reSee.it - Related Post Feed

KanekoaTheGreat
Posted - May 20, 2023 at 8:55 PM
Saved - May 21, 2023 at 5:25 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Concerning levels of DNA contamination have been found in Pfizer and Moderna vaccines, including Simian Virus 40 (SV40) promoters linked to cancer development in humans. The vaccines contain double-stranded DNA contamination, which can integrate into the genome and drive aggressive gene expression. The SV40 promoter is present in Pfizer vaccines and is known to cause increased expression of genes that can drive cancer. The sequence is unnecessary for producing the mRNA vaccine and should be removed. Researchers are running assays to determine how much of this DNA is present after vaccination.

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

Microbiologist Kevin McKernan discovered concerning levels of DNA contamination in Pfizer and Moderna vials, including Simian Virus 40 (SV40) promoters tied to cancer development in humans: "It's in both Moderna and Pfizer. We looked at the bivalent vaccines for both Moderna and Pfizer and only the monovalent vaccines for Pfizer because we didn't have access to monovalent vaccines for Moderna. In all three cases, the vaccines contain double-stranded DNA contamination. If you sequence that DNA, you'll find that it matches what looks to be an expression vector that's used to make the RNA... Whenever we see DNA contamination, like from plasmids, ending up in any injectable, the first thing people think about is whether there's any E. coli endotoxin present because that creates anaphylaxis for the injected. And, of course, your viewers and listeners are probably aware there's a lot of anaphylaxis going on, not only on TV but in the VAERS database. You can see people get injected with this and drop. That could be the background from this E. coli process of manufacturing the DNA... At least on the Pfizer side of things, it has what's known as an SV40 promoter. This is an oncogenic virus piece. It's not the entire virus. However, the small piece is known to drive very aggressive gene expression. And the concern that people, even at the FDA, have noted in the past whenever injecting double-stranded DNA is that these things can then integrate into the genome. If you're not careful with how you manufacture these things, and you have excess amounts of this DNA, your concern for genome integration goes up... If you get an SV40 promoter in front of an oncogene, you will end up with a high expression of a gene that can drive cancer, it will be a very rare event, but you don't need many of these cells to be hit with something like this for it to take off. SV40 actually plagued, granted it was the full viral genome, not just the promoter, but this has plagued previous vaccine programs. The polio vaccine is one of them that they were concerned that this may have contributed to cancer from that vaccine. So there's a history of being concerned over SV40. Having the promoter inside some of these vectors isn't necessary. It seems to be superfluous oversight they could have eliminated, yet it's still there because they ran this out the door so quickly, they didn't really have time to get rid of superfluous parts of the plasmid. So, that piece of DNA is something we really need to pay attention to. We've made quantitative PCR assays to hunt for this. So several researchers around the globe are now running these assays to look for how much of this DNA is floating around after people have been vaccinated." @Kevin_McKernan @RMConservative

Video Transcript AI Summary
Kevin McKernan, Chief Science Officer and Founder of Medicinal Genomics, discusses his research on DNA plasmids found in Moderna and Pfizer COVID-19 vaccines. The DNA contamination in the vaccines is concerning due to potential long-term effects and the risk of genome integration. McKernan highlights the lack of quality control and transparency in the manufacturing process. He also raises concerns about the potential for prothrombotic effects and the presence of an oncogenic virus promoter in the DNA. McKernan emphasizes the need for further research and replication of his findings to better understand the extent of DNA contamination in the vaccines.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Now, a couple months ago, I read an article to you about research that was done that actually tried to take a look at these vials and test them for contaminants. And one of them by our next guest, Kevin McKernan, seem to find these DNA plasmids left over as kind of the, you know, because mRNA as the byproduct of of this DNA sequencing. And they found levels in there that are very concerning, that raised concerns about the long term ability to produce more, you know, spike protein factories. And just the fact that there's zero concern to engage in any quality control. But it was highly technical, and obviously I'm not qualified to talk about it. So we have with us the the author of that study Kevin McKernan himself. He's chief science officer and founder of Medicinal Genomics. He has many years of experience in revolutionary sequencing technologies. So again, he's well versed in gene therapy. He's a microbiologist, an expert in gene decoding. He's done important work on studying DNA contamination in these COVID shots. So nobody is more qualified to explain this in in plain language than Kevin himself. So with no further ado, Kevin, it is a true honor to bring you here for the first time to Blaze Media. Speaker 1: Oh, thank you for having me, Daniel. It's an important topic because I think the vast majority of the public is not aware of how slipshod the manufacturing is on these vaccines. Speaker 0: Show So could you explain Obviously, people by now, at least my audience, understands the mRNA and the dangers and all of the safety signals we've seen from them. We we now have 35 100 case studies, running the gamut about 24 different organ systems and health conditions. But you discovered DNA plasmids in Moderna's vials. Could you just take as much time as you need to explain, you know, why you looked at this, what are plasmids, how they get in there, and and why they're concerning. Speaker 1: Certainly. So there is in both Moderna and Pfizer's, and we looked at, the bivalent vaccines and the for both Moderna Pfizer and only the monovalent vaccines for Pfizer. We didn't have access to monovalents for Moderna. But, in all 3 cases of Pfizer's monovalent and bivalents and Moderna's bivalents, there is double stranded DNA contamination in in the vaccines. If you sequence that DNA, you'll find that it matches, what looks to be an expression vector that's used to make the RNA. So in order for these folks to scale up the synthesis of these mRNAs to hit billions of arms, They had to change the manufacturing mid trial. So actually halfway through the trials that were all given these fictitious numbers of 95% efficacy, They changed the method of manufacturing these to from from chemical synthesis of the RNA to manufacturing them inside E. Coli. So they get E. Coli to absorb a DNA plasmid, which expresses many, many copies of the DNA. So they first want lots of copies of DNA that they can then transcribe RNA off of that DNA. Nicole, I agree at doing this. She put a plasmid in there. It makes a couple of copies of the plasmid. They replicate every 20 minutes. So overnight, you can get billions, if not trillions, of of Xerox copies of the template you need to make this RNA from. The challenge is getting rid of that RNA and getting that RNA, Speaker 0: and DNA. Kevin, let's slow it down. You're really smart. I want everyone to understand this, so let's take it each tranche at a time. So before we talk about the problem, you're just saying the rationale for even using DNA, the fact is, where do you get the mRNA strands from that are numerous enough that you could scale up to what was it? I mean, there's several billions Billions Speaker 1: of arms. Yeah. Billions of shots. Speaker 0: Billions of arms. You know, 13,000,000,000 doses or something in that ballpark between all of them. I mean, that that includes AstraZeneca, but we're talking about 1,000,000,000. So you're saying, forget about, you know, science for a minute, it's a manufacturing issue, so that's where the science comes in, and you're saying that e coli plasmids were the best vectors for that? Speaker 1: Yes. Those are the easiest things to grow. If you need to grow grams to kilograms amounts of DNA, it gets done In the E. Coli. Now, there are challenges in growing things in E. Coli is that you have to get your DNA out of the E. Coli, and also get rid of the DNA when you're done making RNA. And those 2 steps are areas that I think are lacking a lot of, Transparency. When when you wanna get DNA out of E. Coli and you crack open the E. Coli to get it, you have now, contaminated your DNA with all types of endotoxin from the actual e coli. Now, pharma should be testing for endotoxin levels, but all the EMA documents and and other FOIA requests people put forward, it's not clear to me how they're testing for that, or what levels they're, they're they're finding. Whenever we see DNA contamination, like from plasmids ending up in any injectable, the first thing people think about is whether there's any E. Coli endotoxin Not only on TV, but like in the various database. You can see people get injected with this and this drop. That could be background from this E. Coli manufacturing the DNA. So that's a separate topic in LPSO and endotoxin. I don't wanna go into that just yet, but just getting enough of this DNA to make the RNA is Challenge, and they had to change midstream in their in their trial, to ramp up production. And so the trial is actually somewhat confounded with the fact that some of the participants in the trial were were given 1 manufacturing method, and other ones were given this plasmid based manufacturing, which is, I think is something you'll see more more and more news on in in the coming coming weeks. Speaker 0: So so you tested and you're thinking, wait a minute, who's to say you got out the DNA that you, know, use to to formulate it. It's not a perfect analogy, but I picture, you know, if you wanna make egg salad, there's nothing more disgusting than eating shells in the eggs. So you gotta make sure you get out the shell. And, you know, if you want the eggs, you you have to get the shell out. So it's not exactly a perfect analogy, but you you wanna get that stuff out, so you're, like, wait a minute. Do you guys really do that? So you got a hold of a bunch of vials. You tested it. Can you talk about what you found? Speaker 1: So what we found we we weren't actually looking for this, but what we did end up finding after sequencing these, We were sequencing the RNA to see if they made any errors making the RNA, and lo and behold, a bunch of DNA came through that wasn't supposed to be there. Sequencing that Encoded the the Plasmid vector, that they're using. And now that Plasmid vector contains a lot of other parts. Uh-uh it has a antibiotic resistance gene, which makes the plasmid gives the E coli resistance to antibiotics, so you can grow only the E coli that have the plasmid. And it also has, at least in the Pfizer side of things, it has what's known as an SV 40 promoter. This is an oncogenic virus, piece from an oncogenic virus. It's not the entire virus. However, the small piece is known to drive very aggressive gene expression. And the concern that people even at the FDA have made note in the past whenever injecting double stranded DNA is that these things can then integrate into the genome. If you're not careful on, on how you manufacture these things and you have excess amounts of this DNA, The concern for genome integration goes up. There's probably been a lot of discussion throughout the last few years about whether or not the mRNA gets turned into DNA And then and then integrates to the genome. Yes. It's it all it all rests on this, like, reverse transcriptase argument. And there's been a couple interesting papers that have shown that the virus can do it From Rudy Genesch's lab at the Whitehead, there's been some work from Marcus Alden out in Sweden on this as well or Switzerland that looks at the actual Pfizer vaccine reverse transcribed in cancer, liver cells, and everyone's written that off saying those are liver cells, doesn't matter. However, you don't need reverse transcriptase if you're injecting DNA. It's already turned into DNA, and so the integration risks go up dramatically if you're injecting Speaker 0: the So a lot of people are confused, just just to kind of slow that down, that, you know, there's a question whether mRNA reverse transcribes into DNA and we have that Swedish paper we talked about. But you're saying a lot of people don't know that the MRNAs derived from DNA expression. And if that is mixed into the shot, well, you're getting the DNA straight, so that in itself would be would be a a a real, you know, that that would be a smoking gun. So do I have this straight that you found that the contamination of the mRNA vaccines with DNA, is up to 35%? Speaker 1: That depends on how you measure it. Now, there's a new There's a new base inside of this vaccine. I'm sure your audience is aware of. They had to modify the mRNA so that it wouldn't break down. It's got n n one methylsituaridines. As a result of that, a lot of the tools we use in genomics are a little bit confused differentiating DNA and RNA. There's a couple platforms out there that use, interclating that come to numbers like that as high as 30%. However, a thing that might be more conservative or perhaps, If you want if you want to do the most conservative approach and give the pharmaceutical companies the benefits of doubt, use something like quantitative PCR that only measures the DNA From the plasmid and nothing else. No E. Coli, nothing else. And, of course, that's what everyone in in the world is kind of familiar with. They've used qPCR for for monitoring this pandemic. If you run this through qPCR, you'll get something that says CT score around 20. Now for those familiar with the pandemic, you were probably getting called Positive for a CT less than 40. There's big controversy over that. It's very late. The difference between 20 and 40 is a million Alright. So they're willing to inject you with a contaminant that's a 1000000 fold higher than what you might get outside of your You coasted burial on your nose for virus. Speaker 0: You were considered, you know, forced to quarantine based on that level of presence of virus, but you're saying you found in the vials a level of of what? E. Coli or or or DNA plasmid? Speaker 1: It's it's plasma It's plasmid that is replicates the coli and, you know, we don't yet know if it's full length plasmid, but we do know it's Plasmid sequence. When we sequence this DNA, we can tell that it's derived from the plasmid, but the, you know, the sequencing process tends to break the DNA up into smaller pieces. So we can't tell you what percent of the DNA is full length and circular, but that doesn't really matter to the FDA. The FDA and the EMA don't have any requirements about the length of DNA. They just want to have it be, if there's 3 30 nanograms per milligram of DNA, then that's above the limit. There's a good article for folks to, read in on this called from Keith Peden from the FDA, p e d e n. He does a lot of work, assessing how much double stranded DNA is actually tolerable in these types of injections. And this is where some of these where they zero in on some of these numbers. In all cases of how we measure this, the vials that we've had access to are above the limits. And even in the EMA's own documentation. Yeah. Above the limits of 330 nanograms per milligram. Now if if you look into the EMA Speaker 0: are confirmed by the EMA? Speaker 1: Well, I shouldn't say they've confirmed our exact findings, but if you actually read what Pfizer gave to the European Medicines Agency, they showed them 10 lots of data on what their numbers were. And they had some lots in there that were satisfactory. They were 1 millig 1 nanogram per milligram. They had other lots that were 815 Nanograms per milligram. So it varied by 8 15 fold just in the 10 lots that they gave to EMA. And 815 is obviously well over 3 30. Alright. So even in the data that that Pfizer could cherry pick and hand to the FDA, they could not get these numbers under control. And I think that's what, should worry everybody is that we've only surveyed a few lots. If you went and surveyed 10 lots, You would probably find a 10 fold variance. Maybe you need an 800 fold variance in these numbers, because that's at least the variance that we can see inside the documentation of given Regulatory agencies. Speaker 0: So so based on what you're saying, it's not just an issue of, likely, the the DNA plasmids. It's that there's no quality control, so there could be a huge variance in a lot of different, components of the shot. Do you think this is one of the reasons behind the big confounding question as to, you know, there's so many things that are dangerous about this. And indeed, we see with theirs and v safe and all the studies, it affects every organ system, and people are crushed for life. People are dead from it. But then, you know, there are people that 5 of these things that, at least as of now, they they they appear to be okay. Is that does that have to do with the variance of the vials? Speaker 1: I suspect so. There's there's very little quality control, very little transparency. And some people are probably getting blanks. And some people are probably getting Vaccines that have a tremendous amount of contaminant in them. And, tracking that's gonna Speaker 0: What does that mean? Speaker 1: Oh, I think the Process of of making these things, they they have to blend up these these lipid nanoparticles with DNA. And that process isn't if it's not completely homogeneous, you can get some shots Effectively have very little nucleic acid and other ones that have very high concentration of them. I shouldn't say blanks, but just low. You know, very, you know, very low, in which case they're, they're not really getting exposed to expression of toxic spike protein. And, and, you know, there's It's it's it's it's an open question as to how much of this you actually need to to stimulate immune response. Whenever you have a vaccine engine that is in fact, Pathogenic, you arguably want as little of that as possible. In the way in which they settled on 30 microgram doses was somewhat done warp speed. It's quite possible that they are over exposing. If you will notice over time, they are lowering the dose constantly throughout time. I think they recognize they have been injecting people too much of this stuff. So the bivalents, coming out less. When they go to lower age categories, they're using less. When you look at vaccines that they're talking about in the future, they keep talking about using smaller and smaller quantities of these RNAs. I I think they know there's an issue. They're they're just, you know, they're just adjusting these, as they as they move through time. Speaker 0: Well, we're the new lab rats, I guess. You you you you approve it and distribute it first and then study it later. So I want to get to a punchline for people, you know, what this means, this concern that you're finding, what universally should be regarded as as, alarming levels of DNA plasmids. So in terms of the realm of potential concerns, so antibiotic resistance, anaphylaxis, shock, what else? Speaker 1: Well, there are papers out there Suggesting, and demonstrating that double stranded DNA injections can be prothrombotic. So your immune system can go on fire and create some clots, And of course, that's all over the various database of from Speaker 0: those data. From the spike protein? Speaker 1: Divorce yes. Spite protein is one problem. Having double stranded DNA in there will further exacerbate that. If that double stranded DNA for any reason is a canary For in the coal mine of of this endotoxin being present as well. The spike protein has a bunch of features in it that Actually, tend to to, agglutinate, these endotoxins and collect them and and exacerbate clotting reactions. Okay? So the combination of all 3 of these things, there's any potential endotoxin, which again, we don't have data for, but we're very suspect it could be there because when you see plasma DNA showing up, Its nearest neighbor is always endotoxin. But we know there's DNA in there, and we know the spike protein can get expressed and create these clots. So we've got We've got at least 2 things and maybe 3 things that could be driving thrombosis that are in these shots. Now, I I I wanna make it clear that Speaker 0: Yeah. Speaker 1: Go. Go. I just want to be clear that if they switch this antigen to something that's not as nasty as spike, we're still not in the Alright. There is some talk of them moving to nucleocapsid and a few other areas of this virus to make some type of coronary shot. I don't think that's gonna clear us of the risks of the lip of of the LPS, or of using these lipid nanoparticles, this double stranded DNA connection. Those those issues seem to be part and parcel with this particular platform that they've not yet addressed. There's probably ways to clean them up, but there doesn't seem like they're motivated Do it. Speaker 0: No. Why should they be? No one's There's no liability. So, you know, this is you're giving the scientific rationale for why, you know, you need to have liability like you have in every other product, so the market forces force them to, make a safer product. Obviously, they have no desire to do that. And what's also important, we've we talked a lot about the RSV shots and Moderna's is going to be an mRNA version. So you're gonna have those potential problems even if they don't utilize the spike. I mean, I know doctor McCullough said the proteins he thinks they're utilizing might even be more problematic. But again, putting that aside, you have this issue of how do you derive the the the RNA, and you're saying this double stranded DNA contaminants are a problem, and then again, it could be a drive aggressive gene expression. We don't know the ramifications of that, but, you know, it's not our job to prove a 100% it's doing it. It's their job to rule it out before you put it in those bodies. Yes. Yeah. So I think that Speaker 1: and it it's something that's addressable. There are technologies out there that can erase this DNA. I think they've just Wandered into new territory here because they have these modified nucleotides. Some of the enzymes they use to erase this DNA aren't functioning Early because that other strand is present. It's very these N one methylsituentines are very, very sticky basis, and they tend to stick to the DNA. You end up with these DNA, RNA hybrids that the enzymes don't recognize, and they don't end up erasing the DNA like they should. This is probably something they can address different nucleases, but were never forced to address. It will remain in the future shots unless they get really brought to bear that they have to get rid of the stuff. It is a genome integration risk. That is from the FDA, not from my mouth. Alright. So they are concerned about having high levels of DNA in vaccines because they can integrate. And to the extent that there is an SV 40 promoter in that DNA and that starts integrating into your genome, you're pretty much just Like bombing your genome with promoters that can potentially turn on the gene expression. It it it can look like cancer. It can look like cancer, and that you can end up getting an s c 40 promoter in front of an oncogene, and you will end up with high expression of, a gene that can drive cancer. It will be a very rare event, but you don't need many of these cells to to be hit with something like this in order for it to take off. So, cancer risks and genome integration with SC 40. SC 40 actually plagues, granted, it was the full viral genome, not just the promoter, but this has plagued previous vaccine programs. The polio vaccine was one of them that they were concerned that this may have contributed to cancer from that vaccine. There's a history of being concerned over two forty, and having the promoter inside some of these vectors doesn't seem to be necessary. It seems to be a superfluous oversight they could have eliminated. Yet, it's still there Because they ran this out the door so quickly, they didn't really have time to get rid of superfluous parts of the plasmid. So that piece of DNA is really something I think we really pay attention To, we've made quantitative PCR assays to hunt for this. So there are several researchers around the globe that are now running these assays to look for How much of this DNA is floating around after people have been vaccinated? You've seen a lot of studies of people picking up this this RNA 28 days or 60 days later, But oftentimes those methods don't discern RNA from DNA. They detect both. And so it could have been that this is the DNA that's actually sticking around, and they're seeing DNA in the breast Milk and DNA in the plasma, many weeks later. So we have to get our handle on how much of this is DNA versus RNA in all the people that have, you know, long vax or long COVID. And some of these tools, I think, will help with the part part. Speaker 0: Trial the pretrial phase after, 5,000,000,000 people got this. Speaker 1: Yes. We've got the order flipped. Right. We're figuring out the buyer distribution after we gave it to everybody. Speaker 0: Yeah. And and and only thanks to you, I mean, there there seems to be no interest. I mean, I'm sure they've done tests on it, but they won't disclose them. It's interesting, there's an article in New Scientist recently, Cancer Mystery. Cancer Mystery as cases rise among younger people around the world. Yeah. I mean, it's it's It's pretty, Speaker 1: a real head scratcher. Speaker 0: Yeah, real head scratcher, just like, the WHO declared a problem with myocarditis in in the UK, of course, they blame blamed on enter virus, but, you know, it's it's a lot of these coincidences taking place. I wanted to I I gotta ask you this, in my off base here, is this a big problem? If you have a lot of DNA floating around. Is there a concern? So a lot of people have been wondering why it seems like in many parts of the world, the excess desk got even worse in 2022 and, like, for example, was it Taiwan? I forgot which country I just looked at. You know, it it had its worst excess deaths just a couple months ago when the take up of the vaccine has gone down to nil, and it's been that way for quite some time. So there's this question about, okay, what does this thing do to you long term? Is there a concern that the DNA can create a Trojan horse spike factory over time that could produce more mRNA that will, you know, tell your body to produce more spike. God, I don't know, a year or 2 years, 3 years after you got the shot? Speaker 1: That's that is certainly true. It is a possibility. So far, the few vials that we've looked at, the DNA has been fairly fragmented and and small at length. So I don't think you get full spike expression from what we have seen. However, as I've mentioned before, we only scanned a few of these files, and from what we've looked up in I think there's a website that looks at how bad is my shot. We're not necessarily working with the most notorious lots. So it's possible that some of the other lots have have more intact DNA. Speaker 0: I think you get a hold of it. Speaker 1: Could have well, we we've only been able to get things that are expired. Think I think there's probably some ethical concerns with people, and we're not going we don't wanna encourage anyone to ship us stuff that's stolen. But, you know, the stuff that goes in the trash, people can but if you know, you're starting to do some people's fine. Speaker 0: Like you could call up the FDA and say, hey, you know, I'd like to test a 100 vials from this lot. Speaker 1: I'd I would be very suspect if they even pick up the phone. They seem to be completely told that to everything else going on on this topic. So, yeah. You know, they're they're not gonna help out. Like But Speaker 0: a lot of people and and this has been the problem for 3 years. People like you will come along and pioneer a study that is very concerning on some aspect of this. Now, it doesn't conclusively prove, you know, all of the implications of it, but it certainly shows that this is something that you really need to jump on, and they'll be like, well, you didn't show this or this. Well, yeah, we don't have access to it, but you do, so you have an obligation to take it to the next level. And of course, they don't, at least not publicly, and don't disclose it. Speaker 1: Yes. Speaker 0: Do you believe it's a concern that, again, moving away from the plasmid DNA stuff, just in terms of just general variance. I mean, we're we're talking a lot about the RSV shots and the new flu shots they wanna do and and Nipah, Zika. And we could talk about a 1000000 different prima facie problems with the pursuit of those vaccines and the way they're doing it. But based on what you're telling me, why shouldn't this be a problem with an array of ingredients that they put in the RSV shot? Speaker 1: Anything that has a that has a liability waiver, you should always question the quality control because what that is giving them is a hall pass in doing any of it. And, and there's going to be no one responsible for monitoring it once it goes up the door. Once the FDA Gets on board with something, there's some psychological, I think block for them to reverse and then look how long it took them to reverse Vioxx, it was 5 years Right. And the market knew there was a problem long before the FDA finally got their ass and did something about it. So, the same is gonna be true with any vaccine that comes has a liability waiver. Diox didn't have a liability waiver and it was still wrong. Alright. So, I think the whole, you know, the population should be Pay close attention to that. And and to your point about, the burden of proof and where it falls, well, you know, the the the number one critique front of the work is it's not through peer review. I'd be surprised if it gets through peer review, not because of the quality of the work, but because the journals just don't accept this type of stuff. Most of the journals have pharmaceutical funding. So the best thing you can do in an environment like that is produce assays and methods that people can reproduce, Very cheaply and quickly because science isn't about peer review, it's about reproduction. If other people can reproduce your work in another country, then science moves forward. Peer review, most people don't realize, no one picks up a pipette in peer review. They just sit around a table and opine whether they believe your work or not. But rubber meets the road with reproduction. So what we've done, what we've been very careful to do is to publish all of our methods, put them transparently on the web, so anyone can copy these PCR primers and replicate the work In a matter of weeks. We've got now a couple labs around the world that are starting to do that. So we've seen some evidence from a group in Europe that has to reproduce the sequencing of the monovalent vaccines, they shared the sequence with us, they're in the process of publishing it, and they saw the same thing. The FC 40 promoters are in there, and there's in fact DNA present. There is a group in Japan that's doing some of this as well. They've also seen very low CT scores suggesting high amounts of DNA So, it's beginning to occur in a much more decentralized manner, and I think that's what people should keep their eye Can people reproduce this, ignore whether the journals, whether they bless this or not, because even if it gets through peer review, there'll be a mob that will pack it and try and get it retracted. And that's that's not that's not the scientific method. Scientific method is all about reproduction. Yeah. Speaker 0: No. And and that's I'm glad you mentioned that because it's not just about the liability waiver. It's that the most powerful governments of the universe, beginning with our own government, they have embedded in all aspects of society, medicine, and academia. The funding, the censorship, the boot of the government to monopolize the the the marketplace and the public square to ensure that there is no quality control. Meaning meaning, even without the formal, liability waiver, you add it to all of that, you know, what other product is funded and promoted and distributed by government this much, and then a separate pot of money funding and promoting everything down from the, you know, associate whatever. You know, pediatric, whatevers, and the college of OB GYNs, and up and down the totem pole. There is literally no ability to to stop this. Speaker 1: I mean it's very centralized. We need to decentralize the NIH. I mean look at what they did with the whole pandemic origin story, right. They changed the narrative there because they had some central control and were able to you know promote this zoonosis fraud. And then, you can even look at the there's the Zhang papers, the one that demonstrated nuclear localization of this thing and potentially It's impacting P53 and BRCA1, had a cancer risk, right? There is someone in the government, getting his last name, it's Eric. I have to point your listeners to a to a link afterwards. But but basically, some employees at the NIH went and attacked this paper and got it retracted, And then people foiled their emails and they had 4 50 emails with this author's name in it, 4 50 pages of emails, and they were all redacted. Alright. So there's a whole story on the Jiang paper on how they went out and killed a paper that was for for illegitimate reasons. I've read the paper and that the the reasons for retraction one of the authors disagrees with the retraction as he should. And it was basically an inside government hit job on a paper to get it torn down. You know, the truth isn't going to come out through their channels. It's going to come out through channels like yours and alternative Speaker 0: Based on what you're saying, I don't know if you saw this yesterday, it's all the more Gary the fact that despite all the censorship, doctor Paul Offit, who's perhaps the most notorious, child vaccinologist, he and 3 others on Verbeck voted against the Pfizer Harness v shot. That's a pretty big deal and that that's gotta be really bad fur, because they they rarely have dissent. And that that really does scare me. Speaker 1: Been changes too, which is which is, people should pay very close attention to that. Been obviously very pro vaxx his entire career. He's the benefactor of the entire system. And even he is seeing that this has gone way too far. Yep. And that If you say publicly, Speaker 0: you better believe privately there's a lot more where that came from. If this is what he's willing to say publicly, because I mean, this thing is I mean, you know, I'm not a scientist. I'm not a doctor. I'm a political guy. I know politics. And I say controversial things, get involved in things. I have never seen more of a viciousness, then I mean, I mean, you could you could, like, wave a confederate flag and and you won't be attacked as much as as for, questioning vaccines. I mean, this is the holy grail. And this is just really scary, even if they shut off all the shots, but the fact that they're doubling down on warp speed and they're ready out for the next. Your research is very important. Exit question. What could people expect from you in the coming months and where could they find your work? Speaker 1: Well, our work is, you'll find most of my work either on Twitter or Substack. The Substack is, is an end in mind is my handle there, and the substack is the Pedalactone newsletter. The Pedalactone, I know it's a long word, but it's catnip. It's the actual, it's the active ingredient in catnip, so that's the way to find it. So all of the methods that we that we published are up there. I work at medicinal genomics, which has nothing to do with with with QC vaccines. This was a bit of an accident that we ran into this and felt like we had to put it public. But nonetheless, our efforts are focused on bringing sequencing and genomics into medicinal plants and fungi markets because we believe the way to basically defang this pharma cartel is to actually get natural medicines that you can grow in your backyard to be better qualified, I understood and sequenced. So, we produce a lot of safety monitoring tools in the cannabis in philosophy space, And those are those are markets that you're seeing some medical legalization decentralized out of the FDA and into dispensaries. And we think that's a safer and a more appropriate model for medicines that we know have extraordinarily, favorable safety profiles. Putting them through to the FDA is only going to make them more Probably, you know, chronified it into a few a few people who can sell them. So our that's that's our expertise. I don't know what's gonna happen next on this. We're involved in lawsuits right now about this topic. Right now, there's not much more that we can do other than survey more vials. But right now, we are trying to Send out reagents to anyone who wants to replicate this, so that we can get a better survey of what other what the vial to vial variance is in the field. Because right now we have such a narrow view on this. It's just a few vials and of course the major critique people have about the vials that we have Surveyed are that, we don't have provenance over them and they're expired. Right? So what does this look like in in vials that you can get directly From CVS or directly from, from pharma that are within their expiration range. That's still an unknown. For those who have critiqued the work About these being expired vials. I will remind everyone that they were sealed vials, so they were not tampered with and, the vector that We found the sequence that we found that matches Pfizer's disclosure to the EMA. So, we they did not get they did not disclose the sequence DNA, they gave them a little pretty picture of a map of their plasmid that they covered up the SG 40 region, they hid that from the EMA. We managed to sequence everything, find all of their details, but also find the SP 40 region. So I don't think any, you know, gremlin could have put that into these vials and, and And produce these results. These things, it seems to be legitimate that these are within the vials. The only question is, what is the concentration of the DNA versus the RNA, and how does that vary lot to lot? And we're going to learn that in time. So I'd say, just stay tuned. There's a lot of people replicating this work in various jurisdictions around the world on different lots. And we should have more data in the next 6 months to get people more insight on how much it varies. Speaker 0: Well, we'll definitely be be following you on Twitter and following your work. Thanks so much for the briefing today, and looking forward to having you back. Wow, folks. That was something else. You might wanna go back and listen on half the speed. Threw in a lot there, talked quickly, I apologize, the audio wasn't the greatest, but you know, the point is not to get all the scientific nuances. You're smart enough to realize that this jives with everything we've seen for 3 years. There's no quality control, there's no desire for it. Everything that our type of researchers discover and they say is wrong turns out to be true. And the symptomology that we're seeing from the world jives with everything he's saying. And again, they're doing this as they're approving other vaccines at warp speed non stop, and there is no backstop to this. And that that leads me to the end of the show. You know, you look you look at the last couple weeks.

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

Sequencing of bivalent Moderna and Pfizer mRNA vaccines reveals nanogram to microgram quantities of expression vector dsDNA per dose "The assembly of Pfizer vial 1 contains a 72bp insertion not present in the assembly of Pfizer vial 2. This indel is known for its enhancement to the SV40 promoter and its nuclear localization signal (Dean et al. 1999) (Moreau et al. 1981)." Kevin McKernan, Yvonne Helbert, Liam T. Kane, Stephen McLaughlin Medicinal Genomics @Kevin_McKernan https://osf.io/b9t7m/

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

Japanese Professor Murakami of Tokyo University expresses concerns over the alarming discovery of Simian Virus 40 (SV40) promoters, associated with human cancer development, in Pfizer vials: "The Pfizer vaccine has a staggering problem. I have made an amazing finding. This figure is an enlarged view of Pfizer's vaccine sequence. As you can see, the Pfizer vaccine sequence contains part of the SV40 sequence here. This sequence is known as a promoter. Roughly speaking, the promoter causes increased expression of the gene. The problem is that the sequence is present in a well-known carcinogenic virus. The question is why such a sequence that is derived from a cancer virus is present in Pfizer's vaccine. There should be absolutely no need for such a carcinogenic virus sequence in the vaccine. This sequence is totally unnecessary for producing the mRNA vaccine. It is a problem that such a sequence is solidly contained in the vaccine. This is not the only problem. If a sequence like this is present in the DNA, the DNA is easily migrated to the nucleus. So it means that the DNA can easily enter the genome. This is such an alarming problem. It is essential to remove the sequence. However, Pfizer produced the vaccine without removing the sequence. That is outrageously malicious. This kind of promoter sequence is completely unnecessary for the production of the mRNA vaccine. In fact, SV40 is a promoter of cancer viruses." @Kevin_McKernan

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: I read the sequence and it's high-resolution. Speaker 1: It may seem low at first, but it's understandable. Speaker 0: This is written in a loop. Speaker 1: This is the genetic sequence of the spike protein. The issue is that the model RNA has a sequence that surprised me. We need to design it a bit. It contains part of the sequence SB4T, which is necessary for gene expression. The problem is that it is found in a virus that has negative effects. Also, there is another problem with this sequence. The DNA that has been transferred so far becomes more susceptible to mutation. It's a problematic point. Speaker 1: So, this SB4T sequence is also included in the promoter of this SB method, which allows it to migrate to the nucleus. Speaker 0: This is quite famous. Speaker 1: Yes, it is. The issue is that it has no relation to the process of synthesizing the messenger RNA. Speaker 0: Why did they keep the promoter sequence in the SB4T that has nothing to do with the camera's perspective in the messenger RNA synthesis process?
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: 配列 が えっ 読め るわけ で し ハイ レ ゾ に 読んで みた の は これが モデル ナ の方 の ハイ ですね Speaker 1: まあ 一旦 じゃあ の 低い かもしれないけど わ っ か なんですね パー ス ん とき Speaker 0: えー っ これ Speaker 1: 輪っか に 書いて あって Speaker 0: ブー ブー ここは スパイ ク の 遺伝子 なんですね で ですね 問題は モデル ナ の方が よく 大 腸 菌 で くれ 利用 する よ を ラ ベ クター で 配列 なんですが スパイ ザー の この 配列 で 服 見て びっくり した んですけども で 効果 ちょっと の 設計 しますね ここに ですね s b 4 t の 配列 の一部 が入って まして で 恒 例 は フル モーター って言う んですけども 遺伝子 発 現 を ですね 上昇 させる っていうか 遺伝子 発 現 を させる の に必要な 配列 なんですよ で 問題は 有名な その せい を持って るような ウイルス で その 排出 が入っている ということ がありまして どうして こういう ガン ボ リュー ス でいい かって 扉 絵 するような ハイ ですが ブー ブー それが 8 しか 入ってる っていうの と あと ですね もう一つ の問題 はこの 配列 が入っています と ですね その d na が 今まで 移行 し あ つ な っ その d na は a と 移行 し やすくなる と あり やすくなる んですね の も に っ パ プリ フ っていう の問題 点 まあ ある Speaker 1: わけで その この s b 法 廷 の プロ モーター の中に 核 に 移行 するような 配列 も 入ってる ってこと です Speaker 0: で これ 結構 有名な Speaker 1: ござい まし Speaker 0: そう なんですよ やっぱり 問題 なのは ね メ ッ セン ジャー の 王 道 視点 カメラ で 合成 するような プロセス に 全く 関係ない su v 4 t に プロ モーター 配列 を なぜ 残 した んです

@KanekoaTheGreat - KanekoaTheGreat

Full Podcast: The Man Who Found DNA Toxins in Pfizer & Moderna Vials with @RMConservative and @Kevin_McKernan https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-man-who-found-dna-toxins-in-pfizer-moderna-vials/id1065050908?i=1000613696167

‎Conservative Review with Daniel Horowitz: The Man Who Found DNA Toxins in Pfizer & Moderna Vials | Guest: Kevin McKernan | 5/19/23 on Apple Podcasts It’s not just the spike protein and the mRNA that are a problem. Microbiologist Kevin McKernan pioneered research on testing some of the COVID vaccine vials and discovered unacceptable levels of double-stranded DNA plasmids floating around. He joins us today to warn that there is no quality control… podcasts.apple.com
SenseReceptor
Posted - May 25, 2023 at 2:57 PM
Saved - November 23, 2023 at 9:19 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Experts testify on the dangers of COVID-19 vaccines, calling for their immediate halt. Dr. McCullough warns of excess mortality and over 3,400 papers describing vaccine injuries. Pharma insider Latypova reveals fraudulent testing and batch variability. Pathologist Dr. Cole highlights an alarming increase in cancers. Dr. Lindsay exposes contamination with DNA plasmids, which can cause infections and antibiotic resistance. Obstetrician-gynecologist Dr. Thorp reports a surge in miscarriages, fetal anomalies, and complications. These testimonies raise serious concerns about the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines. Watch the full testimonies here.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

"ALL THE COVID-19 VACCINES ARE NOT SAFE FOR HUMAN USE... WE NOW HAVE OVER 3,400 PAPERS IN THE PEER-REVIEWED LITERATURE DESCRIBING FATAL AND NON-FATAL VACCINE INJURY SYNDROMES." While there have been many efforts* to force the removal of the utterly ineffective** and wildly dangerous*** COVID-19 injections from use in the general population at the federal and state levels, to date, they've all failed. Now, the “We the People 50, Recall the Shots” initiative****—run by political blogger, artist, and researcher Carolyn Blakeman, attorney Michael Hamilton, and scientist, toxicologist, and molecular biologist Dr. Janci Lindsay (@JanciToxDoc)—is attempting to have the literal bioweapons***** halted by authorities at the county level. In a hearing held on May 22, 2023, various experts testified on behalf of the initiative via Zoom in front of the Washington County, Idaho Commissioner. The experts included Dr. Lindsay, renowned cardiologist Dr. Peter McCullough (@P_McCulloughMD), former pharmaceutical R&D executive and entrepreneur Sasha Latypova (@sasha_latypova), pathologist Dr. Ryan Cole (@drcole12), and obstetrician-gynecologist Dr. James Thorp (@jathorpmfm), who all unequivocally called for a complete and immediate stoppage for any and all COVID-19 injections. "All the COVID-19 vaccines are not safe for human use. They should all be removed from the market due to excess mortality," McCullough says in this clip of his testimony. He adds, "We can't allow any more Americans to die after taking the COVID-19 vaccines." McCullough—who's previously said the COVID-19 injections are an "abject failure" and are causing myocarditis that's “far more widespread than we could ever imagine"******—notes that "We now have over 3,400 papers in the peer-reviewed literature describing fatal and non-fatal vaccine injury syndromes." The cardiologist, who has broadly published on a range of topics in medicine with more than 1,000 publications and 500-plus citations in the National Library of Medicine*******, even says that the spike protein encoded by the mRNA injections "may be the most dangerous protein in human medicine." Furthermore, McCullough notes that "We have a situation where the vaccines are considered emergency countermeasures and we're under a national security operation in the United States. So conventional safety rules are not being followed by the FDA, because [the injections are] considered [to be] an emergency countermeasure." *Pfizer whistleblower Brook Jackson's False Claims Act complaint against Pfizer is perhaps the best-known attempt: https://sensereceptornews.com/?p=17713 **59 studies evincing the COVID injections' rapidly waning efficacy that ultimately results in negative efficacy: https://sensereceptornews.com/?p=5926 ***Articles evincing the enormous dangers of the injections: https://sensereceptornews.com/?page_id=7817 ****https://wethepeople50.com/the-team/ *****Hear the overwhelming evidence supporting this claim from Latypova herself here: https://sensereceptornews.com/?p=15980 ******Source: https://sensereceptornews.com/?p=18076 *******Source: https://uscjournal.com/authors/peter-mccullough

