reSee.it - Related Post Feed

LouDobbs
Posted - November 16, 2020 at 10:45 PM
Saved - July 30, 2024 at 11:42 PM

@LouDobbs - Lou Dobbs

Electoral Fraud: @SidneyPowell1 says she has firsthand evidence that Smartmatic voting software was designed in a way to change the vote of a voter without being detected #MAGA #AmericaFirst #Dobbs https://t.co/lP5PmSgTu1

Video Transcript AI Summary
Dominion Voting System bid for Philadelphia's voting machines contract in 2018, but redacted foreign connections info. Trump's executive order against foreign election interference raises questions. Sidney Powell reveals evidence of Smartmatic software manipulation in Venezuela. Smartmatic chairman is on Biden's transition team. CIA involvement suspected. FBI reportedly investigating election. Concerns raised about state-run elections and vote manipulation. Powell criticizes government inaction. Election integrity questioned. Willful blindness to corruption alleged. President Trump committed to uncovering truth.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: News now. Documents show that Dominion Voting System submitted a bid to the city of Philadelphia in 2018 to be considered as their contractor for voting machines. Those same documents reveal very little about the company's foreign connections. When asked by the city to list any foreign ownership or investors in either the parent company and or its subsidiaries, Dominion had something to say, but nothing to show. The section you see there on your screen is entirely redacted, blacked out because Dominion ultimately was denied the contract. In just 3 months before Dominion's bid, President Trump signed an executive order against foreign interference in our elections. In that order, President Trump wrote quote, the assessment shall identify to the maximum extent ascertainable the nature of any foreign intervention interference and any methods employed to execute it, the persons involved, and the foreign government or governments that authorized, directed, information to the President. The question is, was the President ever informed of this attempted bid by a company with foreign ties? And why are they being so secretive? Joining us now by phone, Sydney Powell, a member of President Trump's legal team. She is also general Michael Flynn's attorney, former federal prosecutor, best selling author, one of the country's most prominent appellate attorneys. Sydney, good to have you with us. Dominion Voting System seems to be figuring larger and larger in the interest of your your legal team, and what is the latest? Speaker 1: Oh, definitely, Lou. I've just gotten some stunning evidence from a firsthand witness, a high ranking military officer who was present when Smartmatic was designed in a way that the, and I'm gonna just read you some of these statements, if you don't mind, so I'll get them exactly right from from the affidavit. Designed in a way that the system could change the vote of each voter without being detected. He wanted the software itself to function in such a manner that if the voter were to place their thumbprint or fingerprint on a scanner, then the thumbprint would be tied to a record of the voter's name and identity of as having voted, but that voter would not be tracked to the changed vote. He made it clear that the system would have to be set up but not leave any evidence of the changed vote for a specific voter and that there would be no evidence to show and nothing to contradict that the name or the fingerprint or thumbprint was going with a changed vote. Smartmatic agreed to create such a system and produce the software and hardware that accomplished the result for president Chavez. After the Smartmatic electrical manage electoral management system was put in place, he closely observed several elections where the results were manipulated using the Smartmatic software. One such election was December 2006 when Chavez was running against Rosales. Chavez won with a landslide over Rosales, a margin of nearly 6,000,000 votes for Chavez versus 3,700,000 for Rosales. In 2013, he witnessed another Venezuelan national election where the Smartmatic management system was used to manipulate and change the results for Chavez. And it it goes on and on. He was in the current control room where multiple digital display screens were shown for results and voting. The actual voting results were fed into that room and onto the displays over an Internet feed, which was connected to a sophisticated computer system created by Smartmatic. People in that room were able to see in real time whether the votes that came through the electronic voting system was in their favor or against them. If one looked at any particular screen that could determine that the vote from any specific area or as a national total was going to be against either candidate. Persons controlling the vote tabulation computer had the ability to change the reporting of votes by moving votes from one candidate to another by using the Smartmatic software. Speaker 0: And Smartmatic, the relation Smartmatic The city I yes. And, Smartmatic, the the chairman, is admiral, Pete, Neffenger, who is also transition team. That's an extraordinary situation as well, isn't it? Speaker 1: Yes. It is. So here's the other kicker. When the smart machines are when somebody's losing, like, for example, when Maduro and his supporters realized the size of the other guys' lead, they were worried that they were in crisis mode and would lose the election. The Smartmatic machines used for voting in each state were connected to the Internet, reported their information over the Internet to the Caracas control center real time, so the decision was made to reset the entire system. Maduro's and his supporters ordered the network controllers to take the Internet itself offline in practically all parts in Venezuela to change the result. It took the voting operators approximately 2 hours to make the adjustments in the vote from Radomski to Madero. Then when they turned the Internet back on and the online reporting was up and running again, they checked each screen state by state to be certain they could see each vote was changed in favor of Madero. Speaker 0: Sydney, you tweeted earlier, today about CIA and its association. What have you discovered there? Speaker 1: Well, other than the fact there's no way all this was happening over around and around the world without the CIA knowing about it. I mean, that's just logic. It's been this affidavit also explains it's been used to change election results all over the world, and it's all Venezuelan and Cuban and essentially communist money that's been doing this. It's a foreign owned company, as you mentioned earlier. The president of it is mister Neffenger, who is on Biden's very presumptuous and immediately failing transition team. And people have been reporting this to our government for for several years, including Democrats, and nobody's done a damn thing about it, Lou. I can't even express how furious I am over this. Speaker 0: Well, I I I share your your your fury and frustration, but I do have some news to break here at this moment. I have, now, received word from a, highly reliable source that the FBI does have an investigative team that is now, looking into this election. Now what that means beyond that, but at least it's confirmation that they are investigating, and we'll see what, moves because there had been no indication that indeed publicly that they were involved, they are now. To that point, I'd just like to show if we could put up the full screen under what, their authorities are when we talk about these state run elections, even though they're federal elections, for at least the, a a sizable number of the candidates. As you see there, the ballot includes 1 or more federal candidates, an election of polling place, official took action. Your thoughts? Speaker 1: Well, my other thought is that as soon as the Smartmatic system changed the votes that they wanted for their desired candidate, By the time they finish, they achieve a convincing but narrow victory of a certain number of votes they want for their candidate. This person saw Yeah. By what his own experience exactly what was happening there, what's happening here. Speaker 0: It's, it is a deeply, deeply troubling, election. As I said earlier, the worst in this country's history, bar none. And we have seen official, official investigative and justice, department, officials slow to move, and it is infuriating to everyone. The president tonight Speaker 1: willful blindness. They have adopted a position of willful blindness to this massive corruption across the country. And the Smartmatic software is in the DNA of every vote tabulating company software and system. Speaker 0: Yes. And it is, it is more than just a willful blindness. This is people trying to blind us to what is going on. We don't even know who the hell really owns, these companies at least most of them. That's gotta change and we've gotta find out exactly what's going on. And thank God we've got a president who will stay in the fight all the way through until we get those answers. Sidney Powell, thanks so much. We appreciate
DominiqueRebel
Posted - December 15, 2020 at 2:24 AM
Saved - September 19, 2023 at 11:59 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Thoma Bravo's involvement raises concerns. Entrust, owned by Joe Sullivan, connects to CyberTrust and DigiCert, both acquired by Thoma Bravo. Astonishingly, these entities verify elections nationwide. Sullivan, linked to Uber's data breach, paid off hackers. Notably, he worked with Robert Mueller. Additionally, ownership of public key infrastructure crypto keys lies with someone central to it all. Entrust owns Thoma Bravo, connecting to Cankles through Rose Law Firm.

@DominiqueRebel - Sophia Spiritualite ☦️🔮🪬

THOMA BRAVO! ARE WE REALLY BACK TO THESE PEOPLE! Jesus christ cant there be more ppl involved in this nonsense besides the same ones over and over!

@DominiqueRebel - Sophia Spiritualite ☦️🔮🪬

Im goimg to walk you thru this ONE TIME! Thoma Bravo is ENTRUST and Entrust is owned by Joe Sullivan. CyberTrust and DigiCert were both aquired by Thoma Bravo. These are all the SAME PEOPLE https://t.co/82s2XmWtiD

@DominiqueRebel - Sophia Spiritualite ☦️🔮🪬

DigiCert, Thoma Bravo, and CyberTrust somehow verify ALL ELECTIONS IN ALL STATES https://t.co/mlEMTg5fUW

@DominiqueRebel - Sophia Spiritualite ☦️🔮🪬

Joe Sullivan was the chief technologybofficer at Uber when they had a HUGE DATA BREECH! It was criminal what was done but Sullivan arranged for the “hackers” (feature not bug) to be paid off https://t.co/EuElH1zVZL

@DominiqueRebel - Sophia Spiritualite ☦️🔮🪬

Joe Sullivan ALSO happens to be a former AUSA working with ...... ROBERT MUELLER https://t.co/US6aqHUXYq

@DominiqueRebel - Sophia Spiritualite ☦️🔮🪬

Finally, if you havent spilled all your guts yet guess who is right in the middle of it all with her OWNERSHIP OF THE PUBLIC KEY INFRASTRUCTURE CRYPTO KEYS 🤮🤮🤮 https://t.co/um09mgNf2p

@DominiqueRebel - Sophia Spiritualite ☦️🔮🪬

CORRECTION: One small correction. Entrust is owned (largest shareholder) by Jerry Jones (Rose Law Firm) and Thoma Bravo is owned/managed by Joseph Sullivan. For clarification, Entrust OWNS Thoma Bravo. Thats how Cankles ties in, through Rose Law Firm. https://t.co/bCtShcSlwO

KanekoaTheGreat
Posted - January 8, 2023 at 9:56 PM
Saved - June 4, 2023 at 9:05 AM

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

Hacking America's Election System 1 hour of computer scientists, election security experts, and Senate Democrats talking about how easy it is to hack voting machines. @KariLake @katiehobbs @GenFlynn @realMikeLindell @bgmasters @PatrickByrne @JackPosobiec @DavidSacks @elonmusk https://t.co/sH4Ft0iMsB

Video Transcript AI Summary
Voting machines in the US are vulnerable to hacking and manipulation, according to researchers. These machines, which come in various models, have been found to have security vulnerabilities that allow attackers to inject malicious software and change election data. The machines can be hacked through the machine used to program them, and many of them have wireless modems that can connect to the internet, despite claims that they are not connected. The vulnerabilities in the voting machines, along with the lack of secure systems for voter registration and result reporting, pose a significant risk to the integrity of elections. It is crucial to address these vulnerabilities to ensure the trustworthiness of election results.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I know America's voting machines are vulnerable because my colleagues and I have hacked them repeatedly. We've created attacks that can spread from machine to machine like a computer virus, and silently change election outcomes, and in every single case We've found ways for attackers to sabotage machines and to steal votes. Across the country, there are about 52 different models of machines. They they fall into essentially 2 styles. Ones that scan a piece of paper or ones where the vote, the voter just interacts with the touch screen. And many of them have been analyzed now by researchers, looking for security vulnerabilities. In every single case where a US voting machine has been analyzed by competent security researchers, They have found vulnerabilities that would let someone inject malicious software and change election data. Every single case. Speaker 1: The better or the more efficient way of hacking machines would be to subvert them all through the machine that's used to actually program those machines. So prior to each election, the county election office or the voting machine vendor will actually program memory cards for that election. It tells the machine who are the candidates, what are the, you know, the the contests being decided, and that gets It's inserted into the voting machine. If you can alter, if you can subvert that machine that is used to program those memory cards, then you can pass rogue software to the voting machine. Speaker 0: Voting machines that are not connected to the internet. This is something that you hear all the time in the US from election officials. Unfortunately, it's not actually true. Many new voting machines that come with 4 gs wireless modems so that they can be connected to the internet from the polling place in order to upload the results faster. Now to me, that sounds crazy. Why would you want to put your voting machines on the Internet right in the middle of the election, potentially at the most vulnerable Speaker 2: time. Studies conducted in 2007 by the state of California, state of Ohio, state of Florida found security vulnerabilities that could take advantage of these To engineer viruses where 1 compromised voting machine could then infect eventually the entire fleet of machines for an entire county. Typically at the end of the election day, you move a memory card through each of the machines in the precinct, and that's to collect the vote totals. That process can spread a virus. And there are other processes. The details vary from machine to machine. Speaker 3: When you say hacked, what were they able to do once they gained access to the machines? Speaker 4: All sorts of Executally manipulate the outcome of the vote. They could manipulate the tally. They could delete the tally, and and they could compromise the vote in any number of ways. Speaker 5: The machines used in Georgia have been demonstrated to be hackable through a virus that's carried on ballot definition cartridges. Very much like this Duxnet virus was inserted into nuclear centrifuges in Iran. Speaker 3: There are a number of states that outsource their reporting of elections to third parties, some of which are corporations based in other countries like Spain. So you've got to trust that the aggregation of the votes and the reporting of the votes is accurate as well. Speaker 0: I'm pretty sure my undergrad computer security class at Michigan could have changed the outcome of the 2016 teen Michigan election if we wanted to. It is that bad. And we have a combination of very powerful adversaries, and unfortunately quite vulnerable and obsolete systems. That's that's why I say it's only a matter of time. Speaker 6: Unfortunately, in a lot of these systems, The audit trails are just as vulnerable as the other aspects of the system. So there may not be good forensic evidence of a successful intrusion. With the current design, we cannot be universally confident that it hasn't happened. And it's probably only a matter of time before it will. Speaker 7: I come here today as a computer scientist who spent the better part of the last quarter century studying Election system security. As you're well aware, the integrity of elections across the US depends heavily on the integrity of computers and Software systems. Unfortunately, much of this infrastructure has proven dangerously vulnerable to tampering and attack, and in some cases, In ways that cannot be easily detected or corrected, after the fact. These vulnerabilities can create practical avenues for, corrupt candidates or foreign adversaries to do everything from cause large scale disruption on Election Day to potentially, undetectably alter, election outcomes in some cases. So let me begin with the voting equipment itself. To be blunt, it's a widely recognized, really indisputable fact that every piece of computerized voting equipment in use at polling places today Can be easily compromised, in ways that have the potential to disrupt election, operations, compromise firmware and software, Potentially alter, vote tallies in the absence of, other safeguards. This is partly a consequence of historically poor design and implementation by equipment vendors, but it's ultimately a reflection of the nature of complex software. It's simply beyond the state of the art, to build software systems that can reliably withstand targeted attack By a determined adversary in this kind of an environment. The vulnerabilities are real. They're serious. And absent a surprising and very fundamental break through in my field, which I would welcome, but I don't see coming, soon, probably inevitable. We give most of the attention to vulnerabilities in voting machines, But that's not the whole story. Each of the more than 5,000 jurisdictions responsible for running elections across the nation Must maintain a number of critical information systems that are attractive targets for disruption by adversaries. Most important of these are voter registration databases, the systems that report, final results, and so forth. Unfortunately, There are even fewer standards for how to secure these systems. The administration of these systems varies widely. And the threats against these systems are often even more, acute than the threats against individual voting systems. You know, just as we don't expect the local sheriff to single handedly defend against military ground invasions, we shouldn't expect county election IT managers to defend against cyber attacks by foreign intelligence services, but that's precisely what we've been asking them, to do. Speaker 0: I'm a professor of computer science and have spent the last 10 years studying the electronic voting systems that our nation relies on. My conclusion from that work is that our highly computerized election infrastructure that is vulnerable to sabotage, and even to cyber attacks that could change votes. These realities risk making our election results more difficult for the American people to trust. I know America's voting machines are vulnerable because my colleagues and I have hacked them repeatedly, as part of a decade of research, studying the technology that operates elections and learning how to make it stronger. We've created attacks that can spread from machine to machine, like a computer virus, and silently change election outcomes. We've studied touch screen and optical scan systems, and in every single case we've found ways for attackers to sabotage machines and to steal votes. These capabilities are certainly within reach for America's enemies. As you know, states choose their own voting technology. And while some states are doing well with security, others are alarmingly vulnerable. This puts the entire nation at risk. In close elections, an attacker can probe the most important swing states or swing counties, find areas with the weakest protection, and strike there. In a close election year changing a few votes in key, localities could be enough to tip national results. The key lesson from 2016 is that these threats are real. Some say the fact that voting machines aren't directly connected to the Internet makes them secure, but unfortunately this is not true. Voting machines are not as distant from the Internet as they may seem. So the way these attacks work Is that before every election, every voting machine needs to be programmed with the design of the ballot, the names of the races and candidates. And voting officials do that by inserting a memory card into the machine. If an attacker can infect that memory card With malicious code, well, when the memory card is inserted into the machine, it can change the programming running on the voting machine And caused the voting machine to, at the end of the election, output whatever results the attacker wants. Speaker 5: The machine that I hacked is called the Sequoia AVC Advantage, now called the Dominion AVC Advantage. It's in The computer program that counts the votes on this machine is in a read only memory that's mounted in a socket on the motherboard. To hack this machine, you have to Remove that memory chip from its socket and install a memory chip, on which you've prepared a cheating program. The cheating program that I prepared, has an extra 100 lines of code basically that, when the polls are about to close, it goes in there and changes some votes stored in the machine. And there is an electronic log of all votes cast, so it changes the log too. So to install that, the attacker doesn't need to be a computer scientist, the attacker just needs to have A bunch of copies of this memory chip, with the fraudulent program on it. And for each voting machine, unscrew 10 screws to remove the panel that that covers the motherboard, pry out the ROM chip containing the legitimate program and install the ROM chip containing the fraudulent program. Other kinds of voting machines store their computer program that counts to votes in flash memory. And this can be updated Under the control of whatever computer program happens to be running in the voting machine. These voting machines, typically the generation developed in the 1990s and after, can be hacked without actually physically changing any hardware in the machine, just by installing a software upgrade Memory card in the same slot that one would normally install the ballot definition. And this particular attack was demonstrated by my colleague at Princeton, Professor Felton, In about 2007, working with 2 of his graduate students. But it's not just us at Princeton, there are many kinds of voting machines and The same kinds of hacks are applicable to all voting machines and have been demonstrated at several other universities, including University of Connecticut, Johns Hopkins, Michigan and others. There are cyber security issues in all parts of our election system. Before the election, voter registration databases. During the election, voting machines. After the election, vote tabulation, canvassing, precinct aggregation computers. Installing new software in a voting machine is not really much different from installing new software in any other kind of computer. Installing new software is how you hack a voting machine to cheat. In 2009, in the courtroom of the Superior Court of New Jersey, I demonstrated how to hack a voting machine. I wrote a vote stealing computer program that shifts votes from 1 candidate to another. Installing that vote stealing program in a voting machine takes 7 minutes per machine with a screwdriver. But really the software I built was not rocket science. Any computer programmer could write the same code. Once it's installed, it could steal elections without detection for years to come. Voting machines are often delivered to polling places several days before the election, to elementary schools, churches, firehouses. In these locations, anyone could gain access to a voting machine for 10 minutes. Between elections, the machines are routinely opened up for maintenance by county employees or private contractors. Let's assume they have the utmost integrity. But still in the US we try to run our elections so that we can trust the election results without relying on any one individual. Other computer scientists have demonstrated similar hacks on many models of machine. This is not just 1 glitch in 1 manufacturer's machine. It's the very nature of computers. So how can we trust our elections when it's so easy to make the computers cheat? Speaker 8: Mr. Appel, in that scenario, an attacker would actually have to have access to all 100 in the 1 county in order to manipulate the records. Speaker 5: In Georgia, that's not the case. The machines used in Georgia Have been demonstrated to be hackable through a virus that's carried on ballot definition cartridges, very much like this Stuxnet virus was, inserted into nuclear centrifuges in Iran. So, and in Speaker 8: that auditing system, in the auditing of these machines. We look at that. Is that correct? Speaker 5: I'm sorry. Can you repeat the question? Speaker 8: So, in those machines that have that vulnerability in the auditing process. Isn't that scanned? Don't we scan for that? Speaker 5: It's difficult to scan for that vulnerability in the sense of if you Ask a machine to report what software is loaded in it. If it's fraudulent software, it will lie. So, the AccuVote TS machines, used in Georgia and in a few counties in other states are particularly vulnerable to this kind of virus that can be carried to the machines even if the criminal attacker doesn't touch the machines or is not even in the same state with the machines. Cap. Speaker 9: With parts made all over the world, and software made all over the world, and as Sherry said, there's only 3 or 4 manufacturers, the the one core point That kind of election security experts and others have been making about why our votes are safe was that the decentralized nature of our, Voting systems, the thousands and thousands of of, voting offices around the country that administer the election is what kept safe because Russians would need to have tens of thousands of operatives go get physical access to machines to actually, infiltrate the election. We now know that's false. And that through a handful of simple attacks, into manufacturers not in the United States, The Russians could plant malware into, thousands of machines all at once and hack the entire U. S. Election without ever leaving the Kremlin. Speaker 10: Or is there a different way where you could just hack one machine and that would transmit a bug to other machines in the precinct, again, even though they're not connected to an internet. Speaker 2: Sure. So before we had an Internet, we had computers with floppy drives. And there were computer viruses that could spread from 1 computer to another over floppies. Electronic voting machines, some of them use memory cards, some of them have these big battery packs, some of them have local area networks. Studies conducted in 2007 by the state of California, state of Ohio, state of Florida found security vulnerabilities that could take advantage of these to engineer viruses where 1 compromised voting machine could then infect eventually the entire fleet of machines for an entire county. And Each of these studies found ways that regular poll workers and election officials going through their standard procedures and and standard operations Could unwittingly be used to transmit viruses from 1 machine to another through the motion. Typically at the end of the election day, you move a memory card through each of the machines in the precinct, and that's to collect the vote totals. That process can spread a virus. And there are other processes. The details vary from machine to machine. Speaker 10: Okay. So it's accurate to say that just because something is not connected to the internet, it does not have a vulnerability to cyber attack. Speaker 2: Being disconnected from the Internet helps, but it's not a panacea, okay? Speaker 11: When you and your colleagues hacked election systems, did you get caught? Speaker 0: We hacked, election systems as part of academic research where we had machines in our system. Did you get caught? Speaker 11: Did they did they see your intrusion into their systems? Speaker 0: The one instance when I was invited to hack a real voting system to while people were watching, was in Washington, D. C. In 2010, and in that instance it took less than 48 hours for us to change all the votes, and we were not caught. Speaker 11: Vice, Chairman. Speaker 0: I have sitting in my office right now actually, a deep old AccuVote TSX machine, a touchscreen machine that's still in use in 23 states, where, I've hacked it to give whatever outcome I want. It it really is that easy. And when you're talking about, when you're talking about these attacks, though, I don't think it's something that, You know, just in every case, a, a freshman in college could do it. Some states are a little bit better protected, but that's not who we're up against. We're up against nation state attackers that are among some of the most Powerful, adversaries in the world when it comes to cyber attacks, and which have routinely compromised highly protected sites like, like military installations, and large tech companies. I think that's the thing that I want voting officials and and voters to understand is quite what they're up against. And we have a combination of very powerful adversaries and series, and unfortunately quite vulnerable and obsolete systems. That's why I say it's only a matter of time. Speaker 3: The standard arguments that, our elections can't be hacked in the US are some combination of physical security. You can't get access to the devices, they're not connected to the internet, they're tested before Election Day, and the system is too decentralized. It's run by, you know, a bunch of individual election officials and individual counties and and jurisdictions. So it's it's a it's a hard target. Most of this has already been debunked by, the previous speakers, but, physical security is pretty lax. Equipment, has sleepovers in school gymnasiums, and churches, and this and that. There are lots of, examples on the Internet of photos of, election, equipment warehouses, where the the Election officials warehouses with the door propped open and nobody watching. Just, it's just not true. It isn't true that the machines aren't connected to the Internet, and even if they weren't to the Internet that would still be hackable through other means. One of the things that hasn't been mentioned so far yet is supply chain hacks. There are components in these voting systems that come from foreign countries. A colleague of ours, Karsten Sherman, at the IT University of Copenhagen, Found Chinese pop songs in memory of a voting machine that he bought, on the Internet. So that those songs somehow made it through the quality control of The election equipment vendor, and then through, how many elections that it was actually used in by the local election official, and, and, you know, we're still there. Moreover, there's an issue in reporting, which I'm not going to talk about that much, but there are a number of states that outsource their reporting of elections to third parties, some of which are corporations based in other countries like Spain. So you've got to trust that the aggregation of the votes and the reporting of the votes is is, is accurate as well. There's a lot of technology being rolled out in this election, that had either not been used or not been used as widely before. This includes, much more widespread reliance on things like electronic poll books, which become a point of vulnerability that can disenfranchise people if they malfunction, if they lose their Internet connection, or if they've been hacked, some jurisdictions are relying on uploading election results using cellular modems or, the internet That, of course, introduces another point of vulnerability, not just to the data that's flowing, but also to the software, the devices that, that are being connected. Voting equipment itself, there are states that have rolled out touchscreen voting for all in person voters. This is, An unnecessary introduction of brittle and vulnerable technology. Many pieces of electronic technology that are involved in elections are Either incorporate, devices that were built overseas, or assembled overseas, and many crucial functions are being outsourced to foreign companies. One, noteworthy example that I'm especially concerned about, there is a Spanish firm, called CITL, which runs, they they provide election reporting for something like 11 US states. They're based in Spain, and they're bankrupt. So that could, obviously, is a point of failure where, someone could shed a lot of mistrust over the election results By simply falsifying what gets posted, even if the correct results could ultimately be recovered from durable reliable records, that would certainly, cast a lot of fear uncertainty and doubt on what's going on. There have been ransomware attacks on, government systems now including some voting systems, We know that there are cyber warfare attacks by Russia, China, Iran and North Korea. There most states voter registration databases were, penetrated in 2016, there is a lot of evidence that data were changed, but that could certainly happen this time around. So all in all, there's a lot of confusion, there are a lot of points of vulnerability. There are a lot of known problems. There are some election vendors who have been hacked, before 2016. VR systems was hacked in Florida. Some of their clients were, there were phishing attacks against them this time, around, let's see, I forgot my name of it. Tyler Technologies, which provides some, vote by mail ballot, tracking and some vote aggregation reporting has also been hacked. So overall, there's an awful lot that can go wrong. Speaker 12: He saw no evidence of, Tampering with, no, voter voting machines or voter tallies. That's not true. It didn't happen. We just didn't see the evidence of it. Speaker 13: Well, there has been never a documented incident when votes have been changed during the real election. And my answer was please continue using these machines and that will remain to be true forever, Because these machines don't have a capability of providing you forensic evidence to see if they cannot prove they were honest, they cannot prove that they were have been hacked. They simply don't have the fundamental basic capabilities of providing you that forensic evidence, that data. Only way you can see that that machine was hacked if the attacker wanted to be found that it was hacked. That's a sad truth. So Anyone who says I have a information one way or another, that's an opinion. That's not fact based. Fact is, it can be done without leaving trace. Speaker 14: When you know how the system for looking for the evidence, you know that you won't find it because the systems are not recording, Generating, preserving or protecting meaningful forensic evidence. And this is from the very beginning to the end of the process everywhere. These systems really don't have a capability of recording and protecting any meaningful audit information or forensically important information. So a lot of times I would also argue that even if you try to take a look into the into the evidence, the problem is that there is no Evidence which is trustworthy and and worth on a lot. Even recently, a case where a voting machine was reporting, and I believe that was in the last year in North voting machine was in the race where they had 50,000 votes cast, was cast reporting to 1 candidate 164 or something like that votes. And when the paper was looped, that person actually get 26,000 vote and vote by 1 by 1,000 votes. Speaker 12: Wow. Speaker 14: So we we really need to have that paper ballot. There's nothing we don't have a technology to do electronic voltage. The problem the most most Driving thing is, first of all, from 2006 to now is nothing changed. The actual same version of software I hacked 2005 is still in use. It's those machines are still in 20 states. Mhmm. So they're still around. Even the so called new sold today is In the end of life version of of Windows, etcetera, like, just something which no other industry would be acceptable, would be remotely acceptable. So I think the most as overall, it is how outdated everything is And and how hard it is to make people to understand the the reality and and get the warning through that this needs to be fixed or things will get really, really worse, turn the worse. They're bad right now, but and I cannot even Cannot imagine what the worst would be looking like. Parties, they are not actually but a lot of these voting machines are not US origin. And I'm not only talking about the components being made in China or a voting machine being assembled in in Philippines, but also the very of the machine, the programming. In many many many voting machines, that programming, either whole or in the large part is Coming from a foreign from code sources. And it seems to be the case that actually the voting machine vendors, Generally speaking, either don't know or they refuse to tell the truth where the code actually comes. And it turned out that the system he is using exactly the same system which created this magnitude 16,022 votes in Volusia County for Al Gore. So I took a look into the system, figured out a couple of ways to manipulate the central tabulator. But I told I on this well, this is not elegant. You leave a audit trail. You leave a evidence, the bet bet, breadcrumbles. You can trace it. I was asked, well, if there what is the elegant way? So I have I don't know if there's 1. But if if there is, it's gotta be this memory card. Speaker 15: So it's so it's a memory card that fits into the voting machine that you found could be the more or less untraceable or hard to trace way to manipulate the results, whereas they were thinking it was something in the machine. You thought this was attack because you would see a ton of evidence and, like you said, breadcrumbs being left by the tampering party. Speaker 14: Well, it's it's no. It's if not even that. I was just Thinking about the architecture of the system. And with that architecture, it made sense that there's executable program in the memory card. And I was quickly told that that's impossible because it's against the certified rules. But, also, the vendor was dishonest about the origin of the card. So, well, if they are not Honest about one thing they're probably not honest about. The second thing, I found an executable program on a memory card. I found it's it's completely unprotected. This This memory card is so old. It's older than floppy drive. So it actually, I found it because I was I remember that I have seen it before floppy drives existed. So that's what I found who was the original manufacturer of it. And a, interesting The thing about this explanation afterwards was that demand 16,000 was malfunction Of the memory card, that's the, that's the reason why it happened. Not possible. That reason why it's not possible is that that memory card Doesn't know how to make negative numbers. So whatever caused that man respond 16,000 votes, which we don't know what caused it. At least the official explanation given at the time, not possible. Something else happened. Speaker 1: So everyone was focused in 2000 on the punch card machines and the problems that that brought. But in Fallucia County, there was an incident that occurred. It didn't A lot of attention. And the attention that it did get sort of disappeared and got lost in all of the focus on the punch card machines. What happened in Volusia County was around At 10 p. M. Midnight or sorry, 10 p. M. On election night. Prior to that, Al Gore in Volusia County was ahead of George Bush. But around 10 p. M, suddenly, Al Gore's number started reversing. And it reversed more than 16,000 votes. And in There aren't, it was all happening in 1 precinct, and of course, there weren't 16,000 voters in that 1 precinct. So Gore's numbers were actually showing a negative 16,000 in that precinct. And the explanation that election officials provided was that, a faulty memory card was inserted into the tabulating machine. Now, it wasn't, the, let's say, legitimate memory card. So there was 1 memory card for this precinct, and it was uploaded to a tabulator on election night. But the logs show that an hour after that memory card was uploaded, another 2nd memory card for that same precinct was uploaded. And after that 2nd card was uploaded, that's when the votes for Gore started disappearing. And no one has been able to explain what exactly happened with that, whether that was a rogue card that was intentionally designed to hack the votes and misfired and therefore, Erased too many votes for Gore or whether this was, you know, a software mishap. But no one has explained why 2 memory cards for the same precinct were uploaded. And that's that's sort of the main problem in terms of chains of custody, the fact that a second memory card was actually ever able to be uploaded. Speaker 6: And John Kerry has expressed misgivings about the 2004 vote in Ohio. Speaker 1: Yes. So they had concerns about the machines in Ohio. Ohio was still largely using punch card machines. They hadn't replaced theirs yet. But there were still counties there were counties that were already using optical scan machines and also paperless DRE machines. And he and his group, he revealed this only recently, actually went to court court to try and obtain the algorithms, the software, to look at the software to make sure that it would be counting votes accurately. And the courts denied access to it because the proprietary software on voting machines is considered a trade secret. And so the private voting machine companies go to court to fight against this, and the courts generally agree with them. Speaker 14: When I and others, when we 2005, 2006 got involved And up until 2008, we all thought now when the problem has been exposed, it will be fixed very quickly. It would it was completely Always incomprehensible for me and and other secretary researchers that now 2020, we are talking about this topic. And, also, we are 2020 using the same machines with the same software. It's just you wouldn't be using a a 30 year old PC with with no security patches, But that's exactly how the elections are conducted. Let's talk about everything in the world how this works. Speaker 16: Okay. Speaker 17: So Speaker 14: you have a voting message, a voting terminal. That's how you pass your ballot, either electronically or paper ballot, it's go scanning. And after that, these machines are reporting those results Very often, our our communication lies through the central tabulator. Now in both in the county level, or or state level, where the votes are accumulated in database, and along the path, there are number of data storage, systems databases. And if you manipulate those, you can create an illusion of a different results. And you can even do it in the about election reporting system. So instead of even hacking anything in the tabulator system, you are just creating wrong reporting. So there are a number of ways how you can, through this whole path, influence the results. And we have to actually step even further back, Steph, because if we look the election as whole, it's a myriad of system. We have voter registration system. Them. We have electronic poll book systems. We have the election management. We have the ballot casting. We have the tabulation, and we have the reporting. Any of these, if you have one of these, you can always have the result. You can disenfranchise voters so they can cast their ballot. You can change the the outcome. You can change the reporting. Each of these needs to be secured. None of these is less important than the others. And that's why we have been I think in the public mind, we have been focusing in a very narrow area, Which is you cast a ballot on how the ballot is counted, but not missing the whole big picture. How many other systems from a adversary, how from from ethical's point of view, where the other can go and achieve the same goal. How about the Internet? It really it's everything is connected to Internet either directly or indirectly. And the more modern voting machines, they actually have a mobile phone Modem, in to speak, they have a they have a mobile phone mobile phone connectivity to county headquarters. They are sending the results. So wireless is coming back to the voting message in the newer generations. Nice marketing material trying to tell it's not, but it is. A journalist in a year ago, she found 200 voting machines in the Internet. Voting machine vendors say, well, they are not in Internet because they are not pingable. My answer to that is, are you from the past? Because since since 15 years ago, nothing is really anymore pingable, And they are still connected to Internet. It's the the whole argument is 15 that argument was to have been meaning something 15 years ago. It doesn't mean anything today. And, again, I I was just came from Atlanta, and and they have new working machines because the judge ordered the old ones to be scrapped. And part of the things in the the judge's ruling was that, The finding was that the voting machine were programmed by basically 3 guys from their homes and who sent all the programming of the voting machine for next hours and over Internet to We distribute all the machines. Speaker 15: Oh, so these guys had programmed the machines from home, and then they they pushed the code update to the voting machines via the Internet. Speaker 14: We what they said but they pushed it to the state, and then the state pushed it to the counties. And, actually, this whole thing about, the critical election specific programming going over Internet is very common because lot of this programming is done by private companies, third party management companies. And it's, it has been shocking the last 2 years when I have been working for a number of secretaries of state And looking how the security has done in their state just to find that email, FTP with no security. These are the common methods to send the most mission critical programming from the private company, which might be out of state, to the local county who is putting it into the machines. It is whoever controls that data controls the election. Speaker 15: And these machines, they like you said, they have network cards. You show in Kill Chain, again, the documentary that we'll link in the show notes, that they have USB ports. They have memory card slots. They have modems and phone jacks sometimes. So these things were built for connectivity. They're not immune to connectivity. And we don't by the seem seemingly, we don't have to hack Hundreds of machines. These are networked. You can just make software that infects 1 and then dozens of others or just changes the data. Do you think we could, Is it possible so do you think it's possible that we could create a worm that it yet we get on 1 machine in the voting center and it just connects to the other machines covertly and infects them without the bad actors so much as laying a hand on the machine themselves. Speaker 14: The real, proof of concept virus was demonstrated over 10 years ago. So, that that already has been demonstrated publicly that voting machine virus which can, self propagate from 1 voting machine to another, that's a reality which We have sown it's possible. So beyond and that's one of the things why that was created was because, Again, when you say it's possible by showing the vulnerability, people said, well, I don't believe until you show it. So it's one of the rear Things where, a team of researchers developed in the actual virus just to show the logical outcome of the the the vulnerability. Yes. There can be a voting machine virus. Full stop. Here it is. Speaker 18: We've heard a lot from voting machine vendors and election officials that voting machines Can't be hacked because they're not connected to the Internet. All of those vulnerabilities that Andrew talked about, are not a problem because no one can access the machines. And it turns out that the message that they've been giving us for years, and particularly after the 2016 election, just isn't true. Voting machine vendors have sold election officials on these in use of modems. In some cases, the modems are embedded inside the voting machines. In other cases, there are external modems that get attached to the voting machine at the end of the election. So at the end of the election, the machine goes into shutdown mode And then this option pops up about modoming results. And so the system will automatically then dial in and send these votes, over a cellular modem to a server on the Internet that collects the results. So everyone will tell you, and they've told me every time I've spoken with them, that cellular modems are not really Internet connectivity. They will say that doesn't mean that the machine is connected to the Internet. It's using a cellular modem. Well, that's not true. And Election Systems and Software, which is tax. This is one of their statements over and over again with the public. But this is one of their own diagrams that they actually gave to Rhode Island in 2015. And if you see that circular part in the centre there showing that modem transmission using a wireless modem, They sit there, right there. It's on their own diagram that it's going over the internet. So what happens is that the transmission of the votes votes, that the voting machine will dial in using the cellular modem and it contacts the nearest cell tower. And then the data goes through that cell tower into the carrier's back end network. But then the data actually has to get to that county network, and it goes over the Internet to a system, a server that's on the Internet to receive those votes. So we've already now basically shown the misinformation of the transmission of those votes. So ES and S will then say, well, it doesn't matter because all of that process is secured. So the transmission of the votes are secured so that no one can intercept them and read the votes or alter them. The modem is configured in such a way so that no one can actually dial into the modem, it can only dial out, and it can only dial out when the machine shuts down at the end of the election. So apparently, there are all of these safeguards. And also, the back end system that receives the transmitted votes is supposed to communicate only with one of those authenticated machines with the modem. The problem is none of this has been tested or certified. The voting machines themselves go through sort of a federal testing lab process And through certification, the modem transmissions don't. So we don't know what's inside those modems. We don't know how they work. We don't know how they're configured. And ES and S doesn't have a good track record on implementing security. So we don't actually know that the way that they are saying that these are transmitted securely is actually case. So what can happen with a modem machine that's transmitting? So I don't know if you're familiar with something called a stingray. It's a device that law enforcement uses and the military uses. And what it does is it, masquerades as a legitimate cell tower. It transmits a much more powerful signal than the nearby cell tower so that your cell phone will connect to the stingray instead of the cell tower. And then it might pass it on to the cell tower as well. It's mostly used for tracking phones, but there are also Stingrays that are designed also to intercept the content of communication. So if you've got a cellular modem in a voting machine, a rogue person can put a rogue cell tower near some kind of voting precinct, whatever. And instead of that modem then connecting to that cell tower, they can connect to that rogue The rogue cell tower. You can intercept data. If it's not properly encrypted, you could intercept the data and change the results. Or you could basically swap out the a whole package of results if it's not authentically signed, and replace it with your own package of results. And so those go on to the server. If there's a vulnerability in that modem, A hacker can actually transmit malware back onto that voting machine through the rogue cell tower. And once you're in that voting machine, Either that way or maybe you've gotten into the voting machine prior when it's being programmed, you now actually control the configuration of that modem. So even if ES and S says that modem will only work at the end of the election and will only call out and not receive calls in. If you control the configuration of that modem, you change all of that. You can have that machine contact your system at any time you want, for however you want, so that you can do reconnaissance on that machine and study it and established your attack. There were a group of researchers that decided that they would try and see if they could find those backend servers that receive the votes that are transmitted by modem. So if you've got something that's transmitting the votes over the cellular network, there's something that has to be connected to the internet to receive them. So there is a server. And it turns out that they could actually, based on configuration information that's publicly available on the internet, that the voting machine vendors provide to election offices and the election offices post on the internet. They describe the type of that we have created a firewall that they use. It's made by Cisco. They describe the type of FTP software that receives the votes, that sits on that server. They describe the whole configuration, including the type of cellular modem that's embedded in their machines. So based on that information, they decided to see if they could look for that very specific footprint of ESNS machines that are receiving the votes. And they did a scan and they were able to find these systems on the Internet. So they found 9 Wisconsin counties that had systems connected to the Internet, 7 Florida counties, from 4 Michigan counties. They actually found systems in 10 different states, but these were the primary ones. And of course, these are all important critical swing states. So here's the thing. Election officials will tell you, well, the modem transmissions don't matter because we only turn on those modems for a very brief period, less than a minute at the end of the election to transmit. And that's not sufficient time for someone to hack. Any of the technical attack. But more importantly, it turns out these systems aren't just connected for a few minutes after an election. Those back end systems that receive the votes are quite often connected year round. You can see them when they're doing the scans. You can sometimes see them. They come up a couple of weeks. Some of the ones that are only up temporarily will sometimes come up a couple of weeks before the election because they want to test the transmission. And then they leave it on for those weeks before the election. And after the election, they might forget to take it down and it might stay up a couple of other weeks. But there are some that simply never take them down at all. And Wisconsin was one of them. They were on year round. These systems, so what are they? I describe this as a server, but that sounds kind of benign. What is happening is that the The votes are being transmitted, and on the receiving end there's a firewall that's connected to the internet. And behind the firewall, There is this FTP server that the votes are transmitted on. Now that FTP server is supposed to serve as kind of like a DMZ, a safe zone, right? So the votes are deposited and there's supposed to be then no direct connection to the system that actually tabulates the votes. But it turns out that's not the case at all. This is a diagram that ES and S created and handed out to election officials. And so you can see that the votes are coming over the Internet, and they're coming and there's the firewall, and then you see all those wires connected. And you see at the bottom there that EMS, that's the Election Management system. That is the system that tabulates the final results. So even though they say that, that transmission of votes over the Internet is just unofficial, Connected to that system that's receiving those unofficial votes is also the system that is tabulating the official results. What's more, that election management system is also used to program all the voting machines prior to an election. So when, I brought this To ES and S's attention, they didn't then say that nothing is connected to the Internet. What they said was none of those critical systems are pingable from the Internet because there's a firewall in front. So essentially what they're saying is that even though now first they've said that none of these systems are connected to the Internet. And now when they're faced with someone saying, well, they actually are connected, they say, well, they may be configured in some manner that you're showing, but there's a firewall in front of them and therefore, you can't see what's behind the firewall. But if you can find the firewall, then you find the systems that are behind the firewall. The only thing that's protecting anyone from getting into those critical systems behind the firewall are the rules of that firewall that say, only these certain systems can connect to us, only these certain systems can transmit data. That's simply software. It's configuration rules. And if you misconfigure that software, then anything can get into that firewall. And of course, many, many hacks happen because firewalls are misconfigured. Speaker 0: I was part of the team that did the first hands on study of any electronic voting machine used in the US and it was using exactly this machine. And what we found, well, we got one of these machines from a whistleblower, Brought it into a laboratory. Reverse engineered it. And well, here's the result of what we found. We we would run a mock election with George Washington and Benedict Arnold, just like this. And, wanted to know, well, if an attacker that could get malicious software into the machine somehow. Could they change the results? And what we found after reverse engineering the machine was, well, Yeah. There are actually a lot of problems with it. All the records of the vote are contained in, in computer memory. And, an attacker can manipulate the software that's supposed to be running in the machine in a pretty straightforward way. Before every election, officials program the machine with the names of the candidates on the ballot by, installing some that they can change the software running in the machine. There are, unauthenticated software update mechanisms, there are offer overflows and the code that reads the data files from this. There's even an interpreted programming language and the rules for how the votes will be counted are contained in an unauthenticated program contained on the memory card. So through any of those means, An attacker can change the software running on the voting machine and cause the machine to produce whatever election results they want. So that was in about 2007. We, we published the first paper about this. In and that's what we're going to do. And so we're going to have to do that. And so we're going to have to do that. And so we're flows and so forth. There have been hundreds and hundreds of pages of technical reports about US voting machines like this. But even after that, They haven't even updated the software since before the studies I talked about. That's how bad it is. And it's not even just a single model of machine that's the only problem. Country. There are about 52 different models of machines. They fall into essentially 2 styles, ones that scan a piece of paper or ones where the vote, the voter just interacts with the touch screen and many of them have been analyzed now by researchers, Looking for security vulnerabilities. In every single case where a US voting machine has been analyzed by by competent in security researchers. They have found vulnerabilities that would let someone inject malicious software and change election data, every single case. Before every election, election officials have to program the voting machines with who's on the ballot and what are the rules for counting. Well, they make that election programming on a PC workstation somewhere, either at the, at the jurisdiction or at an outside vendor that does it for them. If an attacker can break into that workstation which is called an election management system. They can spread malicious code to all of the memory cards used to program all of the voting machines in the jurisdiction. And those election management system workstations sometimes are connected to the internet, or they're, or the data that's programmed into them passes through an internet connected system. So we're just 1 or 2 hops away from an online attacker. Now how well secured are these systems? Well, here's, a vendor that did the election programming for, in a large fraction of my state in 2016. And we can just take a look at their website to see how secure this is likely to be. You can see, first of all, they don't have any HTTPS. Here are lots of nice, high resolution photographs of their warehouse, in case you want to break in. And perhaps most interestingly, here's their employee directory with everyone's name, job title, email address and photograph. So if I wanted to break into this company, let's say I was the attacker, I'd probably start by forging an email from, let's say, Larry, the president here, to Sue, his administrative assistant, asking her to urgently open an attachment. Now, of course, when she does, that attachment has my malware in it. I have a foothold into their network, and I can try to spread from there to the election management system and to the voting machines in most of the state. Tampering with the national election result in my country it's easier than well, easier than even I thought in 2016. I keep learning things that convince me that the situation is scarier than, than even experts had thought. You identify the states that are most weakly protected and going to be close. Target the computers that are going to program voting machines there, spread malware to machines to change a fraction of the votes, and then rely on the fact that most states, even if they have a paper record, are not going to rigorously use it to check that the computers are right. But the fact is that in close national contests in the US, the result really only hinges on the result in a small number of states. You've heard about the swing states in any given election. The ones that are, really competitive. In such a situation, an attacker can, before the election, identify which states are likely to be close. Try probing all of them in the way that the Russians did the voter registration systems in 2016 and just find the weakest swing states and attack there. So in this way, the American system converts, diversity of implementation into basically this patchwork of strength and weakness that gives attackers a menu of possible places to strike. It makes us weaker in close elections. So just to review, you look at the polls before the election and figure out which states were likely to be close. Probe all of them, find the ones with the weakest protection, then hack into the, election management systems there or at the outside vendors the states use. Once you hack into the election management system, you can spread malicious code to individual voting machines and have your code say, swap 10% of the votes in the places you infected. Then even if the votes are also recorded on a piece of paper, you don't have to worry. Because in most of those states, they're going to just toss the paper out without looking Speaker 5: Modems in voting machines are a bad idea. Those modems are network connections. And that leaves them vulnerable to hacking by anybody who can connect to that network. Speaker 19: ESNS insists While there are 14,000 of its modems in use, there are firewalls separating those modems from the public Internet. Speaker 5: Once a hacker Starts talking to the voting machine through the modem. They can hack the software in the voting machine and make it cheat in future elections. Speaker 17: What is the vehicle for the transmission from the ICP? Is it cellular modem versus VPN? It is a cellular modem that can be configured in a VPN. Right. And we currently in Chicago and Cook County, we work with Verizon to, secure that network. What wireless chipset Slash modem does the hardware have? We support a variety. So, it's really up to the jurisdictions, what technology they want to use, what's compatible with their networks. Speaker 16: Currently, in some jurisdictions, we're using, Basically a modem that is a three d modem, GSM, but we can support multiple varieties of modem that can be. Speaker 17: Including latest 4 gs standards Speaker 14: as well. Speaker 17: So the answers to the next question, is it Speaker 3: 3 gs or 4 gs? Verizon, 8 gs or 2 gs or Sprint, Speaker 5: I'm assuming Speaker 17: all? Yeah, all networks. Speaker 15: Just to Speaker 17: ask a quick question. Yes, I mean, we actually transmit from the ICP in Mongolia as well. So Speaker 7: We're not committed to networks. Speaker 16: And in Puerto Rico, there is 3 vendors because the island is not covered by any by any of the vendors completely. So we use 3 different cellular vendors for some ICPs with this vendor Claro, AT and T, MT Mobile, I think, in the different parts of the app. Speaker 14: More modern attack voting machines. They actually have a mobile phone modem, and to speak, they have a they have a mobile phone mobile phone connectivity to county headquarters. They are sending the results. Speaker 3: Some jurisdictions are relying on uploading election results using cellular modems or, the Internet. That of course introduces another point of vulnerability, not just to the data that's flowing, but also to the software, the devices that, that are being connected. Speaker 1: Many of these voting machines have modems embedded into them. And the modems are used at the end of the election to transmit the vote totals on election night to the county, The, elections office. So these modems contact their cellular modems, and they contact the cellular network, they contact the cell tower. So the cell tower traffic these In our modern times, it actually goes through Internet. It goes through the same kinds of routers and switches that the regular Internet traffic goes to. But also, in between that cell tower and that voting machine, An intruder can, intercept data going to the cell tower and intercept that that communication, that phone call. If you can trick a voting machine into, contacting your device, A fake cellular tower instead of a legitimate tower. You can actually use that connection to get back into the voting machine and get back into the tabulator, and then alter votes and software. Speaker 20: Virginia just stopped Using touch screen computer voting because it's so vulnerable. Speaker 18: We need to look at Speaker 20: all the voting machines. Every secretary of state needs to be, You know, assisted in making sure that they are not being, hacked and and attacked. Speaker 6: I continue to think that our voting machines are too vulnerable. Speaker 21: But researchers have repeatedly demonstrated That ballot recording machines and other voting systems are susceptible to tampering. Speaker 22: Even hackers with limited prior knowledge, tools, and resources are able to breach voting machines In a matter of minutes. Speaker 23: In 2018, electronic voting machines in Georgia and Texas deleted votes for certain candidates or switched votes from 1 candidate to another. Speaker 21: The biggest seller of voting machines is doing something that violates cyber security 101, directing that you install remote access software, which would make a machine like that, you know, a magnet for fraudsters and hackers. Speaker 24: These voting machines can be hacked quite easily. Speaker 25: You could easily Hack into them. It makes it seem like all these states are doing different things, but in fact 3 companies are controlling that. It is the individual voting machines That some pose that pose some of the greatest risks. Speaker 26: There are a lot of states that are dealing with antiquated machines, Right? Which are vulnerable to being hacked. Speaker 24: Workers were able to easily hack into an electronic voting machine. It was possible to switch votes. 43% Speaker 21: of American voters use voting machines that researchers have found have serious security flaws, Including backdoors. Speaker 3: We know how vulnerable now our systems were. We know I know the hackathon that took place last year, where virtually every machine was broken into fairly quickly. Speaker 26: I actually held a demonstration for my colleagues here at the capitol, where we brought in, folks Who, before our eyes, hacked election machines, those that are not those that are being used in many states. Speaker 22: Aging systems also frequently rely on unsupported software, like Windows XP in 2000, which may not receive regular security patches and are thus more vulnerable To the latest methods of cyber attack. Speaker 24: In a close presidential election, they just need to hack 1 swing state, or maybe 1 or 2, Or maybe just a few counties in one swing step. Speaker 27: I'm very concerned that you could have a hack that finally went through. You have 21 states that were hacked into. They didn't find out about it for a year. Right now, we have over a dozen dozen states That either don't have any backup paper ballots or only have them partially. Do you think that our adversaries don't know what those states are? Of course, they know what those states are. And if we have a close election in the general election, in a presidential race, and one state's out withstanding And their ballot boxes get hacked into, their elections get hacked into, we will have absolutely no backup.

