reSee.it - Related Post Feed
@MamaTatiana_ - Mama Tatiana 🕊
*Flashback* The Propaganda of Terror and Fear: A Lesson from Recent History 28 March 2020 By Dr Piers Robinson, Co-Director Organisation for Propaganda Studies https://off-guardian.org/2020/03/28/the-propaganda-of-terror-and-fear-a-lesson-from-recent-history/ @PiersRobinson1 @OffGuardian0
The Propaganda of Terror and Fear: A Lesson from Recent History
The ongoing and unfolding reactions to the Corona Virus look set to have wide ranging and long-lasting effect on politics, society and economics. The drive to close down all activities is extraordi…
off-guardian.org
reSee.it AI Summary
As we continue to navigate the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, it's important to reflect on the decisions and actions taken by those in power. A real inquiry into the response to COVID would investigate many disturbing questions that have yet to be fully answered.
One such question is why the CDC suddenly adopted social distancing measures in 2004. Additionally, who exported the concept of lockdowns to Liberia and Sierra Leone in 2014? These are important questions that need to be addressed in order to fully understand the decisions made during the pandemic.
Another concerning issue is why pandemic plans were not followed. It's important to understand why these plans were not implemented and what could have been done differently to better prepare for a pandemic.
Furthermore, why were health security officials talking about curfews of indefinite duration by February 24, 2020? This raises questions about the extent of government control and the potential infringement on individual rights.
Additionally, why were beaches and other outdoor spaces closed? It's important to understand the reasoning behind these decisions and whether they were truly necessary.
Finally, why were so many federal officials so intimately involved in the censorship of dissenting COVID opinions on social media? This raises concerns about freedom of speech and the potential for censorship to be used as a tool of those in power.
Without answers to these questions, democracy is at risk. It's important to continue to investigate and hold those in power accountable for their actions during the pandemic. For more information on this topic, visit https://michaelpsenger.substack.com/p/nuremberg-ii-what-a-real-inquiry.
@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger
THREAD – Nuremberg 2: What a Real Inquiry into the Response to COVID Would Look Like Given the magnitude of the harm that’s been done, the public deserves to know exactly who knew and did what, when, and why in the days leading up to the lockdowns of spring 2020 and beyond. 1/
@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger
Though it may not be politically feasible, ideally an inquiry into the response to COVID would take the form of an international tribunal. Below are just some of the many disturbing questions to which any leader who claims to represent the public ought to demand answers. 2/
Video Transcript AI Summary
The top leaders were convicted despite not directly committing the crimes. There was no international court, body of law, judges, or courthouse at the time. They had to start from scratch. A lawyer named Marie Bernays devised a philosophy for the trial, the conspiracy theory. It claimed that the Nazi movement was not just a political movement, but a criminal conspiracy to seize territory, steal wealth, exterminate Jews, etc. Being part of the Nazi leadership meant being part of this criminal conspiracy.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But what about the top leaders? How did you convict them? None of them, shot the bank guard, blew the safe, or drove the getaway car. Their hands were clean. There existed no international, court.
There there existed at the time, they were preparing for the trial, no body of law. There existed no judges. There existed no courthouse. The the instruments for trying, a drunk driver in any part of the United States were more complete than the instruments for trying mass murderers in Europe at the end of World War 2. So they started from scratch.
A lawyer in the war department by the name of Marie Bernays was given the task of devising some kind of of philosophy for this trial. Bernays came up with a brilliant idea, which was the conspiracy theory. That the whole Nazi See, movement was just not simply a legitimate political movement, but it was a criminal conspiracy designed to seize the territory of Germany's neighbors, to steal from these nations their wealth and their people and to exterminate their Jews. And this conspiracy theory meant that by being a part of the Nazi leadership, you were part of a criminal conspiracy, and it was a net that held
@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger
1. Why did the CDC suddenly adopt “measures to increase social distance” as official policy in 2004, contrary to all the epidemiological guidance it had developed throughout the 20th century? 3/ https://michaelpsenger.substack.com/p/the-real-story-of-the-birth-of-social
The REAL Story of the Birth of ‘Social Distancing’ — the Western Term for Lockdown (封锁)
That ‘social distancing’ arose from a school science project appears to be an elaborate cover story for the fact the concept was lifted directly from China’s lockdown measures during SARS in 2003.
michaelpsenger.substack.com
@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger
2. Who was behind the campaign to export the concept of “lockdown” to Liberia and Sierra Leone in 2014? 4/ https://michaelpsenger.substack.com/p/bombshell-template-to-export-lockdowns
Bombshell: Template to Export Lockdowns Existed by 2014
Bots supported Sierra Leone’s unprecedented lockdowns in 2014 and 2015 with millions of posts specifically using the word “lockdown.”
michaelpsenger.substack.com
@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger
3. Some intelligence reports have indicated that members of the western national security community were aware a new virus had emerged in China by fall 2019. What was being said about the virus at that time? 5/ https://michaelpsenger.substack.com/p/the-earliest-events-of-the-covid
The Earliest Events of the COVID Coup
Will Jones at the Daily Sceptic has written a peerless synopsis of the individuals, institutions, and events involved in the earliest days of the response to COVID—at least, that we know of so far. Our perspectives on these events differ in certain respects. At a high level, Jones tends to treat the Chinese government as an ordinary government, whereas I consider it best to think of the Chinese Communist Party, like other totalitarian regimes, as a
michaelpsenger.substack.com
@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger
4. If some national security officials had been worrying about a new virus in China since fall 2019, how could they have possibly believed China’s two-month lockdown of Wuhan eliminated the virus several months later? 6/ https://michaelpsenger.substack.com/p/lockdown-is-a-national-security-catastrophe
Lockdown is a National Security Catastrophe
or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Biosecurity State
michaelpsenger.substack.com
@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger
5. By January 2020, tips began to emerge that the World Health Organization was planning to recreate China’s lockdowns across the world, starting in Italy. When and on what basis did the World Health Organization make this decision? 7/ https://michaelpsenger.substack.com/p/the-dragnet-in-lombardy-italy-patient
The Dragnet in Lombardy, Italy: Patient Zero of Lockdowns
The Manifesto of Health Minister Roberto Speranza
michaelpsenger.substack.com
@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger
6. Lockdowns had been ruled out by the pandemic plans of the WHO and every developed nation. Why weren’t these pandemic plans followed? 8/ https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/news/articles/masked-ball-cowardice
Just a moment...
tabletmag.com
@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger
7. Why were health security officials talking about “curfews of indefinite duration” by February 24, 2020? 9/ https://multipolar-magazin.de/artikel/how-the-lockdown-came-to-germany
How the lockdown came to Germany
On the role of privately funded networks in the run-up to the corona crisis
multipolar-magazin.de
@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger
8. Why does the WHO’s February 2020 report rely on flagrant logical fallacies in its promulgation of China’s lockdown measures as global policy? 10/ https://www.aier.org/article/whats-behind-the-whos-lockdown-mixed-messaging/
What’s Behind The WHO’s Lockdown Mixed-Messaging
"Tedros aligned himself not with democracies and their fundamental principles but with an autocratic dictatorship, the same dictatorship that helped him assume power within the WHO. Together, using logical fallacies and pseudo-science, they betrayed international law governing human rights, the...
aier.org
@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger
9. Why was the current Director of National Intelligence sitting next to China’s CDC director at the Event 201 simulation of a coronavirus pandemic in October 2019, just weeks before a real coronavirus pandemic emerged? 11/ https://michaelpsenger.substack.com/p/the-prophetic-monkeypox-simulation
The Prophetic Monkeypox Simulation
First-ever global Monkeypox outbreak happens in exact week predicted in biosecurity simulation a year prior
michaelpsenger.substack.com
@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger
10. Former White House COVID Coordinator Deborah Birx has made conflicting statements about how she got her job. The former Deputy National Security Advisor offered her a job in the White House as far back as Nov 2019. How was Birx chosen for this? 12/ https://brownstone.org/articles/how-did-deborah-birx-get-the-job/
How Did Deborah Birx Get the Job? ⋆ Brownstone Institute
The most revealing parts of the book are the claims about Birx herself that, upon close inspection, make little sense
brownstone.org
@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger
11. Who was behind the terror campaign of fake videos showing Wuhan residents spontaneously dying and convulsing in the streets in January and February 2020? 13/ https://www.revolver.news/2021/02/how-phony-coronavirus-fear-videos-were-used-as-psychological-weapons-to-bring-america-to-her-knees/
How Phony Coronavirus “Fear Videos” Were Used as Psychological Weapons to Bring America to Her Knees - Revolver News
Phony coronavirus fear videos imported from China are making us wonder whether this whole thing was one giant psy-op.
revolver.news
@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger
12. Why is there no record of the hero doctor Li Wenliang before he appeared in Chinese state media at the end of January 2020? On what basis did western media outlets adopt this story as true? 14/ https://redstate.com/michael_thau/2021/01/12/308650-n308650
'Investigate China's Global Lockdown Fraud!' Demand Lawyers, Retired Brig. Gen. in Open Letter to FBI
The timeline and activities are a tad suspicious.
redstate.com
@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger
13. High-level national security officials have stated that Covid came from a lab in Wuhan. At the same time, high-level scientific officials have stated it is “molecularly impossible” for Covid to have come from there. Why the disconnect? 15/ https://michaelpsenger.substack.com/p/drastic-founder-renounces-lab-leak
DRASTIC Founder Renounces Lab Leak Theory of COVID’s Origins
The testimony of DRASTIC founder J.J. Couey provides powerful firsthand insight into the perpetuation of the lab leak theory as a controlled opposition narrative.
michaelpsenger.substack.com
@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger
14. Why has overwhelming peer-reviewed evidence that COVID was already spreading globally by fall 2019 been so widely downplayed by federal officials and major media outlets? 16/ https://michaelpsenger.substack.com/p/leading-virologists-wrongfully-assumed
Leading Virologists Wrongfully Assumed Covid Began in Wuhan in December 2019 in Major New Study
Something rotten in the state of virology…
michaelpsenger.substack.com
@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger
15. Reports have revealed that military leaders saw COVID as a unique opportunity to test propaganda techniques on the public. Who advised western leaders to use military-grade propaganda on their own people? 17/ https://nationalpost.com/news/national/defence-watch/military-leaders-saw-pandemic-as-unique-opportunity-to-test-propaganda-techniques-on-canadians-forces-report-says/wcm/22733c97-39f0-4ba4-8a26-478af5e215f3
Military leaders saw pandemic as unique opportunity to test propaganda on Canadians: report
A plan devised by the Canadian Joint Operations Command relied on propaganda techniques similar to those employed during the Afghanistan war.
nationalpost.com
@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger
16. Some officials in the UK later expressed contrition about the fear campaigns that the UK Government used on its own people to convince them to support Covid mandates. How was the decision to use these fear campaigns made? 18/ https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2021/05/14/scientists-admit-totalitarian-use-fear-control-behaviour-covid/
Use of fear to control behaviour in Covid crisis was ‘totalitarian’, admit scientists
Members of Scientific Pandemic Influenza Group on Behaviour express regret about ‘unethical’ methods
telegraph.co.uk
@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger
17. Who was behind the massive bot and astroturf campaigns to popularize lockdowns among western citizens and officials in March 2020? 19/ https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/news/articles/china-covid-lockdown-propaganda
Just a moment...
tabletmag.com
@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger
18. How many deaths were caused by the WHO’s initial guidance on mechanical ventilators, which cited Chinese journal articles advising ventilators as the “first choice” for those hospitalized with Covid? 20/ https://michaelpsenger.substack.com/p/an-estimated-30000-americans-were
An Estimated 30,000 Americans Were Killed by Ventilators & Iatrogenesis in April 2020
Reexamining excess deaths during peak lockdown
michaelpsenger.substack.com
@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger
19. The initial guidance from the WHO advised using mechanical ventilators not necessarily for the patient’s benefit, but to control the spread of the virus. Why was the WHO advising doctors to violate the Hippocratic Oath? 21/ https://www.wsj.com/articles/hospitals-retreat-from-early-covid-treatment-and-return-to-basics-11608491436
Hospitals Retreat From Early Covid Treatment and Return to Basics
Changing practices, based on data and experience, appear to be improving outcomes for the sickest coronavirus patients
wsj.com
@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger
20. Why were numerous, credible predictions of famine, human rights disasters, and economic collapse as a result of lockdowns ignored at the time they were implemented? 22/ https://brownstone.org/articles/governments-were-given-credible-warnings-about-lockdown-harms-but-didnt-listen/
Governments Were Given Credible Warnings about Lockdown Harms but Didn’t Listen ⋆ Brownstone Institute
Instead of conducting and publishing rigorous cost-benefit analyses, governments and ministries of health turned into Covid-only bureaus
brownstone.org
@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger
21. Why was natural immunity to COVID so long downplayed? 23/ https://brownstone.org/articles/the-psychological-cruelty-of-denying-natural-immunity/
The Psychological Cruelty of Denying Natural immunity ⋆ Brownstone Institute
Take away the knowledge of natural immunity, and thus the realization that there can be a better life on the other side of sickness, and you leave people with existential emptiness and a lasting sense of despair. No one can live that way. No one should have to.
brownstone.org
@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger
22. Why were initial seroprevalence studies demonstrating COVID’s ubiquity downplayed? 24/ https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.04.14.20062463v1
COVID-19 Antibody Seroprevalence in Santa Clara County, California
medRxiv - The Preprint Server for Health Sciences
medrxiv.org
@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger
23. Why were beaches and other outdoor spaces closed? 25/ https://michaelpsenger.substack.com/p/lockdowns-the-great-gaslighting
Lockdowns: The Great Gaslighting
The lockdowns of 2020 were very real. And few opposed them.
michaelpsenger.substack.com
@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger
24. Why was the public kept in the dark about low early estimates of COVID’s infection fatality rate? 26/ https://www.statnews.com/2020/03/17/a-fiasco-in-the-making-as-the-coronavirus-pandemic-takes-hold-we-are-making-decisions-without-reliable-data/
A fiasco in the making? As the coronavirus pandemic takes hold, we are making decisions without reliable data
Countermeasures like social distancing may help stop the spread of Covid-19. But how can policymakers tell if they are doing more good than harm? Data!
statnews.com
@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger
25. What was the source of the guidance to move patients who were still sick into nursing homes? 27/ https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/department-justice-requesting-data-governors-states-issued-covid-19-orders-may-have-resulted
Department of Justice Requesting Data From Governors of States that Issued COVID-19 Orders that May Have Resulted in Deaths of Elderly Nursing Home Residents
Today the Justice Department requested COVID-19 data from the governors of states that issued orders which may have resulted in the deaths of thousands of elderly nursing home residents. New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and Michigan required nursing homes to admit COVID-19 patients to their vulnerable populations, often without adequate testing.
justice.gov
@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger
26. Remdesivir and midazolam were initially widely used, but didn’t lead to positive health outcomes. How was the decision made to use these over other treatment protocols? 28/ https://www.science.org/content/article/very-very-bad-look-remdesivir-first-fda-approved-covid-19-drug
The ‘very, very bad look' of remdesivir, the first FDA-approved COVID-19 drug
The Food and Drug Administration held no advisory meeting on antiviral, and the European Union signed contract without knowing of failed trial
science.org
@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger
27. Leading officials have made conflicting statements as to whether the goal of lockdowns was to eliminate the virus, slow the spread, or buy time for vaccines. What was the actual goal they had in mind at the time they implemented these policies? 29/ https://thedispatch.com/article/our-failed-covid-response/
Our Failed COVID Response
If, God forbid, we face another pandemic, we cannot use our COVID strategy as the baseline.
thedispatch.com
@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger
28. Why did key public health officials make statements about using the response to COVID to advance non-health-related policy goals? 30/ https://dailysceptic.org/2022/08/05/neil-ferguson-china-and-a-fanatical-socialist-health-minister-the-untold-story-of-how-lockdowns-came-to-italy-and-the-west/
Neil Ferguson, China and a Fanatical Socialist Health Minister: The Untold Story of How Lockdowns Came to Italy and the West – The Daily Sceptic
The free world's first lockdowns were imposed on towns in Lombardy, Italy, on February 21st 2020 by Health Minister Roberto Speranza. What influences lay behind his momentous decision?
dailysceptic.org
@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger
29. How was the decision made to suppress and censor scientific opinions that dissented from lockdowns? 31/ https://www.wsj.com/articles/fauci-collins-emails-great-barrington-declaration-covid-pandemic-lockdown-11640129116
Opinion | How Fauci and Collins Shut Down Covid Debate
They worked with the media to trash the Great Barrington Declaration.
wsj.com
@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger
30. Why were so many federal officials so intimately involved in the censorship of dissenting COVID opinions on social media? 32/ https://michaelpsenger.substack.com/p/faucis-red-guards-lawsuit-reveals
Fauci’s Red Guards: Lawsuit Reveals Vast Federal Censorship Army
“This evidence suggests we are uncovering the most serious, coordinated, and large-scale violation of First Amendment free speech rights by the federal government’s executive branch in US history.”
michaelpsenger.substack.com
@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger
31. Why were social media executives given Top Secret US Security Clearances for purposes of censoring content, and what was the vetting process, if any, for these clearances? 33/ https://michaelpsenger.substack.com/p/fbi-agent-elvis-chan-gave-twitter
FBI Agent Elvis Chan Gave Twitter Execs Top Secret Clearance in Advance of 2020 Election
New internal documents from Twitter, revealed today as part of Elon Musk’s “Twitter Files” series, show FBI Agent Elvis Chan arranged for Top Secret security clearance—the highest level of US national security clearance—to be granted to Twitter executives for the purpose of facilitating the censorship of suspected misinformation in advance of the 2020 election.
michaelpsenger.substack.com
@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger
32. Why were federal officials working so closely with Twitter to censor legal speech by American citizens while an AI expert with deep ties to the military of America’s chief adversary was on Twitter’s Board of Directors? 34/ https://www.jenniferzengblog.com/home/2020/5/25/twitters-new-director-has-ccp-ties-deeper-than-you-know-fei-fei-li
Twitter's New Director has CCP Ties Deeper Than You Know: Fei-fei Li — Jennifer's World
So, to put it simply, CCP’s police team and the team of the largest
surveillance equipment manufacturer were given top prizes at the ImageNet’s
competition, and ImageNet was founded by Li Fei-fei.
jenniferzengblog.com
@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger
33. Why did elite western newspapers, media networks, and public health leaders so diligently repeat the absurd line that China had eliminated Covid by shutting down one city for two months? 35/ https://michaelpsenger.substack.com/p/chinese-protest-the-same-lockdowns
Chinese Protest the Same Lockdowns that Elites Advocated Here
If we’d taken health officials and media elites seriously, the entire free world would look like China does today.
michaelpsenger.substack.com
@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger
34. Why did elite western publications begin explicitly urging the public to adopt a response to COVID that was more like China’s? 36/ https://michaelpsenger.substack.com/p/the-gall-of-lockdowners-supporting
The Gall of Lockdowners Supporting China’s Anti-Lockdown Protests
If the intent was to get western elites to simultaneously support totalitarianism in their own countries while pretending to oppose it in China, then Xi Jinping has certainly made his point.
michaelpsenger.substack.com
@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger
35. Why were mechanical drones initially deployed by various states and countries to monitor lockdown compliance? 37/ https://www.nationalreview.com/news/chinese-company-suspected-of-spying-on-u-s-citizens-donates-police-drones-to-22-states/
Chinese Company Suspected of Spying on U.S. Citizens Donates Police Drones to 22 States | National Review
Police in Elizabeth, N.J., for example, are using the drones to surveil residents in places where patrol cars can't easily reach, such as spaces between buildings.
nationalreview.com
@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger
36. Why did masks shift from being not advised to being mandatory? 38/ https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-51729647
Coronavirus: Face mask ads banned for 'misleading' claims
Adverts by two firms made false claims about preventing the spread of coronavirus, watchdog rules.
bbc.com
@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger
37. The New York Times confirmed that at the standard cycle threshold level used for PCR testing, 85 to 90% of Covid cases were false positives. How did this practice become standard? 39/ https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/29/health/coronavirus-testing.html
Your Coronavirus Test Is Positive. Maybe It Shouldn’t Be. (Published 2020)
The usual diagnostic tests may simply be too sensitive and too slow to contain the spread of the virus.
nytimes.com
@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger
38. Why were widely-known and publicized problems with PCR testing and comorbidities ignored for purposes of counting COVID deaths? 40/ https://www.ukcolumn.org/article/deceptive-construction-why-we-must-question-covid-19-mortality-statistics
A Deceptive Construction - Why We Must Question The COVID 19 Mortality Statistics
How many people have actually died of Covid-19, compared to the governent's claimed headline figure.
ukcolumn.org
@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger
39. Why did key public health officials so quickly shift from saying vaccines would prevent Covid to saying proof of vaccination should be mandatory to partake in everyday activities? 41/
Video Transcript AI Summary
There has been a significant return on investment, but it's not as high as claimed. Vaccinated individuals are protected against COVID-19 and its variants, reducing transmission and allowing society to return to normal. Getting both vaccine shots is crucial. Vaccinated people are unlikely to get infected, be hospitalized, or die from the virus. They can participate in activities without masks or distancing, but they can still transmit the virus. Vaccines slightly reduce transmission, but a new approach is needed. Israel's experience suggests a potential need for booster shots. The plan is for every adult to receive a booster shot. Overall, it has been a great investment.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There's been over a 20 to 1 return.
Speaker 1: If you had put that money into an S and P 500 and reinvested the dividends, you'd come up with something like $17,000,000,000, but you think it's $200,000,000,000? Here, yeah.
Speaker 2: You're okay. You're not gonna you're not gonna get COVID if you have these vaccinations.
Speaker 3: These vaccines are Highly, highly effective.
Speaker 1: Vaccinated people do not carry the virus. Don't get sick.
Speaker 3: They're really, really good against variants.
Speaker 0: Everyone who takes the vaccine is not just protecting themselves, but reducing their transmission, to other people and allowing society to get back To normal.
Speaker 1: Get your 1st shot, and when you're due for your 2nd, get your 2nd shot.
Speaker 0: Our key goal is to stop the transmission, to get the immunity levels up so that you get almost no almost no, infection going on whatsoever.
Speaker 3: When people are vaccinated, they can feel safe that they are not going to get infected.
Speaker 2: If you're vaccinated, You're not gonna be hospitalized. You're not gonna be in ICU unit, and you're not gonna die. If you are fully vaccinated, You no longer need to wear a mask.
Speaker 1: Anyone who is fully vaccinated can participate in indoor and outdoor activities, Large or small, without wearing a mask or physical distancing. But what they can't do anymore is prevent transmission.
Speaker 0: You know, we didn't have vaccines that block transmission. We got vaccines to help you with your health, but they only slightly reduce transmissions. We need a new New way of doing the vaccine.
Speaker 4: The level of virus in the nasopharynx of a person who's vaccinated and infected is the same level As the level of virus in the nasal variance of an unvaccinated person.
Speaker 1: Reports from our international colleagues, Including Israel suggests increased risk of severe disease amongst those vaccinated early.
Speaker 4: And if you look at Israel Mhmm. Which There's always been a month to a month and a half ahead of us. They are seeing a waning actually be an essential part of the primary regimen that people should have.
Speaker 2: Plan is for every every adult to get a booster shot.
Speaker 0: Dollars? Clearly one of the best investments, I've ever been involved in.
@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger
40. Why has there been so little public discussion of China’s influence on the global response to COVID, despite the FBI Director’s disclosure that Chinese officials were “aggressively urging support for China’s handling of the COVID-19 crisis?” 42/
Video Transcript AI Summary
Chinese diplomats are actively seeking support for China's handling of the COVID-19 crisis, according to federal, state, and local officials. This influence is occurring at both the federal and state levels, with a recent incident involving a state senator being asked to introduce a resolution in support of China's response to the pandemic. Unfortunately, the pandemic has not halted these efforts.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And I will note that the pandemic has unfortunately not stopped any of this. In fact, we've heard from federal, state, and even local officials that Chinese diplomats are aggressively urging support for China's handling of the COVID-nineteen crisis. Yes, this is happening at both the federal and state levels. Not that long ago, we had a state senator who was recently even asked to introduce a resolution supporting China's response to the pandemic.
@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger
41. Why were governments across the western world so deferential to Neil Ferguson and Imperial College during the response to COVID, despite Imperial having the closest relationship with China of any western university? 43/ https://www.imperial.ac.uk/news/168497/chinese-president-sees-uk-china-academic-partnerships/
Chinese President sees UK-China academic partnerships at Imperial | Imperial News | Imperial College London
XI JINPING'S STATE VISIT - President Xi Jinping of the People's Republic of China visited Imperial College London today (21 October).
imperial.ac.uk
@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger
42. Why has the editor-in-chief of the Lancet been so publicly deferential to China? 44/ https://www.globaltimes.cn/content/1187265.shtml
China shows world the right way for pandemic response: The Lancet chief editor - Global Times
globaltimes.cn
@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger
43/ Why did Bill Gates express such admiration for China’s response to Covid? 45/
Video Transcript AI Summary
China effectively suppressed the virus through authoritarian measures, violating individual rights but achieving impressive results. Their ability to quickly build hospitals and enforce mask-wearing kept virus numbers low. This strict lockdown approach set a new tone for other countries' responses, deviating from the traditional epidemiological playbook. Even Sweden, often cited for its different approach, still implemented behavioral changes. As for the US, despite being the world's largest economy and having top epidemiologists, its response has been poor. The speaker attributes this to a belief in freedom, implying a reluctance to implement strict measures.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In their typical, fairly authoritarian way, they did a very good job of suppressing the virus. You know, there may have been a lot of individual rights that were violated there, but the overall macro effect that they achieved, is, you know, quite, kind of amazing, they had the benefit that it was really Hubei, you know, 60,000,000 people and they brought in the health resources, 1,400,000,000 and their ability to build hospitals, very, very quickly and force compliance with masks and various other things, but they've kept the virus numbers to very low levels, compared to most countries.
Speaker 1: Do you think the fact that China went into this very strict lockdown very quickly set the tone for the way other countries responded? Because that was not really part of the epidemiological playbook, before.
Speaker 0: No, you're absolutely right. I, you know, I live in infectious diseases and how you stop them. And so when we were first talking about the shutdown, I was like, wow, we're really gonna do this. Are people really willing to do this? How much productivity are we gonna lose by doing this.
So that day we sat there in early March and said, okay, no one comes to the foundation offices and they haven't been since, you know, we were talking with Microsoft about it, and they did the same thing. I remember thinking, gosh, I wish we practice for this because it's such a novel idea. And so I think, yes, that influence things. The idea that you would just let it rip, and nobody really did that. Even Sweden that people call out did ask for behavioral change.
They didn't do pure bans quite as much and during the epidemic there have been periods where it looked like their approach was smart, then it looked like it wasn't smart, you know, that still swivels around to this day about the relative health and economic effects that they experienced versus other countries.
Speaker 1: Now let's turn to the US because it's the country, you know, it's the world's biggest economy. It's the preeminent public health Country in the world has got the world's best epidemiologist. I mean, why is it done so badly?
Speaker 0: Well, we believe in freedom.
@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger
44/ How did a 40-year member of the British Communist Party with no background in epidemiology become a leading advisor to the UK Government on COVID, and why was she recently promoted to lead the WHO’s nudge unit? 46/ https://michaelpsenger.substack.com/p/uk-sages-susan-michie-promoted-to
UK SAGE’s Susan Michie Promoted to Lead WHO’s Nudge Unit
Susan Michie, a 40-year member of the British Communist Party and a leading participant in the UK Government’s Scientific Pandemic Insights group on Behaviour (SPI-B) “nudge unit” to drive consent for Covid mandates, has been promoted to Chair of the WHO’s Technical Advisory Group for Behavioural Insights and Science for Health.
michaelpsenger.substack.com
@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger
45. Why did economists at leading universities assume that a short, sharp lockdown would “eliminate the resurgence risk” when the policy had no precedent? 47/ https://www.igmchicago.org/surveys/policy-for-the-covid-19-crisis/
Policy for the COVID-19 Crisis - Clark Center Forum
This week’s IGM Economic Experts Panel statements: A) A comprehensive policy response to the coronavirus will involve tolerating a very large contraction in economic activity until the spread of infections has dropped significantly. B) Abandoning severe lockdowns at a time when the likelihood of a resurgence in infections remains high will lead to greater total […]
kentclarkcenter.org
@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger
46. Why did politicians and public health officials demonstrate so little concern for following their own COVID rules? 48/
@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger
47. If COVID was actually deadly enough to kill millions and justify an indefinite state of emergency, why has so little effort been expended to hold China accountable for its initial coverup of that virus? 49/ https://michaelpsenger.substack.com/p/the-china-situation-isnt-as-bad-as
The China Situation Isn’t As Bad As It Looks. It’s Far Worse.
The International Criminal Conspiracy of “Change Through Trade”
michaelpsenger.substack.com
@MichaelPSenger - Michael P Senger
Though many in positions of power would prefer we forgot, the strict lockdowns that consumed the world in 2020 are extremely well documented. Until we have real answers as to how exactly they happened, and why, we won’t be living in a real democracy. /end https://michaelpsenger.substack.com/p/nuremberg-ii-what-a-real-inquiry
Nuremberg II: What a Real Inquiry into the Response to Covid Would Look Like
Disturbing questions remain as to who did what, when, and why in the days leading up to the lockdowns of spring 2020 and beyond.
michaelpsenger.substack.com
reSee.it AI Summary
The real pandemic is not COVID-19, but rather a multitude of societal issues. Left-leaning educational institutions indoctrinate young people, while biased mainstream media perpetuates misinformation and division. Political correctness and cancel culture stifle open discourse, and open borders undermine national sovereignty. The relentless expansion of government power encroaches on individual liberties, and victimhood mentality spreads throughout society. End-of-pipe solutions are favored over addressing root causes, and identity politics divides society. The blind trust in figures like Bill Gates replaces expert opinion with celebrity influence. Personal liberties are lost in the name of safety and security, setting dangerous precedents for future crises. Fear is manipulated to create a culture of compliance, and processed food is normalized over a healthy diet. Obesity is promoted as normal, and gender reassignment is casually accepted. Women seek validation through social media, and experimental gene therapies pose potential risks. Reading and attention spans decline due to social media, resulting in a less informed and easily manipulated public.
@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek
🧵THREAD: What if I told you the real pandemic isn't Covid?
@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek
#2 The real pandemic is the indoctrination of young people through left-leaning educational institutions. FACT: All of the top 25 universities in the country were mandating that their students be vaccinated (https://bit.ly/3Mc1RQC).
In A Divided America, Every One Of Nation’s Top 25 Universities Now Requiring Students To Be Vaccinated
With the new academic year beginning soon, all of the institutions ranked among the top 25 in the nation by U.S. News & World Report are requiring their students to be vaccinated. But many public universities remain reluctant to go that route.
forbes.com
@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek
#3 The real pandemic is the mainstream media's biased reporting, which perpetuates misinformation and division. FACT: Mainstream media was actively discriminating against the unvaccinated and pushing the narrative. Critical journalists got dismissed.
@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek
#4 The real pandemic is the assault on free speech, as political correctness and cancel culture stifle open discourse. FACT: Those who do not comply with political correctness are canceled and socially excluded. (https://bit.ly/3NTyJPe)
Misgendering Is a Human Rights Violation, Canadian Court Rules
A human rights tribunal ruled that pronouns are “a fundamental part of a person’s identity.”
them.us
@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek
#5 The real pandemic is the push for open borders and mass immigration, which undermines national sovereignty and identity. FACT: About 2.7 million people illegally crossed the Southern border in 2022 (https://nbcnews.to/3nT57XE).
Migrant border crossings in fiscal year 2022 topped 2.76 million, breaking previous record
The number of undocumented immigrant crossings at the southern border in fiscal 2022 topped 2.76 million, breaking the previous annual record by 1 million.
nbcnews.com
@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek
#6 The real pandemic is the relentless expansion of government power, which encroaches on individual liberties. FACT: The plandemic was used as a catalyst for mass surveillance laws (https://bit.ly/3HV4vaK).
The COVID-19 pandemic: Yet another catalyst for governmental mass surveillance?
This commentary addresses the use of surveillance technologies in the context of the Covid-19 pandemic, using examples from the current geopolitical f…
sciencedirect.com
@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek
#7 The real pandemic is the devaluation of personal responsibility, as victimhood mentality spreads throughout society. FACT: The younger generation is being offended by literally everything, which includes that someone didn't ask for their pronouns.
@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek
#8 The real pandemic is the use of end-of-pipe solutions instead of addressing the root cause of a problem. FACT: Early treatments would have saved millions of lives, but instead Ivermectin and Vitamin D are still demonized.
@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek
#9 The real pandemic is the promotion of identity politics, which divides society and undermines national unity. FACT: Spot the trans woman. If you claim you can, you are a transphobic bigot, because they blend in with society just like you and me.
@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek
#10 The real pandemic is the push for globalism, which threatens national sovereignty and dilutes unique cultural identities. FACT: The WEF boasts of controlling most politicians in Western countries. None of us has elected the WEF.
@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek
#11 The real pandemic is the blind trust in figures like Bill Gates, where expert opinion is replaced by celebrity influence. FACT: Bill Gates is anything but an expert in health matters, but has repeatedly been portrayed as one by the media.
@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek
#12 The real pandemic is the infringement on Second Amendment rights, leaving law-abiding citizens vulnerable. FACT: These well-known world leaders who took guns away from their citizens. It didn't end well.
@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek
#13 The real pandemic is the radical climate agenda, which hampers economic growth and job opportunities. FACT: The IPCC data is very questionable and has been 'adjusted' multiple times in the past (see: climategate). Additionally, the media reports very selectively.
@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek
#14 The real pandemic is the promotion of critical race theory, which perpetuates racial division and resentment. FACT: This is mainly fueled by the media, as shown by @KanekoaTheGreat in his thread.
@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat
#1 Look at the increase of news articles mentioning "white privilege," "systemic racism," "diversity and inclusion," and "unconscious bias." How does the media's focus on identity politics and critical race theory contribute to the division and polarization of society?
@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek
#15 The real pandemic is the suppression of critical voices on social media platforms, hindering free thought and debate. FACT: Thousands of us have been banned from social media for something that is now considered "mainstream". And it will happen again.
@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek
#16 The real pandemic is men watching porn and women taking birth control. FACT: The excessive consumption of porn has been shown to reduce sexual desire in both men and women (https://bit.ly/41l84hx). The resulting decline in population is a cause for concern. https://bit.ly/41l84hx).
Is Internet Pornography Causing Sexual Dysfunctions? A Review with Clinical Reports
Traditional factors that once explained men’s sexual difficulties appear insufficient to account for the sharp rise in erectile dysfunction, delayed ejaculation, decreased sexual satisfaction, and diminished libido during partnered sex in men under 40. This review (1) considers data from multiple domains, e.g., clinical, biological (addiction/urology), psychological (sexual conditioning), sociological; and (2) presents a series of clinical reports, all with the aim of proposing a possible direction for future research of this phenomenon. Alterations to the brain's motivational system are explored as a possible etiology underlying pornography-related sexual dysfunctions. This review also considers evidence that Internet pornography’s unique properties (limitless novelty, potential for easy escalation to more extreme material, video format, etc.) may be potent enough to condition sexual arousal to aspects of Internet pornography use that do not readily transition to real-life partners, such that sex with desired partners may not register as meeting expectations and arousal declines. Clinical reports suggest that terminating Internet pornography use is sometimes sufficient to reverse negative effects, underscoring the need for extensive investigation using methodologies that have subjects remove the variable of Internet pornography use. In the interim, a simple diagnostic protocol for assessing patients with porn-induced sexual dysfunction is put forth.
mdpi.com
@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek
#17 The real pandemic is the marginalization of climate change skeptics, stifling balanced debate and comprehensive understanding of the issue. FACT: Climate models are considered 'scientific consensus'. Those who are questioning the narrative are labeled as 'climate deniers'.
Video Transcript AI Summary
As an engineer and business manager, I have never found any logical scientific evidence to worry about atmospheric gases. When hydrocarbon fuels are burned, they produce carbon dioxide and water vapor. Carbon dioxide is essential for life. Two natural experiments in 2009 and 2020 showed that despite reductions in human carbon dioxide emissions, the levels in the atmosphere continued to increase. This proves that humans do not have a significant impact on carbon dioxide levels, as it is controlled by nature.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: As an engineer educated in atmospheric gases and as a business manager, I was responsible for hundreds of people's lives based on my knowledge of atmospheric gases. I listen to scientists. I cross examine scientists and I debate the science. I have never found anyone Logical scientific points based on empirical scientific evidence that shows we have anything to worry about at all. And the basics of this, When you burn a hydrocarbon fuel, you burn molecules containing carbon and hydrogen with oxygen, they form C O 2 carbon dioxide and h two o water vapor.
That's it. Carbon dioxide is essential for all life, but let's go beyond the science and have a look at natural experiment. We have had two Natural experiments, global experiments in the last 14 years. The first was in 2009 when the use of hydrocarbon fuels in the recession that followed the global financial crisis Reduced. There was less carbon dioxide produced from from human use of hydrocarbons.
And what did that what happened to the level of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere? It kept increasing. And what happened in 2020, when we had a major recession, almost a depression around the world as a result of COVID restrictions placed by governments. We saw the same reduction in hydrocarbon fuel used by humans, the same cutting carbon dioxide output from humans, and yet carbon dioxide in the atmosphere continued increasing. And those who understand the science understand that it is fundamental.
Humans cannot and do not affect the level of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. It's controlled by nature entirely.
@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek
#18 The real pandemic is the loss of personal liberties in the name of safety & security, setting dangerous precedents for future crises. FACT: Vax certificates were only the beginning. Digital currencies and social & carbon credit systems will follow (https://on.wsj.com/3HX4dQR). https://on.wsj.com/3HX4dQR).
Central-Bank Digital Currencies Are Coming—Whether Countries Are Ready or Not
The game-changing development could have a profound impact on the banking system. But few people still understand it.
wsj.com
@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek
#19 The real pandemic is the manipulation of fear, creating a culture of compliance and discouraging dissent and independent thought. FACT: Spreading fear & panic during the 'pandemic' was most likely the main driver for excess death. We've been warned (https://bit.ly/42jvJjO). https://bit.ly/42jvJjO).
Fear and panic can do more harm than the coronavirus, says PM Lee Hsien Loong
He noted that Singapore is much better prepared to deal with the new coronavirus because of its experience tackling Sars 17 years ago. Read more at straitstimes.com.
straitstimes.com
@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek
#20 The real pandemic is the normalization of processed food, as a healthy and balanced diet is disregarded in favor of convenience and artificial flavors. FACT: Hardly anyone of gen Z knows how to cook nutritious and healthy food. Graph: % of consumed processed food.
@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek
#21 The real pandemic is the promotion of obesity as 'normal,' overshadowing the serious health risks associated with excessive weight and unhealthy lifestyle choices. FACT: Being obese is a choice and not healthy. Those who state this are usually being accused of 'fat-shaming'.
@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek
#22 The real pandemic is the casual acceptance of gender reassignment, undermining the biological realities and potential psychological implications of such profound changes. FACT: Women are women, men are men. Women can menstruate, men can't.
@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek
#23 The real pandemic is the growing trend of women seeking validation through likes on Instagram and OnlyFans, as self-worth becomes increasingly tied to online approval. FACT: There are beta-males paying for that.
@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek
#24 The real pandemic is the potential risks posed by experimental gene therapies, as the rush for solutions may overshadow comprehensive safety evaluations. FACT: We still do not know the long-term effects of these COVID vaccines. But the data does not look good.
@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek
#25 The real pandemic is the decline in reading and the shortened attention spans due to social media, resulting in a less informed and more easily manipulated public. FACT: More and more young people are no longer reading books. Instead, they are liking photos on Instagram.
@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek
#26 The real pandemic is the scarcity of authentic voices in a sea of online noise. Don't let this epidemic continue unchecked. Hit the follow button and join the resistance. 🔥
reSee.it AI Summary
House Homeland Security hearing on DHS's role in censorship industry. FFOFreedom coined "censorship laundering." Chairman Dan Bishop's impressive remarks. Ranking Member Ivey surprised by DHS censorship. Cynthia MillerIdriss's deceptive witness response. No defense of CISA's censorship. MillerIdriss brainwashing videos funded by NSF and DHS. Codebook of antivaccine rhetoric. MillerIdriss decides truth for citizens. DHS funding irony. Productive and civil hearing. Need more hearings to expose DHS's censorship. RepDanBishop's success in defending free speech.
@MikeBenzCyber - Mike Benz
🚨Censorship Hearing Superthread🚨 In this thread, I will be covering a critically important House Homeland Security hearing on the DHS’s role in the censorship industry. Analysis & live reactions below: https://www.youtube.com/live/HY_hMVRF5zo?feature=share
@MikeBenzCyber - Mike Benz
2. I note upfront a bit of personal pride: it was our foundation, @FFO_Freedom, that coined the phrase “censorship laundering” and has laid the groundwork for accountability that is happening today. For a full primer background, see here: https://foundationforfreedomonline.com/dhs-censorship-agency-had-strange-first-mission-banning-speech-that-casts-doubt-on-red-mirage-blue-shift-election-events/
DHS Censorship Agency Had Strange First Mission: Banning Speech That Casts Doubt On ‘Red Mirage, Blue Shift’ Election Events
The Department of Homeland Security’s (DHS) quiet coup to establish, for the first time in US history, an explicitly inward-facing domestic censorship bureau.
foundationforfreedomonline.com
@MikeBenzCyber - Mike Benz
3. Chairman Dan Bishop is absolutely killing it with his introductory remarks. Pitch perfect. He just put a video clip first discovered and published by @FFO_Freedom on the Congressional Jumbotron for all Americans to see. It shows DHS plot w/ EIP: https://rumble.com/v1nd5vy-eip-fill-the-gaps-in-govt-lacked-funding-and-legal-authorization-for-censor.html
EIP - "Fill The Gaps In Gov't" "Lacked Funding & Legal Authorization" for Censorship
Archive
rumble.com
@MikeBenzCyber - Mike Benz
4. I am typically very picky & perfectionist about public presentation of this scandal, but Chairman Dan Bishop laid out the case in beautiful detail & framed case perfectly. Hugely impressed w/ introductory remarks and depth of research @HomelandGOP has clearly put into this.
@MikeBenzCyber - Mike Benz
5. Ranking Member Ivey for the democrats seems surprised & is apparently learning about DHS censorship activities for the first time. He said censorship issues are “tangential” to oversight of DHS. That uses to be true. But DHS became a censorship factory. So now here are.
@MikeBenzCyber - Mike Benz
6. Here is Chairman Bishop’s beautiful summary encapsulation of DHS’s role in the laundering of domestic censorship:
Video Transcript AI Summary
This hearing examines the Department of Homeland Security's role in censoring American voices through supposedly independent organizations. While protecting election infrastructure from foreign disinformation was the initial goal, it expanded to include countering domestic misinformation. The government created NGOs, like the Election Integrity Project, to do what it couldn't do directly. CISA acted as a switchboard to flag and notify social media platforms of misinformation, resulting in millions of tweets categorized as such. The same tools were used to censor COVID-19 narratives, some of which were later proven true. Concerns arise about DHS overreaching its jurisdiction and expanding censorship to various topics. The hearing questions the failure of leadership within DHS and the potential threat to civil liberties.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Security's role in the censorship laundering enterprise and the legal and constitutional implications of the department's role in censoring American voices. I now recognize myself for an opening statement. Good afternoon. Welcome to the subcommittee on Oversight, Investigations and Accountabilities hearing titled Censorship laundering, how the US Department of Homeland Security enables the silencing of dissent. Today's hearing will examine the Department of Homeland security's role as the nerve center of the government scheme to censor the online voices of millions of Americans, laundering its efforts through a veil of ostensibly independent nongovernmental organizations.
Freedom of speech and open debate are essential features of a free society. Efforts to censor public discourse under the guise of countering misinformation, disinformation, and malinformation threaten this fundamental right. To clarify, no one would argue or is arguing that hacking voting machines or posting incorrect voting locations to prevent people from voting would ever be acceptable. This committee recognizes that CISA has a monumental task and supports CISA's critical mission to secure our federal networks in critical infrastructure. But as our witnesses today will attest, CISA has deviated from this core mission and risks losing the trust of Congress, the American people and its vital private sector partners.
What was initially a limited effort to counter foreign disinformation on elections metastasized into a sprawling effort that directly or indirectly censors Americans discourse and debate that are the hallmark of our democracy. In 2018, the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, CISA, was charged with protecting election infrastructure, which CISA decided unilaterally included countering election misinformation from foreign malign actors. By the 2020 elections, mission creep found CISA pivoting away from foreign sources to focus on domestic, quote, misinformation. But the government knew this would raise huge constitutional concerns, so It helped create nongovernmental entities such as the Election Integrity Project to do for the government what the government could not do on its own. And they knew it.
Listen to the head of the
Speaker 1: This is not because CISA didn't care about disinformation. But at the time, They lacked, both kind of the funding and the legal authorizations to go do the kinds of work that would be necessary to truly understand how election disinformation was operating. So because of the feedback and the ideas from this group, we were able to pull together pretty quickly A project between these 4 different institutions to try to fill the gap of the things that the government cannot do themselves.
