TruthArchive.ai - Related Post Feed

rcn400
Posted - July 18, 2020 at 1:36 AM
Saved - November 21, 2023 at 3:36 PM

@rcn400 - Rob

Would you support abolishing the Electoral College and instituting the Popular Vote?

@rcn400 - Rob

Personally, I am all for the Popular Vote. I believe that every American’s vote should count.

hollandcourtney
Posted - May 18, 2023 at 7:54 PM
Saved - May 18, 2023 at 9:14 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Nevada Democrats voted in favor of the National Popular Vote Compact, potentially impacting future US presidential elections. @reSeeIt offers a way to secure important tweets permanently, but @gaelicgirl87 expresses confusion about it.

@hollandcourtney - Courtney Holland 🇺🇸

🚨BREAKING🚨 Nevada Democrats just took the first step in DISMANTLING the electoral college in Nevada by voting in favor of the National Popular Vote Compact. This could potentially impact who becomes the President of the United States in the future. Every single Nevadan needs…

@csharpner - CSharpner - #ImpeachBidenNOW

@hollandcourtney @reseeit save tweet

@reSeeIt - reSee.it

@csharpner @hollandcourtney Don't let the most important Tweets disappear. 🔒 Secure them forever with @reSeeIt. @csharpner, check out the permanent record for this tweet here 👇 https://resee.it/tweet/1659286395738025984

reSee.it #2009 - @hollandcourtney @hollandcourtney - PDF, screenshot, & permanently saved Tweet resee.it

@gaelicgirl87 - Gaelicgirl87

@reSeeIt @csharpner @hollandcourtney Love that you do this but I do not understand it.

MrSausageGet
Posted - September 12, 2023 at 1:34 AM
Saved - December 7, 2023 at 6:17 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
In the 2022 midterms, Republicans expected a red wave due to public discontent with vaccine mandates, inflation, and other issues. However, the results were not as anticipated. Races were allegedly stolen in Arizona, and state legislatures flipped to blue in Michigan, NH, and PA. Republicans struggled in US Senate races, including in Georgia. Candidates quickly conceded, and the media blamed Trump instead of addressing the rigged races. Florida's results were the only ones that aligned with expectations. The lack of citizen uproar and apathy is concerning.

@MrSausageGet - Mr. Sausage

I recall the 2022 midterms, when the majority of the country were disgusted with vaccine mandates, inflation, the Afghanistan withdrawal, open borders, etc. There was record turnout for the Republican primaries and record turnout for the general. Democrats had absolutely no platform to campaign on and even the propaganda leftist outlets like CNN predicted a record breaking red tsunami. Trump was tweeting Q memes and storm memes every day. Even the elusive “Q” came out on Election Eve to tell us “it had to be this way” and “we had everything we needed.” Yet, we saw Republicans win only a small handful of additional seats in the House. We saw Democrats slightly expand their lead in the Senate, where even a literal walking vegetable named John Fetterman who could not speak after a stroke won his race. In Arizona, they blatantly stole races in broad daylight when machines stopped working on Election Day in Republican counties when Republicans had a publicly known plan to swamp the polls on Election Day. Katie Hobbs, one of the most unlikeable and stupid people to ever run for Governor, who cannot speak in public and did not debate nor campaign, supposedly won her race over possibly the most popular gubernatorial candidate in recent history, @KariLake. In Michigan, despite the entire state absolutely loathing the corrupt incumbent Democrat tyrants in charge - unbelievably the state legislature actually flipped from red to blue and all 3 tyrants won their races. In NH and in PA, against all odds, the state legislatures also flipped from red to blue despite two years of socialism and an expected red tsunami. In Nevada, somehow a Republican won the Governor and Lt. Governor races yet radical leftists won the AG and US Senate races. The security cameras turned off overnight in Washoe County, NV and when they came back on, miraculously Adam Laxalt had lost his lead in the Senate race. I find it odd that Republicans can win important races in certain states, yet seem to always come up short in US Senate races. As though a huge chunk of voters show up to the polls and decide to vote Republican EXCEPT for those pesky US Senate races, where they prefer the socialist. Like in GA, where “Republicans” seem to win easily everywhere except when they get caught from behind and end up in those gosh-darn run-offs, where the Georgia voters just irrationally decide they want a radical socialist Democrat in the Senate. I remember how all the candidates, like wet paper towels, folded up and quickly conceded without so much as a whimper. Blake Masters, Tudor Dixon, Tim Michels, Adam Laxalt, Don Bolduc, Hershel Walker, Doug Mastriano, Dr. Oz, etc. Only Kari Lake and @AbrahamHamadeh stood tall and fought. Almost one year later and they are still standing all alone. So despite even the most liberal media predicting essentially the biggest red wave in history, we were now supposed to believe that the obviously-rigged races nationwide were the fault of @realDonaldTrump , even though he wasn’t holding office nor in a race himself. BOTH parties marched out and started taking about how Trump was a losing brand. Not a mention of the blatantly rigged bullshit we had all just witnessed. For those EXTRA critical thinkers out there, coincidentally the only state that really performed as expected was Florida. And it just so happened that Florida reported their final results first on Election Eve, thus providing an indicator of the direction the night should have gone but also feeding a strong narrative that Ron DeSantis was obviously THE chosen one given his state’s performance. I watched that night in horror as I realized that we may not be able to simply outvote the fraud and the communists were not afraid to put it right in our faces and dare us to do anything. What I found even more disturbing was the lack of uproar from the citizens. The apathy will end us. STAND UP! @GenFlynn @KariLakeWarRoom @TuckerCarlson @elonmusk

nicksortor
Posted - October 4, 2023 at 11:26 PM
Saved - October 5, 2023 at 12:40 AM

@nicksortor - Nick Sortor

#BREAKING: California Gov. Gavin Newsom has just signed a bill BANNING hand-counting ballots in most elections WHY?

DecentFiJC
Posted - October 23, 2023 at 12:02 PM
Saved - October 24, 2023 at 2:13 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Israel's alleged involvement in the 2022 AZ gubernatorial race is causing controversy. Accusations of aiding in the theft of the election and installing communist leaders have raised concerns. The thread provides links to evidence and connections between various individuals and organizations. The suppressed information suggests a coordinated effort involving Genomics, UNIT 8200, and more. The article urges readers to question the actions of Katie Hobbs and highlights the alleged ties to Benson, Nessel, and Griswold. The article also mentions the MeidasTouch Network and its connection to forthcoming indictments against President Trump. Additionally, it hints at connections between FTX, ERIC, ERICSSON, Ukraine, GBI Strategies, Barbara Fried, and voting hardware/software. The article concludes by emphasizing the need for further investigation.

@DecentFiJC - Jonathan

“Do you stand with Israel?!?!” “I’ll GLADLY ‘Stand With Israel™️’ as soon as ISRAEL comes clean about its role in helping Katie Hobbs steal the 2022 AZ gubernatorial race from Arizonans. And then identifies EVERY player involved in the steal and helps us take them down. But not a moment sooner.”