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

25/ In effect, the left was allowed to discuss the vulnerabilities of voting machines after the 2016 election, and the right was banned from social media platforms for discussing those very same vulnerabilities after the 2020 election.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Virginia has stopped using touchscreen computer voting due to vulnerability, highlighting the need to assess all voting machines for security. Researchers have shown that voting systems are easily tampered with, even by hackers with limited resources. Instances of electronic voting machines deleting or switching votes have been reported in Georgia and Texas. The biggest seller of voting machines has violated cybersecurity principles by installing remote access software, making them attractive to fraudsters. The control of voting machines lies with three companies, posing significant risks. Many states still use outdated and hackable machines, and unsupported software further increases vulnerability. The potential consequences include compromised election results and a loss of faith in the democratic system.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Virginia just stopped using touchscreen computer voting because it's so vulnerable. Right. We need to look at all the voting machines. Every secretary of state needs to be, you know, assisted in making sure that they are not being hacked and and attacked. Speaker 1: I continue to think that our voting machines are too vulnerable. Speaker 2: Researchers have repeatedly demonstrated that ballot recording machines and other voting systems are susceptible to tampering. Speaker 0: Even hackers with limited prior knowledge, tools and resources are able to breach voting machines in a matter of minutes. Speaker 3: In 2018, electronic voting machines in Georgia and Texas deleted votes for certain candidates or switch votes from 1 candidate to another. Speaker 4: The biggest seller of voting machines is doing something that violates cybersecurity 101, directing that you install Remote access software, which would make a machine like that, you know, a magnet for fraudsters and hackers. Speaker 5: These voting machines can be hacked quite easily. Speaker 2: You could easily Hack into them. It makes it seem like all these states are doing different things, but in fact 3 companies are controlling that. It is the individual voting machines That some pose, that pose some of the greatest risks. Speaker 6: There are a lot of states that are dealing with antiquated machines, right, which are vulnerable to being hacked. Speaker 5: The workers were able to easily hack into an electronic voting machine. Speaker 4: It was possible to switch votes. 43% of American voters use voting machines that researchers have found have serious security flaws, Including backdoors. Speaker 7: We know how vulnerable now our systems were. We know I know the hackathon that took place last year, Where virtually every machine was broken into fairly quickly. Speaker 6: I actually held a demonstration for my colleagues here at the capitol, where we brought in, folks Who, before our eyes, hacked election machines, those that are not those that are being used in many states. Speaker 8: Aging systems also frequently rely On unsupported software, like Windows XP in 2000, which may not receive regular security patches and are thus more vulnerable To the latest methods of cyber attack. Speaker 5: In a close presidential election, they just need to hack 1 swing state or maybe 1 or 2 Or maybe just a few counties in one swing state. Speaker 2: I'm very concerned that you could have a hack that finally went through. You have 21 states that were hacked into. They didn't find out about it for a year. Right now, we have over a dozen dozen states that either don't have any backup paper ballots Or only have them partially. You think that our adversaries don't know what those states are? Of course, they know what those states are. And if we have a close election in the general election, in a presidential race, and one state's out withstanding and their Ballot boxes get hacked into. Their elections get hacked into. We will have absolutely no backup. Stalin was unconcerned about the vote. After all, he explained, he said that who voted was completely unimportant. What was Extraordinarily important, in his words, was who would count the votes and how. It is time to put politics aside and come together to secure the future of our election. So whether you're a 4 star general, A 4th grade teacher or a computer engineer at Foursquare, this is an issue that unites us. Speaker 8: In at least 40 states, elections are carried out using machines that are at least a decade old. And like any technology, -They're susceptible to increasing failure with age. Some state officials have had to turn to eBay to find critical components like dot matrix printers, Decades old storage devices and analog modems, aging systems also frequently rely on unsupported software Like Windows XP in 2000, which may not receive regular security patches and are thus more vulnerable to the latest Methods of cyber attack. Speaker 3: In 2016, state election websites in Illinois and Arizona were hacked by intruders who installed malware and downloaded sensitive voter information. Speaker 6: It is worth fighting for integrity in our election system, which means that they are free from interference by a hostile Or an unfriendly nation. Let's put the resources into upgrading the state's election systems. Because what we know is this. There are a lot of states that are dealing with antiquated machines, right, which are vulnerable to being hacked. I sit on the senate intelligence committee and senate homeland security committee. And we receive all kinds of information about the vulnerabilities to our national Security. We are vulnerable in terms of foreign interference with our elections. It's my understanding that some of the election system Vendors have required states to sign agreements, that prevent or inhibit independent, security testing. There's a saying that I'm sure Many of you have heard, which is the you know the difference between being hacked and not being hacked? Is knowing you've been hacked. Speaker 0: And they are still looking for ways to steal information about Voter registration, for example. There are some text experts in Silicon Valley Valley with whom I have met who say that, You know, maybe what they'll do this next time is to really disrupt the actual election. Shut down the servers that you send results to. Interfere with the operation of voting machines because still too many of them are linked to the Internet. So there we are still very vulnerable. Speaker 9: I mean, I can tell you in Virginia, when I was governor, I had to replace all the machines. Because I remember when I first voted when I went to Richmond, moved down as governor, I remember I kept voting in the senate race, kept voting for the Democrat. Republican name kept coming up. Three times that happened. Speaker 1: What do Speaker 4: you mean kept Coming up. Speaker 9: So I you know, we had the touch screens. I was voting for Mark Warner, our senator, and Ed Gosphy's name was light up. Happened to me 3 times. Finally, the 4th time, Mark Damon, I quickly hit vote, and I got out of there. You know, all the cameras are looking at me like this guy doesn't know how to vote. I mean, what's going on? So then I had an investigation done, and listen to this. I brought in some technology experts. They were able to hack into our machines from off-site In about 5 or 6 minutes, and within 4 minutes, they were able to change a vote. IDD certified all the machines. Now in Virginia, we have paper ballots. Speaker 4: 43% of American voters use voting machines that researchers have found have Serious security flaws, including backdoors. These companies are accountable to no one. They won't answer basic questions about their cybersecurity practices, and the biggest companies Won't answer any questions at all. 5 states have no paper trail, And that means there is no way to prove the numbers the voting machines put out are legitimate. So much for cybersecurity 101. The vast majority of 10,000 election jurisdictions Nationwide, use election management systems that run on old software That is soon gonna be out of date and ripe for exploitation by hackers according To an exhaustive analysis by the Associated Press, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Michigan, Florida, Iowa, Indiana, Arizona, and North Carolina, among others, Are all at risk. Even the state of Georgia, which just passed legislation to buy new voting machines, is on track to buy equipment that suffers from this significant cybersecurity weakness. Let's say the election is decided by a small percentage And people in America don't think that the election was fair. The effect that would have On our 200 year experiment in self governance, our democratic system Would take a real hit. Our elections weren't secure last week And they sure as heck aren't secure this week. And anybody who says otherwise It's either selling the voting machines or simply has a malicious intent towards our elections. At one point in the intelligence committee, both sides seemed to agree that no votes were changed In the 2016 election, and I said, the experts I talk to say that Until you have a forensic analysis of a vote, until you go in there and scrub the whole system, You can't really say that. So they're giving these voting machines specifically the hack into how successful were they? Speaker 1: Well, the the ongoing record Was, they hacked within 90 minutes of, being, being in the same space as the voting machines. Now these are not hackers that are actually touching the machines. They're doing this from across the room, on, on Internet like connections. But what it demonstrated, Pedro, is that the machines that we count on to make the basic connection between the American voter And the election results are vulnerable if they're in any way connected to the Internet. Speaker 4: And so when you say hacked, what were they able to do once they gained Access to the machines. Speaker 1: All sorts of things. They could manipulate, the outcome of the vote, they could manipulate the tally, they could delete the tally, and and they could compromise the vote in any number of ways. Just it was limited only by the hackers' creativity. Just how vulnerable Speaker 10: the machines were. I mean, what we found is that These machines were purchased by, local voting authorities, state and local voting authorities maybe 10 years ago. In many cases, the software and the hardware have not been updated, so they're as vulnerable as an old laptop That we might have, in in your home that you no longer use because it's just so out of date. Then what we found is that the supply chain for these these machines is largely un plotted. I mean, We found parts from China. We found, digital electronic parts from all over the world. By way of hacking, there's the potential that the actual vote tally could be compromised. So votes could be changed from this to that. Or votes could be suppressed, votes could be deleted, votes could be added, so you could actually change the tally itself.
Curiousityfirst
Posted - January 8, 2023 at 10:17 PM
Saved - June 4, 2023 at 9:05 AM

@Curiousityfirst - DogAndBone @Curious Cat

@jhalderm the same guy that found the Dominion vulnerability, wherein instead of stating they breached their contract, he ensured that DOMINION's CVR's were "sanitised" to make it difficult to analyse. @JanuszP20 @noodles @CannConActual @TxSaving https://t.co/AL4uliCgdh

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

🚨Hacking America's Election System 1 hour of computer scientists, election security experts, and Senate Democrats talking about how easy it is to hack voting machines. @KariLake @katiehobbs @GenFlynn @realMikeLindell @bgmasters @PatrickByrne @JackPosobiec @DavidSacks @elonmusk https://t.co/sH4Ft0iMsB