Speaker 0: So government supported and funded NGOs to try to fill the gap of the things the government could not do themselves. That is just incredible. In a matter of a few months, CISA helped set up this censorship infrastructure. CISA acted as a switchboard, to use their words, to flag what they called misinformation and notify social media platforms who could independently, they say, Decide whether to remove or modify the content. All told, according to 1 source, during the 2020 election this scheme resulted in 859,000,000 tweets collected for misinformation analysis, 22,000,000 tweets and retweets categorized as misinformation subject to censorship.
21 Twitter users, Americans, domestic sources identified and stigmatized as, quote, the most prominent repeat spreaders of disinformation, all of whom, Perhaps, coincidentally, we're on the political right. And it's not just for elections. The same network using the same tools censored dozens of purportedly false covid nineteen narratives, many of which have subsequently been acknowledged as being true. So where is this headed? What is stopping DHS from overreaching its jurisdiction again to censor more Americans on whatever it deems critical infrastructure.
In fact, who can say that it's not being done right now? We know DHS wants to expand this activity. Just last year, they tried and then retreated under ridicule, from creating a disinformation governance board. DHS documents suggest that CISA wants to target issues as wide ranging as racial justice, the US withdrawal from Afghanistan, the war in Ukraine, and financial markets. The current CISA director has given us a clue as to what the ultimate goal might be.
Listen to her.
Speaker 2: If you think about it, you know, our mission is critical infrastructure. The most important critical infrastructure excuse me, critical infrastructure there is, is our cognitive infrastructure. And so building that resilience is part of the mission set in my view.
Speaker 0: George Orwell called and he wants his dystopian future back. I'm gravely concerned with CISA's efforts in this space. How on earth Was this censorship laundering enterprise allowed to metastasize? Where are the civil liberties protectors within DHS and what are they doing. It is obvious that there has been an abject failure of leadership within DHS to allow this expanded role of this nature to occur.
This this scheme of censorship by proxy represents an attempt by the government to to accomplish indirectly and in secret what it would not have the power to do openly. It should give all Americans who care about civil liberties, who care about freedom of speech and association, great pause. I look forward to the testimony today. I thank you all for joining us. I now recognize the ranking member of the gentleman gentleman from Maryland, mister Ivey, for his opening statement.
@MikeBenzCyber - Mike Benz
7. This clip is a knockout punch. It’s no wonder the folks on the other side of the issue today have no rebuttal to it:
Video Transcript AI Summary
The government created nongovernmental entities like the Election Integrity Project to address constitutional concerns and perform tasks that the government couldn't do alone. The head of the project explains that the government lacked funding and legal authorizations to tackle election disinformation. However, with input from this group, a project was quickly formed involving four institutions to bridge this gap. In essence, the government supported and funded NGOs to fulfill tasks beyond their own capabilities.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The government knew this would raise huge constitutional concerns, so it helped create nongovernmental entities such as the Election Integrity Project to do for the government what the government could not do on its own. And they knew it. Listen to the head of the
Speaker 1: This is not because CISA didn't care about this information, but at the time, they lacked, both Kind of the funding and the legal authorizations, to go do the kinds of work that would be necessary to truly understand how election disinformation is operating. So because of the feedback and the ideas from this, this group, we were able to pull together pretty quickly A project between these 4 different institutions to try to fill the gap of the things that the government cannot do themselves.
Speaker 0: So government supported and funded NGOs to try to fill the gap of the things the government could not do themselves.
@MikeBenzCyber - Mike Benz
8. Stunning deception by Cynthia Miller-Idriss in her witness response. She tried to fool the committee that her digital literacy (censorship & brainwashing) work is not “teaching people what to think.” Here she is targeting vaccine skeptics with censorship & thought control:
@MikeBenzCyber - Mike Benz
9. We are 30 minutes in and no one from the democrats or the expert witness have even attempted to defend what CISA did to censor domestic speech. They know it’s indefensible, and aren’t even trying.
@MikeBenzCyber - Mike Benz
10. If Cynthia Miller-Idriss is not teaching people what to think, how does she explain her extensive work to stop people thinking about not taking vaccines, or from reading online news critical or vaccines? That is literally the science of brainwashing people what to think:
@MikeBenzCyber - Mike Benz
11. “Not telling people what to think” but she is government-funded by the NSF and the DHS and she is making literal brainwashing “attitudinal inoculation” videos — with government money — to stop people from resisting vaccines.
@MikeBenzCyber - Mike Benz
12. Cynthia Miller-Idriss even created a “codebook” of English-language “anti-vaccine rhetoric” —- mapping the slogans, hashtags, slang and words of ordinary Americans hesitant to take the Covid vaccine.
@MikeBenzCyber - Mike Benz
13. Cynthia Miller-Idriss is the very example of the government-funded whole-of-society censorship apparatus this hearing is supposed to be about. Her censorship work (that’s what “digital literacy” and “misinformation research” are) is funded by NSF and DHS —- YOUR tax dollars:
@MikeBenzCyber - Mike Benz
14. Cynthia Miller-Idriss apparently doesn’t think ordinary citizens are able to determine what’s true — good thing her career is deciding those truths for the unwashed masses: https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2022/10/31/politics/pelosi-attack-right-wing-conspiracy-theories-invs/index.html
Conservative figures push salacious theory about Pelosi attack as local police chief debunks it
Prominent figures on social media, including some of the loudest voices on the political right, are pushing a salacious and false conspiracy theory about the attack on House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's husband, in an apparent attempt to shift the narrative about the assault.
amp.cnn.com
@MikeBenzCyber - Mike Benz
15. Cynthia Miller-Idriss’s funding from DHS for violence prevention is ironic given that is the exact same DHS program office that we broke this week was targeting “Middle-Aged Pro Life Advocates” & “Old High School Friends” becoming “Budding Conspiracy Theorists”:
@MikeBenzCyber - Mike Benz
16. Hearing is concluding, looks like it was a short one. This was a highly productive 90 minutes, very civil in tone, and very pleasing to see no democrat on the committee voiced strong support for continuing the domestic censorship apparatus CISA set up.
@MikeBenzCyber - Mike Benz
17. I have much more to say on the topic. One thing is certain: we need 4-5 more of these hearings to crack open the depth of DHS’s censorship laundering. The American people deserve it. Huge success today by @RepDanBishop to make a forward thrust on our right to speak freely.
reSee.it AI Summary
In a Covid Retrospective Series, Vol 1 highlights the controversial view that unvaccinated individuals are scum. Vol 2 explores the belief that kids will thrive in facemasks. Vol 3 suggests reality is a conspiracy, while Vol 4 labels Dr. Fauci as a disinformation agent. Lastly, Vol 5 claims that rules are only for lab rats. These thought-provoking perspectives challenge conventional narratives.
@tomselliott - Tom Elliott
Covid Retrospective Series, Vol. 1 Media: The Unvaccinated Are Scum
Video Transcript AI Summary
When discussing the issue of vaccination, some speakers express frustration towards the unvaccinated. They believe that the unvaccinated are causing problems and should be blamed for the spread of COVID-19. They argue that the vaccinated should wear masks to protect the unvaccinated, but also feel that the unvaccinated are not behaving responsibly. Some suggest mandatory vaccination and consequences for those who choose not to get vaccinated. They criticize the unvaccinated for spreading misinformation and believe that their actions are leading to unnecessary deaths. Overall, there is a strong call for the unvaccinated to take responsibility and prioritize the well-being of society.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: When the chips are down, these, these civilized people they'll eat each other.
Speaker 1: You are the unvaccinated. You are the problem. It is the unvaccinated who are the problem period, end of story.
Speaker 2: The only people that you can blame, The only people you can blame this isn't shaming. This is the truth. Maybe they should be shamed by the unvaccinated. Just have to start Blaming the unvaccinated folks, not the regular folks. Anyone you came into contact with will blame you as will the rest of us Who've done the right thing by getting vaccinated.
Because frankly, we know that we can't trust the unvaccinated. I think it's time to get our moral house in order, Anderson. It's the unvaccinated who are the threat.
Speaker 1: All the vaccinated folks are gonna start wearing masks to protect the unvaccinated folks. It's called a Christian value.
Speaker 2: You're basically punishing the vaccinated for the the sins of the unvaccinated. Vaccinated. People are not behaving honorably. The unvaccinated are basically saying, well, it's open season for me. I can do whatever I want as well.
The the unvaccinated are basically Repeating their breasts running around the country saying, we don't care. We're living free and so forth.
Speaker 3: We've been patient, And our patience is wearing thin.
Speaker 2: The unvaccinated, a group that includes children and people acting like children. And the rest of us are starting to get pissed off. The vaccinated feel the unvaccinated are making me upset or angry.
Speaker 4: This is not about freedom A personal choice. Well, my freedom is being kind of disturbed here. No. Screw your freedom.
Speaker 2: The other day Howard Third wave in with a much different approach. Take a look. When are we gonna stop putting up with the idiots in this country and just say, you now it's mandatory to get vaccinated?
Speaker 5: Their freedom.
Speaker 2: But you're treading on our freedom and you're making other people sick, and really you're killing other people. The anti vaxxers, they seem to have a thing for death and home remedies. The anti maskers turned anti vaxxers are not just putting their own lives at risk. If that was a good issue, we could just say that We can watch them compete to win places show in the Darwin Awards. We have to start doing things for the greater good of society and not for idiots who think that they can do their own research.
And don't get me started on the lunatics who won't take any of the COVID vaccines.
Speaker 0: Life is too short to be an ass.
Speaker 2: Life is way too short to be ignorant of the promise of something that is helping people worldwide. If you're doing it because you're disconnected or disorganized. Maybe you have some sympathetic psychological reasons, but maybe you're just being antisocial. Oh, you can't shame them. You can't call them stupid.
You can't call them silly. Yes. They are.
Speaker 3: Those who are not vaccinated We'll end up paying the price.
Speaker 6: The unvaccinated should be taxed.
Speaker 7: They should pay more for healthcare.
Speaker 2: We need to start looking at the choice to remain vaccinated. The same as we look at driving while intoxicated. We're gonna see, and I've said almost 2 types of America. Doctor Fauci said that if hospitals get any more overcrowded, they're gonna have to make some very tough choices about who gets an ICU. It doesn't seem so tough to me.
Vaccinated person having a heart attack? Yes. Come right on in. We'll take care of you. Unvaccinated guy who gobbled horse goo?
Rest in peace, Wheezy.
Speaker 1: Pointing back to the unvaccinated who are really creating a problem in this country, every death that we are Thing from COVID could have been prevented.
Speaker 5: Literally, the only people dying are
Speaker 2: the unvaccinated. And for those of you spreading misinformation, shame on you. Shame on you. I don't know how some of you sleep at night.
@tomselliott - Tom Elliott
Online: https://news.grabien.com/story-covid-retrospective-vol-1-media-the-unvaccinated-are-scum IG: https://www.instagram.com/reel/CsJc-ZpOtjJ/?igshid=MzRlODBiNWFlZA== Youtube: https://youtu.be/tpuo4IYG0uA
[Covid Retrospective, Vol. 1] Media: The Unvaccinated Are Scum
‘You are unvaccinated, you are the problem’
news.grabien.com
Instagram
instagram.com
@tomselliott - Tom Elliott
If you like this video, you’ll enjoy following Grabien’s supercut wizard, @mazemoore
@tomselliott - Tom Elliott
@mazemoore Covid Retrospective Series, Vol. 2 Experts: Kids Are Going to Thrive in Facemasks!
Video Transcript AI Summary
From a public health standpoint, masks have a marginal effectiveness of around 10% at the population level. However, it is important for everyone, including children, to wear masks in schools. Kids are resilient and wearing masks can actually build their resilience. There is no evidence to suggest that masks have long-term psychological effects on young children. In fact, masking is considered safe and important, especially in schools. Children have no problem wearing masks and understand the need to deal with COVID scientifically. Wearing masks does not harm children and there is ongoing research showing that masks do not put them at risk. It is the responsibility of parents and leaders to set an example and ensure that children wear masks for their own protection.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: A really striking comment that you made in this interview, you said from a broad public health standpoint, and I'm quoting you now, at the population level, masks work at the margins maybe 10%.
Speaker 1: In the schools, everybody should wear a mask. It's asking kids to wear a mask is uncomfortable, but you know kids are pretty resilient.
Speaker 0: Kids are resilient. And if anything, this is going to build resilience in our holder.
Speaker 2: Where does have long term psychological effects on young kids, do you think? I don't think so. I think, in fact, it's good.
Speaker 1: Masking, is very important, particularly in the schools. Masks are safe. Masks do work.
Speaker 2: I have a 9 year old. He tolerates masks for everything. I don't hear him whine just like I don't hear him whine about his seat belt or his bike helmet. Children have no problem with what is going on. They want to deal sensibly by way of the science with COVID.
They've Said we have no difficulty with students wearing masks. When I look at the history of the world and when I think of, like, my parents and grandparents growing up in depressions, fighting wars, kids always had a part to play too. And when I look at the fact that they're just wearing a mask, but they have a roof over their head, they have food.
Speaker 1: A mask is basically not inclusive completely. I've yet to see a child whose mask was bothering him or her. In fact, in the emergency department, the kids are the best ones at wearing masks, and they often help their parents put masks on correctly. There's nothing Adverse or bad about mask. We've used mask for decades.
We mask kids and our cancer wards routinely.
Speaker 2: We have now a plethora of ongoing research and studies, and documents that are showing us that masks do not put children at risk.
Speaker 3: This concept that children somehow are harmed or abused by wearing masks is not founded in any science. It's Simple.
Speaker 1: It does no harm. My kids wear them to school.
Speaker 2: The idea that children won't wear masks is actually an application of leadership to say that we can't them and won't set an example for them.
Speaker 1: Those 50,000,000 children need to protect themselves by wearing masks.
Speaker 4: If I'm going to get on an airplane, I don't have to wear a mask, but I will have my kids wear 1.
Speaker 2: I don't think this is politically dividing at all. I wear a mask. My kids wear masks. I don't understand why parents are not listening to the science, not teaching their children to wear a mask. My responsibility, if I am lucky enough to be the next governor of Georgia, is to look at the science, to follow the protocols, and to set the right example.
Speaker 1: I think
Speaker 3: we're even talking to the children. When we talk to
Speaker 2: Schools and classrooms of children, they are happy to wear masks. Be comforted by the fact that children have so much neuroplasticity that it this is a bump in their social development, but that they can repair very easily. You don't go don't make it. Yeah. And right now, you shouldn't be going to school without a
Speaker 5: act. You're not likely to be able to be exposed to something and spread it to mommy or daddy. And it's not likely mommy and daddy are able to spread it to you either. So I wouldn't worry about it, baby. I promise you.
That's why we need to make sure children are wearing masks in school.
@tomselliott - Tom Elliott
Online: https://news.grabien.com/story-covid-retrospective-vol-2-experts-kids-are-going-to-thrive-in-facemask IG: https://www.instagram.com/reel/CsbmPzksdCf/?igshid=NzJjY2FjNWJiZg== YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jt_fjGM0MWE
[Covid Retrospective, Vol. 2] Experts: Kids Are Going to Thrive in Facemasks!
news.grabien.com
Instagram
instagram.com
@tomselliott - Tom Elliott
Covid Retrospective Series, Vol. 3 Reality Is a Conspiracy
@tomselliott - Tom Elliott
Covid Retrospective Series, Vol. 4 Dr. Fauci, Disinformation Agent
@tomselliott - Tom Elliott
Covid Retrospective Series, Vol. 5 Rules are for the lab rats!
@tomselliott - Tom Elliott
Covid Retrospective Series, Vol. 4 Anthony Fauci, America's Covid Disinformation Agent https://t.co/ufbdGBpG25
Video Transcript AI Summary
Critics question the effectiveness of masks and the handling of the pandemic. Dr. Fauci defends his decisions and denies funding gain-of-function research. The origins of COVID-19 are debated, with conflicting reports on a lab leak. Mental health concerns for children due to school closures are raised. Dr. Fauci clashes with Senator Paul over gain-of-function research. The debate continues on the virus's origins and research funding.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But they're really criticizing science because I represent science. If you're vaccinated, you really don't need to worry about getting it in a way that's serious or transmitting. That is true. That is correct, Chris. It'll need to protect you completely against infection, and the chances are very likely that you'll not be able to transmit it to other people.
The risk is extremely low of transmitting it to anybody else. Full stock vaccinated people are clearly capable of transmitting the infection. When you're in the middle of an outbreak, wearing a mask might make people feel a little bit better. If people are not wearing masks, then maybe we should be mandating it. I often myself wear 2 masks.
Speaker 1: And I'm quoting you now. At the population level, masks work at the margins maybe 10%. To hear that they only work at the margins maybe 10% would make a lot of people ask, okay, then why was I wearing a mask?
Speaker 0: You're really attacking not only doctor Anthony Fauci, you're attacking science when you say that this is gonna go away tomorrow like magic when you know that there's no chance it's gonna just disappear. We hope this just goes away, burns itself out.
Speaker 1: So my question is why weren't you straight with the American people about this to begin with?
Speaker 0: So the bottom line is it's a guesstimate. I gave a range.
Speaker 1: It seemed in that quote to suggest that you were basing your, your recommendation on polling and what people could accept. Is that not what you meant?
Speaker 0: No. I mean, it's it's a bit of that.
Speaker 1: We're seeing all of these school closures around the country. Is that the right move for children and families?
Speaker 2: Yeah. No.
Speaker 0: And I think what's going on right now is is generally an appropriate approach. You wanna start doing something to socially distance yourself. How dramatic that is, closing schools and doing other things should be proportionate. It went too far that particularly for kids, who who couldn't go to school except remotely, that it's forever damaged. Well, I don't think it's forever irreparably damaged anyone.
Speaker 3: The US surgeon general has called it an urgent public health crisis, a decline in the mental health of kids across the country. According to the CDC, the rates of suicide, self harm, anxiety, and depression are up among adolescents.
Speaker 0: And the record will show, Neil, that we didn't recommend shutting everything down. First of all, I didn't recommend locking anything down. I recommended to the president that we shut the country down, and that was very difficult decision because I knew it would have serious economic consequences, which it did. Yeah. Because if you look at the people that are politicizing me, they're somebody that all the way over on one level.
But there are a lot of other people who look upon me the way they should as a nonpolitical person that I am. They're not doing it because they say they don't wanna do it. They're Republicans. They don't like to be told what to do. Right.
And we gotta break that. But now is the time to do what you're told. Where did this virus come from, do you think, today? Did it come from a lab? Was it man made?
When you have the animal human interface and you have animals that come out of the wild that are sold at these open, what they call them, wet market.
Speaker 3: Place of origin was not within the market itself. No. I don't
Speaker 0: think you could say that.
Speaker 4: There's a report today that another intelligence arm of the US government, this is inside our energy department, has joined the FBI in concluding that COVID began with a lab leak in China.
Speaker 0: That the NIH has not ever and does not now fund gain of function research in the Wuhan Institute.
Speaker 2: We now know that a bat coronavirus was enhanced in the lab. The National Institutes of Health acknowledged that it funded research of a virus that was studied at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. The experiment unexpectedly, we're told, made a bat coronavirus more contagious than the original naturally occurring one.
Speaker 5: Take an animal virus and you increase the responsibility to humans. Right. You're saying that's not gain a phone?
Speaker 0: Yeah. That is correct. And and, senator Paul, you do not know what you are talking about, quite frankly, and I wanna say that officially. You do not know what you are talking about.
Speaker 5: They took animal viruses that only occur in animals, and they increased their transmissibility to humans. How you can say that is not gain of function?
Speaker 0: It is not. What we're talking about now is the gain of function research in studies that increase predominantly the transmissibility as well as pathogenesis and alteration of host range of the virus. But he's lying here, senator. It is you. I have to laugh at that.
I should be prosecuted.
reSee.it AI Summary
The lab origins of Covid are increasingly accepted, but the establishment is focusing blame on China to avoid scrutiny of US institutions. US government sources suggest the index cases worked at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, but information is being withheld. Legislation targeting the Wuhan Institute of Virology is being falsely claimed to declassify all information. Orchestrated efforts by the US and Chinese establishments are suspected, with limited declassification and cherry-picked information. The issue of whether the WIV is being framed or if there is a joint disinformation project is raised.
@samhusseini - Sam Husseini
My latest -- Covid Origins: Progress or Orchestrated Next-Stage Deceitful Narrative? Lab origins is now increasingly accepted, so now a major goal of the establishment is to focus blame on China so US institutions are not scrutinized and dangerous lab work continues....
@samhusseini - Sam Husseini
Michael Shellenberger, the lead writer on a story (with Matt Taibbi and Alex Gutentag) citing US government sources that the index cases of Covid worked at the Wuhan Institute of Virology asks ... the US government would withhold info about lab origins of Covid.
@samhusseini - Sam Husseini
...Hawley and others have completely falsified this legislation to the US public — he loudly claimed “my bill which will declassify all of the information the federal government has on Covid origins” when it clearly only targets the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
@samhusseini - Sam Husseini
So, the DNI, Avril Haines, will presumably put out something by that time. This all seems quite orchestrated... She and China's CDC Director George Gao discussed censoring a lab leak at Event 201 “table top” or “war games” in Oct. 2019:
@samhusseini - Sam Husseini
US Secretary of State Blinken is scheduled to be in China on Sunday and Monday. Haines and Blinken were both at WestExec. There is clearly a high level of orchestration going on. ...
@samhusseini - Sam Husseini
Much of the current narrative seems driven by a series of Muddy Waters reports overseen by Robert Kadlec... @_whitneywebb early on in the pandemic called him “Head of the Hydra”. He was Director for Biodefense [to] Bush. And in charge of “Warp Speed” under Donald Trump.
@samhusseini - Sam Husseini
Also at this time, @USRightToKnow has put out tiny bits of documents they finally got after years of struggle from the State Department...there’s ample reason to suspect that the US government is cherry picking information ... that casts itself in best possible light.
@samhusseini - Sam Husseini
The limitation of the declassification and the brazen falsification about it, have to raise the issue of whether with WIV is being framed. Or if there is some sort of joint disinformation project by the US and Chinese establishments.
reSee.it AI Summary
Mark Crispin Miller, a professor of Media Studies at New York University, discusses the manipulation of public opinion and the division within society. He highlights the corporate co-opting of movements like Black Lives Matter and the suppression of potential Covid treatments. Miller argues that this manipulation is causing further division and may ultimately harm democracy and science.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
2020: A PROPAGANDA MASTERPIECE PART TWO – DIVIDE & CONQUER A Conversation with Mark Crispin Miller, Professor of Media Studies at New York University. “The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society,” wrote Edward Bernays, the father of modern propaganda. From the corporate hijack of the Black Lives Matter movement, to the fraudulent suppression of life-saving Covid treatments, to the “coup” on January 6th, Miller makes the case that the establishment seeks to inflame a fractured country. Masked vs. unmasked, vaxxed vs. unvaxxed, Red vs. Blue: the ultimate losers of this pro-wrestling drama may be both democracy and science.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses how the COVID-19 pandemic has created a new category of forbidden speech, where questioning masks, vaccines, or the origins of the virus is seen as putting people at risk. They argue that it is important to hear both sides of the story and question the effectiveness of masks. They also discuss the George Floyd incident and the rise of movements like Black Lives Matter and Antifa, which they believe further divide the population. The speaker suggests that the pandemic and protests have been used to demolish independently owned businesses and introduce a woke militancy. They criticize the hypocrisy of wealthy individuals and corporations supporting these movements. The speaker also discusses the Trump presidency, conspiracy theories, and the Capitol riot, suggesting that the media's portrayal of these events is misleading.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: One of the things that the, COVID rollout has done is to create a whole new category of forbidden speech. Okay? That if you raise questions about masking, you raise questions about vaccines, You even question the origins of the pandemic. You raise any questions at all, you're putting people at risk. Okay?
If you're not completely credulous And if you don't soak up everything doctor Fauci says, then you're somehow putting people at risk. You want people to die.
Speaker 1: 99.5% of those Infections are people who haven't gotten vaccinated. I mean, come on. Anybody who disputes that sort of stuff is putting people's lives at risk and potentially killing
Speaker 0: So that's kind of a new, an emergency period, prescription on a whole huge category of speech. It's actually more urgent than ever before that we'd be allowed to hear the other side of the story. People should hear that masking does No good and is actually making you sicker, etcetera. Right? You can't listen to any of that.
If you bring that up, you're putting people at risk. Okay. Secondly, The George Floyd moment and the rise of BLM and along with it, Antifa, And on the other side, the Proud Boys, right? This is, first of all, exquisitely divisive, which is something that comes straight out of the imperial playbook. As it is, masking was a new way to divide the population So that maskers and anti maskers are on opposite sides.
Right? And that kind of matches the blue red, You know, split.
Speaker 2: I'm not afraid. The good lord takes care of me. If I die, I got we gotta get this country moving. Camden, what are you gonna do? Wear masks and stay inside for another year?
Speaker 0: Okay. I believe that the one of the primary purposes of the COVID rollout and the lockdowns was To, largely demolish, independently owned businesses, all over the country and the world. And it was very successful at doing that.
Speaker 3: The Wall Street Journal said 40% of black owned businesses were just gone, April of 2020.
Speaker 0: Then there was the George Floyd moment, You know, the George Floyd incident. After, you know, the infamous video of, Derek Chauvin with his knee on George Floyd's neck, there was an explosion of of protests, not just nationwide, but all over the world. And while there's no doubt that many of the people protesting were sincere, I think that, what we witnessed Here in the city and what people in other cities witnessed was a kind of controlled demolition of still more businesses. You and I each saw with our own eyes, the police actually standing down in the face of really violent vandalism, arson, things like that. We've seen these anomalous piles of bricks placed near, you know, where protests This
Speaker 2: is
Speaker 0: So we have this pattern Protests, you know, followed by a kind of mopping up that's extremely violent and destructive And that guts all these other stores and small businesses, right? So in a way, it's like a further body blow to the independent economy. And this introduces into the narrative a kind of woke militancy that has actually, I think, served to be part of the whole COVID narrative. When you've got Jamie Dimon and Mitt Romney and Jeff Bezos and Bill and Melinda Gates, right, And the Chase Manhattan Bank and Goldman Sachs and Amazon all saying black lives matter. You got Nancy Pelosi.
What is she worth, $120,000,000 taking a knee in the House of Representatives Lobby, you know, with the cloth on. I mean, seriously? These people are the biggest predators out there, and they're all telling us that black lives matter. I mean, this really does Getting the exercise. I mean, if you follow the the the stories of what it's like to be working in the Amazon warehouses under speed up conditions, right, Where these people are calling 911, you know, on a daily basis to report that yet another fellow worker has collapsed.
You got workers wearing diapers. Okay? Because they can't take bathroom breaks. Alright? A lot of those workers are black.
Don't their lives matter?
Speaker 4: If I had the opportunity to talk to Jeff Bezos face to face, I will really wanna ask him, have he ever worked in a warehouse before? Have he sweated for 10 to 12 hours a day and not being able to go to the restroom when He needed to go.
Speaker 5: And the issue of, of working conditions, I'm very proud of our working conditions.
Speaker 4: They got cameras. They watching us all the time.
Speaker 6: It's a lot of walking. It's a lot of fast pace. It's a lot of
Speaker 7: climbing upstairs. It's just a lot
Speaker 6: For the human body
Speaker 4: They're getting treated like robots, and and it's not fair because even robots break down sometimes.
Speaker 5: Command engine start. 2. I wanna thank every Amazon employee and every Amazon customer because you guys paid for all of this.
Speaker 8: Go, Jeff. Go, Mark. Go, Paul. Go, Oliver. You are going to space.
Speaker 0: I mean, is it enough for Bezos to say black Lives matter. Is it enough for him to put up a banner on, you know, Amazon Prime? BLM is a brand. Okay? It is a very, very lavishly funded brand.
You know, they'll paint the letters on a street in Washington. They got a $100,000,000 from the Ford Foundation, Right? They're getting that kind of funding. Right? Again, that's CIA money.
All right. So let's talk about the 3rd act in this grotesque Theatrical, right, starting in January 2020 and in a sense concluding on January 6 this year. Now, let me, preface this by noting that the equation of Donald Trump with Adolf Hitler actually began before the 2016 an election. There's a lot of people out there who actually think that those two historical figures are very similar, And that's based on knowing absolutely nothing about either Hitler or Trump, okay? Michiko Kakutani, the veteran book reviewer of the New York Times, was actually trotted out to do this big review of a new biography of Hitler, And the whole review was this elaborate comparison of Trump with Hitler, right, which tells me, The New York Times being as it is Intelligence connected, you know, tells me that this was a narrative that they wanted to have in people's minds, and it could even Relate to what I still regard as the surprise election of Donald Trump because it it fed the assumption that He had sort of taken over the country illegitimately.
I'm in no way a Trump, apologist or champion. I have no use for him at all. Right? I think that he and I were equally surprised by his victory. That's my own reading because, some Pretty compelling forensic evidence is out there that the 3 swing states, that he miraculously won late in the night, this is how it This goes down.
You know, there's a lot that's really wrong with those numbers. There's a lot that's suspicious about all that. And the fact that Team Trump didn't even have an acceptance speech written, because their own polling clearly told them that Hillary Clinton was gonna win, And that that was my reading of the polls.
Speaker 9: Sorry to keep you waiting. Complicated business. Complicated.
Speaker 3: You and I have a mild disagreement. I think that part of the The pro wrestling nature of Trump was to act surprised that he, you know, got the election. I mean, I think I think there's a a plan that unfolded for Trump to be president. I mean, I like to do this thought experiment. Let me throw it at you.
Imagine if Trump had been the one to say
Speaker 10: You must have a mask.
Speaker 3: You gotta close down your businesses. No school, no church, no small business economy. You know what? Everyone's gonna have to be taking a shot pretty soon, and and this is the way it is. People would have rightly said this is fascism.
But because Trump said it, I mean, he was so perfectly positioned earlier as, you know, this opponent of rationality or this, You know, this bigot or this, you know, this anti science persona, whether he got there by accident or not, he's definitely served a major purpose, Which was to weaponize the truth in a way against, people who might want to employ it.
Speaker 9: People think that goes away in April with the heat As the heat comes in, typically that will go away in April. We're in great shape there. The Democrats are politicizing The coronavirus. You know that. Coronavirus.
Speaker 2: And this is their new hoax.
Speaker 9: Healthy people, if you're healthy,
Speaker 11: You will probably,
Speaker 9: go through a process and and you'll be fine.
Speaker 12: President, is it safe or appropriate to be holding rallies during
Speaker 9: I think it's very safe. Yeah. I think it's very safe.
Speaker 1: The global death rate at 3.4%.
Speaker 9: Well, I think the 3.4% is really a false This number now, this is just my hunch. Personally, I would say the number is way under 1%. Everybody has to be calm. It's all going to work out. I mean, most people are getting better.
Most by far, the people are you get better with or without the vaccine. It's going to pass. Stop testing Right now, we have very few cases, if any. One thing that's for certain, don't let it dominate you. Don't be afraid of it.
Speaker 3: So, so this had tremendous consequences, but, of course, he was also the person who spearheaded, Operation Warp Speed, Which is giving us the dubious vaccine.
Speaker 9: Today, I wanna update you on the next stage of this momentous medical initiative. It's called Operation Warp Speed. That means big and it means fast. A massive scientific, industrial, and logistical endeavor unlike anything our country has seen since the Manhattan Project. You really could say that nobody's seen anything like we're doing, whether it's ventilators or testing.
Nobody's seen anything like we're doing now Within our country, since the 2nd World War
Speaker 0: Donald Trump has served as a a central Polarizing figure in a spectacle of politics that is Like nothing so much as a pro wrestling match. You know? I mean, Trump is the pro wrestling president. That's actually a fact in as much as he, you know, appointed Linda McMahon to head the Small Business Administration and he has himself Participated in, you know, pro wrestling SmackDowns.
Speaker 2: Indeed. Yes. The Donald is here live on He's still here. And, mister Trump, not coming along.
Speaker 0: There's something about the guy as a reality TV star that suggests He's playing a part. He's playing the part of of the swaggering, conceited, You know, wrestler who enjoys provoking the audience to ever wilder boos and cat calls, you know, and he He plays dirty tricks on the good guy, the opposition. And then that this reminds me of that moment in the debates with Hillary when he stood behind her looking like a Stalker. You
Speaker 13: know? So at some parts of watching last night, I was, like, I was really getting nervous because she was in a space. He's like a dog who's starting to get anxious. He's being backed in a corner. So I had a little anxiety during these moments.
Speaker 12: Fascinating. Let's talk about the handshake.
Speaker 0: He relishes that kind of provocation In a way that really does recall pro wrestling. And just as pro wrestling is fixed, You know, it's it's it's, it's a kind of orchestrated sports spectacle, that that Sticks to a script and uses certain special effects and so on, our politics is the same way.
Speaker 14: Clip, clip, clip, clip.
Speaker 2: At At WrestleMania, Donald Trump, I'm gonna do what everybody wanted to do.
Speaker 9: Well, you know, Vince, I don't know if you've seen the latest poll. I saw the other night John Travolta. He prefers Trump. I see others prefer Trump. The poll shows 95% of the Hollywood celebrities want your head shape, and we're gonna do it, Vince.
We're gonna do it.
Speaker 0: I don't think we can underestimate, the shock people felt when this orange buffoon became president, you know, with his cape, right, and his tights swaggering around the ring, you know, running up to the, his opponent When the referee's back was turned, you know, and hitting him, the kidney with his elbow, that kind of thing, they couldn't believe that he was president. Right? They never got over the shock of it.
Speaker 2: Donald Trump is In a world he is not familiar with. Come on, kid. Hey. Look at this. On a trip.
Traitor Traitor Traitor Traitor. Donald Traitor.
Speaker 14: And I
Speaker 0: think it does have some kind of psychopolitical dimension to it Because what it actually ended up doing, I mean, pretty quickly, was was, making the CIA and the FBI and The bureaucracy in Washington generally suddenly appear heroic, like our champions, you know. They're gonna protect us from from the bad orange man and his, his handler in the Kremlin. Right? This was combined With, this demonization of Putin
Speaker 1: The FBI, as part of our counterintelligence mission, is investigating the Russian government's efforts to interfere in the 2016 presidential election.
Speaker 15: Do you still believe the
Speaker 16: president could be a Russian asset?
Speaker 1: I think it's possible. I think that's why we started our investigation.
Speaker 16: It's very clear that the Russians interfered in the election, and it's Still puzzling as to why mister Trump does not acknowledge that and embrace it and also push back hard against mister Putin. The Russian threat To our democracy and our democratic foundations is real.
Speaker 17: This was the classic textbook Soviet and now Russian Tradecraft.
Speaker 11: The FBI doesn't do molds and campaigns, do they?
Speaker 18: No. It's a bunch of nonsense. The FBI's His mission is to protect the United States. So if they had tips that there might be a Russian infiltration into the United States to meddle with our election, which has been found out, then they should go after that. So using a confidential informant, a trusted source, to go test out those leads, It would be negligent for them not to do that.
Speaker 11: So that's a deep, deep state you got. By deep state, if you mean professionals who are consummate professionals My heroes who My heroes, the deep state. What continuity means, you understand what the constitution is.
Speaker 19: Right.
Speaker 11: If you don't care about party, if you don't care about politics Right. And just do what's right and and honor the law and honor Then god bless the deep state. But he's purging.
Speaker 5: Thank god for the deep state.
Speaker 16: I don't know what the principal protagonist in this drama is going to do, but I surely hope that those adults and those people In the White House and in the cabinet and in the congress are going to recognize that they need to act before there's a real disaster.
Speaker 1: To the truth. Yes. To the truth.
Speaker 0: You know, I mean, the whole thing has has actually jerked American Liberals back into the position Of the John Birch Society in the fifties or the far right because all of a sudden Russia is this this demonic force that that, you know, is is Directing all the far right movements in Europe and elsewhere. Also, the demonization of Trump has entailed a Ferocious hatred of the American working class.
Speaker 13: You could put half of Trump supporters into what I call the basket of deplorables.
Speaker 2: You might have some support from this audience, but 95% of them are idiots.
Speaker 9: To me, they look like a very smart group of people.
Speaker 0: As you've said, All kinds of extremely acute people who have understood and who have grasped the the the falseness of Narrative after narrative, right, until now have have succumbed to this.
Speaker 20: Even after we produce A vaccine. Experts say that it could be months or even years before we come back to anything Approaching normal.
Speaker 10: About between 750 a 1000 people today are dying. When he was presented with that number, he said it is what it is. Well, it is what it is because you are who you are. That's why it is.
Speaker 0: What's happened is, we've had this president Who would say certain things that have really serious real world consequences. He would say, for example, that hydroxychloroquine works, right? If you take it early enough, it will help you get over COVID-nineteen. He said this. So all of his followers believe it because he said it.
Okay? They don't believe it because it's true or they have any way of verifying it. They just believe it because he said it. Alternatively, everybody on the other side of the of the aisle, all the liberals, think it can't be true because he said it. That's just it.
He said it can't be true. Trump lies. I've heard that so many times. It's it's it's as if they've been subjected to some kind of, you know, communist brainwashing. Right?
He said that it can't be true. Well, as a matter of fact, he was right. And the suppression of hydroxychloroquine, The proscription on its use by governors interfering with doctors trying to treat their patients. I mean, this is this is a crime against humanity.
Speaker 9: I happen to be taking it. I happen to be taking it. Hydroxychloroquine. I'm taking it. Hydroxychloroquine.
Speaker 0: Well, You shouldn't be taking it.
Speaker 5: Is there any evidence to suggest that as with malaria, it might be used as a prophylaxis against COVID nineteen?
Speaker 9: No. The answer is is no, And and the the evidence that you're talking about, John, is anecdotal evidence.
Speaker 12: A large new study links hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine to a higher risk of death in coronavirus patients.
Speaker 13: This is a study that was led by folks at Harvard and was published in The Lancet just today.
Speaker 21: Last week, The executive group of the solidarity trial decided to implement a temporary pause of the hydroxychloroquine arm of the trial because of concerns raised about the safety of the drug.
Speaker 12: The Food and Drug Administration is ending its emergency authorization for the use of hydrochloroquine to treat COVID 19. President Trump has repeatedly praised hydrochloroquine as a potential coronavirus treatment.
Speaker 5: This is the mother of all studies right now. This was 96,000 patients.
Speaker 22: This is not just a government culpability And, malfeasance with respect to hydroxychloroquine. This is academic malfeasance. There were 2 Fraudulent papers, 1 in New England Journal of Medicine, 1 in Lancet, they were withdrawn, and and the New England Journal of Medicine in Lancet acknowledged that they were fraudulent papers. They were scare papers to scare people on hydroxychloroquine. Since that time, there's been dozens of pile on, scare tactics in academics.
This isn't the government. This is people in my field in academic medicine who are committing academic fraud. I reviewed a paper. I'm a cardiologist. Theologist, I reviewed a paper that made it into the medical literature demonstrating that hydroxychloroquine causes a heart attack.
That hydroxychloroquine causes a giant scar in the heart. And I can tell you, I'm at Baylor in Dallas. We have the world's most recognized cardiac pathology program in the world. Our senior examiner has held in in his heart his hand in his hands, more human hearts than anybody in the history of mankind. I can tell you firsthand, hydroxychloroquine does not cause giant scars in the heart.
So academic medicine is committing fraud, Is committing, I think, a crime against humanity, there must be a motivation behind this that's much bigger than just democrat versus Republican.
Speaker 0: At any rate, after the last election, which was Demonstrably stolen. There was a huge and, I think, entirely justified demonstration in Washington. And as a believer in electoral democracy, although I regard our politics as theater now, I think it's important Honor the will of the electorate, even if they don't, you know, entirely understand what they're voting for. I think they were taken in by Trump. That's irrelevant.
They had every right to demonstrate. But by over focusing on the PSIOP in the capitol building, the media was able to give the impression that the nation's capitol was sort of overrun by brown shirts and Klansmen. If you carefully examine both the videos taken inside the Capitol and the way the event was covered and reported, It was obviously staged to provide footage, you know, for the talking heads To define this ridiculous invasion as an attempted coup.
Speaker 15: The peaceful Transfer of power, the cornerstone of American democracy, seemed a highly abstract concept today as Trump supporters clashed with police as they tried and succeeded to storm the congress where America's elected leaders had gathered to certify the election victory of Joe Biden.
Speaker 10: Our nation, so long the beacon of light and hope for democracy, It's come to such a dark moment.
Speaker 9: I am in tears today to see this scene. This is not an American insane.
Speaker 11: Could you ever imagine seeing that in America?
Speaker 12: Did we just witness a coup attempt in the United States of America, or was this an insurrection?
Speaker 11: How would you describe what happened
Speaker 9: on that day? Was it a coup, an act of domestic terrorism? What was it in your view?
Speaker 13: Some local political experts you spoke with today are calling this an attempted coup.
Speaker 10: This was, by any dictionary definition, a coup attempt.
Speaker 9: Any other country this was happening, it would be called a coup. We'd we'd call it that. So that's what it is.
Speaker 16: It was very clearly an attempt to carry out A, coup to overthrow the elected government.
Speaker 0: This takes my breath away. These people don't know what a coup is? What do you do when you mount a coup? Well, you take over the media. Right?
You often kill the incumbent. You know, you have troops take over. Okay. Did anything like that happen this time? Have these people ever heard of Chile?
You know, their 911 in 1973, that was a cool. There have been coups that our CIA has has Cultivated and paid for and encouraged, and they're usually pretty bloody, and they usually mean an attempt to take over the government. And I don't see any evidence that these people who put their feet up on a few desks and banged on a few doors We're trying to take over the government, and I also think that a number of them were agents as usual. Now it's obvious that the Capitol Police, and that's a very, very Powerful and well organized protective force. K?
Somehow that day, they weren't. Somehow that day, members of that force were ushering people into the capitol building. It's there for your eyes to see. It took down the barricades and guided people into the capitol. Police
Speaker 23: are squabbling with protesters. Oh, there we go. And they just reached the castle.
Speaker 2: The police here are willing to work with us and cooperate peacefully. But it's like our first amendment allowed. Give you that. The show. Alright.
Nothing are going to be heard. Everybody, this must be peaceful. This has to be peaceful. We have the right to peacefully assemble.
Speaker 0: And then The most absurd footage of all was the footage of this lone capitol policeman Standing with his club, trying to hold off this horde of, you know, white supremacists coming up the stairs. Right? Now if you watch this carefully and and try to maintain your calm of mind, you'll notice, first of all, that there's a guy standing Right on the other side of the landing that he's on, you know, filming him, it's it's like a movie is being filmed. Then you say to yourself, but wait a minute. The footage I'm watching was also taken on somebody's cell phone.
Right? It was staged.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 0: But the language around it was so hysterical. Right? And I've learned this in studying these PsiOps over the years, it doesn't matter what you're actually looking at. You know? It doesn't matter what you see with your eyes.
If the voice over narration is sufficiently compelling, you will tend to have that color your understanding of what you're seeing. Okay. Now, it didn't look like a coo. It looked like a kind of, lark or frolic, you know. It looked like, you know, what this looked like, you know, a panty raid on campus.
And this marks the moment when conspiracy theory is explicitly equated with domestic terrorism, okay? Now things, as I said, were drifting in this direction from the time that David Cameron and Francois Hollande sort of likened conspiracy theory to extremist movements that threaten people's lives, you know. So we've come a long way from the CIA memo in 1967, which passingly relates To, you know, the fact that what the conspiracy theorists were arguing about the Warren report, referred to material used, You know, deliberately contrived by communist propagandists. Now it's been flipped, to, make the urgent and kind of hysterical claim Often, that conspiracy theory is a form of domestic terrorism, and it's based on this fantasy Of a kind of, you know, like this brown shirts out in the streets of the United States and that Trump supporters are are Nazis. You know?
The Nazi threat was used several times over the last, you know, year or so, to try to take the gloss off of really huge anti lockdown demonstrations, fairly big ones in Michigan, you know, which were then tarred with the brush of Nazism by this supposed plot by, you know, bearded Neo Nazis to kidnap Gretchen Whitmer, the governor of Michigan. That to me is so explicitly phony that I just have to laugh.
Speaker 24: Earlier today, attorney general Dana Nessel was joined by officials from the Department of Justice and the FBI to announce state and federal charges against 13 members of 2 militia groups who are preparing to kidnap and possibly kill me.
Speaker 1: Now a big investigative report on BuzzFeed News has revealed a bunch of new details and particularly about the role that FBI informants played in the plot And breaking it up. We,
Speaker 8: you know, we always knew even from the moment the case was announced that there was at least 1 informant, in fact, at least 2, and that they had sort of been in the plot. The great revelation, you know, of our reporting and also what's come out in the court documents and in other media, including the Detroit Free Press, which has done a great job on this, is that there were as many as 12, informants. And that those informants played a much larger And, you know, more active role. One of the informants actually rose to become the 2nd in command of the Wolverine watchmen.
Speaker 0: And then when there was a big, Gigantic demonstration in Berlin. It was like a 1000000 people, and Bobby Kennedy addressed them and Got right down to it and said they're gonna call this a Nazi get together.
Speaker 19: I'm back at home in the United States. The newspapers are saying that I came here today to speak to about 5,000 Nazis. And tomorrow, they're gonna report that, yes, I was here, and I spoke to maybe 3 to 5 1,000 Nazis. But I look at this crowd, and I see the opposite of Nazism. I see people who love democracy, people who want open government, people who want leaders that are not gonna lie to them.