@DecentFiJC - Jonathan

The link to this thread is embedded below.😒 https://t.co/JiXbIjzd6f

@DecentFiJC - Jonathan

Certainly. Just added it to the 2nd tweet above. No country that aids in stealing from Arizonans and helps keep people like Kari and Abe out of the Governor’s and AG’s offices (while installing psychopathic Communists in their places) is our greatest ally. Not even a little bit close. Arizona (and America) is a more dangerous place to live today because of their actions.

@DecentFiJC - Jonathan

Always love these “welp, let me just go ahead and look past all that evidence ya got there…” takes.

@DecentFiJC - Jonathan

You should search my feed for: -UNIT 8200 -Genomics -Israel -Hobbs -Maricopa

@DecentFiJC - Jonathan

This thread is being MASSIVELY suppressed, so you probably shouldn’t read it and share it everywhere immediately. Definitely don’t do that.

@DecentFiJC - Jonathan

Whatever Katie Hobbs is “standing with”, you should be running from. Full speed. She’s directly tied to EVERYTHING already mentioned in this thread and more. https://t.co/4tnU2NbQE8

@DecentFiJC - Jonathan

Hobbs, Nessel, Benson, Griswold, States United, etc. This is also why ARIZONA still has Kris Mayes LARP’ing in AG ABE HAMADEH’s OFFICE TODAY. (It’s all coordinated. And Woll was MURDERED by someone associated with these people.) https://t.co/MaNTTGJAS4

@DecentFiJC - Jonathan

Benson (MI SOS) and Hobbs (AZ SOS). Note the lockstep CIA rhetoric. Verbatim. Israel helped them do this to all of us.🤬 https://t.co/PatSUl1ENQ

@DecentFiJC - Jonathan

Remember how “Meidas Lisa” knew about all the coming indictments against President Trump? That was so neat. Prophetic, even. Remind me, who’s behind MeidasTouch and MeidasTouch Network again?🤔🤔🤔 https://t.co/KI67MvKFK1

@DecentFiJC - Jonathan

And DEFINITELY don’t look at this thread, which further DIRECTLY connects: -FTX -ERIC (Voter Registration fraud apparatuses) -ERICSSON -UKRAINE -GBI STRATEGIES (Michigan; Nessel; etc.) -BARBARA FRIED (Mind the Gap) -ALL VOTING HARDWARE/SOFTWARE -etc.

@DecentFiJC - Jonathan

It’s way too on the nose at this point.🤣

LauraLoomer
Posted - February 13, 2024 at 3:55 PM
Saved - February 13, 2024 at 8:11 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Tennessee state Senator Frank Nicely introduced a bill that would ban presidential electors from casting a vote for any candidate whose eligibility is in question. The bill has passed in the TN Senate and is awaiting review by the elections subcommittee. If signed into law, it could deny President Trump electoral votes from Tennessee. Residents are urged to contact their state representatives and the governor to oppose the bill.

@LauraLoomer - Laura Loomer

ATTENTION TENNESSEE 🚨🚨 RINOS IN TENNESSEE ARE TRYING TO DENY PRESIDENT TRUMP ACCESS TO THE BALLOT AND ALL ELECTORAL VOTES FROM TN🚨🚨 Anti-Trump, Republican Tennessee state Senator Frank Nicely @SenFrankNiceley introduced SB 2848, otherwise known as the “Tennessee Ballot Access Act”. The bill would go into effect immediately after being signed, and it would “BAN Presidential electors from the state of Tennessee from casting a vote for any presidential or vice presidential candidate whose eligibility for office is in question or doubt at the time of the vote, and until such time as the candidate has been properly investigated and cleared of any reasonable doubt.” The bill was introduced by a REPUBLICAN as communist secretaries of state across the country are trying to remove President Trump from the ballot. The bill has already passed in the TN Senate on first consideration, and now it’s in House, waiting to be reviewed by the elections subcommittee. From there, the bill will go straight to a vote, which could be any day now. Then it would go to TN Governor @GovBillLee to sign it into law. Governor Lee better not sign this bill. If you live in Tennessee, call your state Reps and your governor and tell them to kill this bill which would deny President Trump electoral votes from Tennessee. https://wapp.capitol.tn.gov/apps/BillInfo/default.aspx?BillNumber=SB2838&GA=113

Tennessee General Assembly Legislation wapp.capitol.tn.gov
BarnettforAZ
Posted - February 15, 2024 at 11:18 PM
Saved - February 17, 2024 at 12:56 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The bill to appoint electors in the Republican primary was tabled without a vote. We need Governor Hobbs to sign the election bill we want to ensure a legally run election. Remember who fought to protect your vote and who wanted to continue using the same illegal elections from 2020/2022. The weight of future election failures will fall on certain people's shoulders. Nov 2023 will be 2020 2.0. Listen to @IvanRaiklin to understand why we demand electors be appointed.

@BarnettforAZ - Josh Barnett-AZ

From yesterday. It was tabled with no vote. When November 2024 comes around remember who was fighting to protect your vote and who said we should not appoint electors to the Republican primary winner and tell Governor Hobbs to sign the election bill we want or the electors will remain appointed. The appointment of electors would be rescinded and we would go back to a popular vote to determine who the electors go to if she signed the bill that we want to guarantee a legally run election to protect the people’s vote. Remember who wanted to continue using the same illegal elections we experienced from 2020/2022 and who wanted the vote protected. When the next election turns south again, and it will, certain people will have to bear that weight on their backs and it’ll be heavy. Unbearably heavy. Nov 2023 will be 2020 2.0 Mark my words and screenshot this post. Listen here to understand why we are demanding electors be appointed. @IvanRaiklin https://x.com/barnettforaz/status/1758167803742552344?s=46&t=jyh_a9CLHL6-pHOfzge8_Q

