posted - December 25, 2023 at 3:34 AM
Saved - December 25, 2023 at 10:15 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Many so-called "experts" claimed by November 16, 2020, that there was no evidence of computer fraud in the election, but I question their credibility. These partisan individuals seem to be involved in a cover-up and should be held accountable. Their actions only contribute to the erosion of trust in experts. Similar to the experts who dismissed Hunter Biden's laptop as Russian disinformation, it's difficult to believe anything they say in the future.

@listen_2learn - The Researcher

Can someone tell me how all of these supposed “experts” knew by November 16, 2020, that there was no evidence of computer fraud in the election? They didn’t. They are simply partisan hacks that were part of the cover-up. They should be named and shamed. https://t.co/iQTYg1mGMN

@listen_2learn - The Researcher

These dummies demean themselves and cause more and more people to lose trust in any “expert” due to stunts like this.

@listen_2learn - The Researcher

It’s like the “experts” that said that Hunter Biden’s laptop was Russian disinformation. Why would any thinking person believe anything they say going forward? https://t.co/Y0pZhjfJ4u

VDHanson
Posted - January 1, 2024 at 3:31 AM
Saved - January 3, 2024 at 12:50 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Maine Secretary of State Shenna Bellows removed Trump's name from the primary ballot, accusing him of "insurrection" without any legal basis. This sets a dangerous precedent for future elections. Hillary Clinton's involvement in the 2016 election, hiring a foreign national to create a dossier against Trump, raises questions about her own eligibility. Clinton and her associates worked to undermine Trump's presidency, even after the special counsel found no collusion. Clinton's claims of election theft and rigging set the stage for the 2020 election.

@VDHanson - Victor Davis Hanson

Who Are the Real Insurrectionaries? Part One Maine Secretary of State Shenna Bellows just ordered Trump’s name removed from the primary ballot in May. She claimed he is guilty in her view of “insurrection”—a crime Trump has never been charged with, much less convicted of. Her evidence, mostly gleaned from popular news accounts and video reports, would not stand up in a court of law. Bellows has no law degree. She was appointed by a majority vote of the Democratic-controlled Maine legislature, not through a popular ballot. Her legal expertise seems to be derived from years of political activism with the ACLU. We can see where the ultimate trajectory of this usurpation is going—once a single official decides to remove the leading primary and general election candidate of the opposition from the ballot by fiat. Tit-for-tat will likely follow and would unwind the republic. Take Bellows’ action and then apply it to any future candidacy of Hillary Clinton. And by these new rules she surely would fail to qualify to have her name on a state ballot. Remember, in 2016 Hillary Clinton illegally hired a foreign national (by law forbidden to work in presidential campaigns), Christopher Steele, to create a “dossier” of smears and fake-news accounts, aimed at destroying her presidential opponent Donald Trump by extra-legal means. Clinton hid her illicit payments to Steele behind the paywalls of the DNC, the Perkins-Coie law firm, and Fusion GPS. Her leftwing associates and partisans in the waning Obama administration, the DOJ, State Department, FBI, and CIA worked hard to brand the slurs as credible, as they variously passed them off and leaked to the media on the eve of the election. They and Democrats in congress later engineered the appointment of a special counsel, whose investigations consumed two years of the Trump administration’s term, before finding no “collusion”. Even three years after the election in 2019 and the special counsel’s findings, Clinton could still persist that Trump was an “illegitimate” president: “He knows he’s an illegitimate president”. She also declared that year that the 2016 election had been “stolen”: “I think it’s also critical to understand that, as I’ve been telling candidates who have come to see me, you can run the best campaign, you can even become the nominee, and you can have the election stolen from you”—de facto asserting the balloting was fraudulent. She was prepping the battlefield for 2020. So Clinton continued her denialism right up to the eve of the 2020 election, further claiming the 2016 election was rigged, “There was a widespread understanding that this election [in 2016] was not on the level.” To be continued…

ICU1010
Posted - January 24, 2024 at 2:32 PM
Saved - January 24, 2024 at 8:11 PM

@ICU1010 - Eddie

@HillaryClinton Here are 20+ minutes of Democrats denying and questioning election results. Hillary Clinton, Obama, Biden, et al., with many calling President Trump illegitimate. The 2020 election was rigged, and Biden is illegitimate!! https://t.co/wu8Bt5WVgO