Leaders will not make up arbitrary rules and regulations to orchestrate obedience of the population. I look at this crowd. I see all the flags of Europe. I see people of every color. I see people from every nation, every religion, all caring about human dignity, about children's health, about political freedom.
This is the opposite of Nazism.
Speaker 0: We were told that a contingent of these Nazis actually Storm the Reichstag. Right? I mean, seriously, can we just get a grip here? You know, that's theater. That's theatrics, and the people protesting lockdown are not Nazis.
Speaker 14: I will I'm going to go down under the ground because somebody tells me that debt's Coming around, and I will not carry myself down to There's been rumors of war and wars that have been. The meaning of life has been lost in Instead of learning to live, they are learning to die. Let me When someone is pulling the wool over me. And if this war comes and There's always been people that have If I had the movies and the riches and crowns, I'm buying the whole world and I've Change things around. I throw all the guns in the tanks in the sea.
Let me drink From the waters where the mountain streams flood. Let the slug of wildflowers flow free through my blood.
reSee.it AI Summary
Professor Mark Crispin Miller of New York University reveals the connection between the coup of 1963 and the current state of affairs with COVID-19. He traces the path from the resistance movements of the sixties to the present-day "Fourth Industrial Revolution." Miller highlights the historical context, including a little-known movement from the early 20th century, to shed light on the mass injection policies adopted by governments worldwide. This hidden history, as presented by Miller, carries significant implications for the 21st century.
@JoshWalkos - Champagne Joshi
2020: A PROPAGANDA MASTERPIECE, PART THREE – THE COUP OF 1963 TO COVID 2021 Professor Mark Crispin Miller of New York University illustrates how the sudden overthrow of political freedom and bodily sovereignty, nominally triggered of necessity by the emergence of a deadly novel pathogen, has in truth been heading straight for us since November 22, 1963, when President Kennedy was assassinated in Dallas, Texas. From the revolutionary resistance of the sixties to the "Fourth Industrial Revolution" of 2021; from a little-known elite movement of the early 20th century that was committed to ridding the world of the "feeble-minded", to the monolithic policy of mass injection embraced by governments the world over today..:as the 21st century reaches adulthood, Mark Crispin Miller presents the hidden history you ignore at your peril.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Propaganda is not just misinformation, it shapes our identities. The speaker discusses the rise of a vaccine cult and the historical abuse and exploitation of black people by the medical establishment. They argue that conspiracy theories are often dismissed because they challenge our perception of those in power. The speaker also highlights the role of propaganda in shaping the narratives we are exposed to. They suggest that a further traumatic shock, such as a staged alien invasion, may be used to maintain control. The speaker emphasizes the importance of alternative news sources, global resistance, and protecting freedoms. They have also come to appreciate the significance of national sovereignty, the second amendment, and the family unit.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You know, propaganda isn't just misinformation. It's it's it's a it's a source of your very identity. People are defining themselves as anti Trump, pro mask, pro vaccine people. This, vaccine cult that is now, you know, reigning supreme and wreaking untold havoc, and I mean literally untold havoc on people's lives and bodies, It was actually a long time coming, and we have been gradually prepared for it, really for the last several Gates. Black people, are entitled to their so called vaccine hesitancy.
That is a perfectly rational suspicion on their part of the intentions of a medical establishment that has a long, horrible history of abusing and exploiting those people. One definition of conspiracy theory that I favor is, something that if true, you couldn't handle it. The year 2020 And then, the first half of twenty twenty one have comprised, a a Global propaganda spectacle, of unprecedented scale and sophistication. To come at this Recent history as a student of propaganda is to recognize that that Many of the narratives we've been hit with, serially hit with, were actually calculated when they have seemed to be accidental or organic. You know, the intelligence agencies, Generally, have been, you know, skilled for a very long time at manipulating events in this way.
This is a history most educated people don't know so that it seems, outlandish to suggest that, you know, we might be living through something similar now. One definition of conspiracy theory that I favor is, something that if true, you couldn't handle it. Okay. That's what a conspiracy theory is. So, to suggest that the government, you know, blew JFK's brains out, Pretty much at high noon in broad daylight, that the government killed King, the government killed Bobby, that the government flew Aircraft into the twin towers.
I mean, these things are are unimaginable to many people because they just don't want to go there. So that, you know, an appreciable component of the American electorate or the American people It's, afflicted with a kind of repression the way Abused children often, you know, have trouble thinking of what their parents did to them. They wouldn't do that. They looked after me. They protected us.
Right? I mean, they they have what what Lance DeHaven Smith, calls in his indispensable history of conspiracy theory, conspiracy theory in America. He calls it a sentimental view of executive power. There's this idea that the president is kind of our father and, we therefore think it's impossible that he and the agencies he directs, at least nominally, Would do something as fiendish as X or Y, right? They just don't want to go there.
You know, I've been saying for some time that 2020 had been heading towards us since 1963, okay? Because That era saw the, you know, serial destruction, murder of 4 figures who all in different ways We're really genuinely threatening the system with change, the tumult of the 60s insofar as it represented a move toward a genuinely revolutionary, alliance, you know, of the have nots. That was Basically crushed by the assassinations, you know, that Martin Luther King was planning a poor people's march on Washington. Very important. Not a black people's march, a poor people's march.
So you had taken a turn away from civil rights per se, mainly in the South, toward a larger, more revolutionary political movement and they put an end to that pretty expeditiously when he was assassinated. But, you know, that extends too in in in different ways to the Kennedy brothers as well as Malcolm X. I mean, there was really it's not romanticism to say that that was a crucial moment of awakening on the part of many important constituencies, populations, right? And, there was a kind of Serial devastation of that, that energy with all those murders accompanied by, you know, Things like the murder of Fred Hampton in Chicago, he was, you know, organizing Appalachian whites, Hispanic street gangs, and black Greek gangs along with the Panthers, that's not anything like BLM. Okay?
That's really forming alliances. That's talking about solidarity. He was 21 years old. Right? Well, they had to kill him too.
And then in various ways, the FBI and the CIA continued to eat away at, infiltrate, Screw up, leftist politics, and that kind of, you know, created the world we live in today.
Speaker 1: Right. Along with Vietnam, which Which in you could say is a direct result of the deaths of the Kennedys and King and Malcolm, all of whom, at some point or another, in different ways, we're either pulling out troops in the case of Kennedy.
Speaker 2: We would expect to withdraw a 1,000 Men from, South Vietnam before the end of the year.
Speaker 1: Or were speaking, voicing their opposition in the case of King.
Speaker 3: The bombs in Vietnam exploded home. They destroyed the dream and possibility Far decent America.
Speaker 0: And and it's worth noting that in the context of 2020, what happened was. Not that people were persuaded by the peace protesters. I mean, a lot of people just sort of disliked them. It was that the casualty rate had become too high. Too many Americans had lost people to that war.
It was a meat grinder. They were either dead, you know, their Loved ones were either dead or, you know,
Speaker 1: crippled,
Speaker 0: crazy, you know, blinded, whatever. At a certain point, you can't simply bullshit people out of that kind of experience. And I think it's directly comparable to the toll that these so called vaccines are taking on people now. You know, there is such a stark divide between the media's depiction of these vaccinations, so called, and how safe and effective they are, and what we hear from people all around us more and more every day. You see comments on social media, you know, hundreds of them.
I mean, people are really being Horribly, sickened and killed by these injections, and at a certain point, it's gonna be impossible to keep a lid on that. Now that may require a further shock to the system. Okay? Now I'm getting ahead of us. Right?
For some time now, we've been living with this weird, split between The daily experience of more and more people on the ground, right, more and more people on the ground and the and the sort of hermetic fantasy, projected by the media that is supposed to be connected to the real world and has nothing to do with it. So we live one thing and more and more we look up at that picture sure, and we can see it bears no relation to what we're living through, none at all. I think something like that happened in the Soviet Union, right? Their propaganda simply could not continue to pacify, people. You know, it was just The distance was too great.
Something like that is happening now. We've got, Bruce Springsteen, on his radio show, saying, mister president, put on a fucking mask.
Speaker 4: With all respect, sir, show some consideration and care for your countrymen and your country. Put on a fucking mask.
Speaker 0: We've got Jane Fonda saying in an interview, I hate to say it, That COVID was a gift to the left. She says this, right? A gift to the left.
Speaker 4: COVID is God's gift to the left.
Speaker 0: Joan Baez paints this beatific portrait of doctor Fauci. I mean, what is this? This is scary, you know, as far as I'm concerned. This guy might as well be, you know, belting down adrenochrom. I mean, I you know, She's got a beatific portrait of the satanist.
Right? I mean, it might as well be one. And then you got Samuel L. Jackson saying stay the fuck home.
Speaker 5: Stay the fuck at home. The rona is spreading. This shit is no joke. It's no time to work or roam. The way you can fight it is simple, my friends.
Just stay the fuck
Speaker 0: His home has about 22 rooms in it. You know? It's easy for him to stay home. They can just jump into a swimming pool. I mean, what is it with these people?
Speaker 1: Well, of course, you've already said it. It's it's Trump derangement syndrome, and it was, you know, positioned as if you go out, if you don't mask up, if you are near other people. You are, not only endangering others, you must support Donald Trump.
Speaker 6: Yeah.
Speaker 1: You know? I mean, I've seen people with, with shirts that Say vaccinated, not a Republican. Unbelievable. So they just made it about that, and they really, honestly, must believe That they are saving lives, right, and their own life. Right?
I mean, in other words, they have the full, like, weight of of virtue. You know, they've got the Full complement of virtue on their side.
Speaker 6: That's right.
Speaker 1: And and they truly and honestly believe that.
Speaker 0: That's right.
Speaker 1: And and then there's some doubt creeping into some of them at Some levels about, you know, the the amount and the kind of the mitigation so called or the, you know, the new regulations or, Oh, maybe vaccine passports are a little weird. I don't know. But but maybe they're not. And if as long as there seems to be a Trump contingent that opposes them and it's associated with Trump as opposed to people who may or may not like Trump but just are Against these obviously authoritarian measures, they are automatically opposed to anyone Who's who's, you know, talking the language of freedom, etcetera. You know, it's just freedom has become, the enemy.
Speaker 0: That's Right?
Speaker 3: Freedom. Freedom. Freedom.
Speaker 1: You know, it's the enemy of health, and and all that remains is to stay alive. Right? I mean, That's the thing. It's this weird, Ernst Becker denial of death clinging to material existence at all costs, even if it means the quality of life of your Children is utterly devastated.
Speaker 0: Right? Right.
Speaker 1: I mean, I mean, and that you can't go to church, and you can't go to the theater, and you can't sing, and you can't dance. I mean, which is why, of course, those French protests that you've sent around are so great where they do the flash mobs and dance. I mean, it reminds me of Emma Goldman's line. Right? If I can't dance, you can keep your revolution.
But the anyway, so I mean so just we have to try to put ourselves in the minds of our former friends on the left, Right? Who who really think they are the champions of science. As Fauci said, I am science. You know? Yeah.
Right?
Speaker 6: It's very dangerous, Chuck, because a lot of what you're seeing as attacks on me, quite frankly, are attacks on science.
Speaker 1: You know, we've seen some of the Fauci emails, And it's clear that he doesn't believe what he's saying about masks. Even though these emails seem to reveal this Incredibly duplicitous characters changing the levels of herd immunity that we need to reach on a political basis, on the basis of what he thinks is possible. He's Admitting to noble lies and yet that is not discussed in the left media. None of that is known, it seems, to the NPR listener, the New York Times listener. They haven't seen the emails in that light.
They they're they're cooing about how they don't reveal any wrongdoing.
Speaker 7: BuzzFeed News and The Washington Post both published stories this week that detailed, Washington Post both published stories this week that detailed hundreds, if not thousands of pages of documents that they Obtained that were essentially just the contents of doctor Anthony Fauci's emails from the early days of the pandemic. He had thousands of emails that were just Coming in from people throughout various points of his life, whether it was former colleagues, various medical professionals. And you can see Fauci's sort of taking time to respond or at least acknowledge that, he received so many questions and queries. He seemed very interested, 1st and foremost, On providing sound and and scientific guidance.
Speaker 0: Well, the thing is, John, that they in the state they're in, they can't They can't think about it at all. I mean, if you say to them, throughout those emails, Fauci is basically convinced that masks don't work. You know, I think 3 emails he makes this point and there he's echoing the consensus of all the most rigorous studies. I've had arguments about this on Facebook, you know, which I revisited ill advisedly. And, you know, I I get these, you know, hot tempered replies from people saying, well, he since then, he changed his view based on blah.
It's It's just something made up, you know. They cannot bring themselves even to perceive that there's a contradiction there. Okay? Now, here here are the facts of the matter. I'm just going to go into this as an example.
Until early April, Fauci and the CDC very publicly echo The consensus of those studies that masks don't work, okay, that they just have a kind of symbolic value. He even says this on 60 minutes.
Speaker 6: People should not be walking around with masks.
Speaker 4: You're sure of it? Because people are listening really No. Closely to this.
Speaker 6: Right now, people should not be there's no reason to be walking around with a mask. When you're in the middle of an outbreak, Wearing a mask might make people feel a little bit better, and it might even block a a droplet,
Speaker 0: But it's not providing the perfect protection that people think that it is. Then in early April, they all flip. And this is just after George Gao, the head of Chinese CDC said you got to wear a mask. Okay. There again, China takes the lead.
Okay. Then later in the fall, Fauci says, why I was lying because I was afraid there would be a run on, PPE in hospitals.
Speaker 6: Now getting back to your first question, Which was what about month or so or 2 or 3 ago when people were saying you don't really need to wear a mask? Well, the reason for that is That we were concerned, the public health community, and many people were saying this, were concerned that it was at a time When personal protective equipment, including the n 95 masks and the surgical masks, were in very short supply, And we wanted to make sure that the people, namely the healthcare workers, who are brave enough to put themselves in harm ways To take care of people who you know were infected with the coronavirus and the danger of them getting infected, we did not want them to be Without the equipment that they needed. So there was not enthusiasm about going out and everybody buying a mask or getting a mask. We were afraid that that would deter away from the people who really needed it.
Speaker 0: Meanwhile, the World Health Organization continues to echo that consensus until early June. Okay? In early June, they flip and they go from saying in countless videos, you know, people very Talking very slowly so that the audience understands that masks will not do you any good. And all of a sudden, they're saying you have to wear masks. Okay?
Hello.
Speaker 4: Today, I'd like to talk to you about how to wear non medical mask, also known as fabric mask.
Speaker 0: Now There's a BBC report, which a woman, you know, a reporter for the BBC is talking about what she's heard from her Sources inside the World Health Organization, she said that the official response to her question as to why they changed was that there were subsequent studies that demonstrated that masks work. However, she had a source in the organization who told her off the record that it was really due to political pressure. Okay. Now I've just made a kind of complicated point. K?
These 2 different agencies flipped at 2 different times in their position on masking. Fauci gives one explanation belatedly. It doesn't say anything about subsequent studies proving that they work, and it differs from what the WHO said, which is then contradicted by somebody else at the WHO. Obviously, it was for political reasons that had to do with the propaganda narrative. Now if I tried to explain this to one of the people you're talking about, They would just bristle, you know.
They don't wanna hear it. They'll come up with something. They're always these people are always making the it's like arguing with a committed communist In the thirties, you know, they'll just come up with some bullshit answer because they don't wanna go there. They are completely you know, propaganda isn't just misinformation. It's it's it's a it's a source of your very identity.
People are defining themselves as anti Trump, pro mask, pro vaccine people.
Speaker 1: Even even It becomes ideology.
Speaker 0: It's it's ideology. Right? It is it is profound. You can't it's traumatic remember what Rachel Maddow Said when when they changed the rules on masks, she said, I'm gonna have to rewire my brain. She actually said that.
A rare moment of honesty from Rachel Maddow, You know? Part of it is that
Speaker 8: I feel like I'm gonna have to rewire myself so that when I see somebody out in the world who's not wearing a mask, I don't instantly think You are a threat, or you are selfish, or you are a COVID denier, and you definitely haven't been vaccinated.
Speaker 0: You know, when they started Telling people after World War I that the Germans were not the Huns after all, I mean, people had a lot of trouble with that. Right? So, I mean, that's an extreme example of a process we all have to go through. We all have to go through. It is actually hard to believe that The most exalted authorities on public health, right, the most exalted government authorities on public health, And the most the best known and most revered philanthropists, you know, who whose whose names are associated with helping to bring, you know, well-being and and and long lives to the dark continent of Africa.
And there's Bill Gates with I is he wearing a piss helmet? I'm not sure, but he's administering an oral vaccine to a little black baby. Right? Oh, they're so good. It's hard to believe that the and doctor Fauci, the soft spoken earnest doctor Fauci, it's hard to believe that these people or actually, malevolent.
I'm I'm speaking from the heart here. I'm not in a classroom now. Every single Every single, recommendation that they have made, every single claim that they have made, you know, about remedies, about masks, about vaccines. Every single thing that they have not brought up, right, like vitamin d, the importance of vitamin d and so on. Every single one of these things is is is deleterious for people's health.
It is it is it is the opposite of what a caring government would do. You know, we've heard the question, what would an honest government have done in in dealing with the Kennedy assassination? That's a very useful intellectual act exercise because an honest government would have done none of the things that they did in investigating that assassination, right? Well, what would a caring government do? It would have done none of the things that they pushed.
It would not they'd never have recommended lockdowns, right, which in themselves have killed literally millions of people all around the world, right? So, you know, again, we have to stress the fact That conspiracy theory is something that if true, you couldn't handle it, and this is the hardest of all to handle.
Speaker 9: As your president, I'm announcing tonight a new plan to require more Americans to be vaccinated To combat those blocking public health, children ages 12 and older who are eligible For a vaccine now and children ages 11 and under who are not yet eligible, the safest thing for your child 12 and older It's to get them vaccinated. They get vaccinated for a lot of things. That's it. Get them vaccinated. Parents, Please get your teenager vaccinated.
Now if you're a parent of a young child, you're wondering when will it be when will it be the vaccine available for them, I strongly support independent scientific review for vaccine uses for children under 12. My first responsibility as president is to protect the American people to make sure we have enough vaccine for every American, including enough boosters for every American. Even as we execute this plan at home, we need to continue fighting the virus overseas, continue to be the arsenal of There's nothing, not a single thing we're unable to do if we do it together. So let's stay together. God bless you all and all those who continue to serve on the front lines of this pandemic.
And may god protect our troops. Get vaccinated.
Speaker 0: This, vaccine cult that is now, you know, reigning supreme and wreaking untold havoc, and I mean literally untold havoc on people's lives and bodies, was actually a long time coming and we have been gradually prepared for it, really for the last several decades. Pretty much ever since the act was passed in 1987, indemnifying The vaccine manufacturers and so on
Speaker 1: The VICA Act, the Vaccine Injury Compensation Act.
Speaker 0: Exactly. I mean, Roughly sort of since then, we've been increasingly sort of habituated to this view of vaccines as the lynchpin of modern health and well-being. I mean, this is completely misleading, right? I mean, what has conquered You know, seriously incapacitating diseases and epidemics in the past was primarily improvements in sanitation, Clean water, improved diet and things like that. That's the reason why we've grown healthier.
And in fact, as We have been subjected to ever more vaccinations over the decades, as our children have been subjected to an ever more Excessive vaccine schedule dictated by the CDC, they've actually become less healthy, neurologically more prone to all kinds of terrible conditions and likelier to die of so called SIDS. But the implication That all those shots are actually very dangerous for children, right? That they pose a threat that they don't make us healthier. That's another one of those inferences that people really are not ready to draw. So rather than draw that inference, they will think these people in the white lab coats are really benign.
They're really working on ways to make us well. This is sort of fed into this bizarre, cultic view of the syringe as our as our one and only deliverance from all these these evils, and it's especially perverse that they should be rolling out a universal vaccine mandate for a a disease, you know, that has like a 99.97 survival rate. A disease that you can get over very quickly and easily if you treat it with HCQ or Ivermectin early on. I mean, it isn't really as if it's that serious, right? I mean, of of the so supposed 500,000 people who've been killed by COVID.
Right? Only 6% are are said to have died of COVID alone. The other, you know, 94% have 2 or more comorbidities and they're usually quite old. Why do we need a universal vaccination Mandate for everybody, including children who have strong natural immunity of the disease, you know? So I I can't believe people would have fallen for this.
People have been so terrorized by the plague of COVID nineteen that they are have been desperate for those injections. Right? And if you track the consequences of those injections honestly, If you dig down deep into the vaccine adverse event reporting system, VAERS, if you if you take the Trouble to dig down into the descriptions of how people have died, you find horrifying graphic descriptions of agonized death. It's nightmarish, and there's a lot of it because that system only represents maybe less than 1% of the actual events.
Speaker 1: As Harvard found in 2010.
Speaker 0: Harvard found in 2010. That's exactly right. The same year that Bill Gates gave his TED talk about Saving the planet, in which he said passingly that it would be a good idea to lower the global population by 10 to 15% using vaccines and other measures.
Speaker 10: Now the world today has 6,800,000,000 people. That's headed up to about 9,000,000,000. Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15%.
Speaker 0: He's actually been saying that for years. Never quite explains how that works because it doesn't make any sense. How vaccines can, you know
Speaker 1: Well, supposedly because the children will be more likely to survive, therefore, parents in third world countries will be less likely to have an Overabundance of children.
Speaker 0: Yeah. But if if they don't survive because of their conditions, then there wouldn't be an overabundance of children. It doesn't make any sense on its face. It's just an excuse for getting needles into the arms of as many Africans as possible. Let's talk about this.
Okay? Let's talk about Kenya, for example. Okay? In Kenya, this was in 2014, a Catholic doctor noticed something Funny about a vaccination drive that was suddenly initiated by the WHO, the World Health Organization, which had lately been taken over by Bill Gates. What was funny about it was that they were supposedly immunizing the vaccinees with, an anti tetanus serum when tetanus is not a problem in Kenya, and they were restricting the injection program to girls and women of childbearing age.
That was a little odd. So there was no tetanus risk to males. I mean, there was no tetanus risk at all. The whole thing was completely fishy. So, there was a Kenyan Catholic Doctors Association, they got some of the specimens of this vaccine and sent them to labs in South Africa and they discovered from that examination of the substance that was being used that it was actually, an anti fertility vaccine.
You know?
Speaker 1: Well, they'd combined tetanus toxoid with human gonadotropin. Right?
Speaker 0: That's right.
Speaker 1: And the combination was creating Spontaneous abortions
Speaker 0: and Right.
Speaker 1: And over the 5 shot protocol, which was also unusual, it was perhaps It's creating permanent infertility or certainly was slated to. Right. And, this would been a technique developed by an Indian doctor 20 years before.
Speaker 0: Well, I did a deep dive into this whole thing and discovered that in Honduras and the Philippines back in the early nineties, Again, Catholic doctors noticed something funny about vaccination programs that the Rockefellers were funding. This is all eugenics. Okay? This is this is a history that we ought to learn in high school and college and yet it's a history that no one knows. Right?
Because it would sort of upend our conception of, you know, the elites in the 20th century because eugenics Was a pseudoscience, you know, heartily embraced by Woodrow Wilson and Oliver Wendell Holmes and HG Wells and George Bernard Shaw, W. E. B. Du Bois. They actually believed that it was a good idea and it was possible to get the fit to procreate like rabbits, that means the rich basically, and the unfit, not to procreate and, you know, there are different levels of severity with which the unfit could be rendered incapable of procreation, but it did entail sterilization laws, right?
And there was this infamous Supreme Court case, Buck versus Bell, which, focused on a young Appalachian woman who was sterilized against Her will, on the grounds that she's feeble minded, which is a a term that was often used to justify these sterilizations, you know, She was not feeble minded, but, Oliver Wendell Holmes notoriously penned the majority opinion and the line that that is in the The halls of infamy forever is, 3 generations of imbecile is enough. Okay? So, they came down in favor of the Same sterilization laws that Hitler partly used as a model for his Nuremberg laws. The eugenics movement in this country was lavishly funded by the Rockefellers, and the families of Carnegie and Harriman. They funded not only American Eugenics researchers, but a number of Germans as well, At least 2 of whom went on to work in Hitler's government in charge of health programs, which were euthanasia programs.
Now in the thirties, when Hitler came to power, the eugenics press was overjoyed and expressed their gratitude and excitement that here was a head of state who really understood their philosophy. While the holocaust, was kind of an embarrassment, right? That footage of the cadavers figures in the striped pajamas, That was the upshot of Hitler's investment in eugenics. So they had to go underground and rebrand. And they rebranded as the population control movement.
So in 1952, the population council was formed and that was also a Rockefeller funded
Speaker 11: project.
Speaker 3: There are still about the same number of babies being born each year. But today, Deaths are cut in half or better, especially among children. The old balance is upset. Those who live now instead of dying are added each year to the number of people in the community. Of course, as more and more people are added, their needs increase.
New industries are being developed to provide more goods. But whatever is done, it is not enough. But fortunately, this need not happen anymore. Today, things have changed. Modern science has given us a key that makes possible a new kind of personal freedom, family planning.
Speaker 0: So it was no longer called Eugenics. It had a different name and it seemed sort of, you know, environmentally friendly. By the time you get to the sixties and the population bomb, the best seller by Paul Ehrlich, who's still with us and still kind of a militant Fusian, I mean they all believe, as Malthus did, that population growth necessarily It results in famine and misery and poverty, so we have to cut the numbers of the poor as radically and ruthlessly as possible. Ehrlich was one who popularized this and gave it a faintly green sheen, you know, that it seemed like a Good idea. Now, if you read that book today, it starts out with this sort of horrified description of a trip to New Delhi, Paul Ehrlich and his wife, and he describes this disgusting scene of teeming humanity, you know, where there are Indians all over the place.
And I think some conservative outlet noted that, you know, there are parts of Paris that are just as crowded. There's definitely a kind of Racist and neocolonialist tilt to this kind of work.
Speaker 10: Yeah. It's a huge challenge that the places where Babies will be born are increasingly the toughest places in the world. You know, the the number of babies been born has peaked and is going down slightly, but the portion, that are born in Africa will go over the course of the century from about 22% today to about 50% by the end of the century.
Speaker 0: I don't think Bill Gates wants All those Africans to keep reproducing. And in fact, there's a a moment in a report, I think it's on 60 minutes, Steve Croft is interviewing Melinda Gates, and she ends up saying, and this is a way to keep from overpopulating the Earth.
Speaker 12: If you get into
Speaker 13: this work and you start to save these children, Will women just keep overpopulating the world? And thank goodness the converse is absolutely true.
Speaker 0: They're not overpopulating the earth. I mean, and if if any population is causing environmental destruction, it's extremely rich people like the Gates', you know, with their many mansions and their private planes.
Speaker 14: The billionaire has written a book called How TO Avoid Climate Disaster. In it, he confesses to being A quote, unquote imperfect messenger as he lives in large houses and travels by private jet. A study Conducted by Lund University in Sweden showed that in 2017, Gates took 59 flights by private jet, emitting about a1000 600 tons of c 02 compared to the global average of fewer than 5 tons per person.
Speaker 0: It's also the US military, which is the biggest polluter on the planet. Right?
Speaker 15: 59,000,000 metric tons of greenhouse gases. That's how much the US Defense Department Spewed into the atmosphere in 2017 alone, Brown University says the DOD is both the largest oil consumer and institutional polluter In the world, there are entire countries that don't emit as many fumes. Portugal, Finland, and Sweden to name a few.
Speaker 0: No. No. No. No. It's all those teeming masses of colored people and so on.
Right? In Honduras, in the Philippines, in Kenya, they have to do anything they can to lower the population. Right? I think this is key to that whole horrible year last year and what we're going through now as we're being increasingly threatened with forcible vaccination, so called forcible injection with a substance that is known to be extremely dangerous. It's experimental.
Right? This is a direct violation of the Nuremberg Code. Right? So, you know, we have to do everything we can to oppose it. I am actually, closely tracking the effect of these vaccines on black people in particular.
Alright? It's killed a lot of them. It's killed a lot more fairly famous black people than the media has let us See, start
Speaker 1: Starting with Hank Aaron.
Speaker 0: Well, starting with Hank Aaron. Right? Black people, are entitled to their so called vaccine hesitancy. That is a perfectly rational suspicion on their part of the intentions of a medical establishment that has a long, horrible history of abusing and exploiting those people.
Speaker 1: Beyond Tuskegee.
Speaker 0: Oh, Tuskegee everybody says Tuskegee. See, that's the thing about propaganda. Certain moments become iconic, and then you think that the whole history of abuse It's just that one thing. Okay? Tuskegee is the least of it.
It's just the thing we've heard of, but this horrible history, you know, of of torture and murder really. You know, goes back way early in 19th century and and up into the seventies When they're still sterilizing black women in certain states, you know, the Mississippi appendectomy.
Speaker 12: Mississippi appendectomies became a nickname For unnecessary hysterectomies on black women, largely performed at teaching hospitals as training for medical students. Born and raised in Mississippi, the renowned civil rights activist Fannie Lou Hamer was one of the most well known victims of these quote unquote appendectomies in 1960 1, when she underwent surgery to remove a tumor from her uterus. And in the south, it wasn't just Mississippi. North Carolina sterilized Over 7,600 people between the 19 thirties 19 seventies, 65% of whom were black women. A third of the sterilizations were done on girls under 18, even as young as 9 years old.
Speaker 0: So please don't mention Tuskegee. It's much worse than that. Okay? The thing is that vaccine hesitancy has now been defined as some kind of syndrome. You know, it's just something wrong with you if you're vaccine hesitant.
That's like conspiracy theory. It it is a way to represent your completely rational, Healthy rational suspicions is some kind of neurosis. Okay? Black people have that history of abuse in their DNA, the way Jews have the Holocaust in their DNA. That is it's direct comparison.
Okay? And and I say God bless them for being vaccine hesitant. And I'm also saying that I find it gratifying that that Vaccination rates in New York City among African Americans are the lowest of all.
Speaker 11: Just 60 some odd years ago, I couldn't walk through doors. Right. I couldn't eat at a diner because I was unclean. Right. I could not drink at a water fountain because I was unclean.
I couldn't swim in a pool because I was unclean. Right. I couldn't travel. We had to create a green book so we can travel safe in this country and I was free just 60 some odd years ago. Alright.
Do you understand what I'm saying to you? Yeah. Now here I am, Let me tell you something. Yeah. Any one of you in this audience right now that walks into a restaurant need where they say other people are dirty, you're a lottery Everyday safe catch.
Yeah. That's true. You are participating in it. Go eat it. Don't eat that.
I'm not here. Oh, and people Tell me what I'm gonna eat. Grow your own damn food. Yeah. Do what I used to do.
Yeah. And people say, well, I wanna travel, but find new alternative
Speaker 12: to travel. Right.
Speaker 0: People have to be mindful of the possibility, even the likelihood, of a further serious traumatic shock to come. And I think this may sound like it comes out of left field to many people, not to you, that it may involve some kind of for a seeming alien invasion. Right?
Speaker 1: They've certainly been pushing it, and many people seem to be aware of that, actually.
Speaker 0: Well, indeed. I mean, I find think it's always striking when some subject suddenly, is everywhere we look. Right? CBS News has Suddenly been all over UFOs and aliens.
Speaker 4: The long awaited Pentagon report on UFOs has finally been released, and it echoes reporting from 60 minutes That plenty of unidentified flying objects remain just that, unidentified and mysterious. Here's David Martin. This strange encounter with an unidentified flying object is one of more than 140 US intelligence cannot explain.
Speaker 0: And Obama recently said something about UFOs, and George w Bush recently said something. Why is this a thing all of a sudden?
Speaker 16: When it comes to aliens, There's some things I just can't tell you, on air. But what what is true, and I'm I'm actually being serious here, is is that, there are, there's footage and records of objects in the skies that we don't know exactly what they are. We can't explain how they moved, their trajectory.
Speaker 17: When you were in office, and I don't know when this happened or if it happened, Did you go through the secret files, the UFO documents? Because if I'm president, that'd The first thing I did.
Speaker 4: You know, it's funny. My daughters asked the very same question.
Speaker 17: They did. Yeah. Would you be allowed to tell your daughters what was in those files?
Speaker 4: No.
Speaker 17: You are not? No. Now that you're out of office, you can do anything you want. Right?
Speaker 9: True. Yeah.
Speaker 4: But I'm not telling you.
Speaker 17: You're not telling. You're not telling me what? Are you not telling me that you looked at them?
Speaker 4: I'm not telling you nothing.
Speaker 0: Why is this a thing all of a sudden? Right? Well, what better distraction, what better way to terrify the shit out of people than to mount what looks like and alien invasion. They have tremendous technological abilities, they they have an advanced grasp of holography, they could Definitely have flying saucers overhead that'll actually be government aircraft, the likes of which we haven't seen. There could be light shows in the sky.
There could be directed energy attacks on some city or other, right, which they may well wax. Who knows? They have the the capability to terrify us in the way that Orson Welles did with his radio adaptation of War of the World, which has now come back as an epic TV special. Right?
Speaker 2: Room of broadcasting building. I'm speaking from the roof of broadcasting building, New York City. The Bells you hear are ringing to warn the people to evacuate the city as martians approach. Our army is wiped out.
Speaker 11: Can anyone hear me? This is what the end of humanity looks like.
Speaker 0: You know, I used to Scoff the idea of predictive programming. I no longer do. There will be things in the media that then end up coming true. Right? I mean, in many ways, 911 looked like a lot of disaster movies we've been watching.
Speaker 1: Trust me. Everything's gonna be
Speaker 0: So we've all seen Independence Day. There are countless movies about hostile alien invasions. That's a projection, you know. That's a projection by the powers that be because they have devastated continents and killed indigenous peoples and, you know, raped the land Forever, right? So, naturally, they they think in terms of an alien force that will do the same.
It'll be a kind of magnified version of themselves. Right? What I'm saying is people have got to be prepared, you know, no matter how scared they are at first, to maintain somewhere in their minds the idea that this could be bogus. Okay? Because the sooner people tumble to that fact, the better off we'll be.
I mean, some few people called the Kennedy assassination as as a, you know, charade, that whole narrative right away. Well, I mean, Minsulandria was 1. Few people could see that. And there are some few people who knew right away that 911 It was not as advertised. Right?
I wasn't one of them. I go pretend to be. But, you know, this time, I mean, it's possible that what we're living through is a sign of the desperation of those interests to get this all accomplished as soon as possible, right, before the economy completely implodes. I hope that's true. I hope they are desperate and I hope they fail and we have to do everything we can to make sure they do.
So that means, you know, growing our numbers as much as possible, getting along with each other in opposition to what they're doing. It means, bearing in mind, the possible necessity of actually going back to something like Samizdat if the Internet should become completely unusable.
Speaker 1: What do you mean by Samizdat for people who don't know?
Speaker 0: Yeah. Samastat was the Soviet practice or the practice, in Russia under the Soviets of secret mimeograph centers that would, print out the news, the truth, and then surreptitiously distribute the mimeograph Copies all over the place. I mean, it was a fairly successful version of what the White Rose tried to do in Berlin under the Nazis. It was just kids who, You know, through these leaflets all over the place, they ended up all being beheaded by the Nazis. I should add that while we try to Form alliances with other American, subgroups and so on, we should also be forging alliances with our counterparts abroad, right, because it is a global threat, We need a global resistance.
Right? I mean, I you know, my experience of organizing is limited to having run the Faculty resistance to NYU's hideous real estate expansion plan. So, you know, when it comes to this kind of serious, anti totalitarian organizing, I defer to others.
Speaker 1: How how can we how can people educate themselves? What are some of the best places to go?
Speaker 0: Well, the best places to go tend to be the ones that have been listed as the most, untrustworthy, you know, the ones that are most often defamed, you know, whether it's Global Research, Adele Big Tree is Highwire, Children's Health Defense, their publication, The Defender. There's really a lot of, alternative outlets There
Speaker 1: James Corbett.
Speaker 0: James definitely James Corbett. The Corbett report is indispensable. The last American vagabond, that's Whitney Webb's Outfit my own news from underground, you know, at at markchristinmiller.com. I mean, we all share each other's work as much as we possibly can. I think it would be a good idea, as soon as we can do it, to create something like, a proper news organization that operates online.
It's kinda like what I do with my listserv, but there'd be, like, 10 of me. It would have a budget for a couple of really seasoned investigative reporters, and It would also entail a paper edition on the weekends that would be circulated throughout churches, synagogues, and mosques. Okay? I think people have got to get used to reading paper again, you know? And so that when the moment comes when they hit the kill kill switch, We'll still be able to put stuff out on paper.
The great reset, which we're being pushed toward, Will be, if it succeeds, something like communism for all of us at the ground level. You know, that kind of,
Speaker 1: Authoritarian communism.
Speaker 0: Authoritarian communism. Right? I'm talking about Stalinism or Maoism. So everybody has to say the same thing and everybody will be equally poor, Everybody will be equally dependent, right? That's at ground level, it's authoritarian communism and at the higher levels, it will be, kind of plutocratic fascism.
Speaker 18: See innovations we are seeing today in terms of artificial intelligence, the Internet of Things, cloud computing, Advanced robotics constitute a new face in human development.
Speaker 12: Binder's touch.
Speaker 18: The world will grow more together in the digital age. We are becoming more interdependent. We will have not less. We will have more globalization. People say sometimes, yes.
It's a digital revolution. No. It's not just a digital revolution. It is many other areas. It's brain research, nanotechnology, and I could go on and on.
See life sciences and so on. It's a fusion of the physical, the digital, and the biological world. That's Really, the essence of the 4th industrial revolution.
Speaker 7: Uh-huh. Wearables,
Speaker 18: The COVID 19 crisis has shown us that our old systems are not fit anymore for the 21st century. In short, we need a great reset.
Speaker 0: It'll be the State and its corporate partners, tightly convolved in exactly the way Mussolini imagined they should be. Right? And worldwide. Worldwide, global, global. So, look, I still identify as being on the left in as much as that means being anti war and and eager to, you know, strengthen the working class and reign in corporate power and save the planet and all that.
Okay? But I've learned from this and my mind is always open. I think I'm not the only one formerly on the left who now understands The crucial importance of freedom, you know, which I used to dismiss as a right wing thing. I no longer do. I think it was a mistake to take those freedoms for granted, right?
That's a precious thing. We can't survive without it, right? I also now appreciate the benefits of national sovereignty. Under a globalist system, you wanna live in a country that has its own laws and that protects its own people and is not subject to some one world system that's, you know, founded on the model of China today. I don't wanna live in China, and I don't wanna live on a planet that is planet China.
Okay? So I also appreciate the importance The second amendment, especially since I discovered a column that George Orwell wrote in the late thirties, a newspaper column, which it was about the possibility of a Nazi invasion of Britain. And he has a line, I'll probably butcher it, but, you know, that that right, that That gun on the wall of the working man's flat or the, you know, farmer's cottage is a symbol of freedom, he said. Okay? Well, George Orwell is somebody I greatly respect and I think he got it.
Okay? You know, authoritarian governments disarm their people, right, as China has done, naturally. Right? So I I think the second amendment is as absolute as the first. Right?
Joe Biden doesn't think the amendments were absolute. Right?
Speaker 9: No amendment. No amendment to the constitution is absolute.
Speaker 0: And I, Now understand the importance of the family, right? I think parents should have the right to determine what kind of medical procedures their children are going to be subjected to. I also understand the importance, some tenants of religion as well. And, I'm not as quick to dismiss all that as I I used to be. Right?
And this is someone who wrote a whole book, in part, on, the theocratic Christianism, you know, of some of the interests surrounding George W Bush. I don't think the danger lies there, you know. I think the danger lies in something entirely different.
@ContrarianTribe - Contrarian
If Media want to sell you an idea they bring in an “Expert”. These fake “Experts” are paid to add credibility to the narrative they are “creating”. Every University is filled with these “Narrative for Hire” clowns. What’s a good word to describe this practice?
@hodgetwins - Hodgetwins
People need to listen to Yuri Bezmenov. He was a KGB defector that explained how marxists brainwash people. Looking at where we’re at now, he was right
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the process of ideological subversion, which aims to change Americans' perception of reality so they cannot defend themselves or their country. This brainwashing process occurs over four stages: demoralization, where Marxist ideology is taught to generations of American students; destabilization, which focuses on the economy and defense systems; crisis, which brings about a violent change in power; and normalization, where false promises and a big brother government take control. The speaker warns that the United States is in a state of undeclared total war against its own principles, and unless the country wakes up, disaster is imminent.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The other 85% is a slow process, which we call either ideological subversion or active measures, in the language of the KGB or psychological warfare. What it basically means is to change the perception of reality of every American to such an extent that despite of the abundance of information, no one is able to come to sensible conclusions in the interests of defending themselves, their families, their community, and their country. It's a great brainwashing, process, which goes very slow, and it's divided in 4 basic stages. The first one being demoralization. It takes from 15 to 20 years to demoralize a nation.
Why that many years? Because this is the minimum number of years, which requires to, educate 1 generation of students in the country of of of your enemy exposed to the ideology of the enemy. In other words, Marxist Leninism ideology is being pumped into the soft heads of, of, of at least 3 generations of American students without being challenged or counterbalanced by the basic values of Americanism, American patriotism. The result, the result you can see, most of the people who graduated in sixties, dropouts, or half baked intellectuals are now occupying the positions of power in the government, civil service, business, mass media, educational system. You are stuck with them.
You cannot get rid of them. They are contaminated. They are programmed to think and react to certain stimuli in a certain pattern. You cannot change their mind even if you if you expose them to authentic information. Even if you prove that white is white and black is black, you still cannot change the basic perception and the logic of behavior.
In other words, these people, the process of demoralization is complete and irreversible. To get rid society of these people, you have you need another 20 or 15 years to educate a new generation of patriotically minded and and and, common common sense people who would be acting in favor and in the interest of the, of the United States society.
Speaker 1: And yet these people who've been programmed, and as you say, in place and who are favorable to An opening with the Soviet concept. These are the very people who would be marked for extermination in this country.
Speaker 0: Most of them, yes. Simply because the psychological shock when when they will see in future what the what the beautiful society of equality and social justice means in practice, obviously, they will revolt. They they they will, they they will be very unhappy, frustrated people. And the Marxist Leninist regime does not tolerate these people. They, obviously, they will join the links of dissenters dissidents.
Unlike in present United States, there will be no place for dissent in in future Marxist Leninist America. Here, you can you can get popular, like, Daniel Ellsberg, and filthy rich, like Jane Fonda for being dissident, for criticizing your Pentagon. In future, these people will be simply squashed like cockroaches. Nobody is going to pay them nothing for their beautiful, noble ideas of equality. This, they don't understand, and, it will be greatest shock for them, of course.
The demoralization process in the United States is basically completed already, for the last 25 years. Actually, it's overfulfilled because demoralization now reaches such areas where previously, not even Comrad von Drokhov and and all his experts would would even dream of such a tremendous success. Most of it is done by Americans to Americans, thanks to lack of moral standards. As I mentioned before, exposure to true information does not matter anymore. A person who was demoralized is unable to assess true information.
The facts tell nothing to him. Even if I shower him with information, with with authentic proof, with documents, with pictures. Even if I take him by force to the Soviet Union and show him concentration camp, he will refuse to believe it until he he's going to receive a kick in the in his fat bottom. When a military boot crashes his then he will understand, but not before that. That's the tragic of the situation of demoralization.
So, basically, America is stuck with with demoralization. And unless, Even if if you start right now here, this minute, you start educating new generation of Americans. It will still take you 15 to 20 years to turn the tide of, of ideological perception of reality, back to normal normalcy and and, patriotism. The next stage is destabilization. This time, subverter does not care about your ideas and the patterns of your consumption.
Whether you eat junk food and get fat and flab, it doesn't matter anymore. This time, and it takes only from 2 to 5 years to destabilize a nation. It's what what matters is essentials, economy, foreign relations, defense systems. And you can see it quite clearly that in some areas, in such sensitive areas as as, defense and economy, the influence of Marxist Leninist ideas in the United States is absolutely fantastic. I could never believe it 14 years ago when I landed, in this part of the world, that the process will go that fast.
The next stage, of course, is crisis. It it may take only up to 6 weeks to to bring a country to the verge of crisis. You can see it in Central America now. And after crisis with a violent change of power, structure and economy, you have so called the period of normalization. It may last indefinitely.
Normalization is a cynical expression borrowed from Soviet propaganda. When the Soviet tanks moved into Czechoslovakia in 68, comrade Brezhnev said, now the situation in brotherly Czechoslovakia is normalized. This is what will happen in the United States if you allow all the schmucks to bring the country to crisis, to promise people all kind of goodies and the paradise on earth, to to destabilize your economy, to eliminate the principle of free market competition and to put a big brother government in Washington DC with the benevolent dictators like Walter Mondale who will promise lots of thing, never mind whether the promises are fulfilled or not. He will go to Moscow to kiss the bottoms of of new generation of Soviet assassins. Never mind.
He will create false illusions that the situation is under control. Situation is not under control. Situation is disgustingly out of control. Most of the American politicians, media, and educational system trains another generation of people who think they are living at the peacetime, falls. United States is in the state of war, undeclared total war against the basic principles, and the foundations of of this system.
And and the initiator of this war is not Comrade Dondropov, of course. It's it's the system. However ridiculous it may sound, the world communist system or the world communist conspiracy. Whether I scare some people or not, I don't give a hoot. If if you are not scared by now, Nothing can scare you.
But you don't have to be paranoid about it. What what actually happens now that unlike myself, you have literally several years to live on unless United States wake up. That the time bomb is ticking. With every 2nd, the disaster is coming closer and closer. Unlike myself, you will have nowhere to defect to, unless you want to live in nontactical opinions.