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker introduces a resolution that asserts the Arizona legislature's authority over presidential elections. They argue that the 2020 and 2022 elections were illegally run and that no laws have been passed to protect the 2024 presidential vote. They propose appointing electors to the Republican primary winner through a resolution. Another speaker questions the effectiveness of the resolution, citing Supreme Court precedent and the need to follow state constitutional procedures. They also raise concerns about bypassing the election results and potentially allowing the other side to do the same. The first speaker argues that appointing electors is necessary to protect the vote and fix the issues with past elections.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Like I said, people on both sides of the aisle do not trust our elections. And this resolution basically says that your Arizona legislature, according to the US Constitution, has full plenary authority over presidential elections granted by article 2, section 1, clause 2 of the constitution. And that's basically the bill. Speaker 1: Okay. Any questions for the bill sponsor? Okay. Seeing none, mister vice chair, is there anyone standing in to speak? Speaker 2: Let me see. We have yes for Josh Barnett. Speaker 3: Thank you, madam chair. I've been all over the state asking do you believe that 2020 was a legally run election or was it administered properly? And even some Democrats admit that it wasn't. But every Republican I've met has said absolutely it was an illegally run election. Rules, form, procedure, all broken. Then I asked him, what about 2022? Do you believe that was a legally run election that was properly administered? Every Republican I talked to says absolutely not. Even some Democrat friends of mine agree that there is stuff that went on is what they tell me. So I think I wanna ask, how many laws have been passed since 2020 to protect the vote the presidential vote of 2024? Significant significant loss. And the answer is 0. We've had a few things that have gone past, you know, things that I wish would be passed but Governor Hobbs will veto. And nothing nothing is going to be accomplished up to 2024 to protect the Presidential vote which the state legislature has a plenary authority over like she said article 2 section 1 clause 2. And that's why I asked the legislators, where we are today at this point, can you guarantee the people that you represent that the 2024 presidential election will be legally run and administered according to law? Can you guarantee that? And I'm asking them, if you cannot guarantee that, then we are asking you to appoint the presidential electors right now to the Republican primary winner via a resolution plus 1 majority vote. And the reason why is we have a plus 1 majority in the House and Senate. The majority of Arizonans have voted for a conservative agenda based off of that. And if Katie Hobbs does not want the 11 electors to be assigned to the Republican primary winner, then sign the election bill that we won. Thank you. Speaker 1: Any questions for the speaker? Okay. Seeing none, mister vice chair, is there anyone else signed in to speak? Speaker 2: I do actually have a question for the speaker, madam chair. So, Mr. Barnard, you and I have had this conversation. I'm glad we've brought this up for discussion because we've had this conversation online or over the phone numerous number of times. But you cite Moore versus Harper for this plenary authority, which by the way, is a matter of original intent. I agree that we do have this authority under the constitution. Okay? But in the in Moore versus Harper, the US Supreme Court said that we did, asterisk, so long as we follow the procedures in the state constitution for legislating. So I so provided that we send it to the people or to the governor or whatever the case may be and that it otherwise comply with the state constitution. But this this resolution, it doesn't follow those procedures. Right? We're not sending it to the people. We're not sending it to the governor. Right? Speaker 3: Correct. It does not require governor's signature. Speaker 2: Right. And so I I question how it could be effective in that case given given the Supreme Court precedent laid down in Moore versus Harper. I should say dicta if we're if we're talking about the electors clause. Right. Speaker 3: Well, the thing the thing that I think a lot of people aren't, seeing is that the electors are not federal officers. So it's not invoking article 1 section 4. As a legislative law making function. What what this is doing is it's it's using the the federal elections clause. Article 2 section 1 is the electors clause that is used. That is the US Constitution which the the, supremacy clause trumps anything that's in Arizona basically. But as you're as you're aware. Speaker 2: But mister Barnett, and that's why I said it was dicta as to the elector's clause. Right? But in Moore versus Harper, didn't the Supreme Court say that the 2 clauses were similarly worded and conduct an analysis of a line of cases flowing from the electors clause? Speaker 3: Well, I mean, if you look back, Ray v Blair in 1952, they have the presidential electors exercise a federal function, which that distinction is not really made. It's a federal function to, in balloting for president and vice president. But they are not federal officers. They act authority of the state which in turn receives its authority from the federal constitution. So that that differential with the legislative law making function on our Article 1 Section 4 and the Federal function with the plenary authority on Article 1 Section 1. That's the difference between, Morvie Harper with what they're saying and and what I'm what I'm asking to be done. Speaker 2: So I again, I agree with you as a matter of original intent. But what I'm saying is I don't see how this ever is given any effect by the courts. Right? Given what the Supreme Court very clearly said about the electors clause and more. Speaker 3: Well, I mean, just recently, justice Kavanaugh said that the state legislature has the plenary authority. It's granted. At the, the the, hearing with Colorado about Colorado with the Supreme Court, He clearly said I got the video here if you guys wanna hear it. I also have the video of justice Alito asking the Democrat attorney Jason Murray about whether, in a scenario that, let's say, you didn't like how things are going, you're gonna appoint the electors to, to one side or the other. 3 days before the election, and Jason Murray said, I believe that can be done citing Chaofalo v Washington for 2020. Citing that plenary authority that that he believes as a democrat attorney that Speaker 2: Madam chair and mister Barnett, I wanna I wanna be clear about what I'm asking. So SCOTUS does not doubt that we have the plenary authority. Right? That Correct. Nobody doubts it. The question is the means by which the authority is exercised. So I I just wanna peg that for you and whether it has to be a bill, or I think it's signed by the governor or ratified by the people, which I believe in more of v Harper, SCOTUS gave a very strong indication that that is where they would fall on the question. Again, they're not all the courts are not always right about the interpretation of the constitutional, but there's the that old saying, you know, the Supreme Court is not final because it is infallible. It is infallible because it is final. So, that's that's one thing I would take. And then let's presume for a second that we did have this power. Let's presume for a second that we that actually, we do, but let's presume for a second that the courts would recognize it. I mean, wouldn't we be guilty of exactly what we accuse the other side of doing? Right? Stealing an election. We would literally be saying, we're gonna pre appoint the nominees to our party's elector without actually running an election. Would that be just as bad as what we imagine that they might be doing? Speaker 3: Well, I I believe you're protecting it. The last two elections have been illegally run. Speaker 2: Yes. They they I I would I would totally concur with that. We've we've taken some major steps in the direction to fix it. Speaker 3: But relevant enough to protect our vote 24. Speaker 2: No. We might just Let's keep Speaker 1: the discussion through the chair. Speaker 2: Yes, madam chair. So but but my but my point being, I wanna I wanna clear answer from you. Would we not be doing what we accuse them of doing? Speaker 3: I don't believe so. I believe you're protecting a vote. Because the ultimate goal of this is to have the governor sign an election bill that that that we've been pushing for, like the precinct county, precinct voting. All the stuff that that Republicans have been asking for for years now that we have not been able to get for a variety of reasons accomplished. And I believe you're protecting that vote and you're protecting my vote because I believe my vote has been disenfranchised and canceled out by the prior illegally run elections. And I also believe that the resolution is is the way to go forth with this because it is a federal function. It is a plenary authority that you have, that you do not need to use any other any other route with that with the federal function authority you have. You do not need to use any any other way than a resolution which is more or less an order of of the state legislature. And one more thing chair. MCRC passed this 90 plus percent. Over Over 25100 people there, 90 plus percent of people said this is what we wanna see happen. LD 3 passed it 96 0 unanimously. They are fed up with these illegally run elections and they want it fixed and they want their vote protected moving into 2024. Thank you. Speaker 1: Any other questions? Go ahead. Speaker 4: Okay. So you're you're arguing that we should go ahead and just appoint electors now and ignore the results of the election? Is that what I'm understanding? Speaker 3: Ignore the results of another illegally run election? Speaker 4: Okay. And let so madam chair Mr Burnett. What if we decide let's just side with the other side in this case? Why don't we just throw the votes to Biden right now? Speaker 3: You can't technically. Constitutionally, you have you have that ability to do so. Speaker 4: Yeah. I'm not asking you constitutional. I think there's a question here. I'm asking you. Are you asking us to give the in this committee to just elect give Donald Trump the electors without having to vote. Speaker 3: Well let me ask you this. Speaker 4: No no I'm I asked you Speaker 3: okay don't ask me the- the people that voted for Republicans in office one of conservative agenda. Independence that voted for Republicans in office one of conservative agenda. That that sort of agenda's been diverted by illegally run elections. Especially, you know, coming from 2020, the presidential election. You know, the the people want their vote to count for who they voted for. And that hasn't happened. And the only way to protect their votes are the people Republican and Democrat. Excuse me, Republican, independent, voted for a conservative agenda, do do not want to see I would imagine, I'm guessing, they don't wanna see a Democrat president. They want a Republican conservative agenda. That's why they voted for Republicans in office. And the only way to protect that is to do to do this. It's the only way to protect the vote for 24. Speaker 4: Madam chair, mister Barnett, Then why do we even have an election at all? Let's just You Speaker 3: don't have to. Why don't we Speaker 4: just let every state just vote their elector and Speaker 3: Well, we can do that. I'm fine with that because we 1st 100 years of the United States, probably half the states appointed the electors, the other half had a popular vote over time. The states went to a popular vote, which I'm perfectly fine with as long as the elections are legally run. The problem is this, they haven't been legally run. And they need to protect our vote to bring back, basically, how elections should be run. And that is with laws constantly broken. They're maladministered. Rules former procedure are shattered. The EPM manual is just completely destroyed. And and that's happened twice in a row. And I don't know how much further we're gonna go along. We have to hear what are we gonna do? Or forget about the past. Let's move on. We gotta move on the next election. I've heard that twice now, and nothing's been fixed. So, like I said, for a variety of reasons. And that's why I'm asking to for the legislature to put their foot down and make sure that something happens to protect our vote. Speaker 4: Madam chair, mister Barnett, Speaker 3: let's say we gave Speaker 4: you what you want, and we in the legislature just bypass the voters, and we immediately give Trump the elector votes no matter what the election results are. Fraudulent or not, we'll just assume. And also in that election, the Democrats get their fondest wish and they seize control of the legislature and get majority in both houses, which I can guarantee you will happen if we do this by the way. But if they got that, are you comfortable with letting them simply nominate the the next democratic president and ignore the voters? Speaker 3: Well, they technically, I I believe that's what happened in 2020 with the illegally run election. Can do you do you not think 2020 was illegally run? Am I confused here? I Speaker 4: I I'm I'm sorry. Speaker 1: I'm just here. Let's go through the chair. Okay. Question? Speaker 4: No. I I I don't need Speaker 1: to ask Speaker 4: a question. Speaker 1: Okay. I mean, do you have a question? Or you're done? You're good? Okay. Okay. Good. Any other questions for the speaker? Okay. Alright. See none, mister vice chair. Is there anyone else trying to speak? Speaker 2: Madam chair