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers in the video discuss their belief that various elections, including the 2016 and 2020 presidential elections, were stolen or illegitimate due to factors such as Russian interference, voter suppression, and faulty voting machines. They express concerns about the integrity of the electoral process and call for reforms to ensure fair elections. The video also mentions specific instances, such as the 2000 presidential election and the Georgia gubernatorial race, where the speakers believe the election results were not accurate. Overall, the speakers emphasize the need for transparency and accountability in elections to protect democracy.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You can run the best campaign. You can even become the nominee, and you can have the election stolen from you. Speaker 1: How can you win with Russian interference, though? Speaker 2: That's what real scared about it in 2020. But rightly. Speaker 1: Because I'm thinking illegitimate president that didn't really win. So how do you, you know, fight against that in 2020? Speaker 2: You are absolutely right. Speaker 0: He is an illegitimate president in my mind Speaker 3: Could you be my vice president to a candidate? Speaker 4: Folks, look. I absolutely agree. Speaker 5: Trump didn't actually win the election in 2 16. He lost the election, and he was put in the office because the Russians interfered. Speaker 6: Russia interfered with our election, attacked our democracy for the sole purpose of artificially placing someone at 1600 Pennsylvania knew they were successful. Speaker 0: Trump knows he's an illegitimate president. Speaker 7: The president or elect, although legally elected, is not legitimate. Speaker 8: I don't see Speaker 9: this. President-elect as a legitimate president. You said you believe that Russia's interference altered the outcome of the auction. Speaker 2: I do. We have a president who, if in fact, it is proven, has been assisted by the Russians and may in fact not be a legitimate president. Speaker 0: The one thing that Trump It's fearful of, when it comes to his being president, is that finally, we will see how illegitimate his victory actually Was. Speaker 10: I have an objection. Speaker 11: I object to the 15 votes from the state of North Carolina. Speaker 12: I object because people are horrified. Speaker 0: He's an illegitimate president. Speaker 13: Our election was hijacked. There is no question. Congress has a duty to hashtag protect our democracy and hashtag follow the facts. Speaker 6: John Lewis is completely right. There is a cloud out of illegitimacy around the election of Donald Trump. The Russians interfered with his election. James Comey and the FBI interfered with his, election. The fake news industry interfered with his election. Speaker 0: Trump knows he's an illegitimate president who got illegitimate foreign powers. Speaker 2: Do you believe Trump is illegitimate president? Speaker 14: What I believe is that there's no question that the outcome of this election was affected by the Russian interference. Speaker 15: There absolutely is a cloud of illegitimacy. Speaker 16: So that legitimacy is in question. Yes. Speaker 7: So that was a very tainted election. And and in that sense, it's it's illegitimate. Speaker 2: Why do you think the president is going to such great lengths to prove that he beat you. Speaker 0: Because he knows he didn't. He knows he's an illegitimate president. Speaker 13: Stolen emails. Stolen drone. Stolen drone. Own an election. Welcome to the world of unprecedented Trump. Speaker 9: Did you believe president Trump is an illegitimate president? Speaker 5: Based on what I just said, which I can't retract. Speaker 13: Okay. He tweeted in Tory, 2018, quote, the more we learn about the 2016 election, the more illegitimate it becomes. America deserves to know whether we have a fake president in the Oval Office. Speaker 7: In the Russian attempt to to have the election. And, frankly, the FBI is weighing in on the election. I think make the make it Makes this election illegitimate. Speaker 0: There was a widespread understanding that this election was not on the level. We still don't know what really happened, Isaac. I mean, there's just a lot that I think will be revealed. History will discover. But you don't win by 3,000,000 votes and have all this other shenanigans stuff going on and not come away with an idea like, woah. Something's not right here. Speaker 6: Seems to me that there's a cloud of illegitimacy that continues to hang over 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. Speaker 14: The outcome of the election was affected by their interference. And now we need to know, you know, to what degree, if any, the campaign was actually in collusion with the with with Russia. Speaker 0: He knows he's an illegitimate president. So, of course, he's obsessed with me, and I believe that it's a guilty conscience. Speaker 4: We actually won the last presidential election, folks. They stole my presidential election. Speaker 3: If Al Gore won that election, think he won anyway. Speaker 4: Actually, I think I carried Florida. Speaker 5: Al Gore won the election nationwide and also in Florida, but the supreme court ruled the other way. Al Gore got more votes, but not enough to stay out of the Supreme Court where president Bush was elected 5 to 4. Speaker 0: Bush versus Gore. A court took away A presidency. Speaker 17: If all the votes were carried in Florida, that Al Gore would be president today and George Bush would be backing off. Speaker 2: I come from Florida Where you and others participated in what I call the United States coup d'etat. Speaker 13: It's in 2013, according to reports, vice president Joe Biden, he claimed that Al Gore was the one who was elected president, and he claimed that the recount result was, quote, a bad decision. Speaker 4: And never forget, dear friends, what they did in Florida to Al Gore and me, to all of us, the older Americans, the African Americans, the Haitian Americans denied the right to vote and have those votes counted. Speaker 18: I do believe that the projections were right in the first place at 7 o'clock when they called it Boy. Speaker 2: Let me tell you something without a doubt. George Bush did not carry Florida, and it was not closed. Speaker 8: There's no question You won the state of Florida. Speaker 4: Oh, thank you, darling. No. That's a question. Speaker 17: That's a question. Speaker 4: We will never know because votes weren't weren't counted. But by And Speaker 13: and then in your judgment Speaker 4: I mean, that's unfortunate. Yeah. And there is no other way of saying it, but to be very blunt, Al Gore won the state of Florida in 2000, and we should never forget it. Speaker 19: Most Americans are great. Many Americans don't have confidence that the election of 2000 was fair. Speaker 18: But I don't believe we lost. I I believe we just failed to have all of the votes counted. The Coach counted The Speaker 14: Supreme Court elected president of 2004. Yeah. Al Gore won the state of Florida in 2000, although not the presidency. Speaker 20: We know we won this election. They know we won on this election, and Americans know we won this election. Speaker 18: I know some people want you to believe that the Gore campaign was a campaign that wasn't able to complete its mission. We did. Had all of those votes been found in Florida, I think Al Gore would be president today. Speaker 21: We had more votes. We won, and we are never Going to let the United States Supreme Court choose the president of the United States again. Speaker 14: You should Speaker 12: know by now based the fact that he lost the popular vote vote by more than a half 1000000 voters, and we don't know how many he lost by in Florida. Speaker 5: There's no doubt in my mind that Al Gore was elected president. Speaker 12: I rise to object to the fraudulent 25 Florida electoral Folks. Speaker 17: Really, we won the election in 2000, but they stole the election. Speaker 4: I must object because of the overwhelming evidence of official misconduct, Delivery fraud and an attempt to The chairman must remain on. Enron had already helped the Bush team with such favors as ferrying their rent a mob to Florida in 2000 to permanently halt the counting of legally cast ballots. Speaker 11: It is signed by myself behalf of my diverse constituents and the millions of Americans who have been disenfranchised by Florida's inaccurate vote count to The court, not Speaker 16: the week Speaker 12: with the United States, the Friday of this election. Speaker 2: Speaking to a Democratic Speaker 22: group in Chicago Tuesday, he Speaker 2: made it clear He thinks Al Gore was the winner. Speaker 16: By the time it was over, Speaker 5: our candidate had won the popular vote, and the only way they could win the election was to stop The voting in Florida. Speaker 17: Catherine Harris, Jeb Bush, Jim Baker, and the Supreme Court hadn't tampered Speaker 4: with the results. Al Gore would be president. Speaker 23: I think that the issue before us today, is Not who won or should have won the 2000 presidential election. That issue has been settled, not to my belief, but it has been settled. Speaker 13: Let's just drop the vice. President, presidentor. That's all I got. Speaker 9: Al Gore should Speaker 13: have been president of the United States. Speaker 24: Al Gore, made it possible for George Bush to be the only appointed president in the history of these United States. Speaker 13: Democrats have won the past 3 presidential elections. Speaker 19: In 2000, unions turned out 25% of the vote, and Al Gore won. Speaker 17: But the Supreme Court hampered? That's a large start. The Supreme Court stopped the counting of the votes, and if they'd let the council on, El Gore would have got the necessary vote. Speaker 2: The Supreme Court selected George w Bush as the president. He was not elected. Speaker 12: There is overwhelming But it said Joyce w Bush did not win this election. Speaker 25: What I observed, as a voter, as a citizen of Illinois, 4 years ago were troubling evidence of the fact that not every vote was being counted. Speaker 5: Don't think that George w Bush won the election, in 2000, I guess, our goal because I I think that he probably lost Florida and also that nationwide. Speaker 17: If you invite me back on this show in about 8 weeks, I think you're gonna learn that El Goran actually did get all the votes there. Speaker 26: I felt what happened in Florida was a carefully worked out conspiracy. That many things could not go wrong in 1 one state without there having been a conspiracy, and many, many different things did go wrong. Many Tricks were full of various kinds. Speaker 18: The vice president did win, but, and I do believe that the majority of voters that intended to to go to Polls last year wanted to vote and cast their votes for Al Gore. I do believe that in in in terms of Florida as well. Speaker 19: The has been Speaker 10: thwarting formation of the popular will. The most spectacular example being Bush versus Gore, where the majority by a 5 four vote and joined the counting of more than a 100,000 ballots in Florida and essentially gave America its first court appointed president. Speaker 13: And stolen. Speaker 27: Even though Al Gore won the election, he won't take office. Speaker 25: That election was stolen from the rightful winner. So, mister speaker, I'm here today to talk about a stolen presidential election. Speaker 17: I think in 2000, everybody So, well, he did win the election out of court. Speaker 15: He started dividing America here in Florida By trying to take an election that I think any reasonable person would say he hadn't actually won. Speaker 2: What happened in Florida will go down in history as a coup d'etat. Speaker 16: Did we conclude, is it possible that There was a conspiracy, and Florida officials were involved in the conspiracy. Never have so many things gone so wrong one place before. Why how do all these things happen all at the same time in the same state? It's not possible there was a conspiracy. It was very well organized. Why were the state police out there on that day, election day, taking license plates, And and so forth. You know, how did all these things happen in one state at one time in one election? Is is it possible that we are Use the word conspiracy and not be afraid of it. Not sure wish, Gore was president right now. He should be. Speaker 17: Well, yes, he got elected. Speaker 16: Oh, well, good. Speaker 28: A battle that by the will of the people should have ended in victory. But tens of thousands of Florida votes either were not counted or tossed out in the 2000 presidential election. Speaker 17: 5 supreme court justices, This is Trump the votes of 51,000,000 Americans. We should've let the entire state be recounted so it was clear, that Al Gore actually won the state Speaker 2: And won the election. Speaker 23: We had the election stolen from us, and you must admit that. They stole it, and we need a leader to help us get revenge. Speaker 13: I voted for Al Gore. He won the election. Speaker 26: They usurped the The powers of the forest being caught and and and intervene, it was a fix as far as we're concerned. You know? It it there's no polite way to talk about it except the fix was in. Speaker 2: After the when you stole the election, you came back here and say, get over it. No. We're not going to get over it. Speaker 4: You know it. I know know it. They know it. We won that election. Speaker 22: Constantly shifting vote tallies in Ohio and now functioning electronic machines, which may not have paper receipts, have led to additional loss of confidence by the public. Speaker 6: The right to vote Speaker 4: has been stolen from qualified voters. Speaker 13: The New Yorker reported that Kerry thought that, quote, proxies for Bush had rigged of the voting machines. Speaker 12: In 2004, the democratic process was thwarted. Speaker 5: The 2004 presidential election in Ohio was riddled with unnecessary problems. Speaker 29: Some machines malfunctioned, causing votes to be counted more than once or not at all. Speaker 30: Based upon an inordinate number of allegations Suggesting gross voting rights violations and misconduct, I join with my colleagues in objective to counting the state of Ohio's electoral votes. Speaker 31: Nas in 2000, the votes of many who wanted to vote were not, in fact, counted. Speaker 32: This last Friday night, I I arranged to meet senator Kerry at Fundraiser to give him a copy of my book. He told me he now thinks the election was stolen. Speaker 2: The wife of John Kerry said she has Lingering doubts about the legitimacy of the election. Her theory goes like this. 2 brothers, she calls hard right Republicans, Own 80% of loading machines in the US. Therefore, it would be easy to hack into the mother machines that control the electronic voting. There were numerous irregularities in Ohio, including large percentages of rejections of provisional balloting, problems with voting machines. Speaker 0: As we look At our election system, I think it's fair to say that there are many legitimate questions about its accuracy, About its integrity Speaker 22: There are still legitimate concerns over the integrity of our elections. Speaker 8: The question obviously is How many instances were not caught that we don't know about? Number 1, we've seen a lot of what I'll call honest glitches where it just didn't work right, But also that these machines are hackable. A dishonest employee of the vendor or a dishonest employee of a local board of elections or simply someone who knows electronics and has Computer at home, could hack into these machines and then put in a secret instruction to disregard every 20th democratic voter at 10 percent to the carrier to the Bush vote or whatever, you might not even know it. Speaker 4: I agree with tens of millions of Americans who are very worried that when they cast the ballot on Speaker 33: an electronic voting machine that there is no paper trail to record that vote. The numerous irregularities That occurred with the electronic voting machines in Ohio on November 2nd last year point to an unresolved of national crisis. Speaker 11: We cannot declare that the election of November 2, 2004 was free and clear and transparent and real. There must be independent testing the voting machines used in Speaker 0: Ohio. I'm not confident that the election in Ohio was fairly decided. We know that there was substantial voter suppression, And the machines were not reliable. Speaker 22: The members of congress who have brought this challenge are speaking up for their aggrieved constituents, many of whom may have been disenfranchised in this process. Speaker 31: Treating today's electoral vote count in congress as a meaningless ritual would be an insult to our unless we registered our own protest against the obviously flawed voting process that took place in so many of our states. Speaker 34: Voters who wish to cast a vote Vote for president or vice president can't approach the polls with certainty that their vote will be Counting. Speaker 27: One of the most significant problems in Ohio and in many other states was the lack of measures to ensure the integrity of electronic voting machines. Speaker 19: In 2004, they caused Democratic voters in Ohio to wait for 8 hours before they could cast their Ballot. They turn the Department of Civil Rights and the Justice Department into the voter suppression division with voter ID laws, voter purging, voter caging, voter intimidation. There aren't gonna be any more election stealing. Speaker 2: Now you have one very affirmative statement to make. Speaker 23: We won. Speaker 2: But I didn't lose. I got the votes, but we won't know exactly how many because how they cheated. I did win my election. I just didn't get to have We were robbed of an election. Without voter suppression, Stacey Abrams would be the governor of Georgia. Andrew Gillum is the governor of Florida. Speaker 29: Using the word rigged, Using the word steal, do you think it's dangerous going into 2020? Speaker 2: I I don't because we can actually back it up. And so in response to what I believe Well, it's stolen election. I'm not saying they stole it from me. They stole it from the door. Speaker 29: Back to the Speaker 2: outside asking if I'm ever gonna concede. The answer is no. Speaker 0: If she had a fair election, she already would have won. Speaker 2: This is not a speech of concession. Because concession needs to acknowledge an action that's Right, true, or prop. And I will not concede because the erosion of our democracy is not right. You refuse to concede and say that you lost. Do you stand by that decision today? Absolutely. Speaker 5: If Stacey Abrams doesn't win in Georgia, they stole it. It's clear. It's clear. Speaker 2: It was not a free and fair election. I think the election was stolen from the people of Georgia. I believe it was stolen from the voters. Speaker 25: So I think that Stacey Abrams' election is being stolen from her. Speaker 2: The election was not fair. The process was not Fair. Thousands of Georgians had their voices stolen because they were not able to cast ballots, and they cannot be guaranteed that their votes will be counted in 2020, if we don't do this right. Speaker 29: If what happens to you happens nationally and we we see, whoever runs for whoever wins the Democratic nominee, if they They actually I can prove that there's a number of votes in every state that that and that and that's the same thing that you just described happens in multiple states. Should they concede? Speaker 2: I do not think we should concede an election until we know the results of an election. I still fundamentally believe it could be a failure, And that's just not how life works. If it looks like it's cheating, it probably is. If it looks like it's rigged, it probably Speaker 4: She would be the governor of Georgia today had the governor of Georgia not disenfranchise 1,400,000 Georgia voters before the election. That's what happened to Stacey Abrams. They took the vote away. Speaker 2: We've been raised to believe that it is in that respect to Speaker 16: call Speaker 35: You, notably did not concede. Speaker 2: I did not. Speaker 35: Okay. You acknowledged That he won, but you did not concede. Correct. 5 months later, do you still feel like your opponent won through voter suppression? Speaker 2: Yes. Speaker 13: Reminder, she wrote, Brian Kemp stole the gubernatorial election from Georgians and Stacey Abrams. Speaker 2: I said that the election was stolen from Georgia voters. The Process that took place during the legislative cycle was one that did not countenance and did not pay attention to the deep and real concerns of those Who watched this election be stolen in the state of Georgia? It was stolen from the voters of Georgia. Georgia voters did not have their votes counted. They were not allowed to cast votes. They had their votes Scarded. Speaker 36: It certainly gave the appearance of unfairness. I think it was, unfair. Stacy ran a great campaign. She probably won. Speaker 2: And it was not fair to those who filled up absentee ballots. And depending on the county you sent it to, it either was counted or not counted, assuming you received it in time. Brian Kemp oversaw for 8 years the systematic and systemic dismantling of our democracy, and that means there could not be free and fair elections in Georgia. As long as we have eligible American citizens who cannot cast a ballot, then the game is rigged. I am complicit if I say that that system fair. Concession in the political space is an acknowledgment that the process was fair, and I don't believe that to be so. But I refuse to concede because concession means that the process was proper, that the result was true and right, and I cannot say that. If I tend to say I didn't lose, I just didn't win. And I don't call it a loss. I just didn't win. Right. Right. Yes. You did. Okay. Officially. Yes. Eventually. Put it this way. I didn't get to get inaugurated, and that's possible. Okay. But will I say that this election was not tainted, was not and a disenfranchisement of thousands of voters, I will not say that. Speaker 0: Candidates, both black and white, lost their races because they have been deprived of the votes they otherwise would have gotten. And the clearest Example is from next door in Georgia. Stacey Abrams should be governor leading that state right now. Speaker 2: I was joking with Beth backstage when Cliff said, you know, she lost. I'm like, no. I just didn't win, because we don't know what really happened because of the miasma of voter suppression. I can't know for a fact that I would be the governor of Georgia but for the malfeasance and the mismanagement It's Brian Kemp, but I know it's a pretty good guess. So I can't prove that I would have won, but I know we don't know because of how he behaved. Speaker 9: Is he the legitimate governor elect him towards me. Speaker 2: He is the person who won an adequate number of votes But that's not from the governor. Speaker 9: With all with all due respect, and I respect where you're coming from, and I respect The the issues that you're raising, you're not answering the question. Do you think it was Speaker 2: Wait a minute. No. I what I'm talking to you Speaker 9: You're not using the word legitimate. Is he the legitimate governor Like, Georgia. Speaker 2: He is the legal governor of Georgia. See, I'm here to tell you that just because you win doesn't mean you're won. They said to me that you did not lose. You just did not win. Yes. So we're gonna talk about that. Bad news is that we didn't get the victory we secured. And the thing is we will never know empirically that I got more votes because because we will never know which votes didn't count. This was not fair. It was not right, and it is deeply improper that Someone could ascend to that role having performed so basely and so crassly against the very people he is now supposed to represent. The election was not fair. The process was not fair. So you don't feel that you lost fair Speaker 8: and square? Speaker 2: I do recognize I am not the governor of Georgia, but I do like to point out something that is true for me and for many in our state, And that is we won. Speaker 3: I'm not saying it's gonna be legit. It's the increase in the prospect of being illegitimate is a direct proportion of us not being able to get These these reforms passed. Speaker 0: Right wing extremists already have a plan to literally steal the next presidential Election. Speaker 25: It's not as if it's just Republicans who have monkeed around with elections in the past, sometimes Democrats have to. You know, whenever people are in power, They're you know, they have this tendency to try to, you know, tilt things in their direction.
itsEFlyX
Posted - March 21, 2024 at 12:50 PM
Saved - March 22, 2024 at 12:38 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
President Joe Biden's past racially insensitive comments are being ignored by mainstream media. There are concerns about the lack of real news coverage.

@itsEFlyX - 𝐄𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐧 (𝐗)

🚨 WATCH: President Joe Biden's past features racially insensitive comments, yet mainstream media opt to turn a blind eye. Question is, when does the real news coverage start? **Please Like/Repost to Amplify Awareness