Video Transcript AI Summary
Voting machines in the US are vulnerable to hacking and manipulation, according to security researchers. These machines, which come in various models, have been found to have security vulnerabilities that allow attackers to inject malicious software and change election data. The most efficient way to hack the machines is through the machine used to program them, as it can pass rogue software to the voting machines. Contrary to popular belief, many voting machines are connected to the internet, either through wireless modems or other means, making them susceptible to cyber attacks. The lack of proper security measures and outdated systems make it only a matter of time before election results are compromised.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I know America's voting machines are vulnerable because my colleagues and I have hacked them repeatedly. We've created attacks that can spread from machine to machine like a computer virus, and silently change election outcomes, and in every single case We've found ways for attackers to sabotage machines and to steal votes. Across the country, there are about 52 different models of machines. They they fall into essentially 2 styles. Ones that scan a piece of paper or ones where the vote, the voter just interacts with the touch screen. And many of them have been analyzed now by researchers, looking for security vulnerabilities. In every single case where a US voting machine has been analyzed by competent security researchers, They have found vulnerabilities that would let someone inject malicious software and change election data. Every single case. Speaker 1: The better or the more efficient way of hacking machines would be to subvert them all through the machine that's used to actually program those machines. So prior to each election, the county election office or the voting machine vendor will actually program memory cards for that election. It tells the machine who are the candidates, what are the, you know, the the contests being decided, and that gets It's inserted into the voting machine. If you can alter, if you can subvert that machine that is used to program those memory cards, then you can pass rogue software to the voting machine. Speaker 0: Voting machines that are not connected to the internet. This is something that you hear all the time in the US from election officials. Unfortunately, it's not actually true. Many new voting machines that come with 4 gs wireless modems so that they can be connected to the internet from the polling place in order to upload the results faster. Now to me, that sounds crazy. Why would you want to put your voting machines on the Internet right in the middle of the election, potentially at the most vulnerable Speaker 2: time. Studies conducted in 2007 by the state of California, state of Ohio, state of Florida found security vulnerabilities that could take advantage of these To engineer viruses where 1 compromised voting machine could then infect eventually the entire fleet of machines for an entire county. Typically at the end of the election day, you move a memory card through each of the machines in the precinct, and that's to collect the vote totals. That process can spread a virus. And there are other processes. The details vary from machine to machine. Speaker 3: When you say hacked, what were they able to do once they gained access to the machines? Speaker 4: All sorts of Executally manipulate the outcome of the vote. They could manipulate the tally. They could delete the tally, and and they could compromise the vote in any number of ways. Speaker 5: The machines used in Georgia have been demonstrated to be hackable through a virus that's carried on ballot definition cartridges. Very much like this Duxnet virus was inserted into nuclear centrifuges in Iran. Speaker 3: There are a number of states that outsource their reporting of elections to third parties, some of which are corporations based in other countries like Spain. So you've got to trust that the aggregation of the votes and the reporting of the votes is accurate as well. Speaker 0: I'm pretty sure my undergrad computer security class at Michigan could have changed the outcome of the 2016 teen Michigan election if we wanted to. It is that bad. And we have a combination of very powerful adversaries, and unfortunately quite vulnerable and obsolete systems. That's that's why I say it's only a matter of time. Speaker 6: Unfortunately, in a lot of these systems, The audit trails are just as vulnerable as the other aspects of the system. So there may not be good forensic evidence of a successful intrusion. With the current design, we cannot be universally confident that it hasn't happened. And it's probably only a matter of time before it will. Speaker 7: I come here today as a computer scientist who spent the better part of the last quarter century studying Election system security. As you're well aware, the integrity of elections across the US depends heavily on the integrity of computers and Software systems. Unfortunately, much of this infrastructure has proven dangerously vulnerable to tampering and attack, and in some cases, In ways that cannot be easily detected or corrected, after the fact. These vulnerabilities can create practical avenues for, corrupt candidates or foreign adversaries to do everything from cause large scale disruption on Election Day to potentially, undetectably alter, election outcomes in some cases. So let me begin with the voting equipment itself. To be blunt, it's a widely recognized, really indisputable fact that every piece of computerized voting equipment in use at polling places today Can be easily compromised, in ways that have the potential to disrupt election, operations, compromise firmware and software, Potentially alter, vote tallies in the absence of, other safeguards. This is partly a consequence of historically poor design and implementation by equipment vendors, but it's ultimately a reflection of the nature of complex software. It's simply beyond the state of the art, to build software systems that can reliably withstand targeted attack By a determined adversary in this kind of an environment. The vulnerabilities are real. They're serious. And absent a surprising and very fundamental break through in my field, which I would welcome, but I don't see coming, soon, probably inevitable. We give most of the attention to vulnerabilities in voting machines, But that's not the whole story. Each of the more than 5,000 jurisdictions responsible for running elections across the nation Must maintain a number of critical information systems that are attractive targets for disruption by adversaries. Most important of these are voter registration databases, the systems that report, final results, and so forth. Unfortunately, There are even fewer standards for how to secure these systems. The administration of these systems varies widely. And the threats against these systems are often even more, acute than the threats against individual voting systems. You know, just as we don't expect the local sheriff to single handedly defend against military ground invasions, we shouldn't expect county election IT managers to defend against cyber attacks by foreign intelligence services, but that's precisely what we've been asking them, to do. Speaker 0: I'm a professor of computer science and have spent the last 10 years studying the electronic voting systems that our nation relies on. My conclusion from that work is that our highly computerized election infrastructure that is vulnerable to sabotage, and even to cyber attacks that could change votes. These realities risk making our election results more difficult for the American people to trust. I know America's voting machines are vulnerable because my colleagues and I have hacked them repeatedly, as part of a decade of research, studying the technology that operates elections and learning how to make it stronger. We've created attacks that can spread from machine to machine, like a computer virus, and silently change election outcomes. We've studied touch screen and optical scan systems, and in every single case we've found ways for attackers to sabotage machines and to steal votes. These capabilities are certainly within reach for America's enemies. As you know, states choose their own voting technology. And while some states are doing well with security, others are alarmingly vulnerable. This puts the entire nation at risk. In close elections, an attacker can probe the most important swing states or swing counties, find areas with the weakest protection, and strike there. In a close election year changing a few votes in key, localities could be enough to tip national results. The key lesson from 2016 is that these threats are real. Some say the fact that voting machines aren't directly connected to the Internet makes them secure, but unfortunately this is not true. Voting machines are not as distant from the Internet as they may seem. So the way these attacks work Is that before every election, every voting machine needs to be programmed with the design of the ballot, the names of the races and candidates. And voting officials do that by inserting a memory card into the machine. If an attacker can infect that memory card With malicious code, well, when the memory card is inserted into the machine, it can change the programming running on the voting machine And caused the voting machine to, at the end of the election, output whatever results the attacker wants. Speaker 5: The machine that I hacked is called the Sequoia AVC Advantage, now called the Dominion AVC Advantage. It's in The computer program that counts the votes on this machine is in a read only memory that's mounted in a socket on the motherboard. To hack this machine, you have to Remove that memory chip from its socket and install a memory chip, on which you've prepared a cheating program. The cheating program that I prepared, has an extra 100 lines of code basically that, when the polls are about to close, it goes in there and changes some votes stored in the machine. And there is an electronic log of all votes cast, so it changes the log too. So to install that, the attacker doesn't need to be a computer scientist, the attacker just needs to have A bunch of copies of this memory chip, with the fraudulent program on it. And for each voting machine, unscrew 10 screws to remove the panel that that covers the motherboard, pry out the ROM chip containing the legitimate program and install the ROM chip containing the fraudulent program. Other kinds of voting machines store their computer program that counts to votes in flash memory. And this can be updated Under the control of whatever computer program happens to be running in the voting machine. These voting machines, typically the generation developed in the 1990s and after, can be hacked without actually physically changing any hardware in the machine, just by installing a software upgrade Memory card in the same slot that one would normally install the ballot definition. And this particular attack was demonstrated by my colleague at Princeton, Professor Felton, In about 2007, working with 2 of his graduate students. But it's not just us at Princeton, there are many kinds of voting machines and The same kinds of hacks are applicable to all voting machines and have been demonstrated at several other universities, including University of Connecticut, Johns Hopkins, Michigan and others. There are cyber security issues in all parts of our election system. Before the election, voter registration databases. During the election, voting machines. After the election, vote tabulation, canvassing, precinct aggregation computers. Installing new software in a voting machine is not really much different from installing new software in any other kind of computer. Installing new software is how you hack a voting machine to cheat. In 2009, in the courtroom of the Superior Court of New Jersey, I demonstrated how to hack a voting machine. I wrote a vote stealing computer program that shifts votes from 1 candidate to another. Installing that vote stealing program in a voting machine takes 7 minutes per machine with a screwdriver. But really the software I built was not rocket science. Any computer programmer could write the same code. Once it's installed, it could steal elections without detection for years to come. Voting machines are often delivered to polling places several days before the election, to elementary schools, churches, firehouses. In these locations, anyone could gain access to a voting machine for 10 minutes. Between elections, the machines are routinely opened up for maintenance by county employees or private contractors. Let's assume they have the utmost integrity. But still in the US we try to run our elections so that we can trust the election results without relying on any one individual. Other computer scientists have demonstrated similar hacks on many models of machine. This is not just 1 glitch in 1 manufacturer's machine. It's the very nature of computers. So how can we trust our elections when it's so easy to make the computers cheat? Speaker 8: Mr. Appel, in that scenario, an attacker would actually have to have access to all 100 in the 1 county in order to manipulate the records. Speaker 5: In Georgia, that's not the case. The machines used in Georgia Have been demonstrated to be hackable through a virus that's carried on ballot definition cartridges, very much like this Stuxnet virus was, inserted into nuclear centrifuges in Iran. So, and in Speaker 8: that auditing system, in the auditing of these machines. We look at that. Is that correct? Speaker 5: I'm sorry. Can you repeat the question? Speaker 8: So, in those machines that have that vulnerability in the auditing process. Isn't that scanned? Don't we scan for that? Speaker 5: It's difficult to scan for that vulnerability in the sense of if you Ask a machine to report what software is loaded in it. If it's fraudulent software, it will lie. So, the AccuVote TS machines, used in Georgia and in a few counties in other states are particularly vulnerable to this kind of virus that can be carried to the machines even if the criminal attacker doesn't touch the machines or is not even in the same state with the machines. Cap. Speaker 9: With parts made all over the world, and software made all over the world, and as Sherry said, there's only 3 or 4 manufacturers, the the one core point That kind of election security experts and others have been making about why our votes are safe was that the decentralized nature of our, Voting systems, the thousands and thousands of of, voting offices around the country that administer the election is what kept safe because Russians would need to have tens of thousands of operatives go get physical access to machines to actually, infiltrate the election. We now know that's false. And that through a handful of simple attacks, into manufacturers not in the United States, The Russians could plant malware into, thousands of machines all at once and hack the entire U. S. Election without ever leaving the Kremlin. Speaker 10: Or is there a different way where you could just hack one machine and that would transmit a bug to other machines in the precinct, again, even though they're not connected to an internet. Speaker 2: Sure. So before we had an Internet, we had computers with floppy drives. And there were computer viruses that could spread from 1 computer to another over floppies. Electronic voting machines, some of them use memory cards, some of them have these big battery packs, some of them have local area networks. Studies conducted in 2007 by the state of California, state of Ohio, state of Florida found security vulnerabilities that could take advantage of these to engineer viruses where 1 compromised voting machine could then infect eventually the entire fleet of machines for an entire county. And Each of these studies found ways that regular poll workers and election officials going through their standard procedures and and standard operations Could unwittingly be used to transmit viruses from 1 machine to another through the motion. Typically at the end of the election day, you move a memory card through each of the machines in the precinct, and that's to collect the vote totals. That process can spread a virus. And there are other processes. The details vary from machine to machine. Speaker 10: Okay. So it's accurate to say that just because something is not connected to the internet, it does not have a vulnerability to cyber attack. Speaker 2: Being disconnected from the Internet helps, but it's not a panacea, okay? Speaker 11: When you and your colleagues hacked election systems, did you get caught? Speaker 0: We hacked, election systems as part of academic research where we had machines in our system. Did you get caught? Speaker 11: Did they did they see your intrusion into their systems? Speaker 0: The one instance when I was invited to hack a real voting system to while people were watching, was in Washington, D. C. In 2010, and in that instance it took less than 48 hours for us to change all the votes, and we were not caught. Speaker 11: Vice, Chairman. Speaker 0: I have sitting in my office right now actually, a deep old AccuVote TSX machine, a touchscreen machine that's still in use in 23 states, where, I've hacked it to give whatever outcome I want. It it really is that easy. And when you're talking about, when you're talking about these attacks, though, I don't think it's something that, You know, just in every case, a, a freshman in college could do it. Some states are a little bit better protected, but that's not who we're up against. We're up against nation state attackers that are among some of the most Powerful, adversaries in the world when it comes to cyber attacks, and which have routinely compromised highly protected sites like, like military installations, and large tech companies. I think that's the thing that I want voting officials and and voters to understand is quite what they're up against. And we have a combination of very powerful adversaries and series, and unfortunately quite vulnerable and obsolete systems. That's why I say it's only a matter of time. Speaker 3: The standard arguments that, our elections can't be hacked in the US are some combination of physical security. You can't get access to the devices, they're not connected to the internet, they're tested before Election Day, and the system is too decentralized. It's run by, you know, a bunch of individual election officials and individual counties and and jurisdictions. So it's it's a it's a hard target. Most of this has already been debunked by, the previous speakers, but, physical security is pretty lax. Equipment, has sleepovers in school gymnasiums, and churches, and this and that. There are lots of, examples on the Internet of photos of, election, equipment warehouses, where the the Election officials warehouses with the door propped open and nobody watching. Just, it's just not true. It isn't true that the machines aren't connected to the Internet, and even if they weren't to the Internet that would still be hackable through other means. One of the things that hasn't been mentioned so far yet is supply chain hacks. There are components in these voting systems that come from foreign countries. A colleague of ours, Karsten Sherman, at the IT University of Copenhagen, Found Chinese pop songs in memory of a voting machine that he bought, on the Internet. So that those songs somehow made it through the quality control of The election equipment vendor, and then through, how many elections that it was actually used in by the local election official, and, and, you know, we're still there. Moreover, there's an issue in reporting, which I'm not going to talk about that much, but there are a number of states that outsource their reporting of elections to third parties, some of which are corporations based in other countries like Spain. So you've got to trust that the aggregation of the votes and the reporting of the votes is is, is accurate as well. There's a lot of technology being rolled out in this election, that had either not been used or not been used as widely before. This includes, much more widespread reliance on things like electronic poll books, which become a point of vulnerability that can disenfranchise people if they malfunction, if they lose their Internet connection, or if they've been hacked, some jurisdictions are relying on uploading election results using cellular modems or, the internet That, of course, introduces another point of vulnerability, not just to the data that's flowing, but also to the software, the devices that, that are being connected. Voting equipment itself, there are states that have rolled out touchscreen voting for all in person voters. This is, An unnecessary introduction of brittle and vulnerable technology. Many pieces of electronic technology that are involved in elections are Either incorporate, devices that were built overseas, or assembled overseas, and many crucial functions are being outsourced to foreign companies. One, noteworthy example that I'm especially concerned about, there is a Spanish firm, called CITL, which runs, they they provide election reporting for something like 11 US states. They're based in Spain, and they're bankrupt. So that could, obviously, is a point of failure where, someone could shed a lot of mistrust over the election results By simply falsifying what gets posted, even if the correct results could ultimately be recovered from durable reliable records, that would certainly, cast a lot of fear uncertainty and doubt on what's going on. There have been ransomware attacks on, government systems now including some voting systems, We know that there are cyber warfare attacks by Russia, China, Iran and North Korea. There most states voter registration databases were, penetrated in 2016, there is a lot of evidence that data were changed, but that could certainly happen this time around. So all in all, there's a lot of confusion, there are a lot of points of vulnerability. There are a lot of known problems. There are some election vendors who have been hacked, before 2016. VR systems was hacked in Florida. Some of their clients were, there were phishing attacks against them this time, around, let's see, I forgot my name of it. Tyler Technologies, which provides some, vote by mail ballot, tracking and some vote aggregation reporting has also been hacked. So overall, there's an awful lot that can go wrong. Speaker 12: He saw no evidence of, Tampering with, no, voter voting machines or voter tallies. That's not true. It didn't happen. We just didn't see the evidence of it. Speaker 13: Well, there has been never a documented incident when votes have been changed during the real election. And my answer was please continue using these machines and that will remain to be true forever, Because these machines don't have a capability of providing you forensic evidence to see if they cannot prove they were honest, they cannot prove that they were have been hacked. They simply don't have the fundamental basic capabilities of providing you that forensic evidence, that data. Only way you can see that that machine was hacked if the attacker wanted to be found that it was hacked. That's a sad truth. So Anyone who says I have a information one way or another, that's an opinion. That's not fact based. Fact is, it can be done without leaving trace. Speaker 14: When you know how the system for looking for the evidence, you know that you won't find it because the systems are not recording, Generating, preserving or protecting meaningful forensic evidence. And this is from the very beginning to the end of the process everywhere. These systems really don't have a capability of recording and protecting any meaningful audit information or forensically important information. So a lot of times I would also argue that even if you try to take a look into the into the evidence, the problem is that there is no Evidence which is trustworthy and and worth on a lot. Even recently, a case where a voting machine was reporting, and I believe that was in the last year in North voting machine was in the race where they had 50,000 votes cast, was cast reporting to 1 candidate 164 or something like that votes. And when the paper was looped, that person actually get 26,000 vote and vote by 1 by 1,000 votes. Speaker 12: Wow. Speaker 14: So we we really need to have that paper ballot. There's nothing we don't have a technology to do electronic voltage. The problem the most most Driving thing is, first of all, from 2006 to now is nothing changed. The actual same version of software I hacked 2005 is still in use. It's those machines are still in 20 states. Mhmm. So they're still around. Even the so called new sold today is In the end of life version of of Windows, etcetera, like, just something which no other industry would be acceptable, would be remotely acceptable. So I think the most as overall, it is how outdated everything is And and how hard it is to make people to understand the the reality and and get the warning through that this needs to be fixed or things will get really, really worse, turn the worse. They're bad right now, but and I cannot even Cannot imagine what the worst would be looking like. Parties, they are not actually but a lot of these voting machines are not US origin. And I'm not only talking about the components being made in China or a voting machine being assembled in in Philippines, but also the very of the machine, the programming. In many many many voting machines, that programming, either whole or in the large part is Coming from a foreign from code sources. And it seems to be the case that actually the voting machine vendors, Generally speaking, either don't know or they refuse to tell the truth where the code actually comes. And it turned out that the system he is using exactly the same system which created this magnitude 16,022 votes in Volusia County for Al Gore. So I took a look into the system, figured out a couple of ways to manipulate the central tabulator. But I told I on this well, this is not elegant. You leave a audit trail. You leave a evidence, the bet bet, breadcrumbles. You can trace it. I was asked, well, if there what is the elegant way? So I have I don't know if there's 1. But if if there is, it's gotta be this memory card. Speaker 15: So it's so it's a memory card that fits into the voting machine that you found could be the more or less untraceable or hard to trace way to manipulate the results, whereas they were thinking it was something in the machine. You thought this was attack because you would see a ton of evidence and, like you said, breadcrumbs being left by the tampering party. Speaker 14: Well, it's it's no. It's if not even that. I was just Thinking about the architecture of the system. And with that architecture, it made sense that there's executable program in the memory card. And I was quickly told that that's impossible because it's against the certified rules. But, also, the vendor was dishonest about the origin of the card. So, well, if they are not Honest about one thing they're probably not honest about. The second thing, I found an executable program on a memory card. I found it's it's completely unprotected. This This memory card is so old. It's older than floppy drive. So it actually, I found it because I was I remember that I have seen it before floppy drives existed. So that's what I found who was the original manufacturer of it. And a, interesting The thing about this explanation afterwards was that demand 16,000 was malfunction Of the memory card, that's the, that's the reason why it happened. Not possible. That reason why it's not possible is that that memory card Doesn't know how to make negative numbers. So whatever caused that man respond 16,000 votes, which we don't know what caused it. At least the official explanation given at the time, not possible. Something else happened. Speaker 1: So everyone was focused in 2000 on the punch card machines and the problems that that brought. But in Fallucia County, there was an incident that occurred. It didn't A lot of attention. And the attention that it did get sort of disappeared and got lost in all of the focus on the punch card machines. What happened in Volusia County was around At 10 p. M. Midnight or sorry, 10 p. M. On election night. Prior to that, Al Gore in Volusia County was ahead of George Bush. But around 10 p. M, suddenly, Al Gore's number started reversing. And it reversed more than 16,000 votes. And in There aren't, it was all happening in 1 precinct, and of course, there weren't 16,000 voters in that 1 precinct. So Gore's numbers were actually showing a negative 16,000 in that precinct. And the explanation that election officials provided was that, a faulty memory card was inserted into the tabulating machine. Now, it wasn't, the, let's say, legitimate memory card. So there was 1 memory card for this precinct, and it was uploaded to a tabulator on election night. But the logs show that an hour after that memory card was uploaded, another 2nd memory card for that same precinct was uploaded. And after that 2nd card was uploaded, that's when the votes for Gore started disappearing. And no one has been able to explain what exactly happened with that, whether that was a rogue card that was intentionally designed to hack the votes and misfired and therefore, Erased too many votes for Gore or whether this was, you know, a software mishap. But no one has explained why 2 memory cards for the same precinct were uploaded. And that's that's sort of the main problem in terms of chains of custody, the fact that a second memory card was actually ever able to be uploaded. Speaker 6: And John Kerry has expressed misgivings about the 2004 vote in Ohio. Speaker 1: Yes. So they had concerns about the machines in Ohio. Ohio was still largely using punch card machines. They hadn't replaced theirs yet. But there were still counties there were counties that were already using optical scan machines and also paperless DRE machines. And he and his group, he revealed this only recently, actually went to court court to try and obtain the algorithms, the software, to look at the software to make sure that it would be counting votes accurately. And the courts denied access to it because the proprietary software on voting machines is considered a trade secret. And so the private voting machine companies go to court to fight against this, and the courts generally agree with them. Speaker 14: When I and others, when we 2005, 2006 got involved And up until 2008, we all thought now when the problem has been exposed, it will be fixed very quickly. It would it was completely Always incomprehensible for me and and other secretary researchers that now 2020, we are talking about this topic. And, also, we are 2020 using the same machines with the same software. It's just you wouldn't be using a a 30 year old PC with with no security patches, But that's exactly how the elections are conducted. Let's talk about everything in the world how this works. Speaker 16: Okay. Speaker 17: So Speaker 14: you have a voting message, a voting terminal. That's how you pass your ballot, either electronically or paper ballot, it's go scanning. And after that, these machines are reporting those results Very often, our our communication lies through the central tabulator. Now in both in the county level, or or state level, where the votes are accumulated in database, and along the path, there are number of data storage, systems databases. And if you manipulate those, you can create an illusion of a different results. And you can even do it in the about election reporting system. So instead of even hacking anything in the tabulator system, you are just creating wrong reporting. So there are a number of ways how you can, through this whole path, influence the results. And we have to actually step even further back, Steph, because if we look the election as whole, it's a myriad of system. We have voter registration system. Them. We have electronic poll book systems. We have the election management. We have the ballot casting. We have the tabulation, and we have the reporting. Any of these, if you have one of these, you can always have the result. You can disenfranchise voters so they can cast their ballot. You can change the the outcome. You can change the reporting. Each of these needs to be secured. None of these is less important than the others. And that's why we have been I think in the public mind, we have been focusing in a very narrow area, Which is you cast a ballot on how the ballot is counted, but not missing the whole big picture. How many other systems from a adversary, how from from ethical's point of view, where the other can go and achieve the same goal. How about the Internet? It really it's everything is connected to Internet either directly or indirectly. And the more modern voting machines, they actually have a mobile phone Modem, in to speak, they have a they have a mobile phone mobile phone connectivity to county headquarters. They are sending the results. So wireless is coming back to the voting message in the newer generations. Nice marketing material trying to tell it's not, but it is. A journalist in a year ago, she found 200 voting machines in the Internet. Voting machine vendors say, well, they are not in Internet because they are not pingable. My answer to that is, are you from the past? Because since since 15 years ago, nothing is really anymore pingable, And they are still connected to Internet. It's the the whole argument is 15 that argument was to have been meaning something 15 years ago. It doesn't mean anything today. And, again, I I was just came from Atlanta, and and they have new working machines because the judge ordered the old ones to be scrapped. And part of the things in the the judge's ruling was that, The finding was that the voting machine were programmed by basically 3 guys from their homes and who sent all the programming of the voting machine for next hours and over Internet to We distribute all the machines. Speaker 15: Oh, so these guys had programmed the machines from home, and then they they pushed the code update to the voting machines via the Internet. Speaker 14: We what they said but they pushed it to the state, and then the state pushed it to the counties. And, actually, this whole thing about, the critical election specific programming going over Internet is very common because lot of this programming is done by private companies, third party management companies. And it's, it has been shocking the last 2 years when I have been working for a number of secretaries of state And looking how the security has done in their state just to find that email, FTP with no security. These are the common methods to send the most mission critical programming from the private company, which might be out of state, to the local county who is putting it into the machines. It is whoever controls that data controls the election. Speaker 15: And these machines, they like you said, they have network cards. You show in Kill Chain, again, the documentary that we'll link in the show notes, that they have USB ports. They have memory card slots. They have modems and phone jacks sometimes. So these things were built for connectivity. They're not immune to connectivity. And we don't by the seem seemingly, we don't have to hack Hundreds of machines. These are networked. You can just make software that infects 1 and then dozens of others or just changes the data. Do you think we could, Is it possible so do you think it's possible that we could create a worm that it yet we get on 1 machine in the voting center and it just connects to the other machines covertly and infects them without the bad actors so much as laying a hand on the machine themselves. Speaker 14: The real, proof of concept virus was demonstrated over 10 years ago. So, that that already has been demonstrated publicly that voting machine virus which can, self propagate from 1 voting machine to another, that's a reality which We have sown it's possible. So beyond and that's one of the things why that was created was because, Again, when you say it's possible by showing the vulnerability, people said, well, I don't believe until you show it. So it's one of the rear Things where, a team of researchers developed in the actual virus just to show the logical outcome of the the the vulnerability. Yes. There can be a voting machine virus. Full stop. Here it is. Speaker 18: We've heard a lot from voting machine vendors and election officials that voting machines Can't be hacked because they're not connected to the Internet. All of those vulnerabilities that Andrew talked about, are not a problem because no one can access the machines. And it turns out that the message that they've been giving us for years, and particularly after the 2016 election, just isn't true. Voting machine vendors have sold election officials on these in use of modems. In some cases, the modems are embedded inside the voting machines. In other cases, there are external modems that get attached to the voting machine at the end of the election. So at the end of the election, the machine goes into shutdown mode And then this option pops up about modoming results. And so the system will automatically then dial in and send these votes, over a cellular modem to a server on the Internet that collects the results. So everyone will tell you, and they've told me every time I've spoken with them, that cellular modems are not really Internet connectivity. They will say that doesn't mean that the machine is connected to the Internet. It's using a cellular modem. Well, that's not true. And Election Systems and Software, which is tax. This is one of their statements over and over again with the public. But this is one of their own diagrams that they actually gave to Rhode Island in 2015. And if you see that circular part in the centre there showing that modem transmission using a wireless modem, They sit there, right there. It's on their own diagram that it's going over the internet. So what happens is that the transmission of the votes votes, that the voting machine will dial in using the cellular modem and it contacts the nearest cell tower. And then the data goes through that cell tower into the carrier's back end network. But then the data actually has to get to that county network, and it goes over the Internet to a system, a server that's on the Internet to receive those votes. So we've already now basically shown the misinformation of the transmission of those votes. So ES and S will then say, well, it doesn't matter because all of that process is secured. So the transmission of the votes are secured so that no one can intercept them and read the votes or alter them. The modem is configured in such a way so that no one can actually dial into the modem, it can only dial out, and it can only dial out when the machine shuts down at the end of the election. So apparently, there are all of these safeguards. And also, the back end system that receives the transmitted votes is supposed to communicate only with one of those authenticated machines with the modem. The problem is none of this has been tested or certified. The voting machines themselves go through sort of a federal testing lab process And through certification, the modem transmissions don't. So we don't know what's inside those modems. We don't know how they work. We don't know how they're configured. And ES and S doesn't have a good track record on implementing security. So we don't actually know that the way that they are saying that these are transmitted securely is actually case. So what can happen with a modem machine that's transmitting? So I don't know if you're familiar with something called a stingray. It's a device that law enforcement uses and the military uses. And what it does is it, masquerades as a legitimate cell tower. It transmits a much more powerful signal than the nearby cell tower so that your cell phone will connect to the stingray instead of the cell tower. And then it might pass it on to the cell tower as well. It's mostly used for tracking phones, but there are also Stingrays that are designed also to intercept the content of communication. So if you've got a cellular modem in a voting machine, a rogue person can put a rogue cell tower near some kind of voting precinct, whatever. And instead of that modem then connecting to that cell tower, they can connect to that rogue The rogue cell tower. You can intercept data. If it's not properly encrypted, you could intercept the data and change the results. Or you could basically swap out the a whole package of results if it's not authentically signed, and replace it with your own package of results. And so those go on to the server. If there's a vulnerability in that modem, A hacker can actually transmit malware back onto that voting machine through the rogue cell tower. And once you're in that voting machine, Either that way or maybe you've gotten into the voting machine prior when it's being programmed, you now actually control the configuration of that modem. So even if ES and S says that modem will only work at the end of the election and will only call out and not receive calls in. If you control the configuration of that modem, you change all of that. You can have that machine contact your system at any time you want, for however you want, so that you can do reconnaissance on that machine and study it and established your attack. There were a group of researchers that decided that they would try and see if they could find those backend servers that receive the votes that are transmitted by modem. So if you've got something that's transmitting the votes over the cellular network, there's something that has to be connected to the internet to receive them. So there is a server. And it turns out that they could actually, based on configuration information that's publicly available on the internet, that the voting machine vendors provide to election offices and the election offices post on the internet. They describe the type of that we have created a firewall that they use. It's made by Cisco. They describe the type of FTP software that receives the votes, that sits on that server. They describe the whole configuration, including the type of cellular modem that's embedded in their machines. So based on that information, they decided to see if they could look for that very specific footprint of ESNS machines that are receiving the votes. And they did a scan and they were able to find these systems on the Internet. So they found 9 Wisconsin counties that had systems connected to the Internet, 7 Florida counties, from 4 Michigan counties. They actually found systems in 10 different states, but these were the primary ones. And of course, these are all important critical swing states. So here's the thing. Election officials will tell you, well, the modem transmissions don't matter because we only turn on those modems for a very brief period, less than a minute at the end of the election to transmit. And that's not sufficient time for someone to hack. Any of the technical attack. But more importantly, it turns out these systems aren't just connected for a few minutes after an election. Those back end systems that receive the votes are quite often connected year round. You can see them when they're doing the scans. You can sometimes see them. They come up a couple of weeks. Some of the ones that are only up temporarily will sometimes come up a couple of weeks before the election because they want to test the transmission. And then they leave it on for those weeks before the election. And after the election, they might forget to take it down and it might stay up a couple of other weeks. But there are some that simply never take them down at all. And Wisconsin was one of them. They were on year round. These systems, so what are they? I describe this as a server, but that sounds kind of benign. What is happening is that the The votes are being transmitted, and on the receiving end there's a firewall that's connected to the internet. And behind the firewall, There is this FTP server that the votes are transmitted on. Now that FTP server is supposed to serve as kind of like a DMZ, a safe zone, right? So the votes are deposited and there's supposed to be then no direct connection to the system that actually tabulates the votes. But it turns out that's not the case at all. This is a diagram that ES and S created and handed out to election officials. And so you can see that the votes are coming over the Internet, and they're coming and there's the firewall, and then you see all those wires connected. And you see at the bottom there that EMS, that's the Election Management system. That is the system that tabulates the final results. So even though they say that, that transmission of votes over the Internet is just unofficial, Connected to that system that's receiving those unofficial votes is also the system that is tabulating the official results. What's more, that election management system is also used to program all the voting machines prior to an election. So when, I brought this To ES and S's attention, they didn't then say that nothing is connected to the Internet. What they said was none of those critical systems are pingable from the Internet because there's a firewall in front. So essentially what they're saying is that even though now first they've said that none of these systems are connected to the Internet. And now when they're faced with someone saying, well, they actually are connected, they say, well, they may be configured in some manner that you're showing, but there's a firewall in front of them and therefore, you can't see what's behind the firewall. But if you can find the firewall, then you find the systems that are behind the firewall. The only thing that's protecting anyone from getting into those critical systems behind the firewall are the rules of that firewall that say, only these certain systems can connect to us, only these certain systems can transmit data. That's simply software. It's configuration rules. And if you misconfigure that software, then anything can get into that firewall. And of course, many, many hacks happen because firewalls are misconfigured. Speaker 0: I was part of the team that did the first hands on study of any electronic voting machine used in the US and it was using exactly this machine. And what we found, well, we got one of these machines from a whistleblower, Brought it into a laboratory. Reverse engineered it. And well, here's the result of what we found. We we would run a mock election with George Washington and Benedict Arnold, just like this. And, wanted to know, well, if an attacker that could get malicious software into the machine somehow. Could they change the results? And what we found after reverse engineering the machine was, well, Yeah. There are actually a lot of problems with it. All the records of the vote are contained in, in computer memory. And, an attacker can manipulate the software that's supposed to be running in the machine in a pretty straightforward way. Before every election, officials program the machine with the names of the candidates on the ballot by, installing some that they can change the software running in the machine. There are, unauthenticated software update mechanisms, there are offer overflows and the code that reads the data files from this. There's even an interpreted programming language and the rules for how the votes will be counted are contained in an unauthenticated program contained on the memory card. So through any of those means, An attacker can change the software running on the voting machine and cause the machine to produce whatever election results they want. So that was in about 2007. We, we published the first paper about this. In and that's what we're going to do. And so we're going to have to do that. And so we're going to have to do that. And so we're flows and so forth. There have been hundreds and hundreds of pages of technical reports about US voting machines like this. But even after that, They haven't even updated the software since before the studies I talked about. That's how bad it is. And it's not even just a single model of machine that's the only problem. Country. There are about 52 different models of machines. They fall into essentially 2 styles, ones that scan a piece of paper or ones where the vote, the voter just interacts with the touch screen and many of them have been analyzed now by researchers, Looking for security vulnerabilities. In every single case where a US voting machine has been analyzed by by competent in security researchers. They have found vulnerabilities that would let someone inject malicious software and change election data, every single case. Before every election, election officials have to program the voting machines with who's on the ballot and what are the rules for counting. Well, they make that election programming on a PC workstation somewhere, either at the, at the jurisdiction or at an outside vendor that does it for them. If an attacker can break into that workstation which is called an election management system. They can spread malicious code to all of the memory cards used to program all of the voting machines in the jurisdiction. And those election management system workstations sometimes are connected to the internet, or they're, or the data that's programmed into them passes through an internet connected system. So we're just 1 or 2 hops away from an online attacker. Now how well secured are these systems? Well, here's, a vendor that did the election programming for, in a large fraction of my state in 2016. And we can just take a look at their website to see how secure this is likely to be. You can see, first of all, they don't have any HTTPS. Here are lots of nice, high resolution photographs of their warehouse, in case you want to break in. And perhaps most interestingly, here's their employee directory with everyone's name, job title, email address and photograph. So if I wanted to break into this company, let's say I was the attacker, I'd probably start by forging an email from, let's say, Larry, the president here, to Sue, his administrative assistant, asking her to urgently open an attachment. Now, of course, when she does, that attachment has my malware in it. I have a foothold into their network, and I can try to spread from there to the election management system and to the voting machines in most of the state. Tampering with the national election result in my country it's easier than well, easier than even I thought in 2016. I keep learning things that convince me that the situation is scarier than, than even experts had thought. You identify the states that are most weakly protected and going to be close. Target the computers that are going to program voting machines there, spread malware to machines to change a fraction of the votes, and then rely on the fact that most states, even if they have a paper record, are not going to rigorously use it to check that the computers are right. But the fact is that in close national contests in the US, the result really only hinges on the result in a small number of states. You've heard about the swing states in any given election. The ones that are, really competitive. In such a situation, an attacker can, before the election, identify which states are likely to be close. Try probing all of them in the way that the Russians did the voter registration systems in 2016 and just find the weakest swing states and attack there. So in this way, the American system converts, diversity of implementation into basically this patchwork of strength and weakness that gives attackers a menu of possible places to strike. It makes us weaker in close elections. So just to review, you look at the polls before the election and figure out which states were likely to be close. Probe all of them, find the ones with the weakest protection, then hack into the, election management systems there or at the outside vendors the states use. Once you hack into the election management system, you can spread malicious code to individual voting machines and have your code say, swap 10% of the votes in the places you infected. Then even if the votes are also recorded on a piece of paper, you don't have to worry. Because in most of those states, they're going to just toss the paper out without looking Speaker 5: Modems in voting machines are a bad idea. Those modems are network connections. And that leaves them vulnerable to hacking by anybody who can connect to that network. Speaker 19: ESNS insists While there are 14,000 of its modems in use, there are firewalls separating those modems from the public Internet. Speaker 5: Once a hacker Starts talking to the voting machine through the modem. They can hack the software in the voting machine and make it cheat in future elections. Speaker 17: What is the vehicle for the transmission from the ICP? Is it cellular modem versus VPN? It is a cellular modem that can be configured in a VPN. Right. And we currently in Chicago and Cook County, we work with Verizon to, secure that network. What wireless chipset Slash modem does the hardware have? We support a variety. So, it's really up to the jurisdictions, what technology they want to use, what's compatible with their networks. Speaker 16: Currently, in some jurisdictions, we're using, Basically a modem that is a three d modem, GSM, but we can support multiple varieties of modem that can be. Speaker 17: Including latest 4 gs standards Speaker 14: as well. Speaker 17: So the answers to the next question, is it Speaker 3: 3 gs or 4 gs? Verizon, 8 gs or 2 gs or Sprint, Speaker 5: I'm assuming Speaker 17: all? Yeah, all networks. Speaker 15: Just to Speaker 17: ask a quick question. Yes, I mean, we actually transmit from the ICP in Mongolia as well. So Speaker 7: We're not committed to networks. Speaker 16: And in Puerto Rico, there is 3 vendors because the island is not covered by any by any of the vendors completely. So we use 3 different cellular vendors for some ICPs with this vendor Claro, AT and T, MT Mobile, I think, in the different parts of the app. Speaker 14: More modern attack voting machines. They actually have a mobile phone modem, and to speak, they have a they have a mobile phone mobile phone connectivity to county headquarters. They are sending the results. Speaker 3: Some jurisdictions are relying on uploading election results using cellular modems or, the Internet. That of course introduces another point of vulnerability, not just to the data that's flowing, but also to the software, the devices that, that are being connected. Speaker 1: Many of these voting machines have modems embedded into them. And the modems are used at the end of the election to transmit the vote totals on election night to the county, The, elections office. So these modems contact their cellular modems, and they contact the cellular network, they contact the cell tower. So the cell tower traffic these In our modern times, it actually goes through Internet. It goes through the same kinds of routers and switches that the regular Internet traffic goes to. But also, in between that cell tower and that voting machine, An intruder can, intercept data going to the cell tower and intercept that that communication, that phone call. If you can trick a voting machine into, contacting your device, A fake cellular tower instead of a legitimate tower. You can actually use that connection to get back into the voting machine and get back into the tabulator, and then alter votes and software. Speaker 20: Virginia just stopped Using touch screen computer voting because it's so vulnerable. Speaker 18: We need to look at Speaker 20: all the voting machines. Every secretary of state needs to be, You know, assisted in making sure that they are not being, hacked and and attacked. Speaker 6: I continue to think that our voting machines are too vulnerable. Speaker 21: But researchers have repeatedly demonstrated That ballot recording machines and other voting systems are susceptible to tampering. Speaker 22: Even hackers with limited prior knowledge, tools, and resources are able to breach voting machines In a matter of minutes. Speaker 23: In 2018, electronic voting machines in Georgia and Texas deleted votes for certain candidates or switched votes from 1 candidate to another. Speaker 21: The biggest seller of voting machines is doing something that violates cyber security 101, directing that you install remote access software, which would make a machine like that, you know, a magnet for fraudsters and hackers. Speaker 24: These voting machines can be hacked quite easily. Speaker 25: You could easily Hack into them. It makes it seem like all these states are doing different things, but in fact 3 companies are controlling that. It is the individual voting machines That some pose that pose some of the greatest risks. Speaker 26: There are a lot of states that are dealing with antiquated machines, Right? Which are vulnerable to being hacked. Speaker 24: Workers were able to easily hack into an electronic voting machine. It was possible to switch votes. 43% Speaker 21: of American voters use voting machines that researchers have found have serious security flaws, Including backdoors. Speaker 3: We know how vulnerable now our systems were. We know I know the hackathon that took place last year, where virtually every machine was broken into fairly quickly. Speaker 26: I actually held a demonstration for my colleagues here at the capitol, where we brought in, folks Who, before our eyes, hacked election machines, those that are not those that are being used in many states. Speaker 22: Aging systems also frequently rely on unsupported software, like Windows XP in 2000, which may not receive regular security patches and are thus more vulnerable To the latest methods of cyber attack. Speaker 24: In a close presidential election, they just need to hack 1 swing state, or maybe 1 or 2, Or maybe just a few counties in one swing step. Speaker 27: I'm very concerned that you could have a hack that finally went through. You have 21 states that were hacked into. They didn't find out about it for a year. Right now, we have over a dozen dozen states That either don't have any backup paper ballots or only have them partially. Do you think that our adversaries don't know what those states are? Of course, they know what those states are. And if we have a close election in the general election, in a presidential race, and one state's out withstanding And their ballot boxes get hacked into, their elections get hacked into, we will have absolutely no backup.