@BarnettforAZ - Josh Barnett-AZ

https://t.co/3mAflP3v9o

Robert_Wessels
Posted - April 3, 2024 at 10:38 AM
Saved - April 3, 2024 at 7:56 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The Maine House passed a bill to allocate electoral votes nationally, disregarding Maine's majority vote. Supporters claim it minimizes Maine's voice, but I haven't heard a convincing argument. This benefits Democrats historically and prioritizes party over the people's voice. Representatives who voted yes should be voted out. The electoral college was meant to support states like Maine.

@Robert_Wessels - Wessels for Governor 🇺🇸

Yesterday the Maine House passed the bill that would have us someday hand over Maine’s electoral votes to the Presidential candidate that receives the most votes nationally…even if Maine overwhelmingly votes for the other candidate. This bill is not imminently impacting, but it shows these legislators true loyalties. I have yet to hear a valid argument that this gives Maine a bigger voice. I have heard (several times) that “this barely minimizes Maine’s voice.” The key is that this likely helps democrats (historically speaking) due to the help of the big city votes. The reality is all YES votes prioritized their political party over the voice of the people of Maine. If this is your rep, they need to be voted out this year. The electoral college was put into place to help states like Maine.

EmeraldRobinson
Posted - April 24, 2024 at 1:28 PM
Saved - April 24, 2024 at 1:41 PM

@EmeraldRobinson - Emerald Robinson ✝️

Why did Democrat governors in Arizona, North Carolina & Wisconsin just veto every election integrity bill that passed through their state legislatures? Because they are going to cheat again in 2024.

OwenGregorian
Posted - May 11, 2024 at 12:14 PM
Saved - May 11, 2024 at 3:38 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
In the 2022 mid-term elections, Democrats gained control of the Michigan Legislature, passing bills that transform election procedures and make it easier to commit fraud. Proposal 2, passed by voters, authorized changes to voting procedures, but the new legislation goes beyond what was authorized. The bills give more power to election clerks and the Secretary of State, reducing safeguards against fraud. The handling and counting of mail-in votes will be difficult to observe, and alleged fraud can no longer be used to request a recount. Michigan Republican legislators opposed these bills, raising concerns about who benefits from the changes.

@OwenGregorian - Owen Gregorian

Voting Shenanigans in Michigan | Eric Dawe In the 2022 mid-term elections in Michigan, voters handed control of the Michigan Legislature to the Democrats, giving them a majority in both the Michigan House of Representatives and the Michigan Senate -- something that hasn’t happened for forty years. Since then, they’ve been working hand in glove with our notorious Democrat governor, Gretchen Whitmer, including passing a slew of bills that significantly transform election procedures in the State of Michigan and make it easier to commit election fraud, while at the same time making it harder to uncover it. ... Back to the story at hand. In November of 2022, Michigan voters also passed Proposal 2, a proposal to amend the voting procedures previously authorized in the State of Michigan’s Constitution. While the proposal passed with (ostensibly) 60% of the vote, the recent batch of bills purportedly written to implement the changes of Proposal 2 goes significantly beyond what was authorized by the voters. The new legislation hands over verification of absentee ballots from an elected bipartisan board of inspectors to city or township clerks. They also significantly expand the powers of election clerks and the Secretary of State. For example, the Secretary of State can now dictate election procedures without going through the formal rule-making process. This greatly increases the potential for fraud and significantly reduces the safeguards against it. Senate Bill 367 allows clerks in municipalities with at least 5,000 people to process and count absentee ballots eight days before Election Day. The eight-day, pre-election day window will make it very difficult for poll watchers to observe the handling and counting of mail-in votes. (What could possibly go wrong there?) Municipalities will work closely with the SoS, to whom the bill assigns the task of unilaterally “supervising the implementation and conduct of early voting for state and federal elections.” (God forbid that the SoS has entrenched political biases.) According to Representative Ruth Johnson (R) Holly, MI, these bills remove every instance of the word ‘fraud’ in the previous law and replace them with the word, ‘error.’ Criminality of intent is thus effectively insulated from prosecution and the ability to address election fraud is stripped away. In fact, under Senate Bills 603 and 604, alleged fraud can no longer be used to request a recount. Perhaps that’s the reason why Michigan Republican legislators were uniformly opposed to these bills. With a Democrat governor, attorney general, and secretary of state, might it not be wise to ask who stands to benefit from these bills that subtly, but significantly, change the state’s previous law and render voting fraud virtually immune from prosecution? Read more: https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2024/05/voting_shenanigins_in_michigan.html