Video Transcript AI Summary
Biden made controversial statements about race, segregationists, and minorities. He faced criticism for his past remarks and actions, including his involvement in the crime bill leading to mass incarceration. Hunter Biden's use of racial slurs and lies about civil rights involvement were also highlighted. Biden's opposition to school busing for integration and his collaboration with segregationists raised concerns. Overall, his statements and actions regarding race and civil rights have been scrutinized and criticized.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm not telling you, if you have a problem figuring out whether you're for me or Trump, then you ain't black. Poor kids are just as bright and just as talented as white kids. When you got the first sorta mainstream American American Yes. Who is articulate and bright and and clean, nice looking guy. Biden recalling Speaker 1: his early senate career, bringing up 2 segregationist senators, Herman Talmadge and James Eastland, who called African Americans an inferior race. I was in a caucus with James o Eastland, Biden said. He never called me boy. He always called me son. At least there was some civility. We got things done. Speaker 2: The senators that he is speaking of with such adoration are individuals who made and built their reputation on segregation. The Ku Klux Klan celebrated the election of 1 of them. Speaker 3: Using the word boy in the way he did, can cause hurt and pain, and we need a presidential nominee and the leader of our party to be sensitive to that. Speaker 0: My democratic colleagues don't like me saying this. I think the 2 party system is good for the south and good for the Negro, good for the black. Other than the fact that they still call me boy, I don't think they've I think they've changed their mind. There's also no to Robert c Byrd was a parliamentary library, a keeper of the institution of the senate, and he was the institution itself. For a lot of us, he was a friend. He was a mentor, and he was a guy. Speaker 4: 1987, he bragged about getting an award from George Wallace. Speaker 5: Biden bragged about an award from the notorious segregationist governor George Wallace and told the Philadelphia Inquirer, I think the Democratic party could stand a liberal George Wallace, someone who's not afraid to stand up and offend people. Speaker 0: You cannot go Speaker 6: to a 711 Speaker 0: or a Dunkin' Donuts unless you have a slight Indian accent. Unlike the African American community with notable exceptions, the Latino community is an incredibly diverse community with incredibly different attitudes about different things. They're gonna put y'all back in chains. Speaker 7: Biden was remarking to an audience in South Virginia that included hundreds of black voters. Speaker 0: And Haiti just quietly sunk into the Caribbean or rose up 300 feet. It wouldn't matter a whole lot. The reason I was able to stay sequestered in my home is because some black woman was able to stack the grocery shelf. Speaker 8: One thing Biden is being slammed for is the crime bill he helped write 25 years ago that many critics say resulted in mass incarceration, especially of young African American men. Speaker 0: Unless we do something about that cadre of young people, tens of thousands of them, born out of wedlock, without parents, without supervision, without any structure, without any conscience developing. Speaker 2: It did contribute to mass incarceration in our country. Speaker 0: There's about a 100,000 of them if you wanna be rhetorically, extreme about it that are the who are the predators. Speaker 9: They are beyond the pale, many of those people. We have no choice but to take them out of society. Speaker 0: It's awful hard as well to get Latinx vaccinated as well. Why? They're worried that they'll be vaccinated and deported. Because I was 29. I'm like the token black or the token woman. I was the token young person. Even call centers was rushed overseas in the hundreds of thousands. How many times do you get to call? I'd like to talk to you about your credit card. Again, you have to start off with what they start off with. There's less than 1% of the population of of Iowa that is, African American. There is probably less than, 4 or 5% of that is, are minorities. What what is in Washington? Speaker 7: I don't know. Speaker 6: I think it's a vast majority. Speaker 0: Yeah. So look, it goes back to what you start off with, what you're dealing with. If you were, you know, the emperor right now, you you're running the show, What are the things that you would do Lee Kuan Yew, who most foreign policy experts around the world say is the most the wisest man in the orient. Speaker 10: Hunter once re refused a date because of his own Asian hate. In the 2019 exchange, his cousin Carolyn offers to set him up with one of her friends to which Hunter replied, no yellow. Speaker 0: But I there's one more band member that I want you to meet. Ladies and gentlemen, our vocalist tonight, Michael Jackson. Michael, would you please stand? Speaker 7: First son Hunter Biden repeatedly called his white attorney the n word. Speaker 0: He's a grown man. He is the smartest man I know. Speaker 7: Hunter Biden reportedly wrote to his attorney, quote, how much money do I owe you because, n word, you better not be charging me Hennessy rates. In another message, Biden began a text to his attorney with o m g n word, and Biden responded at one point with true that n word. Speaker 6: He lied to voters according to the New York Times, quoting aids of of Biden's about having marched in the civil rights movement. Speaker 0: And I got involved in the civil rights movement, just as a kid. I came out of the civil rights movement. I was one of those guys that sat in and marched and all Speaker 6: that stuff. And The New York Times reports, quote, more than once, advisers had gently reminded mister Biden of the problem with this formulation. He had not actually marched during the civil rights movement. And more than once, mister Biden assured them that he understood and kept telling the story anyway. That is really, really weird. Speaker 11: The Washington Post has given president Biden, 4 Pinocchios. Liar, liar, liar, liar. It's how I describe it. For claiming he was arrested as a teenager while attending a civil rights protest in Delaware. They write, quote, the primary source for this story is Biden. We've learned over the years that he's not always a reliable source. Speaker 4: One chapter receiving fresh scrutiny comes from his earliest years in the senate when he strongly opposed mandatory school busing. It was designed to achieve integration and a more equitable education. What's less known is how he followed the lead of some of the senate's most fervent segregationists. Speaker 2: Working with segregationists on an anti bussing agenda is very, very scary. Speaker 12: 1977, Biden worried that his children would grow up in a, quote, racial, his words, jungle if integration is not done in a, quote, orderly way, whatever that means. Speaker 4: On March 25, 1977, Biden wrote, my bill strikes at the heart of the injustice of court ordered busing. It prohibits federal courts from disrupting our educational system. Biden sought and received support from Mississippi senator James Eastland, the democratic chairman of the judiciary committee, and a leading symbol of southern resistance to desegregation. Speaker 0: I think the concept of busing, which implicit in that concept is the question you just asked or the statement within the question you just asked that we are going to integrate people so that they all have the same access and they learn to grow up with one another and and all the rest is a rejection of the whole movement of black pride, is a rejection of the entire black awareness concept where black is beautiful, black culture should be studied, and a cultural awareness of the importance of their own identity, their own individuality. And I think that's a healthy, solid proposal.

@itsEFlyX - 𝐄𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐧 (𝐗)

https://t.co/BfUOtGIdsU

@itsEFlyX - 𝐄𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐧 (𝐗)

Proof Attached: **Please Repost/Like To Increase Visibility https://t.co/1uVfbHP91V

Video Transcript AI Summary
If caught with a small amount of crack cocaine, you face 5 years in jail with no probation. The government can seize all your assets under forfeiture laws. We must isolate criminals from society, regardless of their reasons. They need to be removed from the streets.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If you have a piece of crack cocaine, no bigger than this quarter that I'm holding in my hand, 1 quarter of $1. We passed the law through the leadership of senator Thurman and myself and others, a law that says you're caught with that, you go to jail for 5 years. You get no probation. You get nothing other than 5 years in jail. Judge doesn't have a choice. Under our forfeiture statutes, you can, the government can take everything you own, everything from your car to your house, your bank account, not merely what they confiscate in terms of the dollars from the transaction that you just got caught engaging in. They can take everything. I don't care why they become a sociopath. We have an obligation to cordon them off from the rest of society. They are in jail away from my mother, your husband, our families. So I don't wanna ask what made them do this. They must be taken off the street.

@itsEFlyX - 𝐄𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐧 (𝐗)

https://t.co/a7A6SZwbca

@itsEFlyX - 𝐄𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐧 (𝐗)

🚨 WATCH: President Joe Biden engages in a heated exchange with a citizen, accusing him of lying and resorting to profanity in the process. The clip referenced by the voter is a viral video where Biden discusses potentially stripping away 2A rights from the American public. **Please Like/Repost to Amplify Awareness

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker was asked about winning the union vote despite gun enthusiasts in the union. They denied taking away guns but were interrupted. The speaker clarified they did not say that, and the conversation became heated.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Do you intend on getting the union vote when there's a large portion of the union workers that are gun enthusiasts, and you are actively trying to manage your second amendment right and take away your gun. You're for it. Alright. Thank you. To sush. You're not allowed to own any weapons. I'm not taking your gun away at all. You need a 100 rounds. You're doing a thing though when you said you're gonna take a gun. I did not say that. That's not true. I did not say that. Video. Hey. This is not okay. Hold on. Hold on. Alright? You went out to There's a lot of guys.

@itsEFlyX - 𝐄𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐧 (𝐗)

https://t.co/QHgbuKDWjX

@itsEFlyX - 𝐄𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐧 (𝐗)

🚨 WATCH: President Joe Biden makes an odd comment to a young girl in the crowd, adding to the strangeness is the fact that Hunter Biden reportedly had his father saved in his phone as "Pedo Pete." **Please Like/Repost to Amplify Awareness

Video Transcript AI Summary
We have a lot to do. I've known her since she was 12 and I was 30.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But guess what? We got a lot to do. Gotta say hi to me. We go back a long way. She was 12. I was 30. But, anyway,

@itsEFlyX - 𝐄𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐧 (𝐗)

https://t.co/5N7lByeWI0

@itsEFlyX - 𝐄𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐧 (𝐗)

🚨 WATCH: The glaring double standard in the MSM's treatment of Joe Biden compared to Donald Trump is alarming. Their deceptive practices have undermined trust in our institutions and pushed the Republic to the edge of collapse. This cannot be overlooked any longer. **Please Like/Repost to Amplify Awareness

Video Transcript AI Summary
President Biden was photographed with a cheat sheet during a press conference, including a reporter's name and question. He was seen reading answers from it, which is concerning. It's sad and unusual to witness this behavior.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I take questions from everybody. Speaker 1: Happened President Biden was photographed holding a cheat sheet during his press conference yesterday. Look. It has a photo of Los Angeles Times reporter Courtney Subramanian along with the pronunciation of her name, but there's more. The card also includes her question. You can also see someone's handwriting telling the president that she will ask the first question. Speaker 0: He goes, mister Cindy, I said, is there a guy named Cindy Ramsey from NBC? So guy gets up, gives a question, and he looks down, he starts reading the answer. I say, what the hell is going I never had that. I was there. When they're screaming questions at me, you gotta answer their questions. No, he was reading the answer, but we've seen that a few times, haven't we? It's pretty amazing. It's pretty sad if you wanna know the truth.

@itsEFlyX - 𝐄𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐧 (𝐗)

https://t.co/VVE98CdV8v

@itsEFlyX - 𝐄𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐧 (𝐗)

#Trump2024 https://t.co/dekoroUQuz

Video Transcript AI Summary
We must urge our elected officials to base national policy on moral values to secure a bright future for our children. A deep love for our country will enable us to achieve great things.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, perhaps there is a simple answer, not an easy answer, but simple. If you and I have the courage to tell our elected officials that we want our national policy based on what we know in our hearts is morally right, we'll preserve for our children this the last best hope of men on earth, or we'll sentence them to take the last step into a 1000 years of dark. Speaker 1: As long as the American people hold in their hearts deep and devoted love of country, then there is nothing that this nation cannot achieve. The best is yet to come.

@itsEFlyX - 𝐄𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐧 (𝐗)

https://t.co/zbAJ6Crz0l

@itsEFlyX - 𝐄𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐧 (𝐗)

⚠️ J6 = INSIDE JOB ⚠️ https://t.co/64ysFnJrom

@itsEFlyX - 𝐄𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐧 (𝐗)

https://t.co/vWigqmW8Vv

@itsEFlyX - 𝐄𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐧 (𝐗)

J6 was an INSIDE JOB *See Attached **Check My TL For More Information #EpsteinClientList #EpsteinFlightLogs #EpsteinIsland #J6TrueTimeline #InsurrectionDay

@itsEFlyX - 𝐄𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐧 (𝐗)

https://t.co/JCSfOGDBTB

@itsEFlyX - 𝐄𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐧 (𝐗)

PROOF: The Uniparty is REAL. Follow the money and you'll find out who's part of the Deep State. **See Attached

Video Transcript AI Summary
I hustle every day.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hustling. Every day, I'm hustling. Every day, I'm hustling. Every day, I'm hustling. Every day, I'm hustling. Every day, I'm hustling. Every day, I'm every day, I'm every day, I'm hustling. Every day, I'm hustling. Every day, I'm hustling. Every day, I'm hustling. Every day, I'm hustling.

@itsEFlyX - 𝐄𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐧 (𝐗)

https://t.co/kPyQafk2iV

@itsEFlyX - 𝐄𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐧 (𝐗)

PROOF: The Deep State/Uniparty was going after Donald Trump before he even took the Oath of Office. This interview aired January 3rd, 2017. **See Attached

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker warns that challenging the intelligence community is unwise as they have ways to retaliate. Despite being a savvy businessman, the speaker believes the individual is foolish for doing so. The intelligence community is reportedly displeased with how they have been treated and spoken about. Translation: The speaker cautions against provoking the intelligence community, as they have means to retaliate. Despite being a practical businessman, the speaker thinks it is unwise to challenge them. The intelligence community is said to be upset with how they have been treated and talked about.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: These shots, these antagonisms, taunting to the intelligence community. You take on the intelligence community. They have 6 ways from Sunday at getting back at you. So even for a practical supposedly hard nosed businessman, he's being really dumb to do this. What do you think the intelligence community would do if they were motivated to? But I from what I am told, they are very upset with how he has treated them and talked about them.

@itsEFlyX - 𝐄𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐧 (𝐗)

https://t.co/ShprxSKZyW

@itsEFlyX - 𝐄𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐧 (𝐗)

PROOF: Hillary Clinton's staffers DESTROYED official evidence after being subpoenaed by the US government. **See Attached

Video Transcript AI Summary
They destroyed devices with hammers at the State Department, including those related to the private email server. This action violated regulations. The number of reasons for this behavior decreased from 52 to 1.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: They destroyed blackberries with hammers in the state department. That's not what won the president's That's exactly what Evan Evan Evan. Evan. Hold on. Speaker 1: Can you fact check the hang on. Speaker 0: Hang on. Hang on. Hang on. Speaker 1: Hang on. Hang on. Hang on. Hang on. Hang on. Hang on. Hang on. Hang on. Hang on. Speaker 0: Evan Perez. Hammers fact check that for me, please, on the fly. Yes. They did, Brooke. I as as you mentioned, there were 13 devices, mobile devices and 5 iPads that, the FBI said that, you know, in some way were used with with her private email server, and they did, in some cases, just destroy them with hammers when they were done using them. She said that she fucking way of just I don't hear anything. No response. That is absolutely not following the rules and regulation of the state department. You know it. You're 52 reasons just went down to 1. No reasons left. Listen.