Video Transcript AI Summary
COVID-19 vaccines are deemed unsafe and should be removed from the market due to reported deaths and injuries. The spike protein found in patients who died after vaccination is believed to be extremely dangerous, causing blood clotting and affecting various organs. Pfizer allegedly concealed information about vaccine-related deaths, but external lawyers managed to make it public. The vaccines are considered emergency countermeasures, so standard safety rules are not followed. Only a small percentage of people are getting vaccinated, and there are concerns about cardiovascular damage, blood clots, and immunologic issues. Some batches of vaccines have severe side effects, but there is no system in place to recall them. The vaccines have failed to stop COVID-19 and are not medically necessary. The speaker recommends removing the vaccines from the market and implementing a moratorium on genetic vaccine research.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: COVID 19 vaccines are not safe for human use. They should all be removed from the market due to excess mortality. We can't allow any more Americans to die, after taking the COVID nineteen vaccines. We now have over 3,400 papers in the peer reviewed literature describing fatal and nonfatal vaccine injury syndromes. We know that the vaccines have the genetic code for the lethal Wuhan spike protein, the spike protein that was devised in the Chinese biosecurity lab in Wuhan, China. This spike protein, in the case of patients who have died, has been found in the heart, the brain, the, the immunologic tissues, the lymph nodes. And it's known to cause blood clotting. And, it may be the most dangerous protein we've ever encountered in human medicine, certainly the most dangerous I've ever seen. It has a dangerous mechanism of action. From the outset, we saw excess deaths that, broke all conventional safety barriers. Pfizer knew about 1223 deaths within 90 days of their vaccine. They recorded it in Seeing they recorded it in their post marketing data, the U. S. FDA wanted to block that information to America for 55 years in court. Fortunately, External lawyers prevail. We have a situation where the vaccines are considered emergency countermeasures, and we're under a national, security operation in the United States. So conventional safety, rules are not being followed by the FDA because it's considered emergency countermeasures. So, therefore, the the, the decision making really falls in the banks and local jurisdictions, in terms of, mass vaccination. You understand that this has been tremendously controversial. Currently, fewer than 15% of people are taking any, additional vaccines. Less than 10% of nursing home workers, as a proxy for people who really understand about these vaccines. They cause cardiovascular damage, myocarditis, provoke heart attacks and sudden death. They cause strokes and intracranial hemorrhage. They cause blood clots in record numbers, both in the arterial and venous system. And then immunologic problems, they have special terms now. One's vaccine induced, thrombotic thrombocytopenia. And the other one is, multisystem inflammatory disorder due to the vaccines. The risk appears, to persist now about 2 years or longer after the first 2 shots in a recent paper published using retinal artery scans for blood clots in the arteries and the veins, and people have taken the vaccine compared to those who didn't take the vaccine. We, you know, have great concerns. There may be even more problems that are discovered in the future because these are long lasting Genetic shots there's never been a study showing they leave the human body or that it broke down. It's very disturbing. The spike protein produced from the genetic material, less in the body at least 9 months or longer. Again, we need data to suggest that it's cleared out of the body, completely at some point in time. We think every shot is progressively, accumulating risk in the human body. And then there's the stochastic risk on each shot. So someone could have tolerated 4 prior shots and die on the 5th shot, as An 81 year old male described, by Yamamoto and colleagues in Japan has just been published, out of my sub spec, but it's in the peer reviewed literature. In my clinical practice, I've had patients die after the vaccine. I've seen all the different Variations of heart damage, blood clots, amputation, stroke, and a tremendous set of casualties in Americans that simply, was not warranted. The vaccines are, in my medical opinion, and my authoritative opinion for America is that they're simply not safe for human use, whether they're considered emergency countermeasure or just another medicinal product. By all, means, they need to be removed from the market before more people are damaged. Now, the recent paper by Schmeling and colleagues helps explain a question, that you may have in your mind. Why are some people take the shots, including some of you listening right now have taken the shots? Why are some of you fine and other people dying? And what showed is there are basically 3 groupings of batches and they showed this with the Pfizer vaccine in Denmark. They had all the side effects, captured. And they showed a third of the people who a third of the batches, nothing happened. It was like taking a shot of saline. Zero side effects. Two thirds have some form of a side effect, but it's pretty mild and self limited. And then that final batch, which is only 4.2% of doses, that the side effects are through the roof, including the blood clots, heart damage, and death, 4.2%. Now whether that's hyper Concentrated messenger RNA and and aggregated lipid nanoparticles or if it's DNA plasmids, that are contaminants that Ms. Demaret And Doctor. Lindsey suggested, you know, we don't know. But we can tell you that there is a small number of batches. And as more batches come out, some are going to be lethal and, otherwise, they're gonna be harmless. But those harmful batches, Right now, there's no mechanism that's in place to retrieve them and get them out of, out of circulation. So that means somebody walks into a vaccine center could be harm from one of these patches. -Mm -And finally, the vaccines have completely failed on stopping COVID nineteen, the infection. 94% of Americans have already had COVID nineteen now, according to a paper from Harvard by Klassen and colleagues. 97% have some form of protection even from subclinical disease. Once you've had the infection, there's a 0% chance of hospitalization and death with the next infection. So vaccine is clearly not medically necessary. That's been shown by a paper from the U. S. Prison system by Chen and colleagues. So the vaccines, did not stop COVID-nineteen. They're not necessary medically necessary or clinically indicated. They don't stop Stop transmission. Our CDC director told us that promptly in 2021. So there's no reason to have a mandate that'll stop a vaccinated person from spreading it to one another. And then lastly, they don't reduce severe disease. There's never been a prospective randomized double blind placebo controlled trial demonstrating that. The consent form does not indicate that claim, because Centaur doesn't make any therapeutic claims that people, reduce a severe illness or hospitalization days to death with vaccine. So in summary, the vaccines actually have no theoretical benefit, and they have extraordinary harm. And there have been far too many Americans harmed today. So I'm going to finish and conclude by saying the vaccines should be removed from all markets. I think every state and jurisdiction has a responsibility to protect to their constituents, from any more exposure to the COVID-nineteen vaccines. I think there should be a moratorium on genetic vaccine research, both in animals and humans. The RNA, technology that's being used in animals right now, does not appear to be safe. There are no assurances that genetic material won't be transmitted through the food supply. If they're utilized, I think they should be completely removed from the market. We've had a disastrous first, hand experience with experience with widespread injectable genetic technology in living creatures. I'm doctor Peter McCullough from Dallas, Texas. Thank you so much, Ray. Listening to my testimony.
REMINDER: Whistleblower Brook Jackson Says Pfizer ‘Falsified and Fabricated’ Data Re: Its COVID ‘Vaccine’ Trials; Unblinded Patients and Doctors; Did Not Dutifully Report Adverse Events – Sense Receptor News sensereceptornews.com
59 Studies Showing the COVID-19 ‘Vaccines’ Wane Rapidly, Ultimately Don’t Mitigate Disease Spread – Sense Receptor News sensereceptornews.com
‘Vaccine’ Side Effects – Sense Receptor News sensereceptornews.com
The Team wethepeople50.com
Pharma Insider Reveals Irrefutable Evidence of Conspiracy to Commit Mass Murder by the US DoD, HHS, and Pharma Cartel Via the COVID Injections in New In-Depth Presentation – Sense Receptor News sensereceptornews.com
In New Interview Dr. Peter McCullough Says COVID Vaccines Are ‘Abject Failure,’ WHO Is ‘Drunk with Power,’ and Myocarditis is ‘Far More Widespread than We Could Ever Imagine’ – Sense Receptor News sensereceptornews.com
Peter A McCullough, Cardiologist | USC Journal Find out more about Dr Peter A McCullough, Cardiologist from the William Beaumont Hospital, MI, US. Read articles from Dr Peter A McCullough. uscjournal.com

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

"CLINICAL TRIALS AND ANIMAL TESTING NEVER HAD ANY IMPACT ON WHAT WAS BEING COMMERCIALLY MANUFACTURED. THAT'S WHY WE SEE ALL THE CONTAMINATIONS AND EXTREMELY RECKLESS PRODUCTION FOR THESE MATERIALS." Expounding on McCullough's point, Latypova, who spent more than 25 years in the pharmaceutical industry during her career*—working with over 60 pharma companies all over the world, including Pfizer—notes that "all consumer protection laws that consumers and [the] general public [expect] to see from pharmaceutical products have been suspended for these particular injections." Highlighting a key point Latypova has discussed on many previous occasions**, the pharma insider notes that there is "tremendous variability" between batches of the COVID injections. She highlights research conducted by Max Schmeling, et al.***, which found there are three "groupings" in regard to deadliness level for the COVID injections. Latypova specifically notes there are "some small-sized very toxic batches amongst larger-size, medium- to low-toxicity ones," which is why "the profile of adverse events" is "hugely distributed" and clustered by geography, by time, and even by alphanumeric code. Latypova goes on to note the following: "I specifically reviewed FOIA'd information for clinical non-animal testing that was performed for these products and it was extremely fraudulently conducted with materials being tested that have no significance or relationship to these products... Overall, the testing did not satisfy even minimal requirements and most importantly was not done before commercial-scale manufacturing of these products was produced. Specifically millions of doses, about 30 million doses of these products, [were] commercially made, even before trials started or [were] completed. And animal testing was done in parallel. So clinical trials and animal testing never had any impact on what was being commercially manufactured. That's why we see all the contaminations and extremely reckless production for these materials." *Source: https://www.linkedin.com/in/sashalatypova/ **One example of Latypova speaking on batch variability: https://sensereceptornews.com/?p=12415 ***Source: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eci.13998

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the lack of compliance with consumer protection laws and good manufacturing practices in the production of certain injections. They express a loss of confidence in authorities like the FDA and CDC due to a campaign of propaganda and misinformation. The speaker highlights the variability and toxicity of different batches, as well as the exemption of liability for manufacturers and administrators of these products. They also mention fraudulent animal testing and the absence of traceability and serialization in the distribution chain. The speaker calls for a halt to these injections until a thorough investigation is conducted and safety is ensured.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: My expertise is in, cGMP or good manufacturing practice compliance and in general compliance with Food Drugs and Cosmetics Act, which I can tell you right away is not followed for these injections at all. So all consumer protection laws that consumers and general public expects to see from pharmaceutical products are have been suspended for these particular injections. In fact it's suspended wholesale by the provision that designates them as emergency use authorized countermeasures under public health emergency. This is 21 USC 360 BBB, emergency user authorization provision, which suspends all consumer protection requirements including cGMP law compliance for these products. This has not been disclosed to the public. In fact, the opposite has happened. As, my colleagues have described, there's been a tremendous campaign of propaganda, lies unfortunately supported by authorities that I previously fully trusted such as FDA and CDC and I no longer have any confidence in them. And, this this is why I believe it's urgent that we communicate this to, to the public, that you You communicate this to your constituents that you issue that vote of no confidence to the federal authorities that are supposed to regulate these products. They are a straight line to the public. Specifically what we found, a tremendous as doctor McCullough mentioned, tremendous variability batch to batch and in fact, yes, Three groupings of batches, some small size, very toxic batches amongst larger size, medium to low toxicity once. That's why we see the profile of adverse events as we see hugely distributed, clustering by geographies, clustering by time, Clustering even by labels that are, you know, alphanumeric codes, that are assigned to those batches, something that we never never ever should see in well produced cGMP compliant product. We also know that, Prep Act declarations exempt, these products and their manufacturers and in fact anybody who administers or participates along the supply chain from any and all liability and this is a very thorough exemption. And so again yet another consumer protection mechanism removed completely for these shots. And the public does not understand that the there is no liability whatsoever if they are injured or even killed, if their child is killed. And we have unfortunately, sadly, so many cases of that happening. The, there were specific, I, in addition to the clinical observations from my colleagues, I specifically reviewed FOIA information for non clinical animal testing that was performed for these products And it was, extremely fraudulently conducted with materials being tested that have no significance or relationship to These products, irrelevant test articles being tested and then declared as sufficient for these products. Overall the testing did not satisfy even minimal requirements and most importantly was not done before commercial scale manufacturing of these products was produced. Specifically millions of doses, about 30,000,000 of doses of these products was made even before commercially made even before the clinical trials started or completed and animal testing was done in parallel. So the clinical trials and animal testing never had any impact on what was being commercial commercially manufactured. That's why we see, all the contaminations and, extremely reckless production for these materials. And, finally, what I would like to say, another additional safeguard that was removed is a Traceability and serialization of these products, according to good distribution practices that pharmaceutical distributors are supposed to follow. These products are distributed by the Department of Defense US government. They are owned by the US government throughout the distribution chain until they get injected into the person. This is specified by the CDC vaccination contracts with vaccination centers. And that, removes The traceability of all these doses and their ingredients throughout the supply chain. So We cannot trace, specifically each dose or each vial as it appears in the pharmacy or anywhere in the vaccination center. We cannot trace them to the source. We cannot trace them to the specific manufacturer line, raw material production. So so when wherever these contaminations are coming from we can't even figure out of where they they're coming from exactly so that, that this can be stopped, let's say, for a specific batch. That's why we need to put a stop on them wholesale and say until this is fully investigated, until we find what happened, who is accountable, and how and how to prevent it in the future, and fully test them for safety. We cannot have this technology on the market. It's extremely dangerous.
Sasha Latypova | LinkedIn View Sasha Latypova’s professional profile on LinkedIn. LinkedIn is the world’s largest business network, helping professionals like Sasha Latypova discover inside connections to recommended job candidates, industry experts, and business partners. linkedin.com
Interview with Pharma Insider Reveals How the Department of Defense Has Coordinated the Entire COVID ‘Vaccine’ Rollout from Manufacturing to Distribution – Sense Receptor News sensereceptornews.com

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

"THE TREND INCREASE OF CANCER OVER AVERAGE IS ANYWHERE FROM A SEVEN- TO 12-SIGMA INCREASE, WHICH IS ASTOUNDINGLY SIGNIFICANT..." Adding on to the countless reasons the COVID injections should be stopped immediately, Cole highlights the fact that there has been an "astoundingly significant" increase in cancers since their rollout. "We've seen an increase in cancer throughout the world after the rollout of these experimental injections," Cole says. He adds that "This has been confirmed by analysis of CDC data, [which show] the trend increase of cancer over average is anywhere from a seven- to 12-sigma increase, which is astoundingly significant..." Cole adds that when he testified in the European Union's parliament, "more than half the individuals in the room confirmed that they know somebody—a family member, a patient, etc.—[who] has a new, or rapid-onset, or rapidly aggressive cancer after being cleared of cancer after receiving multiple of these experimental, investigational injections." Cole goes on to note that "These products cause an inability of our bodies to repair breaks in our DNA" and that "they alter the ability of our innate immune system to function properly." The veteran pathologist adds, "There are so many carcinogenic mechanisms of action that these products can cause, [and] these are all studies that should have been done in animals before they ever went into the human body." Hear more about how the COVID injections have been linked to the rise of so-called "turbo cancers" here: https://sensereceptornews.com/?p=14873

Video Transcript AI Summary
A scientist reports an increase in cancer cases worldwide after the rollout of experimental injections. CDC data confirms this trend, with a significant increase in cancer cases. The spike protein in these injections binds to the p53 gene, leading to cancer pathways opening up. There are numerous harmful effects caused by the spike protein, and the scientist is concerned about the lack of long-term safety studies for these products. The lipid nanoparticles in Pfizer and Moderna vaccines, not intended for human or veterinary use, have been administered to over 5 billion people. The J&J vaccine, containing a carcinogenic substance, was quietly pulled from the market. The NIH is withholding information on cancer pathways and forced the retraction of a scientific paper. These injections also affect the immune system's ability to function properly, impacting cancer prevention. The scientist apologizes for those who received these injections without informed consent and urges action at the local level to stop further harm.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Thing I am here to report as a scientist my observations. We've seen an increased cancer throughout the world after the rollout of these experimental, injections. This has been confirmed, by analysis of CDC data. The trend increase of cancer over average is anywhere from a 7 to 12 sigma, increase which is astoundingly significant when I was testifying in the EU parliament, more than half of the individuals in the room confirmed that they know somebody, family member, a patient, etcetera, who has a new or rapid onset or rapidly aggressive cancer after being clear of cancer after receiving multiple of these experimental investigational injections. We know in the literature from Doctor. Singh that the spike protein binds to the p 53 gene, which is the guardian of our genome. When that goes awry, cancer pathways can open up. There are countless pathways of harm that are caused by the spike protein. My concern is not just this shot in the spike protein, but halting all lipid nanoparticle and mRNA platforms both in human beings and in our animals, in veterinary, use as well as we have no long term safety studies for any of these products. We know the lipid nanoparticles themselves both in the Pfizer as well as in the Moderna canteen, lipids within the nanoparticles where it is clearly stated, ALC 159, ALC 135, SM 102 are indicated in the material safety data sheet. These products are not for human or veterinary use. These are not for human or veterinary use and yet they went into over 5,000,000,000 human beings. We know in the J and J, which was quietly pulled from the market by the CDC recently, And it also contains 2 hydroxyproposyl, beta cyclodextrin, which is known to be carcinogenic in animals. We are seeing, hiding of information by the NIH, Doctor. Eric Fried, as well as Oliver Shildon, forced retraction of a paper by Doctor. Zheng et al that showed that these products cause, the inability for our body to repair breaks in our DNA. That is critical for cancer pathways. There are 490 pages by FOIA requests being held by the NIH, not allowing access to the information that the NIH knows in terms of these cancer pathways and why they caused this paper to be retracted when it was good solid science. We know by Doctor. Flossa et al out of the Netherlands early on after the rollout of these injections that they altered the ability of our immune system, urinate immune system to function properly. The function of your urinate immune system is critical in cancer prevention, not only interferon levels, but as well as your T cells that fight off cancer on a daily basis. We are seeing alarming trends, these products, not just the COVID products. And as my colleagues clearly indicated, these are not just contaminated products. These are adulterated products. They have DNA circular plasmid in them. These are adulterated products that should not be on the shelf in any pharmacy in Idaho, in any doctor's office in the state of Idaho. This has been confirmed by 3 labs in the world. We're working on it in my laboratory as well right now. There are so many carcinogenic mechanisms of action that these products can cause. These are all studies that should have done been done in animals before they ever went into a human body. I do sincerely apologize on behalf of science for those who have received these not knowing these things. This is informed consent. Informed consent should always happen. I know my time is short. I appreciate the opportunity to testify. You have the power at the local level. You have the power of constitutional sheriffs. You have the power to act on behalf of the wonderful citizens of Washington County where I enjoy going to the Fiddle Festival every year. You have the power to stand up for what's right scientifically. We've all been duped by a large system and a propaganda campaign. And, unfortunately, these products are out there. A lot of people have been harmed. We can stop the harm from going forward. I appreciate the opportunity. Thank you so much.
Four Canadian Doctors Discuss COVID Vaccine-Induced ‘Turbo-Cancers,’ ‘Sudden Deaths’ Amongst 90 Canadian Doctors – Sense Receptor News sensereceptornews.com

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

"THREE SEPARATE LABS ACROSS THE GLOBE HAVE NOW FOUND THAT THE MRNA VACCINES...ARE HEAVILY CONTAMINATED WITH...DNA PLASMIDS..." "THESE DNA PLASMIDS CAN INFECT THE E. COLI IN YOUR GUT AND MAKE YOUR GUT A PERPETUAL SPIKE FACTORY." Not only have the COVID injections not been properly trialed or manufactured, but, as Lindsay notes, there is now ample evidence that they are contaminated with DNA plasmids*. "Three separate labs across the globe have now found that the mRNA vaccines, both Pfizer and Moderna, are heavily contaminated with the DNA plasmids used to create the shots in large volume," Lindsay says. The toxicologist and molecular biologist adds that "The contamination was found in every vial tested in eight vials by [genomicist] Kevin McKernan [@Kevin_McKernan]; both the monovalent shots and the boosters." "In [the] Pfizer vaccines, these DNA plasmids are found to be present in one-third of the shot material, so this is not a slight contamination in the least," Lindsay says. She notes that "These DNA plasmids can infect the E. Coli in your gut and make your gut a perpetual spike factory." Lindsay also says that the COVID injections "have a human promoter from the SV40 virus**... [which] is a cancer-causing promoter that allows these plasmids to also infect our human cells." The toxicologist adds that "the promoter also has a localization signal that allows it to go to the nucleus of cells making it more likely that there will be a genomic integration of that from these shots" and that "this most often results in cancers." The toxicologist notes yet another issue with this plasmid contamination, which is that the plasmids carry two antibiotic-resistant genes, which means "anybody injected with these contaminated shots could become antibiotic resistant to... two major classes of antibiotics." *A plasmid is a small circular DNA molecule found in bacteria and some other microscopic organisms: https://www.genome.gov/genetics-glossary/Plasmid *Hear more about how DNA plasmids are used to make the COVID injections from academic neurobiologist Jay Couey here: **The polyomavirus simian virus 40 (SV40) is a known oncogenic DNA virus that induces primary brain and bone cancers, malignant mesothelioma, and lymphomas. Source: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC452549/

Video Transcript AI Summary
Jansy Chun Lindsey, a toxicologist and molecular biologist, highlights the contamination of COVID mRNA vaccines. Three labs have discovered that both Pfizer and Moderna vaccines are heavily contaminated with DNA plasmids used in their production. These plasmids, designed to infect E. Coli, are not supposed to be present in the shots and increase the risk of genomic integration and anaphylaxis. The plasmids can infect the gut, potentially causing perpetual spike production, and carry a cancer-causing promoter. Additionally, they contain antibiotic-resistant genes, posing a risk of antibiotic resistance. The plasmids can be shed and transmitted to others, as seen in lab workers in Seattle. Lindsey urges an immediate recall of the vaccines and a ban on their use until further research is conducted.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: My name is Jansy Chun Lindsey. I'm a toxicologist and a molecular biologist with over 30 years of scientific experience, including vaccine development experience. Molecular biology is the study of DNA, RNA, and proteins, and I have a doctorate level degree in this. I appreciate you're allowing me to speak on the urgent issue of the contamination of the COVID mRNA genetic vaccines. 3 separate labs across the globe have now found that the mRNA vaccines, both Pfizer and Moderna are heavily contaminated with the DNA plasmids used to create the shots. The contamination was found in every vial tested of 8 files by genomicist Kevin McKernan, both the monovalent shots and the boosters. The contaminating DNA plasmas are designed to infect e coli in which they are grown in large volumes. They are supposed to be separated away from the shot and the code that's injected into you as their presence introduces DNA that is not allowed in the shots and which increases the risk of genomic integration in anaphylaxis. In Pfizer vaccines, these DNA plasmids are found to be present at up to 1 third of the shot material. So, this is not a slight contamination in the least. These DNA plasmids can infect the E. Coli in your gut and make your gut a perpetual spike factory. They also have a human promoter from the SV40 virus. Those of us who are old enough to have received the polio vaccine, you'll remember that some of those vaccines were contaminated with the s v forty, virus. This is a cancer causing promoter that allows these plasmids to also infect our human cells. The promoter also has a localization signal that allows it to go to the nucleus of cells, making it more likely that there will be a genomic integration event from these shots. This most often results in cancers. Cancers of various form. An additional serious issue with the plasma contamination is that they carry 2 antibiotic resistant genes to kanamycin and neomycin. These are 2 major antibiotics that we use in medicine today. Kanamycin is used to treat tuberculosis, and Neomycin is a broad spectrum antifungal that most of us use, and triple antibiotic. These are used in hospitals all over the country today, and we have many immigrants coming across our border border that are carrying tuberculosis. The potential consequence of this is that anybody injected with these contaminated shots could become antibiotic resistant to those 2 major classes of antibiotic of antibiotics. The potential consequence of these plasmids being injected into billions of people carrying these genes is that they can also be shed. As workers in Seattle showed, there were lab workers working with COVID in Seattle that became contaminated with the plasmids that they were working with. The plasmids infected their nasal cavities. They took these plasmids home and shed them to their family members. They were found because the lab workers remained positive for COVID for several months, and they couldn't figure out why they kept testing positive for COVID. It was because they were carrying these plasmids in their nasal cavities, and they did pass them on to their family members. This is a very, very serious matter and has been brought up to the FDA and CDC several months ago but they have not responded in any manner at all. Typically, this type of contamination would get the shots pulled off of the market immediately. We have seen an egregious number of deaths and disabilities that Laura discussed and and some of my colleagues will further discuss, we are up to over 35,000 deaths in the CDC VAERS system. These may be in part due to this contamination. This could also be an explanation for why the spike proteins and the mRNA have been found so far out from inoculation, what some people are calling long COVID, and found in tissues of the brain and the testes many months out from inoculation. MRNA is already being proposed to be used in cattle and has been used in swine since 2018 without our knowledge and without our permission. Historically, the genetic vaccines and the gene therapy had never been brought to market because of the severe adverse effects, including multiple cancers and lethal autoimmune reactions. These issues had not been resolved when they rolled out this genetic vaccine platform to billions of people. I know as a molecular biologist they had not been resolved. We are asking for an immediate recall of these vaccines due to these significant dangers. The contamination of the shots and the adulteration of the shots, including the degradation of the mRNA which has also been found the risks they pose to others through shedding, and being passed on through the germline to the next generation, as inadvertent gene transfer. We are asking that the entire platform be banned in food, agriculture, and especially for human use until further research can be done.
Plasmid A plasmid is a small, often circular DNA molecule found in bacteria and other cells. genome.gov
Emergent Human Pathogen Simian Virus 40 and Its Role in Cancer The polyomavirus simian virus 40 (SV40) is a known oncogenic DNA virus which induces primary brain and bone cancers, malignant mesothelioma, and lymphomas in laboratory animals. Persuasive evidence now indicates that SV40 is causing infections in humans ... ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

"I'VE SEEN A MASSIVE INCREASE IN MISCARRIAGE, INFERTILITY, FETAL ANOMALIES, FETAL CHROMOSOMAL ABNORMALITIES, FETAL DEATH, AND EVERY OTHER COMPLICATION IN PREGNANCY YOU CAN IMAGINE." In his testimony, Thorp, a board-certified obstetrician-gynecologist who has 44 years of obstetrical experience and specializes in maternal-fetal medicine, notes that what he's seen amongst the pregnant women whom he treats since the rollout of the COVID injections has been "extraordinarily disturbing." "I've seen a massive increase in miscarriage, infertility, fetal anomalies, fetal chromosomal abnormalities, fetal death, and every other complication in pregnancy you can imagine," Thorp says. He adds that he believes this is the deadliest drug "ever rolled out in the history of medicine," bar none. Thorp, who has been an impassioned and outspoken critic of the COVID injections, adds that "you don't use novel substances—ever—in pregnancy," yet health authorities have broken this "golden rule." As a result, he says that what he's seen are "the greatest, colossal, catastrophic problems" he's ever encountered in his career. In at least one previous interview, Thorp discussed just some of the horrors he's read about in this context, as well as seen in his own clinical practice, including "[a] massive number of pregnant losses [and]... [a] massive number of malformations [in babies], including absent brains, absent skulls, absent eyes, severe rib malformations, and the like..." Hear more about those malformations due to the COVID injections here: Hear more about an increase in miscarriages since the rollout of the COVID injections from another OB-GYN here: https://sensereceptornews.com/?p=19778

Video Transcript AI Summary
Dr. James Thorpe, a board-certified maternal fetal medicine and OBGYN physician, discusses the concerning increase in pregnancy complications such as miscarriage, infertility, fetal anomalies, and chromosomal abnormalities. He presents data showing the high number of deaths associated with a drug that was rolled out despite being known as the most dangerous in medical history. Dr. Thorpe reveals that the Department of Health and Human Services, CDC, FDA, and medical boards were aware of the risks but chose to bury the information due to financial interests. He emphasizes that using novel substances in pregnancy goes against the golden rule of medicine and highlights the catastrophic problems caused by this drug. The American College of OB GYN's narrative is driven by financial motives, as they would have to repay millions of dollars if they change their stance.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: James a Thorpe. And I am a board certified maternal fetal medicine physician, and a board certified OBGYN physician, in good standing. I've been practicing for about 40 almost exactly 44 years now. What I've seen in pregnancy is extraordinarily disturbing. I've seen a massive increase in miscarriage, in fertility, fetal anomalies, fetal chromosomal abnormalities, fetal death, and every other complication in pregnancy you could imagine. And I share my screen. Ms. Demeray has been kind enough to provide you with a thumb drive of some relevant articles, of which I will leave you with. I'm gonna share my screen. I think you can, I'll say our children. There we go. I think The slides are in the back of the our children. So, I just you must be wondering what in the world is going on here and how could this have ever happened in this once great country that we have? Well, Let me give it to you straightforward. The reason why it happened was that the Department of Health and Human Services through the CDC after knowing that this was the most dangerous drug ever rolled out in the history of medicine. And here it is right in front of you. This is 10 weeks of data, 12 23 dead. They knew that's February 2021. CDC knew it, the FDA knew it, HHS knew it and the American College of OB GYN and all the medical boards knew it. Unfortunately, they made an evil decision. This was a $1,000,000,000,000 industry, a cash cow ad infinitum. They didn't want to give it up. So in their minds, They tried to bury it for 75 years. This is what they tried to bury, the most deadliest lethal drug, call it whatever you want, Drug injection vaccine, which it's not, whatever you want to call it, the deadliest drug ever rolled out in the history of medicine, over 122 dead per week. So in February, what they did was, do they come straight with you? Do they come straight with the American people? Really the global population. No, they didn't come straight. They didn't come straight at all. What they did was they launched a $13,000,000,000 psychological operations to convince the world, convince Americans that this was not only safe to roll out generally, but it's safe in pregnancy. Now, my wife and research assistant and co researcher Maggie Thorpe just obtained a FOIA request of over 1300 pages, 1400 pages of which 50% were redacted. They captured the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology along with 2 98 other sectors of our society, $13,000,000,000 when they knew it was the deadliest drug and they put out the false narrative that this is safe, affected and necessary in pregnancy. They've broken the golden rule of pregnancy we have never before ever in the history of medicine, broken the golden rule of pregnancy. And you don't have to be a doctor to know this. You know it legislators, Doctors know it, kindergarten graduates know it, we are given that knowledge from our creator, you don't use novel substances ever in pregnancy. And what I've seen is the greatest colossal catastrophic problems that I've ever seen in my career. And they're still pushing it to this day because we have proof that if the American College of OB GYN changes their narrative and doesn't push it in pregnancy, They'll have to pay back every penny and they've received well over $11,000,000 and we have proof of
OB-GYN Says She’s Seen 100% Increase in Miscarriage Rate in Her Practice Since the COVID-19 ‘Vaccine’ Rollout – Sense Receptor News sensereceptornews.com

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

THERE HAS BEEN A "MASSIVE NUMBER OF PREGNANT LOSSES. [A] MASSIVE NUMBER OF MALFORMATIONS, INCLUDING ABSENT BRAINS, ABSENT SKULLS, ABSENT EYES, SEVERE RIB MALFORMATIONS, AND THE LIKE..." Thorp also highlights what he's seen in the reproductive toxicology studies analyzing the…

Video Transcript AI Summary
After 40 years of studying reproductive toxicology, I always refer to these studies when unsure about a drug. The findings are shocking, with numerous cases of pregnancy loss and severe malformations such as missing brains, skulls, and eyes, as well as rib abnormalities. If any of these issues are present in a reproductive toxicology study, I would never prescribe the drug under any circumstances.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You know, I I've been looking at reproductive toxicology studies lab for 40 years. That's the first thing I do when I see a drug that I'm not sure about and don't have a lot of experience with. I go immediately. And what they found in these studies was unbelievable. Massive number of pregnant losses, a massive number of malformations, including absent brains, absent skulls, absent eyes, severe rib malformations, and the like. So this if I saw any of those in any reproductive toxicology study. I would never prescribe the drug, period. No ifs, ands, or buts about it. So

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

Watch all of the experts' testimonies, as well as the Q&A portion of the presentation, here: https://www.bitchute.com/video/D9g8zKIMij2u/

We the People 50 Recall the Shots - Testimony to Washington County, Idaho Commissioner Testimony includes Janci Lindsay, PhD, Peter McCullough MD, Ryan Cole, MD, James Thorpe, MD, Sasha Latypova. Proposed resolution to ban the shots under Idaho bioweapons prohibition laws. bitchute.com
GlobalHProject
Posted - September 18, 2023 at 12:43 AM
Saved - September 18, 2023 at 2:02 AM

@GlobalHProject - Global Health Project

Awesome state senate testimony on possible mechanism of harm within #COVID19 platform. The dam is breaking

@TheChiefNerd - Chief Nerd

🚨 MUST WATCH: Cancer Genomics Expert Dr. Phillip Buckhaults Testifies to the SC Senate on the DNA Contamination Found in mRNA COVID Vaccines "The Pfizer vaccine is contaminated with plasmid DNA, it's not just mRNA...I'm kind of alarmed about the possible consequences of…