Voting Shenanigans in Michigan In the 2022 mid-term elections in Michigan, voters handed control of the Michigan Legislature to the Democrats, giving them a majority in both the Michigan House of Representatives and the Michigan Senate -- something that hasn’t happened for f... americanthinker.com
NevadaGlobe
Posted - August 14, 2024 at 9:08 PM
Saved - August 14, 2024 at 11:35 PM

@NevadaGlobe - Nevada Globe

Over 100K inactive voters removed from Clark County voter rolls this month. To note: In 2020, 8K ballots were counted despite undeliverable addresses. In 2022, Catherine Cortez Masto beat Adam Laxalt by less than 8K votes. https://thenevadaglobe.com/articles/over-100000-inactive-voters-removed-from-clark-county-voter-rolls/

Over 100,000 Inactive Voters Removed From Clark County Voter Rolls - Nevada Globe Republicans and grass roots activists have successfully challenged Clark County, Nevada, to clean their bloated voter rolls after 8,000+ ballots were thenevadaglobe.com
Chattah4Nevada
Posted - August 14, 2024 at 9:26 PM
Saved - August 14, 2024 at 11:39 PM

@Chattah4Nevada - Sigal Chattah

It took the big guns at the @RNC to Realize the importance of clean voter rolls in Nevada. When Ronna left and 💰 stopped being pissed away on useless consultants- great things starting happening in the Silver State and the @NVGOP has never been stronger. 🇺🇸Here’s to us and a successful 2024🗳️🥂

@NevadaGlobe - Nevada Globe

Over 100K inactive voters removed from Clark County voter rolls this month. To note: In 2020, 8K ballots were counted despite undeliverable addresses. In 2022, Catherine Cortez Masto beat Adam Laxalt by less than 8K votes. https://thenevadaglobe.com/articles/over-100000-inactive-voters-removed-from-clark-county-voter-rolls/

Over 100,000 Inactive Voters Removed From Clark County Voter Rolls - Nevada Globe Republicans and grass roots activists have successfully challenged Clark County, Nevada, to clean their bloated voter rolls after 8,000+ ballots were thenevadaglobe.com
elonmusk
Posted - October 5, 2024 at 4:25 PM
Saved - October 5, 2024 at 9:42 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
If the Democrats win this election, they plan to ban voter ID requirements, which I believe will lead to widespread voter fraud. They’re open about this goal, and if it happens, our votes will lose significance. This is the last real election—vote for @realDonaldTrump to protect democracy!

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

If there is a Democratic Party victory this election, they will ban voter ID requirements nationwide, enabling massive voter fraud. Banning voter ID is their stated goal – they are not hiding it! After that, your vote won’t matter, so this is therefore the last real election. Vote for @realDonaldTrump to save democracy!!

@cb_doge - DogeDesigner

A new law bans California from requiring voters to show ID at the polls. California is one of 14 states that do not require voter ID for elections. Its now impossible to prove fraud in these 14 states. https://t.co/wWsymo9mLM

elonmusk
Posted - October 5, 2024 at 6:30 PM
Saved - October 7, 2024 at 11:47 AM

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

Exactly, the whole country will be like California politically, which is a one-party state

@jasondebolt - Jason DeBolt ⚡️

Democracy is on the ballot for the first time in US history. This is a make or break moment for America. Saying this is the “most important election in US history” is a severe understatement. If Harris wins, there will be NO MORE REAL ELECTIONS, just sham elections from here on out. We get to maybe choose the Democratic primary candidate. Democracy will be dead. Those of us from California know.

elonmusk
Posted - October 28, 2024 at 7:46 PM
Saved - October 28, 2024 at 10:18 PM

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

This is messed up. Vote Republican in Nevada!

@EndWokeness - End Wokeness

BREAKING: NV Supreme Court rules that ballots without postmark arriving 3 days AFTER the election must be counted. A massive blow to election integrity.

mcspacface
Posted - October 28, 2024 at 9:25 PM
Saved - October 29, 2024 at 5:54 AM

@mcspacface - SPAC-ey-McSpacface

This Nevada Supreme Court decision is complete insanity, and needs an immediate SCOTUS challenge. It's literally ENCOURAGING election fraud. https://t.co/EuYegabfNU

BehizyTweets
Posted - October 28, 2024 at 11:09 PM
Saved - October 29, 2024 at 4:33 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I just learned that the RNC has filed an emergency motion with the U.S. Supreme Court to overturn a Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruling that allows defective mail-in ballots to be counted. This ruling could significantly impact tens of thousands of votes, potentially influencing the U.S. Senate and the 2024 Presidential Election. I believe the PA Supreme Court's decision violates the Constitution by undermining state law regarding provisional ballots. The RNC is asking the Supreme Court to pause this ruling and ensure that any defective provisional ballots are counted separately. It's crucial for the Court to address these election integrity issues.

@BehizyTweets - George

BREAKING: The RNC just filed an emergency motion to the U.S. Supreme Court asking them to overturn a ruling from the Pennsylvania Supreme Court that UNLAWFULLY allows defective mail-in ballots to be counted "This case is of paramount public importance, potentially affecting tens of thousands of votes in a State which many anticipate could be decisive in control of the U.S. Senate or even the 2024 Presidential Election." The PA Supreme Court recently created a rule out of thin air, subverting state law to allow erroneous mail-in ballots to be counted via provisional voting. Their ruling, in my opinion, clearly violated Article 1 Section 4 Clause 1 of the Constitution, which enumerates election oversight to state legislatures. Pennsylvania law specifies that “A provisional ballot shall not be counted if the elector’s [mail] ballot is timely received by a county board of elections.” The law does NOT direct election officials to give provisional ballots for mail-in ballots that arrive with a lack of signature, date, or secrecy envelope. Simply put, if a ballot shows up without following the rules, it CANNOT be counted AT ALL. The RNC wants SCOTUS to issue a pause against the PA court's ruling or to issue an order "ordering that any provisional ballot cast by an individual whose mail ballot was timely received but defective (i) be segregated, and kept separate, from all other ballots and (ii) if counted, be counted separately and not included in the official vote tally." The Supreme Court has been derelict in dealing with major election integrity questions. It's time for them to WAKE UP and act for once. Only Justices Gorsuch, Thomas, & Alito have shown consistent interest.

BehizyTweets
Posted - November 4, 2024 at 7:34 PM
Saved - November 5, 2024 at 5:30 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Almost 14,000 mail-in ballots in Nevada lack adequate signatures and won't be counted unless corrected, which is troubling news for Kamala Harris. Democrats are already struggling in Nevada's Early Voting, and this situation will worsen their position. In 2022, 6,000 ballots needing signature cures were not counted. Kamala's team relied heavily on mail-in voting, but it has failed significantly. I urge everyone to vote for Trump tomorrow!

@BehizyTweets - George

BREAKING: Almost 14,000 mail-in ballots in Nevada currently don't have adequate signatures and will NOT be counted unless they're cured. This is devastating news for Kamala Harris. Democrats are already underwater in Nevada's Early Voting. This will make it much worse. For example, in 2022, 6,000 ballots statewide needing a signature cure were not counted. Nothing is going right for Kamala's camp. They placed all their trust in creating a mail-in voting firewall, but it has dramatically FAILED in every way. VOTE FOR TRUMP TOMORROW!