@itsEFlyX - 𝐄𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐧 (𝐗)

https://t.co/zmX7xsCUUB

@itsEFlyX - 𝐄𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐧 (𝐗)

The problem with America is not Donald Trump. **See Attached

Video Transcript AI Summary
President Sun is accused of being involved in a political witch hunt, but evidence shows him smoking crack with Ukrainian hookers. Despite his privileged lifestyle, his actions have been downplayed. The lack of empathy for addicts is questioned, especially if Joe Biden's involvement is revealed. The media's reaction would be drastically different if the situation involved Trump. The media's bias against Trump is evident in their coverage.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: President Sun and everyone keeps talking about this. They go, well, he's being it's a political witch hunt. Speaker 1: And I'm like, Speaker 0: he has videos of himself smoking crack with Ukrainian hookers with gun to their heads. Yeah. The guy lives in Malibu, and he has art shows in SoHo. It he's doing okay. Like, anyone's life's ruined with one of the videos on his laptop. Anyone. Speaker 1: They've done a remarkable job of minimizing the Speaker 0: impact that was on. So what? Yeah. He's he had his problems. It's amazing. They go, he had his problems. Wait. Wait. You have no compassion for addicts? I'm like, he's in the Ukraine with a gun to a hooker's head, smoking crack with a job his father got him. You don't have compassion for addicts? It's a little different. It's slightly different. Can we admit that? Speaker 1: Well, it's also much different if we can find out that Joe Biden was involved. Oh, yeah. Sure. And the idea that he wasn't involved seems more unlikely. Seems odd. Seems weird. Odd. Speaker 0: Do they they would just bring in Hunter? Speaker 1: It seems like they had conversations too. Yeah. It seems like he said that they didn't. It's a tough family. But it's just imagine Yeah. If that was Trump. Speaker 0: Yeah. Speaker 1: Just imagine that the overall media coverage of it. It would be Imagine how insane it would be if Donald Trump Donald Speaker 0: Trump was like, we should support the Ukraine. The everyone in the media in this country would go, fuck the Ukraine. Right? Speaker 1: Yeah. Anything he said Speaker 0: Yeah. They just it's they run the other way.

@itsEFlyX - 𝐄𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐧 (𝐗)

https://t.co/ShprxSKZyW

@itsEFlyX - 𝐄𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐧 (𝐗)

PROOF: Hillary Clinton's staffers DESTROYED official evidence after being subpoenaed by the US government. **See Attached

Video Transcript AI Summary
They destroyed devices with hammers at the State Department, including 13 mobile devices and 5 iPads linked to her private email server. This action violated State Department regulations.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: They destroyed blackberries with hammers in the state department. That's not what won the president's That's exactly what Evan Evan Evan. Evan. Hold on. Speaker 1: Can you fact check the hang on. Speaker 0: Hang on. Hang on. Hang on. Speaker 1: Hang on. Hang on. Hang on. Hang on. Hang on. Hang on. Hang on. Hang on. Hang on. Speaker 0: Evan Perez. Hammers fact check that for me, please, on the fly. Yes. They did, Brooke. I as as you mentioned, there were 13 devices, mobile devices and 5 iPads that, the FBI said that, you know, in some way were used with with her private email server, and they did, in some cases, just destroy them with hammers when they were done using them. She said that she fucking way of just I don't hear anything. No response. That is absolutely not following the rules and regulation of the state department. You know it. You're 52 reasons just went down to 1. No reasons left. Listen.

@itsEFlyX - 𝐄𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐧 (𝐗)

https://t.co/2Ac21x89ms

@itsEFlyX - 𝐄𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐧 (𝐗)

WATCH: The FBI explains to Congress how they "lost" the Hunter Biden laptop while it was in their custody. This serves as further proof of two-tiered justice system in America. Do you think they would've lost the laptop if it belonged to Don Jr.? **See Attached

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 is demanding to know the whereabouts of Hunter Biden's laptop, expressing concern about potential national security risks. The FBI Cyber assistant director admits to not knowing the laptop's location, despite it being turned over to the FBI in 2019. Speaker 0 requests to enter the contents of the laptop into the committee's record.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So where is it? The laptop. I wanna know where Hunter Biden's laptop is. Where is it? Speaker 1: Sir, I don't know that answer. Speaker 0: That is astonishing to me. Is has has FBI cyber assessed whether or not Hunter Biden's laptop could be a point of vulnerability allowing America's enemies to hurt our country. I'm holding the receipt from Mac's Computer Repair where in December 2019, they turned over this laptop to the FBI. And what now you're telling me right here is that as the assistant director of FBI Cyber, you don't know where this is after it was turned over to you 3 years ago. Speaker 1: Yes, sir. That's an accurate statement. Speaker 0: I see unanimous consent to enter into the record of this committee the contents of Hunter Biden's life, which I'm in possession.

@itsEFlyX - 𝐄𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐧 (𝐗)

https://t.co/T1IxrOHtFG

@itsEFlyX - 𝐄𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐧 (𝐗)

PROOF: Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi discussing how she engages in dirty politics. If you need more proof, just look at her and Paul's stock trading records. **See Attached

Video Transcript AI Summary
We demonize and then use the wrap up smear tactic in politics. This involves smearing someone with falsehoods, getting it reported in the press, and then using that as validation. It's a tactic that is self-evident.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Filling. You demonize and then you we call it the wrap up smear. If you wanna talk politics, call it the wrap up smear. You smear somebody with falsehoods and all the rest, and then you merchandise it. And then you write it, and they'll say, see, it's reported in the press that this, this, this, and this. So they have that validation that the press reported the smear, and then it's called the wrap up smear. Now I'm gonna merchandise the press's report on the smear that we made. That it's it's a tactic, and it's it's it's self evident.

@itsEFlyX - 𝐄𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐧 (𝐗)

https://t.co/8NsAeeBVgd

@itsEFlyX - 𝐄𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐧 (𝐗)

PROOF: Donald Trump always stood up for America's best interest. If we had taken our border security seriously, we wouldn't be experiencing the current illegal immigration crisis we are experiencing now. **See Attached

Video Transcript AI Summary
I will shut down the government for border security to prevent criminals, drugs, and problems from entering the country. I take full responsibility and will not blame others. Thank you.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You wanna know something? You said Okay. You wanna put that on my You said it. I'll take it. Okay. Good. You know what I'll say? Yes. If we don't get what we want, one way or the other, whether it's through you, through a military, through anything you wanna call, I will shut down the government. Okay. Absolutely. And I am proud, and I'll tell you what. Agree. I am proud to shut down the government for border security, Chuck, because the people of this country don't want criminals and people that have lots of problems and drugs pouring into our country. So I will take the mantle. I will be the one to shut it down. I'm not gonna blame you for it. The last time you shut it down, it didn't work. I will take the mantle of shutting down. That is And I'm gonna shut it down for border security. You shouldn't shut it down. But here's the line Thank you very much, everybody.

@itsEFlyX - 𝐄𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐧 (𝐗)

https://t.co/NbisbSANlt

@itsEFlyX - 𝐄𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐧 (𝐗)

PROOF: Donald Trump EXPOSES the corrupt war machine. This is just another reason the Uniparty/Deep State hates him. **See Attached

Video Transcript AI Summary
ISIS and Taliban are enemies fighting each other. The speaker questioned why the US should intervene, suggesting they should let them fight as both are enemies. The generals disagreed and ended up fighting both groups, which the speaker found to be crazy.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Is our enemy. ISIS is our enemy. We have an area that I brought up with our generals 4 or 5 weeks ago where Taliban is here, ISIS is here, and they're fighting each other. I said, why don't you let them fight? Why are we getting in the middle of it? It? I said, let them fight. They're both our enemies. Let them fight. Sir, we wanna do it. Then they go in and and and they end up fighting both of them. It's the craziest thing I've ever seen.

@itsEFlyX - 𝐄𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐧 (𝐗)

https://t.co/4UipD68PaZ

@itsEFlyX - 𝐄𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐧 (𝐗)

PROOF: Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi purposely elbowing a young girl. Donald Trump would never do that & the MSM would never let us forget it if he did. **See Attached

@itsEFlyX - 𝐄𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐧 (𝐗)

https://t.co/dub4gUZuYz

@itsEFlyX - 𝐄𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐧 (𝐗)

FLASHBACK: Tucker Carlson EXPOSES the Deep State and their involvement with the assassination of JFK. The intelligence community still operates like this today. **See Attached

Video Transcript AI Summary
The hidden CIA documents suggest the CIA's involvement in JFK's assassination. This revelation implies a government within a government, undermining democracy. The public's trust in the government has eroded over the years, with even former CIA directors implicated.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We spoke to someone who had access to these still hidden CIA documents person was deeply familiar with what they contain. We asked this person directly. Did the CIA have a hand in the murder of John F Kennedy, an American president? And here's the reply we received verbatim quote. The answer is yes. I believe they were involved. It's a whole different country from what we thought it was. It's all fake. It's hard to imagine a more jarring response than that. Again, this is not a quote conspiracy theorist that we spoke to. Not even close. This is someone with direct knowledge of the information that once again is being withheld from the American public. And the answer we received was unequivocal. Yes. The CIA was involved in the assassination of the president. Now, some people will not be surprised to hear that they suspected it all along, But no matter how you feel about or what you thought about the Kennedy assassination, pause to consider what this means. It means that within the US government, there are forces wholly beyond democratic control. These forces are more powerful than the elected officials that supposedly oversee them. These forces can affect election outcomes. They can even hide their complicity in the murder of an American president. In other words, they can do pretty much anything they want. They constitute a government within a government mocking by their very existence the idea of democracy. As cynical as we have become after 30 years of watching government officials ignore the voters who employ them, we were shocked to learn this. It's not acceptable. Americans have trusted their government less with every passing year since the killing of John f Kennedy. Maybe this is why. And people have known this for a long time. The people who knew would include every director of the CIA since November of 1963. And that list would include Obama's CIA director, John Brennan, one of the most sinister and dishonest figures in American life. That list would also include we are sad to say our friend, Mike Pompeo.

@itsEFlyX - 𝐄𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐧 (𝐗)

https://t.co/t3sNnzTxCI

@itsEFlyX - 𝐄𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐧 (𝐗)

FLASHBACK: Tucker Carlson explains the current state of US mainstream media and how the new Chinese/Russian alliance will likely be disastrous for ALL Americans. **See Attached

Video Transcript AI Summary
Iran and Saudi Arabia have resumed diplomatic relations with China's help. China and Russia have formed a new partnership, with Russia supplying oil and gas to China. Chinese President Xi predicts the end of American global dominance and the US dollar as the world's reserve currency. Despite these significant shifts, American news is focused on trivial matters like debating Trump's potential arrest and giving awards to sitcom actresses. The news coverage is criticized as being shallow and unimportant.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Let's pretend for a sec that our country had a news media that was interested in bringing you the news. Not in lecturing you about your moral inferiority. You're so bad. Or lying to you in transparently obvious ways. January 6th was an insurrection, guys. We're even enforcing you to repeat whatever childish slogan they've come up with this week. Vladimir Putin is a war criminal. Okay. Trans women are women. Alright. Say it or else. Let's imagine, say, that we live somewhere completely different in a country where the media felt obligated to tell you what was actually happening in the world and why it matters. What stories would we be talking about right now if we lived in that country? Well, here are the first two. Earlier this month, Iran and Saudi Arabia, the 2 most significant powers in the Muslim world, announced that after generations of proxy wars and snarling hostility to one another, they will be resuming diplomatic relations. Peace has broken out between blood enemies. As recently as last year very few would have thought that could happen and now it has happened. And it's happened. And here's a significant thing from an American perspective. It's happened because China, not the US state department, but the communist Chinese government brokered the deal. The world's largest atheist state has halted religious conflict between 2 theocracies. Did you see that coming? Probably not. But there's more. Yesterday, China's president Xi turned up in Moscow to announce a new partnership with Russia. Going forward, Russia will supply much of China's oil and natural gas. Vladimir Putin also agreed to use Chinese currency in trade with Asia, Africa, and Latin America. Once again, holy smokes. As with the Iran Saudi summit, very few people imagined anything like this could happen just 18 months ago. Quote change that hasn't happened in a 100 years, she said, is coming and we are driving this change together. Now what change was Xi talking about? Well, the end of American global hegemony. The end of the US dollar as the world's reserve currency. For a 100 years, he got it right since the close of the first world war, the United States has been the preeminent nation on Earth. For 40 of those years, we are locked in a cold war with the Soviet Union, of course, but at no time, no matter what they may have claimed, was there ever really a question about who is the most powerful country. We were the most powerful country. It was the American era. That era just ended a little over 2 years into Joe Biden's presidency. But amazingly, no one in this country seems to notice that it happened. That story is not leading the news tonight. Instead, we're arguing about whether or not to arrest Donald Trump for a fake crime to keep him from running for president again. Over at the White House, our senile president just gave some sort of medal to a sitcom actress, presumably for her bravery. You read those scripts so boldly. CNN is covering that story like it's the moonwalk. On Twitter, meanwhile, people seem excited that our vice president has sent a letter to a transvestite TikTok star called Dylan Mulvaney, who is famous for dressing like a 6 year old girl. Kamala Harris is very proud of him. That's the news we're getting. It is Weimar, but dumber.

@itsEFlyX - 𝐄𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐧 (𝐗)

https://t.co/FpqtzLZEfO

@itsEFlyX - 𝐄𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐧 (𝐗)

WATCH: Ukraine has recently begun enlisting Special Needs soldiers to join the fight against Russia in a conflict that has ravaged the region and will undoubtedly alter Ukraine's future forever. Shockingly, reports suggest that the US State Department urged Ukraine not to accept a peace deal prior to the onset of the conflict. These actions raise concerns about the continuous destabilization caused by the US war machine, leaving entire countries in ruins in its wake.