Video Transcript AI Summary
Philip Buchholz, a biochemistry and molecular biology expert, discusses concerns about the Pfizer vaccine. He explains that the vaccine contains DNA contamination, which could have serious consequences such as autoimmune attacks and potential cancer risks. Buchholz emphasizes that the DNA can integrate into cells and become a permanent fixture, unlike RNA or proteins. He suggests conducting tests on vaccinated individuals to determine if the DNA is integrating into their genomes. Buchholz calls for regulatory oversight to address this issue and remove the DNA from future vaccine versions. He believes the contamination was likely an oversight rather than intentional.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: For those of you don't don't don't know me, my name is Philip Buchholz. I'm a, I have a PhD in biochemistry and molecular biology. I'm a cancer gene jock. Basically, I do cancer genomics research at the University of South Carolina and what that means is that I'm kind of an expert on all the ways that the human genome can get futzed with during your lifetime and which of those things cause cancer and which ones don't, okay. That means that I'm very very skilled in in the art of DNA sequencing, okay. I can figure out the sequence of things that I didn't know what I was looking and I'm also pretty good, when I say I, I mean the people in my laboratory, you're not going to hear their names but there's a group of people that do this excellent work. We're really good at, detecting foreign pieces of DNA in places where they're not supposed to be even if they're real low levels. And we used those skills during the pandemic, to we invented the COVID test that many of you did, the spit test. Okay, that came out of my lab because we were really good at that kind of stuff and so I've earned a fair amount of Respect, in the state of South Carolina and in this body because we did a ton of Covid testing in the middle I'm a I'm a kid. The night when people were afraid and we told them no, you don't have COVID in your home or yes, you do. So, my qualifications to comment on this are both technical and kind of relational in the state of South Carolina. I'll cut to a very narrow theme here but it does touch on lots of these regulatory and I'll leave it to you to expand on those if you want to. I'll try to stay in this narrow lane, of some problems in the Pfizer vaccine, as a case study for places in which regulatory oversight could be improved, all right. So, first of all, let Say that my interpretation of the literature is that the Pfizer vaccine did a pretty good job of keeping keeping people from dying, but it did a terrible job of stopping the pandemic. The early publications showed that, it stopped infection, but that only lasted for like a month. Speaker 1: Doctor. Burkhard, could you pull the mic a little closer to you? Staff is telling me they're having trouble getting you on the recording. Speaker 0: Okay. Okay. Thank you. In in my professional evaluation of the literature, the Pfizer vaccine did a pretty good job at keeping people out of the cemetery, But it sucked at stopping the pandemic and, it was the best of sucky options that we had and I still believe that it was deployed mostly in good faith But there were a lot of shortcuts taken because the house was on fire and, we could do a better job next time from the lessons that we're gonna learn here. That's my own I'm a view of this, but I'm also my philosophical bent here is, I'm sure many of you have heard of Occam's Razor, Right? Choose the simplest of explanations. Well, there's another one called Hanlon's razor, which is never attribute malice to that which can be better explained by incompetence. And So, I'm trying to be gracious here in many circumstances. There could be malice underneath but I'm trying to see just incompetence to be gracious. So, the Pfizer vaccine is contaminated with plasma DNA. It's Not just m R N A, it's got bits of DNA in it. This DNA is the DNA vector that was used as the template for the in vitro transcription reaction when they made the m r n a. I know this is true because I sequenced it in my own lab. The vials of Pfizer vaccine that were out here in Columbia. One of my colleagues was in charge of that vaccination program in the college of pharmacy and for reasons I'm a I'm a case, and so I still don't understand he kept every single vial. So he had a whole freezer full of the empty vials. Well, the empty vials have a little tiny bit in the bottom of them. He gave them all to I'm a I'm a king. And I sequenced all the DNA that was in the vaccine and I can see what's in there and it's surprising that there's any DNA in there I'm a I'm a and you can kinda work out what it is and how it got there and I'm kind of alarmed about the possible consequences of this, Both in terms of human health and biology, but you should be alarmed about the regulatory process that allowed it Get there. So this DNA in my view, it could be causing some of the rare but serious side I'm a I'm a kid of fix like death from cardiac arrest. There's a lot of cases now, of people having suspicious death after vaccine. It's Hard to prove what caused it, it's just, you know, temporally associated, and this DNA is a plausible mechanism, Okay. This DNA, can and likely will integrate into the genomic DNA of cells that I'm a I'm a got transfected with the vaccine mix. This is just the way it works. We do this in the lab all the time. We take pieces of DNA, we mix them up with a lipid complex like the Pfizer vaccine is in. We pour it onto cells and and a lot of it gets into the cells and a lot of it gets into the DNA of those cells and it becomes a permanent fixture of the cell. It's not just a temporary, a temporary thing. It is in that cell and all of its progeny from now on forevermore. Amen. So that's why I'm kind of alarmed about this DNA being in the vaccine. It's it's it's different from because it can be permanent. This is a real hazard for genome modification of long lived somatic cells like stem I'm a I'm a cells, and it could cause, theoretically, this is all a theoretical concern, but it's pretty reasonable based on solid molecular biology, kid. That it could cause a sustained autoimmune attack toward that tissue. It's also a very real theoretical risk of future cancer in some people. Depending on where in the genome this foreign piece of DNA lands, it can interrupt a tumor suppressor or activate an I think it'll be rare, but I think the risk is not zero and it may be high enough that we are to figure out if this is happening or not. And again, the autoimmunity thing is not my wheelhouse. I'm not an immunologist, but the cancer risk is. That's my bag. I know this is a thing and it is Possibility. Okay, a little nerdy science here, the central dogma of molecular biology is that DNA gets transcribed into RNA, okay? And then RNA gets translated into protein. This is just how life runs. Why Why does this matter? Well, DNA, for the purposes of this discussion, DNA is a long lived information storage device. Okay. What you were born with, you're gonna die with and pass on to your kids. DNA lasts for 100 of 1000 of years, and it can last for I'm a I'm a generations if you can pass it on to your kids. Right? So alterations to the DNA, they stick around. R k. By its nature, it's temporary. It doesn't last and that feature of RNA was part of the sales pitch for the vaccine. The pseudo uridine was supposed to make the RNA last a little bit longer, but still it's a transient We're talking hours to days, okay. And then proteins, once proteins are made they also don't last Forever, they they last for hours to days. But something that makes its way into DNA has the potential to last for a very long time maybe a lifetime. So, this is a picture of the sequencing read that the sequencing run that I did in the lab, from a couple of batches of the Pfizer vaccine and all those little bitty lines here are the little tiny pieces of DNA that are in the vaccine. They don't belong care. They're not part of the sales pitch or the marketing campaign and they're there. There's a lot of them. This little graph here in the middle is the size distribution that around a 100 base pairs, 120 base pairs, so the the DNA pieces that are in the vaccine are short little pieces, 100, 120. There's some that are about 500 base pairs, a few that are even 5,000, but most of them are around a 100 base pairs. Why is this important? Because the probability of a DNA piece of DNA integrating into the human genome is unrelated to its size. So your genome risk is just a function of how many particles there are. So it's Like, you know, if you shoot a shotgun at a washboard, if you shoot a slug, you have some probability of hitting it. And if you shoot buckshot, you have a bigger probability of hitting it Some shot, right? All these little pieces of DNA that are in the vaccine are analogous to buckshot. You have Many many thousands of opportunities to modify a cell of a vaccinated person. The pieces are very small because during the process, they chopped them up to try to make them go away, but they actually increased the hazard of genome modification in I'm I'm a I'm a I'm a I'm a oversight that happened at the federal level and somebody should force this to happen somewhere. Speaker 1: Doctor Bocall, if you allow, Are you capable of doing that? Speaker 0: Yeah. It's we do that kind of thing. But in order for it to be trustworthy, it by the public, this has be done by lots of people. Right. Speaker 1: I'll talk to you more about that later. Speaker 0: Yeah. This is our our deal. This is why I know this should have been done at the federal level. Okay. Kid. So we took all these pieces of DNA and we used them to glue together what the source DNA must have Ken. This is kind of again, this is our what we do in the lab all the time and and all these little little grid and green lines here, these are all independent little cancer of DNA. This must have had a 100,000 pieces of DNA in this this sequencing run and you can put them all back and see what they came from is this circle over here. It's a plasmid that you can go shopping online to buy from Agilent And it's clear that Pfizer, took this plasmid and then they cloned spike into it, And they used it for in a process called in vitro transcription translation, in vitro transcription, where you feed an RNA polymerase, this plasmid and it makes a whole bunch of m r n a copies for you. Okay? And then you take this m r n a, you mix it with the the lipid nano particle I'm a I'm a They did they did make some effort to chop it up, so all these little pieces of the plasma got packaged in with the r n a. That's clear as day what happened Just from the forensics of looking at the DNA sequencing, okay? A little bit of a regulatory note here, the way you do RNA transcription, in vitro transcription reactions, you have to give it a DNA template, okay, and you can give it a DNA template that is just a synthetic piece of DNA that is only the instructions to make d r n a and that's what was done for getting the emergency use authorization and the clinical trial. That's called process one, if you look up that kind of kid. They made a PCR product of just the bits that they wanted and then they did the in vitro transcription, made a bunch of RNA of that. There was no plasma DNA scale the way that was necessary to vaccinate the whole world. So a cheaper way to scale up the production of this template is to clone that PCR product into this plasmid vector, put the plasmid vector into bacteria and then grow up big vats of the bacteria. They make a lot of the plasma DNA for you, then you use I'm a I'm a Set plasma DNA as the template to drive this transcription reaction to make your RNA. Contamination ended up in the production batches even though it was not in the stuff that was used for the authorization trials. So I know it's a little bit of nerdy science, but it has regulatory implications for for you guys. Kid. We can we can measure the quantity of this stuff pretty easy in the lab. This is we're we're good at doing this kind of stuff. This is same, we made a little PC. A colleague of mine at at MIT made, you know, from who who used to work for the the Broad Institute at MIT, He he made a little, PCR test and we cloned it here. This is similar to the PCR test that you all took for the spit test. Okay? Same same idea and same expertise behind it and we can quantify exactly how much of this stuff is in a vaccine or any other tissue Q and you know, I estimate that there were about 2,000,000,000 copies of the 1 piece that we're looking for in every dose. And if you look back at that map I showed you where it's all these little the the little piece that we're looking for It's just that little bit right there, okay? But if you see 2,000,000,000 copies of this, there's about 200,000,000,000 of everything else. So what this means is that there's probably about 200,000,000,000 pieces of this plasma DNA in each dose of the vaccine and it's encapsulated in this lipid nano So, it's ready to be delivered inside the cell, okay? This is a bad idea. My Conclusions from this, we should check a bunch of people. I'm from this or I should learn how to run PowerPoint. We should check a bunch of vaccinated people kid. Getting tissue samples, especially if we focus on harmed people, but that's not necessary. We could also just focus on regular unharmed people and see if this plasmid DNA is integrating into the genomes of any of their Stem cells. It leaves a calling card that is there. One of the reasons why I'm focusing on this is because I'm a I'm a It's kinda different from a lot of the other imagined harms where you can't really prove it. You can be suspicious because of the timing, but you can't Prove it. This one you can prove it because it leaves a calling card, okay? You find it in the stem cells I'm a I'm a of harmed people, it's equivalent to finding a certain type of lid in someone who is now dead. It's pretty cannibal Reasonable to assume that that's what caused it. The royal we, meaning you guys, should insist that the FDA force I'm a I'm a Pfizer to get the DNA out of the booster and all future versions of this vaccine. I'm a real fan of this platform, Okay. I think it has the potential to treat cancers. I really believe that this platform I'm a I'm a is revolutionary and in your lifetime, there will be m r n a vaccines against I'm a I'm a in your unique cancer, okay, and but they gotta get this problem fixed, okay. And I and I right now, I think the financial incidents are too great to just I'm a I'm a keep on rolling with it and it's gonna take some encouragement to get it out. I'm a I'm a Regulation that allowed this DNA to be there in the 1st place. I don't think that this the amounts there actually exceed the regulation limits. In some batches, it may. I'm a I'm a In in the 2 batches that I looked at, one of them, it was just under the limit and one it was just over the limit. My colleague in Boston has looked I'm a I'm a looked at a fair number of other batches and there's a handful that are super high and there's a handful that are super low, but the fact that there is a regulatory threshold for amount of allowed in a vaccine is a throwback to an era when we were talking about vaccines that were like a recombinant protein That you or a dead virus, you know, attenuated virus produced in in C H O cells or something like that. And the DNA that might I'm a I'm a in it is naked DNA and you might have a little bit of it in the vaccine. That's not a problem because naked DNA gets I'm a I'm a Chewed up immediately upon vaccination and there's no real mechanism for it to get inside the cells. They inappropriately applied that regulatory limit I'm a I'm a kid. To this new kind of vaccine where everything is encapsulated in this lipid nano particle, it's basically packaged in a synthetic virus able to dump its contents into a Kell. So I'm thinking Hanlon's razor here, okay? I don't think there was anything nefarious here. I think it was just kind of a dumb oversight kid. And it's gonna take because the financial incentives are so great to just, you know, sweep it under the rug and the Career incentives of people that approve this are going to be, there's nothing wrong here, you know, it's going to take some encouragement to make people prove that it's okay. And who knows? Maybe we'll check a bunch of people and we'll find out for sure that this is indeed not a problem And that will do the public good if we prove that
RefugeOfSinner5
Posted - September 18, 2023 at 1:37 AM
Saved - September 18, 2023 at 6:53 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The Pfizer vaccine contains plasmid DNA alongside mRNA. This DNA serves as the template for mRNA production. Professor Phillip Buckhaults, a renowned expert in cancer genomics, sequenced the vaccine and confirmed the presence of foreign DNA. A clip from a South Carolina Senate Hearing provides further evidence. Watch here: [link].

@RefugeOfSinner5 - RefugeOfSinners (ROS)

"The Pfizer vaccine is contaminated with plasmid DNA, it's not just mRNA, its got bits of DNA in it. This DNA is the DNA vector that was used as the template for the invitro transcription reaction when they made the mRNA. I know this is true because I sequenced it in my own lab" Professor Phillip Buckhaults. Phd in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. He does cancer genomics research at the University of South Carolina. An expert on which changes to the genome causes cancer. His team is really good at detecting foreign pieces of DNA in places where they are not supposed to be.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The Pfizer vaccine may contain DNA in addition to mRNA, according to a scientist who sequenced the vaccine in their lab. The DNA is a vector used in the production of the mRNA. The scientist examined vials of the vaccine from a local vaccination program and found DNA in them. This DNA could potentially be linked to rare but serious side effects, such as death from cardiac arrest. It has the ability to integrate into the genomic DNA of cells, potentially causing long-term effects. The presence of this DNA raises concerns about the regulatory process that allowed it to be included in the vaccine. There is a theoretical risk of autoimmune reactions and future cancer development. Further investigation is needed to determine the extent of these risks.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Handlawns razor, which is never attribute malice to that which can be better explained by incompetence. And so I'm trying to be gracious here in many circumstances, there could be malice underneath but I'm trying to see just incompetence to be gracious. So The Pfizer vaccine is contaminated with plasma DNA, it's not just mRNA, it's got bits of DNA in it. This DNA is the DNA vector that was used when they made the mRNA. I know this is true because I sequenced it in my own lab. The vials of Pfizer vaccine that were given out here in Columbia. One of my colleagues was in charge of that vaccination program in the College of Pharmacy and for reasons that I still don't understand, he kept every single vial. So he had a whole freezer full of the empty vials, well the empty vials have a little tiny bit in the bottom of them, he gave them all to me and I looked at them. We had 2 batches that were given out here in Columbia and I checked these 2 batches and I checked them by sequencing, and I sequence all the DNA that was in the vaccine, and I can see what's in there. And it's surprising that there's any DNA in there, and you can kinda work out what it is and how it got there, here and I'm kind of alarmed about the possible consequences of this, both in terms of human health health in biology, but you should be alarmed about the regulatory process that allowed it to get there. So this DNA, in my view, It could be causing some of the rare but serious side effects like death from cardiac arrest. So there's a lot of cases now, and this DNA is a plausible mechanism, okay. And will integrate into the genomic DNA of cells that got transfected with the vaccine mix. This is just the way We do this in the lab all the time. We take pieces of DNA, we mix them up with a a lipid complex like the Pfizer vaccine as in, we pour it on the cells and and a lot of it gets into the cells and a lot of it gets into the DNA of those cells and becomes a permanent fixture here of the cell. It's not just a temporary thing, it is in that cell and all of its progeny from now on forevermore. Him. So that's why I'm kind of alarmed about this DNA being in the vaccine, it's different from RNA because it can be permanent. This is a real hazard for genome modification of long lived somatic cells like stem cells, and it could cause, theoretically, this is all a theoretical concern but it's pretty reasonable based on solid molecular biology, that it could cause a sustained autoimmune attack toward that tissue. It's also a very real theoretical risk of future cancer in some people depending on where in the genome this foreign piece of DNA lands, it can interrupt a tumor suppressor or activate an Kajim. I think it'll be rare but I think the risk is not zero and it may be high enough that we are to figure out if this is happening or not. And again, the The autoimmunity thing is not my wheelhouse, I'm not an immunologist but the cancer risk is, that's my bag, I know this is a thing and it is a possibility.

@RefugeOfSinner5 - RefugeOfSinners (ROS)

This clip was taken from a South Carolina Senate Hearing. The full video can be seen here. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IEWHhrHiiTY

freedomonfire
Posted - September 18, 2023 at 1:05 PM
Saved - December 7, 2023 at 11:57 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
DNA contamination has been discovered in mRNA COVID vaccines, according to cancer genomics expert Dr. Phillip Buckhaults. He testified to the South Carolina Senate, highlighting that the Pfizer vaccine contains plasmid DNA alongside mRNA. This contamination could potentially lead to serious side effects like cardiac arrest and autoimmune attacks. Additionally, there is a theoretical risk of future cancer. Each vaccine dose may contain around 200 billion pieces of this plasmid DNA.

@freedomonfire - Freedom On Fire

🚨BREAKING: DNA Contamination Found in mRNA COVID Vaccines Cancer Genomics Expert, Dr. Phillip Buckhaults, testified to the South Carolina Senate on the DNA Contamination Found in mRNA COVID Vaccines. Dr. Buckhaults and his team are the inventors of the COVID-19 spit test that was used nationally during the pandemic. Some quotes from the clip: "The Pfizer vaccine is contaminated with plasmid DNA, it's not just mRNA." "It could be causing some of the rare, but serious, side effects like death from cardiac arrest." "It could cause a sustained autoimmune attack towards that tissue. It's also a very real theoretical risk of future cancer.." "There's probably about 200 billion pieces of this plasmid DNA in each dose of the vaccine.."

Video Transcript AI Summary
Philip Buchholtz, a cancer genomics researcher, discusses his concerns about the Pfizer vaccine. He explains that the vaccine contains DNA, which has the potential to integrate into cells and cause long-term effects, such as autoimmune reactions and cancer. Buchholtz conducted DNA sequencing on vaccine samples and found that there were millions of copies of DNA in each dose. He suggests that further research should be done to investigate the potential risks. Buchholtz believes that the inclusion of DNA in the vaccine was likely an oversight rather than intentional, but he emphasizes the need for regulatory oversight and proper evaluation of the vaccine's safety.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: My name is Philip Buchholtz. I'm a, I have a PhD in biochemistry and molecular biology. I'm a cancer gene jock. Basically, I do cancer genomics research at the University of South Carolina. What that means is that I'm kind of an expert on all the ways that the human genome can get fussed with during your lifetime and which which of those things cause cancer and which ones don't, okay? So technically, that means that I'm very, very skilled in in the art of DNA sequencing. Okay, I can figure out the sequence of things that I didn't know what I was looking for, and I'm also pretty good, when I say I, I mean, the people in my laboratory, You're not gonna hear their names but there's a group of people that do this excellent work. We're really good at, detecting foreign pieces of DNA in places where they're not supposed to be, even if they're at real low levels. And we used those skills during the pandemic. We invented the COVID test that many of you did a spit test. That came out of my lab because we were really good at that kind of stuff. In my professional evaluation literature. The Pfizer vaccine did a pretty good job at keeping the people out of the cemetery, but it sucked at stopping the pandemic. And I still believe that, it was deployed mostly in good faith, but there were a lot of shortcuts taken. I'm sure many of you have heard of Occam's razor, right? Choose the simplest of explanations. Well, there's another one called Hanlon's razor, which is never attributed malice to that which which can be better explained by incompetence. And so I'm trying to be gracious here in many circumstances. There could be malice underneath, but I'm trying to see just incompetence to be gracious. So, the Pfizer vaccine is contaminated with Asthma DNA. It's not just mRNA. It's got bits of DNA in it. This DNA is the DNA vector that was used the template for the in vitro transcription reaction when they made the mRNA. The vials of Pfizer vaccine that were given out here in Columbia, one of my colleagues was in charge of that vaccination program in the college of pharmacy and for reasons that I still don't understand, he kept every single vial. So he had a whole freezer full of the empty vials. Well, the empty vials have a little tiny bit in the bottom of them. He gave them all to me and I looked at them. We had 2 batches that were given out here in Columbia And I checked these 2 batches and I checked them by sequencing. And I sequenced all the DNA that was in the vaccine and I can And it's surprising that there's any DNA in there. And you can kind of work out what it is and how it got there. And I'm kind of alarmed about the Possible consequences of this, both in terms of human health and biology, but you should be alarmed about the regulatory process that allowed it to get there. So this DNA, in my view, it could be causing some of the rare but serious side effects like death from cardiac arrest. There's a lot of cases now of people having suspicious death after vaccine. It's hard to prove what It's just temporally associated. And this DNA is a plausible mechanism. This DNA can and likely will integrate into the genomic DNA of cells That got transfected with the vaccine mix. We do this in the lab all the time. We take pieces of DNA, we mix them up with a lipid complex like the Pfizer vaccine is in. We pour it onto cells and and a lot of it gets into the cells and a lot of it gets into the DNA of those cells and it becomes a permanent It's not just a temporary thing. It is in that cell and all of its progeny from now on forevermore. Amen. So that's why I'm kind of alarmed about this DNA being in the vaccine. It's it's it's different from RNA because it can be permanent. This It's a real hazard for genome modification of long lived somatic cells, like stem cells. It's all a theoretical concern, but it's pretty reasonable based on solid molecular biology. That it could cause a sustained autoimmune attack toward that tissue. It's also a very real theoretical risk of future cancer in some people. Depending on where in the genome this it's a very good question. I think it's a very good question. I think it's a very good question. I think it's a very good question. To figure out if this is happening or not. And again, the autoimmunity thing is not my wheelhouse. I'm not an immunologist, but Cancer risk is that's my bag. I know this is a thing and it is a possibility. Nerdy science here, the central dogma of molecular biology is that DNA gets transcribed into RNA, okay? And then RNA gets translated into protein. This is just how life runs. Why does this matter? Well, DNA, for the purposes of This discussion, DNA is a long lived information storage device. Okay? What you were born with, you're gonna die with and pass on to your kids. DNA lasts for 100 of 1000 of years, and it can last for generations if you can pass it on to your kids. Right? So alterations to the DNA, they stick RNA, by its nature, is temporary. It doesn't last. And that feature of RNA was other, the other, the other, the other, the other, the other, the other, the other, the other, the other, the other, the other, the other, the other, the other, the other, the other, the other, the other, the other, the other, the other, the other, the other, the other, Speaker 1: the other, the other, the other, the other, the other, the other, the other, the other, the other, the other, the other, the other, the other, the other, the other, the other, the Speaker 0: other, the other, the other, the other, the other, the other, the research that I do. I do the research that I do. Speaker 1: I do the research that I do. I do the Speaker 0: research that I do for hours to days. But something that makes its way into DNA has the potential to last for a very long time, maybe a lifetime. So, This is a picture of the sequencing read that, the sequencing run that I did, in the lab, from a couple of batches of the Pfizer vaccine. And all those little bitty lines here are the the last few years. I've been working on a lot of the work that I've done in the past, and I've been working on a lot of the work that I've done in the past, and I've been working on a lot of them. This little graph here in the middle is the size distribution that peaks around 100 base pairs, 120 base pairs. So the The DNA pieces that are in the vaccine are short little pieces. 100, 120. There's some that are about 500 base There's a few that are even 5,000, but most of them are around 100 base pairs. Why is this important? Because the probability of a piece of DNA integrating into the human genome is unrelated to its size. So your genome risk is just a function of how many particles there are. So it's like, you know, if you shoot a shotgun at a washboard, if you Allagas to buckshot. You have many, many thousands of opportunities to modify, a cell of a vaccinated person. The pieces are very small because during the process, they chopped them up to try to make them go away, but they It increased the hazard of genome modification in the process. That's how this got here. In my view, Somebody should go about sequencing DNA samples from stem cells of people who are vaccinated and find out If this theoretical risk has happened or not, I think this is a real serious oversight regulatory oversight that happened at the federal level and somebody should force this to happen somewhere. Yeah. It's we do that kind of But in order for it to be trustworthy, it by the public, this has to be done by lots of people. Right? Okay. I'll talk to you more about that later. Yeah. This is our our deal. This is why I know this should've been done at the federal level. And we use them to glue together what the source DNA must have been. Again, this is what we do in the lab all the time. And all these little red and green lines here, these are all independent little pieces of DNA. And you can put them all back together and see what they came from is this circle over here. It's a plasmid that you can go shopping online to buy from Agilent. And it's clear that Pfizer, took this plasmid and then they cloned Spike into it, and and they used it for in a process called in vitro transcription translation, where you feed, an RNA polymerase this plasmid and it makes a whole bunch of mRNA copies for you. Okay? And then you take this mRNA, you mix it with the lipid nanoparticle transfection reagent, and now you've got your mRNA a vaccine, but they failed to get the DNA out before they did this. So these little pieces, they did make some effort to chop it up. So all these little pieces The plasma got packaged in with the RNA. That's clear as day what happened just from the forensics of looking at the DNA sequencing. A little bit of a regulatory note here. The way you do RNA transcription, in vitro transcription reactions, you have to give it a DNA template. And you can give it a DNA template that is just a synthetic piece of DNA That is only the instructions to make the RNA. And that's what was done for getting the, CEUs authorization, and a clinical trial. It's called Process One, if you look up that kind of stuff. They made a PCR product of just the bits that they wanted and Then they did the in vitro transcription, made a bunch of RNA of that. There was no plasma DNA to contaminate the stuff that was used for the trial. But making that PCR The PCR product doesn't scale the way that was necessary to vaccinate the whole world. So a cheaper way to scale up the production of this It is to clone that PCR product into this plasma vector, put the plasma vector into bacteria, and then grow up big vats of the bacteria. They Make a lot of the plasma DNA for you, then you use that plasma DNA as the template to drive this transcription reaction to make your RNA. Not in the stuff that was used for the authorization trials. So I know it's a little bit of nerdy science, but it has We can measure the quantity of this stuff pretty easy in the lab. We're good at doing this stuff. This is the same. We made a little PC a colleague of mine at MIT who used to work for the Broad Institute at MIT, Same idea and same expertise behind it. And we can quantify exactly how much of this stuff is in a vaccine or any other tissue. And I estimate that there were about 2,000,000,000 copies of the 1 piece that we're looking for in every dose. And if you look back at that map I showed you where it's all these little the little piece of everything else. So what this means is that there's probably about 200,000,000,000 pieces of this plasma DNA in each dose of the vaccine. And it's encapsulated in this lipid nano particle So it's ready to be delivered inside the cell. This is a bad idea. My conclusions from this, we should check a bunch of people. Next question. I'm just curious if you could just and tissue samples, especially if we focus on harmed people. But that's not necessary. We could also just focus on regular, unharmed people And I'm a little bit confused about the fact that there. One of the reasons why I'm focusing on this is because it's kind of different from a lot of the other imagined harms where you Can't really prove it. You can be suspicious because of the timing, but you can't really prove it. This one, you can prove it because it leaves a calling card. You find it in the stem cells of harmed people. It's equivalent to finding a certain type of lead in someone who is now dead. It's pretty reasonable to assume that that's what caused it. The royal we, meaning you guys, other things that we're doing. And so we're I'm a real fan of this platform, okay? I think it has the potential to treat cancers. I really and right now, I think the financial incentives are too great to just keep on rolling with it and it's going to take some Encouragement to get it out. I don't think that the amounts there actually exceed the regulation limits. In some batches, it may. In the 2 batches that I looked at, one of them, it was just under the limit and one, it was just over the limit. My colleague in Boston has looked at a fair number of other batches. And there's a handful that are super high and there's a handful that are super low. But the fact that there is a regulatory threshold vaccines are like a recombinant protein or a dead virus, an attenuated virus produced in CHO cells or and the DNA that might be in it is naked DNA. And you might have a little bit of that in the vaccine. That's not a problem Because naked DNA gets chewed up immediately upon vaccination and there's no real mechanism for it to get inside the cells. They inappropriately applied that regulatory limit to this new kind of vaccine where everything is encapsulated in this lipid nanoparticle. It's basically packaged in a synthetic virus So I'm thinking Hanlon's razor here. Okay? I don't think there was anything nefarious here. I think it was just kind of a dumb oversight. And it's gonna take because the financial incentives are so great to just, you know, And the career incentives of people that approve this are going to be, there's nothing wrong here. It's going to take some encouragement to make people But I really believe this was an inappropriate application of an old school regulation.
DrNoMask
Posted - September 18, 2023 at 3:12 PM
Saved - September 20, 2023 at 2:29 AM

@DrNoMask - DrRay

"Please protect your citizens. We've got to get one state to stand up and do the right thing." Dr. Janci Lindsay full clip below

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker expresses concern about the safety of COVID-19 vaccines, particularly regarding the presence of DNA and contamination in the shots. They argue that the number of deaths reported after the vaccine rollout is higher than in the past 30 years combined for all other vaccines. The speaker also discusses the risk of gene therapy and the potential for cancer and autoimmune reactions. They mention the presence of SV40 sequences and antibiotic-resistant genes in the shots, which they believe is intentional. The speaker highlights the increase in miscarriages and stillbirths reported after vaccination and questions the transparency of the FDA and CDC. They urge for the recall of the vaccines and express frustration with the lack of action taken.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: FDA. I just sent them emails and said, hey. You wanna you should look in this. Okay. Speaker 1: Okay. Thank you so much. Next is doctor, Jancy Lindsey. I hope you can, Speaker 2: I hope you realize what a 0 spoken with many scientists about checking for this months months months ago? None of them would I spoke at the US Senate in December of 2002, about the risk of this being passed to our children because of it being reverse transcribed simply from the RNA before we knew that there was DNA in the shots. As As soon as I found out there was DNA in the shots, I went all over every social media platform I could get to And started ringing the alarm bell. Exactly. You don't have to play that at this point. I have little time so I'm gonna follow-up with what he said. Well, just show the ones their side. So I disagree with doctor Buckholson that I think that this is the most dangerous platform that has ever been released on mankind. That is very easy to see in the various database where you have more deaths, in just A couple months after the rollout than you have in the past 30 years for all the other vaccines combined. You would have to shrink that and go up. So there we go. So, these are all all the other vaccines for the past 30 years combined. And this is what happened Sorry. And this is what happened During COVID to deaths from vaccines, do you see? We're at over 35,000 deaths. Typically, you would get no more Then 200 deaths in a year for all 30 vaccine, or for all of the vaccines combined. This is the past 30 years Deaths from vaccines reported into the VAERS database. You've already heard earlier that this represents only 1 to 13% Of the cases that are normally reported, this is a safety signal. This is a safety signal. This is the platform itself, Okay, in the clinical trials, we saw deaths. We definitely had deaths. That was Using process 1 without the contamination. Okay. What may not have been clear is that the the shots tested on the people in the clinical trials were vastly different than the shots tested or given to people released on the population. I'm short I'm not on time, so I'm trying to fit this in. Basically, people were given in the clinical trial a clean shot. People, everybody else was given these contaminated shots. Every single file that's been tested by every scientist around the world is contaminated with these plasmids. And they're Osmids. And some are contaminated when Kevin McKernan first tested the vials, he found that one of the vials contained up to about 30% of the nucleic acid material was in fact DNA. So this is not some residual contamination that's carrying over. This is significant contamination. Why does that matter? Gene therapy was never brought to market even though it's been over 40 years in development because in the past it caused latent cancers that developed 2 to 4 years After these were given because it caused lethal autoimmune reactions even when you were producing human proteins, not viral proteins, not proteins not bacterial proteins that you are displaying on the surface of yourself. Think about the logic of this. In traditional gene therapies, and these are gene therapies, they would be classified as gene therapies. In traditional gene therapies, you send in A genetic message to make a missing protein. That protein is identical to the protein that Should have been in your body but you're missing. This time we're sending in a sequence and asking it to make a piece of a Viral protein and we're displaying it on ourselves and then our body is attacking it and killing those cells. It Doesn't stay in your arm, they said it would stay in your arm. It goes to every single cell in your body, every tissue in your body. It goes to your brain, it goes to your bone marrow. Where then your body is able to attack these cells. It is not a healthy The platform for this there's a difference between using this technology for cancer or for fixing inborn errors in metabolism As compared to using it in a vaccine. There you understand the risk. Here the risks were not told to people. With this DNA being present, what Philip did not touch on is that there are sequences within these plasmids. I personally feel That this is an intentional, I believe that there is nefarious intent. I'm going to tell you why and it's something that he didn't touch John, there are s v 40 sequences excuse me there are there are s SV 40 sequences within the plasmids that were not disclosed to the regulators. The SV 40 sequences, if you recall the SV 40 virus, Was a contaminant of the polio vaccines. It is thought that that contamination of the virus, which is on oncogenic, caused many of the cancers for the next several decades from the people in the people that receive these vaccines. Now the whole the whole s v 40 virus is not in the shots. But what is in the shots is a special sequence, it's called a nuclear localization sequence, which is In the shot, to take the plasma DNA directly to the nucleus of human cells, it is not not needed to grow these in bacteria. You would not have to use this to grow it in bacteria for the purpose that They said it was 4 to make lots of copies. This sequence takes the DNA to the nucleus of human cells Where it can then be integrated or where, as Philip said, it is most likely to be integrated. So All this about there's no DNA in the shots, they will not go to the nucleus, they will not integrate with your DNA is not true, and they knew it from the beginning because uh- They knew the plasmids were there. That's a problem. There's also an s v forty promoter only designed to be expressed in human cells, not bacteria cells. Now Philip has checked in something he didn't say, which is good news, For people, Doctor. Buchholz, I keep saying Philip, which is good news for people, is that most of the sequences were broken. Have they been intact? And if there are any that are intact, and this is something he should have said, we have to check. They can infect the e coli in your gut. That's what they're designed to do, to infect the e coli to to infect e coli, which means you can be actual spike factory because they're self replicating and they would self replicate in the bacteria of your gut and then make spike over and over and over again. That's a problem. They also carry an antibiotic resistant Dean Cassette, Takanomycin and Neomycin. Kanamycin is the main antibiotic used to treat tuberculosis. Neomycin is another antibiotic That's widely used. People that receive these, if it transfects the E. Coli in your gut, it can make that your gut and other bacteria, not just that. It can make them resistant to those antibiotics. That is a huge, huge risk. And it's something that's known for plasmids. It's something that they've they're careful to make sure that you don't have these Antibiotic resistance genes. If they're making something that should go into gene therapy and now it's here, now it's present. I've worked for several months to try to get these shots recalled completely recalled. They're dangerous. Excuse me, I need to get a drink of water, they're dangerous. We're injecting these in our kids. We don't inject contaminated medical products in our kids. Something Doctor. Buchholz didn't touch on as well. Is if there's that much plasmid in the shot, there's a very good chance that there's bacterial endotoxin in the shot. Which means bacterial proteins which Can cause anaphylaxis and even death. And that may be what caused some of the the rapid deaths that occurred right After people got these shots. There's so much more to touch on. We've seen massive cases of miscarriage Carriage and stillbirth. Normally, during years we wouldn't see more than 25 cases of miscarriage or still birth. For all the vaccines combined, in 2021 we saw 3,428 cases of Birth and miscarriage reported into the VAER system. Remember, no more than than 25 typically in a year is normal for All the vaccines combined. 3,428 in 2/20 1. In 2/22, we saw 15 25 stillbirth and miscarriage. Carriage. And in halfway through that year, the FDA or the CDC said they would stop reporting on One, they would stop making all their information public because they did not want to encourage vaccine hesitancy or misinformation or misinterpret Or misinformation or misinterpret misinterpretation of the data. So all of a sudden we saw what was What was going like this go like this in February. That's artificial. We can't even trust the data coming out of the the CDC anymore. The FDA The FDA knows about this contamination. They're not doing anything. I'm sorry this is so rushed. I just wanted to address what What doctor Buckholz was not able to. He and I have the same degrees. I have a degree in biochemistry and molecular biology, Gee, and I'm a toxicologist and an expert witness as a profession nationally and internationally. This is outrageous. I've never seen anything like this in my entire career. We have got to pull these shots and restrict them from our children. We cannot inject these into The babies and children. These are contaminated dangerous lethal products. I don't agree with Doctor. Buchholz, But I believe that he's just seeing a lot of this data. I feel like he is where Where we were 3 years ago. So, that's basically if I don't leave Now I won't catch my plane. May not catch it anyway. So Speaker 1: You had said earlier, nefarious. You felt like this was more nefarious than doctor Burkhold. In what sense are you saying that? Speaker 2: The s v forty sequences, they should Not be there. They don't need to be there to grow this into back to grow this in bacteria. I don't think it's an accident. They could They've chosen another plasmid that did not have the SV 40 sequences. If these sequences sit above an oncogene and and they're promiscuous, that means They are likely to integrate in places more likely than other genetic inserts. Thank you so much. Then they can cause cancer. Insertional mutagenesis anyway causes cancer. And that's the risk. That's why gene therapies were not brought to market for so many years. Because there was a risk of causing cancer from insertional mutagenesis. We never needed He did these vaccines. We had treatments that worked. One of our doctors here is going to tell you about Hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, I can tell you as a toxicologist, they are not toxic. They're they're some of the safest drugs you can use. I there's no reason once the FDA found out about this contamination, okay? And we looked to see endotoxin levels, but they've got them all redacted. Why would you redact them if you were trying to be transparent? Why would you hold The data for 75 years. All of the clinical data for 75 years from these, if you were trying to be transparent. Tell Tommy, why? There is something very unusual going on here that is being done differently than it's Ever been done before. We don't give experimental products to pregnant women. We don't give experimental products to Babies that have a death profile like this. It's not done. It's never been Done before. Please protect your citizens. Please, I am begging you to protect your citizens. We've got to get 1 state to stand up and do the right thing. Do whatever you can so that Other states will follow. I'm sorry. Speaker 1: Thank you, doctor, Lindsey. Any questions? Speaker 2: Again, sorry. I was a little urgent in that. I re scheduled my Uber twice. So Speaker 1: So it's just very difficult Speaker 2: to keep this, everything on schedule with him, but Speaker 1: thank you for staying so much. Thank you for staying, and thank you for presenting, and we appreciate it so much. Speaker 2: If you have any questions, please feel free to call. Speaker 1: We will be reaching out, I promise. Jean. Who's next? Speaker 0: Mister chairman, we passed over to meet, to meet time Obligations. We passed over, mister Rick Nagel, so it's probably time to call him up now. Speaker 1: Andrew Rick Nagel. Speaker 0: Is it Nog? Yeah. Nogel. Beg your pardon, sir.

@JanciToxDoc - Dr. Janci

My testimony at the SC Senate. I was a bit flustered. We were running very late on the schedule and I’d rescheduled my Uber twice. I barely made my flight. I am grateful that Dr. Buckhaults agreed to speak and was happy to share half my time with him. https://youtu.be/mjQQ7kkj3Bs?si=vYhRKIgsKz7j9mAc

c_plushie
Posted - September 19, 2023 at 2:34 AM
Saved - September 22, 2023 at 3:20 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The Pfizer shot may contain DNA contaminants that can permanently alter your genetic code and SV40 sequences that can infect your gut, causing cancer. Dr. Janci Lindsay and Dr. Phillip Buckhaults testified about these concerns. Watch their full testimonies. Researchers are alarmed by the DNA contamination in the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine.

@c_plushie - Coronavirus Plushie

🧵 THREAD DNA & SV40 In The #Pfizer Shot Dr. Janci Lindsay & Dr. Phillip Buckhaults testify that the Pfizer shot has been found to be contaminated with DNA, which can permanently alter your genetic code, and SV40 sequences which can infect the E.coli in your gut, turning you into a 'perpetual spike factory' as well as cause cancer. This video has excerpts from the testimonies of Dr. Janci Lindsay and Dr. Phillip Buckhaults. Please watch their full testimonies which I've posted in the thread below. @P_McCulloughMD @JesslovesMJK @DrJBhattacharya @DrAseemMalhotra @nzdsos @winstonpeters @HopeRising19 @mattletiss7 @NickHudsonCT 🔊

Video Transcript AI Summary
A biochemist and toxicologist discusses concerns about the Pfizer vaccine. They claim that the vaccine contains plasma DNA, including SV40 sequences, which were not disclosed to regulators. They believe this is intentional and could lead to DNA integration and potential cancer risks. The speaker argues that the DNA in the vaccine is different from RNA and can be permanent. They suggest that safer alternatives like hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin exist and question the transparency of the FDA. They urge states to protect their citizens and reconsider the use of the vaccine, especially for pregnant women and children.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I have a degree in biochemistry and molecular biology and I'm a toxicologist and an expert witness as a profession nationally and internationally, there's a difference between using this technology for cancer or for fixing inborn errors in metabolism as compared to using it in a vaccine. There you understand the risk. Here the risks were not told to people. Speaker 1: The Pfizer vaccine is contaminated with plasma DNA. It's not just mRNA. It's got bits of DNA in it. My philosophical bent here is I'm sure many of you've heard of Occam's razor. Right? Choose the simplest of explanations. Well, there's another one called Hanlon's razor, which is never attribute malice to that which can be better explained by incompetence. And so I'm trying to be gracious here in many circumstances there could be malice underneath but I'm trying to see just incompetence to be gracious. Speaker 0: With this DNA being present, what Philip did not touch on is that there are sequences within these plasmids. I personally feel that this is an intentional I believe that there is nefarious intent and I'm going to tell you why and it's something that he didn't touch on. Excuse me, there are there are s v forty sequences within the plasmids meds that were not disclosed to the regulators. The SV40 sequences, if you'll recall the SV40 virus was a contaminant of the polio vaccines. It is thought that that contamination of the virus, which is on oncogenic caused many of the cancers for the next several decades from the people, in the people that receive these vaccines. Now the whole the whole SV40 virus is not in the shots, but what is in the shots is a special sequence it's called a nuclear localization sequence which is in the shot to take the plasma DNA directly to the nucleus of human cells. It is not needed to grow these in bacteria. You would not have to use this to grow it in bacteria for the purpose that they said it was for to make lots of copies. This sequence takes the DNA to the nucleus of human cells where it can then be integrated or where, as Philip said, it is most likely to be integrated. Speaker 1: This DNA can and likely will integrate into the genomic DNA of cells that got transfected with the vaccine mix. This is just the way it works. We do this in the lab all the time. We take pieces of DNA, we mix them up with a lipid complex like the Pfizer vaccine is in, we pour it onto cells and and a lot of it gets into the cells and a lot of it gets into the DNA of those cells and it becomes a permanent fixture of the cell. It's not just it's a temporary, a temporary thing. It is in that cell and all of its progeny from now on forevermore. Amen. Speaker 0: So all this about there's no DNA in the shots, they will not go to the nucleus, they will not integrate with your DNA is not true and they knew it from the beginning because to say knew the plasmids were there. Speaker 1: So that's why I'm kind of alarmed about this DNA being in the vaccine. It's it's it's different from RNA because it can be permanent. A little nerdy science here, the central dogma of molecular biology is that DNA gets it's transcribed into RNA, okay, and then RNA gets translated into protein. This is just how life runs. Why why does this matter? Well, DNA, for the purposes of this discussion, DNA is a long lived information storage device, okay? Okay. What you were born with, you're gonna die with and pass on to your kids. DNA lasts for hundreds of thousands of years, If you and get pass it on to your kids, right? So alterations to the DNA, they stick around. Speaker 0: There's also an s v 40 promoter only designed to be expressed in human cells not bacteria cells. Now Philip has checked something he didn't say which is good news for people Doctor. Buchholz, I keep saying Philip, which is good news for people is that most of the sequences were broken. Had they been intact and if there are any that are intact and this is something he should have said we have to check. They can infect the E. Coli in your gut, that's what they're designed to do to infect the to infect E. Coli, which means you can be a perpetual spike factory because they're self replicating and they would self replicate in the bacteria of your gut and then make spike over and over and over again. This is outrageous. I've never seen anything like this in my entire career. We have got to pull these shots and restrict them from our children. We cannot inject these into babies and children. Speaker 1: You had said earlier nefarious. You felt like this was more nefarious Doctor Berkehold, in what sense are you saying that? Speaker 0: The s v forty sequences, they should not be there. They don't need to be there to grow this into back to grow this in bacteria. I don't think it's an accident. They could have chosen another plasmid that did not have the s v forty sequences. If these sequences sit above an oncogene and and they're promiscuous, that means they are likely to to integrate in places more likely than other genetic inserts, thank you so much, then they can cause cancer. Sertional mutagenesis anyway causes cancer. And that's the risk. That's why gene therapies were not brought to market for so many years cause there was a risk of causing cancer from insertional mutagenesis. We never needed these vaccines. We had treatments that worked. One of our doctors here is going to tell you about that hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, I can tell you as a toxicologist, they are not toxic. They're they're some of the safest drugs you can use. There's no reason once the FDA found out about this contamination, okay, and we looked to see endotoxin levels. But they've got them all redacted. Why would you redact them if you were trying to be as parent, why would you hold the data for 75 years? All of the clinical data for 75 years from these if you were trying to be transparent, tell me why? There is something very unusual going on here that is being done differently than it's ever been done before. We don't give experimental products to pregnant women. We don't give experimental products to babies that have a death profile like this. It's not done. It's never been done before. Please protect act your citizens. Please, I am begging you to protect your citizens. We've got to get 1 state to stand up and do the right thing. Do whatever you can so that other states will follow.