Real_RobN
Posted - November 5, 2024 at 10:57 PM
Saved - November 5, 2024 at 11:44 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I learned that two technical employees in Clark County reported discrepancies with Dominion voting machines. They noticed that the vote counts on USB drives changed overnight after the polls closed, suggesting potential manipulation of the election results.

@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

The Clark County election shenanigans have begun.... “Two Clark County technical employees came forward completely independent of each other, and explained that they discovered that the number of votes recorded by Dominion voting machines stored on USB drives would change between the time the polls were closed at night, and when they were reopened the next morning.” Meaning your government was literally overthrown in the dead of night,

Video Transcript AI Summary
County technical employees reported independently that the vote counts recorded by machines and stored on USB drives changed between the closing of polls and their reopening the next morning. Votes appeared and disappeared overnight. Attempts to verify the integrity of these voting machines were limited to a superficial visual inspection of the USB drives, and a forensic examination was denied.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: County technical employees came forward completely independent of each other and explained that they discovered that the number of votes recorded by voting machines and stored on USB drives would change between the time the polls were closed at night and when they were reopened the next morning. In other words, votes were literally appearing and disappearing in the dead of night. When we attempted to verify the integrity of these voting machines, we were allowed only a useless visual inspection of the outside of a USB drive. We were denied a forensic examination. Finally, our

@iheartmindy - Mindy MF Robinson 🇺🇸

The Nevada Election shenanigans have begun.... Supposedly the election office was closed Sunday...but when my friend showed up to see what they were up to, she noticed a parking lot full of out-of-state plates and sketchy people refusing to explain what they were doing. https://joehoft.com/2024-steal-nv-clark-county-election-office-closed-sunday-but-out-of-state-workers-show-up-and-observers-not-allowed-in/#google_vignette

2024 STEAL NV: Clark County Election Office Closed Sunday But Out of State Workers Show Up and Observers Not Allowed In | Joe Hoft Extremely SUSPICIOUS Activity at the Clark County, Nevada Elections Office on Sunday Before Election Guest post from Martel Maxim It's Sunday afternoon, just two days before the Election of a Lifetime that will determine if America lives or dies, and something isn't quite right in the County where the world famous city of Las Vegas joehoft.com
charliekirk11
Posted - November 8, 2024 at 8:31 PM
Saved - November 9, 2024 at 1:42 PM

@charliekirk11 - Charlie Kirk

To all those states that signed onto the interstate agreement to award electoral votes for President of the United States by national popular vote...now's your chance! https://t.co/6DtFEIjfLd

elonmusk
Posted - January 3, 2025 at 2:54 PM
Saved - January 3, 2025 at 5:07 PM

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

The Democrats oppose voter ID so that they can commit voting fraud and not get caught. It’s that simple.

@amuse - @amuse

Why do Democrats oppose voter ID? https://t.co/EbArWhQW2P

elonmusk
Posted - January 3, 2025 at 6:25 PM
Saved - January 3, 2025 at 11:13 PM

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

It is now illegal to show your ID even in local elections in California. The reason they’re doing this is to make voting fraud unprovable. 🤡🌎

@libsoftiktok - Libs of TikTok

Last year, Gavin Newsom signed a law banning local governments from passing laws requiring ID to vote. The law went into effect this week. California cannot require ID to vote. Democrats do not want secure elections. Wonder why... 🤔 https://t.co/5qiyOxtwAa

The1Parzival
Posted - January 29, 2025 at 12:49 AM
Saved - February 1, 2025 at 7:43 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I'm setting the record straight about California. Despite the state's reputation for leaning Democratic, over 6 million Americans voted for Trump, representing 7.9% of his total votes in the 2024 election. California holds 54 electoral votes, yet many of these voters feel their voices are silenced. There's been a push for the State of Jefferson to give these voters representation, but it faced significant resistance. Before criticizing California, consider the number of Trump supporters who feel overlooked. It’s time to address the system that marginalizes them.

@The1Parzival - THE PARZIVAL

🧠🧠🧠 CRITICAL THINKING: - I'm going to set the record straight for everyone including our politicians. - Everyone hates on California because the electoral votes always go to Democrats. - However, there are ton of American Loving Patriots in California with over 6 Million people voting for Trump. - This represents 7.9% of all the votes cast for Donald Trump in the 2024 Election, which is close to the same numbers seen in Florida and Texas. - California represents 54 Electoral Votes out of 538 total, which is 10% of the Electoral College. - So essentially there over 6 million people that never get to make an impact in State or Federal elections. - They represent 7.9% of all Trump Voters in a State with 10% of the Electoral College and they yet their votes make ZERO IMPACT. - This has long been an issue people in California understand and is why there was a push by many Counties to form the State of Jefferson, which would have succeeded from California and be represented as a brand new State. - Obviously there was a ton of resistance at the State and Federal levels and the idea was basically killed. - This is so the Democrats can maintain their stranglehold on the entire Electoral College of California, keeping those 6 million people ever from really having a voice and tipping the scales always in favor of Democrats. - So before everyone wants to go bashing California because the state is ruined by Democrats consider for a moment how many Trump loving Patriots actually live there. - Hey .@RepMTG are you still good with over 6 million Americans who voted for trump getting dumped so you can play political theater? - Maybe your time would be better used to help fix the broken system in California thats keeps these 6 Million people from being heard, just a thought.

@RepMTG - Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸

California Secretary of State has approved a campaign to gather signatures for a petition calling for a vote on if California should secede from the U.S. and become an independent country. Go ahead. That would mean 43 Democrats in the U.S. House of Representatives would be GONE, giving House Republicans a HUGE majority! And 2 California Democrat U.S. Senators would be GONE making the Republican Senate majority STRONGER. AND if California secedes, the next Democrat presidential candidate would lose California’s 54 electoral college votes. California TDS patients could lead to their own demise. I’m here for it. FAFO.

BasedSamParker
Posted - June 7, 2025 at 4:51 PM
Saved - June 7, 2025 at 7:13 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe the 17th Amendment fundamentally altered the relationship between the federal government and the states, effectively seceding the federal government from state control. This shift has empowered Big Money interests, undermining the original intent of our government. The Senate, House, and Supreme Court have all been re-engineered to serve this new power structure, leaving the people and states without proper representation. I advocate for significant reforms, including expanding the House and potentially splitting states to restore effective governance and representation.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