@itsEFlyX - 𝐄𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐧 (𝐗)

https://t.co/kohUda1xLU

@itsEFlyX - 𝐄𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐧 (𝐗)

9/11 Conspiracy: The Biggest False Flag in US History

Video Transcript AI Summary
On September 11, 2001, 19 hijackers orchestrated attacks on the U.S., leading to the destruction of the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. The official narrative blames Osama bin Laden, but many inconsistencies and cover-ups surround the events of that day. The subsequent investigations were flawed and failed to address key questions. Those who question the official story are labeled as conspiracy theorists and are discouraged from expressing doubts. The media played a significant role in shaping the narrative, promoting a specific version of events while discrediting alternative viewpoints.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: On the morning of September 11, 2001, 19 men armed with box cutters directed by a man on dialysis in a cave fortress halfway around the world using a satellite phone and a laptop directed the most sophisticated penetration of the most heavily defended airspace in the world. Overpowering the passengers in the military combat train pilots on 4 commercial aircraft before flying those planes wildly off course for over an hour without being molested by a single fighter interceptor. These 19 hijackers, devout religious fundamentalists who like to drink alcohol, snort cocaine, and live with pink haired strippers, managed to knock down 3 buildings with 2 planes in New York. While in Washington, a pilot who couldn't handle a single engine Cessna was able to fly a 757 in an 8,000 foot descending 270 degree corkscrew turn to come exactly level with the ground. Hitting the Pentagon in the budget analyst office where DOD staffers were working on the mystery of the $2,300,000,000,000 that Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld had announced missing from the Pentagon's coffers in a press conference the day before on September 10, 2001. Luckily, the news anchors knew who did it within minutes. Osama bin Laden. The pundits knew within hours. Osama bin Laden. The administration knew within the day. Terrorists who committed these acts and those who harbor them. And the evidence literally fell into the FBI's lap. That a hijacker's passport was found blocks from the World Trade Center crash site. If you can believe that. But for some reason, a bunch of crazy conspiracy theorists demanded an investigation into the greatest attack on American soil in history. That investigation was delayed, underfunded, set up to fail, a conflict of interest, and a cover up from start to finish. It was based on testimony extracted through torture, the records of which were destroyed. It failed to mention the existence of WTC 7, Abel Danger, P TECH, Subell Edmonds, OBL and the CIA, and the drills of hijacked aircraft being flown into buildings that were being simulated at the precise same time that those events were actually happening. It was lied to by the Pentagon, the CIA, the Bush administration, and as for Bush and Cheney, well, no one knows what they told it because they testified in secret, off the record, not under oath, and behind closed doors. It didn't bother to look at who funded the attacks because that question is ultimately of little practical significance. Still, the 911 Commission did brilliantly answering all of the questions the public had, except most of the victim's family members' questions, and pinned blame on all the people responsible, although no one so much has lost their job. Determining the attacks were Failure of imagination. Because nobody in our government at least. And I don't think the prior government could envision flying airplanes in the buildings. Except the Pentagon, FEMA, NORAD, and the NRO. The DIA destroyed 2.5 terabytes of data on Able Danger, but that's okay because it probably wasn't important. The SEC destroyed their records on the investigation into the insider trading before the attacks, but that's okay because destroying the records of the largest investigation in SEC history is just part of routine record keeping. NIST has classified the data that they used for their model of WTC seven's collapse, but that's okay because knowing how they made their model of the collapse would jeopardize public safety. The FBI has argued that all material related to their investigation of 911 should be kept secret from the public, but that's okay because the FBI probably has nothing to hide. This man never existed nor is anything he had to say worthy of your attention. And if you say otherwise, you are a paranoid conspiracy theorist and deserve to be shunned by all of humanity. Likewise, him, him, him, and her, and her, and her, and him. Osama bin Laden lived in the cave fortress in the hills of Afghanistan, but somehow got away. Then he was hiding out in Toribora, but somehow got away. Then he lived in Abbottabad for years, taunting the most comprehensive intelligence dragnet employing the most sophisticated technology in the history of the world for a decade, releasing video after video with complete impunity and getting younger and younger as he did so before finally being found in a daring seal team raid which wasn't recorded on video, in which he didn't resist or use his wife as a human shield, and in which these crack special forces operatives panicked and killed this unarmed man, supposedly the best source of intelligence about those dastardly terrorists on the entire planet. Then they dumped his body in the ocean before telling anyone about it. Then a couple dozen of that team's members died in a helicopter crash in Afghanistan. This is the story of 911 brought to you by the media which told you the hard truths about. His head could be seen to move violently forward. And They took the babies out of incubators. And Mobile production facilities. And The rescue of Jessica Lynch. If you have any questions about this story, you are a batshit, paranoid, tinfoil, dog abusing baby hater and will be reviled by everyone. If you love your country and or freedom, happiness, rainbows, rock and roll, puppy dogs, apple pie, and your grandma, you will never ever express doubts about any part of this story to anyone. Ever. This has been a public service announcement by the friends of the FBI, CIA, NSA, DIA, SEC, MSM, White House, NIST, and the 9/11 Commission. Because ignorance is strength.

@itsEFlyX - 𝐄𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐧 (𝐗)

https://t.co/K2nO9b5ip1

@itsEFlyX - 𝐄𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐧 (𝐗)

WATCH: Numerous athletes and public figures are collapsing mysteriously due to a surge in cardiac arrest cases. While attributed to climate change, the lack of scientific evidence raises questions. **See Attached

Video Transcript AI Summary
Did you get the vaccine? It's not a big deal.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You mind me asking if that if you're confirming that you did get the vaccine? It's not it's not a big deal.

@itsEFlyX - 𝐄𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐧 (𝐗)

https://t.co/LTf6uVrGpg

@itsEFlyX - 𝐄𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐧 (𝐗)

WATCH: Senator Rand Paul (KY) and Dr. Fauci have had many heated exchanges in the Senate Chamber. This video explains all the contradictions Dr. Fauci has made during COVID-19. **See Attached

Video Transcript AI Summary
We did not fund gain of function research in Wuhan. A bat coronavirus was enhanced in a lab. NIH funded research at Wuhan Institute, making a virus more contagious. Fauci denies lying to congress. Questions raised about experiments in Wuhan lab. NIH funded EcoHealth Alliance for bat coronavirus experiments. Fauci denies lying, blames Senator Paul. NIH admitted funding gain of function research in Wuhan lab. Fauci insists he did not lie.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We I I don't know how many times I can say it, madam chair. We did not fund gain of function research to be conducted in the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Speaker 1: In our health lead, we now know that a bat coronavirus was enhanced in a lab. Speaker 0: NIH and NIAID categorically has not funded gain of function research to be conducted in the Wuhan Institute. Speaker 1: The National Institutes of Health acknowledged that it funded research of a virus that was studied at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. The experiment unexpectedly, we're told, made a bat coronavirus more contagious than the original naturally occurring one. Speaker 2: Doctor Fauci, knowing that it is a crime to lie to congress, do you wish to retract your statement of May 11th where you claimed that the NIH never funded gain of function research in Wuhan? Speaker 0: Senator Paul, I have never lied before the congress, and I do not retract that statement. Speaker 3: A new letter raising questions about experiments in a Wuhan lab. Speaker 0: What was let me finish. Speaker 2: Shake an animal virus and you increase the transgility to humans. Right. You're saying that's not gain a function? Speaker 0: Yeah. That is correct. And and, senator Paul, you do not know what you are talking about, quite frankly. And I wanna say that officially. You do not know what you are talking about. Speaker 3: For years, the National Institutes of Health provided grant money to the EcoHealth Alliance Research Group, which conducted experiments with bat coronaviruses in Wuhan, China. Speaker 0: And if anybody is flying here, senator, it is you. That's what you are getting. Let me finish. We don't know. Speaker 2: We don't know. Wait a minute. I come to the lab, but all the evidence is pointing that it came from Speaker 0: the lab. You there will Speaker 2: be responsibility for those who funded the lab, including yourself. Speaker 4: National Institute of Health admitted this week that it funded controversial gain of function research using coronaviruses at a lab in China at the epicenter of the pandemic, contradicting claims from doctor Anthony Fauci that American tax dollars never paid for that kind of research. Speaker 0: I have not lied before congress. I have never lied. Certainly not before congress. Case closed.

@itsEFlyX - 𝐄𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐧 (𝐗)

https://t.co/e5qzfAZUoB

@itsEFlyX - 𝐄𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐧 (𝐗)

WATCH: Numerous social media influencers and public figures, who actively promoted COVID-19 vaccines, have sadly passed away following their inoculation. **See Attached

@itsEFlyX - 𝐄𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐧 (𝐗)

https://t.co/RaHInNgtCy

@itsEFlyX - 𝐄𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐧 (𝐗)

WATCH: The entire propaganda machine is crumbling at an unprecedented rate. With Trump and Elon in the mix, the Uniparty's grip on power is slipping away. Fear is palpable, and rightfully so. 2024 is poised to be the year of monumental change. **See Attached

Video Transcript AI Summary
Put down the shiny keys and pay attention. Donald Trump has been indicted, while Biden is accused of bribery. Trump needs to be back in office to fight against the new world order destroying the country. Join the fight or risk losing everything.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Put down the shiny fucking keys, people. Do you know what just happened? Do you know what's happening to your fucking life? They just indicted Donald Trump. Funny, few hours after all the evidence comes out that Biden and his fucking jerk whole family got all that $10,000,000 bribery bullshit. And then this fucking punk caused the DOJ to indite him. Understand something. When I say Donald Trump needs to get the fuck back in office, no matter what, I fucking mean it because the whole big picture, the DOJ, the feds, the president, Soros, this whole new world order bullshit is destroying this company on purpose, this country. And Donald Trump's the man that's been trying to stop it. And you fucking we don't like what he says. He's pecking. He's mean. You fucking assholes. This is historic. This is gonna backfire on you, democrats, so bad as it always does. Remember, there's one man as Donald Trump. There's a 100,000,000 of us who will never give up this fight and fight these monsters that wanna destroy this country as we speak. So get back on the fucking wagon. And if you weren't on the Trump wagon, hitch the motherfucking ride because your life is on the line. The state of this country forever is on the line. These fucking cocksuckers, they from Hillary Clinton all the way up, they get away with murder and everything, treason. Pass. Pass. Pass. They keep trying to take this man down, Donald Trump, because they fear the fuck out of him. They fear him because he's not part of the corporation. Do you understand? So stop looking at the shiny fucking keys and get the fuck on board because your life and the life of this country depend on it.

@itsEFlyX - 𝐄𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐧 (𝐗)

https://t.co/Flq4L0N8Xs

@itsEFlyX - 𝐄𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐧 (𝐗)

PROOF: Democrats repeatedly DENYING election results. Why is this only considered bad when Donald Trump/MAGA does it? **See Attached