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

25/ In effect, the left was allowed to discuss the vulnerabilities of voting machines after the 2016 election, and the right was banned from social media platforms for discussing those very same vulnerabilities after the 2020 election.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Virginia has stopped using touchscreen computer voting due to vulnerability, highlighting the need to assess all voting machines for potential hacking. Researchers have shown that ballot recording machines and other systems are susceptible to tampering, even by hackers with limited resources. Instances of electronic voting machines in Georgia and Texas deleting or switching votes have been reported. The leading seller of voting machines has violated cybersecurity principles by installing remote access software, making them attractive to fraudsters and hackers. The control of voting machines by just three companies poses significant risks. Many states still use outdated and hackable machines, leaving the election system vulnerable to interference. The lack of backup paper ballots and reliance on unsupported software further exacerbate the security flaws.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Virginia just stopped using touchscreen computer voting because it's so vulnerable. Right. We need to look at all the voting machines. Every secretary of state needs to be, you know, assisted in making sure that they are not being hacked and and attacked. Speaker 1: I continue to think that our voting machines are too vulnerable. Speaker 2: Researchers have repeatedly demonstrated that ballot recording machines and other voting systems are susceptible to tampering. Speaker 0: Even hackers with limited prior knowledge, tools and resources are able to breach voting machines in a matter of minutes. Speaker 3: In 2018, electronic voting machines in Georgia and Texas deleted votes for certain candidates or switch votes from 1 candidate to another. Speaker 4: The biggest seller of voting machines is doing something that violates cybersecurity 101, directing that you install Remote access software, which would make a machine like that, you know, a magnet for fraudsters and hackers. Speaker 5: These voting machines can be hacked quite easily. Speaker 2: You could easily Hack into them. It makes it seem like all these states are doing different things, but in fact 3 companies are controlling that. It is the individual voting machines That some pose, that pose some of the greatest risks. Speaker 6: There are a lot of states that are dealing with antiquated machines, right, which are vulnerable to being hacked. Speaker 5: The workers were able to easily hack into an electronic voting machine. Speaker 4: It was possible to switch votes. 43% of American voters use voting machines that researchers have found have serious security flaws, Including backdoors. Speaker 7: We know how vulnerable now our systems were. We know I know the hackathon that took place last year, Where virtually every machine was broken into fairly quickly. Speaker 6: I actually held a demonstration for my colleagues here at the capitol, where we brought in, folks Who, before our eyes, hacked election machines, those that are not those that are being used in many states. Speaker 8: Aging systems also frequently rely On unsupported software, like Windows XP in 2000, which may not receive regular security patches and are thus more vulnerable To the latest methods of cyber attack. Speaker 5: In a close presidential election, they just need to hack 1 swing state or maybe 1 or 2 Or maybe just a few counties in one swing state. Speaker 2: I'm very concerned that you could have a hack that finally went through. You have 21 states that were hacked into. They didn't find out about it for a year. Right now, we have over a dozen dozen states that either don't have any backup paper ballots Or only have them partially. You think that our adversaries don't know what those states are? Of course, they know what those states are. And if we have a close election in the general election, in a presidential race, and one state's out withstanding and their Ballot boxes get hacked into. Their elections get hacked into. We will have absolutely no backup. Stalin was unconcerned about the vote. After all, he explained, he said that who voted was completely unimportant. What was Extraordinarily important, in his words, was who would count the votes and how. It is time to put politics aside and come together to secure the future of our election. So whether you're a 4 star general, A 4th grade teacher or a computer engineer at Foursquare, this is an issue that unites us. Speaker 8: In at least 40 states, elections are carried out using machines that are at least a decade old. And like any technology, -They're susceptible to increasing failure with age. Some state officials have had to turn to eBay to find critical components like dot matrix printers, Decades old storage devices and analog modems, aging systems also frequently rely on unsupported software Like Windows XP in 2000, which may not receive regular security patches and are thus more vulnerable to the latest Methods of cyber attack. Speaker 3: In 2016, state election websites in Illinois and Arizona were hacked by intruders who installed malware and downloaded sensitive voter information. Speaker 6: It is worth fighting for integrity in our election system, which means that they are free from interference by a hostile Or an unfriendly nation. Let's put the resources into upgrading the state's election systems. Because what we know is this. There are a lot of states that are dealing with antiquated machines, right, which are vulnerable to being hacked. I sit on the senate intelligence committee and senate homeland security committee. And we receive all kinds of information about the vulnerabilities to our national Security. We are vulnerable in terms of foreign interference with our elections. It's my understanding that some of the election system Vendors have required states to sign agreements, that prevent or inhibit independent, security testing. There's a saying that I'm sure Many of you have heard, which is the you know the difference between being hacked and not being hacked? Is knowing you've been hacked. Speaker 0: And they are still looking for ways to steal information about Voter registration, for example. There are some text experts in Silicon Valley Valley with whom I have met who say that, You know, maybe what they'll do this next time is to really disrupt the actual election. Shut down the servers that you send results to. Interfere with the operation of voting machines because still too many of them are linked to the Internet. So there we are still very vulnerable. Speaker 9: I mean, I can tell you in Virginia, when I was governor, I had to replace all the machines. Because I remember when I first voted when I went to Richmond, moved down as governor, I remember I kept voting in the senate race, kept voting for the Democrat. Republican name kept coming up. Three times that happened. Speaker 1: What do Speaker 4: you mean kept Coming up. Speaker 9: So I you know, we had the touch screens. I was voting for Mark Warner, our senator, and Ed Gosphy's name was light up. Happened to me 3 times. Finally, the 4th time, Mark Damon, I quickly hit vote, and I got out of there. You know, all the cameras are looking at me like this guy doesn't know how to vote. I mean, what's going on? So then I had an investigation done, and listen to this. I brought in some technology experts. They were able to hack into our machines from off-site In about 5 or 6 minutes, and within 4 minutes, they were able to change a vote. IDD certified all the machines. Now in Virginia, we have paper ballots. Speaker 4: 43% of American voters use voting machines that researchers have found have Serious security flaws, including backdoors. These companies are accountable to no one. They won't answer basic questions about their cybersecurity practices, and the biggest companies Won't answer any questions at all. 5 states have no paper trail, And that means there is no way to prove the numbers the voting machines put out are legitimate. So much for cybersecurity 101. The vast majority of 10,000 election jurisdictions Nationwide, use election management systems that run on old software That is soon gonna be out of date and ripe for exploitation by hackers according To an exhaustive analysis by the Associated Press, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Michigan, Florida, Iowa, Indiana, Arizona, and North Carolina, among others, Are all at risk. Even the state of Georgia, which just passed legislation to buy new voting machines, is on track to buy equipment that suffers from this significant cybersecurity weakness. Let's say the election is decided by a small percentage And people in America don't think that the election was fair. The effect that would have On our 200 year experiment in self governance, our democratic system Would take a real hit. Our elections weren't secure last week And they sure as heck aren't secure this week. And anybody who says otherwise It's either selling the voting machines or simply has a malicious intent towards our elections. At one point in the intelligence committee, both sides seemed to agree that no votes were changed In the 2016 election, and I said, the experts I talk to say that Until you have a forensic analysis of a vote, until you go in there and scrub the whole system, You can't really say that. So they're giving these voting machines specifically the hack into how successful were they? Speaker 1: Well, the the ongoing record Was, they hacked within 90 minutes of, being, being in the same space as the voting machines. Now these are not hackers that are actually touching the machines. They're doing this from across the room, on, on Internet like connections. But what it demonstrated, Pedro, is that the machines that we count on to make the basic connection between the American voter And the election results are vulnerable if they're in any way connected to the Internet. Speaker 4: And so when you say hacked, what were they able to do once they gained Access to the machines. Speaker 1: All sorts of things. They could manipulate, the outcome of the vote, they could manipulate the tally, they could delete the tally, and and they could compromise the vote in any number of ways. Just it was limited only by the hackers' creativity. Just how vulnerable Speaker 10: the machines were. I mean, what we found is that These machines were purchased by, local voting authorities, state and local voting authorities maybe 10 years ago. In many cases, the software and the hardware have not been updated, so they're as vulnerable as an old laptop That we might have, in in your home that you no longer use because it's just so out of date. Then what we found is that the supply chain for these these machines is largely un plotted. I mean, We found parts from China. We found, digital electronic parts from all over the world. By way of hacking, there's the potential that the actual vote tally could be compromised. So votes could be changed from this to that. Or votes could be suppressed, votes could be deleted, votes could be added, so you could actually change the tally itself.
Vltra_MK
Posted - August 14, 2023 at 9:56 PM
Saved - August 15, 2023 at 12:47 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
@Vltra_MK shared a link, prompting @DecentFiJC to emphasize its importance. @glasses_no then shared two links related to Scytl, a Spanish company involved in reporting election results for US jurisdictions.

@Vltra_MK - Michael Rae Khoury

@DecentFiJC - Jonathan

@Vltra_MK This is incredibly important to understand.😳😳😳

@glasses_no - NoRoseGlasses

@DecentFiJC @Vltra_MK https://www.sott.net/article/244685-A-Spanish-Company-Known-As-Scytl-Will-Be-Reporting-Election-Results-For-Hundreds-of-US-Jurisdictions https://www.sott.net/article/444461-Scytl-voting-software-has-all-the-tools-it-needs-for-election-fraud?ysclid=llbkakirqw845860522

A Spanish Company Known As Scytl Will Be Reporting Election Results For Hundreds of U.S. Jurisdictions -- Sott.net Do you know who is going to be counting the votes on Election Day 2012? Most Americans never even think about this. Most Americans just assume that their votes will count and that the government will ensure that the counting process is done... sott.net
Scytl voting software has all the tools it needs for election fraud -- Sott.net Free Press readers may be familiar with Scytl, the promoter of online and mobile voting, and their apparent connections to the intelligence community. Renewed research into Scytl has revealed new connections to the intelligence community, new... sott.net
BehizyTweets
Posted - August 15, 2023 at 1:03 AM
Saved - August 17, 2023 at 1:21 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Donald Trump indicted in Georgia for questioning 2020 election. Evidence reveals widespread irregularities: unverifiable voting system, counterfeit mail-in ballots, violations of election law, missing ballot images, illegal registrations, and more. Georgia's new voting system lacks accuracy, auditability, and security. Risk Limiting Audits ineffective. BMDs easily hacked. Privacy compromised. Previous election discrepancies ignored. Taxpayers burdened with costly system. Georgia implemented rejected Dominion system. Errors in recounts. Georgia's voting system is flawed and unreliable.

@BehizyTweets - George

Now that Donald Trump has been indicted in Georgia for questioning the results of the 2020 election, I want to remind everyone that it was the most RIGGED election in American history HERE'S PROOF: The U.S. District Court found on Oct 11th, 2020 the Dominion Voting System that was used in the November 2020 election is unverifiable to the voter and in violation of two Georgia statues There are six sworn affidavits of counterfeit mail-in ballots in Fulton Co. election results scaling into the tens of thousands State Farm Arena video shows at least four violations of Georgia election law Approximately 43,000 DeKalb Co. drop box ballots have no chain of custody forms to authenticate them Tru-Vote Geo tracking showed evidence of ballot harvesting teams driving repeatedly to drop boxes in Fulton and DeKalb All 350,000+ original in-person ballot images in Fulton are missing in violation of federal, state retention law All 393,000+ original ballot images in Cobb are missing in violation of federal, state retention law At least 17,720 certified in person recount votes have no ballot images in Fulton 18,325 voters had vacant residential addresses according to U.S. Post Office 904 voters were registered at a P.O. Box address, which is illegal All or large parts of 2,000,000 original ballot images from 70+ Georgia counties are missing Failure to make mandatory check of ballot envelope signature to signature on file resulted in a 2020 absentee ballot rejection rate drop from 3.47% (in 2018) to 0.34%, which translates to the acceptance and inclusion of approximately 4,400 dubious Fulton County mail-in ballots The U.S. District Court found Secretary of State’s office “not credible” on August 16th, 2019 [pg. 70] A report compiled by Matt Braynard and his team at Look Ahead America provided specific, verifiable evidence that likely illegal ballots exceed the margin of victory in the Presidential race Statistical abnormalities identified in many GA counties by former Army Intelligence Captain, Seth Keschel, show that it is implausible that the election are correct

@BehizyTweets - George

WHAT’S WRONG WITH GEORGIA’S NEW VOTING SYSTEM AND PROCEDURES? Did you know? Georgia election results cannot ensure accuracy because the new (Ballot Marking Device System (BMD) voting system will tabulate votes hidden in bar codes the voter cannot read or verify. Georgia counties are not required to audit State Senate, State House, County Commission, Judicial, Non-partisan or Municipal elections and have no plans to do so. Recount accuracy cannot be confirmed because SEB procedures call for a recount to accumulate votes hidden in bar codes and ignore the vote selections that the voter verified. Georgia is attempting to implement Risk Limiting Audits when the inventor of those procedures has already written Georgia officials to explain that the procedures cannot be used to meaningfully audit BMDs. Counties cannot ensure the security of BMD ballots or election files received from the state and nearly all national cybersecurity experts flatly state BMDs are insecure and easily hacked. Georgia has not stopped the high risk practice of having contractors build electronic ballots at home and transfer them through the public internet to an SOS server as explained in U.S. District court testimony. The BMDs produce small paper summaries with only selected candidates and no referendum language despite scientific conclusions they are “unauditable” and “virtually useless for verifying voter intent” Voter privacy cannot be maintained when the new BMD screens are so large and unprotected that voter selections can be seen from across the room 25 feet away. Nothing has been done to mitigate security risks for dozens of unmitigated vulnerabilities in the SOS public server and the voter registration system as identified by Fortalice in U.S. District court testimony. State election officials previously refused to investigate how 120,000 votes were lost in the 2018 Lt. Gov. race and refused to perform a forensic assessment when the state ballot builder server at KSU was found to have long been exposed to the internet in 2017. Taxpayers incurred a 20 year bond to buy the new BMD system that vendors say only has a ten year shelf life. State and counties paying $100 million more over 10 years than Hand Marked Paper Ballot and Ballot on Demand systems that experts contend more verifiable, auditable and secure. Georgia implemented the same Dominion bar coded voting system that the state of Texas rejected and the state of Colorado announced they will ban as of this year. The voting system failed to produce the correct results in all three recounts for the Coffee County 2020 election, forcing election officials to certify the hand count. Georgia’s voting system picked the wrong winners in the May 24, 2022, DeKalb Co. District 2 Commission primary. It was the only race fully audited by a a hand count.

Mary_frostt
Posted - August 17, 2023 at 12:30 PM
Saved - August 17, 2023 at 1:32 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Donald Trump's indictment in Georgia highlights concerns about the 2020 election. The US District Court found Dominion Voting System, used in November, violated Georgia statutes. Sworn affidavits reveal thousands of counterfeit mail-in ballots in Fulton Co. State Farm Arena video shows election law violations. DeKalb Co drop box ballots lack chain of custody forms. Evidence of ballot harvesting teams was found. Missing original ballot images, vacant addresses, and illegal registrations raise further doubts. Statistical abnormalities suggest implausible election accuracy. Serious questions remain.

@Mary_frostt - Mary Frost🇺🇸

Now that Donald Trump has been indicted in Georgia for questioning the results of the 2020 election, I want to remind everyone that it was the most RIGGED election in American history HERE'S PROOF: The U.S. District Court found on Oct 11th, 2020 the Dominion Voting System that was used in the November 2020 election is unverifiable to the voter and in violation of two Georgia statues There are six sworn affidavits of counterfeit mail-in ballots in Fulton Co. election results scaling into the tens of thousands State Farm Arena video shows at least four violations of Georgia election law Approximately 43,000 DeKalb Co. drop box ballots have no chain of custody forms to authenticate them Tru-Vote Geo tracking showed evidence of ballot harvesting teams driving repeatedly to drop boxes in Fulton and DeKalb All 350,000+ original in-person ballot images in Fulton are missing in violation of federal, state retention law All 393,000+ original ballot images in Cobb are missing in violation of federal, state retention law At least 17,720 certified in person recount votes have no ballot images in Fulton 18,325 voters had vacant residential addresses according to U.S. Post Office 904 voters were registered at a P.O. Box address, which is illegal All or large parts of 2,000,000 original ballot images from 70+ Georgia counties are missing Failure to make mandatory check of ballot envelope signature to signature on file resulted in a 2020 absentee ballot rejection rate drop from 3.47% (in 2018) to 0.34%, which translates to the acceptance and inclusion of approximately 4,400 dubious Fulton County mail-in ballots The U.S. District Court found Secretary of State’s office “not credible” on August 16th, 2019 [pg. 70] A report compiled by Matt Braynard and his team at Look Ahead America provided specific, verifiable evidence that likely illegal ballots exceed the margin of victory in the Presidential race Statistical abnormalities identified in many GA counties by former Army Intelligence Captain, Seth Keschel, show that it is implausible that the election are correct

FIENDSQUAD
Posted - September 4, 2023 at 7:37 PM
Saved - September 4, 2023 at 7:59 PM

@FIENDSQUAD - 𝖎𝖒𝖆𝖌𝖎𝖓𝖆𝖗𝖞 𝖋𝖎𝖊𝖓𝖉𝖘 ™

Lots of names named in this article from 2020... Worth checkin out. [https://cbinsights.com/research/report/election-technology-2020/#mail…]

Countdown to 2020 Election & Cyber Defenses: 11 Vulnerability Points & Technologies | CB Insights Research We examine the companies and technologies helping to mitigate threats to the 2020 US presidential election. Find out more. cbinsights.com
yehuda_miller
Posted - September 7, 2023 at 4:54 PM
Saved - September 7, 2023 at 6:49 PM

@yehuda_miller - Yehuda Miller

EXCLUSIVE: "Election Industrial Complex" See the shocking list of names, companies and emails!! Who is actually involved in USA elections??? Everyone from Dominion, Konnech, ERIC, Scytl, Runbeck, Bpro, Smartmatic, EAC, Benson, Ryan Macias, FBI, CISA, USA Military and SO MANY MORE

BerryRazi
Posted - September 7, 2023 at 5:15 PM
Saved - September 7, 2023 at 5:31 PM

@BerryRazi - Phenomenology

LOOK@yehuda_miller uncovered a shocking email list of partners meeting before the election including machine and tabulator companies, governments, big tech, NGOs, and third party vendors.

pafstfrgz
Posted - September 22, 2023 at 9:14 PM
Saved - October 3, 2023 at 10:55 AM

@pafstfrgz - Patriot Arts Farm

TRUMP WON Thread - Smartmatic Smartmatic is a large voting company. They operate all over the world including in the USA Smartmatic has it’s roots in Venezuela The 2004 Venezuelan Election - Hugo Chavez was losing but overnight he made a miraculous comeback

Video Transcript AI Summary
Antonio Mojica and Alfredo Anzola received a small business loan from the Venezuelan government before the recall election. They started a company called Vista, which adapted voting software for Smartmatic machines used in the 2004 elections. The Venezuelan government owned 28% of Vista's stock, and a government minister was on the board of directors. Smartmatic, primarily owned by Venezuelan businessmen, later bought Sequoia, a top US electronic voting system company. Experts believe that Smartmatic manipulated voting machines in Venezuela to give President Hugo Chavez a victory. Smartmatic is based in Florida, but most of its employees are in Venezuela. The use of Smartmatic's machines in the Chicago and Cook County primary elections raised concerns about foreign influence in US elections.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Antonio Mojica and his partner Alfredo Anzola received a small business loan from the Venezuelan government only months before the recall election. These corporate registration documents from Venezuela show the Venezuelan government owned 28% of the stock of another company they started, Vista, which adapted voting software for the Smartmatic machines in the 2004 elections. The same document shows a Chavez government minister, Omar Montillo was on the board of directors. The Chavez government gave Vista, Smartmatic, and another company a $91,000,000 contract to run voting machines for the 2004 election. The next year, the owners of Smartmatic, primarily owned by Venezuelan businessmen, bought Sequoia, one of the top electronic voting system companies in the United States for $16,000,000. Smartmatic is a labyrinth of international holding companies owned by Venezuelan businessmen. Smartmatic Group NV of Curacao Netherlands Antilles owns Smartmatic International BV of Amsterdam Netherlands, owned Smartmatic Corporation of Florida, which bought Sequoia Voting Systems of California USA. When Smartmatic bought the US voting machine companies, US government did not review the sale. The Treasury Department is supposed to monitor sales of US companies to overseas investors where there is a question of national No security, such as in the Dubai ports deal, the so called CFIUS review process. Many experts say those voting machines were manipulated in Venezuela to give president Hugo Chavez a victory. Exit polls done by the US firm, PENSHOWN, in Berlin had Chavez losing 41% to 59%. But the next day, Chavez declared victory, reversing the score, saying he won 59% of the vote. Speaker 1: Everything thing was computed in favor of the government. So, the the the only explanation is that the smart mathematic machines Had been programmed in that way. Speaker 0: A Harvard mathematician crunched the numbers on the Venezuelan election. Speaker 1: It had had to be the smart Machines talk to a central computer and report on their results. And in in that in that mechanism. As they communicate with the center, the central machine can report anything. Speaker 0: Smartmatic is technically based in Boca Raton, Florida, But the president of the company, Jack Blaine, testified to the Chicago City Council, fewer than a dozen Smartmatic employees work in Florida. The majority if the workers are based in Venezuela. Speaker 2: Venezuela, of course, led by Hugo Chavez, working to, change, the, The views of most South American countries moved to the left. Critics of the deal say our nation's very democracy is now for sale Without anyone doing a thing about it. Speaker 0: The use of some 19,000 electronic voting machines in the city of Chicago and Cook County primary on March 21st this year is now under intense scrutiny. The US company that makes the machine, Sequoia, was bought in 2005 by Smartmatic, a private company primarily owned by Venezuelan businessmen. When Chicago had problems with the machines. A dozen Venezuelan employees were there to help with the election. Sequoia We'll again have Venezuelan nationalists as support workers on the electronic machines. That's in Cook County, Illinois. And the workers are project managers from Smartmatic, The Venezuelan company that bought Sequoia, election officials say they have no way of knowing how many Venezuelans We'll be there on election day, but they've seen some around. Watchdog groups question why US voting machines would be under the control
Real_RobN
Posted - October 29, 2023 at 9:23 PM
Saved - October 31, 2023 at 11:48 AM

@Real_RobN - 🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸

“He made sure that Dominion Voting System was in all the battle grounds states for the 2020 election” VP Dominion Voting System, Antifa member Eric Coomer in nuclear physics and treason. “Don’t worry about the election. Trump is not going to win. I made a fucking sure of that.” https://t.co/ebB1oiDQ25

Video Transcript AI Summary
In September 2020, Joe Oldman, founder of FEC United, infiltrated an Antifa conference call and discovered Eric Coomer, a top executive at Dominion Voting Systems. During the call, Coomer expressed confidence that Trump would not win the election. Oldman conducted a Google search on Coomer and found out that he held a high position at Dominion and had a background in nuclear physics. Coomer's Facebook page revealed his anti-Trump sentiments and his involvement in manipulating the election. Coomer had traveled to battleground states in 2019 to ensure that Dominion Voting Systems was implemented there for the 2020 election.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There's a screenshots capturing the disturbing profile of Eric Coom In September 2020, FEC United founder Joe Old man had infiltrated Antifa to uncover journalists who were active members of the Antifa group attacking his company Speaker 1: in Colorado. Joe, you infiltrated an Antifa conference Speaker 0: call this past Prado. Joe, you infiltrated an Antifa conference call this past September and accidentally came upon a top Dominion Voting Systems executive named Eric Coomer. Describe that call and what it led you to find. Speaker 1: It was interesting how the how the call started. If someone says, who's Eric? He says, Eric's the Dominion guy. Someone actually said, Yeah. Hey. Go ahead. Joe told him to continue speaking. And someone interrupts and says, what are we gonna do if effing Trump wins? And Eric responds, and I'm paraphrasing this, by the way. Don't worry about the election. Trump is not gonna win. I made effing sure of that. And then they started laughing and somebody says effing right. And so I just put it a simple Google search to start, which was Eric Dominion, Denver, Colorado. And Eric Coomer came up immediately under Dominion Voting Speaker 0: Systems. Turns out Eric Coomer held a top position at Dominion. With a PhD in nuclear physics, Coomer joined Dominion as vice president of engineering and hold several patents with Dominion ensuring users can adjudicate ballots from the machines. The very function Ron Watkins pointed out as a huge red flag. After the election, Altman was sent an article highlighting Eric Coomer from Dominion. Old man started looking into Eric again. Eric was the director of strategy and security at Dominion and a shareholder in the company. Speaker 1: When I got into his Facebook page, that's when things really started to kind of come together for me that, You know that Eric Coomer was this you know, that he he was not just Antifa. He was, he was responsible for putting his finger on the The, scales of our election. Speaker 0: And Dominion seemed to be a friendly place for such anti Trump sentiment. Kumar goes on to travel traveled to battleground states all of 2019. Speaker 1: Whatever they were building too coming into the 2020 election that he made sure it happened. He made sure that, the Dominion Voting Systems was in all the battleground states, for the 2020
listen_2learn
Posted - December 11, 2023 at 1:34 AM
Saved - December 11, 2023 at 10:50 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Election-management systems, crucial but often overlooked, reside in county election offices. They hold software used to program voting machines and tabulate final results. These systems play a vital role in ensuring accurate and efficient elections. For more details, check the full article.