@c_plushie - Coronavirus Plushie

Dr. Janci Lindsay's testimony . . .

@c_plushie - Coronavirus Plushie

SC Senate Hearing: Dr. Janci Lindsay From @JesslovesMJK's Substack . . . (I would link to her Substack, but I heard that tweets with links to Substack are being suppressed. So please find Dr. Jessica Rose's Substack and take a look) Janci’s testimony is very important. She is…

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker expresses concerns about the safety of COVID-19 vaccines, particularly regarding the presence of DNA and contamination in the shots. They argue that the vaccines have caused more deaths in a few months than all other vaccines combined in the past 30 years. The speaker also discusses the potential risks of gene therapy and the presence of SV40 sequences and antibiotic-resistant genes in the shots. They believe that the contamination and intentional inclusion of certain sequences raise concerns about the vaccines' safety. The speaker calls for the recall of the vaccines, especially for children, and questions the transparency of the FDA and CDC in handling the data. They suggest using alternative treatments like hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: FDA. I just sent them emails and said, hey, you wanna you should look in this. Okay. Okay. Thank you so much. Next is doctor, Jansy Lindsey. I hope you can, I Speaker 1: hope you spoken with many scientists about checking for this months months months ago? None of them would do it. I spoke at the US Senate in December of 2022 about the risk this being passed to our children because of if being reversed transcribed simply from the RNA before we knew that there was DNA in the shots. As soon as I found out there was DNA in the shots, I went all over every social media platform I could get to And started ringing the alarm bell. Exactly. Don't you don't have to play that. At this point I have little time so I'm gonna follow-up to adhesive. Well, just show the ones. The ones side. The ones their So I disagree with doctor Buckholson that I think that this is the most dangerous platform that has ever been released on mankind. That It's very easy to see in the various database where you have more deaths, in just a couple months after the rollout than you have in the past 30 years for all the other vaccines combined. You would have to shrink that and go up. So there we go. So, these are all the other vaccines for the past 30 years combined. And this is what happens sorry. And this is what happened during COVID to deaths from vaccines. Do you see? We're at over 35 1,000 deaths. Typically, you would get no more than 200 deaths in a year for all 30 vaccine or for All of the vaccines combined. This is the past 30 years of deaths from vaccines reported into the VAERS You've already heard earlier that this represents only 1 to 13% of the cases that are normally reported. This is a safety signal. This is a safety signal. This is the platform itself, okay? Okay. In the clinical trials, we saw deaths. We definitely had deaths. That was used in process That's 1 without the contamination. Okay. What may not have been clear is that the shots tested on the people in Clinical trials were vastly different than the shots tested or given to people released on the population. I'm short on time, so I'm trying to Listen. Basically, people were given in the clinical trial a clean shot. People, everybody else was given these contaminated shots. Every single file that's been tested by every scientist around the world is contaminated with these plasmids. And they're contest some are Contaminated when when Kevin McKernan first tested the vials, he found that, one of the vials contained up to about 30 Percent of the nucleic acid material was in fact DNA. So, this is not some residual contamination that's carrying over. This is Significant contamination. Why does that matter? Gene therapy was never brought to market even though it's been over 40 years in development because in the It caused latent cancers that developed 2 to 4 years after these were given because it caused lethal autoimmune Reactions even when you were producing human proteins, not viral proteins, not bacterial proteins, Material proteins that you are displaying on the surface of yourself. Think about the logic of this. In traditional gene therapies, and these are gene therapies, Yes, they would be classified as gene therapies. In traditional gene therapies, you send in a genetic message to make a missing protein. That protein is identical to the protein that should have been in your body, but you're missing. This time we're sending in a sequence and Asking it to make a piece of a viral protein and we're displaying it on ourselves and then our body is attacking it And killing those cells, it doesn't stay in your arm. They said it would stay in your arm. It goes to every single cell in your body, every tissue in Your body it goes to your brain, it goes to your bone marrow, where then your body is able to attack these cells. It is not a healthy platform for this. There's a difference between using this technology for cancer Or for fixing inborn errors in metabolism as compared to using it in a vaccine. There you Understand the risk. Here the risks were not told to people. With this DNA being present, what Philip did not touch on is that there are Sequences within these plasmids, I personally feel that this is an intentional, I believe that there is nefarious I'm going to tell you why and it's something that he didn't touch on. There are s v forty sequences Excuse me. There are there are s v 40 sequences within the plasmids that were not disclosed to the regulators. The s v forty Sequences, if you recall, the SV 40 virus was a contaminant of the polio vaccines. It is thought that that Contamination of the virus, which is on oncogenic, caused many of the cancers for the next several decades from the people in the people that receive these vaccines. Now the whole poll the whole s v 40 virus is not in the shots. But what is in the shots It's a special sequence. It's called a nuclear localization sequence, which is in the shot to Take the plasma DNA directly to the nucleus of human cells. It is not needed to grow these in bacteria. You would not have To use this to grow it in bacteria for the purpose that they said it was for, to make lots of copies. This sequence Takes the DNA to the nucleus of human cells where it can then be integrated Aware, as Philip said, it is most likely to be integrated. So all this about there's no DNA in the shots, they will not go to the nucleus, they will not Integrate with your DNA is not true and they knew it from the beginning because they knew the plasmids were there. That's a problem. There's also an s v Forty promoter only designed to be expressed in human cells, not bacteria cells. Now, Philip has checked And something you didn't say, which is good news, for people. Doctor. Buchholz, I keep saying Philip, which is good news for people is That most of the sequences were broken. Had they been intact and if there are any that are intact, and this is something he should have said, we have to check. They can infect the E coli in your gut. That's what they're designed to do, to infect the e to to infect E coli, which means you can be a perpetual spike Because they're self replicating and they would self replicate in the bacteria of your gut and then make spike over and over and over again. That's a problem. They also carry an antibiotic resistant gene cassette to kanamycin and Chantamycin. Cantamycin is the main antibiotic used to treat tuberculosis. Neomycin is another antibiotic that's widely used. People that receive these, if it transfects the E. Coli in your gut, it can make that your gut, and Other bacteria, not just that, it can make them resistant to those antibiotics. That is a huge huge risk. And it's something that's known for plasmids. It's something that they've, they're careful to make sure that you don't have these antibiotic resistance genes if If they're making something that should go into gene therapy and now it's here, now it's present. I've worked for several months to try to get these shots recalled. Completely recalled. They're dangerous. Excuse me. I need to get a drink of water, but, they're dangerous. We're Objecting these in our kids. We don't inject contaminated medical products in our kids. Something Doctor. Buchholz didn't touch on as well is if there's that much plasma In the shots, there's a very good chance that there's bacterial endotoxin in the shots. Which means bacterial proteins which can cause anaphylaxis and even death. And that That may be what caused some of the the rapid deaths that occurred right after people got these shots. There's so much more to touch on. We've seen massive Massive cases of miscarriage and stillbirth. Normally, during years we wouldn't see more than 25 cases of miscarriage Or stillbirth for all the vaccines combined. In 2021, we saw three 1428 cases of stillbirth and miscarriage reported into the VAERS system. Remember, no more than 25 typically in a year is normal for all the vaccines combined, 3,428 in 2/22, we saw 1520 Stillbirth and miscarriage. And in halfway through that year, the FDA or the CDC said they They would stop reporting on, they would stop making all their information public because they did not want to encourage vaccine hesitancy or misinformation or misinterpret misinterpretation of the data. So all of a sudden we saw what was what was going like this go like this in February. That's artificial. We can't even trust the data coming of the the CDC anymore. The FDA the FDA knows about this contamination. They're not doing anything. I'm sorry this is so rushed. I just wanted to address what Doctor. Buchholz was not able to. He and I have the Same degrees. I have a degree in biochemistry and molecular biology, and I'm a toxicologist and an Expert witness as a profession nationally and internationally. This is outrageous. I've never seen anything like this In my entire career, we have got to pull these shots and restrict them from our children. We cannot inject these into babies These and children these are contaminated dangerous lethal products. I don't Agree with Doctor. Buchholz, but I believe that he's just seeing a lot of this Donna. I feel like he is where we were 3 years ago. So No. That's basically if I don't leave now, I won't catch my plane. May not catch it anyway. So Speaker 0: You had said earlier, nefarious. You felt like this was more nefarious than doctor Burkholder. In What sense are you saying that? Speaker 1: The s v forty sequences, they should not be there. They don't need to be Dare to grow this into back to grow this in bacteria. I don't think it's an accident. They could have chosen another plasmid that did not have the SB 40 sequences. If these sequences sit above an oncogene and and they're promiscuous, that means they are likely to To integrate in places more likely than other genetic inserts thank you so much Then they can cause cancer. Insertional mutagenesis anyway causes cancer. And that's the risk. That's why gene Therapies were not brought to market for so many years because there was a risk of causing cancer from insertional mutagenesis. We never needed these Vaccines. We had treatments that worked. One of our doctors here is gonna tell you about that hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin, I can tell you, as a toxicologist, they are not toxic. They're they're some of the safest drugs you can use. I There's no reason once the FDA found out about this contamination. Okay, and we looked to see endotoxin levels, but they've Got them all redacted. Why would you redact them if you were trying to be transparent? Why would you hold the data for 75 years? All All of the clinical data for 75 years from these if you were trying to be transparent, tell me why. There is something very unusual going on here that is being done differently than it's ever been done before. We don't give Speaker 0: experimental products to Speaker 1: pregnant women. We don't give experimental products products to pregnant women. We don't give experimental products to babies that have a death profile like this. It's not done. It's never been done before. Please protect your citizens. Please. I am begging you to protect your citizens. We've got to get 1 state to stand up and do the right thing. Do whatever Or you can so that other states will follow. I'm sorry. Speaker 0: Thank you, doctor, Lindsey. Any questions? Speaker 1: Again, sorry. I was a little urgent in that. I re scheduled my Uber twice. So Speaker 0: So It's just very difficult to keep this, everything on schedule with him, but thank you for staying So much. Thank you for staying, and thank you for presenting, and we appreciate it so much. Yeah. Speaker 1: If you have any questions, please feel free to Speaker 0: We will be reaching out, I promise. Gene, who's next? Speaker 2: Mr. Chairman, we passed over to meet, To meet time obligations, we passed over, mister Rick Nagel, so it's probably time to call him up now. Speaker 0: Andrew Rick Nagle. Is it Nagle? Yeah. Speaker 2: Nagle. Beg your pardon, sir.

@c_plushie - Coronavirus Plushie

Dr. Phillip Buckhault's testimony . . .

@c_plushie - Coronavirus Plushie

DNA in the #Covid Shots: South Carolina Senate Hearing: USC Professor Dr. Phillip Buckhaults From @JesslovesMJK's Substack (I would link to her Substack, but I heard that tweets with links to Substack are being suppressed. So please find Dr. Jessica Rose's Substack and take a…

Video Transcript AI Summary
Dr. Philip Buchholz, a biochemist and cancer gene researcher, discusses concerns about the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine in terms of regulatory oversight and potential risks. He explains that the vaccine contains DNA in addition to mRNA, which could lead to genome modification and autoimmune responses. Dr. Buchholz suggests that the DNA in the vaccine could be responsible for rare but serious side effects and calls for further investigation into its integration into the human genome. He emphasizes the need for improved regulatory processes and urges the FDA to remove the DNA from future versions of the vaccine. Dr. Buchholz also highlights the importance of informed consent and the role of state agencies in ensuring vaccine safety.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So a a little bit of what am I doing here? For those of you don't don't don't know me, me, my name is Philip Buchholz. I'm a, I have a PhD in biochemistry and molecular biology. I'm a cancer gene jock. Basically, I do it's Genomics Research at the University of South Carolina. And what that means is that I'm kind of an expert on all the ways is that the human genome can get fudged with during your lifetime and which of those things cause cancer and which ones don't. Okay? So technically, that means is that I'm very, very skilled in in the art of DNA sequencing. Okay. I can figure out the sequence of things that I didn't know what I was looking for. And I'm also pretty good, when I say I I mean the people in my laboratory. You're not gonna hear their names, but there's a group of people that do this excellent work. Detecting foreign pieces of DNA in places where they're not supposed to be, even if they're real low levels. And we used those skills during the pandemic, to we invented the COVID test that many of you did a spit test, okay, okay, that came out of my lab because we were really good at that kind of stuff. And so, I've earned a fair amount of respect, in the state of South Carolina and in this body because we did a ton of COVID testing in the middle of the night when people were afraid, and we told them, know you don't have COVID in your home or yes, you do. So my qualifications to comment on this are both technical and I'm kind of relational in the state of South Carolina. I'll cut to a very narrow theme here, but it does touch on lots of these regulatory issues, and I'll leave it to you to expand on those if you want to. I'll try to stay in this narrow lane, of some problems in the Pfizer vaccine, as a case study for places in which regulatory oversight could be improved, all right? So first of all, let me say that my interpretation of the literature is that the Pfizer vaccine did a pretty good job of keeping people from dying, but it did a terrible job of stopping the pandemic. The early publications showed that, it stopped infection, but that only lasted for, like, a month. Speaker 1: Doctor Brookhark, could Could you pull the mic a little closer to you? Staff's telling me they're having trouble getting you on the recording. Speaker 2: Okay. Speaker 1: Okay, thank you. Speaker 0: In in my professional the evaluation of the literature, the Pfizer vaccine did a pretty good job at keeping people out of the cemetery, but it sucked at stopping the pandemic. And, it was the best of sucky options that we had. And I still believe that, it was deployed mostly in good faith, but there were a lot of shortcuts taken because the house was on fire, and we could do a better job next time from the lessons that we're gonna learn here. That's my own personal view of this, but I'm also topical dent here is, I'm sure many of you've heard of Occam Occam's razor, right? Choose the simplest of explanations. Well, there's another one a hand lawns razor, which is never attribute malice to that which can be better explained by incompetence. And so I'm trying to be gracious here in many circumstances. There could be malice underneath but I'm trying to see just incompetence to be gracious. So the Pfizer is my DNA. It's not just mRNA, it's got bits of DNA in it. This DNA is the DNA vector it was used, as the template for the in vitro transcription reaction when they made the mRNA. I know this is true because I sequenced it in my own lab. The vials of Pfizer vaccine that were given out here in Columbia, one of my colleagues was in charge of that vaccination program in the College of Pharmacy, and for reasons that I still don't understand, he kept every single vial. So he had a whole freezer full of the empty vials. Well, the empty vials have a little tiny bit in the bottom of them. He gave them all to me and I looked at them. We had 2 batches which is that we're given out here in Columbia, and I checked these 2 batches and I checked them by sequencing. And I sequenced all the DNA that was in the vaccine, and I can see what's in there. And it's surprising that there's any DNA in there, and you can kinda work out what it is listen how it got there, and I'm kind of alarmed about the possible consequences of this, both in terms of human health and biology, but but you should be alarmed about the regulatory process that allowed it to get there. So this DNA in my view, it could be causing some of the rare but serious side effects like death from cardiac arrest. So there's a lot of cases now, of people having suspicious death after vaccine. It's hard to prove what caused it. It's just, you know, temporally associated, and this DNA is a plausible mechanism, okay? This DNA can and likely will integrate into the genomic DNA a of cells that got transfected with the vaccine mix. This is just the way it works. We do this in the lab all the time. We take pieces of DNA, we mix them up with a a lipid Complex like the Pfizer vaccine is in, we pour it onto cells and and a lot of it gets into the cells, and a lot of it gets into the DNA of those cells, and it becomes a permanent mixture of the cell. It's not just a temporary thing. It is in that cell and all of its progeny from now on forevermore, amen. So that's why I'm kind of alarmed about this DNA being in the vaccine. It's it's different from RNA because it can be permanent. This is a real hazard for genome modification of long lived somatic cells like stem themselves, and it could cause theoretically, this is all a theoretical concern, but it's pretty reasonable based on solid molecular biology, that that it could cause a sustained autoimmune attack toward that tissue. It's also a very real theoretical risk of future cancer in some people depending on where in the genome this foreign piece of DNA lands, it can interrupt a tumor suppressor or activate an oncogene. I I think it'll be rare, but I think the risk is not zero and it may be high enough that we are to figure out if this is happening or not. And then again, the the the autoimmunity thing is not my wheelhouse. I'm not an immunologist, but the cancer risk is. That's my bag. I know this is a thing, and it is a possibility. Okay. A little nerdy science here. The central dogma the dogma of molecular biology is that DNA gets transcribed into RNA, okay? And then RNA gets translated put it into protein. This is just how life runs. Why why does this matter? Well, DNA, for the purposes of this discussion, DNA is a long lived information storage device. Okay. What you were born with, you're gonna die with and pass on to your kids. DNA lasts for 100 of 1000 of years, and it can last for generations if you pass it on to your kids, right? So alterations additions to the DNA, they stick around. RNA by its nature is temporary, it doesn't last, and that feature of RNA was part of the sales pitch for the vaccine. The pseudo uridine was supposed to make the RNA last a little bit longer, but still it's a transient and phenomenon, we're talking hours to days, okay. And then proteins, once proteins are made they so don't last forever. They they last for hours to days. But something that makes its way into DNA has the potential to last for a very long time, maybe a lifetime. So this is a picture of the sequencing read that, the sequencing run that I did, in in the lab, from a couple of batches of the Pfizer vaccine, and all those little bitty lines here are the little tiny pieces of DNA that are in the vaccine. They don't belong there. They're not part of the sales pitch or the marketing campaign, and they're there. There's a lot of them. This little graph here in the middle is the size distribution that peaks it's around a 100 base pairs, a 120 base pairs. So the DNA pieces that are in the vaccine are are short little pieces, 100, 120. There's some that are about 500 base pairs, a few that are even 5,000, but most of them are around 100 base why is this important? Because the probability of a DNA, piece of DNA integrating into the human genome is unrelated to its size. So your genome risk is just a function of how many particles there are. So it's like, you know, if you shoot a shotgun at a washboard, if you shoot a slug, you have some probability of hitting it. And if you shoot buckshot, you have a bigger probability of hitting it with some shot, right? This all these little pieces of DNA that are in the vaccine are analogous to buckshot. You have many many thousands of opportunities to modify, a, cell of a vaccinated so the pieces are very small because during the process they chopped them up to try to make them go away, but they actually increased the hazard of genome modification in the process. That's how this got here. In my view, somebody should go about sequencing DNA samples from stem cells of people who are vaccinated David, and find out if this theoretical risk has happened or not. I think this is a real serious oversight, regulatory oversight, or oversight that happened at the federal level, and somebody should force this to happen somewhere. Speaker 1: Doctor Bercow, if you now, are you capable of doing that? Speaker 0: Yeah. It's we do that kind of thing. But in order for it to be trustworthy, it by the public, this has has to be done by lots of people. Right. Speaker 1: I'll talk to you more about that later. Speaker 0: Yeah. This is our our deal. This is why I know this should have been done at the federal Okay. So we took all these pieces of DNA and we used them to glue together what the source DNA must have been. This is kind of, again, this is what we do in the lab all the time. And all these little grid and green lines here, these are all independent little pieces of DNA. This must have had a 100,000 pieces of DNA in this this, sequencing run. And you can put them all back together and see what they came from is this circle over here. It's a plasmid that you can go shopping online to buy from Agilent, and it's clear that Pfizer took this plasmid and then they cloned Spike into it, and they used it that for in a process called in vitro transcription translation, in vitro transcription, where you feed, an RNA polymerase this it's Plasmid, and it makes a whole bunch of mRNA copies for you. Okay. And then you take this mRNA, you mix it with the lipid nano the whole transfection reagent and now you've got your mRNA vaccine, but they failed to get the DNA out before they did this. So these little pieces is they did they did make some effort to chop it up, so all these little pieces of the plasma got packaged in with the RNA. That's clear as day what happened just the forensics of looking at the DNA sequencing, okay? A little bit of a regulatory note here. The way you do RNA transcription in vitro transcription reactions you have to give it a DNA template, okay, okay, and you can give it a DNA template that is just a synthetic piece of DNA that is only the instructions to make the RNA, and that's what was done for getting the, emergency use authorization and the clinical trial. That's called process 1 if you look up that kind of stuff. They made a PCR product of just the bits that they wanted, and then they did the in vitro transcription, made a bunch of RNA of that. There was no plasma DNA to contaminate the stuff that was used for the trial, but that that making that PCR product doesn't scale all the way that was necessary to vaccinate the whole world. So a cheaper way to scale up the production of this template is to clone that PCR product into this plasmid vector, put the plasmid vector into bacteria and then grow up big vats of the bacteria, they make a lot of the plasma DNA for you, then use that plasma DNA as the template to drive this transcription reaction to make your RNA. And that's where how the contamination ended up in the production batches even though it was not in the stuff that was used for the authorization trials. So I know it's a little bit of nerdy science, but it has regulatory implications for for you guys. We can we can measure the quantity of this stuff pretty easy in the lab. This is we're we're good at doing this kind of stuff. This is the same, we made a little PC. A colleague of mine at at MIT made, you know, from who who used to work for the the Broad Institute at MIT, he he made a little, PCR test and we cloned it here. This is similar to the PCR test that you all took for the spit test, okay, same same idea and same expertise behind it. And we can quantify exactly how much of this stuff is in a vaccine or any other tissue. And you know, I estimate that there were about 2,000,000,000 copies of the 1 piece that we're looking for in every dose. And if you look back at that map I showed you where it's all these little the little piece that we're looking for is just that little bit right there, okay? But if you see 2,000,000,000 copies of this, there's about 200,000,000,000 of everything else. So what this means is that there's probably about 200,000,000,000 pieces of this plasma DNA in in each dose of the vaccine, and it's encapsulated in this lipid nanoparticle, so it's ready to be delivered inside the cell. Okay. This is a bad idea. My conclusions from this, we should check a people. My conclusions from this or I should learn how to run PowerPoint. We should check check a bunch of vaccinated people getting tissue samples, especially if we focus on harmed people, but that's not necessary. We could also just focus on regular unharmed people and see if this plasmid DNA is integrating into the genomes of any of their stem cells. It leaves a calling card that is there. One of the reasons why I'm focusing on this is because it's kinda different from a lot of the other imagined harms where you can't really prove it. You can be suspicious because of the timing, but you can't really prove it. This one you can prove it because it leaves a calling card. Okay. You find it in the stem cells of harmed people. It's equivalent to finding a certain type of lid in someone who is now dead. It's pretty reasonable to assume that that's it's what caused it. The royal we, meaning you guys, should insist that the FDA force Pfizer to get the DNA out of the booster and all future versions of this vaccine. I'm a real fan of this platform, okay? I think it has the potential to treat cancers. I really believe that this this platform is revolutionary, and in your lifetime, there will be mRNA vaccines against antigens in your unique cancer, okay, and but they gotta get this problem fixed, okay. And I and I right now, I think the financial incidents too great to just keep on rolling with it, and it's gonna take some encouragement to get it out. The regulation that allowed this DNA to be there in the 1st place. I don't think that this the amounts there actually exceed the regulation limits. In some batches it may. In in the 2 batches that I looked at, one of them it was just under the limit and one it was just over the limit. My colleague in Boston has looked at a fair number of other batches, and there's a handful that are super high and there's a handful that are super low. But the fact that there is a regulatory threshold for amount of DNA allowed in a vaccine is a throwback to an era when we were talking about vaccines scenes are like a recombinant protein that you or a dead virus, you know, attenuated virus produced in in CHO cells or something like And the DNA that might be in it is naked DNA, and you might have a little doubt in the vaccine. That's not a problem because naked DNA gets chewed up immediately upon vaccination and there's no real mechanism for it to get inside cells, they inappropriately applied that regulatory limit to this new kind of vaccine where everything is encapsulated in a lipid nanoparticle. It's basically packaged in a synthetic virus able to dump its contents into a cell. So I'm thinking Hanlon's razor here, okay? I don't think there was anything nefarious here, I think it was just kind of a dumb oversight. And it's gonna take because the financial incentives are so great to just, you know, sweep it under the rug. And the career incentives of people that approve this are gonna be, there's nothing wrong here. You know, it's gonna take some encouragement to make people prove that it's okay. But I really believe this was an appropriate application of an old school regulation to a new kind of vaccine. And who knows, maybe we'll check a bunch of people and we'll find out for sure that this this is indeed not a problem, and that will do the public good if we prove that. Mister chairman. Speaker 1: Senator Cash. Speaker 2: Doctor, we, appreciate all that you're saying, Although we don't understand most of what you're saying. Sorry. Speaker 0: I have a limited amount Speaker 2: of time Here's someone down there agreeing a lot, so you must Must have been a chemistry major or something. But, what what is gonna help us is to know what what you can do, Like checking a bunch of vaccinated people. Speaker 0: Of course, that's what I can do. Right. But Speaker 2: we are not gonna have any authority over FDA to force Pfizer to do something. I mean, that's a federal issue, unless you You can explain to me how we could do something at a state level. You know, some of this is gonna have to be taken up by our congressman. Right? So just Whatever your remaining comments are, just keep in mind Speaker 0: that I understand. Speaker 2: What what we can do and and really these Technical things you're throwing out us is is the senator from Greenville has already mentioned. We're gonna throw right back at you because there's no you're the expert. So So if someone's gonna do this testing, I don't know who would find to do it other than someone like you. Speaker 0: I can do it. Lots of other people can do it. I've had a lot of of, corners and pharmacists from different states contact me. I posted all this on Twitter, right? And so people will private message me and say, I'd like to send you some samples. And then they say, oops, state led regulations will not allow our coroner to send any samples it's for this. So there are some policy issues that can allow this to happen or impede it. I don't know what they are, but I hear here that there are mechanisms in place that will, you know, you can encourage people to do things or not new things, but that's your wheelhouse, not mine. All I can tell you is what I found in the lab and the scientific shuns of it, the policy implications and what to do it, it is out of my above it's above my pay grade. Speaker 1: Mister chairman, Garrett. Speaker 3: Thank you for coming today. I think I Followed most of what you said. President Biden said the other day that there was a new COVID vaccine that and this one really works. Speaker 0: There's no evidence to that as far Speaker 3: as I'm concerned. I understand that, and that's why I'm asking this question. Is there some way you could get a hold of one of I would Speaker 0: love to. Speaker 3: Do the same study that you did on these vials to make sure that we're not using that that DNA protein And whatever it is, the DNA that that that we don't need in to be injected into these, to our constituents. Speaker 0: I would like to do that, and I will not get it unless I get a batch and to and find out that it's free of DNA, and then I'll take it myself. I mean But I don't I don't have any way of compelling that to Ethan. Speaker 3: So it was just basically a way to save money by doing it in such volume that way without then taking it back out Later on. Speaker 0: I think nobody thought about it. I think it was reasonable to use the E. Coli to blow pull up the plasma to make the stuff, and then the the pieces of the DNA are of a very uniform and small size. That's evidence that they took efforts to try to chop it up. And Speaker 3: Then they knew about it. Speaker 2: Yeah. Speaker 0: Yeah. They knew it. And they took efforts to chop it up, they just didn't get it Out. Speaker 3: But but but having said that. Speaker 0: I guess that they just didn't think about the the hazard for genome modification because it's not not all that expensive to add another process to get it out. Speaker 3: Well, that's what I'm saying. It it you know? Speaker 0: I can't get inside my mind. Speaker 3: I don't rush too much. And that's what I'm saying. These subsequent, you know, we've heard testimony of these subsequent, you know, variant, subsequent boosters, etcetera, etcetera, are leading To maybe not scientific yet, but at least collateral knowledge that it apparently these things are causing death and disability later on, and also the aging process, which you heard about. Speaker 0: There's a lot of suspicious associations. But I but it seems That's all Speaker 3: that before we can in South Carolina, you know, give this new vaccine a whirl around Here, seems to me that that our people ought to be able to look at that, mister chairman, and see whether or not it's got this DNA. And if it It's fine. Tell everybody that's got the DNA and the and the problems associated therewith, then you got informed Speaker 0: consent. Correct. Speaker 3: Okay. But without that, we Speaker 0: will handle it. Informed consent. Speaker 3: I'm not I'm not really happy about that, mister chairman, and do what I can to try to help. Speaker 0: Knowing what I know saying otherwise. Knowing what I know now about about this, I would still have recommended it to my elderly parents, but I probably would not have given it to my daughters. I feel like my consent was not as informed as it should have been. Speaker 3: Thank you. Speaker 1: Yeah. Representative Morgan. Speaker 4: I almost don't know Where to start? I'm I'm trying not to talk because we're it's a hearing and we want to hear you, but I you have made so many questions come to my mind. And one I should know but I don't Remember what percentage of vaccinated people had this kind of vaccination? Do you know off the top of your head? Like the majority of people that took the vaccine have this Because weren't there multiple types of vaccinations you could take? Speaker 0: The vast majority of people got either Pfizer or Moderna. And and we're talking about the Pfizer? I'm talking about Pfizer. My colleagues leagues have looked at Moderna, and it's in Moderna too in the few that we've looked at. It's just not quite as high. Speaker 4: Okay. Wow. Wait, so you were here today, and you've come to present, and you noticed this. Where could you have gone if we didn't have this kind of ad hoc Fuck hearing. Twitter. So there's no there's no way for you, even at your level of expertise, Is to say, hey, red flag Speaker 0: I I emailed I emailed the FDA and I tweeted at them. That's about the extent of my resources. Speaker 4: It's fascinating to me that in us in the state that we don't have some kind of, I guess it goes to kind The entire thing that we're talking about is that our state agency should have more focus on our citizens health, and you know it's great CDC You can send us stuff but we'll make the decision, and and there should be a way for, especially at your level, to get input to DHEC when You notice something like this immediately and say, hey DHEC, you should consider this. And then they can come and tell us immediately, hey, we need to get authorization. You need to change this regulation to look into this, and it just seems like we've totally dropped the ball in every direction with the state prioritizing, you know, Our decision making on this kind of stuff and and investigating into it. Just letting the, you know, the federal government take it and do a terrible job. Speaker 0: So I had a lot of experience with DHEC rolling out the saliva test. Okay, so we invented the saliva test, and then we had to deal with DHEC who tried to get it rolled out for the state. And it appeared to me that they were just overrun. They weren't prepared for what this pandemic was. And it's no fault of theirs. I thought I I told people at the time that I felt like these were Hobbits in the Shire that were, you know, you know, accustomed to taking care of small problems, and all of a sudden we're in the War of the Ring, and there are orcs at the gate, and we're expecting them to deal with this tremendous challenge. And that's not who we put there, and that's not their fault. I mean, it's just we were not prepared to handle something of this magnitude. So some amount of grace, I think, is appropriate even though we could do better next time by beefing up who's guarding the gates. Speaker 4: If you if you had, tomorrow, fixes To the system, what would they be? Speaker 0: That we could that's your job man out of law. Speaker 4: I mean, since you lived it in and saw based on the research, should we Have somebody actually checking up especially on something that is being pushed statewide. I mean, state resources are being used saying to take this vaccine. Speaker 0: You have to hire people that are qualified I have to tell the feds no. And that's not what we do here usually in South Carolina. We hire people. Sometimes times we say to the no to the Feds just to be ornery because that's our culture in South Carolina, but many times we say, well I don't know, what do other people do? And we hire people all over that they ask, well, what does Clemson do? What does USC? What do they do over in this other state? Instead of putting people in place that we would have confidence in saying no to the to whatever the recommendations were. We put people in that. We often encourage them to not make too many waves and just go ask the feds what they're doing. And that's not their fault, that's the culture that we cultivated. So I So I know that South Carolina culture is no. No. No. We're gonna do our own thing. But in reality, in terms of actually doing stuff, almost always, we people will say, well, what do they do else in another state? Or what are they doing at the Fed level? And I'll just go along with it. Speaker 4: Would it be, And I'm not a medical professional by any stretch. Would it be realistic for anything that is being promoted, especially on a large scale of Vaccinations, you know, coming from who knows where to have it be investigated by people in our state such as yourself, or Is that would that be Speaker 0: to It was reasonable to trust the FDA even though I have my doubts about their independence now. Everybody just trusted the feds to do this. And at the time, that was kinda reasonable. Speaker 4: But going forward, I get that's my question. Going forward, Is it possible, is it reasonable for us to be able to have a system where we could, especially if it's been if the taxpayer money is gonna be used to push it and tell people That we have it set up that it's automatically tested basically or looked into by scientists and medical professionals in our state to determine, Maybe it's in DHEC. Maybe DHEC has that, where they are required to look into it and have their own, you know, summary or Decision on whether or not it's safe and effective since we know that CDC and, FDA and all these are not doing a good job with it. And I and I guess I'm asking you as a professional, are Speaker 2: you do you hear that Speaker 4: and think, wow, that's gonna It costs an insane amount of money, and good luck. Right? Like, no. That's reasonable. Speaker 0: No. No. The the actual, like, scientific experiments are I don't think an insane amount of money. It's having the the regulatory and and financial independence to like say, no, we're not going to do it the way we're told until we find out that it's okay. When in reality, much of our support comes from federal sources. It's like if you have a better idea for how to build the interstate, you kinda have to do what the the federal people tell you regardless, right, we because that's where the money comes from for a lot of the in interstate big infrastructure. And I think I'm not a policy expert, but I I think that a lot of financial support through the health care Stum and and elsewhere was tied to compliance to the federal narratives. And so I don't know that you can create true independence. You you could maybe create some kind of oversight that would enhance public trust in whether it was a good idea or not. But that's a different matter from us being able to go our own way all the time. But that's your that's your leader. That's your area of expertise, not mine. Speaker 4: Yeah. But it is but it is possible to have somebody look into vaccinations and do Nations and do similarly to what you did on Speaker 0: This this I did this on my own money with free student. I mean, yeah. We this is not terribly expensive to do these kinds of tests. Right. But, you know, there has to be in a system that that professors are not gonna be penalized for producing results that are counter to what the party line is supposed to be. And that you can create bubbles of where the protection for people whose job it is to check things. And if they come up with answers that nobody likes, they can still say them. And and you have to create these kind of protection bubbles. Speaker 3: Well, mister chairman. Speaker 1: Yes. I'm gonna Speaker 0: ask him just Speaker 3: a few more questions. Speaker 2: Doctor, have you are you planning to publish these findings? Have you tried to publish these findings in a journal? Speaker 0: No and no. They're not. As of now, they are interesting thing and concerning, but not they don't rise to the level of a peer reviewed publication. The most technically, the best possible outcome would be that I would check a bunch of people, find out it never integrated, and this is not a problem, and then it will never be published because papers don't publish negative results. Kind of the worst outcome is, I can check a bunch to people and I find, oh, it integrated and it's causing these horrible things, and yeah, then I'll get a paper and be famous. But I'm hoping that that's not the way it goes. So So you see how they're in academia for publication, there are all these perverse incentives in place, where the kind of thing you need to be done is is the kind of thing that does not generate a publication. You need a regulatory body to check, find no problem, and tell the public, there's no problem we checked, and there ain't nothing there that will never get published, you know, or very seldom. It's hard to publish negative results like that. And that's why academic science is not the best place to do it. Speaker 2: How long would it take to do what it is you're talking about here, about check a bunch The vaccinated people, I mean, it's it's hard for me listening to all this for the first time to to How alarmed you are and whether in your personal opinion you would hit the pause button on allowing this new vaccine, so To speak, without knowing more. How long does it take and and how serious is it to to find find out this information before people keep taking these vaccines. Speaker 0: It takes about 3 hours to check a vial of vaccine to see if it's got this in it. About $100 of agents. And I'm not gonna get it unless I find a vial that I can check ahead of and make sure it's not there. And if it is there, I'll take a pass on it. Speaker 2: Thank you. Speaker 1: Doc doctor Boethalff, thank you so much for being here. And I would like to say that, I was sort of in the world One of COVID that we've been dealing with with all the lies and cover ups and misinformation out there, I would Almost call you a whistleblower. And doctor Lee, I think we may have found our state surgeon general you're Speaker 0: gonna know. It's not my thank thank you for your confidence in me with us. Speaker 1: What I would like to say is as we wrap it up is I do appreciate you, I understand, where you are employed. And, you and I have had a little conversation about how wonderful tenure is and things Like that. But if you experience any retribution or any harassment for coming forward at this hearing and Stephane, would you please let us know? Because I can assure you, you will have an army behind you to help with whatever You may Speaker 0: come your way. Thank you very much. Speaker 1: Rhett Morgan has 1 more question. Crazy. And we've gotta move on. Doctor Actually, is, I think under time constraints Speaker 0: I should Speaker 4: have asked this. So you didn't, have you haven't interacted with DHEC about this specific? No. Okay. Speaker 2: I was Speaker 0: I was just wondering if you had any. I interacted with some, a couple of people at the FDA. I just sent them emails Wilson said, hey, you wanna you should look in this. Speaker 1: Okay. Okay. Thank you so much. Next is doctor, Jansy Lindsey.

@c_plushie - Coronavirus Plushie

@c_plushie - Coronavirus Plushie

#Pfizer shot contaminated with simian virus 40 proteins and DNA that could get into the nucleus of your cells and alter your DNA. Dr @NassMeryl talking with @RobertKennedyJr @P_McCulloughMD @DrJBhattacharya @JesslovesMJK @winstonpeters @HopeRising19 @DrAseemMalhotra 🔊

Video Transcript AI Summary
The presence of DNA plasmids and undisclosed proteins in the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine has raised concerns. The DNA plasmids, originating from E. Coli, were not properly removed during manufacturing, resulting in contamination. Additionally, two proteins from the simian virus 40 (SV40) were found in the vaccine, which is associated with certain cancers. SV40 was present in polio vaccines administered to millions of Americans in the past. Injecting these proteins and DNA into the body can potentially lead to mutations and increased risk of cancer. This discovery suggests a higher chance of mutation from the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And a recent other issue arose which might explain why so many people are sick after these shots. And that is the presence of DNA plasmids, which initially were thought to be in the vaccine because of a Cheap manufacturing process that didn't get rid of them. So the DNA plasmids from E. Coli are used to manufacture to the RNA in the vaccines. And the vaccines appear to be contaminated with at least 10 times more than should be residual in the vaccine. But then it also turned out that there are 2 proteins in the vaccine that were not disclosed on the on any labels, at least in the Pfizer vaccine, that come from the s v 40 virus, simian virus 40, which is associated in some studies with several cancers. And, you know, came from it it contaminated polio vaccines. So a 100,000,000 Americans apparently got SV 40 from polio vaccines, myself being 1. You probably did also. Speaker 1: I did too. Speaker 0: So anyway, Speaker 1: SV 40, meaning simian virus 40, it's a virus that came out of the monkeys. It was a virus that was in the Trademark of monkey of monkey flesh and kidneys that they use to cultivate the vaccine. So they were cultivating the polio vaccines On a substrate on petri dishes that were made up of masticated monkey kidneys from green monkeys, And they started finding, this is before they knew how to find viruses, and they started finding viruses that were indigenous to monkeys. And people were worried, well, what will happen when you inject these into people? Because, you know, they've never been exposed. And the SV 40 was the 40th one they found. And what they found is that it's very, very carcinogenic. So if you inject it into guinea pigs or gerbils, They sprout tumors. And in fact, it's used in laboratories to develop tumors so that scientists can, you know, do To work on tumor reduction. But our generation, the the 98,000,000 people who American And kids, you know, in the 5th, the late fifties and early sixties who got this. In fact, it was a very famous researcher at NIH named Bernice Eddy Who discovered this virus in the polio vaccine. And she warned NIH, you're, you know, this is a very dangerous Iris that you're gonna give to 90,000,000, a 100000000000 people. And they, she was their most famous scientist at the time. And they removed her telephone. They changed the locks on her lab. They locked her out of her lab, and they put her in a basement, and they ordered her not to talk to anybody. And then she released the study defiantly, and that's how we know about it. But our generation that got it has 10 times the soft tissue cancer of, you know, our parents' generation. And in many of these tumors, they have found SV 40 virus. Oh, you know, it was very worrying. And now, you know, they're finding it in the COVID vaccines. Speaker 0: Right. Not the whole virus, but 2 proteins. But they're important proteins. These are proteins that in conjunction with the DNA, double stranded DNA that is in the Plasmids work to allow that D NAA to get into the nucleus of your cells where it can then relatively easily cause mutations. So the issue you know, we worried before, well, maybe the RNA could be reverse transcribed into DNA. Maybe that would get into the nucleus, but now we find that we're actually being injected with double stranded DNA already with the keys that open the door to the nucleus. So it appears that, again, this was Pfizer vaccines, it appears that There is a much higher chance of mutation from the COVID shots or at least the COVID shots that have been studied.