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers discuss concerns about election legitimacy, mentioning Russian interference, Al Gore's loss in 2000, and issues with electronic voting machines. They express doubts about the fairness of various elections, including Stacey Abrams' loss in Georgia. The overall sentiment is that elections have been stolen through voter suppression and flawed processes.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You can run the best campaign. You can even become the nominee, and you can have the election stolen from you. Speaker 1: How can you win with Russian interference, though? Speaker 2: That's a real thing. About it in 2020. But rightly. Speaker 3: Because I think he's Speaker 1: an illegitimate president that didn't really win. So how do you, you know, fight against that in 2020? Speaker 2: You are absolutely right. Speaker 0: He is an illegitimate president Speaker 4: in my mind. Speaker 3: Would you be my vice president to a candidate president? Speaker 5: Folks, look. I absolutely agree. Speaker 6: Trump didn't actually win the election in 2016. He lost the election, and he was put in the office because of the Russians interfere. Speaker 0: Trump knows he's an illegitimate president. Speaker 3: The president elect, although legally elected, is not legitimate. Speaker 7: I don't see this president-elect as a legitimate president. You said you believe that Russia's interference altered the outcome of the election. Speaker 1: I Speaker 8: do. We have a president who, if in fact it is proven, has been assisted by the Russians and may in fact not be a legitimate president. Speaker 0: The one thing that Trump is fearful of, when it comes to his being president, is that finally, we will see how illegitimate his victory actually was. Speaker 7: I have an objection. Speaker 4: I object to the 15 votes from the state of North Carolina. I object because people are horrified. Speaker 0: He's an illegitimate president. Speaker 9: Do you believe Trump is a legitimate president? Speaker 10: What I believe is that there's no question that the outcome of this election was affected by the Russian interference. Speaker 5: There absolutely is a cloud of illegitimacy. Speaker 7: So that legitimacy is in question. Yes. Speaker 3: So that was a very tainted election. And and in that sense, it it's illegitimate. Speaker 9: Why do you think the president is going to such great lengths to essentially prove that he beat you? Speaker 0: Because he knows he didn't. He knows he's an illegitimate president. Speaker 11: Stolen emails. Stolen drone. Stolen drone. Stolen election. Welcome to the world of unprecedented Trump. Speaker 7: So do you believe president Trump is an illegitimate president? Speaker 6: Based on what I just said, which I can't retract. Speaker 3: In the Russian attempt to to have the election. And, frankly, the FBI is weighing in on the election. I think make the make it makes his election illegitimate. Speaker 0: There was a widespread understanding that this election was not on the level. We still don't know what really happened, Isaac. I mean, there's just a lot that I think will be revealed, history will discover. But you don't win by 3,000,000 votes and have all this other shenanigan stuff going on and not come away with an idea like, woah. Something's not right here. Speaker 10: The outcome of the election was affected by their interference, and now we need to know, you know, to what degree, if any, the Trump campaign was actually in collusion Speaker 0: with the with Russia. He knows he's an illegitimate president. So, of course, he's obsessed with me, and I believe that it's a guilty conscience. Speaker 1: We actually won the last presidential election, folks. They stole my last presidential election. Speaker 3: If Al Gore won that election, I think he won anyway. Speaker 1: Actually, I think I carried for it. Speaker 0: Bush versus Gore. A court took away a presidency. Speaker 12: If all the votes were Speaker 7: counted in Florida, then Al Gore would be president today and George Bush will be backing off. Speaker 2: I come from Florida where you and others participated in what I call the United States coup d'etat. Speaker 6: There's no doubt in my mind that Al Gore was elected president. Speaker 13: I rise to object to the fraudulent 25 Florida electoral votes. Speaker 1: I must object because of the overwhelming evidence of official misconduct, delivery fraud, and an attempt to The chairman must provide a Speaker 4: It is signed by myself on behalf of my diverse constituents and the millions of Americans who have been disenfranchised by Florida's inaccurate vote count. The Supreme Court, not the people Speaker 13: of the United States decided this election. Speaker 9: Speaking to a Democratic group in Chicago Tuesday, he made it clear he thinks Al Gore was the winner. Speaker 5: For the time it was over, our candidate had won the popular vote, and the only way they could win the election was to stop the voting in Florida. Speaker 14: Catherine Harris, Jeff Bush, Jim Baker, and the Supreme Court hadn't tampered with the results. Al Gore would be president. Speaker 10: The Supreme Court elected president. 2004. Yeah. Al Gore won the state of Florida in 2000, although not the presidency. Speaker 7: But the Supreme Court hampered that's a large charge. The Supreme Court stopped the counting of the votes, and if they'd let the count go on, Al Gore would have got the necessary vote. Speaker 2: The Supreme Court selected George w Bush as the president. Speaker 4: He was not elected. There is overwhelming evidence that George w Bush did not win this election. Speaker 12: What I observed, as a voter, as a citizen of Illinois, 4 years ago were troubling evidence of the fact that not every vote was being counted. Speaker 6: Don't think that George w Bush won the election, in 2 1,000 against our goal because I I think that he probably lost Florida and also that nationwide. Speaker 7: If you invite me back on this show in about 8 weeks, I think you're gonna learn that Al Gore actually did get all the votes there. Speaker 15: The court has been thwarting formation of the popular will. The most spectacular example being Bush versus Gore, where the majority by a five four vote enjoined the counting of more than a 100,000 ballots in Florida and essentially gave America its 1st court appointed president. Speaker 14: I think in 2000, everybody thought, well, he did win the election. It'll go work. Speaker 2: After the election when you stole the election, you came back here and say, get over it. No. We're not gonna get over it. Speaker 1: You know it. I know it. They know it. We won that election. Speaker 16: Constantly shifting vote tallies in Ohio and malfunctioning electronic machines, which may not have paper receipts, have led to additional loss of confidence by the public. Speaker 17: The right to vote has been stolen from qualified voters. Speaker 13: In 2004, the democratic process was thwarted. Speaker 15: The 2004 presidential election in Ohio was riddled with Speaker 17: say gross voting rights violations and misconduct, I joined with my colleague an objective to counting the state of Ohio's electoral votes. Speaker 18: As in 2000, the votes of many who wanted to vote were not, in fact, counted. Speaker 19: This last Friday night, I I arranged to meet senator Kerry at a fundraiser to give him a copy of my book. He told me he now thinks the election was stolen. Speaker 20: The wife of John Kerry said she has lingering doubts about the legitimacy of the election. Her theory goes like this. 2 brothers, she calls hard right Republicans, own 80% of voting machines in the US. Therefore, it would be easy to hack into the mother machines that control the electronic voting. Speaker 8: There were numerous irregularities in Ohio, including large percentages of rejections of provisional balloting, problems with voting machines. Speaker 0: As we look at our election system, I think it's fair to say that there are many legitimate questions about its accuracy, about its integrity. Speaker 16: There are still legitimate concerns over the integrity of our elections. Speaker 1: I agree with tens of millions of Americans who are very worried that when they cast the ballot on an electronic voting machine, that there is no paper trail to record that vote. Speaker 17: The numerous irregularities that occurred with the electronic voting machines in Ohio on November 2nd last year point to an unresolved national crisis. Speaker 4: We cannot declare that the election of November 2nd 2004 was free and clear and transparent and real. There must be independent testing of the voting machines used in Ohio. Speaker 21: I'm not confident that the election in Ohio was fairly decided. We know that there was substantial voter suppression, and the machines were not reliable. Speaker 16: The members of congress who have brought this challenge are speaking up for their aggrieved constituents, many of whom may have been disenfranchised in this process. Speaker 18: Treating today's electoral vote count in congress as a meaningless ritual would be an insult to our democracy unless we registered our own protest against the obviously flawed voting process that took place in so many of our states. Speaker 22: Voters who wish to cast a vote for president or vice president can't approach the polls with certainty that their vote will be counted. Speaker 7: One of Speaker 23: the most significant problems in Ohio and in many other states was the lack of measures to ensure the integrity of electronic voting machines. Speaker 5: In 2004, they caused Democratic voters in Ohio to wait for 8 hours before they could cast their ballot. They turned the Department of Civil Rights and the Justice Department into the voter suppression division with voter ID laws, voter purging, voter caging, voter intimidation. There aren't gonna be any more election stealing. Speaker 9: And despite the final tally and the inauguration and the situation we find ourselves in, I do have one very affirmative statement to say. Speaker 2: We won. Speaker 24: Without voter suppression, Stacey Abrams would be the governor of Georgia. Andrew Gillum is the governor of Florida. Speaker 8: You refused to concede and say that you lost. Do you stand by that decision today? Absolutely. Speaker 9: The election was not fair. The process was not fair. Speaker 15: If Stacey Abrams doesn't win in Georgia, they stole it. It's clear. It's clear. Speaker 12: I think that Stacey Abrams' election is being stolen from her. Speaker 9: It was not a free and fair election. Speaker 11: Brian Kemp stole the gubernatorial election from Georgians and Stacey Abrams. Speaker 9: But will I say that this election was not tainted, was not a disinvestment and a disenfranchisement of thousands of voters? I will not say that.
4Mischief
Posted - March 22, 2024 at 9:35 PM
Saved - March 23, 2024 at 1:56 AM

@4Mischief - • ᗰISᑕᕼIᗴᖴ ™ •

Hillary Clinton is deathly afraid that the Supreme Court could rule in favor of fair and safe elections. She wants to secure that her friends could use Dominion voting machines and “allegedly” steal another election in 2024 https://t.co/yteWFE8XMd

Video Transcript AI Summary
The Supreme Court, controlled by the right wing, might allow state legislatures to overturn presidential elections. This means the 2024 election could be decided by republican-controlled state legislatures, bypassing the popular vote and electoral college, potentially leading to election theft.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The right wing controlled Supreme Court may be poised to rule on giving state legislatures, yes you heard me that correctly, state legislatures the power to overturn presidential elections. Just think, if that happens, the 2024 presidential election could be decided not by the popular vote or even by the anachronistic electoral college, but by state legislatures many of them republican controlled to literally steal the next presidential election.
rallynate
Posted - November 7, 2024 at 9:19 AM
Saved - November 8, 2024 at 1:29 PM

@rallynate - Nathan Hughes

Obama got 69M votes. Kamala got 68M votes. But they want us to believe Joe Biden somehow got 81M votes and won, despite losing nearly every bellweather county? They raided our homes and sent us to jail for asking where those extra 13M votes came from. https://t.co/SArbKycWep

KashPatel_News
Posted - January 13, 2025 at 4:06 PM
Saved - January 13, 2025 at 10:37 PM

@KashPatel_News - Kash Patel 🇺🇸 News

These are just SOME is the crimes Hillary committed during the Obama administration. https://t.co/NdllkAEVSL

Video Transcript AI Summary
Nothing I sent or received was marked classified. I did not email classified material. However, there were classified emails sent. I never sent or received classified information at the time. I used my personal email for convenience, not realizing it would be an issue. I chose to turn over 55,000 pages of work-related emails, but 1,000 work-related emails were not returned. Claims about deleting emails after a subpoena are false. While my lawyers did not read every email individually, we went through a thorough process to identify work-related emails. Although there are potential violations regarding classified information handling, no reasonable prosecutor would bring a case. Regarding Donald Trump, there is enough evidence that any other person would likely have been indicted.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Nothing, and I will underscore nothing that I was sent, or that I sent was marked classified. Speaker 1: Secretary Clinton said I did not email any classified material to anyone on my email. There is no classified material. Was that true? Speaker 2: There was classified material emailed. Speaker 0: I never sent nor received any information that was classified at the time it was sent and received. Speaker 1: Secretary Clinton said there was nothing marked classified on her emails either sent or received. Was that true? Speaker 2: That's not true. 110 emails in 52 email chains have been determined by the owning agency to contain classified information at the time they were sent or received. When I got to work Speaker 0: as secretary of state, I opted for convenience to use my personal as secretary of state, I opted for convenience to use my personal email account because I thought it would be easier to carry just one device for my work and for my personal emails instead of 2. Speaker 1: Secretary Clinton said she used just one device. Was that true? Speaker 2: She used multiple devices during the 4 years, of her term as secretary of state. Speaker 0: I didn't have to turn over anything. I chose to turn over 55,000 pages of my email, but we turned over everything that was work related. Every single thing. Speaker 1: Secretary Clinton said all work related emails were returned to the state department. Was that true? Speaker 2: No. We found work related emails, 1,000 that were not returned. Speaker 0: What? Like with a cloth or something? I'll doubt. Speaker 3: You get a subpoena, and after getting the subpoena, you delete 33 1,000 emails, and then you acid wash them. Speaker 0: Everything he just said is absolutely false. Speaker 1: Secretary Clinton said neither she nor anyone else deleted work related emails from her personal account. Was that Speaker 2: true? The email software was removed. That didn't remove the email content. The effect was that millions of email fragments ended up in the server's unused or Slack space. This helped us recover work related emails that were not among the 30,000 that were produced to state. Speaker 0: We went through a thorough process to identify all of my work related emails and deliver them to the state department. Speaker 1: Secretary Clinton said her lawyers read every one of the emails and were overly inclusive. Did her lawyers read the email content individually? Speaker 2: No. Although there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information, our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such Speaker 0: a case. Did Donald Trump obstruct justice as you read the incidences as Mueller lays them out? Well, I think there's enough there that any other person who had, engaged in those acts, would certainly, have been indicted.
its_The_Dr
Posted - February 27, 2025 at 2:58 AM
Saved - February 28, 2025 at 2:25 PM

@its_The_Dr - Johnny Midnight ⚡️

Hillary Clinton, guilty of espionage in violation of 18 U.S. Code § 793: gathering, transmitting, or losing defense information. — The FBI and the DOJ were ordered by Barack Obama not to arrest Hillary Clinton for espionage. https://t.co/ngBRZ9HAoH

Video Transcript AI Summary
During closed-door testimony, former FBI lawyer Lisa Page stated that the Obama administration's Justice Department advised the FBI against pursuing the gross negligence statute against Hillary Clinton for mishandling classified information. This revelation seems to contradict James Comey's earlier recommendation against criminal charges. According to the transcript releases, there was concern about charging Clinton initially, but that changed under Loretta Lynch. A chart from the "mid-year exam" Clinton case listed possible federal statutes for prosecution, but next to gross negligence was the note that the DOJ was not willing to charge this, as only military cases have been prosecuted when the accused lost the information.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: About what the Obama justice department ordered federal lawyers to do and not to do concerning the Hillary Clinton email investigation. Chief intelligence correspondent Catherine Harridge tells us in sworn testimony on Capitol Hill, 1 of the insiders told lawmakers what she was told. Do you have Speaker 1: During closed door testimony last summer, former FBI lawyer Lisa Page said the Obama administration's justice department advised the FBI not to pursue the gross negligence statute for Hillary Clinton in the mishandling of classified information. Former US attorney and house republican John Radcliffe led the line of questioning about the statute known as 18 USC seven ninety three. Radcliffe, you're making it sound like it was the department that told you you're not going to charge gross negligence because we're the prosecutors. Page interrupted. That is correct. Page's testimony appears to conflict with then FBI director James Comey's recommendation in July 2016 against criminal charges for Clinton. Speaker 2: What I can assure the American people is that this investigation was done honestly, competently, and independently. No outside influence of any kind was brought to bear. Speaker 1: The Republican led house oversight and judiciary committee investigation ended in January. With Democrats now in control, the committee's new ranking Republican made the page transcript public. Speaker 3: The transcript releases show an inherent two tier system, one in which Hillary Clinton gets the treatment that she got, where there was actually at first concerned that they were going to charge her, then with Loretta Lynch in charge, before she recused herself, made it very clear that that was not going to happen. Speaker 1: The tip-off came from a chart drawn up by federal investigators assigned to the Clinton case known as mid year exam. Fox News has confirmed that the chart listed possible federal statutes for prosecution. Next to gross negligence was a notation, quote, DOJ not willing to charge this. Only known cases are military. Cases when accused lost the information. In response to the page revelations, the president tweeted the transcripts, quote, make the Obama justice department look exactly like it was, a broken and corrupt machine. The page transcript also confirms Fox's earlier reporting. The page testified Russia collusion was still unproven when special counsel Robert Mueller was appointed. Brett? Speaker 0: Captain, thank you.
Video Transcript AI Summary
There are some very suspect things about how the Hillary Clinton email investigation was handled. The fact that Loretta Lynch, who was the attorney general at the time, met with Bill Clinton on the tarmac right before Hillary had to speak with the FBI is definitely one of them. Also, Loretta Lynch told Jim Comey to publicly call this a matter, instead of a criminal investigation. These actions downplayed what Hillary Clinton had done while all the drama was being created around Donald Trump and the Russia collusion, which never materialized. What the American people are going to find out about the FBI is astonishing, especially the level of bias.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Act handling of the of the Hillary Clinton email investigation and just looking at the things that we already know that they did in terms of handling, this investigation are suspect. For example, Loretta Lynch, the then attorney general meeting with, Bill Clinton on the tarmac in that Phoenix, tarmac when it was two days before Hillary had to go speak to the FBI in an interview. That was one thing. The next thing that I that really is troubling is knowing that Loretta Lynch, the then attorney general, told her underling, Jim Comey, to call this publicly a matter, not a criminal investigation. So, again, here we have efforts to basically play down what Hillary Clinton had done and also create all of this drama around Donald Trump and potential collusion with Russia, which as we know never materialized. Well, chairman Goodlot was on with us yesterday and the head of the house judiciary committee. He's knee deep in all this stuff. And what he said is that what the American people are gonna find out, they're gonna be astonished by a level of bias they found within the FBI.
Video Transcript AI Summary
As Attorney General, I, Loretta Lynch, am addressing the tarmac meeting I had with Bill Clinton in Phoenix last June. This meeting occurred while the investigation into Hillary Clinton's emails was still ongoing. We met privately for about forty-five minutes. Soon after, FBI Director James Comey recommended no charges in the email investigation. While I acknowledge that the meeting may have appeared inappropriate, I want to be clear, Bill Clinton and I did not discuss the email investigation at any point. Our conversation was limited to topics such as golf and our grandchildren.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: That is what attorney general Loretta Lynch is now saying about her tarmac meeting with Bill Clinton. Back in June, you'll remember the two met privately in Phoenix for forty five minutes at a time when the feds were still investigating Hillary Clinton's emails. Well, days later, FBI director James Comey recommended no charges. Lynch admitting that the meeting maybe looked pretty bad, but Lynch still insists that she did not talk about the investigation with Clinton. Just golfing grandkids. Right?
DNIGabbard
Posted - July 23, 2025 at 1:09 PM
Saved - July 24, 2025 at 7:23 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
New evidence suggests that the Obama Administration manipulated the January 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment to falsely claim that Russia aided Donald Trump's 2016 election victory. It is alleged that key figures, including President Obama and CIA Director John Brennan, suppressed intelligence and relied on fabricated sources, such as the Steele Dossier. The released reports indicate a coordinated effort to undermine Trump's legitimacy and power, framing the narrative as a manufactured "Russia Hoax."