@listen_2learn - The Researcher

“Election-management systems are not the voting terminals that voters use to cast their ballots, but are just as critical: they sit in county election offices and contain software that in some counties is used to program all the voting machines used in the county; the systems also tabulate final results aggregated from voting machines.”

@listen_2learn - The Researcher

@listen_2learn - The Researcher

@listen_2learn - The Researcher

@listen_2learn - The Researcher

@listen_2learn - The Researcher

@listen_2learn - The Researcher

Link to full article. https://www.survivethenews.com/exclusive-critical-u-s-election-systems-have-been-left-exposed-online-despite-official-denials/

Exclusive: Critical U.S. Election Systems Have Been Left Exposed Online Despite Official Denials – Survive the News survivethenews.com
MJTruthUltra
Posted - March 7, 2024 at 8:24 PM
Saved - March 8, 2024 at 6:34 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The 2020 election was allegedly rigged according to a series of posts. Various states, including Michigan, Arizona, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, and Georgia, are mentioned as having evidence of election fraud. Issues such as ballot tampering, uncounted votes, duplicate ballots, and errors in the election process are highlighted. There are also claims of Chinese interference, manipulation by tech companies like Google, and the involvement of foreign entities in the election. The posts emphasize the need for election reform and express concerns about the integrity of the electoral system.

@MJTruthUltra - MJTruthUltra

MASTER THREAD 🧵 THE 2020 ELECTION The most “secure” election in history I literally have thousands of clips and data point proving the election was rigged. But I will try my best to consolidate as much information as I can, showing how they are rigging elections. START HERE: •The entire election was decided by 4 extreme updates, which statistically hold a probability rate of less than 0.1% of happening…. Which basically means it’s damn near impossible what happened. •Cyber Security experts identified higher than normal errors rates in various states; the highest being 68.05%. ◦The Federal Election Commission guidelines state than an error rate of 0.008% is an indicator of fraud. Again, the highest error rate found was 68.05%. •No sitting President in 132 years has ever gained votes between his first & second race & lost re-election. Trump gained at the very least 11 million more votes in 2020 then he did in 2016. •During the California count, the data showed that a singular vote was not counted for one person. ◦In fact, a singular vote was fractionalized and divided up at a rate of approximately 66% for Biden, 32% for Trump, & 1-2% for other candidates. Here are JUST A FEW other data points to look at: •MICHIGAN ◦Antrim Michigan, during the forensic report of the audit of Dominion Voting System tabulator machine software, it was discovered that someone had attempted to zero out all election results at 13:53:09 on Nov 21st. This is a clear & unchallenged example of direct tampering with evidence. ◦The most extreme “update” came on Nov 4, at 6:30AM ET, where there was a ballot dump of 41,258 votes for Biden & Trump only got 5,968 votes. That is where this image below you’ve probably seen on social media came from. •On Election Night, November 3rd, 2020, Donald Trump had a 293,052 vote LEAD over Joe Biden. 42 days later, by December 15, Joe Biden had a 154,188 vote “Lead” after a massive amount of fraudulent “mail-in” ballots flooded in. •ARIZONA ◦AZ had 2,000 voters who were “registered” to a vacant lot ◦22,093 “mail-in” ballots were “received” the day before they were mailed. How does that happen? ◦The Maricopa County AZ Hearing, available on Rumble, if anything, should be all you need to hear regarding election fraud. All videos of the hearing have been scrubbed from Youtube. Trump “lost” Arizona by a little more than 10,000 votes. Within the first 20 minutes of this hearing, you will hear that there were over 17,000 DUPLICATE ballots found during the forensic audits, in this one county alone; not to mention hundreds of thousands of ballots in question on the IT router/data side which is described later in the hearing. It is undeniable. •WISCONSIN ◦On Election Night, November 3rd, 2020, Donald Trump had a 112,022 vote LEAD over Joe Biden. 42 days later, by December 15, Joe Biden had a 20,682 “Lead” after a massive amount of fraudulent “mail-in” ballots flooded in. •PENNSYLVANIA ◦On Election Night, November 3rd, 2020, Donald Trump had a 555,189 vote LEAD over Joe Biden. 42 days later, by December 15, Joe Biden had a 81,660 vote “Lead” after a massive amount of fraudulent “mail-in” ballots flooded in.

@MJTruthUltra - MJTruthUltra

•GEORGIA ◦In GA, after the “recount”, which was essentially counting the same fraudulent ballots & was not a forensic audit (big difference), the original numbers were used to certify the results. ◦Thousands of citizens filed affidavits under oath, (under penalty of perjury) asserting irregular & illegal activities in voting places. ◦A GA polling manager testified that stacks of hundreds of “mail in” ballots that were tallied, were on perfectly flat “pristine” paper that had never been folded. (If a ballot is really mailed, it has to be folded in two places to fit in the envelope). ◦Georgia’s Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, without ;legislative approval, unilaterally abrogated Georgia’s statute governing the signature verification process for absentee ballots. ◦On Election Night, November 3rd, 2020, Donald Trump had a 356,945 vote LEAD over Joe Biden. 42 days later, by December 15, Joe Biden had a 11,779 vote “Lead” after a massive amount of fraudulent “mail-in” ballots flooded in. Again, these were ONLY A FEW data points of what amounts to an unimaginable amount of Election Fraud. Another red flag found i n the data sets of the 2020 election, indicated IMPOSSIBLE identical ratios of votes from Biden to Trump over the course of many days. Nothing to see here. The identical numbers indicate that a computer algorithm was used & it occurred in MANY states. This process is called “Weighted Race Distribution”, which is a KNOWN feature of “Diebold Voting Machines”, which assigns a value to a vote that can favor one candidate over another. As described above, (Biden 66%, Trump 33%, Other 1%). The interesting thing is that Diebold has a eyebrow raising history where (you guessed it) & it was never disputed, that Diebold software was found to switch votes in past elections, as early as 2001. But Diebold had nothing to do with the 2020 election, right? WRONG! Dominion acquired ES&S in 2010. ES&S acquired Diebold under its new name, “Premiere Election Solutions“. It’s a shell game. Follow the money & you will see they are one big happy election stealing family. It is undeniable. The evidence is overwhelming. They stole the 2020 Presidential Election. Let’s Continue 👇👇👇👇

@MJTruthUltra - MJTruthUltra

🚨 There is a Massive Mistake in the Census Bureau Every American Should Know About In 2020, the U.S. Census Bureau came out and they admitted that during the most recent census, they miscounted the populations in 14 different states. https://rumble.com/v4b5b6c-the-u.s.-census-bureau-admitted-the-recent-census-miscounted-the-population.html Notably, they undercounted the populations in six states, while simultaneously overcounting the populations in eight other states. And when you dig into this specifics of their mistake, there are massive implications not only for this year's election, not only for the general makeup of Congress, not only for the next presidential race, but rather to our entire electoral system for the next 10 years. Republican-leaning states have been shortchanged at least three congressional seats and Electoral College votes because their populations were undercounted in the 2020 census. Democrat-leaning states received at least one extra seat and vote because of census overcounts and kept at least two that they should have lost, according to an analysis of the Census Bureau’s post-census survey. For comparison, no state saw a significant error in the 2000 and 2010 censuses. The bureau acknowledged the errors but stated that there’s no way to correct them until the next census in 2030.

The U.S. Census Bureau admitted the recent census miscounted the populations in 14 different states. Tip/Donating (everything I do is free, so any tips are appreciated) https://www.givesendgo.com/theunshakeablepundit Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Oper rumble.com

@MJTruthUltra - MJTruthUltra

Democrat Dr. Robert Epstein says Google Alone Shifted 6+ Million Votes to Joe Biden in the 2020 Presidential Election https://rumble.com/v3uz83a-google-alone-shifted-6-million-votes-to-joe-biden-in-the-2020-presidential-.html “Google alone shifted more than 6 million votes to Joe Biden.” Now, by the way, I supported Hillary Clinton. I supported Joe Biden. I lean left myself. So I should be thrilled, but I'm not thrilled because I don't like the fact that a private company is undermining democracy and getting away with it. And there's no restrictions on them whatsoever. Absolutely none….> If you factor out Google, Trump would have won 11 of those 13 swing states, except maybe New York and California.” Another Example of Googles Election Interference: Florida in 2022 on election day, November 8th, all day long, 100% of Democrats in Florida were receiving those reminders all day. While only 59% of conservatives received the same reminders. WE NEED TO REVISE SECTION 230

Democrat Dr. Robert Epstein - Google Alone Shifted 6+ Million Votes to Joe Biden in the 2020 Presidential Election Tip/Donating (everything I do is free, so any tips are appreciated) https://www.givesendgo.com/theunshakeablepundit Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Oper rumble.com

@MJTruthUltra - MJTruthUltra

Clinton Eugene Curtis: Testimony on How Elections Have Been Stolen Using Algorithms Since at Least 2000 https://rumble.com/v4hq9to-clinton-eugene-curtis-testimony-on-how-elections-are-rigged-with-algorithms.html 2004 Testimony from Clinton Eugene Curtis, an American attorney, computer programmer and ex-NASA employee (Speaker of the House of Florida at the time), admits that elections can indeed be fixed & it would go undetectable. In the video, Curtis testifies under oath that he rigged computer election results for then Congressman Tom Feeney, the former Speaker of the Florida House of Representatives. Time Stamps: - 00:25 Are there programs that can secretly be used to fix elections? Yes. October, 2000, Tom Feeney Former Speaker of the Florida House of Representatives asked me to do it. It would flip the vote 51-49 to whoever you wanted it to go to. 1:12 How could a secret program be detected? Source Code, receipt & count hard paper against the vote total. If not, you won’t see it. 4:50 “You don’t understand, we need to hide the fraud in the source code, not reveal the fraud, to control the vote in South Florida”. 7:45 Central tabulators can flip votes. A person with bad code can affect thousands & thousands of votes. A recount will not reveal the fraud between a central tabulator & a tampered machine. The tabulators can tell the machines to switch the results when they are networked together.

Clinton Eugene Curtis - Testimony on How Elections are Rigged with Algorithms Tip/Donating (everything I do is free, so any tips are appreciated) https://www.givesendgo.com/theunshakeablepundit Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Oper rumble.com

@MJTruthUltra - MJTruthUltra

Federal Agencies Interfered in the Election Mark Zuckerberg: Says The FBI Asked Facebook to Censor The Hunter Biden Laptop Before the US Presidential Election https://rumble.com/v1hclxv-mark-zuckerberg-says-the-fbi-asked-facebook-to-censor-the-hunter-biden-lapt.html A large majority of voters say that if they knew the Hunter Biden laptop story was real, they never would have voted for Biden. They surprised this story so it would not hurt Joe Biden. Let’s not forget about those who Organized the 51 Intelligence Letter Saying Hunter Bidens Laptop was Russian Disinformation “John, Can I add your name to this list? Will be adding Leon, Sue Gordon, Jeb Johnson, George, Lisa Monaco, and Mike Rogers DIRNAS today…” John Brennons Reply: “Ok, Michael, add my name to the list. Good Initiative. Thanks for asking me to sign.” https://rumble.com/v2m2p20-mike-morell-who-organized-the-51-intelligence-letter-asked-john-brennan-to-.html There was also evidence of Government Interference released in multiple Twitter Files Drops The FBI Rigged the 2020 Election’ “This election was decided by 44,000 votes in Georgia, Arizona, and Wisconsin. If we, the people, hadn’t been lied to, Trump would have won. This was not a free and fair election. The FBI rigged the 2020 election.” https://rumble.com/v1hquqq-jesse-watters-the-fbi-rigged-the-2020-presidential-election.html

Mark Zuckerberg: Says The FBI Asked Facebook to Censor The Hunter Biden Laptop Before the US Presidential Election VIDEO: Mark Zuckerberg tells Joe Rogan the FBI came to them and asked them to censor the Hunter Biden laptop story right before the 2020 U.S. Presidential election Truth Seeker in my Spare Time Telegr rumble.com
Mike Morell - Who Organized the 51 Intelligence Letter Saying Hunter Bidens Laptop was Russian Disinformation Asked John Brennan to Sign Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci rumble.com
Jesse Watters: The FBI Rigged the 2020 Presidential Election Jesse Watters: The FBI Rigged the 2020 Presidential Election Truth Seeker in my Spare Time Telegram is my home base of Operations— follow me at t.me/candlesinthenight Truth Social at @MJTruth Gab http rumble.com

@MJTruthUltra - MJTruthUltra

2020 Election Edison Data Shows Major Fluctuations in Vote Counts - It’s an Algorithm! https://rumble.com/v38j5to-the-2020-edison-data-for-the-elections-shows-major-fluctuations-in-vote-cou.html Scytl recieved the election raw data directly from election officials in at least 9 states. Elections are an additive process. Each raw data interval of reported votes should be an additive process, and you’d shouldn’t see any deletions. The real-time Edison reports over an elapsed time period paused, oscillated, and deleted votes. This is an algorithm trying to figure out the mathematical problem that is YOU. Projection: • Sometimes they’ll admit to you what they’re showing you on TV isn’t real. Eg estimated votes going from 99% back down to 95% — This is an algorithm trying to figure out the mathematical problem that is YOU.

The 2020 Edison Data for the Elections Shows Major Fluctuations in Vote Counts - It’s an Algorithm! Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci rumble.com

@MJTruthUltra - MJTruthUltra

America is in the middle of a full blown coup d'é·tatz Nov 2020– Former Members of the US Intel, DoD, NASA, US National Labatories, Cyber Security firms, and legal firms around the country all came together to investigate election anomalies. https://rumble.com/v45f3sb-mike-lindell-cyber-symposium-col.-phil-waldron-your-wake-up-call.html THE ENTIRE US ELECTION SYSTEM is under the total control of private equity firms and foreign money… 🟣 UBS Securities LLC New York & UBS Securities Co. limited, Beijing, injected hundreds of Millions of dollars into Staple Street Capital, the owner of Dominion Voting • UBS holds the intellectual property of Dominion as their equity collateral • Up until Dec 2020, UBS Securities LLC New York listed three senior Communist Chinese Party members as being on the boards of both UBS Securities LLC New York & UBS Securities Co. limited, Beijing. — The companies are owned 75% by the Chinese Government 🟣 Scytl- the parent company of Clarity Elections located in Spain.. went bankrupt in May of 2020, and was subsequently purchased in a closed private equity deal by an Irish Company called, Paragon. • The Election Sites for numerous counties in the US go to a Clarity Elections web address. — The President, Secretary, Treasurer, and CEO are all occupied by one man, Jonathan Brill. • Johnathan happens to be part of Scytl Senior Management team, and has run campaigns for Democrat party candidates. 🟣 The Election Systems and their equipment can be connected, hacked, and manipulated. • The 2018 Kentucky Gov race, showed an exact vote flip of 560 votes that went from (R) Matt Bevin to (D) Andy Beshear. • An Election Supervisor could scan ballots multiple times, and through the adjudication process, could vote for someone who did not vote. • Initiated by a court order, a Michigan Investigation team gained access to a DS200 tabulator, the machine that counts the votes. — A 4G wireless Chip was discovered embedded into the motherboard. — The Voting Machine tapes showed modem engagement and election data. 🟣 THE 2020 ELECTION: Five Key States ALL Stopped Counting at a Certain Time. • When counting resumed, Joe Biden was the recipient of a massive spike in votes. 🟣 Over 200 non-profits received substantial funding from a single source; George Soros. • George Soros’s Open Society Foundation wrote a white-paper entitled “U.S. Programs 2015-2018 Strategy” which began funding radical operations in Arizona & Georgia in 2015, with the goal of subverting the 2020 election. • Through massive campaign contributions and non-profit funding, George Soros owns and controls… - countless public officials - university professors - teachers unions - mayors - district attorneys - judges - congressmen - senators - secretaries of state - sheriffs - governors - and electronic voting machine companies around the world • In 2010, George Soros declared China had a better functioning government of the United States 🟣 THE CCP has Been Plotting to take over the United States Over Half a Century • Their unconventional warfare principals are barely recognizable to the US Population • The Chinese gov and their operative’s have been buying up the United States at an alarming rate… - American Farms & Businesses - Chinese firms own several major US Entertainment Industries, and own more than 8,000 American Theaters - Many sports teams and players are control by the CCP • Joe Biden, as VP, took billions of dollars in bribes from the Chinese Government in the form of payments to Hunter Bidens Businesses. • China is trying to gain Control of US Port facility Operations and already own the Panamal Canal. • China is building 5G networks throughout Europe and the West to steal sensitive data • 97% of antibiotics come from China • 80% of US Imports of rare earth minerals come from China • 97% of Fentanyl is smuggled into the US from China China’s stated goal is to own America by 2035… This is our wake up call! ☎️

Mike Lindell Cyber Symposium - Col. Phil Waldron "Your Wake Up Call" Tip/Donating (everything I do is free, so any tips are appreciated) https://www.givesendgo.com/theunshakeablepundit Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Oper rumble.com

@MJTruthUltra - MJTruthUltra

Mail-In Ballots & Zuckerbucks Election Fraud Report https://rumble.com/v457fr6-donald-trump-rigged-and-stolen-election-mail-in-ballots-and-zuckerbucks.html Just a few highlights: Legal Foundation of Public Interest: “83K MAIL TICKETS MISSING OR NOT DELIVERABLE IN THE MIDDLE OF 20K VOTES MARGIN OF VICTORY IN WI 2020 PRESIDENTIAL: Unlike other states, its size with an influence on national politics, Wisconsin could boast of the fact that its counts of undeliverable and “unknown” mail-in ballots never flooded the margin of victory of a candidate throughout the state, until the 2020 elections...  Legal Foundation of Public Interest: “The Milwaukee District Attorney rejected 354 references for possible illegal votes since 2020: When registered voters on the same day are suspected of fraud, the votes still count” ... During the 2020 general elections, more than 178,000 inhabitants of Wisconsin used the registry on the same day and almost 5,400 of those voter addresses did not approve the initial audits. Throughout the state, 359 references were generated for district prosecutors. Milwaukee County accounted for 355 of those references. ... The record on the same day in Milwaukee during the 2020 presidential elections generated 21,083 new polls. Of these, 1,247 provided addresses that would later not pass to the initial mail tests as undeliverable. Ultimately, 349 of those voters were inactivated and reserved for referral by the district attorney.  Legal Foundation of Public Interest: “2020: Biden won Georgia for 11K Votes. 27,000 mail ballots bounced from bad addresses: another 217,000 mail ballots are not counted” ... In 2020, the State of Peach broke records of non-deliverable and unaccounted mail ballots... One of the most important stories that has come out of Georgia is how the number of mail-in ballots addressed to defective addresses (undeliverable returns) was greater than the final difference between winning and losing 16 votes of the Electoral College  Legal Foundation of Public Interest: “440,000 Ballots Disappeared by Mail Or it can’t be delivered in the middle of a victory margin of 81K votes in the PA 2020 presidential election” By the fall of 2020, $8 million in Mark Zuckerberg funds were used through the Center for Technology and Civic Life (CTCL) in Pennsylvania counties, financing the expansions of the mail-in voting... Now, Pennsylvania joins several other states on the battlefield for losing the notion of more ballots than the difference between winning and losing their votes in the Electoral College. In spite of the governor. Tom Wolf’s promise during the signing of Law 77 that he would help reduce rejected ballots (in addition to the Zuckbucks later to help guarantee so much), the 2020 General Election set a new record for Pennsylvania Legal Foundation of Public Interest: “Arizona: Tens of thousands of duplicate voter records found after the 2020 elections” PILF data show that 31,641 Arizona registrants moved long before the 30-day window that led to the elections and managed to secure a second registration outside the state. Some former inhabitants of Arizona had left a long time ago before November 2020. In one case, a person moved from Tempe to Virginia in 2017 and was actively registered in both states during the last elections... Watch the Video if you’d like to know more

Donald Trump - Rigged & Stolen Election: Mail-In Ballots and Zuckerbucks Tip/Donating (everything I do is free, so any tips are appreciated) https://www.givesendgo.com/theunshakeablepundit Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Oper rumble.com

@MJTruthUltra - MJTruthUltra

THE COUP DE'TAT OF AMERICA - Italian & US Intelligence Testimony that the 2020 U.S. Election was stolen from President Donald Trump https://rumble.com/v3usauj-italian-and-us-intelligence-testimony-the-2020-u.s.-election-was-stolen-fro.html “Something has happened, we’re watching a coup d’état in the United States of America.” • China is buying up politicians around the world, buying up property and in some instances, entire countries. • In Italy, Leonardo, a defense contracting firm had strange people come and go from Frankfurt into the Italian US Embassy. According to Italian Intelligence, they were at Leonardo to change the results of the 2020 election Presidential Election. This was a calculated attempt to take down presidencies and control entire countries. • A hand delivered letter that described how the election was stolen was delivered to Donald Trump on Christmas Eve in 2020 • Arturo D’Elia was willing to testify. Larry Johnson, CIA & State Department head, in an audio recording, reveals there was an operation to rescue Arturo— But it never happened and it was buried. • John Durham is in possession of documents relating to Barrack Obama moving $400 Million in Pallets of Cash to the Dubai Embassy into the Merrill Lynch Bank in Geneva Switzerland. • Following the Coup, 5 Italian Government officials, including an ambassador, was murdered • This Coincides with .@MarcoPolo501c3 report on the CCP using the Italian defense contractor Leonardo SpA to steal US aerospace technology (https://media.marcopolousa.org/pdf/MP_Rat_King_Report_7_10_21_1700.pdf) Leonardo SpA was in business with the same UBS Securities that infused $400 million into Staple Street Capital, the owner of Dominion Voting Systems, just weeks before the 2020 presidential election • This coincides with the Supreme Court of Italy legal counsel testifying under oath about interference in 2020 election https://rumble.com/v3usaek-supreme-court-of-italy-legal-counsel-testifying-under-oath-about-interferen.html • This coincides with General Thomas McInerney speaking about Leonardo and was Foreign Election Interference, Hammer & Scorecard, Italy Changing Votes https://rumble.com/v381m67-general-mcinerney-flashback-2021-foreign-countries-involved-in-elections-ha.html

THE COUP DE'TAT OF AMERICA - Italian & US Intelligence Testimony the 2020 U.S. Election was stolen from President Trump Tip/Donating (everything I do is free, so any tips are appreciated) https://www.givesendgo.com/theunshakeablepundit Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Oper rumble.com
Supreme Court of Italy legal counsel testifying under oath about interference in 2020 election Tip/Donating (everything I do is free, so any tips are appreciated) https://www.givesendgo.com/theunshakeablepundit Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Oper rumble.com
General McInerney - Flashback 2021! Foreign Countries Involved in Elections, Hammer & Scorecard, etc Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci rumble.com

@MJTruthUltra - MJTruthUltra

Chinese “GodMode” Access into US Elections - The Konnech Story - The Pit & the Corrupt FBI https://rumble.com/v38nrbg-china-infiltration-in-us-elections-the-konnech-story-the-pit-and-a-corrupt-.html Konnech Inc: • Provides back office infrastructure systems for election departments throughout the country, including other countries • Founded by Eugene Yu, a Chinese National True the Vote: • Through confidential informants, Catherine Engelbrecht & Gregg Phillips discovered huge amounts of data on a Chinese Server: — Election Workers — Personal Identifying information — Infrastructure, machine ID’s & other components 1-1/2 years after working with the Detroit office of the FBI, nothing happened with this information related to national security. Instead, Washington tried to shut them down. Two DoJ attorneys shut down the investigation & threatened T2V. The Pitt: • An Assistant District Attorney from Las Angeles was at this event. — He initiated Grand Jury Proceedings, which led to the arrest of Eugene Yu • One Week later, Las Angeles District Attorney, George Gascón, dropped all charges against Eugene Yu. The Indictment of Eugene Yu: • On or between October 10, 2019 & October 4, 2022, Eugene Yu & Other employees at Konnech Inc. were providing services to Las Angeles county using third party contractors, based in China • A search warrant executed on October 4, 2022 discovered Konnech employees were sent personal identifying information of Las Angeles County Election Workers to a third-party software developer, who assisted & created Konnechs internal PollChief Software. Konnech Inc PollChief Software: • Pollcheif controls voter registration, poll books, and how you operate • Back-office infrastructure- which if accessed, can manipulate numbers, Ie.. a backdoor that is undetectable • Any employee working for Chinese contractors in PollChief software had Super Administration privileges. In a nutshell, the Chinese had undetectable “GodMode” backdoor Access into US Elections.

Chinese “GodMode” Access into US Elections - The Konnech Story - The Pit & the Corrupt FBI Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci rumble.com

@MJTruthUltra - MJTruthUltra

DARK MONEY DONORS AND ACTBLUE ⚫️ 60% of ActBlue Donations Are Coming From China - Amalgamated Bank & Divvy Involved Too - FEC Lawsuit Pending https://rumble.com/v2wp1rk-bombshell-60-of-actblue-donations-are-coming-from-china-fec-lawsuit-pending.html ActBlue feeds money to other PACS, such as Emily’s List, Color of Change etc… There’s also receipts of large amounts of monies on the FEC website to financial processors like Amalgamated Bank, particularly the Washington DC branch of Amalgamated Bank, one of these institutions making many of these transactions. ⚫️ HERE are Numerous Examples of what appears to be money laundered through ActBlue, many of which are through the home addresses of ELDERLY people. • North Carolina - ActBlue Donation Apparent Money Laundering Through Senior Citizens- $26,000 & $12,000 https://rumble.com/v2wuik0-north-carolina-more-actblue-donation-money-laundering-26000-and-12000.html • New Orleans, LA - $29,000 in Fraudulent ActBlue Donation Irregularities https://rumble.com/v2sjfka-new-orleans-la-29000-in-actblue-donation-irregularities.html • New Jersey - More ActBlue Donation Irregularities- $86,000+ $30,000+ $200,000+ from Senior Citizens https://rumble.com/v2rok7m-new-jersey-actblue-donation-irregularities-86000-using-poor-old-ladys-name.html • Franklin Tennessee - ActBlue Donation Irregularities- Senior Citizen Says She Did Not Donate $17,000 A resident in Franklin, TN (near Nashville), said she DID NOT donate 2,182 counts in the amount of $17,092.82 to ActBlue between the years 2018-2022. 2020: 205 counts = $3,071.90 2021: 1,103 counts = $7,997.00 2022: 865 counts = $5,863.92 https://rumble.com/v2pbgyc-franklin-tennessee-actblue-donation-irregularities-senior-citizens-did-not-.html • Atlanta Georgia - More ActBlue Donations (money laundering) Elderly People Have No Clue Their Using Their Names & Addresses From 2020-2022, an elderly woman “donated 1,113 times… many micro transactions… 2012-2022, elderly woman supposedly “donated” 2,173 times, equaling $9,737.61 https://rumble.com/v2pbcza-atlanta-georgia-more-actblue-election-irregularities-on-elderly-people.html • Brooklyn New York - Massive Election Donation Irregularities from ActBlue One Resident- Donated 186 times, $3,000 given multiple times a day One Resident- Donated 1,640 times over a two year period, meaning this person donated 2.25 times per day, every day, for two years straight, totaling $14,200. One Resident- Donated 1,479 times over a two year period, meaning this person donated 2 times per day, every day, for two years straight, totaling $47,000. One Resident- Donated up to 52 single donations a day over a two year period, ranging from .60 cents $738 dollars each time, totaling $89,000. https://rumble.com/v2mwbdm-brooklyn-new-york-massive-election-donation-irregularities-from-actblue.html • Schertz Texas $30,000+ Election Donation Irregularities to WinRed 3,109 Donations, totaling $30,325.67 in the year 2022. By year since 2019… 2019: 1 count = $35 2020: 91 counts = $2,279 2021: 313 counts = $5,395.18 2022: 3,109 counts = $30,325.67 TOTAL to WinRed = $38,034.85. The daughter whose been taking care of her father for 5 years says he’s never made these donations. The 2022 donations means her elderly father would have had to make eight donations of $9.75 per day, every day, all year. https://rumble.com/v2k1nha-schertz-texas-30k-election-donation-irregularities-to-winred.html • Texas OMG Texas Donation Irregularities - 11,000 Donations & $68,000 Over a Two Year Period Through ActBlue That means, this person had to have donated approximately $2,833.00 every single month, or roughly $94.00 per day, everyday, for two years straight. https://rumble.com/v2hlovk-texas-donation-irregularities-11000-donations-and-68000-over-a-two-year-per.html • Texas resident made 10,000+ different donations to the Democratic Party from 2020-2022 worth over $106,304.45 to ActBlue. The resident mentioned that he has not used ActBlue The same resident made $12,848.50 from 2009-2019. https://rumble.com/v2gpv3w-bombshell-texas-actblue-fec-data-shows-one-resident-donated-10000-times-mon.html Massive Election Donation Irregularities From FEC Top Donor- Money Laundering of $154,000 into WinRed https://rumble.com/v2k1nha-schertz-texas-30k-election-donation-irregularities-to-winred.html

BOMBSHELL! 60% of ActBlue Donations Are Coming From China - Amalgamated Bank & Pivvy Involved Too - FEC Lawsuit Pending Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci rumble.com
North Carolina - More ActBlue Donation Money Laundering - $26,000 & $12,000 Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci rumble.com
New Orleans, LA - $29,000 in ActBlue Donation Irregularities Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci rumble.com
New Jersey March 5, 2023 - More ActBlue Donation Irregularities- $86,000+ $30,000+ $200,000+ from Senior Citizens Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci rumble.com
Franklin Tennessee - More ActBlue Donation Irregularities- Senior Citizens Did Not Donate $17,000 Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci rumble.com
Atlanta Georgia - More ActBlue Donations Elderly People Have No Clue About Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci rumble.com
Brooklyn New York - Massive Election Donation Irregularities from ActBlue Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci rumble.com
Schertz Texas - $30k Election Donation Irregularities to WinRed Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci rumble.com
Texas Donation Irregularities - 11,000 Donations & $68,000 Over a Two Year Period Through ActBlue Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci rumble.com
BOMBSHELL Texas - ActBlue FEC Data Shows One Resident Donated 10,000 Times - Money Laundering Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci rumble.com
Schertz Texas - $30k Election Donation Irregularities to WinRed Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci rumble.com