This is it. This is the last country of freedom and and possibility.
reSee.it AI Summary
Propaganda media manufactures consent for wars by distorting truth, oversimplifying issues, and demonizing targets. Conflict benefits those who fund both sides, not the people. Mainstream media sets boundaries and frames narratives, as seen with COVID-19. Populations must be fooled into wars. Question information presented. Watch the documentary "All Wars Are Bankers' Wars" for insight. Should we consider a world without mainstream media?
@gunthertree2 - Blake 🔮
Watch: Critical Thought: Populations Don’t Like Wars: They Must Be Fooled Into Them: Who Really Benefits? With ongoing war escalation, its important to consider how propaganda media manufactures consent for wars by telling half truths, deliberately leaving out context, oversimplification of an issue, dehumanizing the intended target, demonizing leaders/groups & constantly parroting state department propaganda slogans. Conflict is a tool for powers above it who fund both sides to advance broader agendas that are not for the benefit of the people. Globalists feed on division & hate. What you see from dying mainstream media sets boundaries and frames the narratives for society to blindly follow (think COVID-19). Populations don’t like wars. They have to be fooled into wars. Recognize that its the globalist groups/elitists vs. the people. People should question and think critically about the information presented to them. Recently, @Inversionism shared an important documentary that offers powerful insight on how “all wars are bankers’ wars”. I will link it below this post. This raises the question; would the world be a better place without the mainstream media altogether?
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker believes that media lies have been responsible for starting most wars in the past 50 years. They argue that if the media had dug deeper and not spread government propaganda, wars could have been prevented. The speaker suggests that populations are tricked into wars because they don't willingly enter them. They claim that a good media environment leads to peace, but ignorance is the main enemy. The organizations promoting ignorance are those that keep secrets and distort information. The speaker expresses their opinion that the media is generally so bad that the world might be better off without it.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Nearly every war that has started in the past 50 years has been a result of media lives the media could have stopped it if they had searched deep enough, they hadn't, reprinted government propaganda, they could have stopped it. But what does that in. Well, that means basically populations don't like wars, and populations have to being fooled into wars, populations don't willingly and with open eyes go into a war, so if we have a good media environment, then you also have a peaceful environment, but our number one enemy is ignorance. Now question is who is promoting ignorance well those organizations who try to keep them secret scrutiny, and those organizations which distort true information, connection, false, misrepresentation. In this latter category, it is bad news.
It really is my opinion the immediate, in general, are so bad, we we have to question whether the world wouldn't be better off without
reSee.it AI Summary
In a revealing interview, CIA Officer Frank Sepp exposes the practice of planting false information in major newspapers. This targeted propaganda aims to manipulate public opinion, manufacture consent for wars, and control narratives. By omitting context, oversimplifying issues, and demonizing leaders, the media becomes a tool for spreading state department propaganda. Operation Mockingbird, a notorious CIA program, continues to influence media today. Watch the clip for eye-opening insights.
@_BlakeHabyan - Blake
Must Watch: Exposing Targeted Propaganda: CIA Officer Frank Sepp Discusses Planting Stories In Major Newspapers: In 1983, Frank Snepp casually discussed the CIA’s practice of ‘planting’ false information in the media. Note that those who push the CIA stories are unable to “fact check” them, just like the fact checkers are not able to fact check stories. Propaganda media is used to manufacture consent for wars & conflict by telling half truths, deliberately leaving out context, oversimplification of an issue, dehumanizing the intended target, demonizing leaders/groups & constantly parroting state department propaganda slogans. This is what creates boundaries for the approved narratives that society blindly follows. Operation Mockingbird is alive and well today. Bookmark this clip for later or play on 1.25x speed if you’re short on time.
Video Transcript AI Summary
During my time at the CIA, I was responsible for briefing the press and circulating disinformation. Disinformation is not necessarily a lie, but rather a half truth. We would select influential journalists and provide them with information that we wanted to convey to the American public. We targeted respected journalists like Robert Chaplin, Kais Beach, Bud Merrick, Malcolm Brown, and Maynard Parker. I would cultivate their trust by sharing valid information and then slip in the data we wanted to spread, which may not have been true. We would also create an environment where journalists couldn't fact-check by briefing diplomats who would confirm our false information. Personally, I am opposed to these disinformation activities as they serve no useful purpose for the CIA.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You briefed the press, did you not, when you were there? Well, I had several jobs. One of my jobs was that of and indeed brief the press when we, the CIA, wanted to, circulate disinformation on a particular issue. Disinformation is not necessarily not necessarily a lie. It may be a half truth.
And, we would pick out a journalist. I would go do the briefing and hope that he would put the information in print. For instance, if we wanted to get, across to the American public, that the North Vietnamese were building up their force structure in South Vietnam, I would go to a journalist and advise him that in the past, 6 months, x number of North Vietnamese forces had come down the Ho Chi Minh Trail System them through Southern Laos. So either he goes with the information or he doesn't, and ordinarily or usually the journalists would go with it because it was it looked like some kind of exclusive. And I would say our percentage planning that kind of data was 70 to 80%.
The correspondence we targeted were those who had terrific influence, the most respected journalists in Saigon, like Robert Chaplin of the New Yorker Magazine, Kais Beach, of the Los Angeles Times from time to time, and also he worked for the Chicago Daily News, Bud Merrick of US News and World Report, Malcolm Brown of The New York Times, even Maynard Parker of Newsweek Magazine. We would go after these gentlemen. I would be directed to cultivate them, to spend time with them at, to the Caravel Hotel or the Continental Hotel to socialize with them and and slowly but surely to try to gain their confidence by doppling out, valid information, information which was true. And then I would drop in into a conversation the data that we wanted to get across, which might not be true. One piece of data, for instance, that we managed to plan in the New Yorker magazine had to do with a a supposed North Vietnamese effort in 1973 to develop airfields along the border of South Vietnam.
The reason we wanted to plant this information was that we were trying to persuade the US Congress that Saigon should be continued to should continue to get a great deal of aid, and that the North Vietnamese were the chief violators of the ceasefire accord. That was printed in the New Yorker magazine under the byline of Robert Chaplin, as indeed was a great deal of such information which which we're trying to circulate. If I planted a piece of information with a reporter, I would ordinarily then try to create an environment in which he could not check the information. I would go to the British ambassador and brief him on the disinformation I had just given the reporter. So when the reporter wanted to cross check what I told him with, say, the British ambassador, New Zealand ambassador, or what have you.
He would get false confirmation, the same message coming back at him, and he'd say, I've got proof that Frank Snapp told me the truth, when in fact, what he'd gotten was simply an echo of what, I'd given him in in the 1st place via a British ambassador or other of our friendly diplomatic contacts. I am as an ex CIA agent opposed to the disinformation activities, in which I was involved. I admit that I was involved, and I think it, served no useful purpose, propagandizing the American, public or congress is not the CIA's job.
reSee.it AI Summary
In 2013, the United States repealed its propaganda ban, allowing the government to spread its news to Americans. This nullified the Smith-Mundt Act of 1948, which prohibited influencing public opinion. In 2020, the government used the media to create fear during COVID. A docuseries called Propaganda Exposed explores this issue. Sign up for free access starting November 1st. Learn more here.
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
"In 2013, it was legalized in the United States to propagandize its citizens." A closer look at the Smith-Mundt Modernization Act: In 2013, under Obama, the United States repealed its propaganda ban, which allowed the Government to spread its government-made news to Americans. For decades, the anti-propaganda law prevented the U.S. government’s mammoth broadcasting arm from delivering programming to American audiences. The result: an unleashing of thousands of hours per week of government-funded radio and TV programs for domestic U.S. consumption. The reform effectively nullified the Smith-Mundt Act of 1948, which was amended in 1985 SPECIFICALLY to prohibit U.S. organizations from using information to influence public opinion in the United States. Then in 2020, during COVID, the government weaponized the media against its own citizens in the greatest psychological fear campaign in human history. The above clip is from a new docuseries called Propaganda Exposed. Click the link below to obtain free access to the series on November 1. SIGN UP HERE: http://propaganda-exposed.com
Video Transcript AI Summary
In 2013, the United States legalized propaganda, allowing false narratives to be presented as factual news. The Smith Modernization Act repealed the 1948 Smith Munt Act, which previously prohibited the release of propaganda in America. This change made it easier to manipulate and deceive the American public. The act was signed into law by Obama, giving propaganda a reboot. Now, scripted and orchestrated propaganda can be propagated as factual news to the citizens. This legalization raises concerns about the erosion of freedoms and the potential for government manipulation.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So in 2013, it was legalized in the United States to propagandize its citizens. What? Like, that's some scary third world stuff going on. That's the kind of stuff that people use to topple governments to take away freedoms.
Speaker 1: Yes. You heard that right. Almost a decade ago, Propaganda was legalized in the United States with the passage of the Smith The Smith Munt Modernization Act was buried in the 2012 National Defense Authorization Act for a good reason, because it repealed the 1948 Smith Munt Act, which authorized the State Department and the mainstream media to engage in propagandizing foreign countries, but it prohibited releasing that Same propaganda in America for public consumption. This prohibition was lifted when the Smith Modernization Act was signed into law by Obama. Very simply, Obama gave it a reboot in 2012.
So no matter how outrageous The propaganda may be it's completely legal. Propaganda, in other words, a false narrative for whatever specific Purpose, is now much much easier to perpetrate on the people. Due to the Smith Modernization Act, which went into effect on July 2, 2013. Scripted and orchestrated propaganda can now be presented to the American public as factual news.
Propaganda EXPOSED! [UNCENSORED] Starts Nov 1
The Truth About Health Freedom & Big Pharma
go.propaganda-exposed.com
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
The 9-part docuseries starts November 1st. Click the link below to learn more: https://propaganda-exposed.com
Propaganda EXPOSED! [UNCENSORED] Starts Nov 1
The Truth About Health Freedom & Big Pharma
go.propaganda-exposed.com
@PunishDem1776 - The Punisher
Hollywoodism 🚨Full Documentary🚨 The ultimate tool of Propaganda Who controls Hollywood? https://t.co/gdTELzuDCF
Video Transcript AI Summary
This video tells the story of Jewish immigrants who founded Hollywood and shaped American cinema. Men like Harry Warner, Samuel Goldwyn, and Louis B. Mayer came from Eastern Europe, seeking a better life and establishing movie studios. Through their films, they presented a mythical America where families were strong, the little guy could succeed, and everyone had a chance at the American dream. They celebrated American values and patriotism, transforming themselves from outsiders to award-winning American producers. However, during World War II, they faced challenges and made patriotic war movies to support the American army. The House Un-American Activities Committee targeted Hollywood for its perceived communist influence, leading to a blacklist of talent. The moguls lost control of the industry and faced decline, shattering their dream of acceptance and success in America.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: These images conceal memories. Beneath Hollywood's familiar stories lies a hidden history of persecution and murder, which haunted a small group of men. Not American cowboys, but Jewish immigrants. This is the story of the founders of Hollywood. The story of the idea that became their America and ours.
Speaker 1: What is America to me? A name, a map, or a flag I A certain word. Democracy. What is America to me?
Speaker 0: Modern America first saw light on a Hollywood screen. It was largely the product of 6 movie studios established in the 19 twenties and run for over 30 years by a group of Jewish immigrants. They had strikingly similar backgrounds.
Speaker 1: All races and religion. That's America.
Speaker 2: All of these men who founded Hollywood were born within a 500 mile radius of one another, and all of them wound up roughly within 15 miles of one another in Los Angeles. One could say that the American dream was really born in Eastern Europe.
Speaker 3: Well, here we are. This is the Warner studio.
Speaker 4: Gee, I've never been so thrilled in all my
Speaker 0: Harry Warner, who with 3 of his brothers brought sound to the motion picture, was born in Poland.
Speaker 3: Comes Jack Warner, youngest of the Warner And then the senior member of the Phil Baines brothers
Speaker 0: Also from Poland was Samuel Goldwyn, born Goldfish. Although Goldwyn never ran a major studio, he was perhaps the biggest and best known of the independent Hollywood producers. Universal founder, Carl came from a small town in Germany. Louis b Mayer, who gave us the glory years of the MGM studio, was born in a Russian Jewish village. William Fox and Paramount's Edel Zuker were both born in Hungary.
Fox's studio merged with 20th century pictures to form 20th century Zukor, known as the father of the feature length film, spent his childhood in this Jewish village. Prior to the 20th century, most Eastern European Jews were forced to live in poor villages called. Without a homeland, they lived a marginal existence at the sufferance of the Russian
Speaker 5: czar. Rabbi, may I ask you a question? Certainly, Leibish. Is there a proper blessing For the tsar? A blessing for the tsar, of course.
May God bless and keep the tsar Far away from us.
Speaker 0: In these villages, religion and life were intertwined. Everyone spoke Yiddish, the Germanic language of the. These towns were alive with Yiddish songs, storytelling, theater, and humor that would eventually find their way to America. This rich cultural life insulated the shtetl Jews from their misery and the often hostile reality around them.
Speaker 6: The Hollywood movie moguls And their parents came from a place which is like a colossal pressure cooker. The Pale of Settlement in the Russian Empire Was the only place where Jews could live legally under the czar? They had a very marginal existence, lived in poor villages. There was a tremendous degree of overpopulation. People were constantly migrating around this, this area.
It really was the equivalent of a sort of huge Indian reservation. Not only were people poor, but there were very few things that they could do to earn a livelihood. Their neighbors were often, violent. There were tremendous constraints on Jewish life and also a real sense of vulnerability. Without warning,
Speaker 0: death could come crashing down among the defenseless stetls, reminding the Jews that as a people, they were permanent outsiders, vulnerable, and powerless. Before the turn of the century, hundreds of thousands died in Pope Romans, massacres of Jews.
Speaker 7: Suddenly, neighbors kept running out of the front of their house yelling, The hooligans are here. They broke down the date and they came in on horseback on foot wielding swords. And my oldest brother And my father each grabbed one of those clubs and they went out swinging. Fortunately, they came back, but there are few people killed. This was the pogrom, And I lived through it.
Speaker 0: This is where the founders of Hollywood came from. This is what they were fleeing and Again and again, images of the rampaging oppressor, of the slaughter of the innocent, and of homes laid waste by fire make their way into American movies. For the shtetl Jews in the late 1800, life was a series of rapes and murders. Many he decided not to wait for a cavalry that would never come.
Speaker 8: For the Jews of Eastern Europe, there were 3 ways to flee. The first was to stay where you were and participate in some Marxist or socialist movement where you could become part of a labor organization that would, in turn, create a great regime, a socialist regime, in which Jews could be accepted as A very small minority began to dream about Palestine. Very small numbers of people became Zionist, you needed a great deal of ideological dexterity to talk yourself into getting on a boat and going to Palestine at The turn of the century. The vast majority of Jews, 2,000,000 out of two and a half 1000000 who left Eastern Europe to find their dream went to America. The smart money was on America.
It was the Simple place where you could imagine the dream of Jews having both opportunity for Tolerance and also economic security.
Speaker 9: For Jews, this was a migration forever. They had no positive views of, life in the old world. Many immigrants, in fact, talked about the last moment in Russia where they turn around and spit. In a way, we might even say that they actually became American They began the process of Americanization at the moment when they decided to leave because they knew that there was no going
Speaker 5: back. Among
Speaker 0: these immigrants were the future founders of the studios. They came little money and few belongings, but they brought with them a new vision of America. Hollywood was a dream dreamt When they landed in America, the Jews expected to find a place where the little guy could make it to the Instead, they found a Protestant elite whose mission was to educate the immigrants and keep them in their place.
Speaker 8: The dream with which the Jews came to America was very quickly frustrated. They couldn't get into financial services, They could work for slave wages. They couldn't live in the good neighborhoods. They could live in tenement slums. And It didn't take long before a great number of them began to once again fantasize about what it would really mean to realize the original dream.
Speaker 0: Many of the Future moguls had fathers who failed to adjust in the new world. At a very early age, they became the family breadwinners. They developed an unrelenting desire to make to succeed in the America that existed somewhere beyond the Jewish ghettos.
Speaker 10: Jews couldn't be in banking. They were shut out of that. There were quota systems to get The Harvard and almost any medical school or whatever, any business or profession that was thought to be honorable was in some way or other excluded to Jews. So that, they went into businesses that were, in a sense, outside of this System of dominance.
Speaker 0: Hollywood's future founders quickly distinguished themselves as risk and innovators. Adolf Zukor made his first fortune with the invention of a fox stole with a clasp inside the fox's mouth.
Speaker 11: The first moguls tended to come from various aspects of the sales of business. Dry goods sales, Lemley was a clothier, Goldwyn was a glove salesman, And Adolph Zukor infers, Louis sells Nick in the diamond business. And as they approached the motion picture industry, they approached it Not from, an engineering point of view, not from technology or machinery, but from how they can distribute a product.
Speaker 6: You really can't stress too much how pervasively Jewish the movie industry was in New York before World War one. Not that the Jews were, were making movies or acting in movies, but There probably would not have been a, an extended Jewish family in New York at that time who did not have some relatives involved in some aspect of the movie industry, which was really a mom and pop industry of storefront theaters in not very elegant neighborhoods.
Speaker 12: My dad was president of Paramount for Almost 30 years. The way you got into the business was quite wonderful. My grandmother, who raised 8 children In 2 rooms above a fish and produce market in, a Jewish ghetto in Chicago called Maxwell Street. She came rushing and said, Bonnie, Bonnie, you have to come here quickly. I have the most wonderful business and she was going on and on and on and she got him on a trolley car and took him to a kind of storefront Nickelodeon theater.
And on the way there, she told him that this was the greatest business in the world because the people paid the money before they got the goods.
Speaker 13: Sam ran the projector, and Abe fed the film through through it. Harry collected the money, and Jack's assignment he was see, Jack was only, like, 13, 12 or 13 at the time, but he was he was singing. He had a nickname, Leon Zuardo. That's what he named himself. I don't ask for you how.
Anyway, so he he was used to chase the audience out of the, theater after the show was over because a lot of times they'd want to stay.
Speaker 0: At the turn of the century, movies reflected the vision of America shared by Thomas Edison and the other men who invented the film industry. Most of these old start protestants saw film as an amusement for the working classes. The films presented negative images of hook nose Jews, blacks, and others. They championed an
Speaker 10: Take 1 movie. Just 1 movie. Biographs, the fights of nations. The Jews meet on the street, and a policeman comes up to run off one of them who's peddling neckties. 1 of the other Jews pulls out money and hands it to the policeman as a bribe to let his friends sell the neckties.
There is a thread Red connected to the money. So as the cop walks away smugly, the money pops out of his pocket back into the Jew's They're petty merchants. They jabber, and they corrupt cops. It's all so perfect. The blacks, they're in a saloon, and a fight ensues in which a huge razor is pulled.
So the blacks dance, they fight over women, and they fight with razors. Then 2 Scotsmen Fight nobly with courage and dignity. Then it cuts to the end, and the ethnic groups that are Thought to be noble come out into a kind of tableau. John Bull comes out and shakes hands with everybody. Johnny Ribb From the confederacy comes out and takes a bow.
The Scotsman comes out and takes a bow. And finally, uncle Sam comes out and takes a bow. No Jews, no blacks. In effect, immigration has happened. But until the immigrants and the blacks learn what it's It's like to be old stock.
They're not really in it yet.
Speaker 0: The highest artistic achievement of pre Jewish American cinema was the box office hit Birth of a Nation by D. W. Griffith. The explicitly racist story glorified Klan and played on white America's fear of racial intermixing. These films reflected popular American values of their era.
Ironically, they were being shown in Jewish run theaters to audiences of Jews and other immigrants. Independently of each other, The Warner Brothers, Zucker, Goldwyn, Lasky and Laemmle began exhibiting the short films produced by the Edison men. They upgraded their theaters and sought ways to attract the middle class. Here, they drew on their Jewish experience.
Speaker 14: The Jewish tradition has placed an enormous value on high culture, on learning and the finest expressions of music and Experience of being on the margins meant that your identity was integrated tied to the maintenance of popular culture, Collective norms at the lowest common denominator and that combination of a commitment to high culture on the one hand And an appreciation of low culture or popular culture on the other was the perfect preparation. Adolf Zucker Turning to to a Sarah Bernhardt for a a popular film, I think, is a case in point.
Speaker 0: Adolf Zucker believed that to attract the middle class, one had to change not just the theaters, but the films. Bypassing Edison, he imported from This film featuring a famous stage actress, he premiered it in a Broadway theater. Not wanting to depend on Europeans for quality films, Carl Laemmle and the other Jewish exhibitors began producing their own films.
Speaker 4: Open your eyes.
Speaker 0: Edison decided that the Jews had overstepped their bounds. To shut them out in 190 Right? He organized a producer's trust that declared a monopoly on film production in America. 7 years later, Edison's trust would lose its monopoly in the courts. But in 1912, to escape Edison and the goons he sent to enforce control of the industry.
The future moguls headed west to the orange groves of California. Here, they found immediate success.
Speaker 2: Now why did they move to California? I believe that they went there because California was a raw social environment, and although there was a social system in place, It was nowhere near as sophisticated and nowhere near as entrenched as the social hierarchy in Boston or New York or even Chicago where these moguls came from. So coming to California, they realized that they could create their own social environment. They could create an empire of their own, not only on screen, but within their own lives, in their own social environment, and that's precisely what they did.
Speaker 11: In 1915, Carl Laemmle had decided to open a very large Plant in the valley north of, Hollywood, which they called Universal City, and they got themselves a postal designation for Universal City with its own mayor and its own police force, a a gigantic facility that includes all necessities for designing films, Building sets, photographing them, editing them, costuming them, writing the scripts, housing the executives, all under 1 piece of property, which which he would people with his relatives very famously brought over from
Speaker 15: in the world. Among the
Speaker 3: movie industry's 30,000 employees are men and women from nearly three 100 trades of professionals.
Speaker 0: Following Laemmle by 1920, Harry Cohn, Zukor, Goldwyn, Fox, and Mayer had set up their own studios, golden stetels, where each was clearly in charge.
Speaker 5: Show me what you are made of. If you have the slightest doubt, be man enough to step aside And let the go getters go ahead. I will not have quitters or lazy men Working for Universal. That's straight from the shoulder, isn't it?
Speaker 16: They were tough. They had to be tough. They came up from the ghettos, most of them. They had to survive in a business that was cutthroat. And, if they didn't cut throats first, their own would be done.
So only the tough survived, and these guys were Ruthless. They used women. They treated stars, brutally sometimes. But they had redeeming qualities, too. I mean, they were sentimental.
My god. Louis Vemaire would cry at the drop of a handkerchief. And they were most of all showmen, And they love movies. They live for movies. And that's, a greatness that, does not exist today.
Speaker 17: I'd been here about a week on the lot in 1937, and Adolph Zuker, who was head of Paramount, sent me to Columbia to deliver a message to Harry Cohen who was the head of Columbia Pictures. And he's sitting at his desk which is elevated about 6 inches off the floor. And he's on the phone, other hand extended. He's getting a manicure. A A barber's cutting his hair, and he's getting his shoeshine.
Now that's something you're going to see, a man on the phone, head of a studio, manicure, shoeshine and a haircut all at the same time. And I said, man, this is Hollywood.
Speaker 18: Let me, Adam.
Speaker 5: How the hell are you?
Speaker 19: Good Tripp. My name is Jack Lipnick. I run this stump, and I'm from New York myself. Mince, if you want to go all the way back. The writer is king here at Capital Pictures.
You don't believe me? Take a look at your paycheck at the end of every week. That's what we think of the writer. So what kind of pictures does he like? Mister Fink hasn't given a preference, mister Lipnick.
So how about it, Bart?
Speaker 10: Well, To be honest, I I I don't know the the picture is much, mister Lipnick.
Speaker 19: That's okay. That's okay. That's okay. That's just fine. You probably walked in here thinking that was gonna be a handicap, that we wanted people who knew something about the media.
Maybe even thinking there was all kinds of technical mumbo jumbo to learn. You were dead wrong. We're only interested in one thing. Can you tell a story, Bart? Can you make us laugh?
Can you make us cry? Can you make us wanna break out? Enjoy a song. Is that more to one thing? Okay.
The point is I run this dump, and I don't order to take care of mumbo jumbo. Why do I run it? It's like a horse sense, goddamn it. Showmanship. And, also, I hope I told you this.
I am bigger and meaner and louder than any other kite in this country. Just tell him that, Luke. And I don't mean my dick is bigger than yours. It's not a sexual thing. I'll tell you're a writer.
You'll know more about that.
Speaker 16: Jack Warner, who's considered a primitive, told terrible jokes, And yet that studio produced a legacy of tremendous films from The Jazz Singer to Casablanca to My Fair Lady, so he must have been doing something right.
Speaker 2: There's a very romantic notion That Hollywood movies were made by artists. The director and the writer and, to a certain extent, the stars actually made these movies. Those were the real artists, these guys were only businessmen, I would place the artistic sensibility not with the director, but with the studio head, and for those who say, well this is ridiculous. I would say, From beginning to end, the executive had the primary input into the picture And supervised every aspect of production over and above the fact that beyond any individual picture, It was the executive who created the entire studio apparatus. Every producer who worked there, every director who worked there, Every writer who worked there, and every star who worked there, was part of the larger system that was created by The Hollywood Jews.
Speaker 20: I'm not sure that there was an, quote, American dream before the Jews came to Hollywood And, invented it. What you had was a westward movement, and you had the idea of freedom, But you didn't have, what we have today, which is a popular culture that Creates, dreams. That's a dream factory.
Speaker 0: Once the studios were in place, The Jewish moguls produced hundreds of feature length films each year. Movies that presented America with a new vision of itself. A vision that was very different from that of the establishment filmmakers of the Edison Trust.
Speaker 4: Be optimistic. Go to be a foreigner. Right now that corner and smile. Don't wear a long face, kiss Never in style. Be optimistic and smile.
Speaker 12: They got to put their hopes and aspirations and Mythologies about what a perfect life would be like, which is something I think people probably spend a long time thinking about when they have a very imperfect life with a great deal of Persecution, disempowerment. You know, what would the system be if we could make it up and show it to you?
Speaker 2: I wanna make that come to life for every boy in this land. Yes. And all to light it up like that too. You see You see, boys forget what their country means by just reading the land of the free in history books. When they get to
Speaker 3: be men, they forget even more.
Speaker 2: Liberty is too precious a thing to be buried in books,
Speaker 5: miss Saunders.
Speaker 3: Men should hold it up in front of them every single day of their lives and say, I'm free To think and to speak. My ancestors couldn't. I can.
Speaker 15: And my children will.
Speaker 0: The Jewish determination to survive was repackaged as the will of all common people to go on.
Speaker 15: We sure taken a beating.
Speaker 21: I know.
Speaker 22: That's what makes us rich fellas come up and they die, and their kids ain't no good and they die out. But we keep We're the people that live. They can't wipe us out. They can't lick us. We'll go on forever, pa, because we're the people.
Speaker 0: Unlike Edison, is the working class while extolling middle class values.
Speaker 4: It's Sandy Hardy.
Speaker 1: Woo hoo. What's
Speaker 3: What's this all about?
Speaker 0: The moguls created a fantasy version of their own lives. They created an America were families were strong. The flight from persecution had destroyed their own families. The movies showed the family as indomitable and treated mothers with reverence. The immigrant Jews News also appealed to the aspirations of youth, another group of perennial outsiders forced to prove itself.
Speaker 5: George Washington was just a kid when he chopped down that tree. But if they'd locked was just
Speaker 4: a kid when he chopped down
Speaker 5: that tree. But if they locked him up for that, where'd this country be?
Speaker 3: They call us
Speaker 0: Theirs was a mythical America. A world of boundless optimism, happy endings, and homespun truths. This was a world of clapboard houses with broad verandas and white picket fences, gleaming streets and shops with friendly picture windows. Hollywood's America was made up of citizens who were industrious, Religious, wholesome, and decent. And although they were of different classes and ethnicities, they were knitted together by a larger, almost spiritual sense It's a family.
The Moguls created the images, the icons, and the visual forms that we identify with the American way of life.
Speaker 2: They created their own America, an America which is not the real America, it's their own version of the real America, but ultimately, This shadow America becomes so popular and so widely disseminated that its images and its values Come to devour the real America. And so the, the grand irony of all of Hollywood is that Americans Come to define themselves by the shadow America that was created by Eastern European Jewish immigrants Who weren't admitted to the precincts of the real America.
Speaker 5: Somewhere
Speaker 4: over the rainbow Where the clouds are far behind Where troubles melt like lemon drops away above the chimney tops. That's where you
Speaker 0: In the 19 twenties and thirties, movie houses became temples of the new Hollywood religion. Jewish values made kitsch. 75% of all Americans went to the movies at least once a week.
Speaker 23: This kind of movie going was religious because it had to do with worship. It had to do with the screen being larger than you were, and you being in awe of what you were looking at and feeling a certain reverence for it. And so there was, maybe you could say, a bogus spirituality, but it was a spirituality still that was believed in.
Speaker 3: Star Norma Shearer, legendary producer Irving Thalberg and the most famous of screen lovers, Greta Garbo and John Gilbert. And
Speaker 5: here
Speaker 0: Actors became the gods and goddesses of the new American religion.
Speaker 3: Mom. It's frenzied friendship, frantic fandom. Here she comes, the star.
Speaker 0: And where there are new gods, There must be new idols. So the studio heads began a movie guild with a lofty title of the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences. It was Mayer's brilliant idea to create the Oscars, where the movie moguls could honour themselves by giving each other awards. In this way, they went from being a group of immigrant Jews to award winning American producers.
Speaker 3: Thank you, mister Jessel. I'm proud to be the recipient of this award. I'm proud to be the head of a studio.
Speaker 0: In their own lives, the Hollywood Jews subscribed to the religion of their own making. They were the quintessential little guys who had made it to the top. They threw parties on their yachts. They dressed in tailor made suits. They lived in the kind of houses that aristocrats were supposed to live in.
And when they were not admitted To the Gentile country clubs, they rebuilt this one, Hillcrest, bigger and better than all the rest.
Speaker 15: Are you married? No.
Speaker 0: Many of the Mughals divorced their Jewish first wives and married Younger, more socially acceptable women.
Speaker 24: The Whole notion that Hollywood pins itself on is intermarriage, the whole idea of inter ethnic romance. Now why do they do that? First of all, because love is a Very democratic ideal. It knows no borders. It knows not riches.
It knows not tradition. It knows simply the matters of the heart. In addition to that, When a Jew can marry a non Jew, particularly part of the establishment culture, that's really a wonderful indication Of how far up into society Jews have come.
Speaker 25: This is where a producer lives. Not just any producer, but one of the most famous of them all. Samuel Goldwyn, high up on one of Beverly's hills.
Speaker 4: Good morning.
Speaker 25: Well, here is mister and missus Samuel Goldwyn. And do you mind if I call you Francis?
Speaker 4: Thank you very much.
Speaker 25: Sam, I understand that while you're the boss in the studio that there's,
Speaker 3: another This
Speaker 25: is the boss here. It's her house, isn't it? Every bit of it. Let's talk to Frances then.
Speaker 15: How long
Speaker 25: have you lived here?
Speaker 4: Oh, it's so long. 25, 26
Speaker 25: Sam, how'd you happen to pick this hilltop site out? Because of the view? She picked it out. And you bought it? She liked it.
The idea is to have her like it. It's all that's necessary for me. It's it's fun to live in Beverly, isn't it? We like Beverly very much. And we'd allotted your host citizens of our town.
Speaker 6: When Jews came to America, it wasn't only mayflower wasps who seemed to embody America to American blacks were quintessential Americans. I mean, that was one of the things that made America, America, the the the presence of, of of black people. And, the the indigenous African American culture was of, tremendous interest. I mean, the music, the dancing, the popular styles, and so on.
Speaker 0: The Hollywood Jews may have wanted to marry into white America. But when it came to music, Jewish composers looked to black America. Harold the son of a liturgical singer or cantor became one of the foremost popularizers of the blues.
Speaker 9: Served as messengers, in essence, of black culture. They took it, they consumed it, they integrated into their own cultural repertoire and then introduced it to white America that was, essentially willing to listen to Jews and, to, partake of what Jews had to offer in way that they never would from blacks.
Speaker 0: 1st on Broadway and later in the Hollywood musical, this was the way Jewish music often Insounded. In writing lyrics, They turned to their Jewish immigrant concerns of people needing to belong somewhere, needing some kind of Redemption through America. The Jews took these themes, but instead of putting them to Jewish music, they borrowed forms that they saw as authentically American. In a sense, they wrote music in blackface.
Speaker 3: Told him through
Speaker 0: From the beginning, though They indulged in stereotypes. The Hollywood moguls took a different view of African Americans than that of the pre Jewish filmmakers. Birth of a Nation had played the white fear of the mixing of the races. In dramatic contrast in the film showboat, the white male lead Literally internalizes the blood of his black wife.
Speaker 3: What are you doing with that knife? I'm not going to fritter, you fool. Lead me be. I know what I'm doing.
Speaker 0: The Hollywood Jews wanted to be accepted as Americans. Their films advocated not just for Jews, but for everyone. They believe that if you were prepared to pay the price and shed your identity, then America should be prepared to accept you.
Speaker 3: And I have an unpleasant duty. I understand that you have a miscegenation case on board.
Speaker 4: What do you mean, ma'am?
Speaker 3: How's that? A case of a Negro woman married to a white man. A criminal offense in this state. No. No such thing on board this boat.
The name of the white man is Steve Baker. The name of the niggers. The name of the niggers is Julie Dozier. You Well, I got more than a drop of Negro blood in me, and that's a fact. With the trouble, man.
Speaker 0: In Hollywood, Jews trying to pass as gentiles made films about blacks passing as whites. In Pinky, we see just how precarious that strategy is. For the Outsider, things can turn in an instant.
Speaker 3: About her, ma'am. Now she even so much as thought of threatening you, we wanna know about it. Or she give you any of her impudence. Shut up, girl.
Speaker 4: Oh, excuse me, sir. But why are you 2 white men, ma'am, and hush? She's nothing but a low down color gal. Tried to steal my leg. Get that money.
Can't do that.
Speaker 3: You heard what she said. He's got to slap her down. Unless it's true.
Speaker 4: Yes. It's Plue. I'm calling. Yeah. My grandmother is missus Dicey Johnson.
Speaker 5: Missus Dicey Johnson. Slap them both down
Speaker 3: cheap. Hold
Speaker 5: I'll be going now.
Speaker 3: Go. You ain't going anywhere till I said. You're getting that car.
Speaker 4: You mean I'm under arrest?
Speaker 3: What do you think?
Speaker 4: On what charges are you holding?
Speaker 3: You heard what I said getting that car.
Speaker 18: One of
Speaker 2: the things that made American films so exportable Is that anyone anywhere could identify with so many of the themes of American movies, one of which was the idea of the outsider, Which was a Jewish thing. Jews being outsiders, making films about outsiders. You see this even in monster pictures. In King Kong, there is a film about, you know, an outsider, and yet it's the monster, if you wanna call King Kong that, with whom the audience sympathizes.
Speaker 0: In Hollywood, every outsider could be transformed into an insider. Even in Karl Laemmle was an outsider. He resembled an elf. Not surprisingly, Universal's films often championed marginal beings who were persecuted like the Jews of Europe. At Warner Brothers, the Jewish sensibility expressed itself by an identification with the little guy, the prizefighters and the losers, the loners, and the gangsters.
At Harry Cohn's Columbia, the emphasis was not on the outsider, but on the common man. Here, the Street smart Clark Gable lectures the upper classes, represented by Claudette Colbert.
Speaker 3: You're in a jam and all you can think of is your money. It never fails, does it? Ever hear of the word humility?
Speaker 15: No. You wouldn't. I guess
Speaker 3: it never occurred to you to just say, please, mister Eiffel, will you help me? Now
Speaker 5: let it
Speaker 3: bring you down off your high horse for a minute. But let me tell you something. Maybe it'll take a load off your mind. You don't have to worry about me. I'm not interested in your money or your problem.
You, King Wesley, your father? You're all a lot of hooey to me.
Speaker 0: Zucker's Paramount didn't put down the Instead, the studio whisked audiences into a once inaccessible universe of sophistication and luxury. When it came to class for the masses, nobody outdid Louis Bemaire's MGM. Everything glittered with quality and style, reflecting the vision of the man at the helm.
Speaker 21: Mister Maynard was very persuasive. It's about the only word I could use. And so he's standing there and he watched what was going on and he'd say, no, just wait a minute. Stop that, he says. That's not the way to do it.
I'll show you how it should be And he'd really go through this thing very well. It was everybody and they never knew when he was gonna walk in on them. They were very very leery of them, the directors, because they never knew when Louis was gonna walk down there and say, no, that's not the way I want it. See, he was a perfectionist. He knew what he wanted, and money was no object.
At Metro Boulevard, Price bets nothing if it's to be the best.
Speaker 0: In creating the great movie musical, Hollywood adapted the Broadway musical, an original American art form almost wholly created by fellow immigrant Jews. The music and lyrics were often based on classic stories, from a Jewish perspective. Not made the ground of people.
Speaker 24: Almost all of the writing pairs that have come to Broadway have been Jewish whether it's Lerner and Lowe and Rogers and Hammerstein, Jerome Kern. Almost all of them have been Jewish with the exception, I think, of Cole Porter really here. And if you look at their plays, none of them with the exception of Fiddler On the Roof are about overtly Jewish themes, but all of them are about overtly Jewish concerns. So take a play like, My Fair Lady. That's really about
Speaker 4: the rain in Spain stays mainly in a plain.'
Speaker 3: 'I think She's got it. I think she's got it.
Speaker 4: The rain in Spinsea is mainly in the plain.
Speaker 26: By George, he's got it. By George,
Speaker 24: She's an immigrant into that culture, that upper middle Class culture. She needs to learn how to talk, something immigrants are very concerned with. She needs to know how to dress. She needs to know the codes and conventions of society.
Speaker 1: In trouble.
Speaker 0: Irving Berlin did more than any composer to Americanized Jewish To understand Berlin is to understand the Hollywood moguls. Another canter son, he started life in the midst of pogroms.
Speaker 1: My life in
Speaker 0: Berlin was a Russian immigrant who would go on to write the quintessential American songs. He's a kind of Cyrano de Bergerac. Present
Speaker 3: will be questioned
Speaker 0: In the foreground is Fred Astaire, the embodiment of American aristocracy, full of grace and upper sail
Speaker 3: because I invited to step out this evening in top hat, white tie and tail rolling. Putting on the top hat, tying up my white tie, brushing off my tails. I'm doodin' up a shirt front, putting in the shirt studs, polishing my nails. I'm stepping out my dear to breathe an atmosphere that simply wreaks with plants. And I trust that you
Speaker 0: In the background, the person writing the music and the lyrics is this little Jewish guy. For over 60 years, he tried to reinvent himself. In the process, he infused life into a whole new American Deal.
Speaker 3: In the White House, president Eisenhower signs a bill authorizing a gold medal for composer Irving Berlin. It honors him for writing God Bless America and other patriotic songs. For Berlin, this marks another milestone in his rise from humble beginnings to a place of highest esteem the world over.
Speaker 5: I don't know if anything could possibly have happened that touches me as deeply as as this metal. God bless America isn't just a song that I wrote, but it expresses my gratitude for The opportunities and the freedom to write that song and to the country that inspired it. Thank you very much.
Speaker 0: Along with the Unofficial anthem of the United States, Irving Berlin wrote the American classics Easter Parade and that Jewish of the Yuletide fantasies, White Christmas. Louis b Mayer not only celebrated Christmas, he appropriated America's birthday as his own. Mayer claimed that he couldn't remember his real birthday, so he celebrated it on the 4th July.
Speaker 27: When I think of grandpa, I think of these amazing events that were held every year that I was privileged to attend. Patriotism was an important theme in his life, and So he selected the Independence Day as his birthday. And in the studio commissary, every star Under contract was not only invited, but virtually obliged to show up. And these extraordinary events which As I began to become educated and read about European royalty, it seemed to me, in retrospect, more and more like Events held by heads of state. He wrapped himself in the American flag and said, that's me.
I'm
Speaker 28: a Yankee Doodle
Speaker 3: Andy, Yankee Doodle to all die.
Speaker 28: A real live nephew of my uncle Sam,
Speaker 3: She's my Yankee Doodle joy.
Speaker 28: Yankee Doodle came to London just to ride the pony.
Speaker 5: I am the Yankee people born.
Speaker 0: In Hollywood, they joked that the moguls went from Poland to Polo in just 1 generation. They held Easter egg hunts and Christmas parties. Some of them sent their children to Catholic school. Their efforts to reinvent themselves seemed boundless. They even hid their Jewishness from their children and grandchildren.
Speaker 29: I didn't know I was Jewish, till I was certain, till I was at least 7, I think. As I remember, we were in Scarsdale. And, I was going to public school. And my mother said: In case somebody asks you what your religion is, you're Jewish. And, I said, okay.
You know, I mean, I didn't I don't think I even asked for what's that, you know.
Speaker 30: I was brought up by catholic governesses who took me to the catholic churches and I learned I learned prayers in in French and I wore a cross.
Speaker 15: And did you become Catholic?
Speaker 30: No. No. It's just that I didn't know anything about the Jewish religion. I didn't know it what it was.
Speaker 31: I realized that my father had never told me anecdotes about the old country, that I didn't even know What his real name was, I didn't know the, little village that he came from. I knew nothing about his life And, I realized that the name Warner was probably not correct, but I thought being Polish, it might have been Werner. To this day, I really don't know what our original name was.
Speaker 0: Often, the first thing to go was the Jewish name. The Hollywood Jews were obsessed with erasing anything Jewish in their films, their lives, and the lives of their stars.
Speaker 25: Do you know what her name is? Esther Victoria Blodgett.
Speaker 15: Hey, we'll have to do something about that right away. Let's see, Esther Victoria, Victoria, Vicki.
Speaker 3: How about
Speaker 4: Vicki? Oh, I think that's terra vicute.
Speaker 15: Let's see, Vicki. Vicki what?
Speaker 25: Vicki Vicki pronounced Vicki Vicki.
Speaker 15: Siesta has to adjust to Lester. Vicki Lester.
Speaker 5: Oh, I
Speaker 4: like that. Say it. Vicki Lester.
Speaker 3: Say it again.
Speaker 4: Vicki Lester.
Speaker 15: Say it again.
Speaker 4: Vicki Lester.
Speaker 3: Say it. Vicki Lester. Say it. Vicki Lester. Vicki Lester.
Speaker 30: Vicky Lester.
Speaker 5: Vicky Lester.
Speaker 3: Vicky Lester. Vicky Lester.
Speaker 0: Theodosia Goodman became Theda Barra. Sofia became Sylvia Sydney. Mister Danielewicz Demski became Kirk Douglas. Leo Jacoby became Lee Shirley Schrift became Shelley Winters. Bernard Schwartz became Tony Curtis.
David Kaminski became Danny Kaye. Edward Iskovitz became Eddie Cantor. Melvin Hesselberg became Melvin Douglas. Muni Wiesenfreund, a star of the Yiddish theater, became Muni, Emmanuel Goldenberg became Edward g Robinson. The g was a reminder of who he really was.
Nice Jewish girls such as Lily Palmer, Julie Holiday, and Lauren Bacall, Paul or Betty Priskey helped to define the American woman. Not all the Jewish talent went to Hollywood to assimilate. There were over 50 non Hollywood Yiddish films produced in New York before for the 2nd
Speaker 5: World War.
Speaker 0: These films were the flip side of the Hollywood movies. They parody Hollywood's optimism.
Speaker 5: You're right now.
Speaker 0: And Fred Astaire's top gentility. Many who could have gone to stayed in New York to make films that express their Jewish identity.
Speaker 6: These films were shown to an audience, which was almost entirely made up of, of immigrants and sometimes the the children of And these films, by and large, had a very, very different, point of view than Hollywood movies. I mean, the Yiddish movies were kind of fighting a rear guard action protect certain forms of Jewish cultural expression against the sort of overwhelming seductive power of the Larger American culture.
Speaker 0: In this classic of Yiddish cinema, a great cantor played by Moshe Oyser is drawn into the secular world of opera. On the night of his operatic debut, he learns of his son's death. Unable to perform, he returns to a synagogue to lead the high holiday prayers. Heartbroken, he dies. Here, the attempt To reconcile Jewish and secular worlds ends tragically.
Warner Brothers, The Jazz Singer, was a revolutionary silent film that broke into sound with each musical number. Here as in the Yiddish film, a cantor son played by Al Jolson, who was in real Life, a cantor son, has to choose between American fame and Jewish loyalty. At first, the canter's son seems to choose Judaism. But in assimilationist Hollywood, the story could not end there. Hollywood had to have a Hollywood ending.
Dear dad in his old Jewish ways are dead, while the hero in American blackface sings triumphantly with his gentile girlfriend waiting in the wings.
Speaker 4: Where can you
Speaker 0: Again and again in Hollywood films, the old world father is rejected. The mother is idealized, and the rebellious son Sales on to glory.
Speaker 4: I don't want you to go.
Speaker 3: Mom, why can't I go someplace and study to be a doctor?
Speaker 30: Oh, Jason. It takes too long and we haven't any money.
Speaker 3: Money? Well, we won't get any richer if I stay here. Pop's a failure and you know
Speaker 4: Jason, don't you dare. There's a
Speaker 3: boat going up the river tomorrow and I'm going to take
Speaker 32: Well, I think America turned out to be what my grandfather Imagined it to be. There was no, romanticism involved. I mean, you can say it was a romantic idea that a poor guy with $19 Someone in his pocket could be could found an industry. I mean, that's a very romantic idea, but it it turned out to be true. So, in a sense, he was a realist.