@DNIGabbard - DNI Tulsi Gabbard

🧵 New evidence has emerged of the most egregious weaponization and politicization of intelligence in American history. Per President @realDonaldTrump's directive, I have declassified a @HouseIntel oversight majority staff report that exposes how the Obama Administration manufactured the January 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment that they knew was false, promoting the LIE that Vladimir Putin and the Russian government helped President Trump win the 2016 election. In doing so, they conspired to subvert the will of the American people, working with their partners in the media to promote the lie, in order to undermine the legitimacy of President Trump, essentially enacting a years-long coup against him. Here are the top Obama Russia Hoax lies debunked by today's release: 🔗 https://www.dni.gov/files/ODNI/documents/DIG/DIG-Declassified-HPSCI-Report-Manufactured-Russia-Hoax-July2025.pdf

@DNIGabbard - DNI Tulsi Gabbard

LIE: Putin and the Russian Government helped Trump win the 2016 election TRUTH: President Obama, former Director of the CIA John Brennan, and others fabricated the Russia Hoax, suppressed intelligence showing Putin was preparing for a Clinton victory, manufactured findings from shoddy sources, disobeyed IC standards, and knowingly lied to the American people.

@DNIGabbard - DNI Tulsi Gabbard

LIE: The fabricated Steele Dossier was not used as a source in the Obama Administration’s January 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment of the November 2016 election TRUTH: Not only did CIA Director Brennan, FBI Director Comey, DNI Clapper and others include the Steele Dossier in the 2017 ICA, they overruled senior Intel officials who warned them it was fabricated and should not be used.

@DNIGabbard - DNI Tulsi Gabbard

LIE: The Obama Administration’s January ICA was an independent Intelligence Community product, produced with apolitical analysis. TRUTH: Obama ordered the Intelligence Community to create an Intelligence Community Assessment they knew was false, promoting a contrived narrative, with the intent of undermining the legitimacy and power of a duly elected President of the United States, Donald Trump.

@DNIGabbard - DNI Tulsi Gabbard

Together, the @ODNIgov records released on Friday, the @TheJusticeDept's June 2018 report known as the “Clinton annex" released earlier this week, and the @HouseIntel oversight report we released today confirm what many Americans have known: The Russia Hoax was a lie that was knowingly created by the Obama Administration to undermine the legitimacy and power of the duly elected President of the United States, Donald Trump.

Millie__Weaver
Posted - July 23, 2025 at 7:33 PM
Saved - July 24, 2025 at 4:53 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Millie Weaver discussed recent revelations from DNI Tulsi Gabbard's document release, claiming that Hillary Clinton's health issues were concealed by the Democratic Party, similar to Biden's health concerns. Weaver referenced her previous coverage of Clinton's health crisis during the 2016 campaign and criticized a Raw Story piece that dismissed her report as a conspiracy. She highlighted declassified information indicating that Russia possessed damaging details about Clinton's mental and physical health, including serious medical conditions and emotional instability.

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

Given the recent revelations in DNI Tulsi Gabbard's document release, we now know that Hillary Clinton was a chronically ill Presidential candidate and the Democratic party covered it up, much like how they covered up Biden's health problems and cognitive impairment. I covered the infamous hacking Hillary incident in 2016 and documented the obvious health crisis Hillary Clinton was having and how her campaign and the MSM tried shielding that truth from voters.

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

Raw Story did a hit piece on my infowars report calling it "the dumbest Hillary Clinton conspiracy of all-time" https://t.co/Xfe0X6lAUb

@Millie__Weaver - Millie Weaver 🇺🇸

DNI Tulsi Gabbard's recent declassification exposes Russia had a stash of damaging details about Hillary Clinton that could’ve ended her campaign: "intensified psycho-emotional problems, including uncontrolled fits of anger, aggression, and cheerfulness." "a daily regimen of heavy tranquilizers" "Type 2 diabetes, ischemic heart disease, deep vein thrombosis, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease"

DailySignal
Posted - July 24, 2025 at 5:47 PM
Saved - July 24, 2025 at 8:05 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared newly declassified documents revealing how Obama’s intel chiefs allegedly used their power to promote the Trump-Russia collusion narrative. Meanwhile, Hillary Clinton continues to claim the 2016 election was rigged. Yet, Democrats label Trump a threat for questioning the 2020 results. It's a clear double standard. @SenRandPaul addressed this at the Senate Homeland Security Committee today.

@DailySignal - The Daily Signal

Newly declassified documents from @DNIGabbard show Obama’s intel chiefs used government power to push the Trump-Russia collusion hoax. And to this day, Hillary Clinton cries “rigged” at the 2016 election. But Democrats say President Trump is the threat for questioning Biden's win in 2020? Spare us the double standard. @SenRandPaul speaks on this at a Senate Homeland Security Committee today👇 https://t.co/l3O17jg16t

@SenRandPaul - Senator Rand Paul

The Left spent years screaming that Trump was “illegitimate”—Hillary, Jimmy Carter, House Dems… all of them. But, both parties have a bad habit of being sore losers. The real threat isn’t just election denial, it’s when sore losers weaponize the government to get their way.

RandPaul
Posted - July 24, 2025 at 7:22 PM
Saved - July 24, 2025 at 7:59 PM

@RandPaul - Rand Paul

Hillary, Obama, and the Democrats clearly used the apparatus of government to delegitimize an election and harm Donald Trump. This should be fully investigated, and those responsible should be punished. Thanks to @DNIGabbard for bringing more of this to light.

@DailySignal - The Daily Signal

Newly declassified documents from @DNIGabbard show Obama’s intel chiefs used government power to push the Trump-Russia collusion hoax. And to this day, Hillary Clinton cries “rigged” at the 2016 election. But Democrats say President Trump is the threat for questioning Biden's win in 2020? Spare us the double standard. @SenRandPaul speaks on this at a Senate Homeland Security Committee today👇 https://t.co/l3O17jg16t

@SenRandPaul - Senator Rand Paul

The Left spent years screaming that Trump was “illegitimate”—Hillary, Jimmy Carter, House Dems… all of them. But, both parties have a bad habit of being sore losers. The real threat isn’t just election denial, it’s when sore losers weaponize the government to get their way.

Chicago1Ray
Posted - August 1, 2025 at 6:43 PM
Saved - August 2, 2025 at 12:47 PM

@Chicago1Ray - @Chicago1Ray 🇺🇸

FLASHBACK 🚨 Obama denied knowledge of Hillary's server Bongino ~ someone in the (W.H) staff had to give Hillary's private email to the White House Communications agency..it had to be vetted first, they had to know Arrest Hillary Clinton.. LOCK HER UP https://t.co/XmrB2O1jXd

Video Transcript AI Summary
In March 2015, President Obama said he learned about Hillary Clinton's private email server through news reports. He stated his administration encourages transparency and that his own Blackberry emails are available and archived. Dan Bongino claims Obama was not telling the truth, because emails to Obama's Blackberry had to be vetted and whitelisted in advance. Bongino states someone in the White House staff had to give Hillary Clinton's private email to the White House communications agency that handles the security of that device, therefore they had to know. He believes this provided an incentive for Obama's Department of Justice to make the Hillary Clinton email investigation disappear because Obama would have been a witness.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Mister president, when did you first learn that Hillary Clinton used an email system outside the US government for, official business while Speaker 1: she was secretary of state? At the same time, everybody else learned it through news reports. Speaker 0: Were you disappointed? The policy Speaker 1: of my administration is to encourage transparency, and that's why my emails through Blackberry that I carry around, all those records are, available and and archived. And I'm glad that, Hillary has instructed that, those emails, that had to do with official business need to be disclosed. Speaker 2: So that was former president Obama in March 2015 being asked about what he knew about Hillary Clinton's private server. Let's bring in Dan Bongino, former NYPD officer, former Secret Service agent, host of the Dan Bongino show. Dan, good morning. So from part of what we learned from Michael Horowitz report is that, of course, president Obama was emailing one of a few people who had the private email address of Hillary Clinton, back and forth off of the official server, yet he claims he didn't know she had a private email. Speaker 3: Pete, that's nonsense. And and, you know, now you you sense the frustration of large swaths of America who feel like, you know, there's two justice systems out there. You know, one for the elites and one for the rest of us who have to live under this. People are upset because Obama's clearly not telling the truth here, Pete. Let me let me debunk this thing for you immediately. Barack Obama's BlackBerry, his personal BlackBerry, the emails that came into it had to be vetted in advance. They had to be white listed, the opposite of being blacklisted. Right? Somebody in the White House staff had to give Hillary Clinton's private email to that DWACA, the White House communications agency that handles that, the security of that device. They had to know. He was not telling the truth. It's I mean, it's unbelievable what this administration got away with. And by the way, one more thing. That provides a perfect incentive for Barack Obama's Department of Justice to make the Hillary Clinton email investigation go away like an Alka Seltzer tablet and water because Barack Obama would have been a witness. Speaker 2: Alright. Dan, you're a Trump supporter. You
RodDMartin
Posted - August 9, 2025 at 7:46 PM
Saved - August 10, 2025 at 4:48 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The deep state attempted to redact Tulsi Gabbard's release of the Russia-hoax files, but she and President Trump ensured minimal redactions. The newly declassified House Intel report reveals that Obama-era officials fabricated the January 2017 intelligence assessment, suppressed key intel, and misled the public. Despite pushback from CIA officials, Gabbard prioritized transparency. The documents suggest a coordinated effort to undermine Trump, leading to calls for accountability, including potential subpoenas for Obama.

@RodDMartin - Rod D. Martin

🚨 DEEP STATE TRIED TO REDACT GABBARD'S RELEASE CIA officials tried to gut DNI Tulsi Gabbard’s declassification of the Russia-hoax files. She overrode them—and President Trump approved a release with “minimal redactions, no edits.” Here’s what they wanted buried 👇🧵

@RodDMartin - Rod D. Martin

2/ The just-declassified 46-page House Intel report shows Obama-era officials: • Fabricated the Jan 2017 ICA • Suppressed intel that Putin expected a Clinton win • Laundered shoddy sources • Violated IC standards • Misled the public

@RodDMartin - Rod D. Martin

3/ CIA careerists submitted heavy redactions/edits. They wanted to keep the truth hidden. But the DNI has greater declass authority than any IC element and doesn’t need their sign-off. Gabbard released it; Trump backed maximum transparency.

@RodDMartin - Rod D. Martin

4/ The declassified documents show the Obama team “manufactured” an assessment they knew was false, to sell the lie that Putin colluded with Trump—working hand-in-glove with friendly media to undermine a sitting president. Of course they wanted to keep this hidden.

@RodDMartin - Rod D. Martin

5/ Even CIA Director John Ratcliffe “strongly supported” the release despite internal pushback. Translation: parts of the intel Deep State fought sunlight. Leadership sided with disclosure. Elections really matter. That's why they tried to prevent Trump's election.

@RodDMartin - Rod D. Martin

6/ Democrats screamed “sources & methods.” Sen. Mark Warner called the release “desperate & irresponsible.” Funny how “national security” always means hide the receipts when the receipts hurt them.

@RodDMartin - Rod D. Martin

7/ Trump on Obama: “He’s guilty… This was treason. They tried to steal the election.” Speaker Mike Johnson: Congress may subpoena Obama over alleged coordination with intel to frame Trump as a Russian asset. https://www.jpost.com/american-politics/article-863340

US to depose Hillary Clinton, former Obama admin. officials | The Jerusalem Post US President Donald Trump accused former President Obama of "treason" in July, without providing evidence, of leading an effort to falsely tie him to Russia and undermine his 2016 campaign. jpost.com

@RodDMartin - Rod D. Martin

8/ Meanwhile, @AGPamBondi has formed a DOJ strike force and convened a grand jury to pursue indictments tied to the hoax. If the IC was weaponized against voters, accountability must be criminal, not just political.