@MJTruthUltra - MJTruthUltra

STATE BY STATE ELECTION MANIPULATION ⚫️ ARIZONA • Arizona Never Before Seen Evidence From the Arizona Election Theft— Amazing Report https://rumble.com/v4htuj2-the-arizona-mail-in-ballot-scam-that-stole-the-2020-election.html • 2022 Midterm Election Major Anomalies— a Montage of Voters Detailing the issues they had https://rumble.com/v1udjlg-arizona-midterm-election-was-rigged-hear-it-from-the-people-who-voted.html • Maricopa County, Arizona: MAJOR TABULATOR ISSUES “75% SUCCESS RATE” November 8, 2022 https://rumble.com/v1sk9am-maricopa-county-arizona-major-tabulator-issues-75-success-rate-november-8-2.html • Arizona Ballot Traffickers Caught on Camera Forging Ballots! Former Mayors & School Board Members Involved! https://rumble.com/v1ab0mb-arizona-ballot-traffickers-caught-on-camera-forging-ballots-former-mayors-i.html • Whistleblowers Expose Arizona’s Ballot Trafficking ‘Mafia,’ Implicates GOP Was Highly Involved https://rumble.com/v11grev-whistleblowers-expose-arizonas-ballot-trafficking-mafia-implicates-gop-was-.html • Email leaks reveal Arizona Secretary of State Katie Hobbs was in regular communication with Twitter telling them who to censor. This information comes from the Missouri v Biden case. https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/63290154/71/8/missouri-v-biden/ • Jacqueline Breger Arizona Committee Testimony Bombshell! Computer database had been designed with various back doors allowing outsiders to infiltrate & to change the data.” https://rumble.com/v2au3au-jacqueline-breger-testimony-25000-ballots-and-cash-at-a-private-residence-i.html • AZ Director of Elections Admits They performed Signature verification in Private Offices From Home With No Observers https://rumble.com/v2oe14y-director-of-elections-admits-they-performed-signature-verification-in-priva.html • Arizona, Maricopa County On October 14th, 17th & 18th, Maricopa County performed secret testing on the tabulators This was AFTER the legally required Logic & Accuracy test 260 of 446 tabulators failed They were used on election day anyway. Where 59% failed https://rumble.com/v2qxrfw-arizona-maricopa-county-secret-testing-on-tabulators-after-legally-required.html • Maricopa County Officials Not Aware they were Being Recorded, Broke into Machines After Being Tested & Sealed https://rumble.com/v2qxqz6-arizona-maricopa-county-officials-broke-into-machines-after-being-tested-an.html ⚫️CALIFORNIA • Steve Garvey was leading Adam Schiff with 1.8 million votes. And just like that, it was cut in half. https://rumble.com/v4hoi1f-the-california-glitch-switch-they-robbed-steve-garvey-march-5-2024.html ⚫️ CONNECTICUT • Town Clerk Caught on Video Dumping Illegal Absentee Ballots Into a Drop Box Multiple Times in Recent Mayoral Election https://rumble.com/v3iq9ma-connecticut-town-clerk-dumping-multiple-illegal-absentee-ballots-into-a-dro.html • Bridgeport, Connecticut They Redid their Mayoral Election because of Fraud, and Now There’s Fraud AGAIN! https://rumble.com/v498t40-bridgeport-connecticut-redid-their-election-because-of-fraud-and-they-had-f.html ⚫️ GEORGIA • Gwinnett County, Georgia: A Ballot Trafficking Mule Stuffs the Ballot Box! https://rumble.com/v10mgxa-gwinnett-county-georgia-a-ballot-trafficking-mule-stuffs-the-ballot-box.html Gwinnett County, Georgia: Ballot Trafficking Mule STUFFS Ballot Box In BROAD DAYLIGHT! https://rumble.com/v10mgnu-gwinnett-county-georgia-woman-stuffs-ballot-box-i.-broad-daylight.html • Fulton County, Georgia: This Woman Wore Gloves For Her Ballot Drop Offs! https://rumble.com/v10ng9b-fulton-county-georgia-this-woman-wore-gloves-for-her-ballot-drop-offs.html • Fulton County, Georgia: All Closing Tapes For Early In-Person Ballots Are Unsigned https://rumble.com/vwsce5-fulton-county-georgia-all-closing-tapes-for-early-in-person-ballots-are-uns.html • Fulton County, Georgia: 16,034 Ballot Images Were Added DAYS AFTER the Ballots Were Scanned https://rumble.com/vwry0p-fulton-county-georgia-16034-ballot-images-were-added-days-after-the-ballots.html • Full Hearing: SOS Raffensperger Facilitated Ballot Harvesting in Georgia! The Truth about the Georgia Elections https://rumble.com/vuizgw-sos-raffensperger-facilitated-ballot-harvesting-in-georgia-the-truth-about-.html • First Video of Alleged Ballot Trafficker in Georgia Is Released https://rumble.com/vtnx20-january-30-2022.html • VoterGA released proof of Herschel Walker’s 20,000 vote loss that happened at 10pm on election night, November 8. VoterGA Press Release https://voterga.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Press-Release-VoterGA-Releases-More-Evidence-of-Herschel-Walker-20K-Vote-Decrease.pdf Affidavit 1 https://voterga.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/GIna-Stone-Affidavit-2022-Midterms.png Affidavit 2 https://voterga.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Janet-Martz-Affidavit.png • Fulton County, Georgia: 374,128 In-Person Ballot Images Are Missing https://rumble.com/vwr68d-fulton-county-georgia-374128-in-person-ballot-images-are-missing.html • Fulton County, Georgia: Over 4,000 Ballots Were All Scanned at the Exact Same Time https://rumble.com/vwr6ip-fulton-county-georgia-over-4000-ballots-were-all-scanned-at-the-exact-same-.html • Fulton County, Georgia: Over 104,994 Ballot Images Were Electronically Manipulated https://rumble.com/vwr6un-fulton-county-georgia-over-104994-ballot-images-were-electronically-manipul.html • Dominion Machines aren’t only stealing Republican elections, they steal Democrat Elections too-Michelle Long Spears https://rumble.com/v2w0buc-dominion-machines-stole-georgia-democrat-michelle-long-spears-2022-midterm-.html • Atlanta, Georgia Election Fraud- Emmaus House - Thousands of People Registered to Vote at Location https://rumble.com/v38n7xe-atlanta-georgia-election-fraud-emmaus-house-thousands-of-people-register-at.html • 32,400 votes taken from David Perdue live on ABC during the GA Senate run-off. https://rumble.com/v45n2df-32400-votes-taken-from-david-perdue-live-on-abc-during-the-ga-senate-run-of.html

The Arizona Mail-In Ballot Scam that stole the 2020 Election Tip/Donating (everything I do is free, so any tips are appreciated) https://www.givesendgo.com/theunshakeablepundit Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Oper rumble.com
Arizona Midterm Election Was Rigged! Hear it from the People Who Voted! Video Montage! Exclusive: Arizona Voters speak Out on Election Day Debacle in Maricopa County Truth Seeker in my Spare Time Telegram is my home base of Operations— follow me at t.me/candlesinthenight Truth Social at rumble.com
Maricopa County, Arizona: MAJOR TABULATOR ISSUES “75% SUCCESS RATE” November 8, 2022 Truth Seeker in my Spare Time Telegram is my home base of Operations— follow me at t.me/candlesinthenight Truth Social at @MJTruth Gab https://gab.com/mjtruth ALL MY RUMBLE CHANNELS - Feel Goods https rumble.com
Arizona Ballot Traffickers Caught on Camera Forging Ballots! Former Mayors & School Board Members Involved! Involved in the trafficking: - Guillermina Fuentes- Mayor & Now School Board Member - Rosa Velera- Mayor & School board member - Alma Juarez, neighbor and pleaded guilty Associated story https://www.t rumble.com
Whistleblowers Expose Arizona’s Ballot Trafficking ‘Mafia,’ Implicates GOP Was Highly Involved Whistleblowers Expose Arizona’s Ballot Trafficking ‘Mafia,’ Implicate GOP Two men in Yuma County, Arizona, David Lara and Gary Snyder, took down a San Luis ballot trafficking operation using undercove rumble.com
Exhibit Ex. 8 CISA and Flagging – #71, Att. #8 in Missouri v. Biden (W.D. La., 3:22-cv-01213) – CourtListener.com JOINT STATEMENT on Discovery Disputes by All Parties (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Ex. 1 Defendants Interrogatory Responses, # 2 Exhibit Ex. 2 Census-Treasury-State, # 3 Exhibit Ex. 3 White House, # 4 Exhibit Ex. 4 Facebook Executive, # 5 Exhibit Ex. 5 Text Messages, # 6 Exhibit Ex. 6 BOLO, # 7 Exhibit Ex. 7 Approval of Debunks, # 8 Exhibit Ex. 8 CISA and Flagging, # 9 Exhibit Ex. 9 Reporting Channels, # 10 Exhibit Ex. 10 KJP RFP Responses, # 11 Exhibit Ex. 11 Fauci RFP Responses, # 12 Exhibit Ex. 12 Aug 27 Email from DOJ, # 13 Exhibit Ex. 13 HHS RFP Responses)(aty,Sauer, Dean) Modified on 8/31/2022 to add filers and modify docket text (Miletello, A). (Entered: 08/31/2022) courtlistener.com
Jacqueline Breger Testimony: Maricopa County Computer Data Base Designed with Backdoors. Identies of Bribed Recipients, Including Elected Officials, & 25,000 Falsified Ballots & a Significant Sum of Cash at a Private Residence in Mesa County Full Testimony: https://rumble.com/v2atuu4-az-committee-jacqueline-breger-bombshell-testimony.html Truth Seeker in my Spare Time Telegram is my home base of Operations— follow me at t.me/candlesinthen rumble.com
Director of Elections Admits They performed Signature verification in Private Offices With No Observers - We should Trust they did Everything Right, Right? Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci rumble.com
Arizona Maricopa County - Secret Testing on Tabulators After Legally Required Logic & Accuracy Test On October 14th, 17th & 18th, Maricopa County performed secret testing on the tabulators This was AFTER the legally required Logic & Accuracy test 260 of 446 tabulators failed They were used on electi rumble.com
Arizona Maricopa County - Officials Not Aware they were Being Recorded, Broke into Machines After Being Tested & Sealed Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci rumble.com
The California Glitch Switch- They Robbed Steve Garvey - March 5, 2024 Tip/Donating (everything I do is free, so any tips are appreciated) https://www.givesendgo.com/theunshakeablepundit Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Oper rumble.com
Connecticut - Town Clerk Dumping Multiple Illegal Absentee Ballots Into a Drop Box - Election FRAUD! Article https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/09/connecticut-democrat-primary-election-scandal-police-launch-investigation/ Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base rumble.com
Bridgeport Connecticut Redid their Election because of Fraud and they Had Fraud Again! Tip/Donating (everything I do is free, so any tips are appreciated) https://www.givesendgo.com/theunshakeablepundit You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesint rumble.com
Gwinnett County, Georgia: A Ballot Trafficking Mule Stuffs the Ballot Box! Gwinnett County, Georgia: A Ballot Trafficking Mule Stuffs the Ballot Box! Political Junkie & Truth teller in my spare time. ww.theunshakeablepundit.com Find Me on Telegram at t.me/candlesinthenight F rumble.com
Gwinnett County, Georgia: Ballot Trafficking Mule STUFFS Ballot Box In BROAD DAYLIGHT! Gwinnett County, Georgia: Woman STUFFS Ballot Box I. BROAD DAYLIGHT! Political Junkie & Truth teller in my spare time. www.theunshakeablepundit.com Find Me on Telegram at t.me/candlesinthenight Find m rumble.com
Fulton County, Georgia: This Woman Wore Gloves For Her Ballot Drop Offs! Fulton County, Georgia: This Woman Wore Gloves For Her Ballot Drop Offs! Political Junkie & Truth teller in my spare time. www.theunshakeablepundit.com Find Me on Telegram at t.me/candlesinthenight Fi rumble.com
Fulton County, Georgia: All Closing Tapes For Early In-Person Ballots Are Unsigned Election Fraud! All closing tapes for early in-person ballots are unsigned 315,000 ballots nobody swore actually occurred "This alone says that something happened with these ballots when they were bei rumble.com
Fulton County, Georgia: 16,034 Ballot Images Were Added DAYS AFTER the Ballots Were Scanned 16,034 ballot images were added days AFTER the ballots were scanned "That's not possible...What that means is there is not a single ballot cast in Fulton County that we can authenticate." Political Ju rumble.com
Full Hearing: SOS Raffensperger Facilitated Ballot Harvesting in Georgia! The Truth about the Georgia Elections REPORT: SOS Raffensperger Facilitated Ballot Harvesting in Georgia – Then Defended Results with Completely Bogus Report (VIDEO) On Wednesday, 2/9/2022, Garland Favorito and VoterGA presented their lat rumble.com
First Video of Alleged Ballot Trafficker in Georgia Is Released- True The Vote Investigations On Friday, VoterGA’s David Cross shared an example of True the Vote’s surveillance footage. https://twitter.com/gaballots/status/1487209392915288064?s=21 My Website tracks election fraud and the Pland rumble.com
Page not found | VOTER GA Voters Organized for Trusted Election Results in Georgia voterga.org
Page not found | VOTER GA Voters Organized for Trusted Election Results in Georgia voterga.org
Page not found | VOTER GA Voters Organized for Trusted Election Results in Georgia voterga.org
Fulton County, Georgia: 374,128 In-Person Ballot Images Are Missing ALL 374,128 in-person ballot images in Fulton County are missing in violation of federal and state law Political Junkie & Truth teller in my spare time. I run a Website in my spare time that tracks el rumble.com
Fulton County, Georgia: Over 4,000 Ballots Were All Scanned at the Exact Same Time Over 4,000 ballots were all scanned at the exact same time Unconventional Political Junkie & Truth teller in my spare time. I run a Website in my spare time that tracks election fraud, human Trafficki rumble.com
Fulton County, Georgia: Over 104,994 Ballot Images Were Electronically Manipulated Over 104,994 ballot image files were electronically manipulated "What we normally see is a 1 second delay between the two. What we're seeing here in this case is several minutes...we have further dela rumble.com
Dominion Machines Stole Georgia Democrat Michelle Long Spears 2022 Midterm Primary Election Source https://www.nytimes.com/2022/06/06/us/politics/michelle-long-spears-georgia.html Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesi rumble.com
Atlanta, Georgia Election Fraud - Emmaus House - Thousands of People Registered to Vote at Location Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci rumble.com
32,400 votes taken from David Perdue live on ABC during the GA Senate run-off. Tip/Donating (everything I do is free, so any tips are appreciated) https://www.givesendgo.com/theunshakeablepundit Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Oper rumble.com

@MJTruthUltra - MJTruthUltra

⚫️ PENNSYLVANIA • Illegal Electioneering For John Fetterman & Josh Shapiro Caught on Undercover Video https://rumble.com/v1spz38-breaking-illegal-electioneering-for-john-fetterman-and-josh-shapiro-caught-.html • MAN Caught on LIVE TV During Faulkner Focus Marking Numerous Ballots! STOP THE STEAL!!!! November 8, 2022 https://rumble.com/v1smblw-man-caught-on-live-tv-marking-numerous-ballots-stop-the-steal-november-8-20.html • Pennsylvania Drop Box Opened For First Time Came Pre-Loaded With Ballots! https://rumble.com/v1q8j83-pennsylvania-drop-box-opened-for-first-time-came-pre-loaded-with-ballots.html • Trucker Whistleblower- I Hauled Completed Mail-In Ballots Across State Lines https://rumble.com/v12ibxz-trucker-whistleblower-i-hauled-completed-mail-in-ballots-across-state-lines.html • Philadelphia Observer Photographed 40-50 People Entering The Vote Counting Center With Backpacks https://rumble.com/v12hwlo-philadelphia-observer-photographed-40-50-people-entering-the-vote-counting-.html • Pennsylvania: Ballot Trafficker Breaking Up Pile of Harvested Ballots To Stuff Them Into Drop Box https://rumble.com/vxzxmf-pennsylvania-ballot-trafficker-breaking-up-pile-of-harvested-ballots-to-stu.html • 350,000 in-Person Votes being Removed from Republicans in the recent 2023 Supreme Court race, with no explanation! rumble.com/v3w5bpy-audit-… • Watch 19,958 votes switched from Donald Trump to Joe Biden live on CNN. https://rumble.com/v45n336-19958-votes-switched-from-donald-trump-to-joe-biden-live-on-cnn..html ⚫️ MICHIGAN • Voters Being Told They’ve Already Voted Absentee Ballot! November 8, 2022 https://rumble.com/v1slgpy-voters-in-detroit-michigan-are-being-told-theyve-already-voted-absentee-bal.html • Same Woman Stuffs a Drop Box Four Different Times https://rumble.com/v15ibbt-detroit-michigan-same-woman-stuffs-a-drop-box-four-different-times.html • Ballot Mule: Mail man Dropping Multiple Ballots off over Many Trips https://rumble.com/v11rrbk-ballot-mule-mail-man-dropping-multiple-ballots-off-over-many-trips.html • Ballot Mule: Who came out of the Department of Elections with stacks of Ballots! https://rumble.com/v11rrgn-ballot-mule-just-a-man-walking-around-with-a-huge-stack-of-ballots-nothing-.html • Ballot Mule: Signs & Drops Stacks of Ballots Off Committing Multiple Felonies https://rumble.com/v11rr63-ballot-mule-signs-and-drops-stacks-of-ballots-off-committing-multiple-felon.html • Police Find: TENS OF THOUSANDS of Fake Registrations, Bags of Pre-Paid Gift Cards, Guns with Silencers, Burner Phones, and a Democrat-Funded Organization https://rumble.com/v35tqrw-massive-2020-voter-fraud-in-michigan-police-find-tens-of-thousands-of-fake-.html ⚫️ MISSISSIPPI • Hinds County Democrat Supervisor David Archie - We have Videotape of Jacquie Amos Bringing in Thumb Drives, Going into & bringing in Ballots to be Inserted into Machines https://rumble.com/v3e54yi-mississippi-hinds-county-democrat-supervisor-says-election-was-rigged-and-h.html ⚫️ NEW YORK • Midterm Election Fraud Bombshell of Duplicated Vote Counts in Almost Every Single County! https://rumble.com/v1t23sc-new-york-midterm-election-fraud-bobmshell-of-duplicated-votes-counts-in-alm.html • Democrat New York Election Inspector Deceives Voting System to Secure Official Republican Position https://rumble.com/v1spygq-democrat-new-york-election-inspector-deceives-voting-system-to-secure-offic.html ⚫️ SOUTH CAROLINA Leaked Call: SC Democrat Krystle Mathews Wants to Infiltrate GOP with “Secret Sleepers” and Fund Campaign with Dope Money https://rumble.com/v1a5jg6-leaked-call-sc-democrat-krystle-mathews-wants-to-infiltrate-gop-with-secret.html ⚫️ TEXAS • Poll Pads in Dallas Were CAUGHT Adding Hundreds of Voters in Real Time as the Polls Closed! https://rumble.com/v1u5t0k-texas-poll-pads-in-dallas-were-caught-adding-hundreds-of-voters-in-real-tim.html ⚫️ WISCONSIN • 625,000 Dead People On Wisconsin’s Voter Rolls https://rumble.com/vumvp8-wisconsin-625000-dead-people-on-wisconsins-voter-rolls.html • Wisconsin Has 4 Million Adults but 7.1 Million Voter Registrations https://rumble.com/vumym8-wisconsin-wisconsin-has-4-million-adults-but-7.1-million-voter-registration.html • One Address Had 359 “Voters” That Hasn’t Existed for 10 Years Are Still Registered There https://rumble.com/vumxzl-wisconsin-one-address-had-359-voters-that-hasnt-existed-for-10-years-are-st.html • MASSIVE Amounts of Voters Registered In Small Living Areas Revealed https://rumble.com/vumxi4-wisconsin-massive-amounts-of-voters-in-small-living-areas-revealed.html • Instances Where ONE Voter Was Assigned 28 DIFFERENT ID NUMBERS! https://rumble.com/vumwql-wisconsin-instances-where-one-voter-was-assigned-28-different-id-numbers.html • 5.6% Illegal Votes From Voters Who Moved & Phantom Votes= 165,000 Illegal Votes https://rumble.com/vumun2-wisconsin-5.6-illegal-votes-from-voters-who-moved-and-phantom-votes-165000-.html • 3,713 "Voters" Registered to Vote From U.S. Post Offices https://rumble.com/vumti7-wisconsin-3713-voters-registered-to-u.s.-post-offices.html • 113 Ballots were Cast From The SAME ADDRESS, Where NO ONE LIVED! https://rumble.com/vumspx-wisconsin-113-ballots-were-cast-from-the-same-address-where-no-one-lived.html • 1.5 MILLION Illegal Voter Registrations and 155,000 Suspected FAKE Ballots https://rumble.com/vumro4-wisconsin-1.5-illegal-voter-registrations-and-155000-suspected-fake-ballots.html • Over 50,000 Fraudulent Votes Cast from Phantom Voters Identified in Wisconsin https://rumble.com/vumr6n-huge-over-50000-fraudulent-votes-cast-from-phantom-voters-identified-in-wis.html • How They Cheated. Dirty Voter Rolls, Mass Mail In Ballots, Traffickers, NGO’s, Drop Boxes https://rumble.com/vz8ju3-wisconsin-how-they-did-it.-dirty-voter-rolls-mass-mail-in-ballots-trafficke.html • Election Bribery Scheme Discovered in Supreme Court Case involving leftist group “Wisconsin Takes Action” https://rumble.com/v2bdmss-wisconsin-bombshell-election-bribery-scheme-discovered-with-wisconsin-takes.html • Double Voting Occurring With Same Voter Registration With Different Voter ID Numbers https://rumble.com/vumvi6-wisconsin-double-voting-occurring-with-same-voter-registration-with-differe.html • Former USPS employee Ethan Pease, blows the whistle on 100,000 missing Wisconsin ballots https://rumble.com/v3k45ch-wisconsin-a-former-usps-employee-blows-the-whistle-on-100000-missing-wiscon.html • Wisconsin: 138 Ballot Traffickers Went to Drop Boxes 3,568 Times https://rumble.com/vz8cel-wisconsin-138-ballot-traffickers-went-to-drop-boxes-3568-times.html

BREAKING: Illegal Electioneering For John Fetterman & Josh Shapiro Caught on Undercover Video Truth Seeker in my Spare Time Telegram is my home base of Operations— follow me at t.me/candlesinthenight Truth Social at @MJTruth Gab https://gab.com/mjtruth ALL MY RUMBLE CHANNELS - Feel Goods https rumble.com
MAN Caught on LIVE TV During Faulkner Focus Marking Numerous Ballots! STOP THE STEAL!!!! November 8, 2022 Truth Seeker in my Spare Time Telegram is my home base of Operations— follow me at t.me/candlesinthenight Truth Social at @MJTruth Gab https://gab.com/mjtruth ALL MY RUMBLE CHANNELS - Feel Goods https rumble.com
Pennsylvania Drop Box Opened For First Time Came Pre-Loaded With Ballots! Truth Seeker in my Spare Time Telegram is my home base of Operations— follow me at t.me/candlesinthenight Truth Social at @MJTruth Gab https://gab.com/mjtruth ALL MY RUMBLE CHANNELS - Feel Goods https rumble.com
Trucker Whistleblower- I Hauled Completed Mail-In Ballots Across State Lines #ElectionFraud True the Vote Pennsylvania trucker Jesse Morgan drove approximately 288,000 completed mail-in ballots from Bethpage, New York to the USPS facility in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania where he w rumble.com
Philadelphia Observer Photographed 40-50 People Entering The Vote Counting Center With Backpacks True the Vote On election night, an observer at the Philadelphia Convention Center photographed approximately forty to fifty people entering the vote-counting center with backpacks, bags, and purses w rumble.com
Pennsylvania: Ballot Trafficker Breaking Up Pile of Harvested Ballots To Stuff Them Into Drop Box Video Captures Pennsylvania Ballot Trafficker Forced to Break-Up Fat Pile of Harvested Ballots Into Smaller Stacks to Stuff Them Into Drop Box A video obtained by the Montgomery County Republican Comm rumble.com
19,958 votes switched from Donald Trump to Joe Biden live on CNN. Tip/Donating (everything I do is free, so any tips are appreciated) https://www.givesendgo.com/theunshakeablepundit Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Oper rumble.com
Voters in Detroit Michigan are Being Told They’ve Already Voted Absentee Ballot! November 8, 2022 BREAKING: Voters in Detroit, MI are showing up to the polls being told they've already voted absentee when they arrive. Truth Seeker in my Spare Time Telegram is my home base of Operations— follow me rumble.com
Detroit, Michigan— Same Woman Stuffs a Drop Box Four Different Times Detroit, Michigan— Same Woman Stuffs a Drop Box Four Different Times Political Junkie & Truth teller in my spare time. www.theunshakeablepundit.com Find Me on Telegram at t.me/candlesinthenight Find m rumble.com
Ballot Mule: Mail man Dropping Multiple Ballots off over Many Trips Ballot Mule: Mail man Dropping Multiple Ballots off over Many Trips Political Junkie & Truth teller in my spare time. www.theunshakeablepundit.com Find Me on Telegram at t.me/candlesinthenight Find me rumble.com
Ballot Mule: Just a Man Walking Around With a Huge Stack of Ballots! Nothing to See Here… Ballot Mule: Just a Man Walking Around With a Huge Stack of Ballots! Nothing to See Here… Political Junkie & Truth teller in my spare time. www.theunshakeablepundit.com Find Me on Telegram at t.me/can rumble.com
Ballot Mule: Signs & Drops Stacks of Ballots Off Committing Multiple Felonies Ballot Mule: Signs & Drops Stacks of Ballots Off Committing Multiple Felonies Political Junkie & Truth teller in my spare time. www.theunshakeablepundit.com Find Me on Telegram at t.me/candlesinthenig rumble.com
Massive 2020 Voter Fraud in Michigan - Police Find: TENS OF THOUSANDS of Fake Registrations, Bags of Pre-Paid Gift Cards, Guns with Silencers, Burner Phones, and a Democrat-Funded Organization with Facilities in Several States 2020 Police Report October 2020 POLICE REPORT https://archive.org/details/msp-foia-1-of-2/mode/2up?view=theater TGP Article https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/08/now-we-have-proof-tgp-exclusive-mas rumble.com
Mississippi - Hinds County Democrat Supervisor says Election was Rigged & Has Video Tape Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci rumble.com
New York Midterm Election Fraud Bombshell of Duplicated Vote Counts in Almost Every Single County! Get this to Lee Zeldin! This data is from DDHQ (Decision Desk HQ), as it is verified on the video itself. DDHQ data (verified in video. Top left corner) New York had 99% votes in at 8:33PM. There was never an escalation of v rumble.com
Democrat New York Election Inspector Deceives Voting System to Secure Official Republican Position Truth Seeker in my Spare Time Telegram is my home base of Operations— follow me at t.me/candlesinthenight Truth Social at @MJTruth Gab https://gab.com/mjtruth ALL MY RUMBLE CHANNELS - Feel Goods https rumble.com
Leaked Call: SC Democrat Krystle Mathews Wants to Infiltrate GOP with “Secret Sleepers” and Fund Campaign with Dope Money Leaked Call: SC Democrat Krystle Mathews Wants to Infiltrate GOP with “Secret Sleepers” & Fund Campaign with Dope Money Source: www.projectveritas.com Political Commentator & Truth teller in my spare rumble.com
TEXAS Poll Pads in Dallas Were CAUGHT Adding Hundreds of Voters in Real Time as the Polls Closed! Associated Article: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/11/breaking-exclusive-election-poll-pads-caught-adding-hundreds-voters-real-time-texas-poll-closed-video/ TEXAS 🚨 Footage reveals that poll pa rumble.com
Wisconsin- 625,000 Dead People On Wisconsin’s Voter Rolls 625,000 dead people on Wisconsin's voter rolls My Website tracks election fraud and the Plandemic. I have resource guides, exemption forms, etc. www.theunshakeablepundit.com Find Me on TG at t.me/cand rumble.com
Wisconsin- Wisconsin Has 4 Million Adults but 7.1 Million Voter Registrations Wisconsin has 4 million adults but 7.1 million voter registrations My Website tracks election fraud and the Plandemic. I have resource guides, exemption forms, etc. www.theunshakeablepundit.com Find M rumble.com
Wisconsin- One Address Had 359 “Voters” That Hasn’t Existed for 10 Years Are Still Registered There "Here's an address that hasn't existed for 10 years." 359 "voters" are still registered there My Website tracks election fraud and the Plandemic. I have resource guides, exemption forms, etc. www.theu rumble.com
Wisconsin- MASSIVE Amounts of Voters Registered In Small Living Areas Revealed 2 bedroom apartment has 26 registered "voters" 16 unit building with 290 registered "voters" Single family home with 19 registered "voters" "We've found tens of thousands of these." My Website tracks rumble.com
Wisconsin- Instances Where ONE Voter Was Assigned 28 DIFFERENT ID NUMBERS! Instances of one voter assigned 28 different voter ID numbers My Website tracks election fraud and the Plandemic. I have resource guides, exemption forms, etc. www.theunshakeablepundit.com Find Me on rumble.com
Wisconsin- 5.6% Illegal Votes From Voters Who Moved & Phantom Votes= 165,000 Illegal Votes Rock County, WI 5.6% illegally cast ballots from voters who moved and phantom votes Extrapolates to 4,795 in one county "Even if we're off by 50%, which I know we're not, I go over these numbers every rumble.com
Wisconsin- 3,713 "Voters" Registered to Vote From U.S. Post Offices 3,713 "voters" registered to Vote From U.S. post office My Website tracks election fraud and the Plandemic. I have resource guides, exemption forms, etc. www.theunshakeablepundit.com Find Me on TG at rumble.com
Wisconsin- 113 Ballots were Cast From The SAME ADDRESS, Where NO ONE LIVED! 113 ballots were cast from address where no one lives My Website tracks election fraud and the Plandemic. I have resource guides, exemption forms, etc. www.theunshakeablepundit.com Find Me on TG at t. rumble.com
Wisconsin- 1.5 MILLION Illegal Voter Registrations and 155,000 Suspected FAKE Ballots 1.5 million illegal voter registrations 155,000 suspected fake voters "Well over -- well over -- 50,000 illegally cast ballots that we can prove" from Nov. 3, 2020 My Website tracks election fraud and rumble.com
HUGE! Over 50,000 Fraudulent Votes Cast from Phantom Voters Identified in Wisconsin HUGE! Over 50,000 Fraudulent Votes Cast from Phantom Voters Identified in Wisconsin More than twice the margin on Nov. 3 My Website tracks election fraud and the Plandemic. I have resource guides, exe rumble.com
Wisconsin: How They Cheated. Dirty Voter Rolls, Mass Mail In Ballots, Traffickers, NGO’s, Drop Boxes Wisconsin: How They Did It. Dirty Voter Rolls, Mass Mail In Ballots, Traffickers, NGO’s, Drop Boxes Political Junkie & Truth teller in my spare time. ww.theunshakeablepundit.com Find Me on Telegram at rumble.com
Wisconsin Bombshell: Election Bribery Scheme Discovered in Wisconsin Supreme Court Race Wisconsin Bombshell: Election Bribery Scheme Discovered with Wisconsin Takes Action Truth Seeker in my Spare Time Telegram is my home base of Operations— follow me at t.me/candlesinthenight Truth Soci rumble.com
Wisconsin- Double Voting Occurring With Same Voter Registration With Different Voter ID Numbers Double votes! Countless examples of same exact voter registration, with different voter ID numbers My Website tracks election fraud and the Plandemic. I have resource guides, exemption forms, etc. www rumble.com
Wisconsin - A former USPS employee blows the whistle on 100,000 missing Wisconsin ballots Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Operations https://t.me/candlesinthenight TWITTER https://mobile.twitter.com/MJTruthUltra Truth Social https://truthsoci rumble.com
Wisconsin: 138 Ballot Traffickers Went to Drop Boxes 3,568 Times Wisconsin: 138 Ballot Traffickers Went to Drop Boxes 3,568 Times Political Junkie & Truth teller in my spare time. ww.theunshakeablepundit.com Find Me on Telegram at t.me/candlesinthenight Find me on rumble.com