@c_plushie - Coronavirus Plushie

@Kevin_McKernan - Kevin McKernan

I've seen someone authoritatively claim ONLY the SV40 polyA signal is present in the vaccine. This person never looked at the sequence. Here is the region with the SV40 promoter, The 72bp bidirectional SV40 Enhancer, and the SV40 Ori. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41417-018-0039-9

Increasing the bactofection capacity of a mammalian expression vector by removal of the f1 ori - Cancer Gene Therapy Bacterial-mediated cancer therapy has shown great promise in in vivo tumour models with increased survival rates post-bacterial treatment. Improving efficiency of bacterial-mediated tumour regression has focused on controlling and exacerbating bacterial cytotoxicity towards tumours. One mechanism that has been used to carry this out is the process of bactofection where post-invasion, bacteria deliver plasmid-borne mammalian genes into target cells for expression. Here we utilised the cancer-targeting Salmonella Typhimurium strain, SL7207, to carry out bactofection into triple negative breast cancer MDA-MB-231 cells. However, we noted that post-transformation with the commonly used mammalian expression vector pEGFP, S. Typhimurium became filamentous, attenuated and unable to invade target cells efficiently. Filamentation did not occur in Escherichia coli-transformed with the same plasmid. Further investigation identified the region inducing S. Typhimurium filamentation as being the f1 origin of replication (f1 ori), an artefact of historic use of mammalian plasmids for single stranded DNA production. Other f1 ori-containing plasmids also induced the attenuated phenotype, while removal of the f1 ori from pEGFP restored S. Typhimurium virulence and increased the bactofection capacity. This work has implications for interpretation of prior bactofection studies employing f1 ori-containing plasmids in S. Typhimurium, while also indicating that future use of S. Typhimurium in targeting tumours should avoid the use of these plasmids. nature.com

@c_plushie - Coronavirus Plushie

@InfiniteCyclus - Cyclus

@c_plushie The SV40 enhancer in the plasmid has a strong nuclear location signal. As explained in this nature article. In the nucleus it will integrate at random disrupting the genome and increase the risk of cancer. https://www.nature.com/articles/3302021

Effect of a DNA nuclear targeting sequence on gene transfer and expression of plasmids in the intact vasculature - Gene Therapy Although the use of nonviral vectors for gene therapy offers distinct advantages including the lack of significant inflammatory and immune responses, the levels of expression in vivo remain much lower than those obtained with their viral counterparts. One reason for such low expression is that unlike many viruses, plasmids have not evolved mechanisms to target to the nucleus of the nondividing cell. In the absence of mitosis, plasmids are imported into the nucleus in a sequence-specific manner, and we have shown in cultured cells by transfection and microinjection experiments that the SV40 enhancer mediates plasmid nuclear import in all cell types tested (Dean et al., 1999, Exp Cell Res 253: 713–722). To test the effect of this import sequence on gene transfer in the intact animal, we have recently developed an electroporation method for DNA delivery to the intact mesenteric vasculature of the rat. Plasmids expressing luciferase or GFP from the CMV immediate-early promoter/enhancer and either containing or lacking the SV40 enhancer downstream of the reporter gene were transferred to the vasculature by electroporation. When transfected into actively dividing populations of smooth muscle or epithelial cells, the plasmids gave similar levels of expression. By contrast, the presence of the SV40 sequence greatly enhanced gene expression of both reporters in the target tissue. At 2 days post-transfer, plasmids with the SV40 sequence gave 10-fold higher levels of luciferase expression, and at 3 days the difference was over 40-fold. The presence of the SV40 sequence did not simply increase the rate of nuclear import and expression, since expression from the SV40-lacking plasmid did not increase beyond that seen at day 2, the time of maximum expression for either plasmid. In situ hybridization experiments confirmed that the increased gene transfer and expression was indeed due to increased nuclear localization of the delivered SV40 sequence-containing plasmid. Based on these findings, the ability to target DNA to the nucleus can increase gene transfer in vivo and inclusion of the SV40 sequence into plasmids will enhance nonviral gene delivery. nature.com

@c_plushie - Coronavirus Plushie

Substack from @Kevin_McKernan https://anandamide.substack.com/p/south-carolina-senate-hearing

South Carolina Senate Hearing Dr. Phillip Buckhaults anandamide.substack.com

@c_plushie - Coronavirus Plushie

@Kevin_McKernan - Kevin McKernan

More labs find more DNA contamination in the shots. MMD tests 4 lots. Finds DNA in all of them. @weldeiry @P_J_Buckhaults @SenRonJohnson @DrJBhattacharya @JanciToxDoc @JanJekielek @P_McCulloughMD @RWMaloneMD @US_FDA @CDCgov

@AnwaltUlbrich - Tobias Ulbrich

NEW!!! - Topic today: "#Supergau and escalation - #DNA detected in #modRNA #vaccine #BNT162b2." NOW IT'S PROVEN - DNA IN BNT162b2! AND - BMG ignores it! Official misconduct doesn't get any crasser than this. Here clear indication of § 5 AMG - serious suspicion of a questionable…

@c_plushie - Coronavirus Plushie

@AnwaltUlbrich - Tobias Ulbrich

NEW!!! - Topic today: "#Supergau and escalation - #DNA detected in #modRNA #vaccine #BNT162b2." NOW IT'S PROVEN - DNA IN BNT162b2! AND - BMG ignores it! Official misconduct doesn't get any crasser than this. Here clear indication of § 5 AMG - serious suspicion of a questionable…

@c_plushie - Coronavirus Plushie

If you click on the post below, another thread will open up with more videos:

@c_plushie - Coronavirus Plushie

Both @NZStuff and the government told us the #Pfizer shot, which was given to millions of Kiwis, could not alter your DNA. This was 'The Whole Truth'. It was the information we could rely on, from the 'single source of truth'. And we were told to dismiss everything else as…

Video Transcript AI Summary
Two experts with degrees in biochemistry and molecular biology discuss the claim that COVID-19 vaccines alter DNA. While one expert expresses concern about DNA integration and potential long-term effects, the other clarifies that the vaccine does not enter the nucleus where DNA resides. They explain that the vaccine's DNA can integrate into the genomic DNA of cells, but it is not a temporary change and becomes a permanent part of the cell and its descendants. They emphasize that the vaccine does not contain anything that can affect DNA. The video concludes by highlighting the partnership between Stuff, Maori Television, and the Pacific Media Network, with funding from the Google News Initiative.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I have Speaker 1: a degree in biochemistry and molecular biology, and I'm a toxicologist and an expert witness as a profession nationally and internationally. Speaker 2: I have a PhD in biochemistry and molecular biology. I'm I'm, I'm a cancer gene jock. Basically, I do cancer genomics research at the University of South Carolina. Speaker 0: When was the last time you saw one of these? Probably not since high school, right? Speaker 2: The Pfizer, vaccine is contaminated with plasma DNA. Speaker 0: It's a strand of DNA, The genetic code found in almost every cell in your body containing the unique markers that make you, you. Speaker 2: So that's why I'm kind of alarmed about this DNA being in the vaccine. It's it's it's different from RNA because it can be permanent. DNA gets transcribed into and then RNA gets translated into protein. DNA is a long lived information storage device. What you born with, you're gonna die with and pass on to your kids. DNA lasts for 100 of 1000 of years, and it can last for generations if you Pass it on to your kids. Right? So alterations to the DNA, they stick around. Speaker 0: Well, recently, I've heard a pretty scary rumour doing the rounds. A claim that COVID nineteen vaccines actually alter your DNA. So is it true? Here's the important part. The vaccine never enters the nucleus of your cells. That is where your DNA lives. Speaker 2: This DNA, can and likely will integrate into the genomic DNA of cells that got transfected with the vaccine mix. This is just The way it works, we do this in the lab all the time. We take pieces of DNA, we mix them up with a lipid complex like the Pfizer Vaccine is in, we pour it onto cells and and a lot of it gets into the cells and a lot of it gets into the DNA of those cells and it becomes a permanent fixture of the cell. It's not just a temporary, a temporary thing. It is in that cell and all of its progeny from now on forevermore. Amen. Speaker 1: So all this about they will not go to the nucleus Speaker 0: The vaccine never enters the nucleus of your cells Speaker 1: They will not integrate with your DNA Speaker 0: The vaccine does not contain anything that can affect your DNA. Speaker 1: Is not true and they knew it from the beginning because they knew the plasmids were there. Speaker 0: So there you have it. If you were worried about the vaccine changing your DNA, fear not. Speaker 2: This DNA, can and likely It'll integrate into the genomic DNA of cells that got transfected with the vaccine mix. Speaker 0: Fear not. Speaker 3: The double stranded DNA that is in the plasmids work to allow that D NAA to get into the nucleus of your cells Where it can then relatively easily cause mutations. Speaker 0: Fear not. Speaker 1: There is something very unusual going on here That is being done differently than it's ever been done before. We don't give experimental products to pregnant We don't give experimental products to babies that have a death profile like this. It's not done. It's never Been done before. Speaker 0: Fear not. Speaker 1: I've never seen anything like this in my entire career. We have got to pull these shots and restrict them from our children. We cannot inject these into babies and children. These are contaminated, dangerous, lethal products. Speaker 0: The whole truth about the COVID vaccine is a series from Stuff made in partnership with Maori Television and the Pacific Media Network. Speaker 2: I'm kind of an expert on all the ways that the human genome can get fussed with during your lifetime and which of those things cause cancer and which ones don't. Speaker 0: We received Funding from the Google News Initiative.

@c_plushie - Coronavirus Plushie

@sophiadahl1 - Sophia Dahl

@Incrementallog1 @djindji5 @DisclosureUAP @BarbarasGhost1 @liz_churchill10 @PatientCV @jamesroguski @Najadi4Justice @Nonvaxer420BACK @KathMLee1 @MegnaAve @freemoneyman420 @mariaaazeee @NickHudsonCT @drvandanashiva @bell00david @BrianOSheaSPI @IamBrookJackson @naomirwolf @gc22gc @SenseReceptor @Kingston_Truth @DavebNixon @Berniespofforth @Doctor_I_am_The @VeraSharav @ShabnamPalesaMo @BarelyBook @davidicke @_jenniferlong @Thomas_Binder @NoorBinLadin @AllBiteNoBark88 @MarkFriesen08 @KLVeritas @jathorpmfm @ABridgen @NassMeryl @DrAnaMihalcea @RenzTom @Stuckelberger @XOPlanetMother @carrie_madej @BanounHelene @P_J_Buckhaults @sasha_latypova @JanciToxDoc @DrDMartinWorld @JesslovesMJK @Kevin_McKernan Dr.Sucharit Bhakdi:"There is NO way to be sure you have removed all the #DNA(books of life)from the manufacturing soup of these #mRNA vax,when manufacturing on mass scale."‼️ "It's too expensive to remove it. Every mRNA vax released to the market is cont@minated."‼️🙏👇 #vaccine

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the potential contamination of RNA vaccines and the lack of control and regulation surrounding their authorization. They mention that purification methods may fail, resulting in the presence of remaining books of life in the vaccines. The speaker expresses concern over the automatic authorization of future RNA vaccines without considering efficacy, safety, or contamination. They highlight that the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) have declared their intention to implement RNA vaccination in all areas of human and veterinary medicine. The conversation ends with a comment about the situation being concerning.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So they would have had some form of purification method, whatever it is, it's failed. Is that would be a fake Well, you Speaker 1: see yeah. If if you do this on a on a small scale, you can really, purify the the copies, and leave the books behind. But if you're doing this on a mass scale, there's no way there is no way, to to really be sure that you haven't, remaining books of life in the soup, okay? And that's why every RNA vaccine that is being released to the market is bound to be similarly contaminated. It's bound to be. Okay? And the horrible and awful thing that just occurred last week is that, all the authorities, the FDA, whatever you want. And the WHO and the CDC, I don't know who has done all of this, have decided that all future RNA vaccines are going to be automatically authorized without any control at all, neither for efficacy nor for safety nor for contamination. And as you know, the WHO and the CDC have declared that they're going to, install RNA vaccination in all realms of, human and veterinary medicine for all vaccines and they've started already. Speaker 0: So It's just a polling.

@c_plushie - Coronavirus Plushie

Effect of a DNA nuclear targeting sequence on gene transfer and expression of plasmids in the intact vasculature https://www.nature.com/articles/3302021

Effect of a DNA nuclear targeting sequence on gene transfer and expression of plasmids in the intact vasculature - Gene Therapy Although the use of nonviral vectors for gene therapy offers distinct advantages including the lack of significant inflammatory and immune responses, the levels of expression in vivo remain much lower than those obtained with their viral counterparts. One reason for such low expression is that unlike many viruses, plasmids have not evolved mechanisms to target to the nucleus of the nondividing cell. In the absence of mitosis, plasmids are imported into the nucleus in a sequence-specific manner, and we have shown in cultured cells by transfection and microinjection experiments that the SV40 enhancer mediates plasmid nuclear import in all cell types tested (Dean et al., 1999, Exp Cell Res 253: 713–722). To test the effect of this import sequence on gene transfer in the intact animal, we have recently developed an electroporation method for DNA delivery to the intact mesenteric vasculature of the rat. Plasmids expressing luciferase or GFP from the CMV immediate-early promoter/enhancer and either containing or lacking the SV40 enhancer downstream of the reporter gene were transferred to the vasculature by electroporation. When transfected into actively dividing populations of smooth muscle or epithelial cells, the plasmids gave similar levels of expression. By contrast, the presence of the SV40 sequence greatly enhanced gene expression of both reporters in the target tissue. At 2 days post-transfer, plasmids with the SV40 sequence gave 10-fold higher levels of luciferase expression, and at 3 days the difference was over 40-fold. The presence of the SV40 sequence did not simply increase the rate of nuclear import and expression, since expression from the SV40-lacking plasmid did not increase beyond that seen at day 2, the time of maximum expression for either plasmid. In situ hybridization experiments confirmed that the increased gene transfer and expression was indeed due to increased nuclear localization of the delivered SV40 sequence-containing plasmid. Based on these findings, the ability to target DNA to the nucleus can increase gene transfer in vivo and inclusion of the SV40 sequence into plasmids will enhance nonviral gene delivery. nature.com

@c_plushie - Coronavirus Plushie

Paper referenced in the above nature article. h/t @InfiniteCyclus "We show that, although fragments throughout this region can support varying degrees of nuclear import, the 72 bp repeats of the SV40 enhancer facilitate maximal transport." https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4152905/

Sequence requirements for plasmid nuclear import The nuclear envelope is a major barrier for nuclear uptake of plasmids and represents one of the most significant unsolved problems of non-viral gene delivery. We have previously shown that the nuclear entry of plasmid DNA is sequence-specific, requiring ... ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

@c_plushie - Coronavirus Plushie

EXCLUSIVE: An interview with Buckhaults about DNA contamination in covid vaccines, and the FDA responds @MaryanneDemasi https://maryannedemasi.substack.com/p/exclusive-an-interview-with-buckhaults?r=p03ac&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web

EXCLUSIVE: An interview with Buckhaults about DNA contamination in covid vaccines... and the FDA responds Earlier this year, genomics expert Kevin McKernan first discovered DNA contamination in vials of Pfizer and Moderna’s bivalent booster shots. He published his findings in a pre-print, but the research received little attention from the mainstream media. maryannedemasi.substack.com

@c_plushie - Coronavirus Plushie

Researchers “alarmed” to find DNA contamination in Pfizer covid-19 vaccine https://maryannedemasi.substack.com/p/researchers-alarmed-to-find-dna-contamination

Researchers “alarmed” to find DNA contamination in Pfizer covid-19 vaccine A researcher testifies before a South Carolina Senate hearing about the discovery of DNA contamination found in Pfizer’s mRNA vaccine maryannedemasi.substack.com
iluminatibot
Posted - September 24, 2023 at 10:43 PM
Saved - September 25, 2023 at 5:44 AM

@iluminatibot - illuminatibot

"The Pfizer vaccine is contaminated with plasmid DNA, it's not just mRNA, it’s got bits of DNA in it." - Professor Phillip Buckhaults, Phd in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. He does cancer genomics research at the University of South Carolina.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the presence of DNA in the Pfizer vaccine and expresses concern about its potential consequences. They explain that they sequenced the DNA in the vaccine and found it surprising that any DNA was present. The speaker suggests that this DNA could be causing rare but serious side effects, such as death from cardiac arrest. They also mention that the DNA could integrate into the genomic DNA of cells, potentially leading to genome modification, autoimmune attacks, or even future cancer. The speaker acknowledges that these concerns are theoretical but believes they warrant further investigation.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: That's a very good question. I think In many circumstances, there could be malice underneath but I'm trying to see just incompetence to be gracious. Sure a vaccine is contaminated with plasma DNA. It's not just mRNA. It's got bits of DNA in this DNA is the DNA vector that was used as the template for the in vitro transcription action when they made the mRNA. I know this is true because I sequenced it in my own lab. The vials of Pfizer vaccine that were out here in Columbia. One of my colleagues was in charge of that vaccination program in the college of pharmacy. And for reasons I still don't understand he kept every single vial. So he had a whole freezer full of the empty vials. Well, the empty vials have a little tiny bit in the bottom of them. He gave them all to me and I looked at them. We had 2 batches that were given out here in Columbia. And I checked these 2 batches and I checked them by sequencing. And I sequenced all the DNA that was in the vaccine and I can see what's in there. And it's surprising that there's any DNA in there. And you can kind of work out what it is and how it got there. And I'm kind of alarmed about the possible consequences of both in terms of human health and biology, but you should be alarmed about the regulatory process that allowed it there. So this DNA, in my view, it could be causing some of the rare but serious side effects, like death from cardiac arrest. There's a lot of cases now of people having suspicious death after vaccine. It's hard to prove what caused it. It's just temporally associated. Mechanism. This DNA can and likely will integrate into the genomic DNA of cells that got transfected with the vaccine mix. We do this in the lab all the time. We take pieces of DNA and we mix them up with a lipid complex like the Pfizer vaccine is in. We pour it onto cells and a lot of it gets into the cells and a lot of it gets into the DNA of those cells and it becomes permanent fixture of the cell. It's not just a temporary thing. It is in that cell and all of its progeny from now on forevermore. Amen. So that's why I'm kind of alarmed about this DNA being in the vaccine. It's different from RNA because it can be permanent. This is a real hazard for genome modification of long lived somatic cells like stem cells. And it could cause theoretically, this is all a theoretical concern but it's pretty reasonable based on solid molecular biology that It could cause a sustained autoimmune attack toward that tissue. It's also a very real theoretical risk of future cancer in some people. Depending on where in the genome this foreign piece of DNA lands, it can interrupt a tumor suppressor or activate an Kajim. I think it'll be rare but I think the risk is not zero and it may be high enough that we are to figure out if this is happening or not. And again, market. I think we've got a lot of
robinmonotti
Posted - October 9, 2023 at 8:17 PM
Saved - October 10, 2023 at 12:28 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Dr. Janci Chunn Lindsay, a renowned expert in Toxicology and Molecular Biology, highlights nine concerning links between Covid19 injections and cancer. Her extensive background in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology adds credibility to her claims.

@robinmonotti - Robin Monotti

Nine ways Covid19 injections cause cancer (and counting). Dr. Janci Chunn Lindsay is the Director of Toxicology and Molecular Biology for Toxicology Support Services, LLC. She holds a doctorate in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology from the University of Texas Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center-Houston

robinmonotti
Posted - October 19, 2023 at 4:34 PM
Saved - October 19, 2023 at 6:55 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Health Canada has confirmed the presence of a DNA sequence, SV40, in the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine that was not disclosed by the manufacturer. SV40 is a virus associated with cancer, but its significance is debated. Scientists have raised concerns about potential genome alteration. SV40 was previously removed from polio vaccines due to cancer concerns. The presence of SV40 promoters near oncogenes is worrisome. A professor noted a higher incidence of cancers following COVID-19 vaccination. Pfizer has not commented on the issue.

@robinmonotti - Robin Monotti

EXCLUSIVE: Health Canada Confirms Undisclosed Presence of DNA Sequence in Pfizer Shot "Health Canada has confirmed the presence of a Simian Virus 40 (SV40) DNA sequence in the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine, which the manufacturer had not previously disclosed. There is debate among scientists with regards to the significance of the finding, with some saying it has the potential to cause cancer, and others saying it poses little to no threat. "Health Canada expects sponsors to identify any biologically functional DNA sequences within a plasmid (such as an SV40 enhancer) at the time of submission," the agency said in an email to The Epoch Times. "Although the full DNA sequence of the Pfizer plasmid was provided at the time of initial filing, the sponsor did not specifically identify the SV40 sequence." The regulator said that after scientists Kevin McKernan and Dr. Phillip J. Buckhaults publicly raised the presence of SV40 enhancers in the vaccines earlier this year, “it was possible for Health Canada to confirm the presence of the enhancer based on the plasmid DNA sequence submitted by Pfizer against the published SV40 enhancer sequence." Both scientists have made waves after discovering plasmid DNA in the mRNA COVID-19 injections, warning it could potentially alter the human genome. However, the two share different degrees of concern about the significance of an SV40 sequence—which is used as an enhancer to drive gene transcription during the vaccine manufacturing process—being present in the shots. Mr. McKernan, a former researcher and team leader for the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Human Genome Project, told The Epoch Times he suspects Pfizer didn’t disclose the presence of the DNA sequence due to the association of SV40 with polio vaccines. He said while there is no evidence the sequence is carcinogenic, he has concerns about its integration into the human genome. The polyomavirus Simian Virus 40, an oncogenic DNA virus, was previously removed from polio vaccines due to concerns about a link to cancers. Polio vaccines used in the late 1950s and early 1960s were found to be contaminated with SV40 as the virus was present in monkey kidney cells that were used to grow the vaccine. Mr. McKernan said while the full 5kb SV40 virus was present in the polio vaccines, the presence of SV40 promoters was still concerning due to the risk of them integrating into the human genomes near oncogenes, which are genes that have the potential to cause cancer Angus Dalgleish, professor of oncology at St. George's Hospital Medical School in London, recently wrote in The Conservative Woman about a higher incidence of cancers following COVID-19 vaccination seen by himself and his colleagues, including an “epidemic of explosive cancers” with multiple metastatic spread. He noted the potential “DNA plasmid and SV40 integration in promoting cancer development.” Dr. Lindsay questioned why Pfizer failed to disclose the SV40 promoter to regulators like the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, the European Medicines Agency, and Health Canada. "They hid them. So it's not just the fact that they're there, it's the fact that they were purposefully hidden from the regulators," she said. Pfizer did not respond to The Epoch Times' request for comment."

@robinmonotti - Robin Monotti

https://www.theepochtimes.com/world/exclusive-health-canada-confirms-undisclosed-presence-of-dna-sequence-in-pfizer-shot-5513277 @EpochTimes

EXCLUSIVE: Health Canada Confirms Undisclosed Presence of DNA Sequence in Pfizer Shot The health regulator says Pfizer did not disclose the presence of the Simian Virus 40 (SV40) DNA sequence in its mRNA COVID-19 vaccine at the time of filing. theepochtimes.com
PaulMitchell_AB
Posted - October 20, 2023 at 3:13 AM
Saved - October 20, 2023 at 2:40 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Health Canada has confirmed the presence of Simian Virus 40 (SV40) DNA in the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine, which was not disclosed by the manufacturer. SV40, a cancer-causing virus, was previously removed from polio vaccines. Dr. Janci Lindsay, director of toxicology, warns that these DNA sequences could contribute to cancer. The intentional hiding of this information raises concerns. Criminal prosecutions should be considered. People were deceived, coerced, and discriminated against, undermining the "safe and effective" narrative. No amnesty should be granted.

@PaulMitchell_AB - Paul Mitchell

"Health Canada has confirmed the presence of a Simian Virus 40 (SV40) DNA sequence in the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine, which the manufacturer had not previously disclosed" "The polyomavirus Simian Virus 40, an oncogenic DNA virus, was previously removed from polio vaccines due to concerns about a link to cancers." "Dr. Janci Lindsay, the director of toxicology and molecular biology for Toxicology Support Services, said plasmid DNA sequences, such as the SV40 enhancer, could be oncogenic and contribute to causing cancers." "They hid them. So it's not just the fact that they're there, it's the fact that they were purposefully hidden from the regulators" Full article is here 👇 https://theepochtimes.com/world/exclusive-health-canada-confirms-undisclosed-presence-of-dna-sequence-in-pfizer-shot-5513277

EXCLUSIVE: Health Canada Confirms Undisclosed Presence of DNA Sequence in Pfizer Shot The health regulator says Pfizer did not disclose the presence of the Simian Virus 40 (SV40) DNA sequence in its mRNA COVID-19 vaccine at the time of filing. theepochtimes.com

@PaulMitchell_AB - Paul Mitchell

So, when do the criminal prosecutions begin? People were lied to, they were coerced, they were discriminated against and now it turn out that the whole "safe and effective" narrative was utter bullshit. No amnesty.

@PaulMitchell_AB - Paul Mitchell

https://x.com/Matt_HorwoodET/status/1715034729429238208?s=20

@Matt_HorwoodET - Matthew Horwood

For those of you asking for a source for the SV40 sequence claim, Health Canada emailed us this response to our question on July 28, 2023.

ABridgen
Posted - October 22, 2023 at 8:55 AM
Saved - October 22, 2023 at 3:22 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The approved Covid-19 vaccine differs from what was given to the public. The clinical trial used one process, but production switched to another, posing different risks. The Pfizer vaccine contains undisclosed components, including SV40, not mentioned to regulators or patients. Watch the full video for more details.

@ABridgen - Andrew Bridgen

The Covid-19 'Vaccine' Approved by Regulators Isn't What Was Given to the Public Full video: https://worldcouncilforhealth.org/multimedia/kevin-mckernan-plasmid-mrna-vaccines/ 🇺🇸 Kevin McKernan: "This all started back in April with this preprint where we did this RNA sequencing that Mark [Trozzi] was just mentioning. [...] What is not in that preprint is something that Retsef Levi and Josh Guetzkow presented in the BMJ, which is that the vials that were in fact approved are not the vials that were given to the public. The clinical trial was run on something known as Process 1 that used PCR to make the DNA that was going to then turn into the RNA to make the spike protein. Once the trial was complete, they switched. This is a big bait and switch. They moved to a production process that manufactured this DNA in E.coli. And with that, comes a different risk. "Upon sequencing these, I think the most striking revelation was that the Pfizer vaccines actually had a component that was not disclosed to the regulators. This plasmid map on the right is what was disclosed to the EMA. And there is no mention of the SV40 components that are that are now known to be inside this DNA sequence. The plasmid on the left is what we actually found, very similar in length, but has all of these other components in it that are not disclosed to the regulators, nor to the patients taking these." Find this video to share on Rumble, Twitter, Odysee, Facebook, Gettr & Bitchute. Watch full hearing & sign up for updates: https://worldcouncilforhealth.org/dna Follow: ➡️@WCH_org 📧 NEWSLETTER | 🌳 LINKTREE 🌐 http://WorldCouncilforHealth.org

Kevin McKernan: Plasmid Derived dsDNA Contamination in mRNA "Vaccines" Kevin McKernan sequenced nucleic acid in Moderna and Pfizer vials and found that as much as 35% was DNA from bacterial plasmids. worldcouncilforhealth.org
Urgent Expert Hearing on Reports of DNA Contamination in mRNA Vaccines In light of recent reports of DNA contamination in mRNA vaccines, WCH has organized an Urgent Expert Hearing on this critical topic. worldcouncilforhealth.org
World Council for Health | There's A Better Way World Council for Health is a non-profit organization for the people that seeks to broaden public health knowledge and sense-making through science. worldcouncilforhealth.org
iluminatibot
Posted - November 14, 2023 at 6:45 AM
Saved - November 14, 2023 at 1:00 PM

@iluminatibot - illuminatibot

"The Pfizer vaccine is contaminated with plasmid DNA, it's not just mRNA, it’s got bits of DNA in it." - Professor Phillip Buckhaults, Phd in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. He does cancer genomics research at the University of South Carolina. https://t.co/DGyLZbLVJH

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the presence of DNA in the Pfizer vaccine and expresses concern about its potential consequences. They explain that they sequenced the DNA in the vaccine and found it surprising that any DNA was present. The speaker suggests that this DNA could be causing rare but serious side effects, such as death from cardiac arrest. They also mention that the DNA could integrate into the genomic DNA of cells, potentially leading to genome modification and autoimmune attacks. There is a theoretical risk of future cancer as well. The speaker emphasizes the need to investigate these concerns further.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: That's a very good question. I think In many circumstances, there could be malice underneath but I'm trying to see just incompetence to be gracious. Sure a vaccine is contaminated with plasma DNA. It's not just mRNA. It's got bits of DNA in this DNA is the DNA vector that was used as the template for the in vitro transcription action when they made the mRNA. I know this is true because I sequenced it in my own lab. The vials of Pfizer vaccine that were out here in Columbia. One of my colleagues was in charge of that vaccination program in the college of pharmacy. And for reasons I still don't understand he kept every single vial. So he had a whole freezer full of the empty vials. Well, the empty vials have a little tiny bit in the bottom of them. He gave them all to me and I looked at them. We had 2 batches that were given out here in Columbia. And I checked these 2 batches and I checked them by sequencing. And I sequenced all the DNA that was in the vaccine and I can see what's in there. And it's surprising that there's any DNA in there. And you can kind of work out what it is and how it got there. And I'm kind of alarmed about the possible consequences of both in terms of human health and biology, but you should be alarmed about the regulatory process that allowed it there. So this DNA, in my view, it could be causing some of the rare but serious side effects like death from cardiac arrest. There's a lot of cases now of people having suspicious death after vaccine. It's hard to prove what caused it. It's just temporally associated. Mechanism. This DNA can and likely will integrate into the genomic DNA of cells that got transfected with the vaccine mix. This is just the way it works. We do this in the lab all the time. We take pieces of DNA and we mix them up with a lipid complex like the Pfizer vaccine is in. We pour it onto cells and a lot of it gets into the cells and a lot of it gets into the DNA of those cells and it becomes permanent fixture of the cell. It's not just a temporary thing. It is in that cell and all of its progeny from now on forevermore. Amen. So that's why I'm kind of alarmed about this DNA being in the vaccine. It's different from RNA because it can be permanent. This is a real hazard for genome modification of long lived somatic cells like stem cells. And it could cause theoretically, this is all a theoretical concern but it's pretty reasonable based on solid molecular biology that It could cause a sustained autoimmune attack toward that tissue. It's also a very real theoretical risk of future cancer in some people. Depending on where in the genome this foreign piece of DNA lands, it can interrupt a tumor suppressor or activate an Kajim. I think it'll be rare but I think the risk is not zero and it may be high enough that we are to figure out if this is happening or not. And again, but it's not a problem. So we're going to have to go back to the
CalenArcher
Posted - January 10, 2024 at 3:52 PM
Saved - January 16, 2024 at 8:56 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The posts discuss concerns about the Covid-19 vaccines, including potential DNA contamination, DNA integration, and the presence of a cancer-promoting genetic sequence. The author questions the lack of evidence provided by the FDA and calls for transparency and accountability. They believe there is a conspiracy to suppress information and urge others to share and expose the situation.

@CalenArcher - American Archer

🚨CRITICAL THREAD INCOMING - REPOST AND SHARE🚨 FL Surgeon General is halting the use of Covid 19 vaccines Citing foreign DNA contamination and profit seeking behavior by the government. This is huge - but what damage has been done to those who are vaccinated or boosted 10 times Continue reading - the information is beyond shocking

@CalenArcher - American Archer

In 2007 the FDA established guidelines for regulatory limits on DNA Vaccines - specifically regarding DNA Integration - DNA integration could theoretically impact a human's oncogenes (a gene which is capable of causing cancer) - DNA Integration may also result in chromosomal instability With these guidelines - The Guidance for Industry discussed the biodistribution of DNA vaccines and how DNA integration could affect unintended parts of the body (sound familiar) Including the: blood, heart, brain, kidney, bone marrow, ovaries/testes, liver, lung, spleen, draining of lymph nodes, and sites of administration.

@CalenArcher - American Archer

To Dr. Ladapo's statement: "The FDA's response does not provide data or evidence that the DNA Integration assessments they recommend themselves have been performed. DNA integration poses a unique and elevated risk to human health and to the integrity of the human genome, including the risk that DNA integrated into sperm or egg gametes could be passed onto offspring of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine recipients..." Dr. Ladapo has rightly called out the FDA for rushing the vaccine out without providing evidence - if they even have any - and is refusing to subject patients to the great unknown, specifically when it involves DNA integration.

@CalenArcher - American Archer

In possibly the most shocking revelation - the World Council of Health has stated that the mRNA vaccine contains a cancer-promoting genetic sequence - SV40 - and has been found in all vials of the BioNTech vials disseminated for public use Here's the kicker - this was NOT present in the vials used for the approval studies, but is in every vial that the public receives READ THAT AGAIN.

@CalenArcher - American Archer

The pharmaceutical companies that produced the Covid-19 mRNA vaccine - through bait and switch - got the vaccines through the trials with one vaccine, and are distributing another. We do not have widespread data on the vaccine causing cancer currently - however we do have data on excess deaths, adverse events, and ineffectiveness. The media, government, and Medical Industrial Complex DO NOT want this information out in the public - as they have made it all but a crime to criticize the "science" aka Dr. Fauci. The conspiracy contributes to grow regarding these 'vaccines' - and the evidence continues to mount - we need to push for transparency and accountability. Repost and Share - we need to expose this NOW

c_plushie
Posted - January 15, 2024 at 9:52 PM
Saved - January 16, 2024 at 11:18 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The Pfizer shot, given to millions in New Zealand, was believed to not integrate with DNA. However, Dr. Joseph Ladapo, Surgeon General of Florida, stated that foreign DNA could enter cells through the mRNA COVID vax. Dr. Janci Lindsay and Dr. Phillip Buckhaults testified that the Pfizer shot is contaminated with DNA and SV40 sequences, which can alter genetic code, infect E.coli, and cause cancer. Full testimonies are available. #Pfizer #mRNA #COVIDvax

@c_plushie - Coronavirus Plushie

Both @NZStuff and the government told us the #Pfizer shot, which was given to millions of Kiwis, could not integrate with your DNA. This was 'The Whole Truth'. It was the information we could rely on, from the 'single source of truth', and we were told to dismiss everything else as misinformation. @JanciToxDoc @jehancasinader @NassMeryl @nzdsos @HopeRising19 @nzfirst @TuckerCarlson @FLSurgeonGen @MurfittTauranga

Video Transcript AI Summary
I have a degree in biochemistry and molecular biology and work as a toxicologist and expert witness. The Pfizer vaccine is said to be contaminated with plasma DNA, which is different from RNA as it can be permanent and passed on to future generations. However, the vaccine does not enter the nucleus where DNA resides. The DNA in the vaccine can integrate into the genomic DNA of cells, becoming a permanent part of the cell. Despite claims that the vaccine alters DNA, it does not contain anything that can affect DNA. The concerns raised about the vaccine's impact on DNA are unfounded.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I have a degree in biochemistry and molecular biology. And I'm a toxicologist and an expert witness as a profession nationally and Speaker 1: I have a PhD in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. I'm a cancer gene jock. Basically I do cancer Genomics Research at the University of South Carolina When was the Speaker 2: last time you saw one of these? Probably not since high school, right? Speaker 1: The Pfizer vaccine is contaminated with plasma DNA. Speaker 2: It's a strand of DNA. The genetic code found in almost every cell in your body containing the unique markers that make you, you. Speaker 1: So that's why I'm kind of alarmed about this DNA Being in the vaccine, it's different from RNA because it can be permanent DNA gets transcribed into RNA and then RNA gets translated into protein DNA is a long lived information storage device What you were born with, you're going to die with and pass on to your kids DNA lasts for 100 of 1000 of years. And it can last for generations if you pass it on to your kids. Right? So, alterations To the DNA, they stick around. Speaker 2: Well recently I've heard a pretty scary rumour doing the rounds. A claim that COVID nineteen vaccines alter your DNA. So is it true? Here's the important part. The vaccine never enters the nucleus of your cells. That is where your DNA lives. Speaker 1: This DNA can and likely will integrate into the genomic DNA of cells that got transfected with the vaccine mix. This is just the way it works. We do this in the lab all the time. We take pieces the DNA, we mix them up with a lipid complex like the Pfizer vaccine is in. We pour it onto cells and a lot of it gets into the cells and a lot of it gets into the DNA of those cells and it becomes a permanent fixture of the cell. It's not just a temporary thing. It is in that Speaker 0: So all of this about they will not go to the nucleus Speaker 2: See never enters the nucleus of your cells. Speaker 0: They will not integrate with your DNA. Speaker 2: The vaccine does not contain anything that can affect Your DNA Speaker 0: is not true and they knew it from the beginning because they knew the plasmids were there. Speaker 2: So there you have it. If you were worried about the vaccine changing your DNA, fear not. Speaker 1: This DNA, can and likely will integrate into the genomic DNA of cells that got transfected with the vaccine mix. Speaker 2: Fear not. Speaker 3: The double stranded DNA that is in the plasmids work to allow that DNA a to get into the nucleus of your cells Where it can then relatively easily cause mutations. Fear not. Speaker 0: There is something very unusual going on here that is being done differently The babies that have a death profile like this. It's not done. It's never been done before. Speaker 2: Fear not. Speaker 0: I've never seen anything like this in my entire career. We have got to pull these shots and restrict them from our children. We cannot Not inject these into babies and children. These are contaminated, dangerous, lethal products. Speaker 2: The whole truth about the COVID vaccine is a series from Stuff made in partnership with Maori Television and the Pacific Media Network. Speaker 1: I'm kind of an expert on all the ways that the human genome can get futsed with during your lifetime, and which of those things cause cancer and which ones don't. Speaker 2: We received Funding from the Google News Initiative.