@RodDMartin - Rod D. Martin

@AGPamBondi 9/ Bottom line: The 2017 Russia ICA wasn’t intelligence — it was a coup attempt, rushed and rigged to smear Trump before he even took office. The declassified docs are clear. Which is why they tried to hide them, even now. https://www.rodmartin.org/p/how-intelligence-community-analysis

How Intelligence Community Analysis Rules Were Flagrantly Violated in the Fraudulent Russia Collusion Assessment The 2017 Russia ICA wasn’t intelligence — it was political sabotage, rushed and rigged to smear Trump before he even took office, the House report now reveals. rodmartin.org

@RodDMartin - Rod D. Martin

@AGPamBondi If you enjoyed this content, please like and share, and also sign up for your FREE or PREMIUM subscription to my newsletter at http://RodMartin.org.

The Rod Martin Report | Rod D. Martin | Substack Tech Entrepreneur. Futurist. Christian. "Philosopher Capitalist". Click to read The Rod Martin Report, by Rod D. Martin, a Substack publication with thousands of subscribers. rodmartin.org
Nas_tech_AI
Posted - August 11, 2025 at 4:26 PM
Saved - August 13, 2025 at 2:25 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Tulsi Gabbard's recent interview has sparked significant attention, revealing a coordinated effort by the Obama administration to manipulate the narrative surrounding the 2016 election. She declassified over 100 documents, asserting "irrefutable evidence" that officials directed intelligence agencies to create a false narrative post-Trump's victory. Key meetings and assessments were manipulated, with dissenting intelligence suppressed. Gabbard has referred potential criminal charges to the DOJ, which has announced an investigation, suggesting the protective shield around Obama's administration may be weakening.

@Nas_tech_AI - Nas

DNI Tulsi Gabbard’s interview has gone viral. Tulsi Gabbard just exposed Obama’s real 2016 election scheme. It wasn’t only about Russia. It was bigger. Coordinated. And aimed at overthrowing an election. Here’s the full story (before it disappears): 🧵 https://t.co/cgkwhHSmkr

@Nas_tech_AI - Nas

Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard declassified over 100 documents on the 2016 Russia investigation. Her conclusion: "Irrefutable evidence" that Obama administration officials directed intelligence agencies to create a false narrative after Trump's victory. https://t.co/ZZlKMWLBH2

Video Transcript AI Summary
We now know without a doubt that Obama, Brennan, Clapper, and Comey were attacking our democracy, all while accusing us of attacking democracy. We know these things because director of national intelligence Tulsi Gabbard has released hundreds of documents revealing that the mindful objections of senior intel officials were ignored. Foreign spies were given a US government endorsed platform to smear Trump with abject lies. They used these lies to illegally spy on the Trump campaign. Former CIA director John Brennan lied to congress about his role. The cover up effort was real. Now that director Gabbard has revealed the truth, where will it all lead?
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We now know without a doubt that Obama, Brennan, Clapper, and Comey were attacking our democracy, all while accusing us of attacking democracy. We know these things because director of national intelligence Tulsi Gabbard has released hundreds of documents revealing that the mindful objections of senior intel officials were ignored. Foreign spies were given a US government endorsed platform to smear Trump with abject lies. They used these lies to illegally spy on the Trump campaign. Former CIA director John Brennan lied to congress about his role. The cover up effort was real. Now that director Gabbard has revealed the truth, where will it all lead?

@Nas_tech_AI - Nas

December 9, 2016: Obama convenes emergency National Security Council meeting. Attendees: CIA Director Brennan, DNI Clapper, Susan Rice, Andrew McCabe, and Loretta Lynch. Within hours, Clapper's assistant emails intelligence leaders: Create new assessment "per the President's request."

Video Transcript AI Summary
In 2016, nobody believed it possible for Donald Trump to defeat Hillary Clinton. When he did, it seems president Obama just couldn't take it. He convened in 12/09/2016 meeting in the White House Situation Room just weeks after Hillary Clinton conceded. He ordered an ICA or intelligence community assessment to functionally attribute Trump's unexpected win to the doings of Vladimir Putin. That Obama ordered phony assessment was about politics, not national security or the truth.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In 2016, nobody believed it possible for Donald Trump to defeat Hillary Clinton. When he did, it seems president Obama just couldn't take it. He convened in 12/09/2016 meeting in the White House Situation Room just weeks after Hillary Clinton conceded. He ordered an ICA or intelligence community assessment to functionally attribute Trump's unexpected win to the doings of Vladimir Putin. That Obama ordered phony assessment was about politics, not national security or the truth.

@Nas_tech_AI - Nas

Here's the timeline: December 7: Talking points prepared stating "Foreign adversaries did not use cyberattacks to alter the US Presidential election outcome." December 9: Obama's secret meeting. January 6, 2017: New assessment directly contradicts all prior findings. https://t.co/JKHSsIdgu0

Video Transcript AI Summary
We have found the evidence that proves that this Obama led intelligence community assessment was a contrived document, that was knowingly made using a fake intelligence or substandard intelligence in order to drive this, conclusion that president Obama wanted to see, which was that Russia helped Donald Trump get elected in 2016 or at least aspire to. This directly contradicted every other intelligence community assessment, every other assessment that came from the intelligence community for the last several months prior, both before the twenty sixteen election as well as immediate, immediately after.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We have found the evidence that proves that this Obama led intelligence community assessment was a contrived document, that was knowingly made using a fake intelligence or substandard intelligence in order to drive this, conclusion that president Obama wanted to see, which was that Russia helped Donald Trump get elected in 2016 or at least aspire to. This directly contradicted every other intelligence community assessment, every other assessment that came from the intelligence community for the last several months prior, both before the twenty sixteen election as well as immediate, immediately after.

@Nas_tech_AI - Nas

For months before the election, the Intelligence Community consistently assessed Russia was "probably not trying to influence the election by using cyber means." But Obama needed a different story. So they manufactured one.

@Nas_tech_AI - Nas

CIA Director Brennan forced inclusion of the discredited Steel Dossier despite senior officials' objections. When confronted about its flaws, Brennan reportedly said: "Yes, but doesn't it ring true?" A CIA officer testified: "DCIA refused to remove it" and "overruled their objections."

Video Transcript AI Summary
Your investigation uncovered witnesses who told you that or told your team that CIA Director John Brennan overruled intelligence officials who were objecting to the inclusion of the Steele dossier in the intelligence community assessment. How well would some of those witnesses hold up in court or in a public hearing of the House Oversight Committee? Well, these are some of the most senior intelligence officials within the CIA who came forward and spoke the truth to the House Intelligence Committee's, majority staff team that launched this investigation. They invest they they spoke to and interviewed over 20 intelligence community professionals, senior officials within the CIA, which is how they uncovered the truth of what actually happened as reported in the documents that we released yesterday.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Your investigation uncovered witnesses who told you that or told your team that CIA Director John Brennan overruled intelligence officials who were objecting to the inclusion of the Steele dossier in the intelligence community assessment. How well would some of those witnesses hold up in court or in a public hearing of the House Oversight Committee? Well, these are some of the most senior intelligence officials within the CIA who came forward and spoke the truth to the House Intelligence Committee's, majority staff team that launched this investigation. They invest they they spoke to and interviewed over 20 intelligence community professionals, senior officials within the CIA, which is how they uncovered the truth of what actually happened as reported in the documents that we released yesterday.

@Nas_tech_AI - Nas

Intelligence was deliberately suppressed that contradicted the narrative. Reliable sources showed Russian officials were "planning for candidate Clinton's victory." Others assessed "neither Trump nor Clinton" would respect Russian interests.

@Nas_tech_AI - Nas

A draft Presidential Daily Brief from December 8, 2016 stated Russia "did not impact recent U.S. election results." It was pulled hours before publication due to "new guidance." The truth was literally suppressed in real-time.

@Nas_tech_AI - Nas

An ODNI whistleblower who worked for Clapper refused to participate. He was "sidelined and cut out" for not playing along. He tried reporting through proper channels: Inspector General, Congress, DOJ. "He never got calls back. They were not interested," Gabbard revealed. https://t.co/4Lj0dTHfXs

Video Transcript AI Summary
From a firsthand account about the whistleblower within ODNI who worked for then, Obama's DNI, James Clapper, about how he refused to go along with this. "As a result, he was sidelined and cut out of this." "He was the cyber guy in the director, in the director of national intelligence, James Clapper's, team." "He was sidelined because he wouldn't play along with the lie that they were creating, and he did blow the whistle." "He raised this through the ICIG." "He raised this, tried to raise this with multiple members of congress, including senator Warner." "He never got calls back." "They were not interested in what he had to say and what he had experienced." "He even tried then to go and report this to the Department of Justice, under, president Biden and was refused." "No action." "They were not interested in taking action in this."
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The second thing is I can speak from a firsthand account about the whistleblower within ODNI who worked for then, Obama's DNI, James Clapper, about how he refused to go along with this. As a result, he was sidelined and cut out of this. He was the cyber guy in the director, in the director of national intelligence, James Clapper's, team. He was sidelined because he wouldn't play along with the lie that they were creating, and he did blow the whistle. He raised this through the ICIG. He raised this tried to raise this with multiple members of congress, including senator Warner. He never got calls back. They were not interested in what he had to say and what he had experienced. He even tried then to go and report this to the Department of Justice, under, president Biden and was refused. No action. They were not interested in taking action in this.

@Nas_tech_AI - Nas

The final Intelligence Community Assessment was created by only 5 CIA analysts—"unlike routine IC analysis." The entire conclusion rested on "one scant, unclear and unverifiable fragment" from a substandard report. This became the foundation for years of investigations.

@Nas_tech_AI - Nas

Tulsi Gabbard at the White House: "There is irrefutable evidence that President Obama and his national security team directed the creation of an intelligence assessment that they knew was false." She referred potential criminal charges to DOJ. https://t.co/ePr3U0vM0C

Video Transcript AI Summary
There is irrefutable evidence that detail how president Obama and his national security team directed the creation of an intelligence community assessment that they knew was false. They knew it would promote this contrived narrative that Russia interfered in the twenty sixteen election to help president Trump win, selling it to the American people as though it were true. It wasn't. The report that we released today shows in great detail how they carried this out. They manufactured findings from shoddy sources. They suppressed evidence and credible intelligence that disproved their false claims. They disobeyed traditional tradecraft intelligence community standards and withheld the truth from the American people. In doing so, they conspired to subvert the will of the American people who elected Donald Trump in that election in November 2016.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There is irrefutable evidence that detail how president Obama and his national security team directed the creation of an intelligence community assessment that they knew was false. They knew it would promote this contrived narrative that Russia interfered in the twenty sixteen election to help president Trump win, selling it to the American people as though it were true. It wasn't. The report that we released today shows in great detail how they carried this out. They manufactured findings from shoddy sources. They suppressed evidence and credible intelligence that disproved their false claims. They disobeyed traditional tradecraft intelligence community standards and withheld the truth from the American people. In doing so, they conspired to subvert the will of the American people who elected Donald Trump in that election in November 2016. They worked with their partners in the media to promote this lie, ultimately to undermine the legitimacy of president Trump and launching what would be a years long coup against him and his administration.

@Nas_tech_AI - Nas

DOJ confirmed receipt and announced a "strike force" to investigate. Pam Bondi: "We will investigate these troubling disclosures fully and leave no stone unturned to deliver justice." The protective shield around Obama's administration may finally be cracking.

@Nas_tech_AI - Nas

All information above represents direct quotes from Gabbard's statements, official DNI releases, and confirmed DOJ announcements. Declassified documents available on DNI website

@Nas_tech_AI - Nas

I hope you've found this thread helpful. Follow me @Nas_tech_AI for more. Like/Repost the quote below if you can.

mazemoore
Posted - December 1, 2025 at 8:09 PM
Saved - December 2, 2025 at 4:55 PM

@mazemoore - MAZE

Before the 2016 election Obama repeatedly said that you're not supposed to cast doubt on the legitimacy of an election. Right after the election Obama launched the Russia hoax to cast doubt on the legitimacy of the election. Perhaps the biggest scandal ever in American politics. https://t.co/PmfWgyYdZN

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 argues that sowing seeds of doubt about the legitimacy of our elections undermines democracy, calls it dangerous, and says it is work that benefits adversaries because democracy depends on people knowing that their vote matters and that those who occupy power were chosen by the people. Speaker 1 states that every intelligence agency in the federal government arrived at a consensus that the Russians hacked the DNC, and that the information released was the consequence of a decision by Russian intelligence and Russian officials at the highest levels; the CIA assesses that it was done purposefully to tilt the election toward a particular candidate, which is not a surprise, and this was helping the Trump campaign and hurting the Hillary campaign.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: When you try to sow the seeds of doubt in people's minds about the legitimacy of our elections, that undermines our democracy. No. No. No. I want everybody to pay attention here. That is dangerous. You're doing the work of our adversaries for them because our democracy depends on people knowing that their vote matters, that those who occupy the seats of power were chosen by the people. Speaker 1: Every intelligence agency in the federal government arrived at a consensus that the Russians had hacked, the DNC, and the information was that was now being released was as a consequence of a decision by Russian intelligence and Russian officials at the highest levels. So what the CIA is now assessing, which was it was done purposefully to tilt the election in another in the direction of a particular candidate shouldn't be a surprise to anybody, and in fact isn't a surprise to anybody. This was helping the Trump campaign, and it was hurting the the Hillary campaign.
DschlopesIsBack
Posted - February 3, 2026 at 2:59 AM
Saved - February 4, 2026 at 4:12 AM

@DschlopesIsBack - Gain of Fauci

Reminder that they didn’t rig and steal the 2020 election for Biden. They stole it for Obama. https://t.co/mP1YTtLwwi

View Full Interactive Feed