Speaker 4: Son, dear,
Speaker 5: feel this.
Speaker 1: What's all stiff?
Speaker 4: I sewed a few dollars in the lining in case you need it.
Speaker 1: Mom?
Speaker 4: Jason, don't feel unkindly toward your father. Everything we did, Everything we've ever done was planned for your own good.
Speaker 3: Please, mom. Don't cry. Don't cry. Someday, I'm coming home with my pockets loaded with money. Honest to Wilma.
You'll see.
Speaker 4: We're in the money. We're in the money.
Speaker 5: We've got a lot of what
Speaker 4: it takes to get along. We're
Speaker 0: They had left the old world penniless. And in less than 20 years, they had become the highest paid executives in America. In fact, for almost a decade, Mayer was the highest salaried man in the world. At this point, they might have concluded that their transformation from Eastern European Jews into Americans was complete, but history intervened to remind them of their origins. It was difficult for the Mogo to entirely abandon their Jewishness while the Nazis were persecuting their European kin.
Some of the Hollywood Jews could not ignore these In 1939, a group of stars including John Garfield, Edward G Robinson, and their spokesman, Melvin Douglas, United States risked their celebrity status measures to Speak out against Hitler.
Speaker 3: That all economic connections between the United States of America and Nazi Germany be totally severed. Until such time as Germany is willing to re enter the family of nations in accordance with the humane principles of international law.
Speaker 0: Though Carl was no longer studio head at this time. He joined the protesters and signed their declaration. With Clemley and Harry Warner were active in sponsoring Jewish refugees from Europe. And in 1939, Warner made this anti fascist speech To the American Legion.
Speaker 3: Drive them out. Make America unsafe for those who seek to tear down what others have built through the generations since 17/76. Drive them from their secret meeting places. Destroy their insidious propaganda machines. Drive out their buns and their leagues, Their clans and black legion.
The silver shirts, the black shirts, and the dirty shirts help keep America for those who believe in America.
Speaker 0: In response to Hollywood's limited anti fascist stand, former US ambassador to Britain, Joseph p Kennedy, flew Los Angeles. At a secret meeting, he told the moguls that American Jews would be blamed if the United States were dragged into war with Germany. He warned them to stop agitating against Nazism. The Kennedy meeting had its desired effect.
Speaker 33: At the end of 19 thirties, as the shadows of war are haunting Europe, The Jews in Hollywood are very much afraid of warning American audiences of those dangers because it looks as though it's a special Jewish Angle. It looks parochial. It looks limited. And therefore, it's difficult to make anti Nazi movies in Hollywood Because the Jews don't want to stand out.
Speaker 0: The Jewish fear of standing out was expressed through another icon that would make its way to the screen.
Speaker 6: Superman was invented by 2 Jewish, kids in the late 19 thirties when there also Was a, a worldwide, upsurge in in in very frightening antisemitism. Superman is discovered like Moses in the bull rushes. He's an immigrant from another, planet who comes to Earth. He has his identity as a as a as a mild mannered intellectual, but really underneath, He's the man of steel. I think that's a very suggestive Jewish fantasy.
It's almost as if he's passing all the time.
Speaker 0: While the Jew felt like an alien America, Superman was a real alien.
Speaker 15: This looks like a job for Superman.
Speaker 0: Yet incredibly, he is the only superhero who manages to keep his that it is secret without wearing a mask. Only Jews could have created a story based on the premise that all one needs is a gentile demeanor to hide in plain sight.
Speaker 15: I bet you recognize him. Why, of course, you Recognize him. It's adenoid tingle of.
Speaker 0: Like Superman, the Hollywood moguls were unwilling to risk their gentile disguise. As a result, only 2 anti Nazi films were made before the war.
Speaker 1: No. No. No. No. No.
No.
Speaker 0: Charlie Chaplin financed and made the classic film, The Great Dictator. Chaplain was neither Jewish nor American, so he didn't share the fears of the Hollywood Jewels. Warner Brothers made confessions of a Nazi spy only after their Jewish representative in Germany was beaten to death by Hitler's henchmen. Incredibly, this Hollywood film about the dangers of Nazism makes no reference to either Jews or All this changed on December the 7th 1941 with the attack on the US Navy at Pearl Harbor by Hitler's Japanese allies. Now instead of Hollywood to keep quiet, the US government began pushing them to fulfill their duty and make patriotic war movies.
Speaker 25: All that noise you hear isn't static. It's death coming to London. Yes. They're coming here now. You can hear the Thumbs falling on the streets and the homes.
Don't tune me out. Hang on a while. This is a big story and you're part of it. It's too late to do anything here now except stand in the dark and let them As if the lights were all out everywhere except in America. Keep those lights burning.
Cover them with steel. Bring them with guns. Build a canopy of battleships and bombing planes around. Hello, America. Hang on.
Speaker 2: It's a wonderful time for the Hollywood Jews. Here were a group of Jews who had spent their lives seeking legitimacy and seeking to be embraced by America. And World War 2 finally affords them that opportunity to be embraced officially. They are now real patriots.
Speaker 3: Will you check with MGM and see if they'll postpone the Hedy Lamarr picture so we can use whoever the bond drives? Surely. RKO just okayed Cary Grant. We'll hear from Paramount later today on Colbert and Dick Powell. Oh, swell.
Come and check the foyer and Adam Custer. Wait the Without charge, all its newest and best feature films to the US War Department overseas film division.
Speaker 24: The movies were tremendous propagandistic tool during this time. They set up camps for the soldiers to come back in where movies were shown 24 hours a day because that impressed the soldiers with what they were fighting for.
Speaker 0: It was the beginning of an unprecedented alliance between Washington and Hollywood.
Speaker 5: And you swear that you will bear to faith an allegiance to the United States of America?
Speaker 15: I do
Speaker 0: For the first time, Hollywood's message was adopted by the government. A democratic state could not send minorities, immigrants, the poor to die for an America which excluded them. So if the enemies were fascist, the American army had to be portrayed is caring and sharing.
Speaker 3: I want you to feel free to ask questions, even embarrassing ones. Come tell me with suggestions. We are going to be more than officers and men in this. We are going to be comrades. What I eat, you will eat.
Where I sleep, you will sleep. I will take into my confidence whenever it's possible before going into battle. We'll have a meeting of which I'll explain our plans and objectives, so Each of you can make a more intelligent contribution to the result. Afterward, we'll have another meeting And win together. Yeah.
Speaker 20: We would have equal opportunity foxholes. If you You go back and look at those movies, there was always 1 Jewish character who was never presented as Jewish, but, he was, Cohen or Schwartz from Brooklyn. There was always 1 black character too.
Speaker 3: West Lief's private, 3rd Engineer battalion.
Speaker 20: The American army during the Second World War was not integrated except in Hollywood movies. And the Office of War Information was very eager to keep our enemies from making capital out of any sort of problems in America. So they didn't want movies that had any racial tensions Of any sort.
Speaker 3: Corporal Jake Feingold, 4th Chemical Company, you
Speaker 0: And in Europe, their kinsmen in Hollywood were churning out patriotic movies to help galvanize the allies to defeat Hitler. Jack Warner really believed that his movies helped to win the war. He loved to point out that the chemical ingredients The film were also used to make smokeless gunpowder.
Speaker 3: Mister Warner, for his experience and background in the motion picture industry, impelled by the finest patriotic motives, and on his own initiative, pointed out to the arms and of the United States forces, the use that could be made of a motion picture in the effective prosecution of a war.
Speaker 0: Despite appearances the contrary, events would soon demonstrate that the Hollywood Jews were still fearful immigrants seeking acceptance It's from Gentile America.
Speaker 2: Shortly after the war, the State Department organized a tour the number of Hollywood executives, most of whom were Jewish, to visit Europe and see the concentration camps.
Speaker 5: Work of Universal, mister Harry Cohn of Columbia and mister Jack Warner being emphatic at the end of the line.
Speaker 2: We have almost no testimony from these Hollywood Jews on their reaction to what they saw. We have no idea really of how deeply it impacted them. All we know is that with the when they return to the United States, one might think that someone there might have been moved To make some film or at least some gesture that would memorialize the 6,000,000 who died. And what is interesting is the absence of any such film, or any such gesture. Perhaps, it affected them in such a way that like everything else that's filtered through the Hollywood Jewish consciousness, they felt they could not, They better not express it.
Speaker 0: At this time, only 2 films on anti Semitism came out of Hollywood. Both were made by non Jews.
Speaker 34: You see, because they made 50 or 60 pictures a year, they always made 4 or 5 What they call prestige pictures. I could go to them and say, look, I've got a thing here that may not make any money, but it's a prestige picture. The critics are gonna like it and The the intellectual is gonna like it, and you're gonna get a lot of credit for making this kind of a picture because it has something to say. And just as often as not, you could talk them into it as long as there weren't too many of them. We wanted to make, Crossfire, which is the 1st picture ever made about anti Semitism.
You know, we didn't know whether it was gonna make any money or not. We didn't know whether anybody would want to listen to a went on anti Semitism or
Speaker 2: not, which is why we made
Speaker 34: a murder mystery out of it. Strangely enough, none of the 3 of us, the writer, the producer, nor I, none of us was Jewish.
Speaker 15: Thomas Findlay was killed in 18/48 just because he was an Irishman and a Catholic. It happened many times. Maybe that's hard for you to believe, Leroy, but it's true. And last night, Joseph Samuels was killed just because he was a Jew. Do you see any difference, Leroy?
Any difference at all? Hating is always the same. Always senseless. One day, it kills Irish Catholics. The next day, Jews.
The next day, Protestants. The next day, Quakers. It's hard to stop. It can end up killing men who wear strike neckties. There seems to be some mistake because we don't have a free room in the entire hotel.
But if you'd like, perhaps I can fix you over at the Brewster Hotel down near the station. I'm not staying
Speaker 3: at the Brewster. Look, I'm Jewish and you don't take Jews, that's it, isn't it?
Speaker 15: I never said that.
Speaker 3: If you don't accept, you say so.
Speaker 15: Don't raise your voice to me, mister Green. Speak a little more quietly, please.
Speaker 3: Do you or don't you?
Speaker 15: Mister Green, I'm a very busy man. Now if you want me to phone for a cab or room at the Brewster, I'll do so. Otherwise
Speaker 3: Otherwise, what?
Speaker 0: Gentleman's Agreement centers on the story of a Gentile magazine writer played by Gregory Peck, who pretends to be a Jew he can write an expose on antisemitism in America. This film was also made by a non Jew, Darryl f Zanuck.
Speaker 24: There's a very famous scene in there based on a very famous incident in which, supposedly, the Jewish moguls got together and went to Zanuck, whose studio was producing the film, and said, we will pay you $1,000,000 to destroy all the prints of this film. This is too This is too incendiary. Let us handle it. And Zanuck said no, immediately went back to his office And wrote that scene in.
Speaker 3: Mister Green is going to do a series on anti Semitism for us.
Speaker 15: Really? Again. Not again. For the 1st time. We're going to split it wide open.
Do you mind my saying as an old friend, I think it a very bad idea, John? It's The worst, the most harmful thing you can possibly do now. Not at all. Why is it
Speaker 3: a harmful idea?
Speaker 1: Because it'll only stir it up more.
Speaker 15: That's why. Let it alone. We'll handle it in our own way. The hush-hush way? Oh, I don't care what you call it.
Speaker 3: Let it alone.
Speaker 15: We can't write it out of existence. We've been fighting it for years. We know from experience, the less talk there is about it, the better. Sure.
Speaker 0: The moguls needn't have worried. Gentleman's agreement was consistent with Hollywood's ideology.
Speaker 24: Now first of all, the assumption of that film is that anybody can pass for being Jewish, Even among other Jews, and I don't think that assumption is very true. In fact, when he decides to take on the identity, he looks in, he has a Good friend Dave Goldberg, played by John Garfield, he looks in the mirror and he says, dark hair, dark eyes, just like Dave. No telling characteristics, Just like Dave and he passes. He immediately goes out and he passes.
Speaker 21: It'll work fine, Phil.
Speaker 24: The theme is not you should be Nice to Jews, whoever they are, but rather you have to be nice to them because they're just like us. There's a funny story, Moss Hart wrote about, they had screened the film for the people in, the crew and after it was done, one of the members of the crew came up to Hart and he said, that was an incredibly inspiring film. I really learned a lot. And Hart was very proud of this because he had thought he had taught this lesson of tolerance. And And he
Speaker 5: said, well, what have you
Speaker 24: learned? And he said, I should be nice to all Jews because they may turn out to be gentiles.
Speaker 0: The line between gentile and Jew was precisely what the Moguls wanted. In fact, some of Hollywood's leading Jews openly espoused assimilation and the literal mixing of bloods as an American ideal.
Speaker 3: Mayor studios, Mister Lewis b Mayer, an all American in heart, in spirit, and in soul.
Speaker 0: The call for the creation of a new human type, liberated from the past.
Speaker 3: We gather here today Not as Catholics, Protestants, or Jews. All of the ancient floods have contributed to those who meet here today. This great country is itself the result of the unity of all of these ancient floods. We are here as Americans. This great radio program sponsored by the motion picture industry It's intended to remind us all of the liberties and privileges with which we are blessed in this country.
Let us now reaffirm the glory of The greatest, the freest, and the happiest ism in all the world. Calling the house un American activities committee to order, chairman j Parnell Thomas of New Jersey He opens an inquiry into possible communist penetration of the Hollywood film industry. The committee is seeking to determine if red party members have reached the screen with burst of propaganda.
Speaker 0: To the mogul's surprise, powerful men in Washington saw Hollywood's patriotism as nothing more than thinly disguised communism. Now at the height of their success, the Hollywood Jews watch their dream fall apart. While economic factors played a role in their demise. It was the House Un American Activities Committee, HUAC, which really brought them down.
Speaker 5: This committee, under its mandate from the house of representatives, has the responsibility of exposing and And spotlighting subversive elements wherever they may exist. That communist have made such an attempt in Hollywood and with considerable success Is already evident.
Speaker 0: With the advent of the Cold War, HUAC began persecuting Hollywood for the populist and pro Soviet films the Roosevelt administration encouraged Hollywood to make during the 2nd World War.
Speaker 3: Did you cook this dinner?
Speaker 35: I did.
Speaker 2: But you're a pianist. How can you let her do such work?
Speaker 3: How can I let her? The Krishnies, how can I stop you?
Speaker 4: I would not be happy here on the farm if
Speaker 35: I did not do my share of the work.
Speaker 3: No. But is it necessary did you drive a tractor?
Speaker 35: It is a privilege to drive the tractor.
Speaker 5: The committee is determined that the hearing shall be fair and impartial. We have subpoenaed witnesses representing both sides of the question. All we are after are the facts.
Speaker 14: I should like to see what you have.
Speaker 0: 1st came the mostly Jewish Hollywood talent who stood up to HUAC.
Speaker 3: Are you a member of The communist party.
Speaker 5: Next, you are going to ask
Speaker 3: what my religious beliefs are.
Speaker 5: And you are going to
Speaker 3: insist before various members of the industry that since you don't like my religious beliefs, I should not work in that industry.
Speaker 23: There became an identification in people's minds With the things that went together, intellectuals, Jews, Russians, communists, If you look back at any of the depictions of what communists were, all of these things kinda get merged together in the in the public imagination.
Speaker 2: The chairman of the committee, at the time that it initiated its investigation of Hollywood was a vicious anti semite from Mississippi by the name of John Reinking. And Reinking Sad on the floor of congress. I'm just gonna read up an excerpt from from a speech he gave. He said communism is the most dangerous influence in the world today. I am talking about the communism of Leon Trotsky, of course he mentions a Jew, that is based upon hatred for Christianity.
You know that communism. Remember that communism and Christianity can never live in the same atmosphere. Communism is older than Christianity. This is a revision of history since Karl Marx, to most people's knowledge, is the is the one who created communism. But this communism, which is clearly a euphemism for Judaism, is older than Christianity.
It is the curse of the ages. It hounded and persecuted the savior during his earthly ministry, Inspired his crucifixion, derided him in his dying agony, and then gambled for his garments at the foot of the cross.
Speaker 3: But We are today in a deadly conflict between those 2 ideologies, and There can be no compromise. Mister, right? I hope that you're not impugning in any way the American activities of the motion picture employers in
Speaker 1: I am some I
Speaker 3: am some of them now, Steve. I want to tell you right now that there is no group of more American in the country than are those in Hollywood. Well I wanna tell you some of the things they're doing. But I know I know some of the things they're doing, and I know some of the
Speaker 25: things that during the property you don't know, but
Speaker 3: I can tell you now, you need a housecleaning, and they need it very badly. The question of communism is in no way related to this inquiry, which is an attempt to get control of the screen and to invade the basic rights of America. Damn and American citizens whether they be Protestant or Methodist or Jewish or Catholic, Have you ever been a member of the communist party? Have you ever been a member of the communist party? Her purpose is to use this to disrupt the motion picture
Speaker 18: The president of the United States said That anti communism was American policy, and that scared the shit out of Because the last thing they wanted to be called was un American. Having flirted with the idea of being Americans for so long, They began to believe that possibly they were.
Speaker 3: I'm just hopeful, like I told you, mister Smith, in California, that perhaps Out of this hearing, our congress
Speaker 0: Now came the moguls who are out to prove their American patriotism.
Speaker 3: Give us a policy how to handle American citizens who don't deserve to be if they are communist to get them out
Speaker 25: of our place. Ideology term ideological terms rather, termites have burrowed into many American Organizations and societies, wherever they may be, I say, let us dig them out and get rid of them. My brothers and I will be happy to subscribe generously to a pest removal fund. We are willing to establish such a fund to ship to Russia, the people who don't like our American system of government and prefer the communist system to ours.
Speaker 5: And in their method. In their studio, you mean? In our studio. Well, how do you you mean un American because they are communist or American because they're fashion. No.
Un American because they endeavor to put certain things into scripts. In my personal opinion as an American, and I, my business has seen that it doesn't get in, it's my if it and eventually He laid dust and creeped in. I cut it out. Well, there's there's been a difference so long as a person is a feminist
Speaker 3: or a fascist
Speaker 5: so The line is these un American. Isn't that true? I I am not qualified to answer that. But you are not, brother, Some people in your study, Moe, that are in America. Yes.
I understand that.
Speaker 36: The way the Moguls buckled was If the Cossacks are coming again, they were unsure of their status, a lot more unsure, say, than the next generation of Who were writers say or directors or actors, you know, who were born in America and as I was and Had no, no confusion at all about being Americans. We were Americans and felt we had all the rights of Americans and Would fight for them when we could.
Speaker 15: I am against I am, I speak
Speaker 25: I'm for everything that you said. What I
Speaker 3: If you agree with that statement,
Speaker 5: I agree wholeheartedly, and I
Speaker 3: the statement was a little long. It was a very Good statement is
Speaker 25: a statement of a real American.
Speaker 0: To appease UAC, the Moguls instituted a blacklist of studio talent. Years before, they had fled European anti Semitism. But now in America, they became collaborators, Helping anti Semites rid Hollywood of Jewish intellectuals. In effect, they had surrendered control of the industry. If you look at the main factors
Speaker 2: in what caused the Mogul's decline, I think you have to look at them psychologically and not to external After all these years of commanding these studios, HUAC And other factors demonstrated to them that all the things they had dreamt All the hopes that they had had, all the emotion that they invested into their assimilation were really empty.
Speaker 3: It all seems so simple, Lance. Live your life. Do your work as simple as all that. You find out it's not that easy. Nothing comes free.
One way or another, you pay for what you are.
Speaker 0: After HUAC, the fight went out of the Hollywood Jews. They lost their hold on the studios they created. Like the wizard of Oz, having been exposed as fearful refugees fleeing from They couldn't go on pretending to be Moguls.
Speaker 3: There are many here To whom I owe a great thought of thanks, I have appreciation in my heart without their aid, their loyalty and devotion. I would not be standing here taking the bow.
Speaker 27: He lived in 1957. He was fired in 1952. So the last 5 years of his life were Face back and forth again. I don't want to extend the lion metaphor excessively, but all that energy was now confined to the home. I mean, that studio was his greater family and he really couldn't bear it.
And the pain was evident in his face, in his physical body language, In in the anxiety in his voice, in his temper, it was just heartbreaking.
Speaker 0: As he approached death, Maier fell back on religion, but not Judaism. He took religious instruction from Fulton j Sheen, the leading exponent of popular Catholicism. According to some, Mayer was prepared to convert. His daughter Irene told him that people would scream with was buried a Jew. Harry Cohn died a year later.
His gentile wife was with him at the end.
Speaker 37: Harry was in on the in the ambulance suffering from a massive heart attack and you had, was in pain, you know, and he says, oh Jesus Jesus Christ because of the pain from this heart thing. So Joan says, Harry, Harry, my Harry, you found Christ, you know, and so she converts them to Catholicism. Well, on the sarcophagus where Harry there's a cross and a star on the sarcophagus. If Harry knew that and knew what Joan did. He turned over in his grave.
Speaker 0: Harry Warner also died in 1950 gate of a stroke following a bitter argument with his brother, Jack. Jack spent his last years in the south of France, playing the Gentleman's game of schman the fare and palling around with fated members of European royalty. He died in 1978 from injuries he received after falling while playing tennis. Carl Laemmle did not live to see HUAC and the end of the studio era. He sold out his interests in Universal in 1936, Spent his last years close to his grandchildren and died in 1939.
But Paramount's Adolph Zukor, The 1st mogul lived on, becoming a venerated relic of the past.
Speaker 5: His signature in cement and then his hand and footprints. He is the 1st motion picture executive so honored. Alongside many screen immortals to whom he gave their 1st chance, go the imprints of mister motion pictures.
Speaker 0: Promoting Horatio Alger's American dream to the end, he died in 19 76 at the age of 103.
Speaker 5: In this blessed land, we can go as far as we want. If we only put into practice, racial elders' deep and abiding faith in honesty, Hard work and decency.
Speaker 0: And Rankine has given way to an alien ideology. It isn't the communism or Judaism that the gentile elite once feared. It's Americanism As defined by Hollywood. The icons endure. The little guy fighting the The pogrom imagery.
The desperate desire to survive, and the various races assimilating
Speaker 3: to create the ultimate happy ending.
Speaker 34: Fashion. Elohim.
Speaker 0: And happy ending. I'm not Jewish. Nobody's perfect.
Speaker 3: Sir, sir.
Speaker 0: A white middle class president Articulating the Jewish experience writ large. A new global religion, Hollywood
Speaker 26: Perhaps spake that today is the 4th July, and you will once again be fighting for our freedom. Not from tyranny, oppression, or persecution, but from annihilation. We're fighting for our right to live, to exist. And Should we win the day, the 4th July will no longer be known as an American holiday, but as the day when the world declared in one voice, we will not go quietly into the night. We will not vanish without a fight.
We're going to live on. We're going to survive. Today, we celebrate Our Independence Day.
Speaker 23: There was a Hollywoodism then. There's a Hollywoodism today. I would go further and say it is what is the ruling ideology of our culture. Hollywood culture Culture is the dominant culture. It is the fantasy structure that we're all living inside.
Speaker 5: Oh,
Speaker 1: What is America to me? A name, a map, For a flag, I see a certain word. Democracy. What is America
Speaker 29: to
Speaker 1: And the people that I meet, the children in the playground, The faces that I see all races and religion. That's America to me. The place I I work here, the worker by my side, the little town or city Where my people live and die. The howdy and the handshake. The air of feeling free and the right to speak my mind out.
That's America to me. The things I see about me, the big things and the small, the The little corner newsstand and the house a mile tall. The wedding The The church, the school, the clubhouse, the 1,000,000 lights I see.
reSee.it AI Summary
The film from 1946 highlights the power of controlling information, a practice that discourages critical thought and makes people easier to control. From indoctrination to adulthood, blind trust in narratives is fostered, dismissing dissenting voices. The COVID response has shown the importance of questioning everything in a world filled with propaganda and psychological operations.
@_BlakeHabyan - Blake
Must Watch: 1946 Film Tells The Power Of Controlling Information: This Video Was Removed From Libraries By 1967: Discouraging critical thought and questioning narratives has been practiced for many years by design. This makes people easier to control. Starting with the indoctrination of youth and lasting throughout adulthood, these concepts lead people to blindly trust what they are told. Dissenting voices are more likely to be dismissed without critical thought. How many times have you seen someone say “That’s dumb, there’s no way.”, and that thing turned out to be true? For many people, this happened with the COVID response. In today’s world that’s littered with propaganda and military-grade psychological operations, it’s extremely important to question everything.
Video Transcript AI Summary
A community trains its teachers to discourage independent thinking and promote blind acceptance. Students are told not to question authority and are taught to unquestioningly believe everything they are told. The control extends to books, newspapers, and the radio, where only the information approved by those in power is allowed. Government censorship and private interests play a role in controlling the flow of information.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: See how a community trains its teachers.
Speaker 1: Bear this in mind. Young people cannot be trusted to form their own opinions. This business about open mindedness is nonsense. It's a waste of time trying to teach students to think for themselves. Own.
It's our job to tell them.
Speaker 0: And when teachers put such training into own. Despotism stands a good chance. These children are being taught to accept uncritically whatever they're told. Own. Questions are not encouraged.
Speaker 2: How can you ask such a question? Have you got a textbook? Yes, Yes, ma'am. Doth it say here that our law courts are always just? Yes, ma'am.
Then how dare you question the fact? Own. Sit down.
Speaker 0: And so we aren't surprised when?
Speaker 2: But it must be true. I saw it in this book right here.
Speaker 0: Own. And if books and newspapers and the radio are efficiently controlled, the people will read and accept exactly only what the few in control want them to. Government censorship is one form of control. Own. A newspaper which breaks a government censorship rule can be suspended.
It is also possible for newspapers and other forms of communication to be controlled by private interests.
@mistergusano - Gusano
I used to have this interview pinned in my profile. I think it’s time to bring it back. It is the full interview of Yuri Bezmenov on the Four Stages of Ideological Subversion. This comes in a perfect timing with the Putin and Tucker interview. Stop falling for propaganda. https://t.co/Wl8y9VQSRX
Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, Yuri Alexandrovich Besmianoff, a former KGB agent, shares his personal experiences growing up in the Soviet Union and working for the KGB. He discusses the propaganda and brainwashing techniques employed by the Soviet government and highlights the oppressive nature of the regime. Due to moral objections, Besmianoff eventually defected to the West. He criticizes American journalists and intellectuals for their support of the Soviet regime. Besmianoff also reveals the KGB's strategy of targeting leftists and recruiting individuals lacking moral principles in conservative media, academia, and the film industry. Leftists are used to destabilize nations and then discarded. The speaker witnessed the Soviet Union's plans to invade East Pakistan during their time in India. They explain the process of ideological subversion, which aims to change Americans' perception of reality to prevent them from defending themselves and their country. The speaker warns that America's demoralization is already complete and irreversible, urging Americans to educate themselves, understand the danger of socialism, and cease aiding communism. The role of Western support in sustaining the Soviet system and the possibility of change in the Soviet Union are also discussed.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: My father was he's on the left here. My father was officer of the General Staff of the Soviet Army. He was inspector of Land Forces. Soviet troops stationed in countries like Mongolia, Cuba, East European countries. This is the picture taken at the entrance of my Institute of Oriental Languages.
It's a part of Moscow State University. As every Soviet student, I was quote unquote volunteering for harvesting grain in Kazakhstan. By the end of my training in school, I was recruited by the KGB. This picture was taken on that day and you can see again how happy It feels to be recruited by the KGB. Pay special attention to number of bottles on the table.
One of my functions was to keep foreign guests permanently intoxicated the moment they land at Moscow Airport. In 1967, the KGB attached me to this magazine, Look Magazine, a group of 12 people arrived to USSR from United States to cover 50th anniversary of October socialist revolution in my country. From the first page to the last page, it was a package of lies.
Speaker 1: Our conversation is with mister Yuri Alexandrovich Besmianoff. Mister Besanov was born in 1939 in a suburb of Moscow. He was the son of a high ranking Soviet Army officer. He was educated in the elite schools inside the Soviet Union and became an expert in Indian culture and Indian languages. He had an outstanding career with Novesty, which was the and still is, I should say, the press arm or the press agency of the Soviet Union.
It turns out that this is also a front for the KGB. One of his interesting assignments was to brainwash foreign diplomats when they visited Moscow. And he'll tell us a little bit about how they did this and how they planted information which eventually wound up in the press of the free world. He escaped to the West in 1970 after becoming totally disgusted with the Soviet system, And he did this at great risk to his life. He certainly is one of the world's outstanding experts on the subject of Soviet propaganda and disinformation and active measures.
Mr. Besmianoff, I'd like to begin by having you tell us a little bit about some of your childhood memories.
Speaker 0: Well, the most vivid memory of my childhood was Second World War, or to be more precise, the end of the Second World War, when all of a sudden United States from a friendly nation, which helped us to defeat Nazism, turned overnight into a deadly enemy. And it was very shocking because all newspapers were trying to present an image of belligerent, aggressive American imperialism. Most of the things that we were taught is that United States is aggressive power, which is just about to invade our beautiful free socialist country, that American CIA is dropping in Colorado beetles in our beautiful potato fields to eliminate our crops. And each schoolboy had a picture of Colorado bug on the on the back page of his notebook. And we were instructed to go into collective fields to search for those little Colorado bugs.
Of course, we couldn't find any, neither we could find many potatoes, and that was explained again by the encroachments of the decadent imperialist power. The anti American paranoia hysteria in in the Soviet propaganda was to such an of such a higher degree, that many less skeptical people or less stubborn would really believe that United States is just about to invade our beautiful motherland, and some secretly hope that it will come true. That's interesting. Yes.
Speaker 1: Well, getting back to life inside the Soviet Union or inside Communist countries in general, In this country, at the university level primarily, we read and hear that, the Soviet system is different from ours but not that different and that there is a convergence developing between all of the systems of the world and that really it doesn't make an awful lot of difference what system you live under because you have corruption and dishonesty and tyranny and all that sort of thing. From your personal experience, what is the difference between life under Communism and life in the United States?
Speaker 0: Well, life is obviously very much different for for simple reason that, the Soviet Union is a state capitalist Economically, it's a state capitalism where an individual has absolutely no rights, no value. His life is nothing. It's just like an insect. He's disposable. Whereby in United States, even the even the worst criminal is treated as a human being.
He has a fair trial, and some of them capitalize on their crimes. They they publish their memoirs in their prisons and get handsomely paid by your crazy publishers. The differences, of course, in the daily life are very various depending on who whom we are talking about. In my own private life, I never suffered from communism simply because I was brought up in the family of high ranking military officer. Most of the doors were open for me.
Most of my expenses were paid by the government, and I never had any troubles in with the authorities or with the police. So in other words, I would say I enjoyed or I had good reasons to enjoy all the advantages of so called socialist system. My main motivations to defect was had nothing to do with affluence. It was mainly moral indignation, moral protest, rebellion against the inhuman methods of of the Soviet system.
Speaker 1: Well, specifically, what did you object to? I objected, first
Speaker 0: of all, against oppression of my own dissidents and intellectuals. And that was the most disgusting thing that that I witnessed as a as a young man young student who was brought up a very troublesome period in our history from Stalin to Khrushchev, from total tyranny and oppression to some kind of liberalization. 2nd, when I started working for the Soviet embassy in India, I to my horror, I discovered that we are millions times more oppressive than any colonial or imperialist power in the history of mankind that my country brings to India not freedom progress and and friendship between the nations, But, racism, exploitation, and slavery, and and, of course, economical inefficiency to this country. Since I fell in love with India, I developed something which by KGB standards is extremely dangerous thing. It's called split loyalty.
When an agent likes a country of assignment more than his own country. I literally fell in love with this beautiful country, A country of great contrast, but also great humility, great tolerance, and and if philosophically and intellectual freedoms. My ancestors used to live in caves and eat raw meat when India was highly civilized nation 6000 years ago. So obviously, the choice was not to the advantage of my own nation. I decided to defect and to entirely dissociate myself from the brutal regime.
Speaker 1: Mister Besmionov, we've read a lot about the concentration camps in the slave labor camps under the Stalin regime. Now the general impression in America is that those things are part of the past. Are they still going on today? Or what is the status?
Speaker 0: Yes. There is no qualitative change in in the Soviet concentration camp system. There are changes in in numbers of prisoners. Again, this is unreliable Soviet statistics. We don't know how many political prisoners are there in the Soviet concentration camps, But we sure know from from various sources that at each particular time, there are close to 25 to 30,000,000 of Soviet citizens who are virtually kept as slaves in forced labor camp system.
The size of the population of country like Canada is serving terms as as prisoners. Incredible. So I would say that Those intellectuals who try to convince American public that concentration camp system is a thing of a past are either conscientiously misleading public opinion or they are not very intellectual people. They They're selectively blind.
Speaker 1: They don't they lack intellectual honesty when they say that. Well, we've spoken about the intellectuals in this country and also the intellectuals in the Soviet Union. What about down At the broad mass level, do the people in general, the working the working people, the workers in general in the Soviet Union, do they support the system? Do they tolerate it? What is their attitude?
Speaker 0: Well, average Soviet citizen, if there is such an animal, of course, does not like the system Because it hurts. It kills. He may not understand the the reasons. He he may not have enough information or or educational background to understand, but I doubt very much there are many people who are Conscientiously supporting the Soviet system. There are no such such people in USSR.
Even those who have all the reasons to enjoy socialism, people like myself who are a member of journalistic elite, They also hate system for for different reasons, though, not because they lack material affluence, but because they are unfree to think. They're in constant fear, duplicity, split personality, and this is the greatest tragedy for my nation.
Speaker 1: Well, what do you think are the chances of the people actually overcoming their system or replacing it?
Speaker 0: There is a great possibility that system will sooner or later be destroyed from within. There is a self destructive mechanism built in into any socialist or communist or fascist system because there is lack of feedback because the system does not rely upon loyalty of population. But until and until this Soviet junta is being supported by the Western so called imperialists, that is multinational companies, establishments, governments, and let's face it, intellectuals, so called academia in the United States is famous for porting the Soviet system. As long as the Soviet junta will keep on receiving credits, money, technology, grain deals, and political recognition from all these traitors of democracy or freedom, There is no hope. There is not much hope for for changes in my country, and the system will not collapse by itself simply because it's it's being nourished by so called American imperialism.
This is the greatest Paradox in history of mankind when, capitalist world supports and actively nourishes Its own destroyer destructor.
Speaker 1: I think you're trying to tell us something
Speaker 0: Oh, yes.
Speaker 1: The country.
Speaker 0: I'm trying to tell you that it it has to be stopped unless you want to end up in in gulag system and enjoy all the advantages of socialist Equality, working for free, catching fleas on your body, sleeping on planks of plywood in Alaska this time, I guess. That's where Americans will belong unless they will wake up, course, enforce their government to stop aiding Soviet fascism.
Speaker 1: Well, you told us a moment ago why you left The system, I'd like to hear the details of how you did it. It must have been a very dangerous thing.
Speaker 0: It was not so dangerous. It was crazy. 1st of all, because defecting in India is virtually impossible. Thanks to very strong pressure from the Soviet government.
Speaker 1: Excuse me. You were in in on assignment
Speaker 0: at that time. I was working for the Soviet Embassy in New Delhi as a press officer. Mhmm. And, defecting for a Soviet diplomat is next to impossible. It's a suicide, as I said, because A great friend Indira Gandhi pushed a law through parliament which says, and I quote, no defector from any country has a right of political asylum in any embassy on the territory of Indian Republic, which is a masterpiece of hypocrisy.
No other defector, but the Soviet one needs a political asylum. So knowing that perfectly well, I I I planned a craziest possible way to defect. I started counterculture in India. There are there were thousands of young American boys and girls with no shoes, long hair, smoking hush and marijuana, studying sometimes Indian philosophy, sometimes simply pretending that they studied. And they greatly annoyed Indian police, and they were laughing stock of Indians because, obviously, they they were good for nothing students.
I studied carefully where they congregate, what routes they travel, what language they speak, what do they smoke. And one day, I simply joined a group of hippies to avoid detection of Indian police. I was dressed as a typical hippie with blue jeans, long camis shirts with all kind of nice decorations like these. Long hairs, I I I bought a wig because for several weeks, I had to turn myself from a conservative Soviet diplomat into a very progressive American hippie. And that was the only way that that I could avoid detection.
It was very interesting experience, But it was necessary because, from my own knowledge as a as a member of Soviet embassy staff, I knew that There were many cases when Soviet defectors were betrayed by Indian police, and, also, some Western embassies played a very dirty role in betraying the Soviet defectors. According to our information, there were some, I wouldn't call them double agents, but simply a moral people working for this for the United States Embassy And, confining in in people like this would be suicide. So I had to be extremely careful. I could not trust anyone. And that was the that was the reason for such a crazy way to defect.
Speaker 1: Well, had you been caught In the act of trying to get out, what would have happened to you?
Speaker 0: Oh, most likely, I would end up in in concentration camp, Or depending on the situation and on on the on the whim of some bureaucrat in KGB, Or maybe even executed. This is normal practice quietly, of course, not publicly. But that would be the end of my infection, of course.
Speaker 1: Well, when did you finally make it to the United States?
Speaker 0: In 1970, after about 6 months of debriefing in Athens by the CIA, and I presume FBI too, they let me go first to Germany then to Canada. That was my decision. I had to change my identity to protect my family and my friends in in USSR. And, also, I was a little bit paranoid, knowing that both Soviet KGB and probably some Double agents within American system may be after me. So I wanted to settle down as far away as possible.
I requested CIA to give me some kind of new identity and just let me go on my own and I settled in Canada. I was a student. I changed many professions from farm help and and laundry truck driver to instruct language instructor and broadcaster for Canadian Broadcasting Corporation in Montreal.
Speaker 1: Well, have you had any threats on your life or any Yes. Unpleasant
Speaker 0: In about 5 years, KGB eventually discovered that I am working for Canadian Broadcasting. I made a very big mistake. I started talk I started working for Overseas service of CBC, which is similar to Voice of America in Russian language. And, of course, monitoring service in USSR picked up every new voice. Every new announcer would they they would make it the point to discover who he is.
And in 5 years, sure enough, slowly but surely, they discovered that I am not Thomas Schuman, that I am Yuri Alexandrovich Bismyanov, and that I'm working for Canadian Broadcasting, and undermining beautiful detente between Canada and USSR. And the Soviet ambassador, Alexander Yakovlev, made it his personal effort to credit me. He complained to Pierre Trudeau, who is known to be a little bit soft on socialism. And The management of CBC behaved in a very strange, cowardly way, unbecoming to representatives of an independent country like Canada, they listened to every suggestion that Soviet ambassador gave, and they started shameful investigation, analyzing content of my broadcasts to USSR. And sure enough, they discovered that some of my Statements were probably to, would be offending to the Soviet politburo.
So I had to to leave my my job. And, of course, subtle intimidations. They would say something like, Please cross the street carefully because, you know, traffic is very heavy in Quebec. And, Fortunately, I know about the psychology and and the logic of activity of the KGB, and I never allowed myself to be intimidated. This is the worst thing.
This is what they expect a person, a defector to be intimidated. Once they spot that that you are scared, they keep on developing that line. And then eventually, you either have to give up entirely and work for them Or you they neutralize you. They they they would definitely stop all kind of political activity, which they failed to do in my case Because I was stubbornly working for the Canadian Broadcasting. And, in response to the intimidations, I said that, look, this is a free country, And I am as free as you are, and I also can drive very fast.
And gun control is not yet established in Canada, so I had A couple of good shotguns in my basement. So welcome to visit me someday with your Kalashnikov machine guns. So, obviously, it didn't work. Intimidation didn't work. So they they tried different approach, as I described.
They approached On the highest level, on the level of Canadian bureaucracy At that level, they were successful. On that level, they were successful. On an individual level, they failed Flat.
Speaker 1: Mister Besmaynoff has brought a series of slides with him that he has taken from the Soviet Union, and I think this is a good time to Take a look at the slides. Now, the viewers will be able to see these slides as we talk about them.
Speaker 0: Yes. This is a collection of slides, which are Some of them are, snapshots from my family album. Some of them are documents which I smuggled from the Soviet Embassy, And some are reproductions from local mass media. I usually show them to establish my credibility as a defector. This is a picture of my Native town, Matishya, about 20 miles north from Moscow.
Characteristically, there's a statue of comrade Lenin in the central square. This is myself at the age of 7, again, characteristically, under the statue of Comrade Stalin extending his friendly hand to Peoples of the world. At that age, of course, I was still idealistically minded young communist, And, I still believe that sooner or later, things will go for better, but I realized that the system stinks, That something is fishy and that ideology is is fake and the, propaganda about advanced Soviet agriculture simply didn't made the criteria of reality. If they talk about, abundance of food and and there's none in the stores, there must be something wrong. My father was he's on the left here.
My father was officer of the general staff of the Soviet Army. He was inspector of land forces, Soviet troops stationed in countries like Mongolia, Cuba, East European countries. Were he alive today, most likely, he would be inspecting Soviet troops in in Nicaragua, Angola, and many other parts of the world. Fortunately, he died, and he didn't see the disgrace because deep inside, he was Russian patriot. He didn't he didn't like the idea of expanding Soviet military might especially in the areas where where we were not welcomed at all.
Unlike many other military officers, he was reporting directly to the minister of defense bypassing KGB and diplomatic service. In other words, he was a trusted military professional, and my impression that this type of people are Much less hulkish and adventuristic than party bureaucrats in Kremlin. When American mass media described Soviet military as potentially dangerous counterpart for for Pentagon, I simply laugh because I know better. I know that the most dangerous part of the Soviet power structures are not military at all. Most likely, if they come to power in my country, there'll be more sensible Negotiators for nuclear disarmament and withdrawal of the Soviet troops from many parts of the world.
Speaker 1: But if someone from the Party structure or the KGB structure were to give the orders for a military They have to obey.
Speaker 0: They have to follow. They are professional military. But they you see the triangle of power and hate in USSR is the party at the top, the party elite, the oligarchy of the party, then the military and the KGB at the bottom. They hate each other, and, the most hated triangle, The most hated corner of the triangle is the Communist Party bureaucrats. They are the most adventuristic, Senile megalomaniacs.
They can start war. I wouldn't be surprised. Not the military. They know what war is. At least my father did.
This is the picture taken at the at the entrance of my Institute of Oriental Languages. It's a part of Moscow State University. I, graduated in 1963. And I
Speaker 1: Excuse me. Which one were you on?
Speaker 0: I I am on the right. You're on the right. And on the left is my My schoolmate, Vadim Svyarnov, who later was an apparatchik in the central committee of the Soviet Union Communist Party. What is an apparatchik? It's it's a it's a function.
It's something like civil service in British Empire. Some someone who is never fired from from the service. He stays there internally. He may not be promoted too high, but he's a dependable, bureaucrat who will stay forever. I studied not only languages, but also history, literature, even music.
I'm I'm on this picture, I'm trying to learn how to play musical, Indian musical instrument. I even tried to look like an Indian when I was 2nd years to
Speaker 1: Not bad, right?
Speaker 0: Yes. Actually, it was strongly encouraged by the by the instructors in my school because, this the graduates of my school were later on employed as diplomats, foreign journalists, or spies. As every Soviet student, I was, quote unquote, volunteering for harvesting grain in Kazakhstan. This is a a biggest, agricultural blunder of the Soviet government. But, I didn't have much choice, of course, because the communist motto borrowed from the Bible says, those who do not work shall not eat, and you can see me eating.
Therefore, I was working and you can see how happy I was about it. I went through a very extensive physical and military training, including the manure, and including the, military gains in in, areas, Suburban areas of Moscow. And here, for example, we are on the tour in Arkhangelsk area. And by the end of my training in school, I was recruited by the KGB. This picture was taken on that day, and you can see again how happy it feels to be recruited by the KGB.
Speaker 1: Our conversation with Yuri Alexandrovich Besmianov, who is a defector from the Soviet Union, a former propaganda agent for Novasty and the KGB, We'll continue after this message.
Speaker 0: Alright. As every student in USSR, I I went through very extensive physical and military training And civil defense training too. Unlike in United States, where civil defense is virtually nonexistent, 0. In USSR, every student, whatever is major subject has to go through very extensive 4 year military and civil defense training. You can see me here with a group of students during one of the war games near Moscow.
The main idea, of course, is to prepare a huge reserve army of of of the USSR. Each student has to to graduate as a junior lieutenant. In my case, it was administrative and military intelligence service. My first assignment was to India as a translator with the Soviet economical aid group building refinery complexes in Bihar state and Gujarat state. At that time, I was still naively, idealistically believing that what I was doing contributes to the understanding and cooperation between the nations.
It took me quite a number of years to realize that what we were bringing to India was a new type of colonialism, thousand times more oppressive and exploitative than any colonialism or imperialism in in history of mankind. But at that time, I was still hoping that, well, maybe it's not that bad, could be worse, and things may go for better, and I even try to implement the beautiful Marxist motto, proletarians of all the countries unite. I tried to unite with a nice Indian girl, and I was actually, I was fascinated by Indian culture, by by the family life in in this country. But, obviously, Communist Party had different plans for my genes, so I had to marry this beautiful Russian girl. In the span of my career, I married three times.