@TuckerCarlson - Tucker Carlson

Could foreign DNA enter your cells through the mRNA COVID vax and change your DNA — and humanity itself — forever? Sounds nutty. It's not. "Absolutely that could happen," says Dr. Joseph Ladapo, the surgeon general of Florida. A shocking conversation. https://t.co/Yvt38eStPf

Video Transcript AI Summary
The Surgeon General of Florida, Dr. Joseph Laudipo, has called for a halt to the use of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines due to concerns about DNA integration with the human genome. He explains that these vaccines contain DNA, which is not necessarily a problem on its own, but becomes an issue because the DNA hangs on with the mRNA and enters people's cells. This is different from other products that have DNA. The FDA's failure to test for DNA integration, despite their own guidelines, is deemed intolerable. Dr. Laudipo emphasizes the need for specific tests to confirm that foreign DNA is not integrating into the human genome.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Very few public health officials in this country seem very interested in public health in case you haven't noticed. The Surgeon General of Florida, doctor Joseph Laudipo, is an exception to that. He is interested in the health of the people of his state. And because he is, he's taken a close look at what's in the COVID vax the one that everyone in the country was required to take not so long ago and he's come up short he can answer some basic questions about it and that's a concern if we're doing science which he is and so he has now called on doctors to immediately stop giving the mRNA COVID vax to their patients and for a very interesting reason that you should know about here's his statement we're quoting I'm calling for a halt to the use of mRNA COVID-nineteen vaccines scenes. The U. S. Food and Drug Administration and the Centers For Disease Control and Prevention have always played it fast and loose with COVID nineteen vaccine safety. But their failure to test for DNA integration with the human genome as their own guidelines dictate when the vaccines are known to be contaminated with foreign DNA is intolerable think about that it's one thing if it gives you a heart attack if it tempers with your DNA in some way now we have a real problem considering a 1,000,000,000 people got it so in a recent interview about the MRA vaccines the Surgeon General of Florida described them this way Speaker 1: These vaccines have DNA in them. Everyone knows what DNA is. They're contaminated with DNA, and that's not necessarily a big deal. But it's a problem with these vaccines because the DNA hangs on with the mRNA and goes into people's cells. So this is a completely different risk analysis than other products that have had DNA. These vaccines are honestly, they're they're the antichrist Of all products. Speaker 0: The antichrist of all products. The surgeon general of Florida joins us now to playing what he means. Doctor, thank you so much for coming on. I remember at the beginning of the its mandates there were people on the fringes as we say who raised questions about the the potential of this drug this brand new this novel vaccine which wasn't really a vaccine to affect people's DNA and they were immediately described as crazy. Tell us your concerns if you wouldn't mind flushing out a little bit what we saw in that clip. Speaker 1: You know, it's It's so interesting to hear you say that, Tucker, because I had the same impression when people very early on were reciting concerns about DNA. I think that really what was happening is that their intuition was informing them about a potential problem with these vaccines. And, you know, you showed that clip there. This one is is sometimes I honestly, I feel quite guilty dragging people through the scientific details, but I try and do it at a level that hopefully won't bore people to to death or be too painful because it is a very important issue And it's not a complicated issue and it's important for people to recognize the difference between the honest facts, which is what I'm sharing and the spin and dodge and look over here that you hear doctor Kalief at the FDA and other, you know, doctor Offutt, other people sharing. So it's actually very simple. We all know what DNA is, You know, this is this is our genetic blueprint, our gift from God. And this DNA can be affected and that can be obviously a very bad thing. Sometimes it's affected in a way that makes people sick. Sometimes it can even be infected in a way that leads people to pass on characteristics to their to their offspring. In this particular case with the mRNA vaccines, They have DNA in them like, you know, like many other vaccines or other biologic type of medications And that, as I've said previously, is not such a big deal because fortunately, DNA is not some big hairy monster that Can, you know, live forever when it's foreign in people's bodies. Our bodies have lots of mechanisms to break them down. But the problem here is that you know the for the same reason that scientists won a Nobel Prize, this DNA isn't like other DNA in terms of having a very hard time penetrating into cells. This DNA hangs on with mRNA in that lipid nano particle that people hear and frankly probably roll their eyes out their eyes over. It hangs on with it and it comes into the cells almost certainly hitchhiking along with the mRNA. So Whereas in the past, DNA would have a very hard time even entering cells. Here, the DNA is getting delivered into cells with the lipid nanoparticles. And that's a problem. And that's a problem because each dose of mRNA COVID nineteen vaccine Probably contains, it's been estimated between billions and hundreds of billions of fragments of DNA. So this is a completely Different risk analysis. That is obvious. You don't need a PhD to be able to figure that out. And the FDA's own guidance About contaminating DNA. Published guidance, their words, never referred to by them by the way in their counter arguments. But their words Are that there are situations when you need to confirm that DNA that is a contaminant or foreign DNA is not integrating into human DNA, into the human genome and there are specific tests, sequencing test to do this, to make sure it's done. And what we did is we asked the FDA, Well, have you done this? You've acknowledged this risk. Have you done this? And they came back with about 10,000 words talking about everything from what time the sun sets in China to, you know, their their third cousins, you know, Bar Mitzvah And nothing about the specific question we ask, along with other questions, by the way, but nothing about that, which leads me to conclude They haven't done it, which is I mean, they you know, it it starts at crazy, but it ends at somewhere else. That someone could be just So just so nonchalant and frankly, willy nilly with something as precious and as, you know, sacred as our human DNA. So that's

@c_plushie - Coronavirus Plushie

Thread from last year https://t.co/AGcbISG3Io

@c_plushie - Coronavirus Plushie

🧵 THREAD DNA & SV40 In The #Pfizer Shot Dr. Janci Lindsay & Dr. Phillip Buckhaults testify that the Pfizer shot has been found to be contaminated with DNA, which can permanently alter your genetic code, and SV40 sequences which can infect the E.coli in your gut, turning you into a 'perpetual spike factory' as well as cause cancer. This video has excerpts from the testimonies of Dr. Janci Lindsay and Dr. Phillip Buckhaults. Please watch their full testimonies which I've posted in the thread below. @P_McCulloughMD @JesslovesMJK @DrJBhattacharya @DrAseemMalhotra @nzdsos @winstonpeters @HopeRising19 @mattletiss7 @NickHudsonCT 🔊

Kevin_McKernan
Posted - February 26, 2024 at 9:44 PM
Saved - February 27, 2024 at 12:09 AM

@Kevin_McKernan - Kevin McKernan

The best part of these hearings is finally getting to meet other freedom orientated people you’ve only known through zoom. And it’s great to hear Senators who value freedom.

@TheChiefNerd - Chief Nerd

🚨 Genomics Expert Kevin McKernan Schools the 'Fact Checkers' on the DNA Contamination Found in the COVID mRNA Vaccines "The 'fact checkers' have been continually wrong throughout the last year this has gone on...First, they claimed it wasn't there. Now the FDA and the regulators have admitted it's in fact there. Then they claimed it wouldn't get into the cells. We've now shown that is in fact the case. As expected, anything that's inside of a lipid nanoparticle one would expect to get into a cell. Now [we're starting] to see early signs of DNA integration." *From the 2/26/2024 ‘Federal Health Agencies and the COVID Cartel: What Are They Hiding?’ Roundtable Discussion @Kevin_McKernan @SenRonJohnson

Video Transcript AI Summary
Mr. Kevin McKernan, a former leader at the Human Genome Project, discussed DNA contamination in Pfizer and Moderna vaccines. He highlighted the risks of insertional mutagenesis and integration into the genome, contradicting regulators' claims of little consequence. The DNA, found in lipid nanoparticles, can enter cells and potentially contribute to cancer. McKernan emphasized the inadequacy of current monitoring methods and called for a review of regulatory practices. The presence of DNA in these vaccines challenges existing safety standards and raises concerns about long-term effects.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Next participant is Mr. Kevin McKernan. Mr. McKernan is a former team leader of research and development for the Human Genome Project at Whitehead Institute slash MIT. He is a inventor of the solid sequencer, founder of Agincourt Biosciences and Medicinal Genomics. And he has 60,000 citations and dozens of genomic patents. Mr. McKiernan? Speaker 1: Thank you, senator Johnson. Very much appreciate you giving us audience. Many in this audience have been subjected to, you know, years of censorship on this topic. What I wanna talk to you today is about the DNA contamination that our team at Medicinal Genomics discovered in the mRNA vaccines. We're specifically speaking about Pfizer and Moderna in this case. This work has been replicated by many labs around the world, and now the FDA, the EMA and even Health Canada have admitted to this. The regulatory agents have admitted that Pfizer also omitted the SP 40 sequences that are in their vaccine. They've deemed this contamination to be of little consequence, claiming the DNA is of too little concentration to matter or to be containing DNA of no functional consequence. These statements are false and are not supported by any independent testing by these regulators. After the regulators have admitted to being deceived, they asked the opinion of the party that deceived them how bad was the deception. They shockingly believe the answer they were given, which is that these sequences have no relevance to plasma manufacturing. As someone who has worked on the Human Genome Project, manufacturing millions of plasmids, I can assure you that this is an overt lie. DNA contamination can lead to insertional mutagenesis. This is actually declared in Moderna's own patents regarding mRNA vaccines. This is US patent 10,000,000,898,574. This is also supported by Lim et al, which speaks to the rate of spontaneous integration in the genome during transfection. We are using transfection, after all, with LMPs. The SV 40 DNA is in fact functional. It is published as a potent gene therapy tool in a nuclear targeting sequence, as described by David Dean et al. The SP 40 promoter DNA is also known to bind to the tumor suppressor gene known as p 53. This is described by Draymond et al. The DNA contains the promoter for the antibiotic resistance gene in this plasmid as well. No plasmid manufacturing can occur without a promoter for the antibiotic resistance gene, so it is clearly functional and key to plasmid manufacturing despite the FDA's comments on this topic. The DNA quantity in many vials is over the 10 nanogram per dose limit, but it does vary substantially between lots. When we use both qPCR and fluorometry, these differences these two tools give us different answers. This should be a concern that they're allowed to cherry pick between these different tools. Moderna's own patents, US patent 100,000,000 077 439, teaches that qPCR underestimates the quantity of this contamination and the DNA regulators are once again allowing them to cherry pick between these different measurement tools. DNA guidelines used to be a 1000 fold lower before the NCBI act was established, which provided liability protection for some pharmaceutical companies. The limits were devised based on the 10 minute half life of DNA in the blood naked DNA in the blood. This DNA contamination is not naked. It's protected in lipid nanoparticles, which delivers this DNA to cells, which should arguably have limits set to the ones prior to the NCBIA. We have since found Pfizer lots, 1f1042a that are at least tenfold over any lot we've measured before with qPCR, which is known to underestimate this quantity. For those not familiar with PCR, you may have received CT scores of 35 that called you positive for COVID. We're seeing CT scores of 13 on the DNA that you're injecting into children. We've applied these vaccines to some cancer cell lines and have evidence that it enters the cell and can survive several cell divisions. We have preliminary evidence, although this requires replication in other labs, that this DNA can integrate into into the genome. We found 2 spike sequence integration events in ovarian cancer cell lines of CAR 3 into chromosome 12 and 19 very recently. Since these vaccines were expected to only contain mRNA, they were never assessed for genotoxicity studies. These studies were therefore being conducted as guinea pig US citizens, as we witnessed an unprecedented rise in cancer drug sales since the vaccines rolled out. In summary, the vaccine manufacturers own patents teach that the methods being used to monitor this DNA are not fit for purpose. The patents teach the insertion mutagenesis risks present in LNP based mRNA vaccines. The only people who are in denial of these facts are the regulators who are routinely hired to work for these very pharmaceutical companies. 2 of these regulators resigned over the wanton approval of these vaccines for young patients who do not benefit from them. It is time for our representatives to repeal or review the PDUFA Act of 1992. This act allows regulators to defray the cost of regulation by accepting payments directly from the companies they regulate. Over half the FDA's budget is sourced through this act. They cannot be voted into office, they cannot be voted out, but they can improve dangerous library free mandated vaccines. These policies have harmed the public, torn our country apart as immune nurses are forced to choose between their jobs and useless and even dangerous vaccines. DNA contamination was not part of any informed consent process, and many universities still mandate these shots based on the guidance and approval of our regulators who have become nothing less than a marketing division of the companies they regulate. Thank you for the time. Speaker 0: So, mister McKeown, in in layman's terms, what is the danger of this DNA contamination? I know fact checkers said it can't get into the cell, can't get into the nucleus. Address that for us, if you would. Speaker 1: So yes. The fact checkers have been continually wrong throughout the last, year this has gone on. They initially claimed this could not get into the cells. First, they claimed it wasn't there. Now the FDA and the regulators have admitted it's in fact there, then they claimed it wouldn't get into the cells. We've now shown that, in fact, that is the case. As expected. Anything that's inside of a lipid nanoparticle, one would expect to get into a cell. Now that we're starting to see early signs of DNA integration, you know, the DNA alone may not be the cause of cancer. I think it may be a contributor. Usually, cancer requires a multiple hit hypothesis. You need to have weakened immune systems like lymphocytopenia, which these shots do deliver. You might need some suppression from p 53 or BRCA 1, which there are publications showing that the spike protein suppresses those genes. And if you added an increased mutagenesis rate, well, all three of those things can create a perfect storm that may be driving the cancer that we're currently seeing. Speaker 0: The FDA does allow a certain level, certain percentage of DNA in normal vaccines. This is different type of DNA though, correct? Speaker 1: That is that's a very good point. I'm glad you brought that up. So those regulations were written when vaccines were grown in eggs and in other cell cultures line that was present in the vector of the host. This is very high copy number of DNA of a gene therapy vector, which has these nuclear targeting sequences and has DNA in it that replicates inside of a mammalian cell. So when it gets into the cell, it can make more of itself. That's a very different contamination than what they considered when they wrote those 10 nanogram regulations. They also wrote those 10 nanogram regulations under the the pretense of a 10 minute half life of naked DNA in the blood, and we now have that DNA protected in lipid nanoparticles. And, of course, they have raised those guidelines over the last decade a 1000 fold. So we've really come to, I think, the end of the road of how much DNA we can tolerate, considering the tools we have to monitor and measure this are have never been faster, better, or cheaper. Speaker 0: You mentioned the term half life. One thing I don't think we've brought up yet is how long this mRNA, is stay lasting in the body. I mean, again, we were told and we assumed that this was gonna stay in the arm and be dissolved because mRNA is just so delicate that it was gonna be, you know, not present in the body past couple days. But now we have studies that it's been in the body for at least 2 months, and we haven't studied beyond that. Correct? And can you just address that? And does that have a component, this DNA contamination? Speaker 1: It does. So many of the studies that are looking at this, I'll name a few. Krausson et al. Looked at this in the heart and found it 30 days out in the heart. Hannah et al. Found this in breast milk. I think they went out a week on the on that study. Castruta looked at this in plasma. It was out 28 days. And I think, outside of that, we're recently seeing it in, in, pregnant women inside of placenta, which is a real serious concern. We many of those studies do not differentiate between RNA or DNA, so it could be a combination of both of these things that are contributing to that signal. But DNA is certainly more stable than RNA. They have made modifications to this RNA that makes it last longer, but I think the verdict is still out as to which one has, more longevity. Speaker 0: Again, thank you, mister McKernan.
FFT1776
Posted - February 28, 2024 at 11:14 AM
Saved - February 28, 2024 at 3:51 PM

@FFT1776 - Sheri™ @FFT1776

A known cancer causing sequence was added to the Covid vaccines. It wasn’t needed. Why was it added? Why was this info then redacted and hidden? https://t.co/aHmpPNODcx

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker questions the presence of SB40 sequences in vaccines, suggesting they could lead to cancer through insertional mutagenesis. They advocate for alternative treatments like hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, claiming they are safe and effective. The speaker criticizes the FDA for redacting data on vaccine contamination, questioning their transparency.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This was more nefarious than Doctor. Burkhold. In what sense are you saying that? The SB40 sequences, they should not be there. They don't need to be there to grow this in bacteria. I don't think it's an accident. They could have chosen another plasmid that did not have the SB 40 sequences. If these sequences set above an oncogene and and they're promiscuous, that means they are likely to to integrate in places more likely than other genetic inserts. Thank you so much. Then they can cause cancer. Insertional mutagenesis, anyway, causes cancer, and that's the risk. That's why gene therapies were not brought to market for so many years because there was a risk of coughing cancer from the sartanal metagenesis. We never needed these vaccines. We had treatments that worked. One of our doctors here is going to tell you about that hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin. I can tell you as a toxicologist, they are not toxic. They're they're some of the safest drugs you can use. I there's no reason once the FDA found out about this contamination. Okay. And we looked to see endotoxin levels, but they've got them all redacted. Why would you redact them if you were trying to be transparent? Why would you hold the data for 75 years?
liz_churchill10
Posted - March 14, 2024 at 2:58 AM
Saved - March 14, 2024 at 10:39 AM

@liz_churchill10 - Liz Churchill

Frightening. We tried to warn you. “DNA contamination was confirmed by multiple Independent Labs around the World. Surgeon General Dr. Ladapo reached out to the FDA/CDC for answers. So many young people are dying…” @TexasLindsay_ https://t.co/y9C8xbWoh7

Video Transcript AI Summary
Florida surgeon general expresses concerns about DNA integration with COVID vaccines, questioning their safety for humans. Local doctor acknowledges conflicting information between state and federal health authorities. Oncologist reports patients experiencing relapses post-booster shots, suggesting a potential link. Critic highlights media's failure to address significant increase in all-cause mortality. The conversation revolves around vaccine safety, adverse effects, and the need for thorough investigation.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Florida surgeon general says for us to stop getting the COVID vaccine. Speaker 1: Fox 30 five's Hannah McKenzie is joining us live in the alert center tonight. So, Hannah, he says watching the Moderna and Pfizer vaccines is a problem. Speaker 2: Yeah, Lou Anne. John, Florida surgeon general doctor Ladipo says he has safety concerns pertaining to the FDA or the CDC. Doctor Ladipo says by the FDA or the CDC. Doctor Ladipo says if the risks of DNA integration with COVID vaccines cannot be addressed, then the vaccines aren't appropriate for use in humans. He says he sent letters to the heads of the FDA and the CDC specifically questioning how this would impact humans in 3 main areas, healthy human genes being transformed into cancerous cells, chromosomal instability, and how the integration could affect unintended parts of the body, such as the heart, brain, lungs, even the injection site itself. We asked local doctor Michael Sparks to weigh in. Doctor Sparks telling us with the state surgeon general saying one thing and the FDA another, health providers are left stuck in the middle. Speaker 0: New things are scary. We if we look back historically, we've introduced new medications that we were told were very safe, we're gonna be very effective, and they turned out not to be safe or effective, new. And that's where the research comes into play. There have been so many millions of doses of this vaccine delivered, though, that if we were to expect to see some of these theoretical problems, we should start seeing them. There have been so many millions of doses of this vaccine delivered, though, that if we were to expect to see some of these, you know, theoretical problems, we should start seeing them. Speaker 3: I'm Angus Stargliesch. I'm professor of oncology at St. George's, a consultant medical oncologist. And I have started to notice that several of my patients have melanoma who've been stable with stage 4 disease. They've had very good immunotherapy or other treatments. And I've been reviewing them from 5 to 20 years. I've noticed that I have now over 6, possibly 7, even an 8th yesterday, who've clearly relapsed following the booster vaccine. At first, we didn't, put the 2 together. But when patients said, I felt awful since the vaccine, I've just been drained. They describe symptoms of, like, a long COVID. And the next thing we know, 2, 3 weeks, couple of months later, they've got clear evidence of relapse. And these relapses are quite aggressive. Little nodule that requires surgical excision. But it's not just this. I'm now very much aware in my own circle of many people who are having, they haven't got melanoma, but they've never had anything before. But they've got lumps and bumps, and they're not feeling well. And 2 people I have interviewed at great length, they all put it down to feeling awful after their booster. They were fine with the first two vaccines or just had, shivers, flu, etcetera. But they've described being very tired, very fatigued, wanted to stay in bed. And this has dragged on to the point where they've gone to the doctor, and they've had blood counts and investigations. And I now know 7 of them. 2 of them are flotenias, and the others have, lymphomas. And one of them has a very bad myeloma, which he was absolutely sure was, instigated by the booster as he developed the dreadful symptoms. So, really, I want to bring every to everybody's attention that I think this does not look like a coincidence to me. And we nearly, we need to join forces and see if this is a real, effect. And if it is, we must stop all the boosters in easily. Thank you. Speaker 4: If the media was legitimate, they would be talking about one of the biggest crisis that's happening in this country right now, which is a massive increase in all cause mortality. Speaker 3: Yep. Speaker 4: It's a massive increase, and they're completely sign on on it. It's like in some age groups, it's a 40 plus percent increase in all cause mortality, heart attacks, strokes, cancer. Gee, what what do you think happened that changed where all of a sudden there's this massive increase and it coincides with something else? Don't you think maybe they would investigate that? Wouldn't don't you think that, like, you would have some sort of investigative reporter that dives deep into this and gets to the bottom of it? No. They can't because they're being said. They're getting captured. They're totally capture. Speaker 0: A 100%.
Humanspective
Posted - October 12, 2024 at 10:51 PM
Saved - October 13, 2024 at 4:25 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared a significant moment in Australia where the Port Hedland Council voted 5-2 to call for an immediate suspension of Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines due to alarming levels of DNA contamination. The motion aims to inform all local councils and health practitioners across Australia, urging them to share this critical information with patients. I emphasized the importance of questioning government silence on health risks and expressed hope that this grassroots movement could inspire broader action nationwide and potentially worldwide.

@Humanspective - Humanspective

NEW. HISTORIC MOMENT IN AUSTRALIA. The action that results from this could end up sweeping the World A new motion brought by the Port Hedland Council, in Western Australia, gets a 5-2 majority vote to "Call for an immediate suspension of the Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 products". Here's some IMPORTANT POINTS of the motion that was passed by majority: ◻️All 537 Local Councils Australia Wide will be notified that they have called for the immediate suspension of covid mRNA vaccine, providing also the evidence and research around DNA contamination ◻️ "That Council forthwith deliver the letter seen at Annexure 1 to the Prime Minister" ◻️ "That Council forthwith circulates to all registered health practitioners and medical clinics operating within the Port Hedland Local Government Area" ◻️Councils will “Circulate to all other Australian Local Government Councils and shires [informing] all Councils and Shires about the findings” ◻️“Council strongly urges to practitioners to share this information with patients contemplating receiving any Pfizer or Moderna Cvoid mRNA vaccines” ◻️The CEO and their delegates contact the Commonwealth Minister for Health and Aged Care, Mark Butler, presenting Dr. Speicher’s Special Council Meeting Agenda” ◻️“The Council request a formal and public response from Minister Butler", the Australian Federal Health Minister These councillors discuss "the seriousness of the matter" around DNA contamination of both Pfizer and Moderna vaccines [which showed] levels 145x higher then levels deemed safe by the TGA. The councillors say there is "Clear scientific evidence that millions of Australians" could be, or have been, exposed to these risks: (4:34) Second Councillor Speaks. Votes FOR. Mentions that the silence from the Government and Health Officials is "QUITE ALARMING" (13:33) This is a Historic Motion (14:49) Nurse with 47 years experience. Votes FOR (16:21) Fourth Councillor votes FOR (16:57) Deputy Mayor. Votes FOR (21:15) Closing Remarks by Cr. Adrian McRae and final Vote. Adrian mentions BRIEF OVERVIEW FROM TRANSCRIPT: "Evidence [shows] levels of synthetic DNA contamination [is] up to 145 times higher [than] the TGA's own safety limits. For those unfamiliar the TGA limits are there for a reason, because synthetic DNA has been shown to integrate into human cells, leading to potential longterm health risks, like cancer genomic instability, vascular thromboses and blood clotting.....as well as immune system disruptions. These findings are alarming, but they are also far from isolated. Independent studies now in Canada, Germany and the US have all confirmed similar levels of contamination. International experts including some of the world's leading oncologists, geneticists, virologists, immunologists, microbiologists, and biochemists have joined forces to warn governments around the world, including our own government, about the dangers these contaminants pose. This is why the honorable Russell Broadbent MP, the Federal Member for Monash, has written multiple letters to the Prime Minister urging an immediate investigation and suspension of these vaccines. Yet the response from our government has been nothing but silence, not a word from the Prime Minister, not a word from the minister of health, despite receiving clear scientific evidence that millions of Australians could be at risk including those folks right here in Port Headland who were forced to take these experimental shots" "Sure health is not in the remit of of local government, but looking after our people most certainly is.....Tonight it was certainly not doing anything other than asking questions.....I would like to think that most of the people here are are not scared to ask questions of our bosses or of our state governments, or federal governments....we're all people no matter, you know, we're all just making our way through and I just think [that] this motion tonight [could] be the ripple that um creates a bigger wave across the country, and perhaps across the world. So there are a lot of people watching this, I know all over the world, pretty much every continent is covered and it's been a honour to talk with you guys about it, and it's an honour to represent you guys on such an issue.... [but] I just hope that everyone votes the right way and [I think] most people here know what the right way is so thank you" This really could be the beginning of a grass roots movement within the smaller government councils, notifying smaller communities Australia wide, pushing the Federal and State governments to take real action

@Humanspective - Humanspective

@_aussie17 @SaiKate108 @KatieGrace2022 @drcole12 @Kevin_McKernan @BroadbentMP @SenatorRennick @MRobertsQLD @roller2426 @risemelb @Carmilla5 @Theblackfemini3 @drmelissamccann @DrJulieSladden @myletrinh123

@Humanspective - Humanspective

@_aussie17 @SaiKate108 @KatieGrace2022 @drcole12 @Kevin_McKernan @BroadbentMP @SenatorRennick @MRobertsQLD @roller2426 @risemelb @Carmilla5 @Theblackfemini3 @drmelissamccann @DrJulieSladden @myletrinh123 Make sure to send/text the link to friends and family to let them know their local council will be receiving this information so they can follow up with them in their own communities 🙏

Kevin_McKernan
Posted - October 13, 2024 at 3:08 AM
Saved - October 13, 2024 at 9:12 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I have evidence that DNA is replicating in mammalian cells, suggesting that the billions of SV40 promoters and origins of replication are likely underestimated. Recently, the Port Hedland Council in Australia voted to call for an immediate suspension of Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines due to alarming levels of DNA contamination, which are 145 times higher than safety limits. This motion aims to raise awareness among local councils and health practitioners about potential risks, sparking a grassroots movement for further investigation and action.

@Kevin_McKernan - Kevin McKernan

We have evidence the DNA is replicating in mammalian cells so the billions or SV40 promoters and origins of replication is an under estimate. Self amplifying vaccines were deployed 3 years ago and no one consented to that.

@Humanspective - Humanspective

NEW. HISTORIC MOMENT IN AUSTRALIA. The action that results from this could end up sweeping the World A new motion brought by the Port Hedland Council, in Western Australia, gets a 5-2 majority vote to "Call for an immediate suspension of the Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 products". Here's some IMPORTANT POINTS of the motion that was passed by majority: ◻️All 537 Local Councils Australia Wide will be notified that they have called for the immediate suspension of covid mRNA vaccine, providing also the evidence and research around DNA contamination ◻️ "That Council forthwith deliver the letter seen at Annexure 1 to the Prime Minister" ◻️ "That Council forthwith circulates to all registered health practitioners and medical clinics operating within the Port Hedland Local Government Area" ◻️Councils will “Circulate to all other Australian Local Government Councils and shires [informing] all Councils and Shires about the findings” ◻️“Council strongly urges to practitioners to share this information with patients contemplating receiving any Pfizer or Moderna Cvoid mRNA vaccines” ◻️The CEO and their delegates contact the Commonwealth Minister for Health and Aged Care, Mark Butler, presenting Dr. Speicher’s Special Council Meeting Agenda” ◻️“The Council request a formal and public response from Minister Butler", the Australian Federal Health Minister These councillors discuss "the seriousness of the matter" around DNA contamination of both Pfizer and Moderna vaccines [which showed] levels 145x higher then levels deemed safe by the TGA. The councillors say there is "Clear scientific evidence that millions of Australians" could be, or have been, exposed to these risks: (4:34) Second Councillor Speaks. Votes FOR. Mentions that the silence from the Government and Health Officials is "QUITE ALARMING" (13:33) This is a Historic Motion (14:49) Nurse with 47 years experience. Votes FOR (16:21) Fourth Councillor votes FOR (16:57) Deputy Mayor. Votes FOR (21:15) Closing Remarks by Cr. Adrian McRae and final Vote. Adrian mentions BRIEF OVERVIEW FROM TRANSCRIPT: "Evidence [shows] levels of synthetic DNA contamination [is] up to 145 times higher [than] the TGA's own safety limits. For those unfamiliar the TGA limits are there for a reason, because synthetic DNA has been shown to integrate into human cells, leading to potential longterm health risks, like cancer genomic instability, vascular thromboses and blood clotting.....as well as immune system disruptions. These findings are alarming, but they are also far from isolated. Independent studies now in Canada, Germany and the US have all confirmed similar levels of contamination. International experts including some of the world's leading oncologists, geneticists, virologists, immunologists, microbiologists, and biochemists have joined forces to warn governments around the world, including our own government, about the dangers these contaminants pose. This is why the honorable Russell Broadbent MP, the Federal Member for Monash, has written multiple letters to the Prime Minister urging an immediate investigation and suspension of these vaccines. Yet the response from our government has been nothing but silence, not a word from the Prime Minister, not a word from the minister of health, despite receiving clear scientific evidence that millions of Australians could be at risk including those folks right here in Port Headland who were forced to take these experimental shots" "Sure health is not in the remit of of local government, but looking after our people most certainly is.....Tonight it was certainly not doing anything other than asking questions.....I would like to think that most of the people here are are not scared to ask questions of our bosses or of our state governments, or federal governments....we're all people no matter, you know, we're all just making our way through and I just think [that] this motion tonight [could] be the ripple that um creates a bigger wave across the country, and perhaps across the world. So there are a lot of people watching this, I know all over the world, pretty much every continent is covered and it's been a honour to talk with you guys about it, and it's an honour to represent you guys on such an issue.... [but] I just hope that everyone votes the right way and [I think] most people here know what the right way is so thank you" This really could be the beginning of a grass roots movement within the smaller government councils, notifying smaller communities Australia wide, pushing the Federal and State governments to take real action

@Kevin_McKernan - Kevin McKernan

This is the background. https://anandamide.substack.com/p/plasmid-dna-replication-in-bnt162b2

Plasmid DNA replication in BNT162b2 vaccinated cell lines FLCCC interview & more anandamide.substack.com

@Kevin_McKernan - Kevin McKernan

This is the mechanism. Normally SV40 Ori’s need T antigen to replicate… Unless they have ColE1 and F1 origins as seen in the Pfizer vaccine. https://t.co/SigHYBFqGT

iluminatibot
Posted - October 14, 2024 at 2:12 AM
Saved - October 14, 2024 at 10:10 PM

@iluminatibot - illuminatibot

"The Pfizer vaccine is contaminated with plasmid DNA, it's not just mRNA, it’s got bits of DNA in it." - Professor Phillip Buckhaults, Phd in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. He does cancer genomics research at the University of South Carolina. https://t.co/5MERUtHT6a

Video Transcript AI Summary
The Pfizer vaccine is contaminated with plasma DNA, not just mRNA. This DNA is the DNA vector used as the template for the in vitro transcription reaction. This was discovered by sequencing vials of Pfizer vaccine from Colombia. It's surprising that there's any DNA in there. The speaker is alarmed about the possible consequences of this, including rare but serious side effects like death from cardiac arrest. Mixing DNA with a lipid complex allows it to enter cells and become a permanent fixture. This is a real hazard for genome modification of long-lived somatic cells, like stem cells, and could cause a sustained autoimmune attack. There is also a very real theoretical risk of future cancer in some people. The risk is not zero and it may be high enough that we ought to figure out if this is happening or not.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Competence to be gracious. So the Pfizer vaccine is contaminated with plasma DNA. It's not just mRNA. It's got bits of DNA in it. This DNA is the DNA vector that was used, as the template for the in vitro transcription reaction when they made the mRNA. I know this is true because I sequenced it in my own lab. The vials of Pfizer vaccine that were given out here in Colombia, one of my colleagues was in charge of that vaccination program in the college of pharmacy. And for reasons that I still don't understand, he kept every single vial. So he had a whole freezer full of the empty vials. Well, the empty vials have a little tiny bit in the bottom of them. He gave them all to me, and I looked at them. We had 2 batches that were given out here in Colombia. And I checked these 2 batches, and I checked them by sequencing. And I sequenced all the DNA that was in the vaccine. And I can see what's in there. And it's surprising that there's any DNA in there. And you can kinda work out what it is and how it got there. And I'm kind of alarmed about the possible consequences of this, both in terms be causing some of the rare but serious side effects like death from cardiac arrest. So there's a lot of cases now, of people having suspicious death after vaccine. It's hard to prove what caused it. It's just, you know, vaccine mix. This is just the way it works. We do this in the lab all the time. We take pieces of DNA, we mix them up with a lipid complex like the Pfizer vaccine is in, we pour it on the cells and a lot of it gets into the cells and a lot of it gets into the DNA of those cells and becomes a permanent fixture of the cell. It's not just a temporary, a temporary thing. It is in that cell and all of its progeny from now on forevermore. Amen. So that's why I'm kind of alarmed about this DNA being in the vaccine. It's it's it's different from RNA because it can be permanent. This is a real hazard for genome modification of long lived somatic cells, like stem cells, and it could cause theoretically, this is all a theoretical concern, but it's pretty reasonable based on solid molecular biology, that it could cause a sustained autoimmune attack toward that tissue. It's also a very real theoretical risk of future cancer in some people. Depending on where in the genome this foreign piece of DNA lands, it can interrupt a tumor suppressor or activate an oncogene. I think it'll be rare, but I think the risk is not zero and it may be high enough that we are to figure out if this is happening or not. And, again, the the the autoimmunity thing is not my wheelhouse. I'm not an immunologist, but the cancer risk is. That's my bag. I know this is a thing, and it is a possibility.
thehealthb0t
Posted - October 29, 2024 at 8:45 AM
Saved - October 29, 2024 at 12:57 PM

@thehealthb0t - healthbot

"The Pfizer vaccine is contaminated with plasmid DNA, it's not just mRNA, it’s got bits of DNA in it." - Professor Phillip Buckhaults, Phd in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. He does cancer genomics research at the University of South Carolina. https://t.co/G1kL20ruoK

Video Transcript AI Summary
The Pfizer vaccine contains not only mRNA but also plasma DNA from the vector used in its production. I sequenced samples from two batches of the vaccine in Colombia and found this DNA, which raises concerns about potential health risks. This DNA could integrate into the genomic DNA of cells, leading to permanent changes. Such integration poses theoretical risks, including autoimmune responses and cancer, depending on where the DNA inserts itself in the genome. While these risks may be rare, they warrant investigation to understand their implications better.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Competence to be gracious. So the Pfizer vaccine is contaminated with plasma DNA. It's not just mRNA. It's got bits of DNA in it. This DNA is the DNA vector that was used, as the template for the in vitro transcription reaction when they made the mRNA. I know this is true because I sequenced it in my own lab. The vials of Pfizer vaccine that were given out here in Colombia, one of my colleagues was in charge of that vaccination program in the college of pharmacy. And for reasons that I still don't understand, he kept every single vial. So he had a whole freezer full of the empty vials. Well, the empty vials have a little tiny bit in the bottom of them. He gave them all to me, and I looked at them. We had 2 batches that were given out here in Colombia. And I checked these 2 batches, and I checked them by sequencing. And I sequenced all the DNA that was in the vaccine. And I can see what's in there. And it's surprising that there's any DNA in there. And you can kinda work out what it is and how it got there. And I'm kind of alarmed about the possible consequences of this, both in terms of human health and biology, and of this, both in terms of human health and biology, but you should be alarmed about the regulatory process that allowed it to get there. So this DNA, in my view, it could be causing some of the rare but serious side effects like death from cardiac arrest. So there's a lot of cases now, of people having suspicious death after vaccine. It's hard to prove what caused it. It's just, you know, temporarily associated. And this DNA, associated. And this DNA is a plausible mechanism. Okay? This DNA can and likely will integrate into Speaker 1: the genomic DNA of cells that got transfected Speaker 0: with the vaccine mix. Vaccine mix. This is just the way it works. We do this in the lab all the time. We take pieces of DNA, we mix them up with a lipid complex like the Pfizer vaccine is in, we pour it on the cells and a lot of it gets into the cells and a lot of it gets into the DNA of those cells and becomes a permanent fixture of the cell. It's not just a temporary, a temporary thing. It is in that cell and all of its progeny from now on forevermore. Amen. So that's why I'm kind of alarmed about this DNA being in the vaccine. It's it's it's different from RNA because it can be permanent. This is a real hazard for genome modification of long lived somatic cells, like stem cells, and it could cause theoretically, this is all a theoretical concern, but it's pretty reasonable based on solid molecular biology, that it could cause a sustained autoimmune attack toward that tissue. It's also a very real theoretical risk of future cancer in some people. Depending on where in the genome this foreign piece of DNA lands, it can interrupt a tumor suppressor or activate an oncogene. I think it'll be rare, but I think the risk is not zero and it may be high enough that we are to figure out if this is happening or not. And, again, the the the autoimmunity thing is not my wheelhouse. I'm not an immunologist, but the cancer risk is. That's my bag. I know this is a thing, and it is a possibility.
newstart_2024
Posted - November 10, 2024 at 8:06 PM
Saved - November 11, 2024 at 6:36 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I appreciate the opportunity to speak about the DNA contamination found in mRNA vaccines, particularly those from Pfizer and Moderna. Our research, supported by multiple labs, reveals that the FDA and other regulatory bodies have acknowledged this contamination but downplay its significance. I argue that this DNA can lead to serious issues, including insertional mutagenesis, and that the methods used to measure contamination are inadequate. The lack of proper genotoxicity studies means the public has been subjected to untested risks. It's crucial to reconsider the regulations that allow this situation to persist.