@MJTruthUltra - MJTruthUltra

In Conclusion: I hope you enjoyed this thread. Our elections are obviously not safe and secure. May God bless us and guide us out of this mess we have found ourselves in. 🙏

@MJTruthUltra - MJTruthUltra

Forgot this one 🚨 Fulton County, Georgia admitted they didn’t do Signature Verification AT ALL, in the 2020 Election https://rumble.com/v4gsynq-fulton-county-admitted-they-didnt-do-signature-verification-in-fulton-count.html • They have an electronic verification system, but they admitted they did not use it. • They admitted they have records of voter signatures, but did not use it. • They have records of voter signatures, but they admitted they did not use them. • They’re essentially saying they could check their records but they’re saying it would take forever. This video is from a hearing to talk about the subpoenas that Harrison Floyd put together to get election evidence… His attorneys said what if we prove Trump won, Trumps RICO case goes away. The Georgia Secretary State agreed to comply with the subpoena and now Fulton County has self-incriminated themselves. BOOM. 💥

Fulton County admitted they didn’t do Signature Verification in Fulton County at all in 2020 Tip/Donating (everything I do is free, so any tips are appreciated) https://www.givesendgo.com/theunshakeablepundit Truth Seeker in my Spare Time You Can Follow Me at: Telegram is my home base of Oper rumble.com
myhiddenvalue
Posted - July 6, 2024 at 12:55 PM
Saved - July 6, 2024 at 10:23 PM

@myhiddenvalue - Not A Number

IT expert, after gaining access to a forensic image of the Dominion Rigging Management System in Mesa County Colorado, demonstrates how your government was overthrown on Nov 3, 2020, https://t.co/zTCWXoLR0z

Video Transcript AI Summary
In Mesa County, Colorado, IT experts demonstrate how easy it is to switch thousands of votes from Trump to Biden using a backdoor utility in the Dominion election management system. The tool allows them to change the results without leaving a trace. In Pennsylvania, live TV footage shows nearly 20,000 votes being switched from Trump to Biden, resulting in Trump losing almost 40,000 votes. The manipulation occurs within minutes, highlighting vulnerabilities in the voting system.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Being awarded to Biden and Jorgensen's totals being awarded to Trump. After gaining access to a forensic image of the Dominion election management system in Mesa County, Colorado, IT experts demonstrate how easy it is to switch tens of thousands of votes from Trump to Biden in seconds by simply changing the index number next to each candidate's name. Speaker 1: This is a a backdoor utility called SQL Server Management Studio that is actually installed on the image of the voting system. Speaker 0: So is it certified? Speaker 1: It is not on the list of certified software. What I'm gonna do first, I'm just gonna pull up the presidential results in Mesa County for that election. And here they are. You can see Biden has 31, 000, Trump has 56, 000. So I'm gonna come up here now, and I'm going to make a quick change. Change that. You change that to a 2? Yep. I'm changing Trump to a 1. K. And then I'm going to come up here, and I'm gonna rerun it. Report. And there you go. Biden, 56, 000. Trump, 31, 000. So I just flipped the results of the election using a tool that's actually built in to the voting system. And what I did is not even logged. There's no trace of what I just did now. For some reason, the logging of activities by a user that has the password are not retained. Speaker 0: In Pennsylvania on live TV, Trump had 1, 690, 000 589 votes, while Biden had 1, 252, 537 votes. The time was approximately 1108 Eastern Standard Time. The next interval report shows Trump's votes decreasing to 1, 670, 631, and Biden's votes increasing to 1, 272, 495. The time is approximately 11:0:9 PM. Live on CNN, exactly 19, 958 votes were switched from Trump to Biden. This means Trump lost 30 9, 916 votes.
realLizUSA
Posted - October 1, 2024 at 1:16 PM
Saved - October 2, 2024 at 1:12 PM

@realLizUSA - Liz Harrington

This is new??? Two experts testify in DeKalb GOP v Raffensperger that the election system in Gwinnett County, Georgia was remotely accessed from Belgrade, Serbia DURING the 2020 Election Similar activity also happened in Colorado, Michigan, and other states https://t.co/s00FxPLGsP

Video Transcript AI Summary
According to the testimony, Dominion equipment is generally not connected to the internet, but there is evidence of a connection in Gwinnett County, Georgia, during the 2020 election. Non-election personnel have remotely accessed a Dominion system. Dominion emails discuss remotely accessing Gwinnett County, Georgia. There is evidence of Dominion remotely accessing Georgia election equipment in one county, along with involvement in Colorado and Michigan. Dominion can remotely connect to election systems without detection, and this has occurred. The Denver, Colorado server granted access to Belgrade, with questions raised about why Belgrade, Montana, would need to connect to a Colorado file transfer server. Changes to the database server lack an engineering change order, which is important for change management and system integrity.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And it's your understanding the Georgia Dominion equipment is not connected to the Internet. Right? Speaker 1: That's it. Correct. Speaker 0: So you believe Dominion Voting System components in Georgia are connected? Speaker 1: Some unrelated Dominion documentation. I can specifically tell you that there was there is connection. Speaker 0: Which county in Georgia was there a connection for to the Internet of Dominion equipment? Speaker 1: It would be Gwinnet, if I'm remembering correctly. There were several states involved. Speaker 0: And which time period are you referring to? Speaker 1: This was 2020. Speaker 0: Before or after the election? Speaker 1: During the election. Speaker 2: In your examination of any of these Dominion systems, have you seen any indication of non election personnel remotely accessing a Dominion system? Speaker 1: Yes. Speaker 2: Can you tell us about that? Speaker 3: I too have reviewed a series of emails produced by Dominion in which they're discussing remoting into Gwinnett County, Georgia. Speaker 0: You also mentioned Dominion remotely connecting to election systems, but you don't have any evidence that occurred in Georgia. Correct? Speaker 1: There was one county. I've seen a lot of Dominion emails. I've had to translate Dominion emails from Serbian to English to verify the technical questions I was being asked about them, to verify that it was translated properly. So Speaker 0: So it's your testimony that there there is evidence of Dominion remotely accessing Georgia election equipment? Speaker 1: Yes. On the one county. It was included with stuff that I was researching and reading through considering Colorado. Michigan was also involved and there were other ones. Speaker 2: To your understanding, is Dominion able to remotely connect to these election systems? Speaker 1: Yes. Speaker 2: Are they able to do that without detection? Speaker 0: Yes. Speaker 2: Are you aware of any instances in which that has occurred? Speaker 1: Yes. Speaker 2: Can you identify those instances? Speaker 1: One would be the Denver, Colorado server was granted or requested to grant Belgrade, only Belgrade. I did search. There is a Belgrade Montana. Again, why would Montana need to connect into a Colorado file transfer server as per election system? And there are other components and things that were done in the background concerning the database and the configure of the database server that still do not have an engineering change order. Because if somebody works in an operational environments for a lot of different things, what I will tell you is sometimes things break or you have a problem and you have to fix it. And you you submit a change request or, in this case, an engineering change order that's retroactive. Right? You wanna go back and make sure that you record the process so that you have change management and integrity of the system. If you do not record changes, you lead yourself down a a very bad road.
AzPinkLady
Posted - October 22, 2024 at 7:39 PM
Saved - October 24, 2024 at 1:15 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m concerned that Colbeck’s breaking news hasn’t gained the attention it deserves, suggesting a lack of understanding or trust in the source. The investigation team has revealed extensive documentation linking Dominion to Smartmatic and foreign influences, raising alarms about election integrity. I believe immediate action is necessary, including an injunction against Dominion and a return to hand-counted ballots. The history of election systems is complex and troubling, and it’s crucial that politicians act now to investigate these claims thoroughly.

@AzPinkLady - AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

The fact that Colbeck’s breaking news post has not had millions of views by now makes me believe people don’t understand the significance of the disclosure or don’t trust the source. If you have been following @PatrickByrne you will have known about these claims already. Today - the investigation team drops the receipts proving Dominion is a Smartmatic Venezuelan mastermind with Serbian/China programming & China/Taiwan parts & assembly. It really is too much information to snip & thread. There are over 200 events between 1997 & 2024. You have to read for yourself. Documentation proving the claims are provided. https://stolenelectionsfacts.com I have put the YouTube video below because, well… it’s YouTube. https://youtu.be/nbPiuhIpHL8?feature=shared… @pnjaban @GinaSwoboda there needs to be an immediate injunction at the Supreme Court to stop the use of Dominion. This is a National Emergency. No elections running Dominion can be trusted. It is evident the Biden administration can not be trusted with this information I expect this evidence & the source code to be presented in court with a panel of EXPERTS who understand technology & coding to judge the veracity of the claims. @realAlexKolodin @WendyRogersAZ @SonnyBorrelli @JohnKavanagh_AZ @electjacqparker @Wadsack4Arizona @votewarren @RepBenToma I expect that you can exercise your authorities /file an injunction to put a halt to proceedings. In addition to putting in place a full hand count as demonstrated by @WethePeopleAZA1.

StolenElectionsFacts stolenelectionsfacts.com

@pjcolbeck - Patrick Colbeck✝️

All of my sources indicate that both he and the information he shares is legit. One of my trusted confidants has even seen the evidence. As a minimum, this information should provide significant exculpatory evidence in support of lawsuits against my fellow #MeddlingKids such as Tina Peters, Mike Lindell, Stefanie Lambert, Patrick Byrnes, Sidney Powell and others. The endgame, however, needs to be the elimination of electronic voting systems and a return to the hand count of paper ballots on a single election day by voters whose identity has been confirmed with a photo ID.

@AzPinkLady - AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

Dominion sets up shop in Serbia. https://stolenelectionsfacts.com/2011/05/03/dominion-voting-system-build-your-first-datacenter-in-belgrade-serbia/

Dominion set up its primary data center in Serbia with Huawei strategic partner – StolenElectionsFacts stolenelectionsfacts.com

@AzPinkLady - AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

Sequoia acquired Smartmatic. Dominion acquired Sequoia. https://t.co/h09gQqyj93

@AzPinkLady - AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

This is why this matters! China, Iran, with the help from Cuba & Venezuela has conquered America! This is just one segment of the “how they did it”, please watch all the segments!! For 20 years our elections have been selections. Arizona’s first clue was that McCain kept getting elected. He is hated here, except by RINO - aka money & power. The 2nd clue? The took out @RealSheriffJoe to get control over the border & illegal invasion. I have attached the history of how all election systems married together is long & convoluted on purpose. (1 of 2). As soon as one name gets “hot” they off load the code to another company under another name. Byrne & his team have the code of Dominion! Line by line it is the same as Smartmatic!! @KariLake @KariLakeWarRoom @AbrahamHamadeh @NealCarterAz@JosephChaplik@RealAlexKolodin@CoryMcGarr@electJacqParker@michelePenaAz@BevPingerelli@SonnyBorrelli@JakeHoffmanAz@JohnKavanagh_Az@VoteWarren@WendyRogersAz You have standing as candidates. File a class action together! This is our last chance! If we let this go on, we will forever be a communist country & NEVER have another free & fair election!

@PatrickByrne - Patrick Byrne

Chapter 5 of 6: How Smartmatic Subverted the World https://t.co/bYpwr6ktxc

Video Transcript AI Summary
The cartel, mafia, and Hugo Chavez recognized an "edge" in election machinery. Smartmatic bought Sequoia, injecting intellectual property for election rigging. Diebold's hardware and Sequoia's/Smartmatic's software merged into Dominion, Heart IntraCivic, and ES&S systems. Dominion rewrote Smartmatic's C++ software into C#, maintaining the same module-by-module structure. This software originated from Venezuela's National Election Commission under Chavez and Fidel Castro. Smartmatic has a factory in Taiwan assembling computers with components from a factory near Beijing, controlled by Xi Jinping. Smartmatic allegedly conceals its supply chain with Iran's help, using oil transfer pricing to bypass banking systems. Jorge Rodriguez implied Venezuela could expose rigged elections in the US, Europe, and South America if pressured. During a vote by the Organization of American States, some South American countries abstained.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Why should you care about any of this? Because what happened subsequently is the cartel, the mafia, Hugo Chavez figured out this was a real edge. And Smartmatic next bought an American election machinery company called Sequoia, the old mechanical like, I first voted on as a kid and which was just getting into computerized systems in 20 years ago, they bought them. In addition, the company Diebold whom you know today, they make ATMs. They've made ATMs all my life. Anywhere you see ATMs, you always see Diebold. But back 20 years ago, they also own a division that made election machines, voting machines. Here's a report of Fortune Magazine story from the time. And they had their voting machines. They were in they were forced by the Department of Justice under Eric Holder to divest their voting machine division. And, Smartmatic bought Sequoia and they injected their intellectual property in it with a licensing agreement. They gave licenses to all their all their election rigging stuff. And between the Sequoia and the Diebold voting, hardware, the software and the hardware, the following happened. Now, you know when you go buying a laptop, if it's not a Macintosh, if you're buying a PC, be be it HP or Dell or Lenovo, when you buy one of those, they have those brand names on the outside but inside, the operating market today are Dominion, Heart IntraCivic and ES and S. Whichever one of those you buy, on the inside, you are getting this marriage of of Sequoia, of Smartmatic intellectual property via Sequoia and the Dominion, I'm sorry, the Diebold hardware which all got married together and it's, it's actually in these different machines. As a matter of fact, there's a and now, they've been renamed the old Smartmatic Election Management System. God changed his name somewhere along the line to General Election Management System. Dominion has something called they call their software Democracy Suite 5.5. It's all Smartmatic. It's all Smartmatic. Dominion took Smartmatic which was written in c plus plus and they just wrote c sharp, the language called c sharp. They wrote it, rewrote it as in c plus plus but it's the same module by module, line by line, it's the same software. And why that's important is, remember, that was a spun out of the CNE, the Consejo Nacional Electoral, the National Election Commission in Venezuela, which is under the thumb of Hugo Chavez and his mentor Fidel, the Venezuelan mafia, and the grand master of this strategy, doctor Jorge Rodriguez. Saying that differently in this order, that is to say that Fidel Castro and Hugo Chavez, dictators and the Venezuelan mafia and Hannibal Lecter, doctor evil of Venezuela, doctor Jorge Rodriguez, besides capturing the National Oil Company of Venezuela, captured the National Election Council of Venezuela which created a commercial go to market vehicle called SmartMatic, which through a series of corporate acquisitions and licensing agreements and divestments of of hardware of a different company, got all married together and that became the guts of these of the 3 major election systems used today, not just in the USA, but in the world. As a matter of fact, Smartmatic has a factory in Taiwan. And that factory has this one production line. And at the end of the line, the box has come off and they get the label screwed on. Are they Dominion? Are they Heart? Are they ES and S? But it's from one factory in Taiwan and just these different brand names. And but with all this Venezuelan junk software in it integrated into this hardware. And why that should be especially concerning is that production line isn't really manufacturing those computers. It's just assembling them out of components and the components come from the most important components come from a factory 60 miles outside of Beijing in mainland communist China. And that means they're under the those components are brought into are brought into the system, are brought into the factory in Taiwan in Taiwan and which just assembles them. And that is means it's all under the thumb of Xi Jinping, emperor for life of China. And why the US government doesn't know this besides being indolent or corrupt or indolent and corrupt is these companies have been lying about their supply chain. Smartmatic has been lying about its supply chain and how they get away with it is Iran, the mullahs of Iran play a role and they act as paymasters. So wherever so they keep certain payments that would reveal this. They keep out of the banking system and out of the swift system so you can't see it. And it's done through a transfer pricing mechanism run through Iran in oil. So if one guy needs to make a $10,000,000 payment to another agent in the supply chain instead of one wiring the other money which could all be seen in the international banking system, transfer pricing payment systems is like Iran sells 1 party a shipload of oil at $10,000,000 less than they should charge and they sell somebody else down the supply chain, a shipload of oil at $10,000,000 more than they would normally charge and that effectively is a $10,000,000 transfer. It it creates a it's effectively a $10,000,000 transfer of wealth between the two but there's no record of it in any banking system. It just shifts that money. So, that's how the payments are managed in the supply chain and it's kept out of the eyes of the United States government. This all sounds a little hard to believe. Let me show you something doctor Jorge Rodriguez said just couple months ago in on July 28th this year, Venezuela had an election and it went kind of oddly because the polls showed them down 80 to 20. The regime only had 20% support and they just ended up sort of canceling their normal way of of lending the public see the election results as they developed and they just came out and canceled it all and said, we won 51 to 49. And all bunch of nations including 16 American Organization, OAS Nations, Organization of American States, challenged this election. The Carter Center said, FUI, Europeans, all kinds of people have said this is a fake election. Jorge Rodriguez went on television and said as follows. So what is he saying there? He's saying I think he's intimating that if any of your countries push us, Venezuelans, too hard about this, we're gonna start talking about the elections of the United States and European countries and these different, South American countries, I think what he's suggesting is he rigged them all. He rigged them all. And if you folks talk to if you push us too hard on us, we're, we got a lot we're gonna open our mouths. As a matter of fact, the in the the Organization of American States needed 18 countries to vote to take action to vote against this, not to recognize their election. 16 did vote against them. 3 or 4 abstained. And what do you know? It's just the countries, the South American countries he just named. They abstained from the vote. They sat back. So I think that was a not so veiled threat from Jorge. Do you see why I say I kinda I'm kind of intrigued by this this guy?

@AzPinkLady - AzPinkLady #SaveArizona #SaveAmerica

2 of 2 History & marriage of election systems. @pnjaban @GinaSwoboda @MaricopaGOP We need to file an emergency injunction. This must be fully investigated, exposed, vetted. If there is ANY truth to what Patrick is putting out (& there is), it is a DUTY of every politician to bring this forward & let’s get a televised SCOTUS trial, a military tribunal, a trial with a jury of technology & coding peers! @RepAndyBiggsAZ @RepGosar @RepEliCrane @RepCiscomani @RepDLesko not only are you current congressman who took an oath to protect our constitution, you are candidates with standing. We have been conquered! This information is out NOW. You can’t come back AFTER the election & call fowl! We have seen that does zero good. Please read the rest of this thread & Patrick’s https://t.co/FGDtLie2dl

@PatrickByrne - Patrick Byrne

Chapter 6 of 6: Punchline & Summary https://x.com/PatrickByrne/status/1848995236024094858/video/1

Video Transcript AI Summary
Over the last 20 years, the Venezuelan mafia, with assistance from China and Iran, has been rigging elections in 72 nations across Asia, Africa, Europe, and the Americas. This has allowed them to change the arc of history. The speaker claims to provide the backstory on Hugo Chavez, the Bolivarian Revolution, and the emergence of a Venezuelan super-cartel mafia. The speaker takes responsibility for any felonies committed and references a letter, as explained in his book "Danger Close." He states that Venezuela has put a $25,000,000 bounty on his head, a fact revealed during a legal dispute with Hunter Biden. He requests security if he is to face any legal repercussions. He urges the DOJ to reflect on whether they have similar protections. He asks "real Americans" to share the video and sign up for $5 a month at americaproject.com to help fund the unraveling of this situation. He refers to the situation as the Cuban Venezuelan conquest of the United States of America.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Okay. So here's the punch line. Here's the summary and punch line. Over the last 20 years, the Venezuelan mafia, with the assistance, direction, and funds from China and Iran, has been rigging elections at various levels from mayors and prosecutors to governors and congressmen and senators and presidents, judges in 72 nations across Asia, Africa, Europe, and the Americas. This is so Chinese. The ultimate victory is to win a victory without firing a shot. They've changed the China and the Venezuelan communist dictators have changed the arc of history across 72 nations over 20 years through this technology and we just see the world changing out from under our feet and don't understand why. That's why. So what you have learned is the backstory on Hugo Chavez of Venezuela, the 98 to 2001 Bolivarian Revolution, the 2002 counterrevolution and counter counterrevolution, the failed recall of Hugo Chavez in 2004 has turning Venezuela into pure dictatorship, the emergence of a super cartel mafia that has become the Venezuelan government, the 2 best businesses to be in in Venezuela, oil and elections and why, and who were the people behind the people behind this adventure. PS, messages to the DOJ and to real Americans. To the DOJ, first, let's save time. I take responsibilities for any felonies or active wars that may have been committed. This entire project is on me. I've got a letter. Will 12 American will 12 Americans in a jury box think that I'm covered by this letter? And if you wanna know what I mean well, I I get, if you want to know what I mean, look my up my recent book Danger Close which explains what I mean by I get a letter. I've got to have security though to come I'll come back anytime, and face face the rap for this. I gotta have security. Why? Venezuela has put a $25,000,000 bounty on my head. Can't imagine why. And I was keeping this to myself but I'm in a little legal squabble with Hunter Biden and I had to reveal this. Hunter Biden didn't show up for depositions, he insisted doing it by Zoom. So I said the same thing, I wanna do it by Zoom and they didn't wanna let me do it. And so I had to file something under seal with the court that explained that I've had 2 governments now warned me that Venezuela has a $25,000,000 bounty on my head. There's mafias all over the world looking for me. And Hunter Biden deliberately took that and his lawyer took it and filed something not under seal they quoted from it. And then so so it was filed, not under seal and then the press got it and it's been written about in Newsweek several weeks ago. So every bad guy in the world knows that there's a $25,000,000 bounty on my head. So, if you want me to come back DOJ and face the wrath for any of this, I'll be happy to. There's I get I get security. I look forward to it. But may I respectfully suggest that maybe you should reflect on whether you folks have letters. I'm the only guy on my side of the table who knows what the expression truth and reconciliation means and wants a peaceful outcome to this. I I really am. I don't so maybe you should folks should think about your your letters. Okay. Messages to real Americans, help a brother out, share this video everywhere. We got 2 weeks to make a difference. And go to americaproject.com and sign up for $5 a month. Americaproject.com. Unraveling all of this and getting to the bottom of it has cost tens of 1,000,000 of dollars. I'd like your help. It's not too much to ask. Go to americaproject.com and sign up for $5 per month. I hope you have enjoyed this tale of the Cuban Venezuelan conquest of the United States of America or Fidel and Hugo's excellent Bolivarian adventure. Thank you.
TrueNorth444
Posted - November 16, 2024 at 6:23 PM
Saved - November 16, 2024 at 7:58 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
On November 12, 2024, a report from various intelligence agencies revealed that election software is compromised with malware, leading to vote manipulation. I highlighted the deletion of over 20,000 votes in a county after Trump’s win on November 5. I questioned the integrity of officials who certified these results, calling for accountability and indictments. Additionally, I expressed frustration over the lack of action regarding missing ballots and financial discrepancies in the Pentagon. The ongoing ballot counting continues to flip races, raising concerns about election integrity.

@TrueNorth444 - True North

@elonmusk @realDonaldTrump @DonaldJTrumpJr @EricTrump On 12 November 2024, the @FBI @NSACyber @NSAGov @CIA and intelligence agencies in foreign countries collectively published a report 👉🏻PROVING👈🏻 Election software and programs are riddled with Trojans, malware, and exploits. The same Election software tied to TotalVote, Dominion, BlueCrest, the DMV (of which, CISA owns the domain), and more. In counties/states where corrupt officials allow ballots to be accepted and counted without Voter ID 🤦🏼‍♀️ FOUR DAYS AFTER Election Day - despite three weeks of EARLY VOTING- 👉🏻Races are being flipped. Trump’s win on Nov 5 has been flipped in one particular county - and over 20,000 votes were DELETED from the system. @JenEasterly falsely and knowingly deceived Americans by stating this was the “most secure election ever”. When will indictments be made against those who just certified fraud? Start with leadership within the @DHSgov @CISAgov @CISACyber and then roll down to the states involved in knowingly committing treason. That includes County Council Members who do the bidding for corrupt officials - after being shown YOUR REPORT. We The People see you.👋🏻 @america @America1stLegal @StephenM #Atlassian #Dominion #TotalVote #BlueCrest

@TrueNorth444 - True North

Ah. Is this why y’all won’t lift a finger? Someone is being paid handsomely, huh? Where’s the money? (Probably the same location as all the missing ballots.)

@WatcherGuru - Watcher.Guru

JUST IN: 🇺🇸 Pentagon unable to account for $824 billion budget, failing its 7th consecutive financial audit.

@TrueNorth444 - True North

How does this happen exactly @CISACyber (Rhetorical - we already know.) But you told your minions to CERTIFY the canvass. Officials just certified FRAUD. Isn’t that Treason? https://t.co/ftZvlu5P3N

@TrueNorth444 - True North

@CISACyber It’s not over, is it? 🤦🏼‍♀️ Ballots Ballots, everywhere. How blatant and disgusting does this have to get before Indictments are issued?

@EricLDaugh - Eric Daugherty

BREAKING: Kamala Harris may now win Bucks County, Pennsylvania after everyone thought Donald Trump would win it. New ballots are being counted for Kamala Harris and the gap is now just under 300 votes. https://t.co/eowyCOClFD

@TrueNorth444 - True North

@CISACyber Oh - another race flipped. We The People think it’s over - but it’s not. Waiting for arrests is like watching the pot boil - But the oven isn’t on because DemonCrats made sure natural gas stoves are illegal.

@EricLDaugh - Eric Daugherty

BREAKING: With the continued counting of ballots, the Democrat has just taken a lead of mere hundreds in the North Carolina Supreme Court race. Before the update comes in, the Republican holds a lead of just ~2,000 ballots. But the incoming ballots from a deep blue area will flip the race for the Democrat.

Theonlyme333
Posted - January 17, 2025 at 8:43 PM
Saved - January 17, 2025 at 8:51 PM

@Theonlyme333 - Theonlymethereis

@TrueNorth444 🎯 Also👇👇👇 https://t.co/FfvYcZO94L

@TrueNorth444 - True North

For those who are not aware: Atlassian is directly connected to Election Software. So is MSFT Azure. So is AWS. So is Barracuda—> Dominion. Atlassian was directly acknowledged as compromised by the @CIA @FBI @NSACyber and intelligence agencies worldwide, in a formal report issued 12 Nov 2024, and it dates back several years. “MoSt sEcUre ElEcTIoNs EvEr”. Nope. People who ignore this or dismiss this are ignoring breaches of National Security.

KanekoaTheGreat
Posted - February 2, 2025 at 12:43 AM
Saved - February 2, 2025 at 4:47 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I addressed @Kash_Patel, @KristiNoem, and @PamBondi about the corruption involving senior officials at the FBI, DHS, and DOJ who protected Konnech CEO Eugene Yu. Yu, who runs an election software company, stored U.S. election data on Chinese servers, allowing CCP access. Despite his arrest in 2022, the case was buried due to political bias. I plan to spotlight this issue as Trump’s team takes over in 2025, emphasizing the need for accountability for those involved in this cover-up. Catherine Engelbrecht's efforts deserve recognition.

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

Dear @Kash_Patel, @KristiNoem, and @PamBondi, As President @realDonaldTrump removes corrupt and politicized officials, remember that senior executives at the FBI, DHS, and DOJ protected Konnech CEO Eugene Yu. Yu runs an American election software company while also overseeing two CCP-funded shadow subsidiaries partnered with Huawei, China Telecom, Lenovo, and China Unicom. He stored U.S. election data on Chinese servers for some of America’s largest counties—including Los Angeles, Detroit, San Francisco, St. Louis, Denver, and Washington, D.C.—where CCP-backed engineers had access to and control over his American software. This massive breach of American election data was exposed in 2022, leading to Yu’s arrest. However, corrupt government officials and Los Angeles District Attorney George Gascon buried the case simply because the investigation was initiated by the Trump supporter behind 2000 Mules. If you’re skeptical of these claims, check the domain registration history of hongzhengtech[.]cn, which provides election software to over 430 National People's Congresses across 20 Chinese provinces and is partnered with China’s largest state-owned tech companies. That domain was originally registered to admin@konnech[.]com—Yu’s email address at his Michigan-based election software company. As President Trump’s team assumes control of the federal government in 2025, one of my top priorities is to bring this story back into the national spotlight. Catherine Engelbrecht (@TrueTheVote) was right about Konnech and deserves recognition for her dedication to protecting our country. Gascon and the senior government officials who covered this up must be held accountable. The thread below provides extraordinary details. President Trump’s admin has an explosive case of corrupt FBI, DHS, and DOJ officials betraying U.S. national security to stop President Trump—gift-wrapped on a silver platter. The American people must understand just how deep this corruption goes, and there may be no better case to expose it.

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

KONNECH #1🚨: Evidence shockingly suggests that the FBI is shielding two firms closely tied to the Chinese government, which have financed and developed an American election software company for the past 15 years, all while transferring confidential election data back to China. https://t.co/4yN3XJ9TKf

_KrisHunter_
Posted - February 2, 2025 at 10:12 AM
Saved - February 2, 2025 at 5:28 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Washoe County's election equipment is still tracked by Konnech software, raising concerns about corruption in the state's election process. The CEO, Eugene Yu, has ties to Chinese companies and stored U.S. election data on Chinese servers, allowing foreign access to sensitive information. Despite his arrest in 2022, the case was buried by corrupt officials. I believe this issue needs to be highlighted again as part of exposing deep-rooted corruption. Additionally, I've found that Google Analytics and Microsoft Azure are also involved, suggesting further complicity.

@_KrisHunter_ - KrisHunter

Washoe County's election equipment and software inventory is still tracked using Konnech software (as of July 16, 2024). This is why Washoe County's election faced controversy surrounding their 2024 election. They are criminally corrupted in all branches of the state government.

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

Dear @Kash_Patel, @KristiNoem, and @PamBondi, As President @realDonaldTrump removes corrupt and politicized officials, remember that senior executives at the FBI, DHS, and DOJ protected Konnech CEO Eugene Yu. Yu runs an American election software company while also overseeing two CCP-funded shadow subsidiaries partnered with Huawei, China Telecom, Lenovo, and China Unicom. He stored U.S. election data on Chinese servers for some of America’s largest counties—including Los Angeles, Detroit, San Francisco, St. Louis, Denver, and Washington, D.C.—where CCP-backed engineers had access to and control over his American software. This massive breach of American election data was exposed in 2022, leading to Yu’s arrest. However, corrupt government officials and Los Angeles District Attorney George Gascon buried the case simply because the investigation was initiated by the Trump supporter behind 2000 Mules. If you’re skeptical of these claims, check the domain registration history of hongzhengtech[.]cn, which provides election software to over 430 National People's Congresses across 20 Chinese provinces and is partnered with China’s largest state-owned tech companies. That domain was originally registered to admin@konnech[.]com—Yu’s email address at his Michigan-based election software company. As President Trump’s team assumes control of the federal government in 2025, one of my top priorities is to bring this story back into the national spotlight. Catherine Engelbrecht (@TrueTheVote) was right about Konnech and deserves recognition for her dedication to protecting our country. Gascon and the senior government officials who covered this up must be held accountable. The thread below provides extraordinary details. President Trump’s admin has an explosive case of corrupt FBI, DHS, and DOJ officials betraying U.S. national security to stop President Trump—gift-wrapped on a silver platter. The American people must understand just how deep this corruption goes, and there may be no better case to expose it.