Most of these marriages were marriages of convenience on advice from the Department of Personnel. This is normal practice in USSR. The Soviet citizen is assigned to a foreign job, he has to be married either to keep family in USSR as hostages, Or if it's a convenience marriage like mine, so that the husband and wife are virtually informers on each other prevent defection or, contamination by decadent imperialist or capitalist ideas. In my case, I hated that girl so much that the moment I landed in Moscow, we, we were divorced and I, I married late a second time. By the end of my first assignment in India, I was promoted to the position of of public relation officer.
You can see me here Translating a speech by a Soviet boss.
Speaker 1: And you're on the right.
Speaker 0: I'm on the right here. Yes. And it was The occasion was commissioning of the refinery complex in Bihar, Baroni. Back in Moscow, I was immediately by Novasty Press Agency, which is a propaganda and ideological subversion front for the KGB. 75% of the members of the Novus Tea are commission officers of the KGB.
The other 25 are, like myself, co opted agents who are assigned to specific operations. In this particular case, you can see me talking to students of Lumumba Friendship University in Moscow. This is the unit a a huge school under the, direct control of the KGB and Central Committee where future leaders of the so called national liberation movements are being educated and selected carefully. And some of them have absolutely they neither this, for example, is a group of students from Lumumba. They don't look like students at all.
They look more like military, and that's exactly what they were. They were dispatched back to their countries to be leaders of the so called national liberation movements or to be translated into normal human language, Leaders of, international terrorist groups. Another, area of activity when I was working for the Novice team was to accompany groups of so called progressive intellectuals, writers, journalists, publishers, teachers, professors of of of colleges. You can see me here in Kremlin. I'm second on on the left with a group of Pakistani and Indian intellectuals.
Most of them pretend that they don't understand that, the we are actually working on behalf of the Soviet government and the KGB. They pretended that they are actually being guests, VIP intellectuals that they are treated according to their merits and and and their intellectual abilities. For us, they were just a bunch of political prostitutes to be taken advantage for various propaganda operations. Therefore, you can see perfectly well, the senior colleague of mine on the left doesn't really have that much respect on his face, And myself with a very skeptical smile, typical KGB sarcastic smile, anticipating Another victim of of ideological brainwashing. This is how a typical, conference in headquarters in Moscow look like.
Sitting in the middle is Boris Burkhov, the then director of Novasty press agency, high ranking party bureaucrat in the Department of Propaganda. I am standing next to a famous Indian poet, Panth, he was famous because he was an author. He was the author of a famous poem titled Rhapsody to Lenin. That's why he was invited to USSR, and everything was paid, by the Soviet government. Pay special attention to number of bottles on the table.
This is one of the ways to kill the awareness or curiosity of of foreign journalists. My one of my functions was to keep foreign guests permanently intoxicated the moment they land at Moscow Airport. I had to take them to the VIP launch and toast to friendship and understanding within the nations of the world, glass of vodka, then the second glass of vodka. And in no time, my guests would be feeling very happy. They would see everything in kind of pink, nice color, And, that's the way I I had to keep them permanently for the next 15 or 20 days.
At certain point in time, I had to withdraw alcohol from them so that some of them who are the most recruitable would feel a little bit shaky, guilty trying to remember what they were talking last night, that's the time to approach them with all kind of nonsense such as join communique or statement for for Soviet propaganda. That's the time they are in the most flexible. And, of course, what they didn't understand, they didn't realize or pretended not to realize that myself, who was drinking together with them, was not drinking at all. I had ways to get rid of alcohol through various techniques, including special pills, which were given to me by my colleagues, but they were taking it seriously. In other words, they they they would consume quite a large volumes of alcohol and feel quite uneasy next morning.
In 1967, the KGB attached me to this Magazine, Look Magazine, a group of 12 people arrived to USSR from United States to cover the 50th anniversary of October socialist revolution in my country. From the first page to the last page, it was a package of lies, propaganda cliche, which were presented to American readers as opinions and deductions of American journalists. Nothing could be far from truth. This were not opinions. They were not opinions at all.
They were the cliches which the Soviet propaganda wants American public to think that they think. Yeah. If it does make any sense at all, It sure does because from the viewpoint of the Soviet propaganda, although there are some subtle criticism of the Soviet system, the basic message is that Russia today is a nice functioning efficient system supported by majority of population. That's the biggest lie. And, of course, American intellectuals and journalists from Luke Magazine elaborated on that untruth in various different ways.
They intellectualized that lie. They found all kind of justifications for telling lies to American public.
Speaker 1: This is Excuse me, it was partly your job to make sure that they got these ideas and accepted them as their own ideas.
Speaker 0: Right. Actually, even before they arrived to USSR and they paid astronomical sum of money for that visit, They were submitted the this Novosy press agency developed so called backgrounders, 20, 25 pages of information and opinions, which were presented to the journalists even before they bought their tickets to Moscow. They had to analyze the situation, and judging on their reaction to that background, The local Mavista representative or local Soviet diplomat in Washington DC would assess whether they have whether they be given visa to USSR or not. They were selected at the time. They were they were preselected very carefully, and, there is not much chance for honest journalists to arrive to USSR and to stay there for 1 year and to bring this, package of lies back home.
This, for example, is a centerfold of the tie of of the Luke Magazine. They presented this monument erected by Communist Party in Stalingrad as the symbol personification of Russian military might. And they said in the article, which is published on on the side that Soviets are very proud of the victory in the 2nd World War. This is another big myth, A lie. Most sensible people would be proud to lose 20,000,000 of their countrymen in a war which was started by Genoese, Hitler, and comrade Stalin and paid by American multinationals.
Most of the Soviet citizens look at this type of monuments with disgust and sorrow because every family lost father, brother, sister, or child in the 2nd World War. Yet American journalists who were trying to appease to please their hosts presented this picture on the centerfold As the symbol and personification of Soviet national, they call it Russian national spirit. And it was greatest greatest misconception and and a very tragic misunderstanding. Of course, LOOK Magazine was not distributed in USSR. The main, audience was in United States.
But, I presume that many Americans, millions of Americans who were reading Luke Magazine at that time had absolutely wrong idea about the sentiments of my nation, about what the Soviets are proud of and what they hate. This is a group. You see the same lady with this ward In Stalingrad, this is the group of journalists. Myself is in the center with the same devilish smile, and mister Philip Harrington is on the Stream left there with with his camera. This is the gentleman which was so deaf or so uninterested in what I had to say to him.
This is the same picture, a blow up of the same of the same picture. Many many guests from various countries, in this particular case from Asia and Africa, were taken by me As a novice press agency employee, for a tour across Siberia, for example, we would show them Typical kindergarten, you see? Nothing special by American standards. Just nice children sitting, eating their breakfast or or lunch. What they could not understand or they pretended not to understand that this is an exemplary kindergarten.
This is not the kindergarten for every person or every family in USSR, and we maintain that illusion in their minds. You can see myself under the red spot in the middle there, with the same business like expression. I'm on you know, I'm doing my job. That That's what I'm assigned to do, and that's what I was paid to do. But deep inside, I still hope that at least some of these useful idiots would understand that What they are looking at has nothing to do with the level of affluence in my nation.
This is a better picture which reflects the true spirit of of the Soviet, Soviet childhood. This picture was printed in a Canadian government publication by mistake. In the middle, you can see children playing on a a small courtyard, and the caption goes, this is a typical kindergarten in Siberia. What these idiots didn't understand that it is not kindergarten at all. It is a prison for children of political prisoners, But there was not a single mentioning that what they were visiting actually was an area of concentration camps.
And the job of people like myself to help them to not to notice that they are actually talking to prisoners. Most of the children were dressed, especially on the occasion of the foreigners visit. The, of course, there were no corpses in on the ground. There were no machine gun guards, and, the well, it looks not very pleasant as you see. It's a it it looks dull, but, obviously, it does not create an impression This is actually a prison.
Speaker 1: Well, did any of the journalists have the curiosity to ask about The prisons and that kind of thing. They're in Siberia.
Speaker 0: This is
Speaker 1: what you associate.
Speaker 0: Yes. Some of them ask questions and naturally, we would give them for the stupid question, we give them stupid answer. No. There are no prisons in Siberia. No.
Most of the people who are who you see are free citizens of USSR. They are very happy to be here, and and they are contributing to the glory of the socialist system. Some of them pretended that They they believe what what I was telling them. And, most of them, we may discuss it later. What are the motivations of these people?
Why would they stubbornly bring lies to their own population through their own mass media? I have various answers So there's there's not a single explanation. It's a complex of explanations. It's fear, pure biological fear. They understand that they are on the territory of an enemy state, a police state.
And just to save their rotten skins and their miserable jobs, their affluence back home, They would prefer to tell a lie than to to ask truthful questions and and report truthful information. 2nd, most of these schmucks were afraid to lose their jobs because, obviously, if you tell truth about my country, you will not last long as a correspondent of New York Times or Los Angeles Times. They will fire you. What kind of correspondent are you? You obviously cannot find common language with Russians if they kick you out in 24 hours.
So just by by trying to be conformist to their own editorial bosses, They tried not to offend the sentiments of the Soviet administrators and people like myself. Deep inside, I hope they would insult my or offend by sentiment. Obviously, they prefer not to. Another reason, I did I I refuse to believe it, but, obviously, there is another reason. Obviously, it's agreed.
These people earn a lot of money When they come back to USA, they claim that they are experts on my country. They write books which sells a 1000000 copies title like Russians, the truth about Russia. Most of it is lie about Russia, yet they claim to be Sovietologists. They they bring they play back myth about my country, the propaganda cliches, yet they stubbornly resist, the word of truth. If a a person like Solzhenitsyn is either defecting or kicked out of USSR, they try all their best to to discredit him and to discourage him.
I don't have much chance to appear on national network, with a true story about my country. But a useful idiot like Kendrick Smith or Robert Kaiser, they are big heroes. They come back from USSR. They say, oh, we were talking to dissidents in Russia. Big deal.
Soviet dissidents are chasing American correspondents in the streets, and they are cowardly escaping from these contacts. For some strange reason, if you want to know more about Spain, you refer to Spanish writers. If you want to learn more about French, you read French or writers. Even about Antarctica, I bet you would read penguins. Only about the Soviet Union for some Strange reason, you read Hendrix and Schmendricks and all kind of Kysinger's because they claim that they know more about my country.
They know nothing or next to nothing, or they pretend that they know more than they actually do. I would say they are dishonest People who lack integrity and, common sense and intellectual honesty, they bring back all kind of stories like that. A kindergarten in Siberia. Meeting the most important fact, it's a prison for children of political prisoners. Another greatest example of monumental idiocy of American politicians.
Edward Kennedy was in Moscow, And he thought that he is a popular charismatic American politician who is easygoing, who can smile, dance at the wedding in in Russian Palace of Marriages. What he done what he did not understand, or maybe he pretended not to understand, that, Actually, he was being taken for a ride. This is a staged wedding especially to impress foreign media or or useful idiots like Ed Kennedy. Most of the of the guests there, they they they had security clearance, and they were instructed what to say to foreigners. This is exactly what I was doing.
You can see me in the same damn wedding palace In Moscow where Ed Kennedy was dancing here, you see smiling. He thinks he's very smart. From the viewpoint of Russian citizens who observe this idiocy, he He's he's narrow minded, egocentrical idiot who tries to earn his own popularity through the, through participation in propaganda farces like this. Here, you can see myself. On the right, again, exemplary Soviet bride.
On the left, 3 journalists from various countries, Asia, Africa, and Latin America, obviously, they enjoying They they will go back home and write the reports. We were present in the on a regular Soviet wedding. They were not present on a regular Soviet wedding. They were present. They were part of a farce of a circus performance.
Another thing which I had to sometimes risking my life to explain to foreigners. Time Magazine, for example, is very critical of South African racist regime. The whole article was dedicated to the shameful internal passport system where black blacks are not allowing to live with whites. For some strange reason, for the last 14 years since my defection, nobody wanted to pay attention to my passport. This is my This is my passport.
It also shows my nationality, and it it it has a police rubber stamp, which is called in Russian language, which assigns me to a certain area of residence. I cannot leave that area. Same way as this black man cannot leave the area in South Africa. Yet we call South African government racist regime. Not a single Jane Jane Shmanda or Fonda is brave enough, courageous enough to come to media and say, look.
This is what happens in USSR. I send a copy of of my passport to many American Liberals and civil rights, defenders and and all the other useful idiots, they never they never bothered to answer me back. This shows what kind of integrity, what kind of honesty these people are. They're a bunch of hypocrites because they don't want to recognize A good example of racism in my country. This is the first stage of befriending a professor.
Can see myself on the left with the same James Bond smile. On my on the right is my KGB supervisor, comrade Leonid Mitrokhin, And in the middle of professor of political science in Delhi University. The next stage would be to invite him to a gathering of In the Soviet Friendship Society, there he is sitting next to his wife before he is being sent to USSR for free trip. Everything is paid by the Soviet government. He was made to believe that he's invited to USSR because he's a talented, Sober thinking intellectual, absolutely false.
He's invited because he's a useful idiot because he would agree and subscribe to most of the Soviet propaganda cliche. And when he is coming back to to his own country, he is going for years years to teach the beauties of Soviet socialism to, newer and newer generations of his students, thus promoting the Soviet propaganda line. The KGB was even curious about this gentleman. It may look innocent. Maharishi Mahesh Yogi, a great spiritual leader or maybe a great charlatan and crook depending on which from which side you are looking at him.
Beatles were trained at his Ashram in Hadwar in India, how to meditate. Mia Farrow and and other, useful idiots from Hollywood visited his school, and they returned back to to United States absolutely zoned out of their minds with marijuana, Hashish and crazy ideas of meditation. To meditate, in other words, to isolate oneself from the current social and political issues of your own country to get into your own bubble, to forget about troubles of the world. Obviously, KGB was very fascinated with such a beautiful school, such a brainwashing center for stupid Americans. I was dispatched by the KGB to check what kind of VIP Americans attend this school
Speaker 1: at UNLV?
Speaker 0: Yes, I am on the left. I I I was trying to get enrolled in that school. Unfortunately, the Maharishi Mahesh Yogi asked too much. He wanted 500 American dollars for enrollment. But my function was not actually to get enrolled in the school.
My function was to discover what kind of people from United States attend this school. And we discovered that, yes, there are some influential members of family, public opinion makers of United States who come back with the crazy stories about Indian philosophy, Indians themselves look up upon them as idiots, useful idiots. To say nothing about KGB who looked at them as as as extremely naive, misguided people. Obviously, a VIP, say, a wife of of of a congressman or or a prominent Hollywood personality after the after being trained in that school is much more instrumental in the hands of of manipulators of public opinion and KGB than a normal person who who understands, who who who looks through this this, this this type of of, fake religious training.
Speaker 1: But why would they be more susceptible to manipulation?
Speaker 0: I just mentioned Because you see, a a person who is too much involved in in in introspective meditation. You see, if you carefully look what what Maharishi Mahesh Yogi is teaching to to Americans is that all most of the problems, Most of the burning issues of today can be solved simply by meditating. Don't don't don't rock the boat. Don't get involved. Just sit down, look at your navel, and meditate.
And the things due to some strange logic due to cosmic vibration will will will settle down by themselves. This is exactly what the KGB and Marxist Leninist propaganda wants from Americans, to distract their opinion, attention and mental energy from real issues of United States into a non issues, into a non world, non existent, harmony. Obviously, it's more beneficial for the Soviet aggressors to have a bunch of duped Americans than Americans who are self conscious, healthy, physically fit, and alert to to the reality. Maharishi Mahesh Yogi obviously is not on the payroll of the KGB. But whether he knows it or not, he contributes greatly to demoralization of American society.
And he's not the only one. There are hundreds of those gurus who come to you to your country to capitalize on naivete and stupidity of of Americans. It's a fashion. It's a fashion to meditate. It's a fashion not to be involved.
So, obviously, you can see that if if KGB were, That curious. If they paid my trip to Hadvar, if they assigned me to that to that strange job, obviously, they were very much fascinated. They were convinced that that type of of of brainwashing is very efficient and instrumental in demoralization of the United States.
Speaker 1: Our conversation with Yuri Alexandrovich Bezmynoff, who is a defector from the Soviet Union, a former propaganda agent for Novasty and the KGB, We'll continue after this message.
Speaker 0: This picture shows the part of the building of USSR Embassy and my supervisors. On the left is Comrade Meghdi, an Indian communist, and on the right, Most of the activity of that department was to compile huge amount volume of information All individuals who were instrumental in creating public opinion, publishers, editors, journalists, actors, educationalists, professors of political science, members of parliament, representatives of business circles. Most of these people were divided roughly in 2 groups. Those who would tow the Soviet foreign policy, they would be promoted to the positions of power through media and public opinion manipulation. Those who refuse the Soviet influence in their own country would be character assassinated or executed physically, convolution.
Same way as in a small town of Hue in South Vietnam. Several thousands of Vietnamese were executed in one night when the city was captured by Vietcong for only 2 days. An American CIA could never figure out how could possibly communists know each individual where he lives, where where to get him, and would be arrested in one night, basically, in some 4 hours before dawn, put on a van, taken out of the city limits, and shot. The answer is very simple. Long before communist occupied the city, there was extensive network of informers, Local Vietnamese citizens who knew absolutely everything about people who are instrumental in public opinion, including barbers and taxi drivers.
Everyone who is sympathetic to United States was executed. Same thing was done under the guidance of of the Soviet Embassy in Hanoi, and same thing I was doing in New Delhi. To my horror, I discovered that in the files where people were doomed to execution, there were names of of pro Soviet journalist with whom I was personally friendly.
Speaker 1: Pro Soviet.
Speaker 0: Yes. They were idealistically minded leftists who, made several visits to USSR. And yet the KGB decided that come revolution or drastic changes in political structure of India, they will have to go. Why is that? Because they know too much.
Simply because, you see, the useful idiots, the the leftists who are Idealistically believing in the beauty of Soviet socialist or communist of whatever system. When they get disillusioned, they become the worst enemies. That's why my KGB instructors specifically made the point, never bother with leftists. Forget about these political prostitutes. Aim higher.
This was my instruction. Try to get into into, large circulation, established conservative media, rich, filthy rich movie makers, intellectuals, so called academic circles, cynical, egocentric people who can look into your eyes with angelic expression and tell you a lie. These are the most recruitable people, people who lack moral principles who are either too greedy or too, suffer from self importance. They feel that, they they matter a lot. These are the people who KGB wanted very much to recruit.
Speaker 1: But to eliminate the others, to execute the others. Don't they serve some purpose? Wouldn't they be the
Speaker 0: ones you
Speaker 1: rely on?
Speaker 0: They serve purpose only at the stage of destabilization of a nation. For example, your leftists in in United States. All these professors and all these beautiful civil rights defender, they are instrumental in the process of the of the, subversion only to destabilize the nation. When their job is completed, they are non they are not needed anymore. They know too much.
Some of them, when when they get disillusioned, when they see that Marxist Lenin has come to power, obviously, they get offended. They think that they will come to power. That will never happen, of course. They will be lined up against the wall and shot, but they may turn into the most bitter enemies of Marxist Leninists when they come to power. And that's what happened in Nicaragua.
You remember most of these, former Marxist Leninists were either put to prison Or one of them split, and now he's working against Sandinistas. It happened in in, Grenada when Maurice Bischoff was. He was already a Marxist. He was executed by by a new Marxist who was more Marxist than this Marxist. Same happened in Afghanistan when, first, there was Taraki.
He was killed by Amin. Then Amin was killed by Babrakar Mal with the help of KGB. Same happened in in Bangladesh when Munjibur Rahman, very pro Soviet leftist was assassinated by his own Marxist Leninist military comrades. It's the same pattern everywhere. The moment They serve their purpose.
All the useful idiots are used either be executed entirely, all the idealistically minded Marxist, or, exiled or put in prisons like in Cuba. Many, many former Marxists are in Cuba, in in prison. So most of the Indians who were cooperating with the Soviets, especially without, the Department of of, information of the USSR embassy were listed for execution. And when I discovered that fact, Of course, I was sick. I was mentally and physically sick.
I thought that I'm I'm going to explode one day during the briefing at the ambassador's office, I would stand up and say something that we are basically a bunch of murderers. That's what we are. We it has nothing to do with friendship and understanding between the nation and blah blah blah. We are murderers. We behave as as bunch of thugs in in a country which which is hospitable to us, a country which which with ancient traditions.
But I I I did not defect. I tried to get the message across to my horror. Nobody wanted even to listen, least of all to believe what I had to say. And I tried all kind of tricks. I would I would I would, leak information through letters, or lost documents or something like that.
And still, I got no message. The message was not published Even in the conservative mass media of of India, the immediate impulse to defect was Bangladesh crisis, which was described by American correspondence As Islamic Grassroot Revolution, which is absolute baloney, there was nothing to do with Islam, and there was no Grassroot Revolution. Actually, there are no Grassroot Revolutions, period. Any revolution is a byproduct of a highly organized group, of conscientious and professional Organizers, but it has nothing to do with grassroots. In Bangladesh, it was nothing with grassroots.
Most of the, Avami League party members, Avami League means people's party, were trained in Moscow in the high party school. Most of the Muqtifawje leaders Muqtifawje is in Bengali means people's army, same as SWAPO and and all kind of liberation armies all over the world, the same bunch of useful idiots. They were trained at Lumumba University and various centers of the KGB in Semferopol, in in Crimea, and in Tashkent. So when I saw that India Indian territory is being used as a as a jumping board to destroy East Pakistan, I saw myself, thousands of of so called students, traveling through India to East Pakistan, through the territory of India, And Indian government pretended not to see what what's going on. They knew perfectly well.
The Indian police knew it. The intelligence department of Indian government knew it. The KGB, of course, knew it, and the CIA knew it. That that was most infuriating because when I defected and I explained to the CIA debriefers, They should watch out because East Pakistan is going to erupt any moment. They said I was I was reading too many James Bond novels.
Anyway, so East Pakistan was doomed. One of my colleagues in the Soviet consulate in Calcutta, when he was dead drunk, he ventured into the basement to to relieve himself. And he found the big boxes, which said printed matter to Dhaka University. Dhaka is a capitalist, Pakistan. And since he was drunk and curious, he opened one of the boxes, and he discovered not printed metric.
He discovered Kalashnikov guns and ammunition in there. Anyway, it's a long story. When I saw the the preparations for the for the, invasion into East Pakistan, obviously, I wanted to defect immediately. The only thing I couldn't I couldn't at that time, make up my mind when and where and how. One of the reasons, of course, you see, I was In love with India, I mentioned it before.
I spoke the languages. I socialized with people, and I understood that I had to to act fast unless I want this beautiful country to be permanently and irreparably damaged by our presence. One of the reasons not to defect was, as you can see, I was living in relative affluence. Who the hell in in in a normal mind would defect And do what? To be abused by your media?
To be called McCarthyist and fascist and paranoid? Or to drive a taxi in New York City? What 4, what the hell for should I defect? To be abused by by Americans, to be insulted in exchange for for my effort to bring the truthful information about Intending dangerous subversion. As you can see, I was living in quite a comfortable conditions next to swimming pool where Indians were not allowed, by the way.
I was highly paid expert in propaganda. I had my family. I was respected by my nation. My career was cloudless. The third reason, how to defect with the family?
To defect with the baby and the wife would be virtual suicide because according to law, that hypocritical law which I quoted before, the Indian police will have to hand me over back to the KGB, and that will be the end of my defection and probably my life. Again, I cannot smuggle my wife because she was not quite sure what what I was doing. She was not that idealistically involved, and she was definitely not in in in the total picture of what I was doing for the KGB. She would be shocked If I if I, you know, put her in my van and and drive her to American embassy or elsewhere, that would be a greatest danger. So, again, I had to defect in such a way that my defection would look as simple disappearance.
And there were many cases like that When the Soviet agents simply disappeared, either killed in action or thanks to their curiosity and and their close contacts with radicals. Some of them were killed by the Marxists, by the way. It happened in many African countries when the Soviet KGB were killed by themselves, not because they hated Marxists and Leninists, but because they were simply trigger happy bunch of unruly characters. If you give them machine gun, they will shoot. And some of the Soviets obviously were not careful enough to protect themselves, and they got into embarrassing situations when they were Shot at the crossfire between factions of of so called liberation movements.
Anyway, so I I decided, as I said, to study the, counterculture. I decided this probably would be the best way to disappear. I socialized with characters like this on the left. You see, he's a barefoot American hippie. It took me quite a long time to study exactly what they were doing and how to mix with them, But, eventually, I did.
Most of Indian newspapers carried my picture and promise of 2,000 rupees for information about my whereabouts. But they were looking for wrong person because they obviously tried to stop, young Soviet diplomat in White shirt and tie, and this is how I looked at the time of defection. Nobody could possibly think that the Soviet diplomat be as crazy as to join a bunch of hippies. That's you. Try yes.
Travel India and smoke ash. So I made it Literally, it it almost like a Hollywood style, detective story. From under the nose of the KGB The in Bombay Airport, I landed the plane, and I flew to to Greece where I was debriefed by the CIA. That's basically most That's all for my slides.
Speaker 1: We can turn off the projector. And that's very interesting. Well, you spoke several times Before about ideological subversion, that is a phrase that, I'm afraid some Americans don't fully understand.
Speaker 0: When
Speaker 1: The Soviets used the phrase ideological subversion. What do they mean by it?
Speaker 0: Ideological subversion is is the process which is legitimate, overt, and open. You you can see it with your own eyes. All all you have to do, all American mass media has to do is to unplug their bananas from their ears, open up their eyes, and they can see it. There is no mystery. There is nothing to do with espionage.
I know that espionage intelligence gathering looks more romantic. It sells more deodorants through the advertising, probably. That's why Your Hollywood producers are so crazy about James Bond type of of of thrillers. But in reality, The main emphasis of the KGB is not in the area of intelligence at all. According to my opinion and opinion of many defectors of my caliber, only about 15% of time, money, and manpower is spent on espionage as such.
The other 85% is a slow process, which we call either ideological subversion or active measures, in the language of of the KGB or psychological warfare. What it basically means is To change the perception of reality of every American to such an extent that despite of the abundance of information, No one is able to come to sensible conclusions in the interest of defending themselves, their families, their community, and their country. It's a great brainwashing, process, which goes very slow, and it's divided in in 4 basic stages. The first one being demoralization. It takes from 15 to 20 years to demoralize a nation.
Why that many years? Because this is the minimum number of years which requires to, educate 1 generation of students in the country of of of your enemy exposed to the ideology of the enemy. In other words, Marxism Leninism ideology is being pumped into the soft heads of of of at least 3 generations of American students without being challenged or counterbalanced by the basic values of Americanism, American patriotism. The result the result you can see, most of the people who graduated in sixties, Dropouts or half baked intellectuals are now occupying the positions of power in the government, civil service, business, mass media, educational system. You are stuck with them.
You cannot get rid of them. They are contaminated. They are programmed to think and react to certain stimuli in a certain pattern. You cannot change their mind even if you if you expose them to authentic information. Even if you prove that white is white and black is black.
You still cannot change the basic perception and the logic of behavior. In other words, these people, The process of demoralization is complete and irreversible. To get rid society of these people, you need another 20 or 15 years to educate a new generation of patriotically minded and common sense people who would be acting in favor and in the interests of the United States society.
Speaker 1: And yet these people who've been programmed and, as you say, in place and who are favorable to an opening with the Soviet concept, These are the very people who would be marked for extermination in this country?
Speaker 0: Most of them, yes. Simply because the psychological shock, When when they will see in future what the what the beautiful society of equality and social justice means in practice, obviously, they will revolt. They they they will, they they will be very unhappy, frustrated people. And the Marxist Leninist regime does not tolerate these people. They, obviously, they will join the links of dissenters dissidents.
Speaker 1: Yes.
Speaker 0: Unlike in present United States. There will be no place for dissent in in future Marxist Leninist America. Here, you can you can get popular like, Daniel Ellsberg and filthy rich like Jane Fonda for being dissident for criticizing your Pentagon. In future, these people will be simply squashed like cockroaches. Nobody is going to pay them nothing for their beautiful, noble ideas of equality.
This, they don't understand, and, it will be greatest shock for them, of course. The demoralization process in the United States is basically completed already for the last 25 years. Actually, it's overfulfilled because demoralization now reaches such areas where previously, not even Comradhan Dropov and and all his experts would would even dream of such a tremendous success. Most of it is done by Americans to Americans, thanks to lack of moral standards. As I mentioned before, exposure to true information does not matter anymore.
A person who was demoralized is unable to assess true information. The facts tell nothing to him. Even if I shower him with information, with with authentic prove with documents, with pictures. Even if I take him by force to the Soviet Union and show him concentration camp, he will refuse to believe it until he he's going to receive a kick in the in his fat bottom. When a military boot crashes his, Then he will understand, but not before that.
That's the tragic of the situation of demoralization. So, basically, America is stuck with with demoralization. And unless even if if you start right now, here, this minute, you start educating new generation of American, It will still take you 15 to 20 years to turn the tide of, of ideological perception of reality back to normal normalcy and and patriotism. The next stage is destabilization. This time, subverter does not care about your ideas and the patterns of your consumption.
Whether you eat junk food and get fat and flabby, it doesn't matter anymore. This time, and it takes only from 2 to 5 years to destabilize a nation, it's what matters is essentials, economy, foreign relations, defense systems. And you can see it quite clearly that in some areas, in such sensitive areas as as, defense and economy. The influence of Marxist Leninist ideas in the United States is Absolutely fantastic. I could never believe it 14 years ago when I landed, in this part of the world that the process will go that fast.
The next stage, of course, is crisis. It it it may take only up to 6 weeks to to bring a country to the verge of crisis. You can see it in in Central America now. And after crisis with a violent change of power, structure and economy, you have so called the period of normalization. It may last indefinitely.
Normalization is a cynical expression borrowed from Soviet propaganda. When the Soviet tanks moved into Czechoslovakia in 'sixty 8, Comrade Brezhnev said, Now the situation in brotherly Czechoslovakia is normalized. This is what will happen in United States if you allow all the schmucks to bring the country to crisis, to promise people all kind of goodies and the paradise on Earth, to destabilize your economy, to eliminate the principle of free market competition and to put a big brother government in Washington DC with the benevolent dictators like Walter Mondale, who will promise lots of thing. Never mind whether the promises are fulfillable or not. He will go to Moscow to kiss the bottoms of of new generation of Soviet assassins.
Never mind. He will create false illusions that The situation is under control. Situation is not under control. Situation is disgustingly out of control. Most of the American politicians, Media and educational system trains another generation of people who think they are living at a peacetime.
False. United States is in the state of war, undeclared total war against the basic principles and the foundations of this system. And the initiator of this war is not comrade D'Andropov, of course. It's it's the system. However ridiculous it may sound, the world communist system or the world communist conspiracy, whether I scared.
Some people are not. I don't give a hoot. If if you are not scared by now, nothing can scare you. But you don't have to be paranoid about it. What what actually happens now that unlike myself, you have Literally, several years to live on unless United States wake up.
The the time bomb is ticking. With every second, The disaster is coming closer and closer. Unlike myself, you will have nowhere to defect to unless you want to live in This is it. This is the last country of freedom and and possibility.
Speaker 1: Okay. So what do we do? What is your recommendation to the American people?
Speaker 0: Well, the the the immediate thing that comes to my mind is, of course, there must be a very strong national effort to educate people in in in the spirit of real patriotism, number 1. Number 2, to to explain them the real danger of socialist, communist, whatever, welfare state, big brother government. If people will fail to grasp the impending danger of that development, nothing ever can help United states you may kiss goodbye to your freedom, including freedoms to to homosexuals, to prison inmate. All this freedom will vanish, evaporating in 5 seconds, including your precious lives. The second thing, I the moment at least part of United States population is convinced that the danger is real.
They have to force their government. And I'm not talking about sending letters, signing petitions, and all this beautiful noble activity. I am talking about forcing United States government to stop aiding communism Because there is no other problem more burning and and urgent than to stop the Soviet military industrial complex from destroying what is whatever is left of the free world. And it is very easy to do. No credits, no technology, No money, no political or diplomatic recognition, and, of course, no such EDS as grain deals to USSR.
The Soviet people, 270,000,000 of of Soviets, will be eternally thankful to you if you stop aiding A bunch of murderers who sit now in Kremlin and whom President Reagan respectfully calls government. They do not govern anything, least of all such complexity as the Soviet economy. So basic 2 2 very simple, maybe too simplistic answers or solutions. But never nevertheless, they are the only solutions. Educate yourself.
Understand what's going on around you. You are not living at the time of peace. You are in a state of war, and you have precious little time to save yourself. You don't have much time, especially if you are talking about young generation. There's not much time left for convulsions to the beautiful, disco music.
Very soon, it will go just just overnight. If we are talking about capitalists or or or wealthy businessmen, they I think they are selling the rope on which they will hang very soon. If they don't stop, if they cannot curb their unsettled desire for profit, and if they keep on trading with the monster of the Soviet communism, They are going to hang very soon, and it they will pray to be killed. But, unfortunately, they will be sent to Alaska probably to manage industry of slaves. It's it's simplistic.
I know it sounds unpleasant. I know Americans don't like to listen to things which are unpleasant, But I have defected not to tell you the stories about such idiocy as as microfilm James Bond type espionage. This is garbage. You don't need any espionage anymore. I have come to talk about survival.
It's a question of survival of this system. You may ask me, what is it in for me? Survival, obviously. Because unlike I as I said, I am now in your boat. If if we sing together, we'll sing beautifully together.
There is no other place on this planet to be fact
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared a post about Candace Owens discussing how Legacy Media creates false narratives and mass psychosis, referencing an intriguing CIA experiment. I truly believe she makes more sense than most people today—she's a real warrior in this fight.
@BGatesIsaPyscho - Concerned Citizen
“Square square square square” Listen to Candace Owens @RealCandaceO explain in 60 seconds how the Legacy Media form false narratives & mass psychosis formation. She describes a fascinating CIA experiment. For me @RealCandaceO speaks more sense than almost anyone else on the planet right now - what a warrior 👏
Video Transcript AI Summary
The CIA conducted an experiment with 17 agents and one civilian, showing them a triangle but telling them to say it was a square. The agents all complied, causing the civilian to doubt their own perception. This is compared to how the media influences people to believe what they are told, even if it goes against reason. The message is to recognize the government's wrongdoing and wake up to reality.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: CIA, back in the day, did this experiment where they placed 18 people in a room. 17 of those people were actually CIA agents, and one of them was just an unwitting member of the public. So the person that was running the experiment showed every single person in the room a picture of a triangle. It's very clearly a picture of a triangle, and he asked every person in the room to simply state what they saw on the picture. Well, despite it clearly being a triangle, all of the agents were instructed to say square.
So imagine you're in this room, you're talking to other people, you think that you're all off the side of the street, and they start going around. And everyone says, oh, what is that? A square. A square. What do you see?
A square. A square. A square. A square. But by the time it gets to you and you're the 18th person, you're going, oh, am I crazy?
I see a triangle. And guess what that 18th person said? Well, they said square because they didn't wanna be the crazy person in the room. That is exactly how the media works. They are the agents in the room that are repeating square, square, square, square, square until you're supposed to just completely abandon reason and just join them and say, yeah.
No. Yeah. No. Totally. That's that's the square.
You have to come to terms with the fact that our government is evil. Our government has done tremendously evil things. They will continue to do that until we wake up.
@DefiyantlyFree - Insurrection Barbie
“American people are the most propagandized people in the whole world and they don’t even know it.” This clip is brutally honest. https://t.co/eG8HsY7Rxg
Video Transcript AI Summary
Americans are heavily propagandized, often unaware of it. Unlike people in countries like China or the old Soviet Union, Americans believe they are receiving the truth from cable news. It's concerning when prominent figures like Sean Hannity and Rachel Maddow echo the same narratives. Those who speak out against the war machine, like Julian Assange, face consequences for telling the truth. Many accept what they see on news without question. The shift in the Democratic Party is evident; at the recent convention, there was a lack of critical thought, with attendees cheering for billionaires and the war machine. Conversations reveal a troubling indifference to the party's actions, such as the treatment of Kamala Harris and the dismissal of dissenting voices. The focus on issues like abortion seems superficial, reflecting a deeper disconnect within the party.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Americans are the most propagandized people in the entire world, and they don't have any idea that they are. You know, at least people in China know they're being propagandized. The people in the old Soviet Union knew it was propaganda. People in America turn on Anderson Cooper, turn on, Rachel Maddow, Sean Hannity. They think they're getting the truth.
They really do. They think, you know, hey. Don't you think it's a little weird when Sean Hannity and Rachel Maddow are saying the exact same thing about Ukraine? Don't you think that's weird?
Speaker 1: Well, yes. In fact, I did. It's funny you mentioned that.
Speaker 0: Yeah. And so, you know, I try to remind people that, you know, that you got fired not because you were going along with the wars and telling the lies of the wars. When you were going along with the Iraq war, they couldn't give you enough TV shows. Right? You were on CNN.
You MSNBC. Your number one guest was Rachel Maddow, then you had the number one show on Fox. It was when you started to tell the truth. They don't fire you for lying about wars. They don't they fire you for telling the truth about the wars, and that's just same reason why Julian Assange was in prison.
He wasn't in prison because he lied about the war machine. He was in prison because he told the truth. And that's what people need to realize. And I try to I ask people when I have these conversations with my old liberal friends from Hollywood, the ones who still talk to me, and I'll say, is there anything you hear on cable news that you don't believe? Is there anything?
And you know what? They never say anything back. They never say, well, I don't believe that. They never say anything. They just change the subject or move on to something else.
Speaker 2: You really think they're just accepting the whole sandwich? Yes. Just swallowing without chewing.
Speaker 0: Just Yes. And that was the, you know, beginning of the end for me was, when I wouldn't go along with Hillary Clinton because I was a big I've always been a liberal progressive, and, I supported Bernie Sanders. I thought we were really close to doing something. At that convention in 2016 in Philadelphia, I was there, and you walked into the convention hall, and half the people in there wanted to overthrow the democratic establishment. Half the people there wanted to get corporate money out of politics, and there was lots of friction.
They were turning the lights out. They were using sound can. It was and it really felt like we were about to do something. Right? And then I went to the last convention just this year in Chicago, and it was like a stepford's wife's convention.
It was brainwashed, brain dead, go alongs. Nobody had a a thought in their head. Nope. There was there's cheering on billionaires and cheering on the war machine, and it was grown. CIA director.
Bill billionaires on stage from from, you know, Oprah talking about how she's a victim of sexism and racism. That was one of the funniest things. That's like, Oprah, since I've been in college, she's been a highly touted celebrity with her own television show. There might have been a time in her life when she was discriminated against, but, boy, she certainly made up for it. And for her to be the voice of that was really disgusting.
And then you had, you know, Pritzker come on stage. I'm a real billionaire, and people are cheering like, is this the Democratic Party? The Democratic Party And so that's what happened with Bill Clinton. They treat
Speaker 2: you, by the way, at the convention?
Speaker 0: I couldn't stay there a lot. I had a pass to be on the floor. It honestly, it depressed me, to the point of almost tears, and I would go up to people. I would go up to delegates, and I would say, does it bother you that the the the party who's putting democracy on the ballot, throughout 14,000,000 ballots and installed Kamala Harris. And to a person, they would all say there was a process.
She followed the process. They didn't care. Nobody cared. They don't care anything. They didn't care that she didn't get a vote.
They don't care that they threw out the guy who did get a vote. They don't care that they were lied to about his mental, his dementia for years. They didn't mind. Nothing. Nothing.
And they were all about it was the only it was and they talk about abortion at the convention like it's a day it's like it's Christmas. And, you know, like, hey. I'm I I always, you know, like Bill Lib Lib the old Liberals, I always was like, you know, let's let's make, abortion safe, legal, and rare.
reSee.it AI Summary
I discuss the use of pulsed light for special diagnoses and express concerns about trust in centralized science, questioning the validity of studies with inadequate sample sizes or durations. I reflect on lessons from COVID, emphasizing the need for truth over political correctness. I urge others to embrace curiosity and take action for change. I highlight the detrimental effects of modern living on health and the importance of natural light. Lastly, I prepare for a talk in El Salvador about embracing chaos and discovery in nature.
@DrJackKruse - ☣️ Pleb Kruse = BTC foundationalist in exile 🟩🔆
Pulsed light or continuous light 📷 ¿In a controversy? For special diagnoses, I have specified regimens I use pulsed red light for my patients. #PBM/LLLT https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2933784/
Effect of Pulsing in Low-Level Light Therapy
Low level light (or laser) therapy (LLLT) is a rapidly growing modality used in physical therapy, chiropractic, sports medicine and increasingly in mainstream medicine. LLLT is used to increase wound healing and tissue regeneration, to relieve pain ...
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
@DrJackKruse - ☣️ Pleb Kruse = BTC foundationalist in exile 🟩🔆
2. Why is trust gone in centralized science? If a study size is less than the incidence of a known adverse event, how can it be concluded that the adverse event does not occur? If a study length is less than the timeframe for known potential adverse events, how can it be concluded that longterm adverse events do not occur? The are using methodology to build their case. It isn’t science. It is propaganda of the profiteering agenda.
@DrJackKruse - ☣️ Pleb Kruse = BTC foundationalist in exile 🟩🔆
3. What was the primary lesson from COVID regarding the DoD and the government's centralized experts? “Trust the science” just equaled elaborate gaslighting. Just thank god Charles Lieber got busted for selling his nanobot ideas to CCP. If not COVID really might have been a kill shot.
@DrJackKruse - ☣️ Pleb Kruse = BTC foundationalist in exile 🟩🔆
4. Everyone forgot this, but in the podcast I did yesterday at THE RIPPLE EFFECT I explain it all.
@DrJackKruse - ☣️ Pleb Kruse = BTC foundationalist in exile 🟩🔆
5. If it only takes two days in nature to repair what your job and home life destroy, will you take the plunge into nature? https://www.bbc.com/news/amp/health-38826127
Weekend camping resets body clock - BBC News
Time outdoors helps sleep but scientists say you could benefit at home by using more natural light.
bbc.com
@DrJackKruse - ☣️ Pleb Kruse = BTC foundationalist in exile 🟩🔆
6. Most are apathetic and nihilistic today. Do not be like most. Ride your curiosity. When you see something you can make better do that. The world needs more people like this. https://t.co/jqVQedS0Cx
@DrJackKruse - ☣️ Pleb Kruse = BTC foundationalist in exile 🟩🔆
7. Data shows coins are leaving exchanges. Even at $98k, with conviction long-term, HODLers aren't selling. This makes #Bitcoin a unique asset. In bull cycles, #Gold production doubles to meet demand. $BTC can't DOUBLE. In fact, it HALVES its supply making it anti-gold. The price must rise exponentially to compensate as a result. The ride has not even begun. This blog, I wrote the day Bitcoin crossed 18K four years ago, makes the cases of why health & wealth are linked. https://www.patreon.com/posts/44147474
@DrJackKruse - ☣️ Pleb Kruse = BTC foundationalist in exile 🟩🔆
8. Good mitochondrial health goes against most of the centralized foundations of society, .. It can't really be fixed, our very cities are built to destroy our health slowly. Health is the slowest form of death we can muster. It's one of the master contradictions today. Our lifestyles, the large motorways, and paths laid in front of us by society are ruining our health. (and I think it will collapse eventually, as society needs enough healthy people to function well) It goes deep: -We're living indoors, outside of the sun's reach, under artificial light(LEDs, fluos, incandescent, screens, etc) all the time instead of being out in the sunlight during the day and sleeping early in the dark at night. (thus, we ruin decentralized circadian health and time stamping controls, and mitochondrial biology) -When we go outside, we use clothes, and (sun)glasses instead of exposing our eyes and skin. Cities' geoengineering and lighting block most of the good sunlight, making us bathe in bad artificial light. Bad electromagnetic fields block the earth's magnetism with asphalt. This is why, for the first time ever, longevity in cities is dropping globally. -We are exposed to a quintillion 10^18 times the natural background levels of electromagnetic fields which are now even used as weapons! Yup, toxic energy it is! -We drink shit fluoridated tap water -We breathe shitty polluted air, and the pollution also blocks the sunlight! -We get chronically stressed from all the movement around us, and the noise pollution! -We are sleep deprived of using devices that wake us up brutally. -We don't feel cold or hot anymore, we are all too comfortable in our cozy homes. -We use rubber soled shoes and stay in flats so we don't sense the earth's natural magnetic fields anymore. We stopped demanding leather soled shoes. -Our diets are massively artificial: full of food made in factories, coming from anywhere in the world, full of sugar, processed oils, glyphosate, etc. (and the list can be a book by itself). -We never fast even after dinner to breakfast. Every light we put on at night is like eating a sugary snack which raises our blood glucose and insulin. -We are all too sedentary when it was the norm to walk a few miles a day even a century ago. -We are all chronically way too stressed which ruins POMC biology, destroys melanin sheets and drives our sympathetic nervous system to create phenotypic illness. -Do I need to tell you about drug and cigarette consumption links to nnEMF exposure? -Do I need to tell you about the 1000s of toxic compounds made by industry in the last 75 years alone? Our bodies are very resilient, and we can remain well for a while, but eventually, we fall apart and have to go to the pharmacy. That is the Big design of BigHarma to harvest us for cash. The centralized doctors are taught this model from BigHarma curriculum the banker families gave them in 1911 Flexner report so we are all consitioned to ask them for a magic pill or Rx... But they can't repair the harm we self inflict to ourselves because the governments, bankers and corporations built a toxic environment to inhabit to profit from because our governments are corrupt - they won't admit it, but they sure love profiting from it and selling us a magic pill - and we're stupid enough to believe it because it's easy. The blue light screens create the situation of lowered dopamine and low melatonin and as this occurs their drive thru algorithm lifestyle seem to be what we want and seek, and we don't want to hear the truth: what we actually need: a better environment where we can breathe and get sunshine and darkness without bathing in toxic energy, good food, and good habits, and why not a fulfilling life, too? Unless we fix that, our lives will be shortened, our happiness and well-being will lessened, and our health will fluctuate. My quantum/natural health perspective
@DrJackKruse - ☣️ Pleb Kruse = BTC foundationalist in exile 🟩🔆
9. More on how man-made light ages you faster via melanopsin damage by lowering melatonin #ALAN and accelerated #aging - Get #naturallight in the day! - Block #artificiallight at night! Do you want to slow down or speed up your aging? Either way, you better learn how #melatonin distribution works.