@newstart_2024 - Camus

Powerful testimony by dr. Kevin McKernan: "Thank you, Senator Johnson. I very much appreciate you giving us this audience. Many in this audience have been subjected to years of censorship on this topic. What I want to talk to you today is about the DNA contamination that our team at Medical Genomics discovered in the mRNA vaccines. We're specifically speaking about Pfizer and Moderna in this case. This work has been replicated by many labs around the world." "And now the FDA, the EMA, and even Health Canada have admitted to this. The regulatory agents have admitted that Pfizer also omitted the SV40 sequences that are in their vaccine. They've deemed this contamination to be of little consequence, claiming the DNA is of too little concentration to matter or to be containing DNA of no functional consequence. These statements are false and are not supported by any independent testing by these regulators." "After the regulators have admitted to being deceived, they ask the opinion of the party that deceived them, how bad was the deception? They shockingly believe the answer they were given, which is that these sequences have no relevance to plasma manufacturing. As someone millions of plasmids, I can assure you that this is an overt lie. DNA contamination can lead to insertional mutagenesis. This is actually declared in Moderna's own patents regarding mRNA vaccines." "This is US patent 10,898,574. This is also supported by LIM, et al., which speaks to the rate of spontaneous integration in the genome during transfection. We are using transfection, after all, with LNPs. The SV40 DNA is, in fact, functional. It is published as a potent gene therapy tool in a nuclear targeting sequence, as described by David Dean, et al. DNA is also known to bind to the tumor suppressor gene known as P53. This is described by Draymond et al. The DNA contains the promoter for the antibiotic resistance gene in this plasmid as well." "No plasmid manufacturing can occur without a promoter for the antibiotic resistance gene, so it is clearly functional and key to plasmid manufacturing despite the FDA's comments on this topic. The DNA quantity in many vials is over the 10 nanogram per dose limit, but it does vary substantially between lots. When we use both qPCR and fluorometry, these two tools give us different answers. This should be a concern that they're between these different tools. Moderna's own patents, US patent 10,000,077,439, teaches that qPCR underestimates the quantity of this contamination, and the DNA regulators are once again allowing them to cherry pick between these different measurement tools." "DNA guidelines used to be a thousandfold lower before the NCVIA Act was established, which provided liability protection for pharmaceutical companies. The limits were devised based on the 10 minute half-life of DNA in the blood, naked DNA in the blood. This DNA contamination is not naked. It's protected in lipid nanoparticles, which delivers this DNA to cells, which should arguably have limits set to the ones prior to the NCVIA." "We have since found Pfizer lots, 1F1042A, that are at least 10-fold over any lot we've measured before PCR, which is known to underestimate this quantity. For those not familiar with PCR, you may have received CT scores of 35 that called you positive for COVID. We're seeing CT scores of 13 on the DNA that you're injecting into children. We've applied these vaccines to some cancer cell lines and have evidence that it enters the cell and can survive several cell divisions." "We have preliminary evidence, although this requires replication in other labs, that this DNA can integrate into the genome. We found two spike sequence integration events in ovarian cancer cell lines of CAR3 into chromosome 12 and 19 very recently. Since these vaccines were expected to only contain mRNA, they were never assessed for genotoxicity studies. These studies were therefore. being conducted as guinea pigged U.S. citizens as we witnessed an unprecedented rise in cancer drug sales since the vaccines rolled out." "In summary, the vaccine manufacturers' own patents teach that the methods being used to monitor this DNA are not fit for purpose. Their patents teach the insertional mutagenesis risks present in L&P-based mRNA vaccines. The only people who are in denial of these facts are the regulators who are routinely hired to work for these very pharmaceutical companies." "Two of these regulators resigned over the wonton approval of these vaccines for young patients from them, it is time for our representatives to repeal or review the PDUFA Act of 1992. This act allows regulators to defray the costs of regulation by accepting payments directly from the companies they regulate. Over half of the FDA's budget is sourced through this act. They cannot be voted into office, they cannot be voted out, but they can approve dangerous library free mandated vaccines." "These policies have harmed the public torn our country part as immune nurses are forced to choose between their jobs and useless and even dangerous vaccines. DNA contamination was not part of any informed consent process. And many universities still mandate these shots based on the guidance and approval of our regulators who have become nothing less than a marketing division of the companies they regulate. Thank you for the time."

Video Transcript AI Summary
Thank you for the opportunity to discuss DNA contamination found in Pfizer and Moderna mRNA vaccines. Our research, replicated globally, reveals that regulatory agencies have acknowledged this contamination but downplay its significance. Contrary to their claims, the DNA present is functional and poses risks, including insertional mutagenesis, as noted in Moderna's patents. The contamination levels vary significantly between vaccine lots, and current measurement methods are inadequate. We have observed that this DNA can integrate into cell genomes, raising concerns about long-term effects, especially as cancer drug sales have surged since vaccine rollout. The regulatory framework, influenced by the PDUFA Act, allows conflicts of interest that undermine public safety. Informed consent processes have not addressed this contamination, yet mandates persist in universities based on flawed regulatory guidance. Thank you for your attention.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Thank you, Senator Johnson. Very much appreciate you giving us this audience, many in this audience have been subjected to years of censorship on this topic. What I want to talk to you today is about the DNA contamination that our team at Medicinal Genomics discovered in the mRNA vaccines, we're specifically speaking about Pfizer and Moderna in this case. This work has been replicated by many labs around the world, and now the FDA, the EMA and even Health Canada have admitted to this. The regulatory agents have admitted that Pfizer also omitted the SP40 sequences that are in their vaccine. They deem this contamination to be of little consequence, claiming the DNAs of too little concentration to matter or to be containing DNA of no functional consequence. These statements are false and are not supported by any independent testing by these regulators. After the regulators have admitted to being deceived, they asked the opinion of the party that deceived them how bad was the deception. They shockingly believe the answer they were given, which is that these sequences have no relevance to plasma manufacturing. As someone who has worked on the human genome project, manufacturing millions of plasmids, I can assure you that this is an overt lie. DNA contamination can lead to insertional mutagenesis, this is actually declared in Moderna's own patents regarding mRNA vaccines, this is US patent 10,000,000,898,000,000,000,000, 898,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 after all with LNP. The SP-forty DNA is in fact functional, it is published as a potent gene therapy tool and a nuclear targeting sequence as described by David Dean et al. The SP-forty promoter DNA is also known to bind to the tumor suppressor gene on the SP53, this is described by Draymond et al. The DNA contains the promoter for the antibiotic resistance gene in this plasmid as well. No plasmid manufacturing can occur without a promoter for the antibiotic resistance gene, so it is clearly functional and key to plasma manufacturing despite the FDA's comments on this topic. The DNA quantity in many vials is over the 10 nanogram per dose limit, but it does vary substantially between lots. When we use both qPCR and fluorometry, these differences these two tools give us different answers, there should be a concern that they're allowed to cherry pick between these different tools. Moderna's own patents, US patent 10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 quantity of this contamination and the DNA regulators are once again allowing them to cherry pick between these different measurement tools. DNA guidelines used to be a 1000 fold lower before the NCBI act was established, which provided liability protection for some pharmaceutical companies. The limits were devised based on the 10 minute half life of DNA in the blood, naked DNA in the blood. This DNA contamination is not naked, it's protected in lipid nanoparticles which delivers this DNA to cells which arguably have limits set to the ones prior to the NCBIA. We have since found Pfizer lots, 1F1042A that are at least 10 fold over any lot we've measured before with qPCR, which is known to underestimate this quantity. For those not familiar with PCR, you may have received CT scores of 35 that called you positive for COVID, we're seeing CT scores of 13 on the DNA that you're injecting into children. We've applied these vaccines in system cancer cell lines and have evidence that it enters the cell and can survive several cell divisions, we have preliminary evidence, although this requires replication in other labs, that this DNA can integrate into the genome, we found 2 spike sequence integration events in ovarian cancer cell lines of CAR 3 into chromosome 12 and 19 very recently. Since these vaccines were expected to only contain mRNA, they were never assessed for genotoxicity studies. These studies are therefore being conducted as guinea pig US citizens, as we witnessed an unprecedented rise in cancer drug sales since the vaccines rolled out. In summary, the vaccine manufacturers own patents teach that the methods being used to monitor this DNA are not fit for purpose, their patents teach the insertion mutagenesis risks present in LNP based mRNA vaccines. The only people who are in denial of these facts are the regulators who are routinely hired to work for these very pharmaceutical companies. 2 of these regulators resigned over the wanton approval of these vaccines for young patients who do not benefit from them, it is time for our representatives to repeal or review the PDUFA Act of 1992, this Act allows regulators to defray the cost of regulation by accepting payments directly from the companies they regulate, over half of the FDA's budget is sourced through this Act. They cannot be voted into office, they cannot be voted out, but they can improve dangerous liability free mandated vaccines, these policies have harmed the public, torn our country part as immune nurses are forced to choose between their jobs and useless and even dangerous vaccines. DNA contamination was not part of any informed consent process, and many universities still mandate these shots based on the guidance and approval of our regulators who have become nothing less than a marketing division of the companies they regulate. Thank you for the time.

@newstart_2024 - Camus

Credit: @Kevin_McKernan

_aussie17
Posted - November 18, 2024 at 9:25 PM
Saved - November 19, 2024 at 7:13 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I addressed the overwhelming health crisis in Australia, highlighting the urgent need for investigation into unexplained sickness affecting many citizens. I emphasized that the Australian people deserve answers, especially regarding alarming findings about DNA contamination in Pfizer's vaccine. Experts warn that even a small number of contaminants can lead to serious health issues, yet the TGA has dismissed these concerns without proper analysis. This lack of action is a failure to protect the public, and I believe it is a matter of grave national importance.

@_aussie17 - aussie17

🚨🚨🚨 Australian Outrage Mounts as Citizens Seek Answers Following Member of Parliament Russell Broadbent's @BroadbentMP Stunning DNA Contamination Address "...health care workers are still overwhelmed in large part by unprecedented and unexplained levels of sickness right across the country. Why isn't anyone investigating this phenomenon??" "The Australian people deserve answers. Today I rise to speak as a matter of grave national importance, one that has until now been met with silence by those who should be taking decisive action. " "Experts have determined that as few as three to 10 molecules of the SV-40 promoter and enhancer sequences contaminating Pfizer's product can potentially trigger cell mutations leading to cancer, yet Dr Speicher's analysis of Australia's vials detected billions of these molecules in a single dose. For the TGA to dismiss these concerns outright, without credible testing or scientific analysis, is a failure of the duty of the Australian people."

Video Transcript AI Summary
Australia's healthcare system, supported by dedicated workers, is facing unprecedented challenges, including rising sickness levels among healthcare professionals. Concerns have been raised regarding synthetic DNA contamination in Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines, with findings indicating contamination levels far exceeding safety limits. A report co-authored by 52 scientists highlights the potential risks, including cancer mutations from minimal contamination. The Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) has been criticized for dismissing these concerns without proper investigation, using inadequate testing methods. The Port Hedland Council has called for a suspension of these vaccines following alarming cancer trends in their community. Urgent action is needed to ensure the safety of all Australians, invoking the precautionary principle until independent testing can confirm or dispel these contamination claims. Transparency and accountability are essential to protect public health.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The motion be agreed to. I call the member for Monash. Thank you, deputy speaker. Deputy speaker, Australia's world class has a world class health system, Medicare. The system is the backbone of that system is a dedication of our highly skilled, hardworking health care workforce. These health care workers were are subject to intense conditions that wouldn't be acceptable in any other industry. But day in, day out, they they get on with their job and they do it wonderfully. They bore the brunt of the pandemic and even though overwhelmed with immense pressure and unknown variables, healthcare workers stood as our first line of defence. But 4 years on, healthcare workers are still overwhelmed in large part by unprecedented and unexplained levels of sickness right across the country. Why isn't anyone investigating this phenomenon? The Australian people deserve answers. Today, I wrote to speak to a matter of grave national importance, one that has until now been met with silence by those who should be taking decisive action. My recent correspondence to the prime minister highlights alarming findings in synthetic DNA contamination in Pfizer and Moderna COVID 19 products. Deep detected levels up to 145 times above the CGA's own stated limits. Let me assure you I did not write those letters lightly. My letters were accompanied by science summary co authored by 52 eminent scientists, including Doctor David Speaker, a Canadian virologist, who authorized who authored the report investigating DNA contamination in the Australian COVID 19 Pfizer and Moderna vials Professor Angus Dalglish, one of the world's leading oncologists Emeritus Professor Wendy Hoy Emeritus Professor Robert Clancy Professor Alexandra Herrion Claude and Kevin McKernan, former research director of the Human Genome Project. These distinguished individuals put their names and reputations on the line, attesting to the overwhelming evidence of synthetic DNA contamination in these vaccines and the risk posed to Australians. The science summary speaks directly to the catastrophic implications of this contamination. Experts have determined that as few as 3, to 10 molecules of the s bbordi promoter and enhancer sequences contaminating Pfizer's product can potentially trigger cell mutations leading to cancer if doctor Speaker's analysis of Australia's files detected billions of these molecules in a single dose. For the TGA to dismiss these concerns outright, without credible testing or scientific analysis of failure of duty of the Australian people, even as the evidence was brought to the attention of the prime minister and subsequently passed the health minister, We received no scientific denial nor testing, no thorough investigation, only a letter from the minister Butler's office referring to the TGA statement asserting the findings, as so called misinformation. The TGA statement has since been revealed as misleading and wholly unreliable containing at least 14 false assertions as documented in the comprehensive analysis, coauthored by investigative journalist Rebecca Barnett and leading scientific experts. We are at a crucial juncture this day. The TGA is yet to perform appropriate tests to confirm or deny doctor Speaker's report findings. The TGA has been using a testing method for DNA contamination that grossly undermeasures the levels of DNA contamination, a method Moderna itself deems inadequate for the purpose in its own patent documents for these drugs. No further evidence has been presented to allay the concerns of scientists or the public. Instead, we see avoidance, misleading statements, and a complete lack of accountability from our regulators. I must also draw attention to the extraordinary efforts made by the town of Port Hedland Council, who after hearing from cancer expert Professor Angus Dalglesian from their own community experiencing 7 fold increase in deaths, passed a historic motion calling for the suspension of these products and to the TGA to conduct independent testing. They took a stand, not out of political agenda, but from the ethical duty to protect our community. It was the testimony of professor Dalgleish observing an alarming increase in aggressive cancers among vaccinated individuals that gave way to this decision. Professor Dalgleish's observations are echoed by other medical professionals worldwide who are documenting what they term turbocancers, cancers of an aggressive nature never seen at this scale before. For the health and safety of all Australians, I call upon this house and the prime minister to act now, invoke the precautionary principle, and suspend these products until independent testing can confirm or dispel these contamination findings. Australia cannot afford the risk of another crisis, one that would eclipse even the devastating dolunomide disaster. We must protect the health of all Australians, and that requires transparency, accountability, and action.

@_aussie17 - aussie17

@BroadbentMP WRITE UP + MORE HERE https://www.aussie17.com/p/australian-outrage-mounts-as-citizens

Australian Outrage Mounts as Citizens Seek Answers Following Member of Parliament Russell Broadbent's Stunning DNA Contamination Address "For the TGA to dismiss these concerns outright, without credible testing or scientific analysis, is a failure of the duty of the Australian people!" aussie17.com
KennyCarmody
Posted - June 8, 2025 at 7:11 PM
Saved - June 10, 2025 at 9:15 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’ve shared alarming findings regarding DNA contamination in Pfizer and Moderna vaccines, highlighting significant oncogenic risks. Studies show plasmid DNA persists in all tested vials, exceeding safety limits, and potentially integrating into human genomes. This contamination includes SV40 sequences linked to cancer. Despite regulatory claims downplaying the risks, evidence suggests these DNA fragments are functional and could contribute to rising cancer rates. Additionally, there are concerns about spike protein persistence and its implications for health. The situation raises serious questions about vaccine safety and regulatory oversight.

@KennyCarmody - Kenny Carmody

🚨 THREAD: EXPOSING THE VACCINE COVER-UP: Hidden DNA Contamination in COVID Shots — A Massive, Ignored Oncogenic Threat What you’re about to read will shake the very foundation of the COVID vaccine narrative. Kevin McKernan (@Kevin_McKernan) — a genomics expert with deep roots in the Human Genome Project — has exposed alarming DNA contamination in Pfizer & Moderna vaccines. “.. so when I see what they're doing with these vaccines, several red flags emerged, and I began speaking about it. Now, probably what I've been asked to speak about here is what we found in the Pfizer vaccines, which are plasmids. Pfizer and Moderna both have their expression vectors still in the vaccines.” Here’s the truth you haven’t been told 🧵

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker addresses a New Zealand commission, apologizing for the COVID narrative originating from the U.S., specifically Massachusetts, home to Moderna, Pfizer, and PCR companies. A billion-dollar campaign inhibited vaccine hesitancy, with Tulsi Gabbard noting that those spreading hesitancy were placed on terrorist watch lists. The speaker claims the news has been censored due to powerful budgets spinning a different story. The speaker cites 30 years of experience, beginning with the Human Genome Project at MIT, where his team engineered a robotic pipeline to purify plasmids. His team spun out technology to Agenkor Biosciences, which received a $27 million government grant from Francis Collins to be a commercial genome center for the NIH. He states he specialized in sequencing phosmids. He claims the peer review system is captured due to reliance on pharmaceutical advertisement dollars. He has dozens of patents in genomics and invented a DNA sequencer. Having no financial interest in vaccines, he began speaking out due to red flags.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hello, everyone. This is a presentation I gave to a commission in New Zealand a few weeks ago that I'm just rerecording because I don't think the Zoom call we had actually captured at all, and this is good to have on have on the record. I actually, have a history in New Zealand. I did a semester abroad in New Zealand, back in 1994. So I'm very familiar with the country, and I come here with what you you may consider an apology, from from our country, that much of this COVID nightmare that was imposed upon the people of New Zealand originated from The United States and even from the state that I live in here, Massachusetts. Massachusetts is really ground zero for this in terms of the financial interests that are at play pushing this this COVID narrative. We have both Moderna and Pfizer here, and we have many of the PCR companies that helped amplify, if you will, the PCR view of this of this pandemic. So this this information is not gonna be easy for you for you to hear, mainly because the news has been flooded with a completely different narrative on this. And so you're not at fault for not having seen this data. There was a very large billion dollar campaign here in The United States, to inhibit vaccine hesitancy. This is from the Biden administration. You probably saw a few weeks ago, Tulsi Gabbard even mentioned that people who were spreading vaccine hesitancy were put on terrorist watch lists. So this is a heavily censored field. If you haven't seen this information, it's not at your own fault. It is because there are very powerful budgets in play to spin a very, very different story. So this news is gonna be very unsettling for you, but the information is true. And I have many of the references and citations in here that you can that that can back this up. You can you can investigate on your own. So why should you listen to the so called vaccine terrorist? Well, there is I do have a long history in this field, and I don't have a history that's really financially tied to this narrative, so I can call balls and strikes pretty fairly. I've had about a thirty year experience in this field. I started off my career at the Human Genome Project at MIT. In fact, that robotic pipeline you see up there in the corner is something that our team engineered for the Human Genome Project to purify plasmids. So we live, ate, and breathe plasmid DNA purification on the Human Genome Project. Been part of my career is building companies that extract and purify these things from various cells and study the contaminants that are in them that may affect various, transfections or biological features, if you will. So, after my my my time on the Human Genome Project, I was a team leader for research and development there. We spun much of this technology out that you see in that that upper right picture, to a company called Agenkor Biosciences, which was selling these DNA purification tools, into the pharmaceutical and biotech industry. And, this company was eventually awarded a government grant from Francis Collins for over $27,000,000 to be one of the five and only commercial genome centers that were working for the NIH. So, we were right there side by side sequencing various genomes the government was looking for with a variety of other entities like Whitehead, Baylor, the Venter Institute, WashU. And we specialized in sequencing things known as phosmids, which were very low copy plasmids. So you had to be very good at extracting these these phosmids that only existed at a single copy in in in any given cell. So long history in in plasmid isolation and and sequencing these things. Over 60,000 citations that I have through the publications I have in the field, we've gotten multiple covers of different journals. So I'm very familiar with the peer review system, and this is another source of what has misled us is the peer review system is very captured right now. The they rely heavily on pharmaceutical advertisement dollars, and much like the mainstream media, they are beholden to some of those advertisement dollars in terms of what papers get selected for publication and which ones don't. So there's gatekeeping going on, which is keeping this narrative afloat, but it is starting to crumble. I'm involved in dozens of patents in the genomics field. I've even invented a DNA sequencer that went to market. The NIH also gave us another $6,000,000 grant for building the solid sequencer. Applied Biosystems came and acquired that company and brought that sequencer to market to compete with Illumina. I've been also involved in building genome centers and in doing clinical sequencing of mitochondrial patients. So a long history in this field, but I don't have any revenue or interest in the vaccine space. And so, when I see what they're doing with these vaccines, several red flags emerged, and, I began speaking about it.

@KennyCarmody - Kenny Carmody

2️⃣ What did we find? “Pfizer and Moderna both have their expression vectors still in the vaccines… plasmid DNA contamination.” @Kevin_McKernan published a paper that kicked off global replication — including studies in 🇨🇦🇩🇪🇺🇸 — confirming residual DNA in every vial tested. 👇 🔬 David Speicher @DJSpeicher (Canada): Tested 30+ vials — found DNA in all of them 🔬 Philip Buckhaults @P_J_Buckhaults (South Carolina): Replicated findings, gave powerful testimony 🔬 Dr. Sin Lee: Confirmed with Sanger sequencing 🔬 Brigitte König (Germany): Peer-reviewed replication 🔬 Ulrich Kammerer’s lab: Showed plasmid DNA persists in cell lines for several cycles 🔬 Even high school interns at FDA found contamination 6–470x over legal limit “This DNA isn’t gone in 48 hours. Some of it contains SV40 elements. And it’s easy to detect — which makes you wonder how it passed through regulation for 13 billion doses.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the finding of plasmids in Pfizer vaccines, referencing a widely read paper that initiated inquiry into the consequences of this residual contaminant. David Speaker replicated this work in Canada, finding it in every one of over 30 vials. Philip Buchholz replicated this in South Carolina, and Dr. Sid Lee replicated the work using different primers and Sanger sequencing. Bridget Koning has replicated this in Germany, and several federal agencies have admitted the presence of DNA, though disagreeing on clinical implications. Ulrich Kammerer's lab replicated the work, transfecting plasmids from the vaccines into cell lines, where they persisted for several cycles of cell division. High schoolers interning at the FDA White Oak facility also measured it and found it to be significantly over the limit. Numerous studies have replicated these findings, with most finding levels over the limit. One individual with ties to Moderna claims it is not over the limit. Kaiser et al. claimed to have found it slightly over the limit but deemed it inconsequential; however, their DNA isolation method has been refuted by Kommer and Konig.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Now probably, what I've been asked to speak about here is what we found in in the Pfizer vaccines, which are plasmids. Pfizer and Moderna both have their expression vectors still in the vaccines. So there's a paper here that I have the QR code up there so you can quickly get to. It's been heavily downloaded. It's been read by hundreds of thousands of people. And this really started this inquiry into what is what are the consequences of this residual contaminant that's in the vaccines, and does it have any biological implications for the patients who have been injected with these things? There's another paper from David Speaker who replicated this work in Canada. This is probably the largest study to date, that looked at over 30 vials and found it in every one of them. And, this work is now making its way through peer review, and various other people have replicated this around the world. Philip Buchholz replicated this in South Carolina. There's a great testimony from him, that's online. Doctor. Sid Lee, who is well known for having found DNA contamination in the HPV vaccines, was intrigued by this and also replicated the work using different primers and Sanger sequencing. Bridget Koning has now replicated this in Germany, and her papers are through, peer review. And several federal agencies have now come out and admitted that this is there. Now they disagree on its clinical implications, and we'll get into that, but, there is no question that this DNA, is in these vaccines and, that some of this information wasn't disclosed. Another group in Germany, Ulrich Kammerer's lab actually replicated this work and actually took these plasmids from the vaccines and transfected them into cell lines to see how long they persisted in cell lines. And they persisted for several cycles of cell division. So, there's some persistence to this, although the exact persistence is still being studied, it is not going away in forty eight hours. So this DNA has these SV40 components that we're going to touch on and you can detect them in several passages of cells after they've been transfected with these vaccines. And that has certain implications for how long the spike protein may be persisting in in various patients' bodies after injection. This has become so easy and routine to do that a group of high schoolers who were doing an internship at the FDA White Oak facility went to measure it as well and they found it to be six to four seventy fold over the limit. This is published in the Journal of High School Science. So you don't need a sophisticated laboratory to find this. It's actually quite easy to find, which is, makes a little bit more shocking as to how it ended up there and how the regulations, have missed this the process of giving out 13,000,000,000 to 5,000,000,000 people. There's a whole list of studies now that have replicated this. Every one of these studies you see here that's listed in red on the right has found it over the limit. There is one individual who has not published their methods yet that claims it is not over the limit. This person has some ties to Moderna, however, so there are some conflicts involved there. I think you'll find most of the other authors here do not have any financial ties to the vaccine industry and are reporting things with a little bit more consensus as to what the problem is. There is another paper that has emerged as of late, but it does also have some BioNTech ties. There's a paper from Kaiser et al that claims to have found this to be slightly over the limit, but not as much as everybody else, and deemed it not to be anything of consequence. However, this paper has some flaws in that it used a DNA isolation method that lost a lot of the DNA, particularly the small DNA. It couldn't capture using an ethanol precipitation of that DNA. So that has been refuted by both Kommer and by Konig and the methods that I've reviewed I think Kommer and Konig have this right. They have adequately captured the smaller molecules and are counting

@KennyCarmody - Kenny Carmody

3️⃣ Why does DNA in the vax matter? “There is a limit… it used to be 1,000-fold lower.” The original DNA limit was 10 picograms per dose. But regulators raised it drastically — especially after liability shields were granted under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act. Problem is: ❌ That limit was based on naked DNA ❌ Naked DNA degrades fast — half-life: 5–10 minutes 🧬 But now it’s encapsulated in lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) “That means this DNA isn’t breaking down. It’s being delivered directly into cells.” So even the current limits are obsolete, and the actual levels found? 🚨 100 nanograms to 1 microgram per dose 🚨 That’s 10–100x over the limit — and the limit no longer even applies ⸻ “So how did this happen?” Pfizer’s clinical trial used a different product than what got mass-injected. During trials: ✅ They purified the RNA with PCR — cutting plasmid contamination But scaling up? ❌ They skipped that step ❌ Used cheaper plasmid purification straight from E. coli ⚠️ Possibly leaving behind endotoxin (LPS) — which can cause septic-like reactions Remember people collapsing in vax centers? “That is likely LPS — though not yet measured directly.” What has been measured is the plasmid DNA. And it’s everywhere. Published, peer-reviewed, replicated worldwide. “This is not a conspiracy theory. BMJ has published on this. Pfizer switched products — and regulators knew.” The EMA even requested a small trial (n=250) after the change. That data? 🚫 Never delivered. This is called bait-and-switch — and in vaccine manufacturing: “The process is the product. You change the process, you run new trials. They didn’t.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
The amount of DNA allowed in vaccines was loosened a thousandfold after liability waivers were granted. These limits assumed naked DNA injection, which degrades quickly. However, mRNA vaccines use lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) that also coat contaminating DNA, invalidating the old limits. Studies show DNA levels in the shots are 10 to 100 times higher than the already obsolete limits. The LNPs deliver this DNA directly into cells, changing its persistence and biological impact. Pfizer used a different, more purified product in its trials than what was injected into billions of people. The initial process included a PCR amplification step to reduce DNA background, but this was dropped for mass production due to cost. This resulted in higher levels of background plasmid DNA and potentially E. coli components like endotoxin in the shots, possibly causing anaphylactic reactions. The presence of plasmids has been confirmed, and this process change, documented in the BMJ, is a major violation of manufacturing standards. The EMA requested a new trial after the process change, but the data was never delivered, rendering the original trial data irrelevant.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: DNA. There is in fact, a limit. This limit of how much DNA can be in a vaccine was derived many decades ago, and it used to be a thousand fold higher. I'm sorry. A thousand fold lower of a threshold, and that it was 10 picograms that they would allow an injection. And since they've gotten a liability waiver on these vaccines here in The United States through the National Childhood of Vaccine Injury Act, they have dilated and loosened those restrictions by a thousand fold over the last few decades. But all of these thresholds, were based on the assumption of injecting naked DNA, which does get degraded pretty quickly, in your bloodstream. You have you have LNPs I'm sorry. You have DNAs that go and actually chew up this DNA, and, that limits, its half life to five or ten minutes. The change that's occurred in order to make this mRNA platform work, that mRNA would also degrade very quickly and be a very useless therapeutic if it were not coated in a lipid nanoparticle. The challenge we have here is these lipid nanoparticles are also coating this contaminated DNA, so the half lives and the the limits that they put in place are no longer valid. This DNA is gonna get delivered directly to cells. It's not going to get degraded, and arguably, the limits they have in place are now completely irrelevant. Even with these limits in place, all of these papers are reporting things log scales over. Orders of magnitude higher than this are what are being seen. A 100 nanograms to a microgram of DNA is what is being found in these shots. So the the limits are relevant and obsolete, and it's still over that limit by 10 to a hundredfold. Alright? So, we don't know how long things last now that they're in LMPs because now they're going directly into cells, and that's gonna create a a much different picture of the persistence of this DNA and its biological impact. So how did this happen? Well, the trials, this is what will shock most people. You have not heard about this in the news, but if you look through the trial work and all the communication back and with the regulators, you'll see that Pfizer ran this trial on a different product than what they injected into billions of people. Alright? This is a major, major bait and switch, that the public is not aware of. When they made this initial vaccine they were able to do an additional purification step known as PCR. They would PCR amplify the spike region off of their plasmid that they used to construct this mRNA. They'd amplify it, usually a million fold above background, and then they would make the RNA off of that. So there was a very small background region of DNA that was used to make the RNA that made these shots. When they had to scale this up, that was too expensive of a step, so they dropped it and skipped it, ripped it out, and went off purifying these plasmids directly out of E. Coli without that amplification and purification step. So now what you have is a much higher percentage of background plasmid DNA and probably some of these E. Coli components like endotoxin in the shots. We haven't measured the endotoxin but it's one of these things if you're in plasma purification you know endotoxin from E. Coli is your number one enemy when you're trying to purify a plasmid of therapeutic grade. If any of that endotoxin gets into the shots, you will create a septic like anaphylaxis, which we saw many people have post injection with these vaccines. They would drop, in the vaccine center such that they had to change the administration protocols to have people sit down for fifteen minutes after the injection. That is likely although we don't have evidence and proof of that, that is likely an artifact of these E. Coli components known as LPS lipopolysaccharides or otherwise known as endotoxin still being in the shots. Now the what we do have evidence for are these plasmids are in there without any question now. This has been replicated in many places around the world and there are consequences for having these residual pieces of DNA left inside the vaccines that we're going to touch on. This is not conspiracy theory. This has been published in the BMJ by Retzaf Levy, and they go through this process one where they where they ran these vaccines in the trial and how they changed that when they decided to go and inject the rest of the world. This is traditionally a mortal sin in vaccine manufacturing or in any sort of biologic manufacturing. The process is the product. You change the process, you have to go through trials again. And the EMA even asked them to do that, although they failed to. They asked for another trial of 250 people once they changed the process, and that data was never delivered. So this bait and switch is very important for you to understand why the trial data is of absolute zero consequence to what we're actually seeing in the field. Those numbers are a caricature of what they're actually doing with these injections.

@KennyCarmody - Kenny Carmody

4️⃣ So what happens when we actually sequence these vaccines? “We put the DNA into commercial annotation software — it highlights every functional part of the plasmid.” And here’s what we found: 🧬 Antibiotic resistance genes — always present to grow in E. coli 🧬 Promoters to activate those genes — like SV40 components Here’s the kicker: “The software automatically annotates these parts. Somebody at Pfizer had to go in and manually delete those annotations before submitting to regulators.” So yes — the DNA sequence was submitted. But… “The sponsor is obligated to annotate every open reading frame and promoter — even if they don’t know what it does.” This wasn’t an accident. It was: 🚨 Intentional removal 🚨 Deception of the FDA 🚨 Violation of regulatory guidelines The FDA only caught it years later when independent labs raised the alarm. ⸻ Why hide SV40? “SV40 contaminated the polio vaccines decades ago. When you give SV40 to cell lines or tissues, you get cancer. There’s no question about that.” The debate isn’t about if it’s carcinogenic — it’s about epidemiology and confounders. But in the lab? 🧬 SV40 is one of the most oncogenic viruses ever studied. And while the full virus isn’t in these shots, Kevin explains: “We have carcinogenic components of SV40 in these vaccines. These sequences are very functional, and they have consequences.” ⸻ So how did regulators respond? “Yes, it’s there. We weren’t informed. But it’s probably too small to matter.” Probably? 🚫 They didn’t measure it 🚫 They don’t know ✅ We do And again — they assume it’s harmless because: “They didn’t consider lipid nanoparticles. Their metric is invalid.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
When COVID-19 vaccines were sequenced, commercial annotation software highlighted functional parts of the plasmids, including antibiotic resistance genes and SV40 components. The speaker claims that Pfizer had to manually remove these annotations before submitting the plasmid map to regulators. According to the speaker, regulators received the DNA sequence, but the sponsor is obligated to annotate every open reading frame and promoter, even if their function is unknown. The speaker alleges that Pfizer intentionally removed annotations, hiding them from the FDA, which the speaker believes is a violation of guidelines. The speaker suggests the reason for hiding SV40 components is due to SV40 virus contamination in polio vaccines and its debated link to cancer. The speaker asserts that while epidemiological data is confounded by vaccine shedding, laboratory studies show SV40 is a potent oncogenic virus. The speaker claims that the vaccines contain some of the more carcinogenic components of that virus, and that these sequences are functional and have consequences.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So what do we find when we sequence these vaccines? We noticed, you take the DNA sequence that you get and you put it into commercial, annotation software to annotate these plasmids. And these commercial annotation software tools by default will highlight all the parts in the plasmid that are functional. So there's always an antibiotic resistance gene in these plasmids that's what helps them propagate in E. Coli and you have to grow these E. Coli in the presence of antibiotics and that means only the cells that have the plasmids replicate. But they also highlight things like these SV40 components that are used to drive the antibiotic resistance gene. Now what's notable with the plasmid map on the left is that the software tool automatically annotates these regions and somebody at Pfizer had to go and remove those annotations by hand before handing the plasmid map on the right to regulators. Alright? So the regulators did get the DNA sequence, but the the sponsor is obligated to annotate every open reading frame and every promoter on that plasmid even if they don't know what they do. And this is where Pfizer, got themselves into a bit of a sticky here in that they had to have gone in there and actively removed those annotations, hid them from the FDA, and the FDA once they saw our data were able to go back look at the sequence annotate it themselves later to find that, yes, this omission had occurred, and this is a violation of the guidelines, that are given. So there has been an intentional deception here that has gone on that I think everyone should take note of. Now why are they hiding s v forty? If you look through the vaccine history here in the literature, you'll know that the s v forty virus contaminated the polio vaccines. And there's a large debate in the literature that's been going on for decades as to its implication in cancer. When you give SV40 viruses to to cell lines and to tissues, you will get cancers. There's no question about that. The only debate that rages on is whether or not you can find this in the epidemiological literature. When you do studies looking at people who got the polio vaccine and who didn't, is there a real difference in cancer rates between those? And that has been much harder to see predominantly because that vaccine shedded. So the unvaccinated got it from the vaccinated because it was a live entity. Alright. So, the epidemiological data is always loaded with confounders, makes it very difficult for you to find these signals, but in the laboratory this virus is one of the most potent oncogenic viruses we know of. So, we don't have the whole virus in these vaccines. We have some of the more carcinogenic components of that virus in the vaccine, however, and I'm going to touch on some of the papers that point that out. These sequences are very functional and they have consequences when they are left behind inside of a vaccine.

@KennyCarmody - Kenny Carmody

5️⃣Initial Public Regulatory Response admitted the DNA is there, but downplayed it with three claims: http://1.It’s too small in length to matter http://2.It’s too small in quantity to matter http://3.It’s not functional But here’s the reality: ➡️ They never actually measured it ➡️ Their quantity assumptions ignore lipid nanoparticles ➡️ And new papers show the amount exceeds FDA limits ➡️ Plus, there’s clear evidence the DNA is functional All three claims are false, and the literature proves it. @Kevin_McKernan

Video Transcript AI Summary
The initial regulatory response claimed the DNA fragment was too small to matter, but this was based on an assumption without measurement. The quantity of DNA is now shown to be over the limit, especially considering lipid nanoparticles, even if the limit were justifiable. Claims that the DNA is non-functional are also incorrect. The DNA sequence includes the SV40 promoter and enhancer region, as well as an SV40 origin of replication.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So the initial public response to this or the regulatory response was, yes, it's there. We weren't informed about it, but the DNA is probably too small in length to matter. And I say probably because they didn't measure it, and they don't know. We do. The answer is too small in quantity matter. Well, that that quantity metric, as I mentioned before, is was never considering there being lipid nanoparticles around, so they don't have their metrics right there, And multiple papers have now come out saying it's actually over their limit even if that limit is still justifiable. And then they wanna claim that they're not functional. Now all three of these things are wrong, and we're gonna go through the literature that demonstrates why they're wrong. off, that DNA sequence that's in there is known as the s v 40 promoter in the enhancer region. That's that's one of the regions. There's also an s v 40 origin of replication that

@KennyCarmody - Kenny Carmody

6️⃣Let’s talk about what’s actually in the DNA that’s in these shots. “That DNA sequence is known as the SV40 promoter in the enhancer region.” But it’s not just that: 🧬 SV40 enhancer 🧬 SV40 origin of replication 🧬 SV40 poly-A signal Those are the three big ones. There are a few others, but they’re of “less significance,” per Kevin. Now here’s what makes this deeply concerning: “SV40 enhancers are used in gene therapy plasmids. These are nuclear targeting sequences. Transcription factors bind to that DNA and drag it — and everything it’s attached to — into the nucleus.” So when someone says: “It doesn’t matter because it’ll never get to the nucleus…” 🚨 That’s false. Kevin says plainly: “There’s a nuclear targeting sequence built in that guarantees it will get to the nucleus.” And even if that didn’t exist? “LNPs go to dividing cells. When cells divide, the nuclear membrane dissolves. There is no barrier to the DNA.” So either way, this is designed to get into the nucleus. “When someone tells you otherwise — that it can’t reach the nucleus — they’re running a smokescreen. They’re either lying to you or lying to themselves. This isn’t hard biology — it’s in any high school textbook.” ⸻ This DNA wasn’t random. “This was pulled directly from Pfizer’s gene therapy department. In fact, Pfizer admits this in one of their own papers.” They were trying to scale up fast, so they grabbed plasmids they were already using… for gene therapy. And what does the SV40 enhancer do? “It binds to the P53 gene — your genome’s guardian. P53 is a tumor suppressor. You don’t want anything interfering with it.” But this plasmid does — and… “The spike protein also inhibits P53. That’s two pathways of concern for oncogenic impact.” 📚 Literature from: •Zhang et al. •Welteke-Elders Group •Znikel et al. All point to the same thing: “This SV40 sequence is a hypermutability element. It induces mutations in DNA near it. The paper says, ‘potential tumorigenic activity.’” ⸻ So when you hear: “This DNA doesn’t do anything…” You can say: ❌ “No — it has published function. ❌ It binds tumor suppressor genes ❌ It alters DNA near it ❌ And it’s designed to go straight to the nucleus.” There’s a reason they didn’t disclose this. “They didn’t want you to know. And yes — this DNA lines up with some of their future business interests.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
The DNA sequence in gene therapy plasmids contains the SV40 promoter and enhancer region, an SV40 origin of replication, and an SV40 poly A signal. The SV40 enhancers are nuclear targeting sequences, ensuring the DNA enters the cell nucleus, especially during cell division when the nuclear envelope dissolves. Claims that it doesn't reach the nucleus are misleading. This plasmid was sourced from Pfizer's gene therapy department. The SV40 promoter and enhancer bind to the p53 gene, a tumor suppressor, which is concerning given that the spike protein also inhibits p53 expression. Literature indicates this sequence is a hypermutability element, inducing mutations in nearby DNA, suggesting potential tumorigenic activity. These findings contradict claims that this DNA has no function.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: off, that DNA sequence that's in there is known as the s v 40 promoter and the enhancer region. That's that's one of the regions. There's also an s v 40 origin of replication that we'll touch on, and there's a, s v 40 poly a signal. Those are sort of the three main pieces of DNA that are that are in there. A couple others that are are of less significance in my opinion. But the s v 40 enhancers, these are used in gene therapy plasmids. Alright? These are nuclear targeting sequences. So these transcription factors bind to that sequence and drag it and everything connected to it into the nucleus of the cell. So when you hear a lot of the responses to this work, they'll say, well, it doesn't matter. It's never gonna get to the nucleus. There's two things wrong with that statement. One, there's a nuclear targeting sequence in there that guarantees it will get to the nucleus. these LNPs go to cells that are dividing, and when cells divide, there is no nuclear envelope protecting the DNA. They have to go through cell division, and that dissolves during that process. So when they're talking about this not getting the nucleus, these people are are doing a smokescreen on you. They're not being honest with themselves that cells divide. And when cells divide, there is no protection of this DNA. So that's a that's something to watch out for. When you see people saying it doesn't get to the nucleus, that is a that's that's a sign that they are trying to lie to you, and, it doesn't take much more than a high school biology text book to prove them otherwise. Independent of that, this is a very potent gene therapy tool. In fact, this plasmid was pulled from Pfizer's gene therapy department that was actually mentioned in one of Pfizer's papers in terms of how they developed these vaccines so quickly, they called up their gene therapy department to, get some plasmas they could, they could use quite readily. The other literature out, out there is that this s v 40 promoter and enhancer, this binds the p 53 gene. P 53 is the guardian of your genome. It's a tumor suppressor gene. You don't want anything binding to that gene. Otherwise, you will see you may see an impact in cancer. This is very important given the literature we have now on the spike protein itself also inhibiting the expression of this gene. Welfic Aldergiaries Group has published a paper, Zhang et al, that touches on that. So now we've got two reasons to be concerned about p 53. The DNA in there interferes with it to some degree, and we know the spike protein plays a role in that pathway as well. So, there's a there's an oncogenic concern here. There's also listed literature now from Senickel et al. That demonstrates that this particular sequence is what is known as a a hypermutability element. Alright? It it it will induce mutations in DNA near it. So it is, as this paper says, potential tumorigenic activity. So when they say that there is no function to this DNA, you merely need to point to these three papers and say no, there's published function of this DNA that needs to be explained. And this is not something that you can just say, well, they forgot to tell us about it. No. It's it's it's very relevant. There's a reason they forgot to tell you about it is they didn't want you to know this was in there. And you'll see that this lines up with some of their future business.