1/ THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IS A SECEDED ENTITY While @DataRepublican's analysis on the 17th amendment below is correct, I've found a much better & clearer way to say it: ▶️ The Federal Government *SECEDED* from the States with the 17th Amendment (1913). ◀️ The 17th amendment removed the tether keeping it connected to, and under the control of, the States because the state legislatures had appointed Senators up to that point. For all intents and purposes, this was literally a secession. This rogue "Seceded Entity" uses the 16th Amendment (1913, income tax), the Revenue Act (1913, income tax, beefed up/police-state IRS), and the Federal Reserve (1913) to fund itself, bypassing The States and The People (while abusing both). We live under a completely new government and tyranny since 1913. This cannot be understated. 🔻DETAILED EXPLANATION FOR WONKS (Bookmark this essay 🔖) 🔻 ▪️Senate Whereas Senators were once appointed by State legislatures, they're now voted on directly by the people. What this did was shift power from the Sovereign States to the Big Money who funds campaigns. Before, to buy a Senator, you had to buy an entire State legislature--which was then accountable to local voting constituents. Now, the real backers of Senators just buy media coverage and votes. Because the bar was so high to buy a Senator, it rendered members of the House not worth much: if you don't control the Senators' votes from a particular state, the votes of its Representatives were of far smaller value. This took money out of both Senate campaigns (which were conducted inside state legislatures), and House campaigns (which were worthless without controlling the Senators, too. A very high bar.). Previous to the 17th Amendment, congressional campaigns were *SIGNIFICANTLY* less expensive. The 17th Amendment changed all that, EXPLODING the money it takes to run campaigns. This puts Big Money Interests firmly in control. ▪️House of Representatives The Senate was not the only Federal entity re-engineered, so was the House. The Apportionment Act of 1911 set the house size at 433 (2 more would be added for the newly created states AZ & NM in 1912, bringing it to 435), which all took effect for the first time in 1913! (There's that year again). This 435 size was then formally & perpetually set in stone with the Reappointment Act of 1929. It's all unconstitutional, since the Constitution calls for 1 Representative for every 30,000 people. What this means is that the House is now unresponsive to the changes in American population, essentially disconnecting it from the The People and placing it, too, under Big Money elections, as I noted above. ▪️Supreme Court While the 16th & 17th Amendments are technically "Constitutional," the Reappointment Act is not. Why hasn't anything been done about it? Because the Supreme Court has ruled it "non-justiciable," meaning SCOTUS says it's something they can't rule on. 😂 They rule on all kinds of stuff when they shouldn't. Never stopped them before! Basically, the Supreme Court has decided to collude with its 2 Federal Counterparts--The Senate & The House--as part of the runaway, rogue, Seceded Entity known as the "US Federal Government." And we can't stop it, either, because the State legislatures are no longer in charge of approving Supreme Court justices or removing them via the impeachment process! (Thanks, 17th amendment!) ▪️Executive (POTUS/Cabinet Depts) The Executive of this Rogue Seceded Entity now is essentially given ever-expanding powers, kept in check only occasionally by its Colluding Partners in the House, Senate & Supreme Court when they want a bigger piece of their power-loving secessionist pie. The President's campaign is powered by the Big Money, who buys the election, buys the Cabinet (no longer accountable to the State legislatures), buys the Supreme Court (no longer accountable to the State legislatures), and buys the laws in Congress and the policies in its authorized bureaucracies. The Electoral College, which elects the President, is now ever more firmly under the control of Organized Big Money (addressed more at length in another thread linked below). CONCLUSION The Constitution was torn up, US Founding Federalism destroyed, and a coup d'état perpetrated in 1913--and we're all just pretending we still live under the government our Founders created. We do not. A foreign entity now rules us. You can couch it in abstractions like "it changed how Americans relate to their government," but that misses the point: it changed how we relate to the government because it literally replaced our government! We are the "United States Of America" in name only. But that's not really what we are. We're actually the "Vassalized States and Enslaved People Of The Federal Government Of America Owned By Transnational Big Money Interests." They swapped out the government, swapped out the locus of power, and kept the name. That's the tea. 🔻SUMMARY🔻 The 16th & 17th Amendments + the Federal Reserve Act & Revenue Act + The Frozen House--all done in 1913--seceded the Federal Government and shifted the locus of power from The People & The States to The Big Money Interests. ▪️The 16th enslaved The People. ▪️The 17th seceded the Federal Government from the States and made The States vassals. ▪️The Fed & Big Money became the new locus of power, buying elections, the cabinet, laws & policies, & the Supreme Court ▪️The Supreme Court is firmly on the side of the Rogue, Seceded Entity ▪️All 3 branches work together to expand their power and reach because they're no longer checked by The States or The People. It cannot be understated how fundamentally the 17th Amendment helped transform America. (more threads below)

@DataRepublican - DataRepublican (small r)

TL;DR: the 17th fundamentally changed how Americans relate to their government. Before it, the United States operated more like a confederation of semi-sovereign states, similar to what the EU was intended to be. After it, the balance shifted. For the first time, the federal government was directly influenced by popular national will, bypassing the states' formal control over the Senate. It was by far the most significant step toward centralizing power in DC... changing us from a union of states into a more unified, singular nation-state.

@chingers4 - chingers

@DataRepublican @COSProject Why repeal the 17th?

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

2/ Thread that delves more deeply into how the 17th Amendment destroyed the Senate and American government: https://t.co/a6pQQEAgE1

@SamParkerSenate - Sam Parker 🇺🇲

1. *Thread* A short explanation of "Bicameralism"--one of our founding governing principals DESTROYED by the 17th Amendment. Its elimination was a major factor in enabling the Federal Gov to be captured by a small group of powerful & rich forces, i.e. the "Ruling Elites." https://t.co/jEhqPucJH9

@SamParkerSenate - Sam Parker 🇺🇲

*The 17th amendment made the senate not have reason to exist. https://t.co/sKFBx8Y34w

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

3/ How the Electoral College was destroyed and doesn't work how it was intended: https://t.co/xAfPKkLzOH

@SamParkerSenate - Sam Parker 🇺🇲

Thread: Electoral College 1. Relatively speaking, almost no one knows the full theory & history behind the EC. In this thread, we will review the EC: -The original reasons for its conception, & -How, if restored, it could mitigate many of the problems we experience today. https://t.co/MQxn0vRpyK

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

4/ Short thread on the runaway Supreme Court and a strategy for dealing with it: https://t.co/HbbW99yzvj

@SamParkerSenate - Sam Parker 🇺🇲

***Short thread on how to deal w/John Roberts's SCOTUS tyranny*** 1. Many know Marbury v. Madison (1803) established the doctrine of Judicial Review. Almost no non-lawyers know that the 2nd case of judicial review didn't occur until the Dred Scott case (1857). Why the 54-yr gap?

@michaeljknowles - Michael Knowles

If only we had one more conservative justice! (This tweet will age well.)

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

5/ Extensive thread describing the problem with the House of Representatives and strategies for fixing it: https://t.co/3IrcEzTkcz

@SamParkerSenate - Sam Parker 🇺🇲

1. This is 100% correct. The house should be expanded. Radically. Here are the benefits/drawbacks of more/fewer representives: and they are Many. Remember that along w/more Reps comes smaller districts. https://t.co/ExD0G4Tpxq

@UncapTheHouse - Uncap the House

It doesn’t get said enough: the reason you are dissatisfied with Congress is because it’s too small to properly represent you — not too big.