@DrJackKruse - ☣️ Pleb Kruse = BTC foundationalist in exile 🟩🔆
10. Do not be politically correct. TELL THE TRUTH. Make it hurt. It is the only path to wisdom. “The greatest threat to civil liberties in Canada is political Correctness.” John Sopinka, Former Supreme Court Judge of Canada https://t.co/lDlPLTeqmy
@DrJackKruse - ☣️ Pleb Kruse = BTC foundationalist in exile 🟩🔆
11. When life hasn’t got a swing anymore, people may give in to obsessive oniomaniac compulsions before they change for the better. If you sincerely feel that there is a need to change something in the world, go ahead and satisfy that need. No one is stopping you but you. https://t.co/3tLmDgGFXr
@DrJackKruse - ☣️ Pleb Kruse = BTC foundationalist in exile 🟩🔆
12. Often times it is a bit frustrating to be a seed planter and know things at least 20 years ahead of the crowd. But it is satisfying when you've waited your whole life for something like COVID to come along to awaken the sleeping. It is an enormous privilege to see the seeds sprout and germinate.
@DrJackKruse - ☣️ Pleb Kruse = BTC foundationalist in exile 🟩🔆
13. THIS BLOG ON QUANTUM BIOLOGY is for the holiday time when you teach the sleeping members of your family a new thing. You can use this one to sample your family members on Thanksgiving and see who has the highest risk of getting ill. If I told you earwax can do this, would you believe it? If not, this interesting video blog is for you. VOC are in vapes. People who vape create problems for their ears in ways they do not know. Vapes make you more sensitive to ear pod damage. Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are organic chemicals with high vapor pressure at ordinary room temperature. Their high vapor pressure results from a low boiling point, which causes large numbers of molecules to evaporate or sublimate from the liquid or solid form of the compound and enter the surrounding air, a trait known as volatility. This allows mammals to communicate via smell. What do smells mean to us? It means a lot. Did you know one of the major VOCs in human earwax are Vitamin A and CoEnzyme Q10? When earwax has a ton of these two chemicals, it tells the clinician at the Kruse Longevity Center something deep about the person's environmental exposure to 4G and 5G. Did you know that? Some naturally occurring VOCs are from the family of isoprenoids. These quantum biochemicals include carotene, phytol, RETINOL (vitamin A), tocopherol (vitamin E), dolichols, and squalene. Squalene is important in cholesterol biology. Did you know that? Heme A has an isoprenoid tail, too, and it is destroyed by blue light. The same thing is true of lanosterol, the sterol precursor in mammals, which is derived from squalene and, hence, from isoprene. This links cerumen production to pregnenolone steal syndrome. Did you know that? The functional isoprene units in biological systems are dimethylallyl pyrophosphate (DMAPP) and its isomer isopentenyl pyrophosphate (IPP), which are used in the biosynthesis of naturally occurring isoprenoids such as carotenoids, quinones, lanosterol derivatives (e.g., steroids) and the prenyl chains of certain compounds (e.g., phytol chain of chlorophyll). Yes, even leaves release VOCs via their stomata in plants, telling animals about their own stress levels. https://www.patreon.com/posts/22854189
@DrJackKruse - ☣️ Pleb Kruse = BTC foundationalist in exile 🟩🔆
14. Sunlight creates the shape of water and forms a stage for life. The sun makes water a chameleon for innovation. When life is on this stage and when the living becomes afraid, you know there's a big problem in the world. The decentralized Library of Nature is a shrine in the Earth's crust and ionosphere to living things. These relics were our ancestors who worshiped Nature. Today's iteration of our species has lost this true virtue and now suffers from its own delusion of power we call progress. How easily we convince ourselves that we need to cover up what we were born to be. What a fallacy. We've become imposters of our natural directives and will likely become a new relic in nature's library of failed creations in the Earth's crust.
@DrJackKruse - ☣️ Pleb Kruse = BTC foundationalist in exile 🟩🔆
15. Now the lesson is over. I have to prepare for my talk today for the pioneers coming to El Salvador who want to embrace some chaos to embark on a new journey of freedom and discovery. @nayibbukele Nature is not emotional about her methods. To those with sentiments, they think nature is ruthless. Being sentimental or emotional will make you susceptible to lies and misjudgment. Nature has none of these worries. Thoughts are ghosts of emotions.
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared insights from Sasha Latypova on how COVID-19 was framed as a pandemic in the U.S. She argues it was a military operation involving the Department of Defense, which allegedly manipulated the narrative and response. Latypova highlights the absence of confirmed patient zero cases and claims that hospital protocols led to significant deaths, attributing these to harmful treatments rather than the virus itself. She questions the motives behind the pandemic response, suggesting it was a cover-up for deeper issues within the U.S. security state.
@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor
This is the REAL STORY of how COVID started in the U.S.—Don't let Deep State shills like Kash Patel gaslight you (1/17 - supporting evidence in thread) "[COVID wasn't] a pandemic. It [was] a military attack. It [was] a deployment of chemical [and] maybe radiological weapons." Retired pharma R&D executive Sasha Latypova (@sasha_latypova) describes for Mic Meow (@MicMeowed) how the COVID "pandemic" was actually pulled off in the U.S., highlighting the U.S. military's involvement in the release of a biological (and potentially radiological) weapon, the lack of evidence supporting the existence of a patient zero in the U.S. (or even China), and the rollout of "hospital murder protocols," which were used to generate the deaths needed to make it look like there was a "pandemic" occurring. "The Department of Defense quickly took over the response to the supposed public health event [i.e., the COVID-19 'pandemic']," Latypova notes at the beginning of the clip, before delving into the timeline of events—which is strongly supported by the available evidence. "The [supposed SARS-CoV-2 'virus'] sequence was posted into GenBank on January 9th, 2020, ostensibly from a Chinese patient[, for whom there is no evidence supporting their existence]." (See tweet 5/17 for supporting evidence of Latypova's claim here.) "The [supposed SARS-CoV-2 'virus'] sequence was posted into GenBank on January 9th [2020]. On January 30th [2020], the CDC claimed that we have a first person in the United States, in Washington State, who was, again, infected with this virus. Again, [there was no] evidence of this person ever existing." (See tweet 4/17 for supporting evidence of this claim.) (For reference, GenBank is a comprehensive public database that contains annotated collections of all publicly available nucleotide and DNA sequences.) "On February 4th, there's a phone call—and this is...leaked audio from AstraZeneca executives. There was a phone call placed from the Department of Defense. I believe the person making the phone call was Colonel Matt Hepburn from DARPA," Latypova says. "And he called the consortium of pharmaceutical companies telling them to switch from previously funded pan-influenza ['vaccine'] models to COVID ['vaccine'] models because, and I'm quoting him, 'COVID was declared a national security threat.'" (See tweet 16/17 for supporting evidence.) "So my question is," Latypova says, "[from] January 30th [2020] to February 4th [2020], we only have one ostensible patient having COVID. [But it's not] clear. Are they ill? Did they die? What happened?" Latypova goes on to ask rhetorically: "We have maybe 11 cases—PCR cases—of COVID in the United States [but] somehow, Colonel Matt Hepburn decides to...to say to the entire pharmaceutical consortium, which is over 300 companies, to start working on COVID products because it's a national security threat. Based on what? That's my question: How do you know that?" Latypova goes on to note: "What's more interesting...we have a whole series—hours—of Department of Defense press conferences at the Pentagon with media, over the 2020/2021 timeframe, when they were working on Operation Warp Speed. And so they would do these periodic press updates, and they're hilarious and very interesting....I don't recall the date exactly right now, but it was somewhere [in] February, early March, there [was] a press event where, there's Colonel Wendy Sammons-Jackson and a few others. So there's General [Michael J.] Talley, who leads the presentation from the DOD, and there are two or three [other] participants from Fort Detrick, the biolab and, the US Army infectious disease research. And they're all discussing this stuff. And so she [Sammons-Jackson] says specifically, 'Oh, we've received...the pathogen, meaning the COVID virus... and we [meaning the DOD] are growing the stocks of it." (See tweet 2/17 for supporting evidence.) "At that time...I remind you," Latypova adds, "we only had maybe one case; maybe 10 cases or 20 [PCR] cases of this, meaning there was no COVID virus in the US. Yet Colonel Wendy Sammons-Jackson is growing stocks of it. And guess what happens after she's growing stocks of it? We have an explosion of cases and illness in the United States. So how is this a pandemic when nothing happens before they announce it, after they announce it, and tell you we're growing stocks of it, we have a pandemic?" Latypova concludes: "So it's [COVID] not a pandemic. It's a military attack. It's a deployment of chemical, maybe radiological weapons. I don't know what they deployed, but they deployed something. There was some weird illness that was going around. [But] it's a deployment. And a majority of the deaths...were caused by, we know, hospital murder protocols—killing people in the hospitals with the protocol that I can walk you through because they tried it on my on my mother-in-law, unsuccessfully. We rescued her." (See tweets 9/17 and 10/17 for supporting evidence of the "hospital murder protocols.") "And, so I can walk you through that protocol....[I've been] with people testifying [as to] how their loved ones were killed in the exact same manner...[with] remdesivir and with ventilators and, dehydration, starvation, cruelty...Isolation...So those are the deaths. That's how they caused the deaths. They simulated illness with something [else]—some chemical weapon or something. And, the main point of this was to deploy these biological weapons, which are the shots [the COVID injections]."
Video Transcript AI Summary
The virus sequence was posted to GenBank on January 9, 2020, supposedly from a Chinese patient. By January 30th, the CDC claimed a first US case in Washington state. On February 4th, Colonel Matt Hepburn from DARPA told pharmaceutical companies to switch to COVID models because it was a national security threat.
Despite only a few reported cases in the US, the DOD was already growing stocks of the virus. This was announced at a press conference in early March. Afterward, we saw an explosion of cases.
This wasn't a pandemic; it was a military attack deploying a chemical weapon. The deaths were caused by hospital protocols like remdesivir, ventilators, dehydration, and isolation. The main point was to deploy biological weapons: the shots.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The Department of Defense quickly took over the, response to the supposedly public health event. But the so the time horse. So so the timeline of events is, I believe, the the virus, although I believe it's a virus. But anyway, so so the sequence was posted into GenBank on 01/09/2020, ostensibly from a Chinese patient that nobody has ever provided any any evidence that that that person existed. So the sequence was posted into GenBank on January 9.
On January 30, the CDC claimed that we have a first person in The United States, in Washington state, who was, again, infected with this with this virus. Again, no evidence of this person ever existing. Now so so so we go. So from January 9, January thirtieth, on February 4, there's a phone call, and this is the leaked audio from AstraZeneca executives. There was a phone call placed from the Department of Defense.
I believe the person making the phone call was colonel Matt Hepburn from DARPA. And he called the consortium pharmaceutical companies telling them to switch from previously funded flu pan influenza models to COVID models because and he quoting him, COVID was declared national security threat.
Speaker 1: Okay. Good
Speaker 0: lord. Good lord, these people. Yeah. So so my question is and so on February 1, so January 30 to February 1, we only have one ostensibly patient having COVID. Not not clear.
Are they ill? Did they die? What happened? We have maybe eleven cases, PCR cases of COVID in The United States. Somehow, colonel Matt Hepburn decides to give an authority to say to the entire pharmaceutical consortium, which is over 300 companies, to to to start working on COVID products because because it's national security threat.
Based on what?
Speaker 1: Yeah. Right. Right. That's my question. How do you know that?
Speaker 0: How how did you know that? And Yeah. And what's more interesting, then we have a whole series of those hours of Department of Defense press conferences at Pentagon with with media over the twenty twenty, twenty twenty one time frame when they were working on operational work speed. And so they would do these periodic press updates, they're hilarious and very interesting. So so starting so on on then on February 5 no.
Sorry. So it's yeah. I I I don't recall the date exactly right now, but it's it was it's somewhere February, early March. There is a press event where, there's colonel, Wendy Simmons Jackson and a few others. So there's general Talley who leads the presentation from the duty, And there are two, or three sometimes participants from, for Dietrich, the the the bio lab and, the US army in infectious disease research.
And they're all discussing this stuff. And so she says specifically that, oh, we've received so one of these very, very early conferences, we've received the pathogen, meaning COVID virus, we, meaning DOD
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 0: Received the COVID virus, and we are growing the stocks of it. Okay. Wow. Wow. Yeah.
Because at that time at that time, again, everybody remind you, we only had maybe one case, maybe 10 cases, or 20 cases of of PCR cases of this, meaning there was not no COVID virus in The US. Yet Right. You know, Wendy Simmons Jackson is growing stocks of it. And guess what happens after she's growing stocks of it? We have explosion of cases and illness in The United States.
So so how is this the pandemic when they when nothing happens before they announce it, after they announce it and tell you we're growing stocks of it, we have a pandemic?
Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah. What what a tangled web. Right. I mean, you know, yeah, you could see the cabal just rolling there.
Speaker 0: Right. So so it's not a pandemic. It's a military attack. It's a deployment of chemical, maybe radiological weapons. I don't know what they deployed, but they deployed something.
There were some weird illness was going around. So it's a deployment. And majority of the deaths, as you know so illness symptomatic illness was a separate cause from the death. The deaths were caused by, we know, hospital murder protocols, killing people in the hospitals with the protocol that I can walk you through because they tried it on my on my mother-in-law. Unsuccessfully, we we rescued her.
Speaker 1: Thank god.
Speaker 0: Yeah. And so I can walk you through the protocol, and we've been in testimonies together and all the with people testifying how their loved ones were killed in the exact same manner. Right? In with remdesivir and with ventilators and dehydration, starvation Right. Cruelty.
You know? So Isolation. The whole thing. Yeah. And so the those are the deaths.
That's how they caused the deaths. They simulated illness with something, some chemical weapon or something. And the main point of this was to deploy these biological weapons, which are the shots.
Speaker 1: There you go. Yeah.
@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor
(2/17) "There has been receipt of the [SARS-CoV-2] virus, um, in one of our laboratories, and they're currently culturing, um, growing that virus so that we can have stocks available for a number of things to test products with." — Army Col. Wendy Sammons-Jackson, March 5, 2020 Here is the conference to which Latypova refers in the clip from her Mic Meow interview. A transcription of Sammons-Jackson's remarks regarding "growing" the SARS-CoV-2 "virus" to have "stocks available" is below: "There has been receipt of the virus, um, in one of our laboratories, and they're currently culturing, um, growing that virus so that we can have stocks available for a number of things to test products with. That's, um, they're also doing, um, characterization of the virus to try to understand, learn more of what we know about the virus and how the virus, um, impacts, um, our the host and our immune response to that virus. The scientists in our other subordinate laboratories are, yes, test tubes, pipettes. They're dealing with mice. They're they're running, um, cell cultures, and and I can let the scientists here that are doing the hands on work talk a little bit." Also note that Army Brig. Gen. Michael J. Talley, commander of the U.S. Army Medical Research and Development Command, who led the March 5, 2020 conference, references the film Outbreak. (I note this because that film was clearly used as propaganda in order to prime people for the COVID scamdemic.)
Video Transcript AI Summary
We've received the virus in one of our labs and are currently culturing it to have stocks available for product testing. We're also characterizing the virus to learn more about its impact on the host and our immune response. Scientists in our labs are working with test tubes, pipettes, mice, and cell cultures.
The lab Colonel Sammons Jackson mentioned is the US Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases at Fort Detrick, the DOD's only biosafety level four laboratory. While it's not as dramatic as the movie "Outbreak", that capability exists within military medicine. We're not yet testing coronavirus at the highest levels, but that's what the lab work looks like, and we're conducting tests to some degree now with BSL-three and biosafety level two conditions.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There has been receipt of the virus, in one of our laboratories, and they're currently culturing, growing that virus so that we can have stocks available for a number of things to test products with. That's they're also doing characterization of the virus to try to understand, learn more of what we know about the virus and how the virus impacts the host and our immune response to that virus. The scientists in our other subordinate laboratories are, yes, test tubes, pipettes. They're dealing with mice. They're they're running, cell cultures, and and I can let the scientists here that are doing the hands on work talk a little bit.
Let's ask one
Speaker 1: one one description, and the laboratory that received the samples that, colonel Sammons Jackson is talking about is, the US Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases at Fort Detrick. But if you think of the movie Outbreak and the suits that they wore and the highly contagious environment without all of the drama of the movie, certainly, but that capability certainly exists within military medicine. And that particular laboratory is the DOD's only biosafety level four laboratory. So that type of work and we're not there yet with coronavirus, where we would actually bring it into containment facilities or laboratory suites to test it at higher levels. We've mentioned small animals that would be an advancement to a larger specimen perhaps.
Not there yet, but that's what the laboratory work looks like. And I think we're actually conducting that to some degree now with BSL-three conditions, biosafety level two conditions. But that's to get a
Speaker 0: pick
@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor
(3/17) Note that when one reporter asks at the March 5, 2020 DOD conference, "Where did the [SARS-CoV-2] sample come from?"—that is, the one Sammons-Jackson says was being used for the "stocks"—Sammons-Jackson replies "the CDC." Then, in a series of hugely mealy-mouthed responses: Dr. Kayvon Modjarrad, director of Emerging Infectious Diseases at the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, says, "It came from a U.S. patient." Dr. Nelson Michael, director of the Center for Infectious Disease Research at the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, adds, "I think [the patient was from] Washington State." Sammons-Jackson and Michael then fumble all over themselves as they desperately move the conversation onto the next topic without providing a clear answer, nor a name for the patient.
Video Transcript AI Summary
We got our coronavirus sample from the CDC, and it originated from a patient right here in the US. I believe the patient was in Washington state. However, we cannot provide specific diagnostic details beyond that.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Where did the sample come from? The coronavirus sample you're working on?
Speaker 1: The CDC.
Speaker 0: Okay. But there's no geographic area that can be identified of where the infection was. Was it from China? You know, did it come from China?
Speaker 2: Or No. It came it came from a US patient. Yeah. I think it was Washington state, but we you know, we didn't yeah. We we can't diagnostic.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Okay. So let's go and get some more questions in here. So
@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor
(4/17) Note that, as Latypova says, "patient zero" in the U.S. (who supposedly came from Wuhan to Seattle, Washington) was never confirmed—by anyone. The U.S. Army reported in September of 2020 that the "master stock" (what Sammons-Jackson referred to), was received in February 2020 from "a patient in Washington State." Source: https://www.army.mil/article/238943/unique_army_lab_answers_nations_call_in_supporting_covid_19_response
Unique Army lab answers nation’s call in supporting COVID-19 response
Since 1969, the U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, or USAMRIID, has responded to disease outbreaks at home and around the glob...
army.mil
@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor
(5/17) As Latypova notes, the COVID-19 "patient zero" in Wuhan was also never identified. Live Science, for example, says "A 55-year-old individual from Hubei province in China *MAY* have been the first person to have contracted COVID-19, the disease caused by the new coronavirus spreading across the globe." (Emphasis added.) Source: https://www.livescience.com/first-case-coronavirus-found.html Live Science references The South China Morning Post, which reported in March 2020 that "Government records suggest first person infected with new disease *MAY* have been a Hubei resident aged 55, but 'PATIENT ZERO' HAS YET TO BE CONFIRMED." (Emphasis added.) Source: https://www.scmp.com/news/china/society/article/3074991/coronavirus-chinas-first-confirmed-covid-19-case-traced-back
1st known case of coronavirus traced back to November in China
A 55-year-old individual from Hubei province in China may have been the first person to have contracted COVID-19, the disease caused by the new coronavirus spreading across the globe.
livescience.com
Exclusive | China’s first confirmed Covid-19 case traced back to November 17
Government records suggest first person infected with new disease may have been a Hubei resident aged 55, but ‘patient zero’ has yet to be confirmed.
scmp.com
@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor
(6/17) Here is the SARS-COV-2 sequence uploaded to GenBank from China: Updated: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/MN908947.3 Original: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/MN908947.2
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 isolate Wuhan-Hu-1, co - Nucleotide - NCBI
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Wuhan seafood market pneumonia virus isolate Wuhan-Hu-1, complete geno - Nucleotide - NCBI
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor
(7/17) Note that the CDC says that IT NEVER ISOLATED SARS-COV-2 for its PCR "test." Source: https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download This confirms the U.S. never had an isolated virus—only a gene sequence uploaded to GenBank by China.
@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor
(8/17) On March 5 & 6 of 2020, the day of and day after the DOD press conference featuring Sammons-Jackson saying they were "growing" "stocks" of SARS-CoV-2, there were only ~200–300 "cases" in the entire country. Source: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1103185/cumulative-coronavirus-covid19-cases-number-us-by-day/ Source: https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/us/#google_vignette
Cumulative COVID cases in the U.S. from 2020 to 2022 | Statista
As of November 11, 2022, the U.S. had a total of around 96.8 million COVID cases. By the end of 2020, there had been just over 19 million cases.
statista.com
United States COVID - Coronavirus Statistics - Worldometer
United States Coronavirus update with statistics and graphs: total and new cases, deaths per day, mortality and recovery rates, current active cases, recoveries, trends and timeline.
worldometers.info
@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor
(9/17) Regarding what Latypova says about the hospital "murder protocols," note that analysis based off death certificates points to 500,000+ Americans killed by the protocols between 2020 and 2024. Full thread, featuring medical whistleblowers:
@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor
(10/17) Medical whistleblower, author, and former medical coder Zowe Smith has also brought to light how the remdesivir+ventilator murder protocols were used to slaughter hospital patients, who were then labeled as COVID deaths:
@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor
(11/17) Furthermore, note that the WHO **LITERALLY** refers to COVID as a "FAKE." They pronounce the acronym for "Public Health Emergency of International Concern (or PHEIC)" (what COVID was) as a FAKE.
Video Transcript AI Summary
A public health emergency of international concern is an extraordinary event that poses a public health risk to other countries through the international spread of disease, potentially requiring a coordinated global response. It's serious, sudden, unusual, unexpected, and has implications beyond a single nation's borders, possibly needing immediate international action.
A pandemic is when a new virus affects the world's population. Declaring a public health emergency of international concern is the highest alarm level by the World Health Organization, meant to coordinate immediate action before an event escalates into a pandemic. In the case of COVID-19, we faced both a public health emergency of international concern and a pandemic.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: A public health emergency of international concern or a fake or a fake or a fake or a fake
Speaker 1: defined by the IHR as an extraordinary event which is determined to constitute a public health risk to other states through the international spread of disease and to potentially require a coordinated international response. This definition implies the situation is serious, sudden, unusual or unexpected, that it carries implications for public health beyond the affected state's national borders, and may require immediate international actions. A pandemic is something slightly different. A pandemic is typically when there's a new virus that is affecting the world's population. It's very difficult to define once you reach a state when a new virus is a pandemic.
The idea of declaring a public health emergency of international concern, which is the highest level of alarm by the World Health Organization under the international health regulations, is to coordinate that immediate action before the event becomes even bigger and becomes a pandemic. In the situation of COVID nineteen, we are in both a public health emergency of international concern as well
Speaker 0: as
Speaker 1: a pandemic.
@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor
(12/17) Also note that the National Security Council (NSC) was ****in charge of**** COVID-19 policy. Not HHS or any of its subsidiaries.
@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor
(13/17) The NSC took a reasonable pandemic response plan—PanCAP—and requested an "updated" plan—PanCAP-A. PanCAP-A, which set COVID policy for the U.S., *****IS NOT A PUBLICLY AVAILABLE DOCUMENT.***** Source for tweets 12/17 & 13/17: https://www.fema.gov/sites/default/files/documents/fema_covid-19-initial-assessment-report_2021.pdf
@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor
(14/17) Here is Professor Emeritus of Epidemiology at Yale Dr. Harvey Risch (@DrHarveyRisch) describing how "the U.S. security state...took command of the pandemic on day five after the [COVID] emergency was declared in 2020."
@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor
"What we've lived through has been a fifth-generation propaganda war fed from the top level of the U.S. security state that took command of the pandemic on day five after the emergency was declared in 2020." (Tweet 1/4) Professor Emeritus of Epidemiology at Yale Dr. Harvey Risch (@DrHarveyRisch) describes for Gary Null of http://PRN.live how the U.S. security state—specifically the National Security Council (NSC)—took command of the national COVID-19 response, and executed on a "scam." "[N]othing changed in public health [in 2020]," Risch says. "What changed is who was telling the public health infrastructure what to do. And terrorizing the public health infrastructure into carrying this all out." Risch specifically notes the U.S. public health system "Did the exact opposite of all established public health protocols for managing a respiratory virus pandemic." He offers former CDC Director Rochelle Walensky as an example of how the U.S. security state intimidated public health officials: Walensky was told if she "didn't comply with the security state requirements of what she had to say and what her policies were, that she would be responsible for killing millions of people. And, unfortunately, she believed that," Risch says. He notes other officials were "convinced" or "threatened" to "make policies and actions that were exactly scientifically contrary to everything that was known about managing the pandemic." As for the motivations, Risch speculates that the U.S. security state was "attempting to cover up our role in creating this virus in the first place," "shilling" for pharmaceutical companies, and enforcing a state of "fascism."
Video Transcript AI Summary
We've experienced a fifth-generation propaganda war orchestrated by the US security state, which took control of the pandemic response and defied established public health protocols. Despite prior knowledge, the public health infrastructure was terrorized into implementing policies like lockdowns and mask mandates, which were previously deemed ineffective.
This propaganda war targeted not only the public but also the public health establishment itself. People like Rochelle Walensky were threatened into compliance. The motivations behind this were to cover up the US's role in creating the virus, shift blame to China, and promote large pharmaceutical companies.
Irrational policies were implemented despite easily observable evidence, such as the disproportionate risk to older individuals. The pandemic response became a scam propagated through the public health establishment through manipulation and threats.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There you have it, that what we've lived through has been a fifth generation, as they say, propaganda war fed from the top level of The US security state that took command of the pandemic on day five after the emergency was declared in 2020 and did the exact opposite to all established public health protocols for managing a respiratory virus pandemic. So this was all worked out for influenza. Some of the people, like Tom Inglesby, who has been involved in the pandemic now, wrote the exact opposite in a major paper in 02/2006 talking about how to manage an influenza pandemic, where he said that lockdowns should not be used, closing airports shouldn't be used, masks are useless, social distancing is useless, and so on, that you manage the severity of the illness but not the fact of the illness. And that was all correct. That was all standard public health technology of 02/2006.
Nothing changed in public health. What changed is who was telling the public health infrastructure what to do and terrorizing the public health infrastructure into carrying this all out. And so this became a propaganda war. And not just against American people or people around the world, it became a propaganda war against the public health establishment itself, where you had people like Rochelle Walensky being told that if she didn't comply with the security state requirements of what she had to say and what her policies were, that she would be responsible for killing millions of people. And unfortunately, she believed that.
And this is the problem that all of the people put in place to manage our public health response to the pandemic themselves were propagandized and convinced, threatened, or whatever, to make policies and actions that were exactly scientifically contrary to everything that was known about managing the pandemic. And so this came from a security state of The United States that the National Security Council and the individuals involved in that who had motivation for doing that, that is still somewhat unclear. The motivations were, I think, two or threefold. One is that they were attempting to cover up our role, The United States' role, creating this virus in the first place. They were also and by covering that up, they were trying to basically put the responsibility on China, pointing, See, look over there, that distraction policy.
And at the same time, they were shilling for their friends, the large pharma companies, the so called public private partnership, which is basically fascism. And so that's what they were doing and that's what they were enforcing. And you can understand that there were so many irrational things that were fed to the American public about behaviors that just contradict easily observable evidence to laypeople, not just to us scientists, but to laypeople. For example, we knew in the first month of the pandemic that the risks to older people with multiple chronic conditions were way higher for mortality from the infection than to normal children and young adults, a thousandfold higher. The CDC put out those statistics very early on.
So we knew this was the case. Then why did we demand to vaccinate anything that moved? Every human that moved basically had to be vaccinated. There was no rational reason for this, And this went on and on and on throughout the pandemic, where one could see that the motives and the dissembling of things, the changes in policies that incrementally boiled the lobster, boiled the frog, was used in a public health circumstance where public health is used to thinking, to a little bit of degree in the noble lie, which is that public health, are supposed to be experts in how we help people survive major threats to health, and therefore we could be forgiven for basically propagandizing to mild degrees, I would say, to motivate people to choose behaviors that they would shrug off thinking that it won't affect them when we know from a public health point of view that things will eventually. That became a malignant process through the pandemic, where these massive lies about things got promulgated through public health establishment because they were either threatened or manipulated or propagandized to believe the lies that came from above them.
And so much of the whole response to the pandemic has been a scam that has been foisted on the American public, if not the world,
Progressive Radio Network
The #1 Radio Station for Progressive Minds!
prn.live
@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor
(15/17) Army Genral Gus Perna was the Chief Operation Officer of Operation Warp Speed. DARPA, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, developed the tech for the COVID injections starting more than a decade prior to 2020. Source: https://www.defense.gov/News/News-Stories/Article/article/2459464/perna-whole-of-america-operation-warp-speed-effort-remarkable-feat/ Source: https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/how-a-secretive-pentagon-agency-seeded-the-ground-for-a-rapid-coronavirus-cure/2020/07/30/ad1853c4-c778-11ea-a9d3-74640f25b953_story.html
Perna: Whole-of-America Operation Warp Speed Effort 'Remarkable Feat'
Operation Warp Speed has been moving quickly to get doses from Pfizer and Moderna out to everyone who needs them, the chief operating officer of the effort said.
defense.gov
@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor
@DrHarveyRisch (16/17) Latypova's Substack post featuring the leaked AstraZeneca call she references in this thread's first clip: https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/audio-leaked-from-astrazeneca-covid?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email
Audio Leaked from AstraZeneca: Covid was classified as a National Security Threat by the US Government/DOD on February 4, 2020.
Recorded in an internal AZ meeting with participation of the CEO, Pascal Soirot.
sashalatypova.substack.com
@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor
@DrHarveyRisch (17/17) Full interview with Latypova: https://rumble.com/v5vylc2-intentional-live-season-1-ep.-40-12-3-2024-the-moratorium-is-growing.html?e9s=src_v1_ucp
'Intentional' Live Season 1, Ep. 40: 12-3-2024 -- "The Moratorium is Growing!"
The calls are growing to suspend the Covid Bioweapon and the HHS Department is headed for a major overhaul. Intentional is broadcast live Tue/Wed/Thu 2PM ET on W4HC.com - part of talk4radio.com on tal
rumble.com
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe mainstream media today engages in more gaslighting for the government than in the past. Elites and legacy media have long manipulated public opinion through propaganda, often with minimal scrutiny compared to grassroots misinformation. Historical examples, like Operation Mockingbird and the Iraq War, illustrate how media can amplify false narratives. The profit-driven model prioritizes sensationalism, allowing elites to control narratives and suppress dissent. This results in a polarized public, where misinformation thrives and corrections rarely reach the same audience.
@MauriceMur4768 - Maurice Murphy 1215
The mainstream media today does more gaslighting for the government then the Victorians ever had The Pervasive Propaganda of Elites and Legacy Media Media outlets and elites have long been significant purveyors of propaganda and misinformation, using their vast resources and centralized control to shape public opinion for political, economic, and social agendas. While grassroots misinformation often faces scrutiny, elite-driven narratives operate on a much larger scale, with far greater impact. Governments and elites have exploited media to influence public perception. During the Cold War, the CIA’s Operation Mockingbird embedded pro-American propaganda in major news outlets. Similarly, during the Iraq War, media amplified false claims about weapons of mass destruction (WMDs), garnering support for an invasion based on fabricated evidence. Even in democracies, elites use regulatory pressure or economic power to shape media coverage, suppress dissent, and align narratives with Modern media’s profit-driven model prioritizes sensationalism and engagement over accuracy. Dependence on advertising revenue gives corporate sponsors undue influence, discouraging critical reporting that could threaten elite interests. This relationship perpetuates narratives that reinforce the status quo, sidelining stories that challenge powerful institutions. Elites excel at controlling narratives through selective framing, often omitting key facts to present skewed interpretations. As outlined in Chomsky and Herman’s Manufacturing Consent, this ensures the public consumes stories that align with dominant ideologies, while alternative perspectives are systematically excluded. Legacy media’s vast infrastructure allows it to amplify misinformation on a global scale. Unlike grassroots sources, elite-driven narratives reach millions through coordinated messaging across print, broadcast, and digital platforms. Repetition makes these narratives appear credible, significantly shaping public opinion. Partisan media deepens polarization by catering to ideological audiences and reinforcing biases. False equivalence in mainstream reporting also misleads the public, giving undue attention to fringe perspectives while distorting the weight of evidence. Elite-driven misinformation often faces minimal consequences. Corrections, when issued, rarely reach the same audience as the original falsehoods. Instead, legacy media frequently deflects blame onto grassroots sources, ignoring its own significant role in shaping flawed narratives. The Iraq War is a stark example of elite-driven propaganda, where false WMD claims went unchallenged, leading to widespread public support for an unjustified invasion. Similarly, during the 2008 financial crisis, media failed to scrutinize risky financial practices, protecting Wall Street interests. More recently, conflicting COVID-19 narratives have shown how even reputable outlets can contribute to public confusion through negligence or framing.
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared a series of posts highlighting significant stories the media overlooked. One discusses claims by persuasion expert Chase Hughes about the COVID response being a psyop, emphasizing the silencing of dissenting voices. Another reveals how a shadow government operates independently, manipulating public funds. I also noted various reactions in media, including Joy Reid's emotional response to her firing and Don Lemon's confrontation with Megyn Kelly. Lastly, alarming data on rising mortality rates in the U.S. linked to COVID-19 vaccines was presented, alongside a disturbing UK government plot to access encrypted data from iPhone users.
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
10 Shocking Stories the Media Buried Today #10 - Persuasion expert bets his career on the COVID response being a full-blown psyop. JOE ROGAN: “Do you think that someone sat in a room and that people discussed the best ways to get people to comply?” CHASE HUGHES: “Yes. Oh, yes. I would bet my career because it was executed following textbook protocol.” Hughes explained that the key sign of a psyop is “if the opinion that’s coming out needs people to be silenced.” “So if you can’t question it—if you’re supposed to just go along, it’s a psyop,” Hughes reiterated. During COVID, terms like “disinformation” and “misinformation” flooded the airwaves, but those terms were often weaponized to discredit voices and opinions the government didn’t like. Doctors like Jay Bhattacharya and Martin Kulldorff, respected scientists at Stanford and Harvard, were silenced simply for challenging lockdowns through the Great Barrington Declaration. “And it was openly discussed in emails,” Rogan pointed out. “That’s what’s really crazy. They talked about the strategy of silencing these people, and then you had the actual government itself contacting Twitter, trying to get people removed, which is wild.” They even went as far as to write headlines like “Mocking anti-vaxxers’ COVID deaths is ghoulish, yes — but may be necessary” (LA Times). “My hope is that people have learned from this past four years and that this is an eye-opener,” Rogan said. (See 9 More Revealing Stories Below)
Video Transcript AI Summary
I would bet my career that people sat in a room and discussed the best ways to get people to comply. I even made a YouTube video on how to spot psychological operations. If the opinion that's coming out needs people to be silenced, it's a psyop.
If you can't question something and people have to be silenced or publicly shamed for their information, that is a psyop. Public shaming is like the tribe. That's why public speaking is our number one fear - fear of judgment.
Harvard doctors were kicked off the internet. The Great Barrington Declaration was silenced and treated like fringe quacks instead of respected physicians. It was openly discussed in emails. The government contacted Twitter trying to get people removed.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Do you think that someone sat in a room and that people discussed the best ways to get people to comply?
Speaker 1: Yes. Oh, yes. I would I would bet my career because it was executed following textbook protocol. And there are these I made a YouTube video on my channel of like how to spot psyops, and there's like 20 different little things. You only need one.
One thing, and you can spot whether or not you're standing in the middle of a psyop. That one thing is if the opinion that's coming out needs people to be silenced, it's a SIOP. There's there are psychological operations in play. Wow.
Speaker 0: So if you can't question it, if you're supposed to just go along, it's a psyop.
Speaker 1: Yeah. And if and if people have to be silenced or or publicly shamed because of their because of their information, and they're not telling people the sky is falling. They're not they're not saying crazy shit. Mhmm. They're just saying basic stuff, and they need to be silenced.
That is a No matter what, you can go back in any any time in history during a SIOP of our country, and if people needed to be silenced or shamed publicly, which is like the tribe. Right? That's why public speaking is our number one fear for for humans. It's not a fear of speaking. It's a fear of judgment.
Right. So I'm I'm just putting the threat of judgment out there. That is a psyop. So if people have to be silenced, and they were Harvard doctors kicked off of the Internet or kicked off Yeah. Twitter for for this stuff.
Speaker 0: Yeah. And and that's Stanford, MIT.
Speaker 1: Yeah. That's all you need.
Speaker 0: Yeah. The the great Barrington Declaration. People didn't agree with exactly how the government was handling everything, and they were silenced. And they were treated like fringe quacks instead of respected physicians. And it was openly discussed in emails.
That's what's really crazy. They they they talked about the strategy of silencing these people. And then you had the actual government itself contacting Twitter, trying to get people removed, which is wild.
Speaker 1: Hey. And didn't you didn't you have Mark Zuckerberg on? He talked about Mhmm.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Talked about Facebook doing it, about the FBI contacting them. It's it's crazy to believe, but my hope is that people have learned from this past four years and that this is
Speaker 1: an
Speaker 0: eye opener.
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
#9 - @DataRepublican stuns Glenn Beck with a blunt explanation of how the shadow government subverts the will of the people. “They’re offended [by DOGE] because their power depends on people not knowing what they’re doing with [our] money. “And so that is truly censorship. Because I think if actual Americans understood what they were doing with our money and that they were actually setting up their own government and actually ignoring what real people wanted to do, oh, we would be so upset. “Because the reality is that these people have a government unto themselves that they’ve created with these NGOs that they run separately from us. “And the reason I’m doing this interview is because I want to promote the knowledge to the public that these people operate in different vocabulary, with different rules, and they have made their own government inside ours with our money.” Nobody’s ever broken it down like this before. Data Republican just pulled back the curtain—and it’s worse than we thought.
Video Transcript AI Summary
I'm not a fan of the term "globalist," but these individuals thrive on censorship and secrecy. Their power relies on preventing people from understanding how they manipulate money. If Americans truly grasped how our funds are used to establish a separate government, ignoring the needs of real people, there would be outrage. These individuals have essentially created their own government within ours, utilizing NGOs and operating by a different set of rules and vocabulary, all funded by our money. My goal here is to expose this reality, highlighting how they function independently within our system.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Are we gonna be able to stop this? Because I know there's more levels to it than what, you know, we're showing from your research now. All the globalists, and they don't I don't really like that term globalist, but anyway, well, it doesn't matter. But they think they all emphasize this censorship and this secrecy. And the reason why they're offended is because their power depends on people not knowing what they're doing with their money.
And so that is truly censorship because I think if actual Americans understood what they were doing with our money and that they were actually setting up their own government and actually ignoring what real people wanted to do, ugh, we would be so upset because the reality is that the these people have a government unto themselves that they've created with these NGOs that they run separately from us. And the reason I'm doing this interview is because I wanna promote the knowledge to the public that these people operate in different vocabulary with different rules and they have made their own government inside ours with our money.
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
@DataRepublican #8 - Democrats are flailing over Musk & DOGE gaining access to IRS data. But in 2023, Joe Biden gave 53 unpaid researchers & student volunteers access to the SAME SYSTEM & they said NOTHING. Credit: @ByronDonalds
Video Transcript AI Summary
The massive bloat in government spending allows politicians to hide their pet projects. For example, Stacey Abrams' climate group, with a revenue of only $100, is slated to receive $2 billion.
There's outrage over Elon Musk's team accessing IRS data, yet the Biden administration allowed 53 unpaid researchers and students full access to the American people's data at the IRS. They're okay with waste, fraud, and abuse as long as their special interest groups are funded and their ideology is promoted, regardless of the will of the American people.
Our country can't survive this. We are thankful that Donald Trump and his team are saying enough is enough and will begin the process of restoring a constitutional republic.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: No. It has nothing to do with that. It has to do with this very simple thing. They love the massive bloat in waste because it's like you said, Mark, they get to fit all of their little pet projects underneath the covers where nobody can see it. You got Stacey Abrams and one of her climate funk groups is supposed to get $2,000,000,000 when if you look at their tax returns, their revenue is only a hundred dollars, and they're getting $2,000,000,000.
This is the kind of stuff. They're so upset about Elon Musk and the Doge team having access to the internal revenue service data into the treasury payment system. But there's a g there's a report that came out the other day that under Joe Biden, he let 53 researchers and students, unpaid people, go in and actually have full access to the data of the American people at the IRS. Joe Biden's administration let that happen. So they have no problem with the waste and the fraud and the abuse as long as their special interest groups are being funded and their ideology is being promoted regardless of the will of the American people.
But our country can't simply survive that. We are very thankful that Donald Trump and his team are saying enough is enough. They are going to save this nation for the American people and begin the process of restoring a constitutional republic.
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
@DataRepublican @ByronDonalds #7 - Joy Reid breaks down in tears after MSNBC firing. “My show had value!”
Video Transcript AI Summary
I'm sorry for getting emotional, but my show mattered. I'm grateful. I felt guilty for addressing tough issues, from Black Lives Matter to the targeting of Asian Americans, defending immigrants, questioning the president, defending inconvenient books, understanding 1619, and speaking about Gaza. I'm not sorry for standing up for these issues. As a church girl, I believe these values are of God. I'm proud of my show.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: My show had value and that I'm sorry. That, that what I was doing had value had value. And in the end I'm sorry. I'm not I try not to cry on TV, and I take this is kinda like me on TV, so I apologize. And that and that it kind of and then it mattered.
I see Karen is there, and she's been texting me as well. And so what I will just say is that in the end thank you. Where I land is that the moment that I of guilt that I felt that I went hard on so many issues, whether it was the Black Lives Matter issues of a young baby, or a mom or a dad that was killed, or, when we opened up people's eyes to the fact that Asian Americans were being targeted and not just black folks that or went hard for immigrants who've done nothing but come to this country like my parents did and try to make a life and defended them, or whether we've talked about what the president is doing that is subversive to the constitution, that is injurious to our liberty, you know, defending books that people find inconvenient, you know, that Nicole Hannah Jones put into our spirit that we need to understand 1619 as the real founding of this country, whether it's talking about any of these issues. And and, yes, whether it's talking about Gaza and the fact that we as the American people have a right to object to have a right to object to little babies being bombed.
And and where I come down on that is I'm not sorry. I am not sorry that I stood up for those those things because those things are of God. And and, you know, I'm a church girl too, and those the those are the things that I was taught were of God. And so I I'm not sorry. I'm just proud of my show.
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
@DataRepublican @ByronDonalds #6 - Karoline Leavitt warns Washington bureaucrats that they should be “nervous” over Dan Bongino’s FBI nomination. “We often see that when outsiders are appointed to such coveted positions, a lot of people in this city get very, very nervous. And they should be...”
Video Transcript AI Summary
I want to highlight the exceptional qualities of this individual, who brings a wealth of experience from his time at the FBI and the Secret Service. He is a dedicated patriot who has served our nation with distinction. His understanding of the deep-seated corruption within these institutions is precisely why President Trump sought him out to drive change.
It's disheartening to witness attempts to mislabel him. He is a former law enforcement officer and Secret Service agent who risked his life for this country. The president has entrusted him with this crucial role because he's an outsider to the Washington swamp, and his appointment, along with others, signals a commitment to rooting out corruption and ending the weaponization of government.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: When he talks about the, past corruption at the FBI, when he talks about his experience, serving, for the United States Secret Service. This is a man who loves his country and who has honorably served our country in ways that many people have not. He understands the depth of the corruption at these institutions, which the American people reelected president Trump to shake up. And I think it's quite despicable to see many networks in this room who have had chyrons on their television screens labeling mister Bongino as a far right podcaster. He is not.
He is a former, law enforcement, agent. He is a former secret service agent who put his life on the line to protect this country, and that is why the president of The United States has entrusted him for this important role. He's also, an outsider to this Washington swamp, and we often see that when outsiders are appointed, to such coveted positions, a lot of people in this city get very, very nervous, and they should be because Dan Bongino and Kash Patel and attorney general Bondi are focused on rooting out the corruption at these agencies and ending the weaponization of government once and for all.
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
@DataRepublican @ByronDonalds While you’re here, don’t forget to follow me (@VigilantFox) and hit the bell 🔔 for more daily news roundups.