@KennyCarmody - Kenny Carmody

7️⃣Let’s talk about integration risk — and how the DNA in these vaccines doesn’t follow the FDA’s own rules. “These FDA guidelines were based on injecting naked DNA…” But that’s not what’s happening here. Let’s break this down: 🔬 The original FDA limit for residual DNA in vaccines was 10 picograms — based on genomic DNA, which is big (~3 billion base pairs). Later, that limit got bumped up to 10 nanograms — again, assuming big chunks of DNA. But… “When DNA is small — say ~200 base pairs — 10 nanograms equals 500 billion copies of DNA.” 🧠 Why does this matter? “The smaller the DNA fragment, the more copies you get — and the more active chemical ends it has.” That means: ✅ More 5’ phosphates ✅ More 3’ hydroxyls ✅ More chances for that DNA to integrate into your genome “When you chop big DNA into small pieces, it becomes genomic buckshot.” You go from a few long strands… to a storm of integration-prone fragments. ⸻ This is basic chemistry — and the FDA knows this. “Their own literature says: If DNA gets to viral sizes (like plasmids), the safety threshold needs to drop to attograms — or femtograms.” That’s millions of times lower than what they allowed here. But what do we have in these vials? “Very small, broken-up plasmid DNA — packed inside lipid nanoparticles — and targeted into human cells.” ⸻ So what happens when you do that? “There’s a litany of literature showing high rates of spontaneous integration when you transfect cells this way.” Cited studies show: ➡️ 7–10% of cells got integration events ➡️ And that’s likely an undercount “That paper had to detect integration via a reporter gene. But if the DNA integrated without the reporter, it wouldn’t be seen.” So the true rate could be even higher. And remember: “These aren’t isolated ‘oops’ events. These are systemic, chemically favored, and expected given the way this vaccine was constructed.” ⸻ So when someone says: “It’s just trace DNA, it won’t do anything…” You can reply: ❌ “It’s not genomic DNA. ❌ It’s not naked. ❌ It’s not inert.” It’s plasmid-sized, broken DNA It’s wrapped in LNPs It’s designed for intracellular delivery And the FDA’s own documents say that’s precisely when the limits should be lowest — not ignored.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The FDA guidelines were derived from injecting naked DNA. The smaller the DNA, the more copies exist per nanogram. Ten nanograms of genomic DNA (3 billion bases long) equals about a thousand copies of the human genome. However, 10 nanograms of 200 bases of DNA equals 500 billion copies. Smaller DNA fragments act like buckshot against the genome, with more chemically active ends that facilitate integration. The FDA's literature indicates that if DNA reaches viral sizes like plasmids, limits should decrease to atograms or fentagrams. Current broken-up DNA has many active ends, leading to a high spontaneous integration rate when transfected or delivered via lipid nanoparticles. Studies show integration events in 7-10% of cells. This rate may be underestimated because many DNA fragments integrate without a reporter gene, making them undetectable. Therefore, this is not a low-frequency event.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Alright so these FDA guidelines we spoke about earlier that they were they're derived injecting naked DNA but you'll note the papers that justify this limit speak to the fact that the smaller the DNA is on a per nanogram basis, you have many more copies of DNA. So to put this into perspective, 10 picograms of genomic DNA is, was a limit before. It got raised to 10 nanograms. 10 nanograms of genomic DNA, human DNA, like the genome, is three three billion bases long. It's about a thousand copies of the human genome. Over 10 nanograms of 200 bases of DNA is 500,000,000,000 copies of DNA because you need more pieces. Now why does that matter? Well, the DNA is broken up into smaller pieces, it becomes more like buckshot when it goes against your genome. There are more chemically active ends of the DNA. The parts of the DNA that that facilitate this integration into the DNA are the ends of the DNA, the five prime phosphates and three prime hydroxyls in the DNA. So the more of those you have, the higher rates of integration you'll see. When you chop big DNA up into small pieces, its molarity goes up. In other words, a copy number goes up, and there's more of those active ends. And so this is why their own literature from the FDA points this out, that if this DNA gets to viral sizes like plasmids, the limits need to drop down to atograms or fentagrams. Alright. This is what we have. We have very small broken up DNA that has lots of active ends, and there is a litany of literature out there that demonstrates there's a very high spontaneous integration rate with this DNA like this when you transfect it, when you put it in a lipid nanoparticle and put it into a cell. It's like seven to 10% of the cells get an integration event. Alright. And this paper, I think, under measures it because it had to integrate a fairly big piece of DNA that had a reporter gene. We don't have reporter genes on these pieces of DNA, so I I suspect this paper's under measuring the rate of integration because many pieces of DNA in that paper probably integrated without the reporter gene and that they couldn't see them. So, this is not something to be, brushed aside as a low frequency event.

@KennyCarmody - Kenny Carmody

8️⃣ And you don’t need to look at these papers to know this. You can look at Moderna’s own patents to know this. •They speak to the fact that this DNA is such an integration risk •That they need to invent new methods to remove the DNA •And they do do a better job than Pfizer •They pull the DNA out much more effectively than the Pfizer vaccine •Approximately tenfold So you don’t need to look to our papers on this or our claims. The manufacturers of these vaccines have patents that speak to this being an oncogenic risk. @Kevin_McKernan

Video Transcript AI Summary
Moderna's patents acknowledge that DNA integration is a risk, necessitating the invention of new methods to remove DNA. According to the speaker, Moderna is approximately tenfold more effective than Pfizer at removing DNA. The speaker claims that the manufacturers' patents indicate that the vaccines pose an oncogenic risk. The speaker suggests that one need not consult external papers to recognize this risk, as it is evident from the manufacturers' own patents.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You don't need to look at these papers to know this. You can look at Moderna's own patents to know this. They speak to the fact that this DNA is such an integration risk that they need to invent new methods to remove the DNA. And they do do a better job than Pfizer. They they they pull the DNA out much more effectively than the Pfizer vaccines, approximately tenfold. So you don't need to look to our papers on this or our claims. The manufacturers of these vaccines have patents that speak to this being an oncogenic risk.

@KennyCarmody - Kenny Carmody

9️⃣ We also have papers from Strayer et al. that demonstrate sp40 plasmids like this are known to integrate. That's why they use them in gene therapy. Lots of literature from this particular laboratory on sp40 plasmids and integration frequency. So it does lend us to be concerned that this residual DNA can find its way into the nucleus and alter the genome. @Kevin_McKernan

Video Transcript AI Summary
Strayer et al. have papers showing that SV40 plasmids are known to integrate, which is why they are used in gene therapy. There is a lot of literature from this laboratory on SV40 plasmids and integration frequency. This raises concerns that residual DNA can find its way into the nucleus.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We also have papers from Strayer et al that demonstrate s v 40 plasmids like this are known to integrate. That's why they use them in gene therapy. Lots of literature from this this particular laboratory on s v 40 plasmids and integration frequency. So it does lend us to to be concerned that this residual DNA can find its way in into the nucleus and and all

@KennyCarmody - Kenny Carmody

🔟 SV40 Origin, Cytosolic DNA & Nucleic Acid Persistence: Why Contaminated DNA in Vaccines Raises New Oncogenic Concerns Now, I didn’t put up a paper from Quan et al. It’s another one I want to put on the record here. •Quan et al. will demonstrate that the sin of getting this DNA into the cell •Isn’t necessarily an integration event •Once you load the cell with cytosolic DNA, you can trigger the C-gas-sting pathway, which is oncogenic in and of itself So, really the damage is done on transfection. •Whether it integrates into the genome is somewhat irrelevant •Because this plasmid DNA can replicate epizomally •Meaning it doesn’t need to be in the chromosome to replicate •Because it has an SV40 origin of replication •That’s a mammalian origin of replication •That should never be in a vaccine You never want a vaccine that you’re growing in E. coli to also have the capacity to replicate in the host that you’re going to inject it into — mammalians, mammalian cell lines like humans. That is a very reckless and dangerous thing to do. •Moderna didn’t do it •There is evidence that Pfizer is at fault here •Pfizer did leave this origin of replication behind •That is only done because they were lazy and careless about this ⸻ Why do we care about this so much? •There are all of these papers that have rolled out demonstrating nucleic acid persistence •I say nucleic acid, because we don’t know from these papers whether they’re measuring DNA or RNA •They used a method known as RT-PCR, which amplifies both Many of these papers were published before this DNA contamination was known •So they assumed it was RNA, because they were looking at the spike sequence If they went back and tortured that with perhaps primers that looked at the plasmid backbone (that’s not supposed to be in the vaccine), I’m curious what they would find. ⸻ Examples: •Krausen paper – found in heart tissues, 30 days out •Rolchin paper – 60 days •Placenta – 2 to 10 days •Castro-Hughes paper – found plasmid in plasma, 28 days later •Hanna paper – found in breast milk, about 5 days •This paper is under-measuring •PCR assay is horribly insensitive •Only has ~400,000 copy LOD (Limit of Detection) •Should be down to ~10 copies If they had a more sensitive assay, •They likely would have found this out to 10–15 days in breast milk ⸻ Anyway, there’s a tremendous dose getting through breast milk. •If you add up what’s in that paper and the number of feedings a child has, •This is not an insignificant amount, as those authors suggest •They did not consider how much milk a baby drinks over the course of three days •That would add up to a substantial and sizable dose that child was getting in that feeding Credit: @Kevin_McKernan

Video Transcript AI Summary
Quan et al demonstrated that the introduction of DNA into a cell, even without integration, can trigger the oncogenic cGAS-STING pathway. The speaker claims that the presence of an SV40 origin of replication, a mammalian origin, in a vaccine grown in E. coli is reckless because it allows the plasmid DNA to replicate episomally in the host. The speaker alleges evidence suggests Pfizer, unlike Moderna, may have included this origin of replication due to carelessness. The speaker highlights concerns about nucleic acid persistence, noting that RT-PCR methods used in studies like Krausson and Rolchen may have amplified both DNA and RNA. The speaker suggests that prior studies assumed detected nucleic acids were RNA, but that further investigation using primers specific to the plasmid backbone might reveal the presence of residual plasmid DNA. The Krausson paper found nucleic acids present for thirty days in heart tissues, and the Rolchen paper found them for sixty days.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Now, I didn't put up a paper from Quan et al. It's another one I wanna put on the record here. Quan et al will will demonstrate that you that the sin of getting this DNA into the cell isn't necessarily an integration event. Once you load the cell with cytosolic DNA, you can trigger the c gas sting pathway, which is oncogenic in in and of itself. So, really, the damage is done on transfection. Whether it integrates into the genome is somewhat irrelevant because this plasma DNA can can replicate episomally, meaning it doesn't need to be in the chromosome to replicate because it has an s v 40 origin of replication. That's a mammalian origin of replication. That should never be in a vaccine. You never want a vaccine that you're growing in E. Coli to also have the capacity to replicate in the host that you're going to inject it into mammalians, mammalian cell lines like humans. Okay? That is a very reckless and dangerous thing to do. Moderna didn't do it. There are evidence that Pfizer's at fault here and that Pfizer did leave this origin of replication behind, and, that is only done because they were lazy and, and careless about this. So why do we care about this so much? Well, there's all of these papers that have rolled out demonstrating nucleic acid persistence. And I say nucleic acid because we don't know from these papers whether they're measuring DNA or RNA. They used a method known as RT PCR, which which amplifies both. And so many of these papers published before this DNA contamination was known, they assumed it was the RNA because they were looking at the spike sequence. But, if they went back and tortured that with perhaps primers that looked at the plasmid backbone that's not supposed to be in the vaccine, I'm kind of curious what they would find. But we have the Krausson paper here that, was finding this. What are they? They are out thirty days in heart tissues. There's the Rolchen paper, which is out sixty

@KennyCarmody - Kenny Carmody

1️⃣1️⃣ Spike Protein Persistence Now, very recently, we're also seeing spike protein persistence in these two papers, okay? There's the Patterson paper that found this, had these reversed here. The Yale study actually found it 709 days out and the Patterson study found it 245 days out. But this is protein that is not going away in 48 hours. It is there almost years later. Why is that? Proteins don't do that. Most proteins have a turnover rate that's in weeks, not years. So this implies something is regenerating the spike protein in your body, or it is evading destruction for long periods of time in certain wet reservoirs in the human body. So this leads people to believe perhaps this mRNA is lasting longer, or there's plasmids in there still generating spike, and we don't know the answer yet. - @Kevin_McKernan

Video Transcript AI Summary
Recent studies indicate the persistence of spike protein in the body long after the initial introduction. A Yale study detected it 709 days out, while a Patterson study found it 245 days out. This extended presence is unusual, as most proteins have a turnover rate of weeks, not years. This suggests either the spike protein is being continuously regenerated within the body or it is somehow evading destruction for extended periods in bodily reservoirs. This leads to speculation that the mRNA may be lasting longer than expected or that plasmids are still present and generating spike protein. The exact mechanism behind this phenomenon is currently unknown.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Now very recently, we're also seeing spike protein persistence in these two papers. Okay? There's the the Patterson paper, that found this, have these reversed here. The the Yale study actually found it seven hundred and nine days out, and the Patterson study found it two hundred and forty five days out. But this is protein that is not going away in forty eight hours. It is there almost years later. Why is that? Proteins don't do that. Most proteins have a turnover rate, that's in weeks, not years. So this implies something is regenerating the spike protein in your body, or it is evading destruction for long periods of time in certain wet reservoirs, in the human body. So, this leads people to believe perhaps this mRNA is lasting longer or there's plasmids in there still generating spike, and, we don't know the

@KennyCarmody - Kenny Carmody

1️⃣2️⃣ Okay, so now here's the real kicker that I haven't presented on much lately, because this is very recent work. 🚨The kicker here is that we're now finding these sequences not just in the vaccine, but we're finding it in people. And we don't know if it's integrated, but it's there. And these are studies that weren't looking for it, and the methods they used arguably suppressed the signal significantly. All right, so there's at least five peer-reviewed studies that have come out looking at RNA sequencing of people who were vaccinated and unvaccinated. 🚨- @Kevin_McKernan

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims sequences found in vaccines are now also being found in people. According to the speaker, five peer-reviewed studies involving RNA sequencing of vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals show DNA from vaccine manufacturers in patients' blood. The speaker cites studies by Ryan et al., Chakrabarty, Rhine, and Odek as evidence of Moderna and Pfizer vaccine sequences in patients' blood, suggesting blood supplies are contaminated. The speaker mentions three additional papers (Lee, Navel, and Krauszik) that, while not explicitly looking for it, also confirm residual plasmid sequences in recipients. One study, which investigated a particular disease, revealed differential gene expression in the cGAS-STING and interferon pathways, indicating a potential DNA stimulatory response. The speaker suggests this RNA sequencing data reveals the nature of the contaminant, with gene expression changes indicating a cGAS-STING-like event potentially induced by the DNA.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Yet. Okay. So now here's the real kicker that I haven't presented on much lately because this is very recent work. The kicker here is that we're now finding these sequences not just in the vaccine, but we're finding it in people. And we don't know if it is integrated but it is there. These are studies that weren't looking for it and the methods they used arguably suppressed the signal significantly. There are at five peer reviewed studies that have come out looking at RNA sequencing of people who were vaccinated and unvaccinated. If you dig through that data that is in NCBI you can take all those reads, map them against the plasmids from from the vaccine manufacturers, and you can find that DNA in these patients. There's a study from Ryan et al that looked at, like, seventy five people in Australia, and, there's a great study from Chakrabarty that went through that data and demonstrated both Rhine paper and the Odek paper have Moderna and Pfizer vaccine sequences in the patient's blood. So this means that the blood supply is contaminated. That's a very serious issue if the blood banks aren't looking for it and reinjecting this into other people. So this is this would have normally call I think, an enormous halt in any other scenario once you find components of the vaccine that were never declared that have these links to oncogenic sequences, they're now floating around the blood supply and no one's doing anything about it. Alright? That should be a concern to everybody in the in the transfusion field. There's three other papers that have recently confirmed this. Now there again, these papers were not looking for. The authors were studying other things, but their data has been peer reviewed and put into the NCBI short read archive so anyone can comb through their data and find these sequences in there. But the Lee study looked at this, the Navel study looked at this, and the Krauszik study looked at this. All of them, I have documented that there are residual sequences from the plasmids, that are in those studies, infecting, their their recipients. Some of the studies are actually very useful. One of them was looking at at a particular disease that I I'll point you to my substack that goes through these, but this particular disease state, they did RNA sequencing on to see the difference between the vaccinated and unvaccinated. And you can see some gene differential gene expression that's occurring in the c gas sting and the interferon pathways. Alright? That's a sign of a potential DNA stimulatory response. Okay? So some of the RNA sequencing is actually quite revealing as to what the nature of the contaminant is because you can see certain gene expressions get turned on or off that are signatures of a c gas sting like event that could be induced by the by the DNA that's there. So, anyway, our our substack has that documented, and it's worth worth having a look.

@KennyCarmody - Kenny Carmody

1️⃣3️⃣ RNAseq Datasets Still Detecting Vaccine Plasmid DNA Despite Suppression Methods Now Found in the Blood Supply I’ve shared these before, but for reference, here are the actual papers with their proper titles. Chakrabarty went through the Ryan et al. and ODEX datasets, and when you map those reads against the vaccine plasmids, you get a strong spike signal, which isn’t surprising — we expect the RNA to linger. But what is surprising is that you also get DNA reads, even though RNAseq protocols are designed to suppress DNA. These methods typically use DNase enzymes and RNA purification steps that eliminate or suppress DNA, yet it’s still showing up. That tells us it must be there in much higher concentrations — because if they didn’t use DNase, we’d likely see even more of it. The ODEX dataset is particularly revealing. In the upper right panel (IGB screenshot), the entire plasmid backbone is covered — all regions, including SV40 promoters. That DNA clearly made it into patients. The Novel study showed a lighter read density — so less contamination, but still detectable plasmid fragments. Same goes for the Lee et al. dataset. It’s not in every patient, since some of the samples were taken 14+ days out, but in samples closer to vaccination, we consistently see it — even with suppression steps in place. One study — in mice — wasn’t even looking at DNA. It was studying re-adenylation of the mRNA — how the poly-A tail might be regenerated in vivo, which may help explain why the mRNA sticks around so long. But even in that unrelated study, we find vaccine DNA contamination coming through. This stuff is littered across the short read archive. And that’s despite protocols trying to wash it out. The signal is still there. - @Kevin_McKernan

Video Transcript AI Summary
Chakrabarty reviewed the Ryan et al and Odek studies, mapping reads to plasmids and finding significant spike sequence from RNA, and less from plasmid DNA, which is expected. RNA sequencing protocols suppress DNA, yet DNA is still present. The Odek study shows the entire vector backbone covered with sequencing reads, indicating heavy contamination and the presence of SV40 promoters in patients. This is evidenced across multiple studies. The Novel study had a lighter density of reads, but some plasmid DNA was detectable. The Lee et al study also showed some SV40 reads. These are more apparent in samples taken closer to vaccination, despite DNA suppression methods. A mice study on vaccine redentilation showed poly A tails regenerate, potentially lengthening RNA lifespan, but DNA contamination was also present.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I would I I just have these up here so people can, quickly get to these papers. I've listed them before, but in case you you want their actual, you know, decorated titles, here's Chakrabarty on the upper left. He went through, the Ryan et al and the Odek study. And when we map those reads, the plasmids, we get a significant amount of sequence coming back from spike. That's not surprising because the RNA is certainly sticking around, but less sequence coming from the plasma DNA, which is not surprising because there is a higher molarity of the RNA in the shot than there is the DNA. And it's not surprising, these methods are using an RNA seq protocol. These RNA sequencing protocols use RNA purification kits that tend to eliminate or suppress the DNA that's there. Alright, so DNA has a harder time getting through here but we're still seeing that DNA come through. That's what is so shocking about these studies is that they're employing methods to suppress the DNA like using a DNase enzyme in prep yet it's still there. That means that it must be at much higher concentrations if the researchers didn't perform or if they were not to perform that step. If they sequenced the DNA of these people directly they would probably see tremendous amount more signal. This is the Odek study, and there you can see in the, the upper right panel there that is an IGV screenshot of reads across the plasmid, and the entire vector backbone is fully covered with sequencing reads. So this one is heavily contaminated in these patients. The the vaccine DNA is clearly all regions of it are clearly covered, including the SV 40 regions. So those SV 40 promoters are making their way into patients, and we can see evidence of this littering the short read archive across multiple studies now. The novel study had a much lighter density of reads so this one there was less there looking at this but we can detect some pieces of plasma DNA that are in there so another concern. And likewise, the Lee et al study has some of these SV40 reads as well. So it's not in every patient because some of the some of the samples they take are fourteen days out or later, but the people, when they take a sample that's pretty close to vaccination, we see it, even though they're using methods to suppress it. Now this is a study that was actually looking it wasn't in humans, it was in mice. It was looking at something completely different. It was looking at the redentilation rate of these vaccines. After you put them into some organisms, the poly A tail gets regenerated which is another reason why these might be lasting longer. Typically the length of the poly A dictates how long the RNA sticks around. Alright so they've found some processes in these cells that are re adenylating these things which may be adding to the longevity of the RNA, but the DNA is coming through these as well so that contamination is actually plaguing that study as well.

@KennyCarmody - Kenny Carmody

1️⃣4️⃣ So why do we care about this? Well, there have been several people and several data sources that have been demonstrating a rise in cancer. There's @JohnBeaudoinSr work where he FOIA-ed the death records of all of the people in Massachusetts. He's done this in many states now. And you can go through those death records and count up how many more neoplasms are we finding. And there is a clear rise in certain types of ICD-10 codes that dictate that this is, in fact, a phenomenon. We have an increased rate of cancer. There's no doubt about that from his literature, from his data. There's others who have looked at this from an excess mortality standpoint. @EthicalSkeptic has done this. His analysis does require some important adjustments in that there is a pull-forward effect that he adjusts for, which is during the COVID pandemic, a lot of elderly passed away. And that creates a bit of a shift in the data when that happens. But once that's adjusted for, you can see that there is a clear rise in cancer rates that is persisting even to this day. David Wiseman found this in the CDC data as well. But there are other forms of analysis you can look at from economic indicators. What we're also seeing from Edward Dowd and Ethical Skeptic is that the cancer treatments are up. If you look at the drug sales for cancer rates, this kind of confirms the epidemiological data when you see it in the drug treatment sales moving at the same rate. And the inflection time point of when that has occurred is concordant with when the vaccine programs rolled out. So cancer is up. The mechanism for this is still in question, but we don't need contaminants in these vaccines that are linked to it. .. - @Kevin_McKernan

Video Transcript AI Summary
Several data sources indicate a rise in cancer, including John Bowdoin's analysis of death records showing increased neoplasms. Ethical skeptic and David Wiseman's analyses of excess mortality and CDC data also support this. Cancer treatment drug sales are up, aligning with the timing of vaccine program rollouts. The GAIBO study, later removed from a preprint server, examined excess mortality in Japan, the most heavily mRNA vaccinated country. It found that post-vaccination excess mortality exceeded the combined impact of the tsunami and Hiroshima. The magnitude of excess mortality remained consistent despite declining vaccine uptake, suggesting a cumulative effect. The types of cancer also shifted to a younger demographic. Another peer-reviewed paper from Japan confirms the excess mortality, contributing to a decline in life expectancy for the first time in a long while. Only 5-7% of the excess mortality in Japan is attributed to cancer, with other causes like stroke and myocarditis being more prevalent.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So why do we care about this? Well, there have been several people, and and several data sources that have been demonstrating a rise in cancer. Alright? There's John Bowdoin's work where he voided the death records of all of the people in Massachusetts. He's done this in many states now. And you can go through those death records and count up how many more neoplasms are we finding. And there is a clear rise in certain types of ICD 10 codes that dictate that this is in fact a phenomenon. We have an increased rate of cancer. There's there's no doubt about that from his liter from his data. There's others who have looked at this from an excess mortality standpoint. Ethical skeptic has done this. His analysis does require, some in important adjustments and that there is a pull forward effect that he adjusts for, which is during the COVID pandemic. A lot of elderly, passed away, and, that creates a bit of a shift in the data when that happens. But once that's adjusted for, you can see that there is a clear rise in in cancer rates that is persisting even to this day. David Wiseman found this, in the CDC data as well. But there are other forms of analysis you can look at from economic indicators. What it would what we're also seeing from Edward Dowd in ethical skeptic is that the cancer treatments are up. If you look at the drug sales for cancer rates, this kind of confirms the epidemiological data when you see it in the drug treatment sales moving at the same rate and that the inflection time point of one that has occurred is is is concordant with when the vaccine programs rolled out. Alright? So cancer is up. The the mechanism for this is still, you know, in question, but we we don't need contaminants in these vaccines that are linked to it. This is also seen in a study called the GAIBO study, which was curiously yanked off of a preprint server after I gave a presentation on this study because the study was quite remarkable in that it looked at excess mortality in Japan. So Japan's a very interesting case study in that Japan is the most heavily mRNA vaccinated country in the world. There are 13 of that population took the shot and an even higher number, I think it's north of eighty percent, took the the two or three. Alright. So it is, there isn't a cleaner picture of this probably than any any other country in the world. And what they have seen in Japan is that the ex source mortality that's occurred since the vaccination program is larger than the tsunami in Hiroshima combined. This is a massive hit to the demographics of their country. What's also evident in their data, as you can see on the slide or the graph on the right there that has these orange bars, is the magnitude of the excess mortality is staying somewhat consistent as they layer on more doses. Alright? That suggests there's a cumulative effect because what's occurred as they've gone on, you can see the blue wave down below, is less and less people are taking these shots in Japan. Yet the magnitude of the excess mortality isn't going down with it. So your shot may have some residuals from the Right? The the the that's the cumulative damage means that this wave of ex source mortality, they're not out of the woods yet. They may see this persist for a decade. That is quite concerning, given the decay in the uptake of these vaccines over time. The other thing that's very important about this study is that the types of cancer all changed. Prior to this, they had a baseline cancer rate of different cancers. After the vaccine, the cancer shift to a younger age demographic in different types of of cancers. That's a very important sort of Bradford Hill, tendency of causality, if you will, when you see a bio biological signal like that. So, the GAIBO paper, is up on our, on our Substack because they pulled it off the preprint server once this came live. But there's another paper from Japan that that recently did get through peer review that, emulates this. And, not not to the detail of the Geibel paper, but it does show that this exorcist mortality in Japan is in fact real, and, it's evident in the data. For the time in their history, they have a decay in their life expectancy. You can see that on the the chart over here on the left, where the tsunami and the vaccine are mentioned. You can see their life expectancy was cruising along, getting better and better over the years up until the vaccine program, and now it's decaying for the time in in in a very long while. Now the excess mortality in Japan is not all cancer. In fact, only, like, five to seven percent of it are cancers. A lot of a lot of the, there's there's a survivor bias going on here. You have to not die from a stroke or myocarditis or acute renal failure in order for you to for them to find cancer. So the people are dying predominantly from these other things, but if they happen to survive that, then you can detect the cancer signal. So it is a bit more delayed and a bit more, I'd say, camouflaged by the other more acute forms of injury from these vaccines.

@KennyCarmody - Kenny Carmody

1️⃣5️⃣ What Did Pfizer Know, and When Did They Know It and Why is this happening? One of the more delayed — and camouflaged — effects of these vaccines is cancer. It’s not as immediate as myocarditis or clots, but it’s showing up. And it’s not just speculation. The signals are there. The science is there. The fraud is there. Let’s start with what Pfizer knew. Very early on, during their own trials, Pfizer saw the signals. They had the data. And they acted — not by alerting the public or regulators — but by buying up cancer treatment companies. $43 billion went into acquiring Seagen. Another $2.26 billion went into Trillium Therapeutics, which just so happens to focus on blood cancers involving CD147, a receptor known to be involved in COVID-19. That’s not coincidence. That’s a hedge. They saw what was coming. And they moved to profit from it. Meanwhile, the product that hit the market was not what was tested in trials. That’s a bait-and-switch. The clinical formulation was different. That alone nullifies every claim of efficacy. It’s scientific fraud. The trial data cannot be trusted because it doesn’t match the commercial product. Now let’s talk DNA contamination. Ten out of eleven studies — peer-reviewed or in preprint — are finding residual plasmid DNA in the vaccine vials. The only ones that didn’t have financial conflicts of interest. We now have five separate peer-reviewed studies that weren’t even looking for this DNA — they were sequencing blood or tissues — and still found it. Others went in afterward, dug through the data, and uncovered vaccine plasmid sequences floating in people’s blood. Let that sink in. We have SV40 promoter sequences in people now. These are oncogenic, and they weren’t disclosed. We’re also seeing injection site neoplasms — cancers forming right at the site of vaccine administration. This is not coincidence anymore. This is a real, repeatable signal. We’re giving this to pregnant women. It’s on the childhood schedule. And these shots are liability-free and often mandated. This may be the largest carcinogenic exposure event in human history. Now, we’re also seeing another mechanism come into view — amyloidogenic peptides. These are sequences in the spike protein that are known to form amyloids or prions — misfolded proteins that can cause other proteins to misfold in a chain reaction. This could explain the bizarre fibrin-rich clots we’re seeing — long, rubbery, calamari-like structures that don’t behave like normal thrombi. We think these prion-like sequences might be driving clotting cascades, contributing to the cardiovascular crisis we’re now observing. These aren’t easy to detect. You need specialized equipment and expertise — unlike DNA, which you can find with a PCR machine in a parking lot. But it’s there. It’s all there. And it’s time we stop pretending it isn’t. @Kevin_McKernan

Video Transcript AI Summary
Pfizer knew early on that something was going to happen, and acquired cancer companies, including C Gen for $43 billion and Trillium Therapeutics for $2.26 billion, which focused on blood cancers with a CD147 marker, also involved in COVID. The Pfizer vaccines on the market are not the same formulation as what was tested in the clinical trials, which is a bait and switch and a fraud. Significant contamination has been found in the vaccines in 10 out of 11 studies. There is also significant DNA contamination found in five peer-reviewed studies. Cancer is on the rise, with several papers reporting cancer post-vaccination, sometimes at the injection site. The vaccines may be the largest carcinogenic hit ever to the human population, and are on childhood schedules and given to pregnant women. The vaccines encode a protein sequence known to be amyloidogenic, meaning it can form amyloids or prions in the body, which may be playing a role in clotting cascades and cardiovascular issues.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Why is this happening? Well, they know something. Pfizer, very early on, they had the data on this from their trial. They knew this was gonna happen, and they quickly went out and acquired cancer companies. They put $43,000,000,000 into the acquisition of C Gen and they put $2,260,000,000 to acquire Trillium Therapeutics. Trillium was focused on blood cancers that have a CD147 marker on them. Okay? That is one of the markers that is known to be involved in COVID. So, they have a very interesting window on those malignancies, and, they're buying up the cancer companies that are probably gonna play the biggest role in benefiting from the mess that they've created. So, in summary, the Pfizer vaccines on the market are not the same formulation as what was tested in the clinical trials. This is a big bait and switch and it's a fraud. You can't believe anything they're saying about the vaccine efficiency, which we have seen even those numbers decay over time. This is probably why. They're not really what they trialed. They gave you something different. There is significant contamination that's found. Like, 10 out of 11 studies have found this, and the ones that haven't found it have some financial conflicts. So I think the consensus is out. 10 out of 10 out of 10 of the real studies are finding this. Several are through peer review, which have not been easy to get through peer review. The peer review journals do not like these papers. They get they get beat beat around in peer review for months to years, but they're they're making their way out now. There is also significant DNA contamination now found in five peer reviewed studies that were not looking at this. They were looking at people's blood and tissue, and it was accidentally in there. Other people had to go sleuth it out. We've got cancer on the rise, and there's several papers that report cancer post vaccination. Like like, right at right at the site of injection, they'll see neoplasms. Alright? There is there's something going on here. This can't be ignored saying it's a coincidence anymore. Now this is these are liability free, and they're often mandated. Okay? This may be the largest carcinogenic hit ever to the human population, and we have these on childhood schedules. We're giving these to pregnant women. This has gone absolutely off the rails, and, it's time people pull back and look at this data more soberly without the panic of the COVID pandemic clouding everyone's judgment, if you will. Now we've done some recent work as well. I'm gonna point people's attention to. There's another type of artifact in this data, that hasn't been covered as well because it's more expensive to cover. So DNA is pretty easy to measure. We have PCR machines that were testing COVID in parking lots. It's a very decentralized tool that anyone can use, which is why the replication has been so easy. What hasn't been easy to replicate and to study are prions and amyloidogenic peptides that we believe are in the spike sequence in these vaccines. The vaccines encode a particular protein sequence in there that's known to be amyloidogenic. That means it can form amyloids or, prions in the body. Alright? Prions are proteins that misfold and when they misfold they chain react to make other proteins misfold. We think this might be playing a role in the clotting cascades, which is why we're seeing lots of clots in people, that these things are facilitating a fibrin clot like structure, and this is a this is resulting in a lot of the cardiovascular issues that are seen with these very bizarre calamari clots. These are harder to measure. There's not the tools to do this aren't as cheap, and it requires a real specialist. Kevin McCarran has been doing some work, not me, different Kevin, on this.

@KennyCarmody - Kenny Carmody

1️⃣6️⃣ The Truth About These Clots Is Out, and It’s Worse Than You Think Whole Genome Sequencing of Fibrin Clots Kevin McCarran has been doing some work, not me, different Kevin, on this. And I’ve been collaborating with him in that I’ve been sequencing some of these clots to prove that they’re not a fictitious Twitter phenomenon. They’re, in fact, real human DNA in these clots. And there’s something that we’re noticing in that DNA, is that it has a signature of being a neutrophil extracellular trap. It is a type of reaction that happens in sepsis. And your immune system sees foreign entities. It begins to clot around them. And it tends to take some free-circulating DNA into those clotting structures and leave a particular signature in that DNA that we can see. This sequencing has been very informative in that we’re beginning to see sequences of the patient’s genome that might be predisposing them to this. Billions of these shots were given, 5 billion people perhaps. We don’t have 5 billion people that are clotted. But a subset of those people are having a bad reaction. We’re trying to figure out who. It may be that they have genetic predispositions in some of the clotting cascade that make them more at risk of this than other people. And we’re beginning to see this. Right now, it’s just two clots that we’ve looked at. So we don’t have statistical significance that this is, in fact, a causative mutation. But we are finding what are known as high-impact variants inside of genes involved in fibrin formation and fibrin clotting. That is a bit spooky to the least. So you can see more about that on this particular substack. And be sure to look at the links in there that point to Kevin McCarran’s work. He’ll go through demonstrating that some of these clots are binding thioflavin, which is a marker for an amyloid. And so there may be an amyloidogenesis issue that we have. That pathology is going to have to be looked at very carefully because that may be what’s behind some of these clotting problems that we’re seeing in the field. So anyway, thank you for your time. I know this isn’t pleasant information to hear, but it’s real. It’s out there. And it is being heavily suppressed. So it’s important that communities like yours can hear this. And the citations are in here for your reference if you have any questions. Feel free to contact me. Thank you. . -@Kevin_McKernan

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker has been sequencing clots and found real human DNA, showing a signature of neutrophil extracellular traps, a reaction occurring in sepsis when the immune system clots around foreign entities. This process takes free-circulating DNA into clotting structures, leaving a specific signature. Sequencing reveals patient genome sequences that might predispose them to clotting. While billions received shots, not everyone clotted, suggesting a subset has a bad reaction. Genetic predispositions in the clotting cascade may increase risk. Initial analysis of two clots shows high-impact variants in genes involved in fibrin formation and clotting. Kevin McCarran's work demonstrates some clots bind thiophlavin, a marker for amyloid, suggesting a potential amyloidosis issue. Pathology needs careful examination as it may underlie clotting problems. This information is being suppressed, but citations are provided for reference.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I've been collaborating with him in that been sequencing some of these clots to prove that they're not a a a fictitious Twitter phenomenon. They're in fact real human DNA in these clots. And there's something that we're noticing in that DNA is that it has a signature of being a neutrophil extracellular trap. It is a type of reaction that happens in sepsis, and, your immune system sees foreign entities. It begins to clot around them, and it tends to take some free circulating DNA into those clotting structures and leave a particular signature in that DNA that we can see. This sequencing has been very informative in that we are beginning to see sequences of the patient's genome that might be predisposing them to this. Billions of these shots were given, five billion people perhaps. We don't have five billion people that are clotted. A subset of those people are having a bad reaction. We are trying to figure out who. It it may be that they have genetic predispositions in sort of some of the clotting cascade that make them more at risk of this than other people, and we're beginning to see this in just and right now, it's just two clots that we've looked at. So we don't have statistical significance that this is in fact a causative mutation. But we are finding, what are known as, high impact variants inside of genes involved in fibrin formation, in fibrin clotting. Alright? That is a bit, spooky to the least. So, you can see more about that on this particular substack, and be sure to look at the links in there that that point to Kevin McCarran's work. He'll go through demonstrating that some of these clots are binding thiophlavin, which is a marker for an amyloid. And so there may be an amyloidosis issue that we have that pathology is gonna have to be looked at very carefully because that may be what's behind some of these clotting problems that we're seeing in the field. So, anyway, thank you for the time. I know this is unpleasant information to hear, but, it is, it's real. It's out there, and it is being heavily suppressed. So it's important that communities like yours can hear this, and the citations are are in here for your reference. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you.
View Full Interactive Feed