@_KrisHunter_ - KrisHunter

Gosh in this pretty little picture I have http://vote4fresno.com http://vote4boston.com http://vote4fairfax.com http://lavote.net http://washoe.publication.net It's a good thing our cybersecurity CISA and the rest of our intelligence agencies have their shit together because they were there to make sure China had complete and utter access to everything that they wanted without disruption.

Los Angeles County RR/CC Los Angeles County Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk - Providing essential services in a fair, accessible, and transparent manner. lavote.gov
Домен не привязан к хостингу washoe.publication.net

@_KrisHunter_ - KrisHunter

So I'm pretty sure there's nothing on this page that would cause anybody to question anything especially if it has a US city in it or a dot CN at the end right I'm so fucking pissed these people must be prosecuted. I love the one down to the bottom says lavote.net/secured/pollwo… , like that's real secure. LMAO

@_KrisHunter_ - KrisHunter

Every election investigation I've conducted has revealed two common elements: Google Analytics and Microsoft Azure. Their involvement is akin to the CIA's, suggesting complicity in the corruption. This likely won't surprise most people.

HolaBackupFiJC
Posted - February 23, 2025 at 6:07 AM
Saved - February 23, 2025 at 7:14 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I firmly believe that the claims made are completely untrue. I mention various entities and organizations, including Kleiner Perkins, JDCA, Gandi SAS, and others, to highlight the connections and implications surrounding these assertions.

@HolaBackupFiJC - HolaBackup

Patently false. Both counts. Kleiner Perkins. JDCA (UJA/Mossad). Gandi SAS (Montefiore/GCHQ). Arena. http://Impactive.io. Pegasus. Serbia Broadband. Dragoljub Spasojević. Y Combinator. Data Council. Civis Analytics. Scytl. Smartmatic. SGO Corp. BC Partners. Akamai (Sayeret Matkal). Dominion. Hamilton Place Strategies (Penta). K2 Integrity.

Impactive | All-in-One Digital Organizing Suite Impactive is an all-in-one suite of tools for organizing, outreach, and engagement. We empower progressive campaigns and causes to fundraise, share their stories and actions, get out the vote, and much more. Impactive has a long history of building movements online: Biden/Harris 2020, Planned Parenthood, Community Change, and over 1,000 other partners sent more than 150 million messages during the 2020 election cycle. impactive.io

@polyfraggrenade - moo (GO BIRDS!!!)

Through the ballot box and voting machines? Neither. Through the media? They all are. 2020 was largely decided by the media, like Twitter, which deliberately censored the President, and the news. It's why Elon bought Twitter; to influence public opinion.

@Junesaya_ - Anti-poll Action

@polyfraggrenade Was the 2020 or 2024 election rigged??

RichardEntuboca
Posted - May 31, 2025 at 6:07 PM
Saved - May 31, 2025 at 6:11 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared a fun fact about Jamie Gorelick, the current or former Co-Chair of the DHS Advisory Council, highlighting their connection to Fannie Mae fraud and Palantir. I also noted the oddity of Apple removing my ability to search my archives again, but I still have the evidence. I commented on the DHSAC's strategic partnerships and expressed my disappointment in still having receipts related to election fraud and various organizations. Lastly, I found humor in the CNBC CEO Councils, calling it a flawless victory.

@RichardEntuboca - Richard Entuboca

*FUN FACT* JAMIE GORELICK DHSAC, Co-Chair The current or immediate former Co-Chair of the DHS ADVISORY COUNCIL is one of the bigger FANNIE MAE FRAUDSTERS of ALL-TIME. So naturally, it makes sense they’d be partnering up with @PalantirTech right now, because Palantir is one of the biggest frauds and crime scenes of all-time. It also makes sense that Apple would suddenly remove my ability to run keyword searches within my own archives… AGAIN. (You did it on my previous device too.🖕) No matter. Got those receipts anyways too.

@RichardEntuboca - Richard Entuboca

It can take even longer to cover it up, amirite?

@FannieMae - Fannie Mae

ICYMI this week — Fannie Mae announced a new AI partnership with @PalantirTech to help root out mortgage fraud in our housing system. This never-before-seen technology will take fraud detection time down from months to seconds. @pulte https://spr.ly/6017NfIO9

Video Transcript AI Summary
A partnership with Palantir aims to address mortgage fraud. The partnership has only scratched the surface of what is possible. Previously, it took investigators sixty days to detect fraud; Palantir's technology accomplishes the same task in ten seconds. Palantir understands security and rooting up fraud. The partnership considers this a matter of public trust. The goal is to understand the fraud and stop it. The partnership intends to get to the bottom of mortgage fraud.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We're here to announce a very exciting partnership with Palantir to help us address mortgage fraud. Speaker 1: What better way in business to run than make sure there's no fraud? I think we have really scratched the surface with Palantir. Speaker 0: It took really talented investigators sixty days to detect fraud in these files. It took your technology ten seconds. Like, holy cow. Speaker 1: He knows all about security, about rooting up fraud, you name it. We couldn't be more happy to have your technology. For us at Palantir, I think this is a matter of public trust. Speaker 0: We're gonna be able to understand the fraud and stop it in its tracks. Speaker 1: We're gonna get to the bottom of mortgage fraud. The sky's the limit.
Fannie Mae Launches AI Fraud Detection Technology Partnership with Palantir | Fannie Mae Fannie Mae announced the launch today of its AI-powered Crime Detection Unit in partnership with leading AI software company Palantir. fanniemae.com

@RichardEntuboca - Richard Entuboca

As a matter of fact, that entire DHSAC and its “strategic partnerships” makes sense.🤦🏻‍♂️ https://t.co/u9gLWYhBf3

@RichardEntuboca - Richard Entuboca

It’s a real shame I still had these election fraud, BC Partners, IQT, WestExec, BCG, CNAS, The Asia Group, Serbia Broadband, Dominion and TENEO receipts. A real shame. https://t.co/EFomQM6NXa

@RichardEntuboca - Richard Entuboca

El. Oh. Fucking. El. https://t.co/pnsLdOovmu

@RichardEntuboca - Richard Entuboca

CNBC CEO COUNCILS (lmbo) Flawless. Victory. Fatality. https://t.co/rR3p3r7ac7

TheSCIF
Posted - October 26, 2025 at 10:06 PM
Saved - December 11, 2025 at 8:04 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I claim the 2020 Presidential Election was rigged and stolen—a far bigger SCANDAL, with Democrats, USAID, AWEB, the CCP, left-wing billionaires, Big Tech, Smartmatic, Dominion, fake IDs, fake ballots, rigged software and machines, etc. "WE KNOW EVERYTHING." — President Trump

@TheSCIF - The SCIF

"The 2020 Presidential Election, being rigged and stolen, is a far bigger SCANDAL." The Democrats, USAID, AWEB, the CCP, left-wing billionaires, Big Tech, Smartmatic, Dominion, fake IDs, fake ballots, rigged election software and machines, etc., are all involved. "WE KNOW EVERYTHING." - President Trump

Video Transcript AI Summary
The discussion centers on allegations of foreign and domestic interference in the 2020 U.S. election and related vulnerabilities in mail-in voting. - A 2020 FBI intelligence memo warned that China might have been sending fake driver’s licenses into the U.S. to create fake mail-in ballots intended to help Joe Biden win. The memo, reportedly corroborated by licenses intercepted by U.S. Customs and Border Protection in Chicago, was allegedly dismissed and not investigated because it would reflect badly on Trump. There are claims that intelligence reports were requested to be destroyed under federal records rules to prevent leaks before the election, as the memo allegedly indicated China preferred Joe Biden over Donald Trump. - A 60 Minutes segment quoted the head of Homeland Security’s cyber security division stating there were no foreign intrusions in the 2020 election, which is asserted as false by the speakers, citing later indictments of Iranians in Manhattan in 2021 for interfering in the election by hacking a state database to obtain voter IDs used in a malinformation operation. - In Colorado, it is claimed that 670 Dominion passwords from 63 out of 64 counties were exposed on the secretary of state’s public website since June, and that these passwords were known to Secretary of State Jenna Griswold during a trial but not disclosed to clerks. There are accusations that this could imply compromised elections, referencing fraudulent activity in Mesa County and asserting that passwords beyond Colorado were involved with Dominion machines. Dominion’s Colorado base is noted, with a claim that Dominion also has ties to Serbia. A video referenced by Gary Brunson is suggested to support these claims about the origins of the electoral manipulation. - A video and related claims allege a connection to a 30-year CIA whistleblower and trace the origins of the alleged election manipulation to Venezuela and Hugo Chávez, tying in references to Patrick Byrne and broader alleged corruption. - The speakers assert there was a second country deeply involved in meddling in the election, with FBI involvement in August 2020 in recognizing a Chinese operation to mass-produce fake U.S. driver’s licenses and mail-in ballots to influence the election in favor of Biden, describing the operation as designed to help Biden beat Trump. Customs and Border Protection reportedly intercepted 20,000 fake driver’s licenses, corroborating the intelligence, while the Biden administration and the Chris Wray-led FBI allegedly covered this up for five years until the document was provided to Chuck Grassley by Kash Patel. - It is claimed that China viewed mail-in ballots as an enormous vulnerability during the COVID-19 pandemic, exploiting the weakness in the system, and that this concern remains for states lacking strong mail-in voting security. - Additional notes include a claim that there were tightened voting laws in several states post-2020, with increased confidence in the system where tightened; an arrest by HSI Miami and partners of a permanent resident Haitian national for unlawful voting and casting a false ballot; and estimates that 130,000 to 280,000 completed ballots were shipped from Bethpage, New York to Lancaster, Pennsylvania, with the trailer disappearing. - The final claim references tens of thousands of fake voters having illegally cast ballots in the November election, implying broad down-ballot effects across Senate, Congress, and local elections.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Twenty twenty FBI intel memo warning that China might have been sending fake driver's licenses in to create fake mail in ballots to help Joe Biden win. Last night, I got the text of the memo. Put it up for everybody so you can read it at justinnews.com. There's a busting headline in here. When the FBI called this back so they have this intel. It's corroborated by licenses that are intercepted, by customs and border in, border protection in Chicago. But they call it back anyways and decide we're just not gonna investigate this because this would look good for Trump, bad for Biden. They ask all intelligence agencies to destroy the intelligence report that the FBI actually sent them as a federal records act. You're not supposed to do that. But they wanted it destroyed. Why? Because they probably didn't want it to leak out before the election that China preferred Joe Biden over Donald Trump. Sixty minutes aired a piece with the head of the homeland security, cyber security division saying there were no foreign intrusions in the twenty twenty election. It was a perfectly clean election, he said. I think it was Chris Krebs was his name. We now know that to have been a false proclamation. First, we know a year later in '21, a bunch of Iranians were indicted in Manhattan on charges that they interfered in the election and hacked into a state database to obtain voter IDs and use them in a malinfluence operation against the American election. Speaker 1: We did subpoena Mike Frontera, Dominion's Dominion's lawyer, but they found a way to not let us have our witnesses. What Jenna did, though, that since at least June, those bios passwords, 670 of them from 63 counties out of the 64 counties in Colorado have been on the public website for the secretary's state, which means they were out there for anybody to grab. Hey. She should be locked up, and they should throw away the key and let me loose. Speaker 2: Yeah. We need a prisoner swap. Speaker 1: Yeah. Speaker 2: Yeah. For sure. So so you think that this election in Colorado was definitely compromised because of the leaked passwords? Speaker 1: Oh, always. There is mean, in Mesa County, there were they were finding fraudulent ballots. They were finding the same person was signing the ballot envelopes, and they brushed it off like it was nothing. As a matter of fact, what Jenna Griswold did with the passwords, she knew while I was going through the trial that that was out there and did nothing. Speaker 2: So those passwords were leaked out there during your trial before your sentencing? Speaker 1: They were out there since June, but she knew about it and didn't tell the clerks about it. And now she's apologizing to the clerks. She should apologize to the American people or at least the people in Colorado. But there are other passwords besides just for Colorado, I've heard, for The The United States in there for Dominion machines. Speaker 2: So you think some of our other elections in other states could be compromised because of leaked passwords for Dominion machines? Speaker 1: Absolutely. Absolutely. That's what's going on with the cartel in Arizona and Michigan. And, you know, I was so happy when I saw Florida for Trump and all these other places. But just remember, Dominion's headquarters is in Colorado, Denver, Colorado. Yes. And, also, most people don't know that Dominion is out of Serbia as well. And then when you and if you could play that video Mhmm. By Gary Brunson Speaker 3: Yeah. Speaker 1: The thirty year CIA whistleblower, you will or or look at the transcript, you'll see exactly how this all started with Hugo Chavez at Venezuela. And that's why this stuff with Patrick Byrne and all this coming out, it leads all the way back to Venezuela and then the corruption worldwide. Speaker 0: Now we know there was a second country that was more deeply involved in meddling into the election. The FBI in August 2020, so three and a half months before the votes votes were cast that put Joe Biden in the presidency, that FBI believed that China had begun a mass operation to produce fake US driver's license them, move them to The United States, and have Chinese citizens here on our side, both legally and illegally, go out and get fake mail in ballots and vote to try to elect Joe Biden. By the way, the FBI intelligence says this Chinese operation from a Chinese intelligence source that the FBI was handling was designed to help Joe Biden beat Donald Trump. It's very important. That was the intention. Speaker 4: Sensational video and photo evidence has emerged exposing a factory in Guangdong producing 500,000 blank American ballots. The Gateway Pundit, an online news publication confirmed that the video was provided by Vanessa a Olividas, a third generation member of the Chinese Communist Party. Finesse tweeted on November 9 that the printing plant in Guangdong, China was printing out fake ballots, which were then mailed to Canada and Mexico under the name of medical supplies between August 2020 and from there flown into The United States. The release video of the phone call to a Chinese manufacturer requesting a bulk order of fake US 20 '20 ballots has been revealed by the Gateway Pundit. Here is the translated recording between the caller and the ballot printing company. Speaker 0: The intelligence was strong enough to send out to all of the intelligence agencies and then a few days later, it was called back on the auspices that they wanted to re interview source. Now the source was re interviewed a second time, stuck to his story. In the meantime, the customs and border patrol, border protection agency intercepted 20,000 of these fake drivers IDs, essentially corroborating the intelligence. But the Biden administration Wow. The Chris Ray FBI, they simply covered this up. And for five years, we were kept in the dark until this intelligence document was sent last night to Chuck Grassley from Kash Patel. China saw mail in ballots as an enormous vulnerability during the COVID nineteen pandemic because and I you know, our enemies look for weaknesses, not for strengths. They don't look for the hardest thing to do. They look for the easiest thing to do to us. That is a warning sign. Now lots have happened since 2020, and with all of the voter ID and other things, we've tightened up laws in several states. And where we've tightened up the laws in the states, people vote more because they have greater confidence in the system. But China saw this as an exploitable operation, and, I think that should concern all of us. In any state that doesn't have their mail in voting to the proximal best security measures, there's a foreign enemy looking to exploit it right now. Speaker 3: This morning, HSI Miami along with our state and federal partners, FDLE, DSS, and USCIS arrested a permanent resident who is Haitian national and a convicted aggravated felon. He was arrested for unlawful voting and casting a false ballot. Speaker 5: This evidence demonstrates, and it's through eyewitness testimony that's been corroborated by others through their eyewitness statements, that a 130,000 to 280,000 completed ballots for the twenty twenty general election were shipped from Bethpage, New York to Lancaster, Pennsylvania, where those ballots and the trailer in which they were shipped disappeared. Speaker 6: At this point in time, we have already confirmed tens tens of thousands of fake voters of illegally cast ballots, and I'm speaking about the November. And think of how that would affect the down voting down ballot voting also. We're talking senators, congressmen, local elections. It's affecting all of the ballots.
TheSCIF
Posted - April 1, 2026 at 8:20 PM
Saved - April 1, 2026 at 8:29 PM

@TheSCIF - The SCIF

Dominion's foreign ties to the CCP and Serbia. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out that our elections are rigged and have major foreign involvement. https://t.co/2YzStlWTyF

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: The election was stolen. A graph shows people who worked for ES&S, Hart, Dominion Voting Systems, ClearBallot, and Smartmatic, recycling through companies. People who worked at Dominion Voting Systems are entering the political sphere and taking over election offices; one county in Texas, after hiring someone who worked for Dominion, went blue for the first time. The speaker walks through information: Dominion using “Serbian technology with Chinese characteristics.” Huawei Bank is involved; there’s no public board saying Bank of China funds anything, but research on Roaming Networks—a relatively unknown Serbian company until 2013—shows it signed a value-added contract with Huawei Bank. Huawei is “the Bank of China.” Roaming Networks built ICT infrastructure and data centers in Serbia, with owner Nenad Kovac identified as the enterprise partner. Some Roaming Networks information may come off their site after this presentation. Dominion Voting Systems has a corporate office in Serbia; a screenshot of the office and a developer on their site is noted. A Serbian legislative leader said, “I know Dominion Voting Systems back in November. They have an office here.” Dominion started rapidly removing Serbian coders from their site/LinkedIn. Code is built in Serbia for a system used in the United States, using infrastructure funded by China, not just China but the Bank of China. A slide discusses Dominion’s enterprise partnership with Huawei, added to the restricted list on 05/16/2019. Roaming Networks references show Dominion Voting Systems using a pure flash storage solution in Dominion’s data center. A photo of Sacramento shows Dominion hardware coming from China, with a bill of lading from a Chinese supplier to Dominion’s McKinney, Texas office. Testing and approval of Dominion hardware show similarities with Smartmatic; the same hardware with different branding. They claim a “tail” behind the scenes—evidence of connections among ES&S, Hart, Dominion, ClearBallot, Smartmatic, with people cycling through these companies. People who once worked at Dominion are now entering election offices; in Texas, a county that hired a former Dominion employee “went blue” by accident with ES&S involved. The speaker calls out Gina Griswold for commenting on Tina Peters and Mesa, and Matt Crane’s role as Arapahoe County clerk and recorder, now head of the County Clerks Association; Crane’s wife previously worked for Dominion and Sequoia Voting Systems. The speaker asserts a public breach of trust requires an audit; if there’s nothing to hide, audits should restore trust. They argue, whether Dominion is the bad actor or not, removal of logs, altering code, and a “trusted build” are problematic, and emphasize the need for audits and investigations to restore trust in elections. Speaker 1: Indicators: a senior Dominion vice president’s name appears on patents; a software engineer involved in the Wayne County, Michigan tabulation center is connected to the software. Coincidences accumulate, suggesting there is a preponderance of evidence with affidavits across the country. The speaker asks which computer produced certain files analyzed yesterday; whether it came from the central count or precincts. Speaker 0: Answers with a non-answer, noting they imaged the main EMS and the tabulation system; servers in the county coordinate precinct information and house audit reports, cast vote reports, error reports, adjudication reports, and access logs. Thumb drives can contaminate the county and state systems if connected to a machine; it’s not unique to Dominion or voting systems but a general risk. They emphasize avoiding white noise and focusing on facts: Dominion is in Serbia; Huawei Bank funds the enterprise partnership and Serbia-based data centers; code is written in Serbia; imaging shows fingerprints of this. They call for audits, note deviations in Georgia (ballots appearing identical in different batches, a shredder truck before January 20 in Georgia, and a leaky arena water claim later proven to be a leaky toilet), and point to media silence. They argue against accepting the gold standard claim and highlight perceived connections to Soros-funded groups. They stress deviations in state and county behavior, urge audits, and compare the election system to a serial killer—unacceptable to let foreign systems run it. Speaker 2: Adds that with 100 indicators, a pattern emerges; reiterates the need to examine which files came from which computer, and questions the integrity of the central count. Speaker 3: Notes the risk of a non-internet-connected thumb drive introducing malware; emphasizes auditing all machines for that reason.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You don't have to be a rocket scientist to figure out that the election was stolen. We were able to build an entire graph of the people that worked for ES and S, Hart, Dominion Voting Systems, ClearValot, Smartmatic, and they basically recycle people through the company. But one of the other things that's become very telling is that you have people that worked at Dominion Voting Systems that are now entering the political sphere and taking over election offices. And then coincidentally enough, you have those election offices for the first time, one in Texas, that that county after hiring someone that worked for Dominion Voting Systems went blue. Alright. So I'm gonna walk you through some information. So we talk about Dominion being, how we take Serbian technology with Chinese characteristics. There nobody's gonna come out and tell you that the Bank of China is is funding anything. They're not gonna do it. Right? They're not gonna come out and put a big board up and say that that's what's happened. But what we're able to do is, do some research on a company called Roaming Networks. So it was a relatively unknown, company out of Serbia until 2013. They signed a value added contract with Huawei Bank. So Huawei, just so you know, is the Bank of China. There'll be some information at the end of the slide that will tell you a little more information about them, But they were built out ICT infrastructure and data centers, and they had done some of that information for or some of that build for most of Serbia. So it's May it's basically the infrastructure of Serbia. I said basically because it doesn't fully encapsulate it, but they have a great impact in Serbia. And it talks about their strategic partnerships and who the owner is. So it's run by an oligarch named Nenad Kovac. And so he was selected as the enterprise partner. Now if you go to roaming networks, you'll see this information on their website. Some of it. Some of this information. Cause I assume that after that this presentation is done, some of that will come down off their website. So we did some research on Dominion Voting Systems. Dominion Voting Systems has a corporate office located in Serbia. We took an screenshot, the Google screenshot of the office that's there and one of the developers, which you'll find on the website. You'll know that you'll notice that one of the legislative leaders inside of Serbia said, I know Dominion Voting Systems back in November. They have an office here. Right? And so Dominion very quickly started taking off all of the Serbian coders that they had on on their website or on LinkedIn. The the interesting thing about this is that we're having code built in Serbia for a system that's used in The United States that uses infrastructure that is actually built by or funded by China. And not just China, but the Bank of China. And I'm gonna show you that I wanna remind you of something about Huawei Bank, right, or Huawei, and that is it's restricted in The United States of doing business in The United States. You cannot do business with them in The United States from 2019. You can't do business with enterprise partners from 2019. So by proxy, they're doing business with the Bank of China through this kind of web of business relationships. So this is a slide that talks about becoming an enterprise partner. Right? And you can kind of look or excuse me. This is a slide that talks about when Huawei was added to the restricted list on 05/16/2019. Many of you guys actually remember that. Right? You remember that at all? Bank of China? Okay. This right here is the information related to many voting systems using roaming networks. So over here on the far left, this is the references that were that were displayed by roaming networks on their site stating that the implementation of pure flash storage solution on the primary data or sorry, data center for Dominion Voting Systems. So you have the company which is funded in partnership by Huawei of China that is actually building the data centers for Dominion Voting Systems, building the code in the office in Serbia. Remember what I talked to you about yesterday, which is deviations. Right? A deviation should give you enough evidence that you just say the breach of the public trust has happened. We need to have an audit. And by the way, if there's nothing to hide, then why would we not have an audit? Why? So that's the first one which shows that they have as a reference Dominion Voting. If you move to the to the right side, this is a picture taken by Mark Cook in Sacramento, California election warehouse where you can see the dominating voting system, hardware is coming directly from China. Right? From China. And you would say, oh, lots of stuff is made in China. Okay. Well, then you have a bill of lading that lading that came in, and you can't really read this, but this goes from a supplier in China directly to the Dominion Voting Systems office in McKinney, Texas. Right? And then over here in this corner, you start talking about testing and approval of Dominion Voting Systems. This particular piece is actually talking about the the similarities in testing of the equipment, the hardware between Smartmatic and Dominion Voting Systems. So they're using the same hardware. They just have a new badge put on it. One says Dominion Voting, and one says Smartmatic. So look. At the end of the day, if you look behind you and you got a tail, everyone tells you you got a tail. Right? But you keep telling everyone you don't have a tail, but you got a tail hanging out there, you probably have a tail. Right? We were able to build an entire graph of the people that worked for ES and S, Hart, Dominion Voting Systems, ClearBallot, Smartmatic, and they basically recycle people through the company. But one of the other things that's become very telling is that you have people that worked at Dominion Voting Systems that are now entering the political sphere and taking over election offices. And then coincidentally enough, you have those election offices for the first time, one in Texas, that that county after hiring someone that worked for Dominion Voting Systems went blue by accident, and they had ES and S. Okay. So I wanna address something with Gina Griswold. I wanna do it right here. So Gina Griswold got on TV and talked about Tina Peters and talked about, Mesa and said that that it was, bad actors, and then they had Matt Crane get up after Gina Griswold and explain that the real heroes are the other 63 counties, that did not do a forensic imaging before and after the trusted build. And I can tell you right now that, you know, I don't know if it's Dominion itself that is the bad actor, if they have people in their company that are bad actors. But if you have nothing to hide, you don't go in and do a trusted build that includes removing logs, changing code. Right? And and and removing information and or components. Those aren't things that you do. The person that she had follow her up, and you guys are gonna be a chance to see this. There'll be lots of articles out there. The person that she had follow-up that on stage was Matt Crane. Matt Crane was the county clerk and recorder for Arapahoe County. He is now the, head of the County Clerks Association or County Clerks and Recorders Association. Right? An organization, by the way, that has some money that comes in and out of that organization that is suspect at best. But here's another thing you need know about Matt Crane who came down hard on Tina Peters. His wife worked for Dominion for many, many years. Before that, she worked for, I think, Sequoia Voting Systems. Right? Sixteen years in total. So the person standing on stage that's actually standing next to the secretary of state, Gina Gridwald, in Colorado is complicit in the behavior of what's happening all across the country saying that this is again the gold standard. If it's the gold standard, then you should do something when a public breach of trust has been done. If there's a breach of trust, it's really simple. The only way to restore that trust is to audit. Okay? You don't have to be a rocket scientist to figure out that the election was stolen. You don't. It it's a you you it's not something you have to stand out there and say, hey, maybe it was, maybe it wasn't. Put the if you if you really wanna get to the bottom of it, put the American people at ease. They were dealing with a massive fraud on the American people. I'm a I'm a I'm a realist. Right? I just want the truth. The only way we get to the truth is by doing audits make sure that they can put, you know, restore trust to the American people. Speaker 1: What what Joe's talking about is indicators. You know, you you get one indicator and that gives you one point of reference. But when you line up a 100 indicators, so another senior Dominion vice president, his name is on the patents was the tabulation center Dominion supervisor in Wayne County, Michigan. Nick Oconomachus. Yes. So Yeah. A senior VP whose names on the patents software, they use a software engineer, software designer, was running the tabulation center. So again, you know, coincidences are coincidences but a whole bunch of coincidences all of a sudden become not a coincidence. So, you just got to apply some common sense and look as Joe said, the preponderance of this this overwhelming evidence and literally, there there are legal boxes of affidavits across the country that are you know, five six feet high stacked of legal filing boxes. And one more question, Joe. Speaker 0: Yeah. Speaker 2: Yes. Yesterday afternoon, we had a really good presentation looking at some of the files, analyzing the files and say But what are they doing my question is exactly which computer did those files come from? Did that come from the central count? Did that come from a sample computer that was used in the precincts? Was that the computer that prepared the equipment that was sent to the precincts? I'm wondering exactly which computer it was where those files were were found. So Speaker 0: I'm gonna answer that with a non answer because I don't have enough information on what systems they image, but they were imaging the main EMS and the tabulation system. Speaker 1: But Yes. And according to the the election supervisor who was here, those and she observed those image. Those were the server images before and after the Dominion software upgrade. So that was a server. Speaker 0: Yes. Speaker 1: The MS server. Yeah. Speaker 0: There were the servers. Two of them. Speaker 1: So the server is where at a county level you coordinate all the precinct information and that server is the repository for all the the audit functions, all the cast vote reports, the error reports, the adjudication reports, the the logs, all the access logs. Everything that happens in that little ecosystem goes through that server. So, it's it's a central brain. Is that is that a way central brain for that county and it's got every everything that happened all throughout the county should be in that repository for that that county right there. Correct. Yes. Yeah. You Speaker 3: can load them out. You can if you pull it thank you. If you pull a thumb drive or put a thumb drive into one machine Yeah. That's not connected to the Internet and then you get the results from it. Upload that thumb drive into the county wide machine. If one machine has a malicious virus in it or you know some kind of malware, you can now upload it to the entire county machine and corrupt the county and the same thing again to the state. And I'm wondering if you I want to check that. I heard this the guys Yeah. So not Speaker 0: that's not a that's not unique to voting systems. That's not unique in Dominion voting systems or any. If you have a corrupted information or a virus on any thumb drive and you put it in any computer, it can corrupt that computer and anything that touches that would also be corrupted. Yes. Speaker 3: Okay. This is if it's in the one machine and the thumb drive, it would jump to the thumb drive at that point. Speaker 0: It possibly could do that. Yes. Okay. Speaker 3: Yeah. That's a problem. We need to audit all the machines for that reason. Speaker 0: That's Yes. So I I want to be really careful and speak truth, and and the truth is that that is a possibility. But we don't wanna come up with possibilities. We wanna eliminate all of the white noise and get down to the real facts. Right? This is facts. Like, we know this a fact that Dominion Voting Systems is in Serbia. We know that Huawei is the bank that that is funding as a as a, enterprise partner and organization in Serbia that's doing business that built their data center in Serbia. We know the code was written in Serbia. You can see some of that. Even the fingerprints of that when you do the imaging. Thank you for what you do. Yeah. Thank you. That we have to look at deviations. We have to look at ways in which they violate law. We have to look at ways in which they have behavioral deviations. And I'll use Georgia as an example. We know that we had video of somebody putting, ballots through the system multiple times. When they went to go do an audit of those images, what did they discover? They discovered that there was ballots that were identical in different batches. That's a that's a that happened. That would happen nine months later, but have they said anything about has the media even let that get out? No. We know that there was a shredder truck that showed up before January 20 in Georgia. We know that for a fact. Right? I have pictures of somebody hiding in a bush, taking pictures of it being surrounded by FBI agents and other people from the government. So they knew that there was a problem and that there was a shredder truck filled with ballots, and you were told nothing. We know that they in the in the main center, the what the arena, they said that there was a main water leak. It was parroted across main the mainstream media. That was parroted. I'm not everything that I'm telling you is something you can go do your own research on. It turned out to be a leaky toilet. They shut down an arena for a leaky toilet, deviation of behavior. We all we have to do is look at the basic deviations from state to state. It it doesn't take a mathematician. It doesn't take doctor Frank or Seth or Bobby Peyton or any of those people to understand that these things are dishonest acts. And yet they tell us it's a gold standard. It's the safest election in US history. You can also take the people that stood up against the election and what they're doing today. Some of them work for the same organizations that are funded by Soros and other aristocratic elites. This isn't again me making it up. It's very simple to see. There was a deviation in our state, in our county, in our area of behavior, law, code. And if there's a if there's a deviation of code or the deviation of a build for dominion in one state and it comes out like it did in Antrim County and now you have Mesa County, that those were compromised systems and that they erased information that by federal law, you have to keep for twenty two months, that should be all that should be the end of the conversation. There shouldn't be a debate about it. We spend all of this time going back and forth about, well, did this happen This happened? We we get to the transaction, and we don't look at it holistically as, listen. I I'm I'm not gonna I'm not gonna let my daughter date a serial killer. And you say, well, he seems like a nice guy. The fact that he's a serial killer, he's not gonna let him date your daughter. Why are we letting our why are we letting our election system get run by systems that are foreign systems?
View Full Interactive Feed