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
@DataRepublican @ByronDonalds #5 - Don Lemon tells Megyn Kelly to F off. “Let me just say to Megyn Kelly, in my 30-some years as a journalist and my 50-some years as a person of color, go f**k yourself.” Credit: @TheChiefNerd
Video Transcript AI Summary
As a journalist for over 30 years and a person of color for over 50 years, I want to say to Megyn Kelly, go yourself. I typically avoid discussing her because she thrives on attention and has built the latter part of her career on being a troll.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So let me just say to Megyn Kelly, in my thirty some years as a journalist and my fifty some years as a person of color, go yourself. Okay? I usually don't like to talk about her because she's one of those people. She thrives on it. She has built her the second part of whatever of her career on being a troll.
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
@DataRepublican @ByronDonalds @TheChiefNerd #4 - FBI Whistleblower Drops a Disturbing Bombshell on Kash Patel and Dan Bongino https://vigilantnews.com/post/deep-state-in-panic-whistleblower-says-fbi-is-deleting-damning-evidence-even-musk-cant-save/
FBI Whistleblower Drops a Disturbing Bombshell on Kash Patel and Dan Bongino
The rabbit hole just got deeper.
vigilantnews.com
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
@DataRepublican @ByronDonalds @TheChiefNerd #3 - Maddow DETONATES: Slams MSNBC as Racist in Jaw-Dropping Rant https://vigilantnews.com/post/maddow-detonates-slams-msnbc-as-racist-in-jaw-dropping-rant/
Maddow DETONATES: Slams MSNBC as Racist in Jaw-Dropping Rant
Is Rachel Maddow next on the chopping block?
vigilantnews.com
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
@DataRepublican @ByronDonalds @TheChiefNerd #2 - AI Robot ‘Attacks’ Crowd in China https://vigilantnews.com/post/watch-ai-robot-attacks-crowd-in-china/
Watch: AI Robot ‘Attacks’ Crowd in China
Creepy as hell.
vigilantnews.com
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
#1 - The U.S. is facing a full-blown mortality crisis, and insurance data shows it’s worse than anyone thought. Life expectancy in the U.S. is now worse than it was a decade ago. Josh Stirling, founder of the Insurance Collaboration to Save Lives, says mortality rates are alarmingly high, especially for younger age groups. Why? The evidence points to the COVID-19 vaccines, says Epidemiologist Nic Hulscher. Here’s his breakdown: Cardiac deaths up 8-36%: The largest COVID-19 vaccine safety study ever conducted (99 million vaccinated individuals) found myocarditis risk surges up to 610% post-mRNA injection. Subclinical vaccine-induced myopericarditis may trigger reentrant ventricular tachycardia or spontaneous ventricular fibrillation, leading to sudden cardiac death. Our King County, WA study and @EthicalSkeptic analysis of CDC data confirm excess sudden cardiac deaths skyrocketed after mass mRNA injection. Neurological deaths up 16-39%: mRNA injections linked to Ischemic stroke (+44%), Hemorrhagic stroke (+50%), Transient ischemic attack (+67%), Myelitis (+165%), Myasthenia gravis (+71%), Alzheimer’s (+22.5%), Cognitive impairment (+138%), Depression (+68.3%), Anxiety disorders (+43.9%), Sleep disorders (+93.4%)—the neurological toll is undeniable. Cancer rates up 10-50%: CDC data, peer-reviewed studies, and population-level analyses suggest COVID-19 mRNA injections are likely carcinogenic, contributing to rising cancer cases. Ethical Skeptic's analysis of CDC data shows excess cancer mortality up 9% post-mRNA rollout. Studies suggest mRNA injections may impair immune surveillance, hinder DNA repair, and accelerate tumor growth—fulfilling the Multi-Hit Hypothesis of Oncogenesis. Case reports link the shots to aggressive cancers, including intravascular large B-cell lymphoma, hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis, and cutaneous adenoid cystic carcinoma. The surge in post-vaccine cancer cases demands urgent investigation. “These data suggest that the mass COVID-19 mRNA injection campaign is a primary driver of the collapse in U.S. life expectancy, preventing its full recovery,” Hulscher concluded. “Urgent intervention by the federal government is indicated to immediately remove these life-reducing injections from the market and begin steps to reverse these negative trends.” Follow @NicHulscher for more breaking news and analysis on the COVID-19 injections.
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
@DataRepublican @ByronDonalds @TheChiefNerd BONUS #1 - Man Loses 300 Pounds on Carnivore Diet Rejected by MDs https://www.theepochtimes.com/bright/i-only-eat-eggs-bacon-beef-720-pound-man-loses-300-pounds-on-carnivore-diet-rejected-by-mds-5636989?utm_source=copyreflink&utm_campaign=vigilantf&src_src=copyreflink&src_cmp=vigilantf
‘I Only Eat Eggs, Bacon, Beef’: 720-Pound Man Loses 300 Pounds on Carnivore Diet Rejected by MDs
theepochtimes.com
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
@DataRepublican @ByronDonalds @TheChiefNerd BONUS #2 - Why Your Doctor Is Probably Wrong About Cholesterol https://www.theepochtimes.com/health/why-dietary-cholesterol-isnt-the-enemy-5796165?utm_source=copyreflink&utm_campaign=vigilantf&src_src=copyreflink&src_cmp=vigilantf
Why Dietary Cholesterol Isn’t the Enemy
Research shows dietary cholesterol has little impact on blood cholesterol. So what really affects it?
theepochtimes.com
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
@DataRepublican @ByronDonalds @TheChiefNerd BONUS #3 - How to Get Ivermectin, Z-Pak and More https://vigilantnews.com/post/how-to-get-ivermectin-z-pak-and-more/
How to Get Ivermectin, Z-Pak, and More
While millions of Americans understand the need to be prepared, far too many are failing to stockpile one of the single most important items.
vigilantnews.com
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
@DataRepublican @ByronDonalds @TheChiefNerd BONUS #4 - Top Doctor Reveals Simple Formula to Prevent 80 Percent of Chronic Diseases https://www.theepochtimes.com/health/a-doctors-simple-formula-to-prevent-80-percent-of-chronic-diseases-5789789?utm_source=copyreflink&utm_campaign=vigilantf&src_src=copyreflink&src_cmp=vigilantf
A Doctor’s Simple Formula to Prevent 80 Percent of Chronic Diseases
A Yale-graduate doctor discusses how lessons learned from our ancestors can help us live longer, better lives.
theepochtimes.com
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
@DataRepublican @ByronDonalds @TheChiefNerd BONUS #5 - How to Remove Fluoride From Your Water at Home https://www.theepochtimes.com/health/fluoride-free-your-guide-to-water-filtration-and-health-5741827?utm_source=prtnrhard&utm_campaign=vigilantf&src_src=prtnrhard&src_cmp=vigilantf
How to Remove Fluoride From Your Water at Home
Since 1945, fluoride has been added to public drinking water supplies, but research has shown it may pose risks to our health.
theepochtimes.com
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
@DataRepublican @ByronDonalds @TheChiefNerd Thanks for reading! If you enjoyed this report, please do me a quick favor and follow me (@VigilantFox) for more posts like this one. In other news, the UK government just got BUSTED in a secret plot to extract your data. Read more below:
@VigilantFox - The Vigilant Fox 🦊
10 Shocking Stories the Media Buried This Week #10 – UK government BUSTED in a secret plot to extract personal data from 2 billion iPhone users. They were this close to your “encrypted” data. This story begins when the UK govt hit Apple with a secret gag order, forcing them to either backdoor encrypted data for billions of users or face criminal charges if they refused to comply. Apple couldn’t even talk about it. The order demanded Apple create a vulnerability in its iCloud encryption, which would have given the UK government a back door to financial information, health records, and private conversations—not just of UK citizens but of two billion iPhone users worldwide. Remember, the UK government has already tried to threaten and extradite individuals outside the UK for violating British censorship laws—including US citizens over their online posts. So what happens when governments push to punish you not just for what you say publicly but for what you say privately? Rather than handing over the data of 2 billion iPhone users to the UK government, Apple chose to pull its Advanced Data Protection (ADP) in the UK—removing the option for UK users to enable encryption. Existing UK users must now disable encryption, and new users won’t have the option at all. US citizens and people in other countries remain unaffected by the UK government’s dystopian push to surveil and censor speech—for now. The UK government was this close to surveilling you, too—but luckily, Sayer Ji, Elon Musk, and The Wall Street Journal exposed this privacy nightmare. In another disturbing development, Imran Ahmed of the CCDH—one of the leading architects of the UK’s war on speech—is being awarded for his Orwellian efforts with a $300,000 prize this May. @sayerjigmi has put together a petition to oppose this absurd aggrandizement of someone who has worked tirelessly to annihilate personal freedoms and silence dissenting voices. You can sign that petition here: https://www.change.org/p/urge-elevate-prize-foundation-to-reexamine-award-for-imran-ahmed (See 9 More Revealing Stories Below)
Video Transcript AI Summary
Governments worldwide are following a totalitarian control agenda outlined in the Rockefeller Foundation's "Lockstep" document. The UK government, in particular, is leading the charge, secretly ordering Apple to create a backdoor for encrypted iCloud data, affecting 2 billion users worldwide. This order, issued under the Investigatory Powers Act, is a global privacy nightmare.
Apple faces a difficult choice: comply and weaken encryption globally, or withdraw services from the UK. This move ties into a broader censorship agenda, including the UK's Online Safety Bill and the EU's Digital Services Act, which criminalize dissent and censor free speech. Governments are using tech companies as enforcement arms, threatening citizens for online criticism, highlighting a war on encryption and control.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Welcome back to another week of media blackout, and, boy, do we have some shocking stories for you today. The previous US administration, Australian, Canadian, UK governments, and EU have been following the Rockefeller lockstep document to a t, including the part that happens after the pandemic despite mass awareness and rejection of this agenda. For those that aren't aware of this document, it is titled scenarios for the future of technology and international development published by the Rockefeller Foundation in 2010 and basically outlines exactly how governments in lockstep will gain totalitarian control through a virus and practices adopted during the virus that will continue and, in fact, intensify after the, quote, unquote, pandemic. To quote from the document itself, lockstep, a world of tighter top down government control and more authoritarian leadership with limited innovation and growing citizen pushback. It goes on to say, even after the pandemic faded, this more authoritarian control and oversight of citizens and their activities stuck and even intensified.
At first, the notion of a more controlled world gained wide acceptance and approval. Citizens willingly gave up some of their sovereignty and their privacy to more paternalistic states in exchange for greater safety and stability. Citizens were more tolerant and even eager for top down direction and oversight, and national leaders have had more latitude to impose order in the ways they saw fit. In developed countries, this heightened oversight took many forms, biometric IDs for all citizens, for example. And, of course, we have seen this very nightmare scenario continuing to play out.
Perhaps one of the most egregious examples is in The UK where in recent times, the government has become so drunk with maddening power that they are imprisoning people for mean tweets, scouring the corners of the Internet for even the slightest criticism of their authoritarian regime and policies. But a new order from the UK government to Apple may have just been the step too far that will change the course of some of this. From Sayo g breaking, The UK just ordered Apple to kill encryption for 2,000,000,000 people, and they can't even talk about it. A global privacy nightmare is unfolding. The UK government secretly ordered Apple to backdoor encrypted iCloud storage worldwide, but Apple is legally forbidden from revealing this order, or they could face criminal charges.
Now this affects 2,000,000,000 users, but the point is that they wanted access to worldwide data. So this extends far beyond The UK. And interestingly, Sayer's account was hacked right after Elon retweeted his post raising awareness to this. Under The UK's Investigatory Powers Act 2016, Apple was served a technical capability notice or TCN, forcing them to create a backdoor for encrypted iCloud data. This is not limited to UK users.
As we said before, it actually applies worldwide, meaning your private files are at risk no matter where you live. Apple is legally forbidden from revealing this order. If Apple even acknowledges that The UK issued this demand, they could face criminal charges. This is a secret government order with global consequences. And it's not just about The UK, although they are leading the charge in threatening citizens in other countries for violating British censorship laws.
You would remember the threats that came from The UK Police Commissioner where they said that they would threaten to extradite and jail US citizens over their online posts. Now Apple's choices are to either comply and weaken encryption globally or refuse and withdraw services from The UK. WhatsApp and Signal faced similar threats last year and vowed to leave The UK rather than compromise security. And this was, of course, after The UK passed the Online Safety Act, bill or The UK Online Safety Bill. Encryption protects financial data and health records and personal security, for example, where you live or work, and also private conversations.
So this matters for everyone. Governments always say they need backdoors for national security, but history shows they're just used for mass surveillance. And once a backdoor exists, hackers, rogue employees, and other governments will find it. The UK is trying to dominate the global surveillance and censorship landscape. UK is obviously part of Five Eyes, but notably, The US, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand have supported strong encryption to mitigate cyber threats.
But The UK stands alone in its war on encryption. And it's not just about encryption, though. It is about control. And governments worldwide are criminalizing dissent and censoring free speech using tech companies as their enforcement arms. And this ties into The UK's broader globally orchestrated census ship agenda, which is the online safety bill.
It criminalizes encrypted messaging and forces platforms to scan private messages. The Digital Services Act in the EU gives governments the power to shut down online content they don't like, and leaked US UK documents show direct coordination between UK intelligence and the Biden administration to censor online speech. So, obviously, Apple has a very difficult decision to make, and in fact, they have made one. Sayagyi has an update on this as well as the backstory. He joins us now.
Sayagyi, thank you so much for joining us today. We appreciate you being here.
Speaker 1: Thanks for having me.
Speaker 0: Well, this story is absolutely shocking along with what happened to you and the update. So pardon me. We've just gone through a bit of a backstory there about what the UK government wanted access to. And, really, this all started with the Online Safety Act of 2023, and they've been very, you know, incrementally creeping into people's lives. But now we have an update as to Apple's response.
Talk us through it.
Speaker 1: Well, you know, we had a situation February 8 where The Wall Street Journal published what was supposed to be a very private matter, which was the UK government was compelling Apple to basically create a backdoor so they could access the world's encrypted iCloud data. So any any country in the world, theoretically, the UK government would have had access to the advanced data protection services they offer, which most people don't use, but at least gave users the ability to have their key stored offline. So, you know, you don't have to trust that Apple or a government is playing by the rules and keeping your data safe and private.
Speaker 0: Right. And so Apple wasn't even allowed to talk about this. And then The UK sorry. Apple could've was was given two options, basically. Do they just withdraw all of their services altogether out of The UK, or do they remove advanced data protection?
So talk to us about the response from Apple.
Speaker 1: Yeah. The crazy thing is, right, The UK's investigatory powers act of 02/2016 basically enabled them to say, Apple, you cannot even share the fact that we're gonna basically force you to create a backdoor into the world's ostensibly encrypted data. So it was leaked, and, thankfully, The Wall Street Journal got it out. In fact, as you know, on February 8, Elon retweeted my post about it because he said this is crazy. This is absolutely insane because people just don't realize that the governments of the world have this ability, and The UK is obviously the one leading the charge as far as tyrannical overreach and and laying claim to your communications as well as actually adjudicating and criminalizing certain speech, which were is protected here in this country.
But their UK online safety bill actually gives them, in theory, extradition power so they could basically say, as a US citizen, you're violating our UK speech laws, and we're gonna prosecute you prosecute you. They even stated that recently. A UK Police Commissioner threatened to extradite US citizens over online posts. He said, we'll come after you.
Speaker 0: Yes. Yes. I I remember that. And then The US response was basically shove it. We have a First Amendment.
But, you know, other people across the world don't have those same protections, so they were talking about extraditing people from other countries as well. And, of course, we have a precedent set with the case of Julian Assange when it comes to extraditing people to to foreign countries all within this Five Eyes network, it seems. So talk to us about that link and how this is all sort of creeping into that entire Five Eyes network.
Speaker 1: Absolutely. So the Five Eyes network is a really big concern here because, essentially, if I'm a US citizen, I go to The UK. At this point, my if I upload something to the cloud, The UK Government has access to all of that. So there's no protection. Now there could have been protection with the advanced data protection services, which are now gone, and The UK can share that with The US, and that's the intelligence sharing agreements among the Five Eyes nations.
Right? Australia, New Zealand, Canada, The US, and The UK, essentially violating all of our civil rights, our privacy protections, and our constitution here in The US. So that's been ongoing. Now that this issue has come out to the forefront, I think it's really important for people to appreciate how important, for example, x is in helping to wrench back some of these rights and give us a platform to speak truthfully. That said, they're noting everything that's being said, and they're trying to use that as a way to essentially, again, criminalize free speech.
Speaker 0: Yes. You're right. And it's kind of a double edged sword because what you say will be used against you. But at the same time, if you don't speak about it, then it'll be used against you anyway. So the the I for for me, the option's always bravery.
But I'm interested in your thoughts about how Apple responded because they really were faced with these two very difficult options. And, essentially, people are saying they should have just pulled out their service from The UK, and people would have been outraged at this. And then they could have, you know, protested and maybe repealed some of these laws or, you know, whatever measures the the citizens of The UK could have taken are now essentially being taken away from them. They don't even have an option for privacy, albeit the advanced data protection was not used that much. But without that, then, essentially, there's no encrypt encryption anyway, so it kind of allows governments to use the data anyway now.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Exactly. So WhatsApp and Signal already threatened to leave The UK if something similar was forced upon them. And so I think Apple made the right decision. If they had pulled all iCloud services from The UK, I think that would have probably crashed their civilization for quite some time.
But I do think that they may have not done a good enough job of of really pushing back and and speaking openly about this because the gag order, you know, that that is imposed upon them is so egregious that they they would have potentially given access to the world's encrypted data and violated the law if they spoke up about it. Well, at this point, you know, we had to all face being deplatformed or worse by speaking up about some of the nightmares that unfolded with the COVID, you know, you know, pandemic, if you will. And now entire big tech corporations, multinationals are having to do the same as well. So it's really quite a moment for us all to be in the same you know, we're in the same boat here. We all have to do something, corporations, individuals, to stop, as you said, bravery is the solution, this insane reenactment of seditious libel.
You know? The crown is literally trying to exert total control over the world and over speech and turning it into a weapon against the people, that's similar to having your tongue cut out or your head cut off for speaking against the government narrative. You know? That's where we're at right now.
Speaker 0: We are. The and we see, you know, insane laws across every single western nation except The US, really. Australia's recent hate speech laws, now they're bringing in anti vilification laws across states. Basically, now if someone says something that someone deems offensive, they can go to prison. There is a new, bill that was introduced again without debate.
Seven years mandatory sentence if you say something, quote, unquote, reckless. It's it's it's really unbelievable. And what's interesting about this UK case, Sayer, is that The UK Investigatory Powers Act of 02/2016 was used in order for the British government to issue this secret order to Apple that they weren't even allowed to talk about. What what I find so fascinating about this is how long this has been in the works. That means that back in 02/2016, someone, some lawmaker said, you know, we're gonna be able to use this legislation later to weaponize.
Look how look how far ahead they planned. This is nine years ago. And so I think the the point is that people really need to pay attention to some of these laws that are being introduced. You and I have previously spoken about the COSA legislation in The United States. We have to be aware of these laws and oppose them so that they can't be weaponized against us nine years later.
Speaker 1: Absolutely. I'm glad you bring a COSA because it turns out that one of the primary proponents and, if you will, backdoor architects of COSA is the same organization that was behind the online safety bill, which is the Center for Countering Digital Hate. So, basically, this organization, their CEO, Imram Ahmed, literally was found in a leaked memo to have been involved in setting a black ops, these are his words, on a presidential candidate, which is RFK junior, are now acting, you know, HHS secretary. That is such an egregious thing for for it to have been discovered. In fact, CCDH was also involved in placing political operatives in this country through Morgan McSweeney, their founder, who was a a, you know, adviser to Kirstarmer as well as to the to Harris.
So we have the infiltration of our, you know, election integrity, you know, political process that that actually goes back to 02/2021. This is the one report that has not been discussed in the mainstream media that, thankfully, because of your journalism and Vigilant Fox and others, the information is getting out. But there was an America First legal lawsuit against the CDC which discovered that in 02/2021, the UK's counter disinformation unit gave a interagency master class on censorship, right, to the US National Security Council's interagency policy committee. The FBI, CISA was there, USAID, army, navy. I mean, you you can't make this stuff up.
And they literally decided they were gonna deploy what is essentially a weapons grade AI system that was, used in, for example, Twitter Twitter one point o to, automatically, track, you know, the the speech of every single user and then start start associating terms like questioning mass with the word Nazi, basically labeling that anti Semitic speech, and then just deplatforming people automatically. Anyone with 5,000 followers or less. This was going on. Millions of Americans had their speech suppressed and their, you know, behavior tracked. It's probably still in the dossier somewhere, right, by the UK government.
They literally infected our executive branch and then deployed these weapons grade systems in the big tech stack that essentially violated the rights of all Americans, not just the so called disinfo dozen, which I'm proud to be on the list now. And so this is what was going on. They were literally trying to take over our government. They succeeded in large part, but now, of course, as we can see, there was a huge mandate of the people. We have a new administration.
We even have an executive order now protecting us against this very thing, thankfully.
Speaker 2: Yes.
Speaker 1: So we are turning the tide, But thanks to reporting like this, the context is global. There was in that PowerPoint, it was stated clearly there were 20 plus bilateral engagements with countries, including the Five Eyes network. It was also g seven in order to implement a global plan to shut down free speech and do exactly what we're observing the UK government to be doing right now.
Speaker 0: Yes. It's really interesting, and I think a a lot of people are starting to realize just how much the UK government had to do with all of this. The the report that you're talking about being a crucial part during COVID, just how deeply involved they were with the censorship. You just look at, they them deploying members of their own government to come to The US during election season to lobby for Kamala Harris. I still think that's foreign interference.
I I don't understand how that was allowed to occur. But, you know, it's it's one thing to show support. It's another thing to go and actively lobby. I mean, anyway, I just wanna know from you about this hack that you experienced right after. So so you tweet this information.
It gets shared by Elon Musk. I think it had 18,000,000 views or or if I'm not mistaken. And then you get hacked almost immediately after.
Speaker 1: It was crazy. That morning, I just happened to be looking at my phone twenty three seconds after he reposted the story that we're discussing. And within a matter of a few minutes, I had on my account these strange crypto posts. You know, it was promoting some kind of, like, scam coin. And I I quickly went in, changed my settings, was able to get the password to change, and somehow recovered my account.
But just few minutes before that, I had just finished the, process of getting my own advanced data protection services activated through my phone because I didn't even know it existed either until the story came up. It turns out my partner is a UK citizen, And when she confirmed that she was the, you know, the backup to my account, somehow my account got hacked right at that moment. So I think it had to do with that, and it's very strange, right, that it had to do with my private key being transmitted basically to a UK citizen, and suddenly my account was hacked. It hasn't happened in fifteen years.
Speaker 0: Wow.
Speaker 1: I've been on Twitter for fifteen years.
Speaker 0: That is that is absolutely fascinating. And it's interesting because, you know, you say it's a whole bunch of crypto scammers we know full well. I mean okay. We theorize full well that intelligence agencies, and governments are utilizing bots and scammer accounts to actually target dissidents. This is one of their ways.
You know, you post something controversial, and immediately you have bots in your replies or liking your stuff to suppress your content. This is a this is a known tactic. In in my opinion, we don't have hard evidence for it, but it's a clear pattern that a lot of users have reported. So I wonder whether it was the fact that you were drawing attention to this that maybe, some shady characters were involved in that. Very, very interesting.
Well, Sayar, as you mentioned, the tide is really turning, and more and more people are growing aware of this. What should people be doing now?
Speaker 1: Well, we have legislation in this country that's modeled after The UK online safety bill and the EU Digital Services Act, which basically strips from us the privacy protections and rights that we have that are conferred to us by our beautiful constitution. So, unfortunately, Linda and Elon have actually endorsed the latest kids online safety bill even though the Center for Countering Digital Hate, which Elon is suing, right, and who's you know, tried to make it their purpose to destroy myself and other Americans for speaking up. They actually don't seem to realize that they are part of the agenda, which was revealed in the black ops memo, kill Elon's Twitter being the top line item for the year, and
Speaker 2: then
Speaker 1: trigger legislative regulation right underneath. This is actually part of that agenda, and there's about eight bills sponsored right now which would strip our basic rights under the ages of where you need to protect protect children, right, from from online harm. That is the way in which they have tried to legislate, lobby, affect PR, which is, again, CCDH is an unregistered foreign agent at the very least for the fact that that is their intention. They've made it very clear, and they're being allowed to run rogue. Last thing I'll say on that is that Imran Ahmed is supposed to receive an award by the Elevate Foundation Prize in Miami, May Twelfth To The Fourteenth.
Three Hundred Thousand Dollars unrestricted and this prestigious prize for doing what? It's just amazing that they're basically getting replatformed in this country when they're subject to all of these congressional inquiries, lawsuits, DOJ complaints. This this is absurd. I really hope that people can sign the petition I put together, which is to oppose this absurd aggrandizement of someone who has completely attempted to annihilate our freedoms here in this country.
Speaker 0: Where do people find that petition?
Speaker 1: That's actually on change.org, and I I can give you a link to it. And it's, you know, just absurd that this would be allowed to happen, and that organization would would confer this kind of prestige and just shower him with cash for essentially targeting our our own political candidates and interfering with our elections. I mean, it's really ridiculous.
Speaker 0: Yes, please. If you send that link, we'll make sure to share it around as well when we post this so that people can actually get involved. We we've gotta stay on top of this, say, what just happened in The UK is absolutely egregious. But, really, there are a lot of bad actors everywhere in the world that are trying to do the same thing to every country. Essentially, they wanna erase privacy, make everything the government basically invade every area of your lives, big tech invade every area of your lives, and we can't allow that to happen.
Thank you so much. Saya, please let people know where they can follow you.
Speaker 1: Thanks so much. Yeah. Basically, I still do most of my reporting GreenMedInfo.com. And, of course, on X, you can find me, Sayer G. I love to post these sorts of updates in real time.
Speaker 0: Fantastic. Well, that is the X account at Sayer G, and the links for his websites are on there. Saya, thank you so much for your time. We really appreciate you being here.
Speaker 1: Thanks so much, and I I really appreciate the work you're doing to, re replatform the Fifth Estate so that we can continue to have actual free speech in this country and the world. So thank you for that.
Speaker 0: Appreciate you. Talk soon. Thanks. Well, we are very grateful for people like Sayagyi who are committed to bringing the truth and building a better future for humanity. And speaking of building a better future, our food supply is absolutely crucial to achieving that goal.
Did you know that over 85% of the grass fed beef in stores is imported? That's because the country of origin labeling law was repealed in 2015. So now meat can be packaged here in The US and earn a product of USA label even if it was born, raised, and harvested overseas. And the truth is much of the meat on the grocery store shelves is filled with things you don't want, from antibiotics, hormones, questionable origins, and even harmful seed oils. But at Good Ranchers, transparency isn't just a buzzword.
It is a promise. All products at Good Ranchers have trustworthy ingredients. Their meat is born, raised, and harvested right here in The USA, so you know exactly where it comes from. It's free from hidden additives. There are no antibiotics ever, no added hormones, and no seed oils.
Just one simple ingredient that you can read, and that's meat. Jermaine Gill, the chief growth officer of Good Ranches, explains what you need to know about the current state of the meat market. He joins us now. Jermaine, thank you so much for joining us today. We appreciate you being here.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Thank you, Maria. Anytime we get a chance to, you know, talk about Good Ranchers and talk about agriculture, here at Good Ranchers, we always always wanna take that opportunity. So thank you, and thank you for being an advocate for, the local farms and ranches here in The US. I know it's important to you.
It's important subject to us, so thank you.
Speaker 0: It's absolutely important to me. This is preserving our food supply and the integrity of our food supply is paramount, And I don't think people really realize that until the food supply actually is at risk. And it is at risk all over the world. There is an attack specifically on farmers. There's an attack on meat, on protein.
And so we wanna talk about, the integrity as well of the meat that people are getting when they go to good ranches. This is this is so important. So talk to us about the fact that when people go to the supermarket, they don't actually know for sure that their meat is coming from America.
Speaker 2: Yeah. In 2015, the US government passed a country of origin labeling law that says that it's called the coal law. So it says that beef and pork in The US doesn't have to actually be born and raised, harvested here to be called product of The USA. So you can see that a stamp on some ground beef, and it'll have the American flag, and it says product USA. All it has to do is be further processed here in the country.
So that means that it can be born, raised, harvested in another country, you know, Mexico, Uruguay, Latin America, South America. Those are the big places that we see a lot. Canada too. We see a lot of beef imported in from those other countries. And then it's either, you know, processed, meaning, like, cutting the steaks or ground up here in The US, and it now becomes called the product of The USA.
Yeah. So, I mean, it's kinda it's very misleading. Right? Because, honest you know, The US is the best grower of beef chicken pork in the world. Right?
We do the best job. We set all of the standards for animal husbandry, animal right, how we treat the animal, all of these things. You know, The US Agriculture is when it sets the standard for those things. And and so we pride ourselves on being the best growers. And it's kinda sad to see that because of this law, there's you know, almost 3,000,000,000 pounds of of beef have been imported into The US Wow.
Over the or, like, last 2024. And so the regular American consumer doesn't even know. Right? They they trust that little American flag, that product USA labeling. And then in a bind, they don't realize, you know, that they can't tell where the meat has come from.
That's why I had good ranch go ahead. I'm sorry. Go ahead.
Speaker 0: Well, no. I I just wanted to say this is so, so important. People need to realize how how vital this is because we recently have an example out of The UK domain where there was a huge backlash over Beauvais ten. Now for people that aren't aware of that, this is can be a very, very dangerous additive, and the studies initial studies show that it can cause things like infertility and maybe even cancer. And so there was a backlash in The UK over this being inside dairy products.
And so what they started to do was hide the the manufacturer, so from other products so that people wouldn't be aware that they were purchasing something that had beauveur in it, and you guarantee there's no beauveur in the meat. Right?
Speaker 2: Yeah. No Beauvaeh. Yeah. We we've worked really hard, and and so our our our founder has been in Corley Spell. When they started the company, they started out of the need and desire to know where their where their meat was coming from.
Right? They had started a family, and they started to do some more research and digging into, like, what the meat industry looked like in The US. And so out of the desire for a clean product, vaccine free products, products that they know that they could trust and that they could feed their family, that's where Good Ranchers came from. And so the heart and soul of who we are is it's two parts. Right?
It's it's one, we want we always wanna support the American farm and rancher. I mean, I I I know I don't know if you know this, but, you know, ranches and farms, the small local are closing left and right because of imported beef and this, you know, big farm, big beef industry, big meat industry. So, one, we wanna support those guys. That's part of our mission. It's part of our heart.
We wanna, you know, bring advocacy to them. We wanna tell their stories. We wanna be able to support them. Right? And so we've done that over the last seven years of of being in business.
We've really done that. The other piece to the heart and soul of who we are is this the idea of a clean product, product that you can trust. And, you know, a hundred years ago that's when I was just telling this story to somebody earlier today. About a hundred years ago, if you were, you know, here in The US, you wanted to get, you know, chicken or beef, you would just, you know, go down the street to your local rancher and farm. You would meet the rancher and farm.
Right? You would set up some you'd buy directly from them or from, like, a small butcher shop that had that connection. Well, as cities have grown, we've lost that connection. Right? We're we're no longer connected to our our food supply.
Right? We we don't know where it's coming from. We don't know what is and a lot of us don't have time to really go and do the research. That's why, you know, trusting a company like Good Ranchers, we go out there. We do the research for you.
We make sure it's a clean product. We make sure it's a product that we would feed ourselves. Been in correlating myself. We do the same thing. There we would never sell anything that we wouldn't feed to our own family.
And so, you know, you don't have the time to go find those ranchers and those farmers, and let us go do the sourcing for you. That that's sort of that's that is who we are. Right? So let us do the sourcing. Let's make sure that the product's clean, the cleanest it can be, so that you can know and have trust that what you're feeding your family is it's it's supporting local farms and ranches in The US, and it's a clean product.
Speaker 0: Well, this is what what you do at Good Ranchers is so important, Jermaine, because we have to keep those local farmers and those local ranches alive. Like I said, there is a sort of coordinated global attack on them. And whilst that may be different under the new administration, we have to keep their business going. We have to you know, we hope to see changes, and we hope to see farmers supported, but we have to keep that momentum going because you just look at how, over the years, not supporting local farms and, you know, just buying from supermarkets where you can't be certain of where your meat is from, and it's all sort of, you know, big business, big ag rather than the the grassroots people that actually care about the quality of the meat. Over the years, that's allowed many of them to be attacked, to be overregulated, you know, with you know, if you don't upgrade to this smart ag, which costs millions of dollars, you're gonna be shut down.
We really have to put in effort to advocate for these businesses because this is our food. This is our strength. This is what keeps our families healthy. And let me just say, Jermaine, I'm gonna tell you, you know, I'm from Australia originally. I'm in I'm in America now, but when I was there, we we have incredible meat in Australia, and I I partnered as well with a company that does similar things to what Good Ranches does in Australia, and their meat was fantastic.
And I came to The US, and I just couldn't find tasty meat anywhere. And then I tried Good Ranches, and it is good. It is very, very delicious. I will tell you that openly. And so I I think it's it's a fantastic option for people.
What what are some other really important points for you?
Speaker 2: Yeah. I mean, for us, you know you know, tariffs is a big thing that everybody are talking about right now. Right? And so, you know, one of the things that we we drew a line in the sand very early on in the company was that not only was our meat gonna be born, raised, and harvested in The US, but our whole supply chain was gonna be a % US based. So that's why when you're gonna see rising cost of meat products in the grocery store, the butcher shop, other online meat companies that are importing products in from overseas, you're not gonna see that same rising cost with us because we've we've already secured our whole supply chain to be a % American.
So, you know, as you start to get that, like, pricing sensitivity, right, people are gonna start and and and we're we see it now. Right? We talk about it. It's all over the news. Right?
Price of eggs are increasing. Price of ground beef is increasing. Everything. You're gonna see it we see it all over the place now. You know, when you buy from good ranchers, you can be secure that your price is gonna be it's gonna stay the same for why you're with us as well as you know, we're always we always wanna give back.
We always wanna give value back to our customers. So, like, one of the things that we're running right now is, like, free meat for a year. Right? So, you know, free you get to choose ground beef, chicken, salmon, whatever, you know, whatever product you want. And we're gonna give you a portion of that for free for a year.
So, you know, not like I said, we're we're trying to give back to not just local farms and ranches, but to the American family. Right? Or, you know, part of our goal is to bring people to the table. And so we know that, you know, there is some fear or, you know, hesitancy there with pricing and concern that the price of beef and price of meat is gonna continue to rise. You know, with good ranchers, we're here to help.
Right? And so we've kind of got ahead of the whole tariff thing. Right? And there's this, you know, movement to bring American meat, right, to buy American. And so, that's what we've been doing since we started.
Right? And so we're we're happy to be a part of the solution, right, and a part of the answer.
Speaker 0: Well, I'm really grateful for that. I I applaud your mission. I really do. We have to support local farms, local branches. This is one of the most important things that we have to do because our food supply is at the core of our health.
Like, it's it's that simple. Yeah. And so and I really I
Speaker 2: will say I will say one.
Speaker 0: Go on.
Speaker 2: Yeah. I'll say one thing. You know, you don't have to sacrifice quality and taste for clean and and, you know, chopping your values. Right? Like, our prod like you said it earlier, I I I mean, I've we've had beef from all over now.
The best. You know? And I will hands down put Good Ranchers a Good Ranchers product up against any other thing. You know, we we not only are we, like, trying to source the cleanest thing, but we age all of our beef, you know, a minimum of 28. Our chicken is all small, but we have a internal saying, and it's kinda funny.
People will come for the steak, but they stay for the chicken because our chicken is just so phenomenal.
Speaker 0: Is good.
Speaker 2: You think, like, all chicken is right. It's all made the same, but our chicken just you you can taste the difference. It's it's more tender. It's got a little bit of a different flavor profile to it. It's a smaller it's not those gigantic pterodactyl sized chicken breasts you're gonna see at the grocery store.
It's pumped full of hormones. It's a smaller chicken breast. So, like, you know, it it's phenomenal. I I I would just say our our product, you don't have to sacrifice quality or taste.
Speaker 0: Well, what I really
Speaker 2: and and and do right.
Speaker 0: Absolutely. And what I really love as well is that it comes in portions. So when you're buying meat from the supermarket, you might get a whole bunch of unwanted parts that you're paying for but throwing out where Good Ranchers gets all those portions for you. You're actually getting what you pay for, And then it's easier for meal prep as well. So there's just so many benefits, Jermaine.
I I, again, love the meat. I'm I'm going to be regularly buying it. I recently tried it. I love it. It's great.
You can taste the the quality of the meat. And just knowing as well that we're supporting local local farmers and ranchers is number one. This needs to become, you know, really the the motto of America going forward. The motto of every country, really. You have to support your farmers and your ranchers.
You have to. It's it's it's paramount to our existence. And so and and the added benefit of the value add that you're giving to your customers as well because you're not just giving back to the businesses, but also to your customers is just wonderful. So thank you so much for your time today, Jermaine. I really appreciate it.
This is how you can be sure of the safety and the quality of your meat by purchasing from Good Ranchers Direct. Thank you so much, Jermaine.
Speaker 2: Thank you. Thanks for having us. And, again, like I said, Maria, thank you for your support. Thank you for, highlighting the needs of us ranchers, farmers out there. And, you know, you we cannot stress this enough.
Like, securing a great of your food supply, understanding where your meat come from, and finding a trusted provider is so important. It's it you know, we it's like we're feeding our future, really, honestly. Right? Because, you know, what we put in our bodies is important. So thank you for trusting Good Ranchers.
Appreciate it. Thanks so much.
Speaker 0: Appreciate you. Thank you.
Speaker 2: Thanks. You have a great day.
Speaker 0: Huge thanks to Jermaine Gill and Good Ranchers for sponsoring the show and offering a truly clean, transparent meat service that supports our values and the good of humanity. And speaking of clean food, I have exciting news. Good Ranch's seed oil free chicken nuggets are back. Made with whole cuts of chicken, they're gluten free, allergen safe, and packed with delicious clean flavor. You can subscribe to a box or add them to any order at GoodRanches.com/VNN.
But here's the best part. Good Ranches delivers straight to your door, skipping the grocery store and offering farm to table transparency. Right now, when you subscribe to any box at Good Ranches, you'll get free ground beef, chicken breasts, or wild caught salmon for a full year plus $25 off when you use the code VNN at checkout. Don't miss out on the pleasure of eating top quality meat. Go to GoodRanchers.com/VNN and use code VNN to get free meat for a year and $25 off your order.
We love their services, and we think you will too.
Sign the Petition
I am one of the many who have experienced defamation, deplatforming, and lawfare at the hands of Imran Ahmed and his organization, CCDH. They have targeted me and twelve others they labeled the "disinformation dozen" for merely expressing narratives different from theirs, challenging our very right to free speech, fairness, and open debate. The Elevate Prize Foundation's decision to award Imran Ah
change.org
reSee.it AI Summary
I’ve faced the most massive, globally coordinated propaganda campaign in the history of the Western world. Governments of many Western nations have turned military-grade psychological operations—strategies, tactics, technologies, and capabilities—against their own citizens. These are inconvenient facts. The world we believed existed no longer exists, if it ever did. Credit: @RWMaloneMD @OracleFilmsUK
@wideawake_media - Wide Awake Media
Dr. Robert Malone on Covid: "You have been subjected to the most massive... globally coordinated propaganda campaign in the history of the Western world". "With this campaign, the governments of many Western nation-states have turned military-grade psychological operations strategies, tactics, technologies and capabilities—developed for modern military combat—against their own citizens." "These are inconvenient facts. The world that many of us believed existed no longer exists, if it ever did." Credit: @RWMaloneMD @OracleFilmsUK
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker argues that in true fifth generation warfare, you do not know who your opponent is. The question is raised: who is responsible for the puppet master behind the COVID crisis? Is it Klaus, Biden, Tony Fauci, or someone above Klaus? The claim is that these are all surrogates, and that the true manager of the message behind the crisis is unknown. This, the speaker asserts, defines fifth generation warfare.
Over the last three years, the speaker contends, western governments, non governmental organizations, transnational organizations, pharmaceutical industry corporations, media and financial corporations have cooperated via public private partnerships, which the speaker says is a euphemism for fascism, to deploy the most massive globally harmonized psychological and propaganda operation in the history of the world.
The speaker further states that during the last three years, the audience has been subjected to the most massive harmonized globally coordinated propaganda campaign in the history of the Western world, with a decisive effect: governments of many Western nation states have turned to military grade psychological operations strategies, tactics, technologies, and capabilities developed for modern military combat against their own citizens.
These are presented as inconvenient facts. The speaker concludes that the world many people believed existed no longer exists if it ever did.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In true fifth generation warfare, you do not know who your opponent is. Example. Who is responsible for who's the puppet master behind the COVID crisis as we've experienced it. Who is it? Anybody here know?
Was it Klaus? No. There's something above Klaus. Was it Biden? Was it Tony Fauci?
These are all surrogates. K? You don't really know who is managing the message that has been propagated on you. That's fifth generation warfare. Over the last three years, western governments, non governmental organizations, transnational organizations, pharmaceutical industry corporations, media and financial corporations have cooperated via public private partnerships, which I assert is a euphemism for fascism, to deploy the most massive globally harmonized psychological and propaganda operation in the history of the world.
K? Over the last three years, you have been subjected to the most massive harmonized globally coordinated propaganda campaign in the history of the Western world, full stop. With this campaign, the governments of many Western nation states have turned k. This is key. Military grade psychological operations strategies, tactics, technologies, and capabilities developed for modern military combat against their own citizens.
These are inconvenient facts. The world that many of us believed existed no longer exists if it ever did.
reSee.it AI Summary
How can I trust someone amplified by the biggest outlets, feeding me alternative versions to trap me in the narrative? It’s obvious if I step back. If I really want to understand the theatre, I’ll watch my series urgently and stop being played https://realityrevolt.com
@reality_revolt_ - Dimitri Legrand
How can you trust someone who is constantly amplified by the biggest media outlets? Someone who feeds you the alternative version just to keep you trapped inside the narrative. It’s obvious if you step back. If you really want to understand the theatre, watch my series urgently and stop being played https://realityrevolt.com
Video Transcript AI Summary
They argue that Candace and Charlie are not being killed; they claim the protests place people where the system wants them, making them participate and play a role in a scripted scenario. Without conflict, there is no attention; without attention, they cannot be controlled. Politics is described as a form of catch or wrestling, with roles that are always written in advance. If Erika is caricatured and not credible, it is intentional, resulting in people being drawn toward Candace. Belief that one is awake because they rejected the official version leads them into the alternative version, the one tolerated by the opposition. Charlie is said to have been betrayed for asking too many questions, and the phrases often cited by supporters are that “they” know everyone is in the same club, and that Charlie did not die, causing the game to collapse.
The speaker notes that an hologram and a shirt lifting before impact were observed. They claim that Trump’s ear was never touched. Days is described as keeping people inside, channeling their anger and locking in their position. Like Trump and Erika, she is primarily an actress, and her friend Roussel is described as a comedian. They are actors who create headlines on major channels.
A genuine figure is said not to make CNN headlines, because if you truly disturb the system, you are not talked about. While people remain distracted, the real threat advances. The replacement of politics by an algorithm is asserted as the true shift, and Candace is said not to denounce this development.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Ils ne vont pas tuer Candace et ils n'ont même pas tué Charlie. Quand tu protestes, tu es là où le système te veut, tu participes, tu joues un rôle dans leur scénario. Sans conflit, pas d'attention. Sans ton attention, ils ne te contrôlent pas. La politique, c'est du catch.
Les rôles sont toujours écrits à l'avance. Si Erika est caricaturale et pas crédible, c'est volontaire. Résultat, tu es poussé dans les bras de Candace. Tu crois être éveillé parce que tu as rejeté la version officielle, mais tu tombes pile dans la version alternative, celle de l'opposition tolérée. Charlie s'est fait trahir, il posait trop de questions, voilà les phrases que tu aimes, mais quand on sait qu'ils sont tous dans le même club et que Charlie n'est pas mort, alors le jeu s'effondre.
Pourtant on a vu l'hologramme et le t-shirt se soulever avant l'impact. On a compris que l'oreille de Trump n'a jamais été touchée. Mais quand Days vous maintient à l'intérieur, elle canalise votre colère et verrouille votre position. Comme Trump et Erika, elle est avant tout une actrice et son amie Roussel avant tout comédien. Ils sont des acteurs qui font les headlines sur les grandes chaînes.
Un vrai ne fait pas la une de CNN parce que si tu déranges vraiment, on ne parle pas de toi. Et pendant que tu restes distrait, la vraie menace se met en place. Le remplacement de la politique par l'algorithme. Et ça, Candace ne le dénonce pas.
Reality revolt
realityrevolt.com
@DefiyantlyFree - Insurrection Barbie
“American people are the most propagandized people in the whole world and they don’t even know it.” This clip is brutally honest. https://t.co/eG8HsY7Rxg
@tomselliott - Tom Elliott
Covid Retrospective Series, Vol. 1 Media: The Unvaccinated Are Scum
@tomselliott - Tom Elliott
Online: https://news.grabien.com/story-covid-retrospective-vol-1-media-the-unvaccinated-are-scum IG: https://www.instagram.com/reel/CsJc-ZpOtjJ/?igshid=MzRlODBiNWFlZA== Youtube: https://youtu.be/tpuo4IYG0uA
[Covid Retrospective, Vol. 1] Media: The Unvaccinated Are Scum
‘You are unvaccinated, you are the problem’
news.grabien.com
Instagram
instagram.com