@BasedSamParker - Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

6/ We need to split up many states. I advocate for a new total of about 125. We used to create new territories & states in order to accommodate growth & maintain representative gov. But the US has done NOTHING to accommodate a century of growth. https://t.co/N6wycpkPdO https://t.co/gwJsOvs8il

@SamParkerSenate - Sam Parker 🇺🇲

11. I'm going to keep these last points brief & will explain them in greater detail in the future: A) We should split several states--notably NY, CA, TX, FL, WA, OR, IL, MD, PA, VA, GA, MI, NC, NJ & OH. ~75 states B) #RepealThe17th amendment C) Triple the senate (2/state to 6)

RealLindellTV
Posted - October 14, 2025 at 11:43 PM
Saved - October 15, 2025 at 3:42 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I report that Arkansas AG charged Col. Conrad Reynolds, a decorated Army veteran who led Independence County’s move to hand-counted paper ballots, with a rarely enforced misdemeanor for alleged "exit polling violations." He faces booking tomorrow at 9 AM and calls it political payback. National figures decry GOP lawfare, with Reynolds linked to Trump’s election-security efforts. Voters approved paper ballots by 63%.

@RealLindellTV - LindellTV

BREAKING: Arkansas AG Files Charges Against Col. Conrad Reynolds - Conservatives Call It GOP Lawfare Decorated Army veteran Col. Conrad Reynolds is under criminal prosecution after leading Independence County’s successful vote to return to hand-counted paper ballots. He now faces a rarely enforced misdemeanor over so-called "exit polling violations." Reynolds will report for booking tomorrow at 9AM. He calls it political payback: “They’re terrified of losing control of the election system.” National backlash is mounting: @realMikeLindell: “Colonel Reynolds is a hero.” @GenFlynn: “GOP lawfare… Sarah Huckabee, stop this persecution.” @SidneyPowell1: “This is ridiculous and obviously lawfare.” @RogerJStoneJr: “Why is Arkansas targeting a patriot pushing for paper ballots?” @ColonelReynolds, who holds a top secret clearance and will soon be inducted into the Arkansas Military Veterans Hall of Fame, has worked closely with @realDonaldTrump’s team on election security. Why is a red state criminalizing election reform its own voters approved by 63%?

Video Transcript AI Summary
Arkansas Attorney General Tim Griffin faces growing scrutiny after filing charges against Colonel Conrad Reynolds, the decorated army veteran who led Independence County’s vote to return to hand counted paper ballots. Prosecutors accuse him of violating "exit polling laws," a rarely enforced misdemeanor, after organizing a ballot referendum that overwhelmingly passed with 63% of voters choosing paper ballots over machines. Reynolds, soon to be inducted into the Arkansas Military Veterans Hall of Fame, has been a national leader in election reform, working closely with members of President Trump’s team in Washington on election security and vulnerabilities in voting systems. He continues to hold a top secret security clearance, which includes routine polygraph examinations. Reynolds says the prosecution is politically motivated and that the "establishment is trying to stop the paper ballot movement before it spreads to other counties. They're terrified of losing control of the election system," end quote. The controversy raises a broader question inside Arkansas: why would a Republican administration led by governor Sarah Huckabee Sanders oppose the very hand counted paper ballot system that grassroots conservatives overwhelmingly supported? State officials have not publicly responded. The case has drawn sharp national criticism. Mike Lindell said, "please share." Reynolds is described as a hero and is claimed to be "guilty of trying to save our country and get to paper ballots hand counted." General Michael Flynn wrote on x, "this is GOP law fair, and it must end." Sarah Huckabee, please step in and stop this ridiculous persecution. Attorney Sydney Powell posted, "what the hell? Sarah Huckabee, this prosecution is ridiculous and obviously lawfare." Attorney general Tim Griffin, "exit polling is not election engineering." Political strategist Roger Stone shared, "top MAGA leaders are asking governor Sarah Huckabee why Arkansas indicted colonel Conrad Reynolds, a proponent of paper ballots." Reynolds’ attorney, Chris Corbett, calls the prosecution political payback, saying, "it's law fair, targeting a decorated army veteran because he's been effective." Reynolds has "worked tirelessly to strengthen election security in Arkansas and across the nation, and now he's being punished for it," end quote. Reynolds will appear tomorrow morning at 9AM at the Independence Courthouse in Bateville, Arkansas to be booked, fingerprinted, and photographed, an image that his supporters say will symbolize courage in the growing national paper ballot movement. Reporting at the White House for Lindell TV, Kara Kashtanova.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Arkansas attorney general Tim Griffin is under growing scrutiny after filing charges against decorated army veteran, colonel Conrad Reynolds, the man who led Independence County's vote to return to hand counted paper ballots. National conservative leaders say it looks like GOP lawfare inside a red state. Reynolds is expected to report to the Independence County Courthouse tomorrow morning for booking. Prosecutors accuse him of violating, quote, exit polling laws, a rarely enforced misdemeanor, after organizing a ballot referendum that overwhelmingly passed with 63% of voters choosing paper ballots over machines. Colonel Reynolds, soon to be inducted into the Arkansas Military Veterans Hall of Fame, has been a national leader in election reform. He has worked closely with members of president Trump's team in Washington DC on election security and national defense vulnerabilities in voting systems. Reynolds continues to hold a top secret security clearance, which includes routine polygraph examinations. Reynolds says that the prosecution is politically motivated and the, quote, establishment is trying to stop the paper ballot movement before it spreads to other counties. They're terrified of losing control of the election system, end quote. The controversy is raising a broader question inside Arkansas. Why would a Republican administration led by governor Sarah Huckabee Sanders oppose the very hand counted paper ballot system that grassroot conservatives overwhelmingly supported? State officials have not publicly responded. The case has drawn sharp national criticism. Mike Lindell said, please share. Colonel Reynolds is a hero and is guilty of trying to save our country and get to paper ballots hand counted. General Michael Flynn wrote on x, this is GOP law fair, and it must end. Sarah Huckabee, please step in and stop this ridiculous persecution. Attorney Sydney Powell posted, what the hell? Sarah Huckabee, this prosecution is ridiculous and obviously lawfare. Attorney general Tim Griffin, exit polling is not election engineering. Were it anyone other than an advocate for hand counted ballots, you would have ignored it. Political strategist Roger Stone shared a video captioned, quote, top MAGA leaders are asking governor Sarah Huckabee why Arkansas indicted colonel Conrad Reynolds, a proponent of paper ballots. Reynolds attorney Chris Corbett calls the prosecution political payback. He said, quote, it's law fair, targeting a decorated army veteran because he's been effective. Colonel Reynolds has worked tirelessly to strengthen election security in Arkansas and across the nation, and now he's being punished for it, end quote. Reynolds will appear tomorrow morning at 9AM at the Independence Courthouse in Bateville, Arkansas to be booked, fingerprinted, and photographed, an image that his supporters say will symbolize courage in the growing national paper ballot movement. Reporting at the White House for Lindell TV, I'm Kara Kashtanova.
DecentFiJC
Posted - October 23, 2023 at 12:02 PM
Saved - October 23, 2023 at 4:12 PM

@DecentFiJC - Jonathan

“Do you stand with Israel?!?!” “I’ll GLADLY ‘Stand With Israel™️’ as soon as ISRAEL comes clean about its role in helping Katie Hobbs steal the 2022 AZ gubernatorial race from Arizonans. And then identifies EVERY player involved in the steal and helps us take them down. But not a moment sooner.”

View Full Interactive Feed